TCR_Public/161128.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, November 28, 2016, Vol. 20, No. 332

                            Headlines

4LICENSING CORP: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Dec. 15
4LICENSING CORP: Seeks Court Approval for Cash Collateral Use
ACTIVECARE INC: Has Loan Forbearance Agreement with PFG
AF BORROWER: S&P Revises Outlook on 'B' CCR Due to Leverage
AFFINITY HEALTHCARE: Can Get RMS Funding, Use Cash Collateral

ALPHA NATURAL: Contura Board Issues Statement on Restructuring
AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES: Amends 5.3M Shares Prospectus with SEC
AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES: Prices Offering of Common Stock and Warrants
AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES: Settles "NRM VII" Litigation for $2 Million
ATHABASCA OIL: DBRS Confirms 'B' Issuer Rating

ATLAS FINANCIAL: A.M. Best Affirms 'B' Finc'l. Strength Rating
AURORA DIAGNOSTICS: S&P Lowers CCR to 'CCC' on High Default Risk
AYTU BIOSCIENCE: Stockholders Elect Five Directors
BALTAZAR MARTINEZ: Unsecureds To Get Pro Rata Share of $1,500
BARLEN PG: Consigning Equipment to Michigan CAT to Pay IRS Claims

BCDG LP: Status Hearing on Cash Collateral Use Set on Nov. 29
BEST LIFE: A.M. Best Affirms B(Fair) Financial Strength Rating
BH SUTTON: Auction Sale of New York Properties on Dec. 8 Approved
BIG APPLE CIRCUS: Can Get $66,058 DIP Loan on Interim Basis
BIG APPLE CIRCUS: Dec. 6 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel

BIOCORRX INC: Incurs $2.60 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
BOSS INVESTMENTS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
BPS US HOLDINGS: Hires Young Conaway as Co-counsel
BRAZIL MINERALS: Peter Goldy Reports 8.61% Stake as of Nov. 16
BUFFETS LLC: Creditors' Committee Calls for Ch. 11 Trustee

C & D PRODUCE: Gordon Foods Seeks Dismissal, Ch. 11 Trustee
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: Presented at Bank of American Conference
CANNERY CASINO: S&P Puts $20MM Loan's 'B' Rating on Watch Positive
CENTORBI CUSTOM: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
CHEMTURA CORP: Discharge Injunction Enforced vs Benzene Claimants

CHINA FISHERY: Court OKs Appointment of W. Brandt as Ch. 11 Trustee
CLINICA SANTA ROSA: U.S. Trustee Ordered to Appoint PCO
COLOR LANDSCAPES: Has Until Dec. 21 to Use BB&T Cash Collateral
COMPREHENSIVE PHYSICIANS: Wants Approval to Use Cash Collateral
COMSTOCK RESOURCES: PointState Funds Have 9.99% Stake as of Nov. 8

CONDUENT INC: Fitch Assigns Final 'BB' IDR; Outlook Stable
CONSOLIDATED ENERGY: ATC Buying Alexandria Property for $2.3M
CONTECH HOLDINGS: S&P Withdraws 'B' CCR on Acquisition by Quikrete
COSI INC: Cash Collateral Hearing Continued to December 7
DAILY HAVEN: Wants Authorization to Use Rialto Cash Collateral

DALLAS, TX: Pension Fund for Police, Firefighters in Near Collapse
DAYTON POWER: S&P Affirms BB ICR on Amended Regulatory Rider Filing
DETROIT DOWNTOWN: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' Rating on 2 Bond Tranches
DIFFUSION PHARMACEUTICALS: Incurs $5.43 Million Net Loss in Q3
DOMINICA LLC: Court Allows Cash Collateral Use Through Jan. 4

ELBIT IMAGING: Unit's Neuro System Okayed by CMS for U.S. Coverage
ELBIT IMAGING: Updates Agreement to Sell Project in Bangalore
ERICKSON INC: Common Stock Delisted From NASDAQ
ERIN ENERGY: Incurs $23.5 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
ERNEST SHEPHERD: Plan Confirmation Hearing on Jan. 4

EVERARDO MACA: Disclosures OK'd; Dec. 14 Plan Confirmation Hearing
EVERGREEN HEALTH: Hecht-Lead Auction of Caseville Property on Jan 6
EXTREME PLASTICS: Cash Use Allowed on Final Basis Until March 31
FAIRFIELD SENTRY: Bid for Approval of 2011 Claims Assignment Denied
FARMERS MUTUAL: A.M. Best Affirms B(Fair) Finc'l. Strength Rating

FARMHAND SUPPLY: Rabo Agrifinance Wants to Prohibit Cash Use
FREDERICK KEITEL: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment with 4% Interest
FRYMIRE SERVICES: Seeks to Modify Use of Cash Collateral
FULLER PROPERTIES: Sale of Franklin Property for $125K Approved
GABEL LEASE: U.S. Trustee Seeks Ch. 11 Examiner Appointment

GLOBAL AMENITIES: Ch. 11 Trustee Sought Amid Mismanagement
GOLFSMITH INT'L: BH Buying Austin Golfsmith Campus for $22M
GOPHER PROTOCOL: Delays Filing of Sept. 30 Form 10-Q
GRAND VOLUTE: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral After Nov. 21
GRAND VOLUTE: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Through Jan. 5

GRANVILLE BRINKMAN: Wihbey Buying Tacoma Condo Unit for $270K
GREAT BASIN: Has 165.48M Outstanding Common Shares as of Nov. 18
GREYSTAR REAL: S&P Revises Outlook to Pos. & Affirms 'BB-' ICR
GULF CHEMICAL: Selling Miscellaneous Assets
GURKARN DIAMOND: Wants Authorization to Use Cash Collateral

HAMPSHIRE GROUP: Files Chapter 11 to Facilitate Orderly Wind-Down
HIGH-TOP HOLDINGS: James G. Baker Named Chapter 11 Trustee
HONGLI CLEAN: Receives Additional Nasdaq Notice on Delayed 10-Q
HRG GROUP: Strategic Alternatives Plan No Impact on Fitch's B IDR
III EXPLORATION II: Selling Eastern Uintah Basin Property for $3.5M

III EXPLORATION II: Selling Western Uintah Basin Property for $52M
ILYA GOLUB: Real Estate Tax Claim To Be Fully Paid in 52Mos. at 12%
INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS: Incurs $7.5 Million Net Loss in 3rd Quarter
INVERSORA ELECTRICA: U.S. Court Recognizes Argentine Proceeding
IOWA FERTILIZER: Fitch Cuts $1.185BB Disaster Area Bonds to B-

IPS CORP: S&P Assigns 'B' CCR & Rates $310MM 1st-Lien Loan 'B'
J.G. NASCON: Associated Paving Buying Milling Machine for $190K
J.G. NASCON: Calvin Group Buying Paver for $225K
JOHN M. SCALI SR: Unsecureds to Get 20% Over a 24-Month Period
JOSEPH D. ROMANIELLO: SBA to be Paid in Full Over 5-Year Period

KDS GROUP: Seeks Authority to Use Comerica Bank Cash Collateral
KOPH INC: Court Allows Cash Collateral Use Through Jan. 12
L&M TRANSPORTATION: Seeks Use of $42,271 Cash Collateral
LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
LAURA GENS: Unsecureds To Get 100% Over 60 Months at 0.64%

LESLIE ROGER SAUNDERS: Plan Confirmation Hearing on Dec. 21
LINDEN & ASSOCIATES: Unsecureds To Recoup 20% Under Plan
LKN PROPERTIES: Gouvis Buying Irvine Property for $4.2M
MAHI LLC: Can Use United Community Bank Cash Until Jan. 18
MARINA BIOTECH: Inks Merger Agreement with IthenaPharma

MARK JENKINSON: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Dec. 13
MATHIOPOULOS 3M: Allowed to Use Cash Through Jan. 31
MCSGLOBAL INC: Kellton Buying All Assets for $200K
MDC PARTNERS: S&P Lowers CCR to 'B' on Cash Flow Deficits
MEADOWS AT CYPRESS: Jan 30 Deadline for Filing Disclosure Statement

MEDIMPACT HOLDINGS: Fitch Assigns 'BB-' Issuer Default Rating
MEDITE CANCER: Appoints David Patterson as CFO
MESOBLAST LIMITED: Reports Results for Q1 Ended Sept. 30, 2016
MILES APPLIANCE: JDM Properties Buying Assets for $300K
MOUNSEF INTERNATIONAL: Hearing on Disclosures, Plan OK on Dec. 22

NETA HATHAWAY: Trustee'S Sale of 19 LAACO Shares Approved
NEW JERSEY HEADWEAR: Dec. 1 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
NEW STREAMWOOD: Unsecureds to Recover 1% Over 5 Years
NIKHIL BABU: Plan Confirmation Hearing To Be Continued on Dec. 21
NO PLACE LIKE HOME: Court Lifts Stay to Permit Arbitration

NUSTAR ENERGY: Fitch Assigns 'BB' IDR & Rates Preferred Equity 'B+'
NUVERRA ENVIRONMENTAL: Moody's Withdraws Caa3 Corp Family Rating
NUVIRA HOSPITALITY: Court Dismisses Ch. 11 Small Business Case
OMINTO INC: Signs 5-Year Employment Agreement with CEO
OPEXA THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $2 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter

ORLEANS HOMEBUILDERS: Court Says Plan Bars Association's Claims
PARKLANDS OFFICE: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 10
PENNGOOD LLC: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Dec. 21
PETROLIA ENERGY: Incurs $597,000 Net Loss in Third Quarter
PFO GLOBAL: Incurs $1.18 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter

PHOTOMEDEX INC: Incurs $7.41 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
PRELUDE INVESTMENT: Proposes to Use JP Morgan Chase Cash Collateral
PRODUCTION RESOURCE: S&P Corrects Rating on $400MM Notes to 'C'
PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY: Cosmic Holds 54.7% Stake as of Nov. 7
PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY: Reports $1.27 Million Net Loss for Q3

PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY: White Winston Owns 9.9% Stake as of Nov. 7
PYKKONEN CAPITAL: Hearing on Plan Confirmation Set for Dec. 6
QUANTUM MATERIALS: Incurs $1.57 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
QUANTUMSPHERE INC: Delays Filing of Sept. 30 Form 10-Q
QUEST PATENT: Incurs $5,000 Net Loss in Third Quarter

RANCHO ARROYO: Kim Buying Arroyo Grande Property for $1.4M
RENNOVA HEALTH: Incurs $12 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
RENT-A-CENTER INC: S&P Revises CCR to 'BB-' on Continued Challenges
REPWEST INSURANCE: A.M. Best Raises Fin'l Strength Rating From B
RICHARD DENNIS HAYNES: BB&T To Be Paid in 60 Months at 3.25%

RICHARD DODDS: Selling Frazee Property, Employs Brouse as Broker
RICHARD LUTZ: Berks Buying Moorestown Property for $1.7M
RIVERWOOD GAS: Case Summary & 16 Unsecured Creditors
ROBERT ZARTLER: Files Amended Disclosure Statement
ROCKY MOUNTAIN: Incurs $730,000 Net Loss in Sept. 30 Quarter

ROWE CONTRACTING: Dec. 21 Disclosure Statement Hearing
RXI PHARMACEUTICALS: Amends Form S-1 Prospectus with SEC
SALADO SMILES: Selling Everbank Collateral for $21K
SITEONE LANDSCAPE: S&P Affirms 'B+' CCR; Outlook Stable
SMILES AND GIGGLES: Jan 16 Deadline for Filing Disclosure Statement

SNAP INTERACTIVE: Names Boar Member Krandel as CFO
SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Raises CCR to B- on Improved Revenues
SOUTHCROSS ENERGY: Bret Allan Assumes PAO Position
SOUTHERN STATES: S&P Lowers CCR to 'CCC+' on Cash Flow Weakness
SPRING VALLEY: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral

STONE ENERGY: Enters Into Third Amendment to Restructuring Pact
STONE ENERGY: Soliciting Acceptance of Prepackaged Plan
STONE PANELS: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Until Dec. 16
STRATA SKIN: Files Form 10-Q, Incurs $1.5M Net Loss in Q3
SUSAN DIBIASE LUTZ: Berks Buying Moorestown Property for $1.7M

SUZANNE ALESHIRE: Payment of $10K to FactorLaw Approved
SYDELL INC: Wants to Continue Using Cash Through April 1
TENET HEALTHCARE: Fitch Assigns B- Rating on $750MM 2nd Lien Notes
TERRA-GEN FINANCE: S&P Lowers CCR to 'B' on Slow Deleveraging
TIMOTHY MCCALLAN: Florida Debt Counselor Owes $100M, Files Ch. 7

TOWN & COUNTRY: Seeks Court Approval for Cash Collateral Use
TRIPLE C FLATBED: Creditors' Committee Seeks Ch. 11 Trustee
TUSCANY ENERGY: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Until Dec. 10
UNITED GAS: Amidi Buying Sacramento Assets for $2.9M
UPPER ROOM BIBLE: Can Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis

UPPER ROOM BIBLE: Court Approves Stipulation With Entergy
URANIUM ONE: Fitch Affirms 'BB-' LT FC Issuer Default Rating
WALTER H. BOOTH: Wants to Use Ocwen Loan Servicing Cash Collateral
WATERPROOFING UNLIMITED: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for Dec. 8
WILLIAM ALEX MCCLAIN: Unsecureds To Recoup 100% in 92 Payments

WILLIAM ERNST: Kang Buying DeRidder Property for $85K
WILLMAN CONSTRUCTION: Unsecureds To Be Fully Paid in 10Yrs. at 3.2%
XTERA COMMUNICATIONS: U.S. Trustee Forms 5-Member Committee
YELLOW CAB: U.S. Trustee Directed to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
YESHIVA OHEL MOSHE: Unsecured Creditors to Get Up to $506K

ZAIDA BROWN: Unsecured Creditors to Get $279 Each in 6 Years
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from Nov. 21 to 25, 2016

                            *********

4LICENSING CORP: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Dec. 15
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
will consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of
4Licensing Corp. at a hearing on December 15, at 10:00 a.m.

The hearing will be held at Courtroom No. 2, 224 South Boulder,
Tulsa, Oklahoma.

The court will also consider at the hearing the final approval of
the company's disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved
on November 8.  

The order set a December 12 deadline for creditors to cast their
votes and file their objections to the proposed restructuring plan
filed by 4Licensing on November 4.

                     About 4Licensing Corp.

4Licensing Corp. is a licensing company specializing in specialty
brands, technologies and youth-oriented markets.

4Licensing Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Okla. Case No. 16-11714) on Sept. 21,
2016.  The petition was signed by Phil Frohlich, president.  The
case is assigned to Judge Terrence L. Michael.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $867,142 in assets
and $2.11 million in liabilities.

Neal Tomlins, Esq., of Tomlins & Peters, PLLC, represent the
Debtor.


4LICENSING CORP: Seeks Court Approval for Cash Collateral Use
-------------------------------------------------------------
4Licensing Corporation asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Oklahoma for authorization to use cash
collateral.

The Debtor is indebted to:

     (1) Prescott Group Aggressive Small Cap Master Fund, G.P., in
an amount exceeding $1,800,000; and

     (2) Leslie G. Rudd Living Trust, in the amount of $95,000.

Prescott Group and Leslie G. Rudd Living Trust assert that they
have perfected liens and security interests in the Debtor's assets
including cash collateral.

The Debtor tells the Court that it needs to use cash to engage in
its limited business activities primarily to pay the costs and
expenses of administering its bankruptcy case such as fees due to
the U.S. Trustee and satisfy its post-petition liabilities.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Nov. 11, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/4Licensing2016_1611714m_37.pdf

               About 4Licensing Corporation

4Licensing Corp. is a licensing company specializing in specialty
brands, technologies and youth-oriented markets.

4Licensing Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Okla. Case No. 16-11714) on Sept. 21,
2016.  The petition was signed by Phil Frohlich, president.  The
case is assigned to Judge Terrence L. Michael.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $867,142 in assets
and $2.11 million in liabilities.

Neal Tomlins, Esq., of Tomlins & Peters, PLLC, represents the
Debtor.



ACTIVECARE INC: Has Loan Forbearance Agreement with PFG
-------------------------------------------------------
As previously reported, on Sept. 9, 2016, ActiveCare, Inc. and its
senior secured lender, Partners for Growth IV, L.P., entered into a
Forbearance Loan and Security Agreement.  Pursuant to the terms of
the September Forbearance Agreement, PFG agreed to forbear from
exercising remedies with regard to certain breaches of agreements
between the Company and PFG, including the Loan and Security
Agreement, dated as of Feb. 19, 2016, between the Company and PFG,
and those certain security agreements entered into in connection
therewith.

Effective Nov. 10, 2016, the Company and PFG entered into a
Forbearance and Consent Under Loan and Security Agreement. Pursuant
to the terms of the November Forbearance Agreement, PFG will
forbear from exercising remedies with regard to certain breaches of
agreements between the Company and PFG, including the Existing PFG
Agreements as well as the September Forbearance Agreement.

Additionally, pursuant to the November Forbearance Agreement, PFG
has provided the Company with the consent required under the
Existing PFG Agreements and September Forbearance Agreement to,
among other things, make certain payments of debt to third parties
as more specifically outlined therein.  In consideration for the
November Forbearance Agreement, the Company has agreed to issue PFG
Warrants to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock as more
specifically outlined in the November Forbearance Agreement. The
forbearance set forth in the November Forbearance Agreement will be
in effect through Dec. 31, 2016.

A full-text copy of the November Forbearance Agreement is available
for free at https://is.gd/YI2cU9

                        About ActiveCare

South West Valley City, Utah-based ActiveCare, Inc., develops and
markets products for monitoring the health of and providing
assistance to mobile and homebound seniors and the chronically
ill.

ActiveCare is organized into three business.  The Stains and
Reagents segment is engaged in the business of manufacturing and
marketing medical diagnostic stains, solutions and related
equipment to hospitals and medical testing labs.  The CareServices
segment is engaged in the business of developing, distributing and
marketing mobile health monitoring and concierge services to
distributors and customers.  The Chronic Illness Monitoring segment
is primarily engaged in the monitoring of diabetic patients on a
real time basis.

ActiveCare reported a net loss of $12.8 million on $6.59 million of
chronic illness monitoring revenues for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2015, compared with a net loss of $16.4 million on $6.10
million of chronic illness monitoring revenues for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, ActiveCare had $1.91 million in total assets,
$21.01 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $19.10 million.

Tanner LLC, in Salt Lake City, Utah, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2015, citing that the Company has recurring losses,
negative cash flows from operating activities, negative working
capital, negative total equity, and certain debt that is in
default.  These conditions, among others, raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.


AF BORROWER: S&P Revises Outlook on 'B' CCR Due to Leverage
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it revised the outlook to stable from
negative and affirmed its 'B' corporate credit rating on
Denver-based AF Borrower LLC.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B' issue-level rating with a
recovery rating of '3' on the company's $410 million first-lien
term loan.  The '3' recovery rating indicates expectations for
meaningful (50% to 70%; at the lower end of the range) recovery of
principal in the event of default.  In addition, S&P affirmed its
'CCC+' issue-level rating with a '6' recovery rating on the
company's $195 million second-lien term loan.  The '6' recovery
rating indicates expectations for negligible (0% to 10%) recovery
in the event of payment default.

"The outlook revision reflects leverage in the low-5x area and our
view that the company could generate around $60 million of free
cash flow over the next 12 months," said S&P Global Ratings credit
analyst Minesh Shilotri.

The rating reflects the company's exposure to a growing but
competitive security products and services end-market, good
customer diversity, and steadily increasing client count and spend.
The company has successfully completed the 2015 merger between
Accuvant and FishNet, and has continued to make small acquisitions
in 2016 (regional value-added resellers as well as security
consulting companies) to improve its services portfolio. More than
half of the company's revenues are recurring, through subscription
and maintenance services, with the rest of the revenues tied to
security consulting, software license sales, and hardware sales.
S&P expects the company's profitability to improve, due to strong
growth of its security consulting segment in a market dominated by
Deloitte, EY, PwC, KPMG, and other large companies.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that Optiv Security will
continue to benefit from its exposure to the security end market,
grow its revenue base, and generate positive free cash flow over
the next 12 months.



AFFINITY HEALTHCARE: Can Get RMS Funding, Use Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Julie A. Manning of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut authorized Affinity Healthcare Management,
Inc. and its affiliated debtors to sell provider accounts
receivable to Revenue Management Solutions, LLC, to obtain
indebtedness with administrative super-priority, and to use cash
collateral until
Dec. 17, 2016.

Health Care Investors, Inc. d/b/a Alexandria Manor, Health Care
Alliance, Inc. d/b/a Blair Manor, Health Care Assurance, LLC d/b/a
Douglas Manor, and Health Care Reliance, LLC d/b/a Ellis Manor,
also known as the Providers, operate four skilled nursing
facilities in Connecticut, and the Lead Debtor, Affinity Health
Care Management, Inc., manages the affairs of the Providers.

Revenue Management Solutions purchased the Providers' healthcare
accounts receivables, together with all books, records, billing and
credit files, an irrevocable paid-up license to use related medical
and patient records, chattel paper, documents, instruments and
general intangibles.  The Purchase Agreement provided that the
aggregate amount of the Outstanding Initial Installments plus any
other outstanding Obligations of the Providers should not exceed
$2,500,000.  To secure all of the Providers' obligations arising
out of the Purchase Agreement, Revenue Management Solutions was
granted a continuing security interest in and liens upon the right,
title and interest in all of the Providers' properties, assets, and
rights.

The aggregate amount of the Outstanding Initial Installments due
and payable pursuant to the Prepetition Funding Facility was
$1,450,000 as of the Petition Date.  

The Debtors represented that substantially all of their cash,
including the cash in their deposit accounts, constitute Revenue
Management Solutions' cash collateral.

The Debtors related that the Providers had requested Revenue
Management Solutions, and that Revenue Management Solutions is
willing to purchase Accounts and extend to the Providers, certain
Initial Installments, Subsequent Installments and other financial
and funding accommodations.

The Debtors contended that they do not have sufficient available
sources to provide working capital to operate their businesses in
the ordinary course without the requested postpetition funding from
Revenue Management Solutions.  The Debtors further contended that
the Providers' ability to provide patient services, and maintain
their business relationships with vendors, suppliers and employees,
and to otherwise fund their operations, are essential to the
Providers' viability.

Judge Manning acknowledged that there is an immediate need for
funding to minimize the disruption of the Providers' business and
daily operations, manage and preserve the assets of its bankruptcy
estate, provide patient care to existing and future patients and
enhance the likelihood of a successful reorganization for the
benefit of the Debtors' bankruptcy estates, creditors and other
parties-in-interest.

Revenue Management Solutions is authorized to purchase the
Providers' postpetition purchased accounts and associated
postpetition conveyed property, on the terms and conditions of the
Purchase Agreement and other Funding Documents, free and clear of
liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances.

Revenue Management Services is granted:

     (a) adequate protection liens and super-priority claims,
subject to the Carve-Out;

     (b) current payments fees, costs and expenses and other
amounts due under the Funding Documents; and

     (c) ongoing payment of the reasonable fees, costs and
expenses, including, without limitation, legal and other
professionals' fees and expenses of Revenue Management Solutions.

The State of Connecticut Department of Labor is granted adequate
protection liens.

The Carve-Out consists of :

     (1) allowed fees and reimbursement for disbursements of
professionals retained by the Debtors in an aggregate amount for
all such Professional Fees not to exceed $540,000;

     (2) allowed fees and reimbursement for disbursements of
professionals retained by the Statutory Committee in an aggregate
amount of all such Committee's Professional Fees not to exceed
$270,000;

     (3) quarterly fees, plus interest accrued, and any fees
payable to the clerk of the Bankruptcy Court; and

     (4) amounts due and owing to the Debtors' non-insider
employees for post-petition wages.

The Carve-Out amount will be funded, in part, by the Debtors with
the proceeds of the Post-Petition Funding Facility on a weekly
basis in an amount not less than $15,000 per week, and segregated
in an interest bearing deposit account held in escrow.

A further hearing on the Debtor's Motion is scheduled for hearing
on Dec. 14, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.
  
A full-text copy of the Interim Order dated Nov. 21, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/AffinityHealthcare2016_1630043_476.pdf

              About Affinity Healthcare Management

Affinity Health Care Management, Inc., Health Care Investors, Inc.
d/b/a Alexandria Manor, Health Care Alliance, Inc. d/b/a Blair
Manor, Health Care Assurance, L.L.C., d/b/a Douglas Manor and
Health Care Reliance, L.L.C. d/b/a Ellis Manor, are a nursing home
management company.  They filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Conn. Case Nos. 16-30043 to 16-30047) on Jan.
13, 2016.  The Hon. Julie A. Manning presides over the cases.
Elizabeth J. Austin, Esq., Irve J. Goldman, Esq. and Jessica
Grossarth, Esq., at Pullman & Comley, LLC, serve as counsel to the
Debtors.

Affinity Health Care Management estimated $50,000 to $100,000 in
assets and $500,000 to $1 million in liabilities.  The Debtors
noted in a court filing that their total secured and unsecured debt
exceeding $16 million.



ALPHA NATURAL: Contura Board Issues Statement on Restructuring
--------------------------------------------------------------
The independent members of the Board of Directors for Contura
Energy, Inc. on Nov. 18, 2016, released the following statement in
response to recent filings made by the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court,
Eastern District of Virginia in connection with the successful
restructuring of Alpha Natural Resources:

"Since Alpha's successful emergence from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
protection on July 26, 2016, and the concurrent sale of certain
core assets to Contura Energy, Inc., both entities have been
working diligently to implement their respective obligations under
Alpha's Plan of Reorganization confirmed by the Court.  By any
account, Alpha's restructuring case was extremely complex,
involving the oversight, input, and ultimately support of various
constituencies, federal and state government entities, surety
providers, union employees, pension beneficiaries, trade creditors,
and many others.

Over the past several weeks, Contura Energy's senior management has
worked proactively and closely with Alpha's senior management and
lender parties to Alpha's First Lien Credit Agreement, to resolve
certain issues identified during the Plan's implementation.  The
efforts of the aforementioned parties culminated in the First Lien
Settlement Agreement and the Contura Settlement Agreement filed by
Alpha with the Court on November 4, 2016.

In a subsequent filing with the Court on November 16, 2016, the
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection made claims
with respect to Contura's senior management that the Independent
Directors of Contura's board believe to be inaccurate and
defamatory as they are made without any evidence whatsoever, with
no basis in fact, and without merit.

The Independent Directors fully and completely support Contura's
senior management team.  The Independent Directors believe that
throughout this process, senior management has conducted themselves
with the utmost integrity and professionalism, and have worked
tirelessly to implement a complex reorganization while ensuring the
financial health of Alpha and Contura.  The efforts of Alpha's and
Contura's dedicated management teams continue to ensure the
preservation of thousands of jobs and provide value to both
companies' diverse set of stakeholders.  We challenge any inference
to the contrary.  We intend to work with all parties to resolve
these allegations and will vigorously defend the hard-earned
reputations and integrity of management to the fullest extent."

                       About Contura Energy

Contura Energy -- http://www.conturaenergy.com-- is a private,
Tennessee-based company with affiliate mining operations across
multiple major coal basins in Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia
and Wyoming.  With customers across the globe, high-quality
reserves and significant port capacity, Contura Energy reliably
supplies both metallurgical coal to produce steel and thermal coal
to generate power.

                 About Alpha Natural Resources

Headquartered in Bristol, Virginia, Alpha Natural --
http://www.alphanr.com/-- is a coal supplier, ranked second
largest among publicly traded U.S. coal producers as measured by
2014 consolidated revenues of $4.3 billion.  As of August 2015,
Alpha had 8,000 full time employees across many different states,
with UMWA representing 1,000 of the employees.

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 15-33896)
and its affiliates filed separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions
on Aug. 3, 2015, listing $9.9 billion in total assets as of June
30, 2015, and $7.3 billion in total liabilities as of June 30,
2015.

The petitions were signed by Richard H. Verheij, executive vice
president, general counsel and corporate secretary.

Judge Kevin R. Huennekens presides over the cases.

David G. Heiman, Esq., Carl E. Black, Esq., and Thomas A. Wilson,
Esq., at Jones Day serve as the Debtors' general counsel.  Tyler P.
Brown, Esq., J.R. Smith, Esq., Henry P. (Toby) Long, III, Esq., and
Justin F. Paget, Esq., serve as the Debtors' local counsel.

Rothschild Group is the Debtors' financial advisor.  Alvarez &
Marshal Holdings, LLC, is the Debtors' investment banker.  Kurtzman
Carson Consultants, LLC, is the Debtors' claims and noticing
agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed seven creditors of Alpha
Natural Resources Inc. to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors.  Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan R. Fleck, Esq.,
and Eric K. Stodola, Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP;

and William A. Gray, Esq., W. Ashley Burgess, Esq., and Roy M.
Terry, Jr., Esq. at Sands Anderson PC, represent the Committee.

Alpha Natural Resources on July 7, 2016, said its plan of
reorganization for the company and some of its wholly owned
subsidiaries has been confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court.  On July
26, Alpha Natural Resources and its affiliates emerged from Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection.  The reorganized company is a smaller,
privately held company operating 18 mines and eight preparation
plants in West Virginia and Kentucky.


AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES: Amends 5.3M Shares Prospectus with SEC
------------------------------------------------------------
AmpliPhi Biosciences Corporation filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission a fifth amendment to its Form S-1 registration
statement relating to the offering of 5,300,000 shares of its
common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,300,000
shares of its common stock (and the shares of common stock that are
issuable from time to time upon exercise of the warrants).

Each share of common stock is being sold together with a warrant to
purchase one share of the Company's common stock, at an exercise
price of $____ per share.  The warrants will be exercisable
immediately and will expire five years from the date of issuance.
The shares of common stock and warrants can only be purchased
together in this offering but will be issued separately and will be
immediately separable upon issuance.

The Company's common stock is listed on the NYSE MKT under the
symbol "APHB."  On Nov. 8, 2016, the last reported sale price of
the Company's common stock on the NYSE MKT was $1.00 per share.
There is no established public trading market for the warrants, and
the Company does not expect a market to develop.  In addition, the
Company does not intend to apply for a listing of the warrants on
any national securities exchange.

A full-text copy of the Form S-1/A is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/mGWAzm

                          About AmpliPhi

AmpliPhi Biosciences Corp. is a biotechnology company focused on
the discovery, development and commercialization of novel phage
therapeutics.  Its principal offices occupy approximately 1,000
square feet of leased office space pursuant to a month-to-month
sublease, located at 3579 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 100, San
Diego, California.  It also leases approximately 700 square feet of
lab space in Richmond, Virginia, approximately 5,000 square feet of
lab space in Brookvale, Australia, and approximately 6,000 square
feet of lab and office space in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had $26.03 million in total
assets, $7.80 million in total liabilities and $18.22 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Ampliphi reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$10.79 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to net
income attributable to common stockholders of $21.82 million.

"[T]he Company has incurred net losses since its inception, has
negative operating cash flows and has an accumulated deficit of
$371.9 million as of September 30, 2016, $56.4 million of which has
been accumulated since January of 2011, when the Company began its
focus on bacteriophage development.  As of September 30, 2016, the
Company had cash and cash equivalents of $4.0 million. Management
believes that the Company's existing resources will be sufficient
to fund the Company's planned operations through the end of 2016.
These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern," as disclosed in the
Company's quarterly report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2016.


AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES: Prices Offering of Common Stock and Warrants
------------------------------------------------------------------
AmpliPhi Biosciences Corporation announced the pricing of an
underwritten public offering of 5,335,000 shares of its common
stock and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 5,335,000
shares of common stock.  Each share of common stock is being sold
together with a warrant to purchase one share of common stock at a
combined price to the public of $0.75 per share and accompanying
warrant.  The warrants will be immediately exercisable at a price
of $0.75 per share of common stock and will expire five years from
the date of issuance.  The shares of common stock and warrants will
be issued separately and will be immediately separable upon
issuance.  The offering is expected to close on or about Nov. 22,
2016, subject to customary closing conditions.

The net proceeds to AmpliPhi from this offering are expected to be
approximately $3.8 million, after deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions and before deducting other offering expenses
payable by AmpliPhi, and excluding any proceeds that may be
received upon exercise of the warrants.  AmpliPhi anticipates using
the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes,
including manufacturing expenses, clinical trial expenses, research
and development expenses and general and administrative expenses.

Roth Capital Partners is acting as the sole book-running manager
for the offering and Griffin Securities, Inc. is acting as the
co-manager.

A registration statement relating to these securities was declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
Nov. 16, 2016.  The offering is being made only by means of a
prospectus forming part of the effective registration statement.
Copies of the final prospectus relating to the offering, when
available, may be obtained for free by visiting the SEC's website
at http://www.sec.gov,or alternatively from the offices of Roth
Capital Partners, LLC, 888 San Clemente Drive, Newport Beach, CA
92660, or by telephone at (800) 678-9147.

                       About AmpliPhi

AmpliPhi Biosciences Corp. is a biotechnology company focused on
the discovery, development and commercialization of novel phage
therapeutics.  Its principal offices occupy approximately 1,000
square feet of leased office space pursuant to a month-to-month
sublease, located at 3579 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 100, San
Diego, California.  It also leases approximately 700 square feet of
lab space in Richmond, Virginia, approximately 5,000 square feet of
lab space in Brookvale, Australia, and approximately 6,000 square
feet of lab and office space in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had $26.03 million in total
assets, $7.80 million in total liabilities and $18.22 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Ampliphi reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$10.79 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to net
income attributable to common stockholders of $21.82 million.

"[T]he Company has incurred net losses since its inception, has
negative operating cash flows and has an accumulated deficit of
$371.9 million as of September 30, 2016, $56.4 million of which has
been accumulated since January of 2011, when the Company began its
focus on bacteriophage development.  As of September 30, 2016, the
Company had cash and cash equivalents of $4.0 million. Management
believes that the Company's existing resources will be sufficient
to fund the Company's planned operations through the end of 2016.
These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern," as disclosed in the
Company's quarterly report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2016.


AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES: Settles "NRM VII" Litigation for $2 Million
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov. 12, 2016, NRM VII Holdings I, LLC, entered into a
settlement agreement with respect to the lawsuit filed against the
Company and the members of its Board of Directors.  NRM VII
Holdings agreed to dismiss with prejudice the lawsuit against the
Company and pursuant to the settlement agreement the Company agreed
to make a cash payment to NRM VII Holdings in the amount of $2
million.

The settlement agreement contains mutual releases covering all
claims that the Company or Company Released Parties, or NRM VII
Holdings or NRM VII Released Parties, have or may have against the
other party or released parties in connection with the lawsuit or
otherwise as of the date of the settlement agreement.  Company
Released Parties is defined as M. Scott Salka, Wendy Johnson,
Jeremy Curnock Cook, Louis Drapeau, Paul C. Grint, Michael S.
Perry, and Vijay Samant, and its and their respective assignees,
heirs, predecessors, corporate parents, corporate subsidiaries, and
all of those entities' current and former officers, directors,
managing agents, members, shareholders, successors, assigns,
employees, agents, attorneys and insurers.  NRM VII Released
Parties is defined as Third Security, LLC, Randal J. (RJ) Kirk,
Julian Kirk, and their respective assignees, heirs, predecessors,
corporate parents, corporate subsidiaries, and all of those
entities' current and former officers, directors, managing agents,
members, shareholders, successors, assigns, employees, agents, and
attorneys.

The Reporting Persons may, from time to time, depending upon market
conditions and other factors deemed relevant by the Reporting
Persons, engage in transactions in the Common Stock in the open
market or in privately negotiated transactions.
A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                      https://is.gd/PSqZ6K

                         About AmpliPhi

AmpliPhi Biosciences Corp. is a biotechnology company focused on
the discovery, development and commercialization of novel phage
therapeutics.  Its principal offices occupy approximately 1,000
square feet of leased office space pursuant to a month-to-month
sublease, located at 3579 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 100, San
Diego, California.  It also leases approximately 700 square feet of
lab space in Richmond, Virginia, approximately 5,000 square feet of
lab space in Brookvale, Australia, and approximately 6,000 square
feet of lab and office space in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had $26.03 million in total
assets, $7.80 million in total liabilities and $18.22 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Ampliphi reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$10.79 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to net
income attributable to common stockholders of $21.82 million.

"[T]he Company has incurred net losses since its inception, has
negative operating cash flows and has an accumulated deficit of
$371.9 million as of September 30, 2016, $56.4 million of which has
been accumulated since January of 2011, when the Company began its
focus on bacteriophage development.  As of September 30, 2016, the
Company had cash and cash equivalents of $4.0 million. Management
believes that the Company's existing resources will be sufficient
to fund the Company's planned operations through the end of 2016.
These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern," as disclosed in the
Company's quarterly report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2016.


ATHABASCA OIL: DBRS Confirms 'B' Issuer Rating
----------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed the Issuer Rating and Senior Secured
Second-Lien Notes (the Senior Notes) rating of Athabasca Oil
Corporation (Athabasca or the Company) at B (low). All trends
remain Negative, and the Recovery Rating on the Senior Notes
remains RR4. As noted in DBRS's October 26, 2016, press release
("DBRS Takes Rating Actions on High-Yield Oil & Gas Portfolio"),
the Negative trend reflects the refinancing risk related to the
Company's $550 million Senior Notes that mature in November 2017.
Since that press release, Athabasca has raised $129 million in cash
from the sale of an additional royalty interest on the Company's
thermal oil assets. However, DBRS notes that should the Company
choose to repay the Senior Notes from its cash balance of now
approximately $700 million, it may not have sufficient liquidity to
fund the capital expenditures planned through to the end of 2017.
The Company has indicated plans to refinance the Senior Notes
before year end. If Athabasca resolves the refinancing risk by
successfully executing a plan to repay and refinance the Senior
Notes, DBRS will consider changing the trend to Stable.

DBRS does note that Athabasca has taken several steps this year to
significantly improve liquidity, including the $486 million in net
consideration received for a light crude oil joint venture with
Murphy Oil Corporation and the $257 million in cash from Burgess
Energy Holdings L.L.C. for a Contingent Bitumen Royalty on the
Company's thermal oil assets. In addition, the Company repaid $287
million of term debt this year.

The Company plans to significantly grow production with the (1)
ramp-up of thermal oil production at the Hangingstone Steam
Assisted Gravity Drainage project and (2) development of light oil
and liquids-rich gas from the Duvernay and Montney resource plays
in the Greater Kaybob and Greater Placid areas. Hangingstone is
approximately 15 months into its production ramp-up. Design
capacity of 12,000 barrels per day is expected to be reached in
2018 versus previous expectations of late 2016/early 2017. The
Company expects the development of the Montney and Duvernay
resource plays to drive material production growth for several
years. Cash flow from operations is expected to swing from a
deficit this year to modestly positive next year on the assumption
that (1) the price of West Texas Intermediate oil averages USD
50.00 per barrel or higher and Alberta gas averages approximately
$3.00 per thousand cubic feet and (2) the Company increases
production as planned. In both 2016 and 2017, DBRS anticipates the
Company will incur sizable free cash flow deficits (cash flow less
capital expenditures). Any challenges or delays in increasing
production volumes or a weaker pricing environment could have a
material impact on the Company's ability to become cash flow
positive and thus have an adverse impact on liquidity.

Notes: All figures are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.


RATINGS

Issuer             Debt Rated         Rating Action         Rating
------             ----------         -------------         ------
Athabasca          Issuer Rating       Confirmed            B(low)
Oil Corporation

Athabasca          Senior Secured      Confirmed            B(low)
Oil Corporation    Second-Lien Notes


ATLAS FINANCIAL: A.M. Best Affirms 'B' Finc'l. Strength Rating
--------------------------------------------------------------
A.M. Best has affirmed the Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of B
(Fair) and Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating (Long-Term ICR) of "bb"
of American Service Insurance Company, Inc., American Country
Insurance Company (both domiciled in Elk Grove Village, IL) and
Gateway Insurance Company (St. Louis, MO), collectively referred to
as American Service Pool (ASI Pool). The outlook of these Credit
Ratings (ratings) is stable. These companies are subsidiaries of
Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc. (Atlas) (Cayman Islands)
[NASDAQ:AFH], and operate under an intercompany reinsurance pooling
agreement. Concurrently, A.M. Best has also affirmed the Long-Term
ICR of "b-" of Atlas. The outlook of this rating is stable.

At the same time, A.M. Best has affirmed the FSR of B+ (Good) and
the Long-Term ICR of "bbb-" of Global Liberty Insurance Company of
New York (Global) (Melville, NY), another wholly owned subsidiary
of Atlas. The outlook of these ratings is negative.

The affirmations of the ASI Pool member's ratings reflect the
group's volatile, and at times weak risk-adjusted capital position,
inherent risks associated with integrating recent acquisitions and
the group's below average investment yields and returns on its
investment portfolio. These negative rating factors are partially
offset by the steadily improving underwriting and operating
performance over the past five years and management's extensive
experience and expertise in its niche market serving the public
"for hire" auto market.

The Pool's volatile, and at times, weak risk-adjusted capital
position was the result of achieving significant premium growth
over the past several years through an acquisition by its parent,
Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc. Atlas purchased Gateway Insurance in
2013, elevating the execution risks associated with integrating
this business into existing infrastructure. Atlas also purchased
Global in 2015, which could potentially place additional demand on
Atlas' management. However, the capital position of the pool was
significantly improved in 2015, as a result of the issuance of
three surplus notes from the Pool to its parent, totaling $15.5
million. Also of concern is the pool's investment portfolio, which
is heavily weighted towards bonds, leaving investment income growth
highly contingent upon currently low interest rate levels. This
greatly increases the pool's reliance on underwriting income to
fuel surplus growth.

The improved operating results, beginning in 2012, demonstrate
Atlas' strategic focus on its historically profitable lines of
business, while running off non-core lines and books of business
produced by managing and general agents. Favorable underwriting
performance drove the improved results with the cancellation of
unprofitable business, base rate increases, fraud mitigation, the
absence of significant reserve strengthening and greater geographic
diversification. The expense ratio reduction was primarily due to
the efficiencies gained through premium growth that occurred with
the recapture of previously lost business.

Positive rating movement is possible if the company sustains
continued improvement in operating performance or shows additional
improvements in its risk-adjusted capitalization levels. The
ratings could be negatively impacted by deterioration in
underwriting and operating results, a developing trend of material
adverse loss development, or if the pool's risk-adjusted
capitalization deteriorates to a level that no longer supports the
current ratings.

The ratings for Global reflect its expertise within the New York
City metropolitan area's for-hire-livery vehicle market and
improved capital position as a result of a $3.5 million capital
infusion made by its new parent, Atlas. These positive rating
factors are offset by Global's volatile underwriting and operating
results in recent years, driven mainly by unfavorable prior year
loss reserve development related primarily to assigned risk and
run-off business, which resulted in declines in surplus in 2012 and
2013. Additionally, Global has reported historically low
risk-adjusted capitalization, driven by substantial growth in net
premiums written as a result of the cancellation of quota share
reinsurance in prior years. Although Atlas' management is committed
to initiating appropriate actions in order to improve performance
and reduce volatility, the negative outlook reflects A.M. Best's
concern regarding the adequacy of Global's loss reserves and recent
volatility in underwriting and operating performance.


AURORA DIAGNOSTICS: S&P Lowers CCR to 'CCC' on High Default Risk
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit rating on Palm
Beach Gardens, Fla.-based Aurora Diagnostic Holdings LLC to 'CCC'
from 'CCC+'.  The outlook is negative.

At the same time, S&P lowered its ratings on the company's senior
secured credit facility, issued by operating company Aurora
Diagnostics LLC, to 'CCC+' from 'B-'.  The recovery rating on this
debt remains '2', reflecting S&P's expectation for substantial
(70%-90%, in the lower half of the range) recovery in the event of
payment default.  S&P also lowered its issue-level rating on Aurora
Diagnostic Holdings' senior unsecured notes to 'CC' from 'CCC-'.
The recovery rating on this debt remains '6', reflecting S&P's
expectation for negligible (0%-10%) recovery on this debt in the
event of default.

"Our rating actions reflect the shortening window of time during
which the company must refinance its capital structure," said S&P
Global Ratings credit analyst Shannan Murphy.  While the earliest
stated maturity is Aurora's senior notes, which mature in 2018, the
company's senior secured credit facilities are subject to a
springing maturity in October 2017 if its senior notes are not
refinanced by that time.

S&P's negative rating outlook reflects its view that Aurora's
capital structure is not sustainable over the long term, and the
company will be challenged to refinance its debt October 2017
springing maturity date given already very high leverage and
persistent reimbursement pressures.

S&P could lower the rating if deteriorating operating performance
led it to believe that default risk was elevated in the near term.
S&P could also lower the rating if more time passes without a
successful debt refinancing.  S&P would likely lower the rating if
the company fails to complete a debt refinancing by April 2017
(within six months of the springing maturity date).

S&P could raise the rating if the company is able to successfully
complete a refinancing of its capital structure.  To the extent
that this refinancing allowed the company to maintain access to
backup liquidity and generate a very modest amount of positive free
cash flow, S&P could consider a multiple-notch upgrade.


AYTU BIOSCIENCE: Stockholders Elect Five Directors
--------------------------------------------------
Aytu BioScience, Inc., held its 2016 annual meeting of stockholders

on Nov. 15, 2016, at which the stockholders elected Gary V.
Cantrell, Joshua R. Disbrow, Carl C. Dockery, John A. Donofrio,
Jr., and Michael Macaluso as directors.

Also at the meeting, the Company's stockholders took the following
actions:

   * Approved, by a majority of the shares of the Company's
     outstanding capital stock, an amendment to its Certificate of
     Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split at a ratio of
     any whole number between 1-for-2 and 1-for-4, as determined
     by the board of directors, at any time before Nov. 15, 2017,
     if and as determined by the board of directors;

   * Approved, by a majority of the shares voting at the meeting,
     amendments to the Company's 2015 Stock Option and Incentive
     Plan to (i) increase the number of authorized shares of
     common stock reserved for issuance thereunder from 833,334
     shares to 2,000,000 shares, (ii) increase the number of
     shares that may be issued as incentive stock options from
     833,334 shares to 2,000,000 shares, and (iii) increase the
     maximum number of shares of common stock (A) underlying stock
     options or stock appreciation rights that may be granted to
     any one individual during any calendar year period, and (B)
     granted to any one individual that is intended to qualify as
    "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the
     Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for any
     performance cycle, in each case from 166,667 shares to
     1,000,000 shares; and

   * Ratified, by a majority of the shares voting at the meeting,
     the appointment of EKS&H, LLLP as the Company's independent
     registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
     June 30, 2017.

                      About Aytu Bioscience

Aytu BioScience, Inc. (OTCMKTS:AYTU) is a commercial-stage
specialty healthcare company concentrating on developing and
commercializing products with an initial focus on urological
diseases and conditions.  Aytu is currently focused on addressing
significant medical needs in the areas of urological cancers,
hypogonadism, urinary tract infections, male infertility, and
sexual dysfunction.

Aytu Bioscience reported a net loss of $28.18 million for the year
ended June 30, 2016, following a net loss of $7.72 million for the
year ended June 30, 2015.

As of June 30, 2016, Aytu Bioscience had $24.34 million in total
assets, $14.25 million in total liabilities and $10.08 million in
total stockholders' equity.

EKS&H LLLP, in Denver, Colorado, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended June 30, 2016, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


BALTAZAR MARTINEZ: Unsecureds To Get Pro Rata Share of $1,500
-------------------------------------------------------------
Baltazar Martinez and Angelica Martinez filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada a disclosure statement
referring to the Debtors' plan of reorganization.

All Class 3 General Unsecured Claims having filed proofs of claim
by Aug. 19, 2015, or deemed to have filed proofs of claim, that are
not disputed, contingent, unliquidated, or otherwise approved by
court order, will be paid their pro rata share of $1,500, which is
the projected disposable income of the Debtor over the five-year
period starting on the date that the first payment is due under the
Plan.  No interest will be paid to Class 3 creditors.  Class 3 is
an impaired class under the Plan.

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb15-12161-81.pdf

The Plan was filed by the Debtors' counsel:

     Michael J. Harker, Esq.
     THE LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL J. HARKER
     2901 El Camino Avenue No. 200
     Las Vegas, NV 89102
     Tel: (702) 248-3000
     Fax: (702) 425-7290
     E-mail: mharker@harkerlawfirm.com

Baltzar Martinez and Angelica Martinez are a married couple.  Mr.
Martinez has worked as a driver Delivery Man for JFC International
for over a year.  Mrs. Martinez has worked as a Food Preparer at
Sam's Town Hotel & Casino for over 20 years.  The Debtors also have
an investment property located at 528 Prescott Street, Las Vegas,
Nevada 89110.  The property is rented and also generates income fro
the Debtors.

The Debtors filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Nev. Case No. 15-12161) on April 17, 2015.


BARLEN PG: Consigning Equipment to Michigan CAT to Pay IRS Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Barlen P.G., Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Michigan to authorize the consignment of its equipment
to Michigan CAT to pay the prepetition claims held by the IRS
against the Debtor.

The Court confirmed Debtor's First Amended Chapter 11 Plan and
Disclosure Statement on July 12, 2013.

On Jan. 16, 2014, the Court administratively closed Debtor's
Chapter 11 case.  Pursuant to the Order Confirming Plan, the Debtor
had priority and wholly unsecured tax claims owing to the United
States-Internal Revenue Service.  Notwithstanding the fact that the
IRS's tax liens were subordinate to other secured claims, the
Debtor consented to allow the IRS to retain its liens on Debtor's
property until said claim(s) was paid in full.  

The IRS' total filed claims against all three jointly administered
Debtors, including the Debtor, was approximately $344,300, against
which the Debtor has timely paid $226,038 (3 annual payments of
$75,346).  The Debtor is current with all payments to the IRS, the
next being due no later than Jan. 31, 2017.

The Debtor now has received an offer to consign to Michigan CAT a
significant number of its equipment and property, which is sold as
priced pursuant to the consignment agreements will yield a gross
sales price of $233,680.  However, the purchaser requires that
either the tax liens first be released or debtor obtains an order
from the Court allowing for the sale free and clear of said liens.

A copy of the consignment agreements and the list of equipment to
be sold thru Michigan CAT attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/Barlen_PG_145_Sales.pdf

The Debtor wishes to sell said property for these reason(s) and
under these circumstance(s), to wit: The Debtor and affiliates have
lost their annual contract with Johnson Controls and have therefore
ceased operating its snow removal operations.  They therefore
entered into a brokerage/consignment agreement with Michigan Cat,
wherein the Debtors have consigned all their snow removal equipment
to Michigan Cat, which will attempt to sell it for the sale prices
listed, infra in attached proposed sales list and earn a 10%
commission for doing so to be paid out of the sale proceeds.
Although not required by the terms of the confirmed plan to do so,
it is the Debtors' intent to pay the sale proceeds to the IRS up to
the balance of its duly allowed claim, which in doing so, will
assist the Debtor is fulfilling all other obligations set forth in
the confirmed combined Chapter 11 Plan of reorganization.  The
equipment will be marketed to several buyers and the sales efforts
will continue until all of the equipment is sold.

The Debtor, through counsel, has twice attempted to contact the
IRS, through the United States Attorneys Office, to obtain consent
to release the IRS liens pending the sale of the property listed;
however, such consent could not be obtained.

The Debtor asks the Court to approve the sale of the property.
Upon sale said items, all net proceeds, up and to the amount(s)
owed to the IRS for its filed and allowed claims will be turned
over to the IRS; concurrently the IRS would issue either a
satisfaction and/or release of all Federal Tax Liens filed against
these jointly administered Debtors, Barlen, P.G., Inc., Barlen
Contracting, Inc., and Barlen Sanitation Solutions, Inc.

The Debtor reasonably believes the proposed sale proceeds will be
equal to or greater than the current balances still owing to the
IRS.  Further, that Debtor will pay all required UST quarterly fees
that may be applicable first from the sale proceeds of the
consigned equipment.  Accordingly, the Debtor asks the Court to
grant its Amended Motion and for what further relief the Court
deems equitable and just.

                        About Barlen P.G.

Barlen P.G., Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Mich.
Case No. 12-66590) on Dec. 7, 2012.  Judge Thomas J. Tucker is
assigned to the case.

The Debtor estimated assets in the range of $0 to $50,000 and
$1,000,001 to $10,000,000 in debt.

The Debtor tapped William R. Orlow, Esq. at B.O.C. Law Group,
P.C.,
as counsel.

The petition was signed by Joe C. Ballenger Jr./Joe C. Ballinger
Sr., president/CEO.


BCDG LP: Status Hearing on Cash Collateral Use Set on Nov. 29
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Anita L. Shodeen of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Iowa, after a telephonic hearing on Nov. 21,
2016 on BCDG, LP's Cash Collateral Motion, directed the parties to
submit a stipulation or consent order for the interim use of cash
collateral by Nov. 23, 2016.

A status conference on the Debtor's use of cash collateral will be
conducted by phone on Nov. 29, 2016 at 3:00 p.m.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Nov. 11, 2016, is available at

http://bankrupt.com/misc/BCDGLP2016_1602263als11_24.pdf

                      About BCDG, LP

BCDG, LP dba McDonald's filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
Iowa Case No. 16-02263) on Nov. 18, 2016.  The petition was signed
by Brown Customer Delight Group, Inc., general partner.  The Debtor
is represented by Jeffrey D. Goetz, Esq., Chet A. Mellema, Esq.,
and Krystal R. Mikkilineni, Esq., at Bradshaw, Fowler, Proctor &
Fairgrave PC.  The Debtor disclosed total assets at $6.70 million
and total liabilities at $15.62 million.


BEST LIFE: A.M. Best Affirms B(Fair) Financial Strength Rating
--------------------------------------------------------------
A.M. Best has revised the outlooks to positive from stable and
affirmed the Financial Strength Rating of B (Fair) and the
Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating of "bb+" of BEST Life and Health
Insurance Company (BEST Life) (Austin, TX).

The positive outlooks reflect BEST Life becoming a niche player in
the dental Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)
exchange markets that it operates in, continued strong capital
growth and an improved near-term earnings trend. BEST Life has
increased penetration of dental products in its priority states,
especially in the dental ACA marketplace, and has expanded its
offerings geographically by entering dental ACA markets in
additional states in 2016. The company also has demonstrated a
trend of strong capital growth over the past five years largely due
to improved operating results and a lack of dividends up-streamed
to its parent company, Pension Administrators Inc. Over the past
two years, BEST Life has experienced its strongest results,
primarily driven by profitability from its dental lines of business
while exiting unprofitable lines of business.

The Credit Ratings (ratings) reflect BEST Life's solid
risk-adjusted capitalization attributable to recent strong earnings
and its shift from a major medical carrier to a primarily dental
carrier. Furthermore, the ratings reflect the company's ability to
continue to manage and reduce expenses through the relocation and
consolidation of operations.

Offsetting rating factors include very small market share in a
competitive dental segment, a lack of diversification in earnings
premium and a recent decline in premiums. Additionally, there is a
risk of larger carriers previously focused on medical ACA products
increasing focus on the dental segment in the markets where BEST
Life operates, potentially resulting in pricing pressure and
membership losses.


BH SUTTON: Auction Sale of New York Properties on Dec. 8 Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Sean H. Lane of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York authorized the public auction sale of BH
Sutton Mezz, LLC's, Sutton 58 Owner,
http://writenewsnow.com/wp-admin/post-new.phpLLC'sand Sutton 58
Owner, LLC's real properties located at, and known as, 428, 430 and
432 East 58th Street, New York, New York; and all zoning and
development rights owned by or available to the Debtors and/or to
which the Debtors have a right, title and interest in.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Nov. 21, 2016.

The Limited Objection of 434 East 58th Street Owners, Inc. to the
Amended Motion [Dkt. No. 299] is resolved as set forth at the
hearing.

The Terms and Conditions of Sale are approved and the Debtors are
authorized to conduct the Auction Sale of the assets in accordance
with the Terms and Conditions of Sale.

A copy of the Terms and Conditions of Sale attached to the Order is
available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/BH_Sutton_301_Order.pdf

The Auction Sale of the assets is on Dec. 8, 2016.  However, the
Auction Sale may be adjourned for up to one week such that it
occurs on Dec. 15, 2016 in accordance with the Terms and Conditions
of Sale.

On Nov. 22, 2016, the Debtors will cause a Notice to Creditors and
Other Parties in Interest of Public Auction Sale to be served on
all interested parties.

              About BH Sutton and Sutton 58 Owner

New York City-based BH Sutton Mezz LLC filed for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-10455) on Feb. 26, 2016.
The petition was signed by Herman Carlinsky, president.  The Hon.
Sean H. Lane presides over the case.  Joseph S. Maniscalco, Esq.,
at Lamonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP, represents BH Sutton in its
restructuring effort.  The Debtor estimated assets at $100
million to $500 million and debts at $10 million to $50 million.

Sutton 58 Owner LLC filed a separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-10834) on April 6, 2016.  Sutton
Owner
estimated assets at $100 million to $500 million and debts at $100
million to $500 million.  Sutton Owner's business consists of the
ownership and operation of these real properties: (a) 428, 430 and
432 East 58th Street, New York, New York, 10022, including all air
rights and inclusionary air rights related thereto; and (b) the
cooperative apartments identified as 1R, 2D and 2N located at 504
Merrick Road, Lynbrook, New York 11583.  Sutton Owner seeks to
retain Joseph S. Maniscalco, Esq., and Jordan C. Pilevsky, Esq.,
at
Lamonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP, as its counsel.

Both cases are jointly administered.


BIG APPLE CIRCUS: Can Get $66,058 DIP Loan on Interim Basis
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Sean H. Lane of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York authorized The Big Apple Circus, Ltd., to
obtain interest-free postpetition financing from its Directors, in
the maximum aggregate amount of $66,058.

The DIP Loan matures upon the closing of the sale of the Debtor's
Walden Property and is secured by a lien on the Walden Property
that is junior only to valid, enforceable, perfected and
non-avoidable third-party liens.

Judge Lane held that the Debtor's obligation to repay the DIP Loan
will constitute an allowed super-priority administrative expense
claim against the Debtor's estate, with priority over any and all
administrative expenses and all other claims asserted against the
Debtor, including all other administrative expenses of the kind
specified in Sections 503(b) and 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The final hearing on the Debtor's Motion is scheduled on Dec. 14,
2016 at 10:00 a.m.  The deadline for the filing of objections to
the Debtor's Motion is set on Dec. 7, 2016 at 4:00 p.m.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order, dated Nov. 22, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/BigAppleCircus2016_1613297shl_16.pdf

                  About The Big Apple Circus, Ltd.

The Big Apple Circus, Ltd., filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-13297) on Nov. 20, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Will Maitland Weiss, executive director.  The Debtor is
represented by Natasha M. Labovitz, Esq. and Christopher Updike,
Esq., at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP.  The Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million at the time of the filing.


BIG APPLE CIRCUS: Dec. 6 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
-------------------------------------------------------------
William K. Harrington, United States Trustee for Region 2, will
hold an organizational meeting on Dec. 6, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. in
the bankruptcy case of The Big Apple Circus, Ltd.

The meeting will be held at:

            United States Bankruptcy Court
            One Bowling Green, Room 511
            New York, NY 10004

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

                About The Big Apple Circus, Ltd.

The Big Apple Circus, Ltd. filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-13297) on Nov. 20, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Will Maitland Weiss, executive director.  The Debtor is
represented by Natasha M. Labovitz, Esq. and Christopher Updike,
Esq., at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP.  The Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million at the time of the
filing.



BIOCORRX INC: Incurs $2.60 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
BioCorRx Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission its
quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $2.60
million on $167,600 of net revenues for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $697,500 on $118,200 of
net revenues for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss of $4.21 million on $585,900 of net revenues compared to a
net loss of $4.67 million on $851,400 of net revenues for the same
period a year ago.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Biocorrx had $629,900 in total assets, $7.57
million in total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of
$6.94 million.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/rnI91e

                      About Biocorrx Inc.

Through its wholly owned subsidiary, BioCorRx Inc. distributes and
licenses the BioCorRxO Recovery Program for alcoholism and opioid
addiction treatment headquartered in Santa Ana, California.  The
Company was established in January 2010 and are currently operating
in Santa Ana, California.  The Company developed the BioCorRxO
Recovery Program for the treatment of alcoholism and opioid
addiction consisting of a Naltrexone implant that is placed under
the skin in the lower abdomen coupled with a counseling/life
coaching program including sessions (16 sessions on average but not
limited to) from specialized life coaches and/or counselors.

BiocorRx reported a net loss of $4.66 million in 2015 following a
net loss of $3.12 million in 2014.

Liggett & Webb, P.A., New York, New York, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net working capital deficiency
that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


BOSS INVESTMENTS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Nov. 23 disclosed in a court
filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Boss Investments, LLC.

Boss Investments, LLC, based in Gilbert, AZ, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 16-12290) on October 26, 2016.
The Hon. Madeleine C. Wanslee presides over the case. Daniel R.
Warner, at Kelly Warner, PLLC, as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Michael
Harris, manager.


BPS US HOLDINGS: Hires Young Conaway as Co-counsel
--------------------------------------------------
BPS US Holdings, Inc., et al., seek authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as co-counsel to the Debtors.

BPS US Holdings requires Young Conaway to:

   a. provide legal advice and services regarding local rules,
      practices, and procedures and providing substantive and
      strategic advice on how to accomplish the Debtors' goals in
      connection with the prosecution of the cases, bearing in
      mind that the Court relies on co-counsel such as Young
      Conaway to be involved in all aspects of each bankruptcy
      proceeding;

   b. review, comment, and prepare drafts of documents to be
      filed with the Court as co-counsel to the Debtors;

   c. appear in Court and at any meeting with the U.S. Trustee
      and any meeting of creditors at any given time on behalf of
      the Debtors as their co-counsel;

   d. perform various services in connection with the
      administration of the bankruptcy cases, including, without
      limitation, (i) prepare agenda letters, certificates of no
      objection, certifications of counsel, notices of fee
      applications and hearings, and hearing binders of
      documents and pleadings; (ii) monitor the docket for
      filings and coordinating with Paul Weiss on pending
      matters that need responses; (iii) prepare and maintaining
      critical dates memoranda to monitor pending applications,
      motions, hearing dates, and other matters and the
      deadlines associated with the same; (iv) handle inquiries
      and calls from creditors and counsel to interested parties
      regarding pending matters and the general status of the
      bankruptcy cases; and (v) coordinate with Paul Weiss on
      any necessary responses;

   e. prepare and prosecute chapter 11 plans; and

   f. perform all other services assigned by the Debtors, in
      consultation with Paul Weiss, to Young Conaway as co-
      counsel to the Debtors.

Young Conaway will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Pauline K. Morgan                   $850
     Sean T. Greecher                    $550
     Justin H. Rucki                     $460
     Shane M. Reil                       $345
     Casey Cathcart, Paralegal           $235

Young Conaway will be paid a retainer in the amount of $100,000.

Young Conaway will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for Reviewing Applications
for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 330 for Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, the
following is provided in response to the request for additional
information:

     a. Young Conaway has not agreed to a variation of its
        standard or customary billing arrangements for this
        engagement;

     b. None of the Firm's professionals included in this
        engagement have varied their rate based on the geographic
        location of the Chapter 11 Cases;

     c. Young Conaway was retained by the Debtors pursuant to an
        engagement agreement dated as of September 1, 2016. The
        billing rates and material terms of the prepetition
        engagement are the same as the rates and terms described
        in the Application and herein;

     d. The Debtors have approved or will be approving a
        prospective budget and staffing plan for Young Conaway's
        engagement for the postpetition period as appropriate. In
        accordance with the U.S. Trustee Guidelines, the budget
        may be amended as necessary to reflect changed or
        unanticipated developments.

Pauline K. Morgan, member of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a)
are not creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the
Debtor; (b) have not been, within two years before the date of the
filing of the Debtor's chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or
employees of the Debtor; and (c) do not have an interest materially
adverse to the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors
or equity security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect
relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the Debtor, or
for any other reason.

Young Conaway can be reached at:

     Pauline K. Morgan, Esq.
     Sean T. Greecher, Esq.
     Justin H. Rucki, Esq.
     Shane M. Reil, Esq.
     YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
     Rodney Square
     1000 North King Street
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Tel: (302) 571-6600
     Fax: (302) 571-1253

                       About BPS US Holdings

Exeter, N.H.-based Performance Sports Group Ltd. (NYSE: PSG) (TSX:
PSG) -- http://www.PerformanceSportsGroup.com/-- is a developer
and manufacturer of ice hockey, roller hockey, lacrosse, baseball
and softball sports equipment, as well as related apparel and
soccer apparel. Its products are marketed under the BAUER, MISSION,
MAVERIK, CASCADE, INARIA, COMBAT and EASTON brand names and are
distributed by sales representatives and independent distributors
throughout the world. In addition, the Company distributes its
hockey products through its Burlington, Massachusetts and
Bloomington, Minnesota Own The Moment Hockey Experience retail
stores.

On Oct. 31, 2016, Performance Sports Group Ltd. and certain of its
affiliates have filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the District of Delaware and commenced
proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

The U.S. Debtors are: BPS US Holdings Inc.; Bauer Hockey, Inc.;
Easton Baseball/Softball Inc.; Bauer Hockey Retail Inc.; Bauer
Performance Sports Uniforms Inc.; Performance Lacrosse Group Inc.;
BPS Diamond Sports Inc.; and PSG Innovation Inc.

The Canadian Debtors are: Performance Sports Group Ltd.; KBAU
Holdings Canada, Inc.; Bauer Hockey Retail Corp.; Easton Baseball
/Softball Corp.; PSG Innovation Corp. Bauer Hockey Corp.; BPS
Canada Intermediate Corp.; BPS Diamond Sports Corp.; Bauer
Performance Sports Uniforms Corp.; and Performance Lacrosse Group
Corp.

