TCR_Public/150727.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, July 27, 2015, Vol. 19, No. 208

                            Headlines

AF EVANS: Cal. App. Affirms Denial of DeCaprio's Bid to Vacate
ALEXZA PHARMACEUTICALS: Grants Stock Options to Employees
ALEXZA PHARMACEUTICALS: To Issue 3.5M Shares Under Plans
ALLONHILL LLC: Exclusive Plan Filing Date Extended to Aug. 17
ALLY FINANCIAL: Declares Dividends on Preferred Stock

ALLY FINANCIAL: Two New Directors Join Board
ALONSO & CARUS: Bank Agrees to Aug. 31 Extension of Cash Use
AMERICAN AIRLINES: Order Denying Filing of Untimely Claim Upheld
AMERICAN APPAREL: Holds Meeting to Seek Approval of 3 Proposals
AMERICAN DENTAL: Moody's Hikes Corporate Family Rating to 'B2'

AMF BOWLING: "Unknown Creditor" Can't Pursue Tort Claim
ANCHOR TANK LINES: NY Court Dismisses "Demopoulus" Suit
ANNA'S LINENS: Shewak Lajwanti, Et Al. Oppose DIP Financing Motion
ARRAY BIOPHARMA: Provides Update on Selumetinib in Uveal Melanoma
ARS INVESTMENT: Case Summary & 7 Largest Unsecured Creditors

ATP OIL: Bennu Oil Awarded $13.18-Mil. in Damages
BEAZER HOMES: 7.50% Tangible Equity Units Deregistered From NYSE
BIRMINGHAM COAL: Amends List of 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
BIRMINGHAM COAL: Aug. 3 Fixed as General Claims Bar Date
BIRMINGHAM COAL: Consolidated Creditors Committee Ordered

BIRMINGHAM COAL: Files Schedules of Assets and Liabilities
BIRMINGHAM COAL: Has Authority to Use Cash until September 4
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE: Reports Preliminary Results for 2nd Quarter
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE: Reports Second Quarter 2015 Results
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Adversary Suits Against CEC to Continue

CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Noteholders' Suit v. Parent Can Proceed
CAL DIVE: Suspends Filing of Reports with SEC
CASCADE AG: Emerald Partners' Bid to Withdraw Reference Granted
CATASYS INC: Enters Into $3.3 Million Note with Crede CG
CHARLES EDWARD TAYLOR: Appeal of Brother's Ex-Wife Not Moot

CHINA GINSENG: Closes $1.6 Million Purchase Agreement
CICERO INC: John Steffens Reports 67.5% Stake as of July 15
CITI HELD 2015-PM1: Moody's Assigns (P)Ba3 Rating to Class C Notes
COLDWATER CREEK: Action Removal Period Extended to Oct. 30
COMMERCE LLC: Dist. Court to Hear Trustee's Suit Against Chemence

CORINTHIAN COLLEGES: Proposes to Sell Colorado Springs Assets
CORPORATE RESOURCE: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
CROWN MEDIA: To Launch Hallmark Channel and Hallmark Movies
CRYOPORT INC: Amends 1.4 Million Units Prospectus with SEC
DANA CORP: R.I. Super. Grants Partial Summary Judgment in "Bazor"

DASEKE INC: S&P Retains B+ Issue Level Rating After Loan Revision
DEB STORES: Seeks Exclusive Plan Filing Pd. Extension Thru Dec. 1
DOTS LLC: Loses $872,000 Clawback Suit Against Capstone Media
DOVER DOWNS: Receives Non-Compliance Notice from NYSE
DOWLING COLLEGE: Enters Forbearance Agreement, Moody's Says

ENERGY FUTURE: Amends Chapter 11 Exit Plan
ENERGY FUTURE: Inks Trading & Hedging Deals with Muni-LSEs
ERF WIRELESS: STJV Trust Holds 38% of Series A Pref. Stock
ESCO MARINE: Caterpillar Fin'l Given Additional Adequate Protection
ESCO MARINE: Committee Wants Callidus Credit Bid Capped at $30MM

ESCO MARINE: Court Approves Bidding & Auction Procedures for Assets
EURAMAX HOLDINGS: Files Investor Presentation Materials with SEC
EURAMAX HOLDINGS: Names New President and CEO
EURAMAX HOLDINGS: Unit Launches $385 Million Notes Offering
EURAMAX INTERNATIONAL: Moody's Affirms 'Caa2' Corp. Family Rating

EXELIXIS INC: Signs Underwriting Agreement with Cowen and Company
FAMILY CHRISTIAN: Has Until Oct. 9 to File Chapter 11 Plan
FDD ENTERPRISES: Court Awards $131K to Parking Attendant
FESTIVAL TRANSACTION: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
FLINTKOTE COMPANY: F. Banks, et al., Prevented from Intervening

FORTESCUE METALS: Bank Debt Trades at 17% Off
FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE: Roy Oliver Reports 10.4% Stake as of July 15
FRAC TECH: Bank Debt Trades at 26% Off
FRANKLIN PIERCE: Moody's Withdraws 'Caa3' Rating on 1998/2004 Bonds
FRATERFOOD SERVICE: Court Dismisses Suit vs. DDR Del Sol

FREEDOM INDUSTRIES: Court Approves WVDEP/Chemstream Settlement
FREEDOM INDUSTRIES: Prosecutors Seek Guilty Plea Hearing for Execs
GENESYS RESEARCH: Hires Parker & Associates as Counsel
GENUTEC BUSINESS: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for Aug. 18
GETTY IMAGES: Bank Debt Trades at 27% Off

GLC LIMITED: Hybrid "Good Faith" Test Adopted in Suit vs. Hunter
GLYECO INC: Signs Employment Agreement with CFO
GREEN MOUNTAIN: Big Sky, Mid South Compete for Assets
HAMPTON ROADS: Moody's Gives Ba1 Rating on Ser. 2007A Class I Bonds
HAVEN HOUSE: Case Summary & 8 Largest Unsecured Creditors

HD SUPPLY: May Seek Amendments to Outstanding Credit Agreements
HELIA TEC: Heather Potts Designated as Ch. 11 Plan Agent
HERCULES OFFSHORE: Announces Second Quarter 2015 Results
HERCULES OFFSHORE: Posts $88.3-Mil. Net Loss for Second Quarter
INTERLEUKIN GENETICS: Stockholders Elect Three Directors

INTERLINE BRANDS: S&P Puts 'B' CCR on CreditWatch Positive
ISTAR FINANCIAL: Extends Tender Offer Expiration Date to July 31
JAMES RIVER: Mine Service's Setoff Request Denied
JARDEN CORP: S&P Affirms 'BB' Corporate Credit Rating
JEFFREY J. PROSSER: Bid to Disqualify Ch. 7 Trustee's Attys Denied

JOSEPH UVINO: BofA's Bid to Appoint Receiver Denied
KEVIN MILLER: Habeas Corpus Petition Dismissed with Prejudice
LAKE DEARBORN: Judge Allows Food Court Tenants' Rejection Claims
LIFE PARTNERS: Ad Hoc Committee Supports Bid to End Exclusivity
LONESTAR GEOPHYSICAL: Bank Seeks to Pursue Suit Against Manager

LONESTAR INTERMEDIATE: S&P Affirms 'B' CCR; Outlook Stable
LOS GATOS HOTEL: Wins Extension of Cash Use Until Dec. 31
MAGNETATION LLC: Proposes Up to $1.9MM in Bonuses to 120 Workers
MAMMOTH RESOURCES: Trustee's Bid to Dismiss Cory Appeal Granted
MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT: Entire CNOL Considered as NOL for Reduction

MCCLATCHY CO: Reports Preliminary Second Quarter 2015 Results
MCS GROUP: Moody's Affirms 'B3' Corporate Family Rating
MILAGRO HOLDINGS: July 30 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
MINERAL PARK: Seeks Approval of $500K Settlement with Trafigura
MINERAL TECHNOLOGY: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors

MOTORS LIQUIDATION: GUC Trust Sells 10.2M New GM Common Shares
MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Wilmington Files Trust Report as of June 30
NAARTJIE CUSTOM: Court Grants Bid to Dismiss Chap. 11 Case
NET DATA: Files Amended Schedules of Assets and Liabilities
NET DATA: Files List of Creditors Holding Largest Unsecured Claims

NET DATA: Temporary Legal Service Contract With Landau Approved
NEW YORK LIGHT: Has Interim Authority to Use M&T Cash Collateral
NEW YORK LIGHT: U.S. Trustee Forms Three-Member Creditors Panel
NICHOLS CREEK: Aug. 17 Hearing on Whitney Bid for Case Dismissal
NORTHSHORE MAINLAND: Retains Prime Clerk LLC as Claims Agent

NURSES’ REGISTRY: May Use Cash Collateral Through July 30
OAS SA: Brazilian Cases Recognized as "Foreign Main Proceeding"
ONE2ONE COMMS: 3d Cir. Reverses Dismissal of Plan Order Appeal
PACIFIC GOLD: Sells Interest in Rae Gold and Black Rock Canyon
PATRIOT COAL: Court Approves Executive Bonus Plan

PATRIOT COAL: Creditors Have Until July 27 to File Proofs of Claim
PATRIOT COAL: Files Schedules of Assets and Liabilities
PEABODY ENERGY: Debt Trades at 19% Off
PHYSIOTHERAPY HOLDINGS: Reverses Ruling on Huron Assumption
POINT BLANK: Needs Until Dec. 31 to Remove Actions

PUREWAL ENTERPRISES: Knights Franchise Default Judgment Bid Nixed
QUEST SOLUTION: Reports Preliminary Revenues for the 2nd Quarter
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES: Amends Statement of Financial Affairs
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES: BRG OK'd as Substitute Financial Advisor
R & S ST. ROSE: Bid to Set Aside Dismissal of Appeal Denied

R&G PROPERTIES: Delta Trading's Bid for Final Judgment Denied
R. ALAN KITE: Bid for Partial Dismissal of Son's Appeal Granted
RADIOSHACK CORP: Amends Schedules of Assets and Liabilities
RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Court Rules on Objection to Aniels' Claims
RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Objection to Claim No. 2267 Partly Sustained

RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Ocwen Obtains Partial Summary Judgment
RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Primary Capital's Bid to Dismiss Suit Denied
RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: RBC Mortgage's Bid to Dismiss Suit Denied
ROBERT J. MEIER: Ex-Wife's Priority Claim Allowed
ROVER TECHNOLOGIES: Objection to Final Decree Motion Sustained

SABINE OIL: Court Permits Interim Use of Cash Collateral
SABINE OIL: Has Interim Authority to Pay $18.5MM in Royalties
SABINE OIL: Hires Prime Clerk as Claims and Noticing Agent
SABINE OIL: Meeting to Form Creditors' Panel Set for July 28
SABINE OIL: Seeks Approval of Lease Decision Procedure

SABINE OIL: Seeks to Reject Nabors Drilling, et al., Leases
SABINE OIL: Zolfo Cooper's Jonathan Mitchell to Serve as CRO
SALADWORKS LLC: Seeks Sept. 17 Extension of Plan Filing Period
SEARS HOLDINGS: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' CCR, Outlook Negative
SHERSON GROUP: U.S. Court Issues TRO and Prelim. Injunction

STATE FISH: Has Authority to Use Cash Collateral Until Oct. 15
SUNCOKE ENERGY: Recent Acquisitions No Impact on Moody's Ba3 CFR
SUNTECH AMERICA: Has Unti Aug. 10 to Decide on Unexpired Leases
SUNVALLEY SOLAR: Issues 2 Million Preferred Shares
SURVEYMONKEY INC: Moody's Cuts Corporate Family Rating to 'B3'

TEXAS REGENCY APARTMENTS: Has Interim Authority to Use Cash
TMT GROUP: Temporary Injunction in Suit Over Vantage Shares Upheld
TONYA BROWN: Carlisle Wins Summary Judgment as to R. Brown Claims
TRANS COASTAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
TRANSGENOMIC INC: Registers 3.3 Million Shares for Resale

TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT: Loses Bid to Silence Union Campaign
TWIN RINKS: Estimates Assets and Debt at $10M to $50M
TWIN RINKS: Final Hearing on Cash Collateral Set for Aug. 26
TXU CORP: 2014 Bank Debt Trades at 44% Off
VERMILLION INC: May Issue 4.5 Million Shares Under Stock Plan

VICKIE LYNN MARSHALL: Attorneys' Fees Awarded to Pierce Reversed
VICTORY ENERGY: Amends Rogers Settlement Agreement
VICTORY MEDICAL: Court Hearing on Asset Sale Set for July 28
VIGGLE INC: Expects Fiscal 2015 Revenue to Increase More Than 40%
VIRTUAL PIGGY: Issues $250,200 of Promissory Notes

VIRTUAL PIGGY: Scott McPherson Returns as CFO
VISTEON CORP: Not Prevented by ERISA to Cut OPEB, Del. Court Rules
VYCOR MEDICAL: Amends Form S-1 Prospectus with SEC
VYCOR MEDICAL: Fountainhead Reports 49.9% Stake as of June 30
WANDA TORRENCE: Complaint Against Comcast Dismissed

WASHINGTON HEIGHTS: Meeting of Creditors Scheduled for July 27
WHISKEY ONE: Aug. 13 Hearing on Bid to Dismiss Ch. 11 Case
WPCS INTERNATIONAL: John Stetson Reports 9.9% Stake as of July 23
WPCS INTERNATIONAL: Sells 288,223 Common Shares
XINERGY LTD: Settles Rights to $3MM in Escrowed Funds

Z TRIM HOLDINGS: Signs Purchase Agreement with Fordham
ZOGENIX INC: Millennium Mgmt. Reports 5.6% Stake as of July 22
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week From July 20 to 24, 2015

                            *********

AF EVANS: Cal. App. Affirms Denial of DeCaprio's Bid to Vacate
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two,
affirmed the trial court's order in the case captioned STEVEN
DeCAPRIO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROCKRIDGE PROPERTIES, LLC,
Defendant and Respondent, NO. A143018 (Cal. Ct. App.).

After the trial court granted summary judgment finding that
Rockridge Properties, LLC, was entitled to possession of real
property commonly referred to as 3801 and 3807 Martin Luther King,
Jr. Way, in Oakland, California, Steven DeCaprio filed a motion to
vacate the said order and claimed a right to possession of the
property.  The trial court rejected DeCaprio's claims and stated
that he had failed to submit any evidence to support his claim of
ownership of the property.

DeCaprio appealed, contending, among others, that his procedural
due process rights were violated and that the sale to Rockridge was
not valid.

The Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court properly denied
DeCaprio's claim under Section 1174.3.  It found that DeCaprio
presented no evidence that he owned the property or had any right
to possession.  He also did not prove adverse possession of the
property, the Court of Appeals said.

The Court of Appeals also found no abuse of discretion in the trial
court's denial of DeCaprio's motion to vacate its order.  It found
no violation of DeCaprio's procedural due process rights because he
had the opportunity "to be heard at a meaningful time and in a
meaningful manner" when the trial court held a hearing on his
claims and provided him with a full and fair opportunity to submit
evidence as to his claim of ownership of the property.

A full-text copy of the July 16, 2015 opinion is available at
http://is.gd/umJcgNfrom Leagle.com.

A.F. Evans Company, Inc., is a property developer based in Oakland,
Calif.  The Company sought Chapter 11 protection (Bank. N.D. Calif.
Case No. 09-41727) on March 5, 2009.  Eric A. Nyberg, Esq., at
Kornfield, Nyberg, Bendes and Kuhner, represents the Debtor in its
restructuring effort.  The Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and debts of $100 million to $500 million in its chapter 11
petition.


ALEXZA PHARMACEUTICALS: Grants Stock Options to Employees
---------------------------------------------------------
The Board approved the grant of stock options to certain of Alexza
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s employees including each of Thomas B. King,
Edwin S. Kamemoto and Mark K. Oki, the executive officers,
according to a document filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

The Options were granted under and in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Company's 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and the Form
of Stock Option Grant Notice and Option Agreement and Form of
Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Restricted Unit Award
Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the grants, the Plan and the Related
Agreements, the Options will vest in 48 equal monthly installments
commencing on Aug. 21, 2015, provided in each case that the
executive officer remains employed by the Company through the
applicable vesting date.  The exercise price for the Options is
$1.08, the closing price for the Company's Common Stock on the
Nasdaq Capital Market on the date of those grants.

                                                       Options
Executive Officer                                     Granted
-----------------                                     -------
Thomas B. King                                        400,000
President and Chief Executive Officer

Edwin S. Kamemoto                                     125,000
Executive Vice President, R&D and Development

Mark K. Oki                                           125,000
Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

                           About Alexza

Mountain View, California-based Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc., was
incorporated in the state of Delaware on Dec. 19, 2000, as FaxMed,
Inc.  In June 2001, the Company changed its name to Alexza
Corporation and in December 2001 became Alexza Molecular Delivery
Corporation.  In July 2005, the Company changed its name to Alexza
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

The Company is a pharmaceutical development company focused on the
research, development, and commercialization of novel proprietary
products for the acute treatment of central nervous system
conditions.

Alexza Pharmaceuticals reported a net loss of $36.7 million in 2014
compared to a net loss of $39.6 million in 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $43.2 million in total
assets, $94.8 million in total liabilities, and a $51.7 million
total stockholders' deficit.

Ernst & Young LLP, in Redwood City, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


ALEXZA PHARMACEUTICALS: To Issue 3.5M Shares Under Plans
--------------------------------------------------------
Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc., filed a Form S-8 registration
statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register
an aggregate of 3,505,909 shares of common stock of the Company
issuable under the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and 2015 Non-Employee
Directors' Stock Award Plan.  The proposed maximum aggregate
offering price is $3.8 million.  A copy of the regulatory filing is
available at http://is.gd/Of57pn

                            About Alexza

Mountain View, California-based Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc., was
incorporated in the state of Delaware on Dec. 19, 2000, as FaxMed,
Inc.  In June 2001, the Company changed its name to Alexza
Corporation and in December 2001 became Alexza Molecular Delivery
Corporation.  In July 2005, the Company changed its name to Alexza
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

The Company is a pharmaceutical development company focused on the
research, development, and commercialization of novel proprietary
products for the acute treatment of central nervous system
conditions.

Alexza Pharmaceuticals reported a net loss of $36.7 million in 2014
compared to a net loss of $39.6 million in 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $43.2 million in total
assets, $94.8 million in total liabilities, and a $51.7 million
total stockholders' deficit.

Ernst & Young LLP, in Redwood City, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


ALLONHILL LLC: Exclusive Plan Filing Date Extended to Aug. 17
-------------------------------------------------------------
Allonhill, LLC, sought and obtained from Judge Kevin Gross of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, the extension
of the period within which it may file a Chapter 11 plan to August
17, 2015, and the period within which it may solicit acceptances of
the plan to October 5, 2015.

Aurora Commercial Corp. objected to the Debtor's motion, alleging
that the Debtor has not demonstrated that sufficient "cause" exists
in favor of extending the current exclusive periods.  Seth A.
Nierderman, Esq., at Fox Rothschild LLP, in Wilmington, Delaware,
tells the Court that based on the amount of time already spent by
the Debtor's professionals in preparing a plan, there is no reason
that the Debtor should not be able to file a plan prior to the
expiration of the current exclusive filing period.

The Debtor's counsel, Evan T. Miller, Esq., at Bayard, P.A., in
Wilmington, Delaware, informed the Court that the Debtor and Aurora
have agreed to resolve the Aurora Objection and the Motion in
accordance with the terms set forth in their Stipulation to Further
Extend Time Periods.

Allonhill, LLC is represented by:

          Neil B. Glassman, Esq.
          Justin R. Alberto, Esq.
          Evan T. Miller, Esq.
          BAYARD, P.A.
          222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302)655-5000
          Facsimile: (302)658-6395
          Email: nglassman@bayardlaw.com
                 jalberto@bayardlaw.com
                 emiller@bayardlaw.com

             -- and --

          Christopher R. Donoho, III, Esq.
          Lynn W. Holbert, Esq.
          HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
          875 Third Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212)918-3000
          Facsimile: (212)918-3100
          Email: chris.donoho@hoganlovells.com
                 lynn.holbert@hoganlovells.com

Aurora Commercial Corp. is represented by:

          Seth A. Niederman, Esq.
          FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
          919 North Market Street, Suite 300
          Wilmington, DE 19899-2323
          Telephone: (302)654-7444
          Facsimile: (302)656-8920
          Email: sniederman@foxrothschild.com

             -- and --

          Michael G. Menkowitz, Esq.
          Jason C. Manfrey, Esq.
          FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
          2000 Market Street, 20th Floor
          Philadelphia, PA 19103-3291
          Telephone: (215)299-2000
          Facsimile: (215)299-2150
          Email: mmenkowitz@foxrothschild.com
                 jmanfrey@foxrothschild.com

                     About Allonhill LLC

Allonhill LLC, a professional services firm based in Denver,
Colorado, that previously provided loan due diligence and credit
risk management services for institutions that invest in, sell,
securitize or service mortgage loans, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on March 26, 2014.  The case is
In re Allonhill, LLC, Case No. 14-bk-10663 (Bankr. D. Del.).

The Debtor's General Counsel is HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.  The
Debtor's
Local Counsel is Neil B. Glassman, Esq., Justin R. Alberto, Esq.,
and Evan T. Miller, Esq., at BAYARD, P.A., in Wilmington,
Delaware.
Upshot Services LLC serves as the Debtor's Claims and Noticing
Agent.

The Debtor disclosed $19,205,062 in assets and $32,918,294 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

Roberta A. DeAngelis, U.S. Trustee for Region 3, notified the
Bankruptcy Court that she was unable to appoint an official
committee of unsecured creditors in the case of Allonhill, LLC.
The
U.S. Trustee explained that there were insufficient response to
the
communication/contact for service on the committee.


ALLY FINANCIAL: Declares Dividends on Preferred Stock
-----------------------------------------------------
Ally Financial Inc. has declared quarterly dividend payments for
certain outstanding preferred stock.  Each of these dividends were
declared by the board of directors on July 22, 2015, and are
payable on Aug. 17, 2015.

A quarterly dividend payment was declared on Ally's Fixed Rate
Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series G, of approximately
$23 million, or $17.89 per share, and is payable to shareholders of
record as of Aug. 1, 2015.  Additionally, a dividend payment was
declared on Ally's Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series A, of approximately $14.8 million, or $0.53 per
share, and is payable to shareholders of record as of Aug. 1,
2015.

                        About Ally Financial

Ally Financial Inc., formerly GMAC Inc. -- http://www.ally.com/--
is one of the world's largest automotive financial services
companies.  The Company offers a full suite of automotive
financing products and services in key markets around the world.
Ally's other business units include mortgage operations and
commercial finance, and the company's subsidiary, Ally Bank,
offers online retail banking products.  Ally operates as a bank
holding company.

GMAC obtained a $17 billion bailout from the U.S. government in
exchange for a 56.3 percent stake.  Private equity firm Cerberus
Capital Management LP keeps 14.9 percent, while General Motors Co.
owns 6.7 percent.

                           *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Dec. 16, 2013, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services said it raised its issuer credit rating on Ally Financial
Inc. to 'BB' from 'B+'.  "The upgrade reflects the company's
release from potential legal and financial liabilities stemming
from its ownership of ResCap," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst Tom Connell.

In the April 3, 2014, edition of the TCR, Fitch Ratings has
upgraded Ally Financial Inc.'s long-term Issuer Default Rating
(IDR) and senior unsecured debt rating to 'BB+' from 'BB'.
The rating upgrade reflects increased clarity around Ally's
ownership structure given Ally's recent announcement that it has
launched an initial public offering those shares of its common
stock held by the U.S. Treasury (the Treasury).

As reported by the TCR on July 16, 2014, Moody's Investors Service
affirmed the 'Ba3' corporate family and 'B1' senior unsecured
ratings of Ally Financial, Inc. and revised the outlook for the
ratings to positive from stable.  Moody's affirmed Ally's ratings
and revised its rating outlook to positive based on the company's
progress toward sustained improvements in profitability and
repayment of government assistance received during the financial
crisis.


ALLY FINANCIAL: Two New Directors Join Board
--------------------------------------------
Ally Financial Inc. announced that former financial executive
Maureen Breakiron-Evans and internet executive Michael Steib have
been appointed to the board of directors, effective July 22, 2015.
Breakiron-Evans will also serve on the board's audit committee.

"Both Maureen and Michael will be terrific additions to the Ally
board at this point in the company's journey," said Ally Chairman
Franklin (Fritz) Hobbs.  "Ally has a strong foundation and leading
positions in both the auto finance and online banking sectors and
is poised to expand upon these strengths."

Hobbs continued, "Maureen is a seasoned executive with a broad
range of experience in both management and governance of companies
looking to evolve, grow and deliver for shareholders, and Michael's
experience in online marketplaces and his innovative spirit will
bring a vital perspective to the Ally board, in particular, as we
seek to pursue digital growth strategies.  We look forward to their
contributions."

About Maureen Breakiron-Evans

Breakiron-Evans is a seasoned former financial executive and
corporate board member.  She currently serves on the boards of
Cognizant Technology Solutions and Heartland Payment Systems.
Breakiron-Evans was previously the chief financial officer of
Towers Perrin, until she retired in 2008.  Prior to joining Towers
Perrin, she was the general auditor and enterprise risk manager at
CIGNA Corp.  She also served as CFO of Inovant, LLC, a unit of Visa
that developed and operated its payment and transactions systems
globally. Breakiron-Evans also held several leadership positions at
Transamerica Corp. and was an audit partner with Arthur Andersen.
She is a certified public accountant and serves on the board of
trustees at Stetson University.

About Michael Steib

Steib is the chief executive officer of XO Group, the leading
consumer internet and media company with brands including The Knot,
The Nest and The Bump.  Prior to joining XO Group, Steib served as
CEO of Vente-Privee USA, an ecommerce venture backed by American
Express.  He also spent four years at Google helping to build
Google TV Ads and grow Google Mobile Ads and YouTube's advertising
business.  He also held key positions at NBC and McKinsey &
Company.  Steib was honored as one of Crain's New York 40 Under 40
professionals in 2008 and serves on the board of Literacy Partners,
a nonprofit providing free adult literacy programs to thousands of
New Yorkers.

                        About Ally Financial

Ally Financial Inc., formerly GMAC Inc. -- http://www.ally.com/--
is one of the world's largest automotive financial services
companies.  The Company offers a full suite of automotive
financing products and services in key markets around the world.
Ally's other business units include mortgage operations and
commercial finance, and the company's subsidiary, Ally Bank,
offers online retail banking products.  Ally operates as a bank
holding company.

GMAC obtained a $17 billion bailout from the U.S. government in
exchange for a 56.3 percent stake.  Private equity firm Cerberus
Capital Management LP keeps 14.9 percent, while General Motors Co.
owns 6.7 percent.

                           *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Dec. 16, 2013, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services said it raised its issuer credit rating on Ally Financial
Inc. to 'BB' from 'B+'.  "The upgrade reflects the company's
release from potential legal and financial liabilities stemming
from its ownership of ResCap," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst Tom Connell.

In the April 3, 2014, edition of the TCR, Fitch Ratings has
upgraded Ally Financial Inc.'s long-term Issuer Default Rating
(IDR) and senior unsecured debt rating to 'BB+' from 'BB'.
The rating upgrade reflects increased clarity around Ally's
ownership structure given Ally's recent announcement that it has
launched an initial public offering those shares of its common
stock held by the U.S. Treasury (the Treasury).

As reported by the TCR on July 16, 2014, Moody's Investors Service
affirmed the 'Ba3' corporate family and 'B1' senior unsecured
ratings of Ally Financial, Inc. and revised the outlook for the
ratings to positive from stable.  Moody's affirmed Ally's ratings
and revised its rating outlook to positive based on the company's
progress toward sustained improvements in profitability and
repayment of government assistance received during the financial
crisis.


ALONSO & CARUS: Bank Agrees to Aug. 31 Extension of Cash Use
------------------------------------------------------------
Alonso & Carus Iron Works, Inc., and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
ask the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto
Rico to approve their stipulation extending through and including
August 31, 2015, the period by which the Debtor may use cash
collateral.

Alonso & Carus Iron Works, Inc. is represented by:

          Charles A. Cuprill, Esq.
          Charles A Cuprill, PSC Law Office
          356 Calle Fortaleza
          Second Floor
          San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901
          Tel.: 787 977-0515
          Fax: 787 977-0518
          Email:ccuprill@cuprill.com

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico is represented by:

          Luis C. Marini-Biaggi, Esq.
          Nayuan Zouairabani, Esq.
          O’Neill & Borges, LLC
          American International Plaza
          250 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 800
          San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918
          Tel.: 787 764-8181
          Fax: 787 753-8944
          Email: luis.marini@oneillborges.com
                 nayuan.zouairabani@oneillborges.com

                        About Alonso & Carus

Alonso & Carus Iron Works, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 15-02250) in Old San Juan, Puerto Rico, on
March 27, 2015.  The case is assigned to Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte
Inclan.

The Catano, Puerto Rico-based debtor has filed schedules of assets
and liabilities, disclosing $23,028,113 in total assets and
$14,919,146 in total debts.

The Debtor on the Petition Date filed applications to employ
Charles A Curpill, PSC Law office, as counsel; and CPA Luis R.
Carrasquillo & Co, PSC as financial consultant.


AMERICAN AIRLINES: Order Denying Filing of Untimely Claim Upheld
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jesse M. Furman of the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York affirmed the bankruptcy court's order
denying Gary Bryant's motion to file an untimely proof of claim in
AMR Corporation's Chapter 11 proceedings.

The bankruptcy court found that Bryant's claims, which arose from
conduct that occurred before AMR filed its bankruptcy petition, had
been discharged.  He was also permanently enjoined from commencing
any action with respect to those claims.  Bryant, who had filed his
claim more than a year after the bar date, asserted that he had not
been notified of the Voluntary Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings
and of the bar date.

Judge Furman held that the bankruptcy court did not err in finding
that Bryant had properly received notice of the bar date.  Bryant's
mere affidavit stating that he had never received the notice was
insufficient to overcome the presumption of receipt, Judge Furman
said.

Judge Furman also found that the bankruptcy court did not err in
finding that Bryant had not demonstrated that his failure to timely
file his proof of claim was the result of excusable neglect.

The case is IN RE: AMR CORPORATION, NO. 14-CV-8673(JMF)
(S.D.N.Y.).

A full-text copy of Judge Furman's July 14, 2015 memorandum opinion
and order is available at http://is.gd/27sOJ6from Leagle.com.

AMR Corporation is represented by:

          Stephen Andrew Youngman, Esq.
          WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
          767 Fifth Avenue,
          New York, NY 10153-0119
          Tel: (212) 310-8000
          Fax: (212) 310-8007
          Email: stephen.youngman@weil.com

                   About American Airlines

AMR Corp. and its subsidiaries including American Airlines filed
for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 11-15463)
in Manhattan on Nov. 29, 2011, after failing to secure cost-cutting
labor agreements.  AMR, previously the world's largest airline
prior to mergers by other airlines, is the last of the so-called
U.S. legacy airlines to seek court protection from creditors.  It
was the third largest airline in the United States at the time of
the bankruptcy filing.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP serves as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtors.  Paul Hastings LLP and Debevoise & Plimpton LLP Groom Law
Group, Chartered, are on board as special counsel.  Rothschild
Inc., is the financial advisor.  Garden City Group Inc. is the
claims and notice agent.

Jack Butler, Esq., John Lyons, Esq., Felecia Perlman, Esq., and Jay
Goffman, Esq., at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP serve as
counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in AMR's
chapter 11 proceedings.  Togut, Segal & Segal LLP is the co-counsel
for conflicts and other matters; Moelis & Company LLC is the
investment banker, and Mesirow Financial Consulting, LLC, is the
financial advisor.

The Retiree Committee is represented by Jenner & Block LLP's
Catherine L. Steege, Esq., Charles B. Sklarsky, Esq., and Marc B.
Hankin, Esq.

AMR and US Airways Group, Inc., on Feb. 14, 2013, announced a
definitive merger agreement under which the companies will combine
to create a premier global carrier, which will have an implied
combined equity value of approximately $11 billion.

The bankruptcy judge on Sept. 12, 2013, confirmed AMR Corp.'s plan
to exit bankruptcy through a merger with US Airways.  By
distributing stock in the merged airlines, the plan is designed to
pay all creditors in full, with interest.

Judge Sean Lane confirmed the Plan despite the lawsuit filed by the
U.S. Department of Justice and several states' attorney general
complaining that the merger violates antitrust laws.

In November 2013, AMR and the U.S. Justice Department a settlement
of the anti-trust suit.  The settlements require the airlines to
shed 104 slots at Reagan National Airport in Washington and 34 at
LaGuardia Airport in New York.

AMR stepped out of Chapter 11 protection after its $17 billion
merger with US Airways was formally completed on Dec. 9, 2013.

                          *     *     *

The Troubled Company Reporter, on Sep. 2, 2014, reported that
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services revised its rating outlooks on
American Airlines Group Inc. (AAG) and its subsidiaries American
Airlines Inc. and US Airways Inc. to positive from stable.  At the
same time, S&P affirmed its ratings on the companies, including the
'B' corporate credit ratings.

The TCR, on April 13, 2015, reported that Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services assigned its 'BB' issue-level rating and '1' recovery
rating to American Airlines Inc.'s (American; B+/Positive/--) $750
million amended term loan B due Oct. 10, 2021.  The term loan is
guaranteed by the company's parent, American Airlines Group Inc.,
and its affiliates, US Airways Group Inc. and US Airways Inc. S&P's
'1' recovery rating indicates its expectation of a "very high"
(90%-100%) recovery in a default scenario.

The TCR also reported on April 10, 2015, that following the
announcement by American Airlines, Inc. that it would re-price and
alter the collateral package for its $1.15 billion senior secured
credit facility, Fitch's ratings on the facility remain unchanged
at 'BB+/RR1'.


AMERICAN APPAREL: Holds Meeting to Seek Approval of 3 Proposals
---------------------------------------------------------------
American Apparel, Inc., held its 2015 annual meeting of
stockholders on July 16, 2015.  The following proposals were
presented to a vote of the stockholders at the Annual Meeting and
received the votes indicated:

Proposal 1: To elect Laura A. Lee, Thomas J. Sullivan and Lyndon
Lea to the Board of Directors, each to serve for a term of three
years and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified
at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or such director's
earlier death, resignation or removal:

    Director                        Votes For   Votes Withheld
    --------                       -----------  --------------
Laura A. Lee                       35,290,307    62,278,984(1)
Thomas J. Sullivan                 33,690,575    63,708,427(1)
Lyndon Lea                        101,138,025(2)  3,440,662

Proposal 2: To ratify the appointment of Marcum LLP as the
Company's independent auditors for the fiscal year ending Dec. 31,
2015:

       Votes For             Votes Against       Abstain
     ------------            -------------    -------------
      73,400,796               6,300,424      64,066,642(3)

Proposal 3: To approve an amendment to the Company's Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of the Company's common stock disclosed in the
proxy statement for the Annual Meeting:

     Votes For               Votes Against        Abstain
  --------------             -------------     --------------
    56,124,621                25,258,215        60,629,794(3)


(1) Includes 59,994,034 shares withheld (or instructed to be
withheld) by Dov Charney.

(2) Includes 59,994,034 shares voted (or instructed to be voted) by
Mr. Charney, in accordance with his obligations under that
certain Investment Voting Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2009,
between Mr. Charney and Lion Capital (Guernsey) II Limited.

(3) Includes 59,994,034 shares that Mr. Charney abstained from
voting (or were instructed to be abstained from voting by Mr.
Charney).

                      About American Apparel

American Apparel is a vertically-integrated manufacturer,
distributor, and retailer of branded fashion basic apparel based
in downtown Los Angeles, California.  As of Sept. 30, 2014,
American Apparel had approximately 10,000 employees and operated
245 retail stores in 20 countries including the United States and
Canada.  American Apparel also operates a global e-commerce site
that serves over 60 countries worldwide at
http://www.americanapparel.com. In addition, American Apparel     


operates a leading wholesale business that supplies high quality
T-shirts and other casual wear to distributors and screen
printers.

Amid liquidity problems and declining sales, American Apparel in
early 2011 reportedly tapped law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom and investment bank Rothschild Inc. for advice on a
restructuring.

In April 2011, American Apparel said it raised $14.9 million in
rescue financing from a group of investors led by Canadian
financier Michael Serruya and private equity firm Delavaco Capital
Corp., allowing the casual clothing retailer to meet obligations
to its lenders for the time being.  Under the deal, the investors
were buying 15.8 million shares of common stock at 90 cents
apiece.  The deal allows the investors to purchase additional
27.4 million shares at the same price.

American Apparel reported a net loss of $68.8 million in 2014, a
net loss of $106 million in 2013 and a net loss of $37.3
million in 2012.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $271 million in total assets,
$416 million in total liabilities and a $144 million total
stockholders' deficit.

                           *     *     *

The TCR reported on Nov. 21, 2013, that Moody's Investors Service
downgraded American Apparel Inc.'s corporate family rating to
Caa2.  The clothing retailer's probability of default was also
lowered one level and the outlook is negative.

As reported by the TCR on Sept. 2, 2014, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services lowered its corporate credit rating on Los Angeles-based
American Apparel Inc. to 'CCC-' from 'CCC'.  The outlook is
negative.


AMERICAN DENTAL: Moody's Hikes Corporate Family Rating to 'B2'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded American Dental Partners, Inc.'s
("ADPI") Corporate Family Rating to B2 from B3, Probability of
Default rating to B2-PD from B3-PD, and senior secured credit
facilities' rating to B1 from B2. The rating outlook is stable.
This rating action concludes the ratings review of ADPI initiated
on June 16, 2015.

The upgrade reflects the reduction in adjusted debt due to changes
in Moody's approach for capitalizing operating leases. The updated
approach for standard adjustments for operating leases is explained
in the cross-sector rating methodology Financial Statement
Adjustments in the Analysis of Non-Financial Corporations,
published on June 15, 2015. The upgrade also considers improved
operating performance due to the realization of earnings
attributable to recent cost reduction initiatives, and reflects
Moody's expectation that the company will maintain a disciplined
acquisition strategy and good availability under combined sources
of internal and external liquidity.

American Dental Partners, Inc.

Ratings upgraded:

Corporate Family Rating, to B2 from B3
Probability of Default Rating, to B2-PD from B3-PD
Senior secured credit facilities, to B1 (LGD3) from B2 (LGD3)

The rating outlook is stable.

RATING RATIONALE

ADPI's B2 Corporate Family Rating reflects the company's small
absolute size based on revenue and earnings, high financial
leverage, and modest interest coverage relative to other single-B
rated companies. However, ADPI's credit profile benefits from its
solid market presence within the DSO industry. We expect the
company to continue to pursue a de novo office growth strategy over
the intermediate-term. Although we expect this strategy to
constrain near-term profit margins and free cash flow, the rating
is supported by the company's flexibility to reduce de novo growth
if desired, and its ability to then deploy free cash flow toward
debt reduction.

The rating outlook is stable, and reflects our assumption that the
company's de novo and acquisition growth strategy will be financed
through internally-generated cash. In addition, the stable outlook
incorporates our expectation that the company will maintain a good
liquidity profile, and does not reflect any significant debt-funded
acquisitions shareholder initiatives.

An upgrade of the ratings is unlikely over the near-term due to the
company's small absolute size, and de novo office growth strategy,
which Moody's expects will constrain free cash flow and limit debt
repayment. Over time, the rating could be upgraded if the company
can significantly enhance its revenue size and diversity, adjusted
debt to EBITDA is sustained below 4 times, and free cash flow to
debt exceeds 8%.

The ratings could be downgraded if adjusted debt to EBITDA
approaches 6 times, or if free cash flow turns negative on a
sustained basis. The ratings could also be lowered if financial
policies become more aggressive or if liquidity deteriorates.

Headquartered in Wakefield, Massachusetts, American Dental
Partners, Inc. ("ADPI") is a leading dental service organization
("DSO") in the United States. The company provides dental
facilities, support staff and comprehensive business support
functions under management services agreements to its affiliated
dental groups. ADPI provides all services necessary for the
administration of the non-clinical aspects of the dental operations
(e.g. organizational planning, IT support, and financial reporting)
while the affiliated practices are responsible for providing dental
care to patients. The company is privately-owned by financial
sponsor JLL Partners, Inc., and generated adjusted gross and net
revenues of approximately $420 million and $271 million,
respectively, over the 12 months ended March 31, 2015.



AMF BOWLING: "Unknown Creditor" Can't Pursue Tort Claim
-------------------------------------------------------
District Judge John A. Gibney Jr. affirmed the Order of the
Bankruptcy Court in the case captioned EMIKO BOARD, Appellant, v.
AMF BOWLING WORLDWIDE, INC., Appellee, CASE NO. 3:14-CV-00822-JAG
(E.D. Va., Richmond Div.).

Emiko Board appealed the Bankruptcy Court's denial of her "Motion
for Declaration that Discharge Injunction Is Not Applicable or, in
the Alternative, for Extension of Time Within Which to Make
Application for Payment of Administrative Expense Claim."  Board
sought a declaration that would allow her to pursue her tort claim
against AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc.

Judge Gibney concluded that Board was an unknown creditor and,
thus, was entitled to only constructive notice of the
administrative claims bar date in AMF's case. Moreover, Judge
Gibney held that AMF's notice published in The Wall Street Journal
and The Richmond Times Dispatch met the requirements of due
process.

A copy of the June 26, 2015 opinion is available at
http://is.gd/2BwMy2from Leagle.com.

                    About AMF Bowling Worldwide

AMF Bowling Worldwide Inc. is the largest operator of bowling
centers in the world.  The Company and several affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case Nos. 12-36493 to
12-36508) on Nov. 12 and 13, 2012, after reaching an agreement
with a majority of its secured first lien lenders and the landlord
of a majority of its bowling centers to restructure through a first
lien lender-led debt-for-equity conversion, subject to higher and
better offers through a marketing process.  At the time of the
bankruptcy filing, AMF operated 262 bowling centers across the
United States and, through its non-Debtor facilities, and 8 bowling
centers in Mexico -- more than three times the number of bowling
centers of its closest competitor.

Debt for borrowed money totals $296 million, including
$216 million on a first-lien term loan and revolving credit,
and $80 million on a second-lien term loan.

Mechanicsville, Virginia-based AMF first filed for bankruptcy
reorganization in July 2001 and emerged with a confirmed
Chapter 11 plan in February 2002 by giving unsecured creditors
7.5% of the new stock.  The bank lenders, owed $625 million,
received a combination of cash, 92.5% of the stock, and $150
million in new debt.  At the time, AMF had over 500 bowling
centers.

Judge Kevin R. Huennekens oversees the 2012 case, taking over from
Judge Douglas O. Tice, Jr., following Judge Tice's retirement from
the bench.  Patrick J. Nash, Jr., Esq., Jeffrey D. Pawlitz, Esq.,
and Joshua A. Sussberg, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP; and Dion W.
Hayes, Esq., John H. Maddock III, Esq., and Sarah B. Boehm, Esq.,
at McGuirewoods LLP, served as the Debtors' counsel.  Moelis &
Company LLC served as the Debtors' investment banker and financial
advisor.  McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services U.S., LLC,
served as the Debtors' restructuring advisor.  Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC served as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

Kristopher M. Hansen, Esq., Sayan Bhattacharyya, Esq., and
Marianne S. Mortimer, Esq., at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP; and
Peter J. Barrett, Esq., and Michael A. Condyles, Esq., at Kutak
Rock LLP, represented the first lien lenders.

An ad hoc group of second lien lenders was represented by Lynn L.
Tavenner, Esq., and Paula S. Beran, Esq., at Tavenner & Beran,
PLC; and Ben H. Logan, Esq., Suzzanne S. Uhland, Esq., and
Jennifer M. Taylor, Esq., at O'Melveny & Myers LLP.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors retained Pachulski
Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as its lead counsel; Christian & Barton,
LLP as its local counsel; and Mesirow Financial Consulting, LLC as
its financial advisors.

AMF emerged from its 2012 bankruptcy eight months later, in July
2013, implementing a plan of reorganization that gives ownership of
the business to second-lien creditors owed $80 million and to
Strike Holdings LLC, the owner of six high-end bowling centers
operating under the name Bowlmor.  The bankruptcy court approved
the plan with a June 25 confirmation order.

The second-lien group that bought most of AMF includes affiliates
of Cerberus Capital Management LP and JPMorgan Chase & Co., who
together held 70 percent of the second-lien debt and 11.5 percent
of the first-lien notes.  The plan paid off the first-lien debt in
full with interest at the non-default rate.


ANCHOR TANK LINES: NY Court Dismisses "Demopoulus" Suit
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Lorna G. Schofield of the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York dismissed a complaint filed by
Demos P. Demopoulos, et. al., seeking damages from Anchor Tank
Lines LLC, et. al., in connection with payments that were required,
but not made, to International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 553's
benefit funds, as well as the enforcement of judgments that the
Plaintiffs have been awarded in the past.

The Plaintiffs allege that (1) the individual defendants breached
their fiduciary obligations to the Funds under the Employment
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 by failing to make
contributions and instead retaining the monies for their own use;
(2) the Tank defendants failed to make contributions to the Funds
and to make payments under the settlement agreement in Demopolous;
(3) unjust enrichment; (4) all defendants must make an accounting
"of all sums owed to the Funds," based on the general remedies
section of ERISA; and (5) Leonard Bardari's personal guaranty of
the settlement in Demopoulos I must be enforced.

Judge Schofield dismissed the claims for delinquent payments,
unjust enrichment and an accounting against the Tank defendants, as
well as the claim to enforce Leonard Baldari's personal guaranty in
Demopoulos I, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Judge Schofield held that the Plaintiffs knew that fiduciaries who
controlled Anchor I and Reliable had breached their duty between
2007 and 2009 to ensure that the companies made the required
payments.  By 2010, the Plaintiffs knew the identities of all three
individual defendants in relation to Anchor I and Reliable and
could definitively infer their attendant fiduciary obligations to
the Funds.  Since the law suit was not commenced until 2014, it is
time barred under ERISA's second statutory limitations period --
three years from when the Plaintiffs had actual knowledge that "an
ERISA fiduciary has breached his or her duty."

The case is DEMOS P. DEMOPOULOS, et. al. Plaintiffs, v. ANCHOR TANK
LINES, LLC, et. al., Defendants, Case No. 14 CIV. 7101, (S.D.N.Y.)

A full-text copy of Judge Schofield's Opinion and Order dated July
20, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/9FZn7Afrom Leagle.com.

Anchor Tank Lines LLC and Tank Acquisition Company LLC are
represented by:

          Howard Klienhendler, Esq.
          Sara G. Spiegelman, Esq.
          WATCHEL & MISSRY, LLP
          One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza
          885 Second Avenue
          New York, NY 10017
          Telephone: (866)526-2877
          Facsimile: (212)371-0320
                 
Leonard Baldari, Michael David Hiller and Robert Baldari are
represented by:

          Adam J. Richards, Esq.
          O'REILLY STOUTENBURG RICHARDS LLP
          32 East 57th Street
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212)419-9880
          Facsimile: (212)812-3328
          Email: adam@osrlaw.com

Astoria, New York-based Anchor Tank Lines Corp., dba Reliable
Transit Corp., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code on June 3, 2010 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y., Case No. 10-45230).  The
Debtor's Counsel is Andrea Fischer, Esq., at Olshan Grundman Frome
Rosenzweig Wolosky, in New York.


ANNA'S LINENS: Shewak Lajwanti, Et Al. Oppose DIP Financing Motion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Shewak Lajwanti Home Fashions, Inc. and its affiliated creditors
ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California, Santa Ana Division, to deny the the DIP Financing
Motion and the Assumption Motion that Anna's Linens, Inc. had
filed.

Counsel to the Objectors, Steven T. Gubner, Esq., at Ezra Brutzkus
Gubner LLP, in Woodland Hills, California, relates that by the DIP
Financing Motion, the Debtor seeks approval to obtain an $80
million senior secured super-priority revolving credit facility
from the DIP Lenders, the proceeds of which will be used solely to:
(a) extinguish certain Pre-Petition Obligations in the amount of
approximately $66.425 million, consisting of approximately (1) $63
million in principal and interest, (2) $3.2 million in early
termination fees, and (3) $225,000 in credit monitoring fees; (b)
pay fees, costs and expenses in connection with the DIP Financing
Agreement, including payment of the Agent's and DIP Lender's
reasonable attorney's fees and other out of pocket expenses; (c)
pay Debtor's postpetition operating expenses incurred in the
ordinary course of business; (d) pay costs and expenses of
administration of this Chapter 11 Case, including payment of the
Debtor’s professional fees; and, (e) pay other amounts as
specified in the Approved Budget and/or operative documentation and
allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, in the case of (c) through (e), in
amounts and categories consistent with the Approved Budget.

Given these set-up, Mr. Gubner tells the Court, the DIP Financing
will ultimately provide the Debtor with only $13.6 million of new
money.

Mr. Gubner adds that the DIP Financing is also subject to borrowing
and availability limitations that may further reduce, or completely
eliminate, the New Money available to the Debtor by virtue of the
DIP Financing.

Mr. Gubner asserts that Shewak Lajwanti and related creditors,
referred to as the Vendors, file their Objection because it appears
that the DIP Financing Motion and related motion are intended to be
vehicles for Salus Capital Partners, LLC, as agent for the DIP
Lenders, to foreclose on prepetition collateral quickly; to shift
the expenses (including out of pocket expenses and attorneys' fees)
of that foreclosure to the estate's general unsecured creditors,
while simultaneously encumbering free-and-clear assets that should
be liquidated for the benefit of the estate's general unsecured
creditors.

Mr. Gubner further argues that the Motions unreasonably seek to
give the DIP Lenders an interest in Chapter 5 causes of action to
the detriment of unsecured creditors. He adds that the Agent and
the DIP Lenders are to receive general releases from the estate and
parties-in-interest of any and all claims against them (including
those under section 506(c) of the Bankruptcy Code). Mr. Gubner says
that even more concerning, the Debtor ask that all of the foregoing
be approved before the Debtor's filings of its schedules or any
disclosure of any analysis of the potential challenges to the
Agent's or DIP Lender's liens or claims or the potential recovery
actions against the Agent and/or the DIP Lender.

Shewak Lajwanti Home Fashions, Inc., P&A Marketing, Inc., and Panda
Home Fashions, LLC are represented by:

          EZRA BRUTZKUS GUBNER LLP
          Steven T. Gubner, Esq.
          Jerrold L. Bregman, Esq.
          Michael W. Davis, Esq.
          21650 Oxnard Street, Suite 500
          Woodland Hills, CA 91367
          Telephone: (818)827-9000
          Facsimile: (818)827-9099
          Email: sgubner@ebg-law.com
                 jbregman@ebg-law.com
                 mdavis@ebg-law.com

                     About Anna's Linens, Inc.

Anna's Linens is a specialty retailer offering home textiles,

furnishings and decor at attractive prices.  Headquartered in

Costa Mesa, California, operates a chain of 268 company owned

retail stores throughout 19 states in the United States
(including
 Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C.) generates over $300
million in 
annual revenue and employs a workforce of over 2,500
associates.



Anna's Linens sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
C.D.
Cal. Case No. 15-13008) in Santa Ana, California, on June
14,
2015.



The case is assigned to Judge Theodor Albert.  The Debtor tapped

Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP as counsel.  The
Debtor
e stimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and debt
of $100
million to $500 million.



The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of Anna's Linens

Inc. appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee

of unsecured creditors.





ARRAY BIOPHARMA: Provides Update on Selumetinib in Uveal Melanoma
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AstraZeneca announced that the Phase 3 SUMIT study of selumetinib
in combination with dacarbazine for the treatment of patients with
metastatic uveal melanoma did not meet its primary endpoint of
progression free survival.  This combination therapy showed an
adverse event profile generally consistent with current knowledge
of the safety profiles of dacarbazine and selumetinib.  A full
evaluation of the data is ongoing.

Selumetinib is a MEK inhibitor in late-stage development, with a
primary Phase 3 program in second-line KRAS-mutant advanced
non-small cell lung cancer in combination with docetaxel.
Selumetinib is also being investigated in a Phase 3 study in
differentiated thyroid cancer and in a Phase 2 registration study
in patients with neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Antoine Yver, Head of Oncology, Global Medicines Development at
AstraZeneca said: "Selumetinib is supported by a strong development
program with different scientific rationale in multiple tumor types
as both monotherapy and in alternative combinations.  The findings
from SUMIT have no impact on the other studies and we look forward
to presenting the data in due course."

                About Selumetinib and Uveal Melanoma

Selumetinib is an oral small molecule MEK inhibitor invented by
Array BioPharma (NASDAQ: ARRY) and licensed to AstraZeneca in 2003.
AstraZeneca is responsible for development and commercialization
of selumetinib.  Selumetinib inhibits the MEK enzyme in the
RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway in cancer cells to prevent the tumor from
growing.

The Selumetinib in Uveal Melanoma Investigator Trial (SUMIT) is a
randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial being carried
out in 45 centers, across 11 countries.

Uveal melanoma is an orphan disease in which cancer cells grow in
the tissues of the eye.  It is the most common primary intraocular
malignancy in adults and comprises 5% of all melanomas.  There are
currently no effective treatments for advanced uveal melanoma and
in April 2015, selumetinib was granted Orphan Drug Designation by
the US Food and Drug Administration in recognition of the need for
new, safe and effective therapies for the disease.

                      About Array Biopharma

Boulder, Colo.-based Array BioPharma Inc. is a biopharmaceutical
company focused on the discovery, development and
commercialization of targeted small-molecule drugs to treat
patients afflicted with cancer and inflammatory diseases.  Array
has four core proprietary clinical programs: ARRY-614 for
myelodysplastic syndromes, ARRY-520 for multiple myeloma, ARRY-797
for pain and ARRY-502 for asthma.  In addition, Array has 10
partner-funded clinical programs including two MEK inhibitors in
Phase 2: selumetinib with AstraZeneca and MEK162 with Novartis.

Array Biopharma incurred a net loss of $85.3 million for the year
ended June 30, 2014, a net loss of $61.9 million for the year
ended June 30, 2013, and a net loss of $23.6 million for the year
ended June 30, 2012.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $208 million in total assets,
$158 million in total liabilities, and $50.2 million in total
stockholders' equity.

"If we are unable to generate enough revenue from our existing or
new collaboration and license agreements when needed or to secure
additional sources of funding, it may be necessary to
significantly reduce the current rate of spending through further
reductions in staff and delaying, scaling back, or stopping
certain research and development programs, including more costly
Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials on our wholly-owned or co-
development programs as these programs progress into later stage
development.  Insufficient liquidity may also require us to
relinquish greater rights to product candidates at an earlier
stage of development or on less favorable terms to us and our
stockholders than we would otherwise choose in order to obtain up-
front license fees needed to fund operations.  These events could
prevent us from successfully executing our operating plan and, in
the future, could raise substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern," according to the quarterly report
for the period ended Sept. 30, 2014.


ARS INVESTMENT: Case Summary & 7 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: ARS Investment Group, LLC
        4974 N. Fresno St. #215
        Fresno, CA 93726

Case No.: 15-12885

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 22, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of California (Fresno)

Judge: Hon. Fredrick E. Clement

Debtor's Counsel: Justin D. Harris, Esq.
                  HARRIS LAW FIRM, PC
                  7110 N. Fresno St., Suite 400
                  Fresno, CA 93720
                  Tel: 559-272-5700
                  Email: jdh@harrislawfirm.co

Total Assets: $1.1 million

Total Liabilities: $1.2 million

The petition was signed by Alex Kodnegah, managing member.

A list of the Debtor's seven largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/caeb15-12885.pdf


ATP OIL: Bennu Oil Awarded $13.18-Mil. in Damages
-------------------------------------------------
Judge Marvin Isgur of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
Southern District of Texas, Houston Division awarded Bennu Oil &
Gas, LLC, damages totaling $13,186,254, in connection with its
agreement with Bluewater Industries, L.P.

Bennu incurred $29,709,192 in direct damages as a result of the
failed umbilical.  Bennu owes Bluewater $16,522,937 in connection
with the contracts it assumed.  Bennu filed a complaint against
Bluewater and Technip Inc. relating to contract work performed on
the Clipper Project.  Bennu and Technip entered into a settlement
agreement resolving all claims against one another in the action.
There are two remaining components to the lawsuit: (i) Bennu's
breach of warranty claim against Bluewater and (ii) Bluewater's
counterclaim against Bennu to recover alleged amounts owed under
the parties' contracts.  Bennu and Bluewater each filed motions for
summary judgment.  Bluewater's motion for partial summary judgment
as to certain categories of damages claimed by Bennu was granted in
part and denied in part.  The first part of Bennu's Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment regarding the non-Clipper claims was
granted.  Summary judgment regarding the non-Clipper Telemark
claims was denied and reserved for trial.  By agreement of the
parties, the second part of the motion regarding lien validity was
abated and will be incorporated into the final judgment.  

Judge Isgur found that Bluewater is not legally excused from
performing its warranty obligations and found that (i) Bennu has
satisfied its initial burden of proving of that no fault
independent of Bluewater's workmanship or materials caused the
failure; (ii) Bluewater failed to rebut the inference by proving
that the failure of the umbilical was the result of something
outside of Bluewater's scope; and (iii) Bluewater's indemnity
defense fails as a matter of law.  Accordingly, Bennu has prevailed
on its breach of warranty claim.

The adversary proceeding is BENNU OIL & GAS, LLC, Plaintiff(s), v.
BLUEWATER INDUSTRIES, L.P., et al., Defendant(s), ADVERSARY NO.
14-3001, (S.D. Tex.).

The bankruptcy case is IN RE: ATP OIL & GAS CORPORATION, Chapter 7,
Debtor(s), Case No. 12-36187 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.).

A full-text copy of Judge Marvin Isgur's Memorandum Opinion dated
July 15, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/ltEtlNfrom
Leagle.com.

                        About ATP Oil

Houston, Texas-based ATP Oil & Gas Corporation is an international
offshore oil and gas development and production company focused in
the Gulf of Mexico, Mediterranean Sea and North Sea.

ATP Oil & Gas filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case
No. 12-36187) on Aug. 17, 2012.  Attorneys at Mayer Brown LLP,
serve as bankruptcy counsel.  Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., is
the conflicts counsel.  Motley Rice LLC and Fayard & Honeycutt, APC
serve as special counsel.  Opportune LLP is the financial advisor
and Jefferies & Company is the investment banker.

Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the claims and notice agent.

ATP disclosed assets of $3.6 billion and $3.5 billion of
liabilities as of March 31, 2012.  Debt includes $365 million on a
first-lien loan where Credit Suisse AG serves as agent.  There is
$1.5 billion on second-lien notes with Bank of New York MellonTrust
Co. as agent.  ATP's other debt includes $35 million on convertible
notes and $23.4 million owing to third parties for their shares of
production revenue.  Trade suppliers have claims for $147 million,
ATP said in a court filing.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.  Evan R. Fleck, Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy,
in New York, represents the Creditors Committee as counsel.

A seven-member panel of equity security holders has also been
appointed in the case.  Kyung S. Lee, Esq., and Charles M. Rubio,
Esq. of Diamond McCarthy LLP, in Houston, Texas, serve as counsel
to the Equity Committee.


BEAZER HOMES: 7.50% Tangible Equity Units Deregistered From NYSE
----------------------------------------------------------------
The New York Stock Exchange notified the Securities and Exchange
Commission on Form 25 regarding the removal from listing of
Beazer Homes USA Inc.'s 7.50% Tangible Equity Units under Section
12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                         About Beazer Homes

Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (NYSE: BZH) -- http://www.beazer.com/--
headquartered in Atlanta, is one of the country's 10 largest
single-family homebuilders with continuing operations in Arizona,
California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Nevada,
New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.  Beazer Homes is listed
on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "BZH."

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $2.03 billion in total
assets, $1.77 billion in total liabilities and $259 million in
total stockholders' equity.

                           *     *     *

Beazer carries a 'B-' issuer credit rating, with "negative"
outlook, from Standard & Poor's.

In June 2015, Moody's Investors Service upgraded Beazer Homes USA,
Inc.'s Corporate Family Rating to B3 from Caa1 and its Probability
of Default Rating to B3-PD from Caa1-PD.


BIRMINGHAM COAL: Amends List of 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc., filed on June 16, 2015, with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama an
amended list of creditors holding 20 largest unsecured claims,
disclosing:

   Creditor                    Nature of Claim   Amount of Claim
   --------                    ---------------   ---------------
State Lands Division           2012 - Advanced     $2,433,240
State Lands Division           Minimum Royalty
64 N. Union St.
Montgomery, AL 36131

Caterpillar Financial          2013 - 2015         $1,153,773
Services Corp.                 Financed equipment
P.O. Box 330339                repair
Nashville, TN 37203

State Lands Division           2015 - Royalty        $501,349
State Lands Division
64 N. Union St.
Montgomery, AL 36131

Regions Bank - Deepwater       2015 - Royalty        $311,980
Trust 2
Natural Resources
P.O. Box 10463
Birmingham, AL 35202

CANAM Coal Corp.               2015 - Intercompany   $271,945
320 - 23rd Ave SW              Advances/Mgt. Fees
Calgary, Alberta T2S 0J2
CANADA

Land Energy, Ltd.              2015 - Royalties      $218,163

State Lands Division           2011 - Advanced       $208,560
                               Minimum Royalty

BTW Enterprises                2015 - Royalty        $164,068

Komatsu Financial Limited      2015 - Financed       $123,441
Partnership                    equipment repair

Komatsu Financial Limited      2015 - Financed        $70,982
Partnership                    equipment repair

State Lands Division           2012 - Advanced        $64,528
                               minimum Royalty

Komatsu Financial Limited      2015 - Financed        $48,419
Partnership                    equipment repair

MisDeb Coal LLC                2015 - Royalties       $45,254

Resolute Forest Products       2015 - Coal            $42,671
                               purchases

Yellowhammer Development       2015 - Royalties       $43,532

Bobby Knight                   2015 - Royalties       $41,136

Robert Lewis                   Wages                  $40,208

Thomas Lewis                   Wages                  $40,208

Sealy Enterprises              2015 - Trucking        $28,502

Komatsu Financial Limited      2015 - Financed        $19,957
Partnership                    equipment repair

In a notice of deficient filing, the Court related that the filer,
Clyde Ellis Brazeal, counsel for the Debtor, has amended the list
of 20 largest unsecured creditors and included the document with
the schedules and also included the Corporate Ownership Statement
in the schedules.  The Court said that to resolve the problem, the
filer must docket both documents as separate docket events as an
Amended List of 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors and Corporate Parent
Disclosure Statement.

                       About Birmingham Coal

Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc. produces and markets coal to
industrial, utility and export markets. It owns and operates three
coal mines with an average annual coal production of approximately
480,000 tons.  The company also offers coal brokerage services.
Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc. was founded in 2000 and is
based in Birmingham, Alabama.  As of May 9, 2011, Birmingham Coal
operates as a subsidiary of CanAm Coal Corp.

On May 27, 2015, Birmingham Coal and affiliates Cahaba Contracting
& Reclamation LLC, and RAC Mining LLC each filed a voluntary
petition for Chapter 11 reorganization (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Lead Case
No. 15-02075) in Birmingham, Alabama.

The Debtors tapped Jones Walker LLP as counsel.

Birmingham Coal and Cahaba Contracting each estimated $10 million
to $50 million in assets and debt. RAC Mining estimated $1 million
to $10 million in assets and debt.



BIRMINGHAM COAL: Aug. 3 Fixed as General Claims Bar Date
--------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Tamara O. Mitchell of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Alabama established these deadlines in
relation to the Chapter 11 case of Birmingham Coal & Coke Co.,
Inc.:

   * General Claims Bar Date: Aug. 3, 2015
   * Governmental Units Bar Date: Sept. 3, 2015

The Bankruptcy Administrator requested for an order setting the bar
date for filing claims.

                       About Birmingham Coal

Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc. produces and markets coal to
industrial, utility and export markets. It owns and operates three
coal mines with an average annual coal production of approximately
480,000 tons.  The company also offers coal brokerage services.
Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc. was founded in 2000 and is
based in Birmingham, Alabama.  As of May 9, 2011, Birmingham Coal
operates as a subsidiary of CanAm Coal Corp.

On May 27, 2015, Birmingham Coal and affiliates Cahaba Contracting
& Reclamation LLC, and RAC Mining LLC each filed a voluntary
petition for Chapter 11 reorganization (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Lead Case
No. 15-02075) in Birmingham, Alabama.

The Debtors tapped Jones Walker LLP as counsel.

Birmingham Coal and Cahaba Contracting each estimated $10 million
to $50 million in assets and debt. RAC Mining estimated $1 million
to $10 million in assets and debt.



BIRMINGHAM COAL: Consolidated Creditors Committee Ordered
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama
directed J. Thomas Corbett, Bankruptcy Administrator, to appoint
one consolidated unsecured creditors' committee in the jointly
administered cases of Birmingham Coal & Coke Co., Inc., et al.

