TCR_Public/170104.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, January 4, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 3

                            Headlines

344 SOUTH STREET: Disclosures OK'd; Plan Hearing on Feb. 1
ACADEMY ANIMAL: Court Dismisses Ch. 11 Case
ALSON ALSTON: Court Dismisses Bankruptcy Case
ARGENTO LLC: Disclosure Statement Hearing on Jan. 31
B.C. GRAND: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors

CORNERSTONE TOWER: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
DORAL DENTAL: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on March 13
E.O. WOOD: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 19
ENERGY FUTURE: Asbestos Claimants Lose Bid to Junk Ch. 11 Petitions
ENERGY FUTURE: Cancels Registration of Shares Under Incentive Plan

ENERGY FUTURE: Sixth Amended Plan Documents Filed
ERICKSON INC: Certificate of Incorporation Amended
FISHHAWK DENTAL: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 26
FOURZERO INC: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 25
FRAC SPECIALISTS: Unsecureds To Recoup Up To 13% Under Plan

HAGERSTOWN BLOCK: Unsecureds To Recoup 100% Within 180 Days
HARBORVIEW TOWERS: Unsecured Convenience Claimholders May Get 100%
HAYDEL PROPERTIES: Hearing on Disclosures Set For Feb. 16
JOYCE LESLIE: Unsecureds To Recover Up To 6% Under Plan
K & C LV INVESTMENTS: Equanimity Commits Up to $1.7MM Funding

K & C LV INVESTMENTS: Hearing on Disclosures Set For Jan. 9
LINCOLN MEDICAL: Can Use Key Star Cash Collateral on Final Basis
MADISON CONSTRUCTION: Cash Collateral Use on Interim Basis OK
MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATES: Can Use Cash Collateral Until Jan. 31
MAXUS ENERGY: Unsecureds To Recoup Up to 25% Under Liquidation Plan

ML HOSPITALITY: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 31
OAKS OF PRAIRIE: Cash Collateral Use Through Jan. 31 OK
OFF THE BOAT: Wants to Use Everett Co-Operative Bank Cash
PAC RECYCLING: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
PEABODY ENERGY: More Noteholders Join Backstop, Placement Deals

PERFORMANCE SPORTS: UST Balks at Houlihan Lokey's Fee Provisions
QUINTESS LLC: Can Get Postpetition Loan, Use Cash on Final Basis
RESCUE ONE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ROUST CORPORATION: To Seek Approval of Prepack Plan on Jan. 6
RUBLE HOLDINGS: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Feb. 9

SQN HELO 5: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
STARZ ACQUISITION: Can Use Cash Collateral Until March 31
WAYSIDE PRODUCTIONS: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 31
WHISKEY ONE: Court Denies Approval of Disclosure Statement
WILLIAM CONTRACTOR: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Feb. 15

YBRANT MEDIA: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 26
YOGA SMOGA: Wants to Obtain $350,000 DIP Financing

                            *********

344 SOUTH STREET: Disclosures OK'd; Plan Hearing on Feb. 1
----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Eric L. Frank of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania has approved 344 South Street Corp.'s
amended small business disclosure statement referring to the
Debtor's plan of reorganization.

A hearing to consider the confirmation of the Plan will be held on
Feb. 1, 2017, at 11:00 a.m.

Objections to the confirmation of the Plan must be filed by Jan.
27, 2017.

Jan. 20, 2017, at 5:00 p.m. is the deadline by which ballots must
be received in order to be considered as acceptances or rejections
of the Plan.

Jan. 25, 2017, is the date by which the Debtor will file a report
of plan voting.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 26, 2016, the
Debtor filed with the Court an amended disclosure statement dated
Dec. 9, 2016, referring to the Debtor's plan of reorganization.
General unsecured creditors are classified in Class 3, and will
receive a distribution of 35% of their allowed claims, to be
distributed in equal monthly interval payments starting Feb. 1,
2017, and ending on Nov. 17, 2020.

                    About 344 South Street

344 South Street Corp. has operated as a restaurant, serving
Spanish and Mexican cuisine in Philadelphia's South Street
District.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Penn. Case No. 15-18278) on Nov. 17, 2015,
and is represented by Raheem S. Watson, Esq., at Watson LLC, in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities below $500,000.


ACADEMY ANIMAL: Court Dismisses Ch. 11 Case
-------------------------------------------
Judge Frank W. Volk of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of West Virginia granted the United States
Trustee's motion to dismiss the case captioned IN RE: ACADEMY
ANIMAL HOSPITAL, INC., Debtor, CASE NO. 2:15-BK-20618 (Bankr. S.D.
W.Va.).

Academy Animal Hospital, Inc., petitioned for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code on December 1, 2015.  Academy operates a
veterinary clinic in Saint Albans.  This is a small business case
under 11 U.S.C. sections 101(51D) and 101(51C).

Judge Volk pointed out that under 11 U.S.C. section 1121(e)(2), the
plan and disclosure statement (if any) in a small business case
shall be filed not later than 300 days after the date of the order
for relief.  Citing In re Martinson, 731 F.2d 543, 544 n.3 (8th
Cir. 1984), the judge explained that "The words 'order for relief'
refer to the commencement of a voluntary petition for bankruptcy."

Since Academy filed its Chapter 11 petition on December 1, 2015, it
had until May 29, 2016 -- the 300th day after December 1, 2015 --
to file its plan of reorganization.  The Court has received no such
plan nor any further motion seeking an extension of the September
25, 2016, extended deadline permitted by the Court on September 25,
2016.  Consequently, no further extension order has been signed
prior to expiration of the extended 180-day deadline.

Accordingly, Judge Volk granted the United States Trustee's motion
to dismiss.

A full-text copy of Judge Volk's December 29, 2016 memorandum
opinion and order is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvsb15-bk-20618-98.pdf

                    About Academy Animal Hospital

Academy Animal Hospital, Inc., which operates a veterinary clinic
in Saint Albans, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
S.D. W.Va. Case No. 15-20618) on December 1, 2015.  The debtor is
represented by James M. Pierson, Esq.


ALSON ALSTON: Court Dismisses Bankruptcy Case
---------------------------------------------
Judge Mary D. France of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Pennsylvania dismissed the case captioned IN RE:
ALSON ALSTON, dba ALSTON BUSINESS CONSULTING dba SONGHAI CITY, LLC
dba SONGHAI ENTERPRISES, LLC dba SONGHAI CITY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
dba SONGHAI CITY REAL ESTATE, LLC dba ENCORE GENERAL MERCHANDISE,
LLC dba ENCORE GENERAL STORE dba DRAGON MANAGEMENT SERVICES aka AL
ALSTON, Debtor, Case No.: 1:14-BK-03454 MDF (Bankr. M.D. Pa.).

Alson Alston filed a Sixth Amended Disclosure Statement and Plan of
Reorganization on August 26, 2016.  Objections to the Disclosure
Statement, the Plan or both were filed by Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, AS Peleus, LLC, Ocwen
Loan Servicing, LLC for Wells Fargo Bank, LSF9 Master Participation
Trust, and JP Morgan Chase Bank.

Judge France found that Alston's disclosure statements provided
inadequate support for the values attributed to the various parcels
of real estate owned by Alston, which was necessary to prepare a
meaningful liquidation analysis.  The judge also found that the
disclosure statements failed to include a complete budget of income
and expenses, particularly expenses related to real property
management.  The judge noted that although information was provided
on obligations paid, no information was provided on the numerous
unpaid obligations accruing each month.

Judge France also found that while each amended disclosure
statement and plan submitted by Alston has become more complex,
after two years the disclosure statement continues to lack adequate
information to demonstrate that the plan is sufficiently funded and
that creditors will receive more in a Chapter 11 case than they
would in a Chapter 7 case.

Judge France concluded that the case must either be dismissed or
converted, having found cause for conversion or dismissal and not
having found the existence of "unusual circumstances."  The judge
also observed that after being served with an order directing
Alston to show cause why the case should not be dismissed, none of
the objecting creditors indicated any opposition to dismissal of
the case.  Thus, upon consideration of the entire docket and
history of the case, Judge France believed that dismissal is in the
best interest of the creditors and the estate.

A full-text copy of Judge France's December 27, 2016 opinion is
available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb14-bk-03454-451.pdf

                       About Alson Alston

Alson Alston -- dba Alston Business Consulting, dba Songhai City,
LLC, dba Songhai Enterprises, LLC, dba Songhai City Entertainment,
LLC, dba Songhai City Real Estate, LLC, dba Encore General
Merchandise LLC, dba Encore General Store, dba Dragon Management
Services, aka Al Alston -- is an individual who purchased various
parcels of commercial or mixed-use (commercial and residential)
real estate as a profit-making venture.  In addition, the Debtor
operated several businesses at several of those Properties.

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No.
14-03454) on July 28, 2014.


ARGENTO LLC: Disclosure Statement Hearing on Jan. 31
----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona is set to
hold a hearing on Jan. 31, at 10:30 a.m., to consider approval of
the disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization of Argento, LLC.

The hearing will take place at Courtroom No. 702, 7th Floor, 230
North First Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona.  Objections must be filed
five business days prior to the hearing.

Under the proposed restructuring plan, holders of allowed Class 7
unsecured claims will receive full payment within 20 quarters after
the effective date of the plan.  These unsecured creditors will
receive a total of $3,865.

                          About Argento

Argento, LLC is an Arizona limited liability company formed in 2006
for the purpose of acquiring and operating a commercial building
located at 15770 N. Greenway-Hayden Loop, Scottsdale,
Arizona 85260.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Ariz. Case No. 16-01736) on Feb. 25, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Maria Papagno, member.

The Debtor is represented by Blake D. Gunn, Esq., at the Law Office
of Blake D. Gunn.  The case is assigned to Judge Madeleine C.
Wanslee.

The Debtor disclosed total assets of $3.5 million and total debts
of $3.13 million.


B.C. GRAND: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: B.C. Grand, LLC
        44 Broad St. NW, Suite 400
        Atlanta, GA 30303

Case No.: 17-50094

Type of Business: Single Asset Real Estate

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 2, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta)

Debtor's Counsel: Michael D. Robl, Esq.
                  ROBL LAW GROUP LLC
                  Suite 250
                  3754 LaVista Road
                  Tucker, GA 30084
                  Tel: 404-373-5153
                  Fax: 404-537-1761
                  E-mail: mdrobl@tsrlaw.com
                          michael@roblgroup.com

Total Assets: $17.03 million

Total Debt: $4.13 million

The petition was signed by Charles E. Johnson, Sr., authorized
representative.

Debtor's List of Three Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
CapitalPlus Equity, LLC                                       $0

Kevin Ross, Esq.                                              $0

ThyssenKrupp Elevator Americas                           $23,840


CORNERSTONE TOWER: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska has approved
Cornerstone Tower Service, Inc.'s disclosure statement referring to
the Debtor's plan of reorganization.

A hearing was held on Dec. 21, 2016.  John Hahn Appeared for
Debtor; Jerry Jensen appeared for the United States Trustee;
Kristin Krueger appeared for Committee of Unsecured Creditors; and
Dennis Dressler appeared for Iszu Finance.  Objections to the
Disclosure Statement are overruled for the reasons stated on
record.  The Disclosure Statement as Supplemented is approved,
however, the Debtor is directed to file an amended plan by January
20, 2017.  Once the amended plan is filed the clerk will schedule
an objection to confirmation deadline and set a confirmation
hearing.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 23, 2016, the
Debtor filed with the Court the supplemental disclosure statement
to the Debtor's Disclosure Statement filed on Nov. 9, 2016.

Headquartered in Grand Island, Nebraska, Cornerstone Tower
Service,
Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Neb.
Case No. 16-40787) on May 13, 2016, estimating its assets at
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities at between $1
billion and $10 billion. The petition was signed by James Scheer,
president.

Judge Thomas L. Saladino presides over the case.

John C. Hahn, Esq., at Jeffrey, Hahn, Hemmerling & Zimmerman
Serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

On June 20, 2016, the U.S. Trustee for the District of Nebraska
appointed the Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  On Aug. 24,
2016, the U.S. Trustee filed an Amended Committee appointment.  The
Committee currently consists of three members.  The Committee hired
Koley Jessen, P.C., L.L.O., as its legal counsel.


DORAL DENTAL: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on March 13
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of Doral
Dental, P.A. at a hearing on March 13.

The hearing will be held at 2:30 p.m., at Courtroom 8, 301 N. Miami
Avenue, Miami, Florida.

The court had earlier approved the disclosure statement, allowing
Doral Dental to start soliciting votes from creditors.  

The Dec. 19 order set a Feb. 27 deadline for creditors to cast
their votes and file their objections to the plan.

Under the plan, allowed non-insider unsecured claims will be paid
100% beginning the effective date of the plan.

Doral Dental will fund payments under the proposed plan from income
earned from the operation of its business, according to court
filings.

                       About Doral Dental

Doral Dental, PA, is a professional corporation located at 10818 NW
58 St, Miami, Florida 33178.  Insiders of the Debtor consist of
owner Dr. Kerry Smith, the dentist.

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
16-13927) on March 21, 2016.  The Debtor is represented by Joel M.
Aresty, Esq.


E.O. WOOD: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 19
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of E.O. Wood Co., Inc. at
a hearing on Jan. 19.

The hearing will be held at 1:30 a.m., at the U.S. Courthouse,
Courtroom 108, 501 W. 10th Street, Fort Worth, Texas.

The court will also consider at the hearing the final approval of
the company's disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved
on Dec. 19.

The order set a Jan. 11 deadline for creditors to cast their votes
and file their objections.

The plan proposes to pay creditors from the proceeds generated from
the sale of E.O. Wood's assets to Distribution International, Inc.


Unsecured creditors with allowed unsecured claims will share on a
pro-rata basis $60,000 on their allowed claims resulting in an
approximate return of 15.47%.  The plan also provides for the full
payment of allowed administrative and priority claims as well as
allowed secured claims.

                       About E.O. Wood Co.

E.O. Wood Co., Inc. filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 15-42830) on July 15, 2015. The Debtor
is represented by Behrooz P. Vida, Esq. of The Vida Law Firm, PLLC.
The case is assigned to Judge Mark X. Mullin.


ENERGY FUTURE: Asbestos Claimants Lose Bid to Junk Ch. 11 Petitions
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christopher S. Sontchi of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware denied the motion filed by Shirley
Fenicle, David William Fahy, John H. Jones, and David Heinzmann to
dismiss the Chapter 11 petitions of LSGT Debtors EEC, Inc., EEC
Holdings, Inc., LSGT Sacroc, Inc., and LSGT Gas Co. LLC.