The Debtors have hired Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
as counsel; Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as co-counsel;
Stikeman Elliott LLP as Canadian legal counsel; Centerview LLP as
investment banker to the special committee; Alvarez & Marsal North
America, LLC, as restructuring advisor; Joele Frank, Wilkinson,
Brimmer, Katcher as communications & relations advisor; KPMG LLP as
auditors; Ernst & Young LLP as CCAA monitor; and Prime Clerk LLC as
notice, claims, solicitation and balloting agent.


BRAZIL MINERALS: Peter Goldy Reports 8.61% Stake as of Nov. 16
--------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Peter Kristofer Goldy disclosed that as of Nov. 16,
2016, he beneficially owns 1,101,818,182 shares of common stock of
Brazil Minerals, Inc., which represents 8.61 percent of the shares
outstanding.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is
available for free at https://is.gd/hDPgkh


                      About Brazil Minerals

Brazil Minerals, Inc., through subsidiaries, mines and sells
diamonds, gold, sand and mortar.  The Company, through
subsidiaries, outright or jointly owns 11 mining concessions and 20
other mineral rights in Brazil, almost all for diamonds and gold.
The Company, through subsidiaries, owns a large alluvial diamond
and gold processing and recovery plant, a sand processing and
mortar plant, and several pieces of earth-moving capital equipment
used for mining as well as machines for sand processing and
preparation of mortar.

As of June 30, 2016, Brazil Minerals had $1.28 million in total
assets, $1.72 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $439,087.

Brazil Minerals reported a net loss of $1.87 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015, following a net loss of $3.42 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

B F Borgers CPA PC, in Lakewood, CO, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a significant accumulated deficit.
In addition, the Company continues to experience negative cash
flows from operations.  These factors raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


BUFFETS LLC: Creditors' Committee Calls for Ch. 11 Trustee
----------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Buffets, LLC, et
al., filed a motion asking the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Texas to appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee for
Buffets, LLC, and its debtor affiliates.

The Debtors, which own and operate various buffet concept
restaurants, are part of a group of closely held businesses, all of
which are owned and controlled by a handful of individual
investors, i.e., the Partners.

According to the Committee, the Partners caused the Debtors to
enter into loan transactions despite the acknowledgement (at
deposition) of their chief finance and accounting officer, Bob
Amaro, that no third party lender in their right mind would have
made the loans given the financial profile of the Debtors.

Moreover, the Debtors' management have numerous conflicts of
interest with the Debtor, the Creditor's Committee asserts.  The
Committee further asserts that as a result of these conflicts, the
Debtors' management have eschewed their fiduciary duties as
managers officers and directors of the Debtors, both before and
during the Debtors' bankruptcy cases, and sought exclusively to
promote and protect their own interests to the detriment of the
Debtors and arms-length creditors and parties in interest.

Therefore, the Creditors Committee asks the Court to (1) enter an
order that a chapter 11 trustee be appointed, and (2) grant such
other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

              About Buffets LLC

Buffets LLC, et al., are one of the largest operators of
buffet-style restaurants in the U.S.  The buffet restaurants,
located in 25 states, principally operate under the names Old
Country  Buffet(R), Country Buffet(R), HomeTown(R) Buffet,
Ryan's(R) and Fire Mountain(R).  These locations primarily offer
self-service buffets with entrees, sides, and desserts for an
all-inclusive price.  In addition, Buffets owns and operates an
10-unit full service, casual dining chain under the name Tahoe
Joe's Famous Steakhouse(R).

Buffets Holdings, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 relief in January 2008
and won confirmation of a reorganization plan in April 2009. In
January 2012, Buffets again sought Chapter 11 protection and
emerged from bankruptcy in July 2012.

In Aug. 19, 2015, Alamo Ovation, LLC acquired Buffets Restaurants
Holdings, Inc., and as a result of the merger, Buffets operated
over 300 restaurants in 35 states.

Down to 150 restaurants in 25 states after closing unprofitable
locations, Buffets LLC and its affiliated entities sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. Lead Case No. 16-50557) in
San Antonio, Texas, on March 7, 2016.  The cases are assigned to
Judge Ronald B. King.

The Debtors have tapped Akerman, LLP as counsel, Bridgepoint
Consulting, LLC as financial advisor and Donlin, Recano & Company
as claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee on March 21, 2016, appointed Van Eerden
Foodservice Company, Heather Gage, Bryce King, Realty Income
Corporation, Windstream, Automatic Data Processing, Inc., and
Edward Don & Company as members of the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee appointed Greenberg Traurig,
LLP as counsel.

                       *     *     *

Buffets, LLC, et al., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Texas a Joint Plan of Reorganization and
Disclosure Statement, which proposes a return of approximately 5%
to general unsecured creditors with possible upside from
litigation
recoveries.  The aggregate amount of general unsecured claims is
estimated at $100 million to $115 million.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Sept. 30, 2016, is
available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb16-50557-1113.pdf  


C & D PRODUCE: Gordon Foods Seeks Dismissal, Ch. 11 Trustee
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Foods Services, Inc., filed a motion asking the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to dismiss
the Chapter 11 case of C & D Produce Outlet - South, Inc., or, in
the alternative, direct the appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee for
the Debtor.

Gordon Foods holds a secured claim against the Debtor in the amount
of $79,401.42.  According to Gordon Foods, the Debtor has been
utilizing its cash collateral with the permission of the Court.
However, a review of the Monthly Operating Reports clearly
evidences the fact that the Debtor is incapable of properly
managing its affairs. Several major glaring issues are shown by the
MOR, Gordon Foods tells the Court.

Gordon Foods asserts that if the Court decides not to dismiss the
Case, the Court must enter an order appointing a Chapter 11
trustee.  The appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee is necessary to
ensure, among other things, that: (a) the Debtor's account is
properly managed; (b) MOR's are timely and properly prepared; (c)
the Debtor has all necessary insurance; (d) rent is being paid; (e)
Federal and State taxes are being collected, reported and remitted;
and (f) The employees' checks do not continue to be dishonored,
Gordon Foods further asserts.

Gordon Foods is represented by:

         Roniel Rodriguez, IV, Esq.
         RONIEL RODRIGUEZ, IV, P.A.
         12555 Biscayne Boulevard, #915,
         North Miami, FL 33181
         Phone: 305-773-4875
         Fax: 305-359-5196
         Email: Ron@RJRfirm.com

               About C & D Produce Outlet, Inc.

C & D Produce Outlet, Inc., and C & D Produce Outlet - South, Inc.,
filed separate chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case Nos.
16-15760 and 16-15764) on April 21, 2016.  The petitions were
signed by Carol Saldana, the Debtors' president. The Debtors are
represented by Craig I. Kelley, Esq., at Kelley & Fulton, P.L. The
Debtors tapped Mary P. Rodgers, CPA, of Ackerman Rodgers CPA, PLLC,
as accountant. At the time of the filing, C & D Produce Outlet,
Inc. estimated assets at $0 to $50,000 and liabilities at $100,000
to $500,000; C & D Produce Outlet - South, Inc. estimated assets at
$0 to $50,000  and liabilities at $500,000 to $1 million.


CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: Presented at Bank of American Conference
--------------------------------------------------------------
Todd Stevens, president and chief executive officer of California
Resources Corporation presented at the Bank of American Merrill
Lynch 2016 Global Energy Conference held in Miami, Florida on Nov.
16 to 17, 2016.  The slides used at the presentation is available
for free at https://is.gd/e2ADC1

                   About California Resources

California Resources Corporation is an independent oil and natural
gas exploration and production company operating properties
exclusively within the State of California.  The Company was
incorporated in Delaware as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Occidental
on April 23, 2014, and remained a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Occidental until the Spin-off.  On Nov. 30, 2014, Occidental
distributed shares of the Company's common stock on a pro rata
basis to Occidental stockholders and the Company became an
independent, publicly traded company, referred to in the annual
report as the Spin-off.  Occidental retained approximately 18.5% of
the Company's outstanding shares of common stock which it has
stated it intends to divest on March 24, 2016.

The Company reported a net loss of $3.55 billion in 2015, following
a net loss of $1.43 billion in 2014.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, California Resources had $6.33 billion in
total assets, $6.82 billion in total liabilities and a total
deficit of $493 million.

                           *    *    *

In September 2016, S&P Global Ratings raised its corporate credit
rating on California Resources to 'CCC+' from 'SD'.  "We raised
the
corporate credit rating on CRC to reflect our reassessment of its
credit profile following the tender for its senior unsecured
notes," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Paul Harvey.  "The
rating reflects our expectation that debt leverage will remain at
what we consider unsustainable levels over the next 24 months
despite the net-debt reduction of about $625 million from the
tender," he added.

In August 2016, Moody's Investors Service downgraded California
Resources' Corporate Family Rating to 'Caa2' from 'Caa1' and
Probability of Default Rating to 'Caa2-PD' from 'Caa1-PD'.


CANNERY CASINO: S&P Puts $20MM Loan's 'B' Rating on Watch Positive
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it placed its 'B' issue-level rating
on Cannery Casino Resorts LLC's $20 million revolving credit
facility and 'CCC' issue-level rating on Cannery's $165 million
second-lien term loan (approximately $90 million outstanding as of
Sept. 30, 2016,) on CreditWatch with positive implications
following Cannery's repayment of debt with proceeds from the sale
of The Meadows Racetrack & Casino to Gaming & Leisure Properties
Inc.  The recovery ratings on these debt issues are '2' and '6'. At
the same time, S&P withdrew its issue-level and recovery ratings on
the company's $385 million first-lien term loan, which it repaid in
full.

The CreditWatch placement reflects the likelihood of improved
recovery prospects for lenders on these remaining debt issues
following the company's recent repayment of debt with asset sale
proceeds.  Cannery received net proceeds of approximately $435
million, which it used to fully repay its first-lien term loan
(approximately $355 million in principal amount outstanding before
transaction close) and to repay a part of the second-lien debt.
Cannery intends to sell its remaining assets to Boyd Gaming, a
transaction anticipated to occur before Dec. 31, 2016, and S&P
expects the proceeds to be sufficient to fully repay all of its
remaining outstanding debt.  S&P expects Cannery will dissolve the
company following this asset sale, and S&P plans to withdraw its
ratings, including S&P's 'B-' corporate credit rating, once the
asset sales are complete and Cannery repays all its outstanding
debt.  In the event Cannery does not sell its remaining assets to
Boyd and it continues to operate as a going concern, S&P would
reassess recovery prospects for remaining lenders by updating its
simulated default scenario and valuation assumptions to reflect the
remaining assets and cash flows available to lenders and its
expected future capital structure.

RATINGS LIST

Cannery Casino Resorts LLC
Corporate Credit                        B-/Stable/--

Ratings Affirmed; CreditWatch/Outlook Action

Cannery Casino Resorts LLC
Washington Trotting Assn Inc.
Senior Secured
  $20 mil revolver due 2017             B/Watch Pos        B
   Recovery Rating                      2H                 2H

  $165 mil 2nd lien term loan due 2019   CCC/Watch Pos      CCC
   Recovery Rating                      6                  6

Ratings Withdrawn
Senior Secured
  $385 mil 1st lien term loan due 2018  NR                 B
   Recovery Rating                      NR                 2H


CENTORBI CUSTOM: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 cases of Centorbi LLC and Centorbi
Custom Cabinetry, Inc., as of Nov. 23, according to a court
docket.

Centorbi LLC and Centorbi Custom Cabinetry, Inc. sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E. D. Mo. Lead Case
No. 16-47459) on October 14, 2016.  The petitions were signed by
Derek T. Centorbi, authorized member.  

The cases are assigned to Judge Kathy A. Surratt-States.

At the time of the filing, Centorbi LLC estimated its assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.  Centorbi Custom
estimated assets of less than $1 million.


CHEMTURA CORP: Discharge Injunction Enforced vs Benzene Claimants
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge James L. Garrity, Jr. of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York granted reorganized Chemtura
Corporation, et al.'s motion to enforce the discharge injunction
under the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, but denied sanctions
against the Benzene claimants and counsel.

Six post-confirmation lawsuits (collectively, the "Benzene
Lawsuits") were filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia
County by eight individuals and an estate representative
(collectively, the "Benzene Claimants") against Chemtura
Corporation.  The Benzene Claimants sought damages for personal
injuries that they contend arose from exposure to benzene and other
organic solvent-containing products, including mineral spirits
allegedly manufactured or sold by Chemtura's predecessor in
interest, Witco Corporation, to and used by Safety-Kleen Systems,
Inc., in the manufacture and sale of partswashing machines and
parts-washing solvents.

Before the effective date of their joint plan of reorganization,
Chemtura and its debtor-affiliates (collectively, the "Reorganized
Debtors"), filed a motion seeking the entry of an order pursuant to
sections 105(a), 524, and 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy
Rules 3020(d), 9014, and 9020, and 28 U.S.C. section 1927:

     (1) enforcing the permanent injunction prohibiting the
         pursuit of discharged claims against Chemtura (the        

         "Discharge Injunction") under the Court's November 3,
         2010 order confirming the Plan the Benzene Claimants and
         their counsel, the Locks Law Firm;

     (2) declaring the Locks Law Firm and the Benzene Claimants
         in civil contempt; and

     (3) imposing sanctions on the Locks Law Firm and Benzene
         Claimants by awarding Chemtura its reasonable attorneys'
         fees and costs incurred in connection with the Motion
         and the Benzene Lawsuits.

The Reorganized Debtors contended that the Discharge Injunction
bars the prosecution of those lawsuits because those actions are on
account of prepetition claims against the debtors that were
discharged under the Plan.  They asserted that the Benzene
Claimants and Locks Law Firm have continued to prosecute those
lawsuits willfully, despite their knowledge of the injunction and
Chemtura's repeated requests that they dismiss those actions.

The Benzene Claimants and Locks Law Firm opposed the Motion,
arguing that:

     (1) enforcing the Discharge Injunction would violate the
         Benzene Claimants' due process rights because they were
         not provided with adequate notice of the claims bar date
         in these cases; and

     (2) in any event, the Discharge Injunction does not bar the
         Benzene Claimants from proceeding with their lawsuits if
         only to establish Chemtura's insurers' liability for
         their injuries.

Thus, the Benzene Claimants denied that there are grounds to
enforce the Discharge Injunction or to hold them in contempt.  They
also contended that they should be given additional discovery with
respect to the debtors' insurance policies and, pending completion
of that discovery, the Court should defer from ruling on the
Motion.

Judge Garrity denied the Benzene Claimants' request for discovery.
Further, the judge found that, as of the petition date, the Benzene
Claimants were "unknown" creditors of the debtors holding
prepetition tort claims and were afforded due process and received
adequate notice of the bar date by publication.  As such, Judge
Garrity concluded that the claims underlying the Benzene Lawsuits
were discharged pursuant to the Plan.

Judge Garrity also found that the Discharge Injunction permanently
enjoins the Benzene Claimants from proceeding against Chemtura in
those actions, even if only nominally for the purpose of
establishing liability of Chemtura's insurers, since Chemtura would
bear defense costs under its insurance policies and/or cost sharing
agreements with its insurers.  Thus, the judge found that there are
grounds to enforce the Discharge Injunction.

Judge Garrity, however, declined to find the Benzene Claimants and
Locks Law Firm in civil contempt for prosecuting the Benzene
Lawsuits.

A full-text copy of Judge Garrity's November 23, 2016 opinion is
available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb09-11233-5910.pdf

Reorganized Debtors are represented by:

          M. Natasha Labovitz, Esq.
          Craig A. Bruens, Esq.
          DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
          919 Third Avenue
          New York, NY 10019
          Tel: (212)909-6000
          Fax: (212)909-6836
          Email: nlabovitz@debevoise.com
                 cabruens@debevoise.com

Benzene Claimants are represented by:

          Janet Walsh, Esq.
          LOCKS LAW FIRM PLLC
          800 Third Avenue, 12th floor
          New York, NY 10019
          Tel: (212)838-3333
          Email: jwalsh@lockslaw.com

            -- and --

          Andrew J. Dupont, Esq.
          LOCKS LAW FIRM PLLC
          The Curtis Center, Suite 720E
          601 Walnut Street
          Philadelphia, PA 19106
          Tel: (215)893-0100
          Email: adupont@lockslaw.com

                      About Chemtura Corp.

Based in Middlebury, Connecticut, Chemtura Corporation --
http://www.chemtura.com/-- with 2008 sales of $3.5 billion, is a  
global manufacturer and marketer of specialty chemicals, crop
protection products, and pool, spa and home care products.

Chemtura Corporation and 26 of its U.S. affiliates filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
09-11233) on March 18, 2009.  The Debtors disclosed total assets
of $3.06 billion and total debts of $1.02 billion as of the
Chapter 11 filing.

M. Natasha Labovitz, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York,
served as bankruptcy counsel for the Debtors.  Wolfblock LLP was
the Debtors' special counsel.  The Debtors' auditors and
accountant were KPMG LLP; their investment bankers are Lazard
Freres & Co.; their strategic communications advisors were Joele
Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher; their business advisors were
Alvarez & Marsal LLC and Ray Dombrowski served as their chief
restructuring officer; and their claims and noticing agent was
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC.

The Official Committee of Equity Security Holders tapped
Jay Goffman, Esq., and David Turetsky, Esq., at Skadden Arps Slate
Meagher & Flom LLP, in New York, as counsel.  the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors retained Daniel H. Golden, Esq.,
Philip C. Dublin, Esq., and Meredith A. Lahaie, Esq., at Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, in New York, as counsel.

Chemtura completed its financial restructuring and emerged from
protection under Chapter 11 in November 2010.  In connection with
the emergence, reorganized Chemtura is now listed on the New York
Stock Exchange under the ticker "CHMT".


CHINA FISHERY: Court OKs Appointment of W. Brandt as Ch. 11 Trustee
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge James L. Garrity, Jr., of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York entered an order approving the
appointment of William J. Brandt, Jr., as the Chapter 11 Trustee
for CFG Peru Investments Pte. Limited (Singapore), and affiliate of
China Fishery Group Limited (Cayman).

William K. Harrington, the United States Trustee for Region 2,
notified the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New
York of the appointment of William A. Brandt, Jr., as the Chapter
11 Trustee for CFG Peru Investments Pte. Limited (Singapore), Case
No. 16-11914 (JLG), an affiliate of China Fishery Group Limited,
(Cayman).

Mr. Brandt is required to notify the U.S. Trustee, in writing, by
signing and returning the notice by first class mail within five
business days from the receipt of his appointment.  On the Amended
Notice of Appointment of a Trustee, Mr. Brandt is further requested
to post a Chapter 11 trustee bond in the amount of $10,000.

The motion seeking appointment of a trustee was filed by
Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A., Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong)
Limited and DBS Bank (Hong Kong), Limited, seeking the appointment
of a Chapter 11 trustee pursuant to section 1104(a)(2) of the
Bankruptcy Code.  The motion was joined by Bank of America, N.A.,
Malayan Banking Berhad, Hong Kong Branch, the Insolvency
Administrator of the Pickenpack Group, and the Senior Noteholders
Committee.

The Movants sought the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee for the
Debtors under section 1104(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code for a
variety of reasons, the most pressing of which is to cause the
Peruvian Opcos to challenge those insolvency proceedings.  In
substance, they contended that the trustee should cause the
Peruvian Opcos to contest the involuntary petitions by, among
other
things, exercising their rights under Peruvian law to satisfy the
claims of the petitioning creditors.  The Movants maintained that
after those proceedings are dismissed, the trustee should cause
the
Debtors to sell the Peruvian business, pay off the creditors of
the
Peruvian Opcos, and distribute the net proceeds from the sale to
the Debtors' creditors and shareholders in accordance with their
rights and priorities.  Thus, while the Debtors are advocating a
"wait and see" approach, with the value of the Peruvian Opcos to
be
realized and distributed through the Peruvian Insolvency
Proceedings, the Movants, through their motion, sought, among
other
things, to obtain the benefit of their pre-petition bargain with
the Debtors.

                   About China Fishery Group

China Fishery Group Limited (Cayman) and its affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 16-11895) on June 30, 2016. The petition was signed by Ng
Puay Yee, chief executive officer.

The case is assigned to Judge James L. Garrity Jr.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets at $500
million to $1 billion and debts at $10 million to $50 million.

Howard B. Kleinberg, Esq., Edward J. LoBello, Esq. and Jil
Mazer-Marino, Esq. of Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. serve As
legal counsel. The Debtor has tapped Goldin Associates, LLC, as
financial advisor and RSR Consulting LLC as restructuring
consultant.


CLINICA SANTA ROSA: U.S. Trustee Ordered to Appoint PCO
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Edward A. Godoy of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Puerto Rico directs the United States Trustee to
appoint a Patient Care Ombudsman for Clinica Santa Rosa, Inc.

The Court gives the United States Trustee or the Debtor until
December 7, 2016, to inform the court, in writing, why the
appointment of an ombudsman is not necessary for the protection of
the patients.

             About Clinica Santa Rosa

Clinica Santa Rosa, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
P.R. Case No.: 16-09033) on November 14, 2016, and is represented
by Antonio I Hernandez Santiago, Esq. in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor has $1 million to $10 million
in estimated assets and $10 million to $50 million in estimated
liabilities.

The petition was signed by Fernando Alarcon Ocasio, president.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb16-09033.pdf


COLOR LANDSCAPES: Has Until Dec. 21 to Use BB&T Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Lena Mansori James of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of North Carolina authorized Color Landscapes by
Michael Dickey, Inc., to use Branch Banking & Trust Company's cash
collateral, pursuant to the Consent Order submitted by the
parties.

The Debtor owes Branch Banking approximately $482,407 pursuant to a
promissory note.  The Note is secured by the Debtor's inventory,
equipment and accounts.

The Debtor contended that its accounts and inventory represent
Branch Banking's cash collateral.

The Debtor is authorized to use cash collateral for its ordinary
and reasonable operating expenses, which includes payment of
reasonable and necessary payroll and all standard and reasonable
operating expenses.

The approved Budget provided for total expenses in the amount of
$45,508 for November 2016 and $48,608 for December 2016.

The Debtor's use of cash collateral will end on the earliest of:

     (1) the entry of a final order authorizing the use of cash
collateral;

     (2) the entry of a further interim order authorizing the use
of cash collateral;

     (3) a further hearing on the use of cash collateral scheduled
on Dec. 21, 2016, at 2:00 p.m.;

     (4) the entry of an order denying or modifying the use of cash
collateral;

     (5) an occurrence of default; or

     (6) the occurrence of a Termination Event.

Branch Banking is granted a postpetition replacement lien in the
Debtor's postpetition property of the same type which secured the
indebtedness to Branch Banking prepetition.  Branch Banking was
also granted an allowed super-priority administrative expense
claim, to the extent of any diminution in value of its interests in
prepetition collateral caused solely by the use of cash
collateral.

The Debtor is directed to make monthly adequate protection payments
to Branch Banking in the amount of $1,965.  The Debtor is further
directed to keep all of its personal property insured for no less
than the amounts of the prepetition insurance.

A further hearing on the Debtor's Motion is scheduled on Dec. 21,
2016 at 2:00 p.m.

A full-text copy of the Consent Order, dated Nov. 21, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/ColorLandscapes2016_1610435_105.pdf

Branch Banking & Trust Company can be reached at:

          BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY
          Attn: Kelly S. King, President
          200 West Second Street
          Winston-Salem, NC 27101

            About Color Landscapes by Michael Dickey

Color Landscapes by Michael Dickey, Inc., sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case No.
16-10435) on May 2, 2016.  

The Debtor is represented by Dirk W. Siegmund, Esq., at Ivey,
McClellan, Gatton & Stegmund, LLP.  The case is assigned to Judge
Lena M. James.

The Debtor disclosed total assets of $1.09 million and total debt
of $1.49 million.

William Miller, U. S. bankruptcy administrator, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North Carolina a
statement of inability to form an official committee of unsecured
creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Color Landscapes by Michael
Dickey, Inc., on May 14, 2016.


COMPREHENSIVE PHYSICIANS: Wants Approval to Use Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Physicians Services, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida for authorization to use
cash collateral.

C1 Bank contends that the Debtor is indebted to it in the
approximate amount of $300,000.  C1 Bank contends that it has a
lien on the Debtor's accounts receivable.

The Debtor is also obligated to Can Capital and National Finance,
who contend that their obligations are secured by liens on accounts
receivable.  The Debtor contends that the liens, if any exist, are
junior to the liens of C1 Bank.

The Debtor relates that it is owed money from patients, insurance
companies, and third party payees.  The Debtor anticipates that it
will generate additional accounts receivable and collect funds on
account of such receivables after the Petition Date in the ordinary
course of business.  The Debtor further relates that the collection
of such receivables may constitute cash collateral of the
creditors.

The Debtor wants to use cash collateral for the care, maintenance
and preservation of its assets, payment of necessary business
expenses, and continued business operations.

The Debtor's proposed Budget projects total expenses at $37,780.

The Debtor proposes to grant the Creditors with a replacement lien
on assets acquired after the Petition Date to the same extent,
validity, and priority as existed on the Petition Date.  The Debtor
believes that it can operate its business during the Chapter 11
case and successfully reorganize its business if it is allowed to
use cash collateral.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Nov. 11, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/ComprehensivePhysicians2016_816bk09905cpm_9.pdf

C1 Bank can be reached at:

          C1 BANK
          ATTN: Ryan L. Snyder, Esq., Registered Agent
          2025 Lakewood Ranch Boulevard, Suite 102
          Brandenton, FL 34211

Can Capital can be reached at:

          CAN CAPITAL
          c/o C T Corporation System, Registered Agent
          1200 South Pine Island Road
          Plantation, FL 33324

Comprehensive Physicians Services, Inc., can be reached at:

          Scott A. Stichter, Esq.
          STICHTER, RIEDEL, BLAIN & POSTLER, P.A.
          110 E. Madison Street, Suite 200
          Tampa, FL 33602
          Telephone: (813) 229-0144
          E-mail: sstichter@srbp.com

           About Comprehensive Physicians Services

Comprehensive Physicians Services, Inc., filed a chapter 11
petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-9905) on Nov. 18, 2016.  The
Debtor is represented by Scott A. Stitchter, Esq., at Stichter,
Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A.


COMSTOCK RESOURCES: PointState Funds Have 9.99% Stake as of Nov. 8
------------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, SteelMill Master Fund, LP, PointState Fund LP,
PointState Holdings LLC, PointState Capital LP, PointState Capital
GP LLC, BlockHouse Master Fund LP, PointState BlockHouse LLC,
BlockHouse Holdings LLC and Zachary J. Schreiber disclosed that as
of Nov. 8, 2016, they beneficially own 1,493,401 shares of common
stock, par value $0.50 per share, of Comstock Resources, Inc.,
which represents 9.99 percent of the shares outstanding.  A
full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/X2GLJN

                   About Comstock Resources

Comstock Resources, Inc. is an independent energy company based in
Frisco, Texas and is engaged in oil and gas acquisitions,
exploration and development primarily in Texas and Louisiana.  The
Company's stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol CRK.

The Company reported a net loss of $1.04 billion for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $57.11 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

                        *    *     *

As reported by the TCR on Sept. 23, 2016, S&P Global Ratings raised
its corporate credit rating on Comstock Resources Inc. to 'CCC+'
from 'SD' (selective default).  The outlook is negative.
"The rating actions on Comstock are in conjunction with the
Sept. 6, 2016, close of their comprehensive debt exchange and our
assessment of the company's revised capital structure and credit
profile," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Aaron McLean.

Comstock Resources carries a Caa2 corporate family rating
from Moody's Investors Service.


CONDUENT INC: Fitch Assigns Final 'BB' IDR; Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has converted the expected 'BB' Long-term Issuer
Default Rating to a final first-time rating for Conduent
Incorporated.  Fitch has also assigned first-time ratings to its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Xerox Business Services LLC XBS:

Conduent
   -- Long-Term (LT) Issuer Default Rating (IDR) 'BB'.

XBS
   -- LT IDR 'BB';
   -- Senior secured term loans 'BB+/RR1';
   -- Senior secured revolving credit facility 'BB+/RR1';
   -- Senior unsecured debt 'BB/RR4'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.  Fitch's actions affect $3 billion of
total debt, including an undrawn $750 million senior secured
revolving credit facility.

In connection with the separation from Xerox Corporation, Conduent
will raise approximately $2.2 billion of new borrowings under XBS
and transfer approximately $1.9 billion of net proceeds to Xerox,
with remaining net proceeds being added to the balance sheet.  The
new borrowings will include a mix of senior secured term loans and
senior unsecured notes.

The senior secured credit facilities will be secured by
substantially all assets of Xerox Business Serivces' assets and
fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Conduent and certain
domestic operating subsidiaries of XBS.  The senior secured credit
facilities will have customary negative covenants and a maximum net
leverage test of 4.25x with a step-down to 3.75x on Dec. 31, 2018.

Xerox will separate Conduent, which will be comprised of the
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) businesses within Xerox's
Services segment (excluding the Document Outsourcing business that
will remain at Xerox) through a spin-off transaction intended to be
tax-free for Xerox shareholders for federal income tax purposes.
The separation is expected to be completed at the end of calendar
2016.

                         KEY RATING DRIVERS

Stabilizing Top Line: Fitch expects stabilizing operating
performance in the near term with modest transitory headwinds
pressuring revenue growth and profit margin expansion on track.
Conduent's focus on turning around unprofitable contracts,
customary price declines and lower volumes, particularly in
commercial industries should constrain near-term revenue growth.
However, Fitch expects the top line will stabilize in 2018 and
should grow in-line (low single digits) with the market through the
intermediate term.

Size and Diversification: Conduent is a global leader in BPO by
revenue and number of employees with geographically mixed delivery
platforms.  Fitch believes Conduent is a market leader in certain
industries and, given its scale, should consolidate share over time
from smaller players without financial flexibility to support
higher investment levels or capabilities to drive innovation. Fitch
also believes Conduent's domain expertise across end markets should
reduce operating volatility.  Conduent has strong positions and is
a market leader in transaction processing, customer care and human
resource services, serving public sector, large enterprise and
healthcare.

Recurring Revenue Streams: Fitch expects Conduent to continue
benefitting from 90% recurring revenue from contracts with an
average life of more than three years.  Conduent's 86% contract
renewal rates result in greater visibility, although contractual
price step-downs for certain contracts require Conduent to reduce
delivery costs through productivity gains, including automation and
right shoring, to maintain consistent profitability.

Restructuring Led Profitability Growth: Fitch expects Conduent's
strategic transformation initiatives, announced in connection with
the separation transaction in January 2016, will result in stronger
operating performance over the longer-term and begin driving profit
margin expansion beginning in 2017.  Fitch believes Conduent plans
on achieving significant cost savings with a portion reinvested and
remainder dropping to the bottom line.  A portion of savings also
should support standalone costs (dis-synergies).

Reasonably Conservative Financial Policies: Fitch expects financial
policies will remain reasonably conservative for the rating through
the intermediate term.  Fitch estimates total leverage (total debt
to operating EBITDA) at separation will be approximately 3.5x,
which assumes $2.2 billion of new debt and Fitch's estimate of
roughly $625 million of pro forma operating EBITDA.  Credit metrics
should strengthen through the intermediate term from a combination
of voluntary debt reduction and restructuring driven profitability
growth and Fitch expects Conduent to maintain total leverage below
3.0x over the longer-term.  Fitch believes Conduent will prioritize
organic investments and acquisitions rather than shareholder
returns, given the company's focus on organic growth.

Modest FCF: Fitch expects annual FCF will remain modest, given
investment intensity required to support growth.  Fitch anticipates
profit margin expansion will drive higher FCF over time, eventually
exceeding Conduent's roughly $300 million of FCF in 2015.  Fitch
expects the company will use modest FCF to support organic
investments and acquisitions, which could potentially be debt
financed given a significant majority of Conduent's cash is located
inside the U.S. and acquisitions may include offshore deals.

                         KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:

   -- Low-single digit negative constant currency organic revenue
      growth in 2016 and 2017, driven by Conduent's decision to
      exit unprofitable contracts, particularly Health Enterprise
      platforms for Montana and California, lower volume in
      commercial industries and customary price declines;
   -- Low single digit constant currency organic revenue growth
      through the intermediate term from leveraging platforms
      across industries and tuck-in acquisitions;
   -- Increased investments to support next-generation software
      and automation technologies;
   -- Expectations for operating EBITDA margin expansion to
      double-digits and then low-teens through the forecast period

      from the realization of cost savings from strategic
      transformation initiatives and resumption of positive
      organic revenue growth; and
   -- FCF will be used for acquisitions or build available cash,
      with no shareholder returns through 2017.

                       RATING SENSITIVITIES

Positive rating actions could occur if Fitch expects:

   -- Sustained positive single-digit constant currency organic
      revenue growth; and
   -- Strengthening annual FCF ranging from $250 million to $500
      million beyond the near term, driven by resumption of
      positive revenue growth and sustainable profit margin
      expansion; and
   -- Total leverage below 3x from debt reduction and
      profitability growth.

Negative rating actions could occur if Fitch expects:

   -- Negative constant currency organic revenue growth beyond
      2017, likely signalling an inability to penetrate growth
      markets and lower renewals for existing contracts;
   -- Pressured profitability that offset a meaningful portion of
      restructuring benefits resulting in operating EBITDA margins

      remaining in high single digits and pressured FCF ranging
      from break-even to $250 million; or
   -- Debt financed shareholder returns or acquisitions,
      indicating a shift in priority use of FCF and resulting in
      total leverage sustained above 3.5x.

                           LIQUIDITY

Fitch believes Conduent's liquidity profile will be adequate and
supported by:

   -- $400 million of on balance sheet cash at separation; and
   -- An undrawn $750 million senior secured revolving credit
      facility.

Fitch's expectation for $250 million to $500 million of annual FCF
also supports liquidity.  Fitch expects $2.25 billion of total debt
at separation consisting of a mix of $2.2 billion of senior
unsecured notes and senior secured term loans and $50 million of
existing debt.  Fitch gives 100% equity credit to the company's
$140 million of Series A preferred shares, which are convertible at
any time by the holders into Conduent's common stock and pay a 8%
quarterly cash dividend.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has assigned these first-time ratings:

Conduent Incorporated
   -- LT IDR 'BB'.

Xerox Business Services LLC

   -- IDR 'BB';
   -- Euro equivalent of $300 million of initial senior secured
      five-year Term Loan A 'BB+/RR1';
   -- $700 million less the amount of the initial Term Loan A of
      senior secured Delayed Draw five-year Term Loan A 'BB+/RR1';
   -- $750 million of senior secured seven-year Term Loan B
      'BB+/RR1';
   -- $750 million of senior secured five-year revolving credit
      facilities 'BB+/RR1';
   -- $750 million of senior unsecured notes 'BB/RR4'.

Fitch has withdrawn these expected ratings:

   -- Senior unsecured debt 'BB/RR4';
   -- Senior secured term loans 'BB+/RR1';
   -- Senior secured revolving credit facility 'BB+/RR1'.


CONSOLIDATED ENERGY: ATC Buying Alexandria Property for $2.3M
-------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated Energy Holdings, LLC, and Port Asset Acquisition, LLC,
ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana
to authorize the bidding and auction procedures in connection with
the sale of immovable property located at their port facility in
Alexandria, Louisiana, to Alexandria Terminal Co., LLC ("ATC") for
$2,250,0000, subject to overbid.

The Debtors have previously sold a portion of the estate's
immovable property and related property located at Vanguard's
Pollock, Louisiana biodiesel refinery to UAB Investimus Foris, a
Lithuanian limited liability company via the Court's Order dated
Nov. 23, 2015.  The Debtors also sold, via auction, related movable
property via the Court's Order dated July 17, 2016.

The Debtors now seek to sell the estate's remaining property
consisting of immovable property located at the Port of Alexandria
in Rapides Parish ("Port Property").  The Debtors  were contacted
by ATC expressing an interest in the Port Property.  ATC offered to
purchase for $2,250,0000.  After considering various options, the
Debtors accepted ATC's offer, and the parties agreed to transfer
the Port Property.

The Debtors have determined to ATC according to the terms of that
Purchase and Sale Agreement ("ATC Sale Agreement").  The important
terms and conditions of the ATC Sale Agreement are: (i) purchase
price of $2,250,000; (ii) deposit of 10%; (iii) no break-up fee;
and (iv) no contingencies other than title related contingencies.

The Debtors' counsel is aware of these liens and encumbrances
affecting the Port Property, which are listed in order of date of
recordation:

   a. Notice of Lis Pendens, in the principal amount of $3,722,
filed by SPI Municipal Supply, Inc., filed 7/22/1985, MBk. 1025,
Page 577.

   b. Multiple indebtedness mortgage in the principal amount of
$9,000,000, in favor of Union Bank, filed 10/1/2010, Reg. No.
1435065, MBk. 2558, Page 79.

   c. Multiple indebtedness mortgage in the principal amount of
$1,000,000, in favor of BOKF, NA d/b/a Bank of Oklahoma, as
indenture trustee ("BOKF"), filed 1/3/2012, Reg. 1465925, MBk.
2639, Page 541.

   d. Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement between Union Bank
and BOKF, filed 2/1/2012, Reg. 1467998, MBk. 2644, Page 929.

   e. Notice of Seizure in favor of the Union Bank, filed 2/3/2015,
Reg. 1544995, MBk. 2849, Page 730.

   f. Request for Notice of Seizure in favor of The Union Bank,
filed 10/1/15, Reg. 1435066, MBk. 2558, Page 109.

   g. Tax Sale, Conveyance Book 2009, Page 283, #1552286, PAAL to
Bakies Properties LLC, recorded 5/28/14, 2014 taxes.

   h. Tax Sale, Conveyance Book 2036, Page 361, 31576009, Bakies
Properties, LLC to Jerry Johnson, recorded 5/18/16 for 2015 taxes.

   i. Tax Sale, Conveyance Book 2036, Page 901, 31576479, Bakies
Properties, LLC to Bakies Properties LLC, recorded 5/23/16 for 2015
taxes.

As part of the proposed sale free and clear of liens, claims,
interests, and encumbrances, Debtors are generally required to
provide adequate protection to the holder of any interest in the
property.  All liens and security interests in and to the property
will attach to the proceeds with the same validity, extent, and
priority that otherwise exists.

The Debtors' proposed Bid Procedures are reasonably calculated to
encourage a buyer to submit a final bid within the range of
reasonably anticipated values.  ATC will be a stalking horse for
purposes of setting a floor and drawing competitive bids, perhaps
leading to further competition and the establishment of a baseline
against which higher or otherwise better offers can be measured.
The Debtors accordingly request entry of an order approving the Bid
Procedures.

The principal terms of the Bid Procedures are:

   a. Qualified Bid: In excess of $2,250,000.

   b. Deposit: 10% of the proposed offer.

   c. Bid Deadline: Jan. 27, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. (CPT)

   d. Auction: Feb. l, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. (CT)

   e. Overbids: $25,000

   f. Closing Deadline: The Sale Order and relevant PSA will
provide a deadline for the closing of the Sale of property within
10 business days.

The Bid Procedures require potential Purchasers to utilize the Form
Port Property Purchase Agreement.  The Form Port Property Purchase
Agreement is identical to the ATC Purchase Agreement, and contains
terms and conditions customary for the sale of immovable property
in such circumstances.  The Debtors request approval of the Form
Port Property Purchase Agreement.

A copy of the ATC Sale Agreement and Bid Procedures attached to the
Motion is available for free at:

         
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Consolidated_Energy_421_Sales.pdf

To satisfy the liens and claims described, the Debtors request
approval on distributing the proceeds of the sale as follows:

    a. First, payment of all necessary costs of the sale paid by
sellers at closing, including cancellation charges, recordation
charges, real estate taxes and other closing costs attributable to
the estate, along with payment for tax sale redemptions.

    b. Second, to Union Bank in the amount of its outstanding
allowed claim.

    c. Third, the remainder to be held in escrow pending further
order of the Court.

As time is of the essence to the proposed sale, the Debtors ask the
Court to waive the 14-day automatic stay of any final order
granting the Motion and order that the final relief requested in
the motion may be immediately available upon the entry of an order
approving the proposed sale.  The Debtors propose that a hearing on
the second order be held on Feb. 1, 2017.

The Purchaser can be reached at:

           ALEXANDRIA TERMINAL CO., LLC
           2101 Cedar Springs Rd., Suite 600
           Dallas, TX 75201
           Attn: Ronald D. Hurst
           E-mail: rhurst@petrohunt.com

              About Consolidated Energy

Consolidated Energy Holdings, LLC, and its affiliates
commenced voluntary Chapter 11 cases (Bankr. W.D. La. Lead Case
No. 15-80199) on Feb. 23, 2015.  William S. Robbins, Esq., at
Stewart, Robbins & Brown, LLC, serves as counsel to the Debtors.


CONTECH HOLDINGS: S&P Withdraws 'B' CCR on Acquisition by Quikrete
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it withdrew all of its ratings on Contech
Holdings Inc.  All rated debt has been redeemed in connection with
its acquisition by Quikrete Holdings Inc., which closed on
Nov. 15, 2016.  S&P has withdrawn its 'B' corporate credit rating
on Contech because it is no longer an independent entity following
the acquisition.



COSI INC: Cash Collateral Hearing Continued to December 7
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Melvin S. Hoffman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts, authorized Cosi, Inc. to use cash
collateral, until December 7, 2016, under the same terms and
conditions as previously ordered.  

The hearing on the Debtor's use of cash collateral was continued to
December 7, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated November 22, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/mTpsca
                     

                             About Cosi, Inc.

Cosi -- http://www.getcosi.com/-- is an international fast casual
restaurant company.  There are currently 45 Company-owned and 31
franchise restaurants operating in fourteen states, the District of
Columbia, Costa Rica and the United Arab Emirates.

Cosi, Inc. and its affiliated Debtors filed chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. D. Mass. Lead Case No. 16-13704-MSH) on Sept. 28, 2016.
The Debtors are represented by Joseph H. Baldiga, Esq. and Paul W.
Carey, Esq., at Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP.  The
O'Connor Group serves as their financial consultant.

Randy Kominsky of Alliance for Financial Growth, Inc. has been
tapped as chief restructuring officer to the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors composed of: Robert J. Dourney, Honor S. Heath of Nstar
Electric Company, and Paul Filtzer of SRI EIGHT 399 Boylston.  The
Creditors Committee is represented by Lee Harrington, Esq., at
Nixon Peabody LLP.  Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP serves
as financial advisor for the Committee.


DAILY HAVEN: Wants Authorization to Use Rialto Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------------
Daily Haven, Inc., submitted to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Georgia, its Amended Motion, asking for
authorization to use cash collateral currently held by RREF II
PB-GA LLC, also known as Rialto.

The Debtor is indebted to Rialto in the total amount of $521,360.
Rialto holds a first security interest in the Debtor's real estate,
located in Conyers, Georgia, and its improvements.

The Debtor tells the Court that it needs to use the cash collateral
on an ongoing basis to preserve the value of its Property for the
benefit of all creditors and other parties in interest.  The Debtor
further tells the Court that it intends to use the cash collateral
in the ordinary course, or for purposes of carrying on the ordinary
use and preservation of the Property.

The Debtor's proposed Budget, spanning the months of December 2016
to May 2017, provides for total expenses in the amount of $36,654
for December 2016, $29,348 for January 2017, $29,148 for February
2017, $29,993 for March 2017, $28,888 for April 2017, and $30,038
for May 2017.

The Debtor proposes to make monthly payments to Rialto in the
amount of $4,750 from August 2016 to February 2017, with $9,500
paid instanter.

A full-text copy of the Debtors' Amended Motion, dated Nov. 11,
2016, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/DailyHaven2016_1663419wlh_44.pdf

                    About Daily Haven

Daily Haven, Inc., operates a Home Health Care and Day Center for
individuals with special needs in the Conyers area.

Daily Haven, Inc. filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case
No. 16-63419) on Aug. 1, 2016.  The petition was signed by Suzann
Maughon, owner and chief officer.  The Debtor is represented by
James B. Cronon, Esq., at the Law Office of James B. Cronon, LLC.
The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $500,000 to $1
million at the time of the filing.



DALLAS, TX: Pension Fund for Police, Firefighters in Near Collapse
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mary Williams Walsh, writing for The New York Times' DealBook,
reported that Michael S. Rawlings, mayor of Dallas, Texas, has
testified to a state oversight board that his city appeared to be
"walking into the fan blades" of municipal bankruptcy.

According to the DealBook, while Dallas has the fastest economic
growth of the nation's 13 largest cities, the city's pension fund
for its police officers and firefighters is near collapse and
seeking an immense bailout.

The report related that over six recent weeks, panicked Dallas
retirees have pulled $220 million out of the fund.  What set off
the run was a recommendation in July that the retirees no longer be
allowed to take out big blocks of money, the report further
related.  Even before that, though, there were reports that the
fund's investments -- some placed in highly risky and speculative
ventures -- were worth less than previously stated, the report
added.

The DealBook said the Dallas Police and Fire Pension System has
asked the city for a one-time infusion of $1.1 billion, an amount
roughly equal to Dallas's entire general fund budget but not even
close to what the pension fund needs to be fully funded.  Nothing
would be left for fighting endemic poverty south of the Trinity
River, for public libraries, or for giving current police officers
and firefighters a raise, the report pointed out.

"It's a ridiculous request," Mr. Rawlings, a Democrat, said in
testimony this month to the Texas Pension Review Board, whose seven
members are appointed by Texas governors, all Republicans for the
last 20 years, the report related.

The mayor -- who defeated a former Dallas police chief to win his
office in 2011 -- added that he had nothing but respect for the
city's uniformed safety workers, five of whom were gunned down by a
deranged sniper during a protest against police shootings in July,
the report further related.


DAYTON POWER: S&P Affirms BB ICR on Amended Regulatory Rider Filing
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its ratings on Dayton Power & Light Co.
(DP&L), including the 'BB' issuer credit rating, and the
'BBB-' rating on the company's senior secured debt.  At the same
time, S&P also affirmed the ratings on parent DPL Inc. (DPL),
including the 'BB' issuer credit ratings, and the 'BB' rating on
the company's senior unsecured debt.  The outlook is negative.

The ratings affirmation reflects the increased possibility that the
utility can achieve a constructive regulatory outcome in Ohio based
on similar regulatory rulings for peers.  In addition, S&P's
base-case expectation incorporates its view that DP&L's generation
asset transfer to AES Ohio Generation LLC will result in an
improved business risk assessment for DP&L, but that will be offset
by weaker credit metrics for the company on a stand-alone basis.

The negative outlook reflects uncertainty about the durability and
sustainability of future ESPs or equivalent regulatory mechanisms
that could result in weaker financial measures for both DPL and
DP&L.  Given the company's size relative to peers and S&P's view of
a somewhat challenging regulatory environment in Ohio that if not
well-managed could raise regulatory risk, S&P could dampen its view
of the company's business risk assessment.

S&P could lower the ratings on DPL and DP&L over the next nine
months if the company experiences adverse regulatory outcomes that
weakened its financial ratios, including FFO to debt that is
consistently at or below 9%.  S&P could also lower the rating if it
revised its business risk assessment on DPL Inc. downward,
resulting in a lower stand-alone credit profile, or if S&P
downgrade AES Corp. by more than two notches.

S&P could revise the outlook to stable over the next nine months if
the company is able to demonstrate a sustained improvement in its
financial ratios, including FFO to debt that is consistently
greater than 11%, reflecting the middle of the range for the
aggressive financial risk profile category.  This could occur if
the company improved its management of regulatory risk, including
confirmation on the durability and sustainability of future ESP
plans, including the DMR or equivalent mechanisms that collectively
enhance S&P's view of the company's credit quality.



DETROIT DOWNTOWN: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' Rating on 2 Bond Tranches
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the 'BB+' rating on these Detroit
Downtown Development Authority bonds:

   -- $33.8 million tax increment refunding bonds (Development
      Area No. 1 projects), series 1998A;
   -- $16.1 million tax increment bonds (Development Area No. 1
      projects), series 1998B (taxable).

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

                             SECURITY

Bonds are backed by a pledge of tax increment revenues captured by
Development Area No. 1 net of those captured for school district
purposes (school capture).  The debt service reserve (DSR) is
funded with a surety policy.

                        KEY RATING DRIVERS

The 'BB+' rating reflects historically declining trends in pledged
tax increment revenue which show emerging signs of reversing, high
taxpayer concentration, a cautious outlook on Detroit's economy and
the closed lien on pledged revenues.

Caution on Pledged Revenue Growth: Historical revenue trends have
been very weak, but ongoing investments in and around Development
Area 1 have led to recent improvement.  Fitch believes strong
near-term pledged revenue growth is likely.  However, this
expectation is balanced against concerns about the longer-term
sustainability of existing and additional development in the area.
Fitch thus expects long-term revenue growth will be slow.

Limited Resilience: Debt service coverage has improved to 1.6x with
fiscal 2016 pledged revenue growth of 26% and the recent defeasance
of $3 million in outstanding debt.  Despite the very recent
improvement, Fitch believes a high level of taxpayer concentration,
sizable historical pledged revenue declines and notable revenue
volatility contribute to the debt structure's limited resilience
through economic cycles.

                       RATING SENSITIVITIES

Change in pledged revenue expectations: The rating is sensitive to
performance of pledged tax increment revenue outside of Fitch's
expectations.  A consistent trend of solid improvement could result
in an upgrade; conversely, a return to pronounced, multi-year
declines could lead to a downgrade.

                         CREDIT PROFILE

The DDA was formed in 1976 to promote economic development in
downtown Detroit.  Development Area No. 1 is roughly coterminous
with the downtown business district and represents about 9% of the
city's taxable value.  In addition to the GM-owned Renaissance
Center, the district includes one of the city's three casinos,
stadiums for the Detroit Lions and Detroit Tigers, and development
along the city's waterfront.

A multipurpose events center that will be home to the Detroit Red
Wings, owned by the DDA and thus tax-exempt, is under construction
within the project area.  Development near the events center site
is ongoing and contributes to expectations for solid pledged
revenue growth in at least the near term.  Additional private
residential and commercial development includes investment by
Quicken Loans and a trolley connection to Wayne State University.

Captured (incremental) value is a moderate 166% of the base,
exposing pledged revenue to a large degree of volatility for a
given decline in taxable value (TV) absent a change in tax rates.
Taxpayer concentration is quite high, with the top 10 payers making
up 51% of TV and 83% of captured value.  General Motors Corp. (GM)
is the largest taxpayer at almost 20% of TV.

The series 1998 bonds have a senior lien on general tax increment
revenues, and are not secured by 'catalyst' revenues that are
pledged to bonds issued in 2014 by the Michigan Strategic Fund for
the construction of the multipurpose events center.  With the 2014
issuance, the senior lien has been closed.

To evaluate the sensitivity of the dedicated revenue stream to
cyclical decline, Fitch considers both revenue sensitivity results
(using a 1% decline in national GDP scenario) and the largest
decline in revenues over the period covered by the revenue
sensitivity analysis.

Based on tax increment revenue history, Fitch's analytical
sensitivity tool (FAST) generates a high 6.9% scenario decline in
pledged revenues.  Tax increment revenues have been on a generally
declining trend for more than a decade; the largest cumulative
decline was a 31% drop from fiscal 2009-2013.  The declines reflect
general economic weakening in the city of Detroit, including
automaker bankruptcies, compounded by the recession. Since then,
prospects for the automakers have improved -- GM's IDR is
'BBB-'/Outlook Positive; Ford's is 'BBB'/Outlook Stable.

Pledged revenues could withstand a 36% decline before they were
insufficient to fully cover debt service.  This is 1.2x the largest
actual cumulative decline, or 5.2x the recessionary impact
estimated in Fitch's FAST scenario.  Fitch believes that this level
of resilience is consistent with a 'BB' category rating.

The city's economic indicators continue to be exceptionally weak
despite some recent improvement.  The unemployment rate is still
high but about half of its recessionary peak.  Employment gains are
emerging but are below the rate of national growth and the poverty
rate is quite high.  Population losses have slowed.


DIFFUSION PHARMACEUTICALS: Incurs $5.43 Million Net Loss in Q3
--------------------------------------------------------------
Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc. filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $5.43 million for the three months ended Sept. 30,
2016, compared to a net loss of $1.42 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2015.

For the three months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss of $15.46 million compared to a net loss of $3.99 million
for the year ended Sept. 30, 2015.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Diffusion had $19.04 million in total assets,
$7.56 million in total liabilities and $11.48 million in total
stockholders' equity.

David Kalergis, chairman and chief executive officer, stated, "I am
very excited about the progress that we have made in advancing the
clinical development of our lead candidate, trans sodium
crocetinate (TSC).  The completion of the reverse stock split and
subsequent uplisting to the Nasdaq Capital Market is an important
step for the Company and I am extremely pleased that we have
reached this stage of growth.  The successful completion of our
three month animal toxicology studies is also an important
milestone in support of Diffusion's readiness to conduct a Phase 3
pivotal trial of TSC in newly diagnosed GBM patients.  Our newly
assembled Scientific Advisory Board will serve as a valuable
resource as we prepare to begin this Phase 3 trial, and will also
guide our research as we seek to develop TSC for therapeutic use in
other hypoxia-related diseases."

                       Corporate Highlights

In August 2016, Diffusion announced a 1-for-10 reverse stock split
in preparation for its proposed uplisting to Nasdaq Capital
Market.

In September 2016, Diffusion announced the successful completion of
animal toxicity studies in preparation for a Phase 3 pivotal trial
of TSC in newly diagnosed GBM patients.

In September 2016, the Company also established a Scientific
Advisory Board of distinguished experts to serve as a resource for
the development of TSC in its many areas on therapeutic use for
indications involving hypoxic conditions.

In November 2016, the Company subsequently announced that its
shares of common stock were approved for listing on the Nasdaq
Capital Market, effective Nov. 9, 2016.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/NqWTob

                About Diffusion Pharmaceuticals

Diffusion Pharmaceuticals, as surviving entity in its merger with
RestorGenex, is a clinical stage biotechnology company focused on
extending the life expectancy of cancer patients by improving the
effectiveness of current standard-of-care treatments including
radiation therapy and chemotherapy.  Diffusion is developing its
lead drug, trans sodium crocetinate (TSC), for use in the many
cancer types in which tumor hypoxia (oxygen deprivation) is known
to diminish the effectiveness of current treatments.  TSC targets
the cancer's hypoxic micro-environment, re-oxygenating
treatment-resistant tissue and making the cancer cells more
vulnerable to the therapeutic effects of treatments such as
radiation therapy and chemotherapy, without the apparent addition
of any serious side effects.  TSC has potential application in
other indications involving hypoxia, such as stroke and
neurodegenerative diseases.

Diffusion reported a net loss of $23.8 million on $0 of revenues
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $14.4
million on $0 of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, in Chicago, Illinois, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company's recurring
losses from operations and its present financial resources raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


DOMINICA LLC: Court Allows Cash Collateral Use Through Jan. 4
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts authorized Dominica LLC to use of cash collateral
through January 4, 2017.

Judge Feeney ordered that the Debtor's use of the cash collateral
will be on the same terms and conditions as the Court's previous
Cash Collateral Order.

Judge Feeney directed the Debtor to file a plan and disclosure
statement, as well as a reconciliation of actual to budget by
January 3, 2017.

A continued hearing on the Debtor's continued use of cash
collateral will be held on January 4, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.  The
deadline for the filing of objections to the Debtor's continued use
of cash collateral is set on January 3, 2017.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated November 22, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/F68bnD

                           About Dominica LLC

Dominica LLC filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No.
16-13461) on Sept. 8, 2016.  The petition was signed by Evangeline
Martin, manager.  The Debtor is represented by Michael Van Dam,
Esq., at Van Dam Law LLP.  The Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities at $500,001 to $1 million at the time of the filing.


ELBIT IMAGING: Unit's Neuro System Okayed by CMS for U.S. Coverage
------------------------------------------------------------------
Elbit Imaging Ltd. announced it was informed by INSIGHTEC Ltd.,
that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services assigned a
status to the Exablate Neuro treatment for Essential Tremor, moving
it from a non-payable status indicator to one that allows
reimbursement.

The CMS decision is one of several steps toward gaining appropriate
reimbursement for MRgFUS for essential tremor.  This needs to be
followed by CMS regional offices approval to the reimbursement for
the Exablate Neuro treatment, for their patients.

According to the CMS's recommendation, the Exablate Neuro was
assigned a reimbursement code with a payment level of $9,751.

The CMS is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, and it oversees, among its other functions, Medicare (the
federal health insurance program for the elderly, [which are the
main group of potential patients for the Exablate Neuro
treatment]), and Medicare reimbursement rates for healthcare
providers that use federally certified health IT systems.

At this stage, INSIGHTEC is unable to estimate the implications of
the CMS's recommendation on INSIGHTEC.

INSIGHTEC's Exablate Neuro platform is transforming medicine by
presenting a non-invasive treatment alternative that combines two
technologies: Focused Ultrasound, which is used to lesion the
targeted tissue deep in the brain, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
(MRI), which is used to guide the ultrasound waves to the specific
target tissue and provide real-time feedback on treatment progress
and outcomes.

Essential tremor is the most common movement disorder, affecting
millions people worldwide.  It is a progressive and debilitating
neurological condition that causes a rhythmic trembling of the
hands, head, voice, legs or trunk.

The Company holds approximately 89.9% of the share capital of Elbit
Medical Technologies Ltd. (TASE: EMTC-M) (85.6% on a fully diluted
basis) which, in turn, holds approximately 31.3% of the share
capital in INSIGHTEC (26.6% on a fully diluted basis).

                       About Elbit Imaging

Tel-Aviv, Israel-based Elbit Imaging Ltd. (TASE, NASDAQ: EMITF)
holds investments in real estate and medical companies.  The
Company, through its subsidiaries, also develops shopping and
entertainment centers in Central Europe and invests in and manages
hotels.

Elbit Imaging reported a loss of NIS 186.15 million on NIS 1.47
million of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to
profit of NIS 1 billion on NIS 461,000 of revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014.  As of Dec. 31, 2015, Elbit Imaging had NIS
778.25 million in total assets, NIS 758.96 million in total
liabilities and NIS 19.28 million in shareholders' equity.

Since February 2013, Elbit has intensively endeavored to come to
an arrangement with its creditors.  Elbit has said it has been
hanging by a thread for more than five months.  It has encountered
cash flow difficulties and this burdens its day to day activities,
and it certainly cannot make the necessary investments to improve
its assets.  In light of the arrangement proceedings, and
according to the demands of most of the bondholders, as well as an
agreement that was signed on March 19, 2013, between Elbit and the
Trustees of six out of eight series of bonds, Elbit is prohibited,
inter alia, from paying off its debts to the financial creditors
-- and as a result a petition to liquidate Elbit was filed, and
Bank Hapoalim has declared its debts immediately payable,
threatening to realize pledges that were given to the Bank on
material assets of the Company -- and Elbit undertook not to sell
material assets of the Company and not to perform any transaction
that is not during its ordinary course of business without giving
an advance notice to the trustees.

Accountant Rony Elroy has been appointed as expert for examining
the debt arrangement in the Company.

In July 2013, Elbit Imaging's controlling shareholders, Europe-
Israel MMS Ltd. and Mr. Mordechay Zisser, notified the Company
that the Tel Aviv District Court has appointed Adv. Giroa Erdinast
as a receiver with regards to the ordinary shares of the Company
held by Europe Israel securing Europe Israel's obligations under
its loan agreement with Bank Hapoalim B.M.  The judgment stated
that the Receiver is not authorized to sell the Company's shares
at this stage.  Following a request of Europe-Israel, the Court
also delayed any action to be taken with regards to the sale of
those shares for a period of 60 days.  Europe Israel and
Mr. Zisser have also notified the Company that they utterly reject
the Bank's claims and intend to appeal the Court's ruling.


ELBIT IMAGING: Updates Agreement to Sell Project in Bangalore
-------------------------------------------------------------
Elbit Imaging Ltd. announced an update regarding an agreement to
sell 100% of its interest in a special purpose vehicle which holds
a site in Bangalore, India, by Elbit Plaza India Real Estate
Holdings Limited (in which EI holds a 50% stake with its joint
venture partner, Plaza Centers N.V.) to a local investor (the
"Purchaser").

The Purchaser paid an advance payment of INR 5 Crores
(approximately EUR 0.65 million) on 30 September 2016, but has
informed EPI that it will not be able to execute the advance
payments due, in the fourth quarter of 2016, under the Sale
Agreement.  The Sale Agreement determines that if the Purchaser
fails to execute any of the advance payments, EPI will be able to
enforce its rights under the Sale Agreement, including the
execution of the Securities.  Therefore, EPI is now considering its
options with respect to the Sale Agreement, including, inter alia,
the execution of the securities provided by the Purchaser to EPI
under the Sale Agreement.

The Company will update regarding any new developments.

                      About Elbit Imaging

Tel-Aviv, Israel-based Elbit Imaging Ltd. (TASE, NASDAQ: EMITF)
holds investments in real estate and medical companies.  The
Company, through its subsidiaries, also develops shopping and
entertainment centers in Central Europe and invests in and manages
hotels.

Elbit Imaging reported a loss of NIS 186.15 million on NIS 1.47
million of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to
profit of NIS 1 billion on NIS 461,000 of revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014.  As of Dec. 31, 2015, Elbit Imaging had NIS
778.25 million in total assets, NIS 758.96 million in total
liabilities and NIS 19.28 million in shareholders' equity.

Since February 2013, Elbit has intensively endeavored to come to
an arrangement with its creditors.  Elbit has said it has been
hanging by a thread for more than five months.  It has encountered
cash flow difficulties and this burdens its day to day activities,
and it certainly cannot make the necessary investments to improve
its assets.  In light of the arrangement proceedings, and
according to the demands of most of the bondholders, as well as an
agreement that was signed on March 19, 2013, between Elbit and the
Trustees of six out of eight series of bonds, Elbit is prohibited,
inter alia, from paying off its debts to the financial creditors
-- and as a result a petition to liquidate Elbit was filed, and
Bank Hapoalim has declared its debts immediately payable,
threatening to realize pledges that were given to the Bank on
material assets of the Company -- and Elbit undertook not to sell
material assets of the Company and not to perform any transaction
that is not during its ordinary course of business without giving
an advance notice to the trustees.

Accountant Rony Elroy has been appointed as expert for examining
the debt arrangement in the Company.

In July 2013, Elbit Imaging's controlling shareholders, Europe-
Israel MMS Ltd. and Mr. Mordechay Zisser, notified the Company
that the Tel Aviv District Court has appointed Adv. Giroa Erdinast
as a receiver with regards to the ordinary shares of the Company
held by Europe Israel securing Europe Israel's obligations under
its loan agreement with Bank Hapoalim B.M.  The judgment stated
that the Receiver is not authorized to sell the Company's shares
at this stage.  Following a request of Europe-Israel, the Court
also delayed any action to be taken with regards to the sale of
those shares for a period of 60 days.  Europe Israel and
Mr. Zisser have also notified the Company that they utterly reject
the Bank's claims and intend to appeal the Court's ruling.


ERICKSON INC: Common Stock Delisted From NASDAQ
-----------------------------------------------
Erickson Incorporated received on Nov. 10, 2016, a deficiency
letter from the staff of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC notifying the
Company that in accordance with Listing Rules 5101, 5110(b), and
IM51011, the staff of NASDAQ has determined that the Company's
common stock will be delisted from NASDAQ.

According to the Notification Letter, the delisting is a
consequence of: (i) the filing by the Company and its subsidiaries
of voluntary petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division for reorganization
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and associated public
interest concerns raised by the filing; (ii) concerns regarding the
residual equity interest of the existing listed securities holders;
and (iii) concerns about the Company's ability to sustain
compliance with all requirements for continued listing on The
NASDAQ Stock Market.  The Chapter 11 cases are being jointly
administered under the caption "In re Erickson Incorporated, et
al", Case No. 16-34393.

Given the continued listing requirements, the early status of the
bankruptcy case and the demands the bankruptcy case has posed on
the Company's resources, the Company does not plan to appeal the
NASDAQ staff's determination to delist the Company's common stock.
Accordingly, trading of the Company's common stock will be
suspended at the opening of business on Nov. 21, 2016, and a Form
25-NSE will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
which will remove the Company's common stock from listing and
registration on NASDAQ.

After the Company's common stock is delisted by NASDAQ, it may
trade on the OTC Markets Group Inc. or the OTC Bulletin Board.  The
Company's common stock will be eligible for trading only on the
Pink Sheets unless and until it is eligible for trading on the
OTCBB.  OTCBB trading may occur only if a market maker applies to
quote the Company's common stock; however, a potential market
maker's application to quote the Company's common stock on OTCBB
will not be cleared unless the Company is current in its reporting
obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
There is no assurance that the Company will be current in its
reporting obligations, that any market maker will apply to quote
the Company's common stock or that the Company's common stock will
become eligible to trade on the OTCBB.

                         About Erickson

Founded in 1971, Erickson is a vertically-integrated manufacturer
and operator of the powerful heavy-lift Erickson S-64 Aircrane
helicopter, and is a leading global provider of aviation services.
Erickson currently possesses a diverse fleet of 69 rotary-wing and
fixed-wing aircraft that support a variety of government and civil
customers worldwide.  

Jeff Roberts was appointed as president and chief executive officer
in April 2015.

Erickson Incorporated and six affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 16-34393) on Nov. 8,
2016.

The Debtors have hired Haynes and Boone, LLP, as counsel; Imperial
Capital LLC, as investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal as financial
and restructuring advisor; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants as
claims and noticing agent.  KCC's case Web site is
http://www.kccllc.net/erickson


ERIN ENERGY: Incurs $23.5 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------
Erin Energy Corporation reported a net loss attributable to the
Company of $23.47 million on $28.61 million of revenues for the
three months ended Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss
attributable to the Company of $58.68 million on $28.66 million of
revenues for the same period during the prior year.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss attributable to the Company of $78.45 million on $56.69
million of revenues compared to a net loss attributable to the
Company of $100.9 million on $28.66 million of revenues for the
nine months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Erin Energy had $342.4 million in total
assets, $503.6 million in total liabilities and a total capital
deficiency of $161.2 million.

