TCR_Public/160714.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Thursday, July 14, 2016, Vol. 20, No. 196

                            Headlines

7711 OPERATING COMPANY: Bid for Chapter 11 Trustee Approved
ALPHA NATURAL: Court Indicates Plan Confirmation
ALPHA NATURAL: Enters Into Agreement With West Virginia DEP
AMERICAN POWER: Appoints Jim Harger as New Board Member
ANACOR PHARMACEUTICALS: Baker Bros. No Longer a Shareholder

ANACOR PHARMACEUTICALS: FMR LLC No Longer Owns Common Shares
ARCH COAL: Disclosure Statement Approved, Sept. 13 Conf. Hrg Set
ATP OIL: BP Settlement Hearing Set for Aug. 15
BBB INDUSTRIES: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR, Outlook Remains Stable
BILTMORE INVESTMENTS: Bid to Junk Atty's Appeal Granted

BROOKLYN EVENTS: Bid Offers for Nightclub Due July 13
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Amends Proposed Merger Agreement with CAC
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Hamlet Reports 60.1% Stake as of July 9
CHAPARRAL ENERGY: Claims Bar Date Set for Aug. 19, 2016
CLAIRE'S STORES: Sees $25M-$29M Operation Income for Q2 2016

CLOUD CRANE: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
COMBIMATRIX CORP: Signs Repurchase Agreement with Stockholders
COMDISCO HOLDING: Court Approves Closure of Chapter 11 Case
CONSTELLATION ENTERPRISES: Asks Court to Set Claims Bar Date
DPL INC: Fitch Affirms 'B+' Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings

ENERGY DRILLING: Pacific Energy Asks for Independent Trustee
ENERGY FUTURE: Court Approves Modified TCEH DIP Order
ESML HOLDING: Meeting to Form Creditors' Panel Set for July 19
FILMED ENTERTAINMENT: Can Access Cash Until Plan Effective Date
FRAC SPECIALISTS: Unsec. Creditors' Bid for Trustee Okayed

GENERAL MOTORS: Lenders' Suit vs Mayer Brown Dismissed
GENERAL PRODUCTS: U.S. Trustee Forms 5-Member Committee
HAMPSHIRE GROUP: To Transition Dockers Licenses Back to Levi
HAROLD ROSBOTTOM: Summary Judgment for Schiff, Fox Reversed
HECK INDUSTRIES: Southern Aggregates  Replaces Savard in Panel

HOLLY ENERGY: S&P Assigns 'BB' Rating on Proposed $300MM Notes
HUB INTERNATIONAL: S&P Raises Rating on Sr. Facilities to 'B+'
IAN RAJIV SAHAI: Chichester Proposes Trustee or Conversion
INTERVENTION ENERGY: Hires DLA Piper as Counsel
INTERVENTION ENERGY: Hires PJT Partners as Investment Banker

INTERVENTION ENERGY: Taps Rust Omni as Administrative Agent
JESUS CARES PRESCHOOL: Seeks Court Okay to Hire A+ Accounting
JHB ENTERPRISES: Hires Mateer & Harbert as Counsel
KALOBIOS PHARMACEUTICALS: Black Horse Files Schedule 13D with SEC
MARCLAY EMS: Seeks to Hire Marc Valentine on Tax Matters

MARICOPA RESOURCES: Case Converted to Chapter 11; Trustee Named
MCNEILL GROUP: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
METCOM NETWORK: Hires Ackerman Fox as Counsel
ML AUTO CENTER: Hires Halabu as Bankruptcy Counsel
MONTREIGN OPERATING: S&P Discontinues 'B-' Rating on Sr. Sec. Loan

NEONODE INC: FMR LLC No Longer a Shareholder
NEW ENTERPRISE: Incurs $10.1 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
OAK RIVER ASSET: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
PACIFIC SUNWEAR: Hires Deloitte as Tax Service Provider
PARADIGM HIGH SCHOOL: S&P Raises School Revenue Bonds Rating to BB

PAYSON OPERATING: Case Converted to Chapter 11, Trustee Named
PAYSON PETROLEUM: Case Converted to Chapter 11; Trustee Named
PELICAN REAL ESTATE: Hires Baker & Hostetler as Counsel
PHOTO STENCIL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PLANTATION SWEETS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

PRINTPACK HOLDINGS: S&P Rates Proposed $250MM Sr. Loan 'BB'
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES: Milbank Tweed Represents 2nd Lienholders
RICEBRAN TECHNOLOGIES: Announces Final Annual Meeting Results
RICEBRAN TECHNOLOGIES: Inks Settlement Agreement with LF-RB Mgmt.
SCHWAB INDUSTRIES: Court Dismisses Untimely Appeal

SEABOARD REALTY: Court OK's Bid for Default Judgment vs. DiMenna
STAGE PRESENCE: Court Permits Reopening of Prior Judgment
STERLING INTERMEDIATE: S&P Assigns 'B' CCR, Outlook Stable
STONE ENERGY: State Street Reports 0.44% Stake as of June 30
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL: Trustee Sought by NJ Amid Indictment

SUNEDISON INC: Seeks Approval of Retention Plan for Key Employees
SUTTON 58 OWNER NY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SWIFT ENERGY: Morris Propp's Bid for Stay Pending Appeal Denied
SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS: Meeting to Form Creditors' Panel Set for July 14
TENNESSEE SEAFOOD: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

TEXAS COMPETITIVE: S&P Rates $4.25BB DIP Credit Facility 'BB-'
TOTAL HOCKEY: Seeks Court Approval of Cash Collateral Use
TRIAD GUARANTY: Summary Judgment in Suit vs. Insurance Co. Affirmed
TRINITY RIVER RESOURCES: Lenders Want Telfer Replaced by Trustee
UPRIGHT SHORING: Hires Fischer Auction to Sell Equipment

UWAGBOE O. ORU-LAWRENCE: UST Wants Ch. 11 Trustee Named
VIDALIA PLANTATION: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
VILLAGE CONCEPTS: Katz's 3rd-Party Complaint Dismissed, Case Closed
VISION ADVENTURES: Court Vacates Griffin, Davis Default Judgment
WATERFORD FUNDING: Default Judgment vs Stone Vacated

WHITEWAVE FOODS: Moody's Puts Ba2 CFR on Review for Upgrade
WIRECO WORLDGROUP: S&P Raises CCR to 'B', Outlook Stable
YP HOLDINGS: S&P Cuts CCR to 'CCC+' on Weakening Credit Metrics
[*] Moody's: LSI Eases to 8.7% in June, Signals Rising Defaults
[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings


                            *********

7711 OPERATING COMPANY: Bid for Chapter 11 Trustee Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mark X. Mullin entered an order directing the U.S. Trustee to
appoint a Chapter 11 trustee in 7711 Operating Company, LLC's case.
The motion was filed by the Debtor itself.  No objections were
filed to the motion.  The Order is without prejudice to any party
in interest filing a motion to dismiss the bankruptcy case for
"cause" or any other grounds other than those specifically ruled
upon by the Court.

7711 Operating Company, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
N.D. Tex. Case No. 16-41274) on March 31, 2016.  The Debtor is
represented by Eric A. Liepins, Esq., at Eric A. Liepins, PC.  The
Debtor estimated less than $50,000 in assets and $100,000 to
$500,000 in debt.


ALPHA NATURAL: Court Indicates Plan Confirmation
------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that in a corporate release, Alpha
Natural Resources announced that, contingent upon the finalization
of certain definitive documentation and the entry of a formal U.S.
Bankruptcy Court confirmation order, the Court has indicated that
it will confirm the Company's Second Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization. Alpha Natural Resources' chairman and C.E.O., Kevin
Crutchfield, comments, "We appreciate the commitment of our
workforce, the trust of our customers, and the ultimate support of
our creditors and broader stakeholders in helping to pave the way
for Alpha's successful emergence as a more streamlined, financially
secure company with attractive prospects for the future." Upon
emergence from Chapter 11 protection, Alpha Natural Resources is
expected to operate as a privately held company. The Company also
noted Court approval of its sale of certain core coal assets to
Contura Energy, a new company formed by a group of Alpha Natural
Resources' first lien lenders. The sale, which is scheduled to
close concurrently with the Company's emergence from Chapter 11
protection, includes the Company's two Powder River Basin mine
complexes in Wyoming, the Nicholas, McClure and Toms Creek mine
complexes in West Virginia and Virginia, all of the Company's
Pennsylvania coal operations and certain reserves, the Company's
interest in the Dominion Terminal Associates coal export terminal
in Newport News, Virginia and certain other assets, including
working capital. Alpha Natural Resources notes, "In addition to
operating as an independent, competitive entity in the U.S. and
international coal markets, Contura Energy will provide specified
contingent credit support for reorganized Alpha in the aggregate
amount of $35 million, from the effective date of emergence through
September 2018, subject to the terms and conditions of the Global
Settlement Term Sheet filed with the Court. Over the course of the
next ten years, Contura has agreed to also make contributions of up
to $100 million into certain restricted cash accounts to help fund
the ongoing reclamation activities of reorganized Alpha, in
addition to other support to be provided."

                About Alpha Natural Resources

Headquartered in Bristol, Virginia, Alpha Natural --
http://www.alphanr.com-- is a coal supplier, ranked second largest
among publicly traded U.S. coal producers as measured by 2014
consolidated revenues of $4.3 billion.  As of August 2015, Alpha
had 8,000 full time employees across many different states, with
UMWA representing 1,000 of the employees.

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 15-33896)
and its affiliates filed separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions
on Aug. 3, 2015, listing $9.9 billion in total assets as of June
30, 2015, and $7.3 billion in total liabilities as of June 30,
2015.

The petitions were signed by Richard H. Verheij, executive vice
president, general counsel and corporate secretary.

Judge Kevin R. Huennekens presides over the cases.

David G. Heiman, Esq., Carl E. Black, Esq., and Thomas A. Wilson,
Esq., at Jones Day serve as the Debtors' general counsel.  Tyler
P. Brown, Esq., J.R. Smith, Esq., Henry P. (Toby) Long, III, Esq.,
and Justin F. Paget, Esq., serve as the Debtors' local counsel.
Rothschild Group is the Debtors' financial advisor.  Alvarez &
Marshal Holdings, LLC, is the Debtors' investment banker.  Kurtzman
Carson Consultants, LLC, is the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.


The U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed seven creditors of Alpha
Natural Resources Inc. to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors. Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan R. Fleck, Esq.,
and Eric K. Stodola, Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP;
and William A. Gray, Esq., W. Ashley Burgess, Esq., and Roy M.
Terry, Jr., Esq. at Sands Anderson PC, represent the Committee.

                            *     *     *

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. on March 8, 2016, disclosed that it
has filed a proposed Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization and a
related Disclosure Statement with the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.  Together with the
motion seeking approval of a marketing process for Alpha's core
operating assets, these filings provide for the sale of Alpha's
assets, detail a path toward the resolution of all creditor
claims, and anticipate the emergence of a streamlined and
sustainable reorganized company able to satisfy its environmental
obligations on an ongoing basis.

By selling certain assets as a going concern and restructuring the
company's remaining assets into a reorganized Alpha, the company is
able to provide maximum recovery to its creditors, while preserving
jobs and putting itself in the best position to meet its
reclamation obligations.


ALPHA NATURAL: Enters Into Agreement With West Virginia DEP
-----------------------------------------------------------
The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection has
entered into definitive documentation of its previously announced
agreement in principle with the state's largest coal operator,
Alpha Natural Resources, which filed for bankruptcy in August
2015.

Alpha filed the DEP agreement on July 12, along with similar
agreements with the other States in which Alpha will continue to
operate, as well as several agencies of the United States, with the
court overseeing Alpha's bankruptcy case.  The bankruptcy court
also entered an order approving the agreements and confirming
Alpha's bankruptcy plan.  A closing is expected to occur later this
month.

As previously announced, DEP's agreement with Alpha, now with an
undiscounted value of more than $325 million to the State of West
Virginia, will pave the way for the bonding and reclaiming of all
of Alpha's legacy liability sites in West Virginia, as well as its
continuing operations in West Virginia.

Under the agreement, the surety bonds Alpha previously posted to
obtain its mining permits will remain fully in place.  But Alpha,
West Virginia's last remaining self-bonded coal company, will post
an additional $100 million in surety and other forms of bonds to
replace all of the self-bonds at its active and inactive mining
sites in West Virginia.  Alpha will also immediately post $39
million in letters of credit or cash bonds as financial assurance
for the performance of Alpha's reclamation and water treatment
obligations at its other remaining self-bonded sites in West
Virginia.

Alpha has committed, moreover, to post bonds for, and reclaim and
treat water at, all its remaining mining sites, including sites in
other States and sites at which it has ceased mining operations,
over time.  To that end, Alpha and its secured creditors have
committed to provide at least an additional $229 million in secured
funding.  Of that amount, Alpha has committed to provide at least
$124 million of funding for reclamation and water treatment over
ten years, with a further commitment to provide half of its excess
operating cash flow over and above that amount for reclamation and
water treatment at its legacy sites.  The purchaser of Alpha's
Wyoming and other operations, an entity formed by Alpha's secured
creditors, has agreed to provide the remainder of the funding -- an
additional $55 million in reclamation and water treatment funding
over the next five years, as well as a guaranty Alpha's excess
operating cash flow commitment, up to an additional $50 million.
West Virginia's share of the $229 million in funds committed to
reclamation and water treatment will exceed eighty percent for at
least the first two years.

Kevin W. Barrett, a Bailey & Glasser partner and Special Assistant
Attorney General for the State in connection with the Alpha and
other coal company bankruptcy cases, called the agreement
"ground-breaking."  He added, "Not only does the agreement secure
the commitment of Alpha and its secured creditors to fully bond and
reclaim all of Alpha's mining sites in West Virginia, it marks the
first time that a large coal company has committed to remain in
business and continue to operate for the primary purpose of
reclaiming its legacy mining sites.

Founded by Ben Bailey and Brian Glasser in 1999 in Charleston, West
Virginia, Bailey & Glasser LLP has grown to include 52 lawyers,
with offices in nine states and the District of Columbia.  The
firm's complex litigation practice focuses on high-stakes
commercial litigation; class actions for consumers, insureds,
investors, and retirement plan participants; catastrophic injury
and defective product cases; antitrust; and whistleblower lawsuits.
The firm has extensive experience in energy law, and litigates
energy cases in trial courts, bankruptcy courts, regulatory
agencies, and appellate courts. It has a major corporate practice,
and handles business matters ranging from assisting Chinese
investors in acquiring US assets, to IPOs, to the negotiation and
execution of billions of dollars in commercial transactions.

                 About Alpha Natural Resources

Headquartered in Bristol, Virginia, Alpha Natural --
http://www.alphanr.com-- is a coal supplier, ranked second largest
among publicly traded U.S. coal producers as measured by 2014
consolidated revenues of $4.3 billion.  As of August 2015, Alpha
had 8,000 full time employees across many different states, with
UMWA representing 1,000 of the employees.

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 15-33896)
and its affiliates filed separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions
on Aug. 3, 2015, listing $9.9 billion in total assets as of June
30, 2015, and $7.3 billion in total liabilities as of June 30,
2015.

The petitions were signed by Richard H. Verheij, executive vice
president, general counsel and corporate secretary.

Judge Kevin R. Huennekens presides over the cases.

David G. Heiman, Esq., Carl E. Black, Esq., and Thomas A. Wilson,
Esq., at Jones Day serve as the Debtors' general counsel.  Tyler P.
Brown, Esq., J.R. Smith, Esq., Henry P. (Toby) Long, III, Esq.,
and Justin F. Paget, Esq., serve as the Debtors' local counsel.
Rothschild Group is the Debtors' financial advisor.  Alvarez &
Marshal Holdings, LLC, is the Debtors' investment banker.  Kurtzman
Carson Consultants, LLC, is the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.


The U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed seven creditors of Alpha
Natural Resources Inc. to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors. Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan R. Fleck, Esq.,
and Eric K. Stodola, Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP;

and William A. Gray, Esq., W. Ashley Burgess, Esq., and Roy M.
Terry, Jr., Esq. at Sands Anderson PC, represent the Committee.

                            *     *     *

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. on March 8, 2016, disclosed that it
has filed a proposed Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization and a
related Disclosure Statement with the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.  Together with the
motion seeking approval of a marketing process for Alpha's core
operating assets, these filings provide for the sale of Alpha's
assets, detail a path toward the resolution of all creditor claims,
and anticipate the emergence of a streamlined and sustainable
reorganized company able to satisfy its environmental obligations
on an ongoing basis.

By selling certain assets as a going concern and restructuring the
company's remaining assets into a reorganized Alpha, the company is
able to provide maximum recovery to its creditors, while
preserving jobs and putting itself in the best position to meet its
reclamation obligations.  This path will allow for a conclusion of
Alpha's bankruptcy proceedings by June 30, 2016.


AMERICAN POWER: Appoints Jim Harger as New Board Member
-------------------------------------------------------
American Power Group Corporation announced that James Harger has
joined the Company's Board of Directors effective July 11, 2016.
Mr. Harger replaces Jamie Weston as one of Arrow, LLC's, two Board
designees.

Mr. Harger, 58, is currently senior advisor to the CEO of Clean
Energy and served as chief marketing officer of Clean Energy from
2009 to 2014.  He was the second employee of Pickens Fuel Corp.
(the predecessor to Clean Energy) when he joined the company in
1997; managed and developed the company's airport, solid waste,
transit and truck markets; and later assisted in Clean Energy's
successful IPO which raised $120 million in 2007.  In his current
role, Mr. Harger is responsible for collaborating with shippers,
for-hire carriers and private fleets in their transition to
adopting natural gas trucks in their supply chains and operations.
Some of his most notable customers include Anheuser-Busch, Dillon
Transportation, Lowes, MillerCoors, Owens Corning, Procter &
Gamble, Raven Transportation, Ruan Transportation, Saddle Creek and
UPS.  He has been involved in the natural gas business for over 30
years, the majority of which has been dedicated to marketing
Natural Gas Vehicles and building fueling stations.  Jim earned a
BS in Civil Engineering from UCLA and an MBA from Pepperdine
University.

Mr. Harger stated, "I am excited to join the APG Board and growing
the company's market share in the heavy-duty truck market.  APG's
dual fuel product is a much needed offering for high horsepower
applications given their needs cannot be met by other natural gas
engines certified by either the California Air Resources Board
(CARB) or Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)."

Maury Needham, American Power Group's Chairman of the Board of
Directors, stated, "We are extremely pleased that Jim has agreed to
join our Board of Directors.  As one of the recognized leaders in
the natural gas industry, Jim brings a wealth of knowledge, great
energy and a significant proven rolodex of key business contacts
within our primary target market of heavy-duty Class 8 fleets."
Mr. Needham added, "We believe we have the best dual fuel
conversion technology at the lowest total cost of ownership
available in the market today and our significant emission
reduction achievements, especially in the area of NOx reduction
continue to attract state and local regulatory attention.  The
addition of Jim to our Board will allow us to reach a much larger
and broader audience of heavy-duty truck fleet operators who have
already embraced the significant environmental and economic
benefits of using natural gas as a transportation fuel."

Subject to the approval of the Board of Directors, the Company has
agreed to grant Mr. Harger an option under the Company's 2016 Stock
Option Plan to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's common
stock.  The exercise price per share of the option will be equal to
the closing price of the common stock on the date of grant.  The
option will vest over a period of 18 months from the date of grant
and will remain exercisable for a period of five years.  The
Company has also agreed, subject to the approval of the Board of
Directors, to grant Mr. Harger options to purchase up to 1,250,000
additional shares of common stock over a period of two years upon
the achievement of certain milestones.

                  About American Power Group

American Power Group's alternative energy subsidiary, American
Power Group, Inc., provides a cost-effective patented Turbocharged
Natural Gas conversion technology for vehicular, stationary and
off-road mobile diesel engines.  American Power Group's dual fuel
technology is a unique non-invasive energy enhancement system that
converts existing diesel engines into more efficient and
environmentally friendly engines that have the flexibility to run
on: (1) diesel fuel and liquefied natural gas; (2) diesel fuel and
compressed natural gas; (3) diesel fuel and pipeline or well-head
gas; and (4) diesel fuel and bio-methane, with the flexibility to
return to 100 percent diesel fuel operation at any time.  The
proprietary technology seamlessly displaces up to 80% of the
normal diesel fuel consumption with the average displacement
ranging from 40 percent to 65 percent.  The energized fuel balance
is maintained with a proprietary read-only electronic controller
system ensuring the engines operate at original equipment
manufacturers' specified temperatures and pressures.  Installation
on a wide variety of engine models and end-market applications
require no engine modifications unlike the more expensive invasive
fuel-injected systems in the market.  Additional information at
http://www.americanpowergroupinc.com/            

For the 12 months ended Sept. 30, 2015, the Company reported a net
loss available to common shareholders of $1.04 million on $2.95
million of net sales compared to a net loss available to common
shareholders of $920,000 on $6.28 million of net sales for the 12
months ended Sept. 30, 2014.

As of March 31, 2016, American Power had $10.77 million in total
assets, $9.04 million in total liabilities and $1.73 million in
total stockholders' equity.


ANACOR PHARMACEUTICALS: Baker Bros. No Longer a Shareholder
-----------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Baker Bros. Advisors LP, Baker Bros. Advisors (GP) LLC,
Felix J. Baker and Julian C. Baker disclosed that as of June 30,
2016, they have ceased to beneficially own shares of common stock
of Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  A copy of the regulatory filing is
available for free at https://is.gd/pUyo2M

                    About Anacor Pharmaceuticals

Palo Alto, Calif.-based Anacor Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: ANAC) is a
biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing and
commercializing novel small-molecule therapeutics derived from its
boron chemistry platform.  Anacor has discovered eight compounds
that are currently in development.  Its two lead product
candidates are topically administered dermatologic compounds -
tavaborole, an antifungal for the treatment of onychomycosis, and
AN2728, an anti-inflammatory PDE-4 inhibitor for the treatment of
atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.

Anacor reported a net loss of $61.2 million on $82.4 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net
loss of $87.1 million on $20.7 million of total revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of March 31, 2016, Anacor had $164 million in total assets, $119
million in total liabilities, $49,000 in redeemable common stock
and $44.6 million in total stockholders' equity.


ANACOR PHARMACEUTICALS: FMR LLC No Longer Owns Common Shares
------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 8, 2016, FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson
disclosed that they have ceased to beneficially own shares of
common stock of Anacor Pharmaceuticals Inc.  A copy of the
regulatory filing is available for free at https://is.gd/K0GgPa

                  About Anacor Pharmaceuticals

Palo Alto, Calif.-based Anacor Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: ANAC) is a
biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing and
commercializing novel small-molecule therapeutics derived from its
boron chemistry platform.  Anacor has discovered eight compounds
that are currently in development.  Its two lead product
candidates are topically administered dermatologic compounds -
tavaborole, an antifungal for the treatment of onychomycosis, and
AN2728, an anti-inflammatory PDE-4 inhibitor for the treatment of
atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.

Anacor reported a net loss of $61.2 million on $82.4 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net
loss of $87.1 million on $20.7 million of total revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of March 31, 2016, Anacor had $164 million in total assets, $119
million in total liabilities, $49,000 in redeemable common stock
and $44.6 million in total stockholders' equity.


ARCH COAL: Disclosure Statement Approved, Sept. 13 Conf. Hrg Set
----------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved
Arch Coal's Disclosure Statement and scheduled a September 13, 2016
hearing to consider its Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.  The
Plan incorporates and implements the terms of a global settlement
between Arch Coal and certain of its senior secured lenders that
hold more than 75% of its first lien term loan and the official
committee of unsecured creditors. John W. Eaves, Arch Coal's
chairman and C.E.O. states, "With the Court's approval of our
Disclosure Statement, a consensual proposed Plan of Reorganization
in place and a Plan confirmation hearing scheduled, Arch has
established a clear path for emerging from this restructuring
process as a strong, well-positioned competitor."  As previously
reported, "Under the Global Settlement, the Debtors will release
the Exchange Transactions Claims and the Employee Claims, and the
Lien Avoidance Claims will be settled on the terms and conditions
set forth in the Amended and Restated RSA. Additionally, the First
Lien Lenders will waive the Prepetition Adequate Protection Claims
and will agree to waive recoveries on account of the First Lien
Lender Deficiency Claim, subject to and in accordance with the
terms of the Plan.  The consideration for the settlement of the
Exchange Transactions Claims and the, Employee Claims and Lien
Avoidance Claims is provided by the distributions to unsecured
creditors and holders of First Lien Credit Facility Claims pursuant
to the Plan, which the Debtors, the Consenting Lenders and the
Creditors' Committee agree represent a fair compromise regarding
the extent and value of the First Lien Lenders' liens, including
the potential argument that the Knight Hawk Interest is encumbered
under the First Lien Credit Facility potential claims in respect of
any diminution in the value of the First Lien Lenders' collateral
and any potential recoveries on behalf of the Debtors' estates on
account of the Exchange Transaction Claims and the Employee
Claims."

                        About Arch Coal

Founded in 1969, Arch Coal, Inc., is a producer and marketer of
coal in the United States, with operations and coal reserves in
each of the major coal-producing regions of the Country.  As of
January 2016, it was the second-largest holder of coal reserves in
the United States, owning or controlling over five billion tons of
proven and probable reserves.  As of the Petition Date, Arch
employed approximately 4,600 full and part-time employees.

Arch Coal, Inc., and 71 of its affiliates filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case Nos. 16-40120 to
16-40191) on Jan. 11, 2016.  The petition was signed by Robert G.
Jones as senior vice president-law, general counsel and secretary.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $5.84 billion and total debt
of $6.45 billion.  Judge Charles E. Rendlen III has been assigned
the case.

The Debtors have engaged Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP as counsel,
Bryan Cave LLP as local counsel, FTI Consulting, Inc. as
restructuring advisor, PJT Partners as investment banker, and
Prime Clerk LLC as notice, claims and solicitation agent.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in
the case.  The Committee has retained Kramer Levin Naftalis &
Frankel LLP as counsel; Spencer Fane LLP as local counsel; Berkeley
Research Group, LLC as financial advisor; Jefferies LLC as
investment banker; and Blackacre LLC as coal consultant.


ATP OIL: BP Settlement Hearing Set for Aug. 15
----------------------------------------------
The Hon. Marvin Isgur of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas will hold a hearing on Aug. 15, 2016, at 10:30
a.m., in Courtroom 404, 4th Floor, 515 Rusk Avenue, Houston, Texas,
to consider the request for approval of a settlement with BP
Exploration and Production, Inc. -- on behalf of the BP Entities,
related to ATP's litigation claims related to the Deepwater Horizon
Spill -- filed by Rodney D. Tow, the chapter 7 Trustee of ATP Oil &
Gas Corporation.

The Court will consider evidence and arguments, appropriate.  The
court procedures located at
http://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/mi.pdf
have instructions for telephonic participation.

As reported by Troubled Company Reporter on June 2, 2016, the
chapter 7 Trustee sought Bankruptcy Court approval of his
settlement with BP Exploration.

The Deepwater Horizon Spill and its aftermath blocked ATP's plans
to drill and bring online six wells during 2010 and 2011. ATP had
already spent in excess of $1 billion in infrastructure
construction and other capital expenditures related to five of
these wells, and were denied the anticipated cash flow from these
wells.  The Deepwater Horizon Spill and its aftermath also required
ATP to interrupt two drilling operations that were then in process
at a significant cost to ATP, without providing for any relief from
the resulting costs of ceasing those drilling operations and
demobilizing the related drilling equipment and personnel.

The Chapter 7 Trustee and Motley Rice LLC and Fayard & Honeycutt
APC have been actively and vigorously prosecuting the ATP-BP
Litigation against the BP Entities.

The Trustee has settled the ATP-BP Litigation with the Settlement
Agreement, dated May 13, 2016.  Among other things, the Settlement
Agreement provides for (i) payment by BP Exploration and
Production, Inc. of $25,000,000 to the Trustee, payable over 5
years, commencing with a $5,000,000 payment on October 1, 2016, and
continuing each year thereafter with $5,000,000 annual payments on
October 1 of each year, with the last payment made on October 1,
2020, and (ii) exchange of mutual releases.  The Trustee and the BP
Entities will enter into the Full and Final Release, Settlement,
and Covenant Not to Sue between BPXP, on behalf of the BP Entities,
and the Trustee will become effective upon approval of the
Settlement Agreement by the Bankruptcy Court.

                       About ATP Oil

Houston, Texas-based ATP Oil & Gas Corporation is an international
offshore oil and gas development and production company focused in
the Gulf of Mexico, Mediterranean Sea and North Sea.

ATP Oil & Gas filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case
No. 12-36187) on Aug. 17, 2012.  Attorneys at Mayer Brown LLP,
serve as bankruptcy counsel.  Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., is
the conflicts counsel.  Motley Rice LLC and Fayard & Honeycutt, APC
serve as special counsel.  Opportune LLP is the financial advisor
and Jefferies & Company is the investment banker.  Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC is the claims and notice agent.

ATP disclosed assets of $3.6 billion and $3.5 billion of
liabilities as of March 31, 2012.  Debt includes $365 million on a
first-lien loan where Credit Suisse AG serves as agent.  There is
$1.5 billion on second-lien notes with Bank of New York MellonTrust
Co. as agent.  ATP's other debt includes $35 million on convertible
notes and $23.4 million owing to third parties for their shares of
production revenue.  Trade suppliers have  claims for $147 million,
ATP said in a court filing.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.  Evan R. Fleck, Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy,
in New York, represents the Creditors Committee as counsel.

A seven-member panel of equity security holders has also been
appointed in the case.  Kyung S. Lee, Esq., and Charles M. Rubio,
Esq. of Diamond McCarthy LLP, in Houston, Texas, serve as counsel
to the Equity Committee.

Judge Marvin Isgur of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas, Houston Division, issued an order on June 26,
2014, converting ATP Oil & Gas Corporation's Chapter 11 case to one
under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.


BBB INDUSTRIES: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR, Outlook Remains Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed BBB Industries U.S.
Holdings, Inc.'s B2 Corporate Family Rating and its B2-PD
Probability of Default Rating (PDR) after the company completed the
amendment of its senior secured credit facility.  Moody's assigned
a B1 rating to the company's $50 million add-on first lien term
loan and affirmed the B1 rating on its existing first lien credit
facility, consisting of a $295 million first lien term loan and a
$70 million revolver.  Moody's also affirmed the company's $100
million second lien term loan at Caa1.  The ratings outlook remains
stable.

Proceeds from the incremental term loan were used to repay $48
million of revolving borrowings and to pay the fees and expenses
associated with the transaction.  The add-on term loan has
substantially the same terms and conditions as the existing term
loan, including maturity of Nov. 3, 2021.

The affirmation of BBB's B2 CFR reflects Moody's view that the
company's overall financial leverage is not impacted by the
amendment of the credit agreement.  While the terming out of the
revolver debt enhances BBB's liquidity and affords the company
financial flexibility, prospects for near-term cash flow generation
remain a key concern given working capital investments associated
with rapid topline growth.

