TCR_Public/150616.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, June 16, 2015, Vol. 19, No. 167

                            Headlines

ALL OUT ENERGY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ALLIED NEVADA: Shareholders Say Disclosures Aren't Fair
AMERICAN INT'L GROUP: Greenberg Wins Moral Victory in Takeover Suit
ANNA'S LINENS: Case Summary & 19 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ANNA'S LINENS: Files Voluntary Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition

ASARCO LLC: High Court Rejects Lawyers' Claims for Defense of Fees
BION ENVIRONMENTAL: Has $1.68M Net Loss in Q3 Ended March 31
COLT DEFENSE: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
COLT DEFENSE: Proposes to Pay $11.3MM to Critical Vendors
COLT DEFENSE: Says Business As Usual During Ch. 11 Process

COLT DEFENSE: To Pursue Biz Sale in Ch.11 After Prepack Rejected
CORINTHIAN COLLEGES: Grilled Over How Co. Failed
COSTA DORADA: Case Summary & 14 Largest Unsecured Creditors
CROSS BORDER: Posts $2.46-Million Net Loss in 2014
ENERPULSE TECHNOLOGIES: Has $152K Net Income in First Quarter

EVPP LLC: Ohio Court Rules on Appeal in Eagle's View Rift
FINDEX.COM INC: Incurs $117K Net Loss for First Quarter
FREE GOSPEL: Section 341 Meeting Scheduled for July 13
FUWEI FILMS: Obtains Extension of NASDAQ Listing Compliance Period
GARB OIL: Incurs $613K Net Loss in First Quarter

GREENBRIER COS: S&P Affirms BB- Corp. Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
GROW CONDOS: Incurs $47,400 Net Loss in First Quarter
HOLDEN PSYCHIATRIC: Case Summary & 4 Largest Unsecured Creditors
L BRANDS: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' Issuer Default Rating
LIFEPOINT HEALTH: Fitch Affirms 'BB' IDR, Outlook Stable

MA LERIN HILLS: Section 341 Meeting Scheduled for July 13
MAGNETATION LLC: Court Wants Donlin Recano's Admin. Role Limited
NEW YORK MILITARY: Taps MacVean Lewis to Handle Business Matters
NIRVANA INC: Has Interim OK to Use Lenders' Cash Collateral
NOVA CHEMICALS: Fitch Raises Issuer Default Rating From 'BB+'

OCEAN SPRAY: Fitch Affirms 'BB' Rating on $150MM Preferred Stock
OXANE MATERIALS: Rejects Five Warehouse, Railcar Leases
OXANE MATERIALS: Seeks to Hire Miller Egan as Special Counsel
OXANE MATERIALS: Seeks to Tap Kilyk-Bowersox as Special Counsel
PARK 91: Taps Tarter Krinsky as General Bankruptcy Counsel

PENINSULA HOSPITAL: Trustee Seeks Late OK for LH&M to Include PNH
PETROMAROC CORP: Enters Into Waiver Agreement on Debentures
RADIOSHACK CORP: Files Bankruptcy Plan After Standard General Sale
REED AND BARTON: Court Approves $22MM Sale of Assets to Lenox Corp.
REED AND BARTON: Financo Approved as Investment Banker

RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Trust Posts Amended Beneficiary Tax Info
ROI LAND: Reports $2.62-Mil. Net Loss for 1st Quarter
SALADWORKS LLC: Centre Lane Affiliate Acquires Business
SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL: Seth Schalow OK'd as Restructuring Consultant
SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL: Shatz Schwartz OK'd as Trustee's Counsel

SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL: TechKnowledgey Approved as Trustee's Broker
SRB INTERNATIONAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SSH HOLDINGS: S&P Affirms 'B' Corporate Credit Rating
SURNA INC: Needs Additional Financing to Cover for Losses
TEXAS REGENCY: Section 341 Meeting Set for July 14

TRANSCOASTAL CORP: Reports $383K Net Loss in Q1 Ending Mar. 31
TRIMEDYNE INC: Posts $202K Net Loss in March 31 Quarter
TRINITY INDUSTRIES: Fitch Retains 'BB+' Subordinated Notes Rating
TROCOM CONSTRUCTION: June 17 Hearing on Continued Use of Cash
VICTORY MEDICAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

VICTORY MEDICL: Files for Ch. 11 to Sell Hospital to Nobilis
WAYNE COUNTY, MI: Selling Notes Amid Possibility of Bankruptcy
WP CPP: S&P Affirms 'B' Corp. Credit Rating, Outlook Remains Stable
[*] Mintz Levin's Bankruptcy Practice Recognized by Legal 500
[^] Large Companies With Insolvent Balance Sheet


                            *********

ALL OUT ENERGY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: All Out Energy Services, LLC
        634 E. Broadway #1134
        Williston, ND 58801

Case No.: 15-42370

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 12, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas (Ft. Worth)

Judge: Hon. Michael D. Lynn

Debtor's Counsel: Alice Bower, Esq.  
                  LAW OFFICE OF ALICE BOWER
                  6421 Camp Bowie Blvd, Suite 300
                  Fort Worth, TX 76116
                  Tel: (817) 737-5436
                  Fax: (817) 737-2970
                  Email: bknotice@alicebower.com

Total Assets: $1.2 million

Total Liabilities: $1.6 million

The petition was signed by Steven Britton, president.

A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb15-42370.pdf


ALLIED NEVADA: Shareholders Say Disclosures Aren't Fair
-------------------------------------------------------
Sherri Toub, a bankruptcy columnist for Bloomberg News, reported
that the official committee od equity security holders complained
that the disclosure statement explaining Allied Nevada Gold Corp.'s
Chapter 11 plan includes a "deathtrap" provision heightens the need
for full and fair disclosure.

According to the Bloomberg report, the Equity Committee
specifically points out to the provision of the Plan that would
give holders of Allied's outstanding stock a pro rata share of new
warrants if the class votes to accept.  If it rejects, the class
gets nothing, the report noted.

Dundee Securities Ltd. and Cormark Securities Inc.; LBP Holdings
Ltd.; and Westchester Fire Insurance Company; also filed objections
to the Disclosure Statement.

                        About Allied Nevada

Allied Nevada Gold Corp. ("ANV"), a Delaware corporation, is a
publicly traded U.S.-based gold and silver producer engaged in
mining, developing and exploring properties in the State of
Nevada.

ANV's common stock trades on the NYSE and the TSX.

ANV was spun off from Vista Gold Corp. in 2006 and began operations
in May 2007.  Nevada-based mining properties acquired from Vista
include the Hycroft Mine, an open-pit heap leach operation located
54 miles west of Winnemucca, Nevada.  ANV controls 75 exploration
properties throughout Nevada as of
Dec. 31, 2014.

On March 10, 2015, ANV and 13 affiliated debtors each filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware.  The Debtors have requested that their cases
be jointly administered under Case No. 15-10503.  The cases are
assigned to Judge Mary F. Walrath.

The Debtors have tapped Blank Rome LLP and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer
& Feld LLP as attorneys; FTI Consulting Inc. as financial advisor;
Moelis & Company as financial advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC as
claims and noticing agent.

ANV disclosed $941 million in total assets and $664 million in
total debt as of Dec. 31, 2014.


AMERICAN INT'L GROUP: Greenberg Wins Moral Victory in Takeover Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie Scism, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported that
Maurice R. "Hank" Greenberg, former chief executive of American
International Group, won in his legal crusade against U.S.
authorities over their takeover of the insurance giant in 2008, but
didn't win any of the $40 billion in damages he has sought.

According to the Journal, Judge Thomas C. Wheeler ruled on June 15
that the government violated the law when it took a controlling
stake in AIG in 2008, the most dramatic stretch of the financial
crisis.  Still, he accepted the government's arguments that without
a Federal Reserve bank's $85 billion loan to AIG, the company would
have filed for bankruptcy and shareholders likely would have been
left with nothing, the Journal said.

The case is Starr International Co. v. U.S., 11-cv-00779, U.S.
Court of Federal Claims (Washington).

                           About AIG

With corporate headquarters in New York, American International
Group, Inc., is an international insurance company, serving
customers in more than 130 countries.  AIG companies serve
commercial, institutional and individual customers through
property-casualty networks of any insurer. In addition, AIG
companies are providers of life insurance and retirement services.

At the height of the 2008 financial crisis, AIG experienced a
liquidity crunch when its credit ratings were downgraded below
"AA" levels by Standard & Poor's, Moody's Investors Service and
Fitch Ratings.  AIG almost collapsed under the weight of bad bets
it made insuring mortgage-backed securities.  The Company,
however, was bailed out by the Federal Reserve, but even after an
initial infusion of $85 billion, losses continued to grow.  The
later rescue packages brought the total to $182 billion, making it
the biggest federal bailout in U.S. history.  AIG sold off a
number of its businesses and other assets to pay down loans
received from the U.S. government.


ANNA'S LINENS: Case Summary & 19 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Anna's Linens, Inc.
          dba Anna's Linens
          dba Linens Outlet
          fka Anna's Linen Company
          dba Anna's
        3550 Hyland Avenue
        Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Case No.: 15-13008

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 14, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Santa Ana)

Judge: Hon. Theodor Albert

Debtor's Counsel: David B Golubchik, Esq.
                  LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & BRILL LLP
                  10250 Constellation Blvd Ste 1700
                  Los Angeles, CA 90067
                  Tel: 310-229-1234
                  Email: dbg@lnbyb.com

Estimated Assets: $50 million to $100 million

Estimated Debts: $100 million to $500 million

The petition was signed by Scott Gladstone, chief executive
officer.

List of Debtor's 19 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Welcome Industrial                   Trade Debt       $3,998,470
95 Marcus Boulevard
Deer Park, NY 11729

Shewak Lajwanti Home                 Trade Debt       $3,664,773
Fashions, Inc.
5601 Downey Road
Vernon, CA 90058

S. Lichtenberg And Co., Inc.         Trade Debt       $3,163,143
295 Fifth Ave. Suite 918
New York, NY 10016

Roind Hometex Co., Ltd Di            Trade Debt       $2,808,765
91 Z Zhengxing Road
Luoshe Town
Wu Xi Jiangsu , 214187
CHINA

Chf Industries, Inc.                 Trade Debt       $2,783,195
One Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016

P And A Marketing                    Trade Debt       $1,986,846
34 Crest Hollow Lane
Albertson, NY 11507

Beatrice Home Fashions, Inc.         Trade Debt       $1,801,169
151 Helen Street
South Plainfield, NJ 07080

Vara Home


ANNA'S LINENS: Files Voluntary Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition
-------------------------------------------------------------
Anna's Linens, Inc., a specialty retailer of value priced home
fashions, on June 15 disclosed that it has filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court, in Santa
Ana, CA on June 14, 2015.  The Company will continue to operate its
business as "debtors-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the
Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions
of the Bankruptcy Code and the orders of the Bankruptcy Court.

The Company has negotiated a debtor in possession financing
arrangement ("DIP") with Salus Capital, the Company's pre-petition
lender.  Financing from the DIP is expected to provide the Company
with an immediate source of funds to satisfy the customary
obligations associated with the daily operations of its business,
including the timely payment of employee wages and delivery of
product.

In connection with its Chapter 11 filing, the Company has retained
the investment bank Wunderlich Securities, and is working to
negotiate and execute an approved sale to DW Partners, a
multi-strategy fund manager with $6 billion in assets.  Although an
agency agreement has been executed with Hilco/Gordon Brothers, the
parties have agreed to support the DW transaction.

The Company is seeking customary authority from the Bankruptcy
Court that will enable it to continue to operate and serve its
customers.  The requested approvals include requests for the
authority to make wage and salary payments, continue with various
benefits for employees, and honor certain customer programs, such
as gift cards and returns on merchandise purchased prior to the
bankruptcy filing.

The Company indicated that it expects to provide additional details
with respect to the Chapter 11 filing as soon as they become
available.

                       About Anna's Linens

Anna's Linens is a specialty retailer offering home textiles,
furnishings and decor at attractive prices.  Headquartered in Costa
Mesa, California, operates a chain of 268 company owned retail
stores throughout 19 states in the United States (including Puerto
Rico and Washington, D.C.) generates over $300 million in annual
revenue and employs a workforce of over 2,500 associates.


ASARCO LLC: High Court Rejects Lawyers' Claims for Defense of Fees
------------------------------------------------------------------
Peg Brickley, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported that
the U.S. Supreme Court said on June 15 that bankruptcy courts can't
award fees to a law firm for the time its lawyers spent defending
its fees in a nasty billing dispute.

According to the Journal, in a 6-3 decision, the court rejected the
law firm's contention that defense of fees is part of the "services
rendered" to the bankruptcy estate.  Judge Clarence Thomas, writing
for the court, said that awarding fees to a law firm for defending
its fees would require a "particularly unusual deviation" from the
common-law rule that "each litigant pays his own attorney's fees,
win or lose, unless a statute or contract provides otherwise," the
Journal related.

Baker Botts LLP, which represented copper miner Asarco LLC in its
bankruptcy in 2005, argued that the company must pay $5 million to
the law firm for the time the firm spent defending its fees in a
nasty billing dispute.

The case in the Supreme Court is Baker Botts LLP v. Asarco LLC,
14-103, U.S. Supreme Court (Washington).  The case in the appeals
Court is Asarco LLC v. Jordan Hayden Womble Culbreth & Holzer PC
(In re Asarco LLC), 12-40997, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit (New Orleans).

                         About Asarco LLC

Based in Tucson, Arizona, ASARCO LLC -- http://www.asarco.com/--  

is an integrated copper mining, smelting and refining company.
Grupo Mexico S.A. de C.V. is ASARCO's ultimate parent.

ASARCO LLC filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case
No. 05-21207) on Aug. 9, 2005.  Attorneys at Baker Botts
L.L.P., and Jordan, Hyden, Womble & Culbreth, P.C., represented
the Debtor in its restructuring efforts.

On Dec. 9, 2009, Asarco Incorporated and Americas Mining
Corporation's Seventh Amended Plan of Reorganization for the
Debtors became effective and the ASARCO Asbestos Personal Injury
Settlement Trust was created and funded with nearly $1 billion in
assets, including more than $650 million in cash plus a $280
million secured note from Reorganized ASARCO.  The Plan, which was
confirmed both by the bankruptcy and district courts, reintegrated
ASARCO LLC back to parent Grupo Mexico concluding the four-year
Chapter 11 proceeding.


BION ENVIRONMENTAL: Has $1.68M Net Loss in Q3 Ended March 31
------------------------------------------------------------
Bion Environmental Technologies Inc. filed its quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $1.68 million on $3,658 of
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with a
net loss of $772,000 on $4,448 of revenues for the same period last
year.  The Company's balance sheet at Mar. 31, 2015, showed $4.41
million in total assets, $12.7 million in total liabilities, and a
stockholders' deficit of $8.33 million.  A copy of the Form 10-Q is
available at http://is.gd/inyM7r

                      About Bion Environmental

Bion Environmental Technologies Inc.'s patented and proprietary
technology provides a comprehensive environmental solution to a
significant source of pollution in US agriculture, large scale
livestock facilities known as Confined Animal Feeding Operations.
Bion's technology produces substantial reductions of nutrient
releases (primarily nitrogen and phosphorus) to both water and air
(including ammonia, which is subsequently re-deposited to the
ground) from livestock waste streams based upon the Company's
operations and research to date (and third party peer review).

