TCR_Public/151019.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, October 19, 2015, Vol. 19, No. 292

                            Headlines

22ND CENTURY: Announces Research Collaboration with Anandia
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES: Reports 2015 Third Quarter Results
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES: Signs Equity Purchase Pact with Nantong
AFFIRMATIVE INSURANCE: Chapter 11 Filings Trigger Default
ALEXZA PHARMACEUTICALS: Updates on ADASUVE Commercial Activities

ALROSE ALLEGRIA: Creditors Have Until Dec. 29 to File Claims
AMBROSE CONSTRUCTION: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
AMERICAN APPAREL: Describes Survival Plan to Bankruptcy Judge
AMERICAN COMMERCE: Incurs $55,000 Net Loss in Second Quarter
AMERICAN LIBERTY: Seeks Lender Entity Substitution With Veranda

ANNA'S LINENS: Court Approves Sale of Store Leases
ANTHONY LAWRENCE: Case Summary & 13 Largest Unsecured Creditors
APOLLO MEDICAL: Board Amends Bylaws
APOLLO MEDICAL: Names Warren Hosseinion as Secretary
ASBH INC: Moody's Assigns '(P)Ba1' Corporate Family Rating

AXION INTERNATIONAL: GBQ Partners Replaces BDO as Accountants
BERNARD L. MADOFF: Jury Told E&Y's Negligence Led to $128M Loss
BLACK ELK: Gets Approval to Use Cash Collateral Until Oct. 28
BLUE EAGLE: S&P Assigns 'B' CCR & Rates $540MM 1st Lien Loan 'B+'
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Creditor Group Calls Plan Flawed

CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Gibbons to Testify on $18M Showboat Deal
CALMARE THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $1-Mil. Net Loss in First Quarter
CANCER GENETICS: Closes Acquisition of Response Genetics
CAPITAL INVESTMENTS: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
CASH STORE: Chapter 15 Case Summary

CASH STORE: Seeks U.S. Recognition of Canadian Proceeding
CATASYS INC: Sells 6.7 Million Shares to Acuitas, et al.
CCNG ENERGY: Court Extends Deadline to File Schedules Until Nov. 9
CCNG ENERGY: Court Orders Joint Administration of Cases
CCNG ENERGY: Dismissal of Operating Subsidiaries' Cases Sought

CCNG ENERGY: Joint Administration of Cases Opposed
CCNG ENERGY: Section 341 Meeting Scheduled for Dec. 3
CCNG ENERGY: Wants to Use Guggenheim's Cash Collateral
CEETOP INC: Stops Operations of Hangzhou Tuoyin Unit
CENTRAL AMERICA BOTTLING: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' IDR, Outlook Stable

CHOA DAYTON: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
COMMUNITY ACADEMY: S&P Raises Rating on 2007 Revenue Bonds to 'BB+'
DAYBREAK OIL: Posts $569,000 Net Loss for Second Quarter
DDR CORP: Fitch Assigns 'BB' Preferred Stock Rating
DOMARK INTERNATIONAL: Needs More Time to File Aug. 31 Form 10-Q

ELBIT IMAGING: Repurchases Notes for NIS5.24M
ENERGY & EXPLORATION: In Debt Discussions with Lenders
ENERGY FUTURE: Judge to Limit Time in Plan Confirmation Hearing
ENERGY FUTURE: Texas Regulator Seeks Answers Over Oncor Sale
EXPORTHER BONDED: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

FIRST DATA: Registers 180.5 Million Shares for Employee Plans
FIRST EAGLE: S&P Assigns 'BB+' LT Issuer Credit Rating
FISKER AUTOMOTIVE: Execs Lose Second Bid to Escape Investors' Suit
FRESH & EASY: Reportedly Preparing for Bankruptcy
FRESH & EASY: Said to Prepare for Bankruptcy Filing

GENERAL MOTORS: Victims' Atty Says Punitives Have 'Biblical' Goal
GLOBAL MARITIME: U.S. Trustee Forms Three-Member Committee
GLYECO INC: Names Maria Tellez Interim Chief Financial Officer
GREAT ATLANTIC: 3500 Aramingo Alleges ROFO Violation
GREAT ATLANTIC: Seeks $11.75-Mil. Lease Sale to Food Bazaar

GREAT ATLANTIC: Seeks Approval of Wakefern Lease Sale Agreement
GREYSTONE LOGISTICS: Delays Aug. 31 Form 10-Q Over Limited Staff
GUADALUPE REGIONAL: Fitch Assigns 'BB' Rating on $119.5MM Bonds
HAGGEN HOLDINGS: Wants Trade Deal Settling $15M Claim Approved
HEI INC: Plan of Liquidation Declared Effective

HOVENSA LLC: Gets Final Approval to Tap $40 Million Financing
HUTCHESON MEDICAL: Trustee to Auction Fort Oglethorpe Hospital
INTELLIPHARMACEUTICS INT'L: Presented at Dawson James Conference
JONES ENERGY: S&P Affirms 'B' CCR Then Withdraws Rating
KHALIDI PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 4 Largest Unsecured Creditors

LANNETT CO: S&P Assigns 'B+' CCR & Rates Proposed Facility 'B+'
LEA POWER: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' Rating on $252.6MM Sr. Sec. Notes
LIFE PARTNERS: FIFC to Finance Purchase of Insurance Policies
MALIBU LIGHTING: Oct. 20 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
MIDWAY GOLD: Subsidiary Seeks Authorization to Sell Spring Valley

MONAKER GROUP: Incurs $1.11 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
MOUNTAIN PROVINCE: Appoints Vice President Diamond Marketing
MULTI PACKAGING SOLUTIONS: Moody's Affirms B2 Corp. Family Rating
MUSCLEPHARM CORP: ANB Bank Extends Loan Maturity to 2016
NET ELEMENT: Notes Moratorium Date Expires

NET ELEMENT: Oleg Firer Reports 3.7% Equity Stake as of Oct. 7
NEW SPRING: Case Summary & 13 Largest Unsecured Creditors
NORD RESOURCES: Receiver Wants Chapter 11 Case Dismissed
NORD RESOURCES: Section 341 Meeting Set for Dec. 3
NORD RESOURCES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

PREMIER EXHIBITIONS: Incurs $3.46 Million Net Loss in 2nd Quarter
PREMIER EXHIBITIONS: Reports $3.46M Loss for Aug. 31 Quarter
QUIKSILVER INC: Creditors Balk at Oaktree Financing Proposal
QUIKSILVER INC: Oaktree May Combine Surfwear Retailer w/ Billabong
QUIKSILVER INC: Wins Court Approval of Oaktree Bankruptcy Loan

RADIOSHACK CORP: Judge Denies Challenge of $100M IRS Claim
RELATIVITY MEDIA: Television Buyers Want to Retain CEO, Employees
REVEL AG: Says Utility Blocks Securing New Source of Heat
RG STEEL: Judge Approves Structured Settlement of Claims
ROSETTA GENOMICS: Expects to File Q2 Form 10-Q by Oct. 28

ROSETTA GENOMICS: Raises $8 Million From Private Placement
SANMINA CORP: S&P Affirms 'BB' CCR, Outlook Stable
SANUWAVE HEALTH: Kevin Richardson Reports 13.9% Stake as of Sept. 2
SOUTHCROSS ENERGY: S&P Lowers CCR to 'B-', Outlook Stable
SOUTHLAND BAKING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

TAYLOR-WHARTON INT'L: Gets Interim OK to Tap $14M DIP Financing
TECHPRECISION CORP: Chief Financial Officer Quits
TRANS-LUX CORP: Creates New "Series B Convertible Preferred Stock"
TRI STATE TRUCKING: Seeks Approval of $2-Mil. DIP Financing
VALITAS HEALTH: Moody's Cuts Corporate Family Rating to Caa3

VISANT HOLDING: S&P Puts 'B' CCR on CreditWatch Developing
WAFERGEN BIO-SYSTEMS: Amends 1,500 Class A Units Prospectus
WIRE COMPANY: Oct. 21 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
ZYNEX INC: Hires Paul Oberman Interim Chief Financial Officer
[*] Bulletproof-Vest Material Co. Fights Bid to Revive FCA Claims

[*] Higher Default Rates Expected for US Coal Sector, Fitch Says
[*] Iron Horse to Sell 1,477 Acres of Land in Bankruptcy Auction
[*] SEC Readies Clawback Rules for Punishing Bad Accounting
[*] UAW Health Care Trusts Report $20.7 Billion 2014 Shortfall
[*] Vermont AG Warns of Scam Calls Targeting Bankruptcy Filers

[*] Weitz Joins EisnerAmper's Bankruptcy & Restructuring Practice
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from October 12 to 16, 2015

                            *********

22ND CENTURY: Announces Research Collaboration with Anandia
-----------------------------------------------------------
22nd Century Group, Inc., announced it has entered into a new
cannabis research collaboration with strategic partner Anandia
Laboratories, Inc., based in Vancouver, Canada.  As a part of this
research collaboration, Anandia will develop and grow cannabis
strains that express highly desirable characteristics and will lead
to exciting commercialization opportunities.  Dr. Paul Rushton,
22nd Century's new vice president of Plant Biotechnology, will have
responsibility for this partnership with Anandia.

The Company last year announced that Botanical Genetics, LLC (a
wholly owned subsidiary of 22nd Century Group) entered into a
worldwide license agreement with Anandia that granted exclusive
rights to 22nd Century in the United States to four genes required
for cannabinoid production in the cannabis plant.  The license also
granted 22nd Century co-exclusive rights with Anandia to this
proprietary technology in all countries outside of the U.S. and
Canada.  Anandia retained exclusive rights in Canada.

The proprietary technology licensed from Anandia allows for the
development of cannabis strains that demonstrate either an increase
or decrease in the production and content of all, or certain
subsets of, cannabinoids.  The long-term goals of the Company's
research activities relating to cannabis are to develop, protect
and commercially produce unique cannabis plant varieties that
include high levels of non-THC cannabinoids, such as CBD, for the
legal medical marijuana markets, as well as virtually
cannabinoid-free cannabis for the commercial hemp industry.

Jonathan Page, Ph.D., co-founder, CEO and chief scientific officer
of Anandia - and the inventor of some of 22nd Century's powerful
transcription factor technology in the tobacco plant -- is an
internationally-recognized pioneer and leader in cannabis science
who co-led the team that first sequenced the cannabis genome and
has made fundamental discoveries about cannabinoid biosynthesis.
Applying Dr. Page's expertise and Anandia's patented technology,
the Anandia team will use modern plant breeding approaches and
genomics to create next-generation cannabis strains.

Dr. Page stated, "Anandia benefits from an excellent relationship
with 22nd Century and we are excited to be expanding our
relationship through this research collaboration aimed at creating
unique cannabis strains with highly desirable traits that can be
commercialized quickly."

Henry Sicignano, III, president and CEO of 22nd Century explained,
"In much the same way that we enjoy a monopoly on the nicotinic
biosynthetic pathway of tobacco, our license agreement and research
activities with Anandia will facilitate 22nd Century's control of
the cannabinoid biosynthetic pathway in cannabis throughout the
U.S. market."  Mr. Sicignano continued, "Though not directly
related to our main tobacco businesses, the exclusivity in, and
control of, 'next generation cannabis strains' could ultimately be
worth billions of dollars to 22nd Century."

                         About 22nd Century

Clarence, New York-based 22nd Century Group, Inc., through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, 22nd Century Ltd, is a plant
biotechnology company using technology that allows for the level
of nicotine and other nicotinic alkaloids (e.g., nornicotine,
anatabine and anabasine) in tobacco plants to be decreased or
increased through genetic engineering and plant breeding.

22nd Century reported a net loss of $15.6 million on $529,000 of
revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared to a net loss of
$26.2 million on $7.27 million of revenue during the prior year.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $23.3 million in total assets,
$6.7 million in total liabilities and $16.5 million in total
shareholders' equity.


ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES: Reports 2015 Third Quarter Results
----------------------------------------------------------
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., reported a net loss of $197 million
on $1.06 billion of net revenue for the three months ended Sept.
26, 2015, compared to net income of $17 million on $1.42 billion of
net revenue for the three months ended Sept. 27, 2014.

For the nine months ended Sept. 26, 2015, the Company reported a
net loss of $558 million on $3.03 billion of net revenue compared
to a net loss of $39 million on $4.26 billion of net revenue for
the nine months ended Sept. 27, 2014.

As of Sept. 26, 2015, the Company had $3.22 billion in total
assets, $3.56 billion in total liabilities, and a $336 million
total stockholders' deficit.

"AMD delivered double-digit percentage sequential revenue growth in
both of our segments in the third quarter," said Dr. Lisa Su, AMD
president and CEO.  "We continue to take targeted actions to
improve long-term financial performance, build great products and
simplify our business model.  The formation of a joint venture of
our back-end manufacturing assets is a significant step towards
achieving these goals and strengthening our balance sheet."

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

                        http://is.gd/mxqIZe

                    About Advanced Micro Devices

Sunnyvale, California-based Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., is a
global semiconductor company.  The Company's products include x86
microprocessors and graphics.

For the year ended Dec. 27, 2014, the Company reported a net loss
of $403 million on $5.50 billion of net revenue compared to a net
loss of $83 million on $5.29 billion of net revenue for the year
ended Dec. 28, 2013.

As of June 27, 2015, the Company had $3.4 billion in total assets,
$3.5 billion in total liabilities, and a $141 million total
stockholders' deficit.

                          *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on April 22, 2015, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services said it lowered its corporate credit rating on Sunnyvale,
Calif.-based Advanced Micro Devices Inc. to 'B-' from 'B'.  "The
downgrade reflects AMD's recently sharpened revenue declines, weak
industry conditions and intense competition from Intel in PC
markets, and the challenges it faces to grow in targeted
enterprise, embedded, and semi-custom product markets to offset PC
business declines," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst John
Moore.

As reported by the TCR on June 5, 2014, Fitch Ratings had upgraded
the long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) for AMD (NYSE: AMD) to
'B-' from 'CCC'.  The upgrade primarily reflects AMD's improved
financial flexibility from recent refinancing activity, which
extends meaningful debt maturities until 2019.

In July 2015, Moody's Investors Service lowered AMD's corporate
family rating to 'Caa1' from 'B3', and the ratings on the senior
unsecured notes to 'Caa2' from 'Caa1'.  The downgrade of the
corporate family rating to 'Caa1' reflects AMD's prospects for
ongoing operating losses over the next year and negative free cash
flow.


ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES: Signs Equity Purchase Pact with Nantong
---------------------------------------------------------------
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., on Oct. 15, 2015, entered into an
Equity Interest Purchase Agreement with Nantong Fujitsu
Microelectronics Co., Ltd., a Chinese joint stock company ("JV
Party"), under which the Company will sell to JV Party a majority
of the equity interests in AMD Technologies (China) Co. Ltd. a
wholly-foreign owned enterprise incorporated as a limited liability
company and Advanced Micro Devices Export Sdn. Bhd., a Malaysian
limited liability company and, together with the Chinese Target
Company, thereby forming two joint ventures) with JV Party in a
transaction valued at approximately $436 million.

The JV Party will acquire 85% of the equity interests in each JV
for approximately $371 million and the Company estimates it will
receive approximately $320 million cash, net of taxes and other
customary expenses.  After closing, JV Party's affiliates will own
85% of the equity interests in each JV while the Company's
subsidiaries will own the remaining 15%.  The Transaction will
result in the JVs providing assembly, testing, marking, packing and
packaging services to the Company.  The Company plans to account
for its investment in the JV under the equity method of
accounting.

The Equity Interest Purchase Agreement includes representations,
warranties and covenants, as well as covenants restricting the
Company from permitting the Target Companies to take certain
corporate actions in between signing of the Equity Purchase
Agreement and the closing of the Transaction.  The Equity Interest
Purchase Agreement contains customary indemnification obligations
of each party with respect to breaches of their respective
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements. Consummation
of the Transaction is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of
certain closing conditions, including, among other matters: (i) the
absence, subject to certain materiality standards, of breaches of
representations, warranties or covenants; (ii) receipt of certain
government approvals; and (iii) the absence of proceedings or
litigation that would restrain, enjoin or render illegal any
transactions contemplated by the Equity Interest Purchase
Agreement.

The Equity Interest Purchase Agreement may be terminated prior to
Closing: (i) by either the Company or JV Party in the event that
(A) any governmental authority issues an order or ruling
restraining, enjoining or rendering illegal any transactions
contemplated by the Equity Interest Purchase Agreement, (B) there
is a material breach of a representation, warranty or covenant such
that the conditions to Closing would not be satisfied, (C) certain
conditions have not been satisfied or waived by the 270th date from
the date of the Equity Interest Purchase Agreement (or longer time
period in certain circumstances); or (ii) by the mutual consent of
the parties.

The Equity Interest Purchase Agreement also has related agreements
including: (i) with respect to the Malaysian Target Company, a
Shareholders' Agreement, and with respect to the Chinese Target
Company, a Joint Venture Contract, governing the joint venture
relationships from and after the Closing, (ii) an IP License
Agreement, (iii) a Manufacturing Services Agreement, (iv) a
Transition Services Agreement; and (v) a Trademark License
Agreement.

A copy of the Equity Purchase Agreement is available at:

                         http://is.gd/GvBX5K

                     About Advanced Micro Devices

Sunnyvale, California-based Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., is a
global semiconductor company.  The Company's products include x86
microprocessors and graphics.

For the year ended Dec. 27, 2014, the Company reported a net loss
of $403 million on $5.50 billion of net revenue compared to a net
loss of $83 million on $5.29 billion of net revenue for the year
ended Dec. 28, 2013.

As of Sept. 26, 2015, the Company had $3.22 billion in total
assets, $3.56 billion in total liabilities and a $336 million total
stockholders' deficit.

                          *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on April 22, 2015, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services said it lowered its corporate credit rating on Sunnyvale,
Calif.-based Advanced Micro Devices Inc. to B- from B.  "The
downgrade reflects AMD's recently sharpened revenue declines, weak
industry conditions and intense competition from Intel in PC
markets, and the challenges it faces to grow in targeted
enterprise, embedded, and semi-custom product markets to offset PC
business declines," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst John
Moore.

As reported by the TCR on June 5, 2014, Fitch Ratings had upgraded
the long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) for AMD (NYSE: AMD) to
'B-' from 'CCC'.  The upgrade primarily reflects AMD's improved
financial flexibility from recent refinancing activity, which
extends meaningful debt maturities until 2019.

In July 2015, Moody's Investors Service lowered Advanced Micro
Devices, Inc's ("AMD") corporate family rating to Caa1 from B3, and
the ratings on the senior unsecured notes to Caa2 from Caa1.  
The downgrade of the corporate family rating to Caa1 reflects AMD's
prospects for ongoing operating losses over the next year and
negative free cash flow.


AFFIRMATIVE INSURANCE: Chapter 11 Filings Trigger Default
---------------------------------------------------------
Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc., et al.'s Chapter 11 filings
constitute an event of default under the following:

* $10,000,000 Second Lien Credit Agreement

Affirmative is borrower under that certain $10,000,000 Second Lien
Credit Agreement dated Sept. 30, 2013, with JCF AFFM Debt Holdings,
L.P.  Under Article VII(h) of the Credit Agreement, the Chapter 11
filings constitute an Event of Default.  Additionally, on Oct. 9,
2015, JCF sent Affirmative a Notice of Event of Default and
Acceleration, asserting that an Event of Default had occurred under
Article VII(g) and (h) of the Credit Agreement by virtue of the
Agreed Order of Rehabilitation entered on Sept. 16, 2015, against
Affirmative Insurance Company.  In the Acceleration Letter, JCF
declared all outstanding sums due under the Credit Agreement
immediately due and payable in full.  As of Sept. 30, 2015, the
principal amount due to JCF under the Credit Agreement is
approximately $15.1 million, with accrued but unpaid interest of
approximately $0.4 million.

* $30,000,000 Trust Preferred Securities Due March 15, 2035

Under the Indenture, dated Dec. 21, 2004, between Affirmative and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as trustee, the Chapter 11 filings
constitute an Event of Default pursuant to Section 5.01(e) of the
2004 Indenture, in which case the entire principal amount
outstanding and any premium and interest accrued, but unpaid, will
become immediately due and payable.  As of Sept. 30, 2015, the
principal amount due to third parties under the 2004 Indenture is
approximately $30.0 million, with accrued but unpaid interest of
approximately $4.9 million.

* $20,000,000 Floating Rate Subordinated Notes Due March 15, 2035

Under the Indenture, dated March 29, 2005, between USAgencies,
L.L.C. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee,
and that certain Supplemental Indenture, dated Sept. 30, 2013,
between Affirmative and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as trustee, the Chapter 11 filings constitute an Event of
Default pursuant to Section 5.01(e) of the USAgencies Indenture, in
which case the entire principal amount outstanding and any premium
and interest accrued, but unpaid, shall become immediately due and
payable.  As of Sept. 30, 2015, the principal amount due to third
parties under the 2004 Indenture is approximately $20.0 million,
with accrued but unpaid interest of approximately $0.3 million.

* $25,000,000 Trust Preferred Securities Due June 15, 2035

Under the Indenture, dated June 1, 2005, between Affirmative and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee, the Chapter
11 filings constitute an Event of Default pursuant to Section
5.01(e) of the 2005 Indenture, in which case the entire principal
amount outstanding and any premium and interest accrued, but
unpaid, shall become immediately due and payable.  As of Sept. 30,
2015, the principal amount due to third parties under the 2005
Indenture is approximately $25.0 million, with accrued but unpaid
interest of approximately $4.0 million.

                    About Affirmative Insurance

Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc., Affirmative Management
Services, Inc., Affirmative Services, Inc., Affirmative
Underwriting Services, Inc., Affirmative Insurance Services, Inc.,

Affirmative General Agency, Inc., Affirmative Insurance Group, Inc.
and Affirmative, L.L.C. sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Proposed Lead Case No. 15-12136) on Oct. 14, 2015.
The petition was signed by Michael J. McClure as chief executive
officer.

The Debtors have engaged McDermott Will & Emery LLP as general
bankruptcy counsel, Polsinelli PC as local Delaware counsel, Faegre
Baker Daniels LLP as special regulatory counsel, BDO USA LLP as
financial consultant and Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy as notice
and claims agent.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $25.20 million and total
debts of $91.26 million as of Aug. 31, 2015.

Founded in June 1998, Affirmative provides non-standard personal
automobile insurance policies for individual consumers in targeted
geographic markets.  NSPAI policies provide coverage to drivers who
find it difficult to obtain insurance from standard automobile
insurance companies due to their lack of prior insurance, age,
driving record, limited financial resources, or other factors.


ALEXZA PHARMACEUTICALS: Updates on ADASUVE Commercial Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------
Grupo Ferrer Internacional, SA (Ferrer) and Alexza Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., provided an update on the commercial activities related to
ADASUVE inhalation powder, pre-dispensed (Staccato loxapine) in the
European Union (EU) and Latin America. Ferrer is Alexza's
commercial partner for ADASUVE in the European Union, Latin
America, Korea, Philippines, Thailand, countries in the
Commonwealth of Independent States and the Middle East and North
Africa.

"We continue to dedicate substantial efforts toward ADASUVE's
success.  The feedback we are receiving distinguishes ADASUVE as a
highly valuable medication, one that provides superior treatment to
patients and a better tool to physicians.  ADASUVE is changing the
paradigm of current treatment.  This paradigm change requires time
and substantial, sustained efforts to achieve significant business.
We are determined to bring ADASUVE to the patients that could
benefit from it," said Antoni Villaro, chief operating officer of
Ferrer.  "As part of our global partnership, we have recently
provided financing to Alexza through a short-term loan as the
Company goes through strategic evaluation of its business.  We
remain strong, long-term supporters of Alexza and of ADASUVE."

"Ferrer is leading the way in penetrating the target markets in its
territory and bringing ADASUVE to fill the unmet need for patients
and their families.  We remain confident in ADASUVE's long-term
commercial prospects," said Thomas B. King, president and CEO of
Alexza Pharmaceuticals.  "We are aware there are considerable
challenges in launching a hospital product, especially one as
unique and novel as ADASUVE.  We continue to be impressed with the
hard work and progress Ferrer is making on the commercial front, as
well as on the clinical development and regulatory fronts.  This
work is focused on evaluating markets and real-world use of the
product, with the goals of implementing appropriate changes and
potential label expansions that would allow product availability in
expanded markets."

Since the last reported European and Latin America update in
September 2014, Ferrer has made the following progress:

   * ADASUVE is now available in 283 hospital settings in the EU,
     compared to approximately 160 hospitals one year ago, an
     increase of 77%.

   * ADASUVE has experienced continued sustained growth in product
     sales.  Unit sales during the first half of 2015 were more
     than 6 times the number of ADASUVE units sold in the first
     half of 2014.

   * Alexza and Ferrer continue to receive strong and consistent
     feedback from healthcare professionals across all countries
     in Europe.  Countries with routine use of ADASUVE include
     Germany, Romania, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark and Spain.
     The rest of the EU countries, where ADASUVE is commercially
     available, are in the process of listing the product in the
     hospital formularies, and gaining initial trial and use with
     patients in hospitals in these countries.

   * ADASUVE is commercially available in 15 countries in Europe
     and three countries in Latin America, compared to a total of
     eight countries a year ago.  During the next six months,
     Ferrer expects to launch ADASUVE in additional European
     countries including the United Kingdom, Italy, Netherlands
     and Bulgaria.  ADASUVE registration activities are ongoing
     for Brazil, Mexico and Turkey.

   * Ferrer recently met with the EU regulatory authorities to   
     explore the potential modification of the ADASUVE label in
     Europe to allow the use of the product in the outpatient
     setting.

   * In the past year, there have been five publications in peer-
     reviewed journals addressing both clinical experience with
     ADASUVE and the pharmacoeconomics of using ADASUVE,
     highlighting the costs and burden of established habits of
     dealing with agitated patients.  In addition, 20 reports
     covering clinical experiences with ADASUVE have been
     presented at different congresses (International, European
     and regional within Europe).  Reported clinical experience
     with ADASUVE continue to demonstrate the positive outcomes in

     terms of safety and efficacy, as well as the convenience of
     ADASUVE administration for both patients and health care
     professionals.

   * During the second and third quarters of 2015, Alexza and
     Ferrer successfully conducted three GMP inspections of the
     Alexza manufacturing facility that provides ADASUVE for
     countries within the Ferrer Territory, including inspections
     by EMA (EU), ANVISA (Brazil) and TITCK (Turkey).  These
     inspections are part of the ongoing regulatory review
     processes for ADASUVE.

                           About Alexza
  
Mountain View, California-based Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc., was
incorporated in the state of Delaware on Dec. 19, 2000, as FaxMed,
Inc.  In June 2001, the Company changed its name to Alexza
Corporation and in December 2001 became Alexza Molecular Delivery
Corporation.  In July 2005, the Company changed its name to Alexza
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

The Company is a pharmaceutical development company focused on the
research, development, and commercialization of novel proprietary
products for the acute treatment of central nervous system
conditions.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $32.6 million in total assets,
$96.5 million in total liabilities, and a stockholders' deficit of
$63.9 million.

Alexza Pharmaceuticals reported a net loss of $36.7 million in 2014
compared to a net loss of $39.6 million in 2013.

Ernst & Young LLP, in Redwood City, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


ALROSE ALLEGRIA: Creditors Have Until Dec. 29 to File Claims
------------------------------------------------------------
A federal judge approved the deadline proposed by Alrose Allegria
LLC for filing pre-bankruptcy claims.

The order, issued by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane, gives
creditors holding claims that arose on or before the company's
bankruptcy filing, until Dec. 29, 2015, to file proofs of their
claims.

This deadline is called a "bar date" because it means that
creditors who come forward after that date may be "barred" from
ever filing a claim against the company.   

                      About Alrose Allegria

Alrose Allegria LLC sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 15-11760) in Manhattan on July 2, 2015, estimating $10
million to $50 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
debt.  Allen Rosenberg, managing member of Alrose Allegria and
president of the Alrose Group, signed the bankruptcy petition.  The
Debtor tapped Richard J. Bernard, Esq., at Foley & Lardner LLP, in
New York, as counsel.

According to the docket, the Debtor's Chapter 11 plan and
disclosure statement are due Oct. 30, 2015.  The initial case
conference was set for Aug. 3, 2015.  

In July 2011, another unit of the Alrose Group, Alrose King David
LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Case No. 11-75361) in Brooklyn.  Alrose King David LLC was a
special entity established by the Alrose Group to own the 143-room,
beachfront hotel property called the Allegria Hotel & Spa in Long
Beach, Long Island.  Alrose King David won approval of its
reorganization plan in March 2012.


AMBROSE CONSTRUCTION: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Ambrose Construction and Roustabout Service, LLC
        PO Box 189
        301 E. Highway 33, Suite A-3
        Perkins, OK 74059

Case No.: 15-13956

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 15, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Oklahoma (Oklahoma City)

Judge: Hon. Janice D. Loyd

Debtor's Counsel: Jeffrey E. Tate, Esq.
                  CHRISTENSEN LAW GROUP, P.L.L.C.
                  3401 N.W. 63rd Street, Suite 600
                  Oklahoma City, OK 73116
                  Tel: 405-232-2020
                  Fax: 405-236-1012
                  Email: jeffrey@christensenlawgroup.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Stephen Ambrose, manager.

A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/okwb15-13956.pdf


AMERICAN APPAREL: Describes Survival Plan to Bankruptcy Judge
-------------------------------------------------------------
Katy Stech, writing for Dow Jones' Daily Bankruptcy Review,
reported that American Apparel Inc.'s bankruptcy lawyers laid out
the clothing manufacturer and retail chain's survival plan, which
would give it access to $10 million in cash while company officials
fix inventory problems at its 230 stores.

According to the report, under a plan outline filed on Oct. 15, the
Los Angeles-based company will leave bankruptcy with a $30 million
loan and a far-smaller debt load, and under the ownership of some
of its current investors.  The fresh financial start will give
company leaders the chance to deal with stale inventory that
clogged its stores, put more seasonal items on the shelves and
focus on top-selling items, the report related.

                    About American Apparel

American Apparel, Inc., American Apparel (USA), LLC,  American
Apparel Retail, Inc., American Apparel Dyeing & Finishing, Inc.,
KCL Knitting, LLC and Fresh Air Freight, Inc. sought Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Proposed Lead Case No.
15-12055) on Oct. 5, 2015.  The petition was signed by Hassan
Natha as chief financial officer.

The Debtors reported total assets of $199,360,934 and total
liabilities of $397,576,744.

The Debtors and their non-Debtor affiliates operate a vertically
integrated manufacturing, distribution, and retail business
focused
on branded fashion-basic apparel, employing approximately 8,500
employees across six manufacturing facilities and approximately
230
retail stores in the United States and 17 other countries
worldwide.

The Debtors have engaged Jones Day as restructuring counsel,
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as local counsel, Moelis &
Company as investment banker, FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial
advisor, DJM Real Estate as real estate consultant and Garden City
Group, LLC as claims and noticing agent.


AMERICAN COMMERCE: Incurs $55,000 Net Loss in Second Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
American Commerce Solutions, Inc., filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $55,310 on $543,051 of net sales for the three months
ended Aug. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $98,468 on $474,336
of net sales for the same period in 2014.

For the six months ended Aug. 31, 2015, the Company reported a net
loss of $106,635 on $1.05 million of net sales compared to a net
loss of $38,511 on $1.08 million of net sales for the same period
during the prior year.

As of Aug. 31, 2015, the Company had $4.80 million in total assets,
$3.19 million in total liabilities and $1.61 million in total
stockholders' equity.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                       http://is.gd/YPWjqA

                      About American Commerce

American Commerce Solutions, Inc., headquartered in Bartow,
Florida, is primarily a holding company with one wholly owned
subsidiary; International Machine and Welding, Inc., is engaged in
the machining and fabrication of parts used in heavy industry, and
parts sales and service for heavy construction equipment.

American Commerce reported a net loss of $130,000 for the year
ended Feb. 28, 2015, compared to a net loss of $169,000 for the
year ended Feb. 28, 2014.

Messineo & Co., CPAs LLC, in Clearwater, Florida, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Feb. 28, 2015, citing that the Company has recurring
losses resulting in an accumulated deficit and is in default of
several notes payable.  These conditions raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.


AMERICAN LIBERTY: Seeks Lender Entity Substitution With Veranda
---------------------------------------------------------------
American Liberty Oil Company, LP, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, to substitute
Veranda Operating Company, LLC, as the name of the lender entity in
place of Climbing Tree Holdings LLC.

The Debtor relates that the Court's Final DIP Order authorized the
Debtor to borrow up to $100,000 from Climbing Tree.  The Debtor
notes that Climbing Tree was to be a new entity established by Erin
Wynne and Wreno S. Wynne, Jr., who manage the Debtor for the
purpose of providing the financing authorized by the Final DIP
Order.  The Debtor further relates that after the Court's entry of
the Final DIP Order, Erin and Wes' application before the Texas
Secretary of State to name their new entity Climbing Tree was
denied for being too similar to an existing entity.  The Debtor
contends that in light of this inability to establish the Climbing
Tree entity, Wes and Erin will provide the financing approved by
the Court's Final Order through an already established and approved
entity, Vandera Operating Company, LLC.

The Debtor tells the Court that because the Court's Final Order
specifically identifies Climbing Tree as the Debtor's DIP lender,
the Debtor files its Motion out of an abundance of caution to
correct the mistake in the Final Order resulting from the rejection
of the Climbing Tree name to the entity chosen as the Debtor's
lender.

American Liberty Oil Company, LP is represented by:

          Hudson M. Jobe, Esq.
          Timothy A. York, Esq.
          QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, WINSLETT
          & MOSER, P.C.
          2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800
          Dallas, TX 75201
          Telephone: (214)871-2100
          Facsimile: (214)871-2111
        
                About American Liberty Oil

American Liberty Oil Company, LP filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 15-32019) on May 6, 2015.  The
petition was signed by Wreno S. Wynne, Jr., as managing partner of
ALOC LLC.  The Debtor estimated assets of $10 million to $50
million and debts of $1 million to $10 million in its petition.
Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C., serves as the
Debtor's counsel.  The case is assigned to Hon. Stacey G. Jernigan.


ANNA'S LINENS: Court Approves Sale of Store Leases
--------------------------------------------------
Judge Theodor C. Albert of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California approved the sale of Anna's Linens,
Inc.'s store leases, free and clear of interests.

The Debtor's sale of its unexpired store real property leases was
made at an auction held on August 27, 2015.

Decron Properties Corp., as agent for the landlord NF Plant
Enterprises, was deemed the successful bidder for the Store Lease
for Store No. 97, which is located at 7888-2 Van Nuys Boulevard, in
Van Nuys, California.  FP Stores, Inc., was deemed the successful
bidder for the remaining 41 Store Leases.

The Court authorized the Debtor to assume the FP Store Leases and
to assign the FP Store Leases to FP.

Judge Albert scheduled a hearing on October 28, 2015, at 10:00
a.m., for the Court to consider any requests by landlords under the
FP Store Leases for the payment of additional cure amounts related
solely to attorneys' fees asserted by landlords to be due and
payable under their respective leases which have not been resolved
by mutual agreeement of the Debtor and the applicable landlords.

Anna's Linens, Inc., is represented by:

          David B. Golubchik, Esq.
          Eve H. Karasik, Esq.
          Juliet Y. Oh, Esq.
          Lindsey L. Smith, Esq.
          LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER,
          YOO & BRILL L.L.P.
          10250 Constellation Boulevard, Suite 1700
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310)229-1234
          Facsimile: (310)229-1244
          Email: DBG@LNBYB.COM
                 EHK@LNBYB.COM
                 JYO@LNBYB.COM
                 LLS@LNBYB.COM

                     About Anna's Linens

Anna's Linens is a specialty retailer offering home textiles,
furnishings and decor at attractive prices.  Headquartered in
Costa Mesa, California, operates a chain of 268 company owned
retail stores throughout 19 states in the United States (including
Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C.) generates over $300 million in
annual revenue and employs a workforce of over 2,500 associates.

Anna's Linens sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 15-13008) in Santa Ana, California, on June 14,
2015.

The case is assigned to Judge Theodor Albert.  The Debtor tapped
Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP as counsel.  The Debtor
estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and debt of $100
million to $500 million.

The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of Anna's Linens
Inc. appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors.


ANTHONY LAWRENCE: Case Summary & 13 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Anthony Lawrence of New York, Inc.
        32-33 47th Avenue  
        Long Island City, NY 11101-2426

Case No.: 15-44702

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 15, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)

Judge: Hon. Elizabeth S. Stong

Debtor's Counsel: James P Pagano, Esq.
                  277 Broadway, Suite 801
                  New York, NY 10007-2042
                  Tel: (212) 732-4740
                  Fax: (212) 385-2545
                  Email: jpaganoesq@aol.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Joseph J. Calagna, president.

A list of the Debtor's 13 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb15-44702.pdf


APOLLO MEDICAL: Board Amends Bylaws
-----------------------------------
The Board of Directors of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. amended
Section 3.1 of the Company's Restated Bylaws to provide that the
authorized number of directors shall be fixed from time to time by
the board of directors, provided that the authorized number of
directors shall not be less than one.