Segun Omidele, chief executive officer, commented, "In the third
quarter, our strategy remained focused on restructuring our balance
sheet and growing our production.  We had success in lowering some
of our outstanding AP balances and our effort to raise additional
capital for our next drilling campaign is progressing well with the
expectation that drilling activities will commence soon."

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/nE52kk

                        About Erin Energy

Houston, Texas-based Erin Energy Corporation is an independent oil
and gas exploration and production company focused on energy
resources in Africa.  The Company's strategy is to acquire and
develop high-potential exploration and production assets in Africa,
and to explore and develop those assets through strategic
partnerships with national oil companies, indigenous local partners
and other independent oil companies.  Erin Energy Corporation seeks
to build and operate a strategic portfolio of high-impact
exploration and near-term development projects with significant
production, reserves and resources growth potential.  The Company
has production and exploration projects offshore Nigeria, as well
as exploration licenses offshore Ghana, Kenya and Gambia, and
onshore Kenya.

Erin Energy reported a net loss attributable to the Company of
$451.5 million on $68.42 million of revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss attributable to the Company
of $96.06 million on $53.84 million of revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014.

Grant Thornton LLP, Houston, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company incurred net losses in
each of the years ended Dec. 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and as of
Dec. 31, 2015, the Company's current liabilities exceeded its
current assets by $314.8 million.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


ERNEST SHEPHERD: Plan Confirmation Hearing on Jan. 4
----------------------------------------------------
The Hon. James P. Smith of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Georgia has conditionally approved Ernest W. Shepherd's
disclosure statement filed on Nov. 4, 2016, referring to the
Debtor's plan of reorganization filed on Nov. 4, 2016.

The hearing for final approval of the disclosure statement and the
hearing on confirmation of the plan, will be held on Jan. 4, 2017,
at 11:00 a.m.

Dec. 15, 2016, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the disclosure statement and confirmation of
the plan.  Dec. 15 is also fixed as the last day for filing written
acceptances or rejections of the Plan.

Ernest W. Shepherd filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 16-50560) on March 14, 2016.


EVERARDO MACA: Disclosures OK'd; Dec. 14 Plan Confirmation Hearing
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada has approved Everardo Maca's disclosure
statement for the Debtor's plan of reorganization.

A hearing on the confirmation of the Plan will be held on Dec. 14,
2016, at 9:30 a.m.

Class 3 creditor PennyMac Corp. will be paid $270,129.73 at 0% for
30 years.  Payments will commence January 2015 through December
2045.

Everardo Maca filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Nev. Case No. 14-17017).  

The Debtor is represented by:

     Corey B. Beck, Esq.
     THE LAW OFFICE OF COREY B. BECK, P.C.
     425 South Sixth Street
     Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
     Tel: (702) 678-1999
     Fax: (702) 678-6788
     E-mail: www.becksbk@yahoo.com


EVERGREEN HEALTH: Hecht-Lead Auction of Caseville Property on Jan 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Evergreen Health Services, Inc., and its affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to authorize
the bidding procedures in connection with the sale of real property
located at 4330 Port Austin Rd., Caseville, Michigan, outside the
ordinary course of business to Cynthia Hecht for $125,000, subject
to overbid.

In October 2014, Debtors entered into a Residential Real Estate
Listing Agreement with Osentoski Realty with Dale Ignash as the
Broker, a reputable broker in the Caseville, Michigan area and
listed the property for sale with a listing price of $325,000.  The
property was continuously listed with Osentoski Realty through
October 2015.  On Dec. 15, 2015, the Debtors entered into a
marketing agreement with David L. Kraft Realty Co., LLC and the
property was again listed for sale with a listing price of$299,900.
The asking price was subsequently reduced to $289,000.  Because of
market conditions and the unique nature of the property, the
Debtors' Broker and Debtors were unsuccessful in selling the
property.

Subsequent to the expiration of the listing period, the Debtor
Richard Kelterbom received a proposed Purchase Agreement for the
property from the Debtor's son's wife Hecht in the amount of
$125,000.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/Evergreen_Health_86_Sales.pdf

The Debtors intend for the Hecht Offer to serve as the Stalking
Horse Bid throughout the proposed sale.  The Debtors believe and
assert that the Bidding Procedures are appropriate for the
transaction, and requests entry of an order providing for the
Bidding Procedures.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

          a. Qualified Bid: $135,000

          b. Deposit: $25,000

          c. Bid Deadline: No later than 5:00 p.m. (PET) on the day
that is 2 Business Days prior to the sale date.

          d. Auction: The Auction will commence at 10:00 a.m. on
Jan. 6, 2017 at the offices of Lynn M. Brimer, Strobl & Sharp,
P.C., 300 East Long Lake Road, Suite 200, Bloomfield Hills,
Michigan.

          e. Bid Increment: $5,000

          f. Successful Bid: The highest or otherwise best offer
for the property.

          g. Closing: Unless otherwise ordered by the Court,
closing on the property will occur in accordance with the terms of
the Successful Bid.  In the event closing does not occur in
accordance with the material terms of the Successful Bid, then
within 5 days after the scheduled Closing Date, the Debtors,
through their counsel, may notify the party that asserted the next
highest or otherwise best offer for the property other than the
Successful Bid that its Qualified Bid is accepted and that its bid
has become the Successful Bid.  Closing on the new Successful Bid
will occur within 14 days after its receipt of the Debtors'
notification.

          h. Escrow of Good Faith Deposits: The Good Faith Deposits
of all Qualified Bidders (except for the Successful Bidder) will be
held in the Strobl & Sharp, P.C. client trust account and will be
segregated until the Closing.  If a Successful Bidder fails to
consummate an approved sale because of a breach or failure to
perform on the part of such Successful Bidder, the Debtors will be
entitled to retain the Good Faith Deposit as liquidated damages
resulting from the breach or failure to perform by the Successful
Bidder.  The Debtors will return all good faith deposits
immediately upon Closing.

          i. In the event the Hecht Offer is not the successful
bid, Hecht will be entitled to a fee in the amount of$2,500 as a
break-up fee.

Due to the need to transition the Debtors property as quickly as
possible and in order to protect and preserve the property, the
Debtors ask the Court to waive the stay period as set forth in Fed.
R. Bank. P. 6004 (h).

The Purchaser can be reached at:

           Cynthia Hecht
           9518 Westwood Cir.
           Clarkston, MI 48348

                   About Evergreen Health Services

Evergreen Health Services, Inc., sought chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 16-53329) on Sept. 28, 2016, the same
date that Janis Meredith-Kelterborn, the Debtor's sole shareholder,
officer and director, filed a joint voluntary chapter 11 petition
with her husband Richard Kelterborn.

The Debtor estimated assets in the range of $100,001 to 500,000 and
$500,001 to $1,000,000 in debt.

The Debtor tapped Lynn M. Brimer, Esq. and Pamela S. Ritter, Esq.,
at Strobl & Sharp, P.C., as counsel.

The petition was signed by Janis Kelterborn, president.


EXTREME PLASTICS: Cash Use Allowed on Final Basis Until March 31
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware authorized
Extreme Plastics Plus, Inc., and its affiliated debtors to use cash
collateral on a final basis, until March 31, 2017.

The Court has previously approved the Committee Stipulation, which
provided for a consensual process for the sale of the Debtors'
assets and the distribution of proceeds in connection therewith,
and the entry of the Amended and Restated Final Order.  The entry
of the Amended and Restated Final Order was predicated upon the
assumption that the settlement embodied in the Committee
Stipulation would be approved by the Court and consummated
according to its terms.

The Debtors are indebted to the Prepetition Lenders in the
approximate amount of $50 million.  The Prepetition Lenders' Agent
holds valid and perfected liens and encumbrances on substantially
all of the Debtors' real and personal property, and all their
products, rents, and proceeds, except for the real property located
at Marion Land Regional Business Park, 360 Epic Circle Drive,
Fairmont, West Virginia, and all motor vehicles, trucks, and
trailers owned by a Debtor, as well as additional hitches and other
titled items owned by one of the Debtors, some of which are subject
to the liens of third parties.

The Agent consented to the Debtor's use of cash collateral, which
will commence on the date that the following will have occurred:

     (1) The Final Order has been entered by the Court; and

     (2) the Agent receives all cash proceeds from the going
concern sale of all, or substantially all, of the Debtors' assets
that has been consented to by the Agent, and all cash of the
Debtors at the closing of the Sale.

The approved Wind Down Budget provides for total expenses in the
amount of $300,000.

The Debtors can use cash collateral through the earlier of:

     (1) March 31, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.;

     (2) the conversion to chapter 7 or dismissal of the Chapter 11
cases; and

     (3) the time when the Agent's consent to the Debtor's use of
cash collateral is terminated pursuant to the terms of the Final
Order.

The Debtor was ordered to fund the following reserves at the
closing of the Sale:

     (1) $1,343,898 on account of claims allowed pursuant to
section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code in the Chapter 11 cases;

     (2) such amount as to be agreed in good faith by the Debtors
and the Agent at or prior to the closing of the Sale, which the
Debtors and the Agent estimate to be no more than $310,400, plus
such amounts as to be agreed in good faith by the Debtors and the
Agent at or prior to the closing of the Sale for ordinary course
liabilities entitled to priority and not assumed by the purchaser
in the Sale with respect to current employees of the Debtors;

     (3) the amounts, if any, of non-ordinary course liabilities
entitled to priority and not assumed by the purchaser in the Sale,
including with respect to current employees of the Debtors who are
not offered employment by the purchaser in connection with the
Sale, in an amount not to exceed $100,000;

     (4) $400,000 as required by section 6 of the Committee
Stipulation; and

     (5) $75,000 for the Professional Fees of the Creditors'
Committee as required by section 7 of the Committee Stipulation.

The wind down of the Debtors' estates will proceed as follows:

     (1) The Debtors will employ Anthony C. Labrosciano as their
Chief Executive Officer for purposes of winding up the Debtors'
estates.  Mr. Labrosciano will wind down the Debtors' estates for a
fixed fee of $50,000.

     (2) The expected period of all, or substantially all, of the
wind down will commence on the date of the Wind Down Commencement
and will continue until the Debtors, the Agent, and Mr. Labrosciano
agree that the wind down has been substantially completed.

The Agent, for the benefit of the Lenders, was granted a valid,
perfected, enforceable, and non-avoidable first priority security
interest in, lien and mortgage upon all assets and property of the
Debtors and their estates, and all their proceeds, rents, products
and profits.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended and Restated Final Order,
dated November 21, 2016, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/ExtremePlastics2016_1610221css_635.pdf

A full-text copy of the Wind Down Budget, dated Nov. 21, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/ExtremePlastics2016_1610221css_635_1.pdf

                    About Extreme Plastics Plus

Founded in 2007, privately-held Extreme Plastics Plus, Inc.,
operates an environmental containment business specializing in
providing environmental lining, above ground storage tanks,
composite rig mats, secondary steel wall containment systems, and
closed loop solids control services, primarily for the oil and gas
industry.  Extreme Plastics has six facilities in Fairmont, West
Virginia, Tunkhannock, Pennsylvania, St. Clairsville, Ohio, Moore,
Texas, Odessa, Texas, and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

The stock of Extreme Plastics is held entirely by EPP Intermediate
Holdings, Inc.  The stock of EPP Intermediate is held entirely by
EPP Holding Company, LLC, a non-debtor.

Extreme Plastics, and affiliate EPP Intermediate Holdings, Inc.,
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
16-10221) on Jan. 31, 2016, as the ongoing decline in the price of
oil and natural gas negatively impacted demand of the Debtors'
services.

Extreme Plastics estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and
$50 million to $100 million in debt.  EPP Intermediate estimated $1
million to $10 million in assets and $50 million to $100 million in
debt.

As of the Petition Date, Extreme Plastics owes $49.5 million under
a secured facility provided by lenders led by Citizens Bank of
Pennsylvania, as agent.  The facility is secured by a lien in
substantially all of the Debtors' assets, as well as a pledge of
100% of the equity in Extreme Plastics and EPP Intermediate.

The Debtors are represented by William D. Sullivan, Esq., at
Sullivan Hazeltine Allinson LLC, and have retained Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed five members to the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee selected Reed
Smith LLP as counsel.



FAIRFIELD SENTRY: Bid for Approval of 2011 Claims Assignment Denied
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Stuart M. Bernstein of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York denied the motion filed by
Kenneth Krys and Charlotte Caulfield, in their capacities as
liquidators and foreign representatives of Fairfield Sentry
("Sentry") Limited, Fairfield Sigma Limited ("Sigma") and Fairfield
Lambda Limited ("Lambda," and together with Sentry and Sigma, the
"Fairfield Funds") seeking approval of the 2011 assignment of
certain claims to Irving H. Picard, the trustee for the liquidation
of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BLMIS).

Sentry was a British Virgin Islands (BVI) entity that served as a
BLMIS "feeder fund" investing approximately 95% of its assets with
BLMIS.  Sigma and Lambda, also BVI entities, operated as sub-feeder
funds that invested their assets with Sentry, and hence, invested
indirectly through Sentry with BLMIS.

The Fairfield Funds held several accounts with BLMIS, and each
filed customer claims.  Picard counterclaimed, commencing an
adversary proceeding against the Fairfield Funds and others
seeking, among other things, to avoid and recover approximately $3
billion that Sentry had withdrawn from its BLMIS accounts in the
years leading up the BLMIS liquidation.

Picard and the liquidators eventually reached a settlement in 2011
that was memorialized in a settlement agreement.  The settlement
was a comprehensive and complex deal that involved the resolution
of claims inter se, the assignment of claims, mutual releases and
the sharing of litigation proceeds.  Included in the agreement was
an assignment to Picard by the liquidators of claims against the
individuals and entities that managed the Fairfield Funds.

The liquidators sought approval of their assignment of the claims
to Picard under section 363(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.  Picard
supported the motion, adding that denial of the motion might result
in the abrogation of the settlement agreement and uncertainty for
the liquidators and the trustee.  The liquidators, however, never
sought approval of the settlement agreement from the bankruptcy
court in the chapter 15 case, and still don't.

The motion was opposed by Morning Mist Holdings Limited and Miguel
Lomeli, allegedly beneficial owners of shares in Sentry.  The
liquidators replied in further support of the motion, adding that
Morning Mis and Lomeli lacked standing to be heard in connection
with the motion.

Judge Bernstein, however, found it unnecessary to resolve the issue
of the objectors' standing because the motion sought relief that
cannot be granted in the manner it is sought.  The judge explained
that, as a threshold matter, the liquidators cannot carve the
management claims out from the settlement agreement and seek
approval of that one part of the settlement without seeking
approval of the settlement agreement as a whole.  Accordingly,
Judge Bernstein denied the motion without prejudice to the
liquidators' right to seek approval of the settlement agreement if
they deem it necessary and appropriate.

A full-text copy of Judge Bernstein's November 22, 2016 memorandum
decision and order is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb10-13164-847.pdf

Kenneth Krys & Charlotte Caulfield, Foreign Representatives of
Fairfield Sentry Limited, Fairfield Sigma Limited, and Fairfield
Lambda Limited are represented by:

          David J. Molton, Esq.
          May Orenstein, Esq.
          Daniel J. Saval, Esq.
          Marek P. Krzyzowski, Esq
          BROWN RUDNICK LLP
          Seven Times Square
          New York, NY 10036
          Tel: (212)209-4800
          Fax: (212)209-4801
          Email: dmolton@brownrudnick.com
                 morenstein@brownrudnick.com
                 dsaval@brownrudnick.com
                 krzyzowski@brownrudnick.com

Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated
Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and
Representative for the Estate of Bernard L. Madoff are represented
by:

          David J. Sheehan, Esq.
          Thomas L. Long, Esq.
          Catherine E. Woltering, Esq.
          BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
          45 Rockefeller Plaza
          New York, NY 10111
          Tel: (212)589-4200
          Fax: (212)589-4201
          Email: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com
                 tlong@bakerlaw.com
                 cwoltering@bakerlaw.com

Morning Mist Holdings Limited and Miguel Lomeli are represented
by:

          Robert A. Wallner, Esq.
          Kristi Stahnke McGregor, Esq.
          MILBERG LLP
          One Pennsylvania Plaza
          New York, NY 10119
          Tel: (212)594-5300
          Fax: (212)868-1229
          Email: rwallner@milberg.com
                 kmcgregor@milberg.com

            -- and --

          Stephen A. Weiss, Esq.
          Parvin Aminolroaya, Esq.
          SEEGER WEISS LLP
          77 Water Street
          New York, NY 10005
          Tel: 877)912-2668
          Email: sweiss@seegerweiss.com
                 
                        About Fairfield Sentry

Fairfield Sentry is being liquidated under the supervision of the
Commercial Division of the High Court of Justice in the British
Virgin Islands.  It is one of the funds owned by the Fairfield
Greenwich Group, an investment firm founded in 1983 in New York
City.  Fairfield Sentry and other Greenwich funds had among the
largest exposures to the Bernard L. Madoff fraud.

Fairfield Sentry Limited filed for Chapter 15 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 10-13164) on June 14, 2010.

Fairfield Sentry became the subject of a BVI liquidation, and a
BVI court appointed the Liquidator under BVI law.  The Liquidator
then sought recognition of the BVI liquidation as a foreign main
proceeding under Chapter 15 of the Code in the Southern District
of New York.  The Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting
recognition of the Fairfield Sentry case on July 22, 2010,
enabling the Liquidator to use the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to
protect and administer Fairfield Sentry's assets in the U.S.


FARMERS MUTUAL: A.M. Best Affirms B(Fair) Finc'l. Strength Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A.M. Best has affirmed the Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of B
(Fair) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating (ICR) of "bb+" of
Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Farmers) (Okarche, OK). The
outlook for the Long-Term ICR has been revised to stable from
negative, while the outlook for the FSR remains stable. The revised
Long-Term ICR outlook reflects improvement in the company's
operating results and risk-adjusted capitalization in recent years.
Concurrently, A.M. Best has withdrawn the Credit Ratings (ratings)
as the company has requested to no longer participate in A.M.
Best's interactive rating process.

The ratings reflect Farmers' historical below average operating
results mostly driven by unprofitable underwriting results in prior
years due to weather-related events, inadequate pricing, fire
losses and an elevated expense ratio. As a predominantly single
state property writer operating exclusively in Oklahoma, the
company is further exposed to potential changes in the judicial and
regulatory environments. Also, the company maintains an expense
disadvantage as reflected by its elevated expense ratio relative to
the personal property composite.

Farmers' positive rating attributes are derived from its moderate
underwriting leverage and high quality investment risk profile. In
recent years, the favorable turnaround in operating results has
been attributed to several factors including the lack of
catastrophe events, improved underwriting and pricing, as well as
enhanced exposure risk management to lower concentrations in
weather-prone areas. However, the company will remain challenged
due to its ongoing exposure to weather-related events and
competitive market conditions. Disciplined underwriting and
improved enterprise risk management capabilities will remain key
factors in the company's ongoing success.


FARMHAND SUPPLY: Rabo Agrifinance Wants to Prohibit Cash Use
------------------------------------------------------------
Rabo Agrifinance, LLC, f/k/a Rabo AgriFinance, Inc., asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to prohibit
Farmhand Supply, LLC, from using cash collateral.

Rabo Agrifinance also asks, in the alternative, that the Court
require the Debtor to provide it with adequate protection in order
for the Debtor to continue using cash collateral.

Rabo Agrifinance contends that spouses John Dale Murpy and Linda Jo
Murphy, the Debtor, J Murphy Farms are indebted to it for:

     (1) $6,119,571 under a Term Loan Note;
     (2) $1,766,809 under a Crop Production Note;
     (3) $365,540 under a Line of Credit-1 Note; and
     (4) $1,154,351 under a Line of Credit-2 Note.

Rabo Agrifinance says that J Murphy Farms is obligated to it in the
amount of $218,268.05  Rabo Agrifinance further says that certain
Borrowers granted it liens and security interests in various assets
owned by the Debtor and/or Murphy Debtors, including real estate,
farm products, proceeds of crop insurance, profits, inventory,
equipment, and accounts, among others.

Rabo Agrifinance tells the Court that the Debtor is currently
utilizing the Cash Collateral without RAF’s consent and without
obtaining authorization from the Court.  It further tells the Court
that it holds liens on the accounts, contract rights, inventory and
equipment of Debtor, along with the proceeds generated from this
collateral.

Rabo Agrifinance asserts that the Murphy Debtors are operating a
number of additional interrelated businesses, including a car wash,
antique store and restaurant.  Rabo Agrifinance believes that the
Murphy Debtors and the Debtor are currently co-mingling and using
funds to operate the various businesses without accounting for the
same.  Rabo Agrifinance further asserts that in the absence of the
implementation of accounting procedures, the profitability or
appropriateness of the use of cash collateral cannot be determined.
  It adds that continuing to operate without basic accounting and
budgetary safeguards creates the substantial risk that the cash
collateral will be spent without concomitant benefit to, and to the
prejudice of, the bankruptcy estate and Rabo Agrifinance.

A full-text copy of Rabo Agrifinance, LLC's Motion, dated November
21, 2016, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/FarmhandSupply2016_1610742_22.pdf

Rabo Agrifinance, LLC is represented by:

          David L. Going, Esq.
          Erin M. Edelman, Esq.
          ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
          7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1800
          St. Louis, MO 63105
          Telephone: (314) 621-5070
          E-mail: dgoing@armstrongteasdale.com
                  eedelman@armstrongteasdale.com
    
                         About Farmhand Supply

Farmhand Supply, LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 16-10742) on Sept. 9, 2016, estimating
its assets and liabilities at $0 to $50,000 each.  J. Michael
Payne, Esq., at Limbaugh, Russell, Payne & Howard, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


FREDERICK KEITEL: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment with 4% Interest
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Frederick Keitel, III, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida a fifth amended disclosure statement
accompanying his plan of reorganization, which proposes to pay all
costs and expenses of administration within thirty days of the date
of confirmation of the Plan.

Class 1 - The disputed secured claim filed by Thomas D'Agostino,
Sr. in the amount of $337,659.41, was satisfied on Feb. 5, 2016
when he received a payment of $4,431,815.55. To the extent the
claim is valid, it is secured by the Debtor’s stock in FJK IV
Properties. If it is a valid claim, it will be amortized at 4% and
the Debtor will pay $6,218.51 per month for a period of 60 months.

Class 2 - Tasha Enterprises, Inc.  Tasha Enterprises has filed a
secured claim in the amount of
$403,543.29.  The claim is secured by proceeds from the sale of the
property located at 412 Brazilian
Court.  It is estimated that Tasha has a valid secured claim in the
approximate amount of $125,000.00
which will be satisfied from the funds held by Furr and Cohen. The
remaining amount owed will be
paid in accordance with Class 3.

Class 3 - The estimated, undisputed, unsecured claims total
approximately $$131,906.54. If it
is determined that is the extent of the claims, the amount will be
amortized at 4% and the creditors will receive a monthly payment of
$2,429.26 over 60 months. If Thomas D'Agostino, Sr., Thomas
D’Agostino, Jr.or their entities have valid claims against the
Debtor, the Debtor will need to liquidate his shares in FJK IV
Properties. Creditors will be paid in full within 60 months of the
effective date at an interest rate of 4%.

The plan will be funded by the income to be received by the Debtor
as the developer of the
Florida Capital Management project and money in escrow.

A full-text copy of the Fifth Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb15-21654-407.pdf

As previously reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, Judge Erik
P. Kimball of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of Florida has denied approval of the Debtor's third amended
disclosure statement dated Oct. 25, 2016, in connection with the
Debtor's second amended plan of reorganization.  The Debtor was
given until Nov. 7, 2016, to file an amended disclosure statement
and an amended plan.

             About Frederick Keitel

Frederick J. Keitel, III sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 15-21654) on June 29,
2015.

Mr. Keitel owns various interests in companies that own commercial
real estate. At the time of the filing of his case, Mr. Keitel's
companies and their assets were valued at over $20 million.


FRYMIRE SERVICES: Seeks to Modify Use of Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------
Frymire Services, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas for authorization to use cash
collateral, pursuant to certain modifications/variances.

The Debtor says that since the Petition Date, it has paid its main
lender, Capital One, $190,500 in adequate protection payments
which paid down its prepetition debt.

The Debtor relates that certain upcoming expenditures are expected
to be higher than originally projected in August.  It further
relates that most significantly, the Debtor's prior insurance
broker did not anticipate the large, 36% increase in health
insurance premiums now faced by the Debtor.

The Debtor says that in order to counter anticipated increase in
certain expenses, it has made cuts in other areas, making the
overall net effect manageable.  The Debtor further says that it
reached out to Capital One for approval of additional monthly
expenses projected for November 2016 to January 2017.  The Debtor
adds that Capital One approved the Debtor's November
modifications/variances and that the parties agreed it best to seek
the Court's approval on future modifications/variances in the event
the parties could not otherwise agree to them.

The Debtor tells the Court that since it has not yet received
written approval from Capital One for modifications for December
and the succeeding months.  The Debtor wants the Court to approve
the use of cash collateral consistent with the modifications/
variances.  The Debtor further tells the Court that in the
nine-month aggregate, the budgeted expenses do not represent a
significant variance from what was previously approved and the
Debtor maintains that it will be profitable overall during this
period.

The Debtor's Motion is scheduled for hearing on Dec. 15, 2016 at
9:39 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Nov. 21, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/FrymireServices2016_1632814sgj11_144.pdf

                         About Frymire Services

Formed in Texas in April 1956, Frymire Services, Inc., operates a
commercial and residential services company specializing in HVAC
heating/cooling and plumbing.

Frymire Services filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
N.D. Tex. Case No. 16-32814) on July 15, 2016.  The petition was
signed by George R. Frymire, president.
Judge Stacey G. Jernigan presides over the case.

The Debtor estimated assets and debts at $1 million to $10 million
at the time of the chapter 11 filing.

The Debtor is represented by Bryan Christopher Assink, Esq., Mark
A. Castillo, Esq., and Joshua Lee Shepherd, Esq., at Curtis
Castillo, Esq.


FULLER PROPERTIES: Sale of Franklin Property for $125K Approved
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Keith L. Phillips of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia authorized Fuller Properties, LLC's
sale of real property commonly known as 401 Chestnut Street in the
City of Franklin, Virginia to Franklin Realty Ventures, LLC, for
$125,000.

The sale is free and clear of all liens and interests.

The Debtor's request to shorten the notice required by Rule 2002 is
granted.

Consistent with the Court's order of July 13, 2016, the sales
proceeds will be paid to New Horizon Bank at closing.  Under the
order, the Debtor is obligated to pay New Horizon $125,000 within
120 days of the effective date (Nov. 22, 2016) in consideration for
the release of its lien.

                    About Fuller Properties

Fuller Properties, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.
Va. Case No. 15-35083) on Oct. 1, 2015.  The petition was signed
by
Lee A. Barnes, Jr., managing member.  The Debtor estimated assets
and liabilities in the range of $100,001 to $500,000.  The Debtor
tapped Troy Savenko, Esq. at Kaplan, Voekler, Cunningham & Frank,
PLC as counsel.


GABEL LEASE: U.S. Trustee Seeks Ch. 11 Examiner Appointment
-----------------------------------------------------------
Samuel K. Crocker, the United States Trustee, files a motion asking
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas to direct the
appointment of a Chapter 11 Examiner for Gabel Lease Service, Inc.

The Debtor is owned 100% by Brian Gabel. Mr. Gable and his wife,
Carolyn, are currently responsible for the daily operations of
Gabel.  Based on a testimony provided at the Sec. 341 meeting of
creditors, the Debtor may have avoidance actions against Mr. and
Mrs. Gabel, and other insiders and non-insiders, the U.S. Trustee
tells the Court.  The amount of the recovery actions could exceed
$250,000 and it puts Mr. and Mrs. Gabel in a conflicted position,
the U.S. Trustee asserts.

Moreover, the U.S. Trustee says the Debtor is currently using the
cash collateral of First State Bank (FSB) via an interim order and
is seeking permission on a final basis. However, it appeared that
none of the parties have seen FSB's loan and the perfection
documents to confirm whether its security interest is as what the
Debtor asserts it to be, the U.S. Trustee points out.

Therefore, the U.S. Trustee asserts, it is necessary for a
fiduciary to provide an independent examination of the potential
recovery actions as well as the security interest of FSB. The U.S.
Trustee also believes that it is in the best interest of the
creditors and parties in interest that an examiner be appointed.

The U.S. Trustee is represented by:

         Charles S. Glidewell, Esq.
         Marjorie J. Creasey, Esq.
         OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
         215 Dean A. McGee, Fourth Floor
         Oklahoma City, OK 73102
         Fax: (405) 231-5960/231-5958
         Email: Charles.Glidewell@usdoj.gov
                Marjorie.Creasey@usdoj.gov

              About Gabel Lease Service

Gabel Lease Service, Inc., operates as a roustabout company in and
around Ness City, Kansas.  GLS also sells pumping units to
customers. Due to the current economic climate, GLS's business
suffered a significant decrease in cash flow.  The drop in
oil-and-gas prices has decreased the frequency in which GLS
provides roustabout services to customers and decreased the number
of customers willing to purchase pumping units from GLS.

Early 2016, Larson Engineering, Inc., d/b/a Larson Operating Co.,
filed suit against GLS in Ness County District Court, alleging that
it purchased 28 Gabel pumping units in 2008 and 2009 from GLS and
took delivery of only 5 pumping unit over a 5-year period.
Eventually, on Dec. 7, 2015, Larson claims it demanded the delivery
of the remaining units and filed suit when GLS failed to do so.

Facing the Larson Suit and other cash-flow problems, Gabel Lease
Service filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Kan. 16-11948), on
Oct. 5, 2016.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert E. Nugent. The
petition was signed by Brian Gabel, president.  The Debtor is
represented by Nicholas R. Grillot, Esq., at Hinkle Law Firm, LLC.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated assets at $100,000 to
$500,000 and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million in estimated
liabilities.


GLOBAL AMENITIES: Ch. 11 Trustee Sought Amid Mismanagement
----------------------------------------------------------
ASI Holding Company, Inc., filed a motion asking the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina to direct the
appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee for Global Amenities, LLC.

ASI, a creditor, asserts that cause exists for the appointment of a
trustee due to the incompetence and/or gross mismanagement by the
Debtor's previous and current management.

According to ASI, the Debtor's current management by its owners, in
any capacity, will inevitably limit management's objectivity,
independence, and certainly credibility.  The inability or refusal
of the Debtor's managers/owners having failed since the inception
of the case with basic non-compliance with the Bankruptcy Code,
including the payment of pre-petition creditors post-petition,
ongoing conflict with interest adverse of the Debtor, use of the
Debtor to fund their personal litigation expenses in the Florida
Action and transferring viable assets on the date of the bankruptcy
filing to affiliates and/or subsidiaries of the debtor provides no
adequate protection for any creditor, ASI further asserts.

The hearing to consider approval of the request for appointment of
a Chapter 11 Trustee will be held on January 3, 2017.  Within 30
days after the November 16, 2016 service of the Notice of Motion,
any party objecting to the relief sought must (1) file with the
clerk a written objection to the Motion for Appointment of Chapter
11 Trustee; (2) serve on the Movant; and (3) file with the clerk a
Certificate of Service. Failure to comply with the procedure may be
denied the opportunity to appear and be heard on the proceeding
before the court.

ASI is represented by:

         William H. Short, Jr., Esq.
         ADAMS AND REESE LLP
         1501 Main Street, 5th Floor
         Post Office Box 2285
         Columbia, S.C. 29202
         Tel.: (803) 254-4190

                About Global Amenities

Global Amenities, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 16-04635) on September 13,
2016. The petition was signed by Andrew Manios, managing member.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.


GOLFSMITH INT'L: BH Buying Austin Golfsmith Campus for $22M
-----------------------------------------------------------
Golfsmith International Holdings, Inc., and its affiliates ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to authorize the
sale process in connection with the sale of Golfsmith's 40-acre
campus located in Austin, Texas, to B.H. Management, Inc., for
$22,150,000, subject to overbid.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Dec. 13, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
(ET).  The objection deadline is Dec. 6, 2016 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

Having recently received the Court's approval for the sale of
substantially all of Golfsmith's assets, the Debtors now seek to
implement the last phase of their "Sale Process" by conducting an
auction for the sale of Golfsmith Campus.

After extensive, arm's-length negotiations, the Debtors have
entered into a purchase and sale agreement, dated Nov. 22, 2016,
with the Stalking Horse Bidder.  Subject to due diligence during an
Inspection Period, BH has agreed to serve as a Stalking Horse
Bidder, and has offered to purchase the Assets for an aggregate
purchase price of $22,150,000.

The salient terms of the Stalking Horse Agreement are:

   a. On confirmation from BH by no later than Dec. 2, 2016 that BH
is prepared to purchase the Golfsmith Campus, the Stalking Horse
Agreement will become a binding bid for the Assets for a total
purchase price of $22,150,000.  As is customary, the Stalking Horse
Bidder has agreed to amend the purchase price to reflect any
overbid made by the Stalking Horse Bidder at the Auction.

    b. Good Faith Deposit: $250,000

    c. Earnest Money: $2,215,000. The Earnest Money will be held in
escrow by Chicago Title Co., a third-party escrow agent, to be
applied to the purchase price or returned to the Stalking Horse
Bidder, as applicable.

    d. Closing and Other Deadlines: The Stalking Horse Bidder may
terminate the Stalking Horse Agreement if the Sale Order has not
been entered on or before Jan. 20, 2017, unless otherwise agreed
upon in writing by the parties.  The Stalking Horse Agreement may
be terminated by either the Debtors or the Stalking Horse Bidder if
the closing of the Sale does not occur by the close of business on
Feb. 15, 2017, subject to certain limitations.

    e. Break-Up Fee: $500,000 (less than 2.5% of the purchase
price)

The Debtors seek authorization to provide BH with a customary bid
protection in the form of a $500,000 "Break-up Fee."  The Break-Up
Fee is commensurate with both the size and nature of the proposed
sale and the efforts that have been expended by BH as the Stalking
Horse Bidder.

To ensure an efficient wind down of the Debtors' estates, the
Debtors seek authorization to sell the Golfsmith Campus by no later
than the end of January 2017.  The Debtors therefore propose to
establish Jan. 6, 2017 as the last date by which interested parties
may submit bids for the Assets to qualify to participate in the
auction, which the Debtors propose to hold on Jan. 12, 2017.  The
Debtors believe the schedule is reasonable and appropriate for two
reasons.

First, the Debtors and their advisors have spent several months
marketing all of the Debtors' assets, including the Golfsmith
Campus, to over 200 potential strategic and financial buyers.  They
believe that most parties in the universe of potential purchasers
have been on notice of the sale of the Golfsmith Campus since at
least the commencement of these chapter 11 cases, if not before,
and, therefore, such parties already have been afforded a
significant time to prepare for an auction. Second, the Debtors
would like to close a sale of the Assets as quickly as possible to
complete the wind down of their estates and avoid unnecessary
administrative expenses that will decrease the amount of funds
available for distribution to creditors.

Granting the relief requested, including authorizing the Debtors to
execute the Sale Process on their proposed timeline, will allow the
Debtors to generate as much value as possible for the Assets, which
will inure to the benefit of all parties in interest.

The Sale Procedures are designed to provide for a fair, timely, and
competitive Sale Process.  If approved, the Sale Procedures will
allow the Debtors to solicit and identify bids from potential
buyers that constitute the highest or otherwise best offer for the
Assets in a timely manner.

The salient terms of the Sale Procedures are:

    a. Sale Objection Deadline: Jan. 13, 2017, at 4:00 p.m. (PET)

    b. Bid Deadline: Jan. 6, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. (PET)

    c. Qualified Bid: Must exceed the Stalking Horse Bid by at
least $1,000,000.

    d. Good Faith Deposit: 10% of the offered purchase price.

    e. Other Bid Requirements: A Qualified Bid will (i) state that
the bid is formal, binding, and unconditional, is not subject to
further due diligence, and is irrevocable until the earlier of
either (a) Feb. 28, 2017, and (b) the first business day following
the close of a sale with a Successful Bidder for the Assets; (ii)
expressly state that the Prospective Bidder is committed to closing
the sale transactions contemplated by the Prospective Bidder's
Proposed APA by Jan. 19, 2017.

    f. Selection of Qualified Bidder: Jan. 9, 2017

    g. Bid Protections: Absent order of the Bankruptcy Court
otherwise, Prospective Bidders and Qualified Bidders, other than
the Stalking Horse Bidder, will not be allowed any break-up,
"topping," termination or other similar fee or expense
reimbursement for submitting a bid for the Assets or otherwise
participating in the Sale Process or the Auction.

    h. Auction:  January 12, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. (PET)

    i. Minimum Overbid: To be announced at the outset of the
Auction.

    j. Successful Bid: The highest or otherwise best bid for the
relevant Assets.

    k. Backup Bid: The next highest or otherwise best Qualified Bid
for the Assets after the Successful Bid.  Backup Bids will be open
and irrevocable until the earlier of (a) Feb. 28, 2017, or (b) the
first business day following the closing of a Sale with the
Successful Bidder.

A copy of the Stalking Horse Agreement and the Sales Procedures
attached to the Motion is available for free at:

         
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Golfsmith_International_506_Sales.pdf

Consistent with the timeline of the chapter 11 cases and the
Debtors' need to consummate a Sale of their remaining Assets as
quickly and efficiently as possible to minimize unnecessary
administrative expenses of their estates, the Debtors propose these
key dates and deadlines for the Sale Process:

    a. Hearing on Sale Procedures and entry of Sale Procedures
Order: Dec. 13, 2016, at 10:00 a.m

    b. Bid Deadline: Jan. 6, 2017, at 5:00 p.m.

    c. Deadline for Debtors to notify Prospective Bidders of their
status as Qualified Bidders: Jan. 9, 2017

    d. Auction to be held at Golfsmith Campus: Jan. 12, 2017, at
10:00 a.m.

    e. Sale Objection Deadline and Cure Objection Deadline: Jan.
13, 2017, at 4:00 p.m.

    f. Target date to publish Auction results and provide affected
counterparties with adequate assurance information, if applicable:
Jan. 13, 2017

    g. Adequate Assurance Objection Deadline: Jan. 17, 2017, at
9:00 a.m.

    h. Sale Hearing: Jan. 17, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.

    i. Target date to close sale transactions with Successful
Bidder: Jan. 19, 2017

The Sale Procedures provide for these noticing procedures:

    a. The Sale Notice: The Sale Notice will include the date,
time, and place of the Auction and the Sale Hearing, and the Sale
Objection Deadline.

       (i) Auction. If the Debtors receive, in addition to the
Stalking Horse Bid, a timely Qualified Bid for an acceptable
purchase price, the Debtors propose to hold the Auction at the
Golfsmith Campus on Jan. 12, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. (PET).

      (ii) Sale Objection Deadline: The Debtors propose that the
deadline for objecting to the proposed Sale to be Jan. 13, 2017, at
4:00 p.m. (PET).

     (iii) Sale Hearing: The Debtors propose the Sale Hearing to be
held on Jan. 17, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. (PET).

    b. Qualified Bids: On Jan. 9, 2017, the Debtors will notify
Prospective Bidders of whether they are Qualified Bidders and
invite any such Qualified Bidders to attend the Auction.

    c. Auction Results: The Debtors will use commercially
reasonable efforts to, by Jan. 13, 2017, file with the Court, serve
on the Sale Notice Parties, and cause to be published on the Prime
Clerk Website the results of the Auction.

The Debtors ask that the Court approve the Noticing Procedures.

The Debtors believe that there may be a relatively small number of
contracts related to the maintenance and operation of the Golfsmith
Campus that a purchaser may wish to be assumed and assigned.  The
cure objection deadline is Jan. 13, 2017, at 4:00 p.m. (PET).
Given that consummation of a sale of the Debtors' remaining Assets
is essential to the Debtors' efforts to maximize value for their
estates, any assumption of proposed Assumed Contracts in connection
with the Sale would be an exercise of the Debtors' sound business
judgment.

Any counterparty that wishes to object to the proposed assumption,
assignment, or potential designation of their contract, the subject
of which objection is a Successful Bidder's or Backup Bidder's
proposed form of adequate assurance of future performance must file
by Jan. 17, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. (PET).

The Debtors ask the Court to waive the 14-day stay requirements
under Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d).

The Purchaser:

          B.H. MANAGEMENT, INC.
          11111 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600
          Los Angeles, CA 90025
          Attn: Todd Allen, Esq.
          General Counsel
          E-mail: toss.allen@bhproperties.com

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Sharon Z. Weiss, Esq.
          BRYAN CAVE LLP
          120 Broadway, Suite 300
          Santa Monica, CA 90401-2386
          Telephone: (310) 576-2276
          Facsimile: (310) 260-7176
          E-mail: sharon.weiss@bryancave.com

                About Golfsmith International

Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Golfsmith International Holdings,
Inc., the parent company of Golfsmith International, Inc., is a
holding company. The Company is a specialty retailer of golf and
tennis equipment, apparel, footwear and accessories. The Company
operates as an integrated multi-channel retailer, providing its
customers the convenience of shopping in the retail stores across
United States, through its Internet site,
http://www.golfsmith.com/,and from its catalogs. The Company    
offers a product selection that features national brands,
pre-owned
clubs and its branded products. It offers a number of customer
services and customer care initiatives, including its club
trade-in
program, 30-day playability guarantee, 115% low-price guarantee,
its credit card, in-store golf lessons, and SmartFit, its
club-fitting program. As of Jan. 1, 2011, the Company operated 75
stores in 21 states and 33 markets.

Golfsmith International Holdings, Inc., and 12 affiliates filed
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 16-12033) on Sept.
14, 2016, and are represented by Mark D. Collins, Esq., John H.
Knight, Esq., Zachary I. Shapiro, Esq., and Brett M. Haywood,
Esq.,
at Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., in Wilmington, Delaware; and
Michael F. Walsh, Esq., David N. Griffiths, Esq., and Charles M.
Persons, Esq., at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, in New York.

The Debtors' financial advisor is Alvarez & Marsal North America,
LLC. The Debtors' investment banker is Jefferies LLC.  The
Debtors'
claims, noticing and solicitation agent is Prime Clerk LLC.  Pope
Shamsie & Dooley LLP serves as tax accountants.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had $100 million to $500 million
in estimated assets and $100 million to $500 million in estimated
liabilities.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, on Sept. 23, 2016,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors. The Committee hires Cooley LLP as lead
counsel, Chaitons LLP as Canadian counsel, Polsinelli PC as
Delaware counsel, Province, Inc. as financial advisor, and A&G
Realty Partners as real estate advisor.


GOPHER PROTOCOL: Delays Filing of Sept. 30 Form 10-Q
----------------------------------------------------
Gopher Protocol Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a Form 12b-25 notifying the delay in the filing of its
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended Sept. 30, 2016.
The Company said it Quarterly Report cannot be filed within the
prescribed time period because the Company requires additional time
for compilation and review to insure adequate disclosure of certain
information required to be included in the Form 10-Q.  The
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will be filed on or before
the 5th calendar day following the prescribed due date.

                    About Gopher Protocol

Gopher Protocol, Inc., formerly Forex International Trading Corp.,
is in the process of developing a real-time, heuristic-based,
mobile technology.  Upon development, the technology will consist
of a smart microchip, mobile application software and supporting
software that run on a server.  The Company applied this technology
into an electronic circuit, including a microchip that is within a
sticky patch package (the Patch).  The Patch can be affixed to any
object, mobile or static, which will enable the object to which it
is affixed to be tracked remotely.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss of $1.30 million on $120,000 of total revenues compared to
a net loss of $54,739 on $67,500 of total revenues for the nine
months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Gopher had $88,467 in total assets, $619,913
in total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of
$531,446.


GRAND VOLUTE: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral After Nov. 21
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge James W. Boyd of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Michigan, authorized Grand Volute Ballrooms, LLC to
continue using cash collateral after November 21, 2016, the date on
which the Debtor is required to file its Chapter 11 Plan.  

All the provisions of the Sept. 19, 2016 Order will continue to
apply and control in relation to the Debtor's continued use of cash
collateral.

Judge James W. Boyd directed the Debtor to pay $7,020 to Fifth
Third Bank, on or before the 15th day of each calendar month
beginning on December 15, 2016.

The final hearing on the Order will be held on December 20, 2016 at
1:30 p.m.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated November 22, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/7pWyhK


                         About Grand Volute

Grand Volute Ballrooms, LLC, based in Lowell, MI, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Mich. Case No. 16-04314) on August 19,
2016.  The petition was signed by Kent O. McKay, sole member.  The
case is assigned to Judge James W. Boyd.  The Debtor is represented
by James R. Oppenhuizen, Esq., at Oppenhuizen Law Firm, PLC.  The
Debtor disclosed $2.27 million total assets and $3.45 million total
liabilities.  

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


GRAND VOLUTE: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Through Jan. 5
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge James W. Boyd of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Michigan authorized Grand Volute Ballrooms, LLC, to
continue using cash collateral until 45 days after Nov. 21, 2016,
or Jan. 5, 2017.

The Debtor was directed to make monthly payments of $7,020 to Fifth
Third Bank, beginning on Dec. 15, 2016.  The Debtor was further
directed to provide an updated cash flow projection for the 45-day
period, within five days from the entry of the Court's Order.

All other provisions of the Court's Order, dated Sept. 19, 2016,
will continue to apply in relation to the Debtor's continued use of
cash collateral.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Nov. 21, 2016, is available at

http://bankrupt.com/misc/GrandVolute2016_1604314jwb_72.pdf

                About Grand Volute Ballrooms

Grand Volute Ballrooms, LLC, based in Lowell, MI, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Mich. Case No. 16-04314) on Aug. 19, 2016.
The petition was signed by Kent O. McKay, sole member.  Judge
James W. Boyd presides over the case.  James R. Oppenhuizen, Esq.,
at Oppenhuizen Law Firm, PLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel.  The
Debtor disclosed $2.27 million in assets and $3.45 million in
liabilities.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


GRANVILLE BRINKMAN: Wihbey Buying Tacoma Condo Unit for $270K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Granville Alan Brinkman and Robbin Rena Brinkman ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington to
authorize the sale of real property, a condominium located at 201
Broadway, Unit A, in Tacoma, Washington, with Tax Parcel Number
9005460010, to Jacqueline M. Wihbey for $270,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Dec. 14, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.  The
objection deadline is Dec. 7, 2016.

On May 20, 2016, the Court entered an order authorizing the Debtors
to employ Mark Foley and RE/MAX Metro as their real estate broker
with respect to listing the condo for sale.

On Oct. 19, 2016, the Court entered an order approving two
settlements with respect to the condo: Short Sale and Carve-Out
Agreement between the Debtors and the Estate of William Looney, and
Move-Out Agreement between the Debtors and Walter Sharp.

On Nov. 20, 2016, the Debtors received an offer of purchase of the
condo from the Purchaser in the form of a Condominium Purchase and
Sale Agreement ("PSA").  The Purchaser is a disinterested party,
and the sale price reflects an arm's-length transaction.

A copy of the PSA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Granville_Brinkman_131_Sales.pdf

Pursuant to the Short Sale and Carve-Out Agreement, the Move-Out
Agreement, and the PSA, the Debtors will pay these creditor and
costs from the sale proceeds:

    a. Secured creditor William Looney in the approximate amount of
$217,192;

    b. Real estate broker Mark Foley--RE/MAX Metro’s commission
of 6%;

    c. A $25,000 carve-out to Debtors pursuant to 11 USC Section
506(c), to be split with Walter Sharp;

    d. Title insurance fees;

    e. Past due and prorated property taxes;

    f. Real estate excise tax;

    g. Closing costs;

    h. Buyer credit for loan costs in the amount of $5,000; and

    i. Past-due HOA fees to be paid as agreed among Debtors, the
Estate of William Looney, and Walter Sharp.

In addition, because the sale may take place within 14 days after
entry of the order on the Motion, and because the Purchaser must
have assurance that her purchase is not subject to any appeal, the
Debtors request that the 14-day stay provided for in Rule 6004(h)
not apply to the order on the Motion.

The Debtors ask that the Court approve the sale of the real
property in the amount of $270,000, free and clear of liens,
claims, and encumbrances, and authorize payment to Debtors'
creditor and broker from the sale proceeds.

The Purchaser can be reached at:

          Jacqueline M. Wihbey
          Telephone: (503) 726-8198
          E-mail: jwihbey@gmail.com

Granville Alan Brinkman and Robbin Rena Brinkman filed a Chapter
11
petition (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 15-44496) on Sept. 28, 2015.


GREAT BASIN: Has 165.48M Outstanding Common Shares as of Nov. 18
----------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov. 15, 2016, certain holders of the Series F Convertible
Preferred Stock were issued shares of Great Basin Scientific,
Inc.'s common stock pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the United
States Securities Act of 1933, (as amended) in connection with the
mandatory conversion of the Preferred Stock under the terms of the
Certificate of Designations for the Preferred Stock.  In connection
with the mandatory conversions, the Company issued 12,800,000
shares of common stock upon the conversion of 256 shares of
Preferred Stock at a conversion price of $0.02 per share.

As previously disclosed, the Company mandatorily converted 2,098 of
the Preferred Stock into approximately 104.9 million shares of the
Company's common stock, at a conversion price of $0.02 per share.
Due to restrictions on beneficial ownership the Company has
converted 1,408 shares of Preferred Stock into 70,400,000 shares of
common stock pursuant to the mandatory conversion.  The remaining
690 shares of Preferred Stock are held in abeyance and remain to be
mandatorily converted for the issuance of 34,500,000 shares of
common stock.

The Company previously filed an 8-K on Nov. 14, 2016, and reported
152,683,055 shares of common stock outstanding therefore as of Nov.
18, 2016, there are 165,483,055 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding.

                       About Great Basin

Great Basin Scientific is a molecular diagnostic testing company
focused on the development and commercialization of its patented,
molecular diagnostic platform designed to test for infectious
disease, especially hospital-acquired infections.  The Company
believes that small to medium sized hospital laboratories, those
under 400 beds, are in need of simpler and more affordable
molecular diagnostic testing methods.  The Company markets a system
that combines both affordability and ease-of-use, when compared to
other commercially available molecular testing methods, which the
Company believes will accelerate the adoption of molecular testing
in small to medium sized hospitals.  The Company's system includes
an analyzer, which it provides for its customers' use without
charge in the United States, and a diagnostic cartridge, which the
Company sells to its customers.

Great Basin reported a net loss of $57.9 million in 2015 following
a net loss of $21.7 million in 2014.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Great Basin had $83.40 million in total
assets, $144.9 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $61.47 million.

Mantyla McReynolds, LLC, in Salt Lake City, Utah, issued a "going
concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the
Company has incurred substantial losses from operations causing
negative working capital and negative operating cash flows.  These
issues raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


GREYSTAR REAL: S&P Revises Outlook to Pos. & Affirms 'BB-' ICR
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings Services said it revised its outlook on Greystar
Real Estate Partners LLC to positive from stable and affirmed its
issuer credit rating at 'BB-'.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB-' senior secured debt
rating.  The recovery rating of '3' remains unchanged.  The '3'
recovery rating indicates S&P's expectation for meaningful recovery
(50%-70%; upper half of the range) of principal in the event of a
payment default.

"The revised outlook reflects the company's reduced leverage at
3.10x as measured by debt to EBITDA and that the firm may further
lower leverage to under 3.0x over the next 12 months," said S&P
Global Ratings credit analyst Gaurav Parikh.  The outlook also
incorporates the firm's favorable market position in multifamily
property management services and its sturdy profitability.
Greystar's market position in the fragmented, niche sector of
multifamily property management was further fortified by the
Riverstone acquisition.  According to the National Multifamily
Housing Council "2016 NMHC 50 Report," which ranks the top
apartment owners, managers, developers, and contractors in the
U.S., the approximate unit count of 414,000 for Greystar was about
2.5x greater than the next largest competitor, Lincoln Property Co.
The company's debt-to-adjusted EBITDA ratio for the quarter ending
September 2016 was 3.1x, compared to 3.7x at the same time last
year.  S&P expects the company will maintain leverage at the lower
end of the 3.0x-4.0x range.

Greystar primarily derives its revenues from a stable, recurring
source, property management services.  The property management
contracts generally provide a management fee between 2%-4% of gross
domestic revenues.  As of Sept. 30, 2016, the property management
revenues increased by 10.7% to $69.5 million while units under
management decreased to 414,000 from 426,000 units as the company
disposed of some of its units as a part of the Vero transaction.
In January 2016, Greystar contributed its interest for one of its
U.K. real estate ventures in exchange for 3.6% interest in a newly
created joint venture, Vero. Vero, which consolidated two of the
U.K.'s leading student accommodation brands, was formed to create a
leading student accommodations provider and owns a portfolio of
units across 59 properties.

S&P's positive outlook on Greystar reflects S&P's expectations that
the company will maintain its favorable market position in
multifamily property management services, sustained operating
profitability, and leverage below 3.5x over the next 12 months.
S&P's positive outlook also reflects our expectation of stable
market trends in multifamily housing during the next two to three
years and Greystar's ability to successfully compete in the
sector.

S&P could raise the rating over the next 12 months if it believes
that Greystar will operate longer term -- through the commercial
real estate cycle -- with lower leverage, specifically below 3.0x
debt to EBITDA on a sustained basis, and maintain its advantageous
market position in multifamily property management services.

S&P could revise the outlook to stable if the company's leverage,
as measured by debt to EBITDA, rises above 3.5x with no credible
plan for reduction.  S&P could lower the issuer credit rating, if
leverage increases above 4.0x on a persistent basis.  Additionally,
S&P may also lower the rating if Greystar's market position erodes
significantly or if substantial portion of the company's
construction and development loan guarantees jeopardizes the
company's liquidity and capital levels.


GULF CHEMICAL: Selling Miscellaneous Assets
-------------------------------------------
Bear Metallurgical Co. and Gulf Chemical & Metallurgical Corp. ask
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
to authorize sale of miscellaneous assets outside the ordinary
course of business.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Dec. 13, 2016 at 11:00 a.m.  The
objection deadline is Dec. 6, 2016.

On June 30, 2016, the Office of the United States Trustee for the
Western District of Pennsylvania appointed the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.  No request for the appointment of a
trustee or examiner has been made in the Chapter 11 cases.

On Sept. 13, 2016, the Court entered a final order authorizing the
Debtors to enter into a debtor-in-possession financing agreement
and obtain debtor-in-possession financing from Comilog Holding.

In late 2015 and early 2016, Rothschild Global Financial Advisory
was retained to explore transactions for the sale of Debtors'
businesses.  During that timeframe, Rothschild and the Debtors
engaged in a thorough and extensive prepetition marketing process.
Informed by that process, the Debtors concluded that it was in the
best interests of the Debtors and their creditors to sell their
assets through a chapter 11 process.

Therefore, on the Petition Date, the Debtors filed a motion
requesting, among other things, approval of bid procedures for the
auction of substantially all of the Debtors' assets.  The Court
granted the Debtors' motion and entered Procedures Order.  In
accordance with the Procedures Order, the Debtors held an auction
and, on Sept. 13, 2016, the Court entered an order authorizing Bear
to sell substantially all of its assets, which sale closed on Oct.
4, 2016.  The Debtors did not receive any qualified bids for the
purchase of Gulf's assets and therefore the auction did not go
forward as to Gulf.

After the auction, Gulf continued to market its assets for a
potential going concern sale.  However, to date, Gulf has not
received an acceptable offer and has determined that the best way
to maximize value for all parties in interest is to wind down
operations and idle its facility ("Idling Plan").  Specifically,
Gulf intends on continuing to operate for the next several months,
which will allow Gulf to process spent catalysts currently at
Gulf's facility or en route to Gulf's facility.  After extensive
analysis, Gulf and its professionals believe that the alternative
to the Idling Plan, an immediate liquidation, would provide less
value to Gulf's estate and would not allow Gulf to process the
hazardous waste currently at its facility in an environmentally
responsible manner.

Gulf has informed the Committee and Comilog about the Idling Plan.
Further, on Nov. 10, 2016, Gulf informed its employees and the
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality about the Idling Plan.

In the ordinary course of its business operations, Gulf has
accumulated and is currently in possession of the "Miscellaneous
Assets" that are not necessary for operations or that will become
unnecessary during or after completion of the Idling Plan.
Therefore, in an effort to maximize value for the estate, Gulf
requests authority to sell, among other things: (a) parts and other
consumables that are currently or become no longer needed to
operate, whether stored at Gulf’s facility or offsite, (b)
machinery, equipment, storage tanks, and other operational assets
after being taken out of service, (c) office furniture, fixtures,
and equipment, and (d) laboratory furniture, fixtures, and
equipment.

In connection with the sale of the Miscellaneous Assets, Gulf
requests that the Court enter an order approving these
Miscellaneous Assets Sale Procedures:

    a. Other than with respect to a De Minimis Assets Sale, if the
sale consideration from a purchaser of the Miscellaneous Asset(s)
does not exceed $250,000, on a per-transaction basis, and if the
sale is not to an insider, Gulf may sell the Miscellaneous Asset(s)
upon providing written "Notice," to: (i) the Office of the United
States Trustee for the Western District of Pennsylvania, (ii)
counsel for the Committee, (iii) counsel for Comilog, and (iv) all
known parties holding or asserting an Interest in the Miscellaneous
Asset(s) being sold and their respective counsel, if known ("Notice
Parties");

    b. The Notice will include, to the extent Gulf has such
information: (i) a description of the Miscellaneous Asset(s) to be
sold, (ii) the economic terms of sale, (iii) the identity of the
purchaser, and (iv) the identity of the party, if any, holding or
asserting an Interest in the Miscellaneous Asset(s) to be sold;

    c. The Notice Parties will have 5 business days from the
receipt of such notice (unless extended by agreement from Gulf) to
inform Gulf in writing that they object to the proposed sale
("Objection Deadline");

    d. If no written objection is received by the Objection
Deadline, Gulf may consummate the sale of the Miscellaneous
Asset(s) described in the Notice, without further notice to any
other party and without the need for a hearing, and such sale will
be deemed fully authorized by the Court;

    e. If a written objection to a proposed sale is timely received
by the Objection Deadline, Gulf will not proceed with the proposed
sale unless (i) the objection is withdrawn or otherwise resolved;
or (ii) the Court enters an order approving the proposed sale;

    f. All buyers will acquire the Miscellaneous Assets sold by
Gulf pursuant to these Miscellaneous Asset Sale Procedures on an
"as is, where is" basis without any representations or warranties
from Gulf as to the quality or fitness of such assets for either
their intended or any other purposes; provided, however, that
buyers will take title to the Miscellaneous Assets free and clear
of all Interests pursuant to section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code,
with all such Interests, if any, to attach to the proceeds of the
sale, with the same validity, force, and effect which they had
against such Miscellaneous Assets prior to the sale;

    g. Good faith purchasers of the Miscellaneous Assets will be
entitled to the protections of Section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy
Code;

    h. The absence of a timely objection to the sale of the
Miscellaneous Assets in accordance with the Miscellaneous Asset
Sale Procedures will be "consent" to such sale within the meaning
of section 363(f)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code; and

    i. On or before the 20th day of each month, Gulf will file a
report of sale with the Court that provides details of any sales of
Miscellaneous Assets during the previous calendar month, including
the information provided in the Notice and the actual closing date
of such sales.  The first report of sale shall be due on Feb. 20,
2017 for the period from the date of entry of an order granting the
Motion through Jan. 31, 2017.  In the event no sales of
Miscellaneous Assets occur during any calendar month,
Gulf will not be obligated to file a report of sale.

Gulf submits that the proposed Miscellaneous Asset Sale Procedures
do not apply to Gulf's sale of inventory, which Gulf will continue
to sell in the ordinary course of its business for the duration of
the Idling Plan.  Accordingly, Gulf asks that the Court grant the
relief requested.

Gulf further asks a waiver, to the extent applicable, of Local Rule
6004-1(a)-(c), as Gulf submits that the procedures set forth in
such subsections do not further the purpose of the relief sought in
the Motion.

               About Gulf Chemical & Metallurgical

Bear Metallurgical Co. is a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Gulf Chemical & Metallurgical Corporation.  They are
indirectly majority owned by Eramet, a mining and metallurgical
company headquartered in France.  They operate within Eramet's
manganese group of companies.

Bear Metallurgical Co. and Gulf Chemical & Metallurgical Corp.
filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Lead Case No. 16-22192)
on June 14, 2016.  The petitions were signed by Eric Caridroit,
chief executive officer. The cases are assigned to Judge Jeffery A.
Deller.

At the time of the filing, Bear Metallurgical estimated assets and
debt between $1 million and $10 million.  Gulf Chemical estimated
assets and debt between $100 million and $500 million.

The Debtors tapped McDonald Hopkins LLC and Cohen & Grigsby, P.C.,
as counsel; and Rothschild & CIE, as investment banker.

The Office of the United States Trustee appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors on June 30, 2016.  The Committee
retained Fox Rothschild LLP and Lowenstein Sandler LLP as counsel;
and Province, Inc. as financial advisor.

Comilog Holdings, Gulf's parent company and Bear's indirect parent
company, is represented by John M. Steiner, Esq. and Patrick W.
Carothers, Esq., at Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl, LLC.


GURKARN DIAMOND: Wants Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gurkarn Diamond Hotel Corporation asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Texas for authorization to use the cash
collateral of U.S. Bank NA and its servicer, CWCapital Asset
Management LLC, the Debtor's primary secured creditor.

The Debtor owns and operates a Quality Suites hotel in Midland,
Texas.

The Secured Lender claims a lien on, among other things, the
Debtor's room rents.  

The Debtor contends it can adequately protect the interests of the
Secured Lender by providing it with postpetition liens and a
priority claim in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case.

The Debtor tells the Court that the cash collateral will be used to
continue the Debtor's ongoing operations.  The Debtor intends to
reorganize its affairs and needs to continue to operate in order to
pay its ongoing expenses, generate additional income and to propose
a plan of reorganization in the case.

The Debtor's proposed one-month Budget, for the period Nov. 15,
2016 to Dec. 15, 2016, provides for total expenses in the amount of
$79,839.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Nov. 21, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/GurkarnDiamond2016_1670183rbk_7.pdf

                About Gurkarn Diamond Hotel Corporation

Gurkarn Diamond Hotel Corporation filed a chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 16-70183) on Nov. 14, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Satinder S. Gill, partner member.  The
Debtor is represented by Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq., at Joyce W.
Lindauer Attorney, PLLC.  The case is assigned to Judge Ronald B.
King.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million to
$10 million at the time of the filing.


HAMPSHIRE GROUP: Files Chapter 11 to Facilitate Orderly Wind-Down
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hampshire Group, Limited, on Nov. 25, 2016, disclosed that the
Company and two of its U.S. subsidiaries have filed voluntary
petitions under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in
Wilmington, Delaware in order to facilitate the orderly wind-down
of their business operations.

The Company engaged in a thorough analysis of its businesses and
assets.  Ultimately, the Company was unable to attract a financing
source to provide adequate liquidity to fund the Company's ongoing
strategic turnaround initiatives.  As a result, the Company's Board
of Directors determined that an orderly liquidation and wind-down
of its licensed businesses would be the best way to maximize value
for the benefit of the Company's creditors and stakeholders.
Regrettably, the litigation efforts pursued by one unsecured
creditor since July of this year have compelled the Company and
certain of its affiliates to seek protection under Chapter 11 in
order to continue to pursue, and ultimately complete, the wind-down
process without disruption.

This difficult decision follows a comprehensive strategic and
financial review of the businesses.  The Board of Directors has
determined that the actions being undertaken represent the best
path forward for the Company and its stakeholders.  While the
Company is disappointed with this outcome, the prospect of the
Company being unable to continue to effectuate a controlled
wind-down of its licensed businesses out-of-court were severely and
negatively jeopardized by the actions taken by a single unsecured
creditor.  The Company ultimately determined that this is the best
course of action, under the circumstances.

In conjunction with its Chapter 11 filings, the Company has
received a commitment from its senior secured creditor, Salus
Capital Partners LLC, to allow the Company to utilize cash
collateral in accordance with a mutually agreed upon budget that is
designed to afford the Company the requisite runway to consummate
the wind-down effort that has been diligently pursued over the past
several months.  It is the Company's reasonable expectation that
the continuation of the liquidation effort in the context of
Chapter 11 will maximize recoveries for all creditors in an orderly
fashion.

                      About Hampshire Group

New York-based Hampshire Group, Limited (OTC Markets: HAMP) is a
provider of fashion apparel across a broad range of product
categories, channels of distribution and price points.  As a
holding company, the Company operates through its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Hampshire Brands, Inc. and Hampshire International,
LLC.  The Company completed the sale of Rio Garment S.A. effective
April 10, 2015.

The Company incurred a net loss of $28.8 million in 2014 following
a net loss of $16.04 million in 2013.

As of Sept. 26, 2015, Hampshire had $37.9 million in total assets,
$44.8 million in total liabilities and a $6.93 million total
stockholders' deficit.


HIGH-TOP HOLDINGS: James G. Baker Named Chapter 11 Trustee
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge W. Homer Drake of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Georgia entered an order approving the appointment of
James G. Baker as Chapter 11 Trustee for High-Top Holdings, Inc.

Guy G. Gebhardt, the Acting United States Trustee for Region 21,
notified the Court that he appointed Mr. Baker as Chapter 11
Trustee for the Debtor.

The appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee is made pursuant to the
November 10, 2016 Order directing the United States Trustee to
appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee for the Debtor.  The U.S. Trustee
noted that the bond of the Chapter 11 Trustee will initially be set
at US$20,000. The bond may require adjustment as the Trustee
collects and liquidates assets of the estate. The Chapter 11
Trustee is directed to inform the United States Trustee when
changes to the bond amount are required or made.