Moody's took these actions on BBB Industries U.S. Holdings, Inc.:

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed at B2

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed at B2-PD

  $70 Million Senior Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility
   due 2019, Affirmed at B1 (LGD3)

  $295 Million (Approximately $292 Million Outstanding) Senior
   Secured First Lien Term Loan due 2021, Affirmed at B1 (LGD3)

  $50 Million Senior Secured First Lien Add-On Term Loan due 2021,

   Assigned at B1 (LGD3)

  $100 Million Senior Secured Second Lien Term Loan due 2022,
   Affirmed at Caa1 (LGD5)

  Outlook, Remains at Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B2 CFR is constrained by BBB's high pro forma debt-to-EBITDA
leverage (Moody's adjusted) of around 5.6 times as of March 31,
2016, its modest scale in a fragmented and competitive industry,
high customer concentration and its North American regional focus.
The company has supplied rotating electrical (starters and
alternators) for over 20 years, steering parts to the automotive
aftermarket since 2010, and entered the brake caliper business
through an acquisition in 2013.  While the company has grown
through new customer wins and acquisitions over recent years, it
operates in a competitive marketplace with a number of similarly
sized competitors.  Further weighing on the rating is the high
level of customer concentration with the top three customers
representing nearly 60% of the company's revenue.  BBB's reliance
on financial draft programs also constrain the current rating.
Supporting the rating is the non-discretionary nature of the
company's replacement products, which are required for vehicle
operation.  As such, BBB is expected to benefit from the increasing
number and age of registered passenger cars in North America.
BBB's operating performance over the near-term is expected to
benefit from favorable industry dynamics as well as new business
wins with key customers across the company's three product lines:
rotating electrical, steering, and calipers. Moody's expects the
company to have adequate near term liquidity, including negative to
breakeven free cash flow over the next 12 months.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that the company
will experience mid-single digit revenue and EBITDA growth from new
business and improving operating margins over the next 12-18
months.  Moody's also expects the company to maintain an adequate
liquidity profile in the near term.

Developments that could lead to a lower rating include
deterioration in automotive aftermarket conditions which are not
offset by cost saving actions resulting in EBITA-to-interest
expense below 2.0 times or Debt-to-EBITDA sustained above 6.0
times.  An inability to onboard new business efficiently or a
deterioration in the company's liquidity profile, including
sustained negative free cash generation or inability to renew
customer finance draft programs could also lead to a downgrade.
Additionally, debt financed acquisitions or shareholder returns
could also result in a lower rating.

While not anticipated in the near term, considerations that could
lead to a change in outlook or upgrade of the rating include
continued improvement in scale and further customer
diversification, given the high level of customer concentration. An
upgrade would also require an improvement in operating performance
supporting the company's ability to maintain EBITA-to-interest
expense over 3.5 times and debt-to-EBITDA under 4.0 times, using
free cash flow to reduce debt on a consistent basis rather than for
shareholder returns.

BBB Industries U.S. Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Daphne,
Alabama, is a leading supplier of new and remanufactured automotive
replacement parts to the North American automotive and light truck
OEM and aftermarket.  The company's products include starters,
alternators, brake calipers, and power steering components.  BBB is
majority owned by affiliates of Pamplona Capital Management.  For
the last twelve month period ended March 31, 2016, the company
generated approximately $427 million in net revenue.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global
Automotive Supplier Industry published in June 2016.


BILTMORE INVESTMENTS: Bid to Junk Atty's Appeal Granted
-------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned BILTMORE INVESTMENTS, LTD., Appellant, v. TD
BANK, N.A., Appellee, Docket No. 1:15-cv-00194-MOC (W.D.N.C.),
Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr., of the United States District Court for
the Western District of North Carolina, Asheville Division, ruled
as follows:

   (1) Appellee TD Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Appeal for
failure to file Appellant's Brief was denied;

   (2) Appellant Biltmore Investments, Ltd.'s Motion to Dismiss
Appeal filed by Attorney Edward Hay was granted;

   (3) Biltmore's Motion for Leave to File Response to Motion to
Dismiss Appeal, filed by Attorney Scott Tufts was denied;

   (4) Appellant's Renewed Motion to Dismiss Appeal, filed by
Attorney Hay on behalf of Biltmore was granted.

A full-text copy of Judge Cogburn's June 29, 2016 order is
available at https://is.gd/f3U05d from Leagle.com.

Biltmore Investments, LTD. is represented by:

          Edward C. Hay, Jr., Esq.
          PITTS, HAY & HUGENSCHMIDT, P.A.
          137 Biltmore Avenue
          Asheville, NC 28801
          Tel: (828) 255-8085
          Fax: (828) 251-2760
          Email: ehay@phhlawfirm.com

            -- and --

          T. Scott Tufts, Esq.
          TUFTS LAW FIRM, PLLC
          111 S Maitland Ave, Ste 101
          Maitland, FL 32751
          Tel: (407) 647-8886
          Fax: (407) 641-8082

TD Bank, N.A. is represented by:

          Lance P. Martin, Esq.
          WARD AND SMITH, P.A.
          82 Patton Avenue, Suite 300 (28801)
          Post Office Box 2020
          Asheville, NC 28802-2020
          Tel: (828) 348-6070
          Fax: (828) 348-6077
          Email: lpm@wardandsmith.com

                    About Biltmore Investments

Biltmore Investments, LTD., based in Hendersonville, North
Carolina, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case
No. 11-10053) on Jan. 26, 2011.  Judge George R. Hodges presides
over the case.  Edward C. Hay, Jr., Esq. -- ehay@phhlawfirm.com --
at Pitts, Hay & Hugenschmidt, P.A., serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  It scheduled assets of $2,091,502 and debts
of $1,543,320.  The petition was signed by Watter T. McGee,
president.


BROOKLYN EVENTS: Bid Offers for Nightclub Due July 13
-----------------------------------------------------
MYC & Associates Inc. set July 13, 2016, at 5:00 p.m., as the
deadline for interested buyers for the property owned by Brooklyn
Events LLC, doing business as Verboten, located at 60 North 11th
St., Williamsburg, Brooklyn.  Minimum bid is $435,000.

For more information contact:

         Marc P. Yaverbaum
         MYC & ASSOCIATES, INC.
         Tel: (347) 273-1258
         E-mail: my@myccorp.com

                      About Brooklyn Events

Brooklyn Events, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)
(Case No. 16-41371) on March 31, 2016.  The petition was signed by
Jen Schiffer, managing member.

The Debtor is represented by Scott Markowitz, Esq., at Tarter
Krinsky & Drogin LLP. The case is assigned to Judge Carla E.
Craig.

The Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million.


CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Amends Proposed Merger Agreement with CAC
----------------------------------------------------------------
Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Acquisition Company
announced that they have agreed to amend the terms of their
proposed merger.  Caesars Entertainment and Caesars Acquisition
initially entered into a merger agreement in December 2014.

The amended and restated merger agreement represents an important
milestone in the ongoing restructuring of Caesars Entertainment
Operating Company, Inc., as the restructuring is contingent upon,
among other things, the completion of the merger.  In connection
with the amended and restated merger agreement, Caesars
Entertainment and Caesars Acquisition also amended and restated
their respective restructuring support agreements with CEOC, and
each entered into a voting support agreement with respect to the
proposed merger with affiliates of Apollo Global Management, LLC
and TPG Capital, LP.

Caesars Entertainment and CEOC are encouraged by the recent
progress made with key creditor groups, and are pleased with the
support received to date for CEOC's Plan of Reorganization. Caesars
Entertainment and CEOC are continuing to engage with remaining
creditor groups to achieve consensual agreements, and look forward
to commencing the voter solicitation process.

A confirmation hearing for CEOC's Plan of Reorganization has been
set for Jan. 17, 2017.

The amended and restated merger agreement was negotiated and
unanimously recommended by the Caesars Entertainment and Caesars
Acquisition special committees, each comprised solely of
independent members of their respective boards of directors.
Centerview Partners LLC served as the exclusive financial advisor
to the special committee of Caesars Entertainment and Reed Smith
LLP served as the special committee's legal counsel.  Moelis &
Company served as the exclusive financial advisor to the special
committee of Caesars Acquisition and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher
& Flom LLP served as the special committee's legal counsel.

The Original Merger Agreement has been amended and restated to
provide, among other things, the following:

The exchange ratio, pursuant to which shares of CAC's class A
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and CAC's class B common
stock, par value $0.001 per share, will be become exchangeable for
shares of CEC's common stock, par value $0.01 per share, has been
amended to ensure that holders of CAC Common Stock immediately
prior to the closing of the Merger will receive 27% of the
outstanding CEC Common Stock on a fully diluted basis (prior to
conversion of the New CEC Convertible Notes.  The Exchange Ratio
may be adjusted pursuant to the Amended Merger Agreement and such
adjustment will be determined on the earlier of (i) the date on
which the special committee of CAC's Board of Directors and the
special committee of CEC's Board of Directors, each composed solely
of independent directors, agree in writing as to the Exchange
Ratio, and (ii) the sixth business day following the date on which
the Adjustment Period ends.

The Adjustment Period is the 14-day period beginning on the date,
as soon as reasonably practicable following the date of the Amended
Merger Agreement, on which each of CAC and CEC has received written
confirmation from the other party that it and its respective
representatives have received certain information (which
information must be provided on request as soon as reasonably
practicable but no later than 30 days following the Confirmation
Date (as defined in the Amended Merger Agreement)) necessary for
such party's financial advisor to render a fairness opinion. During
the Adjustment Period, the CAC Special Committee, on behalf of CAC,
and the CEC Special Committee, on behalf of CEC, will determine
whether and to what extent it is necessary, appropriate and
advisable to adjust the Exchange Ratio.  The Exchange Ratio may be
adjusted solely to take into account certain tax costs and tax
attributes.

If at any time during the Adjustment Period the CEC Special
Committee or the CAC Special Committee determines that (i) it
cannot obtain a fairness opinion from its respective financial
advisor as a result of an adjustment to the Exchange Ratio based
solely on the factors set forth in the Amended Merger Agreement or
(ii) an adjustment to the Exchange Ratio based solely on the
factors set forth in the Amended Merger Agreement would not be
advisable or would otherwise be inconsistent with the directors'
fiduciary duties under applicable law, either the CEC Special
Committee or the CAC Special Committee may notify the other party
of such determination and, following delivery of such notice, the
parties will instead take into account all other relevant facts and
circumstances impacting the intrinsic value of CEC and CAC at such
time.

If the CEC Special Committee, on behalf of CEC, or the CAC Special
Committee, on behalf of CAC, (i) is unable to agree to an
adjustment to the Exchange Ratio by the end of the Adjustment
Period and determine in good faith, after consultation with outside
legal counsel, that failure to terminate the Amended Merger
Agreement would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with the
fiduciary duties of the directors of CEC or CAC, as applicable,
under applicable law or (ii) have not received, as of a date that
is reasonably proximate to the date on which the Adjustment Period
ends, an opinion of an independent, nationally recognized financial
advisor to the effect that, as of the date of such opinion, and
based upon and subject to the various assumptions made, procedures
followed, matters considered and limitations on the review
undertaken in preparing such opinion as set forth therein, the
Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to CEC or
CAC, as applicable, then the Amended Merger Agreement may be
terminated within five business days following the end of the
Adjustment Period.

The Amended Merger Agreement also contains an amended "Go-Shop"
provision on terms substantially the same as the "Go-Shop"
provision originally set forth in the Original Merger Agreement.
The Amended Merger Agreement also provides that (i) certain
existing litigation, under specified circumstances, (ii) certain
legislative changes and (iii) any change in the financial or
securities markets or in the market price or valuation of any
security or financial interest, or in the business, results of
operations or prospects of either of CEC or CAC, subject to certain
conditions, in each case will not provide cause for either the CEC
board of directors or the CAC board of directors to effect an
Adverse Recommendation Change.

CEC and CAC agreed that the sale of all or any part of the
businesses or properties of Caesars Interactive Entertainment, Inc.
will be subject to the approval of the CEC Special Committee.

The Amended Merger Agreement was fully negotiated by and between
the CEC Special Committee and the CAC Special Committee, was
recommended by each of the CEC Special Committee and the CAC
Special Committee and was approved by the CEC Board and the CAC
Board. Stockholders of each of CEC and CAC will be asked to vote on
the adoption of the Amended Merger Agreement at special meetings of
CEC's stockholders and CAC's stockholders, respectively, that will
each be held on a date to be announced. Pursuant to the Amended
Merger Agreement, CEC and CAC, as applicable, have agreed to file a
joint proxy statement/prospectus as soon as reasonably practicable
following the date of the Amended Merger Agreement.

The closing of the Merger is subject to the adoption of the Amended
Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
a majority of all outstanding shares of CEC Common Stock and CAC
Common Stock, respectively.  In addition to the closing conditions
originally set forth in the Original Merger Agreement, each of CEC
and CAC has agreed that their respective obligation to consummate
the Merger is subject to the fulfillment of the Plan containing the
Debtor Release, the Third-Party Release and the Exculpation.
However, the Amended Merger Agreement eliminated from the closing
conditions set forth in the Original Merger Agreement (i) minimum
cash closing conditions for both parties and (ii) a closing
condition that limited tax costs relating to the Restructuring to
close the Merger.

The Amended Merger Agreement provides certain termination rights to
each of CEC and CAC based on, among other things: (i) CEOC filing
(including any of its debtor subsidiaries), without CEC's or CAC's
prior written consent, respectively, (x) a plan of reorganization,
a disclosure statement or a proposed Confirmation Order that does
not include the Debtor Release, the Third-Party Release or the
Exculpation as to the CEC Released Parties or the CAC Released
Parties, respectively, in form and substance consistent in all
material respects with such provisions as set forth in the Plan or
(y) any motion, pleading or other document with the Bankruptcy
Court in the Chapter 11 Cases that is otherwise materially
inconsistent with the CEC RSA or CAC RSA, respectively, or the
Plan, (ii) the Confirmation Order (x) not including the Debtor
Release, the Third-Party Release or the Exculpation as to the CEC
Released Parties or the CAC Released Parties, respectively, in form
and substance consistent in all material respect with such
provisions as set forth in the Plan or (y) not being otherwise
materially consistent with the Plan, (iii) the 105 Injunction Order
no longer being in effect or, subject to certain conditions, CEOC
failing to file a motion on or before August 14, 2016, or such
earlier date as may be required by local rules governing the
Chapter 11 Cases for the filing of such motion, seeking to extend
the 105 Injunction Order currently in effect to the period ending
on the Confirmation Date, (iv) either of the Caesars RSAs being
terminated or becoming null and void or (v) the date on which the
Merger becomes effective not occurring by the close of business on
Dec. 31, 2017.

The amended and restated merger agreement represents an important
milestone in the ongoing restructuring of Caesars Entertainment
Operating Company, Inc., as the restructuring is contingent upon,
among other things, the completion of the merger.  In connection
with the amended and restated merger agreement, Caesars
Entertainment and Caesars Acquisition also amended and restated
their respective restructuring support agreements with CEOC, and
each entered into a voting support agreement with respect to the
proposed merger with affiliates of Apollo Global Management, LLC
and TPG Capital, LP.

                       Voting Agreement

Concurrently with the execution of the Amended Merger Agreement, on
July 9, 2016, CEC entered into a Voting Agreement among CEC, Hamlet
Holdings LLC, and solely with respect to certain provisions of the
Voting Agreement, affiliates of Apollo Global Management, LLC and
TPG Capital, LP and certain of their co-investors. Pursuant to that
certain irrevocable proxy, made and granted by the Holders on Oct.
21, 2013, Hamlet Holdings has the sole voting and sole dispositive
power with respect to 90,063,316 shares of CAC Common Stock, which
constitutes approximately 65.54% of the outstanding shares of CAC
Common Stock.

Subject to the terms of the Voting Agreement, Hamlet Holdings has
agreed to, among other things, (i) cause all of the Subject Shares
to be counted as present for purposes of calculating a quorum at
any meeting of stockholders of CAC, or any adjournment or
postponement thereof, (ii) vote the Subject Shares in favor of (x)
the adoption of the plan of merger contained in the Amended Merger
Agreement and (y) any other action, proposal, transaction or
agreement that would reasonably be expected to facilitate the
consummation of the Merger, subject to certain conditions, and
(iii) vote the Subject Shares against (x) any Acquisition Proposal
(as defined in the Amended Merger Agreement) or any action that
would reasonably be expected to impede, delay, discourage or
adversely affect the timely consummation of the Merger and (y) any
action to change the voting rights of any class of shares of CAC,
amend the organizational documents of CAC or amend the capital
structure of CAC.  In addition, Hamlet Holdings has agreed to
support, and cause its Members to support, the Restructuring and to
not, and to cause its Members to not, transfer, or agree to
transfer, any Subject Shares, subject to certain exceptions.

Either party may terminate the Voting Agreement upon providing
notice of termination to the other upon the occurrence of, among
other things, (i) a CAC Adverse Recommendation Change (as defined
in the Amended Merger Agreement) prior to obtaining the CAC
Requisite Vote (as defined in the Amended Merger Agreement), (ii)
the termination of the voting agreement entered into concurrently
with the Voting Agreement, among CAC, Hamlet Holdings and the
Holders, (iii) the termination of the Amended Merger Agreement,
subject to certain exceptions, (iv) Dec. 31, 2017 or (v) the time
the Merger becomes effective.  In certain circumstances, Hamlet
Holdings may also terminate the Voting Agreement if either the
Amended Merger Agreement or the Plan is amended in a manner that
adversely affects Hamlet Holdings or certain related entities.

                         Amended RSA

In connection with the entry into the Amended Merger Agreement and
the Voting Agreement, on July 9, 2016, CEC and CEOC agreed to amend
and restate the Restructuring Support, Settlement and Contribution
Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2016, between CEC and CEOC.  The
Amended RSA amended the CEC RSA to, among other things, (i) require
CEC to use reasonable best efforts to cause the meeting of the
holders of shares of CEC Common Stock for purposes of seeking the
CEC Requisite Vote to be held and completed prior to the date that
is ten days prior to the commencement date of the confirmation
hearing in the Chapter 11 cases, in compliance with the terms of
the Amended Merger Agreement and (ii) cease to be effective on the
Voting Deadline Date, unless prior to the Voting Deadline Date,
each of the CEC Requisite Vote and the CAC Requisite Vote has been
validly obtained, unless the Voting Deadline Date is waived or
extended by CEOC.

                   About Caesars Entertainment

Caesars Entertainment Corp., formerly Harrah's Entertainment Inc.,
is one of the world's largest casino companies.  Caesars casino
resorts operate under the Caesars, Bally's, Flamingo, Grand
Casinos, Hilton and Paris brand names.  The Company has its
corporate headquarters in Las Vegas.  Harrah's announced its
re-branding to Caesar's in mid-November 2010.

In January 2015, Caesars Entertainment and subsidiary Caesars
Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., announced that holders of
more than 60% of claims in respect of CEOC's 11.25% senior secured
notes due 2017, CEOC's 8.5% senior secured notes due 2020 and
CEOC's 9% senior secured notes due 2020 have signed the Amended and
Restated Restructuring Support and Forbearance Agreement, dated as
of Dec. 31, 2014, among Caesars Entertainment, CEOC and the
Consenting Creditors.  As a result, The RSA became effective
pursuant to its terms as of Jan. 9, 2015.

Appaloosa Investment Limited, et al., owed $41 million on account
of 10% second lien notes in the company, filed an involuntary
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition against CEOC (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 15-10047) on Jan. 12, 2015.  The bondholders are represented
by Robert S. Brady, Esq., at Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor
LLP.

CEOC and 172 other affiliates -- operators of 38 gaming and resort
properties in 14 U.S. states and 5 countries -- filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bank. N.D. Ill.  Lead Case No. 15-01145) on
Jan. 15, 2015.  CEOC disclosed total assets of $12.3 billion and
total debt of $19.8 billion as of Sept. 30, 2014.

Delaware Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross entered a ruling that the
bankruptcy proceedings will proceed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois.

Kirkland & Ellis serves as the Debtors' counsel.  AlixPartners is
the Debtors' restructuring advisors.  Prime Clerk LLC acts as the
Debtors' notice and claims agent.  Judge Benjamin Goldgar presides
over the cases.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed seven noteholders to serve in the
Official Committee of Second Priority Noteholders and nine members
to serve in the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee.

The U.S. Trustee appointed Richard S. Davis as Chapter 11 examiner.


CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Hamlet Reports 60.1% Stake as of July 9
--------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Hamlet Holdings LLC disclosed that as of July 9, 2016,
it beneficially owns 87,605,299 shares of common stock of Caesars
Entertainment Corporation representing 60.14 percent of the shares
outstanding.  The calculation is based on 145,660,683 shares of
Common Stock outstanding as of May 1, 2016, which figure is based
on information set forth in the quarterly report for the
Corporation for the period ending March 31, 2016, filed by the
Corporation with the SEC on May 5, 2016.  A full-text copy of the
regulatory filing is available for free at https://is.gd/nGr84k

                  About Caesars Entertainment

Caesars Entertainment Corp., formerly Harrah's Entertainment Inc.,
is one of the world's largest casino companies.  Caesars casino
resorts operate under the Caesars, Bally's, Flamingo, Grand
Casinos, Hilton and Paris brand names.  The Company has its
corporate headquarters in Las Vegas.  Harrah's announced its
re-branding to Caesar's in mid-November 2010.

In January 2015, Caesars Entertainment and subsidiary Caesars
Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., announced that holders of
more than 60% of claims in respect of CEOC's 11.25% senior secured
notes due 2017, CEOC's 8.5% senior secured notes due 2020 and
CEOC's 9% senior secured notes due 2020 have signed the Amended and
Restated Restructuring Support and Forbearance Agreement, dated as
of Dec. 31, 2014, among Caesars Entertainment, CEOC and the
Consenting Creditors.  As a result, The RSA became effective
pursuant to its terms as of Jan. 9, 2015.

Appaloosa Investment Limited, et al., owed $41 million on account
of 10% second lien notes in the company, filed an involuntary
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition against CEOC (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 15-10047) on Jan. 12, 2015.  The bondholders are represented
by Robert S. Brady, Esq., at Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor
LLP.

CEOC and 172 other affiliates -- operators of 38 gaming and resort
properties in 14 U.S. states and 5 countries -- filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bank. N.D. Ill.  Lead Case No. 15-01145) on
Jan. 15, 2015.  CEOC disclosed total assets of $12.3 billion and
total debt of $19.8 billion as of Sept. 30, 2014.

Delaware Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross entered a ruling that the
bankruptcy proceedings will proceed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois.

Kirkland & Ellis serves as the Debtors' counsel.  AlixPartners is
the Debtors' restructuring advisors.  Prime Clerk LLC acts as the
Debtors' notice and claims agent.  Judge Benjamin Goldgar presides
over the cases.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed seven noteholders to serve in the
Official Committee of Second Priority Noteholders and nine members
to serve in the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee.

The U.S. Trustee appointed Richard S. Davis as Chapter 11 examiner.


CHAPARRAL ENERGY: Claims Bar Date Set for Aug. 19, 2016
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware set Aug. 19,
2016, at 5:00 p.m. (Prevailing Pacific Time) as the deadline for
persons of entities to file proofs of claim against Chaparral
Energy Inc. and its debtor-affiliates.

The Court also set Nov. 7, 2016, at 5:00 p.m. (Prevailing Pacific
Time) as the last day for governmental units to file their claims
against the Debtors.

A copy of the bar date order and proof of claim form may be
obtained by contacting the Debtors' claims agent, in writing, at
KCC, 2335 Alaska Avenue, El Segundo, CA 90245, or, online at
http://www.kccllc.net/chaparralenergy

                      About Chaparral Energy

Founded in 1988, Chaparral Energy, Inc., is a Delaware corporation
headquartered in Oklahoma City and a pure play Mid-Continent
independent oil and natural gas exploration and production
company.

At March 31, 2016, the Company had total assets of $1,229,373,000,
total current liabilities of $1,940,742,000 and total stockholders'
deficit of $759,546,000.

Chaparral Energy, Inc., and its 10 affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case
No. 16-11144) on May 9, 2016.  The petition was signed by Mark A.
Fischer, chief executive officer.

The Debtors are represented by Richard Levy, Esq., Keith Simon,
Esq., David McElhoe, Esq., and Marc Zelina, Esq., at Latham &
Watkins LLP; and Mark D. Collins, Esq., at Richards, Layton &
Finger, P.A., as counsel.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC serves
as administrative advisor.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on May 18 disclosed in a court
filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 cases of Chaparral Energy, Inc. and its
affiliates.


CLAIRE'S STORES: Sees $25M-$29M Operation Income for Q2 2016
------------------------------------------------------------
In a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Claire's Stores, Inc. disclosed that quarter-to-date same store
sales as of July 10, 2016, are -5.9%, consisting of -4.2% for North
America and -8.6% for Europe.  In addition, the Company currently
expects Adjusted EBITDA to be between $37 million and $41 million
for the 2016 fiscal second quarter compared to $59.9 million in the
same quarter last year.  

Similarly, the Company expects to report operating income for the
fiscal 2016 second quarter in the range of $25 to $29 million
compared to $38.7 million in the fiscal 2015 second quarter.  The
Company computes same store sales on a local currency basis, which
eliminates any impact from changes in foreign currency exchange
rates.  These same store sales results and Adjusted EBITDA
estimates are unaudited and should be considered preliminary and
subject to change.  A copy of the regulatory filing is available
for free at https://is.gd/rZJ0bU

                       About Claire's Stores

Claire's Stores, Inc. -- http://www.clairestores.com/-- operates
as a specialty retailer of fashion accessories and jewelry for
preteens and teenagers, as well as for young adults in North
America and internationally.  It offers jewelry products that
comprise costume jewelry, earrings, and ear piercing services; and
accessories, including fashion accessories, hair ornaments,
handbags, and novelty items.

Based in Pembroke Pines, Florida, Claire's Stores operates under
two brands: Claire's(R), which operates worldwide and Icing(R),
which operates only in North America.  As of Jan. 31, 2009,
Claire's Stores, Inc., operated 2,969 stores in North America and
Europe.  Claire's Stores also operates through its subsidiary,
Claire's Nippon, Co., Ltd., 213 stores in Japan as a 50:50 joint
venture with AEON, Co., Ltd.  The Company also franchises 198
stores in the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, South Africa, Poland
and Guatemala.

As of April 30, 2016, Claire's Stores had $2.27 billion in total
assets, $2.87 billion in total liabilities and a stockholders'
deficit of $606 million.

                           *     *     *

The TCR reported on April 11, 2016, that Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Claire's Stores, Inc. Corporate Family Rating (CFR) and
Probability of Default Rating to Caa3 and Caa3-PD, respectively.
"[The] downgrades reflect our view that there is an acute
likelihood of a debt restructuring ahead of the June 2017 maturity
of Claire's subordinated notes due to continuing erosion of
liquidity and weak operating performance," stated Moody's Vice
President Charlie O'Shea.

As reported by the TCR on May 20, 2016, S&P Global Ratings raised
its corporate credit rating on Florida-based Claire's Stores Inc.
to 'CCC-' from 'SD'.  The outlook is negative.


CLOUD CRANE: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B2 CFR and B2-PD PDR to first
time issuer Cloud Crane, LLC.  The company's $470 million 8 year
Second Lien Senior Secured Notes were rated B3 (LGD 5).  The
company's $650 million ABL (only $500 million available until the
AmQuip acquisition closes) is not rated by Moody's.  The rating
outlook is stable.  Proceeds from the transaction are to fund the
acquisition of Maxim Crane Works, L.P. and AmQuip by Apollo Global
Management, LLC (Apollo).  The current Maxim ratings will be
withdrawn upon the acquisition.

Moody's has assigned these ratings:

  Corporate Family Rating, B2;

  Probability of Default Rating, B2-PD;

  Second Priority Senior Secured Notes, B3 (LGD 5);

  Stable Rating Outlook

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating assignment of a B2 CFR reflects anticipated leverage for
the rating of 4.9 times on a Moody's adjusted basis balanced
against the benefits of good demand dynamics due to competitive
cost advantage offered though crane rental versus ownership, a
customer base that includes blue chip companies, and long lived
assets.  The large equity contribution by the sponsor was also
considered in the rating.  Moody's leverage calculation includes
both the acquisition of Maxim and the acquisition of AmQuip
Holdings Corp. (AmQuip), both market leading crane rental
companies.  Although we do not anticipate meaningful differences in
timing for the acquisition of Maxim and AmQuip, the ABL, and the
second lien notes may initially be sized to reflect the acquisition
of Maxim and then be adjusted for the acquisition of AmQuip.

The Cloud Crane ratings assume the successful purchase and
integration of Maxim and AmQuip and the expectation for a strong
market position and the belief that the combined company will
benefit from cost savings and synergies.  The companies have modest
geographic overlap with Maxim Crane's largest presence being in the
South and AmQuip's in the Northeast.  The combined company should
be able to better serve multi-location customers and better deploy
its rental assets among projects to maximize utilization.  The
combined entity is anticipated to have revenues of over $700
million with Maxim comprising the majority at slightly over $500
million.  Cloud Crane should see improvement in margins as a result
of cost savings by eliminating duplication and facility overlap and
by better managing a larger fleet so as to reduce the need for
re-rents.

Maxim's liquidity is anticipated to be adequate as a result of
positive free cash flow, good revolver availability, sufficient
covenant room, but few non-pledged assets available for sale, and
minimal cash balances.  With the acquisition of both Maxim and
AmQuip, the company would have a $650 million ABL revolver due 2021
and $485 million is expected to be drawn at close.  In the unlikley
event that only Maxim Crane is acquired, the company would have a
$500 million ABL revolver with $300 million draw at close.  The
revolver has a springing financial covenant based on minimum levels
of excess availability, to be tested against a fixed charge
coverage ratio of 1.0 times.  Moody's expects the company to cover
any potential negative cash flow from operations and capital
expenditures to be filled by minor asset dispositions and further
borrowings on the ABL facility.

The stable rating outlook reflects the company's good positioning
in the rating category and the view that it should be able to cut
costs and manage its fleet effectively so as to protect creditor
interests in the event of a mild downturn.  The stable outlook also
reflects Maxim management's track record in shifting its equipment
portfolio to reflect business opportunities and risks.
Specifically, by focusing on the larger crane rental space we
believe the company is better positioned in a mild downturn as the
smaller less expensive cranes are likely to see greater pricing
volatility due to the number of small operators in the market.

The rating could be downgraded if leverage increased to and
sustained at over 5 times, if revenues declined by 15% in any year,
or EBITDA / interest fell below 2.5 times, all numbers on a Moody's
adjusted basis.

The rating could be upgraded if leverage falls below 4 times and
was anticipated to improve further.  However, because of the highly
cyclical nature of the industry, strong liquidity would be
necessary in order for an upgrade to occur.

Cloud Crane, LLC (Cloud) was created by Apollo Global Management,
LLC to purchase Maxim Crane Works, L.P. from affiliates of Platinum
Equity Capital Partners II, L.P. Cloud's largest subsidiary will be
Maxim Crane Works Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Bridgeville,
Pennsylvania, a holding company conducting operations through its
subsidiary Maxim Crane Works, L.P.  The company rents cranes and
other heavy equipment primarily to energy-related and
non-residential building construction end markets.  As of March 31,
2016, the company had a fleet of over 1,390 cranes, including
hydraulic truck cranes, all-terrain cranes, rough terrain cranes,
crawler cranes and tower cranes.  LTM revenues for March 2016 were
approximately $515 million. Apollo is also purchasing AmQuip with
the intention of merging both companies.  If the merger closes,
combined revenues are anticipated to approximate $700 million
annually.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Equipment and
Transportation Rental Industry published in December 2014.