                        About Apollo Medical

Glendale, Calif.-based Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc., provides
hospitalist services in the Greater Los Angeles, California area.
Hospitalist medicine is organized around the admission and care of
patients in an inpatient facility such as a hospital or skilled
nursing facility and is focused on providing, managing and
coordinating the care of hospitalized patients.

Apollo Medical reported a net loss attributable to the Company of
$1.8 million on $32.9 million of net revenues for the year ended
March 31, 2015, compared to a net loss attributable to the Company
of $5 million on $10.5 million of net revenues for the year ended
Jan. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $13.26 million in total
assets, $16.99 million in total liabilities and total
stockholders' deficit of $3.73 million.


APOLLO MEDICAL: Names Warren Hosseinion as Secretary
----------------------------------------------------
Warren Hosseinion, M.D., was appointed by the Board of Directors to
serve as the secretary of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc., effective
Oct. 12, 2015, to fill the vacancy created by the previous
resignation of Mitchell Creem from all positions he held with the
Company.

                       About Apollo Medical

Glendale, Calif.-based Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc., provides
hospitalist services in the Greater Los Angeles, California area.
Hospitalist medicine is organized around the admission and care of
patients in an inpatient facility such as a hospital or skilled
nursing facility and is focused on providing, managing and
coordinating the care of hospitalized patients.

Apollo Medical reported a net loss attributable to the Company of
$1.8 million on $32.9 million of net revenues for the year ended
March 31, 2015, compared to a net loss attributable to the Company
of $5 million on $10.5 million of net revenues for the year ended
Jan. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $13.26 million in total
assets, $16.99 million in total liabilities and total
stockholders' deficit of $3.73 million.


ASBH INC: Moody's Assigns '(P)Ba1' Corporate Family Rating
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned a provisional (P)Ba1
corporate family rating to ASBH, Inc. with a stable outlook. A
provisional (P)Ba1/stable outlook rating is also assigned to its
expected $1.35 billion Term Loan and $150 million Revolving Credit
Facility. ASBH Inc. is the parent company of First Eagle Investment
Management, LLC, an asset manager specializing in equity mutual
funds. The final rating assignment will occur at the close of the
transaction.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's stated that ASBH Inc.'s rating reflects the company's
relatively modest industry position among its rated asset managers,
with $90 billion of assets under management (AUM), but gives
particular consideration to its strong pedigree, long-term track
record and experienced management team. In contrast to other active
equity managers, the firm's marketing and sales teams have been
very successful in transforming investment outperformance into
organic growth in AUM. Notably, the firm's positive net flows and
strong investment performance being produced by a modest staff of
188 employees has led to high margins and a very flexible cost
structure.

The provisional Ba1 rating also reflects several credit concerns:
1) ASBH Inc. is undergoing a leveraged buy-out resulting in
substantial leverage at approximately 3.2 times annual EBITDA
(Moody's calculation). The firm will be primarily owned by
Blackstone and Corsair whose management incentives may not reflect
the conservatism shown historically during majority ownership by
the Arnhold and Kellen families; 2) Although investment results
have been historically strong, assets are highly concentrated in
the hands of one portfolio management team resulting in a lack of
business and product diversification; and 3) Risk that the
relatively new portfolio management team fails to perform up to the
levels which the brand is known for.

The rating agency added that the company's issuer rating would see
upward pressure if the company achieves: (1) rapid deleveraging,
with debt to EBITDA sustained below 2.0 times, and (2) strong
absolute investment performance combined with organic AUM growth.
However, Moody's said that ASBH Inc.'s issuer rating could be
downgraded if the following occurs: (1) deviation of the company's
management and culture away from its historical conservatism, (2)
leverage increases above 4.0x debt to EBITDA, (3) the firm
continues to experience net outflows, and 4) significant
underperformance of the firm's two flagship funds relative to their
benchmarks.

The following ratings have been assigned to ASBH, Inc:

  Corporate Family Rating -- (P)Ba1/stable

  $1.35 billion Term Loan -- (P)Ba1/stable

  $150 million Revolving Credit Facility -- (P)Ba1/stable



AXION INTERNATIONAL: GBQ Partners Replaces BDO as Accountants
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of Axion International Holdings, Inc.,
replaced BDO USA, LLP as the Company's independent registered
public accounting firm, and appointed GBQ Partners LLC as the
Company's new independent registered public accounting firm.

BDO's reports on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the fiscal years ended Dec. 31, 2014, and 2013 did not contain
an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting
principle.

The reports of BDO on the Company's financial statements for each
of the fiscal years ended Dec. 31, 2014, and 2013 contained an
explanatory paragraph, which noted that there was substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

During the fiscal years ended Dec. 31, 2014, and 2013 and through
the Dismissal Date, there were no disagreements between the Company
and BDO on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures.

During the two most recent fiscal years and through the current
date, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted with
GBQ.

                     About Axion International

New Providence, N.J.-based Axion International Holdings, Inc. (OTC
BB: AXIH) - http://www.axionintl.com/-- is the exclusive licensee
of patented and patent-pending technologies developed for the
production of structural plastic products such as railroad
crossties, pilings, I-beams, T-Beams, and various size boards
including a tongue and groove design that are utilized in multiple
engineered design solutions such as rail track, rail and tank
bridges (heavy load), pedestrian/park and recreation bridges,
marinas, boardwalks and bulk heading to name a few.

Axion International reported a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $17.2 million on $14.4 million of revenue for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared with a net loss attributable to
common shareholders of $25.8 million on $6.62 million of revenue
for the same period in 2013.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $19.3 million in total
assets, $40.1 million in total liabilities, $6.82 million in 10%
convertible convertible preferred stock, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $27.6 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in New York, New York, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014, noting that Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has working capital and net capital
deficiencies that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


BERNARD L. MADOFF: Jury Told E&Y's Negligence Led to $128M Loss
---------------------------------------------------------------
Brandon Lowrey at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that Ernst & Young
LLP's failure to perform basic fact checks in its auditing of a
feeder fund for Bernie Madoff's bogus securities firm partially
caused FutureSelect Portfolio Management Inc. to lose $128 million
in the infamous Ponzi scheme, the investor's attorney told jurors
on Oct. 14, 2015, during opening arguments in Seattle.

According to the Associated Press' report, Ernst & Young is accused
of certifying $4.2 billion in fake assets that Ponzi schemer Bernie
Madoff claimed to have.  The major audit firm fell down on the job
and certified $4.2 billion in fake assets.

                    About Bernard L. Madoff

Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and Bernard L. Madoff
orchestrated the largest Ponzi scheme in history, with losses
topping US$50 billion.  On Dec. 15, 2008, the Honorable Louis A.
Stanton of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
New
York granted the application of the Securities Investor Protection
Corporation for a decree adjudicating that the customers of BLMIS
are in need of the protection afforded by the Securities Investor
Protection Act of 1970.  The District Court's Protective Order (i)
appointed Irving H. Picard, Esq., as trustee for the liquidation
of
BLMIS, (ii) appointed Baker & Hostetler LLP as his counsel, and
(iii) removed the SIPA Liquidation proceeding to the Bankruptcy
Court (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789) (Lifland, J.).  Mr.
Picard has retained AlixPartners LLP as claims agent.

On April 13, 2009, former BLMIS clients filed an involuntary
Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition against Bernard Madoff (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. 09-11893).  The petitioning creditors -- Blumenthal &
Associates Florida General Partnership, Martin Rappaport
Charitable Remainder Unitrust, Martin Rappaport, Marc Cherno, and
Steven Morganstern -- assert US$64 million in claims against  Mr.
Madoff based on the balances contained in the last statements they
got from BLMIS.

On April 14, 2009, Grant Thornton UK LLP as receiver placed Madoff
Securities International Limited in London under bankruptcy
protection pursuant to Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. 09-16751).  The Chapter 15 case was later
transferred to Manhattan.  In June 2009, Judge Lifland approved
the consolidation of the Madoff SIPA proceedings and the
bankruptcy
case.

Judge Denny Chin of the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York on June 29, 2009, sentenced Mr. Madoff to 150
years of life imprisonment for defrauding investors in United
States v. Madoff, No. 09-CR-213 (S.D.N.Y.).

From recoveries in lawsuits coupled with money advanced by SIPC,
Mr. Picard has commenced  distributions to victims.  As of the end
of May 2015, the SIPA Trustee has recovered more than $10.699
billion and has distributed approximately $7.576 billion.  When
additional settlements awaiting distribution are taken into
account, the recovery in the Madoff liquidation proceeding totals
$10.734 billion.


BLACK ELK: Gets Approval to Use Cash Collateral Until Oct. 28
-------------------------------------------------------------
Black Elk Energy Offshore Operations LLC won court approval to use
cash collateral until Oct. 28.

The order, issued on Oct. 14 by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Marvin Isgur,
required Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. to release $228,000 from its
collateral.

The bankruptcy judge also authorized the insurance company to use
its presently held cash collateral (in excess of the released
$228,000) to pay the bond premium to itself.  

Meanwhile, Black Elk was ordered to pay Island Operating Co. for
work to be performed during the week of October 26, according to
the court filing.

A copy of the court order and the budget is available without
charge at http://is.gd/acPCii

Judge Isgur earlier issued two separate orders that extended the
company's use of cash collateral.  

The first order signed on September 29 allowed Black Elk to use the
collateral until October 6.  It contained a language, proposed by
the U.S. Department of the Interior, clarifying that the rights of
the agency with respect to the company's decommissioning
obligations wouldn't be affected by the court order.

The second order issued on October 6 extended the company's use of
cash collateral to October 13, and authorized the company to spend
$117,988, plus $25,000 to pay the fees of independent directors.
    
Black Elk previously received objections from Maritech Resources
LLC and Black Elk Management LLC.  Both complained that the company
did not provide sufficient information, leaving creditors clueless
whether allowing the company to use cash collateral is warranted.

                          About Black Elk

Black Elk Energy Offshore Operations, LLC, is a Houston, Texas
based privately held limited liability company engaged in the
acquisition, exploitation, development and production of oil and
natural gas properties primarily in the shallow waters of the Gulf
of Mexico near the coast of Louisiana and Texas.

Black Elk had total assets of $340 million and total debt of $432
million as of Sept. 30, 2014.

Judge Letitia Z. Paul of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern
District of Texas placed Black Elk under Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection on Sept. 1, 2015, converting an involuntary Chapter 7
bankruptcy petition by its creditors.  Thereafter, the Company
filed with the Court a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Case No. 15-34287) on Sept. 10, 2015.  

Judge Paul later recused herself from the case and the matter was
given to Judge Marvin Isgur, according to information posted on the
case docket on Sept. 14.

The Debtor is represented by Elizabeth E. Green of Baker &
Hostetler.  Blackhill Partners' Jeff Jones is the Debtor's Chief
Restructuring Officer.


BLUE EAGLE: S&P Assigns 'B' CCR & Rates $540MM 1st Lien Loan 'B+'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said it assigned its 'B'
corporate credit rating to King of Prussia, Pa.-based Blue Eagle
Holdings III LP.  The outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P assigned its 'B+' issue-level rating and '2'
recovery rating to the company's $540 million first-lien term loan
due 2022 and $60 million revolving facility expiring in 2020.  The
'2' recovery rating indicates S&P's expectation for substantial
(70%-90%; lower half of the range) recovery in the event of payment
default.

S&P also assigned its 'CCC+' issue-level rating and '6' recovery
rating to the company's $100 million second-lien term loan due
2023.  The '6' recovery rating indicates S&P's expectation for
negligible (0%-10%) recovery in the event of payment default.

"The rating reflects our view of Blue Eagle's narrow retail
vertical focus, exposure to industry cyclicality, and short track
record as a stand-alone entity," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst Tuan Duong.

Partly offsetting those factors are the company's participation in
a growing e-commerce market, long-term relationships with large
retail customers, and large scale compared to its primary
competitors.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Blue Eagle will
successfully transition to a stand-alone company, maintain its
market position, and achieve consistent revenue growth and
profitability.

S&P could lower the rating if the company's operating performance
were to deteriorate due to competitive or execution factors or if
it pursues debt-financed acquisitions or shareholder returns such
that FOCF to debt declines and stays below 5%.

An upgrade is unlikely over the next 12 months given the company's
limited operating track record as a stand-alone company and the
fact that its ownership structure is likely to preclude sustained
deleveraging.



CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Creditor Group Calls Plan Flawed
-------------------------------------------------------
Michael Bathon, writing for Bloomberg News, reported that Caesars
Entertainment Operating Co.'s plan to exit bankruptcy is flawed and
can't be approved, a committee of junior noteholders said in a
court filing on Oct. 14.

According to the report, the creditor group urged a judge to deny
the Caesars unit's request to extend its exclusive control over the
reorganization and let noteholders file a competing proposal.  The
bankruptcy plan, as currently proposed, is "doomed" because it
tries to preclude the creditors from seeking guarantee claims
against Caesars' parent, the report related.

Under the current deal, backed by about 80 percent of bank lenders
and senior noteholders, parent Caesars Entertainment Corp. would
keep control of the operating unit by contributing $1.5 billion in
cash, equity and new debt to creditors, the report related.  The
noteholders claim a purported market test, to ensure the $1.5
billion offer provides adequate value, is flawed because potential
buyers won’t be able to bid on the same assets as Caesars
Entertainment Operating Co.'s parent, the report further related.

                  About Caesars Entertainment

Caesars Entertainment Corp., formerly Harrah's Entertainment Inc.,
is one of the world's largest casino companies.  Caesars casino
resorts operate under the Caesars, Bally's, Flamingo, Grand
Casinos, Hilton and Paris brand names.  The Company has its
corporate headquarters in Las Vegas.  Harrah's announced its
re-branding to Caesar's in mid-November 2010.

In January 2015, Caesars Entertainment and subsidiary Caesars
Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., announced that holders of
more than 60% of claims in respect of CEOC's 11.25% senior secured
notes due 2017, CEOC's 8.5% senior secured notes due 2020 and
CEOC's 9% senior secured notes due 2020 have signed the Amended
and Restated Restructuring Support and Forbearance Agreement,
dated as of Dec. 31, 2014, among Caesars Entertainment, CEOC and
the Consenting Creditors.  As a result, The RSA became effective
pursuant to its terms as of Jan. 9, 2015.

Appaloosa Investment Limited, et al., owed $41 million on account
of 10% second lien notes in the company, filed an involuntary
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition against CEOC (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 15-10047) on Jan. 12, 2015.  The bondholders are represented
by Robert S. Brady, Esq., at Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor
LLP.

CEOC and 172 other affiliates -- operators of 38 gaming and resort
properties in 14 U.S. states and 5 countries -- filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bank. N.D. Ill.  Lead Case No. 15-01145) on
Jan. 15, 2015.  CEOC disclosed total assets of $12.3 billion and
total debt of $19.8 billion as of Sept. 30, 2014.

Delaware Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross entered a ruling that the
bankruptcy proceedings will proceed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois.

Kirkland & Ellis serves as the Debtors' counsel.  AlixPartners is
the Debtors' restructuring advisors.  Prime Clerk LLC acts as the
Debtors' notice and claims agent.  Judge Benjamin Goldgar presides
over the cases.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed seven noteholders to serve in the
Official Committee of Second Priority Noteholders and nine members
to serve in the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee.

The U.S. Trustee appointed Richard S. Davis as Chapter 11
examiner.

                         *     *     *

The Troubled Company Reporter, on April 27, 2015, reported that
Fitch Ratings has affirmed and withdrawn the Issuer Default
Ratings (IDR) and issue ratings of Caesars Entertainment Operating
Company (CEOC).  These actions follow CEOC's Chapter 11 filing on
Jan. 15, 2015.  Accordingly, Fitch will no longer provide ratings
or analytical coverage for CEOC.

In addition, Fitch has affirmed the IDR and issue rating of
Chester Downs and Marina LLC (Chester Downs) and the ratings have
been simultaneously withdrawn for business reason. 


CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Gibbons to Testify on $18M Showboat Deal
---------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Bricketto at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that representatives
for Gibbons PC and Stockton University will be called to testify at
a New Jersey legislative hearing on the university's $18 million
purchase of the former Showboat Casino in Atlantic City, with
lawmakers poised to examine the law firm's highly critical autopsy
of the ill-fated deal.

Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee Chair Paul Sarlo,
D-Bergen, on Oct. 14, 2015, announced his plans for a new hearing
on the troubled purchase of the property from Caesars Entertainment
Operating Co. that was supposed to enable a satellite campus.

                  About Caesars Entertainment

Caesars Entertainment Corp., formerly Harrah's Entertainment Inc.,
is one of the world's largest casino companies.  Caesars casino
resorts operate under the Caesars, Bally's, Flamingo, Grand
Casinos, Hilton and Paris brand names.  The Company has its
corporate headquarters in Las Vegas.  Harrah's announced its
re-branding to Caesar's in mid-November 2010.

In January 2015, Caesars Entertainment and subsidiary Caesars
Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., announced that holders of
more than 60% of claims in respect of CEOC's 11.25% senior secured
notes due 2017, CEOC's 8.5% senior secured notes due 2020 and
CEOC's 9% senior secured notes due 2020 have signed the Amended
and Restated Restructuring Support and Forbearance Agreement,
dated as of Dec. 31, 2014, among Caesars Entertainment, CEOC and
the Consenting Creditors.  As a result, The RSA became effective
pursuant to its terms as of Jan. 9, 2015.

Appaloosa Investment Limited, et al., owed $41 million on account
of 10% second lien notes in the company, filed an involuntary
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition against CEOC (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 15-10047) on Jan. 12, 2015.  The bondholders are represented
by Robert S. Brady, Esq., at Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor
LLP.

CEOC and 172 other affiliates -- operators of 38 gaming and resort
properties in 14 U.S. states and 5 countries -- filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bank. N.D. Ill.  Lead Case No. 15-01145) on
Jan. 15, 2015.  CEOC disclosed total assets of $12.3 billion and
total debt of $19.8 billion as of Sept. 30, 2014.

Delaware Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross entered a ruling that the
bankruptcy proceedings will proceed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois.

Kirkland & Ellis serves as the Debtors' counsel.  AlixPartners is
the Debtors' restructuring advisors.  Prime Clerk LLC acts as the
Debtors' notice and claims agent.  Judge Benjamin Goldgar presides
over the cases.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed seven noteholders to serve in the
Official Committee of Second Priority Noteholders and nine members
to serve in the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee.

The U.S. Trustee appointed Richard S. Davis as Chapter 11
examiner.

                         *     *     *

The Troubled Company Reporter, on April 27, 2015, reported that
Fitch Ratings has affirmed and withdrawn the Issuer Default
Ratings (IDR) and issue ratings of Caesars Entertainment Operating
Company (CEOC).  These actions follow CEOC's Chapter 11 filing on
Jan. 15, 2015.  Accordingly, Fitch will no longer provide ratings
or analytical coverage for CEOC.

In addition, Fitch has affirmed the IDR and issue rating of
Chester Downs and Marina LLC (Chester Downs) and the ratings have
been simultaneously withdrawn for business reason.


CALMARE THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $1-Mil. Net Loss in First Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Calmare Therapeutics Incorporated filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $1 million on $7,950 of product sales for the three
months ended March 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $726,000 on
$221,000 of product sales for the same period in 2014.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $4.34 million in total
assets, $12.8 million in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficit of $8.40 million.

At March 31, 2015, cash was $500, as compared with $6,000 at Dec.
31, 2014.  Net cash used in operating activities was $(295,000) for
the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to $(212,000)
for the three months ended March 31, 2014, primarily reflecting an
increase in net loss partially offset by an increase in accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities and non-cash equity
expenses.  There was minimal investing activity year to date in
both 2015 and 2014.  Net cash provided by financing activities was
$290,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2015, as compared to $502,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2014, primarily as a result of the Company's debt and
equity financing activities in both periods.

"We currently have the benefit of using a portion of our
accumulated net operating losses to eliminate any future regular
federal and state income tax liabilities.  We will continue to
receive this benefit until we have utilized all of our NOLs,
federal and state.  However, we cannot determine when and if we
will be profitable enough to utilize the benefit of the remaining
NOLs before they expire," the Company states in the report.

                            Going Concern

The Company has incurred operating losses since fiscal 2006 and has
a working capital and shareholders' deficiency at March 31, 2015.
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, and 2014, the Company
had a significant concentration of revenues from our Calmare Device
technology.  

"We continue to seek revenue from new and existing technologies or
products to mitigate the concentration of revenues, and replace
revenues from expiring licenses on other technologies.

Although we have taken steps to significantly reduce operating
expenses going forward, even at these reduced spending levels,
should the anticipated increase in revenue from sales of Calmare
medical devices and other technologies not occur, the Company may
not have sufficient cash flow to fund operations through 2015 and
into 2016.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        http://is.gd/bF0pZW

                     About Calmare Therapeutics

Calmare Therapeutics Incorporated, formerly known as Competitive
Technologies, Inc., provides distribution, patent and technology
transfer, sales and licensing services focused on the needs of its
customers and matching those requirements with commercially viable
product or technology solutions.  Sales of the Company's
Calmare(R) pain therapy medical device continue to be the major
source of revenue for the Company.

Calmare reported a net loss of $3.4 million on $1 million of
product sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared to a net
loss of $2.6 million on $653,000 of product sales for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2013.

Mayer Hoffman McCann CPAs, in New York, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has incurred operating
losses since fiscal year 2006 and has a working capital and
shareholders' deficiency at Dec. 31, 2014.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


CANCER GENETICS: Closes Acquisition of Response Genetics
--------------------------------------------------------
Cancer Genetics, Inc., completed on Oct. 9, 2015, its acquisition
of substantially all the assets and the assumption of certain
liabilities of Response Genetics, Inc. pursuant to the terms of the
Acquisition Agreement.

On Aug. 10, 2015, Cancer Genetics filed a quarterly report on Form
10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission announcing, among
other things, that Cancer Genetics agreed, in principle, to act as
the "stalking horse bidder" in connection with the sale of
substantially all the assets and assumption of certain liabilities
of Response Genetics in connection with Response Genetics' filing
of a Chapter 11 petition for bankruptcy in the Delaware Bankruptcy
Court.  On Aug. 21, 2015, the Company filed a Current Report on
Form 8-K with the SEC announcing, among other things, the
definitive Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement.  

On Oct. 9, 2015, Cancer Genetics acquired substantially all the
assets and assumed certain liabilities of Response Genetics for
approximately $13,400,000, comprised of $7,000,000, in cash, and
788,584 shares of the Company's common stock, with the common stock
being valued at $6,400,000.

As of Sept. 30, 2015, Response Genetics had 90 employees,
comprising 87 full-time and 3 part-time employees.

                       About Cancer Genetics

Rutherford, N.J.-based Cancer Genetics, Inc., is an early-stage
diagnostics company focused on developing and commercializing
proprietary genomic tests and services to improve and personalize
the diagnosis, prognosis and response to treatment (theranosis) of
cancer.

Cancer Genetics reported a net loss of $16.6 million in 2014, a net
loss of $12.4 million in 2013 and a net loss of $6.66 million in
2012.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $39.8 million in total assets,
$13 million in total liabilities and $26.7 million in total
stockholders' equity


CAPITAL INVESTMENTS: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Capital Investments, LLC
        10195 Main St., Suite M
        Fairfax, VA 22031

Case No.: 15-13600

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 15, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria)

Judge: Hon. Robert G. Mayer

Debtor's Counsel: John P. Forest, II, Esq.
                  STAHLZELLOE, P.C.
                  11350 Random Hill Rd., Suite 700
                  Fairfax, VA 22030
                  Tel: (703) 691-4940
                  Email: j.forest@stahlzelloe.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Abbas Ghassemi, manager.

A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb15-13600.pdf


CASH STORE: Chapter 15 Case Summary
-----------------------------------
Chapter 15 Petitioner: FTI Consulting Canada Inc.

Chapter 15 Debtor: The Cash Store Financial Services Inc.
                   3400 Manulife Place
                   10130-101 Street
                   Edmonton AB T5J3S4

Chapter 15 Case No.: 15-12813

Type of Business: Provider of alternative financial products and
                  services to individuals that were generally
                  unable to obtain financing from traditional
                  sources.

Chapter 15 Petition Date: October 16, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York (Manhattan)

Judge: Hon. Michael E. Wiles

Chapter 15 Petitioner's Counsel: Kenneth P. Coleman, Esq.
                                 ALLEN & OVERY LLP
                                 1221 Avenue of Americas
                                 New York, NY 10022
                                 Tel: (212) 610-6300
                                 Fax: (212) 610-6399

Estimated Assets: $50 million to $100 million

Estimated Debts: $100 million to $500 million


CASH STORE: Seeks U.S. Recognition of Canadian Proceeding
---------------------------------------------------------
The Cash Store Financial Services Inc. is seeking recognition in
the United States of a proceeding under Canada's Companies'
Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36 pending before the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List.

FTI Consulting Canada Inc., the court-appointed monitor and
authorized foreign representative of Cash Store, filed under
Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
15-12813) on Oct. 16, 2015.  Cash Store estimated assets in the
range of $50 million to $100 million and liabilities of more than
$100 million.

The Monitor said it commenced the ancillary case in order to
expedite the implementation of a plan of compromise and arrangement
under the CCAA and permit distributions to creditors at the
earliest possible date.  

"It is important that certain releases provided in the Plan are
given full force and effect in the United States in light of the
pending US Securities Class Action," said Ken Coleman, Esq., at
Allen & Overy LLP, attorney for the Monitor.

Court documents indicate that the Cash Store Applicants have
formulated the Plan which has the support of the Monitor, the Ad
Hoc Secured Noteholders Committee (representing approximately 70%
of the Secured Noteholders), the Senior Secured Lenders, the
Securities Class Action Plaintiffs, the Consumer Class Action
Plaintiffs, and the other parties to certain settlements.  

Votes on the Plan are now being solicited and a hearing to consider
whether to sanction the Plan and thereby make it binding in Canada
is scheduled for Nov. 19, 2015.

                     The Canadian Proceeding

According to Mr. Coleman, prior to the commencement of the Canadian
Proceeding, Cash Store faced a number of challenges, including
regulatory issues affecting its core business strategy, multiple
class actions requiring defense across Canada and in the United
States, and cash flow problems, all of which resulted in a
significant deterioration in liquidity and the need to commence the
Canadian Proceeding for the benefit of all stakeholders.

Cash Store was a leading provider of alternative financial products
and services to individuals that were generally unable to obtain
financing from traditional sources.

Through its direct lending business, Cash Store acted as a payday
lender in Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Saskatchewan.
It also formerly acted as a direct lender in Manitoba and Ontario,
until it switched to offering line of
credit products in those jurisdictions.

Shortly before commencing the Canadian Proceeding, Cash Store's
business represented approximately 35 percent of Canada's C$2.5
billion payday lending market, Court documents indicate.

As a result of a bill which was enacted by the Canadian federal
government in May 2007, which provided that certain payday loans
were not subject to the criminal interest rate provisions of the
Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46, the payday loan market became
significantly more regulated, Mr. Coleman said.  This regulatory
overhaul which resulted in a diverse patchwork of legislation
hampered Cash Store's strategy to design a single business model
for its payday lending operations across Canada and drastically
increased regulatory costs, he added.

Cash Store's difficult financial position was further threatened by
multiple significant legal proceedings across Canada and in the
United States.  These proceedings include class actions in Canada
regarding its business model, primarily related to fees and
interest rates charged, and regarding its compliance with
securities laws in Canada and the United States.  These proceedings
exposed Cash Store to significantly increased legal costs and
potentially substantial liability, Mr. Coleman maintained.

The Securities Class Actions include actions in Alberta, Ontario,
and Quebec against Cash Store and certain of its directors and
officers alleging misrepresentations in its financial statements
during the period from Nov. 24, 2010, to Feb. 13, 2014, regarding
(i) internal controls over financial reporting and (ii) valuation
of certain items including a loan portfolio acquired from third
party lenders, losses on an internal consumer loan portfolio, and
liability associated with the settlement of a Consumer Class Action
in British Columbia.  In addition, Cash Store and certain D&Os are
defendants in a class action in the United States alleging
violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  The US
Securities Class Action is pending before Judge Marrero in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
and captioned Globis Capital Partners, L.P. et al. v. Cash Store
Financial Services, Inc. et al., 13 Civ. 3385 (S.D.N.Y.) (VM).

To combat these challenges, Cash Store established a Special
Committee of its Board of Directors on Feb. 19, 2014, advised by
its own legal counsel and financial advisors, and began exploring
options for a sale, restructuring, refinancing or liquidation.
The Sale Process continued during the Canadian Proceeding and
resulted in three separate asset sale transactions whereby the Cash
Store Applicants sold substantially all of their assets.

On April 14, 2014, Cash Store, The Cash Store Inc., TCS Cash Store
Inc., Instaloans Inc., 7252331 Canada Inc., 5515433 Manitoba Inc.,
and 1693926 Alberta Ltd. d/b/a "The Title Store" commenced the
Canadian Proceeding "to provide a breathing space to explore
restructuring options and avoid further erosion of value."  At the
commencement of the Canadian Proceeding, the Ontario Court issued
an Initial Order which (i) stayed proceedings against the Cash
Store Applicants, (ii) prevented parties from altering or
terminating agreements with the Cash Store Applicants, (iii)
appointed the Monitor, and (iv) authorized the Cash Store
Applicants to continue managing and operating their property,
restructure their business, and file the Plan.

CSF, The Cash Store Inc., TCS Cash Store Inc., and Instaloans Inc.
have formally changed their names and are currently registered as
the following Ontario and Alberta numbered companies: 1511419
Ontario Inc., 1545688 Alberta Inc., 986301 Alberta Inc., and
1152919 Alberta Inc.

At the commencement of the Canadian Proceeding, Cash Store did not
have sufficient cash to continue operations, Court documents
suggest.

                            Settlements

Together with the Ad Hoc Secured Noteholders Committee and the
Monitor, the Cash Store Applicants have engaged in negotiations
with various litigation claimants and other interested parties in
an effort to resolve (i) numerous claims made against the Cash
Store Applicants and their assets and (ii) numerous claims made by
the Cash Store Applicants against third party defendants.

The plaintiffs in the Securities Class Actions, the plaintiffs in
the Consumer Class Actions, Cash Store, and the D&Os, entered a
settlement agreement on Sept. 22, 2015, following two mediations
before the Honorable Mr. George Adams, a retired Justice of the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice.  Pursuant to the D&O/Insurer
Global Settlement Agreement, the D&Os will pay a total of
C$19,033,333 allocated as follows:

   (i) C$4,875,000 to settle the claims asserted by the
       Securities Class Action Plaintiffs against the D&Os on
       behalf of the Cash Store Applicants' shareholders;

  (ii) C$8,904,167 to settle the claims asserted by the
       Securities Class Action Plaintiffs against the D&Os on
       behalf of the Secured Noteholders;

(iii) C$1,437,500 to settle the claims asserted by the Ontario
       Consumer Class Action Plaintiffs against the D&Os;

  (iv) C$1,066,666 to settle the claims asserted by the Western
       Canada Consumer Class Action Plaintiffs against the D&Os;
       and  

   (v) C$2,750,000 to settle the claims asserted by the Cash
       Store Applicants against the D&Os, in exchange for the
       releases provided therein.

Specifically, the D&O/Insurer Global Settlement Agreement
contemplates the full reciprocal release of all claims in any way
related to Cash Store and its affiliates and subsidiaries among
CSF, the D&Os, 424187 Alberta Ltd. in its capacity as Senior
Secured Lender, the Securities Class Action Plaintiffs, the Ontario
Consumer Class Action Plaintiffs, the Western Canada Consumer Class
Action Plaintiffs, and William Aziz, in his capacity as the
court-appointed chief restructuring officer, on behalf of Cash
Store as plaintiff.

                             The Plan

The Cash Store Applicants have formulated the Plan which has the
support of the Monitor, the Ad Hoc Secured Noteholders Committee
(representing approximately 70% of the Secured Noteholders), the
Senior Secured Lenders, the Securities Class Action Plaintiffs, the
Consumer Class Action Plaintiffs, and the other parties to the
Settlements.  The purpose of the Plan is to, among other things,
(i) distribute proceeds of the Cash Store Applicants assets to
their secured creditors according to their priorities, (ii) provide
a central forum for the distribution of proceeds from the
Settlements to various stakeholders according to their interests
and entitlements, (iii) give effect to the releases contemplated
for the Released Parties in exchange for the settlement payments
made by those parties under the Settlements, and (iv) position the
Cash Store Applicants to continue pursuing the Remaining Estate
Claims for the benefit of stakeholders.

Two classes of Affected Creditor Claims are contemplated under the
Plan: (i) the Senior Lender Class, comprising the Senior Secured
Lenders, and (ii) the Secured Noteholder Class, comprising the
Secured Noteholders.  Only Affected Creditors are entitled to
attend and vote on the Plan.  The Plan provides the following
treatment for these classes:

   The Senior Lender Class.  Each Senior Secured Lender with an
   Allowed Senior Secured Credit Agreement Claim will receive
   payment in full of the outstanding principal owed to them plus
   accrued interest to the date of implementation of the Plan,
   less certain amounts to be paid as part of the Settlements.

   The Secured Noteholder Class.  Each Secured Noteholder will
   receive its pro rata share of the Cash Store Applicants' cash
   on hand following the payment to the Senior Lender Class and
   less certain reserves and other payments set forth in the
   Plan.  Each Secured Noteholder will also be entitled to its pro
   rata share of any proceeds recovered by the Cash Store
   Applicants following the implementation of the Plan, whether
   received by the Cash Store Applicants from the Remaining Estate

   Claims, tax refunds, reversions of the reserves or otherwise,
   to be distributed on a subsequent distribution date.

In the event that there are sufficient funds to pay the Secured
Noteholder Class in full, excess amounts will revert to the Cash
Store Applicants for distribution pursuant to a further order from
the Ontario Court.  In addition, the Plan provides for proceeds of
the Settlements to be allocated and distributed to the Consumer
Class Action Plaintiffs and the Securities Class Action Plaintiffs
under the terms of the Settlements.  

Certain categories of claims are Unaffected Claims which will not
be affected by or receive distributions under the Plan.  Unaffected
Claims are generally any claims other than the Senior Secured
Credit Agreement Claims, the Secured Noteholder Claims and the
Released Claims, including without limitation, all unsecured
claims.

Implementation of the Plan is conditioned on, among other things,
the entry of the Plan Sanction Order following receipt of the
requisite approval from the Affected Creditor Classes, the terms of
the Settlements having been approved by the courts overseeing the
relevant class actions, and the Bankruptcy Court's entry of an
order recognizing the Canadian Proceeding and enforcing the Plan
Sanction Order as it relates to the D&O/Insurer Global Settlement
Agreement.

In order for the Plan to be approved pursuant to the CCAA, the Plan
must be approved by a majority in number of Affected Creditors of
each Affected Creditor Class representing at least two thirds in
value of the Affected Creditor Claims of each Affected Creditor
Class.


CATASYS INC: Sells 6.7 Million Shares to Acuitas, et al.
--------------------------------------------------------
Catasys, Inc., entered into Stock Purchase Agreements with each of
Acuitas Group Holdings, LLC, 100% owned by Terren S. Peizer,
chairman and chief executive officer of the Company, Shamus, LLC, a
company owned by David E. Smith, a member of the Company's board of
directors, and Steve Gorlin, a member of the Company's board of
directors, pursuant to which the Company received gross proceeds of
$2,000,000 for the sale of approximately 6.7 million shares of the
Company's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, each at a
purchase price of $0.30 per share.

In addition, the Company and Acuitas entered into an amendment to
the 12% Original Issue Discount Convertible Debenture dated
July 30, 2015, which extended the maturity date of the Convertible
Debenture from Jan. 18, 2016, to Jan. 18, 2017, and extended the
date the Company must consummate a qualified public offering from
Dec. 31, 2015, to June 30, 2016.

                         About Catasys Inc.

Based in Los Angeles, California, Hythiam, Inc., n/k/a Catasys,
Inc., is a healthcare services management company, providing
through its Catasys(R) subsidiary specialized behavioral health
management services for substance abuse to health plans.

Catasys reported a loss of $27.3 million on $2.03 million of
healthcare services revenues for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2014,
compared to a loss of $4.67 million on $754,000 of healthcare
services revenues for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2013.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $1.91 million in total assets,
$7.17 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $5.26 million.

Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP, in Encino, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has continued
to incur significant operating losses and negative cash flows from
operations during the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.  These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


CCNG ENERGY: Court Extends Deadline to File Schedules Until Nov. 9
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas has
extended until Nov. 9, 2015, CCNG Energy Partners, LP, et al.'s
deadline to file their schedules of assets and liabilities and
statements of financial affairs.

                         About CCNG Energy

CCNG Energy Partners, L.P., Trinity Environmental SWD, L.L.C.,
Moss Bluff Property, L.L.C., Trinity Environmental Catarina SWD,
L.L.C., Trinity Environmental Services, L.L.C., Trinity
Environmental Titan Trucking, L.L.C., and CCNG Energy Partners GP,
L.L.C. filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
Proposed Lead Case No. 15-70136) on Oct. 12, 2015.  The petition
was signed by Daniel B. Porter as CEO of General Partner.

The Debtors estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of
$100 million to $500 million.

Taube Summers Harrison Taylor Meinzer Brown LLP serves as the
Debtors' counsel.