The counsel for the U.S. Trustee consulted with J. Nevin Smith,
Esq., Lisa McVicker Wolgast, Esq., William G. Johnston, Esq., R.
Brian Wooldridge, Esq., David C. Whitridge, Esq., Michael J.
Marshall, Esq., and Paris Wynn, Esq. regarding the appointment of
the Chapter 11 Trustee.

Mr. Baker assured the Court that he does not hold or represent any
interest adverse (i) to the estate of the Debtor; or (ii) to any
class of creditors or equity security holders, by reason of any
direct or indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest
in, the Debtor, or for any other reason.

James G. Baker can be reached at:

         James G. Baker, Esq.
         305 North Greenwood Street
         LaGrange, GA 30240
         Phone: (706) 884-3059
         Fax: (706) 882-4062
         E-mail: jgbaker@jgbpc.com

               About High-Top Holdings

High-Top Holdings, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.
Ga. Case No. 16-10022-whd ) on January 4, 2016, and is represented
by J. Nevin Smith, Esq., in Carrollton, Georgia.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had $500,000 to $1 million in
estimated assets and $1 million to $10 million in estimated
liabilities.

The petition was signed by Japeth Jackson, president.

A list of the Debtor's five largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb16-10022.pdf


HONGLI CLEAN: Receives Additional Nasdaq Notice on Delayed 10-Q
---------------------------------------------------------------
Hongli Clean Energy Technologies Corp. announced, as previously
reported, on
Oct. 12, 2016, the Company received a Determination letter from The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (the "Nasdaq") notifying the Company of the
Nasdaq Staff's determination that  the Company's failure to timely
file its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2016 could serve as an additional basis for delisting from The
Nasdaq Stock Market pursuant to Listing Rule 5250(c)(1).  In
addition, on November 16, 2016, the Company received an additional
deficiency notice for the late filing of its periodic report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, which could
also serve as an additional basis for delisting pursuant to Listing
Rule 5250(c)(1).  The Company had previously been notified that it
did not comply with the $1.00 bid price requirement for continued
listing, as set forth in Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the "Minimum Bid
Price Rule").  In response, on October 27, 2016, the Company
effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split.  As of the date of this
filing, the Company's bid price has remained above $1.00 per share
for 19 consecutive trading days.

Based on the foregoing, the Company requested a hearing before a
Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel (the "Panel").  Following the
oral hearing before the Panel on November 17, 2016, on November 21,
2016, the Company received written notification that the Panel had
determined that the Company has regained compliance with the
Minimum Bid Price Rule and has granted the Company's request for
continued listing pending the filing of its delinquent reports and
any necessary restatements with the Securities and Exchange
Commission through January 31, 2017.  Notwithstanding the
foregoing, there can be no assurance that the Company will regain
compliance by January 31, 2017, or that the Panel will grant a
further extension in the event the Company does not timely regain
compliance.

          About Hongli Clean Energy Technologies Corp.

Previously known as SinoCoking Coal and Coke Chemical Industries,
Inc., Hongli Clean Energy Technologies Corp. ("Hongli" or the
"Company")(Nasdaq: CETC) is a Florida corporation and an emerging
producer of clean energy products located in Pingdingshan City,
Henan Province, China.  The Company has historically been a
vertically-integrated coal and coke processor of basic and
value-added coal products for steel manufacturers, power
generators, and various industrial users.  The Company has been
producing metallurgical coke since 2002, and acts as a key supplier
to regional steel producers in central China.  The Company also
produces and supplies thermal coal to its customers in central
China.  The Company currently owns its assets and conducts its
operations through its subsidiaries, Top Favour Limited and
PingdingshanHongyuan Energy Science and Technology Development Co.,
Ltd., and its affiliated companies, Henan Province
PingdingshanHongli Coal & Coke Co., Ltd., Baofeng Coking Factory,
BaofengHongchang Coal Co., Ltd., BaofengHongguang Environment
Protection Electricity Generating Co., Ltd., Zhonghong Energy
Investment Company, Henan Hongyuan Coal Seam Gas Engineering
Technology Co., Ltd., BaofengShuangri Coal Mining Co., Ltd., and
BaofengXingsheng Coal Mining Co., Ltd.


HRG GROUP: Strategic Alternatives Plan No Impact on Fitch's B IDR
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings views the Nov. 17, 2016 announcements by HRG Group
Inc. as neutral to the company's 'B' Long-Term Issuer Default
Rating (IDR) and Negative Rating Outlook. HRG announced that its
President and CEO, Omar M. Asali, intends to step down in the
second half of fiscal 2017 and that the company is evaluating
strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value.

HRG's Board of Directors has initiated a process to explore
strategic alternatives available to HRG, including a merger, sale
or other business combination. These actions follow HRG's prior
announcement that the expected sale of portfolio company Fidelity &
Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc. (FGL) to Anbang Insurance Group Co.,
Ltd. has been delayed to Feb. 8, 2017 from Nov. 7, 2016. As part of
the regulatory process concerning the FGL sale, FGL must receive
outstanding regulatory approvals from China, Iowa and New York.

Fitch revised HRG's Rating Outlook to Negative on May 9, 2016,
reflecting longer-term strategic uncertainty given that HRG would
effectively be operating as a single-investment, pass-through
structure at least for a period of time post the FGL sale.
Yesterday's announcements by HRG of the President/CEO's expected
resignation and the board's intention to explore strategic
alternatives confirm Fitch's uncertainty with respect to HRG's
long-term viability.

Fitch calculates that upstream dividends from HRG's subsidiaries
relative to holding company interest expenses remain below 1.0x.
That said, this ratio could improve should HRG use proceeds from
the FGL sale to repay holding company debt, which would improve
balance sheet stability as HRG evaluates strategic alternatives.

Negative rating actions may result from a sale of HRG to a
lower-rated entity or sustained uncertainty with respect to HRG's
strategic direction, organizational structure or ownership
framework. Under a scenario where HRG is unable to identify
suitable strategic alternatives, ratings could be negatively
influenced by a sustained reduction in interest coverage below
1.0x; deployment of the company's current and future cash for
equity-oriented means or into investments that are of a highly
speculative nature and/or exhibit uncertain dividend capacity; or a
deterioration in operating performance at Spectrum Brands, Inc.
(HRG's largest investment representing a 57.9% controlling
interest; Long-Term IDR 'BB'/Outlook Stable) that results in a
material decline in its value, dividend capacity and/or credit
ratings.

Ratings could be positively influenced by a sale of HRG to a more
highly-rated entity or merger with another entity, the result of
which is a more diversified entity with strong leverage and
interest coverage metrics. Under a scenario where HRG sells its
remaining investments, retires outstanding debt and effectively
winds down, Fitch would expect to withdraw HRG's IDR and classify
outstanding debt ratings as paid in full.

Fitch currently rates HRG Group, Inc. as follows:

   -- Long-Term IDR 'B', Outlook Negative;

   -- Senior unsecured notes 'B/RR4';

   -- Senior secured notes 'BB-/RR2'.


III EXPLORATION II: Selling Eastern Uintah Basin Property for $3.5M
-------------------------------------------------------------------
III Exploration II LP, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Utah to authorize the sale of substantially all of its
eastern Uintah basin property to Crescent Point Energy U.S. Corp.
or its designee for $3,500,000, subject to overbid.

The Debtor essentially is a real property holding company, which
holds a variety of working interests in approximately 900 oil and
gas leases in Utah, Colorado and North Dakota ("Property") and
generates the majority of its revenue through sales of crude oil
and natural gas extracted from the Property by operators.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor obtained financing from
certain lenders ("First Lien Lenders") pursuant to a senior secured
credit facility evidenced by that certain Credit Agreement dated
Feb. 19, 2013 among the Debtor, as borrower, Wilmington Trust,
National Association ("First Lien Agent"), as successor
administrative agent to KeyBank National Association, and the First
Lien Lenders (as amended, "First Lien Facility").  The Debtor also
obtained a second priority secured financing from KeyBank National
Association, acting as administrative agent for certain lenders
("Second Lien Lenders").  The obligations owing to the First Lien
Lenders and Second Lien Lenders are secured by a pledge of
substantially all of the assets of the Debtor.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor explored a range of possible
restructuring options, including a refinancing, recapitalization or
a sale of some or all of the Debtor's assets outside of bankruptcy.
In connection with such process, the Debtor engaged Tudor
Pickering Holt & Co. ("TPH"), an investment bank focused on the
energy market.  The Debtor was unable to identify a workable
solution to improve its liquidity, solve the ongoing events of
default under the First Lien Facility and continue its current
operations.  As such, because the Debtor's existing capital
structure was unsustainable, the Debtor filed for chapter 11
protection and quickly sought debtor in possession financing.  The
financing that was available, however, was provided on the
condition that a substantial sale transaction be completed within
an expedited time-frame.

Thus, the Debtor commenced the chapter 11 case to effectuate a sale
of substantially all of its assets on a going concern basis.  The
Debtor, in consultation with TPH and the First Lien Lenders,
determined that given its leveraged financial position, its
diminishing revenue stream, and its conclusions about the valuation
of the Debtor's business and assets, the most effective way to
preserve the Debtor's going concern value for the benefit of all
constituencies would be an expedited sale of the Property following
a thorough marketing process.

On Aug. 11, 2016, the Debtor filed the Motion for Order Approving
Bid Procedures for Sale of Substantially All of the Debtor's
Assets.

On Aug. 23, 2016, the Court entered Bid Procedures Order approving
the "Bid Procedures" by which the Debtor would identify potential
bidders for the Property, market the Property to the potential
bidders, elicit offers from the potential bidders, and qualify
offers from potential bidders ("Qualified Bid").  Potential bidders
that submitted a Qualified Bid would become "Qualified Bidders" and
be eligible to bid at the Auction for the Property.

The Debtor, in consultation with TPH and approval of the First Lien
Agent, extended the sale process on two separate occasions in an
effort to maximize value and to accommodate Potential Bidders.  

The sale process proceeded in accordance with this timeline:

   a. Virtual Data Room Opened: Aug. 24, 2016

   b. Stalking Horse Agreement Deadline: Oct. 17, 2016

   c. Bid Deadline: Oct. 28, 2016

   d. Deadline for Debtor to notify Bidders if their Bids have been
determined to be Qualified Bids: Nov. 1, 2016

   e. Auction: Nov. 4, 2016

   f. Deadline to File Motion to Approve Sale and Assume Contract:
Nov. 22, 2016

Following approval of the Bid Procedures, the Debtor robustly
sought motivated and financially able bidders for the Property.
The Debtor engaged TPH as financial advisor and investment banker
to, among other things, facilitate a thorough solicitation and
marketing process for the Property, which includes approximately
70,286 net operated acres and approximately 28,858 net non-operated
acres in the Uinta, Williston and Raton basins.  Through TPH, the
Debtor publicized the sale and marketed the Property broadly in the
Debtor's industry and in the general marketplace.

The sale timeline provided the Debtor with sufficient time to
solicit (and/or re-solicit) prospective purchases in advance of the
proposed bid deadline, while respecting the necessity to consummate
a sale as quickly as possible to maximize the value obtained for
the Property for the benefit of the Debtor's estate.

Pursuant the discretion afforded to the Debtor in the Bid
Procedures and in consultation with TPH, the Debtor divided the
Property into four separate lots: (1) the Western Uintah Basin
Property, (2) the Eastern Uintah Basin Property, (3) the North
Dakota Property, and (4) the Colorado Raton Property.

Bidding closed on Oct. 28, 2016, and the Debtor received 5 total
bids for various lots of Property.  Qualified Bidders were
permitted to participate in the Auction scheduled for Nov. 4, 2016.
Each Qualified Bidder submitted with their Required Bid Materials
a list of the executory contracts and unexpired leases of the
Debtor that it wished to receive through assumption and assignment
under Bankruptcy Code section 365.

One business day prior to the Auction, the Debtor provided each
Qualified Bidder with a copy of the Qualified Bid submitted by
Crescent Point, which the Debtor believed represented the then
highest or otherwise best offer ("Starting Bid").  The Starting Bid
for the non-operated Eastern Uintah Basin Property, submitted by
Crescent Point, was $3,500,000.  The Debtor received no Subsequent
Bid from a Qualified Bidder.  Therefore, the Debtor determined,
after consultation with the First Lien Lenders, that the highest
and otherwise best offer was submitted by Crescent Point in the
amount of $3,500,000 ("Successful Bid").  The Debtor and Crescent
Point entered into Purchase and Sale Agreement ("PSA").

In connection with the sale of the Eastern Uintah Basin Property,
the Debtor seeks authority to assume and assign to Crescent Point
certain unexpired leases and executory contracts ("Assigned
Contracts").  Absent an objection by a nondebtor party to each
Assigned Contract, the Debtor asks that the Cure Amounts listed
become final and binding on the nondebtor parties.

A copy of the near-final draft of the PSA and the Assigned
Contracts attached to the Motion is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/III_Exploration_173_Sales.pdf

The Debtor is not currently aware of any Interests in the Property
other than the liens of the First Lien Lenders, Second Lien Lenders
and the alleged liens of Questar Energy Co. ("QEP").  The First
Lien Lenders and Second Lien Lenders consent to the Sale.
Therefore, the Eastern Uintah Basin Property may be sold free and
clear of any Interests asserted by the First Lien Lenders and
Second Lien Lenders.

The Debtor has sound business reasons for the proposed sale of the
Eastern Uintah Basin Property to Crescent Point.  The Debtor
believes that the value of its business and the Property would
decline rapidly if it were to run out of cash and be required to
completely cease business operations.  In order to realize the best
value for its businesses and the Property in recognition of the
time-sensitivity and potentially decreasing value of the assets,
the Debtor was required to act promptly.

In order to preserve that value, the Debtor sought and obtained
approval of the Bid Procedures, and, having complied with Bid
Procedures (as amended), asks the approval of the Court to finalize
the sale of the Eastern Uintah Basin Property to Crescent Point in
order to realize the best value for its business and the Eastern
Uintah Basin Property.

The Debtor asks that, under the circumstances of the case, time is
of the essence, and the Court should waive the 14-day stay
otherwise imposed by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004(h).

In particular, the Debtor has significant ongoing expenses that
will be reduced substantially after the sale closes.  Additionally,
the proposed sale depends on the continued consent and cooperation
from the First Lien Lenders.  They have required that the sale be
finalized promptly and a distribution be made on account thereof
without delay, and, in any event, that the Sale close and a
distribution be made by no later than the end of December 2016.

The Purchaser:

          CRESCENT POINT ENERGY U.S. CORP.
          555 17th Street, Suite 1800
          Denver, CO 80202
          Attn: Anthony Baldwin
          Manager Land & Business Development
          Telephone: (720) 880-3610
          E-mail: abaldwin@crescentpointenergy.com

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Lamont C. Larsen, Esq.
          DAVIS GRAHAM & STUBBS, LLP
          1550 17th Street, Suite 500
          Denver, CO 80202
          Telephone: (303) 892-7473
          E-mail: Lamont.Larsen@dgslaw.com

                   About III Exploration II

III Exploration II LP and its general partner, Petroglyph Energy,
Inc., are headquartered in Boise, Idaho.  The Debtor is engaged in
the exploration and production of oil and natural gas deposits,
primarily in the Uinta Basin in Utah.  The Debtor also has an
interest in approximately 42,100 undeveloped acres in the Raton
Basin located in Colorado, and participates in joint ventures with
respect to properties in the Williston Basin in North Dakota.

III Exploration filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Utah Case
No. 16-26471) on July 26, 2016.  The petition was signed by
Paul R. Powell, president.  The Debtor estimated assets at $50
million to $100 million and debt at $100 million to $500 million.

The case is assigned to Judge R. Kimball Mosier.  

The Debtor tapped George Hofmann, Esq., Steven C. Strong, Esq.,
and
Adam H. Reiser, Esq., at Cohne Kinghorn, P.C., to serve as its
general counsel; and A. John Davis, Esq., at Holland & Hart LLP to
serve as special counsel.  Tudor Pickering Holt & Co. has been
tapped as investment banker.  Donlin Recano & Company Inc. acts as
claims and noticing agent.


III EXPLORATION II: Selling Western Uintah Basin Property for $52M
------------------------------------------------------------------
III Exploration II LP, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Utah to authorize the sale of substantially all of its
western Uintah basin property to Ute Energy Exploration and
Marketing, LLC, or its designee for $52,000,000, subject to
overbid.

The Debtor essentially is a real property holding company, which
holds a variety of working interests in approximately 900 oil and
gas leases in Utah, Colorado, and North Dakota ("Property") and
generates the majority of its revenue through sales of crude oil
and natural gas extracted from the Property by operators.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor obtained financing from
certain lenders ("First Lien Lenders") pursuant to a senior secured
credit facility evidenced by that certain Credit Agreement dated
Feb. 19, 2013 among the Debtor, as borrower, Wilmington Trust,
National Association ("First Lien Agent"), as successor
administrative agent to KeyBank National Association, and the First
Lien Lenders (as amended, "First Lien Facility").  The Debtor also
obtained a second priority secured financing from KeyBank National
Association, acting as administrative agent for certain lenders
("Second Lien Lenders").  The obligations owing to the First Lien
Lenders and Second Lien Lenders are secured by a pledge of
substantially all of the assets of the Debtor.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor explored a range of possible
restructuring options, including a refinancing, recapitalization or
a sale of some or all of the Debtor's assets outside of bankruptcy.
In connection with such process, the Debtor engaged Tudor
Pickering Holt & Co. ("TPH"), an investment bank focused on the
energy market.  The Debtor was unable to identify a workable
solution to improve its liquidity, solve the ongoing events of
default under the First Lien Facility and continue its current
operations.  As such, because the Debtor's existing capital
structure was unsustainable, the Debtor filed for chapter 11
protection and quickly sought debtor in possession financing.  The
financing that was available, however, was provided on the
condition that a substantial sale transaction be completed within
an expedited time-frame.

Thus, the Debtor commenced the chapter 11 case to effectuate a sale
of substantially all of its assets on a going concern basis.  The
Debtor, in consultation with TPH and the First Lien Lenders,
determined that given its leveraged financial position, its
diminishing revenue stream, and its conclusions about the valuation
of the Debtor's business and assets, the most effective way to
preserve the Debtor's going concern value for the benefit of all
constituencies would be an expedited sale of the Property following
a thorough marketing process.

On Aug. 11, 2016, the Debtor filed the Motion for Order Approving
Bid Procedures for Sale of Substantially All of the Debtor's
Assets.

On Aug. 23, 2016, the Court entered Bid Procedures Order approving
the "Bid Procedures" by which the Debtor would identify potential
bidders for the Property, market the Property to the potential
bidders, elicit offers from the potential bidders, and qualify
offers from potential bidders ("Qualified Bid").  Potential bidders
that submitted a Qualified Bid would become "Qualified Bidders" and
be eligible to bid at the Auction for the Property.

The Debtor, in consultation with TPH and approval of the First Lien
Agent, extended the sale process on two separate occasions in an
effort to maximize value and to accommodate Potential Bidders.  

The sale process proceeded in accordance with this timeline:

    a. Virtual Data Room Opened: Aug. 24, 2016

    b. Stalking Horse Agreement Deadline: Oct. 17, 2016

    c. Bid Deadline: Oct. 28, 2016

    d. Deadline for Debtor to notify bidders if their Bids have
been determined to be qualified bids: Nov. 1, 2016

    e. Auction: Nov. 4, 2016

    f. Deadline to File Motion to Approve Sale and Assume Contract:
Nov. 22, 2016

Following approval of the Bid Procedures, the Debtor robustly
sought motivated and financially able bidders for the Property.
The Debtor engaged TPH as financial advisor and investment banker
to, among other things, facilitate a thorough solicitation and
marketing process for the Property, which includes approximately
70,286 net operated acres and approximately 28,858 net non-operated
acres in the Uinta, Williston and Raton basins.  Through TPH, the
Debtor publicized the sale and marketed the Property broadly in the
Debtor's industry and in the general marketplace.

The sale timeline provided the Debtor with sufficient time to
solicit (and/or re-solicit) prospective purchases in advance of the
proposed bid deadline, while respecting the necessity to consummate
a sale as quickly as possible to maximize the value obtained for
the Property for the benefit of the Debtor's estate.

Pursuant the discretion afforded to the Debtor in the Bid
Procedures and in consultation with TPH, the Debtor divided the
Property into four separate lots: (1) the Western Uintah Basin
Property, (2) the Eastern Uintah Basin Property, (3) the North
Dakota Property, and (4) the Colorado Raton Property.

Bidding closed on Oct. 28, 2016, and the Debtor received 5 total
bids for various lots of Property.  Qualified Bidders were
permitted to participate in the Auction scheduled for Nov. 4, 2016.
Each Qualified Bidder submitted with their Required Bid Materials
a list of the executory contracts and unexpired leases of the
Debtor that it wished to receive through assumption and assignment
under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

One business day prior to the Auction, the Debtor provided each
Qualified Bidder with a copy of the Qualified Bid submitted by
Crescent Point Energy U.S. Corp., which the Debtor believed
represented the then highest or otherwise best offer ("Starting
Bid").  The Starting Bid for the operated Western Uintah Basin
Property, submitted by Crescent Point, was $41,500,000.  The
bidding proceeded between Ute Energy and Crescent Point until
Crescent Point made its final bid at $51,500,000 for the Western
Uintah Basin Property.  Ute Energy then made its final bid of
$52,000,000 for the Western Uintah Basin Property.

No higher bids were made, and the Debtor, after consultation with
the First Lien Agent, declared the $52,000,000 bid of Ute Energy as
the "Successful Bid" for the Western Uinta Basin assets, subject to
the parties working out some ancillary issues in a mutually
acceptable Purchase and Sale Agreement regarding those assets, and
declared the $51,500,000 bid of Crescent Point as the binding
backup bid for the Western Uintah Basin Property pursuant to the
Bid Procedures.

In connection with the sale of the Western Uintah Basin Property,
the Debtor seeks authority to assume and assign to Ute Energy
certain unexpired leases and executory contracts ("Assigned
Contracts").  Absent an objection by a nondebtor party to each
Assigned Contract, the Debtor asks that the Cure Amounts listed
become final and binding on the nondebtor parties.  The Debtor asks
the Court to authorize the Debtor to assume and assign contracts as
will be set forth in the  Purchase and Sale Agreement ("PSA")
between the Debtor and Ute Energy.

A copy of the PSA and the Assigned Contracts attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/III_Exploration_172_Sales.pdf

The Debtor is not currently aware of any Interests in the Western
Uintah Basin Property other than the liens of the First Lien
Lenders and Second Lien Lenders.  The First Lien Lenders and Second
Lien Lenders consent to the Sale.  Therefore, the Western Uintah
Basin Property may be sold free and clear of any Interests asserted
by the First Lien Lenders and Second Lien Lenders.

The Debtor has sound business reasons for the proposed sale of the
Western Uintah Basin Property to Ute Energy.  The Debtor believes
that the value of its business and the Property would decline
rapidly if it were to run out of cash and be required to completely
cease business operations.  In order to realize the best value for
its businesses and the Property in recognition of the
time-sensitivity and potentially decreasing value of the assets,
the Debtor was required to act promptly.

In order to preserve that value, the Debtor sought and obtained
approval of the Bid Procedures, and, having complied with Bid
Procedures (as amended), asks the Court to finalize the sale of the
Western Uintah Basin Property to Ute Energy in order to realize the
best value for its business and the Western Uintah Basin Property.


The Debtor respectfully asks that, under the circumstances of the
case, time is of the essence, and the Court should waive the 14-day
stay otherwise imposed by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004(h).

In particular, the Debtor has significant ongoing expenses that
will be reduced substantially after the sale closes.  Additionally,
the proposed sale depends on the continued consent and cooperation
from the First Lien Lenders.  They have required that the sale be
finalized promptly and a distribution be made on account thereof
without delay, and, in any event, that the Sale close and a
distribution be made by no later than the end of December 2016.

                   About III Exploration II

III Exploration II LP and its general partner, Petroglyph Energy,
Inc., are headquartered in Boise, Idaho.  The Debtor is engaged in
the exploration and production of oil and natural gas deposits,
primarily in the Uinta Basin in Utah.  The Debtor also has an
interest in approximately 42,100 undeveloped acres in the Raton
Basin located in Colorado, and participates in joint ventures with
respect to properties in the Williston Basin in North Dakota.

III Exploration filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Utah Case
No. 16-26471) on July 26, 2016.  The petition was signed by
Paul R. Powell, president. The Debtor estimated assets at $50
million to $100 million and debt at $100 million to $500 million.

The case is assigned to Judge R. Kimball Mosier.  

The Debtor tapped George Hofmann, Esq., Steven C. Strong, Esq.,
and
Adam H. Reiser, Esq., at Cohne Kinghorn, P.C., to serve as its
general counsel; and A. John Davis, Esq., at Holland & Hart LLP to
serve as special counsel.  Tudor Pickering Holt & Co. has been
tapped as investment banker.  Donlin Recano & Company Inc. acts as
claims and noticing agent.


ILYA GOLUB: Real Estate Tax Claim To Be Fully Paid in 52Mos. at 12%
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ilya and Simona Golub filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois,  Eastern Division, a fourth
disclosure statement accompanying an amended plan of reorganization
to, among other things, make a pro rata distribution to Holders of
Allowed Unsecured Claims within 60 days after the Effective Date of
the Plan.

Class 7 - Real Estate Tax Claim of the Lake County Collector in the
amount of 25,609.05 will be paid in full over 52 months at an
interest rate of 12% annually in equal monthly installments of
$635.00.

Holders of Allowed Class 8 Unsecured Claims will be paid their pro
rata portion of $35,000 in Cash in a single distribution made
within sixty days of the Effective Date of the Plan. Holders of
Allowed Class 8 Claims will receive a distribution of approximately
6%. The Cash used to pay Class 8 Claims will come from the
Debtors’ otherwise exempt retirement account.

The Debtors intend to implement the Plan by taking the following
steps: making a withdrawal from one or more retirement account(s)
to obtain the Cash to make a single distribution to Holders of
Class 8 Claims; making monthly payments to holders of Secured
Claims; paying expenses of administering the Plan; and employing
and compensating professionals.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb16-10968-47.pdf

The Debtors are represented by:

     William J. Factor, Esq.
     Ariane Holtschlag, Esq.
     FACTORLAW
     105 W. Madison, Suite 1500
     Chicago, IL 60602
     Tel: (312) 878-4830
     Fax: (847) 574-8233
     Email: wfactor@wfactorlaw.com
            aholtschlag@wfactorlaw.com

             About The Golubs

Ilya Golub and Simona Golub, a married couple residing in Lake
County, work as IT director and pharmacist, respectively. The
Debtors sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 16-10968) on March 30, 2016. The Debtors
are represented by William J. Factor, Esq. and Ariane Holtschlag,
Esq., at FactorLaw as counsel.


INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS: Incurs $7.5 Million Net Loss in 3rd Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------------
Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc., filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $7.49 million on $3.31 million of net revenue for the
three months ended Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $4.89
million on $2.50 million of net revenue for the same period during
the prior year.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss of $14.61 million on $9.96 million of net revenue compared
to a net loss of $15.74 million on $6.87 million of net revenue for
the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Interpace Diagnostics had $45.96 million in
total assets, $47.44 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $1.47 million.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/CGVCXc

                  About Interpace Diagnostics

Headquartered in Parsippany, New Jersey, Interpace Diagnostics
Group, Inc., is focused on developing and commercializing molecular
diagnostic tests principally focused on early detection of high
potential progressors to cancer and leveraging the latest
technology and personalized medicine for patient diagnosis and
management.  The Company currently has four commercialized
molecular tests: PancraGen, a pancreatic cyst molecular test that
can aid in pancreatic cyst diagnosis and pancreatic cancer risk
assessment utilizing our proprietary PathFinder platform; ThyGenX,
which assesses thyroid nodules for risk of malignancy, ThyraMIR,
which assesses thyroid nodules risk of malignancy utilizing a
proprietary gene expression assay.

Interpace reported a net loss of $11.35 million in 2015, following
a net loss of $16.07 million in 2014.

BDO USA, LLP, in Woodbridge, New Jersey, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from continuing operations that raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.


INVERSORA ELECTRICA: U.S. Court Recognizes Argentine Proceeding
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Martin Glenn of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York granted the Chapter 15 Petition for
Recognition of a Foreign Proceeding and the Foreign
Representative's Motion for Order Granting Final Relief in Aid of a
Foreign Proceeding, filed by Jaime Javier Barba in his capacity as
the authorized foreign representative for Inversora Electrica de
Buenos Aires S.A. (IEBA).

On December 23, 2015, IEBA commenced a restructuring of its
obligations pursuant to the acuerdo preventivo extrajudicial (APE)
under the provisions of Title II, Chapter VII of the Argentine
Bankruptcy Law No. 24,522 before the National Commercial No. 1
Court sitting in the City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.  On September
8, 2016, the Argentine Court entered the Homologation Order
approving the APE.  On September 26, 2016, IEBA consummated the
transactions approved in the APE with respect to the consenting
noteholders by making certain cash payments and issuing and
delivering new notes.  Holders of IEBA's Series C Notes and Series
D Notes who did not participate in the solicitation were to receive
a combination of cash and exchange notes.

IEBA's assets in the United States primarily consist of property
held in accounts located in New York.  These accounts include (i)
an escrow account in New York at Bank of New York Mellon
Corporation containing unclaimed Series C Notes and Series D Notes;
and (ii) cash in a bank account at a New York branch of Barclays
Bank PLC.  Additionally, the indenture governing the Notes is
governed by New York law and includes a New York forum selection
clause.  BNY Mellon will not exchange the Notes it holds in escrow
for cash and exchange notes without an order from a U.S. court,
making a Chapter 15 proceeding necessary to carry out the terms of
the APE.

On October 12, 2016, IEBA filed its Chapter 15 Petition and the
Motion with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York.

Barba sought an order:

     (1) granting the Petition and recognizing IEBA's
         restructuring proceeding as a foreign main proceeding
         under section 1517 of the Bankruptcy Code;

     (2) recognizing and enforcing the Argentine court's
         Homologation Order;

     (3) permanently enjoining all parties from commencing or
         taking any action in the United States to obtain          
        
         possession of, exercise control over, or assert claims
         against IEBA or its property; and

     (4) granting such other relief as may be just and proper.

The Petition and the Motion were unopposed.

Judge Glenn found that IEBA has established that it has sufficient
assets in the United States to form the basis for jurisdiction here
and that that the case may properly be maintained under chapter 15.
The judge found that the case was properly commenced when it was
filed by the Barba attaching proof of the foreign proceeding and an
English translation.

Judge Glenn held that recognition of the case is consistent with
chapter 15's stated purpose to fairly and efficiently administer
cross-border insolvencies and "protect[] the interests of all
creditors, and other interested entities, including the debtor."
The judge found that Barba has shown that exercising the Court's
discretion to enforce the Homologation Order and APE is appropriate
and that enforcing the Homologation Order and APE promotes comity
with Argentine courts, the centralization of disputes involving the
debtor, and the orderly and fair administration of the debtor's
assets.

Judge Glenn concluded that the requested relief is consistent with
section 1521(a) -- it "will give clear direction and authority
under United State law to the U.S. Intermediaries to carry out the
requirements of the IEBA APE" and will benefit the debtor and its
estate.

A full-text copy of Judge Glenn's November 23, 2016 memorandum
opinion is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb16-12854-14.pdf

The Foreign Representative is represented by:

          Fredric Sosnick, Esq.
          Sara Coelho, Esq.
          SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
          599 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10022-6069
          Tel: (212)848-8000
          Fax: (212)848-7179
          Email: fsosnick@shearman.com
                 sara.coelho@shearman.com

The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation is represented by:

          James Gadsden, Esq.
          CARTER LEDYARD & MILBURN LLP
          2 Wall Street
          New York, NY 10005
          Tel: (212)732-3200
          Fax: (212)732-3232
          Email: gadsden@clm.com

                    About Inversora Electrica

Inversora Electrica de Buenos Aires S.A., a distributor and
transporter of electricity based in the  City of Buenos Aires,
Argentina, filed a Chapter 15 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
16-12854) on  October 12, 2016.  The Hon. Martin Glenn presides
over the case.   Fredric Sosnick, Esq. at Shearman & Sterling LLP
served as bankruptcy counsel.  In its petition, the Debtor
estimated $124 million in assets and $34.3 million in liabilities
at the end of the second quarter of 2016.


IOWA FERTILIZER: Fitch Cuts $1.185BB Disaster Area Bonds to B-
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded the rating on the $1.185 billion
($1.156 billion outstanding) Midwestern Disaster Area Revenue Bonds
(the bonds) issued by the Iowa Finance Authority on behalf of Iowa
Fertilizer Company LLC (IFCo) to 'B-' from 'B+'. Fitch has placed
the rating on Rating Watch Negative.

RATING RATIONALE

The downgrade reflects that only a limited margin of safety remains
for repayment of the bonds as currently structured. Failure to
achieve final completion has placed significant pressure on the
ability to make upcoming mandatory debt payments. Project sponsor
OCI N.V. (OCI) has put forth a consent solicitation and tender
exchange offer to resolve outstanding obstructions to project
completion and relieve the near-term payment default risk. If the
consent and tender exchange is not completed, OCI has committed to
funding remaining development costs and the Dec. 1, 2016 payment,
providing similar relief of near-term payment default risk.
Additionally, the project could face ramp-up issues and is
vulnerable to a volatile and potentially weak product pricing
environment.

The Rating Watch Negative reflects the potential for further
negative rating action due to any of the following factors: failure
to relieve near-term financial pressure, further material
completion delays, early operational performance below
expectations, or weakening in near-term product prices.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Construction Significantly Delayed and Over Budget: The
engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) agreement is a
fixed-price contract, fully-wrapped by an experienced contractor,
but ongoing change orders led to a substantial increase in EPC
project costs. The project fully exhausted its contingency and
issued an additional $100 million of combined senior debt and
sponsor equity in June 2015, and additional funding will be
required to complete the facility. Without bondholder consent to a
settlement agreement, contractor claims would remain outstanding,
indicating that final costs could rise further.

Limited Liquidity: IFCo has not yet begun generating operational
cash flow. As such, IFCo funded the mandatory June 2016 payment
with cash from the debt service reserve, which was replaced by a
letter of credit (LOC) to fully refund the reserve balance. This
reserve balance is available to meet future obligations, providing
some liquidity cushion. Additionally, if IFCo's tender exchange is
not completed, sponsor OCI has committed to cash funding the
December 2016 payment, thereby ensuring sufficient liquidity to
meet debt obligations through the June 2017 payment. When the
project achieves operation, relatively high equity distribution
triggers will support debt repayment and replenishment of reserves
during potential periods of low operating cash flow. Operating and
major maintenance reserves will help shield the project during the
operational phase.

Nitrogen Market Price Exposure: IFCo will sell its nitrogen
products to farmers, distributers, wholesalers, cooperatives, and
blenders at market prices. The project's main products have
historically exhibited considerable price volatility. Pricing has
fallen close to 10-year lows in the past quarter though there has
been some recovery very recently.

Natural Gas Price Risk: The project will procure its natural gas
feedstock via an existing pipeline at prices linked to Henry Hub.
IFCo has entered into natural gas call swaptions for the first
seven years of the project to moderate the risk of a reversal in
gas pricing trends. In addition, the project will fund a feedstock
reserve and can enter into further call swaptions to help mitigate
price risk during the non-hedged period.

Unproven Operating Profile: Non-feedstock O&M and maintenance cost
projections have increased significantly from original projections,
and the project may require several years of operations to
establish a stable cost profile. The use of commercially proven
technologies and a plant design with oversized capacity could help
mitigate operating performance risk.

Vulnerable Financial Profile: In the absence of a bond exchange,
IFCo may require a draw on the DSR to meet the June 1, 2017 payment
depending on the commencement of commercial operations and
near-term product pricing. Over the long-term, Fitch's analysis
suggests that IFCo's ability to meet ongoing mandatory debt
payments is vulnerable to deterioration of operating margins. Given
the recent decline of and ongoing uncertainty surrounding nitrogen
product prices, Fitch's financial scenarios do not assume any
improvement in operating margins over the debt term. If the plant
begins commercial operations by February 2017 (a two-month delay
from current sponsor expectations) and operates at a production
capacity and non-feedstock cost profile in line with sponsor
expectations, as is the assumption in Fitch's base case, debt
service coverage at current product prices would average 1.19x
through debt maturity.

Peer Analysis: IFCo's peer group includes merchant project
financings in which product sales are susceptible to the inherent
volatility of commodity markets. Merchant projects that have
achieved ratings in the 'BB' category have demonstrated some
combination of long-term feedstock price certainty, materially low
leverage, structural enhancements, or a proven, quasi-monopolistic
competitive advantage. Merchant projects in the 'B' rating category
or lower typically face significant technology implementation or
construction risks, are exposed to price and volume risk, and
operate in a business environment with highly volatile margins.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Negative: Negative rating action could be warranted due to any of
the following factors: failure to gain relief of near-term
financial pressure, further material construction delays, early
operational performance below expectations, or weakening in
near-term product prices.

Negative: A fundamental shift in the supply-demand balance or
global producer cost curve that results in materially lower
operating margins expected to persist over a long period.

Negative: Inability to effectively manage operating costs or
failure to reach and sustain projected capacity and utilization
rates.

Positive: Resolution of the Rating Watch and further positive
rating action is contingent on completion of the project and
commencement of operations, resolution of all outstanding
contractor claims, and a fully cash or LOC-funded debt service
reserve.

CREDIT UPDATE

Construction of the plant continues to trail behind schedule and
final costs remain uncertain given ongoing unresolved contractor
claims for costs outside of the scope of the EPC contract. In its
third quarter 2016 Construction Monitoring Report, independent
engineer (IE) Nexant reported that ammonia mechanical completion,
which as recently as mid-2016 was anticipated in September, has
been pushed back to a target of November. This would indicate the
start of ammonia production in December and downstream production
in the first quarter of 2017. However, the IE expressed concern
that the risk of further weather delays is increasing as winter
approaches. The schedule is considered aggressive and requires all
activities to proceed without any unforeseen problems.

Once operational, IFCo's operating margins are dependent on
favorable market pricing for nitrogen products. The pricing of
nitrogen products is correlated to the price of feedstock, which
may be oil, coal, or natural gas depending on the region and
producer. In recent years, the substantial declines in oil and
natural gas prices have driven nitrogen prices to levels
approaching 10-year lows. These pricing trends have diverged
significantly from market consultant forecasts that formed the
basis for cash flow projections for the original financing. The
market consultant provided an updated price deck in late October
2016 with a price curve indicating that the pricing will improve
dramatically from the current environment, pending a significant
rebound in energy prices, which Fitch views as optimistic.

PERFORMANCE UPDATE

IFCo's financial profile is under pressure due to ongoing costs to
reach completion and the project's mandatory semi-annual payments
of debt service on its bonds, repayment of the construction loan
for the National Bank of Abu Dhabi (NBAD), and scheduled hedging
premiums. There is also uncertainty surrounding the final costs
that may be incurred due to ongoing negotiations between OCI and
contractor OEC regarding delay liquidated damages owed by OEC and
additional price and time claims made by OEC against the project.
Over $70 million of subcontractor liens remain outstanding.

In an effort to resolve outstanding obstructions to project
completion and relieve the near-term payment default risk, sponsor
OCI has put forth a consent solicitation and tender exchange offer
on the near-term sinking fund payments. Bondholder consent to a
settlement agreement and various project agreement amendments would
resolve contractor claims and provide additional resources to
ensure project completion. The bond exchange would significantly
reduce mandatory obligations through the December 2017 payment and
cash fund or guarantee the remaining interest payments over the
next three periods. Additionally, if the consent and exchange is
not completed, OCI has committed to cash funding the December 2016
payment, thereby ensuring sufficient liquidity to meet debt
obligations through the June 2017 payment. Further, OCI has
committed to funding remaining development costs through
provisional acceptance of the project, providing similar relief of
near-term risks as in the consent solicitation and exchange offer.

FITCH CASES

Fitch's base and rating cases both begin with the expectation that
commercial operation will be further delayed to a start date of
February 2017 for ammonia production and March for downstream
production. These cases also utilize the same set of market pricing
assumptions. In order to appreciate the risk of uncertain future
nitrogen pricing, Fitch's cases assume that pricing remains flat at
recent low levels for the entire debt term. Meanwhile, feedstock
prices gradually rise over time (essentially at an inflationary
rate), thereby holding operating margins flat (or declining). Under
the base case, debt service coverage at current product prices
would average 1.19x through debt maturity.

Fitch's rating case also layers on a downside scenario in which
production capacity is 2.5% lower than expectation and
non-feedstock O&M (including major maintenance) costs are 10%
higher than expected. This scenario would put increased pressure on
the financial profile and suggests that IFCo may face periods where
debt service would fall below breakeven levels and be reliant on
reserves to avoid payment default.

In accordance with Fitch's policies, the issuer appealed and
provided additional information to Fitch that resulted in a rating
action that is different than the original rating committee
outcome.


IPS CORP: S&P Assigns 'B' CCR & Rates $310MM 1st-Lien Loan 'B'
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it assigned its 'B' corporate credit rating
to Compton, Calif.-based specialty adhesives and plumbing products
producer IPS Corp.  The outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P assigned its 'B' issue-level rating to the
company's proposed $310 million first-lien term loan due 2023.  The
recovery rating is '3', indicating S&P's expectation of meaningful
(50% to 70%; at the upper end of the range) recovery in the event
of a payment default.  S&P also assigned its 'CCC+' issue-level
rating to the company's proposed $110 million second-lien term loan
due 2024.  The recovery rating is '6', indicating S&P's expectation
of negligible (0% to 10%) recovery in the event of a payment
default.  The credit facility is unrated.

The debt will be held by the company's subsidiaries and
co-borrowers IPS Structural Adhesives Holdings Inc. and IPS
Intermediate Holdings Corp.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that IPS Corp. will
maintain adjusted debt to EBITDA between 6x and 6.5x and FFO to
debt between 7% and 9% over the next 12 months," said S&P Global
Ratings credit analyst Michael Maggi.  "In our view, these measures
are supported by continued growth in residential and nonresidential
construction, as well as repair and remodeling spending in both the
U.S. and abroad.  We also expect IPS to continue to increase
margins through acquisition-related synergies, cost- and
operational-improvements, and increased pricing."

S&P could lower its ratings on IPS if operating results came in
worse than expected due to weak end-market demand led primarily by
a slowdown in residential and nonresidential construction
(especially in the U.S.), or the company experienced integration
missteps from recent and future acquisitions.  This would likely
result in weaker-than-expected margins and leverage trending above
7x, possibly constraining liquidity.  S&P could also take a
negative rating action if the company took on a more aggressive
financial policy, incurring additional debt to fund acquisitions or
dividends, such that adjusted debt to EBITDA rose above 7x on a
sustained basis.

S&P views an upgrade over the next 12 months as unlikely given the
company's financial sponsor ownership, S&P's expectations for
adjusted leverage to remain above 5x, and S&P's assessment that the
company's business risk profile will not change absent a meaningful
expansion in size and scale.  However, if the company were to
materially expand and diversify its revenue base and end market
exposure, while maintaining its margins, S&P could consider an
upgrade.  Separately, S&P could also take a positive rating action
if IPS' adjusted leverage was sustained below 5x for a prolonged
period, along with a commitment from Nautic Partners to maintain
leverage below this level.


J.G. NASCON: Associated Paving Buying Milling Machine for $190K
---------------------------------------------------------------
J.G. Nascon, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania to authorize the sale of 2012 Bomag BM
1200 Milling Machine (Serial No. 821836351001) to Associated Paving
Contractors, Inc., for $190,000.

The Debtor is a heavy and highway construction property located in
Eddystone, Pennsylvania, providing full-service site contracting to
the tri-state region.  As of the Filing Date, the Debtor has
approximately 25 employees.  In July 2012, the Debtor purchased the
Milling Machine.

Prior to the Filing Date, M&T Bank ("Lender") made various loans to
the Debtor ("JG Nascon Loans"), including to finance the purchase
of the Milling Machine.

The Lender claims a first position, blanket lien on all of the
Debtor's assets, tangible and intangible, including the Milling
Machine, pursuant to these loan documents:

    a. The Line of Credit – On June 26, 2013, the Fourth A&R Note
was amended and restated in its entirety by that certain Amended
and Restated Revolving Demand Note in the original principal amount
of $3,350,000 dated June 26, 2013, which was subsequently amended
through Jan. 15, 2014.

    b. The 2012 Term Loan – On July 27, 2012, the Lender made a
term loan to the Debtor in the original principal amount of
$300,000 evidenced by a loan agreement and term note of the same
date.

    c. The 2013 Term Loan – On Oct. 1, 2013, the Lender made a
term loan to the Defendant in the original principal amount of
$750,000 evidenced by a loan agreement and term note of the same
date.

In September 2014, the Lender confessed judgment against the Debtor
in the amount of $4,321,207 in the Court of Common Pleas of
Delaware County, Pennsylvania.  That judgment was subsequently
opened and subject to litigation as of the Filing Date.

As of the Filing Date, the Debtor owned, and continues to own, the
Milling Machine.

Through continued efforts of the Debtor, the Debtor obtained a
"Purchase Offer" for the sale the Milling Machine to Associated
Paving for $190,000.  The closing on the Purchase Offer and
subsequent agreement of sale will occur within 5 days after the
Bankruptcy Court approves the same.

The Purchase Offer contemplates the sale of the Milling Machine to
the Buyer for the purchase price.  The Buyer is unrelated to the
Debtor or any of the Debtor's affiliates, officers, or agents.  The
Debtor intends to negotiate and finalize an agreement of sale prior
to the Sale Hearing requested and submit the same for approval.

The Debtor and Lender have agreed to a distribution of the sale
proceeds.  The sale proceeds will partially pay-down of the
Lender's secured debt.

The Lender has advised the Debtor that the Lender will consent to
the sale of the Milling Machine provided that the Lender receives,
upon the closing of the sale, the greater of $175,000 or 90% of the
final purchase price for the Milling Machine ("Sale Payment").

The Sale Payment will be applied as follows: (i) $13,750,
representing three (3) adequate protection payments of $4,584,
which will be applied immediately, and which will result in the
Debtor not having to make adequate protection payment in November
2016, December 2016 or January 2017 ("Specified Adequate Protection
Payments"); and (ii) the total  amount of the Sale Payment less
$13,750 to reduce the amount of the Lender's secured debt, which
will be treated as a credit, to the amount that will be due to
Lender under an agreed upon plan of reorganization.

In the event that the sale of the Milling Machine to Buyer is not
approved or does not close, nothing in the Motion or any Order
entered in connection with the Motion will alter or relieve Debtor
of its obligation to make the Specified Adequate Protection
Payments, in accordance with the terms of any cash collateral order
entered by the Court.

The Debtor avers that, with the sale of the Milling Machine, as set
forth in the Purchase Offer, the Debtor will benefit the estate by
paying down the outstanding secured claim of the Lender and
providing for additional monies to the estate.

The Debtor asks the Court to approve the sale of the Milling
Machine in all respects, free and clear of any and all liens,
claims, encumbrances and interests in the Milling Machine.

The Debtor requests expedited treatment in connection with the
Motion because it requires the immediate sale of the Milling
Machine for the benefit of the estate.  Accordingly, the Debtor
asks that a hearing on the Motion be held at the convenience of the
Court but no later than Dec. 2, 2016.  

J.G. Nascon, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Pa.
Case No. 15-18704) on Dec. 4, 2015, in Philadelphia.  The Debtor
tapped Albert A. Ciardi, III, Esq., and Jennifer E. Cranston, Esq.,
at Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, P.C., as attorneys.  The Debtor estimated
$1 million to $10 million in assets and debt.


J.G. NASCON: Calvin Group Buying Paver for $225K
------------------------------------------------
J.G. Nascon, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania to authorize the sale of Roadtec RP 195
Rubber Track Asphalt Paver w/ Light Package, Reversin Augers and
Sonic Grade & Slope Control, S/N 276 ("Paver"), to Calvin Group,
Inc., for $225,000.

The Debtor is a heavy and highway construction property located in
Eddystone, Pennsylvania, providing full-service site contracting to
the tri-state region.  As of the Filing Date, the Debtor has
approximately 25 employees.

On July 17, 2013, the Debtor entered into an equipment finance
agreement with Signature Financial, LLC with respect to Paver.

On March 21,2016, the Debtor and Signature Financial entered into a
Stipulation and Consent Order whereby the parties agreed to set the
value of the Paver at a sum of $145,000 ("Paver Value") and the
Debtor will make 96 monthly payments to Signature Financial in the
principal payment of $1,500 a month plus interest.  Pursuant to the
Stipulation, the Debtor has paid Signature Financial a total of
$14,957 ("Stipulation Payments").

Through continued efforts of the Debtor, the Debtor obtained a
purchase offer for the sale the Paver to the Buyer for $225,00.
The Purchase Offer contemplates the sale of the Paver to the Buyer
for the purchase price.  The Buyer is unrelated to the Debtor or
any of the Debtor's affiliates, officers, or agents.

As of the Filing Date, the Debtor owned, and continues to own, the
Paver.  The Debtor has leased the Paver to the Buyer for $32,500
pending the final purchase and court approval.  The lease proceeds
will reduce the purchase price.

The closing on the purchase offer and subsequent agreement of sale
will occur within 5 days after the Bankruptcy Court approves the
same.

The Debtor proposes to pay Signature Financial at closing a total
of $130,043, which represents the remainder of the Paver Value
minus the Stipulation Payments out of the proceeds of the sale.
The remainder of the proceeds will be utilized by the Debtor in its
plan of reorganization.

The Debtor avers that, with the sale of the Paver, as set forth in
the purchase offer, the Debtor will benefit the estate by paying
off the secured claim of Signature Financial and providing for
additional monies to the estate.

Accordingly, the Debtor asks the Court to approve the sale of the
Paver to the Buyer free and clear of all liens, claims,
encumbrances, and interests.

J.G. Nascon, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Pa.
Case No. 15-18704) on Dec. 4, 2015, in Philadelphia.  The Debtor
tapped Albert A. Ciardi, III, Esq., and Jennifer E. Cranston,
Esq.,
at Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, P.C., as attorneys.  The Debtor
estimated
$1 million to $10 million in assets and debt.


JOHN M. SCALI SR: Unsecureds to Get 20% Over a 24-Month Period
--------------------------------------------------------------
John M. Scali, Sr.,filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois a disclosure statement accompanying
his plan of reorganization, which the Debtor believes represents an
opportunity for the holders of Allowed Claims to receive
substantially more than such claimants would receive as much or
more than such claimants would receive in a forced liquidation.

The plan has one category of Administrative Claims, no Tax Claims
and thirteen classes of creditors, classes 1 through 13.

Class 1 secured claims are held by Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. They
will continue to be paid monthly under the terms of the Note and
Mortgage between the Debtor and Wells Fargo.

Class 7 general unsecured claims are held by Capital One Visa
($330.68), Laner Muchin, Ltd ($13,150); People Gas ($248); and
Wells Fargo Visa ($4,432). Class 7 claimants will be paid 20% over
a period of 24 months, with payments beginning on Effective Date.
Payments to this Class of general unsecured claims will be made on
a quarterly basis. Class 7 Claims are impaired under the Plan.

Distributions under the Plan will be made from the Debtor's income
from Grand & Pulaski Citgo, Inc, social security, Debtor's 401(k)
distributions from the City of Chicago and cash available in the
Debtor's checking account.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb16-05072-105.pdf

John M. Scali, Sr., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill.
Case No. 16-05072) on Feb. 17, 2016, and is represented by Scott R.
Clar, Esq., and Matthew P. Welch, Esq., at Crane, Heyman, Simon,
Welch & Clar, in Chicago, Illinois.


JOSEPH D. ROMANIELLO: SBA to be Paid in Full Over 5-Year Period
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph D. Romaniello filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut a third amended disclosure statement
accompanying its third amended plan of reorganization.

Class 3, General Unsecured Claim 0 Third Party Payor, consists of
First County Bank which has a fully  secured mortgage on 20
Lafayette St., in Stamford, Connecticut owned by Romaniello
Industries in the approximate amount of $988,000 as of June 8,
2016.  The Bank is fully secured, but on the real estate owned by
Romaniello Industries, not the Debtor.  The Debtor owns 100% of
Romaniello Industries and is a guarantor of all obligations due to
the Bank. As such, the Debtor has separately classified the Bank as
unsecured creditor as it is vis-a-vis the Debtor.

The allowed claim of the Bank will be paid in accordance to the
current monthly payment prior to default over 5 years, which
payment will commence on the Effective Date. As of the Effective
Date, each monthly payment will be in the amount of $7,486, which
amount may be modified pursuant to the terms of the note and which
amount includes an escrow for the real property tax payments.

The Bank further will have the right to require that future monthly
payments include a payment for escrowed property insurance. The
Bank will retain its lien on 20 Lafayette St., Stamford,
Connecticut ("Lafayette Property") to full extent, validity and
priority such lien had as of the Petition Date to secure all
payments due by Debtor to the Bank.

Class 4, General Unsecured Claim - Third Party Payor, consists of
the Small Business Administration which has a fully secured
mortgage in the approximate amount of $575,000 as of July 1, 2016.
The Debtor owns 100% of Romaniello Industries and is a guarantor of
all obligations due to the SBA. As such, the Debtor has separately
classified the Bank as unsecured creditor as it is vis-a-vis the
Debtor.

This Class will be paid by a related third party as follows: SBA
will be paid in accordance with the current monthly payments prior
to default over a 5-year period which payments will commence on the
Effective Date. The SBA will be paid $25,000 from proceeds on hand
in addition to the monthly payment. The SBA will retain its lien on
Lafayette Street to the same extent, validity and priority such
lien had as the Petition Date to secure the payment as set forth.
At the end of or prior to said 5-year period, the Lafayette
Property will be sold or refinanced to satisfy the obligation in
full. Taxes and insurance will be paid as they become due. This
claim is impaired.

Class 5, General Unsecured Claim, consists of general unsecured
claims in the total amount of $20,803 (Rocky Genovese - $20,000,
CL&P - $374 and Yankee Gas - $429). The Debtor will pay all allowed
unsecured claims in full with 60 days of the Effective Date of
Confirmation. The creditors will receive interest at the United
States District Court judgment rate which is fixed on the Effective
Date.

The payments required under the Plan will be made from the Debtor's
income, cash on hand and with respect to Lafayette Property, the
leasing of the property to an unrelated third party for one-third
of the space and from the Debtor's related corporations which
proceeds will be enough generated by the Debtor to make the
payments in accordance with the treatment of each of the secured
creditors.

The Lafayette Property which is encumbered by First County Bank and
an SBA loan is divided into two sections which square footage is
roughly equivalent to two-thirds and one-third. The Debtor will
lease the property located in the one-third section for
approximately $3,000 to $3,500 per month. The Debtor has several
interested parties and should be entering into a commitment to
lease on Sept. 1, 2016.

Romaniello agrees, as a contractually bound party to the Plan, to
fund the amount of any shortfalls to First County Bank and the SBA
within 30 days of the payment due date in question provided that
the shortfall, if any, will not exceed 1 month's payment,
Romaniello will fund the shortfalls our of personal funds.

Thereafter, the remaining proceeds necessary to service the first
and second mortgage will be paid from rental income obtained from
East Coast Towing and Lafayette Auto Group. The Debtor indicates
that he has the ability to pay the ongoing $8,000 per month from
his business operations in order to service the indebtedness. In
the event of a rental shortfall during the term of the Plan, the
Debtor will provide cash payments sufficient to cover any such
shortfall and maintain the payments contemplated in the Plan.

The payments to be made to Wells Fargo for the first mortgage on
457 Pepper Ridge Rd., Stamford, Connecticut will be made as they
have been throughout on a current basis from income generated by
the Debtor and his wife.

The payments to be made to Wells Fargo on 15 Taff Ave., Stamford,
Connecticut, will be made as they have been throughout on a current
basis from income generated by the property. Arrearages will be
made up on or before the first anniversary of the Effective Date.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb14-51862-212.pdf

                   About Joseph D. Romaniello

Joseph D. Romaniello is involved in the auto industry as a towing
and auto body repair shop - two distinct businesses, one East Coast
Towing and the other Lafayette Auto Group.  Joseph D. Romaniello
filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 14-51862) on
Dec. 9, 2014.


KDS GROUP: Seeks Authority to Use Comerica Bank Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------------
KDS Group, PLLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Texas for authorization to use the cash collateral of
Comerica Bank on an interim basis.

The Debtor relates that its business consists of the ownership and
operation of three dental offices, and that it has an immediate
need to use the cash collateral in order to continue and maintain
the operations of its business.  The Debtor further relates that
the entire chance of it reorganizing depends on its ability to use
cash collateral so that it can continue operations of the company
while effectuating a plan of reorganization.

The Debtor seeks to use the cash collateral of Comerica Bank to
make the payroll and continue operations as set forth in its
proposed Budget.  The Debtor proposes to use $54,689 for operating
expenses, as reflected in its budget for the month beginning
November 2016.

Comerica Bank asserts a lien on the accounts receivable of the
Debtor.  The Debtor proposes to provide Comerica with replacement
liens pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 552.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated November 22, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/PSufMj

A full-text copy of the proposed Budget, dated November 22, 2016,
is available at https://is.gd/7YwItO

KDS Group, PLLC is represented by:

           Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
           Eric A. Liepins, P.C.
           12770 Coit Road,  Suite 1100
           Dallas, TX 75251
           Telephone: (972) 991-5591
           Telecopier: (972) 991-5788


                           About KDS Group PLLC

KDS Group PLLC filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case
No. 16-42101), on November 17, 2016.  The Debtor is represented by
Eric A. Liepins, Esq. at Eric A. Liepins, P.C.


KOPH INC: Court Allows Cash Collateral Use Through Jan. 12
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jack B. Schmetterer authorized Koph, Inc., to use First
Community Financial Bank's cash collateral through January 12,
2017.

First Community Financial Bank was granted valid, perfected and
enforceable post-petition replacement liens on all proceeds of
existing cash collateral, and all new collateral, to the same
extent that it had perfected liens prepetition.

The Debtor was directed to make monthly adequate protection
payments to First Community Financial Bank in the amount of $600.

The hearing on the Debtor's continued use of cash collateral is
scheduled on Jan. 10, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Nov. 21, 2016, is available at

http://bankrupt.com/misc/KophInc2016_1636244_13.pdf

                         About Koph, Inc.

Koph, Inc., is a corporation that operates a restaurant known as
Katie O'Connor's Pint House and Eatery at 13717 S. Route 30 in
Plainfield, Illinois.

Koph, Inc., filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.
16-36244) on Nov. 14, 2016.  The Debtor is represented by  David P.
Lloyd, Esq., at David P. Lloyd, Ltd.



L&M TRANSPORTATION: Seeks Use of $42,271 Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------
L&M Transportation LLC seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to use cash collateral
in the amount of $42,271 that is currently held by Compton Unified
School District.

The Debtor is applying for a cash collateral order so that Compton
School will release the $42,271 check to the Debtor.  

The Debtor needs a total of $37,615 from the cash collateral to pay
its expenses during the month of November 2016, which includes:

     (a) Payroll, totaling $27,656;

     (b) Car Payments of approximately $6959; and

     (c) estimated gas of $3,000.  

The Debtor proposes to pay BlueVine with the remaining amount of
$4,656 as adequate protection, once Compton School releases the
funds to the Debtor.

The Debtor has entered into various factoring/invoice purchase
agreement with BlueVine.  Under the Invoice Purchase Agreement,
invoices are submitted to BlueVine and the vendor, and BlueVine
would advance the payment on the whole invoices to the Debtor, then
the vendor would pay BlueVine.

The Debtor relates that the amount of $42,271 represents the
invoices it submitted to Compton School for the month of October
2016, but which were not submitted to  BlueVine, and BlueVine had
never paid the Debtor.  The Debtor further relates that the last
invoices submitted to BlueVine concerning Compton School was made
on July 19, 2016, for which the Debtor received te payment on Sept.
13, 2016 in the amount of $30,000.

The Debtor tells the Court that it has been negotiating on
BlueVine's contract, but BlueVine has shutdown the Debtor's money
supply by demanding that all vendors provide payment to them and
not to the Debtor, which lead to the Debtor's bankruptcy filing.
The Debtor further tells that Compton School has refused to turn
over the $42,271 check, without a Court order, based upon
BlueVine's demand made after the Petition Date, which is in
violation of the automatic stay.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated November 22, 2016,
is available at https://is.gd/PGOmVL

                            About L&M Transportation

L&M Transportation LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-23772) on October 18,
2016.  The petition was signed by Marvell Tell, chief executive
officer.  The Debtor is represented by RoseAnn Frazee, Esq. at
Frazee Law Group.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated
assets at $0 $500,000 and liabilities at $500,001 to $1 million.


LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------------------
An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Lakewood Development Company
LLC as of Nov. 23, according to a court docket.

Lakewood Development Company LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. w.D.MO. Case No. 16-50425) on October 17, 2016.
Hon. Cynthia A. Norton presides over the case.  Krigel & Krigel, PC
represents the Debtor as counsel.  The Debtor disclosed total
assets of $4.20 million and total liabilities of $2.42 million.
The petition was signed by Jerry Alan Sigtist, managing partner.


LAURA GENS: Unsecureds To Get 100% Over 60 Months at 0.64%
----------------------------------------------------------
Unsecured creditors will receive full payment of their claims under
a plan proposed by Laura Gens to exit Chapter 11 protection.

The restructuring plan proposes to pay Class 4 general unsecured
creditors 100% of their allowed claims, plus interest at 0.64% per
annum, in 60 equal monthly installments.  

Specifically, the plan will set aside $64,053 to pay in full the
allowed claims of general unsecured creditors who will receive a
monthly payment of $1,067.

Payments will start a month after the effective date of the
restructuring plan, according to the disclosure statement filed on
Nov. 8 with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
California.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at
https://is.gd/P00mXT

The Debtor is represented by:

     Lars T. Fuller, Esq.
     The Fuller Law Firm
     60 North Keeble Avenue
     San Jose, CA 95126
     Phone: (408) 465-4472
     Local: (408) 295-5595
     Fax: (408) 295-9852
     Email: Fullerlawfirmecf@aol.com

                        About Laura Gens

Laura A. Gens sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 15-53562) on November 11, 2015.


LESLIE ROGER SAUNDERS: Plan Confirmation Hearing on Dec. 21
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Arthur B. Federman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Missouri has conditionally approved the
Debtor's disclosure statement and Chapter 11 plan filed on Nov. 13,
2016.

The hearing on final approval of the Disclosure Statement and for
the hearing on confirmation of the Plan will be held on Dec. 21,
2016, at 9:30 a.m.

Dec. 16, 2016, is the deadline for filing with the Court objections
to the Disclosure Statement or plan confirmation; and submitting to
the Debtor's counsel for the plan proponent ballots accepting or
rejecting the Plan.

Leslie Roger Saunders, II, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for
the District of Missouri a disclosure statement referring to the
Debtor's plan of reorganization.

Class 5 Unsecured Non-Priority Claim is impaired under the Plan.
Class 5 presently consists of the Internal Revenue Service,
Missouri Department of Revenue and Jackson County.  The claims
total about $10,703.28.  The Debtor will file objections to the
MDOR and IRS claims based on the Debtor's non-filed 2011 income
tax
returns.  The Debtor did not have sufficient income to file in
2011.   

To the extent that extent it is determined that there are
potential
other general unsecured claims, the Debtor will have 60 days after
confirmation of the Plan within which to object to any claim filed
in the case.  The Debtor will have an additional 30 days to object
to any claim filed pursuant to the recovery of any avoidable
transfer action.  Any claim not objected to within the periods
will
be deemed accepted.

The Plan will be funded with Debtor's wages and income from
employment.  The Debtor has provided projected his individual
monthly operating reports for the last six months to show his
ability to fund the Plan.   

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/mowb15-42416-11.pdf

Leslie Roger Saunders, II, is a married individual who is employed
as a car salesman in Lee's Summit, Missouri.  The Debtor filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No.
15-42416), and is represented by Susan Bratcher, Esq., in Kansas
City, Missouri.


LINDEN & ASSOCIATES: Unsecureds To Recoup 20% Under Plan
--------------------------------------------------------
Linden & Associates PC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada a disclosure statement referring to the Debtor's
plan of reorganization.

Class 3 General Unsecured Claims -- estimated at $113,528.07 -- are
impaired under the Plan.  Holders of Class 3 claims will be paid on
or before the Effective Date.  The holders are expected to recover
20%.

On the Effective Date, David E. Linden, M.D., will retain his
equity interests.  The Reorganized Debtor Operating Agreement will
prohibit the issuance of non-voting securities or any other
securities inconsistent with 11 U.S.C. Section 1123(a)(6).  The
issuance of securities pursuant to the Plan will be exempt from any
securities laws registration to the fullest extent permitted by
Section 1145 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.  

A hearing on the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement will be held
on Jan. 11, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. Pacific Time.

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb16-12697-74.pdf

The Plan was filed by the Debtor's counsel:

     Ryan J. Works, Esq.
     Amanda M. Perach, Esq.
     MCDONALD CARANO WILSON LLP
     2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
     Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
     Tel: (702) 873-4100
     Fax: (702) 873-9966
     E-mail: rworks@mcdonaldcarano.com
             aperach@mcdonaldcarano.com

Linden & Associates, PC, is a professional corporation that
provides psychiatric health care to patients for a fee, billed
primarily through insurance (Medicare and Medicaid).   David E.
Linden, M.D., is the only physician on staff with the Debtor and
provides one-on-one care to each patient.  In providing psychiatric
services, Dr. Linden, among other things, diagnoses and treats
mental health illnesses in each of his patients.  The purpose of
the Debtor's business is to perform services to its patients.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 16-12697) on May 17, 2016.


