TCR_Public/160912.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, September 12, 2016, Vol. 20, No. 256

                            Headlines

1601 W. SUNNYSIDE: Selling Scottsdale Condo Unit for $125K
2013 COLONIAL: Maltz to Auction Bronx Property
5 STAR INVESTMENT: Trustee Selling Mishawaka Property for $42K
5 STAR INVESTMENT: Trustee Selling Mishawaka Property for $88K
ABENGOA BIOENERGY: Claims Bar Date Set for September 28

ABENGOA BIOENERGY: Creditors' Panel Taps MelCap as Advisor
ADA GIRON: Sale of 2851 Property to Masons for $75K Approved
ADA GIRON: Sale of 2853 Property to Masons for $100K Approved
ADVANCED MICRO: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' CCR,Outlook Stable
AIR CANADA: S&P Raises CCR to 'BB-'; Outlook Stable

ALGODON WINES: Accumulated Deficit Raises Going Concern Doubt
ALLISON TRANSMISSION: Moody's Gives Ba3 Sr Unsecured Notes Rating
ART AND ARCHITECTURE: Court Allows Jones Day $59K Admin Claim
ASPEN GROUP: Inks $3 Million Credit Agreement With Leon Cooperman
ATLANTIC & PACIFIC: Sale of Assets to Romano for $350K Approved

AVANTOR PERFORMANCE: Moody's Hikes Corporate Family Rating to B1
BANNER GLASS: Tiger Capital to Auction Assets on Sept. 20
BASIC ENERGY: Lenders Temporarily Waive Term Loan Default
BEAZER HOMES: Announces Preliminary Operating Results
BEAZER HOMES: S&P Assigns 'B-' Rating on Proposed $300MM Notes

BELIEVER'S BIBLE: Wants to Use Rehabber's Cash Collateral
BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS: Borrows Add'l $1 Million from WAVI Holdings
BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS: T. Girschweiler Owns 30.2% Stake as of Aug. 31
BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS: WAVI Holding Holds 39.5% Stake as of Aug. 25
BIOSTAGE INC: Recurring Losses Raises Going Concern Doubt

BLACKBOARD INC: Moody's Affirms B2 Corporate Family Rating
BON-TON STORES: Incurs $38.7 Million Net Loss in July 30 Quarter
BORDER EXPRESS: Seeks to Employ Sparkman Shepard as Attorneys
BORDER EXPRESS: Wants Unsecured Financing for Sept. 7 Payroll
BOREAL WATER: Expects to Close Water Agreement by Oct. 7

BOULEVARD ENTERTAINMENT: Taps Demetra Gregory-McKie as Bookkeeper
BREMAR DEVELOPMENT: Hires Stearns Weaver as Counsel
BROOKLYN RENAISSANCE: Court Narrows Claims in JJCC Suit
BUFFINGTON MASON: Sale of Texas Property for $3.5M Approved
CAPITOL BC RESTAURANTS: Taps Best Buy as Auctioneer

CCH JOHN EAGAN: Oct. 19 Plan Confirmation Hearing
CHC GROUP: Hires Sage-Popovich as Inventory Appraisers
CHICAGO ROAD: Wants to Employ Thomas W. Lynch P.C. as Counsel
CHRISTOPHER COLLINS: Oct. 13 Plan Confirmation Hearing
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN RIDGEWAY: Sept. 19 Disclosure Statement Hearing

CHURCH HILL: Seeks Authorization to Use FTB Cash Collateral
CLEAR CREEK RETIREMENT: U.S. Trustee Forms 5-Member Committee
COBALT INTERNATIONAL: Employs Legal and Financial Advisors
COLUCCI TILE: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended to Oct. 10
COMSTOCK RESOURCES: S&P Lowers Rating on Sr. Secured Notes to 'D'

CONGREGATION ACHPRETVIA: Wants Jan. 11 Plan Exclusivity Extension
CORNED BEEF EXPRESS: Hires Robinson Brog as Counsel
CORNERSTONE TOWER: Seeks Nov. 9 Plan Exclusivity Extension
DAVID FAIRWEATHER: U.S. Trustee Directed to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
DELL TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Assigns 'BB+' CCR, Outlook Stable

DODGE CITY VETERINARY: Wants Nov. 7 Plan Exclusivity Extension
DOMINION STEEL: Hires Waldron & Schneider as General Counsel
DOMINION STEEL: Names William West as Accountant
DRM SALES: Online Auction of Assets on Oct. 15 Approved
DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' CCR; Outlook Stable

EDUARDO MENDOZA: Hires Nelson Robles-Diaz as Counsel
EMR ELECTRIC: Asks for Sept. 27 Plan Filing Period Extension
ENERGY FUTURE: Computershare Says Outline Vague on Make-Whole Term
ENERGY FUTURE: Plan Outline Fuzzy on Make-Whole Claims, DTC Says
ENERGY FUTURE: Selling 36-Acre North Main Property for $2.77M

ESTEPHAN G SARKIS: Unsecureds Likely To Recoup 100% Under Plan
ESTEPHAN SARKIS: Ch. 11 Plan Proposes $60K Payment to Unsecureds
FINTON CONSTRUCTION: Can Use Cash Collateral Through Sept. 28
FLINTKOTE COMPANY: 3rd Circuit Won't Rehear Ruling Frederick Case
FLORIDA GLASS: Names Leon Williamson as Counsel

FOUR DIA: Wants to Use CapitalSpring Cash Collateral
FPMI SOLUTIONS: Auction of Excess Furniture and Equipment Approved
FREEFALL ADVENTURES: Robair Offers $20K for Beech 95-B55 Airplane
GEI HOLDINGS: Selling Three New Jersey Properties for $783K
GENERAL PRODUCTS: Hilco to Auction Russellville Assets

GEORGE HENRY: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 10% Under Plan
GLORI ENERGY: Decrease in Cash Raises Substantial Doubt
GLOYD GREEN: Selling Midway Cabin to West for $414K
GREYSTONE LOGISTICS: Reports Record Sales for Fiscal 2016
GULFMARK OFFSHORE: Joined Barclays CEO Energy Power Conference

HAGGEN HOLDINGS: Committee Sues Comvest for Asset-Stripping
HALCON RESOURCES: Wins Confirmation of Chapter 11 Plan
HANCOCK FABRICS: Selling De Minimis Assets to Datamax for $118K
HANJIN SHIPPING: Troubles Leave $14-Bil. in Cargo Stranded at Sea
HARRINGTON & KING: Has Interim Nod to Use Inland Bank Cash

HECK INDUSTRIES: Has Until October 26 to File Chapter 11 Plan
HOMETOWN HARDWARE: Has Until Sept. 13 to Use Cash Collateral
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES: Tender Offer & Consent Solicitation Expire
J&E LAND: Pearce to Auction Two Shopping Centers on Oct. 13
JACKSON MASONRY: Selling Nashville Property for $475K

JACOB KOBY KHAKSHOURI: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
JAMES ALFORD: Plan Confirmation Hearing on Oct. 25
JAMES ANTHONY DEAL: Dec. 1 Plan Confirmation Hearing
JAMES EMERSON DAVIS: Court Overrules Objection to Claim #4
JEFF BENFIELD: Can Use Cash Collateral Until Sept. 21

KARLEE COMPANY: SSG Acted as Co-Investment Banker in Asset Sale
KEMET CORP: Unit Winds Down KFM's Operations
KIDS ONLY II OF LAFAYETTE: Objects to RREF Disclosures, Ch. 11 Plan
KIDS ONLY III OF LAFAYETTE: Objects to RREF-Proposed Ch. 11 Plan
LAW-DEN NURSING: Repair Ongoing, 1st PCO Report Says

LBJ HEALTHCARE: Care Within Standards, PCO 2nd Report Says
LDI MANAGEMENT: Can Use IRS Cash Collateral on Final Basis
LEO MOTORS: Equity Ownership in LGM Down to 81.8%
LIFE PARTNERS: Locke Lord Should be DQ'd, Vida Says
LIZA HAZAN: Amended Plan Proposes 41%-100% Recovery for Unsecureds

LONG-DEI LIU: No Issues for July-August, 2nd PCO Report Says
LUCAS ENERGY: Alan Dreeben Holds 11.6% Stake as of Aug. 25
LUCAS ENERGY: Ilios Oil Reports 9.2% Equity Stake as of Aug. 25
LUCAS ENERGY: Scott Lake, et al., Hold 5.3% Stake as of Aug. 25
LUSIGNAN SECURITY: Has Until Nov. 3 to Use Cash Collateral

MAGNESIUM CORP: District Court Won't Halt $26.2M Sale
MARK DEQUESNAY: Oct. 13 Plan Confirmation Hearing
MARVIN FLICKER: Sale of Camono Property for $1.2M Approved
MCGEE EQUIPMENT: Western Objects to Treatment of Claim Under Plan
MDI CREATIVE: To Sell Millwork, Furniture Units to Fund Ch. 11 Plan

METROPOLITAB BAPTIST: Sale of DC Condo Unit for $435K Approved
MICHAEL JOSEPH KILROY: Disclosure Statement Hearing Oct. 5
MIX 1 LIFE: To Acquire 100% of BMP's Interest in Brand Assets
MOLYCORP INC: Has Court OK to Tap Excess Insurance Policy
MORGANS HOTEL: Amends Schedule 13E-3 Transaction Statement

NAMAL ENTERPRISES: TD Bank Wants to Prohibit Cash Collateral Use
NEPHROGENEX INC: Proposes Protocol for Sale of All Assets
NORFE GROUP: Needs Until Nov 13 to File Chapter 11 Plan
NORMAN EDWARD MCMAHON: Sale of Sewell Property for $175K Approved
OAKS OF PRAIRIE: Has Until Oct. 31 to Use Cash Collateral

OI SA: Creditors Said to Oppose Proposed Restructuring Plan
PALMER FARMS: Wants Authorization to Use GWB Cash Collateral
PEEK, AREN'T YOU: Unsec. Creditors to Have 23% Recovery Under Plan
PENNHILL FARMS: Unsecureds' Projected Recovery Down to 4.6%
PITNEY BOWES: Moody's Cuts Preference Shelf Rating to (P)Ba2

POSITIVEID CORP: Accumulated Losses Raise Going Concern Doubt
POWELL VALLEY: Wants Plan Filing Period Extended to December 14
PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY: Covenant Problems Raise Going Concern Doubt
RELIABLE RACING: Can Use Cash Collateral Until Sept. 19
REVEREND C.T. WALKER: 181 West Offers $9M for New York Property

REVEREND C.T. WALKER: Has $8M Contract to Sell NY Properties
SAMSON RESOURCES: BE Aviation Offers $2.75M for Learjet 45XR
SAMUEL WYLY: SEC Eyes Contempt for Failure to Pay $101-Mil.
SANDERS NURSERY: Exclusive Solicitation Period Extended to Nov. 28
SCORPION PERFORMANCE: Has Until Oct. 26 to File Plan

SEQUENOM INC: Camber Capital Sells Entire Stake to LabCorp
SEQUENOM INC: Common Stock Delisted From NASDAQ
SEQUENOM INC: Consummates Merger With LabCorp
SEQUENOM INC: Eight Directors Resigned
SOFINTEK INC: Court Authorizes Cash Collateral Use

SOUTHERN SEASON: Can Use Cash to Pay for Trailing Expenses
STEVE MURPHY: Unsecureds to be Paid from Cash on Hand
SYDELL INC: Hires J. Michael Levengood as Counsel
TAMARA MELLON: Files $4MM Breach of Contract Suit v. Jimmy Choo
THIRTEEN EAST: Directed to Submit Proposed Order for Cash Use

TOM GJURAJ: Ch. 11 Plan Proposes $15K Payment to Unsecureds
TPP ACQUISITION: Meeting to Form Creditors' Panel Set for Sept. 13
TPP ACQUISITION: Wants $46.8-Mil. DIP Loan From Monroe Capital
TROJE'S TRASH: Sale of Assets to Vermillion for $5.3M Approved
UNITED MOBILE: Can Use Cash Collateral Until Nov. 17

UNIVERSAL NUTRIENTS: Has Interim Approval to Use Cash Collateral
UTSTARCOM HOLDINGS: Smart Soho, et al., Amend Purchase Agreement
VALERITAS HOLDINGS: Liquidity Issues Raise Going Concern Doubt
VANGUARD HEALTHCARE: Regulators Sue Over Quality of Care
VINOD GOPAL PATEL: Sept. 21 Disclosure Statement Hearing

WEST CABINET: Court Allows Cash Collateral Use Through Oct. 31
WEST TEXAS: Auction of $2M Worth of Assets Denied
WILLIAM DEL BIAGGIO: 9th Circ. Affirms Freeman Claim Subordination
WRIGHTWOOD GUEST: Sale of Los Angeles County Property Approved
WRWM PARTNERSHIP: Sale of Pennsylvania Property for $150K Okayed

YVONNE BLANCE ENEA: To Surrender Residence to Secured Creditor
ZIO'S RESTAURANT: Hires Auction Nation as Auctioneer
[*] Long-time Bankruptcy Judge Robert Martin Retiring
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week From Sept. 5 to 9, 2016

                            *********

1601 W. SUNNYSIDE: Selling Scottsdale Condo Unit for $125K
----------------------------------------------------------
1601 West Sunnyside Drive #106, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Idaho a notice disclosing the proposed
private sale of its condominium unit 1709 located at 3500 N. Hayden
Road, Scottsdale, Arizona, to Karen and Alfonso Chiaramonte for
$125,000.

Objection deadline is within 21 days of the date of service of the
notice.

The real property will be sold free and clear of all liens, claims,
and encumbrances, as authorized by 11 U.S.C. Section 363(f)(3).
The Trustee says the sale complies with Section 363(f)(3) because
the real property is being sold for more than the consensual lien
and outstanding real property taxes, which together total
approximately $62,075.  The claims secured by these liens will be
paid from closing.

Wells Fargo Home Mortgage holds a mortgage encumbering the Real
Property in the amount of approximately $61,715.  Real property
taxes for the year 2015 have been paid.  The Debtor estimates that
it will pay about $360 in real property taxes, pro rated through
the closing of sale, for current year property taxes.

Subject to Court approval, the Trustee requests to pay at closing
from the real property sale proceeds, the Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
deed of Trust encumbering the Real Property, pro-rated property
taxes pro-rated as of the date of closing, realtor fees, closings
costs, outstanding property taxes and water assessments, and any
and all other reasonable costs of sale.

The Trustee proposes that the purchase price be distributed in the
following approximate amounts at the time of closing:

   a. Real Property Taxes: $360

   b. Real Estate Commissions at 5%: $6,250

   c. Home Warranty: $500

   d. Escrow Fees: $699

   e. Homeowners Insurance: $820

The Debtor believes the purchase price is approximate to the fair
market value of the property based upon his discussion with his
realtor and current market conditions.  The property has been
exposed to the market since July 21, 2016.  This is the highest and
best offer Debtor received.

The sale will close on Sept. 29, 2016, if approved by the Court.

                  About 1601 West Sunnyside

1601 West Sunnyside Drive #106, LLC, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Idaho Case No.
15-40587) on June 15, 2015.  The Debtor tapped Randal J. French,
Esq., at Randal J. French, P.C., in Boise, Idaho, as counsel.



2013 COLONIAL: Maltz to Auction Bronx Property
----------------------------------------------
2013 Colonial, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York to authorize the auction sale of real property
located at 2013 Colonial Ave., Bronx, New York to be conducted by
Maltz Auctions, doing business as Matz Auction.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Sept. 13, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
Objection deadline is Sept. 12, 2016 at 12:00 p.m.

The property is a building consisting of eleven apartment rental
units.  It constitutes a "single asset real estate".

The Debtor's chapter 11 filing was precipitated by, among other
considerations, the desire to propose, confirm and consummate a
plan of reorganization or liquidation that resolves the claim of
Customers Bank.

The Debtor's building is encumbered by a first mortgage lien by
Customers in an unliquidated amount as of the Petition Date.

Customers Bank subsequently files a proof with the Court in the
total amount of $5,655,360. In its Proof of Claim, Customers Bank
asserted that its claim is secured by a first-priority lien
interest in the Debtor's building in an unknown amount.  Based on a
recent appraisal obtained by Customers Bank, the "as is" fair
market value of the Debtor's building is $2,4000,000 as of May 23,
2016.

To resolve the case and seek to obtain the highest value of the
Debtor's building, the Debtor has entered into a Stipulation with
Customers Bank that, among other things, provides for the
consensual sale of the Debtor's building and a carve-out from the
Customers Bank's lien for the estate and its creditors ("Customers'
Stipulation").  The Customers' Stipulation is being presented to
the Court on Sept. 13, 2016.

By application dated Aug. 30, 2016, the Debtor seeks to employ
Malts, as its auctioneer to market the Debtor's building and
conduct a public auction sale of the building on Nov. 10, 2016, at
10:00 a.m. (PET), at New York LaGuardia Airport Marriott Hotel,
102-05 Ditmars Blvd., East Elmhurst, New York.

The Debtor asks the Court to approve the auction sale of the
Debtor's building in accordance with the Customers' Stipulation and
the Terms and Conditions of Sale.

The pertinent terms of the Customers' Stipulation are as follows:

   a. The Debtor will operate the property in the ordinary course
of business consistent with previous Cash Collateral Budgets and
will seek the entry of a new Cash Collateral Order during the sale
period;

   b. Customers Banks agrees to the following carve-out from the
proceeds of the sale of the property and the Customers' lien: (i)
typical adjustments for real estate taxes, including the
satisfaction of any outstanding tax liens on the property; (ii)
typical charges to the seller in a real estate transaction in the
Bronx for the payment of recording fees, conveyance taxes and
similar charges; (iii) the payment up to $20,000 for
administrative, professional fees to Debtor's counsel McCarthy
Fingar, only after and to the extent the retainer McCarthy Fingar
is currently holding is fully applied to cover its chapter 11
professional fees, and as allowed by the Bankruptcy Court; (iv) the
payment to the Office of the United States Trustee for quarterly
fees due; and (v) reasonable legal fees, not to exceed $3,500, to
counsel for the Debtor related to the real estate closing itself;

   c. Following the closing on the sale of the property, the debtor
is authorized to distribute, without further order of the Court,
the net proceeds of sale of the property to Customers Bank on
account of, in reduction of, and up to the amount of the Customers
Bank's lien and the Debtor is authorized to pay all amounts from
the carve-out, except those that may require a further order of the
Court; and

   d. The Debtor will ask approval to have the bankruptcy case
dismissed followed completion of the sale closing.

The proposed Terms and Conditions of Sale of the Debtor's building
are as follows:

   a. to register to bid, prospective bidders must present a bank
check in the amount of $150,000 made payable to the Debtor;

   b. the successful bidder must close title on Dec 15, 2016, time
being of the essence as to the successful bidder;

   c. the successful bidder must pay all county, state or other
property transfer taxes in connection with the sale of the Debtor's
building; and

   d. the Debtor's building is being sold "a is," where is," "with
all faults," and without any representatives or warranties of any
kind.

A copy of the Customers' Stipulation and the Terms and Conditions
of Sale attached to the Motion is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/2013_Coloniral_49_Sales.pdf

The Debtor has used its sound business judgment to determine that
sale of the Debtor's building at the scheduled auction sale is
appropriate and in the best interests of the Debtor's estate.  The
Debtor has a duty to maximize the value of its assets for the
benefit of the estate and its creditors and the Debtor believes
that it will obtain the highest value for the benefit of its
creditors through the sale of the building at the auction.

                       About 2013 Colonial

2013 Colonial LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-22715) on May 24,
2016.  The petition was signed by Michael Gianatasio, managing
member.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert D. Drain.  The Debtor
estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of $1 million to
$10 million.


5 STAR INVESTMENT: Trustee Selling Mishawaka Property for $42K
--------------------------------------------------------------
Douglas R. Adelsperger, Trustee for 5 Star Investment Group, LLC,
and affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Indiana to authorize the sale of real estate located in
St. Joseph County (Indiana), commonly known as 1306 E. Borley
Avenue, Mishawaka, Indiana ("Real Estate"), to Tammy Properties,
LLC for $42,000.

The Debtor, 5 Star Investment Group, LLC, listed the value of the
Real Estate on its Schedule A at approximately $41,100, which is
based on the 2014/2015 tax assessed value of the Real Estate.

The Real Estate is subject to a tax lien for delinquent real estate
taxes for the 2014 Fall installment that was due and payable in
2015, in the approximate sum of $611 ("2014 Fall Tax Lien").  The
Real Estate is also subject to a tax lien for real estate taxes for
2015 that are due and payable in 2016, in the approximate sum of
$1,278 ("2015 Tax Lien").

The Real Estate is also subject to the following mortgages
("Investor Mortgages"):

   a. A first priority mortgage in favor of Christ Eicher dated
Oct. 30, 2012 ("Eicher Mortgage").  The Eicher Mortgage was
recorded on Feb. 12, 2013 in the Office of the Recorder of St.
Joseph County, Indiana, as Instrument No. 1304260;

   b. A second priority mortgage in favor of Shannon Long dated
Feb. 21, 2014 ("Long Mortgage").  The Long Mortgage was recorded on
March 28, 2014 in the Office of the Recorder of St. Joseph County,
Indiana, as Instrument No. 1406901; and

   c. A third priority mortgage in favor of Midland IRA, Inc., FBO
Nancy Lynn Cook #1635401 dated July 25, 2014 ("Cook Mortgage"). The
Cook Mortgage was recorded on Aug. 27, 2014 in the Office of the
Recorder of St. Joseph County, Indiana, as Instrument No. 1421128.

Upon information and belief, the outstanding balances owed pursuant
to the Investor Mortgages are:

   a. The Eicher Mortgage is approximately $25,000;

   b. The Long Mortgage is approximately $30,000; and

   c. The Cook Mortgage is approximately $29,233.

On July 21, 2016, the Court entered its order granting the
application to employ Tiffany Group Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as
the bankruptcy estates' broker, authorizing the employment of
Tiffany Group to assist the Trustee with the marketing and sale of
real estate, including the Real Estate at issue in the Motion.
Pursuant to the Listing Agreement approved by the Court, Tiffany
Group is entitled to receive a commission of 5% of the total
purchase price for all sales that were obtained solely through the
efforts of the Tiffany Group.

On Sept. 2, 2016, pursuant to the sole efforts of the Tiffany
Group, the Trustee entered into a purchase agreement for the sale
of the Real Estate to Tammy Properties for the total sale price of
$42,000 ("Purchase Agreement").

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/5_Star_465_Sales.pdf

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Purchaser is purchasing the
Real Estate "as is and where is and will all faults". Pursuant to
the Listing Agreement with Tiffany Group, Tiffany Group is entitled
to receive a commission of 5% of the total sale price for the Real
Estate, or $2,100, to be paid at closing.

The Trustee will disburse the proceeds from the sale of the Real
Estate, first to pay the costs and expenses of the sale, including
the commission owed to Tiffany Group in the approximate sum of
$2,100, and second to pay all real estate taxes and assessments
outstanding and unpaid at the time of the sale, including the Tax
Liens. The Trustee will retain the excess proceeds from the sale of
the Real Estate until further Order of the Court.

The Trustee has attempted to fully investigate the marketability
and value of the Real Estate, and in his business judgment,
believes that the proposed private sale of the Real Estate to the
Purchaser represents the best way to obtain the highest and best
offer attainable for the sale of the Real Estate. The Trustee
represents that the proposed sale is fair and equitable and in the
best interests of the Consolidated Bankruptcy Estate, and
represents the best way to obtain a reasonable recovery for the
Consolidated Bankruptcy Estate.  Against this background, the
Trustee asserts that sound business reasons justify the Trustee's
decision to sell the Real Estate to the Purchaser for the total
sale price of $42,000 and, therefore, requests that the Court
approve the sale, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, that it enter
an Order granting the Motion, and waive the requirements of
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

The Purchaser can be reached at:

          TAMMY PROPERTIES, LLC
          826h Stafford Lawn
          Indianapolis, IN 46260
          Telephone: (317) 259-4122
          Facsimile: (317) 259-4123

                  About 5 Star Investment Group

5 Star Investment Group, LLC, and its 10 affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Ind. Lead Case No. 16-30078) on Jan. 25, 2016.  5 Star estimated
its assets at up to $50,000 and its liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million.   The Debtor's counsel is Katherine C. O'Malley,
Esq., at Cozen O'Connor, in Chicago, Illinois.

The cases are assigned to Judge Harry C. Dees, Jr.

On Feb. 29, 2016, Douglas R. Adelsperger was appointed as Chapter
11 trustee in each of the bankruptcy cases.

On March 23, 2016, the Court entered an order consolidating the
bankruptcy cases for purposes of administration only.



5 STAR INVESTMENT: Trustee Selling Mishawaka Property for $88K
--------------------------------------------------------------
Douglas R. Adelsperger, Trustee for 5 Star Investment Group, LLC
and affiliates, ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Indiana to authorize the sale of real estate located in
St. Joseph County, Indiana, commonly known as 318 N. Wenger Street,
Mishawaka, Indiana, to Kimberly Bonds for $88,100.

The property is more particularly described as:

      Lot Numbered 109 in Wenger Realty Co.'s Addition to the City
of Mishawaka, in St. Joseph County, Indiana, as per plat thereof
recorded Sept. 13, 1904 in Plat Book 8, page 182 in the Office of
the Recorder of Saint Joseph County, Indiana ("Real Estate").

The Debtor, 5 Star Investment Group V, LLC, listed the value of the
Real Estate on its Schedule A at approximately $54,900, which is
based on the 2014/2015 tax assessed value of the Real Estate.

The Real Estate is also subject to these mortgages ("Investor
Mortgages"):

   (a) A first priority mortgage in favor of James Shetler dated
June 30, 2011 ("Shetler Mortgage").  The Shetler Mortgage was
recorded on Aug. 11, 2011 in the Office of the Recorder of St.
Joseph County, Indiana, as Instrument No. 1120445; and

   (b) A second priority mortgage in favor of Victor Graber dated
Dec. 31, 2013 ("Graber Mortgage"). The Graber Mortgage was recorded
on Jan. 13, 2014 in the Office of the Recorder of St. Joseph
County, Indiana, as Instrument No. 1400960.

Upon information and belief, the outstanding balances owed pursuant
to the Investor Mortgages are:

   (a) The Shetler Mortgage is approximately $35,418; and

   (b) The Graber Mortgage is approximately $54,583.

Accordingly, the total outstanding balance of the Investor
Mortgages is approximately $90,001.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Real Estate was subject to a lease
("Lease"), with an option to purchase, in favor of Tenant. Pursuant
to the option to purchase under the Lease, the Tenant deposited
with the Debtor, 5 Star Investment Group V, LLC, a non-refundable
lease purchase payment of $3,450 ("Deposit").  In the event the
Tenant exercised her rights pursuant to the option to purchase
under the Lease, the Deposit was to be applied to the full purchase
price, as stated in the Lease. The Trustee and the Tenant have
agreed that the Lease, including the option to purchase, has
expired and that the Tenant did not exercise her rights pursuant to
the option to purchase.  Accordingly, the Tenant has no interest in
the Real Estate, other than her rights as a month-to-month tenant
pursuant to Ind. Code Section 32-31-1-2.

On Aug. 31, 2016, pursuant to the sole efforts of the Trustee, the
Trustee entered into a purchase agreement ("Purchase Agreement")
for the sale of the Real Estate to the Tenant for the total sale
price of $88,100.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/5_Star_462_Sales.pdf

On July 21, 2016, the Court entered its Order Granting Trustee's
Application to Employ Tiffany Group Real Estate Advisors, LLC as
the Bankruptcy Estates' Broker, authorizing the employment of
Tiffany Group Real Estate Advisors, LLC, to assist the Trustee with
the marketing and sale of the real estate. Pursuant to the Listing
Agreement approved by the Court, Tiffany Group is not entitled to
any commissions for sales of real estate to tenants occupying
properties that were obtained solely through the efforts of the
Trustee, his counsel, the Committee and/or the Committee's counsel.
Accordingly, the Tiffany Group is not entitled to a commission on
the sale of the Real Estate to the Tenant.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Tenant is purchasing the
Real Estate "as is and where is and with all faults". Additionally,
pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Tenant is entitled to a
credit of $3,450 against the total purchase price for the Deposit
the Tenant previously paid pursuant to the Lease.

The Trustee will disburse the proceeds from the sale of the Real
Estate, first to pay the costs and expenses of the sale, and second
to pay all real estate taxes and assessments outstanding and unpaid
at the time of the sale, including the Tax Liens. The Trustee will
retain the excess proceeds from the sale of the Real Estate until
further Order of the Court.

The Trustee has attempted to fully investigate the marketability
and value of the Real Estate, and in his business judgment,
believes that the proposed private sale of the Real Estate to the
Tenant represents the best way to obtain the highest and best offer
attainable for the sale of the Real Estate. The Trustee represents
that the proposed sale is fair and equitable and in the best
interests of the Consolidated Bankruptcy Estate, and represents the
best way to obtain a reasonable recovery for the Consolidated
Bankruptcy Estate. Against this background, the Trustee asserts
that sound business reasons justify the Trustee's decision to sell
the Real Estate to the Tenant for the total sale price of $88,100
and, therefore, requests that the Court approve the sale, pursuant
to the Purchase Agreement, that it enter an Order granting the
Motion, and waive the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

The Purchaser can be reached at:

          Kimberly Bonds
          318 N, Wenger Street
          Mishawaka, IN 46544
          Telephone: (574) 855-9746
          E-mail: Luv JTK2U@aol.com

                  About 5 Star Investment Group

5 Star Investment Group, LLC, and its 10 affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Ind. Lead Case No. 16-30078) on Jan. 25, 2016.  5 Star estimated
its assets at up to $50,000 and its liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million.   The Debtor's counsel is Katherine C. O'Malley,
Esq., at Cozen O'Connor, in Chicago, Illinois.

The cases are assigned to Judge Harry C. Dees, Jr.

On Feb. 29, 2016, Douglas R. Adelsperger was appointed as Chapter
11 trustee in each of the bankruptcy cases.  

On March 23, 2016, the Court entered an order consolidating the
bankruptcy cases for purposes of administration only.



ABENGOA BIOENERGY: Claims Bar Date Set for September 28
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri set
Sept. 28, 2016, at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time) as deadline
for each person or entity to file proofs of claim against Abengoa
Bioenergy US Holding LLC and its debtor-affiliates.  The Court also
set Dec. 12, 2016, at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time) as last
day for governmental units to file their claims against the
Debtors.

In addition, the Court established Oct. 17, 2016, at 5:00 pm.
(prevailing Central Time) as deadline for all persons or entities
holding any right to payment constituting an actual, necessary cost
or expense of administering the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases or
preserving the estates under Section 503(b) and 507(a)(2) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

For more information, contact (i) the Debtors' counsel, DLA Piper
LLP (US) at (302) 468-5700; the Court appointed claims agent, Prime
Clerk LLC at (855) 650-724; or visit the case website maintained by
Prime Clerk at https://cases.primeclerk.com/abengoa.

             About Abengoa Bioenergy US Holding, LLC.

Abengoa Bioenergy is a collection of indirect subsidiaries of
Abengoa S.A., a Spanish company founded in 1941. The global
headquarters of Abengoa Bioenergy is in Chesterfield, Missouri.
With a total investment of $3.3 billion, the United States has
become Abengoa S.A.'s largest market in terms of sales volume,
particularly from developing solar, bioethanol, and water
projects.

Spanish energy giant Abengoa S.A. is an engineering and clean
technology company with operations in more than 50 countries
worldwide that provides innovative solutions for a diverse range of
customers in the energy and environmental sectors.  Abengoa is one
of the world's top builders of power lines transporting energy
across Latin America and a top engineering and construction
business, making massive renewable-energy power plants worldwide.

On Nov. 25, 2015, in Spain, Abengoa S.A. announced its intention to
seek protection under Article 5bis of Spanish insolvency law, a
pre-insolvency statute that permits a company to enter into
negotiations with certain creditors for restricting of its
financial affairs.  The Spanish company is facing a March 28, 2016,
deadline to agree on a viability plan or restructuring plan with
its banks and bondholders, without which it could be forced to
declare bankruptcy.

Gavilon Grain, LLC, et al., on Feb. 1, 2016, filed an involuntary
Chapter 7 petition for Abengoa Bioenergy of Nebraska, LLC ("ABNE")
and on Feb. 11, 2016, filed an involuntary Chapter 7 petition for
Abengoa Bioenergy Company, LLC ("ABC").  ABC's involuntary Chapter
7 case is Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 16-20178. ABNE's involuntary case
is Bankr. D. Neb. Case No. 16-80141. An order for relief has not
been entered, and no interim Chapter 7 trustee has been appointed
in the Involuntary Cases. The petitioning creditors are represented
by McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C.

On Feb. 24, 2016, Abengoa Bioenergy US Holding, LLC and five
affiliated debtors each filed a Chapter 11 voluntary petition in
St. Louis, Missouri, disclosing total assets of $1.3 billion and
debt of $1.2 billion.  The cases are pending before the Honorable
Kathy A. Surratt-States and are jointly administered under Bankr.
E.D. Mo. Case No. 16-41161.

The Debtors have engaged DLA Piper LLP (US) as counsel, Armstrong
Teasdale LLP as co-counsel, Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as
financial advisor, Lazard as investment banker and Prime Clerk LLC
as claims and noticing agent.


ABENGOA BIOENERGY: Creditors' Panel Taps MelCap as Advisor
----------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Abengoa Bioenergy
Biomass of Kansas, LLC asks for authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Texas to retain MelCap
Partners, LLC as financial advisor and investment banker, effective
August 19, 2016.

The Committee requires MelCap to:

   (a) review and evaluate the marketing and sale process
       undertaken by the Debtor and its financial advisor, both
       pre- and post-bankruptcy;

   (b) review and evaluate the Debtor's proposed auction process
       and bidding procedures;

   (c) review and evaluate the process for selecting any
       "stalkinghorse bidder" and the terms and conditions of any  
  
       "stalking-horse" offer;

   (d) review and evaluate offers for the Debtor's assets received

       from any qualified bidder; and

   (e) perform all other appropriate services that the Committee
       may request and MelCap may agree to provide in this case.

MelCap will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Albert D. Melchiorre, president      $550
       Marc A. Fleagle, vice president      $350
       Matthew J. Roberts, associate        $250
       Matthew M. Sweet, analyst            $150
       Evans J. Lyons, analyst              $150

MelCap will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Albert D. Melchiorre, president and founder of MelCap, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

MelCap can be reached at:

       Albert D. Melchiorre
       MELCAP PARTNERS, LLC
       1684 Medina Road, Ste 102
       Medina, OH 44256
       Tel: (330) 239-1990
       Fax: (330) 239-1991

            About Abengoa Bioenergy US Holding, LLC.

Abengoa Bioenergy is a collection of indirect subsidiaries of
Abengoa S.A., a Spanish company founded in 1941. The global
headquarters of Abengoa Bioenergy is in Chesterfield, Missouri.
With a total investment of $3.3 billion, the United States has
become Abengoa S.A.'s largest market in terms of sales volume,
particularly from developing solar, bioethanol, and water
projects.

Spanish energy giant Abengoa S.A. is an engineering and clean
technology company with operations in more than 50 countries
worldwide that provides innovative solutions for a diverse range
of customers in the energy and environmental sectors.  Abengoa is
one of the world's top builders of power lines transporting energy
across Latin America and a top engineering and construction
business, making massive renewable-energy power plants worldwide.

On Nov. 25, 2015, in Spain, Abengoa S.A. announced its intention
to seek protection under Article 5bis of Spanish insolvency law, a
pre-insolvency statute that permits a company to enter into
negotiations with certain creditors for restricting of its
financial affairs.  The Spanish company is facing a March 28,
2016, deadline to agree on a viability plan or restructuring plan
with its banks and bondholders, without which it could be forced to
declare bankruptcy.

Gavilon Grain, LLC, et al., on Feb. 1, 2016, filed an involuntary
Chapter 7 petition for Abengoa Bioenergy of Nebraska, LLC ("ABNE")
and on Feb. 11, 2016, filed an involuntary Chapter 7 petition for
Abengoa Bioenergy Company, LLC ("ABC").  ABC's involuntary Chapter
7 case is Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 16-20178. ABNE's involuntary
case is Bankr. D. Neb. Case No. 16-80141. An order for relief has
not been entered, and no interim Chapter 7 trustee has been
appointed in the Involuntary Cases. The petitioning creditors are
represented by McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C.

On Feb. 24, 2016, Abengoa Bioenergy US Holding, LLC and five
affiliated debtors each filed a Chapter 11 voluntary petition in
St. Louis, Missouri, disclosing total assets of $1.3 billion and
debt of $1.2 billion.  The cases are pending before the Honorable
Kathy A. Surratt-States and are jointly administered under Bankr.
E.D. Mo. Case No. 16-41161.

The Debtors have engaged DLA Piper LLP (US) as counsel, Armstrong
Teasdale LLP as co-counsel, Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as
financial advisor, Lazard as investment banker and Prime Clerk LLC
as claims and noticing agent.


ADA GIRON: Sale of 2851 Property to Masons for $75K Approved
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Donald R. Cassling of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois authorized Ada A. Giron to sell real
property located at 2851 W. Cermak, Chicago, Illinois ("2851
Property") to James Mason and Margaret Mason for $75,000.

The sale is free and clear of any liens, claims, interests,
assessments and encumbrances.

Judge Cassling authorized and directed the Debtor to sell the 2851
Property, including the land as more particularly described in the
Contract, the improvements thereon, and all personal property
specified in the Contract to Masons.

The sale of the 2851 Property to Masons is authorized to occur on
substantially the same terms and conditions set forth in the
Contract accepted on Aug. 9, 2016 between the Debtor and the
Masons.

The Masons will pay Debtor the purchase price upon the closing of
the transactions under the Contract, subject to adjustments and
pro-rations as set forth in the Contract, as follows:

    (i) The Masons have paid an initial earnest money deposit in
the amount of $1,000, which amount will be contributed toward the
Masons' obligation to pay the purchase price under the Contract.

   (ii) The balance of the purchase price, subject to pro-rations
and adjustments as set forth in the Contract, will be paid at
closing and distributed (or caused to be distributed) as set forth
in the Order.

The Debtor is authorized to and will pay and/or satisfy at closing
(and will cause any title company or other closing agent handling
the closing of the transactions under the Sale Contract to pay),
from the purchase price, in order of priority, (i) reasonable
closing costs; (ii) any and all taxes and outstanding sewer and
other utility liens running with the 2851 Property as provided
under the Contract; (iii) the balance of the mortgage lien to
Waterfall Olympic Master Fund (serviced through KeyBank) at closing
to Waterfall Olympic Fund.

Any proceeds from the sale will be tendered to Waterfall Olympic
Master Fund (serviced through KeyBank) at closing and that
Waterfall Olympic Master Fund be granted a general unsecured claim
as to any deficiency balance remaining.

Ada A. Giron sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case
No. 15-07521) on March 3, 2015.  The Debtor tapped Paul M. Bach,
Esq., and Penelope N. Bach, Esq., at Sulaiman Law Group, LTD., as
counsel.


ADA GIRON: Sale of 2853 Property to Masons for $100K Approved
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Donald R. Cassling of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois authorized Ada A. Giron to sell real
property located at 2853 W. Cermak, Chicago, Illinois, to James
Mason and Margaret Mason for $100,000.

The sale is free and clear of any liens, claims, interests,
assessments and encumbrances.

Judge Cassling authorized and directed the Debtor to sell the 2853
Property, including the land as more particularly described in the
Contract, the improvements thereon, and all personal property
specified in the Contract to the Masons.

The sale of the 2853 Property to the Masons is authorized to occur
on substantially the same terms and conditions set forth in the
Contract accepted on Aug. 9, 2016 between the Debtor and the
Masons.

The Masons will pay the Debtor the purchase price upon the closing
of the transactions under the Contract, subject to adjustments and
pro-rations as set forth in the Contract, as follows:

   (i) The Masons has paid an initial earnest money deposit in the
amount of $1,000, which amount shall be contributed toward the
Masons' obligation to pay the purchase price under the Contract.

  (ii) The balance of the purchase price, subject to pro-rations
and adjustments as set forth in the Contract, will be paid at
closing and distributed (or caused to be distributed) as set forth
in the Order.

The Debtor is authorized to and will pay and/or satisfy at closing
(and will cause any title company or other closing agent handling
the closing of the transactions under the Sale Contract to pay),
from the purchase price, in order of priority, (i) reasonable
closing costs; (ii) any and all taxes and outstanding sewer and
other utility liens running with the 2853 Property as provided
under the Contract; and (iii) the balance of the mortgage lien to
Byline Bank at closing to Byline Bank.

Any proceeds from the sale will be tendered to Byline Bank at
closing and that Byline Bank be granted a general unsecured claim
as to any deficiency balance remaining.

Ada A. Giron sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case
No. 15-07521) on March 3, 2015.  The Debtor tapped Paul M. Bach,
Esq., and Penelope N. Bach, Esq., at Sulaiman Law Group, LTD., as
counsel.


ADVANCED MICRO: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' CCR,Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' corporate credit rating on
Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Advanced Micro Devices Inc.  The outlook is
stable.  In addition, S&P assigned its 'CCC' issue-level rating to
the company's senior unsecured convertible notes due in 2026.

S&P also affirmed its 'CCC' senior unsecured issue level rating.
The senior unsecured recovery rating remains '5', indicating S&P's
expectation of modest recovery (in the lower half of the 10%-30%
range) in the event of a payment default.

The ratings reflect AMD's vulnerable business risk profile: weak PC
industry conditions, intense competition from Intel, and challenges
to grow in targeted enterprise, and embedded and semi-custom
product markets to offset PC business declines.  It also reflects
S&P's expectation that AMD will experience a gradual return to
revenue growth, supported by new product introductions in 2016 and
2017.  "Considering mid-year 2016 new product introductions and its
solid revenue share within the gaming-console semiconductor
products market, we expect AMD's revenues and EBITDA will
strengthen over our 2017 forecast horizon, with a return to
low-single-digit revenue growth and EBITDA margins," said S&P
Global Ratings credit analyst John D. Moore.

S&P Global Ratings also expects free cash flow will remain weak at
about break-even to negative $50 million annually in 2016 and 2017,
including payments related to AMD's recently amended five-year
wafer-supply agreement with Globalfoundries Inc. (GF).  AMD agreed
to pay GF $100 million in four quarterly installments beginning in
the December 2016 quarter.  Once completed, the current
recapitalization transaction should reduce interest expense by
about $60 million annually, partially offsetting the GF installment
payment cash outflows in 2017.  AMD expects to generate free cash
flow for the year ending Dec. 31, 2016.

The stable rating outlook reflects AMD's moderating weakness and
improving prospects to stabilize its operating performance.  It
also considers AMD's vulnerable business profile.  Ongoing
competitive pressures could reverse its recent improvement in the
weak PC microprocessor market as well as new product markets.

Although unlikely over 2016 and 2017, S&P could lower the rating if
AMD's liquidity weakens such that its cash balances decline to less
than $600 million, or if its business declines persist further,
impairing its liquidity position.

S&P could raise the rating if AMD achieves sustained revenue and
margin growth and preserves its liquidity.


AIR CANADA: S&P Raises CCR to 'BB-'; Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it raised its corporate credit rating on
Air Canada to 'BB-' from 'B+'.  The outlook is stable.

In addition, S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB+' issue-level
rating (two notches above the corporate credit rating) and '1'
recovery rating (90%-100%) to Air Canada's proposed US$300 million
revolving credit facility due 2021 and US$720 million term loan due
2023.  S&P expects the issue and recovery ratings to be unchanged
if the deal is upsized by another C$300 million.  The company will
use proceeds from the refinancing to redeem some of its secured
debt (term loan, first-lien, and second-lien notes).

Finally, S&P Global Ratings raised its issue-level rating on the
company's US$400 million unsecured notes to 'BB-' (the same as
corporate rating) from 'B' and revised its recovery rating on the
notes to '3' (50%-70%, higher end of range) from '5'.

Furthermore, S&P has raised its ratings on these enhanced equipment
trust certificates (EETCs):

   -- The 2015-2 class A EETCs one notch to 'A+' from 'A';
   -- The 2015-1 class B EETCs to 'BBB+' from 'BBB';
   -- The 2013-1 series B and 2015-2 series B EETCs to 'BBB' from
      'BBB-'; and
   -- The 2013-1 series C and 2015-1 series C to 'BB' from 'BB-'.

Finally, the ratings on 2013-1 series A and 2015-1 series A are
unchanged at 'A', and the rating on 2015-2 series AA is unchanged
at 'AA', as they are constrained by their respective liquidity
provider ratings.

"The upgrade on Air Canada reflects our revision of the company's
business risk profile to fair from weak," said S&P Global Ratings
credit analyst Aniki Saha-Yannopoulos.  "The company continues to
maintain its above-average profitability in 2016, in line with 2015
levels, in spite of some weakness in the western Alberta markets
and pricing pressures in certain international markets," Ms. Saha
Yannopoulos said.

Air Canada has been successful in maintaining its adjusted EBITDA
margins above 18% due to the company's fleet flexibility,
geographic diversity, and management's focus on cost control.  As a
result, S&P expects the company to generate adjusted EBITDA in
excess of the C$2.5 billion generated in 2015.  In addition, S&P
expects Air Canada to maintain its aggressive financial risk
profile, while the company continues with its large capital
expenditure program.

Air Canada is Canada's largest domestic and international
full-service airline.  The company is also the 15th-largest
commercial airline in the world, serving more than 41 million
customers annually.  As of June 30, 2016, Air Canada operated a
mainline fleet of 169 aircraft and Air Canada Rouge, the company's
wholly owned leisure carrier, owns 44 aircraft.  In addition, it
has capacity purchase agreements with regional airlines that
operate under Air Canada Express.

S&P's fair business risk profile assessment reflects the company
operating in the North American airline sector, which S&P considers
high risk due to cyclical demand, significant competition, high
operating leverage, and capital intensity. Furthermore, the
passenger airline industry is susceptible to outside events such as
war, terrorism, and epidemics.  Air Canada's operating cost
structure compares favorably with that of other legacy North
American airline carriers; the company has reduced its margin of
difference through cost-cutting measures.

Air Canada's financial risk profile remains aggressive; to
calculate debt leverage measures, we net all cash on hand in excess
of C$1 billion given the company's minimum liquidity requirements
per covenants.  Even though the company's funds from operations
(FFO) to net debt measure has improved, S&P expects Air Canada's
financial risk profile to be constrained by the company's free cash
flow deficit, which primarily reflects high capital expenditures
for new aircraft deliveries.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that Air Canada will sustain
healthy profitability, in spite of some pressure in the domestic
market, as the company continues to focus on its profitable
international traffic, operational discipline and cost reduction,
and fleet flexibility.  S&P's outlook also takes into account its
expectation that its credit ratio (FFO to debt) will remain between
25%-30%, in line with the intermediate financial risk profile.

Although unlikely in the next 12 months, S&P could raise the
ratings if increasing cash flow results in Air Canada sustaining
adjusted FFO to debt of more than 30% and free operating cash flow
to debt exceeding 10%, and S&P believes the ratios will be
maintained at those levels.

S&P could lower the ratings if the company's profitability metrics
show deterioration from current levels, either due to
higher-than-expected costs the airline incurs or negative impact of
industry headwinds on Air Canada's operating results.  S&P could
also consider a negative rating action if it perceives the
company's credit metrics weakening and FFO to debt deteriorates
below 20% on a sustained basis.


ALGODON WINES: Accumulated Deficit Raises Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------------
Algodon Wines & Luxury Development Group, Inc., filed its quarterly
report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $3.29 million on
$339,056 of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016,
compared with a net loss of $3.82 million on $269,275 of sales for
the same period in the prior year.

The Company's balance sheet at June 30, 2016, showed $7.73 million
in total assets, $3.98 million in total liabilities, and a
stockholders' equity of $3.75 million.

As reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated financial
statements, the Company has generated significant losses which have
resulted in a total accumulated deficit of approximately $63
million, raising substantial doubt that it will be able to continue
operations as a going concern.  The Company's independent
registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph
in their report for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014,
stating that the Company has incurred significant losses and need
to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations.  The Company's ability to execute its business plan is
dependent upon its generating cash flow and obtaining additional
debt or equity capital sufficient to fund operations.  If the
Company is able to obtain additional debt or equity capital (of
which there can be no assurance), the Company hopes to acquire
additional management, as well as increase the marketing of the
Company's products and continue the development of its real estate
holdings.

The Company's business strategy may not be successful in addressing
these issues and there can be no assurance that they will be able
to obtain any additional capital.  If they cannot execute their
business plan on a timely basis (including acquiring additional
capital), the Company's stockholders may lose their entire
investment in them, because they may have to delay vendor payments
and/or initiate cost reductions, which would have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations, and ultimately the Company could be forced
to discontinue its operations, liquidate and/or seek reorganization
under the U.S. bankruptcy code.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:
                              
                       https://is.gd/UQ3chX

New York-based Algodon Wines & Luxury Development Group, Inc.,
operates Algodon Mansion, a Buenos Aires-based luxury boutique
hotel property.  This lifestyle related real estate development
company has also redeveloped, expanded and repositioned a winery
and golf resort property called Algodon Wine Estates for
subdivision of a portion of this property for residential
development.



ALLISON TRANSMISSION: Moody's Gives Ba3 Sr Unsecured Notes Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba3 rating to Allison
Transmission, Inc.'s (Allison) proposed $750 million offering of
senior unsecured notes and a Ba1 rating to the amended and extended
$1.4 billion secured term loan due 2022, as well as a $400 million
secured revolving credit facility due 2021. Proceeds from the $750
million unsecured note offering, the new term loan, and cash on
hand will be used to repay the company's existing $2.4 billion term
loan. The Ba2 rating on the existing term loan and revolver will be
withdrawn upon closing of the transactions. Allison's Corporate
Family Rating (CFR) and Speculative Grade Liquidity rating are
unchanged at Ba2 and SGL-1 respectively. The rating outlook is
stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The assignment of a Ba1 rating to the new secured debt (compared
with the Ba2 rating of the existing credit facilities) reflects the
improved recovery prospects that secured creditors would enjoy as a
result of the significant increase in unsecured debt ($750
million), and the related decrease in secured debt (from $2.2
billion to $1.4 billion.

Allison's Ba2 CFR reflects Moody's expectation that the company
will maintain its position as the global leader in designing and
manufacturing automatic transmissions used in class 6 and 7 trucks,
buses and motor homes. This position enables the company to
maintain a healthy operating profile despite the current slowdown
in the North American medium-duty truck market. For the last twelve
months through June 2016 EBITA margins approached 30%, free cash
flow approximated $450 million and EBITA/interest stood at 5.8
times. Moody's said, “Allison's robust operating position is
balanced against financial policies that we expect will distribute
capital to shareholders (dividends and share repurchases) so that
the company remains within its net debt/EBITDA target of 3.0 to 3.5
times. This equates with a Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA of
approximately 3.5 to 4.0 times.”

The stable outlook reflects Allison's ability to maintain its
strong competitive position, and its high returns and cash
generation despite the cyclical downturn affecting its core North
American market.

“While we expect the company to continue to maintain solid credit
metrics for its rating category and a very competitive position in
its end markets, an upgrade during the intermediate term is
unlikely. Given the company's current financial policies which
result in a target ratio of debt to EBITDA of 3.5 to 4.0x (after
Moody's standard adjustments and assuming the current cash level is
maintained), an upgrade would not result solely from performance
and credit metric improvements. Rather, the current balance between
business risk and financial policies limit further upward momentum.
However, if additional balance sheet strengthening develops over
time and is sustainable, the ratings could be upgraded. Metrics
that might contribute to a higher rating include debt/EBITDA below
3.0x while maintaining its currently strong level of EBITA margins
and solid free cash flow generation.” Moody's said.

Factors which could result in a lower rating include debt / EBITDA
above 4.0x and EBITA / interest below 3.5x. Other potential factors
include more aggressive returns of capital to shareholders, higher
target leverage levels, a significant drop in EBITA margins or a
meaningful decline in free cash flow including as a result of
adverse changes in working capital management.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global
Automotive Supplier Industry published in June 2016.




ART AND ARCHITECTURE: Court Allows Jones Day $59K Admin Claim
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned In re: ART AND ARCHITECTURE BOOKS OF THE 21st
CENTURY, dba ACE GALLERY, Chapter 11, Debtor, Case No.
2:13-bk-14135-RK (Bankr. C.D. Calif.), Judge Robert Kwan of the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California, Los Angeles Division, determined that Jones Day is
entitled to allowance of its administrative expense claim in the
amount of $59,628.50 for fees and expenses pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
Section 503(b)(1)(A), which will be paid in accordance with the
terms of the confirmed plan of reorganization, and Jones Day is
ordered to submit a proposed order for allowance and payment of
this claim within 14 days of the date of entry of this Memorandum
Decision pursuant to Rule 9014 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure and Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Jones Day, Former Counsel for David R. Haberbush, Solely in His
Capacity as Court-Appointed Responsible Officer for Ace Museum,
filed a motion for allowance and payment of administrative
expenses, which seeks allowance of the firm's claim for payment of
its services for Mr. Haberbush as administrative expenses of
$78,344.17.  The court notes that the billing entries in support of
the Motion only show claimed fees and expenses of $78,138.50. The
Motion was opposed by Plan Agent Sam S. Leslie and Jones Day filed
a reply thereto.

Judge Kwan finds that there were some services rendered by Jones
Day to Haberbush that were actual and necessary costs of the
administration of the bankruptcy estate, including Jones Day's
interpretation of the Appointment Order and the resolution of the
issue related to the form of the Appointment Order.

Judge Kwan, however, disallowed the portion of Jones Day's claims
for fees and expenses of  $18,510 relating to insurance and real
estate matters, which the court finds to be unreasonable and
unnecessary costs of administration.