Judge Ronald B. King is assigned to the case.

The Debtors are engaged in the disposal of produced saltwater and
waste from the exploration and production of oil and gas.


CCNG ENERGY: Court Orders Joint Administration of Cases
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas
entered an order jointly administering the Chapter 11 cases of
CCNG Energy Partners, LP, CCNG Energy Partners GP, LLC, Moss Bluff

Property, LLC, Trinity Environmental Catarina SWD, LLC, Trinity
Environmental Services, LLC, Trinity Environmental SWD, LLC,
and Trinity Environmental Titan Trucking, LLC under In re
CCNG Energy Partners, LLC, Case No. 15-70136.

All proofs of claim shall be filed under the case number
representing the individual Debtor's estate against which the claim
is made.

Each of the Debtors will: (a) file separate monthly operating
reports; (b) maintain separate financial accounts and records; (c)
not be liable for the claims against any of the other Debtors; and
(d) file separate Bankruptcy Schedules and Statements of Financial
Affairs.

The Debtors are directed to file a master service list in In re
CCNG Energy Partners, LLC, Case No. 15-70136 that includes all
creditors, persons filing notices of appearances, and all
parties-in-interest in all of the Debtors' jointly administered
cases for
future noticing requirements.

Any response to the Motion was denied for the reasons stated on
the record.

                        About CCNG Energy

CCNG Energy Partners, L.P., et al., filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 15-70136) on Oct. 12,
2015.  The petition was signed by Daniel B. Porter as CEO of
General Partner.

The Debtors estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of
$100 million to $500 million.

Taube Summers Harrison Taylor Meinzer Brown LLP serves as the
Debtors' counsel.

Judge Ronald B. King is assigned to the case.

The Debtors are engaged in the disposal of produced saltwater and
waste from the exploration and production of oil and gas.


CCNG ENERGY: Dismissal of Operating Subsidiaries' Cases Sought
--------------------------------------------------------------
In separate motions filed with the Bankruptcy Court, Guggenheim
Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, and Pirinate
Consulting Group, as the newly appointed sole manager of the
Operating Subsidiaries, ask the Court to dismiss the Operating
Subsidiaries' bankruptcy cases for lack of corporate authority.

According to Guggenheim, only Pirinate has the corporate authority
to authorize the Operating Subsidiaries to seek relief under
Chapter 11.

"Despite the lack of corporate authority, the Parent took the
unilateral step to file each of the Debtors for bankruptcy not with
an eye towards an organized restructuring and achieving a "fresh
start" but rather in an effort to gain leverage in its negotiations
with Guggenheim," states Charles A. Beckham, Jr., Esq., at Haynes
and Boone, LLP, counsel for Guggenheim.

Pirinate says it has not and does not consent to the filing of the
petitions for the Operating Subsidiaries, and it has not had an
opportunity to attempt to reach a resolution with Guggenheim.  
Pirinate reveals the change in Manager was effectuated by
Guggenheim pursuant to remedies under its Pledge Agreement with the
Parent.

A hearing is scheduled for Oct. 28, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., to
consider approval of the Motion to Dismiss.

                    Pre-Petition Credit Facility

The Debtors entered into a $182 million senior secured credit
facility pursuant to that certain Third Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement, dated as of Aug. 25, 2014, among TES, Trinity
Environmental and the Parent, as Borrowers, Guggenheim, as
Administrative Agent, and the Lenders.  Pursuant to the terms of
the Pre-Petition Credit Facility, Guggenheim and the Pre-Petition
Lenders say they have outstanding obligations in the aggregate
amount of approximately $185.5 million.  The Pre-Petition Credit
Facility is scheduled to mature on May 17, 2018, unless the
maturity date is accelerated following the occurrence and
continuance of an Event of Default.

In connection with the Pre-Petition Credit Facility, Moss Bluff,
Catarina and Trucking, executed Guaranty Agreements in favor
of Guggenheim and the Pre-Petition Lenders, in which the Subsidiary
Guarantors guaranteed repayment of the Obligations under the
Pre-Petition Credit Facility.  The Obligations under the
Pre-Petition Credit Facility are secured by valid, properly
perfected, first priority liens against and security interests in
the following: (a) substantially all assets of the Borrowers and
the Subsidiary Guarantors, and (b) a pledge of the Parent's equity
interest in the Operating Subsidiaries.

                     Appointment of New Manager

Guggenheim said that following various pre-petition defaults by the
Debtors, it entered into lengthy negotiations to amend and modify
the Pre-Petition Credit Agreement.  As part of these negotiations,
the Debtors and Guggenheim entered into that certain
First Amendment and Forbearance Agreement, dated effective as of
June 30, 2015.  Notwithstanding this amendment and forbearance, the
Debtors were unable to make their required Sept. 1, 2015, interest
payment or satisfy their financial covenants.

"While Guggenheim was initially optimistic that it would reach a
consensual restructuring with the Debtors, the Debtors' negotiating
stance subsequently became inflexible and the Parent began to make
demands and take actions that were wholly inconsistent with the
months-long framework of the negotiations between the Debtors and
Guggenheim," Mr. Beckham tells the Court.
"While Guggenheim remains willing to re-engage in discussions to
address the financial issues facing the Debtors, it has neither the
obligation nor the willingness to entertain the notion of funding a
bankruptcy process initiated in knowing and willful violation of
the Operating Subsidiaries' Company Agreements," Mr. Beckham adds.

Based on management's change in negotiating position and
inconsistent actions, Guggenheim said it lost confidence in the
Parent's ability to manage the Operating Subsidiaries' affairs and
acted to protect its interests under Pre-Petition Credit Agreement
and, on Oct. 9, 2015, issued a Notice of Event of Default to the
Parent and the Operating Subsidiaries.

In the Notice of Default, Guggenheim notified the Debtors of
various Events of Default that occurred under the Pre-Petition
Credit Agreement as a result of the failure to pay the interest
payment due on Sept. 1, 2015, and the failure to satisfy financial
covenants for the fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2015, and June
30, 2015.  In addition, the Default Notice informed the Parent and
the Operating Subsidiaries that, as a result of the Designated
Defaults, the right to vote the membership
interests in each of the Operating Subsidiaries is now vested
exclusively in Guggenheim pursuant to section 7(e) of that certain
Second Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement dated as
of Jan. 31, 2014, by and among the Borrowers, the Subsidiary
Guarantors and Guggenheim.

As a result of the Designated Defaults, Guggenheim additionally
exercised its rights under section 7(e) of the Pledge Agreement and
issued Written Consents of Parent dated Oct. 9, 2015.  The Written
Consents, each effective as of Oct. 9, 2015:

  (a) removed Parent as sole manager of the Operating
      Subsidiaries;

  (b) appointed Pirinate Consulting Group, LLC, as the new sole
      manager of the Operating Subsidiaries; and

  (c) authorized an amendment to the Operating Subsidiaries'
      company agreement.

Pursuant to the Company Agreement Amendments dated Oct. 9, 2015,
Guggenheim exercised its rights pursuant to the Pledge Agreement
and, among other things, modified each Operating Subsidiary's
company agreement to require the sole manager's (now Pirinate)
prior written consent:

   (a) for such Operating Subsidiary to file for bankruptcy
       protection;

   (b) for any member of such Operating Subsidiary to take any
       action or have any power of authority with respect to such
       Operating Subsidiary; and

   (c) for any officer of such Operating Subsidiary to take any
       action or have any power of authority with respect to such
       Operating Subsidiary.

                         About CCNG Energy

CCNG Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Parent"), CCNG Energy Partners GP,
L.L.C. ("CCNG GP"), Trinity Environmental SWD, L.L.C., Trinity
Environmental Catarina SWD, L.L.C., Trinity Environmental Titan
Trucking, L.L.C., Moss Bluff Property, L.L.C. and Trinity
Environmental Services, L.L.C. (collectively, the "Operating
Subsidiaries") filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Proposed Lead Case No. 15-70136) on Oct. 12, 2015.  The
petition was signed by Daniel B. Porter as CEO of General Partner.

All of the Debtors' operations are performed by the Operating
Subsidiaries.

The Debtors estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of
$100 million to $500 million.

Taube Summers Harrison Taylor Meinzer Brown LLP serves as the
Debtors' counsel.

Judge Ronald B. King is assigned to the case.

The Debtors are engaged in the disposal of produced saltwater and
waste from the exploration and production of oil and gas.


CCNG ENERGY: Joint Administration of Cases Opposed
--------------------------------------------------
Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, and
Pirinate Consulting Group, LLC, as the newly appointed sole manager
of the Operating Subsidiaries, filed separate objections to CCNG
Energy Partners, L.P., et al.'s request for joint administration of
their Chapter 11 cases.

Guggenheim and Pirinate assert that the petitions for relief under
Chapter 11 were filed for the Operating Subsidiaries without
requisite corporate authority.  Guggenheim and Pirinate separately
filed motions with the Bankruptcy Court seeking the dismissal of
the Operating Subsidiaries' bankruptcy cases.

"The Court should deny the Joint Administration Motion with respect
to the Operating Subsidiaries because there is an inherent and
irreconcilable difference amongst the Debtors," says Charles A.
Beckham, Jr., Esq., at Haynes and Boone, LLP, counsel for
Guggenheim.  "The Parent and CCNG GP and the Operating Subsidiaries
have different management, as the Operating Subsidiaries are
properly managed by Pirinate," he maintains.

Mr. Beckham contends granting of the Joint Administration Motion
will not create efficiencies or conserve resources, as the
Operating Subsidiaries and the Parent and CCNG GP do not share
interests and the Operating Subsidiaries may take substantially
different positions on many matters than the Parent or CCNG GP.

Pirinate objects to the Joint Administration as the Operating
Subsidiaries have distinctly separate counsel, distinctly separate
management and separate goals.  

Pirinate and Guggenheim share the same view that the Dismissal
Motion should be heard and determined before any other actions are
taken in these Chapter 11 cases.

Guggenheim is represented by:

         Charles A. Beckham, Jr., Esq.
         Karl Burrer, Esq.
         Arsalan Muhammad, Esq.
         HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
         1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2100
         Houston, TX 77010
         Tel. No.: (713) 547-2000
         Fax. No.: (713) 547-2600
         E-mail: charles.beckham@haynesboone.com
                 karl.burrer@haynesboone.com
                 arsalan.muhammad@haynesboone.com

Pirinate is represented by:

         Deborah D. Williamson, Esq.
         DYKEMA COX SMITH
         112 East Pecan Street, Suite 1800
         San Antonio, Texas 78205
         Tel: (210) 554-5500
         Fax: (210) 226-8395
         E-mail: dwilliamson@dykema.com

                         About CCNG Energy

CCNG Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Parent"), CCNG Energy Partners GP,
L.L.C. ("CCNG GP"), Trinity Environmental SWD, L.L.C., Trinity
Environmental Catarina SWD, L.L.C., Trinity Environmental Titan
Trucking, L.L.C., Moss Bluff Property, L.L.C. and Trinity
Environmental Services, L.L.C. (collectively, the "Operating
Subsidiaries") filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Proposed Lead Case No. 15-70136) on Oct. 12, 2015.  The
petition was signed by Daniel B. Porter as CEO of General Partner.

All of the Debtors' operations are performed by the Operating
Subsidiaries.

The Debtors estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of
$100 million to $500 million.

Taube Summers Harrison Taylor Meinzer Brown LLP serves as the
Debtors' counsel.

Judge Ronald B. King is assigned to the case.

The Debtors are engaged in the disposal of produced saltwater and
waste from the exploration and production of oil and gas.


CCNG ENERGY: Section 341 Meeting Scheduled for Dec. 3
-----------------------------------------------------
A meeting of creditors in the bankruptcy cases of CCNG Energy
Partners, LP, et al., will be held on Dec. 3, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.
at Midland Room 124.  Proofs of claim are due by March 2, 2016.

This is the first meeting of creditors required under Section
341(a) of the Bankruptcy Code in all bankruptcy cases.

All creditors are invited, but not required, to attend.  This
meeting of creditors offers the one opportunity in a bankruptcy
proceeding for creditors to question a responsible office of the
Debtor under oath about the company's financial affairs and
operations that would be of interest to the general body of
creditors.

                         About CCNG Energy

CCNG Energy Partners, L.P., Trinity Environmental SWD, L.L.C.,
Moss Bluff Property, L.L.C., Trinity Environmental Catarina SWD,
L.L.C., Trinity Environmental Services, L.L.C., Trinity
Environmental Titan Trucking, L.L.C., and CCNG Energy Partners GP,
L.L.C. filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
Proposed Lead Case No. 15-70136) on Oct. 12, 2015.  The petition
was signed by Daniel B. Porter as CEO of General Partner.

The Debtors estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of
$100 million to $500 million.

Taube Summers Harrison Taylor Meinzer Brown LLP serves as the
Debtors' counsel.

Judge Ronald B. King is assigned to the case.


CCNG ENERGY: Wants to Use Guggenheim's Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
CCNG Energy Partners, LP, et al., seek permission from the
Bankruptcy Court to use cash collateral securing their indebtedness
to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, in order to pay normal and
necessary operating expenses in connection with their business.

CCNG Energy Partners, LP, Trinity Environmental Services, LLC, and
Trinity Environmental SWD, LLC are all primary obligors on the
approximately $176 million debt to the lenders represented by
Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent.  Moss
Bluff Property, LLC, Trinity Environmental Catarina SWD, LLC, and
Trinity Environmental Titan Trucking, LLC guaranteed and pledged
assets securing the Guggenheim Debt.

The Guggenheim Debt is documented by, inter alia, a Credit
Agreement dated Oct. 9, 2012, an Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated May 17, 2013, a Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated Jan. 31, 2014, and a Third Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement dated Aug. 25, 2014.

The indebtedness owed under the Guggenheim Facility is secured by
substantially all of the Debtors' assets, including accounts and
accounts receivable.

The Debtors offer Guggenheim "adequate protection" in the form of
"post-petition lien and all collateral which was pledged to the
lienholder and was properly perfected, pre-petition."

Guggenheim believes the Collateral may be worth less than the
Obligations.  Thus, Guggenheim asks the Court to deny the Debtors'
request to use cash collateral saying the Debtors have not met
their burden to demonstrate they can provide adequate protection.


"Given the value of the Collateral and the total lack of prospects
for the reorganization of these Debtors, such offer is
insufficient," says Charles A. Beckham, Jr., Esq., at Haynes and
Boone, LLP, counsel for Guggenheim.

Pirinate Consulting Group, LLC, as the newly appointed manager for
each of the Operating Subsidiaries, believes that the majority (if
not all) of the cash which is the subject of the Cash Collateral
Motion is generated from operations of the Operating Subsidiaries.
According to Pirinate, the Operating Subsidiaries do not want their
cash flow to be used to support the Parent or its General Partner.

                         About CCNG Energy

CCNG Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Parent"), CCNG Energy Partners GP,
L.L.C. ("CCNG GP"), Trinity Environmental SWD, L.L.C., Trinity
Environmental Catarina SWD, L.L.C., Trinity Environmental Titan
Trucking, L.L.C., Moss Bluff Property, L.L.C. and Trinity
Environmental Services, L.L.C. (collectively, the "Operating
Subsidiaries") filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Proposed Lead Case No. 15-70136) on Oct. 12, 2015.  The
petition was signed by Daniel B. Porter as CEO of General Partner.

All of the Debtors' operations are performed by the Operating
Subsidiaries.

The Debtors estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of
$100 million to $500 million.

Taube Summers Harrison Taylor Meinzer Brown LLP serves as the
Debtors' counsel.

Judge Ronald B. King is assigned to the case.

The Debtors are engaged in the disposal of produced saltwater and
waste from the exploration and production of oil and gas.


CEETOP INC: Stops Operations of Hangzhou Tuoyin Unit
----------------------------------------------------
Ceetop Inc., on Oct. 13, 2015, decided to cease operations of its
subsidiary Hangzhou Tuoyin Management Consulting Co., Ltd. and to
terminate the corporate existence of Hangzhou Tuoyin, according to
a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                         About Ceetop Inc.

Oregon-based Ceetop Inc., formerly known as China Ceetop.com,
Inc., owned and operated the online retail platform before 2013.
Due to excessive competition in online retail, the Company has
transformed itself into an integrated supply chain services
provider, and focuses on B to B supply chain management and
related value-added services among enterprises.

Ceetop Inc. reported a net loss of $841,000 on $362,000 of sales
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared with a net loss of $2.88
million on $0 of sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $3.52 million in total
assets, $956,000 in total liabilities, all current, and $2.56
million in total stockholders' equity.

MJF & Associates, APC, in Los Angeles, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company incurred
recurring losses from operations, has a net loss of $841,000 for
2014, and has accumulated deficit of $9.45 million at Dec. 31,
2014.  These matters raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


CENTRAL AMERICA BOTTLING: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' IDR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed The Central America Bottling
Corporation's (CBC) ratings:

   -- Foreign currency long-term Issuer Default Rating at 'BB+';
   -- Local currency long-term IDR at 'BB+';
   -- USD300 million senior unsecured notes due in 2022 at 'BB+'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

CBC's ratings reflect the company's business position as an anchor
bottler of the PepsiCo system with operations in Central America,
the Caribbean, Ecuador and its recent acquisition in Peru.  The
company has a diversified product portfolio of PepsiCo brands as
well as proprietary brands across its franchised territories,
combined with a broad distribution network.  The ratings also
benefit from the company's good operating performance, stable
leverage metrics and adequate liquidity.  CBC's ratings are
constrained by higher than historical debt levels related to
mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and investment projects.  In
addition, the company's operations are exposed to the sovereign
ratings where it operates and the volatility of prices in its main
raw materials.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Leading Position in Core Markets

Fitch believes CBC's brand portfolio, distribution network, and
management's abilities to design and execute commercial strategies
will support its business position in the future.  The company has
maintained relatively stable market share positions in key
territories as Guatemala and Jamaica where the company has the
leading brand in the carbonated soft drink category.  In addition,
CBC's non-carbonated beverages portfolio, particularly water,
juices and nectars, isotonics and tea, hold important positions in
most of its markets.

Positive Operating Performance

Fitch expects CBC's revenues to grow in the mid- to high-single
digits in 2015-2016 due mainly to its acquisition of PepsiCo
bottling operations in Peru from Ambev in the second semester of
2015 and, in a lesser extent, to organic growth.  During the first
half of 2015, the company's total volume increased 5% to 205
million unit cases, while net sales increased 10% to USD680
million, when compared to the same period of 2014.  EBITDA margin
was relatively stable at 11.7%.  These figures exclude the Peruvian
operations that will be consolidated during the second half of
2015.

Negative FCF

Fitch forecasts that CBC will maintain a negative free cash flow
(FCF) generation in 2015 after planned capital expenditures of
USD87 million and dividends payments of USD25 million.  While this
is contrary to the agency's previous FCF expectation, the variation
will come mainly from additional capex to improve the operations in
Peru.  Fitch expects the company to generate positive FCF over the
medium term due to lower capex and stable dividend payments
starting 2016.  The forecasted positive FCF generation should
support the company's ability to pay down debt.

Stable Leverage

CBC's leverage should remain relatively stable in the next 18 to 24
months despite the recent acquisition of Peru.  For the acquisition
of the Peruvian operations and the planned capex the company will
obtain USD60 million of additional debt that will result in leaving
its total debt around USD520 million by year end 2015.  Fitch
projects for 2015 a total debt to EBITDA and net debt to EBITDA
close to 2.8x and 2.5x, respectively, including half year results
of Peru.  For 2016 the company's leverage should gradually
strengthen in the absence of strategic acquisitions.  For the last
12 months as of June 30, 2015, the company's estimated total debt
to EBITDA and net debt to EBITDA were 2.9x and 2.5x, respectively.

Fitch also considers that CBC exposure to USD denominated debt is
manageable.  Approximately 78% of CBC's total debt million was
dollar denominated at the end of June 2015.  The company does not
contemplate to hedge its foreign currency debt service as it
generated around 55% of its revenues in U.S. dollars and maintained
approximately 45% of its cash balance in U.S. dollars as of June
30, 2015.

Exposure to Guatemala's Sovereign Ratings

CBC has exposure to the risks associated with the economic and
political environment of the countries where it operates. Guatemala
('BB'/Outlook Stable) is CBC's main market in terms of sales and
EBITDA generation and the company's operating performance is likely
to depend on the stability and economic development of this
country.  While the last sovereign downgrade in June 2014 resulted
in a downgrade of the country ceiling of Guatemala to 'BB+' from
'BBB-', it did not impact the ratings of CBC, given its stable
credit profile and access to cash flow generation from dollar-based
economies (Ecuador, El Salvador and Puerto Rico), further
deterioration of the country's ratings will likely result in a
negative rating action.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for CBC include:

   -- Revenue growth in mid- to high single-digit in 2015-2016
      including acquisition of Peru;

   -- EBITDA margins around 13% in 2015 and 2016;

   -- Negative FCF generation in 2015 and positive over the medium

      term;

   -- Total debt to EBITDA trending down below 2.5x by 2016,
      excluding acquisitions.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

The ratings of CBC could be negatively pressured by the following
factors: a downgrade in Guatemala's country ceiling, deterioration
of its operating results, negative FCF generation, or significant
debt-financed acquisitions that result in a total debt to EBITDA
above 3x on a sustained basis.

Fitch does not foresee positive ratings actions for CBC in the
mid-term; however, the combination of lower leverage ratios, better
operating performance, solid FCF generation across the cycle and
cash flow generation from investment-grade countries will be
considered positive to credit quality.

LIQUIDITY

Adequate Liquidity

CBC's liquidity is manageable given its current cash balances of
USD69 million and USD95 million of short-term debt as of June 30,
2015.  The company has also a funds from operations (FFO) capacity
of around USD100 million annually and has non-committed credit
lines of around USD30 million.  With debt amortization of USD40
million in 2016, USD23 million in 2017, USD25 million in 2018 and
USD24 million in 2019, Fitch believes CBC has financial flexibility
to face its debt profile.



CHOA DAYTON: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
----------------------------------------------
Debtor: Choa Dayton, LLC
        15720 Ventura Blvd., Suite 405
        Encino, CA 91436

Case No.: 15-13447

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 15, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (San Fernando Valley)

Debtor's Counsel: Blake J Lindemann, Esq.
                  LINDEMANN LAW FIRM
                  433 N Camden Dr 4th Fl
                  Beverly Hills, CA 90210
                  Tel: 310-279-5269
                  Fax: 310-300-0267
                  Email: blindemann@llgbankruptcy.com
                         blake@lawbl.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Daniel Tepper, member.

The Debtor did not include a list of its largest unsecured
creditors when it filed the petition.


COMMUNITY ACADEMY: S&P Raises Rating on 2007 Revenue Bonds to 'BB+'
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services raised its rating on District of
Columbia's series 2007 tax-exempt fixed-rate revenue bonds, issued
for Community Academy Public Charter School (CAPCS), seven notches
to 'BB+' from 'CCC' and removed the rating from CreditWatch, where
it was placed with developing implications on Feb. 3, 2015.  The
outlook is stable.

This action reflects Standard & Poor's view of the absorption of
two CAPCS campuses, formerly known as Amos 5 and Nicholson Online,
by Friendship Public Charter School (FPCS), and FPCS' subsequent
assumption of the series 2007 CAPCS debt as of June 30, 2015.  The
series 2007 debt is now a legal obligation of FPCS, secured by the
revenue of two CAPCS campuses and the real estate of one campus.

On Feb. 19, 2015, the District of Columbia Public Charter School
Board voted unanimously to revoke CAPCS' charter agreement on
account of fiscal mismanagement, with the revocation effective June
30, 2015.  This decision was later upheld by a Superior Court
judge. On June 30, 2015, FPCS, a large charter school with nine
campuses operating throughout Washington D.C., entered into a legal
agreement to assume the CAPCS debt and absorb the two campuses.
Following the absorption, the former CAPCS campuses were rebranded
to Friendship Armstrong and Friendship Online to reflect the change
in management, with their charter expiration date updated to
reflect Friendship's expiration date of July 2028.

"The stable outlook reflects our belief that the school will meet
fiscal 2016 projections and fully integrate into the FPCS
organization," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Stephanie
Wang.  "If enrollment grows, academics improve, and financial
metrics grow to levels more commensurate with medians for a higher
rating, we could further raise the rating.  Conversely, if actual
fiscal 2016 financials fall well short of expectations, with
maximum annual debt service coverage below 1.0x and unplanned draws
on FPCS' unrestricted liquid assets account, we could lower the
rating."

Under the agreement, FPCS must continue to meet the prior covenants
from the 2007 bonds.



DAYBREAK OIL: Posts $569,000 Net Loss for Second Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------
Daybreak Oil and Gas, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
available to common shareholders of $568,936 on $369,834 of oil and
natural gas sales revenue for the three months ended Aug. 31, 2015,
compared to net income available to common shareholders of $81,052
on $1.04 million of oil and natural gas sales revenue for the same
period during the prior year.

For the six months ended Aug. 31, 2015, the Company reported a net
loss available to common shareholders of $1.12 million on $811,118
of oil and natural gas sales revenue compared to a net loss
available to common shareholders of $210,068 on $1.85 million of
oil and natural gas sales revenue for the same period a year ago.

As of Aug. 31, 2015, the Company had $10.84 million in total
assets, $17.07 million in total liabilities and a $6.23 million
total stockholders' deficit.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        http://is.gd/qH0vbc

                        About Daybreak Oil

Daybreak Oil and Gas, Inc., is an independent oil and natural gas
exploration, development and production company.  The Company is
headquartered in Spokane, Washington and has an operations office
in Friendswood, Texas.  The Company's common stock is quoted on
the OTC Bulletin Board market under the symbol DBRM.OB.  Daybreak
has over 20,000 acres under lease in the San Joaquin Valley of
California.

Daybreak Oil reported a net loss available to common shareholders
of $866,000 on $3.08 million of oil and natural gas sales for the
year ended Feb. 28, 2015, compared to a net loss available to
common shareholders of $1.54 million on $1.8 million of oil and
natural gas sales for the year ended Feb. 28, 2014.

MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Feb. 28, 2015, citing that the Company suffered losses from
operations and has negative operating cash flows, which raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


DDR CORP: Fitch Assigns 'BB' Preferred Stock Rating
---------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of 'BBB-' to the $400 million
of 4.25% senior unsecured 10-year notes due 2026 issued by DDR
Corp. (NYSE: DDR).  The company expects to use the net proceeds to
pay down a portion of its revolving credit facility balance.  The
notes were issued at 99.094% of par to yield 4.361%.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

DDR's 'BBB-' IDR takes into account the company's credit strengths
including ongoing improvements in the quality of the company's
retail property portfolio and the management team's focus on
refining the asset base and simplifying the business.  DDR benefits
from strong expected fixed-charge coverage for the rating, a
granular tenant roster with select quality credit tenants, and
proven access to various sources of capital.  Fitch anticipates
leverage will remain at the higher end of the range Fitch considers
appropriate for the 'BBB-' rating over the next 12-to-24 months.

Credit concerns include a liquidity coverage ratio of below 1.0x
assuming no access to external capital sources and when taking into
account the company's development pipeline.  In addition, DDR
continues to grow its unencumbered pool, but Fitch projects that
unencumbered asset coverage of unsecured debt will remain weak for
the 'BBB-' rating.

Improving Asset Quality

DDR is executing on its strategic plan, which entails owning and
operating market-dominant power centers in select markets with
favorable population demographics and thereby generating consistent
cash flow, while opportunistically engaging in capital recycling.
Portfolio transformation is evidenced by the presence of more
market-dominant power centers, with the average property size
increasing to approximately 330,000 square feet as of June 30, 2015
compared to approximately 190,000 square feet as of
Dec. 31, 2008.  In addition, the leased rate improved to 95.8% as
of June 30, 2015 from 92.2% in 2008, and average rent per square
foot increased to $14.37 in second quarter 2015 (2Q'15) from $12.34
as of Dec. 31, 2008.

DDR, led by its new Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, initiated changes in its investment strategy by
accelerating disposition plans for lower quality assets, and
expected sales should result in an improved credit profile.  The
company estimates that the to-be-sold assets are located in markets
with weaker demographics with household income and population
levels that are approximately 20% to 30% lower than the remaining
assets.  Net proceeds from asset sales will be used primarily
towards funding acquisitions and development.

Ongoing Portfolio Review and Simplification

DDR segmented the portfolio by examining market and asset factors.
This analysis was predicated on the company's focus on power
centers based on the belief that they have greater scale, a larger
mix of tenants and serve larger trade areas than grocery-anchored
neighborhood shopping centers.  Currently, DDR's portfolio
demographics are weaker than those of other U.S. shopping center
REITs, as measured by population density and average household
income.

Strong Leasing Spreads and Fixed Charge Coverage

Blended leasing spreads on new and renewal leases were 10.0% in
1H15 following 9.1% growth in 2014, 8.3% growth in 2013 and 6.7%
growth in 2012.  New lease rates averaged $18.74 in 1H15.  Though
this level is below expiring rents for the remainder of 2015, it
exceeds the weighted average for 2016 - 2017 lease expirations,
indicative of future positive leasing spreads.  As of June 30,
2015, 2.9% of leases expire for the remainder of 2015 followed by
11.6% in 2016 and 13.2% in 2017.  Consolidated same-store NOI grew
by 3.0% in 2Q'15, 2.9% in 2014, 3.1% in 2013 and 3.7% in 2012.

DDR's fixed-charge coverage ratio was 2.5x for the second quarter
of 2015 (also 2.5x for the trailing twelve months ended June 30,
2015), up from 2.4x for 2014 and 2.3x in 2013.  Organic EBITDA
growth and re-development EBITDA growth were the primary
contributors to the improvement.  Under Fitch's base case whereby
the company generates 3% same-store NOI growth in 2015 (due to
positive releasing spreads and a minor uptick in occupancy)
followed by a slight moderation in 2016 - 2017, fixed charge
coverage would be in the mid-to-high-2x range, which would be
strong for the 'BBB-' rating.  In a stress case not anticipated by
Fitch in which same-store NOI declines by levels experienced in
2009 - 2010, fixed-charge coverage would remain in the low-to-mid
2x range, which would remain solid for the 'BBB-' rating.  Fitch
defines fixed-charge coverage as recurring operating EBITDA
including recurring cash distributions from unconsolidated entities
less recurring capital expenditures and straight-line rent
adjustments, divided by total interest incurred and preferred stock
dividends.

Secular Retailer Trends Favor Power Centers

DDR has limited tenant concentration.  Major tenants are TJX
Companies (3.4% of rental revenues in 2Q'15), Bed Bath & Beyond
(3.0%), PetSmart (3.0%), Walmart (Fitch IDR of 'AA' with a Stable
Outlook at 2.6%), and Kohl's (Fitch IDR of 'BBB+' with a Stable
Outlook at 2.3%).  The top 10 and 20 tenants comprise 24.1% and
35.5%, respectively, of 2Q'15 rental revenues.  Numerous retailers
are exploring larger footprints, which should bolster power center
demand.  Value/convenience retailers continue to grow, while
non-traditional grocers have gained the market share of traditional
retailers, which bodes well for DDR's tenants such as Walmart and
Whole Foods.

Proven Access to Capital

DDR is a seasoned issuer of multiple sources of capital.  Since
2006, the company has issued approximately $4 billion of bonds
(prior to this issuance, the latest was a January offering of $500
million of 3.625% 10-year notes), $350 million of preferred stock,
and approximately $4.3 billion of equity via follow-on common
offerings and at-the-market program issuance at a weighted average
premium to consensus mean net asset value of 3.4% according to SNL
Financial.  In April 2015, DDR recast its primary $750 million
unsecured revolving credit facility, extending the final maturity
date to June 2020, including options, and reducing the pricing on
the facility by 15 basis points to LIBOR plus 100 basis points. The
company also recast its smaller credit facility to $50 million from
$65 million under the same pricing terms and entered into a $400
million unsecured term loan, with pricing currently set at LIBOR
plus 110 basis points.

Leverage at the High End of Range for 'BBB-'

Leverage was 7.3x in 2Q15 (also 7.3x for the TTM ended June 30,
2015), down from 7.5x in 2014 and 8.2x in 2013.  Leverage was
skewed upward for full-year 2013 due to the timing of the company's
October 2013 acquisition of a portfolio of 30 power centers
previously owned by a joint venture with Blackstone Real Estate
Partners VII L.P. for $1.46 billion.  Fitch projects that leverage
will be between 7.0x and 7.5x over the next 12-to-24 months, which
would be at the high end of the range appropriate for the 'BBB-'
rating, principally due to organic EBITDA growth. In the
above-mentioned stress case, leverage would exceed 7.5x, which
would be inconsistent with an investment-grade rating.  Fitch
defines leverage as debt less readily available cash divided by
recurring operating EBITDA including recurring cash distributions
from unconsolidated entities.

2015 Debt Maturities and Development Negatively Impact Liquidity

Pro forma liquidity coverage when accounting for the unsecured
issuance is adequate at 1.0x for the period July 1, 2015 to
Dec. 31, 2016.  Fitch defines liquidity coverage as sources divided
by uses.  Liquidity sources include the estimated net proceeds from
DDR's expected $400 million unsecured bond issuance, readily
available cash, availability under the company's unsecured
revolving credit facilities post-April 2015 amendments, the
company's $100 million remaining undrawn term loan commitment, and
projected retained cash flows from operating activities.  Liquidity
uses include pro rata debt maturities, projected recurring capital
expenditures and cost to complete development through 2016.  The
liquidity coverage ratio is weighed down by 2015 debt maturities,
which total 9.6% of total debt pro forma.

The company's AFFO payout ratio was 65.3% in 2Q'15, up from 62.6%
in 2014 and 61.2% in 2013.  Based on the current payout ratio, the
company retains approximately $130 million annually in internally
generated liquidity.

Cost-to-complete development represented 3.1% of undepreciated
assets as of June 30, 2015, up from 1.9% as of year-end 2013 and
0.7% as of year-end 2012 but below the 3.5% level as of year-end
2007.  Overall, redevelopment should improve asset quality and cash
flow growth as DDR generally targets unlevered cash on cost in
excess of 10%.

Low Unencumbered Asset Coverage

As of June 30, 2015, DDR's unencumbered assets (defined as
unencumbered NOI divided by a stressed 8% capitalization rate)
covered net unsecured debt by 1.8x, which is low for the 'BBB-'
rating.  Unencumbered asset coverage has trended around 1.6x-1.8x
over the past several years and Fitch expects the ratio to remain
flat through 2016, absent equity-funded acquisitions of
unencumbered real estate.  DDR continues to add quality assets to
the unencumbered pool and the quality of the unencumbered pool is
similar to that of the encumbered pool.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

The key assumptions for DDR in Fitch's base case include:

   -- 3% same-store NOI growth in 2015 followed by 2.5% growth in
      2016 and 2.0% in 2017;

   -- Interest income growth to $28 million through 2017 stemming
      from the BRE DDR Retail Holdings III and Blackstone II
      acquisition transactions in 2014;

   -- G&A to decline slightly relative to total revenues as the
      company endeavors to focus on fewer larger assets via
      expected asset sales;

   -- $440 million of dispositions in 2015 followed by $100
      million total in 2016 - 2017 at 7.5% cap rates;

   -- $500 million of acquisitions and development in 2015
      followed by $400 million in 2016 and $350 million in 2017 at

      blended 8.5% stabilized yields;

   -- Debt repayment with the issuance of new unsecured bonds;

   -- Recurring capex divided by recurring operating EBITDA in the

      7% - 8% range;

   -- $100 million of equity issuance in 2015 with no additional
      issuance through 2017 and an AFFO payout ratio of
      approximately 65% - 70% through 2017; however, equity
      issuance is at management's discretion and Fitch notes that
      DDR's common shares are currently trading at an 13.5%
      discount to consensus mean net asset value according to SNL
      Financial.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

These factors may have a positive impact on DDR's ratings and/or
Outlook:

   -- Fitch's expectation of leverage sustaining below 6.5x is the

      primary factor for positive momentum on the ratings and/or
      Outlook, since this metric is more consistent through
      interest rate cycles (June 30, 2015 TTM leverage was 7.3x);

   -- Fitch's expectation of growth in the size and quality of the

      unencumbered pool with unencumbered assets (unencumbered NOI

      divided by a stressed capitalization rate of 8.0%) covering
      net unsecured debt by 2.5x (this metric is 1.8x as of
      June 30, 2015);

   -- Fitch's expectation of fixed-charge coverage sustaining
      above 2.3x is a less meaningful ratings sensitivity for
      positive momentum as it is less consistent through interest
      rate cycles (TTM fixed-charge coverage is 2.5x).

These factors may have a negative impact on DDR's ratings and/or
Outlook:

   -- Fitch's expectation of leverage sustaining above 7.5x;

   -- Fitch's expectation of fixed-charge coverage sustaining
      below 2.0x;

   -- Base-case liquidity coverage sustaining below 1.0x (this
      ratio is 1.0x for July 1, 2015 to Dec. 31, 2016).

FULL LIST OF RATINGS

Fitch currently rates DDR:

   -- IDR 'BBB-';
   -- Unsecured revolving credit facilities 'BBB-';
   -- Unsecured term loan 'BBB-';
   -- Senior unsecured notes 'BBB-';
   -- Senior unsecured convertible notes 'BBB-';
   -- Preferred stock 'BB'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.



