TCR_Public/170706.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Thursday, July 6, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 186

                            Headlines

A GOODNIGHT SLEEPSTORE: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
A QUIVER FULL: Seeks October 18 Plan Exclusivity Period Extension
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES: Names Former LSI Corp Chief to Board
ALBERT EINSTEIN ACADEMIES: S&P Hikes 2013A/B Rev. Bonds to BB-
ALGAR LLC: Hires Gallery 360 as Real Estate Broker

ALGODON WINES: Obtains $2.1M from Preferred Shares Issuance
ALLIED FINANCIAL: Redemption Right Timely Asserted, Judge Rules
ALLIED UNIVERSAL: S&P Affirms B+ CCR & Alters Outlook to Negative
APPLEWOOD CAFE: Hires Andreozzi Bluestein as Counsel
AVERY LAND: Buying Mohave County Property to Claret for $88M

BAIA LLC: Talati Buying Mt. Airy Assets for $7 Million
BEMA RESTAURANT: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
BIOLARGO INC: Jack Strommen Holds 6.8% Equity Stake as of June 19
BIRCH GROVE: Asks Court to Convert Case to Chapter 7
BRISTLECONE INC: Selling All Assets in Five Groups

CALADRI DEVELOPMENT: UST Wants Case Converted or Dismissed
CANADIAN ENERGY: DBRS Notes Name Change to CES Energy Solutions
CARRIZO OIL: S&P Affirms B+ CCR & Rates New Unsec. Notes B+
CARVER BANCORP: Fiscal 2017 Form 10-K Delayed for Review
CGG CANADA: U.S. Proceedings Recognized in Canada

CHARLES STREET: OneUnited Blocks Approval of Amended Disclosures
CRYSTAL LAKE GOLF: Cash Collateral Use Extended Through Aug. 25
ERIE STREET: Plan Payments Expected to be Made on Effective Date
ESPLANADE HL: Can Continue Access to FMB Cash Through Aug. 6
EZRA HOLDINGS: Deadline to File Claims Set for July 31

FALCO MOBILE: Needs Until November 29 to File Chapter 11 Plan
GENERAL WIRELESS: Intends to File Reorganization Plan by Sept. 5
GLYECO INC: 40-M Shares Rights Offering Prospectus Amended
GRAND ABBACO: Trustee Selling All Assets for $1 Million
GULFMARK OFFSHORE: Plan Outline OK'd, Aug. 1 Plan Hearing Set

H & M ART: US Trustee Wants Case Converted or Dismissed
HALFWAY TO CONCORD: US Trustee Wants Case Converted or Dismissed
HARDROCK HDD: Directed to Pay $1,583 Over 5 Yrs to People's United
HARVEST CCP: Hires Goldstein Bershad as Attorney
HAVEN REAL ESTATE: August 1 Plan, Disclosure Statement Hearing

HOME CAPITAL: DBRS Ratings Still Under Review on Neg. Implications
INTERLEUKIN GENETICS: To Fire 5 of 8 Employees to Cut Costs
INTERNATIONAL SHIPHOLDING: Chap. 11 Plan Declared Effective on July
INTREPID POTASH: Prepays $23 Million Notes Under 2016 NPA
JACK COOPER: Exchange Offer Will Result in $429.2M Debt Retirement

JACOBS FINANCIAL: Incurs $1.3 Million Net Loss in Fiscal 2016
JUPITER RESOURCES: S&P Revises Outlook to Stable & Affirms B CCR
KATY INDUSTRIES: Seeks Retirees Committee Appointment
KERENSA INVESTMENT: Case Converted to Chapter 7
LAURITSEN FIREWOOD: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

LSB INDUSTRIES: Jack Golsen Will Retire as Executive Chairman
LUCKY # 5409: Hires Schmidt Salzman & Moran as Special Tax Counsel
M.B. UNLIMITED: Seeks October 8 Exclusive Plan Filing Extension
MACDONALD DETTWILER: S&P Assigns 'BB' CCR & Rates New Debt 'BB'
MARIMED INC: Obtains $5.15 Million from Private Placement

MARINA BIOTECH: Appoint Vuong Trieu Ph.D. as Executive Chairman
MARINA BIOTECH: Issues $220,000 Convertible Notes
MARSH SUPERMARKETS: Creditors' Panel Hires Bayard as Co-Counsel
MARSH SUPERMARKETS: Creditors' Panel Hires Cooley as Lead Counsel
MARSH SUPERMARKETS: Panel Hires FTI as Financial Advisor

MED-X TRANS: Has $331,790 Tax Liability to IRS
MICHAEL BRANIFF: Falkenhagen Buying Richmond Property for $160K
MOOD MEDIA: Judge Issues Corrected Chapter 15 Order
NAVIDEA BIOPHARMACEUTICALS: Two Directors Elected by Stockholders
NEXT GROUP: Signs Employment Pacts with CEO, President and COO

OAKFABCO INC: Court Issues Amended Opinion on NERC Coverage Dispute
OLYMPIA OFFICE: Has Standing to Challenge MLMT's Claims
PARAGON OFFSHORE: Court Won't Stay Plan Order Pending Appeal
PARAGON POOLS: Court Confirms Amended Reorganization Plan
PATRIOT SOLAR: Vanguard Energy's Bid to Arbitrate Claim Denied

PAYLESS HOLDINGS: July 24 Plan Outline Hearing
PELICAN REAL ESTATE: Liquidating Trustee Hires Krigel as Counsel
PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY: Trustee Selling Odenton Property for $390K
PHARMACOGENETICS DIAGNOSTIC: PM Buying All Assets for $650K
PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC: Creditors Notified of July 12 Meeting

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC: To Keep $70M per Month Freepoint Fuel Deal
PUERTO RICO: Assured Guaranty Responds to PREPA Bankruptcy Filing
PURPLE HEARTS: Files for Bankruptcy in Canada
QUEST PATENT: Post-Effective Amendment to 100M Shares Prospectus
QUEST RARE: Files Notice of Intention to Make BIA Proposal

QUEST SOLUTION: Five Directors Elected by Shareholders
ROMEO'S PIZZA: Seeks September 1 Plan Filing Exclusivity Extension
SCIO DIAMOND: Delays Filing of Fiscal 2017 Form 10-K
SNEH AND SAHIL: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
SPRUHA SHAH: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral to Pay Creditors

STEMTECH INTERNATIONAL: Plan Filing Deadline Extended Until Aug. 16
STUART AULD: 10th Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Chapter 11 Case
T-REX OIL: To File Fiscal 2017 Form 10-K Within Extension Period
TALEN ENERGY: S&P Lowers Unsec. Rating to B- & Rates 2024 Notes BB-
TIDEWATER INC: Objects to Further Adjournment of Plan Hearing

TRUE RELIGION: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
TRUE RELIGION: Files for Chapter 11 with Plan to Cut Debt by $350M
TRUE RELIGION: Key Vendors to Recover 100% of Claims
TRUE RELIGION: Plans to Expand Pop-Up Outlet, Last Stitch Stores
TRUE RELIGION: Unsec. Creditors to Recover 4.9% to 7.5% Under Plan

UNITY COURIER: Needs More Time to Reconcile Claims, File Plan
VERISIGN INC: S&P Assigns BB+ Rating on $450MM Sr. Unsec. Notes
WALTER INVESTMENT: Integrated Core & ICS Own 4.9% Stake at June 30
WORDSWORTH ACADEMY: July 13 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
WPACES: S&P Lowers Rating on 2011 Revenue Bonds to BB

[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings

                            *********

A GOODNIGHT SLEEPSTORE: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: A Goodnight Sleepstore, Inc.
          fdba G.N.S. Enterprises, LLC
          fdba G.N.S. Enterprises/Fayetteville, LLC
          fdba G.N.S. Enterprises/Columbia, LLC
        6502 Market Street
        Wilmington, NC 28405

Business Description: A Goodnight Sleepstore, Inc. --
                      http://www.agoodnightsleepstore.com/--
                      operates discount mattress super stores in
                      Wilmington, Raleigh, Fayetteville North
                      Carolina and Columbia South Carolina.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 4, 2017

Case No.: 17-03274

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of North Carolina
       (Wilmington Division)

Judge: Hon. Joseph N. Callaway

Debtor's Counsel: Richard Preston Cook, Esq.
                  RICHARD P. COOK, PLLC
                  dba Cape Fear Debt Relief
                  7036 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 101
                  Wilmington, NC 28403
                  Tel: 910-399-3458
                  Fax: 877 836-6822
                  E-mail: capefeardebtrelief@gmail.com

Total Assets: $268,696

Total Liabilities: $1 million

The petition was signed by Sonny D. Langley, president.

The Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/nceb17-03274.pdf


A QUIVER FULL: Seeks October 18 Plan Exclusivity Period Extension
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A Quiver Full, Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Georgia an emergency motion requesting for an
extension of its deadline to file a plan of reorganization by an
additional 90 days, through and including October 18, 2017.

The Debtor explains that the U.S. Trustee recently raised the
question about the Debtor's classification as a small business
debtor as per the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtor says that this case
has not been treated as a small business case, but if the Debtor is
treated as a small business debtor, then pursuant to the Bankruptcy
Code, the deadline for the Debtor to file its plan would be July
20, 2017. Accordingly, in an abundance of caution, the Debtor seeks
for an additional 90 days extension to file a plan.

The Debtor also requests a concomitant extension of its exclusivity
period which is currently scheduled to expire on July 24, 2017, per
the Court's Order entered on May 12.

The Debtor claims that it is still attempting to negotiate a plan
with its major creditors, and has just negotiated a deal with its
primary creditor that will put the Debtor in a position to file a
confirmable plan in the near future.

                       About A Quiver Full

A Quiver Full owns and operates a marketing and sales of specialty
goods business at 2715 Arbor Hill Road, Canton, GA 30115. Its
primary business is marketing and selling patented, self-cooling
towels to blue-chip retailers, including some of the nation's
largest amusement parks.

A Quiver Full, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 16-66793) on September
23, 2016.  The petition was signed by Jeff Whitmire, authorized
representative. The Debtor is represented by William A. Rountree,
Esq. at Macey,Wilensky & Hennings, LLC.  At the time of the filing,
the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.


ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES: Names Former LSI Corp Chief to Board
------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. voted
on June 30, 2017, to increase the size of the Board from eight
directors to nine directors and appointed Mr. Abhi Y. Talwalkar as
a director to the Board to fill the resulting vacancy.  The Board
has determined that Mr. Talwalkar qualifies as an independent
director for purposes of the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market as
well as applicable rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.  In addition, Mr. Talwalkar was appointed to
the Compensation and Leadership Resources and the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committees of the Board.

"With a 32-year career in technology, Talwalkar brings a deep
knowledge of the semiconductor industry," the Company said in a
press release.

Talwalkar, 53, was president and chief executive officer of LSI
Corporation from May 2005 until the completion of LSI's merger with
Avago Technologies in May 2014.  Prior to LSI Corporation,
Talwalkar held a number of senior management roles at Intel
Corporation over the course of 12 years, including corporate vice
president and co-general manager of the Digital Enterprise Group
and vice president and general manager of the Intel Enterprise
Platform Group.  Previously in his career, Talwalkar held various
engineering and marketing positions at Sequent Computer Systems,
Bipolar Integrated Technology, Inc., and Lattice Semiconductor,
Inc.

"Abhi's extensive experience provides him with unique perspectives
and insights that make him a great addition to the AMD board of
directors," said John Caldwell, AMD chairman of the board.

Talwalkar holds a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical
engineering from Oregon State University.  He previously served as
a board member of the Semiconductor Industry Association and LSI
Corporation, and he was a member of the U.S. delegation for World
Semiconductor Council proceedings.  He currently serves on the
boards of Lam Research Corporation, iRhythm Technologies, Inc., and
TE Connectivity.

Mr. Talwalkar will receive compensation based on the same policies
as the Company's other non-employee directors, which are described
in the Company's definitive proxy statement filed on March 8, 2017
with the SEC.  On June 30, 2017, Mr. Talwalkar was granted 15,301
restricted stock units.  The grant becomes fully vested and
exercisable on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.

                 About Advanced Micro Devices

Sunnyvale, California-based Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.,
(NASDAQ:AMD) is a global semiconductor company.  AMD --
http://www.amd.com/-- offers x86 microprocessors, as a standalone
central processing unit (CPU) or as incorporated into an
accelerated processing unit (APU), chipsets, and discrete graphics
processing units (GPUs) for the consumer, commercial and
professional graphics markets, and server and embedded CPUs, GPUs
and APUs, and semi-custom System-on-Chip (SoC) products and
technology for game consoles.

AMD incurred a net loss of $497 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, following a net loss of $660 million for the year
ended Dec. 26, 2015.  As of April 1, 2017, Advanced Micro had $3.29
billion in total assets, $2.89 billion in total liabilities and
$409 million in total stockholders' equity.

                       *     *     *

In March 2017, S&P Global Ratings said it raised its corporate
credit rating on Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Advanced Micro Devices to
'B-' from 'CCC+'.  "Our upgrade reflects our view of the Company's
capital structure as sustainable following a series of deleveraging
transactions, a return to revenue growth, and improving, if still
weak, profitability," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst James
Thomas.

In March 2016, Fitch Ratings downgraded and withdrew the ratings
for AMD including the Long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to
'CCC' from 'B-'.  Fitch has withdrawn AMD's ratings for commercial
reasons.  The downgrade reflects prospects for negative free cash
flow (FCF) over the intermediate term and the consequent liquidity
issues and refinancing risk that could develop as the 2019 and 2020
debt maturities approach.


ALBERT EINSTEIN ACADEMIES: S&P Hikes 2013A/B Rev. Bonds to BB-
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its rating to 'BB-' from 'B+' on the
California Municipal Finance Authority's series 2013A and taxable
series 2013B charter school revenue bonds, issued on behalf of 458
26th Street Holdings LLC for the Albert Einstein Academies Project.
The outlook is stable.

"The rating actions reflect the school's ability to materially
improve its financial performance in fiscal 2016, as demonstrated
by acceptable maximum annual debt service coverage and debt service
coverage," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst James Gallardo.
"In addition, the raised rating and stable outlook are based on our
view of the solid improvement in the academy's unrestricted cash
and liquidity. It is our opinion that management actively addressed
the school's previous financial pressures, which were due to an
aggressive enrollment growth plan and a significant increase in
debt, and management anticipates similar financial results in
fiscal 2017."

S&P said, "We assessed AEA's enterprise profile as adequate,
characterized by solid demand with robust enrollment growth, though
enrollment is now nearing capacity, healthy academics, and a
satisfactory wait list. We assessed AEA's financial profile as
vulnerable, with variable operations and liquidity, improving
maximum annual debt service (MADS) coverage, and a manageable debt
burden. Combined, we believe these credit factors lead to an
indicative standalone credit profile of 'bb'. In our opinion, the
'BB-' rating on the school's bonds better reflects the school's
financial profile when compared to those of peers and medians, due
in part to AEA's inconsistent financial trends over the last three
years.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that, during the
one-year outlook time frame, the charter school will maintain a
steady financial profile by continuing to generate positive revenue
over expenses, keep its liquidity at current rating category
medians, and MADS coverage and debt service coverage will remain
stable. We anticipate the school's demand profile will continue to
reflect solid demand and enrollment will remain stable.

"We could lower the rating if enrollment declines significantly,
operations produce deficits, MADS coverage weakens, or cash on hand
decreases.

"We could consider an upgrade if the school achieves and sustains
MADS coverage and liquidity at levels consistent with a higher
rating category while maintaining its enrollment and positive
operating margins."


ALGAR LLC: Hires Gallery 360 as Real Estate Broker
--------------------------------------------------
ALGAR, LLC, seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Massachusetts to employ Gallery 360 as real estate
broker.

The Debtor owns a parcel of real estate and residential building
thereon located at 6 Farm Hill Lane, Hingham, MA.

The Debtor believes that the sale of this real estate is in the
best interests of the estate and all parties in interest. It is
anticipated that the sale proceeds will pay all secured, priority
and unsecured creditors of the Debtor.

The Debtor requires Gallery 360 to:

     a. consult with the Debtor and the Debtor's counsel with
respect to sale of the property; and

     b. perform other services that may be customarily performed by
a real estate agent with respect to the sale of real property.

Gallery 360 has agreed to provide services at, and request
compensation the amount of 5% of the gross price if property is
sold.  The commission will be paid only if, as, and when the
property is sold and the deed is recorded.

Ferdinand C. Lucas, of Gallery 360, assured the Court that the firm
is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Gallery 360 may be reached at:

     Ferdinand C. Lucas
     Gallery 360
     30 Summer Street
     Hingham, MA 02043474
     Tel: 781-749-3797

                      About ALGAR LLC

Based in Hingham, Massachusetts, ALGAR LLC sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No.
17-11303) on April 11, 2017.  The case is assigned to Judge Joan N.
Feeney.  The Debtor hired William Stevens, Esq., as counsel.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$1 million and liabilities of less than $500,000.


ALGODON WINES: Obtains $2.1M from Preferred Shares Issuance
-----------------------------------------------------------
Between May 9, 2017 and June 21, 2017, Algodon Wines & Luxury
Development Group, Inc. issued 206,967 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock for cash proceeds of $2,069,670, of
which Scott L. Mathis, President, CEO and a director of the Company
personally invested $21,000 for 2,100 shares of Series B Preferred.
Holders of Series B Preferred will be entitled to, among other
things, an annual dividend, liquidation preference, conversion to
common stock of the Company upon certain events, redemption if not
previously converted to common stock, and voting privileges.

For this sale of securities, no general solicitation was used, no
commissions were paid, and the Company relied on the exemption from
registration available under Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 506(b) of
Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  An initial
Form D was filed on April 7, 2017, an amended Form D was filed on
June 15, 2017, and a subsequent amended Form D was filed on June
29, 2017.

                       About Algodon Wines

New York-based Algodon Wines & Luxury Development Group, Inc.,
operates Algodon Mansion, a Buenos Aires-based luxury boutique
hotel property.  This lifestyle related real estate development
company has also redeveloped, expanded and repositioned a winery
and golf resort property called Algodon Wine Estates for
subdivision of a portion of this property for residential
development.

Algodon Wines reported a net loss of $10.04 million on $1.52
million of sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a
net loss of $8.27 million on $1.86 million of sales for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of March 31, 2017, Algodon Wines had $7.45
million in total assets, $4.80 million in total liabilities, $1.55
million in series B convertible preferred stock and $1.09 million
in total stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, issued a "going concern" qualification
on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016, citing that the Company has incurred significant losses
and needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and
sustain its operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


ALLIED FINANCIAL: Redemption Right Timely Asserted, Judge Rules
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mildred Caban Flores of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Puerto Rico denied WM Capital Partner 53, LLC's motion
for summary judgment and granted in part and denied in part Allied
Financial, Inc.'s cross-motion.

Allied seeks to exercise its redemption right under Article 1425 of
the Puerto Rico Civil Code. WM purchased the litigated credit from
Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, who had acquired it from the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver of R-G Premier Bank, a
defunct financial institution. WM posits that federal receivership
law preempts the right of redemption and if the Civil Code is not
preempted, then Allied failed to timely reimburse the purchase
price. The Court finds that Allied has timely asserted its
redemption right, which is not preempted by federal law.

In addressing whether Allied timely exercised its right of
redemption under Article 1425, Judge Flores finds that WM's
argument requiring from Allied full tender of the redemption price
within the nine-day period after its alleged price disclosure is
unfounded.

Based on the uncontested facts, WM filed its motion for
substitution on Oct. 8, 2015, in the Local Court Litigation. Allied
notified WM of its intention to redeem under Article 1425 on that
same day. Thus, Allied exercised its redemption right within the
nine-day period.

Allied continued its redemption action before this court and sought
efforts to validate the redemption price. Thus far there is
conflicting evidence in regards to the alleged reimbursement price
and as such, Allied is presently unable to pay WM for the litigious
credit. Once the court determines the reimbursement price, Allied
may proceed with the tender or deposit in court of said funds. In
the meantime, Allied timely exercised its right to extinguish the
litigious credit purchased by WM and therefore WM's first count for
summary judgment is denied.

Turning to the issue of whether Allied's right is preempted by
federal law, Judge Flores finds that WM has not met its burden to
rebut the presumption of the validity of Article 1425.

Regarding Allied's amended cross-motion for summary judgment, it
requests in essence, that (1) WM's motion for summary judgment be
denied; (2) it be allowed to raise its redemption right under
Article 1425; (3) a certain amount be determined as the redemption
price; and (4) WM pay its attorney's fees and costs. Judge Flores
grants Allied's cross-motion for summary judgment in part as to
count one and two. WM's motion for summary judgment is denied;
Allied may assert its redemption right. The remaining counts are
denied because disputed issues of fact exist. The redemption price
is contested and will be determined at trial. Therefore, summary
judgment is not the proper vehicle to address this issue. The Court
shall defer considering sanctions and fees until trial is
completed.

The court shall enter a separate order setting a pretrial
conference. WM is ordered to answer the complaint within 14 days
from entry of this order.

The adversary proceeding is ALLIED FINANCIAL, INC., Plaintiff, V.
WM CAPITAL PARTNERS 53, LLC, Defendant, Adv. Case No. 16-00033
(MCF) Bankr. D. P.R.).

A full-text copy of Judge Flores' Opinion and Order is available at
https://is.gd/VMyX1v from Leagle.com.

ALLIED FINANCIAL INC, Debtor, represented by CARMEN D. CONDE TORRES
-- condecarmen@condelaw.com -- & LUISA S. VALLE CASTRO --
ls.valle@condelaw.com -- C CONDE & ASSOCIATES.

                  About Allied Financial

Allied Financial, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-00180) on Jan. 15, 2016.  The petition
was signed by Rafael Portela, president of the Board of Directors.
The Debtor disclosed total assets of $10.3 million and total debt
of $9.14 million.  C. Conde & Assoc. is counsel to the Debtor.
Judge Mildred Caban Flores presides over the case.


ALLIED UNIVERSAL: S&P Affirms B+ CCR & Alters Outlook to Negative
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' corporate credit rating on
Santa Ana, Calif.-based Allied Universal Topco LLC and revised its
outlook to negative from stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'B+' issue-level
rating on the company's first-lien credit facilities, including a
$300 million revolving facility due in 2020 and $2.3 billion term
loans (we assumed the $100 million delayed-draw term loan is fully
drawn for our analysis) due in 2022. The recovery rating on
first-lien credit facilities remains '3', indicating our
expectation of meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 65%) recovery
in the event of payment default. We also affirmed our 'B-'
issue-level rating on the company's second-lien $245 million term
loan (including $15 million delayed draw term loan) due in 2023.
The '6' recovery rating indicates our expectation for negligible
recovery (0%-10%; rounded estimate: 0%) in the event of a payment
default.

"The rating affirmation and outlook revision reflects our belief
that incremental integration-related costs combined with the
tightening labor market will make it more challenging for the
company to improve its credit metrics and reduce debt to EBTIDA to
the low-7x area over the next 12-18 months. An inability to improve
its credit metrics sufficiently would result in leverage sustained
in the high-7x or 8x area, and the potential that it would not
generate free cash flow comparable to that of 'B+'-rated peers.

"The negative outlook reflects our expectations that
higher–than-expectation integration-related costs and a tighter
labor market will make it more challenging for Allied to deleverage
to the low 7x area in the next 12–18 months.

"We could lower our ratings if the company incurs further
integration-related costs or is subject to unforeseen labor market
issues such as a drastic increase in labor cost that the company
can't pass through to its customers, which would result in leverage
remaining in the 8x area or above. We could also lower our ratings
if FOCF to debt does not improve to the mid-single-digit
percentages in the next 12–18 months or if the company exhibits
more aggressive financial policy behavior such as large debt-funded
acquisitions or dividends.

"We could revise our outlook to stable if the company successfully
completes the integration of Allied and Universal over the next
year and achieves expected margin improvement, such that debt to
EBITDA would improve to the low-7x area and FOCF to debt to the
mid-single-digit percentage area by the end of 2018."


APPLEWOOD CAFE: Hires Andreozzi Bluestein as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Applewood Cafe, LLC d/b/a Apple Wood Cafe & Catering seeks
authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of New York to employ Andreozzi Bluestein LLP as counsel.

The Debtor requires Andreozzi Bluestein to:

     a. advise the Debtor of its rights, powers and duties as
debtor and debtor-in-possession continuing to operate its business
and property under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code;

     b. prepare, on behalf of the Debtor, any necessary and
appropriate applications, motions, draft orders, other pleadings,
notices, schedules and other documents, and review financial and
other reports to be filed in this Chapter 11 case;

     c. advise the Debtor concerning, and preparing responses to,
applications, motions, other pleadings, notices and other papers
that may be filed and served in this Chapter 11 case;

     d. advise the Debtor with respect to, and assisting in the
negotiation and documentation of, financing agreements, debt and
cash collateral orders and related transactions;

     e. advise and counsel the Debtor with respect to any sales of
its assets and negotiate and prepare the agreements, pleadings and
other documents related thereto;

     f. review the nature and validity of any liens asserted
against the Debtor's property and advise the Debtor concerning the
enforceability of such liens;

     g. advise the Debtor regarding its ability to initiate actions
to collect and recover property for the benefit of his estate;

     h. counsel the Debtor in connection with the formulation,
negotiation and drafting of a plan of reorganization and related
documents;

     i. advise the Debtor concerning executory contracts and
unexpired lease assumptions, assignments and rejections and lease
restructurings;

     j. assist the Debtor in reviewing, estimating and resolving
claims asserted against the Debtor’s estate;

     k. commence and conduct any and all litigation necessary or
appropriate to assert rights held by the Debtor, protect assets of
the Debtor's Chapter 11 estate or otherwise further the goals of
completing the Debtor's successful reorganization;

     l. provide tax, litigation and other non-bankruptcy services
as requested by the Debtor; and

     m. appear in Court on behalf of the Debtor as needed in
connection with this Chapter 11 case for or on behalf of the
Debtor.

Andreozzi Bluestein lawyers who will work on the Debtor's case and
their hourly rates are:

    Daniel F. Brown                    $325
    Royston Mendonza                   $250
    Ruth R. Wiseman                    $250
    Melissa A. Brennan                 $160

Andreozzi Bluestein received a $5,000 pre-petition retainer from
the Debtor.  Prior to the bankruptcy filing, Andreozzi Bluestein
billed the Debtor for pre- petition bankruptcy related services and
the Bankruptcy Court's $1,717 filing fee.  Its pre-petition
invoices were paid from its pre-petition retainer.  As of the
Filing, Andreozzi Bluestein held a retainer in the amount of
$1,350.50.

As a part of its pre-petition retainer agreement with Andreozzi
Bluestein, the Debtor also agreed to pay to Andreozzi Bluestein a
post-petition retainer in the amount of $11,717.00.

Daniel F. Brown, Esq., a partner at Andreozzi Bluestein, LLP,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Andreozzi Bluestein may be reached at:

     Daniel F. Brown, Esq.
     Andreozzi Bluestein, LLP
     9145 Main Street
     Clarence, New York 14031
     Direct Dial: (716) 235-5030
     Office Number: (716) 633-3200, Ext. 318
     Facsimile: (716) 565-1920
     E-mail: dfb@andreozzibluestein.com

                         About Applewood Cafe

Applewood Cafe, LLC, doing business as Apple Wood Cafe & Catering,
is a New York corporation which operates a restaurant and a
catering service located in Williamsville, New York.

Applewood Cafe filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case
No. 17-11049) on May 19, 2017.  The petition was signed by Rebecca
L. Morgan, Member.  The Debtor estimated $50,000 to $100,000 in
assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Daniel F. Brown, Esq. at Andreozzi Bluestein LLP.


AVERY LAND: Buying Mohave County Property to Claret for $88M
------------------------------------------------------------
Avery Land Group, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada to authorize the sale of (i) two parcels of real
property, Parcel Nos. 341-05-049 and 341-05-050, aggregating
approximately 620 acres, in Mohave County, Arizona ("Debtor Sale
Property"); and (ii) one parcel of real property owned by NOW
Consulting, LLC, Parcel No. 341-01-010, of approximately 40 acres,
in Mohave County, Arizona ("NOW Sale Property") to Francis Claret
for $88,312,516.

The Debtor and its affiliates, including NOW, own numerous
agricultural parcels of real property spread across the surrounding
area of Mohave County, Arizona ("Real Property"). The Debtor owns
the Debtor Sale Property.  The Debtor owns 100% of the membership
interests in NOW.  NOW owns the NOW Sale Property.  The Affiliates
own the Real Property surrounding the Debtor Sale Property and the
NOW Property.  The sale of the Debtor Sale Property and the NOW
Sale Property are both integral to the sale of the surrounding Real
Property under the Purchase Agreement.

The Affiliate Account Debtors owe the Debtor an aggregate of
approximately $32.8 million ("Affiliate Debts").  The Affiliate
Account Debtors own approximately 19,708 acres of the Real Property
to be sold under the Purchase Agreement, for a total of
approximately $84,637,515 of the Purchase Price.  Upon the
Affiliate Account Debtors' receipt of their portion of the Purchase
Price, they intend immediately to settle the Affiliate Debts by
paying the Debtor an aggregate of approximately $32.8 million in
cash.

The Debtor estimates that it has a total of approximately $8.2
million in allowable non-insider claims filed or scheduled against
it.  The Debtor intends to file its Plan that will provide for
payment in full of the Allowed Claims from the Debtor Sales
Proceeds and the Affiliate Cash Payment.

The Debtor and the Affiliates have been marketing the Real
Property, including the Debtor Sale Property and the NOW Sale
Property, for over two years now.  The Real Property, including the
Debtor Sale Property and the NOW Sale Property, has been listed
with several prominent real estate firms with national and
international client bases.  While the Brokers generated
significant interest in the Real Property, they were not successful
in their effort to secure a buyer.

John Gall, a real estate broker that the Debtor's principal, James
R. Rhodes, has enlisted to market real estate other than the Real
Property, introduced the Purchaser to the Sellers.  The Purchase
Agreement represents the largest land sale in Mohave County in the
past 10 years.  And, despite the huge quantity of acreage sold, the
$4,360 price per acre is well above average.

To assist the Debtor in determining the value of its real property,
including the Debtor Sale Property, it has applied for Court
authority to employ Evan Ranes at Landauer Valuation & Advisory to
prepare the Appraisal.  The Debtor Sale Property consists of two
contiguous parcels of land just south of Red Lake in the Hulapai
Valley, north of Kingman, Arizona.  It has been farmed for alfalfa
in the past, but is not currently farmed.  The Debtor Sale Property
has four wells that have capacity to supply water to other nearby
property.  The main irrigation line systems and sub main irrigation
line systems are complete.  The Debtor Sale Property also has four
pivot pads (without pivots).  The Appraiser concluded that the
Debtor Sale Property has a fair market value of $3.41 million, or
$5,508 per acre.

The Sellers and the Purchaser entered into that certain Purchase
Agreement on June 20, 2017, that First Amendment to Purchase
Agreement on June 22, 2017, and that certain Second Amendment to
Purchase Agreement on June 29, 2017.

The Purchase Agreement provides for the Purchaser to purchase the
Real Property from the Seller for $88,312,516 in cash.  The Real
Property aggregates approximately 20,368 acres, of which the Debtor
Sale Property aggregates approximately 620 acres, and the NOW Sale
Property approximates 40 acres.   

The Debtor and the Affiliates have agreed to allocate an aggregate
of $3,325,582 million of the Purchase Price ("Debtor Sale
Proceeds") to the Debtor Sale Property, based on, among other
things, the Appraisal.  The higher price allocation ($5,647 per
acre for the Debtor Sale Property versus $4,360 per acre price for
all the Real Property under the Purchase Agreement) is justified by
the fact that the Debtor Sale Property is contiguous, and has
irrigation lines, pivot pads, and four wells that can supply water
to other nearby properties.

The Debtor and the Affiliates have agreed to allocate $174,418
cash, or $4,375 per acre, of the Purchase Price to the NOW Sale
Property.  Standing alone, the value of the NOW Sale Property is
substantially less than if included in the Purchase Agreement bulk
transaction.  The costs to improve the NOW Sale Property would far
exceed its fair market value.  The NOW Sale Property benefits the
Purchase Agreement because it is contiguous to the bulk of the Real
Property being sold where the major infrastructure, including
pipeline network, lies.

The Purchaser's purchase of the Real Property (including the Debtor
Sale Property and the NOW Sale Property) includes (a) all rights
and privileges appurtenant thereto (excepting mineral and other
excluded rights), (b) ownership of existing wells, and (b) well
equipment and irrigation pivots.  The Debtor delivered the
preliminary Title Report addressing the Debtor Sale Property and
the NOW Sale Property to the Purchaser on June 27, 2017.

On July 3, 2017, the Purchaser will deposit $88,312,517 cash in an
escrow account as the full Purchase Price for the Real Property,
with the sale of all Real Property other than the Debtor Sale
Property and the NOW Sale Property to close on July 5, 2017.  The
Deposit is nonrefundable.

The sale of the Debtor Sale Property and the NOW Sale Property must
occur on July 14, 2017.  The Purchaser has insisted that $7.5
million of the Purchase Price be held in Escrow until the sale of
the Debtor Sale Property and the NOW Sale Property closes.

The conditions to the Purchaser's obligation to close are:

          a. The Purchaser must be satisfied with status of title
to the Real Property.  The Purchaser has until June 30, 2017 to
give written notice of any title exception that is unacceptable in
the Purchaser's reasonable judgment.

          b. The Real Property must be delivered free and clear of
all liens.

          c. The Escrow Agent must be prepared to close and the
title insurer is prepared to issue the title policy.

          d. The Seller has performed its material obligations on
or before Closing.

Baxter holds the Baxter Claim in the amount of $2,302,000.  The
Baxter Claim is secured by the Baxter Lien against the Debtor Sale
Property.  The Debtor is informed and believes that Baxter consents
to the sale of the Debtor Property free and clear of the Baxter
Lien, with such Lien to attach to the Debtor Sale Proceeds.

Arizona Series 1 holds the Arizona Series 1 Claim in the principal
amount of $42,224.  The Arizona Series 1 Claim is secured by the
Arizona Series 1 Lien against the NOW Sale Property.  The Debtor is
informed and believes that Arizona Series 1 consents to the sale of
the NOW Property free and clear of the Arizona Series 1 Lien, with
such Lien to attach to the NOW Sale Proceeds.

Aside from the Baxter Lien, the Debtor is unaware of any liens or
interests asserted against the Debtor Sale Property other than
$1,812 in Debtor Property Taxes.  It intends to pay the Debtor
Property Taxes from the Debtor Sale Proceeds.  

Aside from the Arizona Series 1 Lien, the Debtor is unaware of any
liens or interests asserted against the NOW Sale Property other
than $193.16 in NOW Property Taxes.  NOW intends to pay the NOW
Property Taxes from the NOW Sale Proceeds.

The sale of the Debtor Sale Property and the NOW Sale Property is
critical to the sale of all the Real Property, which sale will
provide the Affiliate Account Debtors with the means to settle the
Affiliate Debts in cash, and enable the Debtor fund its Plan that
will pay all non-insider claims in full.  Accordingly, the Debtors
ask the Court to approve the relief sought.

The Debtors ask that the sale of the Debtor Sale Property and the
NOW Sale Property be effective immediately by providing that the
14-day stay under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) is waived.

                      About Avery Land Group

Avery Land Group, LLC has been in business since 2013 in the
development of agricultural land and planned residential
communities.

Kingman Farms parent company Avery Land Group, LLC, based in Las
Vegas, NV, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No.
16-14995) on Sept. 9, 2016.  The case is assigned to Judge August
B. Landis.  The Debtor estimated assets at $500,000 to $1 million
and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.  The petition was
signed by James M. Rhodes, manager.

The Debtor tapped Brett A. Axelrod, Esq., at Fox Rothschild, LLP,
as bankruptcy counsel, and The Bach Law Firm, LLC as conflicts
counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


BAIA LLC: Talati Buying Mt. Airy Assets for $7 Million
------------------------------------------------------
BAIA, LLC, and Ridgeville Plaza, Inc., ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maryland to authorize their Asset
Purchase Agreement with Ken Talati, on behalf of an entity to be
formed, in connection with the sale of improved commercial real
properties (i) located at 206, 208 and 210 East Ridgeville Blvd.,
Mt. Airy, Maryland ("Ridgeville Properties") ; and (ii) located at
1401 S. Main Street, Mt. Airy Maryland ("1401 Main Street
Property"); along with furniture, fixtures and equipment used in
connection with the real properties  for $7,000,000, subject to
higher and better offers.

BAIA owns and leases improved commercial real property located at
1311 S. Main Street, Mt. Airy, Maryland and the 1401 Main Street
Property.  Ridgeville owns and leases the Ridgeville Properties.

The Debtors may be the owner of certain intangible personal
property used in connection with the Debtors' ownership,
maintenance or operation of the Subject Properties ("Personalty").

In addition to the Subject Properties, the Personalty and other
related property, the Debtors are parties to certain unexpired
leases and executory contracts, which the Debtors seek authority to
assume and assign to the Purchaser.

The Subject Properties are encumbered by these secured claims:

          a. 1401 Main Street Property

                i. 1st Priority Lien: SF IV Bridge IV, LP: Disputed
Claim of $15,235,404

                ii. 2nd Priority Lien: Deborah Ann Mielke/Holly
Eugenia Hubble: Appr. $275,000

                iii. 3rd Priority Lien: United Bank: $919,254

          b. Ridgeville Properties

                1. 1st Priority Lien: SF IV Bridge IV, LP: Disputed
Claim of $15,235,404 (Cross-Collateralized with 1401 Main Street
Property)

                ii. 2nd Priority Lien: United Bank: $919,254
(Cross-Collateralized with 1401 Main Street Property)

In addition to the foregoing secured creditors, BAIA is indebted to
Carroll County, Maryland on account of real property taxes in the
estimated amount of $107,862.  Ridgeville Plaza is also indebted to
Carroll County on account of real property taxes in the estimated
amount of approximately $43,000.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors retained Marcus and
Millichap Real Estate Investment Services, Inc. to market the
Debtors' properties, including the Subject Properties.  The Debtors
retained Marcus & Millichap post-petition, who contacted potential
buyers, distributed marketing materials and widely exposed the
Subject Properties to the marketplace, receiving expressions of
interest from multiple buyers.  The highest and best offer obtained
for the Subject Properties through such marketing efforts was
$7,000,000.

On June 30, 2017, the Debtors entered into a Purchase Agreement
with the Purchaser to sell the Assets and other rights, titles and
interests for $7,000,000.  The Purchaser is not an insider of the
Debtors.

The salient terms of the Purchase Agreement are:

          a. Assets to be Sold: At the Closing the Seller will
transfer to the Purchaser, free and clear of all liens, claims,
interests, and encumbrances of every kind, all of the Assets,
including, without limitation, the Subject Properties and the
Personalty.

          b. Purchase Price: $7,000,000

          c. Deposit: $150,000

          d. No Assumed Liabilities: The Purchaser will not assume
any of the Seller's debts, liabilities and other obligations with
respect to the Assets and Seller will continue to be responsible
for such liabilities, other than (i) those arising after the
Closing under any contract that Purchaser specifically assumes
under the Purchase Agreement; and (ii) other liabilities, if any,
specified in the Purchase Agreement.

          e. Assigned Contracts: Schedule 9(c) to the Purchase
Agreement enumerates the unexpired leases and other executory
contracts, if any, to be assigned to the Purchaser as well as any
amounts proposed to cure existing monetary defaults.

          f. 9014, and 6004(h), the Debtor seeks authority for the
Sale Order to be effective immediately upon entry.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/BAIA_LLC_111_Sales.pdf

The Debtors are parties to certain executory contracts and
unexpired leases used in the operation of the Assets, including
various tenant leases and executory contracts ("Assigned
Contracts").  The Debtors will make all cure payments, if any, for
the Assigned Contracts.

The Purchase provides for, inter alia, a 30-day Due Diligence
Period.  The Due Diligence begins upon the provision of certain due
diligence documents to the Purchaser, which have commenced. Upon
expiration of the Due Diligence Period satisfactory to the
Purchaser, Court approval is required as a condition of closing.

The sale of the Subject Properties will result in insufficient
funds to pay lien holders in full.  After customary closing costs,
the proceeds from the sale of the Subject Properties will be paid
to satisfy unpaid property taxes securing the Subject Properties,
with the balance to be paid at Closing to SF IV Bridge IV, LP.

Due to the extensive pre-petition marketing efforts and
negotiations between the Debtors and the Purchaser, the Debtors do
not believe that further marketing efforts will yield a higher and
better offer and that the Court should approve the Purchase
Agreement without delay.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Debtors have served the Motion
and notice of the Motion on parties that have expressed an interest
in the Subject Properties, advising parties that they may submit a
higher and/or better offer for the Subject Properties prior to the
hearing on the Motion.

The Sale serves a sound business purpose and should be approved.
The Debtors submit, based on the exercise of its business judgment,
that the terms of the Purchase Agreement are fair and reasonable.
Further, the Sale of the Assets will return a greater benefit to
the Debtors' estates and their respective creditors than any of the
alternatives, including a sale at a later date or foreclosure.
Unless the Debtors are able to consummate the Sale through the
process described, the Assets could be subject to a forced
liquidation by SF.  Accordingly, the Debtors ask the Court to
approve the relief sought.

The Debtor asks authority for the Sale Order to be effective
immediately upon entry pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 7062, 9014, and
6004(h).

The Purchaser can be reached at:

          Ken Talati
          1721 Reisterstown Rd.
          Pikesville, MD 21208

                        About Baia, LLC

Baia, LLC, is a limited liability company organized in 2006 with
principal place of business located in Carroll County, Maryland.
It owns, leases and manages commercial real property located in
Mt. Airy, Maryland.