The Bankruptcy Administrator, in his report, stated that on
May 28, 2015, he solicited for participation on a Committee of
Unsecured Creditors in each of these cases:

   a. Cahaba Contracting & Reclamation, LLC;
   b. RAC Mining, LLC; and
   c. Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc.

In the Birmingham Coal case, the Bankruptcy Administrator received
four timely responses indicating a willingness to serve on an
unsecured creditors' committee.  Of the four affirmative responses,
two (State of Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural
Resources and the Alabama Surface Mining Commission) appear to be
creditors that are "governmental units" as defined by Section
101(27) of the Bankruptcy Code.  The Alabama Department of
Conservation and Natural Resources and the Alabama Surface Mining
Commission appear to not qualify for participation on a committee
of unsecured creditors based on Sections 1102(b)(1) and 101(41) of
the Bankruptcy Code.  The Bankruptcy Administrator has determined
that while the two remaining affirmative response creditors
qualify, a committee of only two is unadvisable.  Accordingly, the
Bankruptcy Administrator recommended that a committee of unsecured
creditors not be appointed in Birmingham Coal.

                       About Birmingham Coal

Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc. produces and markets coal to
industrial, utility and export markets. It owns and operates three
coal mines with an average annual coal production of approximately
480,000 tons.  The company also offers coal brokerage services.
Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc. was founded in 2000 and is
based in Birmingham, Alabama.  As of May 9, 2011, Birmingham Coal
operates as a subsidiary of CanAm Coal Corp.

On May 27, 2015, Birmingham Coal and affiliates Cahaba Contracting
& Reclamation LLC, and RAC Mining LLC each filed a voluntary
petition for Chapter 11 reorganization (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Lead Case
No. 15-02075) in Birmingham, Alabama.

The Debtors tapped Jones Walker LLP as counsel.

Birmingham Coal and Cahaba Contracting each estimated $10 million
to $50 million in assets and debt. RAC Mining estimated $1 million
to $10 million in assets and debt.



BIRMINGHAM COAL: Files Schedules of Assets and Liabilities
----------------------------------------------------------
Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc., filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama its schedules
of assets and liabilities, disclosing:

     Name of Schedule              Assets         Liabilities
     ----------------            -----------      -----------
  A. Real Property                        $0
  B. Personal Property            $7,903,024
  C. Property Claimed as
     Exempt
  D. Creditors Holding
     Secured Claims                               $17,293,367
  E. Creditors Holding
     Unsecured Priority
     Claims                                           $88,108
  F. Creditors Holding
     Unsecured Non-Priority
     Claims                                        $5,929,538
                                 -----------      -----------
        Total                     $7,903,024      $23,311,013

A copy of the schedules is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/BIRMINGHAMCOAL_74_sal.pdf

                       About Birmingham Coal

Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc., produces and markets coal to
industrial, utility and export markets. It owns and operates three
coal mines with an average annual coal production of approximately
480,000 tons.  The company also offers coal brokerage services.
Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc. was founded in 2000 and is
based in Birmingham, Alabama.  As of May 9, 2011, Birmingham Coal
operates as a subsidiary of CanAm Coal Corp.

On May 27, 2015, Birmingham Coal and affiliates Cahaba Contracting
& Reclamation LLC, and RAC Mining LLC each filed a voluntary
petition for Chapter 11 reorganization (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Lead Case
No. 15-02075) in Birmingham, Alabama.

The Debtors tapped Jones Walker LLP as counsel.

Birmingham Coal and Cahaba Contracting each estimated $10 million
to $50 million in assets and debt.  RAC Mining estimated $1 million
to $10 million in assets and debt.


BIRMINGHAM COAL: Has Authority to Use Cash until September 4
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Tamara O. Mitchell of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
Northern District of Alabama issued a second interim Order
authorizing Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc., et al., to use
cash collateral of Regions Bank, Regions Equipment Finance
Corporation and Regions Commercial Equipment Finance, LLC, until
September 4, 2015.

Pursuant to the Second Interim Order, the Debtors may use cash
collateral for: (i) general working capital purposes and general
corporate purposes relating to the postpetition operations; and
(ii) payment of the costs and expenses associated with these
chapter 11 cases, all in accordance with the terms of a proposed
budget.  

The Official Consolidated Unsecured Creditors' Committee objected
to the cash collateral order, saying it has not had the opportunity
to review the documentation of Regions Bank's loans, perfection of
security related thereto, the onset of the indebtedness and
specifically the inclusion of a pre-payment penalty in the amount
of $368,339 included in its claimed indebtedness.

The Committee also objects to the provisions in the Cash Collateral
Order providing a replacement lien, to the extent that the lien
given to Regions Bank is superior to that of any professional fees
of the Committee.  Likewise, the Committee objects to the Cash
Collateral Order, which provides a Superpriority claim to Regions
Bank which would be superior to any professional fees of the
Committee.

Moreover, the Committee objects to the provisions in the Cash
Collateral Order providing a replacement lien to the extent that
the lien given to Regions Bank is superior to that of any
professional fees of the Committee and objects to paragraph
11(a)(iv) of the Cash Collateral Order which provides that a
conversion or dismissal of one of the case would result in a
termination of the terms of the Order.

A final hearing will be held on September 2, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.

Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc. is represented by:
          
          Eric Hallmark, Esq.
          912 Edenton Street
          Birmingham, Alabama 35242
          Email: ehallmark@canamcoal.com

Regions Bank is represented by:

          N. Ronald Downey, III, Esq.
          1901 6th Avenue N.
          19th Floor
          Birmingham, Alabama 35203
          Email: ron.downey@regions.com

The Committee is represented by:

          Marvin E. Franklin, Esq.
          Charles Denburg, Esq.
          Najjar Denaburg, P.C.
          2125 Morris Avenue
          Birmingham, Alabama 35203
          Tel.: 203 250-8400
          Email: cdenaburg@najjar.com
                                                                  

                         About Birmingham Coal

Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc. produces and markets coal to
industrial, utility and export markets. It owns and operates three
coal mines with an average annual coal production of approximately
480,000 tons.  The company also offers coal brokerage services.

Birmingham Coal & Coke Company, Inc. was founded in 2000 and is
based in Birmingham, Alabama.  As of May 9, 2011, Birmingham Coal
operates as a subsidiary of CanAm Coal Corp.

On May 27, 2015, Birmingham Coal and affiliates Cahaba Contracting
& Reclamation LLC, and RAC Mining LLC each filed a voluntary
petition for Chapter 11 reorganization (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Lead Case
No. 15-02075) in Birmingham, Alabama.

The Debtors tapped Jones Walker LLP as counsel.

Birmingham Coal and Cahaba Contracting each estimated $10 million
to $50 million in assets and debt. RAC Mining estimated $1 million
to $10 million in assets and debt.


BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE: Reports Preliminary Results for 2nd Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Builders FirstSource, Inc., reported its preliminary results for
the second quarter ended June 30, 2015.

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded net
income of $3.5 million on $461.5 million of sales for the three
months ended June 30, 2015, compared to net income of $10.6 million
on $426.5 million of sales for the same period in 2014.

The Company reported a net loss of $3.5 million on $832.5 million
of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to net
income of $7.2 million on $772.4 million of sales for the same
period last year.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $662.3 million in total
assets, $614.2 million in total liabilities and $48.1 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Total liquidity at June 30, 2015, was $143.8 million, including
$40.2 million of cash and $103.6 million in borrowing availability
under the Company's revolver.  The Company had $55.0 million in
outstanding borrowings and $16.4 million in outstanding letters of
credit under the revolver as of June 30, 2015.

Operating cash flow was $7.7 million for the second quarter of
2015, compared to negative $13.1 million in the second quarter of
2014, the difference largely due to higher working capital build in
the second quarter of 2014.

Capital expenditures were $5.2 million for the second quarter of
2015, compared to $6.8 million for the second quarter of 2014.

On April 13, 2015, the Company announced that it had entered into a
definitive purchase agreement to acquire ProBuild Holdings, LLC.

                     About Builders FirstSource

Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Builders FirstSource --
http://www.bldr.com/-- is a supplier and manufacturer of
structural and related building products for residential new
construction.  The Company operates 56 distribution centers and 56
manufacturing facilities in nine states, principally in the
southern and eastern United States. Manufacturing facilities
include plants that manufacture roof and floor trusses, wall
panels, stairs, aluminum and vinyl windows, custom millwork and
pre-hung doors.  Builders FirstSource also distributes windows,
interior and exterior doors, dimensional lumber and lumber sheet
goods, millwork and other building products.

Builders Firstsource reported net income of $18.2 million on $1.60
billion of sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared to a
net loss of $42.7 million on $1.48 billion of sales in 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $625 million in total assets,
$591 million in total liabilities, and $34 million in total
stockholders' equity.

                           *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on July 15, 2015, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services said it raised its corporate credit rating on Builders
FirstSource Inc. to 'B+' from 'B'.  

In the May 13, 2014, edition of the TCR, Moody's Investors Service
upgraded Builders FirstSource's Corporate Family Rating to 'B3'
from 'Caa1'.  The upgrade reflects Moody's expectation that BLDR's
operating performance will continue to benefit from improved
housing construction, repair and remodeling.


BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE: Reports Second Quarter 2015 Results
---------------------------------------------------------
Builders FirstSource, Inc., reported net income of $3.6 million on
$461.5 million of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2015,
compared to net income of $10.6 million on $426.5 million of sales
for the same period in 2014.

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company reported a net
loss of $3.5 million on $832.5 million of sales compared to net
income of $7.2 million on $772.4 million of sales for the same
period last year.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $662.3 million in total
assets, $614.2 million in total liabilities and $48.1 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Commenting on the company's results, Builders FirstSource CEO Floyd
Sherman said, "I am extremely pleased with the performance of our
company this quarter.  We increased our revenues by 8.2 percent
despite the negative year-over-year impact from commodity deflation
and the abnormally wet weather conditions during the quarter.  Our
gross profit margin of 24.0 percent was the highest it's been since
the third quarter of 2007, and our Adjusted EBITDA of $27.6 million
represented our highest quarterly Adjusted EBITDA result since the
third quarter of 2006, when annualized single family starts were
above 1.3 million.  These results reinforce our belief that we are
continuing to benefit from a strengthening housing market and that
Builders FirstSource is well positioned."

Chad Crow, Builders FirstSource president, COO and CFO, added, "We
made significant strides in improving our profitability this
quarter.  The company demonstrated strong operating leverage with
Adjusted EBITDA flow through on incremental sales of 20.8 percent,
resulting in our best quarterly Adjusted EBITDA margin in eight
years.  We believe further operating leverage is possible with
continued improvement in the housing market and our increased scale
following our acquisition of ProBuild."

A copy of the press release is available at:

                       http://is.gd/fQRiFq

                    About Builders FirstSource

Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Builders FirstSource --
http://www.bldr.com/-- is a supplier and manufacturer of
structural and related building products for residential new
construction.  The Company operates 56 distribution centers and 56
manufacturing facilities in nine states, principally in the
southern and eastern United States. Manufacturing facilities
include plants that manufacture roof and floor trusses, wall
panels, stairs, aluminum and vinyl windows, custom millwork and
pre-hung doors.  Builders FirstSource also distributes windows,
interior and exterior doors, dimensional lumber and lumber sheet
goods, millwork and other building products.

Builders Firstsource reported net income of $18.2 million on $1.60
billion of sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared to a
net loss of $42.7 million on $1.48 billion of sales in 2013.

                           *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on May 15, 2013, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services Inc. said it raised its corporate credit rating on
Dallas-based Builders FirstSource to 'B' from 'CCC'.  "The upgrade
acknowledges U.S.-based building materials manufacturer and
distributor Builders FirstSource's 'strong' liquidity based on the
company's proposed recapitalization," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst James Fielding.

In the May 13, 2014, edition of the TCR, Moody's Investors Service
upgraded Builders FirstSource's Corporate Family Rating to 'B3'
from 'Caa1'.  The upgrade reflects Moody's expectation that BLDR's
operating performance will continue to benefit from improved
housing construction, repair and remodeling.


CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Adversary Suits Against CEC to Continue
--------------------------------------------------------------
A bankruptcy court judge ruled against enjoining lawsuits filed
against Caesars Entertainment Corporation in New York and Delaware,
and accordingly the Lawsuits will continue against CEC.  CEC
believes the claims asserted in Lawsuits are without merit and will
continue to vigorously defend against those claims.

In March, Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. and its
affiliated debtor entities filed an adversary action against
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, Meehancombs Global Credit
Opportunities Master Fund, LP, Relative Value-Long/Short Debt
Portfolio, A Series of Underlying Funds Trust, SB 4 CF LLC, CFIP
Ultra Master Fund, Ltd., Trilogy Portfolio Company, LLC, Frederick
Barton Danner, and BOKF, N.A. requesting that the Bankruptcy Court
enjoin the Adversaries from continuing to pursue pending claims
against CEC.

                     About Caesars Entertainment

Caesars Entertainment Corp., formerly Harrah's Entertainment Inc.,
is one of the world's largest casino companies.  Caesars casino
resorts operate under the Caesars, Bally's, Flamingo, Grand
Casinos, Hilton and Paris brand names.  The Company has its
corporate headquarters in Las Vegas.  Harrah's announced its
re-branding to Caesar's in mid-November 2010.

In January 2015, Caesars Entertainment and subsidiary Caesars
Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., announced that holders of
more than 60% of claims in respect of CEOC's 11.25% senior secured
notes due 2017, CEOC's 8.5% senior secured notes due 2020 and
CEOC's 9% senior secured notes due 2020 have signed the Amended
and Restated Restructuring Support and Forbearance Agreement,
dated as of Dec. 31, 2014, among Caesars Entertainment, CEOC and
the Consenting Creditors.  As a result, The RSA became effective
pursuant to its terms as of Jan. 9, 2015.

Appaloosa Investment Limited, et al., owed $41 million on account
of 10% second lien notes in the company, filed an involuntary
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition against CEOC (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 15-10047) on Jan. 12, 2015.  The bondholders are represented
by Robert S. Brady, Esq., at Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor
LLP.

CEOC and 172 other affiliates -- operators of 38 gaming and resort
properties in 14 U.S. states and 5 countries -- filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bank. N.D. Ill.  Lead Case No. 15-01145) on
Jan. 15, 2015.  CEOC disclosed total assets of $12.3 billion and
total debt of $19.8 billion as of Sept. 30, 2014.

Delaware Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross entered a ruling that the
bankruptcy proceedings will proceed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois.

Kirkland & Ellis serves as the Debtors' counsel.  AlixPartners is
the Debtors' restructuring advisors.  Prime Clerk LLC acts as the
Debtors' notice and claims agent.  Judge Benjamin Goldgar presides
over the cases.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed seven noteholders to serve in the
Official Committee of Second Priority Noteholders and nine members
to serve in the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee.

The U.S. Trustee appointed Richard S. Davis as Chapter 11
examiner.

                         *     *     *

The Troubled Company Reporter, on April 27, 2015, reported that
Fitch Ratings has affirmed and withdrawn the Issuer Default
Ratings (IDR) and issue ratings of Caesars Entertainment Operating
Company (CEOC).  These actions follow CEOC's Chapter 11 filing on
Jan. 15, 2015.  Accordingly, Fitch will no longer provide ratings
or analytical coverage for CEOC.

In addition, Fitch has affirmed the IDR and issue rating of
Chester Downs and Marina LLC (Chester Downs) and the ratings have
been simultaneously withdrawn for business reasons.


CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Noteholders' Suit v. Parent Can Proceed
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge A. Benjamin Goldgar in Chicago denied the motion
of the debtors Caesars Entertainment Operating Co., Inc. and more
than 170 of its subsidiaries for a preliminary injunction under
section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, to halt four civil actions
against CEOC's non-debtor parent, Caesars Entertainment Corp. in
other courts.

The actions arise out of nearly $4.6 billion in second lien and
senior unsecured notes that CEOC issued and CEC guaranteed. The
plaintiffs in the four actions -- indenture trustees and holders of
the notes -- brought the actions after CEC claimed that two 2014
transactions involving CEC had released the guarantees.   Those
plaintiffs include (1) Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB; (2)
BOKF, N.A.; (3) MeehanCombs Global Credit Opportunities Master
Fund, LP; Relative Value-Long/Short Debt Portfolio, a Series of
Underlying Funds Trust; SB 4 CF LLC; CFIP Ultra Master Fund, Ltd.;
and Trilogy Portfolio Co., LLC; and (4) Frederick Barton Danner, as
representative of a plaintiff class.

The actions seek damages from CEC for breach of contract (among
other things) as well as declaratory judgments that the guarantees
are still in effect. The debtors contend the actions should be
enjoined because their prosecution threatens the success of the
debtors' chapter 11 cases.

MeehanCombs et al. opposed the debtors' request.

Judge Goldgar said the debtors have not shown they are entitled to
the injunctive relief they request.

The adversary case is, CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING CO., INC.,
et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOKF, N.A., et al., Defendants, No. 15 A 149
(Bankr. N.D. Ill.).  A copy of Judge Goldgar's July 22, 2015
Memorandum Opinion is available at http://is.gd/5B9u4mfrom
Leagle.com.

                           *     *     *

Reuters and CNBC report that Judge Goldgar's July 22 ruling caused
Caesars Entertainment's shares to briefly plunged about 60% that
day -- to a low of $3.30.  Following its initial dip after the
ruling, the Company's stock pared some of those losses to a price
above $5 (still a more than 30% loss on the day).

Reuters and CNBC say the creditor lawsuits claim up to $11 billion.
The report noted that Caesars has said it may join its operating
unit in bankruptcy if those lawsuits were not put on hold.

                    About Caesars Entertainment

Caesars Entertainment Corp., formerly Harrah's Entertainment Inc.,
is one of the world's largest casino companies.  Caesars casino
resorts operate under the Caesars, Bally's, Flamingo, Grand
Casinos, Hilton and Paris brand names.  The Company has its
corporate headquarters in Las Vegas.  Harrah's announced its
re-branding to Caesar's in mid-November 2010.

In January 2015, Caesars Entertainment and subsidiary Caesars
Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., announced that holders of
more than 60% of claims in respect of CEOC's 11.25% senior secured
notes due 2017, CEOC's 8.5% senior secured notes due 2020 and
CEOC's 9% senior secured notes due 2020 have signed the Amended
and Restated Restructuring Support and Forbearance Agreement,
dated as of Dec. 31, 2014, among Caesars Entertainment, CEOC and
the
Consenting Creditors.  As a result, The RSA became effective
pursuant to its terms as of Jan. 9, 2015.

Appaloosa Investment Limited, et al., owed $41 million on account
of 10% second lien notes in the company, filed an involuntary
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition against CEOC (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 15-10047) on Jan. 12, 2015.  The bondholders are represented
by Robert S. Brady, Esq., at Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor
LLP.

CEOC and 172 other affiliates -- operators of 38 gaming and resort
properties in 14 U.S. states and 5 countries -- filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bank. N.D. Ill.  Lead Case No. 15-01145) on
Jan. 15, 2015.  CEOC disclosed total assets of $12.3 billion and
total debt of $19.8 billion as of Sept. 30, 2014.

Delaware Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross entered a ruling that the
bankruptcy proceedings will proceed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois.

Kirkland & Ellis serves as the Debtors' counsel.  AlixPartners is
the Debtors' restructuring advisors.  Prime Clerk LLC acts as the
Debtors' notice and claims agent.  Judge Benjamin Goldgar presides
over the cases.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed seven noteholders to serve in the
Official Committee of Second Priority Noteholders and nine members
to serve in the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee.

The U.S. Trustee appointed Richard S. Davis as Chapter 11
examiner.

                         *     *     *

The Troubled Company Reporter, on April 27, 2015, reported that
Fitch Ratings has affirmed and withdrawn the Issuer Default
Ratings (IDR) and issue ratings of Caesars Entertainment Operating
Company (CEOC).  These actions follow CEOC's Chapter 11 filing on
Jan. 15, 2015.  Accordingly, Fitch will no longer provide ratings
or analytical coverage for CEOC.

In addition, Fitch has affirmed the IDR and issue rating of
Chester Downs and Marina LLC (Chester Downs) and the ratings have
been simultaneously withdrawn for business reasons.


CAL DIVE: Suspends Filing of Reports with SEC
---------------------------------------------
Cal Dive International, Inc. has suspended its reporting
obligations under Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, by filing a Form 15 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on July 24, 2015.

                           About Cal Dive

Houston, Texas-based marine contractor Cal Dive International,
Inc., provides manned diving, pipelay and pipe burial, platform
installation and salvage, and light well intervention services to
the offshore oil and natural gas industry on the Gulf of Mexico
OCS, Northeastern U.S., Latin America, Southeast Asia, China,
Australia, West Africa, the Middle East, and Europe.  Cal Dive and
its U.S. subsidiaries filed simultaneous voluntary petitions
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-10458) on March 3, 2015.

Through the Chapter 11 process, the Company intends to sell non-
core assets and intends to reorganize or sell as a going concern
its core subsea contracting business.

Cal Dive disclosed total assets of $571 million and total debt of
$411 million as of Sept. 30, 2015.

The Debtors tapped Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., as counsel,
O'Melveny & Myers LLP, as co-counsel; Jones Walker Jones Walker
LLP as corporate counsel; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants, LLC, as
claims and noticing agent.  The Debtors also tapped Carl Marks
Advisory Group LLC as crisis managers and appoint F. Duffield
Meyercord as chief restructuring officer.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 formed a five-member committee of
unsecured creditors in the case.  The Committee retained Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Pepper Hamilton LLP as co-counsel;
and Guggenheim Securities, LLC as exclusive investment banker.

Cal Dive Offshore Contractors, Inc., disclosed total assets of
$233,273,806 and $311,339,932 in liabilities as of the Chapter 11
filing.



CASCADE AG: Emerald Partners' Bid to Withdraw Reference Granted
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge John C. Coughenour of the United States District Court for
the Western District of Washington, Seattle, granted Emerald
Partners, LLC, et al.'s motion to withdraw reference from
bankruptcy court of the case captioned VIRGINIA A. BURDETTE,
Plaintiff, v. EMERALD PARTNERS LLC, et al., Defendants, CASE NO.
C15-0816-JCC (W.D. Wash.).

In February 2015, Virginia A. Burdette, the Chapter 7 Trustee for
Cascade Ag Services, Inc., filed an adversary proceeding against
the defendants in Bankruptcy Court alleging: (1) declaratory
judgment; (2) breach of joint venture agreement; (3) breach of
partnership agreement; (4) breach of cop share agreement; (5)
fraudulent transfer; (6) improper post-petition transfer; (7)
unjust enrichment; and (8) constructive trust. On April 24, 2015,
the defendants filed a Motion to Withdraw the Reference.

Judge Coughenour found the withdrawal of the reference to be
warranted because non-core claims predominate the complaint. It
appeared that the parties agreed that the claims, except those for
fraudulent transfer and improper post-petition transfer, were
non-core.  The Defendants' demand for a jury trial also favored
hearing the case in district court, Judge Coughenour ruled.

A full-text copy of Judge Coughenour's July 16, 2015 order is
available at http://is.gd/ls9m7Ifrom Leagle.com.

Virginia A. Burdette is represented by:

          Kevin Arnold Bay, Esq.
          Paul W Moomaw, Esq.
          TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC
          1700 Seventh Avenue, Ste 2200
          Seattle, WA  98101-4416
          Tel: (206) 682-5600
          Fax: (206) 682-2992
          Email: kbay@tousley.com
                 pmoomaw@tousley.com

Emerald Partners LLC, Melanie S. Bruch, Christopher H. Sheafe, R.
Keith Storey, and Nancy C. Storey are represented by:
          
          Danial D Pharris, Esq.
          LASHER HOLZAPFEL SPERRY & EBBERSON, PLLC
          601 Union St., Suite 2600
          Seattle, WA 98101-4000
          Tel: (206) 624-1230
          Fax: (206) 340-2563
          Email: pharris@lasher.com

                         About Cascade AG

Cascade AG Services, Inc., dba Pleasant Valley Farms, fdba
Mountain View Produce, Inc., fdba Staffanson Harvesting LLC, fdba
Sterling Investment Group, L.L.C., is a vegetable processing
company that processes Washington-grown cucumbers and cabbage into
pickles and sauerkraut.

Cascade AG filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case
No. 12-18366) on Aug. 13, 2012.  In amended schedules, the Debtor
disclosed $25,522,648 in assets and $21,354,742 in liabilities as
of the Chapter 11 filing.

Lawyers at Cairncross & Hempelmann PS, in Seattle, serve as the
Debtor's counsel.  Clyde A. Hamstreet & Associates, LLC, is the
Debtor's chief restructuring officer and financial advisor.  The
petition was signed by Craig Staffanson, president.

The U.S. Trustee appointed seven creditors to the Official
Unsecured Creditors' Committee.  Lawrence R. Ream, Esq., at
Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC, Seattle, represents the Committee
as counsel.

DIP lender One PacificCoast Bank, FSB, is represented by Brad T.
Summers, Esq., and David W. Criswell, Esq.

The Plan filed in the Debtor's case contemplates a $3.0 million
capital infusion.  Money contributed to fund the Plan will be used
to satisfy Administrative Expense Claims to the extent that those
Claims must be satisfied for Confirmation, unless there is
agreement with Holders of Administrative Expense Claims to defer
payment.


CATASYS INC: Enters Into $3.3 Million Note with Crede CG
--------------------------------------------------------
Catasys, Inc., entered into a promissory note with Crede CG III,
Ltd., an affiliate of the Company's chairman and chief executive
officer, pursuant to which the Company received gross proceeds of
$3.35 million from Crede for the sale of $3.35 million in principal
amount.  

The Promissory Note is due on Aug. 21, 2015, and carries an
interest rate on any unpaid principal amount of 8% per annum until
the maturity date, after which the interest rate will increase to
12% per annum.  The closing of the Promissory Note occurred on July
22, 2015.  The Company and Crede are currently negotiating a longer
term financing.

The Company used approximately $2.2 million of the net proceeds of
this transaction to redeem its outstanding 12% Original Issue
Discount Convertible Debenture due Jan. 18, 2016, issued on
April 17, 2015.  Following that redemption, all of the Bridge Notes
are extinguished.  The remaining net proceeds will be used for
working capital.

                         About Catasys Inc.

Based in Los Angeles, California, Hythiam, Inc., n/k/a Catasys,
Inc., is a healthcare services management company, providing
through its Catasys(R) subsidiary specialized behavioral health
management services for substance abuse to health plans.

Catasys reported a loss of $27.3 million on $2.03 million of
healthcare services revenues for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2014,
compared to a loss of $4.67 million on $754,000 of healthcare
services revenues for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $1.33 million in total
assets, $41.8 million in total liabilities and a $40.4 million
total stockholders' deficit.

Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP, in Encino, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has continued
to incur significant operating losses and negative cash flows from
operations during the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.  These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


CHARLES EDWARD TAYLOR: Appeal of Brother's Ex-Wife Not Moot
-----------------------------------------------------------
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
concurred with the district court's findings that the appeal filed
by Patricia Caiarelli, and her attorneys, Madeline Gauthier and
Charles Kimbrough, was not moot, and that the bankruptcy court
abused its discretion by issuing the contempt order, damages order
and judgment.

In 2005, the brother of Debtor Charles Edward Taylor, II, died in a
boating accident.  Patricia Caiarelli, the decedent's ex-spouse and
guardian of their minor child, sought a declaration in Washington
state court that the child was entitled to assets of the decedent's
estate that were distributed to Taylor.  The state court entered
judgment against Taylor for over $1.4 million.  The decedent's
estate, which was named judgment creditor, assigned the judgment to
Caiarelli.  Taylor responded by seeking a declaration in probate
court that the assignment was void.  Prior to a resolution,
however, Taylor filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11.

While the Appellees' appeal was pending with the district court,
Charles Edward Taylor, II notified the district court that he
reached a settlement with Gauthier and Kimbrough's legal
malpractice insurance carrier, wherein he would receive $140,000 in
satisfaction for the judgment and, in turn, Taylor would file a
satisfaction and release of the judgment, along with a motion to
vacate all three orders challenged on appeal.  Gauthier and
Caiarelli denied that a full settlement had been reached.

Taylor alleges that the district court erred (1) by refusing to
dismiss the appeal as moot; (2) by determining that the
ratification order, regarding the assignment to Caiarelli of the
judgment against Taylor for over $1.4 million, did not violate the
statutory discharge and/or plan injunctions; and (3) by determining
that the ratification order did not constitute an impermissible
collateral attack on a federal judgment.

The Seventh Circuit, in finding that the district court correctly
determined that the appeal is not moot, held that the purported
settlement lacks the consent of all the parties.  Furthermore, it
does not negate the Appellee's stake in reversing the bankruptcy
court's dismissal order, and ultimately, the discharge injunction.
The Seventh Circuit says "a settlement offer must provide the
plaintiff with complete relief to render the case moot."  So long
as the discharge injunction remains in place, the purported
settlement provides only partial relief, and the underlying dispute
to which the challenged orders arose remains unsolved, the Seventh
Circuit held.

The Seventh Circuit also agreed with the district court when it
found that no violation of the statutory discharge or plan
injunctions occurred because the ratification motion did not seek
to collect, recover, prosecute or satisfy the judgment against
Taylor.  The Seventh Circuit says that the ratification order was
nothing more than a declaration that the assignment "is valid, and
has been valid since its original signing."

The Seventh Circuit ruled that the district court correctly
determined that the ratification order is not an impermissible
collateral attack on a federal judgment.  In its dismissal order,
the bankruptcy court held that Caiarelli presented insufficent
evidence to establish standing to enforce the judgment against
Taylor.  In contrast, when adjudicating the motion to ratify, the
probate court did not determine whether Caiarelli may enforce the
judgment against Taylor, or even when Caiarelli had standing to
make such an argument before the bankruptcy court. The probate
court issued a declaration as to the validity of the assignment --
and that is all.

The Case is IN RE: CHARLES EDWARD TAYLOR, II, Debtor-Appellant,
Case No, 14-3017 (7th Cir.).

A full-text copy of Judge Springmann's Decision, dated July 20,
2015 is available at http://is.gd/cPRxerfrom Leagle.com

Charles Taylor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. N.D. Ill.,

Case No. 12-16471) on April 23, 2012.


CHINA GINSENG: Closes $1.6 Million Purchase Agreement
-----------------------------------------------------
In connection with a security purchase agreement between China
Ginseng Holdings, Inc. and an investor, the Company closed a
private placement to sell a Series A Convertible Debenture for a
price of $1,600,000.  The Debenture is convertible into 4,000,000
shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.001 per share at
a price of $0.40 per share.  The Offering was made in reliance upon
the exemption from securities registration afforded by Regulation S
as promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

On the Closing, the Company issued a Convertible Debenture that is
convertible into 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock.  The Convertible
Debenture will, by its principal terms:

   (a) Carry no interest;

   (b) Mature on the 36 month anniversary of the Closing

   (c) Convert at any time after the issuance until the Maturity
       Date into shares of Common Stock at an initial conversion
       price of $0.40 per share, subject to adjustment pursuant to

       the terms of the Convertible Debenture; and

   (d) Carry a prepayment clause pursuant to which the Company may
       repurchase all or a portion of the outstanding Convertible
       Debenture in cash for 100% of the face value on 10 business
       days' notice at any time after the 12 month anniversary of
       the Closing; provided that the Investor shall have the
       right to convert the Convertible Debenture within five
       business days after written notice of such prepayment.

The proceeds of the Offering will be used for working capital and
general corporate purposes.

                       About China Ginseng

Changchun City, China-based China Ginseng Holdings, Inc., conducts
business through its four wholly-owned subsidiaries located in
China.  The Company has been granted 20-year land use rights to
3,705 acres of lands by the Chinese government for ginseng
planting and it controls, through lease, approximately 750 acres
of grape vineyards.  However, recent harvests of grapes showed
poor quality for wine production which indicates that the
vineyards are no longer suitable for planting grapes for wine
production.  Therefore, the Company has decided not to renew its
lease for the vineyards with the Chinese government upon
expiration in 2013 and, going forward, it intends to purchase
grapes from the open market in order to produce grape juice and
wine.

China Ginseng reported a net loss of $4.76 million on $2.61
million of revenue for the year ended June 30, 2014, compared to a
net loss of $3.64 million on $3.56 million of revenue for the year
ended June 30, 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $8.92 million in total
assets, $16.2 million in total liabilities, and a $7.24 million
total stockholders' deficit.

Cowan, Gunteski & Co., P.A., in Tinton Falls, NJ, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended June 30, 2014.  The independent auditors noted
that the Company has incurred an accumulated deficit of
$14.2 million since inception, has a working capital deficit of
$11.6 million, and there are existing uncertain conditions the
Company faces relative to its ability to obtain working capital
and operate successfully.  These conditions raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


CICERO INC: John Steffens Reports 67.5% Stake as of July 15
-----------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, John L. Steffens disclosed that as of July 15, 2015, he
beneficially owned 153,341,564 shares of common stock of
Cicero Inc., which represents 67.5 percent of the shares
outstanding.

This is the sixth amendment to the original Schedule 13D, which was
filed on July 13, 2007, and previously amended on Oct. 12, 2007, on
April 29, 2009, on Jan. 26, 2010, on April 25, 2013, and on April
15, 2015.

Since the Reporting Person last reported acquisitions of Shares,
Mr. Steffens entered into a Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement,
dated July 15, 2015, pursuant to which the Reporting Person
expended a total of $190,000 to acquire (i) 4,750,000 Shares, (ii)
16,625,000 warrants to purchase Shares with an exercise price of
$0.04 per Share, (iii) 14,777,778 warrants to purchase Shares with
an exercise price of $0.045 per Share, and (iv) 7,600,000 warrants
to purchase Shares with an exercise price of $0.05 per Share.
Those funds were provided from the Reporting Person's personal
funds.

"The Reporting Person acquired the securities of the Issuer based
on his belief that the securities, when acquired, were undervalued
and represented an attractive investment opportunity.  Depending
upon overall market conditions, other investment opportunities
available to the Reporting Person, and the availability of
securities of the Issuer at prices that would make the acquisition
of additional securities desirable, the Reporting Person may
endeavor to increase his position in the Issuer through, among
other things, the purchase of securities of the Issuer on the open
market or in private transactions or otherwise, on such terms and
at such times as the Reporting Person may deem advisable,"
according to the SEC filing.  

The Reporting Person is a member of the Board of Directors of the
Issuer.

A copy of the Schedule 13D/A is available at http://is.gd/9GWwcJ

                         About Cicero Inc.

Cary, N.C.-based Cicero, Inc., provides business integration
software solutions and also provides technical support, training
and consulting services as part of its commitment to providing
customers with industry-leading solutions.

The Company focuses on the customer experience management market
with emphasis on desktop integration and business process
automation with its Cicero XM(TM) products.  Cicero XM enables the
flow of data between different applications, regardless of the
type and source of the application, eliminating redundant entry
and costly mistakes.

The Company has extended the maturity dates of several debt
obligations that were due in 2011 to 2012, to assist with
liquidity and may attempt to extend these maturities again if
necessary.  Despite the recent additions of several new clients,
the Company continues to struggle to gain additional sources of
liquidity on terms that are acceptable to the Company.

Cicero reported a net loss applicable to common stockholders of
$4.05 million on $1.9 million of total operating revenue for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared to a net loss applicable to
common stockholders of $3.33 million on $2.19 million of total
operating revenue in 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $2.70 million in total
assets, $16.2 million in total liabilities and a $13.5 million
total stockholders' deficit.

Cherry Bekaert LLP, in Raleigh, North Carolina, issued a "going
concern" in its report on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has a working capital
deficiency as of Dec. 31, 2014.  These conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


CITI HELD 2015-PM1: Moody's Assigns (P)Ba3 Rating to Class C Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned provisional ratings to three
classes of notes to be issued by Citi Held for Asset Issuance
2015-PM1 (CHAI 2015-PM1). The collateral backing CHAI 2015-PM1
consists of unsecured consumer installment loans purchased by the
sponsor, CIGPF I Corp., a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of
Citigroup Inc. (long-term senior unsecured Baa1),from Prosper
Funding LLC (Prosper). The loans were originated and are serviced
through the online marketplace lending platform operated by Prosper
(unrated). Our cumulative net loss expectation for the CHAI
2015-PM1 loan pool is 8.0%.

Moody's issues provisional ratings in advance of the final sale of
securities. Upon a conclusive review of the final documentation,
Moody's will assign final ratings to the securities. Final ratings
may differ from provisional ratings.

The complete rating actions are as follows:

Issuer: Citi Held for Asset Issuance 2015-PM1

Class A Notes, Assigned (P)A3 (sf)

Class B Notes, Assigned (P)Baa3 (sf)

Class C Notes, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The provisional ratings assigned to the notes are based mainly on
the credit quality of the underlying consumer loan collateral, the
structural protections provided by various forms of credit
enhancement, the expertise of Prosper as servicer, and the
overhanging legal and regulatory risks facing the marketplace
lending model that relies on a third party bank partner to fund
loans.

The principal methodology used in this rating was "Moody's Approach
to Rating Consumer Loan-Backed ABS" published in January 2015.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the rating:

UP

Levels of credit protection that are higher than necessary to
protect investors against current expectations of loss could drive
the ratings up. Losses could decline from Moody's original
expectations as a result of a lower number of obligor defaults.
Transaction performance also depends greatly on the US job market.
Other reasons for better-than-expected performance include changes
to servicing practices that enhance collections or refinancing
opportunities that result in prepayments.

DOWN

Levels of credit protection that are insufficient to protect
investors against current expectations of loss could drive the
ratings down. Losses could rise above Moody's original expectations
as a result of a higher number of obligor defaults. Transaction
performance depends greatly on the US job market. Other reasons for
worse-than-expected performance include deficient servicing, error
on the part of transaction parties, inadequate transaction
governance and fraud.


COLDWATER CREEK: Action Removal Period Extended to Oct. 30
----------------------------------------------------------
The Liquidating Trustee of the CWC Creditors' Liquidating Trust
sought and obtained from Judge Brendan L. Shannon of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware extension of the
period where the Liquidating Trustee may remove actions to federal
district court to October 30, 2015.

Dennis A. Meloro, Esq., at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, in Wilmington,
Delaware, tells the Court that the extension of the removal period
will allow the Liquidating Trustee additional time (i) to work
through unresolved claims that relate to prepetition actions
without unnecessary litigation, and (ii) to investigate and make
informed decisions regarding prepetition actions.

The Liquidating Trustee of the CWC Creditors' Liquidating Trust is
represented by:

          Dennis A. Meloro, Esq.
          GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
          1007 North Orange Street, Suite 1200
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302)661-7395
          Facsimile: (302)661-7165
          Email: melorod@gtlaw.com

             -- and --

          James S. Carr, Esq.
          Dana P. Kane, Esq.
          KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP
          101 Park Avenue
          New York, NY 10178
          Telephone: (212)808-7800
          Facsimile: (212)808-7897
          Email: jcarr@kelleydrye.com  
                 dkane@kelleydrye.com

                         About Coldwater Creek

Coldwater Creek is a multi-channel retailer that offers its
merchandise through retail stores across the country, its catalog
and its e-commerce Web site, http://www.coldwatercreek.com/   

Originally founded in Sandpoint, Idaho in 1984 as a direct,
catalog-based marketer, Coldwater evolved into a multi-channel
specialty retailer operating 334 premium retail stores, 31 factory
outlet stores and seven day spa locations throughout the United
States.

As of the bankruptcy filing, the Debtors domestically employ a
total of approximately 5,990 employees throughout their retail
locations, corporate headquarters and distribution, design and
call
centers.

Coldwater Creek Inc. and its debtor-affiliates sought Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 14-10867) on
April 11, 2014, to liquidate their assets.

Coldwater Creek disclosed assets of $721 million plus undetermined
amount and liabilities of $425 million plus undetermined amount.
Affiliate Coldwater Creek U.S. Inc. estimated $100 million to $500
million in assets and liabilities.

The Debtors have drawn $37.5 million and have $10 million in
letters of credit outstanding under a senior secured credit
facility (ABL facility) provided by lenders led by Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as agent.  The Debtors also owe $96
million, which includes accrued interest and approximately $23
million representing a prepayment premium payable, under a term
loan from lenders led by CC Holding Agency Corporation, as agent.

Aside from the funded debt, the Debtors have accumulated a
significant amount of accrued and unpaid trade and other unsecured
debt in the normal course of their business.

The Debtors have tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, and
Shearman & Sterling LLP as attorneys, Perella Weinberg Partners LP
as financial advisor, Alvarez & Marsal as restructuring advisor,
and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region Three named seven creditors to serve
on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.  Lowenstein Sandler
LLP represents the Committee.

CWC Liquidation Inc., formerly known as Coldwater Creek Inc.,
notified the Bankruptcy Court that the effective date of its
Modified Third Amended Joint Plan of Liquidation occurred on Sept.
26, 2014.

The Troubled Company Reporter, on Dec. 29, 2014, reported that the
Bankruptcy Court entered a final decree closing the Chapter 11
cases of consolidated non-lead debtors in the cases of CWC
Liquidation Inc. formerly known as Coldwater Creek Inc, et al.


COMMERCE LLC: Dist. Court to Hear Trustee's Suit Against Chemence
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Senior District Judge William M. Nickerson granted the motion for
withdrawal of reference to the bankruptcy court of the adversary
proceeding captioned ZVI GUTTMAN, TRUSTEE, v. CHEMENCE, INC. et
al., BANKR. ADV. NO. 15-69-JFS, CIVIL NO. WMN-15-1294 (D. Md.).

On February 13, 2015, an adversary complaint was filed against
Chemence, Inc. and Chemence Medical Products, Inc. by Zvi Guttman,
Trustee for Commerce, LLC. The complaint included counts for
"Unjust Enrichment", "Constructive Trust", "Declaratory Relief",
and "Turnover" and alleged that Chemence knew that the $187,500.00
payment it received from Malcolm Cork came from Commerce, knew that
it had no business relationship with Commerce, and thus, knew that
it had no right to retain the wired funds. On April 15, 2015,
Chemence filed a motion for withdrawal of reference to the
bankruptcy court.

In granting the motion, Judge Nickerson held that cause exists for
withdrawal. He held that the action is clearly not a "core"
proceeding and there is nothing in the action calling for the
unique expertise of the bankruptcy court. He also added that
Chemence has the right to have the unjust enrichment claim resolved
by a jury.

A copy of the July 1, 2015 memorandum is available at
http://is.gd/nOD6D9from Leagle.com.

Chemence, Inc., and Chemence Medical Products, Inc., Appellants,
represented by Jan Ingham Berlage -- Jberlage@ghsllp.com -- Gohn
Hankey Stichel & Berlage, LLP & Ryan Notton -- RNotton@ghsllp.com
-- Gohn Hankey Stichel & Berlage, LLP.

Zvi Guttman, Trustee, Appellee, represented by Zvi Guttman --
zvi@zviguttman.com -- The Law Offices of Zvi Guttman PA.

                    About Commerce, LLC

On February 15, 2013, an involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition
was filed against Commerce, LLC (Bankr. D. Md. Case No.
13-12598-JFS) by its creditors. Zvi Guttman was the debtor's
Chapter 7 Trustee.


CORINTHIAN COLLEGES: Proposes to Sell Colorado Springs Assets
-------------------------------------------------------------
Corinthian Colleges, Inc., and its debtor affiliates seek authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for Delaware to sell the assets
located at its former call center in Colorado Springs, Colorado, to
Corporate Ridge Office, LLC.

The Purchase Price will be in the form of a credit bid of up to
$275,363 consisting of (i) a credit bid in the amount of $183,768
consisting of the estimated amount of the Purchaser's
administrative rent claim for amounts outstanding under the Lease
from the Petition Date through June 30, 2015; and (ii) a credit bid
in the amount of $91,884 consisting of the estimated amount of the
Purchaser's administrative rent claim under the Lease for the month
of July 2015.

The Assets include all personal property located at Colorado
Springs Location, including all furniture and equipment (including,
but not limited to, desks, chairs, tables, lighting fixtures, cable
and wiring, telecommunications equipment, projectors, whiteboards,
computer monitors, computer keyboards and personal computer
hardware.

The Debtors tell the Court that the proposed transaction is in the
best interests of their estates because, among other things, it
will allow the Debtors to exit the Colorado Springs Location so
that the Purchaser may re-let the premises.  This will benefit the
estates by reducing the amount of any rejection damages claim
against the Debtors' estates, Mark D. Collins, Esq., at Richards,
Layton & Finger, P.A., in Wilmington, Delaware, tells the Court.

Additionally, the sale to the Purchaser will facilitate a quick and
efficient disposition of the Assets since Debtors are no longer
operating and therefore have no further use for it, Mr. Collins
adds.

The Debtors ask the Court to set July 27, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. as
hearing date to consider approval of the Motion.  If no objections
to the motion are timely filed on the June 24 deadline, the
bankruptcy court may grant the relief requested in the motion
without further notice or hearing.

The Debtors are represented by:

          Mark D. Collins (No. 2981)
          Michael J. Merchant (No. 3854)
          Marisa A. Terranova (No. 5396)
          Amanda R. Steele (No. 5530)
          RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
          920 N. King Street
          Wilmington, Delaware 19801
          Telephone: 302-651-7700
          Facsimile: 302-651-7701
          Email: collins@rlf.com
                 merchant@rlf.com
                 terranova@rlf.com
                 steele@rlf.com

                    About Corinthian Colleges

Corinthian Colleges, Inc., Pegasus Education, Inc., and 23
affiliated entities filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D.
Del. Lead Case No. 15-10952) on May 4, 2015, to complete an
orderly wind down of its operations.  The cases are jointly
administered Case No. 15-10952.

Judge Kevin J. Carey presides over the case.  Richards, Layton &
Finger, P.A., represents the Debtors in their restructuring
efforts; FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as restructuring advisors;
and Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy serves as claims and noticing
agent.

Corinthian Colleges, Inc., disclosed $721,596,789 in assets and
$2,929,448,278 in liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed five creditors to serve on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.


CORPORATE RESOURCE: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor affiliates filing separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions:

      Debtor                                   Case No.
      ------                                   --------
      Corporate Resource Services, Inc.        15-11546
      160 Broadway, 13th Floor
      New York, NY 10038

      Accountabilities, Inc.                   15-11547
      Insurance Overload Services, Inc.        15-11548
      Integrated Consulting Services, Inc.     15-11549
      Corporate Resource Development, Inc.     15-11550
      The CRS Group, Inc.                      15-11551
      Diamond Staffing Services, Inc.          15-11552
      TS Staffing Services, Inc.               15-11553

Type of Business: CRS was a provider of employment and human
                  resource solutions for corporations.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 23, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware (Delaware)

Judge: Hon. Kevin J. Carey

Debtors' Counsel: Ronald S. Gellert, Esq.
                  Brya Keilson, Esq.
                  GELLERT SCALI BUSENKELL & BROWN, LLC
                  913 N. Market Street, 10th Floor
                  Wilmington, DE 19801
                  Tel: 302.425.5800
                  Fax: 302.425.5814
                  Email: rgellert@gsbblaw.com
                         bkeilson@gsbblaw.com

Debtors'          WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP
Special
Counsel:

Debtors'          CARTER LEDYARD & MILBURN LLP
Special
SEC Counsel:

Debtors'          SSG CAPITAL ADVISORS
Financial
Advisors and
Investment
Bankers:

Debtors'          RUST OMNI LLC
Claims
Agent:

Total Assets: $136,800 as of July 22, 2015

Total Debts: $45.4 million as of July 22, 2015

The petition was signed by Scott Victor, chief restructuring
officer.

List of Debtor's 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
TS Employment Inc.                     Vendor         $43,290,036
160 Broadway, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10038

Frank Vaccaro                         Employee           $750,000
c/o Lofaro & Reiser, LLP
Attn: Eric D. Reiser
20 Court Street, Suite 4
Hackensack, NJ 07601

Mark Levine                           Employee           $469,169
2881 NE 25th Court
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Carl Marks Advisory Group LLC           Vendor           $357,881
900 Third Avenue - 33rd Floor
New York, NY 10022 -4775

Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP            Vendor           $322,898
2 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005

NYC Department of Finance               Vendor           $320,276
PO Box 3929
New York, NY 10272-2030

Verizon Wireless                        Vendor           $156,599
PO Box 408
Newark, NJ 07101

Crowe Horwath LLP                       Vendor           $100,000

PA Department of Revenue                Vendor            $99,075

Delage Landen 634752                    Vendor            $98,141

Print Management Partners               Vendor            $92,476

Communications Advertising Inc.         Vendor            $80,686

Towle Denison Smith and                 Vendor            $76,851
Maniscalco LLP

Ellias & Ellias, P.C.                   Vendor            $75,478

NASDAQ (Stock Market LLC)               Vendor            $73,069

GE Capital                              Vendor            $66,129

Henry Ewen                             Employee           $57,247

Time Rack Inc.                          Vendor            $52,334

LEAF                                    Vendor            $48,273

Missouri Department of Revenue          Vendor            $45,576
Taxation Division  

Dept. of Homeland Security              Vendor            $43,750

AT&T                                    Vendor            $39,642

Integrated Screening Partners           Vendor            $36,243

Burns White LLC                         Vendor            $35,580

Kinsella, Weitzman, Iser, Kump          Vendor            $34,921
& Aldisert LLP

Office Depot                            Vendor            $33,826

Gage Consulting LLC                     Vendor            $33,333

Coler Consulting Group                  Vendor            $32,192

Makovsky                                Vendor            $32,145

Wholesale Screening Solutions           Vendor            $31,184


CROWN MEDIA: To Launch Hallmark Channel and Hallmark Movies
-----------------------------------------------------------
Crown Media Holdings, Inc., announced the launching of Hallmark
Channel and Hallmark Movies & Mysteries on AT&T U-verse TV.

"This agreement is a winning deal for AT&T U-verse customers," said
Bill Abbott, president & CEO, Crown Media Family Networks. "They
now have access to our two distinct channels and some of the best,
most compelling family entertainment on television.  We look
forward to a long and fruitful relationship with AT&T."

Hallmark Channel will be on channels 365 and 1365 in HD in the
U-family and U200 and above packages.  Hallmark Movies & Mysteries
will be on Channels 366 and 1366 in HD in the U-family and U300 and
above packages.  And in the next week, the channels will also be on
the U-verse App for tablets and smartphones and on Uverse.com.
With the U-verse App, customers will be able to catch live Hallmark
content on their mobile devices even when they're on the go.

"We are thrilled to work with Crown Media to bring Hallmark to our
U-verse TV customers," said Eric Boyer, senior vice president, AT&T
U-verse.  "Our customers will be able to watch the Hallmark
programming they love on U-verse TV, as well as on their mobile
devices with our U-verse App."

The agreement comes at a pivotal time in Crown Media's evolution.
Both networks are registering unprecedented growth.  Additionally,
both networks are rapidly expanding their lineup of original shows.
Hallmark Channel will feature a diverse and extensive slate of
original programs in 2015. The channel will offer 40 world premiere
movies, three original prime-time scripted series and three annual
pet-related specials.  Plus, Hallmark extended its daily lifestyle
series, Home & Family, to 52 weeks a year.

Starting Saturday, Oct. 31, Hallmark Channel's signature holiday
event, Countdown to Christmas, will feature an unprecedented lineup
of 16 original movies.  That includes five back-to-back nights of
world premiere originals over Thanksgiving weekend.

Hallmark Movies & Mysteries, formerly Hallmark Movie Channel, is
rolling out its biggest slate of new programs ever, with 17
original movies this year.  The channel will also offer fresh
installments of its Mystery Wheel franchises - Murder She Baked,
Gourmet Detective, Aurora Teagarden and Garage Sale Mystery.

Like Hallmark Channel, the network will also boost the lineup for
its holiday initiative, The Most Wonderful Movies of Christmas,
with five new original movies in 2015.

*AT&T products and services are provided or offered by subsidiaries
and affiliates of AT&T Inc. under the AT&T brand and not by AT&T
Inc.

                         About Crown Media

Crown Media Holdings, Inc., is the corporate parent for the
portfolio of cable networks and related businesses under Crown
Media Family Networks.  The company currently operates and
distributes Hallmark Channel in both high definition (HD) and
standard definition (SD) to 86 million subscribers in the U.S.
Hallmark Channel is the nation's leading destination for quality
family programming with an ambitious slate of TV movies and
specials; original scripted series, including Cedar Cove, When
Calls the Heart, and Signed, Sealed, Delivered; as well as some of
television's most beloved sitcoms and series.  Hallmark Channel's
sibling network, Hallmark Movie Channel, is available in 54
million homes in HD and SD. One of America's fastest-growing cable
networks, Hallmark Movie Channel provides family-friendly original
movies with a mix of original films, classic theatrical releases,
and presentations from the acclaimed Hallmark Hall of Fame
library.  In addition, Crown Media Family Networks includes the
online offerings of http://www.HallmarkChannel.com/and
http://www.HallmarkMovieChannel.com/

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $1.05 billion in total
assets, $541 million in total liabilities, and $512 million in
total stockholders' equity.

                           *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on July 3, 2015, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services said that it raised its corporate credit rating on Crown
Media Holdings Inc. to 'BB-' from 'B+'.  "The upgrade reflects
Crown Media's improved financial risk profile," said Standard &
Poor's credit analyst Naveen Sarma.

As reported by the TCR on July 2, 2014, Moody's Investors Service
upgraded the Corporate Family Rating (CFR) of Crown Media
Holdings, Inc. to B1 from B2, its Probability of Default Rating to
B1-PD from B2-PD, and instrument ratings as detailed below.  The
outlook is stable.  The upgrade incorporates evidence of traction
with the original programming strategy and better than expected
performance, which, combined with debt reduction, improved the
credit profile.


CRYOPORT INC: Amends 1.4 Million Units Prospectus with SEC
----------------------------------------------------------
Cryoport, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission an
amended Form S-1 registration statement relating to a firm
commitment public offering of 1,397,849 units.

Each unit consists of one share of the Company's common stock,
$0.001 par value, and one warrant to purchase one share of the
Company's common stock at an exercise price of 110% of the public
offering price of one unit in this offering.  The common stock and
warrants are immediately separable and will be issued separately.
The offering also includes the shares issuable from time to time
upon exercise of the warrants.

The Company's common stock is currently traded on the OTC Bulletin
Board under the symbol CYRX.  On May 19, 2015, the Company effected
a reverse stock split on a 12-to-1 basis.  On July 22, 2015, the
last reported sale price for the Company's common stock was $4.65
per share.  The Company received conditional approval to list its
common stock and warrants on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the
symbols "CYRX" and "CYRXW", respectively, subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions and meeting all of the NASDAQ
Capital Market listing standards on the date of this offering.
That listing, however, is not guaranteed.

A copy of the Form S-1/A is available at http://is.gd/RhTvOb

                          About Cryoport

Lake Forest, Calif.-based CryoPort, Inc. (OTC BB: CYRX) provides
comprehensive solutions for frozen cold chain logistics, primarily
in the life science industries.  Its solutions afford new and
reliable alternatives to currently existing products and services
utilized for bio-pharmaceuticals and biologics, including in-vitro
fertilization, cell lines, vaccines, tissue and other commodities
requiring a reliable frozen solution.

Cryoport reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$12.2 million for the year ended March 31, 2015, compared to a net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $19.6 million for the
year ended March 31, 2014.  As of March 31, 2015, Cryoport had $2.6
million in total assets, $3.02 million in total liabilities and a
$416,000 total stockholders' deficit.

KMJ Corbin & Company LLP, in Costa Mesa, California, issued a
"going concern" qualification on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended March 31, 2015, citing that the
Company has incurred recurring operating losses and has had
negative cash flows from operations since inception.  Although the
Company has cash and cash equivalents of $1.4 million at March 31,
2015, management has estimated that cash on hand, which include
proceeds from Class B convertible preferred stock received
subsequent to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, will only be
sufficient to allow the Company to continue its operations into the
third quarter of fiscal 2016.  These matters raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


DANA CORP: R.I. Super. Grants Partial Summary Judgment in "Bazor"
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Superior Court of Rhode Island, Providence, SC, ruled on the
plaintiffs' motion to compel jurisdictional discovery in the case
captioned ROBERT BAZOR and KAY BAZOR, Plaintiffs, v. ABEX CORP., et
al., Defendants, and MARTHANNE STEFANKO, Individually and as
Personal Representative of the Estate of KENNETH STEFANKO,
Plaintiffs, v. ADIENCE CO., L.P., et al. Defendants, and RONALD
BURDICK, as Executor of the Estate of WALTER BURDICK and Estate of
EVELYN BURDICK, Plaintiffs, v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., et al.
Defendants, and DENNIS R. BAUMGARTNER and GAIL L. BAUMGARTNER,
Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., et al., Defendants, and
BEVERLY TAYLOR, as Administrator of the Estate of ROBERT P. TAYLOR,
and Individually Recognized as Surviving Spouse, Plaintiffs, v.
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., et al., Defendants, and MARK COSTELLO and
THERESA COSTELLO, Plaintiffs, v. AGCO CORPORATION, Individually and
a Successor in interest to MASSEY FERGUSON and ALLIS CHALMERS, et
al., Defendants, and CAROL WINCHESTER and DANIEL WINCHESTER,
Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., et al., Defendants, C.A.
NOS. PC10-3965, PC11-2352, PC11-3431, PC13-4151, PC14-1464,
PC14-3741, PC14-4697 (R.I. Super.)

A suit was brought against Dana Companies, LLC, for injuries
arising out of exposure to asbestos, which were allegedly caused by
Dana Companies' asbestos-containing products.

On November 11, 2014, Dana Companies filed a Motion to Dismiss for
Lack of Personal Jurisdiction.  Subsequently, the plaintiffs served
a Notice of a 30(b)(6) Deposition directed to Dana Companies for
purposes of discovering facts that would allow them to establish
that the court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Dana
Companies.

The Plaintiffs later filed a motion, pursuant to Rule 37(a),
seeking an order compelling Dana Companies to "fully respond" to
their discovery items, arguing that Dana Companies has failed to
fully respond to its requests for jurisdictional discovery,
particularly information regarding Dana Corporation and Dana
Holding.  Dana Corporation is Dana Companies' corporate predecessor
while Dana Holding Corporation is Dana Companies' parent
corporation.

Dana Companies argued that plaintiffs' 37(a) motion to compel
should be denied because there is already sufficient evidence that
general personal jurisdiction is lacking, and that discovery
regarding Dana Corporation's and Dana Holding's contacts with Rhode
Island are irrelevant.

The Court granted the plaintiffs' motion in part, and denied it in
part.  It found that limited jurisdictional discovery is
appropriate as to any "substantial" or "continuous and systematic"
business contacts Dana Corporation may have had with Rhode Island.
However, the Court held that no additional discovery is necessary
regarding Dana Holding or Dana Companies.

A full-text copy of the July 16, 2015 memorandum opinion and order
is available at http://is.gd/pFpYVhfrom Leagle.com.

Plaintiff is represented by:

          Donnie E. Young, Esq.

             -- and –-

          Robert J. Sweeney, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT J SWEENEY
          55 W Franklin Suite 201
          Tucson, AZ 85701
          Tel: (520) 629-9896

             -- and –-

          Jeffrey S. Kanca, Esq.

Defendant is represented by:

          Lawrence G. Cetrulo, Esq.
          Two Seaport Lane 10th Floor
          Boston, MA  02210
          Tel: (617) 217-5210
          Fax: (617) 217-5200
          Email: lcetrulo@cetllp.com

             -- and –-

          Stephen T. Armato, Esq.
          Two Seaport Lane 10th Floor
          Boston, MA  0221
          Tel: (617) 217-5252
          Fax: (617) 217-5200
          Email: sarmato@cetllp.com

                         About Dana Corp.

Based in Toledo, Ohio, Dana Corporation designs and manufactures
products for every major vehicle producer in the world, and
supplies drivetrain, chassis, structural, and engine technologies
to those companies.  Dana employs 46,000 people in 28 countries.
Dana is focused on being an essential partner to automotive,
commercial, and off-highway vehicle customers, which collectively
produce more than 60 million vehicles annually.  Dana has
facilities in China in the Asia-Pacific, Argentina in the
Latin-American regions and Italy in Europe.

Dana Corp. and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection on
March 3, 2006 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 06-10354).  Corinne Ball,
Esq., and Richard H. Engman, Esq., at Jones Day, in Manhattan and
Heather Lennox, Esq., Jeffrey B. Ellman, Esq., Carl E. Black,
Esq., and Ryan T. Routh, Esq., at Jones Day in Cleveland, Ohio,
represented the Debtors.  Henry S. Miller at Miller Buckfire &
Co., LLC, served as the Debtors' financial advisor and investment
banker.  Ted Stenger from AlixPartners served as Dana's Chief
Restructuring Officer.  Thomas Moers Mayer, Esq., at Kramer Levin
Naftalis & Frankel LLP, represented the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors.  Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson,
LLP, served as counsel to the Official Committee of Equity
Security Holders.  Stahl Cowen Crowley, LLC, served as counsel to
the Official Committee of Non-Union Retirees.  The Debtors filed
their Joint Plan of Reorganization on Aug. 31, 2007.  Judge Burton
Lifland confirming the Plan, as thrice amended, on Dec. 26, 2007.
The Plan was declared effective Jan. 31, 2008.  Upon emergence,
the Company was renamed as Dana Holding Corporation.


DASEKE INC: S&P Retains B+ Issue Level Rating After Loan Revision
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said that its 'B+' issue-level
rating and '4' recovery rating on Daseke Inc.'s senior secured term
loan are unchanged following the company's revision of the terms of
the loan.  The new proposed $200 million senior secured term loan B
due 2020 is $50 million smaller than the previously proposed $250
million senior secured term loan B due 2022.  The '4' recovery
rating indicates S&P's expectation for average (30%-50%; lower half
of the range) recovery in the event of a default. S&P's 'B+'
corporate credit rating and stable outlook on Daseke Inc. also
remain unchanged.

S&P's ratings on Daseke reflect the company's participation in the
highly fragmented, cyclical, and capital-intensive trucking
industry.  Daseke provides open-deck, specialty trucking services
in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.  Over the next couple years, S&P
believes that Daseke's trucking volumes will grow gradually,
supported by moderate U.S. economic growth.  S&P's ratings also
reflect its assessment of the company's steady earnings growth and
S&P's belief that management's financial policies for disciplined,
accretive acquisitions will result in credit measures that are
commensurate with the rating.  S&P's financial risk profile
assessment on Daseke incorporates its expectation that the company
will generate moderate positive free operating cash flow (FOCF) in
2015 and 2016 and that its credit metrics will improve in 2015 and
2016, barring a large, debt-financed acquisition.

RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

S&P has completed a review of the recovery analysis and is
maintaining its recovery and issue-level ratings on Daseke Inc.'s
proposed $200 million senior secured term loan B due 2020.  S&P's
simulated default scenario assumes a default in the first half of
2019 because of a combination of the following factors: the loss of
major customers, rising interest rates, and lower economic
activity.  S&P expects these conditions to reduce Daseke's volumes,
revenues, margins, and net income, causing its liquidity and
operating cash flow to decline.

Based on the company's proposed capital structure and assumed
increase in borrowing costs, S&P estimates that the company's
EBITDA would need to decline to about $49 million to trigger a
payment default.  At this point, S&P forecasts that the company's
cash flow would be insufficient to cover its interest expense,
required debt amortization, and nondiscretionary maintenance
capital spending.  Other factors in our default scenario include:

   -- LIBOR increases to 300 basis points (bps);
   -- An amendment of the bank facilities' covenants results in a
      credit margin increase of 150 bps;
   -- The asset-based lending revolver is 60% drawn at default;
      and
   -- All debt includes six months of accrued interest.

Simulated default and valuation assumptions:
   -- Simulated year of default: 2019
   -- EBITDA at emergence: $63 million
   -- EBITDA multiple: 5x
Simplified waterfall:
   -- Net enterprise value (after 5% admin. costs): $299 million
   -- Valuation split (obligors/nonobligors): 100%/0%
   -- Priority claims: $174 million
   -- Total collateral value available to secured debt:
      $125 million
   -- Total 1st lien debt: $62 million
   -- Total collateral available to senior secured term loan:
      $63 million
   -- Recovery expectations: 30%-50% (lower end of range)

Note: All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.

RATINGS LIST

Ratings Unchanged
Daseke Inc.
Corporate Credit Rating                B+/Stable/--       
  $200 Mil. Snr Scrd Trm Ln B Due 2020  B+                 
   Recovery Rating                      4L                 



DEB STORES: Seeks Exclusive Plan Filing Pd. Extension Thru Dec. 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Deb Stores Holding LLC and its affiliated debtors ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to extend the periods
within which only they may file a plan of reorganization and obtain
acceptances of the plan of reorganization by a period of 120 days
each, or up to December 1, 2015 and January 28, 2016, respectively.


Peter J. Keane, Esq.,  at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware, clarifies that the Debtors are not seeking an
extension of time to pressure creditors.  The Debtors, he
continues, merely require additional time in order to maximize the
value of their estates.

The Debtors' Exclusive Period Extension Motion is scheduled for
hearing on August 25, 2015 at 3:00 p.m. The deadline for the filing
of objections to the Motion is set on July 29, 2015 at 4:00 p.m.