LKN PROPERTIES: Gouvis Buying Irvine Property for $4.2M
-------------------------------------------------------
LKN Properties, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California to authorize the sale of real
property located at the corner of 15 Studebaker/1 Bendix, Irvine,
California, to Gouvis Engineering for $4,160,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Dec. 14, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

The Debtor owns and operates the property. The property is a free
standing professional building consisting of two office spaces
totaling 16,000 square feet and is located in the "Irvine Spectrum
2" area of Irvine.  In its Bankruptcy Schedules, the Debtor
estimated the fair market value of the property at $3,840,000.

The largest office on the property (consisting of 5,000 square feet
on the first floor) is currently leased to LDB + Associates, Inc.
("LDB") pursuant to an office lease dated Oct. 1, 2007 for a period
of 10 years.  The lease will expire on Oct. 31, 2017.  The monthly
lease payment is $10,000.  LDB is an engineering consulting firm
and is affiliated with the Debtor through common ownership.

Prior to the Petition Date, approximately 6,000 square feet of the
property was leased to Creed Tobacco, Inc. ("Creed") under the
terms of an office lease dated Nov. 1, 2015 for a period of five
years at a monthly lease payment of $5,865.  However, in April,
2016, Creed defaulted under the terms of the lease and vacated the
property.  Creed owes the Debtor in excess of $50,000.  There is a
5,000 square foot office on the second floor that is currently
vacant.  

The property is encumbered by a first priority lien in favor of
Bank of America, N.A. ("BofA") in the approximate principal amount
of $1,700,392.  In April 2010, the Debtor
entered into an Interest Rate Swap Transaction ("IRST") with BofA
in connection with the original loan agreement.

The default caused by Creed greatly impacted the Debtor's cash flow
which caused the Debtor to default in its monthly payment
obligations to BofA.  This default allegedly also triggered a
termination of the IRST, which was asserted by BofA to cause an
acceleration of the loan and a termination fee of $427,742.

A Notice of Default and Election to Sell Under Deed of Trust was
recorded by First American Title Insurance Co. ("Foreclosure
Trustee") on May 4, 2016.  The Notice of Default indicated that
$29,449 was required, as of April 27, 2016, to cure the default
under the Deed of Trust recorded on Sept. 13, 2007.  Subsequently,
on Aug. 5, 2016, a Notice of Trustee Sale was recorded by the
Foreclosure Trustee ("Sale Notice").  The Sale Notice demanded
payment of the full payoff of the loan in the amount of $2,173,967.
Pursuant to the Sale Notice, the Foreclosure Trustee was to sell
the property at public auction on Sept. 6, 2016 at 1:30 p.m., for
the benefit of BofA.

The Debtor tendered the full amount of all principal and interest
payments due and owing pursuant to the Commercial Loan Invoice
prepared by BofA for Sept. 1, 2016, which totaled $75,123.  Despite
curing the default, on Sept. 1, 2016, BofA advised the Debtor that:
(1) it could no longer reinstate the loan with BofA, (2) the Debtor
was required to pay the accelerated indebtedness to BofA in full,
and (3) that BofA had rejected the wire transfer of $75,123.

After learning of BofA's refusal to allow cure of default, on Sept.
1, 2016, the Debtor offered BofA an additional $74,877 payment, for
a total payment of $150,000, to reinstate the loan with BofA and to
cancel the pending foreclosure sale.  Still, on Sept. 2, 2016, BofA
responded that it would not accept any reinstatement offers and
that the foreclosure sale would proceed as scheduled absent the
Debtor's payment of $2,173,966, plus interest, to BofA.

As the property has substantial equity and certainly value
sufficient to pay BofA in full, the filing was necessary in order
to stay the foreclosure sale set for Sept. 6, 2016 and to maximize
the value of the property for all creditors and equity holders.

On Sept. 16, 2016, the Debtor filed its Motion for Order
Authorizing Employment of Newmark of Southern California, Inc., a
California Corporation doing business as Newmark Grubb Knight Frank
as Real Estate Broker.  The last day to oppose the Broker
Employment Motion was Oct. 3, 2016.  No opposition was filed to the
Broker Employment Motion and on Oct.r 5, 2016, counsel for the
Debtor filed a declaration regarding no opposition to the Broker
Employment Motion and uploaded an appropriate order through the
Court's LOU System.

However, at the Nov. 9, 2016 Status Conference hearing for the
case, the Court advised the Debtor's counsel that the Broker
Employment Motion would not be approved unless Newmark Grubb Knight
Frank ("NGKF Firm") completely and unconditionally waived its
pre-petition claim of $10,000.

On Nov. 16, 2016, the Debtor filed its Supplement to the Broker
Employment Motion, wherein the NGKF Firm agreed to waive its
pre-petition claim as a condition to its employment as the Debtor's
real estate broker.  On Nov. 21, 2016, counsel for the Debtor
uploaded an amended order through the Court's LOU System.  By the
time of hearing on the Motion, it is anticipated that a Court order
will have been entered authorizing the employment of the NGKF Firm
as the Debtor's real estate broker.

The liens and encumbrances against the property and their proposed
treatment through their sale are:

   a. BofA: First priority deed of trust recorded with the Orange
County Recorder on Sept. 13, 2007 asserting a principal amount
owing of $2,200,000.  On Nov. 7, 2016, BofA filed a secured Proof
of Claim in the amount of $2,181,640 which includes the amount
allegedly owing on the deed of trust and the SWAP termination fee.
The principal amount due and owing under the first priority deed of
trust, including any interest and other fees that are not disputed
by the Debtor, will be paid through escrow on the sale transaction.
The Debtor disputes the IRST termination fee in the amount of
$427,742.  The Debtor proposes to retain this amount in escrow or
in the trust account of its counsel, Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP
until such time as the disputes related to the IRST termination fee
have been resolved.

   b. County of Orange: Real property taxes for the fiscal year
2016-17 1st installment $18,897.  Defaulted prior year taxes
(2014-15) of $94,550.  On Sept. 30, 2016, County of Orange filed a
secured Proof of Claim in the amount of $132,803.  All outstanding
real property taxes will be paid through escrow on the sale
transaction.

   c. Orange Woodworks, Inc.: Mechanics' lien recorded with the
Orange County Recorder on Nov. 19, 2008 asserting an amount owing
of $6,835.  This lien is disputed in that there is no amount owing
to Orange Woodworks as the claim was satisfied more than eight
years ago.  The Debtor will request that the lien be released,
discharged and terminated, that the sale proceed free and clear of
this lien and that the lien not attach to the sale proceeds.
Alternatively, if the lien is not removed prior to close of escrow,
as it is subject to a bona fide dispute, the Debtor seeks to sell
the property free and clear of the lien, with such disputed lien to
attach to the proceeds of the sale in the same validity and
priority as prior to the sale pending agreement with the creditor
or further Court order.

The Debtor and the Buyer entered into Standard Offer, Agreement and
Escrow Instructions for Purchase of Real Estate and Addendums.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/LKN_Properties_39_Sales.pdf

The principal terms of the sale of property to the Buyer are:

   a. Purchase Price:  $4,160,000, all cash.

   b. Deposit: $466,000

   c. Close of Escrow: Jan. 8, 2017

   d. Buyer's Credit: $20,000. The Debtor's broker and the Buyer's
broker will credit $10,000 from their brokerage fee towards the
Buyer's credit.

   e. Brokerage Fee: (i) Joe Woodka of the NGKF Firm - $124,800;
and (ii) Gary McArdell of Lee & Associates - $124,800.

   f. Purchase Without Warranties: "As Is" without warranties of
any kind, expressed or implied.

   g. Free and Clear of Liens and Encumbrance: The property will be
delivered to the Buyer free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances.

In order to facilitate the sale of the property, the Debtor desires
to sell the property free and clear of the disputed liens and
encumbrances.  The Debtor asks the Court to approve the payment to
BofA, less the disputed amount of the IRST termination fee, and the
County of Orange from the proceeds of the sale.  Further, the
Debtor asks the Court to authorize the Debtor to pay from the
proceeds of the sale of the property all reasonable and customary
escrow fees, recording fees, title insurance premiums and closing
costs necessary and proper to close escrow.

As provided in the Purchase Agreement, the Debtor seeks
authorization to pay a real estate broker commission in the amount
of 6% of the purchase price (or $249,600).  It should be noted that
the NGKF Firm and the Buyer's broker have agreed to each credit the
Buyer $10,000 from their brokerage fee to be used towards parking
surface upgrades, or any other improvements the Buyer wishes to
perform.

The Debtor believes that the proposed sale of the property is the
best means for maximizing the value of the property for the Estate
and creditors.  Specifically, the proposed sale transaction will
allow the Debtor to fully satisfy the claim of BofA and the County
of Orange in full.  As the property is the Debtor's only asset,
upon closing of the sale, the Debtor will seek to dismiss its
bankruptcy case after paying creditors in full.  The sale is
estimated to generate approximately $1,940,398.

The Debtor asks that the Court in the discretion provided it under
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h), waive the 14-day stay
of the order granting the Motion and approving the sale pursuant to
the terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement.

                    About LKN Properties Inc.

LKN Properties Inc. is a nonresidential building operator located
at 3762 Hendrix Street, Irvine, California.

LKN filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Lead
Case No. 16-13734) on Sept. 6, 2016.  The petition was signed by
Lien Nguyen, President.  Judge Catherine E. Bauer is assigned to
the case.

The Debtor estimated assets and debt of $1 million to $10 million.

The Debtor hired Shulman Hodges and Bastian LLP as counsel.


MAHI LLC: Can Use United Community Bank Cash Until Jan. 18
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Douglas D. Dodd of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Louisiana authorized Mahi, LLC and Om Hospitality, LLC,
to use United Community Bank's cash collateral on an interim basis,
until Jan. 18, 2017.

The Debtors are directed to make adequate protection payments of
$4,000 each to United Community Bank not later than Dec. 15, 2016,
and Jan. 15, 2017.

United Community Bank is granted a security interest in and lien
upon the cash collateral and all other currently owned and
after-acquired assets of the Debtor, and their proceeds, products,
rents, offspring and profits.

A final hearing on the use of cash collateral is scheduled on
Wednesday, Jan. 18, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Consent Order, dated Nov. 21, 2016, is
available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/MahiLLC2016_1610601_175.pdf

United Community Bank is represented by:

          Brandon K. Black, Esq.
          JONES WALKER LLP
          8555 United Plaza Blvd.
          Baton Rouge, LA 70809
          Telephone: (225) 248-2128
          E-mail: bblack@joneswalker.com

                    About Mahi, LLC

Mahi, LLC, and OM Hospitality, LLC, sought protection under Chapter
11 (Bankr. M.D. La. Case Nos. 16-10601 and 16-10602) on May 24,
2016.  The petitions were signed by Bhagirath Joshi, manager.  The
cases are jointly administered.  The cases are assigned to Judge
Douglas D. Dodd.  The Debtors are represented by Ryan James
Richmond, Esq., at Stewart Robbins & Brown LLC.  The Debtors
estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of $1 million to
$10 million.


MARINA BIOTECH: Inks Merger Agreement with IthenaPharma
-------------------------------------------------------
Marina Biotech, Inc., announced that it has signed a definitive
merger agreement with IthenaPharma Inc., a company focused on the
development and commercialization of combination products for pain,
arthritis, hypertension, and cancer.  IthenaPharma is a part of the
Autotelic Inc. consortium of companies.  The merger closed on Nov.
15, 2016.

Under the terms of the merger agreement, Marina Biotech is issuing
approximately 53,097,022 shares of its common stock, representing
approximately 64% of the issued and outstanding shares of its
common stock immediately following the completion of the merger, to
the stockholders of IthenaPharma.  Marina Biotech is also assuming
warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of IthenaPharma common stock,
which warrants will be exercisable for approximately 2.87 million
shares of Marina Biotech common stock.  In addition, in order to
support the combined company, Dr. Vuong Trieu has committed to
funding the operations of Marina with a line of credit of $540,000
as well as operational support at Autotelic. Marina will grant two
board seats to IthenaPharma, with the first going to Dr. Vuong
Trieu, the chairman of the board of Autotelic, Inc., who will also
become chairman of the board of Marina immediately following the
closing of the merger, and the second board seat to a person
reasonably acceptable to Marina Biotech to be nominated by Mr.
Trieu after deal closing.

The merger with IthenaPharma will give Marina Biotech a clear path
to revenue and profitability, with the potential for two commercial
products by 2019.  In addition, scientists at both companies see
synergies between IthenaPharma's drugs and Marina's CEQ508 drug,
unlocking its potential to treat not only familial adenomatous
polyposis (FAP) but colorectal cancer in general.  Both drugs
target Beta-catenin and it is anticipated that within one year
following the completion of the merger we would able enter clinical
testing against colorectal cancer.  The synergy of the combination
is anticipated to de-risk and accelerate Marina Biotech's clinical
development program.

Dr. Trieu, an expert in pharmaceutical development and
commercialization, currently serves as Chairman of the Board for
the Autotelic consortium of companies including Oncotelic,
Stocosil, IthenaPharma, LipoMedics, and Autotelic Inc.  Previously
he was President and CEO of Igdrasol, a developer of 2nd generation
Abraxane, where he pioneered the regulatory pathway for approval of
paclitaxel nanomedicine through a single bioequivalence trial
against Abraxane.  When Igdrasol merged with Sorrento Therapeutics,
he became CSO and Board Director.  At Stocosil he again pioneered
the regulatory pathway for taking Olostar, a
rosuvastatin/olmesartan FDC into the US as an NDA using only Korean
data.  He has also been Board Director of Cenomed, a company
focusing on CNS drug development.  Before that he was Director of
Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, and Biology at Abraxis Bioscience,
where he led the development of albumin encapsulated therapeutics
along with building high throughput platform for small molecules,
mirRNA, kinases.  The Autotelic consortium of companies include the
highly successful exit at Igdrasol where it was acquired for up to
$1.2 billion by NantPharma and the $10 million equity stake in
LipoMedics by Fangsheng Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd.  Dr. Trieu
obtained his doctorate in Microbiology/Molecular Biology from the
University of Oklahoma.

"This merger is truly transformative for Marina Biotech, which has
now become a clinical stage development and commercialization
company.  I am very excited about the prospects for the new Marina
and am confident in our ability to create shareholder value," said
Joseph Ramelli, CEO at Marina.  "I have had the pleasure of getting
to know Vuong quite well over the last four months and could not be
more impressed with his vision and his history of innovation and
value creation the biotech industry."

"Autotelic is a fully integrated pharmaceutical company with
strength in regulatory, clinical and commercialization.  We welcome
the inclusion of Marina into our consortium of companies and
looking forward to fully leverage the expertise at Autotelic to
unlock the potential at Marina Biotech and build shareholder value
for Marina Biotech," said Dr. Trieu.

                    Appointment of Director

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and in connection with the
Merger, Vuong Trieu was appointed to the Company's Board of
Directors, to serve until the Company's 2017 annual meeting of
stockholders or until his earlier death, resignation or removal. In
connection with the appointment of Dr. Trieu to the Board, the
Board adopted resolutions to set the size of the Board at five
directors, to be effective upon the closing of the Merger.  The
Company also agreed in the Merger Agreement that it would appoint a
person identified by Dr. Trieu, which person is reasonably
acceptable to the Company, to the Board not more than 30 days
following the closing of the Merger.

Other than as a result of the Merger Agreement, the transactions
contemplated thereby and the agreements entered into in connection
therewith, there are no arrangements or understandings between Dr.
Trieu and any other persons pursuant to which Dr. Trieu was
selected as a director.  In addition, there are no transactions
between the Company and Dr. Trieu or his immediate family members
requiring disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
other than that the Company and Dr. Trieu are parties to the Line
Letter, pursuant to which Dr. Trieu offered to the Company an
unsecured line of credit in an amount not to exceed $540,000, to be
used for current operating expenses of the Company.  Dr. Trieu is
also the chief executive officer of Autotelic LLC and the Chairman
of the Board of Directors of Autotelic Inc., which entities are
parties to the License Agreement and the Master Services Agreement.
Following the completion of the Merger, Autotelic LLC owns
approximately 25.8% of the issued and outstanding shares of the
Company's common stock, and Autotelic Inc. owns approximately 5.9%
of issued and outstanding shares of the Company's common stock.

In connection with his appointment as a member of the Board, Dr.
Trieu was also appointed to serve as Chairman of the Board.

              Option Grants to Current Directors

In connection with and subject to the completion of the Merger, the
Board approved the grant to each of the current members of the
Board of options to purchase up to 35,000 shares of the Company's
common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share.  The options
will be exercisable for the five-year period beginning on the date
of grant.

                       Other Events

On Nov. 15, 2016, the Company agreed to issue to Novosom 1,500,000
shares of the Company's common stock upon the closing of the Merger
in consideration of Novosom's agreement that the consummation of
the Merger would not constitute a "Liquidity Event" under that
certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of July 27, 2010, between
and among the Company, Novosom and Steffen Panzner, Ph.D., and thus
that no additional consideration under the Novosom Agreement would
be due to Novosom as a result of the consummation of the Merger.
The Company agreed that it would, within 30 days following the date
on which the Company files with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the audited financial statements that are required to be
filed by the Company under the Securities Act as a result of the
consummation of the Merger, file with the Commission a registration
statement to register the resale of such shares by Novosom, and
that it would use commercially reasonable efforts to cause such
registration statement to be declared effective within 60 days of
the filing thereof.

A full-text copy of the Agreement and Plan of Merger is available
for free at https://is.gd/udQ24t

                      About Marina Biotech

Marina Biotech, Inc., headquartered in Bothell, Washington, is a
biotechnology company focused on the discovery, development and
commercialization of nucleic acid-based therapies utilizing gene
silencing approaches such as RNA interference ("RNAi") and
blocking messenger RNA ("mRNA") translation.  The Company's goal
is to improve human health through the development, either through
its own efforts or those of its collaboration partners and
licensees, of these nucleic acid-based therapeutics as well as the
delivery technologies that together provide superior treatment
options for patients.  The Company has multiple proprietary
technologies integrated into a broad nucleic acid-based drug
discovery platform, with the capability to deliver novel nucleic
acid-based therapeutics via systemic, local and oral
administration to target a wide range of human diseases, based on
the unique characteristics of the cells and organs involved in
each disease.

On June 1, 2012, the Company announced that, due to its financial
condition, it had implemented a furlough of approximately 90% of
its employees and ceased substantially all day-to-day operations.
Since that time substantially all of the furloughed employees have
been terminated.  As of Sept. 30, 2012, the Company had
approximately 11 remaining employees, including all of its
executive officers, all of whom are either furloughed or working
on reduced salary.  As a result, since June 1, 2012, its internal
research and development efforts have been minimal, pending
receipt of adequate funding.

Marina Biotech reported a net loss of $6.47 million on $500,000 of
license and other revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014,
compared to a net loss of $1.57 million on $2.11 million of license
and other revenue in 2013.

As of June 30,2 016, Marina Biotech had $7.14 million in total
assets, $6.07 million in total liabilities and $1.07 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Wolf & Company, P.C., in Boston, Massachusetts, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations, has a significant accumulated
deficit and does not have sufficient capital to fund its
operations.  This raises substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


MARK JENKINSON: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Dec. 13
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of Mark Gerard Jenkinson
at a hearing on December 13, at 11:00 a.m.

The hearing will be held at Courtroom 3E, 50 Walnut Street, Newark,
New Jersey.

The court will also consider at the hearing the final approval of
the Debtor's disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved
on November 8.  

The order set a December 6 deadline for creditors to cast their
votes and file their objections to the proposed plan filed by the
Debtor on November 3.

The Debtor is represented by:

     Karen E. Bezner, Esq.
     567 Park Avenue, Suite 103
     Scotch Plains, NJ 07076
     Phone: (908) 322-8484

                  About Mark Gerard Jenkinson

Mark Gerard Jenkinson sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. N.J. Case No. 13-24701) on July 2, 2013.
The case is assigned to Judge Rosemary Gambardella.


MATHIOPOULOS 3M: Allowed to Use Cash Through Jan. 31
----------------------------------------------------
Judge Ronald H. Sargis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of California authorized Mathiopoulos 3M Family Limited
Partnership to use cash collateral from Dec. 1, 2016, to Jan. 31,
2017.

The expenses that the Debtor is authorized to pay for using cash
collateral, among others, are:

        Expense                                  Amount Per Month
        -------                                  ----------------
Property Insurance                                        $1,045
Pacific Gas and Electric                                    $300
Recology Auburn (Garbage)                                   $200
Pest control                                                $123
Telephone for business                                      $200
Life Insurance Policies                                     $675
Property Maintenance, Landscaping, Parking Lot Cleaning     $704
Misc (Fuel, Office Supplies, Repair, Postage, etc.)       $1,500

The Debtor is likewise authorized to pay property taxes in an
amount not to exceed $23,779.

Creditors having an interest in the cash collateral were given
replacement liens in the postpetition rents in the same priority,
validity, and extent as they exited in the cash collateral
expended.

The Debtor is directed to continue making monthly adequate
protection payments to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in the amount of
$13,633.

A hearing on the Debtor's Motion is scheduled on Jan. 12, 2017, at
10:30 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Nov. 19, 2016, is available at

http://bankrupt.com/misc/Mathiopoulos3M2016_1620852_145.pdf

                 About Mathiopoulos 3M Family L.P.

Mathioupoulos 3M Family Limited Partnership filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 16-20852) on Feb. 16, 2016.
The petition was signed by Diane M. Mathiopoulos, authorized
representative.  The case is assigned to Judge Ronald H. Sargis.
The Debtor disclosed total assets at $5.36 million and total
liabilities at $3.04 million.  The Debtor is represented by J. Luke
Hendrix, Esq., at Desmond, Nolan, Livaich & Cunningham.


MCSGLOBAL INC: Kellton Buying All Assets for $200K
--------------------------------------------------
Bradford F. Englander, the Chapter 11 trustee for MCSGlobal, Inc.,
asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
to authorize the sale of substantially all assets of the Debtor,
and the assumption and assignment of the Debtor's services
contracts, to Kellton Tech Solutions, Ltd., or its designated
assignee, for $200,000, subject to higher and better offers.

The Court previously approved the Trustee's motion to sell the
Debtor's assets to Suresh Doki.  But on the eve of the scheduled
closing, Mr. Doki informed the Trustee that he lacked funds to
close, and would not proceed despite his prior written
representations that he had the necessary funds in hand.  As a
result of Mr. Doki's flagrant misrepresentations and willful breach
of contract, the Trustee renewed discussions with Kellton and
ultimately entered into the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement.  In
short, the economic terms are substantially the same as the terms
of the Doki agreement.  The most significant difference is that
instead of providing for a release of Mr. Doki and related parties,
the Sale Agreement provides for the release by the Trustee of
estate claims against Kellton, and a release by Kellton of its
claims against the estate.

The Trustee further seeks a bar order prohibiting the assertion or
prosecution against Kellton of any estate claims or causes of
action by any creditor in the case.  The Trustee is not seeking a
bar against the prosecution of any genuine third party claim; he
seeks only a bar against the assertion of claims that are property
of the estate and subject to the Trustee's control.

The relief is necessary and appropriate on the facts of the case.
After the Debtor filed its chapter 11 petition, the Debtor's
largest creditor, ProLink Services, LLC – Holding filed a
complaint against Kellton in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia asserting causes of action that the
Trustee believes were property of the estate.  At the Trustee's
request, ProLink dismissed such complaint without prejudice.  But
Kellton, understandably, requests assurance that it will not be
sued again for claims that are to be released by the Trustee at
closing.

The Debtor's financial condition has continued to deteriorate since
the Doki Sale Hearing.  The current liabilities of the Debtor have
been increasing each month by approximately $10,000, and, as of the
end of October, total $246,475.  The current liabilities exceeded
the Debtor's cash on hand ($100,867) as of the end of October by a
factor of nearly 2.5.

According to the Debtor, its demands for its cash have also
increased.  Employees have requested payment of deferred salary,
which liability now totals $136,746.  The Debtor's present cash
position does not permit the Trustee to honor such requests at the
time.

Contemporaneously with Mr. Doki's default under the Doki Sale
Agreement, the Trustee received additional documents from Kellton
pursuant to the Trustee's longstanding discovery request.  The
recently provided documents permitted the Trustee to substantially
complete his review of the estate's potential claims against
Kellton (and its affiliates).  The Trustee believes that various
claims could be asserted against the Kellton entities, most
significantly claims for fraudulent transfers under Section 548 of
the Bankruptcy Code.

Having completed his review and analysis of these additional
documents, the Trustee has determined in the exercise of his
business judgment that the sale of substantially all of the assets
of the Debtor and the assumption and assignment of the Debtor's
Customer Contracts in effect at closing to Kellton or its
designated assignee on the terms set forth in the Asset Purchase
and Sale Agreement is in the best interests of the Debtor and its
estate.

A copy of the Sale Agreement attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/MCSGlobal_Inc_182_Sales.pdf

The salient terms of the Sale Agreement are:

   a. Purchase Price: The purchase price is $200,000, plus the
Assumed Liabilities.

   b. Free and Clear: The sale will be free and clear of all liens,
claims, and encumbrances, to the extent provided under section
363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code.

   c. Deposit: Simultaneously with the execution and delivery of
the Sale Agreement by the Buyer, the Buyer will deliver to Seller a
deposit of $30,000 in immediately available funds, to be increased
to $100,000 upon court approval of the sale.

   d. Purchased Assets. The Buyer will obtain Seller's right,
title, and interest in and to the assets and rights of any kind,
whether tangible or intangible, real or personal, owned by Seller
or in which Seller has any interest (other than Excluded Assets),
used in the operation of the Debtor, including without limitation
the following: (i) the Customer Contracts in effect as of closing;
(ii) accounts receivable and work-in-progress in connection with
the Customer Contracts; (iii) furniture, fixtures and equipment;
(iv) a copy of all business records pertaining to Purchased Assets;
and (v) to the extent transferable, all licenses, permits, and
other governmental authorizations required to operate the Debtor in
the manner presently conducted.

   e. Assumption of Liabilities: At closing, Buyer will assume and
will pay when due all debts, obligations, and liabilities of
Seller, whether known or unknown or contingent or fixed, other than
Excluded Liabilities, existing as of the closing, including without
limitation all obligations and liabilities accruing, arising out
of, or relating to the Customer Contracts, including but not
limited to any and all obligations as may exist with respect to the
cure of any default and adequate assurance of future performance
under or with respect to such contracts.

   f. Releases: At Closing, the Seller, the Buyer and the Buyer's
specified affiliates will execute a mutual general release of
claims against each other.

   g. As Is, Where Is Sale: Except as expressly warranted, the sale
is "as is, where is" with all faults, and without any warranty,
express or implied.

   h. Agreement Subject to Higher and Better Offers: The Sale
Agreement is contingent upon approval of the Bankruptcy Court, and
is subject to higher and better offers.

Kellton is assuming responsibility for "all obligations as may
exist with respect to the cure of any default and adequate
assurance of future performance under or with respect to Customer
Contracts" pursuant to section 2.3(A) of the Sale Agreement.  The
Trustee is not aware of any default in the Customer Contracts that
must be cured in order for the contracts to be assumed and assigned
to Kellton.  In the event that any cure payment is necessary,
however, Kellton will be required to pay any cure amounts.

The Trustee asks that effective upon the closing, the Debtor will,
subject to applicable non-bankruptcy law, change its name to a name
to be determined by the Trustee prior to closing.  Thereafter, all
captions, pleadings, and filings in the case will be changed to
reflect the new name of the Debtor.

To facilitate a timely closing, the Debtor seeks a waiver of the
14-day stay pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d).  The
Sale Agreement provides that closing must occur on or before Dec.
31, 2016.  The hearing to consider the Motion is scheduled to be
held on Dec. 20, 2016.  Without a waiver of the 14-day stay, the
Trustee and Kellton will not be able to close under the Sale
Agreement by the Dec. 31, 2016 deadline.

The Purchaser is represented by:

           Daniel J. Shridan, Esq.
           STARK & STARK
           993 Lenox Drive
           Lawrence, NJ 08648

                     About MCSGlobal, Inc.

MCSGlobal, Inc., is a staffing provider specializing in
information
technology services located in Sterling, Virginia. MCSGlobal
contracted to provide information technology staffing services to
at least thirteen clients in the mid-Atlantic region.

MCSGlobal sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No.
15-11674) on May 14, 2015.  The petition was signed by Suresh
Doki,
president.  The Debtor estimated assets of $0 to $ 50,000 and
$500,001 to $1 million in debt.  Dawn C. Stewart, Esq. at The
Stewart Law Firm, PLLC, serves as the Debtor's counsel.


MDC PARTNERS: S&P Lowers CCR to 'B' on Cash Flow Deficits
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it lowered its corporate credit rating
on New York City-based MDC Partners Inc. to 'B' from 'B+'. The
outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level rating on the
company's senior unsecured notes to 'B' from 'B+'.  The '4'
recovery rating remains unchanged indicating S&P's expectation for
average recovery (30%-50%; upper half of the range) of principal in
the event of a payment default.

The downgrade reflects MDC's weaker than expected performance year
to date resulting in negative free cash flow in the current year.
The company had high cash outflows in 2016 mainly due to working
capital use, and deferred acquisition payments.  The combined
effect of negative EBITDA growth and high cash flow deficits
resulted in a tightening of the company's covenant cushion to below
15% in the last two quarters and S&P expects it to remain below 15%
until at least the second half of 2017.

S&P expects growth to return to a more normal level in 2017, with
expected EBITDA growth of 10%-12% for the year.  This is lower than
S&P's prior EBITDA forecast of 12%–14% EBITDA growth. However,
S&P expects the first half of the year to continue to be a high
cash outflow period as historically, most of the deferred
acquisition payment is incurred during this period.  Given the
tight covenant cushions, S&P expects the company to be able to hold
only $180 million at the end of each quarter under its
$325 million revolving facility (leverage covenant of 5.5x) (though
the company has full access to this revolver intraquarter), further
constraining cash flows in the first half of the year.  S&P expects
the company's deferred acquisition payment in the second quarter to
be funded by a combination of working capital inflow during the
quarter and revolver draws.

S&P's corporate credit rating on MDC reflects S&P's assessment of
the company's well-positioned, defensible market position in the
industry, small agency network, and limited global presence.  Its
key subsidiaries include Crispin Porter + Bogusky, 72andSunny and
Anomaly, which have strong creative reputations that differentiate
MDC from its larger peers.  The company's strong digital
capabilities position it well to meet the increasing demand for
nontraditional advertising.  MDC's smaller scale, limits its
expansion capabilities, particularly within the higher margin media
buying business.  Furthermore, the company's scale results in
increased client concentration and loss of a key client can result
in significant earnings volatility compared to its larger peers
with greater geographic and client diversification.  It also limits
the potential for economies of scale and operating leverage from
shared services, resulting in lower EBITDA margins compared with
those of its larger global peers.  The company operates primarily
in North America where it generates close to 90% of its revenue.
The lack of scale and global presence could temper its growth
opportunities, particularly when competing for contracts from
global advertisers.

S&P forecasts MDC's leverage to be between 6.2x–6.5x in 2016
before declining to mid-5x by the end of 2017.  Adjusted leverage
was 6.4x as of Sept. 30, 2016, and included $256 million in put
obligations and deferred acquisition payments (earnouts), which are
only paid out when the acquired companies achieve specific EBITDA
results.  In addition to the earnouts, S&P also adjusts MDC's debt
for the present value of operating leases ($204 million as of Sept.
30, 2016).

S&P's base-case scenario also assumes these:

   -- U.S. GDP growth of 1.5% in 2016 and 2.4% in 2017.  These
      forecasts correlate with expected ad spending by the
      company's clients and, in turn, its revenue generation
      capabilities.

   -- Organic revenue will grow at a low-single-digit percentage
      rate annually in 2016 and 2017, driven by growth in the U.S.

      and the company's focus on digital capabilities.

   -- Annual growth from acquisitions of 2.0%-3.0% in 2016
      primarily from the Forsman & Bodenfors acquisition in June
      2016; and about 1%-2% 2017.

   -- Revenue will grow annually at a mid-single-digit percentage
      rate in 2016 and 2017.

   -- No EBITDA growth in 2016 and growth at a low-double-digit
      percentage rate in 2017, largely due to organic growth, via
      new business wins, and sizable cost savings.

   -- Adjusted EBITDA margins will decrease by 100–120 basis
      points (bps) in 2016, largely as a factor of weaker results,

      and the company's cost-alignment efforts including real
      estate consolidation and severance; improve by 80–100 bps
in
      2017, as the cost-alignment savings are recognized and
      organic growth from new business wins in 2016 start to take
      root.

   -- Negative discretionary cash flow of about $40 million to
      $50 million in 2016, driven by higher working capital use,
      restructuring expenses and lower EBITDA growth; and positive

      discretionary cash flow of $90 million to $100 million in
      2017 as EBITDA growth returns and working capital
      requirements return to a normal rate.

   -- Cash deferred acquisition payments of about $135 million to
      $140 million in 2016 and $110 million to $120 million in
      2017.

   -- Based on these assumptions, S&P arrives at these credit
      measures:

   -- Adjusted leverage will be 6.0x–6.5x in 2016 and 5.0x–5.5x
in
      2017.  Adjusted leverage was 6.4x as of Sept. 30, 2016, on a

      rolling-12-month basis.

   -- Adjusted EBITDA interest coverage ratio of about 3.0x–3.3x

      in 2016 and 2017.  The adjusted EBITDA interest coverage
      ratio was 2.8x as of Sept. 30, 2016, on a rolling-12-month
      basis.

S&P views MDC's liquidity as adequate over the next 12 months.
S&P's assessment incorporates these assumptions and factors:

   -- S&P expects sources of liquidity (including cash and access
      to the revolving credit facility) to exceed its uses by more

      than 1.2x over the next 12 months.

   -- S&P expects net sources to remain positive, even if EBITDA
      declines more than 15%.

   -- S&P expects covenant cushion to remain tight at below 15%
      over the next 2-3 quarters.

   -- S&P believes MDC has sound relationships with its banks,
      based on recent credit agreement amendments, and has a
      satisfactory standing in the credit markets.

Principal Liquidity Sources:

   -- Cash balances of about $21.7 million as of Sept. 30, 2016;

   -- $180 million of availability on its revolving credit
      facility at the end of each quarter over the next 12 months;

   -- Cash flow from operations of about $10 million-$15 million
      in 2016 and $115 million-$125 million 2017; and

   -- Working capital source of about $10 million in 2017.

Principal Liquidity Uses:

   -- Capital spending requirements of about $25 million to
      $30 million in 2016 and 2017;

   -- Deferred acquisition payments of about $135 million to
      $140 million in 2016 and $110 million to $120 million in
      2017; and

   -- Working capital use of $90 million-$95 million in 2016.

Covenant Analysis:

   -- MDC's revolving term loan has covenants including a maximum
      total leverage ratio of 5.5x

   -- S&P expects the total leverage covenant to be about between
      8%–12% over the next four quarters, before rising above 15%

      by the end of 2017, under S&P's base-case assumptions

   -- S&P believes the company will only be able to hold about
      $180 million on its revolving credit facility, at the end of

      each quarter given the tight covenant cushions

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectations that while covenant
cushions are likely to be below 15% for the next four quarters,
they could improve to above 15% by the end of 2017.  S&P's outlook
also reflects its expectation that adjusted leverage, which
includes $120 million in deferred acquisition payments, will remain
above mid-5.0x for the next year.

S&P could lower the rating if the company's cash flow generation is
less than S&P's base-case assumptions.  S&P expects cash flow from
operations of about $70 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, and
between $110 million-$120 million in 2017.  S&P could also lower
the rating if it expects the covenant cushion to remain below 10%
on a sustained basis.

S&P could raise the rating if leverage improves to the low
5.0x-area on a sustained basis, and the company generates
consistent free cash flow such that discretionary cash flow to debt
will remain above 10%.  An upgrade would also depend on covenant
cushion staying consistently above 15%.



MEADOWS AT CYPRESS: Jan 30 Deadline for Filing Disclosure Statement
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge K. Rodney May of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida, Tampa Division, issued an order establishing
January 30, 2017, as deadline for The Meadows at Cypress Gardens,
L.L.C., to file a disclosure statement and plan of reorganization.

The Disclosure Statement must, at the minimum, contain adequate
information pertaining to the Debtor in the following areas:
pre−and post−petition financial performance; reasons for filing
Chapter 11; steps taken by the Debtor since filing of the petition
to facilitate its reorganization; projections reflecting how the
Plan will be feasibly consummated; a liquidation analysis; and a
discussion of the Federal tax consequences as described in section
1125(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.

       About The Meadows at Cypress Gardens

The Meadows at Cypress Gardens, L.L.C. filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-08495) on September 30, 2016, and is
represented by David W Steen, Esq., in Tampa, Florida.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had $100,000 to $500,000 in
estimated assets and $1 million to $10 million in estimated
liabilities.


MEDIMPACT HOLDINGS: Fitch Assigns 'BB-' Issuer Default Rating
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'BB-' Issuer Default Rating to
MedImpact Holdings, Inc. and its issuing subsidiary, MI OpCo
Holdings, Inc. The Rating Outlook is Positive.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Smaller Scale in Consolidated Industry: MedImpact is a top-5
pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) but is significantly smaller than
its three largest competitors. Significant size differences are
less pronounced than revenues imply (due to differing accounting
policies and varied business mixes), but is nevertheless meaningful
in a largely consolidated industry where scale is very important.

Differentiated, Independent Business Model: Unlike nearly all its
peers, MedImpact does not own its own fulfilment/dispensing
capabilities (i.e. mail-order or specialty pharmacies). The firm's
differentiated approach to avoiding conflicts of interest is the
most radical among major PBMs and could position the firm to win
new business in the midst of possible disruptive industry shifts in
the 2017-2019 timeframe. The strategy could also disadvantage
MedImpact, however, to the extent potential new customers continue
to demand mail-order and/or specialty pharmacy offerings from their
PBMs.

Stable Operations, Cash Flows: Because of their long-dated
contracts and often diverse customer bases, PBMs usually have good
insight into future business wins/losses and associated cash flows.
Although stable and more than sufficient to cover term loan
amortization, absolute cash flow dollars are somewhat light
compared with peers, with FCF as a percentage of EBITDA expected to
approximate 35% (>60% for its largest peer, Express Scripts).

Moderate Leverage to Decline: Term loan amortization and decent
EBITDA growth are expected to contribute to de-leveraging over the
ratings horizon. Gross debt/EBITDA and adjusted debt/FFO are
expected to decline to 1.7x and 2.9x, respectively, by year-end
2018, from 2.4x and 3.7x at year-end 2016. Debt leverage metrics
are roughly in line with those at 'BBB' rated competitor Express
Scripts.

Private Ownership: MedImpact is 100% owned by its founder/CEO and a
small number of other management employees. However, Fitch does not
foresee adverse effects to operations or capital deployment as a
result, as the CEO is well-respected as a thought-leader in the
industry and as capital deployed for share repurchases and ultimate
parent dividends has been relatively modest.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

MedImpact's 'BB-' IDR considers the company's smaller scale,
somewhat light absolute cash flows, and lack of very large
customers, offset by relatively low debt leverage, stable cash
flows, and the expectation that growth will outpace the overall PBM
industry. The Positive Outlook represents Fitch's expectation for
de-leveraging in 2017-2018 and for possible industry developments
that lead to new customer wins for MedImpact.

Future developments that could, individually or collectively,
contribute to the consideration of an upgrade to 'BB' include:

   -- An expectation for gross debt/EBITDA and adjusted debt/FFO
      to be sustained around or below 2x and 3x, respectively;

   -- Successful renewal of top customer contracts in 2017
      (excluding two known lost contracts), with support for
      growth expectations from those existing customers;

   -- The addition of new customers of size validating MedImpact's

      differentiated business strategy.

Future developments that could, individually or collectively,
contribute to the consideration of a rating downgrade to 'B+'
include:

   -- An expectation for gross debt/EBITDA and adjusted debt/FFO
      to be sustained above 3x and 4x, respectively;

   -- The loss of top PBM customers suggesting an invalidation of
      MedImpact's differentiated business strategy;

   -- Margin deterioration or a shift in capital allocation that
      pressures cash flows and/or liquidity in light of increasing

      term loan amortization payments.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

   -- Soft revenue growth in 2016-2017 due to the loss of two key
      customers, improving in 2018-2019 under the assumption of
      client retention and new client wins;

   -- Stable margins, incrementally lower than 2015, with modest
      margin improvement possible in 2017-2018 due to the
      termination of lower-margin clients, with upside potential
      as the company more deeply penetrates its current customers
      with higher-margin services;

   -- Debt leverage reduction to 1.7x at YE2018 from EBITDA growth

      ($16 million in both 2017 and 2018) and term loan
      amortization ($20 million in both 2017 and 2018);

   -- No material M&A;

   -- Modest cash deployed for dividends ($2 million annually) and

      net share repurchases ($5 million) at MedImpact Holdings.

LIQUIDITY & DEBT MATURITIES

Ample Liquidity, Stable Cash Flows: Cash on hand routinely outpaces
annual debt maturities, though lower cash balances have been held
since 4Q15. Liquidity is supported by stable cash generation and
negative working capital, both characteristic of the PBM industry,
and decently strong capital market access.

Reduced Interest Costs: The new $400 million term loan borrowed in
July 2016 carries an applicable margin of 225 bps, compared to 475
bps under the previously negotiated term loan. The previous term
loan refinanced 10.5% unsecured notes.

Manageable Debt Maturities: MedImpact's only material debt
maturities over the next four years are term loan amortization
payments, approximately as follows: $20 million in 2017 and 2018,
$25 million in 2019, and $35 million in 2020.

The company has not maintained a revolving credit facility since
2014. All unrestricted cash is considered 'readily available'.

TWO LOST CUSTOMERS TO STALL ORGANIC GROWTH IN 2016-2017

MedImpact's revenues have nearly doubled and margins improved more
than 500 bps from 2012 to 2015. Such strong performance is the
result of new business and growth from existing customers.
According to MedImpact, it processed 229 million claims for its
top-20 customers in 2015 compared to 107 million in 2012, leading
to an increase in revenues of $139 million.

However, two of MedImpacts top-10 customers by revenue have decided
not to renew their contracts with the firm. Contract losses will
affect 2016 and 2017 results, reducing top-line growth but with a
less pronounced EBITDA impact. Notably, only two of MedImpact's
current top-10 PBM customers have more than two years remaining on
their current contracts. Average PBM contract are three-five years
in length. Current customer renewals will be vital to maintaining
growth and profit margins in the near- to medium-term.

INDUSTRY EVOLUTIONS MAY FAVOR MEDIMPACT; SMALLER SCALE, BUSINESS
MODEL COULD DISADVANTAGE

MedImpact's "conflict-free" business model (i.e. does not own
fulfilment/dispensing) could position the firm well to benefit from
underlying pressures and trends within the U.S. drug channel.
MedImpact asserts that a PBM business that does not operate its own
pharmacies - particularly in specialty - can better address issues
related to a recently heightened focus on pharmaceutical pricing,
with continued calls for increased overall transparency, and rising
cost trend associated with expensive specialty therapies. Overall
weak satisfaction with major PBMs, pending large-scale health
insurance mergers, and the upcoming expiration of many of the
largest PBM contracts could provide opportunities for significant
shifts in the industry.

As the largest managed care organizations (MCOs) continue to merge,
Fitch expects regional MCOs to increasingly seek to provide more
customized programs for their members in order to retain and win
new business. MedImpact's flexible approach to formulary management
and "conflict-free" model make the firm an attractive partner for
the 425 regional MCOs that provide coverage to fewer than one
million lives (per CMS).

"While we expect the firm to continue to add smaller regional MCOs,
the addition of a major managed care customer would provide a
strong validation of MedImpact's business strategy." Fitch said.
Fitch does not expect the firm to dramatically give up on price
just to win such a contract and, in fact, winning large contracts
is not a part of MedImpact's outlined growth strategy. At this
time, we are unsure if MedImpact's smaller scale and lack of
in-house mail-order capabilities might prevent such business wins.
We view the ability to leverage scale in negotiating drug pricing
and to provide efficient mail-order services as cornerstones of
today's PBM offerings.

NASCENT SPECIALTY OFFERING COULD STRENGTHEN VALUE PROPOSITION

MedImpact is marketing its relatively new MedDirect specialty
program offering for current clients in an attempt to win new ones.
The program is run in partnership with specialty pharmacies run by
four firms: US Bioservices (owned by AmerisourceBergen, a pharma
distributor), Walgreens, Humana, and Commcare (owned by Premier).
Walgreens is by far the largest of the four partners but still much
smaller than the specialty pharmacy networks run by CVS Health and
Express Scripts. Interestingly, Walgreens recently struck a deal
with Prime Therapeutics, one of MedImpact's peers, to combine their
mail-order and specialty pharmacy businesses under a new,
jointly-owned company.

The "hub" offerings in MedDirect seem similar to those offered by
other major PBMs, except without the potential or apparent conflict
of interest inherent in those PBMs owning their own specialty
pharmacies. Mail-order services are offered either through the
above mentioned partners or through smaller independent mail-order
providers. A robust specialty solution at least keeps MedImpact
in-step with its major competitors, opening the doors to possible
new customers who may have been kept from joining MedImpact because
they required a more robust specialty pharmaceutical dispensing
platform.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has assigned the following ratings:

   MedImpact Holdings, Inc.

   -- Long-Term IDR 'BB-';

   MI OpCo Holdings, Inc.

   -- Long-Term IDR 'BB-';

   -- Senior secured term loan 'BB+/RR1'.


MEDITE CANCER: Appoints David Patterson as CFO
----------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc., held a
meeting on Nov. 12, 2016, whereby it appointed its Chief Executive
Officer, David E. Patterson, to the position of chief financial
officer, treasurer and secretary to serve on an interim basis until
a suitable permanent replacement is appointed.

                  About MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics

MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics Inc., is a Delaware registered company
consisting of wholly-own MEDITE GmbH a Germany-based company with
its subsidiaries.  On April 3, 2014, MEDITE was acquired by former
CytoCore, Inc. a biomolecular diagnostics company engaged in the
design, development, and commercialization of cost-effective cancer
screening systems and Biomarkers to assist in the early detection
of cancer.  By acquiring MEDITE the company changed from solely
research operations to an operating company with a well-developed
infrastructure, 78 employees in four countries, a distribution
network to about 70 countries worldwide, a well-known and
established brand name and a wide range of products for anatomic
pathology, histology and cytology laboratories.

Medite reported a net loss available to common stockholders of
$937,000 for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss
available to common stockholders of $808,000 for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $18.73 million in total
assets, $9.84 million in total liabilities and $8.89 million in
total stockholders' equity.

"At June 30, 2016, the Company's cash balance was $145,000 and its
operating losses for the year ended December 31, 2015 and for the
six months ended June 30, 2016 have used most of the Company's
liquid assets and the negative working capital has grown by
approximately $.9 million from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016.
Consequently, there is substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern.  The Company believes some portion of
the liabilities with employees will be settled in stock," the
Company said in its quarterly report for the period ended June 30,
2016.


MESOBLAST LIMITED: Reports Results for Q1 Ended Sept. 30, 2016
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mesoblast Limited provided a quarterly corporate update on its
operational highlights, including its key milestone achieved in its
acute graft versus host disease Phase 3 clinical trial. Mesoblast
also reported its consolidated financial results for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2016.

In line with previous guidance, the Company implemented operational
streamlining measures during the quarter while achieving, and
continuing to maintain progress towards, key milestones in its Tier
1 clinical programs.

In recognition of the Company's continued clinical achievements, it
was recently awarded the Frost & Sullivan Asia Pacific 2016 Cell
Therapy Company of the Year award.  The Frost & Sullivan awards
identify and honor the best-in-class companies that have
demonstrated excellence in their industry.

At Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had cash reserves of $60.4 million.
As previously announced, a fully discretionary equity facility has
been established for up to $A120 million/$US90 million over 36
months.

In order to absorb the incremental costs of the MPC-150-IM program
in advanced heart failure in FY17, the Company has executed its
planned operational streamlining and re-prioritization of projects.
Cash outflows for Q1 FY17 were $21.2 million, a reduction of 28%
from $29.4 million in the comparable FY16 quarter.  This was
achieved principally through reduced spend on commercial
manufacturing, deprioritized Tier 2 clinical projects and reduced
labor costs.

The Company reported a net loss attributable to the owners of
Mesoblast of $19.79 million on $395,000 of revenue for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss attributable to
the owners of Mesoblast of $13.16 million on $7.51 million of
revenue for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Mesoblast had $665.44 million in total
assets, $155.57 million in total liabilities and $509.87 million in
total equity.

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/KhbIGc

                      About Mesoblast Ltd.

Melbourne, Australia-based Mesoblast Limited (ASX:MSB; Nasdaq:MESO)
develops cell-based medicines.  The Company has leveraged its
proprietary technology platform, which is based on specialized
cells known as mesenchymal lineage adult stem cells, to establish a
broad portfolio of late-stage product candidates.  Mesoblast's
allogeneic, 'off-the-shelf' cell product candidates target advanced
stages of diseases with high, unmet medical needs including
cardiovascular diseases, immune-mediated and inflammatory
disorders, orthopedic disorders, and oncologic/hematologic
conditions.

Mesoblast reported a loss before income tax of $90.82 million for
the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to a loss before income
tax of $96.24 million for the year ended June 30, 2015.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, in Melbourne, Australia, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended June 30, 2016, citing that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


MILES APPLIANCE: JDM Properties Buying Assets for $300K
-------------------------------------------------------
Miles Appliance and Factory Discount Furniture Center, Inc., asks
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
to authorize the sale of assets outside the ordinary course of
business to JDM Properties of MS, LLC, for $300,000, subject to
overbid.

Prior to the Petition Date, on Jan. 26, 1990, the Debtor purchased
certain real property in the First Judicial District of Hinds
County, Mississippi, which is described in the 1990 Warranty Deed
which is recorded in the land records of Hinds County, First
Judicial District, at Book 3698, Page 408 ("Property).  Thereafter,
on March 25, 2011, the Debtor sold part of the Property to Dexter
Investments, Inc. by an Assumption Warranty Deed ("Dexter Deed").
The property described in the Dexter Deed is Parcel 10 ("Dexter
Property") in the tax plat.  The Debtor retained part of the
Property ("Miles Property") which is Parcel 11 in the attached tax
plat.

On Jan. 25, 1991, the Debtor entered into a Ground Lease ("AutoZone
Lease") with AutoZone, Inc.  The AutoZone Lease was renewed several
times, most recently on Jan. 13, 2003.

On July 25, 1991, the Debtor entered into a Sign Location Lease
("Lamar Lease") with The Lamar Cos.

The Dexter Deed provided that Dexter would assume and pay the
"indebtedness secured by the following Deeds of Trust" and then
goes on to describe all Deeds of Trust which encumbered the
Property, including Deeds of Trust held by Regions Bank/LMIW, I,
LLC and Small Business Capital Fund of MS, Inc., formerly known as
Minority Capital Fund of Mississippi, Inc., a Mississippi nonprofit
corporation.  Some or all of the Regions Deeds of Trust were
assigned to LMIW by an Assignment of Deed of Trust.  All of the 6
Minority Deeds of Trust were subordinated to the Regions Deeds of
Trust by Subordination Agreement.

On March 25, 2011, Regions, the Debtor, and Dexter all entered an
Assumption, Renewal, and Extension Agreement ("Assumption
Agreement").  The Assumption Agreement provided unequivocally that
Dexter would assume and pay all obligations related to the Regions
Deeds of Trust and the promissory notes related thereto and Regions
consented to this assumption.

Following the execution of the Assumption Agreement, the Debtor
ceased making any payments to Regions/LMIW.  The Debtor paid all
its ad valorem taxes on the Miles Property and continues to do so.
The Debtor continued to receive lease payments from AutoZone and
Lamar without any interference from Regions/LMIW.

Thereafter, in June of 2015, approximately 4 years after the
execution of the Assumption Agreement, the Debtor was made aware by
Regions/LMIW that Dexter had defaulted on the promissory note and
that Regions/LMIW was preparing to foreclose on the Dexter Property
and the Miles Property.

On July 23, 2015, in an effort to stop the foreclosure against the
Debtor by LMIW, the Debtor filed a Complaint against Dexter,
Regions and LMIW, SBCF, Mark Majid Ghorbani, individually, Family
Dollar Stores of Mississippi, Inc., and John Does 1-10 ("Chancery
Court Litigation").  Thereafter, on July 29, 2015, the Debtor
elected to seek protection pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Subsequent to the Petition Date, the Debtor amended its complaint
against Regions/LMIW in the Chancery Court Litigation and the case
is currently in the discovery stage.  Additionally, the Debtor
obtained Docket Entries of Default against Dexter, Ghorbani, Family
Dollar and SBCF in the Chancery Court Litigation.

On Nov. 4, 2015, following the Petition Date, LMIW foreclosed on
the Dexter Property.  Following the foreclosure of the Dexter
Property, the Debtor was informed that LMIW also foreclosed on
approximately 40 feet of the AutoZone building on the Miles
Property and the small parcel of property which is subject to the
Lamar Lease.

Prior to the Debtor's Chapter 11 filing, Linda Burleson, the
Debtor's sole stockholder and president, filed a Voluntary Chapter
7 Petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Mississippi. Ms. Burleson received a discharge on April
23, 2014, and the case was closed thereafter.  However, on Oct. 20,
2015, Eileen N. Schaffer, the Chapter 7 Trustee, filed a Motion to
Reopen Chapter 7 Case in order to administer undisclosed assets.
Specifically, the undisclosed assets are Ms. Burleson's interest in
the Debtor.  The Order Granting Motion to Reopen Chapter 7 Case was
entered by the Court on Oct. 21, 2015, and Eileen N. Shaffer was
reappointed as Chapter 7 Trustee.  On Oct. 27, 2015, the Trustee
filed a Notice of Assets and Request for Notice to Creditors and a
Notice to Creditors to File Proofs of Claim on Jan. 25, 2016 was
entered.

Given the expense and uncertainty of the outcome of the Chancery
Court Litigation and the issues related to the reopening of Ms.
Burleson's Chapter 7 Case, the Debtor has made the business
judgment decision that continuing to operate is not feasible, in
that it will result in increased costs, delays and uncertainty that
may, in the end, provide very little, if any, benefit to anyone
other than the professionals employed in the Debtor's case.

The Debtor's "Assets," for the purposes of the Motion, consist of
(a) the Miles Property and the AutoZone Lease and the Lamar Lease.
The Debtor received an offer from JDM Properties to purchase the
Assets in the amount of $300,000.  The Debtor, in the exercise of
its best business judgement, has made the business judgment
decision to accept the purchase offer from JDM Properties, subject
to any higher and/or better offers that the Debtor may receive on
or before the time the Court sets to object to the Motion.

In the event higher and/or better offers are to be submitted, these
offers must be submitted to counsel for the Debtor no later than
the time set by the Court for the filing of objections to the
Motion.  In the event higher and/or better offers are timely
submitted, that qualify by the Court will conduct an auction on the
date and time scheduled for a hearing to approve the Motion.  At
the conclusion of the auction, the Debtor will ask the Court to
approve the highest and/or best bidder as having submitted the
highest and/or best bid.  The Debtor will also ask the Court to
approve the Debtor's choice as the backup bidder for the Assets.

Immediately following the conclusion of the auction, the Court will
conduct a hearing in order to approve the highest and/or best offer
as the highest and/or best bid, and to approve the next highest
and/or best offer as the backup bidder.  The Debtor will also ask
that the Court approve the sale at that Sale Hearing.

LMIW has filed a Secured Claim in the amount of $700,662 pursuant
to Claim #2-1.  The Debtor currently disputes this Claim.  Further,
SBCF may hold a second Deed of Trust on the Miles Property, but the
Debtor disputes any claim SBCF may make.  Additionally, the Trustee
has an interest in the Assets by virtue of Ms. Burleson's Chapter 7
case.

Upon information and belief, there are no other valid liens, claims
and security interests in, to or upon the Assets.

The Debtor asks that the Court allows the execution such deed or
related documents which are reasonably necessary to consummate and
close the sale of the Assets.

The Debtor also asks that it be allowed to assume the AutoZone
Lease and assign it to JDM Properties.  The assumption and
assignment of the AutoZone Lease is a necessary component of the
sale of the Assets, provides substantial benefit to all parties and
is justified as an integral part of the sale of the Assets.

In order to consummate the sale of the Assets and the distributions
to LMIW and the Trustee, the Debtor will file the necessary
pleadings to approve the settlements and compromises with both
parties pursuant to Rule 9019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure.

           About Miles Appliance and Factory Discount Furniture
Center

Miles Appliance and Factory Discount Furniture Center, Inc., sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case No. 15-02339) on July
29, 2015.  The case is assigned to Judge Edward Ellington.  The
Debtor estimated assets in the range of $1 million to $10 million
and debt of $0 to $50,000.  The Debtor tapped John D. Moore, Esq.,
at John D. Moore, P.A., as counsel.  The petition was signed by
Linda Burleson, president.


MOUNSEF INTERNATIONAL: Hearing on Disclosures, Plan OK on Dec. 22
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Jacqueline P. Cox of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois has scheduled for Dec. 22, 2016, at
10:00 a.m., the combined hearing to consider the adequacy of the
Mounsef International, Inc.'s disclosure statement and confirmation
of the plan of reorganization.

Objections to the Disclosure Statement or to the confirmation of
the Plan must be filed by Dec. 19, 2016, which is also the last day
to file ballots accepting or rejecting the Plan.

The Debtor will file a ballot report by Dec. 21, 2016.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Oct. 27, 2016, the
Debtor filed with the Court an amended disclosure statement dated
Oct. 18, 2016, for its amended plan of reorganization dated Oct.
18, 2016.  Under the Plan, general unsecured creditors will receive
a distribution of 5% of their allowed claims.  Class 2 General
Unsecured Claims are impaired under the Plan and will receive a
total of $54,000 or about 5% of allowed claims without interest pro
rata in 20 quarterly installments starting on the first calendar
day of the next calendar quarter after the Effective Date of the
Plan.

                  About Mounsef International

Mounsef International, Inc., filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Ill. Case No. 15-35685) on Oct. 20, 2015.  The petition was
signed by George Mounsef, sole shareholder.  The Debtor is
represented by Robert R. Benjamin, Esq., at Golan & Christie, LLP.
The case is assigned to Judge Jacqueline P. Cox.  The Debtor
disclosed total assets at $99,104 and total liabilities at
$2.74 million.


NETA HATHAWAY: Trustee'S Sale of 19 LAACO Shares Approved
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Bruce T. Beesley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada authorized Timothy W. Nelson, Chapter 11 Trustee
of Neta Gallaway Hathaway, to sell the 19 remaining LAACO, Ltd.
shares currently in the possession of D.A. Davidson Cos. on the
open market in the ordinary course of business.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Nov. 16, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

The sale of assets is free and clear Of liens pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
Section 363 with the lien of the Internal Revenue Service to attach
to the sale proceeds.

D.A. Davidson will turnover the proceeds from the sale of the
assets, and the approximately $2,773 of the Estate's money market
fund balance to Trustee.

The 14-day stay imposed by F.R.B.P. 6004(h) is waived.

Neta Gallaway Hathaway sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Nev.
Case No. 12-52067) on Aug. 31, 2012.  Judge Bruce T. Beesley is
assigned to the case.


NEW JERSEY HEADWEAR: Dec. 1 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on Dec. 1, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of New Jersey Headwear Corp. aka Unionwear.

The meeting will be held at:

            United States Trustee's Office
            One Newark Center, 1085 Raymond Blvd.
            21st Floor, Room 2106
            Newark, NJ 07102

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

              About New Jersey Headwear Corp.

New Jersey Headwear Corp. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 16-31777), on November 14, 2016.  The Petition was
signed by Mitchell Cahn, president.  The case is assigned to Judge
Stacey L. Meisel.  The Debtor is represented by William S. Katchen,
Esq., at the Law Offices of William S. Katchen, LLC.  At the time
of filing, the Debtor had estimated $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities.



NEW STREAMWOOD: Unsecureds to Recover 1% Over 5 Years
-----------------------------------------------------
New Streamwood Lanes, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, a fifth
amended disclosure statement accompanying its fifth amended plan of
reorganization, dated Nov. 15, 2016, a full-text copy of which is
available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb14-20808-299.pdf

Under the Plan, the Debtor proposes to make a distribution to
general unsecured creditors totaling approximately $15,917. General
unsecured creditors will receive more under the Plan than they
would if the Debtor's assets were liquidated in Chapter 7. The
Debtor owes approximately $1,591,639 in general unsecured claims,
consisting of claims scheduled by the Debtor and claims filed by
creditors, including contested claims. The Plan provides for
payment of a 1% on general unsecured claims, over five years,
without interest.

Class I,  Governmental Unit Claims, is impaired under the Plan.
The IRS' unsecured priority claim in the amount of $317,661 will be
paid in monthly payment $4,970 based a 6-year period at 4%
interest, commencing on the first day of the month immediately
after the Effective date of the plan. IRS' unsecured general claim
in the amount of $297,564 will receive 1% of such portion of the
Claim as may be allowed. This claim shall receive monthly payments
over a 5-year period from the effective date of the Plan.

Class III,  Waterfall Olympic Master Fund Grantor Trust, Series II,
is impaired under the Plan. Waterfall Olympic Master Fund Grantor
Trust, Series II's secured portion of the claim in the amount of
$1,067,820 and unsecured portion in the amount of $1,452,180 will
be paid in monthly payment based on a 20-year 3-month amortization
at no interest, commencing on the first day of the month
immediately after the Effective date of the plan, for initial 6
year Waterfall will be paid in monthly payments of $6,500/month,
after 6 years $12,000 for continuing for 14 years and 3 month.

SBA's claim, which belongs to Class IV, will receive 1% of such
portion of the Claim as may be allowed. This class will receive
monthly payments over a 5-year period from the effective date of
the Plan.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
Debtor's regular operations of the business and cash on hand.

                About New Streamwood Lanes

New Streamwood Lanes, Inc., filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Ill. Case No. 14-20808) on June 2, 2014.  The petition was
signed by Terence Vaughn, president.  The Debtor is represented by
Ryan Kim, Esq., at Inseed Law PC.  The case is assigned to Judge
Benjamin Godgar.  The Debtor's estimated assets and liabilities at
$1 million to $10 million at the time of the filing.


NIKHIL BABU: Plan Confirmation Hearing To Be Continued on Dec. 21
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Nancy Hershey Lord of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York will continue on Dec. 21, 2016, at
3:30 p.m. the hearing to consider the confirmation of the second
amended liquidating plan filed by 399 Broadway Holdings, LLC, for
Nikhil Babu.

Objections to the confirmation of the Plan must be filed by Dec.
14, 2016, at 4:00 p.m.

Original ballots voting in favor of or against the Plan will be
submitted so as to be actually received by counsel for 399 Broadway
by Dec. 12, 2016, at 4:00 p.m.  That counsel will file a summary
and certification of acceptances or rejections of the Plan by Dec.
14, 2016.  The counsel for 399 Broadway is authorized, but not
directed, to file and serve on the U.S. Trustee, the Debtor's
counsel and all parties that have filed notices of appearance in
this case an affidavit and brief in support of confirmation on or
before Dec. 14, 2016.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 28, 2016, the
Court approved the second amended disclosure statement pertaining
to secured creditor 399 Broadway's second amended liquidating plan
for Nikhil Babu.  Hearing to consider the confirmation of the Plan
was scheduled for Nov. 2, 2016, at 11:00 a.m.

Nikhil Babu filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y. Case No. 14-45647) on Nov. 5, 2014.


NO PLACE LIKE HOME: Court Lifts Stay to Permit Arbitration
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge David S. Kennedy of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Tennessee, Western Division, granted the motion filed by David J.
Cocke, Esq. to lift the automatic stay imposed in the Chapter 11
case of No Place Like Home, Inc., to permit arbitration of claims
before an independent arbitrator.

The motion was filed by Mr. Cocke for and on behalf of 22 nurse
claimants who have previously entered into Independent Contractor
Agreements with No Place Like Home (NPLH), which contained, among
other things, an arbitration clause.

The claimants have previously filed individual arbitration demands
with the American Arbitration Association (AAA) against NPLH
regarding NPLH's compensation practices of its independent
contractors and the Fair Labor Standards Act(FLSA).  Once the
arbitration proceedings commenced, and before the the adjudicator
had the opportunity to determine the issues brought by the
claimants, NPLH filed its Chapter 11 petition on November 20,
2015.

On March 22, 2016, NPLH filed an "Objection to Claim 25, 26, 27,
28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44,
45, 46, 47, 48."  A "Response" was filed by the claimants on
September 6, 2016, asserting their right to recover damages accrued
during the three years immediately preceding the date they
individually filed their actions.

In filing their section 362(d)(1) motion, the claimants, in
essence, sought to compel arbitration of the objected-to claims;
NPLH objected to arbitration and, instead, sought to have the
bankruptcy court try on the merits the objections to claims as core
contested matters under 28 U.S.C. section 157(b)(2)(B) and Fed. R.
Bankr. P. 9014.

Jude Kennedy found that the claims at issue are purely statutory,
and deal with the asserted prepetition liability of NPLH, not
claims arising under the Bankruptcy Code.  The judge found that the
claims at issue arise strictly out of the FLSA and contract law,
that there is no underlying bankruptcy issue to be determined and,
therefore, there can be no inherent conflict between the Federal
Arbitration Act (FAA) and the Bankruptcy Code.

Judge Kennedy thus concluded that allowing arbitration would give
the appropriate arbitration forum a chance to determine complex
claims arising under non-bankruptcy law and efficiently accomplish
via indirection the judicial goal set forth in Fed. R. Bankr. P.
1001.  The judge thus granted the claimants' "Motion to Lift
Automatic Stay to Permit Arbitration of Claims."