Ridgeville Plaza, Inc., is a corporation formed in 1998 with
principal place of business located in Carroll County, Maryland.
It owns, leases and manages a commercial real property located in
Mt. Airy, Maryland.

Baia and Ridgeville filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Md. Lead
Case No. 16-26941) on Dec. 30, 2016.  The petitions were signed by
Frank Illiano, president.  

The cases are assigned to Judge David E. Rice.  The Debtors are
represented by James Greenan, Esq., at McNamee, Hosea, et al.  

At the time of filing Baia estimated assets of less than $50,000
and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.  Ridgeville
estimated less than $50,000 in assets and $10 million to $50
million in liabilities.


BEMA RESTAURANT: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bema Restaurant Corporation requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Massachusetts for authority to use cash collateral
of its secured creditors in accordance with the budget.

The proposed Budget shows total operating expenses of $1,765,157
covering the week ending June 18, 2017 through week ending
September 10, 2017.

Massachusetts Department of Revenue filed a tax lien against the
Debtor's property. As of the Petition Date, the DOR was owed
approximately $80,000.

The Debtor owed Rewards Network Establishment Services Inc.
approximately $13,000, as of the Petition Date, secured by a lien
on all of the Debtor's assets pursuant to a financing arrangement.


The Debtor also owed Harold Brown approximately $4,200,000 as of
the Petition Date, secured by a lien on all of the Debtor's assets
pursuant to a financing arrangement. As part of the transaction,
Brown purchased the building in which the Restaurant is located,
alleviating substantial mortgage obligations. In addition, Brown
purchased the business debt owed to Middlesex Savings Bank and to
the prior owner.   

In addition, the Debtor owed Intria Ventures approximately $13,000
as of the Petition Date,  secured by a lien on all of the Debtor's
assets.

The Debtor proposes to provide both periodic payments and a
replacement lien, as follows:

     (a) The Debtor will pay Rewards Network, Brown, Intria
Ventures and the DOR adequate protection in the amount set forth on
the Budget;

     (b) The Debtor will grant Rewards Network, Brown, Intria
Ventures and the DOR continuing replacement liens and security
interests in the post-petition accounts receivable to the same
validity and extent and priority that they would have had in the
absence of the bankruptcy filing; and

     (c) The Debtor will remain within its Budget within an overall
margin of 10%.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated June 29, 2017, is
available at http://tinyurl.com/ycxemrrp

A copy of the Debtor's Budget is available at
http://tinyurl.com/y92xqx7j

                       About Bema Restaurant

Bema is a Massachusetts corporation that owns and operates a Boston
area restaurant called Patrons, which is located at 138 Brighton
Avenue, Allston, MA. It is an affiliate of Sunset Partners, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation that owns and operates two additional
Boston area restaurants: the Sunset Grill & Tap located at 130
Brighton Avenue, Allston, MA; and, the Sunset Cantina located at
916 Commonwealth Avenue, Brookline, MA. On June 7, 2017, Sunset
Partners filed a separate Chapter 11 case, (Bankr. D. Mass. Case
No. 17-12178).

Bema Restaurant Corporation, d/b/a Patron's, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 17-12434) on June 29, 2017.  The
petition was signed by Marc Berkowitz, president.  The case is
assigned to Judge Joan N. Feeney.  The Debtor is represented by
David B. Madoff, Esq. and Steffani Pelton Nicholson, Esq. at Madoff
& Khoury LLP.  At the time of filing, the Debtor had $1.12 million
in assets and $4.45 million in liabilities.

No trustee, examiner, or official committee has been appointed in
this Chapter 11 case.


BIOLARGO INC: Jack Strommen Holds 6.8% Equity Stake as of June 19
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Jack B. Strommen reported that as of June 19, 2017, he
beneficially owns 6,935,577 shares of common stock of BioLargo,
Inc., representing 6.8 percent based upon 94,988,597 shares of
Common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2017, plus the 6,524,286
shares of Common Stock issuable to Mr. Strommen upon conversion of
convertible promissory notes and exercise of outstanding warrants
and options.

Mr. Strommen initially acquired a beneficial interest in Common
Stock of the Company through his investment of personal funds in
series of convertible promissory notes and associated warrants
issued in a private placement by the Company.

The convertible promissory notes acquired by Mr. Strommen in such
transaction were immediately convertible upon issuance, at the
option of Mr. Strommen, into up to 3,257,143 shares of Common
Stock.  Interest on the convertible promissory notes was, pursuant
to the terms of such notes, payable in shares of the Company's
Common Stock on a quarterly basis, and, as of June 29, 2017, the
Company has issued to Mr. Strommen 411,291 shares of Common Stock
in payment of accrued interest under the notes.

The warrants acquired by Mr. Strommen were immediately exercisable
upon issuance, at the option of Mr. Strommen, for up to 3,257,143
shares of Common Stock.

In connection with the election of the Reporting Person to the
Issuer's Board of Directors, the Issuer issued to the Reporting
Person, effective June 19, 2017, an option to purchase up to 10,000
shares of Common Stock.

"The Reporting Person reserves the right to change plans and take
any and all actions that he may deem appropriate to maximize the
value of his investments in the Issuer, including, among other
things, purchasing or otherwise acquiring additional securities of
the Issuer, selling or otherwise disposing of any securities of the
Issuer beneficially owned by him, in each case in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions, or formulating other plans
or proposals regarding the Issuer or its securities to the extent
deemed advisable by the Reporting Person in light of his general
investment policies, market conditions, subsequent developments
affecting the Issuer and general business and future prospects of
the Issuer."

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                      https://is.gd/a21a6x

                         BioLargo Inc.

BioLargo, Inc., is a provider of platform technologies.  The
Company's products are used to eliminate contaminants that threaten
the water, health and quality of life.  Its technology has
commercial applications within several industries.  The Company
focuses on four areas: water treatment; industrial odor control
applications; commercial, household and personal care products
(CHAPP), and advanced wound care.  Its AOS Filter combines iodine,
water filter materials and electrolysis within a water filter
device.  It generates oxidation potential in order to oxidize and
breakdown or otherwise eliminate, soluble organic contaminant,
which are found in contaminated water.

Biolargo reported a net loss of $8.07 million on $281,106 of total
revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared with a net loss
of $5.07 million on $127,582 of total revenue for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015.  

As of March 31, 2017, Biolargo had $1.49 million in total assets,
$3.12 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $1.62 million.

Haskell & White LLP, in Irvine, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company has incurred
recurring losses, negative cash flows from operations and has
limited capital resources, and a net stockholders' deficit. These
matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


BIRCH GROVE: Asks Court to Convert Case to Chapter 7
----------------------------------------------------
Birch Grove Landscaping & Nursery, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of New York for an order converting
its case from one under Chapter 11 to one under Chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code.

Birch Grove tells the Court that it stopped providing services at
the end of the 2016 season when it determined that it would not be
able to fund a confirmable Plan of Reorganization and that it would
be in the best interests of creditors for the Debtor to sell all of
its machinery, equipment and real property.

On March 24, 2017, the Debtor filed a motion, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
Sec. 363(f), seeking:

     -- authorization to sell certain pieces of equipment to
specific purchasers;

     -- authorization to sell its other pieces of equipment and
real property via auction; and

     -- to employ Anderson Auction & Realty Brokers as auctioneer.

The Sale Motion was granted by an Order entered on April 24, 2017.
The Debtor has closed on those sales of the equipment to specific
purchasers approved by the April 24, 2017 Sale Order and its
counsel is currently holding the $53,042.81 in net sale proceeds
from those sales in escrow.

Anderson has sold the Debtor's remaining equipment and real
property via auction.

In accordance with the Court's April Sale Order, the auctioneer has
paid the balance due to Citizens Bank relating to the Debtor's 2015
Ford F350 Superduty CC Pickup
4x4.  The auctioneer also has paid the net proceeds from all
auction sales of all other titled vehicles to the Bank of Akron.

After retaining its fees and expenses, the auctioneer has paid: (1)
all net proceeds from the auction sale of the F350 Superduty CC
Pickup 4x4, after the payment of Citizens Bank;
and (2) the net proceeds from the auction sales of all other
equipment to counsel for the Debtor, which funds are being held in
escrow by Andreozzi Bluestein LLP, pending further Court Order.

Although special counsel for the Debtor, Lewandowski & Associates,
have ordered necessary title and survey work for the closing of the
sale of the Debtor's vacant land to the high bidder at the time of
the auction sale, that real estate sale has not yet closed.

Birch Grove notes that because the Debtor will not be able to
reorganize and confirm a Chapter 11 reorganization plan, the Debtor
requests that the Court allow it to voluntarily convert its case to
one under Chapter 7.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     Daniel F. Brown, Esq.
     ANDREOZZI BLUESTEIN LLP
     9145 Main Street
     Clarence, NY 14031
     Direct Dial: (716) 235-5030
     Office Number: (716) 633-3200, Ext. 318
     Facsimile: (716) 565-1920
     E-mail: dfb@andreozzibluestein.com

             About Birch Grove Landscaping & Nursery

Birch Grove Landscaping & Nursery, Inc. is a New York corporation
based in East Aurora, New York, which provided commercial landscape
design and construction services.  Birch Grove Landscaping filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No.
15-11984) on Sept. 18, 2015, estimating its assets and liabilities
at between $1 million and $10 million each.  The petition was
signed by Jason L. Burford, chief operating officer.  Judge Carl L.
Bucki presides over the case.  

Daniel F. Brown, Esq., at Anreozzi, Bluestein, Weber, Brown, LLP,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel; and Lewandowski &
Associates as the Debtor's special counsel.


BRISTLECONE INC: Selling All Assets in Five Groups
--------------------------------------------------
Bristlecone, Inc., doing business as Bristlecone Holdings, and its
debtor-affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Nevada to authorize the sale of substantially all assets to any
successful buyer to be identified prior to or at the hearing on the
Motion.

A hearing on the Motion is set for July 12, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.

The primary assets of the eight Debtor Entities, calculated as of
the Petition Date are:

    a. Bristlecone, Inc., doing business as Bristlecone Holdings,
has bank accounts with a total balance of $152,188; $0 accounts
receivable; investments consisting of 100% member's interest in
BoonFi, LLC, value unknown; 100% member's interest in Bristlecone
Lending, LLC, value unknown; 100% member's interest in Bristlecone
SPV I, LLC, value unknown; 100% member's interest in I Do Lending,
LLC, value unknown; 100% member's interest in Medly, LLC, value
unknown; and 100% member's interest in One Road Lending, LLC, value
unknown; 100% member's interest in Wags Lending, LLC, value
unknown.

       Bristlecone has office furniture, fixtures and equipment
valued at $119,610 (fair market value estimate); office equipment,
and other office equipment valued at $6,250, leasehold improvements
with a value $0, and intangibles and intellectual property;
miscellaneous goodwill, values unknown; the medical/hearing aid,
furniture, auto, bridal, and pet industry relationships, values
unknown; Barkify.Dog trademark and intellectual property, values
unknown; and all the non-competes from the employment contracts for
all existing employees, values unknown.  Additionally, causes of
action against third parties, including but not limited to,
potential causes of action for intentional interference with
contractual relations against Nextep Funding, LLC; Nextep Finance,
LLC; and Pinogy Retail Services, LLC.  Also, Bristlecone has
secured claims in the amount of $0, and $3,404,036 in general
unsecured debts.

    b. BoonFi, LLC has bank accounts with a total balance of
$3,533; accounts receivable in the amount of $47,417. Additionally,
BoonFi has third party causes of action, including but not limited
to, potential causes of action for intentional interference with
contractual relations against Nextep Funding; Nextep Finance; and
Pinogy Retail Services, values unknown; and potential causes of
action for breach of contract against Nextep Funding; Nextep
Finance; Sam Paul; and Brian Davis.  Also, BoonFi has a secured
claim owing to Monterey Financial Services, Inc., arising from
certain lease contracts, values unknown.  It has general unsecured
claims totaling $3,495, with priority unsecured claims totaling
$3,860.

    c. Bristlecone Lending, LLC has bank accounts with a total
balance of $41,973; accounts receivable total $1,365,942.
Additionally, Lending has third party causes of action, including
but not limited to, potential causes of action for intentional
interference with contractual relations against Nextep Funding;
Nextep Finance; Pinogy Retail Services; Sam Paul; Brian Davis; Rob
Cook and Dusty Wunderlich, values unknown; and potential causes of
action for breach of contract against Nextep Funding; Nextep
Finance; Sam Paul; Brian Davis; Dusty Wunderlich; Saul Perez; Lucas
Combs, Matthew Hack, Doug Harding, LBC Origination, Inc., and Nick
Brewer, values unknown.  Lending has general unsecured claims
totaling $17,570.  It has a secured claim owing to Monterey
Financial Services, arising from certain lease contracts, values
unknown.

   d. Bristlecone SPV I, LLC has bank accounts with a total balance
of $493; SPV has segregated funds held by FRS BC as assignee to
Princeton Alternative Income Fund in an unknown financial
institution in the amount of $1,183,160; accounts receivable in the
amount of $6,573,036.  Additionally, SPV has third party causes of
action, including but not limited to, potential causes of action
for intentional interference with contractual relations against
Nextep Funding; Nextep Finance; Pinogy Retail Services; Sam Paul;
Brian Davis; Rob Cook and Dusty Wunderlich, value unknown; and
potential causes of action for breach of contract against Nextep
Funding; Nextep Finance; Sam Paul; Brian Davis; Dusty Wunderlich;
Saul Perez; Lucas Combs, Matthew Hack, Doug Harding, LBC
Origination, and Nick Brewer, values unknown.  Also, SPV's secured
claim owing, including but not limited to, secured claim owing to
Monterey Financial Services, arising from certain lease contracts,
values unknown; and a secured claim owing to Westminster National
Capital Co. in the amount of $10,549,306, secured by Wells Fargo
Bank checking account ending in 2757; a secured claim owing to
Westminster National Capital secured by Wells Fargo Bank checking
account ending in 2732, value unknown.  SPV has $0 owing to general

unsecured creditors, with an unknown general unsecured claim owing
to Monterey Financial Services.

   e. I Do Lending, LLC has bank accounts with a total balance of
$45,015; accounts receivable are $721,121.  Additionally, I Do has
third party causes of action, including but not limited to
potential causes of action for intentional interference with
contractual relations against Nextep Funding; Nextep Finance;
Pinogy Retail Services; Sam Paul; Brian Davis; Rob Cook and Dusty
Wunderlich, values unknown; and potential causes of action for
breach of contract against Nextep Funding; Nextep Finance; Sam
Paul; Brian Davis; Dusty Wunderlich; Saul Perez; Lucas Combs,
Matthew Hack, Doug Harding, LBC Origination, Inc., and Nick Brewer,
values unknown.  Also, I Do has a secured claim owing to Monterey
Financial Services, arising from certain lease contracts, values
unknown.  It has general unsecured claims owing in the amount of
$9,158.

   f. Medly, LLC has third party causes of action, including but
not limited to potential causes of action for intentional
interference with contractual relations against Nextep Funding;
Nextep Finance; Pinogy Retail Services; Sam Paul; Brian Davis; Rob
Cook and Dusty Wunderlich, values unknown; and potential causes of
action for breach of contract against Nextep Funding; Nextep
Finance; Sam Paul; Brian Davis; Dusty Wunderlich; Saul Perez; Lucas
Combs, Matthew Hack, Doug Harding, LBC Origination, and Nick
Brewer, values unknown.  Medly has a secured claim owing to
Monterey Financial Services, arising from certain lease contracts,
values unknown, and general unsecured claims totaling $0.

   g. One Road Lending, LLC has bank accounts with a total balance
of $43,482; accounts receivable is $2,100,134.  Additionally, One
Road has third party causes of action, including but not limited
to, potential causes of action for intentional interference with
contractual relations against Nextep funding; Nextep Finance;
Pinogy Retail Services; Sam Paul; Brian Davis; Rob Cook and Dusty
Wunderlich, values unknown; and potential causes of action for
breach of contract against Nextep Funding; Nextep Finance; Sam
Paul; Brian Davis; Dusty Wunderlich; Saul Perez; Lucas Combs,
Matthew Hack, Doug Harding, LBC Origination, and Nick Brewer,
values unknown.  Also, One Road has a secured claim owing to
Monterey Financial Services, arising from certain lease contracts,
values unknown.  It has general secured claims owing in the amount
of $33,512.

   h. Wags Lending, LLC has bank accounts with a total balance of
$169,283; accounts receivable is $7,227,559.  Additionally, Wags
has third party causes of action, including but not limited to,
potential causes of action for intentional interference with
contractual relations against Nextep Funding; Nextep Finance, LLC;
Pinogy Retail Services; Sam Paul; Brian Davis; Rob Cook and Dusty
Wunderlich, values unknown; and potential causes of action for
breach of contract against Nextep Funding; Nextep Finance; Sam
Paul; Brian Davis; Dusty Wunderlich; Saul Perez; Lucas Combs,
Matthew Hack, Doug Harding, LBC Origination, and Nick Brewer,
values unknown.  Wags has general unsecured liabilities owing in
the amount of $147,759, with a secured claim owing to Monterey
Financial Services, arising from certain lease contracts, values
unknown.

The secured and general unsecured claims that have been obligated
to by the eight Debtor Entities as of the Petition Date:

   a. Monterey Financial Services, Inc. Receivables Purchase
Agreement dated Jan. 13, 2014, with Wags, and a Receivables
Purchase Agreement dated May 20, 2015, with Wags.  The estimated
total amount owing is $2,103,511, including the secured claims.  A
UCC-1 was filed on Feb. 20, 2014, in favor of Monterey Financial
Services, against collateral consisting largely of all the assets
of Wags Lending.  Additionally, Monterey Receivables Funding has a
filed UCC-1 dated Feb. 20, 2014, secured against certain collateral
of Wags, including all accounts, accounts receivables, chattel
paper, contract rights, rights to payment, letters of credit,
documents and proceeds.

   b. A UCC-1 was filed on Feb. 20, 2014, by Monterey Financial
Services Inc. Profit Sharing Plan And Trust, secured against
certain assets of Wags Lending, including all accounts, accounts
receivables, chattel paper, contract rights, rights to payment,
letters of credit, documents and proceeds.

   c. Monterey Financial Services has a UCC-1 secured with respect
to assets of Bristlecone Financing, tiled on June 23, 2014,
including all accounts, accounts receivables, chattel paper,
contract rights, rights to payment, letters of credit, documents,
and proceeds.

   d. Monterey Financial Services, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and
Trust has a filed UCC-1 secured against certain assets of
Bristlecone Financing, including all accounts, accounts
receivables, chattel paper, contract rights, rights to payment,
letters of credit, documents and proceeds.

   e. Monterey Receivables Funding, has a filed UCC-1 dated June
23, 2014, seeming certain assets of Bristlecone Financing,
including all accounts, accounts receivables, chattel paper,
contract rights, rights to payment, letters of credit, documents
and proceeds.

   f. Strategic Funding, Inc. had a secured claim with respect to
Bristlecone Holdings and Wags Lending secured by a UCC-1 filed on
March 16, 2015, secured  against certain assets, including all
accounts, accounts receivables, chattel paper, contract rights,
rights to payment, letters of credit, documents and proceeds.
Without taking a position as to whether the Strategic Funding claim
has been paid in full, Westminster National Capital purports to
hold an assignment from Strategic Funding, tiled on Dec. 3, 2015.
The Debtors assert that this secured claim has been paid in full.

   g. Westminster National Capital has a filed UCC-1 dated Nov. 14,
2015, in favor of Wags and Wags Lending, including all accounts,
accounts receivables, chattel paper, contract rights, rights to
payment, letters of credit, documents and proceeds.  The estimated
amount owing is $10,895,564, with an estimated general unsecured
claim deficiency of $2,500,000 to $3,500,000.

The Debtors' assets that will be sold in five groups are:

   a. Group #1 Assets: A purchaser to be identified prior to or at
the sale hearing will purchase the following described personal
property assets: Lending lease contracts; and all consumer leases
that Bristlecone owns all right, title, and interest in (excluding
all leases held in SPV) that serve as collateral for Bristlecone's
Receivables Purchase Agreement with Monterey Financial Services,
Inc..  The total value of Group #1 Assets is estimated at $5,000.

   b. Group #2 Assets: Additionally, a purchaser to be identified
prior to or at the sale hearing will purchase the following
described personal property assets: Current Wags retailer
relationships; current One Road retailer relationships; current
Lending retailer relationships; a mirror copy of the retailer
dashboard and point of sale origination software code for each
Wags, One Road, and Lending; the trademarks, goodwill, Internet
domain names, and mirrored copy of the websites for each Wags, One
Road, and Lending; and a copy of all POP materials, a copy of all
advertising materials, a copy of all marketing materials, and the
kiosks for each Wags, One Road, and Lending.  The total value of
Group #2 Assets is estimated at $350,000 to $500,000.

   c. Group #3 Assets: Additionally, a purchaser to be identified
prior to or at the sale hearing will purchase the following
described personal property assets: Certain office equipment;
Intangibles and intellectual property for all eight Debtor
Entities; trademarks for Bristlecone, SPV, BoonFi, Medly, Barkify,
and I Do; for Bristlecone, SPV, BoonFi, Medly, Barkify, and I Do;
the Internet domain names for all eight Debtor Entities, the Google
accounts, websites, custom built communication templates, marketing
source materials and data, retailer historical data, employee
communication history and data legal/compliance records and data,
custom built software platform, custom built Alteryx workflows,
custom built software tools, customized webpages, cost and terms
software; miscellaneous goodwill ; the medical/hearing aid and
bridal industry relationships (point of sale/strategic
relationships); Barkify.Dog trademark, intellectual property,
Internet domain name, website infrastructure and historical data,
POP materials, advertising materials, and marketing materials; and
all the Confidentiality, Invention Assignment, Non-Solicitation,
and Non-Competition Agreements for all existing and former
Bristlecone employees and independent contractors.  The total value
of Group #3 Assets is estimated at $100,000 to $150,000.

   d. Group #4 Assets: Additionally, a purchaser to be identified
prior to or at the sale hearing will purchase the following
described personal property assets: For all eight Debtor entities,
all customer personally identifiable information and historical
data.  The total value of Group #4 Assets is estimated at $5,000.

   e. Group #5 Assets: Additionally, a purchaser to be identified
prior to or at the sale hearing will purchase the following
described personal property assets: All potential civil claims
against third parties listed above in the Statement of Facts.  The
total value of Group #5 Assets is estimated at $650,000.

The Debtors will allow interested bidders the opportunity to
purchase the Assets at the duly noticed sale hearing based upon the
bidding procedures.

The salient terms of the bidding procedures are:

   a. Minimum Opening Bid: Interested bidders for Group #1 Assets
will be required to submit a minimum opening bid of $5,000.  The
minimum opening bid for the Group #2 Assets will be $350,000.  The
minimum opening bid for the Group #3 Assets will be $100,000.  The
minimum opening bid for the Group #4 Assets will be $5,000.  The
minimum opening bid for the Group #5 Assets will be $650,000.

   b. Escrow Deposit: The winning bidder for each group of Assets
will be required to deposit with cashier's check or bank wire with
the Harris Law Practice, LLC Client Trust Account a deposit
consisting of the total sum of the winning bid for each group of
Assets within 24 hours after the hearing on the Motion, which
deposit is deemed non-refundable and forfeited to the Debtors in
the event the successful bidder fails to timely close for any
reason;

   c. Proof of Funds: At the hearing, any interested bidders must
be able to provide adequate proof to the Debtors and the Court of
the ability to fund the escrow deposit and pay the final purchase
price within one business day of the hearing;

   d. Minimum bidding increments: The minimum bidding increments
will consist of no less than $5,000;

   e. Close of Escrow: Any successful overbidder must be able to
close escrow within one business day from of entry of an Order
approving the sale.

   f. Credit Bidding: No credit bids will be allowed.

The Debtors believe that the proposed sale and bidding procedures
will promote active bidding from seriously interested parties and
will dispel any doubt as to the best and highest offer reasonably
available for the Assets.

The Debtors are all currently operating as a going concern.
However, secured creditors Monterey Financial Services, Monterey
Financial Services, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, Monterey
Receivables Funding, and FRS BC as assignee of Westminster National
Capital, are all claiming cash collateral interests in most of the
revenue derived from the Debtors' lease contracts.  To date, the
Debtors have not been able to obtain consent of any of the secured
creditors for the use of cash collateral.  Based on ongoing
operating expenses, the Debtors will most likely run out of cash in
about four weeks from now.  As a result of the nature of the
Debtors' assets that are being sold, they can only maximize the
value of their assets if they are still operating as a going
concern when the assets are sold.  In light of the imminent danger
the Debtors are facing in running out of cash to continue
operations, it is the Debtors' best business judgment that the
assets be sold at this time in the manner proposed.

The Debtors do not believe that any of the assets being sold are
encumbered by any secured creditor, other than the Group #1 Assets
which are encumbered by Monterey.  Monterey will retain its lien
against the Group #1 Assets and those will be transferred free and
clear of any claims, encumbrances or interests other than
Monterey's validly perfected liens.  The Debtors ask authority to
sell and transfer their rights, interests and title in the Assets
to the success buyer(s) free and clear of all liens, claims,
encumbrances, and interests.

At this time, the Debtors are informed and believe that there may
be some insiders of the Debtors that may have an interest in
purchasing the assets.  As indicated in their original sale Motion,
Gas Hole, LLC had originally indicated an interest in being a
stalking horse bidder for Group #1 assets in the original sale
Motion.  However, due to the Debtors' decision to re-group the sale
of assets in different categories, Gas Hole withdrew its offer.
However, prior to or at the time of the sale hearing, there may be
certain insiders that elect to make a purchase offer or bid on any
or all of the Assets.

To the extent that any creditors or parties-in-interest object to
the purchase of Assets by any of the Debtors' insiders, the simple,
fair and open bidding process provides the opportunity for any
interested buyers to acquire the Debtors' Assets, thus preventing
any unfair advantage for the insiders.  The bidding process also
allows for a "market test" of the Assets so that the highest and
best price is obtained from any willing buyers.  The Debtors'
Assets are unique and are difficult to market for sale in any
traditional sense.  As a result, the Debtors will continue to
publish the notice of the proposed sale in publications where they
believe a high concentration of interested bidders can obtain
information on the sale/auction.

Lastly, the parties that the Debtors believe would be most
interested in the purchase of the assets are existing creditors or
competitors of the Debtors which are already participants in these
proceedings and therefore aware of the proposed sale.  Westminster
and Nextep Funding, both parties that the Debtors believe may be
the most interested in the purchase of assets, have had significant
access to the Debtors' records and information and the ability to
conduct due diligence.  Any interested insiders in purchasing the
assets have substantially the same information available to them
that Westminster and Nextep have had.

The proposed bidding procedures and the timeline for the hearing on
the Motion, balance the due process protections of the Bankruptcy
Code with the reality of the Debtors' financial situation and their
need to quickly maximize and realize the value of the Assets.  As a
result, the Debtors ask the Court to waive the 14-day stay under
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) so they act in accordance with the Bidding
Procedures as expeditiously as possible.

                     About Bristlecone Inc.

Bristlecone, Inc. -- http://bristleconeholdings.com/-- develops  
financial technologies to help businesses evaluate consumer
creditworthiness.  The Debtor uses the software to look at leading
indicators, such as bank accounts, social data, and public records
to develop algorithms to make decisions before lending money.  It
develops software to lend directly to consumers and small
businesses.  The Debtor was founded in 2013 and is headquartered
in
Reno, Nevada.

Bristlecone, Inc., and seven of its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case Nos.
17-50472 to 17-50476 and 17-50478 to 17-50480) on April 18, 2017.

The seven affiliates are Boonfi LLC, Bristlecone Lending LLC,
Bristolecone SPV I LLC, I Do Lending LLC, Medly LLC, One Road
Lending LLC and Wags Lending LLC.  The Debtors' cases are assigned
to Judge Bruce T. Beesley.

At the time of the filing, Bristlecone, Inc. estimated its assets
and liabilities at $10 million to $50 million.  The petitions were
signed by Brandon Kyle Ferguson, president and CEO.


CALADRI DEVELOPMENT: UST Wants Case Converted or Dismissed
----------------------------------------------------------
William K. Harrington, the United States Trustee for Region 2, asks
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
convert the Chapter 11 case of Caladri Development Corp. to a
Chapter 7 case, or in the alternative dismiss the Chapter 11 case.


The U.S. Trustee tells the Court that the Debtor has not filed an
operating report since it commenced the bankruptcy case.
Accordingly, it is impossible to determine if the Debtor has
collected any accounts receivables since it commenced this case, as
well as the status of any of such accounts receivables collected.
This failure to provide any financial information constitutes cause
to convert a case to Chapter 7 or to dismiss a case pursuant to
Bankruptcy Code Section 1112(b)(4)(F).

The U.S. Trustee notes that the Debtor's primary assets are
$3,100,000 of unencumbered accounts receivables.  Because the
Debtor's accounts receivables may be a valuable asset for a trustee
to administer, the U.S. Trustee recommends the conversion of the
case to Chapter 7 and appointment of a trustee is in the best
interest of creditors and this estate.

The U.S. Trustee is represented by:

     Paul K. Schwartzberg, Esq.
     Trial Attorney
     201 Varick Street, Room 1006
     New York, NY 10014
     Tel: (212) 510-0500

Caladri Development Corp. is a Peekskill, New York-based remodeling
contractor.  Caladri filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 17-22571) in White Plains on April 14, 2017, listing under
$50,000 in assets, and under $10 million in liabilities.  The
petition was signed by Louis Cali, chief executive officer.

The Hon. Robert D. Drain presides over the case.  Anne J. Penachio,
Esq., at Penachio Malara LLP, serves as the Debtor's counsel.

Due to the lack of creditor interest, the U.S. Trustee has been
unable to form a committee of unsecured creditors in this case.


CANADIAN ENERGY: DBRS Notes Name Change to CES Energy Solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited notes that effective from June 15, 2017, Canadian
Energy Services & Technology Corp. (rated B with a Stable Trend by
DBRS) has changed its corporate name to CES Energy Solutions Corp.


CARRIZO OIL: S&P Affirms B+ CCR & Rates New Unsec. Notes B+
-----------------------------------------------------------
U.S. oil and gas exploration and production company Carrizo Oil &
Gas Inc. announced an agreement to acquire interests in Permian
Basin properties from ExL Petroleum Management LLC for $648
million, plus contingent payments.

On June 28, 2017, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' corporate
credit rating on Houston-based oil and gas exploration and
production (E&P) company Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc. The rating outlook
is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'B+' issue-level
rating and '3' recovery rating to the company's proposed $250
million senior unsecured notes due 2025. The '3' recovery rating
indicates our expectation of meaningful (50% to 70%; rounded
estimate: 55%) recovery of principal in the event of payment
default.

S&P related, "The affirmation incorporates Carrizo's announced
acquisition of properties in the Delaware sub-basin of the Permian
Basin for $648 million plus contingent payment and transaction
funding that includes common equity, preferred stock, and debt. The
acquisition, while fully valued in our view, provides attractive
prospects for crude oil production growth. We expect capital
spending to exceed internally generated cash flow through next
year, but we have increased our production forecasts to reflect
improved operating efficiency, and narrowed the price differentials
to incorporate changes in the company's regional production and
commodity mix. We forecast that Carrizo's credit
measures will remain adequate for our expectations for a 'B+'
rating through 2018. Under our revised base-case scenario, we
forecast that Carrizo will maintain funds from operations
(FFO)/debt in the 15%-20% range and debt/EBITDA around 4x through
next year.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Carrizo will be
able to maintain FFO in the 15%-20% range over the next two years
while spending aggressively to develop its Delaware Basin
properties.

"We could lower the ratings if we expected FFO/debt to approach 12%
for a prolonged period. This would most likely be due to a
weakening in commodity prices, lower-than-expected production, or
higher-than-expected capital spending.

"We could consider an upgrade if we forecasted FFO/debt to increase
and remain above 20% on a sustained basis. This would most likely
be due to commodity prices averaging above our price deck
assumptions."


CARVER BANCORP: Fiscal 2017 Form 10-K Delayed for Review
--------------------------------------------------------
Carver Bancorp, Inc., has delayed the filing of its annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2017.  According to a
Form 12b-25 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Carver Bancorp and its auditor, BDO USA, LLP, are reviewing the
reconciliation of certain general ledger accounts and the potential
impact on the Company's current and previously issued financial
statements.  

The Company plans to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended March 31, 2017, as soon as practicable, but does not
expect that it will be filed on or before the fifteenth calendar
day following the required filing date as prescribed by Rule
12b-25(b) because the Company requires additional time to finalize
its audited financial statements.

The Company continues to review certain items adjusted in fiscal
2017 that it believes are more appropriately accounted for in the
prior period.  It is anticipated that, if the Company's audit firm
(BDO USA, LLP) confirms its analysis, the prior period results of
operations will change by approximately $400,000.

                       About Carver Bancorp

Carver Bancorp, Inc., is the holding company for Carver Federal
Savings Bank, a federally chartered stock savings bank.  Carver --
http://www.carverbank.com/-- was founded in 1948 to serve
African-American communities whose residents, businesses, and
institutions had limited access to mainstream financial services.
In light of its mission to promote economic development and
revitalize underserved communities, Carver has been designated by
the U.S. Department of the Treasury as a community development
financial institution.  Carver is the largest African- and
Caribbean-American managed bank in the United States, with nine
full-service branches in the New York City boroughs of Brooklyn,
Manhattan, and Queens.

Carver Bancorp reported a net loss attributable to the Company of
$170,000 for the year ended March 31, 2016, following a net loss
attributable to the Company of $272,000 for the year ended March
31, 2015.  

As of Dec. 31, 2016, Carver had $698.9 million in total assets,
$647.5 million in total liabilities, and $51.42 million in total
equity.

KPMG LLP, in New York, issued a "going concern" qualification on
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31,
2016, citing that the Company has deferred interest payments on its
junior subordinated debentures through March 31, 2016.  Under the
terms of the debentures, the Company may defer payments for up to
twenty consecutive quarters without creating an event of default.
Payment for the twentieth quarterly interest deferral period is due
in September 2016 and is subject to approval by the Company's
banking regulator.  The auditors said the ability of the Company to
meet its debt service obligations raises substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.


CGG CANADA: U.S. Proceedings Recognized in Canada
-------------------------------------------------
The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench entered an order on June 21,
2017, holding that the insolvency proceedings of CGG Canada
Services Ltd. and Sercel Canada Ltd. ("Canadian Debtors") in the
United States under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code is
recognized as a "foreign main" proceeding pursuant to Part IV of
the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act.  Additionally, the Court
ordered that CGG Canada Services Ltd. be recognized as the foreign
representative of the Canadian Debtors in those proceedings.

Further information with respect to the insolvency proceedings in
Canada and the United States can be found at
http://cases.primeclerk.com/cgg/

The contact details for CGG Canada Services Ltd.:

   CGG Canada Services Ltd.
   c/o Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
   3500, 855 - 2nd Street S.W.
   Calgary, AB T2P 4J8
   Attn: Kelly J. Bourassa
   Tel: 403-260-9697
   Fax: 403-260-9700
   Email: kelly.gourassa@blakes.com

                About CGG Holding (U.S.) Inc.

Paris, France-based CGG Group -- http://www.cgg.com/-- provides
geological, geophysical and reservoir capabilities to its broad
base of customers primarily from the global oil and gas industry.

Founded in 1931 as "Compagnie Generale de Geophysique", CGG focuses
on seismic surveys and other techniques to help energy companies
locate oil and natural-gas reserves. The company also makes
geophysical equipment under the Sercel brand name.

The Group has more than 50 locations worldwide, more than 30
separate data processing centers, and a workforce of more than
5,700, of whom more than 600 are solely devoted to research and
development.

CGG is listed on the Euronext Paris SA (ISIN: 0013181864) and the
New York Stock Exchange (in the form of American Depositary Shares.
NYSE: CGG).

After a deal was reached key constituencies on a restructuring that
will eliminate $1.95 billion in debt, on June 14, 2017 (i) CGG SA,
the group parent company, opened a "sauvegarde" proceeding, the
French equivalent of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, (ii) 14
subsidiaries of CGG S.A. have filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case
No. 17-11637) in New York, and (iii) CGG S.A filed a petition under
Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
Case No. 17-11636) in New York, seeking recognition in the U.S. of
the Sauvegarde as a foreign main proceeding.

Chapter 11 debtors CGG Canada Services Ltd. and Sercel Canada Ltd.
will also commence proceedings commenced under the Companies'
Creditors Arrangement Act in the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta,
Judicial District of Calgary in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, to seek
recognition of the Chapter 11 cases in Canada.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent in the Chapter 11 cases and
maintains the Web site http://www.cggcaseinfo.com/

CGG's legal advisors are Linklaters LLP and Weil Gotshal & Manges
(Paris) LLP for the Sauvegarde and chapter 15 case. The Debtors
hired Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, as counsel. The
company's financial advisors are Lazard and Morgan Stanley, and its
restructuring advisor is Alix Partners, LLP.

Messier Maris & Associes and Millco Advisors, LP, is the financial
advisors to the Ad Hoc Noteholder Group, and Willkie Farr &
Gallagher LLP and DLA Piper LLP, is legal counsel to the Ad Hoc
Noteholder Group.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Kirkland & Ellis International LLP, and De
Pardieu Brocas Maffei A.A.R.P.I, serve as counsel to the Ad Hoc
Secured Lender Committee; Zolfo Cooper LLC is the restructuring
advisor; and Rothschild & Co., is the investment banker.


CHARLES STREET: OneUnited Blocks Approval of Amended Disclosures
----------------------------------------------------------------
OneUnited Bank objects to the approval of the first amended
disclosure statement pertaining to the third plan of reorganization
filed by Charles Street African Methodist Episcopal Church of
Boston.

OneUnited complains that the Disclosure Statement cannot
conceivably give adequate information for the Third Plan of
Reorganization of Charles Street AME because the Debtor's Third
Plan is, itself, incomplete in that it is missing all of the
operative documents to be issued by the Debtor pursuant to the
Debtor's Third Plan should it be confirmed.

OneUnited further asserts that the Disclosure Statement should also
not be approved because the Debtor's Third Plan is patently
non-confirmable for several reasons:

   -- The Debtor's Third Plan is painfully and obviously not
feasible.  The Disclosure Statement provides no information or
explanation as to how a nearly 40% reduction in "All  Other
Operating Expenses" will be effectuated and maintained into the
future (the OneUnited obligations under the Debtor's Third Plan
have a 20 year duration, not to mention a substantial balloon
payment due at the end of 20 years).

   -- The Debtor's Third Plan impermissibly classifies the
OneUnited Deficiency Claim and the Tremont Deficiency Claim in
classes separate from unsecured claims, notwithstanding the fact
that all three (Classes 7, 8 and 9) have the same treatment and
that treatment involves all three sharing pro rata in the same
distribution pool.

   -- The Debtor's Third Plan requires that attorneys' liens
against OneUnited must be decided by the Bankruptcy Court for which
there may be no jurisdiction and/or from which the Court may
appropriately abstain.

In addition, the Debtor makes only conclusory statements as to
feasibility with absolutely no information to show how those
favorable to the Debtor conclusions were reached (or are
reachable).

OneUnited reserves all rights to supplement this Objection and to
make further objections to any amended Disclosure Statement,
especially in light of the fact that the Debtor's Third Plan is
still missing all of its Exhibits and two of the most important
aspects of the Disclosure Statement (the Liquidation Analysis and
Historical Financials) were served on June 2, 2017 and June 5, 2017
and because the Disclosure Statement still contains many blanks.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that under the
Third Plan, the amount of Tremont's Class 3 secured claim will be
up to $450,000.  Meanwhile, the church estimated the amount of
Tremont's Class 8 deficiency claim to be between $100,000 and
$492,000.

OneUnited is represented by:

     Stephen F. Gordon (BBO No. 203600)
     Todd B. Gordon (BBO No. 652482)
     The Gordon Law Firm LLP
     River Place
     57 River Street
     Wellesley, MA 02481
     Tel: (617) 261-0100
     Fax: (617) 261-0789
     Email: sgordon@gordonfirm.com
            tgordon@gordonfirm.com

                      About Charles Street

Charles Street African Methodist Episcopal Church --
http://www.csrrc.org/-- is located in Roxbury, Massachusetts.  Its

mission is to advocate for the needs of community residents and to
strengthen individuals, families, and the community by providing
social, educational, economic, and cultural services.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Mass. Case
No. 12-12292) on March 20, 2012, to prevent its lender, OneUnited
Bank, from foreclosing on a $1.1 million loan and auctioning off
the church.

The Debtor estimated both assets and debts of between $1 million
and $10 million.

The Debtor is represented by the Boston firm Ropes & Gray LLP,
which is working free of charge.  The Debtor tapped AlixPartners,
LLP as restructuring advisor, and Steven G. Elliott as commercial
and residential real estate appraiser for purposes of providing
expert appraisal testimony.

David S. Williams, CEO of Deloitte Financial Advisory Services
LLP,
was appointed examiner.


CRYSTAL LAKE GOLF: Cash Collateral Use Extended Through Aug. 25
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christopher J. Panos of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts entered an order extending Crystal Lake
Golf Club, LLC's use of cash collateral through August 25, 2017,
which is assented to by the U.S. Trustee and Pentucket Bank.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated June 29, 2017, is available at
http://tinyurl.com/yb3k8jld

                  About Crystal Lake Golf Club

Crystal Lake Golf Club, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Mass. Case No. 16-41324) on July 27, 2016.  The petition was signed
by Michael J. Maroney, managing member.  The Debtor estimated
assets at $500,000 to $1 million and liabilities at $1 million to
$10 million at the time of the filing.  The case is assigned to
Judge Christopher J. Panos.  The Debtor's attorney is Richard A.
Mestone, Esq., at Mestone & Associates LLC.  The accountant is
Jeffrey M. Dennis, CPA.