A full-text copy of the Memorandum Decision dated August 24, 2016
is available at https://is.gd/jyjdJG from Leagle.com.

Art and Architecture Books of the 21st Century, Debtor, is
represented by Jerome S. Cohen, Esq. -- jsc@cohenbordeaux.com --
Cohen & Bordeaux, LLP, Carolyn A. Dye, Thomas M. Geher, Esq. --
TGeher@jmbm.com -- Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP, David W.
Meadows, Esq. -- david@davidwmeadowslaw.com -- Law Offices of
David
W. Meadows.

United States Trustee (LA), U.S. Trustee, represented by Alvin
Mar.

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, Creditor Committee, is
represented by Asa S. Hami, Esq. -- ahami@sulmeyerlaw.com --
Sulmeyer Kupetz, A Prof Corp, Daniel A. Lev, Esq. --
dlev@pierceatwood.com -- Pierce Atwood LLP, David J. Richardson,
Esq. -- drichardson@sulmeyerlaw.com -- Sulmeyer Kupetz, Victor A.
Sahn, Esq. -- vsahn@sulmeyerlaw.com -- Sulmeyer Kupetz, Esq. --
swerth@sulmeyerlaw.com -- Sulmeyer Kupetz.

Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors, Creditor Committee, is
represented by David S. Kupetz, Esq. -- dkupetz@sulmeyerlaw.com --
Sulmeyer Kupetz, Jessica Vogel, Esq. -- jvogel@sulmeyerlaw.com --
Sulmeyer Kupetz.

Art and Architecture Books of the 21st Century, dba Ace Gallery,
filed for a voluntary Chapter 11 petition on Feb. 19, 2013, in the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Case
No. 13-14135.  The petition was signed by Douglas Chrismas,
president.  Judge Robert Kwan presides over the case.  Joseph A.
Eisenberg, Esq., at Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP, serves
as counsel.  The Debtor reported $1 million to $10 million in
assets and $10 million to $50 million in debts.


ASPEN GROUP: Inks $3 Million Credit Agreement With Leon Cooperman
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aspen Group, Inc., entered into a $3 million revolving line of
credit agreement with Leon Cooperman on Aug. 31, 2016.  Under the
LOC, Mr. Cooperman agreed to lend the Company up to a maximum of $3
million on a revolving basis for up to three years.  The Company
paid Mr. Cooperman a facility fee of $60,000 and issued Mr.
Cooperman a Revolving Promissory Note.  In addition, the Company
will pay to Mr. Cooperman interest monthly on the principal amount
of the Note outstanding at a rate of 12% per annum, and a
commitment fee monthly on the undrawn portion of the Note at a rate
of 2% per annum.  The Company borrowed $750,000 under the LOC and
used $248,783 to repay its prior $250,000 revolving credit line
with a commercial bank.

In connection with the Agreement, the Company issued to Mr.
Cooperman 750,000 five-year warrants.  The Warrants are exercisable
at $0.20 per share.

Meanwhile, Mr. Michael Mathews, the chairman of the Board and chief
executive officer of Aspen Group, presented at the 5th Annual
Gateway Conference in San Francisco.  A copy of the presentation
used at the conference is available at:

                     https://is.gd/QjGmkX

                       About Aspen Group

Denver, Colo.-based Aspen Group, Inc., was founded in Colorado in
1987 as the International School of Information Management.  On
Sept. 30, 2004, it was acquired by Higher Education Management
Group, Inc., and changed its name to Aspen University Inc.  On
May 13, 2011, the Company formed in Colorado a subsidiary, Aspen
University Marketing, LLC, which is currently inactive.  On
March 13, 2012, the Company was recapitalized in a reverse merger.

Aspen's mission is to become an institution of choice for adult
learners by offering cost-effective, comprehensive, and relevant
online education.  Approximately 88 percent of the Company's
degree-seeking students (as of June 30, 2012) were enrolled in
graduate degree programs (Master or Doctorate degree program).
Since 1993, the Company has been nationally accredited by the
Distance Education and Training Council, a national accrediting
agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.

Aspen Group reported a net loss of $2.24 million on $8.45 million
of revenues for the year ended April 30, 2016, compared to a net
loss of $4.26 million on $5.22 million of revenues for the year
ended April 30, 2015.

As of April 30, 2016, Aspen had $4.50 million in total assets,
$2.69 million in total liabilities and $1.81 million in total
stockholders' equity.


ATLANTIC & PACIFIC: Sale of Assets to Romano for $350K Approved
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert D. Drain of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York authorized The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
Company, Inc., and affiliates to sell liquor store assets and
licenses to Deanna M. Romano for $350,000, plus inventory.

The sale is free and clear of liens, claims, interests and
encumbrances.

An auction and sale of the Acquired Assets was conducted on Aug. 3,
2016.  A sale hearing was held on Aug. 26, 2016.

Judge Drain authorized the Debtors to transfer the Acquired Assets,
including the assignment of certain unexpired leases of the Debtors
in connection therewith, in accordance with the terms of the
Purchase Agreement.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Order is available
for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/The_Great_Atlantic_3146_Order.pdf

The 14-day stay provided in Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d) is
waived.

The Purchaser:

          Deanna M. Romano
          24 Fredon Greendell Rd.
          Newton, NJ 07860
          Attn: Pasquale Romano, Jr.
          E-mail: romanos@embarqmail.com

The Purchaser's attorney:

          John D. Williams, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF JOHN D. WILLIAMS
          18 Church St., Suite 2015
          Newton, NJ 07860
          E-mail: jdwesq@mac.com

                     About Atlantic & Pacific

Based in Montvale, New Jersey, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
Company, Inc., and its affiliates are one of the nation's oldest
leading supermarket and food retailers, operating approximately
300 supermarkets, beer, wine, and liquor stores, combination food
and drug stores, and limited assortment food stores across six
Northeastern states.  The primary retail operations consist of
supermarkets operated under a variety of well known trade names,
or "banners," including A&P, Waldbaum's, SuperFresh, Pathmark,
Food
Basics, The Food Emporium, Best Cellars, and A&P Liquors.  The
Company employs approximately 28,500 employees, over 90% of whom
are members of one of twelve local unions whose members are
employed by the Debtors under the authority of 35 separate
collective bargaining agreements.

Then with 429 stores, A&P and its affiliates filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 10-24549) on Dec. 12, 2010,
and in 2012 emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a privately held
company with 320 supermarkets.

On July 19, 2015, with 300 stores, A&P and 20 affiliated debtors
each filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) after reaching
deals for the going concern sales of 120 stores.  The Debtors are
seeking joint administration under Case No. 15-23007.

As of Feb. 28, 2015, the Debtors reported total assets of $1.6
billion and liabilities of $2.3 billion.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as counsel, Evercore
Group L.L.C., as investment banker, FTI Consulting, Inc., as
financial advisor, Hilco Real Estate, LLC, as real estate advisor,
and Prime Clerk LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

Judge Robert D. Drain of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York issued an order directing joint
administration of the Chapter 11 cases of The Great Atlantic &
Pacific Tea Company, Inc., and its debtor affiliates under Lead
Case No. 15-23007.


AVANTOR PERFORMANCE: Moody's Hikes Corporate Family Rating to B1
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded the Corporate Family Rating
(CFR) to B1 from B2 and the probability of default rating (PDR) to
B1-PD from B2-PD of Avantor Performance Materials Holdings S.A.
(Avantor). Moody's also affirmed the first lien senior secured TL
at B1 and upgraded the second lien senior secured TL to B3 from
Caa1, and assigned B1 ratings to the $170 mil delayed draw TL, all
issued by Avantor's subsidiary Avantor Performance Materials
Holdings, Inc. The proceeds of the $400 million incremental TL will
be used to refinance NuSil Technology, LLC's existing senior
secured TL facility and to pay associated fees and expenses; the
proceeds of the delayed draw TL will be used to finance a pending
acquisition, expected to close within the next 120 days. The
outlook on the ratings is stable.

"The merger with Nusil, a leader in high margin specialty silicone
products, combined with a pending acquisition expands Avantor's
branded and specialty revenue profile while also modestly
delevering the balance sheet," according to Joseph Princiotta, VP-
Senior Credit Officer at Moody's and lead analyst responsible for
Avantor's ratings.

Ratings Upgraded:

   Avantor Performance Materials Holdings S.A.

   -- Corporate Family Rating to B1 from B2

   -- Probability of Default to B1-PD from B2-PD

   -- Ratings Outlook Stable

Ratings Affirmed:

   Avantor Performance Materials Holdings, Inc.

   -- $1,070 mm Sr. Sec. TL (Including $400m add-on) due 2022 –
      affirmed B1 (LGD3)

   -- $75m Sr. Sec. Revolver (Including $25m add-on) due 2021 –
      affirmed B1 (LGD3)

Ratings Upgraded:

   Avantor Performance Materials Holdings, Inc.

   -- $165m 2nd Lien TL due 2023 -- to B3 (LGD6) from Caa1 (LGD5)

   -- Ratings Outlook Stable

Ratings Assigned:

   Avantor Performance Materials Holdings, Inc.

   -- $200m Delayed Draw TL due 2022- B1 (LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

NuSil's is a leader in high margin specialty silicone products and
is the largest supplier for implantable silicone medical devices in
the US and Europe with long-term exclusive contracts with its two
largest medical device customers. The re-approval of silicone
breast implants by the US Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") for
cosmetic surgery in 2006 has reduced the risk of another regulatory
ban or significant product liability litigation over the rating
horizon. However, Moody's views the company as susceptible to
headline risk and notes the FDA advisories on silicone and silicone
gel-filled breast implants in 2011.

Avantor's B1 CFR reflects the stability and stickiness of the
combined company's branded and specialty revenue base, long-lived
customer relationships and a strong reputation with customers,
strong P&L performance in recent quarters, a relatively new and
impressive management team, and the establishment and stability of
positive free cash flow generation. The ratings also reflect the
recent repositioning of Avantor's manufacturing footprint, along
with other cost and pricing actions that have resulted in a
significant increase in EBITDA margins since the new management
team took the helm in mid-2014.

Avantor's competitive strengths also include FDA registered, ISO
certified, cGMP manufacturing sites in North America, Europe and
India that provide best-in-class global supply chain quality and
security management systems to large pharma customers. Avantor's
products are often specified into customer's processes at various
stages of drug product life cycles contributing to a certain
'stickiness' due to costs and risks of changing suppliers after
regulatory approvals.

The ratings remain constrained due to high leverage, despite
improvements on this metric, as well as the private equity
ownership. Other negative factors include the company's small
scale, limited segment diversification, and significant customer
concentration with large pharma companies and distributors.
However, this risk is mitigated by long term relationships and
ongoing attention to customer service excellence.

The merger with Nusil, combined with the effects of the pending
acquisition, are expected to improve profitability and leverage;
Moody's estimates pro forma leverage of roughly 4.6x (including
Moody's adjustments), compared to 5.3x at the time of the dividend
recap and downgrade in June of this year. In addition, Moody's
expects leverage to improve going forward and for the company to
achieve Moody's prior upgrade triggers in a reasonable timeframe,
probably in a year or less. (Adjusted debt includes standard
adjustments for unfunded pensions of $11 million and capitalized
rents of $18 million).

Moreover, modest capital expenditures and absence of a regular
dividend result in cash flow metrics that are stronger than
debt-to-EBITDA metrics would suggest, with retained-cash-flow to
total debt exceeding 10% in the near term and free-cash-flow to
total debt in the mid-to high-single digits percentage range.
Moody's expects these metrics to trend positively, reflecting debt
reduction with free cash flow and the aforementioned favorable
operational factors. Metrics give pro forma annualized credit to
certain actions by management, mainly the optimization of the U.S.
and European manufacturing footprint and certain cost reduction and
pricing actions recently implemented, Moody's added.

The ratings anticipate management will pursue bolt-on acquisitions
to build on or add to core strengths, but that acquisitions will be
not be large in scale and not materially add to debt or stress the
balance sheet.

Since 2014, commensurate with a new senior management team, the
company has refocused efforts on execution, customer service, R&D,
procurement, and implementation of price increases in select
customer accounts and markets, and is nearing completion on a
comprehensive plan to streamline and optimize manufacturing and
R&D. These actions are already evident in better margins and the
operational changes are expected to further improve margins and
cash flow going forward.

Moody's considers Avantor's liquidity position to be good with
expected on cash the balance sheet at close of $79 million and is
expected to generate positive free cash flow going forward for debt
reduction. Strong free cash flow and an anticipated $25 million
increase to $75 million revolving credit facility should cover the
company's ongoing basic cash needs, working capital needs, the step
up in capital expenditures, and still allow for further debt
reduction.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that metrics trend
favorably as robust free cash flow is applied to debt reduction and
as operations benefit from organic growth and the likelihood that
ongoing actions by management further improve operations. Moody's
expects leverage, in the absence of bolt-on acquisitions, to
decline to 4.0x in the near term.

Moody's is unlikely to upgrade the CFR as it is constrained at the
B1 level due to the private equity ownership and the risk that
future policies might shift and allow for a more leveraged balance
sheet and large dividends.

“Moody's would change the outlook to negative or downgrade the
CFR if debt is not reduced over the next few quarters and metrics
fail to trend favorably, which could occur if the company were to
make additional early acquisitions or if the current favorable
trends in operations were to reverse, which we don't expect to
happen. Continuation of high leverage, or if free cash flow were to
deteriorate to neutral or near neutral, we would consider a
downgrade to the ratings.” Moody's said.

Incorporated in Luxembourg, Avantor's operational headquarters are
located in Pennsylvania, USA. For the financial year-end (FYE)
December 2015, Avantor's Moody's-adjusted revenues and EBITDA were
approximately $456 million and $92 million, respectively and on an
unaudited basis. The company has approximately 1,200 employees
producing over 12,000 products across four broad product categories
(pharmaceutical, laboratory, microelectronic and diagnostic
products). Approximately 54% of Avantor's revenues are generated
from the US and Canada; 16% from Europe; 13% from India; 8% from
Asia; and 3% from Latin America.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global Chemical
Industry Rating Methodology published in December 2013.

Avantor manufactures and markets high-purity fine chemicals and
advanced materials for a range of applications and products are
marketed under various registered or trademarked brand names such
as J. T. Baker, Macron Fine Chemicals, Rankem, BeneSphera, and
POCH. Avantor was formed in 2010 when funds managed or advised by
private equity firm New Mountain Capital LLC (unrated) acquired
Mallinckrodt Baker from Covidien International Finance S.A. (A3
Stable). In 2011, Avantor completed the strategic acquisitions of
India-based RFCL Limited and Poland-based POCH S.A.

NuSil Investments, LLC, through its operating subsidiary NuSil
Technology, LLC, manufactures specialty silicone materials and is
the largest global supplier of resins for breast implants. New
Mountain Capital owns 60% of NuSil's equity. Management and other
employees own the remaining 40%. NuSil generated $179 million in
revenue for the twelve months ended August 31, 2016.


BANNER GLASS: Tiger Capital to Auction Assets on Sept. 20
---------------------------------------------------------
By order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Tiger Capital Group's
Commercial & Industrial division will conduct an online auction on
Sept. 20 of glass installation equipment, inventory, a vehicle
fleet and real property formerly owned by Banner Glass, Inc.

The sale features a large quantity of shop equipment as well as a
fleet of more than 30 well-maintained vehicles -- including Ford,
Chevrolet and GMC pickups, vans and cars as new as 2014.
Additionally, an approximate 6,400-square-foot commercial building
in the Crescent Design District of Leesburg, Va., partially
occupied by an existing tenant, is available for sale through
Marcus & Millichap.

Online bidding will commence Sept. 13 at http://www.SoldTiger.com/
and will close in rapid succession, live auction style, on Sept.
20, beginning at 10:30 a.m. (ET).  Previews of the assets will be
held Sept. 19 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (ET) at 8726
Baltimore-National Pike in Ellicott City, and at 305 Industrial Ct.
S.E. in Leesburg.

"This is an excellent opportunity for individuals, automobile
dealers, glass companies and other business owners to acquire high
quality, lightly used work trucks and tools," said Wayne Hecht,
Field Operations Manager at Tiger Group's Commercial & Industrial
division.  "This sale also offers businesses and real estate
investors a unique opportunity to acquire a tenanted commercial
property that offers prospects for residential redevelopment."

Vehicles up for bid include two 2014 Ford Transit Connect vans; a
2012 Ford Fusion; a 2010 Ford Focus SE; eight Ford-150 Pickups as
new as model year 2013; two Ford F-250 Super Duty pickups; seven
Ford E-250 Super Duty cargo vans, most from 2013 and 2011 model
years; six Ford E-150 vans, as new as 2013; as well as GMC Sierra
pickups and Savana vans.

Available shop equipment includes vertical air compressors, glass
cutting tables, wet belt abrasive sanders and other power and hand
tools, in addition to ladders, bench vises, bench grinders, shop
vacs and other equipment.  Material handling equipment, including
hydraulic pallet jacks and hand trucks, will also be offered for
sale.

Glass inventory includes windshields, flat glass, tempered glass
and mirrored glass.

Office furniture, computers, and plotters will also be available.

The two-bay warehouse, located at 305 Industrial Ct. S.E., in
Leesburg, is about 40 miles from central Washington, D.C.  The
offering from Marcus & Millichap presents investors and others with
an opportunity to acquire a centrally-located 6,396-square-foot
building on a 20,473- square-foot lot.  The former Banner Glass bay
is approximately 3,896 square feet and is built out as a glass shop
with administrative offices.  The 2,500-square foot tenanted bay is
occupied by an automotive upholsterer who has been there long-term
and is now on a month-to-month lease. Zoning allows for future
residential development.

For a full catalog of the items offered and details on how to
schedule a site visit and bid, go to: http://www.SoldTiger.com/

Banner Glass filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Md. Case No. 16-19233) in July 2016.


BASIC ENERGY: Lenders Temporarily Waive Term Loan Default
---------------------------------------------------------
Basic Energy Services, Inc., and certain of its subsidiaries
entered into the Temporary Limited Waiver and Consent to the Term
Loan Credit Agreement dated as of Feb. 17, 2016, by and among
Basic, as borrower, the lenders party thereto and U.S. Bank
National Association, as administrative agent for the Lenders.

Pursuant to the First Limited Waiver and Consent, the Lenders
temporarily waived the event of default under the Term Loan
Agreement requiring Basic to cause not less than 95% of the term
loan priority collateral to become subject to a perfected, first
priority lien in favor of the Administrative Agent for the benefit
of the secured parties to the Term Loan Agreement on or prior to
Aug. 31, 2016.  Also pursuant to the First Limited Waiver and
Consent, the Administrative Agent and the Lenders consented to the
sale by Basic Energy Services, LP to the Texas Department of
Transportation of a 0.513 acre tract of land situated in Howard
County, Texas and the related partial release of lien that would
have otherwise resulted in a violation the Term Loan Agreement. The
Sale Consent is conditioned upon the proceeds from the asset sale
being deposited into the escrow account established in connection
with entry into the Term Loan Agreement.

The First Limited Waiver and Consent becomes effective beginning on
the date that certain conditions have been satisfied and ending on
the earliest to occur of (i) the occurrence of or existence of any
event of default under the Term Loan Agreement, other than the
Collateral Anticipated Event of Default, (ii) notice from the
Administrative Agent or Required Lenders (as defined in the Term
Loan Agreement) of the occurrence or existence of any Temporary
Limited Waiver Default (as defined in the First Limited Waiver and
Consent) or (iii) the later of Sept. 13, 2016, or such later date
as the Required Lenders and Basic may agree in their respective
sole discretion.

In consideration for the Lenders providing the Collateral Waiver
and the Sale Consent, Basic will pay the interest on the principal
amount of all outstanding obligations under the Term Loan Agreement
at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the default rate under the
Term Loan Agreement, so long as any Collateral Anticipated Event of
Default or any other event of default is continuing.  In addition,
so long as any Collateral Anticipated Event of Default or any other
event of default is continuing, (i) Basic is not permitted to take
any action under any loan document that is conditioned upon there
being no default or event of default existing at the time of such
action and (ii) neither the Administrative Agent nor any Lender is
required to facilitate or otherwise permit any action under any
loan document that is conditioned upon there being no default or
event of default existing at the time of that action.

     Minimum Liquidity Temporary Limited Waiver and Consent

On Sept. 1, 2016, Basic and certain of its subsidiaries entered
into the Temporary Limited Waiver and Consent to the Term Loan
Agreement. Pursuant to the Second Limited Waiver and Consent, the
Lenders temporarily waived the event of default under the Term Loan
Agreement requiring Basic and its consolidated subsidiaries to
maintain unrestricted cash balances and cash equivalents of not
less than $50,000,000 as of any date.

The Second Limited Waiver and Consent becomes effective beginning
on the date that certain conditions have been satisfied and ending
on the earliest to occur of (i) the occurrence or existence of any
event of default under the Term Loan Agreement, other than the
Liquidity Anticipated Event of Default or the Collateral
Anticipated Event of Default, (ii) notice from the Administrative
Agent or the Required Lenders of the occurrence or existence of any
Temporary Limited Waiver Default (as defined in the Second Limited
Waiver and Consent), (iii) the later of Sept. 13, 2016, or such
later date as the Required Lenders and Basic may agree in their
respective sole discretion or (iv) as of any date the unrestricted
cash balances and cash equivalents of Basic and its consolidated
subsidiaries is less than $45,000,000.

In consideration for the Lenders providing the Liquidity Waiver,
Basic will pay the interest on the principal amount of all
outstanding obligations under the Term Loan Agreement at a
fluctuating rate per annum equal to the default rate under the
Term Loan Agreement, so long as the Liquidity Anticipated Event of
Default, the Collateral Anticipated Event of Default or any other
event of default is continuing.  In addition, so long as the
Liquidity Anticipated Event of Default or any other event of
default is continuing, (i) Basic is not permitted to take any
action under any loan document that is conditioned upon there being
no default or event of default existing at the time of such action
and (ii) neither the Administrative Agent nor any Lender is
required to facilitate or otherwise permit any action under any
loan document that is conditioned upon there being no default or
event of default existing at the time of that action.

                      About Basic Energy

Energy Services, Inc. provides a wide range of well site services
in the United States to oil and natural gas drilling and producing
companies, including completion and remedial services, fluid
services, well servicing and contract drilling.  These services are
fundamental to establishing and maintaining the flow of oil and
natural gas throughout the productive life of a well.  The
Company's broad range of services enables us to meet multiple needs
of its customers at the well site.

Basic Energy reported a net loss of $242 million in 2015
compared to a net loss of $8.34 million in 2014.  As of June 30,
2016, Basic Energy had $1.07 billion in total assets, $1.14 billion
in total liabilities, and a $62.4 million total stockholders'
deficit.

"If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or are otherwise
unable to obtain the funds required to make principal and interest
payments on our indebtedness, or if we otherwise fail to comply
with the various covenants in instruments governing any existing or
future indebtedness, we could be in default under the terms of such
instruments.  In the event of a default, the holders of our
indebtedness could elect to declare all the funds borrowed under
those instruments to be due and payable together with accrued and
unpaid interest, secured lenders could foreclose on any of our
assets securing their loans and we or one or more of our
subsidiaries could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. If our
indebtedness is accelerated, or we enter into bankruptcy, we may be
unable to pay all of our indebtedness in full.  Any of the
foregoing consequences could restrict our ability to grow our
business and cause the value of our common stock to decline," the
Company warned in its annual report for the year ended Dec. 31,
2015.

                          *    *     *

The TCR reported on March 14, 2016, that Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Basic Energy Services, Inc.'s Corporate Family Rating
(CFR) to Caa3 from Caa1, its senior unsecured notes rating to Ca
from Caa2, and lowered its Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating to
SGL-4 from SGL-3.  The outlook remains negative.

As reported by the TCR on Aug. 17, 2016, S&P Global Ratings lowered
its long-term corporate credit rating on TX-based oilfield services
company Basic Energy Services Inc. to 'CC' from 'CCC-'.
"The downgrade follows Basic's announcement on Aug. 15, 2016, that
it has decided to defer the coupon payment on its senior unsecured
notes maturing 2019," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst
Christine Besset.  "The payment due date was Aug. 15, 2016, and
Basic is using the 30-day grace period provided in the notes'
indenture because the company is in the process of restructuring
its balance sheet," she added.


BEAZER HOMES: Announces Preliminary Operating Results
-----------------------------------------------------
In conjunction with its proposed senior offering, Beazer Homes USA,
Inc., announced the following results for the first two months of
its fiscal fourth quarter.  New orders rose 23% compared to the
same period of the prior fiscal year, primarily driven by an
improved absorption pace, as community count was relatively flat
over the time period.  Additionally, the Company continues to
expect its fourth quarter backlog conversion ratio to be between
75% to 80%.

                    About Beazer Homes USA

Headquartered in Atlanta, Beazer Homes is a geographically
diversified homebuilder with active operations in 13 states within
three geographic regions in the United States.  The Company's homes
meet or exceed the benchmark for energy-efficient home construction
as established by ENERGY STAR and are designed with Choice Plans to
meet the personal preferences and lifestyles of its buyers.  In
addition, the Company is committed to providing a range of
preferred lender choices to facilitate transparent competition
between lenders and enhanced customer service.  The Company's
active operations are in the following states: Arizona, California
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Nevada, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia. Beazer
Homes is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker
symbol "BZH."

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $2.31 billion in total assets,
$1.67 billion in total liabilities and $641 million in total
stockholders' equity.

                           *     *     *

Beazer carries a 'B-' issuer credit rating, with "negative"
outlook, from Standard & Poor's.

In June 2015, Moody's Investors Service upgraded Beazer Homes USA,
Inc.'s Corporate Family Rating to B3 from Caa1 and its Probability
of Default Rating to B3-PD from Caa1-PD.

As reported by the TCR on Sept. 4, 2015, Fitch Ratings had affirmed
the ratings of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (NYSE: BZH), including the
company's Issuer Default Rating (IDR), at 'B-'.  Beazer's 'B-' IDR
reflects the company's execution of its business model in the
current moderately recovering housing environment, land policies,
and geographic diversity.


BEAZER HOMES: S&P Assigns 'B-' Rating on Proposed $300MM Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it assigned its 'B-' issue-level rating
(same as the corporate credit rating) to Atlanta-based homebuilder
Beazer Homes USA Inc.'s proposed $300 million senior unsecured
notes due 2022.  The recovery rating is '4', indicating S&P's
expectation of average (30% to 50%, upper half of the range)
recovery in the event of payment default.

The company will use the proceeds to fund the repayment of its
existing secured notes, with any remaining proceeds for general
corporate purposes.  S&P's corporate credit rating on Beazer
reflects S&P's view of the company's business risk as vulnerable,
due largely to its view of the sector's cyclical nature and the
company's relatively small platform compared with most public
homebuilding peers.  S&P assess the company's financial risk as
highly leveraged, because debt to EBITDA was about 8x as of
June 30, 2016.

Ratings List

Beazer Homes USA Inc.
Corporate Credit Rating                    B-/Stable/--

New Rating

Beazer Homes USA Inc.
Senior Unsecured
  $300 mil sr notes due 2022                B-
   Recovery Rating                          4H


BELIEVER'S BIBLE: Wants to Use Rehabber's Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------
Believer's Bible Christian Church, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Georgia for authorization to use
cash collateral.

Rehabber's Financial, Inc., d/b/a Aztec Financial, asserts a first
priority lien on the Church and its revenue to secure a claim of
approximately $1,300,000.

The Debtor believes that the Internal Revenue Service and the
Georgia Department of Revenue have filed tax liens on the Church.
The Debtor relates that it is unaware of any other party asserting
an interest in the cash collateral.

The Debtor tells the Court that it needs to use the cash collateral
to meet its ordinary operating expenses and maintain the Church.
The Debtor further tells the Court that it has no other source of
income other than the cash collateral.

The Debtor's projected Budget covers the period from September 2016
to February 2017.  The Budget provides for total expenses in the
amount of $236,742.

The Debtor proposes to grant Rehabber's Financial with replacement
liens in revenue generated post-petition of the same kind, extent,
and priority as those existing prepetition.  The Debtor further
proposes to make regular monthly mortgage payments to Rehabber's
Financial in the amount of $5,000, and to escrow sums for 2016
taxes.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/2L39fk

                About Believer's Bible Christian Church

Believer's Bible Christian Church, Inc., a Christian Reformed
Church, operates a church in various buildings located at 3685 and
3715 Campbellton Rd. S.W. Atlanta, Georgia.  It also owns a rental
property located at 2288 Fairburn Road, Atlanta, as well as two
vacant parcels and one parcel with an unexpired billboard lease.

Believer's Bible Christian Church, which was established in 1983,
filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 16-65531) on
Sept. 2, 2016.  The Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
assets and liabilities.

The Debtor's attorney:

         William A. Rountree, Esq.
         MACEY, WILENSKY & HENNINGS, LLC
         303 Peachtree Street, N.E., SUite 4420
         Atlanta, GA 30308
         Tel: (404) 584-1200
         Fax: (404) 681-4355
         E-mail: Wrountree@maceywilensky.com     


BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS: Borrows Add'l $1 Million from WAVI Holdings
--------------------------------------------------------------
As previously disclosed, BioLife Solutions, Inc., is a party to a
commitment letter dated May 12, 2016, with WAVI Holding AG pursuant
to which WAVI agreed to make a series of advances on
June 1, 2016, Sept. 1, 2016, Dec. 1, 2016, and March 1, 2017.
Pursuant to the Commitment Letter, on May 12, 2016, the Company
entered into a promissory note in favor of WAVI whereby the Company
agreed to pay WAVI the principal amount of all Advances under the
Note, plus interest.  The Note is unsecured, carries an annual
interest rate of 10% and matures on June 1, 2017.  WAVI is not
obligated to pay any Advance if an event of default has occurred or
is occurring.  In addition, if an event of default has occurred,
WAVI may, at its option, declare the Note to be immediately due and
payable, together with all unpaid interest, without further notice
or demand.  The Note also provides that the Company will not permit
any liens on its assets, subject to certain exceptions.

On Sept. 1, 2016, the Company borrowed $1,000,000 as an advance
under the Note, which will be subject to the terms and conditions
of the Note.

                    About BioLife Solutions

Bothell, Washington-based BioLife Solutions, Inc., develops and
markets patented hypothermic storage and cryo-preservation
solutions for cells, tissues, and organs, and provides contracted
research and development and consulting services related to
optimization of biopreservation processes and protocols.

BioLife reported a net loss of $4.99 million on $6.44 million of
product sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net
loss of $3.30 million on $6.19 million of product sales for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, BioLife had $10.6 million in total assets,
$3.00 million in total liabilities and $7.54 million in total
shareholders' equity.


BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS: T. Girschweiler Owns 30.2% Stake as of Aug. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Girschweiler was granted on May 4, 2015, stock options
exercisable at $2.06 for 15,000 common shares of BioLife Solutions,
Inc., through May 4, 2025.  The options vested on May 4, 2016.

On March 15, 2016, Mr. Girschweiler was granted stock options
exercisable at $1.90 for 10,000 common shares of the Company
through March 15, 2026.  The options vest on March 15, 2017.

On Aug. 8, 2016, Mr. Girschweiler exercised warrants to acquire
71,428 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.84 per
share.  Immediately thereafter, Mr. Girschweiler transferred the
71,428 shares to Taurus4757 GmbH.

As of Aug. 31, 2016, Mr. Girschweiler beneficially owns 4,407,427
shares of BioLife Solutions, consisting of 2,716,091 shares of
common stock held indirectly through Taurus, 71,429 shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants held directly,
1,544,194 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants
held indirectly through Taurus and 75,713 shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of stock options held directly and
exercisable within 60 days.  Those shares represent a total of
30.2% of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock.

Mr. Girschweiler has the sole power to vote or direct the vote of,
and to dispose or direct the disposition of, the entirety of the
number of shares.  Except for Taurus with respect to the securities
held by Taurus, there are no other persons known to have the right
to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or
the proceeds from the sale of, those securities.

As of Aug. 31, 2016, Taurus beneficially owns 4,260,285 shares of
the Issuer, consisting of 2,716,091 shares of common stock held
directly by Taurus, and 1,544,194 shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of warrants held directly by Taurus.  Those shares
represent a total of 29.5% of the Company's outstanding shares of
common stock.

Taurus has the sole power to vote or direct the vote of, and to
dispose or direct the disposition of, the entirety of the number of
shares.  Except for Girschweiler, there are no other persons known
to have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of
dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, those
securities.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                      https://is.gd/eL0Pcv

                     About BioLife Solutions

Bothell, Washington-based BioLife Solutions, Inc., develops and
markets patented hypothermic storage and cryo-preservation
solutions for cells, tissues, and organs, and provides contracted
research and development and consulting services related to
optimization of biopreservation processes and protocols.

BioLife reported a net loss of $4.99 million on $6.44 million of
product sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net
loss of $3.30 million on $6.19 million of product sales for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, BioLife had $10.6 million in total assets,
$3.00 million in total liabilities and $7.54 million in total
shareholders' equity.


BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS: WAVI Holding Holds 39.5% Stake as of Aug. 25
---------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, WAVI Holding AG disclosed that as of Aug. 25, 2016, it
beneficially owns 6,003,285 shares, consisting of: (a)  
3,676,074 shares of common stock held directly by it; and (b)
2,327,211 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants
held directly by it, of BioLife Solutions, Inc., representing 39.5
percent of the shares outstanding.

As of Aug. 25, 2016, Walter Villiger, chairman of Wavi Holding,
beneficially owns 6,074,714 shares of the Company, consisting of
3,676,074 shares of common stock held indirectly through WAVI,
71,429 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants
held directly, and 2,327,211 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of warrants held indirectly through WAVI.  Those shares
represent a total of 39.8% of the Company's outstanding shares of
common stock.

Mr. Villiger has the sole power to vote or direct the vote of, and
to dispose or direct the disposition of, the entirety of the number
of shares.  Except for WAVI with respect to the securities held by
WAVI, there are no other persons known to have the right to receive
or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the
proceeds from the sale of, such securities.

WAVI has the sole power to vote or direct the vote of, and to
dispose or direct the disposition of, the entirety of the number of
shares.  Except for Mr. Villiger, there are no other persons known
to have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of
dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, those
securities.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                     https://is.gd/Ck8ypo

                   About BioLife Solutions

Bothell, Washington-based BioLife Solutions, Inc., develops and
markets patented hypothermic storage and cryo-preservation
solutions for cells, tissues, and organs, and provides contracted
research and development and consulting services related to
optimization of biopreservation processes and protocols.

BioLife reported a net loss of $4.99 million on $6.44 million of
product sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net
loss of $3.30 million on $6.19 million of product sales for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, BioLife had $10.6 million in total assets,
$3.00 million in total liabilities and $7.54 million in total
shareholders' equity.


BIOSTAGE INC: Recurring Losses Raises Going Concern Doubt
---------------------------------------------------------
Biostage, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $2.71
million on $28,000 of revenues for the three months ended June 30,
2016, compared to a net loss of $4.50 million on $73,000 of
revenues for the same period in 2015.

For the six months ended May 31, 2016, the Company listed a net
loss of $5.18 million on $28,000 of revenues, compared to a net
loss of $7.12 million on $73,000 of revenues for the same period in
the prior year.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $9.42 million in total assets,
$1.94 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders' equity
of $7.48 million.

The Company has incurred substantial operating losses since its
inception, and as of June 30, 2016 has an accumulated deficit of
approximately $29.9 million.  The Company is currently investing
significant resources in development and commercialization of
products for use by clinicians and researchers in the field of
regenerative medicine.  The Company expects to continue to incur
operating losses and negative cash flows from operations in 2016
and in future years.  Management believes that the Company's cash
at June 30, 2016 will be sufficient to meet the Company's
obligations through December 31, 2016 and into early 2017.  These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern

The Company will need to raise additional funds in 2016 and in
future years to fund its operations. Cash requirements and cash
resource needs will vary significantly depending upon the timing
and the financial and other resource needs that will be required to
complete ongoing development and pre-clinical and clinical testing
of products as well as regulatory efforts and collaborative
arrangements necessary for the Company's products that are
currently under development.  The Company will seek to raise
necessary funds through a combination of publicly or private equity
offerings, debt financings, other financing mechanisms, or
strategic collaborations and licensing arrangements.  The Company
may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable
to them, if at all.

The Company's operations will be adversely affected if it is unable
to raise or obtain needed funding and may materially affect the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

A copy of the Form 10-Q filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission is available at:
                              
                       https://is.gd/mFoJHg
                          
Biostage, Inc., formerly Harvard Apparatus Regenerative Technology,
Inc., is a biotechnology company. The Company is engaged in
developing bioengineered organ implants based on its Cellframe
technology. Its Cellframe technology consists of a biocompatible
scaffold that is seeded with the recipient's own cells.  It is
developing its Cellframe technology to treat life-threatening
conditions of the esophagus, trachea or bronchus that are caused
due to cancer, infection, trauma or congenital abnormalities.  Its
Cellframe technology is engineered to stimulate the body's
signaling pathways and natural healing process to regenerate and
restore organ function.



BLACKBOARD INC: Moody's Affirms B2 Corporate Family Rating
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Blackboard Inc.'s B2 Corporate
Family Rating and B2-PD Probability of Default Rating. Moody's
assigned a B1 rating to Blackboard's new $135 million first-lien
revolving credit facility and new $984 million first-lien term loan
"B-4". Moody's also assigned a Caa1 rating to Blackboard's new $365
million second-lien notes. The B-4 term loan amends and extends the
maturity of the existing, $934 million B-3 term loan, while the new
second-lien debt replaces an equal amount of existing unsecured
notes. (In the event certain holders of the existing notes elect
not to exchange their notes for second-lien debt, Moody's will keep
the notes' Caa1 rating outstanding. Similarly, in the event that
term loan B-3 lenders do not amend and extend into the new B-4 term
loan, Moody's will keep the B-3 loan's B1 rating outstanding.) The
incremental $50 million of term loan proceeds will be used to pay
down an equivalent obligation at a subsidiary of Blackboard's
ultimate parent company, which formed the subsidiary earlier this
year in order to effect the $260 million acquisition of Higher One,
whose assets will be contributed to Blackboard simultaneously with
this transaction. Blackboard's outlook remains negative.

Issuer: Blackboard, Inc.

   -- Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

   -- Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

   -- Senior secured first-lien credit facilities maturing 2020
      and 2021, Assigned B1 (LGD3)

   -- Senior secured second-lien notes maturing 2022, Assigned
      Caa1 (LGD5)

Outlook, Remains Negative

RATING RATIONALE

The B2 CFR reflects Blackboard's continued high debt-to-EBITDA
leverage (including Moody's standard adjustments), which, although
it will show measurable improvement as a result of this
transaction, is still approximately 7.0 times (down from more than
7.5 times), high for the CFR. Additionally, Blackboard has
displayed stagnant growth in its core domestic product, and weak
free cash flow, which will be burdened by integration costs for the
recently acquired Sequoia and Higher One businesses, as well as by
higher interest costs associated with the new debt. The
amend-and-extend and exchange transaction improves Blackboard's
debt-maturity profile and provides a larger, $135 million revolver,
which should be undrawn at this transaction's closing early in the
fourth quarter, a strong cash-flow period for the company.

The B2 CFR is supported by Blackboard's high level of revenue
visibility, with 85% of LTM June 2016 revenues coming from
recurring products and services, and underpinned by its 92% renewal
rates in 2015. Meanwhile, the operating contributions from Sequoia
and Higher One's CASHNet business provide revenue diversification,
good margins, and a modest amount of growth to Blackboard's top
line, which has been stagnant for many quarters. But the
acquisitions will come with incremental integration, legal, and
transition costs. Moody's expects their integration will have a
significant negative impact on Blackboard's short-term cash flow,
turning FCF-to-debt leverage to virtually zero in calendar 2016.

Growth in Blackboard's North American Higher Education ("NAHE") and
K-12 business segments has long been flat, even negative, with
particular weakness in the K-12 business of late. Meanwhile, NAHE's
weakness has been due in part to the delayed launch of the
Blackboard Ultra software, which was finally released in mid-2016.
However, given operating seasonality tied to the academic year,
revenue and EBITDA growth from the new Ultra product launch is not
expected until mid-2017.

Moody's considers Blackboard's liquidity adequate, given our
expectations for flat to negative free cash flow due to increased
M&A-related expenses, modest cash balances, and significant
availability under the new $135 million revolver, despite
pronounced seasonal utilization. In order to capture growth
opportunities in a vertical that is rapidly adopting new
technologies, the company has focused not on debt reduction but
rather on spending initiatives to support revenue growth that has
yet to materialize, and Moody's negative outlook is based partly on
this development. Moreover, ongoing high leverage is weak compared
to Blackboard's software peers, and has constrained the company as
it navigates through a highly competitive environment. The negative
outlook, then, also reflects Moody's view that the company will
need to demonstrate improved top line and profit measures and show
seamless transition and integration with regard to its expanding
business model over the ratings horizon.

The ratings could be downgraded if measurable improvements in
revenue fail to materialize, Moody's-adjusted debt-to-EBITDA
leverage does not hold below 7.0 times, liquidity declines
materially, or the company pursues acquisitions that add to
financial leverage. The B2 CFR could be upgraded if the company
were to demonstrate meaningful revenue growth,
free-cash-flow-to-debt reaches high-single-digit percentages, and
debt-to-EBITDA were to improve to near 5.0 times on a sustained
basis.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Software
Industry published in December 2015.


BON-TON STORES: Incurs $38.7 Million Net Loss in July 30 Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $38.7 million on $559 million of net sales and other income for
the 13 weeks ended July 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $39.6
million on $571 million of net sales and other income for the 13
weeks ended Aug. 1, 2015.

For the 26 weeks ended July 30, 2016, the Company reported a net
loss of $76.6 million on $1.16 billion of net sales and other
income compared to a net loss of $73.6 million on $1.19 billion of
net sales and other income for the 26 weeks ended Aug. 1, 2015.

As of July 30, 2016, Bon-Ton Stores had $1.48 billion in total
assets, $1.52 billion in total liabilities and a $38.5 million
total shareholders' deficit.

In the second quarter of 2015, the Company recognized a gain on
insurance recovery of $748 related to a fire at one of the
Company's stores, which is shown separately in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.

The Company is party to legal proceedings and claims that arise
during the ordinary course of business.  In the opinion of
management, the ultimate outcome of any such litigation and claims
will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
position, results of operations or liquidity.

At July 30, 2016, the Company had $7.0 million in cash and cash
equivalents and $224.8 million available under our Second Amended
Revolving Credit Facility (before taking into account the minimum
borrowing availability covenant under such facility).  Excess
availability was $265.2 million as of the comparable prior year
period.  The unfavorable excess availability comparison primarily
reflects the repayment of our mortgage facility in January 2016,
partially offset by improved cash flows from operating activities.

The Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q is available from the
SEC Web site at https://is.gd/dFAh7B

                      About Bon-Ton Stores

The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., with corporate headquarters in York,
Pennsylvania and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, operates 270 stores, which
includes nine furniture galleries and four clearance centers, in
26 states in the Northeast, Midwest and upper Great Plains under
the Bon-Ton, Bergner's, Boston Store, Carson's, Elder-Beerman,
Herberger's and Younkers nameplates.  The stores offer a broad
assortment of national and private brand fashion apparel and
accessories for women, men and children, as well as cosmetics and
home furnishings.  For further information, please visit the
investor relations section of the Company's Web site at
http://investors.bonton.com.          

Bon-Ton Stores reported a net loss of $57.05 million on $2.71
billion of net sales for the fiscal year ended Jan. 30, 2016,
compared to a net loss of $6.97 million on $2.75 billion of net
sales for the fiscal year ended Jan. 31, 2015.

                           *     *     *

As reported in the TCR on Dec. 4, 2015, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Bon-Ton Stores's Corporate Family Rating to Caa1 from
B3.  The company's Speculative Grade Liquidity rating was affirmed
at SGL-2.  The rating outlook is stable.  The downgrade considers
the continuing and persistent negative pressure on Bon-Ton's
revenue and EBITDA margins which has been accelerating during the
course of fiscal 2015.

As reported by the TCR on Aug. 22, 2016, S&P Global Ratings raised
its corporate credit rating on the York, Pa.-based The Bon-Ton
Stores Inc. to 'CCC+' from 'CCC'.  The outlook remains negative.  
"The upgrade reflects our view of Bon-Ton's somewhat improved
liquidity after refinancing its A-1 ABL term loan tranche with an
extended maturity to March 2021 and enhanced liquidity from the
additional $50 million in borrowing capacity to address upcoming
debt maturity in 2017.


BORDER EXPRESS: Seeks to Employ Sparkman Shepard as Attorneys
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jared Sharp, Interim Director and President of Border Express,
Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Alabama an amended application to employ these Chapter
11 attorneys: Tazewell T. Shepard, III, Esq., Kevin M. Morris,
Esq., and Tazewell T. Shepard, IV, Esq., of Sparkman, Shepard &
Morris P.C.

The attorneys will:

   -- assist in drafting a disclosure statement and plan of
      reorganization;

   -- file any motions and adversary proceeding complaints as may
      be necessary to the proper administration of the Estate
      during the Chapter 11 case;

   -- represent the Estate in any resulting trial and the various
      hearings through confirmation; and

   -- prepare necessary orders and documents.

The hourly billing rate for Mr. Shepard is $350, for Mr. Morris is
$295 and for Mr. Shepard, IV, is $250.

According to the Amended Application, the attorneys are
"disinterested person" as that term is defined in Section 101(13)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

Tazewell T. Shepard, Esq., states that he and his law firm have no
connection, financial or otherwise, with the Debtor, the Debtor's
creditors or any other party in interest and that he knows of no
conflict or potential conflict of interest with his proposed
appointment as attorney for the debtor-in-possession, except for
unrelated certain matters.

Sparkman Shepard can be reached at:

          Tazewell T. Shepard, III, Esq.
          Kevin M. Morris, Esq.
          Tazewell T. Shepard, IV, Esq.
          SPARKMAN, SHEPARD & MORRIS P.C.
          303 Williams Ave. SW, Suite 1411
          Huntsville, AL 35801
          E-mail: kevin@ssmattorneys.com
                  taze@ssmattorneys.com
                  ty@ssmattorneys.com

                   About Border Express, Inc.

Border Express, Inc. d/b/a Frizzle's Restaurant filed a chapter 11
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 16-82288) on August 11, 2016.
The petition was signed by Jared Sharp, president.  The Debtor is
represented by Jarrod M. Maddox, Esq., at Jones Walker, LLP.  The
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $0 to $50,000 at the
time of the filing.

The Company is an Alabama corporation and owns and operates a
restaurant in Huntsville, Alabama, doing business as "Frizzle's
Restaurant."



BORDER EXPRESS: Wants Unsecured Financing for Sept. 7 Payroll
-------------------------------------------------------------
Border Express, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Alabama for authorization to obtain unsecured
post-petition financing from RREF CB SBL II-AL KKI, LLC.

RREF CB is the 90% owner of the Debtor's stock, following a
purchase of 450 shares of the Debtor's stock at a public sale held
on May 31, 2016.

The Debtor relates that its most recent payroll came due on August
24, 2016.  The Debtor further relates that it lacked sufficient
funds to make this payroll and was able to  obtain interim approval
from the Court to obtain an unsecured loan from its  RREF CB, in an
amount not to exceed $6,195.69, to pay these wages.  The Debtor
adds that RREF CB timely funded this unsecured loan and the Debtor
was able make its payroll as scheduled.

The Debtor tells the Court that its next scheduled payroll comes
due on Sept. 7, 2016.  The Debtor again anticipates that it will
not have sufficient funds to make this payroll.  The Debtor
contends that it again obtained interim approval from the Court to
obtain an unsecured loan from RREF CB, in an amount not to exceed
$6,500.00, to pay these wages.  The Debtor further contends that
RREF is prepared to timely fund this unsecured loan so that Debtor
will be able to make its payroll as scheduled.

The relevant terms, among others, of the proposed financing are:

     (1) Commitment: Amount not to exceed $12,695.69.

     (2) Interest Rate: 0% per annum

     (3) Maturity Date: October 31, 2016.

The Debtor tells the Court that it has no ability to obtain
financing on terms more favorable than those proposed by RREF CB.
The Debtor further tells the Court that without the provision of
the contemplated financing, the Debtor will be forced to cease
operations and will lose the going concern value of its business.

A full text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 1, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/hivaW8

A full-text copy of the proposed Promissory Note, dated Sept. 1,
2016, is available at https://is.gd/d6qvjH

                      About Border Express

Border Express, Inc., doing business as Frizzle's Restaurant, filed
a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 16-82288) on
August 11, 2016. The petition was signed by Jared Sharp, president.
The Debtor is represented by Jerrod M. Maddox, Esq., at Jones
Walker, LLP.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $0 to
$50,000 at the time of the filing.


BOREAL WATER: Expects to Close Water Agreement by Oct. 7
--------------------------------------------------------
Boreal Water Collection, Inc. and BB Development XXVIII LLC entered
into a contract for sale (purchase agreement) on Jan. 6, 2016, of
an artesian spring, water supply and existing facility located in
the Town of Callicoon, New York.  Boreal Water is the successor to
Leisure Time Spring Water, Inc., which had a first right of refusal
regarding the premises.

On Sept. 6, 2016, the parties entered into an addendum to the
Contract of Sale, the Second Addendum to Purchase Agreement between
BB Development XXVIII LLC, as seller, and Boreal Water Collection,
Inc., as purchaser.

The Addendum provides that time is of the essence and closing of
the transaction (purchase of the artesian spring) will be no later
than 10 a.m., Friday, Oct. 7, 2016.  Boreal Water Collection, Inc.
agreed to the immediate release of the Contract Deposit or
"Downpayment" of $60,000 to BB Development XXVIII LLC; forever
releasing its rights to the Contract Deposit (should the
transaction not close).  Boreal is to pay the sum of $25,000 to the
Seller on or before 5 p.m., Friday Sept. 9, 2016; described as
non-refundable "Additional Earnest Money" "applicable to the
purchase price of the subject property."  The Company "shall
continue to pay all sums due Seller each month as contained in the
Water Agreement commencing September of 2016 no later than the 20th
day of each month."  The parties reserve all rights regarding
Notice of Termination of the Water Agreement.

                       About Boreal Water

Kiamesha Lake, N.Y.-based Boreal Water Collection, Inc., is a
personalized bottled water company specializing in premium custom
bottled water.

Boreal Water reported a net loss of $886,000 on $2.41 million of
sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared with net income of
$613,000 on $2.15 million of sales for the year ended Dec. 31,
2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $3 million in total assets,
$2.68 million in total liabilities, and $314,000 in total
stockholders' equity.

Terry L. Johnson, CPA, in Casselberry, Florida, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.  The accounting firm noted that  the
Company has incurred a deficit of approximately $3.6 million and
has used approximately $800,000 of cash due to its operating
activities in the two years ended Dec. 31, 2014.  The Company may
not have adequate readily available resources to fund operations
through Dec. 31, 2015.  This raises substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


BOULEVARD ENTERTAINMENT: Taps Demetra Gregory-McKie as Bookkeeper
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Boulevard Entertainment Greenville, LLC, seeks authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina to employ
Demetra Gregory-McKie as a bookkeeper and preparer of monthly
operating reports for the debtor-in-possession.

Ms. Gregory-McKie's fee is $35 per hour.  She assures the Court
that she does not hold or represent an interest adverse to the
bankruptcy estate, and is a "disinterested person" as defined in
Section 101(14) and (31) of the Bankruptcy Code.

                  About Boulevard Entertainment

Boulevard Entertainment Greenville, LLC sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 16-03313)
on July 1, 2016.  The Debtor is represented by Robert H. Cooper,
Esq., at The Cooper Law Firm.



BREMAR DEVELOPMENT: Hires Stearns Weaver as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
Bremar Development, LLC seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ
Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. as
bankruptcy counsel, nunc pro tunc to the August 17, 2016 petition
date.

The Debtor requires Stearns Weaver to:

   (a) give advice to the Debtor with respect to its powers and
       duties as debtor-in-possession and the continued management

       of its business operations;

   (b) advise the Debtor with respect to its responsibilities in
       complying with the U.S. Trustee's Operating Guidelines and
       Reporting Requirements and with the rules of the Court;

   (c) prepare motions, pleadings, orders, applications, adversary

       proceedings, and other legal documents necessary in the
       administration of the case;

   (d) protect the interests of the Debtor in all matters pending
       before the Court; and

   (e) represent the Debtor in negotiations with its creditors in
       the preparation and confirmation of a plan.

Stearns Weaver will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Kristopher Pearson       $540
       Associates               $320-$365
       Paralegals               $300-$325

Stearns Weaver will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Stearns Weaver received from the Debtor a pre-petition retainer in
the total amount of $35,000, plus $1,717 for the filing.

Kristopher E. Pearson, shareholder of Stearns Weaver, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

Stearns Weaver can be reached at:

       Kristopher E. Pearson, Esq.
       STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLER  
       ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A.
       Museum Tower Building, Suite 2200
       150 West Flagler Street
       Miami, FL 33130
       Tel: (305) 789-3200
       Fax: (305) 789-3395
       E-mail: kpearson@stearnsweaver.com

                  About Bremar Development

Bremar Development, LLC, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case No. 16-21328) on Aug. 17, 2016.  The petition was signed
by Jorge D. Marrero, sole managing member.  The Debtor is
represented by Kristopher E. Pearson, Esq., at Stearns Weaver
Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A.  The case is assigned to
Judge Laurel M. Isicoff.  The Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million at the time of the
filing.