COMBIMATRIX CORP: Signs Repurchase Agreement with Stockholders
--------------------------------------------------------------
CombiMatrix Corporation entered into a Common Stock Purchase
Warrants Repurchase Agreement with the holders of its outstanding
common stock purchase warrants issued in October 2012, March 2013,
May 2013, June 2013, June 2014, February 2015 and April 2015 in
connection with the Company's Series A, Series B, Series C and
Series E financings.  Pursuant to the terms of the Repurchase
Agreement, the Company has agreed to repurchase the Warrants from
each Holder upon a Fundamental Transaction at various negotiated
prices per Warrant share as set forth in the Repurchase Agreement.

Under the terms of the Repurchase Agreement, the Company will
repurchase half of the Warrants upon the announcement of a
Fundamental Transaction and the remaining half of the Warrants upon
the closing of a Fundamental Transaction.  In addition, upon the
closing of a Fundamental Transaction, all Securities Purchase
Agreements and Registration Rights Agreements associated with the
original issuances of the Warrants will be terminated and the
various restrictions set forth therein will no longer be of any
force or effect.  In connection with entering into the Repurchase
Agreement, the Company was granted certain consents and waivers
relating to a Fundamental Transaction.  In the event that a
Fundamental Transaction is announced and consummated, the Company
will be obligated to repurchase the Warrants for approximately
$459,000 of cash consideration paid to the Holders.  In the event
that a Fundamental Transaction is not announced and consummated,
the Company will not be obligated to repurchase the Warrants.

                      About Combimatrix

Combimatrix specializes in pre-implantation genetic screening,
miscarriage analysis, prenatal and pediatric healthcare, offering
DNA-based testing for the detection of genetic abnormalities beyond
what can be identified through traditional methodologies.  Its
clinical lab and corporate offices are located in Irvine,
California.

Combimatrix reported a net loss of $6.60 million in 2015 compared
to a net loss of $8.70 million in 2014.  As of March 31, 2016,
Combimatrix had $11.20 million in total assets, $2.52 million in
total liabilities and $8.68 million in total stockholders' equity.

Haskell & White LLP, in Irvine, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company has limited
working capital and a history of incurring net losses and net
operating cash flow deficits.  These conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


COMDISCO HOLDING: Court Approves Closure of Chapter 11 Case
-----------------------------------------------------------
Comdisco Holding Company, Inc. and on July 13, 2016, disclosed,
that on July 12, 2016, Comdisco and Comdisco, Inc., obtained a
final decree and order from the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division (the "Bankruptcy
Court") approving a motion (the "Motion") (i) closing the chapter
11 case of Comdisco, Inc.; (ii) authorizing the Company to complete
certain outstanding administrative tasks following entry of the
Final Decree; (iii) approving the proposed manner of disposing of
and disbursing remaining Company assets; (iv) confirming the
exculpation of the Plan Implementation Parties (as defined in the
Motion); (v) terminating the services of the claims and noticing
agent and disbursing agent; and (vi) retaining jurisdiction to
enforce or interpret its own orders pertaining to the chapter 11
cases including, but not limited to, the Plan and the Final Decree.


In addition, Comdisco disclosed, that on July 12, 2016, its Board
of Directors declared a final cash dividend of $4.5642 per share of
the Company's common stock, totaling approximately $18,389,000, to
be paid on August 5, 2016 to common stockholders of record as of
July 25, 2016 (the "Final Cash Dividend").  Comdisco has
approximately 4.0 million shares of common stock outstanding.
Computershare will serve as paying agent for the Final Cash
Dividend. Comdisco intends to treat this distribution for income
tax purposes as the final payment in a series of liquidating
distributions in complete liquidation of the Company.

Comdisco also disclosed that on July 12, 2016, its Board of
Directors approved a final cash distribution of $0.07707 per
contingent distribution right ("CDR"), totaling approximately
$11,128,000, to be paid on August 5, 2016 to CDR holders of record
as of July 25, 2016 (the "Final CDR Distribution").  Comdisco has
approximately 144.4 million contingent distribution rights
outstanding.  Computershare will serve as paying agent for the
Final CDR Distribution.

The Final Cash Dividend and the Final CDR Distribution,
collectively, shall constitute the "Final Distribution".  This is a
final distribution from the estate of Comdisco, Inc.  The Final
Distribution does not include common stock and CDRs held by the
Comdisco Litigation Trust or any CDRs held by the Company.  Upon
the making of the Final Distribution, the outstanding shares of
common stock and the outstanding CDRs shall be cancelled and deemed
null, void and worthless.  The Company expects to file Form 15 with
the SEC no later than August 11, 2016 which terminates its 12(g)
Registration.  Thereafter, the Company will no longer be a public
company and not be required to file future periodic reports with
the SEC.

Contingent Distribution Rights

The Plan entitles holders of Comdisco's CDRs to share at increasing
percentages in proceeds realized from Comdisco's assets after the
minimum percentage recovery threshold was achieved in May, 2003.
The sharing percentage is currently at 37%, which is the maximum
sharing percentage.  The Final CDR Distribution includes a CDR
payment in the amount of approximately $370,000 (based on the
likely anticipated future distribution to the general unsecured
creditors reported by the litigation trustee of Trust Assets in its
supplement to the final report filed with the Bankruptcy Court on
October 6, 2015).

As a result of the bankruptcy restructuring transactions, the
adoption of fresh-start reporting, multiple asset sales, and the
adoption of liquidation basis of accounting, Comdisco's financial
results are not comparable to those of its predecessor company,
Comdisco, Inc.

                         About Comdisco

Comdisco emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings on August
12, 2002.  The purpose of reorganized Comdisco was to sell, collect
or otherwise reduce to money in an orderly manner the remaining
assets of the corporation.  Pursuant to the Plan and restrictions
contained in its certificate of incorporation, Comdisco was
specifically prohibited from engaging in any business activities
inconsistent with its limited business purpose.  Accordingly,
Comdisco has reduced all of its assets to cash and this is the
final distribution of all available cash (net of amounts withheld
for estimated liabilities) to holders of its common stock and
contingent distribution rights in the manner and priorities set
forth in the Plan.  Once all the administrative tasks (as detailed
in the Motion) are completed, the company will cease operations.
The company filed on August 12, 2004 a Certificate of Dissolution
with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to formally
extinguish Comdisco Holding Company, Inc.'s corporate existence
with the State of Delaware except for the purpose of completing the
wind-down contemplated by the Plan.  Under the Plan, Comdisco was
charged with, and has been, liquidating its assets.


CONSTELLATION ENTERPRISES: Asks Court to Set Claims Bar Date
------------------------------------------------------------
Constellation Enterprises LLC et al., ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware to establish these deadlines for
filing proofs of claim:

   (a) except as otherwise provided herein, the date to be
       designated by the Debtors, in a Bar Date Notice to be filed

       with the Court, which date shall be no earlier than the
       first business day that is at least 30 days after the date
       of service (the "Service Date") of the notice of Bar Dates,

       at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Pacific Time) (the "General Bar
       Date"), as the deadline for all persons and entities
       holding a claim against any of the Debtors that arose prior

       to the Petition Date, including a claim against any of the
       Debtors for the value of goods sold to the Debtors in the
       ordinary course of business and received by the Debtors
       within 20 days before the Petition Date (a "509(b)(9)
       Claim"), to file a Proof of Claim in the Chapter 11 Cases;

   (b) November 14, 2016, at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Pacific Time)
       (the "Governmental Unit Bar Date"), as the deadline for
       each governmental unit (as defined in Bankruptcy Code
       section 101(27)), holding a claim against any of the
       Debtors, to file a Proof of Claim in the Chapter 11 Cases;

   (c) if the Debtors file an amendment to any of their schedules
       of liabilities after the Service Date, and such Amendment
       (a) reduces the undisputed, noncontingent, and liquidated
       amount of a claimant's claim, (b) changes the nature or
       characterization of a claimant's claim, or (c) adds a new
       claim with respect to a claimant to the Schedules, such
       claimant must file a Proof of Claim with respect to such
       amended claim by the later of (i) the General Bar Date or
       (ii) 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Pacific Time) on the date that
       is 21 days after service of a notice on such affected
       claimant of the Amendment; and

   (d) except as otherwise set forth in any order authorizing
       rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease, the
       later of (i) the General Bar Date or (ii) twenty-one 21
       days after entry of any order authorizing the rejection of
       an executory contract or unexpired lease, as the deadline
       to file a Proof of Claim relating to the Debtors' rejection

       of such executory contract or unexpired lease.

A hearing on the Motion is scheduled for July 22, 2016.

The Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware granted Constellation Enterprises LLC, et
al., an extension of the deadline to file their schedules of assets
and liabilities, and statements of financial affairs through and
including June 22, 2016.

The Court order was entered on July 5.  The Debtors, accordingly,
filed their schedules and statements on June 22.

Constellation Enterprises LLC listed $348,616.57 in combined real
and personal property against $159,722,667.81 in liabilities,
including $1,634,457.38 in unsecured nonpriority claims.

Columbus Holdings Inc listed $0 in combined real and personal
property against $158,088,210.43 in secured claims.

                About Constellation Enterprises

Constellation Enterprises LLC, through its subsidiaries,
manufactures custom engineered metal components for various end
markets such as rail transportation, oil and gas, general
industrial, nuclear, aerospace, and small gas engine markets. The
company was incorporated in 1996 and is based in Caldwell, Texas.

Constellation Enterprises LLC (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 16-11213)
and its affiliates Columbus Holdings, Inc. (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
16-11214), Columbus Steel Castings Company (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
16-11215), Eclipse Manufacturing Co. (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
16-11219), JFC Holding Corporation (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
16-11221), Metal Technology Solutions, Inc. (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 16-11218), Steel Forming, Inc. (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
16-11220), The Jorgensen Forge Corporation (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
16-11222), Zero Corporation (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 16-11216), and
Zero Manufacturing, Inc. (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 16-11217) filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on May 16, 2016.

The petitions were signed by William Lowry, chief financial
officer.

The Debtors estimated their assets at between $1 million and $10
million and their debts at between $100 million and $500 million.

Adam C. Rogoff, Esq., and Joseph A. Shifer, Esq., at Kramer Levin
Naftalis & Frankel LLP serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

Daniel J. DeFranceschi, Esq., Zachary I. Shapiro, Esq., Rachel L.
Biblo, Esq., and Joseph C. Barsalona II, Esq., at Richards, Layton
& Finger, P.A., serve as the Debtors' co-counsel.

Imperial Capital, LLC, is the Debtors' financial advisor. Conway
Mackenzie Management Services LLC is the Debtors' crisis management
& restructuring services provider.

Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, is the Debtors' claims and noticing
agent.         



DPL INC: Fitch Affirms 'B+' Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings
(IDR) of DPL Inc. (DPL) at 'B+' and Dayton Power Light & Company
(DP&L) at 'BB+'. The Rating Outlook for both entities has been
revised to Negative from Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

-- Ohio Supreme Court order jeopardises pending ESP;
-- Alternative rate relief needed to maintain ratings;
-- Near-term financial flexibility impaired.

The ratings affirmation and revision of the Rating Outlook follows
the Ohio Supreme Court's rejection of DP&L's "service stability
rider" (SSR) charge which could have material negative credit
impact on DP&L and DPL. In addition to cash flow reduction in the
near term, the court ruling could jeopardise the extension of a
similar rate structure beyond 2016 as requested in DP&L's pending
Electric Security Plan (ESP) filed with the Public Utility
Commission of Ohio (PUCO) in February 2016. Fitch views the receipt
of these payments as key to reducing leverage at DP&L and DPL.

The resolution of the Negative Outlook will depend upon the amount,
sustainability and timeliness of alternative regulatory rate relief
from PUCO, as well as the companies' ability to refinance or repay
the 2016 maturities in a timely manner with reasonable terms.

The Ohio Supreme Court ruling terminates collection of the
remaining SSR in 2016 of approximately $55 million per Fitch's
estimate; $250 million of SSR payments that have been collected are
not subject to refund. The ruling is an adverse development that
casts doubt upon the proposed extension in the pending ESP of a
similar rate structure to the SSR. This rate structure is an
alternative to a "reliable electricity rider" (RER) which is
similar to the Purchased Power Agreements (PPA) proposed by other
Ohio utilities. Fitch notes that the PPAs have been largely
abandoned by other Ohio utilities due to jurisdictional issues.

Fitch continues to believe that the PUCO will ultimately authorize
an alternative rider for DP&L to mitigate the Ohio Supreme Court
ruling. However, the path and timing to that end are primary credit
concerns.

The court ruling has negative implications for DPL and DP&L's
liquidity due to loss of cash flow from SSR and associated
uncertainties surrounding the 2016 maturities. However, the
companies should have sufficient liquidity to cover net cash needs
in the next 12 months. Fitch projects DPL and DP&L to be modestly
free cash flow positive in 2016 and expects negative free cash flow
in 2017 without additional rate relief.

As of March 31, 2016, DP&L has $445 million first mortgage bonds
due on Sept. 15, 2016 and DPL has $57 million senior unsecured
notes due in October 2016. DP&L's $100 million 2006 pollution
control bonds due in 2036 can be called at par on Sept. 1, 2016.
Although Fitch believes that most of these maturities will be
refinanced or repaid as planned, the possibility of achieving
desirable financing terms and flexibility of the timing of
execution are likely reduced.

Fitch intends to maintain a three-notch differential between the
IDRs of DPL and DP&L. This is due to Fitch's belief that the
existing regulatory measures, such as the capital structure
requirement and restriction on dividend in case of negative
retained earnings, provide some protection of DP&L's credit
quality, but don't effectively insulate it from DPL in certain
distress scenarios.

The debt instrument rating at DPL is notched above or below the IDR
as a result of the relative recovery prospects in a hypothetical
default scenario. Fitch affirms the instrument rating for DPL based
on a recovery analysis. Fitch values the power generation assets
using a net present value (NPV) analysis and the equity value in
DP&L is added to derive DPL's enterprise value for the recovery
analysis. Fitch assigned a 'BB/RR2' rating to DPL's senior secured
revolving credit facility and term loan. The 'RR2' rating reflects
a two-notch differential from the 'B+' IDR and indicates that Fitch
estimates superior recovery of principal and related interest of
between 71% - 90%. Fitch also assigned a 'BB-/RR3' rating to DPL's
senior unsecured notes, reflecting a one-notch differential from
the 'B+' IDR, implying good recovery of principal and related
interest of between 51% - 70%.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Several rate relief scenarios and correspondent deleveraging
    levels and timing were assumed;
-- No equity support from AES;
-- DP&L's debt-to-cap ratio assumed to reach 50% in 2018.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Positive: Future developments that may, individually or
collectively, lead to positive rating action include:

DPL and DP&L's rating Outlook can be stabilized if prospective rate
relief is forthcoming, such that DPL's consolidated adjusted
debt-to-operating EBITDAR can sustain comfortably below 6x and/or
FFO-lease adjusted leverage below 6.5x. Divesture of DPL's merchant
generation after the separation, in part or whole, could result in
positive rating actions.

Negative: Future developments that may, individually or
collectively, lead to a negative rating action include:

Rating downgrades at DPL could be triggered by the absence of
timely regulatory support in Ohio and/or continued challenging
market conditions for its merchant generation business.
Deterioration of DPL's consolidated adjusted debt-to-operating
EBITDAR ratio on a sustained basis to above 7x or FFO-lease
adjusted leverage sustained above 7.5x without a visible path for
recovery could result in rating downgrades.

If DP&L fails to refinance its first mortgage bonds in 2016 with
reasonable terms, ratings may be downgraded. Other factors that
could cause negative rating actions include, but are not limited
to, lower-than-expected cash flow at DP&L or the inability to
execute deleveraging at DP&L, such that the future transmission and
distribution utility's stand-alone debt-to-operating EBITDAR and
FFO-lease adjusted leverage sustain above investment grade
guideline ratios of 5x and 6x, respectively.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

DPL, Inc.
-- Long-Term IDR at 'B+';
-- Short-Term IDR at 'B';
-- Secured debt at 'BB/RR2';
-- Senior unsecured debt at 'BB-/RR3'.

Dayton Power & Light Company
-- Long-Term IDR at 'BB+';
-- Senior secured debt at 'BBB';
-- Preferred stock at 'BB';
-- Short-Term IDR at 'B'.

DPL Capital Trust II
-- Junior subordinate debt at 'B/RR5'.

The Ratings Outlook has been revised to Negative from Stable.


ENERGY DRILLING: Pacific Energy Asks for Independent Trustee
------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific Energy & Mining Company filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Utah a motion for the appointment of an
independent trustee to take control of Energy Drilling, LLC's
bankruptcy estate under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1104(a).

Pacific Energy says that Energy Drilling sought bankruptcy
protection after it sustained a significant summary judgment loss
in the U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming in
litigation against Pacific Energy.  Pacific Energy asserts that
based on the Debtor's dishonest and illegal conduct prior to and
during that litigation as well as the Debtor's similar conduct in
the case, an independent trustee must be appointed to protect the
bankruptcy estate and the interests of the Debtor's creditors,
including Pacific Energy.

According to Pacific Energy, in May 2014 it contracted the Debtor
to drill a natural gas well in Grant County, Utah.  Pacific made
payments of $1,063,988 in May and June 2014.  The Debtor's
equipment failures and delays caused drilling operations to extend.
In September 2014, Pacific sued the Debtor for, inter alia, breach
of contract.

Attorney for Pacific Energy & Mining Company:

         Terry R. Spencer, Esq.
         TERRY R. SPENCER & ASSOCIATES
         140 W 9000 S
         Sandy, UT 84070
         Tel: (801) 566-1884
         Fax: (801) 748-4022
         E-mail: terry@trspencer.com

                       About Energy Drilling

Energy Drilling, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Utah
Case No. 16-23671) on April 29, 2016.  Thomas H. Richards, Esq., at
Thomas Richards, P.C., serves as counsel.  The Debtor estimated
$500,000 to $1 million in assets and debt.


ENERGY FUTURE: Court Approves Modified TCEH DIP Order
-----------------------------------------------------
Honorable Christopher S. Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware entered an amended order approving the
postpetition financing for Texas Competitive Electric Holdings
Company LLC, and Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC.

As previously reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, Judge
Sontchi authorized Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC,
and Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC, to enter into
the commitment letter under which Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch
and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Barclays Bank PLC, Citigroup
Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse AG and Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, Royal Bank of Canada and RBC Capital Markets, UBS AG,
Stamford Branch and UBS Securities LLC, and Natixis, New York
Branch, committed to provide financing to the TCEH Debtors.

The TCEH Debtors' current DIP loans under the Existing DIP Credit
Agreement will mature on November 7, 2016, and the Debtors
anticipate that they may require debtor-in-possession financing
beyond that date, in addition to requiring exit financing upon
emergence.  To fulfill that need, the TCEH Debtors obtained
commitments from several large financial institutions for fully
underwritten financing and now seek authorization to enter into the
Financing Papers with the Commitment Parties and the financing
contemplated therein.

The Amended Order takes effect immediately upon the Closing Date,
which nullifies and voids the Existing Order, however, the TCEH
Debtors must satisfy following conditions:

   A. On the Closing date, the TCEH Debtors are authorized and
directed to:

       (a) use the proceeds of borrowings under the DIP Facility to
irrevocably repay in full all obligations (other than any
indemnities that intended to survive repayment of the obligations
under the Existing DIP Credit Agreement) then due and payable to
the Existing DIP Agent and the Existing DIP Lenders under the
Existing DIP Facility Documents and the Existing DIP Order.

       (b) cancel, replace, backstop or "cash collaterize" all
outstanding letters of credit issued pursuant to the Existing DIP
Credit Agreement in accordance with the provisions thereof.

       (c) pay or secure all hedging obligations of the TCEH
Debtors permitted under the Existing DIP Credit Agreement, in each
case under collateral arrangements reasonably satisfactory to the
respective obligee of such obligations, whereupon all liens,
mortgages and security interests granted to the Existing DIP Agent
and the Existing DIP Lenders under the Existing DIP Order and the
Existing DIP Facility Documents shall be deemed released and of no
further force or effect.

   B. Subsequent to the Closing Date. The TCEH Debtors will
promptly pay and/or reimburse the Existing DIP Agent and/or
Existing DIP Lenders for any and all reasonable fees, costs,
expenses, losses and damages incurred thereafter to the extent that
the Existing DIP Credit Agreement or any other Existing DIP
Facility Document entitled them to such payment, indemnity or
reimbursement after termination of such Existing DIP Facility
Document and such amounts shall, until paid in full in cash,
constitute superpriority administrative expense claims, senior in
all respects to the DIP Superpriority Claims.

A full-text copy of the Amended Final DIP Order dated June 28, 2016
is available at https://is.gd/YEJtT8

            About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a Portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.

Oncor, an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the
largest regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth. EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS). The Debtors are seeking to have their cases jointly
administered for procedural purposes.

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion. The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal. The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor, and
Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring agreement
are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as legal
advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor. The EFH
equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is represented by
Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq. An Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors has been appointed in the case. The Committee represents
the interests of the unsecured creditors of only of Energy Future
Competitive Holdings Company LLC; EFCH's direct subsidiary, Texas
Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC; and EFH Corporate
Services Company, and of no other debtors. The Committee has
selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and Polsinelli PC for
representation in this high-profile energy restructuring. The
lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck, Esq., Brett H.
Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at Morrison & Foerster
LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K. Edelson, Esq., Shanti
M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at Polsinelli PC.

                     *     *     *

In December 2015, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Debtors' Sixth
Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization.  In May 2016, certain first
lien creditors of TCEH delivered a Plan Support Termination Notice
to the Debtors and the other parties to the Plan Support Agreement,
notifying the parties of the occurrence of a Plan Support
Termination Event. The delivery of the Plan Support Termination
Notice caused the Confirmed Plan to become null and void.

Following the occurrence of the Plan Support Termination Event as
well as the termination of a roughly $20 billion deal to sell the
Debtors' stake in Oncor Electric Delivery Co., the Debtors filed
the Plan of Reorganization and the Disclosure Statement with the
Bankruptcy Court on May 1, 2016. On May 11, they filed an amended
joint plan of reorganization and a related disclosure statement.

In June 2016, Judge Sontchi approved the disclosure statement
explaining Energy Future Holdings Corp., et al.'s second amended
joint plan of reorganization of the TCEH Debtors and the EFH Shared
Services Debtors, and scheduled the hearing to confirm the Plan to
begin at 10:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) on August 17, 2016.


ESML HOLDING: Meeting to Form Creditors' Panel Set for July 19
--------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on July 19, 2016, at 10:00 p.m. in the
bankruptcy case of ESML Holdings Inc.

The meeting will be held at:

         J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
         844 King Street, Suite 2112
          Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it represents.


FILMED ENTERTAINMENT: Can Access Cash Until Plan Effective Date
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Shelley C. Chapman of the Sourthern District of New York
issued an amended order authorizing Filmed Entertainment Inc. to
use cash collateral, which automatically terminates on the earlier
of the occurrence of any of the termination event or the effective
date of the Plan.

During the period of the Debtor's authority to use Cash Collateral,
the Debtor is directed to provide the Secured Party and the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors with its  rolling updated
4-week cash flow forecast and budget within five business days
following the end of each week.

In addition, the Court ordered that the Secured Party is entitled
to: (a) Superpriority Claims, (b) Adequate Protection Payment of
$150,000 to be made within three (3) business days from the entry
of the Amended Final Order, (c) Adequate Protection Liens:
Replacement Lien and Lien on Unencumbered Property, and (d) Liens
Senior to Other Liens, until the indefeasible repayment of amounts
owed under the Settlement Agreement.

The Troubled Company Reporter has reported on June 28, 2016, that
Judge Shelley C. Chapman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York has extended, at the behest of the
Debtor, the exclusive period for the Debtor to solicit acceptance
of the Chapter 11 plan by 30 days, through and including July 6,
2016.

A full-text copy of the Amended Final Cash Collateral Order dated
June 24, 2016, with Budget, is available at https://is.gd/JN5beE

               About Filmed Entertainment

Filmed Entertainment Inc. owned and operated the "Columbia House
DVD Club," a direct-to-customer distributor of movies and
television series in the United States.  FEI conducts its business
through physical catalogues and through the --
http://www.columbiahouse.com/Web site.  FEI was historically
active in the musical compact disc business, but exited the music
business in 2010.  Founded in 1955 as a division of CBS Inc. to
sell vinyl records and cassette tapes, FEI is a unit of Pride Tree
Holdings, Inc., which acquired FEI in December 2012.

On Aug. 10, 2015 FEI filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 15-12244) in Manhattan, New York.  The case is pending
before the Honorable Shelley C. Chapman.

The Debtor tapped Griffin Hamersky P.C. as counsel and Prime Clerk
LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and debt
of $50 million to $100 million.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed five creditors of Filmed
Entertainment to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.  The Committee is represented by Lowenstein Sandler LLP.


FRAC SPECIALISTS: Unsec. Creditors' Bid for Trustee Okayed
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mark X. Mullin entered an agreed order granting the motion of
the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee for Frac Specialists,
LLC, et al., seeking appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee in the
Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.

"The Motion filed by the Committee is GRANTED, and a trustee shall
be appointed under section 1104(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.  The
motion filed by the United States Trustee, is DENIED as moot,"
according to the Order.

The Order was agreed to in form and substance by attorneys for the
Creditors Committee, the Debtors and the U.S. Trustee.

According to the Agreed Order, Cary Grossman will continue to serve
as CRO for the Debtors until the chapter 11 trustee's appointment
has been approved by a final order of the Court. Following the
appointment of the trustee, consistent with the terms of the orders
approving the retention of Mr. Grossman as CRO, Mr. Grossman may
file a final fee application for his time prior to the trustee's
appointment and for any additional time spent following the
trustee's appointment to assist in the transition of the Debtors'
businesses to the trustee.  The Court and all parties in interest
reserve all rights with respect to any fees or expenses requested
by Mr. Grossman.

                         Grossman as CRO

On Feb. 3, 2016, the Committee filed its initial motion to appoint
a chapter 11 trustee (the "Original Motion"), but has abated the
Original Motion in light of the Debtors' agreement to employ Cary
Grossman of Shoreline Capital as the Debtors' chief restructuring
officer ("CRO"). The CRO's Role Was Limited.

Shortly after the Committee filed the Original Motion, the
Committee filed a joint motion with the Debtor to employ Mr.
Grossman as CRO.  The parties discussed Mr. Grossman's retention
with the UST, and, following a hearing, the Court approved Mr.
Grossman's retention without objection on February 17, 2016.5 Mr.
Grossman's retention has been extended several times, all without
objection from the UST.

Mr. Grossman's engagement agreement with the Debtors made clear
that he was being retained to reduce costs and find a viable
alternative for the Debtors' reorganization.  Paragraph 1(b)(iv)
of
his engagement agreement specifically provides that "nothing
herein
shall be deemed to authorize the CRO to initiate any receivership,
plan of liquidation, Chapter 11 proceeding under the Bankruptcy
Code or similar proceeding without the prior consent or approval
of
the Board of Directors . . . ."  The Committee believes that
orderly liquidation of businesses goes beyond Mr. Grossman's
expertise, and most certainly lies beyond the scope of what Mr.
Grossman was retained to do.

                        Sale or Liquidation

Now that Mr. Grossman has stabilized the Debtors' operations, the
Debtors have been marketed for sale, either as a going concern or
as a liquidation.  Thus far, only one bid has been offered by Mr.
Grossman.  Mr. Grossman has proposed to acquire the Debtors, in
part, under a reorganization plan that would pay creditors over
time.  The proposal purports to offer creditors a greater
aggregate
recovery than Mr. Grossman believes creditors would receive in a
liquidation.  No competing bids have been made to the Debtors
through their investment advisor, SSG, to date.  While the bid
procedures allow for bids to be made through July 15, 2016, it
does
not appear from the communications received to date that there
will
be any serious "going concern" offers.

Mr. Grossman's bid may be the highest and best "going concern"
offer available to the estates, and the Committee invites him to
continue his efforts to maximize value for the estates.
Unfortunately, the Committee does not believe that the current
proposal is likely to gain the necessary support from creditors to
achieve confirmation.  Thus, it is in the best interest of the
estates to pivot toward liquidation -- which is beyond the scope
of
Mr. Grossman's role as CRO.

Accordingly, the Committee believes a chapter 11 trustee can take
over the Debtors' businesses and guide them toward a plan, which
can incorporate a bid made under the current bid procedures, or
establish a liquidating trust or entity to allow the Debtors'
business or assets to be sold under a plan.

Counsel to the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee:

         Mark E. Andrews, Esq.
         Aaron M. Kaufman, Esq.
         DYKEMA COX SMITH
         1717 Main Street, Suite 4200
         Dallas, TX 75201
         Tel: (214) 698-7800
         Fax: (214) 698-7899
         E-mail: mandrews@dykema.com
                 akaufman@dykema.com

                      About Frac Specialists

Frac Specialists, LLC, Cement Specialists, LLC, and Acid
Specialists, LLC, are oilfield service providers serving the
exploration and production industry within the Permian Basin.
Noble Natural Resources, LLC, Javier Urias and Alex Hinojos
collectively own 100% of the membership interests in the
Companies.

The Companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Lead Case No. 15-41974), on May 17, 2015.  Larry P. Noble
signed the petitions as manager.  

On May 27, 2015, the Court directed the joint administration of the
cases.  The Debtors disclosed $61,675,313 in assets and $57,982,488
in liabilities.

Judge Michael Lynn presides over the cases.  The Debtors tapped
Lynda L. Lankford, Esq., and Jeff P. Prostok, Esq., at Forshey &
Prostok, LLP, as their counsel.  The Debtors hired CBRE, Inc., as
their real estate appraiser.

The U.S. Trustee appointed five creditors to serve on an official
committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee is represented by
Mark E. Andrews, Esq., and Aaron M. Kaufman, Esq., at Dykema Cox
Smith.


GENERAL MOTORS: Lenders' Suit vs Mayer Brown Dismissed
------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert W. Gettleman of the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division granted the
defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice the case captioned
OAKLAND POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, THE CITY OF OAKLAND, AND
THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, v. MAYER BROWN, LLP, Defendant, Case No. 15 C 6742
(N.D. Ill.).

The two-count putative class action consolidated complaint against
Mayer Brown, LLP for negligent misrepresentation (Count I) and
legal malpractice (Count II) was filed by the Oakland Police and
Fire Retirement System, the City of Oakland, and the Employees'
Retirement System of the City of Montgomery.

In 2001, General Motors entered into a secured financing
arrangement (the "Synthetic Lease") in which it obtained
approximately $300 million in financing from a syndicate of
lenders. Pursuant to the arrangement, GM sold twelve of its real
estate properties to the syndicate of lenders and then leased those
properties back from the lenders. Accordingly, the Synthetic Lease
was "essentially a loan by the lender syndicate to General Motors,
secured by the specific real estate properties owned by General
Motors."

GM's obligation to repay the Synthetic Lease was secured by liens
on the real estate property. The security interests on the
properties were perfected by UCC-1 financing statements filed in
the various counties in which the properties were located. These
security interests were also recorded in UCC-1 statements filed
with the Delaware Department of State. JPMorgan Chase Bank
("JPMorgan") was a "significant lender participant in the Synthetic
Lease," and also acted as the administrative agent for the
Synthetic Lease. Defendant law firm represented GM in connection
with the negotiation, documentation, and consummation of the
lease.