Bion reported a net loss of $5.76 million for the year ended  June
30, 2014, following a net loss of $8.24 million for the year ended
June 30, 2013.  GHP Horwath, P.C., in Denver, Colorado, issued a
"going concern" qualification on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended June 30, 2014, stating that the
Company has not generated significant revenue and has suffered
recurring losses from operations.  



COLT DEFENSE: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor affiliates that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions:

     Debtor                                        Case No.
     ------                                        --------
     Colt Holding Company LLC                      15-11296
     547 New Park Avenue
     West Hartford, CT 06110

     Colt Defense LLC                              15-11287

     Colt Defense Technical Services LLC           15-11288

     Colt Finance Corp.                            15-11289

     New Colt Holding Corp.                        15-11290

     Colt International Cooperatief U.A.           15-11291

     Colt's Manufacturing Company LLC              15-11292

     Colt Security LLC                             15-11293

     Colt Canada Corporation                       15-11294

     CDH II Holdco Inc.                            15-11295
  
Type of Business: Designers, developers, and manufacturers of
                  firearms for military, law enforcement, personal
                  defense, and recreational purposes.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 14, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware (Delaware)

Debtors' Local    Jason M. Madron, Esq.
Delaware          RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
Counsel:          One Rodney Square
                  P.O. Box 551
                  Wilmington, DE 19899
                  Tel: 302-651-7595
                  Fax: 302-651-7701
                  Email: madron@rlf.com

                    - and -

                  Jason M. Madron, Esq.
                  RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
                  One Rodney Square
                  P.O. Box 551
                  Wilmington, DE 19899
                  Tel: 302-651-7595
                  Fax: 302-651-7701
                  Email: madron@rlf.com

Debtors'          John J Rapisardi, Esq.
Attorneys:        Peter Friedman, Esq.
                  Joseph Zujkowski, Esq.
                  Diana M Perez, Esq.
                  O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
                  Times Square Tower
                  Seven Times Square
                  New York, NY 10036
                  Tel: 212-326-2000
                  Fax: 212-326-2061
                  Email: rapisardi@omm.com
                         pfriedman@omm.com
                         jzujkowski@omm.com
                         dperez@omm.com

Debtors'          GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP
Canadian
Counsel:

Debtors'          PERELLA WEINBERG PARTNERS LP
Investment
Banker and
Financial
Advisor:

Debtors'          MACKINAC PARTNERS LLC
Restructuring
Advisor:

Debtors'          KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS LLC
Claims and        2335 Alaska Avenue
Noticing          El Segundo, CA 90245
Agent:            Tel: 888-251-3076

Estimated Assets: $100 million to $500 million

Estimated Debts: $100 million to $500 million

The petition was signed by John P. Rigas, as managing member of
Colt Holding Company, LLC.

Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Wilmington Trust Company            Bond Debt        $260,937,500
246 Goose Lane
Suite 105
Guilford, CT 06437
Fax: 203-453-1183

Magpul Industries Corp.             Trade Debt           $981,537
8226 Bee Caves Road
Austin, TX 78746
Fax: 303-828-3469

Microbest, Inc.                     Trade Debt           $755,172
670 Captain Neville Drive
Waterbury, CT 06705
Fax: 203-597-0655

The Wilson Arms Company             Trade Debt           $628,530
97 Leetes Island Road
Branford, CT 06405
Fax: 203-488-0135

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP          Services             $551,653
185 Asylum St.
Suite 2400
Hartford, CT 06103
Fax: 678-529-4615

Schmid Tool & Engineering Inc.     Trade Debt            $478,066
930 North Villa Avenue
Villa Park, IL 60181
Fax: 630-333-1734

Superior Plating Company           Trade Debt            $404,200
2 Lacey Place
Southport, CT 06890
Fax: 203-254-3618

Deloitte Tax LLP                    Services             $398,573
200 Berkeley St.
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Fax: 617-437-2000

ESS Solutions                      Trade Debt            $395,671
500 High Street
Central Falls, RI 02863
Fax: 401-785-9206

Light Metals Coloring Co., Inc.    Trade Debt            $360,967
270 Spring St.
Southington, CT 06489
Fax: 860-621-6312

Pioneer Tool Supply Co. Inc.       Trade Debt            $350,967
40 Bowles Rd
P.O. Box 1270
Agawam, MA 01001
Fax: 413-739-7183

B.M.L. Tool & Mfg. Corp.           Trade Debt            $264,472
67 Enterprise Dr.
Monroe, CT 06468
Fax: 203-261-8165

Toth Inc.                          Trade Debt            $233,333

Cambridge Valley Machining Inc.    Trade Debt            $228,555

Duz Manufacturing, Inc.            Trade Debt            $217,845

Willis of New York, Inc.            Services             $203,581

Accro-Met, Inc.                    Trade Debt            $193,935

Creed Monarch, Inc.                Trade Debt            $185,161

Cantor Colburn LLP                  Services             $165,478
  
Rathbone Precision Metals, Inc.    Trade Debt            $149,277

L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc.    Trade Debt            $143,356

Northern Precision Mfg.            Trade Debt            $142,078

Alphacasting, Inc.                 Trade Debt            $140,102

Fidus Systems Inc.                  Services             $139,985

Skadden, Arps, Slate,               Services             $130,000
Meagher & Flom LLP

Aerial Industries Inc.             Trade Debt            $129,572

U.S. Armament Corp.                Trade Debt            $127,773

Bourdon Forge Company, Inc.        Trade Debt            $127,083

Novak Designs Inc.                 Trade Debt            $120,624
  
L.W. Schneider Inc.                Trade Debt            $119,026


COLT DEFENSE: Proposes to Pay $11.3MM to Critical Vendors
---------------------------------------------------------
Colt Defense LLC and its affiliated debtors ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to enter interim and final
orders authorizing them to pay the prepetition claims of critical
vendors.

The Debtors propose to pay the prepetition obligations of certain
vendors, suppliers, service providers and similar entities that
provide goods or services critical to the ongoing operation of the
Debtors' businesses in the ordinary course in an amount not to
exceed $10.6 million on an interim basis and $11.3 million on a
final basis.

The Debtors will condition payments to critical vendors on each
vendor's agreement to continue to provide supplies or services to
the Debtors during the Chapter 11 cases consistent with the
practices and programs in place in the 12 months before the
Petition Date.

The $11.3 million to be paid to critical vendors is approximately
79% of all estimated trade claims and 4% of all unsecured claims in
the Chapter 11 cases.

                            About Colt

Colt Defense LLC is one of the world's oldest and most iconic
designers, developers, and manufacturers of firearms for military,
law enforcement, personal defense, and recreational purposes and
was founded over 175 years ago by Samuel Colt, who patented the
first commercial successful revolving cylinder firearm in 1836 and
began supplying U.S. and international military customers with
firearms in 1847.  Colt is incorporated in Delaware and
headquartered in West Hartford, Connecticut.

In 1992, Colt Manufacturing Company, then the principal operating
subsidiary, filed chapter 11 petitions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Connecticut.  An investment by Zilkha & Co.
allowed CMC to confirm a chapter 11 plan and emerge from bankruptcy
in 1994.

Sometime after 1994, majority ownership of the Company transitioned
from Zilkha & Co. to Sciens Capital Management.

On June 14, 2015, Colt Holding Company LLC and 9 affiliates,
including Colt Defense LLC, filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code to pursue a
sale of the assets as a going concern.  The cases are pending joint
administration under Case No. 15-11296 (Bankr. D. Del.).

Colt Defense estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets and
debt.

The Debtors tapped Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., and O'Melveny &
Myers LLP, as attorneys, and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
claims and noticing agent.


COLT DEFENSE: Says Business As Usual During Ch. 11 Process
----------------------------------------------------------
Colt Defense LLC announced on June 14 in voluntary Chapter 11
materials filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware a process that will allow for an accelerated
sale of Colt's business operations in the US and Canada.

Colt's current sponsor, Sciens Capital Management LLC, has agreed
to act as a "stalking horse bidder" and has proposed to purchase
substantially all of Colt's assets and assume secured liabilities
and all liabilities related to existing agreements with employees,
customers, vendors, and trade creditors.  Colt intends for the sale
to ensure a smooth and swift transition of the business with all of
its iconic brands, products, and operations supported by a stronger
balance sheet due to a significantly lower debt burden.  As part of
the Sciens led bid, Colt will be able to reassure its employees and
local community of its commitment to continued operations in West
Hartford through a long term extension on the lease for its
manufacturing facilities and campus in West Hartford.  In
accordance with the sale process under section 363 of the
Bankruptcy Code, notice of the pending sale to Sciens will be given
to third parties and competing bids will be solicited, with an
independent committee of Colt's board of managers established to
manage the bidding process and evaluate bids.

The Company intends to continue its normal business operations
throughout the accelerated sale process and has asked the
Bankruptcy Court to approve certain Company requests to protect
trade creditors, vendors, and suppliers, thereby allowing for its
operations to continue uninterrupted during the Bankruptcy Court
supervised sale process.  Union-related agreements will also be
unaffected and employees will be paid all wages, salaries and
benefits on a timely basis.

The current management team, which has been led since October 2013
by President and CEO Dennis Veilleux, will remain in place
throughout the process.

"The plan we are announcing and have filed today will allow Colt to
restructure its balance sheet while meeting all of its obligations
to customers, vendors, suppliers and employees and providing for
maximum continuity in the Company's current and future business
operations," said Keith Maib, Chief Restructuring Officer of Colt
Defense LLC.  "While entering Chapter 11 protection in the absence
of a consensual agreement with our noteholders was not our
preference and we do not take it lightly, we are confident it is
the best path going forward and will enable us to continue to gain
traction on a challenging but achievable turnaround in our business
performance and competitive positioning in the international, U.S.
government and consumer marketplaces.  Importantly, Colt remains
open for business and our team will continue to be sharply focused
on delivering for our customers and being a good commercial partner
to our vendors and suppliers.  We look forward to successfully
executing on this plan, which provides a sound path of stewardship
for an iconic American brand and the key stakeholders we serve."

Colt's existing secured lenders have also agreed to provide,
subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court, $20 million in debtor
in possession credit facilities to allow for continuation of
operations in the ordinary course of business during the Chapter 11
process.  The entire process is expected to be complete within
60-90 days.

On June 12, 2015, Colt's previously announced exchange offer,
consent solicitation and solicitation of acceptances of a
prepackaged plan of reorganization with respect to its 8.75% Senior
Notes due 2017 expired.  The conditions to the exchange offer, the
consent solicitation and the prepackaged plan of reorganization
were not satisfied and such conditions were not waived by Colt.
All 8.75% Senior Notes due 2017 of Colt tendered and not validly
withdrawn pursuant to such exchange offer will be returned promptly
to the tendered holder thereof in accordance with the Offer to
Exchange, Consent Solicitation Statement, and Disclosure Statement
Soliciting Acceptances of a Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization,
dated April 14, 2015, as supplemented, and applicable law.

Perella Weinberg Partners L.P. is acting as financial advisor of
the Company, Mackinac Partners LLC is acting as restructuring
advisor of the Company and O'Melveny & Myers LLP is the Company's
legal counsel.

For access to Court documents and other general information about
the Chapter 11 cases, please visit:
http://www.kccllc.net/coltdefense

                           About Colt

Colt -- http://www.colt.com-- is one of the world's leading
designers, developers and manufacturers of firearms.  The company
has supplied civilian, military and law enforcement customers in
the United States and throughout the world for more than 175 years.
Its subsidiary, Colt Canada Corporation, is the Canadian
government's Center of Excellence for small arms and is the
Canadian military's sole supplier of the C7 rifle and C8 carbine.
Colt operates its manufacturing facilities in West Hartford,
Connecticut and Kitchener, Ontario.


COLT DEFENSE: To Pursue Biz Sale in Ch.11 After Prepack Rejected
----------------------------------------------------------------
American gun maker Colt Defense LLC sought bankruptcy protection to
pursue a sale of the business after it failed to obtain enough
votes from noteholders on a reorganization plan.

Sciens Capital Management, which own 87% of the equity interests in
Colt, will serve as stalking horse bidder, meaning Sciens will make
the first bid for the gun maker.  The Debtors did not disclose the
purchase price.  The Debtors intend to file with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware an executed asset
purchase agreement with NewCo by June 29, 2015.

According to a term sheet, absent higher and better offers, NewCo,
a new entity to be organized by Sciens, will purchase the assets
for an aggregate consideration of (i) the assumption of the senior
loan, term loan and the DIP financing facilities, (ii) the
assumption of certain liabilities, including the prepetition claims
of vendors and suppliers, and the (iii) assumption of certain
executory contracts and unexpired leases.  

Colt says Sciens' stalking horse bid will serve as a basis to
foster competitive bidding.  The Debtors intend to conduct an
expeditious sale process based on this schedule:

  -- To participate in the auction, interested parties must submit
initial bids by July 30, 2015 at 5:00 p.m.

  -- Objections to the sale will be due no later than July 31, 2015
at 4:00 p.m.; and

  -- If qualified bids are received, an auction will be conducted
on Aug. 3, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. (EDT);

  -- The Debtors will provide electronic notice of the results of
the auction no later than one business day after the conclusion of
the auction; and

  -- The sale hearing will be conducted by the Court on Aug. 7,
2015 at 10:00 a.m. (EDT).

The Debtors propose a hearing on the proposed bid and auction
procedures by July 13, 2015.  Objections to the sale process will
be due June 29, 2015.

To finance the Chapter 11 case pending the sale of the assets,
existing secured creditors have agreed to provide $20 million in
new liquidity, $10 million of which will be funded promptly upon
entry of an interim order approving the DIP financing.

               Institutional Holders Reject Plan

The Company's secured debt consists of a $72.9 million term loan
(secured by a first lien on intellectual property and a second lien
on all other assets), a $35 million senior loan (secured by a
second lien on intellectual property and a first lien on all other
assets), and $250 million in 8.75% senior notes due 2017.

Over the last nine months, the Debtors have been involved in an
intensive effort to address liquidity issues resulting from their
overleveraged capital structure.  At the end of 2014 and early
2015, the Debtors successfully refinanced their existing secured
loans.

In light of the ongoing $22 million in annual cash interest
payments and looming 2017 maturity of $250 million, the Debtors
determined that a restructuring of the senior notes was essential.
However, the company failed twice in its attempts to achieve a
consensual prepackaged plan of reorganization.

Approximately one-fourth of the outstanding principal amount of the
senior notes (approximately $61 million) are held by retail "mom
and pop" holders that total approximately 2,700 in number. The
remaining balance (approximately $189 million) are held principally
by institutional holders, many of whom purchased the notes in the
secondary market.

The vote on the proposed prepackaged plan reflected a significant
divide between institutional holders and retail holders.  Holders
representing approximately 77% of the total number of holders of
senior notes who actually voted on the initial prepackaged plan
accepted, indicating strong support from retail holders; but 94.9%
in amount of the senior notes rejected the initial plan, which was
plainly dominated by voting institutional holders controlling large
blocks of senior notes.  The plan was amended to, among other
things, include a $5 million contribution from the sponsor, and an
increase the new secured notes offered to senior noteholders by $34
million.  But the amended prepackaged plan was still rejected by
majority of the noteholders.