BROOKLYN RENAISSANCE: Court Narrows Claims in JJCC Suit
-------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned JJCC Real Estate LLC, Plaintiff, v. Brooklyn
Renaissance, LLC, Defendant, Adv. Pro. No. 16-01073-cec (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y.), Chief Judge Carla E. Craig of the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York granted the
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with respect to the second and fourth
causes of action and denied with respect to the first and third
causes of action.

Brooklyn Renaissance, LLC, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint
filed by JJCC Real Estate LLC. The Plaintiff and the Defendant
entered into a contract for the sale of real property, including
the building located at 557 Union Street, in Brooklyn, New York, by
the Defendant to the Plaintiff.  The Plaintiff refused to close
based upon its contention that the Defendant had not provided title
insurance as required by the contract. The Defendant declared a
default under the contract for sale and retained the Plaintiff's
deposit as liquidated damages.

The Plaintiff commenced this adversary proceeding seeking the
return of its deposit, arguing that the Defendant had breached the
contract for sale by failing to deliver marketable title at
closing. the Defendant responded by filing the Motion to Dismiss.

On the Second Cause of Action of Unjust Enrichment Claim, in order
to state a claim for unjust enrichment under New York law, a
plaintiff must allege, "(1) that the defendant benefited; (2) at
the plaintiff's expense; and (3) that equity and good conscience
require restitution.  Judge Craig finds that neither party disputes
the existence of a valid, enforceable contract and its application
to the subject matter at issue. The Plaintiff and the Defendant
entered into the PSA on August 30, 2015. The dispute involves the
retention of the Deposit, which is covered by the PSA. The
Plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim is based on the same factual
allegations and seeks the same amount of damages as its breach of
contract claims. The Plaintiff did not seek to rescind the contract
before filing suit, and the Plaintiff's core claims rest on the
allegation that it had performed its obligations under a valid,
enforceable contract the scope of which clearly covers the instant
dispute. Therefore, the Plaintiff's second cause of action for
unjust enrichment must be dismissed, Judge Craig ruled.

The Plaintiff's fourth cause of action for fraud also fails, Judge
Craig said, noting that the Plaintiff has failed to adequately
plead fraud in accordance with Rule 9(b). In addition, this cause
of action is duplicative of the breach of contract claims and does
not assert any injury or seek any remedy distinct from those
claims, and must be dismissed for that reason as well.

A full-text copy of the Opinion dated August 18, 2016 is available
at https://is.gd/WBIBnq from Leagle.com.

JJCC Real Estate LLC, Plaintiff, is represented by Robert J.
Spence, Esq. -- Spence Law Office, P.C..

Brooklyn Renaissance, LLC, Defendant, is represented by Steven R.
Schoenfeld, Esq. -- srs@ddw-law.com -- DelBello Donnellan
Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr LLP.

                   About Brooklyn Renaissance

Brooklyn Renaissance, LLC, which manages various parcels of real
property located in Kings, New York and Suffolk County, New York,
sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No.
15-43122) on July 6, 2015 in Brooklyn. James McGown, the managing
member, signed the petition. The case is assigned to Judge Nancy
Hershey Lord.

The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and less
than $10 million in debt.

The Debtor tapped Jonathan S. Pasternak, Esq., at DelBello
Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, in White Plains, New
York, as counsel.


BUFFINGTON MASON: Sale of Texas Property for $3.5M Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Tony M. Davis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Texas authorized Buffington Mason Park, Ltd., to sell
approximately 20 acres of real property and three lots located in
Harris County, Texas to Jabez Development, LP, for $3,500,000.

The sale is free and clear of all claims.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Aug. 22, 2016.  The sale
hearing was conducted on Aug. 29, 2016.

At the closing, any ad valorem taxes owed by the Debtor for years
prior to 2016 will be paid in full.

At the closing the Debtor will cause to be paid the United States
Trustee ("UST") fees as follows: $10,400 as an estimated payment
for the third quarter of 2016.

At the closing the Debtor will retain $32,500 ("Retained Funds")
for payment of administrative expense claims of professionals hired
by the Debtor and any fees owed to the UST for quarters after the
third quarter of 2016.

At the Closing the Debtor will cause to be paid all costs of
closing, including fees for a title policy and fees incurred by the
title company will be paid.

The funds remaining after the payment of any ad valorem taxes, UST
fees, Retained Funds and cost of closing will the "Remaining
Funds".

At the closing, United Development IV, LP ("UDF") will deliver to
the Title Company written instructions for disbursement of the
Remaining Funds to UDF or entities designated by UDF and the Title
Company will make disbursements at the in accordance with such
written instruction.

                   About Buffington Mason Park

Buffington Mason Park, Ltd., is a Texas limited partnership formed
on or about Aug.25, 2008 for single family residential development.
It is part of the Buffington Land Group, Ltd. Its general partner
is Buffington Mason Park Management, LLC, which owns a 0.5%
interest, and its limited partner is Buffington Land, Ltd., which
holds 99.5%.

Buffington Mason Park, Ltd., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
W.D. Tex. Case No. 16-10396) on April 1, 2016.  Judge Tony M. Davis
is assigned to the case.

The Debtor estimated assets in the range of $1 million to $10
million and $100 million to $500 million in debt.

Stephen W. Sather, Esq., at Barron & Newburger, P.C. serves as the
Debtor's counsel.

The petition was signed by T. Blake Buffington, Jr., VP of general
partner.



CAPITOL BC RESTAURANTS: Taps Best Buy as Auctioneer
---------------------------------------------------
Capitol BC Restaurants, LLC seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Masachusetts to employ Joseph
Benigno and Best Buy Auctioneers Appraisers & Liquidators to market
and sell personal property in Newark, Delaware.

The Debtor requires Best Buy to collect the Personal Property and
then stage and auction the Personal Property at Best Buy's
warehouse and via the internet.  The Debtor will file a separate
motion to sell the Personal Property by public auction.

Upon completion of the public sale, Best Buy will submit an
application seeking compensation for services rendered and for
reimbursement of expenses.  Best Buy's application for compensation
will be submitted to the Court and will request compensation that
will not exceed 10% of the first $100,000 realized from the sale of
the Personal Property, 4% of the next $400,000, and 3% of the
balance.

Additional expenses that Best Buy may charge include fees of 4% of
the purchase price in the event the particular property is sold
using the internet auction mechanism, and 4% of the purchase price
in the event that the high bidder uses a credit card to pay the
purchase price.

Joseph Benigno, principal of Best Buy, assured the Court that the
firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

Best Buy can be reached at:

       Joseph Benigno
       BEST BUY AUCTIONEERS
       APPRAISERS & LIQUIDATORS
       11 Russell Avenue
       South River, NJ 08882
       Tel: (877) 788-7572

                      About Capitol BC, LLC

Capitol BC, LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
M.D.N.C.. Case No. 15-10411) on June 10, 2016. Hon. Joan N. Feeney
presides over the case. Murphy & King professionals represents the
Debtor as counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10,000 million
in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities. The
petition was signed by Bruce A. Erickson, CRO.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


CCH JOHN EAGAN: Oct. 19 Plan Confirmation Hearing
-------------------------------------------------
Judge Erik P. Kimball of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida conducted a hearing on August 31, 2016, to
consider approval of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement for
First Amended Plan of Reorganization for CCH John Eagan II Homes,
L.P.

The Court finds that the Disclosure Statement contains "adequate
information" regarding the Plan in accordance with 11 U.S.C.
Section 1125(a), and accordingly, the Disclosure Statement is
approved.

October 19, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., is scheduled as confirmation
hearing and hearing on fee applications.

The deadline for filing objections to claims is Oct. 5.  The
deadline for filing ballots accepting or rejecting the Plan is Oct.
12.  The deadline for filing objections to confirmation is Oct. 14.
The deadline for the Debtor to file a report of Plan Proponents
and confirmation affidavit is Oct. 14.

Prior to the Disclosure Statement hearing, the Debtor filed a First
Amended Disclosure Statement dated Aug. 30, 2016, a full-text copy
of which is available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/15-31082-381.pdf
to include projections based on the two options provided by Class 5
claimants (Unsecured Claims of Trade Creditors) in the Plan.  The
First Amended Disclosure Statement provides projections based on
100% of Class 5 claimants selecting Option 1, projections based on
50% of Class 5 claimants selecting Option 1 and 50% selecting
Option 2, and provides projections based on 100% of Class 5
claimants selecting Option 2.

Class 5 Allowed Unsecured Claims of Trade Creditors may elect to be
paid an amount equal to 90% of their Allowed Claim, without
interest, within 90 days of the Effective Date, in full
satisfaction of the claim, or may elect to be treated in accordance
with the treatment provided for General Unsecured Claims in Class 8
of the Plan.

Beginning one year following the Effective Date, Class 8 Class 8
Allowed General Unsecured Claimants will be paid equal monthly
payments over the next 48 months totaling 100% of their Allowed
General Unsecured Claim, without interest.

                      About CCH John Eagan
     
Headquartered in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, CCH John Eagan II
Homes, L.P., owns and operates a 180 unit multifamily apartment
complex in Atlanta, Georgia commonly known as Magnolia Park
Apartments Phase II.  It filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 15-31082) on Dec. 1, 2015, and is
represented by Eric A. Rosen, Esq., at Fowler White Burnett, P.A.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets at
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities at between $10
million and $50 million.

Judge Erik P. Kimball presides over the case.

The petition was signed by Yashpal Kakkar, managing member, CCH
John Eagan II Partners, LLC, GP.


CHC GROUP: Hires Sage-Popovich as Inventory Appraisers
------------------------------------------------------
CHC Group Ltd. and its debtor-affiliates seek authorization from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to
employ sage-popovich, inc. ("SPI") as inventory appraisers, nunc
pro tunc to the August 8, 2016 retention date.

The Debtors require SPI to:

   (a) perform on-site inspections at 8 major stations of the
       Company in 5 countries, with test counts at 50% by reported

       cost or estimated value, and audits of the Company to
       include inventory, certifications, manuals and tech
       library, evaluation of computer, security, fire and
       environmental protection systems, sampling of documents
       required for commercially reasonable trace, and a review of

       third party vendors (the "Physical Audit").

   (b) prepare and present a report following the Physical Audit   

       providing Fair Market Value, Net Orderly Liquidation Value,
       Forced Liquidation Value in US dollars for the Spare Parts
       and findings related to parts tracking, documentation,
       inventory levels, and overall systems. FMV, NOLV and FLV
       will be shown by location, fleet type, condition and by
       type of part. Tooling and other named ineligibles will be
       specifically excluded.  NOLV will be figured for an 18
       month time frame; FLV will be figured on an auction basis
       over 4 to 6 months.  Further, the Report will track in
       transit and out for repair items, as reported by the
       Company, and report on the levels of same;

   (c) in addition, the Report will include: audit discussion,
       sampling results, recommendations, value definitions, value

       discussion, valuation methodology, parts excluded, market
       research, appraisal assumptions and limiting conditions,   
       discussion of marketing time and exit strategy.

SPI will be paid at these daily rates:

       Nick Popovich                $3,500
       Audit Team Leader            $1,500
       Consultants (domestic)       $1,000
       Consultants (international)  $1,200
       Support Staff                $250

SPI will operate on a fixed fee of $320,000 for physical
audit/report, plus reasonable out of pocket expenses.  Those
expenses will be charged as incurred, and include reimbursement for
reasonable travel and out-of-pocket expenses including, but not
limited to, airfares, hotels, meals, ground transport, parking,
shipping, costs of reproduction, typing, wireless access, computer
usage, legal counsel and other direct expenses.  Air travel in
excess of five hours will be in business class.

The Debtors' non-Debtor affiliate 38286 Bermuda Ltd. paid SPI an
initial retainer of $223,000.

Brian Bolin, sales director of SPI, assured the Court that the firm
is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

The Bankruptcy Court will hold a hearing on the application on
September 22, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. Objections, if any, are due on
September 15, 2016 at 4:00 p.m.

SPI can be reached at:

       Brian Bolin
       SAGE-POPOVICH, INC.
       P.O. Box One
       Valparaiso, IN 46384
       Tel: (219) 464-8320

                       About CHC Group Ltd.

Headquartered in Irving, Texas, CHC is a global commercial
helicopter services company primarily servicing the offshore oil
and gas industry. CHC maintains bases on six continents with major
operations in the North Sea, Brazil, Australia, and several
locations across Africa, Eastern Europe, and South East Asia. CHC
maintains a fleet of 230 medium and heavy helicopters, 67 of which
are owned by it and the remainder are leased from various
third-party lessors.

CHC Group Ltd. and 42 of its wholly-owned subsidiaries each filed
a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 16-31854) on May 5, 2016. As of
Jan. 31, 2016, CHG had $2.16 billion in total assets and $2.19
billion in total liabilities. The Debtors have hired Weil, Gotshal
& Manges LLP as counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP as special
aircraft counsel, PJT Partners LP as investment banker, Seabury
Corporate Advisors LLC as financial advisor, CDG Group, LLC as
restructuring advisor, and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on May 13, 2016, appointed five
creditors of CHC Group Ltd. to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors.


CHICAGO ROAD: Wants to Employ Thomas W. Lynch P.C. as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago Road Corporation seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Illinois to employ Thomas W.
Lynch, P.C., as Counsel to the Debtor, nunc pro tunc to the
Petition Date.

As counsel, the Lynch Firm will:

   a. render legal advice with respect to the powers and duties
      of the Debtor-in-Possession;

   b. negotiate, draft, and pursue all documentation necessary
      in this case;

   c. prepare, on behalf of the Debtor, all applications,
      necessary pleadings, orders reports, and other legal papers
      with respect to this proceeding, and to render other legal
      services as may be necessary;

   d. perform necessary legal work regarding approval of the
      disclosure statement(s) and plan;

   e. appear in Court and protecting the interests of the Debtor
      before the Court;

   f. assist with any disposition of the Debtor's assets, by sale
      or otherwise;

   g. attend all meetings and negotiating with representatives of
      creditors, the United States Trustee, and other
      parties-in-interest;

   h. provide legal advice regarding bankruptcy law, corporate
      law, corporate governance, transactional, tax, labor,
      litigation, and other issues to the Debtor in connection
      with the Debtor's ongoing business operations; and

   i. perform other necessary legal work as required for this
      case.

The current hourly rates of the Lynch Firm are:

      Professional          Rate per hour
      ------------          -------------
      Thomas W. Lynch            $300
      Laxmi P. Sarathy           $300
      Legal assistants/           $60
      paralegals

Prior to the Petition Date, the Lynch Firm received a total of
$1,717 for filing fees and $1,100 for attorney's fees from Robert
Terzich, President of the Debtor.

Thomas W. Lynch assures the Court that his firm has no connections
with the creditors, any other party in interest, their respective
attorneys and accountants, the United States Trustee or any person
employed in the office of the United States Trustee.

The Lynch Firm can be reached at:

          Thomas W. Lynch, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS W. LYNCH, P.C.
          9231 S. Roberts Road
          Hickory Hills, IL 60457
          Telephone: (708) 598-5999
          Facsimile: (708) 598-6299
          E-mail: twlpc@worldnet.att.net

                       About Chicago Road

Chicago Road Corporation is an active Illinois Corporation that
owns a movie theater/ entertainment center located in Dolton,
Illinois.

Chicago Road filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.
16-26185) on August 15, 2016.




CHRISTOPHER COLLINS: Oct. 13 Plan Confirmation Hearing
------------------------------------------------------
Judge K. Rodney May of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida issued an order conditionally approving the
disclosure statement explaining Christopher R. Collins' Chapter 11
plan of reorganization.

Any written objections to the Disclosure Statement must be filed no
later than seven days prior to the date of the hearing on
confirmation.  If no objections are filed within the time fixed,
the conditional approval of the Disclosure Statement will become
final.  Any objections or requests to modify the Disclosure
Statement will be considered at the Confirmation Hearing.

The court will conduct a hearing on confirmation of the Plan,
including timely filed objections to confirmation, objections to
the disclosure statement, motions for cramdown, applications for
compensation, and motions for allowance of administrative claims on
October 13, 2016, at 11:00 a.m.

An election of application of Bankruptcy Code Section 1111(b)(2) by
a class of secured creditors may be made at any time prior to the
conclusion of the Confirmation Hearing. The hearing may be
adjourned from time to time by announcement made in open court
without further notice. If the Plan is not confirmed, the court
will also consider dismissal or conversion of the case.

At the hearing, in a small business case, the debtor may seek to
extend the time for confirmation of the plan, pursuant to the
provisions of 11 U.S.C. Section 1121(e).

Parties in interest must submit their written ballot accepting or
rejecting the Plan no later than eight days before the date of the
Confirmation

Objections to confirmation must be filed with the court no later
than seven days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

The Debtor must file a ballot tabulation no later than three days
before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

All creditors and parties in interest that assert a claim against
the Debtor, which arose after the filing of the Chapter 11 case,
including all professionals seeking compensation from the estate of
the Debtor pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 330, must file
motions or applications for the allowance of those claims with the
court no later than fourteen days after the entry of this order.
Applications for payment of administrative expenses will be heard
at same date and time as the Confirmation Hearing if the applicant
has served notice of the hearing on the application (expressly
stating the total amount requested) on all creditors at least 21
days before the hearing.

Three days prior to the Confirmation Hearing, the Debtor must file
a confirmation affidavit which will contain the factual basis upon
which the Debtor relies in establishing that each of the
requirements of Bankruptcy Code Section 1129 are met.

The bankruptcy case is In re: Christopher R. Collins, Case No.
8-15-bk-10581-KRM (Bankr. M.D. Fla.).


CHRISTOPHER MARTIN RIDGEWAY: Sept. 19 Disclosure Statement Hearing
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
held a hearing on the disclosure statement explaining Christopher
Martin Ridgeway's plan on Sept. 6, 2016.

Appearances were made by Robin Cheatham, Esq., counsel for Debtor,
Cherie Nobles, Esq., counsel for Stryker Corporation and Howmedica
Osteonics, Corp., Leann Moses, Esq., counsel for Whitney Bank, and
Mary Langston, Esq., counsel for the United States Trustee.

The Court at the conclusion of the hearing directed the Debtor to
file a redline version of his Amended Disclosure Statement no later
than Sept. 13.  Objections to the Amended Disclosure Statement must
be filed no later than Sept. 15.

A hearing on the approval of the Amended Disclosure Statement will
be held on Sept. 19, at 2:00 p.m.

A confirmation hearing is tentatively set for Oct. 26, at 9:00
a.m.

Christopher Martin Ridgeway filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 16-10643) on March 23, 2016, and is
represented by Robin B. Cheatham, Esq., at Adams & Reese LLP, in
New Orleans, Louisiana.


CHURCH HILL: Seeks Authorization to Use FTB Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------
Church Hill Emergency Medical Services, Inc., asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee for
authorization to use cash collateral.

The Debtor is indebted to First Tennessee Bank in the amount of
$887,573 as of the Petition Date.

The Debtor relates that it has yet to determine if First Tennessee
Bank has an interest in the monies which it seeks the Court's
permission to use.  The Debtor further relates that to the extent
First Tennessee Bank has an interest in such monies, the monies
constitute cash collateral.

The Debtor proposes to grant First Tennessee Bank a security
interest in all of the Debtor's assets in which First Tennessee
Bank held a prepetition lien or secured interest, to the extent of
the priority of First Tennessee Bank's prepetition liens and to the
extent of the Debtor's use of cash collateral following the
Petition Date.

The Debtor wants to use is cash and/or cash generated from the
postpetition collection of its accounts for the month of September
2016, to pay for expenses such as telephone service, in the amount
of $1,286, water in the amount of $180, and electricity in the
amount of $600, among others.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/dt0B4i

First Tennessee Bank is represented by:

          Robert C. Goodrich, Jr., Esq.
          BURR & FOREMAN, LLP
          511 Union Street
          Nashville, TN 37219
          Email: bgoodrich@burr.com


            About Church Hill Emergency Medical Services, Inc.

Church Hill Emergency Medical Services, Inc. filed a chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Case No. 16-51275) on August 30, 2016.
The petition was signed by Mark Johnson, director.  The Debtor is
represented by Mark S. Dessauer, Esq., at Hunter, Smith & Davis.
The case is assigned to Marcia Phillips Parsons.  The Debtor
disclosed total assets at $1.46 million and total debts at $840,000
as of August 25, 2016.



CLEAR CREEK RETIREMENT: U.S. Trustee Forms 5-Member Committee
-------------------------------------------------------------
Gail Brehm Geiger, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 18, on Sept. 6
appointed five creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors of Clear Creek Retirement Plan II LLC.

The committee members are:

     (1) Barbara J. Morrett
         E-mail: Bmorrrett12@gmail.com

     (2) Robert L. Doremus
         Sound Investments
         P.O. Box 2661
         Gig Harbor, WA 98335
         Tel: (253) 307-3725
         Fax: (253) 858-2313
         E-mail: bob@sound-investments.com

     (3) Grant Brooker
         Bennett Truck Transport, LLC
         1001 Industrial Parkway
         McDonough, GA 30253
         Tel: (770) 914-2718
         Fax: (678) 569-1265
         E-mail: grant.brooker@bennettig.com

     (4) George Makari
         E-mail: gmakari@yahoo.com

     (5) Leonard Glaser
         Glaser Family Limited Partnership
         5414 NE 81st Ave, Apt 313T
         Vancouver, WA 98862
         Tel: (360) 896-0100
         Fax: (360) 896-0828
         E-mail: lglaser@ransier.com

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense.  They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs.  Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

                        About Clear Creek

Clear Creek Retirement Plan II LLC sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Washington (Tacoma) (Bankr. W.D. Wash., Case
No. 16-40547) on Feb. 12, 2016.  The petition was signed by Rusty
D. Fields, manager.

The Debtor is represented by John R. Rizzardi, Esq., at Cairncross
& Hempelmann, P.S.  The case is assigned to Judge Brian D. Lynch.

The Debtor disclosed total assets of $9.88 million and total debts
of $8.56 million.


COBALT INTERNATIONAL: Employs Legal and Financial Advisors
----------------------------------------------------------
Cobalt International Energy, Inc., announced that it has retained
Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Lazard Ltd, as financial advisors, and
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Kirkland & Ellis LLP, as legal
advisors, to assist the Company in analyzing and evaluating
potential strategic alternatives and initiatives to improve
liquidity, including the Company's previously announced plans to
sell its Angolan assets, as disclosed in a Form 8-K report with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                         About Cobalt

Cobalt International Energy, Inc. is an independent exploration and
production company with operations currently focused in the
deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico.  In January 2016, the Company
achieved initial production of oil and gas from the Heidelberg
field.  The Company's exploration efforts in the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico have resulted in four oil and gas discoveries including the
North Platte, Shenandoah, Anchor, and Heidelberg fields, each of
which are in various stages of appraisal and development.  The
Company also has a non-operated interest in the Diaba Block
offshore Gabon.

As of June 30, 2016, Cobalt had $3.84 billion in total assets,
$2.64 billion in total liabilities and $1.19 billion in total
stockholders' equity.

The Company reported a net loss of $694.42 million in 2015, a net
loss of $510.76 million in 2014 and a net loss of $589.02 million
in 2013.


COLUCCI TILE: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended to Oct. 10
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Gregory L. Taddonio of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania extended Colucci Tile and Marble,
Inc.'s exclusive period to file a chapter 11 plan and disclosure
statement to October 10, 2016.

The Debtor previously sought the extension of its exclusive period
to file a chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement, contending that
it needed additional time to present a viable Plan of
Reorganization despite having met all operating requirements since
filing for protection under Chapter 11.

             About Colucci Tile and Marble, Inc.

Colucci Tile and Marble, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-21389) on April
12, 2016.  The petition was signed by Carl J. Hilbert, president.
The case is assigned to Judge Gregory L. Taddonio.  At the time of
the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets at $100,000 to
$500,000, and debts at $1 million to $10 million.



COMSTOCK RESOURCES: S&P Lowers Rating on Sr. Secured Notes to 'D'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it lowered its issue-level rating on
exploration and production company Comstock Resources Inc.'s 10%
senior secured notes due 2020 to 'D' from 'B'.  The recovery rating
remains '2' indicating S&P's expectation of substantial (70% to
90%, lower half of the range) recovery in the event of the default.
The issue-level rating on the company's 7.75% and 9.5% senior
unsecured notes due 2019 and 2020 respectively, remains 'D'
(recovery rating: '6').  The corporate credit rating on Comstock
remains 'SD'.  

The downgrade of the 10% senior secured notes follows the Sept. 6,
2016, closing of an exchange offer involving the company's secured
and unsecured notes.  The new senior secured notes will mature in
2020 and bear interest at the rate of 10% per year, if the company
elects to pay in cash, or 12.25% per year if the company elects to
pay interest in kind (PIK).  S&P views the exchange as distressed
as holders of the new notes may receive interest at a later date
than originally promised if the PIK feature is exercised by the
company.

S&P expects to review the corporate credit rating and issue-level
ratings on the new and old debt issues when S&P assess the
likelihood of further debt exchanges as low.  S&P's analysis will
incorporate the company's new capital structure and current
liquidity position, while still taking into account its challenging
operating environment and high leverage.

RATINGS LIST
Comstock Resources Inc.      
Corporate credit rating               SD/--/--

Rating Lowered
Comstock Resources Inc.               To            From
Sr secd 10% notes due 2020           D             B
  Recovery rating                     2L            2L


CONGREGATION ACHPRETVIA: Wants Jan. 11 Plan Exclusivity Extension
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Congregation Achpretvia Tal Chaim Shar Hayushor, Inc. asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to extend
its exclusive periods to file a plan of reorganization and solicit
acceptances to the plan, to January 11, 2017 and March 10, 2017,
respectively.

The Debtor's current Exclusivity Period and Acceptance Period
expire on September 13, 2016 and November 10, 2016, respectively.

The Debtor relates that since the Petition Date, the Debtor has
been focused on defending itself against 163 East 69 Realty and
preserving the Property for the Debtor’s estate and its
creditors.  The Debtor further relates that it removed the State
Court Action to the Bankruptcy Court, to have the Bankruptcy Court
make a determination as to whether the Prepetition Contract is
valid or can be rescinded. In response, 163 East 69 Realty filed a
Motion to Dismiss seeking to dismiss the Debtor’s chapter 11
case, or in the alternative, abstain from hearing the State Court
Action and have it remanded to the Supreme Court.

The Debtor contends that it has determined, together with 163 East
69 Realty, that it was in their best interests to seek a settlement
of the Motion to Dismiss rather than continue with an evidentiary
hearing in front of the Bankruptcy Court. The Debtor further
contends that it had agreed in principle with 163 East 69 Realty to
resolve the Motion to Dismiss by remanding the State Court Action
to the Supreme Court to determine the validity of the Prepetition
Contract or, in the alternative, to seek a determination from the
Attorney General as to whether the Prepetition Contract is valid.
The Debtor adds that its counsel and 163 East 69 Realty's counsel
are still in the process of documenting the settlement and once the
settlement is finalized, the parties will present the settlement to
the Court for approval.

The Debtor tells the Court that upon a determination of the
Prepetition Contract, whether from the Supreme Court or the
Attorney General, the Debtor will then be in a position to
determine its reorganization possibilities.

     About Congregation Achpretvia Tal Chaim Shar Hayushor, Inc.

Congregation Achpretvia Tal Chaim Sharhayu Shor, Inc., in Brooklyn,
New York, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-10092) on Jan. 15, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Harold Friedlander, vice president.  Judge Michael E.
Wiles presides over the case.  Arnold Mitchell Greene, Esq., at
Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck P.C., serves as the
Debtor's counsel.  The Congregation listed total assets of $18
million and total liabilities of $472,502.  



CORNED BEEF EXPRESS: Hires Robinson Brog as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
Corned Beef Express, LLC asks for permission from the Hon. Shelley
C. Chapman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of New York to employ Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese &
Gluck P.C. as counsel, effective July 22, 2016.

The Debtor requires Robinson Brog to:

   (a) provide advice to the Debtor with respect to its powers and

       duties under the Bankruptcy Code in the continued operation

       of its business and the management of its property;

   (b) negotiate with creditors of the Debtor, preparing a plan of

       reorganization and taking the necessary legal steps to
       consummate a plan, including, if necessary, negotiations
       with respect to financing a plan;

   (c) appear before the various taxing authorities to work out a
       plan to pay taxes owing in installments;
  
   (d) prepare on the Debtor's behalf necessary applications,
       motions, answers, replies, discovery requests, forms of
       orders, reports and other pleadings and legal documents;
  
   (e) appear before this Court to protect the interests of the
       Debtor and its estate, and representing the Debtor in all
       matters pending before this Court;
   
   (f) perform all other legal services for the Debtor that may be

       necessary herein; and

   (g) assist the Debtor in connection with all aspects of this
       chapter 11 case.

Robinson Brog will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Shareholders           $450-$665
       Associates             $365-$465
       Paralegals             $175-$300

Robinson Brog will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Robinson Brog will receive its customary fees, subject to the
submission of appropriate applications and the approval of the
Court.  Prior to the Petition Date, Robinson Brog received one
payment from the Debtor totaling $21,717, which included the $1,717
filing fee, of which $4,384.50 was expended in pre-filing
counseling and then in preparing the petitions and other documents
for filing with the Court.  Accordingly, as of the Petition Date,
Robinson Brog holds a retainer of $15,615.50 for the Debtor.

A. Mitchell Greene, shareholder of Robinson Brog, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

Robinson Brog can be reached at:

       A. Mitchell Greene, Esq.
       ROBINSON BROG LEINWAND GREENE   
       GENOVESE & GLUCK P.C.
       875 Third Avenue
       New York, NY 10022
       Tel: (212) 603-6399
       Fax: (212) 956-2164
       E-mail: amg@robinsonbrog.com

Corned Beef Express, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-12096) on July 22, 2016.  The Debtor
is represented by Arnold Mitchell Greene, Esq. of Robinson Brog
Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $100,001 to $500,000 in
assets and $500,001 to $1 million in liabilities.


CORNERSTONE TOWER: Seeks Nov. 9 Plan Exclusivity Extension
----------------------------------------------------------
Cornerstone Tower Service, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Nebraska to extend its exclusive period to file its
Plan and Disclosure Statement to November 9, 2016.

The Debtor relates that its Plan and Disclosure was due on
September 10, 2016.  The Debtor further relates that it is
continuing efforts to resolve claims of various creditors and has
not yet completed those resolutions.

               About Cornerstone Tower Service, Inc.

Headquartered in Grand Island, Nebraska, Cornerstone Tower Service,
Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Neb.
Case No. 16-40787) on May 13, 2016.  The petition was signed by
James Scheer, president.

Judge Thomas L. Saladino presides over the case.  John C. Hahn,
Esq., at Jeffrey, Hahn, Hemmerling & Zimmerman serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtor estimated assets at $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities at $1 billion to $10 billion.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee apppointed IRZ Consulting LLC,
Towerkraft Engineering, P.C., and Paulsen Inc. to serve on the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.



DAVID FAIRWEATHER: U.S. Trustee Directed to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland
issued an order granting the U.S. Trustee's Motion to Direct
Appointment of Chapter 11 Trustee in the Chapter 11 case of David
Fairweather and Jane L. Fairweather.

The bankruptcy case is In re: DAVID FAIRWEATHER, Case No.
14-18615-TJC and JANE L. FAIRWEATHER, Case No. 14-20847-TJC (Bankr.
D. Md.).


DELL TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Assigns 'BB+' CCR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it assigned its 'BB+' corporate credit
rating to Round Rock, Texas-based Dell Technologies Inc. The rating
outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB+' corporate credit on Dell
Inc. and subsequently withdrew the rating at the company's
request.

S&P's rating on Dell reflects S&P's view that the combined Dell and
EMC Corp. entity would be one of the largest technology companies
globally, with leadership positions across the PC, servers,
storage, and virtualization software markets, and improved sales
channels covering small to midsize businesses and large
enterprises.  Offsetting factors include the combined company's
high pro forma adjusted leverage of about 4x; the integration
risks, albeit moderate, that the business combination poses; and
the weaker PC, storage and virtualization software business growth
prospects due to a delayed PC refresh cycle and the enterprise
businesses' ongoing transitioning of their IT infrastructure to
cloud service providers from their private data centers.  The
rating also reflects Dell's commitment to repay debt with proceeds
from noncore asset sales and free operating cash flow (FOCF)
generation, such that pro forma adjusted leverage would decline
from the current 4x level.

The EMC acquisition follows Dell's leveraged buyout (LBO) by its
founder and CEO Michael Dell and Silver Lake Partners in October
2013 for approximately $25 billion.  Dell has been successful in
its deleveraging plan, with leverage of about 2x as of fiscal year
ended Jan. 29, 2016, down from pro forma leverage in the 5x area at
the time of the LBO transaction.

"The stable outlook indicates our expectation that Dell will be
able to successfully integrate its acquisition of EMC, maintain
market leadership in its product categories, and achieved
identified cost savings, leading to leverage declining to the low-
to mid-3x area within 12-18 months," said S&P Global Ratings'
credit analyst David Tsui.

S&P would lower its corporate credit rating on Dell if the
company's business conditions deteriorate significantly or if it
encounters acquisition integration challenges, leading to
materially weaker-than-expected revenue growth and profitability,
and adjusted leverage exceeding 4x.

S&P would raise its rating on Dell by one notch to 'BBB-' if the
company is able to execute its plan of achieving the targeted cost
savings and repay debt, leading to leverage sustained below 3x,
while committing to a financial policy that would preclude it from
taking on incremental debt that would jeopardize its
investment-grade ('BBB-' and above) debt ratings.



DODGE CITY VETERINARY: Wants Nov. 7 Plan Exclusivity Extension
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dodge City Veterinary Hospital, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana to extend its exclusive
periods to file a chapter plan and solicit acceptances to the plan,
to November 7, 2016 and January 6, 2017, respectively.

The Debtor's exclusive period to file a Plan expired on September
8, 2016.  The Debtor's exclusive period to obtain acceptances of
the Plan currently expires on November 7, 2016.

The Debtor tells the Court that Livingston Parish, where the
Debtor's real and personal property necessary to conduct its
business is located, experienced severe flooding.  The Debtor
further tells the Court that its building had considerable
structural damage, and that much of its equipment, furniture and
fixtures was damaged or destroyed.  The Debtor adds that some
business records were lost or misplaced.

The Debtor contends that it was negotiating a sale of substantially
all of its assets to an unrelated third party, and that the
negotiations were suspended due to the flood.  The Debtor further
contends that the sale would allow for a cash payment of
approximately 70% of the total debt at closing.  The Debtor says
that the buyer has expressed that it still wishes to pursue the
sale and is suspending negotiations pending an assessment of the
damage, determination of insurance coverage, and other effects on
the business.

               About Dodge City Veterinary Hospital, Inc.

Headquartered in Denham Springs, Louisiana, filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. M.D. La. Case No. 16-10559) on May
11, 2016.  The petition was signed by Scott F. Smith, president.

Judge Douglas D. Dodd presides over the case.  Michael B. Grissom,
Esq., at B. Michael Grissom, Attorney at Law, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10
million at the time of the filing.



DOMINION STEEL: Hires Waldron & Schneider as General Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Dominion Steel Specialties, Inc. seeks authorization from the Hon.
David R. Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas to employ Waldron & Schneider, LLP as general
counsel.

The Debtor requires Waldron & Schneider to:

   (a) assist the Debtor in the counseling and professional advice

       regarding continued operation of its business and
       management of its property and duties and responsibilities
       as a Debtor;  

   (b) assist the Debtor in preparing on behalf of Debtor all
       necessary applications, notices, answers, adversaries,
       orders, reports and other legal papers;

   (c) assist the Debtor in negotiation of a Plan satisfactory to
       parties in interest, and to prepare a Disclosure Statement
       which will be submitted to parties in interest; and

   (d) assist the Debtor in performing all other legal services
       for Debtor which may be necessary and appropriate.

Waldron & Schneider will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Attorneys                  $185-$300
       Paraprofessionals          $110

Waldron & Schneider will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Kimberly A. Bartley, partner of Waldron & Schneider, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

Waldron & Schneider can be reached at:

       Kimberly A. Bartley, Esq.
       WALDRON & SCHNEIDER, L.L.P.
       15150 Middlebrook Drive
       Houston, TX 77058
       Tel: (281) 488-4438
       Fax: (281) 488-4597
       E-mail: kbartley@ws-law.com

               About Dominion Steel Specialists

Dominion Steel Specialists, Inc. filed a chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case no. 16-34107) on August 18, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Robert R. Comeaux, Jr., president.  The case
is assigned to Judge David R. Jones.  The Debtor is represented by
Kimberly Anne Bartley, Esq., at Waldron & Schneider, L.L.P.  The
Debtor disclosed total assets at $3.39 million and total
liabilities at $3.09 million.



DOMINION STEEL: Names William West as Accountant
------------------------------------------------
Dominion Steel Specialties, Inc. asks for authorization from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to employ
William G. West, P.C., CPA as accountant.

The Debtor requires the accountant to:

   (a) prepare monthly operating reports as required; and

   (b) reconstruct the books and records of the Debtor to the
       extent necessary in order to prepare reports and provide
       accounting advice.

William G. West will be the lead accountant in the case.

The accountant will be paid at these hourly rates:

       William G. West          $300
       Roger D. Martin          $260
       William A. Potter        $230
       Paraprofessionals        $125

The accountant will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

William West assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estate.

The accountant can be reached at:

       William G. West
       WILLIAM G. WEST, P.C., C.P.A.
       12345 Jones Road, Suite 214
       Houston, TX 77070
       Tel: (281) 807-7811

               About Dominion Steel Specialists

Dominion Steel Specialists, Inc. filed a chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case no. 16-34107) on August 18, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Robert R. Comeaux, Jr., president.  The case
is assigned to Judge David R. Jones.  The Debtor is represented by
Kimberly Anne Bartley, Esq., at Waldron & Schneider, L.L.P.  The
Debtor disclosed total assets at $3.39 million and total
liabilities at $3.09 million.


DRM SALES: Online Auction of Assets on Oct. 15 Approved
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Ronald B. King of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Texas authorized DRM Sales & Supply, LLC, and
affiliates to sell personal property at an auction to be conducted
by PPL Group, LLC, on Oct. 15, 2016.

The sale is free and clear of any and all liens.

The Debtor owns various pieces of equipment and machinery it uses
in its business operations.  This equipment and machinery include
front loaders, fork-lifts, welder equipment, pipe racks, and pipe
cat walks.  The Debtor also owns office furniture and equipment
will be included with the auction ("Estate Assets").

The Debtor will also include in the auction any vehicles not
previously sold in accordance with the Debtor's Motion for
Authority to Sell Personal Property of the Estate or turned over to
Community National Bank in accordance with the Global Settlement
and Liquidation Agreement ("Vehicles").

DRM Transportation Services, LLC, an affiliate of the Debtor, will
likewise place trucks, tractors, trailers, and other machinery and
equipment into the auction ("DRM Transportation Assets").

Judge King authorized the Debtor and DRM Transportation Services,
LLC to sell the Estate Assets, Vehicles, and DRM Transportation
Assets through an auction conducted by the PPL Group and in
accordance with the auction agreement.

With respect to any ad valorem taxes for calendar year 2015 and
prior related to the property described in the Debtors' Motion that
have not been objected to prior to or at the time of the sale, such
amount will be paid at or prior to the closing from the sale
proceeds or the Debtors will provide evidence to the Taxing
Authorities relating to resolution of any disputed taxes at a prior
contested judicial or administrative proceeding.  The tax liens for
all tax years including 2016 will attach to the sale proceeds.

With respect to the estimated amount of ad valorem taxes for
calendar year 2016 related to the property described in the
Debtors' Motion, the 2016 estimated ad valorem taxes will be
calculated for escrow purposes by multiplying the tax rate
for the Taxing Authority by the sales price of the personal
property, and such amount will be escrowed ("Tax Escrow") by the
Debtors pending resolution (by agreement, including the consent of
Community National Bank, or Court order) of the amounts owed and of
the priority of the respective Taxing Authorities' liens.  The
amount of the Tax Escrow will not be dispositive of the amount of
the Taxing Authorities' claims, and all rights of the Debtors and
their estates to challenge the amount of such claims are hereby
reserved. In addition, the holders of ad valorem property tax liens
retain all of their state-law rights to enforce the liens that
secure the 2016 taxes and to pursue collection of all amounts owed
pursuant to state law if the 2016 taxes are not timely paid.

The 14 day stay provided by Rule 6004(h) of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure is waived.

                     About DRM Sales & Supply

DRM Sales & Supply, LLC's business consists of buying and
distributing steel casing pipe, tubing, and other such supplies
used in the drilling operations of oil rigs engaged in the
exploration for oil and gas throughout the United States.

DRM Sales & Supply sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
Case No. 16-70028) in Midland, Texas, on Feb. 26, 2016.  David R.
Langston, Esq., at Mullin Hoard & Brown, L.L.P., serves as counsel
to the Debtor.  The Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10
million and debt of $10 million to $50 million.


DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' CCR; Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it revised the rating outlook on DynCorp
International Inc. to stable from positive.  At the same time, S&P
affirmed its ratings, including the 'CCC+' corporate credit rating,
on the company.

The outlook revision reflects S&P's belief that the recent loss of
the INL-Air Wing contract will make it more difficult for DI to
achieve S&P's expectations of revenue and earnings growth over the
next few years, reducing the likelihood of an upgrade.  On
Sept. 1, 2016, the company was notified by the State Dept. that the
new INL-Air Wing contract, which could be worth up to
$10 billion over the up to 11-year contract term, was being awarded
to a competitor, AAR Corp. INL-Air Wing is a major contract for DI
and although the current contract expires in October 2016, the
company is negotiating with the State Dept. for an extension
through October 2017.

"The stable rating outlook reflects the improved liquidity
following the recent refinancing and expectations of fairly stable
revenues and higher margins over the next 12 months," said S&P
Global Ratings credit analyst Christopher Denicolo.  "We expect
credit ratios to remain weak in 2016, with debt to EBITDA of
8.5x-9.5x, but to improve with higher earnings as less profitable
contracts end and are replaced with new business.  However, there
is some uncertainty around our forecast because it depends on new
business wins, which may be difficult in the very competitive
government services market."

S&P could raise the rating if DI is ultimately able to retain the
INL-Air Wing contract, win new business, improve margins, and
reduce debt such that debt to EBITDA declines below 8x and S&P no
longer believes the company's leverage is unsustainable.

S&P could lower the rating if the company is not winning new
business as expected, resulting in liquidity deteriorating
significantly.


EDUARDO MENDOZA: Hires Nelson Robles-Diaz as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Eduardo Mendoza Corporation seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico toe employ Nelson
Robles-Diaz Law Offices, P.S.C. as counsel.

The Debtor requires Robles-Diaz to:

   (a) prosecute the motions and applications filed;

   (b) advise/represent the Debtor with respect to its duties,
       rights and powers;

   (c) advise/represent the Debtor in negotiations with creditors;

   (d) advise/represent the Debtor in analyzing the claims;

   (e) advise/represent the Debtor with respect to its various
       investigations of claims, causes of action and other
       matters;

   (f) advise/represent the Debtor with respect to any
       negotiations and litigation that may be necessary, and at
       hearings and other proceedings;

   (g) advise/represent the Debtor with respect to pleadings and
       applications as may be necessary in furtherance of the
       Debtor's interests and objectives; and

   (h) advise/representing the Debtor with respect to such other
       matters as may be required and are deemed to be in the
       interests of the Debtor in accordance with the applicable
       law.

Robles-Diaz will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Nelson Robles-Diaz           $250
       Paralegals and Law Clerks    $40-$50

Robles-Diaz will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

The Debtor and Robles-Diaz agreed on a $12,000 retainer.

Nelson Robles-Diaz assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estate.

Nelson Robles-Diaz can be reached at:

       Nelson Diaz Robles, Esq.
       NELSON ROBLES-DIAZ LAW OFFICES PSC
       P.O. Box 192302
       San Juan, PR 00912        
       Tel: (787) 294-9518
       Fax: (787) 294-9519
       E-mail: nroblesdiaz@gmail.com

Eduardo Mendoza Corporation, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-06672) on August 22, 2016, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Nelson Robles Diaz, Esq.


EMR ELECTRIC: Asks for Sept. 27 Plan Filing Period Extension
------------------------------------------------------------
EMR Electric Motor Rewind, L.P. and EMR Holdings, L.L.P. ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to extend
their exclusive periods to file a chapter 11 plan and solicit
acceptances to the plan, to September 27, 2016 and December 31,
2016, respectively.

The Debtors' current exclusive filing period was slated to expire
on September 8, 2016.  Their current exclusive solicitation period
is set to expire on November 7, 2016.

The Debtors relate that prior to the Petition Date and throughout
their cases, they have diligently evaluated, in consultation with
their professionals, a number of options to address their financial
issues.  The Debtors further relate that these efforts included
engaging in discussions regarding restructuring the Debtors'
businesses and balance sheet.  The Debtors believe that they can
become a profitable enterprise and propose a feasible, confirmable
plan of reorganization.

The Debtors tell the Court that they need additional time to
finalize their plan of reorganization.  The Debtors further tell
the Court that they have consulted with New Century Financial,
their largest alleged creditor, and New Centurty Financial does not
oppose the requested extension.

               About EMR Electric Motor Rewind, L.P.

Headquartered in Corpus Christi, Texas, EMR Electric Motor Rewind,
L.P., is a manufacturing and equipment repair company.  EMR
Holdings, L.L.P., owns 99% of EMR Electric Motor Rewind, L.P.

EMR Electric Motor Rewind, L.P. -- fdba Electric Motor Rewind, LP,
EMR Electrical Group, Inc., fdba Electric Motor Rewind, Inc., fdba
EMR Energy Services Management, Inc., fdba EMR Energy Services,
L.P. -- filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Case No. 16-20184) on May 11, 2016.  At the time of the
filing, EMR Electric Motor estimated both assets and liabilities in
the range of $1 million to $10 million.  EMR Holdings estimated
assets of $0 to $50,000 and debts of $1 million to $10 million.

The Chapter 11 petitions were signed by Raymond Lopez, authorized
representative.  Judge Marvin Isgur presides over the case.
William B Kingman, Esq., at the Law Offices of William B. Kingman,
PC, serves as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.



ENERGY FUTURE: Computershare Says Outline Vague on Make-Whole Term
------------------------------------------------------------------
Computershare Trust Company, N.A., and Computershare Trust Company
of Canada, in its capacity as indenture trustee for the EFIH Second
Lien notes issued by Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC
and EFIH Finance Inc. pursuant to the Indenture dated as of April
25, 2011, on Sept. 7, 2016, filed an objection to the Disclosure
Statement explaining the Disclosure Statement for Energy Future
Holdings Corp.'s Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization.

The EFIH Second Lien Trustee and the ad hoc group of EFIH Second
Lien Noteholders tell the Court that they have been working
constructively with the Debtors and NextEra on the terms of a
settlement that would enable the EFIH Second Lien Noteholders to
support a modified Plan. Those negotiations continue in earnest,
and while the EFIH Second Lien Trustee and the ad hoc group of EFIH
Second Lien Noteholders are hopeful that a final resolution can be
reached, the parties have not yet executed definitive
documentation.  As a result, the EFIH Second Lien Trustee is
constrained to file this objection to the current version of the
Disclosure Statement on file.

As currently drafted, Computershare continues, the Disclosure
Statement contains numerous ambiguous provisions and fails to
provide adequate information regarding the specifics of the
treatment of the EFIH Second Lien Notes (who are impaired under the
Plan) and the ability of the EFIH Second Lien Trustee and the EFIH
Second Lien Noteholders to collect on their Allowed EIFH Second
Lien Note Claims. Absent additional disclosure on each of these
points, the Disclosure Statement currently cannot be approved.

Under the terms of the Plan, the EFIH Second Lien Notes are deemed
impaired under the Plan and are entitled to vote.  Pursuant to
section 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code, a claim is impaired if it
alters the "legal, equitable, and contractual rights to which such
claim or interest entitles the holder." The Disclosure Statement,
however, fails to provide any information as to how the EFIH Second
Lien Notes are impaired under the Plan or the effect of the
impairment and the means of collection on allowed EFIH Second Lien
Note Claims.

Computershare relates that through discussions with the Debtors,
the EFIH Second Lien Trustee understands that the "impairment"
arises because the liens securing the EFIH Second Lien Notes will
be released on the Effective Date and the notes will be cancelled.
The Debtors provide no legal basis for doing so without the consent
of the EFIH Second Lien Noteholders, and it is not clear how the
Debtors will be able to "cram-down" a rejecting class of EFIH
Second Lien Noteholders while still releasing their liens. To
provide holders of EFIH Second Lien Note Claims with the requisite
adequate information to vote on the Plan, the Disclosure Statement
should clearly explain that the Debtors intend to release the EFIH
Second Lien Noteholders liens on the Effective Date -- as well as
any other legal, contractual, or equitable rights being impacted
under the Plan.

Computershare contends the Disclosure Statement should also
identify the effect of any such impairment -- including how the
release of liens and cancellation of the EFIH Second Lien Notes
impacts the EFIH Second Lien Trustee's ability to prosecute the
pending appeal of the Makewhole Claim, defend the appeal in the
Intercreditor Litigation and manage any distributions it may need
to hold back on account of the Intercreditor Litigation.

Matt Chiappardi, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reported that
several EFH noteholders contend that the language in the Disclosure
Statement could undermine their appeal of nearly $1 billion in
make-whole claims the bankruptcy court has rejected.  

Computershare explained that the current Plan stripped the
important language in the Original Confirmed Plan -- which was
negotiated between the Debtors and the EFIH Second Lien Indenture
Trustee -- that clarified that the EFIH Second Lien Notes and the
EFIH Second Lien Indenture would remain in full force and effect
post-Effective Date to pursue the Makewhole Claim and any other
claims with respect to the pending litigation and appeals.
Instead, the current Plan only provides that the cancellation of
notes will not impact the ability of indenture trustees to appear
in the Chapter 11 Cases or any proceeding in which they are a
party, provided this provision does not affect the discharge of
claim or result in any expense or liability to the Debtors.   To
the extent the Debtors intend, through the Plan, to abrogate the
EFIH Second Lien Trustee's rights in the pending Intercreditor
Litigation, the appeal of the Makewhole Claim, or any other claims
or rights arising under the Indenture, this information needs to be
directly and explicitly disclosed.

Under the Plan, the Reorganized Debtors have agreed to assume
liability for payment of the EFIH Second Lien Note Makewhole Claims
if those claims are allowed after the Effective Date.
Computershare contends that several provisions in the Plan and the
proposed Ballots, however, eliminated key language from the
Original Confirmed Plan and therefore could be read to undermine
the EFIH Second Lien Trustee's appellate rights to continue to
pursue the Makewhole Claim and collect on the Makewhole Claim if
allowed after the Effective Date.

Computershare enumerates those provisions:

     -- The injunction provision of the Plan, which enjoins the
pursuit of any claims that are released or discharged under the
Plan, without including the clarifying language from the Original
Confirmed Plan that carved out the EFIH Second Lien Notes Trustee's
pursuit of the appeal of the Makewhole Claims.  See Original
Confirmed Plan Sec. VIII.F ("The Plan shall not enjoin or otherwise
prevent . . . the EFIH Second Lien Notes Trustee from prosecuting
any appeal of any order with respect to any Makewhole Claims or any
other Claims held by such parties.").

     -- The release language in the Ballots, which provides that
holders who "(A) vote to accept the Plan, (B) fail to submit a
ballot by the EFH/EFIH Voting Deadline, or (C) submit the ballot
but abstain from voting to accept or release the Plan without
checking the [appropriate] box" will be deemed to consent to the
releases set forth in Article VIII.D of the Plan, potentially
causing holders of EFIH Second Lien Note Claims to inadvertently
release their Makewhole Claims and any other
claims.

     -- The release of the liens and the cancellation of the EFIH
Second Lien Notes, both of which, as discussed above, need to
remain in place to ensure that the holders of the EFIH Second Lien
Note Claims can collect on the Makewhole Claims when allowed, or
some other means must be provided for their payment.

     -- The provisions regarding the treatment of any EFIH Second
Lien Claims that are allowed as unsecured claims, which directly
conflict with the allowance and payment of the EFIH Second Lien
Makewhole Claim when ultimately allowed.

While Class B6 Claims (General Unsecured Claims against the EFIH
Debtors) arguably include any unsecured EFIH Second Lien Makewhole
Claim, the allowance of Class B6 Claims derived from the EFIH
Second Lien Notes actually excludes any Makewhole Claims,
Computershare says.

"Each of these conflicting provisions must be reconciled for
holders of EFIH Second Lien Note Claims to properly vote on the
Plan. And the extent the Debtors are trying to impede the EFIH
Second Lien Trustee's right to pursue the appeal and collect on any
allowed Makewhole Claim, this is directly relevant to how holders
of EFIH Second Lien Note Claims will vote, and must be prominently
disclosed in the Disclosure Statement," Computershare tells the
Court.

The Plan and the Disclosure Statement must also explain when the
Makewhole Claim would be paid, if allowed after the Effective Date.
Presumably, it should be paid promptly after its allowance, but
there is no reason for any ambiguity, Computershare added.

Computershare is represented in the case by:

     Laura Davis Jones, Esq.
     Robert J. Feinstein, Esq.
     PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
     919 N. Market Street, 17th Floor
     P.O. Box 8705
     Wilmington, DE 19899-8705
     Telephone: (302) 652-4100
     Facsimile: (302) 652-4400
     E-mail: ljones@ pszjlaw.com
            rfeinstein@ pszjlaw.com

          - and -

     Thomas Moers Mayer, Esq.
     Gregory A. Horowitz, Esq.
     Joshua K. Brody, Esq.
     KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
     1177 Avenue of the Americas
     New York, NY 10036
     Telephone: (212) 715-9100
     Facsimile: (212) 715-8000
     E-mail: tmayer@kramerlevin.com
             ghorowitz@kramerlevin.com
             jbrody@kramerlevin.com

          - and -

     Stephanie Wickouski, Esq.
     BRYAN CAVE LLP
     1290 Avenue of the Americas
     New York, New York 10104-3300
     Telephone: 212-541-1114
     Facsimile: 212-904-0514
     E-mail: stephanie.wickouski@bryancave.com

In August 2016, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Amended Plan of
Reorganization for Texas Competitive Energy Holdings (TCEH).  That
Plan contemplates a tax-free spin of the company's competitive
businesses, known as TCEH and including Luminant and TXU Energy,
along with supporting business services.  