ERIE STREET: Plan Payments Expected to be Made on Effective Date
----------------------------------------------------------------
Erie Street Investors, LLC, and affiliates filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois a first
amended combined plan of reorganization and disclosure statement.

This latest version of the plan now anticipates that all payments
will be made on the Effective Date, that is, 30 days from the entry
of an Order confirming the Plan.

The new plan also adds that the Class 1 (secured claims of lender)
claim is unimpaired, while Class 3 (general unsecured creditors) is
impaired. The previous plan did not provide this information.

A copy of the Latest Disclosure Statement is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-10554-155.pdf

                About Erie Street Investors, LLC

Erie Street Investors, LLC, and several affiliates filed separate
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Lead Case No.
17-10554) on April 3, 2017.  The affiliates are LaSalle Investors,
LLC, WSC Parking Fund I, George Street Investors, LLC, and
Sheffield Avenue Investors, LLC.  The cases are jointly
administered.  Arthur Holmer, managing member of Weiland Ventures,
LLC, signed the petitions.

Erie Street Investors and LaSalle Investors each disclosed between
$10 million and $50 million in both assets and liabilities.  WSC
Parking Fund listed between $1 million and $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge Deborah L. Thorne.  The Debtors
are
represented by Scott R Clar, Esq., at Crane, Heyman, Simon, Welch
&
Clar.


ESPLANADE HL: Can Continue Access to FMB Cash Through Aug. 6
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Carol A. Doyle of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Illinois entered a ninth interim order authorizing
Esplanade HL, LLC, and its affiliated debtors to continue using the
cash collateral of First Midwest Bank through Aug. 6, 2017.

The approved cash collateral Budget covering the period from July 3
through August 6, 2017 reflects total expenses in the aggregate sum
of $36,042 for Belvidere; $27,786 for Esplanade HL; $29,405 for
Esplanade Drive; and $67,478 for 9501 W. 144th Place.

Big Rock Ranch, LLC, has agreed to make monthly payments of $1,828
to First Midwest Bank.

First Midwest Bank is granted valid, binding and properly perfected
postpetition security interests and replacement liens on the
prepetition collateral, in addition to all existing security
interests and liens and held by First Midwest Bank in and to the
prepetition collateral, but only to secure the amount equal to the
collateral diminution. All proceeds of the Prepetition Collateral
that would be subject to First Midwest Bank's security interests or
liens will also be subject to the Adequate Protection Liens.

The tenants of each of the Debtors' respective properties are
directed to pay rents, as follows:

     (a) Belvidere tenants will pay rents to the Belvidere;

     (b) Esplanade HL will pay rents to the Esplanade HL;      
                       
     (c) Esplanade Drive tenants will pay rents to Esplanade; and
          
     (d) 9501 W. 144th Place tenants will pay rents to 9501 W.
144th Place.

First Midwest Bank's liens on and security interests in the
Collateral, will be subordinate and subject only to any unpaid fees
payable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1930 and any unpaid fees
payable to the Clerk of the Court or the U.S. Trustee.

The hearing to consider entry of a tenth interim cash collateral
order is set for August 2, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Ninth Interim Order, dated June 29, 2017,
is available at https://is.gd/91e5pz

                       About Esplanade HL

Esplanade HL, LLC, 2380 Esplanade Drive, LLC, 9501 W. 144th Place,
LLC, and 171 W. Belvedere Road, and LLC, Big Rock Ranch, LLC each
filed chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case Nos. 16-33008,
16-33010, 16-33011, 16-33013, and 16-33015, respectively) on Oct.
17, 2016.  The petitions were signed by William Vander Velde III,
sole member and manager.

Judge Carol A. Doyle is the case judge.

The Debtors are represented by Harold D. Israel, Esq. and Sean P.
Williams, Esq., at Goldstein & McClintock, LLLP.  

The Debtors have requested the joint administration of their
cases.

Big Rock Ranch estimated assets at $500,000 to $1 million and
liabilities at $100,000 to $500,000.


EZRA HOLDINGS: Deadline to File Claims Set for July 31
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York set
July 31, 2017, at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) as the last date and
time for each person and entity to file proofs of claim against
Ezra Holdings Limited and its debtor-affiliates.

The Court also set Sept. 14, 2017, at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) as
the last date and time for governmental units to file their
claims.

All proofs of claim must be filed (i) electronically through Prime
Clerk's website at http://cases.primeclerk.com/ezra/EPOC-indexor
by delivering the original proof of claim for by hand, or mailing
the original proof of claim form at:

a) if by overnight courier, hand delivery, or first class mail to:

   Ezra Holdings Limited et al., Claims Processing Center
   c/o Prime Clerk LL
   830 3rd Avenue, 3rd Floor
   New York, NY 10022

   --- or ---

b) if by hand delivery:

   United States Bankruptcy Court, SDNY
   300 Quarropas Street
   White Plains, NY 10601

                        About Ezra Holdings

Founded in 1992, Ezra Holdings Limited --
http://www.ezraholdings.com/-- is an offshore contractor and  
provider of integrated offshore solutions to the global oil and gas
industry.  Ezra is incorporated in Singapore with its registered
office at 15 Hoe Chiang Road #28-01 Tower Fifteen Singapore 089316.
Its shares were listed on the SGX Sesdaq on Aug. 8, 2003, and moved
to the Mainboard of the Singapore Exchange since Dec. 8, 2005. It
also issued certain notes (S$150,000,000 4.875% Notes due 2018
comprised in Series 003) which have been listed on the Singapore
Exchange since 2013.

Ezra established and maintains an office in the United States
located at 75 South Broadway, Fourth Floor, Office Number 489,
White Plains, New York 10601.  Ezra also has a wholly owned New
York subsidiary, Ezra Holdings (NY) Inc., which was incorporated in
the United States of America with 200 shares at a nominal issue
price per share.

EMITS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ezra, provides supporting
information technology services to each of the Ezra Group's
business divisions.  Ezra Marine, another wholly owned subsidiary
of Ezra, has a leasehold interest in the marine base in Singapore
located at 51 Shipyard Road, Singapore 628139 and leases out the
base's facilities and provides various support services in
connection with the marine base to the Ezra Group's operating
entities.

Ezra Holdings and two affiliates -- Ezra Marine Services Pte. Ltd.
and EMAS IT Solutions Pte Ltd -- filed voluntary Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-22405) on
March 18, 2017, before the Honorable Robert D. Drain.

Lawyers at Saul Ewing, led by Sharon L. Levine, Esq., serve as the
Debtors' Chapter 11 counsel.  The Debtors tapped as general
Singapore counsel Drew & Napier LLC; and claims and noticing agent,
Prime Clerk LLC.

Ezra Holdings estimated $500 million to $1 billion in assets and
$100 million to $500 million in liabilities.  The petitions were
signed by Tan Cher Liang, director.

The Ezra Group's joint venture, EMAS CHIYODA Subsea Limited, and
certain of its affiliate companies filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-31146) on Feb. 27,
2017.  ECS' wholly-owned subsidiary, EMAS-AMC AS, has also been
placed under members' voluntary liquidation in Norway.  

Ezra guaranteed substantial charter hire liabilities of the ECS
Group, as well as certain loans owed by the ECS Group to financial
institutions, Ezra faces potentially significant contingent
liability if the creditors call on the guarantees.

Ezra received statutory demands from Svenska Handelsbanken AB
(Publ), Singapore Branch and Forland Subsea AS on Jan. 24, 2017,
and Feb. 6, 2017, respectively.  These statutory demands have since
expired under Singapore law and these two creditors may commence
winding up applications against Ezra.  Ezra also received a
statutory demand from VT Halter Marine, Inc. on March 9, 2017.


FALCO MOBILE: Needs Until November 29 to File Chapter 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
Falco Mobile Food LLC requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York to extend the time within which it may
exclusively file a plan of reorganization and solicit acceptances
to such plan to November 29, 2017 and January 24, 2018,
respectively.

Pursuant to the Court's Order dated May 19, 2017, the deadline for
the filing of Proofs of Claim in this chapter 11 case was fixed at
June, 23, 2017, and the Government Proof of Claims are due by
August 25, 2017.  As of July 1, a total of three claims have been
filed.

The Debtor contends that it is currently in the process of
reviewing and analyzing the filed claims. While the general claims
bar date has passed, the deadline for governmental units to file
claims has not yet passed. The Debtor will therefore need time to
review and analyze claims filed in this case.

The Debtor maintains that it cannot file a plan without first
determining if additional governmental creditors will timely file a
proof of claim as it will greatly affect the distribution to the
unsecured creditor body.

In addition, the Debtor tells the Court that it is currently
focusing on (a) attracting new investors and generating more income
for the mobile food trucks, and (b) getting financing to
restructure and pay off his creditors in full.  The Debtor claims
that the outcome of these processes would be the key component of
any plan of reorganization filed by the Debtor.

The Debtor believes that once it has a complete understanding of
the amount of outstanding claims and once the Debtor has financing
in place, it will be able to file a plan that provides for a
substantial payment to its creditor body and which plan could be
confirmed by this Court within a reasonable time period.

A hearing to consider the Debtor's Motion will be held on August 8,
2017 at 2:00 p.m.

                     About Falco Mobile Food

Falco Mobile Food LLC sells retail food such as hot dogs, french
fries, fish sandwiches, shrimps and drinks from a mobile unit at
320 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, New York

Falco Mobile Food sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-40860) on February 26,
2017.  The petition was signed by Michael Falco, managing member.
At the time of the filing, the Debtor had $50,000 to $100,000 in
estimated assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in estimated liabilities.
The Debtor is represented by Rachel S. Blumenfeld, Esq. at the Law
Office of Rachel S. Blumenfeld.

The case is assigned to Judge Carla E. Craig.


GENERAL WIRELESS: Intends to File Reorganization Plan by Sept. 5
----------------------------------------------------------------
General Wireless Operations, Inc., and its affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware extend by
approximately 60 days the periods during which the Debtors have the
exclusive right to file a chapter 11 plan, and to solicit
acceptances of such plan, through and including September 5, 2017
and November 4, 2017, respectively.

The Debtors relate that on the Petition Date, they operated
approximately 1,500 retail locations, in addition to their
e-commerce business and dealer network. The Debtors also relate
that over the past four months they have closed or are in the
process of closing most of those stores, and have dramatically
scaled back their operations and employee base pursuant to the
Court's prior orders.

Through the chapter 11 process, the Debtors claim that they have
liquidated most, though not all, of their brick-and-mortar retail
locations. But the Debtors tell the Court that they continue to
operate their e-commerce business and maintain their 425-member
dealer network.

The Debtors contend that they are currently formulating a plan of
reorganization that will center on the operation of an e-commerce
business with a retail web presence, warehouse facilities and
electronics inventory similar to that sold historically by the
Debtors.

Subject to the satisfactory resolution of plan discussions with
certain key constituents, the Debtors believe they can maximize the
value  of their remaining business and assets by promptly
confirming a chapter 11 plan of reorganization.  Toward that end,
the Debtors tell the Court that they are engaged in discussions
with their second-lien lenders and the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors appointed in these cases regarding the
potential resolution of issues between those parties to facilitate
a consensual chapter 11 plan process.

The Debtors anticipate proposing a chapter 11 plan in the coming
weeks. Absent the extensions requested, however, the Debtors'
Exclusive Periods will expire on July 6, 2017 and September 5,
2017, respectively.

As such, the Debtors are requesting a short extension of the
Exclusive Periods while they negotiate and seek confirmation of a
reorganization plan. The Debtors submit that exclusivity can and
should be extended, especially where the debtor, as is the case
here, has made, and is continuing to make, progress towards a
plan.

A hearing with respect to the Debtor's Motion will be held on July
24, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.  Objection deadline is on July 14.

                About General Wireless Operations

Based in Fort Worth, Texas, General Wireless Operations Inc., doing
business as RadioShack -- http://www.RadioShack.com/-- operates a
chain of electronics stores.  Its predecessor, RadioShack Corp.,
then with 4,000 locations, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 15-10197) in February 2015 and announced plans to
close underperforming stores.  

In March 2015, General Wireless, a Standard General affiliate, won
court approval to purchase RadioShack Corp.'s assets, gaining
ownership of around 1,700 RadioShack locations.  Two years later,
General Wireless commenced its own bankruptcy case, announcing
plans to close 200 of 1,300 remaining stores.

General Wireless Operations Inc., and its affiliates based in Fort
Worth, Texas, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case
No. 17-10506) on March 8, 2017.  In its petition, General Wireless
estimated $100 million to $500 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Bradford Tobin, SVP and general counsel, signed the
petitions.

The Debtors tapped Pepper Hamilton LLP as legal counsel; Loughlin
Management Partners & Company, Inc., as financial advisor; and
Prime Clerk, LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

On March 17, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee selected
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as its lead counsel; Klehr Harrison Harvey
Branzburg LLP as local counsel; and Berkeley Research Group LLC as
financial advisor.


GLYECO INC: 40-M Shares Rights Offering Prospectus Amended
----------------------------------------------------------
GlyEco, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission an
amended Form S-1 registration statement relating to the
distribution, at no charge, to holders of its common stock
non-transferable subscription rights to purchase an aggregate of up
to 40,000,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.0001 per
share.

In this rights offering, holders will receive 0.3067 of a
subscription right for every one share of common stock that they
own, as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on July 7, 2017, the record
date.  Each whole subscription right will entitle holders to
purchase one share of the Company's common stock at a subscription
price of $0.08 per share.  The per share subscription price was
determined by the Company's board of directors after a review of
recent historical trading prices of the Company's common stock.
The Company will not issue fractional shares of common stock,
rounded down to the nearest whole number a holder would otherwise
be entitled to purchase.

"If you exercise your subscription rights in full, and other
stockholders do not fully exercise their subscription rights, you
will be entitled to an over-subscription privilege to purchase a
portion of the unsubscribed shares of common stock at the
subscription price, subject to proration and ownership limitations,
which we refer to as the "over-subscription privilege."  To the
extent you properly exercise your over-subscription privilege for
an amount of shares that exceeds the number of unsubscribed shares
available to you, any excess subscription payment received by the
rights agent will be returned promptly, without interest or
penalty.  If all of the rights are exercised, the total purchase
price of the shares offered in the rights offering would be
$3,200,000.  The net proceeds to the Company, after deducting
offering expenses of $25,000, would be $3,175,000.

The Company is not entering into any standby purchase agreement or
similar agreement with respect to the purchase of any shares of its
common stock not subscribed for through the basic subscription
privilege or the over-subscription privilege.  Therefore, there is
no certainty that any shares will be purchased pursuant to the
rights offering and there is no minimum purchase requirement as a
condition to accepting subscriptions.

The subscription rights will expire void and worthless if they are
not exercised by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Aug. 4, 2017, unless
the Company extends the subscription rights offering period.  The
Company may extend the expiration of the rights offering and the
period for exercising subscription rights in its sole discretion.

The Company has contracted with Olde Monmouth Stock Transfer Co.,
Inc. to serve as the rights agent for the rights offering.  The
rights agent will hold in escrow the funds it receives from
subscribers until the Company completes, abandons or terminates the
rights offering.

The Company is not requiring an overall minimum subscription to
complete the rights offering.  However, the Company reserves the
right to terminate the rights offering for any reason at any time
before it expires.  If the Company terminates the rights offering,
all subscription payments received will be returned promptly,
without interest or penalty.

The Company's common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink Sheets under
the symbol "GLYE".  The closing price of the Company's common stock
on the Pink Sheets on June 29, 2017, was $0.075 per share.

A full-text copy of the Form S-1/A is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/vU58ZJ

                      About GlyEco, Inc.

Phoenix, Ariz.-based GlyEco -- http://www.glyeco.com/-- is a
specialty chemical company, leveraging technology and innovation to
focus on vertically integrated, eco-friendly manufacturing,
customer service and distribution solutions.  The Company's eight
facilities, including the recently acquired 14-20 million gallons
per year, ASTM E1177 EG-1, glycol re-distillation plant in West
Virginia, deliver superior quality glycol products that meet or
exceed ASTM quality standards, including a wide spectrum of ready
to use antifreezes and additive packages for antifreeze/coolant,
gas patch coolants and heat transfer fluid industries, throughout
North America.

Glyeco reported a net loss of $2.26 million on $5.59 million of net
sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of
$12.45 million on $7.36 million of net sales for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015.  As of March 31, 2017, GlyeCo had $14.06 million in
total assets, $9.23 million in total liabilities and $4.82 million
in total stockholders' equity.

KMJ Corbin & Company LLP, in Costa Mesa, California, issued a
"going concern" qualification on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the
Company has experienced recurring losses from operations, has
negative operating cash flows during the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
has an accumulated deficit of $36,815,063 as of Dec. 31, 2016, and
is dependent on its ability to raise capital.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


GRAND ABBACO: Trustee Selling All Assets for $1 Million
-------------------------------------------------------
Drew M. Dillworth, Chapter 11 Trustee for Grand Abbaco Development
of Village West Corp., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida to authorize the bidding procedures
and the Purchase and Sale Agreement with GV Nassau, LLC in
connection with the sale of substantially all assets for
$1,000,000, subject to overbid.

Over a several year period, the Debtor and other non-Debtor
affiliates under common ownership ("Affiliates") acquired an
informal assemblage of real property in the Grand Avenue corridor
of Coconut Grove, Florida ("Assemblage").

The Debtor owns the following two lots that are considered part of
the Assemblage: (i) 3384 Florida Avenue, Miami, Florida, Folio no.
01-4121-007-4610 ("3384 Property"); and (ii) 3364 Grand Avenue,
Miami, Florida Folio no. 01-4121-007-4600 ("3364 Property")("Abbaco
Real Properties").

One of the Debtor's Affiliates is Nassau Development of Village
West Corp., which owns four parcels of real property in its name
("Nassau Property") and is also a Chapter 11 debtor before the
Court in a separate Chapter 11 case styled In re Nassau Development
of Village West Corporation, Case No. 15-27691-AJC ("Nassau
Bankruptcy Case").  The Trustee is also the Chapter 11 trustee of
the Nassau Debtor.  Simultaneously with the filing of this Sale
Motion, the Trustee is filing a Section 363 sale motion in the
Nassau Bankruptcy Case ("Nassau Motion").  The instant Motion is
substantially similar to the Nassau Motion, and involves the same
Agreement.

The Abbaco Real Properties are comprised of two separate properties
-- the 3384 Property and the 3364 Property.  Orlando Benitez, Jr.
owns the liens on the Abbaco Real Properties, which encumber both
of the Abbaco Real Properties in the order of priority:

          a. 3384 Property: Miami-Dade County Tax Collector owed
current year taxes

               i. 1st Position Lienholder - Orlando Benitez, Jr.
(mortgage holder via an assignment from BankUnited of its mortgage)
("1st Benitez Lien")

               ii. 2nd Position Lienholder - Orlando Benitez, Jr.
(mortgage holder)("2nd Benitez Lien")

          b. 3364 Property - Miami-Dade County Tax Collector owed
current year taxes

               i. 1st Position Lienholder - Orlando Benitez, Jr.
(mortgage holder via an assignment from BankUnited of its mortgage
- the 1st Benitez Lien)

               ii. 2nd Position Lienholder (disputed) - Orlando
Benitez, Jr. (mortgage holder – the 2nd Benitez Lien)On July 27,
2016, Benitez filed a proof of claim in the case setting forth the
amount of alleged indebtedness owing on his 1st Benitez Lien in the
amount of $485,771.  Thereafter, on June 29, 2017, Benitez provided
the Trustee with a payoff through June 30, 2017, for the 1st
Benitez Claim in the amount of $904,010 ("1st Benitez Claim
Payoff").  Upon information and belief, the 1st Benitez Claim
Payoff is significantly overstated and is therefore disputed by the
Trustee.  Moreover, the Trustee anticipates filing an objection to
the 1st Benitez Claim shortly.  In addition, there is currently
pending an adversary proceeding styled Nassau Development of
Village West Corporation v. Orlando Benitez, Jr., et al., adversary
case no. 16-01241 ("Benitez Adversary"), wherein the Trustee (who
stepped in the shoes of the Nassau Debtor) is prosecuting claims
against Benitez for breach of fiduciary duty and equitable
subordination, the outcome of
which will have the same impact on the 1st Benitez Claim in the
instant case.

On July 27, 2016, Benitez filed a proof of claim in the case
setting forth the amount of alleged indebtedness owing on his 2nd
Benitez Lien in the amount of $7,335,749.  Specifically, and as set
forth in the 2nd Benitez Claim, Benitez has two claims against the
Debtor that are secured in one blanket mortgage by the alleged 2nd
Benitez Lien (which amounts, per Benitez, include interest through
March 26, 2016, and advances for real property taxes from
2009-2015): (i) a blanket mortgage securing indebtedness in the
approximate amount of $7,220,323 ("Note 1") and (ii) a blanket
mortgage securing indebtedness in the approximate amount of
$115,426 ("Note 2").

On June 29, 2017, Benitez provided the Trustee with a payoff
through June 30, 2017, for the 2nd Benitez Claim in the amount of
$12,188,155 (for Note 1) and $565,459 (for Note 2)("2nd Benitez
Claim Payoff".  In the span of one year, the payoff on Note 1
increased approximately $4,967,831 and the payoff on Note 2
increased approximately $450,033.  Upon information and belief, the
2nd Benitez Claim Payoff is significantly overstated and is
therefore disputed by the Trustee.

The security interest collateralizing the 2nd Benitez Claim,
however, is subject to a release price of $1 million as set forth
in that certain Partial Releases of Mortgages dated March 20, 2010,
among Benitez, the Debtor, the Debtor's Affiliates and others.  Per
the Release Agreement, upon receipt of $1,000,000, Benitez is
required to release his Benitez Lien on the Abbaco Real
Properties.

The 2nd Benitez Claim is disputed because it is overstated.  In
addition, the 2nd Benitez Claim is disputed as a result of the
Benitez Adversary, the outcome of which will have the same impact
on the 2nd Benitez Claim in the instant case.  

The Trustee anticipates filing an objection to the 2nd Benitez
Claim shortly.

The existing oral month-to-month lease of Bain Range Funeral
Service, P.A., will be terminated by the Trustee prior to closing
on the Sale.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor and its Affiliates engaged
in marketing efforts to sell not just the Abbaco Real Property, but
the entire Assemblage of properties owned by the Debtor's
Affiliates.  The Trustee cannot opine as to the effectiveness of
the Debtor's efforts except to say that numerous parties have shown
significant interest in purchasing the Assemblage.  Given the
significant length of time that has transpired, the Trustee is no
longer willing to wait for an Assemblage sale. The Trustee has
therefore negotiated with no less than three interested parties for
the sale of the Abbaco Real Property, and given the knowledge of
the marketplace of the Abbaco Real Properties, believes a properly
noticed auction will achieve the highest and best price for the
Abbaco Real Properties sold separately from the Assemblage.

The Trustee, as seller, and GV, as the Proposed Purchaser, have
entered into the Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2017, in
connection with the sale of the Abbaco Real Properties.  The
Agreement seeks to sell the Abbaco Real Property and all personal
property owned by the Trustee and used in operation of the Abbaco
Real Properties to the Proposed Purchaser free and clear of all
liens, claims and encumbrances.

The Agreement provides that GV will serve as the stalking horse
bidder for the purchase of the Abbaco Real Property in the amount
of $1,000,000.  Indeed, the Trustee believes that a single sale of
the Abbaco Real Property as a whole will

yield significantly greater value than separate sales of each of
the Abbaco Real Properties alone.

The Agreement contemplates that GV's offer will be subject to
higher and better offers as described therein, and that competitive
bidding will be conducted at an Auction with an initial overbid
requirement of $55,000 of the Purchase Price, and bidding
increments thereafter of $10,000 (or as otherwise determined by the
Trustee at the Auction).  There will be no bidding for the purchase
of the individual parcels constituting the Nassau Property.

Moreover, the Agreement provides for the payment of Break-Up Fee in
the amount of $50,000 (to be paid from the Purchase Price) to GV if
it is not the successful bidder at the Auction.  This equates to 5%
or less of the ultimate Purchase
Price which the Trustee believes is reasonable.

To the extent that any secured creditors of the Debtor possess any
allowed and perfected liens upon any of the Abbaco Real Properties,
such liens will attach to the proceeds of the Sale.  Unless
otherwise provided by order of the Court, the Trustee reserves the
right to object to (i) the validity, priority, and extent of any
security interests asserted by any entity on the Abbaco Real
Properties, and (ii) the alleged amount due and owing to such
entities.

In addition, the Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions
under which the Proposed Purchaser will purchase the Abbaco Real
Property from the Trustee and also permits the Trustee to solicit
higher and better bids for the Abbaco Real Property.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

   a. Bidder Deposit: $100,000

   b. Initial Overbid Amount: $55,000 ($50,000 Breakup Fee plus
$5,000).  The purchase price will be equal to or greater than
$2,215,000 for the Nassau Real Property and/or equal to or greater
than $1,055,000 for the Abbaco Real Property.

   c. Bid Deadline: three business days before the Auction

   d. Auction: 50 days following entry of the Bidding Procedures
Order at the offices of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff &
Sitterson, P.A. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200, Miami,
Florida.

   e. Bid Increments: $10,000

   f. Prevailing Bidder Closing Date: within five business days of
the required closing date

   g. Back-Up Bidder Closing Date: The closing of the Sale to a
Backup Bidder will take place within 10 calendar days after such
Back-Up Bidder receives notice from the Trustee that the Prevailing
Bidder failed to close.

A copy of the Agreement and Bidding Procedures attached to the
Motion is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/Grand_Abbaco_142_Sales.pdf

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the Trustee,
in the sound exercise of his business judgment, has concluded that
consummation of the Sale to the Proposed Purchaser (or to the
highest and best bidder) will best maximize the value of the
Debtor's estate.  First, selling the Abbaco Real Property as a
whole versus selling the Abbaco Real Properties separately
increases the value of both the Abbaco Real Properties, which in
turn provides for additional funds to pay to the junior lienholder
(to the extent it has an allowed claim).  And second, the Debtor's
majority equity holders have been trying for years to sell the
Assemblage, which includes the Abbaco Real Property.  However, the
Debtor's majority equity holders have been unable or unwilling to
pursue such a transaction to closing.  Accordingly, the Trustee
asks the Court to approve the relief sought.

Given the Trustee's and the Proposed Purchaser's interest in
proceeding expeditiously, the Trustee asks that the Court enters an
Order waiving the 14-day stay set forth in Rule 6004(h) of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and providing that the Sale
Order be immediately enforceable and that the closing under the
Agreement may occur within five business of the entry of the Sale
Order.

The Purchaser can be reached at:

          GV NASSAU, LLC
          c/o Paul J. McMahon, Esq.
          2840 SW 3rd Avenue
          Miami, FL 33129
          Telephone: (305) 285-1222
          Facsimile: (305) 858-4864
          E-mail: pjm@pjmlawmiami.com

The Trustee can be reached at:

          Drew M. Dillworth, Esq.
          2200 Museum Tower
          150 West Flagler Street
          Miami, FL 33130
          Telephone: (305) 789-3200
          Facsimile: (305) 789-3395
          E-mail: DDillworth@stearnsweaver.com

Counsel for the Trustee:

          Peter Russin, Esq.
          Daniel N. Gonzalez, Esq.
          MELAND RUSSIN AND BUDWICK, P.A.
          200 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 3200
          Miami, FL 33130
          Telephone: (305) 358-6363
          Facsimile: (305) 358-1221
          E-mail: prussin@melandrussin.com
                  dgonzalez@melandrussin.com

                  About Grand Abbaco Development

Grand Abbaco Development of Village West Corp. sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
16-14286) on March 27, 2016.  The Debtor is represented by Michael
Marcer, Esq., at Marrero, Chamizo, Marcer Law, LP.

On April 14, 2017, the Court entered its Order Directing
Appointment of Chapter 11 Trustee.  On the same date, the Acting
United States Trustee appointed Drew M. Dillworth as the Chapter 11
Trustee.


GULFMARK OFFSHORE: Plan Outline OK'd, Aug. 1 Plan Hearing Set
-------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved
Gulfmark Offshore's Disclosure Statement and scheduled an August 1,
2017 hearing to consider its Amended Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization.

According to documents filed with the Court, "The Debtor is
commencing this solicitation after extensive prepetition
discussions with certain key creditor constituencies. As a result
of these negotiations, on May 15, 2017, the Debtor entered into a
restructuring support agreement with the Consenting Noteholders.
Under the terms of the Restructuring Support Agreement, the
Consenting Noteholders agree, subject to the terms and conditions
of the Restructuring Support Agreement, to support the Debtor's
financial restructuring to be effected through the Plan. The
Restructuring will leave the Debtor's, and its indirect and direct
subsidiaries', businesses intact and will substantially deleverage
the Debtor's capital structure. This deleveraging will enhance the
Debtor's long-term growth prospects and competitive position and
allow the Debtor to emerge from the Chapter 11 Case as a stronger,
reorganized entity better able to withstand a challenging market
environment facing providers of offshore support vessels and marine
support services to the offshore energy industry. The Restructuring
includes two financing components: The Rights Offerings and the
Exit Financing. The Debtor is also in negotiations with certain of
the Consenting Noteholders to provide exit financing."

                     About Gulfmark Offshore

GulfMark Offshore, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was incorporated
in 1996.  The Company provides offshore marine support and
transportation services primarily to companies involved in the
offshore exploration and production of oil and natural gas.  The
Company's vessels transport materials, supplies and personnel to
offshore facilities, and also move and position drilling and
production facilities.  The majority of the Company's operations
are conducted in the North Sea, offshore Southeast Asia and
offshore the Americas.  The Company currently operates a fleet of
73 owned or managed offshore supply vessels, or OSVs, in the
following regions: 30 vessels in the North Sea, 13 vessels offshore
Southeast Asia, and 30 vessels offshore the Americas.

GulfMark Offshore, Inc. filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Del., Case No. 17-11125) on May 17, 2017.  Quintin V. Kneen,
president and chief executive officer, signed the petition.

As of March 31, 2017, the Debtor listed total assets of $1.07
billion and total debt of $737,131,000.

Mark D. Collins, Esq., Zachary I. Shapiro, Esq., Brett M. Haywood,
Esq. and Christopher M. De Lillo, Esq., of Richards, Layton &
Finger, P.A., as well as Gary T. Holtzer, Esq., Ronit J. Berkovish,
Esq., and Debora A. Hoehne, Esq., of Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
serve as counsel to the Debtor.  The Debtor has also tapped Blank
Rome LLP as corporate counsel; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC
as financial advisor; Evercore Group L.L.C. as investment banker;
Ernst & Young LLP as restructuring consultant; KPMG US LLP as
auditor and tax consultant; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and
noticing agent.


H & M ART: US Trustee Wants Case Converted or Dismissed
-------------------------------------------------------
William K. Harrington, the United States Trustee for Region 2, asks
the Hon. Martin Glenn of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York, for an order converting the Chapter 11 case
of H & M Art and Home Decor, Inc., to a Chapter 7 case, or,
alternatively, dismissing the Chapter 11 case.

The Court will hold a hearing on the request on July 26, 2017, at
11:00 a.m.

The U.S. Trustee tells the Court that the Debtor has been under
bankruptcy protection since February 2017.  The Debtor has not
filed a bankruptcy-exit plan, and has done little to move this case
forward.  The Debtor has filed no monthly operating reports.  Most
recently, the State of New York has filed an administrative claim
in the amount of $3,648.40 for failure to pay taxes.  At this time,
it is unclear whether the Debtor is able to reorganize.

"While the Debtor should have a fair opportunity to restructure its
finances, the Debtor must also meet its obligations under the
Bankruptcy Code," the U.S. Trustee says.

The Debtor is a tenant under a lease at the premises located at
17-19 East 125th Street, New York, New York 10035.  The Premises
serves as the location of a wholesale and retail art gallery, a
professional frame shop, and now has a cafe component that offers
food items.

On March 10, 2017, the Debtor's landlord filed a motion for relief
from the automatic stay to enforce a warrant of eviction and pursue
its state law remedies.  On April 7, 2017, the Debtor filed an
objection to the Landlord's motion for relief from the automatic
stay, arguing that "the automatic stay protects a debtor's
possessory interest in a leasehold and prevents the execution of a
warrant" if state law allows the debt to be cured before execution
of the warrant.

On April 14, 2017, the Court granted the Landlord's request to lift
the automatic stay, but only to permit the Debtor to return to
state court to seek to vacate the warrant of eviction that had been
issued.

The Debtor and the Landlord have been in communications regarding a
possible resolution of their disputes, but to date the Debtor has
not filed a motion to settle the claims or otherwise filed a plan.

The U.S. Trustee is represented by:

     Greg M. Zipes
     Trial Attorney
     201 Varick Street, Room 1006
     New York, New York 10014
     Tel: (212) 510-0500
     Fax: (212) 668-2255

H & M Art and Home Decor, Inc., an art gallery and cafe, filed a
Chapter 11 bankruptcy case (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-10426) on
February 27, 2017, listing under $1 million in assets and
liabilities.  Thomas A. Farinella, Esq., at the Law Offices of
Thomas A. Farinella, PC, serves as the Debtor's counsel.


HALFWAY TO CONCORD: US Trustee Wants Case Converted or Dismissed
----------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew R. Vara, the Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, asks
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
to enter an Order converting the Chapter 11 case of Halfway to
Concord, Inc., to Chapter 7, or in the alternative, dismissing the
case.

The U.S. Trustee tells the Court that the Debtor:

     -- has failed to pay all quarterly fees owed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. Sec. 1930;

     -- has failed to file all operating reports;

     -- has caused unreasonable delay that is prejudicial to
creditors; and

     -- is unable to effectuate a plan of reorganization.

The Acting United States Trustee, Region 3, is represented by:

     Kevin P. Callahan, Esq.
     Trial Attorney
     Office of the U.S. Trustee
     833 Chestnut Street, Suite 500
     Philadelphia, PA 19107
     Telephone: (215) 597-4411
     Facsimile: (215) 597-5795

                   About Halfway To Concord Inc.

Halfway To Concord, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 17-12784) on April 20,
2017.  The petition was signed by Dominic DiVentura, owner.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of
less than $500,000.  The Law Firm of Watson LLC serves as counsel
to the Debtor.


HARDROCK HDD: Directed to Pay $1,583 Over 5 Yrs to People's United
------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 10, 2017, People's United Equipment Finance Corp. filed a
Motion for Relief From the Automatic Stay and/or Adequate
Protection, saying People's United holds a secured claim against
two of the Debtors, HardRock HDD, Inc. and Patrick Leasing.

The Motion asks the Bankruptcy Court to lift the automatic stay so
that People's United may enforce its security interest in certain
equipment owned by HardRock and Patrick Leasing. In the
alternative, the Motion requests that if the Court does not lift
the automatic stay, the Court order HardRock and Patrick Leasing to
provide People's United with adequate protection for its interest
in the equipment.

Judge Phillip J. Shefferly of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan grants the motion in part by lifting
the automatic stay as to some of the equipment and leaving the
automatic stay in place as to the other equipment, conditioned on
adequate protection payments.

The Motion states that it seeks relief from the automatic stay
under section 362(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, and adequate
protection under section 361 of the Bankruptcy Code. However, after
HardRock and Patrick Leasing filed their response, People's United
filed a reply that cites section 362(d)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Further, at the evidentiary hearing, both sides adduced evidence
regarding the elements of section 362(d)(2), and made legal
arguments regarding section 362(d)(2) as well as section 362(d)(1).


Therefore, the Court construes the Motion as seeking relief under
both section 362(d)(1) and (2), as well as adequate protection
under section 361. Section section 362(g) of the Bankruptcy Code
allocates the burden of proof for any hearing concerning relief
from the stay under section 362(d):

   (1) The party requesting such relief has the burden of proof on
the issue of the debtor's equity in property; and

   (2) The party opposing such relief has the burden of proof on
all other issues.

To prevail under section 362(d)(2), HardRock and Patrick Leasing
need not prove that they presently have a feasible, confirmable
plan of reorganization. They need only prove that there is a
reorganization in prospect. Judge Shefferly states that they have
met that burden.

Witness Jeffery Patrick provided uncontroverted testimony about
HardRock's existing work, HardRock's bidding on new work, and
HardRock's rental revenue from Miller Pipeline. In addition,
Jeffery testified without contradiction that all of the Equipment,
some of which is owned by HardRock, and some of which is owned by
Patrick Leasing, is necessary for the continued business operations
of both HardRock and Patrick Leasing. At this early stage of these
Chapter 11 cases, that is enough to show that HardRock and Patrick
Leasing have a reorganization that is in prospect. Therefore,
theCourt will not lift the stay under section 362(d)(2).

While the record supports a finding that there is cause to grant
relief from the automatic stay to permit People's United to recover
the Vactor, the evidence does not establish cause to lift the
automatic stay for People's United with respect to the remaining
Equipment. Neither HardRock nor Patrick Leasing are renting out the
Trailers or the Freightliner in violation of the Security
Agreement. The evidence shows that they are intending to use those
items of Equipment in the continued operation of their business as
they attempt to reorganize in Chapter 11. Therefore, Judge
Shefferly will lift the automatic stay under section 362(d)(1) to
permit People's United to recover the Vactor, but not lift the
automatic stay to permit People's United to recover the Trailers
and the Freightliner.

Regarding Section 361 of the Bankruptcy Code titled adequate
protection, the record shows that HardRock and Patrick Leasing
intend to use the Trailers and Freightliner going forward, and that
they have insurance for them. That protects People's United from
loss or destruction of the Equipment. But there is no specific
evidence in the record to show the amount by which the Trailers and
the Freightliner will diminish in value as HardRock and Patrick
Leasing use them in their business going forward. The only evidence
in the record relevant to this issue consists of the competing
testimony of Jeffery and Cannici regarding the useful life of the
Equipment.

The Trailer and the Freightliner have a value of $95,000.
Amortizing that amount over five years requires monthly payments of
$1,583. The Court finds that a monthly cash payment in that amount
is warranted under section 361(1) to provide People's United with
adequate protection of its interest in the Trailers and the
Freightliner.

The Court will enter a separate order granting the Motion in part.

A full-text copy of Judge Shefferly Opinion is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb17-46425-83.pdf

                   About Hardrock HDD

Hardrock HDD, Inc., is a privately held utility contractor based
in
Jackson, Michigan.

Affiliates HardRock HDD, Inc. (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.
17-46425), Patrick Leasing, L.L.C. (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.
17-46440), and Patrick Horizontal Drilling, L.L.C. (Bankr. E.D.
Mich. Case No. 17-46446) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection
on April 28, 2017.  The petitions were signed by Jeffery Patrick,
authorized agent.

Judge Phillip J. Shefferly presides over the cases.

Thomas R. Morris, Esq., at Silverman & Morris, P.L.L.C., serves as
the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

HardRock HDD estimated assets and liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million.  Patrick Leasing estimated assets between
$500,000
and $1 million and liabilities  between $1 million and $10
million.

Patrick Horizontal estimated its assets at between $100,000 and
$500,000 and liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.


HARVEST CCP: Hires Goldstein Bershad as Attorney
------------------------------------------------
Harvest CCP, LLC has filed an ex-parte motion from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to employ
Goldstein Bershad & Fried, PC as attorneys for the  Debtor.

The Debtor requires Goldstein Bershad to:

     a. advise the Debtor on legal issues relating to the Chapter
11 process;

     b. negotiate with creditors;

     c. prepare the Chapter 11 Plan; and

     d. deal with legal issues that may arise in this case.

Goldstein Bershad will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys             $400
     Paralegals            $75

Goldstein Bershad has received a total retainer of $3,000.

Scott M. Kwiatkowski, Esq., at Goldstein Bershad & Fried, PC,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Goldstein Bershad may be reached at:

     Scott M. Kwiatkowski, Esq.
     Goldstein Bershad & Fried, PC
     400 Town Center, Suite 1200
     Southfield, MI 48075
     Tel: (248) 355-5300
     E-mail: scott@bk-lawyer.net

              About Harvest CCP, LLC

Harvest CCP, LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
E.D. Mich. Case No. 17-46596) on May 1, 2017. Matthew W. Frank,
Esq., at Frank & Frank, PLLC serves as bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtor's assets and liabilities are both below $1 million.


HAVEN REAL ESTATE: August 1 Plan, Disclosure Statement Hearing
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jack B. Schmetterer of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois will convene a hearing on August 1,
2017, at 11:00 p.m. to consider the adequacy of Heaven Real Estate
Focus Fund LP's amended disclosure statement and amended plan of
reorganization.

July 25, 2017, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the amended disclosure statement or to
confirmation of the amended plan.

July 25, 2017, is fixed as the last day for filing written
acceptances or rejections of the amended plan.

                      About Haven Real

Haven Real Estate Focus Fund LP sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N. D. Ill. Case No. 16-35511) on
Nov. 7, 2016.  The petition was signed by Albert Adriani, manager.

The case is assigned to Judge Pamela S. Hollis.  The Debtor hires
Springer Brown, LLC, as legal counsel.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less
than
$50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.


HOME CAPITAL: DBRS Ratings Still Under Review on Neg. Implications
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited June 22, 2017, maintained the ratings of Home Capital
Group Inc. (HCG or the Group) and of its primary operating
subsidiary, Home Trust Company (HTC or the Trust Company), Under
Review with Negative Implications where they were placed on May 3,
2017.

This action follows HCG's announcement that Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
(Berkshire) has agreed to indirectly acquire $400 million of the
Group's common shares on a private-placement basis and to provide a
new $2.0 billion line of credit through a wholly owned subsidiary
of Berkshire. The initial investment of approximately $153 million
is subject to the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) accepting the notice
of investment with an exemption from the requirement to obtain
shareholder approval pursuant to the "financial hardship"
provisions of the TSX Company Manual. This process is expected to
be completed by June 29, 2017. An additional investment of
approximately $247 million would be subject to shareholder approval
at a special meeting expected to take place in September 2017.
Together, the two investments would result in Berkshire indirectly
owning approximately 38.39% of HCG.