A full-text copy of Judge Kennedy's October 27, 2016 memorandum and
order is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnwb15-31133-306.pdf

Claimants are represented by:

          David J. Cocke, Esq.
          EVANS | PETREE PC
          1000 Ridgeway Loop Road, Suite 2000
          Memphis, TN 38120
          Email: dcocke@evanspetree.com

            -- and --

          William B. Ryan, Esq.
          DONATI LAW, PLLC
          1545 Union Avenue
          Memphis, TN 38104
          Email: billy@donatilawfirm.com

Debtor - NPLH is represented by:

          E. Franklin Childress, Jr., Esq.
          M. Ruthie Hagan, Esq.
          Angie C. Davis
          BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC
          165 Madison Avenue, Suite 2000
          Memphis, TN 38103
          Email: fchildress@bakerdonelson.com
                 rhagan@bakerdonelson.com
                 angiedavis@bakerdonelson.com

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by:

          Laurie D. Pulliam, Esq.
          LDP LAW, LLC
          16901 Melford Blvd., Suite 123
          Bowie, MD 20715
          Email: lpulliam@ldpulliamlaw.com

            -- and --

          Leland Murphree
          CAYNARD COOPER & GALE, PC
          1901 6th Avenue North, Suite 2400
          Birmingham, AL 35203
          Email: lmurphree@maynardcooper.com

            -- and --

          Joan Dickerson Williams, Esq.
          Kevin C. Gray, Esq.
          MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, PC
          655 Galatin Street SW
          Huntsville, AL 35801
          Email: jdwilliams@maynardcooper.com
                 kgray@maynardcooper.com

U.S. Trustee for Region 8 is represented by:

          Karen P. Dennis, Esq.
          OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
          200 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 400
          Memphis, TN 38103
          Email: Karen.P.Dennis@usdoj.gov
  
                    About No Place Like Home

No Place Like Home, Inc., based in Collierville, Tenn., filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr W.D. Tenn. Case No. 15-31133) on Nov.
20, 2015.  Hon. David S. Kennedy presides over the case.  E.
Franklin Childress, Jr., Esq., and M. Ruthie Hagan, Esq., at Baker,
Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz P.C., serve as counsel to
the Debtor.  In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to
$10 million in assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by
John Flood, president.


NUSTAR ENERGY: Fitch Assigns 'BB' IDR & Rates Preferred Equity 'B+'
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned first-time ratings to NuStar Energy,
L.P.  NuStar's Issuer Default Rating is 'BB'/ Stable Outlook.
Additionally, Fitch has assigned an expected rating of
'B+/RR6(EXP)' to NuStar's issuance of perpetual preferreds.  The
new securities will rank junior to all existing senior unsecured
and subordinated debt and senior to common equity.  Proceeds from
the offering are to be used for general partnership purposes.

The perpetual preferreds are assigned 50% equity credit under
Fitch's hybrid criteria.  The Recovery Rating of 'RR6' for the
securities reflects Fitch's expectations for poor recovery
prospects in the event of a default.

NuStar is the parent of the operating subsidiaries NuStar
Logistics, L.P. (Logistics) and NuStar Pipe Line Operating
Partnership, L.P. (NPOP).  Senior unsecured debt at NuStar is
issued by Logistics and guaranteed by NuStar.  There is no debt
outstanding at NPOP.

Fitch rates Logistics as:

Logistics
   -- Long-Term IDR at 'BB';
   -- Senior unsecured debt at 'BB/RR4';
   -- Junior subordinated notes at 'B+/RR6'.

The Outlook for Logistics is Stable.  Approximately $3.2 billion of
debt at the combined partnerships is affected by the rating actions
(excluding the new perpetual preferreds).

                         KEY RATING DRIVERS

The 'BB' rating is supported by NuStar's strong fee-based and
regulated pipeline, and terminalling and storage assets, which
accounted for 100% of segment EBITDA for the nine months ending
Sept. 30, 2016.  The rating is also supported by NuStar's leverage
which remains in line with Fitch's target for the 'BB' rating.  For
the last 12 months (LTM) ending Sept. 30, 2016, leverage (as
defined by Fitch as adjusted debt/adjusted EBITDA) was 5.1x, up
slightly from 4.9x at the end of 2015.  Distribution coverage was
adequate at 1.1x for the LTM ending Sept. 30, 2016.

Ratings concerns include NuStar's liquidity given the partnership's
plan for significant spending in 2017.  Growth spending in 2016 is
expected to be in the range of $253 million to $273 million which
includes acquisition spending of $93 million. In 2017, growth
spending will ramp up and be in the range of $530 million to $550
million.

Fitch currently believes NuStar's liquidity, though constrained,
should be enough to support its spending plans.  Should liquidity
and capital market access further deteriorate, NuStar would need to
take steps to maintain adequate liquidity at or near current
levels, through capital spending or distribution cuts, to maintain
the rating and Stable Outlook.  Failure to do so would likely
result in Fitch taking a negative rating action.

Eagle Ford Impact: Lower crude oil production in the Eagle Ford has
been hurting crude oil pipeline throughput volumes, impacting the
partnership's profitability.  In 2016, management forecasts the
pipeline segment's EBITDA (before SG&A expenses) to be in the range
of $325 million to $345 million, against $355 million earned in
2015.  NuStar expects its storage segment to generate EBITDA
(before SG&A expenses) in the range of $330 million to $350 million
versus $335 million generated in 2015.  Fuels marketing is expected
to generate $5 million to $10 million versus $14 million in the
prior year.

Leverage: For the LTM ending Sept. 30, 2016, leverage (as defined
by Fitch as adjusted debt/adjusted EBITDA) was 5.1x, up slightly
from 4.9x at the end of 2015.  Leverage has been in line with
Fitch's forecast.  With expectations for lower EBITDA and
significant spending in 2016, Fitch expects year-end adjusted
leverage to be in the range of 5.0x-5.3x.

Distribution Coverage: NuStar's distribution coverage ratio was
1.1x for the LTM ending Sept. 30, 2016.  Distributions have been
held flat since 2011.  Even in the challenging environment in the
current year and with no growth to the distribution assumed, Fitch
expects distribution coverage at or slightly above for 1x in 2016.


Notching: Fitch has equalized the rating of the preferreds and the
junior subordinated notes based on the RRs which are both 'RR6',
indicating poor recovery in the event of default.  Should the
recovery improve for the junior subordinated notes, it is expected
that they would move up one notch to 'BB-' while the preferreds
would remain two notches below the IDR at 'B+'.  On the other hand,
if credit quality deteriorates at NuStar, the notching between the
IDR and the preferreds could expand to three notches.

                         KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for NuStar include:

   -- A modest reduction of EBITDA in 2016 as a result of lower
      Eagle Ford volumes, and growth of EBITDA resuming in 2017;
   -- Leverage increases modestly in 2016 as NuStar continues to
      spend during a time with reduced EBITDA;
   -- Capex spending for growth assumed to be $263 million in 2016

      and $540 million, at the midpoint of management's guidance
      for 2017 reduced spending in the two years that follow;
   -- Maintenance capex is forecasted to be $40 million in 2016
      and $45 million in 2017 with slightly elevated spending in
      the following two years;
   -- No distribution growth paid for common unit-holders.

                       RATING SENSITIVITIES

Positive: Future developments that may, individually or
collectively, lead to positive rating action include:

   -- While not expected in the near term, Fitch may take positive

      rating action if leverage falls below 4.5x for a sustained
      period of time.

Negative: Future developments that may, individually or
collectively, lead to a negative rating action include:

   -- Lack of access to capital markets;
   -- Failure to reduce growth capex if availability to fund
      growth is restricted or too heavily dependent on debt;
   -- Reduced liquidity;
   -- Deterioration of EBITDA and inability to meet growth
      expectations associated with capex spending;
   -- Significant increases in capital spending beyond Fitch's
      expectations which have negative consequences for the credit

      profile;
   -- Increased leverage beyond 6x for a sustained period of time.

                            LIQUIDITY

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Fitch estimates that NuStar has approximately
$322 million of total liquidity.  The partnership had $33 million
of cash and equivalents on the balance sheet. NuStar had $992
million drawn on its $1.5 billion revolver due 2019.  There was
also $16 million of letters of credit outstanding.  Availability to
draw on the revolver is restricted by the leverage covenant as
defined by the bank agreement which does not allow leverage to be
greater than 5x for covenant compliance.  However, if NuStar makes
acquisitions which exceed $50 million, the bank-defined leverage
ratio increases to 5.5x from 5.0x for two consecutive quarters.  As
of Sept. 30, 2015, bank-defined leverage was 4.6x.  Fitch estimates
NuStar could draw an additional $235 million before violating its
financial covenant.

The bank agreement definition of debt excludes debt proceeds held
in escrow for the future funding of construction, which was $43
million as of Sept. 30, 2016, and $403 million of junior
subordinated debt.  The bank-defined leverage calculation also
gives pro forma credit for EBITDA for material projects and
acquisitions.

NuStar also has access to a short-term line of credit with
uncommitted borrowing capacity of $40 million.  As of Sept. 30,
2016, there was $7 million of borrowings on these credit lines
leaving $32 million available for borrowing.

In June 2015, NuStar established a $125 million receivable
financing agreement which can be upsized to $200 million.  This
agreement has an initial termination date of June 15, 2018 with the
option to renew for an additional 364-day period thereafter. As of
Sept. 30, 2016, it had $103 million of accounts receivables in the
securitization program for NuStar Finance LLC.  Account receivables
held by NuStar Finance LLC are not available for claims of credits
of NuStar Energy LP.

NuStar has no near-term debt maturities.  There is $350 million in
notes due in 2018.  NuStar also has $402.5 million of junior
subordinated notes callable in 2018; however, they are not due
until 2043.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has assigned these ratings:

NuStar Energy, L.P.
   -- Long-Term IDR at 'BB';
   -- Perpetual Preferred Equity at 'B+/RR6(EXP)'.

Fitch has affirmed these ratings:

NuStar Logistics, L.P.
   -- Long-Term IDR at 'BB';
   -- Senior unsecured notes at 'BB'/RR4;
   -- Junior subordinated notes at 'B+'/RR6.

The Rating Outlook for both entities is Stable.



NUVERRA ENVIRONMENTAL: Moody's Withdraws Caa3 Corp Family Rating
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has withdrawn the ratings of Nuverra
Environmental Solutions, Inc. -- Caa3 Corporate Family Rating,
Ca-PD Probability of Default, C (LGD5) senior unsecured and SGL-4
Speculative Grade Liquidity.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's has withdrawn the ratings for its own business reasons.

Nuverra Environmental Solutions, Inc. provides full-cycle
environmental solutions to energy end markets, focusing on the
collection, transportation, treatment, recycling and disposal of
restricted solids, water and wastewater. The company's customers
are engaged in unconventional onshore energy exploration and
production in the US, namely the drilling, completion and ongoing
production of shale oil (the Bakken, Eagle Ford and Permian Basin
shale areas) and natural gas (the Marcellus, Haynesville and Utica
shale areas).



NUVIRA HOSPITALITY: Court Dismisses Ch. 11 Small Business Case
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Letitia Z. Paul of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, denied confirmation
of Nuvira Hospitality Inc.'s First Amended Plan of Reorganization,
dated October 3, 2016, and dismissed the case.

Ramesh Raj, Nuvira's president, purchased a 32-unit motel in
Surfside Beach, Texas, from Four Star or its principal, Abdul
Panjwani, during 2013 for $775,000.  Raj paid $175,000 in cash and
that on June 20, 2013, he executed a note, in the original
principal amount of $600,000, payable to Four Star.  The note
called for monthly payments of $7,122.11.  Raj transferred the
property to Nuvira shortly after he acquired the property.

After the sale was complete, Raj discovered that there were
problems with the septic system and the walls of the building.
Nuvira filed suit in state court against Panjwani and Four Star,
asserting claims, inter alia, for fraud, resulting from Nuvira's
purchase of the property.

Nuvira filed the petition bankruptcy case after Four Star posted
the property for foreclosure.  Four Star filed two proofs of claim.
Each of the two proofs of claim states a claim in the amount of
$575,703.89.  The first of the two proofs of claim asserted that
the claim is secured.  The second of the two proofs of claim
asserted that the claim is unsecured.

Nuvira objected to both proofs of claim.  Nuvira objected to Claim
No. 2, the claim filed as secured, on grounds it is subject to
offset based on Nuvira's state law claims against Four Star as set
forth in the lawsuit pending in state court.  Nuvira objected to
Claim No. 3 on grounds it is a duplicate of Claim No. 2.

Nuvira filed a Chapter 11 plan on September 26, 2016, the first
business day after 300 days after the date of filing of the
petition in the bankruptcy case.  Nuvira later filed a first
amended plan on October 3, 2016, and modified the plan on November
3, 2016.

Four Star objected to confirmation, on grounds the plan is not
feasible, is not fair and equitable as to Four Star, is not in the
best interests of creditors, and was not proposed in good faith.

Judge Paul concluded that Nuvira has not met its burden of proof to
demonstrate that the plan was filed in good faith.  The judge found
that the case involves a two party dispute between Nuvira and Four
Star with respect to the purchase price and condition of the motel,
that there is pending state court litigation between the parties to
resolve their dispute, and that Nuvira filed the plan on the last
day possible under the Bankruptcy Code.  Further, the judge found
that the plan provides for interest-only payments while Nuvira
continues its litigation against Four Star.

Judge Paul also found that the plan is not fair and equitable as to
the class of unsecured creditors, if the class rejects the plan,
because the Nuvira's equity holder retains his interest. The judge
concluded that Nuvira has not met its burden of proof on the
question of compliance with Sections 1129(a)(8) and 1129(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

Judge Paul also concluded that Nuvira has failed to meet its burden
of proof on the question of feasibility.  The judge found that
Nuvira's financial projections show a negative cash flow throughout
the time period for which projections were prepared.  The judge
noted that the projections do not take into consideration the
possibility that the claim of Four Star may be allowed in full,
such that payments of $7,122.11 per month would be required.  The
only other evidence presented on Nuvira's ability to fund the
payments required under the plan is Raj's testimony that he has
income of $250,000 per year, and can raise $80,000 on short notice,
but the judge found that Raj's testimony was not supported by
submission of Raj's personal financial statements, or anything
providing that Raj was undertaking the obligation of making such
payments.

In light of the Nuvira's failure to meet its burden of proof as to
several requirements for confirmation of the plan, Judge Paul
concluded that confirmation should be denied.

Further, Judge Paul also concluded that Nuvira has not demonstrated
by a preponderance of the evidence that it is more likely than not
that the court will confirm a plan within a reasonable period of
time.  The judge thus held that Nuvira's failure to obtain
confirmation of the plan in the small business case and failure to
obtain an extension is cause for dismissal of the case.

A full-text copy of Judge Paul's November 21, 2016 memorandum
opinion is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb15-80432-75.pdf

                    About Nuvira Hospitality

Nuvira Hospitality Inc., owner and operator of the Anchor Motel,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 15-80432) on
Nov. 30, 2015, and is represented by H Miles Cohn, Esq., at Crain,
Caton & James, PC.


OMINTO INC: Signs 5-Year Employment Agreement with CEO
------------------------------------------------------
Ominto, Inc., entered into an employment agreement with Michael
Hansen effective Nov. 17, 2016.  Mr. Hansen was appointed as chief
executive officer of Ominto by the Company's Board of Directors on
June 1, 2016.  The Employment Agreement supersedes the prior
employment agreement between the Company and Mr. Hansen, dated
Sept. 18, 2015.

Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Hansen will serve as the CEO
for an initial five year term, after which time, the Employment
Agreement shall continue on a year-to-year basis if not terminated
by the parties.  Pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement,
Mr. Hansen's base salary is $360,000 per year and Mr. Hansen will
be eligible to receive an annual incentive bonus of up to 100% of
the base salary, as determined by the Board in its sole discretion.
As soon as practicable after the effective date of the Employment
Agreement, Mr. Hansen will receive a grant of 500,000 shares of
restricted common stock which shall vest on the later of (i) Jan.
1, 2017; (ii) three business days after the listing of the
Company's common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market; or (iii) such
other date as may be approved by the Board.

The Company may pay Mr. Hansen additional salary from time to time,
and award bonuses in cash, stock or stock options or other property
and services.  In the event he is terminated without cause or
leaves the Company for good reason, Mr. Hansen is entitled to 12
months' of severance pay, or 24 months if such termination occurs
within 24 months following a change in control, subject to the
provisions in the Employment Agreement, and payable in accordance
with the Company's normal payroll.  Unless otherwise approved by
the Board, Mr. Hansen will not be entitled to accelerated vesting
or any other enhanced benefits with respect to any awards under any
Ominto Equity Plan, or any enhanced severance benefits under this
Agreement or otherwise, as a result of a change in control (or any
similar event).

            Adoption of Charters for Board Committees
                       and Code of Ethics

On Nov. 17, 2016, the Board adopted a Business Code of Ethics.  The
Code of Ethics is applicable to the Company and its affiliates'
directors, officers and employees, as well agents and other parties
acting on behalf, or for the benefit, of the Company and/or its
affiliates.  The Code of Ethics addresses such individuals' conduct
with respect to, among other things, conflicts of interests,
compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, compliance
with rules to promote full, fair, accurate, timely and
understandable disclosure, use of the Company's assets and
corporate opportunities, confidentiality, fair dealing, and
reporting and enforcement.

On Nov. 17, 2016, the Board approved and adopted a charter to
govern the Company's Audit and Finance Committee.  Pursuant to the
Audit Committee Charter, the Audit and Finance Committee will be
comprised of three or more independent directors.  Each member of
the Audit Committee will meet the independence requirements of The
NASDAQ Stock Market.  In addition to the enumerated
responsibilities of the Audit and Finance Committee in the Audit
Committee Charter, the primary function of the Audit Committee is
to assist the Board in its general oversight of the Company's
accounting and financial reporting processes, audits of its
financial statements, and internal control and audit functions.

On Nov. 17, 2016, the Board approved and adopted a charter to
govern the Company's Compensation Committee.  Pursuant to the
Compensation Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee will be
comprised of three or more directors who will be appointed by the
Board and subject to removal by the Board at any time.  At least
two members of the Compensation Committee will (i) be "non-employee
directors" within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) be "outside directors"
within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986.  In addition to the enumerated responsibilities of the
Compensation Committee in the Compensation Committee Charter, the
primary function of the Compensation Committee is to oversee the
compensation of the Company's executives, produce an annual report
on executive compensation for inclusion in the Company's proxy
statement, if and when required by applicable laws or regulations,
and advise the Board on the adoption of policies that govern the
Company's compensation programs.

On Nov. 17, 2016, the Board approved and adopted a charter to
govern the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  Pursuant
to the Governance Committee Charter, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee will be comprised of three or more directors
who will be appointed by the Board and subject to removal by the
Board at any time.  Each member of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee must meet the independence requirements
established by the Board and applicable laws, regulations, and
listing requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market. In addition to the
enumerated responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee in the Governance Committee Charter, the
function of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to
determine the slate of director nominees for election to the Board,
to identify and recommend candidates to fill vacancies occurring
between annual stockholder meetings, to review the Company's
policies and programs that relate to matters of corporate
responsibility, including public issues of significance to the
Company and its stockholders, and any other related matters
required by federal securities laws.

Each of the charters and Code of Ethics adopted on Nov. 17, 2016,
will be available in the near future on the Company's website at
www.ominto.com.

                         About Ominto

Ominto, Inc., was incorporated under the laws of the State of
Nevada on June 4, 1999, as Clamshell Enterprises, Inc., which name
was changed to MediaNet Group Technologies, Inc. in May 2003, then
to DubLi, Inc. on Sept. 25, 2012, and finally to Ominto, Inc. as of
July 1, 2015.  The DubLi Network was merged into the Company, as
its primary business in October 2009.

Ominto reported a net loss of $11.7 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2015, compared to a net loss of $1.34 million for the
year ended Sept. 30, 2014.

Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., in Boca Raton, Florida, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Sept. 30, 2015, noting that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency
that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


OPEXA THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $2 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
---------------------------------------------------------------
Opexa Therapeutics, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $2 million on $726,291 of revenue for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $2.79 million on $726,291
of revenue for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss of $6.27 million on $2.17 million of revenue compared to a
net loss of $9.64 million on $1.83 million of revenue for the same
period during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had $7.17 million in total
assets, $2.84 million in total liabilities and $4.33 million in
total stockholders' equity.

"Over the past several years, Opexa has dedicated itself to
developing therapies to treat patients with high unmet medical
needs, such as those with secondary progressive multiple
sclerosis," stated Neil K. Warma, president and chief executive
officer of Opexa.  "We are extremely disappointed that the Abili-T
trial did not meet the predefined endpoints, and we are evaluating
strategic alternatives for the Company in order to determine the
best path forward."

Cash and cash equivalents were $5,814,300 as of Sept. 30, 2016,
compared to $12,583,764 as of Dec. 31, 2015.  As of Sept. 30, 2016,
the Company had accounts payable and accrued expenses of
$2,121,043.

"Historically, we have financed our operations primarily through
the sale of debt and equity securities.  The accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2016 have been prepared assuming that Opexa will
continue as a going concern, meaning Opexa will continue in
operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize
assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of
operations.  As of September 30, 2016, we had cash and cash
equivalents of $5.8 million as well as accounts payable and accrued
expenses aggregating $2.1 million.  While we recognize revenue
related to the $5 million and $3 million payments from Merck
received in February 2013 and March 2015 in connection with the
Option and License Agreement and the Amendment over the exclusive
option period based on the expected completion term of the Abili-T
clinical trial, we do not currently generate any commercial
revenues resulting in cash receipts, nor do we expect to generate
revenues during the remainder of 2016 resulting in cash receipts.
Our burn rate during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was
approximately $765,000 per month, thereby creating substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Additionally, costs associated with completing the Abili-T trial
and implementing restructuring of our work force may result in an
increase in the monthly operating cash burn during the remainder of
2016.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

"We implemented a reduction in workforce of 40% of our then 20
full-time employees, announced on November 2, 2016, while we
reevaluate our programs and various strategic alternatives in light
of the disappointing Abili-T study data.  We anticipate further
restructuring by the end of 2016 to conserve cash resources.  We
believe that we have sufficient liquidity to support our current
activities in winding down the Abili-T trial and for general
operations to sustain the Company and support such activities into
the first quarter of 2017.  However, if our projections prove to be
inaccurate, or if we encounter additional costs to wind down the
trial or to sustain our operations, or if we incur other costs such
as those associated with pursuing further research and development,
we would need to raise additional capital to continue our
operations.

"On March 25, 2016, we entered into a new Sales Agreement with IFS
Securities, Inc. (doing business as Brinson Patrick, a division of
IFS Securities, Inc.) as sales agent, pursuant to which we can
offer and sell shares of our common stock from time to time
depending upon market demand, in transactions deemed to be an "at
the market" offering.  We registered up to 1,000,000 shares of
common stock for potential sale under the new ATM facility. From
August 17 through September 13, 2016, we sold an aggregate of
66,184 shares of our common stock under our ATM facility.  We
generated gross and net proceeds, including amortization of
deferred offering costs, of $293,345 and $276,912, respectively,
with the average share price ranging from $4.12 to $4.73 per share.
We will need to keep current our shelf registration statement and
the offering prospectus relating to the ATM facility in order to
use the program to sell shares of common stock in the future.

"If we determine to continue the development of one or more of our
programs, we expect to continue to incur significant expenses and
increasing losses for at least the next several years.  We would
need to raise additional capital in order to conduct further
development.  Given the disappointing results of our Abili-T trial,
we believe our ability to issue equity securities or obtain debt
financing in the future on favorable terms, or at all, has been
substantially impaired.

"We continue to explore potential opportunities and alternatives to
obtain the additional resources that will be necessary to support
our ongoing operations through and beyond the next 12 months,
including raising additional capital through either private or
public equity or debt financing as well as using our ATM facility
and cutting expenses where possible.  However, in light of the
Abili-T study results, there can be no assurance that we will be
able to secure additional funds or, if such funds are available,
that the terms or conditions would be acceptable to us. If we are
unable to obtain additional funding to support our current or
proposed activities and operations, we may not be able to continue
our operations as proposed, which may require us to suspend or
terminate any ongoing development activities, modify our business
plan, curtail various aspects of our operations, cease operations
or seek relief under applicable bankruptcy laws. In such event, our
shareholders may lose a substantial portion or even all of their
investment.

"If the disappointing results of the Abili-T study result in Merck
Serono not exercising its Option to acquire the exclusive,
worldwide (excluding Japan) license of our Tcelna program for MS,
or if we are not successful in attracting another partner, we may
not be able to complete development of or commercialize any product
candidate.  In such event, our ability to generate revenues and
achieve or sustain profitability would be significantly hindered
and we may not be able to continue operations as proposed,
requiring us to modify our business plan, curtail various aspects
of our operations or cease operations.  In such event, our
shareholders may lose a substantial portion or even all of their
investment.

"We do not maintain any external lines of credit or have any
sources of debt or equity capital committed for funding, other than
our ATM facility.  Should we need any additional capital in the
future beyond the ATM facility, management will be reliant upon
"best efforts" debt or equity financings.  As our prospects for
funding, if any, develop, we will assess our business plan and make
adjustments accordingly.  Although we have successfully funded our
operations to date by attracting additional investors in our equity
and debt securities, given the disappointing results of our Abili-T
study, there is no assurance that our capital raising efforts will
be able to attract additional capital necessary for future
operations," the Company disclosed in the filing.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/Hr39Ex

                         About Opexa

Opexa Therapeutics, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company developing
a personalized immunotherapy with the potential to treat major
illnesses, including multiple sclerosis (MS) as well as other
autoimmune diseases such as neuromyelitis optica (NMO).  These
therapies are based on its proprietary T-cell technology.  The
Company's mission is to lead the field of Precision Immunotherapy
by aligning the interests of patients, employees and shareholders.

Opexa reported a net loss of $12.02 million in 2015 following a net
loss of $15.05 million in 2014.

In its financial report filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the quarterly period Ended June 30, 2016, the
Company said that as of June 30, 2016, it had cash and cash
equivalents of $7.8 million.  While the Company recognizes revenue
related to the $5 million and $3 million payments from Merck
received in February 2013 and March 2015 in connection with the
Option and License Agreement and the Amendment over the exclusive
option period based on the expected completion term of the
Company's ongoing Phase IIb clinical trial -- Abili-T -- of
Tcelna(R) in patients with Secondary Progressive MS, the Company
does not currently generate any commercial revenues resulting in
cash receipts, nor does it expect to generate revenues during the
remainder of 2016 resulting in cash receipts.  The Company's burn
rate during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately
$763,000 per month, thereby creating substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company
warned that costs associated with completing the ongoing Abili-T
trial may result in an increase in the monthly operating cash burn
during the remainder of 2016.


ORLEANS HOMEBUILDERS: Court Says Plan Bars Association's Claims
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Kevin J. Carey of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware granted, in part, reorganized Orleans
Homebuilders, Inc., et al.'s "Motion to Enforce Plan Injunction and
Related Provisions and Requesting Award of Sanctions Against Cooks
Bridge Condominium Association, Inc.

The motion was granted to enjoin the Association's state court
litigation, but deferred as to the request for sanctions.

In February 2013, the Association filed an action in New Jersey
state court against the reorganized debtors and related
individuals, among other parties, for alleged construction defects
in certain common elements of the Cooks Bridge Condominium that
were completed pre-petition.

The reorganized debtors filed a motion seeking an order from the
court that:

     (i)  requires the Association to discontinue prosecution of
          the state court litigation, and

     (ii) finding the Association in civil contempt and requiring
          it to pay sanctions, including, but not limited to, the  
        
          reorganized debtors' costs and attorneys' fees incurred
          in defending against the state court litigation and
          pursuing the injunction motion.

The debtors argued that the discharge and injunction provisions in
the Debtors' Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization bars
creditors, such as the Association, from "commencing or continuing
in any manner" any litigation against the reorganized debtors
arising from pre-petition claims.

The Association, however, argued that another provision of the Plan
provides that certain agreements relating to the Cooks Bridge
Condominium development survived bankruptcy; thereby allowing the
Association's claims to be pursued post-petition.  Section 1.163 of
the Plan included the Cooks Bridge Development in the list of
"Revesting Developments."  Relying on applicable regulations
implementing the New Jersey Development Act, the Association argued
that the Plan's discharge injunction does not bar it from filing
claims post-confirmation to enforce the common area warranty, which
-- as part of the developer's Public Offering Statement -- is
deemed assumed by the Plan's Revesting Provision.

Judge Carey agreed with the reorganized debtors that the
Association's reading of the Revesting Provision is too broad.  The
judge explained that the Revesting Provision applies to agreements
(or ordinances, permits or approvals) between the debtors and
governmental or quasi-governmental units (or utilities), that "are
necessary, appropriate, beneficial, or required to permit the
continued construction and development of any of the Revesting
Development..."  Judge Carey held that the Revesting Provisino
cannot be read so broadly to incorporate agreements within
agreements that grant rights to non-governmental third parties.

The reorganized debtors also argued that the Plan's Exculpation
provision bars the Association's claims against the individual
defendants who were appointed by the debtor to serve as the
Association's initial Board of Trustees.

Judge Carey agreed with the debtors that the individual defendants
are "Released Parties" when acting -- at the debtor's direction --
as the Board of the Association pre-transition.

In summary, Judge Carey concluded that the claims in the
Association's complaint against the reorganized debtors and certain
of the debtors' employees are barred by the Discharge and
Injunction provision and the Exculpation provision of the debtors'
Modified Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization.  The judge
will schedule a further hearing to consider the reorganized
debtors' request for sanctions.

A full-text copy of Judge Carey's November 21, 2016 opinion is
available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb10-10684-4645.pdf

                     About Orleans Homebuilders

Orleans Homebuilders, Inc. -- aka FPA Corporation, OHB, Parker &
Lancaster, Masterpiece Homes, Realen Homes and Orleans --
develops, builds and markets high-quality single-family homes,
townhouses and condominiums.  From its headquarters in suburban
Philadelphia, the Company serves a broad customer base including
first-time, move-up, luxury, empty-nester and active adult
homebuyers.  The Company currently operates in these 11 distinct
markets: Southeastern Pennsylvania; Central and Southern New
Jersey; Orange County, New York; Charlotte, Raleigh and
Greensboro, North Carolina; Richmond and Tidewater, Virginia;
Chicago, Illinois; and Orlando, Florida.  The Company's Charlotte,
North Carolina operations also include adjacent counties in South
Carolina.  Orleans Homebuilders employs approximately 300 people.

The Company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on March 1,
2010 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 10-10684).  Cahill Gordon & Reindell
LLP is the Debtor's bankruptcy and restructuring counsel.  Curtis
S. Miller, Esq., and Robert J. Dehney, Esq., at Morris, Nichols,
Arsht & Tunnell, are the Debtor's Delaware and restructuring
counsel.  Blank Rome LLP is the Debtor's special corporate
counsel.  Garden City Group Inc. is the Debtor's claims and notice
agent.  Gerard S. Catalanello, Esq., and James J. Vincequerra,
Esq., at Duane Morris LLP, in New York; Lawrence J. Kotler, at
Duane Morris LLP, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Richard W.
Riley, Esq., and Sommer L. Ross, Esq., at Duane Morris LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware, serve as counsel to the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.

The Company estimated assets and debts at $100 million to
$500 million as of the Petition Date.

Orleans Homebuilders, Inc., in February 2011 completed its
financial reorganization and emerged from Chapter 11 protection as
a newly reorganized company.  Orleans emerged with $160 million in
new financing, including a $30 million revolving credit facility.


PARKLANDS OFFICE: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 10
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of
Parklands Office Park, LLC, at a hearing on January 10, at 11:00
a.m.

The hearing will be held at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Room 326,
915 Lafayette Boulevard, Bridgeport, Connecticut.

The court on November 8 approved the company's disclosure
statement, allowing it to start soliciting votes from creditors.  

The order set a January 3 deadline for creditors to cast their
votes and file their objections.

Under the restructuring plan, Class 2 general unsecured creditors
will get 100% of their allowed claims.  These creditors, which hold
$211,176 in claims, will be paid their pro rata share of monthly
payments of $10,000 commencing on the 20th of the first month
following the sale to LCB with an estimated commencement date of
Feb. 20, 2017.

Any remaining balances on allowed claims will be paid in full no
later than June 30, 2019, according to court filings.  

                   About Parklands Office Park

Parklands Office Park, LLC, a single asset real estate company,
owns and operates real property located in Darien, Connecticut
consisting of two office buildings.

The Debtor sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No.
16-50425) on March 29, 2016.  The case is assigned to Judge Ann M.
Nevins.  The Debtor tapped James Berman, Esq., at Zeisler & Zeisler
P.C., as counsel.  The Debtor estimated assets and debt at $10
million to $50 million.


PENNGOOD LLC: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Dec. 21
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia is set to
hold a hearing on December 21, at 10:30 a.m., to consider approval
of the disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 plan of
Penngood LLC.

The hearing will take place at the U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 1,
333 Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC.  

The company filed its proposed plan and disclosure statement on
November 4, 2016.  

Penngood is represented by:

     Richard G. Hall, Esq.
     7369 McWhorter Place, Suite 412
     Annandale, VA 22003
     Tel: (703) 256-7159
     Email: richard@rghalllaw.us

             About Penngood LLC

Headquartered in Washington, DC, Penngood LLC dba Penn Good and
Associates LLP derives its income primarily from government
contracts, or from work done for companies who are themselves
working on government contracts and has several promising
opportunities to acquire new accounts and to expand its business in
this area.  It filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D.C. Case No. 16-00051) on Feb. 15, 2016, listing $1.85 million in
total assets and $4.42 million in total liabilities.  The petition
was signed by Clyde H. Penn Jr., owner.


PETROLIA ENERGY: Incurs $597,000 Net Loss in Third Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------
Petrolia Energy Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $596,550 on $21,863 of total revenue for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2016, compared with a net loss of $202,640 on $34,689 of
total revenue for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss of $1.30 million on $277,156 of total revenue compared
with a net loss of $1.33 million on $162,848 of total revenue for
the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Petrolia Energy had $13.12 million in total
assets, $5.77 million in total liabilities and $7.35 million in
total stockholders' equity.

"The Company continues to operate at a negative cash flow of
approximately $50,000 per month and our auditors have raised a
going concern issue in their latest audit report.  Management is
pursuing several initiatives to secure funding to increase
production at both the SUDS and Twin Lakes fields which together
with an increase in the price of crude oil may allow the Company to
become cash flow positive, funding permitting, which may not be
available on favorable terms, if at all.  The total amount required
by the Company to accomplish this objective is approximately
$250,000, however, in the event we are unable to raise additional
funding, these initiatives may not actually occur.

"The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations.  These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  We plan to generate profits by
drilling productive oil or gas wells.  However, we will need to
raise additional funds to drill new wells through the sale of our
securities, through loans from third parties or from third parties
willing to pay our share of drilling and completing the wells. We
do not have any commitments or arrangements from any person to
provide us with any additional capital.  If additional financing is
not available when needed, we may need to cease operations.  There
can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising the
capital needed to drill oil or gas wells nor that any such
additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or
at all.  Any wells which we may drill may not be productive of oil
or gas.  Management believes that actions presently being taken to
obtain additional funding provide the opportunity for the Company
to continue as a going concern.  The accompanying financial
statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as
a going concern; no adjustments to the financial statements have
been made to account for this uncertainty."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/OJ5Oeb

              About Petrolia Energy Corporation

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Petrolia Energy Corporation,
formerly known as Rockdale Resources Corporation.  With over 80
years of operational and management experience throughout the
energy industry, the Company explores oil and gas development
opportunities.  Petrolia Energy's core focus is on the utilization
of new technology as well as the implementation of its own
proprietary technologies in order to improve the recoverability of
existing oil fields.

Rockdale incurred a net loss of $1.85 million in 2015, following a
net loss of $1.67 million in 2014.

MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015, noting that the Company has incurred losses
from operation since inception. This factor raises substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


PFO GLOBAL: Incurs $1.18 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------
PFO Global, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on Nov. 14, 2016, its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended Sept. 30, 2016.

PFO Global was unable file the Quarterly Report in a timely manner
without unreasonable effort and expense.  As previously disclosed
in its Current Report on Form 8-K filed Sept. 16, 2016, the Company
recently experienced a management transition, including the
appointment of a new principal financial officer.  As a result,
despite diligent efforts, the Company requires additional time to
complete the Third Quarter Report.

The Company a net loss of $1.18 million on $789,530 of sales for
the three months ended Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of
$3.84 million on $710,050 of sales for the three months ended Sept.
30, 2015.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss of $4.73 million on $2.79 million of sales compared to a
net loss of $10.97 million on $2.16 million of sales for the same
period during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, PFO Global had $1.75 million in total assets,
$30.96 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $29.21 million.

On June 30, 2015, Pro Fit Optix Holding Company, LLC entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger with the Company, formerly Energy
Telecom, Inc. and PFO Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company.  Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on the Effective
Date, the Company completed the acquisition of Holding by means of
a merger of Merger Sub with and into Holding, such that Holding
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Immediately
following the Merger, the former PFO Global, Inc. equity holders
owned approximately 8% of the outstanding shares of the Company's
common stock.

Subsequent to the Merger, the Company has sold an aggregate of
approximately $10.23 million in principal amount of Original issue
discount senior secured convertible debentures and warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 6,780,000 shares of common stock, and
incurred debt issuance and debt discount costs of $1.3 million.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had cash of $130,413.  As
reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements, the Company had a net loss of $4,735,782 and net cash
and cash equivalents used in operations of approximately $3.01
million for the nine month period ended Sept. 30, 2016.  The
Company has a working capital deficit of approximately $23 million
and stockholders' deficit of approximately $29 million as of
Sept. 30, 2016.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/4H5SrH

                       About PFO Global

PFO Global, Inc., is an innovative manufacturer and commercial
provider of advanced prescription lenses, finished eyewear and
vision technologies targeted towards the global optometrists'
marketplace.  The Company's uniquely interactive manufacturing,
fulfillment and proprietary online ordering systems combine with
its eyewear lens product lines, are intended to meet the needs of a
broad array of eyewear markets, from the offices of independent eye
care professional to U.S. healthcare entitlement programs, such as
Medicaid and Medicare.

PFO Global reported a net loss of $15.66 million in 2015 following
a net loss of $8.45 million in 2014.

During the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, the Company raised $6.8
million in debt, net of repayments and issuance costs.  The Company
believes that its current cash on hand will not be sufficient to
fund its projected operating requirements.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


PHOTOMEDEX INC: Incurs $7.41 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Photomedex, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $7.41
million on $7.25 million of revenues for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $5.11 million on $17.99
million of revenues for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss of $14.65 million on $29.73 million of revenues compared
to a net loss of $9.06 million on $58.59 million of revenues for
the same period during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Photomedex had $18.88 million in total
assets, $20.27 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $1.39 million.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had an accumulated deficit of
$117,023,000 and shareholders deficit of $1,392,000.  To date, the
Company has dedicated most of its financial resources to sales and
marketing, general and administrative expenses and research and
development.

Cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2016 were $1,636,000
including restricted cash of $342,000.  The Company has
historically financed its activities with cash from operations, the
private placement of equity and debt securities, borrowings under
lines of credit and, in the most recent periods with sale of
certain assets and business units.  The Company will be required to
obtain additional liquidity resources in order to support its
operations.  The Company is addressing its liquidity needs by
seeking additional funding from lenders as well as selling certain
of its product lines to a third party.  There are no assurances,
however, that the Company will be able to obtain an adequate level
of financial resources required for the short and long-term support
of its operations.  In light of the Company's recent operating
losses and negative cash flows, the termination of a pending merger
agreement and the uncertainty of completing further sales of its
product lines, there is no assurance that the Company will be able
to continue as a going concern.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/lSQcbB

                        About PhotoMedex

PhotoMedex, Inc., is a global health products and services company
providing integrated disease management and aesthetic solutions to
dermatologists, professional aestheticians, ophthalmologists,
optometrists, consumers and patients.  The Company provides
proprietary products and services that address skin conditions
including psoriasis, vitiligo, acne, actinic keratosis, photo
damage and unwanted hair, as well as fixed-site laser vision
correction services at our LasikPlus(R) vision centers.

Photomedex reported a net loss of $34.6 million on $75.9 million of
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared with a net loss
of $121 million on $133 million of revenues for the year ended Dec.
31, 2014.


PRELUDE INVESTMENT: Proposes to Use JP Morgan Chase Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Prelude Investment LLC resubmits its proposal to the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to use the
collected rents from the commercial warehouse located at 9906 Lower
Azusa Road, El, California, which is subject to a first deed of
trust secured by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

The Debtor's source of income is the rents collected from leasing
its warehouse, office and parking space to its tenant Tile King
Group USA, Inc., at $6,880 per month, and to Servpro at $3,800 and
$1,800 per month, for office and parking space, respectively.

The Debtor intends to use the $12,480 monthly rental income from
the Azusa Property only for the payment of property insurance,
which is paid annually in April in the amount of $3,680, broken
down to monthly payments at $307 per month, and mortgage payments
of approximately $10,700 per month to JP Morgan Chase.  

The Debtor contends that it is not using cash collateral, but a new
loan from Reales Investment, LLC, to fund its Chapter 11 Plan.  The
new loan balance of $509,284 will be received as a lump sum from
Reales Investment.

Reales Investment is the gift contributor for the Debtor's
administrative fees, an investor which seeks to inject funds into
the Debtor's plan of reorganization to pay off JP Morgan Chase's
balloon payment.

The Debtor relates that as of Oct. 26, 2016, the Debtor's bank
account balance shows $68,053 which includes November's rent
deposit.  The Debtor further relates that it has sufficient funds
available because it has not been making post-petition mortgage
payments.

Postpetition, JP Morgan Chase's loan reached maturity on July 1,
2016, and a balloon payment of the principal balance of $954,460
became due effective Aug. 1, 2016, after which the default interest
rate applied.

The Debtor proposes to make a lump sum payment of approximately
$49,476 to JP Morgan Chase, upon obtaining the Court's authority to
use cash collateral, which payment consists of the missed
post-petition payments for August through November 2016, as well as
the missed July 2016 payment at the non-default interest rate of
$6,676.

Based on the appraisal report of the Azusa Property, the Debtor
asserts that JP Morgan Chase's interest in the cash collateral is
adequately protected because the Azusa Property has $1,074,027 of
equity to protect JP Morgan Chase's interest.  The Debtor further
asserts that its proposed use of cash collateral will not only pay
down the mortgage and provide insurance coverage for the interest
of JP Morgan Chase, but it will also significantly compensate JP
Morgan Chase at the default interest rate.

The Debtor submits that it has sufficient funds to pay the default
interest rate payments to JP Morgan Chase and pay its property
taxes, however, it proposes to set up a separate cash collateral
account for the Azusa Property and provide monthly operating
reports to provide the appropriate level of adequate protection for
JP Morgan Chase's interests in the cash collateral generated by the
Azusa Property.

The Debtor further submits that its continued operations and the
concomitant use of the cash collateral will preserve the value of
the cash collateral and of the Azusa Property which will be
beneficial to the Debtor's estate and creditors, and as such, the
Debtor's success in reorganization depends upon its proposed use of
the cash collateral.  

The Debtor contends that it will suffer irreparable harm without
the benefit afforded by the use of cash collateral, as the Debtor's
ability to maintain its business operations, preserve the
going-concern value of its business and assets, and provide an
opportunity for the Debtor to reorganize its business operations
will be hindered.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated November 22, 2016,
is available at https://is.gd/7yuC30

                             About Prelude Investment

Prelude Investment LLC filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 09-25621) on June 19, 2009.  The petition was signed
by Jing Gong, managing member.  The Debtor is represented by Robert
Berke, Esq., at Berke Law Offices.  The case is assigned to Judge
Barry Russel.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at
$1,000,001 to $10,000,000 at the time of the filing.


PRODUCTION RESOURCE: S&P Corrects Rating on $400MM Notes to 'C'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings services corrected its issue-level rating on
Production Resource Group's (PRG) $400 million 8.875% senior
unsecured notes due in 2019 to 'C' from 'CC'.  The recovery rating
on the notes remains '6', indicating S&P's expectation of
negligible (0%-10%) recovery of principal in the event of a
default.  A '6' recovery rating accompanies an issue-level rating
that is two notches lower than the corporate credit rating, which
in this case is 'CCC-'.  On Feb. 2, 2016, S&P incorrectly lowered
the rating on the notes by only one notch to 'CC'.

The 'CCC-' corporate credit rating on PRG remains unchanged.  The
'CCC+' issue-level rating and '1' recovery rating on PRG's
$200 million asset-based revolving facility and the 'CCC'
issue-level rating and '2' recovery rating on PRG's second-lien
term loan also remain unchanged.

RATINGS LIST

Production Resource Group Inc.
Corporate Credit Rating        CCC-/Negative/--   

Rating Corrected; Recovery Rating Unchanged
                                To                From
Senior Unsecured               C                 CC
  Recovery Rating               6                 6



PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY: Cosmic Holds 54.7% Stake as of Nov. 7
-------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Cosmic Forward Limited disclosed that as of Nov. 7,
2016, it beneficially owns 1,983,342 shares of common stock of
Professional Diversity Network, Inc., representing approximately
54.7% of the Company's outstanding Shares (based upon the 3,622,851
Shares outstanding as of Nov. 9, 2016, as reported in the Issuer's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Nov. 14,
2016).

On Nov. 7, 2016, Cosmic Forward purchased from the Company
1,777,417 newly issued Shares in accordance with the Purchase
Agreement for a per-share price of $9.60 and aggregate
consideration of $17,063,203.  On the same day, Cosmic purchased
205,925 Shares directly from Matthew Proman for the Per Share Price
and aggregate consideration of $1,976,880.  The purchases were
funded by each of the shareholders of Cosmic pursuant to an equity
commitment letter, dated as of Aug. 12, 2016, entered by and among
Cosmic and each of its shareholders, pursuant to which those
shareholders agreed to fund the aggregate amount required to
purchase 51% of the outstanding Shares on a fully-diluted basis.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                    https://is.gd/LRJ9vR

                 About Professional Diversity

Professional Diversity Network, Inc., is a dynamic operator of
professional networks with a focus on diversity.  The Company
serves a variety of such communities, including Women,
Hispanic-Americans, African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Disabled,
Military Professionals, and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender
(LGBT).  The Company's goal is (i) to assist its registered users
and members in their efforts to connect with like-minded
individuals, identify career opportunities within the network and
(ii) connect members with prospective employers while helping the
employers address their workforce diversity needs.  

As of June 30, 2016, Professional Diversity had $37.4 million in
total assets, $16.5 million in total liabilities and $20.9
million in total stockholders' equity.

The Company reported a net loss of $35.8 million in 2015,
following
a net loss of $3.65 million in 2014.


PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY: Reports $1.27 Million Net Loss for Q3
-------------------------------------------------------------
Professional Diversity Network, Inc., filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $1.27 million on $6.36 million of total revenues for
the three months ended Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of
$31.80 million on $9.22 million of total revenues for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss of $3.51 million on $20.55 million of total revenues
compared to a net loss of $34.43 million on $30.01 million of total
revenues for the same period a year ago.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Professional Diversity had $36.45 million in
total assets, $18.38 million in total liabilities and $18.06
million in total stockholders' equity.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/MAVNU9

                 About Professional Diversity

Professional Diversity Network, Inc., is a dynamic operator of
professional networks with a focus on diversity.  The Company
serves a variety of such communities, including Women,
Hispanic-Americans, African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Disabled,
Military Professionals, and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender
(LGBT).  The Company's goal is (i) to assist its registered users
and members in their efforts to connect with like-minded
individuals, identify career opportunities within the network and
(ii) connect members with prospective employers while helping the
employers address their workforce diversity needs.  

The Company reported a net loss of $35.8 million in 2015 following
a net loss of $3.65 million in 2014.


PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY: White Winston Owns 9.9% Stake as of Nov. 7
------------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, White Winston Select Asset Funds, LLC, Todd M. Enright,
Mark Blundell and Donald Feagan disclosed that as of Nov. 7, 2016,
they beneficially own 371,445 shares of common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, of Professional Diversity Network, Inc., which
represents 9.9 percent of the Company's outstanding capital stock
based upon the 3,622,851 shares of the Company's Common Stock
stated to be outstanding as of Nov. 9, 2016, in the Company's Form
10-Q filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Nov. 14,
2016.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for
free at https://is.gd/VZ7g6j

                  About Professional Diversity

Professional Diversity Network, Inc., is a dynamic operator of
professional networks with a focus on diversity.  The Company
serves a variety of such communities, including Women,
Hispanic-Americans, African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Disabled,
Military Professionals, and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender
(LGBT).  The Company's goal is (i) to assist its registered users
and members in their efforts to connect with like-minded
individuals, identify career opportunities within the network and
(ii) connect members with prospective employers while helping the
employers address their workforce diversity needs.  

As of June 30, 2016, Professional Diversity had $37.4 million in
total assets, $16.5 million in total liabilities and $20.9
million in total stockholders' equity.

The Company reported a net loss of $35.8 million in 2015,
following
a net loss of $3.65 million in 2014.


PYKKONEN CAPITAL: Hearing on Plan Confirmation Set for Dec. 6
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado is set to
hold a hearing on December 6, at 11:00 a.m., to consider
confirmation of the Chapter 11 plan of Pykkonen Capital LLC.

The hearing will take place at the U.S. Custom House, Courtroom D,
721 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.  The deadline for creditors to
cast their votes is December 2.

The plan provides for the reorganization of the Debtor and for
distribution of the net proceeds from the sale of Echo Mountain Ski
Resort.

Under the plan, Class 3 unsecured creditors will receive pro rata
distribution of the remaining sale proceeds after payment of claims
of other creditors.  The amount to be distributed to Class 3
creditors is $1,288,168 less any amount required to pay
administrative claims.

The total amount of unsecured claims in Class 3 is $2,294,348,
which includes the claim of Keith and Nora Pykkonen in the amount
of $1,432,088 for personal loans made to the Debtor since its
inception in 2011.

Pursuant to the plan, the Pykkonens agree to waive distribution on
account of their claim until all other Class 3 creditors are paid.
As a result, the total amount of Class 3 claims sharing in the
initial distribution is approximately $862,260.

In addition to the distribution of the sale proceeds, Class 3
creditors are entitled to receive the proceeds from any avoidance
actions undertaken by the Debtor.  

Currently, the Debtor does not believe avoidance actions exist and,
therefore, does not anticipate any additional proceeds from those
actions, according to the latest disclosure statement explaining
the plan.

A copy of the latest disclosure statement is available for free at
https://is.gd/GQ10LT

                      About Pykkonen Capital

Pykkonen Capital, LLC, is the owner of a ski resort located south
of Idaho Springs, Colorado, known as Echo Mountain Resort.  The
Company is 100% owned by its single member, Nora Pykkonen.

Pykkonen Capital filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. D. Colo.,
Case No. 16-10897) on Feb. 5, 2016.  The petition was signed by
Nora Pykkonen, manager. The Hon. Joseph G. Rosania Jr. presides
over the case.

Lee M. Kutner, Esq., at Kutner Brinen Garber, P.C, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

Pykkonen Capital LLC bought the ski area in August 2012 for $1.53
million, according to county records.  In its petition, Pykkonen
Capital estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.


QUANTUM MATERIALS: Incurs $1.57 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Quantum Materials Corp. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $1.57 million on $5,000 of revenues for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $866,949 on $0 of
revenues for the same period during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Quantum Materials had $992,717 in total
assets, $3.17 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $2.18 million.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had a working capital deficit of
$1,351,404, with total current assets and liabilities of $114,112
and $1,465,516, respectively.  Included in the liabilities are
$296,050 that is owed to the Company's officers, directors and
employees for services rendered and accrued through Sept. 30, 2016,
$74,083 of convertible debentures, net of unamortized discount and
$92,936 of notes payable, net of unamortized discount, that are due
within one year.  As a result, the Company has relied on financing
through the issuance of common stock and convertible debentures.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company has cash and cash equivalent
assets of $26,694 and continue to incur losses in operations.  Over
the past five years the Company has primarily relied on sales of
common stock and debt instruments to support operations as well as
employees and consultants agreeing to defer payment of wages and
fees owed to them and/or converting such wages and fees into
securities of the Company.  Management believes it may be necessary
for the Company to rely on external financing to supplement working
capital in order to meet the Company's liquidity needs in fiscal
year 2017 and 2018; the success of securing such financing on terms
acceptable to the Company cannot be assured.

"If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue
our plan of operations, our stockholders may lose their entire
investment in the Company," the Company said.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/JqdapZ

                    About Quantum Materials

Quantum Materials Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Solterra
Renewable Technologies, Inc., are headquartered in San Marcos,
Texas.  The company specializes in the design, development,
production and supply of quantum dots, including tetrapod quantum
dots, a high performance variant of quantum dots, and highly
uniform nanoparticles, using its patented automated continuous flow
production process.

Quantum Materials reported a net loss of $6.10 million on $240,800
of revenues for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to a net
loss of $2 million on $0 of revenues for the year ended June 30,
2015.

Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P., in Houston, Texas, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended June 30, 2016, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit
that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


QUANTUMSPHERE INC: Delays Filing of Sept. 30 Form 10-Q
------------------------------------------------------
Quantumsphere, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a Form 12b-25 notifying the delay in the filing of its
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended Sept. 30, 2016.

The Company was unable to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended Sept. 30, 2016, by the scheduled filing
deadline because the Company is still completing the final aspects
of the review of its financial statements for the period noted.

                    About QuantumSphere, Inc.

QuantumSphere, Inc., (QSI) has developed a process to manufacture
metallic nanopowders with end-use application focused on the
chemical sector.  The Company's principal activities include
capital formation, research and development, and marketing of its
metallic nanopowder products.  The Company manufactures various
metals, bi-metallic alloys and catalysts at the nanoscale,
including iron, silver, copper, nickel and manganese.  It offers
custom dispersions and integrated catalytic solutions for the
energy storage and chemical sectors, including nanoscale gold,
palladium, aluminum and tin.  The Company's products include
QSI-Nano Iron, QSI-Nano Silver, QSI-Nano Copper, QSI-Nano Nickel
and QSI-Nano Manganese.

QuantumSphere reported a net loss of $4.35 million for the year
ended June 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $5.30 million for
the year ended June 30, 2015.

Squar Milner LLP, in Newport Beach, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended June 30, 2016, citing that the Company has recurring
losses from operations since inception and has limited working
capital.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


QUEST PATENT: Incurs $5,000 Net Loss in Third Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------
Quest Patent Research Corporation filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $5,030 on $705,768 of revenues for the three months
ended Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $45,874 on $145,044
of revenues for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss of $807,725 on $1.19 million of revenues compared to a net
loss of $186,083 on $315,856 of revenues for the same period a year
ago.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Quest Patent had $2.39 million in total
assets, $3.37 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $988,303.

At Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had current assets of approximately
$269,237, and current liabilities of approximately $623,511.  The
Company's current liabilities include loans payable of $163,000 and
accrued interest of $244,838 due to former directors and minority
stockholders.  The Company's agreement with United Wireless
requires United Wireless to lend the Company the funds to make the
payments to Intellectual Ventures.  As of Sept. 30, 2016, the
Company has an accumulated deficit of approximately $15,233,000 and
a negative working capital of approximately $354,275.  Other than
salary to its chief executive officer, the Company does not
contemplate any other material operating expense in the near future
other than normal general and administrative expenses, including
expenses relating to its status as a public company filing reports
with the SEC.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:
  
                     https://is.gd/Lt2bUM

                      About Quest Patent

Quest Patent Research Corporation is an intellectual property asset
management company.  The Company's principal operations include the
development, acquisition, licensing and enforcement of intellectual
property rights that are either owned or controlled by the Company
or one of its wholly owned subsidiaries.  The Company currently
owns, control or manage eight intellectual property portfolios,
which principally consist of patent rights. The Company's eight
intellectual property portfolios include the three portfolios which
the Company acquired in October 2015 from Intellectual Ventures
Assets 16, LLC.

Quest Patent reported a net loss of $327,270 for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015, following a net loss of $162,331 for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014.

MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company has incurred a series
of net losses resulting in negative working capital as of Dec. 31,
2015.  These conditions raise substantial doubt as to the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


RANCHO ARROYO: Kim Buying Arroyo Grande Property for $1.4M
----------------------------------------------------------
Ranch Arroyo Grande, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California to authorize the sale of real
property located at 455-599 Hi Mountain Road in Arroyo Grande, and
known as Rancho Arroyo 14 Grande ("Ranch Property") to Soon K. Kim
or assignee for $12,400,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Dec. 13, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

The Ranch Property consists of 3,468 acres of ranch land developed
with a 9,768 sq. ft. residence and 1,856 sq. ft. guest house, a
partially completed winery, a 224 acre vineyard, an equestrian
center, an event center, two ranch houses, a 27-acre olive orchard,
220 acres of planted hay, as well as other improvements.  The
Debtor leases the 224 acre vineyard to Diamond West Farming, Co.
Inc. for a semi-annual payment of $74,800.  The Debtor leases the
Equestrian facilities to Cody and Becca Mora for $2,000 per month.

Cody and Becca Mora reside in one of the ranch houses located on
the real property.  Todd Ruffoni doing business as Ruffoni Farming
and Management, LLC manages the Ranch Property and engages in the
dry farming of 220 acres of hay pursuant to a Farming and Housing
Contract with the Debtor which is currently month to month.  Mr.
Ruffoni also resides in one of the ranch houses located on the real
property.

Included in the sale is personal property and equipment located on
the Ranch Property and the registered Trademark name "Rancho Arroyo
Grande."

The Ranch Property is subject to these liens and encumbrances:

   a. real property taxes assessed against the Ranch Property by
the County of San Luis Obispo for 2015-2016 totaling $237,753
pursuant to a proof of claim filed by the San Luis Obispo County
Tax Collector on Dec. 24, 2015, as well as, post-petition arreages
totaling to $118,000;

   b. A first deed of trust recorded Sept. 20, 2007 ("WF Deed of
Trust") originally in favor of Wachovia Bank, National Association,
securing a Note in the original amount of $14,500,000 ("WF Note").
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the successor to Wachovia
to the WF Note and WF Deed of Trust.  The Debtor is also obligated
to Wells Fargo under a Swap Modification Agreement dated April 17,
2015 in the amount of $1,511,818 which is also subject to the WF
Deed of Trust.  As of the Petition Date, Wells Fargo was owed
$12,860,503 pursuant to a proof of claim filed by Wells Fargo on
Feb. 26, 2016.  Additional, post-petition 13 arrearages are owed to
Wells Fargo totaling approximately $540,000;

   c. second deed of trust recorded Dec. 5, 2014, in favor of USI
Servicing, Inc. securing a Note in the original amount of
$2,000,000.00 pursuant to a proof of claim filed March 29, 2016.
Additional postpetition arrearages are owed to USI totaling
approximately $249,996.  The USI Note is cross-collateralized by a
second deed of trust against real property owned by the Debtor
located at 1530 Roble Drive in Santa Barbara, California ("Roble
Property").  The Roble Property consists of an 11,293 sq. ft. main
house with 9 bedrooms and 6.5 baths, a 2-bedroom guest house, pool,
tennis court and other improvements, including approximately seven
acres of landscaped gardens and was appraised at $12,000,000 as of
Dec. 1, 2015. The Roble Property is subject to real property taxes
totaling approximately $77,129 pursuant to proof of claim filed by
the Trust Deed held by Wells Fargo Bank in the amount of $2,363,669
pursuant to a proof of claim filed by Wells Fargo Bank on Feb. 29,
2016, together with post-petition arrearages totaling approximately
$156,000 and the USI second deed of trust.

The Debtor has received and accepted, subject to approval of the
court, an offer to purchase the Ranch Property from the Buyer for
$12,400,000, consisting of a $250,000 deposit, with the balance
payable in cash at close of escrow.  The proposed sale is not
subject to overbid and will include certain personal property and
equipment owned by Debtor used in the operation of the property
pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, together with the
registered trademark name "Rancho Arroyo Grande."  Escrow will
close by Dec. 31, 2016.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement and the list of the  personal
property and equipment proposed to be included in the sale attached
to the Motion is available for free at:

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/Rancho_Arroyo_175_Sales.pdf

On Nov. 30, 2015, the Court entered an order authorizing the
Debtors to employ Kerry Mormann and Berkshire Hathaway Services to
list the Ranch Property for sale.  On Oct. 31, 2016, the Debtor
executed a modification of terms/addendum to the listing agreement
extending the listing date to Jan. 15, 2017 and reducing the
listing price to $14,000,000.  

With regard to the proposed transaction, Mr. Mormann has agreed to
accept a 2% commission totaling $248,000.

The proposed sale to the Buyer is the highest and best offer
received by the Debtor for the Ranch Property.  Wells Fargo was
granted relief from the automatic stay pursuant to an order entered
by the Court on June 17, 2016.  A foreclosure sale has been set for
Dec. 2, 2016.  It is the Debtor's understanding and belief that
Wells Fargo will agree to continue the foreclosure sale to allow
the escrow to close under the terms of the Purchase Agreement on
Dec. 31, 2016 if the sale is approved by the Court.

The Debtor believes that the purchase price represents the current
fair market value of the Ranch Property and further believes that
confirmation of the sale is in the best interests of the Debtor and
its creditors in that the sale will satisfy the majority of the
secured debt owed to Wells Fargo against the Ranch Property and USI
will retain its security interest in the Roble Property.

The Debtor proposes to pay directly from escrow: (i) all
commissions and closing costs; (ii) real property taxes assessed
against the Ranch Property by the County of San Luis Obispo; and
(c) remaining net proceeds available after costs of sale, real
estate commissions, real property taxes to Wells Fargo Bank secured
by a First deed of trust recorded Sept. 20, 2007.

The Debtor asks the Court to waive the 10-day period provided for
in Federal 24 Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(g).

The Purchaser:

           Dr. Soon K. Kim
           Signature Healthcare Services, LLC
           2065 Compton Ave.
           Corona, CA 92881
           Facsimile: (951) 549-8032

The Purchaser is represented by:

           Richard Ruger, Esq.
           LEE ANAV CHUNG WHITE KIM
           RUGER & RICHTER, LLP
           The Biltmore Court Building
           520 S. Grand Ave., Suite 1070
           Los Angeles, CA 90071
           Facsimile: (213) 402-8635

               About Rancho Arroyo Grande

Rancho Arroyo Grande, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 15-12171) on Oct. 30,
2015.  The petition was signed by Christopher J. Conway, managing
member.  The case is assigned to Judge Peter Carroll.  At the time
of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $18.3 million in assets and
$14.6 million in liabilities.  The Debtor is represented by Karen
L. Grant, Esq., at The Law Offices of Karen L. Grant.


RENNOVA HEALTH: Incurs $12 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Rennova Health, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
attributable to common stockholders of $12 million on $290,004 of
net revenues for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2016, compared to
a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $1.51 million on
$5.89 million of net revenues for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss attributable to common stockholders of $22.11 million on
$5.22 million of net revenues compared to a net loss attributable
to common stockholders of $6.08 million on $28.92 million of net
revenues for the same period during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Rennova Health had $10.19 million in total
assets, $20.23 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $10.03 million.

"Our third quarter financial results are disappointing and do not
reflect the continued performance and success the Company has had
in recent months in securing new customers in all divisions of our
business.  Sales for the third quarter were less than the second
quarter as a result of the adjustment of our model towards business
for which we are more likely to secure payment, and longer
onboarding and integration times to start new customers. Underlying
sales in our software division have grown in the third quarter, and
we achieved a number of milestones and advanced several initiatives
to create cost efficiencies and drive growth in the fourth quarter
and throughout 2017," said Seamus Lagan, Rennova's chief executive
officer.  "Our immediate focus is to return Rennova to
profitability.  To that end, we believe it is vital to secure
preferred provider contracts with insurance companies and other
third-party payers.  This, we believe, will ensure adequate and
timely payment for our core business of laboratory testing
services.  Our success in securing licensure and contracts
throughout the year has driven the refocus of our sales efforts on
securing new business for which these licenses and contracts enable
us to receive payment."

"As previously disclosed, late 2015 saw a dramatic adjustment in
the substance abuse sector in which we have historically been
focused.  A number of large third-party payers declined to
reimburse laboratory testing services in the drug rehabilitation
and toxicology sector, owing to industry-wide issues of integrity.
Despite our exceptional compliance record, Rennova was negatively
impacted by these decisions.  However, I am very pleased with the
progress we are making to expand preferred provider contracts,
diversify our diagnostics business and build contracted sustainable
relationships for the other divisions of our Company. As a result
of these efforts, I believe we are on a path to quickly achieve
positive and profitable cash flow in the immediate future."

Commenting on expectations for the remainder of the year, Mr. Lagan
said, "While the lag in sales revenue from our recently added
customers and the losses incurred throughout the year have created
an uncomfortable financial position for the Company that has
resulted in the Company being in default of certain obligations,
the Company is currently seeking, and expects to secure, the
additional capital required to get to cash flow break even and
profitability in the near future.  The Company expects that recent
achievements have created the opportunity to grow revenues
adequately in all divisions to service its financial commitments
and meet its business objectives," Mr. Lagan concluded.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/SfftAe

                          About Rennova

Rennova Health, Inc. is a vertically integrated provider of a suite
of healthcare related products and services.  Its principal lines
of business are diagnostic laboratory services, and supportive
software solutions and decision support and informatics operations
services.

The Company reported a net loss attributable to the Company's
common shareholders of $36.4 million for the year ended Dec. 31,
2015, following net income attributable to the Company's common
shareholders of $2.81 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

The Company said in its annual report for the year ended Dec. 31,
2015, that "Although our financial statements have been prepared on
a going concern basis, we have recently accumulated significant
losses and have negative cash flows from operations, which raise
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern.

"If we are unable to improve our liquidity position we may not be
able to continue as a going concern.  The accompanying consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result if we are unable to continue as a going concern and,
therefore, be required to realize our assets and discharge our
liabilities other than in the normal course of business which could
cause investors to suffer the loss of all or a substantial portion
of their investment."