The Court is scheduled to consider the Plan for EFH and Energy
Future Intermediate Holdings, which owns an indirect 80% interest
in Oncor, on Dec. 1, 2016.

                      About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a Portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.

Oncor, an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the
largest regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth. EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS). The Debtors are seeking to have their cases jointly
administered for procedural purposes.

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion. The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal. The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,
and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement
are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as legal
advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor. The EFH
equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for
the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is represented by
Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.  An Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in the case. The Committee
represents the interests of the unsecured creditors of only of
Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC; EFCH's direct
subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC; and
EFH Corporate Services Company, and of no other debtors. The
Committee has selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and Polsinelli PC
for representation in this high-profile energy restructuring. The
lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck, Esq., Brett H.
Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at Morrison & Foerster
LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K. Edelson, Esq.,
Shanti
M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at Polsinelli PC.

                          *     *     *

In December 2015, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Debtors'
Sixth
Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization.  In May 2016, certain first
lien creditors of TCEH delivered a Plan Support Termination Notice
to the Debtors and the other parties to the Plan Support
Agreement,
notifying the parties of the occurrence of a Plan Support
Termination Event. The delivery of the Plan Support Termination
Notice caused the Confirmed Plan to become null and void.

Following the occurrence of the Plan Support Termination Event as
well as the termination of a roughly $20 billion deal to sell the
Debtors' stake in Oncor Electric Delivery Co., the Debtors filed
the Plan of Reorganization and the Disclosure Statement with the
Bankruptcy Court on May 1, 2016. On May 11, they filed an amended
joint plan of reorganization and a related disclosure statement.

In June 2016, Judge Sontchi approved the disclosure statement
explaining Energy Future Holdings Corp., et al.'s second amended
joint plan of reorganization of the TCEH Debtors and the EFH
Shared
Services Debtors.

On Aug. 27, 2016, Judge Sontchi confirmed the Chapter 11 exit
plans
of two of Energy Future Holdings Corp.'s subsidiaries, power
generator Luminant and retail electricity provider TXU Energy Inc.


ENERGY FUTURE: Plan Outline Fuzzy on Make-Whole Claims, DTC Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Delaware Trust Company, as indenture and collateral trustee for the
first-lien notes issued by Energy Future Intermediate Holding
Company LLC and EFIH Finance Inc. objects to the proposed
Disclosure Statement for the Debtors' Third Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization As It Applies to the EFH Debtors and EFIH Debtors.

Delaware Trust tells the Court that the Disclosure Statement is
simply inaccurate, stating in some places, for example, that the
claims of the Trustee and the Noteholders are unimpaired, when in
fact the Plan now provides that those claims are impaired.  The
Disclosure Statement also does not adequately disclose how the
claims of the Trustee and Noteholders will be treated in several
other respects, such as whether the holders of those claims will
retain their liens after the Plan's
effective date; whether any make-whole claims that may be allowed
on appeal as unsecured claims will be allowed under the Plan;
whether the Plan purports to impair the
rights of the Trustee and the Noteholders with respect to the
claims-allowance process, the pending appeals they are pursuing, or
their subordination agreements with other creditors; and when and
how any claims that are allowed will be paid.  Finally, the
Disclosure Statement discloses the Debtors' position on various
issues, e.g., asserting that the Plan satisfies the requirements
for confirmation and reserving the Debtors' rights to seek to
dismiss the Trustee's pending make-whole appeal as "equitably moot"
if the Plan is confirmed and goes effective, but -- unlike the
disclosure statement for the prior, confirmed plan -- does not
adequately inform creditors and parties in interest of the
Trustee's position on those issues, or of how the Plan could affect
them if the Trustee and the Noteholders prevail in the make-whole
appeal.

Delaware Trust explains that, to the extent the make-whole and/or
other EFIH First Lien Note Claims are ultimately allowed,
Reorganized EFIH may have to satisfy liabilities of several hundred
million dollars to the Trustee and the Noteholders.  If the
make-whole claims of the Trustee and the Noteholders are allowed
on appeal after the EFH Effective Date, Reorganized EFIH would be
obligated under the Plan to pay those claims in full in cash—an
amount that could exceed $550 million, including interest.  That
could affect and/or reduce the value of the Plan Sponsor NextEra's
investment in Reorganized EFH and Reorganized EFIH.

According to Delaware Trust, while most of the consideration under
the Plan to be paid to EFIH and EFH creditors is in the form of
cash, and the Plan is clear that these distributions will not be
reduced if the Trustee's and the Noteholders' make-whole claims are
allowed on appeal, some of the consideration may also be in the
form of stock in NextEra. The value of that stock could be reduced
if the make-whole claims of the Trustee and the Noteholders are
allowed on appeal.  Accordingly, the Disclosure Statement should
adequately disclose these potential consequences of the Plan.

Delaware Trust also objects to certain of the related relief
requested in the Debtors' motion seeking approval of the Disclosure
Statement and other relief.  Delaware Trust points out that
although the Plan provides that the Trustee and Noteholders are not
"Releasing Parties" under the Plan's non-debtor release provisions,
the form of ballots the Debtors ask the Court to approve in the
Proposed Order include provisions that purport to transform the
Trustee and Noteholders into "Releasing Parties" unless they
affirmatively opt out of the releases.  The Proposed Order would
set a voting record date that is not consistent with the Federal
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.  The solicitation procedures the
Debtors ask the Court to approve would allow the claims of the
Trustee and Noteholders in the amount of only $1.00 for voting
purposes, which is impermissible under the Bankruptcy Code and
Rules and at the very least misleading. Those provisions should
likewise be corrected.

Counsel for Delaware Trust Company as trustee:

          Norman L. Pernick, Esq.
          J. Kate Stickles, Esq.
          COLE SCHOTZ P.C.
          500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1410
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: 302-652-3131
          Facsimile: 302-652-3117
          E-mail: npernick@coleschotz.com
                  kstickles@coleschotz.com

               - and -

          Warren A. Usatine, Esq.
          COLE SCHOTZ P.C.
          Court Plaza North
          25 Main Street
          Hackensack, NJ 07602
          Telephone: 201-489-3000
          Facsimile: 201-489-1536
          E-mail: wusatine@coleschotz.com

               - and -

          Philip D. Anker, Esq.
          WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
          7 World Trade Center
          250 Greenwich Street
          New York, NY 10007
          Telephone: 212-230-8800
          Facsimile: 212-230-8888
          E-mail: Philip.Anker@wilmerhale.com

               - and -

          Keith H. Wofford, Esq.
          Mark Somerstein, Esq.
          ROPES & GRAY LLP
          1211 Avenue of the Americas
          New York, NY 10036-8704
          Telephone: 212-596-9000
          Facsimile: 212-596-9090
          E-mail: Keith.Wofford@ropesgray.com
                  Mark.Somerstein@ropesgray.com

               - and -

          D. Ross Martin, Esq.
          Andrew Devore, Esq.
          ROPES & GRAY LLP
          800 Boylston Street, Prudential Tower
          Boston, MA 02199-3600
          Telephone: 617-951-7000
          Facsimile: 617-951-7050
          E-mail: Ross.Martin@ropesgray.com
                  Andrew.Devore@ropesgray.com

               - and -

          James H. Millar, Esq.
          DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
          1177 Avenue of the Americas, 41st Floor
          New York, NY 10036-2714
          Telephone: 212-248-3264
          Facsimile: 212-248-3141
          E-mail: James.Millar@dbr.com

              - and -

          Todd C. Schiltz, Esq.
          DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
          222 Delaware Ave, Suite 1410
          Wilmington, DE 19801-1612
          Telephone: 302-467-4200
          Facsimile: 302-467-4201
          E-mail: Todd.Schiltz@dbr.com

In August 2016, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Amended Plan of
Reorganization for Texas Competitive Energy Holdings (TCEH).  That
Plan contemplates a tax-free spin of the company's competitive
businesses, known as TCEH and including Luminant and TXU Energy,
along with supporting business services.  

The Court is scheduled to consider the Plan for EFH and Energy
Future Intermediate Holdings, which owns an indirect 80% interest
in Oncor, on Dec. 1, 2016.

                      About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a Portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.

Oncor, an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the
largest regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth. EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS). The Debtors are seeking to have their cases jointly
administered for procedural purposes.

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion. The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal. The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,
and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement
are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as legal
advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor. The EFH
equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for
the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is represented by
Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.  An Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in the case. The Committee
represents the interests of the unsecured creditors of only of
Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC; EFCH's direct
subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC; and
EFH Corporate Services Company, and of no other debtors. The
Committee has selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and Polsinelli PC
for representation in this high-profile energy restructuring. The
lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck, Esq., Brett H.
Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at Morrison & Foerster
LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K. Edelson, Esq.,
Shanti
M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at Polsinelli PC.

                          *     *     *

In December 2015, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Debtors'
Sixth
Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization.  In May 2016, certain first
lien creditors of TCEH delivered a Plan Support Termination Notice
to the Debtors and the other parties to the Plan Support
Agreement,
notifying the parties of the occurrence of a Plan Support
Termination Event. The delivery of the Plan Support Termination
Notice caused the Confirmed Plan to become null and void.

Following the occurrence of the Plan Support Termination Event as
well as the termination of a roughly $20 billion deal to sell the
Debtors' stake in Oncor Electric Delivery Co., the Debtors filed
the Plan of Reorganization and the Disclosure Statement with the
Bankruptcy Court on May 1, 2016. On May 11, they filed an amended
joint plan of reorganization and a related disclosure statement.

In June 2016, Judge Sontchi approved the disclosure statement
explaining Energy Future Holdings Corp., et al.'s second amended
joint plan of reorganization of the TCEH Debtors and the EFH
Shared
Services Debtors.

On Aug. 27, 2016, Judge Sontchi confirmed the Chapter 11 exit
plans
of two of Energy Future Holdings Corp.'s subsidiaries, power
generator Luminant and retail electricity provider TXU Energy Inc.


ENERGY FUTURE: Selling 36-Acre North Main Property for $2.77M
-------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Future Holdings Corp. and affiliates filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a notice indicating
that debtor Luminant Generation Co., LLC is selling approximately
36 acres in Tarrant County, Texas ("North Main Property") to
Tarrant Regional Water District for $2,765,516.

Pursuant to the June 30, 2016 order approving the sale of de
minimis assets, any recipient of the notice may object to the
proposed sale within 10 calendar days of service of the notice.
Objections must be submitted to counsel for the Debtors, Kirkland &
Ellis, LLP.

A copy of the Notice is available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/Energy_Future_9474_Sales.pdf

                      About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a Portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.

Oncor, an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the
largest regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth. EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS). The Debtors are seeking to have their cases jointly
administered for procedural purposes.

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion. The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal. The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,
and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement
are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as legal
advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor. The EFH
equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for
the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is represented by
Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.  An Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in the case. The Committee
represents the interests of the unsecured creditors of only of
Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC; EFCH's direct
subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC; and
EFH Corporate Services Company, and of no other debtors. The
Committee has selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and Polsinelli PC
for representation in this high-profile energy restructuring. The
lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck, Esq., Brett H.
Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at Morrison & Foerster
LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K. Edelson, Esq.,
Shanti
M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at Polsinelli PC.

                          *     *     *

In December 2015, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Debtors'
Sixth
Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization.  In May 2016, certain first
lien creditors of TCEH delivered a Plan Support Termination Notice
to the Debtors and the other parties to the Plan Support
Agreement,
notifying the parties of the occurrence of a Plan Support
Termination Event. The delivery of the Plan Support Termination
Notice caused the Confirmed Plan to become null and void.

Following the occurrence of the Plan Support Termination Event as
well as the termination of a roughly $20 billion deal to sell the
Debtors' stake in Oncor Electric Delivery Co., the Debtors filed
the Plan of Reorganization and the Disclosure Statement with the
Bankruptcy Court on May 1, 2016. On May 11, they filed an amended
joint plan of reorganization and a related disclosure statement.

In June 2016, Judge Sontchi approved the disclosure statement
explaining Energy Future Holdings Corp., et al.'s second amended
joint plan of reorganization of the TCEH Debtors and the EFH
Shared
Services Debtors.

On Aug. 27, 2016, Judge Sontchi confirmed the Chapter 11 exit
plans
of two of Energy Future Holdings Corp.'s subsidiaries, power
generator Luminant and retail electricity provider TXU Energy Inc.


ESTEPHAN G SARKIS: Unsecureds Likely To Recoup 100% Under Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Estephan G. Sarkis filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California a combined plan of reorganization
and disclosure statement dated Aug. 17, 2016.

Under the Plan, general unsecured creditors will get a pro rata
portion of up to $60,000, likely to result in a 100% recovery of
allowed claims, in quarterly payments over five years.

Class 2(a) General Unsecured Claims represent deficiency claims for
sold out junior lienholders after properties were foreclosed.  An
objection to each claim was filed and served on the claimants.
Bosco Credit LLC withdrew it's proof of claim; Real Time
Resolutions failed to oppose the claim objection an order
sustaining the Objection has been entered.

Holders of allowed claims of general unsecured creditors (including
allowed claims of creditors whose executory contracts or unexpired
leases are being rejected under the Plan) will receive a pro rata
share of a fund totaling $60,000, created by the Debtor's payment
of $3,000 per quarter for a period of up to 20 quarters, starting
Oct. 1, 2016.  Pro rata means the entire amount of the fund divided
by the entire amount owed to creditors with allowed claims in this
class.

Creditors in Class 2(a) may not take any collection action against
the Debtor so long as the Debtor is not in material default under
the Plan.  This class is impaired and is entitled to vote on
confirmation of the Plan.  The Debtor has indicated above whether a
particular claim is disputed.

If the Plan is confirmed, the payments promised in the Plan
constitute new contractual obligations that replace the Debtor's
pre-confirmation debts.  Creditors may not seize their collateral
or enforce their pre-confirmation debts so long as Debtor performs
all obligations under the Plan.  If the Debtor defaults in
performing Plan obligations, any creditor can file a motion to have
the case dismissed or converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation, or
enforce their non-bankruptcy rights.  The Debtor will be discharged
from all pre-confirmation debts (with certain exceptions) if Debtor
makes all Plan payments.  

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb15-43733-82.pdf

The Plan was filed by the Debtor's counsel:

     Ruth Elin Auerbach, Esq.
     Law Office of Ruth Auerbach
     77 Van Ness Ave Suite 201
     San Francisco, CA 94102
     E-mail: attorneyruth@sbcglobal.net

Estephan G Sarkis filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 15-31412) on Nov. 12, 2015.


ESTEPHAN SARKIS: Ch. 11 Plan Proposes $60K Payment to Unsecureds
----------------------------------------------------------------
Property manager Estephan G. Sarkis filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of California a combined plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement, which propose a pro-rata
payment of up to $60,000 to general unsecured creditors in
quarterly payments over five years.

According to the Debtor, the payment to general unsecured creditors
will likely result in a 100% recovery of allowed claims.  The
Franchise Tax Board, a general unsecured creditor holding a
$10,810.29 claim, will receive 100% of its claim in quarterly
installments of $3,000 until the claim, with interest at the
Federal rate from the effective date of the plan, has been paid in
full.

The Chapter 11 case was filed to stop the foreclosure proceedings
started by Trojan Capital.  The Debtor had two loans against his
property at 3391 Jordan, in Oakland, California, with Citibank, the
predecessor-in-interest of Trojan.

A full-text copy of the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement
dated Sept. 6, 2016, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/15-43733-94.pdf

Estephan G Sarkis filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Cal.
Case No. 15-31412) on November 12, 2015.

The Debtor is represented by:

     Ruth Elin Auerbach
     Law office of Ruth Auerbach
     77 Van Ness Ave., Suite 201
     San Francisco, CA 94102


FINTON CONSTRUCTION: Can Use Cash Collateral Through Sept. 28
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Laurel M. Isicoff of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida authorized Finton Construction, Inc.
to use cash collateral through Sept. 28, 2016.

The Debtor was authorized to use cash collateral in accordance with
the approved Budget, which covered the months of August 2016 to
December 2016.  The Budget provided for total operating expenses in
the amount of $114,305 for the month of September 2016.

A full-text copy of the Order dated Sept. 2, 2016, is available at
https://is.gd/3rUjDU

                  About Finton Construction

Finton Construction, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 16-19221) on June
30, 2016.  The petition was signed by John Finton, president.
  
The case is assigned to Judge Laurel M. Isicoff.  The Debtor is
represented by David L. Merrill, Esq., at Merrill PA.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets at $0 to
$50,000 and debt at $1 million to $10 million.


FLINTKOTE COMPANY: 3rd Circuit Won't Rehear Ruling Frederick Case
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martin O'Sullivan, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reported the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said it would not rehear its
decision to uphold a lower court's ruling that Flintkote Co. is
shielded from owing damages for alleged property contamination to a
small business.   8 E. Frederick Place LLC was seeking to sue
Flintkote over pollution to a roughly 6-acre parcel of land in New
Jersey that Flintkote used to operate a rubber manufacturing
facility from 1945 to 1972 and that Frederick has owned since 1984.


As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on July 20, 2015,
Delaware District Judge Leonard P. Stark tossed out the request of
8 E. Frederick Place, LLC, asking the District Court to reconsider
its Memorandum and Order issued on January 16, 2015, related to
the
bankruptcy proceedings of The Flintkote Company and Flintkote
Mines
Limited.

Frederick Place filed a claim against the Debtors' bankruptcy
estate, alleging that the Debtors are liable for polluting
property
it currently owns in Cedar Knolls, New Jersey.  The Debtors
previously owned that property and used it as a site for a rubber
manufacturing facility.

Frederick Place on May 23, 2011, filed a Motion for Relief from
Stay, seeking to pursue various federal and state environmental
claims against the Debtors in New Jersey state court.  On June 6,
2012, the Bankruptcy Court granted two motions for summary
judgment
filed by the Debtors and denied Frederick Place's Motion for
Relief
from Stay.

The District Court entered a Memorandum on January 16, 2015,
affirming the Bankruptcy Court Order.  Frederick Place presented
its Motion for Reconsideration on February 13, 2015.

Frederick Place argued that the Court should reconsider its
Memorandum, and reverse the Bankruptcy Court's Order, because (1)
the New Jersey Supreme Court recently issued Morristown Assocs. v.
Grant Oil Co., 106 A.3d 1176 (N.J. 2015), which provides further
guidance on the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (the
"Spill Act"); (2) the Court applied an incorrect standard of
review
to the Bankruptcy Court's Order; and (3) the Court failed to take
into consideration the public policy of the state of New Jersey.

The Debtors argued that Morristown provides no new analysis
regarding the Spill Act that affects this Court's reasoning in the
Memorandum.  The Debtors also maintained that the Court's
Memorandum plainly applied the correct de novo standard of review.

They said that Frederick Place's remaining arguments improperly
rehash points of law that the District Court already decided.

According to Judge Stark, Frederick Place has not demonstrated an
intervening change in the controlling law, the discovery of new
evidence that was not previously available, or the need to correct
a clear error of law or fact or to prevent manifest injustice.

A copy of the District Court's July 14, 2015 Memorandum Order is
available at http://bit.ly/1RCHB9Kfrom  Leagle.com.

8 E. Frederick Place LLC is represented by Learon John Nelson
Bird,
Esq., at Fox Rothschild LLP.

                   About The Flintkote Company

Headquartered in San Francisco, California, The Flintkote Company
is engaged in the business of manufacturing, processing and
distributing building materials.  Flintkote Mines Limited is a
subsidiary of Flintkote Company and is engaged in the mining of
base-precious metals.  The Flintkote Company filed for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 04-11300) on April 30, 2004.
Flintkote Mines Limited filed for Chapter 11 relief (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 04-12440) on Aug. 25, 2004.  Kevin T. Lantry, Esq.,
Jeffrey E. Bjork, Esq., Dennis M. Twomey, Esq., Jeremy E.
Rosenthal, Esq., and Christina M. Craige, Esq., at Sidley Austin,
LLP, in Los Angeles; James E. O'Neill, Esq., and Laura Davis
Jones, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, in Wilmington,
Del., represent the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.

Elihu Inselbuch, Esq., at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, in New
York, N.Y.; Peter Van N. Lockwood, Esq., Ronald E. Reinsel, Esq.,
at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, in Washington, D.C.; and Philip
E. Milch, Esq., at Campbell & Levine, LLC, in Wilmington, Del.,
represent the Asbestos Claimants Committee as counsel.

James J. McMonagle, is the legal representative for future
claimants.  The FCR has retained Dr. Timothy Wyant as claims
evaluation consultant.  The FCR is represented by James L. Patton,
Jr., Esq., and Edwin J. Harron, Esq., at Young Conaway Stargatt &
Taylor, LLP; and Reginald W. Jackson, Esq., at Vorys, Sater,
Seymour & Pease LLP.

When Flintkote filed for protection from its creditors, it
estimated more than $100 million each in assets and debts.  When
Flintkote Mines Limited filed for protection from its creditors,
it estimated assets of $1 million to $50 million, and debts of
more than $100 million.

The Debtors' Chapter 11 cases were re-assigned to Judge Mary F.
Walrath in line with the retirement of former Bankruptcy Judge
Judith Fitzgerald.


FLORIDA GLASS: Names Leon Williamson as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------
Florida Glass of Tampa Bay, Inc. seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to employ Leon
A. Williamson, Jr. of the law firm of Law Office of Leon A.
Williamson, Jr., P.A. as counsel, nunc pro tunc to May 12, 2016.

The Debtor requires Mr. Williamson to:

   (a) take all action necessary to protect and preserve the
       estate of the Debtor including the prosecution of actions
       on its behalf, and objecting to claims filed against the
       Estate, if appropriate;

   (b) prepare, on behalf of the Debtor, applications, answers,
       orders, reports and papers, required in connection with the

       administration of the Estate;

   (c) counsel the Debtor with regard to its rights and
       obligations as Debtor in Possession;

   (d) prepare and file schedules of assets and liability;

   (e) prepare and file a Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure
       Statement; and

   (f) perform all other necessary legal services in connection
       with this Chapter 11 case.   

Mr. Williamson will be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Mr. Williamson assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estate.

Mr. Williamson can be reached at:

       Leon A. Williamson, Jr., Esq.
       LAW OFFICE OF LEON A. WILLIAMSON, JR., P.A.
       306 S. Plant Avenue, Ste. B
       Tampa, FL 33606
       Tel: 813-253-3109
       Fax: 813-253-3215
       E-mail: leon@lwilliamsonlaw.com

               Florida Glass of Tampa Bay, Inc.

Florida Glass of Tampa Bay, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-06874), on August 9, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Joseph Muraco, president.

The Debtor's counsel is Leon A. Williamson, Jr., Esq. at the Law
Office of Leon A. Williamson, Jr., P.A., of Tampa, Florida.

At the time of filing, the Debtor had $1 million to $10 million in
estimated assets and $10 million to $50 million in estimated
liabilities. A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured
creditors is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb16-06874.pdf


FOUR DIA: Wants to Use CapitalSpring Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------
Four Dia, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas for authorization to use cash collateral.

The Debtor relates that only CapitalSpring SBLC, LLC, could assert
a security interest in its accounts and all proceeds arising from
the collection thereof.  The Debtor is indebted to CapitalSpring in
the amount of $5,044,143.

The Debtor contends that without the use of the cash collateral, it
would be unable to pay its operating expenses, which, in turn,
would force it to cease operating.  The Debtor further contends
that its business and its assets are far more valuable as a going
concern than they would be if the Debtor was forced to cease
operations.

The Debtor's projected Budget for the period Sept. 1, 2016 to Sept.
30, 2016 provides for total expenses in the amount of $77,846.

The Debtor proposes to grant CapitalSpring with a replacement lien
in Accounts and cash collateral generated post-petition.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 4, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/VFVeRT

Four Dia, Inc., is represented by:

          Russell W. Mills, Esq.
          HIERSCHE, HAYWARD, DRAKELEY & URBACH, P.C.
          15305 Dallas Parkway, Suite 700
          Addison, TX 75001
          Telephone: (972)701-7000
          E-mail: rmills@hhdulaw.com

CapitalSpring SBLC, LLC, can be reached at:

          CAPITALSPRING SBLC, LLC
          5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 785
          Dallas, TX 75225

CapitalSpring SBLC, LLC is represented by:

          Benjamin E. Grant, Esq.
          WAGSTAFF LLP
          290 Cedar
          Abilene, TX 79601-5720
          Telephone: (325) 677-6291
          E-mail: bgrant@wagstafflaw.com

                    About Four Dia

Four Dia, LLC, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case
No. 16-33459-11) on Sept. 2, 2016.  The Debtor is represented by
Russell W. Mills, Esq., at Hiersche, Hayward, Drakeley & Urbach,
P.C.

Four Dia was formed on October 8, 2014 as a Texas limited liability
company and continues to operate using that corporate structure.
It operates a 62-room hotel located at 5750 Sherwood Way in San
Angelo, Texas which is operated under a Wyndham Hotel Group
franchise. Four Dia employs approximately 16 persons on a full or
part-time basis.


FPMI SOLUTIONS: Auction of Excess Furniture and Equipment Approved
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brian F. Kenney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia authorized FPMI Solutions, Inc., to sell
excess furniture and equipment at public auction.  No objections
have been filed.

                       About FPMI Solutions

Headquartered in Alexandria, Virginia, FPMI Solutions, Inc., is a
government contractor that operates as a business partner to
organizations.  The company's federal solutions include human
capital management, human capital outsourcing, and learning
services.  Its global/commercial solutions include strategic HR
consulting solutions, recruitment process outsourcing and executive
search, temporary service providers, shared services, and learning
services.

FPMI Solutions sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case
No. 16-12142) on June 20, 2016.  Judge Robert G. Mayer presides
over the case.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities in the range of
$1,000,000 to $10,000,000.

The Debtor tapped Paul Sweeney, Esq., at the Ymkas, Vidmar,
Sweeney
& Mulrenin, LLC, as counsel.

The petition was signed by R. Mark McLindon, chief executive
officer.


FREEFALL ADVENTURES: Robair Offers $20K for Beech 95-B55 Airplane
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Freefall Adventures and its affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of New Jersey to authorize the private sale
of Beech Model 95-B55, T42A Airplane, Serial No. TC823, together
with log books, maintenance and flight manuals to Robair, LLC for
$20,000, subject to higher and better offers.

The Debtors owned and operated several airplanes and a skydiving
jump center based in Williamstown, New Jersey.  Through the Chapter
11 cases, the Debtor sold several airplanes and the skydiving jump
center and to streamline their operations and liquidate certain
non-essential assets so that the Debtor can ultimately propose and
confirm a Chapter 11 plan.

Among Freefall Adventures' remaining assets is the Beech, which the
Debtors believe has a market value of approximately $20,000. There
are no liens or encumbrances on the Beech.

As part of the Debtors' overall strategy to liquidate certain of
their assets to fund a Chapter 11 plan, the Debtors seek authority
to sell the Beech.  The sale will enable the Debtors to avoid
payment of unnecessary administrative claims and expenses
associated with the continued ownership of the Beech such as
maintenance and insurance.

The Debtors intend to sell the Beech as the result of good faith,
arm's length negotiations to Robair.  None of the Debtors' officers
or principals will receive any benefit from the sale of the Beech.
A purchase agreement has been executed and is available upon
written request from the Debtor's counsel.

The Debtors have marketed the Beech for a number of years and the
present offer is the highest and best offer they received to date.
Moreover, they believe that they will be able to maximize the sale
price of the Beech by completing a private sale rather than
including the Beech in an auction.

The Debtors propose these procedures to complete the sale of the
Beech:

   a. The Debtors will maintain a list of all parties that express
an interest in the Beech, with each person's contact information
and determine if any of such parties will submit a higher and
better offer than Robair.  The offer from Robair is subject to
higher and better offers.

   b. If an objection is filed, the Debtors will not complete a
sale absent a resolution with the objecting party or further order
of the Court.

Counsel for the Debtor:

          Arthur J. Abramowitz, Esq.
          SHERMAN, SILVERSTEIN, KOHL,
          ROSE & PODOLSKY, P.A.
          308 Harper Drive, Suite 200
          Moorestown, NJ 08057
          Telephone: (856) 662-0700

                    About Freefall Adventures

Williamstown, New Jersey-based Freefall Adventures operates out of
Cross Keys Airport in Monroe Township and is a mainstay in the
regional skydiving community.

Freefall Adventures sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. N.J.
Case No. 14-30235) on Oct. 2, 2014.  Judge presides over the Andrew
B. Altenburg Jr.

The Debtor estimated assets in the range of $0 to $50,000 and $1
million to $10 million in debt.

The Debtor tapped Lewis G. Adler, Esq. at the law Office of Lewis
Alder as counsel.

The petition was signed by John Eddowes, authorized individual.



GEI HOLDINGS: Selling Three New Jersey Properties for $783K
-----------------------------------------------------------
GEI Holdings, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of New Jersey to authorize the private sale of its properties
located at 137-139 Carolina Ave, Irvington, NJ, to David J. Tucker
for $249,000; at 229 Columbia Avenue, Irvington, NJ, to Jamal
Hawkins for $249,000; and at 140-142 Huntington Terrace, Newark,
NJ, to Linda Gindi for $285,000.

The Debtor is the sole owner of the following properties:

   a. Carolina Property
   b. Huntington Property
   c. Columbia Property
   d. 250 Clinton Place, Newark, NJ
   e. 252 Clinton Place, Newark, NJ
   f. 433-434 Leslie Street, Newark, NJ

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor valued its interest in the
properties is $810,000.

On Aug. 5, 2016, Gloria R. Buckley legal counsel filed a notice of
appearance for creditor Wilmington Trust, N.A.

On Aug. 9, 2016, the Creditor filed a Relief Stay Motion.

On Aug. 10, 2016 the case was reassigned from Hon. Judge Vincent
Papalia to Hon. Judge John K. Sherwood.

On Aug. 10-12, 2016, the Creditor filed a Motion for Relief from
Stay with regards to Debtor's properties. A hearing date was set
for Aug. 23, 2016.

The Debtor has entered into 3 separate arms-length contracts to
sell the Carolina Property, Huntington Property and Columbia
Property. The total purchase price for the purchased assets will be
$783,000.

A copy of the Contracts of Sale attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/GEI_HOldings_30_Sales.pdf

Said properties are encumbered by a mortgage held by a single
creditor; Wilmington Trust National Association as Trustee on
Behalf of the Holders of B2R Mortgage Trust 2015-1 Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, in the total amount of $927,294.

From the proceeds of the Sale, the Debtor proposes to pay the costs
of the sale, including reasonable attorney's fees, real estate
commissions and taxes.  In addition, the Debtor proposes to pay
creditors that have an undisputed secured interest in the property
order of priority, as of the date of closing.

Based on the results of its analysis of the Debtor's ongoing and
future business prospects, the Debtor's management has concluded
that a sale of substantially all of Debtor's assets as a going
concern, is the best method to maximize recoveries and ensure that
the value of the Debtor's assets is maintained for the benefit of
creditors and its estate.  Maximization of asset value is a sound
business purpose, warranting authorization of the sale.  After
taking into account the disputes between the parties that will be
resolved as part of the proposed sale and the avoidance of delay,
the terms of the sales, represent the highest and best offer for
the purchased assets.

The Debtor believes that the purchase price represents a fair value
for the purchased assets. Additionally, by selling the purchased
assets to the Buyers by private sale, the Debtor will avoid the
significant administrative expenses associated with the approval
and management of an auction process, as well as the costs of
advertising and soliciting bids from other parties where the Debtor
believes that a reasonable offer has been made for the purchased
assets by the Buyers.

To preserve the value of the purchased assets and limit the costs
of administering and preserving such assets, it is critical that
the Debtor close the sales as soon as possible after all closing
conditions have been met or waived.  Accordingly, the Debtor
requests that the Court waive the 10-day stay period under B.R.
6004(h).

The Purchasers can be reached at:

          David J. Tucker
          137-139 Carolina Avenue
          Irvington, NJ 07111

          Jamal Hawkins
          110 Renner Avenue
          Newark, NJ 07112

          Linda Gindi
          131 8th Street
          Brooklyn, NY 11215

Counsel for the Debtor:

          Robert B. Davis, Esq.
          DAVIS LAW CENTER, LLC
          48 Van Buren Street, 2nd Floor
          Newark NJ 07105
          Telephone:(917) 315-7566
          Facsimile:(973) 850-3064
          E-mail: rob@davislawcenterllc.com

GEI Holdings, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case
No. 16-24991) on Aug. 4, 2016.


GENERAL PRODUCTS: Hilco to Auction Russellville Assets
------------------------------------------------------
General Products Corp., and affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to authorize the public
auction sale of the remaining equipment and other assets at their
Russellville, Kentucky facility, to be conducted by Hilco
Industrial, LLC ("Hilco").

Prior to the Debtor's bankruptcy filing, it operated three
facilities located in Angola, Indiana, Russellville Facility and
Mexico.  The Russellville Facility's sole customer was Eaton Corp.
("Eaton").

Prior to the Petition Date, Eaton provided the Debtor with notice
that it was insourcing all production from the Russellville
Facility.  Eaton's last day of production for the Russellville
Facility was June 30, 2016.  Since that date, the Debtor has worked
to idle the Russellville Facility.

Upon receiving the insourcing notification from Eaton and
confirming with the proposed stalking horse bidder for the Debtor's
assets comprising its Angola, Indiana and Mexico operations
("Angola/Mexico Stalking Horse") that it was not interested in the
Russellville Facility or its assets without any current business,
the Debtor commenced efforts to locate a buyer for the Russellville
Facility.

The Debtor recently reached an agreement with PTL Logistics to
serve as the stalking horse bidder for the Russellville Facility
real property, subject to higher and better bids and Court
approval. The Debtor filed its motion to approve the sale and
procedures related to soliciting higher and better bids.

However, conditions of the agreement with the stalking horse
include that the closing occur as expeditiously as possible and
that the Debtor provide occupancy of the Russellville Facility at
closing.  In order to provide occupancy of the Russellville
Facility, the Debtor must first complete a liquidation of the
remaining equipment and other personal property in the facility.

Certain of the personal property in the Russellville Facility is
contemplated to be purchased by the Angola/Mexico Stalking Horse
pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement between the parties.
However, the remaining personal property at the Russellville
Facility ("Russellville Assets") must be sold or auctioned to
interested bidders.

The Debtor obtained proposals from several reputable equipment
marketing firms and determined, after significant consultation and
input from the Creditors' Committee and MB Financial Bank, N.A.,
the Debtors' secured lender with an interest in the Russellville
Assets, that the proposal from Hilco provided the most favorable
terms for the Debtor and its estate and would likely lead to
maximizing the proceeds realized from the Russellville Assets.

Contemporaneous with the filing of the Motion, the Debtor has filed
an application to employ Hilco as its auctioneer pursuant to the
terms of the Asset Marketing Agreement dated as of Aug. 24, 2016.

A copy of the list of assets to be sold and the AMA attached to the
Motion is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/General_Products_288_Sales.pdf

The AMA contemplates that Hilco would sell the Russellville Assets
in a manner it determines is likely to maximize the value of the
assets, including by conducting an online public auction of the
Russellville Assets on Oct. 13, 2016.

Under the AMA, Hilco is providing a guaranteed return to the Debtor
of $350,000 ("Guaranty Amount"), which will be paid to the Debtor
no later than 2 days prior to the auction.

Upon payment of the Guaranty Amount, Hilco will be entitled to
retain the first $425,000 in proceeds from the sale of the
Russellville Assets.  Subsequently, Hilco and the Debtor will split
all remaining proceeds from the sales of the Russellville Assets
with 20% to be paid to Hilco and 80% to the Debtor. Additionally,
Hilco will be entitled to charge a buyer's premium of 16% on all
sales.

Pursuant to the AMA, Hilco agrees to market, at its expense, the
Russellville Assets and the auction and take such other steps as it
deems necessary to maximize the value of the Russellville Assets.
Further, given Hilco's compensation structure, it is incentivized
to maximize such value.

The Debtor believes Hilco has appropriate expertise in handling
auction sales and is well qualified to handle and conduct the
online auction sale in this case. Hilco's Russellville Assets with
priority over all claims. All sales of the Russellville Assets will
be on a cash basis pursuant to bids received during the online
auction.

The Debtors have a sound business justification for selling the
Russellville Assets at this time, namely that the Russellville
Facility is idle and must be sold in short order in order to
maximize value of that asset.  Because of the cost of maintaining
an idle facility, it is even more critical that the Debtor complete
the liquidation of the Russellville Facility on an expedited basis.
Without completing a liquidation of the personal property and
equipment in the Russellville Facility, the Debtor will be unable
to provide occupancy of the Russellville Facility at closing.
Accordingly, the Debtors ask the Court's approval to sell the
Russelville Assets in accordance with the AMA.

                      About General Products

General Products Corporation and General Products Mexico, LLC, both
based in Livonia, MI, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.
Mich. Case Nos. 16-49267 and 16-49269) on June 27, 2016.  The Hon.
Thomas J. Tucker (16-49267) and Walter Shapero (16-49269) preside
over the cases. Rachel L. Hillegonds, Esq. and John T. Piggins,
Esq., at Miller Johnson, as bankruptcy counsel.

General Products Corporation estimated $50 million to $50 million
in both assets and liabilities.  General Products Mexico estimated
$50,000 to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.  The
petition was signed by Andrew Masullo, president and CEO.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed 5 creditors of General
Products to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors.


GEORGE HENRY: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 10% Under Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
George Henry Richards filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California a combined plan of reorganization
and disclosure statement dated Aug. 16, 2016.

Under the Plan, general unsecured creditors will be paid 10% of
their allowed claims in monthly payments over 60 months.

If the Plan is confirmed, the payments promised in the Plan
constitute new contractual obligations that replace the Debtor's
pre-confirmation debts. Creditors may not seize their collateral or
enforce their pre-confirmation debts so long as Debtor performs all
obligations under the Plan. If Debtor defaults in performing Plan
obligations, any creditor can file a motion to have the case
dismissed or converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation, or enforce their
non-bankruptcy rights. Debtor will be discharged from all
pre-confirmation debts (with certain exceptions) if Debtor makes
all Plan payments. Enforcement of the Plan, discharge of the
Debtor, and creditors’ remedies if Debtor defaults are described
in detail in Parts 5 and 6 of the Plan.

Class 2(a) Small Claims includes any creditor whose allowed claim
is $1,200 or less, and any creditor in Class 2(b) whose allowed
claim is larger than $1,200 but agrees to reduce its claim to
$1,200.  Each creditor will receive on the Effective Date of the
Plan a single payment equal to 10% of its allowed claim.  Creditors
in this class may not take any collection action against Debtor so
long as Debtor is not in material default under the Plan.
Claimants in this class are impaired and are entitled to vote on
confirmation of the Plan, unless their claims are paid in full with
interest on the Effective Date of the Plan.

Class 2(b) (Other) General Unsecured Claims Creditors will receive
10% of their allowed claim in 60 equal monthly payments (a total of
$337.13 in monthly payments), due on the 1st day of the month
beginning on the month after the Effective Date.  Creditors in this
class may not take any collection action against Debtor so long as
Debtor is not in material default under the Plan.  This class is
impaired and is entitled to vote on confirmation of the Plan.  The
Debtor has indicated above whether a particular claim is disputed.

The Disclosure Statement is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb14-30320-142.pdf

The Plan was filed by the Debtor's counsel:

     Matthew D. Metzger, Esq.
     BELVEDERE LEGAL, PC
     1777 Borel Pl., Suite 314
     San Mateo, CA 94402
     Tel: (415) 513-5980
     Fax: (415) 513-5985
     E-mail: mmetzger@belvederelegal.com

George Henry Richards filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. N.D. Calif. Case No. 14-30320).


GLORI ENERGY: Decrease in Cash Raises Substantial Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------
Glori Energy Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $3.25
million on $1.23 million of total revenues for the three months
ended June 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $4.92 million on
$2.63 million of total revenues for the same period in 2015.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company listed a net
loss of $6.65 million on $2.43 million of total revenues, compared
to a net loss of $7.90 million on $5.20 million of total revenues
for the same period in the prior year.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $13.50 million in total
assets, $13.36 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' equity of $136,000.

At June 30, 2016, the Company had a working capital deficit of $6.4
million, made up of current assets of $5.5 million and current
liabilities of $11.9 million.

Cash has decreased from $8.4 million at December 31, 2015 to $3.1
million at June 30, 2016 due to the net cash used in operating
activities of $3.3 million, the repayment of debt of $316 thousand,
capital expenditures of $1.4 million and other uses of $300
thousand.  As of August 2016, the Company does not have lines of
credit available to it.  As a result of the negative operating cash
flows, the Company will need to raise capital over the next six to
nine months to fund its operations and to repay or refinance the
term note of $10.2 million, owed by GEP, which matures March 2017.
The Company may have difficulty obtaining such additional financing
as a result of the decrease in oil prices, its negative cash flows
from operations and the significant decrease in its share price.

The significant risks, uncertainties, significant working capital
deficit, historical operating losses and resulting cash used in
operations raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at the SEC at:

                  https://is.gd/JRBSWv

Glori Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: GLRI) is an energy technology and oil
production company based in Houston.  The Company deploys its AERO
technology to increase the amount of oil that can be produced from
conventional fields at a substantially lower cost than traditional
enhanced oil recovery methods.



GLOYD GREEN: Selling Midway Cabin to West for $414K
---------------------------------------------------
Gloyd W. Green asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Utah to authorize the sale of a cabin property located at 5132
North Larkspur Road, Midway, Utah, to Terry West for $414,000.

The Debtor and West entered into Real Estate Purchase Contract
("REPC") dated Aug. 23, 2016.

The pertinent terms and conditions of the REPC are as follows:

   a. The Buyer will pay the purchase price in cash at closing,
with the option of credit bidding a portion of the purchase price
through an offset of the Buyer's Class A-6 Secured Claim in
accordance with 11 U.S.C. Section 363(k).

   b. The Seller will purchase a one-year home warranty plan for
Buyer's benefit at a cost not to exceed $530.

   c. Title will be conveyed at closing by warranty deed.

   d. The property will be sold in an "as is, where is" condition,
without warranty as to the condition of the property or the
suitability for the Buyers.

   e. The Seller will provide Buyer with a standard form owner's
insurance policy at closing.

The Debtor requests authority to pay the following at closing:

   1. All applicable commissions, closing costs and title fees
associated with the transaction and customary in the industry,
including a realtor's commission to Kathy Collings and the firm of
Berkshire Hathaway Home Services Utah ("Realtors") in the amount of
6% of the selling price as set forth in the listing agreement;

   2. All accrued and pro-rated real estate taxes and other
assessments which may be owed as of the date of closing; and

   3. All amounts needed for satisfaction in full of the Class A-6
Secured Claim in the event the Buyer does not credit bid the Class
A-6 Secured Claim.

The Debtor asks the Court to approve bidding procedures for the
sale of the property:

    a. All competing offers or bids for the property must be in
writing and must be received by the Debtor's counsel no later than
5:00 p.m. on Sept. 29, 2016.

   b. Along with the written offer or bid, each bidder must also
submit to Debtor's counsel by the same deadline a $2,000 deposit
that will be applied to the purchase price if the bid is successful
and will be returned to the bidder if the bid is not successful,
together with written evidence of a commitment for financing or
other evidence of ability to consummate the proposed purchase of
the property.

   c. A "Qualified Bidder" will be any bidder who submits the
foregoing items to Debtor's counsel on or before the foregoing
deadline, and any competing offer or bid so submitted will be a
"Qualified Bid."

   d. In the event that a qualified bid is not received by Debtor's
counsel, the Debtor will ask the Court to approve the sale to the
Buyer on the terms set forth in the REPC at the hearing on the
Motion, which is scheduled for Oct. 4, 2016, commencing at the hour
of 9:30 a.m.

   e. In the event that a qualified bid is received by the Debtor's
counsel, Debtor's counsel will conduct an auction ("Auction") of
the Property.  The auction will take place at 10:00 a.m. on Oct. 3,
2016, in the lobby near the ground floor elevators on the south end
of the Bankruptcy Court at 350 South Main Street, Salt Lake City,
Utah.  The auction will be limited to the buyer and all qualified
bidders.

   f. The Debtor's counsel will conduct the auction by announcing
the highest and best qualified bid.  The auction will then be
opened to competing bids.  The Debtor's counsel will entertain
competing bids for the property in such successive rounds as
Debtor's counsel determines in his sole discretion to be
appropriate so as to obtain the highest and best bid for the
property.  The Debtor's counsel may also set opening bid amounts in
each round of bidding as he determines appropriate.

   g. At the Auction, the Debtor and his counsel will review each
bid on the basis of financial and contractual terms and the factors
relevant to the sale process, including the speed and certainty of
closing the sale, and then identify the person submitting the
highest and best offer for the property ("Successful Bidder" and
"Successful Bid").

   h. The Debtor will present the successful bid to the Court for
approval at the hearing on the Motion, which will be conducted at
9:30 a.m. on Oct. 4, 2016.

A copy of the Real Estate Purchase Contract attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Gloyd_Green_139_Sales.pdf

Counsel for the Debtor:

          Chris L. Schmutz, Esq.
          SCHMUTZ & MOHLMAN, LLC
          190 North Main #100
          Bountiful, UT 84010
          Telephone: (801) 298-4800
          Facsimile: (801) 298-4804
          E-mail: chrisschmutz.pc@gmail.com

Gloyd W. Green sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Utah Case
No. 15-25181) on June 3, 2015.



GREYSTONE LOGISTICS: Reports Record Sales for Fiscal 2016
---------------------------------------------------------
Tulsa-based Greystone Logistics, Inc., reported sales for the
fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, of $26,340,405 compared to
$22,293,922 in fiscal year 2015, an increase of $4,046,483, or
18.2%.  Greystone's sales to its major customer in fiscal year 2016
were 41% of total sales compared to 51% in the prior year.  Pallet
sales to a new major customer increased from zero to 15% of total
sales in fiscal year 2016.  Greystone's net income was $836,134 in
fiscal year 2016 compared to $609,569 in fiscal year 2015.
Greystone recorded net income available to common stockholders for
fiscal year 2016 of $271,426, or $.01 per share, compared to
$57,565, or $0.00 per share, in fiscal year 2015.

Warren Kruger CEO stated, "We anticipate driving top line sales
during the next fiscal year and will continue to be diligent and
cognizant of our need to drive down costs of production through
innovation, automation, and scale focusing on providing returns
that our shareholders' expect.  Since last quarter's announcement
of a new machine, two additional new machines have been placed into
production to accommodate growing demand for Greystone's products.
Much of this demand is for a newly designed pallet being
manufactured and sold to a lease pool customer that rents the
pallets.  The combination of strength, standardization, ease of
cleaning, and recyclability are driving customer conversion from
wood to plastic.  Greystone has the best engineered injection
molded pallet line in the world with innovative designs allowing
superior racking strength, high coefficient of friction anti-skid
solutions, proprietary freezer additives allowing for use in
environments of -30 degrees Fahrenheit, and utilizing 100% recycled
and recyclable plastic content."

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/aPXao3

                   About Greystone Logistics

Tulsa, Okla.-based Greystone Logistics, Inc. (OTC BB: GLGI.OB -
News) -- http://www.greystonelogistics.com/-- manufactures and
sells plastic pallets through its wholly owned subsidiary,
Greystone Manufacturing, LLC.  Greystone sells its pallets through
direct sales and a network of independent contractor distributors.
Greystone also sells its pallets and pallet leasing services to
certain large customers direct through its President, Senior Vice
President of Sales and Marketing and other employees.

As of May 31, 2016, Greystone had $19.9 million in total assets,
$20.6 million in total liabilities, and a total deficit of
$724,000.


GULFMARK OFFSHORE: Joined Barclays CEO Energy Power Conference
--------------------------------------------------------------
Quintin Kneen, president & chief executive officer of GulfMark
Offshore, Inc. presented on Sept. 8, 2016, at the Barclays CEO
Energy Power Conference held in New York, New York.  Copies of the
presentation slides used at the presentation are available for free
at https://is.gd/vM8cUH

                       About Gulfmark
  
GulfMark Offshore, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was incorporated
in 1996.  The Company provides offshore marine support and
transportation services primarily to companies involved in the
offshore exploration and production of oil and natural gas.  The
Company's vessels transport materials, supplies and personnel to
offshore facilities, and also move and position drilling and
production facilities.  The majority of our operations are
conducted in the North Sea, offshore Southeast Asia and offshore
the Americas.  The Company currently operates a fleet of 73 owned
or managed offshore supply vessels, or OSVs, in the following
regions: 30 vessels in the North Sea, 13 vessels offshore Southeast
Asia, and 30 vessels offshore the Americas.  The Company's fleet is
one of the world's youngest, largest and most geographically
balanced, high specification OSV fleets.  The Company's owned
vessels have an average age of approximately nine years.

Gulfmark reported a net loss of $215 million in 2015 following net
income of $62.4 million in 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, Gulfmark had $1.12 billion in total assets,
$587 million in total liabilities, and $541 million in total
stockholders' equity.

                           *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on March 15, 2016, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services lowered its corporate credit rating on Houston-based,
marine transportation services company GulfMark Offshore Inc. to
'CCC' from 'B-'.

The TCR also reported on Feb. 26, 2016, that Moody's Investors
Service downgraded GulfMark Offshore Inc.'s (GulfMark) Corporate
Family Rating (CFR) to Caa3 from B3, Probability of Default Rating
(PDR) to Caa3-PD from B3-PD, and senior unsecured notes to Ca from
Caa1.


HAGGEN HOLDINGS: Committee Sues Comvest for Asset-Stripping
-----------------------------------------------------------
Matt Chiappardi, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reported that the
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Haggen Holdings
LLC bankruptcy case launched an adversary action accusing the
Company's former principal stakeholder, Comvest Partners, of a
"Machiavellian scheme" to strip assets from the company before it
filed for Chapter 11 protection last year.  The Committee filed a
145-page, 78-count complaint, saying Comvest hatched a scheme in
the wake of Haggen's acquisition of 146 supermarkets from
Albertsons LLC in 2014 that "covertly siphoned away valuable real
estate assets.

                     About Haggen Holdings

Headquartered in Bellingham, Washington, Haggen was founded in
1933
as a single grocery store.  From 1933 to 2014, Haggen grew into a
30 store family-run grocery chain, with stores located in the
northwestern United States.  From 2011 to 2014, Haggen reduced its
store base to 18, including a stand-alone pharmacy location.

Haggen rapidly expanded in 2014 and 2015, and, as of the Petition
Date, Haggen owned and operated 164 stores through three operating
companies: Haggen, Inc., Haggen Opco North, LLC and Haggen Opco
South, LLC.

Haggen Holdings, LLC, and its affiliates filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 15-11874 to
15-11879) on Sept. 8, 2015, with the intention of reorganizing, or
selling as a going concern, their stores for the benefit of their
creditors.

The petitions were signed by Blake Barnett, the chief financial
officer.

The Debtors estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and
estimated liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, is serving as the Debtors'
local counsel.  Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP serves as the
Debtors' general counsel.  Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC,
acts as the Debtors' financial advisor.  Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC serves as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

T. Patrick Tinker, assistant U.S. Trustee for Region 3, appointed
seven creditors to the official committee of unsecured creditors.
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP serves as counsel to the
Committee.  Giuliano, Miller & Company, LLC, serves as tax
advisors
to the Committee.


HALCON RESOURCES: Wins Confirmation of Chapter 11 Plan
------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Montgomery, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reported that
Halcon Resources Corp. reported next-day plans to emerge from
bankruptcy, one day after overcoming limited U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission objections and winning confirmation of a
modified prepackaged Chapter 11 plan in Delaware bankruptcy court.

Company attorney Joseph H. Smolinsky of Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
told Judge Brendan Lyman Shannon the exit from Chapter 11 was
driven by concern for the company's stock, which has continued to
trade on the New York Stock Exchange despite its retreat to Chapter
11.

A copy of the Court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, An
Order (I) Approving The Debtors (A) Disclosure Statement, (B)
Solicitation Of Votes And Voting Procedures, And (C) Forms Of
Ballots, And (I) Confirming The Amended Joint Prepackaged Chapter
11 Plan Of Halcon Resources Corporation, et al. Under Chapter 11 Of
The Bankruptcy Code, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb16-11724

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 1, 2016, under
the Restructuring Plan, the Company will eliminate approximately
$1.8 billion in long-term debt and will reduce annual interest
expense by more than $200 million.  The Restructuring Plan also
provides that existing holders of Halcon common stock will receive
4.0% of the common stock of the reorganized Company (subject to
dilution set forth in the Restructuring Plan).

Halcon sought bankruptcy protection after a successful solicitation
for support of the Restructuring Plan from the Company's 13.0% 3rd
Lien Notes due 2022, its three tranches of senior unsecured notes
comprised of its 9.75% Senior Notes due 2020, its 8.875% Senior
Notes due 2021, and its 9.25% Senior Notes due 2022, its 8.0%
Convertible Note due 2020 and its 5.75% Series A Perpetual
Convertible Preferred Stock.  This solicitation resulted in
overwhelming support for the Restructuring Plan with the Company
having received acceptances from more than 95% in number and over
99% in aggregate amount of claims and interests in each Affected
Stakeholder class that voted on the Plan.  In addition, as
previously announced, Halcon also reached an agreement with holders
of more than 51% in aggregate principal amount of its 8.625% and
12.0% 2nd Lien Notes due 2020 and 2022 regarding certain amendments
to the indentures governing such notes in exchange for the
commitment of such holders to support the Restructuring Plan.