In 2006, GM borrowed $1.5 billion (the "Term Loan") from a
different syndicate of lenders. Plaintiffs and the putative class
members -- more than 400 entities -- participated in the Term Loan
syndication. "The security interest in substantially all of the
collateral for the Term Loan was recorded in a UCC-1 financing
statement filed in 2006 with the Delaware Department of State." The
security interest for the loan was held by JPMorgan as
administrative agent for the Term Loan. "The Term Loan and the
Synthetic Lease were completely unrelated to each other and were
secured by completely different properties of General Motors."

A full-text copy of Judge Gettleman's June 22, 2016 memorandum
opinion and order is available at https://is.gd/MN0c6k from
Leagle.com.

Oakland Police and Fire Retirement System is represented by:

          Donald Lewis Sawyer, Esq.
          Robert J. Wozniak, Esq.
          Michael Jerry Freed, Esq.
          FREED KANNER LONDON & MILLEN LLC
          2201 Waukegan Road, Suite 130
          Bannockburn, IL 60015
          Tel: (224)632-4500
          Fax: (224)632-4521
          Email: dsawyer@fklmlaw.com
                 rwozniak@fklmlaw.com
                 mfreed@fklmlaw.com

            -- and --

          Kathryn Y. Schubert, Esq.
          Noah M. Schubert, Esq.
          Robert C. Schubert, Esq.
          Willem F. Jonckheer, Esq.
          SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
          Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Tel: (415)788-4220
          Fax: (415)788-0161

The Employees' Retirement System of the City of Montgomery is
represented by:

          Edward F. Haber, Esq.
          SHAPIRO HABER & URMY LLP
          Seaport East
          Two Seaport Lane
          Boston, MA 02210
          Tel: (617)439-3939
          Fax: (617)439-0134
          Email: ehaber@shulaw.com

            -- and --

          Robert C. Schubert, Esq.
          SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
          Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Tel: (415)788-4220
          Fax: (415)788-0161

City of Oakland is represented by:

          Robert C. Schubert, Esq.
          SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
          Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Tel: (415)788-4220
          Fax: (415)788-0161

Mayer Brown LLP is represented by:

          Stephen Novack, Esq.
          Amanda M.H. Wolfman, Esq.
          Andrew P. Shelby, Esq.
          Timothy John Miller, Esq.
          NOVACK AND MACEY LLP
          100 North Riverside Plaza
          Chicago, IL 60606-1501
          Tel: (312)419-6900
          Fax: (312)419-6928
          Email: snovack@novackmacey.com

Service List is represented by:

          Michael Jerry Freed, Esq.
          FREED KANNER LONDON & MILLEN LLC
          2201 Waukegan Road, Suite 130
          Bannockburn, IL 60015
          Tel: (224)632-4500
          Fax: (224)632-4521
          Email: mfreed@fklmlaw.com

                    About General Motors

With its global headquarters in Detroit, Michigan, General Motors
-- http://www.gm.com/-- is one of the world's largest automakers,


traces its roots back to 1908.

General Motors Co. was formed to acquire the operations of
General Motors Corp. through a sale under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 363
following Old GM's bankruptcy filing.  The U.S. government
provided financing.  The deal was closed July 10, 2009, and Old GM
changed its name to Motors Liquidation Co.

Old GM -- General Motors Corporation -- filed for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 09-50026) on June 1,
2009.  The Honorable Robert E. Gerber presides over the
Chapter 11 cases.  The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Jenner & Block LLP and Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP as
counsel; and Morgan Stanley, Evercore Partners and the Blackstone
Group LLP as financial advisor.  Garden City Group is the claims
and notice agent of the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors and a separate Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors Holding Asbestos-Related Claims.  Lawyers at Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP served as bankruptcy counsel to the
Creditors Committee.  Attorneys at Butzel Long served as counsel
on supplier contract matters.  FTI Consulting Inc. served as
financial advisors to the Creditors Committee.  Elihu Inselbuch,
Esq., at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, represented the Asbestos
Committee.  Legal Analysis Systems, Inc., served as asbestos
valuation analyst.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Debtors'
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan on March 29, 2011.  The Plan
was declared effect on March 31.

On Dec. 15, 2011, Motors Liquidation was dissolved.  On the
Dissolution Date, pursuant to the Plan and the Motors Liquidation
Company GUC Trust Agreement, dated March 30, 2011, between the
parties thereto, the trust administrator and trustee
-- GUC Trust Administrator -- of the Motors Liquidation Company
GUC Trust, assumed responsibility for the affairs of and certain
claims against MLC and its debtor subsidiaries that were not
concluded prior to the Dissolution Date.

                         *     *     *

The Troubled Company Reporter, on Aug. 29, 2014, reported that
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) of
General Motors Company (GM) and its General Motors Holdings LLC
(GM Holdings) subsidiary at 'BB+'.  In addition, Fitch has
affirmed GM Holdings' secured revolving credit facility rating at
'BBB-' and GM's senior unsecured notes rating at 'BB+'.  The
Rating Outlook for GM and GM Holdings is Positive.


GENERAL PRODUCTS: U.S. Trustee Forms 5-Member Committee
-------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on July 12 appointed five creditors
of General Products Corporation to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors.

The committee members are:

    (1) RCM Industries, Inc.
        Attn: Vernon Reizman
        3021 Cullerton Drive
        Franklin Park, IL 60131
        Tel: (847) 455-1950, ext. 150
        Fax: (847) 455-1966
        E-mail: vreizman@rcmindustries.com

    (2) Bremen Castings, Inc.
        Attn: Chris Seanor
        500 N. Baltimore Street
        Bremen, IN 46506
        Tel: (574) 546-2411, Ext. 210
        E-mail: cseanor@bcimail.com

    (3) Haggard & Stocking Associates, Inc.
        Attn: Paul Mills
        P.O. Box 240
        Beech Grove, IL 46107
        Tel: (317) 788-4661
        Fax: (317) 781-3282
        E-mail: pmills@haggard-stocking.com

    (4) General Aluminum Mfg. Co.
        Attn: Robert P. Vilsack
        6065 Parkland Boulevard
        Cleveland, OH 44124
        Tel: (440) 947-2203
        Fax: (440) 947-2209
        E-mail: Bob.Vilsack@PKOH.COM

    (5) Great Lakes Die Cast Corporation
        Attn: William J. Beck
        701 W. Laketon Avenue
        Muskegon, MI 49441
        Tel: (231) 726-4002
        Fax: (231) 726-3207
        E-mail: mmiller@gldiecast.com

                     About General Products

General Products Corporation and General Products Mexico, LLC, both
based in Livonia, MI, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
Mich. Case Nos. 16-49267 and 16-49269) on June 27, 2016. The Hon.
Thomas J. Tucker (16-49267) and Walter Shapero (16-49269) preside
over the case. Rachel L. Hillegonds, Esq. and John T. Piggins,
Esq., at Miller Johnson, as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, General Products Corporation estimated $50 million
to $50 million in both assets and liabilities. General Products
Mexico estimated $50,000 to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. The petition was signed by Andrew Masullo, president
and chief executive officer.


HAMPSHIRE GROUP: To Transition Dockers Licenses Back to Levi
------------------------------------------------------------
Hampshire Group, Limited announced that the Company has reached an
agreement with its primary licensor, Levi Strauss & Co., and its
senior secured lender with respect to its licenses to produce
Dockers brand clothing.  Hampshire will transition the Dockers
licenses back to Levi Strauss & Co. along with related product
development, production processes and sourcing relationships, and
liquidate its receivables and other assets with the goal of paying
off its outstanding indebtedness with its lender.  The lender
agreed to fund the Company's completion of identified purchase
orders.  The Company expects the transition process to be completed
by early October 2016.

The Company anticipates entering into a separate agreement with its
secured lender to fund certain other aspects of the Company's
operations during the transition period.

Hampshire continues to explore various alternatives for its James
Campbell brand, including its continued operation or a
divestiture.

Management plans to provide further updates on its plan for the
James Campbell brand as new information becomes available.

                     About Hampshire Group

New York-based Hampshire Group, Limited (OTC Markets: HAMP) is a
provider of fashion apparel across a broad range of product
categories, channels of distribution and price points.  As a
holding company, the Company operates through its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Hampshire Brands, Inc. and Hampshire International,
LLC.  The Company completed the sale of Rio Garment S.A. effective
April 10, 2015.

The Company incurred a net loss of $28.8 million in 2014 following
a net loss of $16.04 million in 2013.

As of Sept. 26, 2015, Hampshire had $37.9 million in total assets,
$44.8 million in total liabilities and a $6.93 million total
stockholders' deficit.

Elliott Davis Decosimo LLC, in Greenville, South Carolina, issued a
"going concern" qualification on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses and incurred negative cash
flows from continuing operations and its total liabilities exceed
its total assets at December 31, 2014.  In addition, the Company is
in default under its credit facility and has entered into a
forbearance agreement and amendment to the credit facility, which
among other items, changed the maturity date of the credit facility
to February 29, 2016.  The Company's lenders have indicated that
they will not renew the credit facility beyond that maturity date,
because they intend to exit this line of business. The Company is
in the process of attempting to obtain financing with a new lender.
These conditions, the auditors said, raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


HAROLD ROSBOTTOM: Summary Judgment for Schiff, Fox Reversed
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Elizabeth Erny Foote of the United States District Court for
the Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport Division, reversed
the bankruptcy court's summary judgment but affirmed its denial of
the 12(b)(7) dismissal of the case captioned HAROLD ROSBOTTOM, JR.,
v. GERALD SCHIFF AND LESLIE FOX,  Civil Action No. 15-758 (W.D.
La.).

The appeal of the two rulings in the bankruptcy adversary
proceeding was filed by the debtor and defendant, Harold Rosbottom
Jr.  The plaintiffs in the adversary proceeding, bankruptcy trustee
Gerald Schiff and Rosbottom's former spouse, Leslie Fox, sought a
declaration that a condominium held in trust is part of Rosbottom's
bankruptcy estate because the trust was not validly formed and
therefore never existed.  The bankruptcy court granted the
plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and denied Rosbottom's
12(b)(7) motion to dismiss.

The case was remanded for further proceedings.

A full-text copy of Judge Foote's June 28, 2016 memorandum ruling
is available at https://is.gd/yXnYtK from Leagle.com.

Gerald H Schiff is represented by:

          Louis M. Phillips, Esq.
          KELLY HART PITRE
          400 Poydras Street, Suite 1812
          New Orleans, LA 70130
          Tel: (504)522-1812
          Fax: (504)522-1813
          Email: louis.phillips@kellyhart.com

Leslie B Fox is represented by:

          Roger Joseph Naus, Esq.
          WIENER WEISS & MADISON
          333 Texas St #2350
          Shreveport, LA 71101
          Tel: (318)226-9100
          Fax: (318)424-5128
          Email: rjnaus@wwmlaw.com

            -- and --

          David S. Rubin, Esq.
          KANTROW SPAHT ET AL.
          445 North Blvd., Suite 300
          Baton Rouge, LA 70802-5747
          Tel: (225)383-4703
          Fax: (225)343-0630
          Email: david@kswb.com


HECK INDUSTRIES: Southern Aggregates  Replaces Savard in Panel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Henry G. Hobbs, Jr., Acting United States Trustee for Region 5,
informs the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of
Louisiana that the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Heck Industries, Inc., is
reconstituted due to the withdrawal of Savard Labor & Marine, Inc.,
from the committee and the addition of Southern Aggregates LLC.

The committee members are:

    (1) Continental Cement Company
        Attn: Mike Gordon
        16100 Swingley Ridge Road
        Suite 230
        Chesterfield, MO 63017

    (2) Holcim (US) Inc.
        Attn: Mr. Roy D. Dodd
        4511 Bogan Trail
        Buford, GA 30519-7403

    (3) Southern Aggregates, LLC
        Attn: Kevin P. Black, VP/GM
        P.O. Box 427
        Watson, LA 70786

                     About Heck Industries

Heck Industries, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D.
La. Case No. 16-10516) on April 29, 2016, in Baton Rouge,
Louisiana.  Hon. Douglas D. Dodd is the case judge.  William E.
Steffes, Esq., Noel Steffes Melancon, Esq., and Barbara B.
Parsons,
Esq., at Steffes, Vingiello & McKenzie, L.L.C., serve as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtor is the owner of a concrete supply business which has
operated throughout Louisiana since 1957.  The Debtor's chapter 11
case was precipitated by a severe strain on collection of its
accounts receivable due to, among other things, unfortunate
weather
conditions hampering the Debtor's ability to complete numerous
jobs
awarded to it.

The Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and debt.


HOLLY ENERGY: S&P Assigns 'BB' Rating on Proposed $300MM Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' issue-level rating to Holly
Energy Partners L.P. and Holly Energy Finance Corp.'s proposed $300
million senior unsecured notes offering due 2024.  The recovery
rating on the notes is '5', indicating expectations of a modest
(10% to 30%; lower half of the range) recovery in the event of a
payment default.  The partnership intends to use the net proceeds
to partly repay amounts outstanding under its revolving credit
facility, which had $765 million drawn as of March 31, 2016.

Dallas-based Holly Energy Partners is a crude oil and refined
products logistics provider that operates petroleum product and
crude pipelines, storage tanks, terminals, and loading rack
facilities in the mid-continent region.  The corporate credit
rating is 'BB+' and the outlook is stable.

RATINGS LIST

Holly Energy Partners L.P.
Corporate credit rating                          BB+/Stable/--

New Rating

Holly Energy Finance Corp.
Holly Energy Partners L.P.
$300 mil. senior unsecured notes due 2024        BB
Recovery rating                                 5L


HUB INTERNATIONAL: S&P Raises Rating on Sr. Facilities to 'B+'
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it raised its issue rating on HUB
International Ltd.'s senior secured facilities (comprising a $1.95
billion term loan due October 2020, a $225 million revolver due
October 2018, and a C$50 million revolver due October 2018) to 'B+'
from 'B' and revised its recovery rating on the debt facilities to
'2' from '3'.

"The '2' recovery rating indicates our belief that lenders could
expect substantial (70% to 90%) recovery in the event of a payment
default.  Our recovery expectations are in the lower half of the
70% to 90% range.  We revised the recovery rating following a
reassessment of our estimated emergence valuation in light of the
strong EBITDA growth characteristics the company has exhibited
since the inception of the loans.  More specifically, we expect
EBITDA (per our calculations) to exceed $600 million by year-end
2017 compared with less than $400 as of year-end 2013.  We expect
this to be achieved through a combination of robust (acquisition
supported) revenue growth and stable margins.  Our 'CCC+' senior
unsecured debt rating and '6' recovery ratings remain unchanged,"
S&P said.

S&P's 'B' long-term corporate credit rating on the company remains
unchanged, supported by its fair business risk profile and highly
leveraged financial risk profile.  The outlook is stable.

RATINGS LIST

HUB International Ltd.
Counterparty Credit Rating        B/Stable/--

Upgraded                           To               From
HUB International Ltd.
Senior Secured Debt               B+               B
  Recovery Rating                  2L               3H


IAN RAJIV SAHAI: Chichester Proposes Trustee or Conversion
----------------------------------------------------------
Esther Chichester on Aug. 10, 2016, at 2:30 p.m., will appear
before Judge Nancy Hersey Lord for her motion to appoint a Chapter
11 trustee in the Chapter 11 case of Ian Rajiv Sahai, or
alternatively, to convert the Debtor's case to one under Chapter 7
of the Bankruptcy Code.  Objections are due Aug. 3, 2016.

On Sept. 21, 2006, Chichester suffered an injury at the property
located at 111-09 Liberty Avenue, Queens, New York, which was then
owned by the Debtor and his sister Amy Sahai.  The property at
which Chichester suffered the injury was not insured.  Chichester
thereafter commenced an action against a tenant of the subject
property as well as Ian and Amy for damages sustained as a result
of her injuries.  A judgment in Chichester's favor and against Ian
and Amy was entered on July 1, 2010, in the amount of $1,365,781.
As of the Petition Date, Chichester was owed $2,119,093 in
connection with the judgment.

"[G]round exists under both Sections 1104(a)(1) and 1104(a)(2) of
the Bankruptcy Code to appoint an operating trustee.  Here, there
are multiple existences of prepetition fraudulent conveyances, all
of which were to insiders and all of which involve self-dealing.
The Debtor systematically transferred 11 New York properties and 3
Florida properties at a critical juncture in the personal injury
action to hinder Chichester's satisfaction of a substantial
judgment against the Debtor and his properties.  Those transfers
were all made with a lack of consideration," Matthew G. Roseman,
Esq., at Cullen and Dykman LLP, avers.

"The Debtor has no ability to emerge from Chapter11 without a sale
of his properties.  As set forth in his schedules, the properties
are valued, collectively, at $5,396,255 (which does not include the
value of129-19 95th Avenue, nor the value of any properties he may
own in Florida).  His secured claims other than Chichester's total
$1,920,509 and unsecured claims total $53,345.  Thus, with
Chichester's claim, his total debts are $4,092,946.  As a result,
the Debtor will need to pay creditors in full.  Since the Debtor's
net income amounts to only $110,000 annually (which is decreasing
because of an alleged disability according to the Debtor), it would
take him more than 37 years at the very least to satisfy his
obligations without the sale of his properties. A sale is the only
option."

"The sale of the properties, however, will be a complicated
endeavor since there are various layers of debt with Chichester's
judgment intertwined among the layers.  That process needs to be
pursued by a sophisticated trustee with sophisticated advisors, and
one who will put the estate's interest first.  The Debtor in no way
fits that description."

Counsel for Esther Chichester:

         Matthew G. Roseman, Esq.
         Bonnie L. Pollack, Esq.
         Jocelyn Lupetin, Esq.
         CULLEN AND DYKMAN LLP
         100 Quentin Roosevelt Boulevard
         Garden City, NY 11530
         Tel: (516) 357-3700

Ian Rajiv Sahai filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case
No. 16-42485) on June 6, 2016.  Brian McCaffrey, Esq., at Brian
McCaffrey, P.C., serves as counsel.  To date, no trustee, examiner
or creditors' committee has been appointed in the Debtor's case.


INTERVENTION ENERGY: Hires DLA Piper as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------
Intervention Energy Holdings, LLC and its debtor-affiliates seek
authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ DLA Piper LLP (US) as counsel, nunc pro tunc to
the May 20, 2016 petition date.

The Debtors require DLA Piper to provide these services:

   (a) advising the Debtors of their rights, powers and duties as
       debtors and debtors in possession while operating and
       managing their respective businesses and properties under
       chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code;

   (b) preparing on behalf of the Debtors all necessary and
       appropriate applications, motions, proposed orders, other
       pleadings, notices, schedules and other documents, and
       reviewing all financial and other reports to be filed in
       these Chapter 11 Cases;

   (c) advising the Debtors concerning, and preparing responses
       to, applications, motions, other pleadings, notices and
       other papers that may be filed by other parties in these
       Chapter 11 Cases;

   (d) advising the Debtors with respect to, and assisting in the
       negotiation and documentation of, financing agreements and
       related transactions;

   (e) reviewing the nature and validity of any liens asserted
       against the Debtors' property and advising the Debtors
       concerning the enforceability of such liens;

   (f) advising the Debtors regarding their ability to initiate
       actions to collect and recover property for the benefit of
       their estates;

   (g) advising and assisting the Debtors in connection with any
       potential property dispositions;

   (h) advising the Debtors concerning executory contract and
       unexpired lease assumptions, assignments and rejections;

   (i) advising the Debtors in connection with the formulation,
       negotiation and promulgation of a plan or plans of
       reorganization, and related transactional documents;

   (j) assisting the Debtors in reviewing, estimating and
       resolving claims asserted against the Debtors' estates;

   (k) commencing and conducting litigation necessary and
       appropriate to assert rights held by the Debtors, protect
       assets of the Debtors' chapter 11 estates or otherwise
       further the goal of completing the Debtors' successful
       reorganization; and

   (l) providing non-bankruptcy services for the Debtors to the
       extent requested by the Debtors.

DLA Piper will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Thomas R. Califano, Partner   $995
       Stuart M. Brown, Partner      $920
       Dienna Corrado, Associate     $820
       Carolyn B. Fox, Paralegal     $265

DLA Piper will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Thomas R. Califano, partner of DLA Piper, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

DLA Piper provided the response to the request for additional
information set forth in Paragraph D.1. of the Revised UST
Guidelines:

   -- The hourly rates set forth in this Declaration are
      consistent with the rates that DLA Piper charges other
      comparable chapter 11 clients, and the rate structure
      provided by DLA Piper is appropriate and is not
      significantly different from (a) the rates that DLA Piper
      charges in other non-bankruptcy representations or (b) the
      rates of other comparably skilled professionals for similar
      engagements.

   -- DLA Piper represented the client in the 12 months
      prepetition. During this time, DLA Piper charged the
      Debtors its standard rates. The material financial terms for
      the prepetition engagement remained the same, as the
      engagement was on an hourly basis.

   -- The Debtors and DLA Piper expect to develop a prospective
      budget and staffing plan, recognizing that in the course of
      large chapter 11 cases, unforeseeable fees and expenses that
      will need to be addressed by the Debtors and DLA Piper may
      arise.

The Bankruptcy Court will hold a hearing on the motion on July 26,
2016, at 10:00 a.m.  Objections, if any, were due July 13, 2016, at
4:00 p.m.

DLA Piper can be reached at:

       Stuart M. Brown, Esq.
       DLA PIPER LLP (US)
       1201 North Market Street, Suite 2100
       Wilmington, DE 19801
       Tel: (302) 468-5700
       Fax: (302) 394-2341
       E-mail: Stuart.Brown@dlapiper.com

              - and -

       Thomas R. Califano, Esq.
       Dienna Corrado, Esq.
       DLA PIPER LLP (US)
       1251 Avenue of the Americas
       New York, NY 10020
       Tel: (212) 335-4500
       Fax: (212) 335-4501
       E-mail: Thomas.Califano@dlapiper.com
               Dienna.Corrado@dlapiper.com

                  About Intervention Energy

Intervention Energy Holdings, LLC and Intervention Energy, LLC
filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
16-11247) on May 20, 2016.  The petition was signed by John R.
Zimmerman, president.  The Hon Kevin J. Carey presides over the
case.

The Debtor estimated assets and debt of $100 million to $500
million.

The Debtor tapped DLA Piper LLP (US) as counsel, and Rust
Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy, as claims and noticing agent.


INTERVENTION ENERGY: Hires PJT Partners as Investment Banker
------------------------------------------------------------
Intervention Energy Holdings, LLC and its debtor-affiliates seek
authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ PJT Partners LP as investment banker, nunc pro
tunc to the May 20, 2016 petition date.

The Debtors require PJT Partners to:

   (a) assist in the evaluation of the Company's businesses and
       prospects;

   (b) assist in the development of the Company's long-term
       business plan and related financial projections;

   (c) assist in the development of financial data and
       presentations to the Company's Board of Directors, various
       creditors and other third parties;

   (d) analyze the Company's financial liquidity and evaluate
       alternatives to improve such liquidity;

   (e) analyze various restructuring scenarios and the potential
       impact of these scenarios on the recoveries of those
       stakeholders impacted by the Restructuring;

   (f) provide strategic advice with regard to restructuring or
       refinancing the Company's Obligations;

   (g) evaluate the Company's debt capacity and alternative
       capital structures;

   (h) participate in negotiations among the Company and its
       creditors, suppliers, lessors and other interested parties;

   (i) value securities offered by the Company in connection with
       a Restructuring;

   (j) advise the Company and negotiate with lenders with respect
       to potential waivers or amendments of various credit
       facilities;

   (k) assist in arranging financing for the Company, as
       requested;

   (l) provide expert witness testimony concerning any of the
       subjects encompassed by the other investment banking
       services;

   (m) assist the Company in preparing marketing materials in
       conjunction with a possible Transaction;

   (n) assist the Company in identifying potential buyers or
       parties in interest to a Transaction and assist in the due
       diligence process;

   (o) assist and advise the Company concerning the terms,
       conditions and impact of any proposed Transaction; and

   (p) provide such other advisory services as are customarily
       provided in connection with the analysis and negotiation of

       a Restructuring or a Transaction, as requested and mutually

       agreed.

The Debtors and PJT have agreed that PJT shall, in respect of its
services, be compensated under the following fee structure:

   -- a monthly advisory fee in the amount of $150,000, per
      month, in cash, with the first Monthly Fee payable upon the
      execution of the Engagement Letter by both parties and
      additional installments of such Monthly Fee payable in
      advance on each monthly anniversary of the Effective Date;

   -- an additional fee equal to $3,500,000. If the Restructuring
      has not been consummated within six months of the Effective
      Date of the Engagement Agreement, then 50% of the Monthly
      Fees earned thereafter shall be credited towards the
      Restructuring Fee. Except as otherwise provided herein, a
      Restructuring shall be deemed to have been consummated upon
      (a) the binding execution and effectiveness of all necessary

      waivers, consents, amendments or restructuring agreements
      between the Company and its creditors involving the
      compromise of the face amount of such Obligations or the
      conversion of all or part of such Obligations into
      alternative securities, including equity, in the case of an
      out-of-court restructuring; or (b) the confirmation and
      consummation of a Plan of Reorganization pursuant to an
      order of the Bankruptcy Court, in the case of an in-court
      restructuring. The Restructuring Fee will be earned and
      payable upon consummation of the Restructuring.
      Notwithstanding the foregoing, (a) a Restructuring
      specifically shall be deemed to exclude any assumption at
      face value of Obligations in connection with the sale or
      disposition of any subsidiaries, joint ventures, assets or
      lines of business of the Company and (b) the restructured
      Obligations shall exclude any Obligations in respect of
      which a Restructuring Fee has previously been paid; and

   -- reimbursement of all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
      incurred during this engagement, including, but not limited
      to, travel and lodging, direct identifiable data processing,

      document production, publishing services and communication
      charges, courier services, working meals, reasonable fees
      and expenses of PJT Partners' counsel and other necessary
      expenditures, payable upon rendition of invoices setting
      forth in reasonable detail the nature and amount of such
      expenses. In connection therewith the Company shall pay PJT
      Partners on the Effective Date and maintain thereafter a
      $25,000 expense advance for which PJT Partners shall account

      upon termination of the Engagement Letter.

John James O'Connell III, partner in the Restructuring & Special
Situations Group at PJT Partners, assured the Court that the firm
is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

The Bankruptcy Court will hold a hearing on the motion on July 26,
2016, at 10:00 a.m.  Objections, if any, were due July 13, 2016, at
4:00 p.m.

PJT Partners can be reached at:

       John James O'Connell III
       PJT PARTNERS LP
       280 Park Avenue
       New York, NY 10017
       Tel: +1 (212) 364-7170
       E-mail: cuminale@pjtpartners.com

                     About Intervention Energy

Intervention Energy Holdings, LLC and Intervention Energy, LLC
filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
16-11247) on May 20, 2016.  The petition was signed by John R.
Zimmerman, president.  The Hon Kevin J. Carey presides over the
case.

The Debtor estimated assets and debt of $100 million to $500
million.

The Debtor tapped DLA Piper LLP (US) as counsel, and Rust
Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy, as claims and noticing agent.



INTERVENTION ENERGY: Taps Rust Omni as Administrative Agent
-----------------------------------------------------------
Intervention Energy Holdings, LLC and its debtor-affiliates seek
authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy ("Rust Omni") as
administrative agent, nunc pro tunc to the May 20, 2016 petition
date.

Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement, and to the extent requested
by the Debtors, Rust Omni has agreed to perform, among other
services, the following:

   (a) assisting with the preparation and filing of the Debtors'
       schedules of assets and liabilities and statements of
       financial affairs;

   (b) generating and providing claim reports and claim objection
       exhibits;

   (c) managing any rights offering pursuant to a Chapter 11 plan;

   (d) managing the publication of legal notices;

   (e) collecting and tabulating votes in connection with any Plan

       filed by the Debtors and providing ballot reports to the
       Debtors and their professionals;

   (f) generating an official ballot certification and testifying,

       if necessary, in support of the ballot tabulation results;

   (g) managing any distributions made pursuant to a Plan; and

   (h) providing any and all necessary administrative tasks not
       otherwise specifically set forth above as the Debtors or
       its professionals may require in connection with these
       Chapter 11 Cases.

Rust Omni will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Clerical Support          $26.25-$37.50
       Project Specialists       $48.75-$63.75
       Project Supervisors       $63.75-$78.75
       Consultants               $78.75-$105.00
       Technology/Programming    $82.50-$123.75
       Senior Consultants        $121.25-$116.25
       Equity Services           $168.75

Rust Omni will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

The Debtors provided Rust Omni a retainer in the amount of $5,000.
Rust Omni has applied the retainer to all pre-petition invoices,
and Rust Omni seeks to hold any amounts remaining in the retainer
as of the Petition Date during these Chapter 11 Cases as security
for the payment of fees and expenses incurred under the Engagement
Agreement.

Paul H. Deutch, executive managing director of Rust Omni, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

The Bankruptcy Court will hold a hearing on the motion on July 26,
2016, at 10:00 a.m.  Objections, if any, are due July 13, 2016, at
4:00 p.m.

Rust Omni can be reached at:

       Paul H. Deutch
       RUST CONSULTING/OMNI BANKRUPTCY
       1120 Avenue of the Americas, 4th Floor
       New York, NY 10036
       Tel: (212) 302-3580
       Fax: (212) 302-3820

                     About Intervention Energy

Intervention Energy Holdings, LLC and Intervention Energy, LLC
filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
16-11247) on May 20, 2016.  The petition was signed by John R.
Zimmerman, president.  The Hon Kevin J. Carey presides over the
case.

The Debtor estimated assets and debt of $100 million to $500
million.

The Debtor tapped DLA Piper LLP (US) as counsel, and Rust
Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy, as claims and noticing agent.



JESUS CARES PRESCHOOL: Seeks Court Okay to Hire A+ Accounting
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus Cares Preschool and Early Learning Center, Inc. seeks
authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida to employ Akshay Dave, CPA of A+ Accounting and
Tax as accountant, nunc pro tunc to June 21, 2016.

The Debtor requires A+ Accounting to:

   (a) prepare and file tax returns and conduct tax research;

   (b) perform normal accounting and other accounting services as
       required by the Debtor; and

   (c) assist the Debtor in preparing Court ordered reports,
       including the U.S. Trustee Reports and any documents
       necessary for the Debtor's disclosure statement.

An hourly rate of $175 for services rendered by the accountant for
preparation of U.S. Trustee Reports and other bankruptcy Court
documents and hourly rate of $75 for accounting services; a range
of $100-$50 per hour for services rendered by accounting staff; and
reimbursement of out of pocket costs such as computer charges,
copies and postage for the accounting services.

Akshay Dave assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and
their estates.

A+ Accounting can be reached at:

       Akshay Dave, CPA
       A+ ACCOUNTING AND TAX
       4002 McLane Drive
       Tampa, FL 33610
       Tel: (813) 381-3809
       E-mail: tax4002@gmail.com

                   About Jesus Cares Preschool

Jesus Cares Preschool and Early Learning Center, Inc., filed a
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-04943)
on June 8, 2016.  The Debtor is represented by Buddy D. Ford, Esq.