In addition, the Group will draw on the proposed new line of credit
to repay all outstanding amounts on the Healthcare of Ontario
Pension Plan facility that currently stand at $1.65 billion. The
new credit facility has substantially the same terms as the
existing facility, but with slightly lower interest rates.

DBRS views today's developments as positive for HCG, given the
reputational backing of an investor such as Berkshire; however,
DBRS notes that the capital injection that the investment would
provide is not significant relative to the Group's liquidity and
funding needs. Furthermore, the new credit facility replaces the
existing facility with only somewhat better terms. As such, DBRS
continues to review the Group's ongoing viability in light of
uncertainty regarding deposit outflows and will evaluate any
further steps that HCG takes to stabilize its liquidity and funding
profile at a reasonable cost, including the potential sale or
securitization of assets. Another consideration is the Group's
ability to finalize the hiring of key senior management and repair
any adverse impacts on its franchise caused by developments since
April 2017.

RATING DRIVERS

Ratings could be lowered if HCG is unable to stem deposit outflows
and obtain funding at a reasonable cost.

Conversely, the trend on the ratings could revert to Stable if the
Group is able to stabilize its funding and liquidity profile while
demonstrating a clear path to sustainable profitability.

A full text copy of the ratings is available free at:

                             https://is.gd/qXvdjX


INTERLEUKIN GENETICS: To Fire 5 of 8 Employees to Cut Costs
------------------------------------------------------------
Interleukin Genetics, Inc. announced that it will pursue strategic
alternatives for the Company and will reduce the Company's
workforce by five employees (63%) as part of a plan to reduce
operating costs.

"While this decision was extremely difficult, it is important to
preserve capital as we assess our options," said Mark Carbeau,
chief executive officer of Interleukin Genetics.  "I and the other
Board members are personally grateful to our departing employees
and the exceptional team members throughout the history of the
Company who have advanced the contributions that Interleukin
Genetics has made to precision medicine and to the advancement of
inflammation science broadly."

The Company was unable to secure a clinical services agreement
satisfactory to Horizon Technology Finance, its senior lender, to
extend deferral of its debt payment obligations to Horizon pursuant
to the amendments made in April 2017 to the Company's arrangements
with Horizon.  As part of the restructuring, the Company also
announced that it is shutting down its ILUSTRATM Inflammation
Management Program and will suspend test processing over the
ensuing approximately two months.  The Company is currently
evaluating all strategic alternatives, including the potential sale
of the company or any or all of its assets, another business
combination or collaboration, and/or an orderly wind down and
liquidation of the Company.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had cash on hand of approximately
$925,000.  Management believes its principal assets are its CLIA
certified laboratory operations and its intellectual property
relating to the ILUSTRA program, cardiovascular disease test,
osteoarthrosis test and the Inherent Health tests.

Total indebtedness was approximately $5.6 million, including
secured debt obligations of approximately $4.9 million, accounts
payable and contractual severance obligations.  As a result of the
restructuring, the Company expects to incur aggregate expenses of
approximately $245,000 consisting of cash severance payments and
accrued vacation payments and costs associated with suspending its
testing programs.

As a result of these developments, the Company will likely not be
able to file its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2017, on a timely basis, and intends to file a Form
12b-25 to that effect.

              About Interleukin Genetics, Inc.

Interleukin Genetics, Inc. (OTCQB: ILIU) develops and markets
proprietary genetic tests for chronic inflammatory diseases and
health-related conditions, with significant expertise in metabolism
and inflammation.  The Company's tests provide information that is
not otherwise available, to empower individuals and their
healthcare providers to manage their health and wellness through
genetics-based insights and actionable guidance, including
pharmacogenomics information to guide development and use of
therapeutics. Interleukin Genetics' lead products include its
proprietary cardiovascular test to guide treatment of high risk
patients; its proprietary ILUSTRA Inflammation Management Program;
and its Inherent Health line of genetic tests.  Interleukin
Genetics is headquartered in suburban Boston and operates an
on-site DNA testing laboratory certified under the Clinical
Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA).  For more information,
please visit www.ilgenetics.com.

Interleukin Genetics reported a net loss of $7.4 million on $2.5
million total revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, following a
net loss of $7.89 million on $1.44 million of total revenue in
2015, and a net loss of $6.33 million on $1.81 million of total
revenue in 2014.  As of March 31, 2017, Interleukin had $1.90
million in total assets, $6.91 million in total liabilities and a
total stockholders' deficit of $5.01 million.

Grant Thornton LLP issued a "going concern" qualification on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.
It said, "The Company has incurred recurring losses and negative
cash flows from operations and as of December 31, 2016 the
Company's current liabilities exceeded its current assets.  These
conditions, among others, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern."


INTERNATIONAL SHIPHOLDING: Chap. 11 Plan Declared Effective on July
-------------------------------------------------------------------
International Shipholding Corporation, et al., have hit their
target of consummating their Chapter 11 Plan by July 3, 2017.  The
Debtors' plan has been declared effective.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
confirmed the Debtors' First Amended Modified Joint Chapter 11 Plan
of Reorganization on March 2, 2017.

The Company emerges from bankruptcy as a subsidiary of SEACOR
Holdings Inc.

As previously reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, the
Company related that the Plan provides for, among other things, (i)
the issuance of new equity in the reorganized Company to SEACOR in
exchange for a $10.5 million cash infusion from SEACOR and the
conversion of $18.1 million in outstanding debtor-in-possession
financing claims to equity, (ii) $25 million in a new senior debt
exit facility, a substantial majority of which will be used to
satisfy creditor claims under the Plan, (iii) the purchase and
transfer by the Company of two leased pure car/truck carrier
vessels, together with the transfer of additional pure car/truck
carrier vessels currently owned by the Company, to NYK Group
Americas Inc. (or its nominee), (iv) the sale of certain vessels
not being transferred to SEACOR, and (v) assumption of certain of
the Company's key pre-petition contracts.  The Plan also reflects a
settlement reached between the unsecured creditors committee and
the Company with respect to the treatment of the general unsecured
claims allowed under the Plan. As part of the settlement, in
addition to substantial payments made to unsecured creditors in
accordance with various court orders, a trust will be formed for
the benefit of certain general unsecured creditors to be funded
with $3.0 million of cash and certain causes of action.  The Plan
does not provide for a distribution to the preferred or common
shareholders of the Company.

               About International Shipholding

International Shipholding Corp. filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-12220) on July 31, 2016.  Its
affiliated
debtors also filed separate Chapter 11 petitions.  The petitions
were signed by Manuel G. Estrada, vice president and chief
financial officer.

International Shipholding Corp. was engaged in waterborne cargo
transportation and maintained a diversified customer base with
emphasis on medium and long term contracts.  ISH was founded in
1947 when the Johnsen family purchased a Liberty Ship after the
establishment of the War Ship Act of 1946 and became a public
company in 1979.  Through its debtor and non-debtor subsidiaries,
International Shipholding now operates a diversified fleet of 21
U.S. and foreign flag vessels that provide domestic and
international maritime transportation services to commercial and
governmental customers primarily under medium to long-term
contracts.  As of the Petition Date, International Shipholding
maintained offices in Mobile, Alabama, New Orleans, Louisiana, New
York, New York, and Tampa, Florida, as well as a network of
agencies in major cities worldwide.

ISH, which was formed as a Delaware corporation in 1978 and became
a public company in 1979, is the ultimate corporate parent of the
International Shipholding family of companies. International
Shipholding's fleet is operated by ISH's principal Debtor and
non-Debtor subsidiaries, including Central Gulf Lines, Inc.,
Waterman Steamship Corporation, Enterprise Ship Company, Inc.,
U.S. United Ocean Services, LLC, CG Railway, Inc., LCI
Shipholdings,
Inc., Sulphur Carriers, Inc., and East Gulf Shipholding, Inc.  

Certain other of ISH's Debtor subsidiaries, including LMS
Shipmanagement, Inc. and N. W. Johnsen & Co., Inc., provide ship
management, ship charter brokerage, agency and other specialized
services. C.G. Railway Inc., Cape Holding LTD, Dry Bulk Cape
Holding, Inc., East Gulf Shipholding, Inc., MPV Netherlands C.V.,
MPV Netherlands Cooperatief U.A., MPV Netherlands B.V., Bulk
Shipholding Inc., and Terminales Transgolfo S.A. de C.V. are not
debtors in these Chapter 11 cases.

The Debtors are represented by David H. Botter, Esq., Sarah Link
Schultz, Esq., and Travis A. McRoberts, Esq., at Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld LLP. The Debtors' Restructuring Advisor is Blackhill
Partners, LLC. Their Claims, Noticing & Balloting Agent is Prime
Clerk LLC.

The Debtors disclosed total assets at $305.1 million and total
debts at $226.8 million as of March 31, 2016.

William K. Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for the Southern District
of New York, on Sept. 1, 2016, appointed three creditors to serve
on the official committee of unsecured creditors of International
Shipholding Corporation.  The committee retained Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP as counsel, and AMA Capital Partners, LLC as
financial advisor.

                          *     *     *

On Oct. 28, 2016, the Debtors filed a motion to sell certain
assets contained in the Specialty Business Segment.  On Nov. 18,
2016, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the bidding
and auction procedures in connection with such sale.  The auction
was held on Dec. 15, 2016.  The Bankruptcy Court held a hearing
to consider approval of the sale on Dec. 20.  On Jan. 30,
2017, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order authorizing the sale.
The sale closed on Feb. 28, 2017.

On Nov. 14, 2016, the Debtors filed their Plan of Reorganization
and the Disclosure Statement.  The Bankruptcy Court approved the
Disclosure Statement on January 10, 2017.  On March 2, 2017, the
Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Plan.


INTREPID POTASH: Prepays $23 Million Notes Under 2016 NPA
---------------------------------------------------------
Intrepid Potash, Inc., entered into a Fourth Amendment to Amended
and Restated Note Purchase Agreement with certain noteholders on
June 30, 2017, which amends the Amended and Restated Note Purchase
Agreement, dated as of Oct. 30, 2016, by and among Intrepid and the
Noteholders.

The NPA Amendment provides for (1) the termination of the
engagement of a financial advisor engaged to assist in advising the
Noteholders and (2) a prepayment by Intrepid of a principal amount
of $23 million of the notes under the Note Purchase Agreement,
together with accrued interest and a make-whole amount, in
connection with the closing of the NPA Amendment.  The $23 million
prepayment was made on June 30, 2017, using cash on hand.  As of
June 30, 2017, Intrepid had not made any sales of its common stock
under its previously announced at-the-market offering program.

The NPA Amendment also modifies the Note Purchase Agreement to,
among other things, (1) alter the methodology for determining the
variable interest rate for the Notes, though the interest rates
will continue to be adjusted quarterly based on Intrepid's
financial performance and certain financial covenant levels, (2)
require a mandatory prepayment of a principal amount of $6 million
of the Notes, together with accrued interest and a make-whole
amount, on or prior to Dec. 31, 2017, and a second mandatory
prepayment of a principal amount of $10 million of the Notes,
together with accrued interest and a make-whole amount, on or prior
to Dec. 31, 2018, and (3) modify certain terms regarding the
mandatory redemptions or offers of prepayment to the Noteholders.

Intrepid originally issued $150 million principal amount of the
Notes in 2013.  During the fourth quarter of 2016 and the first
quarter of 2017, Intrepid repaid $61 million principal amount of
the Notes, leaving a balance of $89 million as of March 31, 2017.
After the $23 million prepayment, Intrepid had $66 million
principal amount of the Notes outstanding as of June 30, 2017.
After Intrepid makes the additional mandatory prepayments of $6
million and $10 million principal amount of the Notes on or prior
to Dec. 31, 2017, and Dec. 31, 2018, respectively, the outstanding
balance of the Notes will be $50 million.

                  Amendment to Credit Agreement

On June 30, 2017, Intrepid and certain of its subsidiaries entered
into a First Amendment to Credit Agreement with Bank of Montreal,
as administrative agent, and certain other lenders.  The Credit
Agreement Amendment amends the Credit Agreement, dated as of
Oct. 30, 2016, by and among Intrepid, BMO, and the other lenders.

The Credit Agreement Amendment modifies the Credit Agreement to,
among other things, (1) extend the maturity date under the Credit
Agreement to Oct. 31, 2019, (2) allow for the prepayments of the
Notes contemplated by the NPA Amendment and the Note Purchase
Agreement, as amended by the NPA Amendment, and (3) permit up to
$10 million of borrowings under the Credit Agreement to be used by
Intrepid to make payments on the Notes.

                    About Intrepid Potash

Intrepid Potash -- http://www.intrepidpotash.com/-- is the only
U.S. producer of muriate of potash and supplied approximately 9% of
the country's annual consumption in 2015.  Potash is applied as an
essential nutrient for healthy crop development, utilized in
several industrial applications and used as an ingredient in animal
feed.  Intrepid also produces a specialty fertilizer, Trio(R),
which delivers three key nutrients, potassium, magnesium, and
sulfate, in a single particle.

Intrepid serves diverse customers in markets where a logistical
advantage exists; and is a leader in the utilization of solar
evaporation production, one of the lowest cost, environmentally
friendly production methods for potash.  After the idling of its
West mine in July 2016, Intrepid's production will come from three
solar solution potash facilities and one conventional underground
Trio(R) mine.

Intrepid reported a net loss of $66.63 million on $210.9 million of
sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of
$524.8 million on $287.2 million of sales for the year ended Dec.
31, 2015.  

As of March 31, 2017, Intrepid had $539.1 million in total assets,
$131.0 million in total liabilities and $408.0 million in total
stockholders' equity.

"Our operations have primarily been funded from cash on hand and
cash generated by operations.  We will continue to monitor our
future sources and uses of cash, and anticipate that we will make
adjustments to our capital allocation strategies when, and if,
determined by our Board of Directors.  We expect to continue to
look for opportunities to improve our capital structure by reducing
debt and its related interest expense.  We may, at any time we deem
conditions favorable, also attempt to improve our liquidity
position by accessing debt or equity markets in accordance with our
existing debt agreements.  We cannot provide any assurance that we
will pursue any of these transactions or that we will be successful
in completing them on acceptable terms or at all.  We believe that
we have sufficient liquidity for the next twelve months," the
Company stated in its quarterly report for the period ended March
31, 2017.


JACK COOPER: Exchange Offer Will Result in $429.2M Debt Retirement
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Cooper Enterprises, Inc., and Jack Cooper Holdings Corp.
announced that its previously reported exchange transactions will
result in the retirement of $429.2 million of the Company's
outstanding debt, including of $373.9 million of JCHC's 9.25%
Senior Secured Notes due 2020 and $55.3 million of JCEI's
10.50%/11.25% Senior PIK Toggle Notes due 2019.  In total, the
Existing Notes tendered represent 98.97% of all Existing Notes
eligible to participate in the Exchange Transactions.

Michael Riggs, the Company's CEO, commented: "We are pleased to
announce the results of the Exchange Transactions for the Existing
Notes.  The Exchange Transactions, coupled with the 2016 exchange
transactions, will reduce the Company's outstanding debt by over
$300 million.  In addition, the Exchange Transactions will decrease
the Company's annual interest expense by over $9.8 million, and the
financing for the Exchange Transactions will effectively extend the
maturity date of our old bond debt by an additional three years
until 2023.  This deleveraging event is a critical milestone in the
Company's efforts to create a healthy and sustainable balance sheet
for all of our constituencies -- including our lenders and
investors, employees, unions, owners, and most importantly, our
customers."

The Company intends to fund the cash portions of the Exchange
Transactions with the proceeds from an issuance $227.5 million of a
new series of 13.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2023.

The Exchange Transactions included (i) an offer to exchange any and
all of the JCHC Notes for (a) cash and (b) warrants issued by JCEI
exercisable for shares of Class B common stock of JCEI and a
related solicitation of consents to amend the JCHC Notes and
related indenture, release the collateral securing the JCHC Notes
and consent to a general release and waiver of claims and (ii) an
offer to purchase any and all of the outstanding JCEI Notes for
cash and a related solicitation of consents to amend the JCEI Notes
and related indenture and to a general release and waiver of
claims.

In connection with the Consent Solicitations, JCHC, the JCHC Notes
guarantors and the JCHC Notes trustee will enter into a
supplemental indenture to the indenture governing the Existing JCHC
Notes giving effect to the JCHC Notes Proposed Amendments and
Collateral Release (as defined and the Offering Memorandum and
Disclosure Statement), and JCEI and the JCEI Notes trustee will
enter into a supplemental indenture to the indenture governing the
Existing JCEI Notes giving effect to the JCEI Notes Proposed
Amendments (as defined and the Offering Memorandum and Disclosure
Statement).

As of the Expiration Time of the Offers (which was extended to 5:00
p.m., New York City time, on June 29, 2017), $373,901,000 aggregate
principal amount of JCHC Notes (or 99.71%)  had been validly
tendered and not withdrawn in the Exchange Offer and $55,292,876
aggregate principal amount of JCEI Notes (or 94.29%) had been
validly tendered and not withdrawn in the Tender Offer. The
Company, the original signatories to the JCHC Support Agreement (as
defined in the Offering Memorandum and Disclosure Statement) and
Solus (as defined in the Offering Memorandum and Disclosure
Statement) waived the 97% Minimum Condition for the JCEI Notes in
light of the fact that 98.97% of all Existing Notes eligible
participated in the Exchange Transactions.  The final settlement of
the Offers, the issuance of the New Secured Notes and the execution
of the supplemental indentures were expected to occur on June 30,
2017.

With the successful completion of the Exchange Transactions, the
Company's primary focus will continue to be customer service and
operational efficiencies.

                        About Jack Cooper

Jack Cooper Holdings Corp. is a specialty transportation and other
logistics provider and the largest over-the-road finished vehicle
logistics company in North America.  The Company provides premium
asset-heavy and asset-light based solutions to the global new and
previously owned vehicle markets, specializing in finished vehicle
transportation and other logistics services for major automotive
original equipment manufacturers and for fleet ownership companies,
remarketers, dealers and auctions.  The Company is a certified
Woman-Owned Business Enterprise by the Woman's Business Enterprise
Council.  The Company does not expect the consummation of the
Amended Offers to impact its certification by the WBENC.

Jack Cooper reported a net loss of $33.27 million on $667.8 million
of operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to
a net loss of $69.91 million on $728.6 million of operating
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  

As of March 31, 2017, Jack Cooper had $284.8 million in total
assets, $642.2 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $357.4 million.


JACOBS FINANCIAL: Incurs $1.3 Million Net Loss in Fiscal 2016
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jacobs Financial Group, Inc., simultaneously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission its annual reports for the
fiscal years ended May 31, 2014, May 31, 2015, and May 31, 2016.

Jacobs Financial reported a net loss attributable to stockholders
of $1.27 million on $1.33 million of total revenues for the year
ended May 31, 2016, a net loss attributable to stockholders of
$2.74 million on $1.57 million of total revenues for the year ended
May 31, 2015, and a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$2.91 million on $1.26 million of total revenues for the year ended
May 31, 2014.

As of May 31, 2016, Jacobs Financial had $11.87 million in total
assets, $23.21 million in total liabilities, $2.15 million in total
mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock and a total
stockholders' deficit of $13.49 million.

EKS&H LLLP, in Denver, Colorado, issued "going concern"
qualifications on the consolidated financial statements stating
that the Company has insufficient liquidity and capitalization, and
has suffered recurring operating losses.  These conditions, among
others, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

Full-text copies of the Forms 10-K are available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/6UkvaK
                     https://is.gd/zhPsrB
                     https://is.gd/alsfyQ

                    About Jacobs Financial

Jacobs Financial Group, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: JFGI) is a
Charleston, West Virginia-based holding company for First Surety
Corporation, a West Virginia domiciled surety, Triangle Surety
Agency, an insurance agency that specializes in coal reclamation
surety bonds, and Jacobs & Company, a registered investment
advisor.


JUPITER RESOURCES: S&P Revises Outlook to Stable & Affirms B CCR
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it revised its outlook on Calgary,
Alta.-based Jupiter Resources Inc. to stable from negative. At the
same time, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' long-term corporate
credit rating on the company. In addition, S&P Global Ratings
affirmed its 'B-' issue-level rating on the company's senior
unsecured notes. The recovery rating on the notes is unchanged at
'5', indicating S&P's expectation for modest (10% to 30%; rounded
estimate 25%) recovery in the event of default.

S&P Global Ratings has also revised its liquidity assessment on
Jupiter to adequate from strong, based on its expectation of higher
capital spending, which will move its estimated ratio of liquidity
sources to uses into the 1.2x-1.5x range.

S&P said, "The outlook revision reflects our expectation of
improved projected revenue and cash flow for Jupiter. Based on our
forecast cash flow generation, we estimate the company's fully
adjusted, weighted-average funds from operations (FFO)-to-debt
ratio will improve compared with our previous expectations, being
stable at about 10% under our base-case scenario. At the same time,
we expect Jupiter will maintain an adequate liquidity profile while
it increases its capital spending to achieve significant production
growth through 2018.

"The company's weak business risk profile reflects our opinion of
Jupiter's relatively small scale compared to larger peers as well
as its limited geographic diversity. We believe its moderately
sized reserve base of 1.33 trillion cubic feet equivalent of net
proved reserves (about 70% gas; 40% proved developed) is stronger
than that of some of similarly rated exploration and production
(E&P) companies. Nevertheless, the assets' geographic concentration
could expose the company to unexpected infrastructure constraints
or weather conditions to a significant part of its portfolio.

"Although Jupiter's cash flow is exposed to the highly volatile and
capital-intensive oil and gas E&P industry, we believe the
company's effective hedging program has helped it to generate
profitability measures that are better than most of its peers,
especially during the weak commodity price environment seen over
the past year.

"We assess Jupiter's financial risk profile as highly leveraged,
based on the credit metrics profile in our base-case scenario
forecasts, the company's outspending cash flow, and our view of the
financial policies associated with Jupiter's financial sponsor
ownership. We expect the company to outspend cash flow through
2018, leading to weighted-average, two-year (2017-2018)
debt-to-EBITDA and FFO-to-debt of 5.5x-6.0x and about 10%,
respectively. Jupiter's hedging strategy helps it to stabilize cash
flows and support credit measures during periods of weak natural
gas prices, as happened in 2016, and we expect its hedging program
to continue supporting 2017 operating results.

The weak business risk profile and highly leveraged financial risk
profile indicate a split anchor score of 'b/b-'. S&P has selected
the 'b' anchor score to reflect that the credit measures are at the
stronger end of the highly leveraged indicative ratios range. The
strength of Jupiter's competitive position compared with that of
similarly rated peers and the company's hedging strategy, which
supported profitability through the weak commodity price cycle,
also support the 'b' anchor.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Jupiter's
FFO-to-debt will be relatively stable, at about 10% through 2018;
and its adequate liquidity profile will continue, as the company
continues to outspend internally generated cash flows to increase
production.

S&P would consider a negative rating action if Jupiter does not
achieve its base-case forecast production growth, which would
weaken its prospective cash flow metrics. Specifically, S&P would
lower the rating if the company's FFO-to-debt weakens from S&P's
current estimate, and moves to or below 6%, without any clear path
for improvement due to reduced production forecasts or weak
operating efficiency while liquidity deteriorates.

"Given its ownership structure, which we do not expect will change
during our 12-month outlook period, an upgrade would only occur if
Jupiter is able to materially broaden its operational and
geographic diversification, and reduce its already competitive
full-cycle cost structure. These changes would likely only occur in
the long term, so we believe an upgrade is unlikely for several
years," S&P said.


KATY INDUSTRIES: Seeks Retirees Committee Appointment
-----------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Katy Industries filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court an expedited motion for an order authorizing
the U.S. Trustee to appoint an official committee of retired
employees to serve as the official representative for the Debtors'
retired employees.  The motion explains, "There are currently 58
participants in the Retiree Medical Program, of which 48 are the
Retirees and 10 are their dependents. Although the estimated total
monthly amount associated with the Retiree Medical Program is
relatively small under usual circumstances -- approximately $17,000
for claims and $2,900 for medical administrative service fees
payable to UMR, a division of United Healthcare -- the Debtors are
exposed to potentially high claims at any given time due to being
self-insured. There are approximately 23 retirees for whom the
Debtors pay life insurance premiums. Currently, the estimated
monthly amount associated with such liability is $2,100. Although
the total net monthly cost to the Debtors for the Retiree Welfare
Programs is approximately $15,000, the Debtors remain vulnerable
and exposed to potentially high claims under the self-insured plan.
Given the procedural posture of these chapter 11 cases, the
impending sale of substantially all of the Debtors' assets and the
liability exposure discussed above, the Debtors have determined
that it is necessary to, in an abundance of caution, begin the
process to terminate the Retiree Welfare Programs." The Court
scheduled a July 6, 2017 hearing to consider the retiree committee
motion.

                      About Kay Industries

Katy Industries, Inc. -- http://www.katyindustries.com/-- a      
publicly traded Delaware corporation, is a manufacturer, importer,
and distributor of commercial cleaning and consumer storage
products as well as a contract manufacturer of structural foam
products.  It distributes its products across  the United States
and Canada.  It is best known for such brands as Continental,
Huskee, Color Guard, Wilen, Muscle Mop, Contico, Tuffbin, and
SilverWolf, among many others.  The Company operates three
manufacturing facilities located in Jefferson City, Missouri,
Tiffin, Ohio, and Fort Wayne, Indiana, with its corporate
headquarters located in St. Louis, Missouri.   

Katy Industries, Inc., and its affiliates filed voluntary
petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 17-11101) on May 14, 2017.  Katy Industries disclosed assets at
$821,321 and liabilities at $58,421,346.

The petitions were signed by Lawrence R. Perkins of
SierraConstellation Partners LLC, who serves as the Debtors' chief
restructuring officer.

The Debtors tapped Stuart M. Brown, Esq., at DLA Piper LLP (US) as
counsel; and Lincoln Partners Advisors LLC as their investment
banker.


KERENSA INVESTMENT: Case Converted to Chapter 7
-----------------------------------------------
The Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada converted the Chapter 11 case of Kerensa
Investment Fund 1, LLC to one under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Shelley D. Krohn, as Chapter 11 Trustee for Kerensa Investment Fund
1, filed the request.  No objections were filed.

                 About Kerensa Investment Fund

Kerensa Investment Fund, LLC filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Nev. Case No. 11-24352) on September 9, 2011, and was represented
by Matthew L. Johnson, Esq., in Las Vegas, Nevada.

At the time of filing, Kerensa had $1,000,001 to $10,000,000 in
estimated assets and $100,001 to $500,000 in estimated debts.

The petition was signed by Bruce N. Rosenthal, managing member.

Submarina, Inc., is a food franchisor. It sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No.
12-22097) on Oct. 25, 2012.  The petition also was signed by Bruce
N. Rosenthal, president and CEO.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor estimated its assets and debts at $1,000,001 to
$10,000,000.

The cases were jointly administered under Submarina Inc.'s case.


LAURITSEN FIREWOOD: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------------
An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Lauritsen Firewood & Rental
Inc. as of July 3, according to a court docket.

Lauritsen is represented by:

     Joshua D. Christianson, Esq.
     Freund Law Office
     20 South Farwell St.
     P.O. Box 222
     Eau Claire, WI 54702-0222
     Tel: 715-832-5151
     Fax: 888-979-8101
     Email: freundlaw@fastmail.fm

               About Lauritsen Firewood & Rental

Lauritsen Firewood & Rental Inc. is a firewood delivery company.
Based in Cushing, Wisconsin, it provides wood heating, firewood
chopping, and flat roofing.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Wis. Case No. 17-11785) on May 17, 2017.  Derek
Lauritsen, president, signed the petition.  

Judge Catherine J. Furay presides over the case.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $6.67 million in
assets and $3.47 million in liabilities.


LSB INDUSTRIES: Jack Golsen Will Retire as Executive Chairman
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jack E. Golsen, LSB Industries, Inc.'s executive chairman of the
Board of Directors, has informed the Board of his election to
retire as executive chairman effective Dec. 31, 2017, and,
therefore, the Company has determined not to extend its employment
agreement with Mr. Golsen beyond its current term expiring on Dec.
31, 2017, and, in accordance with the terms of the Employment
Agreement, delivered a notice of non-renewal to Mr. Golsen.  Mr.
Golsen will remain a member of the Board and, following the
Retirement Date, will have the title of Chairman Emeritus.

The Company and Mr. Golsen entered into a transition agreement on
June 30, 2017, that will commence on Jan. 1, 2018, and end upon the
earlier of his death or a change in control as defined in the
Transition Agreement.  During the Term, Mr. Golsen will receive an
annual cash retainer of $480,000 and an additional monthly amount
equal to $4,400 to cover certain expenses.  In accordance with the
terms of the Transition Agreement, the Company will also reimburse
Mr. Golsen for his COBRA premium costs for 18 months following the
Retirement Date and, thereafter, will reimburse him for the cost of
coverage under Medicare Part B and D medical insurance until his
death.  Effective as of the Retirement Date, the existing severance
agreement between Mr. Golsen and the Company will terminate.  In
consideration for his services to the Company, including as
Chairman Emeritus, the Company will pay Mr. Golsen a one-time
payment equal to $2.32 million upon the consummation of a change in
control that occurs prior to his death.

                      About LSB Industries

Oklahoma City-based LSB Industries, Inc. (NYSE:LXU) and its
subsidiaries are involved in manufacturing and marketing
operations.  LSB is primarily engaged in the manufacture and sale
of chemical products and the manufacture and sale of water source
and geothermal heat pumps and air handling products.

LSB reported net income attributable to common stockholders of
$64.76 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to
a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $38.03 million in
2015.  

As of March 31, 2017, LSB Industries had $1.26 billion in total
assets, $630.77 million in total liabilities, $152.16 million in
redeemable preferred stocks and $481.55 million in total
stockholders' equity.

"We believe that the combination of our cash on hand, the
availability on our revolving credit facility ... under "Loan
Agreements and Redeemable Preferred Stock," and our cash from
operations will be sufficient to fund our anticipated liquidity
needs for the next twelve months.  In addition... we are in the
process of selling certain non-core assets for a total of
approximately $15 million to $20 million of net cash proceeds (net
of any debt outstanding against these assets)," the Company said in
its quarterly report for the quarter ended March 31, 2017.

                           *    *    *

In October 2016, S&P Global Ratings lowered its rating on LSB
Industries to 'CCC' from 'B-'.  "Despite using the climate control
business sale proceeds to repay some debt, the company's metrics
have weakened due to plant operational issues and a depressed
pricing environment, which have led to depressed EBITDA
expectations," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Allison
Schroeder.

In November 2016, Moody's Investors Service downgraded LSB's
corporate family rating (CFR) to 'Caa1' from 'B3', its probability
of default rating to 'Caa1-PD' from 'B3-PD', and the $375 million
guaranteed senior secured notes to 'Caa1' from 'B3'.  LSB's Caa1
CFR rating reflects Moody's expectations that the combined
uncertainty over operational reliability and the compressed
margins, resulting from the low nitrogen fertilizer pricing
environment, could result in continued weak financial metrics for
a protracted period.


LUCKY # 5409: Hires Schmidt Salzman & Moran as Special Tax Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Lucky # 5409, Inc., et al., seek permission from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois to employ
Schmidt Salzman & Moran, Ltd., as special tax counsel for the
Debtors in Possession.

The Debtors require Schmidt Salzman to:

     a. review the Debtors' assets, financial statements, and other
information for the purpose of analyzing whether the Debtors are
entitled to any property tax savings under applicable law;

     b. represent the Debtors in any proceedings before the
Assessor of Cook County, Board of Review, Property Tax Appeal
Board, and/or the Circuit Court of Cook County; and

     c. perform any other tax-related services the Debtors require
on an as-needed basis.

The Debtors request Schmidt Salzman to be compensated on a
contingency basis as follows:

      i. In the event Schmidt Salzman is successful in obtaining
any tax refund through a Certificate of Error Proceeding,
proceedings before the Illinois Property Tax Appeal Board, or the
Circuit Court of Cook County, Schmidt Salzman shall be entitled to
a contingency fee equal to 33% of the tax savings or amount
refunded; and

      ii. Schmidt Salzman shall be entitled to a contingency fee
equal to 8% of any other tax savings obtained for the Debtors'
estates.

Schmidt Salzman will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Theodore J. Schmidt, Esq., partner of the law firm of Schmidt
Salzman & Moran, Ltd., assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtors and their estates.

Schmidt Salzman can be reached at:

     Theodore J. Schmidt, Esq.
     Schmidt Salzman & Moran, Ltd.
     111 West Washington Street, Suite 1300
     Chicago, IL 60602
     Tel: (312) 263.7100
     Fax: (312) 263.7108
     E-mail: tschmidt@ssmtax.com

                    About Lucky # 5409

Azhar Chaudhry is an individual and franchisee of an International
House of Pancakes restaurant located at 7240 W. 79th Street,
Bridgeview, Illinois 60455 (IHOP-Bridgeview). IHOP-Bridgeview is
operated through the corporate entity, Lucky # 5409, Inc.  Chaudhry
is the sole shareholder and president of Lucky.  IHOP Bridgeview's
day-to-day operations are run by the restaurant's manager, Ron
Matin.

Lucky # 5409, Inc., and Azhar Chaudhry sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.
16-16264 and 16-16273) on May 13, 2016.  The cases are jointly
administered under Case No. 16-16264.  The petitions were signed by
Azhar M. Chaudhry, president.  The Debtors estimated assets at
$500,001 to $1 million and liabilities at $100,001 to $500,000 at
the time of the filing.

The Debtors are represented by Kevin H. Morse, Esq., at Arnstein &
Lehr LLP.  The Debtor hired Tax Consulting Inc. as accountant.


M.B. UNLIMITED: Seeks October 8 Exclusive Plan Filing Extension
---------------------------------------------------------------
M.B. Unlimited, Inc. requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Louisiana to extend the time in which to file a
Plan of Reorganization and gain acceptance of its Plan for a period
of 60 days or until October 8, 2017 and December 7, 2017,
respectively.

Upon filing its bankruptcy petition, the Court issued a 120-day
order setting the Plan filing date as August 9, 2017, and the
acceptance deadline 60 days thereafter.  Consequently, the Debtor
was ordered to file a Plan of Reorganization on July 5, 2017,
pursuant to a Court Order dated June 12, 2017.

Although the Debtor intends to file a Plan on or before July 5,
2017, the Debtor seeks an extension in an abundance of caution so
as to avoid confusion of the deadlines affording the Debtor
exclusivity.

                About M.B. Unlimited, Inc.

M.B. Unlimited, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 17-10903) on April 11, 2017, disclosing
under $50,000 in assets and $50,000 to $100,000 in estimated
liabilities. The petition was signed by Tanya Boudreaux,
secretary/treasurer.

The Debtor is represented by Richard W. Martinez, Esq., at Richard
W. Martinez, APLC. The Debtor hires Mitchell C. Compeaux, CPAs as
accountant.

No trustee or examiner or unsecured creditors' committee has been
sought or approved.


MACDONALD DETTWILER: S&P Assigns 'BB' CCR & Rates New Debt 'BB'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' corporate credit rating to
MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. (MDA). The outlook is
stable.

MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. (MDA) plans to acquire
DigitalGlobe Inc. (DGI) for C$4.4 billion, including DGI's debt,
using a combination of new bank debt and MDA stock to finance
the transaction.  S&P said the acquisition will modestly improve
MDA's scale and scope of operations, as well as its exposure to the
U.S. government, but it will also result in debt to EBITDA
increasing to 4.5x in 2017 on a pro forma basis from 3.6x in 2016.


SP said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'BB' issue-level and
'3' recovery ratings to the company's first-lien credit facilities,
which include a $1.15 billion revolver due in 2021, $100 million
operating facility due in 2021, $250 million term loan A1 due in
2020, $250 million term loan A2 due in 2021, and $2 billion term
loan B due in 2024. The '3' recovery rating indicates our
expectation for meaningful recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate:
50%) in a default scenario."

"Our rating on MDA reflects the company's increased debt but
modestly improved scale and product diversity, as well as increased
exposure to revenues from the U.S. government that will result from
the acquisition of DGI. It also reflects the combined company's
leading positions in niche communications-satellites and
satellite-imagery markets, above-average margins, limited cash flow
in the next few years due to high capex requirements at DGI,
somewhat high program concentration, participation in the cyclical
and currently weak communications-satellite market, and integration
risks."

"The stable outlook reflects our expectations that, although
leverage will increase as a result of the proposed acquisition,
credit ratios should improve over the next 12-24 months due to debt
reduction and growing earnings. However, the pace of improvement
will initially be modest as high capex will limit cash available
for debt reduction. We expect debt to EBITDA of 4x-4.5x in 2018."

"We could lower the rating if debt to EBITDA stays above 4.5x by
the end of 2018 as a result of unforeseen integration problems,
lower debt reduction than we expect, a delayed recovery in the
communications-satellite market, or lower earnings due to contract
losses or poor contract performance."

"Although unlikely in the next 12 months as the company integrates
the DGI business, we could raise the rating if debt to EBITDA
declines below 4x. This could occur if the satellite market
recovers faster than expected or if the company delays planned
capex and dedicates more cash flow to debt reduction."


MARIMED INC: Obtains $5.15 Million from Private Placement
---------------------------------------------------------
Between Feb. 28, 2017, and June 1, 2017, Marimed Inc. raised
$5,150,000 through the sale of 22,178,889 shares.  The sales were
made by the Company's officers in an exempt private placement to
accredited investors, without any advertising and without the
payment of any commissions, pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D as
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.

                         About MariMed

Based in Brookline, Mass., MariMed Inc., formerly known as
Worlds Online Inc., currently operates in two separate segments
with one segment being a 3D entertainment portal which leverages
its proprietary licensed technology to offer visitors a network of
virtual, multi-user environments which the Company calls "worlds"
and the second segment, MariMed Advisors, being a management
company in the medical cannabis industry.

Worlds Online reported net income of $321,165 on $3.564 million of
total revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared with a net
loss of $1.84 million on $1.270 million of total revenue for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  

As of March 31, 2017, MariMed had $10.84 million in total assets,
$9.95 million in total liabilities and $890,554 in total
stockholders' equity.

L&L CPAS, PA issued a "going concern" qualification on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.
The auditors noted the Company has suffered recurring operating
losses, has an accumulated stockholders' deficit, has negative
working capital, has had minimal revenues from operations, and has
yet to generate an internal cash flow that raises substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.


MARINA BIOTECH: Appoint Vuong Trieu Ph.D. as Executive Chairman
---------------------------------------------------------------
Marina Biotech, Inc., appointed Vuong Trieu, Ph.D. to serve as
executive chairman of the Company, effective June 30, 2017.  In
that capacity, Dr. Trieu will have the authority to act in a
management capacity on behalf of the Company.  Dr. Trieu is not
entering into, or amending, any compensatory arrangement with the
Company in connection with his appointment as executive director.

Dr. Trieu has served as a director of the Company, and as the
Chairman of its Board of Directors, since November 2016.  Dr. Trieu
currently serves as the Chairman of the Board and the chief
executive officer at Autotelic Inc. (since May 2014), as the
Chairman of the Board and the Chief Regulatory Officer at each of
Glucotelic Inc. (since November 2016), Osteotelic Inc. (since July
2016), Oncotelic Inc. (since October 2015) and Stocosil (since
February 2015), and as the Chairman of the Board and the Chief
Operating Officer at LipoMedics Inc. (since August 2015).  He
previously served as Chairman of the Board and president of
IThenaPharma Inc. from August 2014 until that entity's merger with
Marina Biotech in November 2016, as the chief scientific officer of
Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. from September 2013 until May 2014, as
the president and chief executive officer at IgDraSol Inc. from
January 2012 until August 2013, as the president and chief
executive officer at Biomiga Diagnostics from 2011 until August
2013, and as the Director of Biology / Pharmacology at Abraxis
BioScience from November 2002 until July 2011.  He also served as a
member of the Board of Directors of Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.
from September 2013 until August 2014.  Dr. Trieu received a Ph.D.
in microbiology / molecular biology from the University of
Oklahoma.

Dr. Trieu was appointed to serve as a director pursuant to that
certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of Nov. 15, 2016, by
and among the Company, Ithena Acquisition Corporation, IthenaPharma
Inc. and Dr. Trieu as the representative of the stockholders of
IthenaPharma Inc.  Other than as a result of the Merger Agreement,
the transactions contemplated thereby and the agreements entered
into in connection therewith, there are no arrangements or
understandings between Dr. Trieu and any other persons pursuant to
which Dr. Trieu was selected as a director. There are also no
family relationships between Dr. Trieu and any director or
executive officer of the Company, other than that Falguni Trieu,
the director of Business Development, is the spouse of Dr. Trieu.

In addition, there are no transactions between the Company and Dr.
Trieu or his immediate family members requiring disclosure under
Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, other than that: (A) the Company
and Dr. Trieu are parties to a Line Letter pursuant to which Dr.
Trieu offered to the Company an unsecured line of credit in an
amount not to exceed $540,000, to be used for current operating
expenses; (B) Dr. Trieu is the chief executive officer of Autotelic
LLC, with which entity the Company entered into a License Agreement
dated Nov. 15, 2016; (C) Dr. Trieu is the Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Autotelic Inc., with which entity the Company entered
into a Master Services Agreement dated Nov. 15, 2016, and which
entity offered to the Company an unsecured line of credit in an
amount not to exceed $500,000 in April 2017; and (D) Dr. Trieu is
the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Operating Officer
of LipoMedics Inc., with which entity the Company entered into a
License Agreement and a Stock Purchase Agreement, each dated Feb.
6, 2017.  Immediately following the completion of the Merger,
Autotelic LLC owned approximately 25.8% of the issued and
outstanding shares of the common stock of the Company and Autotelic
Inc. owned approximately 5.9% of the issued and outstanding shares
of the common stock of the Company.