At the time of the bankruptcy filing, Halcon said the Restructuring
Plan is expected to conclude in approximately 45 to 60 days.  

                  About Halcon Resources

Halcon Resources Corporation is an independent energy company
engaged in the acquisition, production, exploration and
development
of onshore oil and natural gas properties in the United States.

Halcon Resources and 21 of its subsidiaries each filed a voluntary
petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del.
Case Nos. 16-11724 through 16-11745) on July 27, 2016.  The
petitions were signed by Stephen W. Herod as president.  The
Debtors listed assets of $2.84 billion and debts of $3.14 billion
as of March 31, 2016.

The Debtors have hired Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP and
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as co-counsel; PJT Partners LP as
investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as
restructuring advisor; and Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC as
claims, noticing and solicitation agent.


HANCOCK FABRICS: Selling De Minimis Assets to Datamax for $118K
---------------------------------------------------------------
Hancock Fabrics, Inc., and its affiliates, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a notice indicating
its plans to sell de minimis assets to Datamax System Solutions for
$118,250.

The de minimis assets to be sold by the Debtors consist of certain
point-of-sale, scanning, and data collection equipment, along with
ancillary equipment and accessories.

On May 24, 2016, the Court approved the Order Authorizing and
Approving Expedited Procedures for the Sale or Abandonment of De
Minimis Assets ("Sale Order"), whereby the Court authorized the
Debtors to sell de minimis assets.

As part of the marketing process, the Debtors contacted parties
known to be interested in similar assets and established the sale
price through an iterative solicitation process.  The Debtors
propose to sell the De Minimis Assets to Datamax for $118,250 on a
final cash sale, as is where is basis.

Datamax has no connection to the Debtors.

Any parties may object to the proposed sale within 10 business days
following service of the notice by writing to the Debtors' counsel,
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. and O'Melveny & Myers LLP.

                       About Hancock Fabrics

Hancock Fabrics, Inc., is a specialty fabric retailer operating
stores under the name "Hancock Fabrics".  Hancock has 4,500
full-time and part time employees.  The Baldwyn, Mississippi-based
company is one of the largest fabric retailers in the United
States, operating 260 stores in 37 states as of October 31, 2015
and an internet store under the domain name
http://www.hancockfabrics.com/       

Hancock Fabrics, Inc. and six of its affiliates, retailer of
fabric, sewing and accessories, filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 16-10296 to 16-10302) on Feb.
2, 2016.  Dennis Lyons, the senior vice president and chief
administrative officer, signed the petitions.  Judge Brendan
Linehan Shannon is assigned to the jointly administered cases.

The Debtors have engaged O'Melveny & Myers LLP as general counsel,
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., as local counsel, Clear Thinking
Group LLC as financial advisor, Retail Consulting Services, Inc.
d/b/a Real Estate Advisors as real estate advisors and Kurtzman
Carson Consultants, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $151.4 million and total
debts of $182.1 million.  The Debtors owe its trade vendors
approximately $21.2 million as of Jan. 31, 2016.



HANJIN SHIPPING: Troubles Leave $14-Bil. in Cargo Stranded at Sea
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Costas Paris and Erica E. Phillips, writing for The Wall Street
Journal, reported that the financial woes of one of the world's
biggest shipping lines have left as much as $14 billion worth of
cargo stranded at sea, sending its owners scurrying to try to
recover their goods and get them to customers, according to
industry executives, brokers and cargo owners.

According to the report, since Hanjin Shipping Co. of South Korea
filed for bankruptcy protection, dozens of ships carrying more than
half a million cargo containers have been denied access to ports
around the world because of uncertainty about who would pay docking
fees, container-storage and unloading bills.  Some of those ships
have been seized by the company's creditors, the report related.

Samsung Electronics Co., which makes the Galaxy smartphone and
other devices, said it has cargo valued at about $38 million
stranded on Hanjin ships in international waters, the report said.
Samsung said it is considering chartering 16 cargo planes to
fulfill its shipment contracts, mostly to the U.S., the report
related.

Though Hanjin accounts for only about 3.2% of global container
capacity, the disruption, which comes as retailers prepare to stock
their shelves for the holiday season, is expected to be costly, as
companies scramble to book their goods on other carriers, the
report further related.

Analysts don't expect the snarl to leave U.S. retailers with
inventory shortfalls for the holidays, but the longer the logjam
drags on, the greater the risk, the report said.

                      About Hanjin Shipping

Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd. is mainly engaged in the transportation
business through containerships, transportation business through
bulk carriers and terminal operation business.  The Debtor is a
stock-listed corporation with a total of 245,269,947 issued shares
(common shares, KRW 5000 per share) and paid-in capital totaling
KRW 1,226,349,735,000.  Of these shares 33.23% is owned by Korean
Air Lines Co., Ltd., 3.08% by Debtor and 0.34% by employee
shareholders' association.

The Company operates approximately 60 regular lines worldwide, with
140 container or bulk vessels transporting over 100 million tons of
cargo per year.  It also operates 13 terminals specialized for
containers, two distribution centers and six Off Dock Container
Yards in major ports and inland areas around the world.  The
Company is a member of "CKYHE," a global shipping conference and
also a partner of "The Alliance," another global shipping
conference to be launched in April 2017.

As a result of the severe lack of liquidity, Hanjin applied to
the Seoul Central District Court 6th Bench of Bankruptcy Division
for the commencement of rehabilitation under the Debtor
Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act on Aug. 31, 2016.

Hanjin filed in the U.S. a voluntary petition under Chapter 15 of
the Bankruptcy Code on Sept. 2, 2016 to seek recognition of its
Korean restructuring.  The Chapter 15 case (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No.
16-27041) is pending before Judge John K. Sherwood.

Cole Schotz P.C. serves as counsel to Tai-Soo Suk, the Chapter 15
petitioner and the duly appointed foreign representative of Hanjin
Shipping.


HARRINGTON & KING: Has Interim Nod to Use Inland Bank Cash
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Deborah L. Thorne of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois authorized The Harrington & King
Perforating Co., Inc. and Harrington & King South, Inc., to use
Inland Bank and Trust's cash collateral on an interim basis.

The Debtors are indebted to Inland Bank in the amount of
$4,057,788.

Judge Thorne acknowledged that the Debtor's use of cash collateral
will prevent immediate and irreparable harm to the Debtor's estate
and enhance the possibility of maximizing the value of the Debtor's
business and assets.

The approved Budget covers the period beginning with the week
ending September 2, 2016 and ending with the week ending September
16, 2016.  The Budget provides for total cash disbursements in the
amount of $220,725.

Inland Bank was granted replacement liens in addition to its
prepetition liens, and an allowed claim, to the extent the adequate
protection of the interests of Inland Bank in the prepetition
collateral proves insufficient, with priority over all claims,
subject to Carveout.

The Carveout consists of:

     (a) all fees required to be paid to the Office of the United
States Trustee; and

     (b) with respect to each Carveout Professional, the allowed
fees and disbursements as may be awarded to such Carveout
Professional from time to time.

A further hearing on the Debtor's Motion was scheduled on September
7, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order, dated September 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/G99FHi

           About The Harrington & King Perforating Co., Inc.

The Harrington & King Perforating Co., Inc. and Harrington & King
South Inc. are in the business of manufacturing perforating metal
sheets and rolled coils of varying gauges and types to produce hole
patterns of various sizes, shapes, and spacing.  Most of the work
is done to customer specifications and consists of high value-added
jobs, not typical of most metal punching.  The products are used in
automotive, acoustics, architecture, food and pharmaceutical
straining and filtering, interior design, manufacturing, safety
flooring, pollution control, transportation and mining cleaning and
grading, electronics and other fields.

The Debtors sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case Nos. 16-15650 and 16-15651) on May 7,
2016.  The petitions were signed by Greg McCallister, chief
restructuring officer and chief operating officer.

The cases are jointly administered under Case No. 16-15650.  The
cases are assigned to Judge Deborah L. Thorne.

The Debtors estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of
$1 million to $10 million.  The Debtors are represented by William
J. Factor, Esq., at FactorLaw.



HECK INDUSTRIES: Has Until October 26 to File Chapter 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Douglas D. Dodd of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Louisiana extended Heck Industries, Inc.'s exclusive
periods to file a plan and obtain acceptance of its plan, to
October 26, 2016 and December 26, 2016, respectively.

The Debtor previously sought the extensions of its exclusive
periods to file a chapter 11 plan and obtain acceptances to the
plan, contending that its plan will largely depend on the
negotiations among the Debtor, its secured lenders, and the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  The Debtor further
contended that the plan will also depend on the outcomes of certain
adversary proceedings which have been filed in connection with the
chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding.

                 About Heck Industries, Inc.

Heck Industries, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D.
La. Case No. 16-10516) on April 29, 2016. The case is assigned to
Judge Douglas D. Dodd.  William E. Steffes, Esq., Noel Steffes
Melancon, Esq., and Barbara B. Parsons, Esq., at Steffes, Vingiello
& McKenzie, L.L.C., serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtor is the owner of a concrete supply business which has
operated throughout Louisiana since 1957. The Debtor's chapter 11
case was precipitated by a severe strain on collection of its
accounts receivable due to, among other things, unfortunate weather
conditions hampering the Debtor's ability to complete numerous jobs
awarded to it.

The Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and debt
at the time of the filing.

The United States Trustee appointed Continental Cement Company,
Holcim (US) Inc., and Savard Labor & Marine, Inc. to serve on the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  The Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors are represented by Armistead M. Long, Esq.,
at Gordon Arata McCollam Duplantis & Eagan, LLC.



HOMETOWN HARDWARE: Has Until Sept. 13 to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Deborah J. Saltzman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California authorized Hometown Hardware &
Garden, Inc. to use cash collateral until Sept. 13, 2016, pursuant
to the Stipulation between the Debtor and secured lender Capital
Bank.

A continued hearing on the Debtor's Motion is scheduled on Sept.
13, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

Judge Saltzman directed the Debtor to file a 90-day cash flow
budget with the Court no later than September 8, 2016.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is available at
https://is.gd/dk98ad

                 About Hometown Hardware & Garden

Hometown Hardware & Garden, Inc. filed a chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-21359) on Aug. 25, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Gregory Guller, president.  The Debtor is
represented by Tuan Le, Esq., at the Law Office of Steve Lopez.
The case is assigned to Judge Deborah J. Saltzman.  The Debtor
estimated total assets at $1 million to $10 million and total
liabilities at $500,000 to $1 million at the time of the filing.


HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES: Tender Offer & Consent Solicitation Expire
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., disclosed that the tender offer of its
wholly-owned subsidiary, K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., to
purchase for cash any and all of its 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017
and related solicitation of consents expired Sept. 7, 2016, at 8:30
a.m., New York City time.  Notes tendered in the Tender Offer were
less than 90% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of
Notes on July 29, 2016, which was a condition to the Tender Offer
and Consent Solicitation.

As a result, K. Hovnanian will not accept for purchase or pay for
any Notes tendered pursuant to the Tender Offer and the proposed
amendments to the indenture under which the Notes were issued that
were the subject of the Consent Solicitation will not be effected.
K. Hovnanian has instructed the depositary and information agent to
promptly return all Notes previously tendered to the tendering
holders.

Concurrently with the launch of the Tender Offer and Consent
Solicitation, the Company and K. Hovnanian entered into financing
commitments with affiliates of a certain investment manager.  K.
Hovnanian intends to use a portion of the net cash proceeds of the
Financings to call the Notes for redemption at the closing of the
Financings, which is expected to occur on Sept. 8, 2016.  The Notes
will be redeemed for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the Notes plus a make-whole payment together with accrued
and unpaid interest on the Notes up to, but excluding, the
redemption date.  K. Hovnanian expects to deposit funds sufficient
to pay the Redemption Price and to satisfy and discharge the Notes
Indenture on the closing date of the Financings.  Upon satisfaction
and discharge of the Notes Indenture, the restrictive covenants and
events of default contained therein will cease to have effect.  The
aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Notes is
$121,043,000.

                 About Hovnanian Enterprises

Red Bank, New Jersey-based Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: HOV)
-- http://www.khov.com/-- founded in 1959 by Kevork S. Hovnanian,
is one of the nation's largest homebuilders with operations in
Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,
Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia and
West Virginia.  The Company's homes are marketed and sold under
the trade names K. Hovnanian Homes, Matzel & Mumford, Brighton
Homes, Parkwood Builders, Town & Country Homes, Oster Homes and
CraftBuilt Homes.  As the developer of K. Hovnanian's Four Seasons
communities, the Company is also one of the nation's largest
builders of active adult homes.

Hovnanian Enterprises reported a net loss of $16.1 million on
$2.14 billion of total revenues for the year ended Oct. 31, 2015,
compared to net income of $307 million on $2.06 billion of total
revenues for the year ended Oct. 31, 2014.

As of Jan. 31, 2016, Hovnanian had $2.55 billion in total assets,
$2.69 billion in total liabilities and a $143 million total
stockholders' deficit.

                           *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on April 22, 2016, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded the Corporate Family Rating of Hovnanian Enterprises,
Inc. to Caa2 and Probability of Default Rating to Caa2-PD.  The
downgrade of the Corporate Family Rating reflects Moody's
expectation that Hovnanian will need to dispose of assets and seek
alternative financing methods in order to meet its upcoming debt
maturity wall.

Hovnanian carries a 'CCC+' corporate credit rating from S&P Global
Ratings.

As reported by the TCR on Aug. 3, 2016, Fitch Ratings has affirmed
the ratings of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: HOV), including
the company's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'CCC'
following the recently announced financing commitments and proposed
tender offer for its existing unsecured notes.


J&E LAND: Pearce to Auction Two Shopping Centers on Oct. 13
-----------------------------------------------------------
Two shopping centers in Walker County, Alabama, are being sold in
an online auction as part of the ongoing liquidation of J&E Land
Company.  Pearce & Associates will market the retail properties
individually in an online auction scheduled to end Thursday, Oct.
13.

Medical Plaza East Shopping Center, located at 4331 Highway 78
East, Jasper, Alabama, is located near Walker Baptist Medical
Center, has 67,000 square feet of leasable space.  It currently has
13 tenants, including an Alabama ABC Store.

"This is a great location, surrounded by businesses that generate
traffic, including auto dealerships, restaurants, hotels and
medical practices," said Chip Pearce, president of the auction
company.

Also selling will be Walston Bridge Plaza, a 16,275-square-foot
shopping center at 301 Walston Bridge Road in Jasper.

"Both of these shopping centers are tremendous opportunities for
investors.  In each case, we will provide bidders with detailed
information, which includes copies of leases, tenant payment
history, surveys and environmental reports," said Mr. Pearce.

Bidders will be required to submit a deposit of $25,000 via
cashier's check or bank wire transfer.  Deposits of non-winning
bidders will be returned within 24 hours of the end of the
auction.

Mr. Pearce will provide a bid center on Thursday, October 13, where
bidders may bring deposits and get assistance with registration and
bidding.  The bid center will be located at the Hampton Inn on
Industrial Parkway in Jasper, Alabama.

Individuals seeking additional information may visit
http://auctionbypearce.com/or call 205-664-4300.

Jasper-based J&E Land Company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 13-02081) in 2013, citing
debts of more than $7.4 million.  The liquidation is being
administered by George E. Shoup, III, of Development Specialists,
Inc., as the Plan Trustee of the Liquidating Trust.

Pearce & Associates, based in Alabaster, markets real estate and
other assets throughout Alabama, primarily through online auctions.
Clients include estate executors, business owners, attorneys,
bankruptcy trustees and individuals.  The firm also has ongoing
contracts with many cities and counties for the sale of surplus
materials.

Development Specialists, Inc. (DSI) is a national provider of
management consulting and financial advisory services, including
turnaround consulting, fiduciary roles, financial restructure,
litigation support, wind-down oversight and forensic accounting
services.


JACKSON MASONRY: Selling Nashville Property for $475K
-----------------------------------------------------
Jackson Masonry, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Tennessee to authorize the sale of real property
located at 657 Old Hickory Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee to
Contract Properties, LLC, for $475,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 4, 2016.  The objection
deadline is Sept. 22.

The Debtor is indebted to Franklin Synergy Bank ("Lender") pursuant
to a Commercial Line of Credit Agreement and Note ("Note") and a
Business Loan Agreement ("Loan Agreement"), each dated Feb. 9,
2016.  On June 28, 2016, the Lender filed a proof of claim in the
case (ECF Claim No. 6), which reflects an outstanding balance on
the Note of $238,150 due as of the Petition Date.

The Note is secured by a Commercial Open-Ended Deed of Trust dated
February ("Deed of Trust") dated Feb. 9, 2016, which granted the
Lender a lien on the property.

The Debtor desires to sell the property under terms and conditions
of the Debtor's and Purchaser's Purchase and Sale Agreement
("Agreement").

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Jackson_Masonry_237_Sales.pdf

The Terms of the Agreement are summarized as follows:

   a. Purchase Price: $475,000

   b. Earnest Money: $5,000

   c. Closing Date: Oct. 15, 2016

   d. Brokers' Commission: The Wilson Group ("Broker"), whose
retention as exclusive broker for the sale of the property was
approved by the Court on June 13, 2016, will be paid a 3%
commission on the purchase price.

The Debtor further requests the authority to use the proceeds from
the sale of the property to pay at closing (i) the lien of the
Lender; (ii) any other claims that constitute liens on the
property; and (iii) allowed commissions to Brokers.

The Debtor has determined in its business judgment that a sale of
the property is in the best interest of creditors and the estate.
The offer is the highest and best offer for the property presented
to the Debtor.

                      About Jackson Masonry

Jackson Masonry, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 16-02065) on March 24,
2016.  The petition was signed by Rogers Jackson, member.

The Debtor is represented by Griffin S. Dunham, Esq., at Dunham
Hildebrand, PLLC.  The case is assigned to Judge Keith M. Lundin.

The Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million.



JACOB KOBY KHAKSHOURI: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Richard M. Neiter of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California approved the Amended Fourth Amended
Disclosure Statement explaining Jacob Koby Khakshouri's Fourth
Amended Plan.

Both the Lender and U.S. Trustee filed limited objections to the
Disclosure Statement.  At the hearing, Gary E. Klausner, Esq. --
gek@lnbyb.com -- of Levene Neale Bender Yoo & Brill, who represents
the Lender, indicated that the negotiated changes in the Disclosure
Statement were satisfactory to the Lender and resolved all of the
Lender's objections.  Kenneth Lau, who appeared on behalf of the
U.S. Trustee, stated that the U.S. Trustee was satisfied with the
changes in the Disclosure Statement and had no further objections.
Carolyn Dee appeared on behalf of Sam Leslie, Examiner.

The Court advised the parties that this case would be assigned to a
new judge, and the parties would have to confer with the new judge
regarding, among other things, obtaining a hearing date for
confirmation of the Debtor's Amended Fourth Amended Plan.

Based upon the Court's review of the records, pleadings, and papers
on file, the statements of counsel regarding the resolution of any
objections to the Motion, and for good cause shown, the Debtor's
Motion to Approve the Disclosure Statement is granted, and the
Amended Fourth Amended Disclosure Statement is approved.

The bankruptcy case is In re: JACOB KOBY KHAKSHOURI, Case No.
2:14-bk-14592-RN (Bankr. C.D. Calif.).

The Debtor is represented by:

     Alan F. Broidy, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF ALAN F. BROIDY, APC
     1925 Century Park East, 17th Floor
     Los Angeles, CA 90067
     Phone: (310) 286-6601
     Fax: (310) 286-6610
     Email: alan@broidylaw.com


JAMES ALFORD: Plan Confirmation Hearing on Oct. 25
--------------------------------------------------
Judge Edward Ellington of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Mississippi approved the disclosure statement
explaining James H. Alford, Jr.'s Plan of Reorganization and
scheduled a hearing on confirmation of the Plan for October 25,
2016, at 1:30 p.m.

The 12th day of October, 2016, is fixed as the last day for filing
objections to the confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization.

James Alford filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No.
11-30714) on April 26, 2011.




JAMES ANTHONY DEAL: Dec. 1 Plan Confirmation Hearing
----------------------------------------------------
Judge John S. Dalis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Georgia approved the disclosure statement explaining
James Anthony Deal and Margaret V. Deal's First Amended Chapter 11
Plan, and scheduled for December 1, 2016, at 10:30 AM, a hearing on
confirmation of the Plan and Discharge, if applicable.

November 23 is fixed as the last day for filing written acceptances
or rejections of the Plan.

The Debtors and their attorney must appear. In the event they fail
to appear, or if the plan is not confirmed at said hearing, a
hearing will thereupon be held to determine whether the case should
be dismissed or converted to Chapter 7.

The bankruptcy case is In re: James Anthony Deal and Margaret V.
Deal, Debtors, Case No. 14−50778−JSD (Bankr. S.D. Ga.).


JAMES EMERSON DAVIS: Court Overrules Objection to Claim #4
----------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned In re JAMES EMERSON DAVIS, Debtor(s), No.
16-10249 (Bankr. N.D. Calif.), Judge Alan Jaroslosky of the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California
overruled the Debtor's objection to Claim No. 4.

In 2006, the Debtor borrowed $461,000 from the First National Bank
of Arizona secured by his real property in Mendocino County. Claim
#4 in this case has been filed by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC,
as servicer of that loan. Davis challenges SLS's standing to assert
the claim, arguing that it has not provided evidence of any agency
or other relationship with the current holder of Davis' note, or
any evidence as to how it came into possession of the note.

Judge Jaroslosky held that in this case, SLS has established that
Fist National Bank of Arizona endorsed the note in favor of First
National Bank of Neveda, which endorsed the note in favor of
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., which endorsed the note in blank, and
that SLS now holds the note. SLS accordingly has standing to
enforce the note.

There is also no legal basis for Davis' argument that SLS must show
exactly how it came into possession of the note, Judge Jaroslosky
said.

A full-text copy of the Memorandum dated August 30, 2016 is
available at https://is.gd/0xahRD from Leagle.com.

James Emerson Davis, Debtor, is represented by Michael C. Fallon,
Esq. -- Law Offices of Michael C. Fallon.

Office of the U.S. Trustee/SR, U.S. Trustee, is represented by
Lynette C. Kelly, Office of the United States Trustee.


JEFF BENFIELD: Can Use Cash Collateral Until Sept. 21
-----------------------------------------------------
Judge J. Craig Whitley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of North Carolina authorized Jeff Benfield Nursery, Inc.,
to use cash collateral on an interim basis, until September 21,
2016.

The Debtor's approved monthly cash Budget provides for total
operating expenses in the amount of $326,679.

The Debtor's Lenders were granted valid, attached, choate,
enforceable, perfected and continuing security interests in, and
liens upon all the Debtor's postpetition assets of the same
character and type, to the same extent and validity as the liens
and encumbrances of the Lenders attached to the Debtor's assets
prepetition.

Judge Whitley made no ruling on the Internal Revenue Service's
request for the monthly payment of $9,366 as adequate protection,
opting to consider it further at the final hearing.

A final hearing on the use of cash collateral will be held on Sept.
21, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/BcrnNC

                   About Jeff Benfield Nursery

Jeff Benfield Nursery, Inc., filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
W.D.N.C. Case No. 09-40311) on April 17, 2009.  The petition was
signed by Jeffrey L. Benfield, president.  The Debtor is
represented by David G. Gray, Esq., at Westall, Gray, Connolly &
Davis, P.A.  The case is assigned to Judge George R. Hodges.  The
Debtor disclosed total assets at $9,428,325 and total liabilities
at $9,370,095.


KARLEE COMPANY: SSG Acted as Co-Investment Banker in Asset Sale
---------------------------------------------------------------
SSG Advisors, LLC, acted as the co-investment banker to KARLEE
Company, Inc., in the sale of substantially all of its assets to an
affiliate of Resilience Capital Partners.  The sale was effectuated
under UCC Article 9 and closed in August 2016.

KARLEE specializes in high complexity, close tolerance sheet metal
fabrication, machined parts and assemblies for the aerospace,
communications, commercial goods, defense and medical equipment
industries.  The Company offers customers a full range of services
from e-business to total supply chain management, prototyping and
concurrent engineering.

KARLEE had historically performed well, generating enough cash flow
to meet its debt service requirements.  However, in 2013, the
Company encountered issues during an ERP system conversion which
led to strained liquidity.  SSG was retained by KARLEE in March
2016 to evaluate strategic alternatives and conduct a comprehensive
marketing process to strategic and financial buyers in order to
structure the optimal solution for the Company.  Several parties
engaged in a thorough review of the business and submitted offers
for KARLEE.  Resilience's offer to acquire substantially all of
KARLEE's assets, as well as provide the appropriate capital going
forward, should allow KARLEE to reach its full growth potential.
SSG's experience in identifying buyers and running a thorough and
expedited sale process enabled key stakeholders to maximize value.

The acquisition of KARLEE will complement Resilience's portfolio
company, Porter's Group, LLC, a leading provider of metal
fabrication solutions serving the security, military, mining, heavy
equipment and trucking industries.  Porter's Group is also the
largest metal fabricator of ATMs in North America.  Based in
Cleveland, Ohio, Resilience invests in niche-oriented
manufacturing, value added distribution and business service
companies with sustainable market positions and clear paths to cash
flow improvement.

Other professionals who worked on the transaction include:

   -- Jay H. Krasoff and Scott W. Johnson of Chiron Financial, LLC,
co-investment banker to KARLEE Company, Inc.;

   -- John J. Kane and Jason B. Binford of Kane Russell Coleman &
Logan PC, counsel to KARLEE Company, Inc.;

   -- Bill Patterson, Chris Lang and Jon Daniels of Bridgepoint
Consulting, LLC, Chief Restructuring Officer and Financial Advisor
to KARLEE Company, Inc.;

   -- Melissa S. Hayward of Franklin Hayward LLP, counsel to the
KARLEE Company, Inc. equity holders;

   -- Nicholas S. Pappas of Bruner & Pappas, L.L.P., counsel to
Southside Bank;

   -- Daniel C. Garner of Hunton & Williams LLP, counsel to Triumph
Commercial Finance; and

   -- William R. Stewart, Jr., Ari M. Friedman, Catherine E. Arney,
Jennifer M. Hayes, Christopher M. Matgouranis, Todd R. Miller and
Mark D. Tupa, Jr. of Jones Day, counsel to Resilience Capital
Partners.

                    About SSG Capital Advisors

SSG Capital Advisors is an independent boutique investment bank
that assists middle-market companies and their stakeholders in
completing special situation transactions.  It provides its clients
with investment banking services in the areas of mergers and
acquisitions, private placements, financial restructurings,
valuations, litigation and strategic advisory.


KEMET CORP: Unit Winds Down KFM's Operations
--------------------------------------------
KEMET Electronics Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of KEMET
Corporation, made the decision on Aug. 31, 2016, to wind down
operations of its wholly-owned subsidiary, KEMET Foil
Manufacturing, LLC.  Operations at KFM's Knoxville, Tennessee plant
are expected to end as of Oct. 31, 2016.

KFM supplies formed foil to the Company's Film & Electrolytic
Business Group, as well as to certain third party customers.  The
Company anticipates that FEBG will achieve significant raw material
cost savings by purchasing its formed foil from suppliers that have
the advantage of lower utility costs.  The Company expects to
achieve annual cost savings related to these actions of
approximately $2.5 to $3.0 million beginning in the third quarter
of fiscal year 2017.

The Company said this action will result in a pre-tax charge during
the second fiscal quarter ending Sept. 30, 2016, of $6.0 to $9.1
million relating to the wind down consisting of a non-cash
impairment charge of approximately $5.0 to $5.6 million; cash
severance charges of $0.5 million for approximately 20 employees;
and anticipated cash charges for contract termination costs in the
range of $0.5 to $3.0 million.

                          About KEMET

KEMET, based in Greenville, South Carolina, is a manufacturer and
supplier of passive electronic components, specializing in
tantalum, multilayer ceramic, film, solid aluminum, electrolytic,
and paper capacitors.  KEMET's common stock is listed on the NYSE
under the symbol "KEM."

KEMET reported a net loss of $53.6 million on $735 million of net
sales for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, compared to a net
loss of $14.1 million on $823 million of net sales for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2015.

As of June 30, 2016, Kemet had $671 million in total assets, $583
million in total liabilities and $88.4 million in total
stockholders' equity.

                           *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on March 26, 2013, Moody's Investors
Service downgraded KEMET Corp.'s Corporate Family Rating to 'Caa1'
from 'B2' and the Probability of Default Rating to 'Caa1-PD' from
'B2- PD' based on Moody's expectation that KEMET's liquidity will
be pressured by maturing liabilities and negative free cash flow
due to the interest burden and continued operating losses at the
Film and Electrolytic segment.

As reported by the TCR on Aug. 9, 2013, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services lowered its corporate credit rating on KEMET to 'B-' from
'B+'.  "The downgrade is based on continued top-line and margin
pressures and lagging results from the restructuring of the Film &
Electrolytic [F&E] business, which combined with cyclical weak
end-market demand, has resulted in sustained, elevated leverage
well in excess of 5x, persistent negative FOCF, and diminishing
liquidity," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Alfred
Bonfantini.

The TCR reported in August 2014 that S&P revised its outlook on
KEMET to 'stable' from 'negative'.  S&P affirmed the ratings,
including the 'B-' corporate credit rating.


KIDS ONLY II OF LAFAYETTE: Objects to RREF Disclosures, Ch. 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kids Only II of Lafayette, LLC, objects to the disclosure statement
explaining the Chapter 11 plan of liquidation proposed by RREF
PEBP-LA, LLC, complaining, among other things, that the Disclosure
Statement omitted the following information:

   -- claim amount listed for RREF;
   -- valuation for the daycare as a going concern or as real
estate;
   -- estimates for unsecured creditors; and
   -- definition of "Accelerated Marketing Plan."

Moreover, the Debtor complains that the RREF Plan provides for the
liquidation through an auction of the assets of the Debtor in a
time period of less than 45 days.  That procedure favors the
interests of RREF as first mortgage holder over other creditors and
the equity interests, the Debtor's counsel, Tom St. Germain, Esq.,
at Weinstein & St. Germain, LLC, in Lafayette, Louisiana, asserts.
Since the Debtor's daycare has the most value as a going concern,
the auction of the daycare in less than 45 days, especially if the
sale is to be for real estate only, will likely not produce
sufficient funds to pay all creditors and may not even be enough to
pay RREF's claim in full, Mr. St. Germain further asserts.

The U.S. bankruptcy court will hold a hearing on September 13 to
consider approval of the Chapter 11 Plan.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana
will hold the hearing at 10:00 a.m., at the Bankruptcy Court,
Suite
100, 214 Jefferson Street, Lafayette, Louisiana.

The court will also consider at the hearing the final approval of
the disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved on
August 8.

The court order set a September 6 deadline for creditors to cast
their votes and file their objections.  

Under the proposed plan, all creditors are expected to receive
100%
of their allowed claims.

                About Kids Only II of Lafayette

Kids Only II of Lafayette, LLC, and Kids Only III of Lafayette,
LLC, provide childcare services.  

Kids Only II of Lafayette, LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 15-51354) on October 20, 2015.
Kids Only III of Lafayette, LLC, filed a separate Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 15-51355) on October 20, 2015.
Both Debtors are represented by Thomas E. St. Germain, Esq., at
Weinstein & St. Germain, LLC, in Lafayette, Louisiana.

RREF II PEBP-LA, LLC, a secured creditor, is represented by Laura
F. Ashley, Esq., at Jones Walker LLP, in New Orleans, Louisiana.


KIDS ONLY III OF LAFAYETTE: Objects to RREF-Proposed Ch. 11 Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kids Only III of Lafayette, LLC, objects to the disclosure
statement explaining the Chapter 11 plan of liquidation proposed by
RREF PEBP-LA, LLC, complaining, among other things, that the
Disclosure Statement omitted the following information:

   -- claim amount listed for RREF;
   -- valuation for the daycare as a going concern or as real
estate;
   -- estimates for unsecured creditors; and
   -- definition of "Accelerated Marketing Plan."

Moreover, the Debtor complains that the RREF Plan provides for the
liquidation through an auction of the assets of the Debtor in a
time period of less than 45 days.  That procedure favors the
interests of RREF as first mortgage holder over other creditors and
the equity interests, the Debtor's counsel, Tom St. Germain, Esq.,
at Weinstein & St. Germain, LLC, in Lafayette, Louisiana, asserts.
Since the Debtor's daycare has the most value as a going concern,
the auction of the daycare in less than 45 days, especially if the
sale is to be for real estate only, will likely not produce
sufficient funds to pay all creditors and may not even be enough to
pay RREF's claim in full, Mr. St. Germain further asserts.

Mr. Germain also points out that the RREF Plan provides for a flat
fee of $15,000 to be paid to auctioneer's attorney.  This amount,
he says, appears excessive for what appears to be only a few
thousand dollars' worth of work.  The Auctioneer's attorney should
be compelled to file a fee application for work performed on behalf
of the estate.

Under the RREF Plan, all creditors are expected to receive 100% of
their allowed claims.  The following lists all classes containing
Debtors secured prepetition claims and their proposed treatment
under the Plan:

The holders of Class 5 general unsecured claims will receive
expected distributions under the Plan of 100% of their allowed
claims. The Court will set a claims bar date prior to the closing
of the sale of the 700 Property and 224 Property, and all these
claims will be paid pro rata at the closing, unless an objection
has been filed to such claims.  In the event that there are any
disputed claims at such time, cash equivalent to the pro rata
amount of such claim shall be placed in escrow, and shall be
distributed upon the adjudication of such claim.  

The Plan will be funded by the liquidation of the 700 Property and
224 Property.

Lamar P. Fisher and Fisher Auction Company together with a
headquarter broker of the Auctioneer's choosing shall implement
an extensive Accelerated Marketing Plan to advertise the sale of
the 700 Property and 224 Property to conduct the Auction sale. The
Auction shall take place at the 700 Property on October 27, 2016.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb15-51354-85.pdf

          About Kids Only III

Kids Only III of Lafayette, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 15-51355) on October 20, 2015.
The
Debtor tapped Thomas E. St. Germain, Esq. of Weinstein Law Firm
as
its counsel.

RREF II PEBP-LA, LLC, is represented by Laura F. Ashley, Esq., at
Jones Walker LLP, in New Orleans, Louisiana.


LAW-DEN NURSING: Repair Ongoing, 1st PCO Report Says
----------------------------------------------------
Deborah L. Fish, as the Patient Care Ombudsman appointed for
Law-Den Nursing Home, Inc., has issued a First Report for the
period of September 1, 2016 to September 6, 2016.

The Ombudsman observed that the Debtor has continued the same
quality of care post-petition as it did pre-petition. The PCO finds
no issue within the facility, the residents' personal care, and the
supplies.

As regards security, the PCO reported that one of the facility's
third floor doors is currently being repaired. The PCO directs the
Debtor to advise when the repair has been completed.

       About Law-Den Nursing Home

Law-Den Nursing Home, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
Mich. Case No. 16-52058) on August 30, 2016, and is represented by
Clinton J. Hubbell, Esq., at Hubbell Duvall PLLC, in Southfield,
Michigan.  At the time of its filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of $0 to $50,000 and estimated liabilities of $1 million to
$10 million.  The petition was signed by Todd Johnson,
administrator.


LBJ HEALTHCARE: Care Within Standards, PCO 2nd Report Says
----------------------------------------------------------
Constance Doyle, as the Patient Care Ombudsman for LBJ Healthcare
Partners Inc., filed a Second Interim Report for the period of July
1, 2016, through August 31, 2016.

The Patient Care Ombudsman finds that all care provided to the
residents/clients by LBJ Healthcare Inc., at the Villa Luren
Resident Home is within the standard of care.

The Ombudsman observes that there is no change in staff, structure,
and physician coverage within the adult residential facility.
Residents are self-sufficient and no issues observed or reported
for the two-month period.

Headquartered in Whittier, Calif., LBJ Healthcare Partners Inc.,
fdba Bayshore Villa Healthcare Partners, Inc., aw Brian Buenviaje,
aw Rosalinda Buenviaje, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-15197) on April 21, 2016, with
$49,370 in estimated total assets and $1.27 million in estimated
total liabilities. The petition was signed by Brian Buenviaje,
president and CEO. Judge Vincent P. Zurzolo presides over the case.
Robert M. Aronson, Esq., at the Law Office of Robert M. Aronson,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


LDI MANAGEMENT: Can Use IRS Cash Collateral on Final Basis
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Bill Parker of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Texas authorized LDI Management, Inc., to use the
Internal Revenue Service's cash collateral on a final basis.

The Debtor previously sought to use cash collateral through July
31, 2017, and asserted that the use of cash collateral was
necessary for it to continue to operate its business.  The Debtor
further asserted that without the use of cash collateral, it will
not be able to pay postpetition operating expenses and obtain
services needed to carry on its business in a manner that will
avoid irreparable harm to the Debtor's estate.

The Internal Revenue Service previously contended that the Debtor
was indebted for 940 and 941 taxes for periods ending September
2014 through September 2015, with the unpaid balance of $201,292.

The IRS was granted replacement liens co-extensive with its
prepetition liens, in all currently owned or after-acquired
property and assets of the Debtor, of the same kind that the IRS
had prepetition.

The approved Monthly Cash Collateral Budget provided for total
payroll in the amount of $66,940 and total expenses in the amount
of $9,701.

A full-text copy of the Final Order, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/SJbihk

                   About LDI Management

LDI Management, Inc., filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex.
Case No. 16-60485-11) on Aug. 4, 2016.  The Debtor is represented
by Mark A. Castillo, Esq., Joshua L. Shepherd, Esq., and Bryan C.
Assink, at Curtis Castillo PC.

The Debtor provides medical services to certain residents of The
Linderian Company, Ltd., which operates a skilled nursing facility
in Longview, Texas by the name of Summer Meadows.


LEO MOTORS: Equity Ownership in LGM Down to 81.8%
-------------------------------------------------
LGM Co. Ltd., a subsidiary of Leo Motors, Inc., entered into
securities purchase agreements with accredited investors, pursuant
to which LGM increased its capital to 5,233,732,500 Korean Won
(KRW) (approximately $4,736,400 U.S. Dollars) through the sale of
equity securities.  As a result of the sale, the Company's equity
ownership percentage in LGM decreased from 99.3% to 81.8%, as
disclosed in a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

                        About Leo Motors

Headquartered in Hanam City, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea, Leo
Motors, Inc., a Nevada corporation, is currently engaged in the
research and development of multiple products, prototypes and
conceptualizations based on proprietary, patented and patent
pending electric power generation, drive train and storage
technologies.

In 2011, the Company determined its investment in Leo B&T Inc. an
investment account was impaired and recorded an expense of
$4.5 million.  During the 2012 year the Company had a net non
operating income largely from the result of the forgiveness of
debt for $1.3 million.

Leo Motors reported a net loss of US$4.49 million on US$4.29
million of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a
net loss of US$4.48 million on US$693,000 of revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, Leo Motors had US$7.42 million in total
assets, US$6.1 million in total liabilities and US$1.30 million in
total equity.


LIFE PARTNERS: Locke Lord Should be DQ'd, Vida Says
---------------------------------------------------
Kali Hays, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reported that Life
Partners Holdings' financier and asset adviser Vida Capital has
demanded that Locke Lord LLP be disqualified as counsel to a third
party in Life Partners' ongoing bankruptcy.  Vida tells a Texas
court that the firm is conflicted as counsel to Vida in other
matters.  Vida says the firm acted as counsel to Transparency
Alliance LLC, an affiliate of BroadRiver Asset Management LP and a
creditor in Life Partners' Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and has a clear
conflict of interest.

                    About Life Partners Holdings

Headquartered in Waco, Texas, Life Partners Holdings, Inc. --
http://www.lphi.com/-- is the parent company engaged in the  
secondary market for life insurance, commonly called "life
settlements."  Since its incorporation in 1991, Life Partners,
Inc., has completed over 162,000 transactions for its worldwide
client base of over 30,000 high net worth individuals and
institutions in connection with the purchase of over 6,500
policies totaling over $3.2 billion in face value.

LPHI is a publicly traded company incorporated in Texas and its
common stock has been delisted from the NASDAQ (formerly trading
under the symbol LPHI).

Life Partners Holdings sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 15-40289) on Jan. 20,
2015.

The case is assigned to Judge Russell F. Nelms.  J. Robert
Forshey, Esq., at Forshey & Prostok, LLP, serves as counsel to the
Debtor.

LPHI disclosed $2,406,137 in assets and $52,722,308 in liabilities
as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
tapped Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., as counsel.

Tracy A. Bolt of BDO USA, LLP was named as examiner for the
Debtor's case.  At the behest of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, the U.S. Trustee, and the Creditors Committee, the
Court ordered the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee.  On March
13, 2015, H. Thomas Moran II was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee
in LPHI's case.  The trustee is represented by Thompson & Knight
LLP.

The Chapter 11 trustee signed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions for
LPHI's subsidiaries on May 19, 2015: Life Partners Inc. (Case No.
15-41995) and LPI Financial Services, Inc. (Case No. 15-41996).

Life Partners is estimated to have $100 million to $500 million in
assets and more than $1 billion in debt.  LPI Financial estimated
less than $50,000.


LIZA HAZAN: Amended Plan Proposes 41%-100% Recovery for Unsecureds
------------------------------------------------------------------
Liza Hazan filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida an amended disclosure statement that proposes
that unsecured creditors holding allowed claims will receive
distributions which the Debtor has valued at dividend of 41% to
100% of total allowed claims accrued for up to 60 months and paid
every six months with the first payment due in month six, while
undisputed unsecured claims are paid 100% within two years of the
petition date, or by Jan. 11, 2018.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated Sept. 6,
2016, is available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/15-56723-81.pdf

Liza Hazan  filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case No. 16-10389) on Jan. 11, 2016, and is represented by
Joel M. Aresty, Esq., in North Miami, Florida.


LONG-DEI LIU: No Issues for July-August, 2nd PCO Report Says
------------------------------------------------------------
Constance Doyle, as the Patient Care Ombudsman for Long-Dei Liu,
has issued a Second Interim Report for the period of July 1, 2016
through August 31, 2016.

The Patient Care Ombudsman finds that all care provided to the
patients by Long-Dei Liu, M.D. is well within the standard of
care.

Dr. Liu is affiliated with two hospitals (Fountain Valley and South
Coast Global in Santa Ana) where all his deliveries in the practice
of Obstetrics and Gynecology occur. On July 2016, Dr. Liu reported
that business is slow but he is still doing deliveries at the two
hospitals he is associated.

The PCO noted that there are no issues identified. There are no
changes in staff, no equipment issues, cleanliness is maintained
and the atmosphere is welcoming.

            About Long-Dei Liu

Orange, Calif.-based Long-Dei Liu filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-11588).  Judge Theodor
Albert presides over the case.  Long-Dei Liu, MD, is a single
practitioner who has practiced obstetrics and gynecology since
1981.


LUCAS ENERGY: Alan Dreeben Holds 11.6% Stake as of Aug. 25
----------------------------------------------------------
Alan W. Dreeben disclosed in a Schedule 13D filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission that as of Sept. 1, 2016, he
beneficially owns in aggregate 1,795,634 shares of common stock of
Lucas Energy, Inc., representing 11.6% of the 15,449,206 shares of
the Company's issued and outstanding Common Stock on that date as
confirmed by the Company's Transfer Agent.

Mr. Dreeben is partner/director of Republic National Distributing
Company, a wholesale beverage alcohol distributor.  Mr. Dreeben was
appointed as a member of the Board of Directors of Lucas Energy on
Aug. 26, 2016.

Effective Aug. 25, 2016, the Company closed the transactions
contemplated by that certain Asset Purchase Agreement, entered into
between the Company and twenty-three sellers, including Mr.
Dreeben, as a seller, and Segundo Resources, LLC, as a seller and
as a representative of the Sellers named therein, dated Dec. 31,
2015.  Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired
working interests in producing properties and undeveloped acreage
in Texas and Oklahoma, including varied interests in two largely
contiguous acreage blocks in the liquids-rich Mid-Continent region
of the United States, and related wells, leases, records, equipment
and agreements associated therewith.  In consideration for the
purchase of the Assets, the Company assumed approximately $30.6
million of commercial bank debt, issued the Sellers (a) 552,000
shares of Series B Redeemable Preferred Stock (convertible into
3,941,280 shares of Common Stock, the "Series B Preferred Stock"))
and (b) 13,009,664 shares of restricted Common Stock (of which
1,780,634 shares were issued to Mr. Dreeben); and (ii) paid the
Sellers $4,975,000 in cash.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                     https://is.gd/pJTvf9

                      About Lucas Energy

Based in Houston, Texas, Lucas Energy (NYSE MKT: LEI) --
http://www.lucasenergy.com/-- is a growth-oriented, independent
oil and gas company engaged in the development of crude oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids in the Hunton formation in
Central Oklahoma in addition to the Austin Chalk and Eagle Ford
formations in South Texas.

Lucas Energy reported a net loss of $25.4 million for the year
ended March 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $5.12 million for
the year ended March 31, 2015.

As of June 30, 2016, Lucas Energy had $14.73 million in total
assets, $12.91 million in total liabilities and $1.82 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Hein & Associates LLP, in Houston, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2016, citing that the Company has incurred
significant losses from operations and had a working capital
deficit of $9.6 million at March 31, 2015.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


LUCAS ENERGY: Ilios Oil Reports 9.2% Equity Stake as of Aug. 25
---------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Ilios Oil, LLC and Mr. John Benjamin Azar, the manager
and sole owner of Ilios LLC, disclosed that as of Aug. 25, 2016,
they beneficially own 1,425,099 shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value per share, of Lucas Energy, Inc., representing 9.2 percent of
the shares outstanding.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing
is available for free at https://is.gd/yXc7Uf

                       About Lucas Energy

Based in Houston, Texas, Lucas Energy (NYSE MKT: LEI) --
http://www.lucasenergy.com/-- is a growth-oriented, independent
oil and gas company engaged in the development of crude oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids in the Hunton formation in
Central Oklahoma in addition to the Austin Chalk and Eagle Ford
formations in South Texas.

Lucas Energy reported a net loss of $25.4 million for the year
ended March 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $5.12 million for
the year ended March 31, 2015.

As of June 30, 2016, Lucas Energy had $14.73 million in total
assets, $12.91 million in total liabilities and $1.82 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Hein & Associates LLP, in Houston, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2016, citing that the Company has incurred
significant losses from operations and had a working capital
deficit of $9.6 million at March 31, 2015.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


LUCAS ENERGY: Scott Lake, et al., Hold 5.3% Stake as of Aug. 25
---------------------------------------------------------------
Scott Lake Energy, L.P., Scott Lake Energy, LLC, and Donald Rowden
disclosed that as of Aug. 25, 2016, they beneficially own 820,968
shares of common stock of Lucas Energy, Inc., representing 5.3
percent of the shares outstanding.  A full-text copy of the
regulatory filing is available at https://is.gd/juHxk3

                      About Lucas Energy

Based in Houston, Texas, Lucas Energy (NYSE MKT: LEI) --
http://www.lucasenergy.com/-- is a growth-oriented, independent
oil and gas company engaged in the development of crude oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids in the Hunton formation in
Central Oklahoma in addition to the Austin Chalk and Eagle Ford
formations in South Texas.

Lucas Energy reported a net loss of $25.4 million for the year
ended March 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $5.12 million for
the year ended March 31, 2015.

As of June 30, 2016, Lucas Energy had $14.73 million in total
assets, $12.91 million in total liabilities and $1.82 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Hein & Associates LLP, in Houston, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2016, citing that the Company has incurred
significant losses from operations and had a working capital
deficit of $9.6 million at March 31, 2015.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


LUSIGNAN SECURITY: Has Until Nov. 3 to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christopher J. Panos of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts authorized Lusignan Security Agency,
Inc., to use cash collateral through Nov. 3, 2016.

The approved Budget covers the months of September 2016 and October
2016, and provides for total expenses in the amount of $121,350 for
September 2016 and $100,750 for October 2016.

Judge Panos held that the Internal Revenue Service will retain its
lien on the Debtor's property, as security for the Debtor's
obligation to the IRS.  The IRS was also granted a continuing
post-petition security interest in the Debtor's assets and all
their substitutions after the Petition Date, to the extent of any
diminution in the value of the prepetition property.

The Debtor was directed to, among other things, make monthly
adequate protection payments to the IRS in the amount of $5,150,
until such time as the Debtor's plan of reorganization is confirmed
or a superseding Order is issued.

The Debtor has until Oct. 21, 2016, 4:30 p.m., to file an amended
cash use budget, a form of proposed order, and any other submission
in support of a request for continued use of cash collateral beyond
Nov. 3, 2016.

A further hearing on the continued use of cash collateral is
scheduled on Nov. 3, 2016 at 10:45 a.m.  The deadline for the
filing of objections to the Debtor's continued use of cash
collateral is set on Oct. 31, 2016 at 4:30 p.m.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is available at
https://is.gd/Mbj9Yx

                 About Lusignan Security Agency

Lusignan Security Agency Inc. filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 16-40065) on January 21, 2016.  The petition is
signed by William F. Lusignan, president.  The Debtor is
represented by James P. Ehrhard, Esq., at Ehrhard & Associates,
P.C.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $0 to $50,000
at the time of the filing.


MAGNESIUM CORP: District Court Won't Halt $26.2M Sale
-----------------------------------------------------
Martin O'Sullivan, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reported that a
New York federal district judge has declined to freeze the sale of
a stake held by Magnesium Corp. of America's court-appointed
trustee in a $213 million judgment against Renco Group Inc. and its
owner over allegations that they drove the magnesium producer into
bankruptcy in 2001.  U.S. District Judge Denise Cote denied an
emergency motion by a group of Renco noteholders seeking to stay an
August order by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil approving
the $26.2 million sale.

                         About MagCorp

Magnesium Corporation of America, a unit of Renco Group Inc., was
the largest single producer of magnesium in the United States.
The
Company filed for chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
01-14312) on Aug. 2, 2001.  The Debtors sold substantially all of
their assets to U.S. Magnesium, LLC, in an 11 U.S.C. Sec. 363 asset

sale transaction.  Judge Robert Gerber ordered the case converted
to
a chapter 7 liquidation on Sept. 24, 2003.  When the Company filed
for Chapter 11 protection from its creditors, it listed debts and
assets of more than $100 million.

Lee E. Buchwald is the Chapter 7 trustee.  He is represented by
Nicholas F. Kajon, Esq., at Stevens & Lee, P.C.


MARK DEQUESNAY: Oct. 13 Plan Confirmation Hearing
-------------------------------------------------
Judge K. Rodney May of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida issued an order conditionally approving the
disclosure statement explaining Mark A. deQuesnay and Rosalind T.
deQuesnay's Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

Any written objections to the Disclosure Statement must be filed no
later than seven days prior to the date of the hearing on
confirmation.  If no objections are filed within the time fixed,
the conditional approval of the Disclosure Statement will become
final.  Any objections or requests to modify the Disclosure
Statement will be considered at the Confirmation Hearing.

The court will conduct a hearing on confirmation of the Plan,
including timely filed objections to confirmation, objections to
the disclosure statement, motions for cramdown, applications for
compensation, and motions for allowance of administrative claims on
October 13, 2016, at 11:00 a.m.

An election of application of Bankruptcy Code Section 1111(b)(2) by
a class of secured creditors may be made at any time prior to the
conclusion of the Confirmation Hearing. The hearing may be
adjourned from time to time by announcement made in open court
without further notice. If the Plan is not confirmed, the court
will also consider dismissal or conversion of the case.

At the hearing, in a small business case, the debtor may seek to
extend the time for confirmation of the plan, pursuant to the
provisions of 11 U.S.C. Section 1121(e).

Parties in interest must submit their written ballot accepting or
rejecting the Plan no later than eight days before the date of the
Confirmation

Objections to confirmation must be filed with the court no later
than seven days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

The Debtor must file a ballot tabulation no later than three days
before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

All creditors and parties in interest that assert a claim against
the Debtor, which arose after the filing of the Chapter 11 case,
including all professionals seeking compensation from the estate of
the Debtor pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 330, must file
motions or applications for the allowance of those claims with the
court no later than fourteen days after the entry of this order.
Applications for payment of administrative expenses will be heard
at same date and time as the Confirmation Hearing if the applicant
has served notice of the hearing on the application (expressly
stating the total amount requested) on all creditors at least 21
days before the hearing.

Three days prior to the Confirmation Hearing, the Debtor must file
a confirmation affidavit which will contain the factual basis upon
which the Debtor relies in establishing that each of the
requirements of Bankruptcy Code Section 1129 are met.

The bankruptcy case is In re In re: Mark A duQuesnay and Rosalind
T. duQuesnay, Debtors, Case No. 8:15-bk-9705-KRM (Bankr. M.D.
Fla.).


MARVIN FLICKER: Sale of Camono Property for $1.2M Approved
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Marc Barreca of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Washington authorized Marvin Flickner, doing business
as Elger Grocery Bay, and Laurie Flickner to sell Elger Bay Grocery
and real property located at 1992 South Elger Bay Road, Camano
Island, Washington, tax parcel numbers R33130-027-4100/806397 and
C600 282 829 002/556918 for $1,189,000.

The Debtors may sell the Properties, and that all claims filed in
the chapter 11 case and classes 1, 2, 3, and 4 will be paid in
full. Closing costs, fees and commissions can be ordered to be paid
out of the financing funds. The secured creditor will be paid in
full or for such other relief as the court deems proper. After all
that is stated is paid through closing, the Debtor will be paid the
balance of the proceeds as stated upon the final settlement
statement.