                 Insider Will Purchase the Business

Having determined that confirmation of a prepackaged plan is not
possible, the Debtors have filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court
seeking to facilitate an expeditious sale of substantially all of
the Debtors' assets as a going concern and to ensure the
continuation of their business.

Keith A. Maib, the CRO, says the Debtors intend to pursue an
expeditious section 363 sale rather than a plan process as
resorting to a battle of dueling plans sponsored by warring
factions would be extremely costly and confusing to the Debtors'
vendors, suppliers, employees, and customers.

The stalking horse bidder in the proposed sale process will be
Sciens.  Sciens acquired majority ownership of Colt from Zilkha &
Co. in 1994.  Sciens is an investment firm founded by John P.
Rigas, who was a partner at Zilkha & Co. at the time of the 1994
investment.

"It comes as no surprise that the Sponsor indicated its willingness
to make a stalking horse bid for the Company, given the Sponsor's
integral involvement with and commitment to the Company over the
last 10 years and in the restructuring of the Company over the last
year," Mr. Maib stated in a court filing.

Because Sciens is an insider, Colt's governing board appointed a
committee of independent directors with respect to the sale
process. The independent committee approved Sciens as the stalking
horse bidder believing that its bid will give Colt an attractive
opportunity in terms of uninterrupted continuity of the Company's
business.

                Secured Lenders Support Quick Sale

The Debtors negotiated with their existing secured lenders $20
million of postpetition financing, which will provide the Debtors
with sufficient liquidity to conduct an orderly sale process.

According to Colt, the prepetition secured lenders strongly endorse
an expedited sale process, as reflected in the milestone dates
contained in the credit agreements governing the DIP Facilities:

  -- Entry of the bidding procedures order within 28 days after the
Petition Date;

  -- An auction will have been conducted within 57 days after the
Petition Date;

  -- A sale order will have been entered within 61 days of the
Petition Date; and

  -- A sale of the assets will have been consummated within 61 days
of the Petition Date.

                        First Day Motions

Aside from the sale motion, the Debtors on the Petition Date filed
motions to:

   * direct joint administration of their Chapter 11 cases;

   * authorize Colt Holding Company LLC to act as foreign
representative on behalf of the Debtors' estates;

   * pay certain prepetition taxes and fees;

   * prohibit utilities from refusing or discontinuing service;

   * maintain and renew their prepetition insurance policies;

   * pay prepetition wages and benefits to employees;

   * pay prepetition claims of critical vendors;

   * maintain their cash management system; and

   * obtain postpetition financing.

A copy of the affidavit in support of the first day pleadings is
available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Colt_H_1st_Day_Affidavit.pdf

                            About Colt

Colt Defense LLC is one of the world's oldest and most iconic
designers, developers, and manufacturers of firearms for military,
law enforcement, personal defense, and recreational purposes and
was founded over 175 years ago by Samuel Colt, who patented the
first commercial successful revolving cylinder firearm in 1836 and
began supplying U.S. and international military customers with
firearms in 1847.  Colt is incorporated in Delaware and
headquartered in West Hartford, Connecticut.

In 1992, Colt Manufacturing Company, then the principal operating
subsidiary, filed chapter 11 petitions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Connecticut.  An investment by Zilkha & Co.
allowed CMC to confirm a chapter 11 plan and emerge from bankruptcy
in 1994.

Sometime after 1994, majority ownership of the Company transitioned
from Zilkha & Co. to Sciens Capital Management.

On June 14, 2015, Colt Holding Company LLC and 9 affiliates,
including Colt Defense LLC, filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code to pursue a
sale of the assets as a going concern.  The cases are pending joint
administration under Case No. 15-11296 (Bankr. D. Del.).

Colt Defense estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets and
debt.

The Debtors tapped Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., and O'Melveny &
Myers LLP, as attorneys, and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
claims and noticing agent.


CORINTHIAN COLLEGES: Grilled Over How Co. Failed
------------------------------------------------
Peg Brickley, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported that as
part of the meeting mandated by the Bankruptcy Code, federal
bankruptcy watchdogs and lawyers for California's attorney general
grilled representatives of Corinthian Colleges Inc. on June 12,
seeking information about what brought down the operator of
for-profit schools.

According to the report, Corinthian Chief Financial Officer Robert
C. Owen and William Nolan, an outside restructuring consultant,
testified under oath about the company's wrangles with regulators,
as well as about its finances.  Mr. Owen said he didn't believe
allegations that Corinthian lured students with phony job placement
data, but said he knew little detail, as his responsibilities are
"financial in nature," the Journal said.

                    About Corinthian Colleges

Corinthian Colleges, Inc., Pegasus Education, Inc., and 23
affiliated entities filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr.
D.
Del. Lead Case No. 15-10952) on May 4, 2015.  The Chapter 11
petitions are being jointly administered under the caption In re:
Corinthian Colleges, Inc. et al., Case No. 15-10952 (KJC).  The
cases are assigned to Judge Kevin J. Carey.

Corinthian Colleges, Inc., was founded in February 1995, and
through acquisitions became one of the largest for-profit
post-secondary education companies in the United States and
Canada.

Corinthian Colleges, which in 2014 had more than 100 campuses all
over the U.S. and Canada, sought bankruptcy protection to complete
an orderly wind down of its operations.

The Debtors tapped Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., as counsel;
FTI
Consulting, Inc., as restructuring advisors; and Rust
Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy as claims and noticing agent.

Corinthian Colleges disclosed total assets of $19.2 million and
total liabilities of $143.1 million in its petition.


COSTA DORADA: Case Summary & 14 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Costa Dorada Apartments Corp.
          dba Villas de Costa Dorada
        900 Calle Emilio Gonzalez
        Isabela, PR 00662

Case No.: 15-04474

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 12, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Puerto Rico (Old San Juan)

Judge: Hon. Enrique S. Lamoutte Inclan

Debtor's Counsel: Jaime Rodriguez Rodriquez, Esq.
                  RODRIGUEZ & ASOCIADOS, ABOGADOS, CSP
                  Po Box 2477
                  Vega Baja, PR 00694
                  Tel: 787 858-5324
                  Fax: 7878585324
                  Email: lcdojaimerodriguez@yahoo.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Carlos Rafael Fernandez Rodriquez,
president.

A list of the Debtor's 14 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb15-04474.pdf


CROSS BORDER: Posts $2.46-Million Net Loss in 2014
--------------------------------------------------
Cross Border Resources, Inc., reported a net loss of $2.46 million
on $12.4 million of oil and gas sales in 2014, compared with a net
income of $3.35 million on $13.1 million of oil and gas sales in
the prior year.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2014, showed $33.3 million
in total assets, $16.0 million in total liabilities, and
stockholders' equity of $17.3 million.

At Dec. 31, 2014, the Company had working capital of $3.26 million
(including assets held for sale of $15.6 million) and outstanding
debt of $8.2 million (consisting of a line of credit).  The company
would have a working capital deficit of $10.8 million (excluding
Assets Held for Sale, Net of ARO Liabilities associated with the
Assets Held for Sale).  The Company was not in compliance with the
covenants of its line of credit with Independent Bank and had no
availability under this line of credit.  The Company currently does
not have sufficient funds to repay these obligations.  The Company
is exploring available financing options, including the sale of
debt, equity, or assets.  If the Company is unable to finance its
operations on acceptable terms or at all, its business, financial
condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely
affected.  As a result of these conditions, there is substantial
doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.

A copy of the Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission is available at http://is.gd/LmyUXI

                        About Cross Border

Dallas-based Cross Border Resources, Inc. (XBOR:OTC US) is an oil
and gas exploration and development company.  The Company currently
owns over 865,893 gross (approximately 293,843 net) mineral and
lease acres in New Mexico, approximately 25,000 acres
of it exists within the Permian Basin.



ENERPULSE TECHNOLOGIES: Has $152K Net Income in First Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Enerpulse Technologies, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing
net income of $152,000 on $110,000 of sales for the three months
ended March 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $702,000 on $97,200
of sales for the same period in 2014.

The Company's balance sheet at March 31, 2015, showed $3.42 million
in total assets, $2.91 million in total liabilities, and
stockholders' equity of $508,000.

As a result of the Company's losses from operations, minimal
revenue generation and limited capital resources, its independent
registered public accounting firm's report on the Company's
consolidated financial statements as of, and for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014, includes an explanatory paragraph discussing that
these conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       http://is.gd/nXpDuv

Enerpulse Technologies, Inc., through its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Enerpulse, Inc., designs, develops, manufactures, and markets an
energy and efficiency enhancing product in the automotive industry
under the Pulstar brand name.  The company provides capacitor-
based precise combustion ignition (PCI) technology, which enhances
spark-ignited internal combustion (IC) engines in the areas of
horsepower, torque, fuel economy, acceleration, combustion
stability, and emissions.  It offers PCI pulse plugs for the
natural gas IC engine, automotive OEM, and automotive and power
sports aftermarkets.  The company is headquartered in Albuquerque,
New Mexico.



EVPP LLC: Ohio Court Rules on Appeal in Eagle's View Rift
---------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Appeals of Ohio, 12th District, Butler County, ruled
on the appeal filed by the defendant-appellants in the case
captioned EAGLE'S VIEW PROFESSIONAL PARK CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EVPP, LLC, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants, NO. CA2014-06-134 (Ohio Ct. App., 12 Dist.,
Butler County).

Defendant-appellants, EVP, LLC (EVPP) and Robert R. Rockenfield,
appealed multiple decisions from the Butler Bounty Court of Common
Pleas in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Eagle's View Professional
Park Condominium Unit Owner's Association, Inc. ("Association") and
intervenors-appellees, Michael Yoakum, Mark Schroder, Thomas
Sullivan, Michael White, Chris Eubank, Chris Boerger, and Doug
Rolfes (collectively, the "Purchasers").

First, appellants asserted the trial court erred in its July 26,
2013 order compelling them to comply with the Right to Sell
Agreement and close on the sales of properties which were ordered
foreclosed by virtue of an "Agreed Final Appealable Judgment/Order"
entered into by the Association and EVPP. The properties were sold
at an auction on December 8, 2012 and purchased by the Purchasers,
but EVPP refused to close on the sales.

The appellate court dismissed the appeal as it relates to the trial
court's July 26, 2013 order. It held that the order is not a final
appealable order, and accordingly, the appellate court is still
without jurisdiction to consider appellants' arguments related to
that order.

Additionally, appellants claimed the trial court erred in finding
Rockenfield in contempt for failing to abide by the July 26, 2013
order, ordering him to sign the deeds transferring the condominium
units, and ordering him to pay the related attorney fees of the
Association and Purchasers.

The appellate court affirmed the challenged decisions of the trial
court.  The appellate court found the appellant's arguments with
regards to the trial court's contempt finding are barred by res
judicata.  The order was the subject of the appellant's previous
appeal which was already dismissed with prejudice for failure to
prosecute.  This resulted in a final judgment on the merits as to
the contempt finding and appellants are barred from relitigating
the matter.

As to appellants' claim that the trial court erred in ordering
Rockenfield to pay attorney fees, the appellate court found that
appellants failed to elaborate or support with citations to
authority or the record how the trial court erred in awarding
attorney fees in this case.

A copy of the May 18, 2015 opinion is available at
http://is.gd/PXGwXvfrom Leagle.com.

Cuni, Ferguson & LeVay Co., L.P.A., Lisa M. Conn, 10655 Springfield
Pike, Cincinnati, Ohio 45215, for plaintiff-appellee.

Rex A. Wolfgang, 246 High Street, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for
defendants-appellants, EVPP, LLC and Robert R. Rockenfield.

Graydon Head & Ritchey, LLP, J. Michael Debbeler --
mdebbeler@graydon.com -- Jeffrey J. Hanneken --
jhanneken@graydon.com -- 1900 Fifth Third Center, 511 Walnut
Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, for Purchasers.

                         About EVPP, LLC

EVPP, LLC, fdba Eagle View Professional Park, in Mason, Ohio,
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No.
13-10005) on Jan. 2, 2013, in Cincinnati.  Bankruptcy Judge Burton
Perlman presided over the case.  Norman L. Slutsky, Esq. --
nslutsky@fuse.net -- at Slutsky & Slutsky Co. L P A, served as the
Debtor's counsel.  EVPP scheduled assets of $3,016,000 and
liabilities of $2,042,625.  A list of the Company's five unsecured
creditors, filed together with the petition, is available for free
at http://bankrupt.com/misc/ohsb13-10005.pdf The petition was
signed by Robert Rockenfield, sole member.

The Bankruptcy Court dismissed the bankruptcy petition finding it
was filed in bad faith.


FINDEX.COM INC: Incurs $117K Net Loss for First Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------
Findex.com, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss
of $117,000 on $42,800 of revenue for the three months ended March
31, 2015, compared with a net loss of $385,000 on $53,700 of
revenue for the same period in 2014.

The Company's balance sheet at March 31, 2015, showed $2.07 million
in total assets, $1.64 million in total liabilities and total
stockholders' equity of $428,000.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had negative working capital of
$1.46 million, and an accumulated deficit of $2.88 million.  The
Company used $148,068 in operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2015.  Although these factors raise substantial doubt as
to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, the
Company has taken several actions intended to mitigate against this
risk.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       http://is.gd/ePkdHc
                          
Headquartered in Lake Park, Fla., FindEx.com, Inc., develops,
publishes, markets, and distributes and directly sells consumer
and business software products for PC, Macintosh(R) and Mobile
devices.  The Company develops its software products through in-
house initiatives supplemented by outside developers.  The Company
markets and distributes its software products principally through
direct marketing and Internet sales programs, but also through
retailers and distributors.

The Company reported a net loss of $1.39 million on $177,000
in revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared with a net
loss of $617,000 on $158,000 of revenue in the same period last
year.

D. Brooks & Associates CPA's P.A. expressed substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern citing
that the Company has incurred operating losses, has incurred
negative cash flows from operations and has a working capital
deficit.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2014, showed $1.99 million
in total assets, $1.85 million in total liabilities, and
stockholders' equity of $146,000.


FREE GOSPEL: Section 341 Meeting Scheduled for July 13
------------------------------------------------------
A meeting of creditors in the bankruptcy case of The Free Gospel of
the Apostles' Doctrine will be held on July 13, 2015, at
2:00 p.m. at 341 meeting room 6th Floor at 6305 Ivy Ln., Greenbelt.


Creditors have until Oct. 13, 2015, to file their proofs of claim.

This is the first meeting of creditors required under Section
341(a) of the Bankruptcy Code in all bankruptcy cases.

All creditors are invited, but not required, to attend.  This
meeting of creditors offers the one opportunity in a bankruptcy
proceeding for creditors to question a responsible office of the
Debtor under oath about the company's financial affairs and
operations that would be of interest to the general body of
creditors.

The Free Gospel of the Apostles' Doctrine filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 15-18209) on June 9,
2015.  The petition was signed by Antoinette Green-Snow as
executive administrator.  The Debtor estimated assets of $10
million to $50 million and debts of $1 million to $10 million.

Frank Morris, II, Esq., at Law Office of Frank Morris II, serves as
the Debtor's counsel.