Thirty-one months after the filing of these Chapter 11 cases in
April 2014 and on the eve of the third confirmation hearing in
these cases, several persons asserting asbestos-related claims
against the LSGT Debtors have brought a motion to dismiss the LSGT
Debtors' cases as having been filed in bad faith.  The motion to
dismiss, however, is based upon events that transpired after the
petition date.  The crux of the movants' complaint is that the plan
of reorganization before the Court provides (as did the plan
confirmed in December 2015 that was subsequently rendered void for
unrelated reasons) for the discharge of unmanifested asbestos
claims where the claimant did not timely file a proof of claim
under a bar date order approved in 2015 -- a scenario that was not
contemplated until July 2014 at the earliest.

Judge Sontchi found that the evidence clearly establishes that
based on the totality of the circumstances the LSGT Debtors'
bankruptcy petitions were filed in good faith because the filing
was for a valid bankruptcy purpose and not as a litigation tactic.
The judge noted that the LSGT Debtors' bankruptcy was filed for
three primary purposes:  

     -- First, they were filed to avoid immediate cash flow       

        insolvency.

     -- Second, the Debtors as a whole were facing the prospect    
    
        of a huge $6.5 billion deconsolidation tax for which
        three of the LSGT Debtors would have been jointly and      
  
        severally liable.  The LSGT Debtors believed that their
        best hope for avoiding a tax bill that would have greatly
        impaired their asbestos creditors was to file bankruptcy
        in order to participate directly in the solution to the
        $6.5 billion tax problem.

     -- Third, the LSGT Debtors filed bankruptcy in the hope of
        negotiating a resolution in bankruptcy that would
        maximize both the value of their assets and the recovery
        on their asbestos related claims.

Thus, Judge Sontchi found that there can be no question that the
LSGT Debtors' decision to file bankruptcy was in good faith and
subsequent events have proven the decision to have been correct.
Furthermore, the judge also found that the motion is barred as
untimely by the doctrine of laches.

The case is In re: ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP., et al., Debtors,
Case No. 14-10979 (CSS) (Bankr. D. Del.).

A full-text copy of Judge Sontchi's December 19, 2016 opinion is
available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb14-10979-10414.pdf

                        About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a Portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.

Oncor, an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the
largest regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth. EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion.  The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal. The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,
and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as
legal advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor.  The
EFH equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for
The second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is
represented by Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and
Gregory A. Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S.
Weisfelner, Esq., Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq.,
Jeremy B. Coffey, Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.  An Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in the case.
The Committee represents the interests of the unsecured creditors
of only Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC; EFCH's
direct subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC;
and EFH Corporate Services Company, and of no other debtors.  The
Committee has selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and Polsinelli PC
for representation in this high-profile energy restructuring.  The
lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck, Esq., Brett H.
Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at Morrison & Foerster
LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K. Edelson, Esq., Shanti
M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at Polsinelli PC.

                          *     *     *

In December 2015, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Debtors'
reorganization plan, which contemplated a tax-free spin of the
company's competitive businesses, including Luminant and TXU
Energy, and the $20 billion sale of its holdings in non-debtor
electricity transaction unit Oncor Electric Delivery Co. to a
consortium of investors.  But the Plan became null and void after
certain first lien creditors notified the occurrence of a "plan
support termination event."

The Debtors filed a new plan of reorganization on May 1, 2016, as
subsequently amended.  The new Chapter 11 plan features
alternative options for dealing with the Company's stake in
electricity transmission unit Oncor.

On Aug. 29, 2016, Judge Sontchi confirmed the Chapter 11 exit
plans of two of Energy Future Holdings Corp.'s subsidiaries, power
generator Luminant and retail electricity provider TXU Energy Inc.
(the "T-Side Debtors").  The Plan became effective on Oct. 3,
2016.

On Sept. 21, 2016, the Debtors filed the E-Side Plan and the
Disclosure Statement for the Fourth Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization of Energy Future Holdings Corp., et al., Pursuant
to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as it Applies to the EFH
Debtors and EFIH Debtors (the "E-Side Debtors").


ENERGY FUTURE: Cancels Registration of Shares Under Incentive Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Future Holdings Corp. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration No.
333-172332 to FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT.

The Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 is an amendment to the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-172332) of Energy
Future Holdings, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
February 18, 2011, which registered 72,000,000 shares of the
Company's common stock, without par value, pursuant to the
Company's 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.

In connection with the Debtors' Bankruptcy Filing, EFH said the
offerings pursuant to the Registration Statement have been
terminated.  The Company hence removes from registration any shares
of Company Common Stock registered under the Registration Statement
that remain unsold under the Registration Statement as of the
filing date of this Post-Effective Amendment No. 1.

                      About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a Portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.

Oncor, an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the
largest regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth. EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion.  The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal. The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,
and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as
legal
advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor.  The EFH
equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for
The second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is
represented by Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and
Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.  An Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in the case. The Committee
represents the interests of the unsecured creditors of only Energy
Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC; EFCH's direct subsidiary,
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC; and EFH Corporate
Services Company, and of no other debtors.  The Committee has
selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and Polsinelli PC for
representation in this high-profile energy restructuring.  The
lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck, Esq., Brett H.
Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at Morrison & Foerster
LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K. Edelson, Esq.,
Shanti M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at Polsinelli PC.

                          *     *     *

In December 2015, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Debtors'
reorganization plan, which contemplated a tax-free spin of the
company's competitive businesses, including Luminant and TXU
Energy, and the $20 billion sale of its holdings in non-debtor
electricity transaction unit Oncor Electric Delivery Co. to a
consortium of investors.  But the Plan became null and void after
certain first lien creditors notified the occurrence of a "plan
support termination event."

The Debtors filed a new plan of reorganization on May 1, 2016, as
subsequently amended.  The new Chapter 11 plan features alternative
options for dealing with the Company's stake in electricity
transmission unit Oncor.

On Aug. 29, 2016, Judge Sontchi confirmed the Chapter 11 exit plans
of two of Energy Future Holdings Corp.'s subsidiaries, power
generator Luminant and retail electricity provider TXU Energy Inc.
(the "T-Side Debtors").  The Plan became effective on Oct. 3,
2016.

On Sept. 21, 2016, the Debtors filed the E-Side Plan and the
Disclosure Statement for the Fourth Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization of Energy Future Holdings Corp., et al., Pursuant to
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as it Applies to the EFH Debtors
and EFIH Debtors (the "E-Side Debtors").


ENERGY FUTURE: Sixth Amended Plan Documents Filed
-------------------------------------------------
Energy Future Holdings Corp., Energy Future Intermediate Holding
Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and certain of EFH Corp.'s
subsidiaries filed a Sixth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization and
related disclosure statement on December 28, 2016.

The revised Plan documents reflect a ruling by the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in November that reversed
the decisions of the lower courts regarding the allowance of the
Makewhole Claims asserted by Holders of EFIH First Lien Notes and
Holders of EFIH Second Lien Notes, and the subsequent settlement of
the EFIH First Lien Makewhole Claims and EFIH Second Lien Makewhole
Claims.

As a result of the Third Circuit Makewhole Decision, the EFIH First
Lien Makewhole Claims and EFIH Second Lien Makewhole Claims are
neither Disallowed Makewhole Claims nor Allowed Makewhole Claims.
Because such claims are no longer Disallowed Makewhole Claims, a
condition precedent to consummation of the Plan as it relates to
the EFH Debtors and EFIH Debtors could not be satisfied (although
the Plan Sponsor could waive such condition in its sole and
absolute discretion). Following the issuance of the Third Circuit
Decision, the EFH Debtors, EFIH Debtors, and their advisors began
evaluating how to reallocate the consideration being provided by
NextEra pursuant to the Merger Agreement.  In order to evaluate all
possible options, the EFH Debtors and EFIH Debtors suspended the
remainder of the EFH/EFIH Scheduling Order and adjourned the Plan
confirmation hearing.  

The Debtors disclosed in a regulatory filing on Dec. 19 that, EFH
Corp. and EFIH executed confidentiality agreements with certain
holders of first lien claims against EFIH -- Restricted EFIH First
Lien Creditors -- certain holders of second lien claims against
EFIH -- Restricted EFIH Second Lien Creditors -- and certain
holders of unsecured claims against EFIH.  These confidentiality
agreements facilitated discussions between the Debtors and the
Creditors concerning the Plan and support of the Creditors for the
Plan. As a result of these discussions, the Debtors, the Restricted
EFIH First Lien Creditors and Restricted EFIH Second Lien Creditors
have agreed on the economic terms regarding the settlements.

Pursuant to the confidentiality agreements, the Companies agreed to
disclose publicly after a specified period if certain conditions
were met that the Debtors and the Creditors had engaged in
negotiations concerning the Plan, the Creditors’ support for the
Plan and information regarding such negotiations.

                  EFIH First Lien Settlement and
                    EFIH Second Lien Settlement

Holders of first lien claims against EFIH and holders of second
lien claims against EFIH have asserted certain makewhole claims
under the indentures governing the first lien and second lien notes
issued by EFIH.  On December 16, 2016, the Debtors and the
Restricted EFIH First Lien Creditors agreed in principle to settle
the EFIH First Lien Makewhole Claims -- which include both the
"Applicable Premium" or other sums due at the time of redemption,
plus interest thereon -- as set forth:

     * a 95% recovery on such claims if (a) holders of a certain
       class of unsecured claims against EFIH (Class B6 as
       defined in the Plan) (the "EFIH Unsecured Noteholders")
       vote to accept the Amended Plan (as defined below) and (b)
       no EFIH Unsecured Noteholder objects to approval of the
       Plan Support Agreement (as defined below) (including the
       EFIH First Lien Settlement and EFIH Second Lien Settlement
       (as defined below)) by the Bankruptcy Court; or

     * a 97% recovery on such claims if (a) the EFIH Unsecured
       Noteholders reject the Amended Plan or (b) any EFIH
       Unsecured Noteholder objects to approval of the Plan
       Support Agreement (including the EFIH First Lien
       Settlement and EFIH Second Lien Settlement) by the
       Bankruptcy Court,

plus, in each case, 100% of unpaid interest unrelated to the EFIH
First Lien Makewhole Claims (including Additional Interest (as
defined in the Plan) and interest on interest), fees and expenses.

On December 16, 2016, the Debtors and the Restricted EFIH Second
Lien Creditors agreed in principle to settle the EFIH Second Lien
Makewhole Claims -- which include both the "Applicable Premium, "
the call premium or other sums due at the time of redemption, plus
interest thereon -- as set forth:

     * a 87.5% recovery on such claims if (a) the EFIH Unsecured
       Noteholders vote to accept the Amended Plan and (b) no
       EFIH Unsecured Noteholder objects to approval of the Plan
       Support Agreement (including the EFIH First Lien
       Settlement and EFIH Second Lien Settlement) by the
       Bankruptcy Court; or

     * a 92% recovery on such claims if (a) the EFIH Unsecured
       Noteholders reject the amended Plan or (b) any EFIH
       Unsecured Noteholder objects to approval of the Plan
       Support Agreement (including the EFIH First Lien
       Settlement and EFIH Second Lien Settlement) by the
       Bankruptcy Court,

plus, in each case, 100% of unpaid principal, interest unrelated to
the EFIH Second Lien Makewhole Claims (including Additional
Interest (as defined in the Plan) and interest on interest), fees
and expenses.

The Restricted EFIH Second Lien Creditors agreed to the EFIH Second
Lien Settlement in principle, so long as the Plan Support Agreement
provides that, subject to certain conditions and payment of the
claims relating to the EFIH First Lien Notes, the intercreditor
litigation commenced by the EFIH First Lien Notes Trustee against
the EFIH Second Lien Notes Trustee will be dismissed. The
Restricted EFIH First Lien Creditors, the Restricted EFIH Second
Lien Creditors, and the Debtors are continuing to discuss the terms
of the Plan Support Agreement.
Assuming an April 30, 2017 effective date of the Amended Plan, the
amount of the EFIH First Lien Makewhole Claims (including interest)
will be approximately $574.0 million and the amount of the EFIH
Second Lien Makewhole Claims (including interest) will be
approximately $244.6 million (not taking in account the application
of the settlement percentage discount noted above). The percentage
settlements as contemplated by the EFIH First Lien Settlement and
EFIH Second Lien Settlement, respectively are not tied to a
specific payment date.

The EFIH First Lien Settlement provides for payment in full of
unpaid interest (including "Additional Interest" and interest on
interest) and of fees and expenses. Assuming an April 30, 2017
effective date of the Amended Plan, the following amounts unrelated
to the EFIH First Lien Makewhole Claims will be due:

     approximately $1.1 million in "Additional Interest" and
     approximately $1.2 million in interest on interest.

In the context of the EFIH First Lien Settlement, the Restricted
EFIH First Lien Creditors estimated the amount of reimbursable fees
and expenses, assuming an April 30, 2017 effective date of the
Amended Plan, to be approximately $38 million, though the actual
amount could be more or less, and additional fees and would
continue to accrue.

The EFIH Second Lien Settlement provides for payment in full of
principal, unpaid interest (including "Additional Interest" and
interest on interest) and of fees and expenses. Assuming an April
30, 2017 effective date of the Amended Plan, the following amounts
unrelated to the EFIH Second Lien Makewhole Claims will be due:
approximately $1.7 billion in unpaid principal amount,
approximately $439.1 million in accrued unpaid interest (including
Additional Interest) and approximately $46.3 million in accrued
unpaid interest on interest. In the context of the EFIH Second Lien
Settlement, the Restricted EFIH Second Lien Creditors estimated the
amount of reimbursable fees and expenses through October 31, 2016
to be approximately $17.1 million, though additional fees and
expenses have accrued, and will continue to accrue.

Each of the claims (other than for fees and expenses) listed above
will continue to accrue interest, at the rates and on the terms
specified in the applicable indenture governing the particular
notes, until paid in full, and the amount of such claims is likely
to change if the effective date of the Plan changes.

The Debtors, the Restricted EFIH First Lien Creditors, and the
Restricted EFIH Second Lien Creditors negotiated the terms of a
plan support agreement and amended Plan to reflect the terms set
forth regarding the EFIH First Lien Settlement and the EFIH Second
Lien Settlement.  The Debtors expect to seek approval of the EFIH
First Lien Settlement and EFIH Second Lien Settlement
contemporaneously with the hearing to consider confirmation of the
Amended Plan.

The Plan Support Agreement is expected to provide that, subject to
certain conditions, the EFIH First Lien Noteholders and EFIH Second
Lien Noteholders that sign the Plan Support Agreement will vote
their claims in favor of the Amended Plan. In addition, the Plan
Support Agreement is expected to include certain termination
rights, including the right of the Debtors to terminate the Plan
Support Agreement if the board of directors (or other similar
governing body) of the applicable Debtor determines in its sole
discretion that, prior to a date or event to be negotiated,
proceeding with the Amended Plan or the transactions contemplated
by the Agreement would be inconsistent with its applicable
fiduciary duties.