The 10-day stay provision pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 4001(a)(3) is
waived.

Counsel for the Debtors:

          Riley D. Lee, Esq.
          3325 Smokey Pint Drive, #103A
          Arlington, WA 98223
          Telephone: (360) 658-7575
          Facsimile: (360) 658-2599


MCGEE EQUIPMENT: Western Objects to Treatment of Claim Under Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Western Equipment Finance, Inc., objects to McGee Equipment Rental
and Sales, Inc.'s plan and disclosure statement, complaining that
the Plan needs to address the possibility of a non-dischargeable
debt owed to Western and provide for full payment of the same.

In the section of the Plan detailing treatment for the various
classes of creditor claims, Western's claim treatment is detailed
under "Class 5: Disputed Claims" as follows:

   Claim of Western Equipment Finance, Inc. The claim filed by
Western Equipment Finance, Inc., claim 33, is filed as secured for
$78,952.29. The Debtor's intent was to surrender the collateral
which consist of welding machines.  Several of the welding machines
are missing, lost or misplaced.  The claim filed is the amount due
after surrender of the collateral. An adversarial complaint has
been filed, 16-05003, by Western Equipment Finance, Inc. The Debtor
will treat the claim as a general unsecured claim regardless of the
outcome of the adversarial.

Western filed an adversary action against the Debtor on February
12, 2016. The relief requested in the Complaint is for a
non-dischargeable Judgment in the amount of $78,952.29 for
conversion of Western's collateral.

According to Western, the current proposed plan treatment of "[t]he
Debtor will treat the claim as a general unsecured claim regardless
of the outcome of the adversarial" is unacceptable and violates the
provisions of Title 11 Chapter 11 United States Code.

Accordingly, Western asks that the Debtor's First Amended Plan and
Disclosure Statement not be approved in its present form.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the Debtor's
First Amended Plan and Disclosure Statement dated Aug. 8, 2016,
provide that allowed unsecured claims will share on a pro rata
basis distributions totaling $60,000, which will be paid on a
quarterly basis beginning the end of the first quarter after
confirmation.  Quarterly payments will be $3,000 per quarter.

The Debtor has received a Deep Water Horizon settlement; net
settlement proceeds to the Debtor is $250,000.  The Debtor will
use
the proceeds from the Deep Water Horizon claim to apply directly
to
priority claims -- totaling $455,887 -- which payment will be made
within 30 days of confirmation of the plan. The payment from the
Deep Water Horizon settlement is not sufficient to pay priority
claims in full and the Debtor will then pay priority claims as per
the provisions outlined in the Plan.

A copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb15-51380-0276.pdf

Western is represented by:

     Anton L. Hasenkampf, Esq.
     Craig Cousins, Esq.
     Patrick M. Wartelle, Esq.
     Leake & Andersson, LLP
     1100 Poydras Street, Suite 1700
     New Orleans, LA 70163-1701
     Tel: (504) 585-7500
     Fax: (504) 585-7775
     Email: ccousins@leakeandersson.com
            ahasenkampf@leakeandersson.com
            pwartelle@leakeandersson.com

                    About McGee Equipment

McGee Equipment Rental & Sales, Inc. sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No.
15-51380) on Oct. 23, 2015.  The petition was signed by Jacob
Jarrell Lacour, controller and general manager.  

The company is in the business of equipment rental and sales.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $3.58 million in
assets and $3.91 million in liabilities.

The Debtor is represented by William C. Vidrine, Esq., at Vidrine &
Vidrine, PLLC, in Lafayette, Louisiana.


MDI CREATIVE: To Sell Millwork, Furniture Units to Fund Ch. 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MDI Creative, Inc.'s Amended Disclosure Statement, dated Sept. 6,
2016, proposes to pay Class 4 Creditors (Unsecured Tax Claims) and
Class 5 Creditors (all allowed General Unsecured Claims) in full
out of the closing proceeds of sale of its millwork and furniture
division and museum contracts at the end of a 12-month period.

The company is a full service design and build millwork firm for
commercial and museum uses.  It has provided services and product
to such entities as Chickamauga National Battlefield, National
Infantry Museum, Greater Atlanta Christian Academy, Life
University, Caribou Coffee, Martin Luther King Museum, Suntrust
Bank, Nationsbank, Lucent Technologies, Cox Communications and the
University of Georgia.

The Debtor anticipates that the sale of the millwork/furniture
aspect of its business will be in the range of $2,000,000 to
$2,500,000.  The Debtor also anticipates that the sale of museum
contracts will generate sales proceeds in the range of
$10,000,000.

In the event the Debtor is unable to sell its assets and pay off
creditors in full by the end of the twelve-month period, Debtor
will cease operations and auction or otherwise sell off all its
assets that can be sold (tangible personal property such as
equipment and inventory) and net proceeds will be paid over to the
Internal Revenue Service and Georgia Labor Department on a pro rata
basis.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at http://bankrupt.com/misc/15-56723-81.pdf

MDI Creative, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga.
Case No. 15-56723) on April 10, 2015, and is represented by George
M. Geeslin, Esq., in Atlanta, Georgia.  At the time of filing, the
Debtor's estimated assets is $0 to $50,000 and estimated
liabilities is $1 million to $10 million.  The petition was signed
by Pat Malone, CEO.  A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured
creditors is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb15-56723.pdf


METROPOLITAB BAPTIST: Sale of DC Condo Unit for $435K Approved
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge S. Martin Teel, Jr., of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Columbia authorized Metropolitan Baptist Church to sell
its condominium unit located at 1210 R Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C., outside the ordinary course of business to William B.
Fitzgerald for $435,000.

The sale is free and clear of any liens and interests.

At settlement, the Debtor is authorized and ordered to disburse up
to $425,000 of the proceeds from the sale of the property to the
Industrial Bank to the extent necessary to satisfy Industrial
Bank's lien.

             About Metropolitan Baptist Church

Headquartered in Largo, Maryland, Metropolitan Baptist Church is a
not-for-profit religious corporation, originally incorporated in
the District of Columbia in 1892.

Metropolitan Baptist Church sought the Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. D.C. Case No. 16-00040) on Feb. 5, 2016.  Judge Martin
S. Teel, Jr., presides over the case.

The Debtor estimated assets in the range of $1 million to $10
million and $10 million to $50 million.

Wendell W. Webster, Esq., at Webster & Fredrickson, PLLC, serves as
the Debtor's counsel.

The petition was signed by Harry T. Jones, Jr., Chair, Board of
Trustees.


MICHAEL JOSEPH KILROY: Disclosure Statement Hearing Oct. 5
----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Michael Joseph Kilroy on Oct. 5, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. will
seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California of the Disclosure Statement describing his
Plan Dated August 25, 2016.

Objections to approval of the Disclosure Statement are due 14 days
prior to the hearing.

The case is In re Michael Joseph Kilroy, Chapter 11, Debtor and
Debtor in Possession, Case No. 2:15-bk-15708-RK (Bankr. C.D.
Cal.).

Counsel for the Debtor is J.P Fritz, Esq., at Levene, Neale,
Bender, Yoo & Brill L.L.P., in Los Angeles, California.



MIX 1 LIFE: To Acquire 100% of BMP's Interest in Brand Assets
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mix 1 Life, Inc., and BrandMark Products, Inc., entered into an
amended Letter of Intent on Aug. 26, 2016, to acquire 100% of BMP's
interest in their brand assets, including all of BMP's distribution
and manufacturing contracts, for an aggregate purchase price of
10,000,000 restricted shares of common stock of the Company.  This
Amended LOI revises the original Letter of Intent filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 28, 2016.

BrandMark Products Inc. focuses on the purchase of licensing rights
of major brands.  The BrandMark business model is to build a
diverse portfolio of high quality, competitively priced food brands
with annualized target revenues between $25 million and $50 million
for "each brand" license.  The business strategy is 'Brand
Extension'.

The Company will purchase all rights to distribute and
commercialize the Brand Assets globally.  Closing of the Asset
Purchase Agreement is scheduled for Sept. 30, 2016.

A full-text copy of the Letter of Intent is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/i6i6TN

                        About Mix 1 Life

Mix 1 Life, Inc. (formerly Antaga International Corp) was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada, U.S. on June
10, 2009.  The Company's operations are based in Scottsdale,
Arizona.

On Aug. 27, 2013, Antaga International Corp. entered into a
Definitive Agreement with Mix1 LLC, an Arizona corporation, under
which the Company acquired 100% of certain assets owned by Mix in
exchange for 3,333,333, post reverse, newly issued shares of common
stock in the Company.

Mix 1 is an emerging beverage and nutritional supplements company
currently with a product line of natural, ready-to-drink protein
shakes.  The Company's shakes offer a complete and balanced
macronutrient mix and are intended to be consumed as a post work
out, snack replacement, meal supplement or a meal replacement.  Mix
1 beverages have a high protein content (on average 26 grams per
serving) and are unique due to their fruit-based flavors,
relatively low calorie count and superior taste.  The Company's
shakes have a twelve month shelf life with no need for
refrigeration and are currently served in a twelve ounce PET
(polyethylene terephthalate) bottle.

As of May 31, 2016, Mix 1 Life had $20.97 million in total assets,
$8.16 million in total liabilities and $12.81 million in total
shareholders' equity.

The Company reported a net loss of $17.7 million for the year ended
Aug. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $1.99 million for the year
ended Aug. 31, 2014.

KWCO, PC, in Odessa, TX, the Company's independent accounting firm,
issued a "going concern" qualification on the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Aug. 31, 2015, citing that
the Company's operating losses since inception raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


MOLYCORP INC: Has Court OK to Tap Excess Insurance Policy
---------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Montgomery, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reported that
Molycorp Inc. received a Delaware bankruptcy court's approval to
tap an excess insurance policy for settlement of a 4-year-old
Colorado putative class lawsuit targeting the company's stock sales
and allegedly inflated claims about production at its California
rare earth mine.

Scant details were available on the prospective settlement,
according to the report, but documents filed in Colorado federal
court said the parties in the case would file a motion for
preliminary approval of a settlement stipulation by Sept. 28.

                    About Molycorp, Inc.

Molycorp Inc. -- http://www.molycorp.com/-- is a global rare
earths and rare metals producer.  Molycorp owns several prominent
are earth processing facilities around the world.  It has a
workforce of 2,530 employees at locations on three continents.
Molycorp's Mountain Pass Rare Earth Facility in San Bernadino
County, California, is home to one of the world's largest and
richest deposits of rare earths.

Molycorp has corporate offices in the United States, Canada and
China.  CEO Geoffrey R. Bedford, and other senior management
members are located in Molycorp's corporate offices in Toronto,
Canada.  Other senior management members are located at its U.S.
corporate headquarters in Greenwood Village, Colorado.

Molycorp reported a net loss of $623 million in 2014, a net loss
of $377 million in 2013 and a net loss of $475 million in 2012.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $2.49 billion in total
assets, $1.78 billion in total liabilities and $709 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Molycorp and its North American subsidiaries, together with
certain of its non-operating subsidiaries outside of North
America, filed Chapter 11 voluntary petitions in Delaware (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-11357) on June 25, 2015, after reaching
agreement with a group of lenders on a financial restructuring.
The Chapter 11 cases of Molycorp and 20 affiliated debts are
pending before Judge Christopher S. Sontchi.

The agreement provides for a financial restructuring of the
Company's $1.7 billion in debt and provides up to $225 million in
gross proceeds in new financing to support operations while the
Company completes negotiations with creditors.

The Company's operations outside of North America, with the
exception of non-operating companies in Luxembourg and Barbados,
are excluded from the filings.  Molycorp Rare Metals (Oklahoma),
LLC, with operations in Quapaw, Oklahoma, also is excluded from
the filings as it is not 100% owned by the Company.

Molycorp is being advised by the investment banking firm of Miller
Buckfire & Co. and is receiving financial advice from
AlixPartners, LLP.  Jones Day and Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor

LLP act as legal counsel to the Company in this process. Prime
Clerk serves as claims and noticing agent.

Secured creditor Oaktree Capital Management L.P., consented to the
use of cash collateral and to extend postpetition financing.

On July 8, 2015, the U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case
of Molycorp Inc. appointed eight creditors of the company to serve
on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Creditors
Committee tapped Ashby & Geddes, P.A. and Paul Hastings LLP as
attorneys.

                          *     *     *

Molycorp, Inc.'s Fourth Joint Amended Plan of Reorganization has
been confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware.  The Plan contemplates two possible outcomes: (1) the
sale of substantially all of the Debtors' assets if certain
conditions set forth in the Plan are satisfied and (2) (a) the
sale of the assets associated with the Debtors' Mountain Pass
mining facility in San Bernardino County, California; and (b)
the stand-alone reorganization around the Debtors' other three
business units.

Judge Christopher Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware on April 8, 2016, issued a findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and order confirming the Fourth Amended Joint
Plan of Reorganization of Molycorp, Inc., and its debtor
affiliates.

On April 13, 2016, Judge Sontchi directed the appointment of a
Chapter 11 trustee to oversee the operations of Industrial
Minerals LLC, Molycorp Advance Water Technologies LLC, Molycorp
Minerals LLC, PP IV Mountain Pass II Inc., PP IV Mountain Pass
Inc., and RCF Speedwagon Inc.  Each of the bankruptcy cases of
the companies are no longer jointly administered with Molycorp's
case under Case No. 15-11357.

On May 2, 2016, the Court entered an order in the Molycorp
Minerals Debtors' cases approving the appointment of Paul E.
Harner as chapter 11 trustee for Molycorp Mineral Debtors'
bankruptcy estates.

On Aug. 31, 2016, Molycorp reported that its confirmed Fourth Joint
Amended Plan became effective as of that date.  Molycorp emerged
from Chapter 11 protection as a newly reorganized business, now
known as Neo Performance Materials.


MORGANS HOTEL: Amends Schedule 13E-3 Transaction Statement
----------------------------------------------------------
A fifth amendment to the 13E-3 transaction statement was filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on Sept. 7, 2016, jointly by
(i) Morgans Hotel Group Co., (ii) Trousdale Acquisition Sub, Inc.,
(iii) SBEEG Holdings, LLC, and (iv) Yucaipa Hospitality
Investments, LLC.

On Aug. 4, 2016, the Company filed with the SEC a definitive proxy
statement on Schedule 14A, regarding, among other things, a
proposal to adopt that certain Merger Agreement by and among the
Company, SBE and Merger Sub, dated as of May 9, 2016.

Concurrently with the filing of the Amendment No. 5, the Company
filed with the SEC certain additional Soliciting Material on
Schedule 14A which contain certain amendments to the Proxy
Statement.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                     https://is.gd/sXaEri

                  About Morgans Hotel Group

Based in New York, Morgans Hotel Group Co. (Nasdaq: MHGC) --
http://www.morganshotelgroup.com/-- is widely credited as the
creator of the first "boutique" hotel and a continuing leader of
the hotel industry's boutique sector.  Morgans Hotel Group
operates and owns, or has an ownership interest in, Morgans,
Royalton and Hudson in New York, Delano and Shore Club in South
Beach, Mondrian in Los Angeles and South Beach, Clift in San
Francisco, Ames in Boston, and Sanderson and St Martins Lane in
London.  Morgans Hotel Group and an equity partner also own the
Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas and related assets.  Morgans
Hotel Group also manages hotels in Isla Verde, Puerto Rico and
Playa del Carmen, Mexico.  Morgans Hotel Group has other property
transactions in various stages of completion, including projects
in SoHo, New York and Palm Springs, California.

Morgans Hotel reported net income attributable to common
stockholders of $5.45 million on $220 million of total revenues for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss attributable
to common stockholders of $66.6 million on $234 million of total
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, Morgans Hotel had $512 million in total
assets, $737 million in total liabilities and a total deficit of
$225 million.


NAMAL ENTERPRISES: TD Bank Wants to Prohibit Cash Collateral Use
----------------------------------------------------------------
TD Bank, N.A., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida to prohibit Namal Enterprises, LLC, fdba Red
Roof Inn Kissimmee, fda Blue Inn LBVS's use of cash collateral.

TD Bank contends that the Debtor is indebted to it in the original
principal amount of $2,000,000 by virtue of a Promissory Note,
which is secured by a Mortgage encumbering the Debtor's real
property commonly known as the Blue Inn Hotel located at 4970 Kyngs
Heath Road, Kissimmee, Florida.  TD Bank further contends that the
Mortgage granted to it a security interest in all of the rents,
profits, and income generated from the Property.

TD Bank says that the Promissory Note is also secured by a Security
Agreement, which grants to TD Bank a security interest in all of
the Debtor's personal property, which includes the Debtor's cash
accounts. TD Bank further says that it has a first priority lien on
the Debtor's cash collateral by virtue of the Mortgage and Security
Agreement.

TD Bank tells the Court that it has not consented to the use of the
cash collateral and that the Court has not authorized the use of
the cash collateral.  TD Bank further tells the Court that it
opposes the use of the cash collateral unless the Debtor provides
adequate protection for its use of the cash collateral, accounts
for any cash collateral received post-petition, and agrees to
certain other restrictions to protect TD Bank's interest.  

A full-text copy of TD Bank's Motion, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/jdfP6o

TD Bank, N.A., is represented by:

          Daniel F. Blanks, Esq.
          NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP
          50 N. Laura Street, Suite 4100
          Jacksonville, FL 32202
          Telephone: (904)665-3656
          E-mail: daniel.blanks@nelsonmullins.com

         About Namal Enterprises, LLC, fdba Red Roof Inn
                  Kissimmee, fda Blue Inn LBVS.

Namal Enterprises, LLC fdba Red Roof Inn Kissimmee fdba Blue Inn
LBVS filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
16-07190) on August 22, 2016.  The petition was signed by Syed
Raza, manager.

The Debtor disclosed total assets at $3.14 million and total
liabilities at $1.88 million. The Debtor is represented by Richard
J. McIntyre, Esq. and Katie Brinson Hinton, Esq., at McIntyre
Thanasides Bringgold, et. al.


NEPHROGENEX INC: Proposes Protocol for Sale of All Assets
---------------------------------------------------------
NephroGenex, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware to authorize bidding procedures in connection with the
sale of substantially all assets.

Since the execution of its engagement agreement with the Debtor on
April 29, 2016, Cassel Salpeter & Co., LLC, has worked closely with
the Debtor and its professionals, consultants and members of the
Debtor's Board of Directors to identify buyers that might be
interested in acquiring the Debtor's assets.  Through this, Cassel
Salpeter developed a list of over 275 entities that Cassel Salpeter
believed may have interest in the Debtor's 2 formulations of
Pyridorin.  This target list includes (i) parties that previously
have been approached by the Debtor or its advisors regarding a
potential transaction with the Debtor; (ii) additional parties
Cassel Salpeter has identified as potential buyers.  Cassel
Salpeter has also spoken to several creditors and interest holders
that have sought to provide input regarding the sale process.
Cassel Salpeter has been willing to speak with parties-in-interest
regarding the Debtor's ongoing sale efforts.

To date, approximately 65 nondisclosure agreements ("NDAs") and 191
non-confidential presentations have been circulated, and 18 NDAs
have been executed.  Those entities that have executed NDAs have
been provided access to a virtual data room ("Data Room")
containing, among other things, pre-clinical and clinical data for
Pyridorin, information pertaining to the structure of the clinical
studies and correspondence with the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration.  Moreover, parties requesting additional
information have been provided access to the Debtor's management,
consultants and intellectual property counsel.

After approximately 10 weeks of active marketing, Cassel Salpeter
informed parties in the Data Room that, in order to be considered
as potential "stalking horse" purchaser, parties were required to
submit written indications of interest on or before July 19, 2016
at 5:00 p.m.  Unfortunately, on Aug. 23, 2016, before the
documentation was finalized, the bidder informed the Debtor that it
would not proceed with the anticipated transaction.  Accordingly,
the Debtor, after consultation with its professionals, determined
to seek approval for an auction process to be conducted without a
stalking horse purchaser.

The Debtor's objective throughout its sale process has been to
obtain maximum exposure of its assets to potential buyers, and it
will consider any transaction that will result in obtaining the
highest or otherwise best value for the assets.  To that end, the
Debtor has developed the bidding procedures ("Bidding Procedures")
to provide potential buyers with maximum flexibility in proposing
acquisition transaction, which can take the form of, among other
things, a sale under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code of a
transaction through chapter 11 plan.

The Debtor intends to solicit bids for its assets in accordance
with the Bidding Procedures.  The Bidding Procedures reflect the
Debtor's objective of conducting auction in a controlled, but fair
and open, manner, while ensuring the highest or otherwise best bid
is generated for the assets.

The material terms of the Bidding Procedures are as follows:

   a. Bid Deadline: Nov. 10, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

   b. Bid Requirements: (i) a modified Trade Agreement marked
against the Form Asset Purchase Agreement; (ii) an offer to
purchase the assets upon the terms set forth in its modified Trade
Agreement; and (iii) a proposal to implement an acquisition
transaction through a Plan.

   c. Qualifying Bids: The Debtor will make a determination
regarding whether a timely submitted bid is a qualifying bid, and
will notify the qualifying bidder whether their bids have been
determined to be qualifying bids by no later than 2 calendar days
from the date of such notification to modify its bid to increase
the purchase price or otherwise improve the terms of the qualifying
bid.

   d. Auction: In the event that the Debtor timely receives more
than one qualifying bid, the Debtor will conduct an auction.

   e. Sale Hearing: Nov. 17, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. (ET)

   f. Deposits: All deposits will be returned to each bidder not
selected by the Debtor as successful bidder or back-up bidder.

The auction will be governed, among others, by the following
procedures:

   a. the auction will be held on Nov. 14, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. (ET)
at the offices of Cole Scholtz P.C., 500 Delaware Ave., Suite 1410,
Wilmington, Delaware;

   b. Only a stalking horse purchaser and the other qualifying
bidders with qualifying bids will be entitled to make any
subsequent bids at the auction;

   c. the auction bidders will appear in person at the auction, or
through a duly authorized representative;

   d. only the Debtor, the auction bidders and all creditors of the
Debtor, together with the professional advisors to each of the
foregoing parties, may attend the auction;

   e. the Debtor and its professional advisor will direct and
preside over the auction, which will be transcribed;

   f. bidding on the assets will commence at the amount of the
baseline bid, and the auction bidders may submit successive bids in
increments of 2% of the baseline bid; and

   g. upon conclusion of the auction, the Debtor will determine,
subject to Court approval, the offer for the assets that is the
highest or otherwise the best from among qualifying bids submitted
at the auction.

To facilitate the sale, the Debtor seeks authority to assume and
assign to any acquire in a Sale the Assumed Contracts in accordance
with the Assumption and Assignment Procedures.

The Assumption and Assignment Procedures Order are detailed and
provide for the following, among other things:

   a. The identification of contracts that potentially could be
assumed and assigned in connection with the sale and corresponding
proposed cure amounts.

   b. At least 14 calendar days for counterparties to the Assumed
Contracts to object.

   c. Notice after the auction of the identity of the proposed
assignee, with the opportunity for counterparties to object to the
adequate assurance of future performance provided by such proposed
assignee.

   d. The deemed consent of counterparties to the proposed
assumption and assignment and cure amounts if such counterparties
fail to timely object to the proposed assumption, assignment and
cure amounts.

The Bidding Procedures Order, if approved, will establish the
following timeline, which the Debtor believes is appropriate to
arrive at a value maximizing transaction:

   a. Bidding Procedures Hearing: Oct. 2, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. (ET)

   b. Sale Notice and Assumption Notice Deadline: Oct. 7, 2016

   c. Sale Objection and Assumption Notice Deadline: Oct. 28, 2016
at 4:00 p.m. (ET)

   d. Bid Deadline: Nov. 10, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

   e. Auction: Nov. 14, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. (ET)

   f. Adequate Assurance Objection Deadline: Nov. 16, 2016 at 12:00
noon (ET)

   g. Sale Hearing: Nov. 17, 2016 10:00 a.m. (ET)

   h. Outside Closing Date: 14 business days after entry of the
Sale Order.

A copy of the proposed Bidding Procedures Order, Asset Purchase
Agreement and Notice attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Nephrogenex_Inc_147_Sales.pdf

The Debtor is committed to considering all rational and viable
proposals to obtain the highest and best value for its assets.  The
open and fair auction and sale process contemplated in the Bidding
Procedures will ensure that the Debtor's estate receives the
highest and best value available by allowing the market to test the
purchase price of the assets.

Additionally, the Debtor believes that the notice procedures are
reasonable and adequate under the circumstances.  Therefore, the
Debtor asks that the Court approve the Bidding Procedures,
including the dates established for the auction and the sale
hearing.

                      About NephroGenex

Raleigh, N.C.-based NephroGenex, Inc., is a drug development
company that focuses on developing novel therapies for kidney
disease.  It develops Pyridorin (pyridoxamine dihydrochoride), a
therapeutic agent, which is in Phase III clinical study for the
treatment of diabetic nephropathy.

It filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 16-11074) on April 30, 2016, listing $4.9 million in total
assets as of April 30, 2016, and $6.2 million in total debts as of
April 30, 2016.  The petition was signed by John P. Hamill, chief
executive officer and chief financial officer.

David R. Hurst, Esq., at Cole Scotz P.C. serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.

Cassel Salpeter & Co. LLC is the Debtor's investment banker and
financial advisor.

Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the Debtor's claims and
noticing
agent.


NORFE GROUP: Needs Until Nov 13 to File Chapter 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------------
Norfe Group, Corp., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to extend by 60
days the exclusive periods during which only the Debtor may file
and solicit acceptances of a plan of reorganization through Nov.
13, 2016 and Feb. 9, 2017, respectively.

The Debtor submits that the Court's resolution of these contested
matters, that are scheduled to be heard on Oct. 3, 2015, is
necessary in order to present a feasible Plan:

     (a) Puerto Rico Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC's
proof of claim number 5 and the objection thereto, and

     (b) the extent of PRAPI's alleged rights and security interest
in the rental income arising from Debtor's Shopping Center
operating under the name of Paseo Del Plata, at Dorado, Puerto
Rico.

Moreover, the Debtor asserts that it is in the process of
evaluating various alternatives for financing, with a bearing on
the nature and feasibility of the Plan.

                              About Norfe Group

Norfe Group Corp. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
D.P.R. Case No. 16-00285) in Old San Juan, Puerto Rico, on Jan. 20,
2016.  The petition was signed by David Efron, president.

The firm scheduled $17,269,436 in total assets and $31,441,591 in
total liabilities.

The Debtor tapped Charles Alfred Cuprill, Esq., at Charles A
Cuprill, PSC Law Office, as counsel.  CPA Luis R. Carrasquillo &
Co., P.S.C., serves as financial consultant.


NORMAN EDWARD MCMAHON: Sale of Sewell Property for $175K Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
authorized Norman Edward McMahon to sell his property located at
160 Essex Ave., Sewell, New Jersey to Eric Marchesano for
$175,000.

The sale is free and clear of all liens.

Pursuant to the terms of the Contract for Sale of Real Estate, the
proceeds will be distributed to all taxes and other unavoidable
liens of taxing authorities against the property, the commission of
$10,500 due to Berkshire Hathaway Fox & Roach Realtors, and any
additional settlement costs chargeable to the Debtor, with any
remainder payable to the Debtor, into an escrow account pending
distribution under a Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

The proceeds will therefore be retained by the Debtor in his
counsel's IOLTA account.

A copy of the Contract for Sale of Real Estate attached to the
Order is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Norman_McMahon_69_Order.pdf

The Purchaser can be reached at:

          Eric McMahon
          121 Wilson Ave.,
          Sewell, NJ 08080

Norman Edward McMahon filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D. Penn. Case No. 16-11874) on March 18, 2016.  The case
was later converted to Chapter 11.  The Debtor is the owner and
president of Payall Solutions, LLC, a payroll processing firm.  The
Debtor is represented by:

     DAVID A. SCHOLL, Esq.
     512 Hoffman Street
     Philadelphia, PA 19148
     Tel: 610-550-1765


OAKS OF PRAIRIE: Has Until Oct. 31 to Use Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas M. Lynch of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Illinois authorized The Oaks of Prairie Point
Condominium Association to use cash collateral on an interim basis,
during the period Sept. 1, 2016 through Oct. 31, 2016.

The approved Budget for the months of September 2016 and October
2016, provided for total projected expenses in the amount of
$31,079 for September 2016 and $43,238 for October 2016.

Judge Lynch held that the items identified in the approved Budget
as "exterior repairs" will not be paid without further approval
from Illinois State Bank.

The Debtor was directed to pay Illinois State Bank the sum of
$10,729 on or before Sept. 15, 2016, and again on or before Oct.
15, 2016.

Illinois State Bank was granted a valid and perfected, enforceable
security interest in and to the Debtor's post-petition accounts,
assessments and other receivables to the extent and priority of its
alleged pre-petition liens, but only to the extent of any
diminution in the value of such assets from the Petition Date
through October 31, 2016.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/JzcU8G

                About The Oaks of Prairie Point
                    Condominium Association

The Oaks of Prairie Point Condominium Association is an Illinois
corporation that owns and operates condominium buildings located in
Lake in the Hills, Illinois, known as "The Oaks of Prairie Point
Condominium".  

The Oaks of Prairie Point Condominium sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.
16-80238) on Feb. 3, 2016.  The Debtor is represented by Thomas W.
Goedert, Esq., at Crane, Heyman, Simon, Welch & Clar, in Chicago,
Illinois.  The petition was signed by Donna Smith, property
manager.  The case is assigned to Judge Thomas M. Lynch.  The
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10
million at the time of the filing.


OI SA: Creditors Said to Oppose Proposed Restructuring Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Cristiane Lucchesi, writing for Bloomberg News, reported that
creditors of Oi SA, the Brazilian phone company that filed for
bankruptcy with $20 billion of debt, view the restructuring plan
the company presented as unfairly benefiting shareholders, said two
people with direct knowledge of the matter.

According to the report, the main issue is the right Oi has to
redeem bondholders' convertibles anytime it wants, the people said,
asking not to be named because the position isn't public yet.
Creditors argue that the option for early redemption gives current
shareholders power to avoid dilution if the company manages to
stage a turnaround, but leaves bondholders with a large stake if
things go badly, the people said, the report related.

The Rio de Janeiro-based operator proposed converting up to 32.3
billion reais ($10.1 billion) of bondholders' debt into convertible
bonds with a face value of 10 billion reais, the report further
related.  Lenders would get 85 percent of the company if Oi doesn't
pay off the debt in three years -- leaving current shareholders in
control of the company for that time span, and potentially
benefiting from any recovery, the people said, the report added.

The creditors also oppose the 10-year grace period suggested for
bank debt, considered too long, and the option shareholders have of
using proceeds from asset sales to pay bondholders' convertibles,
which could avoid dilution, the people said, the report noted.  The
plan will need to change to be approved by creditors, the report
said, citing the people.

                           About Oi SA

Headquartered in Rio de Janeiro, and operating almost exclusively
within Brazil, the Oi Group provides services like fixed-line data
transmission and network usage for phones, internet, and cable,
Wi-Fi hot-spots in public areas, and mobile phone and data
services, and employs approximately 142,000 direct and indirect
employees.

Ojas N. Shah filed a Chapter 15 petition for Oi S.A. (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-11791), Oi Movel S.A. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 16-11792), Telemar Norte Leste S.A. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
16-11793), and Oi Brasil Holdings Cooperatief U.A. (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 16-11794) on June 21, 2016.  The case is assigned to
Judge
Sean H. Lane.

The Chapter 15 Petitioner is represented by John K. Cunningham,
Esq., and Mark P. Franke, Esq., at White & Case LLP, in New York;
and Jason N. Zakia, Esq., Richard S. Kebrdle, Esq., and Laura L.
Femino, Esq., at White & Case LLP, in Miami, Florida.


PALMER FARMS: Wants Authorization to Use GWB Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------
Palmer Farms, Incorporated, and its affiliated debtors ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona for authorization to
use cash collateral.

The Debtors are indebted to Great Western Bank, N.A., in the amount
of over $4,400,000.

Great Western Bank applied for a receiver to take possession of
Debtors Palmer Farms and Palmer Cattle and noticed a trustee's sale
of the farm property for Sept. 6, 2016.

The Debtors tell the Court that they require the use of all cash
generated from their operations to continue operation of their
businesses, including the protection, management, and maintenance
of estate assets.  The Debtors further tell the Court that their
businesses generate cash proceeds through crops harvested, and
through subleases of farm land.  They add that Debtor Palmer Cattle
has also generated revenue from raising and selling cattle.

The Debtors propose to grant Great Western Bank with replacement
liens in the Debtors' collateral to the same extent, validity, and
priority as existed prepetition.

The Debtors contend that to successfully reorganize, they must be
able to operate their businesses and generate proceeds to pay
ordinary and necessary expenses.  The Debtors further contend that
without authority to use operating cash, including cash collateral,
they will not be able to:

   (1) pay ordinary and necessary operating expenses including
payment of wages to their employees;

   (2) purchase water, seed, chemicals and fertilizer necessary to
continue farming operations; and

   (3) propose a successful plan of reorganization.

A full-text copy of the Debtors' Motion, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/Ugs1Bz

Palmer Farms, Incorporated, and Palmer Cattle, LLC, are represented
by:

          Michael McGrath, Esq.
          Isaac D. Rothschild, Esq.
          Jeffrey J. Coe, Esq.
          MESCH CLARK ROTHSCHILD
          259 North Meyer Avenue
          Tucson, AZ 85701
          Telephone: (520) 624-8886
          E-mail: mmcgrath@mcrazlaw.com
                  irothschild@mcrazlaw.com
                  jcoe@mcrazlaw.com

Marco D. Palmer and Elena D. Palmer are represented by:

          Dennis J. Clancy, Esq.
          RAVEN, CLANCY & MCDONAGH, P.C.
          182 N. Court Ave.
          Tucson, AZ 85701-1002
          Telephone: (520)628-8700
          E-mail: dclancy@ravlaw.com

               About Palmer Farms, Incorporated

Palmer Farms, Incorporated, Palmer Cattle, LLC, Marco Duane Palmer
and Elena Pavlovna Palmer filed chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D.
Ariz. Case Nos. 4:16-bk-10202-BMW, 4:16-bk-10201-BMW, and
4:16-bk-10206-SHG, respectively) on Sept. 2, 2016.  Palmer Farms
and Palmer Cattle are represented by Michael McGrath, Esq., Isaac
D. Rothschild, Esq., and Jeffrey J. Coe, Esq., at Mesch Clark
Rothschild.  Marco D. and Elena P. Palmer are represented by Dennis
J. Clancy, Esq., at Raven, Clancy & McDonagh, P.C.

Marco and Elena Palmer are husband and wife and live in Thatcher,
Arizona.  Marco is a fifth generation farmer who has farmed in
Thatcher for over 40 years.  Marco Palmer is the former
vice-president of the irrigation district in Thatcher, Arizona.  In
about 2010, the Palmers expanded into cattle ranching.  

Palmer Farms operates a farm on approximately 1200 acres in
Thatcher, Arizona. Farms primarily grows cotton and durum wheat and
employs four employees.  Palmer Farms currently subleases about 500
acres to Danny Curley.

Palmer Cattle is a cattle ranch but does not currently own any
cattle.  The ranch owns equipment and feed and has the capacity to
raise cattle, however, in July of 2014, Great Western Bank, N.A.
directed Palmer Cattle to not purchase any cattle, despite knowing
that Palmer Cattle had acquired a large amount of feed and
equipment for the cattle operation.


PEEK, AREN'T YOU: Unsec. Creditors to Have 23% Recovery Under Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Peek, Aren't You Curious, Inc., on Oct. 6, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.,
will seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of California, in San Francisco, of a Disclosure Statement
explaining a Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation that promises 23 cents
on the dollar for unsecured creditors.

After exhausting all avenues for obtaining a strategic investor or
buyer, in mid-November 2015, Charlotte Russe expressed interest in
acquiring several of Peek's retail locations and manufacturing
assets.  After a series of meetings and expedited due diligence,
Charlotte Russe offered to purchase some of Peek's assets pursuant
to an Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets dated Feb. 4, 2016.


Under the terms of the APA, Charlotte Russe initially agreed to
acquire these assets:

  * 8 of Peek's 21 retail stores1;
  * Inventory at Peek's distribution centers and in transit;
  * Ecommerce assets and associated contracts; and
  * Intellectual property associated with the design and
manufacturing of Peek's brand and product lines.

The primary financial goal of the proposed sale was to maximize
returns to unsecured creditors by: (a) minimizing operations losses
and the accrual of post-bankruptcy rent and other administrative
expenses, (b) reducing the pool of lease rejection claims through
assignment of leases, and (c) maximizing the recoveries from store
inventory not sold to Charlotte Russe.

Peek filed this proceeding in order to close the sale to Charlotte
Russe pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 363.  The Court approved the 363
Sale to Charlotte Russe by an order dated March 14, 2016.  Peek
closed the 363 Sale on March 18, 2016 and thereafter ceased
operations at its nine remaining locations.  Thus, Peek has no
ongoing business operations.

Peek has on hand funds totaling approximately $1.3 million to pay
creditors.  Peek intends to distribute these funds to creditors
according to the priorities set forth in the Bankruptcy Code, inter
alia, 11 U.S.C. Sec. 507 in a liquidating Chapter 11 plan.

Further to that end, on Aug. 25, 2016, Peek filed its proposed
Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation.  The principal purpose of the Plan
is to set forth how any remaining assets of Peek's estate will be
liquidated and the proceeds distributed to its creditors.

The Plan contemplates that the remaining assets of the Debtors'
estate will be distributed to creditors in the manner dictated by
the Bankruptcy Code.  That is, creditors who hold liens on specific
assets, if any, will be paid from the proceeds of their collateral.
After those secured claims are satisfied, all unencumbered assets
will be distributed in accordance with the priorities established
in Section 507 of the Bankruptcy Code. Where there is not enough
cash to pay all creditors of equal priority in full, pro rata
distributions will be made to allowed claim holders, and no
distributions will be made to any creditors that are junior in
priority.

The Plan estimates that holders of secured claims owed $109,665
will recover 100 percent.  General unsecured creditors owed
$3,014,510 will have a 23 percent recovery.  Holders of late claims
totaling $493,262 will have a 0 percent to 23 percent recovery.
Interest holders won't receive anything.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement explaining the Debtor's Chapter
11 Plan of Liquidation dated August 25, 2016, is available for free
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb16-30146_Peek_191_DS.pdf

                 About Peek, Aren't You Curious

Peek, Aren't You Curious, Inc., designed, manufactured and sold
apparel, accessories, shoes, and gifts for girls, boys, and
babies.

Peek sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 16-30146) on Feb. 5, 2016.  The petition
was signed by Maria C. Canales, CEO.

As of its bankruptcy filing, Peek sold high-end children's clothing
through 21 retail stores in 10 states (one of which closed on Jan.
23, 2016), a wholesale relationship with Nordstrom department
stores, and an Ecommerce platform.

The bankruptcy case is assigned to Judge Hannah L. Blumenstiel.
The Debtor tapped Nuti Hart LLP as its legal counsel; Gordon
Brothers Retail Partners LLC as liquidation agent; DJM Realty
Services LLC as real estate consultant; and Donlin, Recano &
Company Inc. as claims and noticing agent.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets and debt
at $1 million to $10 million.


PENNHILL FARMS: Unsecureds' Projected Recovery Down to 4.6%
-----------------------------------------------------------
PennHill Farms, Inc., on Aug. 26, 2016, filed a Second Amended
Disclosure Statement that says unsecured creditors would recover
4.6% under its Plan of Reorganization.

The prior iteration of the Disclosure Statement expected a 5.4%
recovery for unsecured creditors.

According to the Second Amended Disclosure Statement, assuming that
the total Class 3 general unsecured claims equal $665,000, the
payout to the claimants will be approximately 4.6% of their allowed
claims.  The figure may go up or down depending on the amount of
litigation required to confirm the Plan, additional fees or costs
incurred by the estate, and any amendments to claims filed by
creditors.  The Debtor will continue to pursue sales opportunities
for all of its assets through Dec. 31, 2016, and additional sales
will likely increase the payout to creditors.

The Debtor says the payout to unsecured creditors is much less in a
Chapter 7 case due to these factors: (1) Bob Pohlod is waiving his
administrative claim for postpetition rent of the Pennsylvania
property if the Plan is confirmed; and (2) the Citiwide Banks
secured claim may be increase if the Plan is not confirmed.

A copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement (filed Aug. 25,
2016) to accompany the Plan of Reorganization dated April 15, 2016
is available at:

  http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob14-22139_Pennhill_430_2nd_Am_DS.pdf

                       About PennHill Farms

PennHill Farms, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 14-22139) on Sept. 3, 2014, estimating
assets and liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.  The
petition was signed by Susan Pohlod, vice president.  Judge Howard
R Tallman presides over the case.

Headquartered in Parker, Colorado, PennHill Farms was formed in
1998 by Robert M. Pohlod, who is the Debtor's sole shareholder and
director.  The Debtor is a wholesale tree nursery with a tree
growing farm in Pennsylvania.  The Debtor's business model included
growing trees in Pennsylvania then shipping the trees to the
PennHill nursery in Parker, Colorado for sale to wholesale buyers.
The Debtor grew and sold a wide variety of trees such as evergreen
trees, ornamental trees, and shade trees.  The majority of the tree
sales were placed through the Colorado offices to wholesale
businesses in Colorado.  The Debtor operated successfully for 15
years growing trees in Pennsylvania, then shipping and selling
trees in Colorado.

Lee M. Kutner, Esq., Kutner Brinen Garber, P.C., serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


PITNEY BOWES: Moody's Cuts Preference Shelf Rating to (P)Ba2
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s ("Pitney
Bowes") senior unsecured debt ratings to Baa3 from Baa2, and
downgraded the short term rating to P-3 from P-2. As part of the
rating action, Moody's downgraded the preferred instrument rating
at Pitney Bowes International Holdings to Ba2 from Ba1. The rating
outlook is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade reflects the slower than anticipated revenue and cash
flow contributions from the company's digital commerce and software
businesses, which have not grown to overcome the secular declines
in the company's legacy mailing business. Despite Pitney Bowes'
efforts to improve its operating platforms and cost structure, the
company's adjusted Debt/EBITDA leverage has recently risen above
3.0 times, while free cash flow generation remains depressed amid
restructuring expenses. Still, by Moody's estimates, even if the
company's strategic efforts play out over the next two years, its
credit metrics would not be within the current expectations for the
Baa2 rating category.

Moody's recognizes Pitney Bowes' strong leadership in its postal
metering business and a demonstrated commitment to maintain strong
credit protection measures. The small and mid-sized business
segment contributes meaningfully to Pitney Bowes' profit through
its receivables financing programs, but the equipment financing
business weighs on the company's credit profile given the need to
refinance large annual debt maturities. Moody's anticipates that
the company will apply a measured approach to its free cash flow
allocation and will continue paying down its debt balances in line
with the declining finance receivables associated with its mailing
business.

Pitney Bowes also faces challenges from the secular decline in mail
delivery that is shrinking the installed equipment base, while
emerging competitors pressure pricing. Though Pitney Bowes is
refocusing its strategy around its longstanding mailing and
shipping strengths and business intelligence it has built up over
the last century, it needs to record strong digital commerce
revenue growth to overcome the declines of the mailing business.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that despite the
anticipated deterioration of revenues in the core mailing business,
the company is in a position to address its business challenges
through expense management and longer term cash flow generating
potential.

The ratings could be downgraded if the persistent revenue
contraction is not reversed, if adjusted debt to EBITDA remains
above 3.0 times for an extended period or if free cash flow to debt
percentage remains in the low single digits. The rating would also
be pressured if the company prioritizes shareholder payouts over
maintaining conservative financial policies.

Considering the secular pressure on the legacy mailing business, a
near term upgrade is unlikely. The ratings could be upgraded if
there is tangible progress in driving revenue growth, operating
margin improvement, adjusted debt/EBITDA leverage is maintained
below 2 times and free cash flow to adjusted debt percentage grows
to double digits.

Ratings Actions:

   Issuer: Pitney Bowes Inc.

   -- Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to Baa3
      from Baa2

   -- Issuer Rating, Downgraded to Baa3 from Baa2

   -- Senior Unsecured Shelf, Downgraded to (P)Baa3 from (P)Baa2

   -- Preferred Shelf, Downgraded to (P)Ba2 from (P)Ba1

   -- Preference Shelf, Downgraded to (P)Ba2 from (P)Ba1

   -- Subordinate Shelf, Downgraded to (P)Ba1 from (P)Baa3

   -- Senior Unsecured Commercial Paper, Downgraded to P-3 from P-
      2

   -- Senior Unsecured Medium-Term Note Program, Downgraded to
      (P)Baa3 from (P)Baa2

   Issuer: Pitney Bowes International Holdings

   -- Preferred Stock, Downgraded to Ba2 from Ba1

Outlook Actions:

   Issuer: Pitney Bowes Inc.

   -- Outlook, Remains Stable

   Issuer: Pitney Bowes International Holdings

   -- Outlook, Remains Stable

Based in Stamford, CT, Pitney Bowes is a leading global provider of
integrated mail, messaging and document management solutions that
includes postage meters, mailing equipment and related document
messaging services and software, mail and marketing services.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Diversified
Technology Rating Methodology published in December 2015.


POSITIVEID CORP: Accumulated Losses Raise Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------------
PositiveID Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $1.91 million on $1.85 million of revenue for the three months
ended June 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $2.93 million on
$51,000 of revenue for the same period in 2015.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company listed a net
loss of $3.19 million on $3.51 million of revenue, compared to a
net loss of $3.38 million on $182,000 of revenue for the same
period in the prior year.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $2.86 million in total assets,
$16.21 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
equity of $13.35 million.

The Company has incurred operating losses prior to and since the
merger that created PositiveID.  The operating losses during 2015
and for the three and six months ending June 30, 2016 are the
result of research and development expenditures, selling, general
and administrative expenses related to Company's molecular
diagnostics and Caregiver® products.  The Company expects its
operating losses to continue through 2016.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/OuI00k

                        About PositiveID

Delray Beach, Fla.-based PositiveID Corporation has historically
developed, marketed and sold RFID systems used for the
identification of people in the healthcare market.  Beginning in
early 2011, the Company has focused its strategy on the growth of
its HealthID business, including the continued development of its
GlucoChip, its Easy Check breath glucose detection device, its
iglucose wireless communication system, and potential strategic
acquisition opportunities of businesses that are complementary to
its HealthID business.

PositiveID reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $11.5 million on $2.94 million of revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015, compared with a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $8.22 million on $945,000 of revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of March 31, 2016, PositiveID had $3.61 million in total assets,
$17.9 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $14.3 million.

Salberg & Company, P.A., in Boca Raton, Florida, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company reported a
net loss, and used cash for operating activities of approximately
$11,404,000 and $4,507,000 respectively, in 2015.  At Dec. 31,
2015, the Company had a working capital deficiency, a stockholders'
deficit and an accumulated deficit of approximately $10,694,000,
$11,842,000 and $144,161,000 respectively.  These matters raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.



POWELL VALLEY: Wants Plan Filing Period Extended to December 14
---------------------------------------------------------------
Powell Valley Health Care, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Wyoming to extend its exclusive periods to file a
plan and obtain acceptance of its plan, through December 14, 2016
and February 14, 2016, respectively.

The Debtor relates that its exclusive period to file a plan of
reorganization will expire on September 14, 2016.  The Debtor
further relates that its exclusive period to obtain acceptance of
its plan will expire on November 14, 2016.

The Debtor contends that it is exploring settlement negotiations
with its Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors  and other
creditor groups.  The Debtor further contends that it is in the
process of seeking the Court's approval to retain a financial
advisor that will be critical in assisting the Debtor with
determining the feasibility of any proposed plan of
reorganization.

The Debtor tells the Court that it needs additional time to
negotiate with creditors and work with its financial advisor prior
to formulating the final terms of its plan of reorganization.

                About Powell Valley Health Care, Inc.

Powell Valley Health Care, Inc. provides healthcare services to the
greater-Powell, Wyoming community.  The Company filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Wyo. Case No. 16-20326) on May
16, 2016.  The petition was signed by Michael L. Long, CFO.

The Debtor is represented by Bradley T. Hunsicker, Esq., at Markus
Williams Young & Zimmermann LLC.  The case is assigned to Judge
Cathleen D. Parker.  The Debtor estimated assets and debts at $10
million to $50 million at the time of the filing.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed in the case.

The United States Trustee appointed Larry Heiser, Veronica
Sommerville, Michelle Oliver, and Joetta Johnson to serve on the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  The Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors tapped Spencer Fane LLP as counsel.  



PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY: Covenant Problems Raise Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional Diversity Network, Inc., filed its quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $806,269 on $6.85 million of
total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared
with a net loss of $778,279 on $10.40 million of total revenues for
the same period in 2015.

The Company's balance sheet at June 30, 2016, showed $37.37 million
in total assets, $16.47 million in total liabilities, and a
stockholders' equity of $20.90 million.

The Company had an accumulated loss of approximately $43,136,000 at
June 30, 2016.  During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the
Company generated a net loss of approximately $2,246,000, used cash
in operations of approximately $2,233,000, and expects that it will
continue to generate operating losses for the foreseeable future.
On March 30, 2016, the Company entered into a Master Credit
Facility Agreement (the "Master Credit Facility") with White
Winston Select Asset Funds, LLC ("White Winston") providing for a
revolving credit facility (the "Facility") in the principal amount
up to the lesser of $5,000,000 or 75% of the outstanding balance of
the Company's eligible customer receivables.  On June 30, 2016, the
Company closed the Master Credit Facility and received an initial
disbursement of $1,572,576 (before deduction of related fees and
expenses).  As of June 30, 2016, the Company had drawn
approximately $435,000 more than its availability under the Master
Credit Facility, accordingly, the Company's ability to receive
additional funds under the Master Credit Facility is fully at White
Winston's discretion.  The Company may use the proceeds of the
Master Credit Facility for working capital needs and to pay the
costs, fees and expenses in connection with the Master Credit
Facility.  If revenues continue to decline, the outstanding balance
of eligible receivables may not be sufficient to support the
outstanding loan balance.  If the Company is unable to meet its
obligations under the Master Credit Facility, they would be in
default and would need White Winston to agree to a waiver.
Management makes no assurances that White Winston would provide a
waiver if needed, which would result in a default in accordance
with the terms of the Master Credit Facility.

The Company's obligations under the Master Credit Facility are
secured by a first priority lien in all of the Company's
consolidated tangible and intangible property, including all
receivables from the operations of its business and all of the
outstanding ownership interests in each of the Company's direct and
indirect subsidiaries.

These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern.  The Company's ability to continue
as a going concern is dependent on management's plans.  Its ability
to execute its operating plan beyond September 2016 is dependent on
White Winston agreeing to additional advances under the Master
Credit Facility, controlling operating costs and capital
requirements, completing the transaction with CFL, if the Company
is unable to access the Master Credit Facility, obtaining
additional funding via the sale of equity and/or debt securities.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:
                              
                       https://is.gd/VAHBqU

Chicago-based Professional Diversity Network, Inc., develops and
operates online professional networking communities that serve
diverse professionals in the United States and employers seeking to
hire diverse talent.  The Company's subsidiary, National
Association of Professional Women (NAPW) is one of the largest,
most recognized networking organizations of professional women in
the country, spanning more than 200 industries and professions.



RELIABLE RACING: Can Use Cash Collateral Until Sept. 19
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert E. Littlefield, Jr. of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of New York, authorized Reliable Racing
Supply, Inc., to use cash collateral on an interim basis through
Sept. 19, 2016, under the terms of the Court's First Interim
Order.

TD Bank was authorized to transfer from the Debtor In Possession
Account such funds that exceed the DIP Balance of $40,000 to the
Debtor's Excess Cash Account at TD Bank.  TD Bank was further
authorized to apply the funds in the Excess Cash Account to the
amount due pursuant to the TD Bank Loan Documents, upon the
expiration of the Court's Order.

A further interim hearing on the Debtor's Motion is scheduled on
Sept. 19, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/YjG3CE

                  About Reliable Racing Supply

Reliable Racing Supply, Inc., sells ski, bike and snowboard
equipment through its store Inside Edge Ski, Board & Bike located
at 643 Upper Glen Street, Queensbury, New York.  It also sells ski
racing products to its consumers through its Wintersports online
catalog.

Reliable Racing Supply, Inc., doing business as Inside Edge Ski &
Bike, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case No.
16-10619) on April 7, 2016.  The petition was signed by John
Jacobs, president.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert E.
Littlefield, Jr.  The Debtor disclosed assets of $2.98 million and
liabilities of $2.55 million as of Feb. 29, 2016.  The Debtor is
represented by Meghan M. Breen, Esq., at Lemery Greisler, LLC.


REVEREND C.T. WALKER: 181 West Offers $9M for New York Property
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reverend C.T. Walker Housing Development Fund Corp., asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to authorize
the Contract of Sale in connection with the sale of real property
located at 179-183 West 135th Street, New York, New York, also
known as 181 West 135th Street, New York, New York and Section 7,
Block 1920, Lot 7 ("Premises"), to 181 West 135th, LLC, or its
designee, for $9,000,000, subject to higher and better offers.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Sept. 22, 2016 at 12 p.m.
Objection deadline is Sept. 15, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. (EST).

The Debtor operates its business at the Premises through Prestige
Management, Inc., its proposed real property management company.
Since its formation in 1986, the company has been in the business
of providing affordable, low-income housing for individuals and
families at the Premises. In addition, as part of its acquisition
and financing of repairs at its business location provided space to
the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater New York ("YMCA")
for operation of its "Youth Center" under a perpetual lease with an
annual rent of $1.