RENT-A-CENTER INC: S&P Revises CCR to 'BB-' on Continued Challenges
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its corporate credit rating on
Texas-based rent-to-own (RTO) company Rent-A-Center Inc. to 'BB-'
from 'BB'.  The outlook is negative.

At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level rating on the
company's secured bank facilities to 'BB' from 'BB+' and on the
unsecured debt to 'B' from 'B+'.  The recovery rating on the
secured debt is '2', indicating S&P's expectation for a substantial
recovery (70% to 90% range, low end) in the event of a payment
default or bankruptcy.  The recovery rating on the unsecured debt
is '6', indicating S&P's expectation of negligible recovery (0% to
10%) in the event of a payment default or bankruptcy.

"Our lowered ratings and negative outlook reflect continued
challenges in RCII's core retail business.  In our view, the
company continues to experience accelerated market share losses,
with negative same-store sales of 12% in the core business in the
third quarter of 2016," said credit analyst Olya Naumova.  "We see
further profitability downside potential if the company cannot
successfully optimize product categories, resize its large store
base, and solve various proprietary point-of-sale system
performance issues that are hurting sales and margins.  We also
remain cautious about any continued expansion of the lower-margin
Acceptance Now segment, which has grown from 6.7% of revenues in
2011 to an estimated 27% of revenues in 2016 and has been a
contributing factor to the adjusted EBITDA margin erosion to 13% in
the latest 12 months through Sept. 30, 2016, from 19% at the end of
2012."

S&P's negative outlook reflects expectations for a continued
challenging operating environment in the RTO industry that S&P
believes will remain pressured over the next 12 months.  S&P is
also cautious about the narrowing cushion under the amended fixed
charge coverage covenant that could result in another amendment
and/or constrained liquidity.

S&P could lower the rating if competitive and industry dynamics
lead to sales declines of 10% or more or if there are issues with
operational execution that result in a 200-bp EBITDA margin
decline.  Under that example, leverage would rise to about 4x for a
downgrade.  S&P could also lower the rating if, contrary to S&P's
base-case assumptions, the company is unable to secure lasting
covenant relief that ensures adequate access to the revolving
credit facility.

Although unlikely given continued price competition in the
industry, S&P could raise the rating if the company can grow
revenues by more than 5% or expand gross margins by more than 150
bps through improved core U.S. and Acceptance Now segment growth.
At that time, leverage would decline to below 3.0x on a sustained
basis.



REPWEST INSURANCE: A.M. Best Raises Fin'l Strength Rating From B
----------------------------------------------------------------
A.M. Best has upgraded the Financial Strength Rating to B+ (Good)
from B (Fair) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating to "bbb-" from
"bb+" of Repwest Insurance Company (Repwest) (Phoenix, AZ). The
outlook for these Credit Ratings (ratings) has been revised to
stable from positive. Repwest is a wholly owned subsidiary of
AMERCO [NASDAQ: UHAL], a publicly traded holding company that is
also the parent of U-Haul International, Inc. (U-Haul).

The rating upgrades reflect Repwest's strong risk-adjusted
capitalization, several years of improved operating results and
A.M. Best's expectation of stabilized underwriting performance
prospectively. The expectation of improved future performance
reflects the favorable results of the group's core business, which
has produced a five-year average pure loss ratio that outperforms
its industry composite average.

Offsetting these positive rating factors is the adverse loss
reserve development associated with Repwest's discontinued excess
workers' compensation business, which was particularly substantial
in 2011 and had a significant negative impact on the group's
calendar-year underwriting results for that year. The substantial
reserve strengthening that took place in 2011 resulted in a decline
in risk-adjusted capitalization and significant deterioration in
results that year. Further impacting Repwest is its historically
high-cost structure, mainly driven by commission expense.

Future positive rating movement could result from a demonstration
of stabilized underwriting results over several consecutive years.
Negative rating actions could result if there is deterioration in
Repwest's underwriting performance or a significant erosion of its
capital base.


RICHARD DENNIS HAYNES: BB&T To Be Paid in 60 Months at 3.25%
------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Dennis Haynes and Barbara Diane Haynes filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, Fort
Lauderdale Division a first amended disclosure statement
accompanying their first amended plan of reorganization in which
all creditors will receive their claims payment to the greatest
extent allowable under the Bankruptcy Code.

Class 1 consists of the claim of Wells Fargo Bank, NA., which
arises from a note secured by a first mortgage on 2801 Coral Shores
Dr. Fort Lauderdale Fl. 33306 in the amount of $48,224.16 on the
Petition Date. The note and mortgage are current and will continue
to be paid directly to Wells Fargo Bank N.A. without modification
under the terms and conditions set forth therein. The Debtor’s
mortgage payment is presently $2,764.43 inclusive of escrows for
taxes and insurance.

Class 2 consists of the allowed secured claim of BB & T which holds
an equity line of credit which is secured by a second mortgage on
2801 Coral Shores Dr. Fort Lauderdale Fl. 33306 in the principal
amount of $122,122.76.  Debtor will object to the prepetition
attorney’s fees of $6,780.81. Post Petition Attorneys fees will
be capitalized.  BB& T is oversecured by approximately $400,00.
The Debtor sought to modify or renew the note and mortgage in the
Mortgage Mediation Modification program. The mediation was not
successful. Debtors will make sixty (60) equal monthly payments to
BB& T in an amount to provide interest at the previous note rate of
3.250% and calculated with an amortization over thirty years.

Class 8 consists of Allowed Unsecured Claims which are presently
the claims set forth below:

   Charles Krblich PA             $4,954.94
   IRS claim 2                      $846.47
   SMS claim 4 (9309)           $300,530.90
   SMS claim 5 (9308)           $263,182.40
   Wells Fargo Claim 9 (7434)   $124,569.97
        (judgement from equity line on Tranquility)
   Wells Fargo claim 11 (1110)   $64,170.00

The Debtor will pay Class 8 creditors the amount of their
disposable income which is the sum of $150.00 a month for sixty
months in satisfaction of class 8 claims.

Payment to all creditors will be made from the Debtors disposable
income.

A full text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is
avalaible at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb15-27975-54.pdf

          About The Haynes

Richard Dennis and Barbara Diane Haynes sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
15-27975) on October 9, 2015.

Mr. Haynes is employed by Mindray North America as a sales
representative while his wife works for Christ Church United
Methodist, Inc.


RICHARD DODDS: Selling Frazee Property, Employs Brouse as Broker
----------------------------------------------------------------
Richard John Dodds and Cheryl Ann Dodds ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Colorado to authorize the employment of
Jim Brouse of LakePlace.com Lakeshore and More as the Debtors' real
estate broker in connection with the sale of real estate located at
30886 Eagle Lake Road, Frazee, Minnesota, outside the ordinary
course of business, to Terry Stallman or his assigns for $650,000.

The Debtors scheduled the value of the Property as $750,000.

The property is subject to these recorded liens and encumbrances:

    a. A Mortgage in favor of Midwest Bank, recorded with the
Becker County Recorder, State of Minnesota, at Document No. 566216
on Feb. 19, 2009, to secure a promissory note or other agreement,
No. 4702062 dated Feb. 9, 2009, up to the amount of $454,458;

    b. An Assignment of Leases and Rents, recorded with the Becker
County Recorder, State of Minnesota, at Document No. 566217 on Feb.
19, 2009, to secure a promissory note or other agreement, No.
4702062 dated Feb. 9, 2009, up to the amount of $454,458;

    c. A Notice of Pendency of Proceeding and Power of Attorney to
Foreclose Mortgage, recorded with the Becker County Recorder, State
of Minnesota, at Document No. 614735 on February 11, 2014, in favor
of Midwest Bank;

    d. A Judgment in favor of Janice and Terry Jones against the
Debtors in the principal amount of $63,586, dated March 25, 2014,
in Case No. 03-CV-15-78;
   
    e. A Notice of Pendency of Proceeding and Power of Attorney to
Foreclose Mortgage, recorded with the Becker County Recorder, State
of Minnesota, at Document No. 625104 on June 3, 2015, in favor of
Midwest Bank;

    f. A Minnesota State tax lien recorded with the Becker County
Recorder, State of Minnesota, at Document No. 626183 on July 16,
2015, in the total amount of $7,712;

    g. A Mortgage in favor of Border State Bank, recorded with the
Becker County Recorder, State of Minnesota, at Document No. 626853
on Aug. 12, 2015, in the amount of $600,000;

    h. A Judgment in favor of Provision Contractors, LLC against
the Debtors in the principal amount of $1,563, dated Aug. 21, 2015,
in Case No. 03-CV-15-2485;

    i. A Judgment in favor of Provision Contractors, LLC, against
the Debtors in the principal amount of $4,534, dated Aug. 21, 2015,
in Case No. 03-CV-15-2486; and

    j. A Minnesota State tax lien recorded with the Becker County
Recorder, State of Minnesota, at Document No. 631471 on Feb. 26,
2016, in the total amount of $9,200.

Upon information and belief, there are real estate taxes owed for
2015 in the approximate amount of $5,656.  While not yet due and
owing, there are real property taxes accruing against the property
for 2016.  The Debtors estimate that the total amount of 2016 taxes
are approximately, $10,626.

Upon information and belief, the Debtors assert that the current
amount owed to Midwest Bank is approximately $363,672.

According to the proof of claim filed by Border State Bank, the
amount owed to them is $615,079.  However, this claim is also
secured by the Bad Medicine property.

The Debtors assert that following a refinancing with Border State
Bank in August of 2015, all junior liens and encumbrances against
the property were satisfied, including all judgment liens, tax
liens, etc.  As such, the Debtors dispute all liens other than the
liens of Midwest Bank and Border State Bank.

The Debtors assert that the sale of the Property is in the best
interest of the Debtors' creditors in the case.  Accordingly, the
Debtors seek authority from the Court to employ Mr. Brouse and
Lakeplace.com - Lakeshore and More to list and market the property.
Lakeshore is available to handle the listing, marketing, and
eventual sale of the Property.  The Debtors intend to enter into an
Exclusive Commercial Listing Contract regarding the property.

Under the terms of the Contract, Lakeshore will act as the Debtors'
exclusive real estate broker through March 31, 2017 and Mr. Brouse
will be the primary broker assisting the  Debtors in listing and
marketing the property.  For their services, the Debtors will pay
the ordinary and customary rate of 5% sales commission on the gross
sale price of the property.  Such commissions and fees will be paid
upon the closing of the sale of the property.

The Debtors submit that the appointment of Lakeshore to act as the
Debtors' Real Estate Broker is in the best interest of the estate.
His employment, given his experience in listing and marketing lake
properties throughout Minnesota, will assist the Debtors in listing
and selling the property.  Accordingly, the Debtors ask the Court
to authorize the employment of Lakeshore, its compensation and
their entry into Contract with Lakeshore.

On Aug. 4, 2016, the Debtors entered into "Contract to Sell" to Mr.
Stallman, or his assigns for the purchase of the property.  Under
the Contract to Sell, the Debtors will receive $650,000 for the
property minus the costs of sale, including payment of the
commission to Mr. Brouse, closing costs, title fees, recording
fees, etc.

A copy of the Contract to Sell attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/Richard_Doods_59_Sales.pdf

The Debtors ask the Court to approve the sale of the property free
and clear of any liens and other interests in such property of
entities other than the estate if any, to the Buyer pursuant to the
Contract to Sell.

From the proceeds of the sale to the Buyer, the Debtors will pay
these:

    a. Broker Commission (5%): $32,500
    b. Past due real estate taxes: $5,656
    c. Current real estate taxes: $10,626
    d. Miscellaneous closing costs, title fees, recording fees,
etc.: $10,000
    e. Midwest Bank Mortgage: $363,672

The amount will allow the Debtors to pay the lien of Midwest Bank
in full.  No distribution will be made on account of the judgment
liens or other encumbrances, including Border State Bank. Rather,
the Debtor will escrow the net proceeds of approximately $227,546
in a segregated debtor-in-possession bank account following the
closing, pending further order of the Court.

The anticipated closing date is within 10 days following entry of a
Court order approving the sale.

To consummate the sale of the property in accordance with the terms
of the Contract to Sell, the Debtors ask that the Court suspend the
operation of Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004(h), which automatically stays
for 10 days an order authorizing the use, sale or lease of property
other than cash collateral.

Counsel for the Debtors:

          Kenneth J. Buechler, Esq.
          Jonathan M. Dickey, Esq.
          BUECHLER & GARBER, LLC
          999 18th Street, Suite 1230-S
          Denver, CO 80202
          Telephone: (720) 381-0045
          Facsimile: (720) 381-0382
          E-mail: ken@bandglawoffice.com

Richard John Dodds and Cheryl Ann Dodds sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 16-10809) on Feb. 1, 2016.


RICHARD LUTZ: Berks Buying Moorestown Property for $1.7M
--------------------------------------------------------
Jerrold N. Poslusny, Jr., of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey will convene a hearing on Dec. 20, 2016 at
10:0 a.m., to consider Richard Lutz's motion to sell real property
located at 351 Creek Road, Moorestown, New Jersey for $1,300,000,
and furnishings for $408,350, to Harvey J. Berk and Christine
Mouterde-Berk.

The property is owned by the Debtor and his wife Susan DiBiase
Lutz.  It consists of an eight-acre parcel on the Rancocas Creek in
Moorestown and is one of a kind.  Parts of the house were built in
1840.  It has six bedrooms and four and a half baths and over
10,000 square feet of living space.  They had  been trying to sell
the property for five years due to their financial problems and
their inability to pay the carrying costs for the property.

For the five years that the property has been on the market, it was
actively and aggressively marketed by their Realtor, Anne E. Koons,
with Bershire Hathaway Fox & Roach.  The property was originally
listed for $5,500,000 but the sale price has been reduced over
time.  In the entire time the property was listed for sale, they
have received only four offers, one of which was from a Russian
individual who never actually signed a contract.  The agreed upon
sale price is $1,300,000.

The Buyers have also offered to purchase the furnishings owned by
his wife for a price of $408,350, and they have agreed to that
offer as well.

A copy of the Agreements of Sale for the Property and the
Furnishings is available for free at:

          
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Susan_Dibiase_Lutz_22_Sales.pdf

The Buyers are individuals whom they never met before they were
showed the property by their Realtor.  The proposed sale is an
"arm's-length" transaction.  There is one mortgage lien against the
property, in favor of Caliber Home Loans, which is owed over
$2,000,000.  There are other liens against the property including
one from the State of New Jersey for income tax liability and
several judgment creditors.

Due to the large balance owed to Caliber, there are no proceeds of
sale to go to any other creditors.

If the sale of the property goes forward, it will be a benefit to
the estate because they will no longer have the carrying costs of
that property to contend with and the largest debt of their estate
will be significantly reduced, leaving more money to pay unsecured
creditors through a plan of reorganization.  There is no detriment
to the estate because there is no additional equity in the property
that can be used to pay unsecured debt.

The property is only one asset of their bankruptcy estate and is
not necessary to their Chapter 11 reorganization.  The Debtor
believes it is in the best interests of creditors that the sale be
permitted to proceed free and clear of liens.

The Purchasers can be reached at:

          Harvey J. Berk
          Christine Mouterde-Berk
          Berk 771 Allison Court
          Moorestown, NJ 08057

Richard Lutz sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No.
16-26969) on Sept. 1, 2016.  The Debtor tapped Ellen M. McDowell,
Esq., at McDowell Posternock Apell & Detrick, PC as counsel.


RIVERWOOD GAS: Case Summary & 16 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Riverwood Gas and Oil LLC
          fka Riverwood Energy LLC
        261 E Rowland St
        Covina, CA 91723

Case No.: 16-25483

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 23, 2016

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Judge: Hon. Neil W. Bason

Debtor's Counsel: Joseph M Hoats, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH M. HOATS
                  12672 Limonite Ave Ste 3E #345
                  Corona, CA 92880
                  Tel: 310-920-5806
                  E-mail: josephhoats@hotmail.com

Estimated Assets: $1 billion to $10 billion

Estimated Liabilities: $50 million to $100 million

The petition was signed by Joseph M. Hoats, CEO & President of
Inviron, sole member of Riverwood.

Debtor's List of 16 Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Alex Gendelman                          Loan             $145,000
                                   to Western Int'l
                                   Inc., Contract
                                    Joint Venture
                                   Operator with
                                       Debtor

Charles Ross                          Judgment        $27,500,000
c/o Richard Farkas, Attorney
15300 Ventura Blvd., Ste 504
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Tel: (818) 789-6001
Email: RichardDF@aol.com

Department of                       Amount Owed by        $800,000
Conservation                        WSI, Contract
Div of Oil gas &                    Joint Venture
Geothermal Resource                 Operator with
4800 Stockdale                      Debtor, for
Hwy, Ste 417                        abandonment of
Bakersfield, CA                     Costs re: Trico
93309                                Gas Field

Flavio M. Rodriguez                    Potential          $570,000
5055 E. Crescent Dr.                   Meritless
Anaheim, CA 92807                    Claims Against
Tel: 714-650-2821                        Debtor

Ingrid Aliet -Gass                      Contract                $0
Email: agorman@huskinsonbrown
       gorman.com

JAG Pathirana                          Potential          $100,000
                                       Meritless
                                         Claim

JNDDC, LLC                             Potential          $570,000
3505 Koger Blvd                        Meritless
NW, Ste 400                              Claim
Duluth, GA 30096

Leonard Kroyton                        Potential                $0
                                       Meritless
                                         Claim

Longbow LLC                           Creditor of         $250,000
1701 Westwind Dr                      WSI, Contract
Bakersfield, CA 93301                 Joint Venture
                                      Operator with
                                          Debtor

Michael Smushkevich                   Potential                $0
                                      Meritless
                                        Claim

Paul Giller                           Judgment           $135,000

Phoenix Oil and Gas Inc.              Potential                $0
                                      Meritless
                                      Ownership
                                      Interest in
                                        Leases

Tearlach Resources, Ltd.              Potential       $27,500,000
c/o Richard Farkas                    Interest
15300 Ventura Bldv.,                 in leasehold
Ste 504                              as a result of
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403                a judgment
                                     against Ingrid
                                      Alliet-Gass

United Pacific Energy                  Vacated         $2,465,000
Operations and Consulting, Inc.        Judgment
7120 Havenhurst Ave, #320
Van Nuys, CA 91406

Western States International, Inc.                             $0
Email: agorman@huskinsonbrowngorman.com

William L. Alexander, Esq.,             Unpaid            $25,000
Alexander & Associates                Legal Fees
Email: walexander@alexander-law.com


ROBERT ZARTLER: Files Amended Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------
Robert Zartler, Jr., and Mary Zartler filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania an
amended disclosure statement, which explains their proposed plan to
exit Chapter 11 protection.

According to the latest disclosure statement, Class 1, which
consists of claims entitled to priority under section 507 of the
Bankruptcy Code, will be paid in full prior to or at confirmation
unless otherwise agreed by the holder.  

Select Portfolio Servicing, the holder of first mortgage claim in
Class 2, will continue to receive a monthly payment of $2,503.

RG Financial's second mortgage claim in Class 3 and Keybank's third
mortgage claim in Class 4 will be crammed down per an adversary
action filed by the Debtors.

Class 5, which consists of general unsecured creditors, will
receive a dividend of 0%.  

Meanwhile, Class 6 consists of the Debtors' residual interest in
their non-exempt assets and equity in a real property, if any,
which will re-vest in the Debtors after completion of their
obligations under the plan.  The real property is located at 451
St. James Court, Nazareth, Pennsylvania.   

The Debtors are required to pay $840 per month from their personal
income other than any income generated by sale of personal property
to fund the restructuring plan, according to the latest disclosure
statement filed on November 3.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at
https://is.gd/1gMAe8

Robert J. Zartler, an individual, is the owner of the real estate
situated at 451 St. James Court, Nazareth, Pennsylvania.  Mr.
Zartler sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No.
16-15992) on Aug. 25, 2016.  The Debtor tapped John Everett Cook,
Esq., at The Law Offices of Everett Cook, P.C., as attorney.


ROCKY MOUNTAIN: Incurs $730,000 Net Loss in Sept. 30 Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $730,277 on $295,587 of sales for the three months
ended Sept. 30, 2016, compared to net income of $6.29 million on
$269,083 of sales for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2015.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Rocky Mountain had $2.33 million in total
assets, $4.07 million in total liabilities, all current, and a
total shareholders' deficit of $1.73 million.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had current assets in the amount
of $2,156,521, consisting of accounts receivable of $264,880,
inventory in the amount of $259,360, and prepaid expenses and other
current assets of $1,632,011.  As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company
had current liabilities in the amount of $4,070,046.  These
consisted of accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the amount
of $643,348, related party convertible notes of $103,352,
convertible notes of $677,923, other debt of $35,960, accrued
interest of $180,514, deferred revenue of $500,000, and a
derivative liability of $1,928,949.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/4wKTcH

                    About Rocky Mountain

Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., (RMHB) is a consumer goods brand
development company specializing in developing, manufacturing,
marketing, and distributing high quality, health conscious,
hemp-infused food and beverage products and spring water.  The
Company currently markets a lineup of five hemp-infused beverages.
RMHB is also researching the development of a lineup of products
containing Cannabidiol (CBD).  The Company's intention is to be on
the cutting edge of the use of CBD in consumer products while
complying with all state and federal laws and regulations.

Rocky Mountain reported net income of $2.32 million on $1.07
million of sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, compared
with a net loss of $16.62 million on $489,849 of sales for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.

Paritz & Company, P.A., in Hackensack, New Jersey, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended June 30, 2016, citing that the Company has a
shareholders' deficit of $1,477,250, an accumulated deficit of
$16,878,382 at June 30, 2016, and has generated operating losses
since inception.  These factors, among others, raise substantial
doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going
concern.


ROWE CONTRACTING: Dec. 21 Disclosure Statement Hearing
------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Elizabeth W. Magner of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Louisiana will convene a hearing on Dec. 21,
2016 at 9:00 A.M, to consider the approval of the Disclosure
Statement explaining Rowe Contracting Service, Inc.'s Chapter 11
Plan of Reorganization.

Dec. 14, 2016, is fixed as the last day for filing written
objections to said Disclosure Statement.

                About Rowe Contracting

Rowe Contracting Service, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 16-11331) on June
8, 2016. The petition was signed by Scott E. Rowe, president.  The
case is assigned to Judge Elizabeth W. Magner. The Debtor disclosed
total assets of $1.51 million and total debts of $1.57 million.


RXI PHARMACEUTICALS: Amends Form S-1 Prospectus with SEC
--------------------------------------------------------
RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission an amended Form S-1 registration statement  
relating to the offering of 2,017,000 Class A Units, with each
Class A Unit consisting of one share of common stock, par value
$0.0001 per share, and a warrant to purchase half of one share of
the Company's common stock (based on an assumed offering price per
common share of $1.19, which was the last reported sale price of
the Company's common stock on Nov. 10, 2016, at a public offering
price of $ ____ per Class A Unit.  Each warrant included in the
Class A Units entitles its holder to purchase half of one share of
common stock at an exercise price of $ _____.

The Company is also offering to those purchasers, whose purchase of
Class A Units in this offering would result in the purchaser,
together with its affiliates and certain related parties,
beneficially owning more than 9.99% of the Company's outstanding
common stock following the consummation of this offering, the
opportunity to purchase, in lieu of the number of Class A Units
that would result in ownership in excess of 9.99%, 9,600 Class B
Units.  Each Class B Unit will consist of one share of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share,
convertible into 840 shares of common stock and warrants to
purchase 420 shares of the Company's common stock (based on an
assumed offering price per common share of $1.19, which was the
last reported sale price of the Company's common stock on Nov. 10,
2016, which assumption is used throughout this preliminary
prospectus) (together with the shares of common stock underlying
such shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and such
warrants, the "Class B Units" and, together with the Class A Units,
the "units") at a public offering price of $1,000 per Class B Unit.
Each warrant included in the Class B Units entitles its holder to
purchase half of one share of common stock at an exercise price of
$_____.

The Class A Units and Class B Units will not be certificated and
the shares of common stock, Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
and warrants comprising such units are immediately separable and
will be issued separately in this offering.  The underwriters have
the option to purchase additional shares of common stock, and/or
warrants to purchase shares of common stock solely to cover
over-allotments, if any, at the price to the public less the
underwriting discounts and commissions.  The over-allotment option
may be used to purchase shares of common stock, or warrants, or any
combination thereof, as determined by the underwriters, but such
purchases cannot exceed an aggregate of 15% of the number of shares
of common stock (including the number of shares of common stock
issuable upon conversion of shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock) and warrants sold in the primary offering.  The
over-allotment option is exercisable for 45 days from the date of
this prospectus.

The Company's common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market
under the symbol "RXII".  The closing price of the Company's common
stock on Nov. 10, 2016, as reported by NASDAQ, was $1.19 per share.
The Company does not intend to apply for listing of the shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or the warrants on any
securities exchange or other trading system.

A full-text copy of the Form S-1/A is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/WFtQyu

                           About RXi

RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation, a biotechnology company, focuses
on discovering and developing therapies primarily in the areas of
dermatology and ophthalmology.  The company develops therapies
based on siRNA technology and immunotherapy agents.  Its clinical
development programs include RXI-109, a self-delivering RNAi
compound, which is in Phase IIa clinical trial that is used to
prevent or reduce dermal scarring following surgery or trauma, as
well as for the management of hypertrophic scars and keloids; and
Samcyprone, an immunomodulation agent, which is in Phase IIa
clinical trial for the treatment of various disorders, such as
alopecia areata, warts, and cutaneous metastases of melanoma.  The
company's preclinical program includes the development of products
for ocular indications with RXI-109, including retinal and corneal
scarring.  Its discovery stage development programs include a
dermatology franchise for the discovery of collagenase and
tyrosinase targets for its RNAi platform; and ophthalmology
franchise, a program for the discovery of sd-rxRNA compounds for
oncology indications, including retinoblastoma.  The company was
incorporated in 2011 and is headquartered in Marlborough, Mass.

RXi reported a net loss of $10.22 million in 2015 following a net
loss of $8.80 million in 2014.

"If we are unable to achieve or sustain profitability or to secure
additional financing, we may not be able to meet our obligations as
they come due, raising substantial doubts as to our ability to
continue as a going concern.  Any such inability to continue as a
going concern may result in our common stockholders losing their
entire investment.  There is no guarantee that we will become
profitable or secure additional financing.  Our financial
statements contemplate that we will continue as a going concern and
do not contain any adjustments that might result if we were unable
to continue as a going concern.  Changes in our operating plans,
our existing and anticipated working capital needs, the
acceleration or modification of our expansion plans, increased
expenses, potential acquisitions or other events will all affect
our ability to continue as a going concern," the Company stated in
its annual report for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.


SALADO SMILES: Selling Everbank Collateral for $21K
---------------------------------------------------
Salado Smiles, P.C., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Texas to authorize the sale of collateral of EverBank
Commercial Finance, Inc., to Howard Lufburrow, DDS, PLLC, for
$21,249.

The bankruptcy and the related bankruptcies of Howard Lufburrow and
Debra Dudley Lufburrow and Harker Heights Smiles P.C. resulted from
the expansion of Dr. Lufburrow's dental practice from one location
to three.  The managerial, financial and practical burdens of
operating three locations proved to be untenable and led Dr.
Lufburrow to close the locations in Harker Heights and Jarrell,
Texas.  The Debtor continues to operate a dental practice in
Salado, Texas.

Dr. Lufburrow now intends to consolidate his practice in Salado
operating as Howard Lufburrow, DDS, PLLC.

Everbank holds a perfected purchase money lien on certain equipment
detailed in the UCC-1 and Equipment Finance Agreements.

At the time of filing, the Debtor valued Everbank's collateral at
$31,500.  Everbank has filed a proof of claim in the amount of
$67,707.

The Debtor proposes to sell the collateral of EverBank to Lufburrow
for $20,000 plus tax of $1,249, for a total of $21,249.  EverBank
will finance the purchase at 3% interest over 48 months.  Dr.
Lufburrow will execute documentation required by EverBank to
document the terms of the transaction and retain perfection of its
lien.  The original offer to Everbank was for Lufburrow to purchase
some of the equipment and for Debtor to surrender the remainder.
EverBank agreed to sell all of the equipment to Lufburrow for
$20,000 after taking into consideration their cost in recovery and
resale of used dental equipment.

A copy of the Equipment Finance Agreements attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/Salado_Smiles_81_Sales.pdf

There will be no cash payment to the Debtor as part of this
transaction.  Although there will be no distribution to unsecured
creditors as a result of the transaction, management of the Debtor
is of the opinion that the transaction will result in some payment
to Everbank, will allow the patients of the Debtor to continue to
receive quality dental care with a minimal interruption in service,
and will allow the Debtor's employees to maintain their employment.


Management of the Debtor is of the opinion that the alternative to
the sale would be a foreclosure of its collateral by EverBank which
would also result in no distribution to unsecured creditors, but
would also result in disruption of payment services and loss of
employment by some or all of the Debtor's employees.

The Lender can be reached at:

          EVERBANK COMMERCIAL FINANCE, INC.
          10 Waterview Blvd., 2nd Floor
          Parsippany, NJ 07054

                       About Salado Smiles

Salado Smiles, P.C., formerly doing business as Sonterra Smiles,
operates a dental practice in Salado, Tex.  The company filed a
chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 16-10413) on Apr.
5, 2016, and is represented by Michael V. Baumer, Esq., in Austin,
Tex.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed total assets
of $177,203 and debt totaling $1.24 million.  

The Debtor remains as debtor-in-possession.

The meeting of creditors pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 341 was
conducted and concluded on May 6, 2016.


SITEONE LANDSCAPE: S&P Affirms 'B+' CCR; Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it affirmed its 'B+' corporate credit
rating on Roswell, Ga.-based SiteOne Landscape Supply Inc.  The
outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB-' issue-level rating on the
company's $300 million first-lien term loan due 2022 (includes $25
million add-on).  The recovery rating remains '2', indicating S&P's
expectation of substantial (70% to 90%; at the lower end of the
range) recovery in the event of a payment default.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that SiteOne will
maintain adjusted debt to EBITDA of roughly 4x and FFO to debt
between 15% and 20% over the next 12 months," said S&P Global
Ratings credit analyst Michael Maggi.  "Although we continue to
expect EBITDA growth over the next year--helped by the company's
acquisition strategy and continued growth in U.S. residential and
nonresidential construction, as well as repair and remodeling
spending--it is our view that SiteOne's owners (CD&R and John
Deere) will continue to exercise effective control of the company
over the near term despite the proposed reduction of ownership."

S&P continues to view an upgrade over the next 12 months as
unlikely given the control of SiteOne by a financial sponsor, S&P's
assessment of the company's business risk profile, and its
relatively short track record as a rated entity.  However, if the
company were able to reduce its adjusted leverage to below 3.5x and
increase FFO to debt to above 20% for a sustained period, while
strengthening its business risk profile through greater diversity
and total size, S&P could view SiteOne to be more in line with
similarly rated peers in the 'BB' rating category.

S&P could lower its ratings if the company took on a more
aggressive financial policy than it expects, incurring additional
debt to fund acquisitions, dividends, or share repurchases such
that adjusted debt to EBITDA rose above 5x.  S&P could also
downgrade the company if operating results came in worse than
expected or the company experienced integration missteps from
recent and future acquisitions, which could result in weaker
margins and higher leverage.  However, S&P views the latter to be
more unlikely over the next 12 months based on S&P's forecast for
continued economic growth in the U.S. and additional strength in
the repair and upgrade market (as well as the residential and
nonresidential construction markets).  Separately, S&P could revise
the outlook to negative if adjusted leverage was sustained above
4.5x.


SMILES AND GIGGLES: Jan 16 Deadline for Filing Disclosure Statement
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge K. Rodney May of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida, Tampa Division, issued an order establishing
January 16, 2017, as deadline for Smiles and Giggles Health Plaza,
LLC, to file a disclosure statement and plan of reorganization.

The Disclosure Statement must, at the minimum, contain adequate
information pertaining to the Debtor in the following areas: pre−
and post−petition financial performance; reasons for filing
Chapter 11; steps taken by the Debtor since filing of the petition
to facilitate its reorganization; projections reflecting how the
Plan will be feasibly consummated; a liquidation analysis; and a
discussion of the Federal tax consequences as described in section
1125(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Smiles and Giggles Health Plaza, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-08203) on Sept. 23, 2016.  The Debtor
is represented by David W. Steen, Esq., at David W. Steen, P.A.


SNAP INTERACTIVE: Names Boar Member Krandel as CFO
--------------------------------------------------
According to a Form 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Snap Interactive, Inc., has appointed Judy F. Krandel
as the Company's chief financial officer, effective Nov. 14, 2016.
Ms. Krandel had been a member of the Company's board of directors
until Oct. 7, 2016.

Ms. Krandel replaces Alex Harrington, who had been serving as
interim chief financial officer and fulfilling the duties of
principal financial officer and principal accounting officer since
March 15, 2014.  Mr. Harrington will continue to serve as the chief
executive officer of the Company.

Prior to joining Snap, Ms. Krandel, served as a portfolio manager
at the Juniper Investment Company, a small-cap hedge fund.  She
brings to SNAP more than 20 years of capital markets experience,
principally as an equity analyst and portfolio manager focusing on
small-cap stocks, with a strong concentration in consumer and
technology.  Throughout her career, she has worked closely with
corporate management teams to help them develop strategic business
plans, explore M&A and joint venture opportunities, raise capital
and enhance their investor relations efforts.

"Over the course of her career, Judy has established a stellar
reputation as a top small-cap investor.  In that capacity, she's
also served as a trusted advisor to many corporate management
teams, helping them unlock shareholder value.  As we integrate our
company after our recent merger, we are pleased to add
professionals of the highest caliber to our management team, who
will help us build a leading social networking and dating company,"
said Alex Harrington, CEO of SNAP.  "Judy's background as an
investor and equity research analyst will be a great asset in
helping the Company manage its strategic planning, capital markets
approach and investor relations effort.  She has also cultivated
deep relationships with participants in the small and micro-cap
ecosystem that we expect will help the Company achieve its
strategic objectives, which include listing our common stock on a
national securities exchange.  We welcome Judy to our team and look
forward to her contributions."

"I am excited to join SNAP's executive team and help build it into
a leader in the social networking and dating industry," said Ms.
Krandel.  "SNAP has the elements in place to be successful: It
operates in a very dynamic industry, with leading-edge technology
and a management team with the vision and experience to capitalize
on the opportunity.  I am looking forward to helping guide SNAP on
a path to continued success."

Ms. Krandel joined Juniper in 2011 as Portfolio Manager for the
Juniper Public Fund, a concentrated, value-oriented fund that
focuses on small-cap equities.  Before that, Ms. Krandel was a
Portfolio Manager at Alpine Woods where she managed portions of two
long/short equity hedge funds. Prior to that, she was a Portfolio
Manager from 2001 to 2009 at First New York Securities, LLC, where
her experience included founding and co-managing a domestic
long/short small-cap hedge fund.  Ms. Krandel has been engaged in
public equity research and investing since 1992, starting with Fred
Alger Management, followed by positions at Delaware Management and
Kern Capital Management.  Ms. Krandel received her B.S. from the
Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania and
her M.B.A. from the University of Chicago.

The Employment Agreement provides for an initial term of one year
and automatically renews for successive one-year terms, unless
earlier terminated by either party upon prior written notice.
Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Ms. Krandel is entitled to
the following compensation and benefits:

  * A base salary at an annual rate of $200,000, which will be
    reviewed at least annually, and may be increased at the sole
    discretion of the Board.
       
  * An annual incentive bonus of up to $50,000 for the 2017
    calendar year, $25,000 of which is guaranteed and the
    remainder of which is subject to the discretion of the Board.
    Annual incentive bonuses awarded for subsequent years will be
    determined by the Board, based on criteria to be established  

    jointly by the chief executive officer and Ms. Krandel.
       
  * A stock option to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock.
       
  * Four weeks paid vacation annually and reimbursement for
    eligible expenses.
       
  * Eligibility to participate in the Company's benefit plans that

    are generally provided for all employees.

A full-text copy of the Employment Agreement is available at:

                     https://is.gd/TrRLGk

                    About Snap Interactive

Snap Interactive, Inc. -- http://www.snap-interactive.com/--
develops, owns and operates dating applications for social
networking websites and mobile platforms.  The Grade is a
patent-pending mobile dating application catering to high-quality
singles.  SNAP's flagship brand, FirstMet, is a multi-platform
online dating site with a large user database of approximately 30
million users.

As of June 30, 2016, Snap Interactive had $2.86 million in total
assets, $6.58 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $3.71 million.

The Company reported a net loss of $1.29 million in 2015 following
a net loss of $1.65 million in 2014.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, issued a "going concern" qualification
on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2015, citing that the Company has incurred net losses and needs
to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Raises CCR to B- on Improved Revenues
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it raised its corporate credit rating
on Salt Lake City-based Sorenson Communications LLC to 'B-' from
'CCC+'.  The rating outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P raised its issue-level rating on the
company's $550 million senior secured first-lien term loan due 2020
to 'B-' from 'CCC+'.  The '3' recovery rating is unchanged,
indicating S&P's expectation for meaningful recovery (50%-70%;
lower half of the range) of principal in the event of a payment
default.

The upgrade reflects better-than-expected revenue and EBIDA
performance and S&P's expectation that the growth in CaptionCall
will offset declines in VRS.  Additionally, it reflects S&P's
expectation that Sorenson will continue to generate discretionary
cash flow beyond 2017.

"We view the company's business risk profile as weak.  Our
assessment reflects the significant regulatory risk related to the
level of reimbursement rates in the company's VRS segment, which
directly affects revenue and cash flow generation.  We view
Sorenson's financial risk profile as highly leveraged, given our
expectation that the company's financial policy will remain
aggressive due to is current ownership despite its lease-adjusted
leverage of approximately 4.3x as of Sept. 30, 2016.  We believe
that debt leverage will continue to decline over the next 12
months, but it will likely increase in the future," S&P said.

Sorenson facilitates telephone communication for deaf and
hard-of-hearing persons in the U.S.  The company has come under
increasing scrutiny by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC),
partly due to its position as the largest VRS provider in this
niche market.  Moreover, VRS is in the mature phase of its growth
cycle, with very high market penetration.  This suggests that
high-quality VRS is widely available within the deaf and
hard-of-hearing community and that new pockets of underserved
customers may be more difficult to find.  Sorenson's CaptionCall
business, a newer service for the hard-of-hearing, has experienced
high growth.  S&P believes CaptionCall will continue to grow at a
double-digit rate over the next 12 months.

The company's VRS reimbursement rate continued to decline 2016
according to the outlined reimbursement rate schedule put in place
by the FCC in 2013.  These lower rates relative to historical
levels impaired the company's revenue and cash flow potential.  S&P
expects the FCC will establish a new reimbursement schedule over
the near term as the current schedule will expired in 2017.
Furthermore, the reimbursement rate is set to decrease to $3.49 in
2017.  The vast majority of Sorenson's VRS minutes fall under this
third-tier rate.  The upcoming reductions in VRS reimbursement rate
will pressure VRS segment EBITDA.  Although the company's
CaptionCall segment is growing fast, S&P believes that the
government could impose some form of price cap over the next two
years, limiting CaptionCall's growth potential.

Sorenson went through a bankruptcy restructuring that significantly
reduced its adjusted debt leverage to a more sustainable level in
2014.  As of Sept. 30, 2016, Sorenson's adjusted debt to EBITDA was
4.3x, down from 4.8x at Dec. 31, 2015, primarily due to EBITDA
growth.  The company's leverage is below the indicative ratio of 5x
and above that S&P associates with an highly leveraged financial
risk profile.  However, S&P expects the company's leverage to
increase due to the company's financial sponsor ownership.
Adjusted EBITDA coverage of interest was about 2x as of Sept. 30,
2016.  S&P expects Sorenson to generate discretionary cash of $10
million-$30 million flow annually. However, a new and more
stringing rates schedule on VRS and CaptionCall could significantly
affect future discretionary cash flow.

S&P's base case assumes these:

   -- U.S. GDP growth of 1.5% in 2016 and 2.4% in 2017;

   -- High-single-digit revenue growth in 2016 and low-double-
      digit percent revenue growth in 2017 due to likely less
      pressure from VRS reimbursement rate;

   -- Low-single-digit EBITDA growth in 2016 and high-single-digit

      EBITDA growth and 2017; and

   -- Capital expenditures of roughly $40 million-$50 million.

Based on these assumptions, S&P arrives at these credit measures:

   -- Lease-adjusted debt leverage decreasing to the low-4x area
      at the end of 2016 and high-3x area at the end of 2017, and

   -- Free operating cash flow to debt of 2%-3.5% in 2015 and
      2016.

S&P believes the company will have adequate liquidity over the next
12 months.  S&P's assessment includes these expectations and
assumptions:

   -- Liquidity sources will cover uses by 1.2x or more over the
      next 12-18 months;

   -- Net liquidity sources will be positive, even if EBITDA drops

      15%-20% over the next 12 months;

   -- Sorenson will have sufficient covenant headroom if EBITDA
      declines more than 15%, without breaching the leverage
      covenant test; and

   -- The company can absorb high-impact, low-probability
      adversities without refinancing.

The liquidity sources include:

   -- Cash balances of $77 million; and

   -- S&P's expectation for discretionary cash flow of about
      $10 million-$20 million in 2016.

The liquidity uses include these:

   -- Manageable working capital needs; and

   -- Capital expenditures of about $40 million-$50 million.

The company has minimal debt maturities until 2020, when the
$550 million term loan and $375 million senior notes (unrated) are
due.

The first-lien credit facility is subject to a maximum first-lien
net leverage ratio of 6x.  S&P believes the company will maintain
adequate cushion of compliance with this test.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Sorenson's
CaptionCall business will continue to grow and offset declining
revenues in the VRS business and that changes to regulatory
requirements or possible lowering of reimbursement rates will not
adversely affect profitability.

S&P could raise the rating if the company refinances some of its
debt to lower service costs, and if a new reimbursement rate
following the expiration of the current rate card in 2017 allows
for earnings and cash flow sustainability.

S&P could lower the rating if further regulatory action results in
more stringent rate reductions in the company's VRS or CaptionCall
business.  S&P could also lower the rating if the company
experiences a sudden and dramatic attrition in its core customer
base that leads to a discretionary cash flow deficit.  This
scenario could occur as a result of increased competition from
other VRS providers.


SOUTHCROSS ENERGY: Bret Allan Assumes PAO Position
--------------------------------------------------
Effective Dec. 2, 2016, Mr. Bret M. Allan, currently the senior
vice president and chief financial officer of Southcross Energy
Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of Southcross Energy
Partners, L.P., will assume the responsibilities of principal
accounting officer from Tracy G. Owens, the general partner's vice
president and chief accounting officer.  Mr. Owens will be
departing the general partner on Dec. 2, 2016.  Mr. Owens'
departure from the general partner is not the result of any
disagreements regarding any matter related to the Partnership's
operations, policies, practices or otherwise, the Partnership said.
The Partnership does not anticipate any disruption to accounting
operations as a result of Mr. Owens' departure.

Mr. Allan has served as the general partner's vice president and
chief financial officer since June 2015.  Prior to joining the
general partner, Mr. Allan was vice president, finance and
treasurer for Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.  From 2010 through
2015, Mr. Allan led the treasury, cash management, credit and
corporate planning functions for Regency Energy Partners LP, a
midstream master limited partnership within the Energy Transfer
group.  The selection of Mr. Allan to assume the responsibilities
of principal accounting officer was not pursuant to any arrangement
or understanding between him and any other person. There is no
family relationship between Mr. Allan and any director or executive
officer of the General Partner.  In connection with this
designation, there are no changes to Mr. Allan's compensation as
disclosed in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ending Dec. 31, 2015.

               About Southcross Energy Partners

Southcross Energy Partners, L.P. --
http://www.southcrossenergy.com/-- is a master limited partnership
that provides natural gas gathering, processing, treating,
compression and transportation services and NGL fractionation and
transportation services.  It also sources, purchases, transports
and sells natural gas and NGLs.  Its assets are located in South
Texas, Mississippi and Alabama and include four gas processing
plants, two fractionation plants and approximately 3,100 miles of
pipeline.  The South Texas assets are located in or near the Eagle
Ford shale region.  Southcross is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Southcross Energy reported a net loss attributable to partners of
$51.4 million on $698 million of total revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss attributable to partners of
$36.7 million on $849 million of total revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Southcross Energy had $1.19 billion in total
assets, $613.11 million in total liabilities and $583.94 million in
total partners' capital.

                         *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on April 5, 2016, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services said it lowered its corporate credit and senior secured
rating on Southcross Energy Partners L.P. to 'CCC+' from 'B-'.

The TCR reported on Jan. 13, 2016, that Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Southcross Energy's Corporate Family Rating to 'Caa1'
from 'B2'.  "Southcross' Caa1 CFR reflects its high financial
leverage, limited scale, concentration in the Eagle Ford Shale and
our expectation of continued high leverage and challenging industry
conditions into 2017," according to the report.


SOUTHERN STATES: S&P Lowers CCR to 'CCC+' on Cash Flow Weakness
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit rating on Southern
States Cooperative Inc. to 'CCC+' from 'B-'.  The outlook is
negative.

At the same time, S&P lowered the issue-level rating on the
company's senior secured second-lien notes to 'CCC+' from 'B-' and
placed them on CreditWatch with negative implications.  Although
the recovery rating on the debt remains '4' (indicating S&P's
expectations for average [30% to 50%, in the upper half of the
range] recovery in the event of a default), S&P is uncertain of the
ultimate value that may be available to second-lien noteholders as
the company sells assets.

"The downgrade to 'CCC+' reflects our opinion that with the
announcement of the animal feed asset sale, the company has
accelerated its restructuring activities to include core
operations, which brings into question the sustainability of the
capital structure as future cash flows of the restructured business
may not be able to adequately support the company's current capital
structure," said credit analyst Jessica Paige.

In S&P Global Ratings' view, continued poor operating performance
has led Southern States to negative free cash flow generation,
forcing management to consider selling one of its most profitable
segments, the animal feed business, to Land O'Lakes for an
undisclosed amount.  Management is no longer selling peripheral
assets, as it did with the asset sale of grain elevators to Perdue
in June 2016.  The animal feed business represented approximately
$275 million in sales and over $25 million in gross margin in
fiscal 2016, and has been one of the company's growing, more stable
and attractive businesses.  Although management has not stated what
it would use the proceeds for, they could be used for debt
reduction, which would help alleviate the company's burdensome
capital structure, but may be transacted at distressed levels
resulting in a selective default.

The negative outlook reflects S&P Global Ratings' projections for
continued negative free cash flow generation as well as the
realistic possibility that the various strategic alliances and
asset sales will not generate enough cash flow to sustain Southern
States' previously manageable capital structure (consisting of $130
million in second-lien bonds that mature in 2021 and an ABL
facility maturing in July 2018 that the company consistently repays
by its fiscal year end).  Moreover, there is the possibility that
the company may, at some point, repurchase its bonds at a discount
to par, depending on how successful it is in monetizing future
divestitures.  S&P would consider lowering the ratings if the
company's turnaround strategy is not successful, and earnings and
working capital don't improve in fiscal 2017 (possibly due to
continued weakness in the company's agronomy segment leading to
sustained periods of negative free cash flow and de minimis cash
balances); or if management does not successfully monetize
divestments such that they opt instead to pursue a distressed
exchange of the outstanding second-lien notes.

S&P could consider revising the outlook to stable if the company
improves its financial performance such that it significantly
reduces its debt burden or restructures to sustain the inherent
earnings volatility, particularly in its agronomy segment.  Working
capital improvements stemming from the company's strategic
alliances turnaround strategy, coupled with sustained operating
improvement in the company's fertilizer and crop businesses, could
significantly improve cash flow.



SPRING VALLEY: Seeks Court Approval to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------
Spring Valley Real Estate Development, LLC, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for
authorization to use cash collateral and provide related adequate
protection to its secured creditors.

The Debtor has granted security interests to Cornerstone Bank,
Origen Capital Investments III, LLC, and Univest Bank & Trust Co.
on certain of its properties.

The Debtor relates that it had obtained authorization to use cash
collateral from Cornerstone Bank for essential water main repair on
its 5709 West Girard Avenue property.  The Debtor further relates
that it expects to maintain the upkeep of the properties subject to
the security interests of Cornerstone Bank, Origen Capital
Investments III, and Univest Bank & Trust Co.

The Debtor projects to incur expenses for the immediate and
upcoming repairs of the Cornerstone Properties, in the total amount
of $6,245; the Origen Capital Properties, in the total amount of
$480; and the Univest Properties, in the total amount of $60.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Nov. 21, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/SpringValley2016_1614247mdc_67.pdf

A full-text copy of the Debtor's proposed Budget, dated Nov. 21,
2016, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/SpringValley2016_1614247mdc_67_2.pdf

        About Spring Valley Real Estate Development

Spring Valley Real Estate Development, LLC, owns and manages
numerous rental properties in and throughout Philadelphia and its
surrounding suburbs.

Spring Valley Real Estate Development filed a chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 16-14247) on June 14, 2016.  The petition
was signed by Earle S. Greer, single member.  The case is assigned
to Judge Magdeline D. Coleman.  

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10
million at the time of the filing.

The Debtor is represented by Lisa R. Jenkins, Esq., at Lisa R.
Jenkins.


STONE ENERGY: Enters Into Third Amendment to Restructuring Pact
---------------------------------------------------------------
Stone Energy Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries entered
into a restructuring support agreement, as amended on Nov. 4, 2016,
and Nov. 9, 2016, with certain (i) holders of the Company's 1 3/4%
Senior Convertible Notes due 2017 and (ii) holders of the Company's
7 1/2% Senior Notes due 2022, to support a restructuring on the
terms of a pre-packaged plan of reorganization.  On Nov. 15, 2016,
the Company and the Noteholders entered into a third amendment to
the RSA pursuant to which:

   * the Noteholders will have the option to terminate the RSA at
     any time that the Noteholders determine, in their sole
     discretion, that (i) changes to the Specified Employee Plans
    (as defined in the RSA) are not acceptable and (ii) certain
     changes to the Indemnification Provisions; and

   * the requirement to commence solicitation to approve the Plan
     will be extended from Nov. 15, 2016, to Nov. 17, 2016.

Although the Company intends to pursue the restructuring in
accordance with the terms set forth in the RSA, as amended by the
Third RSA Amendment, there can be no assurance that the Company
will be successful in completing a restructuring or any other
similar transaction on the terms set forth in the RSA as amended by
the Third RSA Amendment, on different terms or at all.

A full-text copy of the Third Amendment to Restructuring Support
Agreement, dated Nov. 15, 2016, is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/Q33xSd

                     About Stone Energy

Stone Energy is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and
production company headquartered in Lafayette, Louisiana with
additional offices in New Orleans, Houston and Morgantown, West
Virginia.  Stone is engaged in the acquisition, exploration,
development and production of properties in the Gulf of Mexico and
Appalachian basins.  

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Stone Energy had $1.23 billion in total
assets, $1.75 billion in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $519.66 million.

Stone Energy reported a net loss of $1.09 billion in 2015 following
a net loss of $189.5 million in 2014.

Ernst & Young LLP, in New Orleans, Louisiana, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company could exceed
the Consolidated Funded Debt to consolidated EBITDA financial ratio
covenant set forth in its bank credit facility at the end of the
first quarter of 2016, which would require the Company to seek a
waiver or amendment from its bank lenders.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

                        *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Nov. 18, 2016, S&P Global Ratings lowered
its corporate credit rating on Stone Energy to 'D' from 'CC'.  "The
'D' rating reflects our expectation that Stone Energy will elect to
file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection rather than make the
November interest payment on its 7.5% senior unsecured notes due
2022," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst David Lagasse.


STONE ENERGY: Soliciting Acceptance of Prepackaged Plan
-------------------------------------------------------
On Oct. 20, 2016, Stone Energy Corporation and certain of its
subsidiaries entered into a restructuring support agreement, as
amended, with certain (i) holders of the Company's 1.75% Senior
Convertible Notes due 2017 and (ii) holders of the Company's 7.5%
Senior Notes due 2022, pursuant to which, among other things, the
Company will (a) commence a solicitation for acceptance of a
restructuring on the terms of a pre-packaged plan of
reorganization, (b) if certain approval levels are attained from
the Noteholders, file voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the
Southern District of Texas on or before Dec. 9, 2016, and (c) seek
approval of the Plan by the Bankruptcy Court.

On Nov. 17, 2016, the Company commenced a solicitation for
acceptance of the Plan.  The Disclosure Statement includes
important information relating to the Company's operations,
anticipated events during the Chapter 11 cases, pending litigation,
a summary of the Plan, a description of the new secured notes to be
issued pursuant to the Plan, financial information and projections,
valuation analysis, transfer restrictions and certain consequences
under the federal securities laws, certain tax consequences of the
Plan, certain risk factors, voting procedures and requirements
relating to the solicitation, confirmation of the Plan,
alternatives to confirmation and consummation of the Plan and a
recommendation relating to the Plan.

On Nov. 17, 2016, the Company filed a Form T-3 with the Securities
and Exchange Commission in connection with the commencement of the
solicitation for acceptance of the Plan.

On Nov. 3, 2016, Stone entered into confidentiality agreements with
an ad hoc group of the Noteholders.  In connection with discussions
that occurred in anticipation of the entry into certain amendments
to the RSA, the Company provided certain confidential information
to the Ad Hoc Group pursuant to the Confidentiality Agreements.
Pursuant to the terms of the Confidentiality Agreements, Stone has
agreed to publicly disclose all material non-public information
regarding the Company provided to the Ad Hoc Group and their
respective legal and financial advisors.  The Cleansing Materials
include (i) proposals from the Company and the lenders under the
Company's Revolving Credit Facility for treatment of the Revolving
Credit Facility in a Chapter 11 proceeding, (ii) certain estimated
payment obligations under the Plan, (iii) certain supplemental
financial projections of the Company and (iv) certain compensation
and benefits related information.  With respect to the RBL
Proposal, the Company and the lenders under the Company's Revolving
Credit Facility have been engaged in discussions and have exchanged
the RBL Proposal; however, no agreement has been reached on the RBL
Proposal.  While the Company expects to continue discussions and
related negotiations with its lenders, there can be no assurance
that an agreement will be reached.  With respect to the Benefits
Information, (i) the 2016 Incentive Plan -- Performance Goals, and
the information that follows through and including the table of
Quarterly Report on Goals, reflect the performance goals approved
by the Stone board of directors on adoption of the 2016 Performance
Incentive Compensation Plan and the Company's subsequent
performance on these goals during the first three quarters of 2016,
and the points awarded under the 2016 Performance Incentive
Compensation Plan in each quarter from which payment to employees
on quarterly award opportunities was then determined, and (ii) the
2016 Director Gift Match Program Summary reflects the matching
charitable contributions of up to $10,000 in the aggregate per
calendar year per director to qualified charitable organizations
made to date by the Company for fiscal 2016.

A full-text copy of the Proposed Disclosure Statement is available
for free at https://is.gd/PZnnwa

                       About Stone Energy

Stone Energy is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and
production company headquartered in Lafayette, Louisiana with
additional offices in New Orleans, Houston and Morgantown, West
Virginia.  Stone is engaged in the acquisition, exploration,
development and production of properties in the Gulf of Mexico and
Appalachian basins.  

For additional information, contact:

         Kenneth H. Beer
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Tel: 337-521-2210
         Fax: 337-521-9880
         E-mail: CFO@StoneEnergy.com

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Stone Energy had $1.23 billion in total
assets, $1.75 billion in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $519.66 million.

Stone Energy reported a net loss of $1.09 billion in 2015 following
a net loss of $189.5 million in 2014.

Ernst & Young LLP, in New Orleans, Louisiana, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company could exceed
the Consolidated Funded Debt to consolidated EBITDA financial ratio
covenant set forth in its bank credit facility at the end of the
first quarter of 2016, which would require the Company to seek a
waiver or amendment from its bank lenders.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

                        *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Nov. 18, 2016, S&P Global Ratings lowered
its corporate credit rating on Stone Energy to 'D' from 'CC'.  "The
'D' rating reflects our expectation that Stone Energy will elect to
file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection rather than make the
November interest payment on its 7.5% senior unsecured notes due
2022," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst David Lagasse.


STONE PANELS: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Until Dec. 16
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Harlin DeWayne Hale of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas authorized Stone Panels, Inc., and Stone
Panels Holding Corp. to use The PrivateBank and Trust Company's
cash collateral on a final basis, through December 16, 2016.

Judge Hale acknowledged that the ability of the Debtors to finance
their operations, to preserve and maintain the value of the
Debtors' assets and maximize a return for all creditors requires
the availability of the cash collateral.  He further acknowledged
that without the use of cash collateral, the continued operation of
the Debtors' businesses would not be possible, and serious and
irreparable harm to the Debtors, their estates, creditors, and
equity holders would occur.

The approved 6-week budget provides for a total disbursements of
$289,400 commencing on Nov. 5, 2016 until Dec. 16, 2016.

The PrivateBank and Trust Company made loans and other financial
accommodations available to Debtors by virtue of a Revolving Note
in the principal amount of $4,000,000 and a Term Note in the
principal amount of $8,000,000.  As of the Petition Date, Debtors
were indebted and liable to PrivateBank, under the prepetition loan
documents, in the aggregate amount of at least $9,246,619.  

PrivateBank has security interests in and liens upon all or
substantially all of Debtors' tangible and intangible personal
property and assets.

The Prepetition Loan Debt was paid down by $4,752,626.84 via a
post-petition payment from Thompson Street Capital Partners III,
L.P., a guarantor of the obligations under the Prepetition Loan
Documents.  Pursuant to the Court's Sale Order, the Prepetition
Loan Debt was paid down by an additional $4,000,000, which was in
partial satisfaction of PrivateBank's claims.

PrivateBank was granted a replacement lien in the prepetition
collateral and in the post-petition property of Debtors of the same
nature and to the same extent and in the same priority it had in
the prepetition collateral, subject to the Carve Out.

PrivateBank was also granted an allowed superpriority adequate
protection claim to the extent the adequate protection liens would
be inadequate to protect the Lender against the diminution in value
of the prepetition collateral.

Judge Hale held that the adequate protection obligations will have
priority over all liens and administrative expenses, except fees
owed to the U.S. Trustee and fees and expenses paid to estate
professionals, up to the amount set forth in the Budget.

The Debtor's use of cash collateral will terminate at the earliest
to occur of:

      (a) December 16, 2016;

      (b) the entry of an order by the Court terminating the use of
cash collateral;

      (c) the conversion of any Debtor's bankruptcy case to a case
under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code;

      (d) the appointment of a trustee or examiner or other
representative with expanded powers for any Debtor;

      (e) the occurrence of the effective date or consummation of a
plan of reorganization or liquidation of any Debtor;

      (f) any Debtor's non-compliance with any term or provision of
the Order;

      (g) the filing of an adversary proceeding by any party in
interest against PrivateBank for any reason, other than the
Challenge; or

      (h) the filing by Debtors of an application to grant priming
liens against the Collateral or grant administrative claims senior
to PrivateBank's claims.

A full-text copy of the Second Final Order, dated November 22,
2016, is available at https://is.gd/8SBqYb

                              About Stone Panels, Inc.

Stone Panels, Inc., manufactures natural stone composite panels for
exterior, interior, renovation, elevator, and specialty
applications in the United States, France, Europe, and
internationally.

Stone Panels, Inc., and Stone Panels Holding Corp. filed chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case Nos. 16-32856) on July 21,
2016.  The petitions were signed by Tim Friedel, the president and
CEO.  Judge Barbara J. Houser is assigned to the cases.  The
operating company estimated its assets at $10 million to $50
million, the Holding company estimated its assets at less than
$50,000, and both companies estimated their liabilities at $10
million to $50 million at the time of the filing.

The Debtors have hired Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis LLP as
counsel, Gray Reed & SSG Advisors, LLC, as investment banker and
Bill Roberts of CR3 Partners as chief restructuring officer.

The U.S. Trustee formed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors, with 4 members: Brookside Mezzanine Fund III, L.P., IMAP
Global Logistics, Elite on Premise, and Brick-Works UK Ltd.  The
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by Culhane
Meadows, PLLC.


STRATA SKIN: Files Form 10-Q, Incurs $1.5M Net Loss in Q3
---------------------------------------------------------
Strata Skin Sciences, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
attributable to common stockholders of $1.51 million on $7.76
million of revenues for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2016,
compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$12.19 million on $8.32 million of revenues for the three months
ended Sept. 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2016, the Company reported a
net loss attributable to common stockholders of $2.44 million on
$23.12 million of revenues compared to a net loss attributable to
common stockholders of $27.31 million on $9.01 million of revenues
for the same period a year ago.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Strata Skin had $42.95 million in total
assets, $27.07 million in total liabilities and $15.87 million in
total stockholders' equity.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had an accumulated deficit of
$209,688 and has incurred losses and negative cash flows from
operations since inception.  To date, the Company has dedicated
most of its financial resources to research and development, sales
and marketing, and general and administrative expenses.

The Company has been dependent on raising capital from the sale of
securities in order to continue to operate and to meet its
obligations in the ordinary course of business.  Management
believes that its cash and cash equivalents as of Sept. 30, 2016,
combined with the anticipated revenues from the sale of the
Company's products will be sufficient to satisfy its working
capital needs, capital asset purchases, outstanding commitments and
other liquidity requirements associated with its existing
operations through the fourth quarter of 2017.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/EZFFn7
   
                   About STRATA Skin Sciences

STRATA Skin Sciences (formerly MELA Sciences, Inc.) is a medical
technology company focused on the therapeutic and diagnostic
dermatology market.  Its products include the XTRAC laser and VTRAC
excimer lamp systems utilized in the treatment of psoriasis,
vitiligo and various other skin conditions; and the MelaFind system
used to assist in the identification and management of melanoma.

Strata Skin reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $27.9 million on $18.5 million of revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $16.03 million on $915,000
of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.  It reported a net
loss of $25.948 million for 2013 and a net loss of $22.673 million
for 2012.

                          *    *    *

This concludes the Troubled Company Reporter's coverage of STRATA
Skin Sciences until facts and circumstances, if any, emerge that
demonstrate financial or operational strain or difficulty at a
level sufficient to warrant renewed coverage.


SUSAN DIBIASE LUTZ: Berks Buying Moorestown Property for $1.7M
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jerrold N. Poslusny, Jr., of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey will convene a hearing on Dec. 20, 2016 at
10:0 a.m. to consider Susan M. DiBiase Lutz's motion to sell real
property located at 351 Creek Road, Moorestown, New Jersey for
$1,300,000, and furnishings for $408,350, to Harvey J. Berk and
Christine Mouterde-Berk.

The property is owned by the Debtor and her husband Richard Lutz.
It consists of an eight-acre parcel on the Rancocas Creek in
Moorestown and is one of a kind.  Parts of the house were built in
1840.  It has six bedrooms and four and a half baths and over
10,000 square feet of living space.  They had  been trying to sell
the property for five years due to their financial problems and
their inability to pay the carrying costs for the property.

For the five years that the property has been on the market, it was
actively and aggressively marketed by their Realtor, Anne E. Koons,
with Bershire Hathaway Fox & Roach.  The property was originally
listed for $5,500,000 but the sale price has been reduced over
time.  In the entire time the property was listed for sale, they
have received only four offers, one of which was from a Russian
individual who never actually signed a contract.  The agreed upon
sale price is $1,300,000.

The Buyers have also offered to purchase the furnishings owned by
the Debtor for a price of $408,350, and they have agreed to that
offer as well.

A copy of the Agreements of Sale for the Property and the
Furnishings is available for free at:

          
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Susan_Dibiase_Lutz_22_Sales.pdf

The Buyers are individuals whom they never met before they were
showed the property by their Realtor.  The proposed sale is an
"arm's-length" transaction.  There is one mortgage lien against the
property, in favor of Caliber Home Loans, which is owed over
$2,000,000.  There are other liens against the property including
one from the State of New Jersey for income tax liability and
several judgment creditors.

Due to the large balance owed to Caliber, there are no proceeds of
sale to go to any other creditors.

If the sale of the property goes forward, it will be a benefit to
the estate because they will no longer have the carrying costs of
that property to contend with and the largest debt of their estate
will be significantly reduced, leaving more money to pay unsecured
creditors through a plan of reorganization.  There is no detriment
to the estate because there is no additional equity in the property
that can be used to pay unsecured debt.

The property is only one asset of their bankruptcy estate and is
not necessary to their Chapter 11 reorganization.  The Debtor
believes it is in the best interests of creditors that the sale be
permitted to proceed free and clear of liens.  Accordingly, the
Debtor asks the Court to approve the relief sought.

The Purchasers can be reached at:

          Harvey J. Berk
          Christine Mouterde-Berk
          Berk 771 Allison Court
          Moorestown, NJ 08057

Susan M. DiBiase Lutz sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J.
Case No. 16-29499) on Oct. 12, 2016.  The Debtor tapped Ellen M.
McDowell, Esq., at McDowell Posternock Apell & Detrick, PC as
counsel.


SUZANNE ALESHIRE: Payment of $10K to FactorLaw Approved
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Janet S. Baer of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Illinois authorized Suzanne Mulder Aleshire to pay
$10,000 to her attorneys, FactorLaw, in order to replenish its
Retainer prior to the upcoming trial on plan confirmation.

The Debtor is preparing for a contested hearing on confirmation of
her plan and on Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss the bankruptcy case
for inability to confirm a plan.  There will be several witnesses
at the hearing, and FactorLaw will need to spend many, many hours
preparing for the hearing.  The Debtor requested authority to pay
$10,000 to FactorLaw to replenish the Retainer, so that FactorLaw
is assured that there will be funds available to pay the fees
incurred during this period.

Suzanne Mulder Aleshire sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D.
Ill. Case No. 15-01652) on Jan. 19, 2015.