JHB ENTERPRISES: Hires Mateer & Harbert as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
JHB Enterprises LLC dba Backhaus seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to employ Kevin
E. Mangum, Michael A. Paasch, and the firm of Mateer & Harbert,
P.A. as counsel.

The Debtor requires Mateer & Harbert to:

   (a) prosecute and defend any causes of action on behalf of the
       Debtor-in-Possession; prepare, on behalf of the Debtor-in-
       Possession all necessary applications, motions, reports and

       other legal papers;

   (b) assist in the formulation of a Plan of Reorganization and
       preparation of Disclosure Statement;

   (c) provide all other services of a legal nature.

Because of the extensive nature of the services to be rendered, the
Debtor-in-Possession desires to retain the firm under a general
retainer.

The Debtor assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and
their estates.

Mateer & Harbert can be reached at:

       Kevin E. Mangum, Esq.
       Michael A. Paasch, Esq.
       MATEER & HARBERT, P.A.
       225 East Robinson St., Ste 600
       P.O. Box 2854
       Orlando, FL 32802-2854
       Tel: (407) 425-9044
       Fax: (407) 423-2016
       E-mail: kmangum@mateerharbert.com
               mpaasch@mateerharbert.com

JHB Enterprises LLC, d/b/a Backhaus filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-04288) on June 28, 2016.


KALOBIOS PHARMACEUTICALS: Black Horse Files Schedule 13D with SEC
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Black Horse Capital LP disclosed that as of July 11,
2016, it may be deemed to have beneficially owned 872,977 Shares,
Black Horse Capital Master Fund Ltd may be deemed to have
beneficially owned 2,040,463 Shares and Cheval Holdings, Ltd., may
be deemed to have beneficially owned 2,035,318 Shares, constituting
approximately 5.9%, 13.7% and 13.7%, respectively, of the
outstanding Shares.

Black Horse Capital Management LLC, by virtue of its relationships
with Domestic Fund and Cheval may be deemed to have beneficially
owned the 2,908,295 Shares beneficially owned by the Domestic Fund
and Cheval, constituting approximately 19.5% of the outstanding
Shares.

Dale Chappell, by virtue of his relationships with the Domestic
Fund, the Offshore Fund and Cheval may be deemed to have
beneficially owned the 4,948,758 Shares owned by each of the
Domestic Fund, the Offshore Fund and Cheval, constituting
approximately 33.2% of the outstanding Shares.

The aggregate percentage of Shares reported owned by each person is
based upon 14,905,145 Shares outstanding as of July 11, 2016, based
on information provided by the Company.

A total of approximately $7,652,185 was paid to acquire the Shares
reported as beneficially owned by the Reporting Persons.  The funds
used to purchase these securities were obtained from the general
working capital of the Domestic Fund, the Offshore Fund and Cheval
and margin account borrowings made in the ordinary course of
business, although the Reporting Persons cannot determine whether
any funds allocated to purchase such securities were obtained from
any margin account borrowings.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                   https://is.gd/FN5iyP

               About KaloBios Pharmaceuticals

Based in South San Francisco, Calif., KaloBios Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., is a company biopharmaceutical company focused on the
development of monoclonal antibody therapeutics.

KaloBios Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: KBIO) on Dec. 29, 2015, filed a
voluntary petition for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.  The filing was
made in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
(Case No. 15-12628).

The Company was represented by Eric D. Schwartz of Morris,
Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell.

Six months after its bankruptcy filing, KaloBios emerged from
Chapter 11 bankruptcy and has also acquired the rights from Savant
Neglected Diseases LLC to develop benznidazole for the treatment
of Chagas disease.


MARCLAY EMS: Seeks to Hire Marc Valentine on Tax Matters
--------------------------------------------------------
Marclay EMS, Inc. asks for permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to employ the
services of special counsel/certified public accountant, Marc T.
Valentine, of Marc T. Valentine, Attorney at Law in Somerset, PA,
to assist with accounting needs.

The Debtor requires Mr. Valentine to provide the following
services:

   (a) preparation of pre-petition tax returns;
  
   (b) legal work/advice related to pre-petition tax debt; and

   (c) future accounting work and legal advice/work as becomes
       necessary.

The attorney/accountant is requesting to be paid an hourly rate of
$150 per hour for legal work, $80 per hour for Certified Public
Accountant work and $30 per hour for secretary.

Mr. Valentine will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Mr. Valentine assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and
their estates.

The Bankruptcy Court will hold a hearing on the application on July
26, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.  Objections, if any, are due July 18.

Mr. Valentine can be reached at:

       Marc. T. Valentine
       124 North Center Avenue, Ste. 230
       Somerset, PA 15501
       Tel: (814) 701-2835

Marclay EMS, Inc., successor to Marclay Community Ambulance Inc.,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-21671) on May 2, 2016.  The Debtor is
represented by Daniel R. White, Esq., at Zebley Mehalov & White,
P.C.


MARICOPA RESOURCES: Case Converted to Chapter 11; Trustee Named
---------------------------------------------------------------
William T. Neary -- United States Trustee for Region 6, Northern
and Eastern Districts of Texas, upon the issuance by the court of
an order directing the appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee -- on
July 11, 2016, filed a notice of the appointment of Mr. Jason
Searcy as the Chapter 11 Trustee for the estates of Maricopa
Resources, LLC, Payson Petroleum, Inc., and Payson Operating LLC.

Mr. Searcy may be contacted as follows:

         Jason R. Searcy
         P. O. Box 3929
         Longview, TX 75606
         Tel: (903) 757-3399
         E-mail: jrspc@jrsearcylaw.com

The Trustee's bond will initially be set at $10,000 for this case.

A hearing was held July 11, 2016, on the motions to appoint Chapter
11 Trustee filed by Maricopa Resources, Payson Petroleum, and
Payson Operating.  Present were Mark A. Weisbart on behalf of the
Debtor, Mark I. Agee, counsel for Michelle Chow, Chapter 7 Trustee,
J. Blake Hamm of Snow Spence Green LLP, counsel for Baker Hughes
Oilfield Operations, Inc., Aaron Z. Tobin of Anderson Tobin PLLC,
counsel for JMW Recovery LLC, Kenneth Stohner, Jr. of Jackson
Walker LLP, counsel for Integrated Fluid Systems LLC, Ranger
Consulting Company LLC, Ranger Directional Services LLC.  After
appropriate notice and opportunity for hearing, the Court finds
that cause exists to appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee for the Debtors
upon conversion of the cases from Chapter 7 to Chapter 11.

The U.S. Trustee can be reached at:

         William T. Neary
         United States Trustee
         John Vardeman
         Tx. Bar 20496260
         300 Plaza Tower
         110 N. College
         Tyler, TX 75702
         Tel: (903) 590-1450x218
         Fax: (903) 590-1461

                         About the Debtors

Maricopa Resources, LLC, Payson Operating, LLC, and Payson
Petroleum, LLC, each filed a Chapter 7 petition (Banrk. E.D. Tex.
Case No. 16-41043 to 16-41043) on June 10, 2016.  The Debtors are
represented by Mark A. Weisbart, Esq., at The Law Office of Mark A.
Weisbart -- weisbartm@earthlink.net -- in Dallas.

Michelle Chow was named Chapter 7 trustee but was terminated
effective July 12, 2016.  The trustee was represented by Mark I.
Agee, Esq.

The cases are assigned to Judge Brenda T. Rhoades.


MCNEILL GROUP: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor affiliates filing separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions:

       Debtor                                       Case No.
       ------                                       --------
       McNeill Group, Inc.                          16-14943
       c/o Ciardi Ciardi & Astin
       2005 Market Street
       One Commerce Square, Suite 3500
       Philadelphia, PA 19103

       McNeill Properties V, LLC                    16-14944
       4152 Quakerbridge Road
       Lawrence Township, NJ 08648

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2016

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)

Judge: Hon. Jean K. FitzSimon (16-14943)
       Hon. Ashely M. Chan (16-14944)

Debtors' Counsel: Albert A. Ciardi, III, Esq.
                  CIARDI CIARDI & ASTIN, P.C.
                  One Commerce Square
                  2005 Market Street, Suite 3500
                  Philadelphia, PA 19103
                  Tel: (215) 557-3550
                  Fax: 215-557-3551
                  E-mail: aciardi@ciardilaw.com

                                       Estimated    Estimated  
                                        Assets     Liabilities
                                      ----------   -----------
McNeill Group, Inc.                   $10M-$50M    $10M-$50M
McNeill Properties                    $10M-$50M    $10M-$50M

The petitions were signed by Edward J. McNeill, Jr., president.

A. List of McNeill Group, Inc.'s 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Anne Dashine                                              $4,250

AV Rental Services, Inc.                                  $5,952

Brown Printing Company                                    $8,674

Bruce Serlen                                              $3,904

Buses, LLC                                                $6,094

Capital Health                                            $7,425

Fry Communications, Inc.                                 $41,347

Independent Blue Cross                                     $4,530

Internal Revenue Service                                 $320,054
Dept of Treasury-
Appeals Office
701 Market Street, Suite 2200
Philadelphia, PA 19106

Iron Mountain                                              $2,871

Jeffrey Cohen                                              $5,324

Joe Kimmel                                                 $4,800

Lear & Pannepacker, LLP                                   $19,119

Media Intranets                                            $7,155

MdJersey Chamber of Commerce                              $36,790

Mike Bederka                                               $6,000

National Premium, Inc.                                     $4,104

Publishers Press                                          $15,995

Re/Max Properties Ltd                                      $2,867

Zeilinski Financial Advisors                               $3,880

B. List of McNeill Properties' 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
AMSCAP                                                     $2,793

Buchanan Ingersoll-Rooney P.C.                             $5,882

EC Bentz Electrical Contractor                             $8,200
Inc.

ECBM, LP                                                   $2,919

Epic Brands                                                $5,446

Flat Iron Capital                                         $14,227

Home Depot Credit Services                                 $4,465

Lear & Pannepacker, LLP                                  $112,492

Mercer Community Construction                              $8,460

Penn Jersey Paper Co.                                      $8,790

Performance Food Centers                                   $5,881

Phila Coca-Cola Bottling Co.                               $2,193

Premier Construction Group                                     $0

PSE&G                                                     $17,219

Stark & Stark      
Attorneys at Law                                           $5,483

State of New Jersey                                       $93,984
Dept of the Treasury


Talley Sign Company                                        $5,589

Trentypo, Inc.                                             $3,611

Waste Management                                           $2,094

Williard Limbach                                           $8,701


METCOM NETWORK: Hires Ackerman Fox as Counsel
---------------------------------------------
Metcom Network Services, Inc. seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to employ
Ackerman Fox, LLP as counsel, nunc pro tunc to June 28, 2016.

The Debtor requires Ackerman Fox to:

   (a) represent the Debtor, as debtor-in-possession, to prepare
       and file a chapter 11 bankruptcy petition and schedules,
       all necessary motions, applications, answers, orders,
       monthly reports and other necessary and appropriate
       documents in connection with the administration of the
       Debtor's estate;

   (b) prepare and file all necessary adversary proceedings and
       documents in connection with adversary proceedings and
       other papers;

   (c) advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties as
       a debtor and debtor-in-possession in the continued
       management and operation of his financial affairs;

   (d) appear at all appropriate meetings before this Court, any
       appellate courts, and the U.S. Trustee, and protect the
       interests of the Debtor's estate before such courts and the

       U.S. Trustee;

   (e) represent the Debtor in actions to protect and preserve the

       Debtor's estate, including the prosecution of actions on
       its behalf, the defense of any actions commenced against
       the estate, negotiations concerning all litigation in which

       the Debtor may be involved and object to claims filed
       against the estate;

   (f) assist the Debtor in formulating and negotiating a plan of
       reorganization and disclosure statement; and

   (g) perform such other further legal services to the Debtor
       which may be necessary herein.

Ackerman Fox will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Neil Ackerman            $475
       Partners/Of Counsel      $425
       Associates               $350
       Paralegals               $125

Ackerman Fox will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

On or about June 24, 2016, Ackerman Fox received a retainer of
$35,000 for services rendered or to be rendered in connection with
the Chapter 11 case, in addition to expenses of $1,717 to
compensate for the filing fee, and $18 to reimburse for a wire
transfer charge assessed by Ackerman Fox's Bank.

Neil H. Ackerman, member of Ackerman Fox, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Ackerman Fox can be reached at:

       Neil H. Ackerman, Esq.
       Kamini Fox, Esq.
       ACKERMAN FOX, LLP
       90 Merrick Ave., Suite 400
       East Meadow, NY 11554
       Tel: (516) 493-9920
       Fax: (516) 228-3396
       E-mail: nackerman@ackermanfox.com
               kfox@ackermanfox.com

                        About Metcom Network

Metcom Network Services, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-11870) on June 28,
2016.  The petition was signed by Mark DuMoulin, Sr., president.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.


ML AUTO CENTER: Hires Halabu as Bankruptcy Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
ML Auto Center, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan to employ Halabu Law Group,
P.C. as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.

ML Auto Center requires Halabu to assist and represent the Debtor
in all legal matters arising in and under the Chapter 11 case.

Halabu will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Peter Halabu            $300

Halabu will be paid $10,000 as initial retainer. The amount of
$1,717 will be applied to filing fee, and $8,283 will be paid after
payment of filing fee and payment of fees incurred within 30 days
of bankruptcy.

Halabu will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Peter Halabu, member of Halabu Law Group, P.C., assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Halabu can be reached at:

     Peter S. Halabu (P74086)
     HALABU LAW GROUP, P.C.
     255 S. Old Woodward, Ste. 310
     Birmingham, MI 48009
     Tel: (248) 559-5999
     E-mail: peter@halabu.net

                       About ML Auto Center

ML Auto Center, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
E.D. Mich. Case No. 16-47169) on May 11, 2016. The Debtor is
represented by Peter Steven Halabu, Esq.


MONTREIGN OPERATING: S&P Discontinues 'B-' Rating on Sr. Sec. Loan
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings discontinued its 'B-' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating on Monticello, N.Y.-based Montreign Operating Co.
LLC's proposed senior secured term loan in response to Empire
Resorts' (parent company of Montreign) announcement that its
largest stockholder (Kien Huat) has committed to provide Montreign
with up to $525 million of financing in the form of debt and/or
equity that it cannot obtain from third-party financing sources to
complete the casino project and provide the company with greater
flexibility in assessing financing alternatives for the project.
S&P believes Montreign will likely delay seeking alternative
third-party financing until after New Jersey voters decide whether
to expand gaming outside Atlantic City to the northern part of the
state in the November 2016 general election.  The 'B-' corporate
credit rating and stable outlook remain unchanged given that the
company's largest shareholder will provide financing for the
project.  However, S&P will continue to monitor the situation for
any potential impact to the rating as more information becomes
available.

RATINGS LIST

Montreign Operating Co. LLC
Corporate Credit Rating          B-/Stable/--


Rating Discontinued
                                  To          From
Montreign Operating Co. LLC
Senior Secured                   NR          B-
  Recovery Rating                 NR          3H


NEONODE INC: FMR LLC No Longer a Shareholder
--------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 8, 2016, FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson,
director, vice chairman, chief executive officer and the president
of FMR, disclosed that they have ceased to be the beneficial owners
of shares of common stock of Neonode Inc.  A copy of the regulatory
filing is available at https://is.gd/4DFHGV

                      About Neonode Inc.
           
Lafayette, Calif.-based Neonode Inc. (OTC BB: NEON)
-- http://www.neonode.com/-- provides optical touch screen
solutions for hand-held and small to midsize devices.

Neonode reported a net loss attributable to the Company of
$7.82 million on $11.11 million of net revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss attributable to the Company
of $14.23 million on $4.74 million of net revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of March 31, 2016, Neonode had $5.48 million in total assets,
$4.97 million in total liabilities and $513,000 in total
stockholders' equity.


NEW ENTERPRISE: Incurs $10.1 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------------
New Enterprise Stone & Lime Co., Inc. filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss attributable to the Company of $10.12 million on $135.39
million of total revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2016,
compared to a net loss attributable to the
Company of $19.3 million on $141 million of total revenue for the
three months ended May 31, 2015.

As of May 31, 2016, New Enterprise had $656 million in total
assets, $851 million in total liabilities and a total deficit of
$196 million.

As of May 31, 2016, the Company had no borrowings under its
Revolving Credit Agreement with $88.4 million available compared to
no borrowings under the RCA, with $80.6 million available as of
Feb. 29, 2016.  As of May 31, 2016, the Company had $0.5 million in
cash and cash equivalents and working capital of $112.9 million
compared to $40.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and working
capital of $121.2 million as of Feb. 29, 2016.  Cash balances of
$16.9 million and $22.7 million as of May 31, 2016, and Feb. 29,
2016, respectively, were restricted in certain consolidated
subsidiaries for insurance requirements or for the purchase of
fixed assets.  Given the nature and seasonality of the Company's
business, the Company typically experiences significant
fluctuations in working capital needs and balances during its peak
summer season; these amounts are converted to cash over the course
of its normal operating cycle.

"We believe we have sufficient financial resources, including cash
and cash equivalents, cash from operations and amounts available
for borrowing under the RCA, to fund our business and operations,
including capital expenditures and debt service obligations, for at
least the next twelve months.  Under the Credit Facilities we are
subject to certain affirmative and negative covenants, of which the
minimum EBITDA covenant and the capital expenditure limitation are
the primary financial covenants for the next twelve months.  As of
the end of each fiscal quarter, we are required to have trailing
twelve-month EBITDA in an amount not less than certain amounts
specified in the Credit Facilities.  Our capital expenditure
limitation for fiscal year 2017 is $45.0 million, adjusted for
certain asset proceeds in accordance with amendments. As of May 31,
2016, we were in compliance with all of our covenant requirements
through that date, and expect to remain in compliance for the next
twelve months as applicable."

A conference call to review financial results and discuss market
drivers will be held on Friday, July 29, 2016, at 9 a.m. ET.  An
audio webcast of the conference call may be accessed through a link
on the Investor Relations page of the Company's website at
www.nesl.com.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/OubJxy

                    About New Enterprise

New Enterprise Stone & Lime, Co., Inc., is a privately held,
vertically integrated construction materials supplier and
heavy/highway construction contractor in Pennsylvania and western
New York and a national traffic safety services and equipment
provider.

New Enterprise reported a net loss of $21.1 million for the year
ended Feb. 29, 2016, following a net loss of $62.5 million for the
year ended Feb. 28, 2015.


OAK RIVER ASSET: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Oak River Asset Management LLC
        400 S. Hope St., Suite 1050
        Los Angeles, CA 90004

Case No.: 16-19233

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2016

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Judge: Hon. Deborah J. Saltzman

Debtor's Counsel: David B Golubchik, Esq.
                  LEVENE NEALE BENDER YOO & BRILL LLP
                  10250 Constellation Blvd Ste 1700
                  Los Angeles, CA 90067
                  Tel: 310-229-1234
                  E-mail: dbg@lnbyb.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Debts: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Lawrence Perkins, authorized agent.

List of Debtor's Five Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
AHA 2012 LLC                                                  $0

Christopher D. Lee                                            $0

Frank Lee, T'ee of Lee                                        $0
Living Trust

Los Angeles County                                        Unknown
Tax Collector

YCJS 2012 LLC                                                  $0


PACIFIC SUNWEAR: Hires Deloitte as Tax Service Provider
-------------------------------------------------------
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc., et al., seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ
Deloitte Tax LLP as tax service provider to the Debtors, nunc pro
tunc to June 16, 2016.

Pacific Sunwear requires Deloitte to prepare the Puerto Rico
Corporation Income Tax Return for the year ended January 30, 2016.

Deloitte will be paid $7,000 for the services rendered.

Deloitte will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

To the best of the Debtors' knowledge the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and
their estates.

Deloitte can be reached at:

     Scott Ferguson
     DELOITTE TAX LLP
     555 West 5th Street, Suite 2711
     Los Angeles, CA 90013
     Tel: (213) 688-0800
     Fax: (213) 688-0100

                      About Pacific Sunwear

Founded in 1982 in Newport Beach, California as a surf shop,
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. operates in the teen and young
adult retail sector, selling men's and womens apparel, accessories,
and footwear. The Company went public in 1993 (NASDAQ: PSUN), and
peaked with 965 stores in 2006. At present, the Company has
approximately 593 retail locations nationwide under the names
"Pacific Sunwear" and "PacSun," which stores are principally in
mall locations. The Company has 2,000 full-time workers. Through
its ecommerce business, the Company operates an e-commerce site at
http://www.pacsun.com/

Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc., and two affiliated debtors
each filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 16-10882) on
April 7, 2016.  The cases are pending before the Honorable Laurie
Selber Silverstein.

The Debtors sought Chapter 11 protection with a Chapter 11 plan
that would convert debt into equity.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, and Klee,
Tuchin, Bogdanoff & Stern LLP as attorneys; FTI Consulting, Inc.,
as financial advisor; Guggenheim Securities, LLC, as investment
banker; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors retained Cooley LLP
and Bayard, P.A. as counsel; and Province Inc. as its financial
advisor.


PARADIGM HIGH SCHOOL: S&P Raises School Revenue Bonds Rating to BB
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its long-term rating to 'BB' from 'BB-'
on the Utah Charter School Finance Authority's charter school
revenue bonds issued on behalf of Paradigm High School (PHS).  The
outlook is stable.

"The raised rating reflects our view of the significant progress
the school has made with its finances during the past couple years
and compliance with its bond covenants in fiscal 2015, which helps
offset the weakness in the enrollment and demand profile," said S&P
Global Ratings credit analyst Amber Schafer.  

The Utah State Charter School Board approved Paradigm's charter on
March 16, 2006, and the school opened in fiscal 2007.  Although its
charter is subject to revocation, as with other Utah charter
schools, there is no expiration date.  The school is one of a small
number of charter high schools in the state that uses a curriculum
centered on the Britannica Great Books and has an educational
approach analogous to that of a small liberal arts college.


PAYSON OPERATING: Case Converted to Chapter 11, Trustee Named
-------------------------------------------------------------
William T. Neary -- United States Trustee for Region 6, Northern
and Eastern Districts of Texas, upon the issuance by the court of
an order directing the appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee -- on
July 11, 2016, filed a notice of the appointment of Mr. Jason
Searcy as the Chapter 11 Trustee for the estates of Maricopa
Resources, LLC, Payson Petroleum, Inc., and Payson Operating LLC.

Mr. Searcy may be contacted as follows:

         Jason R. Searcy
         P. O. Box 3929
         Longview, TX 75606
         Tel: (903) 757-3399
         E-mail: jrspc@jrsearcylaw.com

The Trustee's bond will initially be set at $10,000 for this case.

A hearing was held July 11, 2016, on the motions to appoint Chapter
11 Trustee filed by Maricopa Resources, Payson Petroleum, and
Payson Operating.  Present were Mark A. Weisbart on behalf of the
Debtor, Mark I. Agee, counsel for Michelle Chow, Chapter 7 Trustee,
J. Blake Hamm of Snow Spence Green LLP, counsel for Baker Hughes
Oilfield Operations, Inc., Aaron Z. Tobin of Anderson Tobin PLLC,
counsel for JMW Recovery LLC, Kenneth Stohner, Jr. of Jackson
Walker LLP, counsel for Integrated Fluid Systems LLC, Ranger
Consulting Company LLC, Ranger Directional Services LLC.  After
appropriate notice and opportunity for hearing, the Court finds
that cause exists to appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee for the Debtors
upon conversion of the cases from Chapter 7 to Chapter 11.

The U.S. Trustee can be reached at:

         William T. Neary
         United States Trustee
         John Vardeman, Esq.
         Tx. Bar 20496260
         300 Plaza Tower
         110 N. College
         Tyler, TX 75702
         Tel: (903) 590-1450x218
         Fax: (903) 590-1461

                         About the Debtors

Maricopa Resources, LLC, Payson Operating, LLC, and Payson
Petroleum, LLC, each filed a Chapter 7 petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex.
Case No. 16-41043 to 16-41043) on June 10, 2016.  The Debtors are
represented by Mark A. Weisbart, Esq., at The Law Office of Mark A.
Weisbart -- weisbartm@earthlink.net -- in Dallas.

Michelle Chow was named Chapter 7 trustee but was terminated
effective July 12, 2016.  The trustee was represented by Mark I.
Agee, Esq.

The cases are assigned to Judge Brenda T. Rhoades.


PAYSON PETROLEUM: Case Converted to Chapter 11; Trustee Named
-------------------------------------------------------------
William T. Neary -- United States Trustee for Region 6, Northern
and Eastern Districts of Texas, upon the issuance by the court of
an order directing the appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee -- on
July 11, 2016, filed a notice of the appointment of Mr. Jason
Searcy as the Chapter 11 Trustee for the estates of Maricopa
Resources, LLC, Payson Petroleum, Inc., and Payson Operating LLC.

Mr. Searcy may be contacted as follows:

         Jason R. Searcy
         P. O. Box 3929
         Longview, TX 75606
         Tel: (903) 757-3399
         E-mail: jrspc@jrsearcylaw.com

The Trustee's bond will initially be set at $10,000 for this case.

A hearing was held July 11, 2016, on the motions to appoint Chapter
11 Trustee filed by Maricopa Resources, Payson Petroleum, and
Payson Operating.  Present were Mark A. Weisbart on behalf of the
Debtor, Mark I. Agee, counsel for Michelle Chow, Chapter 7 Trustee,
J. Blake Hamm of Snow Spence Green LLP, counsel for Baker Hughes
Oilfield Operations, Inc., Aaron Z. Tobin of Anderson Tobin PLLC,
counsel for JMW Recovery LLC, Kenneth Stohner, Jr. of Jackson
Walker LLP, counsel for Integrated Fluid Systems LLC, Ranger
Consulting Company LLC, Ranger Directional Services LLC.  After
appropriate notice and opportunity for hearing, the Court finds
that cause exists to appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee for the Debtors
upon conversion of the cases from Chapter 7 to Chapter 11.

The U.S. Trustee can be reached at:

         William T. Neary
         United States Trustee
         John Vardeman
         Tx. Bar 20496260
         300 Plaza Tower
         110 N. College
         Tyler, TX 75702
         Tel: (903) 590-1450x218
         Fax: (903) 590-1461

                         About the Debtors

Maricopa Resources, LLC, Payson Operating, LLC, and Payson
Petroleum, LLC, each filed a Chapter 7 petition (Banrk. E.D. Tex.
Case No. 16-41043 to 16-41043) on June 10, 2016.  The Debtors are
represented by Mark A. Weisbart, Esq., at The Law Office of Mark A.
Weisbart -- weisbartm@earthlink.net -- in Dallas.

Michelle Chow was named Chapter 7 trustee but was terminated
effective July 12, 2016.  The trustee was represented by Mark I.
Agee, Esq.

The cases are assigned to Judge Brenda T. Rhoades.


PELICAN REAL ESTATE: Hires Baker & Hostetler as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Pelican Real Estate, LLC, et al., seek authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to employ Baker
& Hostetler LLP as counsel to the Debtors, nunc pro tunc to June 8,
2016.

Pelican Real Estate requires Baker & Hostetler to:

   a. advise Debtors of their powers and duties as debtors-in-
      possession in the continued operation of their businesses
      and management of their properties;

   b. assist, advise and represent the Debtors in their
      consultations with creditors regarding the administration
      of their cases;

   c. provide assistance, advice and representation concerning
      the preparation and negotiation of a plan of reorganization
      and disclosure statement and any asset sales or other
      transactions proposed in connection with the cases;

   d. provide assistance, advice and representation concerning
      any investigation of assets, liabilities and financial
      condition of the Debtors that may be required;

   e. represent the Debtors at hearings on matters pertaining to
      their affairs as debtors-in-possession;

   f. prosecute and defend litigation matters and such other
      matters that might arise during and related to their cases,
      except to the extent that the Debtors have employed or
      hereafter seek to employ special litigation counsel;

   g. provide counseling and representation with respect to the
      assumption and rejection of executor contracts and leases
      and other bankruptcy-related matters arising from the
      cases; and

   h. render advise with respect to general corporate and
      litigation issues relating to the cases, including, but not
      limited to, corporate finance, real estate, regulatory, tax
      and commercial matters; and perform such other legal
      services as may be necessary and appropriate for the
      efficient and economical administration of the cases.

As set forth in the engagement letter, the Debtor agreed to pay an
advance retainer fee of $250,000 for the filing of nine petitions,
together with restructuring and related services. However, the
Debtors paid Baker & Hostetler only $125,000 in advance of the
petition date. Baker & Hostetler has agreed to waive payment of the
remaining $125,000 and thus the advance retainer totals only
$125,000.

As of the petition date, Baker & Hostetler estimates that the
balance of the retainer equals $74,634 on a current basis, for
services rendered and costs incurred prior to commencement of the
cases with respect to the preparing the nine petitions for
reorganization under Chapter 11, filing related initial pleadings
in the cases, and for prepetition expenses in the cases.

Baker & Hostetler will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

To the best of the Debtors' knowledge the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and
their estates.

Baker & Hostetler can be reached at:

     Elizabeth A. Green, Esq.
     Wendy C. Townsend, Esq.
     Baker & Hostetler LLP
     200 S. Orange Ave.
     SunTrust Center, Suite 2300
     Orlando, FL 32801-3432
     Tel: (407) 649-4000
     Fax: (407) 841-0168
     E-mail: egreen@bakerlaw.com
             wtownsend@bakerlaw.com

                    About Pelican Real Estate

Pelican Real Estate, LLC and its eight affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Lead Case
No. 16-03817) on June 8, 2016.  The petition was signed by Jared
Crapson, president of SMFG, Inc., manager of Pelican Management
Company, LLC.  At the time of the filing, Pelican Real Estate
listed under $50,000 in both assets and debts.


PHOTO STENCIL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Photo Stencil, LLC
        16080 Table Mountain Parkway, Suite 100
        Golden, CO 80403

Case No.: 16-16897

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2016

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado (Denver)

Judge: Hon. Michael E. Romero

Debtor's Counsel: Lee M. Kutner, Esq.
                  KUTNER BRINEN, P.C.
                  1660 Lincoln St., Ste. 1850
                  Denver, CO 80264
                  Tel: 303-832-2400
                  E-mail: lmk@kutnerlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Eric Weissman, CEO.

A copy of the Debtor's list of its 20 largest unsecured creditors
is available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob16-16897.pdf


PLANTATION SWEETS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Plantation Sweets, Inc.
        1652 Ronny Collins Road
        Cobbtown, GA 30420

Case No.: 16-60300

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2016

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Georgia (Statesboro)

Debtor's Counsel: James L Drake, Jr., Esq.
                  JAMES L. DRAKE, JR. P.C.
                  P. O. Box 9945
                  Savannah, GA 31412
                  Tel: 912-790-1533
                  E-mail: jdrake7@bellsouth.net

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Debts: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Ronald A. Collins, president/CEO.

A copy of the Debtor's list of its 20 largest unsecured creditors
is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/gasb16-60300.pdf


PRINTPACK HOLDINGS: S&P Rates Proposed $250MM Sr. Loan 'BB'
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' issue-level rating and '1'
recovery rating to Printpack Holdings Inc.'s proposed $250 million
first-lien senior secured term loan due 2023.  The '1' recovery
rating indicates S&P's expectation for very high (90%-100%)
recovery of principal in the event of a payment default.  The
company will use the proceeds from this term loan to refinance its
existing first- and second-lien term loans and pay fees and
expenses.  All of S&P's other ratings on Printpack Holdings Inc.,
including S&P's 'B+' corporate credit rating, remain unchanged.