The Debtor was compelled to file for chapter 11 relief because of
its severe financial distress. The source of the Debtor's financial
troubles can be attributed to a single factor, the expiration of
the Debtor's J-51 real property tax exemption for the Premises
("Tax Exemption"). Before the Petition Date, the Debtor's operation
had been incurring losses as a result of the loss of the Tax
exemption of about $250,000 per year for the past 10 years. As of
the Petition Date, the Debtor was losing approximately $20,000 per
month on average and could not continue to sustain such losses.
Furthermore, prepetition The City of New York commenced a tax lien
foreclosure proceeding against the Debtor through the sale of a tax
lien certificate on the real property to Bank of New York Mellon as
Custodian and Agent of 2 trusts for payment of the back taxes.
Attempts by the Debtor to have the expired tax exemption restored
was denied by the New York City Department of Housing and
Preservation Development. The Debtor believes that filing the
chapter 11 case is the only viable alternative to preserve and
maximize the value of its real property for the benefit of all its
creditors by enabling the Debtor to liquidate its assets in an
orderly manner for the highest and best value.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has continued in the operation
of its business in the ordinary course of business. In July 2016,
the YMCA surrendered its lease, vacated the Premises and removed
its operations as a Youth Center across the street from the real
property. The Debtor has taken possession and control of the space
(basement and first through thirds floors) previously occupied by
the YMCA at the Premises.

To the best of its knowledge and belief, as of the Petition Date,
the Debtor has 5 creditors asserting liens against its assets,
including the Premises as follows:

          a. The Debtor and HPD are parties to a First Mortgage on
the Premises, dated Nov. 25, 1987, recorded Aug. 1, 1989 at Reel
1606, in the original amount of $828,903;

          b. The Debtor and HPD are parties to a Subordinate
Mortgage on the Premises, dated Nov. 25, 1987, recorded Aug. 1,
1987 at Reek 1606, in the original amount of $686, 400. The secured
claim of HPD is valid, undisputed and constitute a valid and
enforceable lien and security interest in the Premises, subordinate
to the First Mortgage. The HPD First Mortgage and Subordinate
Mortgage claims is approximately $1,515,000, plus interest;

          c. The Debtor is indebted to the NYCTL 1998-2 and 2013-A
Trusts and Bank of New York Mellon as Collateral Agent and
Custodian for nonpayment of New York City real property taxes with
respect to (i) Tax Lien Certificate No. 1A made by The City of New
to The Bank of New York Mellon, dated Aug. 8, 2013 in
CRFN:2013000318672; and (ii) Tax Lien Certificate No 1B made by The
City of New to The Bank of New York Mellon, dated Aug. 12, 2015 in
CRFN: 2015000294856. The combined lien claims of the trusts on the
Petition Date was approximately $4,200,000;

          d. The Debtor is indebted to the NYC Department of
Finance, as evidence by the filing of a real property tax lien
against the Premises. The approximate amount due to the Department
of Finance is $351,130; and

          e. The Debtor is indebted to The NYC Water Board for the
statutory water and sewer charges resulting in a lien against the
Premises. The approximate amount due to the Water Board is
$170,920.

In addition to the secured liens, the Debtor is a party to a
Declaration of Covenants II and Restrictive Covenants as
described:

          a. Declaration of Covenant II, dated as of Nov. 25, 1987,
between the Debtor and The City of New York, which governs (i) the
procedures for rent registration of Lower Income Units, (ii) income
restrictions on prospective tenants of Lower Income Units, (iii)
certifications of annual income of all tenants of Lower Income
Units and (iv) the remedy of The City of New York in the event of a
violation of the Declaration of Covenants. This Declaration of
Covenants is subject to the 2 mortgages of the Premises between the
Debtor and HPD;

          b. Restrictive Covenant, dated as of July 31, 1993,
between the Debtor and the YMCA with regard to the YMCA's creation
and use of the Youth Center, its purposes, limitations on use
restrictions, non-profit status and obligation upon sale; and

          c. Housing Development Grant Covenants Addendum, dated
Oct. 27, 1987, between The City of New York, the Debtor and the
YMCA, restricting the Debtor and the YMCA for 20 years period from
(i) converting any units at the Premises to condominiums or
cooperative ownership, (ii) barring discrimination against
prospective tenants on the bases of eligibility for housing
assistance or minor children and (iii) establishing the number and
criteria for Lower Income Units and tenants.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has investigated several means
of disposing of the Premises for the benefit of the estate. Only
181 expressed interest acquiring the Premises as a "stalking horse"
bidder.

The Debtor has agreed to the terms of the Contract of Sale which
contemplates the purchase and sale of the Debtor's Premises to
Buyer or its designee, subject to higher and better offers.

A copy of the Contract of Sale attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/Reverend_24_Sales.pdf

Salient provisions of the Contract of Sale are:

          a. Purchased Asset: Real property known as and situated
at 179-183 West 135th Street, New York, New York, also known as 181
West 135th Street, New York, New York and Section 7, Block 1920,
Lot 7.

          b. Purchase Price: $9,000,000

          c. Bid Deposit: $1,150,000

          d. Closing Date: 30 days from the date of entry of Order
approving the sale.

          e. Terms: "as is," "where is," without representation or
warranty, free and clear of all liens, covenants, claims, interests
and encumbrances.

Other conditions of the sale require that immediately upon
consummation of the sale, the Premises' name will be changed. In
connection with sale of the Premises under the Contract of Sale,
the Buyer and the Debtor will execute customary transfer documents,
the form of which will be agreed to between signing and closing,
including, without limitation, a Bill of Sale.

The Debtor has utilized and requests the Court approve its proposed
Bidding Procedures for the Premises in the Sale Order, which
include, among others, the following:

          a. Participation Requirements: Each interested person or
entity must deliver (i) a Good Faith Deposit of $900,000; and (ii)
proof of financial wherewithal to consummate a sale transaction.

         b. Deposit Requirements: Potential bidder must deposit
with the Debtor a Good Faith Deposit.

         c. Qualification of Bids: A bid received from a potential
bidder that meets the requirements will be considered a qualified
bid and each potential bidder that submits a qualified bid will be
considered a qualified bidder. The Buyer is a qualified bidder and
the Contract of Sale executed by the Buyer is a qualified bid.

          d. Baseline Bid: Prior to the auction, the Debtor will
select the highest or best qualified bid or qualified bids for the
assets to serve as the starting point at the sale.

          e. Time and Place for Sale: At the offices of Debtor's
counsel, Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, LLP, 156 West 56th Street,
22nd Floor, New York, New York. The auction date is to be
scheduled. Only a qualified bidder who has submitted a qualified
bid will be eligible to participate at the sale.

          f. Selection of Successful Bid: At the Sale Hearing, the
Debtor will present the successful bid to the Court for approval.

          g. Return of Deposit: The Good Faith Deposit of all
qualified bidders will be held in escrow by the Debtor, and with
respect to the Buyer, will be held by the Referee until its release
to Debtor's counsel, and will not become property of the Debtor's
bankruptcy estate absent further order of the Court. The Debtor
will retain the Good Faith Deposit of the successful bidder and the
party with the next higher or otherwise best bid until the closing
of the sale transaction. Upon the return of the Good Faith Deposit,
their respective owners will receive any and all interest that will
have accrued thereon.

The Debtor believes that the proposed Bidding Procedures provide an
appropriate framework for selling the Premises and will enable the
Debtor to review, analyze and compare all bids received to
determine which bid and combination of bids is in the best
interests of the Debtor's estate and creditors.

The Debtor is proceeding by Order scheduling a hearing on shortened
notice rather than by notice of motion because the Debtor believes
that approval of the sale and scheduling of the auction sale and
Sale Hearing must occur as soon as possible. Any delay will only
diminish the value that can be realized by the Debtor's estate from
the sale of the Premises. Therefore, waiver of the 14-day stay
would help to maximize the value received by the Debtor's estate.

The Purchaser is represented by:

          A. Mitchell Greene, Esq.
          ROBINSON BROG LEINWAND GREENE
          GENOVESE & GLUCK P.C.
          875 Third Avenue, 9th Floor
          New York, NY 100122
          Telephone: (212) 603-6399
          Facsimile: (212) 956-2164

              About Reverend C.T. Walker Housing Development Fund

Reverend C.T. Walker Housing Development Fund Corp. operates its
business through Prestige Management, Inc., its proposed real
property management company. Since its formation in 1986, the
company has been in the business of providing affordable,
low-income housing for individuals and families at 179-183 West
135th Street, New York, New York.

Reverend C.T. Walker Housing Development Fund Corp. sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. Case No. 16-43014) on July 7, 2016.
Judge Elizabeth S. Stong presides over the case.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million.

The Debtor tapped Charles E Simpson, Esq. at the Windels Marx Lane
& Mittendorf, LLP as counsel.

The petition was signed by Rev. Reginald L. Bachus, president.


REVEREND C.T. WALKER: Has $8M Contract to Sell NY Properties
------------------------------------------------------------
Reverend C.T. Walker Housing Development Fund Corp. asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to authorize
the Contract of Sale in connection with the sale of real property
located at 179-183 West 135th Street, New York, also known as 181
West 135th Street, New York, and Section 7, Block 1920, Lot 7
("Premises"), to 181 West 135th, LLC, or its designee, for
$9,000,000, subject to higher and better offers.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Sept. 22, 2016 at 12 p.m. The
objection deadline is Sept. 15, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. (EST).

The Debtor operates its business at the Premises through Prestige
Management, Inc., its proposed real property management company.
Since its formation in 1986, the company has been in the business
of providing affordable, low-income housing for individuals and
families at the Premises. In addition, as part of its acquisition
and financing of repairs at its business location provided space to
the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater New York ("YMCA")
for operation of its "Youth Center" under a perpetual lease with an
annual rent of $1.

The Debtor was compelled to file for chapter 11 relief because of
its severe financial distress.  The source of the Debtor's
financial troubles can be attributed to a single factor, the
expiration of the Debtor's J-51 real property tax exemption for the
Premises ("Tax Exemption").  Before the Petition Date, the Debtor's
operation had been incurring losses as a result of the loss of the
Tax exemption of about $250,000 per year for the past 10 years.  As
of the Petition Date, the Debtor was losing approximately $20,000
per month on average and could not continue to sustain such losses.
Furthermore, prepetition The City of New York commenced a tax lien
foreclosure proceeding against the Debtor through the sale of a tax
lien certificate on the real property to Bank of New York Mellon as
Custodian and Agent of 2 trusts for payment of the back taxes.
Attempts by the Debtor to have the expired tax exemption restored
was denied by the New York City Department of Housing and
Preservation Development.  The Debtor believes that filing the
chapter 11 case is the only viable alternative to preserve and
maximize the value of its real property for the benefit of all its
creditors by enabling the Debtor to liquidate its assets in an
orderly manner for the highest and best value.
Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has continued in the operation
of its business in the ordinary course of business.  In July 2016,
the YMCA surrendered its lease, vacated the Premises and removed
its operations as a Youth Center across the street from the real
property.  The Debtor has taken possession and control of the space
(basement and first through thirds floors) previously occupied by
the YMCA at the Premises.

To the best of its knowledge and belief, as of the Petition Date,
the Debtor has 5 creditors asserting liens against its assets,
including the Premises as follows:

   a. The Debtor and HPD are parties to a First Mortgage on the
Premises, dated Nov. 25, 1987, recorded Aug. 1, 1989 at Reel 1606,
in the original amount of $828,903;

   b. The Debtor and HPD are parties to a Subordinate Mortgage on
the Premises, dated Nov. 25, 1987, recorded Aug. 1, 1987 at Reek
1606, in the original amount of $686, 400. The secured claim of HPD
is valid, undisputed and constitute a valid and enforceable lien
and security interest in the Premises, subordinate to the First
Mortgage. The HPD First Mortgage and Subordinate Mortgage claims is
approximately $1,515,000, plus interest;

   c. The Debtor is indebted to the NYCTL 1998-2 and 2013-A Trusts
and Bank of New York Mellon as Collateral Agent and Custodian for
nonpayment of New York City real property taxes with respect to (i)
Tax Lien Certificate No. 1A made by The City of New to The Bank of
New York Mellon, dated Aug. 8, 2013 in CRFN:2013000318672; and (ii)
Tax Lien Certificate No 1B made by The City of New to The Bank of
New York Mellon, dated Aug. 12, 2015 in CRFN: 2015000294856. The
combined lien claims of the trusts on the Petition Date was
approximately $4,200,000;

   d. The Debtor is indebted to the NYC Department of Finance, as
evidence by the filing of a real property tax lien against the
Premises.  The approximate amount due to the Department of Finance
is $351,130; and

   e. The Debtor is indebted to The NYC Water Board for the
statutory water and sewer charges resulting in a lien against the
Premises.  The approximate amount due to the Water Board is
$170,920.

In addition to the secured liens, the Debtor is a party to a
Declaration of Covenants II and Restrictive Covenants as
described:

   a. Declaration of Covenant II, dated as of Nov. 25, 1987,
between the Debtor and The City of New York, which governs (i) the
procedures for rent registration of Lower Income Units, (ii) income
restrictions on prospective tenants of Lower Income Units, (iii)
certifications of annual income of all tenants of Lower Income
Units and (iv) the remedy of The City of New York in the event of a
violation of the Declaration of Covenants. This Declaration of
Covenants is subject to the 2 mortgages of the Premises between the
Debtor and HPD;

   b. Restrictive Covenant, dated as of July 31, 1993, between the
Debtor and the YMCA with regard to the YMCA's creation and use of
the Youth Center, its purposes, limitations on use restrictions,
non-profit status and obligation upon sale; and

   c. Housing Development Grant Covenants Addendum, dated Oct. 27,
1987, between The City of New York, the Debtor and the YMCA,
restricting the Debtor and the YMCA for 20 years period from (i)
converting any units at the Premises to condominiums or cooperative
ownership, (ii) barring discrimination against prospective tenants
on the bases of eligibility for housing assistance or minor
children and (iii) establishing the number and criteria for Lower
Income Units and tenants.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has investigated several means
of disposing of the Premises for the benefit of the estate.  Only
181 expressed interest acquiring the Premises as a "stalking horse"
bidder.

The Debtor has agreed to the terms of the Contract of Sale which
contemplates the purchase and sale of the Debtor's Premises to
Buyer or its designee, subject to higher and better offers.

A copy of the Contract of Sale attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/Reverend_24_Sales.pdf

The salient provisions of the Contract of Sale are:

   a. Purchased Asset: Real property known as and situated at
179-183 West 135th Street, New York, New York, also known as 181
West 135th Street, New York, New York and Section 7, Block 1920,
Lot 7.

   b. Purchase Price: $9,000,000

   c. Bid Deposit: $1,150,000

   d. Closing Date: 30 days from the date of entry of Order
approving the sale.

   e. Terms: "as is," "where is," without representation or
warranty, free and clear of all liens, covenants, claims, interests
and encumbrances.

Other conditions of the sale require that immediately upon
consummation of the sale, the Premises' name will be changed.  In
connection with sale of the Premises under the Contract of Sale,
the Buyer and the Debtor will execute customary transfer documents,
the form of which will be agreed to between signing and closing,
including, without limitation, a Bill of Sale.

The Debtor has utilized and requests the Court approve its proposed
Bidding Procedures for the Premises in the Sale Order, which
include, among others, the following:

   a. Participation Requirements: Each interested person or entity
must deliver (i) a Good Faith Deposit of $900,000; and (ii) proof
of financial wherewithal to consummate a sale transaction.

   b. Deposit Requirements: Potential bidder must deposit with the
Debtor a Good Faith Deposit.

   c. Qualification of Bids: A bid received from a potential bidder
that meets the requirements will be considered a qualified bid and
each potential bidder that submits a qualified bid will be
considered a qualified bidder.  The Buyer is a qualified bidder and
the Contract of Sale executed by the Buyer is a qualified bid.

   d. Baseline Bid: Prior to the auction, the Debtor will select
the highest or best qualified bid or qualified bids for the assets
to serve as the starting point at the sale.

   e. Time and Place for Sale: At the offices of Debtor's counsel,
Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, LLP, 156 West 56th Street, 22nd
Floor, New York, New York.  The auction date is to be scheduled.
Only a qualified bidder who has submitted a qualified bid will be
eligible to participate at the sale.

   f. Selection of Successful Bid: At the Sale Hearing, the Debtor
will present the successful bid to the Court for approval.

   g. Return of Deposit: The Good Faith Deposit of all qualified
bidders will be held in escrow by the Debtor, and with respect to
the Buyer, will be held by the Referee until its release to
Debtor's counsel, and will not become property of the Debtor's
bankruptcy estate absent further order of the Court.  The Debtor
will retain the Good Faith Deposit of the successful bidder and the
party with the next higher or otherwise best bid until the closing
of the sale transaction.  Upon the return of the Good Faith
Deposit, their respective owners will receive any and all interest
that will have accrued thereon.

The Debtor believes that the proposed Bidding Procedures provide an
appropriate framework for selling the Premises and will enable the
Debtor to review, analyze and compare all bids received to
determine which bid and combination of bids is in the best
interests of the Debtor's estate and creditors.

The Debtor is proceeding by Order scheduling a hearing on shortened
notice rather than by notice of motion because the Debtor believes
that approval of the sale and scheduling of the auction sale and
Sale Hearing must occur as soon as possible.  Any delay will only
diminish the value that can be realized by the Debtor's estate from
the sale of the Premises.  Therefore, waiver of the 14-day stay
would help to maximize the value received by the Debtor's estate.

The Purchaser is represented by:

          A. Mitchell Greene, Esq.
          ROBINSON BROG LEINWAND GREENE
          GENOVESE & GLUCK P.C.
          875 Third Avenue, 9th Floor
          New York, NY 100122
          Telephone: (212) 603-6399
          Facsimile: (212) 956-2164

                    About Reverend C.T. Walker
                     Housing Development Fund

Reverend C.T. Walker Housing Development Fund Corp. operates its
business through Prestige Management, Inc., its proposed real
property management company. Since its formation in 1986, the
company has been in the business of providing affordable,
low-income housing for individuals and families at 179-183 West
135th Street, New York, New York.

Reverend C.T. Walker Housing Development Fund Corp. sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-43014) on July 7, 2016.
Judge Elizabeth S. Stong presides over the case.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million.

The Debtor tapped Charles E Simpson, Esq. at the Windels Marx Lane
& Mittendorf, LLP as counsel.

The petition was signed by Rev. Reginald L. Bachus, president.


SAMSON RESOURCES: BE Aviation Offers $2.75M for Learjet 45XR
------------------------------------------------------------
Samson Resources Corp. and affiliates, ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to authorize the sale of Learjet
45XR, Serial No. 45-306 ("Airplane"), to BE Aviation, LLC ("Buyer")
for $2,750,000.

The Debtors engaged JBA Aviation, Inc., as a broker ("Broker"). The
efforts undertaken by the Broker have borne out the value of the
proposed sale.

On April 11, 2016, the Debtors filed the Debtors Motion for Entry
of an Order Authorizing Debtors to Sell Aircraft Free and Clear of
All Liens, Claims, and Encumbrances. On April 29, 2016, the Court
entered the Order Authorizing Debtors to Sell Aircraft Free and
Clear of All Liens, Claims, and Encumbrances ("First Order")
approving the sale of the Aircraft to Avpro, Inc. ("Initial Buyer")
on the terms set forth in the letter of intent ("First Letter of
Intent") attached to the First Order.

The First Letter of Intent provided that after executing a mutually
agreeable purchase and sale agreement, the Initial Buyer would have
the opportunity to conduct an inspection and either accept or
reject the Aircraft in its sole discretion. Unfortunately, the
Initial Buyer determined not to pursue the transaction after its
inspection.  Despite this setback, the Debtors found a replacement
buyer and now, based on the second letter of intent ("Letter of
Intent"), wish to enter into a purchase and sale agreement
("Purchase Agreement") with BE Aviation.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Samson_Resources_1307_Sales.pdf

The salient terms of the Purchase Agreement are:

   a. Purchased Asset: Learjet 45XR, Serial No. 45-306

   b. Purchase Price: $2,750,000

   c. Deposit: $100,000

   d. Closing Date: Sept. 21, 2016

   e. Transaction Cost and Expenses: Buyer and Seller will each pay
50% of all escrow fees.

   f. Terms: Free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances

The Debtors will owe the Broker 2 percent of the gross sales price,
or $55,000, in exchange for its services, plus reimbursement of
certain expenses in the amount of approximately $5,000.  In an
effort to best position the sale for success and circumvent the
risk of the Buyer backing out of the transaction, under the terms
of the Letter of Intent, the Buyer does not have the opportunity to
reject the Aircraft now that the Purchase Agreement is executed.
Rather, the Buyer was allowed to review the inspection report and
test the Aircraft prior to executing the Purchase Agreement.

The Debtors believe that the proposed sale properly maximizes value
for their stakeholders while efficiently capitalizing on the
Buyer's interest in purchasing the Aircraft.  The Debtors' estates
will be relieved of ongoing liabilities associated with owning the
Aircraft, including lease payments for the hangar in which the
Aircraft is stored, insurance premiums, salary and benefits of the
staffed pilot and contracted co-pilots, maintenance fees, and
licensing obligations.  Moreover, the Debtors' estates will receive
a direct cash influx from the Buyer by consummating the sale, which
the Debtors have agreed to segregate on account of the Aircraft
being unencumbered.  Therefore, a separate, court-supervised
marketing and auction process is not necessary and would be highly
cost-inefficient.

The Purchaser can be reached at:

          Stewart H. Jones, Manager
          BE AVIATION, LLC
          c/o Jones Industrial Holdings, Inc.
          2200 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 1250
          Houston, TX 77056
          Telephone: (713) 600-9300
          E-mail: sjones@jonesindustrial.com

                      About Samson Resources

Samson Resources Corporation, et al., filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-11934) on Sept. 16, 2015.
Philip W. Cook, the executive vice president and CFO, signed the
petition.  The Debtors estimated assets and liabilities of more
than $1 billion.

Samson is an onshore oil and gas exploration and production company
with interests in various oil and gas leases primarily
located in Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, and
Wyoming.  The Operating Companies operate, or have royalty or
working interests in, approximately 8,700 oil and gas production
sites.

Samson was acquired by KKR and Crestview from Charles Schusterman
in December 2011 for approximately $7.2 billion.  The investor
group provided approximately $4.1 billion in equity investments as
part of the purchase price.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP represents the Debtors as general counsel.
Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP is the Debtors' local counsel.

Alvarez & Marsal LLC acts as the Debtors' financial advisor.
Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P. serves as the Debtors'
Investment banker.  Garden City Group, LLC, serves as claims and
noticing agent to the Debtors.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, appointed three
creditors of Samson Resources Corp. and its affiliated debtors to
serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors.  The
Committee has tapped White & Case LLP as counsel and Farnan LLP as
local counsel.

                          *     *     *

The Debtors, on May 16, 2016, filed a new debt-for-equity Chapter
11 Plan, a copy of whose Disclosure Statement is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/SAMSONds0517.pdf

The Plan contemplates an exchange of First Lien Claims for new
first lien debt (including commitments under a new reserve-based
revolving credit facility), Cash (including proceeds from Asset
Sales, if any), and new common equity.

In a subsequent filing, the Creditors Committee submitted a motion
in court seeking the termination of the Debtors' exclusivity
periods to file, and solicit acceptances for that, a Chapter 11
plan.  As reported in the May 26, 2016 edition of The Troubled
Company Reporter, the Committee claimed that "the Debtors' Amended
Plan on file represents a no win choice for unsecured creditors:
vote for the plan and get less than one would in a Chapter 7
liquidation; fight the plan and either get nothing or end up six
months down the road with no plan and administrative expenses
running out of control."



SAMUEL WYLY: SEC Eyes Contempt for Failure to Pay $101-Mil.
-----------------------------------------------------------
The American Bankruptcy Institute, citing Nate Raymond of Reuters,
reported that the U.S. securities regulators said they want the
executor of Charles Wyly's estate held in contempt for failing to
pay the $101.2 million owed as a result of the late Texas
businessman's fraud.

According to the report, in a letter filed in Manhattan federal
court, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said Donald
Miller, Charles Wyly's son-in-law, had taken no steps in his role
as executor to pay the sum after being ordered to do so in February
2015.

The SEC said the estate had failed to seek a stay of the judgment
pending appeals by it and former billionaire Sam Wyly, Charles
Wyly's brother, of a federal jury's verdict two years ago finding
them liable for securities fraud, the report related.

The commission asked U.S. District Judge Paul Oetken to order
Miller to demonstrate why the estate could not pay the sum, and to
hold him in contempt if he failed to do so, the report further
related.

The SEC said it would also seek an order requiring the repatriation
of sufficient assets from offshore trusts at issue in the case to
pay the judgment, the report said.  Those trusts have a net worth
of $350 million, the SEC said, citing Charles Wyly's widow, the
report added.

The case is U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wyly et al,
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 10-5760.

                    About Sam Wyly

Sam Wyly is a lifelong entrepreneur and author.  His first book,
1,000 Dollars & An Idea, is a biography that tells his story of
creating and building companies, including University Computing,
Michaels Arts & Crafts, Sterling Software, and Bonanza Steakhouse.
His second book, Texas Got It Right!, co-authored with his son,
Andrew, was gifted to roughly 450,000 students and teachers,
thought leaders, and readers, and continues to be a best-seller in
its Amazon category.

Samuel Wyly filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
N.D. Tex. Case No. 14-35043) on Oct. 19, 2014, weeks after a judge
ordered him to pay several hundred million dollars in a civil
fraud case.  In September 2014, a federal judge ordered Mr. Wyly
and the estate of his deceased brother to pay more than $300
million in sanctions after they were found guilty of committing
civil fraud to hide stock sales and nab millions of dollars in
profits.

                    About Caroline Wyly

Caroline Wyly is the widow of business tycoon Charles Wyly.  She
and her brother-in-law Sam Wyly sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection as leverage to settle a looming tax bill and a $329
million claim from the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Her
bankruptcy is In re Caroline D. Wyly, 14-35074, in U.S. Bankruptcy
Court, Northern District Texas (Dallas).


SANDERS NURSERY: Exclusive Solicitation Period Extended to Nov. 28
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Tom R. Cornish of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Oklahoma extended Sanders Nursery & Distribution
Center, Inc.'s exclusive period for obtaining acceptance of its
chapter 11 plan of reorganization from August 30, 2016 to November
28, 2016.

The Debtor previously sought the extension of its exclusive
solicitation period, contending that BFN Operations, LLC had filed
an objection to the confirmation of the Debtor's Plan and sought
authority to propose a competing plan.  The Debtor contended that
it needed an extension of its exclusive period for obtaining
acceptance of its plan to allow sufficient time to complete its
prosecution of the plan.  The Debtor further contended that it
intends to utilize the extended Exclusivity Period to prepare for a
contested confirmation hearing, including conducting additional
discovery, and attempt to negotiate with BFN Operations regarding
the potential for a mutually acceptable, consensual resolution of
this case.

         About Sanders Nursery & Distribution Center, Inc.

Headquartered in Tahlequah, Oklahoma, Sanders Nursery &
Distribution Center, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. E.D. Okla. Case No. 15-81312) on Dec. 4, 2015.
The petition was signed by Burl Berry, vice president.

Judge Tom R. Cornish presides over the case.  Brandon Craig Bickle,
Esq., at Gable & Gotwals, P.C., serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.

The Debtor estimated its assets and liabilities at $1 million to
$10 million at the time of the filing.



SCORPION PERFORMANCE: Has Until Oct. 26 to File Plan
----------------------------------------------------
Judge Paul M. Glenn of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida extended Scorpion Performance, Inc.'s exclusive
period to file a plan of reorganization and solicit acceptances to
the plan, to October 26, 2016 and December 25, 2016, respectively.

The Debtor previously sought the extension of its exclusive periods
to file a plan of reorganization and solicit acceptances to the
plan, contending that it needed an extension of the Exclusivity
Periods until the Court sets the deadlines for the sale of its
assets, and rule on the Sale Motion and the consummation of the
proposed transaction.

               About Scorpion Performance, Inc.

Scorpion Performance, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
M.D. Fla., Case No. 15-05579) on December 30, 2015.  The petition
was signed by Angela M. Stopiano, president.

The Debtor has tapped Jon Polenberg, Esq., at Polenberg Cooper PLLC
as its legal counsel.

The Debtor disclosed assets at $3.93 million and debts at $1.36
million.



SEQUENOM INC: Camber Capital Sells Entire Stake to LabCorp
----------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Camber Capital Management LLC and Stephen DuBois
disclosed that as of Sept. 6, 2016, they ceased to beneficially own
any shares of common stock of Sequenom, Inc.

As previously disclosed, the Reporting Persons review their
holdings in the Company on a continuing basis.  On Sept. 6, 2016,
the Reporting Persons tendered all of their shares of the Company
to Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings in connection with
LabCorp's offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of the
Company in a cash tender offer pursuant to a definitive agreement
and plan of merger, dated July 26, 2016, between LabCorp and the
Company.

The Reporting Persons sold 17,325,000 Shares to LabCorp on
Sept. 6, 2016, at a price of $2.40 per share in connection with the
tender offer.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                     https://is.gd/gAxfJr

                         About Sequenom

Sequenom, Inc. (NASDAQ: SQNM) -- http://www.sequenom.com/-- is a  

life sciences company committed to improving healthcare through
revolutionary genetic analysis solutions.  Sequenom develops
innovative technology, products and diagnostic tests that target
and serve discovery and clinical research, and molecular
diagnostics markets.  The company was founded in 1994 and is
headquartered in San Diego, California.

Sequenom reported a net loss of $16.3 million on $128 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to net
income of $1.01 million on $152 million of total revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, Sequenom had $97.3 million in total assets,
$152 million in total liabilities and a $54.5 million total
stockholders' deficit.


SEQUENOM INC: Common Stock Delisted From NASDAQ
-----------------------------------------------
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a Form 25-NSE Notification of Removal from Listing
and/or Registration under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, to effect the delisting of shares of the
Sequenom, Inc.'s common stock from NASDAQ.

As a result of the Company's merger with Laboratory Corporation of
America Holdings, and Savoy Acquisition Corp., the Company no
longer fulfills the numerical listing requirements of the NASDAQ
Global Select Market.  

The Company's common stock, which previously traded under the
symbol "SQNM", ceased to be traded on NASDAQ prior to the opening
of trading on Sept. 7, 2016.  In addition, the Company intends to
file with the SEC a Certification on Form 15 under the Exchange Act
requesting the Shares be deregistered and that the Company's
reporting obligations under Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Exchange Act be terminated.

                        About Sequenom

Sequenom, Inc. (NASDAQ: SQNM) -- http://www.sequenom.com/-- is a  

life sciences company committed to improving healthcare through
revolutionary genetic analysis solutions.  Sequenom develops
innovative technology, products and diagnostic tests that target
and serve discovery and clinical research, and molecular
diagnostics markets.  The company was founded in 1994 and is
headquartered in San Diego, California.

Sequenom reported a net loss of $16.3 million on $128 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to net
income of $1.01 million on $152 million of total revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, Sequenom had $97.3 million in total assets,
$152 million in total liabilities and a $54.5 million total
stockholders' deficit.


SEQUENOM INC: Consummates Merger With LabCorp
---------------------------------------------
Sequenom, Inc., closes its merger agreement with Laboratory
Corporation of America Holdings, and Savoy Acquisition Corp., a
direct wholly owned subsidiary of LabCorp ("Purchaser"), on Sept.
7, 2016.

As previously disclosed, the parties entered into an Agreement and
Plan of Merger on July 26, 2016.  Pursuant to the Merger Agreement,
on Aug. 9, 2016, the Purchaser commenced a tender offer to purchase
all outstanding shares of the Company's common stock, including the
associated preferred stock purchase rights at a price of $2.40 per
share, net to the seller in cash, without interest and subject to
applicable tax withholding, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, dated Aug. 9, 2016,
and in the related Letter of Transmittal.

LabCorp announced that the offering period of the Offer had expired
at 12:01 a.m., Eastern time, on Sept. 7, 2016, and that as of that
time, based on the information provided by the depositary for the
Offer, 82,901,857 Shares were validly tendered and not withdrawn
prior to the expiration of the offering period (including Shares
tendered through notices of guaranteed delivery), representing
approximately 69% of the outstanding Shares as of that time (or
approximately 67% of outstanding Shares excluding notices of
guaranteed delivery), which Shares were sufficient to have met the
minimum condition of the Offer and to enable the Merger to occur
under Delaware law without a vote of the Company's stockholders.
On Sept. 7, 2016, Purchaser accepted for payment, and paid for, all
Shares validly tendered and not properly withdrawn during the
offering period.

On Sept. 7, 2016 pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and
following the completion of the offering period, the Purchaser
merged with and into the Company upon the filing on that date of a
certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation
and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of LabCorp.  In the Merger,
Shares not tendered and accepted for payment in the Offer (other
than Shares owned by LabCorp, Purchaser or the Company and Shares
held by stockholders who are entitled to demand, and who properly
perfect their appraisal rights with respect to such Shares) were
converted into the right to receive the same $2.40 per Share, net
to the holder in cash, without interest and subject to applicable
tax withholding, paid in the Offer.

Each of the Company's stock options that were outstanding and
unexercised as of immediately prior to the Effective Time and held
by an individual who, as of the Effective Time, was an active
employee, director or consultant of the Company, accelerated and
became fully vested and exercisable effective immediately prior to
the Effective Time.  As of the Effective Time, each Company Option
that was then outstanding and unexercised was cancelled and
converted into the right to receive cash (without interest) in an
amount equal to the product of (i) the total number of Shares
subject to the vested portion of such Company Option immediately
prior to the Effective Time (taking into account any acceleration
of vesting), multiplied by (ii) the excess, if any, of (x) the
Merger Consideration over (y) the exercise price payable per Share
under such Company Option.  No holder of a Company Option that had
an exercise price per Share that was equal to or greater than the
Merger Consideration was entitled to any payment with respect to
such cancelled Company Option before or after the Effective Time.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each restricted stock unit
providing for settlement in Shares that was outstanding as of
immediately prior to the Effective Time and held by an individual
who, as of the Effective Time, was an active employee, director or
consultant of the Company, accelerated and became fully vested
effective immediately prior to the Effective Time.  In lieu of any
issuance of Shares in settlement of such Company RSU, as of the
Effective Time, each Company RSU that was outstanding was cancelled
and converted into the right to receive cash (without interest) in
an amount equal to the product of (i) the total number of Shares
issuable in settlement of the vested portion of such Company RSU
immediately prior to the Effective Time (taking into account any
acceleration of vesting) multiplied by (ii) the Merger
Consideration.

Each award of Shares that was subject to vesting or forfeiture or
repurchase by the Company that was outstanding as of immediately
prior to the Offer Acceptance Time accelerated and became fully
vested such that the Company's right of reacquisition or
repurchase, as applicable, lapsed in full effective immediately
prior to the Offer Acceptance Time.  As of the Offer Acceptance
Time, each Share underlying each Company Restricted Stock Award was
treated as an outstanding Share for purposes of the Merger
Agreement, including for purposes of tendering pursuant to the
Offer.

The total consideration to be paid is expected to be approximately
$300 million, of which approximately $200 million has been paid by
Purchaser in accordance with the terms of the Offer for Shares that
were validly tendered and not properly withdrawn in the offering
period.  These amounts exclude fees and expenses related to the
Offer and the Merger.  LabCorp provided the Purchaser with
sufficient funds to purchase all Shares accepted for payment in the
offering period of the Offer and all shares purchased in the
Merger.

In connection with the closing of the Merger, Sequenom and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association entered into a First Supplemental
Indenture, dated as of Sept. 7, 2016, to the Indenture, dated as of
Sept. 17, 2012, between the Company and the Trustee, relating to
the Company's 5.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017, and a First
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of Sept. 7, 2016, to the
Indenture, dated as of June 9, 2015, between the Company and the
Trustee, relating to the Company's 5.00% Convertible Exchange
Senior Notes due 2018.

Each of the Supplemental Indentures provides that, at and after the
effective time of the Merger, for all conversions in respect of the
applicable series of Notes that occur after the effective time of
the Merger, the right to convert each $1,000 principal amount of
the 2017 Notes or the 2018 Notes, as applicable, into shares of
common stock of the Company and cash in lieu of fractional shares
of common stock will be changed into the right to convert such
principal amount of such Notes into a number of "Units of Reference
Property" (i.e., the per share Merger Consideration) of $2.40 in
cash equal to the Conversion Rate (as defined in the Indentures,
respectively) in effect prior to the effective time of the Merger
and an amount of cash in lieu of any fractional Unit of Reference
Property equal to the product of (i) such fractional Unit of
Reference Property and (ii) $2.40 in cash.

                        About Sequenom

Sequenom, Inc. (NASDAQ: SQNM) -- http://www.sequenom.com/-- is a  

life sciences company committed to improving healthcare through
revolutionary genetic analysis solutions.  Sequenom develops
innovative technology, products and diagnostic tests that target
and serve discovery and clinical research, and molecular
diagnostics markets.  The company was founded in 1994 and is
headquartered in San Diego, California.

Sequenom reported a net loss of $16.3 million on $128 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to net
income of $1.01 million on $152 million of total revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, Sequenom had $97.3 million in total assets,
$152 million in total liabilities and a $54.5 million total
stockholders' deficit.


SEQUENOM INC: Eight Directors Resigned
--------------------------------------
Effective as of Sept. 7, 2016, each of Kenneth F. Buechler, Myla
Lai-Goldman, Richard A. Lerner, Ronald M. Lindsay, David Pendarvis,
Catherine J. Mackey, Charles P. Slacik and Dirk van den Boom
resigned as a director of Sequenom, Inc., and from any committees
of the Company's Board of Directors on which they then served.  In
addition, pursuant to the Merger Agreement and effective as of
immediately after the Effective Time, on Sept. 7, 2016, Glenn A.
Eisenberg, Samuel F. Eberts III, Sandra D. van der Vaart, William
B. Haas and Benjamin R. Miller were appointed to the Board of
Directors of the Company.

Further, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, effective as of the
Effective Time, on Sept. 7, 2016, Samuel F. Eberts III became
chairperson, president and secretary of the Company, replacing Dirk
van den Boom as chief executive officer, president and principal
executive officer of the Company, and Glenn A. Eisenberg became
executive vice president and treasurer of the Company, replacing
Carolyn D. Beaver as senior vice president and chief financial
officer and principal financial and accounting officer of the
Company.

Each of Glenn A. Eisenberg and Samuel F. Eberts III is an officer
of LabCorp.  

                       About Sequenom

Sequenom, Inc. (NASDAQ: SQNM) -- http://www.sequenom.com/-- is a  

life sciences company committed to improving healthcare through
revolutionary genetic analysis solutions.  Sequenom develops
innovative technology, products and diagnostic tests that target
and serve discovery and clinical research, and molecular
diagnostics markets.  The company was founded in 1994 and is
headquartered in San Diego, California.

Sequenom reported a net loss of $16.3 million on $128 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to net
income of $1.01 million on $152 million of total revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, Sequenom had $97.3 million in total assets,
$152 million in total liabilities and a $54.5 million total
stockholders' deficit.


SOFINTEK INC: Court Authorizes Cash Collateral Use
--------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert J. Faris of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Guam authorized Sofintek Inc., d.b.a. Skydrenaline Zone to use
Cash Collateral, including existing bank deposits, accounts
receivable and cash proceeds from its ongoing business operations,
to meet normal and customary operating expenses associated with the
Debtor's business.

The authorization to use Cash Collateral was effective as of June
22, 2016,

Judge Faris required the Debtor to account for all expenditures and
receipts to the creditors in its monthly operating reports, and to
incur no expenses out of the ordinary course of business without
the prior written consent of the Court.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated September 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/Bnth7D


                         About Sofintek Inc.

Sofintek Inc., d.b.a. Skydrenaline Zone, filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D. Guam Case No. 1:16-bk-00072) on June
24, 2016.  Mark Williams, Esq., at The Law Office of Mark E.
Williams, P.C., serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel. The
petition was signed by Eutemio Ohno, president.  

Judge Robert J. Faris presides over the case.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on July 15 appointed three creditors
of Sofintek Inc. to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.  The committee members are: (1) Reaction Co., Daniel J.
Berman, and Michael K. Stephenson.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated assets at $500,001 to
$1 million and liabilities at $500,000 to $1 million.  


SOUTHERN SEASON: Can Use Cash to Pay for Trailing Expenses
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Benjamin A. Kahn of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, authorized Southern Season, Inc. to use
cash collateral on a final basis.

The Debtor was authorized to use cash collateral to pay Permitted
Trailing Expenses, subject to the terms of the Court's Sale Order.
The Debtor was further authorized to use cash collateral to pay
expenditures other than Permitted Trailing Expenses, solely if it
receives the express written consent of SummitBridge National
Investments IV, LLC, and the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors, or by further Order of the Court.

A full-text copy of the Final Order, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/mfQEwP

                    About Southern Season

Southern Season, Inc., was founded in 1975 and is a premier retail
destination for specialty food and gifts. It currently operates its
flagship retail store located in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, and
its three "Taste of Southern Season" stores in Asheville, Raleigh,
North Carolina and Charleston, South Carolina.

Southern Season sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case No. 16-80558) on June 24,
2016. The petition was signed by Clay Hammer, CEO.

On Aug. 8, 2016, John Fioretti of ABTV was appointed as the
Debtor's Chief Restructuring Officer. The CRO has the full and
complete authority to manage the affairs of the Debtor.

The Debtor is represented by John Paul H. Cournoyer, Esq., at
Northen Blue, LLP, and Richard M. Hutson, II, Esq., at Hutson Law
Offices, P.A. The case is assigned to Judge Benjamin A. Kahn.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $9.82 million in
assets and $18.3 million in liabilities.


STEVE MURPHY: Unsecureds to be Paid from Cash on Hand
-----------------------------------------------------
Steve and Celeste Murphy's Third Amended Disclosure Statement
explaining their Plan of Liquidation dated Sept. 6, 2016, propose
to pay unsecured non-priority creditors, owed $6,157,050, 100% of
their claim from the current cash on hand.

The Debtors own a portfolio of real estate holdings and currently
holds cash in the amount of $12,637,000 consisting of sales
proceeds of $10,000,000 from the sale of 23 of the minority
interests the Debtor owned, approximately $800,000 from the sales
of real estate that occurred during the time the case was opened,
and $1,837,500 from the sale of 7 LLC Interests which was approved
by the Court on August 11, 2016. These funds are currently being
held in the Debtor in Possession account.

Because of limitations in the Operating Agreements and the lapse of
the period in which the Joint Stipulation allowed the marketing of
the Membership Interests, only the Non Debtor Members could
purchase the 7 Membership Interests in which the Debtor had a
minority interest. The Court approved the sale of the 7 LLC
Interests on August 11, 2016. for the purchase price of $1,837,500
pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreements.

The Debtors' Second Amended Disclosure Statement provided that
Unsecured Non-Priority Creditors will be paid in full, 85% of their
claim from the Proceeds of the current cash on hand and the balance
from liquidation of the remaining Debtors Property.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/13-80740-358.pdf

                  About Steve and Celeste Murphy

Steve Murphy and Celeste Murphy filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 13-80740) on March 7, 2013.
The case judge is the Hon. Thomas M. Lynch.  Michael J. Davis at
BKN Murray LLP serves as the Debtors' counsel.


SYDELL INC: Hires J. Michael Levengood as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Sydell, Inc. dba Spa Sydell seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to employ the
Law Office of J. Michael Levengood, LLC as counsel.

The Debtor requires counsel to:

   (a) advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties as
       a Debtor and Debtor-in-possession in the continued
       management and operation of its business and property;

   (b) attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of
       creditors and other parties in interest and advise and
       consult on the conduct of the Chapter 11 Case, including
       all of the legal and administrative requirements of
       operating in Chapter 11;

   (c) take necessary action to protect and preserve the Debtor's
       estate, including the prosecution of actions on their
       behalf, the defense of any actions commenced against the
       estates, negotiations concerning all litigation in which
       the Debtor may be involved and objections to claims filed
       against the estate;

   (d) review and prepare on behalf of the Debtor all documents
       and agreements as they become necessary and desirable;

   (e) review and prepare on behalf of the Debtor all motions,
       administrative and procedural applications, answers,
       orders, reports and papers necessary to the administration
       of the estate;

   (f) negotiate and prepare on the Debtor's behalf a plan of
       reorganization, disclosure statement and all related
       agreements and/or documents and take any necessary action
       on behalf of the Debtor to obtain confirmation of such
plan;

   (g) review and object to claims; analyze, recommend, prepare,
       and bring any causes of action created under the Bankruptcy
  
       Code;

   (h) advise the Debtor in connection with any sale of assets;

   (i) appear before this Court, any appellate courts, and the
       U.S. Trustee, and protect the interests of the Debtor's
       estate before such courts and the U.S. Trustee; and

   (j) perform all other necessary legal services and give all
       other necessary legal advice to the Debtor in connection
       with this Chapter 11 Case.

Mr. Levengood will be compensated at $395 per hour.

Mr. Levengood will be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Mr. Levengood received retainer payments from the Debtor totaling
$13,000 for work to be done with respect to this Chapter 11 case,
against which the Firm has applied $5,280.50. The Firm currently
holds a balance of $7,719.50 as an advance payment for services to
be rendered and expenses to be incurred in connection with its
representation of the Debtor.

Mr. Levengood assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estate.

Mr. Levengood can be reached at:

       John Michael Levengood, Esq.
       LAW OFFICE OF J. MICHAEL LEVENGOOD, LLC
       150 S. Perry Street, Suite 208
       Lawrenceville, GA 30046
       Tel: (678) 765-1745
       Fax: (678) 606-5031
       E-mail: mlevengood@levengoodlaw.com

                About Sydell, Inc. d/b/a Spa Sydell

Sydell Inc. d/b/a Spa Sydell filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Ga. Case No. 09-83407) on September 3, 2009.  The petition was
signed by Reina Bermudez, authorized individual.  The Debtor is
represented by David G. Bisbee, Esq., at the Law Office of David G.
Bisbee.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1,000,001
to $10,000,000 at the time of the filing.


TAMARA MELLON: Files $4MM Breach of Contract Suit v. Jimmy Choo
---------------------------------------------------------------
Y. Peter Kang, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reported Tamara
Mellon, the co-founder of women's luxury shoe brand Jimmy Choo,
filed a $4 million breach-of-contract suit against her former
employer in New York state court, accusing it of coercing a boycott
by artisan shoemakers in order to disrupt her rival startup.  Ms.
Mellon claims Jimmy Choo PLC and related entities breached an
employment agreement signed when the brand was acquired by Labelux
Group GmbH in 2011.

                          Tamara Mellon

Tamara Mellon Brand, LLC, is headquartered in New York, New York.
Tamara Mellon is a Jimmy Choo co-founder.  Ms. Mellon set up her
eponymous label in 2013, after severing ties with Jimmy Choo.

The Company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 15-12420) on Dec. 2, 2015, estimating its assets and
liabilities at $1 million and $10 million each.  The petition was
signed by Tamara Mellon, CEO.

Derek C. Abbott, Esq., and Daniel B. Butz, Esq., at Morris,
Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP serve as the Company's bankruptcy
counsel.


THIRTEEN EAST: Directed to Submit Proposed Order for Cash Use
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christopher J. Panos of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts directed Thirteen East Main Corporation
to submit a Proposed Order granting the Use of Cash Collateral on
an interim basis.

The Troubled Company Reporter had reported earlier that the Debtor
sought authorization to use rental income generated by the Property
to maintain its finances and to provide necessary funding for its
continued reorganization, such as maintaining the properties,
making the required mortgage payments and providing for payments to
utilities.  The Debtor proposed a Budget that covers the months of
August 2016 through October 2016, providing for total expenses in
the amount of $2,025 for each of the months of August through
October.


                    About Thirteen East Main Corporation

Thirteen East Main Corporation filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 16-41294) on July 22, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Nathan Till, president.  The Debtor is
represented by James P. Ehrhard, Esq. at Ehrhard & Associates, PC.
The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $100,001 to $500,000
at the time of the filing.

Judge Christopher J. Panos presides over the case.


TOM GJURAJ: Ch. 11 Plan Proposes $15K Payment to Unsecureds
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tom Gjuraj filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Connecticut a first amended disclosure statement proposing to pay
each creditor holding a a non-priority unsecured allowed claim its
pro rata share of $650 without interest for six years for a total
of $15,600.

Allowed unsecured claims based on a review of unsecured claims are
estimated at
approximately $155,317.

The Debtor is an individual residing in Norwalk, Connecticut.  His
assets relating to real estate include a multifamily property
located at 66 Lockwood Stamford, Connecticut, a residence located
at 37 Hillwood Place, Norwalk, Connecticut, and his interest in
Gjuraj Holdings, LLC, which owns a multifamily property located at
46 Saint Mathias Street, in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

As a result of a reduced income, in part due to the loss of
tenants, the Debtor fell behind on payments on the mortgage for his
Residence and the Property, resulting in two foreclosure actions
being commenced against him.  In an effort to save both his
Residence and the Property, the Debtor commenced the Chapter 11
case.

On the effective date, the automatic stay under Section 362 of the
Bankruptcy Code will not be in effect so Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
which holds a $689,435 secured claim, can pursue its rights under
applicable non-bankruptcy law to seek title to the Debtor's
residence.  The Debtor intends to continue pursuing a loan
modification with Wells Fargo outside of bankruptcy.

The Debtor intends to primarily use his income, rental income and
income from his company as necessary to further the payments under
the Plan.

A redlined version of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
Sept. 6, 2016, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/15-51297-109.pdf

Tom Gjuraj filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No.
15-51297) on September 14, 2015, and is represented by Matthew K.
Beatman, Esq., at Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C., in Bridgeport,
Connecticut.


TPP ACQUISITION: Meeting to Form Creditors' Panel Set for Sept. 13
------------------------------------------------------------------
William K. Harrington, United States Trustee for Region 13, will
hold an organizational meeting on Sept. 13, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. in
the bankruptcy case of TPP Acquisition, Inc.

The meeting will be held at:

         Office of the U. S. Trustee Program
         Earl Cabell Federal Building
         1100 Commerce Street, Room 976
         Dallas, Texas 75242

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.
Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.



TPP ACQUISITION: Wants $46.8-Mil. DIP Loan From Monroe Capital
--------------------------------------------------------------
TPP Acquisition, Inc. d/b/a The Picture People, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas for
authorization to obtain postpetition financing from DIP Lenders
Monroe Capital Corporation and Monroe Capital Partners Fund, LP,
and DIP Agent Monroe Capital Management Advisors, LLC, and use cash
collateral.

The Debtor is indebted to Monroe Capital Management Advisors, LLC,
as Prepetition Agent, and Monroe Capital Partners Fund, LP and
Monroe Capital Corporation, as lenders, in the amount of $41.2
million, plus interest accrued and accruing at the default rate,
costs, expenses, fees, other charges and other obligations,
including, without limitation, on account of cash management,
credit card, depository, investment, leasing, hedging and other
banking or financial services secured by the Prepetition Financing
Documents.  To secure the prepetition debt, the Debtor granted
continuing security interests and liens to the Prepetition Agent
and the Prepetition Lenders upon substantially all of its property,
including all or substantially all of the Debtor's cash collateral,
which consists of all amounts on deposit in the Debtor's banking,
checking, or other deposit accounts and all proceeds of the
prepetition collateral, to secure the Prepetition Debt.

The material provisions of the DIP Facility, among others, are:

     (a) Borrowing Limit: The DIP Credit Facility shall consist of
a $46.8 million senior secured superpriority term loan credit
facility.

     (b) Fees:

          (i) DIP Closing Fee: $100,000

          (ii) Unused Line Fee: 0.5% per annum

     (c) Termination Date:  All obligations under the DIP Credit
Facility, accrued or otherwise, will be due and payable in full on
the earliest of:

          (i) December 31, 2016;

          (ii) the date of consummation of a sale and/or other
disposition, including any dispositions pursuant to
court-authorized going-out-of- business sale, of all or
substantially all of the working capital assets of the Debtor under
Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code; or

          (iii) the effective date of any plan.

     (d) Interest Rates:  Borrower agrees to pay interest on the
unpaid principal amount of each Loan for the period commencing on
the date of such Loan until such Loan is paid in full as follows:

          (i) at all times while such Loan is a Base Rate Loan, at
a rate per annum equal to the sum of the Base Rate from time to
time in effect plus the Applicable Margin for Base Rate Loans; and

          (ii) at all times while such Loan is a LIBOR Loan, at a
rate per annum equal to the sum of the LIBOR Rate applicable to
each Interest Period for such Loan plus the Applicable Margin for
LIBOR Loans.

     (e) Use of Proceeds:  Upon entry of the Interim Order, the
proceeds of the DIP Credit Facility will be used to finance:

          (i) the payment of transaction expenses;

          (ii) the payment of fees, expenses and costs incurred in
connection with the Debtor’s chapter 11 cases subject to the
Budget;

          (iii) the payment of any adequate protection payments
approved in the Interim Order or Final Order; and

          (iv) working capital, capital expenditures, and other
general corporate purposes of the Debtor subject to the Budget and
any permitted variance.

          (v) Upon entry of the Final Order, in addition to the
above, the proceeds of the DIP Credit Facility will be used for the
repayment of all indebtedness, other than letters of credit, under
the Prepetition Credit Agreement.