DOMARK INTERNATIONAL: Needs More Time to File Aug. 31 Form 10-Q
---------------------------------------------------------------
Domark International, Inc., notified the Securities and Exchange
Commission that it could not complete the filing of its quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended Aug. 31, 2015, due to a
delay in obtaining and compiling information required to be
included in the Company's Form 10-Q, which delay could not be
eliminated by the Company without unreasonable effort and expense.


In accordance with Rule 12b-25 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the Company will file its Form 10-Q no later than
the fifth calendar day following the prescribed due date.

                    About Domark International

Based in Lake Mary, Florida, DoMark International, Inc., was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 30,
2006.  The Company was formed to engage in the acquisition and
refinishing of aged furniture using exotic materials and then
reselling it through interior decorators, high-end consignment
shops and online sales.  The Company abandoned its original
business of exotic furniture sales in May of 2008 and pursued the
acquisition of entities to best bring value to the company and its
shareholders.

For the nine months ended Feb. 28, 2015, the Company reported a net
loss of $1.86 million on $0 of sales compared to a net loss of
$2.34 million on $0 of sales for the same period a year ago.

As of May 31, 2015, the Company had $1.3 million in total assets,
$4.6 million in total liabilities and $3.3 million total
stockholders' deficit.

                   Liquidity and Capital Resources

"Our operating requirements have been funded primarily through
financing facilities and sales of our common stock.  The Company
will continue to require financing from loans and notes payable
until such time our business has generated income sufficient to
carry our operating costs," the Company states in its annual report
for the year ended May 31, 2015.


ELBIT IMAGING: Repurchases Notes for NIS5.24M
---------------------------------------------
Elbit Imaging Ltd. announced that with regards to the Board of
Directors resolution to approve a notes' Buy-Back plan of the
Company's series H and I Notes which are traded on the Tel Aviv
Stock Exchange, the repurchases of the following Notes was executed
since Oct. 12, 2015:

                          Note: Series H

         Acquiring Corporation: Elbit Imaging Ltd.

Quantity purchased (Par value): 6,021,801   

     Weighted average price: 87.01

       Total Amount Paid (NIS): 5,239,706  

                         About Elbit Imaging

Tel-Aviv, Israel-based Elbit Imaging Ltd. (TASE, NASDAQ: EMITF)
holds investments in real estate and medical companies.  The
Company, through its subsidiaries, also develops shopping and
entertainment centers in Central Europe and invests in and manages
hotels.

Since February 2013, Elbit has intensively endeavored to come to
an arrangement with its creditors.  Elbit has said it has been
hanging by a thread for more than five months.  It has encountered
cash flow difficulties and this burdens its day to day activities,
and it certainly cannot make the necessary investments to improve
its assets.  In light of the arrangement proceedings, and
according to the demands of most of the bondholders, as well as an
agreement that was signed on March 19, 2013, between Elbit and the
Trustees of six out of eight series of bonds, Elbit is prohibited,
inter alia, from paying off its debts to the financial creditors
-- and as a result a petition to liquidate Elbit was filed, and
Bank Hapoalim has declared its debts immediately payable,
threatening to realize pledges that were given to the Bank on
material assets of the Company -- and Elbit undertook not to sell
material assets of the Company and not to perform any transaction
that is not during its ordinary course of business without giving
an advance notice to the trustees.

Accountant Rony Elroy has been appointed as expert for examining
the debt arrangement in the Company.

In July 2013, Elbit Imaging's controlling shareholders, Europe-
Israel MMS Ltd. and Mr. Mordechay Zisser, notified the Company
that the Tel Aviv District Court has appointed Adv. Giroa Erdinast
as a receiver with regards to the ordinary shares of the Company
held by Europe Israel securing Europe Israel's obligations under
its loan agreement with Bank Hapoalim B.M.  The judgment stated
that the Receiver is not authorized to sell the Company's shares
at this stage.  Following a request of Europe-Israel, the Court
also delayed any action to be taken with regards to the sale of
those shares for a period of 60 days.  Europe Israel and
Mr. Zisser have also notified the Company that they utterly reject
the Bank's claims and intend to appeal the Court's ruling.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had NIS 2.8 billion in total
assets, NIS 2.5 billion in total liabilities and NIS 338.3 million
in shareholders' equity.


ENERGY & EXPLORATION: In Debt Discussions with Lenders
------------------------------------------------------
Laura J. Keller, writing for Bloomberg News, reported that
creditors of Energy & Exploration Partners Inc. are in confidential
talks to reorganize the company's debt as oil prices hover below
$50 per barrel, according to two people with knowledge of the
matter.

According to the report, GoldenTree Asset Management and Beach
Point Capital Management are among the investment firms in
negotiations to restructure the oil and natural gas producer's $1.1
billion of borrowings, said the people.  Energy & Exploration
Partners, or ENXP, sold the debt in July 2014, the last month oil
cost more than $100 a barrel, the report noted.

In the last few weeks, GoldenTree and Beach Point, which own loans
and junior-ranked notes, have sought to advance a plan that would
seek to preserve the value of their holdings while helping to
reduce the Fort Worth, Texas-based company's debt burden, the
people said, the report related.  The firm's borrowings consist of
a $765 million term loan and $375 million of 8 percent subordinated
convertible notes, the report added.


ENERGY FUTURE: Judge to Limit Time in Plan Confirmation Hearing
---------------------------------------------------------------
Matt Chiappardi at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that a Delaware
bankruptcy judge said on Oct. 15, 2015, that he will limit the
amount of time sides have to present their cases when Energy Future
Holdings Corp.'s massive Chapter 11 confirmation hearing launches
in November, potentially shortening the overall time for a
proceeding that's already been whittled down by half.

During a hearing in Wilmington, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher
S. Sontchi said that sides will have a time limit when they argue
over the power giant's plan to rework $42 billion in debt.

                 About Energy Future Holding Corp.

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is A
privately held diversified energy holding company with a Portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.

Oncor, an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the
Largest regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth.  EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating
whilereducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).  The Debtors are seeking to have their cases
jointly
administered for procedural purposes.

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion.  The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal.  The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,
and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP,
as

legal advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor.  The

EFH equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for
the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is represented by
Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in
the case.  The Committee represents the interests of the unsecured
creditors of ONLY of Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company
LLC; EFCH's direct subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings
Company LLC; and EFH Corporate Services Company, and of no other
debtors.  The Committee has selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and
Polsinelli PC for representation in this high-profile energy
restructuring.  The lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck,
Esq., Brett H. Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at
Morrison & Foerster LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K.
Edelson, Esq., Shanti M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at
Polsinelli PC.


ENERGY FUTURE: Texas Regulator Seeks Answers Over Oncor Sale
------------------------------------------------------------
Harry R. Weber, writing for Bloomberg News, reported that Hunt
Consolidated Inc. and a group of bondholders in Energy Future
Holdings Corp.'s bankruptcy case were urged on Oct. 15 to provide
answers to more than 75 questions before regulators vote on their
planned takeover of the Oncor electricity-distribution business.

According to the report, among the issues raised by the Texas
Public Utility Commission are whether the benefits of the sale
exceed the costs and how customers will be affected.  Regulators
also want to know if safeguards need to be put in place to ensure
the new owners are able to carry the debt they will be taking on,
the report related.

"You've got to see something that indicates that, 'Yes, this
structure will be sustainable,'" PUC Commissioner Ken said at a
hearing in Austin, which was broadcast onAnderson the agency's
website, the report further related.  Commission Chairman Donna
Nelson agreed more details are needed, although she cautioned that
she doesn't want anything to hold up Oncor parent Energy Future's
exit from bankruptcy, the report added.

                 About Energy Future Holding Corp.

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is A
privately held diversified energy holding company with a Portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.

Oncor, an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the
Largest regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth.  EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating
whilereducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).  The Debtors are seeking to have their cases
jointly
administered for procedural purposes.

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion.  The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal.  The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,
and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP,
as

legal advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor.  The

EFH equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for
the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is represented by
Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in
the case.  The Committee represents the interests of the unsecured
creditors of ONLY of Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company
LLC; EFCH's direct subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings
Company LLC; and EFH Corporate Services Company, and of no other
debtors.  The Committee has selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and
Polsinelli PC for representation in this high-profile energy
restructuring.  The lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck,
Esq., Brett H. Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at
Morrison & Foerster LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K.
Edelson, Esq., Shanti M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at
Polsinelli PC.

                           *     *     *

As reported in the TCR, the Debtors' Plan of Reorganization, as
amended, contemplates a tax-free spinoff of Texas Competitive
Electric Holdings Company LLC (TCEH), and an injection of
approximately $7 billion of equity capital and approximately $5
billion of debt to finance a tax-free merger of reorganized EFH
Corp., which new capital would fund the payoff of E-side claims.
In addition to enjoying broad support among T-side creditors, the
Plan contemplates the unimpairment of all allowed E-side claims.
In connection with consummation of the merger, Oncor would be
restructured to permit the surviving company to convert to a REIT.


Under the Plan, Energy Future's 80% stake in Oncor Electric
Delivery Company LLC is to be taken over by a consortium of
investors, including an affiliate of Hunt Consolidated Inc.,
Anchorage Capital Group, Arrowgrass Capital Partners, BlackRock,
Centerbridge Partners, the Blackstone Group's GSO Capital Partners
LP, Avenue Capital Group and the Teacher Retirement System of
Texas.




EXPORTHER BONDED: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Exporther Bonded Corp.
           dba EBC Duty Free
        2323 NW 72 Ave
        Miami, FL 33122-1827

Case No.: 15-28287

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 15, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida (Miami)

Judge: Hon. Robert A Mark

Debtor's Counsel: David R. Softness, Esq.
                  DAVID R. SOFTNESS, P.A.
                  201 S Biscayne Blvd #2740
                  Miami, FL 33131
                  Tel: 305.341.3111
                  Email: david@softnesslaw.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Jorge H. Rivero, president.

A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb15-28287.pdf


FIRST DATA: Registers 180.5 Million Shares for Employee Plans
-------------------------------------------------------------
First Data Corporation filed a Form S-8 registration statement with
the Securities and Exchange Commission to register an aggregate of
180,486,125 shares of common stock of the Company issuable under
the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Employees of First Data
Corporation and its Affiliates, First Data Corporation 2015 Omnibus
Incentive Plan and First Data Corporation 2015 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan.  A copy of the prospectus is available for free at
http://is.gd/XbsQS3

                          About First Data

Based in Atlanta, Georgia, First Data Corporation provides
commerce and payment solutions for financial institutions,
merchants, and other organizations worldwide.

First Data reported a net loss attributable to the Corporation of
$458 million on $11.2 billion of total revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014, compared with a net loss attributable to the
Corporation of $869 million on $10.8 billion of total revenues
during the prior year.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $34.13 billion in total
assets, $31.7 billion in total liabilities, $78 million in
redeemable noncontrolling interest, and $2.35 billion in total
equity.

                           *     *     *

The Company carries a 'B3' corporate family rating, with a
stable outlook, from Moody's Investors Service, a 'B' corporate
credit rating, with stable outlook, from Standard & Poor's, and
a 'B' long-term issuer default rating from Fitch Ratings.


FIRST EAGLE: S&P Assigns 'BB+' LT Issuer Credit Rating
------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said it assigned its 'BB+'
long-term issuer credit rating to First Eagle Investment
Management, LLC (FE).  Standard & Poor's also assigned its 'BB+'
issue-level rating to the company's proposed $1.35 billion term
loan B due in 2022 and $150 million revolving credit facility, due
in 2020.  Standard & Poor's assigned a recovery rating of '3' to
the proposed term loan B and the revolving credit facility,
indicating S&P's expectation of meaningful (50%-70%; in the higher
end of the range) of recovery in a default scenario.  The outlook
is stable.

"The ratings on FE reflect our view of the company's very long
successful investment and operating performance track record and
strong distribution capability," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst Daniel Koelsch.  Constraining the ratings are what we
believe is a significant concentration in FE's flagship product
Global Value (66.1% of total assets under management; AUM) and
concentration in equity products (approximately 75% of AUM).  In
addition, FE's expected new ownership structure by a financial
sponsor means that the financial risk profile and financial policy
assessments are limited at "aggressive."  However, debt leverage of
2.7x (including the impact of operating leases and excluding any
cash offset) is substantially below the 5x threshold the
"aggressive" financial risk profile and "FS-5" financial policy
assessments indicate.

FE is a New York-based, independent, closely held asset manager
that is currently family and employee owned with a majority stake
to be held by Blackstone Group LP and Corsair Capital (expected to
be about 56%-60%), the private equity investors.  The transaction
is expected to close in December 2015.

The company serves as the advisor to First Eagle Funds, first
registered in 1987, with the addition of the SocGen Funds in 1999.
Beyond the SocGen acquisition, growth has mostly been organic or
through acquisitions of teams.  The company focuses on
benchmark-agnostic, absolute return-oriented investing with
downside protection and had $98.8 billion in AUM as of June 30,
2015.

S&P's assessment of FE's business risk profile as "satisfactory"
reflects the company's long track record of adhering to a
well-defined and clear business model, strong long-term performance
in its flagship fund, and above-average profitability.

S&P considers FE's profitability "above average," with the EBITDA
margin at 53.1% as of June 30, 2015.  S&P expects it to stay in the
high 40s to low 50s over the forecast horizon.

Because of the expected financial sponsor ownership by Blackstone
and Corsair, the financial risk profile is capped at "FS-5"
(aggressive) under S&P's criteria.

"We consider FE's comparable rating analysis "favorable."  In our
opinion, compared with those of similarly rated companies, FE's
margin, financials, and coverage are and will remain solid and
substantially better than the leverage levels the "FS-5" financial
policy assessment implies under our criteria.  The stable outlook
reflects Standard & Poor's expectation that the company will be
able to maintain current profitability levels (as defined by its
EBITDA margin in the low 50% area) and will maintain liquidity
coverage at or above expected levels following the proposed
ownership change.  The outlook also implies modest growth in AUM
with accordingly consistent revenues," S&P said.

"If AUM declines significantly because of net asset outflows caused
by weak investment performance or market depreciation, causing
weaker profitability metrics, we could lower the ratings. We would
also lower the ratings if FE's liquidity coverage metrics were to
fall below current levels on a sustained basis," S&P added.

S&P believes that an upgrade is unlikely over the forecast horizon.
S&P could consider an upgrade if FE were to lessen its dependence
on equities in general and on its flagship product in particular,
thus improving its diversification and business risk profile.

S&P could also raise the rating if the company significantly
improves its portfolio diversification while maintaining the
portfolio's quality and liquidity.



FISKER AUTOMOTIVE: Execs Lose Second Bid to Escape Investors' Suit
------------------------------------------------------------------
Carmen Germaine at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that a Delaware
federal judge on Oct. 15, 2015, refused to allow two executives of
bankrupt Fisker Automotive to reargue her decision requiring them
to face investors' claims they hid the automaker's cash flow
problems, saying both were involved in alleged false statements.

U.S. District Judge Sue L. Robinson denied motions by Fisker board
member Richard Li Tzar Kai and Chief Operating Officer Bernhard
Koehler to revisit a motion to dismiss the complaint that she
partially denied in September.  

                     About Fisker Automotive

Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc., developer of the Karma plug-in
hybrid electric sedan, filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 13-13087) on Nov. 22, 2013.

Fisker estimated assets of more than $100 million and listed debt
of $500 million in its bankruptcy petition.  The assets include an
assembly plant purchased for $21 million from General Motors Corp.
The plant never operated.  The cars were assembled in Finland.

Fisker received a $529 million loan from the Department of
Energy's Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program
and drew down about $192 million before the department froze the
loan after Fisker failed to hit several development targets.  The
company defaulted on its loan in April 2013.

Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross presides over the case.  The Debtors
have tapped James H.M. Sprayregen, P.C., Esq., Anup Sathy, P.C.,
Esq., and Ryan Preston Dahl, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in
Chicago, Illinois, as co-counsel; Laura Davis Jones, Esq., James
E. O'Neill, Esq., and Peter J. Keane, Esq., at Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP, in Wilmington, Delaware, as co-counsel;
Beilinson Advisory Group as restructuring advisors; and Rust
Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy, as notice and claims agent and
administrative advisor.

On Nov. 5, 2013, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
was appointed. The members are: (a) David M. Cohen; (b) Sven
Etzelsberger; (c) Kuster Automotive Door Systems GmbH; (d) Magna
E-Car USA, LLC; (e) Supercars & More SRL; and (f) TK Holdings Inc.
The Committee is represented by William R. Baldiga, Esq., and
Sunni P. Beville, Esq., at Brown Rudnick LLP; and Mark Minuti,
Esq., at Saul Ewing LLP.  Emerald Capital Advisors Corp. is the
financial advisors for the Committee.

Fisker sought bankruptcy protection to pursue a private sale of
its business to Hybrid Tech Holdings, LLC.  The Committee,
however, wants a sale public sale, and has identified Wanxiang
America Corporation as stalking horse bidder.

Hybrid was initially under contract to buy Fisker in exchange for
$75 million of the $168.5 million government loan it acquired
immediately before the Debtor's Chapter 11 filing.  Hybrid later
raised its offer by adding an additional $1 million cash and
agreeing to share proceeds from the sale of a facility in Delaware
it doesn't intend to operate.  Hybrid also offered to pay real
estate taxes on the Delaware plant.  Hybrid also will waive $90
million in deficiency claims that otherwise would dilute unsecured
creditors' recovery.

Wanxiang, as stalking horse bidder, initially offered $25.8
million in cash.  However, Wanxiang has said it has raised its
offer by $10 million and is willing to go higher.

After the hearings on Jan. 10 and 13, the Court directed a public
auction, and capped Hybrid's credit bid to $25 million.

In response, Hybrid raised its offer to $55 million.

Hybrid is represented by Tobias Keller, Esq., and Peter
Benvenutti, Esq., at Keller & Benvenutti LLP, in San Francisco,
California.

Wanxiang, which bought A123 Systems, Inc., a manufacturer of
lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles such as the Fisker
Karma, in a bankruptcy auction early in 2013 for $256.6 million,
is represented in Fisker's case by Sidley Austin LLP's Bojan
Guzina, Esq., and Andrew F. O'Neill, Esq.; and Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP's Edmon L. Morton, Esq., Robert S. Brady,
Esq., and Kenneth J. Enos, Esq.

On Feb. 19, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of
Fisker's assets to Wanxiang America Corporation.  The sale closed
on March 24.  The sale to Wanxiang is valued at approximately $150
million, Fisker said in a news statement.

On March 27, 2014, the Court authorized Fisker Automotive Holdings
to change its name to FAH Liquidating Corp. and its affiliate,
Fisker Automotive Inc., to FA Liquidating Corp., following the
sale.

FA Liquidating Corp. (F/K/A Fisker Automotive, Inc.) and FAH
Liquidating Corp. (F/K/A Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc.)
notified the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
that their Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation became
effective as of Aug. 13, 2014.


FRESH & EASY: Reportedly Preparing for Bankruptcy
-------------------------------------------------
Bloomberg reports that Fresh & Easy is preparing for its second
bankruptcy filing in two years, and that an application could come
as soon as this week, unless a buyer for all or part of the chain
is found.

Nancy Luna at The Orange County Register reports that Brendan
Wonnacott, the Company's spokesperson, refuted Bloomberg's report,
saying, "Fresh & Easy has been in the process of restructuring
since transitioning to new ownership two years ago, most recently
closing a number of unprofitable stores.  The Company has not made
a decision relative to the use of court assistance in the
restructuring process."

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on April 1, 2015, The
Associated Press reported that the Company is closing about 50
stores in California, Arizona and Nevada as the grocery chain
pursues a new business model.  

                       About Fresh & Easy

Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market Inc., and its affiliate filed
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 13-12569 and
13-12570) on Sept. 30, 2013.  The petitions were signed by James
Dibbo, chief financial officer.  Judge Kevin J. Carey presides
over the case.

Fresh & Easy owes $738 million to Cheshunt, England-based Tesco,
the U.K.'s biggest retailer. Fresh & Easy never made a profit and
lost an average of $22 million a month in the 12 months ended in
February, according to court papers.

Jones Day serves as lead bankruptcy counsel.  Richards, Layton &
Finger, P.A., serves as local Delaware counsel.  Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC, serves as financial advisors, and Alvarez &
Marsal Securities, LLC, serves as investment banker.  Prime Clerk
LLC acts as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.  Gordon
Brothers Group, LLC, and Tiger Capital Group, LLC, serves as the
Debtors' consultant.  The Debtors estimated assets of at least $100
million and liabilities of at least $500 million.

Roberta A. DeAngelis, U.S. Trustee for Region 3, appointed five
creditors to serve in the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Fresh & Easy Neighborhood
Market Inc., et al.  Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP serves as
counsel to the Committee.  FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as its
financial advisor.

The Debtors closed, on or about Nov. 26, 2013, the sale of about
150 supermarkets plus a production facility in Riverside,
California, to Ron Buckle's Yucaipa Cos.  Pursuant to the sale
terms, the bankruptcy company changed its name, and the name of
the case, to Old FENM Inc.

Judge Kevin J. Carey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware on July 2, 2014, issued an order confirming Old FENM,
Inc., et al.'s second amended joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.


FRESH & EASY: Said to Prepare for Bankruptcy Filing
---------------------------------------------------
Carol Ko, Lauren Coleman-Lochner and Jodi Xu Klein, writing for
Bloomberg News, reported that Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market
Inc., the former Tesco Plc-owned grocery chain that billionaire Ron
Burkle bought in 2013, is preparing its second bankruptcy filing in
two years, according to people familiar with the situation.

According to the report, citing the people, the supermarket company
could still find a buyer for all or part of the chain, a move that
may forestall a filing.

                       About Fresh & Easy

Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market Inc., and its affiliate filed
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 13-12569 and
13-12570) on Sept. 30, 2013.  The petitions were signed by James
Dibbo, chief financial officer.  Judge Kevin J. Carey presides
over the case.

Fresh & Easy owes $738 million to Cheshunt, England-based Tesco,
the U.K.'s biggest retailer. Fresh & Easy never made a profit and
lost an average of $22 million a month in the 12 months ended in
February, according to court papers.

Jones Day serves as lead bankruptcy counsel.  Richards, Layton &
Finger, P.A., serves as local Delaware counsel.  Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC, serves as financial advisors, and Alvarez &
Marsal Securities, LLC, serves as investment banker.  Prime Clerk
LLC acts as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.  Gordon
Brothers Group, LLC, and Tiger Capital Group, LLC, serves as the
Debtors' consultant. The Debtors estimated assets of at least $100
million and liabilities of at least $500 million.

Roberta A. DeAngelis, U.S. Trustee for Region 3, appointed five
creditors to serve in the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Fresh & Easy Neighborhood
Market Inc., et al.  Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP serves as
counsel to the Committee. FTI Consulting, Inc. serves as its
financial advisor.

The Debtors closed, on or about Nov. 26, 2013, the sale of about
150 supermarkets plus a production facility in Riverside,
California, to Ron Buckle's Yucaipa Cos.  Pursuant to the sale
terms, the bankruptcy company changed its name, and the name of
the case, to Old FENM Inc.

Judge Kevin J. Carey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware on July 2, 2014, issued an order confirming Old FENM,
Inc., et al.'s second amended joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.


GENERAL MOTORS: Victims' Atty Says Punitives Have 'Biblical' Goal
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sindhu Sundar at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that an attorney for
victims injured in ignition-switch accidents argued On Oct. 14,
2015, that General Motors Co.'s Chapter 11 reorganization in 2009
didn't prevent his clients from seeking punitive damages, saying
such recourse serves the "biblical" purpose of retribution.

In oral arguments before U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Gerber,
William Weintraub of Goodwin Procter LLP, who represents those
injured in ignition switch accidents that took place after GM's
bankruptcy, argued that punitive damages serve a crucial purpose
even though the prebankruptcy company has liquidated.

                     About Motors Liquidation

General Motors Corporation and three of its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 09-50026) on
June 1, 2009.  The Honorable Robert E. Gerber presides over the
Chapter 11 cases.  Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Stephen Karotkin, Esq.,
and Joseph H. Smolinsky, Esq., at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP,
assist the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Al Koch at AP
Services, LLC, an affiliate of AlixPartners, LLP, serves as the
Chief Executive Officer for Motors Liquidation Company.  GM
is also represented by Jenner & Block LLP and Honigman Miller
Schwartz and Cohn LLP as counsel.  Cravath, Swaine, & Moore LLP is
providing legal advice to the GM Board of Directors.  GM's
financial advisors are Morgan Stanley, Evercore Partners and the
Blackstone Group LLP.  Garden City Group is the claims and notice
agent of the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors and a separate Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Holding Asbestos-Related Claims.  Lawyers at Kramer Levin Naftalis
& Frankel LLP served as bankruptcy counsel to the Creditors
Committee.  Attorneys at Butzel Long served as counsel
on supplier contract matters.  FTI Consulting Inc. served as
financial advisors to the Creditors Committee.  Elihu Inselbuch,
Esq., at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, represented the Asbestos
Committee.  Legal Analysis Systems, Inc., served as asbestos
valuation analyst.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Debtors'
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan on March 29, 2011.  The Plan
was declared effect on March 31.

On Dec. 15, 2011, Motors Liquidation Company was dissolved.  On
the Dissolution Date, pursuant to the Plan and the Motors
Liquidation Company GUC Trust Agreement, dated March 30, 2011,
between the parties thereto, the trust administrator and trustee --
GUC Trust Administrator -- of the Motors Liquidation Company GUC
Trust, assumed responsibility for the affairs of and certain claims
against MLC and its debtor subsidiaries that were not concluded
prior to the Dissolution Date.

As of March 31, 2015, Motors Liquidation had $1.01 billion in
total assets, $69.2 million in total liabilities and $945 million
in net assets in liquidation.


GLOBAL MARITIME: U.S. Trustee Forms Three-Member Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed three creditors of GMI USA
Management Inc. and its affiliated debtors to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors.

The unsecured creditors are:

     (1) Southport Agencies
         2700 Lake Villa Dr. Ste 180
         Metairie, LA 70002
         Tel. (504) 450-5012
         Attn.: Mr. Kevin Lagraize
         E-mail: klagraize@southport-nola.com

     (2) Mardinik Shipping Co. Ltd.
         c/o Sealestial Navigation Co.
         3, Xanthou Str., Glyfada
         16673 Athens, Greece
         Tel. +30 210 9681430
         Attn.: Georgios N. Karamolegkos
         E-mail: info@sealestial.gr

     (3) ADM Investor Services International Limited
         4th Floor Millennium Bridge House
         2 Lambeth Hill, London EC4V 3TT
         Tel. +44 207 716 8001
         Attn.: Mr. Philip Wasling
         E-mail: philip.wasling@admisi.com

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense.  They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs.  Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

                     About GMI USA Management

GMI USA Management, Inc., Global Maritime Investments Cyprus
Limited, Global Maritime Investments Holdings Cyprus Limited,
Global Maritime Investments Resources (Singapore) Pte. Limited and
Global Maritime Investments Vessel Holdings Pte Ltd filed Chapter
11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 15-12552 to
15-12556) on Sept. 15, 2015.

The Debtors are engaged in three segments of the dry bulk shipping
markets, utilizing Freight Forward Agreements, physical "trading"
or supplying of ships for hire, and management of a dry bulk
shipping pool on behalf of ships owned directly or indirectly by
the Debtors, as well as for third party owners.

Debtor GMI USA Management is a recently formed New York
corporation.  All of the other Debtors are foreign corporations
based in either Singapore or Cyrus.

Global Maritime Investments Holdings Cyprus Limited is a holding
company that owns 100% of the outstanding shares of each of (i)
Debtor GMI USA Management, Inc., (ii) Debtor Cyprus Tradeco, (iii)
Debtor Vessel Holdings and (iv) non-Debtor GMI Panamax Pool
Limited.

The Debtors estimated assets in the range of $1 million to $10
million and liabilities of at least $100 million.

The Debtors tapped Gardere Wynne Sewell, LLP, as counsel, and AMA
Capital Parnters as financial advisor.


GLYECO INC: Names Maria Tellez Interim Chief Financial Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of GlyEco, Inc., appointed Maria Tellez to
be the interim chief financial officer of the Company, effective
Oct. 13, 2015.

Ms. Tellez, 41, currently also serves as the vice president of
finance.  Prior to being named as vice president of finance, Ms.
Tellez served as the Company's controller since February 2014.  Ms.
Tellez has over 15 combined years of accounting, audit, and
controllership experience.  Since 2008 until joining the Company,
Ms. Tellez served as the assistance controller of Empereon
Marketing / Constar Financial Services, where she assisted in the
documentation, development, implementation, and management of the
company's internal control processes and procedures.  From 2004 to
2008, she performed audit and review procedures as an Auditor with
Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP.  From 1999 to 2004, she was a senior
accountant with Bechtel Corporation, where she managed a staff of
accountants in the billing, compliance, contracts, and general
ledger departments.  Ms. Tellez earned a Bachelor of Science (B.S.)
degree in Accounting/Finance from the University of Arizona in
1998.

                         About GlyEco, Inc.

Phoenix, Ariz.-based GlyEco, Inc., is a green chemistry company
formed to roll-out its proprietary and patent pending glycol
recycling technology that transforms waste glycols, a hazardous
material, into profitable green products.

Glyeco reported a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$8.73 million on $5.89 million of net sales for the year ended Dec.
31, 2014, compared with a net loss of $4 million on $5.53 million
of net sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2013.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $15.90 million in total
assets, $2.59 million in total liabilities and $13.31 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP, in Phoenix, Arizona, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has yet to
achieve profitable operations and is dependent on its ability to
raise capital from stockholders or other sources to sustain
operations and to ultimately achieve viable operations. These
factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


GREAT ATLANTIC: 3500 Aramingo Alleges ROFO Violation
----------------------------------------------------
3500 Aramingo Avenue, LLC, objects to The Great Atlantic & Pacific
Tea Company, Inc., et al.'s notice of auction, telling the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York that it had
entered into an "Agreement of Sale" with Debtor Pathmark Stores,
Inc., whereby 3500 Aramingo purchased real property and
improvements, together with Debtor Pathmark's additional rights and
interests, located at 3500 Aramingo Avenue, in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.

3500 Aramingo further relates that among the assets, rights, title
and interests sold by Debtor Pathmark to 3500 Aramingo pursuant to
the Sale Agreement is the right of first offer with respect to the
3399 Aramingo Lease, which, from the perspective of 3500 Aramingo
Avenue, was a bargained for component of the sale and purchase
transaction for which 3500 Aramingo paid adequate consideration.

3500 Aramingo tells the Court that the Debtors failed to give it
notice of the filing of the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases or the
motions filed and ultimately granted by the Court that pertain to
the sale and assumption and assignment of the leases of the
Debtors, which motions directly affect its rights and interests.
3500 Aramingo further tells the Court that it was not given notice
and an opportunity to object to the Debtors proposed sale free and
clear of interests and was therefore deprived of its due process
rights with respect to the same.

3500 Aramingo contends that the sale of the Proposed Wakefern Lease
Package should not be permitted to proceed subject to the proposed
bidding procedures and bid protections, at least insofar as the
same pertain to the proposed sale of the 3399 Aramingo Lease. 3500
Aramingo asserts that this is true both because the structure of
the proposed procedures and protections will only serve to "chill"
bidding and because the Debtors have knowingly and willfully
violated 3500 Aramingo’s rights under the ROFO by failing to
abide by the express terms and conditions thereof prior to entering
into a stalking horse sale agreement with Wakefern for, among
others, the 3399 Aramingo Lease.

                  Debtors' Reply

The Debtors tell the Court that Aramingo's Objection should be
overruled because (1) the alleged right of first offer was
extinguished in the 2010 Chapter 11 Cases as a result of its
rejection as an executory contract, and also because of the plan
discharge, (2) the Debtors' assumed and assigned the 3399 Aramingo
Lease free and clear of all claims and encumbrances in the 2010
Chapter 11 Cases, (3) the ROFO provision is an anti-assignment
clause that is unenforceable under section 365(f) of the Bankruptcy
Code, and (4) the Bid Protections are a reasonable exercise of the
Debtors' business judgment within the authority granted by the
Court and consistent with the Debtors’ duties to maximize the
value of their estates.

The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. and its affiliated
Debtors are represented by:

          Ray C. Schrock, Esq.
          Garret A. Fail Esq.
          WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
          767 Fifth Avenue
          New York, NY 10153
          Telephone: (212)310-8000
          Facsimile: (212)310-8007
          Email: ray.schrock@weil.com
                 garrett.fail@weil.com

3500 Aramingo Avenue, LLC is represented by:

          Paul S. Hollander, Esq.
          Gregory S. Kinoian, Esq.
          Margreta M. Morgulas, Esq.
          OKIN HOLLANDER LLC
          Glenpointe Centre West
          500 Frank W. Burr Boulevard, Suite 40
          Teaneck, New Jersey 07666
          Telephone: (201)947-7500
          Facsimile: (201)947-2663

                    About Atlantic & Pacific

Based in Montvale, New Jersey, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
Company, Inc., and its affiliates are one of the nation's oldest
leading supermarket and food retailers, operating approximately
300
supermarkets, beer, wine, and liquor stores, combination food and
drug stores, and limited assortment food stores across six
Northeastern states.  The primary retail operations consist of
supermarkets operated under a variety of well known trade names,
or
"banners," including A&P, Waldbaum's, SuperFresh, Pathmark, Food
Basics, The Food Emporium, Best Cellars, and A&P Liquors.  The
Company employs approximately 28,500 employees, over 90% of whom
are members of one of twelve local unions whose members are
employed by the Debtors under the authority of 35 separate
collective bargaining agreements.

Then with 429 stores, A&P and its affiliates filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 10-24549) on Dec. 12, 2010,
and in 2012 emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a privately held
company with 320 supermarkets.

On July, 19, 2015, with 300 stores, A&P and 20 affiliated debtors
each filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) after reaching
deals for the going concern sales of 120 stores.  The Debtors are
seeking joint administration under Case No. 15-23007.

The Debtor disclosed total assets of $601,441,108 and total
liabilities of $1,984,459,086 as of the Petition Date.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as counsel, Evercore
Group L.L.C., as investment banker, FTI Consulting, Inc., as
financial advisor, Hilco Real Estate, LLC, as real estate advisor,
and Prime Clerk LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed seven creditors to serve
On the official committee of unsecured creditors.  Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP serves as its counsel, and Zolfo Cooper, LLC as
serves as its financial advisors and bankruptcy consultants.

Elise S. Frejka was appointed as consumer privacy ombudsman.


GREAT ATLANTIC: Seeks $11.75-Mil. Lease Sale to Food Bazaar
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., and its affiliated
debtors ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York, to approve the lease sale agreements between Debtor A&P
Real Property, LLC, and Bogopa Service Corp. d/b/a Food Bazaar.

Pursuant to the terms of the Food Bazaar Agreements, the Seller
agreed to sell, transfer and assign to Food Bazaar all of its
rights, title and interest in and to the Leases, the Subleases and
the Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment, with respect to the
following stores:

   (1) Store 72634, located at 111-1- Flatlands Avenue, Brooklyn,
NY;
   (2) Store 72288, located at 211 Elmora Avenue, Elizabeth, NJ;
   (3) Store 70618, located at 425 Anderson Avenue, Fairview, NJ;
and
   (4) Store 59512, located at 1425 Kennedy Blvd., North Bergen,
NJ.

The Debtors contend that Food Bazaar has agreed to pay to the
Sellers a purchase price in the amount of (i) $3,550,000 for Store
No. 72634, (ii) $3,000,000 for Store No. 72288, (iii) $2,275,000
for Store No. 70618, and (iv) $2,925,000 for Store No. 59512, for
an aggregate purchase price of $11,750,000.

The Debtors further contend that for those store employees
represented by a labor union, Food Bazaar has agreed to negotiate
with the appropriate local union representing such employees in
good faith, to (a) assume the applicable collective bargaining
agreement; (b) reach a mutually acceptable collective bargaining
agreement; or (c) enter into an agreement with such local union
integrating such covered employees into Food Bazaar’s existing
collective bargaining units.

The Debtors tell the Court that the Food Bazaar Agreements secure
significant value for the Debtors’ estates. The Debtors further
tell the Court that they have extensively marketed the Food Bazaar
Stores during the pre- and postpetition marketing process, and
believe that the value offered by Food Bazaar for each of these
stores is favorable to the Debtors and their estates. The Debtors
relate that the Food Bazaar Agreements are stalking horse
agreements that remain subject to higher or better offers and an
auction, which was scheduled for October 8, 2015. The Debtors
further relate that by the end of the marketing and solicitation
period contemplated by the Bidding Procedures, if no higher or
better bid is received, the Debtors will have achieved the highest
and best offers for the Food Bazaar Stores.