                      About Marina Biotech

Marina Biotech, Inc., headquartered in Bothell, Washington, is a
biotechnology company focused on the discovery, development and
commercialization of nucleic acid-based therapies utilizing gene
silencing approaches such as RNA interference ("RNAi") and
blocking messenger RNA ("mRNA") translation.  The Company's goal
is to improve human health through the development, either through
its own efforts or those of its collaboration partners and
licensees, of these nucleic acid-based therapeutics as well as the
delivery technologies that together provide superior treatment
options for patients.  The Company has multiple proprietary
technologies integrated into a broad nucleic acid-based drug
discovery platform, with the capability to deliver novel nucleic
acid-based therapeutics via systemic, local and oral
administration to target a wide range of human diseases, based on
the unique characteristics of the cells and organs involved in
each disease.

On June 1, 2012, the Company announced that, due to its financial
condition, it had implemented a furlough of approximately 90% of
its employees and ceased substantially all day-to-day operations.
Since that time substantially all of the furloughed employees have
been terminated.  As of Sept. 30, 2012, the Company had
approximately 11 remaining employees, including all of its
executive officers, all of whom are either furloughed or working
on reduced salary.  As a result, since June 1, 2012, its internal
research and development efforts have been minimal, pending
receipt of adequate funding.

Marina Biotech reported a net loss of $837,143 on $0 of revenue for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared with a net loss of $1.11
million on $0 of revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  

As of March 31, 2017, Marina had $6.11 million in total assets,
$2.69 million in total liabilities, all current, and $3.41 million
in total stockholders' equity.

Squar Milner LLP, in Los Angeles, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations and has
had recurring negative working capital.  This raises substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


MARINA BIOTECH: Issues $220,000 Convertible Notes
-------------------------------------------------
During the period following June 5, 2017, Marina Biotech, Inc.
issued convertible promissory notes of the Company in the aggregate
principal amount of $220,000 to accredited investors. The Notes
were issued as part of the offering being conducted pursuant to
that certain Note Purchase Agreement that the Company originally
entered into with certain accredited investors on
June 5, 2017.  The Notes bear interest at a rate of five percent
per annum and are due and payable at any time on or after the
earlier of (i) June 1, 2018, and (ii) the occurrence of an event of
default (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement).  As a result
of the sale of the Notes, the aggregate principal amount of the
Notes that the Company has issued pursuant to the Note Purchase
Agreement is $400,000.

Upon written notice delivered to the Company by the holders of a
majority in interest of the aggregate principal amount of Notes
that are outstanding at the time of such calculation not more than
five days following the maturity date of the Notes, the Majority
Holders will have the right, but not the obligation, on behalf of
themselves and all other holders of Notes, to elect to convert the
entire unpaid principal amount of all, but not less than all, of
the Notes and the accrued and unpaid interest thereon into such
number of shares of the common stock of the Company as is equal to,
with respect to each Note: (x) the entire unpaid principal amount
of such Note and the accrued and unpaid interest thereon on the
date of the delivery of such election notice by (y) $0.35.

The Company issued the Notes in reliance on the exemption from
registration afforded by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated
thereunder, as a transaction not involving any public offering.

                      About Marina Biotech

Marina Biotech, Inc., headquartered in Bothell, Washington, is a
biotechnology company focused on the discovery, development and
commercialization of nucleic acid-based therapies utilizing gene
silencing approaches such as RNA interference ("RNAi") and
blocking messenger RNA ("mRNA") translation.  The Company's goal
is to improve human health through the development, either through
its own efforts or those of its collaboration partners and
licensees, of these nucleic acid-based therapeutics as well as the
delivery technologies that together provide superior treatment
options for patients.  The Company has multiple proprietary
technologies integrated into a broad nucleic acid-based drug
discovery platform, with the capability to deliver novel nucleic
acid-based therapeutics via systemic, local and oral
administration to target a wide range of human diseases, based on
the unique characteristics of the cells and organs involved in
each disease.

On June 1, 2012, the Company announced that, due to its financial
condition, it had implemented a furlough of approximately 90% of
its employees and ceased substantially all day-to-day operations.
Since that time substantially all of the furloughed employees have
been terminated.  As of Sept. 30, 2012, the Company had
approximately 11 remaining employees, including all of its
executive officers, all of whom are either furloughed or working
on reduced salary.  As a result, since June 1, 2012, its internal
research and development efforts have been minimal, pending
receipt of adequate funding.

Marina Biotech reported a net loss of $837,143 on $0 of revenue for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared with a net loss of $1.11
million on $0 of revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of
March 31, 2017, Marina had $6.11 million in total assets, $2.69
million in total liabilities, all current, and $3.41 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Squar Milner LLP, in Los Angeles, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations and has
had recurring negative working capital.  This raises substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


MARSH SUPERMARKETS: Creditors' Panel Hires Bayard as Co-Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Marsh Supermarkets
Holdings, LLC, et al., seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to retain Bayard, PA as
co-counsel for the Committee, nunc pro tunc to May 18, 2017.

The Committee requires Bayard to:

      a. in conjunction with Cooley, provide legal advice where
necessary with respect to the Committee's powers and duties and
strategic advice on how to accomplish the Committee's goals,
bearing in mind that the Court relies on Delaware counsel such as
Bayard to be involved in all aspects of the bankruptcy
proceedings;

      b. draft, review and comment on drafts of documents to ensure
compliance with local rules, practices, and procedures;

      c. assist and advise the Committee in its consultation with
the Debtors and the U.S. Trustee relative to the administration of
these cases;

      d. draft, file, and serve documents as requested by Cooley
and the Committee;

      e. assist the Committee and Cooley, as necessary, in the
investigation (including through discovery) of the acts, conduct,
assets, liabilities and financial condition of the Debtors, the
operation of the Debtors' businesses, and any other matter relevant
to these cases or to the formulation of a plan or plans of
reorganization or liquidation;

      f. compile and coordinate delivery to the Court and the U.S.
Trustee information required by the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy
Rules, Local Rules, and any applicable U.S. Trustee guidelines
and/or requests;

      g. appear in Court and at any meetings of creditors on behalf
of the Committee in its capacity as Delaware counsel with Cooley;

      h. monitor the case docket and coordinating with Cooley and
FTI on matters impacting the Committee;

      i. participate in calls with the Committee;

      j. prepare, update and distribute critical dates memoranda
and working group lists;

      k. handle inquiries and calls from creditors and counsel to
interested parties regarding pending matters and the general status
of these cases and coordinating with Cooley on any necessary
responses; and

      l. provide additional support to Cooley, FTI, and the
Committee, as requested.

Bayard lawyers and paraprofessionals who will work on the Debtors'
cases and their hourly rates are:

                        Rate Prior to    Rate Effective
  Professional          June 1, 2017   as of June 1, 2017
  ------------          -------------  ------------------
Justin R. Alberto             $475          $500
Erin R. Fay                   $475          $475
Gregory J. Flasser            $305          $350
Larry Morton (paralegal)      $295          $295

As part of its ordinary business practice, Bayard reviews and
adjusts its rates yearly effective June 1. Therefore, the rates in
effect pre- and post- June 1 are being disclosed.

Bayard professionals hourly rates:

      Directors                    $475-$975
      Associates                   $305-$450
      Paraprofessionals            $240-$295

Bayard will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Justin R. Alberto, Esq., Director at Bayard, P.A., assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

The following is provided in response to the request for additional
information set forth in D1 of the U.S. Trustee's Appendix B
Guidelines:

     -- Bayard did not represent the Committee during the
prepetition period.

      -- The Committee has approved Bayard's prospective budget and
staffing for the period from May 18, 2017 through July 31, 2017.

By separate application, the Committee also seeks approval to
employ Cooley.

Bayard can be reached at:

      Justin R. Alberto, Esq.
      Bayard, P.A.
      222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Tel: (302) 655-5000
      Fax: (302) 658-6395
      Email: jalberto@bayardlaw.com

                     About Marsh Supermarkets

Founded in 1931, Marsh Supermarkets is a retail food chain
headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, with stores throughout
Central Indiana and parts of western Ohio.  A substantial majority
of the stores are operating under the Marsh Supermarkets banner,
and a handful of stores operate as O'Malia Food.  Marsh was
publicly traded until May 2006, when it was acquired by affiliates
of Sun Capital Partners IV, LP, and certain independent investors.

Marsh Supermarkets Holding, LLC, and 15 affiliated debtors each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
17-11066) on May 11, 2017.  As of the Petition Date, Marsh operated
60 stores in Indiana and Ohio, and had a workforce of approximately
4,400 employees.  The cases are pending before the Honorable
Brendan Linehan Shannon.

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, is serving as counsel to the
Debtors. Clear Thinking Group is the Debtors' restructuring
advisors.  Peter J. Solomon Company is the Debtors' investment
banker.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, on May 18, 2017,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee retained
Bayard, P.A., and Cooley LLP as counsel.


MARSH SUPERMARKETS: Creditors' Panel Hires Cooley as Lead Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Marsh Supermarkets
Holdings, LLC, et al., seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to retain Cooley LLP as lead
counsel for the Committee, nunc pro tunc to May 18, 2017.

The Committee requires Cooley to:

     a. attend the meetings of the Committee;

     b. review financial and operational information furnished by
the Debtors to the Committee;

     c. analyze and negotiate the budget and the terms of the
Debtors' use of cash collateral;

     d. assist in the Debtors' efforts to reorganize or sell their
assets in a manner that maximizes value for creditors;

     e. review and investigate the liens of purported secured
parties;

     f. review and investigate prepetition transactions in which
the Debtors and/or their insiders were involved;

     g. assist the Committee in negotiations with the Debtors and
other parties in interest on any proposed Chapter 11 plan or exit
strategy for these cases;

     h. confer with the Debtors' management, counsel and financial
advisor and any other retained professional;

     i. confer with the principals, counsel and advisors of the
Debtors' lenders and equity holders;

     j. review the Debtors' schedules, statements of financial
affairs and business plan;

     k. advise the Committee as to the ramifications regarding all
of the Debtors' activities and motions before this Court;

     l. file appropriate pleadings on behalf of the Committee;

     m. review and analyze the Debtors' financial advisors' work
product and report to the Committee;

     n. provide the Committee with legal advice in relation to the
chapter 11 cases;

     o. prepare various pleadings to be submitted to the Court for
consideration; and

     p. perform such other legal services for the Committee as may
be necessary or proper in these proceedings.

Cooley lawyers and paraprofessionals who will work on the Debtors'
cases and their hourly rates are:

     Cathy Hershcopf, Partner           $1,055
     Ian Shapiro, Partner                 $950
     Seth Van Aalten, Partner             $885
     Robert Winning, Associate            $835
     Sarah Carnes, Associate              $595
     Mollie Canby, Paralegal              $240

Cooley will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Seth Van Aalten, Esq., partner of the law firm of Cooley LLP,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

The following is provided in response to the request for additional
information set forth in D1 of the U.S. Trustee's Appendix B
Guidelines:

     -- Cooley did not represent the Committee in the 12 months
prepetition. Cooley has in the past represented, currently
represents, and may represent in the future certain Committee
members and/or their affiliates in their capacities as members of
official committees in other chapter 11 cases or in their
individual capacities.

      -- The Committee has approved Cooley's prospective budget and
staffing for the period from May 18, 2017 through July 31, 2017.

By separate application, the Committee is seeking to retain Bayard,
P.A. as its Delaware counsel, and FTI Consulting, Inc. as its
proposed financial advisor.

Cooley can be reached at:

      Seth Van Aalten, Esq.
      Cooley LLP
      the Grace Building
      1114 Avenue of the Americas
      New York, NY 10036-7798
      Tel: (212) 479-6104
      Fax: (212) 479-6275
      E-mail: svanaalten@cooley.com
  
                      About Marsh Supermarkets

Founded in 1931, Marsh Supermarkets is a retail food chain
headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, with stores throughout
Central Indiana and parts of western Ohio.  A substantial majority
of the stores are operating under the Marsh Supermarkets banner,
and a handful of stores operate as O'Malia Food.  Marsh was
publicly traded until May 2006, when it was acquired by affiliates
of Sun Capital Partners IV, LP, and certain independent investors.

Marsh Supermarkets Holding, LLC, and 15 affiliated debtors each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
17-11066) on May 11, 2017.  As of the Petition Date, Marsh operated
60 stores in Indiana and Ohio, and had a workforce of approximately
4,400 employees.  The cases are pending before the Honorable
Brendan Linehan Shannon.

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, is serving as counsel to the
Debtors. Clear Thinking Group is the Debtors' restructuring
advisors.  Peter J. Solomon Company is the Debtors' investment
banker.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, on May 18, 2017,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee retained
Bayard, P.A., and Cooley LLP as counsel.


MARSH SUPERMARKETS: Panel Hires FTI as Financial Advisor
--------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Marsh Supermarkets
Holdings, LLC, et al., seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to retain FTI Consulting, Inc.,
as financial advisor for the Committee, nunc pro tunc to May 19,
2017.

The Committee requires FTI to:

     a. assist in the review and monitoring of the asset sale
process, including, but not limited to an assessment of the
adequacy of the marketing process, completeness of any buyer lists,
review and quantifications of any bids and assistance at the sale
auction;

     b. assist in the preparation of analyses required to assess
the Debtors' proposed use of cash collateral;

     c. assist with the assessment and monitoring of the Debtors'
short term cash flow, liquidity, and operating results;

     d. assist in the review of other financial information
prepared by the Debtors, including, but not limited to, cash flow
projections and budgets, business plans, cash receipts and
disbursement analysis, asset and liability analysis, and the
economic analysis of proposed transactions for which Court approval
is sought;

     e. assist with the review of the Debtors' proposed key
employee incentive plan and other employee benefit programs;

     f. assist with the review of the Debtors' cost/benefit
analysis with respect to the affirmation or rejection of various
executory contracts and leases;

     g. assist in the review of financial related disclosures
required by the Court, including the Schedules of Assets and
Liabilities, the Statements of Financial Affairs and Monthly
Operating Reports;

     h. assist with review of any tax issues associated with, but
not limited to, claims/stock trading, preservation of net operating
losses, refunds due to the Debtors, plans of reorganization, and
asset sales;

     i. assist in the review of the claims reconciliation and
estimation process;

     j. attend at meetings and assist in discussions with the
Debtors, potential investors, banks, other secured lenders, the
Committee and any other official committees organized in these
chapter 11 proceedings, the U.S. Trustee, other parties in interest
and professionals hired by the same, as requested;

     k. assist in the review and/or preparation of information and
analysis necessary for the confirmation of a plan and related
disclosure statement in these chapter 11 proceedings;

     l. assist in the evaluation and analysis of avoidance actions,
including fraudulent conveyances and preferential transfers;

     m. assist in the prosecution of Committee responses/objections
to the Debtors' motions, including attendance at depositions and
provision of expert reports/testimony on case issues as required by
the Committee; and

     n. render other general business consulting or other
assistance as the Committee or its counsel may deem necessary that
are consistent with the role of a financial advisor and not
duplicative of services provided by other professionals in this
proceeding.

FTI will be paid at these hourly rates:

    Senior Managing Directors                       $840-$1,050
    Directors/Senior Directors/Managing Directors   $630-$835
    Consultants/Senior Consultants                  $335-$605
    Administrative/Paraprofessionals                $135-$265

FTI will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred.

Conor P. Tully, Senior Managing Director with FTI Consulting, Inc.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

FTI can be reached at:

     Conor P. Tully
     FTI Consulting, Inc.
     Three Times Square, 9th Floor
     New York, NY, 10036
     Tel: +1 212 247 1010
     Fax: +1 212 841 9350
     E-mail: conor.tully@fticonsulting.com

                  About Marsh Supermarkets

Founded in 1931, Marsh Supermarkets is a retail food chain
headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, with stores throughout
Central Indiana and parts of western Ohio.  A substantial majority
of the stores are operating under the Marsh Supermarkets banner,
and a handful of stores operate as O'Malia Food.  Marsh was
publicly traded until May 2006, when it was acquired by affiliates
of Sun Capital Partners IV, LP, and certain independent investors.

Marsh Supermarkets Holding, LLC, and 15 affiliated debtors each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
17-11066) on May 11, 2017.  As of the Petition Date, Marsh operated
60 stores in Indiana and Ohio, and had a workforce of approximately
4,400 employees.  The cases are pending before the Honorable
Brendan Linehan Shannon.

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, is serving as counsel to the
Debtors. Clear Thinking Group is the Debtors' restructuring
advisors.  Peter J. Solomon Company is the Debtors' investment
banker.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, on May 18, 2017,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee retained
Bayard, P.A., and Cooley LLP as counsel.


MED-X TRANS: Has $331,790 Tax Liability to IRS
----------------------------------------------
Judge Julie A. Manning of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut, Bridgeport Division, overruled Med-X
Trans, Inc.'s objection to the Internal Revenue Service's proof of
claim ("Claim No. 11") and determined the Debtor's tax liability to
the IRS to be $330,790.87.

On Aug. 28, 2014, the Debtor and Med-X Transportation, LLC ("Trans
LLC"), both filed Chapter 11 petitions in the Court.  On Nov. 6,
2015, both Chapter 11 cases were dismissed for failure to file or
confirm a plan within the 300-day deadline.  Following the
dismissal of the cases on Nov. 6, 2015, the Debtor then filed this
Chapter 11 case.

On Dec. 11, 2015, the IRS filed Claim 11-1 in the total amount of
$1,120,943.06, for pre-petition tax liabilities, penalties, and
interest.  The IRS Form 410 attached to Claim 11-1 set forth
Federal Insurance Contributions Act ("FICA"), and Federal
Unemployment Tax Act ("FUTA"), liabilities for the tax periods from
Dec. 31, 2009 through Dec. 31, 2014.  The tax liabilities set forth
in Claim 11-1 were owed by the entities with federal tax
identification numbers ending in 0211 (Trans LLC), 2340 (the
Debtor), and 1380 (Med-X Enterprises, Inc. ("Enterprise")).

On March 28, 2016, the IRS amended Claim 11-1 by filing Claim 11-2
in the amount of $330,790.87.  The IRS Form 410 attached to Claim
11-2 set forth FICA and FUTA liabilities for the tax periods from
Dec. 31, 2012 through Dec. 31, 2014, for taxes owed only by the
Debtor, the entity with a federal tax identification number ending
in 2340.

On May 11, 2016, the IRS amended Claim 11-2 by filing Claim 11-3 in
the amount of $634,964.33.  The IRS Form 410 attached to Claim 11-3
set forth FICA and FUTA liabilities for the tax periods from Dec.
31, 2012 through Dec. 31, 2014, for taxes owed by the Debtor (the
entity with a federal tax identification number ending in 2340) and
Enterprise (the entity with a federal tax identification number
ending in 1380).

On July 8, 2016, the Debtor filed an objection to Claim No. 11 and
motion for determination of tax liability pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
Section 505 ("Objection to Claim").  The Debtor asserts, among
other things, that during the time periods set forth in the IRS
Proof of Claim, the Debtor made payments of approximately
$769,980.66, which payments have never been properly credited or
applied to the Debtor's true tax obligations; and that the IRS
claims that certain payments made by the Debtor on account of its
tax liabilities were returned for non-sufficient funds, but fails
to reflect or credit the bank checks and/or replacement checks made
by Debtor to the IRS in regard to those non-sufficient funds.

On Oct. 25, 2016, after the Objection to Claim was filed, the IRS
amended Claim 11-3 by filing Claim 11-4 in the total amount of
$330,790.87.  The IRS Form 410 attached to Claim 11-4 sets forth
FICA and FUTA obligations for the tax periods from Dec. 31, 2012
through Dec. 31, 2014, for taxes owed only by the Debtor, the
entity with a federal tax identification number ending in 2340.

A trial on the Objection to Claim was held on Jan. 25 and 26, 2017.
During trial, the Debtor and the IRS each called witnesses and
introduced exhibits into evidence.  

Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001(f), the Court held that Claim
No. 11 is prima facie evidence of the validity and amount of the
IRS's claim against the Debtor.  The Debtor failed to put forth
sufficient evidence to refute any of the allegations essential to
the legal sufficiency of the IRS's claim.  Therefore, the Court
overruled the Plaintiff's Objection to Claim.  Claim No. 11 is
allowed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 502(b), and the Debtor's tax
liability to the IRS is determined to be $330,790.87 in accordance
with 11 U.S.C. Section 505(a).

The adversary proceeding is MED-X TRANS, INC., Movant, v. UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent, Case No.
15-21942 (JAM)(Bankr. D. Conn.).

A full-text copy of the Court's June 29, 2017 memorandum of
decision is available at https://is.gd/h7MYva from Leagle.com.

Med-X Trans, Inc., Debtor, represented by Anthony S. Novak, Novak
Law Office, P.C..

U. S. Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Steven E. Mackey,
Office of the U.S. Trustee.

                       About Med-X Trans

Headquartered in Plainfield, Connecticut, Med-X Trans, Inc., dba
Med-X Transportation, Inc., dba Med-X Enterprises, is in the
business of providing transportation to clients for non-emergency
medical appointments.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Conn. Case No. 15-21942) on Nov. 6, 2015, listing $486,750 in
total
assets and $1.24 million in total liabilities.  The petition was
signed by Hugh Viele, treasurer.

Judge Ann M. Nevins presides over the case.

Anthony S. Novak, Esq., at Novak Law Office, P.C., serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


MICHAEL BRANIFF: Falkenhagen Buying Richmond Property for $160K
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Leo Braniff asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida to authorize the sale of one parcel of real
property, a single family residence, located at 1814 Settlers
Court, Richmond, Texas, to Marilyn Falkenhagen for $160,000.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor retained a 1/7 interest in the
estate of his deceased father, James J. Braniff ("Decedent"), whom
resided in Texas as of his passing.  The Debtor's 1/7 interest in
the Decedent's estate totals $20,185 ("Debtor's Interest").  The
Decedent's estate included the Property.

On March 14, 2017, the Decedent's estate entered into a contract to
sell the Property for the gross sales price of $160,000 to an
unrelated third party.  The Debtor believes that the $160,000 gross
sales price is the fair market value of the Property given the
offers received and time on the open real estate market.

On April 10, 2017 the Decedent's estate sold the Property.  

The Debtor files the Motion out of an abundance of caution as the
closing agent and title company required all seven heirs of the
Decedent's estate, including the Debtor, to sign both the closing
statement and deed at closing.

The Debtor's 1/7 share of the net sale proceeds from the Property
totaled $20,942 ("Debtor's Proceeds"), and said amount is currently
being held in escrow by the title company, Fidelity National Title.
The Debtor's Proceeds from the sale of the Property exceed the
Debtor's Interest in the Decedent's estate by $756 ("Overage").

The Debtor's Interest in the Decedent's estate was listed his
Schedule B filed in the case which was subsequently amended to
reflect the accurate value of the Debtor's Interest after proper
information was obtained.

The Debtor claimed no exemptions in his interest in the Decedent's
estate, and no creditors had a perfected security interest in the
Debtor's Interest in the Decedent's estate as of the Petition Date.
Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sections 363(b) and 1107 the Debtor is
entitled to sell the Property.  

The Debtor asks the Court to enter an Order (i) approving the sale
of the Property; (ii) directing that the Debtor's Proceeds be
distributed to his Counsel of Record, Lansing Roy, P.A.; (iii)
directing that the Firm issue a check to the Decedent's estate in
the amount of $756 for the Overage; and (iv) directing the Firm
hold the remaining balance of the Debtor's Proceeds ($20,185) in
trust only to be distributed pursuant to the terms of either a
confirmed Chapter 11 Plan or further order of the Court.

The Purchaser can be reached at:

          Marilyn Falkenhagen
          3420 Lancashire Ln.
          Modesto, CA 95350

Counsel for Debtor:

          William B. McDaniel, Esq.
          Kevin B. Paysinger, Esq.
          William B. McDaniel, Esq.
          LANSING ROY, P.A.
          1710 Shadowood Lane, Suite 210
          Jacksonville, FL 32207-2184
          Telephone: (904) 391-0030
          Facsimile: (904) 391-0031
          E-mail: court@lansingroy.com

Michael Leo Braniff sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla.
Case No. 16-03609) on Sept. 27, 2016.  The Debtor tapped William B
McDaniel, Esq., at Lansing Roy, PA as counsel.

The Debtor can be reached at:

          Michael Leo Braniff
          12058 San Jose Blvd., #801
          Jacksonville, FL 32223


MOOD MEDIA: Judge Issues Corrected Chapter 15 Order
---------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael E. Wiles of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York issued a corrected order regarding
Mood Media Corporation and affiliates' petition for recognition of
foreign proceedings, recognition of foreign representative, and
related relief under Chapter 15 of the bankruptcy code.

The Bench Decision, dated June 28, 2017, should be corrected as
follows:

On page 1, in the caption, the name of the case should be corrected
to read "MOOD MEDIA CORPORATION, et al., Debtors in a Foreign
Proceeding." For the avoidance of doubt, "et al.," should be added
after MOOD MEDIA CORPORATION, and "Debtor" should be changed to
"Debtors."

On page 7, in the second full paragraph, three lines up from the
bottom of that paragraph, the word "Candian" should be corrected to
read "Canadian."

A copy of Judge Wiles' Corrected Bench Decision is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-11413-47.pdf

                   About Mood Media Corp

Mood Media Corporation (TSX:MM) -- http://www.moodmedia.com/-- is

provider of in-store audio, visual, and other forms of media and
marketing services in North America and internationally.  Mood
Media Corp was created after the acquisition of Mood Media by
Fluid
Music Canada, Inc. in 2010.  The Company has more than 500,000
active client locations around the globe.  Its clients include
specialist retailers, department stores, supermarkets, financial
institutions and fitness clubs, as well as hotels, car dealerships
and restaurants.

The Company's segments include In-Store Media North America,
In-Store Media International, BIS and Other.  Its In-store
media-North America's operations are based in the United States,
Canada and Latin America.  Its In-store media-International's
operations are based in Europe, Asia and Australia.  BIS is the
Company's audio-visual design and integration subsidiary that
focuses on corporate and commercial applications.  Technomedia
provides audio-visual technology and design for large-scale
commercial applications as well as advertising content creation
and
production solutions.

Mood Media Corporation on May 18, 2017, commenced reorganization
proceedings before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in
Ontario, Canada, to effect a plan of arrangement.

On May 22, 2017, Mood Media Corp. and 14 subsidiaries commenced
Chapter 15 bankruptcy cases (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
17-11413) to seek U.S. recognition of the restructuring
proceedings
in Canada.

The Hon. Michael E. Wiles presides over the Chapter 15 cases.

Michael F. Zendan II, the Executive VP and General Counsel of Mood
Media, was named foreign representative, authorized to sign the
Chapter 15 petitions.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as U.S. counsel to Foreign
Representative, with the engagement led by Joshua Sussberg, Esq.,
and  Edward O. Sassower, P.C., in New York, and James H.M.
Sprayregen, P.C., Adam C. Paul, Esq., Bradley Thomas Giordano,
Esq.,  Whitney C. Fogelberg, Esq., in Chicago.

Stikeman Elliott LLP, is serving as Mood Media's Canadian counsel,
with the engagement led by Alex Rose, Esq., Kathryn Esaw, Esq.,
and
Patrick Corney, Esq.


NAVIDEA BIOPHARMACEUTICALS: Two Directors Elected by Stockholders
-----------------------------------------------------------------
At the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders of Navidea
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., held on June 29, 2017, the stockholders:

   (1) elected Michael M. Goldberg, M.D. and Mark I. Greene, M.D.,
       Ph.D., FRCP as directors of the Company for a term ending
       at the 2020 Annual Meeting;

   (2) approved, on an advisory non-binding basis, the
       compensation of the Company's named executive officers;

   (3) approved, on an advisory non-binding basis, a propal to
       hold future advisory votes on executive compensation once  
       every two years;

   (4) did not approve a potential amendment to the Company's
       amended and restated certificate of incorporation to effect
       a one-for-twenty reverse stock split; and

   (5) ratified the appointment of Marcum LLP, to act as the
       Company's independent registered public accounting firm for

       2017.

In accordance with the voting results, the Board of Directors of
the Company determined to implement an advisory vote to approve the
compensation of the Company's named executive officers every two
years until the next required vote on the frequency of advisory
votes on executive compensation.  The Company is required to hold
such a vote on frequency every six years.

                         About Navidea

Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., is a biopharmaceutical company
focused on the development and commercialization of precision
immunodiagnostic agents and immunotherapeutics.  Navidea is
developing multiple precision-targeted products based on its
Manocept platform to help identify the sites and pathways of
undetected disease and enable better diagnostic accuracy, clinical
decision-making, targeted treatment and, ultimately, patient care.

Navidea reported a net loss of $14.30 million on $21.96 million of
total revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net
loss of $27.56 million on $13.24 million of total revenue for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  

As of March 31, 2017, Navidea had $32.92 million in total assets,
$10.56 million in total liabilities and $22.36 million in total
stockholders' equity.


NEXT GROUP: Signs Employment Pacts with CEO, President and COO
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of Next Group Holdings, Inc., has approved
the employment agreements of Shalom Arik Maimon as the Company's
CEO and Michael De Prado as the Company's president and chief
operating officer.  Both officers had been working under verbal
agreements and these documents formalize the compensation
agreements.

Mr. Maimon's sister, Natali Dadon, is a member of the Board of
Directors.

On June 26, 2017, the Board of Directors of Next Group appointed
Michael De Prado, the Company's president and chief operating
officer, as interim chief financial officer, effective immediately.
Mr. De Prado has served as the Company's president and chief
operating officer since Jan. 15, 2016, and will continue in this
role.

No new compensatory or severance arrangements were entered into in
connection with Mr. De Prado's appointment as interim chief
financial officer.

                   About Next Group Holdings

Next Group Holdings, Inc., formerly Pleasant Kids, Inc., through
its operating subsidiaries, is engaged in the business of using
its technology and certain licensed technology to provide mobile
banking, mobility and telecommunications solutions to underserved,
unbanked and emerging markets.  Its subsidiaries are Meimoun and
Mammon, LLC (100% owned), Next Cala, Inc (94% owned).  NxtGn, Inc.
(65% owned) and Next Mobile 360, Inc. (100% owned).  Additionally,
Next Cala, Inc. has a 60% interest in NextGlocal, a joint venture
formed in May 2016.

Next Group reported a net loss before income taxes of $10.04
million on $1.02 million of total revenue for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016, compared to a net loss before income taxes of $1.19
million on $267,133 of total revenue for the year ended Dec. 31,
2015.  

As of Dec. 31, 2016, Next Group had $718,994 in total assets,
$10.32 million in total liabilities, all current, total
stockholders' deficit of $6.44 million and non-controlling interest
in subsidiaries of $3.15 million.

Assurance Dimensions, Certified Public Accountants, in Coconut
Creek, issued a "going concern" qualification on the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that
the Company had a net loss before non-controlling interest of
$10,041,385 and $1,193,987 and net cash used in operating
activities of $929,442 and $794,377, for the years ended Dec. 31,
2016, and 2015, respectively.  The Company has a working capital
deficit of $9,723,119 and $4,092,479, an accumulated deficit of
$13,499,303 and $4,026,827 as of Dec. 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively.  The auditors said these conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


OAKFABCO INC: Court Issues Amended Opinion on NERC Coverage Dispute
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jack B. Schmetterer of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois issued an amended opinion on New
England Reinsurance Company's amended motion for partial summary
judgment.

This amended opinion states that New England's motion has been
denied by prior order. The original opinion is, thus, withdrawn.

The Troubled Company Reporter reported on June 14, 2017, that the
ambiguities and the existence of competing reasonable inferences
based on the terms of the Binder and Renewal Certificate require
denial of New England's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Judge
Schmetterer said he will deny New England's motion for partial
summary judgment on a separate order.

In this case, the parties' ultimate dispute concerns the maximum
possible recovery by the Debtor in its coverage exhaustion dispute
with New England. The ACC has argued that a certain Renewal
Certificate provides additional liability limits of $10 million
from March 1, 1984, to March 2, 1985, and that the Binder provides
additional $10 million coverage limits for the two-month stub
period not covered by the Renewal Certificate.

A full-text copy of Judge Schmetterer's Amended Opinion dated June
29, 2017, is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb15-27062-490.pdf

                     About Oakfabco, Inc.

Oakfabco, Inc, formerly known as Kewanee Boiler Corporation, has
not manufactured boilers since 1988 when it sold its Kewanee
boiler
business in an 11 U.S.C. Section 363 sale to Coppus Engineering
Corporation. In early 2009, it sold all of its remaining assets.

The Debtor has no employees, and, Frederick W. Stein is the
Debtor's sole officer and director. The Debtor's sole remaining
asset is its insurance, and it has no known liabilities other than
asbestos claims.

In January 1970, Kewanee Boiler Corp, then a newly-formed Illinois
Corporation, acquired the assets and debt of American Standard,
Inc.'s commercial boiler manufacturing division known as "Kewanee
Boiler." The boilers manufactured and sold by Kewanee Boiler were
insulated with asbestos.

Oakfabco sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.
16-27062) on Aug. 7, 2015, to resolve its remaining asbestos
claims. The petition was signed by Frederick W. Stein, president.

Stephen T. Bobo, Esq., Aaron B. Chapin, Esq., Paul M. Singer,
Esq.,
Luke A. Sizemore, Esq., and Joseph D. Filloy, Esq., at Reed Smith
LLP, serves as counsel to the Debtor.

The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and
debt.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 11 appointed four members to the
Asbestos Claimants' Committee in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of
Oakfabco Inc.: Vince Holajn, William E. Gallet, Kristin Leigh
Hart,
and Michael Batchelor. The Asbestos Claimants' Committee is
represented by Frances Gecker, Esq., at FrankGecker LLP.

The Debtor tapped Logan & Company, Inc. as its claims and noticing
agent, and Alan D. Lasko and Associates, P.C. as its tax
accountant.

The Asbestos Claimants' Committee retained Henry Booth and Colin
Gray to provide insurance professional services.


OLYMPIA OFFICE: Has Standing to Challenge MLMT's Claims
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Alan S. Trust of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of New York addresses the standing of Olympia Office LLC
and affiliates to object to the proofs of claim filed by a secured
creditor, as well as certain evidentiary issues raised at and after
trial.

Judge Trust addresses the following:

   - Noteholder NMLMT 2005-MCP1 Washington Office Properties, LLC's
Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay under Bankruptcy Code
Sections 362(d)(1), 362(d)(2), and 362(d)(4).

   - MLMT's Motion for Dismissal or Conversion of Olympia and
affiliates' Bankruptcy Cases under Bankruptcy Code Section 1112(b).


   - Olympia's Opposition to the Relief from Stay Motion and Motion
to Dismiss

   - MLMT's Reply in Support of the Relief from Stay Motion and
Motion to Dismiss

   - Debtors' Motion to Object to Proof of Claim #4-1, filed by
MLMT

   - MLMT's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the POC #4-1
Objection

   - MLMT's Motion to Strike and Evidentiary Objection to Debtors'
Reply

   - MLMT and Debtors' Joint Letter Regarding Admission of Evidence


   - Debtors' Request for admission of Accountant Report

   - Debtors' Request to submit David Bornheimer Deposition
Transcript and Designations

The Debtors assert they have standing to object to the claim and
modify the treatment of Noteholder's rights. However, the parties
do not separate their arguments regarding Debtors' standing to
object to Noteholder's proofs of claim from Debtors' standing to
modify Noteholder's rights through a chapter 11 plan.

Judge Trust opines that if a note holder or owner, or mortgagee, or
servicer acting on behalf thereof, files a proof of claim under
which it asserts a lien against property of the estate, a party in
interest may object to the claim and seek a determination that the
claimant is not entitled to enforce the note or mortgage at issue,
or that the note or mortgage are not enforceable against the debtor
or the estate; a bankruptcy court may make such a determination
after notice and a hearing.

Further, Debtors are debtors in possession acting as fiduciaries of
the bankruptcy estates and thus have a duty to object to an
improper claim if it serves a purpose. The property of Debtors'
estates includes the Properties at issue here, which are encumbered
by the Loans. Noteholder filed a proof of claim against Debtors’
estates relating to property of the estates. Debtors have a direct
legal and pecuniary interest in objecting to the Noteholder's claim
and such an objection serves a purpose to the estates. Thus,
Debtors have standing to challenge Noteholder's claims.

In addressing Noteholder's assertion that Debtors may not modify
its rights through a chapter 11 plan of reorganization, Judge Trust
asserts that Noteholder's claim is not secured only by a security
interest in real property that is Debtors' principal residence.
Thus, from the clear and unambiguous language of section 1123(b),
Debtors have standing to propose a chapter 11 plan of
reorganization that modifies Noteholder's rights. The Bankruptcy
Code should not be read to allow the anomalous result which would
ensue if a creditor holding a claim had standing to exercise its
rights while at the same time a debtor would be precluded from
having standing to exercise its statutory rights in regard to that
claim.

After analyzing all the arguments presented in each issue, Judge
Trust orders the following:

   -- That Debtors have standing to proceed on their claim
objection;

   -- That Debtors have standing to propose a plan of
reorganization that modifies Noteholder's rights as a holder of a
secured claim;

   -- That the Bondholder Reports are admitted into evidence;

   -- That the excerpts of the April 12 Bornheimer Deposition
attached to the Motion to Modify are admitted but the remainder is
not admitted and Noteholder's April 12 counter-designations are
admitted;

   -- That Debtors' May 23, 2017, Bornheimer Deposition
designations are admitted and Noteholder’s May 23 deposition
counter-designations are admitted;

   -- That Debtors are directed to file the May 23 Deposition
through the Court’s CM/ECF filing system by no later than July 7,
2017;

   -- That the Accountant Report is not admitted;

   -- That Exhibit 143 is not admitted;

   -- That Exhibits 156-162 are not admitted; and

   -- That Noteholder's and Debtors' deadline to each file a list
of the admitted exhibits it intends to refer to at the closing
arguments scheduled for July 12, 2017, under this Court’s Amended
Order Scheduling Closing Argument is hereby extended to July 7,
2017, at 4:00 pm EDT.

A full-text copy of Judge Trust's Order dated June 30, 2017, is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb8-16-74892-283.pdf

                  About Olympia Office

Olympia Office LLC, based in Cedarhurst, NY, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-74892) on Oct. 20, 2016.
The
petition was signed by Sung II Han, vice president.  The Hon. Alan
S Trust presides over the case.  In its petition, the Debtor
estimated $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.

The affiliates of Olympia Office LLC:  WA Portfolio LLC; Mariners
Portfolio LLC; and Seahawk Portfolio LLC filed separate Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 16-75515, 16-75516
and 16-75517, respectively) on Nov. 28, 2016.  At the time of
filing, each of the debtor-affiliates had $10 million to $50
million in estimated assets and $50 million to $100 million in
estimated liabilities.

The Debtors are represented by Jordan Pilevsky, Esq., at Lamonica
Herbst & Maniscalco LLP.  The Debtors employ Kiemle & Hagood
Company and Kidder Mathews as real estate brokers; and Demasco,
Sena & Jahelka LLP as accountant.


PARAGON OFFSHORE: Court Won't Stay Plan Order Pending Appeal
------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hammersley and Marcel de Groot have taken an appeal from
the Delaware Bankruptcy Court's order confirming the Fifth Joint
Chapter 11 Plan of Paragon Offshore plc and its affiliated
debtors.

On Wednesday, the Bankruptcy Court denied Messrs. Hammersley and
Groot's motion to stay the confirmation order pending their
appeal.

"The Motion is DENIED for the reasons stated on the record at the
Hearing," Judge Christopher S. Sontchi said.

The Court confirmed the Plan on June 7, 2017.  The approved Plan
provides no recovery to equity holders.

The Debtors have balked at the request to stay the confirmation
order.  The Debtors are seeking to consummate the Plan as soon as
July 7.

Messrs. Hammersley and de Groot argued that shareholders
effectively have been sidelined since the filing of the Plan.  They
argued that the Plan does not properly value the Debtors' business
and all of their assets or attribute any value to the Noble claims
that are being distributed to various creditors through shares in a
litigation trust.

A group of shareholders had asked the Court to appoint an official
committee to represent their interests.  But the court denied the
request.

Messrs. Hammersley and de Groot said they have retained counsel in
the United Kingdon to review significant issues relating to whether
the Debtors had the appropriate corporate authority to take the
actions they did in the U.S. and whether the rights of the
shareholders under U.K. law have been violated.  

"A stay of the Confirmation Order will provide Shareholders a
meaningful ability to pursue these significant issues in the UK and
potentially prevent the manifest injustice that would occur if the
Debtors were able to use U.S. bankruptcy procedure to circumvent UK
shareholder protections," Messrs. Hammersley and de Groot argued.

The Debtors, however, said the appellants are not entitled to a
stay pending appeal.  They argued that the burden is on Messrs.
Hammersley and de Groot but the appellants have not shown a
reasonable chance of success on the merits of their appeal.  The
appellants were already given their day in court but failed to
present any evidence to controvert the record made by the Debtors.

The Debtors also argued that if the Court were inclined to grant a
stay, the appellants should be required to post a $500 million
bond.  The amount represents the sum of the difference of the
midpoint value of the Enterprise Value -- roughly $445 million --
and the incremental costs of professional fees over an 18-month
stay period, which is roughly $55 million.

An early iteration of the Plan -- the Debtors' Modified Second
Amended Joint Chapter Plan -- filed in August 2016 proposed that
equity holders were to receive 53% of new common equity.  

Under that Plan, the Debtors proposed reinstating the term lenders'
debt, distributing $165 million of cash and new debt for the
balance of their claim to the revolver lenders, and lowering
distributions to the bondholders so that the bondholders would only
receive $285 million of cash but no deferred cash payments, 47% of
new common equity, and $60 million of new take-back notes due
2021.