            Discussions with EFIH Unsecured Noteholders

During the negotiations with the Restricted EFIH First Lien
Creditors and the Restricted EFIH Second Lien Creditors,
professionals for the Restricted EFIH Unsecured Noteholders
communicated to the Debtors, the Restricted EFIH First Lien
Creditors, and the Restricted EFIH Second Lien Creditors that the
Restricted EFIH Unsecured Noteholders would be supportive of a
settlement consisting of an amendment or amendments to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 29, 2016, as amended, by
and among NextEra Energy, Inc., EFH Merger Co., LLC, EFIH and EFH
Corp. that would result in approximately $150 million of additional
distributable value under the Plan, as well as the following:

     * the EFIH First Lien Noteholders would settle the EFIH
       First Lien Makewhole Claims for 93%, with the recovery on
       the remaining 7% to be used to satisfy Allowed Claims
       pursuant to the Amended Plan; and

     * the EFIH Second Lien Noteholders would settle the EFIH
       Second Lien Makewhole Claims for 80%, with the recovery on
       the remaining 20% to be used to satisfy Allowed Claims
       pursuant to the Amended Plan.

This proposal was not accepted by the Restricted EFIH First Lien
Creditors or the Restricted EFIH Second Lien Creditors.

On December 16, 2016, the Debtors (with the support of the
Restricted EFIH First Lien Creditors and the Restricted EFIH Second
Lien Creditors) proposed to the Restricted EFIH Unsecured
Noteholders that they would agree to settle the EFIH First Lien
Claims and the EFIH Second Lien Claims on the following economic
terms in exchange for the support of the settlement by the EFIH
Unsecured Noteholders:

     * the EFIH First Lien Noteholders would settle the EFIH
       First Lien Makewhole Claims for 94%, with the recovery on
       the remaining 6% to be used to satisfy Allowed Claims
       pursuant to the Amended Plan; and

     * the EFIH Second Lien Noteholders would settle the EFIH
       Second Lien Makewhole Claims for 85% with the recovery on
       the remaining 15% to be used to satisfy Allowed Claims
       pursuant to the Amended Plan.

The Restricted EFIH Unsecured Creditors did not accept this
proposal within the 24-hour time period specified in the offer.
The Debtors have not reached agreement on the terms of any change
in the Plan with the Restricted EFIH Unsecured Noteholders. Certain
of the Restricted EFIH Unsecured Noteholders have directed their
advisors to continue to work with the Debtors and their advisors to
explore further whether the parties can reach an agreement on
changes to the Plan, including support of the Amended Plan.

At the time of the filing of the Sixth Amended Plan documents, the
EFIH PIK Group has not confirmed the support of Holders of at least
66-2/3% of the aggregate, outstanding amount of EFIH Unsecured Note
Claims.  As a result, the EFH/EFIH Debtors are continuing to
negotiate the terms of the EFIH Secured Creditor Plan Support
Agreement with professionals representing Holders of EFIH First
Lien Note Claims and EFIH Second Lien Note Claims.  

According to the Debtors, if the EFIH PIK Group obtains the
necessary threshold support, the EFH Board of Directors, the EFIH
Board of Managers, and the EFIH Finance Board of Managers have
authorized the EFH/EFIH Debtors to exercise the Fiduciary Duty
Provision, if necessary, to pivot to the PIK Proposal.  Pursuit of
the PIK Proposal does not necessarily foreclose the possibility of
a settlement with Holders of EFIH First Lien Note Claims and
Holders of EFIH Second Lien Note Claims, and the EFH/EFIH Debtors
will continue to engage with all interested stakeholders with the
hopes of generating as much consensus as possible.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware is slated to hold a hearing (x)
on Jan. 4, 2017 to consider approving the Disclosure Statement and
(y) beginning on Feb. 14, 2017 to consider confirmation of the
Amended Joint Plan.

According to the Sixth Amended Disclosure Statement, holders of
EFIH First Lien Note Claims in Class B3 and EFIH Second Lien Note
Claims in Class B4 -- as well as Class B6 General Unsecured Claims
Against the EFIH Debtors -- are entitled to vote on the Plan.

Plan votes are due Feb. 6, not Jan. 13, according to the Sixth
Amended Disclosure Statement.

A blacklined copy of the Sixth Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb14-10979-10447.pdf

                        About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a Portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.

Oncor, an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the
largest regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth. EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion.  The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal. The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,
and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as
legal
advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor.  The EFH
equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for
The second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is
represented by Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and
Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.  An Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in the case. The Committee
represents the interests of the unsecured creditors of only Energy
Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC; EFCH's direct subsidiary,
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC; and EFH Corporate
Services Company, and of no other debtors.  The Committee has
selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and Polsinelli PC for
representation in this high-profile energy restructuring.  The
lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck, Esq., Brett H.
Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at Morrison & Foerster
LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K. Edelson, Esq.,
Shanti M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at Polsinelli PC.

                          *     *     *

In December 2015, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Debtors'
reorganization plan, which contemplated a tax-free spin of the
company's competitive businesses, including Luminant and TXU
Energy, and the $20 billion sale of its holdings in non-debtor
electricity transaction unit Oncor Electric Delivery Co. to a
consortium of investors.  But the Plan became null and void after
certain first lien creditors notified the occurrence of a "plan
support termination event."

The Debtors filed a new plan of reorganization on May 1, 2016, as
subsequently amended.  The new Chapter 11 plan features alternative
options for dealing with the Company's stake in electricity
transmission unit Oncor.

On Aug. 29, 2016, Judge Sontchi confirmed the Chapter 11 exit plans
of two of Energy Future Holdings Corp.'s subsidiaries, power
generator Luminant and retail electricity provider TXU Energy Inc.
(the "T-Side Debtors").  The Plan became effective on Oct. 3,
2016.

On Sept. 21, 2016, the Debtors filed the E-Side Plan and the
Disclosure Statement for the Fourth Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization of Energy Future Holdings Corp., et al., Pursuant to
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as it Applies to the EFH Debtors
and EFIH Debtors (the "E-Side Debtors").


ERICKSON INC: Certificate of Incorporation Amended
--------------------------------------------------
Erickson Incorporated filed on Dec. 16, 2016, a Certificate of
Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware,
which amended the provisions of the Company's Third Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed on April 1, 2014.

The Certificate of Amendment was required as a result of the
Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release
entered into on June 13, 2016 among the Company, EAC Acquisition
Corporation, Udo Reider, Hank Halter, Kenneth Lau, Quinn Morgan,
Gary Scott, James Welch, Meredith Siegfried Madden, ZM Private
Equity Fund I, L.P., ZM Private Equity Fund II, L.P., ZM EAC LLC,
Centre Lane Partners, LLC, 10th Lane Finance Co., LLC., and Edward
Montgomery, on behalf of himself as a stockholder of the Company, a
class of minority stockholders of the Company and derivatively on
behalf of the Company.

The Certificate of Amendment provided for, in pertinent part, the
following material changes to the existing Certificate of
Incorporation:

     -- Prior to the Trigger Date, the Company shall not enter into
a Change of Control Transaction unless the principal terms of such
transaction are approved by a board committee consisting of
independent and disinterested directors, empowered to negotiate and
authorize such transaction, and all holders of then-outstanding
common shares are offered or paid the same amount and form of
consideration per common share in such transaction.

     -- Prior to the Trigger Date, the Company will not enter into
a Qualifying Related Party Transaction unless the principal terms
of such transaction are approved by a board committee consisting of
independent and disinterested directors, empowered to negotiate and
authorize such transaction.

A copy of the Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation is
available at
https://is.gd/dVCY0Z

                        About Erickson

Founded in 1971, Erickson Incorporated --
http://www.ericksoninc.com/-- is a vertically-integrated
manufacturer and operator of the powerful heavy-lift Erickson S-64
Aircrane helicopter, and is a leading global provider of aviation
services.

Erickson Incorporated, based in Portland, OR, and its affiliates
each filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex.; Erickson
Incorporated, Case No. 16-34393; Evergreen Helicopters
International, Inc., Case No. 16-34392; EAC Acquisition
Corporation, Case No. 16-34394; Erickson Helicopters, Inc., Case
No. 16-34395; Erickson Transport, Inc., Case No. 16-34396;
Evergreen Equity, Inc., Case No. 16-34397; Evergreen Unmanned
Systems, Inc., Case No. 16-34398) on Nov. 8, 2016.  The Hon.
Barbara J. Houser presides over the cases.  In its petition,
Erickson estimated $942.8 million in assets and $881.5 million in
liabilities.

The Debtors have hired Haynes and Boone, LLP as counsel; Imperial
Capital LLC, as investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal as financial
and restructuring advisor; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants as
claims and noticing agent.


FISHHAWK DENTAL: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 26
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of
Fishhawk Dental, P.A., at a hearing on Jan. 26.

The hearing will be held at 10:00 a.m., at Courtroom 9B, 801 North
Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida.

The court will also consider at the hearing the final approval of
Fishhawk's disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved on
Dec. 20.

Creditors are required to cast their votes no later than eight days
before the hearing.  Objections must be filed no later than seven
days before the hearing.

                      About Fishhawk Dental

Fishhawk Dental, P.A., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-07855) on Sept. 12, 2016, estimating
its assets at up to $50,000 and its liabilities at between $100,001
and $500,000.  Joel M. Aresty, Esq., at Joel M. Aresty PA serves as
the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


FOURZERO INC: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 25
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of
Fourzero Inc. at a hearing on Jan. 25.

The hearing will be held at 9:00 a.m., at the Jose V. Toledo U.S.
Post Office and Courthouse Building, Courtroom 3, Third Floor, 300
Recinto Sur Street, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

The court will also consider at the hearing the final approval of
Fourzero's disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved on
Dec. 20.

Creditors are required to file their objections and cast their
votes not less than 14 days prior to the hearing.

Under the proposed plan, general unsecured creditors will recover
11.7% of their allowed claims.  They will receive payments of their
claims in 60 months at an interest rate of 4.5%.  The total payment
would be $10,194, according to court filings.

                       About Fourzero Inc.

Fourzero, Inc. sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D.P.R. Case No. 16-00100) on Jan. 12, 2016.  The Debtor is
represented by Manuel A. Segarra Vazquez Law Office.  The case is
assigned to Judge Mildred Caban Flores.


FRAC SPECIALISTS: Unsecureds To Recoup Up To 13% Under Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dennis Faulkner, the Chapter 11 Trustee for Frac Specialists, LLC,
Cement Specialists, LLC, and Acid Specialists, LLC, filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas a
disclosure statement dated Dec. 21, 2016, referring to the Debtors'
plan of reorganization.

Class 6 General Unsecured Claims is impaired under the Plan.
Holder will receive a pro rata share of the net liquidating trust
assets, if any, after all allowed claims in Classes 1 through 5 are
satisfied in accordance with the Plan.  For purposes of calculating
each pro rata share, all allowed claims in Class 6 and Class 7 will
be considered classified into one Class.  The timing of the
distribution(s) of net liquidating trust assets will be at the
discretion of the liquidating trustee except to the extent limited
by the express terms of the Plan, the liquidating trust agreement,
or applicable law.  Holders are expected to recover 8-13% of
allowed claim.

The liquidating trust is established under the Plan to administer
the claims against and assets (including causes of action) of the
Debtors' Estates.  There will be one Liquidating Trust to
administer the claims against and assets of all three Debtors, but
management of the liquidating trust assets and distributions from
the Liquidating Trust will be consistent with the terms of the
Liquidating Trust Agreement.  The Liquidating Trust will exist from
and after the Effective Date, with all the powers of a trust under
applicable Texas law.  Within the limits of applicable law, the
Liquidating Trust may be a qualified settlement fund or a grantor
trust for tax purposes, as the Liquidating Trustee determines to be
in the best interest of Creditors and the Estates.  The Liquidating
Trustee will serve as the successor in interest to the Debtors'
Estates pursuant to Section 1123(b)(3) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
and will have all rights and authority to administer claims and
liquidate and distribute the Liquidating Trust Assets for the
benefit of creditors.

On the Effective Date, all assets and liabilities of Frac
Specialists, LLC, Cement Specialists, LLC, and Acid Specialists,
LLC, will be merged into or treated as if they were merged with the
assets and liabilities of Frac Specialists, LLC, and the Debtors
will be substantively consolidated into Frac Specialists, LLC.  Due
to the condition of the records of the Debtors, the Estates of the
Debtors are subject to intercompany Claims that will be difficult
and expensive, if not impossible, to resolve.  The burden of
reconciling these claims will likely outweigh the potential benefit
to some, if not all, of the Creditors of the Debtors.  The Plan
will act as a substantive consolidation of the Estates of the
Debtors.

In connection with, and as a result of the substantive
consolidation of the Debtors' Estates and the Chapter 11 cases, on
the Effective Date: (1) All Intercompany Claims (including claims
arising from the rejection of any executory contract or unexpired
lease) will either be eliminated or will remain in place but will
not be entitled to any distributions under the Plan, (2) any
obligation of any of the Debtors and all guarantees thereof
executed by any of the Debtors will be deemed to be an obligation
of each of the Debtors, (3) any claim filed or asserted against any
of the Debtors will be deemed a claim against each of the Debtors,
(4) for purposes of determining the availability of any right of
setoff under Bankruptcy Code Section 553, when initiated by the
Debtors, the Debtors will be treated as one entity so that the
(subject to the other provisions of Bankruptcy Code Section 553)
debts due to any of the Debtors may be offset against the debts
owed by any of the Debtors, provided however, when initiated by a
creditor setoff rights under Section 553 will be treated as though
any setoff right is valid only against that original Debtor without
the effect of collapsing the transactions into a single entity, and
(5) the Chapter 11 cases of Cement Specialists, LLC, and Acid
Specialists, LLC, may be closed, and any and all proceedings that
were or could have been brought or otherwise commenced in the
Chapter 11 cases of Cement Specialists, LLC, and Acid Specialists,
LLC, whether or not actually brought or commenced, may be
continued, brought or otherwise commenced in the Frac Specialists,
LLC Chapter 11 case.

There will be one Liquidating Trustee, who will be appointed on the
Effective Date in the confirmation court order or as established by
the Liquidating Trust Agreement.

The Liquidating Trustee will collect all funds constituting
Liquidating Trust Assets and, pending distribution, will deposit
funds with a federally insured financial institution that has
banking services.  The Liquidating Trustee will deposit funds so
that they are adequately insured.  Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the Liquidating Trustee may (but is not obligated to) invest all
cash funds received into the Liquidating Trust (including any
earnings thereon or proceeds therefrom) in the same manner as
Chapter 7 trustees are required to invest funds pursuant to the
guidelines of the U.S. Trustee's Office, provided that the
Liquidating Trustee will invest funds held in only demand and time
deposits, like Treasury bills, short-term certificates of deposit
in banks or savings institutions, or other temporary, liquid and
low-risk investments.  The Liquidating Trustee will hold all funds
until they are distributed pursuant to the Plan to creditors with
allowed claims.