The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. and its affiliated
Debtors are represented by:

          Ray C. Schrock, Esq.
          Garret A. Fail Esq.
          WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
          767 Fifth Avenue
          New York, NY 10153
          Telephone: (212)310-8000
          Facsimile: (212)310-8007
          Email: ray.schrock@weil.com
                 garrett.fail@weil.com

                About Atlantic & Pacific

Based in Montvale, New Jersey, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
Company, Inc., and its affiliates are one of the nation's oldest
leading supermarket and food retailers, operating approximately
300
supermarkets, beer, wine, and liquor stores, combination food and
drug stores, and limited assortment food stores across six
Northeastern states.  The primary retail operations consist of
supermarkets operated under a variety of well known trade names,
or
"banners," including A&P, Waldbaum's, SuperFresh, Pathmark, Food
Basics, The Food Emporium, Best Cellars, and A&P Liquors.  The
Company employs approximately 28,500 employees, over 90% of whom
are members of one of twelve local unions whose members are
employed by the Debtors under the authority of 35 separate
collective bargaining agreements.

Then with 429 stores, A&P and its affiliates filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 10-24549) on Dec. 12, 2010,
and in 2012 emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a privately held
company with 320 supermarkets.

On July, 19, 2015, with 300 stores, A&P and 20 affiliated debtors
each filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) after reaching
deals for the going concern sales of 120 stores.  The Debtors are
seeking joint administration under Case No. 15-23007.

The Debtor disclosed total assets of $601,441,108 and total
liabilities of $1,984,459,086 as of the Petition Date.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as counsel, Evercore
Group L.L.C., as investment banker, FTI Consulting, Inc., as
financial advisor, Hilco Real Estate, LLC, as real estate advisor,
and Prime Clerk LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed seven creditors to serve
On the official committee of unsecured creditors.  Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP serves as its counsel, and Zolfo Cooper, LLC as
serves as its financial advisors and bankruptcy consultants.

Elise S. Frejka was appointed as consumer privacy ombudsman.


GREAT ATLANTIC: Seeks Approval of Wakefern Lease Sale Agreement
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., and its affiliated
debtors ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York to approve the lease sale agreement between Sellers A&P
Live Better, LLC, and A&P Real Property, LLC and Wakefern Food
Corp.

Pursuant to the Wakefern Agreement, the Debtors propose to sell,
transfer and assign to Wakefern, which at Closing will
simultaneously sublease to an applicable Designated Member, all of
their rights, title and interest in and to the Leases, the
Subleases and FF&E with respect to the following stores:

   (1) Store 70074, located at 1 Padanaram Road, Danbury, CT;
   (2) Store 72653, located at 3901 Hempstead Turnpike, Bethpage,
NY;
   (3) Store 72649, located at 2335 New Hyde Park Road, New Hyde
Park, NY;
   (4) Store 70699, located at 1960 Deer Park Avenue, Deer Park,
NY;
   (5) Store 72558, located at 5005 Edgemont Avenue, Brookhaven,
PA;
   (6) Store 72569, located at 140 North MacDade Boulevard,
Glenolden, PA;
   (7) Store 72552, located at 330 Oregon Avenue, Philadelphia,
PA;
   (8) Store 72522, located at 3399 Aramingo Avenue, Philadelphia,
PA;
   (9) Store 70003, located at 1643 Route 82, Lagrangeville, NY;
  (10) Store 72528, located at 1000 Easton Road, Wyncote, PA;
  (11) Store 72556, located at 4160 Monument Avenue, Philadelphia,
PA; and
  (12) Store 72568, located at 421 S. 69th Street, Upper Darby,
PA.

The Debtors relate that Wakefern has agreed to pay the Sellers a
purchase price in the amount of $40,000,000, which is comprised of
$29,835,260 as consideration for the Leases and $10,164,740 as
consideration for the Furniture Fixtures & Equipment.  The Debtors
further relate that Wakefern has agreed to use commercially
reasonable efforts to interview full-time employees of the Stores
included in the Wakefern Package who are represented by a labor
union and apply for employment at such Stores after the closing of
the transactions contemplated by the Wakefern Agreement.
    
The Debtors tell the Court that the Wakefern Agreement secures
significant value for the Debtors' estates for these assets.  They
further tell the Court that they have extensively marketed the
stores included in the Wakefern Package during the pre- and
postpetition marketing process, and believe that the value offered
by Wakefern is favorable to the Debtors and their estates.

The Debtors relate that the Wakefern Agreement is a stalking horse
agreement that remains subject to higher or better offers and an
auction, which was scheduled for October 8, 2015. The Debtors
contend that by the end of the marketing and solicitation period
contemplated by the Bidding Procedures, if no higher or better bid
is received, the Debtors will have achieved the highest and best
offer for the stores included in the Wakefern Package.

               Gator Monument's Objection

Gator Monument Partners LLLP is successor to the original landlord
under Debtors' lease agreement for store number 72556 located at
4160 Monument Road, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Gator contends that, as part of their "cure obligation," the
Debtors are obligated to deliver to Gator the consideration paid
for the assignment of the Lease. Gator further contends that in
this instance, pursuant to the Wakefern Sale Motion, it appears
that the portion of the $40 million in consideration to be paid by
Wakefern allocable to the Lease is $4,258,490. Gator asserts that
provision must be made for this payment as a condition to
assumption and assignment of the Lease.

Gator tells the Court that the Basic Rent under the Lease, which
increased every five years under the Primary Term of the Lease (the
first 25 years of the Lease), was $60,375.66 per month ($724,507.92
per year) during the last five-year period of the Primary Term
which ran through November 30, 2005. Gator further tells the Court
that during the Extended Term, commencing December 1, 2005, in
consideration for the grant to Gator's predecessor of the right to
receive proceeds of a lease assignment, the Basic Rent payable is
dramatically reduced by approximately 45% to $33,671.77
($404,061.24 per year). Gator contends that throughout the Extended
Term -- potentially for 30 years through November 30, 2035 -- the
Debtors have received and are to continue to receive a rent
discount of approximately 45% (approximately $9,600,000 over the
course of 30 years) in exchange for Landlord being entitled to
receive the proceeds of any assignment of the Lease.

Gator asserts that the sum of at least $4,871,098 (plus
Landlord’s attorney’s fees and costs) is the correct cure
amount that must be paid by or on account of the Debtors in order
to cure all defaults under the to-be assigned Lease as a condition
to the assumption and assignment of the same as contemplated under
the Procedures Motion.

The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. and its affiliated
Debtors are represented by:

          Ray C. Schrock, Esq.
          Garret A. Fail Esq.
          WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
          767 Fifth Avenue
          New York, NY 10153
          Telephone: (212)310-8000
          Facsimile: (212)310-8007
          Email: ray.schrock@weil.com
                 garrett.fail@weil.com

Gator Monument Partners LLLP is represented by:

          Andrew B. Eckstein, Esq.
          BLANK ROME LLP
          The Chrysler Building
          405 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10174
          Telephone: (212)885-5000
          Facsimile: (212)885-5001
          Email: aeckstein@blankrome.com

                  About Atlantic & Pacific

Based in Montvale, New Jersey, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
Company, Inc., and its affiliates are one of the nation's oldest
leading supermarket and food retailers, operating approximately
300
supermarkets, beer, wine, and liquor stores, combination food and
drug stores, and limited assortment food stores across six
Northeastern states.  The primary retail operations consist of
supermarkets operated under a variety of well known trade names,
or
"banners," including A&P, Waldbaum's, SuperFresh, Pathmark, Food
Basics, The Food Emporium, Best Cellars, and A&P Liquors.  The
Company employs approximately 28,500 employees, over 90% of whom
are members of one of twelve local unions whose members are
employed by the Debtors under the authority of 35 separate
collective bargaining agreements.

Then with 429 stores, A&P and its affiliates filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 10-24549) on Dec. 12, 2010,
and in 2012 emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a privately held
company with 320 supermarkets.

On July, 19, 2015, with 300 stores, A&P and 20 affiliated debtors
each filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) after reaching
deals for the going concern sales of 120 stores.  The Debtors are
seeking joint administration under Case No. 15-23007.

The Debtor disclosed total assets of $601,441,108 and total
liabilities of $1,984,459,086 as of the Petition Date.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as counsel, Evercore
Group L.L.C., as investment banker, FTI Consulting, Inc., as
financial advisor, Hilco Real Estate, LLC, as real estate advisor,
and Prime Clerk LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed seven creditors to serve
On the official committee of unsecured creditors.  Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP serves as its counsel, and Zolfo Cooper, LLC as
serves as its financial advisors and bankruptcy consultants.

Elise S. Frejka was appointed as consumer privacy ombudsman.


GREYSTONE LOGISTICS: Delays Aug. 31 Form 10-Q Over Limited Staff
----------------------------------------------------------------
Greystone Logistics, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission a Notification of Late Filing on Form 12b-25
with respect to its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended Aug. 31, 2015.  The Company said its limited personnel and
resources have impaired its ability to prepare and timely file its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

The Company's net income for the three-month period ended Aug. 31,
2015, is expected to be approximately $48,396 compared to $352,673
for the three-month period ended Aug. 31, 2014.

The Company's net loss available to common shareholders for the
three-month period ended Aug. 31, 2015, is expected to be
approximately $(91,315), or $(0.00) per share, compared $214,498,
or $0.01 per share, for the three-month period ended Aug. 31,
2014.

The decline in net income for the three-month period ended
Aug. 31, 2015, compared to the corresponding period in the prior
year is primarily due to (1) an approximately $496,000 decrease in
revenues and (2) a 5% increase in cost of sales to sales for the
three-month period ended Aug. 31, 2015, compared to the
corresponding period in the prior year.

                        About Greystone Logistics

Tulsa, Okla.-based Greystone Logistics, Inc. (OTC BB: GLGI.OB -
News) -- http://www.greystonelogistics.com/-- manufactures and
sells plastic pallets through its wholly owned subsidiary,
Greystone Manufacturing, LLC.  Greystone sells its pallets through
direct sales and a network of independent contractor distributors.
Greystone also sells its pallets and pallet leasing services to
certain large customers direct through its President, Senior Vice
President of Sales and Marketing and other employees.

As of May 31, 2015, the Company had $14.4 million in total assets,
$15.5 million in total liabilities and a total deficit of $1.1
million.


GUADALUPE REGIONAL: Fitch Assigns 'BB' Rating on $119.5MM Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'BB' rating to the following bonds
issued by the Board of Managers, Joint Guadalupe County - City of
Seguin, TX Hospital, d/b/a Guadalupe Regional Medical Center
(GRMC):

   -- $119.5 million hospital mortgage revenue, refunding and
      improvement bonds, series 2015.

Bond proceeds will refund about $89 million of existing debt,
finance $19 million of capital projects, provide funds for a debt
service reserve account, and pay issuance costs.  New money capital
projects include a new surgical floor, cardiac service expansion,
additional maternal services, and a new neonatal intensive care
unit.  The bonds are scheduled to sell via negotiated sale during
the week of Nov. 2, 2015.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by a mortgage on hospital property, pledge of
gross revenues and a debt service reserve fund.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

HEAVY DEBT POSITION: Pro forma debt of nearly $120 million amounts
to a very high 71% of capitalization and 7.7 times (x) EBITDA.
These levels compare unfavorably to Fitch's below investment-grade
medians of 58.5% and 5.1x, respectively.  Furthermore, pro forma
maximum annual debt service (MADS) as a percent of revenue is very
high at 8% verses Fitch's below investment grade median of 4.4%.

MODEST OPERATING PROFILE: GRMC's relatively small operating profile
with approximately $103 million of revenues and an average daily
inpatient census of about 41 leaves the organization susceptible to
reimbursement modifications and changes in the delivery of health
care.  Additionally, GRMC's high exposure to self-payors (about 10%
of gross revenues) and governmental payors (over 60% of gross
revenues) limits operational and financial flexibility.

ADEQUATE MARKET POSITION IN A GROWING SERVICE AREA: GRMC benefits
from its location in a rapidly growing region about 35 miles east
of San Antonio, Texas.  Both population and employment growth
trends are very favorable, and GRMC secures an adequate 55%
inpatient market-share in its primary service area in the city of
Seguin, Texas.  Regardless, outmigration levels to San Antonio
providers are somewhat high, and secondary service area competition
is evident from two hospitals in New Braunfels located about 16
miles away.

RELIANCE ON SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING: Given its reliance on the uneven
flow of supplemental Medicaid funding, GRMC's operating
profitability has been volatile over the past five years.
Nonetheless, average earnings and cash flow performance has been
solid.  The operating and operating EBITDA margins averaged a very
good 2.8% and 15%, respectively from fiscal years 2011-2015.  These
levels compare very favorably to Fitch's below investment grade
medians of 0.3% and 8.1%, respectively for fiscal year 2014.

LIGHT BUT GROWING LIQUIDITY METRICS: Even after the release of
nearly $7 million from a Federal Housing Administration (FHA)
mortgage reserve fund, liquidity metrics are light.  Pro forma
unrestricted cash and investments of $32 million amount to 26.8% of
pro forma debt, 132 days operating expenses or 4.1x cushion ratio
at Aug. 31, 2015.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

SUSTAINED CASH FLOW: Fitch expects Guadalupe Regional Medical
Center to make the necessary adjustments to maintain its financial
performance at levels similar to the past few years.  However, a
material reduction in supplemental funding due to changes in the
Texas Medicaid Waiver program in fiscal 2017 resulting in weaker
profitability and debt service coverage would lead to negative
rating action.

IMPROVED LIQUIDITY POSITION: Reduced capital spending combined with
healthy cash flow is expected to steadily build liquidity balances.
Actual performance that strengthens liquidity beyond projected
levels could allow for upward movement in the rating.

CREDIT PROFILE

GRMC is a joint municipal and county hospital licensed for 125 beds
and located approximately 35 miles east of San Antonio, Texas.  It
is the only city/county healthcare entity in the state of Texas.
GRMC's sponsors are Guadalupe County and the city of Seguin, both
of which provide funds to support charity care that amounted to
about $2.8 million in fiscal 2015.  The medical center began
operations in 1961 and the original hospital facility was built in
1965 and dramatically renovated and expanded in 2010. GRMC's
medical group has recently grown and now includes 17 employed
physicians in a variety of specialties.

PLAN OF FINANCE AND CAPITAL SPENDING

GRMC issued $99 million of FHA insured bonds in 2007 to expand and
renovate most of its hospital facilities.  Proceeds from the series
2015 bonds will refund all of GRMC's FHA debt and provide $19
million of new money to fund various capital projects including
replacement of the existing inpatient surgical suites, relocating
and enlarging the inpatient dialysis unit, addition of a second
cardiac catheterization laboratory, new space for pre-operative and
post-operative surgical recovery, moving and expanding obstetrical
services, and the creation of a new level II neonatal intensive
care unit.

These capital projects and service expansions are a result of a
strategic planning process that has allowed for the recruitment of
ten new physicians which led to volume gains in 2015.  For example,
inpatient admissions and births increased by about 8% and 9%,
respectively during fiscal 2015.  The facility improvements and
service additions are in response to a rapidly growing market area
population and competitive pressures emerging from a new hospital
facility that opened last year in New Braunfels (located 16 miles
away).  While Fitch views these capital plans favorably given the
business growth opportunities, GRMC's very heavy debt burden is a
limiting rating factor.

DEBT PROFILE

After the refunding, GRMC will have about $120 million of fixed
rate debt outstanding, all from the series 2015 bonds.  As a
result, pro forma debt levels are very high and amount to 71% of
capitalization, 7.7x EBITDA and 116% of total revenues.
Additionally, pro forma MADS as a percent of revenue is a very high
8%.  Nonetheless, the refinancing of the FHA insured bonds is
beneficial to GRMC as it generates significant cash flow savings by
lengthening the debt amortization, and permits the release of
nearly $7 million of mortgage reserve funds to boost unrestricted
cash balances.  The debt restructuring also allows for a modest
increase in proposed MADS of about $640,000, despite the $19
million new money borrowing and high cost of the securities for the
refunding escrow account.

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

GRMC's reliance on the uneven flow of supplemental Medicaid funding
leads to volatile operating profitability.  During fiscal 2012,
under the state of Texas' Medicaid waiver program, the previous
payment methodology for treating unfunded and indigent patients was
modified.  While GRMC has benefited from the new funding programs,
payments have been delayed and variable.  For instance, GRMC
received $1.9 million of supplemental payments in fiscal 2012 and
$13.2 million in fiscal 2013.  As a result, earnings and debt
service coverage have been inconsistent. Nonetheless, average
earnings and cash flow performance has been solid.  The operating
and operating EBITDA margins averaged a very good 2.8% and 15%,
respectively from fiscal years 2011-2015.  After fiscal 2013,
supplemental payments leveled out a bit and GRMC produced solid
MADS coverage of 2.4x in fiscal 2014 and a 2.0x for the unaudited
11 month period ending Aug. 31, 2015. Current year performance
softened due to planned start-up expenses relating to GRMC's
employed medical group expansion.

DISCLOSURE

GRMC covenants to provide bondholders with quarterly financial
information and operating statistics within 60 days of quarter-end
and annual financial statements and operating statistics within 150
days of fiscal year-end.



HAGGEN HOLDINGS: Wants Trade Deal Settling $15M Claim Approved
--------------------------------------------------------------
Kali Hays at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that grocery chain Haggen
Holdings on On Oct. 14, 2015, asked a Delaware bankruptcy court to
approve a trade deal settling a $14.8 million claim of one of its
largest creditors, Unified Grocers, by agreeing to purchase all
perishables and other goods for its core Pacific Northwest grocery
locations from the creditor.

Haggen Holdings LLC has struggled since it bought 146 supermarkets
from Albertsons LLC last year, allowing the larger grocer to
proceed with its $9.2 billion takeover of Safeway, but says it has
been forced to close additional stores.

                            About Haggen

Haggen Holdings, LLC, and its affiliates filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del., Case Nos. 15-11874 to
15-11879) on Sept. 8, 2015.  The petitions were signed by Blake
Barnett as chief financial officer.

Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, is serving as the Debtors'
local counsel.  Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP serves as the
Debtors' general counsel.  Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC,
acts as the Debtors' financial advisor.  Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC serves as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

The Debtors have estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million
and estimated liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.


HEI INC: Plan of Liquidation Declared Effective
-----------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData reported that HEI Inc.'s Plan of Liquidation became
effective.  

The Court confirmed the Plan on Sept. 23, 2015.  According to
documents filed with the Court, "The Plan creates a Liquidating
Fund and assigns a Liquidating Agent to undertake the continuing
post-confirmation sale of all of the Debtor's remaining assets
(including the Victoria Property), the resolution of claims, the
pursuit of any Avoidance Claims and Causes of Action, the
distribution of proceeds to the holders of Allowed claims, and such
other actions as are necessary to wind down the Debtor's business.


Allowed claims will be paid from cash on hand the proceeds of
sales, and any net recoveries from Avoidance Claims and other
Causes of Action. The Debtor proposes the Plan to facilitate the
most efficient and timely liquidation of remaining assets as well
as the fastest distribution of proceeds to creditors. The Debtor
believes that the proposed Liquidating Agent has the familiarity
with the Debtor's assets and the liquidation expertise needed to
realize the maximum value for the remaining assets in a reasonable
period of time. Furthermore, the Plan provides a mechanism for
interim distributions to holders of Allowed claims that will allow
them to receive distributions as soon as practicable."  The
electronic manufacturing service provider filed for Chapter 11
protection on Jan. 4, 2015, listing $15 million in prepetition
assets.

                          About HEI Inc.

HEI, Inc., an electronic manufacturing service provider, filed a
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 15-40009)
in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Jan. 4, 2015, listing $15 million in
assets.  It is represented by James L. Baillie, Esq., James C.
Brand, Esq. and Sarah M. Olson, Esq. at Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.
in Minneapolis, MN; Alliance Management as business and financial
consultant; and Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., as special counsel.
The case is assigned to Judge Kathleen H. Sanberg.

On Jan. 9, 2015, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed
an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors comprised of: (a)
Teamvantage Molding LLC; (b) Watson-Marlow, Inc.; and (c) the
Vergent Products.  The United States Trustee has designated Cathy
Longtin of Teamvantage Molding LLC as acting chairperson, and the
Committee selected Ms. Longtin as permanent chairperson.


HOVENSA LLC: Gets Final Approval to Tap $40 Million Financing
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Randles at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that a federal judge
has signed off on a $40 million bankruptcy financing package for
St. Croix oil refinery Hovensa LLC, which filed for Chapter 11 last
month after it was sued by the Virgin Islands' government for
closing the facility.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary F. Walrath gave Hovensa final approval
to the refinery's debtor-in-possession financing, which will fund
the company as it restructures.  Hovensa filed for Chapter 11 in
September after the Virgin Islands reportedly launched a $1.5
billion lawsuit against Hess Corp.

                            About Hovensa

Hovensa, L.L.C., produces and markets refined petroleum products.
The Company offers gasoline, diesel, home heating oil, jet fuel,
kerosene, and residual fuel oil.  Hovensa serves customers
throughout North America.

Hovensa L.L.C. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of the Virgin Islands (Bankr. D.
V.I. Case No. 15-10003) on Sept. 15, 2015.  The petition was signed
by Sloan Schoyer as authorized signatory.  The Debtor has estimated
assets of $100 million to $500 million, and liabilities of more
than $1 billion.

Judge Mary F. Walrath is assigned to the case.  The Law Offices of
Richard H. Dollison, P.C., serves as the Debtor's counsel.  Prime
Clerk LLC is the Debtor's claims and noticing agent.  Alvarez &
Marsal North America, LLC to provide Thomas E. Hill as chief
restructuring officer, effective Sept. 15, 2015 petition date.

The U.S. Trustee appointed five creditors to serve on the committee
of creditors holding unsecured claims.


HUTCHESON MEDICAL: Trustee to Auction Fort Oglethorpe Hospital
--------------------------------------------------------------
ABI.org reported that the trustee in the bankruptcy of Hutcheson
Medical Center is asking a judge to authorize the sale of
financially ailing Fort Oglethorpe Hospital at auction.

In a separate report, Chattanoogan.com said that Trustee Ronald
Glass said there would be more value if the hospital is sold as a
going concern (still operating) rather than it having closed due to
mounting debt.

He is proposing that bidders for the hospital and its assets,
including a nursing home and a surgery center, be pre-qualified to
determine that they have the financial ability to make the
acquisition and the ability to operate the facility.

The 27-page motion says, "The trustee believes that the sale of the
sale assets as requested herein will provide a significantly
greater realization for the sale assets than the liquidation value
that would be obtained if the sale assets were not sold
expeditiously in the manner requested herein and the Debtors'
business was forced to cease operations."

There would be an auction date set that would be attended by only
qualified bidders, the trustee, Regions Bank, the Creditors
Committee and attorneys.

The motion says it is anticipated that a winning bidder would want
to retain current Hutcheson employees, but that is not a
requirement.

The trustee reserves the right to reject the bids.

The process would allow a "stalking horse bid."  That is defined as
"an attempt by a debtor to test the market in advance of an
auction. The intent is to maximize the value of its assets as part
of (or before) a court auction in case of bankruptcy."  An early
bid would give an indication of the potential hospital value, it
was stated.

The motion was filed on Oct. 13, 2015 in Rome, Georgia.

The motion asks for an immediate hearing on the motion to hold the
auction.

Hutcheson filed for bankruptcy last November, but since then has
acquired over $6 million in additional debt, it was stated at a
recent hearing.

The motion says, after the bankruptcy was filed, "the Debtors
determined, with the guidance and advice of its professional
advisors, the Committee and Regions, that the best and most
efficient exit strategy for the debtors from bankruptcy is a sale
of some or all of the debtors' assets to one or more purchasers."

Guggenheim Securities has been seeking buyers for the hospital.

Trustee Glass said he agrees "that the best and most efficient exit
strategy for the debtors' estate is a sale of some or all of the
debtors' assets."

He said Regions Bank "has a first-priority, properly perfected lien
and security interest in all or substantially all of the debtors'
assets."

Trustee Glass said, "In light of the debtors lack of liquidity, it
is imperative that the debtors' assets be sold as expeditiously as
possible."

He said a qualified bidder could bid on either a portion of the
hospital assets or all the assets.

Hutcheson is one of the largest employers in the Tri-County area
with over 800 employees.

                  About Hutcheson Medical Center

Hutcheson Medical Center, Inc., operates the 179-bed hospital and
related ancillary facilities, including, without limitation, a
skilled nursing home and an ambulatory surgery center, located in
Ft. Oglethorpe, Georgia, known as Hutcheson Medical Center.  HMC
leases the land and buildings that comprise the Medical Center from
The Hospital Authority of Walker, Dade and Catoosa Counties.

HMC and Hutcheson Medical Division, Inc., sought Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 14-42863 and
14-42864) in Rome, Georgia, on Nov. 20, 2014.  The cases are
jointly administered under Case No. 14-42863.

The cases have been assigned to the Honorable Paul W. Bonapfel.

The Debtors are represented by Ashley Reynolds Ray, Esq., and J.
Robert Williamson, Esq., at Scroggins and Williamson, in Atlanta,
Georgia.

The Debtors' Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure Statement are due March
20, 2015.

HMC disclosed $32.8 million in assets and $52.9 million in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

No request has been made for the appointment of a trustee or
examiner.


INTELLIPHARMACEUTICS INT'L: Presented at Dawson James Conference
----------------------------------------------------------------
Domenic Della Penna, chief financial officer of
Intellipharmaceutics International Inc., presented at the Dawson
James Securities Growth Stock Conference on Oct. 15, 2015.  A copy
of the Presentation materials is available for free at:

                       http://is.gd/5pOonu

                    About Intellipharmaceutics

Toronto, Canada-based Intellipharmaceutics International Inc. is
incorporated under the laws of Canada.  Intellipharmaceutics is a
pharmaceutical company specializing in the research, development
and manufacture of novel and generic controlled-release and
targeted-release oral solid dosage drugs.  Its patented
Hypermatrix(TM) technology is a multidimensional controlled-
release drug delivery platform that can be applied to the
efficient development of a wide range of existing and new
pharmaceuticals.  Based on this technology,
Intellipharmaceutics has a pipeline of product candidates in
various stages of development, including filings with the FDA in
therapeutic areas that include neurology, cardiovascular,
gastrointestinal tract, diabetes and pain.

Intellipharmaceutics reported a net loss of $3.85 million on $8.76
million of revenues for the year ended Nov. 30, 2014, compared with
a net loss of $11.5 million on $1.52 million of revenues for the
year ended Nov. 30, 2013.

As of Aug. 31, 2015, the Company had $6.21 million in total assets,
$3.87 million in total liabilities and $2.34 million in
shareholders' equity.

Deloitte LLP, in Toronto, Canada, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Nov. 30, 2014, citing that the Company's recurring losses
from operations and the accumulated deficit raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


JONES ENERGY: S&P Affirms 'B' CCR Then Withdraws Rating
-------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'B' corporate
credit rating on U.S.-based oil and gas exploration and production
company Jones Energy Inc.  At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B-'
issue-level ratings on senior unsecured debt issued by Jones Energy
Finance Corp. and Jones Energy Holdings LLC for Jones Energy Inc.

S&P then withdrew the corporate credit and debt ratings at the
company's request.



KHALIDI PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 4 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Khalidi Properties, LLC
        616 East 35th Street
        Savannah, GA 31401

Case No.: 15-41714

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 15, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Georgia (Savannah)

Debtor's Counsel: James L Drake, Jr., Esq.
                  JAMES L. DRAKE, JR. P.C.
                  P. O. Box 9945
                  Savannah, GA 31412
                  Tel: 912-790-1533
                  Email: jdrake7@bellsouth.net

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Ramsey Khalidi, authorized individual.

A list of the Debtor's four largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/gasb15-41714.pdf


LANNETT CO: S&P Assigns 'B+' CCR & Rates Proposed Facility 'B+'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'B+' corporate
credit rating to Philadelphia-based Lannett Co. Inc.  The outlook
is stable.

At the same time, S&P assigned its 'B+' issue-level rating to the
company's proposed senior secured credit facility.  The credit
facility consists of a $1.16 billion term loan due 2022 and a $125
million revolving bank loan due 2020.  The '3' recovery rating on
the facility reflects S&P's expectation of meaningful recovery (50%
to 70%, on the higher end of the range) in the event of payment
default.

"The ratings reflect relatively high business risk, illustrated by
a narrow portfolio and reliance on an outside party for 25% of pro
forma supply, along with significant integration risk for a
first-time acquisition of this magnitude," said Standard & Poor's
credit analyst Michael Berrian.  These risks are only partly offset
by high margins, good cash flows, and moderate leverage for the
rating category.

Lannett Co. Inc. is a small generic pharmaceutical manufacturer
that has a limited commercialized portfolio and product
concentration: its top three products, inclusive of the Kremers
Urban acquisition, account for 40% of pro forma sales.  This
top-product concentration, a reliance on one contract for two key
products, and the concurrent integration of a sizable acquisition
compare less favorably to generic pharmaceutical peers.  However,
the increased scale that S&P expects Lannett will obtain from
Kremers Urban, some added diversity (pre-acquisition, Lannett's top
three products accounted for 66% of revenue), and a growing
pipeline of products support S&P's assessment of a "weak" business
risk profile.

S&P's stable outlook reflects its belief that Lannett will generate
mid-single-digit organic revenue growth and sustain leverage in the
3x to 4x range in fiscal 2016.  The outlook also reflects S&P's
expectation that Lannett will generate at least $100 million of
free cash flow.

S&P could lower the rating if performance is weaker than expected,
resulting in leverage increasing to 5x or more over the next 12
months.  This would likely stem from issues integrating Kremers
Urban or from organic revenue declines, possibly from an inability
to increase prices or volumes of its existing products.  In order
for this to occur in fiscal 2016, revenues and gross margins would
have to decline by at least 10 percentage points.

In S&P's view, upside potential is limited over the next year and
linked to improving business risk.  S&P could raise the rating if
Lannett obtains greater scale, apart from the scale it is expected
to achieve with the Kremers Urban acquisition.  S&P thinks it is
unlikely that the company could achieve such a development while
maintaining current debt protection measures.  Separately, an
improvement in credit measures is unlikely to result in a higher
rating since S&P believes the company will need excess capacity to
make diversifying acquisitions or to absorb possible price and
volume fluctuations in its product portfolio.



LEA POWER: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' Rating on $252.6MM Sr. Sec. Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Lea Power Partners, LLC's (LPP) $252.6
million senior secured notes due 2033 at 'BB+'.  The Rating Outlook
is Stable.

The rating of the Lea Power Project (LPP) derives from the
project's fixed-price tolling style agreement with Southwestern
Public Service (SPS, rated 'BBB'/Stable Outlook by Fitch).  The
tolling agreement provides revenue stability for LPP while
mitigating supply risk, as SPS is responsible for providing fuel to
the project.  Following an increase from original projections,
operating costs have stabilized in conjunction with a Long Term
Service Agreement (LTSA) with Mitsubishi.  However, rating case
coverage ratios are not sufficient to reach an investment grade
rating.  The Stable Outlook reflects the project is expected to
continue to perform near base case levels.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Revenue Risk: Midrange

Stable Revenue Profile - The project is supported by a 25-year
tolling agreement with SPS under which SPS purchases capacity,
energy and ancillary services through 2033.  Capacity payments
provide roughly 80%-90% of the total revenues at a fixed price over
the power purchase agreement (PPA) term.

Supply Risk: Stronger

Mitigated Supply Risk - The PPA with SPS is structured as a tolling
agreement, largely eliminating price and volume risks associated
with natural gas supply as SPS is responsible for providing the
fuel to the project site.

Operation Risk: Midrange

Stabilized Operating Performance - The project has maintained high
availability, strengthening already contracted revenues through the
generation of dispatch availability revenues.  Despite historic
variability during major overhaul years, the LTSA helps to smooth
operating costs over the contract term, set to expire in 2022.

Debt Structure: Midrange

Typical Debt Structure - Debt structure features include a
six-month debt service reserve, working capital reserve and a major
maintenance reserve based on 100% of the current year overhaul
expenses and 50% of the following year's expenses, which Fitch
views as typical for a thermal power project.

Adequate Debt Service Coverage - Despite early operational
challenges that pushed debt service coverage ratios (DSCR) to near
breakeven, historical DSCRs have averaged 1.25x since 2008 with an
initial LPP 2015 forecast DSCR of 1.35x.  Under Fitch's rating case
conditions, which incorporate a 10% increase to operations and
maintenance expenses as well as increased outages with 95.1%
availability, DSCRs are projected to average 1.37x with a minimum
of 1.20x through debt maturity.

Comparable to Peers - Lea Power's DSCR profile is comparable to CE
Generation, LLC ('BB-'/Stable Outlook) and other privately rated
peers within Fitch's portfolio.  CE Generation is exposed to market
based pricing and faces structural subordination, resulting in a
lower debt rating.  A privately rated combined cycle peer
(BBB-/Stable Outlook) exhibits a similar contracted structure as
LPP, but maintains stronger coverage averaging 1.44x under Fitch's
rating case.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Negative - Operating performance shortfall: A significant and
sustained change to the operating performance and availability of
the project reducing financial cushion below 1.30x could result in
a downgrade.

Negative/Positive - Cost profile changes: Persistent operating
costs above 10% could negatively affect the rating, while sustained
long term cost reductions could result in improved project cash
flow consistent with a higher rating level.

CREDIT UPDATE

Project performance remained near base case expectations with DSCRs
of 1.37x for 2014.  However, Fitch expects total coverage to fall
below base case expectations in 2015, as the project incurred an
outage following a planned maintenance overhaul in Q4, 2014. The
outage was characterized as an arc fault, exacerbated by a
malfunctioning neutral grounding transformer secondary trip
circuit.  Total repair costs of approximately $820 thousand were
borne by the project with $3.1 million in lost revenues from
unplanned downtime.  DSCRs for 2015 through June are 1.24x, but are
expected to increase through the remainder of the year as the
project gained efficiencies following the F4 turbine overhaul.  LPP
management initially budgeted year-end 2015 coverage levels of
approximately 1.35x, but expects to achieve DSCRs of approximately
1.30x following the outage.

The project derives the majority of its revenue from capacity
payments (85.9% of total revenue in 2014), mitigating revenue
volatility due to reduced output.  In 2014, total revenue decreased
1.5% ($55.9 million) coinciding with a reduction to the capacity
factor (55% compared to 63% during 2013).  Stemming from the
aforementioned efficiencies gained following the major maintenance,
the project has tested below its contracted heat rate and achieved
a capacity factor of 74% through June 2015.  As a result, LPP
expects to receive a $1.2 million payment per year as part of the
PPA with SPS.  Total revenue equals approximately $26.9 million
through June 2015.

Total plant expenses in 2014 declined approximately 6.9% to $14.2
million, driven by a $1.57 million decline in property tax.  The
reduction in property tax resulted from a statutory allowance for
semi-annual property tax payments, and the remaining 50% of the
cost will be paid during 2015.  LPP management initially estimated
property tax to increase to approximately $2.4 million in 2015,
with preliminary budgeted expenses at $14.3 million.  Total project
expenses equal $6.4 million through June 2015.  In addition to
plant expenses, LPP pays for major maintenance through the LTSA
with Mitsubishi.  The major maintenance expense increased to $4.7
million in 2014, up from $3.9 million in 2013.  LPP expects major
maintenance to increase to approximately $6 million in 2015
following the outage.

Fitch's rating case contemplates debt service coverage under
stressed conditions aimed to capture increases in fixed and
variable operation and maintenance (O&M) costs, as well as a
reduction to plant availability.  Debt service coverage in 2016
will be 1.30x in Fitch's rating case.  Over the full debt term,
rating case DSCRs average 1.37x, with a minimum of 1.20x (2032).
The profile strengthens coinciding with the expiration of the LTSA
with Mitsubishi, but remains susceptible to low coverage from
increased O&M expenditures.

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

The project consists of a 604 megawatt natural gas fired,
combined-cycle electric generating facility selling energy and
capacity under a 25-year PPA with SPS.  SPS purchases capacity at a
fixed price and obtains full dispatch rights over the facility. LPP
is reimbursed for nonfuel variable operating costs through a
separate fixed-price energy payment.  The PPA is structured as a
tolling agreement, and SPS is responsible for providing natural gas
fuel.  SPS is a fully integrated, investor-owned electric utility
serving New Mexico and parts of Texas.  The project entered into an
LTSA with Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc. in 2011 which is
set to expire in 2022 based on projected run hours.  FREIF North
American Power, LLC owns a 100% indirect equity interest in LPP and
provides the liquidity reserve letter of credit.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by a first priority interest in all real and
personal property, tangible and intangible assets, revenues,
accounts, project documents and ownership interests in LPP.



LIFE PARTNERS: FIFC to Finance Purchase of Insurance Policies
-------------------------------------------------------------
The bankruptcy trustee of Life Partners Holdings Inc. received
court approval to enter into an insurance premium finance agreement
with FIRST Insurance Funding Corp.

Under the agreement, FIFC will provide financing to the company for
the purchase of insurance policies necessary for the operation of
its business.

In exchange for the financing, the insurance company will get a
"first priority" lien on and security interest in unearned
premiums, which are senior to the lien of lenders that provided
financing to get Life Partners through bankruptcy.

The order was issued by Judge Russell Nelms of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas.

                     About Life Partners

Headquartered in Waco, Texas, Life Partners Holdings, Inc. --
http://www.lphi.com/-- is the parent company engaged in the
secondary market for life insurance, commonly called "life
settlements."  Since its incorporation in 1991, Life Partners,
Inc. has completed over 162,000 transactions for its worldwide
client base of over 30,000 high net worth individuals and
institutions in connection with the purchase of over 6,500 policies
totaling over $3.2 billion in face value.