Following a confirmation trial in September 2016, the Court denied
confirmation of that Plan.

In January 2017, Paragon filed a Third Plan of Reorganization,
which completely eliminated all equity interest holders.  The
Debtors filed their Fourth Joint Chapter 11 Plan in April and the
Fifth Joint Chapter 11 Plan in May.

The Fifth Joint Plan proposes to pay general unsecured creditors
30% of their Class 5 claims allowed by the court.  The amount of
allowed claims is estimated at $14 million.

An earlier version of the plan proposed to pay general unsecured
creditors between 23% and 28% of their claims, and estimated the
total amount of allowed claims at $2.46 billion.  It also
classified general unsecured claims in Class 4.

Under the Fifth Plan, senior notes claims are classified in Class 4
and claimants will recover approximately 35%.  The estimated amount
of allowed Class 4 claims is $1.021 billion.

Messrs. Hammersley and de Groot are represented by:

     Mark E. Felger, Esq.
     Simon E. Fraser, Esq.
     Keith L. Kleinman, Esq.
     COZEN O'CONNOR
     1201 North Market St., Suite 1001
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Telephone: 302-295-2000

          - and -

     Craig A. Barbarosh, Esq.
     Karen B. Dine, Esq.
     Jerry L. Hall, Esq.
     KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
     575 Madison Avenue
     New York, NY 11238
     Telephone: 212-940-8772

                     About Paragon Offshore

Houston, Texas-based Paragon Offshore plc (OTC: PGNPQ) --
http://www.paragonoffshore.com/-- is a global provider of offshore

drilling rigs.  Paragon is a public limited company registered in
England and Wales.

Paragon Offshore Plc, et al., filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions
(Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 16-10385 to 16-10410) on Feb. 14, 2016,
after reaching a deal with lenders on a reorganization plan that
would eliminate $1.1 billion in debt.  The petitions were signed
by
Randall D. Stilley as authorized representative.

Judge Christopher S. Sontchi is assigned to the cases.

The Debtors reported total assets of $2.47 billion and total debt
of $2.96 billion as of Sept. 30, 2015.

The Debtors engaged Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as general counsel;
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. as local counsel; Lazard Freres &
Co. LLC as financial advisor; Alixpartners, LLP, as restructuring
advisor; PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor and tax advisor;
and
Kurtzman Carson Consultants as claims and noticing agent.

No request has been made for the appointment of a trustee or an
examiner in the cases.

On Jan. 27, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Paul, Weiss, Rifkind,
Wharton & Garrison LLP serves as main counsel to the Committee and
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP acts as co-counsel.  The
committee retained Ducera Partners LLC as financial advisor.

Counsel to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (a) as administrative agent
under the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of
June 17, 2014, and (b) as collateral agent under the Guaranty and
Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2014, are Sandeep
Qusba,
Esq., and Kathrine A. McLendon, Esq., at Simpson Thacher &
Bartlett
LLP.  PJT Partners serves as its financial advisor.

Delaware counsel to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. are Landis Rath &
Cobb LLP's Adam G. Landis, Esq.; Kerri K. Mumford, Esq.; and
Kimberly A. Brown, Esq.

Counsel to Cortland Capital Market Services L.L.C. as
administrative agent under the Senior Secured Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of July 18, 2014, are Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP's
Scott D. Talmadge, Esq.; Benjamin Mintz, Esq.; and Madlyn G.
Primoff, Esq.

Delaware counsel to Cortland Capital Market Services L.L.C. are
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP's Jeremy W. Ryan, Esq.; Ryan M.
Murphy, Esq.; and D. Ryan Slaugh, Esq.

Counsel to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as trustee under
the Senior Notes Indenture, dated as of July 18, 2014, for the
6.75% Senior Notes due 2022 and the 7.25% Senior Notes due 2024,
are Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius LLP's James O. Moore, Esq.; Glenn E.
Siegel, Esq.; and Joshua Dorchak, Esq.

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP serves as legal counsel to the
Term Loan Agent and FTI Consulting, Inc. serves as its financial
advisor.

                          *     *     *

Paragon Offshore said June 7, 2017, that the Bankruptcy Court has
approved the Company's consensual plan of reorganization.  Under
the Consensual Plan, which the Company announced May 2, 2017,
Paragon's existing equity will be deemed worthless and the
company's secured creditors and unsecured bondholders will receive
equity in a new reorganized parent company.

Under the Consensual Plan of Reorganization, approximately $2.4
billion of previously existing debt will be eliminated in exchange
for a combination of cash and to-be-issued new equity.  If
confirmed, the Secured Lenders will receive their pro rata share of
$410 million in cash and 50% of the new, to-be-issued common
equity, subject to dilution.  The Bondholders will receive $105
million in cash and an estimated 50% of the new, to-be-issued
common equity, subject to dilution. The Secured Lenders and
Bondholders will each appoint three members of a new board of
directors to be constituted upon emergence of the Company from
bankruptcy and will agree on a candidate for Chief Executive
Officer who will serve as the seventh member of the board of
directors of the Company.

As a necessary component of the Consensual Plan, Paragon Offshore
filed before the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division,
Companies Court of England and Wales an application for
administration in the United Kingdom and sought an order appointing
two partners of Deloitte LLP as administrators of the company.  The
application was granted on May 23, 2017.

Neville Barry Kahn and David Philip Soden were appointed Joint
Administrators of Paragon Offshore Plc on May 23, 2017.  The
affairs, business and property of the Company are managed by the
Joint Administrators.  The Joint Administrators act as agents of
the Company and contract without personal liability.


PARAGON POOLS: Court Confirms Amended Reorganization Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge August B. Landis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada issued an order approving the first amended
disclosure statement and confirming the first amended plan of
reorganization filed by Paragon Pools Corporation.

The Court rules that the Disclosure Statement contains adequate
information as required by Section 1125(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Court also finds that the Plan complies with Section 1129(a)(7)
of the Bankruptcy Code in that each holder of a Claim or Equity
Interest will receive and retain under the Plan on account of such
Claim or Equity Security property of a value, as of the Effective
Date of the Plan that is not less than the amount that such holder
would so receive or retain if the Debtor was liquidated under
Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, on such date.

The Plan's treatment of Allowed Administrative Claims, Allowed
Priority Non-Tax Claims, and other unclassified priority claims as
set forth in Section 507(a) of the Bankruptcy Code also satisfies
the requirements set forth in Section 1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy
Code because, except to the extent that the Holder of a particular
Claim has agreed to a different treatment of such Claim, the Plan
provides that (i) the Holder of each Allowed Administrative Claim
shall be paid in full, in Cash; and (ii) the Holders of Allowed
Secured Tax Claims shall be paid in full, in Cash, or in such
amounts and on such other terms as may be agreed to by the Holders
of such Claims and the Debtor, or according to the ordinary
business terms of the Debtor and such Holders.

A copy of the First Amended Plan of Reorganization is available
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nev16-16342-104.pdf

                    About Paragon Pools

Based in Las Vegas, Nevada, Paragon Pools Corporation is a
licensed
and bonded contractor that designs and constructs inground custom
pools and spas for commercial and residential properties
throughout
the Las Vegas Valley and surrounding areas. The Debtor was founded
in 2001 by Joseph M. Vassallo

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No.
16-16342) on Nov. 28, 2016.  The petition was signed by Joseph M.
Vassallo, president.  In its petition, the Debtor declared $23,554
in total assets and $1.57 million in total liabilities.  

Judge August B. Landis, presides over the case.  Ryan Andersen of
Andersen Law serves as bankruptcy counsel.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 19 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb16-16342.pdf  


PATRIOT SOLAR: Vanguard Energy's Bid to Arbitrate Claim Denied
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge John T. Gregg of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Michigan denied Vanguard Energy Partners, LLC's Motion
requesting relief from the automatic stay to continue to arbitrate
its claims and effectuate rights of setoff and/or recoupment
against Debtor Patriot Solar Group, LLC.

The Debtor, its prepetition secured lender, and one of its largest
general unsecured creditors objected to the Motion because
enforcement of the arbitration provisions in various contracts
between Vanguard and the Debtor would conflict with the underlying
purposes of bankruptcy in this recently filed Chapter 11 case. They
further argue that because Vanguard's claims are disputed and
unliquidated, Vanguard's request for setoff and/or recoupment is
premature.

The sole issues before the court are whether an inherent conflict
exists between arbitration and the underlying purposes of the
Bankruptcy Code and, if so, whether the court should exercise its
discretion by declining to enforce the parties' agreement to
arbitrate.

In its Motion, Vanguard devotes minimal discussion to the specific
facts of this case. As its primary argument, Vanguard relies on
Hermoyian, this time for the proposition that forums other than
bankruptcy courts frequently determine the validity and amount of a
debt owed by a debtor to a creditor. While Hermoyian is
well-reasoned, it is distinguishable from the facts in this case.
Unlike in Hermoyian, Vanguard and the Debtor were not on the cusp
of a trial, and the arbitration had yet to commence beyond the
scheduling of the initial conference. Moreover, because Vanguard
has not come forward with a proposed arbitration schedule, the
court is unable to determine if efficiency would be promoted by
enforcing the agreement to arbitrate. Vanguard's reliance on
Hermoyian is therefore misplaced given the facts and circumstances
in this case.

The court is more persuaded by the arguments advanced by the
Debtor. The Debtor directs this court to White Mountain Mining Co.,
L.L.C., where the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the
lower courts' decisions that an inherent conflict existed between
arbitration and bankruptcy.

This court agrees with the reasoning in White Mountain Mining Co.
at this stage of the Debtor's case. One of the underlying purposes
of bankruptcy is to provide the debtor with a breathing spell
during which it can develop a strategy for its exit from
bankruptcy.

At the hearing on the Motion, the Debtor advised the court that it
anticipated filing a plan of reorganization. The Debtor further
noted that recommencement of the arbitration, including the
assertion of setoff rights against Huntington’s collateral, would
interfere with its efforts to execute a rehabilitation strategy.
Because this case is less than four months old, the court agrees
that the Debtor should be given a reasonable period of time to
propose a plan or market its assets for sale without simultaneously
having to devote significant time and resources towards arbitration
with Vanguard.

Finally, the court notes that granting relief from the automatic
stay to allow arbitration might result in piecemeal litigation.
Although the Subcontractor Agreements require arbitration of any
disputes arising thereunder, Vanguard is also seeking to arbitrate
its claims against the Debtor for breach of the Purchase Orders,
under which Vanguard claims separate damages. The Purchase Orders
were not attached to the Motion, and at the hearing Vanguard was
unable to definitively state whether they contain an arbitration
provision or somehow incorporate the terms of the Subcontractor
Agreements.

Based on the specific facts and circumstances of this recently
filed Chapter 11 case, Judge Gregg concludes that an inherent
conflict exists between arbitration and the underlying purposes of
bankruptcy. The Debtor has satisfied its burden, at least for the
time being, that arbitration at this stage of the case would
circumvent the objectives of Chapter 11. Moreover, Vanguard has not
sufficiently pled its requests to exercise setoff and/or
recoupment. The Motion is therefore denied without prejudice.

A full-text copy of Judg Gregg's Opinion is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/miwb17-00984-64.pdf

Attorney for Patriot Solar Group, LLC:

     Cody H. Knight, Esq.
     RAYMAN & KNIGHT
     Kalamazoo, Michigan
     chk@raymanknight.com

Attorney for Vanguard Energy Partners, LLC:

     Julie Beth Teicher, Esq.
     ERMAN, TEICHER, ZUCKER & FREEDMAN, P.C.
     Southfield, Michigan
     jteicher@ermanteicher.com

Attorney for Huntington National Bank:

     David E. Bevins, Esq.
     RHOADES McKEE P.C.
     Grand Rapids, Michigan
     debevins@rhoadesmckee.com

Attorney for Shape Corporation:

     Elisabeth Von Eitzen, Esq.
     WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD, LLP,
     Grand Rapids, Michigan
     evoneitzen@wnj.com

                 About Patriot Solar Group

Patriot Solar Group, LLC, doing business as Patriot Solar, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Mich. Case No. 17-00984), on
March
6, 2017.  The petition was signed by Jeffery J. Mathie, manager.
The case is assigned to Judge John T. Gregg.  The Debtor is
represented by Cody H. Knight, Esq. at Rayman & Knight.  At the
time of filing, the Debtor had both assets and liabilities
estimated to be between $1 million to $10 million.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed
and
no trustee or examiner has been appointed in the Debtor's case.


PAYLESS HOLDINGS: July 24 Plan Outline Hearing
----------------------------------------------
Judge Kathy A. Surratt-States of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Missouri issued an amended order approving the
adequacy of Payless Holdings LLC and affiliates' disclosure
statement describing their fourth amended joint chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

July 18, 2017, at 4:00 p.m. prevailing Central Time is the deadline
for filing an objection to confirmation of the Plan.

July 21, 2017, at 4:00 p.m. prevailing Central Time is the deadline
by which the Debtors or other parties supporting the Plan intend to
file their reply to objections to confirmation of the Plan filed
and served as set forth herein.

July 24, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. prevailing Central Time is the date
and time the Confirmation Hearing is scheduled to begin before the
Honorable Kathy A. Surratt-States, United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, Thomas F.
Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 S. 10th Street, 7th Floor – North
Courtroom, St. Louis, MO 63102.

The Trouble Company Reporter previously reported that latest plan
proposes to increase the estimated recovery for creditors holding
Class 5A, which consists of "other general unsecured claims" to
18.1%.  Earlier versions of the plan proposed a 0.8% recovery for
Class 5A.

The plan also proposes to increase the estimated recovery for
holders of Class 5B claims to 22.1% from 15.7%.  Class 5B consists
of general unsecured claims against Payless ShoeSource Worldwide,
Inc.

A copy of the fourth amended disclosure statement is available
without charge at:   

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/PaylessHoldings_4DS062317.pdf

                     About Payless Holdings

Payless Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Lead Case No.
17-42267) on April 4, 2017.  The petitions were signed by Paul J.
Jones, chief executive officer.   At the time of the filing, the
Debtors estimated their assets at $500 million to $1 billion and
liabilities at $1 billion to $10 billion.   

Payless -- http://www.payless.com/-- was founded in 1956 as an   
everyday footwear retailer.  The Company is headquartered in
Topeka, Kansas, but its operations span across Asia, the Middle
East, Latin America, Europe, and the United States.  Payless first
traded publicly in 1962, and was taken private in May 2012.
Payless
Holdings, LLC currently owns, directly or indirectly, each of its
91 subsidiaries.

As of the bankruptcy filing, Payless had more than 4,000 stores in
more than 30 countries, and employed approximately 22,000 people.
In April 2017, it sought court approval to close an initial 389
stores. In May it sought court approval to close 408 more stores
but later reduced the list to 216 stores.

The Debtors hired Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC as
restructuring advisor; Prime Clerk LLC as claims, balloting and
administrative agent; and Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP as CCAA
counsel.

On April 14, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The unsecured
creditors
committee has tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as lead
counsel to the Committee, Polsinelli PC as its local counsel, and
Province Inc. as financial advisor.  The committee has retained
Back Bay Management Corp. and its division The Michael-Shaked
Group
as expert consultant.

On April 25, 2017, the Debtors filed a disclosure statement, which
explains its proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.  The
Debtors' plan, if confirmed and implemented, would reduce their
debt to $469 million.


PELICAN REAL ESTATE: Liquidating Trustee Hires Krigel as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Maria M. Yip, the Chapter 11 Liquidating Trustee for Pelican Real
Estate, LLC, et al., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida for permission to employ Krigel & Krigel, PC as
her special counsel.

The Chapter 11 Liquidating Trustee requires Krigel to represent her
at the Hearings for Foreclosure of Liens for Delinquent Land Taxes
by action in rem.

Krigel agree to be compensated to attend the Hearings for a flat
fee of $1,200 to be paid upon the entry of an order approving this
application.

Because the Liquidating Trust Agreement contemplates payment to
pre-confirmation professionals before post-confirmation
professionals are paid, the Liquidating Trustee requests that the
Court modify the Liquidating Trust Agreement to permit Krigel to be
paid in the requested manner if no party in interest objects.

Kelsey Naza, Esq., attorney of the law of Krigel & Krigel, PC,
assured the Court that his firm does not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Krigel can be reached at:

     Kelsey Naza, Esq.
     Krigel & Krigel, PC
     4520 Main Street, Suite 700
     Kansas City, MI 64111
     Tel: (816) 756-5800

                   About Pelican Real Estate, LLC

Pelican Real Estate, LLC and its eight affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Lead Case
No. 16-03817) on June 8, 2016.  The petition was signed by Jared
Crapson, president of SMFG, Inc., manager of Pelican Management
Company, LLC. At the time of the filing, Pelican Real Estate listed
under $50,000 in both assets and debts.

The Debtors are represented by Elizabeth A. Green, Esq., at Baker &
Hostetler LLP.  The Debtors hire Bill Maloney Consulting as their
financial advisor; Hammer Herzog and Associates P.A. as their
accountant; and Pino Nicholson PLLC as their special counsel.

Turnkey Investment Fund LLC, an affiliate of Pelican Real Estate
LLC, hires Dance Bigelow Sharp & Co. as accountant.

Guy Gebhardt, acting U.S. trustee for Region 21, on July 27 formed
an official committee of unsecured creditors for Pelican Real
Estate LLC's affiliates, Smart Money Secured Income Fund LLC and
Accelerated Asset Group LLC.

Maria Yip, the court-appointed examiner, proposes to hire
GrayRobinson, P.A. to provide legal services in connection with the
Debtor's bankruptcy case, and Fikso Kretschmer Smith Dixon Ormseth
PS as special counsel.


PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY: Trustee Selling Odenton Property for $390K
--------------------------------------------------------------
Charles R. Goldstein, the Liquidating Trustee of the estate of The
People's Community Health Centers, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maryland to authorize the sale of the
Debtor's real and personal property located at 1370 Odenton Road,
Odenton, Maryland, to Christopher Wagner or his designated
assignee, for $390,000, subject to higher and better offers.

The Debtor owns the Real Property.  Its scheduled property value is
$576,000.

The Real Property is free of any consensual mortgage liens, but is,
however, subject to certain indexed judgment liens and a tax lien
in favor of the Internal Revenue Service, as follows:

                                        Post-Judgement
  Creditor      Index Amt  Index Date      Interest     Total
  --------      ---------  ----------      --------     -----
   IRS          $463,926   5/16/2014                  $293,605
Lelin Chao       $45,874   5/16/2014       $15,057     $60,931
AMJ Landscaping   $4,349   9/14/2014        $1,211      $5,560
                                                      --------
                                       Liens Total    $360,096

On June 22, 2017, the Debtor (by the Liquidating Trustee), as
Seller, and Christopher Wagner (or his designated assignee) as
Buyer, executed a Real Estate Purchase Contract ("Contract") for
the purchase of the Property.

The salient terms of the Contract are:

          a. Buyer: Christopher Wagner or his designated assignee

          b. Purchase Price: $390,000

          c. Deposit: $12,000- Refundable until expiration of Study
Period

          d. Study Period: 40 days following date that the Order of
the Court approving the Contract becomes final and non-appealable

          e. Closing: 10 days following the expiration of the Study
Period, or 10 days following receipt by the Buyer of County
approval of the Buyer's intended use as a medical office

          f. Brokers: Broker for Liquidating Trustee: EA Commercial
Real Estate

          g. Broker Commission to EA Commercial Real Estate is to
be 7.5% of the gross sales price, or $29,250.  The Buyer will pay
costs of title examination, title insurance, and any survey he may
order.  Customary closing costs: notary fees, taxes, processing
fees are to be split evenly between the Buyer and the Seller.  The
Seller will use best efforts to achieve waiver of transfer and
recordation taxes.  If unsuccessful, taxes will be split between
the parties.

          h. Other Terms: Subject to Court approval, and to higher
and better offers

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Peoples_Community_434_Sales.pdf

The Liquidating Trustee anticipates that bidding will take place
for the purchase of the Property on or before hearing on approval
of the Contract.  He does not propose To limit credit bidding of
any eligible creditor.  Nonetheless, he does not expect any credit
bidding by secured creditors.

The Proceeds will be applied to liens against the Real Property in
order of their priority.  There are no unexpired leasehold
interests in the Property.  The proposed sale is to be a sale free
and clear of Liens, interests and encumbrances.

The Purchaser:

          Christopher Wagner
          832 Maple Road
          Gambrills, MD 21054

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Lisa Bittle Tancredi, Esq.
          GEBHARDT & SMITH, LLP
          One South St., Suite 2200
          Baltimore, MD 21202
          E-mail: Itancredi@gebsmith.com

            About The People's Community Health Centers
    
The People's Community Health Centers, Inc. is a health care
industry based at 1734 Maryland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.

The People's Community Health Centers, Inc., formerly known as
Medhealth of Maryland, Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Md. Case No. 15-10228) on Jan. 7, 2015.

The Debtor estimated assets at $3.04 million and liabilities at
$6.73 million.

The Debtor tapped Michael Stephen Myers, Esq., at Scarlett, Croll &
Myers, P.A. as counsel.

The petition was signed by William A. Green, managing agent.

On Nov. 13, 2015 the Court approved the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors Disclosure Statement, and confirmed the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Modified Amended Plan of
Liquidation.


PHARMACOGENETICS DIAGNOSTIC: PM Buying All Assets for $650K
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pharmacogenetics Diagnostic Laboratory, LLC, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Kentucky to authorize
the bidding procedures in connection with the sale of substantially
all assets to Prescient Medicine Holdings, LLC ("PM") for $650,000,
subject to overbid.

The Debtor's financial condition continues to deteriorate.
Pursuant to the operating reports filed for November 2016 through
April 2017, it has been operating at a loss nearly every month.  It
reasonably believes that it can continue to operate in its current
financial state for 60 more days. Its staff has been reduced from
21 at the inception of the case to just four as of the date of the
Motion.

The Debtor's assets are comprised primarily of its equipment,
fixtures, inventory, tangible and intangible property.  The Debtor
desires to conduct an expedited asset sale with the goal of keeping
the business in operation.

PM is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place
of business located in Hummelstown, Pennsylvania.  It provides
pharmacogenetic testing for medical providers and direct patient
services.

The Debtor has selected PM as the stalking horse bidder for the
purchase for its assets for the purpose of establishing a minimum
acceptable bid with which to begin bidding at the Auction.  It
believes that the Auction utilizing the LOI from the Purchaser as
the stalking horse bid and offering protections to the Purchaser as
the stalking horse bidder for an expedited sale ("Asset Sale") of
the Debtor is in the best interest of its estate and creditors.  It
also believes the expedited sale is in the best interest of the
local community.

PM has performed and will continue to perform due diligence
regarding the purchase.  The parties have negotiated, in good faith
and at arm's-length, the terms of a definitive agreement, and they
desire to enter into the LOI and subsequently an asset purchase
agreement.  Accordingly, the Debtor asks approval of the Procedures
Order and the subsequent approval of the LOI at the Sale Hearing.

Pursuant to the APA, the Debtor will (i) sell substantially all of
the Assets used in its operations, free and clear of all liens,
claims, interests, and encumbrances; and (ii) assume and assign to
PM the Assumed Contracts.  The APA was negotiated at arm's-length
and in good faith by Debtor and PM, after meeting with the Debtor's
largest Prepetition Lender, following thorough consideration of the
Debtor's possible restructuring alternatives.  The Debtor believes
the consideration to be received from the Asset Sale as set forth
in the APA, subject to the ability of interested parties to submit
competing proposals for the Assets, will result in the highest and
best value for Debtor's estates, creditors, and interest holders.

The salient terms of the APA are:

          a. Purchase Price: On the Closing Date, PM will (i) pay
to Debtor $500,000 upon closing of the sale and $150,000 from
earnings over the next three years for a total purchase price of
$650,000 in cash, and (ii) assume certain liabilities of the
Debtor.

          b. Assets: The proposed sale will include the Assets
which comprise substantially all of the value of the Debtor.

          c. Sale Free and Clear: The Assets are to be transferred
free and clear of all Encumbrances other than the Assumed
Liabilities.

          d. Assumption of Executory Contracts and Leases: The
Seller will assume and assign to the Buyer all of the Seller's
rights under, title to, and interest in the Assumed Contracts.  PM
may on any business day up to July 28, 2017, provide written notice
to Debtor of any Designated Contract PM desires to be an Assumed
Contract.  There are not any past defaults under the Assumed
Contracts, or the existence of no past defaults is a condition to
the closing of the Asset Sale.

          e. Conditions to Closing: Conditions to consummation of
the Asset Sale will include, among other things (i) entry of the
Procedures Order, (ii) approval by the Court of the Asset Sale;
(iii) closing of the transaction by Aug. 31, 2017; and (iv) receipt
of necessary third-party approvals.

          f. Break-Up Fee: The APA provides for payment of a
break-up fee up to the amount of $53,000 to the Buyer in the event
the Court authorizes the sale of the Assets to an entity other than
the Buyer.

A copy of the APA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

  
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Pharmacogenetics_Diagnostic_144_Sales.pdf

Other than PM, no purchaser willing to execute a definitive
purchase agreement has emerged during the course of the bankruptcy
case, but the Debtor has received another letter of intent for a
lesser amount.  The Debtor has determined the proposed structure
for the Bidding Procedures is the one most likely to maximize the
realizable value of the Assets for the benefit of its estate and
creditors and other interested parties.  In addition, the APA
requires the Debtor to obtain the Procedures Order as a means of
implementing the Asset Sale to PM.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

          a. Qualified Bid: Must be greater than $725,000

          b. Break-Up Fee: $53,000

          c. Auction: The Auction will be conducted at the offices
of Kaplan & Partners LLP, 710 W. Main Street, 4th Floor,
Louisville, Kentucky , on the date determined by the Court at the
Bidding Procedure Hearing.

          d. Bid Increments: $25,000

          e. Credit Bid: The Prepetition Lender may not credit bid
the secured debt of the Debtor held by such lender.

As part of the Motion, the Debtor also asks authority to assume and
assign the Assumed Contracts to PM or the Successful Bidder.  If an
objection by the non-debtor contracting party is made only with
respect to the Cure Amount, a hearing to fix the Cure Amount will
be set contemporaneously with the Sale Hearing.  Accordingly, any
Cure Amounts to be paid under any Assumed Contract will also be
paid upon the closing of the Asset Sale or as soon thereafter as
the Cure Amount is fixed and accepted by PM.

PM has offered substantial value for the assets and is willing to
close within 60 days, and thereby enable Debtor to reduce the risk
that the Debtor's value will further deteriorate.  Moreover, by
selling the Assets now, the Debtor will relieve itself of certain
ongoing costs and expenses, thereby minimizing administrative
expenses and maximizing creditor recoveries.  Thus, a
well-articulated business reasons exist for approving the Asset
Sale.  Accordingly, the Debtor asks the Court to approve the relief
sought.

The Purchaser:

          PRESCIENT MEDICINE HOLDINGS, LLC
          1214 Research Blvd.
          Suite 1000
          Hummelstown, PA 17036
          Facsimile: (717) 256-7959
          Attn: Keri Donaldson, MD, MSCE

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Cynthia Y. Reisz
          BASS BERRY & SIMS PLC
          150 Third Avenue South
          Suite 2800
          Nashville TN 37201
          Facsimile: 52T(615) 742-2783

              About Pharmacogenetics Diagnostic

Pharmacogenetics Diagnostic Laboratory, LLC is a Kentucky limited
liability company founded in 2004 by Dr. Roland Valdes, Jr. and Dr.
Mark W. Linder. Dr. Valdes is a professor and senior vice-chairman
of the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, professor
of biochemistry and molecular biology, and holds the appointment of
Distinguished University Scholar at the University of Louisville.
Dr. Linder is a professor in the Department of Pathology and
Laboratory Medicine at the University of Louisville and is the
director of Clinical Chemistry and Toxicology at the
University of Louisville Hospital.

The company is a commercial and research laboratory for
pharmacogenetics working to
bring genetic drug sensitivity testing into the medical mainstream.
It offers molecular diagnostic testing and interpretive services
to physicians, clinics, and hospitals.  Its principal office is
located at The Nucleus Building, 201 E. Jefferson Street, Suite
309, Louisville, Kentucky 40202.

In March 2011, University of Louisville Foundation, Inc. ("ULF")
made a capital
contribution to Debtor and was admitted as a member of it. Tge
Debtor's membership interests are owned as follows: Dr. Valdes,
59.68%, Dr. Linder, 8.15%, and ULF, 32.17%.  The Debtor's Board of
Directors are: Dr. Valdes, Dr. Linder, and Robert Proulx as elected
by the Board.

Pharmacogenetics Diagnostic Laboratory, LLC, d/b/a PGXL
Laboratories, d/b/a PGX Laboratories, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 16-33404) on Nov. 8, 2016.  The petition
was signed by Dr. Roland Valdes, Jr., president/CEO.  The case is
assigned to Judge Thomas H. Fulton.  The Debtor estimated assets
at
$500,000 to $1 million, and liabilities at $10 million to $50
million at the time of the filing.

The Debtor's bankruptcy attorney is Charity Bird Neukomm, Esq., at
Kaplan & Partners LLP.  

The Debtor tapped Kathie McDonald-McClure, Esq. of Wyatt, Tarrant
&
Combs, LLP as special counsel in matters relating to intellectual
property and to a post-payment Medicare audit.  The Debtor also
engaged Robert L. Brown, Esq., at Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP, as
special counsel regarding corporate matters.

The Debtor hired William G. Meyer III and Strothman and Company as
accountant.


PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC: Creditors Notified of July 12 Meeting
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Laura Taylor Swain on June 23, 2017, entered an order
appointing a mediation team for the now jointly administered Title
III cases styled In re: The Financial Oversight and Management
Board for Puerto Rico, as representative of the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, et al., No. 17 BK 3283-LTS and related proceedings.

That order also included subsequently filed Title III cases and
proceedings, including the above-captioned case for the Puerto Rico
Electric Power Authority ("PREPA").

Consistent with that order, and in furtherance of the mediation
team's efforts to facilitate a consensual resolution of the issues
raised in all of the cases and proceedings, including PREPA's case,
the mediation team gives notice of an initial, confidential
mediation meeting with certain of the mediation team members to
parties in interest in PREPA's case.  

The meeting, which will be organizational and non-substantive in
nature, will be held on July 12, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. (prevailing
Eastern Time) in the Ceremonial Courtroom of the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York, Daniel
Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 9th Floor, 500 Pearl Street, New York,
NY 10007.

Any party in interest in PREPA's case who wishes to attend the
meeting may submit a written request indicating the party's name,
the nature of its interest in the cases and related proceedings,
the name(s) of its counsel, and any other information that would
assist the mediation team leader in evaluating the request,
including whether it was required to attend the July 12, 2017
meeting pursuant to the Order and Notice of Meeting with
Representatives of Mediation Team entered on June 30, 2017 in the
jointly administered cases or was previously granted permission
to attend by the Mediation Team Leader as a result of a prior
request in the jointly administered cases.  The mediation team
leader will endeavor to permit attendance by all parties in
interest in PREPA's case who wish to attend, subject to space and
timing constraints.  The mediation team leader reserves the right
to approve or deny any request to attend the meeting, but if any
request is denied, the mediation team leader will discuss other
possible dates that she would be available to meet with any such
party.

Absent prior authorization by the mediation team leader, a maximum
of four individuals -- two attorneys, one financial advisor or
other consultant, and one client representative -- may attend the
meeting on behalf of each authorized party.  Attendance by a client
representative, to the extent feasible, is strongly encouraged.
Attendance by counsel is required.  Any request to exceed the
per-party maximum set forth shall be submitted in writing, and
include an explanation of the need for additional attendees. The
mediation team leader will review and respond to each such
request.

All individuals attending the meeting will abide by the terms of
Standing Order M10-468 (Revised) of the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York.

The meeting will proceed on a confidential basis, and will not be
open to the public or the media. Accordingly, and for security
reasons, each party must submit to the mediation team in writing,
not later than 12:00 p.m. noon (prevailing Eastern Time) on July
10, 2017, the names of all individuals attending the meeting on its
behalf.  Failure to comply with this requirement may result in
denial of entry into the meeting.

All requests or other written submissions relating to the July 12,
2017 meeting, including applications under Standing Order M10-468
(Revised) to bring personal electronic devices or general purpose
computing devices shall be sent to the mediation team's dedicated
law clerk, Matt Hindman, via email, at the following address:
hindmanDPR@ao.uscourts.gov.

                           About PREPA

The Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) --
http://www.prepa.com/-- is a public corporation and government
instrumentality of Puerto Rico.  PREPA supplies substantially all
the electricity consumed in the Commonwealth and owns all
transmission and distribution facilities and most of the generating
facilities that constitute Puerto Rico's electric power system.
Founded in 1941, PREPA supplies electricity to 1.5 million
consumers in Puerto Rico.  PREPA is the largest public utility in
the U.S. based on number of clients and revenue.

                         About Puerto Rico
                        and Title III Cases

Puerto Rico is a self-governing commonwealth in association with
the United States that's facing a massive bond debt of $70
billion, a 68% debt-to-GDP ratio and negative economic growth in
nine of the last 10 years.

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico has sought bankruptcy protection,
aiming to restructure its massive $74 billion debt-load and $49
billion in pension obligations.

The debt restructuring petition was filed by Puerto Rico's
financial oversight board in U.S. District Court in Puerto Rico
(Case No. 17-01578) on May 3, 2017, and was made under Title III
of 2016's U.S. Congressional rescue law known as the Puerto Rico
Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act ("PROMESA").

The Financial Oversight and Management Board later commenced Title
III cases for the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation
(COFINA) on May 5, 2017, and the Employees Retirement System (ERS)
and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (HTA) on
May 21.  On July 2, 2017, a Title III case was commenced for the
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority ("PREPA").

U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts has appointed U.S. District Judge
Laura Taylor Swain to oversee the Title III cases.  The Honorable
Judith Dein, a United States Magistrate Judge for the District of
Massachusetts, has been designated to preside over matters that
may be referred to her by Judge Swain, including discovery
disputes, and management of other pretrial proceedings.

Joint administration of the Title III cases, under Lead Case No.
17-3283, was granted on June 29, 2017.

The Oversight Board has hired as advisors, Proskauer Rose LLP and
O'Neill & Borges LLC as legal counsel, McKinsey & Co. as strategic
consultant, Citigroup Global Markets as municipal investment
banker, and Ernst & Young, as financial advisor.

Martin J. Bienenstock, Esq., Scott K. Rutsky, Esq., and Philip M.
Abelson, Esq., of Proskauer Rose; and Hermann D. Bauer, Esq., at
O'Neill & Borges are onboard as attorneys.

McKinsey & Co. is the Board's strategic consultant, Ernst & Young
is the Board's financial advisor, and Citigroup Global Markets
Inc. is the Board's municipal investment banker.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent. Prime Clerk
maintains a case web site at:

           https://cases.primeclerk.com/puertorico

Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC is the service agent for ERS, HTA,
and PREPA.

O'Melveny & Myers LLP is counsel to the Commonwealth's Puerto Rico
Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority (AAFAF), the agency
responsible for negotiations with bondholders.

The Oversight Board named Professor Nancy B. Rapoport as fee
examiner and to chair a committee to review professionals' fees.

                      Bondholders' Attorneys

Toro, Colon, Mullet, Rivera & Sifre, P.S.C. and Kramer Levin
Naftalis & Frankel LLP serve as counsel to the Mutual Fund Group,
comprised of mutual funds managed by Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.,
Franklin Advisers, Inc., and the First Puerto Rico Family of
Funds, which collectively hold over $3.5 billion in COFINA Bonds
and over $2.9 billion in other bonds issued by Puerto Rico and
other instrumentalities, including over $1.8 billion of Puerto
Rico general obligation bonds ("GO Bonds").

White & Case LLP and Lopez Sanchez & Pirillo LLC represent the UBS
Family of Funds and the Puerto Rico Family of Funds, which hold
$613.3 million in COFINA bonds.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Robbins, Russell,
Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, and Jimenez, Graffam &
Lausell are co-counsel to the ad hoc group of General Obligation
Bondholders, comprised of Aurelius Capital Management, LP,
Autonomy Capital (Jersey) LP, FCO Advisors LP, Franklin Mutual
Advisers LLC, Monarch Alternative Capital LP, Senator Investment
Group LP, and Stone Lion Capital Partners L.P.

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and Reichard & Escalera are
co-counsel to the ad hoc coalition of holders of senior bonds
issued by COFINA, comprised of at least 30 institutional holders,
including Canyon Capital Advisors LLC and Varde Investment
Partners, L.P.

Correa Acevedo & Abesada Law Offices, P.S.C., is counsel to Canyon
Capital Advisors, LLC, River Canyon Fund Management, LLC, Davidson
Kempner Capital Management LP, OZ Management, LP, and OZ
Management II LP (the QTCB Noteholder Group).

                            Committees

The U.S. Trustee formed a nine-member Official Committee of
Retirees and a seven-member Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors of the Commonwealth.  The Retiree Committee tapped
Jenner & Block LLP and Bennazar, Garcia & Milian, C.S.P., as its
attorneys.   The Creditors Committee tapped Paul Hastings  LLP and
O'Neill & Gilmore LLC as counsel.


PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC: To Keep $70M per Month Freepoint Fuel Deal
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority ("PREPA"), by and through
the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, as
PREPA's representative pursuant to PROMESA, filed with the U.S.
District Court for the District of Puerto Rico a motion to assume
the Fuel Oil Purchase Contract, dated as of July 31, 2015, with
Freepoint Commodities LLC.

PREPA uses Fuel Oil No. 6 -- i.e., heavy fuel oil referred to as
"F6" -- for the operation of PREPA's steam plants in Aguirre, Costa
Sur, San Juan, and Palo Saco.  In 2015, PREPA entered into the Fuel
Supply Contract with Freepoint for the supply of F6 pursuant to a
competitive RFP process.

Freepoint ships approximately $70 million worth of F6 to these
Power Plants each month.

Under the Fuel Supply Contract, PREPA is provided a $250 million
credit line with 42-day payment terms.  Further, Freepoint provides
PREPA an additional 30 days on the credit line, if PREPA submits
certain certifications in connection with each of Freepoint's fuel
deliveries; thereby extending PREPA's payment terms to 72 days from
delivery.  Freepoint may assign receivables to a receivables
assignee that is a beneficiary of the Fuel Supply Contract.
Generally, a certification attests to PREPA's financial condition
and warrants that PREPA will provide for payment of the Freepoint
fuel under its operating budget.

The Fuel Supply Contract was due to expire on October 31, 2017.
With the May 1, 2017 expiration of the PROMESA stay, and the
prospect of Title III and/or Title VI cases, PREPA felt it was
necessary to extend the Fuel Supply Contract beyond October 2017 to
provide additional certainty of supply to PREPA.  Freepoint was
willing to work with PREPA and agreed to extend the term of the
Fuel Supply Contract without any associated price increase
and to eliminate certain default and remedy provisions.  PREPA
thought the terms of the extension were reasonable.  As a result,
on April 10, 2017, PREPA and Freepoint entered into the third
amendment to the Fuel Supply Contract (the "2017 Amendment") that
extended the term of the Fuel Supply Contract through and including
October 31, 2018.

The 2017 Amendment further removed certain default provisions,
provided an alternative form of certification that contemplated a
potential title III case, and required PREPA to request the
assumption of the Fuel Supply Contract in the event of a title III
filing, as a first day filing, and obtain an order granting the
assumption request within forty days of the title III filing.

"The uninterrupted supply of F6 is critical to PREPA's operation of
the Power Plants.  PREPA will not be able to quickly find an
alternative fuel source to operate the Power Plants.  Thus, any
disruption to the F6 supply may ultimately shut down the Power
Plants.  This in turn, may leave Puerto Rican residents and
businesses without electricity," Martin J. Bienenstock, Esq., at
Proskauer Rose LLP, counsel to the Oversight Board, tells the
Court.

                           About PREPA

The Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) --
http://www.prepa.com/-- is a public corporation and government
instrumentality of Puerto Rico.  PREPA supplies substantially all
the electricity consumed in the Commonwealth and owns all
transmission and distribution facilities and most of the generating
facilities that constitute Puerto Rico's electric power system.
Founded in 1941, PREPA supplies electricity to 1.5 million
consumers in Puerto Rico.  PREPA is the largest public utility in
the U.S. based on number of clients and revenue.

                         About Puerto Rico
                        and Title III Cases

Puerto Rico is a self-governing commonwealth in association with
the United States that's facing a massive bond debt of $70
billion, a 68% debt-to-GDP ratio and negative economic growth in
nine of the last 10 years.

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico has sought bankruptcy protection,
aiming to restructure its massive $74 billion debt-load and $49
billion in pension obligations.

The debt restructuring petition was filed by Puerto Rico's
financial oversight board in U.S. District Court in Puerto Rico
(Case No. 17-01578) on May 3, 2017, and was made under Title III
of 2016's U.S. Congressional rescue law known as the Puerto Rico
Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act ("PROMESA").

The Financial Oversight and Management Board later commenced Title
III cases for the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation
(COFINA) on May 5, 2017, and the Employees Retirement System (ERS)
and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (HTA) on
May 21.  On July 2, 2017, a Title III case was commenced for the
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority ("PREPA").

U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts has appointed U.S. District Judge
Laura Taylor Swain to oversee the Title III cases.  The Honorable
Judith Dein, a United States Magistrate Judge for the District of
Massachusetts, has been designated to preside over matters that
may be referred to her by Judge Swain, including discovery
disputes, and management of other pretrial proceedings.

Joint administration of the Title III cases, under Lead Case No.
17-3283, was granted on June 29, 2017.

The Oversight Board has hired as advisors, Proskauer Rose LLP and
O'Neill & Borges LLC as legal counsel, McKinsey & Co. as strategic
consultant, Citigroup Global Markets as municipal investment
banker, and Ernst & Young, as financial advisor.