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb15-41974-719.pdf

The Plan was filed by the counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee:

     Mark J. Petrocchi, Esq.
     GRIFFITH, JAY & MICHEL, LLP
     2200 Forest Park Boulevard
     Fort Worth, TX 76110
     Tel: (817) 926-2500
     Fax: (817) 926-2505
     E-mail: mpetrocchi@lawgjm.com

                      About Frac Specialists

Frac Specialists, LLC, Cement Specialists, LLC, and Acid
Specialists, LLC, are oilfield service providers serving the
exploration and production industry within the Permian Basin. Noble
Natural Resources, LLC, Javier Urias and Alex Hinojos collectively
own 100% of the membership interests in the Companies.

The Companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Lead Case No. 15-41974), on May 17, 2015.  Larry P. Noble
signed the petitions as manager.

On May 27, 2015, the Court directed the joint administration of the
cases.  The Debtors disclosed $61,675,313 in assets and $57,982,488
in liabilities.

Judge Michael Lynn presides over the cases.  The Debtors tapped
Lynda L. Lankford, Esq., and Jeff P. Prostok, Esq., at Forshey &
Prostok, LLP, as their counsel.  The Debtors hired CBRE, Inc., as
their real estate appraiser.

The U.S. Trustee appointed five creditors to serve on an official
committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee is represented by
Mark E. Andrews, Esq., and Aaron M. Kaufman, Esq., at Dykema Cox
Smith.

Dennis Faulkner has been named the Chapter 11 Trustee for Frac
Specialist, LLC, et al. Mark J. Petrocchi, Esq., of Griffith, Jay &
Michel, LLP, serves as the bankruptcy counsel of the Trustee.


HAGERSTOWN BLOCK: Unsecureds To Recoup 100% Within 180 Days
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Hagerstown Block Company and Hagerstown Concrete Products,
Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Maryland a disclosure statement dated Dec. 20, 2016, referring to
the Debtors' plan of reorganization.

HBC-Class 4 consists of the Allowed General Unsecured Claims
against HBC.  In full and complete satisfaction, discharge and
release of the HBC Class 4 Claims, HBC will pay the holders of
allowed HBC Class 4 Claims an amount equal to 100% of the face
amount of the claims within 180 days after the Effective Date.
HBC-Class 4 claim is impaired by the Plan.

HCP-Class 3 consists of all Allowed General Unsecured Claims.  In
full and complete satisfaction, discharge and release of the HCP
Class 3 Claims, HCP will pay the holders of Allowed HCP Class 3
Claims an amount equal to 100% of the face amount of the claims
within 180 days after the Effective Date.  HCP-Class 3 is impaired
by the Plan.

On the Effective Date, all property of HBC's bankruptcy estate not
otherwise specifically treated under the Plan will become HBC
property.  On the Effective Date, all property of HCP's bankruptcy
estate not otherwise specifically treated under the Plan will
become HCP property.

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb16-19880-72.pdf

The Plan was filed by the Debtors' counsel:

     James A. Vidmar, Esq.
     Lisa Yonka Stevens, Esq.
     YUMKAS, VIDMAR, SWEENEY & MULRENIN, LLC
     10211 Wincopin Circle, Suite 500
     Columbia, Maryland 21044
     Tel: (443) 569-5977
     E-mail: jvidmar@yvslaw.com
             lstevens@yvslaw.com

                About The Hagerstown Block Company

The Hagerstown Block Company and Hagerstown Concrete Products,
Inc., filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Md. Case Nos. 16-19880
and 16-19881), on July 22, 2016.  The petitions were signed by Doy
C. Sneckenberger, president.  The Debtors are represented by James
A. Vidmar, Jr., Esq., at Yumkas, Vidmar, Sweeney & Mulrenin, LLC.
The cases are assigned to Judge Thomas J. Catliota and Judge
Wendelin I. Lipp, respectively.  At the time of filing, each Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.


HARBORVIEW TOWERS: Unsecured Convenience Claimholders May Get 100%
------------------------------------------------------------------
Council of Unit Owners of the 100 Harborview Drive Condominium
filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland a
disclosure statement dated Dec. 21, 2016, referring to the Debtor's
first amended plan of reorganization.

Class 4 consists of the allowed convenience claims consisting of
those allowed unsecured claims aggregating in amount equal to or
less than $25,000.  Holders of allowed Unsecured Claims in excess
of $25,000, that would otherwise be an allowed general unsecured
claim in Class 6, may elect treatment under this Class 4 by making
an election pursuant to Section 5.4.(C) of the Plan.

In full and complete satisfaction, discharge and release of the
Class 4 Allowed Claims in the estimated amount of $218,420.74, the
Debtor will pay each holder 100% of its Allowed Claim, without
interest, within 90 days of the Effective Date.

The purpose of the Plan is to provide a means for the Reorganized
Debtor to continue its operations, maintain the reserve accounts at
a sufficient level to provide for essential repairs, maintenance
and capital improvements to the Debtor's 29-story building with 249
luxury condominium units in Baltimore's Inner Harbor, and provide a
meaningful distribution to all allowed claims.

The Debtor's contributions to the repair and replacement reserve
fund are based on an Oct. 18, 2016 Reserve Study which indicates
that the Debtor's current Reserve Accounts are significantly
underfunded.  The Plan contemplates increasing the reserve
contribution to $400,000 in 2017 with an annual increase of 6% for
30 years.  This will fund all projected short-term and long-term
operating and capital expenditures over the 30-year period.  It
will also moot the proofs of claims filed by certain Unit Owners
because the Reserve Accounts are designed to address regularly
scheduled repair, maintenance and replacement of the common
elements for the benefit of all Unit Owners and to adequately
protect the secured interest of Howard Bank.

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb16-13049-230.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Nov. 8, 2016, the
Debtor filed with the Court a plan of reorganization and
accompanying disclosure statement, which will be funded from: (1)
cash on hand on the Effective Date; (2) the continued collection of
Annual Assessments from Unit Owners; (3) the collection of a
$550,000 Special Assessment from Unit Owners; (4) recoveries from
the pursuit of any claims, rights, or other legal remedies the
Debtor has, or may have in the future; (5) rental income derived
from Units 907 and 1310 and the sale of those units; and (6)
additional principal advancement on the Howard Bank Loan.

               About Council of Unit Owners of the
                100 Harborview Drive Condominium

Council of Unit Owners of the 100 Harborview Drive Condominium, a
condominium association, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 16-13049) on March 9,
2016.
The petition was signed by Dr. Reuben Mezrich, president.  The
Debtor is represented by Paul Sweeny, Esq., at Yumkas, Vidmar,
Sweeney & Mulrenin, LLC.  Judge James F. Schneider is assigned to
the case.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $10
million to $50 million.


HAYDEL PROPERTIES: Hearing on Disclosures Set For Feb. 16
---------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Katharine M. Samson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Mississippi will hold on Feb. 16, 2017, at
1:30 p.m. a hearing to consider the approval of Haydel Properties,
LP's disclosure statement referring to the Debtor's plan of
reorganization filed on Dec. 20, 2016.

Objections to the Disclosure Statement must be filed by Feb. 9,
2017.

                 About Haydel Properties, LP

Haydel Properties, LP, based in Gulfport, Miss., filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case No. 16-51259) on July 27, 2016.

The Hon. Katharine M. Samson presides over the case.  William J.
Little, Jr., Esq., at Lentz & Little, P.A., serves as bankruptcy
counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by Michael
D.
Haydel, manager of general partner.


JOYCE LESLIE: Unsecureds To Recover Up To 6% Under Plan
-------------------------------------------------------
Joyce Leslie, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York an amended disclosure statement
referring to the Debtor's plan of reorganization.

Holders of allowed Class II general unsecured claims stand to
receive a projected distribution of between 3% and 6%, net of
payment of administration claims and priority claims and net of
reserves for post-confirmation expenses and disputed claims.  Class
II general unsecured creditors, however, should be aware that the
Debtor's projections are predicated upon various key assumptions
with respect to the final allowance of priority and unsecured
claims after completion of the objection process.  Accordingly, the
final distribution will not be known until after all claims have
been fully reconciled and all objections have been determined by
the Court.  Nevertheless, the Debtor has spent considerable effort
to develop reasonable projections for this Disclosure Statement
which will be updated and supplemented as events unfold.

The Debtor and the Creditors' Committee urge all Class II general
unsecured creditors to vote to accept the Plan, since a relatively
rapid conclusion of the Chapter 11 case presents the best avenue
for recovery for unsecured creditors and will minimize
administrative expenses and avoid protracted delays.  The
Creditors' Committee expressly supports confirmation of the Plan.

The Plan provides for the resolution, treatment and payment of the
allowed claims against the Debtor from net distributable cash
following the liquidation sales of the Debtor's stores and
collection of other assets.

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb16-22035-390.pdf

                       About Joyce Leslie

Joyce Leslie, Inc., operates a chain of 47 women's retail clothing
stores located throughout New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and
Connecticut.  It filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-22035) on Jan. 9, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Lee Diercks as chief restructuring officer.  The Debtor
disclosed total assets of $7 million and total debts of $9
million.

Judge Robert D. Drain has been assigned the case.

The Debtor has engaged Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP as
counsel, Clear Thinking Group as financial advisor, Oberon
Securities, LLC, as investment advisor, SB Capital Group LLC,
Tiger Capital Group, LLC, and 360 Merchant Solutions, LLC, as
liquidation agents and Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy as claims
and noticing agent.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


K & C LV INVESTMENTS: Equanimity Commits Up to $1.7MM Funding
-------------------------------------------------------------
K & C LV Investments, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Nevada a disclosure statement referring to the
Debtor's plan of reorganization, disclosing that another potential
source of funding is Equanimity, LLC, who has committed between
$900,000 and $1,700,000 and has provided evidence to Debtor of an
ability to secured such funding through a loan to Equanimity's
principal owner, Brian Jian.

Class 3 - PPP 3025 LLC's claim against 2012 North 88th Drive,
Phoenix, Arizona 85037 is impaired under the Plan.  This claim will
be bifurcated into a secured claim and an unsecured claim.  The
allowed secured claim of $50,000 will be reamortized over 30 years
at 5.0% fixed interest per annum.  Monthly payments of $268.41 will
commence on the effective date of the plan and continue for a term
of 30 years (360 months) or until paid in full,
whichever comes first.  All other terms of the note will govern
treatment for this claim.

The unsecured portion of the claim will be reclassified as a
general unsecured claim to be on a pro rata basis with other
members of the general unsecured class.

The Debtors believe that they will have either (A) enough cash on
hand or (B) sufficient cash flow on the effective date of the Plan
to pay all claims and expenses that are entitled to be paid on that
date.

The Debtors' financial projections show that they will have an
aggregate surplus cash flow, after paying operating expenses and
post-confirmation taxes.  The analysis indicates that there will be
sufficient cash flow to pay $400/month (or $1200 per quarter) for a
total of 20 quarters (five years) to pay administrative claims and
to pay into the general unsecured class.  The final plan payments
of these claims are expected to occur about Dec. 5, 2021.

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb16-13605-70.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 5, 2016, the
Debtor filed with the Court a disclosure statement referring to the
Debtor's plan of reorganization.  The Debtor estimated that the
Class 6 General Unsecured Claims against the estate total
approximately $1,896,992.47.  According to that disclosure
statement, the General Unsecured Class would be paid a total of
$13,541.40.  

                   About K & C LV Investments

K & C LV Investments, Inc., based in Las Vegas, Nevada, is a
business which owns two properties.  One property is residential,
and the other is commercial.  The residential investment property
is located at 2012 North 88th Drive, Phoenix, Arizona 85037.  The
2012 North property is presently occupied by a tenant.

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No.
16-13605) on June 30, 2016.  The Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa presides
over the case.  Seth D. Ballstaedt, Esq., at The Ballstaedt Law
Firm, as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $827,210 to $2.69 million in
both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by Wagih
Kamar, president.


K & C LV INVESTMENTS: Hearing on Disclosures Set For Jan. 9
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Carla E. Craig of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York will hold on Jan. 9, 2017, at 2:00
p.m., a hearing to consider the approval of New York Crane &
Equipment Corp., et al.'s amended joint disclosure statement
referring to the Debtors' joint plan of reorganization.

Objections to the Disclosure Statement must be filed no later than
seven days prior to the hearing.

                   About K & C LV Investments

K & C LV Investments, Inc., based in Las Vegas, Nevada, is a
business which owns two properties.  One property is residential,
and the other is commercial.  The residential investment property
is located at 2012 North 88th Drive, Phoenix, Arizona 85037.  The
2012 North property is presently occupied by a tenant.

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No.
16-13605) on June 30, 2016.  The Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa presides
over the case.  Seth D. Ballstaedt, Esq., at The Ballstaedt Law
Firm, as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $827,210 to $2.69 million in
both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by Wagih
Kamar, president.


LINCOLN MEDICAL: Can Use Key Star Cash Collateral on Final Basis
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Andrew B. Altenburg, Jr. of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey authorized Lincoln Medical Supply Company,
LLC, to use the cash collateral of Key Star Capital Fund, L.P., on
a final basis.

Key Star Capital Fund asserted a secured claim against the Debtor
in the amount of $1,351,513 as of the Petition Date.  Key Star
Capital Fund has liens on certain assets of the Debtor as of the
commencement of the case, including the Debtor's accounts,
inventory, and other collateral which is or may result in cash
collateral.

The Debtor and Key Star Capital Fund has agreed that for purposes
of resolving any dispute between them, Key Star Capital Fund will
be allowed a secured claim in the amount of $600,000 and an
unsecured claim in the amount of $751,512.

The Debtor is directed and had agreed to repay the Secured Claim to
Key Star Capital Fund in monthly payments of $5,933, inclusive of
interest payable at the rate of 3.5% per annum, with the first
payment becoming due and payable on January 1, 2017, and continuing
each month through November 1, 2021.  The remaining balance of the
Secured Claim will become immediately due and payable on Dec. 1,
2021.

The Debtor said it does not have sufficient unencumbered cash or
other assets with which to continue to operate its business in
Chapter 11.

The Debtor is authorized to use cash collateral to meet its
ordinary cash needs for the payment of its actual expenses to:

     (a) maintain and preserve its assets;

     (b) continue operation of its business, including but not
limited to payroll and payroll taxes, and insurance expenses; and

     (c) payment of statutory fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section
1930(a)(6).

Key Star Capital Fund is granted a replacement perfected security
interest to the extent that its cash collateral is used by the
Debtor, with the same priority in the Debtor's post-petition
collateral.  Key Star Capital Fund is further granted a
superpriority administrative expense claim, senior to any and all
claims against the Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Final Order, dated Dec. 28, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/LincolnMedical2016_1624206aba_71.pdf

       About Lincoln Medical Supply Company, LLC.

Lincoln Medical Supply Company, LLC, a Pleasantville, New
Jersey-based seller of medical supplies, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 16-24206) on July 25, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Paul Reses, president.  The case is assigned
to Judge Andrew B. Altenburg Jr.  The Debtor is represented by
Scott H. Marcus, Esq., at Scott H. Marcus & Associates.  The Debtor
disclosed total assets at $478,623 and total liabilities at $1.47
million.