Deb Stores Holding LLC and its affiliated debtors are represented
by:

          Laura Davis Jones, Esq.
          David M. Bertenthal, Esq.
          Joshua M. Fried, Esq.
          Peter J. Keane, Esq.
          PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
          919 North Market Street, 17th Floor
          P.O. Box 8705
          Wilmington, DE 19899-8705
          Telephone: (302)652-4100
          Facsimile: (302)652-4400
          Email: ljones@pszjlaw.com
                 dbertenthal@pszjlaw.com
                 jfried@pszjlaw.com
                 pkeane@pszjlaw.com

                   About Deb Stores Holding LLC

Headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Deb Stores is
a
mall-based retailer in the juniors "fast-fashion" specialty
sector
 that operates under the name "DEB" and offers moderately
priced,
fashionable, coordinated women's sportswear, dresses,
coats,
 lingerie, accessories and shoes for junior and plus
sizes.  The 
company, founded by Philip Rounick and Emma Weiner,
opened its
 first store under the name JOY Hosiery in
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania in 1932.  As of Sept. 30, 2014, the
company operated
a
total of 295 retail store locations
(primarily in the East and
 Midwest, especially Pennsylvania,
Ohio and Michigan) as well as an
e-commerce channel.



On June 26, 2011, Deb Stores' predecessors -- DSI Holdings
Inc.
and its subsidiaries -- sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D.
Del. Lead Case No. 11-11941) and closed the sale of the
assets
 three months later to Ableco Finance, LLC, the agent for
the first 
lien lenders.



Deb Stores Holding LLC and eight affiliated companies commenced

Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases in Delaware on Dec. 4, 2014.  The

Debtors are seeking to have their cases jointly administered, with

pleadings maintained on the case docket for Deb Stores
Holding
(Case No. 14-12676).  The cases are assigned to Judge
Mary F. 
Walrath.



Laura Davis Jones, Esq., Colin R. Robinson, Esq., at and Peter
J.
Keane, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, in
Wilmington,
Delaware, serve as counsel to the Debtors.  Epiq
Bankruptcy 
Solutions, LLC, is the claims and noticing
agent.

 As of Dec. 31, 2014, the Debtors' most recent audited
consolidated
financial statements reflected assets totaling $90.5
million and
 liabilities totaling $120.1 million. 

The
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors tapped Cooley LLP as

its lead counsel; Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP as its co-counsel;

and Zolfo Cooper, LLC as its bankruptcy consultants and financial

advisors.




DOTS LLC: Loses $872,000 Clawback Suit Against Capstone Media
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Michael B. Kaplan of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the District of New Jersey granted Capstone Media's
motion for summary judgment in the case, DOTS, LLC, et al.,
Plaintiffs, v. CAPSTONE MEDIA, Defendant, ADV. PRO. NO. 14-1816
(MBK), (Bankr. D. NJ)

The Debtors seek to (i) recover certain alleged preferential
transfers, approximating $872,425, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sections
547 and 550; (ii) disallow any claims asserted by Capstone against
the Debtors pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 502; and (iii) recoup
attorneys' fees under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7008(b).
Capstone Media seeks summary judgment on all counts contained in
the adversary complaint.

In his Memorandum Decision dated July 16, 2015 available at
http://is.gd/6K09Jxfrom Leagle.com, Judge Kaplan granted Capstone
Media's motion for summary judgment. The crux of the dispute
centers on whether payments made by the Debtors to Capstone were in
fact on account of antecedent debts. Absent the Debtors'
satisfaction of this prong, the Debtors' suit cannot be successful.


The Court has received and reviewed the parties' submissions and
entertained oral argument on June 11, 2015. The Court finds that
the payments/transfers at issue were not tendered on account of
antecedent debts and, therefore, will grant summary judgment in
favor of Capstone.

Joao F. Magalhaes, Esq. -- jmagalhaes@trenklawfirm.com -- of Trenk,
DiPasquale, Della Fera & Sodono, P.C. serves as counsel for
Debtors

Jami B. Nimeroff, Esq. -- jnimeroff@bsnlawyers.com -- of Brown Wynn
McGarry Nimeroff LLC serves as counsel for Capstone Media

                          About DOTS LLC

Dots is a retailer of fashionable clothing, accessories, and
footwear for price-conscious women.  Dots provides missy and plus
size choices to fashion savvy 25 to 35 year old women at
approximately 400 retail stores throughout the Midwest, East, and
South United States.  Dots' workforce includes 3,500 individuals in
their stores, distribution center, and corporate headquarters.

Dots, LLC, and its affiliates sought bankruptcy protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case No.
14-11016) on Jan. 20, 2014, to sell some or all of their assets.

Lowenstein Sandler LLP serves as counsel to the Debtors.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is financial advisor and investment
banker.  Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., is the claims and notice
agent.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors have outstanding secured debt
owed to senior lender Salus Capital Partners, LLC, of which $14.5
million remains outstanding under a revolving facility and $16.1
million is owed under a term facility.  The Debtors also have not
less than $17 million outstanding under subordinated term loan
agreements with Irving Place Capital Partners III L.P. ("IPC") and
related entities.  Moreover, the Debtors have aggregate unsecured
debts of $47.0 million.  The Debtors disclosed $51,574,560 in
assets and $85,442,656 in liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

Salus, the prepetition senior lender and the DIP lender, is
represented by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP.  The prepetition
subordinated lenders are represented by Okin Hollander & DeLuca,
LLP.

The Company has arranged to borrow $36 million to keep operating as
it reorganizes under court protection.

Otterbourg P.C. serves as counsel to the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors; and FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as its
financial advisor.


DOVER DOWNS: Receives Non-Compliance Notice from NYSE
-----------------------------------------------------
Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc., was notified by the New
York Stock Exchange on July 22, 2015, that the average closing
price of the Company's common stock had fallen below $1.00 per
share over a period of 30 consecutive trading days, which is the
minimum average share price for continued listing on the NYSE under
the NYSE Listed Company Manual.

Under NYSE rules, the Company has six months following receipt of
the notification, subject to possible extension, to regain
compliance with the minimum share price requirement or be subject
to delisting.  The Company can also regain compliance at any time
during the six-month cure period if its common stock has a closing
share price of at least $1.00 on the last trading day of any
calendar month during the period and also has an average closing
share price of at least $1.00 over the 30-trading day period ending
on the last trading day of that month.

The notice has no immediate impact on the listing of the Company's
common stock, which will continue to trade on the NYSE under the
symbol "DDE" but will be assigned a ".BC" indicator by the NYSE to
signify that the Company is not currently in compliance with NYSE
continued listing standards.

The Company has 10 business days to notify the NYSE of its intent
to cure this deficiency.  The Company intends to so notify the NYSE
on a timely basis.

                          About Dover Downs

Owned by Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (NYSE: DDE),
Dover Downs Hotel & Casino(R) is a gaming and entertainment resort
destination in the Mid-Atlantic region.  Gaming operations consist
of approximately 2,500 slots and a full complement of table games
including poker.  The AAA-rated Four Diamond hotel is Delaware's
largest with 500 luxurious rooms/suites and amenities including a
full-service spa/salon, concert hall and 41,500 sq. ft. of multi-
use event space.  Live, world-class harness racing is featured
November through April, and horse racing is simulcast year-round.
Professional football parlay betting is accepted during the
season.  Additional property amenities include multiple
restaurants from fine dining to casual fare, bars/lounges and
retail shops.  Visit http://www.doverdowns.com/

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $176 million in total assets,
$63.5 million in total liabilities and $112 million in total
stockholders' equity.    

Dover Downs reported a net loss of $706,000 in 2014, compared to
net earnings of $13,000 in 2013.

KPMG LLP, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company's credit facility
expires on Sept. 30, 2015, and at present no agreement has been
reached to refinance the debt, which raises substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


DOWLING COLLEGE: Enters Forbearance Agreement, Moody's Says
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dowling College, NY's (Ca, negative) announcement on July 20, 2015
that it entered into a forbearance agreement with its creditors on
the Series 1996, 2002 and 2006 (not rated) bonds through June 30,
2016 is deemed default as the development indicates the payment
will not be met through the originally scheduled terms, Moody's
Investors Service says in a new report.

The college also entered into new debt (unrated) agreement of $6.7
million which will provide much needed liquidity and pay down
outstanding mortgage notes.

"The forbearance agreement and new debt will provide the college
near term relief due to the infusion of liquidity to support
operations and more time to implement strategic initiatives,"
Moody's AVP -- Analyst Pranav Sharma says in "Dowling College:
Forbearance Provides Short-term Relief."

Moody's says the Ca rating reflects the magnitude of Dowling's
financial challenges.

"These challenges include a multi-year trend of declining
enrollment, weak operating performance and thin liquidity, "Sharma
says.

The negative outlook reflects the expectation the college's
operations will remain challenged in the near term.



ENERGY FUTURE: Amends Chapter 11 Exit Plan
------------------------------------------
Peg Brickley, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported that
bondholders that have raised billions to buy Energy Future Holdings
Corp.'s prized business, Oncor, will get a shot at pulling off
their deal.

According to the report, loaded with $42 billion in debt, Energy
Future has been looking for a way out of bankruptcy since last
year.  Amended Chapter 11 plan documents filed on July 23 say the
company is still weighing two options.  But headed into a crucial
phase in its hard-fought Chapter 11 case, Energy Future believes a
buyout offer for Oncor from junior bondholders, in an alliance with
Hunt Consolidated Inc., is "the superior path" to the exit, the
report related.

                        About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.  Oncor, an
80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the largest
regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth.  EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).  The Debtors are seeking to have their cases jointly
administered for procedural purposes.

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion.  The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal.  The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor, and
Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as
legal advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor.  The
EFH equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is
represented by Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and
Gregory A. Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S.
Weisfelner, Esq., Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq.,
Jeremy B. Coffey, Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in
the case.  The Committee represents the interests of the unsecured
creditors of ONLY of Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company
LLC; EFCH's direct subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings
Company LLC; and EFH Corporate Services Company, and of no other
debtors.  The Committee has selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and
Polsinelli PC for representation in this high-profile energy
restructuring.  The lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck,
Esq., Brett H. Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at
Morrison & Foerster LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K.
Edelson, Esq., Shanti M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at
Polsinelli PC.


ENERGY FUTURE: Inks Trading & Hedging Deals with Muni-LSEs
----------------------------------------------------------
Energy Future Holdings Corp. and its affiliated debtors seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to enter with Luminant Energy Company LLC, Luminant ET
Services Company, and Luminant Generation Company LLC, (a) limited
non-proprietary hedging and trading arrangements with
municipally-owned utilities and cooperatives that operate as load
serving entities within the ERCOT market, also known as the
Muni-LSEs; and (b) enter into non-proprietary hedging and trading
arrangements to hedge generation obligations to the Muni-LSEs.

Jason M. Madron, Esq., at Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., in
Wilmington, Delaware, tells the Court that pursuant to the 2016
Non-Proprietary Order, the Debtors are permitted to enter into
Non-Proprietary Hedging and Trading Arrangements with a tenor
beyond December 31, 2015, without further order of the Court,
subject to certain limits established by the Audit Committee.  He
further tells the Court that in light of the Muni-LSEs' increasing
confidence in the Debtors' creditworthiness, the Hedging and
Trading Entities believe they now have an opportunity to capture
significant value by entering into Non-Proprietary LSE Arrangements
with a tenor beyond 27 calendar months from a particular Reference
Date.

Joseph Ho, Senior Vice President of Enterprise Risk Management for
Energy Future Holdings Corp., relates that the Non-Proprietary LSE
Arrangements have the potential to unlock significant value for the
Debtors' Estates.  He says the new Non-Proprietary LSE Arrangements
provide the Hedging and Trading Entities with the potential to
serve the 25% of the ERCOT market that has remained virtually
inaccessible over the last several years.

The Debtors' motion is scheduled for hearing on August 11, 2015 at
9:30 a.m.  The deadline for the filing of objections to the motion
is set on August 4, 2015 at 4:00 p.m.

Energy Future Holdings Corp. and its affiliated debtors are
represented by:

          Mark D. Collins, Esq.
          Daniel J. DeFranceschi, Esq.
          Jason M. Madron, Esq.
          RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
          920 North King Street
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302)651-7700
          Facsimile: (302)651-7701
          Email: collins@rlf.com
                 defranceschi@rlf.com
                 madron@rlf.com

            -- and --

          Edward O. Sassower, Esq.
          Stephen E. Hessler, Esq.
          Brian E. Schartz, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          601 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10022-4611
          Telephone: (212)446-4800
          Facsimile: (212)446-4900
          Email: edward.sassower@kirkland.com
                 stephen.hessler@kirkland.com
                 brian.schartz@kirkland.com

            -- and --

          James H.M. Sprayregen, Esq.
          Marc Kieselstein, Esq.
          Chad J. Husnick, Esq.
          Steven N. Serajeddini, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          300 North LaSalle
          Chicago, Illinois 60654
          Telephone: (312)862-2000
          Facsimile: (312)862-2200
          Email: james.sprayregen@kirkland.com
                 marc.kieselstein@kirkland.com
                 chad.husnick@kirkland.com
                 steven.serajeddini@kirkland.com

                        About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas.  Oncor,
an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the largest
regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.

The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth.  EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).  The Debtors are seeking to have their cases
jointly administered for procedural purposes.

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion.  The Debtors have $42
billion of funded indebtedness.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal.  The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,
and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring
agreement are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP,
as legal advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor.
The EFH equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor.  Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for
the second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is
represented by Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and
Gregory A. Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S.
Weisfelner, Esq., Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq.,
Jeremy B. Coffey, Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed in
the case.  The Committee represents the interests of the unsecured
creditors of ONLY of Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company
LLC; EFCH's direct subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings
Company LLC; and EFH Corporate Services Company, and of no other
debtors.  The Committee has selected Morrison & Foerster LLP and
Polsinelli PC for representation in this high-profile energy
restructuring.  The lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck,
Esq., Brett H. Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at
Morrison & Foerster LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K.
Edelson, Esq., Shanti M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., at
Polsinelli PC.


ERF WIRELESS: STJV Trust Holds 38% of Series A Pref. Stock
----------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, STJV Trust disclosed that as of July 22, 2015, it
beneficially owned 3,801,578 Series A Preferred Stock of ERF
Wireless, Inc., which represents 38 percent of the shares
outstanding.  A copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                        http://is.gd/mdg9sp

                         About ERF Wireless

Based in League City, Texas, ERF Wireless, Inc., provides secure,
high-capacity wireless products and services to a broad spectrum of
customers in primarily underserved, rural and suburban parts of the
United States.

ERF Wireless reported a net loss attributable to the company of
$7.26 million in 2013, a net loss of $4.81 million in 2012, and a
net loss of $3.37 million in 2011.

As of Sept. 30, 2014, the Company had $3.59 million in total
assets, $10.4 million in liabilities, and a $6.84 million
shareholders' deficit.


ESCO MARINE: Caterpillar Fin'l Given Additional Adequate Protection
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Richard Schmidt of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division, at the behest of
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation, lifted the automatic
stay imposed in the Chapter 11 cases of Esco Marine, Inc., et al.,
and directed the Debtors to provide additional adequate protection
to Caterpillar with respect to two 330DMH Excavators.

John Mayer, Esq., at Ross, Banks, May, Cron & Cavin, P.C., in
Houston, Texas, tells the Court that the 330DMH Excavators were the
subject of a Finance Lease between Caterpillar Financial, as Lessor
and Texas Best Equipment, LLC, as Lessee.  Mr. Mayer further tells
the Court that the Caterpillar Excavators were later sold by
Louisiana Machinery Company, LLC, to Caterpillar Financial.  He
notes that Texas Best was in possession of the 330DMH Excavators as
of March 9, 2012.  He says that as of the Petition Date, the
balance which remains unpaid n the Finance Lease is $439,368.  Mr.
Mayer asserts that the Debtor has no equity in the 330DMH
Excavators and that they are not necessary to an effective
reorganization.  He further says that the Excavators are declining
in value through wear and tear and that the Debtor has not afforded
adequate protection to Caterpillar Financial for the use of the
Excavators.

The Debtors filed an objection, saying there is no cause to lift
the automatic stay as the value of the Excavators is not declining
because they are not being used in the ordinary course of business
and are currently sitting idle.  The Debtors, however, withdrew
their objection.

Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation is represented by:

          John Mayer, Esq.
          ROSS, BANKS, MAY, CRON & CAVIN, P.C.
          2 Riverway, Suite 700
          Houston, TX 77056
          Telephone: (713)626-1200
          Facsimile: (713)623-6014
          Email: jmayer@rossbanks.com

Esco Marine, Inc. and its affiliated debtors are represented by:

          R. Glen Ayers, Esq.
          David S. Gragg, Esq.
          Natalie F. Wilson, Esq.
          Allen M. DeBard, Esq.
          LANGLEY & BANACK, INC.
          Suite 900, Trinity Plaza II
          745 East Mulberry
          San Antonio, TX 78212-3166
          Telephone: (210)736-6600
          Facsimile: (210)735-6889
          Email: gayers@langleybanack.com
                 dgragg@langleybanack.com
                 nwilson@langleybanack.com
                 adebard@langleybanack.com

                         About ESCO Marine

ESCO Marine, Inc., and four affiliates sought Chapter 11
Bankruptcy protection in Corpus Christi, Texas (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)
on March 7, 2015.

ESCO Marine disclosed $28.8 million in assets and $35.5 million in
debt as of Jan. 31, 2015.

The cases are assigned to Judge Richard S. Schmidt.  The Debtors
filed an emergency motion seeking joint administration of their
Chapter 11 cases, requesting to designate as the "main case" the
proceedings of ESCO Marine, Inc., Case No. 15-20107.

ESCO Metals, LLC, ESCO Shredding, LLC, Texas Best Recycling, LLC,
and Texas Best Equipment LLC are affiliates of ESCO Marine.  ESCO
Marine is the operating parent company.

The Debtors have tapped Roderick Glen Ayers, Jr., Esq., at Langley
Banack Inc., in San Antonio, as counsel.


ESCO MARINE: Committee Wants Callidus Credit Bid Capped at $30MM
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in the
Chapter 11 cases of ESCO Marine, Inc., et al., asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi
Division, to limit to $30,381,223 the maximum amount of the credit
bid that may be submitted by Callidus Capital Corporation for
substantially all of the Debtors' assets.

Callidus Capital Corporation has a right to credit bid for the
Debtors' assets.  Callidus has an agreed prepetition secured claim
of approximately $28 million under the prepetition loan.  Callidus
also has an agreed, super-priority postpetition administrative
claim arising under the Cash Collateral Orders and the Interim and
Final DIP Orders.  Based on the Debtor's use of cash collateral and
postpetition funds, it is estimated that Callidus' postpetition,
super-priority administrative claim will total approximately $32
million as of July 31, 2015.

Callidus has notified the Court that it has the right to credit bid
at any auction, sale or foreclosure sale up to the amount of
$33,470,722, as of July 10, 2015.

The Committee objects to the proposed credit bid on the basis that:
(i) the amount cannot be substantiated; and (ii) Callidus should
not be allowed to credit bid with regard to assets upon which it
does not hold a valid lien.

According to the Committee's counsel, Stephen W. Sather, Esq., at
Barron & Newburger, P.C., in Austin, Texas, the amount of the
Callidus credit bid cannot be calculated with full precision
because the Committee lacks complete information as to how Callidus
calculated the balance of Facility A.  Mr. Sather asserts that
given the lack of transparency by Callidus and the known problems
with the calculation of its claim, Callidus' credit bid should be
limited.  He tells the Court that the Committee proposes that the
following calculation be used for determining the credit bid:

   Principal as of 3/24     $28,191,867.93
   Interest as of 3/24      $   340,117.71
   Post-Petition Advances   $ 2,256,924.00
   Less Unapproved Legal    $  (407,686.00)
   Total                    $30,381,223.64

Mr. Sather relates that the Committee is in the process of filing
an adversary proceeding to determine the extent, priority and
validity of the pre-petition liens of Callidus prior to the auction
sale.  He adds that the Committee has also objected to granting
Callidus a post-petition lien on assets upon which it did not hold
a pre-petition lien, more particularly: (i) real property located
in Donna, Texas; (ii) leases with the Port of Brownsville; (iii)
titled vehicles and boats; (iv) documented vessels subject to the
Ship Mortgage Act; and (v) commercial tort claims, which are not
being included in the auction and therefore should not be an issue.
Mr. Sather asserts that Callidus should be required to submit a
separate cash bid should it wish to bid on these assets.

Callidus Capital Corporation is represented by:

          Shelby A. Jordan, Esq.
          Nathaniel Peter Holzer, Esq.
          JORDAN, HYDEN, WOMBLE,
          CULBRETH & HOLZER, P.C.
          500 North Shoreline Blvd., Suite 900
          Corpus Christi, TX 78401-0341
          Telephone: (361)884-5678
          Facsimile: (361)888-5555
          Email: sjordan@jhwclaw.com
                 pholzer@jhwclaw.com

            -- and --

          Michael C. Hammer, Esq.
          DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
          350 S. Main Street, Suite 300
          Ann Arbor, MI 48104
          Telephone: (734)623-1696
          Facsimile: (734)623-1625
          Email: Mhammer@dickinsonwright.com
                 
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by:

          Barbara M. Barron, Esq.
          Stephen W. Sather, Esq.
          BARRON & NEWBURGER, P.C.
          1212 Guadalupe Street, Suite 104
          Austin, TX 78701
          Telephone: (512)476-9103
          Facsimile: (512)476-9253
          Email: Bbarron@bn-lawyers.com
                 Ssather@bn-lawyers.com

                         About ESCO Marine

ESCO Marine, Inc., and four affiliates sought Chapter 11
Bankruptcy protection in Corpus Christi, Texas (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)
on March 7, 2015.

ESCO Marine disclosed $28.8 million in assets and $35.5 million in
debt as of Jan. 31, 2015.

The cases are assigned to Judge Richard S. Schmidt.  The Debtors
filed an emergency motion seeking joint administration of their
Chapter 11 cases, requesting to designate as the "main case" the
proceedings of ESCO Marine, Inc., Case No. 15-20107.

ESCO Metals, LLC, ESCO Shredding, LLC, Texas Best Recycling, LLC,
and Texas Best Equipment LLC are affiliates of ESCO Marine.  ESCO
Marine is the operating parent company.

The Debtors have tapped Roderick Glen Ayers, Jr., Esq., at Langley
Banack Inc., in San Antonio, as counsel.


ESCO MARINE: Court Approves Bidding & Auction Procedures for Assets
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Esco Marine, Inc. and its affiliated debtors sought and obtained
approval from Judge Richard S. Schmidt of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division, of
bidding and auction procedures governing the sale of substantially
all of the Debtors' assets.

Callidus Capital Corporation has a right to credit bid for the
Debtors' assets.  Callidus has an agreed prepetition secured claim
of approximately $28 million under the prepetition loan.  Callidus
also has an agreed, super-priority postpetition administrative
claim arising under the Cash Collateral Orders and the Interim and
Final DIP Orders.  Based on the Debtor's use of cash collateral and
postpetition funds, it is estimated that Callidus' postpetition,
super-priority administrative claim will total approximately $32
million as of July 31, 2015.

R. Glen Ayers, Jr., Esq., at Langley & Banack, Inc., in San
Antonio, Texas, tells the Court that the Chief Restructuring
Officer, in consultation with the Debtor's professionals, Callidus
C, the DIP Lender, and Callidus' professionals, has determined that
a sale of all or substantially all of the Debtors' assets has the
best chance of maximizing value for all stakeholders.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors objected to the
bidding procedures motion, complaining that (a) the deadlines
established by the Bidding Procedures are not sufficiently long to
allow for bidding by independent parties; (b) even though the
Debtors are required to "consult" with Callidus and the Creditors'
Committee, the proposed order allows them to unilaterally modify
the auction procedures without prior notice or opportunity for
hearing; (c) the proposed Bidding Procedures fail to provide for a
minimum initial bid in order for a Bidder to become a Qualified
Bidder; (d) the proposed Bidding Procedures do not adequately set
out how the amount of a bid should be structured and that the
Bidding Procedures should include a definition of Purchased Assets
and Excluded Assets; and (e) the proposed Bidding Procedures should
contain a mechanism for determining the specific amount of the
credit bid which may be submitted by Callidus in the event that the
parties cannot agree.

The hearing to consider approval of the sale is set for on July 30,
2015 at 9:00 a.m., prevailing Central time.  Objections to the
approval of the sale of Assets must be filed no later than July 28.
The deadline for persons interested in purchasing the Assets to
submit a bid was July 17.  An auction was conducted on July 23.

Esco Marine, Inc. and its affiliated Debtors are represented by:

          R. Glen Ayers, Jr., Esq.
          David S. Gragg, Esq.
          Natalie F. Wilson, Esq.
          LANGLEY & BANACK, INC.
          745 East Mulberry, Suite 900
          San Antonio, TX 78212-3166
          Telephone: (210)736-6600
          Facsimile: (210)735-6889
          Email: gayers@langleybanack.com
                 dgragg@langleybanack.com
                 nwilson@langleybanack.com
                 
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by:

          Barbara M. Barron, Esq.
          Stephen W. Sather, Esq.
          BARRON & NEWBURGER, P.C.
          1212 Guadalupe Street, Suite 104
          Austin, TX 78701
          Telephone: (512)476-9103
          Facsimile: (512)476-9253
          Email: Bbarron@bn-lawyers.com
                 Ssather@bn-lawyers.com

                         About ESCO Marine

ESCO Marine, Inc., and four affiliates sought Chapter 11
Bankruptcy protection in Corpus Christi, Texas (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)
on March 7, 2015.

ESCO Marine disclosed $28.8 million in assets and $35.5 million in
debt as of Jan. 31, 2015.

The cases are assigned to Judge Richard S. Schmidt.  The Debtors
filed an emergency motion seeking joint administration of their
Chapter 11 cases, requesting to designate as the "main case" the
proceedings of ESCO Marine, Inc., Case No. 15-20107.

ESCO Metals, LLC, ESCO Shredding, LLC, Texas Best Recycling, LLC,
and Texas Best Equipment LLC are affiliates of ESCO Marine.  ESCO
Marine is the operating parent company.

The Debtors have tapped Roderick Glen Ayers, Jr., Esq., at Langley
Banack Inc., in San Antonio, as counsel.


EURAMAX HOLDINGS: Files Investor Presentation Materials with SEC
----------------------------------------------------------------
Euramax Holdings, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission copies of slides from an investor presentation that the
Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary Euramax International, Inc.
may use in meetings with investors from time to time.  The slides
are available at http://is.gd/fGIvYx

                          About Euramax

Based in Norcross, Georgia, Euramax International, Inc., is a
leading international producer of aluminum, steel, vinyl and
fiberglass products for original equipment manufacturers,
distributors, contractors and home centers in North America and
Western Europe.  The Company was acquired for $1 billion in 2005
by management and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners.

Euramax Int'l has subsidiaries in Canada (Euramax Canada, Inc.),
United Kingdom (Ellbee Limited and Euramax Coated Products
Limited), and The Netherlands (Euramax Coated Products B.V.), and
France (Euramax Industries S.A.).

Euramax reported a net loss of $59.27 million in 2014, a net loss
of $24.89 million in 2013 and a net loss of $36.76 million in
2012.

                        Bankruptcy Warning

"...[A]approximately $500 million of our outstanding indebtedness,
under the Notes and the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility, is
currently scheduled to mature between April 1 and October 1, 2016.
Under the terms of our ABL Credit Facility, we are required to
obtain an extension of the maturity of the debt that matures in
2016 to a date that is at least 90 days after March 1, 2018, which
is the scheduled maturity date of the ABL Credit Facility.  In the
event that we do not refinance the debt or obtain such an extension
on or before December 31, 2015, then the maturity date for our ABL
Credit Facility will accelerate to January 31, 2016. Accordingly,
we must complete a refinancing of those debt facilities and/or
enter into an amendment to the terms of the Notes and the Senior
Unsecured Loan Facility prior to the end of 2015.  In order to do
so, we must negotiate satisfactory agreements with the holders of
the Notes and the lenders under the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility
and/or obtain equity or debt financing on terms that are acceptable
to the Company.  There can be no assurance that the holders of the
Notes or the lenders under the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility will
agree to any such amendments or there can be no assurance that we
can complete a refinancing prior to December 31, 2015, or that the
terms of any such equity or debt financing would be acceptable to
the Company. In the event that we are unable to obtain such
amendments or extensions, or complete such refinancing, the
Company
would need to explore other alternatives, which could include a
potential restructuring or reorganization under the bankruptcy
laws," the Company states in its 2014 annual report.

As of April 3, 2015, Euramax had $529 million in total assets, $733
million in total liabilities and a $204 million total shareholders'
deficit.

                            *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Dec. 13, 2012, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Euramax International, Inc.'s corporate family rating
and probability of default rating to Caa2 from Caa1.  The
downgrade reflects Moody's expectation that the turmoil in
global financial markets and weakness in Europe will continue to
hamper Euramax's revenues and operating margins as well as weaken
key credit metrics.

As reported by the TCR on July 30, 2009, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services raised its ratings on Norcross, Georgia-based Euramax
International Inc., including the long-term corporate credit
rating, to 'B-' from 'D'.

"The ratings upgrade reflects the company's highly leveraged,
although somewhat improved, financial risk profile following a
recent out-of-court restructuring," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst Dan Picciotto.  "As a result of the restructuring,
Euramax's second-lien debtholders received equity and about half
of its new $513 million of first-lien debt is pay-in-kind,
providing some cash flow benefit," he continued.


EURAMAX HOLDINGS: Names New President and CEO
---------------------------------------------
Euramax Holdings, Inc., announced that, effective Aug. 10, 2015,
Richard C. Brown is appointed the president and chief executive
officer of the Company.  He will also become a member of the Board
of Directors of the Company.  Mr. Brown joins the Company from Sun
Capital Partners, Inc., where he was a managing director and
partner since 2012 and served as the Board Chairman of multiple
businesses including those in chemicals, packaging, automotive,
distribution, telecommunications, construction and consumer
products segments.  He has also provided operational leadership for
multiple portfolio companies.
    
Previously, Mr. Brown served as the president and chief executive
officer of Performance Fibers, a Sun Capital Partners portfolio
company, from 2008 to 2012.  Prior to that, he served as the Vice
President of WR Grace & Co. and President of Grace Performance
Chemicals from 2005 to 2008.  Earlier in his career, Mr. Brown led
multiple businesses and served in various roles with the General
Electric Company for 19 years, including serving as the president
and Global Business Unit Leader (GE Advanced Materials), president
and general manager (GE Sealants and Adhesives), marketing manager
(Consumer and Electronics, GE Plastics), and manager of Global
Accounts (GE Plastics).

"Rick's proven executive experience, strategic and operational
skills and ability to develop and lead a strong global team make
him an ideal fit for Euramax.  He has had deep experience leading
the growth of companies with multiple products, brands and global
end-markets," said Michael Lundin, Chairman of the Company's Board
of Directors.

Mr. Brown will succeed Hugh Sawyer, a professional in Huron
Consulting Group's Business Advisory Practice, who has served as
interim president since February 2014.  "I'm deeply honored to have
been asked to lead Euramax," said Mr. Brown.  "This is an exciting
time for the Company and I look forward to working with the entire
Euramax team in building on the strong foundation laid under the
leadership of Hugh and the rest of the management team."

In connection with his appointment, the Company and Mr. Brown have
entered into a written employment agreement for an initial two-year
term, which provides for the following compensation terms for Mr.
Brown.  Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Brown will
receive a base salary of $700,000 per year, subject to increase,
but not decrease, at the discretion of the Board.

                           About Euramax

Based in Norcross, Georgia, Euramax International, Inc., is a
leading international producer of aluminum, steel, vinyl and
fiberglass products for original equipment manufacturers,
distributors, contractors and home centers in North America and
Western Europe.  The Company was acquired for $1 billion in 2005
by management and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners.

Euramax Int'l has subsidiaries in Canada (Euramax Canada, Inc.),
United Kingdom (Ellbee Limited and Euramax Coated Products
Limited), and The Netherlands (Euramax Coated Products B.V.), and
France (Euramax Industries S.A.).

Euramax reported a net loss of $59.27 million in 2014, a net loss
of $24.89 million in 2013 and a net loss of $36.76 million in
2012.

                        Bankruptcy Warning

"...[A]approximately $500 million of our outstanding indebtedness,
under the Notes and the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility, is
currently scheduled to mature between April 1 and October 1, 2016.
Under the terms of our ABL Credit Facility, we are required to
obtain an extension of the maturity of the debt that matures in
2016 to a date that is at least 90 days after March 1, 2018, which
is the scheduled maturity date of the ABL Credit Facility.  In the
event that we do not refinance the debt or obtain such an extension
on or before December 31, 2015, then the maturity date for our ABL
Credit Facility will accelerate to January 31, 2016. Accordingly,
we must complete a refinancing of those debt facilities and/or
enter into an amendment to the terms of the Notes and the Senior
Unsecured Loan Facility prior to the end of 2015.  In order to do
so, we must negotiate satisfactory agreements with the holders of
the Notes and the lenders under the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility
and/or obtain equity or debt financing on terms that are acceptable
to the Company.  There can be no assurance that the holders of the
Notes or the lenders under the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility will
agree to any such amendments or there can be no assurance that we
can complete a refinancing prior to December 31, 2015, or that the
terms of any such equity or debt financing would be acceptable to
the Company. In the event that we are unable to obtain such
amendments or extensions, or complete such refinancing, the Company
would need to explore other alternatives, which could include a
potential restructuring or reorganization under the bankruptcy
laws," the Company states in its 2014 annual report.

As of April 3, 2015, Euramax had $529 million in total assets, $733
million in total liabilities and a $204 million total shareholders'
deficit.

                            *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Dec. 13, 2012, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Euramax International, Inc.'s corporate family rating
and probability of default rating to Caa2 from Caa1.  The
downgrade reflects Moody's expectation that the turmoil in
global financial markets and weakness in Europe will continue to
hamper Euramax's revenues and operating margins as well as weaken
key credit metrics.

As reported by the TCR on July 30, 2009, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services raised its ratings on Norcross, Georgia-based Euramax
International Inc., including the long-term corporate credit
rating, to 'B-' from 'D'.

"The ratings upgrade reflects the company's highly leveraged,
although somewhat improved, financial risk profile following a
recent out-of-court restructuring," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst Dan Picciotto.  "As a result of the restructuring,
Euramax's second-lien debtholders received equity and about half
of its new $513 million of first-lien debt is pay-in-kind,
providing some cash flow benefit," he continued.


EURAMAX HOLDINGS: Unit Launches $385 Million Notes Offering
-----------------------------------------------------------
Euramax Holdings, Inc., announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary
Euramax International, Inc. has commenced an offering of
$385,000,000 aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes in
a private placement that is exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933.  The Notes will be
guaranteed by Holdings and, subject to certain exceptions, by the
Company's existing and any future U.S. subsidiaries.  The Notes
will be secured, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens,
on a first priority basis by the assets (other than inventory and
accounts receivables and related assets, which assets secure the
Company's senior asset-based credit facility on a first priority
basis) of Holdings and each of the Company's U.S. subsidiaries and
on a second priority basis by the assets that secures the Company's
asset-based credit facility on a first priority basis.

The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering of
Notes to (i) redeem and repay in full its outstanding 9.50% senior
secured notes due 2016, and (ii) pay fees and expenses related to
the offering and related transactions.  Any remaining proceeds will
be available for general corporate purposes.  Completion of the
offering of Notes is conditioned upon customary closing conditions.
In addition, the completion of the offering of Notes is
conditioned upon the Company entering into an amendment to its
existing senior unsecured loan facility in the aggregate principal
amount of $125 million.  On July 23, 2015, the Company and the
lenders under the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility entered into an
agreement in which the Lenders have agreed to support an amendment
to the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility with terms including an
extension of the maturity of the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility to
5.5 years after the closing date of the amendment, certain
increases in the interest rate payable on amounts outstanding
thereunder, and that not more than 2% interest may be paid in cash
and the remainder shall be paid-in-kind until the Company meets
certain financial tests.  The obligations of the Lenders under the
Support Agreement are subject to the satisfaction of certain
conditions, including the completion of the offering of Notes.
The Notes are being offered and will be sold only to "qualified
institutional buyers" and outside the United States to persons
other than U.S. persons in reliance upon Regulation S under the
Securities Act.

                           About Euramax

Based in Norcross, Georgia, Euramax International, Inc., is a
leading international producer of aluminum, steel, vinyl and
fiberglass products for original equipment manufacturers,
distributors, contractors and home centers in North America and
Western Europe.  The Company was acquired for $1 billion in 2005
by management and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners.

Euramax Int'l has subsidiaries in Canada (Euramax Canada, Inc.),
United Kingdom (Ellbee Limited and Euramax Coated Products
Limited), and The Netherlands (Euramax Coated Products B.V.), and
France (Euramax Industries S.A.).

Euramax reported a net loss of $59.27 million in 2014, a net loss
of $24.89 million in 2013 and a net loss of $36.76 million in
2012.

                        Bankruptcy Warning

"...[A]approximately $500 million of our outstanding indebtedness,
under the Notes and the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility, is
currently scheduled to mature between April 1 and October 1, 2016.
Under the terms of our ABL Credit Facility, we are required to
obtain an extension of the maturity of the debt that matures in
2016 to a date that is at least 90 days after March 1, 2018, which
is the scheduled maturity date of the ABL Credit Facility.  In the
event that we do not refinance the debt or obtain such an extension
on or before December 31, 2015, then the maturity date for our ABL
Credit Facility will accelerate to January 31, 2016. Accordingly,
we must complete a refinancing of those debt facilities and/or
enter into an amendment to the terms of the Notes and the Senior
Unsecured Loan Facility prior to the end of 2015.  In order to do
so, we must negotiate satisfactory agreements with the holders of
the Notes and the lenders under the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility
and/or obtain equity or debt financing on terms that are acceptable
to the Company.  There can be no assurance that the holders of the
Notes or the lenders under the Senior Unsecured Loan Facility will
agree to any such amendments or there can be no assurance that we
can complete a refinancing prior to December 31, 2015, or that the
terms of any such equity or debt financing would be acceptable to
the Company. In the event that we are unable to obtain such
amendments or extensions, or complete such refinancing, the Company
would need to explore other alternatives, which could include a
potential restructuring or reorganization under the bankruptcy
laws," the Company states in its 2014 annual report.

As of April 3, 2015, Euramax had $529 million in total assets, $733
million in total liabilities and a $204 million total shareholders'
deficit.

                            *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Dec. 13, 2012, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Euramax International, Inc.'s corporate family rating
and probability of default rating to Caa2 from Caa1.  The
downgrade reflects Moody's expectation that the turmoil in
global financial markets and weakness in Europe will continue to
hamper Euramax's revenues and operating margins as well as weaken
key credit metrics.

As reported by the TCR on July 30, 2009, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services raised its ratings on Norcross, Georgia-based Euramax
International Inc., including the long-term corporate credit
rating, to 'B-' from 'D'.

"The ratings upgrade reflects the company's highly leveraged,
although somewhat improved, financial risk profile following a
recent out-of-court restructuring," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst Dan Picciotto.  "As a result of the restructuring,
Euramax's second-lien debtholders received equity and about half
of its new $513 million of first-lien debt is pay-in-kind,
providing some cash flow benefit," he continued.


EURAMAX INTERNATIONAL: Moody's Affirms 'Caa2' Corp. Family Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirms Euramax International, Inc.'s
Caa2 Corporate Family Rating ("CFR") following the company's
announcement that it will issue 5-year $385 million senior secured
notes due 2020. The proposed senior secured notes will be used to
refinance Euramax's existing 9.5% senior secured notes due April
2016. Moody's assigns a Caa2 rating on the proposed notes. Moody's
acknowledges positive momentum in Euramax's key credit metrics and
expects continued recovery in the next 12 to 18 months. The outlook
remains Stable.

The following ratings will be affected by this action:

Corporate Family Rating affirmed Caa2

Probability of Default Rating affirmed Caa2-PD

Proposed 5-year $385 million Senior Secured Notes assigned Caa2
(LGD3)

Outlook remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's views the proposed $385 million senior secured notes as a
credit positive for Euramax. The existing senior secured notes come
due April 2016, and -absent the proposed transaction- Euramax could
be facing a potential liquidity crunch. Euramax is starting to show
signs of operational recovery. However, the company's Caa2 CFR is
constrained by its high debt coupled with weak interest coverage.
Additionally, Euramax's negative cash flow generation remains a
concern for Moody's.

Euramax brought in a new management team in 1Q 2014, which laid out
a series of growth and efficiency initiatives that are starting to
have a positive impact. As part of these initiatives, the company
is seeking to refinance its existing senior secured notes ($375
million) with a new set of senior secured notes. This refinancing
would allow Euramax to improve its liquidity profile in the near
term. Euramax is also extending the maturity of its $125 million
senior unsecured loan facility to December 2020. We have assigned a
Caa2 rating to the proposed senior secured notes given Euramax's
strong market position in its segments, its high level of product
assortment as well as its diversified and long-standing customer
base. We anticipate Euramax to be able to follow through on its
business plan since the last three quarters have shown consistent,
albeit slight, improvement. The Stable outlook incorporates our
view that Euramax's debt credit metrics will be supportive of the
Caa2 CFR.

Moody's view Euramax's liquidity as limited as the company may not
be able to generate sufficient cash to service its debt. Free cash
flows were in deficit in FY 2014 (-$10 million), and the company
will continue to be highly dependent upon its $70 million ABL
credit facility (unrated). Euramax's ability to borrow under the
ABL credit facility will be impacted by its compliance with its
financial covenants as well as the size of its borrowing base. As
of December 31, 2014, Euramax had $124 million outstanding under
the senior unsecured loan (unrated) and $35.6 million outstanding
under the ABL credit facility with $2.1 million in cash and cash
equivalents.

Euramax's replacement of its $375 million senior secured notes
--currently maturing in April 2016- with the proposed notes would
push the company's next major maturity out 5 years. As part of the
refinancing transaction, Euramax will also extend the maturity of
its existing $125 million senior unsecured loan (currently due in
October 2016) beyond the tenor of the proposed senior secured
notes. This extension should provide additional cushion in terms of
liquidity and improve Euramax's maturity profile.

What could change the rating -- Up:

An upgrade for Euramax would be possible if operating performance
results in metrics that validate our forward-looking analysis, such
that EBITA/Interest expense is sustained above 1.0x with adjusted
Debt/EBITDA approaching 6.25x (all ratios incorporate Moody's
standard adjustments). The successful execution of Euramax's
refinancing would also provide the company with a better liquidity
profile and reduction in balance sheet debt. These events could
support positive rating actions.

What could change the rating -- Down:

A downgrade could ensue if actions taken by Euramax fail to improve
operating performance such that adjusted EBITA/Interest expense
trends towards 0.5x and adjusted Debt/EBITDA approaching 8.0x.
Failure to execute on the extension of the proposed Senior Secured
Notes and the existing Senior Unsecured Loan could result in
negative rating action as well.

Corporate Profile:

Headquartered in Norcross, Georgia, Euramax International, Inc. is
a leading manufacturer of metal and vinyl products sold mainly in
North America and Europe. Euramax's more than 10,000 products are
sold to the residential repair and remodel, commercial construction
and recreational vehicle markets through a network of 35 facilities
(29 in the United States, one in Canada and five in Europe). The
company is effectively controlled by Highland Capital Management.
In FY 2014, Euramax generated $854.7 million of revenue and $47.1
million of Moody's Adjusted EBITDA. All our calculations include
Moody's standard adjustments.



EXELIXIS INC: Signs Underwriting Agreement with Cowen and Company
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Exelixis, Inc., on July 23, 2015, entered into an underwriting
agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC, William Blair & Company,
L.L.C. and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated relating to the
offering, issuance and sale of 25,000,000 shares of the Company's
common stock, par value $0.001 per share.  

Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Underwriters have
agreed to purchase the shares of common stock from the Company at a
price of $5.076 per share, which will result in $126.9 million of
proceeds to the Company before deducting offering expenses.  The
offering is expected to close on or about July 29, 2015, subject to
customary closing conditions.  The shares of common stock will be
listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market.  The Underwriters have a
30-day option to purchase up to an additional 3,750,000 shares of
common stock.  All of the shares in the offering are being sold by
the Company.

Exelixis, in a preliminary prospectus to be used in connection with
a public offering of shares of its Common Stock, disclosed that,
although it has not finalized its consolidated financial statements
for the quarter ended July 3, 2015, it expects to report that it
had $167 million of cash and investments as of July 3, 2015, which
included $76.6 million available for operations, $6.1 million of
short-term restricted investments for public debt service
obligations, $81.6 million of compensating balance investments that
it is required to maintain on deposit with Silicon Valley Bank, and
$2.7 million of long-term restricted investments.

                        About Exelixis Inc.

Headquartered in South San Francisco, California, Exelixis, Inc.,
develops innovative therapies for cancer and other serious
diseases.  Through its drug discovery and development activities,
Exelixis is building a portfolio of novel compounds that it
believes has the potential to be high-quality, differentiated
pharmaceutical products.

Exelixis reported a net loss of $269 million on $25.1 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared with a
net loss of $245 million on $31.3 million of total revenues in
2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $283 million in total assets,
$430 million in total liabilities and a $147 million total
stockholders' deficit.


FAMILY CHRISTIAN: Has Until Oct. 9 to File Chapter 11 Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Michigan
entered an order extending Family Christian, LLC, et al.'s
exclusive period to propose a chapter 11 plan until Oct. 9, 2015,
and the period to solicit acceptances for that plan until Dec. 8.

                      About Family Christian

Family Christian Holding, LLC, is the sole owner and member of
Family Christian, LLC, which operates and runs Family Christian
stores, one of the largest retail sellers of Christian books,
music, DVDs, church supplies, and other faith based merchandise.

Family Christian, LLC, Family Christian Holding, LLC, and
FCS Giftco, LLC, filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr.
W.D. Mich. Lead Case No. 15-00643) on Feb. 11, 2015.  The petition
was signed by Chuck Bengochea as president and CEO.  The Debtors
estimated assets and liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.

The Debtors are being represented by Todd Almassian, Esq., at
Keller & Almassian PLC, and Erich Durlacher, Esq., Brad Baldwin,
Esq., Bryan Glover, Esq., at Burr & Forman LLP as counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 9 appointed seven creditors of Family
Christian LLC to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.



FDD ENTERPRISES: Court Awards $131K to Parking Attendant
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge George B. Daniels of the United States District Court for
Southern District of New York awarded $131,287 to a parking
attendant at a garage owned by FDD Enterprises, Inc., for unpaid
overtime and liquidated damages.

Dossou Gallie Pinovi alleges that FDD Enterprises and Ali Dar
violated the Fair Labor Standards Act and the corresponding
provisions of the New York State Labor Law by insufficiently
compensating him for his work as a parking attendant at the garage
that the Defendants owned.

Judge Daniels concluded that in light of Dar's willful violations
of the FLSA and NYLL, Mr. Pinovi is entitled to unpaid overtime
under the FLSA and NYLL in the amount of $65,643, and liquidated
damages under the FLSA in the amount of $65,643, for a total of
$131,287.  The Plaintiff, according to Judge Daniels, is also
entitled to post-judgment interest after the Clerk of the Court has
entered the judgment in the present case.

The case is DOSSOU GALLIE PINOVI a/k/a GALLIE DOSSOU, Plaintiff, v.
FDD ENTERPRISES, INC. and ALI DAR, Defendants, Case No. 13 CIV.
2800 (GBD)(KNF), (S.D.N.Y.).

The bankruptcy case is In re FDD Enterprises Inc., Case No.
15-11326 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).  The Chapter 11 Petition was filed on
May 21, 2015.  The Debtor is represented by Robert A. Chapnick,
Esq., at Chapnick & Associates, P.C.

A full-text copy of Judge George B. Daniels' Memorandum Decision
and Order dated July 8, 2015 available at http://is.gd/rKryMQfrom
Leagle.com.

Michael Timothy Carr, Esq., of Michael T. Carr, Esq., PLLC serves
as counsel for Plaintiff Dossou Gallie Pinovi.

Robert Alan Chapnick, Esq., of Chapnick & Associates, PC serves as
counsel for Defendant FDd Enterprises, Inc.


FESTIVAL TRANSACTION: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Festival Transaction Services Inc
        469 14th Avenue
        San Francisco, CA 94118

Case No.: 15-14473

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 23, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Washington (Seattle)

Judge: Hon. Timothy W. Dore

Debtor's Counsel: Darrel B Carter, Esq.
                  CBG Law Group PLLC
                  11100 NE 8th St Ste 380
                  Bellevue, WA 98004
                  Tel: 425-283-0432
                  Email: Darrel@cbglaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Christopher R. Haigh, CEO.

A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb15-14473.pdf


FLINTKOTE COMPANY: F. Banks, et al., Prevented from Intervening
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mary F. Walrath of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware denies the motion filed by Frederick Banks, James J.
Loughner, Wayne R. Albright, Desa J. Hooter, Amber Lambert, Jamie
Pauley, Sandra Starr, and Ann Arias, to intervene as creditors in
the Chapter 11 cases of The Flintkote Company and Flintkote Mines
Limited.

The Debtors' counsel, Laura Davis Jones, Esq., at Pachulski, Stang,
Ziehl & Jones LLP, in Wilmington, Delaware, tells the Court that a
PACER search revealed that in the last few months alone, the
movants had filed a number of similar motions to intervene in
various cases in federal courts, many of which have been determined
to be frivolous and/or summarily rejected.  Ms. Jones further tells
the Court that before the movants filed their motion, neither the
debtors nor their officers had ever heard of their alleged interest
in the chapter 11 cases.  She believes that cause to intervene in
the cases simply does not exist.

The Flintkote Company and Flintkote Mines Limited are represented
by:

          Kevin T. Lantry, Esq.
          Christina M. Craige, Esq.
          Helena G. Tseregounis, Esq.
          SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
          555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
          Los Angeles, California 90013
          Telephone: (213)896-6000
          Facsimile: (213)896-6600
          Email: klantry@sidley.com
                 ccraige@sidley.com
                 htseregounis@sidley.com

                  About The Flintkote Company

Headquartered in San Francisco, California, The Flintkote
Company is engaged in the business of manufacturing, processing
anddistributing building materials. Flintkote Mines Limited is
asubsidiary of Flintkote Company and is engaged in the mining
ofbase-precious metals.

The Flintkote Company filed for Chapter 11protection (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 04-11300) on April 30, 2004.Flintkote Mines
Limited filed for Chapter 11 relief (Bankr. D.Del. Case No.
04-12440) on Aug. 25, 2004. Kevin T. Lantry, Esq., Jeffrey E.
Bjork, Esq., Dennis M. Twomey, Esq., Jeremy E.Rosenthal, Esq.,
and Christina M. Craige, Esq., at Sidley Austin, LLP, in Los
Angeles; James E. O'Neill, Esq., and Laura Davis Jones, Esq., at
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, in Wilmington, Del., represent
the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.

Elihu Inselbuch, Esq., at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, in
NewYork, N.Y.; Peter Van N. Lockwood, Esq., Ronald E. Reinsel,
Esq.,at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, in Washington, D.C.; and
PhilipE. Milch, Esq., at Campbell & Levine, LLC, in Wilmington,
Del., represent the Asbestos Claimants Committee as counsel.

James J. McMonagle, is the legal representative for
futureclaimants. The FCR has retained Dr. Timothy Wyant as
claims evaluation consultant. The FCR is represented by James L.
Patton,Jr., Esq., and Edwin J. Harron, Esq., at Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP; and Reginald W. Jackson, Esq., at Vorys,
Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP.

When Flintkote filed for protection from its creditors, it
estimated more than $100 million each in assets and debts. When
Flintkote Mines Limited filed for protection from its creditors, it
estimated assets of $1 million to $50 million, and debts of more
than $100 million.

The Debtors' Chapter 11 cases have been re-assigned to Judge Mary
F. Walrath in line with the retirement of former Bankruptcy
Judge Judith Fitzgerald.

                            *   *   *

Judge Mary F. Walrath of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District
of Delaware has approved the disclosure statement explaining the
modified confirmed amended joint plan of reorganization filed by
The Flintkote Company and Flintkote Mines Limited, and allowed the
Debtors to resolicit the votes of holders of claims in the
eligible
classes with regard to the Plan.

Thereafter, the Debtors have modified their confirmed plan to
incorporate the terms ofa comprehensive settlement with its
parent,
Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, f/k/a Imasco Limited (Canada).
Objections to the confirmation of the Plan were due July 8, 2015.
The confirmation hearing will commence on Aug. 10, 2015, at 10:30
a.m. (ET).


FORTESCUE METALS: Bank Debt Trades at 17% Off
---------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Fortescue Metals
Group Corp. is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 83.57
cents-on-the- dollar during the week ended Friday, July 17, 2015,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing and
reported in the July 23, 2015, edition of The Wall Street Journal.
This represents a decrease of 0.89 percentage points from the
previous week, The Journal relates. Fortescue Metals Group Corp.
pays 275 basis points above LIBOR to borrow under the facility. The
bank loan matures on June 13, 2019, and carries Moody's Ba1 rating
and Standard & Poor's BB+ rating.  The loan is one of the biggest
gainers and losers among 234 widely quoted syndicated loans with
five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended July 17.



FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE: Roy Oliver Reports 10.4% Stake as of July 15
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Roy T. Oliver disclosed in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2015, that he beneficially owns
1,792,596 shares, including the 1,744,492 shares beneficially owned
by Oliver Company Holdings, LLC, over which he has voting and
dispositive power.  The amount represents 10.4 percent of the
shares outstanding.  A copy of the regulatory filing is available
at http://is.gd/U6GBVe

                    About Foundation Healthcare

Oklahoma-based Foundation Healthcare is a healthcare services
company primarily focused on owning controlling interests in
surgical hospitals and the inclusion of ancillary service lines.
The Company currently owns controlling and noncontrolling
interests in surgical hospitals located in Texas.  The Company
also owns noncontrolling interests in ambulatory surgery centers
("ASCs") located in Texas, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, New Jersey,
Maryland and Ohio.

Additionally, the Company provides sleep testing management
services to various rural hospitals in Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri,
Nebraska and South Dakota under management contracts with the
hospitals.  The Company provides management services to a majority
of its Affiliates under the terms of various management
agreements.  Prior to Dec. 2, 2013, the Company's name was
Graymark Healthcare, Inc.

Foundation Healthcare reported a net loss attributable to the
Company common stock of $2.09 million on $101.9 million of
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared to a net loss
attributable to the Company common stock of $20.4 million on $87.2
million of revenues in 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $58.1 million in total
assets, $66.3 million in total liabilities, $8.70 million in
preferred noncontrolling interest and a $16.9 million total
deficit.

Hein & Associates LLP, in Denver, Colorado, issued a "going
concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the
Company had insufficient working capital as of Dec. 31, 2014, to
fund anticipated working capital needs over the next twelve
months.


FRAC TECH: Bank Debt Trades at 26% Off
--------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Frac Tech Services
Ltd is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 74.21
cents-on-the- dollar during the week ended Friday, July 17, 2015,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing and
reported in the July 23, 2015, edition of The Wall Street Journal.
This represents a decrease of 0.49 percentage points from the
previous week, The Journal relates. Frac Tech Services Ltd. pays
475 basis points above LIBOR to borrow under the facility.  The
bank loan matures on April 3, 2021, and carries Moody's B2 rating
and Standard & Poor's B rating.  The loan is one of the biggest
gainers and losers among 234 widely quoted syndicated loans with
five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended July 17.



FRANKLIN PIERCE: Moody's Withdraws 'Caa3' Rating on 1998/2004 Bonds
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has withdrawn Franklin Pierce
University's (NH) Caa3 rating and negative outlook on the Series
1998 and 2004 revenue bonds issued through the New Hampshire Health
and Education Facilities Authority.


FRATERFOOD SERVICE: Court Dismisses Suit vs. DDR Del Sol
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brian K. Tester of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Puerto Rico dismissed the adversary proceeding
captioned FRATERFOOD SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. DDR DEL SOL, LLC,
S.E., Defendant, ADVERSARY NO. 15-00011 BKT (Bankr. D.P.R.).

After the bankruptcy court entered an order granting the rejection
of a lease agreement between Fraterfood Service, Inc., and DDR Del
Sol, LLC, DDR filed a Motion for Prompt Payment of Post-Petition,
Pre-Rejection Rent Claim on December 8, 2014.

In response or as an objection to DDR's payment motion, Fraterfood
initiated an adversary proceeding, charging DDR with illegally
withholding what it deemed to be property of the estate, consisting
of the building, the leased premises' exhaust system, and the
leased premises' power generator.

Judge Tester held that Fraterfood failed to establish an estate
interest upon the building and improvements. In the Lease
Agreement, which Judge Tester held should determine the rights of
the parties, it was agreed that the improvements, including the
building and, more specifically, all electrical fixtures and
equipment installed therein, automatically attached to the
freehold, became part of the leased premises and, in turn, property
of DDR.

Judge Tester also agreed with DDR's argument that the legal basis
for Fraterfood's Complaint is not supported by existing law and
that, furthermore, it was filed for improper purposes, mainly, that
of forestalling DDR's collection of its PPPR. Fraterfood's counsel
was sanctioned for undertaking actions constituting dilatory
litigation. The request for sanctions against Fraterfood, was
however, denied.

The bankruptcy case is IN RE: FRATERFOOD SERVICE, INC., Chapter 11,
Debtor, CASE NO. 14-00002 BKT (Bankr. D.P.R.).

A full-text copy of Judge Tester's July 16, 2015 opinion and order
is available at http://is.gd/m0p6JCfrom Leagle.com.


FREEDOM INDUSTRIES: Court Approves WVDEP/Chemstream Settlement
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of West
Virginia authorized Freedom Industries, Inc. to enter into a
settlement agreement with the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection (WVDEP), Chemstream Holdings, Inc. and
certain other third party plaintiffs, for the remediation of the
Etowah River Terminate site.  

The Settlement Agreement provides the funds necessary to properly
complete the remediation of the Etowah River Terminal site in
accordance with WVDEP standards, which is extremely important to
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  

The approval of the Settlement Agreement also enables the Debtor to
confirm and implement the Amended Plan of Liquidation.  The
confirmation of the Amended Plan allows certain creditor groups,
including Spill Claimants with claims of $3,000 or less, to receive
distributions from the estate in a relatively quick order,
according to Douglas L. Lutz, Esq., at Frost Brown Todd LLC, in
Cincinnati, Ohio.

The Settlement has the support of the Creditors' Committee.

                           ARCADIS' Reply

Before the Court entered it ruling, ARCADIS U.S., Inc. filed a
reply alleging that the Debtor's Settlement Motion provides that
payment of all fees and expenses of ARCADIS or an Alternative WVDEP
Contractor from the ERT Remediation Fund shall be subject to the
terms and provisions of a progress payment plan, in form and
substance acceptable to WVDEP.

On behalf of ARCADIS, Joe M. Supple, Esq., of Supple Law Office
PLLC, argued that this provision deviates from the current Court
approved engagement of ARCADIS which is based upon time and
material invoiced monthly. Mr. Supple further contended that the
terms of the Settlement provide WVDEP with ultimate authority to
approve the method of payment of any contractor engaged to complete
remediation.

Mr. Supple said ARCADIS does not object to the settlement
agreement; rather, its response is filed to provide notice to the
Court and interested parties of the absence of a final engagement
agreement between the Debtor and ARCADIS approved by WVDEP.

Mr. Supple also stated that included within the Chemstream/WVDEP
Settlement is specific mention of funding in the amount of $188,000
for payment of outstanding ARCADIS fees and expenses through April
2015. He tells the Court that in the event that ARCADIS is not
engaged to provide ongoing services, any approved fees and expenses
of ARCADIS must be addressed in the Debtor's plan or otherwise by
order of the Court. Mr. Supple noted that the Plan as proposed by
the Debtor does not contemplate payment of ARCADIS fees and
expenses other than through the ERT fund.

In its Order, the Bankruptcy Court held that the settlement
documented by the Settlement Agreement shall be effective upon the
date on which the Debtor files with the Bankruptcy Court a pleading
and accompanying documentation, including a signed engagement
agreement, that expands the scope of the current retention of
ARCADIS or retains an Alternative WVDEP Contractor acceptable to
WVDEP.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by:

          FROST BROWN TODD LLC          
          Douglas L. Lutz, Esq.
          Ronald E. Gold, Esq.
          3300 Great American Tower
          301 East 4th Street
          Cincinnati, OH 45202
          Telephone: (513)651-6800
          Facsimile: (513)651-6981
          Email: rgold@fbtlaw.com
                 dlutz@fbtlaw.com

                -- and --

          Jared M. Tulley, Esq.
          FROST BROWN TODD LLC
          500 Lee Street East Suite 401
          Charleston, West Virginia 25301
          Telephone: (304)348-2404
          Facsimile: (304)345-0115
          Email: jtully@fbtlaw.com

ARCADIS U.S., Inc. is represented by:

          SUPPLE LAW OFFICE PLLC
          Joe M. Supple, Esq.
          801 Viand Street
          Point Pleasant, WV 25550
          Telephone: (304)675-6249
          Email: joe.supple@supplelaw.net

                      About Freedom Industries

Freedom Industries Inc. is engaged principally in the business of
producing specialty chemicals for the mining, steel and cement
industries.  The Debtor operates two production facilities located
in (a) Nitro, West Virginia; and (b) Charleston, West Virginia.

The company, connected to a chemical spill that tainted the water
supply in West Virginia, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 14-bk-20017) on Jan.
17, 2014.  The case is assigned to Judge Ronald G. Pearson.
The petition was signed by Gary Southern, president.

The Debtor is represented by Mark E Freedlander, Esq., at McGuire
Woods LLP, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Stephen L. Thompson,
Esq., at Barth & Thompson, in Charleston, West Virginia.

On Dec. 31, 2013, four companies merged under the umbrella of
Freedom Industries: Freedom Industries Inc., Etowah River Terminal
LLC, Poca Blending LLC and Crete Technologies LLC.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Feb. 20, 2014,
Kate White, writing for The Charleston Gazette, reported that the
Debtor disclosed $16 million in assets and $6 million in
liabilities when it filed for bankruptcy.

On Feb. 5, 2014, the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee
of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained Frost Brown Todd
LLC as counsel.

On March 18, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court approved the hiring of
Mark Welch at Morris Anderson in Chicago as Freedom's chief
restructuring officer.

                            *     *     *

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Ronald Pearson on May 13, 2015, entered an
order denying Freedom Industries Inc.'s bid to move forward with
its Plan of Liquidation dated April 30, 2015.

The judge sustained the objection of the West Virginia Department
of Environmental Protection ("WVDEP"), which strongly took issue
with the Plan's treatment of environmental remediation and argued
that the Plan did not provide for adequate funding in that regard.

The Plan is a result of negotiations with: (a) the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors, which is comprised of trade
creditors, spill claim creditors and the West Virginia-American
Water Company ("WVAWC"), (b) counsel to certain class action
claimants, including those representing parties in what is
referred to in the Plan as the Bar 101 Case and the Good Case, (c)
the current equity owner of the Debtor and affiliated parties, (d)
Gary Southern and affiliated parties, (e) Dennis Farrell, William
Tis and Charles Herzing and their respective affiliated parties,
who collectively are the former owners and board members of
Freedom.   However, absent from the list of parties coming to
affirmative agreement under the Plan was the WVDEP.



FREEDOM INDUSTRIES: Prosecutors Seek Guilty Plea Hearing for Execs
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Associated Press reported that federal prosecutors are asking a
judge to schedule a guilty plea hearing for the top executive
charged in a massive chemical spill last year.

According to the report, in Charleston on July 22, prosecutors
filed the request for former Freedom Industries President Gary
Southern's hearing.  Southern faces federal pollution and
bankruptcy fraud charges, the report recalled.

                      About Freedom Industries

Freedom Industries Inc. is engaged principally in the business of
producing specialty chemicals for the mining, steel and cement
industries.  The Debtor operates two production facilities located
in (a) Nitro, West Virginia; and (b) Charleston, West Virginia.

The company, connected to a chemical spill that tainted the water
supply in West Virginia, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 14-bk-20017) on
Jan. 17, 2014.  The case is assigned to Judge Ronald G. Pearson.
The petition was signed by Gary Southern, president.

The Debtor is represented by Mark E Freedlander, Esq., at McGuire
Woods LLP, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Stephen L. Thompson,
Esq., at Barth & Thompson, in Charleston, West Virginia.

On Dec. 31, 2013, four companies merged under the umbrella of
Freedom Industries: Freedom Industries Inc., Etowah River Terminal
LLC, Poca Blending LLC and Crete Technologies LLC.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Feb. 20, 2014,
Kate White, writing for The Charleston Gazette, reported that the
Debtor disclosed $16 million in assets and $6 million in
liabilities when it filed for bankruptcy.

On Feb. 5, 2014, the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee
of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained Frost Brown Todd
LLC as counsel.

On March 18, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court approved the hiring of
Mark Welch at MorrisAnderson in Chicago as Freedom's chief
restructuring officer.