LPHI is a publicly traded company incorporated in Texas and its
common stock has been delisted from the NASDAQ (formerly trading
under the symbol LPHI).

Life Partners Holdings sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 15-40289) on Jan. 20,
2015.

The case is assigned to Judge Russell F. Nelms.  J. Robert Forshey,
Esq., at Forshey & Prostok, LLP, serves as counsel to the Debtor.

LPHI disclosed $2,406,137 in assets and $52,722,308 in liabilities
as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
tapped Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., as counsel.

Tracy A. Bolt of BDO USA, LLP was named as examiner for the
Debtor's case.  At the behest of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, the U.S. Trustee, and the Creditors Committee, the
Court ordered the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee.  On March
13, 2015, H. Thomas Moran II was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee in
LPHI's case.  The trustee is represented by Thompson & Knight LLP.

The Chapter 11 trustee signed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions for
LPHI's subsidiaries on May 19, 2015: Life Partners Inc. (Case No.
15-41995) and LPI Financial Services, Inc. (Case No. 15-41996).

Life Partners is estimated to have $100 million to $500 million in
assets and more than $1 billion in debt.  LPI Financial estimated
less than $50,000.


MALIBU LIGHTING: Oct. 20 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on Oct. 20, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of Malibu Lighting Corporation, et al.

The meeting will be held at:

         The DoubleTree Hotel
         700 King St.
         Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.  Section 1103 of the
Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may consult with the
debtor, investigate the debtor and its business operations and
participate in the formulation of a plan of reorganization.  The
Committee may also perform other services as are in the interests
of the unsecured creditors whom it represents.



MIDWAY GOLD: Subsidiary Seeks Authorization to Sell Spring Valley
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Midway Gold Corp.'s subsidiary, Midway Gold US Inc. (the Company or
Midway), has filed a complaint in United States Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Colorado (the Court), where it filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code on June 22, 2015, seeking authority under Section
363(h) of the Bankruptcy Code to sell 100% of the assets of a joint
venture known as Spring Valley located in Pershing County, Nevada.
Midways partner in the joint venture is Barrick Gold Exploration,
Inc.  Midway is requesting the Court to authorize Midway to sell
the entire Spring Valley property on behalf of both Barrick and
Midway, as well as enjoining Barrick from pursuing an independent
sale of its ownership interest in the joint venture.  Midway
believes that such a sale provides the best path to maximize the
value of its interest in Spring Valley.

                       About Midway Gold

Midway Gold Corp., incorporated on May 14, 1996 under the laws of
the Province of British Columbia, Canada, is engaged in the
acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties
located in the state of Nevada and Washington.

Midway Gold operates primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiary
located in the United States, Midway Gold US Inc.  The executive
offices are in Englewood, Colorado.  Midway US currently has one
gold producing property: the Pan gold mine located in White Pine
County, Nevada.  Midway also has gold properties which are
exploratory stage projects where gold mineralization has been
identified, such as the Tonopah project in Nye County, Nevada, the
Gold Rock project in White Pine County, Nevada, and the Golden
Eagle project in Ferry County, Washington.  Out of these projects,
a permitting process has been undertaken only for the Gold Rock
project.  Finally, Midway's Spring Valley property, another gold
property located in Pershing County, Nevada, is subject to a joint
venture with Barrick Gold Exploration Inc.

On June 22, 2015, Midway Gold US Inc. and 12 related entities,
including parent Midway Gold Corp. each filed a petition in the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado seeking relief
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.  The Debtors' cases
have been assigned to Judge Michael E. Romero.  

Judge Michael E. Romero directed the joint administration of the
cases under Case No. 15-16835.

The Debtors tapped Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP as lead bankruptcy
counsel; Sender Wasserman Wadsworth, P.C., as special bankruptcy
and restructuring counsel; DLA Piper (Canada) LLP, as Canadian
bankruptcy counsel; Ernst & Young Inc., as information officer of
Canadian court; RBC Capital Markets, as investment banker; FTI
Consulting as financial advisor; and Epiq Solutions, as claims and
noticing agent.

Midway Gold Corp. disclosed $184 million in assets and $62.4
million in liabilities as of March 31, 2015.  Midway Gold US Inc.,
disclosed total assets of $2,461,673 and total liabilities of  
$122,448,181 as of the Chapter 11 filing.

In July, the U.S. Trustee overseeing the Debtors' cases appointed
seven creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.  The creditors are American Assay Laboratories, EPC
Services Company, InFaith Community Foundation, Jacobs Engineering
Group Inc., SRK Consulting (US) Inc., Sunbelt Rentals, and Boart
Longyear.  Gavin/Solmonese LLC serves as its financial advisor.



MONAKER GROUP: Incurs $1.11 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Monaker Group, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $1.11 million on $149,000 of total revenues for the three months
ended Aug. 31, 2015, compared with a net loss of $1.88 million on
$406,000 of total revenue for the same period a year ago.

For the six months ended Aug. 31, 2015, the Company reported a net
loss of $3.83 million on $485,000 of total revenues compared with a
net loss of $2.43 million on $751,000 of total revenues for the
same period during the prior year.

As of Aug. 31, 2015, the Company had $6.90 million in total assets,
$9.88 million in total liabilities and a $2.98 million total
stockholders' deficit.

At Aug. 31, 2015, the Company had $20,400 cash on-hand, a decrease
of $206,000 from $226,000 at the start of fiscal 2016.  The
decrease in cash was due primarily to operating expenses, Web
site development costs and advances to affiliates.

Monaker Group separately filed with the SEC a Notification of Late
Filing on Form 12b-25 with respect to its quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended Aug. 31, 2015.  The Company said it was
not able to obtain all information prior to filing date and the
accountant could not complete the required financial statements and
management could not complete Management's Discussion and Analysis
of such financial statements by Oct. 15, 2015.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        http://is.gd/YliCVc

                        About Monaker Group

Monaker Group, Inc., formerly known as Next 1 Interactive, Inc., is
a digital media marketing company focusing on lifestyle enrichment
for consumers in the travel, home and employment sectors.  Core to
its marketing services are key elements including proprietary
video-centered technology and established partnerships that enhance
its reach.  Video is quickly becoming consumer's preferred method
of searching and educating themselves prior to purchases.
Monaker's video creation technology and film libraries combine to
create lifestyle video offerings that can be shared both to its
customers and through trusted distribution systems of its major
partners.  The end result is better engagement with consumers who
gain in-depth information on related products and services helping
to both inform and fulfill purchases.  Unlike traditional marketing
companies that simply charge for advertising creation, Monaker
holds licenses and/or expertise in the travel, real estate and
employment sectors allowing it to capture fees at the point of
purchase while the majority of transactions are handled by
Monaker's partners.  This should allow the company to capture
greater revenues while eliminating much of the typical overhead
associated with fulfillment.  Monaker core holdings include
Maupintour, NameYourFee.com, RealBiz Media Group - helping it to
deliver marketing solutions to consumers at home, work and play.

Next 1 Interactive reported a net loss of $50,500 on $1.1 million
of total revenue for the year ended Feb. 28, 2015, compared with a
net loss of $18.3 million on $1.5 million of total revenues for the
year ended Feb. 28, 2014.

D'Arelli Pruzansky, P.A., in Boca Raton, Florida, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Feb. 28, 2015, citing that the Company has incurred
an operating loss of $5.44 million and net cash used in operations
of $2.62 million for the year ended Feb. 28, 2015, and the Company
had an accumulated deficit of $86.1 million and a working capital
deficit of $12.8 million at Feb. 28, 2015.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


MOUNTAIN PROVINCE: Appoints Vice President Diamond Marketing
------------------------------------------------------------
Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. announced the appointment of Reid
Mackie to the position of vice president Diamond Marketing
effective Oct. 15, 2015.

Mr. Mackie joins Mountain Province Diamonds from Rio Tinto Diamonds
where he held the positions of manager sales and marketing for
Argyle Pink Diamonds in Perth, Australia (2011 to 2015) and senior
executive trader in Antwerp, Belgium (1999 to 2010).  At Argyle Mr.
Mackie was responsible for the pricing and sales of all Argyle pink
polished diamonds including the Argyle pink diamond tender.  In
Antwerp Mr. Mackie was responsible for the valuation and sales of
rough diamonds from the Diavik, Argyle, Murowa, Ellendale and
Merlin diamond mines.

Mountain Province President and CEO Patrick Evans commented: "We
welcome Reid to Mountain Province at a very exciting time for the
company as we begin to prepare for the first sales of diamonds from
the Gahcho Kue diamond mine.  His considerable experience in taking
new mine production to the market will benefit Mountain Province
greatly as we seek to maximise revenue from our share of the Gahcho
Kue production."

Mr. Mackie is a graduate of the University of British Columbia
(B.A., 1994).

Mountain Province Diamonds is a 49% participant with De Beers
Canada in the Gahcho Kue diamond mine located in Canada's Northwest
Territories.  Gahcho Kue is the world's largest and richest new
diamond mine.

The Gahcho Kue Project consists of a cluster of four diamondiferous
kimberlites, three of which have a probable mineral reserve of 35.4
million tonnes grading 1.57 carats per tonne for total diamond
content of 55.5 million carats.

A 2014 NI 43-101 feasibility study report filed by Mountain
Province (available on SEDAR) indicates that the Gahcho Kue project
has an IRR of 32.6%.

The Gahcho Kue diamond mine is expected to produce an average of
4.5 million carats a year over a 12 year mine life.

                About Mountain Province Diamonds

Headquartered in Toronto, Canada, Mountain Province Diamonds Inc.
(TSX: MPV, NYSE AMEX: MDM) -- http://www.mountainprovince.com/--
is a Canadian resource company in the process of permitting and
developing a diamond deposit known as the "Gahcho Kue Project"
located in the Northwest Territories of Canada.  The Company's
primary asset is its 49 percent interest in the Gahcho Kue
Project.

Mountain Province incurred a net loss of C$4.39 million in 2014,  a
net loss of C$26.6 million in 2013 and a net loss of C$3.33 million
in 2012.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had C$510.3 million in total
assets, C$165.7 million in total liabilities and C$344.6 million in
total shareholders' equity.

KPMG LLP, in Toronto, Canada, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company's ability to continue
operations is dependent upon its ability to obtain sufficient
financing to fund its operations and development costs.


MULTI PACKAGING SOLUTIONS: Moody's Affirms B2 Corp. Family Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the B2 corporate family rating
and B2-PD probability of default rating of Multi Packaging
Solutions Limited and revised outlook to positive from negative on
expectations that the company will use the majority of the proceeds
from its initial public offering to reduce debt and further improve
credit metrics. Moody's also affirmed B1 senior secured credit
facilities rating and Caa1 senior unsecured notes rating.

Moody's took the following actions:

Multi Packaging Solutions Limited

-- Affirmed B2 corporate family rating

-- Affirmed B2-PD probability of default rating

-- Affirmed senior secured bank credit facilities -- B1, LGD 3

-- The outlook was changed to positive from negative

Multi Packaging Solutions, Inc (New)

-- Affirmed senior unsecured note - Caa1, LGD6

RATINGS RATIONALE

The revision of the rating outlook to positive reflects improved
leverage and transparency as well as expectations that credit
metrics will continue to strengthen if the company completes its
initial public offering (IPO) and uses the proceeds to pay down
debt. The company is offering 12.5 million shares in the primary
offering and 6.5 million shares in a secondary offering, according
to a regulatory filing. The company estimated that its shares may
price at $15-$17 and it hopes to close the IPO in October 2015. At
mid-point price of $16 a share, the company is expected to raise
approximately $200 million in a primary offering and plans to use
approximately $180 million of the proceeds after transaction
expenses to pay down debt. Pro forma for the debt pay-down from the
IPO proceeds and completed acquisitions, Moody's expects
Multi-Packaging debt/EBITDA in the twelve months ended June 30,
2015 to decline to 4.2x from the current level of 5.2x, which
supports a positive outlook. Even if the company does not complete
the IPO, we expect metrics to improve in fiscal 2016 from
additional EBITDA from completed acquisitions and modest organic
growth in main consumer and healthcare packaging markets, somewhat
offset by negative forex impact. Earnings growth and reduced
acquisition and restructuring costs should also support free cash
flow improvement in fiscal 2016, indicating further improvement in
credit metrics. We assume that all free cash flow not used for
acquisitions will be used to pay down debt.

The B2 corporate family rating reflects financial, operational and
integration risks associated with the acquisition-driven growth
strategy as well as majority private equity ownership, even post
the IPO, which typically entails elevated financial risks.
Additional rating constraints include the risks associated with
growth and retention of market position in the highly competitive
paper packaging industry, as well as limited record of audited
financial results for the combined company. With the 2015 audited
financials filing, the transparency has improved and we anticipate
further improvement if the company completes the IPO and starts
filing public financial statements. The rating reflects modest
leverage pro forma for debt pay-down from IPO proceeds, strong
EBITDA margins, reasonable interest coverage and retained cash flow
relative to debt. The company benefits from geographic and customer
diversity as well as reliance on relatively stable consumer
packaging and health care end markets, which offset exposure to the
multi-media packaging, which is in secular decline. The company
also benefits from good liquidity.

The rating could be upgraded if the company continues to generate
positive free cash flow and reduce leverage. The rating could also
be upgraded if management publicly commits to maintaining moderate
leverage targets and delevering while continuing its
acquisition-driven growth strategy. Specifically, the rating could
be upgraded if the company continues to improve EBITDA and free
cash flow generation, sustaining debt-to-EBITDA below 4.5 times and
RCF/Debt above 10%.

Ratings could be lowered if Multi Packaging encountered unexpected
difficulty in implementing its integration plans, diminishing
revenue growth and lowering margins over the near term. The
negative effects of such an event would be exacerbated if it were
to coincide with a drop in demand due to weakness in economic
drivers, such as during a recession. Lower ratings could be
prompted if debt to EBITDA rose above 6 times, EBITDA to interest
were to fall below 1.5 times or if retained cash flow were to fall
below 8% of debt. A material weakening in liquidity, evidenced by a
pattern of negative free cash flow or substantial drawings on
revolving credit facilities, could also pressure ratings.

Multi Packaging, through its main operating subsidiaries in the US
and Europe, is a global provider of consumer packaging products and
solutions to the consumer, health care, and multi-media markets.
Following the proposed IPO, equity sponsors The Carlyle Group and
Madison Dearborn Partners, Inc. will own approximately 73% of the
company's shares. Revenue for the twelve months ended June 30, 2015
totaled $1.6 billion ($1.8 billion pro forma for completed
acquisitions).



MUSCLEPHARM CORP: ANB Bank Extends Loan Maturity to 2016
--------------------------------------------------------
MusclePharm Corporation entered into loan modification agreements
with ANB Bank on Oct. 9, 2015, pursuant to which ANB Bank agreed to
(i) extend the maturity date of the loans to Jan. 15, 2016, (ii)
not to declare the facility in default prior to Dec. 10, 2015,
except for defaults resulting from failure to make timely payments
of amounts due under the facility, and (iii) to delete certain
financial covenants from the original revolving loan agreement.

In consideration for these modifications, Mr. Ryan Drexler,
chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, and Ms. Jodi
Drexler-Billet, an individual indirect investor and a sibling of
Mr. Drexler, each executed an Individual Guaranty for the remaining
balance of approximately $6,200,000 and the Company's performance
under the loan agreements, as amended.

In consideration for executing his guaranty, the Company issued Mr.
Drexler, the executive chairman of the Company, 28,571 shares of
the Company's common stock with a valuation based on the closing
price of the Company's common stock on Oct. 9, 2015.  The issuance
is approved unanimously by the Board of Directors of the Company,
including all independent directors.  The Board, after deliberation
and consideration of the related party transaction component,
determined that it was a fair and reasonable transaction negotiated
at arm's length.

                         About MusclePharm

Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, MusclePharm Corporation
(OTC BB: MSLP) -- http://www.muslepharm.com/-- is a healthy life-
style company that develops and manufactures a full line of
National Science Foundation approved nutritional supplements that
are 100 percent free of banned substances.  MusclePharm is sold in
over 120 countries and available in over 5,000 U.S. retail
outlets, including GNC and Vitamin Shoppe.  MusclePharm products
are also sold in over 100 online stores, including
bodybuilding.com, Amazon.com and Vitacost.com.

MusclePharm Corporation reported a net loss of $13.8 million in
2014, a net loss of $17.7 million in 2013 and a net loss of $19
million in 2012.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $75.1 million in total assets,
$56.9 million in total liabilities and $18.1 million in total
stockholders' equity.


NET ELEMENT: Notes Moratorium Date Expires
------------------------------------------
Net Element, Inc., entered into two letter agreements dated Aug. 4,
2015, with certain qualified institutional investors and certain
institutional accredited investors listed in the Securities
Purchase Agreement (Senior Convertible Notes and Warrants) (the
"Debt and Warrants SPA") and the Securities Purchase Agreement
(Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company).

Among other things, the Letter Agreements provide that, absent a
written agreement otherwise, all Notes (as defined in the Debt and
Warrants SPA) will be automatically null and void as of the
Moratorium Date with no obligations or liabilities whatsoever of
the Company relating thereto; (ii) the investors' right to
purchase, and the Company's obligation to issue, Additional Notes
and Additional Warrants (each, as defined in the Debt and Warrant
SPA) will be automatically null and void as of the Moratorium Date
with no obligations or liabilities whatsoever of the Company
relating thereto; and (iii) within five business days from the
Moratorium Date, the investors will return to the Company the
originals of all Notes for cancellation by the Company.  The
Moratorium Date has expired.

As a result of the expiration of the Moratorium Date, the Company's
indebtedness and all obligations under the Notes, as well as the
Company's obligation to issue Additional Notes and Additional
Warrants, are cancelled effective as of 11:59 pm EST on Oct. 11,
2015.

In addition, due to the fact that the Warrants (as defined in the
Debt and Warrants SPA) were issued in conjunction and together with
the Notes pursuant to the Debt and Warrants SPA, the Company and
the Investors are engaged in discussions to address disagreements
relating to the Warrants.

                          About Net Element

Miami, Fla.-based Net Element International, Inc., formerly Net
Element, Inc., currently operates several online media Web sites
in the film, auto racing and emerging music talent markets.

Net Element reported a net loss of $10.2 million on $21.2
million of net revenue for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2014,
compared to a net loss of $48.3 million on $18.7 million of net
revenues for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2013.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $25.8 million in total assets,
$14.5 million in total liabilities, and stockholders' equity of
$11.2 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in Miami, Florida, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.  The accounting firm
said that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations
and has used substantial amounts of cash to fund its operating
activities that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


NET ELEMENT: Oleg Firer Reports 3.7% Equity Stake as of Oct. 7
--------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Oleg Firer disclosed that as of Oct. 7, 2015, he
beneficially owns 2,901,276 shares of common stock of Net Element
Inc. representing 3.7 percent of the shares outstanding.  A copy of
the regulatory filing is available at http://is.gd/H1XXZy

                         About Net Element

Miami, Fla.-based Net Element International, Inc., formerly Net
Element, Inc., currently operates several online media Web sites
in the film, auto racing and emerging music talent markets.

Net Element reported a net loss of $10.18 million on $21.2
million of net revenues for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2014,
compared to a net loss of $48.3 million on $18.7 million of net
revenues for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2013.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $25.8 million in total assets,
$14.5 million in total liabilities, and total stockholders' equity
of $11.2 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in Miami, Florida, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.  The accounting firm
said that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations
and has used substantial amounts of cash to fund its operating
activities that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


NEW SPRING: Case Summary & 13 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: New Spring, LLC
        10195 Main St., Suite M
        Fairfax, VA 22031

Case No.: 15-13601

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 15, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria)

Judge: Hon. Brian F. Kenney

Debtor's Counsel: John P. Forest, II, Esq.
                  STAHLZELLOE, P.C.
                  11350 Random Hill Rd., Suite 700
                  Fairfax, VA 22030
                  Tel: (703) 691-4940
                  Email: j.forest@stahlzelloe.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Abbas Ghassemi, manager.

A list of the Debtor's 13 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb15-13601.pdf


NORD RESOURCES: Receiver Wants Chapter 11 Case Dismissed
--------------------------------------------------------
Nord Resources Corporation, which is producing copper at its
Johnson Camp Mine in Arizona, filed a bare-bones Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 15-13197) on Oct. 15,
2015, estimating both assets and liabilities in the range of $50
million to $100 million.  Ron Hirsch signed the petition as
chairman.

The Debtor has engaged Eric Slocum Sparks PC as counsel.  Judge
Scott H. Gan is assigned to the case.

Concurrently with the initiation of the Chapter 11 case,
Christopher G. Linscott of Keegan, Linscott & Kenon, P.C., a
court-appointed receiver of the assets of Nord, filed a motion with
the Bankruptcy Court seeking the dismissal of the bankruptcy case
as an unauthorized filing.  According to Mr. Linscott, the
bankruptcy petition was signed by a party without authority and was
a bad faith attempt to avoid or delay the scheduled sale of Nord's
assets.

In the alternative, the Receiver asks the Bankruptcy Court to
exercise its discretion and abstain, dismiss, or suspend the
bankruptcy case pursuant to Section 305 of the Bankruptcy Code.

"In either scenario, the Receiver requests the Bankruptcy Court
maintain jurisdiction to determine sanctions for the improper
filing, and the damages caused, pursuant to either Rule 9011 of the
Bankruptcy Rules of Procedure, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of
Procedure, or the inherent powers of the Court," Mr. McGrath
maintains.

Mr. Linscott, who was appointed Receiver on Nov. 18, 2014, at the
request of Nedbank Ltd., cited a provision in the Receivership
Order which states that "the Receiver shall have the power and
authority to file a chapter 7 or 11 bankruptcy petition.  Such
right to file a chapter 7 or 11 shall be the exclusive right of the
Receiver."

On the day of the bankruptcy filing, a hearing took place in the
Pima County Superior Court to authorize the Receiver to sell the
assets of Nord.  No objections to the Sale were filed.

Michael McGrath, Esq., at Mesch, Clark & Rothschild, P.C., attorney
to the Receiver, says "This delay in the sales process has created
havoc for the funding of mine operations and for the employees,
vendors, and parties contractually related to Nord."

This is the second Sale Motion filed by the Receiver.  The first
request, which was filed on April 20, 2015, was approved by the
State Court, but was never consummated.


NORD RESOURCES: Section 341 Meeting Set for Dec. 3
--------------------------------------------------
A meeting of creditors in the bankruptcy case of Nord Resources
Corporation has been scheduled for Dec. 3, 2015, at 12:00 p.m. at
U.S. Trustee Meeting Room, James A. Walsh Court, 38 S Scott Ave, St
140, Tucson, Arizona.

This is the first meeting of creditors required under Section
341(a) of the Bankruptcy Code in all bankruptcy cases.

All creditors are invited, but not required, to attend.  This
meeting of creditors offers the one opportunity in a bankruptcy
proceeding for creditors to question a responsible office of the
Debtor under oath about the company's financial affairs and
operations that would be of interest to the general body of
creditors.

                        About Nord Resources

Nord Resources Corporation sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No.: 15-13197) on Oct. 15, 2015.  The
petition was signed by Ron Hirsch as chairman.  The Debtor
estimated both assets and liabilities of $50 million to $100
million.  Eric Slocum Sparks PC represents the Debtor as counsel.
Judge Scott H. Gan is assigned to the case.


NORD RESOURCES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Nord Resources Corporation
        One West Wetmore #203
        Tucson, AZ 85705

Case No.: 15-13197

Type of Business: Copper mine

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 15, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Arizona (Tucson)

Judge: Hon. Scott H. Gan

Debtor's Counsel: Eric Slocum Sparks, Esq.
                  ERIC SLOCUM SPARKS PC
                  110 S Church Ave #2270
                  Tucson, AZ 85701
                  Tel: 520-623-8330
                  Fax: 520-623-9157
                  Email: law@ericslocumsparkspc.com

Estimated Assets: $50 million to $100 million

Estimated Debts: $50 million to $100 million

The petition was signed by Ron Hirsch, chairman.

The Debtor did not include a list of its largest unsecured
creditors when it filed the petition.


PREMIER EXHIBITIONS: Incurs $3.46 Million Net Loss in 2nd Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Premier Exhibitions, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $3.46 million on $6.73 million of total revenue for the three
months ended Aug. 31, 2015, compared with a net loss of $1.85
million on $8.29 million of total revenue for the same period a
year ago.

For the six months ended Aug. 31, 2015, the Company reported a net
loss of $6 million on $13.98 million of total revenue compared to a
net loss of $3.22 million on $15.8 million of total revenue for the
same period during the prior year.

As of Aug. 31, 2015, the Company had $35.89 million in total
assets, $32.2 million in total liabilities, $2.66 million in equity
attributable to shareholders of the Company and $1.02 million in
equity attributable to non-controlling interest.

                        Bankruptcy Warning

On April 2, 2015, the Company announced that it had entered into a
definitive merger agreement whereby it plans to combine with
Dinoking Tech Inc.  Under the Merger Agreement, the DK shareholders
will be entitled to up to 24% of the fully diluted ownership of the
Company for all of the issued and outstanding shares of DK.  In
addition, an investor group has agreed to provide up to $13.5
million in convertible debt funding to Premier to repay $8 million
of existing debt and $5.5 million for corporate purposes including
the completion of the development of "Saturday Night Live: The
Exhibition" and "Premier Exhibitions 5th Avenue," the Company's
state-of-the-art exhibition and special events center located in
New York City.  As of August 31, 2015, the investor group had
provided the entire $13.5 million of funding.  Upon closing of the
merger transaction, the debt will be convertible into shares of the
Company based on a price of $4.48 per share, if the conversion is
approved by shareholders.  The Company used this funding to retire
the debt owed to Pentwater Capital, to continue funding
improvements on the building at 417 Fifth Avenue, and to complete
our "Saturday Night Live" exhibition.  The transaction has been
approved by the Board of Directors of Premier.  Premier's principal
shareholder, Sellers Capital, LLC, and the directors and officers
of the Company have entered into agreements to vote in favor of the
transaction.  The completion of the transaction is subject to
Premier shareholder approval among other customary closing
conditions.  The shareholder meeting to approve the transaction is
expected to be held on Oct. 29, 2015.  The merger is expected to be
completed on Oct. 29, 2015.

"While the Company recently repaid a loan of $8.0 million, the
Company will have to repay $13.5 million received in convertible
debt funding if the merger transaction does not close.  As a
result, the Company will have to refinance the debt or obtain funds
to repay the debt in full if that occurs.  In addition, if the
merger transaction is terminated under certain conditions the
Company would be required to pay a $1 million breakup fee to DK.
The Company could be capital constrained and unable to fulfill the
terms of this and other agreements if its access to capital sources
does not improve in the near term.

"If the Merger Agreement transactions are not approved by
shareholders, or additional financing is not obtained, the Company
may have to seek the protection of the U.S. bankruptcy laws and/or
cease operating as a going concern.  In addition, if the Company
does not meet its payment obligations to third parties as they come
due, the Company may be subject to an involuntary bankruptcy
proceeding or other litigation claims, which it would likely not
have the resources to defend," the Company states in the report.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                       http://is.gd/T0gztk

                     About Premier Exhibitions

Premier Exhibitions, Inc., develops, deploys and operates
exhibition products that are presented to the public in exhibition
centers, museums and non-traditional venues.  The Atlanta-based
Company's exhibitions generate income primarily through ticket
sales, third-party licensing, sponsorship and merchandise sales.

Premier Exhibitions reported a net loss of $11.7 million on $29.4
million of total revenue for the year ended Feb. 28, 2015, compared
with a net loss of $778,000 on $29.3 million of total revenue for
the year ended Feb. 28, 2014.


PREMIER EXHIBITIONS: Reports $3.46M Loss for Aug. 31 Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Premier Exhibitions, Inc., reported a net loss of $3.46 million on
$6.73 million of total revenue for the three months ended Aug. 31,
2015, compared to a net loss of $1.85 million on $8.29 million of
total revenue for the same period in 2014.

For the six months ended Aug. 31, 2015, the Company reported a net
loss of $6 million on $13.98 million of total revenue compared to a
net loss of $3.22 million on $15.8 million of total revenue for the
same period a year ago.

As of Aug. 31, 2015, the Company had $35.9 million in total assets,
$32.2 million in total liabilities, $2.66 million in equity
attributable to shareholders of the Company, and $1.02 million in
equity attributable to non-controlling interest.

Michael Little, Premier's interim president and chief executive
officer, stated, "Our Saturday Night Live exhibition ticket sales
have unfortunately been significantly below our expectations.  We
fully appreciate the importance of our New York exhibition facility
to our future growth and profitability and we are exploring all
options to both enhance the facility's revenue streams and reduce
our operating costs.  To that end we plan on opening a second
exhibition, 'The Discovery of King Tut,' in our New York City
location in November 2015."

Little continued, "We need additional financing to be able to
continue our operations.  We have a working capital deficit of $1.4
million excluding the convertible debt of $13.5 million, which is
included in the short term portion of note payable on the balance
sheet.  We believe through management of our cash flow and payment
obligations that the Company should reach the expected merger date
of October 29, 2015 without the need for incremental financing.
However, post-merger management believes that the Company will need
up to $5.0 million of additional capital to fund ongoing operations
and to bring accounts payable and accrued liabilities current.
This amount should be sufficient to return the Company to at least
break-even operations in the near term, assuming that management's
plan of operations is achieved.  If we are unable to obtain
additional financing, we will likely not be able to continue
operations as they are currently anticipated or at all."

Little concluded, "We remain committed to our merger agreement with
Dinoking Tech, Inc.  We have mailed the proxy statement to
shareholders for their vote on the merger-related proposals at the
special meeting scheduled to be held on October 29, 2015."

A full-text copy of the press release is available at:

                        http://is.gd/NuanfG

                     About Premier Exhibitions

Premier Exhibitions, Inc., develops, deploys and operates
exhibition products that are presented to the public in exhibition
centers, museums and non-traditional venues.  The Atlanta-based
Company's exhibitions generate income primarily through ticket
sales, third-party licensing, sponsorships and merchandise sales.

Premier Exhibitions reported a net loss of $11.7 million on $29.4
million of total revenue for the year ended Feb. 28, 2015, compared
with a net loss of $778,000 on $29.3 million of total revenue for
the year ended Feb. 28, 2014.

                        Bankruptcy Warning

On April 2, 2015 the Company announced that it had entered into a
definitive merger agreement whereby it plans to combine with
Dinoking Tech Inc.  Under the Merger Agreement, the DK shareholders
will be entitled to up to 24% of the fully diluted ownership of the
Company for all of the issued and outstanding shares of DK.  In
addition, an investor group has agreed to provide up to $13.5
million in convertible debt funding to Premier to repay $8 million
of existing debt and $5.5 million for corporate purposes including
the completion of the development of "Saturday Night Live: The
Exhibition" and "Premier Exhibitions 5th Avenue," the Company's
state-of-the-art exhibition and special events center located in
New York City.  To date the investor group has provided $11.5
million of this funding, which was used to retire the debt owed to
Pentwater Capital, to continue funding improvements on the building
at 417 Fifth Avenue, and to complete the Company's Saturday Night
Live Exhibition.  The transaction has been approved by the Board of
Directors of Premier.  Premier's principal shareholder, Sellers
Capital, LLC, and the directors and officers of the Company have
entered into agreements to vote in favor of the transaction.  The
completion of the transaction is subject to Premier shareholder
approval among other customary closing conditions.  The shareholder
meeting to approve the transaction is expected to be held no later
than September 2015.  The merger is expected to be completed in
September 2015.

While the Company recently repaid a loan of $8 million, the Company
will have to repay these amounts to DK if the merger transaction
does not close.  As a result, the Company will have to refinance
the debt or obtain funds to repay the debt in full if that occurs.
The Company could be capital constrained and unable to fulfill the
terms of this and other agreements if its access to capital sources
does not improve in the near term.  Management believes that the
Company's access to capital depends on near-term improvement to its
operating results.

"If the Merger Agreement is not approved, or a public or private
placement of equity securities or of convertible promissory notes,
including potentially to some of the Company's existing
shareholders, is not completed, the Company may have to seek the
protection of the U.S. bankruptcy laws and/or cease operating as a
going concern.  In addition, if the Company does not meet its
payment obligations to third parties as they come due, the Company
may be subject to an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding or other
litigation claims.  Even if the Company were successful in
defending against these potential claims and proceedings, such
claims and proceedings could result in substantial costs and be a
distraction to management, and may result in unfavorable results
that could further adversely impact our financial condition," the
Company said in its annual report for the year ended Feb. 28, 2015.


QUIKSILVER INC: Creditors Balk at Oaktree Financing Proposal
------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Randles at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that unsecured
creditors of Quiksilver Inc. have told a Delaware bankruptcy judge
that the sportswear retailer is seeking to unfairly tilt control of
the company's Chapter 11 to asset management firm Oaktree Capital
Management LP and shunning a better offer from rival firm Brigade
Capital Management LLC.

Quiksilver's unsecured creditors committee filed an objection on
Oct. 9, 2015, to a motion seeking the court's final blessing on a
bankruptcy financing package backed by Oaktree worth up to $175
million.  The committee says Brigade's offer is "superior" and far
more flexible.

                         About Quiksilver

Quiksilver, Inc., designs, produces and distributes branded
apparel, footwear and accessories.  The Company's apparel and
footwear brands, inspired by a passion for outdoor action sports,
represent a casual lifestyle for young-minded people who connect
with its boardriding culture and heritage.  The Company's
Quiksilver, Roxy, and DC brands have authentic roots and heritage
in surf, snow and skate.  The Company's products are sold in more
than 100 countries in a wide range of distribution, including surf
shops, skate shops, snow shops, its proprietary Boardriders shops
and other Company-owned retail stores, other specialty stores,
select department stores and through various e-commerce channels.
For additional information, please visit the Company's brand Web
sites at www.quiksilver.com, www.roxy.com and www.dcshoes.com.

Quiksilver began operations in 1976 as a California company making
boardshorts for surfers in the United States under a license
agreement with the Quiksilver brand founders in Australia. The
Company later reincorporated in Delaware and went public in 1986.

In fiscal year 2014 (ended Oct. 31, 2014), 34% of the Company's
revenue was generated by the Debtors, within the United States.
The remaining 66% is attributable to the Non-Debtor Affiliates
located outside the United States.

Sales at Company retail stores accounted for approximately
28% of Company revenue during fiscal year 2014.  The Company's
retail shops include full-price stores, factory outlet stores, and
"shop-in-shops."  At the end of the fiscal year 2014, the
Company had approximately 266 full-price core brand stores, of
which 75 are located in the United States.

Quiksilver, Inc., and its affiliates filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. D. Del., Case Nos. 15-11880 to 15-11890) on
Sept.
9, 2015. Andrew Bruenjes signed the petition as chief financial
officer.  The Debtors disclosed total assets of $337 million and
total debts of $826 million.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is serving as the
Debtors'
legal advisor, FTI Consulting, Inc. as their restructuring
advisor,
and Peter J. Solomon Company as their investment banker.  Kurtzman
Carson Consultants LLC acts as the Debtors' claims and noticing
agent.


QUIKSILVER INC: Oaktree May Combine Surfwear Retailer w/ Billabong
------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Bathon, writing for Bloomberg News, reported that Oaktree
Capital Management LP may consider combining bankrupt surfwear
retailer Quiksilver Inc. with Billabong International Ltd., a brand
the investment firm already owns a stake in, a judge in Delaware
was told.

According to the report, Durc Savini, an investment banker at Peter
J. Solomon Co., who is working with Quiksilver, testified that "at
some point" Oaktree may put the clothing companies together if it's
able to bring Huntington Beach, California-based Quiksilver out of
bankruptcy under its control.  Savini added that he never directly
approached Oaktree about a transaction with Billabong and that he
doesn't believe Billabong "has the balance sheet to support" such a
deal, the report related.

                         About Quiksilver

Quiksilver, Inc., designs, produces and distributes branded
apparel, footwear and accessories.  The Company's apparel and
footwear brands, inspired by a passion for outdoor action sports,
represent a casual lifestyle for young-minded people who connect
with its boardriding culture and heritage.  The Company's
Quiksilver, Roxy, and DC brands have authentic roots and heritage
in surf, snow and skate.  The Company's products are sold in more
than 100 countries in a wide range of distribution, including surf
shops, skate shops, snow shops, its proprietary Boardriders shops
and other Company-owned retail stores, other specialty stores,
select department stores and through various e-commerce channels.
For additional information, please visit the Company's brand Web
sites at www.quiksilver.com, www.roxy.com and www.dcshoes.com.

Quiksilver began operations in 1976 as a California company making
boardshorts for surfers in the United States under a license
agreement with the Quiksilver brand founders in Australia. The
Company later reincorporated in Delaware and went public in 1986.

In fiscal year 2014 (ended Oct. 31, 2014), 34% of the Company's
revenue was generated by the Debtors, within the United States.
The remaining 66% is attributable to the Non-Debtor Affiliates
located outside the United States.

Sales at Company retail stores accounted for approximately 28% of
Company revenue during fiscal year 2014.  The Company's retail
shops include full-price stores, factory outlet stores, and
"shop-in-shops."  At the end of the fiscal year 2014, the Company
had approximately 266 full-price core brand stores, of which 75
are
located in the United States.