The 'B+' corporate credit rating on Printpack reflects S&P's fair
assessment of the company's business risk profile and S&P's
aggressive assessment of its financial risk profile.

With annual revenue of about $1.3 billion, family owned Printpack
Holdings Inc. is a domestic producer of flexible rollstock, which
is mainly used in the packaging of relatively stable salted snack
foods, as well as cookies, confectionery, bakery products, coffee,
and pet food.  Other goods that the company produces include bags,
pouches, and rigid packaging for food and consumer products.

                         RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key Analytical Factors

S&P's simulated default scenario assumes a payment default
occurring in 2020 due to a significant economic downturn that
affects the demand for packaged consumer products, which is
compounded by increased competitive pressure and adverse changes in
raw material prices.  S&P estimates that Printpack's EBITDA would
need to decline by about 46% from current levels for the company to
default, which is unlikely in the next 12-18 months.  S&P assumes
that Printpack would regain some of its lost volume and improve its
margins while in bankruptcy, resulting in $65 million of EBITDA at
emergence.

Simulated default assumptions
   -- Simulated year of default: 2020
   -- EBITDA at emergence: $65 million
   -- EBITDA multiple: 5.5x

Simplified waterfall
   -- Net enterprise value (after 5% admin. costs): $339.6 million
   -- Valuation split (obligors/nonobligors): 92%/8%
   -- Priority claims: $111 million
   -- Value available to first-lien debt claims
      (collateral/noncollateral):$244.7 million/$9.9 million
   -- Secured first-lien debt claims: $253.1 million
      -- First-lien recovery expectations: 90%-100%

Note: All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.
Collateral value equals asset pledge from obligors after priority
claims plus equity pledge from nonobligors after nonobligor debt.

RATINGS LIST

Printpack Holdings Inc.
Corporate Credit Rating                 B+/Stable/--

New Rating

Printpack Holdings Inc.
$250M 1st-Ln Sr Secd Trm Ln Due 2023    BB
  Recovery Rating                        1


QUICKSILVER RESOURCES: Milbank Tweed Represents 2nd Lienholders
---------------------------------------------------------------
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware a fourth supplemental verified
statement pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure in connection with its representation of an ad hoc group
of (i) certain lenders under the Second Lien Credit Agreement,
dated as of June 21, 2013, among Quicksilver Resources Inc., the
lenders from time to time party thereto, Credit Suisse AG as
administrative agent, and (ii) certain holders of the notes issued
by Quicksilver pursuant to the second lien indenture, dated as of
June 21, 2013, among Quicksilver, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, National Association as indenture trustee.

In November 2014, certain Second Lienholders retained Milbank
Tweed, and in March 2015 the Ad Hoc Group of Second Lienholders
retained Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, to represent them
with respect to the Second Lien Documents.  From time to time
thereafter, additional lenders under the Second Lien Credit
Agreement and holders of the Second Lien Notes have joined the Ad
Hoc Group of Second Lienholders.

As of the date of this Fourth Supplemental Verified Statement,
Milbank Tweed represents only the Ad Hoc Group of Second
Lienholders and does not represent or purport to represent any
entities other than the Ad Hoc Group of Second Lienholders in
connection with the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.  In addition, the Ad
Hoc Group of Second Lienholders does not represent or purport to
represent any other entities in connection with the Debtors'
Chapter 11 cases.

The members of the Ad Hoc Group of Second Lienholders hold
disclosable economic interests or act as investment managers or
advisors to funds and accounts that hold disclosable economic
interests in relation to the Debtors.  In accordance with
Bankruptcy Rule 2019 and based upon information provided to Milbank
Tweed by each member of the Ad Hoc Group of Second Lienholders, a
list of the names, addresses, and the nature and amount of all
disclosable economic interests of each present
member of the Ad Hoc Group of Second Lienholders in relation to the
Debtors as of June 29, 2016, is available at:

http://bankrupt.com/misc/QUICKSILVERRESOURCES_1540_rule2019.pdf

The Counsel for the Ad Hoc Group of Second Lienholders can be
reached at:

     YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
     Michael R. Nestor, Esq.
     Kara Hammond Coyle, Esq.
     Rodney Square
     1000 North King Street
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Tel: (302) 571-6600
     Fax: (302) 571-1253

          -- and --

     MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP
     Dennis F. Dunne, Esq.
     Samuel A. Khalil, Esq.
     Brian Kinney, Esq.
     28 Liberty Street
     New York, New York 10005
     Tel: (212) 530-5000
     Fax: (212) 530-5219

                    About Quicksilver Resources

Quicksilver Resources Inc. (OTCQB: KWKA) is an exploration and
production company engaged in the development and production of
long-lived natural gas and oil properties onshore North America.
Based in Fort Worth, Texas, the company claims to be a leader in
the development and production from unconventional reservoirs
including shale gas, and coal bed methane.  Following more than 30
years of operating as a private company, Quicksilver became public
in 1999.

The Company has U.S. offices in Fort Worth, Texas; Glen Rose,
Texas; Steamboat Springs, Colorado; Craig, Colorado and Cut Bank,
Montana.  The Company's Canadian subsidiary, Quicksilver Resources
Canada Inc. is headquartered in Calgary, Alberta.

On March 17, 2015, Quicksilver Resources Inc. and certain of its
affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code in Delaware.  Quicksilver's Canadian
subsidiaries were not included in the Chapter 11 filing.

The Company's legal advisors are Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
in the U.S. and Bennett Jones in Canada.  Richards Layton & Finger,
P.A., is legal co-counsel in the Chapter 11 cases.  Houlihan Lokey
Capital, Inc., is serving as financial advisor.  Garden City Group
Inc. is the claims and noticing agent.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2014, showed $1.21 billion
in total assets, $2.35 billion in total liabilities and a
stockholders' deficit of $1.14 billion.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed five creditors of
Quicksilver Resources Inc. to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors.

                           *     *     *

The Debtors won approval to sell substantially all assets to
BlueStone Natural Resources II, LLC.  BlueStone offered $240
million to acquire Quicksilver's oil and gas assets located in the
Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth basin of North Texas, and $5
million for those assets located in the Delaware basin in West
Texas.


RICEBRAN TECHNOLOGIES: Announces Final Annual Meeting Results
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ricebran Technologies filed an amended Form 8-K with the Securities
and Exchange Commission to provide the final voting results of the
Annual Meeting.

On July 5, 2016, the independent inspector of elections for the
Annual Meeting delivered its final tabulation of voting results for
each of the matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting.  

According to the final tabulation of voting results, W. John Short,
Henk W. Hoogenkamp, Baruch Halpern, David Goldman, Brent Rosenthal,
Beth Bronner, and Michael Goose have been elected as directors to
serve on the Board of Directors until the 2017 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders or until their successors have been duly elected and
qualified.

According to the final tabulation of voting results, Company's
shareholders approved a resolution, on a nonbinding advisory
basis, approving the compensation of our named executive  
officers,

According to the final tabulation of voting results, Company's
shareholders ratified the appointment of Marcum, LLP as the   
Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the
for the year ending Dec. 31, 2016, as disclosed in the Proxy
Statement.

                        About RiceBran

Scottsdale, Ariz.-based RiceBran Technologies, a California
corporation, is a human food ingredient and animal nutrition
company focused on the procurement, bio-refining and marketing of
numerous products derived from rice bran.

RiceBran reported a net loss of $10.6 million on $39.9 million of
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss
of $26.6 million on $40.10 million of revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014.

As of March 31, 2016, RiceBran had $34.9 million in total assets,
$26.9 million in total liabilities and $7.66 million in total
equity attributable to the Company's shareholders.

The Company's auditors Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations resulting in an accumulated
deficit of $251 million at December 31, 2015.  This factor among
other things, raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


RICEBRAN TECHNOLOGIES: Inks Settlement Agreement with LF-RB Mgmt.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RiceBran Technologies entered into a Settlement Agreement with (i)
LF-RB Management, LLC, Stephen D. Baksa, Richard Bellofatto, Edward
M. Giles, Michael Goose, Gary L. Herman, Larry Hopfenspirger and
Richard Jacinto II and (ii) Beth Bronner, Ari Gendason and Brent
Rosenthal.

Among other things, the Settlement Agreement provides that:

   * RBT's Board of Directors will cumulate its votes from the
     2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in favor of the election
     of John Short, Baruch Halpern, Henk Hoogenkamp and David
     Goldman;

   * The LF-RB Group shall cumulate its votes from the 2016
     Shareholder Meeting in favor of Brent Rosenthal, Beth Bronner

     and Michael Goose;

   * Michael Goose will resign from the RBT Board effective
     immediately following his election to the Board, and the RBT
     Board shall appoint Ari Gendason to the RBT Board to fill
     this vacancy;

   * Until the Termination Date, RBT's Board shall nominate the
     LF-RB Designees to the RBT Board at each shareholder meeting
     and recommend that the RBT shareholders vote in favor the
     election of the LF-RB Designees;

   * Until the Termination Date, the size of the Board shall be
     fixed at no more than seven directors; provided, however,
     that the RBT Board shall in good faith consider adding, but
     shall not be obliged to add, a possible eighth director in
     connection with the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and a

     possible ninth director in connection with the 2018 Annual
     Meeting of Shareholders.;

   * Brent Rosenthal will be appointed as Chairperson of the RBT
     Board;
   * The RBT Board shall appoint (i) David Goldman as Chairperson  

     of the Audit Committee, (ii) Beth Bronner as Chairperson of
     the Compensation Committee, (ii) Henk Hoogenkamp and Brent
     Rosenthal as Co-Chairpersons of the Nominating and Governance

     Committee, (iv) Brent Rosenthal, Ari Gendason, Henk
     Hoogenkamp and David Goldman as members of the Nominating and

     Governance Committee.

   * Michael Goose will be appointed as President of Ingredient
     Sales and Marketing for North America (with the intention to
     include global sales and marketing within six months based on

     satisfactory performance);

   * Until the Termination Date, each member of the Shareholder
     Group shall vote their shares of RBT stock at each
     shareholder meeting in accordance with the RBT Board's
     recommendations;

   * Until the Termination Date, without the prior written consent

     of the RBT Board, each member of the Shareholder Group shall
     not (i) acquire Company securities that would result in the
     control or beneficial ownership of more than 10.0% of the
     outstanding shares of RBT common stock, (ii) publicly
     nominate any person for election to the RBT Board or
     participate in the calling of a special meeting of RBT's
     shareholders;

   * RBT will pay the LF-RB Group $50,000 in cash and issue
     100,000 shares of RBT common stock to designees of the LF-RB
     Group to partially reimburse the LF-RB Group for out-of-
     pocket legal fees and other expenses incurred by the LF-RB
     Group in connection with its solicitation of proxies to elect

     its designees to the RBT Board at the 2016 Shareholder
     Meeting; and

   * The Settlement Agreement may be terminated by either side at
     any time following the close of business of Dec. 31, 2018.

                   Resignation of Michael Goose

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Michael Goose resigned from
the RBT Board effective immediately following his election to the
RBT Board.

                    Appointment of Ari Gendason

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, on July 7, 2016, Ari
Gendason, 41, was appointed to the RBT Board to fill the vacancy
created when Mr. Goose resigned from the RBT Board.  Mr. Gendason
will serve on the Nominating and Governance Committee.  Mr.
Gendason is Senior Vice President, Corporate Investments of
Continental Grain Company, a global food and agriculture company.
He has been with Continental Grain Company since 2004.  Mr.
Gendason was formerly an Associate at VantagePoint Venture
Partners, an Associate at Greenbridge Capital, an Associate at RSL
Communications, and an Investment Banking Analyst at CIBC
Oppenheimer.  Mr. Gendason received both his BS in finance and
accounting and his MBA in finance from The Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania.  Mr. Gendason will be compensated
according to RBT's standard compensation policies for directors.

               Appointment of Robert Smith as COO

On July 7, 2016, Robert Smith, PhD, 55, was appointed chief
operating officer of RBT.  Mr. Smith has served as RBT's senior
vice president of operations and R&D since November 2014 and as
senior vice president of sales and business development from
November 2013 to November 2014, and was senior vice president of
business development from March 2012 to November 2013.  Dr. Smith
brings over 20 years' experience managing research and development
and business development in the Ag-biotech industry.  He served as
director of business development at HerbalScience Group from 2007
to 2010 and worked at Affynis LLC from 2010 to 2012 as a
consultant.  Dr. Smith has also served as director of research and
developments at Global Protein Products Inc. and PhycoGen Inc., and
was project leader at Dekalb Genetics, a Monsanto Company.  Dr.
Smith was a research assistant professor at the Ag-Biotech Center
at Rutgers University and did his post-doctoral work in plant
molecular biology at the University of Missouri-Columbia.  He holds
a doctor of philosophy degree in molecular genetics and cell
biology from the University of Chicago and a bachelor of arts
degree in biology from the University of Chicago.

In connection with his appointment as chief operating officer, Dr.
Smith entered into an employment agreement with RBT.  The
employment agreement has a term ending on June 30, 2017.  Pursuant
to the employment agreement, RBT agreed to pay Dr. Smith an annual
salary of $200,000.  Dr. Smith may be eligible to earn an annual
bonus each year up to 50% of his annual salary and a discretionary
bonus each year as determined by the RBT Board or Compensation
Committee.

                  Appointment of Mark McKnight

On July 7, 2016, Mark McKnight, 50, was appointed President of
Contract Manufacturing.  Mr. McKnight has served as the Comopany's
senior vice president of sales & marketing since November 2014 and
as president of its wholly owned subsidiary Healthy Natural, Inc.
(HN) since January 2014.  From January 2014 to November 2014, Mr.
McKnight served as our senior vice president of contract
manufacturing.  Mr. McKnight founded HN and was the CEO and
Chairman of HN since 2008.  Mr. McKnight started developing unique
product formulations in 1995 and has developed successful products
that cover three key channels of distribution, including MLMs,
health food stores and mass retailers.  Mr. McKnight has been in
the natural products industry since 1993, and he is a current
member of the Natural Products Association and the Institute for
Food Technologists.

Mr. McKnight entered into an employment agreement with RBT on Sept.
20, 2013, and an amendment to this employment agreement on Dec. 30,
2013, which employment agreement and amendment continue to be
effective.

          Amendment of Employment Agreement for Dale Belt

On July 7, 2016, J. Dale Belt, RBT's chief financial officer,
amended Mr. Belt's employment agreement to reduce the severance
payable to Mr. Belt if his employment terminates in connection with
a change of control (as defined in Mr. Belt’s employment
agreement).  Before this amendment, Mr. Belt was entitled to
receive a severance amount equal to two years of his annual salary
if his employment terminated in connection with a change of control
transaction.  The amendment to his employment agreement reduced the
severance amount that Mr. Belt would be paid if his employment were
terminated in connection with a change of control transaction to
(i) six months of base salary, if Mr. Belt’s employment is
terminated voluntarily by Mr. Belt, for cause by RBT or for
disability and (ii) twelve months of base salary, if Mr. Belt's
employment is terminated by Mr. Belt for good reason, by the
Company without cause or as a result of Mr. Belt’s death.

                    About RiceBran

Scottsdale, Ariz.-based RiceBran Technologies, a California
corporation, is a human food ingredient and animal nutrition
company focused on the procurement, bio-refining and marketing of
numerous products derived from rice bran.

RiceBran reported a net loss of $10.6 million on $39.9 million of
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss
of $26.6 million on $40.10 million of revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014.

As of March 31, 2016, RiceBran had $34.9 million in total assets,
$26.9 million in total liabilities and $7.66 million in total
equity attributable to the Company's shareholders.

The Company's auditors Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations resulting in an accumulated
deficit of $251 million at December 31, 2015.  This factor among
other things, raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


SCHWAB INDUSTRIES: Court Dismisses Untimely Appeal
--------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned SCHWAB INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant,
v. HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, et al., Appellees, Case No.
5:15-cv-2098, Adv. No. 14-6024 (N.D. Ohio), Judge Sara Lioi of the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division, granted the motions to dismiss filed separately
by appellees Hahn, Loeser & Parks, LLP, Lawrence E. Oscar, and
Andrew Krause and by appellee Huntington National Bank.

On October 7, 2015, appellant Schwab Industries, Inc., who was the
debtor in a Chapter 11 proceeding and the plaintiff in the
adversary proceeding from which the appeal arose, filed its notice
of appeal to the court from two orders of the bankruptcy court, the
first dated October 27, 2014 and the second dated September 21,
2015.

Judge Lioi held that the court lacks jurisdiction to review the
appealed orders of the bankruptcy court because the notice of
appeal was not timely filed.

A full-text copy of Judge Lioi's June 24, 2016 memorandum opinion
is available at https://is.gd/hCoBrH from Leagle.com.

Schwab Industries, Inc. is represented by:

          Charles V. Longo, Esq.
          Matthew D. Greenwell, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF CHARLES V. LONGO
          25550 Chagrin Blvd, Ste 320
          Beachwood, OH 44122
          Tel: (216)514-1919

Huntington National Bank is represented by:

          Andrew S. Nicoll, Esq.
          Robert W. Trafford, Esq.
          PORTER, WRIGHT, MORRIS & ARTHUR
          Huntington Center
          41 South High Street
          Columbus, OH 43215-6194
          Tel: (614)227-2000
          Fax: (614)227-2100
          Email: anicoll@porterwright.com
                 rtrafford@porterwright.com

            -- and --

          Hugh E. McKay, Esq.
          PORTER, WRIGHT, MORRIS & ARTHUR
          950 Main Avenue, Suite 500
          Cleveland, OH 44113
          Tel: (216)443-9000
          Fax: (216)443-9011
          Email: hmckay@porterwright.com

Hahn Loeser & Parks is represented by:

          Daniel R. Warren, Esq.
          Michael A. VanNiel, Esq.
          Thomas D. Warren, Esq.
          BAKER & HOSTETLER
          Key Tower, 127 Public Square, Suite 2000
          Cleveland, OH 44114-1214
          Tel: (216)621-0200
          Fax: (216)696-0740
          Email: dwarren@bakerlaw.com
                 mvanniel@bakerlaw.com
                 twarren@bakerlaw.com

            -- and --

          Jack B. Cooper, Esq.
          DAY KETTERER
          200 Market Avenue N., Suite 300
          Canton, OH 44702
          Tel: (330)455-0173
          Fax: (330)455-2633
          Email: jbcooper@dayketter.com

                    About Schwab Industries

Dover, Ohio-based Schwab Industries, Inc., produced, supplied and
distributed ready-mix concrete, concrete block, cement and related
supplies to commercial, governmental and residential contractors
throughout Northeast Ohio and Southwest Florida.

The Company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
N.D. Ohio Case No. 10-60702) on Feb. 28, 2010.  Affiliates Medina
Cartage Co.; Medina Supply Company; Quality Block & Supply, Inc.;
O.I.S. Tire, Inc.; Twin Cities Concrete Company; Schwab Ready-Mix,
Inc.; Schwab Materials, Inc.; and Eastern Cement Corp. also sought
bankruptcy protection.  The Parkland Group, Inc., provided
restructuring services and designated Laurence V. Goddard as Chief
Restructuring Officer.  Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP served as
bankruptcy counsel.  Brouse McDowell, LPA, served as special
counsel.  Garden City Group, Inc., served as claims, noticing and
balloting agent.  The Company estimated its assets and liabilities
at $50 million to $100 million.

As part of the bankruptcy, substantially all of the Debtors'
assets via auction.  The Court entered a sale order on May 28,
2010.  Subsequently, the Court confirmed a liquidation plan.
Through the sale and plan, a creditor trust was established for
the benefit of the unsecured creditors and John B. Pidcock was
designated Creditor Trustee.  The Debtor was later renamed SII
Liquidation Company.


SEABOARD REALTY: Court OK's Bid for Default Judgment vs. DiMenna
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Victor A. Bolden of the United States District Court for the
District of Connecticut issued a ruling on the pending motions in
the case captioned UCF I TRUST 1, Plaintiff, v. JOHN J. DIMENNA,
JR., THOMAS L. KELLY, JR., and WILLIAM A. MERRITT, JR., Defendants,
No. 16-cv-00156 (VAB) (D. Conn.).

UCF I Trust I initiated the action against John J. DiMenna, Jr.,
Thomas L. Kelly, Jr., and William A. Merritt, Jr., on February 2,
2016, seeking to recover 22,525,400, allegedly owed for certain
loans in default and to enforce guarantee obligations allegedly
made by the three defendants.  UCF filed a Motion for Prejudgment
Remedy, Motion for Disclosure of Assets, Amended Motion for
Prejudgment Remedy, and Motion for Default on the Amended Motion
for Prejudgment Remedy as to DiMenna.

Judge Bolden held that UCF's Motion for Prejudgment Remedy is moot
because UCF's Amended Motion for Prejudgment Remedy has superseded
it.

Judge Bolden granted UCF's motion for default against DiMenna on
the Amended Motion for Prejudgment Remedy because DiMenna has been
properly served and not only has failed to respond to the Amended
Motion for Prejudgment Remedy but also has had a default entered
against him in the case for his failure to appear at all.
Consequently, the judge also granted UCF's Amended Motion for
Prejudgment Remedy as to DiMenna.  However, since DiMenna has
failed to appear in the case and because the Court may only issue
such an order as to "an appearing defendant," Judge Bolden denied
UCF's Motion for Disclosure of Assets as to DiMenna.

Judge Bolden also granted UCF's Amended Motion for Prejudgment
Remedy as to Kelly and Merritt, as modified by the Court, because
the judge found probable cause that a judgment in the amount of
$555,074.30 as to Kelly and $724,883.56 as to Merritt will be
rendered in favor of UCF.  Accordingly, the judge also granted
UCF's Motion for Disclosure of Assets as to Kelly and Merritt.

A full-text copy of Judge Bolden's June 29, 2016 ruling is
available at https://is.gd/TUvPYn from Leagle.com.

UCF I Trust 1 is represented by:

          Jeffrey M. Sklarz, Esq.
          Kenneth Rosenthal, Esq.
          GREEN & SKLARZ LLC
          700 State St, Ste 100
          New Haven, CT 06511
          Tel: (203)285-8545
          Fax: (203)691-5454
          Email: jsklarz@gs-lawfirm.com
                 krosenthal@gs-lawfirm.com

Thomas L. Kelly, Jr., William A. Merritt, Jr. are represented by:

          Charles A. Deluca, Esq.
          Michael T. Ryan, Esq.
          RYAN RYAN DELUCA, LLP
          707 Summer Street
          Stamford, CT 06901
          Tel: (203)357-9200
          Fax: (203)357-7915
          Email: cdeluca@ryandelucalaw.com
                 mtryan@ryandelucalaw.com

Samuel Febbraio is represented by:

          James L. Brawley, Esq.
          MORRISON, MAHONEY LLP
          Four Stamford Plaza
          107 Elm Street, Suite 403
          Tel: (203)965-4900
          Email: jbrawley@morrisonmahoney.com

                       About Seaboard Realty

Seaboard Realty LLC and certain of its affiliates on Dec. 13, 2015,
filed petitions with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware seeking protection under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code.

Seaboard and its affiliates own a portfolio of first class
commercial real estate in Stamford, Connecticut, including office,
residential and hotel properties.  All operations are expected to
continue as normal throughout this process.

The Chapter 11 filing includes Seaboard Realty LLC and a number of
affiliates it manages, which own the equity of subsidiaries that
directly own the properties, but does not include the
property-owning subsidiaries themselves.

Seaboard Realty LLC is owned by John DiMenna, Thomas Kelly and
William Merritt.  Mr. DiMenna actively managed the Seaboard
operations as the managing member of Seaboard Realty LLC, and
managed the properties owned by its affiliates through a
property-management company owned solely by Mr. DiMenna.

The Debtors have sought and obtained an order authorizing joint
administration of their Chapter 11 cases, with all further
pleadings or other papers to be filed in the case of Newbury
Common Associates, LLC, Case No. 15-12507 (LSS).

The Debtors tapped Dechert LLP as counsel and directing the
accounting firm of Anchin, Block and Anchin as forensic accountant.



STAGE PRESENCE: Court Permits Reopening of Prior Judgment
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael E. Wiles of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York granted permission to reopen a
previously entered judgment based on newly discovered evidence in
the adversary proceeding captioned STAGE PRESENCE INCORPORATED, and
ALLEN NEWMAN, Plaintiffs, v. GENEVE INTERNATIONAL CORP., RONALD L.
BARTHOLOMEW, STEPHEN MENNER, SARA O'MEARA, and YVONNE FEDDERSON,
Defendants, Adv. Pro. No. 15-01415 (MEW) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).

The defendants Stephen Menner and Geneve International Corporation
moved to dismiss the case on various grounds, including their
contention that the claims are barred by principles of res
judicata.  Menner also filed a motion seeking sanctions.  The res
judicata defense, and the motion for sanctions, are premised on the
fact that the Court issued an order on January 17, 2013 that
allowed a prior adversary proceeding to continue as to some
defendants but that dismissed that prior proceeding as against
Menner on the ground that the pleadings in that prior action did
not allege fraud with the specificity required by Rule 7009 of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, which incorporates the
requirements of Rule 9 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

As to the res judicata issues: the plaintiffs initially argued that
the fraud claims currently asserted against Menner and GIC are
different from the claims that were previously asserted.  However,
both the prior complaint and the current complaint alleged fraud by
Menner in connection with the same matter: namely, the funding for
a charity broadcast that occurred in 2010.

The complaint, and the parties' submissions with respect to the
motion to dismiss, were deemed by Judge Wiles to be a motion,
pursuant to Rule 60(b)(2), to reopen the judgment entered in the
prior adversary proceeding.

"The newly discovered evidence resulted in fraud allegations that
are different from those that were alleged prior to entry of the
judgment.  The standard to reopen a judgment based upon a pleading
deficiency on the grounds of newly discovered evidence has been
met.  The motion to dismiss on grounds of res judicata is therefore
denied, and the motion for sanctions is also denied," Judge Wiles
said.

The bankruptcy case is In re: STAGE PRESENCE INCORPORATED, Chapter
11, Debtor, Case No. 12-10525 (MEW) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).

A full-text copy of Judge Wiles' June 24, 2016 memorandum decision
is available at https://is.gd/ZZlMrd from Leagle.com.

Stage Presence Incorporated is represented by:

          Joel Shafferman, Esq.
          SHAFFERMAN & FELDMAN, LLP
          137 5th Avenue, 9th Floor
          New York, NY 10010
          Tel: (212)509-1802
          Fax: (212)509-1831
          Email: joel@shafeldlaw.com

Allen Newman is represented by:

          John Carlson, Esq.
          JOHN CARLSON, ESQ. LAW OFFICE
          519 Walnut Street
          Reading, PA 19601
          Tel: (610)478-1868
          Fax: (610)376-5255
          Email: john.c.carlson@verizon.net

Geneve International Corp. is represented by:

          Michael J. Kasen, Esq.
          KASEN & KASEN
          151 W. 46th Street, 4th Floor
          New York, NY 10036
          Tel: (646)216-3108
          Fax: (646)786-3611
          Email: mkasen@kasenlaw.com

                      About Stage Presence

Stage Presence Incorporated filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y., Case No. 12-10525) on February 9, 2012.  The petition was
signed by Allen Newman, president.

The Debtor has tapped Shafferman & Feldman, LLP as its legal
counsel.

The Debtor estimated assets of $2,309,486 and debts of $1,373,349.

On March 27, 2012, the Office of the United States Trustee
appointed a Committee of Unsecured Creditors in this case.  The
members of the Committee are KZ Video Consultants, Inc. and Alan
Adelman.  On March 4, 2016, the Office of the United States
Trustee
filed an Amended Appointment of a Committee of Unsecured Creditors
in this case, the members of which are KEnigma, Inc. and Alan
Adelman.  Neither the original Committee nor the Amended Committee
has retained counsel.

                        *     *     *

The Troubled Company Reporter, on July 8, 2016, reported that Stage
Presence Incorporated revised its plan of reorganization and
accompanying disclosure statement to, among other things, provide
additional information regarding the treatment of general unsecured
creditors and pending adversary proceedings, which are potential
sources of funding for the plan.

Under the Second Amended Plan, each holder of Allowed Class 2
General Unsecured Claims shall -- in full satisfaction of their
claims -- receive:

     (1) their pro rata share of the proceeds of the Litigation
Fund, if any is generated;

     (2) their pro rata share of the Television Program Revenue;
and

     (3) their pro rata share of 50% of the Debtor's net income
generated by its post confirmation operations, payable in equal
quarterly installments for a period of the earlier of three years
following the Effective Date or such time when their Allowed
claims
are paid, in full, from the Litigation Fund and/or the Television
Program Revenue.


STERLING INTERMEDIATE: S&P Assigns 'B' CCR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned a 'B' corporate credit rating to the
New York-based Sterling Intermediate Corp.  The outlook is stable.


S&P's 'B' issue-level rating on the company's first-lien credit
facilities issued by Sterling Midco Holdings Inc., including the
proposed upsized revolver of $70 million due in 2020 and term loan
of $487 million due in 2022 (including a $50 million add-on)
remains unchanged.  The recovery rating remains '3', indicating
S&P's expectation for meaningful (50%-70%, at the upper-end of the
range) recovery in the event of a payment default.  S&P's
issue-level rating of 'CCC+' on the company's second-lien term loan
of $140 million due 2023 also remains unchanged.  The recovery
rating remains '6', indicating S&P's expectation for negligible
(0%-10%) recovery in the event of payment default.  

"The ratings reflect our expectation the transaction will be
leverage neutral as we believe the company will use the proposed
first-lien term loan add-on of $50 million to pay off the revolver
balance of $45 million," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst
Suyun Qu.

The ratings on Sterling and its subsidiaries reflects S&P Global
Ratings' view that the company's credit metric will remain elevated
in the 6x–7x range in 2016 as the company integrates their first
quarter acquisition of TalentWise.  S&P expects EBITDA margin to be
slightly depressed in 2016 as the cost of integrating outweighs the
synergies realized in the same period.  S&P is assuming the
successful integration of the acquisition will provide the combined
company a wider array of products made available through the
TalentWise technology platform and will drive revenue and EBITDA
expansion in 2017.

S&P's ratings also reflect Sterling's narrow product focus in
pre-hire and post-employment verification services for a broad
range of industries, both domestic and international, including the
highly competitive and fragmented human resource (HR) professional
service industry. Services include criminal background checks,
prior employment verification, education and professional licensing
verification, motor vehicle checks, drug testing, and other related
services.  The company has grown via acquisitions, including that
of TalentWise, into one of the leading players in this niche
market, with STG-Fairway Holdings LLC (d/b/a First Advantage Corp.)
as its largest competitor and HireRight as the next competitor of
scale.  The rest of the market is shared by much smaller
players--about 20-30 competitors in the $10 million to $100 million
revenue range, and hundreds of even smaller players.  S&P believes
the company will take advantage of the fragmentation in the
industry and continue to be acquisitive. Sterling's most recent
acquisition of RISQ, an Asia-Pacific employment background services
provider based in Australia, is indicative of the company's
strategy to grow their presence globally.  The company
predominately participates in the pre- and post-hire verification
space, where customer switching costs are low and competition is
fierce when compared to more integrated human resources platforms.
The competitive nature of the industry and lack of product
differentiation limit the pricing power of ven the larger service
providers.