Martin J. Bienenstock, Esq., Scott K. Rutsky, Esq., and Philip M.
Abelson, Esq., of Proskauer Rose; and Hermann D. Bauer, Esq., at
O'Neill & Borges are onboard as attorneys.

McKinsey & Co. is the Board's strategic consultant, Ernst & Young
is the Board's financial advisor, and Citigroup Global Markets
Inc. is the Board's municipal investment banker.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent. Prime Clerk
maintains a case web site at:

           https://cases.primeclerk.com/puertorico

Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC is the service agent for ERS, HTA,
and PREPA.

O'Melveny & Myers LLP is counsel to the Commonwealth's Puerto Rico
Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority (AAFAF), the agency
responsible for negotiations with bondholders.

The Oversight Board named Professor Nancy B. Rapoport as fee
examiner and to chair a committee to review professionals' fees.

                      Bondholders' Attorneys

Toro, Colon, Mullet, Rivera & Sifre, P.S.C. and Kramer Levin
Naftalis & Frankel LLP serve as counsel to the Mutual Fund Group,
comprised of mutual funds managed by Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.,
Franklin Advisers, Inc., and the First Puerto Rico Family of
Funds, which collectively hold over $3.5 billion in COFINA Bonds
and over $2.9 billion in other bonds issued by Puerto Rico and
other instrumentalities, including over $1.8 billion of Puerto
Rico general obligation bonds ("GO Bonds").

White & Case LLP and Lopez Sanchez & Pirillo LLC represent the UBS
Family of Funds and the Puerto Rico Family of Funds, which hold
$613.3 million in COFINA bonds.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Robbins, Russell,
Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, and Jimenez, Graffam &
Lausell are co-counsel to the ad hoc group of General Obligation
Bondholders, comprised of Aurelius Capital Management, LP,
Autonomy Capital (Jersey) LP, FCO Advisors LP, Franklin Mutual
Advisers LLC, Monarch Alternative Capital LP, Senator Investment
Group LP, and Stone Lion Capital Partners L.P.

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and Reichard & Escalera are
co-counsel to the ad hoc coalition of holders of senior bonds
issued by COFINA, comprised of at least 30 institutional holders,
including Canyon Capital Advisors LLC and Varde Investment
Partners, L.P.

Correa Acevedo & Abesada Law Offices, P.S.C., is counsel to Canyon
Capital Advisors, LLC, River Canyon Fund Management, LLC, Davidson
Kempner Capital Management LP, OZ Management, LP, and OZ
Management II LP (the QTCB Noteholder Group).

                            Committees

The U.S. Trustee formed a nine-member Official Committee of
Retirees and a seven-member Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors of the Commonwealth.  The Retiree Committee tapped
Jenner & Block LLP and Bennazar, Garcia & Milian, C.S.P., as its
attorneys.   The Creditors Committee tapped Paul Hastings  LLP and
O'Neill & Gilmore LLC as counsel.


PUERTO RICO: Assured Guaranty Responds to PREPA Bankruptcy Filing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Assured Guaranty Ltd. (together with its subsidiaries, Assured
Guaranty) released the following comments regarding the approval of
the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority's (PREPA) Title III
bankruptcy filing by the Financial Oversight and Management Board
for Puerto Rico:

Dominic Frederico, President and Chief Executive Officer of Assured
Guaranty said, "As we indicated last week, the Oversight Board has
once again chosen to disregard the rule of law and a fundamental
purpose of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic
Stability Act (PROMESA) -- implementing consensual restructurings
that solve fiscal problems and allow Puerto Rico to regain access
to the capital markets.  The Restructuring Support Agreement (RSA)
would have provided: significant liquidity and debt relief, lower
rates for ratepayers, funds for capital improvements and access to
lower cost of capital.  By rejecting the RSA and approving a Title
III bankruptcy, the Oversight Board has shown that it has no
intention of seeking consensual resolutions and is instead
committed to reneging on as many of Puerto Rico's obligations to
stakeholders as possible.  This will lead to years of expensive and
time-consuming litigation.  We continue to believe the pre-existing
PREPA RSA, which was approved by two Puerto Rico governors, the
Puerto Rico Legislature, the Puerto Rico Energy Commission and the
PREPA Board, represents the best path forward for PREPA, the
Commonwealth and the residents of Puerto Rico.  We believe that it
is in the best interests of all parties involved that the Trump
Administration and US Congress step in and restore the rule of law
to avoid years of litigation and many wasted expenses for Puerto
Rico."

                          About PREPA

The Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) --
http://www.prepa.com/-- is a public corporation and government
instrumentality of Puerto Rico.  PREPA supplies substantially all
the electricity consumed in the Commonwealth and owns all
transmission and distribution facilities and most of the generating
facilities that constitute Puerto Rico's electric power system.
Founded in 1941, PREPA supplies electricity to 1.5 million
consumers in Puerto Rico.  PREPA is the largest public utility in
the U.S. based on number of clients and revenue.

                        About Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico is a self-governing commonwealth in association with
the United States that's facing a massive bond debt of $70 billion,
a 68% debt-to-GDP ratio and negative economic growth in
nine of the last 10 years.

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico has sought bankruptcy protection,
aiming to restructure its massive $74 billion debt-load and $49
billion in pension obligations.

The debt restructuring petition was filed by Puerto Rico's
financial oversight board in U.S. District Court in Puerto Rico
(Case No. 17-01578) on May 3, 2017, and was made under Title III
of 2016's U.S. Congressional rescue law known as the Puerto Rico
Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act ("PROMESA").

The Financial Oversight and Management Board later commenced Title
III cases for the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation
(COFINA) on May 5, 2017, and the Employees Retirement System (ERS)
and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (HTA) on
May 21.  On July 2, 2017, a Title III case was commenced for the
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority ("PREPA").

U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts has appointed U.S. District Judge
Laura Taylor Swain to oversee the Title III cases.  The Honorable
Judith Dein, a United States Magistrate Judge for the District of
Massachusetts, has been designated to preside over matters that may
be referred to her by Judge Swain, including discovery disputes,
and management of other pretrial proceedings.

Joint administration of the Title III cases, under Lead Case No.
17-3283, was granted on June 29, 2017.

The Oversight Board has hired as advisors, Proskauer Rose LLP and
O'Neill & Borges LLC as legal counsel, McKinsey & Co. as strategic
consultant, Citigroup Global Markets as municipal investment
banker, and Ernst & Young, as financial advisor.

Martin J. Bienenstock, Esq., Scott K. Rutsky, Esq., and Philip M.
Abelson, Esq., of Proskauer Rose; and Hermann D. Bauer, Esq., at
O'Neill & Borges are onboard as attorneys.

McKinsey & Co. is the Board's strategic consultant, Ernst & Young
is the Board's financial advisor, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
is the Board's municipal investment banker.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent. Prime Clerk
maintains a case web site at:

           https://cases.primeclerk.com/puertorico

Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC is the service agent for ERS, HTA,
and PREPA.

O'Melveny & Myers LLP is counsel to the Commonwealth's Puerto Rico
Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority (AAFAF), the agency
responsible for negotiations with bondholders.

The Oversight Board named Professor Nancy B. Rapoport as fee
examiner and to chair a committee to review professionals' fees.

                      Bondholders' Attorneys

Toro, Colon, Mullet, Rivera & Sifre, P.S.C. and Kramer Levin
Naftalis & Frankel LLP serve as counsel to the Mutual Fund Group,
comprised of mutual funds managed by Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.,
Franklin Advisers, Inc., and the First Puerto Rico Family of Funds,
which collectively hold over $3.5 billion in COFINA Bonds and over
$2.9 billion in other bonds issued by Puerto Rico and other
instrumentalities, including over $1.8 billion of Puerto Rico
general obligation bonds ("GO Bonds").

White & Case LLP and Lopez Sanchez & Pirillo LLC represent the UBS
Family of Funds and the Puerto Rico Family of Funds, which hold
$613.3 million in COFINA bonds.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Robbins, Russell,
Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, and Jimenez, Graffam &
Lausell are co-counsel to the ad hoc group of General Obligation
Bondholders, comprised of Aurelius Capital Management, LP, Autonomy
Capital (Jersey) LP, FCO Advisors LP, Franklin Mutual Advisers LLC,
Monarch Alternative Capital LP, Senator Investment Group LP, and
Stone Lion Capital Partners L.P.

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and Reichard & Escalera are
co-counsel to the ad hoc coalition of holders of senior bonds
issued by COFINA, comprised of at least 30 institutional holders,
including Canyon Capital Advisors LLC and Varde Investment
Partners, L.P.

Correa Acevedo & Abesada Law Offices, P.S.C., is counsel to Canyon
Capital Advisors, LLC, River Canyon Fund Management, LLC, Davidson
Kempner Capital Management LP, OZ Management, LP, and OZ
Management II LP (the QTCB Noteholder Group).

                            Committees

The U.S. Trustee formed a nine-member Official Committee of
Retirees and a seven-member Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors of the Commonwealth.  The Retiree Committee tapped Jenner
& Block LLP and Bennazar, Garcia & Milian, C.S.P., as its
attorneys.   The Creditors Committee tapped Paul Hastings  LLP and
O'Neill & Gilmore LLC as counsel.


PURPLE HEARTS: Files for Bankruptcy in Canada
---------------------------------------------
The bankruptcy of Purple Hearts Security Inc., located at 105 Judge
Road, Toronto, Canada, occurred on June 21, 2017, and the first
meeting of creditors will be held on July 10, 2016, at 11:00 a.m.,
at the Stay Inn, 560 Evans Avenue, Etobicoke, Ontario.

The Licensed Insolvency Trustee may be reached at:

   Charles Advisory Services Inc.
   Licensed Insolvency Trustee
   365 Evans Avenue, Suite 609
   Etobicoke, ON M8Z 1K2
   Tel: (416) 486-9660
   Fax: (416) 486-8024


QUEST PATENT: Post-Effective Amendment to 100M Shares Prospectus
----------------------------------------------------------------
Quest Patent Research Corporation filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission a post-effective amendment no. 1 to its Form
S-1 registration statement relating to the public offering of an
aggregate of 100,000,000 shares of common stock which may be sold
from time to time by Intelligent Partners, LLC, Andrew C. Fitton
and Michael Carper.

The shares offered by this prospectus may be sold by the selling
stockholders from time to time in the open market, through
privately negotiated transactions or a combination of these
methods, at a fixed price of $0.00[X] per share until the Company's
common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or the OTCQX or
OTCQB marketplaces of OTC Markets Group Inc., or is listed on a
securities exchange; and thereafter at market prices prevailing at
the time of sale or at negotiated prices.  The Company cannot
assure that its common stock will be quoted on the OTC Bulletin
Board or the OTCQX or OTCQB marketplaces or listed on a securities
exchange.

The Company will not receive any proceeds from the sale by the
selling stockholder of their shares of common stock.  The Company
will pay the cost of the preparation of this prospectus, which is
estimated at $15,000.

On June 29, 2017, the last reported sales price for the Company's
common stock on the OTC Pink, as reported by OTC Markets, was
$0.0012 per share.

A full-text copy of the Form S-1/A is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/HVqZYr

                     About Quest Patent

Quest Patent Research Corporation is an intellectual property asset
management company.  The Company's principal operations include the
development, acquisition, licensing and enforcement of intellectual
property rights that are either owned or controlled by the Company
or one of its wholly owned subsidiaries.  The Company currently
owns, control or manage eight intellectual property portfolios,
which principally consist of patent rights. The Company's eight
intellectual property portfolios include the three portfolios which
the Company acquired in October 2015 from Intellectual Ventures
Assets 16, LLC.

Quest Patent reported a net loss of $956,092 on $1.26 million
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared with a net loss
of $327,270 on $498,395 of revenue for the year ended Dec. 31,
2015.  As of March 31, 2017, Quest Patent had $2.08 million in
total assets, $3.68 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $1.59 million.

MaloneBailey, LLP issued a "going concern" qualification on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
citing that the Company has incurred a series of net losses
resulting in negative working capital as of Dec. 31, 2016.  These
conditions raise substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


QUEST RARE: Files Notice of Intention to Make BIA Proposal
----------------------------------------------------------
Quest Rare Minerals Ltd. on July 5, 2017, disclosed that it filed a
Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal ("Notice of Intention")
pursuant to the provisions of Part III of the Bankruptcy and
Insolvency Act (Canada) (the "BIA").

Pursuant to the Notice of Intention, PricewaterhouseCoopers (the
"PwC") has been appointed as the trustee in the Company's proposal
proceedings and will assist the Company in its restructuring
efforts.

This filing follows the Company's strategic review of its options
pursuant to the decision of a major industrial conglomerate with
interests in construction, mining and hydrocarbons not to follow
through at this present time with an investment in the Quest
project, as contemplated in the Memorandum of Understanding signed
on November 2, 2016.

The filing of the Notice of Intention has the effect of imposing an
automatic 30-day stay of proceedings that will protect the Company
and its assets from the claims of creditors while the Company
pursues its restructuring efforts.  This 30-day period may be
renewed with the authorization of the Superior Court of Quebec.

The Company believes that the action it has taken will be
beneficial to all stakeholders by giving the Company the time and
resources needed to find other sources of funding or take
opportunity to merge with or be acquired by another company.  There
can be no guarantee that the Company will be successful in securing
financing or achieving its restructuring objectives.  Failure by
the Company to achieve its financing and restructuring goals will
likely result in the Company becoming bankrupt.

The Company will provide further updates as to the next steps of
the process when these have been determined.

The Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) has indicated that trading in the
Company's securities will be suspended from trading.  The TSX will
put the Company under delisting review with respect to meeting the
continued listing requirements in accordance with the expedited
review process.  There is no certainty as to timing or likelihood
that the securities will recommence trading on the TSX.

Board of Directors

Quest is pleased to announce that Dr. Dirk Naumann, President and
CEO, has joined the Board of Directors of the Company.  Mr. Neil
Wiener resigned as a director for personal reasons.  The officers
and directors of Quest offer their sincere thanks to Mr. Wiener for
his unwavering support of the organization since 2007 and regret
having to accept his resignation.

Quest's New Coordinates

Effective July 1, 2017, the Company's offices are located at 1200
McGill College Avenue, Suite 1100, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3B
4G7, phone: 514 228-0377.

                           About Quest

Quest Rare Minerals Ltd. ("Quest") (TSX:QRM)  is a Canadian-based
company focused on becoming an integrated producer of rare earth
metal oxides and a significant participant in the rare earth
elements (REE) material supply chain.  Quest is led by a management
team with in-depth experience in chemical and metallurgical
processing.  Quest's objective is the establishment of major
hydrometallurgical and refining facilities in Becancour, Quebec, to
separate and produce strategically critical rare earth metal
oxides.  These industrial facilities will process mineral
concentrates extracted from Quest's Strange Lake mining properties
in northern Quebec and recycle lamp phosphors utilizing Quest's
efficient, eco-friendly "Selective Thermal Sulphation (STS)"1
process.


QUEST SOLUTION: Five Directors Elected by Shareholders
------------------------------------------------------
Question Solution, Inc., held its annual meeting of shareholders on
June 28, 2017, at which the Company's shareholders:

   (i) elected Thomas O. Miller, Shai S. Lustgarten, Andrew J.
       MacMillan, Neev Nissenson and Yaron Shalem as members
       of the Board of Directors of the Company to serve until the
       next annual meeting to be held in 2018 or until their
       successors have been duly elected and qualified;

  (ii) ratified the appointment of RBSM, LLP to serve as the
       Company's independent registered public accounting firm for
       fiscal year 2017;

(iii) approved, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of the
       Company's named executive officers; and

  (iv) approved a non-binding proposal as to the frequency with
       which stockholders will vote on the compensation of the
       Company's named executive officers in future years.

                      About Quest Solution

Quest Solution, formerly known as Amerigo Energy, Inc., is a
national mobility systems integrator with a focus on design,
delivery, deployment and support of fully integrated mobile
solutions.  The Company takes a consultative approach by offering
end to end solutions that include hardware, software,
communications and full lifecycle management services.  The highly
tenured team of professionals simplifies the integration process
and delivers proven problem solving solutions backed by numerous
customer references.  Motorola, Intermec, Honeywell, Panasonic,
AirWatch, Wavelink, SOTI and Zebra are major suppliers which Quest
Solution uses in its systems.

Quest Solution incurred a net loss attributable to stockholders of
$14.21 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, following a net
loss of $1.71 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  The
Company's balance sheet as of March 31, 2017, showed $27.78 million
in total assets, $42.95 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $15.16 million.

RBSM, LLP, issued a "going concern" qualification on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.
The auditors said the Company has a working capital deficiency and
significant subordinated debt resulting from acquisitions.  These
factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


ROMEO'S PIZZA: Seeks September 1 Plan Filing Exclusivity Extension
------------------------------------------------------------------
Romeo's Pizza Express, Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Florida its second motion seeking an
extension of the exclusivity period within which to file its plan
of reorganization and disclosure statement through and including
September 1, 2017.

Absent such extension, the exclusivity period within which the
Debtor is required to file its plan and disclosure statement was
slated to expire July 3, 2017. As such, the Debtor needs an
extension of the exclusivity period as it is still currently in
negotiations with secured creditors.

                   About Romeo's Pizza Express

Romeo's Pizza Express, Inc. filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case No. 16-24817) on Nov. 1, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Antonio Manglaviti, president and managing partner. The
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $500,001 to $1 million
at the time of the filing.

The Debtor is represented by Malinda L. Hayes, Esq., at Markarian
Frank White-Boyd & Hayes. The Debtor hired Siegel & Siegel, LLC to
serve as its accountant; and Auction America as appraiser.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


SCIO DIAMOND: Delays Filing of Fiscal 2017 Form 10-K
----------------------------------------------------
Scio Diamond Technology Corporation said that its annual report on

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, will not be
submitted by the deadline without unreasonable effort or expense.
The Company had unanticipated delays in the completion of the 10-K,
according to a Form 12b-25 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

                       About Scio Diamond

Scio Diamond Technology Corporation was incorporated under the laws
of the State of Nevada as Krossbow Holding Corp. on Sept. 17, 2009.
The Company's focus is on man-made diamond technology development
and commercialization.

Scio Diamond reported a net loss of $3.62 million on $616,758 of
revenue for the year ended March 31, 2016, compared to a net loss
of $4.14 million on $726,193 of revenue for the year ended March
31, 2015.

Cherry Bekaert LLP, in Greenville, South Carolina, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended March 31, 2016, citing that the Company has
generated limited revenue, incurred net losses and incurred
negative operating cash flows since inception and will require
additional financing to fund the continued development of products.
The availability of such financing cannot be assured.  These
conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as
a going concern.


SNEH AND SAHIL: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------
Sneh and Sahil Enterprises, Inc., seeks interim authorization from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois for
the use of the cash collateral, pending a final hearing.

The amounts the Debtor seeks immediately to use are limited to
those amounts that are necessary to preserve and maintain the value
of the Debtor's estate, and will be used in accordance with the
Budget.  The Debtor has prepared a monthly budget projecting
expenses in the aggregate sum of $81,334.

The Debtor and co-Debtor Spruha Shah, LLC, were indebted to MB
Financial Bank in the approximate amount of $900,859 plus
additional accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts owing to
MB Financial under the applicable loan documents, secured by a
perfected mortgage and security interest in substantially all of
the Debtor's assets.

The Debtor believes that the U.S. Small Business Association also
has such an interest that is subordinate to that of MB Financial.

The MB Financial and the SBA claims are cross-collateralized
between the Debtor and Spruha Shah, LLC. The Debtor asserts that
the overall property securing MB Financial's claims is valued at
approximately $2,900,000. Accordingly, the Debtor believes that
there is an approximate $1.3 million equity cushion inuring to the
benefit of the secured creditors of the two estate.

The Debtor asserts that unless funds are made immediately available
to it, the Debtor will not he able to continue the operation of its
business, and will accordingly suffer immediate and irreparable
harm to its estate because, it will not be able to (a) pay
non-deferrable, necessary and ongoing expenses associated with the
operation of the businesses, (b) sustain post-petition operations
at a level necessary to preserve the estate pending a final hearing
on the cash collateral issue, and (c) will be required to cease
operations entirely causing serious, if not fatal, damage to the
value of the Debtor's business as a going concern.

                    About Spruha Shah and
                          Sneh and Sahil

Spruha Shah listed its business as a Single Asset Real Estate (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B). It is the owner of the real
property commonly known as 500 S. Hicks Rd., Palatine, Illinois.

Sneh and Sahil -- http://www.arlingtonrental.com/-- does business
under two assumed names, as follows: (a) Arlington Rental, which is
in the business of the rental of party equipment and supplies, such
as tents, portable dance floors, tables chairs and other catering
needs, and (b) R Lederleitner Landscape, which is in the business
of performing landscaping services. Debtor operates from a
commercial property owned by related Debtor Spruha Shah.       

Spruha Shah, LLC and Sneh and Sahil Enterprises, Inc.
simultaneously filed a Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case
Nos. 17-18858 and 17-18861, respectively), on June 22, 2017. The
petitions were signed by Sanjay Shah, managing member. The Debtor
is represented by Timothy C. Culbertson, Esq. at the Law Offices of
Timothy C. Culbertson.

Hon. Deborah L. Thorne presides over Spruha Shah's Chapter 11 case
and Hon. Benjamin A. Goldgar presides over Sahil Enterprises'
case.

At the time of filing, the Debtors had estimated assets and
liabilities ranging between $1 million to $10 million.


SPRUHA SHAH: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral to Pay Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Spruha Shah, LLC, seeks interim authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois for the use
of the cash collateral, pending a final hearing.

The Debtor and co-Debtor Sneh and Sahil Enterprises, Inc., were
indebted to MB Financial Bank in the approximate amount of $900,859
plus additional accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts owing
to MB Financial under the applicable loan documents, secured by a
perfected mortgage and security interest in substantially all of
the Debtor's assets.

The Debtor believes that the U.S. Small Business Association also
has such an interest that is subordinate to that of MB Financial.
The SBA claims approximately $572,829.

The MB Financial and the SBA claims are cross-collateralized
between the Debtor and Sneh and Sahil Enterprises, Inc. The Debtor
asserts that the overall property securing MB’s claims is valued
at approximately $2,900,000. Accordingly, the Debtor believes that
there is an approximate $1.3 million equity cushion inuring to the
benefit of the secured creditors of the two estate.

The Debtor proposes to pay MB Financial and the SBA, as adequate
protection of its interest in the cash proceeds, as follows:

     * MB Financial - 1st Mortgage: $ 11,034
     * SBA - 2nd Mortgage: $ 4,965
     * MB Financial - 3rd Mortgage: $2,100

The Debtor asserts that unless funds are made immediately available
to the Debtor, it will not he able to continue the operation of its
business, and will accordingly suffer immediate and irreparable
harm to its estate because, it will not be able to (a) pay
non-deferrable, necessary and ongoing expenses associated with the
operation of the businesses, (b) sustain post-petition operations
at a level necessary to preserve the estate pending a final hearing
on the cash collateral issue, and (c) will be required to cease
operations entirely causing serious, if not fatal, damage to the
value of the Debtor's business as a going concern.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated June 29, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/ZqzQFZ

                      About Spruha Shah and
                          Sneh and Sahil

Spruha Shah listed its business as a Single Asset Real Estate (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B). It is the owner of the real
property commonly known as 500 S. Hicks Rd., Palatine, Illinois.

Sneh and Sahil -- http://www.arlingtonrental.com/-- does business
under two assumed names, as follows: (a) Arlington Rental, which is
in the business of the rental of party equipment and supplies, such
as tents, portable dance floors, tables chairs and other catering
needs, and (b) R Lederleitner Landscape, which is in the business
of performing landscaping services. Debtor operates from a
commercial property owned by related Debtor Spruha Shah.       

Spruha Shah, LLC and Sneh and Sahil Enterprises, Inc.
simultaneously filed a Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case
Nos. 17-18858 and 17-18861, respectively), on June 22, 2017. The
petitions were signed by Sanjay Shah, managing member. The Debtor
is represented by Timothy C. Culbertson, Esq. at the Law Offices of
Timothy C. Culbertson. At the time of filing, the Debtors had
estimated assets and liabilities ranging between $1 million to $10
million.

Hon. Deborah L. Thorne presides over Spruha Shah's Chapter 11 case
and Hon. Benjamin A. Goldgar presides over Sahil Enterprises'
case.

No official committee of unsecured creditors, trustee or examiner
has been appointed to serve in these Chapter 11 Cases.


STEMTECH INTERNATIONAL: Plan Filing Deadline Extended Until Aug. 16
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Raymond B. Ray of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida extended the exclusive periods within which
only Stemtech International, Inc. may file and solicit acceptances
of a plan through and including August 16, 2017 and October 16,
2017, respectively.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor asked the Court for an extension of its Exclusive Periods
saying that throughout this case, the Debtor and its
representatives have endeavored to fully cooperate with
representatives of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
and Opus Bank.  

The Debtor also said that, together with its representatives, it
has participated in weekly calls with Opus Bank, responded to
information requests from the Committee originally consisting of
approximately 40 separate requests, and responded to numerous
follow-up requests for information and other questions.

Stemtech also mentioned that, together with its representatives,
the Debtor met on two separate occasions with counsel for the
Committee in an effort to respond to any additional questions
raised by the Committee.

The Debtor claimed that it receives financial reporting from
subsidiaries, which is then reviewed and analyzed by the Debtor and
its representatives. This information will facilitate preparation
of financial projections which, in turn, will facilitate the
formulation of a plan. Given the fact that the Debtor is a holding
company for approximately 30 operating subsidiaries, the Debtor
alleged that more time will be needed within which to formulate a
plan.

The Debtor told the Court that, together with its representatives,
it has been engaged in cost cutting measures in an effort to
improve profitability.  In turn, this will enable the Debtor to
work towards formulating a plan of reorganization.  These cost
cutting efforts have included, but have not been limited to,
closing approximately 13 unprofitable subsidiaries and negotiations
with the Debtor's landlord in an effort to modify the Debtor's
leasehold interest.  These efforts and others should result in cost
reductions of approximately $100,000 per month.

                     About Stemtech International

Stemtech International, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-11380) on Feb. 2, 2017,
estimating $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities. The
petition was signed by Ray C. Carter, chief executive officer.

The Hon. Raymond B. Ray presides over the case.

The Debtor tapped SEESE, PA, as counsel; and GlassRatner Advisory &
Capital Group, LLC, as its financial advisor.

Guy Gebhardt, acting U.S. Trustee for Region 21, on Feb. 22
appointed three creditors of Stemtech International, Inc., to serve
on the official committee of unsecured creditors. The committee
members are (1) Wilhelm Keller; (2) Greg Newman; and (3) Andrew P.
Leonard.  The Committee retained Paul Steven Singerman, Esq. at
Berger Singerman LLP as counsel.


STUART AULD: 10th Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Chapter 11 Case
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirms the
District Court's March 27, 2015 Order affirming the Bankruptcy
Court's orders dismissing Stuart Auld's Chapter 11 bankruptcy case
and its related adversary proceeding.

In 2014, Stuart Auld appealed the dismissal of his Chapter 11
bankruptcy case and its related adversary proceeding to the
District Court. On March 26, 2015, the District Court affirmed the
Bankruptcy Court's orders dismissing both cases, and on March 27,
2015, it entered judgment to that effect.

More than four months later, on August 7, 2015, Auld filed a motion
seeking (1) additional findings of fact and conclusions of law; (2)
relief under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60; and (3) an
extension of time.

The District Court denied that motion on March 29, 2016, and Auld
filed a notice of appeal six days later, on April 4, 2016.

As a threshold matter, appellee Sun West Mortgage Company, Inc.
asks the Tenth Circuit to dismiss Auld's appeal for lack of
jurisdiction because Auld's April 4, 2016 notice of appeal is
untimely.

The Tenth Circuit disagrees wth Sun West's argument, explaining
that notice of appeal in a civil case must generally "be filed with
the district clerk within 30 days after entry of the judgment or
order appealed from." The Tenth Circuit notes that Auld filed his
April 4, 2016 notice of appeal within 30 days of the District
Court's March 29, 2016 order, and thus, to the extent, Auld's
notice of appeal is timely.

Alternatively, Sun West argues that Auld's notice of appeal must be
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because Auld's notice of appeal
doesn't satisfy Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 3(c),
asserting that Auld's notice of appeal fails to adequately
"designate the judgment, order, or part thereof being appealed."

The Tenth Circuit points out that "even if a notice fails to
properly designate the order from which the appeal is taken, the
Court has jurisdiction if the appellant's intention was clear." The
Tenth Circuit finds Auld's "intention" to appeal the District
Court's March 29, 2016 order is "clear," because the order is the
only order attached to his notice of appeal.

The Tenth Circuit also declines Sun West's assertion on Auld's
alleged failure to comply with Fed. R. App. P. 28(a), which
requires an appellant's brief to contain, "a statement of the
issues presented for review." The Tenth Circuit explains that even
assuming that Auld's brief fails to satisfy Rule 28's requirements,
the Court generally treat an appellant's failure to comply with
Rule 28 as a basis for affirming the District Court's judgment,
rather than as a basis for dismissing an appeal altogether.

Accordingly, the Tenth Circuit denies Sun West's motion to dismiss
and turn to the merits of Auld's appeal.

In denying Auld's August 7, 2015 motion, the District Court
reasoned that (1) it provided adequate findings of facts and
conclusions of law in its original order by incorporating those of
the bankruptcy court; (2) to the extent that Auld's motion
presented arguments and evidence, either the District Court had
already considered those arguments and that evidence or Auld had
failed to explain his failure to timely present those arguments and
that evidence; and (3) Auld didn't need an extension of time.

The Tenth Circuit largely affirms the District Court's March 29,
2016 order because Auld's opening brief fails to identify any
errors in the District Court's proffered bases for denying his
August 7, 2015 motion, Auld has waived any challenge to that
ruling.

Auld appears to assert that Sun West lacks constitutional standing,
thus depriving both the Bankruptcy Court and the District Court of
subject-matter jurisdiction over the underlying matters. But while
Auld purports to be arguing that Sun West lacks constitutional
standing, the Tenth Circuit finds that Auld is actually arguing
that Sun West lacks statutory standing because he asserts that Sun
West is not "the real party in interest."

The Tenth Circuit says that questions of statutory standing are not
jurisdictional, and therefore, may be waived through inadequate
briefing. Thus, the Tenth Circuit declines to consider Auld's
statutory-standing argument because Auld fails to provide any
citations to the record that might support his argument, thereby
waiving that argument.

Auld also asserts that the Bankruptcy Court lacked "constitutional
authority to enter a final order." The Tenth Circuit rejects this
argument and affirms the District Court's denial of Auld's August
7, 2015 motion because the Court finds no indication that the
Bankruptcy Court entered judgment in such a state-law action, but
on the contrary, the Bankruptcy Court repeatedly and explicitly
refused to re-litigate any underlying state-law questions.

The appeals case is STUART N. AULD, Appellant, v. SUN WEST MORTGAGE
COMPANY, INC., Appellee, Nos. 16-3069, 16-3071, (10th Cir.).

A full-text copy of the Order and Judgment dated June 28, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/HxTItl from Leagle.com.

                      About Stuart Auld

Stuart Auld filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No.
16-21695) on August 30, 2016, Pro Se.


T-REX OIL: To File Fiscal 2017 Form 10-K Within Extension Period
----------------------------------------------------------------
T-Rex Oil, Inc., was unable without unreasonable effort and expense
to prepare its accounting records and schedules in sufficient time
to allow its accountants to complete their review of its financial
statements for the year ended March 31, 2017, before the required
filing dated for the Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The Company
intends to file the subject Annual Report on Form 10-K on or before
the fifteenth calendar day following the prescribed due date.

                          About T-Rex

T-Rex Oil, Inc., f/k/a Rancher Energy Corp., is an energy company,
focused on the acquisition, exploration, development and production
of oil and natural gas.

T-Rex Oil reported a net loss of $15.70 million for the year ended
March 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $11.04 million for the
year ended March 31, 2015.

As of Dec. 31, 2016, T-Rex Oil had $3.17 million in total assets,
$4.01 million in total liabilities and a stockholders' deficit of
$842,385.

B F Borgers CPA PC, in Denver, CO, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2016, noting that the Company's significant
operating losses raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


TALEN ENERGY: S&P Lowers Unsec. Rating to B- & Rates 2024 Notes BB-
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it lowered its unsecured rating on Talen
Energy Supply to 'B-' from 'B'. S&P also revised the recovery
rating on the unsecured unguaranteed debt to '6' from '5',
reflecting its expectation of negligible (0%-10%; rounded estimate:
0%) recovery in the event of default.   

The recovery ratings of '1' and '2' on the secured and unsecured
guaranteed debt are unchanged. The '1' recovery rating indicates
our expectation for very high (90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%)
recovery in our simulated default scenario. The '2' recovery rating
reflects our expectation for substantial (70%-90%; rounded
estimate: 70%) recovery in S&P's simulated default scenario.

S&P said, "We also assigned a 'BB-' rating and recovery rating of
'2' to the proposed unsecured guaranteed notes due 2024."

S&P added, "The negative outlook reflects our expectation that
Talen's leverage will remain elevated in coming years as a
consequence of lower prices and a somewhat weakened capacity market
in the Pennsylvania-Jersey-Maryland (PJM) Interconnection, its key
market, as well as gas pricing that has weakened the profitability
of its nuclear asset.

"While we previously had expected leverage to rise slightly
following the close of the Riverstone transaction, weakened market
conditions have amplified the challenges. Energy prices have
continued to stay stubbornly low amid challenging demand
conditions, which we now believe will continue."

Further, the recent capacity auction results could be troubling for
Talen, more so than for other generators. Lower-than-anticipated
Regional Transmission Organization and MAAC capacity pricing (at
$77/MW-Day and $86/MW-Day respectively) disproportionately affects
Talen, while other generators benefitted from pricing separation
seen in areas like ComEd, PS-North, and EMAAC. While these large
pricing gaps may not persist in the early 2020s, they could lead to
cash flow weakness in years in which the issuer is already thought
to be vulnerable and during a time frame in which the issuer will
have to pursue refinancing.

The rating outlook on Talen Energy Supply LLC is negative. S&P
said, "Based on the current market conditions, we expect the
enterprise company to maintain adjusted debt to EBITDA to exceed
5.75x during 2017, but increasing weakness in power prices, driven
by lower gas prices and lower market heat rates, has contributed to
greater uncertainty about when this high leverage could abate.

S&P said, "We could lower the ratings if debt to EBITDA stays above
5.5x persistently or if free cash flow metrics continue to decline.
This would likely stem from some combination of softer energy
markets brought on by lower gas prices and less robust capacity
markets in PJM, as well weakened efficiency and availability at key
plants. Further, unforeseen debt issuances could contribute to this
effect.

"While not likely over the next two years, we could raise the
ratings if financial measures improve, such that debt to EBITDA
remains consistently below 5x. This would likely result from an
effort to reduce debt somewhat by the new ownership (perhaps
through substantial divestitures), as well as a more robust and
incentive-laden capacity market. Much like other portfolios in PJM,
much of the potential upside would stem from other generators
closing non-performing assets."


TIDEWATER INC: Objects to Further Adjournment of Plan Hearing
-------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Tidewater Inc. filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court an objection to (a) the official equity
committee's (OEC) emergency motion for a further adjournment of the
Disclosure Statement and Plan Confirmation hearing and (b) the
official equity committee's motion for expedited consideration of
same. The objection asserts "First, the OEC's request is a
transparent action to exert settlement leverage. The OEC requested
the first adjournment in order to have time to exercise its
fiduciary duties, determine whether it will be contesting the Plan,
and prepare for a contested confirmation hearing, if necessary....
Second, for the reasons discussed in the Debtors' objection to the
First Motion to Adjourn and below, the potential risk of harm to
the Debtors' business and estates far outweighs any rationale
offered by the OEC to extend the date for the Combined Hearing for
a second time. As the Court is aware, the Debtors conduct
significant (almost 90% of their) operations in foreign countries.
As a result, many of the Debtors' creditors and contract
counterparties do not transact business on a regular basis with
companies that have filed for chapter 11 protection and may not
understand the reach of the automatic stay. Moreover, many of the
Debtors' contracts are short term contracts. Changing course yet
again at this late stage in the Debtors' chapter 11 cases, and
after the only impaired class has voted overwhelmingly to accept
the Plan, may have serious unintended consequences to the Debtors,
their estates, their operations, and these cases. The Debtors
should not have to take on such a risk at the whim of the OEC."

                      About Tidewater Inc.

Founded in 1955, Tidewater, Inc. (NYSE: TDW) is a publicly traded
international petroleum service company headquartered in New
Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.  It operates a fleet of ships, providing
vessels and marine services to the offshore petroleum industry.

Tidewater Inc. and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11132) on May 17,
2017.
The petitions were signed by Bruce Lundstrom, executive vice
president, general counsel and secretary.

Tidewater, Inc. disclosed $4.31 billion in total assets and $2.34
billion in debt as of Dec. 31, 2016.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as counsel;
Richards,
Layton & Finger, P.A., as co-counsel; Jones Walker LLP, as
corporate counsel; AlixPartners, LLP, as financial advisors;
Lazard
Freres & Co. LLC, as investment banker; KPMG LLP, as restructuring
tax consultant; Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditor and tax
consultant; Ernst & Young as tax advisor; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as administrative advisors, and claims and
solicitation agent.

An unofficial committee of noteholders of Tidewater Inc., et al.,
has retained Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, as
restructuring counsel, and Blank Rome LLP, as maritime counsel in
connection with restructuring discussions.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, on June 20
appointed three creditors to serve on the committee of equity
security holders; and three creditors to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors.  Counsel to the Equity Committee
are Saul Ewing LLP and Brown Rudnick LLP.  Lawyers at Whiteford,
Taylor & Preston LLC represent the Unsecured Creditors Committee.


TRUE RELIGION: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: True Religion Apparel, Inc.
             1888 Rosecrans Ave.
             Manhattan Beach, CA 90266

Business Description: Founded in Los Angeles, California in 2002,
                      True Religion designs, markets, sells,
                      and distributes premium fashion apparel,
                      centered on its core denim products using
                      the brand name "True Religion Brand Jeans."
                      True Religion is a brand that is globally
                      recognized for innovative, trendsetting
                      denim jeans and apparel.  The Company's
                      products are distributed through wholesale
                      and retail channels on six continents and
                      through their websites at
                      www.truereligion.com and www.last-
                      stitch.com.  On a global basis, as of the
                      Petition Date, the Company had approximately
                      140 True Religion and Last Stitch retail
                      stores and over 1,900 employees.  For the
                      twelve months ended Jan. 28, 2017, the
                      Company generated $369.5 million of net
                      revenue and posted a net operating loss of
                      $78.5 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 5, 2017

Affiliated debtors that simultaneously filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions:

      Debtor                                      Case No.
      ------                                      --------
      True Religion Apparel, Inc.                 17-11460
      True Religion Intermediate Holdings, LLC    17-11461
      Guru Denim, Inc.                            17-11462
      True Religion Sales, LLC                    17-11463
      TRLGGC Services, LLC                        17-11464

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware (Delaware)

Judge: Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi

Debtors' Counsel:     Laura Davis Jones, Esq.
                      David M. Bertenthal, Esq.
                      James E. O'Neill, Esq.
                      PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
                      919 N. Market Street, 17th Floor
                      Wilmington, DE 19801
                      Tel: 302 652-4100
                      Fax: 302-652-4400
                      E-mail: ljones@pszjlaw.com
                              dbertenthal@pszjlaw.com
                              joneill@pszjlaw.com

Debtors'
Financial
Advisor:              MAEVA GROUP, LLC

Debtors'
Claims,
Noticing,
Solicitation
Agent &
Administrative
Advisor:              PRIME CLERK LLC
                      https://cases.primeclerk.com/TrueReligion

Ad Hoc Group of
First and Second
Lien Lenders'
Attorneys:            AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
                      Arik Preis, Esq.
                      Jason P. Rubin, Esq.
                      Yochun Katie Lee, Esq.
                      Bank of America Tower
                      One Bryant Park
                      New York, New York 10036
                      Telephone: (212) 872-1000
                      Facsimile: (212) 872-1002
                      E-mail: apreis@akingump.com
                              jrubin@akingump.com
                              kylee@akingump.com

                             - and -

                      ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A.
                      Karen B. Skomorucha Owens, Esq.
                      Stacy L. Newman, Esq.
                      500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
                      P.O. Box 1150
                      Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1150
                      Telephone: (302) 654-1888
                      Facsimile: (302) 654-2067
                      E-mail: kowens@ashby-geddes.com
                              snewman@ashby-geddes.com
Ad Hoc Group of
First and Second
Lien Lenders'
Financial Advisors:   MOELIS & COMPANY, LLP

Debtors'
Total Assets: $243.3 million as of Jan. 28, 2017

Debtors'
Total Liabilities: $534.7 million as of Jan. 28, 2017

The petitions were signed by Dalibor Snyder, chief financial
officer.  A full-text copy of True Religion Apparel's petition is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-11460.pdf

Debtors' List of 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
LYA Group                               Trade             $826,520
Attn: Claudia Blanco
1317 S Grand Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90015
Tel: 213-683-1123
Email: claudiab@lyagroup.com

OA S.A. De. C.V.                        Trade             $766,762
Attn: Jose Martinez
Zona Franca Internacional
Edif. 2 km 28.5 Carretera A
Comalapa Olocuilta
La Paz
El Salvador
Tel: 503-2304-9988
Fax: 503-2304-9933
Email: vidalm@oa2012.com

Excel Kind Industrial, Ltd              Trade             $394,383
Attn: Zama Pang
Flat B, 4/F, No. 2-4
Luk Hop St Sanpoxong
Kowloon, Hongkong
Tel: 86-755-26973530
Fax: 86-755-23505683
Email: zama.pang@excelkind.com

513 Broadway Realty, LLC              Landlord            $376,315
Attn: Alexandra Barnes  
Premiere Equities
150 East 58th St, 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10155
Tel: 212-421-3634
Fax: 212-421-3659
Email: alexandra@premierequities.com

North American Trading, LLC             Trade             $277,035
Attn: Lourdes Ramirez Natco
PO Box 894878
Los Angeles, CA 91489-4878
Tel: 213-596-8916
Fax: 407-290-1613
Email: lramirez@yasiro.com.mx

North American Trading, LLC
Attn: Lourdes Ramirez
827 Union Pacific Street
PMB 82 256
Laredo, TX 78045

Kennedy International Corp.             Trade             $269,327
Attn: Tim Kennedy
20934 S Santa Fe Ave
Carson, CA 90810
Tel: 800-225-4401
Fax: 323-269-7969
Email: Tim@califame.com

Guardian Life Insurance Co            Landlord            $197,246
of America
Email: dsmith@9realestate.com

Medallia, Inc.                          Trade             $193,711
Email: shenderson@medallia.com

Continental Rosecrans Aviation, LP    Landlord            $192,557

NorthBridge Chicago, LLC              Landlord            $128,680
Email: northbridgemallr@macerich.com

863 Broadway, LLC                     Landlord            $115,464
Email: krivera@investcoinc.com

Jamestown Premier Malibu Village, LP  Landlord            $106,977
Email: joshua.callahan@jamestownlp.com

Formula Three Group, LLC               Trade               $93,714
Email: sales@formulathreegroup.com

Simon Chelsea                         Landlord             $92,671

Roza 14W, LLC                         Landlord             $90,491
Email: mmaya@14wall.com

U.S. Customs                           Trade               $90,150

Town Center at Boca Raton Trust       Landlord             $84,928
Email: brent.tomb@simon.com

Rexford Industrial - Jurupa, LLC      Landlord             $84,137
Email: mzehner@ctrinvestors.com

CPG Partners, LP                      Landlord             $83,304

Eplus Group, Inc.                      Trade               $71,873
Email: sfedor@eplus.com

Ballet Valet, Corp.                   Landlord             $70,232
Email: jorge@goldmanproperties.com

Short Hills Associates, LLC           Landlord             $64,387
Email: npartee@taubman.com

1122 Third Avenue Associates, LLC     Landlord             $63,351
Email: jestein@related.com

CPG Partners, LP                      Landlord             $60,657

Jamestown 119 Newbury Street, LP      Landlord             $59,888
Email: tmirassou@irvinecompany.com

Forbes/Cohen Florida Properties, LP   Landlord             $58,176
Email: itemby@theforescompany.com

OS 4 Labor, LLC                        Trade               $58,173
Email: Amendoza@os4labor.com

Park Meadows Mall                     Landlord             $57,944
Email: felicia.ojo@generalgrowth.com

Purpose Driven Personnel, Inc.          Trade              $54,206
Email: tosbourne@pdpteam.com

Fashion Show Mall, LLC                Landlord             $53,919
Email: felicia.ojo@generalgrowth.com


TRUE RELIGION: Files for Chapter 11 with Plan to Cut Debt by $350M
------------------------------------------------------------------
Denim retailer True Religion Apparel, Inc., along with four
affiliates, sought Chapter 11 protection after signing a deal with
majority of its lenders, and equity sponsor, TowerBrook Capital
Partners, to support a plan of reorganization that would reduce
$493 million in funded debt by more than 70%.