FUWEI FILMS: Obtains Extension of NASDAQ Listing Compliance Period
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fuwei Films (Holdings) Co., Ltd., a manufacturer and distributor of
high-quality BOPET plastic films in China, on June 12 disclosed
that the Company received a letter from the Nasdaq Stock Market on

June 9, 2015 stating that while the Company had not regained
compliance with the NASDAQ Listing Rule 5550(a)(1) until June 8,
2015, it was eligible for an additional 180-day grace period, until

December 7, 2015, to regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule.

On December 8, 2014, the Company received a letter from NASDAQ
notifying it of its failure to maintain a minimum closing bid price
of $1.00 over the then preceding 30 consecutive trading days for
its ordinary shares as required by the Bid Price Rule.  The letter
stated that the Company had until
June 8, 2015 to demonstrate compliance by maintaining a minimum
closing bid price of at least $1.00 for a minimum of 10 consecutive
trading days.

NASDAQ's determination was based on the Company having met the
continued listing requirement for Market Value of Publicly Held
Shares and all other applicable requirements for initial listing on
the NASDAQ Capital Market, with the exception of the Bid Price
Rule, and on the Company's written notice to NASDAQ of its
intention to cure the deficiency during the second compliance
period by effecting a reverse stock split, if necessary.  If at any
time during this additional time period the closing bid price of
the Company's security is at least $1 per share for a minimum of 10
consecutive business days, NASDAQ will provide written confirmation
of compliance and this matter will be closed.  If compliance cannot
be demonstrated by December 7, 2015, Staff will provide written
notification that the Company's ordinary shares will be delisted.
At that time, the Company may appeal NASDAQ's determination to
delist its ordinary shares to a NASDAQ Hearings Panel.  The Company
will monitor the closing bid price of its ordinary shares and will
consider various possible options, and, if necessary, it intends to
effect a reverse stock split, to regain compliance by the
Expiration Date.

                      About Fuwei Films

Fuwei Films conducts its business through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Fuwei Films (Shandong) Co., Ltd. ("Shandong Fuwei").
Shandong Fuwei develops, manufactures and distributes high-quality
plastic films using the biaxial oriented stretch technique,
otherwise known as BOPET film (biaxially oriented polyethylene
terephthalate).  Fuwei's BOPET film is widely used to package food,
medicine, cosmetics, tobacco, and alcohol, as well as in the
imaging, electronics, and magnetic products industries.


GARB OIL: Incurs $613K Net Loss in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------
Garb Oil & Power Corporation filed its quarterly report on Form
10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $614,000 on $nil of revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with a net loss of
$349,000 on $200,000 of revenue for the same period in 2014.  The
Company's balance sheet at March 31, 2015, showed $1.25 million in
total assets, $8.76 million in total liabilities, and a
stockholders' equity of $13.31 million.  A copy of the Form 10-Q is
available at http://is.gd/NVoBfw

                      About Garb Oil & Power

Garb Oil & Power Corporation provides equipment to waste processing
and recycling industries.  The company supplies enabling
technologies that allow its clients to push their waste processing
and recycling goals forward.  The company is involved in building
and commissioning of turn-key waste-to-energy plants and
refinement/recycling plants in e-scrap/e-waste and waste-rubber.
The company develops enabling technologies for waste processing and
recycling waste rubber; municipal waste, domestic waste, waste to
energy, and electronic scrap; and derivatives, including rubber
power, fine rubber particles, alloys of rubber, TPE-V and rubber,
elastomers, compounds, and technical rubber products from raw
material for recycling industries, and original product
manufacturers and producers.

HJ & Associates LLC expressed substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern citing that the Company has
continual net losses and large accumulated deficit.

The Company reported a net loss of $3.66 million on $300,000 in
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared with a net
loss
of $2.05 million on $nil of revenues in the same period last year.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2014, showed $1.26 million
in total assets, $8.16 million in total liabilities, and
stockholders' deficit of $6.9 million.



GREENBRIER COS: S&P Affirms BB- Corp. Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'BB-' corporate
credit rating on Lake Oswego, Ore.-based Greenbrier Cos. Inc.  The
outlook is stable.

"The affirmation reflects our assessment of Greenbrier's recently
improved profitability, reflecting operating efficiencies that we
believe could sustain the recent margin improvement, as well as
product diversity and market share that has gradually improved over
the past years," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Svetlana
Olsha.  "We are therefore revising Greenbrier's manufacturing
business risk profile to 'fair' from 'weak,' as defined in our
criteria," added Ms. Olsha.

"We distinguish between Greenbrier's manufacturing and leasing
activities, and determine separate business risk and financial risk
assessments.  We believe Greenbrier has "adequate" sources of
liquidity to cover its needs, as defined in our criteria, with
sources exceeding uses by 1.2x or more over the next 12-18 months.
We believe net sources would remain positive even if EBITDA
declined by 15%.  We believe the qualitative factors relating to
Greenbrier's liquidity, such as its standing in credit markets,
risk management, and relationship with banks, all support our
"adequate" assessment," S&P said.

The outlook on Greenbrier is stable, reflecting S&P's view that
rail industry fundamentals will remain favorable through the next
12 to 18 months.

S&P could lower the rating if it forecasts an industry downturn or
eroding market share could significantly hamper Greenbrier's
operating prospects, or if debt-funded acquisitions or
shareholder-friendly initiatives cause manufacturing debt to EBITDA
to deteriorate above 4x.

S&P could raise the rating if the company progresses in improving
its profitability, if the outlook for industry fundamentals remains
sound, and if S&P believes that financial policies will be
consistent with a higher rating.



GROW CONDOS: Incurs $47,400 Net Loss in First Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------
Grow Condos, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss
of $47,400 on $11,300 of total revenues for the three months ended
March 31, 2015, compared with net income of $5,400 on $5,400 of
total revenues for the same period in 2014.

The Company's balance sheet at March 31, 2015, showed $1.25 million
in total assets, $1.1 million in total liabilities and
stockholders' equity of $153,000.

In their report dated Oct. 14, 2014, the Company's independent
registered public accounting firm included an emphasis-of-matter
paragraph with respect to the Company's financial statements for
the period from date of inception (Sept. 9, 2013) to June 30, 2014
concerning the Company's assumption that it will continue as a
going concern.  The Company operates within an industry that is
illegal under federal law, has yet to achieve profitable
operations, has a significant accumulated deficit and is dependent
on its ability to raise capital from stockholders or other sources
to sustain operations and ultimately achieve viable profitable
operations.  As reported in these condensed consolidated financial
statements, the Company has not yet achieved profitable operations
and has an accumulated deficit of $11.4 million, which it has
determined raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       http://is.gd/EHWfFZ

Grow Condos, Inc. operates as a real estate purchaser, developer,
and manager of specific use industrial properties in the United
States.  The company provides condo type turn-key grow facilities
to support cannabis growers.  It is also involved in the
development, lease, ownership, and provision of investment sales
opportunities for commercial industrial properties focused in the
cannabis production arena.  The company is based in Eagle Point,
Oregon.

The Company reported a net loss of $99,200 on $14,700 of total
revenues for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2014, compared with
a net loss of $2,390 on $900 of total revenues for the same period

in 2013.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2014, showed $1.28 million
in total assets, $1.08 million in total liabilities and
stockholders' equity of $200,200.


HOLDEN PSYCHIATRIC: Case Summary & 4 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Holden Psychiatric Institute, P.A.
           dba Psychiatric Institute
        PO Box 6788
        Springdale, AR 72766

Case No.: 15-71548

Nature of Business: Health Care

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 12, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Arkansas (Fayetteville)

Judge: Hon. Ben T Barry

Debtor's Counsel: Stanley V Bond, Esq.
                  BOND LAW OFFICE
                  P.O. Box 1893
                  Fayetteville, AR 72701-1893
                  Tel: (479) 444-0255
                  Fax: (479) 444-7141
                  Email: attybond@me.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Donnie Holden, president.

A list of the Debtor's four largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/arwb15-71548.pdf


L BRANDS: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' Issuer Default Rating
---------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the ratings for L Brands, Inc.,
including the long-term Issuer Default Rating at 'BB+'.  The Rating
Outlook is Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The affirmations reflect L Brands' strong brand recognition and
dominant market positions in intimate apparel and personal care and
beauty products, strong operating results, and solid cash flow
generation that is characteristic of an investment grade profile.
While credit metrics have been reasonable, with leverage at or
slightly below 3.5x since 2010, the 'BB+' rating takes into
consideration the company's track record of shareholder-friendly
activities which could push leverage above this range.

L Brands' strong business profile is anchored by its two flagship
brands, Victoria's Secret and Bath & Body Works; a strong direct
business; and a growing international footprint.  The company's
strong comparable store sales (comps) trends since the recession
have been driven by relevant and attractive product offerings and a
loyal customer base.  Comps increased 4% in 2014, following a 6%
increase in 2012 and 2% in 2013.  In addition to positive operating
leverage from strong comps growth, the company has driven margin
growth through efficient inventory and expense management.  EBITDA
margins in the 20%+ range compare favorably to the broader retail
average in the low teens.

Fitch expects that L Brands can sustain comps growth (excluding its
direct business) in the 2%-3% range and EBITDA margin will remain
in excess of 20% over the next three years.  This is underscored by
strong comps growth in both the Victoria's Secret brand
(approximately 63% of sales and EBITDA including the Victoria's
Secret direct business) and Bath & Body Works brand (approximately
29% of sales and 34% of EBITDA).  Its direct business, which
accounts for 16% of total revenue, is expected to benefit from
continued growth in online sales, offset by the exit off certain
non-core categories in the Victoria Secret direct and beauty
business in 2015.  These categories generated 2014 revenue of
approximately $185 million or 1.6% of total sales.

Fitch also expects square footage expansion, if executed
successfully, could drive overall top line growth in the 4% to 5%
range.  The growth of PINK in the U.S., which could be a $3 billion
business over the next few years from nearly $2 billion currently,
and the inclusion of the full lingerie and swim/sportswear lines in
expanded Victoria's Secret stores have led to increased
productivity per square foot over the past few years.
International expansion provides a strong top line and profit
opportunity by allowing the company to diversify outside of mall
based locations and reduce operational and execution risks through
its substantially franchised model (outside of the UK and Canadian
markets).

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

   -- Fitch expects that L Brands can sustain comps growth
      (excluding its direct business) in the 2%-3% range over the
      next three years;

   -- Square footage expansion, if executed successfully, could
      drive overall top line growth in the 4% to 5% range;

   -- Strong free cash flow (FCF) before regular dividends in the
      $700 million-$800 million range annually (or $100 million
      - $200 million after regular dividends) over the next two to

      three years;

   -- Capex is expected to increase to $850 million in 2015
      reflecting new store constructions and square footage
      expansion and stay in that range thereafter;

   -- Maintain a leverage profile in the mid-3x range; with future

      debt funded special dividends or share buybacks potentially
      pushing leverage higher than the 3.2x in 2014.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

A positive rating action would require both the continuation of
positive operating trends and a public commitment to maintain
financial leverage in the low 3x range.

A negative rating action could be driven by a trend of negative
comps and/or margin compression from fashion misses, execution
missteps or loss of competitive traction.  A larger than expected
debt-financed share repurchase or special dividend and/or leverage
rising to approximately 4x would be negative for the rating.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Liquidity is strong, supported by a cash balance of $650 million as
of May 2, 2015 and the company's $1 billion revolving credit
facility.  The company has a comfortable maturity profile,
staggered over many years.  Fitch considers refinancing risk low
given L Brands' strong business profile, favorable operating
trends, and reasonable leverage.

Fitch expects the company will continue to generate strong FCF
before regular dividends in the $700 million-$800 million range
annually (or $100 million-$200 million after regular dividends)
over the next two to three years.  Fitch assumes regular dividends
will be increased by 20% to 25% annually, in line with the last few
years.  Capex is expected to increase to $850 million in 2015 from
$715 million in 2014 and $690 million in 2013, reflecting new store
constructions and square footage expansion to primarily support
PINK and international growth (square footage to grow by
approximately 3.5% in 2015).

Lease-adjusted leverage stood at 3.2x as of Jan. 31, 2015.  Fitch
expects the company to maintain a leverage profile in the mid-3x
range, and fund dividends and share repurchases with FCF and
potential debt issuances.  The company's shareholder-friendly
posture is a key constraint to the rating.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed L Brands ratings and assigned these Recovery
Ratings (RRs) to its debt:

   -- Long-term IDR at 'BB+';
   -- Secured bank credit facility at 'BBB-/RR1';
   -- Senior guaranteed unsecured notes at 'BB+/RR4';
   -- Senior unsecured notes at 'BB/RR5'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The assignment of the RRs reflects 'Recovery Ratings and Notching
Criteria for Non-Financial Corporates issuers' criteria dated Nov.
18, 2014, which allows for the assignment of recovery ratings for
issuers with IDRs in the 'BB' category.



LIFEPOINT HEALTH: Fitch Affirms 'BB' IDR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed LifePoint Health, Inc.'s ratings,
including the Issuer Default Rating at 'BB'.  The ratings apply to
approximately $2.2 billion of debt at March 31, 2015.  The Rating
Outlook is Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

   -- LifePoint's leverage (total debt to EBITDA) of 3.2x is
      amongst the lowest in the for-profit hospital industry.
      Coupled with strong and consistent free cash flow, this
      gives the company financial flexibility to pursue a fairly
      aggressive growth through acquisition strategy while
      maintaining credit metrics supportive of the 'BB' IDR.

   -- Starting in the second half of 2014, organic patient volumes

      in the for profit hospital sector dramatically improved
      following several years of depressed growth.  However, Fitch

      believes the recently very strong operating performance is
      likely to taper, since certain secular headwinds remain
      intact.

   -- LifePoint's recent acquisitions have been in faster growing
      markets with a more favorable patient payor mix than the
      company's legacy markets, improving the business profile.

   -- There are headwinds to profitability.  Some are industry-
      wide concerns, including the potential for negative
      operating leverage if recently strong volume performance
      subsides, and a reduction in cash payments for demonstrating

      meaningful use of electronic health records.  Specific to
      LifePoint, the integration of a rapid succession of
      acquisitions is a drag on profitability.

Acquisitions Driving Better Results

While LifePoint remains primarily a rural and small suburban market
hospital operator, the company has recently been deploying capital
to buy hospitals in faster-growing markets, as well as making
acquisitions to build out the network of facilities in certain of
its existing markets.  This strategy has contributed to stronger
trends in patient volumes and pricing, evidenced by growth in
pricing in continuing operations being markedly better than
same-hospital results starting in 2014.

LifePoint's legacy portfolio exposed the company to certain
operating challenges.  These included high volumes of uninsured
patients and uncompensated care, sensitivity to trends in low
acuity conditions like the seasonal flu, and a greater
macroeconomic sensitivity of patient demand.  Fitch believes the
company's improved geographic mix will translate into better
organic operating trends as an increasing number of the recent
acquisitions are rolled into same-store results in 2015 - 2016.

But Strategy Not Without Challenges

The rapid pace of M&A does present some challenges.  Rolling in the
newly acquired hospitals is a headwind to profitability since the
company's typical target is a not-for-profit community hospital
that operates with margins much below the legacy LifePoint group of
hospitals.  In Q1'15, the company's operating EBITDA margin dropped
by 78 bps versus the prior year period, with management attributing
much of the decline to the integration of acquisitions.