"The stable outlook reflects our view that Sterling's operating
performance will be relatively stable over the next year and it
will maintain credit measure in line with our base case, which
includes debt-to-EBITDA levels between 6x–7x over the next 12
month as it integrates the TalentWise acquisition.  We project
debt-to-EBITDA levels to decline to the mid-5x range in the next
12–24 months as operating performance improves with realized
synergies.  Out stable outlook also incorporates our view that the
financial sponsor will not initiate shareholder returns in the next
12–24 months," S&P said.


STONE ENERGY: State Street Reports 0.44% Stake as of June 30
------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, State Street Corporation disclosed that as of June 30,
2016, it beneficially owns 24,902 shares of common stock of
Stone Energy Corporation representing .44 percent of the shares
outstanding.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is
available for free at https://is.gd/d7iG0q

                      About Stone Energy

Stone Energy Corporation (NYSE: SGY) is an oil and natural gas
company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and
operation of oil and gas properties.  The Lafayette,
Louisiana-based Company operates in the Gulf of Mexico Basin.

                        *     *     *

The Troubled Company Reporter, on June 17, 2016, reported that S&P
Global Ratings said it raised its corporate credit rating on oil
and gas exploration and production company Stone Energy Corp. to
'CCC-' from 'D'.  The outlook is negative.

S&P also raised the issue-level rating on the company's senior
unsecured debt to 'CCC-' from 'D'.  The recovery rating is '3',
indicating S&P's expectation of meaningful (high end of the 50% to
70% range) recovery if a payment default occurs.

The 'CCC-' corporate credit rating reflects the risk that Stone
could elect to file for Chapter 11 and/or restructure its debt
within the next six months.  S&P expects the borrowing base for
the company's reserve-based lending facility to decrease in the
fall, further pressuring liquidity on top of lower cash flows from
operations.  S&P also notes that the company has an upcoming
$300 million maturity in March 2017, and S&P believes the company
would have trouble accessing capital markets to refinance it given
current market conditions.


STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL: Trustee Sought by NJ Amid Indictment
-------------------------------------------------------------
The State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection, on
Aug. 9, 2016, will appear before the Honorable Christine M.
Gravelle at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, 402 East State Street,
Trenton, New Jersey, to appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee
pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1104(a) and (b) in the Chapter 11 cases
of Strategic Environmental Partners, LLC, Richard W. Bernardi and
Marilyn I. Bernardi.

The State of New Jersey claims the appointment of a Chapter 11
trustee is warranted based upon the Debtors' historic misuse of
corporate resources for personal gain, and the criminal indictment
of debtors Richard Bernardi and SEP pending in the Superior Court
of New Jersey (Docket No. 16-02-00014-S) alleging false
representation, theft by deception, financial facilitation of
criminal activity, theft of services and misconduct by a corporate
official.

"A Chapter 11 Trustee should be appointed because the Debtors have
demonstrably mismanaged and diverted millions of dollars in fees
collected by them for the purpose of redeveloping the Fenimore
Landfill in Roxbury Township, New Jersey (the "Landfill").  By the
terms of an Administrative Consent Order and related Closure Plan
("ACO/CP") executed by the Debtors on Oct. 6, 2011, the Debtors
agreed to place fees received by them to accept regulated, recycled
materials ("tipping fees") into a closure/post-closure care escrow
account.  The Debtors failed to do so, instead diverting monies
that should have been placed into escrow into the personal accounts
of SEP's president, Marilyn Bernardi, and of her children," the
attorney for New Jersey DEP asserts.

The New Jersey DEP's attorneys:

        CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO
        Acting Attorney General of New Jersey
        R.J. Hughes Justice Complex
        25 Market Street
        P.O. Box 093
        Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0093
        By: Kevin J. Fleming
            Robert J. Kinney (rD 038572005)
            Deputy Attorneys General
            Tel: (609) 292-155

                         About the Debtors

Strategic Environmental Partners, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 16-22151) on June 23, 2016. Richard W.
Bernardi and Marilyn I. Bernardi also filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Case No. 16-22153).  Marilyn I. Bernardi is the owner of Strategic
Environmental.

The case judge is Hon. Christine M. Gravelle.

The Debtors tapped Batya G. Wernick, Esq., at the Law Offices of
Batya G. Wernick, as counsel.  

SEP estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and debt of $1
million to $10 million.


SUNEDISON INC: Seeks Approval of Retention Plan for Key Employees
-----------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that SunEdison filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court a motion for an order approving the implementation
of a non-insider key employee retention plan (KERP) and certain
sale incentive plans.  The motion explains, "By all standards, the
KERP is a reasonable -- if not modest -- plan. The plan covers
approximately 125-150 non-insider employees with a proposed total
cost of $7.0 million (and a discretionary pool that provides for a
maximum aggregate cost of $7.6 million). Only approximately 33% of
the KERP awards would be paid to eligible employees.  In addition
to the KERP, this Motion addresses certain other sale-based
compensation programs that the Debtors seek -- to the extent
necessary -- authority from this Court to implement. Utility
Project Incentive Plan: First, is the utility project development
incentive plan (the 'Utility Project Incentive Plan').  This is an
ordinary course incentive program that the Debtors have maintained
year-after-year.  The plan covers certain employees working on the
Company's North American Utility Projects development teams who are
responsible for driving near-term Project sales, and incentive
payments are derived from, and generally funded by, the pertinent
net asset sale proceeds. The Utility Project Incentive Plan
includes one insider employee -- the President of the Company's
North American Utility business unit -- Solar Materials Incentive
Plan: Second, is the deal-based incentive plan (the 'Solar
Materials Incentive Plan') to be implemented in connection with the
sale of the Debtors' solar materials business unit (the 'Solar
Materials Unit'). This plan is similar in concept to the Utility
Project Incentive Plan as the plan payouts are derived from, and
funded by, net sale proceeds (here, the sale of the entire Solar
Materials Unit)." The Court scheduled a July 28, 2016 hearing to
consider the motion.

                    About SunEdison, Inc.

SunEdison, Inc., (OTC PINK: SUNEQ) is a developer and seller of
photovoltaic energy solutions, an owner and operator of clean power
generation assets, and a global leader in the development,
manufacture and sale of silicon wafers to the semiconductor
industry.

On April 21, 2016, SunEdison, Inc., and 25 of its affiliates each
filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos.
16-10991 to 16-11017).  Martin H. Truong signed the petitions as
senior vice president, general counsel and secretary.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $20.71 billion and total
debts of $16.14 billion as of Sept. 30, 2015.

The Debtors have hired Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP as
counsel, Togut, Segal & Segal LLP as conflicts counsel, Rothschild
Inc. as investment banker and financial advisor, McKinsey Recovery
& Transformation Services U.S., LLC, as  restructuring advisors
and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and  noticing agent.  The Debtors
employed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as financial advisors; and KPMG
LLP as their auditor and tax consultant.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.  The committee tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as its
general bankruptcy counsel and Morrison & Foerster LLP as special
counsel.


SUTTON 58 OWNER NY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Sutton 58 Owner LLC
        a New York Limited Liability Company
        428-432 East 58th Street
        New York, NY 10022

Case No.: 16-11986

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2016

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York (Manhattan)

Debtor's Counsel: Joseph S. Maniscalco, Esq.
                  LAMONICA HERBST & MANISCALCO
                  3305 Jerusalem Avenue
                  Wantagh, NY 11793
                  Tel: (516) 826-6500
                  Fax: (516) 826-0222
                  E-mail: jsm@lhmlawfirm.com

Total Assets: $256 million

Total Debts: $6.56 million

The petition was signed by Joseph Beninati, managing member.

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
AAI Architects PC                     Trade Debt         $183,573

Adam Hakim                            Trade Debt         $250,000

Bauhouse Group I, Inc.                Agreement           $50,000

Bryan Cave LLP                     Legal Services        $202,753

Corcoran Sunshine                     Trade Debt         $440,000
660 Madison
Avenue 12th Floor
New York, NY 10065

Cosentini Consulting Engineers        Trade Debt         $150,049


DeSimone Consulting                   Trade Debt          $84,637
Engineering Group LLC

Eastern Consolidated                  Trade Debt         $335,321

FP Arcitects New York Inc.            Trade Debt       $1,061,126
300 West 57th Street
New York, NY 10019

James F. Capalino                     Trade Debt          $80,000
Assoc. Inc.

Jones Lang LaSalle Americas           Trade Debt       $1,892,250
c/o Barry E. Lichtenberg
200 Liberty Street
30th Fl.
New York, NY 10281

LJC Dismantling Corp.                 Trade Debt         $499,505
415-A Meacham Ave
Elmont, NY 11003

Muchnick, Golieb & Golieb PC         Legal Services       $47,800

Pembrooke & Ives                       Trade Debt        $558,966
Luxurious Interiors LLC
330 West 38th St Ste 1001
New York, NY 10018

Rick Stafford                          Trade Debt         $74,500

Rowan Williams                         Trade Debt         $41,600
Davies & Irwin

Steve Meister, Esq.                    Trade Debt         $44,160
Meister Seelig & Fein LLP

The Marino Organization Inc.           Trade Debt         $80,000

Thornton Tomasetti Inc.                Trade Debt         $42,526

Tisman Construction Corp. NY           Trade Debt         $80,000


SWIFT ENERGY: Morris Propp's Bid for Stay Pending Appeal Denied
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned MORRIS PROPP II and MORRIS PROPP II
FOUNDATION, Appellants, v. SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY, et al., Appellees,
Civ. No. 16-404 (GMS)(D. Del.), the United States District Court
for the District of Delaware denied the appellants' emergency
motion for a stay pending appeal.

The appeal arose from a bankruptcy court order entered on May 26,
2016, which granted the appellee-debtors' motion to enforce the
bankruptcy court's prior orders approving a restructuring support
agreement and confirming the appellee-debtors' plan of
reorganization.

Having evaluated the appellants' likelihood of success on the
merits and irreparable injury absent a stay, and having determined
that the appellants have failed to carry their burden as to either
element, Judge Sleet was satisfied that no further analysis is
required.

"If the movant does not make the requisite showings on either of
these first two factors, the inquiry into the balance of harms and
the public interest is unnecessary, and the stay should be denied
without further analysis," Judge Sleet said.

The bankruptcy case is IN RE: SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY, et al.,
Reorganized Debtors, Bankr. Case No. 15-12670 (MWF)(Bankr. D.
Del.).

A full-text copy of the court's June 29, 2016 memorandum opinion is
available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb15-12670-100.pdf

Morris Propp II, Morris Propp II Foundation, are represented by:

     Kevin Scott Mann, Esq.
     CROSS & SIMON, LLC
     1105 North Market Street, Suite 901
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Tel: (302)777-4200
     Fax: (302)777-4224
     Email: kmann@crosslaw.com

Swift Energy Company is represented by:

     Daniel J. DeFranceschi, Esq.
     Brendan Joseph Schlauch, Esq.
     Zachary I. Shapiro, Esq.
     RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, PA
     One Rodney Square
     920 North King Street
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Tel: (302)651-7700
     Fax: (302)651-7701
     Email: dfranceschi@rlf.com
            schlauch@rlf.com
            shapiro@rlf.com

                    About Swift Energy

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Swift Energy Company --
http://www.swiftenergy.com-- is an independent energy company   
engaged in the exploration, development, production and acquisition
of oil and natural gas properties.  Its primary assets and
operations are focused in the Eagle Ford trend of South Texas and
the onshore and inland waters of Louisiana.

Swift Energy Company and eight of its affiliates filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 15-12669 to
15-12677) on Dec. 31, 2015, with a Chapter 11plan of Reorganization
that, among other things, exchanges the approximately $905.1
million outstanding on account of senior notes obligations for 96%
of the common equity in the Reorganized Debtors.

The petitions were signed by Alton D. Heckaman, Jr., the executive
vice president and CFO.  Judge Mary F. Walrath is assigned to the
cases.

Swift Energy Company disclosed total assets of $416,358,243 plus an
undetermined amount and total liabilities of $1,233,022,421 plus an
undetermined amount.  Other Debtors disclosed total assets of $1.02
billion and total debt of $1.34 billion as of Sept. 30, 2015.

The Debtors engaged Jones Day as general counsel; Richards, Layton
& Finger, P.A., as local counsel; Lazard Freres & Co, LLC as
investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC as financial
advisor; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims and noticing
agent.

Reed Smith LLP represents the committee.

Swift Energy Company on April 25 disclosed that it has completed
its financial restructuring and emerged from Chapter 11. The
Company officially concluded its reorganization after completing
all required actions and satisfying the remaining conditions to
its
Plan of Reorganization, which was confirmed by the US Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware by order dated March 31, 2016.
In conjunction with its emergence from Chapter 11, the Company
closed on its new $320 million senior secured credit facility and
on its sale of certain assets in Central Louisiana to TEXEGY LLC.


SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS: Meeting to Form Creditors' Panel Set for July 14
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on July 14, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. in the
bankruptcy case of SynCardia Systems, Inc.

The meeting will be held at:

         J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
         844 King Street, Suite 2112
          Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it represents.


TENNESSEE SEAFOOD: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Tennessee Seafood, LLC
           dba a franchisee of Long John Silvers
        3446 Old Timber Road
        Clarksville, TN 37042

Case No.: 16-04928

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2016

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)

Judge: Hon. Marian F Harrison

Debtor's Counsel: Steven L. Lefkovitz, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES LEFKOVITZ & LEFKOVITZ
                  618 Church St Ste 410
                  Nashville, TN 37219
                  Tel: 615 256-8300
                  Fax: 615 255-4516
                  E-mail: slefkovitz@lefkovitz.com

Total Assets: $114,041

Total Liabilities: $2.38 million

The petition was signed by Farid Rostampour, chief manager.

A copy of the Debtor's list of its 20 largest unsecured creditors
is available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnmb16-04928.pdf


TEXAS COMPETITIVE: S&P Rates $4.25BB DIP Credit Facility 'BB-'
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its point-in-time 'BB-' issue-level
rating to Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC's (TCEH)
proposed $4.25 billion DIP credit facility due
Oct. 31, 2017.  TCEH earns cash flow through the sale of
electricity in wholesale and retail markets in Texas.

The DIP facilities consist of a $750 million revolving credit
facility; a $2.85 billion term loan B; and a $650 million term loan
C that TECH will use to support letter of credit needs (proceeds
will be kept as restricted cash to back letters of credit).  The
facilities are available to refinance the company's existing DIP
facilities--which are scheduled to mature Nov. 7, 2016--and can be
rolled over into exit financing so long as various conditions are
met.

This rating only applies to the DIP facilities and does not
represent the expected rating on any successor loan if this DIP
facility is converted into exit financing.  If the DIP financing is
converted to exit financing, S&P's ratings will be based on its
view of the credit risk of the reorganized entity using its
Corporate Methodology and S&P's view of the recovery prospects on
the exit loan in a subsequent default scenario.

Because the DIP facility rating is a point-in-time rating, it is
effective only for the date of this report, and S&P will not
review, modify, or provide ongoing surveillance of the rating.

Under S&P's approach to rating DIP financing, it has assessed the
credit risk of the DIP facility by evaluating:

   -- The likelihood that a company will be able to successfully
      reorganize and emerge from bankruptcy as a going concern,
      and be able to attract sufficient exit financing to fully
      repay the DIP financing at emergence.  This step is referred

      to as the capacity for repayment at emergence, (CRE), and
      forms the anchor for our DIP issue rating.  The potential
      for a company to repay the DIP financing in the event it is
      unable to successfully reorganize and emerge from
      bankruptcy.  Under this scenario S&P assess the coverage
      assuming the company is either forced to liquidate its
      assets or sell the business under extremely distressed
      conditions.  If S&P projects that the DIP financing is
      sufficiently over-collateralized to be fully repaid in a
      liquidation analysis, the rating may benefit from a one- or
      two-notch enhancement over the anchor score, depending on
      S&P's estimated level of overcollateralization and
      confidence of full repayment.

   -- The impact of the option that TCEH will have to convert the
      DIP facilities into exit financing.

S&P's analysis includes, among other things, its assessment of
TCEH's reorganization efforts, the term sheet for the DIP facility,
and an updated business overview and cash flow forecast from the
company that S&P takes into consideration when forming its own
forecast of financial performance.


TOTAL HOCKEY: Seeks Court Approval of Cash Collateral Use
---------------------------------------------------------
Total Hockey, Inc. et al., sought permission from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to use the
cash collateral of their prepetition agents and prepetition
lenders.

In papers filed with the Court, the Debtors said they have an
immediate and critical need to use Cash Collateral to pay, in
accordance with a budget, employees, landlords, third party
vendors, utilities, insurance companies, taxing authorities, who in
the judgment of the Debtors' management, provide the essential
services needed to operate, maintain and insure the Debtors'
assets.  In addition, the Debtors said they require the use of Cash
Collateral to retain and pay costs of professionals, consultants
and advisors who will enable the Debtors to conduct a sale of their
assets in a manner that maximizes value for the Debtors' estates
and their creditors.

"Without use of Cash Collateral, the Debtors would suffer immediate
and irreparable harm and the entire bankruptcy proceedings will be
jeopardized to the significant detriment of the Debtors' estates
and their creditors," according to Matthew S. Layfield, Esq., at
Polsinelli PC, one of the Debtors' attorneys.

Pursuant to a credit agreement dated as of June 17, 2015, among
Total Hockey, Citizens Business Capital, a division of Citizens
Asset Finance, Inc. (a subsidiary of Citizens Bank, N.A.), as
administrative agent and lead arranger, the revolving credit
lenders provided the Debtors with up to $30,000,000 in aggregate
maximum principal amount of revolving commitments.  As of the
Petition Date, the approximate outstanding principal amount under
the Revolving Credit Facility was $11,344,855.

Pursuant to a term loan agreement dated as of June 17, 2015, among
Total Hockey, Gordon Brothers Finance Company as administrative
agent, the term loan lenders provided the Debtors with a
fully-funded term loan commitment of $5,000,000 in aggregate
principal amount.  As of the Petition Date, the outstanding
principal amount owing under the Term Loan Agreement was
$5,000,000.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors granted security interests
in and liens on, among other things, substantially all of their
assets to: (a) the Revolving Credit Agent, for itself and the
Revolving Credit Lenders; and (b) the Term Loan Agent, for itself
and the Term Loan Lenders.  The Prepetition Agents had indicated a
willingness to authorize the Debtors to use Cash Collateral, but
solely on the terms and conditions set forth in the Interim Order.

The Debtors propose to grant the Revolving Credit Agent, for the
benefit of itself and the Revolving Credit Lenders, and the Term
Loan Agent, for the benefit of itself and the Term Loan Lenders,
are each entitled to receive adequate protection to the extent of
any diminution in value of their respective interests in the
Prepetition Collateral resulting from the use of Cash Collateral,
the use, sale or lease of Prepetition Collateral authorized in the
Interim Order, the subordination of the Revolving Credit Liens and
the Term Loan Liens to the Carve Out and the imposition of the
automatic stay pursuant to Sections 361, 362, and 363 of the
Bankruptcy Code.

                     About Total Hockey

Headquartered in in Maryland Heights, Missouri, Total Hockey, Inc.,
Player's Bench Corporation and Hipcheck, LLC sell lacrosse and
hockey equipment in 32 retail store locations and three
distribution centers in 12 states including Chicago, Minneapolis,
Detroit, and Philadelphia.  The Debtors were formed in in 1999 as a
spin off from a local general sporting goods company.  The Debtors
operate e-commerce sites at http://www.totalhockey.com/,
http://www.goalie.totalhockey.com/, and
http://www.lacrosse.totalhockey.com/ In 2015, the Debtors
generated 27% of their total sales, or approximately $17 million,
through e-commerce.

Each of the Debtors filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Lead Case No. 16-44815) on
July 6, 2016, estimating assets in the range of $10 million to $50
million and liabilities of up to $100 million.  The petition was
signed by Lee A. Diercks as chief restructuring officer.

The Debtors have hired Polsinelli PC as bankruptcy counsel, Spencer
Fane LLP as conflicts counsel, Clear Thinking Group LLC as
investment banker and Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy as claims and
noticing agent.


TRIAD GUARANTY: Summary Judgment in Suit vs. Insurance Co. Affirmed
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Gregory M. Sleet of the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware affirmed the bankruptcy court's summary
judgment order entered June 13, 2014, as well as the bankruptcy
court's entry of judgment on October 22, 2014, in the appeals case
captioned TRIAD GUARANTY INC., Appellant, v. TRIAD GUARANTY
INSURANCE CORP., TRIAD GUARANTY ASSURANCE CORP., AND ANNE MELISSSA
DOWLING, ACTING DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
ACTING AS REHABILITATOR OF TRIAD GUARANTY INSURANCE CORP. AND TRIAD
GUARANTY ASSURANCE CORP., Appellees, Adv. Proc. No. 13-51749 (MFW),
Civ. No. 14-1464 (GMS) (D. Del.).

The appeal was filed by the debtor, Triad Guaranty Inc., of the
order entered by the bankruptcy court on October 22, 2014, in the
adversary proceeding, which granted the debtor's motion for entry
of judgment in favor of the appellees on Counts I, III, V, VI, VII,
and VIII of debtor's adversary complaint, and which incorporated by
reference the bankruptcy court's prior order, entered June 13,
2014, denying the debtor's motion for summary judgment as to Counts
VI and VIII of the complaint.

The bankruptcy case is IN RE: TRIAD GUARANTY INC., Debtor, Bankr.
Case No. 13-11452 (MFW) (Bankr. D. Del.).

A full-text copy of Judge Sleet's June 27, 2016 memorandum opinion
is available at https://is.gd/PYYxeK from Leagle.com.

Triad Guaranty Inc. is represented by:

          Matthew Paul Ward, Esq.
          Thomas Michael Horan, Esq.
          WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE RICE
          222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1501
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Tel: (302)252-4320
          Fax: (302)252-4330
          Email: maward@wcsr.com

Triad Guaranty Insurance Corporation, Triad Guaranty Assurance
Corporation are represented by:

          Howard A. Cohen, Esq.
          DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
          222 Delaware Ave., Ste. 1410
          Wilmington, DE 19801-1621
          Tel: (302)467-4200
          Fax: (302)467-4201
          Email: howard.cohen@dbr.com

                    About Triad Guaranty

Winston-Salem, N.C.-based Triad Guaranty Inc. (OTC BB: TGIC)
-- http://www.triadguaranty.com/-- is a holding company that   
historically provided private mortgage insurance coverage in the
United States through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Triad Guaranty
Insurance Corporation.  TGIC is a nationwide mortgage insurer
pursuing a run-off of its existing in-force book of business.

In December 2012, the Company's mortgage insurer subsidiary, Triad
Guaranty Insurance Corporation, was placed into rehabilitation,
whereby the Illinois Department of Insurance was vested with
possession and control over all of TGIC's assets and operations.

On May 30, 2013, the magistrate judge for the U.S. District Court
of the Middle District of North Carolina issued an order denying
the Company's motion to dismiss a class action lawsuit against the
company and two of its former officers. Shareholders filed the
class action suit in 2009, claiming the company misled investors
about poor financial results caused by improper underwriting
procedures.

Triad Guaranty Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del.
Case No. 13-11452) on June 3, 2013.  The Company estimated assets
of at least $100 million and liabilities of less than $50,000.
Attorneys at Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP, serve as counsel
to the Debtor.  Triad Guaranty tapped Donlin, Recano & Company,
Inc., as claims and noticing agent.


TRINITY RIVER RESOURCES: Lenders Want Telfer Replaced by Trustee
----------------------------------------------------------------
GE Capital EFS Financing, Inc., in its capacity as administrative
agent and collateral agent, for itself and certain financial
institutions, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Texas a motion to appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee in the
case of Trinity River Resources, LP

According to GE, the Case needs a trustee who will act in the
Debtor's best interest and without irreconcilable conflicts of
interest.  GE asserts that the Lenders have made substantial and
good faith efforts to seek a consensual path of resolution in this
Case, but it has become apparent that such a resolution will not be
reached on account of conflicts of interest.

Presently, the Debtor is controlled by Matthew Telfer, who also
controls the Debtor's non-debtor affiliates (the "Telfer
Entities").

"Telfer has (a) caused the Debtor to pay the Telfer Entities tens
of millions of dollars from the Lenders' cash collateral prior to
the Petition Date, often in derogation of the interests of the
Debtor and its creditors; and (b) made ongoing demands on the
Debtor using his control over the Debtor's sale process as leverage
in an improper attempt to extract significant and material value
from the Debtor's estate for the benefit of himself and the Telfer
Entities.  Telfer's track record demonstrates that the Debtor is
incapable of meeting its fiduciary obligations of operating and
managing its business as an independent debtor-in-possession.  As
the party in control of the Debtor and the Telfer Entities,
Telfer's loyalties are inalterably divided.  Those divided
loyalties, along with Telfer's desire to continue to engage in high
risk exploration and drilling activities, have made it impossible
for the Debtor to move expeditiously forward with a sale process
designed to produce the 'highest and best' bid for the Debtor's
creditors.  These actions, repeated over the course of more than a
year, and which have caused irreparable harm to the Debtor,
disqualify Telfer from making the independent decisions that will
maximize the value of this estate," David M. Bennett, Esq., at
Thompson & Knight LLP, explains.

"Telfer filed this Case on the heels of a series of transactions in
which Telfer transferred millions of dollars of value from the
Debtor for the benefit of the Telfer Entities.  In light of such
transactions, the Lenders commissioned a third party investigation
to analyze these transactions.  The results of this investigation
have validated the Lenders' concerns that Telfer has
inappropriately commingled funds and misused the Debtor's assets --
and the Lenders' collateral -- for the benefit of himself and his
other companies.

"Ultimately, Telfer appears to have siphoned millions from the
Debtor to "bankroll" the operations of BBX and other related Telfer
Entities under the guise of, among other things, undistributed
revenue and pre-paid expenses."

"Telfer has also blocked an effective sale process (including
fabricating entitlements of the Telfer Entities' right to remain
the operator) and continuously created delay by making demands of
the Debtor on behalf of the Telfer Entities."

"Further, after a year of pre and post-petition restructuring
activity with no real material progress whatsoever, it has become
obvious that Telfer's strategy is simply to delay any progress
presumably until commodity prices increase.  This delay has and
will continue to cause irreparable harm to the Lenders and to the
other creditors of this estate as the Debtor's assets are depleting
in value with each passing day.  Having been in bankruptcy for
nearly three months without any material progress, Telfer's
conflicts are obvious and irreconcilable.  Consequently, just as
separate counsel has been obtained for the Debtor and for the
Telfer Entities, an independent fiduciary is needed so that the
Debtor can work with the Lenders and other parties-in-interest to
find a value-maximizing sale strategy free of conflict and divided
loyalties.  For example, whether the Debtor should (a) seek the
replacement of BBX as operator given BBX's apparent financial
distress and its demands for additional concessions from the Debtor
and, (b) pursue claims against Telfer and the Telfer Entities for
misuse of funds, needs to be evaluated as soon as possible.  To
ensure that the Debtor moves expeditiously forward in this
Bankruptcy Case with a sale process and otherwise in a manner that
is not impeded by conflicting interests and agendas, a Chapter 11
Trustee should be appointed."

Attorneys for GE Capital EFS Financing, Inc.:

          David M. Bennett, Esq.
          Cassandra Sepanik Shoemaker, Esq.
          THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
          1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
          Dallas, TX 75201
          Telephone: 214/969-1700
          Facsimile: 214/969-1751
          E-mail: david.bennett@tklaw.com
                  cassandra.shoemaker@tklaw.com

                - and -

          Demetra L. Liggins, Esq.
          Ayo O. Shittu, Esq.
          THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
          333 Clay Street, Suite 3300
          Houston, TX 77002
          Telephone: 713.654.8111
          E-mail: demetra.liggins@tklaw.com
                  ayo.shittu@tklaw.com

                       About Trinity River

Trinity River Resources, LP was established in 2010 as an oil and
gas exploration and production company with a focus on East Texas
non-operated working interests.  Specifically, the Debtor owns
approximately 63,000 net acres in the established Woodbine sands
and Austin Chalk formations throughout Polk, Tyler, and Jasper
counties.

The Debtor's current net production is approximately 3,000 boe/d
comprised of 43.5% oil and 56.5% rich gas from approximately 164
wells (27 vertical Woodbine wells and 137 horizontal Austin Chalk
wells).  The Debtor's working interests are primarily operated by
its non-debtor affiliate BBX Operating, LLC.

Trinity River filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Case No. 16-10472) on April 21, 2016.  The petition was signed
by Matthew J. Telfer as manager of Trinity River Resources, GP,
LLC.  The Debtor estimated assets in the range of $50 million to
$100 million and liabilities of up to $500 million.

The Debtor has hired Bracewell LLP as counsel, Bridgepoint
Consulting, LLC, as financial advisor, and Scotiabank as investment
banker.

Judge Tony M. Davis is assigned to the case.


UPRIGHT SHORING: Hires Fischer Auction to Sell Equipment
--------------------------------------------------------
UpRight Shoring & Scaffold, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California to employ
Fischer Auction Co., Inc. as auctioneer to the Debtor.

UpRight Shoring requires Fischer Auction to complete the
liquidation of the debtor-in-possession's shoring and scaffolding
equipment.

Fischer Auction will be paid 25% of gross sales as commission.

Jeff L. Bloom, of Fischer Auction Co., Inc., assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Fischer Auction can be reached at:

     Jeff L. Bloom
     FISCHER AUCTION CO., INC.
     1426 N. Magnolia
     El Cajon, CA 92020
     Tel: (619) 590-2828
     Fax: (619) 590-2828

                     About UpRight Shoring

UpRight Shoring and Scaffold, Inc., based in Chula Vista, CA, filed
a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 15-00717) on
February 6, 2015. The Hon. Christopher B. Latham presides over the
case. Michael T. O'Halloran, Esq., at the Law Office of Michael T.
O'halloran, as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Mary Olivo,
president.


UWAGBOE O. ORU-LAWRENCE: UST Wants Ch. 11 Trustee Named
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee is asking the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts to enter an order appointing a Chapter 11
trustee in the case of Uwagboe O. Oru-Lawrence.  Upon a review of
the Court's docket, including the Debtor's petition, forms and
schedules, amendments to same, the motions for relief from stay,
the Debtor's response, and the order allowing same, the Debtor's
Third Amended Disclosure Statement and Plan, the objections to
same, and the UST's motion to convert the case to Chapter 7,
stipulation and agreed order and certificate of non-compliance, the
U.S. Trustee asserts that the Court should order the appointment of
a trustee for "cause" per 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1104(a)(1).

William K. Harrington, U.S. Trustee for Region 1, is represented
by:

           Paula R.C. Bachtell
           U.S. Department of Justice
           John W. McCormack Courthouse and Post Office
           5 Post Office Square, Suite 1000
           Boston, MA 02109
           Tel: (617) 565-6368
           E-mail: paula.bachtell@usdoj.gov

Counsel to the Debtor:

           Timothy M. Mauser, Esq.
           LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTNHY MAUSER, ESQ.
           10 Liberty Street, Suite 410
           Danvers, MA 01923
           Tel: (617) 338-9080
           Fax: (617) 275-8990
           E-mail: tmauser@mauserlaw.com

The case is In re Uwagboe O. Oru-Lawrence (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No.
13-17250) filed Dec. 19, 2013.