MADISON CONSTRUCTION: Cash Collateral Use on Interim Basis OK
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge J. Craig Whitley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of North Carolina authorized Madison Construction Group,
Inc., to use cash collateral on an interim basis, to pay for
expenses incurred prior to Jan. 10, 2017.

The approved Budget provided for total prepetition expenses for
December 2016 in the amount of $642,922, and total postpetition
expenses for December 2016 in the amount of $562,408.

Aquesta Bank and Yadkin Bank assert perfected security interests in
the Debtor's cash collateral.

Although Judge Whitley held that Aquesta Bank and Yadkin Bank's
interest in the cash collateral were adequately protected pursuant
to Section 361 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Banks were granted
replacement lies in the Debtor's postpetition assets to the same
extent and priority ultimately determined to have existed
prepetition for all cash collateral actually expended for the
duration of the Court's Interim Cash Collateral Order.

A further hearing on the use of cash collateral is scheduled on
Jan. 10, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order, dated Dec. 28, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/MadisonConstruction2016_32006_35.pdf

                  About Madison Construction Group

Madison Construction Group, Inc., filed a voluntary petition for
relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.C.
Case No. 16-32006) on Dec. 15, 2016.  The petition was signed by
Christopher Mezzanotte, president.  The Debtor is represented by
Melanie D. Johnson Raubach, Esq. at Hamilton Stephens Steele
Martin, PLLC.  The case is assigned to Judge Craig J. Whitley.  The
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10
million at the time of the filing.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed in this chapter 11 case.


MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATES: Can Use Cash Collateral Until Jan. 31
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Ann M. Nevins of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Connecticut authorized Manufactures Associates, Inc., to use
Nuvo Bank and Trust Company's cash collateral through Jan. 31,
2017.

Judge Nevins acknowledged that it is essential to the Debtor's
business and operations to use cash generated from its
manufacturing business so as to continue to pay ordinary course
business expenses.  She further acknowledged that without court
authority to use the cash collateral, the Debtor will suffer harm
and be forced to terminate operations and abort any chance for
successful reorganization.

Judge Nevins authorized the Debtor, through the Trustee, to use up
to $130,000 for the month of January 2017.  The approved Budget
provides for total expenses in the amount of $128,222 for January
2017.

Nuvo Bank and Trust Company has claimed a duly perfected
non-avoidable security interest in the Debtor's personal and
fixture property, and all goods and equipment.

Nuvo Bank and Trust Company was granted replacement liens in all
after-acquired property of the Debtor, of equal extent and priority
to that which Nuvo Bank and Trust Company enjoyed with regard to
the estate's property as of the Petition Date.

The Debtor was directed to make an adequate protection payment to
Nuvo Bank and Trust Company in the amount of $3,500 for the month
of January.

A hearing on the continued use of cash collateral is scheduled on
January 25, 2017 at 12:00 p.m.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated December 28, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/ManufacturersAssociates2015_1531832_316.pdf

                 About Manufacturers Associates, Inc.

Manufacturers Associates, Inc., based in West Haven, Conn., filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 15-31832) on Nov. 2,
2015.  The petition was signed by Anthony Parillo, Jr., president.


The Debtor was represented by Peter L. Ressler, Esq., at Groob
Ressler & Mulqueen, P.C., and is currently represented by Carl T.
Gulliver, Esq., at Coan, Lewendon, Gulliver & Miltenberger, LLC.
The case is assigned to Judge Julie A. Manning.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor estimated assets at $0 to $50,000 and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.  The United States
Trustee appointed Roberta Napolitano, Esq., as the Chapter 11
Trustee of the Debtor's estate.

The Chapter 11 Trustee retained Blum Shapiro & Co., P.C. as
accountants.


MAXUS ENERGY: Unsecureds To Recoup Up to 25% Under Liquidation Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Maxus Energy Corporation, et al., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware a Chapter 11 plan of liquidation
and accompanying disclosure statement dated December 29, 2016, a
full-text copy of which is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb16-11501-698.pdf

General Unsecured Claims (Class 4) are impaired under the Plan and
are expected to recover 0 to 25%.  Retiree Claims (Class 5) and
Government Environmental Claims (Class 6) are also impaired and
their expected recovery is unknown at the time of filing of the
Plan.

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9019, and prior to Confirmation, the
Debtors will seek the Bankruptcy Court's approval of a settlement
with YPF S.A., parent of YPF Holdings, Inc., which purchased Maxus
in the 1990s.  

On June 15, 2016, the parties reached the settlement of the
Debtors' claims against YPF and its affiliates and executed a
settlement agreement on June 17, 2016, pursuant to which (a) YPF
agreed to pay $130 million to the Debtors and their Estates upon
the satisfaction of certain conditions, and (b) YPF Holdings agreed
to provide debtor-in-possession financing in the amount of $63.1
million to the Debtors, of which $34.35 million is subordinate in
payment to all general unsecured claims.  In exchange, the Debtors
agreed to, among other things, (i) release their claims against the
YPF Entities, and (ii) prosecute the Chapter 11 Cases in accordance
with certain case milestones set forth in the DIP Agreement.   

If the Bankruptcy Court does not enter the YPF Approval Order, any
Claim that was sought to be settled pursuant to the YPF Settlement
will be transferred to the Liquidating Trust and will become
Liquidating Trust Available Assets for prosecution in accordance
with the Liquidating Trust Agreement.  In addition, if the
Bankruptcy Court enters the YPF Approval Order, and subject to the
terms of the order, the Allowed YPF Claims are deemed to be Allowed
Administrative Claims, and all Allowed YPF Claims will be paid in
full and in Cash on the Effective Date, or as soon as practicable
thereafter; provided, however, that the DIP Tranche A Claim and the
DIP Tranche B Claim will receive the treatment set forth in
Articles II.A. and III.E. of the Plan, respectively.

                            *     *     *

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, Bankruptcy Judge
Christopher S. Sontchi agreed to extend Maxus Energy's exclusive
periods for filing a chapter 11 plan and soliciting acceptances to
the plan through January 18, 2017 and March 18, 2017, respectively,
but held that the Exclusive Filing Period will terminate if the
Debtors fail to file an initial Plan by December 31, 2016.

Vince Sullivan, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reported that Maxus
Energy told the Bankruptcy Court during a hearing Dec. 20 that it
would file a Chapter 11 plan by the end of the year as part of a
resolution with creditors who had objected to the company's bid to
have its plan exclusivity period extended for another 60 days.

In a prior report by Mr. Sullivan, Maxus told the Court that an
attempt by creditors to terminate the exclusivity period would
prove to be a disaster for the Chapter 11 process and would derail
the settlement between the Company and its parent company.  Maxus
Energy agreed to release claims against YPF related to toxic
chemical dumping in New Jersey's Passaic River as part of the
deal.

              About Maxus Energy Corporation

Maxus Energy Corporation and four of its subsidiaries filed
voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 (Bankr. D.
Del., Case No. 16-11501) on June 17, 2016. The Debtors intend to
use the breathing spell afforded by the Bankruptcy Code to decide
whether their existing environmental remediation operations and
oil
and gas operations can be restructured as a sustainable,
stand-alone enterprise.

The Debtors have engaged Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as
local counsel, Morrison & Foerster LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel, Zolfo Cooper, LLC as financial advisor and Prime Clerk
LLC
as claims and noticing agent, all are subject to the Bankruptcy
Court's approval.

On July 7, 2016, the United States Trustee for the District of
Delaware filed Notice of Appointment of Committee of Unsecured
Creditors. The Committee selected Schulte Roth & Zabell LLP as
counsel, and Cole Schotz as Delaware co-counsel. Berkeley Research
Group, LLC, serves as financial advisor for the Committee.

The Debtors hired Keen-Summit Capital Partners LLC as real estate
broker.  The Debtors also engaged Hilco Steambank to market and
sell their internet protocol numbers and other internet number
resources, and EnergyNet.com to market and sell the Debtors'
rights, title, and interest in and to the oil and gas properties.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, appointed the
following to a committee of retirees: John Leslie Jackson, Sr.,
Gerald G. Carlton, and Robert E. Garbesi.


ML HOSPITALITY: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of ML
Hospitality, Inc. at a hearing on Jan. 31.

The hearing will be held at 2:00 p.m., at the Old U.S. Post Office
Building, Courtroom No. 1, 3rd Floor, 615 E. Houston St., San
Antonio, Texas.

The court had earlier approved the ML Hospitality's disclosure
statement, allowing the company to start soliciting votes from
creditors.  

The Dec. 20 order set a Jan. 25 deadline for creditors to cast
their votes and file their objections.

Under the proposed plan, unsecured creditors will recover 10% of
their allowed claims through equal semi-annual installments over
three years.  These creditors will earn interest at 1% per annum.

                       About ML Hospitality

ML Hospitality, Inc. operates a Red Roof Inn in San Antonio, Tex.
The company filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No.
16-51282) on June 6, 2016.  The petition was signed by Mohammed N.
Alam, president.  

William R. Davis, Jr., Esq., at Langley & Banack, Inc., represents
the Debtor.  The case is assigned to Judge Ronald B. King.

At the time of the filing the Debtor estimated its assets at
$50,001 to $100,000 and liabilities at $100,001 to $500,000.


OAKS OF PRAIRIE: Cash Collateral Use Through Jan. 31 OK
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas M. Lynch of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Illinois authorized The Oaks of Prairie Point
Condominium to use Illinois State Bank's cash collateral on an
interim basis, through Jan. 31, 2017.

The approved Budget projected total expenses in the amount of
$45,453 for the month of January.

The Debtor was directed to pay Illinois State Bank $10,729 on or
before Jan. 15, 2017.  The payment will be credited to the Debtor's
loan.

Illinois State Bank is granted a valid and perfected, enforceable
security interest in and to the Debtor's postpetition accounts,
assessments and other receivables which have or may become property
of the estate, to the extent and priority of its alleged
prepetition liens.

The Debtor is directed, among other things, to maintain and pay
premiums for insurance to cover all of its assets from fire, theft,
and water damage.

A status hearing on the Debtor's Motion is scheduled on Jan. 25,
2017 at 10:30 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order, dated Dec. 28, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/OaksofPrairie2016_1680238_87.pdf

                     About The Oaks of Prairie Point
                         Condominium Association

The Oaks of Prairie Point Condominium Association is an Illinois
corporation that owns and operates condominium buildings located in
Lake in the Hills, Illinois, known as "The Oaks of Prairie Point
Condominium".  

The Oaks of Prairie Point Condominium sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.
16-80238) on Feb. 3, 2016.  The petition was signed by Donna Smith,
property manager.  The case is assigned to Judge Thomas M. Lynch.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10
million at the time of the filing.

The Debtor is represented by Thomas W. Goedert, Esq., at Crane,
Heyman, Simon, Welch & Clar, in Chicago, Illinois.


OFF THE BOAT: Wants to Use Everett Co-Operative Bank Cash
---------------------------------------------------------
Off the Boat, Incorporated, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts for authorization to use cash
collateral.

The Debtor owns and operates a seafood restaurant in Revere,
Massachusetts.

Everett Co-Operative Bank is the present holder of the first lien
on substantially all of the Debtor's assets.  The Debtor is
indebted to Everett Co-Operative Bank in the amount of $48,000.

The Debtor's principal assets are equipment, fixtures, inventory
and receivables.  The Debtor believes that the collateral has a
value of approximately $40,000.

The Debtor contends that it is necessary for it to make use of the
income in order to maintain and preserve the value of its business.
The Debtor further contends that without the use of cash
collateral to maintain the Debtor's business, to service debt, to
pay usual and ordinary operating expenses of the Debtor's cab, the
value of the Debtor's business is certain to diminish.

As adequate protection, the Debtor proposes to:

     (1) maintain insurance on the property;

     (2) grant to Everett Co-Operative Bank a replacement lien on
the same types of post-petition property of the estate against
which it held as of December 27, 2016, the petition date; and

     (3) to continue making payments consistent with its proposed
budget, on a monthly basis.

The Debtor's proposed Budget for the period December 27, 2017
through January 31, 2017, provides for total expenses in the amount
of $55,529.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated December 28, 2016,
is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/OfftheBoat2016_1614841_6.pdf

Off the Boat is represented by:

          John F. Sommerstein, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF JOHN F. SOMMERSTEIN
          98 North Washington Street, Suite 104
          Boston, MA 02114
          Telephone: (617) 523-7474
          Email: jfsommer@aol.com

Everett Co-Operative Bank can be reached at:

          EVERETT CO-OPERATIVE BANK
          419 Broadway
          Everett, MA 02149

                   About Off the Boat, Incorporated

Off the Boat, Incorporated, which owns and operates a seafood
restaurant in Revere, MA, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Mass. Case No. 16-14841-MSH) on Dec. 27, 2016.  The Debtor is
represented by John F. Sommerstein, Esq., at the Law Office of John
F. Sommerstein.



PAC RECYCLING: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: PAC Recycling, LLC
        PO Box 2633
        Eugene, OR 97402

Case No.: 17-60001

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 2, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Oregon

Judge: Hon. Thomas M Renn

Debtor's Counsel: Loren S. Scott, Esq.
                  THE SCOTT LAW GROUP
                  2350 Oakmont Way, Ste. 106
                  Eugene, OR 97401
                  Tel: 541-868-8005
                  E-mail: ecf@scott-law-group.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Rodney M. Schultz, member.

A copy of the Debtor's list of two unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/orb17-60001.pdf


PEABODY ENERGY: More Noteholders Join Backstop, Placement Deals
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peabody Energy on Dec. 29, 2016, said it has materially increased
the consensus among creditor classes in recent days in support of
the company's plan of reorganization.  Following discussions with
certain other creditors, the company also has reached agreement
with the creditor co-proponents of the plan to extend the deadline
for holders of the company's senior secured second lien notes and
senior unsecured notes to become parties to the Plan Support
Agreement (PSA) and to join the Backstop Commitment Agreement (BCA)
relating to the proposed $750 million common stock rights offering
and the Private Placement Agreement (PPA) relating to the proposed
private placement of $750 million of mandatorily convertible
preferred stock as Phase Two parties.

The Phase Two deadline has been extended by 48 hours, and the new
deadline is 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on Dec. 30, 2016.

As of Dec. 28, 2016, additional holders of approximately 25% of the
outstanding principal amount of the company's senior secured second
lien notes and approximately 25% of the outstanding principal
amount of the company's senior unsecured notes became parties to
the PSA, BCA and PPA.

When combined with the holdings of the creditors initially party to
the PSA, BCA and PPA, holders of approximately 38% of the company's
outstanding first lien debt are parties to the PSA, and holders of
approximately 65% of the outstanding principal amount of the
company's senior secured second lien notes and 65% of the
outstanding principal amount of the company's senior unsecured
notes are parties to each of the PSA, BCA and PPA.