Hospital operators acquire properties with the intent of improving
profitability over a period of several years.  The source of margin
improvement includes both the obvious sorts of cost synergies, as
well as revenue synergies stemming from relationships with patients
and health insurers.  As with any inorganic growth strategy, there
is some amount of integration risk involved, but LifePoint has a
recently successful track record based on the margin improvements
posted in the class of recently acquired hospitals.

Affordable Care Act Supporting Operations, Although Outlook is
Uncertain

LifePoint operates in markets that have historically had high
exposure to uninsured patients, contributing to a significant
financial headwind from uncompensated care.  Only nine of the 20
states in which LifePoint operates hospitals have so far opted into
Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), but the
company experienced a very marked decline in volumes of self-pay
patients in these states; same-hospital self-pay admissions in
Medicaid expansion states dropped 71% in the fourth quarter of
2014, and in all states by 42%.

There remains a significant amount of uncertainty regarding the
ACA's ultimate impact on the hospital sector.  Most immediately,
the upcoming Supreme Court decision on the legality of financial
subsidies for about 6 million health exchange plan enrolees, and
future state Medicaid expansion decisions are major questions
marks.  However, any changes to the ACA are unlikely to be
impactful enough to business profiles and financial flexibility to
move the ratings of hospital companies in the medium term.

Good Balance Sheet Flexibility

At 3.2x at March 31, 2015, LifePoint's leverage is amongst the
lowest in the for-profit hospital industry, commensurate with the
decent financial flexibility required for the 'BB' rating. Leverage
is down significantly over the past year due to EBITDA growth
contributed by the recent acquisitions, and the repayment of some
debt due in 2014, but Fitch thinks the company could increase debt
to fund larger hospital purchases as it grows in size, as well as
share repurchases.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch expects low single digit organic topline growth through the
forecast period.  This incorporates an assumption that both patient
volumes and pricing will show some pull back from the strong
results of the past couple of quarters.  Secular headwinds to
growth in the hospital sector remain intact, comparisons will
become more difficult in the second half of 2015, and the tailwind
from the ACA health insurance expansion is likely to taper.

Fitch forecasts EBITDA of $704 million and free cash flow (FCF; CFO
less capital expenditures and dividends) of about $200 million for
LifePoint in 2015, including the contribution of recent
acquisitions.

Fitch expects LifePoint's operating EBITDA margin to contract by
about 100 bps in 2015 versus the 2014 level.  The drop in
profitability is related to some negative operating leverage as
recently very strong volume growth recedes, as well as to the
integration of less profitable acquired hospitals.

Capital expenditures are forecasted at $250 million in 2015; higher
capital expenditures are related to capital commitments at recently
acquired hospitals.  In some cases, this is project-related
spending, which will support future EBITDA growth.

FCF remains above $170 million throughout the forecast period
despite higher capital expenditures.

The company deploys cash for both acquisitions and share
repurchases; total debt is maintained at a level where leverage is
consistently below 4.0x.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

A downgrade could result from gross debt/EBITDA being maintained
above 4.0x and FCF generation sustained below $150 million
annually.  The most likely driver of a negative rating action is
debt funding of capital deployment, including acquisitions and
share repurchases, leading to leverage sustained above 4.0x.  In
addition, difficulty in the integration of recent acquisitions and
the timing and level of funding of capital projects in new markets
could weigh on FCF and the credit profile.

An upgrade to 'BB+' would be supported by the company operating
with leverage below 3.0x.  Fitch does not believe LifePoint
currently has a financial incentive to operate with leverage at
such a low level, and it is inconsistent with the company's
recently more aggressive stance toward capital deployment for M&A
and share repurchases.

LIQUIDITY

LifePoint's liquidity profile is supportive of the 'BB' credit
profile.  At March 31, 2015, LifePoint's liquidity included $282
million of cash on hand, $332 million of available capacity on its
bank facility revolving loan and LTM FCF of $257 million.
LifePoint's LTM EBITDA to gross interest expense was solid for the
'BB' rating category at 5.8x and the company has ample operating
cushion under its bank facility financial maintenance covenants,
which require debt to be maintained below 4.75x EBITDA.

Debt maturities are manageable.  The next large maturity is the
term loans, which have a final maturity in 2017.  The terms of the
bank agreement give LifePoint significant flexibility to issue
additional debt, including debt secured on a basis pari passu with
the bank agreement.  The company is permitted to issue incremental
term loans or secured notes up to a senior secured leverage ratio
of 3.5x, with an $800 million carveout permitted regardless of the
senior leverage ratio.

The indentures for the two outstanding series of senior unsecured
notes due 2020 and 2021 allow additional secured debt up to a
secured leverage ratio of 3.0x and 3.5x, respectively, plus a
carveout of the greater of $200 million or 5% of total assets for
the notes due 2020 and $300 million or 6% of total assets for the
notes due 2021.  Above this level, there is a springing lien
provision that would result in the senior notes becoming equally
and ratably secured.  With a secured leverage ratio of 1.0x at
March 31, 2015, LifePoint has significant capacity for secured debt
under all of the debt agreements.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch affirms LifePoint's ratings as:

   -- Issuer Default Rating at 'BB';
   -- Secured bank facility at 'BB+/RR1';
   -- Senior unsecured notes at 'BB/RR4'.

Note that Recovery Ratings (RRs) were assigned to the debt.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.



MA LERIN HILLS: Section 341 Meeting Scheduled for July 13
---------------------------------------------------------
A meeting of creditors in the bankruptcy case of MA Lerin Hills
Holder, LP is set for July 13, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. at San Antonio
Room 333.

Creditors have until Oct. 12, 2015, to submit their proofs of
claim.

This is the first meeting of creditors required under Section
341(a) of the Bankruptcy Code in all bankruptcy cases.

All creditors are invited, but not required, to attend.  This
meeting of creditors offers the one opportunity in a bankruptcy
proceeding for creditors to question a responsible office of the
Debtor under oath about the company's financial affairs and
operations that would be of interest to the general body of
creditors.

MA Lerin Hills Holder, LP, L H Devco, Inc. and Lerin Hills Utility
Easement sought Chapter 11 for protection (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case
Nos. 15-51424, 15-51425 and 15-51426, respectively) on June 9,
2015.  The petition was signed by Andrew S. Cohen as receiver.

Dykema Cox Smith serves as the Debtors' counsel.  Golden Steves
Cohen & Gordon LLP acts as the Debtors' real estate counsel.
Padgett Strateman is the Debtors' financial advisor.

Judge Hon. Craig Gargotta is assigned to the cases.


MAGNETATION LLC: Court Wants Donlin Recano's Admin. Role Limited
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Gregory F. Kishel of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Minnesota denied the request of Magnetation LLC and its
debtor-affiliates to employ Donlin, Recano & Company to perform in
various capacities in the administration of their cases, including
the maintenance of what are described as parts of an "official
record" for the cases independently of the clerk of the court.

The motion was styled under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 156(c), and Sarah J.
Wencil, appearing on behalf of the United States Trustee, objected.


The Court memorialized rulings on the record in disposition of the
motion and the objection.  The Court held that:

     -- The Debtors’ motion, as styled under 28 U.S.C. Sec.
156(c) and for the specific complex of relief set forth in the
motion, is denied.

     -- The Court's denial is without prejudice to an application
under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 327 for leave to retain Donlin Recano as a
professional person, for more limited and strictly-defined duties
in the administration of the estate.  The proposed duties shall not
include a purported administration of a part of the court's
official record.

The Debtors are also hiring Donlin Recano as claims, noticing and
balloting agent.  As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on
May 14, 2015, although the Debtors have not yet filed their
schedules of assets and liabilities, they anticipate that there
will be thousands of entities to be noticed.  In view of the number
of anticipated claimants and the complexity of the Debtors'
businesses, the Debtors submit that the appointment of a claims,
noticing and balloting agent is both necessary and in the best
interests of both the Debtors' estates and their creditors.  

For its role as claims, noticing and balloting agent, the Debtors
prior to the bankruptcy filing date provided Donlin Recano a
retainer in the amount of $20,000 and paid prepetition fees and
expenses in the amount of $30,000.

For its professional services, Donlin Recano will charge the
Debtors at these rates:

   Position                                  Hourly Rate
   --------                                  -----------
Senior Bankruptcy Consultant                    $170
Consultant                                      $115
Case Manager/Analyst                         $40 to $70
Technology/Programming Consultant            $60 to $110
Clerical                                         $25

For first day preparation, Schedules/SOFA preparation and
solicitation, the firm will charge the Debtors at these rates:

   Position                                  Hourly Rate
   --------                                  -----------
Senior Bankruptcy Consultant                    $190
Consultant                                      $125
Case Manager/ Analyst                        $40 to $70
Technology/Programming Consultant            $60 to $110
Clerical                                         $25

For its noticing services, Donlin Recano will waive fees for fax
and e-mail noticing.  With respect to claims docketing and
management, the firm will waive fees for Web hosting and Website
development but will charge $0.06 per credit per month for data
storage.  The firm 24/7 global call center will charge the Debtor
at its standard hourly rates.

Donlin Recano represents that it is a "disinterested person" as
that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code with
respect to the matters upon which it is to be engaged.

                     About Magnetation LLC

Magnetation LLC -- http://www.magnetation.com/-- is a joint
venture between Magnetation, Inc. (50.1% owner) and AK Iron
Resources, LLC, an affiliate of AK Steel Corporation (49.9% owner).
Magnetation LLC recovers high-quality iron ore concentrate from
previously abandoned iron ore waste stockpiles and tailings basins.
Magnetation LLC owns iron ore concentrate plants located in
Keewatin, MN, Bovey, MN and Grand Rapids, MN, and an iron ore
pellet plant in Reynolds, IN.  

Magnetation LLC and four subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Minn. Lead Case No. 15-50307) in Duluth,
Minnesota, on May 5, 2015, after reaching a deal with secured
noteholders on a balance sheet restructuring.  The cases are
assigned to Chief Judge Gregory F Kishel.

The Debtors have tapped Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Lapp, Libra,
Thomson, Stoebner & Pusch, Chtd., as attorneys; Blackstone Advisory
Partners LP as financial advisor; and Donlin, Recano & Company,
Inc., as the claims agent.

The Debtor's exclusive period for filing a plan and disclosure
statement ends Sept. 2, 2015.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 12 appointed three creditors of
Magnetation LLC to serve on an official committee of unsecured
creditors.


NEW YORK MILITARY: Taps MacVean Lewis to Handle Business Matters
----------------------------------------------------------------
New York Military Academy asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York for permission to employ the firm of
MacVean, Lewis, Sherwin & McDermott PC to represent it in business
matters including, the sale of assets outside of the ordinary
course of business.

The Debtor anticipates that there will be no duplication of
services of special counsel and the law firm of Lewis D. Wrobel,
Esq., the Debtor's counsel.

The Debtor has been advised that the fees of said law firm are:

         Partners                                $300
         Associates                              $240

The Bankruptcy estate will be responsible for any and all
disbursements incurred by MacVean Lewis representing the Debtors.

To the best of the Debtor's knowledge, the law firm is a
"disinterested person" as that term is defined in Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

                About New York Military Academy

New York Military Academy, a private coeducational boarding school,
filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
15-35379) on March 3, 2015.  David B. Fields signed the petition as
first vice-president.  The Debtor reported total assets of $10.5
million and total debts of $10.9 million.  

Lewis D. Wrobel, Esq., at Lewis D. Wrobel, represents the Debtor as
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed three unsecured creditors
to serve on the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.


NIRVANA INC: Has Interim OK to Use Lenders' Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Diane Davis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of New York gave Nirvana, Inc., et al., interim authority
to use cash collateral securing their prepetition indebtedness.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors are indebted to secured
creditors NBT Bank ("NBT"), the U.S. Small Business Administration,
through the Empire State Certified Development Corp. ("ESCDC/SBA"),
the New York State Business Development Corporation ("NYBDC"), the
Statewide Zone Capital Corporation of New York ("SZCC"), Northeast
Bank/United States Department of Agriculture ("NEB/USDA") and
Comsource, Inc. ("Comsource") in the aggregate principal amount of
$27,204,092.  The Lenders' perfected security interests and liens
cover substantially all of the Debtors' assets, including accounts
receivable and cash.

In the absence of a further order of the Court, the Debtors'
authority to use cash collateral will cease after the earlier to
occur of (i) June 19, 2015, and (ii) the date upon which any
termination event occurs.

In order to adequately protect the Prepetition Secured Lenders'
interest in the cash collateral, the Debtors propose to grant to
each of the lenders, in accordance with their relative priority,
adequate protection rollover liens, subject to a carve-out, to
secure their adequate protection obligations.

A final hearing on the motion will be held on June 25, 2015, at
10:30 a.m., prevailing Eastern Time.  Any objections must be filed
no later than seven days before the Final Hearing and must be
served upon the following:

                        About Nirvana Inc.

Nirvana Inc. is a manufacturer and bottler of spring water that is
captured from four natural springs on 1,600 acres of property
located in the foothills of the Adirondack Mountains at
Forestport,
New York.  Nirvana says its water is exceptionally pure and flows
naturally to the surface at a temperature of 42 degrees
Fahrenheit.

Nirvana is a closely-held New York corporation with a principal
office located at One Nirvana Plaza, Forestport, New York. Nirvana
was formed on June 2, 1995 by Mozafar Rafizadeh and his brother,
Mansur Rafizadeh.

Nirvana, Inc., and three affiliates -- Nirvana Transport, Inc.,
Nirvana Warehousing, Inc. and Millers Wood Development Corp. --
sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Lead Case
No. 15-60823) in Utica, New York, on June 3, 2015.   The cases are
assigned to Judge Diane Davis.

According to the docket, the Debtors' Chapter 11 plan and
disclosure statement are due Oct. 1, 2015.  The deadline for
filing
claims by governmental units is Nov. 30, 2015.

The Debtors tapped Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, as general
counsel, and Teitelbaum & Baskin, LLC, as special counsel.


NOVA CHEMICALS: Fitch Raises Issuer Default Rating From 'BB+'
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded NOVA Chemicals Corporation's Issuer
Default Rating to 'BBB-', its senior unsecured credit facility and
senior unsecured notes at 'BBB-', and affirmed the company's
secured credit facility at 'BBB-'.  The Rating Outlook is revised
to Stable from Positive.

This rating action affects approximately $1.7 billion of debt and
commitments.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The ratings reflect NOVA's position as a low cost ethylene
producer.  NOVA benefits from low cost feedstock at both its
Joffre, Alberta and Corunna, Ontario sites after converting the
Corunna cracker to accept light feedstock.  The company is also
sourcing ethane directly from the Williston (for Joffre) and
Marcellus (for Corunna) basins.  EBITDA margins have increased to
above 20% from levels below 10% in 2009.

Fitch believes NOVA's financial management is conservative.  NOVA
has reduced its debt balances since it was acquired by IPIC PJSC
('AA'/Outlook Stable) in 2009.  Debt has declined from $1.8 billion
at the end of 2009 to $1 billion for the period ended March 31,
2015.  Leverage metrics are strong as well, measuring just below
1.0x on a total debt to operating EBITDA basis at
March 31, 2015.  While distributions to IPIC and capital
expenditures have been growing, Fitch expects future distributions
to be moderate and in line with the financial performance of the
company and capex to decline significantly after the reactor
currently under construction is completed in 2016.