Quiksilver, Inc., and its affiliates filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. D. Del., Case Nos. 15-11880 to 15-11890) on
Sept.
9, 2015. Andrew Bruenjes signed the petition as chief financial
officer.  The Debtors disclosed total assets of $337 million and
total debts of $826 million.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is serving as the
Debtors'
legal advisor, FTI Consulting, Inc. as their restructuring
advisor,
and Peter J. Solomon Company as their investment banker.  Kurtzman
Carson Consultants LLC acts as the Debtors' claims and noticing
agent.

The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 cases of Quiksilver Inc.
and its affiliates appointed seven members to the official
committee of unsecured creditors.

                        *     *     *

Quiksilver, Inc., et al., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware a joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization,
which impairs holders of secured note claims, unsecured note
claims
and general unsecured claims.

Distributions under the Plan and the Reorganized Debtors'
operations post-Effective Date will be funded from: (a) an exit
facility, (b) rights offering, (c) plan sponsor and backstop
parties commitment, and (d) other plan funding.  On the Effective
Date of the Plan, the Reorganized Debtors will enter into an
asset-based revolving credit facility in the principal amount of
up
to [$120.0] million.  Eligible Offerees will have the right to
exercise subscription rights for the purchase of up to $122.5
million of New Quiksilver Common Stock.

A full-text copy of the Plan dated Oct. 13, 2015, is available
at http://bankrupt.com/misc/QSIplan1013.pdf


QUIKSILVER INC: Wins Court Approval of Oaktree Bankruptcy Loan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Quiksilver, Inc. on Oct. 16 disclosed that the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware has approved the full
amount of its $175 million debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing
package provided by affiliates of Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
and Bank of America, N.A. allowing Quiksilver to continue to fund
the Company's ongoing operations in the U.S. and abroad.

Quiksilver also received Bankruptcy Court approval of an additional
$10 million to honor pre-petition claims for Critical Vendors and
will continue to work with the Creditors' Committee on Critical
Vendors among other motions that will help advance the Company's
reorganization.

"We are pleased to have Court approval of the final DIP financing
allowing our reorganization to proceed on track as well as an
additional $10 million to pay pre-petition claims for Critical
Vendors," said Pierre Agnes, Chief Executive Officer of Quiksilver.
"We will continue to work in close cooperation with the Creditors'
Committee to execute our financial and operational restructuring,
which is designed to restore the Company to long-term financial
health.  We look forward to emerging from the Chapter 11 process, a
stronger company better positioned to prosper into the future."

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is serving as the
Company's legal advisor, FTI Consulting, Inc. as its restructuring
advisor, and Peter J. Solomon Company as its investment banker.

Court filings and other documents related to the reorganization
proceedings are available on a separate website administered by the
Company's claims agent, KCC, at http://www.kccllc.net/quicksilver
or www.deb.uscourts.gov the official Bankruptcy Court website.

                           *     *     *

Michael Bathon, writing for Bloomberg News, reported that the
financing and the plan-support agreement put Oaktree in a
commanding position to take over the Huntington Beach,
California-based surfwear retailer by the end of January.  Oaktree
was pushed to improve its terms after unsecured creditors urged a
bankruptcy judge in Wilmington, Delaware, to accept a competing
financing proposal from Brigade Capital Management LP, which they
said was better and would allow Quiksilver to pursue an open sale
process, the report said.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Shannon said on Oct. 15 that the two
proposals "represent a competing vision of how Quiksilver should
restructure," with Brigade pushing for a sale and Oaktree opting
for a balance-sheet restructuring, the report related.  Judge
Shannon said the Oaktree deal still allows Quiksilver "to see if
there is a better deal out there" without risking the restructuring
plan and said he was swayed after Oaktree told him Quiksilver could
still be shopped around throughout the bankruptcy process, the
report further related.

                         About Quiksilver

Quiksilver, Inc., designs, produces and distributes branded
apparel, footwear and accessories.  The Company's apparel and
footwear brands, inspired by a passion for outdoor action sports,
represent a casual lifestyle for young-minded people who connect
with its boardriding culture and heritage.  The Company's
Quiksilver, Roxy, and DC brands have authentic roots and heritage
in surf, snow and skate.  The Company's products are sold in more
than 100 countries in a wide range of distribution, including surf
shops, skate shops, snow shops, its proprietary Boardriders shops
and other Company-owned retail stores, other specialty stores,
select department stores and through various e-commerce channels.
For additional information, please visit the Company's brand Web
sites at www.quiksilver.com, www.roxy.com and www.dcshoes.com.

Quiksilver began operations in 1976 as a California company making
boardshorts for surfers in the United States under a license
agreement with the Quiksilver brand founders in Australia. The
Company later reincorporated in Delaware and went public in 1986.

In fiscal year 2014 (ended Oct. 31, 2014), 34% of the Company's
revenue was generated by the Debtors, within the United States.
The remaining 66% is attributable to the Non-Debtor Affiliates
located outside the United States.

Sales at Company retail stores accounted for approximately 28% of
Company revenue during fiscal year 2014.  The Company's retail
shops include full-price stores, factory outlet stores, and
"shop-in-shops."  At the end of the fiscal year 2014, the Company
had approximately 266 full-price core brand stores, of which 75
are
located in the United States.

Quiksilver, Inc., and its affiliates filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. D. Del., Case Nos. 15-11880 to 15-11890) on
Sept.
9, 2015. Andrew Bruenjes signed the petition as chief financial
officer.  The Debtors disclosed total assets of $337 million and
total debts of $826 million.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is serving as the
Debtors'
legal advisor, FTI Consulting, Inc. as their restructuring
advisor,
and Peter J. Solomon Company as their investment banker.  Kurtzman
Carson Consultants LLC acts as the Debtors' claims and noticing
agent.

The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 cases of Quiksilver Inc.
and its affiliates appointed seven members to the official
committee of unsecured creditors.

                        *     *     *

Quiksilver, Inc., et al., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware a joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization,
which impairs holders of secured note claims, unsecured note
claims
and general unsecured claims.

Distributions under the Plan and the Reorganized Debtors'
operations post-Effective Date will be funded from: (a) an exit
facility, (b) rights offering, (c) plan sponsor and backstop
parties commitment, and (d) other plan funding.  On the Effective
Date of the Plan, the Reorganized Debtors will enter into an
asset-based revolving credit facility in the principal amount of
up
to [$120.0] million.  Eligible Offerees will have the right to
exercise subscription rights for the purchase of up to $122.5
million of New Quiksilver Common Stock.

A full-text copy of the Plan dated Oct. 13, 2015, is available
at http://bankrupt.com/misc/QSIplan1013.pdf



RADIOSHACK CORP: Judge Denies Challenge of $100M IRS Claim
----------------------------------------------------------
Vidya Kauri at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that a Delaware
bankruptcy judge on Oct. 14, 2015, denied RadioShack Corporation's
request to determine its liability to the Internal Revenue Service
for a tax claim potentially in excess of $100 million, saying that
the federal agency is not required to recognize a revised
accounting method proposed by RadioShack.

In a 2-page order denying RadioShack Corp.'s motion to determine
the validity of the tax claim, Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan
L. Shannon reiterated his reasoning that had previously been made
during a Sept. 11 hearing.

                 About RadioShack Corporation

Headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas, RadioShack is a retailer of
mobile technology products and services, as well as products
related to personal and home technology and power supply needs.
RadioShack's retail network includes more than 4,300
company-operated stores in the United States, 270 company-operated
stores in Mexico, and approximately 1,000 dealer and other outlets
worldwide.

RadioShack Corp. and affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-10197) on Feb. 5, 2015,
disclosing
total assets of $1.2 billion, versus total debt of $1.3 billion.

David G. Heiman, Esq., Greg M. Gordon, Esq., Amanda M. Suzuki,
Esq., Jonathan M. Fisher, Esq., Thomas A. Howley, Esq., and Paul
M.
Green, Esq., at Jones Day serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy
counsel.
David M. Fournier, Esq., Evelyn J. Meltzer, Esq., and John H.
Schanne, II, Esq., at Pepper Hamilton LLP serve as co-counsel.
Carlin Adrianopoli at FTI Consulting, Inc. is the Debtors'
restructuring advisor.  Maeva Group, LLC, is the Debtors'
turnaround advisor. Lazard Freres & Co. LLC is the Debtors'
investment banker.  A&G Realty Partners is the Debtors' real
estate
advisor.  Prime Clerk is the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors tapped Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and Cooley LLP as co-counsel, and
Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc., as financial advisor and investment banker.  

                           *     *     *

After an auction in March 2015, the Debtors sold most of the
assets
to General Wireless, Inc., an entity formed by Standard General,
L.P., for $150 million.  The Debtors also sold Mexican assets to
Office Depot de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., for $31.8 million plus the
assumption of debt.  Regal Forest Holding Co. Ltd. bought the
Debtors' intellectual property assets in Latin America for a
purchase price of $5,000,000.

In June 2015, the Debtors changed their name to RS Legacy
Corporation, et al., following the sale of the Company's brand
name
and customer data to General Wireless.

The bankruptcy judge on Sept. 30, 2015, agreed to confirm the
RadioShack Corp. estate's liquidating plan.  The centerpiece of
The
Plan is the resolution of various disputes among the Debtors, the
Creditors' Committee and the SCP Secured Parties.


RELATIVITY MEDIA: Television Buyers Want to Retain CEO, Employees
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Randles at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that a trio of hedge
funds in line to acquire Relativity Media LLC's television
production business said on Oct. 12, 2015, in New York that Chief
Executive Officer Tom Forman and other employees are expected to
remain in place after the $125 million sale closes later this
month.

Attorneys representing the funds and other Relativity lenders filed
court papers responding to objections that have been lodged that
are related to the sale.  The funds included Luxor Capital Group LP
and Anchorage Capital Group LLC.

                      About Relativity

Relativity -- http://relativitymedia.com/-- is a next-generation  

global media company engaged in multiple aspects of content
production and distribution, including movies, television, sports,
digital and music.  More than just a collection of
entertainment-related businesses, Relativity is a content engine
with the ability to leverage each of these business units,
independently and together, to create content across all mediums,
giving consumers what they want, when they want it.

Relativity Studios, the Company's largest division, has produced,
distributed or structured financing for more than 200 motion
pictures, generating more than $17 billion in worldwide box-office
revenue and earning 60 Oscar nominations.  Relativity's films
include Oculus, Safe Haven, Act of Valor, Immortals, Limitless,
and The Fighter.

Relativity Media LLC and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on July 30, 2015 (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y., Case No. 15-11989).  The case is assigned to Judge
Michael E. Wiles.

The Debtors are represented by Craig A. Wolfe, Esq., Malani J.
Cademartori, Esq., and Blanka K. Wolfe, Esq., at Sheppard Mullin
Richter & Hampton LLP, in New York; and Richard L. Wynne, Esq.,
Bennett L. Spiegel, Esq., and Lori Sinanyan, Esq., at Jones Day,
in New York.

Brian Kushner of FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as chief
restructuring officer and crisis and turnaround manager.  Luke
Schaeffer of FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as deputy CRO.

Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P. serves as the Debtors'
investment banker.  The team is led by Timothy Coleman, Senior
Managing Director, CJ Brown, Senior Managing Director, Paul
Sheaffer, Vice President, and Joseph Goldschmid, Associate.

The Debtors' noticing and claims agent is Donlin, Recano &
Company, Inc.


REVEL AG: Says Utility Blocks Securing New Source of Heat
---------------------------------------------------------
Jeannie O'Sullivan at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that the energy
company refusing to supply power to Revel Hotel Casino is now
undermining efforts to secure a new source of heat critical to
preventing building damage and keeping the shuttered venue's
planned relaunch on track, the property's new owner told a New
Jersey federal judge on Oct. 10, 2015.

                          About Revel AC

Revel AC, Inc. -- http://www.revelresorts.com/-- owns and operates
Revel, a Las Vegas-style, beachfront entertainment resort and
casino located on the Boardwalk in the south inlet of Atlantic
City, New Jersey.  Revel AC Inc. and five of its affiliates sought
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case No. 14-22654) on
June 19, 2014, to pursue a quick sale of the assets.  The Chapter
11 cases of Revel AC LLC and its debtor-affiliates are transferred
to Judge Michael B. Kaplan.  The Debtors' cases was originally
assigned to Judge Gloria M. Burns.  The Debtors' Chapter 11 cases
are jointly consolidated for procedural purposes.  Revel AC
estimated assets ranging from $500 million to $1 billion, and the
same amount of liabilities.

White & Case, LLP, and Fox Rothschild, LLP, serve as the Debtors'
Counsel, and Moelis & Company, LLC, is the investment banker.  The
Debtors' solicitation and claims agent is Alixpartners, LLP.

The prepetition first lenders are represented by Cadwalader,
Wickersham & Taft LLP.  The prepetition second lien lenders are
represented by Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.  The
DIP agent is represented by Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP.

This is Revel AC's second trip to bankruptcy.  The company first
sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case No.
13-16253) on March 25, 2013, with a prepackaged plan that reduced
debt by $1.25 billion.  Less than two months later on May 15, 2013,
the 2013 Plan was confirmed and became effective on May 21, 2013.

                        *     *     *

Revel AC, Inc., et al., on April 20, 2015, filed an amended plan
of reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement to
incorporate the terms of a settlement and plan support agreement
entered into with the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors,
and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as DIP Agent, and Wells Fargo Principal
Lending, LLC, as a Prepetition First Lien Lender and DIP Lender.
The Settlement Agreement, among other things, provides that Wells
Fargo agrees to give the general unsecured creditors $1.60 million
of its recovery from the proceeds of the sale of substantially all
of the Debtors' assets to Polo North Country Club, Inc., and to
advance $150,000 from its recovery to fund the Debtors'
reconciliation of claims and prosecution of claims or estate causes
of actions.

Early in April 2015, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Gloria Burns approved
an $82 million sale of the Revel Casino Hotel to Polo North Country
Club, Inc., which is owned by Florida developer Glenn Straub,
ending nearly 10 months of contentious legal combat for control of
the Atlantic City, N.J., resort.



RG STEEL: Judge Approves Structured Settlement of Claims
--------------------------------------------------------
A federal judge on Oct. 15 approved a structured settlement of
claims in RG Steel's Chapter 11 bankruptcy case that gives
USW-related entities about 70 percent of the $17.4 million total to
be distributed to creditors.

The United Steelworkers (USW) joined a multi-party mediation
process last year in an effort to recover as much as possible for
workers and retirees who were affected by the company's May 2012
bankruptcy filing.

"The USW did a good job in making the best of a bad situation. It's
sad that it had to come to this, and unfortunate that this has
affected so many hard-working people," said David Boyd, a USW Local
9477 retiree who was employed at Sparrows Point, Md.  "But the
union never gave up and kept fighting for what was right all the
way to the very end."

The USW's share of the settlement comes to about $12 million, a sum
that includes about $6.3 million in vacation and severance payments
owed to about 4,000 workers at former RG Steel mills in Sparrows
Point, Md., Warren, Ohio, and Wheeling, W.Va,, and at a coke-making
facility in Follansbee, W.Va.

The settlement also includes payments of $2.4 million to a
voluntary employee beneficiary association (VEBA) for workers at
the Warren mill; $990,790 to the Steelworkers Health & Welfare Fund
to cover more than $6 million in claims; more than $814,000 to the
Steelworkers Pension Trust; $445,590.31 to a VEBA for workers at
Wheeling-Pitt, a predecessor to RG Steel; $480,000 to cover unpaid
medical claims; and about $54,000 in severance for workers at an
Allenport, Pa., mill that closed in 2008.

"This settlement doesn't make up for the fact that so many people
have suffered," Mr. Boyd said.  "But if we hadn't had the union
fighting for us, we could have ended up with nothing."

The USW is the largest industrial union in North America,
representing workers in a range of industries including metals,
mining, rubber, paper and forestry, oil refining, health care,
security, hotels, and municipal governments and agencies.

                         *     *     *

Patrick Fitzgerald, writing for Dow Jones' Daily Bankruptcy Review,
reported the settlement involving RG Steel LLC, Cerberus Capital
Management LP and billionaire Ira Rennert's Renco Group Inc. means
some money for thousands of laid-off steelworkers and a negotiated
end to the long-running bankruptcy of the failed steelmaker.

According to the report, Judge Kevin J. Carey of the U.S.
Bankruptcy court in Wilmington, Del., on Oct. 15 signed off a
so-called structured dismissal that was endorsed by RG Steel's
official creditors committee, the United Steelworkers and union
pension funds.

As previously reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, citing
DBR, instead of filing a Chapter 11 plan, the
defunct company will pull the plug on its aging bankruptcy case
after getting a judge to sign off on the settlement in a so-called
structured dismissal endorsed by RG Steel's official creditors
committee, the United Steelworkers and union pension funds.

                         About RG Steel

RG Steel LLC -- http://www.rg-steel.com/-- is the United States'  

fourth-largest flat-rolled steel producer with annual steelmaking
capacity of 7.5 million tons.  It was formed in March 2011
following the purchase of three steel facilities located in
Sparrows Point, Maryland; Wheeling, West Virginia and Warren,
Ohio, from entities related to Severstal US Holdings LLC.  RG
Steel also owns finishing facilities in Yorkville and Martins
Ferry, Ohio.  It also owned Wheeling Corrugating Company and has a
50% ownership in Mountain State Carbon and Ohio Coatings Company.

RG Steel along with affiliates, including WP Steel Venture LLC,
sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 12-
11661) on May 31, 2012.  Bankruptcy was precipitated by liquidity
shortfall and a dispute with Mountain State Carbon, LLC, and a
Severstal affiliate, that restricted the shipment of coke used in
the steel production process.

The Debtors estimated assets and debts in excess of $1 billion.  As
of the bankruptcy filing, the Debtors owe (i) $440 million,
including $16.9 million in outstanding letters of credit, to senior
lenders led by Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as administrative
agent, (ii) $218.7 million to junior lenders, led by Cerberus
Business Finance, LLC, as agent, (iii) $130.5 million on account of
a subordinated promissory note issued by majority owner The Renco
Group, Inc., and (iv) $100 million on a secured promissory note
issued by Severstal.

Judge Kevin J. Carey presides over the case.

The Debtors are represented in the case by Robert J. Dehney, Esq.,
and Erin R. Fay, Esq., at Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, and
Matthew A. Feldman, Esq., Shaunna D. Jones, Esq., Weston T. Eguchi,
Esq., at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, represent the Debtors.
Conway MacKenzie, Inc., serves as the Debtors' financial advisor
and The Seaport Group serves as lead investment banker.  Donald
MacKenzie of Conway MacKenzie, Inc., as CRO.  Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC is the claims and notice agent.

Wells Fargo Capital Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, is
represented by Jonathan N. Helfat, Esq., and Daniel F. Fiorillo,
Esq., at Otterbourg, Steindler, Houston & Rosen, P.C.; and Laura
Davis Jones, Esq., and Timothy P. Cairns, Esq., at Pachuiski Stang
Ziehi & Jones LLP.

Renco Group is represented by lawyers at Cadwalader, Wickersham &
Taft LLP.

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP represents the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  Huron Consulting Services LLC
serves as the Committee's financial advisor.

The Debtor has sold off the principal plants.  The sale of the
Wheeling Corrugating division to Nucor Corp. brought in $7 million.
That plant in Sparrows Point, Maryland, fetched the highest price,
$72.5 million.  CJ Betters Enterprises Inc. paid $16 million for
the Ohio plant.  RG Steel Sparrows Point LLC has received the green
light to sell some of its assets to Siemens Industry, Inc., which
include equipment and related spare parts, for $400,000.



ROSETTA GENOMICS: Expects to File Q2 Form 10-Q by Oct. 28
---------------------------------------------------------
As previously reported, due to complications associated with the
accounting treatment regarding its acquisition of CynoGen, Inc.
(d/b/a PersonalizeDx) in April 2015, Rosetta Genomics Ltd.
announced that there will be a delay in filing its financial
statements for the six months ended June 30, 2015.  

"The Company is working to facilitate the completion and submission
of its financial statements, and expects to do so on or before
October 28, 2015 and expects to report unaudited pro forma revenue
for the six months ended June 30, 2015 of approximately $4.0
million at that time," according to a regulatory filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                          About Rosetta

Based in Rehovot, Israel, Rosetta Genomics Ltd. is seeking to
develop and commercialize new diagnostic tests based on a recently
discovered group of genes known as microRNAs.  MicroRNAs are
naturally expressed, or produced, using instructions encoded in
DNA and are believed to play an important role in normal function
and in various pathologies.  The Company has established a CLIA-
certified laboratory in Philadelphia, which enables the Company to
develop, validate and commercialize its own diagnostic tests
applying its microRNA technology.

Rosetta Genomics reported a loss from continuing operations of
$14.5 million on $1.32 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, a
loss from continuing operations of $13.2 million in 2013 and a loss
from continuing operations of $10.69 million in 2012.

As of Dec. 31, 2014, the Company had $17.3 million in total assets,
$2.21 million in total liabilities and $15.06 million in total
shareholders' equity.

                        Bankruptcy Warning

"We will likely require substantial additional funding and expect
to augment our cash balance through financing transactions,
including the issuance of debt or equity securities and further
strategic collaborations.  On December 7, 2012, we filed a shelf
registration statement on Form F-3 with the SEC for the issuance of
ordinary shares, various series of debt securities and/or warrants
to purchase any of such securities, either individually or in
units, with a total value of up to $75 million, from time to time
at prices and on terms to be determined at the time of such
offerings.  The filing was declared effective on December 19, 2012.
As of the time of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 20-F,
we had sold through the Cantor Sales Agreement an aggregate of
4,736,854 of our ordinary shares for gross proceeds of $19.9
million under this shelf registration statement, leaving an
aggregate of approximately $55.1 million of securities available
for sale under this Form F-3, subject to limitations imposed by the
SEC for companies with a public float of less than $75 million.  If
we need additional funding, there can be no assurance that we will
be able to obtain adequate levels of additional funding on
favorable terms, if at all.  If adequate funds are needed and not
available, we may be required to:

   * delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate certain research and
     development programs;

   * obtain funds through arrangements with collaborators or
     others on terms unfavorable to us or that may require us to
     relinquish rights to certain technologies or products that we
     might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize
     independently;

   * monetize certain of our assets;

   * pursue merger or acquisition strategies; or

   * seek protection under the bankruptcy laws of Israel and the
     United States," the Company said in its annual report for the
     year ended Dec. 31, 2014.


ROSETTA GENOMICS: Raises $8 Million From Private Placement
----------------------------------------------------------
Rosetta Genomics Ltd. has entered into definitive agreements with
investors to purchase an aggregate of $8,000,000 in units,
consisting of ordinary shares and warrants, in a private placement.
The closing is expected to occur on or about Oct. 16, 2015, and is
subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.

Under the terms of the private placement, Rosetta will sell an
aggregate of 3,333,333 units at $2.40 per unit, with each unit
consisting of (i) one ordinary share, (ii) a Series A Warrant to
purchase one-half of an ordinary share at an exercise price of
$2.75 per ordinary share (subject to adjustment), exercisable for a
period of five years from the closing date, and (iii) a partially
pre-funded Series B Warrant.  The Series B Warrants have an
exercise price of NIS 0.6 (which has been prepaid) plus $0.0001 per
share.  The Series B Warrants are intended to reset the price of
the units, and will be exercisable for an aggregate number of
ordinary shares based on a reset price per unit equal to 85% of the
arithmetic average of the five lowest weighted average prices
calculated during the ten trading days following the effective date
of the Company's resale registration statement to be filed for the
private placement; provided that the maximum aggregate number of
ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the Series B Warrants
will not exceed 2,666,667.  The Series B Warrants are exercisable
for 60 days following the effective date of the resale registration
statement.  Rosetta is required to file a resale registration
statement within 60 days following the closing of the private
placement that covers the resale by the purchasers of the ordinary
shares and the ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the
warrants issued in the private placement.

Aegis Capital Corp. acted as the exclusive placement agent in
connection with the private placement.

The securities offered and sold in the private placement have not
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
any state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold in the
United States absent registration, or an applicable exemption from
registration under the Securities Act and applicable state
securities laws.

This announcement is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of
an offer to buy any securities of Rosetta.

                           About Rosetta

Based in Rehovot, Israel, Rosetta Genomics Ltd. is seeking to
develop and commercialize new diagnostic tests based on a recently
discovered group of genes known as microRNAs.  MicroRNAs are
naturally expressed, or produced, using instructions encoded in
DNA and are believed to play an important role in normal function
and in various pathologies.  The Company has established a CLIA-
certified laboratory in Philadelphia, which enables the Company to
develop, validate and commercialize its own diagnostic tests
applying its microRNA technology.

Rosetta Genomics reported a loss from continuing operations of
$14.5 million on $1.32 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, a
loss from continuing operations of $13.2 million in 2013 and a loss
from continuing operations of $10.69 million in 2012.

As of Dec. 31, 2014, the Company had $17.3 million in total assets,
$2.21 million in total liabilities and $15.06 million in total
shareholders' equity.

                        Bankruptcy Warning

"We will likely require substantial additional funding and expect
to augment our cash balance through financing transactions,
including the issuance of debt or equity securities and further
strategic collaborations.  On December 7, 2012, we filed a shelf
registration statement on Form F-3 with the SEC for the issuance of
ordinary shares, various series of debt securities and/or warrants
to purchase any of such securities, either individually or in
units, with a total value of up to $75 million, from time to time
at prices and on terms to be determined at the time of such
offerings.  The filing was declared effective on December 19, 2012.
As of the time of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 20-F,
we had sold through the Cantor Sales Agreement an aggregate of
4,736,854 of our ordinary shares for gross proceeds of $19.9
million under this shelf registration statement, leaving an
aggregate of approximately $55.1 million of securities available
for sale under this Form F-3, subject to limitations imposed by the
SEC for companies with a public float of less than $75 million.  If
we need additional funding, there can be no assurance that we will
be able to obtain adequate levels of additional funding on
favorable terms, if at all.  If adequate funds are needed and not
available, we may be required to:

   * delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate certain research and
     development programs;

   * obtain funds through arrangements with collaborators or
     others on terms unfavorable to us or that may require us to
     relinquish rights to certain technologies or products that we
     might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize
     independently;

   * monetize certain of our assets;

   * pursue merger or acquisition strategies; or

   * seek protection under the bankruptcy laws of Israel and the
     United States," the Company said in its annual report for the
     year ended Dec. 31, 2014.


SANMINA CORP: S&P Affirms 'BB' CCR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's affirmed its 'BB' corporate credit rating on San
Jose, Calif.-based Sanmina Corp.  The outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB+' issue-level rating on the
company's senior secured notes.  The recovery rating remains '2',
indicating S&P's expectation of substantial recovery (70% to 90%,
in the upper half of the range) in the event of a payment default.

"The rating reflects our view of Sanmina's highly competitive and
cyclical industry conditions, meaningful client concentration, and
modest scale compared with larger electronics manufacturing
services (EMS) competitors, partly offset by its focus on
higher-margin, low-volume market segments and minimal exposure to
more volatile consumer end markets," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst Christian Frank.

The stable outlook incorporates S&P's view that the diversity of
Sanmina's end markets will allow it to deliver consistent operating
performance, and that it will conduct its acquisition and
shareholder return activities such that credit metrics remain
consistent with the rating.

S&P revised the downside and upside scenarios of its outlook
statement for Sanmina.

S&P could lower the rating if material operating performance
deterioration or the company's adoption of more aggressive
financial policies result in leverage sustained in the 3x area or
higher, or free operating cash flow (FOCF) to debt sustained below
15%.

Although not likely over the next 12 months, S&P could raise the
rating if it come to believe that Sanmina can sustain leverage
below 1.5x and FOCF to debt above 40% through a business cycle
while pursuing its acquisition and shareholder return objectives,
and if it delivers consistent revenue and EBITDA growth.



SANUWAVE HEALTH: Kevin Richardson Reports 13.9% Stake as of Sept. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Kevin A. Richardson, II disclosed that as of Sept. 2,
2015, he beneficially owns 8,774,996 shares of common stock of
SANUWAVE Health, Inc. representing 13.9 percent of the shares
outstanding.  Prides Capital Partners, L.L.C. also reported
beneficial ownership of 6,467,733 common shares as of that date.  A
copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                       http://is.gd/kKZ9Ce

                       About SANUWAVE Health

Alpharetta, Ga.-based SANUWAVE Health, Inc., is an emerging global
regenerative medicine company focused on the development and
commercialization of noninvasive, biological response activating
devices for the repair and regeneration of tissue, musculoskeletal
and vascular structures.

SANUWAVE Health reported a net loss of $5.97 million on $847,000 of
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared with a net loss
of $11.3 million on $800,000 of revenues in 2013.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $2.55 million in total assets,
$6.75 million in total liabilities and total stockholders' deficit
of $4.19 million.

                       Bankruptcy Warning

"The continuation of the Company's business is dependent upon
raising additional capital during the third or early fourth quarter
of 2015 to fund operations.  Management's plans are to obtain
additional capital through investments by strategic partners for
market opportunities, which may include strategic partnerships or
licensing arrangements, or raise capital through the issuance of
common or preferred stock, securities convertible into common
stock, or secured or unsecured debt.  These possibilities, to the
extent available, may be on terms that result in significant
dilution to the Company's existing shareholders.  Although no
assurances can be given, management of the Company believes that
potential additional issuances of equity or other potential
financing transactions as discussed above should provide the
necessary funding for the Company to continue as a going concern.
If these efforts are unsuccessful, the Company may be forced to
seek relief through a filing under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code," the
Company said in its quarterly report for the period ended June 30,
2015.


SOUTHCROSS ENERGY: S&P Lowers CCR to 'B-', Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said it lowered its corporate
credit and senior secured rating on Southcross Energy Partners
L.P.'s to 'B-' from 'B'.  The outlook is stable.

The '3' recovery rating on the company's senior secured term loan
and revolving credit facility is unchanged.  S&P's expectations
reflect "meaningful" (50% to 70%; upper half of the range) recovery
if a payment default occurs.

At the same time, S&P revised the rating outlook on Southcross
Holdings Borrower L.P. (Holdings) to negative from stable and
affirmed the 'B-' corporate credit and senior secured rating on the
partnership.

S&P also revised the recovery rating to '4' from '3', reflecting
its expectation of "average" (30% to 50%; lower half of the range)
recovery if a default occurs.

The downgrade on Southcross reflects S&P's expectation that the
partnership will have adjusted debt leverage above 5x for the next
12 to 18 months.  S&P projects adjusted debt leverage of more than
6x in 2015 and 5.5x in 2016, before improving to the 4.5x to 5x
range by 2017.

"In addition, we believe the partnership's liquidity could continue
to be pressured due to covenant constraints," said Standard &
Poor's credit analyst Mike Llanos.

S&P also revised its view on Holdings and no longer apply the
Master Limited Partnerships And General Partnerships criteria
(published Sept. 22, 2014), but rather rate Holdings on a
stand-alone basis.  S&P changed its view on Holdings because S&P
believes in the near term it will rely more heavily on EBITDA from
its assets rather than distributions from the partnership to
satisfy its financial obligations.  Furthermore, limited liquidity
at the partnership, an elevated cost of capital, and challenging
capital markets access raise some uncertainty as to when Holdings'
assets could be completely dropped down into the partnership.

The stable outlook on Southcross reflects S&P's expectation that
the partnership will rely on sponsors' equity to maintain
sufficient liquidity and fund capital spending and other growth
initiatives through 2016.

The negative outlook on Holdings reflects S&P's expectation that
liquidity could continue to be pressured due to weak commodity
prices and limited cash flow from its wholly owned assets.



SOUTHLAND BAKING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Southland Baking Co., Inc.
        P.O. Box 1328
        Tomball, TX 77377

Case No.: 15-35473

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 15, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Judge: Hon. David R Jones

Debtor's Counsel: Peter Johnson, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF PETER JOHNSON
                  Eleven Greenway Plaza, Suite 2820
                  Houston, TX 77046
                  Tel: 713-961-1200
                  Email: pjohnson@pjlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Ricky V. Clark, president.

A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb15-35473.pdf


TAYLOR-WHARTON INT'L: Gets Interim OK to Tap $14M DIP Financing
---------------------------------------------------------------
Matt Chiappardi at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that a Delaware
bankruptcy judge on Oct. 13, 2015, gave cryogenics company
Taylor-Wharton International LLC the interim OK to tap more than
$10 million of an up to $13.8 million stopgap financing package to
help fund a case the centuries-old company hopes will spur keen
market interest for a sale.

During a hearing in Wilmington, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan L.
Shannon gave interim approval for a debtor-in-possession financing
package administered by prepetition lender Antares Capital LP that
allows Taylor-Wharton access to $10.8 million of the up to $13.8
million facility.

                       About Taylor-Wharton

Taylor-Wharton International LLC and Taylor-Wharton Cryogenics LLC
filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Proposed Lead
Case No. 15-12075) on Oct. 7, 2015.  The petition was signed by
Thomas Doherty as chief restructuring officer.

Cryogenics is a leading designer, engineer and manufacturer of
cryogenic equipment designed to transport and store liquefied
atmospheric and hydrocarbon gases.  Cryogenics has a single United
States operation in Theodore, Alabama.  Cryogenics is the direct
or indirect parent of several foreign non-debtor subsidiaries
which
have manufacturing operations in China, Malaysia, Slovakia, and
warehousing operations in Germany and Australia.

The Debtors have engaged Reed Smith LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel, Argus Management Corporation as interim management
services provider, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and
Miller Buckfire & Company LLC as investment banker and Logan &
Company, Inc., as noticing and claims agent.

The Debtors estimated both assets and liabilities of $100 million
to $500 million.  O'Neal Steel Inc. is listed as the largest
unsecured creditor holding a trade claim of $788,815.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon is assigned to the case.


TECHPRECISION CORP: Chief Financial Officer Quits
-------------------------------------------------
Richard Fitzgerald notified TechPrecision Corporation of his
resignation as chief financial officer of the Company, effective
Oct. 23, 2015.  Mr. Fitzgerald tendered his resignation in order to
accept a new position and not due to any disagreement with the
Company, according to a regulatory filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Mr. Fitzgerald will continue to be employed by the Company through
Oct. 23, 2015, to ensure an orderly transition.  Mr. Fitzgerald
joined the Company in March 2009 as chief financial officer.  The
Company's Board of Directors and management are developing a
transition plan relative to the finance function and chief
financial officer position and intend to adopt and announce the
Company's transition plan in the near term.

                         About TechPrecision

TechPrecision Corporation (OTC BB: TPCSE), through its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Ranor, Inc., and Wuxi Critical Mechanical Components
Co., Ltd., globally manufactures large-scale, metal fabricated and
machined precision components and equipment.

TechPrecision reported a net loss of $3.58 million for the year
ended March 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $7.09 million for
the year ended March 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $10.97 million in total
assets, $10.46 million in total liabilities and $509,261 in total
stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2015, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations, and the Company's liquidity may
not be sufficient to meet its debt service requirements as they
come due over the next twelve months.  These circumstances raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


TRANS-LUX CORP: Creates New "Series B Convertible Preferred Stock"
------------------------------------------------------------------
Trans-Lux Corporation filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware a Certificate of Designations of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock creating a new series of preferred
stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share, designated as
"Series B Convertible Preferred Stock".  A copy of the Certificate
of Designations is available at http://is.gd/qM4xkC

                    About Trans-Lux Corporation

Norwalk, Conn.-based Trans-Lux Corporation (NYSE Amex: TLX) is a
designer and manufacturer of digital signage display solutions for
the financial, sports and entertainment, gaming and leasing
markets.

Trans-Lux Corporation incurred a net loss of $4.62 million on $24.4
million of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014,
compared with a net loss of $1.86 million on $20.9 million of total
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2013.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $15 million in total assets,
$18.3 million in total liabilities and a $3.2 million total
stockholders' deficit.

BDO USA, LLP, issued a "going concern" qualification on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014,
citing that the Company has suffered recurring losses from
operations and has a significant working capital deficiency that
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.  Further, the auditors said, the Company is in default of
the indenture agreements governing its outstanding 9-1/2%
Subordinated debentures which were due in 2012 and its 8-1/4%
Limited convertible senior subordinated notes which were due in
2012 so that the trustees or holders of 25% of the outstanding
Debentures and Notes have the right to demand payment immediately.
Additionally, the Company has a significant amount due to their
pension plan over the next 12 months.


TRI STATE TRUCKING: Seeks Approval of $2-Mil. DIP Financing
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tri State Trucking Company seeks authorization from the Bankruptcy
Court to obtain secured post-petition factoring of up to $2,000,000
from Citizens & Northern Bank through the DIP Factoring Agreement.
The Company said proceeds of the DIP Facility will be used to pay
its ongoing operating expenses, pay its creditors and eventually
propose a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization capable of
confirmation.

Prior to the Petition Date, C&N and the Debtor engaged in a
factoring relationship wherein the Debtor offered and C&N purchased
the Debtor's accounts receivable under a factoring, security and
services agreement.  The Debtor and C&N propose to continue their
pre-petition relationship and enter into a similar factoring,
security and services agreement post-petition.

The term of the Factoring Agreement is 12 months from the date of
execution with automatic renewal provisions should the Debtor not
provide written notice of termination.