"We are very pleased by the substantial incremental support our
plan has received over the past few days," said Peabody Energy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Amy B.
Schwetz. "The plan has gained significant additional consensus
among Peabody’s senior bondholders as we continue to move toward
confirmation."

In addition, the company notes that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri has entered an order that allows
specified holders of approximately 12% of the outstanding principal
amount of the company's senior secured second lien notes and
approximately 7% of the outstanding principal amount of the
company's senior unsecured notes to become Phase Two parties under
the BCA and PPA if they submit joinders to the PSA, BCA and PPA on
or prior to 3:00 p.m., New York City time, on Jan. 6, 2017.

The plan of reorganization is subject to confirmation by the court,
and the related disclosure statement is subject to approval by the
court.

                           *     *     *

On Dec. 21, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court approved a stipulation filed
by the Company relating to an amendment to the DIP Final Order.
The Stipulation amends the Final DIP Order to extend the Adequate
Protection Milestones (as defined in the DIP Final Order) related
to the Debtors' continued use of Cash Collateral (as defined in the
DIP Final Order), including an extension of the date on which the
Debtors must file a plan of reorganization and related disclosure
statement to Dec. 22, 2016.  As a result, the Company was required
to file with the Bankruptcy Court a plan of reorganization and
disclosure statement with respect thereto by Dec. 22.

On Dec. 22, 2016, the Debtors filed a Joint Plan of Reorganization
and a related Disclosure Statement.  Pursuant to the Plan,
Reorganized PEC will use reasonable best efforts to cause
Reorganized PEC's common stock and Preferred Equity to be listed on
the New York Stock Exchange as soon as practicable after the
effective date of the Plan.  The Plan also provides for a long-term
incentive plan for management and employees of Reorganized PEC,
including reservation of an amount of Reorganized PEC Common Stock
for the LTIP.  The Plan contemplates a nine member Board of
Directors of Reorganized PEC, to be comprised of Reorganized PEC's
Chief Executive Officer and at least one other independent director
to be chosen by Peabody Energy.  Three significant creditors or
creditor groups will each select an independent director for
appointment to the Reorganized PEC Board, and a search process
described in the Plan Term Sheet will be conducted to select four
additional independent directors.

The Debtors have an exclusive period to solicit and obtain
acceptances of the Plan through and including March 17, 2017.  It
is possible that the Plan as filed may be challenged and undergo
substantial revision prior to the time that it is submitted to the
Debtors' creditors for a vote.

Terms of the Plan were reported in the Dec. 23 and 28 editions of
the Troubled Company Reporter.

A hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement will be
held on Jan. 26, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., Central Time.  Objections
are due Jan. 20.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Dec. 22, 2016,
is available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb16-42529-1821.pdf

On Dec. 23, 2016, the Company filed a motion with the Bankruptcy
Court seeking authority to enter into a plan support agreement with
certain of its lenders and noteholders to effect an agreed upon
restructuring of the Debtors' obligations embodied in the Plan.
The Debtors have requested that the Bankruptcy Court hear the PSA
Motion at the hearing currently scheduled for Jan. 26, 2017.

In accordance with the Plan, the Company has agreed to conduct a
private placement pursuant to the private placement agreement,
dated as of December 22, 2016, among the Company and certain of the
Company's creditors.  Pursuant to the Private Placement Agreement,
the Private Placement Parties will have the right and obligation to
purchase $750 million in the aggregate of newly created mandatory
convertible preferred stock of the reorganized company in a private
placement exempt from registration pursuant to section 4(a)(2) of
the Securities Act of 1933.  The Debtors will seek approval of the
Private Placement and the Private Placement Agreement as part of
the PSA Motion at the PSA Hearing.

On Dec. 28, 2016, the Company and the Private Placement Parties
entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Private Placement Agreement to
extend the deadline for certain of the Company's creditors to
become a Phase Two Private Placement Party (as defined in the
Private Placement Agreement) to 5:00 p.m. New York City time on
Dec. 30, 2016.

In accordance with the Plan, (i) the Company also has agreed to
conduct a $750 million rights offering to eligible creditors for
shares of common stock of Reorganized PEC and (ii) the Rights
Offering will be 100% backstopped by certain of the Company's
noteholders, in each case on the terms and subject to the
conditions described in the term sheet for the Plan and pursuant to
the backstop commitment agreement, dated as of Dec. 22, 2016, among
the Company and the Commitment Parties.  The Debtors will seek
approval of the Rights Offering and the Backstop Commitment
Agreement as part of the PSA Motion at the PSA Hearing.

The rights to purchase shares of common stock of Reorganized PEC in
the Rights Offering, any shares issued upon exercise thereof, and
all shares issued to the Commitment Parties pursuant to the
Backstop Commitment Agreement will be issued in reliance upon an
exemption from registration under the Securities Act provided by
Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code, Section 4(a)(2) of the
Securities Act and/or Regulation D thereunder.

On Dec. 28, 2016, the Company and the Commitment Parties entered
into Amendment No. 1 to the Backstop Commitment Agreement to extend
the deadline for certain of the Company's creditors to become a
Phase Two Commitment Party (as defined in the Backstop Commitment
Agreement) to 5:00 p.m. New York City time on Dec. 30, 2016.

The non-Debtor parties to the Amended Backstop Agreement and
Amended Private Placement Agreement are:

     -- Contrarian Capital Fund I, L.P.
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           Investment Manager
           Jon Bauer
           Managing Member

        notice to:

           Josh Weisser
           411 West Putnam Avenue, Suite 425
           Greenwich, CT 06830
           E-mail: jweisser@contrariancapital.com

     -- CCM Pension-A, L.L.C.
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           Managing Member

     -- CCM Pension-B, L.L.C.
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           Managing Member

     -- Contrarian Dome du Gouter Master Fund, LP
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           Investment Manager

     -- Contrarian Opportunity Fund, L.P.
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           Investment Manager

     -- Contrarian Capital Senior Secured, L.P.
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           Investment Manager

     -- Contrarian Capital Trade Claims, L.P.
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           Investment Manager

     -- Contrarian Advantage-B, LP
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           General Partner

     -- Contrarian Emerging Markets, L.P.
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           Investment Manager

     -- Contrarian EM SIF Master L.P.
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           Investment Manager

     -- Boston Patriot Summer St LLC
        by Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C.
           Investment Manager

     -- BlockHouse Master Fund LP

        by Alfred J. Barbagallo
           Managing Director & General Counsel
           40 West 57th Street, 25th Floor
           New York, NY 10019
           E-mail: Compliance@pointstate.com

     -- Conflux Fund LP
        by Alfred J. Barbagallo
           Managing Director & General Counsel

     -- SteelMill Master Fund LP
        by Alfred J. Barbagallo
           Managing Director & General Counsel

     -- PointState Fund LP
        by Alfred J. Barbagallo
           Managing Director & General Counsel

     -- Panning Master Fund, LP
        by Panning Capital Management, LP
           Investment Manager
           William Kelly
           Authorized Signatory

           Attn: Rayan Joshi
           510 Madison Avenue, 23rd Floor
           New York, NY 10022
           E-mail: rayan@panning.com

     -- SOUTH DAKOTA INVESTMENT COUNCIL
        by Matthew L. Clark
           State Investment Officer
           South Dakota Investment Council

           Attn: A. Laurie Riss
           4009 West 49th Street, Suite 300
           Sioux Falls, SD 57106-3784
           Tel: 605-362-2820
           E-mail: Laurie.Riss@state.sd.us

     -- DISCOVERY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
        by Adam Schreck
           General Counsel

           20 Marshall Street, Suite 310
           South Norwalk, CT 06854
           Attn: Adam Schreck
           E-mail: aschreck@discap.com
           Tel: (203) 956-7953

     -- BLUE TURTLE CAPITAL, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company
        Elliot Greenberg, Vice President

        Notice to:

        Kenneth H. Eckstein, Esq.,
        Stephen D. Zide, Esq.,
        Andrew M. Dove, Esq.
        Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
        1177 Avenue of the Americas
        New York, NY 10036
        E-mail: KEckstein@kramerlevin.com;
               SZide@kramerlevin.com
               ADove@kramerlevin.com

     -- AURELIUS CAPITAL MASTER, LTD.
        by Aurelius Capital Management, LP, solely as
           investment manager and not in its individual capacity

           Richard Petrilli, Chief Financial Officer
           ACP MASTER, LTD.

       Notice to:

        Kenneth H. Eckstein, Esq.,
        Stephen D. Zide, Esq.,
        Andrew M. Dove, Esq.
        Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
        1177 Avenue of the Americas
        New York, NY 10036
        E-mail: KEckstein@kramerlevin.com;
                SZide@kramerlevin.com
                ADove@kramerlevin.com

On Dec. 13, 2016, Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC, a subsidiary of
Peabody Energy Corporation, was issued an imminent danger order
under Section 107(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of
1977.  The mine involved was the Wildcat Hills Underground Mine
located in Saline County, Illinois.  On that date, an inspector
from the Mine Safety and Health Administration alleged that a miner
was working on a shorted battery without wearing all the proper
protective gear.  The work was ceased immediately and the order was
terminated without injury to any employees or damage to any
equipment.

                         Business Updates

On May 18, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court entered a final order
approving a Superpriority Secured Debtor-in-Possession Credit
Agreement, dated April 18, 2016, between the Company, as borrower,
Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent and the lender parties
thereto.  The Debtors agreed to provide the lenders under the DIP
Credit Agreement with comprehensive five-year business plans for
their United States and Australian operations and a five-year
consolidated business plan encompassing the entire enterprise.

The Company has updated aspects of its financial projections
previously included in the Business Plan to incorporate changes
driven by recent pricing improvements, which impact the Company's
near-term industry views, financial performance and outlook.  The
Updates were created using estimates and assumptions developed in
October 2016.

In November 2016, the Company provided the Updates to the
Confidentiality Agreement Signatories.  

Financial information included in the Updates was not prepared with
a view toward compliance with the published guidelines of the
Securities and Exchange Commission or the guidelines established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding
projections or forecasts.  The financial information does not
purport to present the Company's financial condition in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The Company's independent accountants have not examined, compiled
or otherwise applied procedures to the financial information and,
accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of
assurance with respect to the financial information.

In connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company became a party
to Adversary Proceeding No. 16-04068-399, which relates, among
other things, to disputes arising under or relating to the Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 24, 2013, between
the Company, as borrower, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent
and the lender parties thereto.

On May 20, 2016, the Debtors filed a motion with the Bankruptcy
Court requesting that the court enter an order directing all
parties to the Adversary Proceeding to participate in non-binding
mediation for purposes of attempting to resolve the disputes that
are the subject of the Adversary Proceeding and on June 20, 2016
the Bankruptcy Court entered such an order.  In connection with the
Mediation, the Company entered into confidentiality agreements with
certain of its lenders and other holders of Company debt pursuant
to which the Company agreed to publicly disclose certain
information no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on
December 22, 2016.

In accordance with the provisions of the Confidentiality
Agreements, the Company has disclosed that, in addition to the
Updates, on December 19, 2016, the Company also provided to the
Confidentiality Agreement Signatories supplemental materials
regarding the Company's cash position and illustrative sources and
uses of cash relating to the proposed Plan, and on December 20,
2016, the Company provided to the Confidentiality Agreement
Signatories materials regarding intercompany debt.

A copy of the Plan Support Agreement is available at
https://is.gd/iOxao7

A copy of the original Private Placement Agreement is available at
https://is.gd/CUykuR

A copy of the original Backstop Commitment Agreement is available
at https://is.gd/8Hqf2v

A copy of the Plan Term Sheet is available at https://is.gd/gGj4Ye

A copy of the 2016-2021 Business Updates is available at
https://is.gd/4PH3ko

A copy of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Discussion is available
at https://is.gd/ZX899J

A copy of the Supplemental Materials is available at
https://is.gd/00Ov4p

A copy of the Intercompany Debt Materials is available at
https://is.gd/L2PqZ1

                About Peabody Energy Corporation

Headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, Peabody Energy Corporation
claims to be the world's largest private-sector coal company.  As
of Dec. 31, 2014, the Company owned interests in 26 active coal
mining operations located in the United States (U.S.) and
Australia.  The Company has a majority interest in 25 of those
mining operations and a 50% equity interest in the Middlemount
Mine
in Australia.  In addition to its mining operations, the Company
markets and brokers coal from other coal producers, both as
principal and agent, and trade coal and freight-related contracts
through trading and business offices in Australia, China, Germany,
India, Indonesia, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the U.S.

Peabody posted a net loss of $1.988 billion for 2015, wider from
the net loss of $777 million in 2014 and the $513 million net loss
in 2013.

At Dec. 31, 2015, the Company had total assets of $11.02 billion
against $10.1 billion in total liabilities, and stockholders'
equity of $919 million.

On April 13, 2016, Peabody Energy Corp. and 153 affiliates filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code.  The 154 cases are pending joint
administration before the Honorable Judge Barry S. Schermer under
(Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 16-42529).

As of the Petition Date, PEC has approximately $4.3 billion in
outstanding secured debt obligations and $4.5 billion in
outstanding unsecured debt obligations.

The Debtors tapped Jones Day as general counsel; Armstrong,
Teasdale LLP as local counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC and
investment banker Lazard PTY Limited as investment banker; FTI
Consulting, Inc., as financial advisors; and Kurtzman Carson
Consultants, LLC, as claims, ballot and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 29, 2016, appointed seven
creditors of Peabody Energy Corp. to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained Morrison
& Foerster LLP as counsel, Spencer Fane LLP as local counsel,
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as conflicts counsel,
Blackacre LLC as its independent expert, and Berkeley Research
Group, LLC, as financial advisor.


PERFORMANCE SPORTS: UST Balks at Houlihan Lokey's Fee Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew R. Vara, the Acting United States Trustee for Region 3,
objects to the request of the Official Committee of Equity Security
Holders of BPS U.S. Holdings, Inc., et al., for authority to retain
Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as Financial Advisor and Investment
Banker, Nunc Pro Tunc to November 28, 2016.

The U.S. Trustee tells the Court that Houlihan Lokey seeks to
require the Debtors' estates to reimburse the fees and
disbursements of its legal counsel in the event of any fee dispute
or objection to its fees by any party in these jointly administered
cases.  The U.S. Trustee contends that the Fee Defense Provisions
do not require that any fee dispute or objection to Houlihan
Lokey's fees be resolved in Houlihan Lokey's favor.

According to the U.S. Trustee, the Fee Defense Provisions violate
the Bankruptcy Code and the so-called American Rule, ignore the
express directives of the United States Supreme Court, and are
otherwise unreasonable.

The U.S. Trustee explains that the U.S. Supreme Court held that
section 330(a) does not authorize a court to approve a law firm's
fee for litigating its fee application.  Baker Botts LLP v. ASARCO
LLC, ___ U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 2158 (2015).  In ASARCO, the Court
stated that the "basic point of reference when considering the
award of attorney's fees is the bedrock principle known as the
American Rule: Each litigant pays his own attorney's fees, win or
lose, unless a statute or contract provides otherwise."