The company is in the midst of executing its NOVA 2020 plan.  NOVA
has completed its transition of the Corunna cracker to all light
feedstock and is in the process of building another polyethylene
reactor at Joffre, which is expected to be completed in mid-2016
and start-up in Q4 2016, adding approximately 1 billion pounds of
new polyethylene capacity.  Capital spending will peak in 2015 and
2016 for these projects, but Fitch expects additional borrowings
will not be necessary given strong cash generation and large cash
balances.

The ratings are constrained by the company's lack of product
diversification.  NOVA produces a variety of polyethylene products
(HDPE, LDPE, and LLDPE) and grades but no other ethylene
derivatives.  NOVA's competitors with other ethylene chains can
direct ethylene production to the highest margin intermediate or
end product.  NOVA's products are also commoditized in nature, with
a number of producers manufacturing similar products.

Fitch acknowledges the cyclical nature of commodity chemicals. NOVA
is dependent upon plastic demand for revenue growth.  Plastics
demand generally tracks global economic growth.  With the decline
in naphtha prices, prices of ethylene and its derivatives have
decreased also, as the highest cost marginal producers are
naphtha-based, mostly in Europe and China.  Fitch expects some
margin contraction for light feedstock producers in the near term,
but a material cost advantage is expected to remain in the long
run.

The advantaged cost position for North American ethylene production
has spurred capacity expansion activity, with large amounts of
North American ethylene production capacity comping online by 2019.
However, Fitch expects at least some of these pre-construction
projects to be cancelled, leaving companies such as NOVA that
brought capacity online earlier to benefit from a return to more
rational margins.  Fitch also expects that North American ethylene
producers as a whole will continue to be low cost due to the
feedstock advantages associated with the shale revolution.

LIQUIDITY
NOVA has robust liquidity that should enable the company to fund
working capital and capital expenditure requirements and to
withstand less favorable industry conditions.  At March 31, 2015,
NOVA had liquidity of $1.4 billion, consisting of $763 million cash
on-hand and $608 million available under its syndicated and
bilateral credit facilities.  Fitch projects marginal negative FCF
after distributions in 2015 and 2016, but cash balances should
enable the company to fund the use of cash without significant
additional borrowings.

NOVA's main $550 million senior secured credit facility, which
matures in December 2018, is governed by a senior debt-to-cash-flow
covenant of max 3.0x and a debt-to- capitalization covenant of max
60%.  NOVA was in compliance with these covenants at
March 31, 2015.  Fitch expects the company to remain in compliance
throughout the lifetime of the facility.  The facility is secured
by NOVA's interest in assets in Canada, including a fixed and
floating charge on certain real property and a security interest in
personal property.

The company has a light maturity schedule with no large principal
payments due until 2023.  NOVA has two notes outstanding, $500
million due in 2023 and $500 million due 2025.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

   -- Capital spending peaks in 2015 and 2016;

   -- Cash balances and internal cash generation sufficient to
      fund capital spending in 2015 and 2016;

   -- Volume increases when capacity at Joffre comes online in Q4
      2016.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Positive: Future developments that may, individually or
collectively, lead to positive rating action include:

   -- Material increase in size, scale, or diversification while
      maintaining strong credit metrics;

   -- Hard credit support from IPIC.

Negative: Future developments that may, individually or
collectively, lead to negative rating action include:

   -- A sustained return of adverse economic conditions and excess

      capacity for the chemical industry leading to weak sales and

      profits;

   -- A sharp erosion of the company's feedstock advantage
      resulting in higher debt funding during the capex build-out
      period;

   -- Expectations for prolonged meaningful negative FCF leading
      to debt levels where leverage is sustained above 2.5x on a
      total debt to EBITDA basis through the cycle;

   -- Substantially increased distributions to IPIC funded by
      debt.

Fitch takes these rating actions on NOVA:

   -- Long-term IDR upgraded to 'BBB-' from 'BB+';

   -- Senior unsecured revolving credit facilities upgraded to
      'BBB-' from 'BB+';

   -- Senior unsecured notes upgraded to 'BBB-' from 'BB+';

   -- Senior secured revolving credit facility at 'BBB-'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.



OCEAN SPRAY: Fitch Affirms 'BB' Rating on $150MM Preferred Stock
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.'s Issuer
Default Rating at 'BBB-'.  The Rating Outlook is Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Strong Market Position

Ocean Spray's credit ratings reflect its dominant share in the
shelf stable cranberry juice and dried cranberry segments.
Importantly, Ocean Spray's strong focus on innovation in their
beverage and snack portfolio mitigates in part a relatively narrow
product line that is mainly dependent on a single fruit.  Ocean
Spray's market position with its premium, highly-recognizable brand
has generated a good level of consistent profitability for a
consumer goods company.  Consequently, Ocean Spray has not
experienced the market share and volume erosion that has occurred
in the shelf stable juice segment during the past several years due
to competition, shift in consumer preferences and consolidation
within the supermarket chains.  Nevertheless, larger,
well-capitalized beverage companies remain a significant threat
given their resources and a wider variety of alternative beverage
options.

Market Leadership, Brand Equity

Ocean Spray is a marketing cooperative that is wholly owned by
approximately 800 cranberry and 40 grapefruit growers.
Approximately 60% of the world-wide cranberry crop is received,
processed, and marketed through Ocean Spray resulting in
approximately $1.7 billion in net sales.  Ocean Spray also has a
material presence in the grapefruit industry.  The cooperative
provides a stable organizational structure for cranberry
grower-owners that greatly supports Ocean Spray's
marketing/advertising, new product development/innovation and
demand planning. Consequently, Ocean Spray has generated material
profitable returns for its grower-owners during the past several
years.

Innovation Key

Ocean Spray will need to continue leveraging innovation efforts
into successful new products and categories to stem on-going
competitive intrusions and create new growth avenues to help
mitigate operating challenges with supply-demand imbalances.  As
part of these efforts, Ocean Spray must also address public
concerns over high sugar content in its products through public
relations campaigns and adaptation of their product portfolio.

As such, PACT cranberry extract water is Ocean Spray's new
cranberry extract water, an important innovation that targets
consumers seeking healthier beverages that are fresh, natural,
flavorful and minimally processed.  PACT cranberry extract water
which has a low sugar content and contains the health promoting
elements inside the cranberry, will be distributed nationally by
PepsiCo, Inc.  Ocean Spray will also likely leverage PACT cranberry
extract water development into other beverage products to improve
health and wellness function.

Financial Flexibility Limited

Ocean Spray's financial flexibility is currently a factor that
constrains the ratings.  Ocean Spray's cooperative status results
in high cash patronage payments of its profits to its grower-owners
leaving the company significantly more reliant on external sources
of liquidity particularly in times of high investment periods.  In
addition, the high member cash payments hinder the company's
ability to deleverage following increases in debt.  As such, Ocean
Spray's narrow product focus and high cash patronage payments are
major elements in limiting the IDR to the 'BBB' category.  Fitch
believes Ocean Spray needs to demonstrate a track record for
reducing debt, increasing the level of growers' equity and
maintaining sufficient external access for liquidity to ensure
appropriate flexibility.

Increased Leverage Expected

Estimated leverage at the end of the second fiscal quarter 2015 was
3.0x, flat to the end of fiscal 2014.  Fitch expects Ocean Spray's
leverage will increase moderately higher to an estimated 3.4x at
the end of fiscal 2015.  This is due to several factors including
the delayed benefit from restructuring pool payments and pool year
advances.  In fiscal 2016, the expectation is for Ocean Spray to
generate excess discretionary cash flow that would reduce leverage
to the low 3x range.

Ocean Spray has minimal off-balance sheet lease obligations as the
company owns the majority of its facilities and most lease
obligations typically relate to office and industrial equipment.
Ocean Spray's upcoming maturities during fiscal 2015 and fiscal
2016 should be relatively modest following the refinancing of term
notes due in fiscal 2016.

Equity Treatment Considerations

Fitch gives Ocean Spray's subordinated debt and preferred stock
each 50% equity treatment based on methodology outlined in Fitch's
hybrid debt criteria report.  Key attributes for both instruments
include the ability to defer coupon payments for up to five years.
Other factors that support 50% equity treatment include the
cumulative nature of the preferred stock dividend and for the
subordinated debt, no cross default or cross acceleration triggers
are present in the event of default on Ocean Spray's senior debt.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:

   -- Modest revenue decline assumed for fiscal 2015.  In fiscal
      2016, Fitch expects Ocean Spray will increase revenue in the

      low single digits;

   -- Cranberry COGS adjustment in the midsingle digit of revenue
      for imputed cost of cranberries;

   -- Gross margins (with cranberry COGS adjustment) in the mid
      20% range for fiscal 2015 and 2016;

   -- In fiscal 2016, Ocean Spray is expected to derive cash flow
      benefits from adjusting grow-owner payment schedules to
      better align grower advances to pool earnings.

   -- Leverage (Debt / adjusted EBITDA) will increase to
      approximately 3.4x at the end of fiscal 2015, before
      declining to the low 3x range in fiscal 2016.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to
a positive rating action include:

   -- Total adjusted debt-to-operating EBITDA sustained below the
      3.0x range due to operating income growth and/or debt
      reduction;

   -- Demonstrated ability to generate discretionary cash flow to
      reduce debt;

   -- Low single-digit revenue growth driven by innovation;

   -- Increase in grower equity to the upper 20% to the low 30%
      range of debt to capitalization;

   -- Per barrel patronage rates reflecting healthy operating
      conditions for Ocean Spray and its member-owners;

   -- EBITDA margins (absent COGS adjustments) sustained at least
      in the low 20% range.

Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to
a negative rating action include:

   -- Total adjusted debt-to-operating EBITDA sustained above mid
      3x range due to materially lower than expected operating
      income, or unanticipated debt-financed acquisitions;

   -- Negative cash deficit over multiyear period driven by higher

      capital investment and working capital requirements funded
      by debt;

   -- Revenue declines in the low to mid-single digits;

   -- EBITDA margins (absent COGS adjustments) sustained below
      20%;

   -- Grower equity as a percent of total capitalization declines
      to the low 20% range or less;

   -- Lack of appropriate level in external liquidity with
      sufficient covenant capacity in the event of a material
      revolver draw-down.

   -- Persistent industry oversupply that causes per barrel
      patronage rates to fall significantly into the $20 per
      barrel range or less for a sustained period of time;

   -- A material adverse outcome associated with the current class

      action lawsuit that requires Ocean Spray to materially
      increase debt;

LIQUIDITY

Ocean Spray's liquidity is supported by its good cash flow
generation and subordinated grower payments.  Fitch believes the
subordinated nature of Ocean Spray's patronage payments to any loan
agreements or preferred stock distribution provides additional
protection and credit enhancing restrictions in the unlikely event
of an unforeseen drop in profitability and cash flow.  The board of
directors for Ocean Spray must approve each patronage payment
allowing the payment to be withheld or adjusted for business needs.


Ocean Spray recently amended and increased the size of its credit
agreement to $820 million including a $300 million revolving
commitment with a $100 million accordion that matures in 2020.
Fitch believes Ocean Spray maintains an appropriate level of
external liquidity with sufficient covenant capacity with the new
amended agreement in the event of a material revolver draw-down.
This also provides Ocean Spray with sufficient cushion if capital
market access becomes limited.  Current cushion under the debt to
consolidated capitalization and consolidated shareholders' equity
covenants are sufficient.

A class action lawsuit was filed against Ocean Spray by a small
group of cranberry growers during 2012. Recent decisions by the
court dismissed 10 out of the 13 counts.  While the litigation
could likely take significant time before a resolution occurs,
Fitch believes the company retains flexibility to mitigate against
the costs required to defend this suit and the potential negative
effects of adverse findings.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed these ratings for Ocean Spray:

   -- Long-term IDR at 'BBB-';
   -- $150 million 6.25% series A preferred stock at 'BB'.



OXANE MATERIALS: Rejects Five Warehouse, Railcar Leases
-------------------------------------------------------
Oxane Materials, Inc., sought and obtained authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston
Division, to reject the following five leases:

   (1) Jenny Lind Warehouse, located at 7209 Jenny Lind Road, Fort
       Smith, Arkansas 72901;

   (2) 5th St. Warehouse, located at 3109 South 5th St., Fort
       Smith, Arkansas 72916;

   (3) E Street Warehouse, located at 100 South E St., Fort Smith,
       Arkansas 72901;

   (4) "Lease of Railway Covered Hopper Cars" with Chicago Fright
       Car Leasing Co., Lease No. 1171, dated November 21, 2011,
       as supplemented by a First Supplement, Second Supplement
       and Third Supplement, for a lease totaling 42 rail cars;
       and

   (5) "Oxane Odessa Agreement" with Francis Drilling Fluids,
       Ltd., dated effective April 1, 2013, for a 20 railcar spot
       located at the Francis Drilling Fluids facility at 3215
       West Murphy, Odessa, Texas 79763.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor ceased any active operations
at the Fort Smith, Arkansas sites covered by the Leases.  There are
currently raw materials stored at each of the sites which were sold
to Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. prepetition, and are no
longer property of the Debtor.  Also, there are certain other
materials which are owned by the Debtor which are located at Jenny
Lind and E Street warehouses, which have been or will be removed
the week of June 1, 2015.

The Debtor told the Court that it does not need the Leases nor the
sites covered by the Leases.  The Debtor is selling its assets, and
does not need the Leases for its bankruptcy case nor does it intend
to assume and assign the Leases.  Continuing to pay rent under the
Leases would be a needless expense and drain on the Debtor's
resources, and nothing more than a burden to the Estate.

                      About Oxane Materials

Oxane Materials, Inc., a developer of nanotechnologies based in
Houston, Texas, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex., Case No. 15-32940), on May 31,
2015.  The case is assigned to Judge Jeff Bohm.

The Debtor's counsel is Morris Dean Weiss, Esq., at Taube Summers
Harrison Taylor Meinzer Brown LLP, in Austin, Texas.


OXANE MATERIALS: Seeks to Hire Miller Egan as Special Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Oxane Materials, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, to
employ Miller Egan Molter & Nelson, LLP, as special corporate
counsel.

The services to be rendered by Miller Egan include, but are not
limited to, (i) preparation of an asset purchase agreement or
agreements and related documents; and (ii) provide additional
services as requested from time to time by the Debtor related to
corporate transaction matters arising from this bankruptcy case.

Miller Egan has agreed to the following rates:

      Classification                       Hourly Rates
      --------------                       ------------
      Partners                             $425-$550/hour
      Administrative/Paraprofessional      $150-$350/hour

In addition, Miller Egan will seek reimbursement of its reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the engagement,
including travel, lodging, duplicating, computer research,
messenger and telephone charges.

Miller Egan currently holds a retainer of $52,620 paid by the
Debtor in April 2015.

Thomas R. Nelson, Esq., a partner at Miller Egan Molter & Nelson,
LLP, in Austin, Texas, assures the Court that his firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtors and their estates.

Mr. Nelson may be reached at:

         Thomas R. Nelson, Esq.
         MILLER EGAN MOLTER & NELSON, LLP,
         221 West Sixth Street, Suite 700
         Austin, TX 78701
         Tel: (512) 685-0201
         Fax: (866) 815-1912
         Email: tom.nelson@MillerEgan.com

                      About Oxane Materials

Oxane Materials, Inc., a developer of nanotechnologies based in
Houston, Texas, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex., Case No. 15-32940), on May 31,
2015.  The case is assigned to Judge Jeff Bohm.