Pursuant to the Factoring Agreement, the Debtor will be obligated
to repurchase any Receivable purchased by C&N that remains
outstanding more than 120 days from the date of the invoice.  The
Repurchase Obligation will be equal to the Face Amount of the
Receivable, plus attorney's fees (if incurred) and accrued and
unpaid finance charges related to such Receivable.

Any claim under the Post-Petition Financing will be secured by a
perfected first priority lien on and security interest in all
existing and after acquired C&N Collateral, including the Cash
Collateral.

                     About Tri State Trucking

Tri State Trucking Company filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 15-04444) on Oct. 13, 2015.  William E.
Robinson signed the petition as president.  The Debtor estimated
assets in the range of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities
of at least $1 million.  Mette, Evans, & Woodside represents the
Debtor as counsel.  Judge John J Thomas is assigned to the case.

Tri State operates an over the road logistics company hauling
various freight of its customers.  The Debtor employs approximately
50 people and operates from its headquarters located at 16064 Route
6, Mansfield, Pennsylvania 16933.


VALITAS HEALTH: Moody's Cuts Corporate Family Rating to Caa3
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Valitas Health Services,
Inc.'s Corporate Family Rating to Caa3 from Caa1, its Probability
of Default Rating to Caa3-PD from Caa1-PD, and its senior secured
bank credit facility ratings to Caa2 from B3. The rating outlook
remains negative.

The rating action reflects Moody's concerns regarding the company's
weak liquidity profile, including minimal cushion under the
company's financial covenants due to earnings volatility and
approaching step-downs. As a result, Moody's expects that a waiver
or an amendment will be required over the near-term. The company's
weak liquidity profile also reflects approaching debt maturities,
including the company's revolver expiration in June 2016 and term
loan maturing in June 2017. The downgrade also reflects uncertainty
related to the company's Florida contract, the company's largest
customer, as the state announced its plan to place its healthcare
services contract up for re-bid by the end of 2015.

Following is a summary of Moody's rating actions:

Ratings downgraded:

Valitas Health Services, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating to Caa3 from Caa1

  Probability of Default Rating to Caa3-PD from Caa1-PD

  Senior secured first lien credit facilities, to Caa2 (LGD 3) from
B3 (LGD 3)

The rating outlook is negative.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Valitas' Caa3 Corporate Family Rating reflects the company's high
financial leverage, limited earnings visibility due to risks
associated with the volatility of contracts, and margin compression
due to competitive pricing pressure on renewed contracts. The
credit profile is also constrained by the company's limited free
cash flow generation, considerable earnings concentration among top
customers, and weak liquidity profile due to minimal covenant
cushion and approaching debt maturities. The ratings are supported
by Valitas' solid scale and market position as the largest provider
of healthcare services to correctional facilities in a highly
fragmented sector, and enhanced focus on operational efficiencies
which we expect will support earnings and cash flow over the next
12 to 18 months.

The negative rating outlook reflects our expectation that credit
metrics will remain weak due to the challenging competitive
environment, uncertainties related to the company's largest
contract, and a weak liquidity profile with approaching debt
maturities. In addition, we believe that Valitas will need to
obtain a waiver or amendment to its credit agreement over the
near-term if the company is unable to remain in compliance with
financial covenants.

The ratings could be upgraded if the company significantly improves
its liquidity profile, including greater certainty regarding the
company's ability to comply with financial covenants and an
extension of near-term debt maturities. An upgrade would also
require adjusted debt to EBITDA sustained below 7 times. In
addition, an upgrade would require greater clarity around the
status of the company's Florida contract.

The ratings could be downgraded if operating performance
deteriorates, or if it appears likely that the company will breach
a covenant and be unable to obtain a waiver, or if its liquidity
for any other reason weakens. The ratings could also be downgraded
if the company experiences a loss of key DOC contract.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published December 2014. Please see the
Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this
methodology.

Headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, Valitas Health Services,
Inc., ("Valitas") through its primary operating subsidiary, Corizon
Health, Inc. ("Corizon"), is a leading provider of contract
healthcare services to correctional facilities owned or operated by
state and local governments in United States. Valitas is majority
owned by Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company, a Chicago based private
equity management firm. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2015,
Valitas generated revenue of approximately $1.4 billion.



VISANT HOLDING: S&P Puts 'B' CCR on CreditWatch Developing
----------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said that it placed its ratings
on Visant Holding Corp., including the 'B' corporate credit rating,
on CreditWatch with developing implications.

The CreditWatch placement follows Visant's announcement that it has
entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by Jarden Corp.
for about $1.5 billion.  Jarden announced that it expects the
transition to close in the fourth quarter of 2015.  S&P expects
that the transaction will be financed with a mix of debt, equity,
and cash on hand (consistent with Jarden's previous acquisitions),
and result in a modest deterioration in Jarden's credit ratios.
"Given Jarden's higher credit rating and lower leverage, we believe
this transaction would be credit positive for the company's
existing lenders if it is completed," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst Thomas Hartman.

"The CreditWatch placement reflects our expectation that the
acquisition will improve Visant's credit profile," said Mr.
Hartman.  "However, if the transaction does not close as we expect,
we could assign a negative rating outlook or lower the ratings on
Visant, given the company's high debt leverage and 2017 debt
maturities."  We expect to resolve the CreditWatch placement on
Visant at the close of its acquisition by Jarden, and then withdraw
the ratings on Visant if the acquisition closes as expected.



WAFERGEN BIO-SYSTEMS: Amends 1,500 Class A Units Prospectus
-----------------------------------------------------------
WaferGen Bio-systems, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission an amended Form S-1 registration statement relating to a
firm commitment public offering of 1,500 Class A Units, with each
Class A Unit consisting of 5,618 shares of common stock and 5,618
warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common stock (based on
an assumed offering price per common share of $1.78, which was the
last reported sale price of the Company's common stock on Oct. 13,
2015), together with the shares of common stock underlying those
warrants, at a public offering price of $10,000 per Class A Unit.
Each warrant included in the Class A Units entitles its holder to
purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $[*].

The Company amended the Registration Statement to delay its
effective date.

The Company's common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq
Capital Market under the symbol "WGBS."  On Oct. 13, 2015, the
closing price of the Company's common stock was $1.78 per share.
The Company does not intend to apply for listing of the shares of
preferred stock or warrants on any securities exchange or other
trading system.  The preferred stock and the warrants will be
issued in book-entry form pursuant to a preferred stock agency
agreement between the Company and Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, as preferred stock agent, and a warrant agreement
between the Company and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company,
as warrant agent, respectively.

A copy of the Form S-1/A is available for free at:

                       http://is.gd/YMtKgC

                    About WaferGen Bio-systems

Fremont, California-based WaferGen Bio-systems, Inc., engages in
the development of systems for gene expression quantification,
genotyping and stem cell research.  Since 2008, the Company's
primary focus has been on the development, manufacture and
marketing of its SmartChip System, a genetic analysis platform
used for profiling and validating molecular biomarkers in the life
sciences and pharmaceutical drug discovery industries.

WaferGen Bio-systems reported a net loss of $10.7 million in 2014,
a net loss of $16.3 million in 2013 and a net loss of $8.97 million
in 2012.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $13.2 million in total assets,
$6.9 million in total liabilities and $6.3 million in total
stockholders' equity.


WIRE COMPANY: Oct. 21 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
----------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on October 21, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of Wire Company Holdings, Inc., et al.

The meeting will be held at:

         J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
         844 King St., Room 5209
          Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee. Section 1103 of the
Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may consult with the
debtor, investigate the debtor and its business operations and
participate in the formulation of a plan of reorganization.  The
Committee may also perform other services as are in the interests
of the unsecured creditors whom it represents.



ZYNEX INC: Hires Paul Oberman Interim Chief Financial Officer
-------------------------------------------------------------
Zynex, Inc., engaged C Squared Solutions, LLC to provide interim
chief financial officer services, including strategic financial
planning, financial reporting, and interim executive management
services.  According to the Company, C Squared and its partners
have significant executive management level experience and
financial and accounting experience.  

The interim financial officer services will be performed by Paul
Oberman, a founder and partner of C Squared.  Mr. Oberman has over
40 years of executive leadership and management experience.  Prior
to joining C Squared, Mr. Oberman has served as chief financial
officer for Great American, LLC and MDC Holdings, Inc.  Mr. Oberman
is an alumnus of Deloitte & Touche and KPMG and has a MBA and BBA
from the University of Michigan.  In connection with the C Squared
agreement, Mr. Oberman supported by his staff will provide Interim
CFO support and management services to the Company.  Mr. Oberman's
services to the Company are billed by C Squared, he is not
separately compensated by the Company.

Effective Oct. 8, 2015, Brian P. Alleman's employment as chief
financial officer of Zynex, Inc. was discontinued and upon his
departure expressed no disagreements with management or Company
practices or policies.

Upon the effectiveness of Mr. Alleman's departure, Thomas
Sandgaard, as the Company's sole director, appointed himself to the
role of principal financial and principal accounting officer. Mr.
Sandgaard founded the Company in 1996 after a career in the
semiconductor, telecommunications and medical equipment industries
with ITT, Siemens and Philips Telecom.  Mr. Sandgaard has been the
Company's president, CEO and chairman since 1996 and also currently
serves as the Company's sole director.  Mr. Sandgaard holds a
degree in electronics engineering from University of Southern
Denmark, Denmark and an MBA from the Copenhagen Business School.

                             Zynex Inc.

Zynex, Inc., develops, manufactures and markets medical equipment.
The Lone Tree, Colorado-based Company offers electrotherapy
products for home use, cardiac monitoring apparatus for hospital
use, and EMG and EEG diagnostic devices for neurology clinic use.

Zynex reported a net loss of $6.23 million on $11.1 million of net
revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared to a net loss of
$7.34 million on $21.7 million of net revenue for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2013.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $5.41 million in total assets,
$8.05 million in total liabilities and a $2.63 million total
stockholders' deficit

GHP Horwath, P.C., in Denver, Colorado, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014, noting that the Company incurred significant
losses in 2014 and 2013, and has limited liquidity.  These factors
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.


[*] Bulletproof-Vest Material Co. Fights Bid to Revive FCA Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aebra Coe at Bankruptcy Law360 reported that a bulletproof-vest
materials supplier told a D.C. federal court on Oct. 13, 2015, that
the U.S. government shouldn't get a "second bite at the apple"
after its False Claims Act litigation was trimmed last month,
saying the government's effort to revive some claims that the
company misrepresented the quality of its materials merely
reiterates old arguments.

Toyobo Co. Ltd. told the court that all of the points raised in the
government's request for reconsideration were already considered --
and rejected -- by the court in its 45-page summary judgment.


[*] Higher Default Rates Expected for US Coal Sector, Fitch Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Should Arch Coal, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corp. file for
bankruptcy, the industry bond default rate would surpass 50%,
according to Fitch Ratings.  The wave of bankruptcies in the U.S.
coal space has caused the broader metals/mining (M&M) sector
default rate to rise to double digits for high yield bond and
leveraged loan indices.

A spate of coal defaults has resulted from unsustainably high debt
leverage from past acquisitions amid an environment of weak coal
pricing.  The low pricing and defaults were driven by over-supply
of steam coal and metallurgical coal, burdensome regulations, and
competition from low priced natural gas for electric generation
business.  Three major producers, Patriot Coal Corp., Alpha Natural
Resources Inc., and Walter Energy Inc. as well as some smaller
mining bond issuers including: Xinergy Corp. and Winsway
Enterprises Holdings Ltd. defaulted earlier this year.

Both Arch and Peabody have a reasonable likelihood of default with
an Arch default more likely.  If both large coal producers file for
bankruptcy, Fitch's coal industry trailing 12-month (TTM) bond
default rate (based on dollar volume) jumps to 55% from 28% while
propelling the broader M&M sector TTM rate to 21% from 10%,
narrowly edging the prior high set in 2002.  The TTM M&M leveraged
loan default rate would also climb to 25% from 11% should these two
defaults materialize.

A potential coal bond default rate of 55% is enormous; however, the
sector is an extremely small component of the overall U.S. high
yield market -- the overall high yield market default rate is 2.9%
for TTM September 2015.  Coal accounts for just $15 billion in a
$1.43 trillion high yield bond universe (M&M comprises 4% of the
market, or $61 billion).  Similarly, M&M loans comprise a
relatively small $20 billion (2%) of the $900 billion U.S.
leveraged term loan market.

The large volume of M&M sector defaults, persistence of challenging
coal markets, and lack of strategic buyers for coal properties will
weigh on reorganization enterprise valuations or asset sales prices
in the bankruptcy cases.  Fitch believes low values combined with
overleveraged pre-petition balance sheets will result in low or
zero recovery rates for holders of unsecured M&M debt in the
reorganizations.  The poor recovery expectations are consistent
with the low trading prices on distressed loans and bonds in the
sector.  As of Wednesday, Arch's par weighted senior unsecured
facilities (those involved in the distressed debt exchange) were
bid at 7 while Peabody's par weighted bond facilities were bid at
27.

Arch Coal initially extended an offer for an unsecured for secured
debt exchange on July 2, 2015, which Fitch would deem a selective
default and classify distressed exchange if it eventually proceeds.
If the distressed debt exchange occurs based on the most recent
amount tendered, rather than default triggered by a bankruptcy
where all issues would be counted in the default volume, the M&M
rate would increase to approximately 12%.  The company's secured
lenders are trying to prevent the exchange and the transaction
remains in limbo.  Without an exchange, a bankruptcy filing or
default triggered by a missed interest payment is likely before
year end in Fitch's view.

Peabody Energy's outlook is marginally less dire given its lack of
near term maturities and sufficient liquidity to sustain operations
for the time being, but there is substantial credit risk.  Fitch
forecasts leverage to exceed 9x through 2016 and downgraded the
issuer to 'CCC' in July 2015 to reflect our view that liquidity
could become constrained in the absence of higher metallurgical
coal prices.



[*] Iron Horse to Sell 1,477 Acres of Land in Bankruptcy Auction
----------------------------------------------------------------
On October 29, 2015, Iron Horse Auction Co., Inc. of Rockingham, NC
will sell at public auction 1,477+/- acres consisting of fertile
croplands, merchantable and growing timber, sand mines, residential
development tracts, a waterfront home in Bath, NC, and an executive
home outside of Greenville, NC.

The auction is being conducted by Order of the United States
Bankruptcy Court Appointed Liquidator, Richard D. Sparkman.  Mr.
Sparkman has engaged Iron Horse Auction Co., Inc. to advertise,
market and sell at public auction the subject properties.  The
auction will be conducted on October 29 [th] at 6:00 pm at the
Hilton in Greenville, NC.

The properties will be offered in parcels, groups of parcels and as
a whole, selling in the manner that generates the greatest amount
of money.  There will be no raise of bid opportunities after the
auction is complete, so all interested parties need to be in
attendance.

Will Lilly, an Executive with Iron Horse states, "This auction
represents outstanding opportunity to purchase prime Greenville,
NC/Washington, NC Real Estate.  This auction has something for
everyone including commercial, industrial, residential,
agricultural and recreational properties.  If you are actively
looking for acreage, attendance at this auction is a must.  Mr.
Sparkman must sell these properties as ordered by the United States
Bankruptcy Court."

For further information and details, go to
ironhorseauction.com/brileyfarms or call: 800-997-2248



[*] SEC Readies Clawback Rules for Punishing Bad Accounting
-----------------------------------------------------------
ABI.org reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission is
about to issue new rules that would require companies to punish
accounting missteps by clawing back pay.

In a separate report, Maxwell Murphy at the Wall Street Journal
reported that when errors are found in a company's books, the
responsibility often falls on the finance chief and chief executive
who signed off on the numbers.  And it is up to the board of
directors to decide whether they should be penalized by returning
some of their compensation.

The SEC is about to issue new rules that would take away a board's
discretion in such cases, and would require companies to punish
accounting missteps by clawing back pay from a wider range of top
executives. Failure to do so could cost a company its stock
listing.

Many companies object to the proposed rules, which are awaiting the
SEC's final approval after a public-comment period ended last
month.  Corporate critics say the rules could wallop executives who
had no knowledge of errors in the books or any role in overseeing
them.

"It is overbroad in its reach," said Timothy Donnelly, chief
administrative officer and general counsel of American Vanguard
Corp.  Boards want to avoid a situation in which, for example, a
chief technology officer would be punished "if the [chief financial
officer] decided to cook up some ridiculous scheme," or vice versa,
he said.

American Vanguard, a California chemical maker, has a clawback
policy in place, as do nearly 90% of the nation's 100 largest
public companies, says a recent study by law firm Shearman &
Sterling LLP.  Eight years ago, barely a third of them had such a
policy.

Oil companies Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp. and
package-delivery giant FedEx Corp., said in their comment letters
that the proposed rules were too rigid and usurped too much of a
board's authority. They called for changes they said would make the
impact less onerous.

The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 required the SEC to write the rules, in
hopes that putting executive pay at risk would discourage fraud and
undue risk taking.  The rules apply only to pay that is tied to a
company's financial performance, a type that is increasingly
common.

A recent study by Cornell University and compensation consulting
firm Pearl Meyer & Partners LLC suggests more than half of public
companies tie some portion of executive pay to total shareholder
return—or stock appreciation plus dividend payments—up from 17%
about a decade ago.

That is partly because some proxy advisers, such as Institutional
Shareholder Services, use that benchmark to shape recommendations
to investors about whether they should approve corporate-pay
packages.

Many aspects of the proposed rule aren't clear. "There are too many
variables in the market" to say what portion of performance-based
pay would be at risk under the clawback rules, said compensation
lawyer Jim Barrall of Latham & Watkins LLP.

Some critics also say companies could dodge the new rules simply by
altering their pay packages. "It could have the unintended
consequence" of dialing back the clock to a time when companies
didn't disclose the rationale for bonuses, said John Roe, executive
director of ISS's Corporate Solutions division, which advises
companies on governance policies.

While 86% of S&P 500 companies have voluntary clawback mechanisms
in place, Mr. Roe said, smaller firms have a way to go.

Just 44% of the smaller companies in the broader Russell 3000 stock
index have adopted a policy, he said.

Not everyone objects to the proposed rules. They should go further,
covering a wider range of financial restatements, and force
companies to disclose the sums they recovered and the executives
involved, wrote Heather Slavkin Corzo, director of the AFL-CIO's
office of investment, in a comment letter to the SEC.

The AFL-CIO didn't respond to requests for comment.

Some critics say the new rules are likely to be more of a headache
than a tonic. They could be "the final straw of onerous Dodd-Frank
rules," said Christina Crooks, director of tax policy for the
National Association of Manufacturers.  She said the provision
requiring clawbacks from all executives was especially troubling,
because "you're going to be delisted if you get this wrong."

Companies say they want to keep the teeth in their current clawback
policies because the policies protect both the company and its
investors. But, under the new rules, "almost everybody will have to
rewrite their policy," said Shearman partner Doreen Lilienfeld.


[*] UAW Health Care Trusts Report $20.7 Billion 2014 Shortfall
--------------------------------------------------------------
ABI.org reported that health care trusts created nearly a decade
ago to cover medical expenses for hundreds of thousands of
Detroit's hourly retirees reported a funding shortfall.

In a separate report, Christina Rogers and Jeff Bennett at the Wall
Street Journal reported that healthcare trusts created nearly a
decade ago to cover medical expenses for hundreds of thousands of
Detroit's hourly retirees reported a funding shortfall of
$20.7 billion last year, more than quadruple the gap recorded in
2013, according to government filings.

Administrators of the funds, also known as voluntary employees'
beneficiary association, or VEBAs, said financial reporting rules
require conservative assumptions regarding return estimates,
leading to a higher expected liability.  It is unclear whether the
gap could eventually force the funds—established by the United
Auto Workers union to take retiree medical liabilities for factory
workers off the car companies' books—to cut costs and trim
benefits.

The trusts representing retirees at General Motors Co., Ford Motor
Co. and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV recorded net assets of $60
billion last year, down less than a percentage point from the
previous period, according to filings made with the U.S. Labor
Department.

But the funds' benefit obligations grew 23% to $80.84 billion from
2013 to 2014. At the end of last year, the trusts were 74% funded
versus 93% in the prior year.


[*] Vermont AG Warns of Scam Calls Targeting Bankruptcy Filers
--------------------------------------------------------------
ABI.org reported that Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell is
warning people who have filed or may soon file for bankruptcy of a
scam.

In a separate report, the Associated Press said that Vermont
Attorney General William Sorrell is warning people who have filed
or may soon file for bankruptcy of a scam in which someone claims
to be the consumer's lawyer, the lawyer's partner or a member of
their staff.

The impostors use software to trick the person's caller ID system
so that the call appears to be coming from their bankruptcy lawyer.
They then instruct the unwitting consumer to immediately wire money
to satisfy a debt.


[*] Weitz Joins EisnerAmper's Bankruptcy & Restructuring Practice
-----------------------------------------------------------------
EisnerAmper LLP on Oct. 16 disclosed that Wayne P. Weitz has joined
EisnerAmper's Bankruptcy and Restructuring practices as a Managing
Director.

"Wayne is an acknowledged leader with significant experience in
turnarounds, bankruptcy and restructuring, M&A and complex
bondholder litigation," said Allen Wilen, National Leader of
EisnerAmper's Bankruptcy and Restructuring Group.  "His expertise,
particularly in the energy and natural resources sectors, will
further broaden the services we offer our clients.  We welcome
Wayne to the practice."

Mr. Weitz has more than 25 years of senior level experience
advising clients and executing transactions in operational and
financial management and restructuring, bankruptcy and insolvency
situations and merger and acquisition transactions.  His recent
engagement experience includes debtor and borrower advisory, and
secured and unsecured creditor advisory services.

Mr. Weitz holds leadership positions in the American Bankruptcy
Institute and the Turnaround Management Association.  He is a
graduate of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and
Brandeis University.

EisnerAmper's Bankruptcy and Restructuring Services Group provides
restructuring and investigative advisory services to distressed
companies, unsecured creditors, senior lenders, and trustees in the
middle market environment.

                       About EisnerAmper

EisnerAmper LLP is an accounting and business advisory services
firm and among the largest in the United States.  EisnerAmper
provides audit, accounting, and tax services, as well as corporate
finance, internal audit and risk management, litigation consulting
and forensic accounting, information technology, and other
professional services to a broad range of clients, including
services to more than 200 public companies.  The firm features 180
partners and principals and approximately 1,300 professionals.



[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from October 12 to 16, 2015
----------------------------------------------------------
  Company                 Ticker  Coupon Bid Price  Maturity Date
  -------                 ------  ------ ---------  -------------
ACE Cash Express Inc      AACE    11.000    35.000       2/1/2019
ACE Cash Express Inc      AACE    11.000    38.500       2/1/2019
Affinion
  Investments LLC         AFFINI  13.500    52.000      8/15/2018
Alpha Appalachia
  Holdings Inc            ANR      3.250     6.030       8/1/2015
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc           ANR      9.750     4.000      4/15/2018
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc           ANR      6.000     3.375       6/1/2019
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc           ANR      6.250     4.000       6/1/2021
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc           ANR      7.500     6.875       8/1/2020
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc           ANR      4.875     3.875     12/15/2020
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc           ANR      3.750     3.750     12/15/2017
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc           ANR      7.500     7.000       8/1/2020
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc           ANR      7.500     6.625       8/1/2020
American Eagle
  Energy Corp             AMZG    11.000    19.375       9/1/2019
American Eagle
  Energy Corp             AMZG    11.000    19.375       9/1/2019
Arch Coal Inc             ACI      7.000     4.750      6/15/2019
Arch Coal Inc             ACI      7.250     6.063      6/15/2021
Arch Coal Inc             ACI      9.875     7.900      6/15/2019
Arch Coal Inc             ACI      7.250    11.000      10/1/2020
Arch Coal Inc             ACI      8.000    12.063      1/15/2019
Arch Coal Inc             ACI      8.000    11.645      1/15/2019
Avaya Inc                 AVYA    10.500    34.430       3/1/2021
BPZ Resources Inc         BPZR     8.500    10.550      10/1/2017
BPZ Resources Inc         BPZR     6.500    10.250       3/1/2015
BPZ Resources Inc         BPZR     6.500     9.750       3/1/2049
Basic Energy
  Services Inc            BAS      7.750    44.750      2/15/2019
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR     10.000    30.000     12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR     10.750    28.063       2/1/2016
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR     12.750    32.500      4/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR      6.500    37.800       6/1/2016
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR     10.000    30.750     12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR      5.750    36.000      10/1/2017
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR      5.750    12.250      10/1/2017
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR     10.000    30.125     12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR     10.000    30.500     12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR     10.750    27.250       2/1/2016
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc        CZR     10.000    30.125     12/15/2018
Chaparral Energy Inc      CHAPAR   9.875    37.500      10/1/2020
Chassix Holdings Inc      CHASSX  10.000     8.000     12/15/2018
Chassix Holdings Inc      CHASSX  10.000     8.000     12/15/2018
Claire's Stores Inc       CLE      8.875    41.215      3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc       CLE      7.750    31.500       6/1/2020
Claire's Stores Inc       CLE     10.500    59.980       6/1/2017
Claire's Stores Inc       CLE      7.750    30.000       6/1/2020
Colt Defense LLC /
  Colt Finance Corp       CLTDEF   8.750     9.000     11/15/2017
Colt Defense LLC /
  Colt Finance Corp       CLTDEF   8.750     8.125     11/15/2017
Colt Defense LLC /
  Colt Finance Corp       CLTDEF   8.750     8.125     11/15/2017
Community Choice
  Financial Inc           CCFI    10.750    34.099       5/1/2019
Comstock Resources Inc    CRK      7.750    26.915       4/1/2019
Comstock Resources Inc    CRK      9.500    32.000      6/15/2020
Dendreon Corp             DNDN     2.875    71.625      1/15/2016
Dex Media Inc             DXM     12.000     3.900      1/29/2017
EPL Oil & Gas Inc         EXXI     8.250    36.000      2/15/2018
EXCO Resources Inc        XCO      7.500    27.400      9/15/2018
EXCO Resources Inc        XCO      8.500    25.400      4/15/2022
Emerald Oil Inc           EOX      2.000    30.050       4/1/2019
Endeavour
  International Corp      END     12.000     9.250       3/1/2018
Endeavour
  International Corp      END     12.000     9.250       3/1/2018
Endeavour
  International Corp      END     12.000     9.250       3/1/2018
Energy & Exploration
  Partners Inc            ENEXPR   8.000    15.500       7/1/2019
Energy & Exploration
  Partners Inc            ENEXPR   8.000    14.125       7/1/2019
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc             ENER     3.000     7.875      6/15/2013
Energy Future
  Intermediate Holding
  Co LLC / EFIH
  Finance Inc             TXU     10.000     2.375      12/1/2020
Energy Future
  Intermediate Holding
  Co LLC / EFIH
  Finance Inc             TXU     10.000     2.186      12/1/2020
Energy Future
  Intermediate Holding
  Co LLC / EFIH
  Finance Inc             TXU      6.875     2.186      8/15/2017
Energy XXI Gulf
  Coast Inc               EXXI     9.250    37.472     12/15/2017
Energy XXI Gulf
  Coast Inc               EXXI     7.500    21.000     12/15/2021
Energy XXI Gulf
  Coast Inc               EXXI     6.875    22.375      3/15/2024
Energy XXI Gulf
  Coast Inc               EXXI     7.750    25.200      6/15/2019
FBOP Corp                 FBOPCP  10.000     1.843      1/15/2009
FairPoint
  Communications
  Inc/Old                 FRP     13.125     1.879       4/2/2018
Federal Farm
  Credit Banks            FFCB     2.200    99.750      8/27/2021
Fleetwood
  Enterprises Inc         FLTW    14.000     3.557     12/15/2011
GT Advanced
  Technologies Inc        GTAT     3.000    20.100      10/1/2017
GT Advanced
  Technologies Inc        GTAT     3.000    22.100     12/15/2020
Getty Images Inc          GYI      7.000    31.000     10/15/2020
Getty Images Inc          GYI      7.000    29.750     10/15/2020
Goodman Networks Inc      GOODNT  12.125    41.000       7/1/2018
Goodrich Petroleum Corp   GDP      8.875    20.000      3/15/2019
Goodrich Petroleum Corp   GDP      5.000    22.500      10/1/2032
Goodrich Petroleum Corp   GDP      8.875    19.125      3/15/2019
Goodrich Petroleum Corp   GDP      8.875    19.125      3/15/2019
Gymboree Corp/The         GYMB     9.125    28.713      12/1/2018
Halcon Resources Corp     HKUS     9.750    35.250      7/15/2020
Halcon Resources Corp     HKUS     8.875    32.750      5/15/2021
Hercules Offshore Inc     HERO     8.750    56.834      7/15/2021
Hercules Offshore Inc     HERO     6.750    20.125       4/1/2022
Hercules Offshore Inc     HERO     7.500    17.000      10/1/2021
Hercules Offshore Inc     HERO    10.250    19.875       4/1/2019
Hercules Offshore Inc     HERO     7.500    17.000      10/1/2021
Hercules Offshore Inc     HERO     6.750    20.125       4/1/2022
Hercules Offshore Inc     HERO    10.250    19.875       4/1/2019
Hercules Offshore Inc     HERO     8.750    19.875      7/15/2021
Horsehead Holding Corp    ZINC     3.800    61.900       7/1/2017
Las Vegas Monorail Co     LASVMC   5.500     1.026      7/15/2019
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc            LEH      4.000     7.375      4/30/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc            LEH      5.000     7.375       2/7/2009
Lehman Brothers Inc       LEH      7.500     6.000       8/1/2026
Linn Energy LLC /
  Linn Energy
  Finance Corp            LINE     8.625    34.382      4/15/2020
Linn Energy LLC /
  Linn Energy
  Finance Corp            LINE     6.500    36.700      5/15/2019
Linn Energy LLC /
  Linn Energy
  Finance Corp            LINE     6.250    32.714      11/1/2019
Linn Energy LLC /
  Linn Energy
  Finance Corp            LINE     6.250    31.625      11/1/2019
Linn Energy LLC /
  Linn Energy
  Finance Corp            LINE     6.250    31.625      11/1/2019
Logan's Roadhouse Inc     LGNS    10.750    77.000     10/15/2017
MF Global Holdings Ltd    MF       6.250    15.000       8/8/2016
MF Global Holdings Ltd    MF       3.375    15.000       8/1/2018
MF Global Holdings Ltd    MF       9.000    15.000      6/20/2038
MModal Inc                MODL    10.750    10.125      8/15/2020
Magnetation LLC /
  Mag Finance Corp        MAGNTN  11.000    14.625      5/15/2018
Magnetation LLC /
  Mag Finance Corp        MAGNTN  11.000    14.625      5/15/2018
Magnetation LLC /
  Mag Finance Corp        MAGNTN  11.000    14.625      5/15/2018
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC        MPO     10.750    21.500      10/1/2020
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC        MPO      9.250    25.438       6/1/2021
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC        MPO     10.750    21.625      10/1/2020
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC        MPO     10.750    21.625      10/1/2020
Molycorp Inc              MCP     10.000     5.625       6/1/2020
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp        NGREFN  12.250    31.250      5/15/2019
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp        NGREFN  12.250    31.000      5/15/2019
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp        NGREFN  12.250    28.750      5/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc    JNY      6.875    31.175      3/15/2019
Noranda Aluminum
  Acquisition Corp        NOR     11.000    27.489       6/1/2019
Nuverra Environmental
  Solutions Inc           NES      9.875    54.000      4/15/2018
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC      OMX      5.540    12.800      1/29/2020
Peabody Energy Corp       BTU      6.000    28.895     11/15/2018
Peabody Energy Corp       BTU      6.500    22.500      9/15/2020
Peabody Energy Corp       BTU      6.250    21.480     11/15/2021
Peabody Energy Corp       BTU      6.000    89.000     11/15/2018
Peabody Energy Corp       BTU      6.000    28.125     11/15/2018
Peabody Energy Corp       BTU      6.250    21.250     11/15/2021
Peabody Energy Corp       BTU      6.250    21.250     11/15/2021
Penn Virginia Corp        PVA      8.500    29.000       5/1/2020
Penn Virginia Corp        PVA      7.250    27.948      4/15/2019
Permian Holdings Inc      PRMIAN  10.500    41.250      1/15/2018
Permian Holdings Inc      PRMIAN  10.500    40.875      1/15/2018
Powerwave
  Technologies Inc        PWAV     2.750     0.274      7/15/2041
Powerwave
  Technologies Inc        PWAV     3.875     0.250      10/1/2027
Powerwave
  Technologies Inc        PWAV     3.875     0.250      10/1/2027
Powerwave
  Technologies Inc        PWAV     1.875     0.250     11/15/2024
Powerwave
  Technologies Inc        PWAV     1.875     0.250     11/15/2024
Prospect Holding
  Co LLC / Prospect
  Holding Finance Co      PRSPCT  10.250    39.750      10/1/2018
Prospect Holding
  Co LLC / Prospect
  Holding Finance Co      PRSPCT  10.250    38.060      10/1/2018
Quantum Corp              QTM      3.500    97.641     11/15/2015
Quicksilver
  Resources Inc           KWKA     9.125     6.750      8/15/2019
Quicksilver
  Resources Inc           KWKA    11.000     6.750       7/1/2021
Quiksilver Inc /
  QS Wholesale Inc        ZQK     10.000     8.500       8/1/2020
RAAM Global Energy Co     RAMGEN  12.500     6.000      10/1/2015
Rolta LLC                 RLTAIN  10.750    52.250      5/16/2018
Sabine Oil & Gas Corp     SOGC     7.250    14.250      6/15/2019
Sabine Oil & Gas Corp     SOGC     7.500    14.750      9/15/2020
Sabine Oil & Gas Corp     SOGC     9.750     9.500      2/15/2017
Sabine Oil & Gas Corp     SOGC     7.500    13.500      9/15/2020
Sabine Oil & Gas Corp     SOGC     7.500    13.500      9/15/2020
Samson Investment Co      SAIVST   9.750     1.500      2/15/2020
SandRidge Energy Inc      SD       7.500    26.000      3/15/2021
SandRidge Energy Inc      SD       8.750    25.500      1/15/2020
SandRidge Energy Inc      SD       8.125    25.750     10/15/2022
SandRidge Energy Inc      SD       7.500    25.000      2/15/2023
SandRidge Energy Inc      SD       8.125    25.500     10/16/2022
SandRidge Energy Inc      SD       7.500    22.000      2/16/2023
SandRidge Energy Inc      SD       7.500    26.625      3/15/2021
SandRidge Energy Inc      SD       7.500    26.625      3/15/2021
Savient
  Pharmaceuticals Inc     SVNT     4.750     0.225       2/1/2018
Sequa Corp                SQA      7.000    54.500     12/15/2017
Sequa Corp                SQA      7.000    52.000     12/15/2017
SquareTwo Financial Corp  SQRTW   11.625    65.000       4/1/2017
Swift Energy Co           SFY      7.875    28.500       3/1/2022
Swift Energy Co           SFY      7.125    27.000       6/1/2017
Swift Energy Co           SFY      8.875    28.285      1/15/2020
TMST Inc                  THMR     8.000    13.610      5/15/2013
Talos Production LLC /
  Talos Production
  Finance Inc             TALPRO   9.750    54.000      2/15/2018
Talos Production LLC /
  Talos Production
  Finance Inc             TALPRO   9.750    78.000      2/15/2018
Terrestar Networks Inc    TSTR     6.500    10.000      6/15/2014
Texas Competitive
  Electric Holdings
  Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc             TXU     11.500    38.000      10/1/2020
Texas Competitive
  Electric Holdings
  Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc             TXU     15.000     9.500       4/1/2021
Texas Competitive
  Electric Holdings
  Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc             TXU     10.500    10.000      11/1/2016
Texas Competitive
  Electric Holdings
  Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc             TXU     11.500    41.800      10/1/2020
Texas Competitive
  Electric Holdings
  Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc             TXU     15.000    15.000       4/1/2021
Texas Competitive
  Electric Holdings
  Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc             TXU     10.500     9.250      11/1/2016
Venoco Inc                VQ       8.875    17.600      2/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS     11.750    22.000      1/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS     11.750    22.860      1/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS     11.750    13.800      1/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS     11.375    27.100       8/1/2016
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS     13.000     9.000       8/1/2020
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS      8.750    14.000       2/1/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS     13.000    10.125       8/1/2020
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS     11.750    79.000      1/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS     11.750    20.875      1/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS     11.750    13.500      1/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc         VRS     11.750    20.875      1/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc         WLTG     9.500    32.500     10/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc         WLTG    11.000     2.000       4/1/2020
Walter Energy Inc         WLTG     9.500    49.500     10/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc         WLTG    11.000     2.385       4/1/2020
Walter Energy Inc         WLTG     9.500    32.250     10/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc         WLTG     9.500    32.250     10/15/2019
Warren Resources Inc      WRES     9.000    20.500       8/1/2022
Warren Resources Inc      WRES     9.000    23.250       8/1/2022
Warren Resources Inc      WRES     9.000    23.250       8/1/2022
iHeartCommunications Inc  IHRT    10.000    55.000      1/15/2018
iHeartCommunications Inc  IHRT    10.000    74.438      1/15/2018
iHeartCommunications Inc  IHRT    10.000    55.000      1/15/2018


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2015.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***