                            *     *     *

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Ronald Pearson on May 13, 2015, entered an
order denying Freedom Industries Inc.'s bid to move forward with
its Plan of Liquidation dated April 30, 2015.

The judge sustained the objection of the West Virginia Department
of Environmental Protection ("WVDEP"), which strongly took issue
with the Plan's treatment of environmental remediation and argued
that the Plan did not provide for adequate funding in that regard.

The Plan is a result of negotiations with: (a) the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors which is comprised of trade
creditors, spill claim creditors and the West Virginia-American
Water Company ("WVAWC"), (b) counsel to certain class action
claimants, including those representing parties in what is
referred to in the Plan as the Bar 101 Case and the Good Case, (c)
the current equity owner of the Debtor and affiliated parties, (d)
Gary Southern and affiliated parties, (e) Dennis Farrell, William
Tis and Charles Herzing and their respective affiliated parties,
who collectively are the former owners and board members of
Freedom.   However, absent from the list of parties coming to
affirmative agreement under the Plan was the WVDEP.


GENESYS RESEARCH: Hires Parker & Associates as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
GeneSys Research Institute, Inc. seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts to employ Parker
& Associates as counsel, effective July 14, 2015.

The Debtor requires Parker & Associates to:

   (a) provide legal advice with respect to the Debtor's powers
       and duties as debtor-in-possession in the continued
       operation of its business;

   (b) prepare on behalf of the Debtor necessary applications,
       schedules of assets and liabilities, statement of financial

       affairs, motions, answers, orders, reports and other legal
       papers;

   (c) appear in and to protect the interests of the Debtor before

       this Court;

   (d) negotiate, prepare and seek confirmation of a Chapter 11
       plan and sale of assets;

   (e) represent the Debtor in litigation matters before the
       Court; and

   (f) perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may
       be necessary and proper in the Chapter 11 case.

Parker & Associates will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Nina M. Parker             $395
       Associates                 $275-$305
       Paralegals                 $150

Parker & Associates will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Prior to the petition date, the Debtor made payments to Parker &
Associates on account of services rendered or to be rendered.  The
firm received funds from the Debtor in the amount of $10,000 prior
to the petition date for prepetition services, plus $2,000 fro the
filing fee and other out of pocket expenses incurred in
contemplation of the filing.

Nina M. Parker, founder of Parker & Associates, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Parker & Associates can be reached at:

       Nina M. Parker, Esq.
       PARKER & ASSOCIATES
       10 Converse Place Suite 2
       Winchester, MA 01890
       Tel: (781) 218-3487
       Fax: (781) 729-0187

GeneSys Research Institute, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. D. Mass Case No. 15-12794) on July 14, 2015.  The
petition was signed by Robert Stemple, clerk and treasurer.  Parker
& Associates serves as the Debtor's counsel.  The Debtor estimated
assets of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities of at least $1
million.  The case is assigned to Judge Joan N. Feeney.


GENUTEC BUSINESS: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for Aug. 18
-----------------------------------------------------------
The bankruptcy court hearing to consider confirmation of Genutec
Business Solutions, Inc.'s First Amended Plan is set for Aug. 18,
2015 at 10:30 a.m.

Objections to the Disclosure Statement or Plan were due July 24,
2015.

The Plan will be funded by the revenues of operating subsidiary
Rapid Notify, Inc.  Payments will be made on a monthly basis pro
rata to the unsecured creditors except that Debtor, in its' sole
discretion, may elect to prepay the entire year's payments in
December for the upcoming year if funds are available.

Years of litigation against current and former board members led to
the Debtor's bankruptcy filing.  Litigation resulted in verdicts in
Genutec's favor against Leon Danna and Johan Hebdrick Smit
Duyzentkujnst.  In the same litigation, the Debtor was not
successful against creditors Lawnae Hunter and Michael Taus
resulting in the awards that led to this filing and eventual
settlement.  Former directors Hunter and Taus have combined
unsecured claims of $3,443,702.

Another entity, Merrill Corp, has an unsecured claim for $154,409.

The Debtor filed a plan that proposes to treat claims and interests
as follows:

  * Secured creditors Seaview Mezzanine Fund, LP POC 9 (secured by
a first lien and ownership interest of 38.2%) and TICC Capital
Corp. (secured by second lien and 58.5% ownership interest) are not
impaired as they have no arrangement for ongoing payments on their
initial investments.  If and when Debtor becomes profitable, which
presumably will be after the current claims are paid, TICC and
Seaview would be entitled to share in the profits.

  * The Debtor proposes three alternative plans to pay unsecured
debt:

    -- Alternative 1: On the Effective Date Debtor will make a lump
sum payment of $750,000.00 to be distributed to Hunter and Taus
pro-rata for their undisputed allowed claims which is 20.8%.
Merrill will also receive a lump sum payment of 20.8% of its claim
which comes to $32,116.98.  Following this distribution, the Debtor
will be permitted to file for a final decree, discharge and
closure.

    -- Alternative 2: If the Debtor cannot obtain financing to fund
a lump sum payment on the Effective Date, the Debtor will pay the
unsecured creditors $1,251,600 over 8 years at $12,500 a month with
a balloon payment of $51,600 at the end of year 8.  Under this
alternative, including the balloon payment, Hunter would receive
$809,285.  Taus would receive $388,497.  Merrill would receive
$53,819.  Payments are to begin on the 30th day after the Court
signs the Order Confirming the Chapter 11 Plan.

    -- Alternative 3: As an incentive to pay the debt early,
Creditors have offered a discount off the unpaid balance for an
early payoff according to the following schedule:

       If the debt is paid in full during:

       * Year 1: 25%
       * Year 2: 22%
       * Year 3: 19%
       * Year 4: 16%
       * Year 5: 13%
       * Year 6: 10%
       * Year 7: 7%

    The major creditors have indicated that each of the three
alternatives are acceptable to each of them and should be
incorporated into what will be a consensual plan.

  * Interest holders will be treated as follows:  Seaview will
retain its 38.2% ownership interest in Debtor and retain its first
position.  TICC will retain its' 58.5% ownership interest in Debtor
and retain its' second position.  The minority shareholders as a
group will retain their 2.3% ownership interest in Debtor.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/Genutec_Biz_Plan_DS.pdf

                About Genutec Business Solutions

Genutec Business Solutions, Inc., is a holding company, and the
parent of subsidiary Rapid Notify, Inc.  Rapid has approximately
148 active contracts with government related entities to notify
their subscribers in the event of emergencies.  58.5% of its' stock
is owned by TICC Capital Corp., an investment company that holds a
second lien on any assets, and 39.2% of the stock is owned by
Seaview Mezzanine Fund, LP which holds a first lien on any assets.

Genutec filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 14-13115) in Santa Ana, Georgia, on May 16, 2014.  David
Montoya signed the petition as director.  Judge Erithe A. Smith
presides over the case.

The Debtor disclosed assets of $12,851,544 and liabilities of
$11,529,199.  

Michael R Totaro, Esq., at Totaro & Shanahan, in Pacific Palisades,
California, acts as bankruptcy counsel.  

The U.S. Trustee for Region 16 appointed three creditors to serve
on the official committee of unsecured creditors.



GETTY IMAGES: Bank Debt Trades at 27% Off
-----------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Getty Images Inc.
is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 73.08
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, July 17, 2015,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing and
reported in the July 23, 2015, edition of The Wall Street Journal.
This represents an increase of 0.79 percentage points from the
previous week, The Journal relates. Getty Images Inc. pays 350
basis points above LIBOR to borrow under the facility.  The bank
loan matures on October 14, 2019, and carries Moody's B2 rating and
Standard & Poor's B- rating.  The loan is one of the biggest
gainers and losers among 234 widely quoted syndicated loans with
five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended July 17.



GLC LIMITED: Hybrid "Good Faith" Test Adopted in Suit vs. Hunter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Timothy S. Black of the United States District Court for
Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, adopts the three-step
hybrid objective-subjective test in determining "good faith" under
Sections 548(c) and 550(b) of the Bankruptcy Code in the
consolidated adversary proceedings that arose from a Ponzi scheme
perpetrated by the former principals of GLC Limited.

The issue to be tried in the case is whether Defendants Hunter
Miller Family, LLC, et al., can establish their defenses to the
avoidance powers of the Plan Administrator per Section 548(a)(1)(A)
by satisfying the elements of Sections 548(c) and 550(b).  To
establish a statutory defense under either section, the Defendants
are required to show that the transfers were taken "for value" and
"in good faith."

The adversary proceeding is GLC LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. HUNTER
MILLER FAMILY, LLC, et al., Defendants, Case No. 1:15-CV-23, (S.D.
Ohio).

A full-text copy of Judge Black's Order dated July 10, 2015,
available at http://is.gd/IO8FH9from Leagle.com.

James C. Frooman, Esq. -- jfrooman@fbtlaw.com -- and Ryan Steven
Lett, Esq. -- rlett@fbtlaw.com -- of Frost Brown Todd LLC serve as
counsel for Plaintiff GLC Limited.

Andrew Michael Simon, Esq. -- andrew.simon@squirepb.com -- of
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP -- Stephen D. Lerner, Esq. --
stephen.lerner@squirepb.com -- of Squire Sanders and Armando J.
Rosell, Esq. -- rosell@lawokc.com -- of Mulinix Edwards Rosell &
GoerkerPLLC serve as counsel for Defendant Hunter Miller Family
LLC.


GLYECO INC: Signs Employment Agreement with CFO
-----------------------------------------------
GlyEco, Inc., entered into an employment and consulting agreement
with the Company's chief financial officer, Alicia Williams Young.

Pursuant to the Agreement, Ms. Williams Young will serve full-time
as the Company's Chief Financial Officer through Aug. 15, 2015,
during which time she will be responsible for the preparation and
filing of the Company's Form 10-Q filing for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2015.  For the remainder of August, Ms. Williams
Young will serve as a full-time consultant to the Company, and for
the month of September, she will work 30 hours per week.  As a
consultant, she will provide guidance regarding the Company's
accounting and IT activities.  The Agreement terminates on
Sept. 30, 2015.

In consideration for her services, the Company will compensate Ms.
Williams Young with monthly compensation of $10,000 per month
through Aug. 31, 2015, and $7,500 per month through Sept. 30, 2015.
During the month of September, any hours in excess of 30 hours per
week will be billed at $250 per hour.  Upon the successful
completion of Ms. Williams Young's engagement, she will be issued
30,000 shares of restricted stock valued as of the effective date
of the agreement.  Additionally, all of Ms. Williams Young's vested
stock options and warrants will remain exercisable for a term of
one year following the termination of the agreement.

                         About GlyEco, Inc.

Phoenix, Ariz.-based GlyEco, Inc., is a green chemistry company
formed to roll-out its proprietary and patent pending glycol
recycling technology that transforms waste glycols, a hazardous
material, into profitable green products.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $16.6 million in total
assets, $2.48 million in total liabilities and $14.09 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Glyeco reported a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$8.73 million on $5.89 million of net sales for the year ended Dec.
31, 2014, compared with a net loss of $4 million on $5.53 million
of net sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2013.

Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP, in Phoenix, Arizona, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has yet to
achieve profitable operations and is dependent on its ability to
raise capital from stockholders or other sources to sustain
operations and to ultimately achieve viable operations. These
factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


GREEN MOUNTAIN: Big Sky, Mid South Compete for Assets
-----------------------------------------------------
Green Mountain Management, LLC, and its affiliated Debtors ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta
Division, to approve the sale of substantially all of their assets
to Big Sky Environmental LLC for $2.4 million.

The Purchase Agreement contains, among others, the following
terms:

   (1) The consideration consists of (a) cash in the amount of $2.4
million; plus (b) the assumption by the Stalking Horse Purchaser of
Debtors' obligations with respect to the Bonds and certain other
liabilities of the Debtors as set forth in the Purchase Agreement;
and (c) the payment of the Cure Amount relating to the Designated
Contracts.

   (2) The $2.4 million cash component of the Purchase Price will
be allocated as follows: first, the sum of $100,000 to the
Bankruptcy Estate; second, up to $2 million to repay amounts
outstanding at closing under the Debtors' DIP loan held by Bay
Point Capital Lenders, LP; and third, the balance of such cash to
pay down past due interest on the Bonds.

   (3) Upon execution of the Purchase Agreement, the Stalking Horse
Purchaser will provide a $250,000 good faith deposit, which is
refundable as set forth in the Bidding Procedures and Purchase
Agreement.

Richard B. Herzog, Jr., Esq., at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
LLP, in Atlanta, Georgia, tells the Court that the Stalking Horse
Term Sheet and the Purchase Agreement were negotiated in good faith
and at arm's length, and the Debtors believe the terms of the
transaction are fair and reasonable under all of the circumstances.
He believes that the proposed Bidding Procedures and marketing
process will provide sufficient time and opportunity for any other
interested party to submit a higher or otherwise better offer for
the Debtors' assets.

Mid South Disposal, LLC, with the support of CWI Enterprises, LLC,
and Bay Point Capital Partners, LP, filed a notice of competing
stalking horse bid.  John A. Christy, Esq., at Schreeder, Wheeler &
Flint, LLP in Atlanta, Georgia, tells the Court that MSD has
delivered an Asset Purchase Agreement to the Debtors and the
holders of the Bonds, which contains the following enhancements:
(a) the purchase price is $2.5 million of $100,000 higher; (b)
there is no $300,000 break up fee; (c) the due diligence expense
reimbursement is $100,000, a reduction of $50,000; and (d) all
Chapter 5 claims against all parties, other than Green Mountain
Aggregates, LLC and Daniel A. Cowart, are left to the estate for
the benefit of unsecured creditors.  Mr. Christy asserts that MSD's
bid is better and higher than the proposed stalking horse bid of
Big Sky and that MSD should be selected as the stalking horse
bidder.

Green Mountain Management, LLC and its affiliated Debtors are
represented by:

          Richard B. Herzog, Jr., Esq.
          NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP
          201 17th Street, NW, Suite 1700
          Atlanta, GA 30363
          Telephone: (404)322-6000
          Facsimile: (404)322-6050
          Email: richard.herzog@nelsonmullins.com
               
Mid South Disposal, LLC is represented by:

          John A. Christy, Esq.
          SCHREEDER, WHEELER & FLINT, LLP
          Suite 800
          Atlanta, GA 30309-4516
          Telephone: (404)681-3450
          Facsimile: (404)681-1046
          Email: jchristy@swfllp.com

                       About Green Mountain

Green Mountain Management, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 14-64287) on July 25, 2014. The
petition was signed by Daniel B. Cowart, sole member of Georgia
Flattop Partners, LLC, and chairman of Green Mountain Management,
LLC.  The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and
debt.  Georgia Flattop Partners, LLC is the managing member and
holders of 93% of the stock.

The case is assigned to Judge Barbara Ellis-Monro.

The Debtor is represented by Sage M. Sigler, Esq., at Alston &
Bird, LLP, in Atlanta.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed,
and UMB Bank, n.a.'s request for the appointment of a trustee was
resolved consensually pursuant to this Court's order entered on
Nov. 20, 2014.


HAMPTON ROADS: Moody's Gives Ba1 Rating on Ser. 2007A Class I Bonds
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has taken various actions on
approximately $274 million of Hampton Roads PPV, LLC Military
Housing Taxable Revenue Bonds, 2007 Series A. The rating actions
are as follows:

Affirmed Ba1 rating on approximately $207.6 million of outstanding
Class I bonds;

Affirmed B1 rating on approximately $57.2 million of outstanding
Class II bonds;

Affirmed B1 rating on approximately $8.9 million of outstanding
Class III bonds; and

Revised the outlook on the ratings to stable from negative.

SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE

The ratings affirmation reflects the Project's overall adequate but
volatile debt service coverage ratios (DSCR), high occupancy rate,
and the presence of the Excess Collateral Funding Agreement (ECFA)
with AIG Financial Products Corporation. The ratings; however,
remain vulnerable to changes in Allowance for Basic Housing (BAH),
higher turnover rate driven by ships deployments, and lack of
satisfactory debt service reserve fund (DSRF) to mitigate changes
in net operating income.

OUTLOOK

The outlook revision to stable from negative reflects our
expectation that the high increase in the 2015 BAH rate coupled
with management's efforts to control expenses will result in the
rebound in the debt service coverage levels.

WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO UP:

While an upgrade at this time is not being considered due to the
volatility of the Project's performance, one, however, would
require sustained improvement in operating performance and/or cash
funding of DSRF or replacement of current surety provider with
another of higher credit quality.

WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO DOWN:

The rating could be downgraded if the project experiences a decline
in DSCR due to shortfall in rental income, higher expenses and/or
an unforeseen event.

OBLIGOR PROFILE

The Issuer and Borrower, is Hampton Roads PPV, LLC a limited
liability company. The issuer has two members: Homeport Hampton
Roads, LLC, (HHR), Managing Member, and The United States of
America, Department of the Navy (DON). HHR has two members: Hunt
ELP LTD. An affiliate of Hunt Building Company, and ACC OP (Hampton
Roads), LLC, an affiliate of American Campus Communities Inc.
(ACC). Hampton Roads PPV, LLC was created on December 2007, under
the PPP program. It contracted with the DOD for the acquisition,
development, management and operation of the Project located in
Norfolk and Newport News, Virginia. The term of the contract is 50
years, expiring in 2057.

LEGAL SECURITY

The Bonds are limited obligations of the Issuer, Hampton Roads PPV
LLC, payable solely from the assets and revenues pledged under the
Indenture, including revenues generated by the operation of the
residential rental housing units, and a first mortgage lien on the
Issuer's leasehold interest in the Project land and a first
mortgage lien on the Project improvements. The revenues consist
primarily of deposit into the Indenture of the military BAH for
military tenants.


HAVEN HOUSE: Case Summary & 8 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: The Haven House, Inc.
        653 Main St N
        Cambridge, MN 55008

Case No.: 15-42579

Nature of Business: Housing with Services to Seniors

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 23, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Minnesota (Minneapolis)

Judge: Hon. Gregory F Kishel

Debtor's Counsel: Robert Kalenda, Esq.
                  KALENDA & ASSOC
                  919 W St Germain St Ste 2000
                  St. Cloud, MN 56301
                  Tel: 320-255-8840
                  Email: info@kalendalaw.com

Total Assets: $130,988

Total Liabilities: $2.2 million

The petition was signed by Scott Kent, president.

A list of the Debtor's eight largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/mnb15-42579.pdf


HD SUPPLY: May Seek Amendments to Outstanding Credit Agreements
---------------------------------------------------------------
HD Supply, Inc., disclosed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that it may seek opportunistically amendments to one or
more agreements governing its outstanding indebtedness.  The
seeking of any such amendment is subject to market conditions,
among other factors.  The Company gives no assurances that any
amendment will be sought, or, if sought, will be completed.

                          About HD Supply
  
HD Supply, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is one of the
largest North American wholesale distributors supporting
residential and non-residential construction and to a lesser
extent electrical consumption and repair and remodeling.  HDS also
provides maintenance, repair and operations services.  Its
businesses are organized around three segments: Infrastructure and
Energy; Maintenance, Repair & Improvement; and, Specialty
Construction.  HDS operates through approximately 800 locations
throughout the U.S. and Canada serving contractors, government
entities, maintenance professionals, home builders and
professional businesses.

As of May 3, 2015, HD Supply had $6.3 billion in total assets, $6.8
billion in total liabilities and a $498 million total stockholders'
deficit.

                           *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Jan. 11, 2013, Moody's Investors Service
upgraded HD Supply's corporate family rating to 'B3' from 'Caa1'.
"This rating action results from our expectations that HDS will
refinance a significant portion of its senior subordinated notes
due 2015, effectively extending the remainder of its maturities by
at least two years to 2017," Moody's said.

HD Supply carries a 'B' corporate credit rating, with negative
outlook, from Standard & Poor's Ratings Services.


HELIA TEC: Heather Potts Designated as Ch. 11 Plan Agent
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge David R. Jones of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, granted the Helia Tec
Resources, Inc.'s motion to approve Heather Rene Potts as Plan
Agent.

The Debtor explained that it needs the appointment and approval of
Heather Potts as plan agent so she can expeditiously move to
liquidate the Debtor pursuant to the 2nd Amended Plan. Heather
Potts is a licensed Texas attorney who remains in good standing
with the State Texas Bar. She has previously represented Chapter 7
Trustees along with other interested parties in bankruptcy
proceedings, and is more than familiar with procedural and legal
operations in the bankruptcy system and with regard to this Court.
Heather Potts is not aligned with nor has she represented the
Debtor or any of the parties to this bankruptcy.

Helia Tec Resources, Inc. is represented by:

          Richard A. Battaglia, Esq.
          P.O. Box 131276
          Houston, Texas 77219-1276
          Tel.: 713 521 – 3570
          Fax: 713 521 -3573
          Email: rab@rabpc.com

                   About Helia Tec Resources

Helia Tec Resources, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S. D.
Tex. Case No. 13-36251) on Oct. 3, 2013 in Houston, Texas,
represented by Richard L. Fuqua, II, Esq., at Fuqua & Associates,
PC, in Houston, as counsel to the Debtor. The Debtor listed $16.15
million in assets and $2.24 million in liabilities. The petition
was signed by Cary E. Hughes, president.

Judy A. Robbins, U.S. Trustee for Region 7, was unable to appoint
an official committee of unsecured creditors in the Debtor's case.


HERCULES OFFSHORE: Announces Second Quarter 2015 Results
--------------------------------------------------------
Hercules Offshore, Inc., reported a net loss of $88.3 million on
$79.2 million of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2015,
compared to net income of $6.6 million on $242.9 million of revenue
for the same period in 2014.

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company reported a net
loss of $145.3 million on $201.8 million of revenue compared to net
income of $26.5 million on $499.7 million of revenue for the same
period last year.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $1.8 billion in total assets,
$1.4 billion in total liabilities and $471.9 million in
stockholders' equity.

John T. Rynd, chief executive officer and president of Hercules
Offshore stated, "Second quarter results reflect the weak operating
conditions across the offshore services sector as well the impact
of our resolution with Saudi Aramco for our three rigs in the
Middle East.  The latest pullback in the price of oil is likely to
delay any improvement in worldwide activity levels well into 2016.
The limited visibility and challenging market conditions that we
expect to persist for some time drove our decision to restructure
our capital base.  As previously disclosed, we have reached an
agreement with the majority of our noteholders, and anticipate
obtaining final approval of our restructuring plan in late October.
We also continue to aggressively reduce costs without compromising
the safety of our employees or the quality of our services.  By
controlling costs and establishing a stronger balance sheet, we
will be better positioned to weather this protracted downturn and
possibly capitalize on opportunities that may arise in such
industry conditions."

Domestic Offshore

Revenue generated from Domestic Offshore for the second quarter
2015 decreased 71% to $40.6 million from $140.4 million in the
second quarter 2014, driven by lower utilization and dayrates on a
reduced marketed rig fleet.  Operating days during the second
quarter 2015 declined to 439 days with utilization of 53.6% on a
marketed fleet of 9 rigs, compared to 1,297 days on 18 marketed
rigs at 79.2% utilization during the second quarter 2014.  Average
revenue per rig per day decreased to $92,538 in the second quarter
2015 from $108,237 in the comparable 2014 period.  Operating
expenses of $26.4 million in the second quarter 2015 include a net
loss of $3.4 million related to asset sales, including the Hercules
85, 153, 203, 206, 207 and 211, compared to expenses of $63.5
million in the second quarter 2014, which includes a gain of $7.4
million from the sale of the Hercules 250 and 2002.  The
significant reduction in operating expenses in the current quarter,
after adjusting for asset sales, was largely attributable to the
reduced number of fully crewed rigs in operation.  Domestic
Offshore reported operating income of $1.4 million in the second
quarter 2015, compared to $57.3 million in the second quarter 2014,
including the aforementioned asset sale gains and losses.

International Offshore

International Offshore revenue of $17.5 million in the second
quarter 2015 includes a $13.4 million adjustment related to
retroactive dayrate concessions on the Hercules 261, 262 and 266
made on their existing contracts with Saudi Aramco, and compares to
revenue of $71.7 million in the second quarter 2014. Utilization
decreased to 50.0% in the second quarter 2015 from 62.5% in the
second quarter 2014, largely due to idle time on the Hercules
Triumph, Hercules Resilience and Hercules 208, partially offset by
higher utilization on the Hercules 261 and Hercules 260. Average
revenue per rig per day decreased to $47,975 in the second quarter
2015 from $157,637 in the second quarter of 2014, driven largely by
idle time on the Hercules Resilience and Hercules Triumph, lower
renegotiated dayrates on the three rigs working for Saudi Aramco,
as well as the retroactive dayrate adjustments on these three rigs.
Operating expense decreased to $35.5 million in the second quarter
2015, from $44.1 million in the respective 2014 period, which
includes a $10.5 million gain on the sale of Hercules 258.  This
reduction in operating expense was driven in part by lower costs on
the Hercules 261 and 262 as well as lower costs incurred on the
idle rigs.  International Offshore recorded an operating loss of
$40.5 million in the second quarter 2015 compared to operating
income of $6.7 million in the prior year period, including the
aforementioned rig sale gain.

International Liftboats

International Liftboats revenue declined to $21.2 million in the
second quarter 2015 from $30.9 million in the prior year period,
due to lower utilization and dayrates. Second quarter 2015
utilization declined to 49.7% from 61.0% in the respective 2014
period.  Average revenue per liftboat per day decreased 16% to
$20,329 in the second quarter 2015 from $24,162 in the second
quarter 2014, primarily due to market pressure on dayrates.
Operating expenses in the second quarter 2015 declined by 21% to
$15.0 million, compared to $19.1 million in the second quarter
2014, reflecting lower activity levels and the impact of our cost
reduction measures.  International Liftboats recorded operating
income of $0.8 million in the second quarter 2015 compared to an
operating loss of $0.7 million in the second quarter 2014, which
includes approximately $5.3 million of bad debt expense.

                       About Hercules Offshore

Hercules Offshore Inc. (NASDAQ: HERO) --
http://www.herculesoffshore.com/-- provides shallow-water         

drilling and marine services to the oil and natural gas
exploration and production industry in the United States, Gulf of
Mexico and internationally.  The Company provides these services
to integrated energy companies, independent oil and natural gas
operators and national oil companies.  The Company operates in six
business segments: Domestic Offshore, International Offshore,
Inland, Domestic Liftboats, International Liftboats and Delta
Towing.

Hercules Offshore reported a net loss of $216 million in 2014,
compared with a net loss of $68.1 million in 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $1.93 billion in total
assets, $1.37 billion in total liabilities and $559 million in
stockholders' equity.

                           *     *     *

The TCR reported in March 2015 that Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Hercules Offshore, Inc.'s Corporate Family Rating to
Caa2 from B2.  The Caa2 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) reflects the
company's contract roll-off and sparse contract coverage through
the June 2016, its aging fleet, and the projection for a
deterioration of its liquidity position.

As reported by the TCR on June 22, 2015, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services lowered its corporate credit rating on Houston-based
offshore driller Hercules Offshore Inc. to 'CC' from 'CCC+'.
The downgrade follows the Company's announcement that it has
entered into a restructuring support agreement with a steering
group of the company's senior noteholders, collectively owning or
controlling in excess of 67% of the aggregate outstanding principal
amount of the company's 10.25% senior notes due 2019, 8.75% senior
notes due 2021, 7.5% senior notes due 2021, and 6.75% senior notes
due 2022.


HERCULES OFFSHORE: Posts $88.3-Mil. Net Loss for Second Quarter
---------------------------------------------------------------
Hercules Offshore, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $88.3 million on $79.2 million of revenue for the three months
ended June 30, 2015, compared to net income of $6.6 million on $243
million of revenue for the same period in 2014.

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company reported a net
loss of $145 million on $202 million of revenue compared to net
income of $26.5 million on $499.6 million of revenue for the same
period last year.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $1.8 billion in total assets,
$1.3 billion in total liabilities and $472 million in stockholders'
equity.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       http://is.gd/8NpS2e

                      About Hercules Offshore

Hercules Offshore Inc. (NASDAQ: HERO) --
http://www.herculesoffshore.com/-- provides shallow-water         

drilling and marine services to the oil and natural gas
exploration and production industry in the United States, Gulf of
Mexico and internationally.  The Company provides these services
to integrated energy companies, independent oil and natural gas
operators and national oil companies.  The Company operates in six
business segments: Domestic Offshore, International Offshore,
Inland, Domestic Liftboats, International Liftboats and Delta
Towing.

Hercules Offshore reported a net loss of $216 million in 2014,
compared with a net loss of $68.1 million in 2013.

                           *     *     *

The TCR reported in March 2015 that Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Hercules Offshore, Inc.'s Corporate Family Rating to
Caa2 from B2.  The Caa2 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) reflects the
company's contract roll-off and sparse contract coverage through
the June 2016, its aging fleet, and the projection for a
deterioration of its liquidity position.

As reported by the TCR on June 22, 2015, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services lowered its corporate credit rating on Houston-based
offshore driller Hercules Offshore Inc. to 'CC' from 'CCC+'.
The downgrade follows the Company's announcement that it has
entered into a restructuring support agreement with a steering
group of the company's senior noteholders, collectively owning or
controlling in excess of 67% of the aggregate outstanding principal
amount of the company's 10.25% senior notes due 2019, 8.75% senior
notes due 2021, 7.5% senior notes due 2021, and 6.75% senior notes
due 2022.


INTERLEUKIN GENETICS: Stockholders Elect Three Directors
--------------------------------------------------------
At the annual meeting of Interleukin Genetics, Inc.'s stockholders
held on July 21, 2015, the stockholders:

   (1) elected Lionel Carnot, Roger C. Colman and James M. Weaver
       as Class III directors for a three-year term expiring at
       the Company's 2018 annual meeting;

   (2) ratified the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the
       Company's independent public accounting firm for the fiscal
       year ending Dec. 31, 2015;

   (3) approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the
       Company's named executive officers;

   (4) approved an amendment to the Company's 2013 Employee,
       Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan to increase
       the number of shares of common stock available for issuance
       thereunder by 30,000,000 shares;

   (5) approved an amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate
       of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized
       shares of common stock from 300,000,000 to 450,000,000 at
       any time prior to the earlier of (i) Aug. 1, 2016, and (ii)
       the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders; and

   (6) approved an amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate
       of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split by
       combining outstanding shares of the Company's common stock
       into a lesser number of outstanding shares by a ratio of
       not less than 1-for-5 and not more than 1-for-40 at any
       time prior to the earlier of (i) Aug. 1, 2016, and (ii) the
       2016 annual meeting of stockholders, with the exact ratio
       to be set within this range by the Company's Board of
       Directors in its sole discretion.

On July 21, 2015, at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
Interleukin Genetics, Inc., the shareholders approved an amendment
to the Company's 2013 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity
Incentive Plan, to increase the number of shares of common stock
available for issuance thereunder by 30,000,000 shares.

On July 21, 2015, the Company filed a certificate of amendment to
its Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to increase the number
of authorized shares of the Company's common stock from 300,000,000
to 450,000,000.

                         About Interleukin

Waltham, Mass.-based Interleukin Genetics, Inc., is a personalized
health company that develops unique genetic tests to provide
information to better manage health and specific health risks.

Grant Thornton LLP, in Boston, Massachusetts, issued a "going
concern" qualification in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the
Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and has an
accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $11.5 million in total
assets, $8.66 million in total liabilities, and $2.82 million in
total stockholders' equity.


INTERLINE BRANDS: S&P Puts 'B' CCR on CreditWatch Positive
----------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said it placed its ratings on
Interline Brands Inc. (Delaware Corp), including its 'B' corporate
credit rating, on CreditWatch with positive implications.

The CreditWatch placement follows Interline's announcement that it
has agreed to be acquired by Home Depot for $1.625 billion in cash.
Home Depot expects to complete the acquisition in its fiscal third
quarter, which ends on Nov. 1, 2015.  The acquisition is subject to
applicable regulatory approval and customary closing conditions,
including the repayment of Interline's outstanding senior notes.

"We will resolve the CreditWatch placement at the close of Home
Depot's acquisition of Interline," said Standard & Poor's credit
analyst Maurice Austin.


ISTAR FINANCIAL: Extends Tender Offer Expiration Date to July 31
----------------------------------------------------------------
iStar Financial Inc. is extending the expiration date of its tender
offer until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 31, 2015, unless
further extended.  The Offer had been previously scheduled to
expire at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on July 27, 2015.

On or about July 24, 2015, the Company advised the holders of HPU
Shares of the extension of the Offer by email communication.

The Company is ofering holders of up to 4,937.5 shares of High
Performance Common Stock-Series 1, 5,000 shares of Company's High
Performance Common Stock-Series 2 and 4,950 shares of High
Performance Common Stock-Series 3 issued and outstanding as of June
11, 2015, the opportunity to exchange those HPU Shares for the Cash
Consideration or the Stock Consideration.  

The "Stock Consideration" is the number of shares of the Company's
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, equal to the product of:
(i) the aggregate number of Common Stock Equivalents that are
attributable to the HPU Shares tendered in the Offer by a holder of
HPU Shares, multiplied by (ii) 0.565371, which represents $8.00 of
Shares based on the last reported sale price for the Shares on the
New York Stock Exchange on June 11, 2015 (which was $14.15).

"Cash Consideration" is the amount of cash equal to the product of:
(i) the aggregate number of Common Stock Equivalents that are
attributable to the HPU Shares that you tender in the Offer,
multiplied by (ii) $8.00.

                      About iStar Financial

New York-based iStar Financial Inc. (NYSE: SFI) provides custom-
tailored investment capital to high-end private and corporate
owners of real estate, including senior and mezzanine real estate
debt, senior and mezzanine corporate capital, as well as corporate
net lease financing and equity.  The Company, which is taxed as a
real estate investment trust, provides innovative and value added
financing solutions to its customers.

iStar Financial reported a net loss allocable to common
shareholders of $33.72 million in 2014, a net loss allocable to
common shareholders of $155.76 million in 2013 and a net loss
allocable to common shareholders of $272.99 million in 2012.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $5.65 billion in total
assets, $4.41 billion in total liabilities, $13.2 million in
redeemable noncontrolling interests, and $1.21 billion in total
equity.

                            *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on June 26, 2014, Fitch Ratings had
affirmed the Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of iStar Financial
at 'B'.  The 'B' IDR is driven by improvements in the company's
leverage, continued demonstrated access to the capital markets and
new sources of growth capital and material reductions in non-
performing loans (NPLs).

As reported by the TCR on Oct. 5, 2012, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services affirmed its 'B+' long-term issuer credit rating on iStar
Financial.

In October 2012, Moody's Investors Service upgraded the corporate
family rating to 'B2' from 'B3'.  The current rating reflects the
REIT's success in extending near term debt maturities and
improving fundamentals in commercial real estate.  The ratings on
the October 2012 senior secured credit facility takes into account
the asset coverage, the size and quality of the collateral pool,
and the term of facility.


JAMES RIVER: Mine Service's Setoff Request Denied
-------------------------------------------------
Judge Kevin R. Huennekens of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, denied a
motion filed by Mine Service Company, Inc. to lift the automatic
stay imposed in the Chapter 11 cases of James River Coal Company
and its subsidiaries.

Mine Service held a number of sales tax refunds totaling
approximately $112,735, which it received postpetition from the
Commonwealth of Kentucky on behalf of the Debtors.

Mine Service argued that it held the tax refunds in its individual
capacity.  As such, mutuality is satisfied and Mine Service should
be permitted to effect an offset against the amount owed to it by
the Debtors on account of unpaid invoices for goods sold to the
Debtors prepetition.

Judge Huennekens, however, held that Mine Service has failed to
satisfy the requirements necessary to effect a right of setoff
under Bankruptcy Code Section 553. He found that the mutuality
requirement was not satisfied because Mine Service is merely acting
as a conduit between the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the Debtors.
He further found that Mine Service was attempting to setoff a
prepetition debt against a postpetition obligation. Accordingly,
Mine Service is not entitled to setoff the tax refunds and is
obligated to return the amount of tax refunded to the Debtor.

The case is MINE SERVICE COMPANY, INC., Movant, v. JAMES RIVER COAL
COMPANY, et al., Respondents, relating to IN RE: JAMES RIVER COAL
COMPANY, et al., Chapter 11, Debtors, CASE NO. 14-31848-KRH,
(Bankr. E.D. Va.).

A full-text copy of Judge Huennekens' July 16, 2015 memorandum
opinion is available at http://is.gd/ceJuZKfrom Leagle.com.

                           About James River

James River Coal Company is a producer and marketer of coal in the
Central Appalachia ("CAPP") and the Midwest coal regions of the
United States.  James River's principal business is the mining,
preparation and sale of metallurgical coal, thermal coal (which is
also known as steam coal) and specialty coal.

James River and 33 of its affiliates filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case Nos. 14-31848 to 14-31886) in
Richmond, Virginia, on April 7, 2014.  The petitions were signed
by Peter T. Socha as president and chief executive officer.
Judge Kevin R. Huennekens oversees the Chapter 11 cases.

On the petition date, James River Coal disclosed total assets of
$1.06 billion and total liabilities of $818.6 million.

The Debtors are represented by Tyler P. Brown, Esq., Henry P.
(Toby) Long, III, Esq., and Justin F. Paget, Esq. at Hunton &
Williams LLP of Richmond, VA and Marwill S. Huebner, Esq, Brian
M. Resnick, Esq., and Michelle M. McGreal, Esq. at Davis Polk &
Wardwell LLP of New York, NY.  Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
serves as the Debtors' special counsel.  Perella Weinberg Partners
L.P. is the Debtors' financial advisor.  Deutsche Bank Securities
Inc. serves as the Debtors' investment banker and M&G advisor.
Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, acts as the debtors' notice,
claims and administrative agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 4 has appointed five creditors to the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  Michael S. Stamer,
Esq., Alexis Freeman, Esq., and Jack M. Tracy II, Esq., at Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP; and Jonathan L. Gold, Esq.,
Christopher L. Perkins, Esq., and Christian K. Vogel, Esq., at
LeClairRyan.

The Debtors, in August 2014, won authority to sell the Hampden
Mining Complex (including the assets of Logan & Kanawha Coal
Company, LLC), the Hazard Mining Complex (other than the assets of
Laurel Mountain Resources LLC) and the Triad Mining Complex for
$52 million plus the assumption of certain environmental and other
liabilities, to a unit of Blackhawk Mining.  The Buyer is
represented by Mitchell A. Seider, Esq., and Charles E. Carpenter,
Esq., at Latham & Watkins LLP.


JARDEN CORP: S&P Affirms 'BB' Corporate Credit Rating
-----------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'BBB-' issue-level
rating to Florida-based Jarden Corp.'s proposed $300 million senior
secured term loan B-2 due 2022.  The 'BBB-' issue-level rating on
the company's upsized $1.05 billion senior secured term loan B-1,
which includes a $300 million add-on, is unchanged.  The recovery
rating on both term loans is '1', indicating that lenders could
expect very high recovery (90%-100%) in the event of payment
default.  S&P expects the proceeds of the term loan B-1 add-on and
the new term loan B-2 to be used in conjunction with cash from
Jarden's recent equity issuance to fund the purchase of Waddington
Group Inc.  S&P expects the company the company to raise gross
proceeds of at least $870 million from the equity offering.  The
ratings are subject to change, and assume the transaction closes on
substantially the same terms presented to S&P.

All of S&P's existing ratings on the company, including the 'BB'
corporate credit rating, are unchanged by this proposed
transaction.  The outlook is stable.  Pro forma for the proposed
financing, total debt outstanding is approximately $5.6 billion.

Jarden's ratings reflect its strong position across a diversified
portfolio of niche consumer products, small appliances, household
products, outdoor products, and sports equipment.  The company has
well-recognized brand names, including Yankee Candle, Rawlings,
Coleman, Sunbeam, K2, and Mr. Coffee.  S&P believes the company is
a category captain with many of its products and is an important
strategic supplier to leading retailers such as Wal-Mart and
Target.  Jarden has an extensive global distribution network and
derives more than 35% of its sales from outside the U.S., which S&P
believes will increase in the coming years.  These factors support
S&P's "satisfactory" business risk assessment.

S&P's ratings also reflect Jarden's high debt levels and active
acquisition and share repurchase strategy.  The company has raised
a significant amount of equity to fund the acquisition of
Waddington Group, resulting in very modest credit ratio
deterioration.  S&P believes the company will maintain leverage
between 4.0x to 4.5x and funds from operations (FFO) to debt in the
mid-teens.

RATINGS LIST

Jarden Corp.
Corporate credit rating                   BB/Stable/--

Rating Assigned
Jarden Corp.
Senior secured
  $300 mil. term loan B-2 due 2022         BBB-
   Recovery rating                         1

Ratings Unchanged
Senior secured
  $1.05 bil. term loan B-1                 BBB-
   Recovery rating                         1


JEFFREY J. PROSSER: Bid to Disqualify Ch. 7 Trustee's Attys Denied
------------------------------------------------------------------
Chief District Judge Wilma A. Lewis of the United States District
Court for the District of Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas
and St. John, denied Jeffrey J. Prosser's motion to disqualify the
attorneys that represent the trustee in his Chapter 7 case.

Mr. Prosser argues that the Court should disqualify the Trustee's
named attorneys and their law firm, Fox Rothschild, LLP, pursuant
to Local Rule 83.1(b)(2).  That Rule provides in pertinent part
that "[a]n attorney may be admitted pro hac vice in no more than a
total of three (3) cases in any calendar year and may not be
further admitted at any time if such attorney is then admitted pro
hac vice in three (3) active cases regardless of when such
admissions occurred."  Mr. Prosser also relies on the Supreme Court
of the Virgin Islands' interpretation of its own rule regarding pro
hac vice admissions.  

The Trustee opposes Mr. Prosser's Motion on the grounds that: (1)
the cases in which the named attorneys and their law firm have
appeared are primarily "adversary proceedings" arising from related
bankruptcy cases; (2) Mr. Prosser has waived any objection to the
pro hac vice admissions; (3) the Supreme Court of the Virgin
Islands has no authority to regulate the practice of law in this
Court; and (4) disqualification would greatly prejudice the Trustee
at this stage of the proceedings.

Judge Lewis denied the motion to disqualify, finding that the
Trustee will be greatly prejudiced by the disqualification of his
already-admitted counsel at this stage of the proceedings.  Judge
Lewis noted that since 2008, counsel for the Trustee has handled
all aspects of the matters in the Bankruptcy Court, as well as all
the adversary proceedings and appeals.  As a result, counsel has
become "intimately familiar with the legal and factual issues of
this case."  Thus, to disqualify counsel at this stage of the
proceedings would result in "extreme and unfair prejudice" to the
Trustee.  This is particularly so because "it is doubtful that [the
Trustee] could find capable substitute counsel without substantial
delay."

The bankruptcy case is In re: Jeffrey J. Prosser, Chapter 7,
Debtor, Bankruptcy No.: 06-30009 (Bankr. D.V.I.).

The adversary proceeding is STAN SPRINGEL, CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE OF
THE ESTATE OF INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION CORPORATION, AND JAMES P.
CARROLL, AS CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY J. PROSSER,
Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. JEFFREY J. PROSSER, DAWN PROSSER, JUSTIN
PROSSER, MICHAEL PROSSER, SYBIL G. PROSSER, MICHELLE LABENNETT, AND
LYNDON A. PROSSER, Defendants/Appellants, ADV. PRO. NO. 07-03010,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2013-0087., 2013-0057, 2013-0056, 2013-0010,
(D.V.I.).

A full-text copy of Judge Lewis' Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
July 14, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/ciPFptfrom
Leagle.com.

Yann Geron, Esq. -- ygeron@foxrothschild.com -- William H. Stassen,
Esq. -- wstassen@foxrothschild.com -- and Samuel H. Israel, Esq.
-- sisrael@foxrothschild.com -- of Fox Rothschild LLP serve as
counsel for the Plaintiff/Appellee James P. Carroll, Chapter 7
Trustee.

Robert F. Craig, Esq., of Craig Law Firm, Norman A. Abood, Esq. --
norman@nabood.com -- and Lawrence H. Schoenbach, Esq. --
schoenbachlawoffice@att.net -- of Law Offices of Lawrence H.
Schoenbach PLLC serve as counsel for the Defendant/Appellant
Jeffrey J. Prosser.


JOSEPH UVINO: BofA's Bid to Appoint Receiver Denied
---------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas F. Whelan of the Supreme Court for Suffolk County
denied Bank of America, N.A.'s motion for the appointment of
receiver and denied Debtors Joseph Uvino and Wendy Uvino's motion
to dismiss the foreclosure action filed by the bank against them.

Judge Whelan, while denying the Uvinos' motion for an order
dismissing the action as abandoned, granted its alternative demands
for an order vacating any technical default in answering or for
leave to serve a late answer to the extent that any default in
answering on the part of the Uvino defendants was waived by the
plaintiff's failure to reject the answer served in December of
2012.  Accordingly, Judge Whelan gives the plaintiff 45 days to
file a reply to the defendants' counterclaim or to undertake other
proceedings it deems advisable with respect thereto.

The case is BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH UVINO, WENDY
UVINO, POOLS BY PAUL GUILLO, INC., KOLB MECHANICAL CORPORATION, J.
BARROWS, INC., EXCELSIOR P&H, INC., and "JOHN DOE" said name being
fictitious and intended to include any plaintiff, intended as being
persons, entities and all parties having or claiming an interest or
lien upon the mortgaged premises and not otherwise identified
above, Defendants, Case No. 29470-09, MOT. SEQ. NO. 006-MD.,
007-MOT D, (S.C. NY)

A full-text of Judge Thomas F. Whelan's Order dated June 22, 2015,
is available at http://is.gd/ja0JTVfrom Leagle.com.

BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL et al. serve as counsel for Plaintiff.

Devitt, Spellman, Barrett serve as counsel for Uvino.


KEVIN MILLER: Habeas Corpus Petition Dismissed with Prejudice
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Catherine D. Perry of the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, dismissed with
prejudice, Kevin Miller's petition for a writ of habeas corpus
under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241, for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction.  Judge Perry, however, granted the Petitioner's in
forma pauperis status.

Judge Perry held that 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 provides relief for
persons "in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or
treaties of the United States."  The Petitioner is not "in
custody," and therefore, he is not entitled to relief under Section
2241.

The case is KEVIN P. MILLER, Petitioner, v. U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT,
EIGTH CIRCUIT, EASTERN DISTRICT CASE NO. 15-43390-659, Respondent,
Case No. 15-43390-659 (E.D. Mo.)

A full-text copy of Judge Catherine D. Perry's Memorandum and Order
dated July 17, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/a0Lh04from
Leagle.com.


LAKE DEARBORN: Judge Allows Food Court Tenants' Rejection Claims
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jacqueline P. Cox of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, allowed the
claims filed by tenants at the food court in Chicago, Illinois,
whose leases had been rejected by Lake Dearborn, LLC, et al.

Dearborn Retail, LLC, owned the real property constituting the food
court space located at 201 N. Clark St., in Chicago, Illinois.  On
March 26, 2014, Dearborn Retail and other related entities entered
into a commitment letter with Bighorn Capital, Inc., which
provided, inter alia, for the contribution of the Dearborn
Entities' assets to a joint venture under which Garvey Court, LLC,
an entity controlled by Bighorn, would acquire the real property
constituting the Food Court.  In connection with the Bighorn
Transaction, on May 12, 2014, Dearborn Retail filed a motion to
reject eighteen unexpired Food Court leases under which it was the
landlord.

Nine of the eighteen tenants whose leases had been rejected filed
timely proofs of claim which were not resolved or settled within
the prescribed period.  Garvey objected to the Rejection Claims.
The Court held evidentiary hearings over three days to determine
the Rejection Claimants' actual damages resulting from the
rejection of the leases.

Judge Cox allowed the Rejection claimants' proofs of claim, finding
that Garvey Court, LLC, and Garvey Court Holdings, LLC, are liable
to each Rejection Claimant for rejection damages in the form of the
following: (1) any amounts needed to build out a new location; (2)
a prorated amount of the build-out costs incurred at the Food Court
for the remaining term of the Rejected Lease; (3) any removal and
relocation of equipment and assets to a new location; (4)
reasonable marketing and advertising at a new location; (5)
replacement rent differential for the remaining term of the
Rejected Lease; and (6) any proven lost profits.  Any unreturned
security deposits will be applied to any unpaid rent during the
months in which the Rejection Claimants remained at the Food Court;
any remainder will be returned, Judge Cox said.  There will be no
amount allowed for "downtime", "ramp-up", "time expended" or
retraining claimed by the Rejection Claimants.  Finally, no claim
for attorneys' fees will be allowed.

The case is In re: Lake Dearborn, LLC, et al., Chapter 11, Debtors,
Case No.: 13-36813, (Bankr. N.D. Ill.).

A full-text copy of Judge Cox's Memorandum Decision dated July 14,
2015, is available at http://is.gd/zcIYSJfrom Leagle.com.


LIFE PARTNERS: Ad Hoc Committee Supports Bid to End Exclusivity
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Ad Hoc Committee of Direct Fractional Interest Owners of Life
Settlement Policies, a party in interest in the bankruptcy cases of
Life Partners Holdings Inc. et al., said it supports the motion to
terminate exclusivity period of Debtors Life Partners, Inc., and
LPI Financial Services, Inc.  filed by John Gissas, Dean Vagnozzi
and Frank Bice.

According to the Ad Hoc Committee, the Debtors' case should be
resolved through confirmation of a chapter 11 plan —- the sooner,
the better.  LPI has limited funds.  Fractional interest owners are
confused.  They have repeatedly called attorneys for the Ad Hoc
Committee for information in this case.  Members of the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors are inundated with calls, letters
and other requests for information.

The Ad Hoc Committee said some fractional interest owners are
obtaining advice from emails and internet message boards because
the cryptic and ambiguous statements on the lphitrustee.com website
do not provide the fractional interest owners with the necessary
information.  The fractional interest owners, many of whom invested
retirement funds, need to know what their rights are in their
investments and need a choice to determine their futures.  The
Bankruptcy Code section 1121 provides chapter 11 debtors an
exclusive period in which to file and confirm a plan. No exclusive
period exists for LPHI.  It is arguable as to whether an exclusive
period exists for LPI or LPIFS, as the sole director of each is the
trustee of LPHI, and he has been running LPI and LPIFS for 120 days
the exclusive time period to file a plan under section 1121(d) of
the Bankruptcy Code.  To the extent LPI or LPIFS does have an
exclusive period under which to file and confirm a chapter 11 plan,
it should be terminated to allow other interested parties to file
plans and seek confirmation of same.

H. Thomas Moran II, the trustee of LPHI and sole director of LPI
and LPIFS, does not appear to have a confirmable plan.  Mr. Moran
himself stated in testimony at a hearing on June 25 that he was not
opposed to terminating the exclusivity period, the Ad hoc Commitee
pointed out.  Mr. Moran has not provided transparency to this
bankruptcy case, the Ad Hoc Committee added.

The Stallings Family Limited Partnership, owns fractional interests
in various individual insurance policies, also supports and
requests termination of the exclusivity period provided under
Section 1121 (allowing any party to file and seek confirmation of a
plan).

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on July 10, 2015,
Messrs. Gissas, Vagnozzi and Bice wanted the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Texas to terminate the exclusivity
period of Debtors so that they or any other party can propose a
plan of reorganization.

Sheldon L. Solow, Esq., at Kaye Scholer LLP, in Chicago, Illinois,
related that the Chapter 11 Trustee filed petitions for LPI and
LPIFS and that while no order has been entered appointing a Chapter
11 Trustee for LPI and LPIFS, the Chapter 11 Trustee is effectively
administering the Subsidiary Debtor cases as if he had been
appointed the chapter 11 trustee of the Subsidiary Debtors through
his status as Trustee of LPHI -- the sole shareholder of the
Subsidiary Debtors.  Mr. Solow asserts that the Subsidiary Debtors
are no longer in possession as the cases are being administered by
a single Trustee.  Mr. Solow further asserts that the purpose of
the exclusivity period -- to give a debtor in possession a limited
first chance to reorganize its business -- does not apply.

The Creditors wish to file a plan of reorganization in the near
future and they are informed and believe that other non-debtors are
also considering filing plans.

                       About Life Partners

Headquartered in Waco, Texas, Life Partners Holdings, Inc. --
http://www.lphi.com/-- is the parent company engaged in the    
secondary market for life insurance, commonly called "life
settlements."  Since its incorporation in 1991, Life Partners,
Inc., has completed over 162,000 transactions for its worldwide
client base of over 30,000 high net worth individuals and
institutions in connection with the purchase of over 6,500 policies
totaling over $3.2 billion in face value.

LPHI is a publicly traded company incorporated in Texas and its
common stock has been delisted from the NASDAQ (formerly trading
under the symbol LPHI).

Life Partners Holdings sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 15-40289) on Jan. 20,
2015.

The case is assigned to Judge Russell F. Nelms.  J. Robert Forshey,
Esq., at Forshey & Prostok, LLP, serves as counsel to the Debtor.

LPHI disclosed $2,406,137 in assets and $52,722,308 in liabilities
as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
tapped Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., as counsel.

Tracy A. Bolt of BDO USA, LLP, was named as examiner for the
Debtor's case.  At the behest of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, the U.S. Trustee, and the Creditors Committee, the
Court ordered the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee.  On March
13, 2015, H. Thomas Moran II was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee in
LPHI's case.  The trustee is represented by Thompson & Knight LLP.

The Chapter 11 trustee signed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions for
LPHI's subsidiaries on May 19, 2015: Life Partners Inc. (Case No.
15-41995) and LPI Financial Services, Inc. (Case No. 15-41996).
Life Partners is estimated to have $100 million to $500 million in
assets and more than $1 billion in debt.  LPI Financial estimated
less than $50,000.


LONESTAR GEOPHYSICAL: Bank Seeks to Pursue Suit Against Manager
---------------------------------------------------------------
Frontier State Bank asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Oklahoma to lift the automatic stay imposed in the
Chapter 11 case of Lonestar Geophysical Surveys, LLC, to allow it
to pursue a state court action.

The Bank has pending a state court action against, among others,
the Debtor's de facto manager, Heath Harris, a non-debtor.  Under
Oklahoma law, his obligations to the Bank are wholly separate and
apart from Lonestar Geophysical Surveys' obligations to the Bank.

John E. Gatliff II, Esq., at C. Craig Cole & Associates, in
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, states that the Bank reasonably believes
that the recent collapse in oil prices and continuing lay-offs in
the oil production and exploration industries will dramatically
reduce the demand for Lonestar Geophysical Surveys' business
services, which the Bank believes puts the Bank at increasing risk,
and which necessitates litigation of the State Court Action against
Heath Harris.

Mr. Gatliff adds that alternatively, should the Court determine
that the automatic stay extends to the cover the Debtor's de facto
manager, Heath Harris, the Bank contends that relief from the
automatic stay as to Heath Harris is in order.  The Bank's cause of
action against Heath Harris is to recover on a separate guaranty
contract to which the Lonestar Geophysical Surveys, LLC is not a
party.  Lonestar Geophysical Surveys has no extraordinary "identity
of interest" that would justify extending the automatic stay to
Heath Harris.  Accordingly, the Bank should be granted relief from
the automatic stay to pursue its 8 claim against Heath Harris in
the State Court Action.

The Debtor, in response, states that it has not asserted and does
not contend that the automatic stay stays the state court action
referenced in Frontier's Motion with respect to anyone other than
Lonestar.

LoneStar Geophysical Surveys L.L.C is represented by:

          Ross Plourde, Esq.
          Steven W. Bugg, Esq.
          MCAFEE & TAFT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
          10th Floor, Two Leadership Square
          211 North Robinson
          Oklahoma City, OK 73102-7103
          Telephone:405/235-9621
          Facsimile:405/235-0439
          Email: ross.plourde@mcafeetaft.com
                 steven.bugg@mcafeetaft.com

The Frontier Stare Bank is represented by:

         C. Craig Cole, OBA No.1775
         John E. Gatliff II, OBA No. 18060
         C. CRAIG COLE & ASSOCIATES
         317 N.W. 12th Street
         Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103
         Telephone: (405) 232-8700
         Facsimile (405) 232-1655

                 About Lonestar Geophysical

Lonestar Geophysical Surveys, LLC, which acquires seismic data and
provides services and products to the oil and gas industry, sought
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. Okla. Case No. 15-11872) on
May 18, 2015.

Judge Hon. Sarah A. Hall presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped
Ross A. Plourde, Esq., at McAfee & Taft, as counsel.

According to the docket, the Debtor's Chapter 11 plan and
disclosure statement are due Sept. 15, 2015.  Governmental proofs
of claim are due Nov. 16, 2015.


LONESTAR INTERMEDIATE: S&P Affirms 'B' CCR; Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said that it affirmed its 'B'
long-term corporate credit ratings on Lonestar Intermediate Super
Holdings LLC (Lonestar; a wholly owned subsidiary of NEWAsurion
Corp.) and Asurion LLC.  The outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B' senior secured debt rating
and '3' recovery rating on Asurion LLC's existing senior secured
facilities, consisting of a $4.038 billion B-1 term loan, a $835
million B-2 term loan, and a $190 million revolver (with the
transaction, the company amended revolver capacity on its revolver
to $190 million from $100 million and extended maturity to 2019
from 2018).  S&P also affirmed its 'CCC+' senior unsecured debt
rating and '6' recovery rating on the company's unsecured
facilities, which consist of a $1.7 billion second-lien term loan.
Under the proposed refinancing, the company is also adding an
incremental $450 million add-on to its existing second-lien term
loan.

S&P also assigned its 'B' senior secured debt and '3' recovery
rating to the company's proposed new $700 million B-3 term loan due
July 2022.  NEWAsurion will use the proceeds from the $1.15 billion
in new debt and $550 million in balance-sheet cash to fund a
minority equity buyout, retire its $250 million non-amortizing term
loan due 2017, and for general corporate purposes.

"The affirmation reflects our belief that, although the proposed
new debt issuance results in modestly weaker credit-protection
measures, leverage and coverage remain within our expectations for
the current rating.  Furthermore, we believe the company's
sustained competitive position and cash-flow generating
capabilities will enable it to carry this increased debt," said
Standard & Poor's credit analyst Julie Herman.

"The stable outlook on NEWAsurion Corp. reflects our expectation
that the company will continue to generate solid cash flow and be
able to service its debt adequately.  We believe the company
benefits from its solid competitive position in the handset
protection and extended service warranty market, strong attachment
rates, and successful international expansion that have led to
healthy and predictable revenue streams.  We believe these factors
will enable the company to sustain favorable operating performance.
We expect projected cash flows to support the rating and allow
NEWAsurion to maintain adequate debt servicing for the current
rating, including financial leverage of 6x-6.5x for year-end 2015
and coverage of more than 2x.  The outlook also incorporates our
belief that the company's credit metrics could be pressured by its
financial management strategy, which we consider to be a rating
constraint," S&P said.

S&P could lower the ratings during the next 12 months if NEWAsurion
were to adopt a more aggressive financial policy via a substantial
dividend recapitalization or large debt-funded acquisition
resulting in a debt-to-EBITDA ratio of more than 8x or EBITDA
coverage of less than 2x.  S&P would also consider lowering the
ratings if NEWAsurion's business profile were to deteriorate from
the loss of one or two of its top clients.

It is unlikely that S&P would raise the ratings during the next 12
months because of financial profile constraints.  While also
unlikely, if S&P believes the debt-to-EBITDA ratio will be
consistently less than 6x and EBITDA interest coverage consistently
more than 3x, S&P could raise the ratings by one notch.



LOS GATOS HOTEL: Wins Extension of Cash Use Until Dec. 31
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Arthur S. Weissbrodt of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division,
approved the Eighth Stipulation between Los Gatos Hotel Corporation
and GCCFC 2006-GG7 Los Gatos Lodging Limited Partnership extending
the terms of cash collateral provisions.

Pursuant to the stipulation, the Debtor is authorized to use
Secured Creditor's cash collateral through and including the
earlier of (a) the date of confirmation of any plan of
reorganization containing terms acceptable to Secured Creditor in
its sole discretion, (b) the date of consummation of a sale of
substantially all of the Debtor's assets, or (c) December 31, 2015,
or until the authorization is terminated.

Los Gatos Hotel Corporation is represented by:

          Jeffry A. Davis, Esq.
          Abigail V. O'Brient, Esq.
          Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo P.C.
          3580 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300
          San Diego, California 92130
          Tel.: 858 314-1500
          Fax: 858 314-1501
          Email: jadavis@mintz.com
                 avobrient@mintz.com

                     About Los Gatos Hotel

San Jose, California-based Los Gatos Hotel Corporation, dba Hotel
Los Gatos, was formed in 2000 to build and operate Hotel Los Gatos,
a full-service boutique hotel in downtown Los Gatos, California.

Los Gatos Hotel filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on
December 27, 2010 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 10-63135).  The Debtor
disclosed $17,191,277 in assets and $12,896,468 in liabilities as
of the Chapter 11 filing.  Affiliate Blossom Valley Investors,
Inc., filed a separate Chapter 11 petition on September 10, 2009
(Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 09-57669).

Jeffry A. Davis, Esq., at Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky Popeo,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor has tapped
OSAS Inc. as financial advisor and investment banker.


MAGNETATION LLC: Proposes Up to $1.9MM in Bonuses to 120 Workers
----------------------------------------------------------------
Magnetation LLC and its debtor subsidiaries sought and obtained
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Minnesota to implement the 2015 incentive program.

Pursuant to a Management Services Agreement, Mag LLC contracts for
the employment of approximately 125 employees from Mag Inc.  These
employees provide management, supervisory, human resources,
finance, engineering, administrative and clerical services to Mag
LLC.  Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, Mag LLC is
required to reimburse Mag Inc. for the compensation and benefits,
operating costs incurred by Mag Inc. on behalf of Mag LLC and Mag
Inc.'s overhead costs attributable to the employees.

Historically, and in the ordinary course of business, the Debtors
have reimbursed Mag Inc. under the Management Services Agreement
for annual incentive payments made by Mag Inc. to the employees
that Mag Inc. provides to the Debtors pursuant to an annual
incentive compensation program approved by Mag LLC's board of
directors.

There are approximately 120 eligible employees included in the 2015
Incentive Program.  The 2015 Incentive Program contemplates
Incentive Payments in an aggregate estimated amount of $1 to $1.9
million, with an aggregate cap of $2.4 million and an average
estimated individual payment of between $8,000 and $16,000 per
employee.

Although the Incentive Payments would not be made until December
2015 -- potentially after the Debtors have emerged from Chapter 11
-- without assurances that the Incentive Payments will be
forthcoming to bring the Eligible Employees' compensation in line
with the industry, the Debtors risk the loss of the most valuable
component of their businesses and a key element in their successful
reorganization, Marshall S. Huebner, Esq., at Davis Polk & Wardwell
LLP, in New York, tells the Court.

The Debtors are represented by:

          Marshall S. Huebner, Esq.
          Michelle M. McGreal, Esq.
          DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP  
          450 Lexington Avenue
          New York, New York 10017
          Telephone: (212) 450-4000
          Facsimile: (212) 701-5800
          Email: marshall.huebner@davispolk.com
                 michelle.mcgreal@davispolk.com

             -- and --

          Ralph V. Mitchell, Esq.
          Mark J. Kalla, Esq.
          LAPP, LIBRA, THOMSON,
             STOEBNER & PUSCH, CHARTERED
          120 South Sixth Street,Suite 2500
          Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
          Telephone: (612) 338-5815
          Facsimile: (612) 338-6651
          Email: RMitchell@lapplibra.com
          Email: MKalla@lapplibra.com

                     About Magnetation LLC

Magnetation LLC -- http://www.magnetation.com/-- is a joint    
venture between Magnetation, Inc. (50.1% owner) and AK Iron
Resources, LLC, an affiliate of AK Steel Corporation (49.9%
owner).  Magnetation LLC recovers high-quality iron ore concentrate
from previously abandoned iron ore waste stockpiles and tailings
basins.  Magnetation LLC owns iron ore concentrate plants located
in Keewatin, MN, Bovey, MN and Grand Rapids, MN, and an iron ore
pellet plant in Reynolds, IN.  

Magnetation LLC and four subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Minn. Lead Case No. 15-50307) in Duluth,
Minnesota, on May 5, 2015, after reaching a deal with secured
noteholders on a balance sheet restructuring.  The cases are
assigned to Chief Judge Gregory F Kishel.

The Debtors have tapped Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Lapp, Libra,
Thomson, Stoebner & Pusch, Chtd., as attorneys; Blackstone Advisory
Partners LP as financial advisor; and Donlin, Recano & Company,
Inc., as the claims agent.

The Debtor's exclusive period for filing a plan and disclosure
statement ends Sept. 2, 2015.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 12 appointed three creditors of
Magnetation LLC to serve on an official committee of unsecured
creditors.  The Creditors' Committee retains Cooley LLP as lead
counsel and Foley & Mansfield, PLLP, as local counsel.


MAMMOTH RESOURCES: Trustee's Bid to Dismiss Cory Appeal Granted
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Greg N. Stivers of the United States District Court for the
Western District of Kentucky, Bowling Green Division, granted the
motion to dismiss Dr. Roger L. Cory's appeal from an order
approving a settlement entered into between Robert W. Leasure,
Chapter 11 trustee for Mammoth Resource Partners, Inc., et al., and
various parties.