The Debtor's counsel is Morris Dean Weiss, Esq., at Taube Summers
Harrison Taylor Meinzer Brown LLP, in Austin, Texas.


OXANE MATERIALS: Seeks to Tap Kilyk-Bowersox as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Oxane Materials, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, to
employ Kilyk & Bowersox, PLLC, as special corporate counsel.

The services to be rendered by Kilyk-Bowersox include, but are not
limited to: (i) maintaining to the extent asked all of Oxane's
intellectual property patents and trademarks, including filings in
the United States and outside of the United States and assisting in
the due diligence review that will occur with any sale of the
intellectual property of Oxane; and (ii) provide additional
services as requested from time to time by the Debtor related to
intellectual property matters arising from the bankruptcy case.

Kilyk-Bowersox has agreed to the following rates:

      Partners-Members                $450/hour
      Associates                      $330/hour
      Legal Assistants                $100/hour

In addition, Kilyk-Bowersox will seek reimbursement of its
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the
engagement.

Kilyk-Bowersox currently holds a retainer of $50,000 paid by the
Debtor in May 2015.

Luke A. Kilyk, Esq., a founding member of Kilyk & Bowersox, PLLC,
in Warrenton, Virginia, relates that his firm has represented the
Debtor prior to the Petition Date.  The Debtor is seeking to retain
Kilyk-Bowersox as special counsel pursuant to Section 327(e) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

As of the Petition Date, Kilyk-Bowersox was owed $1,181 and
therefore holds a general unsecured claim in the case.  Because the
Debtor is seeking to retain Kilyk-Bowersox pursuant to Section
327(e) and not 327(a), Kilyk-Bowersox only needs to meet the
"interest adverse to the debtor" standard and not the
"disinterestedness test," according to Mr. Kilyk.

Accordingly, Mr. Kilyk assures the Court that his firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtors and their estates.

Mr. Kilyk may be reached at:

         Luke A. Kilyk, Esq.
         KILYK & BOWERSOX, PLLC
         400 Holiday Court, Suite 102
         Warrenton, VA 20186
         Tel: (540) 428-1701
         Fax: (540) 428-1720
         E-mail: general@kbpatentlaw.com

                      About Oxane Materials

Oxane Materials, Inc., a developer of nanotechnologies based in
Houston, Texas, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex., Case No. 15-32940), on May 31,
2015.  The case is assigned to Judge Jeff Bohm.

The Debtor's counsel is Morris Dean Weiss, Esq., at Taube Summers
Harrison Taylor Meinzer Brown LLP, in Austin, Texas.


PARK 91: Taps Tarter Krinsky as General Bankruptcy Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
PARK 91, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York for permission to employ Tarter Krinsky &
Drogin LLP as its general bankruptcy counsel.

To the best of the Debtor's knowledge, TKD is a "disinterested
person" as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

         Scott S. Markowitz, Esq.
         Rocco A. Cavaliere, Esq.
         TARTER KRINSKY & DROGIN LLP
         1350 Broadway, 11th Floor
         New York, NY 10018
         Tel: (212) 216-8000

                           About Park 91

Park 91 LLC is the fee simple owner of a townhouse located at 1145
Park Avenue, New York.  The townhouse is located in the Carnegie
Hill Historic District on Park Avenue and 91st Street.  

Park 91 sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 15-10957) in Manhattan on April 17, 2015.  

Bankruptcy Judge James L. Garrity Jr. presides over the case.  The
Debtor is represented by Scott S. Markowitz, Esq., at Tarter
Krinsky & Drogin LLP, in New York.

According to the docket, the Chapter 11 plan and disclosure
statement are due by Aug. 17, 2015.



PENINSULA HOSPITAL: Trustee Seeks Late OK for LH&M to Include PNH
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lori Lapin Jones, Chapter 11 trustee for Peninsula Hospital Center
and Peninsula General Nursing Home, Inc., filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York a second
supplemental application to employ Lamonica Herbst & Maniscalco,
LLP, as counsel.

By order dated April 4, 2012, the Court approved the employment of
LH&M as general counsel for the Trustee effective as of March 23,
2012.  The employment order, among other things, authorized the
Trustee's employment of LH&M to assist the trustee in the pursuit
and recovery of voidable transfers of the Debtors' assets.

By supplemental application dated Sept. 20, 2012, the Trustee
sought the entry of an amended order to (a) provide that LH&M will
be paid on a contingent fee basis for its legal services with
respect to avoidance actions in the PHC case, and (b) authorize the
Trustee to compensate LH&M on a monthly basis for its legal
services with respect to avoidance actions in the PHC case.  By
amended order dated Oct. 5, 2012, the Court approved the relief
requested in the first supplemental application.

At the time the first supplemental application was filed, the
Trustee had not yet completed her investigation into PNH's
financial affairs or determined that it was necessary to commence
avoidance actions in the PNH case.  LH&M has been assisting the
Trustee in pursuing the avoidance actions in both Debtors' cases by
performing legal services including, but not limited to:

   a) prosecuting avoidance actions as appropriate;

   b) negotiating settlements of avoidance actions; and

   c) performing other services as the trustee deems necessary in
connection with the avoidance actions.

To date, LH&M has been paid a total of $4,873 solely from actual
recoveries in three of the avoidance actions in the PNH case.

Pursuant to the second supplemental application, the Trustee seeks

permission to include LH&M's representation of Peninsula General
Nursing Home, Inc., doing business as Peninsula Center for Extended
Care and Rehabilitation, nunc pro tunc to Aug. 15, 2013.

The Trustee explains that LH&M was previously employed as counsel
to the Trustee by the Employment Order and the scope of LH&M's
employment was expanded by the Amended Employment Order.  At the
time the First Supplemental Application was filed in these
jointly-administered cases, the Trustee had not yet completed her
investigation into PNH's financial affairs or determined that it
was necessary to commence Avoidance Actions in the PNH case.
Eleven Avoidance Actions were subsequently commenced in the PNH
case beginning on Aug. 15, 2013.  A supplemental application to
expand the scope of the Amended Employment Order to include PNH was
inadvertently not filed with the Court at that time.  In
light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding LH&M's
employment, the Trustee submits that nunc pro tunc relief is
reasonable and appropriate here.

                      About Peninsula Hospital

Wayne S. Dodakian, Vinod Sinha, and Shannon Gerardi filed an
involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection against Peninsula
Hospital Center -- http://www.peninsulahospital.org/-- (Bankr.   
E.D.N.Y. Case No. 11-47056) on Aug. 16, 2011.  Marilyn Cowhey
Macron, Esq., at Macron & Cowhey, represents the petitioners.

On Sept. 19, 2011, PHC consented to entry of the order for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and, on that same day,
Peninsula General Nursing Home, Inc. (d/b/a Peninsula Center for
Extended Care and Rehabilitation), filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.  On Sept. 21, 2011,
the Court entered an order for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code.  The Debtors' cases are being jointly administered
in accordance with an order of the Court.

The Debtor disclosed $22.8 million in assets and $34.5 million in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

Judge Elizabeth S. Stong presides over the cases.

The Debtors employed Alvarez & Marsal Healthcare Industry Group,
LLC, as financial advisors.  The Hospital employed Abrams
Fensterman, et al., as their attorneys.  Nixon Peabody served as
their special counsel; GCG, Inc., serves as claims and noticing
agent.

Judge Stong appointed Daniel T. McMurray at Focus Management Group
as patient care ombudsman.  Neubert, Pepe & Monteith P.C. serves
as PCO's counsel.  In April 2013, the bankruptcy court discharged
Daniel T. McMurray from his duties and responsibilities as patient
care ombudsman.

Richard J. McCord, Esq., was appointed by the Court as examiner in
the Debtors' cases.  His task was to conduct an investigation of
the Debtors' relationship and transactions with Revival Home
Health Care, Revival Acquisitions Group LLC, Revival Funding Co.
LLC, and any affiliates.  Mr. McCord's own firm, Certilman Balin,
& Hyman, LLP, served as the Examiner's counsel.

CBIZ Accounting, Tax & Advisory of New York, LLC and CBIZ, Inc.,
serve as financial advisors for the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors.  Robert M. Hirsh, Esq., at Arent Fox LLP, in
New York, N.Y., represents the Committee as counsel.

At the behest of the U.S. Trustee, Lori Lapin Jones, Esq. was
named Chapter 11 Trustee in March 2012, replacing Todd Miller, the
Debtors' Chief Executive Officer.  The Chapter 11 trustee is
represented by LaMonica Herbst & Maniscalco LLP as her counsel.
Storch Amini & Munves, PC, serves as the Chapter 11 Trustee's
special counsel in connection with her investigation of the
Debtors.  She obtained approval to employ Garfunkel Wild, P.C., as
her special health care, regulatory, corporate, finance and
litigation counsel; and Foy Advisors LLC as consultant.



PETROMAROC CORP: Enters Into Waiver Agreement on Debentures
-----------------------------------------------------------
PetroMaroc Corporation plc on June 11 disclosed that it has entered
into a waiver and amending agreement with all three holders of the
Company's Cdn$9.7 million principal amount of debentures issued on
April 10, 2014, to defer payment of the quarterly interest payments
under the Debentures until April 10, 2016, the maturity date of the
Debentures, including the March 31, 2015 interest payment.
Pursuant to the terms of the Waiver Agreement, and subject to the
TSX Venture Exchange approval, the aggregate amount of all Deferred
Interest Payments shall accrue interest at the amended annual
interest rate of 15% and shall be due and owing on the Maturity
Date.  In consideration for entering into the Waiver Agreement, the
Company has agreed to pay to the Debentureholders a fee equal to
15% of the aggregate amount of their respective Deferred Interest
Payments, which Consideration Fee shall be payable on the Maturity
Date in cash. The Waiver Agreement remains subject to the TSXV
approval.

The Company continues to be actively engaged in discussions with
stakeholders to recapitalize the Company.  Strategic and financial
alternatives under consideration are focused on relieving the
financial burden of the Company's current debt structure and
obtaining additional financing necessary to fund ongoing
operations.  There can be no assurance that the current process
will result in a transaction or, if a transaction is undertaken,
that it will be successfully concluded in a timely manner or at
all.  In order to fund current operational commitments and to fund
additional evaluation of Sidi Moktar, PetroMaroc will be required
to complete additional financings and/or incur additional debt in
the future.

                       About PetroMaroc

PetroMaroc -- http://www.petromaroc.co-- is an independent oil and
gas company focused on its significant land position in Morocco.
The Company has a 50 percent operated interest in the Sidi Moktar
license area covering 2,683 square kilometers and is working
closely with Morocco's National Office of Hydrocarbons and Mines
(ONHYM) as a committed long-term partner to unlock the hydrocarbon
potential of the region.  Morocco offers a politically stable
environment to work within and has favorable fiscal terms to energy
producers.  PetroMaroc is a public company listed on the TSX
Venture Exchange under the symbol "PMA".


RADIOSHACK CORP: Files Bankruptcy Plan After Standard General Sale
------------------------------------------------------------------
Dawn McCarty, writing for Bloomberg News, reported that RadioShack
Corp. has filed a bankruptcy liquidation plan explaining how the
remaining assets of the once-iconic, Fort Worth-based consumer
electronics retailer will be distributed.

According to the report, the plan follows the sale of about 1,700
of the chain’s stores -- as well as the rights to its name -- to
a unit of the New York hedge fund Standard General.  The plan filed
on June 12 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware covers what's left
of the company's estate, including some warehouses that are being
sold, the report related.  It doesn't include specific distribution
amounts, but general unsecured creditors and other claimholders
will get a pro rata share of the assets remaining in a liquidating
trust, the report added.

                   About RadioShack Corporation

Headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas, RadioShack (NYSE: RSH) --
http://www.radioshackcorporation.com/-- is a retailer of mobile
technology products and services, as well as products related to
personal and home technology and power supply needs. RadioShack's
retail network includes more than 4,300 company-operated stores in
the United States, 270 company-operated stores in Mexico, and
approximately 1,000 dealer and other outlets worldwide.

RadioShack Corporation and affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-10197) on Feb. 5, 2015. Judge
Kevin J. Carey presides over the case.

David G. Heiman, Esq., Greg M. Gordon, Esq., Amanda M. Suzuki,
Esq., Jonathan M. Fisher, Esq., Thomas A. Howley, Esq., and Paul
M.
Green, Esq., at Jones Day serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy
counsel.

David M. Fournier, Esq., Evelyn J. Meltzer, Esq., and John H.
Schanne, II, Esq., at Pepper Hamilton LLP serve as co-counsel.
Carlin Adrianopoli at FTI Consulting, Inc., is the Debtors'
restructuring advisor. Maeva Group, LLC, is the Debtors'
Turnaround
advisor.  Lazard Freres & Co. LLC is the Debtors' investment
banker.  A&G Realty Partners is the Debtors' real estate advisor.
Prime Clerk is the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

In their Petitions, the Debtors disclosed total assets of $1.2
billion, versus total debts of $1.3 billion.

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and Cooley LLP represent
the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors as co-counsel.  Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc., serves as financial advisor and investment
banker.


REED AND BARTON: Court Approves $22MM Sale of Assets to Lenox Corp.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Henry J. Boroff of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts, Eastern Division, approved the sale of
substantially all of the assets of Reed and Barton Corporation to
an affiliate of Lenox Corporation for $22,000,000.

An auction was conducted on April 28, 2015, and Lenox was declared
the prevailing bidder after submitting a cash bid of $22,000,000,
plus the amount of the break-up fee and expenses reimbursement to
Lifetime Brands, Inc., which served as stalking horse bidder.  To
recall, Lifetime Brands offered $15 million for the Debtor's
assets.

Subsequent to the issuance of the sale approval order, Lifetime
Brands filed an application asking the Bankruptcy Court to direct
the payment of its break-up fee in the sum of $750,000.

Lifetime Brands' counsel, Robert N.H. Christmas, Esq., at Nixon
Peabody LLP, in New York, asserted that Lifetime has made unique,
substantial and valuable contributions to the Debtor's marketing
and sale efforts for its business, at considerable expense to
Lifetime, including (a) substantial internal employee time; (b)
outside professional and advisor expenses; (c) extraordinary
special data conversion efforts, because of the Debtor's declining
workforce, that were essential to prepare for a stable and
efficient transition of the business to the successful purchaser;
and (d) the maintenance of Reed and Barton's presence and showroom
at the April 2015 New York Tabletop Show.

Mr. Christmas said that the total Lifetime internal personnel time
devoted to both the Initial and later Reed and Barton Sale
Processes was approximately 1,490 hours, all of which was at
Lifetime's own expense.  He added that Lifetime has incurred, and
has paid, outside professional fees and disbursements of
approximately $605,751 for legal, financial, insurance and pension
due diligence and SAP system conversion consulting and advice.  Mr.
Christmas told the Court that Lifetime required that the Break-Up
Fee be a condition of the Asset Purchase Agreement because of the
substantial internal and external diligence costs to Lifetime in
entering into the transaction with the Debtor.  He noted that the
Break-Up Fee amount thus reflected a considered projection of the
costs that Lifetime would be required to shoulder.