VIDALIA PLANTATION: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Vidalia Plantation, Inc.
        1652 Ronny Collins Road
        Cobbtown, GA 30420

Case No.: 16-60299

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2016

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Georgia (Statesboro)

Debtor's Counsel: James L Drake, Jr., Esq.
                  JAMES L. DRAKE, JR. P.C.
                  P. O. Box 9945
                  Savannah, GA 31412
                  Tel: 912-790-1533
                  E-mail: jdrake7@bellsouth.net

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Debts: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Ronald A. Collins, president/CEO.

The Debtor did not include a list of its largest unsecured
creditors when it filed the petition.


VILLAGE CONCEPTS: Katz's 3rd-Party Complaint Dismissed, Case Closed
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Kimberly J. Mueller of the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of California granted third-party plaintiff
Brian Katz's motion to dismiss without prejudice his third-party
complaint captioned DAVID FLEMMER, in his capacity as Trustee for
the Bankruptcy Estate of Village Concepts, Inc., Plaintiff, v.
ZENAIDA O. NEWELL a.k.a. ZANDEE NEWELL, MARIANNE NEWELL, and BRIAN
R. KATZ, in his capacity as Successor Trustee for the Harold O.
Newell Revocable Trust, Defendants. BRIAN R. KATZ, in his capacity
as Successor Trustee for the Harold O. Newell Revocable Trust,
Counter-Claimant, v. DAVID FLEMMER, in his capacity as Chapter 7
Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Village Concepts, Inc.,
Counter-Defendant. BRIAN R. KATZ, in his capacity as Successor
Trustee for the Harold O. Newell Revocable Trust, Third Party
Plaintiff/Cross-Claimant. v. MARK WEINER, NANCY WEINER, SUSANVILLE
VILLAGE LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Third Party
Defendants, No. 2:14-cv-00021-KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal.), relating to In
re VILLAGE CONCEPTS, INC., Debtor.

The court's dismissal of Katz's third-party complaint, following
the court's approval of David Flemmer's and Katz's stipulation to
dismiss the claims between them, resolved all claims in the suit
and the case was closed.

A full-text copy of Judge Mueller's June 24, 2016 order is
available at https://is.gd/lwpCiq from Leagle.com.

Brian R. Katz, Marianne Newell, Zenaida O. Newell are represented
by:

          Thomas Richard Phinney, Esq.
          PARKINSON PHINNEY
          400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2560
          Sacramento, CA 95814
          Tel: (916)449-1444
          Fax: (916)449-1440
          Email: tom@parkinsonphinney.com

Mark Weiner is represented by:

          Michael W. Thomas, Esq.
          THOMAS & ASSOCIATES
          2390 Professional Drive
          Roseville, CA 95661
          Tel: (916)789-1201
          Fax: (916)789-1202
          Email: mthomas@thomas-lawyers.com

            -- and –-

          David Weiner, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF DAVID WEINER
          3350 Country Club Drive, Suite 202
          Cameron Park, CA 95682
          Tel: (530)677-9487
          Fax: (530)677-2955

Nancy Weiner, Susanville Village, LLC, Mark Weiner, Nancy Weiner
are represented by:

          David Weiner, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF DAVID WEINER
          3350 Country Club Drive, Suite 202
          Cameron Park, CA 95682
          Tel: (530)677-9487
          Fax: (530)677-2955

David Flemmer is represented by:

          J. Russell Cunningham, Esq.
          Jeremy Luke Hendrix, Esq.
          DESMOND NOLAN LIVAICH & CUNNINGHAM
          15th & S Building
          1830 15th Street
          Sacramento, CA 95811
          Tel: (916)443-2051
          Fax: (916)443-2651
          Email: rcunningham@dnlc.net
                 jhendrix@dnlc.net


VISION ADVENTURES: Court Vacates Griffin, Davis Default Judgment
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the adversary proceeding captioned Joseph M. DiOrio, Chapter 7
Trustee of Vision Adventures, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Linda K. Davis
Griffin and Shirley Davis, Defendants, A.P. No. 15-01006 (Bankr.
D.R.I.), Judge Diane Finkle of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Rhode Island, granted a motion to vacate
default as to both defendants, Linda K. Davis Griffin and Shirley
Davis.

Vision Adventures, LLC's Chapter 7 trustee, Joseph M. DiOrio,
sought entry of a default judgment against Griffin and Davis after
entry of default against them for failure to file an answer, or
other responsive pleading to the complaint commencing the adversary
proceeding.  Essentially, the defendants sought to vacate the
default and object to the entry of a default judgment against them,
justifying their failure to respond to the complaint by relying on
a blanket assertion of their Fifth Amendment privilege against
self-incrimination because of a criminal case they allege is
pending before the "United States District Court" relating to
transactions similar to those alleged in the complaint.

After careful review of the record and the various related filings
by the parties, Judge Finkle concluded that the defendants have
shown just cause to warrant vacating the default entered against
them, although their reliance on a blanket invocation of the
privilege to avoid responding to the complaint is misplaced. Judge
Finkle, however, afforded the defendants one last chance to
properly file a formal answer to the complaint in light of their
pro se status and what the judge believed is their sincere but
mistaken belief that merely citing to this privilege would relieve
them of the requirement to file a formal answer to the complaint.

The bankruptcy case is In re: Vision Adventures, LLC, Chapter 7,
Debtor, BK No. 13-10660 (Bankr. D.R.I.).

A full-text copy of Judge Finkle's June 25, 2016 decision and order
is available at https://is.gd/JCJdwN from Leagle.com.

Joseph M. DiOrio is represented by:

          Kristen Leigh Forbes, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH M. DIORIO
          144 Westminster Street, Suite 302
          Providence, RI 02903
          Tel: (401)632-0911
          Email: klforbes@dioriolaw.com


WATERFORD FUNDING: Default Judgment vs Stone Vacated
----------------------------------------------------
In the adversary proceeding captioned Gil A. Miller, as the Chapter
11 Trustee, Waterford Funding, LLC, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. John D.
Stone, Defendant, Adversary Proceeding No. 11-2093 (Bankr. D.
Utah), Judge R. Kimball Mosier of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Utah concluded that the default judgment
against the defendant is void and should be vacated.

Judge Mosier found that through a chance event, the summons and
complaint did reach the defendant, giving him actual notice of the
proceeding.  "However, a chance event cannot confer jurisidiction
upon this Court to enter a default judgment," said the judge.

The bankruptcy case is In re: Waterford Funding, LLC, et al.,
Chapter 11 Debtors, Bankruptcy Number: 09-22584 (Bankr. D. Utah).

A full-text copy of Judge Mosier's June 30, 2016 order is available
at https://is.gd/ssck4s from Leagle.com.

                    About Waterford Funding

Based in Salt Lake City, Utah, Waterford Funding, LLC --
http://www.waterfordfunding.com/-- specialized in solving the     
short-term cash flow problems of new, early-stage and established
commercial enterprises through real-estate based loans.  Waterford
Funding and Waterford Loan Fund filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
(Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 09-22584 and 09-22583) on March 20, 2009.

James W. Anderson, Esq., at Miller Guymon, PC, served as the
Debtors' counsel.  Waterford Loan Fund's petition estimated
$1 million to $10 million in assets, and $50 million to
$100 million in debts.

Affiliates Waterford Services LLC, Waterford Candwich LLC,
Waterford Perdido LLC, and Investment Recovery, L.C., also sought
Chapter 11 protection.

On Jan. 5, 2010, the Court approved the resignation of Daniel A.
Scarlet as Chief Restructuring Officer and the appointment of Gil
A. Miller as the Chapter 11 Trustee.

In January 2011, the Bankruptcy Court granted the Chapter 11
Trustee's request for substantive consolidation as of March 20,
2009, of the Debtors' cases.

The Chapter 11 Trustee is represented by Peggy Hunt, Esq., Benjamin
J. Kotter, Esq., AND Paul J. Justensen, Esq., at Dorsey & Whitney
LLP, in Salt Lake City, Utah.  


WHITEWAVE FOODS: Moody's Puts Ba2 CFR on Review for Upgrade
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed the ratings of Whitewave Foods Co.
including its Ba2 Corporate Family Rating, on review for upgrade.
This follows the announcement that Danone (Baa1 stable) has signed
a definitive merger agreement to acquire Whitewave Foods for $56.25
per share in cash, representing a total enterprise value of $12.5
billion, including debt and certain other liabilities. The
transaction represents a 24% premium over Whitewave's 30 day
average share price and represents a multiple of more than 21 times
consensus expectations for its 2016 EBITDA. Danone has stated that
it expects to realize $300 million of EBIT synergies by 2020.
Moody's believes that the post-acquisition entity will be a
stronger credit than Whitewave Foods on a stand-alone basis.
WhiteWave's ratings will be withdrawn if its debt is fully repaid
as part of the transaction, which is expected to close by calendar
year end 2016.

The following ratings were placed on review for upgrade:

Corporate Family Rating at Ba2;

Probability of Default rating at Ba2-PD;

$500mm GTD Senior Unsecured Notes due 2022 at B1;

Senior Unsecured Shelf rating at (P)B1;

The following rating is affirmed:

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating at SGL-2.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Whitewave's existing Ba2 Corporate Family Rating reflects the
company's leading presence in small but rapidly growing food &
beverage categories, and its moderate size yet rapidly-growing
revenue base. The rating is also supported by WhiteWave's good
product diversification and innovation track record, and healthy
operating cash flow. The rating is constrained by the company's
moderately high leverage, and low profitability for a packaged
consumer business. Ratings also reflect WhiteWave's ambitious
acquisition strategy and associated integration risk as well as
risks related to supply of organic ingredients. Ratings are also
constrained by significant growth capital spending which will
result in thin or negative free cash flow.

WhiteWave Foods Company, based in Denver, Colorado, is a consumer
packaged food and beverage company focused on high-growth product
categories. It manufactures, markets, and distributes branded
plant-based foods and beverages, coffee creamers and beverages,
premium dairy and organic greens and produce throughout North
America and Europe. LTM sales for the period ended in March, 2015
totaled approximately $4.0 billion.

Danone is a Paris-based diversified food and beverage company and
the world leader in fresh dairy products. Danone's annual revenues
exceed EUR 22 billion.


WIRECO WORLDGROUP: S&P Raises CCR to 'B', Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it raised its corporate credit rating on
Prairie Village, Kansas-based WireCo WorldGroup Inc. to 'B' from
'B-'.  The outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P assigned its 'B+' issue-level rating and '2'
recovery rating to the company's proposed $410 million first-lien
term loan due 2023.  The '2' recovery rating indicates S&P's
expectation for substantial (70% to 90%; at the lower end of the
range) recovery in the event of a payment default.  S&P also
assigned its 'B-' issue-level rating and '5' recovery rating to the
company's proposed $185 million second-lien term loan due 2024.
The '5' recovery rating indicates S&P's expectation for modest (10%
to 30%; at the upper end of the range) recovery in the event of a
payment default.

"The stable outlook reflects our view that despite the current
weakness in the company's oil and gas, mining, and industrial end
markets, we expect WireCo's credit measures to remain at the
stronger end of our highly leveraged financial risk assessment over
the next 12 months," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Michael
Maggi.  "Specifically, for the full year 2016, we expect adjusted
debt to EBITDA to be between 6x and 6.5x, with modest improvement
in 2017.  We also expect EBITDA interest coverage to rise above
1.5x in 2016, but remain slightly below 2x in 2017."

If the proposed transaction and refinancing does not close by
Aug. 31, 2016, it is highly likely S&P would lower its rating on
WireCo to the 'CCC' category given the company's Feb. 15, 2017 debt
maturity.  After the closing, S&P could lower the ratings if
weakness in WireCo's end markets (especially oil and gas and
mining) were to worsen materially following the recent
stabilization, pressuring its operating results further and pushing
adjusted debt to EBITDA above 8x on a sustained basis.  S&P could
also take a negative rating action if the company's EBITDA margins
weakened due to a shifting product mix and/or loss of market
share.

S&P views an upgrade over the next 12 months as unlikely given the
company's highly leveraged financial risk profile, weak business
risk profile, and the current outlook for WireCo's key end markets.
S&P could consider an upgrade if adjusted debt to EBITDA was
sustained below 5x on a combination of cash flow growth and further
debt reduction. This would also likely be associated with a
commitment from WireCo's financial sponsors to maintain leverage
below this level in order for S&P to revise its view of the
company's financial policy.


YP HOLDINGS: S&P Cuts CCR to 'CCC+' on Weakening Credit Metrics
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it lowered its corporate credit rating
on U.S. marketing solutions provider YP Holdings LLC to 'CCC+' from
'B'.  The rating outlook is negative.

At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level rating on YP LLC's
senior secured term loan due 2018 to 'CCC+' from 'B'.  The '4'
recovery rating remains unchanged, indicating S&P's expectation for
average recovery (30%-50%; upper half of the range) of principal in
the event of a payment default.  YP LLC, a subsidiary of YP
Holdings, and Print Media LLC, an independent business affiliate,
are coborrowers and cross-guarantors of YP Holdings' credit
facilities.

The downgrade reflects S&P's view that YP Holdings and its
affiliate Print Media (collectively referred to as "YP") are
vulnerable to refinancing risk in 2018 and dependent on favorable
business, financial, and economic conditions to meet their
financial commitments.  YP's financial commitments appear to be
unsustainable for the next two years, given the acceleration of
unfavorable secular trends in its print business, the
weaker-than-expected operating performance in its digital business,
the sharp expected declines in its cash flow generation and debt
repayments, its rising debt leverage and meaningful debt maturities
in June 2018, and its near-term covenant amendment requirement.

Absent a financial maintenance covenant amendment, YP could breach
its senior secured term loan leverage covenant for the Sept. 30,
2016, reporting period when the covenant steps down to 1.2x from
1.4x. An event of default under the credit agreement could trigger
45 days after a reporting period, subject to an additional 10-day
equity cure period.  The company's sponsors (Cerberus Capital
Management L.P. and AT&T Inc.) are allowed two equity cures in any
four fiscal quarter periods, up to five times in the aggregate.
Although S&P believes YP will likely amend its term loan agreement
to obtain covenant relief before Sept. 30, the amendment process is
taking longer than we expect.  The covenant amendment will likely
include, among other things, interest rate increases for the
asset-based loan (ABL) revolving credit facility (unrated) and the
senior secured term loan.

S&P's corporate credit rating on YP reflects S&P's assessment of
the company's business risk profile as vulnerable, which is based
on the print business' accelerated rate of structural decline, and
its financial profile as highly leveraged, which is based on the
potential for rapid decline and high volatility in revenue, EBITDA,
and cash flow.  S&P expects adjusted leverage, which includes its
operating lease and pension adjustment, to rise to the mid- to
high-2x area in 2017 from the low-2x area in 2016.

YP has a large presence in the U.S. print and online advertising
markets through its yellow pages print directories and online and
mobile local-search and marketing solutions.  To improve its legacy
print yellow pages business' and its digital advertising and
marketing businesses' financials and business transparency, YP
Holdings separated its print yellow pages business into Print Media
in 2015 and spun-off the new company to its shareholders.  YP
Holdings reorganized its digital business into its YP LLC
subsidiary.  Print Media and YP LLC are coborrowers and
cross-guarantors of YP's credit facilities.  S&P's analysis
reflects both companies' consolidated credit measures.

In 2015, YP's print business revenues declined about 22.5%, and S&P
expects the rate of decline to accelerate in 2016 and 2017 due to
organic declines and title reductions.  Given the significantly
greater-than-expected declines in revenues and cash flow, S&P views
the company's stand-alone print business (Print Media) as
economically unviable.  S&P expects YP's print business EBITDA
margins to decline to the mid-single-digit percentage area by 2017
from the low-20% area in 2015.  S&P also expects discretionary cash
flow to remain slightly positive due to a sharp reduction in
working capital, and S&P now believes the print business will
wind-down over the next three to four years.

YP's digital business generated almost $1 billion in revenues in
2015 (excluding affiliate transactions) and provides digital
marketing products and solutions for small and midsize business
advertisers.  The digital business has about 60 million monthly
unique visitors to its online and mobile Web sites, about 3,300
sales professionals, and approximately 225,000 digital advertisers.
However, despite the company's scale, revenue growth at YP's
digital business has been anemic since 2010, and S&P believes the
company has lost market share while the broader industry has had a
continuous annual growth rate of more than 10%. Furthermore, S&P
now expects revenue to decline in 2016 and 2017 due to intense
competition, sharp declines in search listings, and contractions in
the print business, which was a key source of new business leads,
combined with expected declines in the sales force.

Furthermore, S&P is skeptical that YP can turnaround performance in
its digital segment and sharply improve sales productivity.  S&P
views the online local search and advertising markets as intensely
competitive and influenced by large industry participants, such as
Google Inc. and Facebook Inc., which have significant technological
expertise and financial resources. Furthermore, despite S&P's
expectations for strong growth for the online marketing services
industry, the industry segment is highly fragmented and subject to
intense competition and price pressure from existing and new
participants.

Despite low forecasted leverage in 2016 and positive cash flow
generation, S&P views YP's financial risk profile as highly
leveraged.  S&P's assessment is based on the low probability, in
our view, that the company will return to stable EBITDA and cash
flow generation over the next two years.

Under S&P's base-case scenario, it expects these:

   -- Revenue will decline at a mid-teens percentage rate annually

      in 2016 and 2017, with print revenues declining to the high-
      20% area and digital revenue declining to the mid-single-
      digit percentage area; and

   -- EBITDA margin will contract to the mid-teens area by 2017
      from a low-20% level in 2015.

Based on S&P's assumptions, it expects adjusted debt to EBITDA to
remain below 3x over the next 18 months and free operating cash
flow to debt to decline to a low-teens percentage range.

                             OUTLOOK

The negative rating outlook reflects S&P's view that YP's financial
commitments appear unsustainable for the next two years, although
S&P don't expect a default over the next 12 months.  The outlook
also incorporates S&P's assumption that the company could face
difficulties in refinancing the June 2018 asset-based revolving
credit facility and senior secured term loan maturities, which
could lead to a payment default.

S&P could lower its corporate credit rating on YP to 'CCC' or lower
if the company fails to obtain covenant relief before
Sept. 30, 2016, if it fails to make meaningful progress by mid- to
late 2017 on its debt refinancing needs, if its operating
performance declines faster than we expect, or if S&P become
convinced that a default or distressed exchange is likely within 12
months.

An upgrade would primarily depend on a favorable reassessment of
the company's digital business.  For an upgrade, YP would need to
demonstrate overall stabilization and growth in revenue, profit,
and free cash flow generation.  An upgrade would also require a
refinancing of 2018 debt maturities.


[*] Moody's: LSI Eases to 8.7% in June, Signals Rising Defaults
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Liquidity-Stress Index (LSI) eased to 8.7% in June from
9.3% in May, the rating agency said in its most recent edition of
SGL Monitor Flash.  While the index has declined since its recent
peak at 10.3% in March, when Moody's concluded its review of
ratings in the energy sector, it remains above its long-term
average and continues to signal rising defaults among US
speculative-grade companies.

Moody's forecasts that the US speculative-grade default rate will
peak at 6.5% in November, up from 5.2% currently, before settling
back to 5.3% a year from now.

"Most of the recent decline in the LSI is due to defaults and
distressed exchanges, but some companies benefited from the pick-up
in debt issuance in the second quarter," said Moody's Senior Vice
President John Puchalla.  "The level of downgrade activity has also
slowed since we concluded our broad review of energy company
ratings."

In June, there were 10 SGL rating upgrades and seven downgrades,
marking the first full month in which upgrades have outnumbered
downgrades since June 2015.  Last month, four energy-related
companies were upgraded, and four companies were upgraded from
Moody's lowest liquidity rating, SGL-4.  While upgrades occurred in
the energy and media sectors, downgrades were dispersed across
industries, with just one in energy; the SGL rating of oil field
services firm Seitel, Inc. was lowered to SGL-3.


[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings
-------------------------------------------------------
In re AF Lewis Enterprises, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 16-02190
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/alsb16-02190.pdf
         represented by: Lawrence B. Voit, Esq.
                         SILVER, VOIT & THOMPSON P.C.
                         E-mail: lvoit@silvervoit.com

In re Jeffrey Scott McCombs and Ana Maria McCombs
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-11254
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         represented by: Reed H Olmstead, Esq.
                         HURLBETT & OLMSTEAD
                         E-mail: reed@olmstead.law

In re William J. Kardash, Sr.
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-05715
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         represented by: Alberto F Gomez, Jr., Esq.
                         JOHNSON POPE BOKOR RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP
                         Email: al@jpfirm.com

In re Words of Restoration International Ministries Church of God
in Christ, Inc.
   Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 16-10790
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/gamb16-10790.pdf
         represented by: Kenneth W. Revell, Esq.
                         ZALKIN REVELL, PLLC
                         E-mail: krevell@zalkinrevell.com

In re Judith Lyon Enterprises, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 16-61566
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb16-61566.pdf
         represented by: Joel Aldrich Jothan Callins, Esq.
                         THE CALLINS LAW FIRM, LLC
                         E-mail: jcallins@callins.com

In re Paul Christian Uhl and Barbara Ann Stanley
   Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 16-21545
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         represented by: Matthew L Stone, Esq.
                         SCHNEIDER & STONE
                         E-mail: mstone@windycitylawgroup.com

In re Khanh Van Tong and Thuy Luu Tong
   Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 16-21262
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         represented by: George J. Thomas, Esq.
                         E-mail: geojthomas@gmail.com

In re Jacqueline S. Pemberton and Calvin J. Pemberton
   Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 16-18967
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         represented by: Morgan William Fisher, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF MORGAN FISHER LLC
                         E-mail: bk@morganfisherlaw.com

In re Hamrid Hamrah
   Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 16-44747
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         represented by: Thomas H. Riske, Esq.
                         DESAI EGGMANN MASON LLC
                         E-mail: triske@demlawllc.com

In re C. E. Willie Funeral & Cremation Services, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 16-03448
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nceb16-03448.pdf
         represented by: Douglas Q. Wickham, Esq.
                         HATCH, LITTLE & BUNN, LLP
                         Email: dqwickham@hatchlittlebunn.com

In re Thad Michael Lancaster
   Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 16-03471
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         represented by: Trawick H Stubbs, Jr., Esq.
                         STUBBS & PERDUE, P.A.
                         E-mail: efile@stubbsperdue.com

In re Jacob Canales
   Bankr. D.N.M. Case No. 16-11676
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         represented by: James Clay Hume, Esq.
                         HUME LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: James@hume-law-firm.com

In re Anchorage New York LLC
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-42974
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb16-42974.pdf
         represented by: Ehsanul Habib, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF EHSANUL HABIB
                         E-mail: ehsanulhbb@yahoo.com

In re Jorge Azize Ortiz
   Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-05338
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         represented by: Alexis Fuentes Hernandez, Esq.
                         FUENTES LAW OFFICES, LLC
                         E-mail: alex@fuentes-law.com

In re Office Express Supply Inc
   Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-05304
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb16-05304.pdf
         represented by: Jorge R Collazo Sanchez, Esq.
                         COLLAZO SANCHEZ LAW OFFICE
                         E-mail: coa@prtc.net

In re Boulevard Entertainment Greenville, LLC
   Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 16-03313
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/scb16-03313.pdf
         represented by: Robert H. Cooper, Esq.
                         THE COOPER LAW FIRM
                     E-mail: thecooperlawfirm@thecooperlawfirm.com

In re Leeper Enterprises, Inc.
   Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 16-04755
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnmb16-04755.pdf
         represented by: Steven L. Lefkovitz, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES LEFKOVITZ & LEFKOVITZ
                         E-mail: slefkovitz@lefkovitz.com

In re Pace IV, LLC
   Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 16-41203
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb16-41203.pdf
          represented by: Eric A. Liepins , Esq.
                          ERIC A. LIEPINS P.C.
                          E-mail: eric@ealpc.com

In re Irvin & Associates, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 16-32634
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb16-32634.pdf
         represented by: Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
                         JOYCE W. LINDAUER ATTORNEY, PLLC
                         E-mail: joyce@joycelindauer.com

In re Maso Suites, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 16-70281
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 1, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb16-70281.pdf
         represented by: Jose Luis Flores, Esq.
                         E-mail: bklaw@jlfloreslawfirm.com

In re Munhyeon Ro and Jeong Hee Ro
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 16-51961
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 2, 2016
         represented by: Lars T. Fuller, Esq.
                         THE FULLER LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: Fullerlawfirmecf@aol.com

In re Thomas S Chae
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 16-61670
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 2, 2016
         represented by: Michael D. Robl, Esq.
                         THE SPEARS & ROBL LAW FIRM, LLC
                         E-mail: mdrobl@tsrlaw.com

In re Raphael Toledo and Mayra Toledo
   Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 16-19422
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 3, 2016
         represented by: Susan D. Lasky, Esq.
                         E-mail: ECF@suelasky.com

In re The Pawza, LLC
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 16-33345
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 3, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb16-33345.pdf
         represented by: William G. Harris, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM G. HARRIS
                         E-mail: wgh@wgharrislaw.com

In re John M. Carroll, III
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-11261
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         represented by: William C Beall, Esq.
                         BEALL AND BURKHARDT, APC
                         E-mail: will@beallandburkhardt.com

In re CA Small Residential Investors Club, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 16-41876
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         Filed Pro Se

In re Cooper, Inc.
   Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 16-11235
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/ksb16-11235.pdf
         represented by: Michael J. Studtmann, Esq.
                         THE LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J STUDTMANN
                         E-mail: Michael@studtmannlaw.com

In re ACMD Holding Corp.
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-72994
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb16-72994.pdf
         represented by: Anthony J Gallo, Esq.
                         AJ GALLO ASSOCIATES, P.C.
                         E-mail: gallobk@ajgalloassociates.com

In re Joseph Babad LLC
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-22912
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb16-22912.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Kono Co
   Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-10643
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb16-10643.pdf
         represented by: John F. Kroto, Esq.
                         KNOX MCLAUGHLIN GORNALL & SENNETT
                         E-mail: jkroto@kmgslaw.com

In re The Tempest Group
   Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-70496
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb16-70496.pdf
         represented by: Robert O Lampl, Esq.
                         E-mail: rol@lampllaw.com

In re Carlos & Carla, LLC
   Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 16-32700
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb16-32700.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Travis Ray Phillips
   Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 16-10787
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         represented by: Ray Fisher, Esq.
                         FISHER LAW OFFICES
                         E-mail: rayfisherlaw@gmail.com

In re Thomas R. Gallagher
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 16-72355
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         represented by: W. Greer McCreedy, II, Esq.
                         The McCreedy Law Group, PLLC
                         E-mail: McCreedy@McCreedylaw.com

In re Nicholas T Jordan and Jeanne A Jordan
   Bankr. E.D. Wis. Case No. 16-26805
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 5, 2016
         represented by: Derek H. Goodman, Esq.
                         THE LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN GOODMAN
                         E-mail: derek@jgoodmanlaw.com

In re Jimmie L. Sundstrom
   Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-22917
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 6, 2016
         represented by: H. Bruce Bronson, Jr., Esq.
                         BRONSON LAW OFFICES, P.C.
                         E-mail: ecf@bronsonlaw.net

In re Norma Aqui
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-18956
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 6, 2016
         represented by: Onyinye N Anyama, Esq.
                         ANYAMA LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: onyi@anyamalaw.com

In re Joseph Patrick Walsh and Kimberlee Reddell Walsh
   Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 16-41898
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 6, 2016
         represented by: R. Kenneth Bauer, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF R. KENNETH BAUER
                         E-mail: rkbauerlaw@gmail.com

In re Steven Padilla
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-02568
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 6, 2016
         represented by: Jason A Burgess, Esq.
                         THE LAW OFFICES OF JASON A. BURGESS, LLC
                         E-mail: jason@jasonaburgess.com

In re H.L.B. Universal Enterprises, Inc.
   Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 16-61813
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 6, 2016
         Filed Pro Se

In re Claudia A. Mancini
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 16-23040
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 6, 2016
         represented by: Michele M. Dudas, Esq.
                         TRENK, DIPASQUALE, DELLA FERA & SODONO
                         E-mail: mdudas@trenklawfirm.com

In re Luke's Incorporated
   Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 16-03362
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 6, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/scb16-03362.pdf
         represented by: Robert H. Cooper, Esq.
                         THE COOPER LAW FIRM
                         E-mail:
thecooperlawfirm@thecooperlawfirm.com

In re Rodney Jay Stalvey
   Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 16-03370
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 6, 2016
         represented by: Kevin Campbell, Esq.
                         E-mail: kcampbell@campbell-law-firm.com

In re Gholam H. Kowkabi and Karen Wilkinson Kowkabi
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 16-12338
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 6, 2016
         represented by: Matthew Carmen Indrisano, Esq.
                         ALLRED, BACON, HALFHILL & YOUNG, P.C.
                         E-mail: mindrisano@abhylaw.com

In re Roger Allen McCracken
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 16-13561
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 6, 2016
         represented by: Jamie J McFarlane, Esq.
                         THE TRACY LAW GROUP PLLC
                         E-mail: jamie@thetracylawgroup.com
In re Mohr Coffee, LLC
   Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 16-07749
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 7, 2016
         Filed Pro Se

In re Samuel James Esworthy
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-11985
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 7, 2016
         represented by: M Jonathan Hayes, Esq.
                         SIMON RESNIK HAYES LLP
                         E-mail: jhayes@srhlawfirm.com

In re Michael Edward Favreau
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-12856
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 7, 2016
         represented by: Garrick A Hollander, Esq.
                         WINTHROP COUCHOT
                         E-mail: ghollander@winthropcouchot.com

In re Pacific West Development LLC
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-16081
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 7, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb16-16081.pdf
         represented by: Gene E O'Brien, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF GENE E O'BRIEN
                         E-mail: gene@geneobrienlaw.com

In re David Whitney
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 16-51984
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 7, 2016
         represented by: Nancy Weng, Esq.
                         TRINH LAW
                         E-mail: nweng@trinhlawfirm.com

In re Gaetano Trust
   Bankr. D. Haw. Case No. 16-00719
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 7, 2016
         represented by: Bruce R. Lewis, Esq.
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/hib16-00719.pdf
                         E-mail: offshoreglobal@gmail.com

In re James P Jordan, Jr.
   Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 16-12605
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 7, 2016
         represented by: Marques C Lipton, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF NICHOLAS F. ORTIZ, P.C.
                         E-mail: mcl@mass-legal.com

In re Dimitrios A. Tingas and Thessalia D Tingas
   Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 16-49700
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 7, 2016
         represented by: Edward J. Gudeman, Esq.
                         GUDEMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
                         E-mail: ejgudeman@gudemanlaw.com

In re Roddrick Dshawn Jenkins, Sr. and Judith Brown Jenkins
   Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 16-72383
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 7, 2016
         Filed Pro Se

In re Mikey and Sunshine Inc.
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 16-13574
      Chapter 11 Petition filed July 7, 2016
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb16-13574.pdf
         represented by: Emily A Jarvis, Esq.
                         WELLS AND JARVIS, P.S.
                         E-mail: emily@wellsandjarvis.co


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2016.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***