On May 15, 2012, the Chapter 11 Trustee initiated an adversary
proceeding asserting various claims against Cory, a shareholder of
the Debtors.  On May 31, 2013, a Settlement Agreement was entered
into by various parties -- including the Debtors and Cory --
resolving all claims relating to the adversary proceedings
initiated against Cory and others.  Under the Settlement Agreement,
Cory voluntarily relinquished certain property rights and interests
in exchange for the Trustee's release of all further claims against
Cory.  The Settlement Agreement was approved on June 25, 2013.

On November 26, 2014, Cory filed an appeal to set aside the Order
of the Bankruptcy Court and void the settlement release agreement.
He claimed that he was induced to grant the release by fraud,
and/or undue influence.

Judge Stivers concluded that Cory has failed to identify any legal
basis to invalidate the Settlement Agreement.  The judge found that
Cory's allegations of fraud against the Trustee pertained to events
that occurred prior to and which were unrelated to the execution of
the Settlement Agreement.  The judge also found that the purported
undue influence and duress related to Cory's financial difficulties
at the time he executed the Settlement Agreement which could not be
considered proof of any undue influence or duress.

The case is DR. ROGER L. CORY, Appellant, v. ROBERT W. LEASURE,
CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE, Appellee, CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00001-GNS (W.D.
Ky.).

A full-text copy of Judge Stivers' July 15, 2015 memorandum opinion
and order is available at http://is.gd/RbM5vvfrom Leagle.com.


Robert W. Leasure is represented by:

          Daniel T. Albers, Jr., Esq.
          Mark A. Robinson, Esq.
          Robert T. Wagner, Esq.
          VALENTI, HANLEY & ROBINSON, PLLC
          401 West Main Street, Suite 1950
          Louisville, KY 40202
          Tel: (502) 568-2100
          Fax: (502) 568-2101

Mammoth Resource Partners, Inc. is represented by:

          Charity B. Neukomm, Esq.
          SEILLER WATERMAN, LLC
          462 S. Fourth Street, 22nd Floor
          Louisville, KY 40202
          Tel: (502) 584-7400
          Fax: (502) 583-2100
          Email: neukomm@derbycitylaw.com

             -- and –

          Kenneth A. Meredith, II
          LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH A. MEREDITH II
          316 East ain St.
          Bowling Green, KY 42102
          Tel: (270) 781-6194
               (270) 991-4007
          Fax: (270) 783-0681

Cave City, Kentucky-based Mammoth Resource Partners, Inc., filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 10-11377) on
Sept. 8, 2010.  Judge Joan A. Lloyd presides over the case.  David
M. Cantor, Esq., at Seiller Waterman LLC, serves as the Debtor's
counsel.  In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and $100,001 to $500,000 in debts.  A list of the
Company's 20 largest unsecured creditors filed together with the
petition is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/kywb10-11377.pdf The petition was signed
by Roger L. Cory, CEO.


MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT: Entire CNOL Considered as NOL for Reduction
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Tax Court ruled in favor of the Commissioner of
the Internal Revenue, after being made to decide, as a matter of
law, whether a consolidated group's net operating loss subject to
reduction under section 108(b)(2)(A) for its short taxable year
ending October 1, 1998, is (1) the entire consolidated net
operating loss of the consolidated group or (2) a portion of the
CNOL allocable to each member of the consolidated group.

Petitioner Marvel Entertainment, LLC, et al., argue that the NOL
subject to reduction under Section 108(b)(2)(A) is limited to the
share of a consolidated group's CNOL allocable to each member
entity.

Judge Ruwe, finding that neither the Internal Revenue Code nor the
applicable consolidated return regulations provide authority for an
affiliated group to allocate and apportion CNOL to consolidated
group members for purposes of reducing tax attributes pursuant to
section 108(b)(2)(A), held that for the relevant consolidated
return years in issue, the consolidated return regulations required
that a consolidated group's entire CNOL be treated as the NOL
subject to reduction.

The case is MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR TO MARVEL
ENTERTAINMENT, INC., f.k.a. MARVEL ENTERPRISES, INC. AND AS AGENT
FOR MEMBERS OF MARVEL ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES GROUP,
Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, Docket
No. 12113-13.

A full-text copy of Judge Ruwe's Opinion, dated July 21, 2015, is
available at http://is.gd/rTdSsbfrom Leagle.com.

Marvel Entertainment, LLC is represented by:

          Mark J. Silverman, Esq.
          Andrew F. Gordon, Esq.
          STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
          1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
          Washington, D.C. 20036
          Telephone: (202)429-6450
          Facsimile: (202)429-3902
          Email: msliverman@steptoe.com
                 agordon@steptoe.com
      
          - and -
    
          Matthew D. Lerner, Esq.
          SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
          1501 K Street, N.W.
          Washington, D.C. 20005
          Telephone: (202)736-8983
          Email: mlerner@sidley.com
        
      
Commissioner of Internal Revenue is represented by:
   
          Curt M. Rubin, Esq.
          Steven N. Balahtsis, Esq.
          33 Maiden Lane, 12th Floor
          New York, N.Y. 10038
          Telephone: (971)421-4655
          Facsimile: (917)421-4821

                   About Marvel Entertainment

With a library of over 5,000 characters built over more than 60
years of comic book publishing, Marvel Entertainment, Inc. --
http://www.marvel.com/-- is one of the world's most prominent  
character-based entertainment companies.  Marvel utilizes its
character franchises in licensing, entertainment (via Marvel
Studios) and publishing (via Marvel Comics), with emphasis on
feature films, home DVD, consumer products, video games, action
figures and role-playing toys, television and promotions.
Marvel's strategy is to leverage its franchises in a growing array
of opportunities around the world.

Marvel filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on Dec. 27, 1996 (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 96-_____), to implement a proposed $525 million
recapitalization.  Marvel's filing did not include Marvel's Panini
subsidiary, which is headquartered in Italy.  In conjunction with
the chapter 11 filing, a bank group led by Chase Manhattan Bank
agreed to provide Marvel with $100 million of debtor-in-
possession financing.

Marvel's plan of reorganization was consummated on Oct. 18, 1998.
The plan was confirmed on July 31, 1998.  Pursuant to the plan,
MEG Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of the company, merged with and into Marvel, with
Marvel continuing as the surviving corporation and as a wholly
owned subsidiary of the registrant.  As a result of the merger,
the company acquired all of the tangible and intangible assets of
Marvel.

Marvel was acquired by Walt Disney Co. in 2009 for $4 billion.


MCCLATCHY CO: Reports Preliminary Second Quarter 2015 Results
-------------------------------------------------------------
The McClatchy Company reported preliminary earnings from continuing
operations in the second quarter of 2015 of $0.1 million, or $0.00
per share.  Preliminary earnings do not include an anticipated
non-cash charge to GAAP earnings for impairment of goodwill and
long-lived assets.

In connection with the company's management reorganization actions
and the recent decline in its stock price, management noted that it
is in the process of performing impairment testing of goodwill and
other long-lived assets as of June 28, 2015.  Upon completion of
that testing, the company expects to record a non-cash impairment
charge to GAAP earnings in its second quarter financial statements
when it files its Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on or before Aug. 7, 2015.  The company will issue
a press release announcing the final second quarter results when it
files its Form 10-Q with the SEC.

The Company reported net income of $98,000 on $262.3 million of
revenues for the quarter ended June 28, 2015, compared to net
income of $89.9 million on $287.4 million of revenues for the
quarter ended June 29, 2015.

For the six months ended June 28, 2015, the Company recorded a net
loss of $11.2 million on $519.5 million of revenues compared to net
income of $74.1 million on $563.5 million of revenues for the
quarter ended June 29, 2014.

Pat Talamantes, McClatchy's president and CEO, said, "We made
significant progress in the second quarter executing on our
strategic initiatives even in the face of another challenging
quarter, particularly in print-related advertising revenue.  As we
outlined during our first quarter earnings call in April of this
year, we are working on various revenue-generating and
expense-savings initiatives.  We are focused on building the
leading local media companies in each of our markets as we expand
and grow our non-traditional revenue sources while at the same time
reducing legacy costs.  We are on track to achieve the $25 million
to $30 million of cost savings in 2015 that we targeted at the
onset from these specific initiatives.  We expect the savings to
continue to build over the course of the year and, in light of
continued weakness in print advertising revenues, individual
newspapers continue to adopt additional cost reduction plans to
achieve their budgets."

Talamantes continued, "In addition to the gains we made on the
operational front, we were also able to reduce our outstanding debt
balance by $41.3 million and still end the quarter with $32.1
million in cash.  We saw an improvement in free cash flow
generation as cash interest continues to decline.  And under our
newly established share repurchase program, we repurchased 565,000
shares of Class A stock during the quarter."

A copy of the press release is available at http://is.gd/S5Y15b

                   About The McClatchy Company

Sacramento, Cal.-based The McClatchy Company (NYSE: MNI)
-- http://www.mcclatchy.com/-- is a media company that provides
both print and digital news and advertising services.  Its
operations include 30 daily newspapers, community newspapers,
websites, mobile news and advertising, niche publications, direct
marketing and direct mail services.  Its owned newspapers include,
among others, the (Fort Worth) Star-Telegram, The Sacramento Bee,
The Kansas City Star, the Miami Herald, The Charlotte Observer, and
The (Raleigh) News & Observer.  The Company holds interest in
digital assets which include CareerBuilder, LLC, Classified
Ventures, LLC, HomeFinder, LLC, and Wanderful Media.

McClatchy Co reported net income of $374 million on $1.14 billion
of net revenues for the year ended Dec. 28, 2014, compared with net
income of $18.8 million on $1.21 billion of net revenues for the
year ended Dec. 29, 2013.

As of March 29, 2015, the Company had $2.35 billion in total
assets, $1.85 billion in total liabilities, and $496 million in
stockholders' equity.

                           *     *     *

McClatchy carries a 'Caa1' corporate family rating from Moody's
Investors Service.  In May 2011, Moody's changed the rating
outlook from stable to positive following the company's
announcement that it closed on the sale of land in Miami for
$236 million.  The outlook change reflects Moody's expectation
that McClatchy will utilize the net proceeds to reduce debt,
including its underfunded pension position, which will reduce
leverage by approximately half a turn and lower required
contributions to the pension plan over the next few years.

As reported by the TCR on April 2, 2014, Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services affirmed all ratings on U.S. newspaper company The
McClatchy Co., including the 'B-' corporate credit rating, and
revised the rating outlook to stable from positive.  The outlook
revision to stable reflects S&P's expectation that the
timeframe for a potential upgrade lies beyond the next 12 months,
and could also depend on the company realizing value from its
digital minority interests.


MCS GROUP: Moody's Affirms 'B3' Corporate Family Rating
-------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed MCS Group Holdings LLC's
(formerly known as MCS AMS Sub-Group Holdings, LLC, "MCS") ratings.
The Corporate Family rating ("CFR") was affirmed at B3, the
Probability of Default rating ("PDR") was affirmed at Caa1-PD and
the senior secured was affirmed at B3 (LGD3). The rating outlook
was revised to stable from negative.

MCS and its lenders have agreed to an amendment to the senior
secured credit facilities. The amendment relaxes financial
covenants, among other things.

Issuer: MCS Group Holdings LLC

Actions:

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3
Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Caa1-PD
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B3 (LGD3)

Outlook:

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

MCS's B3 CFR reflects debt to EBITDA Moody's expects will remain
around 5 times, limited free cash flow and high customer
concentration. MCS has narrowed its business focus by exiting the
post-foreclosure property management business following the loss of
its largest REO customer in 2014, but by doing so Moody's expects
MCS should be able to grow revenues 2% to 4% in 2015 and 2016 by
emphasizing services in the market for property management services
to banks and servicers with non-performing and pre-foreclosure
residential mortgages. The recent amendment affords the company
additional time to produce improvements in its financial results.
Liquidity is considered adequate, although Moody's notes that $25.5
million per year of required term loan amortization and financial
covenant requirements that tighten over time could cause pressure
if operating results fall below expectations.

The stable ratings outlook reflects MCS's improved financial
flexibility as a result of the recent amendment and ongoing sponsor
support, as well as Moody's anticipation of about $30 million of
free cash flow and adequate liquidity. Moody's expects MCS may seek
to boost revenue growth through acquisitions. The ratings could be
upgraded if MCS demonstrates sustained revenue growth, substantial
improvement in credit metrics and improved liquidity. The ratings
could be lowered if revenues decline or liquidity deteriorates.

MCS, controlled by affiliates of financial sponsor TDR Capital,
provides property inspection and preservation services on behalf of
lenders and loan servicers for homes with defaulted mortgage loans.
Moody's expects 2015 revenues of about $350 million.


MILAGRO HOLDINGS: July 30 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on July 30, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of Milagro Holdings, LLC, et al.

The meeting will be held at:

         J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
         844 King St., Room 2112
         Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee. Section 1103 of the
Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may consult with the
debtor, investigate the debtor and its business operations and
participate in the formulation of a plan of reorganization.  The
Committee may also perform other services as are in the interests
of the unsecured creditors whom it represents.


MINERAL PARK: Seeks Approval of $500K Settlement with Trafigura
---------------------------------------------------------------
Mineral Park, Inc. and its affiliated debtors ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to approve a
settlement with Trafigura Trading LLC, f/k/a Trafigura AG and
Societe Generale, as administrative agent.

The material provisions of the Settlement Agreement are as
follows:

   (1) Trafigura will pay to the Debtors' "Proceeds Account" the
following amounts: (a) $500,000; (b) an amount equal to 20% of any
amount over $5,000,000 that Trafigura receives from the Cash
Proceeds; and (b) so long as Trafigura receives at least $1,000,000
from the Cash Proceeds, an amount equal to the sum of (x) $150,000
and (y) 10% of any amount that Trafigura receives from the Cash
Proceeds;

   (2) The Agent may apply the Settlement Payments in reduction of
the MPI Obligations;

   (3)  The Debtors will dismiss the Adversary Proceeding with
prejudice;

   (4) The Surcharge Motion will be deemed amended to withdraw the
request that any assets of Bluefish be surcharged;

   (5) The Debtors will withdraw the Motion to Approve Stipulation
and the Additional Cash Stipulation;

   (6) The Debtors will turn over the Additional Cash Proceeds to
the Agent, and the Agent will apply the Additional Cash Proceeds in
reduction of the MPI Obligations;

   (7) Trafigura will release (i) all interest in the Reclamation
Cash, the Reclamation Cash Proceeds and any other Cash Collateral
and (ii) all claims against the Agent or the Lenders in relation to
the Additional Cash Proceeds and any other Cash Collateral;

   (8) Discovery between Trafigura and the Agent will be deemed
complete and neither Trafigura nor the agent will call the other as
a witness at the Trial; and

   (9) The Debtors and Trafigura will exchange mutual releases with
respect to the Off-Take Contract, the Receivable and the Adversary
Proceeding.

James E. O'Neill, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP in
Wilmington, Delaware, tells the Court that the Settlement Agreement
benefits creditors -- specifically, the Agent and the Lenders -- by
giving the Debtors access to $500,000 in immediately available
funds and future payments that may reach $2,650,000 in order to pay
down Mineral Park's obligations under the Credit Agreement it
executed with the Lenders to finance its mining operations at
Mineral Park Mine.  Mr. O'Neill further tells the Court that the
Settlement Agreement will also enable the Debtors to turn over the
Additional Cash Proceeds to the Agent free and clear of Trafigura's
asserted claims.

Mohave County, Arizona, objected to the Debtors' Motion., arguing
that the Settlement Motion should not be granted, nor the
Settlement Agreement approved, because it prematurely seeks to
resolve contested matters pending before the Court to the detriment
of non-parties, including Mohave County.  Mohave County also
complains that the Debtors have not demonstrated that the
Settlement Agreement is in the best interest of the Debtors'
estates.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed a limited
objection, complaining that the Debtors have not provided an
estimate of the fees and expenses they expect to accrue in
connection with the Adversary Proceeding and the motion does not
expressly identify a mechanism by which other parties with an
interest in the estate's limited funds will have an opportunity to
review and object to such fees and costs.  The Committee,
accordingly, asks that any order granting the motion expressly
state that any payment of fees and expenses out of the Settlement
Payments and Additional Cash Proceeds held by the Agent remains
subject to all fee application procedures approved in the cases.
The Committee said that under the proposed settlement, the Agent's
right to retain the Settlement Payments and Additional Cash
Proceeds is made subject not only to the Carve-Out, but also to the
Debtors' "reasonable professional fees and expenses in connection
with the Adversary Proceeding."  The Committee asserted that the
motion does not make clear how the rights of estate professionals
other than Debtors' counsel might be impacted by this new
arrangement.

Mineral Park, Inc. and Bluefish Energy Corporation are represented
by:

          Jeremy V. Richards, Esq.
          Maxim B. Litvak, Esq.
          James E. O'Neill, Esq.
          PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
          919 North Market Street, 17th Floor
          P.O. Box 8705
          Wilmington, DE 19899-8705
          Telephone: (302)652-4100
          Facsimile: (302)652-4400
          Email: jrichards@pszjlaw.com
                 mlitvak@pszjlaw.com
                 joneill@pszjlaw.com

             -- and --

          Edward O. Sassower, Esq.
          Stephen E. Hessler, Esq.
          Brian E. Schartz, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          601 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10022-4611
          Telephone: (212)446-4800
          Facsimile: (212)446-4900
          Email: edward.sassower@kirkland.com
                 stephen.hessler@kirkland.com
                 brian.schartz@kirkland.com

             -- and --

          James H.M. Sprayregen, Esq.
          Marc Kieselstein, Esq.
          Chad J. Husnick, Esq.
          Steven N. Serajeddini, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          300 North LaSalle
          Chicago, Illinois 60654
          Telephone: (312)862-2000
          Facsimile: (312)862-2200
          Email: james.sprayregen@kirkland.com
                 marc.kieselstein@kirkland.com
                 chad.husnick@kirkland.com
                 steven.serajeddini@kirkland.com

Mohave County, Arizona is represented by:

          Christopher M. Winter, Esq.
          Jarret P. Hitchings, Esq.
          DUANE MORRIS LLP
          222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1600
          Wilmington, DE 19801-1246
          Telephone: (302)657-4900
          Facsimile: (302)657-4901
          Email: cmwinter@duanemorris.com
                 jphitchings@duanemorris.com

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by:

          Adam Hiller, Esq.
          Brian Arban, Esq.
          Johnna M. Darby, Esq.
          HILLER & ARBAN LLC
          1500 N. French Street, 2nd Floor
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302)442-7676
          Facsimile: (302)442-7045
          Email: ahiller@hillerarban.com
                 barban@hillerarban.com
                 jdarby@hillerarban.com

             -- and --

          Robert T. Kugler, Esq.
          Edwin H. Caldie, Esq.
          STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP
          150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300
          Minneapolis, MN 55402
          Telephone: (612)335-1404
          Facsimile: (612)335-1657
          Email: robert.kugler@stinsonleonard.com
                 ed.caldie@stinsonleonard.com

                        About Mineral Park

Mineral Park, Inc., Bluefish Energy Corp. and two affiliates
commenced proceedings under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in
Delaware on Aug. 25, 2014.  The cases are pending before the
Honorable Kevin J. Carey and are jointly administered under Case
No. 14-11996.

Mineral Park and its affiliated debtors are subsidiaries of
Mercator Minerals Ltd. ("MML"), a mineral resource company engaged
through various subsidiaries in the mining, exploration,
development and operation of its mineral properties in Mohave
County, Arizona, and Sonora, Mexico.

Mineral Park's principal asset is the Mineral Park Mine, a
producing copper-molybdenum mine located near Kingman, Arizona.
Bluefish is the owner and operator of the industrial gas turbine
power generator at the Mine.

British Columbia, Canada-based MML, which has shares trading on the
Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading symbol "ML", is not
included in the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors have tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as
counsel, Evercore Group LLC as investment banker, FTI Consulting,
Inc., as financial advisor, FTI's David J. Beckman as CRO, and
FTI's Paul Hansen as assistant CRO.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims
and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed three creditors of Mineral
Park, Inc. and its affiliates to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors.  The Committee selected Stinson Leonard Street
LLP and Hiller & Arban LLC as its counsel.

Mineral Park reported $286 million in total assets and $266 million
in total liabilities.


MINERAL TECHNOLOGY: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Mineral Technology Corporation
           aka MinTec
        4990 N. Elk Vale Road
        Rapid City, SD 57701
        Email: sdsenstan@gmail.com

Case No.: 15-50164

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 23, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of South Dakota (Western (Rapid City))

Judge: Hon. Charles L. Nail, Jr.

Debtor's Counsel: Stanton A. Anker, Esq.
                  ANKER LAW GROUP, P.C.
                  1301 West Omaha Street, Suite 207
                  Rapid City, SD 57701
                  Tel: 605-718-7050
                  Fax: 605-718-0700
                  Email: stanton@ankerlawgroup.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Stanford Adelstein, chairman, Board of
Directors.

A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/sdb15-50164.pdf


MOTORS LIQUIDATION: GUC Trust Sells 10.2M New GM Common Shares
--------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to an order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York, Wilmington Trust Company, solely in its
capacity as trust administrator and trustee of the Motors
Liquidation Company GUC Trust, received authority to:

    (i) convert all of the GUC Trust's holdings of (A) a series of
        warrants each entitling the holder to acquire one share of
        common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of General Motors
        Company with an exercise price of $10.00 per share, (B) a
        series of warrants each entitling the holder to acquire
        one share of New GM Common Stock with an exercise price of
        $18.33 per share; and

   (ii) liquidate all or substantially all of its holdings of New
        GM Common Stock into cash.

Following entry of the Liquidation Order, the GUC Trust converted
(i) 10,352,556 Class "A" Warrants into 7,390,502 shares of New GM
Common Stock utilizing the cashless exercise feature of such
warrants, and (ii) 10,352,556 Class "B" Warrants into 4,923,111
shares of New GM Common Stock utilizing the cashless exercise
feature of those warrants.

As of July 24, 2015, the GUC Trust has completed sales in the
aggregate of 10,200,000 shares of New GM Common Stock at a weighted
average price of $30.8391 per share in the open market for a total
consideration, net of transaction expenses, of $314,196,008 in
cash.  The GUC Trust intends to continue the liquidation of its
remaining holdings of New GM Common Stock in accordance with the
Liquidation Order.

                     About Motors Liquidation

General Motors Corporation and three of its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 09-50026) on
June 1, 2009.  The Honorable Robert E. Gerber presides over the
Chapter 11 cases.  Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Stephen Karotkin,
Esq., and Joseph H. Smolinsky, Esq., at Weil, Gotshal & Manges
LLP, assist the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Al Koch
at AP Services, LLC, an affiliate of AlixPartners, LLP, serves as
the Chief Executive Officer for Motors Liquidation Company.  GM
is also represented by Jenner & Block LLP and Honigman Miller
Schwartz and Cohn LLP as counsel.  Cravath, Swaine, & Moore LLP
is providing legal advice to the GM Board of Directors.  GM's
financial advisors are Morgan Stanley, Evercore Partners and the
Blackstone Group LLP.  Garden City Group is the claims and notice
agent of the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors and a separate Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors Holding Asbestos-Related Claims.  Lawyers at Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP served as bankruptcy counsel to the
Creditors Committee.  Attorneys at Butzel Long served as counsel
on supplier contract matters.  FTI Consulting Inc. served as
financial advisors to the Creditors Committee.  Elihu Inselbuch,
Esq., at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, represented the Asbestos
Committee.  Legal Analysis Systems, Inc., served as asbestos
valuation analyst.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Debtors'
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan on March 29, 2011.  The Plan
was declared effect on March 31.

On Dec. 15, 2011, Motors Liquidation Company was dissolved.  On
the Dissolution Date, pursuant to the Plan and the Motors
Liquidation Company GUC Trust Agreement, dated March 30, 2011,
between the parties thereto, the trust administrator and trustee
-- GUC Trust Administrator -- of the Motors Liquidation Company
GUC Trust, assumed responsibility for the affairs of and certain
claims against MLC and its debtor subsidiaries that were not
concluded prior to the Dissolution Date.

As of March 31, 2015, Motors Liquidation had $1.01 billion in total
assets, $69.23 million in total liabilities and $944.73 million in
net assets in liquidation.


MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Wilmington Files Trust Report as of June 30
---------------------------------------------------------------
Wilmington Trust Company, acting solely in its capacity as trust
administrator and trustee of the Motors Liquidation Company GUC
Trust, filed a GUC Trust Report required by Section 6.2(c) of the
GUC Trust Agreement together with the Budget Variance Report, each
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015.  In addition, the
Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust announced that no distribution
in respect of its Units is anticipated for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2015.

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Motors Liquidation Company GUC
Trust Agreement dated as of June 11, 2012, and between the parties
thereto, as amended, the GUC Trust Administrator is required to
file GUC Trust Reports with the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York.  In addition, pursuant to that certain
Bankruptcy Court Order Authorizing the GUC Trust Administrator to
Liquidate New GM Securities for the Purpose of Funding Fees, Costs
and Expenses of the GUC Trust and the Avoidance Action Trust, dated
March 8, 2012, the GUC Trust Administrator is required to file
certain quarterly variance reports as described in the third
sentence of Section 6.4 of the GUC Trust Agreement with the
Bankruptcy Court.

A copy of the Morots Liquidation Company GUC Trust Quarterly
Section 6.2(C) Report and Budget Variance Report as of June 30,
2015, is available at http://is.gd/i84toY

                     About Motors Liquidation

General Motors Corporation and three of its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 09-50026) on
June 1, 2009.  The Honorable Robert E. Gerber presides over the
Chapter 11 cases.  Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Stephen Karotkin,
Esq., and Joseph H. Smolinsky, Esq., at Weil, Gotshal & Manges
LLP, assist the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Al Koch
at AP Services, LLC, an affiliate of AlixPartners, LLP, serves as
the Chief Executive Officer for Motors Liquidation Company.  GM
is also represented by Jenner & Block LLP and Honigman Miller
Schwartz and Cohn LLP as counsel.  Cravath, Swaine, & Moore LLP
is providing legal advice to the GM Board of Directors.  GM's
financial advisors are Morgan Stanley, Evercore Partners and the
Blackstone Group LLP.  Garden City Group is the claims and notice
agent of the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors and a separate Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors Holding Asbestos-Related Claims.  Lawyers at Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP served as bankruptcy counsel to the
Creditors Committee.  Attorneys at Butzel Long served as counsel
on supplier contract matters.  FTI Consulting Inc. served as
financial advisors to the Creditors Committee.  Elihu Inselbuch,
Esq., at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, represented the Asbestos
Committee.  Legal Analysis Systems, Inc., served as asbestos
valuation analyst.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Debtors'
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan on March 29, 2011.  The Plan
was declared effect on March 31.

On Dec. 15, 2011, Motors Liquidation Company was dissolved.  On
the Dissolution Date, pursuant to the Plan and the Motors
Liquidation Company GUC Trust Agreement, dated March 30, 2011,
between the parties thereto, the trust administrator and trustee
-- GUC Trust Administrator -- of the Motors Liquidation Company
GUC Trust, assumed responsibility for the affairs of and certain
claims against MLC and its debtor subsidiaries that were not
concluded prior to the Dissolution Date.

As of March 31, 2015, Motors Liquidation had $1.01 billion in total
assets, $69.23 million in total liabilities and $944.73 million in
net assets in liquidation.


NAARTJIE CUSTOM: Court Grants Bid to Dismiss Chap. 11 Case
----------------------------------------------------------
Naartjie Custom Kids, Inc., joined by the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditor asked the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Utah to dismiss the Chapter 11 case.  Upon dismissal,
however, the Debtor asks that the orders of the Court remain in
full force and effect and that release and exculpation provisions
be included in the order dismissing the case.  Only the United
States Trustee objected to the Motion to Dismiss, arguing that
there is no statutory authority to grant the relief sought.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge William T. Thurman overruled the U.S.
Trustee's objection and granted the Debtor's motion to dismiss its
Chapter 11 case.  Judge Thurman said he appreciates the attention
that the U.S. Trustee has given this and the other cases in this
District.  The U.S. Trustee's arguments against the structured
dismissal appear to be better suited to those cases where there are
a myriad of loose ends, lack of unanimity of support from
creditors, and a failure to address the needs of creditors, Judge
Thurman held.  In this particular case, the Court is persuaded that
the moving parties have carried their burden of persuasion.

The bankruptcy case is In re AARTJIE CUSTOM KIDS, INC., Chapter 11,
Debtor, Bankruptcy Case No. 14-29666, (D. Utah).

A full-text copy of Judge Thurman's Memorandum Decision dated July
13, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/5GNWktfrom Leagle.com.

                    About Naartjie Custom Kids

Naartjie Custom Kids, Inc., which designs, manufactures and sells
children's clothing, accessories and footwear for ages newborn
through 10 years old, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code on Sept. 12, 2014 (Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 14
29666). The present case is assigned to Judge William T. Thurman.

The Debtor's counsel is Annette W. Jarvis, Esq., Jeffrey M.
Armington, Esq., Benjamin J. Kotter, Esq., and Michael F. Thomson
Esq., at Dorsey & Whitney LLP, in Salt Lake City, Utah.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as its counsel.  Ray Quinney &
Nebeker P.C. serves as local counsel.  FTI Consulting, Inc. serves
its financial advisor.


NET DATA: Files Amended Schedules of Assets and Liabilities
-----------------------------------------------------------
Net Data Centers, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California amended schedules of assets and
liabilities, disclosing:

     Name of Schedule              Assets         Liabilities
     ----------------            -----------      -----------
  A. Real Property                        $0
  B. Personal Property            $9,566,908
  C. Property Claimed as
     Exempt
  D. Creditors Holding
     Secured Claims                                $1,845,051
  E. Creditors Holding
     Unsecured Priority
     Claims                                           $24,975
  F. Creditors Holding
     Unsecured Non-Priority
     Claims                                       $11,482,347
                                 -----------      -----------
        Total                     $9,566,908      $13,352,373

A copy of the schedules is available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/NetData_108_amendedSAL_May27.pdf

The Debtor later filed amendments to its Schedule B, a copy of
which is available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/NetData_111_amendedSAL_B_May27.pdf

In its original schedules, the Debtor disclosed $9,110,070 in
assets and $5,236,687 in liabilities.  

                    About Net Data Centers

Net Data Centers, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 15-12690) on Feb. 23, 2015.  Pervez
P. Delawalla, the president & CEO, signed the petition.  The
Hon. Sheri Bluebond is assigned to the case.  William F Govier,
Esq., at Lesnick Prince & Pappas LLP, serves as counsel to the
Debtor.

The U.S. trustee appointed three creditors to serve on the
Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee is
represented by Buchalter Nemer, APC.



NET DATA: Files List of Creditors Holding Largest Unsecured Claims
------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Data Centers, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California a list of creditors holding the
largest unsecured claims:

   Creditor                    Nature of Claim     Amount of Claim
   --------                    ---------------     ---------------
DuPont Fabros                  Note Payable            $6,619,151
1212 New York Ave NW
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005

Wells Fargo-Charter            Bank Account            $1,598,570
Holdings Inc.                  Collateral
Department 887995
Los Angeles, CA 90088-7995

Digital Realty Trust           Rent, Note Payable      $1,140,856
2260 East El Segundo Blvd.
El Segundo, CA 90245

Grizzy Ventures, LLC           Rent                      $733,619
1212 New York Ave NW
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005

Chad Long                      Commissions               $641,476
2010-B Gates Ave.
Redondo Beach, CA 90278

GIP 7th Street, Inc.            Rent, power, key cards    $603,070
c/o Digital Reaty Trust
600 W. 7th Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017

Whale Ventures, LLC            Rent                      $551,280
1211 New York Ave NW
Suite 900
Washington , DC 20005

Lemur Properties               Rent                      $307,263
1212 New York Ave NW
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005

Anschutz Entertainment Group   Customer Deposit          $162,248

Terry Spoors                   Employment Claims         $120,000

Fox Properties, LLC            Rent                      $114,346

Stratacore, Inc.               Referral Fees             $100,069

Clearview                      Customer Deposit           $81,145

DLL Financial Services, Inc.   Equipment                  $78,968

Leaf Capital                   Equipment                  $50,348

IFS Corporation                Corporate Insurance        $45,699

Avant Communications           Network Services           $34,961

Navsite   Customer             Deposits                   $33,110

Zayo Group                     Network Services           $24,733

Manhattan Beach Trading, Inc.  Customer Deposit            $2,264

                    About Net Data Centers

Net Data Centers, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 15-12690) on Feb. 23, 2015.  Pervez
P. Delawalla, the president & CEO, signed the petition.  The
Hon. Sheri Bluebond is assigned to the case.  William F Govier,
Esq., at Lesnick Prince & Pappas LLP, serves as counsel to the
Debtor.

The Debtor disclosed, in an amended schedules, $9,566,908 in assets
and $13,352,373 in liabilities.  In its original schedules, the
Debtor disclosed $9,110,070 in assets and $5,236,687 in
liabilities.  

The U.S. trustee appointed three creditors to serve on the
Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee is
represented by Buchalter Nemer, APC.


NET DATA: Temporary Legal Service Contract With Landau Approved
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Sheri Bluebond of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California granted Net Data Centers' amended
motion for order employing Law Offices of Paul A. Beck, A
Professional Corporation, as general bankruptcy counsel.

The Court said that the employment order is amended to approve the
Temporary Legal Service Contract with Lewis R. Landau,
attorney-at-law.

On June 10, 2015 the Court entered an employment order granting the
Beck application.  On June 4, the Debtor filed its supplement to
the Beck application to include approval of a Temporary Legal
Service Contract with Mr. Landau.  The Debtor proposed to pay Mr.
Landau at his hourly rate of $450.

The Court approved the Beck application but was unable to include
approval of the supplement based on the recent filing thereof.

The Debtor is represented by:

         Paul A. Beck, Esq.
         Lewis R. Landau, Esq.
         Law Offices of Paul A. Beck, APC
         13701 Riverside Drive, Suite 701
         Sherman Oaks, CA 91423
         Tel: (818) 501-1141
         Fax: (818) 501-1241
         E-mail: pab@pablaw.org
                 lew@landaunet.com

                    About Net Data Centers

Net Data Centers, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 15-12690) on Feb. 23, 2015.  Pervez
P. Delawalla, the president & CEO, signed the petition.  The
Hon. Sheri Bluebond is assigned to the case.  William F Govier,
Esq., at Lesnick Prince & Pappas LLP, serves as counsel to the
Debtor.

The Debtor disclosed, in an amended schedules, $9,566,908 in assets
and $13,352,373 in liabilities.  In its original schedules, the
Debtor disclosed $9,110,070 in assets and $5,236,687 in
liabilities.  

The U.S. trustee appointed three creditors to serve on the
Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee is
represented by Buchalter Nemer, APC.



NEW YORK LIGHT: Has Interim Authority to Use M&T Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert E. Littlefield, Jr., of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for Northern District of New York gave New York Light Energy,
LLC, et al., interim authority to use cash collateral securing
their prepetition indebtedness from Manufacturers and Traders Trust
Company.

The Debtors are authorized to incur postpetition indebtedness to
the limited extent that: (a) advances made by the Lender to Light
Energy Fund, III, L.P., after the Petition Date pursuant to the
Fund Loan Agreements will be secured, covered, and included within
the scope of repayment of: (i) the Debtor Guaranties, and (ii) the
Debtor Security Agreements, and (iii) the Post-Petition Energy
Lien, and (b) the Debtors will comply with their obligations
pursuant to the Fund Loan Agreements with respect to the
Postpetition LEF Advances.

The final hearing on the Cash Collateral Request is set for August
12, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.  Any objections must be filed on or before
August 5.

                            About New York Light Energy

Founded in 2009 and based in Latham, New York, New York Light
Energy, LLC, designs and installs medium-scale solar arrays in New
York State and Massachusetts.  The Company has installed solar
arrays on more than 180 industrial, commercial, municipal, and
residential sites, with a total of over 15 megawatts of capacity to
date.

NYLE and its affiliates commenced Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases
(Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 15-11121) in Albany, New York, on
May 27, 2015.  

The Debtors tapped Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, as counsel.
Judge Robert E. Littlefield Jr. is assigned to the cases.

The Bankruptcy Court set Nov. 23, 2015, as the last day for
creditors to file proofs of claim.


NEW YORK LIGHT: U.S. Trustee Forms Three-Member Creditors Panel
---------------------------------------------------------------
William K. Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2, appointed
three creditors to serve in an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of New York Light Energy, LLC, et
al.:

      1. Flex Electrical Constructors, Inc.
         Attn: Kevin J. Haggerty, president
         c/o Flex Electric LLC
         2134 3rd Avenue
         Watervliet, NY 12189
         Tel: (518) 449-1407
         Fax: (518) 449-3197
         E-mail: khaggerty@flexelectric.com

         Represented by:
         Mark W. Couch, Esq.
         Couch Dale Marshall, PC
         29 British America Boulevard
         Latham, NY 12110
         Tel: (518) 220-9577
         Fax: (518) 220-9587
         E-mail: mcouch@couchdalemarshall.com

      2. Panel Claw, Inc.
         Attn: Thomas Ringler, CFO
         1570 Osgood Street, #2100
         North Andover, MA 01845
         Tel: (978) 688-4900
         Fax: (978) 688-5100
         E-mail: TRingler@panelclaw.com

      3. CS Arch
         Attn: Richard Peckham, vice president
         40 Beaver Street
         Albany, NY 12207
         Tel: (518) 463-8068
         Fax: (518) 463-8069
         E-mail: rpeckham@csarchpc.com

         Represented by:
         William Ryan, Esq.
         Tabner, Ryan and Keniry, LLP
         18 Corporate Woods Boulevard
         Albany, NY 12211
         Tel: (518) 465-9500 ext. 303
         Fax: (518) 465-5112
         E-mail: ufr@trklaw.com

                    About New York Light Energy

Founded in 2009 and based in Latham, New York, New York Light
Energy, LLC, designs and installs medium-scale solar arrays in New
York State and Massachusetts.  The Company has installed solar
arrays on more than 180 industrial, commercial, municipal, and
residential sites, with a total of over 15 megawatts of capacity
to
date.

NYLE and its affiliates commenced Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases
(Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 15-11121) in Albany, New York, on
May 27, 2015.  

The Debtors tapped Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, as counsel.
Judge Robert E. Littlefield Jr. is assigned to the cases.

The Bankruptcy Court set Nov. 23, 2015, as the last day for
creditors to file proofs of claim.


NICHOLS CREEK: Aug. 17 Hearing on Whitney Bid for Case Dismissal
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida will
convene a hearing on Aug. 17, 2015, at 2:30 p.m., to consider
creditor Whitney Bank's motion to dismiss the Chapter 11 case of
Nichols Creek Development, LLC.

The Court also ordered that the final evidentiary hearing on the
Bank's motion to dismiss, motion for relief from stay, and Debtor's
opposition will be set for a date no earlier than June 22, and not
during the time period of July 10, through July 21.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on April 16, 2015,
Whitney Bank, formerly known as Hancock Bank, is asking the Court
to dismiss the Chapter 11 case, as a bad faith filing; or in the
alternative, grant relief from the automatic stay.  Whitney Bank,
as assignee of FDIC as receiver for People's First Community Bank,
said that the real property of the Debtor subject to the mortgage
is underdeveloped real property owned located in Duval County,
Florida.  Whitney Bank also said that the Debtor is a single assets
real estate with no hope or ability proposing a viable, confirmable
plan of reorganization.

Hawkins Avenue Corp., a secured creditor, and the Debtor are
opposing dismissal of the case.   

As reported in the March 13 edition of the TCR, Hawkins Avenue
avers the interests of the creditors of the estate are better
served by allowing the sale of the property to close and the
proceeds of the sale to be held in trust, so that the Court may
later determine the priorities and amounts due the respective
parties.

The Debtor in opposing the dismissal, says Whitney Bank, formerly
cannot establish bad faith and is not entitled to relief under
Section 362 or Section 1112 of the Bankruptcy Code.  Additionally,
the Debtor said that there is a substantial equity cushion in the
property for Whitney and the property is not declining in value.
In fact, the Debtor notes that it agreed, subject to Court
approval, to sell the property for $14,900,000.

                      About Nichols Creek

Nichols Creek Development, LLC, sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy for
protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 14-04699) on Sept. 26, 2014,
in Jacksonville, Florida.  R.L. Mitchell signed the petition as
member manager.  

The Debtor owns 270+ acre parcel of river front real property
commonly known as 9595 New Berlin Road Court, Jacksonville,
Florida.  In its schedules, the Debtor said the property is valued
at $21.8 million and pledged as collateral to secured creditors
owed a total of $11.6 million.

The Law Offices of Jason A. Burgess, LLC, serves as the Debtor's
counsel.

The Court will convene a hearing on July 28, 2015, to consider
adequacy of amended disclosure statement explaining the plan of
liquidation that intends to pay off secured creditors from the
proceeds of the auction for its 270-acre property in Jacksonville,
Florida.  According to the Amended Disclosure Statement, the Debtor
now contemplates an auction to be held within 90 days following
confirmation of the Plan.



NORTHSHORE MAINLAND: Retains Prime Clerk LLC as Claims Agent
------------------------------------------------------------
Northshore Mainland Services Inc. and its affiliated debtors sought
and obtained permission from Judge Kevin J. Carey of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ Prime Clerk
LLC as claims and noticing agent in their Chapter 11 Cases, nunc
pro tunc to the Petition Date.

As Claims and Noticing Agent, Prime Clerk is expected to, among
other things:

   (1) Prepare and serve required notices and documents in the
Debtors' cases, including without limitation, (i) notice of the
commencement of the cases and the initial meeting of creditors
under Bankruptcy Code Sec. 341(a), (ii) notice of any claims bar
date, (iii) notices of transfers of claims, (iv) notices of
objections to claims and objections to transfers of claims, (v)
notices of any hearings on a disclosure statement and confirmation
of the Debtors' plan or plans of reorganization, including under
Bankruptcy Rule 3017(d), (vi) notice of the effective date of any
plan, and (vii) all other notices, orders, pleadings, publications
and other documents as the Debtors or Court may deem necessary or
appropriate for an orderly administration of the cases;

   (2) Maintain an official copy of the Debtors' schedules of
assets and liabilities and statements of financial affairs as
applicable, listing the Debtors' known creditors and the amounts
owed;

   (3)(i) maintain (A) a list of all potential creditors, equity
holders and other parties in interest and (B) a "core" mailing list
consisting of all parties described in Bankruptcy Rule 2002 and
those parties that have filed a notice of appearance pursuant to
Bankruptcy Rule 9010 and (ii) update and make said lists available
upon request by a party in interest or the Clerk;

   (4) as necessary, furnish a notice to all potential creditors of
the last date for filing proofs of claim and a form for filing a
proof of claim, after such notice and form are approved by the
Court, and notifying such potential creditors of the existence,
amount and classification of their respective claims as set forth
in the Schedules, which may be effected by inclusion of such
information (or the lack thereof, in cases where the Schedules
indicate no debt due to the subject party) on a customized proof of
claim form provided to potential creditors;

   (5) maintain a post office box or address for the purpose of
receiving claims and returned mail, and process all mail received;
and

   (6) for all notices, motions, orders or other pleadings or
documents served, prepare and file or cause to be filed with the
Clerk an affidavit or certificate of service within 7 business days
of service which includes (i) either a copy of the notice served or
the docket number(s) and title(s) of the pleading(s) served, (ii) a
list of persons to whom it was mailed (in alphabetical order) with
their addresses, (iii) the manner of service, and (iv) the date
served.

Thomas M. Dunlap, President of Baha Mar Ltd., tells the Court that
prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors provided Prime Clerk a
$40,000 retainer. Prime Clerk seeks to first apply the retainer to
all prepetition invoices, and thereafter, to have the retainer
replenished to the original retainer amount, and thereafter, to
hold the retainer under the Engagement Agreement during the Chapter
11 Cases as security for the payment of fees and expenses incurred
under the Engagement Agreement. Following termination of the
Engagement Agreement, Prime Clerk will return to the Debtors any
amount of the retainer that remains.

Michael J. Frishberg, Co-President and Chief Operating Officer at
Prime Clerk, filed a declaration with the Court in support of the
Debtors' application to employ Prime Clerk.

                       About Baha Mar

Orlando, Florida-based Northshore Mainland Services Inc., Baha Mar
Enterprises Ltd., and their affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on June 29, 2015 (Bankr. D.Del.,
Case No. 15-11402).  Baha Mar owns, and is in the final stages of
developing, a 3.3 million square foot resort complex located in
Cable Beach, Nassau, The Bahamas.

The case is assigned to Judge Kevin J. Carey.

The Debtors are represented by Paul S. Aronzon, Esq., and Mark
Shinderman, Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, in Los
Angeles, California; and Gerard Uzzi, Esq., Thomas J. Matz, Esq.,
and Steven Z. Szanzer, Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy
LLP, in New York.  The Debtors' Delaware counsel are Laura Davis
Jones, Esq., James E. O'Neill, Esq., Colin R. Robinson, Esq., and
Peter J. Keane, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware.  The Debtors' Bahamian counsel is Glinton
Sweeting O'Brien.  The Debtors' special litigation counsel is
Kobre & Kim LLP.  The Debtors' construction counsel is Glaser Weil
Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP.

The Debtors' investment banker and financial advisor is Moelis
Company LLC.  The Debtors' claims and noticing agent is Prime
Clerk LLC.


NURSES’ REGISTRY: May Use Cash Collateral Through July 30
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Gregory R. Schaaf of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Lexington Division,
granted in part Nurses' Registry and Home Health Corporation's
emergency motion for a preliminary injunction or temporary
restraining order and granted its expedited motion for interim use
of cash collateral.

The case before Judge Schaaf is NURSES' REGISTRY AND HOME, HEALTH
CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her, capacity
as Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human
Services; CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES; and
ADVANCEMED CORPORATION, Defendants, Case No.: 15-51278, ADV. NO.
15-5074, (Bankr. E.D. KY)

On July 1, 2015, the Court, in an oral ruling, granted the
emergency motion of Nurses' Registry for a Preliminary Injunction
or Temporary Restraining Order in part and granted Plaintiff's
Expedited Motion for Interim Use of Cash Collateral in full,
setting Plaintiff's Motions for a final hearing on July 30, 2015,
and enjoining the Defendants from suspending payments up until the
date of that final hearing. On July 2, 2015, the Court entered a
written order memorializing its oral ruling on the injunction and
supplementing its oral findings of fact and conclusions of law with
an additional discussion of authorities cited by Defendants for the
first time in closing argument. It also entered a written order
granting the motion for interim use of cash collateral.

Defendants appealed both orders.

In his Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 9, 2015 available at
http://is.gd/pkAfXtfrom Leagle.com, Judge Schaaf denied
Defendants' motion to stay pending appeal and denied the United
States' motion for stay pending appeal of the order allowing
interim use of cash collateral. The Court said it has carefully
considered the Defendants' remaining arguments that they are likely
to prevail on appeal and finds them without merit. Defendants may
succeed on appeal, but their likelihood of success is far too
uncertain for the Court to grant a stay in spite of the Defendants'
perfunctory arguments on the other stay factors, Judge Schaaf said.
In any event, the Court has previously considered and rejected
Defendants' arguments that their interest in the sanctity of
Medicare Trust Fund dollars outweighs the Debtor's interest, and
that of its employees and patients, in the Debtor's continued
survival. The fact that Defendants do not seek a stay of the
Court's injunction with respect to the $500,000 that they have
already paid under the Court's order only tips the balance of harm
further in the Debtor's favor. Previously, the Court weighed the
balance of harm in an injunction ordering an immediate wire
transfer of $500,000.00, plus de-suspension of the July payments,
and found they weighed in favor of the Debtor. Now, all that is at
stake on Defendants' side is the remaining July payments.

On the other hand, the motion for stay, pending appeal of the
Court's interim cash collateral order, which allowed the Debtor to
spend cash collateral until a final hearing on July 30, 2015,
relies almost entirely on the arguments in the motion to stay the
Court's preliminary injunction, which the Court has already
rejected. The Court, however, has found that the evidence at this
time shows most of the suspended payments are likely untainted by
Defendants' allegations of fraud, and thus property of the Debtor's
estate. Further, enjoining Defendants from suspending payments only
to prohibit the Debtor from spending those payments on payroll and
vital services would render the Court's injunction a practical
nullity, causing the same harms that make stay of the injunction
inappropriate. Having declined to stay its injunction, the Court
will not destroy it. The United States' Motion for Stay Pending
Appeal of the Interim Cash Collateral Order is denied.


OAS SA: Brazilian Cases Recognized as "Foreign Main Proceeding"
---------------------------------------------------------------
Renato Fermiano Tavares, as proposed foreign representative,
requests recognition of three foreign proceedings pending in Brazil
as foreign main proceedings pursuant to Chapter 15 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code.  The foreign debtors -- OAS S.A.,
Construtora OAS S.A., and OAS Investments GmbH -- are currently
debtors in judicial reorganization proceedings pending in the First
Specialized Bankruptcy Court of Sao Paulo.

Judge Stuart M. Bernstein of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
Southern District of New York recognized the Debtors' Brazilian
Bankruptcy Proceedings as foreign main proceedings under Chapter 15
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

The U.S. Court concludes that recognition of the OAS Debtors'
Brazilian Bankruptcy Proceedings is not manifestly contrary to the
public policy of the United States, and recognition is granted.
The U.S. Court's conclusion is without prejudice to Aurelius' and
Alden's right to challenge any action that Tavares seeks to take in
the U.S. Court, including, in particular, a request to recognize
and enforce a plan or plans approved by the Brazilian Court.  The
U.S. Court also concludes that Tavares was duly appointed and
qualified to act as the "foreign representative" in the Chapter 15
proceedings.

The Chapter 15 case is In re: OAS S.A., et al., Chapter 15, Debtors
in Foreign Proceedings, Case No. 15-10937 (SMB), (JOINTLY
ADMINISTERED), (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).

A full-text copy of Judge Stuart M. Bernstein's Memorandum Decision
dated July 13, 2015 available at http://is.gd/9KnX8hfrom
Leagle.com.

John K. Cunningham, Esq. -- jcunningham@whitecase.com -- Gregory M.
Starner, Esq. -- gstarner@whitecase.com -- Kimberly A. Haviv, Esq.
-- khaviv@whitecase.com -- Richard S. Kebrdle, Esq. --
rkebrdle@whitecase.com -- of WHITE & CASE LLP; Susheel Kirpalani,
Esq. -- susheelkirpalani@quinnemanuel.com -- Michael Carlinsky,
Esq. -- michaelcarlinsky@quinnemanuel.com -- Benjamin Finestone,
Esq. -- benjaminfinestone@quinnemanuel.com -- of QUINN EMANUEL
URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP serve as counsel for for Renato Fermiano
Tavares as Petitioner and Foreign Representative.

Allan S. Brilliant, Esq. -- allan.brilliant@dechert.com -- Robert
J. Jossen, Esq. -- robert.jossen@dechert.com -- Gary J. Mennitt,
Esq. -- gary.brooks@dechert.com -- Craig P. Druehl, Esq. --
craig.druehl@dechert.com -- Stephen M. Wolpert, Esq. --
stephen.wolpert@dechert.com -- of DECHERT LLP serve as counsel for
Aurelius Capital Management, LP, and Alden Global Capital LLC.

Howard Seife, Esq. -- hseife@chadbourne.com -- Andrew Rosenblatt,
Esq. -- arosenblatt@chadbourne.com -- and Eric Daucher, Esq. --
edaucher@chadbourne.com -- of CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP serve as
counsel for the Joint Provisional Liquidators of OAS Finance
Limited.

                            About OAS S.A.

The OAS Group is among the largest and most experienced
infrastructure companies in Brazil, focusing on heavy engineering
and equity investments in infrastructure projects located in and
outside Brazil and abroad for both public and private clients.  The
OAS Group provides services in 22 countries in Latin America, the
Caribbean and Africa.

Based in Sao Paulo, Brazil, OAS S.A. is the holding company at the
apex of the OAS Group.  Its share capital is divided between CMP
Participacoes Ltda. (owned by Mr. Cesar de Araujo Mata Pires),
which has a 90% stake, and LP Participacoes e Engenharia Ltd.
(owned by Mr. Jose Adelmario Pinheiro Filho, which has a 10%
stake.

Amid an investigation into alleged corruption and money laundering,
and missed interest payments, OAS S.A. and its affiliates
Construtora OAS S.A., OAS Investments GmbH, and OAS Finance Limited
on March 31, 2015, commenced judicial reorganization proceedings
before the First Specialized Bankruptcy Court of Sao Paulo pursuant
to Federal Law No. 11.101 of February 9, 2005 of the laws of the
Federative Republic of Brazil.

On April 15, 2015, OAS S.A., et al., filed Chapter 15 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 15-10937) in Manhattan, in
the United States to seek U.S. recognition of the Brazilian
proceedings.  Renato Fermiano Tavares, as foreign representative,
signed the petitions.  The cases are assigned to Judge Stuart M.
Bernstein. White & Case, LLP, serves as counsel in the U.S. cases.

OAS S.A. listed at least US$1 billion in assets and liabilities.


ONE2ONE COMMS: 3d Cir. Reverses Dismissal of Plan Order Appeal
--------------------------------------------------------------
The United Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the
District Court's dismissal of Quad/Graphics Inc.'s appeal from the
Bankruptcy Court's confirmation of One2One Communications, LLC's
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

Quad/Graphics alleged that the District Court abused its discretion
in dismissing its appeal as equitably moot and asked the Third
Circuit to overrule its adoption of equitable mootness in In Re
Continental Airlines, 91 F.3d 553, 560 (3d Cir. 1996) (en banc),
contending that the doctrine is unconstitutional and contrary to
the Bankruptcy Code.

The Third Circuit found the District Court to have abused its
discretion and held that the case did not involve a sufficiently
complex bankruptcy reorganization such that dismissal on the basis
of equitable mootness would be proper.

The case is IN RE: ONE2ONE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Debtor
QUAD/GRAPHICS, INC., Appellant, Case No. 13-3410 (3d Cir.).

A full text copy of Judge Greenaway, Jr.'s Opinion dated July 21,
2015, is available at http://is.gd/jxloXwfrom Leagle.com.

Quad/Graphics, Inc. is represented by:

          Courtney A. Schael, Esq.
          ASHFORD SCHAEL
          1371 Morris Avenue
          Union, NJ 07083
          
            -- and --

          Timothy F. Nixon, Esq.
          GODFREY & KAHN
          333 Main Street, Suite 600
          P.O. Box 13067
          Green Bay, WI 54307
          Email: tnixon@gklaw.com

One2One Communications, LLC is represented by:

          Michael D. Sirota, Esq.
          David M. Bass, Esq.
          COLE SCHOTZ P.C.
          25 Main Street, Court Plaza North
          P.O. Box 800
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Email: msirota@coleschotz.com
                 dbass@coleschotz.com

            -- and --

          Joseph DiPasquale, Esq.
          Henry M. Karwowski, Esq.
          Richard D. Trenk, Esq.
          TRENK, DIPASQUALE, DELLA FERA & SODONO
          347 Mount Pleasant Avenue, Suite 300
          West Orange, NJ 07052
          Email: jdipasquale@trenklawfirm.com
                 hkarwowski@trenklawirm.com
                 rtrenk@trenklawfirm.com

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by:

          Kenneth A. Rosen, Esq.
          LOWENSTEIN SANDLER PC
          65 Livingston Avenue
          Roseland, NJ 07068
          Email: krosen@lowenstein.com

The United States Trustee is represented by:

          Martha R. Hildebrandt, Esq.
          OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
          One Newark Center, Suite 2100
          Newark, NJ 07102

One2One Communications, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 12-27311) on July 10, 2012.  The Debtor tapped
Richard D. Trenk, Esq., at Trenk, Dipasquale, Della Fera & Sodono,
P.C., as counsel.  The Debtor disclosed $354,088 in assets and
$13,687,311 in liabilities.


PACIFIC GOLD: Sells Interest in Rae Gold and Black Rock Canyon
--------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific Gold Corp. sold all of its interest in Nevada Rae Gold,
Inc. and the Black Rock Canyon Mine for the following
consideration: $300,000, which was all used to satisfy some of the
immediate accounts payable of Nevada Rae Gold, Inc.; $100,000 due
to the Company on July 15, 2016; and a royalty of 4% on all Nevada
Rae Gold, Inc. gold sales up to a maximum total royalty payments of
$720,000.  The royalty payments can be bought out by the purchaser
for $500,000 any time prior to July 15, 2016.  All of the payments
are subject to a 10% finder's fee which has not yet been paid.

                        About Pacific Gold

Las Vegas, Nev.-based Pacific Gold Corp. is engaged in the
identification, acquisition, and development of prospects believed
to have gold mineralization.  Pacific Gold through its
subsidiaries currently owns claims, property and leases in Nevada
and Colorado.

The Company reported a net loss of $696,000 on $0 of revenue for
the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared with a net loss of
$515,000 on $0 of revenue for the same period in 2013.

The Company's balance sheet at Sept. 30, 2014, showed $1.1 million
in total assets, $3.81 million in total liabilities and a
stockholders' deficit of $2.71 million.

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC, issued a "going concern" qualification on
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31,
2013, citing that the Company has incurred losses from operations,
has negative working capital, and is in need of additional capital
to grow its operations so that it can become profitable.  These
factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


PATRIOT COAL: Court Approves Executive Bonus Plan
-------------------------------------------------
Jacqueline Palank, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported
that a bankruptcy court on July 22 approved Patriot Coal Corp.'s
plan to pay potentially more than $6 million in employee bonuses,
overruling challenges brought by a government watchdog and the
miners and retirees whose benefits are threatened by the company's
upcoming sale.

According to the report, citing attrition by Patriot's employees
and the risks of its bid to close a sale of its mining operations,
Judge Keith L. Phillips of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Richmond,
Va., authorized bonuses for Patriot's top executives and middle
managers.

                        About Patriot Coal

Patriot Coal Corporation is a producer and marketer of coal in the
United States.  Patriot and its subsidiaries control 1.4 billion
tons of proven and probable coal reserves -- including owned and
leased assets in the Central Appalachia basin (in West Virginia
and Ohio) and Southern Illinois basin (in Kentucky and Illinois)
and their operations consist of eight active mining complexes in
West Virginia.

Patriot Coal first sought Chapter 11 protection on July 9, 2012,
and, on Dec. 18, 2013, won approval of its bankruptcy-exit plan
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri.  The plan turned over most of the ownership of the
company to bondholders that include New York hedge fund Knighthead
Capital Management LLC.  The linchpins of the plan were a global
settlement among the Debtors, the United Mine Workers of America,
and two third parties -- Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal,
Inc. -- and a commitment by a consortium of creditors, led by
Knighthead, to backstop two rights offerings that funded the plan.

Patriot Coal Corporation and its subsidiaries commenced new
Chapter 11 cases (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. 15-32450) in
Richmond, Virginia, on May 12, 2015.  The cases are assigned to
Judge Keith L. Phillips.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as counsel; Kutak Rock
L.L.P., as co-counsel; Centerview Partners LLC as investment
bankers; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as restructuring
advisors; and Prime Clerk LLC, as claims and administrative agent.

The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of Patriot Coal
Corp. appointed seven creditors of the company to serve on the
official committee of unsecured creditors.

Patriot Coal estimated more than $1 billion in assets and debt.


PATRIOT COAL: Creditors Have Until July 27 to File Proofs of Claim
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
established these deadlines in relation to the Chapter 11 cases of
Patriot Coal Corporation, et al.:

   * General Claims Bar Date:   July 27, 2015, at 5:00 p.m.
   * Admin. Claims Bar Date:    July 27, 2015
   * Governmental Bar Date:     Nov. 9, at 5:00 p.m.

Proofs of claim must be submitted to the Debtor's notice and claims
agent, by U.S. Mail or other hand-delivery system:

         Patriot Coal Corporation
         Claims Processing Center
         c/o Prime Clerk LLC
         830 Third Avenue, 9th Floor
         New York, NY 10022

                        About Patriot Coal

Patriot Coal Corporation is a producer and marketer of coal in the
United States.  Patriot and its subsidiaries control 1.4 billion
tons of proven and probable coal reserves -- including owned and
leased assets in the Central Appalachia basin (in West Virginia and
Ohio) and Southern Illinois basin (in Kentucky and Illinois) and
their operations consist of eight active mining complexes in West
Virginia.

Patriot Coal first sought Chapter 11 protection on July 9, 2012,
and, on Dec. 18, 2013, won approval of its bankruptcy-exit plan
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri.  The plan turned over most of the ownership of the
company to bondholders that include New York hedge fund Knighthead
Capital Management LLC.  The linchpins of the plan were a global
settlement among the Debtors, the United Mine Workers of America,
and two third parties -- Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal,
Inc. -- and a commitment by a consortium of creditors, led by
Knighthead, to backstop two rights offerings that funded the plan.

Patriot Coal Corporation and its subsidiaries commenced new Chapter
11 cases (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. 15-32450) in Richmond,
Virginia, on May 12, 2015.  The cases are assigned to Judge Keith
L. Phillips.

Patriot Coal estimated more than $1 billion in assets and debt.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as counsel; Kutak Rock
L.L.P., as co-counsel; Centerview Partners LLC as investment
bankers; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as restructuring
advisors; and Prime Clerk LLC, as claims and administrative agent.

The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of Patriot Coal
Corp. appointed seven creditors of the company to serve on the
official committee of unsecured creditors.

The directed the U.S. Trustee to form an official committee of
retirees at the behest of Patriot Coal Non-Union Retiree VEBA.

                        *     *     *

The Debtors relate that deadline to file bids for the Debtors'
assets is Sept. 4, 2015, at 5:00 p.m.  An auction will take place
on Sept. 9, at 10:00 a.m.

Patriot Coal on June 3 disclosed that it has filed with the
Bankruptcy Court a letter of intent for a proposed sale of a
substantial majority of its operating assets to Blackhawk Mining,
LLC, as well as a motion outlining bidding procedures.  The
contemplated transaction would be consummated pursuant to a chapter
11 plan and is subject to documentation of a definitive asset
purchase agreement, bankruptcy court approval of the sale,
confirmation of a chapter 11 plan, and other customary conditions.

Patriot's mining operations and customer shipments will continue in
the ordinary course during the sale process.

Under the terms of the letter of intent, Blackhawk would issue to
Patriot's secured lenders new debt securities totaling
approximately $643 million plus Class B Units providing them an
ownership stake in Blackhawk.  In addition, Blackhawk would assume
or replace surety bonds supporting reclamation and related
liabilities associated with the purchased assets.
Patriot Coal Corporation filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Virginia its schedules of assets and
liabilities, disclosing:

     Name of Schedule              Assets         Liabilities
     ----------------            -----------      -----------
  A. Real Property                        $0
  B. Personal Property        $1,967,742,294*
  C. Property Claimed as
     Exempt
  D. Creditors Holding
     Secured Claims                              $611,921,114*
  E. Creditors Holding
     Unsecured Priority
     Claims                                                $0
  F. Creditors Holding
     Unsecured Non-Priority
     Claims                                    $1,760,817,423*
                                 -----------      -----------
        Total                 $1,967,742,294*  $2,372,738,537*

* plus undetermined amount

A copy of the schedules is available for free at

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/PATRIOTCOAL_412_sal.pdf

The Debtors filed an amendment to their statement of financial
affairs, a copy of which is available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/PATRIOTCOAL_465_amended_sal.pdf

                        About Patriot Coal

Patriot Coal Corporation is a producer and marketer of coal in the
United States.  Patriot and its subsidiaries control 1.4 billion
tons of proven and probable coal reserves -- including owned and
leased assets in the Central Appalachia basin (in West Virginia and
Ohio) and Southern Illinois basin (in Kentucky and Illinois) and
their operations consist of eight active mining complexes in West
Virginia.

Patriot Coal first sought Chapter 11 protection on July 9, 2012,
and, on Dec. 18, 2013, won approval of its bankruptcy-exit plan
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri.  The plan turned over most of the ownership of the
company to bondholders that include New York hedge fund Knighthead
Capital Management LLC.  The linchpins of the plan were a global
settlement among the Debtors, the United Mine Workers of America,
and two third parties -- Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal,
Inc. -- and a commitment by a consortium of creditors, led by
Knighthead, to backstop two rights offerings that funded the plan.

Patriot Coal Corporation and its subsidiaries commenced new Chapter
11 cases (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. 15-32450) in Richmond,
Virginia, on May 12, 2015.  The cases are assigned to Judge Keith
L. Phillips.

Patriot Coal estimated more than $1 billion in assets and debt.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as counsel; Kutak Rock
L.L.P., as co-counsel; Centerview Partners LLC as investment
bankers; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as restructuring
advisors; and Prime Clerk LLC, as claims and administrative agent.

The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of Patriot Coal
Corp. appointed seven creditors of the company to serve on the
official committee of unsecured creditors.

The directed the U.S. Trustee to form an official committee of
retirees at the behest of Patriot Coal Non-Union Retiree VEBA.