For six separate and independent reasons, Houlihan Lokey cannot
circumvent ASARCO by having the same fees approved as a term or
condition of its employment under section 328(a), the U.S. Trustee
says.  Unless the Fee Defense Provisions are removed or stricken,
the Bankruptcy Court should deny the Retention Application.

The Retention Application and Engagement letter provide for the
Debtors' estates to pay Houlihan Lokey a fixed fee of $2.5 million
plus a monthly fee of $125,000.  The firm also seeks payment of a
Deferred Fee.  Specifically, the Engagement Letter provides that
the Debtors will pay Houlihan Lokey a Deferred Fee to be paid in
cash of $2,500,000.  The Deferred Fee shall be earned upon the
consummation of a "Transaction", and payable at the closing
thereof.  

According to the U.S. Trustee, the Engagement Letter defines
"transaction" in such broad terms that payment of the $2.5 million
Deferred Fee is a virtual certainty, regardless of benefit to the
Debtors' estates or shareholders.  Short of dismissal, the
engagement and payment thereunder appear to be risk-free for
Houlihan Lokey.

"No Deferred Fee in any amount should be payable to Houlihan Lokey
except upon demonstration of value added for the benefit of equity
security holders. Even then, the Deferred Fee should be
proportionate to the added value for shareholders lest Houlihan
Lokey's fees drain the estate of wealth that should be preserved
for the benefit of shareholders," the U.S. Trustee says.

                         *     *     *

On Dec. 28, 2016, Performance Sports Group Ltd. (OTC: PSGLQ)
provided a bi-weekly status update in accordance with its
obligations under the alternative information guidelines set out in
National Policy 12-203 - Cease Trade Orders for Continuous
Disclosure Defaults.  The Company is subject to a management cease
trade order issued by the Ontario Securities Commission, the
Company's principal regulator in Canada, in connection with the
delayed filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K, including its
annual audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended May
31, 2016 and the related management's discussion and analysis, and
the Company advised that (i) there have been no material changes to
the information relating to the delayed filing of its Annual
Filings, (ii) it intends to continue to comply with the alternative
information guidelines of NP 12-203; (iii) except as previously
disclosed, there are no subsequent specified defaults (actual or
anticipated) within the meaning of NP 12-203; and (iv) there is no
other material information concerning the Company and its affairs
that has not been generally disclosed.

                    About Performance Sports

Exeter, N.H.-based Performance Sports Group Ltd. (NYSE: PSG) (TSX:
PSG) -- http://www.PerformanceSportsGroup.com/-- is a developer   

and manufacturer of ice hockey, roller hockey, lacrosse, baseball
and softball sports equipment, as well as related apparel and
soccer apparel. Its products are marketed under the BAUER,
MISSION, MAVERIK, CASCADE, INARIA, COMBAT and EASTON brand names
and are distributed by sales representatives and independent
distributors throughout the world. In addition, the Company
distributes its hockey products through its Burlington,
Massachusetts and Bloomington, Minnesota Own The Moment Hockey
Experience retail stores.

On Oct. 31, 2016, Performance Sports Group Ltd. and certain of its
affiliates have filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the District of Delaware and commenced
proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

The U.S. Debtors are: BPS US Holdings Inc.; Bauer Hockey, Inc.;
Easton Baseball/Softball Inc.; Bauer Hockey Retail Inc.; Bauer
Performance Sports Uniforms Inc.; Performance Lacrosse Group Inc.;
BPS Diamond Sports Inc.; and PSG Innovation Inc.

The Canadian Debtors are: Performance Sports Group Ltd.; KBAU
Holdings Canada, Inc.; Bauer Hockey Retail Corp.; Easton Baseball
/Softball Corp.; PSG Innovation Corp. Bauer Hockey Corp.; BPS
Canada Intermediate Corp.; BPS Diamond Sports Corp.; Bauer
Performance Sports Uniforms Corp.; and Performance Lacrosse Group
Corp.

The Debtors have hired Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
as counsel; Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as co-counsel;
Stikeman Elliott LLP as Canadian legal counsel; Centerview LLP as
investment banker to the special committee; Alvarez & Marsal North
America, LLC, as restructuring advisor; Joele Frank, Wilkinson,
Brimmer, Katcher as communications & relations advisor; KPMG LLP as
auditors; Ernst & Young LLP as CCAA monitor; and Prime Clerk LLC as
notice, claims, solicitation and balloting agent.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, appointed three
creditors of BPS US Holdings, Inc., parent of Performance Sports,
to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors.  The
Creditors' Committee retained by Blank Rome LLP as counsel, Cassels
Brock & Blackwell LLP as Canadian co-counsel, and Province Inc. as
financial advisor.

The U.S. Trustee also appointed a committee of equity security
holders.  The equity committee is represented by Natalie D. Ramsey,
Esq., and Mark A. Fink, Esq., at Montgomery, McCracken, Walker &
Rhoads, LLP; and Robert J. Stark, Esq., Steven B. Levine, Esq.,
James W. Stoll, Esq., and Andrew M. Carty, Esq., at Brown Rudnick
LLP.

                           *     *     *

The Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware and the Ontario
Superior Court of Justice have granted the Company approval of,
among other things, the bidding procedures and "stalking horse"
bid protections in connection with a "stalking horse" asset
purchase
agreement, under which an acquisition vehicle to be co-owned by an
affiliate of Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. and Fairfax Financial
Holdings Limited, intends to acquire substantially all of the
assets of the Company and its North American subsidiaries for U.S.
$575 million in aggregate and assume related operating
liabilities.

Interested parties must submit qualified bids to acquire
substantially all of the assets of the Company no later than
January 25, 2017.  The auction is set for Jan. 30, 2017.  A
final sale approval hearing is expected to take place shortly
after completion of the auction with the anticipated closing of
the
successful bid to occur by the end of February 2017, subject to
receipt of applicable regulatory approvals and the satisfaction or
waiver of other customary closing conditions.


QUINTESS LLC: Can Get Postpetition Loan, Use Cash on Final Basis
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado authorized
Quintess, LLC, to use cash collateral and obtain postpetition loans
on a final basis, pursuant to a Stipulation and Budget.

As previously reported in the Troubled Company Reporter, the Debtor
is wholly owned by Vacation Group, LLC, which is wholly owned by
its Lender.  The Debtor owes its Lender $2,662,500 plus accrued
interest, fees and costs.  The Debtor granted the Lender a lien and
security interest upon substantially all of the Debtor's assets as
security for its obligations.

The Debtor related that it had executed a Stipulation with the
Lender, wherein the Lender agreed to advance the principal sum of
$337,500 after Oct. 7, 2016 on a secured basis.

The relevant terms of the Stipulation are:

     (1) Postpetition Loans:

          (a) Amount: $337,500

          (b) Maturity: May 31, 2021

          (c) Interest Rate: 8% per annum

          (d) Security:  The Post-petition Loans will be secured by
a first priority security interest and lien upon all prepetition
and postpetition assets and property of the Debtor, senior to any
existing security interest or lien upon such assets and property.

     (2) Use of Cash Collateral: The Debtor will be authorized to
use cash collateral upon the following terms and conditions:

          (a) All Cash Collateral will be deposited, upon receipt,
in appropriate debtor in possession bank accounts or prepetition
bank accounts which the Debtor has been authorized to maintain by
the Court or the United States Trustee.  The Debtor will provide
the Lender with the identity and location of all debtor in
possession bank accounts and any pre-petition bank accounts which
the Debtor has been authorized to maintain by the Court or the
United States Trustee.

          (b) The Debtor will be entitled to the use of the Cash
Collateral to pay the reasonable, ordinary, and necessary expenses
of operating and maintaining its business.

     (3) Adequate Protection of Lender's Interests:

          (a) The Lender is granted a replacement lien upon all
postpetition assets of the Debtor's estate to the same extent,
validity and priority of the Lender's prepetition liens upon and
security interests in the Debtor's assets and to the extent of the
diminution in the value of the prepetition Collateral.

          (b) If the replacement lien is insufficient to satisfy in
full the claims of the Lender, the Lender will be granted a
superpriority allowed claim under Section 503(b) of the Bankruptcy
Code in the amount of any such insufficiency.
   
     (4) Carve-Out: The Lender's liens and security interests will
be subject and subordinate to a carve-out for all allowed
professional fees and disbursements of professionals retained, and
quarterly fees to be paid pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1930(a)(6)
and any fees payable to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court.

A full-text copy of the Final Order, dated Dec. 28, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/QuintessLLC2016_1619955jgr_173.pdf

                        About Quintess, LLC.

Quintess, LLC, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Colo. Case
No. 16-19955) on Oct. 7, 2016.  The petition was signed by Pete
Estler, CEO.  The Debtor is represented by Duncan E. Barber, Esq.,
at Shapiro Bieging Barber Otteson LLP and Ron Bender, Esq., at
Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP.  The case is assigned to
Judge Joseph G. Rosania, Jr.  The Debtor estimated assets at $0 to
$50,000 and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

The U.S. Trustee appointed the following creditors to serve on the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors: Luciano Tauro, John L.
Stanfill III, Mary Ann Remick, Jason D. Greenman, John (Jack)
Daggitt, and James W. Packer.  The Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors is represented by John F. Young, Esq., at Markus Williams
Young & Zimmermann LLC, and William R. Baldiga, Esq., at Brown
Rudnick LLP.  The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
retained Gray & Company LLC as financial advisor, and Kurtzman
Carson Consultants, LLC as communications agent.


RESCUE ONE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Rescue One Ambulance
        15540 Texaco Avenue
        Paramount, CA 90723

Case No.: 17-10002

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 1, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Judge: Hon. Barry Russell

Debtor's Counsel: Michael Jay Berger, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL JAY BERGER
                  9454 Wilshire Blvd 6th Fl
                  Beverly Hills, CA 90212-2929
                  Tel: 310-271-6223
                  Fax: 310-271-9805
                  E-mail: michael.berger@bankruptcypower.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Andrew Boulos, president.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-10002.pdf


ROUST CORPORATION: To Seek Approval of Prepack Plan on Jan. 6
-------------------------------------------------------------
Prepetition, Roust Corporation and its subsidiaries solicited votes
on their Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization, and
have received overwhelming support for the Plan.  Accordingly, the
Debtors have requested a combined hearing for approval of the
offering memorandum and disclosure statement and confirmation of
the Plan, to be held on Jan. 6, 2017, as well as deadlines
associated with the requested combined hearing.

Solicitation of votes on the Plan began on Dec. 1, 2016.  Voting on
the Plan closed on Dec. 30, 2016.  According to the official vote
tabulation prepared by Roust's voting and information agent,
creditors have voted overwhelmingly to accept the Plan.  In
particular, the Plan was accepted by approximately 100% in number
and 100% in amount of Existing Senior Secured Notes that were voted
on the Plan.  The Plan also was accepted by approximately 100% in
number and 100% in amount of Existing Convertible Notes that were
voted on the Plan.  Moreover, participation in the Plan vote by
holders of Existing Notes was extraordinarily high, with
approximately 90% of all holders of Existing Senior Secured Notes
and approximately 93% of all holders of Existing Convertible Notes
voting, as disclosed in Court documents.

"I believe that such a combined hearing in these chapter 11 cases
would promote judicial economy and the expedient reorganization of
the Debtors.  Any adverse effects of the chapter 11 filings upon
the Debtors' businesses and going concern value will be minimized,
and the benefit to creditors maximized, through prompt
distributions and the reduction of administrative expenses of the
estate - which are the hallmarks of a prepackaged plan of
reorganization," said Grant Winterton, chief executive officer of
Roust Corporation.

The Debtors are also requesting that the Court, under Section
341(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, order the Office of the United
States Trustee not convene a meeting of creditors or equity
security holders in these Chapter 11 cases.

            Assumption of the RSA, Backstop Agreement

On Nov. 9, 2016, the Debtors entered into a restructuring support
agreement and term sheet with holders of 90% in aggregate principal
amount of the existing senior secured notes and holders of
approximately two-thirds in aggregate principal amount of the
existing convertible notes, and Russian Standard Bank, Roust
Trading Ltd. and Mr. Roustam Tariko.

Pursuant to the RSA, the Plan Support Parties agreed to compromise
their debts and contribute extensive new value to the Reorganized
Debtors.

"I believe that the assumption of the RSA ensures that the
agreement that forms the foundation for the Debtors' consensual
restructuring continues to be valid and enforceable against all
signatories and to provide the Debtors with the benefits they
bargained for thereunder.  The RSA not only requires the parties to
vote in favor of the Plan, but prohibits such parties from opposing
confirmation of the Plan or the approval of the Disclosure
Statement, in each case subject to the terms of the RSA," said Mr.
Winterton.

The RSA outlines the Proposed Restructuring and provides the
framework and support for the Plan which, if effectuated, will
strengthen the Reorganized Debtors' capitalization by over $500
million, deleverage their balance sheet by at least $462 million,
result in funding of $55 million in new equity capital and result
in the contribution to Reorganized Roust of strategic assets,
namely RSV, and related intellectual property with an estimated
value of between $510 million and $570 million.  The Debtors'
Proposed Restructuring will immediately provide greater value to
all of the Debtors' stakeholders by positioning Reorganized Roust
for accelerated revenue and profit growth within the global alcohol
market.  The Proposed Restructuring will enable Roust Corporation
to more effectively execute its business strategy and take
advantage of growth opportunities worldwide to ensure that it is
well positioned for an initial public offering of its stock within
the next two to three years.

The Proposed Restructuring and the Plan contemplate the following
transactions.  Holders of Existing Senior Secured Notes will
receive payment in full in the form of (i) new senior secured notes
due 2022 in the aggregate principal amount of $385 million at 10%
interest payable semi-annually, commencing on Jan. 1, 2017, (ii)
cash consideration of $20 million, (iii) a debt-to-equity
conversion of the remaining balance of the Existing Senior Secured
Notes (including all accrued and unpaid interest through and
inclusive of the Petition Date) in exchange for 12.08% of the new
common stock in Reorganized Roust and (iv) the right to participate
in the $55 million offering of new common stock in Reorganized
Roust, with the Existing Senior Secured Notes Committee agreeing to
backstop $5 million of the Share Placement.

Holders of Existing Convertible Notes will receive an estimated
recovery of approximately 27% in the form of (i) 10.59% of the
equity of Reorganized Roust through a debt-to-equity conversion of
the Existing Convertible Notes, (ii) 1.00% of the equity in
Reorganized Roust (contributed by the Russian Standard Parties to
the holders of Existing Convertible Notes), (iii) the right to
participate in the Share Placement, with the Existing Convertible
Notes Committee agreeing to backstop $50 million of the Share
Placement, and (iv) the right to participate in the Existing Senior
Secured Notes Equity Subscription.