SYDELL INC: Wants to Continue Using Cash Through April 1
--------------------------------------------------------
Sydell, Inc., d/b/a Spa Sydell, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Georgia for authorization to continue
using cash collateral.

The Debtor currently has until Jan. 1, 2017 to use cash collateral,
pursuant to the Final Order dated Oct. 18, 2016.

The holders of secured claims against the Debtor, who may assert an
interest in the cash collateral are:

     (1) The Internal Revenue Service, which asserts a secured
claim of $3,362,238.23;

     (2) American Express Bank, FSB, which asserts a secured claim
of $25,992.82.

The Debtor relates that the State of Georgia Department of Labor
has a priority unsecured claim, and that Merchant Capital Source,
LLC appears to have filed a UCC-1 financing statement listing
receivables as collateral, but has not appeared in the case.  The
Debtor further relates that Branch Banking & Trust Company, which
held a secured claim in the Debtor's prior chapter 11 case, did not
appear to have filed a continuation statement following the
conclusion of the prior chapter 11 case.

The Debtor tells the Court that it wants to continue using cash
collateral on the same operative terms as the October 18, 2016
Final Order, except for:

     (1) the carry forward of surpluses in prior budgets;

     (2) the extension of the expiration date from Jan. 1, 2017 to
April 1, 2017; and

     (3) its proposed Budget.

The Debtor proposes to grant the IRS and American Express Bank a
continuing valid, enforceable, perfected and continuing security
interest in, and lien upon, all the Debtor's post-petition assets,
of the same type and to the same extent as the collateral securing
the Debtor's indebtedness to each creditor prior to the Petition
Date.

The Post-Petition Collateral and any security interests and/or
liens granted to the IRS and American Express Bank will be subject
to:

     (1) any unpaid fees of the Clerk of Court;

     (2) any unpaid fees of the U.S. Trustee; and

     (3) a carve-out in an aggregate amount not to exceed $90,000
for allowed unpaid fees and expenses payable under the Bankruptcy
Code.

The Debtor's proposed Budget for the period Jan. 1,2017 through
March 31, 2017, projects total expenses in the amount of
$1,160,000.

A hearing on the Debtor's Motion is scheduled on Dec. 6, 2016 at
10:00 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Nov. 21, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/SydellInc2016_1664647pwb_137.pdf

                        About Sydell, Inc.

Beauty spa operator Sydell, Inc., d/b/a SPA Sydell, filed a chapter
11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 16-64647) on Aug. 22, 2016,
four years after emerging from a prior bankruptcy case.  The
petition was signed by Reina A. Bermudez, chief executive officer
and 100% owner of Sydell.  

Sydell, Inc., tapped John Michael Levengood, Esq., at the Law
Office of J. Michael Levengood, LLC as counsel; and GGG Partners,
LLC as financial consultants.  It hired Tanya Adrews Tate as its
special bankruptcy counsel, and Right on the Books Consultants, LLC
as its accountants.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million as of the bankruptcy filing.

Sydell first filed for bankruptcy (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No.
09-83407) on Sept. 3, 2009.  That petition was signed by Ms.
Bermudez.  The Debtor was represented by David G. Bisbee, Esq., at
the Law Office of David G. Bisbee.  The 2009 petition estimated
assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million at the time of
the filing.  The Company emerged from Chapter 11 in 2012.



TENET HEALTHCARE: Fitch Assigns B- Rating on $750MM 2nd Lien Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'B-/RR5' rating to Tenet Healthcare
Corp.'s $750 million 7.5% senior secured second lien notes.  About
$500 million of the proceeds will be used to pay down balances
outstanding on Tenet's asset based lending (ABL) facility, which
was drawn to fund litigation settlements during fourth-quarter
2016.  The senior secured first lien notes have been downgraded to
'BB-/RR2' from 'BB/RR1' because of lower recovery prospects for the
lenders in a hypothetical bankruptcy scenario.  The Rating Outlook
is Stable.

                        KEY RATING DRIVERS

Favorable Operating Profile: Tenet is among the largest for-profit
operators of acute care hospitals in the U.S., and following the
acquisition of a majority ownership interest in United Surgical
Partners International (USPI) in 2015, the largest operator of
ambulatory surgery and imaging centers.  Scale is increasingly
important as U.S. healthcare providers seek efficiencies to offset
the effects of an overall constrained reimbursement environment.

Lengthy Deleveraging Horizon: Debt funding of the USPI transaction
prolonged the deleveraging horizon Fitch considered following
Tenet's 2013 acquisition of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.
Deleveraging has been slow because it relies primarily on EBITDA
growth.  Tenet's weak FCF limits the company's ability to repay
debt.

FCF Persistently Weak: Improved profitability and lower cash
interest expense following the refinancing of high-cost debt are
contributing to slightly improving FCF, but the level remains weak,
both on an absolute basis and compared with the company's peer
group.  Project-related capex was a heavy use of CFO in recent
years.  Management expects to spend about $150 million less in 2017
following the completion of in-progress construction projects.
Fitch's ratings case forecast builds in a more conservative
estimate of $100 million of savings from reduced capital
expenditures as a tailwind to FCF in 2017.

Uncertain Future of the Affordable Care Act: Hospital industry
management teams are contending with a very dynamic regulatory
environment made more complicated by the results of the
presidential election.  It would not be crushing to the acute care
hospital sector if the insurance expansion elements of the ACA are
rolled back under a Trump administration, but it has been a boost
to a sector that is facing a host of other secular challenges to
profitability.

                         KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for Tenet include:

   -- Top-line growth of about 5% 2016 and 3-5% in 2017-2019;
      assumes low single digit organic growth in the hospital
      operations segment and mid-single digit organic growth in
      the Conifer Health Solutions and ambulatory care segments;

   -- This growth forecast assumes no major changes in the
      regulatory environment or broad macro-economic trends and is

      driven by flat government pricing, low to mid single digit
      increases in commercial pricing, tepid but positive volume
      growth in the hospital segment and better volume growth in
      the ambulatory segment;
   -- Operating EBITDA margin (Fitch EBITDA calculation excludes
      income from affiliates) of 11.9% in 2016 and expanding
      slightly through the forecast period;
   -- Tenet will spend about $1.3 billion to acquire the remaining

      43.7% interest in the USPI joint venture through 2020;
   -- Capital expenditures of $890 million in 2016, declining to
      about $785 million in 2017;
   -- FCF (CFO less capital expenditures and dividends to
      associates and minorities) is positive at the end of 2016,
      and the 2016-2019 FCF margin is about 1-2%;
   -- 2016 debt balance is pro forma for $750 million second lien
      note issuance, otherwise no major change in debt balance in
      2017-2019;
   -- Total debt to EBITDA after dividends to associates and
      minorities is 7.2x at the end of 2016 and declines to about
      6.2x by 2019.

                        RATING SENSITIVITIES

Maintenance of Tenet's 'B' IDR considers gross debt/EBITDA after
dividends to associates and minorities declining to about 6.2x over
the next several years as a result of growth in EBITDA. Maintenance
of the rating also considers that Tenet will make continued slow
progress in expanding operating and FCF margins.

A reversal in positive trends could result in a negative rating
action, particularly if coupled with capital deployment that
requires additional debt funding.  Specifically, gross debt/EBITDA
after dividends to associates and minorities durably above 7.0x
coupled with a cash flow deficit that requires incremental debt
funding are likely to cause a downgrade to 'B-'.  An expectation of
gross debt/EBITDA after dividends to associates and minorities
sustained near 5.5x and a FCF margin of 3%-4% could result in an
upgrade to 'B+'.

                              LIQUIDITY

Tenet's liquidity profile is adequate aside from persistently weak
FCF.  At Sept. 30, 2016, liquidity was provided by $649 million of
cash on hand and $998 million of availability on the $1 billion
capacity bank revolver with LTM FCF of negative $43 million.  There
are no significant debt maturities until 2018, and compliance with
financial maintenance covenants is not a concern. LTM
EBITDA/interest paid equals 2.4x.

Tenet's debt agreements do not include financial maintenance
covenants aside from a 1.5x fixed charge coverage ratio test in the
bank agreement that is only in effect during a liquidity event,
which is whenever available credit as calculated based on the bank
agreement definitions is less than $100 million.  The first lien
secured note indentures do limit the company's ability to issue
additional secured debt, which is permitted up to the greater of
$3.2 billion and 4.0x EBITDA.  Debt secured on a pari passu basis
to the first lien secured notes is limited to the greater of $2.6
billion and 3.0x EBITDA.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has taken these rating actions:

Tenet Healthcare Corp.
   -- Long-term IDR affirmed at 'B';
   -- Senior secured ABL facility affirmed at 'BB/RR1';
   -- Senior secured first lien notes downgraded to 'BB-/RR2' from

      'BB/RR1';
   -- Senior unsecured notes affirmed at 'B-/RR5';
   -- Senior secured second lien notes rated 'B-/RR5'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The 'BB/RR1' and 'BB-/RR2' ratings for Tenet's ABL facility and the
senior secured first lien notes reflects Fitch's expectation of
100% recovery for the ABL facility and 86% recovery for the first
lien secured notes, respectively, under a bankruptcy scenario.  The
'B-/RR5' rating on the senior secured second lien notes and senior
unsecured notes reflects Fitch's expectations of recovery of 30% of
outstanding principal.  The ABL facility is assumed to be fully
recovered before the other secured debt in the capital structure.
The ABL facility is secured by a first-priority lien on the patient
accounts receivable of all of the borrower's wholly owned hospital
subsidiaries, while the first and second lien secured notes are
secured by the capital stock of the operating subsidiaries, making
the notes structurally subordinate to the ABL facility with respect
to the accounts receivable collateral.

Fitch's estimates an enterprise value (EV) on a going concern basis
of $8.3 billion for Tenet, net of a standard deduction of 10% for
administrative claims.  The EV assumption is based on a 38% haircut
to LTM EBITDA after dividends to associates and minorities.  Fitch
then applies a 7.0x multiple based on observation of both recent
transactions/takeout and public market multiples in the healthcare
industry.

Fitch assumes that Tenet would draw $500 million or 50% of the
available capacity on the $1 billion ABL facility in a bankruptcy
scenario, and includes that amount in the claims waterfall.  The
revolver is collateralized by patient accounts receivable, and
Fitch assumes a reduction in the borrowing base in a distressed
scenario, limiting the amount Tenet can draw on the facility.

Based on the definitions of the secured debt agreements, Fitch
believes that the group of operating subsidiaries that guarantee
the secured debt excludes any non-wholly owned and non-domestic
subsidiaries, and therefore does not encompass most of the value of
the Conifer and ambulatory care segments.  At Sept. 30, 2016, about
65% of consolidated LTM EBITDA was contributed by the hospital
operations segment, and Fitch uses this value as a proxy to
determine the rough value of the secured debt collateral of $5.4
billion.  Fitch assumes this amount is completely consumed by the
ABL facility and the first lien lenders, leaving $2.9 billion of
residual value to be distributed to the remaining $1.2 billion of
first lien claims, the second lien secured and unsecured claims.

The downgrade of the first lien notes to 'BB-/RR2' from 'BB/RR1'
occurred because the remaining $1.2 billion portion of the first
lien notes and the entire amount of the second lien notes are
treated as unsecured deficiency claims in Fitch's waterfall
analysis, and these claims are pari passu with the $7.8 billion of
senior unsecured note claims.  The addition of the $750 million of
second lien notes increased the total amount of the unsecured
deficiency claims, depressing the pro rata recovery of the first
lien notes.



TERRA-GEN FINANCE: S&P Lowers CCR to 'B' on Slow Deleveraging
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term corporate credit rating on
Terra-Gen Finance Co. LLC (TGF) to 'B' from 'B+'.  The outlook is
stable.  At the same time, S&P Global Ratings lowered its
issue-level ratings on the company's $300 million senior secured
term loan B due 2021 and $25 million revolving credit facility due
2019 to 'B+' from 'BB-'.  The '2' recovery rating on the debt is
unchanged, and reflects S&P's expectation of substantial (70%-90%;
in the lower end of the range) recovery in a default scenario.

The downgrade stems from TGF's weakened financial position
following lower wind speed in 2015 and short-run avoided cost
(SRAC) prices.  Lower wind speeds were the result of El Nino
weather patterns that affected many parts of the U.S., including
California, where most of TGF's wind assets are located.  Wind
speeds in the state have improved in 2016.  S&P expects that wind
speeds will remain in line with historical averages, so S&P's
forecast related to wind generation is unchanged from its most
recent review.

"However, we expect SRAC prices, which affect a significant portion
of the company's revenues, to be depressed for the foreseeable
future," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Yousaf Siddique.
S&P bases this on its forecast of the gas price that S&P expects to
remain low in the next few years, as well as ongoing low market
heat rates in its key markets.  The SRAC price is a proxy for the
market prices and is calculated based on gas prices and market heat
rate of energy.

S& assess TGF's business risk as fair, reflecting the company's
relatively small scale and exposure to potentially volatile wind
volumes and SRAC pricing.  Partially offsetting this are TGF's
relatively high proportion of contracted revenue streams coming
from 21 renewable assets, mostly in California; and a strong
operating track record, with an average availability of about 97%.
The company has some geographic diversity (six states),
renewable-fuel sources (about 25% of cash flows come from non-wind
assets), and a range of proven technologies, although its total
capacity is dwarfed by most of the independent power producers S&P
compared it with.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectations that TFG will have
minimal operational issues and its cash flows in 2017 will be far
better than that of 2015.  S&P expects the company will deleverage
more rapidly than in 2015.  S&P also believes that its sustained
debt-to-EBITDA will be less than 12x and FFO interest coverage be
higher than 1.2x.

The rating could face downward pressure if there is a significant
drop in revenues, stemming mainly from lower wind generation or the
SRAC pricing.  This would lead to the project's cash sweep being
significantly lower than S&P's projections, such that the company's
sustained debt-to-EBITDA exceeds 12x.  S&P could also lower the
rating should TGF's FFO interest coverage fall and stay below 1.2x.


S&P could take a positive rating action in the next year if power
prices improve or the company has favorable contracting
opportunities, resulting in higher revenues and faster deleveraging
such that debt-to-EBITDA falls and stays below 5x and FFO interest
coverage above 2x.


TIMOTHY MCCALLAN: Florida Debt Counselor Owes $100M, Files Ch. 7
----------------------------------------------------------------
The American Bankruptcy Institute, citing Paul Brinkmann of the
Orlando Sentinel, reported that a Central Florida businessman who
made a name for himself as a debt counselor during the Great
Recession has filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, listing more than
$100 million in liabilities.

Timothy McCallan, of Melbourne, was hit with a judgment in February
for $107 million in an Alabama bankruptcy for a large debt
settlement law firm -- Allegro Law -- that was shut down by a judge
six years ago as a massive fraud.  

According to the report, now McCallan is telling a court in Florida
that he needs protection from that claim and other claims, via his
bankruptcy filing.

Court investigators in the Allegro case have been pursuing
McCallan, because his companies, Americorp and Seton Inc., provided
record-keeping and data services to Allegro, the report said.

A bankruptcy judge in Alabama had McCallan arrested and jailed for
a time, and declared that McCallan had committed a fraud on the
court, the report added.

Mr. McCallan, who owns a $1.5 million home on the coast, has been
ordered to turn over records related to the Allegro firm, the
report said.  McCallan claimed in court fillings that he did turn
over records, but investigators said the data was worthless and
incomplete, the report related.

Mr. McCallan will be represented in his Florida bankruptcy case by
attorney R. Scott Shuker, with Orlando-based Latham Shuker Eden &
Beaudine, the report further related.  Mr. Shuker said that
McCallan hadn't been represented in the Allegro case for the last
few months, the report added.

Timothy McCallan is the owner and chief executive officer of
AmeriCorp Inc., Seton Inc. and The Achievable Inc.  McCallan was
accused of masterminding a debt settlement scheme in which
customers were enticed into handing their money to entities
controlled by Mr. McCallan with a promise that their debts would be
either paid or settled.

Allegro Law, LLC, was founded by Keith Nelms in 2008 as a small
solo practice law firm but later became a front for McCallan's debt
settlement scheme.  Allegro Law filed a Chapter 7 case (Bankr. M.D.
Ala. Case No. 10-30631) in 2010.  Carly B. Wilkins was named
Chapter 7 trustee after Daniel G. Hamm retired in November 2015.

On Feb. 16, 2016, in the Chapter 7 case of Allegro Law, the
Bankruptcy Court entered judgment by default in favor of against
McCallan, AmieriCorp, Inc., and Seton Corp., in the amount of
$102,949,221, which were the total claims asserted by 5,214 victims
of the fraud.

Timothy McCallan's bankruptcy attorney:

         R. Scott Shuker
         LATHAM, SHUKER, EDEN & BEAUDINE, LLP
         111 North Magnolia Avenue, Suite 1400
         Orlando, Florida 32801
         Tel: (407) 481-5800
         Fax: (407) 481-5801
         E-mail: rshuker@iseblaw.com


TOWN & COUNTRY: Seeks Court Approval for Cash Collateral Use
------------------------------------------------------------
Town & Country Chimney Service, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maryland for authorization to use cash
collateral.

The Debtor seeks to use its cash collateral to meet its ordinary
and necessary  overhead expenses, including but not limited to
taxes, insurance, utilities, payroll, and routine and critical
vendors and suppliers.  The Debtor wants to maintain and preserve
the value of its assets for the benefit of its estate and
creditors.

The Debtor proposes to provide the creditors claiming an interest
in the cash collateral with adequate protection in the form of
adequate protection payments and replacement liens on the Debtor's
postpetition cash and accounts receivable.  The Debtor intends to
make monthly adequate protection payments to the IRS in the amount
of $378.09, to the Comptroller of Maryland in the amount of $64.28,
and to the State of Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and
Regulation in the amount of $275.96.

The creditors claiming an interest in the cash collateral are:

     (1) the Internal Revenue Service, for federal tax liens in the
amount of $29.46, filed on November 19, 2015; $752.86, filed on
April 19, 2016; $10,715.22, filed on August 2, 2016; and
$11,187.71, filed on August 24, 2016;

     (2) the Comptroller of Maryland, for a state tax lien in the
amount of $3,857; and

     (3) the State of Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and
Regulation, for a state tax lien in the amount of $16,557.30.

The Debtor tells the Court that without the use of cash collateral,
the value of its assets will immediately and substantially
diminish, and the Debtor will have no reasonable prospect of
continuing to operate as a going concern, preserving the value of
its assets, or presenting a plan in its case.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated November 21, 2016,
is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/Town&Country2016_1625263_13.pdf

Town & Country Chimney Service's counsel:

          Edward M. Miller, Esq.
          MILLER & MILLER, LLP
          39 N. Court St.
          Westminister, MD 21157
          Telephone: (410) 751-5444
          E-mail: mmllplawyers@verizon.net

                  About Town & Country Chimney Service

Town & Country Chimney Service, Inc., a Maryland corporation,
provides chimney cleaning and restoration services to commercial
and residential clients.  Annual gross revenues is $795,000.  Its
assets consist primarily of cash, a nominal amount of accounts
receivable, equipment, and vehicles.  The Company operates from a
leased space in Sykesville, Maryland.

Town & Country Chimney Service filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D. Md. Case No. 16-25263) on Nov. 17, 2016.  The Debtor is
represented by Edward M. Miller, Esq., at Miller & Miller, LLP.


TRIPLE C FLATBED: Creditors' Committee Seeks Ch. 11 Trustee
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed a motion asking
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to
direct the appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee for Triple C Flatbed
Holdings, LLC.

According to the Creditors' Committee, since the filing of the
Chapter 11 petition, the Debtor has continued to operate its
over-the-road trucking business as Debtor and
Debtor-in-Possession.

The Committee tells the Court that the Debtor's current management
does not have the requisite experience in the trucking industry to
effectively and profitable manage the Debtor. The Debtor's
performance to date, and its inability to secure adequate
replacement tractors, are indicative of the inability to manage the
Debtor's affairs, the Committee says.

The Committee adds that the Debtor's existing management has to
date been hostile to the Committee, and has rebuffed the efforts of
the Committee members to obtain accurate, detailed, and up-to-date
information regarding the Debtor's operations and its financial
performance.  Accordingly, the Committee feels that it is crucial,
especially in light of the imminent suspension of the Debtor's
operations, to appoint a Trustee to consider the Debtor's option
and the viability of entering into the US 1 Offer or such higher
and better offer as may come forward as part of the 363 sale
process.

Therefore, the Committee asks for an order directing the
appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee to manage the affairs of the
Debtor, bring expertise to its operations, and carefully consider
and negotiate with the US 1 Offer and either (i) pursue the US 1
Offer; or (ii) pursue other higher and better offers for the
Debtor's assets.

The Counsel, pending approval, for the Creditors' Committee is:

         John A. Thomson, Jr., Esq.
         COHEN POLLOCK MERLIN & SMALL, P.C.
         3350 Riverwood Parkway, SUite 1600
         Atlanta, GA 30339
         Tel. (770) 858-1288

                 About Triple C Flatbed Holdings

Triple C Flatbed Holdings, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.
Ga. Case No. 16-58984) on May 24, 2016.  The petition was signed by
Terry Comer, managing member.  The Debtor is represented by Michael
D. Robl, Esq., at The Spears & Robl Law Firm, LLC. Judge Paul
Baisier presides over the case.  The Debtor disclosed total assets
of $2.28 million and total debts of $2.72 million.


TUSCANY ENERGY: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Until Dec. 10
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Erik P. Kimball of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida authorized Tuscany Energy, LLC, to use
Armstrong Bank's cash collateral on an interim basis, through
December 10, 2016.

The Debtor was allowed to use cash collateral to pay for actual and
necessary ordinary course operating expenses consistent with the
approved Budget.  The approved Budget provides for total lease
operating expense in the amount of $53,526 and total administrative
expense in the amount of $5,464, covering the period from November
11, 2016, to December 10, 2016.  

Armstrong Bank was granted replacement liens to the same extent and
priority as its properly perfected security interest held
prepetition.

Judge Kimball, directed the Debtor to maintain the dollar value of
$141,000 in cash and $76,000 in accounts receivable so that on the
date of the Interim Hearing, the Debtor will have at least a total
of $217,000 in cash on hand and accounts receivable.

Judge Kimball further directed the Debtor to continue maintaining
insurance coverage in amounts and against risks as reasonably
required by Armstrong Bank, with such insurance policies reflecting
Armstrong Bank as loss payee and the U.S. Trustee as a notice
party.

An interim hearing on the Debtor's continued use of cash collateral
is scheduled on December 7, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

A full-text copy of the Eleventh Interim Order, dated November 22,
2016, is available at https://is.gd/QkpxG2

                          About Tuscany Energy, LLC.

Tuscany Energy LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 16-10398) on Jan. 11, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Donald Sider, manager.  The case is assigned
to Judge Erik P. Kimball.  The Debtor is represented by Bradley S.
Shraiberg, Esq., at Shraiberg, Ferrara, & Landau P.A.  At the time
of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets at $100,000 to $500,000
and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Tuscany Energy, LLC.


UNITED GAS: Amidi Buying Sacramento Assets for $2.9M
----------------------------------------------------
United Gas and Food, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of California to authorize the private sale of
real property located at 1451 Meadowview Rd., Sacramento,
California, the business located at the property, and related
personal property, to Mike Amidi and/or assignee for $2,900,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Dec. 6, 2016 at 10:30 a.m.

The Debtor is the owner of the property consisting of the land,
together with all buildings, improvements, easements and
appurtenances thereon and thereto.  The Debtor presently operates
the convenience store and Valero-branded retail motor fuel station
located at the property ("Business").

The Debtor desires to sell the property, the Business, the related
personal property used to operate the Business owned by Debtor and
exclusively used in the operation of the Business, and the fuel and
merchandise inventory, which is owned by Debtor and located at the
property ("Assets").

The secured debt on the Debtor's Assets is as follows: (1) Secured
claim of Merchants Bank of California, N.A. in the amount of
$1,535,856, as of Dec. 1, 2016; (2) Secured claim of the Internal
Revenue Service in the amount of $2,591; (3) Secured claim of
Insight Environmental, Inc. in the amount of $361,661; and, (4)
Secured claim of State Board of Equalization in the amount of
$25,321.

Pursuant to the terms of the confirmed Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization, all claims will be paid in full, in cash, from sale
of the Debtor's Assets.  The deadline for close of escrow on the
Assets is Dec. 31, 2016.  If escrow does not close by Dec. 31,
2016, the case will convert to Chapter 7.

The Debtor has been actively pursuing a sale of the property with
the aim to pay off amounts owed in accordance with the terms of the
Confirmed Plan.  To achieve this goal, in addition to employing its
own marketing efforts, the Debtor hired Westside Pacific Inc./LJ
Mismas to oversee the marketing and sale efforts of the property.
The Debtor has been working diligently with the Broker to locate a
purchaser for the property and achieve its primary goal of paying
all net proceeds from the sale in accordance with the terms of the
Confirmed Plan.

The Debtor accepted an offer and entered into a Standard Offer,
Agreement and Escrow Instructions for Purchase of Real Estate, and
Addendum(s) for the sale of the Assets free and clear of any
interest therein to Amidi and/or assignee for a total purchase
price of $2,900,000, to be paid by the Buyer in cash upon closing.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/United_Gas_120_Sales.pdf

The Agreement has no contingencies, has a close of escrow date of
Dec. 30, 2016 and simply needs the Court's approval.  The Broker
has had extensive communication with Buyer and is confident that
the transaction will close.  The Buyer has provided proof of funds
necessary to comply with the terms of the Agreement.

The property will be sold, transferred and conveyed by the Debtor
to the Buyer at the Closing free and clear of all encumbrances.

The Debtor believes the private sale efforts, upon considering the
extensive pre-petition sale efforts, have resulted in an
arms-length, fair value transaction which will result in payment of
all net proceeds from the sale in accordance with the terms of the
Confirmed Plan. Accordingly, the Debtor asks the Court to approve
the sale of Assets.

The Debtor asks that the Court enter an order waiving the 14-day
stay set forth in Rules 6004(g) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure and providing that the order granting the Motion be
immediately enforceable and that the closing under the Agreement
may occur immediately.

                     About United Gas and Food

United Gas and Food, Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.
Cal. Case No. 10-21453) on Jan. 22, 2010.  The case is assigned to
Judge Christopher M. Klein.

The Debtor estimated liabilities in the range of $1,000,001 to
$10,000,000.

The Debtor tapped John D. Maxey, Esq., at Dudugjian & Maxey as
counsel.

The petition was signed by Muhammad Latif, operator/manager of the
company.


UPPER ROOM BIBLE: Can Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jerry A. Brown of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Louisiana authorized The Upper Room Bible Church, Inc.
to use cash collateral in which the Internal Revenue Service may
claim to have an interest, on an interim basis.

The Debtor was authorized to use cash collateral exclusively for
the purposes of the disbursements set forth in the approved 13-Week
Budget.  The Budget reflects planned expenses of approximately
$113,902 and payroll expenses in the aggregate amount of $68,886,
covering the period beginning October 31, 2016 through January 29,
2017.

Judge Brown granted the IRS with adequate protection liens upon the
cash collateral, and the proceeds, products, rents, offspring, and
profits thereof to secure the amount of any post-petition
diminution in the value of IRS' interests in the cash collateral to
the extent such interests are entitled to adequate protection
against such diminution under the Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtor was directed to make monthly payments to the IRS in the
amount of $2,819.64 beginning November 21, 2016.

The Debtor's use of cash collateral will expire, on the earliest to
occur of:

      (a) the effective date of a plan confirmed under 11 U.S.C.
Section 1129;

      (b) the dismissal or conversion of this Chapter 11 case to a
case under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code; or

      (c) the appointment of a trustee or examiner under Bankruptcy
Code Section 1104.

A final hearing to consider the Debtor's request to use cash
collateral will be held on December 9, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order, dated November 22, 2016, is
available at  https://is.gd/f4ya5L


                        About The Upper Room Bible

The Upper Room Bible Church, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 16-12757), on November 8, 2016.    The
Petition was signed by  Herbert H. Rowe, Jr.   The Debtor is
represented by P. Douglas Stewart, Jr., Esq., Brandon A. Brown,
Esq., and Ryan J. Richmond, Esq., at Stewart Robbins & Brown, LLC.
At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
at $0 to $50,000.


UPPER ROOM BIBLE: Court Approves Stipulation With Entergy
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jerry A. Brown of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Louisiana approved the Stipulation by and
Between Entergy Louisiana, LLC, and The Upper Room Bible Church,
Inc., Concerning Adequate Assurance of Payment for Post-Petition
Electric Services.

The stipulation provided, among other things, that The Upper Room
will pay Entergy $4,565.00 within 10 days of The Upper Room's
execution of the stipulation for utility services provided by
Entergy prior to the petition date.  The Upper Room will also
timely pay all invoices from Entergy for post-petition services on
the date due, in full, and otherwise in accordance with the
applicable tariffs, rules, regulations and law governing Entergy's
provision of public utility services.

A full-text copy of Judge Brown's November 22, 2016 order is
available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/laeb16-12757-41.pdf

The Upper Room Bible Church, Inc. is represented by:

          Paul D. Stewart, Jr., Esq.
          620 Florida Street, Suite 100
          Post Office Box 2348
          Baton Rouge, LA 70821
          Tel: (225)231- 9998
          Email: dstewart@stewartrobbins.com

Entergy Louisiana, LLC is represented by:

          Sean D. Moore, Esq.
          639 Loyola Ave., Suite 2600
          New Orleans, LA 70113
          Tel: (504)576-7048
          Email: smoore6@entergy.com

                    About The Upper Room Bible

The Upper Room Bible Church, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 16-12757), on November 8, 2016, listing
under $1 million in assets and debts.  The Debtor is represented P.
Douglas Stewart, Jr., Esq., Brandon A. Brown, Esq., and Ryan J.
Richmond, Esq., at Stewart Robbins & Brown, LLC.


URANIUM ONE: Fitch Affirms 'BB-' LT FC Issuer Default Rating
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Canada-incorporated Uranium One Inc.'s
(U1) Long-Term Foreign Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at
'BB-'. The Outlook is Stable.

U1's IDR includes a three-notch uplift from its standalone 'B-'
assessment for support from its state-owned parent, JSC Atomic
Energy Power Corporation (Atomenergoprom, BBB-/Stable). “We view
the strategic and operational ties as strong between the two, but
note that more robust legal ties, eg, guarantees for a large
portion of U1's debt, would result in closer rating alignment.”
Fitch said.

"Soft uranium prices have resulted in a delay in U1's deleveraging,
which we originally expected by end-2017. As one of the lowest-cost
producers globally, the company is well placed to withstand the
current low price environment. Moreover, Atomenergoprom has
significantly increased its support, mainly through inter-group
loans to U1 that could account for nearly half of its debt at
end-2016. We are focusing on 2018-2019, when we expect the uranium
price and production cycle to be past its trough. This is reflected
in the affirmation despite U1's leverage exceeding our negative
guidance in 2017," Fitch said.

"Using triuranium octoxide (U3O8) spot prices of between USD24 per
pound (lb) in 2017 and USD28/lb in 2020, we expect U1's funds from
operations (FFO), including dividends from JVs, to improve in 2018
and its FFO adjusted gross leverage to approach 4x by end-2018,"
Fitch said.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Strategic Uranium Mining Asset

U1's low-cost U3O8 production is important for Atomenergoprom, the
world's leader in uranium fuel production, nuclear power plant
engineering, fabrication and construction, and a top nuclear power
utility. Atomenergoprom is an integral part of State Atomic Energy
Corporation Rosatom (Rosatom). With 39% of the global 2015 uranium
enrichment market share, Rosatom needs low-cost feedstock to
maintain enrichment margins and requires contracted uranium supply
to attract reactor customers.

U1 is one of the lowest-cost uranium producers globally and the
fourth-largest by attributable production volumes. Its production
comes from joint ventures (JVs) in Kazakhstan with JSC National
Atomic Company Kazatomprom (Kazatomprom, BBB-/Stable). U1 has an
off-take agreement with Rosatom for over half of its production,
predominantly at spot-based prices. As Rosatom's international
uranium marketing arm, it also has long-term off-take agreements
with customers worldwide.

'B-' Standalone Profile

U1's standalone creditworthiness is constrained by its small size,
dependence on production and dividends from the JVs,
single-commodity exposure, and high current FFO adjusted gross
leverage. U1 depends almost exclusively on dividends from JVs to
service debt. From 2016, the company has consolidated 70%-owned
SMCC and Betpak Dala JVs instead of using equity method accounting.
However, dividend payouts from the JVs should still be approved by
both U1 and Kazatomprom, as with other JVs.

In 9M16, U1 received USD118 million in dividends from JVs, up from
USD54 million a year ago. U1's JVs are generally debt-free and
distribute most of their free cash flow as dividends. In 2016, U1
expects total attributable production of 12.5 million lbs of U3O8,
flat yoy.

Low-Cost Production Beneficial

U1 mines nearly all of its uranium using the in-situ leaching or
recovery (ISR) method. In 3Q16, the company reported cash costs of
USD7/lb, compared with USD10/lb in 3Q15 and USD13/lb in 3Q14, down
on weak tenge and cost optimisation. In recent years, the company's
average realised uranium prices closely matched spot price,
distinguishing it from some other miners eg, Kazatomprom, which
sell their uranium at a mix of long-term and spot prices. However,
fixed contract prices and price floors have had a more pronounced
impact in the depressed price environment. U1's average realised
price in 3Q16 was USD30/lb, five dollars higher than the average
spot price.

Uranium Prices Remain Volatile

In November 2016, spot uranium prices reached a 12-year low of
USD18.5/lb. In 10M16, average spot prices fell to USD27/lb, down
from USD36.5/lb in 2015, as producers faced with lower volumes and
low-price bids continued to off-load abundant supplies. Uranium
stockpiles have reached over 1.4bn lbs, according to Ux Consulting
(UxC). In 2016, primary production and secondary supplies of 207m
lbs U308 are expected to exceed UxC's base case demand of 186m lbs
U308, including inventory build-up.

The reactor re-starts in Japan have taken much longer than the
industry anticipated. There are currently two operating reactors
there, in addition to five approved for re-start. UxC had expected
as many as 13 Japanese reactors online by end-2016. Globally, there
are 60 reactors under construction including 37 in Asia, mainly in
China, India, and South Korea.

Producers are responding by mothballing mines and cancelling
projects. In 2016, Canada's Cameco is suspending its Rabbit Lake
mine operations, and curtailing mines in Wyoming and Nebraska,
which will reduce net primary production by 5m lbs U3O8.
Australia's Paladin Energy is halting mining at Namibia's Langer
Heinrich and over the next two years will process lower grade
stockpiles there, reducing production by up to 1.0m-1.5m lbs U3O8
per year.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for U1 include:

   -- Increase in attributable uranium production to 13.5m lbs
      from 12.5m lbs in 2016.

   -- U3O8 spot prices of USD28/lb in 2016, USD24/lb in 2017 –
      2018, USD25/lb in 2019 and USD28/lb in 2020.

   -- Broadly stable USD/KZT exchange rate in 2016-2020 averaging
      1/330.

   -- Annual consolidated capex and other investments of USD35m.

   -- No dividend distributions to shareholders.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Positive: Future developments that could lead to positive rating
action include:

  -- Evidence of stronger legal linkage with the parent, ie,
     financial guarantees for a large portion of U1's debt, cross
     default provisions that included U1 or a higher share of
     U1's debt provided by the parent.

  -- Improved financial profile, e.g., FFO-adjusted gross
     leverage of below 3x and FFO fixed charge cover of at least  
     4x on a sustained basis, which would be positive for U1's
     standalone profile.

Negative: Future developments that could lead to negative rating
action include:

  -- Weakening linkage with the parent, eg, the inability to
     obtain timely refinancing from the parent company or its
     subsidiaries, which could result in Fitch reviewing the
     current level of parental support.

  -- Weak liquidity due to lower than expected dividends from JVs

     as a result of sustained depressed uranium prices.

  -- Failure to improve the financial profile by end-2018
     including FFO adjusted gross leverage of above 5x and FFO
     interest coverage of less than 2x based on uranium price
     assumptions, which would be negative for the standalone
     profile.

LIQUIDITY

Parent Funding Strengthens Liquidity

At September 30, 2016, U1 had USD220 million of unrestricted cash,
while its short-term debt included a USD34 million rouble bond
repayment plus a USD61 million FX swap payment on that bond.
Atomenergoprom provided U1 with a USD95 million loan to help pay
down these obligations.

The company plans to pre-repay its outstanding USD210 million
Eurobond due in 2018 later this year. Atomenergoprom has agreed to
provide an amortising three-year USD165m loan and a USD50m
short-term loan, at interest rates materially lower than the
Eurobond's coupon. Assuming that the Eurobond is repaid and the
USD50m credit line remains undrawn, we expect inter-group debt from
the parent to make up 45% of the total at end-2016. U1's remaining
third-party debt consists of a rouble bond due in 2020 with a
swap-adjusted principal equal to USD390 million.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Uranium One Inc.

   -- Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR: affirmed at 'BB-'; Outlook
      Stable

   -- Long-Term Local Currency IDR: affirmed at 'BB-'; Outlook
      Stable

   -- Short-Term Foreign Currency IDR: affirmed at 'B'

   -- Short-Term Local Currency IDR: affirmed at 'B'

   -- Senior unsecured rating: affirmed at 'BB-'

Uranium One Investments Inc.'s USD300 million 6.25% notes due 2018

   -- Senior unsecured rating: affirmed at 'BB-'Fitch Affirms
      Uranium One at 'BB-'; Outlook Stable


WALTER H. BOOTH: Wants to Use Ocwen Loan Servicing Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------------
Walter H. Booth Clause 4 Trust asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of New Hampshire for authorization to use cash
collateral, from Nov. 16, 2016 through Dec. 31, 2016.

The Debtor believes that its sole cash collateral lien holder is
secured creditor Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, which has a mortgage on
the Debtor's three and one half acre parcel of land with three
buildings, and an additional parcel of unbuildable land which abuts
the larger property.

The Debtor tells the Court that Ocwen Loan Servicing has a lien on
the Debtor's real estate.  The Debtor further tells the Court that
it has no cash with which to pay the mortgage and operating
expenses other than cash collateral.

The Debtor's proposed Budget provides for total expenses in the
amount of $10,043 for the period Dec. 1, 2016 to Dec. 31, 2016.

The Debtor proposes to grant Ocwen Loan Servicing with a
replacement lien on the estate's postpetition accounts receivable
and its cash proceeds.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Nov. 21, 2016, is
available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/WalterHBooth2016_1611598bah_10.pdf

A full-text copy of the Debtor's proposed Budget, dated Nov. 21,
2016, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/WalterHBooth2016_1611598bah_10_1.pdf

               About Walter H. Booth Clause 4 Trust

Walter H. Booth Clause 4 Trust is a business trust with mailing
address of P.O. Box 1077, Concord, New Hampshire.  The trust owns a
3.5-acre parcel of land with three buildings on the property.
There is an additional parcel of land which is an unbuildable
parcel of land, a "gully", which abuts the larger property.  The
trust has two co-trustees, Stephen W. Booth and David H. Booth.  

Walter H. Booth Clause 4 Trust filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D.N.H. Case No. 16-11598) on Nov. 16, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Stephen W. Booth, trustee.  The Debtor estimated assets
and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million at the time of the
filing.

The Debtor is represented by Eleanor Wm Dahar, Esq., at Victor W.
Dahar Professional Association.

No official committee has been appointed in the case.


WATERPROOFING UNLIMITED: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for Dec. 8
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of
Waterproofing Unlimited, Inc., at a hearing on December 8, at 10:00
a.m.

The hearing will be held at Courtroom 1, 100 N. Palafox Street,
Pensacola, Florida.

The court on November 8 conditionally approved Waterproofing's
disclosure statement, allowing the company to start soliciting
votes from creditors.

The order set a December 1 deadline for creditors to cast their
votes.  Objections to the plan must be filed seven days before the
hearing.

              About Waterproofing Unlimited, Inc.

Waterproofing Unlimited, Inc. is a corporation organized under the
laws of the State of Florida with its principal place of business
located at 103 Bass Ave, Fort Walton Beach, Florida.  It filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No.
16-30441) on May 11, 2016.  Teresa M. Dorr, Esq., at Zalkin
Revell, PLLC, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Debtor's case.


WILLIAM ALEX MCCLAIN: Unsecureds To Recoup 100% in 92 Payments
--------------------------------------------------------------
William Alex McClain, II, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida a disclosure statement referring
to the Debtor's plan of reorganization.

Class 7 will consist of allowed unsecured claims totaling
$183,426.05.  The Debtor will pay make monthly payments of no less
than $2,000 to Class 7 creditors to be disbursed on a pro rata
bases until class 7 creditors have been paid 100% of their claims
(approximately 92 payments).

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb16-10599-42.pdf

The Plan was filed by the Debtor's counsel:

     Susan D. Lasky, Esq.
     SUSAN D LASKY, PA
     915 Middle River Drive, Suite 420
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304
     Tel: (954) 400-7474
     Fax: (954) 206-0628
     E-mail: Sue@SueLasky.com

William Alex McClain, II, is a medical doctor employed by Hialeah
Anesthesia Spec, LLC, who primarily works in the operating room and
in "delivery" at Hialeah Hospital.  

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case No. 16-10599) on Jan. 14, 2016.


WILLIAM ERNST: Kang Buying DeRidder Property for $85K
-----------------------------------------------------
William Howard Ernst asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Lousiana to authorize the sale of real property located
at 1116 Lucius Drive, DeRidder, Louisiana, Beauregard Parish, to
Stephen Kang for $88,500.

The property, a family home, is subject to a real estate mortgage
in favor of The Three B's of SWLA, LLC and a federal restitution
lien filed by the US Government and Department of Justice against
coowner, Lisa Ernst.  Kang has agreed to purchase the property for
$88,500.

A copy of the Louisiana Residential Agreement to Buy or Sell
attached to the Motion is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/William_Ernst_81_Sales.pdf

The Debtor is requesting authority to sell the property free and
clear of all liens and mortgages and from the net proceeds he will
pay the secured creditor, The Three B's of SWLA, in full
satisfaction of its lien.  The Three B's of SWLA is owed the
approximate amount of $21,9378 (plus accrued interest and costs).
After paying the first mortgage creditor, the Debtor will retain
$35,000 as his homestead exemption and the balance which is
estimated at approximately $20,000 will be paid to Amerisafe, Inc.
and Hanover Insurance Co. in accordance with the Judgment in a
Criminal Case dated July 16, 2015 and filed on Aug. 3, 2015 in the
record of the matter entitled "United States of America vs. Lisa H.
Ernst" bearing case number 2:15-CR-00050-001 of the United States
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.

According to the Debtor, time is of the essence and it is in the
best interest of the estate that the time for filing objections be
shortened from 21 days to 15 days in order that the sale is not
delayed.  A separate motion will be filed requesting that the
notice delays be shortened.

The Purchaser can be reached at:

          Stephen Kang
          164 Robert Bucks Rd.
          DeRidder, LA 70634
          Cellular: (407) 388-4609
          Telephone: (337) 531-8080
          E-mail: starboardwatch256@gmail.com

Counsel for the Debtor:

          Gerald J. Casey, Esq.
          613 Alamo St.
          Lake Charles, LA 70601
          Telephone: (337) 474-5005  

William Howard Ernst sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. La.
Case No. 16-20053) on Jan. 25, 2016.


WILLMAN CONSTRUCTION: Unsecureds To Be Fully Paid in 10Yrs. at 3.2%
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Willman Construction, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Iowa an amended disclosure statement
dated Nov. 11, 2016, referring to the Debtor's plan of
reorganization.

Class 3 General Unsecured Creditors are impaired by the Plan.
Holders of Class 3 claims will be paid in full over 120 months from
the effective date of the Plan at 3.25% per annum.  Payments will
be made quarterly, with the first payment due by the end of the
quarter starting with the quarter after the quarter ending which
included the effective date of the Plan.

The Debtor faces substantial and daunting problems.  It has a tax
lien, union obligations, and a substantial body of unsecured
creditors.  It is working without a line of credit.  However, the
Debtor has substantial contracts ongoing.  It is in substantial
demand with large contractors in and around the Quad Cities and
region.  While the Debtor has oftentimes acted as a general
contractor in the past, it has been acting primarily as a
subcontractor on many jobs.

As of date of filing, the Debtor's accounts receivable stood at
$229,000.  The work-in-process billed and to be billed now stands
at $3.9 million.

The Debtor is operated by Mark and Ellen Willman.  No one else can
operate the business.  Matthew Willman has assisted, along with the
other related entity, Tri-State Construction, Inc.  Tri-State has
primarily serviced Oscar Mayer/Kraft, but it has expanded after the
Carpenters dispute.  It is a non-union shop.  The Debtor is union.
Tri-State has now contracted.

The Debtor will continue to carefully bid, work with its trusted
partners and improve its margin.  If Tri-State ceased operations,
its few assets would go to its unsecured creditors -- or their
value.  The Debtor would be the only contractor eligible to take
over the Kraft contract.

The Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/iasb16-00774-153.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 20, 2016, the
Debtor filed with the Court a disclosure statement dated Aug. 22,
2016, describing the Debtor's Chapter 11 plan, which is based upon
the assumption that the liquidation of the Debtor's assets would
not provide full payment to all of its secured creditors, much less
its unsecured creditors, nor meaningful payments to general
unsecured creditors.  The unsecured claims will be paid from net
income and asset sales, if any, after the satisfaction of all
administrative claims, including U.S. Trustee's fees and attorneys'
fees and accounting fees for the Debtor and concomitantly with
secured class.  Asset sales are unlikely, but not ruled out and
would be subject to any lien.

              About Willman Construction, Inc.

Willman Construction, Inc., filed bankruptcy petitions (Bankr.
S.D.Ia. Lead Case No. 16-00774) on April 15, 2016.  The petitions
were signed by Mark Willman, authorized representative.  Judge Lee
M. Jackwig is assigned to the cases.

Willman Construction scheduled $521,700 in total assets and
$1,200,000 in total liabilities as of the petition date.

The Debtors have hired Katz Nowinski PC as counsel, and Honkamp
Krueger & Co, PC, as accountants.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 12 on April 28, 2016,
appointed four creditors of Willman Construction, Inc., to serve on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.


XTERA COMMUNICATIONS: U.S. Trustee Forms 5-Member Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Nov. 23 appointed five creditors
to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 cases of Xtera Communications, Inc., and its affiliates.


The committee members are:

     (1) Nexans Norway, AS
         Attn: Anne-Lise Aukner
         Innsputen 9
         PO Box 6450, No. 0605
         Oslo, Norway
         Phone: +47-22886198

     (2) MC Assembly
         Attn: Mark McReynolds
         425 North Drive
         Melbourne, FL 32934
         Phone: 321-409-4718

     (3) NSG Technology, Inc.
         Attn: Peggy Chen
         1705 Junction Court, Suite 200
         San Jose, CA 95112  
         Phone: 408-547-8800
         Fax: 408-573-7171

     (4) Morgan Franklin Consulting, LLC
         Attn: Eric Reicin
         7900 Tysons One Place
         Suite 300, McLean VA 22102
         Phone: 703-564-7525
         Fax: 703-563-9351

     (5) Axsun Technologies, Inc.
         Attn: Christopher Baldwin
         1 Fortune Drive
         Billerica, MA 01821
         Phone: 978-439-3402

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense. They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs. Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

                   About Xtera Communications

Xtera Communications and seven affiliated debtors filed for Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 16-12577) on Nov. 15,
2016.  The Company sells telecommunications-related optical
transport solutions.  The Company disclosed $50.47 million in
assets and $66.45 million in total debt as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Company tapped Stuart Brown of DLA Piper as counsel; Cowen &
Company as investment banker; and Epiq Systems Inc. as claims
agent.


YELLOW CAB: U.S. Trustee Directed to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas E. Carlson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California enters an Order directing the U.S.
Trustee to appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee for Yellow Cab Cooperative,
Inc., aka All Taxi Electronics.

The Order was made pursuant to the hearing conducted on November
15, 2016.

As previously reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed a motion asking the
Court to appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee in the Debtor's bankruptcy
case.

According to the Committee, the Debtor is guilty of significant
prepetition malfeasance -- malfeasance that can only be described
as intentional as it involved transferring money to equity when
none was due or owing and at a time when the Debtor was insolvent.
Since the case began, the Debtor's conflicts of interest have
caused management to make decisions that are not in the best
interests of the Debtor, the Committee asserts.

Therefore, the Committee asks the Court to enter an order (i)
granting the Motion, (ii) directing the appointment of a chapter
11
trustee in the Debtor's case, and (iii) granting such and further
relief as may be just and appropriate.

                   About Yellow Cab Cooperative

Yellow Cab Cooperative, Inc., provides taxicab transportation
services in the San Francisco, California area. In San Francisco,
taxicab "color schemes" are licensed by the County of San
Francisco to provide services to taxi medallion owners, which color
schemes and medallion holders operate in a highly regulated
environment.  

Yellow Cab is a non-profit cooperative service company that
provides an operating base for approximately 400 San Francisco taxi
medallions (or permits), operating on a cooperative basis.  Yellow
Cab supports approximately 1,000 medallion owners and lessee
drivers in their individual taxi operations, and separately employs
approximately 60 persons to provide those support services. Yellow
Cab currently supports approximately one-third of the total
medallions operating in San Francisco.

Yellow Cab Cooperative filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.
Cal. Case No. 16-30063) on Jan. 22, 2016. The petition was signed
by Pamela Martinez, president.  The case is assigned to Judge
Dennis Montali.

The Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million, and debts
of $10 million to $50 million.

The Debtor has tapped Farella Braun and Martel LLP as its legal
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 17 on March 3 appointed five creditors
of Yellow Cab Cooperative, Inc., to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors.  The Committee is represented by John D.
Fiero, Esq., and Jason H. Rosell, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl &
Jones LLP, in San Francisco, California.


YESHIVA OHEL MOSHE: Unsecured Creditors to Get Up to $506K
----------------------------------------------------------
Yeshiva Ohel Moshe filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York an amended disclosure statement
explaining her proposed plan to exit Chapter 11 protection.

According to the latest disclosure statement, certain of the
Debtor's largest creditors are expected to defer or waive payments.
The Debtor anticipates that payments to Class 4 general unsecured
creditors on the effective date of the plan will not exceed
$506,000.

Under the plan, Class 4 general unsecured creditors will receive
payment in full in cash of the allowed amount of their claims on
the effective date, plus interest.

Class 4 general unsecured creditors assert a total of $980,658 in
claims, according to the latest disclosure statement filed on
November 3.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at
https://is.gd/LYDT0S

The Debtor is represented by:

     Mark A. Frankel
     Backenroth Frankel & Krinsky LLP
     800 Third Avenue
     New York, NY 10022
     Tel: (212) 593-1100
     Fax: (212) 644-0544

                     About Yeshiva Ohel Moshe

Led by Rabbi Dov Machlis, Yeshiva Ohel Moshe is a non-profit
religious corporation founded in 1929 serving low income
Bensonhurst families.  It operates a synagogue with 400-500
congregants, as well as a school, which provides general and Judaic
studies to up to 100 students from pre-kindergarten through eighth
grade.  The Yeshiva operates from its building at 7914 Bay Parkway,
Brooklyn, New York.

Yeshiva Ohel Moshe filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Case No. 16-43681) on August 17, 2016.


ZAIDA BROWN: Unsecured Creditors to Get $279 Each in 6 Years
------------------------------------------------------------
Zaida Brown has filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut her proposed plan to exit Chapter 11
protection.

The restructuring plan proposes to pay each Class 3 unsecured
creditor holding an allowed non-priority claim its pro rata share
of $11.65, without interest, for six years for a total of $279.71.

Payments will be made on a quarterly basis starting 60 days after
the effective date of the plan.

Allowed unsecured non-priority claims are estimated at $109,426.

The Debtor intends to primarily use her income from her rental
properties to fund payments under the plan, according to her
disclosure statement dated November 8.  A copy of the disclosure
statement is available for free at https://is.gd/MeIfJp

The Debtor is represented by:

     Reine C. Boyer, Esq.
     Law Offices of Reine C. Boyer, LLC
     1000 Lafayette Blvd., 11th Floor
     Bridgeport, CT 06604
     Tel: (203) 332-5900
     Fax: (203) 332-5901

                        About Zaida Brown

Zaida Brown owns several multifamily and single-family properties
in Connecticut.  Because of a reduced income partly due to the loss
of tenants, the Debtor fell behind on payments on the mortgage for
her residence in Norwalk, Connecticut, and the rental properties.
As a result, seven foreclosure actions were filed against her.  The
Debtor filed for bankruptcy protection to save her properties.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 16-50053) on January 12, 2016.


[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from Nov. 21 to 25, 2016
-------------------------------------------------------
  Company                   Ticker  Coupon Bid Price   Maturity
  -------                   ------  ------ ---------   --------
A. M. Castle & Co           CAS       7.00     58.00 12/15/2017
Affinion Investments LLC    AFFINI   13.50     57.00  8/15/2018
Alpha Appalachia
  Holdings Inc              ANR       3.25      5.50   8/1/2015
American Eagle Energy Corp  AMZG     11.00     12.75   9/1/2019
American Eagle Energy Corp  AMZG     11.00     12.75   9/1/2019
American Gilsonite Co       AMEGIL   11.50     63.25   9/1/2017
American Gilsonite Co       AMEGIL   11.50     62.50   9/1/2017
Aurora Diagnostics
  Holdings LLC / Aurora
  Diagnostics
  Financing Inc             ARDX     10.75     76.50  1/15/2018
Avaya Inc                   AVYA     10.50     40.00   3/1/2021
Avon Products Inc           AVP       4.20    104.04  7/15/2018
Avon Products Inc           AVP       5.75    104.63   3/1/2018
BPZ Resources Inc           BPZR      6.50      3.02   3/1/2015
BPZ Resources Inc           BPZR      6.50      3.02   3/1/2049
Basic Energy Services Inc   BAS       7.75     46.00  2/15/2019
Basic Energy Services Inc   BAS       7.75     46.00 10/15/2022
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc          CZR      12.75     63.75  4/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc          CZR       5.75     65.00  10/1/2017
Chassix Holdings Inc        CHASSX   10.00      8.00 12/15/2018
Chassix Holdings Inc        CHASSX   10.00      8.00 12/15/2018
Chukchansi Economic
  Development Authority     CHUKCH    9.75     40.63  5/30/2020
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       9.00     48.98  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE      10.50     59.63   6/1/2017
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       8.88     14.75  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       7.75     11.75   6/1/2020
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       9.00     50.00  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       9.00     48.63  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       7.75     11.75   6/1/2020
Creditcorp                  CRECOR   12.00     65.00  7/15/2018
Creditcorp                  CRECOR   12.00     65.00  7/15/2018
Cumulus Media Holdings Inc  CMLS      7.75     43.25   5/1/2019
Curo Group Holdings Corp    SPEEDY   12.00     48.75 11/15/2017
Curo Group Holdings Corp    SPEEDY   12.00     48.50 11/15/2017
EPL Oil & Gas Inc           EXXI      8.25     15.30  2/15/2018
EXCO Resources Inc          XCO       7.50     51.63  9/15/2018
Eagle Rock Energy
  Partners LP /
  Eagle Rock Energy
  Finance Corp              VNR       8.38     44.88   6/1/2019
Emerald Oil Inc             EOX       2.00      0.10   4/1/2019
Emerson Electric Co         EMR       5.13     99.92  12/1/2016
Endeavour
  International Corp        END      12.00      1.00   6/1/2018
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc               ENER      3.00      7.88  6/15/2013
Energy Future
  Holdings Corp             TXU       6.55     19.00 11/15/2034
Energy Future
  Holdings Corp             TXU       6.50     52.00 11/15/2024
Energy Future
  Holdings Corp             TXU      11.25     14.38  11/1/2017
Energy Future
  Holdings Corp             TXU      10.88     14.38  11/1/2017
Energy Future
  Holdings Corp             TXU       9.75     28.50 10/15/2019
Energy Future
  Holdings Corp             TXU      10.88     14.38  11/1/2017
Energy Future
  Intermediate Holding
  Co LLC / EFIH
  Finance Inc               TXU      10.00     23.25  12/1/2020
Energy Future
  Intermediate Holding
  Co LLC / EFIH
  Finance Inc               TXU      10.00     24.25  12/1/2020
Energy Future
  Intermediate Holding
  Co LLC / EFIH
  Finance Inc               TXU       9.75     30.00 10/15/2019
Energy Future
  Intermediate Holding
  Co LLC / EFIH
  Finance Inc               TXU       6.88     23.38  8/15/2017
Energy XXI Gulf Coast Inc   EXXI      9.25     13.25 12/15/2017
Energy XXI Gulf Coast Inc   EXXI      7.50     13.00 12/15/2021
Energy XXI Gulf Coast Inc   EXXI      7.75     13.88  6/15/2019
Energy XXI Gulf Coast Inc   EXXI      6.88     13.88  3/15/2024
Erickson Inc                EAC       8.25     37.75   5/1/2020
Evergreen Solar Inc         ESLR      4.00      0.42  7/15/2013
FXCM Inc                    FXCM      2.25     43.25  6/15/2018
FairPoint
  Communications Inc/Old    FRP      13.13      1.88   4/2/2018
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc   FLTW     14.00      3.56 12/15/2011
Forbes Energy Services Ltd  FESL      9.00     29.00  6/15/2019
GenOn Energy Inc            GENONE    7.88     73.65  6/15/2017
Goodman Networks Inc        GOODNT   12.13     43.00   7/1/2018
Goodrich Petroleum Corp     GDPM      8.88      0.55  3/15/2019
Gymboree Corp/The           GYMB      9.13     48.50  12/1/2018
Harsco Corp                 HSC       5.75    105.98  5/15/2018
Homer City Generation LP    GE        8.14     41.50  10/1/2019
Honeywell
  International Inc         HON       5.30    101.28  3/15/2017
Horsehead Holding Corp      ZINC     10.50     80.25   6/1/2017
Illinois Power
  Generating Co             DYN       7.00     35.00  4/15/2018
Illinois Power
  Generating Co             DYN       6.30     34.66   4/1/2020
Iracore International
  Holdings Inc              IRACOR    9.50     51.75   6/1/2018
Iracore International
  Holdings Inc              IRACOR    9.50     51.75   6/1/2018
IronGate Energy
  Services LLC              IRONGT   11.00     28.50   7/1/2018
IronGate Energy
  Services LLC              IRONGT   11.00     27.13   7/1/2018
IronGate Energy
  Services LLC              IRONGT   11.00     27.13   7/1/2018
IronGate Energy
  Services LLC              IRONGT   11.00     27.13   7/1/2018
Jack Cooper Holdings Corp   JKCOOP    9.25     39.50   6/1/2020
Kellwood Co                 KWD       7.63     74.88 10/15/2017
Key Energy Services Inc     KEGX      6.75     24.50   3/1/2021
LIN Television Corp         MEG       6.38    103.61  1/15/2021
Las Vegas Monorail Co       LASVMC    5.50      5.25  7/15/2019
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       2.00      2.59   3/3/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59  9/16/2010
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59  8/17/2014
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       4.00      2.59  4/30/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59  9/16/2010
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       2.07      2.59  6/15/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59   6/9/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59 10/17/2013
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59  8/17/2014
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.38      2.59  6/15/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59  11/2/2011
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.50      2.59  3/29/2013
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59  7/21/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59  11/3/2011
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.60      2.59  11/5/2011
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.25      2.59  3/22/2012
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.25      2.59   8/5/2012
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       5.00      2.59   2/7/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59  3/29/2014
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59  12/9/2012
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.25      2.59   2/6/2014
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.00      2.59   9/7/2012
Lehman Brothers Inc         LEH       7.50      1.23   8/1/2026
Light Tower Rentals Inc     LHTTWR    8.13     45.50   8/1/2019
Light Tower Rentals Inc     LHTTWR    8.13     43.00   8/1/2019
Linc USA GP / Linc
  Energy Finance USA Inc    LNCAU     9.63     19.63 10/31/2017
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE      8.63     32.50  4/15/2020
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE      6.50     32.25  5/15/2019
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE      6.25     32.25  11/1/2019
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE      7.75     32.00   2/1/2021
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE      6.50     31.75  9/15/2021
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE      6.25     31.88  11/1/2019
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE      6.25     31.88  11/1/2019
MBIA Insurance Corp         MBI      12.14     33.00  1/15/2033
MF Global Holdings Ltd      MF        3.38     21.00   8/1/2018
MModal Inc                  MODL     10.75     10.13  8/15/2020
Memorial Production
  Partners LP / Memorial
  Production Finance Corp   MEMP      7.63     34.88   5/1/2021
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC          MPO      10.75      0.63  10/1/2020
Modular Space Corp          MODSPA   10.25     52.50  1/31/2019
Modular Space Corp          MODSPA   10.25     52.00  1/31/2019
NRG REMA LLC                GENONE    9.24     80.00   7/2/2017
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp          NGREFN   12.25      2.27  5/15/2019
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp          NGREFN   12.25      2.27  5/15/2019
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp          NGREFN   12.25      2.27  5/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc      JNY       8.25     17.00  3/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc      JNY       6.13     16.50 11/15/2034
Nine West Holdings Inc      JNY       6.88     17.88  3/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc      JNY       8.25     19.00  3/15/2019
Nuverra Environmental
  Solutions Inc             NESC      9.88      8.50  4/15/2018
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC        OMX       5.54      9.50  1/29/2020
Optima Specialty Steel Inc  OPTSTL   12.50     90.00 12/15/2016
Optima Specialty Steel Inc  OPTSTL   12.50     88.42 12/15/2016
Orexigen Therapeutics Inc   OREX      2.75     21.00  12/1/2020
Overseas Private
  Investment Corp           OPIC      0.49    100.00  6/15/2017
Overseas Private
  Investment Corp           OPIC      0.49     99.90 12/15/2033
Permian Holdings Inc        PRMIAN   10.50     29.25  1/15/2018
Permian Holdings Inc        PRMIAN   10.50     28.50  1/15/2018
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc              PTX       4.25     23.63   4/1/2021
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc              PTX       4.25     23.30   4/1/2021
Prospect Holding Co LLC /
  Prospect Holding
  Finance Co                PRSPCT   10.25     29.63  10/1/2018
Prospect Holding Co LLC /
  Prospect Holding
  Finance Co                PRSPCT   10.25     29.63  10/1/2018
Rex Energy Corp             REXX      8.88     39.65  12/1/2020
River Rock
  Entertainment Authority   RIVER     9.00     19.88  11/1/2018
Rolta LLC                   RLTAIN   10.75     22.25  5/16/2018
SAExploration Holdings Inc  SAEX     10.00     46.25  7/15/2019
Safeway Inc                 SWY       3.40     99.91  12/1/2016
Samson Investment Co        SAIVST    9.75      4.13  2/15/2020
Sequa Corp                  SQA       7.00     56.00 12/15/2017
Sequa Corp                  SQA       7.00     55.50 12/15/2017
Sidewinder Drilling Inc     SIDDRI    9.75      7.50 11/15/2019
Sidewinder Drilling Inc     SIDDRI    9.75      6.00 11/15/2019
SquareTwo Financial Corp    SQRTW    11.63     20.25   4/1/2017
Starbucks Corp              SBUX      0.88     99.99  12/5/2016
Stone Energy Corp           SGY       1.75     62.00   3/1/2017
SunEdison Inc               SUNE      5.00     52.00   7/2/2018
SunEdison Inc               SUNE      2.00      3.00  10/1/2018
SunEdison Inc               SUNE      2.38      3.25  4/15/2022
SunEdison Inc               SUNE      2.75      3.13   1/1/2021
SunEdison Inc               SUNE      0.25      3.25  1/15/2020
SunEdison Inc               SUNE      3.38      4.00   6/1/2025
SunEdison Inc               SUNE      2.63      3.25   6/1/2023
TMST Inc                    THMR      8.00     10.73  5/15/2013
Talos Production LLC /
  Talos Production
  Finance Inc               TALPRO    9.75     47.00  2/15/2018
Talos Production LLC /
  Talos Production
  Finance Inc               TALPRO    9.75     47.00  2/15/2018
TerraVia Holdings Inc       TVIA      5.00     41.00  10/1/2019
TerraVia Holdings Inc       TVIA      6.00     51.50   2/1/2018
Terrestar Networks Inc      TSTR      6.50     10.00  6/15/2014
TetraLogic
  Pharmaceuticals Corp      TLOG      8.00      4.25  6/15/2019
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC /
  TCEH Finance Inc          TXU      11.50     31.00  10/1/2020
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC /
  TCEH Finance Inc          TXU      15.00      0.72   4/1/2021
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC /
  TCEH Finance Inc          TXU      11.50     28.63  10/1/2020
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC /
  TCEH Finance Inc          TXU      15.00      6.83   4/1/2021
Trans-Lux Corp              TNLX      8.25     20.13   3/1/2012
Triangle USA
  Petroleum Corp            TPLM      6.75     25.01  7/15/2022
Triangle USA
  Petroleum Corp            TPLM      6.75     25.01  7/15/2022
UCI International LLC       UCII      8.63     21.38  2/15/2019
Venoco LLC                  VQ        8.88      1.27  2/15/2019
Verso Paper Holdings
  LLC / Verso
  Paper Inc                 VRS      11.75     17.00  1/15/2019
Verso Paper Holdings
  LLC / Verso Paper Inc     VRS      11.75     17.00  1/15/2019
Violin Memory Inc           VMEM      4.25     32.00  10/1/2019
W&T Offshore Inc            WTI       8.50     43.38  6/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG      9.50      0.01 10/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG      8.50      0.36  4/15/2021
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG      9.50      0.49 10/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG      9.50      0.49 10/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG      9.50      0.49 10/15/2019
iHeartCommunications Inc    IHRT     10.00     72.50  1/15/2018
rue21 inc                   RUE       9.00     27.55 10/15/2021
rue21 inc                   RUE       9.00     28.50 10/15/2021


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2016.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***