                        *     *     *

The Debtors relate that deadline to file bids for the Debtors'
assets is Sept. 4, 2015, at 5:00 p.m.  An auction will take place
on Sept. 9, at 10:00 a.m.

Patriot Coal on June 3 disclosed that it has filed with the
Bankruptcy Court a letter of intent for a proposed sale of a
substantial majority of its operating assets to Blackhawk Mining,
LLC, as well as a motion outlining bidding procedures.  The
contemplated transaction would be consummated pursuant to a chapter
11 plan and is subject to documentation of a definitive asset
purchase agreement, bankruptcy court approval of the sale,
confirmation of a chapter 11 plan, and other customary conditions.

Patriot's mining operations and customer shipments will continue in
the ordinary course during the sale process.

Under the terms of the letter of intent, Blackhawk would issue to
Patriot's secured lenders new debt securities totaling
approximately $643 million plus Class B Units providing them an
ownership stake in Blackhawk.  In addition, Blackhawk would assume
or replace surety bonds supporting reclamation and related
liabilities associated with the purchased assets.



PATRIOT COAL: Files Schedules of Assets and Liabilities
-------------------------------------------------------
Patriot Coal Corporation filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Virginia its schedules of assets and
liabilities, disclosing:

     Name of Schedule              Assets         Liabilities
     ----------------            -----------      -----------
  A. Real Property                        $0
  B. Personal Property        $1,967,742,294*
  C. Property Claimed as
     Exempt
  D. Creditors Holding
     Secured Claims                              $611,921,114*
  E. Creditors Holding
     Unsecured Priority
     Claims                                                $0
  F. Creditors Holding
     Unsecured Non-Priority
     Claims                                    $1,760,817,423*
                                 -----------      -----------
        Total                 $1,967,742,294*  $2,372,738,537*

* plus undetermined amount

A copy of the schedules is available for free at

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/PATRIOTCOAL_412_sal.pdf

The Debtors filed an amendment to their statement of financial
affairs, a copy of which is available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/PATRIOTCOAL_465_amended_sal.pdf

                        About Patriot Coal

Patriot Coal Corporation is a producer and marketer of coal in the
United States.  Patriot and its subsidiaries control 1.4 billion
tons of proven and probable coal reserves -- including owned and
leased assets in the Central Appalachia basin (in West Virginia and
Ohio) and Southern Illinois basin (in Kentucky and Illinois) and
their operations consist of eight active mining complexes in West
Virginia.

Patriot Coal first sought Chapter 11 protection on July 9, 2012,
and, on Dec. 18, 2013, won approval of its bankruptcy-exit plan
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri.  The plan turned over most of the ownership of the
company to bondholders that include New York hedge fund Knighthead
Capital Management LLC.  The linchpins of the plan were a global
settlement among the Debtors, the United Mine Workers of America,
and two third parties -- Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal,
Inc. -- and a commitment by a consortium of creditors, led by
Knighthead, to backstop two rights offerings that funded the plan.

Patriot Coal Corporation and its subsidiaries commenced new Chapter
11 cases (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. 15-32450) in Richmond,
Virginia, on May 12, 2015.  The cases are assigned to Judge Keith
L. Phillips.

Patriot Coal estimated more than $1 billion in assets and debt.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as counsel; Kutak Rock
L.L.P., as co-counsel; Centerview Partners LLC as investment
bankers; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as restructuring
advisors; and Prime Clerk LLC, as claims and administrative agent.

The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of Patriot Coal
Corp. appointed seven creditors of the company to serve on the
official committee of unsecured creditors.

The directed the U.S. Trustee to form an official committee of
retirees at the behest of Patriot Coal Non-Union Retiree VEBA.

                        *     *     *

The Debtors relate that deadline to file bids for the Debtors'
assets is Sept. 4, 2015, at 5:00 p.m.  An auction will take place
on Sept. 9, at 10:00 a.m.

Patriot Coal on June 3 disclosed that it has filed with the
Bankruptcy Court a letter of intent for a proposed sale of a
substantial majority of its operating assets to Blackhawk Mining,
LLC, as well as a motion outlining bidding procedures.  The
contemplated transaction would be consummated pursuant to a chapter
11 plan and is subject to documentation of a definitive asset
purchase agreement, bankruptcy court approval of the sale,
confirmation of a chapter 11 plan, and other customary conditions.

Patriot's mining operations and customer shipments will continue in
the ordinary course during the sale process.

Under the terms of the letter of intent, Blackhawk would issue to
Patriot's secured lenders new debt securities totaling
approximately $643 million plus Class B Units providing them an
ownership stake in Blackhawk.  In addition, Blackhawk would assume
or replace surety bonds supporting reclamation and related
liabilities associated with the purchased assets.



PEABODY ENERGY: Debt Trades at 19% Off
--------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Peabody Energy
Power Corp is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 81.50
cents-on-the- dollar during the week ended Friday, July 17, 2015,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing and
reported in the July 23, 2015 edition of The Wall Street Journal.
This represents a decrease of 0.60 percentage points from the
previous week, The Journal relates. Peabody Energy Power Corp pays
325 basis points above LIBOR to borrow under the facility.  The
bank loan matures on September 20, 2020, and carries Moody's Ba3
rating and Standard & Poor's BB+ rating.  The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 234 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended July
17.



PHYSIOTHERAPY HOLDINGS: Reverses Ruling on Huron Assumption
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Leonard P. Stark of the United States District Court for
Delaware concluded that a series of agreements entered into between
Physiotherapy Holdings, Inc., et al., and Huron Consulting
Services, LLC, constitute a single contract and held that the
Debtors cannot assume the benefits of those agreements and reject
their burdens.  Accordingly, Judge Stark remanded the case to the
Bankruptcy Court to allow the Debtors to choose between rejecting
or assuming the Agreements as one.

The case is HURON CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC, Appellant, v.
PHYSIOTHERAPY HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Appellees, CIV. NO.
14-693-LPS, (D. Del.).

The bankruptcy case is IN RE: PHYSIOTHERAPY HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,
Debtors, Bankruptcy Case No.: 13-12965-KG (Bankr. D. Del.).

A full-text copy of Judge Stark's Memorandum Opinion dated July 13,
2015, is available at http://is.gd/ze71kHfrom Leagle.com.

Eric D. Schwartz, Esq. -- eschwartz@mnat.com -- and Andrew R.
Remming, Esq. -- aremming@mnat.com -- of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT &
TUNNELL, LLP and Brandy A. Sargent, Esq. --
brandy.sargent@stoel.com -- of STOEL RIVES, LLP serve as counsel
for Appellant Huron Consulting Services, LLC.

Domenic E. Pacitti, Esq. -- dpacitti@klehr.com -- and Michael W.
Yurkewicz, Esq. -- myurkewicz@klehr.com -- of KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY
BRANZBURG, LLP; Jonathan S. Henes, Esq. --
jonathan.henes@kirkland.com --  Eric F. Leon, Esq. --
eric.leon@kirkland.com -- Nicole L. Greenblatt, Esq. --
nicole.greenblatt@kirkland.com -- David S. Meyer, Esq. --
david.meyer@kirkland.com -- Nathaniel J. Kritzer, Esq. --
nathaniel.kritzer@kirkland.com -- and Matthew Kapitanyan, Esq. --
matthew.kapitanyan@kirkland.com -- of KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP serve
as counsel for the Reorganized Debtors-Appellees Physiotherapy
Holdings, Inc.

                       About Physiotherapy Holdings

Physiotherapy Holdings, Inc., and its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
13-12965) on Nov. 12, 2013.  The Debtors are the largest pure-play
provider of outpatient physical therapy services in the United
States with a national footprint of 581 outpatient rehabilitation
and orthotics & prosthetics clinics located in 29 states plus the
District of Columbia.

The Debtor is represented by Domenic E. Pacitti, Esq., and Michael
W. Yurkewicz, Esq., at Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg, LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware; Morton Branzburg, Esq., at Klehr Harrison
Harvey Branzburg LLP, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Jonathan
S. Henes, P.C., Esq., Nicole L. Greenblatt, Esq., and David S.
Meyer, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York.

The Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Noteholders is represented by
Michael L. Tuchin, Esq., and David A. Fidler, Esq., at Klee,
Tuchin, Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, in Los Angeles, California.

U.S. Bank, National Association, as Bridge Loan Agent, is
represented by Stacey Rosenberg, Esq., at Latham & Watkins LLP, in
Los Angeles, California.

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Senior Notes
Indenture Trustee, is represented by Eric A. Schaffer, Esq., at
Reed Smith, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

The Consenting Shareholders are represented by Michael J. Sage,
Esq., Matthew L. Larrabee, Esq., and Nicole B. Herther-Spiro, Esq.,
at Dechert LLP, in New York.

Roberta A. DeAngelis, the United States Trustee for Region 3
notified the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
that a committee of unsecured creditors has not been appointed in
the Chapter 11 cases of Physiotherapy Holdings, Inc.

Physiotherapy Holdings implemented a prepackaged Chapter 11
reorganization plan on Dec. 31, 2013.  The Plan was confirmed Dec.
23.  The Plan gives noteholders all the stock in exchange for debt
and a predicted recovery of 40.3%.  Noteholders voted for the plan
before the Chapter 11 filing.


POINT BLANK: Needs Until Dec. 31 to Remove Actions
--------------------------------------------------
SS Body Armor I, Inc., f/k/a Point Blank Solutions, Inc., and its
debtor affiliates, ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware to further extend the period within which the Debtors
may remove actions initiated prior to the Petition Date through and
including December 31, 2015.

Laura Davis Jones, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware, states that the Debtors believe it is prudent
to seek an extension of the time period to file notices of removal
to protect their rights to remove the Actions.  Their current
efforts are focused on (a) consummating the settlement with the
Class Plaintiffs, which will not only provide the Debtors with an
immediate source of funds for the chapter 11 plan and an exit
strategy for hese chapter 11 cases, but also will resolve
long-standing, complex and expensive litigation in the Court, the
Delaware District Court and the EDNY District Court, and (b)
pursuing confirmation of the amended joint Chapter 11 plan proposed
by SS Body Armor I, Inc and the Creditors’ Committee, Ms. Jones
further states.

Ms Jones adds that in light of the current status of the Debtors'
Chapter 11 cases, the extension of time for removing actions will
afford them a reasonable and necessary opportunity to make
fully-informed decisions concerning removal of any Action, and will
assure that they do not forfeit valuable rights under Section 1452
with respect to any pending or prospective litigation commenced by
or against them.

The Debtors are represented by:

         Laura Davis Jones, Esq.
         Alan J. Kornfeld, Esq.
         James E. O'Neill, Esq.
         Elissa A. Wagner, Esq.
         919 N. Market Street, 17th Floor
         P.O. Box 8705
         Wilmington, DE 19899-8705
         Telephone: (302) 652-4100
         Facsimile: (302) 652-4400
         Email: ljones@pszjlaw.com
                akornfeld@pszjlaw.com
                joneill@pszjlaw.com
                ewagner@pszjlaw.com

                            About Point Blank

Headquartered in Pompano Beach, Florida, Point Blank Solutions,
Inc. -- http://www.pointblanksolutionsinc.com/-- designs and      
produces body armor systems for the U.S. Military, Government and
law enforcement agencies, as well as select international markets.

The Company maintains facilities in Pompano Beach, Florida, and
Jacksboro, Tennessee.

The Company's former chief executive officer and chief operating
officer were convicted in September 2010 of orchestrating a $185
million fraud.

Point Blank Solutions, formerly DHB Industries, filed for Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 10-11255) on April 14,
2010.

Laura Davis Jones, Esq., Alan J. Kornfeld, Esq., David M.
Bertenthal, Esq., and Timothy P. Cairns, Esq., at Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP, serve as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.
Olshan Grundman Frome Rosenweig & Wolosky LLP serves as corporate
counsel.  Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions serves as claims and notice
agent.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors and a separate Official Committee of Equity Security
Holders in the case.  Ian Connor Bifferato, Esq., and Thomas F.
Driscoll III, Esq., at Bifferato LLC; and Carmen H. Lonstein, Esq.,
Andrew P.R. McDermott, Esq., and Lawrence P. Vonckx, Esq., at Baker
& McKenzie LLP, serve as counsel for the Official Committee of
Equity Security Holders.  Robert M. Hirsh, Esq., and George P.
Angelich, Esq., at Arent Fox LLP, serve as counsel to the Creditors
Committee, and Frederick B. Rosner, Esq., and Brian L. Arban, Esq.,
at the Rosner Law Group LLC, serve as co-counsel.

In October 2011, the Debtors sold substantially all assets to Point
Blank Enterprises, Inc.  The lead debtor changed its name to SS
Body Armor I, Inc., following the sale.


PUREWAL ENTERPRISES: Knights Franchise Default Judgment Bid Nixed
-----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Esther Salas denied the plaintiff's motion for
default judgment in the case captioned KNIGHTS FRANCHISE SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. PUREWAL ENTERPRISES,
LTD, a Washington Limited Partnership; and GURINDERJIT PUREWAL, an
individual, Defendants, CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-881 (ES)(D.N.J.).

On February 12, 2014, Knights Franchise Systems, Inc. filed a
complaint against Purewal Enterprises, LTD. Knights' counsel
certified that despite diligent efforts and inquiry, the Recon
Management Group was unable to locate Purewal Enterprises to
effectuate personal service upon the defendant.  The counsel
further certified that a copy of the Summons and Complaint was
served upon the defendant via certified and regular mail.

On August 20, 2014, Knights filed a motion for default judgment
against Purewal Enterprises. The motion was unopposed.

Judge Salas, however, denied the motion because the plaintiff has
not demonstrated proper service. She held that Knights has not
established that the Summons and Complaint were sent return receipt
requested, as required under New Jersey rules.

A copy of the June 25, 2015 opinion and order is available at
http://is.gd/oIMpi6from Leagle.com.

KNIGHTS FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
represented by PATRICK EUGENE DURING –
Patrick.during@leclairryan.com -- LeClair Ryan LLP & BRYAN PAUL
COUCH – bryan.couch@leclairryan.com -- LeClair Ryan.

                  About Purewal Enterprises, LTD

Kent, Washington-based Purewal Enterprises PVT, Inc., dba Knights
Inn and dba Ramada Conference Center, filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 10-25589) on December 30,
2010.  Matthew J. Cunanan, Esq., at DC Law Group PLLC, served as
Chapter 11 counsel.  In its petition, the Debtor scheduled assets
of $2,943,690 and liabilities of $7,120,922.  A list of the
Company's 20 largest unsecured creditors filed together with the
petition is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb10-25589.pdf The petition was signed
by Gurinderjit Purewal, president/CEO.

On October 6, 2011, the bankruptcy court dismissed Purewal
Enterprises' Chapter 11 bankruptcy.


QUEST SOLUTION: Reports Preliminary Revenues for the 2nd Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Quest Solution, Inc., released preliminary revenues for the second
quarter of its fiscal year 2015, ending June 30, 2015 (2Q 2015).

Mr. Tom Miller, chief executive officer of the Company, indicated:
"In order to release timely financial information to our
stockholders, we are releasing preliminary revenues for 2Q 2015.
Earnings will not be released until just prior to the filing of our
quarterly report on Form 10-Q.  We expect to file our 10-Q with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on or before the August 15,
2015 deadline."

Revenues reported for both the three and six months ended June 30,
2015, incorporate total bookings revenue, which allows for
comparison to the prior year period where service contracts were
fully recorded in the quarter they were signed.  Beginning in Q1
2015, the Company began spreading service revenue recognition
throughout the life of the contract.  The estimated deferred
service contract revenue as of June 30, 2015, is approximately
$6.85 million with corresponding service contract cost and
commission of $6 million, for approximately $850,000 which would
have been added to the adjusted pro forma EBITDA for the six months
ended June 30, 2015, but is now spread over the life of the
contracts.  The Company anticipates this number to continue to grow
through the end of 2015 with the increases being offset by revenue
being recognized in 2016.

Preliminary Results for Q2 2015:

   * Preliminary net GAAP revenues for the three months ended
     June 30, 2015, increased approximately to $13.5 million which
     represents a 26% sequential increase compared to Q1 2015 of
     $10.7 million.
       
   * Accounts receivable grew to approximately $9.7 million as of
     June 30, 2015, from approximately $8.5 million as of
     March 31, 2015.

Preliminary Results for the Six months ended June 30, 2015:

   * Preliminary net revenues for the six months ended June 30,
     2015, were approximately $24 million.
       
   * Gross margin is anticipated to be approximately 22%, year to
     date.
       
   * Business outlook and activity for the year remains strong re-
     affirms its full year FY2015 guidance of Booked Revenue
     between $62-$68 million, representing top line growth between

     5-15% and generating positive adjusted EBITDA in the second
     quarter, with sequential improvement each quarter for the
     remainder of the year.

Operational Highlights:

   * Quest Total Solutions as a Service (QTSaaS) model which the
     Company recently announced, has received a great initial
     response from our customers and the Company is working with
     additional vendors to grow this product offering.
       
   * In December 2014, the Company announced the expansion of
     their sales force into New York and Chicago.  The Company has
     been pleased with the growth it has achieved in these markets

     and are in the process of bringing on additional sales
     support and engineers in its Chicago location within the next

     30 days.
       
   * The Company's due diligence process with the previously
     announced Viascan acquisition is moving forward and the
     Company anticipates closing the transaction in the third
     quarter of 2015.  Viascan is expected to contribute
     incremental revenue of $22-$25 million (USD) and be accretive

     to Adjusted EBITDA.

The Company also announced that as the reporting period for the
quarter end approaches it will be announcing the date, time and
call in number for the quarterly investor conference call.

                       About Quest Solution

Quest Solution (formerly known as Amerigo Energy, Inc.) is a
national mobility systems integrator with a focus on design,
delivery, deployment and support of fully integrated mobile
solutions.  The Company takes a consultative approach by offering
end to end solutions that include hardware, software,
communications and full lifecycle management services.  The highly
tenured team of professionals simplifies the integration process
and delivers proven problem solving solutions backed by numerous
customer references.  Motorola, Intermec, Honeywell, Panasonic,
AirWatch, Wavelink, SOTI and Zebra are major suppliers which Quest
Solution uses in its systems.

Quest Solution reported net income of $302,000 on $37.3 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared with a
net loss of $1.12 million on $4,070 of total revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $33.4 million in total
assets, $32.6 million in total liabilities and $791,000 in total
stockholders' equity.


QUICKSILVER RESOURCES: Amends Statement of Financial Affairs
------------------------------------------------------------
Quicksilver Resources Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware amended its statement of financial affairs
after a proceeding was inadvertently excluded from the list of
suits and proceedings to which the Debtor is or was a party within
one year preceding the bankruptcy filing.  A copy of the amendment
is available for free at:

http://bankrupt.com/misc/QuicksilverResources_455_amendedSAL.pdf

The Debtor disclosed total assets of $765,401,486 and liabilities
of $2,074,197,088 in its schedules of assets and liabilities.

                    About Quicksilver Resources

Quicksilver Resources Inc. (OTCMKTS: KWKAQ) is an exploration and
production company engaged in the development and production of
long-lived natural gas and oil properties onshore North America
from unconventional reservoirs including shale gas, and coal bed
methane.  Following more than 30 years of operating as a private
company, Quicksilver became public in 1999.

The Company has U.S. offices in Fort Worth, Texas; Glen Rose,
Texas; Steamboat Springs, Colorado; Craig, Colorado and Cut Bank,
Montana.  The Company's Canadian subsidiary, Quicksilver Resources
Canada Inc., is headquartered in Calgary, Alberta.

Quicksilver Resources Inc. and certain of its affiliates filed
voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
15-10585) on March 17, 2015.  Quicksilver's Canadian subsidiaries
were not included in the chapter 11 filing.

The bankruptcy cases are assigned to Judge Laurie Selber
Silverstein.  The Company's legal advisors are Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld LLP in the U.S. and Bennett Jones in Canada.  Richards
Layton & Finger, P.A., is legal co-counsel in the cases.  Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc. is serving as financial advisor.  Garden City
Group Inc. is the claims and noticing agent.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2014, showed $1.21 billion
in total assets, $2.35 billion in total liabilities and total
stockholders' deficit of $1.14 billion.

The Court extended the Debtors' exclusive plan filing period until
Oct. 13, 2015, and their exclusive solicitation period until
Dec. 14, 2015.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed five creditors to serve on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee
retained Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP as counsel;
and Landis Rath & Cobb LLP as Delaware counsel.  It retained
Capstone Advisory Group, LLC and Capstone Valuation Services, LLC
as financial advisors; and Moelis & Company LLC as investment
banker.



QUICKSILVER RESOURCES: BRG OK'd as Substitute Financial Advisor
---------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware authorized
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the Chapter 11
cases of Quicksilver Resources Inc., et al., to retain Berkeley
Research Group, LLC as substitute financial advisor, nunc pro tunc
to June 1, 2015.

The Court also ordered that Capstone Advisory Group, LLC, and
Capstone Valuation Services, LLC, will no longer act as financial
advisor to the Committee.

To the best of the Committee's knowledge, BRG is a "disinterested
person" as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

                    About Quicksilver Resources

Quicksilver Resources Inc. (OTCMKTS: KWKAQ) is an exploration and
production company engaged in the development and production of
long-lived natural gas and oil properties onshore North America
from unconventional reservoirs including shale gas, and coal bed
methane.  Following more than 30 years of operating as a private
company, Quicksilver became public in 1999.

The Company has U.S. offices in Fort Worth, Texas; Glen Rose,
Texas; Steamboat Springs, Colorado; Craig, Colorado and Cut Bank,
Montana.  The Company's Canadian subsidiary, Quicksilver Resources
Canada Inc., is headquartered in Calgary, Alberta.

Quicksilver Resources Inc. and certain of its affiliates filed
voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
15-10585) on March 17, 2015.  Quicksilver's Canadian subsidiaries
were not included in the chapter 11 filing.

The bankruptcy cases are assigned to Judge Laurie Selber
Silverstein.  The Company's legal advisors are Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld LLP in the U.S. and Bennett Jones in Canada.  Richards
Layton & Finger, P.A., is legal co-counsel in the cases.  Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc. is serving as financial advisor.  Garden City
Group Inc. is the claims and noticing agent.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2014, showed $1.21 billion
in total assets, $2.35 billion in total liabilities and total
stockholders' deficit of $1.14 billion.

The Court extended the Debtors' exclusive plan filing period until
Oct. 13, 2015, and their exclusive solicitation period until Dec.
14, 2015.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed five creditors to serve on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee
retained Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP as counsel;
and Landis Rath & Cobb LLP as Delaware counsel.  It retained
Capstone Advisory Group, LLC and Capstone Valuation Services, LLC
as financial advisors; and Moelis & Company LLC as investment
banker.


R & S ST. ROSE: Bid to Set Aside Dismissal of Appeal Denied
-----------------------------------------------------------
District Judge James C. Mahan denied the appellant's motion to set
aside dismissal of appeal in the case captioned COMMONWEALTH LAND
TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant(s), v. R & S ST. ROSE, LLC,
Appellee (s), APPEAL 14-51, CASE NO. 2:14-CV-1399 JCM (D. Nev.).

Commonwealth filed its notice of appeal on August 27, 2014.  The
court on April 28, 2015, dismissed the appeal with prejudice due to
Commonwealth's failure to comply with the court's previous orders
to file the designation of reporters and recorders transcripts with
the clerk of bankruptcy court so the certificate of record on
appeal could be transmitted to the district court.

Commonwealth filed a motion to set aside the dismissal of its
appeal, claiming excusable neglect.

Judge Mahan denied the motion in light of Commonwealth's failure to
comply with the court's orders and the applicable procedural rules.
He pointed out that Commonwealth failed to provide evidence that it
filed anything with the district court or the bankruptcy court
notifying anyone of its difficulty obtaining the transcript.
Further, Commonwealth's counsel failed to file a notice of change
of address as required by the local rules.

A copy of the June 24, 2015 order is available at
http://is.gd/mZNvLnfrom Leagle.com.

Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Appellant, represented
by Scott E Gizer -- sgizer@earlysullivan.com -- Early Sullivan
Wright Gizer & McRae LLP.

R & S St. Rose, LLC, Appellee, represented by Samuel A. Schwartz,
The Schwartz Law Firm.

                    About R & S St. Rose Lenders

Las Vegas, Nevada-based R & S St. Rose Lenders, LLC, filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 11-14973)
on April 4, 2011.  Zachariah Larson, Esq., at Larson & Stephens,
served as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  According to its
schedules, the Debtor disclosed $12,041,574 in total assets and
$19,688,291 in total debts as of the Petition Date.  Rose Lenders
amended its schedules disclosing $12,041,574 in assets and
$24,502,319 in liabilities.

Affiliate R & S St. Rose, LLC, filed a separate Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 11-14974) on April 4, 2011.
According to its schedules, it disclosed $16,821,500 in total
assets and $48,293,866 in total debts.


R&G PROPERTIES: Delta Trading's Bid for Final Judgment Denied
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge John Robert Blakey of the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, denied Delta
Trading Company's motion for entry of final judgment in the case
captioned Republic Bank of Chicago, Plaintiff, v. Michael Desmond,
as Trustee, et al., Defendant, CASE NO. 13 C 6835 (N.D. Ill.).

An adversary proceeding was filed concerning the use of real
property located at 5700 North Central Avenue, in Chicago, under
the terms of a lease that was purportedly assigned to Republic Bank
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.  Republic had sought
to exercise the purchase option included in the lease.  However,
Michael Desmond, as the Trustee for the bankruptcy of R&G
Properties that owned the Property, notified Republic of his intent
not to honor the Purchase Option.

The adversary complaint also named Delta Trading Company, as a
defendant, because Delta purports to have acquired a mortgage on
the Property after execution of the Lease.  Republic and the
Trustee filed cross motions for summary judgment.

On April 21, 2014, Judge Guzman granted the Trustee's motion for
summary judgment and denied Republic's motion.  He found that the
language of the option to purchase precluded its assignment, and
therefore Republic, as assignee of the lease, could not exercise
the option.

Delta filed a motion for entry of final judgment, in order to allow
it to proceed on its mortgage foreclosure suit in Cook County.
Republic responded with a motion for interlocutory appeal.

Delta's motion was denied because it was not timely filed and the
claim on which Delta seeks appeal is not a "separate claim" from
the claims that would remain before the Court.

Republic's motion was likewise denied because it was not timely
filed, the issue presented is not a question of law, the resolution
on appeal would not speed up litigation, and the issue is not
contestable.

The Trustee also moved for judgment for possession of the Property
based on Count II of the Amended Counterclaim.  Republic Bank
responded by moving for dismissal of Counterclaim Count II, because
it had already vacated the property and given possession to the
Trustee.  Accordingly, Judge Blakey denied the Trustee's motion for
judgment of possession as moot and granted Republic's motion to
dismiss.

A full-text copy of Judge Blakey's July 17, 2015 memorandum opinion
and order is available at http://is.gd/hzL4eQfrom Leagle.com.

Republic Bank of Chicago is represented by:
          
          Edward P. Freud, Esq.
          Michael Benjamin Bregman, Esq.
          RUFF, FREUD, BREEMS & NELSON LTD.
          200 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2020
          Chicago, Ill. 60601
          Tel: (312) 263-3890
          Fax: (312) 263-1345
          Email: epfreud@rfbnlaw.com
                 mbregman@rfbnlaw.com

             -- and –-

          Phillip Shawn Wood, Esq.
          James B. Sowka, Esq.
          Michael Ryan Pinkston, Esq.
          SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
          131 South Dearborn Street Suite 2400
          Chicago, IL  60603-557
          Tel: (312) 460-5000
          Fax: (312) 460-7000
          Email: swood@seyfarth.com
                 jsowka@seyfarth.com
                 rpinkston@seyfarth.com

Michael K Desmond is represented by:
          
          James R. Figliulo, Esq.
          Marc S. Porter, Esq.
          Michael K. Desmond, Esq.
          William G Cross, Esq.
          FIGLIULO & SILVERMAN, P.C.
          10 S. LaSalle Street Suite 3600
          Chicago, IL 60603
          Tel: (312) 251-4600
          Fax: (312) 251-4610
          Email: jfigliulo@fslegal.com
                 mporter@fslegal.com
                 mdesmond@fslegal.com
                 wcross@fslegal.com

Delta Trading Company, Inc. is represented by:

          Richard H. Fimoff, Esq.
          Richard Lee Stavins, Esq.
          Robert J. Trizna, Esq.
          ROBBINS, SALOMON & PATT, LTD.
          180 N. LaSalle Street Suite 3300
          Chicago, IL 60601
          Tel: (312) 782-9000
          Fax: (312) 782-6690
          Email: rfimoff@rsplaw.com
                 rstavins@rsplaw.com
                 rtrizna@rsplaw.com


R. ALAN KITE: Bid for Partial Dismissal of Son's Appeal Granted
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Phyllis M. Keaty of the Court of Appeals of Louisiana, Third
Circuit, granted Robert Alan Kite's motion for partial dismissal of
his son's appeal from a judgment in favor of his father, denying
the son's objection of lack of jurisdiction, dismissing the son's
remaining claims against his father with prejudice, rendering
judgment against the son on father's reconventional demand, and
awarding the father attorney fees.

Judge Keaty amended in part, reversed in part, and affirmed in part
the trial court's judgment.  The judgment rendered in favor of
Robert Kite and Kite Bros., L.L.C., and against Alan Kite is
amended to provide that legal interest on the portion of the award
representing the $354,207 in attorney fees owed by Alan to Kite
Bros. will run from the date of judgment.  In addition, that
portion of the judgment against Alan and in favor of Kite Bros. for
$29,625, which represented the payment of a thing not owed is
reversed.  In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

The cases are R. ALAN KITE, v. KITE BROS., LLC, ET AL., KITE BROS.,
LLC, ET AL. v. ALAN KITE, ET AL., Case No.: 14-807, CONSOLIDATED
WITH 14-808, (La. App.).

A full-text copy of Judge Keaty's Decision dated July 15, 2015,
available at http://is.gd/ZdH1CTfrom Leagle.com.

Kenneth Michael Wright, Esq. -- kwright@smithduggan.com -- of
Kenneth Michael Wright, LLC serves as counsel for
Plaintiff/Appellant, R. Alan Kite.

Scott J. Scofield, Esq., Andrea Albright Crawford, Esq., Phillip W.
DeVilbiss, Esq., Scofield, Gerard, Pohorelsky, Gallaugher & Landry,
serve as counsel for Defendants/Appellees, Kite Bros., LLC, Robert
J. Kite.


RADIOSHACK CORP: Amends Schedules of Assets and Liabilities
-----------------------------------------------------------
RS Legacy Corporation filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware further amended schedules of assets and
liabilities, disclosing:

     Name of Schedule              Assets         Liabilities
     ----------------            -----------      -----------
  A. Real Property               $23,475,630
  B. Personal Property        $1,071,021,650
  C. Property Claimed as
     Exempt
  D. Creditors Holding
     Secured Claims                              $500,904,020
  E. Creditors Holding
     Unsecured Priority
     Claims                                       $1,515,311
  F. Creditors Holding
     Unsecured Non-Priority
     Claims                                    $2,598,679,044
                                 -----------      -----------
        Total                 $1,094,497,280  $3,101,098,375

A copy of the document is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/RadioShack_2628_amendedSAL.pdf

RadioShack disclosed total assets of $1,094,497,280 and total
liabilities of $3,092,735,792 in a prior iteration of the
schedules.

                   About RadioShack Corporation

Headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas, RadioShack (OTCMKTS: RSHCQ) --
http://www.radioshackcorporation.comÂ-- is a retailer of
mobile
technology products and services, as well as products related to
personal and home technology and power supply
needs.  RadioShack's retail network includes more than 4,300
company-operated stores in the United States, 270 company-operated
stores in Mexico, and approximately 1,000 dealer and other outlets
worldwide.

RadioShack Corporation and affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-10197) on Feb. 5, 2015. Judge
Kevin J. Carey presides over the case.

David G. Heiman, Esq., Greg M. Gordon, Esq., Amanda M. Suzuki,
Esq., Jonathan M. Fisher, Esq., Thomas A. Howley, Esq., and Paul
M.
Green, Esq., at Jones Day serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy
counsel.

David M. Fournier, Esq., Evelyn J. Meltzer, Esq., and John H.
Schanne, II, Esq., at Pepper Hamilton LLP serve as
co-counsel.  Carlin Adrianopoli at FTI Consulting, Inc., is the
Debtors' restructuring advisor. Maeva Group, LLC, is the Debtors'
Turnaround advisor. Lazard Freres & Co. LLC is the Debtors'
investment banker.   A&G Realty Partners is the Debtors' real
estate advisor.  Prime Clerk is the Debtors' claims and
noticing agent.

In their Petitions, the Debtors disclosed total assets of $1.2
billion, versus total debts of $1.3 billion.

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and Cooley LLP represent the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors as co-counsel.  Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc., serves as financial advisor and investment
banker.  The bankruptcy case is assigned to Judge Brendan L.
Shannon.



RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Court Rules on Objection to Aniels' Claims
---------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn sustained the ResCap Liquidating
Trust's and the ResCap Borrower Claims Trust's objection to (i)
Claim Numbers 112 and 114 filed by Erlinda Abibas Aniel, and (ii)
Claim Numbers 416 and 417 filed by Erlinda Abibas Aniel, Fermin
Solis Aniel, and Marc Jason Aniel.

The Claims are based on several state and federal causes of action
that the Aniels asserted against the Debtors GMAC Mortgage, LLC
("GMACM") and Executive Trustee Services, LLC arising from the
Debtors' foreclosure on two separate properties allegedly owned by
the Aniels.

Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn sustained the Objection to the Estiva
Claims.  He disallowed and expunged the claims in their entirety.

The Objection to the Aniel Claims were, however, overruled without
prejudice as to the Aniels' causes of action premised on the
invalidity of the 2011 assignment to GMACM of the deed of trust
encumbering the Aniel Property, including their causes of action
for wrongful foreclosure, to set aside the trustee's sale,
declaratory relief, fraudulent concealment, and violations of
California's Unfair Competition Law. The Objection to the Aniel
Claims was sustained as to all other causes of action.

A copy of the June 30, 2015 memorandum opinion is available at
http://is.gd/3R9CS3from Leagle.com.

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP, By: Norman S. Rosenbaum, Esq. --
nrosenbaum@mofo.com -- Jordan A. Wishnew, Esq. -- jwishnew@mofo.com
-- Jessica J. Arett, Esq. -- jarett@mofo.com -- New York, New York,
Attorneys for ResCap Borrower Claims Trust.

ERLINDA ABIBAS ANIEL, FERMIN SOLIS ANIEL, MARC JASON ANIEL, By:
Erlinda Abibas Aniel, Hillsborough, California, Pro Se.


RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Objection to Claim No. 2267 Partly Sustained
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Martin Glenn Judge Martin Glenn of the United States
Bankruptcy Court for Southern District of New York sustained ResCap
Borrower Claims Trust's objection to claim no. 2267 filed by
William J. Futrell.

Debtors Homecomings Financial, LLC, and later Debtor GMAC Mortgage,
LLC, serviced Futrell's home mortgage loan for a number of years.
Futrell's Claim arises from the Debtors' alleged mishandling of his
loan servicing.  Specifically, Futrell's Claim is premised on the
following causes of action: (i) violations of the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. Section 2601, et seq.; (ii)
violations of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.
Section 1692 et seq.; and (iii) common law fraud.  The Court
concludes that Futrell fails to state a claim for most of these
causes of action. However, factual issues preclude the resolution
of Futrell's cause of action under section 6 of RESPA to the extent
it is based on GMACM's alleged failure to respond to certain of
Futrell's alleged qualified written requests.

Judge Glenn sustained in part and overruled in part the Objection
to Claim No. 2267.  The Objection to Futrell's claim under section
6 of RESPA is overruled without prejudice to the extent such claim
is based on his purported QWRs dated October 30, 2009, October 31,
2009, November 13, 2009, December 2009, and October 23, 2011.  The
Objection is sustained as to all other causes of action.

The Trust's counsel is directed to confer with Futrell's counsel to
discuss possible settlement of the remaining issues in their
dispute and confer regarding the scheduling of any discovery and an
evidentiary hearing, as well as further briefing before trial.

The bankruptcy case is In re: RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al.,
Chapter 11, Debtors, CASE NO. 12-12020 (MG), JOINTLY ADMINISTERED
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).

A full-text copy of Judge Glenn's Memorandum Opinion and Order
dated July 14, 2015, is available at http://bit.ly/1LoX9J5from
Leagle.com.

Norman S. Rosenbaum, Esq. -- nrosenbaum@mofo.com -- Jordan A.
Wishnew, Esq. -- jwishnew@mofo.com -- and James A. Newton, Esq. --
jnewton@mofo.com -- of MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP serve as counsel for
ResCap Borrower Claims Trust

Thomas D. Margolis, Esq., of THOMAS D. MARGOLIS, ESQ. serves as
counsel for William J. Futrell

                    About Residential Capital

Residential Capital LLC, the unprofitable mortgage subsidiary of
Ally Financial Inc., filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 12-12020) on May 14, 2012.

Neither Ally Financial nor Ally Bank is included in the bankruptcy
filings.

ResCap, one of the country's largest mortgage originators and
servicers, was sent to Chapter 11 with 50 subsidiaries amid
"continuing industry challenges, rising litigation costs and
claims, and regulatory uncertainty," according to a company
statement.

ResCap disclosed $15.7 billion in assets and $15.3 billion in
liabilities at March 31, 2012.

Centerview Partners LLC and FTI Consulting are acting as financial
advisers to ResCap.  Morrison & Foerster LLP is acting as legal
adviser to ResCap.  Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP is the
conflicts counsel.  Rubenstein Associates, Inc., is the public
relations consultants to the Company in the Chapter 11 case.
Morrison Cohen LLP is advising ResCap's independent directors.

Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLP is the claims and notice agent.

Ray C. Schrock, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York, serves
as counsel to Ally Financial.

ResCap sold most of the businesses for a combined $4.5 billion.
The Bankruptcy Court in November 2012 approved ResCap's sale of its
mortgage servicing and origination platform assets to Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC and Walter Investment Management Corporation for $3
billion; and its portfolio of roughly 50,000 whole loans to
Berkshire Hathaway for $1.5 billion.

Judge Martin Glenn in December 2013 confirmed the Joint Chapter 11
Plan co-proposed by Residential Capital and the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.


RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Ocwen Obtains Partial Summary Judgment
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Martin Glenn of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
Southern District of New York granted in part and denied in part
cross-motions for summary judgment in the case captioned OCWEN LOAN
SERVICING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE RESCAP LIQUIDATING TRUST, a
Delaware Statutory Trust, Defendant, ADV. PROC. NO. 14-02388 (MG),
(S.D.N.Y.).

Cross-motions for summary judgment filed in the adversary
proceeding and with respect to an administrative expense claim
filed against the Debtors.  The Adversary Proceeding and
administrative claim arise out of Ocwen's purchase of Residential
Capital, LLC's mortgage loan servicing platform and loan servicing
rights.  The parties' dispute centers on alleged breaches of the
parties' agreement.  They disagree about who bears third-party
vendor costs for storage, segregation, removal, repackaging, and
relocation of the mortgage loan servicing files.  This is no
trifling issue -- as much as $11 million as an administrative
expense may be at stake; this would result in a potentially big hit
for prepetition creditor distributions.

Judge Glenn granted the Plaintiff's motion in part and denied it in
part, and denied the Defendant's motion in its entirety.  First,
Judge Glenn held that Ocwen is correct that section V.1 of the
Statement of Work for Records Management Services governs the
Segregation and Delivery of the servicing files acquired by Ocwen
and requires that ResCap, and now the Trust, bear the Segregation
and Delivery costs under certain circumstances.

Second, the Court does not decide whether section V.1 imposes a
condition precedent upon Ocwen.  On the one hand, the Trust cannot
rely on Ocwen's failure to satisfy the purported condition
precedent because ResCap clearly frustrated Ocwen's attempted
satisfaction -- at least with respect to the directed Segregation
and Delivery of certain files stored at Iron Mountain.  On the
other hand, there are disputed issues of fact and law whether
ResCap's breach of section V.1 of the RM SOW is material and/or
constitutes repudiation such that Ocwen would be excused from
satisfying a condition precedent as to other servicing files.

Third, ResCap (and now the Trust) must bear the storage costs for
the servicing files that ResCap and/or its parent company retain,
but the amount of those charges is not established by the summary
judgment record.

Fourth, Ocwen must bear the storage costs for the servicing files
that Ocwen acquired at least for some period of time. Though Ocwen
argues that if ResCap had not breached the agreement, Ocwen's files
would have been transferred from third-party storage many months
ago thereby cutting off further storage charges for those files,
the summary judgment record does not permit the Court to resolve
this issue either.

Finally, the Court is unable on the summary judgment record to
determine the amount of damages Ocwen is entitled to recover.
Further proceedings, including discovery if necessary, will be
required to resolve the remaining issues if the parties are unable
to resolve them on their own.

The bankruptcy case is In re: RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al.,
Chapter 11, Debtors, NO. 12-12020 (MG)(Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).

A full-text copy of Judge Glenn's Memorandum Opinion and Order
dated July 14, 2015, is available at http://bit.ly/1M93bxWfrom
Leagle.com.

Joseph J. Saltarelli, Esq. -- jsaltarelli@hunton.com -- and Patrick
L. Robson, Esq. -- probson@hunton.com -- of Hunton & Williams LLP
serve as counsel for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Jamie A. Levitt, Esq. -- jlevitt@mofo.com -- and Todd M. Goren,
Esq. -- tgoren@mofo.com -- of Morrison & Foerster LLP serve as
counsel for Rescap Liquidating Trust.

                          About Residential Capital

Residential Capital LLC, the unprofitable mortgage subsidiary of
Ally Financial Inc., filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 12-12020) on May 14, 2012.

Neither Ally Financial nor Ally Bank is included in the bankruptcy
filings.

ResCap, one of the country's largest mortgage originators and
servicers, was sent to Chapter 11 with 50 subsidiaries amid
"continuing industry challenges, rising litigation costs and
claims, and regulatory uncertainty," according to a company
statement.

ResCap disclosed $15.7 billion in assets and $15.3 billion in
liabilities at March 31, 2012.

Centerview Partners LLC and FTI Consulting are acting as financial
advisers to ResCap.  Morrison & Foerster LLP is acting as legal
adviser to ResCap.  Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP is the
conflicts counsel.  Rubenstein Associates, Inc., is the public
relations consultants to the Company in the Chapter 11 case.
Morrison Cohen LLP is advising ResCap's independent directors.

Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLP is the claims and notice agent.

Ray C. Schrock, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York, serves
as counsel to Ally Financial.

ResCap sold most of the businesses for a combined $4.5 billion.
The Bankruptcy Court in November 2012 approved ResCap's sale of its
mortgage servicing and origination platform assets to Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC and Walter Investment Management Corporation for $3
billion; and its portfolio of roughly 50,000 whole loans to
Berkshire Hathaway for $1.5 billion.

Judge Martin Glenn in December 2013 confirmed the Joint Chapter 11
Plan co-proposed by Residential Capital and the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.


RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Primary Capital's Bid to Dismiss Suit Denied
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Susan Richard Nelson of the United States District Court for
the District of Minnesota denied Primary Capital Advisors, LLC's
motion to dismiss the case captioned Residential Funding Company,
LLC v. Primary Capital Advisors, LLC, Case No. 13-CV-3451
(SRN/JJK/HB), (D. Minn.).

The lawsuit arises out of Primary Capital's sale of allegedly
defective mortgage loans to Residential Funding, LLC.  Prior to May
2012, RFC was "in the business of acquiring and securitizing
residential mortgage loans," and RFC acquired the loans from
"`correspondent lenders,'" such as Primary Capital.  According to
RFC, its relationship with Primary Capital was governed by a Seller
Contract that incorporated the terms and conditions of the RFC
Client Guide, and "the Contract and Client Guide collectively form
the parties' Agreement [and] set the standards to which Primary
Capital Advisors' loans sold to RFC were expected to adhere."  It
is alleged that, pursuant to the Agreement, Primary Capital made
many representations and warranties regarding the loans.  RFC
claims that Primary Capital is obligated, pursuant to the
Agreement, to compensate RFC for losses and liabilities related to
Primary Capital's breaches of representations and warranties.
Accordingly, RFC filed a lawsuit asserting two causes of action
against Primary Capital.  In Count One, a claim for breach of
contract, RFC alleges that Primary Capital materially breached the
representations and warranties it made to RFC because the mortgage
loans it sold to RFC did not comply with those representations and
warranties.  RFC asserts that these material breaches constitute
Events of Default under the Agreements and have resulted in losses
and liabilities related to the defective loans, as well as losses
associated with defending the lawsuits and proofs of claim that
stem from those loans.  In Count Two, RFC alleges that it is
entitled to indemnification from Primary Capital for those losses
and liabilities.

Judge Nelson denied Primary Capital's motion to dismiss, finding
that RFC has plainly alleged that its relationship with Primary
Capital was governed by a Seller Contract that incorporated the
terms and conditions of the Client Guide and that, pursuant to
those documents, Primary Capital made many representations and
warranties regarding the loans it sold to RFC.  Contrary to Primary
Capital's assertions, is not clear from the pleadings or the
attachments to the pleadings that RFC's allegations are false,
Judge Nelson said.

While Primary Capital has identified language in the Seller
Contract that -- standing alone -- appears to state that the
parties' relationship is governed by the AlterNet Seller Guide
rather than the Client Guide, RFC has identified language in the
Client Guide that -- standing alone -- seems to state that the
parties' relationship is, in fact, governed by the Client Guide's
terms even if Primary Capital was selling loans under the AlterNet
Program, Judge Nelson ruled.  And, although Primary Capital
contends that RFC has improperly attempted to equate the terms
"AlterNet Seller Guide" and "AlterNet Program," the contractual
language is -- at best -- ambiguous, and its interpretation cannot
be resolved on a motion to dismiss, Judge Nelson further ruled.
Accordingly, the Court finds that -- at this stage of the
proceedings -- RFC has sufficiently alleged that its contracts with
Primary Capital included the representations and warranties upon
which it is suing Primary Capital.

A full-text copy of Judge Nelson's Memorandum Opinion and Order
dated July 14, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/A0jn3sfrom
Leagle.com.

Residential Funding Company, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by
Anthony Alden -- anthonyalden@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, David Elsberg -- davidelsberg@quinnemanuel.com
-- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, David L Hashmall,
Felhaber Larson, Donald G Heeman, Felhaber Larson, Edward P Sheu --
esheu@bestlaw.com -- Best & Flanagan LLP, Erica P Taggart, Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Gabriel F Soledad --
gabrielsoledad@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, Isaac Nesser -- isaacnesser@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Jeffrey A Lipps, Carpenter Lipps &
Leland LLP, Jennifer A L Battle, Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP,
Johanna Ong -- johannaong@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Marnie E Fearon, Felhaber Larson, Matthew
R Scheck -- matthewscheck@quinnemanuel.com – Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, Peter E. Calamari --
petercalamari@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
LLP, Richard R Voelbel, Felhaber Larson, Ryan A Olson, Felhaber
Larson, Thomas G Garry -- tgarry@bestlaw.com -- Best & Flanagan
LLP, Bradley T Smith, Felhaber Larson, Jessica J Nelson, Felhaber
Larson & Daniel R Kelly, Felhaber Larson.

ResCap Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony Alden,
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Bradley T Smith, Felhaber
Larson, David Elsberg, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, David
L Hashmall, Felhaber Larson, Donald G Heeman, Felhaber
Larson, Erica P Taggart, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
Gabriel F Soledad, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Isaac
Nesser, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Jeffrey A Lipps,
Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP, Jennifer A L Battle, Carpenter Lipps
& Leland LLP, Johanna Ong, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,
Marnie E Fearon, Felhaber Larson, Matthew R Scheck, Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, Peter E. Calamari, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan LLP, Richard R Voelbel, Felhaber Larson, Ryan A Olson,
Felhaber Larson, Jessica J Nelson, Felhaber Larson & Daniel R
Kelly, Felhaber Larson.

Academy Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by David M
Souders -- souders@thewbkfirm.com -- Weiner Brodsky Kider PC,
Tessa K Somers -- somers@thewbkfirm.com -- Weiner Brodsky Kider
PC, Anthony Gabor, Oberman Thompson & Segal LLC & James L Forman
-- jforman@obermanthompson.com -- Oberman Thompson, LLC.

The Mortgage Outlet, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eldon J
Spencer, Jr -- espencer@losgs.com -- Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer,
Gale & Sayre, Ltd & Stacey L Drentlaw -- sdrentlaw@losgs.com --
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd.

Ark-La-Tex Financial Services, LLC, Defendant, represented by Mark
J Carpenter -- mark@carpenter-law-firm.com -- Carpenter Law Firm
PLLC.

Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc., Defendant, represented by Eldon J
Spencer, Jr, Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd, James M
Jorissen -- jjorissen@losgs.com -- Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale
& Sayre, Ltd & Stacey L Drentlaw, Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale &
Sayre, Ltd.

Guaranty Bank, Defendant, represented by Gregory A Bromen --
gbromen@nilanjohnson.com -- Nilan Johnson Lewis PA, Matthew S.
Vignali -- mvignali@bcblaw.net -- Beck Chaet Bamberger & Polksy SC
& Steven W Jelenchick -- sjelenchick@bcblaw.net -- Beck Chaet
Bamberger & Polsky SC.

First California Mortgage Company, Defendant, represented by
Andrew Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss
-- cmoss@hjlawfirm.com -- Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page
Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J Robert Keena --
jkeena@hjlawfirm.com -- Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Americash, Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld, American
Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC,
Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., Evans D
Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J Robert Keena,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American Mortgage Law
Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law Group.

Broadview Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.


Golden Empire Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Erin
Sindberg Porter -- esindbergporter@greeneespel.com -- Greene Espel
PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble -- jkimble@greeneespel.com – Greene
Espel PLLP, Jenny Gassman Pines -- jgassman-pines@greeneespel.com
-- Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R. Stein -- pstein@bilzin.com - Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona --
ssakona@bilzin.com -- Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Community West Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Christina
Rieck Loukas -- cloukas@winthrop.com -- Winthrop & Weinstine, PA,
Christopher A Camardello -- ccamardello@winthrop.com -- Winthrop &
Weinstine, PA, Jeffrey R Ansel -- jansel@winthrop.com – Winthrop
& Weinstine, PA & Michael A Rosow -- mrosow@winthrop.com --
Winthrop & Weinstine, PA.

Fremont Bank, Defendant, represented by Eldon J Spencer, Jr,
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd, James M Jorissen,
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd & Stacey L Drentlaw,
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd.

First Equity Mortgage Bankers, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Amelia R Selvig -- aselvig@anthonyostlund.com -- Anthony Ostlund
Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D Anthony --
banthony@anthonyostlund.com -- Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA,
Joseph W Anthony -- janthony@anthonyostlund.com -- Anthony Ostlund
Baer & Louwagie PA, Philip R. Stein, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price &
Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod
LLP.

Colonial Savings, F.A., Defendant, represented by Daniel N Moak --
dmoak@briggs.com -- Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla --
dsupalla@briggs.com -- Briggs & Morgan, PA & Mark G Schroeder
--mschroeder@briggs.com -- Briggs & Morgan, PA.

First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by
Kevin J Dunlevy, Beisel & Dunlevy, PA & Michael E Kreun, Beisel &
Dunlevy, PA.

Central Pacific Homeloans, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Central Pacific Bank, Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J
Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American
Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law
Group.

Central Pacific Financial Corp., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Provident Funding Associates, L.P., Defendant, represented by
Daniel N Moak, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs &
Morgan, PA, Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Neil R
O'Hanlon, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

First Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by Gene A Hoff,
Minenko & Hoff & Michael J Minenko, Minenko & Hoff, P.A..

Mortgage Network, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Mortgage Capital Associates, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Amelia R Selvig, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D
Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Joseph W Anthony,
Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Philip R. Stein, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Lenox Financial Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Gina L
Albertson, Albertson Law & Michael D O'Neill, Martin & Squires,
P.A..

E Trade Bank, Defendant, represented by Amelia R Selvig, Anthony
Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer
& Louwagie PA, Joseph W Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie
PA, Philip R. Stein, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP &
Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, Defendant, represented by Amelia
R Selvig, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Amy Y Cho, Shook,
Hardy & Bacon LLP, Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer &
Louwagie PA & Michael P Conway, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP.

PNC Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Adam M Gogolak,
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Amanda Raines Lawrence,
BuckleySandler LLP, Brett J Natarelli, BuckleySandler LLP, Daniel
J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, David A Schooler, Briggs & Morgan,
PA, Elaine P Golin, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Fredrick S
Levin, BuckleySandler LLP, Jonathan M Moses, Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz, Justin V Rodriguez, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz,
Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Richard E Gottlieb,
BuckleySandler LLP.

Mortgage Access Corp., Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J Robert
Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law Group.

Cornerstone Home Lending, Inc., Defendant, represented by Alan H
Maclin, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA
& Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA.

Impac Funding Corporation, Defendant, represented by Erin Sindber
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP,
Katherine M. Swenson, Greene Espel PLLP & Janine Wetzel
Kimble,Greene Espel PLLP.

Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Amelia R
Selvig, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D Anthony,
Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA & Joseph W Anthony, Anthony
Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA.

Hometown Mortgage Services, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group & Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer &
Louwagie PA.

Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Amy L Schwartz, Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered,
Jonathan M Jenkins, JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP, Lara Kayayan, Jenkins
LLP, Navdeep Singh, Jenkins Kayayan LLP & Richard T Thomson, Lapp
Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered.

Wallick & Volk, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J
Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American
Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law
Group.

Branch Banking & Trust Co., Defendant, represented by Jason D
Evans, McGuire Woods LLP, Kelly G Laudon, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP,
Mark A Jacobson, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP, T Richmond McPherson,
III, McGuire Woods LLP & William C Mayberry, Mcguire Woods LLP.

T.J. Financial, Inc., Defendant, represented by Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene Espel
PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R. Stein,
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Stearns Lending, LLC, Defendant, represented by Alan H Maclin,
Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Mark
G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA.

Terrace Mortgage Company, Defendant, represented by Aaron P M
Tady, Coles Barton LLP, C J Schoenwetter, Bowman & Brooke LLP,
John D Sear, Bowman & Brooke LLP, Thomas M Barton, Coles Barton
LLP & Rachelle A Velgersdyk, Bowman & Brooke LLP.

Gateway Bank, F.S.B., Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J
Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American
Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law
Group.

Universal American Mortgage Company, LLC, Defendant, represented
by Enza G Boderone, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Erin
Sindberg Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene
Espel PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R.
Stein, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona,
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Amy L Schwartz,
Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered, Eric P Tuttle,
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Gregory D Phillips, Munger, Tolles &
Olson, LLP, Marc T G Dworsky, Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Michael
E Soloff, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Richard C St John, Munger
Tolles & Olson, Richard T Thomson, Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner &
Pusch, Chartered, Thomas Jacob, Wells Fargo Law Department & Todd J
Rosen, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP.

BMO Harris Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Amanda Raines
Lawrence, BuckleySandler LLP, Brett J Natarelli, BuckleySandler
LLP, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, David A Schooler,
Briggs & Morgan, PA, Fredrick S Levin, BuckleySandler LLP,
Kristopher Knabe, BuckleySandler LLP & Richard E Gottlieb,
BuckleySandler LLP.

Wells Fargo Financial Retail Credit, Inc., Defendant, represented
by Eric P Tuttle, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Gregory D Phillips,
Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Kristopher Knabe, BuckleySandler LLP,
Marc T G Dworsky, Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Michael E Soloff,
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Richard C St John, Munger Tolles &
Olson, Richard T Thomson, Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch,
Chartered, Thomas Jacob, Wells Fargo Law Department, Todd J Rosen,
Munger Tolles & Olson LLP & Amy L Schwartz, Lapp Libra Thomson
Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered.

Standard Pacific Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Enza G
Boderone, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene Espel
PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R. Stein,
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

National Bank of Kansas City, Defendant, represented by Nancy A
Temple, Katten & Temple LLP, Scott N Gilbert, Katten & Temple LLP
& Seth J S Leventhal, LEVENTHAL pllc.

iServe Residential Lending, LLC, Defendant, represented by Erin
Sindberg Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene
Espel PLLP, Jeanette M. Bazis, Greene Espel PLLP, Peter L Loh,
Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP & Randy D Gordon, Gardere Wynne Sewell
LLP.

Circle Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Sharon Robin
Markowitz, Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Todd A Noteboom, Stinson
Leonard Street LLP, W Anders Folk, Stinson Leonard Street LLP &
Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA.

United Fidelity Funding Corp, Defendant, represented by Michael J
Steinlage, Larson King, LLP.

DB Structured Products, Inc., Defendant, represented by Danielle
Kantor, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, David J Woll, Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Isaac M Rethy, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
LLP, Jonathan Nussbaum, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, William A
McNab, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA & William T Russell, Jr, Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP.

MortgageIT, Inc., Defendant, represented by David J Woll, Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Isaac M Rethy, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
LLP & William A McNab, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA.

CTX Mortgage Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by Benjamin E
Gurstelle, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Paul J Hemming, Briggs & Morgan,
PA. Pulte Homes, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benjamin E
Gurstelle, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Paul J Hemming, Briggs & Morgan,
PA. PulteGroup, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benjamin E
Gurstelle, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Paul J Hemming, Briggs & Morgan,
PA.

Home Loan Center, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V
Valinoti, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody,
American Mortgage Law Group.

Decision One Mortgage Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by Beth
A Stewart, Williams & Connolly LLP, Daniel J Millea, Zelle Hofmann
Voelbel & Mason LLP, Elizabeth V Kniffen, Zelle Hofmann Voelbel &
Mason LLP, Jesse T Smallwood, Williams & Connolly LLP, Matthew V
Johnson, Williams & Connolly LLP, Noorudin Mahmood Ahmad, William &
Connolly LLP & R. Hackney Wiegmann, Williams & Connolly LLP.

HSBC Finance Corporation, Defendant, represented by David J
Stagman, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Gregory S Korman, Katten
Muchin Rosenman LLP, Nicole M Moen, Fredrikson & Byron, PA, Stuart
M Richter, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP & Todd A Wind, Fredrikson &
Byron, PA.

E-Loan, Inc., Defendant, represented by Sharda R Kneen, Lindquist
& Vennum PLLP, Terrence J Fleming, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP &
Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA.

Rescue Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Christopher R
Morris, Bassford Remele, PA, Daniel R Olson, Bassford Remele, PA,
Jeffrey D. Klobucar, Bassford Remele, PA & Mark D Covin, Bassford
Remele, PA.

RBC Mortgage Company, Defendant, represented by Amanda Raines
Lawrence, BuckleySandler LLP, Brian Wegrzyn, BuckleySandler LLP,
Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, David A Schooler, Briggs &
Morgan, PA & Matthew P Previn, BuckleySandler LLP.

CMG Mortgage, Inc, Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Synovus Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Brent D Hitson,
Burr & Forman LLP, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Mark G
Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Victor L Hayslip, Burr & Forman
LLP.

Honor Bank, Defendant, represented by Garth G Gavenda, Anastasi
Jellum, PA, Lindsay W Cremona, Anastasi Jellum, P.A., Susan Jill
Rice, Alward Fisher Rice Rowe & Graf, PLC & T Christopher Stewart,
Anastasi Jellum, PA.

Primary Capital Advisors LLC, Defendant, represented by Daniel J
Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, John O'Shea Sullivan, Burr & Forman
LLP, Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Tala Amirfazli, Burr
& Forman LLP.

PHH Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by David T Schultz,
Maslon LLP, David M Souders, Weiner Brodsky Kider PC, Nicole E
Narotzky, Maslon LLP & Tessa K Somers, Weiner Brodsky Kider PC.

Global Advisory Group, Inc., Defendant, represented by Lance T
Bonner, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP.

Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by Enza G
Boderone, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene Espel
PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP & Philip R. Stein,
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Monarch Bank, Defendant, represented by Beth A Jenson Prouty,
Bassford Remele, PA.

First Mariner Bank, Defendant, represented by Joel L Perrell, Jr.,
Miles & Stockbridge P.C., Michael E Blumenfeld, Miles &Stockbridge
P.C., Nicole M Moen, Fredrikson & Byron, PA, Timothy M Hurley,
Miles & Stockbridge P.C. & Todd A Wind, Fredrikson & Byron, PA.

Equifirst Corporation, Defendant, represented by Jennifer L Olson,
Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Joshua J Fritsch, Sullivan & Cromwell
LLP & Todd A Noteboom, Stinson Leonard Street LLP.

EFC Holdings Corporation, Defendant, represented by Jennifer L
Olson, Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Joshua J Fritsch, Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP & Todd A Noteboom, Stinson Leonard Street LLP.

Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc., Counter Claimant,
represented by Navdeep Singh, Jenkins Kayayan LLP.

                        About Residential Capital

Residential Capital LLC, the unprofitable mortgage subsidiary of
Ally Financial Inc., filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 12-12020) on May 14, 2012. Neither Ally
Financial nor Ally Bank is included in the bankruptcy filings.

ResCap, one of the country's largest mortgage originators and
servicers, was sent to Chapter 11 with 50 subsidiaries amid
"continuing industry challenges, rising litigation costs and
claims, and regulatory uncertainty," according to a company
statement.

ResCap disclosed $15.7 billion in assets and $15.3 billion in
liabilities at March 31, 2012.

Centerview Partners LLC and FTI Consulting are acting as financial
advisers to ResCap.  Morrison & Foerster LLP is acting as legal
adviser to ResCap.  Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP is
the
conflicts counsel.  Rubenstein Associates, Inc., is the public
relations consultants to the Company in the Chapter 11 case.
Morrison Cohen LLP is advising ResCap's independent directors.
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLP is the claims and notice agent.

Ray C. Schrock, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York, serves
as counsel to Ally Financial.

ResCap sold most of the businesses for a combined $4.5 billion.
The
Bankruptcy Court in November 2012 approved ResCap's sale of its
mortgage servicing and origination platform assets to Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC and Walter Investment Management Corporation for $3
billion; and its portfolio of roughly 50,000 whole loans to
Berkshire Hathaway for $1.5 billion.

Judge Martin Glenn in December 2013 confirmed the Joint Chapter 11
Plan co-proposed by Residential Capital and the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.


RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: RBC Mortgage's Bid to Dismiss Suit Denied
--------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Susan Richard Nelson of the United States District
Court for the District of Minnesota denied RBC Mortgage Company's
motion to dismiss in the case, Residential Funding Company, LLC v.
RBC Mortgage Company, No. 14-cv-3093 (PJS/BRT), (D. Minn.).

The lawsuit arises out of Defendant RBC Mortgage Company's (RBC)
sale of allegedly defective mortgage loans to Residential Funding,
LLC (RFC) pursuant to a Seller Contract and Client Guide under
which RBC made many representations and warranties regarding the
loans. The acquisition dates of the loans range from March 23, 1998
to May 2, 2005.  

According to RFC, many of the loans eventually defaulted or became
delinquent and, beginning in 2008, RFC faced claims and lawsuits
resulting from defective loans it had purchased, including loans
from RBC. By May 2012, RFC had spent millions of dollars
repurchasing defective loans, including loans sold to it by RBC,
and on May 14, 2012, RFC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

RFC alleges that hundreds of proofs of claim related to allegedly
defective mortgage loans, including those sold to RFC by RBC, were
filed in connection with the bankruptcy proceedings. Accordingly,
RFC filed a lawsuit asserting two causes of action against RBC. In
Count One, a claim for breach of contract, RFC alleges that RBC
materially breached the representations and warranties it made to
RFC because the mortgage loans it sold to RFC did not comply with
those representations and warranties. RFC asserts that these
material breaches constitute Events of Default under the Agreement
and have resulted in losses and liabilities related to the
defective loans, as well as losses associated with defending the
lawsuits and proofs of claim that stem from those loans. In Count
Two, RFC alleges that it is entitled to indemnification from RBC
for those losses and liabilities.

In her Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 15, 2015 available
at http://is.gd/xRYEJOfrom Leagle.com, Judge Nelson denied
Defendant's motion to dismiss. The Court finds that RFC's breach of
contract claim against RBC is not properly dismissed as time-barred
because it does not appear from the face of the Complaint that the
limitations period has necessarily run as to any of the loans at
issue.  The Court said Minnesota's six-year statute of limitations
had not expired as to loans sold to RFC on or after May 14, 2006 at
the time RFC filed its bankruptcy petition on May 14, 2012.
Accordingly, claims based on those loans are not time-barred. It is
plausible from the face of the Complaint that the statute of
limitations for a claim based on a loan sold to RFC on or before
May 2, 2005 would not begin to run until after May 14, 2006. And,
because the date upon which RBC allegedly breached Section A201(M)
is a question of fact that goes beyond the pleadings, the Court
cannot resolve the issue at this stage of the proceedings. It is
not clear from this statement that the employees that remained
after the transfer of "substantially all" of RBC's assets and
employees in 2005 could not thereafter have discovered any breaches
with respect to the loans.