     (f) Adequate Protection:  The Prepetition Secured Lenders
shall receive the following adequate protection:

  
          (i) replacement liens and security interests on the DIP
Collateral, subject only to the Carve Out and the DIP Liens,, only
to the extent of any diminution in the value of the Collateral;

         (ii) an adequate protection super-priority administrative
claim under Section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, subject to the
Carve Out and the DIP Superpriority Claim, only to the extent of
any diminution in the value of the Prepetition Collateral;

        (iii) payment of all accrued and unpaid interest at the
non-default rate under the Prepetition Credit Agreement;

         (iv) reimbursement on a current basis, for all reasonable
and documented out-of-pocket costs and expenses of the financial
advisors and outside attorneys engaged by the Prepetition Agent and
Prepetition Lenders, solely to the extent permitted under the
Prepetition Credit Agreement;

          (v) funded escrow accounts in the sum of $250,000 to
secure any contingent indemnification obligations under the
Prepetition Credit Agreement; and

         (vi) access to the Debtor’s records and regular
reporting, including in connection with the sale process.

The DIP Credit Agreement provides for Sale Process Milestones,
which requires the Debtor to, among other things:

     (1) obtain entry of the Interim Order on or before the day
that is 6 calendar days after the Petition Date;
     
     (2) obtain entry of the Final Order on or before the day that
is 30 calendar days after entry of the Interim Order;

     (3) obtain entry of an order approving bidding procedures on
or before the day that is 21 calendar days after the Petition
Date;

  
     (4) receive binding bids for the consummation of a 363 Sale on
or before October 24, 2016;

     (5) conduct an auction with respect the Sale Motion on or
before October 26, 2016;

     (6) conduct a hearing and obtain entry of an order approving
the sale of the Debtor’s assets under the Sale Motion on or
before October 28, 2016;

     (7) achieve entry of an order of the Court approving the sale
to the highest and/or best bidder on or before October 31, 2016;
and

     (8) consummate the Sale by November 4, 2016.

The Debtor tells the Court that its need to use Cash Collateral and
to obtain credit pursuant to the DIP Facility is immediate and
critical in order to enable the Debtor to continue operations and
to administer and preserve the value of its estate.  The Debtor
further tells the Court that its ability to maintain business
relationships with landlords, vendors, suppliers and customers, to
pay its employees, and to otherwise finance operations requires the
availability of capital from the DIP Facility and the use of Cash
Collateral, the absence of any of which would immediately and
irreparably harm the Debtor, its estate, creditors and equity
holders, and the possibility for a successful reorganization.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/oXfjn9

TPP Acquisition, Inc., d/b/a The Picture People, is represented
by:

          Robert D. Albergotti, Esq.
          Ian T. Peck, Esq.
          Jarom J. Yates, Esq.
          HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
          2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
          Dallas, TX 75219
          Telephone: (214) 651-5000
          E-mail: robert.albergotti@haynesboone.com
                  ian.peck@haynesboone.com
                  jarom.yates@haynesboone.com

Monroe Capital Management Advisors LLC can be reached at:

          MONROE CAPITAL LLC
          311 South Wacker Drive, Suite 6400
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Attention: Nathan Harrell
          Telephone: (312) 523-2378

Monroe Capital Management Advisors LLC is represented by:

          Donald E. Rothman, Esq.
          RIEMER & BRAUNSTEIN LLP
          Three Center Plaza
          Boston, MA 02108
          Telephone: (617) 880-3556
                    
      About TPP Acquisition, Inc., d/b/a The Picture People

TPP Acquisition, Inc. d/b/a The Picture People filed a chapter 11
petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 16-33437-hdh-11) on Sept. 2,
2016.  The Debtor is represented by Robert D. Albergotti, Esq., Ian
T. Peck, Esq., and Jarom J. Yates, Esq., at Haynes and Boone, LLP.


TROJE'S TRASH: Sale of Assets to Vermillion for $5.3M Approved
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Kathleen H. Sanberg of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Minnesota authorized Troje's Trash Pick-Up, Inc., to
sell substantially all assets to Vermillion State Bank for
$5,300,000, payable by credit bid under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 363(k).

The sale is free and clear of any and all liens, claims,
encumbrances and interests of any kind or nature whatsoever.

An auction was conducted on Aug. 8, 2016.

Assets included in the sale are the Debtor's cash, cash
equivalents, securities and investments.

                   About Troje's Trash Pick-Up

Troje's Trash Pick-Up Inc. is a trash hauler with a principal place
of business at 6010 S. Concord Blvd., Inver Grove Heights,
Minnesota.  It also conducts a roll-off business.

Troje's Trash Pick-Up filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Minn.
Case No. 16-30037) on Jan. 7, 2016.  The petition was signed by
Dennis Troje, president.

The Debtor is represented by Steven Nosek, Esq., at Steven B.
Nosek, P.A.  The case is assigned to Judge Kathleen H. Sanberg.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million.


UNITED MOBILE: Can Use Cash Collateral Until Nov. 17
----------------------------------------------------
Judge Barbara Ellis-Monro of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Georgia authorized United Mobile Solutions,
LLC, to use cash collateral on a final basis, through Nov. 17,
2016.

The Debtor contended that Respondents T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al.,
may assert an interest in the Debtor's cash collateral.  The Debtor
further contended that it required the use of cash collateral to
pay its payroll, purchase inventory and pay its other operating
expenses.

The approved Budget covered the months of September through
November, and provided for total expenses in the amount of $595,171
for September; $635,291 for October; and $663,386 for November.

Respondents T-Mobile USA, Inc., et. al., were granted, among
others, a security or consignment interest in, and lien upon all
the postpetition property of the Debtor and the estate, and all
proceeds thereof to the same extent, validity, amount and priority
as Respondents' prepetition security or consignment interests and
liens upon such collateral.

A full-text copy of the Final Order, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/DuJRvw
              
                   About United Mobile Solutions

United Mobile Solutions, LLC, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Ga. Case No. 16-62537) on
July 20, 2016.  The Debtor is a carrier master dealer that operates
and manages approximately 20 retail cellular phone stores. The
Debtor's corporate offices are located in Norcross, Georgia.  The
Debtor is represented by Cameron M. McCord, Esq., at Jones &
Walden, LLC. T he Debtor estimated its assets at less than $50,000
and its liabilities at more than $1 million at the time of the
filing.


UNIVERSAL NUTRIENTS: Has Interim Approval to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mark X. Mullin of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas, authorized Universal Nutrients, LLC to obtain
post-petition financing from Exeter International, LLC, and use
cash collateral on an interim basis.

Judge Mullin granted the Debtor's Motion on the same terms and
conditions and with all attendant forms of security and adequate
protection set forth in the Court's Interim Order, through and
including the final hearing on the Debtor's Motion which is
scheduled on September 6, 2016 at 11:00 a.m.

Judge Mullin held that only the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors has standing to object to the final approval of the
Debtor's Motion, and that such objections, if any, will be limited
to the following issues:

     (1) The amount of Carve-out that will be available to the
Official Committee and its professionals and any limitations or
exclusions from such carve-out;

     (2) Exclusion of section 506(c) charges against the Lender’s
collateral;

     (3) The period for the Committee to review the prepetition
claims and liens of the Lender;

     (4) Granting Lender a lien against any Chapter 5 causes of
action under the Bankruptcy Code;

     (5) Any indemnification of the Lender by the estate or the
Debtor; and

     (6) Any payment of Lender's fees.

The Official Committee has until 9:00 a.m., on Sept. 6, 2016, to
file its written objections.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is
available at https://is.gd/R9MjPP

Exeter International, LLC is represented by:

          Joe E. Marshall, Esq.
          5001 Spring Valley Road, Suite 400 E
          Dallas, TX 75244-3910
          Telephone: (972) 393-3900
          E-mail: jmarshall@marshalllaw.net    
          
                   About Universal Nutrients

Universal Nutrients, LLC filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 16-43070) on August 5, 2016.  The petition was signed
by Chet Burks, manager.  The Debtor is represented by Richard W.
Ward, Esq.  The case is assigned to Judge Mark X. Mullin.  The
Debtor estimated assets and debts at $10 million to $50 million at
the time of the filing.

The Debtor is a Texas limited liability company engaged in the
business under the tradename of Uni*Well of manufacturing and
developing various nutraceutical products, OTC pharmaceuticals, and
specialty biochemicals with expertise in development and
fulfillment of productivity products, functional shots, sports
nutrition, nutrient deficiency products, elderly nutrition,
children's nutrition, gender-specific nutrition, energy products,
anti-stress products, anti-aging products, internal beauty
products, and condition-specific products in the form of liquids,
powders, gels, tablets, and capsules.  The Debtor has its principal
office at 14801 Sovereign Dr., Fort Worth, Texas 76155 and is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Universal Group Holdings, LLC, a Texas
limited liability company.



UTSTARCOM HOLDINGS: Smart Soho, et al., Amend Purchase Agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Gu Guoping, Shanghai Phicomm Communication Co., Ltd.,
Phicomm Technology (Hong Kong) Co., Limited and The Smart Soho
International Limited disclosed that as of Sept. 2, 2016, they
beneficially owned 11,739,932 ordinary shares, par value US$0.00375
per share, of UTStarcom Holdings Corp., representing 32.2 percent
of the shares outstanding.

On Sept. 2, 2016, The Smart Soho International Limited or
"Acquirer", Phicomm HK and the Sellers entered into a further
amendment to the Purchase Agreement dated Nov. 4, 2015.  Pursuant
to the Fifth Amendment, the parties to the Purchase Agreement
agreed that the closing under the Purchase Agreement will take
place as soon as practicable as will be agreed among the parties to
the Purchase Agreement, but in no event later than Oct. 31, 2016
(the "New Termination Date").

In connection with the execution and delivery of the Fifth
Amendment, Acquirer released to the Shah Sellers the sum of
US$1,000,000 previously deposited in the escrow account established
pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to the Purchase Agreement,
together with any interest earned thereon.  The Fifth Amendment
provides that if the closing does not occur by the New Termination
Date and the Purchase Agreement is terminated due to a failure by
either the Acquirer or any Seller to perform any covenant or
satisfy any condition to be performed or satisfied by applicable
party, no party will be subject to any penalty, termination fee
obligation or any other liability or obligation to the other
parties under the Purchase Agreement.

Pursuant to the Fifth Amendment, each party and persons acting on
behalf of a party may initiate or encourage the sale of any
Ordinary Shares held by such party to one or more potential
purchasers, participate in discussions or negotiations regarding
such sales, to furnish information and take other action to
facilitate inquiries or proposals that could reasonably be expected
to lead to those potential sales with the option, in each party's
sole discretion, to sell and transfer such Ordinary Shares to a
purchaser or purchasers.  However, no party may enter into or
conclude a Third Party Deal prior to the New Termination Date.

The Fifth Amendment also continues the standstill provisions
entered into in connection with the Third Amendment until the
earlier of the closing under, and termination of, the Purchase
Agreement, and the Shah Sellers also agreed to extend the duration
of their consent to Phicomm's and Acquirer's share pledges to the
Fund until the closing date under the Purchase Agreement.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                   https://is.gd/SaylSw

                   About UTStarcom, Inc.

UTStarcom, Inc. (Nasdaq: UTSI) -- http://www.utstar.com/-- is a
global leader in IP-based, end-to-end networking solutions and
international service and support.  The Company sells its
solutions to operators in both emerging and established
telecommunications markets around the world.  UTStarcom enables
its customers to rapidly deploy revenue-generating access services
using their existing infrastructure, while providing a migration
path to cost-efficient, end-to-end IP networks.  The Company's
headquarters are currently in Alameda, California, with its
research and design operations primarily in China.

UTStarcom reported a net loss of $20.7 million on $117 million of
net sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss
of $30.3 million on $129 million of net sales for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014.


VALERITAS HOLDINGS: Liquidity Issues Raise Going Concern Doubt
--------------------------------------------------------------
Valeritas Holdings, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $10.47 million on $4.88 million of net revenues for the three
months ended June 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $16.15
million on $4.60 million of net revenues for the same period in
2015.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company listed a net
loss of $27.36 million on $9.89 million of net revenues, compared
to a net loss of $40.67 million on $8.75 million of net revenues
for the same period in the prior year.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $48.73 million in total
assets, $67.52 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $18.79 million.

The Company has incurred losses each year since inception and has
experienced negative cash flows from operations in each year since
inception.  As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $20.4 million in
cash and cash equivalents and an accumulated deficit of $405.2
million.  The Company's restructured senior secured debt includes a
liquidity covenant whereby the Company must maintain a cash balance
greater than $5.0 million.

The Company's cash balance will not be sufficient to satisfy the
Company's operations for the next 12 months from June 30, 2016 or
maintain its liquidity covenant, which raises substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at the SEC at:

                  https://is.gd/Ew1tay

Valeritas Holdings, Inc., (formerly Cleaner Yoga Mat, Inc.) is a
commercial-stage medical technology company focused on developing
innovative technologies to improve the health and quality of life
of people with Type 2 diabetes.  The Company designed its first
commercialized product, the V-Go Disposable Insulin Delivery
Device, or V-Go, to help patients with Type 2 diabetes who require
insulin to achieve and maintain their target blood glucose goals.
V-Go is a small, discreet and easy-to-use disposable insulin
delivery device that a patient adheres to his or her skin every 24
hours.  V-Go enables patients to closely mimic the body's normal
physiologic pattern of insulin delivery throughout the day and to
manage their diabetes with insulin without the need to plan a daily
routine around multiple daily injections.


VANGUARD HEALTHCARE: Regulators Sue Over Quality of Care
--------------------------------------------------------
Katy Stech, writing for The Wall Street Journal Pro Bankruptcy,
reported that health regulators have sued nursing-home chain
Vanguard Healthcare LLC, accusing it of providing poor patient care
at some of its 13 locations, costing government insurance programs
tens of millions of dollars.

According to the report, in their lawsuit, officials from the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services said the Brentwood, Tenn.,
company provided a level of patient care "that caused serious
physical and emotional harm to highly vulnerable elderly, disabled
and low-income residents at [its] facilities."

In the case at hand, government officials are pushing for the
nursing-home operator to pay the government about $56.5 million in
damages, the report related.

Specifically, the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in
Nashville, Tenn., said Vanguard provided "nonexistent, grossly
substandard and/or worthless" patient care between January 2010 and
December 2015, the report further related.  The company had billed
state and federal insurance programs, which paid for some
residents' care, the report said.

William L. Norton III, Vanguard Healthcare's bankruptcy lawyer,
told WSJ the company denies wrongdoing and that its facilities have
passed recent inspections.  He said he intends to fight the bill of
about $56.5 million submitted by program administrators, WSJ
added.

                   About Vanguard Healthcare

Vanguard is a long-term care provider headquartered in Brentwood,
Tennessee, providing rehabilitation and skilled nursing services at

14 facilities in four states (Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee and
West Virginia).

Vanguard Healthcare, LLC and 17 of its subsidiaries each filed
a?Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. M.D Tenn. Lead Case
No.?16-03296) on May 6, 2016.  The petitions were signed by
William D. Orand, the CEO.  Vanguard estimated assets in the
range of $100 million to $500 million and liabilities of up to $100

million.

The Debtors have hired Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP as counsel

and BMC Group as noticing agent.

The Hon. Randal S. Mashburn is the case judge.

The U.S. trustee for Region 8 on May 24 appointed seven creditors
of Vanguard Healthcare, LLC, to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors, which is represented by Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
as its legal counsel and CohnReznick LLP as financial advisor.

The United States Trustee for Region 8 has appointed Laura E.
Brown
as Patient Care Ombudsman for Vanguard Healthcare, LLC.


VINOD GOPAL PATEL: Sept. 21 Disclosure Statement Hearing
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Erik P. Kimball of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida will convene a hearing on Sept. 21, 2016, at
2:00 p.m., to consider approval of the disclosure statement
explaining Vinod Gopal Patel's plan.

Deadline for objections to the Amended Disclosure Statement are due
Sept. 14.

The Debtor's Aug. 31, 2016 Amended Disclosure Statement, a
full-text copy of which is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/13-80740-358.pdfproposes that holders of
Allowed Unsecured Claims against the Debtor will receive in full
satisfaction, release and exchange for the Allowed Claim, Pro Rata
and pari passu participation, monthly prorate distributions of 100%
of the Projected Disposable Income that will be paid under the plan
during a five year period.  The Debtor has determined that after
payment of his monthly obligations to Class 1 Allowed Priority
Claims, consisting of the Internal Revenue Service's $2,508 claim,
and Class 2 Allowed Secured Claim of Banesco USA, all necessary
living expenses, at this time, a surplus of $250 per month
remains.

The Debtor manages a hotel and believes that the current operations
can support his salary and a disposable income that will fund the
payments under the proposed plan.

Vinod Gopal Patel, a hotel manager, sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 16-13703) on
March 16, 2016, and is represented by Joe M. Grant, Esq., and Adam
D. Marshall, Esq., at Marshall Socarras Grant P.L., in Boca Raton,
Florida.


WEST CABINET: Court Allows Cash Collateral Use Through Oct. 31
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Gregory R. Schaaf of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Kentucky authorized West Cabinet, Inc. to use
cash collateral from Sept. 1, 2016 through Oct. 31, 2016.

The approved Budget covers the months of September and October, and
provides for total expenses in the amount of $66,949 for September
and $62,864 for October.  The expenses provided for in the Budget
include accounting fees, in the amount of $100 for each month;
legal fees, in the amount of $1,000 for each month; and United
States Trustee fees, in the amount of $325 for each month, among
others.

The Debtor was directed to make monthly adequate protection
payments to the Internal Revenue Service in the amount of $400.

The Cash Collateral Creditor was granted replacement liens in
postpetition collateral, subject only to any valid and enforceable,
perfected, and non-avoidable liens of other secured creditors.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated Sept. 2, 2016, is available at
https://is.gd/L7QMLS
              
                     About West Cabinet

West Cabinet, Inc., sought protection under chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case No. 16-60324) on March 25,
2016.  The petition was signed by Mary Beth Golden, vice-president.
The Debtor is represented by Jamie L. Harris, at DelCotto Law
Group PLLC.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its
assets and debts at less than $1 million.


WEST TEXAS: Auction of $2M Worth of Assets Denied
-------------------------------------------------
Judge Ronald B. King of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Texas denied West Texas Poly & Pump, LLC's sale of
personal property via an auction using PPL Group, LLC.

The assets proposed to be sold are described as substantially all
assets.

A copy of the list of assets to be sold attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/West_Texas_56_Sales.pdf

The Debtor's opinion of estimated sale proceeds from said auction
will be $2,000,000.

The personal property is encumbered by a lien in the approximate
amount of $1,500,000 held by Prosperity Bank.

                 About West Texas Poly and Pump

West Texas Poly and Pump, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
W.D. Tex. Case No. 16-70059) on April 26, 2016.  Judge Ronald B.
King is assigned to the case.  The Debtor estimated assets in the
range of $1 million to $10 million and $500,000 to $1 million in
debt.  James Samuel Wilkins, Esq., at Willis & Wilkins, LLP, serves
as the Debtor's counsel.  The petition was signed by Brian Burris,
CEO.


WILLIAM DEL BIAGGIO: 9th Circ. Affirms Freeman Claim Subordination
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned  LIQUIDATING TRUST COMMITTEE OF THE DEL
BIAGGIO LIQUIDATING TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID FREEMAN,
Defendant-Appellant, No. 13-17500 (9th Cir.), the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the order of the
district court affirming the bankruptcy court's judgment in
properly subordinating Freeman's claim under Section 510(b).

David Freeman filed a general unsecured claim against Del Biaggio's
bankruptcy estate seeking damages of an undetermined amount arising
from his fraud in the Holdings transaction. In a later amended
proof of claim, Freeman sought damages of $38,632,075. This amount
included Freeman's initial $31 million investment in Holdings
securities, the $5 million of subordinated debt he issued to
Holdings in exchange for the promissory note, and the $2,632,075
paid in the first capital call. In response, the Liquidating Trust
Committee of the Del Biaggio Liquidating Trust, the entity charged
with prosecuting claims objections in Del Biaggio's bankruptcy,
filed a counterclaim against Freeman and sought summary judgment.
The counterclaim sought subordination and disallowance of Freeman's
claim based on 11 U.S.C. Section 510(b).

The bankruptcy court granted the Committee's motion for summary
judgment, finding Freeman's claim was subject to mandatory
subordination under Section 510(b). After determining that Holdings
was an "affiliate" of Del Biaggio via his ownership in Forecheck,
the court concluded that Section 510(b) applied to Freeman's fraud
claim because the plain language of the statute covers claims
arising from the purchase of the securities of a debtor's
affiliate. The bankruptcy court further reasoned that subordinating
Freeman's claim under Section 510(b) served the purposes of the
statute, because as an investor in Holdings, he bargained for both
a greater share of profits and a greater share of risks than Del
Biaggio's unsecured creditors. The court also determined that the
claims of Del Biaggio's other creditors were senior to Freeman's
claim based on its conclusion that notes or shares issued by a
subsidiary create no claim to the assets of a parent. Freeman
appealed to the district court, which in turn affirmed the order
and judgment of the bankruptcy court. Freeman timely appealed
here.

A full-text copy of the Opinion dated August 22, 2016 is available
at https://is.gd/H1MtRM from Leagle.com.

Merle C. Meyers, Esq. -- mmeyers@meyerslawgroup.com and Michele
Thompson, Esq. -- mthompson@meyerslawgroup.com -- Meyers Law Group,
P.C., San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Appellant.

Michael M. Lauter, Esq. -- mlauter@sheppardmullin.com, Michael H.
Ahrens, Esq. -- mahrens@sheppardmullin.com and Steven B. Sacks,
Esq. -- ssacks@sheppardmullin.com -- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter &
Hampton LLP, San Francisco, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

                 About William del Baggio

Menlo Park, California-based BDB Management LLC and its affiliates
filed for Chapter 11 protection on June 7, 2008 (Bankr. N.D.
Calif. Lead Case No. 08-31001).  William J. del Biaggio, III, an
interest holder of the companies, filed for personal chapter 11
bankruptcy on June 6, 2008.  Judith Whitman, Esq., at Diemer
Whitman and Cardosi LLP, represents the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  When the Debtors filed for protection from
their creditors, they listed $50 million to $100 million in
assets and $50 million to $100 million in debts.

The TCR reported on July 9, 2008, that Sara L. Kistler, acting
U.S. Trustee for Region 17, appointed R. Todd Nelson as the
chapter 11 trustee in BDB Management LLC and its debtor-
affiliates' bankruptcy cases.

Sand Hill Capital Partners III, the investment fund that Mr. Del
Biaggio co-founded, also filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy.  Sand
Hill disclosed $10.6 million in debts.  Established in 1996, Sand
Hill Capital has four debt funds under management, of which two
are actively investing.  Sand Hill has provided debt financing and
equity co-investing in multiple portfolio companies of top-tier
venture capital firms, including Broadcom, a semiconductor company
specializing in VoIP, wireless networking, and broadband
communications solutions; Commerce One, a provider of On-Demand
Supplier Relationship Management solutions and The Open Supplier
Network; IBahn, a provider of secure broadband-to-go at premium
hospitality locations; and Odwalla, maker of fruit drinks and
snacks.


WRIGHTWOOD GUEST: Sale of Los Angeles County Property Approved
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Scott C. Clarkson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California authorized the Chapter 11 Trustee of
Wrightwood Guest Ranch, LLC, to sell parcels of land located in Los
Angeles County, California to GREF-Wrightwood, LLC for $8,500,000.

A copy of the legal description of the property attached to the
Order is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Wrightwood_Guest_378_Order.pdf

A sale hearing was held on July 19, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.

The sale of the property is free and clear of all liens, claims and
interests in such property other than the Senior Permitted liens,
including without limitation (i) the asserted lien(s) of Lee Smith
recorded Aug. 6, 2015 as Instrument Nos. 15-962790, 15-962791,
15-962792, 15-962793, 15-962794, 15-962795, 15-962796, 15-962798,
15-962799, 15-962800, 15-962801 and Aug. 26, 2015 as Instrument
Nos. 15-1054051, 15-1054052; and (ii) the asserted lease of
Wrightwood Canopy Tour, LLC disclosed by Memorandum of Lease
recorded Dec. 19, 2011 as Instrument No. 2011-1715126.

The property, as of the closing date, will remain subject to the
following liens and claims: (i) that certain deed of trust senior
to GreenLake Real Estate Fund LLC's lien or liens recorded July 3,
2006 as Instrument No. 06-1463204 in favor of Countrywide Bank,
N.A. (now known as or assigned to Bank of America, N.A.), but only
as to Parcel 3 (APN 3065-006-019); (ii) a deed of trust senior to
GreenLake's lien or liens recorded Dec. 28, 2006 as Instrument No.
06-2882180 in favor of Cal-X-Inc., a California corporation, which
according to public records was assigned to the Reid K. Alexander
Family Trust dated Nov. 7, 1996 by assignment recorded Jan. 30,
2008 as Instrument No. 20080179044, but only as to Parcel 2 (APN
3065-006-017); (iii) a deed of trust senior to GreenLake's lien or
liens recorded February 17, 2009 as Instrument No. 20090213059 in
favor of Ralph Rocca Construction, but only as to Parcel 1 (APN
3065-033-019); and (iv), subject to the abstract of judgment of
SWG, Inc. recorded Aug. 31, 2015 as Instrument No. 15-1074713 and
the mechanic's lien recorded Oct. 24, 2011 as Instrument No.
2011438024, ("Permitted Senior Liens").

No executory contract or unexpired lease of any portion of the
property under which the Debtor was the lessor or a party, is being
assumed or assigned.

The 14-day stay period set forth in Rule 6004(h) of the Federal
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure is waived.

                   About Wrightwood Guest Ranch

Wrightwood Guest Ranch LLC, a California limited liability company,
provides recreational services such as Snow Play, Zip Line,
endurance races, logging and other outdoor events at a 300-acre
property it owns in Wrightwood area of Los Angeles County.  WGR
also operates a wedding and special event center at a 2.45-acre
property at Wrightwood area.

WGR is 60% owned by Richard and Judy Halllett and 40% owned by GREF
WGR I, LLC, an affiliate of secured creditor GreenLake Real Estate
Fund, LLC.  WGR owns 100% of the interests in Wrightwood Guest
Ranch Holdings, LLC, which in turns owns 100% of the interests in
Wrightwood Canopy Tours, LC.

Being concerned about GreenLake's threat of foreclosure, unsecured
creditors Masterpiece Marketing, Larry Rundle, and Snyder
Dorenfeld, filed an involuntary petition against Wrightwood Guest
Ranch LLC (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 15-17799) on Aug. 5, 2015.
The Petitioners' counsel is Douglas A Plazak, Esq., at Reid &
Hellyer, APC, in Riverside, California.

The Bankruptcy Court on Aug. 31, 2015, granted Wrightwood Guest
Ranch's request for relief under Chapter 11 and vacated the
Involuntary Petition filed against the Debtor.

The case is assigned to Judge Scott C. Clarkson.

The Debtor tapped Walter & Wilhelm Law Group as bankruptcy counsel;
Hall & Company as accountants; and Baker, Manock & Jensen as
special counsel.

                          *     *     *

The Debtor filed a proposed Plan and Disclosure Statement on
Oct. 26, 2015.  On Dec. 4, 2014, it filed an amended Plan and
Disclosure Statement.  Under the Plan, the Debtor intends to pay
unsecured creditors 100 percent of their allowed claims, together
with interest at a rate of 1.5 percent.  Part of the creditor
payments will be made in semi-annual installments over the course
of the next 60 months; the remainder will be paid "with a balloon
payment due at the end of the sixtieth month following the
Effective Date."


WRWM PARTNERSHIP: Sale of Pennsylvania Property for $150K Okayed
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Eric L. Frank of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania authorized WRWM Partnership, LLC, to sell
its property located at 935 W. Cypress Avenue, Kennett Square,
Pennsylvania, to Steven A. Kopp for $149,500.

The property will be sold, transferred free and clear of all liens,
encumbrances and interests as follows:

   a. M&T Bank, the lienholder on the property, has consented to a
free and clear sale of the property and has agreed to release its
mortgage interest and lien in and/or against the property provided
all net proceeds are paid to M&T at closing on the sale of the
property.  Net proceeds are defined as gross sales proceeds less
real estate taxes, normal closing costs, a $2,500 carve-out for a
judgment lien on the property, and a $4,000 carve-out to the
Debtor's estate for the Debtor's legal fees associated with the
sale of the property.  The Debtor anticipates net proceeds not to
be less than $119,962, which will be paid to M&T at the time of
closing on the sale of the property from the sale proceeds.

   b. The Debtor's counsel, which is owed substantial legal fees,
has consented to reduce its fees to the amount of $4,000, to be
paid from proceeds of the sale at closing so that the sale of the
property can proceed free and clear pursuant to Section(f)(2) and
Section 363(b)(1) of the Code.

   c. The judgment holder holding a security interest on the
property, Landis & Setzler, P.C., has consented to reduce its
judgment to the amount of $2,500, to be paid from proceeds of the
sale at closing so that the sale of the property can proceed free
and clear pursuant to Section(f)(2) and Section 363(b)(1) of the
Code.

   d. The outstanding real estate taxes on the property will be
paid out of the proceeds of the sale at closing with such taxes for
tax year 2015 and years prior being paid to the Chester County Tax
Claim Bureau and with real estate taxes for tax year 2016 being
paid directly to the individual taxing authorities.  To the extent
that an error is made at the time of closing and any real estate
tax is not paid in full at the closing, any unpaid real estate tax
will be preserved and remain a valid first lien on the property
notwithstanding the sale of the property pursuant to the Order.

   e. All other liens, claims, or encumbrances which are real
estate municipal/county taxes and other municipal/county
fines/liens assessed against the property will be paid so that the
property may be sold free and clear pursuant to Section(f)(1) and
Section 363(b)(1) of the Code.  These total approximately $19,684.

The Debtor is authorized to distribute to M&T Bank the full
remainder of the purchase price at closing once the closing costs,
$2,500 judgment lien in favor of Landis & Setzler, P.C., taxes,
municipal bills and/or fines, and $4,000 carve out for Debtor's
counsel have been paid.

The 14 day stay provisions as set forth in F.R.B.P. 6004(h) are
waived.

                      About WRWM Partnership

WRWM Partnership, LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 16-11997) on March 24, 2016, estimating
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  

The Debtor has remained in possession of its assets and continued
management of its business as a debtor-in-possession pursuant to
Sections 1107 and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed.


YVONNE BLANCE ENEA: To Surrender Residence to Secured Creditor
--------------------------------------------------------------
Yvonne Blanche Enea filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California a combined plan of reorganization
and disclosure statement, which propose the surrender of the
Debtor's property located at 2493 Roundhill, in Alamo, California,
to its secured creditor, Primestar, to satisfy the secured
creditor's claim.

The Plan proposes that Fremon Bank, which holds a $500,000 claim
secured by the Roundhill Property, will be paid nothing.  Prior to
confirmation, the Debtor will obtain an order or stipulation fixing
the secured amount of Fremont Bank's claims at zero.  To the extent
the lien is determined to be unsecured, the Plan says it was
discharged in the Debtor's prior Chapter 7 case, No. 11-46922,
filed on June 28, 2011, discharge entered November 23, 2011.

The Debtor has no general unsecured creditors.

The Debtor had been negotiating a loan modification with Bank of
America which held the first deed of trust on her residence.  The
parties had reached an agreement to forgive most or all of the
arrearage claim and for modification of the mortgage payments, but
before the paperwork could be completed, Bank of America sold the
loan and the Debtor had to start over with the new lender.  While
this was progressing, the lender started foreclosure, and the
Chapter 11 case was filed to prevent the foreclosure sale on the
Debtor's home.

The Debtor's daughter and son-in-law have moved into the Debtors
home and are helping her since she has had a number of health
issues and is unable to work.  The Daughter and son-in-law will
provide the funds necessary to fund this plan for the next few
years, while the Debtor's health issues are stabilized and her
housing needs can best be assessed.  They will then sell or
refinance the house and pay off the current mortgage holder in
full.

A full-text copy of the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement
dated Sept. 6, 2016, is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/15-51297-109.pdf

Yvonne Blanche Enea filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Cal.
Case No. 16-40196) on January 26, 2016, and is represented by Ruth
Elin Auerbach, Esq.


ZIO'S RESTAURANT: Hires Auction Nation as Auctioneer
----------------------------------------------------
Zio's Restaurant Company, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates have hired
Auction Nation, LLC, to sell by auction all furniture, fixtures,
and equipment at any of the store locations to be closed by them,
free and clear of all liens, claims, and encumbrances.

On the Petition Date, the Debtors filed motions to reject leases
and close five of their restaurants:

       * Store No. 605, Independence MO
       * Store No. 607, Humble, TX
       * Store No. 608, Webster, TX
       * Store No. 613, Albuquerque, NM
       * Store No. 623, San Antonio, TX

The Debtors said they are evaluating the remaining 11 operating
locations for closure as well.

"Employment of the Auctioneer is necessary to assist the Debtors in
liquidating the FF&E for the benefit of these estates.  If the FF&E
is not sold and remains at the closed locations, rent may continue
to accrue and the FF&E will depreciate in value.  The Debtors
believe the Auctioneer is duly-qualified to, and will, facilitate
an expeditious, profitable sale of the FF&E for the benefit of
their estates," said David W. Parham, Esq., at Akerman LLP, one of
the Debtors' attorneys.

The lienholders whose valid claims are secured by valid liens on
the FF&E will have their liens transferred to the proceeds of those
sales in the order and priority as they existed on the Petition
Date.

In exchange for Auction Nation's services, the firm will be
compensated on a commission basis of 30% of gross hammer price,
less returns.  The Debtors' expenses will be deducted from their
net proceeds from each auction.  

For onsite auctions, Auction Nation will be compensated on a
commission equal to 30% of the final gross hammer collected price,
less any returns.  No removal or other expenses will be charged to
the Debtors.

For retrieval of FF&E situations, while in stores, the removal fee
for removal and transportation of assets to Auction Nation's
warehouse facility would cost the Debtors $2,500 per store.  If
multiple stores could be picked up in a radius of about 45 miles,
the price will go down significantly per store, providing they are
picked upon on the same day, in accordance with the Auction
Agreement.

The Debtors believe that the Auction Nation does not hold or
represent an interest adverse to these estates, and is
disinterested as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

                    Store Closure Procedures

The Debtors request the Court approve these store closing
procedures:

    a. Upon 72 hour notice to any affected landlord of the
       Debtors' decision to reject a lease, the Debtors may cease
       operations at the related location and liquidate any
       FF&E at the location.  The Debtors will contemporaneously
       move to reject the applicable lease, however, rejection of
       the lease will not be approved absent further order of the
       Court;

    b. The Debtors will file notice of their intent to close with
       the Court and serve notice on the affected landlord and
       master service list; and

    c. If any party-in-interest informs the Debtors that it
       opposes closing of any particular store location, then the
       Debtors will operate the store pending a hearing on either
       the store closure or rejection of that lease.

                     About Zio's Restaurant

Founded in 1994 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Zio's Restaurant
Company, LLC, et al., have operated a full-service chain restaurant
since 2007.  Zio's focuses on providing Italian cuisine in a casual
and comfortable open-aire piazza.  Zio's offers appetizers, soups
and salads, pastas, specialties, calzones and sandwiches, pizzas,
drinks, wine, desserts, kid's menu, pronto lunches, and gluten free
menu options.

As of the Petition Date, there were 15 stores, all of which operate
in leased premises located in Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas,
New Mexico and Colorado.  The Debtors employ 875 personnel.  At one
time, the Zios' concept was expanded to 21 locations.

The Debtors' business operations are, and have been, managed by FMP
SA Management Group, LLC pursuant to a management agreement.  FMP,
a privately held company based in Hollywood Park, Texas, is a
multi-concept developer and operator of independent restaurant
chains.

Zio's Restaurant is the sole member of each of Debtors FMPRG # 601,
LLC, FMPRG # 602, LLC, FMPRG # 603, LLC, FMPRG # 604, LLC, FMPRG #
605, LLC, FMPRG # 606, LLC, FMPRG # 607, LLC, FMPRG # 608, LLC,
FMPRG # 609, LLC, FMPRG # 610, LLC, FMPRG # 611, LLC, FMPRG # 613,
LLC, FMPRG # 615, LLC, FMPRG # 618, LLC, FMPRG # 623, LLC, and
FMPRG # 624, LLC.

Zio's Restaurant Company, LLC and 16 of its subsidiaries commenced
Chapter 11 cases on Sept. 7, 2016, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Texas (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Proposed Lead Case
No. 16-52041).  The cases are assigned to Judge Ronald B. King.


[*] Long-time Bankruptcy Judge Robert Martin Retiring
-----------------------------------------------------
The American Bankruptcy Institute, citing Ed Treleven of Wisconsin
State Journal, reported that U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Martin,
who has served for 38 years, most of them as chief judge of the
federal bankruptcy court in Madison, announced that he is retiring
at the end of the month.

According to the report, Judge Martin has been a bankruptcy judge
in the Western District of Wisconsin since 1978, and was its chief
judge until 2012.  The district currently has two bankruptcy
judges, the report said.

In addition, Judge Martin has served as a visiting judge in
bankruptcy courts in the northern districts of Illinois and Iowa,
the report related.

Judge Martin is a graduate of Cornell College in Iowa and in 1969,
graduated from the University of Chicago Law School, the report
further related.  He worked in private practice for Ross & Stevens
in Madison from 1970 to 1978 before his appointment to the bench,
the report said.

Judge Martin is the former president of the National Conference of
Bankruptcy Judges, a fellow of the American College of Bankruptcy
and former national director of the Turnaround Management
Association, the report further related.  He has co-authored
several books on bankruptcy law and taught bankruptcy-related
courses at the UW Law School, the report said.  He also frequently
lectures on bankruptcy and commercial law, the report added.


[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week From Sept. 5 to 9, 2016
------------------------------------------------------
   Company                  Ticker  Coupon Bid Price Maturity
   -------                  ------  ------ --------- --------
A. M. Castle & Co           CAS      7.000    58.375 12/15/2017
ACE Cash Express Inc        AACE    11.000    50.250   2/1/2019
ACE Cash Express Inc        AACE    11.000    50.500   2/1/2019
Affinion Investments LLC    AFFINI  13.500    47.875  8/15/2018
Alpha Appalachia
  Holdings Inc              ANR      3.250     0.200   8/1/2015
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc             ANR      7.500     0.938   8/1/2020
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc             ANR      4.875     0.500 12/15/2020
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc             ANR      7.500     0.938   8/1/2020
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc             ANR      7.500     6.000   8/1/2020
American Eagle
  Energy Corp               AMZG    11.000    13.438   9/1/2019
American Eagle
  Energy Corp               AMZG    11.000    13.375   9/1/2019
American Gilsonite Co       AMEGIL  11.500    71.500   9/1/2017
American Gilsonite Co       AMEGIL  11.500    70.750   9/1/2017
Amyris Inc                  AMRS     6.500    28.411  5/15/2019
Arch Coal Inc               ACI      7.000     4.000  6/15/2019
Arch Coal Inc               ACI      7.250     3.500  6/15/2021
Arch Coal Inc               ACI      7.250     3.100  10/1/2020
Arch Coal Inc               ACI      9.875     2.097  6/15/2019
Arch Coal Inc               ACI      8.000     2.750  1/15/2019
Arch Coal Inc               ACI      8.000     2.639  1/15/2019
Armstrong Energy Inc        ARMS    11.750    41.107 12/15/2019
Armstrong Energy Inc        ARMS    11.750    39.500 12/15/2019
Aurora Diagnostics
  Holdings LLC /
  Aurora Diagnostics
  Financing Inc             ARDX    10.750    68.000  1/15/2018
Avaya Inc                   AVYA    10.500    26.375   3/1/2021
Avaya Inc                   AVYA    10.500    32.640   3/1/2021
BPZ Resources Inc           BPZR     6.500     3.017   3/1/2015
BPZ Resources Inc           BPZR     6.500     3.017   3/1/2049
Bank of America Corp        BAC      7.800    99.892  9/15/2016
Bank of America Corp        BAC      5.400    99.100  9/15/2030
Basic Energy Services Inc   BAS      7.750    38.000  2/15/2019
Baxter International Inc    BAX      1.850   101.279  6/15/2018
Baxter International Inc    BAX      5.375   107.307   6/1/2018
Baxter International Inc    BAX      1.850   100.056  1/15/2017
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc          CZR     10.000    53.500 12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc          CZR     12.750    53.250  4/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc          CZR     10.000    53.250 12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc          CZR      5.750    40.000  10/1/2017
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc          CZR      5.750    12.250  10/1/2017
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc          CZR     10.000    52.750 12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc          CZR     10.000    54.375 12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc          CZR     10.000    52.750 12/15/2018
CalAtlantic Group Inc       CAA     10.750   100.125  9/15/2016
Chassix Holdings Inc        CHASSX  10.000     8.000 12/15/2018
Chassix Holdings Inc        CHASSX  10.000     8.000 12/15/2018
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE      8.875    19.550  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE      7.750    15.250   6/1/2020
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE     10.500    64.833   6/1/2017
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE      7.750    14.875   6/1/2020
Cliffs Natural
  Resources Inc             CLF      5.950   105.237  1/15/2018
Colonial Bank/
  Montgomery AL             CNB      9.375     1.015   6/1/2011
Community Choice
  Financial Inc             CCFI    10.750    47.851   5/1/2019
Creditcorp                  CRECOR  12.000    40.450  7/15/2018
Creditcorp                  CRECOR  12.000    40.000  7/15/2018
Cumulus Media Holdings Inc  CMLS     7.750    40.795   5/1/2019
DynCorp International Inc   DCP     10.375    82.897   7/1/2017
EPL Oil & Gas Inc           EXXI     8.250    16.200  2/15/2018
EXCO Resources Inc          XCO      7.500    50.973  9/15/2018
Eagle Rock Energy
  Partners LP / Eagle
  Rock Energy
  Finance Corp              EROC     8.375    50.126   6/1/2019
Endeavour
  International Corp        END     12.000     1.017   3/1/2018
Endeavour
  International Corp        END     12.000     0.006   6/1/2018
Endeavour
  International Corp        END     12.000     1.017   3/1/2018
Energy & Exploration
  Partners Inc              ENEXPR   8.000     1.970   7/1/2019
Energy & Exploration
  Partners Inc              ENEXPR   8.000     1.970   7/1/2019
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc               ENER     3.000     7.875  6/15/2013
Energy Future
  Holdings Corp             TXU      9.750    29.000 10/15/2019
Energy Future
  Holdings Corp             TXU     11.250    96.500  11/1/2017
Energy Future
  Holdings Corp             TXU     10.875    96.500  11/1/2017
Energy Future
  Holdings Corp             TXU     10.875    60.125  11/1/2017
Energy Future Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc          TXU     10.000     3.443  12/1/2020
Energy Future Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc          TXU     10.000     3.750  12/1/2020
Energy Future Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc          TXU      9.750    29.000 10/15/2019
Energy XXI Gulf Coast Inc   EXXI    11.000    41.750  3/15/2020
Energy XXI Gulf Coast Inc   EXXI     9.250    11.000 12/15/2017
Energy XXI Gulf Coast Inc   EXXI     7.500    10.125 12/15/2021
Energy XXI Gulf Coast Inc   EXXI     7.750    10.500  6/15/2019
Energy XXI Gulf Coast Inc   EXXI     6.875    10.750  3/15/2024
Entergy Arkansas Inc        ETR      5.900    99.900   6/1/2033
FBOP Corp                   FBOPCP  10.000     1.843  1/15/2009
FXCM Inc                    FXCM     2.250    39.500  6/15/2018
FairPoint Communications
  Inc/Old                   FRP     13.125     1.879   4/2/2018
Federal Farm Credit Banks   FFCB     0.850   100.000  9/18/2017
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc   FLTW    14.000     3.557 12/15/2011
Forbes Energy Services Ltd  FES      9.000    20.650  6/15/2019
Goldman Sachs
  Group Inc/The             GS       2.647    99.990  9/20/2016
Goodman Networks Inc        GOODNT  12.125    44.000   7/1/2018
Goodrich Petroleum Corp     GDPM     8.875    14.500  3/15/2018
Goodrich Petroleum Corp     GDPM     8.875     0.900  3/15/2019
Goodrich Petroleum Corp     GDPM     8.875    14.375  3/15/2018
Goodrich Petroleum Corp     GDPM     8.875     0.900  3/15/2019
HCP Inc                     HCP      6.300   100.087  9/15/2016
Horsehead Holding Corp      ZINC    10.500    82.500   6/1/2017
Horsehead Holding Corp      ZINC     9.000    19.875   6/1/2017
Horsehead Holding Corp      ZINC    10.500    81.125   6/1/2017
Horsehead Holding Corp      ZINC    10.500    81.125   6/1/2017
Illinois Power
  Generating Co             DYN      7.000    38.045  4/15/2018
Illinois Power
  Generating Co             DYN      6.300    40.000   4/1/2020
Iracore International
  Holdings Inc              IRACOR   9.500    57.750   6/1/2018
Iracore International
  Holdings Inc              IRACOR   9.500    57.750   6/1/2018
IronGate Energy
  Services LLC              IRONGT  11.000    22.500   7/1/2018
IronGate Energy
  Services LLC              IRONGT  11.000    22.750   7/1/2018
IronGate Energy
  Services LLC              IRONGT  11.000    23.375   7/1/2018
IronGate Energy
  Services LLC              IRONGT  11.000    23.375   7/1/2018
JPMorgan Chase & Co         JPM      1.644   100.050  9/21/2016
Kellwood Co                 KWD      7.625    80.590 10/15/2017
Key Energy Services Inc     KEGX     6.750    26.000   3/1/2021
Las Vegas Monorail Co       LASVMC   5.500     5.000  7/15/2019
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH      2.000     3.834   3/3/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH      5.000     3.834   2/7/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH      1.600     3.834  11/5/2011
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH      4.000     3.834  4/30/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH      1.500     3.834  3/29/2013
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH      2.070     3.834  6/15/2009
Lehman Brothers Inc         LEH      7.500     1.226   8/1/2026
Liberty Interactive LLC     LINTA    1.000    86.500  9/30/2043
Light Tower Rentals Inc     LHTTWR   8.125    42.500   8/1/2019
Linc USA GP / Linc Energy
  Finance USA Inc           LNCAU    9.625    21.375 10/31/2017
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE     8.625    22.250  4/15/2020
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE     6.500    22.024  5/15/2019
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE    12.000    44.000 12/15/2020
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE     7.750    22.012   2/1/2021
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE     6.250    22.250  11/1/2019
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE     6.500    22.250  9/15/2021
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE     6.250    84.000  11/1/2019
Linn Energy LLC / Linn
  Energy Finance Corp       LINE     6.250    22.000  11/1/2019
Logan's Roadhouse Inc       LGNS    10.750     7.855 10/15/2017
Lumbermens Mutual
  Casualty Co               KEMPER   9.150     0.001   7/1/2026
Lumbermens Mutual
  Casualty Co               KEMPER   8.300     0.001  12/1/2037
Lumbermens Mutual
  Casualty Co               KEMPER   8.450     0.446  12/1/2097
MF Global Holdings Ltd      MF       3.375    21.000   8/1/2018
MF Global Holdings Ltd      MF       9.000    21.125  6/20/2038
MModal Inc                  MODL    10.750    10.125  8/15/2020
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC          MPO     10.750     4.500  10/1/2020
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC          MPO      9.250     4.500   6/1/2021
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC          MPO     12.000    11.250   6/1/2020
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC          MPO     10.750     4.092  10/1/2020
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC          MPO     10.750     4.092  10/1/2020
Modular Space Corp          MODSPA  10.250    41.430  1/31/2019
Modular Space Corp          MODSPA  10.250    41.500  1/31/2019
National CineMedia LLC      NATCIN   7.875   103.302  7/15/2021
Nine West Holdings Inc      JNY      8.250    17.000  3/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc      JNY      6.875    17.310  3/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc      JNY      6.125    15.800 11/15/2034
Nine West Holdings Inc      JNY      8.250    18.500  3/15/2019
Nuverra Environmental
  Solutions Inc             NESC     9.875    12.500  4/15/2018
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC        OMX      5.540    12.175  1/29/2020
Optima Specialty Steel Inc  OPTSTL  12.500    88.500 12/15/2016
Optima Specialty Steel Inc  OPTSTL  12.500    88.875 12/15/2016
Orexigen Therapeutics Inc   OREX     2.750    27.688  12/1/2020
Peabody Energy Corp         BTU      6.000    24.250 11/15/2018
Peabody Energy Corp         BTU      6.250    24.250 11/15/2021
Peabody Energy Corp         BTU      6.500    24.250  9/15/2020
Peabody Energy Corp         BTU      4.750     2.250 12/15/2041
Peabody Energy Corp         BTU      6.000    17.250 11/15/2018
Peabody Energy Corp         BTU      6.250    23.750 11/15/2021
Peabody Energy Corp         BTU      6.250    23.750 11/15/2021
Peabody Energy Corp         BTU      6.000    13.125 11/15/2018
Penn Virginia Corp          PVAH     7.250    15.165  4/15/2019
Penn Virginia Corp          PVAH     8.500    41.250   5/1/2020
Permian Holdings Inc        PRMIAN  10.500    30.000  1/15/2018
Permian Holdings Inc        PRMIAN  10.500    29.750  1/15/2018
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc              PTX      4.250    21.950   4/1/2021
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc              PTX      4.250    21.950   4/1/2021
PetroQuest Energy Inc       PQ      10.000    70.250   9/1/2017
Prospect Holding
  Co LLC / Prospect
  Holding Finance Co        PRSPCT  10.250    42.500  10/1/2018
Prospect Holding
  Co LLC / Prospect
  Holding Finance Co        PRSPCT  10.250    42.000  10/1/2018
Quicksilver Resources Inc   KWKA     9.125     1.500  8/15/2019
Quicksilver Resources Inc   KWKA    11.000     2.810   7/1/2021
RAAM Global Energy Co       RAMGEN  12.500     1.950  10/1/2015
Rex Energy Corp             REXX     8.875    40.026  12/1/2020
Rolta LLC                   RLTAIN  10.750    17.500  5/16/2018
SAExploration Holdings Inc  SAEX    10.000    63.000  7/15/2019
SBA Telecommunications Inc  SBAC     5.750   102.575  7/15/2020
Samson Investment Co        SAIVST   9.750     4.125  2/15/2020
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD       8.750    38.000   6/1/2020
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD       7.500     6.625  2/15/2023
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD       7.500     6.750  3/15/2021
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD       8.750     6.750  1/15/2020
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD       8.125     6.625 10/15/2022
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD       8.750    41.000   6/1/2020
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD       8.125     6.500 10/16/2022
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD       7.500     6.500  2/16/2023
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD       7.500     6.250  3/15/2021
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD       7.500     6.250  3/15/2021
Sequa Corp                  SQA      7.000    15.000 12/15/2017
Sequa Corp                  SQA      7.000    14.000 12/15/2017
Sidewinder Drilling Inc     SIDDRI   9.750     7.000 11/15/2019
Sidewinder Drilling Inc     SIDDRI   9.750     6.750 11/15/2019
Speedy Group Holdings Corp  SPEEDY  12.000    39.500 11/15/2017
Speedy Group Holdings Corp  SPEEDY  12.000    39.500 11/15/2017
Springleaf Finance Corp     AMGFIN   5.750   100.125  9/15/2016
SquareTwo Financial Corp    SQRTW   11.625    15.400   4/1/2017
Stone Energy Corp           SGY      1.750    53.000   3/1/2017
SunEdison Inc               SUNE     5.000    55.750   7/2/2018
SunEdison Inc               SUNE     3.375     6.575   6/1/2025
SunEdison Inc               SUNE     0.250     6.563  1/15/2020
SunEdison Inc               SUNE     2.000     6.500  10/1/2018
SunEdison Inc               SUNE     2.750     7.875   1/1/2021
SunEdison Inc               SUNE     2.625     6.625   6/1/2023
SunEdison Inc               SUNE     2.375     7.600  4/15/2022
TMST Inc                    THMR     8.000     7.900  5/15/2013
Talos Production LLC /
  Talos Production
  Finance Inc               TALPRO   9.750    45.950  2/15/2018
Talos Production LLC /
  Talos Production
  Finance Inc               TALPRO   9.750    46.250  2/15/2018
TerraVia Holdings Inc       TVIA     6.000    61.375   2/1/2018
Terrestar Networks Inc      TSTR     6.500    10.000  6/15/2014
TetraLogic
  Pharmaceuticals Corp      TLOG     8.000    26.015  6/15/2019
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc               TXU     11.500    31.125  10/1/2020
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc               TXU     10.250     6.550  11/1/2015
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc               TXU     15.000     6.760   4/1/2021
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc               TXU     10.250     6.700  11/1/2015
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc               TXU     11.500    30.750  10/1/2020
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc               TXU     15.000     6.700   4/1/2021
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc               TXU     10.250     6.750  11/1/2015
Toys R Us Inc               TOY     10.375   101.125  8/15/2017
Triangle USA
  Petroleum Corp            TPLM     6.750    22.900  7/15/2022
Triangle USA
  Petroleum Corp            TPLM     6.750    21.500  7/15/2022
UCI International LLC       UCII     8.625    22.625  2/15/2019
Venoco Inc                  VQ       8.875     1.000  2/15/2019
Verso Paper Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc           VRS     11.750    17.000  1/15/2019
Verso Paper Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc           VRS     11.750    17.000  1/15/2019
W&T Offshore Inc            WTI      8.500    30.960  6/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG     9.500    20.500 10/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG     9.500    20.500 10/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG     9.500    20.500 10/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG     9.500    20.500 10/15/2019
Warren Resources Inc        WRES     9.000     1.147   8/1/2022
Warren Resources Inc        WRES     9.000     1.147   8/1/2022
Warren Resources Inc        WRES     9.000     1.147   8/1/2022
iHeartCommunications Inc    IHRT    10.000    63.000  1/15/2018


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2016.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***