The Proposed Restructuring is made possible in part by the Russian
Standard Parties' agreement to contribute significant value to
Reorganized Roust.  In particular, the Russian Standard Parties
will contribute the Russian Standard Vodka business and all related
RSV intellectual property and compromise certain debt owed by
subsidiaries of Roust to certain of RTL's non-Roust subsidiaries.
In exchange for these contributions, the Russian Standard Parties
are entitled to receive 64.04% of the equity in Reorganized Roust.
However, the Russian Standard Parties will allocate 1.00% of this
equity to holders of the Existing Convertible Notes and 6.00% of
this equity to participants in the Share Placement.  The
implementation of these concurrent transactions will be considered
repayment in full of all intercompany loans owed to the Company
from RTL and its direct and indirect subsidiaries.

In consideration for the Backstop Noteholders' commitment to
purchase the New Common Stock, the Backstop Noteholders will
receive a backstop fee equal to 0.25% of the shares of the New
Common Stock to be issued and outstanding on the Effective Date. In
addition, the Backstop Agreement requires the Debtors to indemnify,
and pay certain contribution and reimbursement claims to, the
Backstop Noteholders.

Both the RSA and the Backstop Agreement provide that the Debtors
will pay or reimburse the reasonable fees and expenses of the
Consenting Noteholders' counsel and advisors.  The RSA additionally
provides that the Debtors will assume the fee letters entered into
by the Debtors and those professionals.

                     About Roust Corporation

Roust Corporation, formerly Central European Distribution
Corporation -- http://www.roust.com/-- is a vodka producer.  The
Company's business primarily involves the production and sale of
its own spirit brands, and the importation of a range of spirits
and wines.  It operates its business based upon three primary
segments: Poland, Russia and Hungary.  In Poland, its brand
portfolio includes Absolwent, Zubrowka, Zubrowka Biala, Soplica,
Bols and Palace brands.  Its other brands include Absolwent
Grapefruit, Absolwent Apple Mint, Zubrowka Zlota, Soplica Plum and
Soplica Blackcurrant.  It produces and sells vodkas primarily in
three vodka sectors: premium, mainstream and economy.  Its primary
operations are conducted in Poland, Russia, Ukraine and Hungary. It
has around six operational manufacturing facilities located in
Poland and Russia.  It also produces ready-to-drink alcoholic
beverages, such as wine-based Amore, gin-based Bravo Classic and
Elle.

On April 7, 2013, CEDC and two subsidiaries sought bankruptcy
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.
Del. Lead Case No. 13-10738) with a prepackaged Chapter 11 plan
that reduced debt by $665.2 million.  CEDC emerged from bankruptcy
in June 2013 after confirming a plan that gave RTL, owned by
Roustam Tariko, 100% of the outstanding stock in exchange for
funding cash payments required by the Plan.

On Dec. 30, 2016, Roust Corporation and two affiliated companies
each filed Chapter 11 petitions to seek confirmation of a
prepackaged plan that would reduce debt by more than $462 million.

The Debtors' new cases have been assigned to Judge Robert D. Drain.
The Debtors are seeking to have their cases jointly administered
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 16-23786).  The petitions were
signed by Grant Winterton, CEO.

The Debtors disclosed $1,373,863,812 in assets and liabilities of
$787,054,813 as of Nov. 30, 2016.

In the new Chapter 11 cases, the Debtors are represented by
attorneys Scott Simpson, Jay
Goffman, Mark McDermott, Mark Chehi and Sarah Pierce of Skadden
Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP.  The Debtors also tapped Houlihan
Lokey, Inc., as investment banker; and Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions,
LLC as claims and noticing agent.


RUBLE HOLDINGS: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Feb. 9
-----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
is set to hold a hearing on Feb. 9, at 2:30 p.m., to consider
approval of the disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 plan
of Ruble Holdings, LLC.

The hearing will take place at the Dan M. Russell, Jr. Courthouse,
Bankruptcy Courtroom, Seventh Floor, 2012 15th Street, Gulfport,
Mississippi.  Objections are due by Feb. 2.

                      About Ruble Holdings

Ruble Holdings, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case No. 14-51336) on Aug. 26,
2014.  The petition was signed by John H. Ruble, managing member.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets at $1
million to $10 million and debt at $500,000 to $1 million.

The Debtor is represented by Patrick A. Sheehan, Esq., at Sheehan &
Johnson, PLLC.


SQN HELO 5: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------
Debtor affiliates filing separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions:

    Debtor                                        Case No.
    ------                                        --------
    SQN Helo 5, LLC                               17-10007
    c/o National Registered Agents, Inc.
    160 Greentree Drive, Suite 101
    Dover, DE 19904

    SQN Helo 7, LLC                               17-10008
    c/o National Registered Agents, Inc.
    160 Greentree Drive, Suite 101
    Dover, DE 19904

    SQN Helo 8, LLC                               17-10010
    c/o National Registered Agents, Inc.
    160 Greentree Drive, Suite 101
    Dover, DE 19904

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 3, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware (Delaware)

Judge: Hon. Brendan Linehan Shannon

Debtors' Counsel: Thomas Joseph Francella, Jr., Esq.
                  WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLC
                  The Renaissance Centre, Suite 500
                  405 North King Street
                  Wilmington, DE 19801
                  Tel: 302-357-3252
                  Fax: 302-357-3272
                  E-mail: tfrancella@wtplaw.com

Debtors'          
Special
Corporate
and Litigation
Counsel:          MCGUIRE, CRADDOCK & STROTHER, P.C.

                                          Estimated   Estimated
                                           Assets     Liabilities
                                          ---------   -----------
SQN Helo 5, LLC                           $1M-$10M     $1M-$10M
SQN Helo 7, LLC                           $1M-$10M     $1M-$10M
SQN Helo 8, LLC                           $1M-$10M     $1M-$10M
  
The petitions were signed by Jeremiah J. Silkowski, president and
CEO.

The Debtors indicated that they have no unsecured creditors.


STARZ ACQUISITION: Can Use Cash Collateral Until March 31
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Caryl E. Delano of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middile
District of Florida authorized Starz Acquisition, LLC, to use cash
collateral on an interim basis, through March 31, 2017.

The Debtor was authorized to use cash collateral to pay its current
and necessary expenses, as well as the monthly premium for its
Liquor License Insurance in the amount of $129.

The approved Budget, which covered the period Oct. 1, 2016 through
March 31, 2017, provided for total expenses in the amount of
$35,765 for January 2017, $63,828 for February 2017, and $96,911
for March 2017.

Each creditor with a security interest in the cash collateral was
granted a perfected post-petition lien against cash collateral to
the same extent and with the same validity and priority as the
alleged prepetition lien.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Dec. 28, 2016, is available at

http://bankrupt.com/misc/StarzAcquisition2016_916bk08045fmd_62.pdf

                     About Starz Acquisition, LLC

Starz Acquisition, LLC, which operates Italian
restaurants/pizzerias, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D.
Fla. Case No. 16-08045), on Sept. 18, 2016.  The petition was
signed by David Lee Virginia, managing member.  The Debtor is
represented by Michael R. Dal Lago, Esq., at Dal Lago Law.  The
Debtor estimated assets at $100,001 to $500,000 and liabilities at
$500,001 to $1 million at the time of the filing.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Starz Acquisition, LLC, as of
Oct. 21, 2016, according to a court docket.


WAYSIDE PRODUCTIONS: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 31
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of
Wayside Productions Inc. at a hearing on Jan. 31, at 2:00 p.m.

The court had earlier approved Wayside Productions' disclosure
statement, allowing the company to start soliciting votes from
creditors.  

The Dec. 20 order set a Jan. 20 deadline for creditors to cast
their votes and file their objections.

Under the proposed plan, Texas Workforce, which has an allowed
Class 2 secured claim of $6420.95, will receive a monthly payment
of $100 starting April 2017 until May 2022, with an interest rate
of 9%.  The balloon payment is due May 2022.  The creditor will
also maintain its lien interest.

General unsecured creditors will recover 100% under the plan.
Payment will be distributed monthly in the amount of $1,951
beginning April 2017 and ending March 2022, according to court
filings.

                    About Wayside Productions

Wayside Productions Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Case No. 16-50198) on Jan. 27, 2016.  Morris E. "Trey" White
III, Esq., at Villa & White LLP serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.


WHISKEY ONE: Court Denies Approval of Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. David E. Rice of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland has denied approval of Whiskey One Eight,
LLC's amended disclosure statement in support of the Debtor's
second amended plan of reorganization dated Nov. 23, 2016.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 14, 2016, the
Debtor filed with the Court the amended disclosure statement,
stating that the Debtor has proposed its Plan to reorganize its
affairs in a manner that permits it to use the R-22 zoning
designation of the Property to develop it for sale to one or more
residential builders.  The Plan would be funded by the proceeds of
sales, as well as court-approved financing, if any, and litigation
proceeds.  The Plan provided for payment of holders of allowed
claims in full over time.  

                      About Whiskey One

Whiskey One Eight, LLC, is a Maryland limited liability company
having a principal place of business in Anne Arundel County,
Maryland.  The Debtor was organized by the filing of Articles of
Organization with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation
on or about Aug. 9, 2005.  It was organized to hold title to a
valuable fifty-acre parcel, having a street address of 520 Brock
Bridge Road, Laurel, Maryland 20724, commonly known as the Suburban
Airport Property and to conduct development-related activities in
connection with the Property.

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D. Md.
Case No. 15-19885) on July 15, 2015.  Andrew Zois signed the
petition as managing member.  The Debtor disclosed total assets of
$18,008,600 and total liabilities of $5,100,057 as of the Chapter
11 filing.

Lawrence Joseph Yumkas, Esq., at Yumkas, Vedmar & Sweeney, LLC, as
the Debtor's counsel.  Judge David E. Rice presides over the case.

The Debtor, on Feb. 10, 2016, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, a plan of
reorganization, which impairs all general unsecured claims.  A
full-text copy of the Plan is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/WOEplan0210.pdf


WILLIAM CONTRACTOR: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Feb. 15
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico is set to
hold a hearing on Feb. 15, at 2:00 p.m., to consider approval of
the disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 plan of William
Contractor Inc.

The hearing will take place at the Jose V. Toledo Federal Building
and U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 1, Second Floor, 300 Recinto, Sur,
Old San Juan, Puerto Rico.  Objections must be filed not less than
14 days prior to the hearing.

The proposed plan classifies Banco Popular de Puerto Rico's
unsecured claim in Class 5.  The bank, which holds a lien against
William Contractor's real estate, asserts a $549,658 claim.   Banco
Popular has already filed a proceeding related to the property in a
local court.

William Contractor will provide payment to Banco Popular's allowed
secured claim up to the remaining debt or value of the collateral,
or pursuant to agreement between the parties if the property is not
auctioned before the payment.   Class 5 is impaired, according to
court filings.

                    About William Contractor

Headquartered in Aguada, Puerto Rico, William Contractor Inc. filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No.
15-06311) on Aug. 18, 2015, listing $6.38 million in total assets
and $2.56 million in total liabilities.  The petition was signed by
Lymari Benique Moralez, vice president - secretary.

Damaris Quinones Vargas, Esq., at Bufete Quinones Vargas & Asoc
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


YBRANT MEDIA: Disclosures Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 26
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
will consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of
Ybrant Media Acquisition, Inc. at a hearing on Jan. 26.

The hearing will be held at 10:00 a.m., at the Alexander Hamilton
Custom House, Courtroom 701, One Bowling Green, New York.

The court had earlier approved Ybrant Media's disclosure statement,
allowing the company to start soliciting votes from creditors.  

The Dec. 20 order set a Jan. 19 deadline for creditors to cast
their votes and file their objections.

Under the proposed restructuring plan, non-insider unsecured claims
will be paid in full, without interest, in 12 months.  Payments
will start on the effective date of the plan or 10 business days
after the claim is allowed by the court.

Meanwhile, Ybrant Media will pay insider unsecured claims in full,
without interest, in 24 months, according to court filings.

                       About Ybrant Media

Ybrant Media Acquisition, Inc. was incorporated in 2007 and is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Ybrant Digital Limited, a global digital
marketing company organized under the laws of India, whose shares
are publicly traded on the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National
Stock Exchange of India.  The Debtor was created to purchase and
manage the assets of Internet and media-related businesses.

Ybrant Media filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-10597) on March 14, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Suresh K. Reddy as chief executive officer.  The Debtor
estimated assets in the range of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of up to $50 million.  Rosen & Associates, P.C., serves
as the Debtor's counsel.


YOGA SMOGA: Wants to Obtain $350,000 DIP Financing
--------------------------------------------------
Yoga Smoga, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York for authorization to obtain postpetition
secured financing from Tapasya Bali and Rishi Bali.

The Debtor contends it has an immediate need for postpetition
financing to continue its operations and to maintain its
properties, while it implements its business plan, which is
designed to maximize value for all of its stakeholders.

The Debtor relates that the terms of their financing arrangement
are governed by a DIP Note, which provides that the DIP Lenders
will make an initial loan commitment of $50,000 on an interim basis
and an aggregate loan commitment on a final basis of $350,000.  
The Debtor further relates that interest on the unpaid principal
amount will accrue at a rate equal to 9%.  Following an Event of
Default, the interest rate will increase by 2%.

The Debtor proposes to grant the DIP Lenders a superpriority
administrative expense claim and a first priority lien on all the
Debtor's assets except for assets that are subject to certain
prepetition valid and perfected liens, as to which the DIP Lenders
would receive a junior lien, and the Carve-Out.

The Debtor tells the Court that the Loan Commitment is expected to
provide the financing the Debtor requires for up to an
approximately nine month period following the Petition Date, with a
maturity date of Sept. 30, 2017.  The Debtor believes that
confirmation of a chapter 11 plan within this time-frame is
feasible.  

The Carve-Out consists of:

     (1) fees payable to the U.S. Trustee or to the Clerk of the
Bankruptcy Court;

     (2) unpaid professional fees and expenses payable to each
legal or financial advisor retained by the Debtor and the
Creditors' Committee that are incurred or accrued prior to the date
of the occurrence of a Termination Event;

     (3) all unpaid Professional Fees payable to each legal or
financial advisor retained by the Debtor and the Creditors'
Committee that are incurred or accrued after the date of the
occurrence of a Termination Event, but in all eventsnin an amount
not to exceed $75,000 for the Debtor's professionals and $25,000
for the Creditors' Committee's professionals.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Dec. 28, 2016, are
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/YogaSmoga2016_1613538mew_25.pdf

A full-text copy of the Debtor-in-Possession Promissory Note, dated
Dec. 28, 2016, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/YogaSmoga2016_1613538mew_25_1.pdf

                         About Yoga Smoga, Inc.

Yoga Smoga, Inc., filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 16-13538) on
Dec. 19, 2016.  The petition was signed by Tapasya Bali, chief
executive officer.  The Debtor is represented by Jil Mazer-Marino,
Esq., at Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.  The case is assigned
to Judge Michael E. Wiles.  The Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million at the time of the filing.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2017.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***