Residential Funding Company, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony
Alden -- anthonyalden@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, David Elsberg -- davidelsberg@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, David L Hashmall, Felhaber Larson,
Donald G Heeman, Felhaber Larson, Edward P Sheu --
esheu@bestlaw.com -- Best & Flanagan LLP, Erica P Taggart, Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Gabriel F Soledad --
gabrielsoledad@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, Isaac Nesser -- isaacnesser@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Jeffrey A Lipps, Carpenter Lipps &
Leland LLP, Jennifer A L Battle, Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP,
Johanna Ong -- johannaong@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Marnie E Fearon, Felhaber Larson, Matthew
R Scheck -- matthewscheck@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, Peter E. Calamari --
petercalamari@quinnemanuel.com -- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
LLP, Richard R Voelbel, Felhaber Larson, Ryan A Olson, Felhaber
Larson, Thomas G Garry -- tgarry@bestlaw.com -- Best & Flanagan
LLP, Bradley T Smith, Felhaber Larson, Jessica J Nelson, Felhaber
Larson & Daniel R Kelly, Felhaber Larson.

ResCap Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony Alden,
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Bradley T Smith, Felhaber
Larson, David Elsberg, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, David
L Hashmall, Felhaber Larson, Donald G Heeman, Felhaber Larson,
Erica P Taggart, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Gabriel F
Soledad, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Isaac Nesser, Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Jeffrey A Lipps, Carpenter Lipps &
Leland LLP, Jennifer A L Battle, Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP,
Johanna Ong, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Marnie E
Fearon, Felhaber Larson, Matthew R Scheck, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, Peter E. Calamari, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP,
Richard R Voelbel, Felhaber Larson, Ryan A Olson, Felhaber Larson,
Jessica J Nelson, Felhaber Larson & Daniel R Kelly, Felhaber
Larson.

Academy Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by David M
Souders -- souders@thewbkfirm.com -- Weiner Brodsky Kider PC, Tessa
K Somers -- somers@thewbkfirm.com -- Weiner Brodsky Kider PC,
Anthony Gabor, Oberman Thompson & Segal LLC & James L Forman --
jforman@obermanthompson.com -- Oberman Thompson, LLC.

The Mortgage Outlet, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eldon J
Spencer, Jr -- espencer@losgs.com -- Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer,
Gale & Sayre, Ltd & Stacey L Drentlaw -- sdrentlaw@losgs.com --
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd.

Ark-La-Tex Financial Services, LLC, Defendant, represented by Mark
J Carpenter -- mark@carpenter-law-firm.com -- Carpenter Law Firm
PLLC.

Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc., Defendant, represented by Eldon J
Spencer, Jr, Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd, James M
Jorissen -- jjorissen@losgs.com -- Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale
& Sayre, Ltd & Stacey L Drentlaw, Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale &
Sayre, Ltd.

Guaranty Bank, Defendant, represented by Gregory A Bromen --
gbromen@nilanjohnson.com -- Nilan Johnson Lewis PA, Matthew S.
Vignali -- mvignali@bcblaw.net -- Beck Chaet Bamberger & Polksy SC
& Steven W Jelenchick -- sjelenchick@bcblaw.net -- Beck Chaet
Bamberger & Polsky SC.

First California Mortgage Company, Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss --
cmoss@hjlawfirm.com -- Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page
Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J Robert Keena --
jkeena@hjlawfirm.com -- Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Americash, Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld, American
Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC,
Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., Evans D
Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J Robert Keena,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American Mortgage Law
Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law Group.

Broadview Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Golden Empire Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Erin
Sindberg Porter -- esindbergporter@greeneespel.com -- Greene Espel
PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble -- jkimble@greeneespel.com – Greene
Espel PLLP, Jenny Gassman Pines -- jgassman-pines@greeneespel.com
-- Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R. Stein -- pstein@bilzin.com --
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona --
ssakona@bilzin.com -- Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Community West Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Christina
Rieck Loukas -- cloukas@winthrop.com -- Winthrop & Weinstine, PA,
Christopher A Camardello -- ccamardello@winthrop.com -- Winthrop &
Weinstine, PA, Jeffrey R Ansel -- jansel@winthrop.com -- Winthrop &
Weinstine, PA & Michael A Rosow -- mrosow@winthrop.com -- Winthrop
& Weinstine, PA.

Fremont Bank, Defendant, represented by Eldon J Spencer, Jr,
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd, James M Jorissen,
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd & Stacey L Drentlaw,
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre, Ltd.

First Equity Mortgage Bankers, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Amelia R Selvig -- aselvig@anthonyostlund.com -- Anthony Ostlund
Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D Anthony -- banthony@anthonyostlund.com
-- Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Joseph W Anthony --
janthony@anthonyostlund.com -- Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA,
Philip R. Stein, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia
M Sakona, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Colonial Savings, F.A., Defendant, represented by Daniel N Moak --
dmoak@briggs.com -- Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla --
dsupalla@briggs.com -- Briggs & Morgan, PA & Mark G Schroeder --
mschroeder@briggs.com -- Briggs & Morgan, PA.

First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by
Kevin J Dunlevy, Beisel & Dunlevy, PA & Michael E Kreun, Beisel &
Dunlevy, PA.

Central Pacific Homeloans, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Central Pacific Bank, Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J
Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American
Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law
Group.

Central Pacific Financial Corp., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Provident Funding Associates, L.P., Defendant, represented by
Daniel N Moak, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs &
Morgan, PA, Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Neil R
O'Hanlon, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

First Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by Gene A Hoff,
Minenko & Hoff & Michael J Minenko, Minenko & Hoff, P.A..

Mortgage Network, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Mortgage Capital Associates, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Amelia R Selvig, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D
Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Joseph W Anthony,
Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Philip R. Stein, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Lenox Financial Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Gina L
Albertson, Albertson Law & Michael D O'Neill, Martin & Squires,
P.A..

E Trade Bank, Defendant, represented by Amelia R Selvig, Anthony
Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer
& Louwagie PA, Joseph W Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie
PA, Philip R. Stein, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP &
Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, Defendant, represented by Amelia
R Selvig, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Amy Y Cho, Shook,
Hardy & Bacon LLP, Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer &
Louwagie PA & Michael P Conway, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP.

PNC Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Adam M Gogolak, Wachtell,
Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Amanda Raines Lawrence, BuckleySandler LLP,
Brett J Natarelli, BuckleySandler LLP, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs &
Morgan, PA, David A Schooler, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Elaine P Golin,
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Fredrick S Levin, BuckleySandler
LLP, Jonathan M Moses, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Justin V
Rodriguez, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Mark G Schroeder, Briggs
& Morgan, PA & Richard E Gottlieb, BuckleySandler LLP.

Mortgage Access Corp., Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J Robert
Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law Group.

Cornerstone Home Lending, Inc., Defendant, represented by Alan H
Maclin, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA
& Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA.

Impac Funding Corporation, Defendant, represented by Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP,
Katherine M. Swenson, Greene Espel PLLP & Janine Wetzel Kimble,
Greene Espel PLLP.

Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Amelia R
Selvig, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Brooke D Anthony,
Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA & Joseph W Anthony, Anthony
Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA.

Hometown Mortgage Services, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group & Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer &
Louwagie PA.

Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Amy L Schwartz, Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered,
Jonathan M Jenkins, JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP, Lara Kayayan, Jenkins
LLP, Navdeep Singh, Jenkins Kayayan LLP & Richard T Thomson, Lapp
Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered.

Wallick & Volk, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J
Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American
Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law
Group.

Branch Banking & Trust Co., Defendant, represented by Jason D
Evans, McGuire Woods LLP, Kelly G Laudon, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP,
Mark A Jacobson, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP, T Richmond McPherson,
III, McGuire Woods LLP & William C Mayberry, Mcguire Woods LLP.

T.J. Financial, Inc., Defendant, represented by Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene Espel PLLP,
Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R. Stein, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin Sumberg
Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Stearns Lending, LLC, Defendant, represented by Alan H Maclin,
Briggs & Morgan, PA, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Mark
G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA.

Terrace Mortgage Company, Defendant, represented by Aaron P M
Tady, Coles Barton LLP, C J Schoenwetter, Bowman & Brooke LLP,
John D Sear, Bowman & Brooke LLP, Thomas M Barton, Coles Barton
LLP & Rachelle A Velgersdyk, Bowman & Brooke LLP.

Gateway Bank, F.S.B., Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., Evans D Prieston, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C., J
Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti, American
Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American Mortgage Law
Group.

Universal American Mortgage Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by
Enza G Boderone, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Erin
Sindberg Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene
Espel PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R.
Stein, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona,
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Amy L Schwartz,
Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered, Eric P Tuttle,
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Gregory D Phillips, Munger, Tolles &
Olson, LLP, Marc T G Dworsky, Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Michael
E Soloff, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Richard C St John, Munger
Tolles & Olson, Richard T Thomson, Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner &
Pusch, Chartered, Thomas Jacob, Wells Fargo Law Department & Todd J
Rosen, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP.

BMO Harris Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Amanda Raines
Lawrence, BuckleySandler LLP, Brett J Natarelli, BuckleySandler
LLP, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, David A Schooler,
Briggs & Morgan, PA, Fredrick S Levin, BuckleySandler LLP,
Kristopher Knabe, BuckleySandler LLP & Richard E Gottlieb,
BuckleySandler LLP.

Wells Fargo Financial Retail Credit, Inc., Defendant, represented
by Eric P Tuttle, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Gregory D Phillips,
Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Kristopher Knabe, BuckleySandler LLP,
Marc T G Dworsky, Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Michael E Soloff,
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Richard C St John, Munger Tolles &
Olson, Richard T Thomson, Lapp Libra Thomson Stoebner & Pusch,
Chartered, Thomas Jacob, Wells Fargo Law Department, Todd J Rosen,
Munger Tolles & Olson LLP & Amy L Schwartz, Lapp Libra Thomson
Stoebner & Pusch, Chartered.

Standard Pacific Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Enza G
Boderone, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene Espel PLLP,
Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP, Philip R. Stein, Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP & Shalia M Sakona, Bilzin Sumberg
Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

National Bank of Kansas City, Defendant, represented by Nancy A
Temple, Katten & Temple LLP, Scott N Gilbert, Katten & Temple LLP
& Seth J S Leventhal, LEVENTHAL pllc.

iServe Residential Lending, LLC, Defendant, represented by Erin
Sindberg Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene
Espel PLLP, Jeanette M. Bazis, Greene Espel PLLP, Peter L Loh,
Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP & Randy D Gordon, Gardere Wynne Sewell
LLP.

Circle Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Sharon Robin
Markowitz, Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Todd A Noteboom, Stinson
Leonard Street LLP, W Anders Folk, Stinson Leonard Street LLP &
Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA.

United Fidelity Funding Corp, Defendant, represented by Michael J
Steinlage, Larson King, LLP.

DB Structured Products, Inc., Defendant, represented by Danielle
Kantor, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, David J Woll, Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Isaac M Rethy, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
LLP, Jonathan Nussbaum, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, William A
McNab, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA & William T Russell, Jr, Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP.

MortgageIT, Inc., Defendant, represented by David J Woll, Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Isaac M Rethy, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
LLP & William A McNab, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA.

CTX Mortgage Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by Benjamin E
Gurstelle, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Paul J Hemming, Briggs & Morgan,
PA. Pulte Homes, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benjamin E
Gurstelle, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Paul J Hemming, Briggs & Morgan,
PA. PulteGroup, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benjamin E
Gurstelle, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Paul J Hemming, Briggs & Morgan,
PA.

Home Loan Center, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew
Steinfeld, American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss,
Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage
Law Group, P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V
Valinoti, American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody,
American Mortgage Law Group.

Decision One Mortgage Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by Beth
Stewart, Williams & Connolly LLP, Daniel J Millea, Zelle Hofmann
Voelbel & Mason LLP, Elizabeth V Kniffen, Zelle Hofmann Voelbel &
Mason LLP, Jesse T Smallwood, Williams & Connolly LLP, Matthew V
Johnson, Williams & Connolly LLP, Noorudin Mahmood Ahmad, Williams
& Connolly LLP & R. Hackney Wiegmann, Williams & Connolly LLP.

HSBC Finance Corporation, Defendant, represented by David J
Stagman, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Gregory S Korman, Katten
Muchin Rosenman LLP, Nicole M Moen, Fredrikson & Byron, PA, Stuart
M Richter, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP & Todd A Wind, Fredrikson &
Byron, PA.

E-Loan, Inc., Defendant, represented by Sharda R Kneen, Lindquist
& Vennum PLLP, Terrence J Fleming, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP &
Brooke D Anthony, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA.

Rescue Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, represented by Christopher R
Morris, Bassford Remele, PA, Daniel R Olson, Bassford Remele, PA,
Jeffrey D. Klobucar, Bassford Remele, PA & Mark D Covin, Bassford
Remele, PA.

RBC Mortgage Company, Defendant, represented by Amanda Raines
Lawrence, BuckleySandler LLP, Brian Wegrzyn, BuckleySandler LLP,
Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, David A Schooler, Briggs &
Morgan, PA & Matthew P Previn, BuckleySandler LLP.

CMG Mortgage, Inc, Defendant, represented by Andrew Steinfeld,
American Morgage Law Group, P.C., Carol R M Moss, Hellmuth &
Johnson PLLC, Edward Page Allinson, American Mortgage Law Group,
P.C., J Robert Keena, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Jack V Valinoti,
American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. & James W. Brody, American
Mortgage Law Group.

Synovus Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Brent D Hitson,
Burr & Forman LLP, Daniel J Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Mark G
Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Victor L Hayslip, Burr & Forman
LLP.

Honor Bank, Defendant, represented by Garth G Gavenda, Anastasi
Jellum, PA, Lindsay W Cremona, Anastasi Jellum, P.A., Susan Jill
Rice, Alward Fisher Rice Rowe & Graf, PLC & T Christopher Stewart,
Anastasi Jellum, PA.

Primary Capital Advisors LLC, Defendant, represented by Daniel J
Supalla, Briggs & Morgan, PA, John O'Shea Sullivan, Burr & Forman
LLP, Mark G Schroeder, Briggs & Morgan, PA & Tala Amirfazli, Burr
& Forman LLP.

PHH Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by David T Schultz,
Maslon LLP, David M Souders, Weiner Brodsky Kider PC, Nicole E
Narotzky, Maslon LLP & Tessa K Somers, Weiner Brodsky Kider PC.

Global Advisory Group, Inc., Defendant, represented by Lance T
Bonner, Lindquist & Vennum PLLP.

Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by Enza G
Boderone, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Erin Sindberg
Porter, Greene Espel PLLP, Janine Wetzel Kimble, Greene Espel
PLLP, Jenny Gassman-Pines, Greene Espel PLLP & Philip R. Stein,
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP.

Monarch Bank, Defendant, represented by Beth A Jenson Prouty,
Bassford Remele, PA.

First Mariner Bank, Defendant, represented by Joel L Perrell, Jr.,
Miles & Stockbridge P.C., Michael E Blumenfeld, Miles &Stockbridge
P.C., Nicole M Moen, Fredrikson & Byron, PA, Timothy M Hurley,
Miles & Stockbridge P.C. & Todd A Wind, Fredrikson & Byron, PA.

Equifirst Corporation, Defendant, represented by Jennifer L Olson,
Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Joshua J Fritsch, Sullivan & Cromwell
LLP & Todd A Noteboom, Stinson Leonard Street LLP.

EFC Holdings Corporation, Defendant, represented by Jennifer L
Olson, Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Joshua J Fritsch, Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP & Todd A Noteboom, Stinson Leonard Street LLP.

Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc., Counter Claimant,
represented by Navdeep Singh, Jenkins Kayayan LLP.


ROBERT J. MEIER: Ex-Wife's Priority Claim Allowed
-------------------------------------------------
In the bankruptcy case of Robert J. Meier, Bankruptcy Judge Jack B.
Schmetter overruled Edward Shrock's objection and allowed Martha
Maggiore's (formerly, Martha Meier) priority claim.

After the conversion to Chapter 7 of Robert Meier's bankruptcy
case, Martha Maggiore amended her proof of claim to add a priority
unsecured claim for missed domestic support payments while Meier's
case was in Chapter 11.

Another creditor, Edward Shrock, argued that Maggiore's claim
should be characterized as property division, not support.

Judge Schmetter rejected Shrock's argument. He found Shrock to be
judicially estopped because his argument contradicts his previous
position that Maggiore's claim was for support. Judge Schmetter
concluded that Maggiore is entitled to a priority under 11 U.S.C.
Section 507(a)(1)(A).

A copy of the June 26, 2015 memorandum opinion is available at
http://is.gd/oor1hPfrom Leagle.com.

Robert J. Meier is the CEO and owner of a 7/8 interest in Baby
Supermall, LLC.  One of his creditors, Edward Shrock, was a founder
of the Company, and holds a 1/8 interest.  The Company sells infant
bedding, clothing and other accessories online. The parties have
been embroiled in state court litigation in the Circuit Court of
Cook County, in a case styled Shrock v. Meier, 09 L 1455.

Shrock sought a judgment against Meier for breach of his fiduciary
duty, and the dissolution of the Company. On March 5, 2014, a jury
returned a verdict against Meier finding that Meier violated his
fiduciary duties to Shrock.

Before judgment was entered on the verdict, Meier filed a petition
for relief under Chapter 11 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 14-10105).
Shrock then sought, and obtained, relief from the automatic stay to
continue the litigation in state court.

Meier's case was later converted to Chapter 7 bankruptcy.


ROVER TECHNOLOGIES: Objection to Final Decree Motion Sustained
--------------------------------------------------------------
Within four months after achieving confirmation of its Chapter 11
plan, Rover Technologies, LLC, filed what appeared to be a routine
motion for entry of a final decree, based on the allegation that
the plan had been substantially consummated.  The motion also
represented that the plan payments had been "completely funded by
one of the holders of an equity interest in the Debtor, Gregory
Matton . . . who now holds 100% of the equity . . . ."  Another
member of the Debtor, Bryan Kearney, objected to the motion,
arguing that Matton had paid creditors and extinguished the
interests of the other seven equity holders without proper notice.
The motive behind the action, Kearney alleges, is to insulate
another company owned solely by Matton, Apex Data Solutions, LLC,
from liability for taking the Debtor's technology and business.

The only issue before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, however, is whether the
plan was implemented unfairly to squeeze out the other equity
holders.  U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert May concludes that the
equity holders, including Kearney, did not receive sufficient
notice of the amount, timing and procedure for making the capital
contributions required to retain their interests.  Accordingly,
there has been no forfeiture.  The Court will direct the Debtor to
engage disinterested special counsel to devise and implement a
solicitation of capital contributions from all of the equity
holders, pro rata, in the percentages stated in the court-approved
disclosure statement.

Accordingly, Judge May declares void the forfeiture of stock of any
member who failed to make a contribution of capital by March 31,
2014, and sustained, in part, the Objection to Debtor's Motion for
Final Decree filed by Kearney.

The bankruptcy case is In re Rover Technologies, LLC, Chapter 11,
Debtor, Case No. 8:13-BK-13355-KRM, (Bankr. M.D. Fla.).

A full-text of Judge Rodney May's Memorandum Opinion and Order
dated July 10, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/uoJHiifrom
Leagle.com.


SABINE OIL: Court Permits Interim Use of Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------
Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation and its affiliated debtors sought and
obtained from Judge Shelley C. Chapman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York interim authority to use cash
collateral securing their prepetition indebtedness from Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent under the First
Lien Credit Agreement; and Wilmington Trust, National Association,
as Administrative Agent under the Second Lien Credit Agreement.

Jonathan S. Henes, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York, New
York, tells the Court that the Debtors, the first lien agent, and
the second lien agent have reached an agreement providing the
Debtors with the consensual use of the cash collateral and the
disputed cash, providing the Debtors with the liquidity necessary
to continue operations and fund the chapter 11 cases.  Mr. Henes
further tells the Court that in exchange for consensual access to
the cash collateral and the disputed cash, the Debtors have agreed
to provide certain forms of adequate protection to the prepetition
secured parties and to make disbursements.  

The final hearing on the Motion is scheduled for August 10, 2015 at
10:00 am.  The deadline for the filing of objections is August 3.

Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation and its affiliated debtors are
represented by:

          Paul M. Basta, Esq.
          Jonathan S. Henes, Esq.
          Christopher Marcus, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          601 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212)446-4800
          Facsimile: (212)446-4900
          Email: paul.basta@kirkland.com
                 jonathan.henes@kirkland.com
                 christopher.marcus@kirkland.com

             -- and --

          James H.M. Sprayregen, Esq.
          Ryan Blaine Bennet, Esq.
          Brad Weiland, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          300 North LaSalle Street
          Chicago, Illinois 60654
          Telephone: (312)862-2000
          Facsimile: (312)862-2200
          Email: james.sprayregen@kirkland.com   
                 ryan.bennett@kirkland.com
                 brad.weiland@kirkland.com

                       About Sabine Oil & Gas

Sabine Oil & Gas Corp. is an independent energy company engaged in
the acquisition, production, exploration, and development of
onshore oil and natural gas properties in the U.S.  The Company's
current operations are principally located in the Cotton Valley
Sand and Haynesville Shale in East Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale in
South Texas, the Granite Wash in the Texas Panhandle, and the
North Louisiana Haynesville.  The Company operates, or has joint
working interests in, approximately 2,100 oil and gas production
sites (approximately 1,800 operating and approximately 315
non-operating) and has approximately 165 full-time employees.

Sabine Oil and its affiliated entities sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 15-11835) in Manhattan on July 15,
2015.

The Debtors have engaged Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP, as counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, as
investment banker, and Prime Clerk LLC as notice, claims and
balloting agent.  The Debtors also tapped Zolfo Cooper Management,
LLC, to provide Jonathan A. Mitchell as CRO and other additional
personnel.


SABINE OIL: Has Interim Authority to Pay $18.5MM in Royalties
-------------------------------------------------------------
Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation and its affiliated debtors sought and
obtained from Judge Shelley C. Chapman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York interim authority to pay
working interest disbursements and royalties.

Jonathan S. Henes, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York,
estimates that the Debtors have approximately $23.5 million of
Working Interest Disbursements outstanding and approximately $56.5
million in as-yet unpaid Royalty Payments, including approximately
$18.5 million in payments.

The Debtors seek authority to remit up to $10.5 million of the
Working Interest Disbursements and up to $18.5 million in
prepetition Royalty Payments on an interim basis, pending entry of
the Final Order, and to continue remitting the Working Interest
Disbursements and making such Royalty Payments, in the ordinary
course of business.

Mr. Henes asserts that because the Royalty Interests and Working
Interest Disbursements are not property of the estate either by
application of state law or the Bankruptcy Code, any proceeds or
profits that the Debtors may take possession of during the pendency
of the Chapter 11 cases earned on their account are not property of
the estate.

The final hearing to consider approval of the Motion is scheduled
on August 10, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.  The deadline for the filing of
objections is August 3.

Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation and its affiliated debtors are
represented by:

          Paul M. Basta, Esq.
          Jonathan S. Henes, Esq.
          Christopher Marcus, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          601 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212)446-4800
          Facsimile: (212)446-4900
          Email: paul.basta@kirkland.com
                 jonathan.henes@kirkland.com
                 christopher.marcus@kirkland.com

             -- and --

          James H.M. Sprayregen, Esq.
          Ryan Blaine Bennet, Esq.
          Brad Weiland, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          300 North LaSalle Street
          Chicago, Illinois 60654
          Telephone: (312)862-2000
          Facsimile: (312)862-2200
          Email: james.sprayregen@kirkland.com   
                 ryan.bennett@kirkland.com
                 brad.weiland@kirkland.com

                      About Sabine Oil

Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation -- http://www.sabineoil.com-- is an
independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, production,
exploration and development of onshore oil and natural gas
properties in the United States.  Sabine's current operations are
principally located in the Cotton Valley Sand and Haynesville Shale
in East Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, the Granite
Wash in the Texas Panhandle and the North Louisiana Haynesville.


SABINE OIL: Hires Prime Clerk as Claims and Noticing Agent
----------------------------------------------------------
Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation, et al., seek authorization from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
employ Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent, nunc pro tunc
to the July 15, 2015 petition date.

The Debtors require Prime Clerk to:

   (a) assist with, among other things, solicitation, balloting,
       and tabulation of votes, and prepare any related reports,
       as required in support of confirmation of a chapter 11
       plan, and in connection with such services, process
       requests for documents from parties in interest, including,

       if applicable, brokerage firms, bank back-offices, and
       institutional holders;

   (b) prepare an official ballot certification and, if necessary,

       testify in support of the ballot tabulation results;

   (c) assist with the preparation of the Debtors' schedules of
       assets and liabilities and statements of financial affairs
       and gather data in conjunction therewith;

   (d) provide a confidential data room, if requested;

   (e) manage and coordinate any distributions pursuant to a
       chapter 11 plan; and

   (f) provide such other processing, solicitation, balloting, and

       other administrative services described in the Engagement
       Agreement, but not included in the Section 156(c)
       Application, as may be requested from time to time by the
       Debtors, the Court, or the Office of the Clerk of the
       Bankruptcy Court (the "Clerk").

Prime Clerk will be paid at these hourly rates:

       Analyst                        $35-$50
       Technology Consultant          $80-$120
       Consultant                     $95-$145
       Senior Consultant              $150-$170
       Director                       $180-$195
       Solicitation Consultant        $195
       Director of Solicitation       $220

Prime Clerk will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Michael J. Frishberg, co-president and chief operating officer of
Prime Clerk, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and
their estates.

Prime Clerk can be reached at:

       Shai Waisman
       PRIME CLERK LLC
       830 3rd Avenue, 9th Floor
       New York, NY 10022
       Tel: (212) 257-5450
       E-mail: swaisman@primeclerk.com

                       About Sabine Oil & Gas

Sabine Oil & Gas Corp. is an independent energy company engaged in
the acquisition, production, exploration, and development of
onshore oil and natural gas properties in the U.S.  The Company's
current operations are principally located in the Cotton Valley
Sand and Haynesville Shale in East Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale in
South Texas, the Granite Wash in the Texas Panhandle, and the North
Louisiana Haynesville.  The Company operates, or has joint working
interests in, approximately 2,100 oil and gas production sites
(approximately 1,800 operating and approximately 315 non-operating)
and has approximately 165 full-time employees.

Sabine Oil and its affiliated entities sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 15-11835) in Manhattan on July 15,
2015.

The Debtors have engaged Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP, as counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, as
investment banker, and Prime Clerk LLC as notice, claims and
balloting agent.  The Debtors also tapped Zolfo Cooper Management,
LLC, to provide Jonathan A. Mitchell as CRO and other additional
personnel.


SABINE OIL: Meeting to Form Creditors' Panel Set for July 28
------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Trustee for Region 2 will hold an organizational
meeting on July 28, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in the bankruptcy case of
Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation, et al.

The meeting will be held at:

         Waldorf Astoria
         301 Park Avenue
         4th Floor
         New York, NY 10022

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee. Section 1103 of the
Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may consult with the
debtor, investigate the debtor and its business operations and
participate in the formulation of a plan of reorganization.  The
Committee may also perform other services as are in the interests
of the unsecured creditors whom it represents.


SABINE OIL: Seeks Approval of Lease Decision Procedure
------------------------------------------------------
Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation and its affiliated debtors ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
approve procedures governing the rejection or assumption of
executory contracts and unexpired leases.

The proposed rejection procedures contain, among others, the
following terms:

   (a) Rejection Notice.  The Debtors will file a notice to reject
a Contract or Contracts pursuant to Section 365 of the Bankruptcy
Code, which Rejection Notice will set forth, among other things:
(i) the Contract(s) to be rejected; (ii) the names and addresses of
the counterparties to such Contract(s); (iii) the effective date of
the rejection for each such Contract, which date may not be before
the date of service of the Rejection Notice; (iv) if such Contract
is a lease, the personal property to be abandoned, if any, and an
estimate of the book value of such property; and (v) the deadlines
and procedures for filing objections to the Rejection Notice. The
Rejection Notice may list multiple Contracts; provided that the
number of counterparties to Contracts listed on the Rejection
Notice will be limited to no more than 100.

   (b) No Objection.  If no objection to the rejection of any
Contract is timely filed, each Contract will be rejected as of the
Rejection Date set forth in the Rejection Notice or such other date
as the Debtors and the counterparty or counterparties to such
Contract(s) agree.

   (c) Unresolved Objections. If an objection to the rejection of
any Contract(s) is timely filed and not withdrawn or resolved, the
Debtors will file a notice for a hearing to consider the objection
for the Contract(s) to which such objection relates.  If such
objection is overruled or withdrawn, such Contract(s) will be
rejected as of the Rejection Date set forth in the Rejection Notice
or such other date as the Debtors and the counterparty or
counterparties to such Contract(s) agree.

   (d) No Application of Security Deposits. If the Debtors have
deposited monies with a Contract counterparty as a security deposit
or other arrangement, such Contract counterparty may not setoff,
recoup, or otherwise use such monies without further order of the
Court, unless the Debtors and the counterparty or counterparties to
such Contract(s) otherwise agree.

   (e) Abandoned Property. The Debtors seek authority to remove or
abandon any of their personal property that may be located on the
Debtors' leased premises that are subject to a rejected Contract.
The Debtors will generally describe the abandoned personal property
in the Rejection Notice.  Absent a timely objection, the property
will be deemed abandoned pursuant to section 554 of the Bankruptcy
Code, as is, effective as of the Rejection Date.

   (f) Rejection Damages.  Claims arising out of the rejection of
Contracts, if any, must be filed on or before the later of (i) the
deadline for filing proofs of claim established in these chapter 11
cases, and (ii) 30 days after the Rejection Date.  If no proof of
claim is timely filed, the claimant will be forever barred from
asserting a claim for damages arising from the rejection and from
participating in any distributions on such a claim that may be made
in connection with these chapter 11 cases.

The proposed assumption procedures contain, among others, the
following terms:

   (a) Assumption Notice.  The Debtors will file a notice to assume
a Contract or Contracts pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy
Code, which will set forth, among other things: (i) the Contract(s)
to be assumed; (ii) the names and addresses of the counterparties
to such Contract(s); (iii) the identity of the proposed assignee of
such Contracts, if applicable; (iv)the effective date of the
assumption for each such Contract(s), which date may not be before
the date of service of the Assumption Notice; (v) the proposed cure
amount, if any; (vi) a description of any material amendments to
the Contract made outside of the ordinary course of business, if
any; and (vii) the deadlines and procedures for filing objections
to the Assumption Notice. The Assumption Notice may list multiple
Contracts; provided that the number of counterparties to Contracts
listed on the Assumption Notice will be limited to no more than
100.

   (b) Objection Procedures. Parties objecting to a proposed
assumption must file and serve a written objection so that such
objection is filed with the Court and actually received by the
Objection Service Parties no later than 14 days after the date the
Debtors serve the relevant Assumption Notice.

   (c) No Objection. If no objection to the assumption of any
Contract is timely filed, each Contract will be assumed as of the
Assumption Date set forth in the Assumption Notice or such other
date as the Debtors and the counterparty or counterparties to such
Contract(s) agree.

   (d) Unresolved Objections. If an objection to the assumption of
any Contract(s) is timely filed and not withdrawn or resolved, the
Debtors will file a notice for a hearing to consider the objection
for the Contract(s) to which such objection relates. If such
objection is overruled or withdrawn, such Contract(s) shall be
assumed as of the Assumption Date set forth in the Assumption
Notice or such other date as the Debtors and the counterparty or
counterparties to such Contract(s) agree.

Jonathan S. Henes, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York,
tells the Court that the Debtors are in the process of evaluating
all of their contracts to determine whether they should be: (a)
rejected as unfavorable to the debtors, or (b) assumed or assumed
and assigned, including the contracts to be assumed as amended
through consensual negotiations with the relevant counterparties.
Mr. Henes asserts that without the relief requested by the debtors,
they would be required to file separate motions to reject or assume
individual contracts, resulting in the incurrence of substantial
costs and administrative burdens.

Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation and its affiliated debtors are
represented by:

          Paul M. Basta, Esq.
          Jonathan S. Henes, Esq.
          Christopher Marcus, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          601 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212)446-4800
          Facsimile: (212)446-4900
          Email: paul.basta@kirkland.com
                 jonathan.henes@kirkland.com
                 christopher.marcus@kirkland.com

            -- and --

          James H.M. Sprayregen, Esq.
          Ryan Blaine Bennet, Esq.
          Brad Weiland, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          300 North LaSalle Street
          Chicago, Illinois 60654
          Telephone: (312)862-2000
          Facsimile: (312)862-2200
          Email: james.sprayregen@kirkland.com   
                 ryan.bennett@kirkland.com
                 brad.weiland@kirkland.com

                      About Sabine Oil

Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation -- http://www.sabineoil.com-- is an
independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, production,
exploration and development of onshore oil and natural gas
properties in the United States.  Sabine's current operations are
principally located in the Cotton Valley Sand and Haynesville Shale
in East Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, the Granite
Wash in the Texas Panhandle and the North Louisiana Haynesville.



SABINE OIL: Seeks to Reject Nabors Drilling, et al., Leases
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation and its affiliated debtors seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of New York to reject the following contracts and related
agreements:

   (a) Nabors Drilling Rig Contracts.  Sabine is party to three
daywork drilling contracts with Nabors Drilling USA, LP, dated as
of December 14, 2012, for the provision and use of three drilling
rigs and related services.  The Debtors have determined that it is
no longer necessary or desirable to maintain the Drilling Rig
Contracts because they no longer intend to use the X-Rigs.  The
Debtors estimate that rejection of the Drilling Rig Contracts will
save the Debtors approximately $30.8 million over the life of the
Contracts.

   (b) Nabors Oilfield Services Agreement.  Sabine is party to a
committed oilfield services agreement with Nabors Industries, Inc.,
dated as of December 13, 2012, for the provision of drilling and
hydraulic fracturing services.  The Debtors have determined that it
is no longer necessary or desirable to maintain the Nabors Oilfield
Services Agreement given that the Nabors Oilfield Services
Agreement requires the Debtors to either obtain services
exclusively from Nabors Industries or pay a fee, and the Debtors
can secure the same or similar services in the market at lower
rates.

   (c) Leaseback Contracts.  Sabine is party to sale and leaseback
arrangements for certain drilling equipment under a Master Lease
Agreement with LaSalle National Leasing Corporation, dated as of
August 2, 2007.  The current counterparty with respect to two of
these sale and leaseback arrangements is The Fifth Third Equipment
Finance Company.  The current counterparty with respect to another
of these sale and leaseback arrangements is Bank of America Leasing
& Capital LLC.  The Debtors have determined that it is no longer
necessary or desirable to maintain the Leaseback Contracts given
that they no longer intend to use the equipment leased thereunder.

   (d) Printer Leases.  Sabine is party to an agreement for the
lease of certain printers with Lewan & Associates, Inc., dated as
of November 21, 2012.  Additionally, Sabine entered into another
agreement for the lease of certain printers with Lewan dated as of
May 28, 2013.  The Debtors have determined that it is no longer
necessary or desirable to maintain the Lewan Printer Leases given
that they no longer intend to use the printers leased thereunder.
The Debtors estimate that rejection of the Lewan Printer Leases
will save the Debtors approximately $141,000 over the life of the
Contracts.

   (e) KMI Software Agreement.  Sabine is party to a software
subscription agreement with Knowledge Management Innovations, Ltd.,
dated as of February 5, 2014, for the use of certain software. The
Debtors have determined that it is no longer necessary or desirable
to maintain the KMI Software Agreement given that they no longer
intend to use the KMI Software.  The Debtors estimate that
rejection of the KMI Software Agreement will save the Debtors
approximately $75,000 over the life of the Contract.

   (f) IHS Software Agreement.  Sabine is party to a software
subscription agreement with IHS Global Inc., dated as of June 24,
2013, for the use of certain software.  The Debtors have determined
that it is no longer necessary or desirable to maintain the IHS
Software Agreement given that they no longer intend to use the IHS
Software.  The Debtors estimate that rejection of the IHS Software
Agreement will save the Debtors approximately $150,000 over the
life of the Contract.

   (g) eVIN Software Licensing Agreement.  Sabine is party to a
software licensing agreement with Merrick Systems, Inc., dated as
of August 2, 2004, for the licensing and use of certain software.
The Debtors have determined that it is no longer necessary or
desirable to maintain the Merrick Software Licensing Agreement
given that they no longer use the eVIN Software.  The Debtors
estimate that rejection of the Merrick Software Licensing Agreement
will save the Debtors approximately $136,000 over the life of the
Contract.

Jonathan S. Henes, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York,
believes that rejection of the contracts is well within the
Debtors' business judgment and is in the best interest of their
estates.  Mr. Henes tells the Court that absent rejection, the
contracts impose ongoing obligations on the debtors and their
estates that constitute an unnecessary drain on the debtors'
resources compared to any associated benefits.  He adds that
non-debtor parties under the Contracts will not be unduly
prejudiced if the rejection is deemed effective as of the Petition
Date.  He asserts that without a retroactive date of rejection, the
debtors will be forced to incur unnecessary administrative expenses
for the contracts that provide no benefit to their estates.

Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation and its affiliated debtors are
represented by:

          Paul M. Basta, Esq.
          Jonathan S. Henes, Esq.
          Christopher Marcus, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          601 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212)446-4800
          Facsimile: (212)446-4900
          Email: paul.basta@kirkland.com
                 jonathan.henes@kirkland.com
                 christopher.marcus@kirkland.com

             -- and --

          James H.M. Sprayregen, Esq.
          Ryan Blaine Bennet, Esq.
          Brad Weiland, Esq.
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
          KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
          300 North LaSalle Street
          Chicago, Illinois 60654
          Telephone: (312)862-2000
          Facsimile: (312)862-2200
          Email: james.sprayregen@kirkland.com   
                 ryan.bennett@kirkland.com
                 brad.weiland@kirkland.com

                      About Sabine Oil

Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation -- http://www.sabineoil.com-- is an
independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, production,
exploration and development of onshore oil and natural gas
properties in the United States.  Sabine's current operations are
principally located in the Cotton Valley Sand and Haynesville Shale
in East Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, the Granite
Wash in the Texas Panhandle and the North Louisiana Haynesville.


SABINE OIL: Zolfo Cooper's Jonathan Mitchell to Serve as CRO
------------------------------------------------------------
Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation, et al., seek authorization from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
employ Zolfo Cooper Management, LLC to provide Jonathan A. Mitchell
as chief restructuring officer and additional personnel, nunc pro
tunc to the July 15, 2015 petition date.

On July 10, 2015, the Debtors entered into the Services Agreement
with Zolfo Cooper to:

   (a) appoint Mr. Mitchell to serve as CRO;
   
   (b) provide the Debtors with three additional restructuring
       associates; and

   (c) provide the Debtors with a separate team of litigation   
       support professionals, including a director of
       investigative services (the "Associate Director of   
       Investigation"), to provide services related to the
       Potential Claims Investigation.

Pursuant to the terms of the Services Agreement, Mr. Mitchell will
serve as the Debtors' CRO and Zolfo Cooper will assign Associate
Directors to perform other services as needed pursuant to the
Services Agreement. Mr. Mitchell primarily will perform the
functions relating to coordination, communication, negotiation,
cash flow projections, the business plan, long-term capital
restructuring, and contingency planning.

The Associate Director of Investigation will be assigned to lead
the litigation support services in connection with the Potential
Claims Investigation.  The Associate Director of Investigation will
work closely with Counsel and shall report to the independent
investigation committee of the Board.

Zolfo Cooper will be paid by the Debtors for the services of Mr.
Mitchell and the Associate Directors in accordance with the
Services Agreement, which provides in relevant part as follows:

   (a) Standard Hourly Rates: Fees for services provided will be
       based on the hours charged at Zolfo Cooper's standard
       hourly rates that are in effect when the services are
       rendered, which rates generally are revised semi-annually.
       The billing rates for professionals who may be assigned to
       this engagement in effect as of Jan. 1, 2015, are as
       follows:

         Managing Directors         $775-$925
         Professional Staff         $265-$770
         Support Personnel          $60-$310

   (b) Out-of-Pocket Expenses: Zolfo Cooper shall be reimbursed
       for Zolfo Cooper's, Mr. Mitchell's, and Associate
       Directors' reasonable and documented out-of-pocket
       expenses including, but not limited to, costs of travel,
       reproduction, the reasonable and documented fees of one law

       firm serving as counsel, if any, retained by Zolfo Cooper,  

       any applicable state sale or excise tax, and other direct
       expenses.

   (c) Retainer and Advance Payments: Zolfo Cooper received a pre-
       petition retainer of $250,000 and advance payments of
       $2,390,000. Prior to the Petition Date, and after
       application of the advance payment, Zolfo Cooper drew down
       on the retainer to cover all outstanding prepetition fees
       and expenses. Zolfo Cooper will apply its remaining
       retainer and/or advance payment balance to allowed
       post-petition fees and expenses prior to seeking payment
       from the Debtors.

Jonathan A. Mitchell, senior managing director of Zolfo Cooper,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

Zolfo Cooper can be reached at:

       Elizabeth S. Kardos, Esq.
       ZOLFO COOPER MANAGEMENT, LLC
       101 Eisenhower Parkway, 3rd Floor
       Roseland, NJ 07068
       Tel: (212) 561-4120
       E-mail: ekardos@zolfocooper.com

                       About Sabine Oil & Gas

Sabine Oil & Gas Corp. is an independent energy company engaged in
the acquisition, production, exploration, and development of
onshore oil and natural gas properties in the U.S.  The Company's
current operations are principally located in the Cotton Valley
Sand and Haynesville Shale in East Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale in
South Texas, the Granite Wash in the Texas Panhandle, and the North
Louisiana Haynesville.  The Company operates, or has joint working
interests in, approximately 2,100 oil and gas production sites
(approximately 1,800 operating and approximately 315
non-operating)
and has approximately 165 full-time employees.

Sabine Oil and its affiliated entities sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 15-11835) in Manhattan on July 15,
2015.

The Debtors have engaged Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP, as counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, as
investment banker, and Prime Clerk LLC as notice, claims and
balloting agent.  The Debtors also tapped Zolfo Cooper Management,
LLC, to provide Jonathan A. Mitchell as CRO and other additional
personnel.


SALADWORKS LLC: Seeks Sept. 17 Extension of Plan Filing Period
--------------------------------------------------------------
SW Liquidation, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware to extend its exclusive period to file a
Chapter 11 plan to September 17, 2015, and exclusive solicitation
period to November 13, 2015.

Kimberly A. Brown, Esq., at Landis Rath & Cobb LLP, in Wilmington,
Delaware, tells the Court that the Debtor has continued to comply
with its obligations under the Bankruptcy Code and has worked
closely and diligently with other parties in interest on an array
of issues, including the terms of the filed Plan.  She further
tells the Court that allowing this relatively modest extension of
the Exclusive Periods will allow the Debtor a full and fair
opportunity to seek approval of the Disclosure Statement and the
Solicitation Procedures, solicit acceptances of the Plan, seek
confirmation thereof, engage in informed and productive
negotiations with parties in interest, and is appropriate under the
circumstances of the chapter 11 case.

The Debtor's Motion is scheduled for hearing on August 19, 2015 at
10:00 a.m.  The deadline for the filing of objections to the Motion
is set on July 31.

SW Liquidation, LLC, is represented by:

          Adam G. Landis, Esq.
          Kerri K. Mumford, Esq.
          Kimberly A. Brown, Esq.
          LANDIS RATH & COBB LLP
          919 Market Street, Suite 1800
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302)467-4400
          Facsimile: (302)467-4450
          Email: landis@lrclaw.com
                 mumford@lrclaw.com
                 brown@lrclaw.com

              About Saladworks, LLC

Developed in 1986, Saladworks, LLC, is the first and largest
fresh-salad franchise concept in the United States.  From its
beginning in the Cherry Hill Mall, Saladworks quickly expanded to
12 additional locations in area malls and soon thereafter began
franchising.  The company has franchise agreements with 162
different franchisees.  The equity owners are J Scar Holdings,
Inc., (70%) and JVSW LLC (30%).

Saladworks, LLC, sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 15-10327) on Feb. 17, 2015.  The case assigned to
Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein.

The Debtor has tapped Landis Rath & Cobb LLP as counsel; SSG
Advisors, LLC, as investment banker; EisnerAmper LLP, as financial
advisor; and Upshot Services LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

Saladworks, LLC, disclosed $2,303,632 in assets and $14,220,722 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

                *     *     *

SW Liquidation, LLC, f/k/a Saladworks, LLC, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a Chapter 11 Plan of
Liquidation and accompanying disclosure statement following the
sale of substantially all of its assets to a new entity affiliated
with Centre Lane Partners LLC.

With the exception of the assets related to the Paoli Store, the
Buyer will pay $16.9 million, consisting of (a) $15 million in
cash; (b) up to $200,000 in Required Cure Costs for contracts that
are assumed; (c) the assumption of certain liabilities up to a
maximum aggregate amount of $500,000; and (d) the funding of $1.2
million into the Brand Development Fund.

The Debtor estimates that the estate currently has cash in the
approximate amount of $15.5 million.  General Unsecured Claims
(Clas 3) are expected to recover 100% of their allowed claims
amount, while Class C Interests (Class 8) are expected to recover
22.7% to 92.7% of their allowed claims amount.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated July 1, 2015,
is
available at http://bankrupt.com/misc/SWds0701.pdf


SEARS HOLDINGS: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' CCR, Outlook Negative
--------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed all of its ratings,
including its 'CCC+' corporate credit rating, on Sears Holding
Corp.  The outlook is negative.

At the same time, S&P corrected its issue-level rating on Sears
Roebuck Acceptance Corp.'s unsecured debt by lowering it to 'B-'
from 'B'.

"We revised our assessment of Sears' liquidity to "adequate" from
"less than adequate" following the closing the REIT transaction
with Seritage Growth Properties and the extension of a majority of
its ABL facility until 2020, the combination of which represents a
significant boost to liquidity," said credit analyst Robert Schulz.
"Sears disclosed that pro forma for the REIT deal (as of May 2,
2015), cash, and remaining availability under its revolving credit
facilities would have been $3.4 billion (compared with $1.2
billion)."

S&P's negative outlook on Sears reflects S&P's view that weak
operating performance will persist during 2015 and a turnaround
depends on the company's progress with its integrated retail
strategy to reverse the lack of profitability and substantial cash
use.  S&P believes Sears retains significant unencumbered real
estate it can use to generate liquidity, but progress in
stabilizing sales and improving earnings and cash flow are just as
critical to avoid an eventual restructuring.

The outlook is negative since S&P considers the capital structure
to be unstainable longer term at the current level of retail
losses, negative EBITDA, and cash burn.  S&P could lower the rating
if retail cash usage doesn't show signs of abating into late 2016
and leading S&P to envision a specific default scenario.

S&P could consider revising the outlook to stable if it sees
indications that the company's retail segment is recovering,
including prospects for a return to positive EBITDA and if
liquidity seems sufficient for 2017 and beyond.  As S&P evaluates
the benefits from the REIT transaction over the next year, key
considerations will include the company's use of proceeds, how fast
incremental rent obligations may be reduced by landlord space
recapture, and prospects for Sears to turnaround its retail
operations.

S&P views an upgrade as less likely at this time because of S&P's
expectations for continued challenges in the retail segment.


SHERSON GROUP: U.S. Court Issues TRO and Prelim. Injunction
-----------------------------------------------------------
Richter Advisory Group Inc., in its capacity as the trustee and
foreign representative of Sherson Group, Inc., sought and obtained
from Judge Sean H. Lane of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York, a temporary restraining order and a
preliminary injunction in the Debtor's case.

Judge Lane ordered that a temporary restraining order be issued, in
the Debtor's case, on July 7, 2015 at 11:40 a.m., without notice,
enjoining all Persons, and all those acting for or on their behalf,
from taking the following actions in the United States and its
territories:

  (i) Taking any action or proceeding, directly or indirectly,
      to: (a) enforce rights to payment, claims, offsets, liens,
      charges, encumbrances, or interests against the Debtor, the
      Trustee, the Debtor's directors, or Debtor property or its
      estate or business, (b) obtain possession of property of
      the Debtor or property from the Debtor or (c) exercise
      control over the Debtor, its property or its business,
      pending further order of the Court;

(ii) Discontinuing, failing to honor, altering, interfering
      with, repudiating, terminating or ceasing to perform any
      right, renewal right, contract, agreement, license or
      permit in favor of or held by the Debtor, including,
      without limitation, the License Agreement, pending further
      order of the Court;

(iii) Discontinuing, altering, interfering with or terminating
      any oral or written agreement with the Debtor or statutory
      or regulatory mandate for the supply of goods and/or
      services, including without limitation all licensing,
      distribution, product supply, computer software,
      communication and other data services, centralized banking
      services, payroll services, insurance, transportation
      services, utility or other services to the Debtor's
      business or the Debtor, and the Debtor shall be entitled to
      the continued use of its current premises, telephone
      numbers, facsimile numbers, internet addresses and domain
      names; provided, in each case, that the contractual prices
      or charges for all such goods or services received after
      the Canadian Commencement Date are paid by the Debtor in
      accordance with ordinary payment practices of the Debtor or
      such other practices as may be agreed upon by the supplier
      or service provider, the Debtor and the Trustee, or as may
      be ordered by the Canadian Court or as provided for
      expressly under the BIA; and

(iv) Taking any action that would be in violation of any order
      of the Canadian Court or the  Court, until either (a) in
      the event an objection is filed in respect of the
      preliminary injunction and the Second Provisional Order,
      the conclusion of the Preliminary Injunction Hearing or any
      adjournment thereof, or (b) if no objection is filed in
      respect of the preliminary injunction and the Second
      Provisional Order and the Preliminary Injunction Hearing is
      cancelled, the conclusion of the hearing on recognition
      scheduled for July 27, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. or any
      adjournment thereof.

                    About Sherson Group, Inc.

Sherson Group Inc., distributor of the Nine West footwear in 48
retail locations, filed a Chapter 15 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-11765) on July 6, 2015, in Manhattan, to seek
recognition of its Canadian proceedings.

The U.S. case is assigned to Judge Sean H. Lane.  Michael B.
Schaedle, Esq., at Blank Rome LLP, in Philadelphia, serves as U.S.
counsel to the Debtor.

Aird & Berlis has been retained by Sherson Group to represent the
Company as its primary counsel in its Canadian proceeding under the
Canadian Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3.

Richter Advisory Group Inc. was selected by the Company as trustee.
Richter, as foreign representative, signed the Chapter 15
petition.

Sherson Group is one of Canada's premier distributors and retailers
of footwear and accessories.  Its fashion portfolio features names
such as Nine West, Bandolino, Enzo Angiolini, Anne Klein, Easy
Spirit, Adrienne Vittadini, Adrianna Papell, Taryn Rose, Flogg,
Charles David, Circa Joan and David, and Mootsies Tootsies.

The Company's primary brand is Nine West and distribution occurs
primarily through its 48 retail locations in Canada (although a
substantial percentage of sales occur through wholesale and
E-commerce channels).  It employs in excess of 600 workers
throughout Canada.

The Company was established in 1984 as Sherson Marketing Inc.,
which later became Sherson Marketing Corp. and, subsequently
amalgamated with another entity to become Sherson Group.  It is
organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario with a
registered address 1446 Don Mills Road, Suite 100, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada.


STATE FISH: Has Authority to Use Cash Collateral Until Oct. 15
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Sandra R. Klein of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
Central District of California, Los Angeles Division, issued a
Fourth Interim Order authorizing the Chapter 11 Trustee of State
Fish Co., Inc., to use cash collateral of lenders Pan Pac LLC and
Roseann DeLuca Revocable Trust until October 15, 2015.

Pursuant to the Stipulation, the Trustee is authorized to use cash
collateral on an interim basis, pending hearing on the motion.  All
expenditures of cash collateral in any amount during the chapter 11
case must conform in every respect to the Stipulation and the
budgets filed by the Trustee.  The Trustee's right to use cash
collateral shall extend to and automatically terminate on October
15, 2015.

A continued hearing will be on October 8, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.

                           About State Fish

State Fish Co., Inc. was founded in 1932 and began as a small local
wholesale fish buyer in California.  Under the leadership of Sam
DeLuca, State Fish expanded from a small fresh fish company to an
internationally-known import and export company operating its own
processing and cold store facilities near the Port of Los Angeles.
Calpack Foods, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary, was formed in April
2012 to produce high quality food and beverage products.

State Fish and Calpack Foods filed voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (C.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 15-11084) on Jan. 26, 2015, amid
a family dispute and liquidity woes brought by declining fish
catches.  Sisters Vanessa DeLuca, Roseann DeLuca and Janet
Esposito, backed the bankruptcy filing while John DeLuca has
opposed the Chapter 11 effort.

The Hon. Sandra R. Klein presides over the jointly administered
cases.  Amir Gamliel, Esq., and Alan D Smith, Esq., at Perkins Coie
LLP serve as the Debtors' counsel.  George Blanco, at Avant
Advisory Group acts as chief restructuring officer.

State Fish disclosed $34,868,772 in assets and $10,084,671 in
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed three entities -- Cedar Cold
Services LLC, Star-Box Inc., and Queen City Seafood Sales – to
serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors.  The panel
has tapped Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP to serve as its
general counsel.

R. Todd Neilson was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee effective as of
Feb. 27, 2015.


SUNCOKE ENERGY: Recent Acquisitions No Impact on Moody's Ba3 CFR
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service said that the ratings of SunCoke Energy
Partners, L.P. (SXCP), including the Ba3 CFR, Ba3-PD PDR, senior
unsecured rating of B1 and stable outlook, are unaffected by the
company's agreement to acquire Convent Marine Terminal from Raven
Energy Partners for $412 million. Ratings are also unaffected by
SXCP's agreement to acquire an additional 23% equity interest in
Granite City from parent company SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) for $67
million. The Convent acquisition will be financed initially with a
combination of limited partnership units, approximately $115
million of assumed debt, and approximately $214 million with SXCP
revolver/cash. SXCP plans to refinance the $214 million by issuing
new notes at a future date. The Granite City dropdown will be
funded by an assumption of SXC's senior unsecured notes and the
issuance to SXC of general and limited partner interests in SXCP.



SUNTECH AMERICA: Has Unti Aug. 10 to Decide on Unexpired Leases
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware extended until Aug. 10, 2015, the deadline
for Suntech America, Inc., et al., to assume or reject unexpired
leases of nonresidential real property.

Joseph C. Barsalona II, Esq., at Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.,
counsel for the Debtors, filed a certificate of no objection
regarding the Debtors' motion to extend the lease decision
deadline.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on May 19, 2015, the
Debtors explained that their unexpired leases relate to property
that represents the entirety of the Debtors' locations where they
conduct their businesses.  All of the unexpired leases are
necessary for the Debtors to maintain operations, store valuable
assets, and manage their businesses.

                       About Suntech America

Suntech America, Inc., and Suntech Arizona, Inc. filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 15-10054 and
15-10056) on Jan. 12, 2015.  Judge Christopher S. Sontchi presides
over the case.

Mark D. Collins, Esq., Paul Noble Heath, Esq., William A.
Romanowicz, Esq., Zachary I Shapiro, Esq., at Richards, Layton &
Finger, P.A., serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  Upshot
Services LLC is the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

The Debtors estimated their assets at between $100 million and
$500 million, and their debts at between $100 million and $500
million.

Headquartered in San Francisco, California, Suntech America, aka
Suntech Power, an affiliate of Wuxi, China-based Suntech Power
Holdings Corp., was the main operating subsidiary of the Suntech
Group in the Americas and its primary business purpose was acting
as an intermediary for marketing, selling and distributing Suntech
Group manufactured products.



SUNVALLEY SOLAR: Issues 2 Million Preferred Shares
--------------------------------------------------
Sunvalley Solar, Inc., issued a total of 2,000,000 shares of its
newly designated Class B Convertible Preferred Stock to these
individuals:

          Zhijian (James) Zhang    1,250,000 shares
          Hangbo (Henry) Yu          325,000 shares
          Waiman Mandy Chung          70,000 shares
          Anyork Lee                  50,000 shares
          Shirley Liao                70,000 shares
          William Hsien               70,000 shares
          Mehmet Cercioglu            55,000 shares
          Thomas L. Louie             30,000 shares
          Dan Shi                     20,000 shares
          Fang Xu                     60,000 shares

These shares were issued as incentive compensation for services
rendered or to be rendered by certain officers, directors, and key
employees of the Company, and the issuance to each individual is
governed by a Restricted Stock Award Agreement.  Under the relevant
award agreements, the shares issued are subject to forfeiture in
event of the recipient's resignation or dismissal within one year
of issuance.  Prior to vesting, the shares issued may not be
transferred or encumbered.

The shares of Class B Convertible Preferred Stock vote together
with the Company's Common shares, but shares of the Class B
Convertible Preferred Stock have 10 votes per share.  The Class B
Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of the
Company's Common Stock at the conversion rate of one Class B
Convertible Preferred Share for 10 Common shares.

             Amendments to Articles of Incorporation

On July 23, 2015, the Company filed a Certificate of Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of
State's office.  It became effective on the filing date.

Article III of the Company's Restated Articles was amended to
increase the number of its total authorized shares of Common Stock
from 4,500,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares, and to increase the
number of the Company's total authorized shares of Preferred Stock
from 1,000,000 shares to 6,000,000 shares.  The general rights and
preferences of the Common Stock and Preferred Stock have been
clarified in Article III of the Restated Articles.

Article VII of the Restated Articles now provides that the Company
will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent
permissible under Nevada Law.  

Articles IX and X of the Restated Articles now provide that the
provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes Sections 78.378 to
78.3793, inclusive, (acquisition of a controlling interest) and
Sections 78.411 to 78.444, inclusive, (combinations with interested
stockholders) are not applicable to the Company.

Pursuant to Article III of the Company's Restated Articles, the
Company's Board of Directors voted to designate a class of
preferred stock entitled Class B Convertible Preferred Stock,
consisting of two million (2,000,000) shares, par value $0.001. The
rights of the holders of Class B Convertible Preferred Stock are
defined in the Certificate of Designation of Sunvalley Solar, Inc.
Class B Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary
of State on July 23, 2015.  It became effective on the filing
date.

Holders of shares of Class B Convertible Preferred Stock are
entitled to vote together with the holders of the Company's Common
Stock on all matters submitted to shareholders at a rate of 10
votes for each Class B Convertible Preferred share held.  Holders
of shares of Common Stock have one vote per each Common share
held.

Holders of shares of Class B Convertible Preferred Stock are also
entitled, at their option, to convert their shares of Class B
Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of the Company's Common
Stock on a one Class B Preferred share for 10 Common shares.

Under the Certificate of Designation, holders of shares of Class B
Convertible Preferred Stock will participate on an equal basis
per-share with holders of the Company's Common Stock in any
distribution out of the Company's assets upon winding up,
dissolution, or liquidation, after giving effect to the Conversion
Rate.

                       About Sunvalley Solar

Sunvalley Solar, Inc., is a California-based solar power
technology and system integration company.  Since the inception of
its business in 2007, the company has focused on developing its
expertise and proprietary technology to install residential,
commercial and governmental solar power systems.

Sunvalley Solar reported a net loss of $1.28 million on $3.31
million of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared with
net income of $764,000 on $4.09 million of revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $6.34 million in total
assets, $5.78 million in total liabilities and $561,000 in total
stockholders' equity.

Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC, in Salt Lake City, UT, issued a
"going concern" qualification on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the
Company has an accumulated deficit of $3.65 million, which raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


SURVEYMONKEY INC: Moody's Cuts Corporate Family Rating to 'B3'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded SurveyMonkey Inc. corporate
family rating (CFR) to B3 from B2. The $315 million 1st lien term
loan and $75 million revolver were downgraded to B3 (LGD3) from B2
(LGD3). The outlook is stable.

The reason for the downgrade is the leverage level that we had
expected has not been achieved and we anticipate leverage will
increase going forward as higher expenses (including stock
compensation) weigh on EBITDA levels. While reported revenue
(including discontinued operations in 2013) grew almost twenty
percent in 2014 and is expected to increase at comparable levels
going forward, costs of revenue and operating expense are expected
to grow significantly higher and negatively impact EBITDA. Moody's
adjusted leverage (which includes stock compensation as an expense)
is expected to increase to approximately 8x by the end of 2015.

Issuer: SurveyMonkey Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, downgraded to B3 from B2

  Probability of Default Rating, downgraded to Caa1-PD from
  B3-PD

  $315 million Term loan B due 2019, downgraded to B3 (LGD3) from
  B2 (LGD3)

  $75 million Revolver due 2018, downgraded to B3 (LGD3) from
B2(LGD3)

Outlook, Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

SurveyMonkey's B3 CFR reflects the company's high financial
leverage, relatively small size, and concentration in a segment of
the web based survey market. The rating also include near term
investments, higher expense and foreign exchange headwinds that
will impact EBITDA in 2015. The company also faces risk from
competition from numerous smaller competitors, and the potential
for new technologies or product offerings that could disrupt its
business model. Technology risk to the credit is magnified by the
lack of product diversification. Support for the ratings comes from
the company's high revenue growth rates over the past several years
and good free cash flow. The company also benefits from an equity
raise completed in Q4 2014 that bolstered its liquidity position. A
significant amount of free cash flow is expected to be generated
internationally as a large amount of the costs are based in the US
and its debt is denominated in US$. While the Do-It-Yourself (DIY)
survey market segment is modest in size with a vast number of small
competitors, SurveyMonkey has a very strong position and Moody's
believes it would be difficult for an existing competitor to take
material market share from the company.

"Moody's financial leverage using cash EBITDA, which includes the
change in deferred revenue as income and stock compensation as an
expense, is 6.2x as of Q1 2015. Higher than anticipated costs are
expected to increase leverage to approximately 8x by the end of the
year. We expect that a portion of the additional expense is success
based and will lead to higher revenues or be cut back if they don't
achieve the results anticipated."

"SurveyMonkey is expected to have good liquidity given the
company's $75 million revolver and cash balance of over $60 million
(as of Q1 2015) following the company's equity raise in Q4 2014. We
anticipate that part of the cash will be used for acquisitions. We
expect the company will earn a substantial portion of its free cash
flow and hold material amounts of cash at its international
operations that would be subject to repatriation taxes if brought
back to the United States. We don't expect the international cash
balances to be repatriated unless it's necessary, given the tax
implications."

The existing credit agreement includes a maximum leverage ratio
covenant of 5.25x as of Q2 2015 and decreases to 4.75x on Q3 2015,
4.25x on Q4 2015, and 4x on Q1 2016 for the life of the deal. The
current leverage ratio as calculated by the credit agreement is
3.5x as of Q1 2015, but is expected to increase over the rest of
the year. We anticipate that the company will successfully amend
its credit agreement to maintain a sufficient cushion of compliance
with its covenants.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation that revenue
will grow in the high teens percentage rate given its market
position in its operating segment and maintain good free cash flow
levels. Higher expenses, including stock compensation expense, is
anticipated to weigh on EBITDA and lead to elevated leverage levels
as calculated by Moody's.

Given the high leverage levels, an upgrade is not anticipated in
the near term. SurveyMonkey's small size, narrow product focus and
technology risks also reduce upward rating pressure. However,
positive rating pressure could develop if the company achieves
leverage levels sustained below 6.5x (including Moody's standard
adjustments). A stable market position, positive revenue growth,
good EBITDA margins and free cash flow would also be required.

A downgrade would occur due to overall weak operating performance,
lost market share, technological disruptions, stock repurchases
that impaired its liquidity position, or increased concern about
its ability to remain in compliance with its covenants.

SurveyMonkey Inc. is privately owned online survey company that was
founded in 1999.


TEXAS REGENCY APARTMENTS: Has Interim Authority to Use Cash
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge David R. Jones of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, granted Texas Regency
Apartments, L.P., interim authority to use cash collateral securing
its prepetition indebtedness.

The Debtor is allowed to use the Cash Collateral provided that the
use of such Cash Collateral will not vary by category by more than
10%, except that any savings in the Budget in one category, will be
available to cover any deficit in another category and,
irrespective of the 10% variance permitted, the Debtor may not
exceed the aggregate total expenditures set forth in the Budget.

As to adequate protection for the Lender's interest in the Debtor's
continued use and operation of the Real Property and use of the
Cash Collateral, the Debtor will: (i) make the following adequate
protection payments directly to the Lender each month: July 15,
2015 - $40,000 August 15, 2015 - $40,000 September 15, 2015 -
$40,000; timely pay all undisputed post-petition taxes and use the
Cash Collateral so that the Cash Collateral is solely being used
for purposes of direct operation, management, maintenance and
repair of the Property.

The Debtor explained that it needs an immediate authority to use
its cash collateral to be able to meet its ongoing operational
expenses, and its estate will suffer immediate and irreparable
harm.

TD Bank, owed $11,080,286, complained that the Debtor has not met
the requirements of Sections 361 and 363 of the Bankruptcy Code to
demonstrate an actual need to use the Cash Collateral and to
provide TD Bank with adequate protection of the diminution of its
interest in the Cash Collateral as the Debtor uses it.  The Debtor,
the bank further complained, cannot meet its burden to show that it
"needs" the Cash Collateral because no plan of reorganization
exists for this Debtor.  It is not beneficial to the estate or the
Debtor's creditors, TD Bank or otherwise, to permit the Debtor to
continue trying to operate the Apartment Complex while burning
through over $100,000 of Rents each month, $228,446 of Escrowed
Funds, failing to account for accruing real estate taxes, and
falling further into debt by borrowing $114,000 from a third-party,
related entity, TD Bank said.  Further, the Debtor cannot meet its
burden to show that it is providing adequate protection to TD Bank
for its use of the Cash Collateral, the bank further argued.