On a global basis, as of the Petition Date, the True Religion Brand
Jeans retailer had approximately 140 True Religion and Last Stitch
retail stores and more than 1,900 employees.  For the 12 months
ended Jan. 28, 2017, the Company generated $369.5 million of net
revenue and posted a net operating loss of $78.5 million.

In recent years, the Company has closed 30 underperforming
locations worldwide and anticipate closing additional stores in
2017.

Dalibor Snyder, the CFO, explains that like several other national
retailers such as Quicksilver, Pacific Sunwear, American Apparel,
Aeropostale, and BCBG, to name a few, the Company has been
adversely affected by a macro consumer shift away from
brick-and-mortar to online retail channels, among other factors,
resulting in recent losses.  In addition, the premium denim market
segment of the fashion industry in which the Company operates has
been in decline over the last several years, compounding the
negative impact on the Company's sales.

Prepetition, the Company signed a restructuring support agreement
with parties that collectively hold approximately 86.4% of the
Debtors' prepetition first lien claims and 60.5% of the Debtors'
prepetition second lien claims, and by TRLG Holdings, LLC, the
parent company of debtor TRLG Intermediate Holdings, LLC.  The RSA
contemplates seeking approval of a Chapter 11 plan that will reduce
the 'Premium denim' retailer's debt by over $350 million and
convert it into the substantial majority of the reorganized
Company's equity.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors had outstanding funded debt
obligations in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $493
million, and related interest and accruals, consisting primarily of
(a) $12 million in principal amount outstanding under their
prepetition revolver; (b) $386 million in principal amount
outstanding under their prepetition first lien loan agreement; and
(c) $85 million in principal amount outstanding under their
prepetition second lien loan agreement. Additionally, as of July 3,
2017, the Debtors had an estimated $8.6 million of outstanding
accounts payable, and also owe additional amounts, on an unsecured
basis, to vendors, customers, service providers, and landlords.  

If the Plan is confirmed, the Debtors will emerge from the Chapter
11 cases with approximately 72% less funded debt.  The Debtors' pro
forma exit capital structure will consist of (a) a $25 million New
ABL Facility, to be provided by the same lenders that have agreed
to provide postpetition, senior secured debtor-in-possession
financing to the Debtors during the Chapter 11 Cases, (b) up to
$114.5 million in aggregate principal amount of reorganized first
lien term loans (less the amount of any Class 5 swapped debt, if
applicable).

The Company expects it will take 90 to 120 days to obtain
confirmation of its pre-arranged plan by the Bankruptcy Court.
Throughout the implementation of this process, True Religion will
continue to operate its business without interruption to customers,
employees and business partners.

"After a careful review, we are taking an important step to reduce
our debt, reinvigorate True Religion's iconic brand and position
the company for future growth and success," said John Ermatinger,
President and CEO of True Religion.  "By dramatically improving our
capital structure 24 months in advance of our term loan maturity,
we will continue business operations as usual and provide our
employees and business partners the long-term stability they need,
while providing the necessary flexibility to invest in growing our
digital footprint, building connections with customers, and
improving organizational competencies.  I want to recognize our
lender community, our private equity owner, TowerBrook Capital
Partners, and our financial and legal advisors for negotiating a
constructive outcome for the company. Importantly, I want to thank
our dedicated employees for remaining focused on the business, and
our loyal customers and valued business partners for their support
throughout this process."

Mr. Ermatinger continued, "I am also proud to announce that year to
date adjusted EBITDA through May at $7.1 million is up 95% versus
last year.  This improved performance will allow us to enter into
the next phase of our recapitalization process with confidence as
we continue to execute against our strategic plan and drive the
business forward."

True Religion has secured postpetition debtor-in-possession (DIP)
financing from Citizens Bank N.A. for up to $60 million.  Once True
Religion's plan is confirmed and the Company achieves the desired
deleveraging of its balance sheet under the Plan, True Religion
will have sufficient "exit" funding, also provided by Citizens Bank
N.A., in addition to its ongoing cash flow, to finance operations
post confirmation.

The Plan provides for full payment of claims of True Religion's
continuing trade creditors, which includes continuing vendors,
suppliers and landlords.  True Religion has taken additional steps
in order to ensure a smooth and orderly transition through the
Chapter 11 filing.  The Company has filed a motion to honor and pay
prepetition purchase orders that were issued prior to the petition
date, but which have not yet come due.  True Religion has also
filed a separate motion to pay certain vendor claims that arose
prior to the Petition Date, as well as to pay for goods received
within 20 days of the bankruptcy filing.

                           Milestones

The Restructuring Support Agreement obligates the Debtors to, among
other things, take all necessary action reasonably required to
propose and seek confirmation of the Plan.  Under both the
Restructuring Support Agreement and the DIP Facility, the Debtors
agreed to certain milestones designed to ensure that the Debtors
move expeditiously towards conformation of the Plan. Specifically,
the DIP Facility milestones include:

  * Interim DIP Order Approval: No later than 5 business days
following the Petition Date

  * Motion to Extend 365(d)(4): No later than 10 days after the
Petition Date.

  * Motion to Extend 365(d)(4): No later than 35 days after the
Petition Date.

  * Final DIP Order Approval: No later than 40 days following the
Petition Date.

  * Disclosure Statement Approval: No later than 65 days following
the Petition Date

  * Plan Confirmation of Acceptable Plan: No later than 100 days
following the Petition Date

  * Plan Consummation: The earlier of (i) 120 days following the
Petition Date or (ii) Oct. 30, 2017

A copy of the affidavit in support of the first-day pleadings is
available at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/True_Religion_3_1st_Day_Affidavit.pdf

                       About True Religion

Manhattan Beach-California-based True Religion Apparel Inc. designs
and markets denim, sportswear and accessories for men, women and
children under the "True Religion" brand.  Founded by Jeff Lubell
in 2002, the Company sells its products through wholesale and
retail channels on six continents and through their websites at
http://www.truereligon.com/and http://www.last-stitch.com/ As of
July 5, 2017, the True Religion Brand Jeans retailer had 140 True
Religion and Last Stitch brick-and-mortar stores.  

True Religion has been controlled by TowerBrook Capital Partners
since its take-private transaction in July 2013.

True Religion Apparel and four affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11460) on July 5, 2017,
after obtaining secured stakeholder support for a restructuring
that would reduce debt by over $350 million.

The Debtor had $243.3 million in assets against $534.7 million of
liabilities as of Jan. 28, 2017.

The company's legal advisors include Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz
and Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones.  The company's financial advisor
is MAEVA Group, LLC.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing
agent.

The Ad Hoc Group of Unaffiliated Prepetition First and Second Lien
Lenders -- who has signed the RSA -- tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer
& Feld LLP as counsel and Moelis & Company, LLP, as financial
advisor.


TRUE RELIGION: Key Vendors to Recover 100% of Claims
----------------------------------------------------
While unsecured creditors are slated to have a 4.9% to 7.5%
recovery under its prepackaged Chapter 11 plan, True Religion
Apparel's trade creditors classified as "critical vendors" will
recover 100 cents on the dollar.

True Religion Apparel and its debtor-affiliates have filed a motion
to pay certain prepetition claims of certain essential vendors and
service providers -- Critical Vendors -- in an amount not to exceed
$4,000,000.

Dalibor Snyder, the Company's chief financial officer, explains
that it is essential to the success of the Debtors' restructuring
effort that they be able to maintain the supply of merchandise to
their retail stores and via direct sales to their customers and
that they are able to continue to rely on service providers to
operate their business.  Failure to continue sourcing and managing
inventory and sales through their existing network of vendors and
service providers on commercially reasonable terms could have
catastrophic consequences for the Debtors.

The Debtors undertook a process to identify the Critical Vendors
using the following criteria: (i) whether a vendor is a sole-source
or primary provider of services or products; (ii) whether certain
customizations, specifications, or volume requirements prevent the
Debtors from obtaining a vendor's goods or services from
alternative sources within a reasonable timeframe; and (iii) if a
vendor is not a sole-source or primary provider of services or
products, whether the Debtors can continue to operate in the
ordinary course while a replacement vendor is secured.

The Critical Vendors do not operate under formal contracts with the
Debtors.  Instead, the Critical Vendors rely on prompt and full
payment.  Absent assurance of immediate payment either in part or
in whole, the Critical Vendors could refuse to deliver goods or
services to the Debtors.

The Debtors propose to condition the payment of the Critical Vendor
Claims upon the Critical Vendors' agreement to continue -- or
recommence supplying goods and services to the Debtors in
accordance with trade terms at least as favorable as those
practices and programs -- including credit limits, pricing, timing
of payments, availability, and other terms -- in place 12 months
prior to the Petition Date, or such other trade terms that are
acceptable to the Debtors in their discretion.

                       About True Religion

Manhattan Beach, California-based True Religion Apparel Inc.
designs and markets denim, sportswear and accessories for men,
women and children under the "True Religion" brand.  Founded by
Jeff Lubell in 2002, the Company sells its products through
wholesale and retail channels on six continents and through their
websites at http://www.truereligon.com/and
http://www.last-stitch.com/ As of July 5, 2017, the True Religion
Brand Jeans retailer had 140 True Religion and Last Stitch
brick-and-mortar stores.  

True Religion has been controlled by TowerBrook Capital Partners
since its take-private transaction in July 2013.

True Religion Apparel and four affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11460) on July 5, 2017,
after obtaining secured stakeholder support for a restructuring
that would reduce debt by more than $350 million.

The Debtor had $243.3 million in assets against $534.7 million of
liabilities as of Jan. 28, 2017.

The company's legal advisors include Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz
and Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones.  The company's financial advisor
is MAEVA Group, LLC.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing
agent.

The Ad Hoc Group of Unaffiliated Prepetition First and Second Lien
Lenders -- who has signed the RSA -- tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer
& Feld LLP as counsel and Moelis & Company, LLP, as financial
advisor.


TRUE RELIGION: Plans to Expand Pop-Up Outlet, Last Stitch Stores
----------------------------------------------------------------
True Religion Apparel, Inc., said in a court filing that in recent
years, it has closed 30 underperforming locations worldwide and
anticipates closing additional locations in 2017.

The Debtors have been engaged in landlord discussions either for
re-negotiation of terms or a consensual termination of various
leases; and expect that these discussions will continue
postpetition.

Aside from seeking confirmation of restructuring plan that would
reduce debt by more than $350 million, the Debtors will also
utilize the benefits of a chapter 11 case to continue to critically
evaluate their lease portfolio, close or consolidate
underperforming store locations, and renegotiate lease terms to the
extent possible.

While it is closing underperforming locations, the Company has
plans to expand its pop-up outlet stores and expand the Last Stitch
retail stores concept.

"The pop-up outlets have been profitable for the Debtors, require
significantly less outlay of capital than traditional outlet stores
to open, and are based on short-term leases (18 months or less)
with little downside for the Company.  The pop-up outlets enable
the Debtors to also reinforce their brand in targeted locations
near their key customer base without the capital outlay of opening
a traditional outlet store.  During the course of these cases, the
Debtors intend to open three to four additional pop-up outlets
consistent with their past practices and their go-forward business
plan.  In addition, the Debtors have had success with converting
certain of their True Religion locations to "Last Stitch" branded
locations.  During the course of these cases, the Debtors intend to
open two additional Last Stitch locations consistent with their
past practices," Dalibor Snyder, the Company's CFO, said in a court
filing.

As of the bankruptcy filing, the True Religion Brand Jeans retailer
has 128 retail stores in the U.S. and Canada, comprised of 73 True
Religion full-price stores, 53 True Religion outlet stores, and 2
Last Stitch retail stores, located in 33 states.  The Company also
has 11 international stores outside of North America, of which 6
are True Religion full-price retail stores and 5 are True Religion
international outlet stores.  The average full-price store is
typically 1,700 square feet and showcases the full range of True
Religion branded merchandise.  The outlet stores are typically
2,500 square feet.

                       About True Religion

Manhattan Beach, California-based True Religion Apparel Inc.
designs and markets denim, sportswear and accessories for men,
women and children under the "True Religion" brand.  Founded by
Jeff Lubell in 2002, the Company sells its products through
wholesale and retail channels on six continents and through their
websites at http://www.truereligon.com/and
http://www.last-stitch.com/ As of July 5, 2017, the True Religion
Brand Jeans retailer had 140 True Religion and Last Stitch
brick-and-mortar stores.  

True Religion has been controlled by TowerBrook Capital Partners
since its take-private transaction in July 2013.

True Religion Apparel and four affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11460) on July 5, 2017,
after obtaining secured stakeholder support for a restructuring
that would reduce debt by more than $350 million.

The Debtor had $243.3 million in assets against $534.7 million of
liabilities as of Jan. 28, 2017.

The company's legal advisors include Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz;
and Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones.  The company's financial advisor
is MAEVA Group, LLC.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing
agent.

The Ad Hoc Group of Unaffiliated Prepetition First and Second Lien
Lenders -- which has signed the RSA -- tapped Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld LLP as counsel and Moelis & Company, LLP, as financial
advisor.


TRUE RELIGION: Unsec. Creditors to Recover 4.9% to 7.5% Under Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
True Religion Apparel and its debtor-affiliates have filed a Joint
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization that provides that general
unsecured creditors owed $104.7 million will receive a $2.5 million
in first lien term loans and 5.5% of the stock in the reorganized
debtors, and, if the class votes in favor of the Plan, they will
receive $1 million in cash and an additional $2 million in
reorganized first lien term loans.

The Plan will convert $386 million of first lien claims to most of
the new equity of the reorganized debtors and new first lien term
loans.  Pursuant to a Restructuring Support Agreement, funds
holding 86.4% of the Debtors' prepetition first lien claims and
60.5% of the Debtors' prepetition second lien claims have agreed to
support the Debtors' Chapter 11 Plan.

The estimated recoveries under the Plan are:

             Type of
  Class  Claim or Interest   Claim Amount  Impaired?  Recovery
  -----  -----------------   ------------  ---------  --------
   1     Non-Tax Priority    $1 million to    No       100%
         Claims              $2 million    

   2     Miscellaneous       Less than        No       100%
         Secured Claims      $1 million

   3     Prepetition First   $392 million     Yes      37.2%  
         Lien Claims                                   to 38.2%

   4     Continuing          $3 million to    No       100%
         Operations          $5 million
         Claims    

   5     General Unsecured   $104.7 million   Yes      4.9%
         Claims                                        to 7.5%

   6     Equity Interests          N/A        Yes      N/A
         in Holdings         
  
   7     Intercompany              N/A        No       100%
         Interests

The Plan treats claims and interests:

   * FIRST LIEN CLAIMS.  Holders of First Lien Claims will receive
(i) Reorganized First Lien Term Loans in the aggregate principal
amount of $110 million under the Reorganized First Lien Term Loan
Facility; and (ii)(x) if first lien claimants (Class 3), general
unsecured creditors (Class 5), equity holders (Class 6) vote to
accept the Plan, the number of Exchange Common Shares equal to
90.0% of the maximum number of Exchange Common Shares distributable
under the Plan (prior to taking into account any exercise of the
Class 5 Equity Cash Out Option) or (y) if either of Class 5 or
Class 6 votes to reject the Plan, the number of Exchange Common
Shares equal to 94.5% of the Exchange Common Shares.

   * CONTINUING OPERATION CLAIMS.  Each Holder of allowed
continuing operations claims, i.e., claims of continuing vendors,
suppliers and landlords, will receive in full satisfaction,
settlement, discharge and release of, and partially in exchange
for, its Allowed Continuing Operations Claim: (i) Cash or such
other consideration due under the applicable Allowed Class 4 Claim
equal to the amount of such Allowed Class 4 Claim.

   * GENERAL UNSECURED CLAIMS.  Each Holder of an Allowed General
Unsecured Claim will receive, in full satisfaction, settlement,
discharge and release of, and in exchange for, such Allowed General
Unsecured Claim, its Pro Rata share of the Class 5 Default
Consideration, consisting of: (i) Reorganized First Lien Term Loans
in the aggregate principal amount of $2.5 million under the
Reorganized First Lien Term Loan Facility; (ii) the number of
Exchange Common Shares equal to 5.5% of the maximum number of
Exchange Common Shares distributable under the Plan; and (iii)
Class A Warrants.  In addition and only if Class 5 votes to accept
the Plan, each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim also
will receive, in full satisfaction, settlement, discharge and
release of, and in exchange for, such Allowed General Unsecured
Claim, its Pro Rata share of the Class 5 Consensual Plan
Consideration, consisting of: (i) $1.0 million in Cash; (ii)
additional Reorganized First Lien Term Loans in the aggregate
principal amount of $2.0 million under the Reorganized First Lien
Term Loan Facility; provided, however, if any Holder of an Allowed
General Unsecured Claim is a Class 5 Electing Holder, such Holder
will receive the Class 5 Warrants for Debt Treatment with respect
to its Class 5 Swapped Debt; and (iii) the Class 5 Equity Cash Out
Option, which, as more fully set forth in the Plan definition
thereof, is an option permitting each Holder of an Allowed General
Unsecured Claim to elect to receive, in lieu of the Exchange Common
Shares afforded it as part of the Class 5 Default Consideration, a
share of $1,050,000 in Cash.

* EQUITY INTERESTS IN HOLDINGS.  On the Effective Date, and solely
to the extent that each of Class 3, Class 5 and Class 6 vote to
accept the Plan, each Holder of an Equity Interest in TRLG
Intermediate Holdings, LLC, will receive, in full satisfaction,
settlement, discharge and release of, and in exchange for, such
Equity Interest in Holdings, its Pro Rata share of: (i) the number
of Exchange Common Shares equal to 4.5% of the maximum number of
Exchange Common Shares distributable under the Plan (prior to
taking into account any exercise of the Class 5 Equity Cash Out
Option) (to the extent any Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured
Claim exercises the Class 5 Equity Cash Out Option, the percentage
of New Common Shares received by Holders of Allowed Class 3 and
Class 6 Claims will automatically adjust on a Pro Rata basis to
reflect such exercise without the need to issue any additional New
Common Shares); (ii) Class B Warrants; and (iii) Class C Warrants.
If any of Class 3, Class 5 or Class 6 votes to reject the Plan,
Holders of Equity Interests in Holdings will receive no recovery,
and (x) the 4.5% of the Exchange Common Shares, will be distributed
Pro Rata to the Holders of Class 3 Prepetition First Lien Claims,
as set forth in the Plan and (y) the Class B Warrants and Class C
Warrants will not be issued.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/True_Religion_18_DS.pdf

                       About True Religion

Manhattan Beach, California-based True Religion Apparel Inc.
designs and markets denim, sportswear and accessories for men,
women and children under the "True Religion" brand.  Founded by
Jeff Lubell in 2002, the Company sells its products through
wholesale and retail channels on six continents and through their
websites at http://www.truereligon.com/and
http://www.last-stitch.com/ As of July 5, 2017, the True Religion
Brand Jeans retailer had 140 True Religion and Last Stitch
brick-and-mortar stores.  

True Religion has been controlled by TowerBrook Capital Partners
since its take-private transaction in July 2013.

True Religion Apparel and four affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11460) on July 5, 2017,
after obtaining secured stakeholder support for a restructuring
that would reduce debt by over $350 million.

The Debtor had $243.3 million in assets against $534.7 million of
liabilities as of Jan. 28, 2017.

The company's legal advisors include Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz
and Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones.  The company's financial advisor
is MAEVA Group, LLC.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing
agent.

The Ad Hoc Group of Unaffiliated Prepetition First and Second Lien
Lenders -- which signed the RSA -- tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &
Feld LLP as counsel and Moelis & Company, LLP, as financial
advisor.


UNITY COURIER: Needs More Time to Reconcile Claims, File Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
Unity Courier Service, Inc. requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California to extend the exclusive periods
to file a Chapter 11 plan and obtain acceptances of such plan for
an additional 90 days, to and including October 27 and December 27,
2017, respectively.

The Debtor notes that this is its initial request for extension of
the exclusivity periods.  Absent an extension, the Debtor's
exclusive periods to file a Plan and obtain acceptances thereof
will expire on July 29 and September 27, 2017, respectively.

However, the claims bar date of June 29, 2017 has just passed with
more than $97,000,000 in filed claims, significantly more than the
amount of debt scheduled by the Debtor.  The Debtor requires
additional time to carefully analyze the amount, validity, and
extent of the claims asserted against it which will need to be
addressed in the Plan.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has made every effort to
administer its case as effectively as possible.  The Debtor,
through its counsel, has spent the initial period of this chapter
11 case by promptly initiating communications with bankruptcy
counsel to the Brooks Class Claimants.  The Debtor represents that
the initial discussions with counsel to the Brooks Class Claimants
have been productive.

Brooks Class Claimants are the creditors whose judgment in the
amount of $5,128,705 was a precipitating cause of the Debtor's
chapter 11 petition and, prior to the filing of Claim Nos. 26 and
31, represented more than 80% of the dollar amount of all scheduled
and filed claims in this case.

Additionally, the Debtor tells the Court that some of the claims
relating to wage and hour litigation appear to overlap.  For
instance, on June 29, 2017, Claim No. 31 was filed by Tim Callejo,
Private Attorneys General Act Representative for Unity Employees in
the amount of $6,080,042.  In addition, on June 22,  Class
Representative Pedro Polio on behalf of himself and the Unity class
members filed Claim No. 26 in the amount of $82,867,986. The
Debtor, therefore, needs time to reconcile these claims, if
possible, and assess what it can propose as a consensual plan or in
the alternative, a "cram down" plan if necessary.

Moreover, the Debtor has continued its discussions with certain key
creditors about attempting to reach a consensual outcome in the
chapter 11 case, but the Debtor is not yet ready to propose a Plan.


A hearing on the Debtor's Motion for Extension will be held on July
26, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

                    About Unity Courier Service

Unity Courier Service, Inc., is a courier services provider. It
delivers individually addressed letters, parcels, and packages to
customers in the United States.

Unity Courier Service sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 17-13943) on March 31, 2017, estimating assets and
liabilities in the range of $1 million to $10 million.  The
petition was signed by Larry Lum, president.

Judge Ernest M. Robles is assigned to the case.

The Debtor employed Ira Benjamin Katz, a professional corporation,
and the Law Offices of David W. Meadows as general bankruptcy
counsel.


VERISIGN INC: S&P Assigns BB+ Rating on $450MM Sr. Unsec. Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it assigned its 'BB+' issue rating, with a
recovery rating of '3', to Reston, Va.-based VeriSign Inc.'s
proposed $450 million senior unsecured  notes. The '3' recovery
rating indicates S&P's expectation for meaningful (50% to 70%;
rounded estimate: 65%) recovery of principal in the event of a
default. Verisign will use the proceeds from the transaction for
general corporate purposes. The 'BB+' corporate credit rating on
the company and the 'BB+' issue-level rating on the existing notes
remain unchanged.  The outlook remains stable.

S&P's view of Verisign's financial risk profile reflects S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage in the high 3x area following the
proposed debt issuance. The leverage is in line with leverage
following the previous unsecured notes issuance in 2015. Verisign
has a stable recurring revenue business, and S&P projects the
company to generate free cash flow of about $600 million over the
next 12 months. Verisign has used all of its free cash flow on
share repurchases over the past three years, and S&P projects the
company to follow a similar share buyback strategy over the next 12
months.

S&P maintains its view of Verisign's liquidity as 'strong',
reflecting its expectation that the company will maintain a sizable
surplus cash position. Cash and short-term investments will be
around $2.23 billion following the issuance of the unsecured notes.
The company also has full availability under its $200 million
revolving credit facility.

RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Based on the current capital structure, a payment default for
Verisign is highly unlikely. Nonetheless, S&P's simulated default
scenario contemplates a default in 2022, primarily due to
operational missteps by the company or failed acquisitions that put
pressure on the company's liquidity. S&P assumes a reorganization
following the default, using an emergence EBITDA multiple of 7.5x
to value the company.

Simulated Default Assumptions
Simulated year of default: 2022
EBITDA at emergence: $202 million
EBITDA multiple: 7.5x
Simplified Waterfall
Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): $1.44
billion
Senior unsecured debt and pari passu claims: $1.96 billion
-- Recovery expectations: 50% to 70% cap*

Note: All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.

*Recovery ratings on unsecured debt issued by companies rated
'BB-' or higher are generally capped at '3' to account for the
greater risk of recovery prospects being impaired due to
incremental debt issuance prior to default.


WALTER INVESTMENT: Integrated Core & ICS Own 4.9% Stake at June 30
------------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Integrated Core, et al., disclosed that as of June 30,
2017, they beneficially owned an aggregate of 2,049,042 shares or
5.6% of Walter Investment Management Corp.'s common stock
outstanding as of June 23, 2017.

However, as of the close of business on June 30, 2017, Integrated
Core Strategies (US) LLC, beneficially owned 1,689,900 shares of
the Issuer's Common Stock and ICS Opportunities, Ltd.,
beneficially owned 112,654 shares of the Issuer's Common Stock,
which collectively represented 1,802,554 shares or 4.9% of the
Issuer's Common Stock outstanding.

Millennium International Management LP, a Delaware limited
partnership, is the investment manager to ICS Opportunities and may
be deemed to have shared voting control and investment discretion
over securities owned by ICS Opportunities.

Millennium International Management GP LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, is the general partner of Millennium
International Management and may also be deemed to have shared
voting control and investment discretion over securities owned by
ICS Opportunities.

Millennium Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, is
the general partner of the managing member of Integrated Core
Strategies and may be deemed to have shared voting control and
investment discretion over securities owned by Integrated Core
Strategies.  Millennium Management is also the general partner of
the 100% shareholder of ICS Opportunities and may be deemed to have
shared voting control and investment discretion over securities
owned by ICS Opportunities.

Israel A. Englander, a United States citizen, is the managing
member of Millennium International Management GP and Millennium
Management and may also be deemed to have shared voting control and
investment discretion over securities owned by Integrated Core
Strategies and ICS Opportunities.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                     https://is.gd/P3AcD3

                    About Walter Investment

Walter Investment Management Corp. and its subsidiaries --
http://www.walterinvestment.com/-- is an independent servicer and
originator of mortgage loans and servicer of reverse mortgage
loans.  The Company services a wide array of loans across
the credit spectrum for its own portfolio and for GSEs, government
agencies, third-party securitization trusts and other credit
owners.  Through the consumer, correspondent and wholesale lending
channels, the Company originates and purchases residential mortgage
loans that are predominantly sold to GSEs and government agencies.
The Company also operates two supplementary businesses; asset
receivables management and real estate owned property management
and disposition.

As of March 31, 2017, Walter Investment had $16.19 billion in total
assets, $15.91 billion in total liabilities and $282.97 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Walter Investment reported a net loss of $529.15 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $263.19 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on March 22, 2017, S&P Global Ratings said
it lowered its long-term issuer credit rating on Walter Investment
Management Corp. to 'CCC' from 'B'.  The outlook is negative.  At
the same time, S&P also lowered the rating on the company's senior
secured term loan to 'CCC' from 'B' and the rating on its senior
unsecured notes to 'CC' from 'CCC+'.

The TCR reported on June 9, 2017, that Moody's Investors Service
downgraded its long-term corporate family rating on Walter
Investment Management Corp. to to Caa2 from Caa1.  The rating
action is due to the growing risk of a debt restructuring that
Moody's believes is presented by the company's depleted capital,
which is due to its continued losses.


WORDSWORTH ACADEMY: July 13 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on July 13, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of Wordsworth Academy.

The meeting will be held at:

                 Office of the United States trustee
                 833 Chestnut Street, Suite 501
                 Philadelphia, PA 19107

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

                        About Wordsworth Academy

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-based Wordsworth Academy is a non-profit
that provides education, behavioral health and child welfare
services to children and youth who have emotional, behavioral and
academic challenges.  Wordsworth provides services through two
Community Umbrella Agencies.  CUA 5 provides services to children
and families in the 35th and 39th Police Districts in Philadelphia,
encompassing much of North Central Philadelphia.  CUA 10 provides
services to children and families in the 16th and 19th Police
Districts in Philadelphia, encompassing much of West Philadelphia.

Wordsworth Academy, along with Wordsworth CUA 5, LLC, and
Wordsworth CUA 10, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.
Pa. Lead Case No. 17-14463) on June 30, 2017.  Donald Stewart, the
CFO, signed the petitions.

Wordsworth Academy estimated assets and debt of $10 million to $50
million.

The Hon. Ashely M. Chan is the case judge.

Dilworth Paxson LLP is serving as counsel to the Debtors, with the
engagement led by Lawrence G. McMichael, Esq., Peter C. Hughes,
Esq., and Anne M. Aaronson, Esq. Getzler Henrich & Associates LLC
serves as financial advisor, and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc.,
serves as claims and noticing agent.


WPACES: S&P Lowers Rating on 2011 Revenue Bonds to BB
-----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its rating to 'BB' from 'BB+' on
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, Pa.'s  series
2011 revenue bonds issued for West Philadelphia Achievement Charter
Elementary School (WPACES). The outlook is stable.

"We lowered the rating on our view of weakness in management and
governance as evidenced by the significant delay in the 2016 audit
and multiple changes in financial management firms over a short
amount of time," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Robert Tu.
"As the 2016 audit is not currently available, our analysis is
based on the draft financials, which as we understand are similar
to the audited figures. Nevertheless, we view this as a risk due to
the lack of timeliness and comparability. We understand the
inability of the school to provide annual audited information is
not an event of default under the bonds, although bondholders may
have the right to bring action to compel performance by the
school," Mr. Tu added.

S&P said, "Additionally, we understand that the school has been
offered a five-year charter renewal with the School District of
Philadelphia (SDP), although it currently has not signed the
agreement due to an enrollment cap provision. This is similar to
2011, when the school refused to sign the charter initially when it
was offered. While no current agreement is in place, the school
expects this to be resolved in the near future. We would view the
signing of the charter as a reduced credit risk."

WPACES, founded in 1999, is an open-enrollment kindergarten through
fifth grade charter school in West Philadelphia that currently
serves 700 students. The school focuses on arts and technology and
incorporates these themes within academic disciplines.


[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings
-------------------------------------------------------
In re Peter G. Kudrave
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-17577
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         represented by: David A. Tilem, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A TILEM
                         E-mail: davidtilem@tilemlaw.com

In re Donald A. Latella
   Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 17-50718
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         Filed Pro Se

In re Jaime Palacios
   Bankr. D.D.C. Case No. 17-00353
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         Filed Pro Se

In re Samir Hammoud
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-04101
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         Filed Pro Se

In re Premsagar Mulkanoor
   Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 17-18799
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         represented by: Ariel Weissberg, Esq.
                         WEISSBERG & ASSOCIATES, LTD
                         E-mail: ariel@weissberglaw.com

In re James Richard Unger
   Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-18456
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         represented by: Aryeh E. Stein, Esq.
                         MERIDIAN LAW, LLC
                         E-mail: astein@meridianlawfirm.com

In re Mark R. Damstra
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 17-22723
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         represented by: Bruce H. Levitt, Esq.
                         LEVITT & SLAFKES, P.C.
                         E-mail: blevitt@levittslafkes.com

In re Feiyang Group LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-43218
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb17-43218.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Benjamin Jack Douek
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-22974
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         represented by: Robert Leslie Rattet, Esq.
                         E-mail: rrattet@rattetlaw.com

In re Omega Alpha Resources LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-32420
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-32420.pdf
         represented by: Julian Preston Vasek, Esq.
                         FRANKLIN HAYWARD LLP
                         E-mail: jvasek@franklinhayward.com

In re Gregory F. Scheihing
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 17-12124
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb17-33164.pdf
         represented by: Nathan A. Fisher, Esq.
                         E-mail: Fbarsad@cs.com

In re Sycamore Investments LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 17-33164
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb17-33164.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Patricia L. Pruitt
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 17-72266
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 21, 2017
         represented by: Kelly Megan Barnhart, Esq.
                         ROUSSOS, GLANZER & BARNHART, PLC
                         E-mail: barnhart@rgblawfirm.com

In re Los Dos Molinos Cafe Y Cantina, LLC
   Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 17-07095
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb17-07095.pdf
         represented by: Donald W. Powell, Esq.
                         CARMICHAEL & POWELL, P.C.
                         E-mail: d.powell@cplawfirm.com

In re All Phase Care, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 17-51508
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb17-51508.pdf
         represented by: Frank E. Mayo, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF FRANK E. MAYO
                         E-mail: fmayolaw@aol.com

In re Stephen Kenja Kagotho
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 17-41150
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 22, 2017
         represented by: Robert W Kovacs, Jr., Esq.
                         KOVACS LAW, P.C.
                         E-mail: bknotices@rkovacslaw.com

In re Roy Vincent Lewis and Deborah Anne Lewis
   Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No. 17-60694
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 22, 2017
         represented by: David E. Schroeder, Esq.
                         DAVID SCHROEDER LAW OFFICES, PC
                         E-mail: bk1@dschroederlaw.com

In re Milferd K. Siefke and Ann M. Siefke
   Bankr. D. Mont. Case No. 17-60607
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 22, 2017
         represented by: Edward A. Murphy, Esq.
                         MURPHY LAW OFFICES, PLLC
                         E-mail: murphylawecf@gmail.com

In re Kostas Roustas and Stella Roustas
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 17-22778
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 22, 2017
         represented by: Dino S. Mantzas, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF DINO S. MANTZAS
                         E-mail: dino@dmantzaslaw.com

In re Autum Properties Holding, LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-43232
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb17-43232.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Owen Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Valley Trailer and Mobile Truck,
LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 17-42405
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb17-42405.pdf
         represented by: Maria S Stirbis, Esq.
                         LIBERTY LAW LLC
                         E-mail: maria@stirbis-stirbis.com

In re CIG Investments, LLC
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 17-42424
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb17-42424.pdf
         represented by: Olga Rotstein, Esq.
                         ROTSTEIN LAW OFFICE PC
                         E-mail: olga.bankruptcy@gmail.com

In re Stirling Bridges, LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 17-24158
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/caeb17-24158.pdf
         represented by: Galen M. Gentry, Esq.
                         HUGHEY LAW GROUP

In re Wayne William Bennett
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 17-30600
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         represented by: Chris D. Kuhner, Esq.
                         KORNFIELD NYBERG BENDES KUHNER & LITTLE
                         E-mail: c.kuhner@kornfieldlaw.com

In re Foxy John's Inc.
   Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 17-03731
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/casb17-03731.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Select Portfolio, LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-02316
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb17-02316.pdf
         represented by: Bryan K. Mickler, Esq.
                         E-mail: court@planlaw.com

In re Glenn A. Paternoster and Carmel P. Paternoster
   Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-13415
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         represented by: David A. Riggi, Esq.
                         E-mail: darnvbk@gmail.com

In re INKSYSTEM, LLC
   Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-50778
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb17-50778.pdf
         represented by: Stephen R. Harris, Esq.
                         HARRIS LAW PRACTICE LLC
                         E-mail: steve@harrislawreno.com

In re Lucky Print LLC
   Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-50779
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb17-50779.pdf
         represented by: Stephen R. Harris, Esq.
                         HARRIS LAW PRACTICE LLC
                         E-mail: steve@harrislawreno.com

In re R.K. Keystone Mobile Mart Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 17-14318
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb17-14318.pdf
         Filed Pro Se
In re eMedical Strategies, LLC
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 17-22851
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb17-22851.pdf
         represented by: Richard D. Trenk, Esq.
                         TRENK, DIPASQUALE ET. AL.
                         E-mail: rtrenk@trenklawfirm.com

In re Pantaleo LaForgia and Anna Maria LaForgia
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 17-22853
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         represented by: Timothy P. Neumann, Esq.
                         BROEGE, NEUMANN, FISCHER & SHAVER
                         E-mail: timothy.neumann25@gmail.com

In re Maureen L. Lenahan
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 17-22871
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         represented by: Maureen P. Steady, Esq.
                         E-mail: msteady@mac.com

In re Albert Wade Black
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-32430
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         represented by: Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
                         ERIC A. LIEPINS, P.C.
                         E-mail: eric@ealpc.com

In re American Dental Associates PLLC
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 17-12155
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 23, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb17-12155.pdf
         represented by: Christopher S. Moffitt, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER S. MOFFITT
                         E-mail: moffittlawoffices@gmail.com

In re Kingridge Enterprises Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Ark. Case No. 17-13560
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/areb17-13560.pdf
         represented by: Sheila F. Campbell, Esq.
                         SHEILA CAMPBELL, P.A.
                         E-mail: campbl@sbcglobal.net

In re Burnett Family Farms, LLC
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-11154
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-11154.pdf
         represented by: Louis J. Esbin, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF LOUIS J. ESBIN
                         E-mail: Esbinlaw@sbcglobal.net

In re Kimberly Maria Rocha
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-11683
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         represented by: Anthony Obehi Egbase, Esq.
                         A.O.E LAW & ASSOCIATES, APC
                         E-mail: info@aoelaw.com

In re Sharp Financial LLC
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-17738
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-11738.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Kathy Elizabeth McDonald
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-12562
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         represented by: Kevin Tang, Esq.
                         TANG & ASSOCIATES
                         E-mail: tangkevin911@gmail.com

In re Robert Kenneth Phelps and Sharon Lee Phelps
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-15310
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         represented by: Todd L. Turoci, Esq.
                         THE TUROCI FIRM
                         E-mail: mail@theturocifirm.com

In re Paul Bodeau and Sandra Bodeau
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-17761
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         represented by: Lane K Bogard, Esq.
                         HABERBUSH & ASSOCIATES LLP
                         E-mail: lbogard@lbinsolvency.com

In re Integrity Life Sciences LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-05530
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb17-05530.pdf
         represented by: Frank A. Principe, Esq.
                         E-mail: prinlaw@prodigy.net

In re Kelly Grainger
   Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 17-50193
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         represented by: Charles M. Wynn, Esq.
                         CHARLES M. WYNN LAW OFFICES, P.A.
                         E-mail: candy@wynnlaw-fl.com

In re BKeith Transportation, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-42614
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-42614.pdf
         represented by: Behrooz P. Vida, Esq.
                         THE VIDA LAW FIRM, PLLC
                         E-mail: filings@vidalawfirm.com

In re BV Transportation, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-42615
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-42615.pdf
         represented by: Behrooz P. Vida, Esq.
                         THE VIDA LAW FIRM, PLLC
                         E-mail: filings@vidalawfirm.com

In re Palwinder Singh
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 17-12173
      Chapter 11 Petition filed June 26, 2017
         Filed Pro Se


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2017.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***