In response, the Debtor explained that the proposed cash infusion
from Jaymor USA, Inc. is not a loan and does not constitute
post-petition borrowing and the Debtor can operate as viable entity
with the use of cash collateral.

A final hearing on the Cash Collateral Motion is scheduled for
August 13, 2015 at 3:00 p.m.

Texas Regency Apartments, L.P. is represented by:

          Matthew Hoffman, Esq.
          Alan Brian Saweris, Esq.
          Law Offices of Matthew Hoffman, PC
          2777 Allen Parkway, Suite 1000
          Houston, Texas 77019
          Tel.: 713 654-9990
          Fax: 713 654-0038

TD Bank NA is represented by:

          Scott R. Cheatham, Esq.
          701 Poydras Street, Suite 4500
          New Orleans, Louisiana 70139
          Tel.: 504 581-3234
          Fax: 504 566-0210
          Email: scott.cheatham@arlaw.com

                       About Texas Regency Apartments, L.P.

Texas Regency Apartments, L.P., owner of the Regency Square
Apartments at 7222 Bellerive Dr., Houston, Texas, sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 15-33188) in Houston, Texas,
on June 10, 2015.  Gordon Steele signed the petition chief
financial officer.  The Debtor disclosed total assets of $11.1
million and total liabilities of $11.4 million.

The Debtor tapped Matthew Hoffman, Esq., at the Law Offices of
Matthew Hoffman, P.C., as counsel.

Judge David R. Jones presides over the case.


TMT GROUP: Temporary Injunction in Suit Over Vantage Shares Upheld
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston,
affirmed a trial court's order for temporary injunction and denied
a motion to void state court proceedings, or alternatively motion
to increase temporary injunction bond pending interlocutory appeal
of injunction order in the appeal case captioned HSIN-CHI-SU AKA
NOBU SU, Appellant, v. VANTAGE DRILLING COMPANY, Appellee, Case No.
14-14-00461-CV, (Tex. App.).

Vantage Drilling Company sued Hsin-Chi-Su aka Nobu Su seeking,
inter alia, to recover Vantage shares held by Su's wholly-owned
affiliate, F3 Capital, on the ground the stock was acquired via
Su's fraud and breach of fiduciary duties.  The trial court signed
a temporary injunction precluding Su from disposing of, or
otherwise encumbering, the shares pending final judgment.

In five appellate issues, Su attacks the merits of the injunctive
relief and the amount of the temporary-injunction bond that Vantage
was ordered to post. Su has also filed in our court a "Motion to
Void State Court Proceedings, Or Alternatively Motion to Increase
Temporary Injunction Bond Pending Interlocutory Appeal of
Injunction Order."

Justice Donovan affirmed the temporary injunction and denied the
Su's motion. The Court of Appeals found that the trial court did
not abuse its discretion by setting the bond at $125,695.81.  The
record does not reflect that Su ever complained in the trial court
that no remand order had been signed. Su first raises the issue in
his appellate motion. Thus, Su waived his complaint that the case
was not remanded in compliance with federal procedures.
Accordingly, because the case was remanded, the trial court had
jurisdiction to sign the temporary injunction. We overrule the
portion of Su's appellate motion contending the trial court lacked
jurisdiction and turn to his challenges to the merits of the
temporary injunction. Vantage presented evidence it would suffer a
probable, imminent, and irreparable injury before trial if a
temporary injunction did not issue because of Su's previous actions
in placing, or attempting to place, the shares out Vantage's reach.
We overrule Su's third issue.

A full-text copy of the Opinion dated July 14, 2015, is available
at http://is.gd/Inl9lJfrom Leagle.com.

                     About TMT Group

Known in the industry as TMT Group, TMT USA Shipmanagement LLC and
its affiliates own 17 vessels.  Vessels range in size from 27,000
dead weight tons (dwt) to 320,000 dwt.

TMT USA and 22 affiliates, including C. Ladybug Corporation, sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 13-33740) in
Houston, Texas, on June 20, 2013 after lenders seized seven
vessels.

TMT filed a lawsuit in U.S. bankruptcy court aimed at forcing
creditors to release the vessels so they can return to generating
income.

TMT has tapped attorneys from Bracewell & Giuliani LLP as
bankruptcy counsel and AlixPartners as financial advisors.

On a consolidated basis, the Debtors have $1.52 billion in assets
and $1.46 billion in liabilities.


TONYA BROWN: Carlisle Wins Summary Judgment as to R. Brown Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp of United States District Court
for Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, granted the motion
for summary judgment filed by Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer &
Ulrich, Co., LPA, as to the claims brought by Ronald Brown and
denied the motion for leave to file an amended complaint and
injunction or motion to stay in the case.

The case is Ronald Brown, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Florida Coastal
Partners, LLC, Defendants, Case No. 2:13-CV-1225, (S.D. Ohio).

A full-text of Magistrate Kemp's Opinion and Order dated July 10,
2015, is available at http://is.gd/BpuRq6from Leagle.com.

Ronald Brown, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Tonya Brown, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Charles Roland Griffith, Esq., serves as counsel for Defendants
Florida Coastal Partners, LLC and Charles R. Griffith.

Eric T. Deighton, Esq., of Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer &
Ulrich, CO, LPA serve as counsel for Defendant Carlisle McNellie
Rini Kramer & Ulrich Co. LPA.


TRANS COASTAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Trans Coastal Supply Company, Inc.
        2803 North 22nd Street
        Decatur, IL 62526

Case No.: 15-71147

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 23, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of Illinois (Springfield)

Judge: Hon. Mary P. Gorman

Debtor's Counsel: Jeffrey D Richardson, Esq.
                  RICHARDSON & ERICKSON
                  132 South Water Street, Suite 444
                  Decatur, IL 62523
                  Tel: (217) 425-4082
                  Email: jdrdec@aol.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Pamela D. Moses, president.

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
CHS, Inc.                            Trade Debt       $12,103,416
NW 9365
P. O. Box 1450
Minneapolis, MN 55485

The Andersons Clymers                Trade Debt        $3,014,860
P. O. Box 119
Maumee, OH 43537

Gavilon Con Agra                     Trade Debt        $2,956,029
24301 Network Place
Chicago, IL 60673-1234

JD Heiskell & Co.                    Trade Debt        $1,590,857
20010 Manderson Street
Elkhorn , NE 68022

Three Rivers Ethanol                 Trade Debt        $1,092,000
18137 CR 271
Coshocton, OH 43812

Commodity Specialist Company         Trade Debt        $1,005,290
55 Corporate Woods
Suite 115
Overland Park, KS 66210

Green Plains Trade Group, LLC        Trade Debt          $900,365
450 Regency Parkway
Omaha, NE 68114

Yang Ming (America) Corp             Trade Debt          $633,933
3025 Highland  Parkway
Suite 850
Downers Grove, IL 60515

Cargill, Inc.                        Trade Debt          $594,357
Attn: Paul Calahan
15407 McGinty East Rd.
MS#20
Wayzata, MN 55391

Lansing Vermont                      Trade Debt          $529,764
P. O. Box 741671
Atlanta, GA 30374-1671

Evergreen Line                       Trade Debt          $459,693
823 Commerce Dr. 2nd Floor
Oak Brook, Illinois
60523

Aventine Renewable                   Trade Debt          $439,823
Energy, Inc.
P. O. Box 310363
Des Moines, IA 50331

Didion Ethanol                       Trade Debt          $425,342
P. O. Box 400
Johnson Creek, WI 53038

Renewable Products                   Trade Debt          $394,433
Marketing
1157 Valley Park Drive
Shakopee, MN 55379

The Scoular Company                  Trade Debt          $380,212
10801 Mastin Blvd.
Overland Park, KS 66210

Bunge North America                  Trade Debt          $362,483
11720 Borman Drive
P. O. Box 28500
St. Louis, MO 63146

China Shipping (North                Trade Debt          $358,205
America) Agency
Attn: Scott Levine
11 Philips Pkwy
Montvale, NJ 07645

Ceres Consulting, LLC                Trade Debt          $348,184
3808 cookson Road
East St. Louis, IL 62201

Marquis Energy -                     Trade Debt          $330,643
Wisconsin
P. O. Box 349
Hennepin, IL 61327

Cosco Container Lines                Trade Debt          $304,063
333 E. Butterfield Road
Suite 830
Lombard, IL 60148


TRANSGENOMIC INC: Registers 3.3 Million Shares for Resale
---------------------------------------------------------
Transgenomic, Inc., filed a Form S-3 registration statement with
the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the resale by
certain investors of up to 3,318,048 shares of the Company's common
stock, par value $0.01 per share.  The 3,318,048 shares of Common
Stock consist of:

   (i) up to 1,473,512 shares of Common Stock;

  (ii) up to 1,177,372 shares of Common Stock issuable upon
       exercise of outstanding Series A warrants to purchase
       shares of Common Stock; and

(iii) up to 667,164 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise
       of outstanding Series B warrants to purchase shares of
       Common Stock.

The Company will bear all costs, expenses and fees in connection
with the registration of the Securities.  The Selling Stockholders
will bear all commissions and discounts, if any, attributable to
their respective sales of the Securities.

The Company's Common Stock is currently listed on the NASDAQ
Capital Market under the symbol "TBIO".  On July 21, 2015, the last
reported sales price for the Company's Common Stock was $1.60 per
share.

A copy of the Form S-3 prospectus is available at:

                        http://is.gd/t0oV0z

                         About Transgenomic

Transgenomic, Inc. -- http://www.transgenomic.com/-- is a global  

biotechnology company advancing personalized medicine in
cardiology, oncology, and inherited diseases through its
proprietary molecular technologies and world-class clinical and
research services.  The Company is a global leader in cardiac
genetic testing with a family of innovative products, including
its C-GAAP test, designed to detect gene mutations which indicate
cardiac disorders, or which can lead to serious adverse events.
Transgenomic has three complementary business divisions:
Transgenomic Clinical Laboratories, which specializes in molecular
diagnostics for cardiology, oncology, neurology, and mitochondrial
disorders; Transgenomic Pharmacogenomic Services, a contract
research laboratory that specializes in supporting all phases of
pre-clinical and clinical trials for oncology drugs in
development; and Transgenomic Diagnostic Tools, which produces
equipment, reagents, and other consumables that empower clinical
and research applications in molecular testing and cytogenetics.
Transgenomic believes there is significant opportunity for
continued growth across all three businesses by leveraging their
synergistic capabilities, technologies, and expertise.  The
Company actively develops and acquires new technology and other
intellectual property that strengthens its leadership in
personalized medicine.

Transgenomic reported a net loss available to common stockholders
of $15.1 million in 2014, a net loss available to common
stockholders of $16.7 million in 2013 and a net loss available to
common stockholders of $8.98 million in 2012.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $34.5 million in total
assets, $24.4 million in total liabilities and $10 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Ernst & Young LLP, in Hartford, Connecticut, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has recurring
losses from operations that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.


TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT: Loses Bid to Silence Union Campaign
--------------------------------------------------------
Peg Brickley, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported that
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross in Delaware has refused to shield
what is left of Donald Trump's former Atlantic City, N.J., casino
empire from union protests.

According to the report, Judge Gross said in a decision issued on
July 21 that when it comes to a campaign meant to warn potential
customers of the Trump Taj Mahal that workers are unhappy, federal
labor laws protect the workers.  The ruling comes after months of
street demonstrations led by Unite Here Local 54, the union that
represents workers that lost health care and other benefits due to
the financial distress of Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc., the
Journal noted.

               About Trump Entertainment Resorts

Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc., owner of the Atlantic City
Boardwalk casinos that bear the name of Donald Trump, returned to
Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 14-12103) on Sept.
9, 2014, with plans to shutter its casinos.

TER and its affiliated debtors own and operate two casino hotels
located in Atlantic City, New Jersey.  TER said it will close the
Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort by Sept. 16, 2014, and, absent union
concessions, the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino by Nov. 13, 2104.

The Debtors have sought an order authorizing the joint
administration of their Chapter 11 cases and the consolidation
thereof for procedural purposes only.  Judge Kevin Gross presides
over the Chapter 11 cases.

The Debtors have tapped Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as
counsel; Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, as co-counsel; Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc., as financial advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC, as
noticing and claims agent.

TER estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors as of Sept. 9, 2014, owe $285.6 million in principal
plus accrued but unpaid interest of $6.6 million under a first
lien
debt issued under their 2010 bankruptcy-exit plan.  The Debtors
also have trade debt in the amount of $13.5 million.

                         *     *     *

Judge Kevin Gross of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware on March 12, 2015, confirmed Trump Entertainment Resorts,
Inc., et al.'s Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization and
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The Debtors filed on January 5, 2015, the Plan and accompanying
Disclosure Statement to, among other things, provide that holders
of General Unsecured Claims will receive Distribution Trust
Interests, which will include $1 million in cash and the proceeds,
if any, of certain avoidance actions.  Under the revised plan,
holders of general unsecured claims are estimated to recover 0.47%
to 0.43% of their total allowed claim amount.  The Amended Plan
also includes language reflecting the recently-approved $20
million
loan from Carl Icahn.

A full-text copy of the Findings of Fact is available for free at:
http://bankrupt.com/misc/TRUMPENTERTAINMENT_Plan_Findings.pdf


TWIN RINKS: Estimates Assets and Debt at $10M to $50M
-----------------------------------------------------
Twin Rinks At Eisenhower, LLC, refiled with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York its petition to disclose
estimated assets and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

                         About Twin Rinks

Twin Rinks At Eisenhower, LLC, an East Meadow, New York-based ice
skating rink operator and entertainment business, sought Chapter
11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-72466) on June
8, 2015, with plans to sell its business and its assets as a going
concern.

The Debtor disclosed $52.4 million in assets and $55.2 million in
debt as of May 25, 2015.  

The Debtor tapped Jones & Schwartz, P.C., as counsel, and Greenspan
Associates, CPAs, as accountants.

The U.S. Trustee appointed three creditors to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors.   The Committee tapped Meyer,
Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. as its general counsel.


TWIN RINKS: Final Hearing on Cash Collateral Set for Aug. 26
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York
entered a second interim order authorizing Twin Rinks at
Eisenhower, LLC, to:

   i) use certain cash that CMBS Venture Funding, LLC, asserts
constitutes cash collateral under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy
Code; and

  ii) provide CMBS certain adequate protection.

A final hearing on the Debtor's use of cash collateral is scheduled
for Aug. 26, 2015, at 1:30 p.m.

The Debtor is authorized to use (a) cash, including cash on deposit
in its operating and DIP account and (b) cash produced as revenue
from the continued operation of the Debtor's business, all in
accordance with budget.

The rights of Parr Properties Inc. and any official committee of
unsecured creditors to contest whether such cash constitutes the
cash collateral of CMBS under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code
are fully preserved.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on June 19, 2015,
prior to the Petition Date, Darien Rowayton Bank made secured loans
and advances to the Debtor in the sum of $5,250,000.  The
obligations, liabilities and indebtedness of the Debtor were
assigned to CMBS, an affiliate of the Debtor, on or about June 2,
2015, and as of the Petition Date, total approximately $5,272,725.

The CMBS Claim is secured by substantially all of the assets of the
Debtor.

As security for the prompt payment of the indebtedness of the
Debtor, CMBS will be granted valid and perfected first priority
security interests and liens, in and upon all now exiting and
hereafter acquired property of the estate of the Debtor.

The Debtor's counsel, Harold D. Jones, Esq., at Jones & Schwartz,
P.C., in Carle Place, New York, tells the Court that the Debtor has
an immediate and urgent need to obtain use of cash collateral to
continue its operations.  A lack of access to funds would
irreparably diminish, if not destroy, the value of the Debtor's
estate, Mr. Jones says.  Indeed, without access to funds provided
for in the Financing Order for use in the ordinary course, the
Debtor may be forced to entirely shut down its business operations,
Mr. Jones added.

                         About Twin Rinks

Twin Rinks At Eisenhower, LLC, an East Meadow, New York-based ice
skating rink operator and entertainment business, sought Chapter
11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-72466) on June
8, 2015, with plans to sell its business and its assets as a going
concern.

The Debtor disclosed $52.4 million in assets and $55.2 million in
debt as of May 25, 2015.  

The Debtor tapped Jones & Schwartz, P.C., as counsel, and
Greenspan
Associates, CPAs, as accountants.

The U.S. Trustee appointed three creditors to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors.   The Committee tapped Meyer,
Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. as its general counsel.



TXU CORP: 2014 Bank Debt Trades at 44% Off
------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which TXU Corp. is a
borrower traded in the secondary market at 56.35
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, July 17, 2015,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing and
reported in the July 23, 2015 edition of The Wall Street Journal.
This represents a decrease of 0.60 percentage points from the
previous week, The Journal relates.  TXU Corp. pays 350 basis
points above LIBOR to borrow under the facility.  The bank loan
matured on Oct. 10, 2014 and Moody's withdrew its rating while
Standard & Poor's did not give any rating.  The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 234 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended July
17.


VERMILLION INC: May Issue 4.5 Million Shares Under Stock Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
Vermillion, Inc., filed a Form S-8 registration statement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission to register 4,500,000 shares of
common stock issuable under the Company's Second Amended and
Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.  The proposed maximum aggregate
offering price is $9.1 million.  

A Registration Statement on Form S-8 was filed with the SEC on
May 28, 2010, covering the registration of 1,322,983 shares of
Common Stock under the Plan.  In addition, on Jan. 10, 2014, a
Registration Statement on Form S-8 was filed with the Commission
covering the registration of an additional 2,300,000 shares of
Common Stock under the Plan.  

A copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                        http://is.gd/Bv8enx

                          About Vermillion

Vermillion, Inc., is dedicated to the discovery, development and
commercialization of novel high-value diagnostic tests that help
physicians diagnose, treat and improve outcomes for patients.
Vermillion, along with its prestigious scientific collaborators,
has diagnostic programs in oncology, hematology, cardiology and
women's health.

The Company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 09-11091) on March 30, 2009.  Vermillion's legal
advisor in connection with its successful reorganization efforts
wass Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP.  Vermillion emerged
from bankruptcy in January 2010.  The Plan called for the Company
to pay all claims in full and equity holders to retain control of
the Company.

Vermillion reported a net loss of $19.2 million in 2014, a net loss
of $8.81 million in 2013 and a net loss of $7.14 million in 2012.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $18.67 million in total
assets, $3.48 million in total liabilities and $15.19 million in
total stockholders' equity.


VICKIE LYNN MARSHALL: Attorneys' Fees Awarded to Pierce Reversed
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston, reversed
the attorneys' fees awarded in the appeal case captioned HOWARD
STERN AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF VICKIE LYNN MARSHALL, Appellant,
v. ELAINE MARSHALL AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF E.
PIERCE MARSHALL, ROBERT MCINTYRE AS TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
ESTATE OF J. HOWARD MARSHALL, II, APPLICATION TO APPOINT ELAINE
MARSHALL PENDING, IV ELAINE MARSHALL AS TRUSTEE OF THE MARSHALL
GRANDCHILDREN'S TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF E. PIERCE MARSHALL, JR.,
ELAINE MARSHALL AS TRUSTEE OF THE MARSHALL GRANDCHILDREN'S TRUST
FOR THE BENEFIT OF PRESTON MARSHALL, E. PIERCE MARSHALL, JR.,
ELAINE MARSHALL, AND PRESTON MARSHALL AS TRUSTEES OF THE MARSHALL
PETROLEUM, INC. STOCK HOLDING TRUST, E. PIERCE MARSHALL, JR.,
ELAINE MARSHALL, AND PRESTON MARSHALL AS TRUSTEES OF THE MARSHALL
HERITAGE FOUNDATION AND THE MARSHALL LEGACY FOUNDATION, ELAINE
MARSHALL AS TRUSTEE OF THE BETTYE B. MARSHALL LIVING TRUST, ELAINE
MARSHALL AS TRUSTEE OF THE J. HOWARD MARSHALL, II, MARITAL TRUST
NUMBER TWO, ELAINE MARSHALL AS TRUSTEE OF THE E. PIERCE MARSHALL
FAMILY TRUST CREATED UNDER THE BETTYE B. MARSHALL LIVING TRUST
INDENTURE DATED OCTOBER 30, 1990, ELAINE MARSHALL INDIVIDUALLY
ELAINE MARSHALL AS TRUSTEE OF THE MARSHALL GRANDCHILDREN'S TRUST
FOR THE BENEFIT OF E. PIERCE MARSHALL, JR., ELAINE MARSHALL AS
TRUSTEE OF THE MARSHALL GRANDCHILDREN' TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF
PRESTON MARSHALL, E. PIERCE MARSHALL, JR., PRESTON MARSHALL, TROF,
INC., FINLEY HILLIARD, ELAINE MARSHALL AND STEPHEN COOK AS TRUSTEES
OF THE J. HOWARD MARSHALL, II LIVING TRUST, E. PIERCE MARSHALL,
JR., ELAINE MARSHALL AND PRESTON MARSHALL AS TRUSTEES OF THE
MARSHALL PETROLEUM, INC. STOCK HOLDING TRUST, Appellees, Case No.
01-02-00114-CV, (Tex. App.).

The Court of Appeals reversed the attorneys' fees awarded to E.
Pierce Marshall from Vickie Lynn Marshall and render judgment that
Pierce take nothing on that claim.  The Court of Appeals agrees
with the probate court that, at the time of Vickie's nonsuit, the
Marshall Family defendants had tortious-interference claims pending
that qualified as affirmative claims for relief under Rule 162.
The Marshall Family defendants pleaded that Vickie has
"intentionally interfered with the inheritance rights of the
Marshall Family Defendants by filing this lawsuit," and that she
"intentionally invaded the personal and property rights of the
Marshall Family Defendants . . . without any just cause or excuse,"
which amounted to "intentional interference with administration of
the estate of Howard, Sr."

While Stern offers several reasons that any tortious interference
claim based upon the conduct cited in the Marshall Family
defendant's pleadings would ultimately fail, his arguments conflate
the concepts of affirmative independent claims for relief and
claims for relief that will ultimately lead to recovery, the Court
of Appeals said.  The Court of Appeals added that whether an
affirmative claim is pleaded for purposes of Rule 162 turns on the
former, not the latter.  Because the Marshall defendants had
pending affirmative claims for relief in the form of tortious
interference claims against Vickie, the probate court did not err
in refusing to dismiss Vickie from the underlying suit when she
nonsuited her claims, the Court of Appeals said.  Stern does not
complain that the Marshall defendants actually requested a
declaration of non-liability for a tort from the Texas probate
court.  Instead, he complains that Pierce was able to use a
declaration in the Texas probate court to defeat a tort award in
California.  The Court of Appeals said its concern in the case is
whether the probate court properly found the Marshall defendants'
requested declarations to be within the gamut of the Texas
Declaratory Judgment Act, not whether those declarations -- once
obtained -- could be used elsewhere for a different purpose.

A full-text copy of the Court of Appeals' Opinion dated July 14,
2015, is available at http://bitly.com/1OemvJufrom Leagle.com.


VICTORY ENERGY: Amends Rogers Settlement Agreement
--------------------------------------------------
Victory Energy Corporation entered into an Amendment to settlement
agreement and Mutual Release with Louise H. Rogers dated June 24,
2015.  Pursuant to the Amendment, the Company and Rogers agreed
that the amount to be paid by the Company to Rogers under the
Rogers Settlement Agreement is $258,125, instead of $253,750.  The
Amendment further specified that if the Company failed to make the
payment of $258,125 on or before July 15, 2015, the Company would
be in default under the Rogers Settlement Agreement and default
interest on the amount due would begin to accrue at a per diem rate
of $129.0625.  Additionally, the Company acknowledged in the
Amendment its obligation to pay Rogers' attorney's fees in the
amount of $22,500.  As of July 22, 2015, the Company has not made
any payments to Rogers pursuant to the Rogers Settlement
Agreement.

As previously reported, Rogers' legal counsel is holding the
assignment to the Company of Lucas Energy, Inc.'s rights to a
certain oil and gas property and 44,069 shares of Lucas Energy,
Inc. common stock issued to the Company in escrow pending the
Company's payment of all amounts due under the Rogers Settlement
Agreement.  As of the Effective Date and pursuant to an amended
escrow agreement, if the Company does not pay the full amount due
on or before Aug. 17, 2015, the escrow will continue until
Aug. 27, 2015, during which time the Company may make all payments
owed to Rogers.  In the event that the Company has still not made
all the required payments to Rogers by Aug. 27, 2015, then all of
the Assets will be returned to Lucas Energy, Inc.  The
aforementioned Lucas Energy share volume of 44,069 represents
shares resulting from the Lucas Energy, Inc. reverse stock split on
July 15, 2015.

                        About Victory Energy

Austin, Texas-based Victory Energy Corporation is engaged in the
exploration, acquisition, development and exploitation of domestic
oil and gas properties.  Current operations are primarily located
onshore in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma.

Victory Energy reported a net loss of $4.22 million in 2014
following a net loss of $2.11 million in 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, Victory Energy had $2.40 million in total
assets, $3.50 million in total liabilities and a $1.1 million total
stockholders' deficit.

Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P., in Houston, Texas, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company has
experienced recurring losses since its inception and has an
accumulated deficit, which raise substantial doubt regarding the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


VICTORY MEDICAL: Court Hearing on Asset Sale Set for July 28
------------------------------------------------------------
Victory Medical Center Mid-Cities LP announced that the final
hearing to consider the sale of assets of the company and its
affiliates has been moved to July 28.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Russell Nelms earlier approved a bidding
process that allowed the companies to sell most of their assets at
a bankruptcy auction.  The assets do not include accounts
receivable.

Victory Medical set a July 14 deadline for bidders to make an offer
and a July 17 auction for the assets, court filings show.  Results
of the auction are not yet available.  

Last month, Victory Medical's unsecured creditor L2 Surgical LLC
and the U.S. trustee overseeing its bankruptcy case expressed their
opposition to the timetable initially proposed by the company.

Both argued that imposing "shortened deadlines" would chill rather
than encourage competitive bidding.
   
The bidding procedures also drew opposition from the company's
secured creditors, including Texas Capital Bank NA, Bank of the
West, and Primedia Group LLC.

Texas Capital questioned the absence of a provision allowing
secured creditors to purchase the assets by use of a so-called
credit bid.

Bank of the West criticized the lack of information about the
assets to be sold while Primedia Group opposed the payment to other
creditors from the proceeds of sale of equipment located at Victory
Medical's facility in Plano, Texas.

Primedia Group also complained that Victory Medical has not yet
issued a notice regarding the results of the auction.    

Victory Medical also received an objection from its supplier
Alliance Partners LLC.  Alliance Partners criticized the lack of
transparency and the limited amount of time given to creditors who
wanted to participate in the sale process.   

               About Victory Healthcare

Victory Parent Company, LLC, and 8 affiliated companies sought
Chapter 11 protection in Fort Worth, Texas (Bankr. N.D. Tex.) on
June 12, 2015, in Ft. Worth, Texas.

Headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas, Victory Parent Company
manages six medical centers in Texas.  Founded in 2005, Victory now
maintains medical centers offering emergency room services in
through Victory Medical Center Mid-Cities in Hurst, Victory Medical
Center Plano, Victory Medical Center Craig Ranch in McKinney, and
Victory Medical Center Landmark in San Antonio. The company also
manages its Victory Medical Center Beaumont and Houston-East, which
are not part of the Chapter 11 filing and will be sold separately.

The Debtors tapped Hoover Slovacek, LLP, as counsel; Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, as claims agent; and Baker, Donelson,
Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, as special counsel.


VIGGLE INC: Expects Fiscal 2015 Revenue to Increase More Than 40%
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Viggle Inc. expects its fiscal 2015 full-year revenue for the
period ended June 30, 2015, will be approximately $25.6 million,
and approximately $6.9 million for the fiscal fourth quarter,
representing a 42% and 30% increase over the prior year and
quarter, respectively.  The Company also expects to report an
Adjusted EBITDA loss for fiscal 2015 of approximately $29.6
million, and approximately $6.2 million for the fiscal fourth
quarter.  The Company expects to report full-year financial results
no later than Sept. 28, 2015.

John Small, chief financial officer of Viggle, said, "Increased
advertising on the Viggle app led to our substantial growth in
revenue this quarter.  Our aggressive and consistent marketing
efforts over the past year helped to drive those advertising
revenues to the current levels.  Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter
improved year-over-year, but decreased for the full year because of
those increased marketing expenses."

Key metrics for the fiscal fourth quarter ended June 30, 2015,
were:

   * Average monthly total reach for F4Q 2015 was 23.6 million,
     compared with 17.7 million in the year-ago quarter, a 33%
     increase, and 25.7 million for the quarter ended March 31,
     2015.

   * Average active reach in the quarter was 10.2 million compared

     with 6.4 million for F4Q 2014, an increase of 60%, and
     compared with 10.6 million in F3Q 2015.

   * Almost 600,000 new users registered on the Viggle platform,
     bringing net registered users to more than 9.5 million,
     compared with 5.4 million net registered users as of the end
     of the year-ago fourth quarter, an increase of 78 percent.

   * As of June 30, 2015, Viggle users have cumulatively checked
     into more than 504 million TV programs and matched more than
     188 million songs using the Viggle Music service.  Overall,
     users' average time in the Viggle app has been nearly 65
     minutes per session.

   * As of June 30, 2015, users have cumulatively redeemed more
     than 64 billion points for approximately 5 million rewards,
     an average of 12,940 points per reward redemption.  The total

     retail value of rewards redeemed through June 30, 2015, is
     approximately $26 million.

                           About Viggle

New York City-based Viggle Inc. is a loyalty marketing company.
The Company has developed a loyalty program for television that
gives people real rewards for checking into the television shows
they are watching on most mobile operating system.  Viggle users
can redeem their points in the app's rewards catalog for items
such as movie tickets, music, or gift cards.

Viggle reported a net loss of $68.4 million on $18 million of
revenues for the year ended June 30, 2014, compared with a net
loss of $91.4 million on $13.9 million of revenues for the year
ended June 30, 2013.

The Company's balance sheet at March 31, 2015, showed $70.9 million
in total assets, $54.6 million in total liabilities, $11.4 million
in series C convertible redeemable preferred stock, and
stockholders' equity of $4.88 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in New York, issued a "going concern" qualification
on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
June 30, 2014.  The independent auditors noted that the Company
has suffered recurring losses from operations and at June 30,
2014, has a deficiency in working capital that raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


VIRTUAL PIGGY: Issues $250,200 of Promissory Notes
--------------------------------------------------
Virtual Piggy, Inc., disclosed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that it issued $250,200 aggregate principal amount of
unsecured promissory notes to certain accredited investors pursuant
to Promissory Note Agreements.  The notes issued consist of (i)
$200,200 aggregate principal amount of unsecured promissory notes
and (ii) $50,000 aggregate principal amount of unsecured promissory
notes.  

Each purchaser of Notes also received a two-year Warrant to
purchase a number of shares of common stock equal to approximately
twenty percent of the principal amount invested at an exercise
price of $0.90 per share, resulting in the issuance in the
aggregate of Warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of Company common
stock.

The Notes bear interest at a rate of 10% per annum and mature on
the six month anniversary of the issuance date, or on such earlier
date that (i) the Company completes the closing of a specified
joint venture agreement or (ii) the Company completes the sale of
at least an additional $1 million of 10% Secured Convertible
Promissory Notes.  As an additional inducement, the purchasers of
Class A Unsecured Notes only will receive, on the Maturity Date, a
commitment fee equal to seven and one-half percent (7.5%) of the
original principal amount.

                 About Oink (Virtual Piggy, Inc.)

Virtual Piggy is the provider of Oink, a secure online and in-store
teen wallet.  Oink enables teens to manage and spend money within
parental controls, while gaining valuable financial management
skills.  The technology company also delivers payment platforms
designed for the Under 21 age group in the global market, and
enables online businesses the ability to function in a manner
consistent with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act and
similar international children's privacy laws.  The company, based
in Hermosa Beach, CA, is on the Web at: http://www.oink.com/and
holds three technology patents, US Patent No. 8,762,230, 8,650,621
and 8,812,395.

Virtual Piggy reported a net loss of $9.65 million in 2014, a net
loss of $16 million in 2013 and a net loss of $12.03 million in
2012.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $2.64 million in total
assets, $3.88 million in total liabilities, all current, and a
$1.23 million stockholders' deficit.

Morison Cogen LLP, in Bala Cynwyd, PA, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company's losses from
development stage activities raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.


VIRTUAL PIGGY: Scott McPherson Returns as CFO
---------------------------------------------
Virtual Piggy, Inc. announced that Scott McPherson, the original
CFO of Virtual Piggy, has returned to take over the CFO position
full-time.  Scott McPherson, CPA, CFE, CVA, brings with him 20
years of CFO experience with private and public companies.

"Scott has stayed connected to Virtual Piggy over the last two
years and knows our business inside out," said Dr. Jo Webber, CEO
and Founder of Virtual Piggy.  "We are thrilled to have Scott back
managing the financial operations of our business."

"Virtual Piggy has evolved over the last 3 years and I am returning
at a pivotal point," said Scott McPherson.  "I am very excited to
return to the financial helm during this key point in time."

                  About Oink (Virtual Piggy, Inc.)

Virtual Piggy is the provider of Oink, a secure online and in-store
teen wallet.  Oink enables teens to manage and spend money within
parental controls, while gaining valuable financial management
skills.  The technology company also delivers payment platforms
designed for the Under 21 age group in the global market, and
enables online businesses the ability to function in a manner
consistent with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act and
similar international children's privacy laws.  The company, based
in Hermosa Beach, CA, is on the Web at: http://www.oink.com/and
holds three technology patents, US Patent No. 8,762,230, 8,650,621
and 8,812,395.

Virtual Piggy reported a net loss of $9.65 million in 2014, a net
loss of $16 million in 2013 and a net loss of $12.03 million in
2012.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $2.64 million in total
assets, $3.88 million in total liabilities, all current, and a
$1.23 million stockholders' deficit.

Morison Cogen LLP, in Bala Cynwyd, PA, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company's losses from
development stage activities raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.


VISTEON CORP: Not Prevented by ERISA to Cut OPEB, Del. Court Rules
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Richard G. Andrews of the United States District Court for
District of Delaware found that the International Union, United
Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of
America ("UAW") has no cause of action against Visteon Corporation
for a breach of contract or a violation of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act, even when viewing the facts and inferences in
the light most favorable to UAW.  Accordingly, Judge Andrews ruled
that Visteon has demonstrated that it is entitled to judgment on
the pleadings.

Judge Andrews accepts the preclusive effect of the Bankruptcy
Court's determination that the post-employment health care and life
insurance benefits of given by Visteon to Dolores Gromalski and
Pablo Gomez, for themselves and other retired workers of Visteon's
North-Penn and Caribbean plants, were not vested; consequently,
ERISA does not prevent Visteon from unilaterally terminating those
benefits.  UAW's claim for a violation of 29 U.S.C. Section
1132(a)(1)(B) fails as a matter of law, Judge Andrews ruled.

The case is INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND
AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW); and DOLORES
GROMALSKI and PABLO GOMEZ, for themselves and others similarly
situated, Plaintiffs, v. VISTEON CORPORATION; VISTEON SYSTEMS, LLC;
VISTEON CARIBBEAN, INC.; VISTEON SYSTEMS LLC HEALTH AND WELFARE
BENEFIT PLAN FOR HOURLY EMPLOYEES-NORTH PENN LOCATION; and VISTEON
CARIBBEAN, INC. EMPLOYEE GROUP INSURANCE PLAN, Defendants, Civil
Action No. 13-1742-RGA, (D. Del.).

A full-text copy of Judge Richard G. Andrews' Memorandum Opinion
dated July 9, 2015, is available at http://is.gd/fXk6oPfrom
Leagle.com.
Susan E. Kaufman, Esq. -- skaufman@coochtaylor.com -- of COOCH and
TAYLOR P.A. and John G. Adam, Esq. -- jga@legghioisrael.com -- of
LEGGHIO & ISRAEL, P.C. serve as counsel for Plaintiffs

Laura Davis Jones, Esq. -- ljones@pszjlaw.com -- and James E.
O'Neill, Esq. -- joneill@pszjlaw.com -- of PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL &
JONES LLP; Andrew B. Bloomer, Esq. -- andrew.bloomer@kirkland.com
-- Catherine L. Fitzpatrick, Esq. --
catherine.fitzpatrick@kirkland.com -- R. Allan Pixton, Esq. --
allan.pixton@kirkland.com -- and Heather A. Bloom, Esq. --
heather.bloom@kirkland.com -- of KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP serve as
counsel for Defendants

                       About Visteon Corp

Headquartered in Van Buren Township, Michigan, Visteon Corporation
(NYSE: VC) -- http://www.visteon.com/-- is an automotive supplier
that designs, engineers and manufactures innovative climate,
interior, electronic and lighting products for automakers.  The
Company has corporate offices in Van Buren Township, Michigan
U.S.); Shanghai, China; and Kerpen, Germany.  It has facilities in
27 countries and employs roughly 35,500 people.  The Company
disclosed assets of US$4,561,000,000 and debts of US$5,311,000,000
as of March 31, 2009.

Visteon Corporation and 30 of its affiliates filed for Chapter 11
protection on May 28, 2009, (Bank. D. Del. Case No. 09-11786
through 09-11818).  Judge Christopher S. Sontchi oversees the
Chapter 11 cases.  James H.M. Sprayregen, Esq., Marc Kieselstein,
Esq., and James J. Mazza, Jr., Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in
Chicago, Illinois, represented the Debtors in their restructuring
effort.  Laura Davis Jones, Esq., James E. O'Neill, Esq., Timothy
P. Cairns, Esq., and Mark M. Billion, Esq., at Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP, in Wilmington, Delaware, served as the Debtors'
local counsel.  The Debtors' investment banker and financial
advisors were Rothschild Inc.  The Debtors' notice, claims, and
solicitation agent was Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC.  The
Debtors' restructuring advisor was Alvarez & Marsal North America,
LLC.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order on Aug. 31, 2010, confirming
the Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Visteon Corporation and
its debtor-affiliates.  Visteon emerged from Chapter 11 on Oct. 1.


VYCOR MEDICAL: Amends Form S-1 Prospectus with SEC
--------------------------------------------------
In accordance with its contractual commitment with the investors in
Vycor Medical, Inc.'s 2014 Units offering which had its final
closing on April 25, 2014, the Company filed a post-effective
amendment to its previously filed Registration Statement on Form
S-1 which was declared effective on June 10, 2014.

The Post-Effective Amendment covers shares issuable on the exercise
of Warrants issued in connection with the Offering.  In the
aggregate, the Post-Effective Amendment covers 3,991,202 shares
issuable on the exercise of Warrants, half of which have an
exercise price of $2.05 per share and the other half having an
exercise price of $3.08 per share.  None of the shares being
registered are currently issued and outstanding.  A full text of
the Post-Effective Amendment may be viewed at http://is.gd/Y8U8OQ

                        About Vycor Medical

Boca Raton, Fla.-based Vycor Medical, Inc. (OTC BB: VYCO)
-- http://www.VycorMedical.com/-- is a medical device company
committed to making neurological brain, spinal and other surgical
procedures safer and more effective.  The Company's flagship,
Patent Pending ViewSite(TM) Surgical Access Systems represent an
exciting new minimally invasive access and retraction system that
holds the potential for speedier, safer and more economical brain,
spinal and other surgeries and a quicker patient discharge.
Vycor's innovative medical instruments are designed to optimize
neurosurgical site access, reduce patient risk, accelerate
recovery, and add tangible value to the professional medical
community.

Vycor Medical reported a net loss of $4.04 million in 2014, a net
loss of $2.44 million in 2013 and a net loss of $2.93 million in
2012.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $3.23 million in total
assets, $881,000 in total liabilities, all current, and $2.35
million in total stockholders' equity.


VYCOR MEDICAL: Fountainhead Reports 49.9% Stake as of June 30
-------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Fountainhead Capital Management Limited disclosed that
as of June 30, 2015, it beneficially owned 6,431,150 shares of
common stock of Vycor Medical, Inc., which represents 49.9 percent
of the shares outstanding.

On June 30, 2015, Vycor issued 8,333 shares of its Common Stock to
Fountainhead in satisfaction of $15,000 of consulting fees due for
the quarter ended June 30, 2015.  As a result of that issue,
Fountainhead's previously-reporting holdings of Vycor Common Stock
(including shares which it has the option to acquire within 60 days
of that date) were increased to a total of 6,431,150 shares,
comprising ownership of 4,383,329 Vycor Common Shares and Warrants
to purchase 2,047,821 Vycor Common Shares as follows:

   -- 343,411 shares at an exercise price of $1.88 per share prior
      to Aug. 4, 2017;

   -- 397,140 shares at an exercise price of $2.05 per share prior
      Jan. 2, 2017;

   -- 337,517 shares at an exercise price of $2.62 per share prior
      to Aug. 4, 2017;

   -- 397,140 shares at an exercise price of $3.08 per share prior
      to Jan. 2, 2017; and

   -- 572,613 shares at an exercise price of $3.08 per share prior
      to Aug. 4, 2017.

A copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                      http://is.gd/DwGZcQ

                       About Vycor Medical

Boca Raton, Fla.-based Vycor Medical, Inc. (OTC BB: VYCO)
-- http://www.VycorMedical.com/-- is a medical device company
committed to making neurological brain, spinal and other surgical
procedures safer and more effective.  The Company's flagship,
Patent Pending ViewSite(TM) Surgical Access Systems represent an
exciting new minimally invasive access and retraction system that
holds the potential for speedier, safer and more economical brain,
spinal and other surgeries and a quicker patient discharge.
Vycor's innovative medical instruments are designed to optimize
neurosurgical site access, reduce patient risk, accelerate
recovery, and add tangible value to the professional medical
community.

Vycor Medical reported a net loss of $4.04 million in 2014, a net
loss of $2.44 million in 2013 and a net loss of $2.93 million in
2012.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $3.23 million in total
assets, $881,000 in total liabilities, all current, and $2.35
million in total stockholders' equity.


WANDA TORRENCE: Complaint Against Comcast Dismissed
---------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Jack B. Schmetter dismissed the complaint
captioned Wanda E. Torrence, Plaintiff, v. Comcast Corporation,
Defendant, ADVERSARY NO. 15-AP-291 (Bankr. N.D. Ill., Eastern
Div.).

After trial in a prior adversary proceeding filed by debtor Wanda
E. Torrence against Comcast for violation of automatic stay when
Comcast continued to bill her after she filed for bankruptcy,
judgment was entered against Comcast for $36.28 in compensatory
damages, and $181.40 in punitive damages. Comcast was issued a
satisfaction of judgment when it issued Torrence a credit on her
bill for those amounts.

Torrence filed another adversary proceeding against Comcast on
these counts: (i) violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act, (ii) violation of discharge injunction, (iii) violation of the
Fair Credit Billing Act, (iv) intentional infliction of emotional
distress, (v) breach of contract, (vi) fraud, and (vii) violation
of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Comcast filed a motion to dismiss
under Rule 12(b)(6) F.R. Civ. P.

Judge Schmetter dismissed Count II of Torrence's complaint for
failure to state a claim. Judge Schmetter held that while Comcast
was found in violation of the automatic stay for attempting to
collect $36.28 for pre-petition charges, it has already satisfied
that judgment.

All other counts were also dismissed for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction as these do not arise under, arise in, nor are related
to cases under Chapter 11.

A copy of the June 26, 2015 memorandum opinion is available at
http://is.gd/4crSfbfrom Leagle.com.

Wanda E. Torrence filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 (Bankr. N.D.
Ill. Case No. 14-BK-34470) on September 23, 2014.


WASHINGTON HEIGHTS: Meeting of Creditors Scheduled for July 27
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 will convene a meeting of creditors
in the Chapter 11 cases of Washington Heights Parking, LLC, on July
27, 2015, at 2:00 p.m.

                     About Washington Heights

Washington Heights Parking, LLC, one of 20 companies owned by real
estate developer Jose Espinal, sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-11687) in Manhattan on June 26, 2015.

Washington Heights Parking, a real estate business, owns a building
at 4320 Broadway, New York.  It leases the premises to three
tenants who pay annualized rents of approximately $1.4 million.



WHISKEY ONE: Aug. 13 Hearing on Bid to Dismiss Ch. 11 Case
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge David E. Rice of the U.S Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Maryland will convene a hearing on August 13, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.,
to consider FAIRMD, LLC's motion to dismiss the Chapter 11 case of
Whiskey One Eight, LLC.

            About Whiskey One Eight

Whiskey One Eight, LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 15-19885) on July 15, 2015.  Andrew Zois
signed the petition as managing member.  The Debtor estimated
assets of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities of at least
$1
million.

Lawrence Joseph Yumkas, Esq., at Yumkas, Vedmar & Sweeney, LLC as
the Debtor's counsel.  Judge David E. Rice presides over the case.




WPCS INTERNATIONAL: John Stetson Reports 9.9% Stake as of July 23
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, John Stetson and HS Contrarian Investments, LLC
disclosed that as of July 23, 2015, they beneficially owned 219,095
shares of common stock of WPCS International Incorporated, which
represents 9.99% (based on 2,174,049 shares of common stock
outstanding as of July 20, 2015).  A copy of the regulatory filing
is available at http://is.gd/bR5Bt6

             About WPCS International Incorporated

WPCS -- http://www.wpcs.com/-- operates in two business segments
including: (1) providing communications infrastructure contracting
services to the public services, healthcare, energy and corporate
enterprise markets worldwide; and (2) developing a Bitcoin trading
platform.

WPCS International incurred a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $11.2 million for the year ended April 30, 2014,
as compared with a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$6.91 million for the year ended April 30, 2013.

As of Jan. 31, 2015, the Company had $14.8 million in total assets,
$14.8 million in total liabilities and a $36,000 total deficit.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended April 30, 2014.  The independent auditing firm
noted that the Company has incurred significant losses and needs
to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


WPCS INTERNATIONAL: Sells 288,223 Common Shares
-----------------------------------------------
WPCS International Incorporated issued 288,223 shares of its common
stock, par value $0.0001 per share, from July 10, 2015, through
July 24, 2015.

The issuances on July 23, 2015, resulted in an increase in the
number of shares of Common Stock outstanding by more than 5%
compared to the number of shares of Common Stock reported
outstanding in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 10, 2015.  The
Company has issued a total of 1,541,632 shares of Common Stock to
holders of its Series F, F-1, G, G-1 and Series H Convertible
Preferred Stock upon the conversion of shares of Series F, F-1,G,
G-1 and Series H Convertible Preferred Stock.  The shares of Common
Stock issued upon the conversion of shares of Series F, F-1, G, G-1
and Series H Convertible Preferred Stock were issued in reliance
upon the exemption from registration in Section 3(a)(9) of the
Securities Act of 1933.  As of July 24, 2015, the Company has
2,174,049 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

              About WPCS International Incorporated

WPCS -- http://www.wpcs.com/-- operates in two business segments
including: (1) providing communications infrastructure contracting
services to the public services, healthcare, energy and corporate
enterprise markets worldwide; and (2) developing a Bitcoin trading
platform.

WPCS International incurred a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $11.2 million for the year ended April 30, 2014,
as compared with a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$6.91 million for the year ended April 30, 2013.

As of Jan. 31, 2015, the Company had $14.8 million in total assets,
$14.8 million in total liabilities and a $36,000 total deficit.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended April 30, 2014.  The independent auditing firm
noted that the Company has incurred significant losses and needs
to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


XINERGY LTD: Settles Rights to $3MM in Escrowed Funds
-----------------------------------------------------
Xinergy Ltd., et al., ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Virginia, Roanoke Division, to approve a proposed
division of the funds remaining in an escrow account.

On February 1, 2013, Xinergy Corp. sold its mining operations
located in Bell, Leslie, Harlan, Clay and Knox Counties, Kentucky
to Straight Creek.  In connection with the sale, Xinergy Corp. and
Straight Creek entered into the Escrow Agreement in order to
establish an escrow account.  Straight Creek deposited $3,000,000
into the Escrow Account.

The proposed settlement would divide the remaining proceeds in the
Escrow Account, with $375,000 being paid to Straight Creek and the
remaining amount of approximately $120,000 being paid to the
Debtors.  Following the release of these funds from the Escrow
Account, there will be no remaining funds held in the Escrow
Account and the account can be closed.

The Debtors are represented by:

          Tyler P. Brown (VSB No. 28072)
          Henry P. (Toby) Long, III (VSB No. 75134)
          Justin F. Paget (VSB No. 77949)
          HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
          Riverfront Plaza, East Tower
          951 East Byrd Street
          Richmond, Virginia 23219
          Telephone: (804) 788-8200
          Facsimile: (804) 788-8218
          Email: tpbrown@hunton.com
                 hlong@hunton.com
                 jpaget@hunton.com

                         About Xinergy Ltd.

Xinergy is a U.S. producer of metallurgical and thermal coal with
mineral reserves, mining operations and coal properties located in
the Central Appalachian ("CAPP") regions of West Virginia and
Virginia.  Xinergy's operations principally include two active
mining complexes known as South Fork and Raven Crest located in
Greenbrier and Boone Counties, West Virginia.  Xinergy also leases
or owns the mineral rights to properties located in Fayette,
Nicholas and Greenbrier Counties, West Virginia and Wise County,
Virginia. Collectively, Xinergy leases or owns mineral rights to
approximately 72,000 acres with proven and probable coal reserves
of approximately 77 million tons and additional estimated reserves
of 40 million tons.

Xinergy Ltd. and 25 subsidiaries commenced Chapter 11 bankruptcy
cases (Bankr. W.D. Va. Lead Case No. 15-70444) on April 6, 2015.
The cases have been assigned to Judge Paul M. Black.  The cases are
being jointly administered for procedural purposes.

Xinergy Ltd. disclosed $36,968,445 in assets and $215,000,000 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtors tapped Hunton & Williams LLP as attorneys; Global
Hunter Securities, as financial advisor, and American Legal Claims
Services, LLC as claims, noticing and balloting agent.

The U.S. Trustee appointed a two member official committee of
unsecured creditors.  The Committee tapped to retain McGuireWoods
LLP as lead counsel, and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP as its
local counsel.


Z TRIM HOLDINGS: Signs Purchase Agreement with Fordham
------------------------------------------------------
Z Trim Holdings, Inc., on July 17, 2015, entered into an equipment
purchase agreement with Fordham Capital Partners, LLC pursuant to
which the Company sold all of its right, title and interest in
certain equipment to Fordham for a purchase price of $500,000.  

Concurrently with entering into the Purchase Agreement, the Company
entered into an equipment lease agreement with Fordham pursuant to
which the Company leased the Equipment from Fordham on terms that
included the following: a lease term of 24 months, monthly lease
payments by the Company of $15,800 and the option (at the election
of the Company) to purchase the Equipment on or after July 8, 2016
on the following terms:  (i) if the purchase date is between 12-18
months $425,000; (ii) if the purchase date is between 19-23 months:
$360,000; and (iii) if the purchase date is during the 24th month
(but no later than July 8, 2017): $325,000.

The Equipment Lease Agreement includes customary events of default,
including non-payment by the Company of the monthly lease payments
and the payment of penalties upon those late payments.  The Company
intends to utilize the proceeds from the sale of the Equipment for
working capital purposes.

In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company's Factoring
Agreement with Fordham effective May 28, 2015, as amended by an
amendment dated June 25, 2015, was further amended to grant to
Fordham a security interest in all of the collateral under such
agreement to secure the payment to Fordham of all rent payments and
all other amounts owed by the Company to Fordham under the
Equipment Lease Agreement.

                           About Z Trim

Mundelein, Ill.-based Z Trim Holdings, Inc., is a functional food
ingredient company which provides custom product solutions that
help answer the food industry's problems.  Z Trim's revolutionary
technology provides value-added ingredients across virtually all
food industry categories.  Z Trim's all-natural products, among
other things, help to reduce fat and calories, add fiber, provide
shelf-stability, prevent oil migration, and add binding capacity
-- all without degrading the taste and texture of the final food
products.

Z Trim Holdings reported a net loss of $5.57 million in 2014,
following a net loss of $13.4 million in 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $2.03 million in total
assets, $4.47 million in total liabilities and a $2.43 million
total stockholders' deficit.

M&K CPAS, PLLC, in Houston, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company does not have
enough cash on hand to meet its current liabilities and has had
reoccurring losses as of Dec. 31, 2014.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.


ZOGENIX INC: Millennium Mgmt. Reports 5.6% Stake as of July 22
--------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Millennium Management LLCand Israel A. Englander
disclosed that as of July 22, 2015, they beneficially owned
1,082,670 shares of common stock of Zogenix, Inc., which represents
5.6 percent of the shares outstanding, which percentage was
calculated based on 19,185,000 shares of the Issuer's Common Stock
outstanding as per the Issuer's Company Overview dated July 2015.
A copy of the regulatory filing is available for free at:

                        http://is.gd/EsobCX

                         About Zogenix Inc.

Zogenix, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZGNX), with offices in San Diego and
Emeryville, California, is a pharmaceutical company
commercializing and developing products for the treatment of
central nervous system disorders and pain.

Zogenix reported net income of $8.58 million in 2014 following a
net loss of $80.85 million in 2013.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had $180 million in total assets,
$146 million in total liabilities, and $34.3 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Ernst & Young LLP, in San Diego, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, citing that the Company's
recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from
operating activities raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week From July 20 to 24, 2015
-------------------------------------------------------
  Company               Ticker  Coupon Bid Price  Maturity Date
  -------               ------  ------ ---------  -------------
A-S Co-Issuer
  Subsidiary Inc /
  A-S Merger Sub LLC    ALIANT   7.875   106.050     12/15/2020
A-S Co-Issuer
  Subsidiary Inc /
  A-S Merger Sub LLC    ALIANT   7.875   106.351     12/15/2020
Affinion
  Investments LLC       AFFINI  13.500    45.750      8/15/2018
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc         ANR      6.000     4.500       6/1/2019
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc         ANR      9.750     3.578      4/15/2018
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc         ANR      6.250     4.500       6/1/2021
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc         ANR      7.500    18.250       8/1/2020
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc         ANR      3.750     2.500     12/15/2017
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc         ANR      4.875     5.750     12/15/2020
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc         ANR      7.500    20.000       8/1/2020
Alpha Natural
  Resources Inc         ANR      7.500    25.500       8/1/2020
Altegrity Inc           USINV   14.000    52.250       7/1/2020
Altegrity Inc           USINV   13.000    48.000       7/1/2020
Altegrity Inc           USINV   14.000    35.000       7/1/2020
American Eagle
  Energy Corp           AMZG    11.000    35.000       9/1/2019
American Eagle
  Energy Corp           AMZG    11.000    35.500       9/1/2019
Arch Coal Inc           ACI      7.000    10.511      6/15/2019
Arch Coal Inc           ACI      7.250    15.050      10/1/2020
Arch Coal Inc           ACI      7.250    10.375      6/15/2021
Arch Coal Inc           ACI      9.875    13.330      6/15/2019
Arch Coal Inc           ACI      8.000    14.875      1/15/2019
Arch Coal Inc           ACI      8.000    21.280      1/15/2019
Avon Products Inc       AVP      3.125   100.000      3/15/2016
BPZ Resources Inc       BPZR     8.500     7.125      10/1/2017
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR     10.000    31.000     12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR     10.750    29.500       2/1/2016
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR      6.500    40.000       6/1/2016
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR     12.750    32.000      4/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR      5.750    40.000      10/1/2017
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR     10.000    28.500     12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR      5.750    12.250      10/1/2017
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR     10.000    31.125     12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR     10.000    31.125     12/15/2018
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR     10.750    29.125       2/1/2016
Caesars Entertainment
  Operating Co Inc      CZR     10.000    30.875     12/15/2018
Cal Dive
  International Inc     CDVI     5.000     1.000      7/15/2017
Champion
  Enterprises Inc       CHB      2.750     0.250      11/1/2037
Chassix Holdings Inc    CHASSX  10.000     8.000     12/15/2018
Chassix Holdings Inc    CHASSX  10.000     8.000     12/15/2018
Chassix Holdings Inc    CHASSX  10.000     8.000     12/15/2018
Claire's Stores Inc     CLE      8.875    41.790      3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc     CLE      7.750    34.000       6/1/2020
Claire's Stores Inc     CLE     10.500    61.250       6/1/2017
Cliffs Natural
  Resources Inc         CLF      5.950    50.250      1/15/2018
Cliffs Natural
  Resources Inc         CLF      5.900    31.300      3/15/2020
Colt Defense LLC /
  Colt Finance Corp     CLTDEF   8.750    28.030     11/15/2017
Colt Defense LLC /
  Colt Finance Corp     CLTDEF   8.750    30.500     11/15/2017
Colt Defense LLC /
  Colt Finance Corp     CLTDEF   8.750    30.500     11/15/2017
Comstock Resources Inc  CRK      7.750    33.500       4/1/2019
Comstock Resources Inc  CRK      9.500    36.000      6/15/2020
Dendreon Corp           DNDN     2.875    69.000      1/15/2016
EPL Oil & Gas Inc       EXXI     8.250    47.529      2/15/2018
EXCO Resources Inc      XCO      7.500    44.150      9/15/2018
Endeavour
  International Corp    END     12.000    11.500       3/1/2018
Endeavour
  International Corp    END     12.000     9.500       3/1/2018
Endeavour
  International Corp    END     12.000     9.500       3/1/2018
Energy & Exploration
  Partners Inc          ENEXPR   8.000    19.875       7/1/2019
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc           ENER     3.000     7.875      6/15/2013
Energy Future
  Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc      TXU     10.000     1.875      12/1/2020
Energy Future
  Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc      TXU     10.000     1.875      12/1/2020
Energy XXI Gulf
  Coast Inc             EXXI     9.250    38.725     12/15/2017
Energy XXI
  Gulf Coast Inc        EXXI     7.500    20.875     12/15/2021
Energy XXI
  Gulf Coast Inc        EXXI     7.750    22.430      6/15/2019
FBOP Corp               FBOPCP  10.000     1.843      1/15/2009
FairPoint
  Communications
  Inc/Old               FRP     13.125     1.879       4/2/2018
Federal Farm
  Credit Banks          FFCB     2.650    99.825      7/28/2021
Federal Home
  Loan Banks            FHLB     0.530   100.000     10/28/2016
Federal Home
  Loan Banks            FHLB     1.125   100.005      1/29/2018
Federal Home
  Loan Banks            FHLB     0.550   100.000     10/28/2016
Federal National
  Mortgage Association  FNMA     2.000   100.000      1/30/2020
Federal National
  Mortgage Association  FNMA     1.350   100.035      7/30/2018
Federal National
  Mortgage Association  FNMA     2.000   100.015      1/30/2020
Federal National
  Mortgage Association  FNMA     1.750   100.013      7/30/2020
Federal National
  Mortgage Association  FNMA     1.000   100.005      1/30/2018
Federal National
  Mortgage Association  FNMA     2.000   100.015      1/30/2020
Federal National
  Mortgage Association  FNMA     1.250   100.007      7/30/2018
Federal National
  Mortgage Association  FNMA     1.125   100.006      1/30/2018
Federal National
  Mortgage Association  FNMA     2.210   100.016      7/30/2020
First Tennessee
  Capital II            FHN      6.300    93.000      4/15/2034
Fleetwood
  Enterprises Inc       FLTW    14.000     3.557     12/15/2011
GT Advanced
  Technologies Inc      GTAT     3.000    24.500      10/1/2017
Gevo Inc                GEVO     7.500    59.500       7/1/2022
Goodrich
  Petroleum Corp        GDP      8.875    25.050      3/15/2019
Goodrich
  Petroleum Corp        GDP      5.000    42.500      10/1/2032
Gymboree Corp/The       GYMB     9.125    36.500      12/1/2018
Hercules Offshore Inc   HERO     8.750    30.500      7/15/2021
Hercules Offshore Inc   HERO    10.250    32.500       4/1/2019
Hercules Offshore Inc   HERO     8.750    34.000      7/15/2021
Hercules Offshore Inc   HERO    10.250    30.500       4/1/2019
JPMorgan Chase & Co     JPM      6.000    99.773       5/1/2029
James River Coal Co     JRCC     3.125     0.001      3/15/2018
Las Vegas Monorail Co   LASVMC   5.500     0.010      7/15/2019
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc          LEH      5.000     9.000       2/7/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc          LEH      4.000     9.000      4/30/2009
MBIA Global
  Funding LLC           MBI      0.338    99.930      7/31/2015
MF Global Holdings Ltd  MF       6.250    15.000       8/8/2016
MF Global Holdings Ltd  MF       3.375    15.000       8/1/2018
MF Global Holdings Ltd  MF       9.000    15.000      6/20/2038
MModal Inc              MODL    10.750    10.125      8/15/2020
Magnetation LLC /
  Mag Finance Corp      MAGNTN  11.000    31.000      5/15/2018
Magnetation LLC /
  Mag Finance Corp      MAGNTN  11.000    24.875      5/15/2018
Magnetation LLC /
  Mag Finance Corp      MAGNTN  11.000    24.875      5/15/2018
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC      MPO     10.750    35.250      10/1/2020
Molycorp Inc            MCP     10.000    15.875       6/1/2020
Molycorp Inc            MCP      6.000     1.740       9/1/2017
Nine West Holdings Inc  JNY      6.875    35.000      3/15/2019
Noranda Aluminum
  Acquisition Corp      NOR     11.000    34.000       6/1/2019
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC    OMX      5.540    17.250      1/29/2020
Peabody Energy Corp     BTU      6.000    30.750     11/15/2018
Peabody Energy Corp     BTU      6.250    21.780     11/15/2021
Peabody Energy Corp     BTU      6.500    24.000      9/15/2020
Peabody Energy Corp     BTU      4.750     9.950     12/15/2041
Penn Virginia Resource
  Partners LP /
  Penn Virginia
  Resource
  Finance Corp          ETP      6.500   107.500      5/15/2021
Powerwave
  Technologies Inc      PWAV     2.750     0.125      7/15/2041
Powerwave
  Technologies Inc      PWAV     1.875     0.125     11/15/2024
Powerwave
  Technologies Inc      PWAV     1.875     0.125     11/15/2024
Quicksilver
  Resources Inc         KWKA     9.125    10.000      8/15/2019
Quicksilver
  Resources Inc         KWKA    11.000    12.500       7/1/2021
Quiksilver Inc /
  QS Wholesale Inc      ZQK     10.000    24.827       8/1/2020
RadioShack Corp         RSH      6.750     0.750      5/15/2019
RadioShack Corp         RSH      6.750     0.821      5/15/2019
RadioShack Corp         RSH      6.750     0.821      5/15/2019
Sabine Oil & Gas Corp   SOGC     7.250    23.500      6/15/2019
Sabine Oil & Gas Corp   SOGC     9.750    16.938      2/15/2017
Sabine Oil & Gas Corp   SOGC     7.500    23.500      9/15/2020
Sabine Oil & Gas Corp   SOGC     7.500    21.000      9/15/2020
Sabine Oil & Gas Corp   SOGC     7.500    21.000      9/15/2020
SandRidge Energy Inc    SD       7.500    30.000      3/15/2021
SandRidge Energy Inc    SD       8.750    33.000      1/15/2020
Saratoga Resources Inc  SARA    12.500     7.750       7/1/2016
SquareTwo
  Financial Corp        SQRTW   11.625    55.000       4/1/2017
Swift Energy Co         SFY      7.125    41.075       6/1/2017
Swift Energy Co         SFY      7.875    22.000       3/1/2022
Swift Energy Co         SFY      8.875    25.000      1/15/2020
TMST Inc                THMR     8.000    12.000      5/15/2013
Terrestar Networks Inc  TSTR     6.500    10.000      6/15/2014
Texas Competitive
  Electric Holdings
  Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc           TXU     15.000    14.000       4/1/2021
Texas Competitive
  Electric Holdings
  Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc           TXU     10.500    12.188      11/1/2016
Texas Competitive
  Electric Holdings
  Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc           TXU     15.000    12.250       4/1/2021
Texas Competitive
  Electric Holdings
  Co LLC / TCEH
  Finance Inc           TXU     10.500    11.125      11/1/2016
US Shale Solutions Inc  SHALES  12.500    58.125       9/1/2017
US Shale Solutions Inc  SHALES  12.500    58.125       9/1/2017
Venoco Inc              VQ       8.875    22.189      2/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc       VRS     11.750    45.250      1/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc       VRS     11.750    47.250      1/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc       VRS     11.750    25.000      1/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc       VRS     11.375    45.200       8/1/2016
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc       VRS      8.750    10.150       2/1/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc       VRS     11.750    24.625      1/15/2019
Verso Paper
  Holdings LLC /
  Verso Paper Inc       VRS     11.750    24.625      1/15/2019
Walter Energy Inc       WLTG     9.875     1.250     12/15/2020
Walter Energy Inc       WLTG    11.000     3.625       4/1/2020
Walter Energy Inc       WLTG     8.500     2.000      4/15/2021
Walter Energy Inc       WLTG    11.000     5.000       4/1/2020
Walter Energy Inc       WLTG     9.875     1.358     12/15/2020
Walter Energy Inc       WLTG     9.875     1.358     12/15/2020


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2015.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***