Judge Boroff, in the sale approval order, overruled the objection
raised by 41 Madison L.P, the landlord of the Debtor's showroom
space on the 7th floor of 41 Madison Avenue, in New York,
complaining that it was not given the opportunity to object to the
Debtor's Proposed Cure Amount, as well as the opportunity to
evaluate adequate assurance issues, and object thereto if
necessary.

The Landlord's counsel, Marc D. Rosenberg, Esq., at Golenbock
Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP, in New York, told the Court that
the Landlord has neither received a Cure Notice nor any other
information regarding the Debtor's proposed Cure Amount as the
Lease was not an Assigned Contract in the potential sale to
Lifetime Brands.

The Debtor is represented by:

          John J. Monaghan, Esq.
          Lynne B. Xerras, Esq.
          Kathleen St. John, Esq.
          HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
          10 St. James Avenue
          Boston, MA 02116
          Telephone: (617)523-2700
          Facsimile: (617)523-6850
          Email: john.monaghan@hklaw.com
                 lynne.xerras@hklaw.com
                 kathleen.stjohn@hklaw.com
Lifetime Brands is represented by:

          Robert N.H. Christmas, Esq.
          NIXON PEABODY LLP
          437 Madison Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212)940-3000
          Facsimile: (212)940-3111
          Email: rchristmas@nixonpeabody.com

41 Madison L.P. Is represented by:

          Marc D. Rosenberg, Esq.
          Michael S. Weinstein, Esq.
          GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR BELL & PESKOE LLP
          437 Madison Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212)907-7300
          Facsimile: (212)754-0330
          Email: Mweinstein@golenbock.com
                 mrosenberg@golenbock.com

             -- and --

          Gary M. Weiner, Esq.
          WEINER LAW FIRM, P.C.
          1441 Main Street, Suite 610
          Springfield, MA 01103
          Telephone: (413)732-6840
          Facsimile: (413)785-5666
          Email: Gweiner@Weinerlegal.com
        
                              About Reed and Barton

Founded in 1824, Reed and Barton Corporation is a designer
and
distributor of high quality silverware and tableware, along
with
flatware, crystal drinkware, picture frames, ornaments, and
baby
giftware. Reed and Barton, which sells products with the
Reed &
Barton, Lunt, R&B EveryDay, and Williamsburg brands, is
based in


Taunton, Massachusetts. The privately held company's stock is

owned by 28 record shareholders who either are descendants of

Henry Reed or trusts for their benefit. Aside from selling its

products in department stores and TV shopping networks, the
company has an on-site factory store in Taunton and a showroom in
Atlanta, Georgia.



Reed and Barton sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D.
Mass. Case No. 15-10534) in Boston, Massachusetts, on Feb.
17,
2015. The case is assigned to Judge Henry J. Boroff.



The Debtor has tapped Holland & Knight, in Boston, as counsel;

Financo, LLC, as investment banker; and Verdolino & Lowey, P.C.,
as accountant. 



The Debtor disclosed $18.3 million in assets and $25.7 million
in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.



The U.S. Trustee for Region 1 appointed three creditors to serve
on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.




REED AND BARTON: Financo Approved as Investment Banker
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts
authorized Reed and Barton Corporation to employ Financo LLC as its
investment banker nunc pro tunc to the Petition Date.

To the best of the Debtor's knowledge, Financo is a "disinterested
person" as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The Court also overruled objections, including that of William K.
Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for Region 1.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on April 14, 2015, the
Trustee objected, on a limited basis, requesting that Financo's
final compensation (fees and expenses) be subject to plenary review
by the Court; and that its indemnification by the Debtor exclude
claims arising from gross negligence, bad faith and disputes
pertaining to the services that Financo has agreed to provide under
its Jan. 30, 2015 engagement letter.

The U.S. Trustee also stated that the Court must direct Financo to
file fee applications, allowing it to conduct a plenary review of
its requested fees and expense reimbursement.

                       About Reed and Barton

Founded in 1824, Reed and Barton Corporation is a designer and
distributor of high quality silverware and tableware, along with
flatware, crystal drinkware, picture frames, ornaments, and baby
giftware.  Reed and Barton, which sells products with the Reed &
Barton, Lunt, R&B EveryDay, and Williamsburg brands, is based in
Taunton, Massachusetts.  The privately held company's stock is
owned by 28 record shareholders who either are descendants of
Henry Reed or trusts for their benefit.  Aside from selling its
products in department stores and TV shopping networks, the
company
has an on-site factory store in Taunton and a showroom in Atlanta,
Georgia.

Reed and Barton sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Mass. Case No. 15-10534) in Boston, Massachusetts, on Feb. 17,
2015.  The case is assigned to Judge Henry J. Boroff.

The Debtor has tapped Holland & Knight, in Boston, as counsel;
Financo, LLC, as investment banker; and Verdolino & Lowey, P.C., as
accountant.

The Debtor disclosed $18.3 million in assets and $25.7 million in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 1 appointed three creditors to serve on
the official committee of unsecured creditors.


RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: Trust Posts Amended Beneficiary Tax Info
-------------------------------------------------------------
The ResCap Liquidating Trust on June 12 disclosed that it has
posted an Amended 2014 Trust Beneficiary Information for U.S.
Federal and State Income Tax Purposes Letter, as well as an Amended
2014 Trust Beneficiary Tax Worksheet for U.S. Federal Income Tax
Purposes for Beneficiaries of Trust Units for the calendar year
2014 to the Trust's website.

The amendments reflect an increase in the Trust's short-term
capital losses from $21,163,791 to $22,794,417 (an increase of
$0.017 per unit) and a corresponding decrease in the Trust's
long-term capital loss of $1,630,626 to a long-term capital gain of
$100,082 (a decrease of $0.017 per unit).  All other amounts are
unchanged.

The 2014 Trust Beneficiary Tax Worksheets for State Specific Income
Tax Purposes for Beneficiaries of Trust Units for the calendar year
2014 will be posted at a later date after all Trust state tax
returns have been completed.  The Trust is targeting the posting of
these worksheets on or before July 15, 2015.

The Trust's website is rescapliquidatingtrust.com  

                     About Residential Capital

Residential Capital LLC, the unprofitable mortgage subsidiary of
Ally Financial Inc., filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 12-12020) on May 14, 2012.

Neither Ally Financial nor Ally Bank is included in the bankruptcy
filings.

ResCap, one of the country's largest mortgage originators and
servicers, was sent to Chapter 11 with 50 subsidiaries amid
"continuing industry challenges, rising litigation costs and
claims, and regulatory uncertainty," according to a company
statement.

ResCap disclosed $15.7 billion in assets and $15.3 billion in
liabilities at March 31, 2012.

Centerview Partners LLC and FTI Consulting are acting as financial
advisers to ResCap.  Morrison & Foerster LLP is acting as legal
adviser to ResCap.  Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP is
the conflicts counsel.  Rubenstein Associates, Inc., is the public
relations consultants to the Company in the Chapter 11 case.
Morrison Cohen LLP is advising ResCap's independent directors.
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLP is the claims and notice agent.

Ray C. Schrock, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in New York, serves
as counsel to Ally Financial.

ResCap sold most of the businesses for a combined $4.5 billion.
The Bankruptcy Court in November 2012 approved ResCap's sale of its
mortgage servicing and origination platform assets to Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC and Walter Investment Management Corporation for $3
billion; and its portfolio of roughly 50,000 whole loans to
Berkshire Hathaway for $1.5 billion.

Judge Martin Glenn in December 2013 confirmed the Joint Chapter 11
Plan co-proposed by Residential Capital and the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.


ROI LAND: Reports $2.62-Mil. Net Loss for 1st Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------
ROI Land Investments Ltd. filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a
net loss of $2.62 million on $18,995 of interest income for the
three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with a net loss of
$1.05 million on $nil of interest income for the same period in
2014.

The Company's balance sheet at March 31, 2015, showed $11.1 million
in total assets, $8.63 million in total liabilities, and
stockholders' equity of $2.49 million.

The Company has incurred cumulative losses since inception of $7.92
million, raising substantial doubt about the ability of the Company
to continue as a going concern.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       http://is.gd/0FbyoM
                          
ROI Land Investments Ltd. specializes in land development
opportunities in Canada and abroad.  Based in Quebec, Canada, the
Company aims to acquire attractive land free of zoning restrictions
to be sold to residential and commercial building developers.


SALADWORKS LLC: Centre Lane Affiliate Acquires Business
-------------------------------------------------------
Saladworks, the nation's first and largest fresh-tossed salad
restaurant chain, on June 15 disclosed that New York-based Centre
Lane Partners LLC has made an investment in the company.  In
addition, the private investment firm has committed to investing
substantial capital to accelerate the company's growth nationwide,
with a strategic focus along the I-95 corridor.  Centre Lane's
investment portfolio includes leading middle market companies in
industries ranging from packaging, to consumer products
manufacturing, franchising and global aviation services.

Saladworks is an iconic Philadelphia Brand with a stable 29-year
history.  The Company's long tenured management team will remain in
place to lead the next phase of growth.  Saladworks President Paul
Steck has been promoted to the position of President/CEO, expanding
his company leadership responsibilities.  Mr. Steck has been with
Saladworks for more than 12 years and is a well-known and respected
executive in the industry.  Saladworks is preparing for growth with
such initiatives as new store design, menu enhancement and an
increase in support to its franchisees.  To support these
objectives and its franchisees, Saladworks plans to increase staff
in the home office by more than 40 percent over a six-month
period.

"We're proud to be affiliated with Centre Lane, a private equity
firm known for aligning itself with businesses that hold the lead
market positions in their categories and offer strong growth
potential," said Mr. Steck, President and CEO, Saladworks.
"Moreover, we're excited about what their support and investment
means in terms of growth of the brand, expanded product and service
offerings to our customers and additional support to our
franchisees."

The acquisition follows a four-month search for a buyer after
Saladworks filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization in
February 2015.  Saladworks customer and franchisees were not
affected by the filing, as all 108 Saladworks' restaurant locations
in the U.S., Canada, Dubai and Singapore remained opened throughout
this process.  Saladworks remains the leader in the made to order,
entree sized salad category with a health conscious consumer base
that lends itself to a fast casual atmosphere.

"Saladworks was the creator of the fresh-tossed salad restaurant
concept and from the beginning has been committed to offering
consumers an exciting dining option that had previously been
unavailable -- fresh, fast and convenient food offerings that fit
today's healthier lifestyles," said Mayank Singh, Managing
Director, Centre Lane Partners.  "For us, this type of focus and
commitment is the hallmark of a wise business investment and we
look forward to partnering with Saladworks to support the company's
growth and success."

"It's clear to us that Centre Lane recognizes both the current
value of our brand and also has the vision to imagine its future
potential.  We're incredibly excited about what lies ahead,"
concluded Mr. Steck.

                About Centre Lane Partners, LLC

Centre Lane -- http://www.CentreLanepartners.com-- is a private
investment firm focused on making equity and debt, control and
non-control, investments in North American middle market companies.
Centre Lane targets companies with revenues between $20 and $500
million that have leading market positions and sustainable
competitive advantages in their respective niches.  

                      About Saladworks, LLC

Developed in 1986, Saladworks, LLC, is the first and largest
fresh-salad franchise concept in the United States.  From its
beginning in the Cherry Hill Mall, Saladworks quickly expanded to
12 additional locations in area malls and soon thereafter began
franchising.  The company has franchise agreements with 162
different franchisees.  The equity owners are J Scar Holdings,
Inc., (70%) and JVSW LLC (30%).

Saladworks, LLC, sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 15-10327) on
Feb. 17, 2015.  The case assigned to Judge Laurie Selber
Silverstein.

The Debtor has tapped Landis Rath & Cobb LLP as counsel; SSG
Advisors, LLC, as investment banker; EisnerAmper LLP, as financial
advisor; and Upshot Services LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

Saladworks, LLC, disclosed $2,303,632 in assets and $14,220,722 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.

The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of Saladworks LLC
appointed three creditors of the company to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors.

The case is In re: Pennysaver USA LLC, case number 1:15-bk-11196,
in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.


SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL: Seth Schalow OK'd as Restructuring Consultant
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Henry J. Borroff of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts authorized Steven Weiss, Chapter 11
trustee for Spectrum Analytical, Inc., et al., to employ Seth
Schalow as a restructuring consultant for the estates.

Judge Borroff also ordered that Mr. Schalow will not perform any
forensic analysis or investigation of the financial transactions
for the Debtors or of Mark Russo, as receiver, and that Mr.
Schalow's claims for fee for the period of May 1, to May 11, 2015
are waived.

                     About Spectrum Analytical

Spectrum Analytical Inc. provides testing and analytical data for
environmental interests.  Hanibal Technology LLC serves as
Spectrum's exclusive international marketing and sales agent, and
focuses on education, research, and development in environmental
technology.  Spectrum maintains offices in Agawam, Massachusetts,
Tampa, Florida, North Kingstown, Rhode Island, and Syracuse, New
York.

Spectrum Analytical and Hanibal Technology commenced Chapter 11
bankruptcy cases (Bankr. D. Mass. Case Nos. 15-30404 and 15-30405)
on April 30, 2015, to retake management of their business and
assets from the receiver installed by their lender.  Hanibal Tayeh,
the sole member, signed the bankruptcy petitions.

Spectrum disclosed $8,658,751 in assets and $1,987,714 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.  Hanibal estimated less
than $10 million in assets and debt.

Bacon Wilson, P.C., serves as the Debtors' counsel.


SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL: Shatz Schwartz OK'd as Trustee's Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Henry J. Borroff of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts authorized Steven Weiss, Chapter 11
trustee for Spectrum Analytical, Inc., et al., to employ Shatz
Schwartz and Fentin. P.C., as his counsel.

To the best of the trustee's knowledge, Shatz is a "disinterested
person" as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at Shatz, Schwartz and Fentin, P.C., 1441
Main Street, Suite 1100, Springfield, Massachusetts.

                     About Spectrum Analytical

Spectrum Analytical Inc. provides testing and analytical data for
environmental interests.  Hanibal Technology LLC serves as
Spectrum's exclusive international marketing and sales agent, and
focuses on education, research, and development in environmental
technology.  Spectrum maintains offices in Agawam, Massachusetts,
Tampa, Florida, North Kingstown, Rhode Island, and Syracuse, New
York.

Spectrum Analytical and Hanibal Technology commenced Chapter 11
bankruptcy cases (Bankr. D. Mass. Case Nos. 15-30404 and 15-30405)
on April 30, 2015, to retake management of their business and
assets from the receiver installed by their lender.  Hanibal Tayeh,
the sole member, signed the bankruptcy petitions.

Spectrum disclosed $8,658,751 in assets and $1,987,714 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.  Hanibal estimated less
than $10 million in assets and debt.

Bacon Wilson, P.C., serves as the Debtors' counsel.


SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL: TechKnowledgey Approved as Trustee's Broker
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Henry J. Borroff of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of  Massachusetts authorized Steven Weiss, Chapter 11
trustee for Spectrum Analytical, Inc., et al., to employ
TechKnowledgey Strategic Group, as his business broker.

The trustee agreed to pay TSG:

   -- 2.5% of the consideration paid up to $4,000,000;

   -- 3.5% of the consideration received in excess of $4,000,000,
      up to $6,000,000; and

   -- 5% of the consideration received in excess of $6,000,000.

The trustee is also authorized to pay TSG a retainer of $10,000,000
toward out of pocket expenses, subject to final allowance by the
Court.

Steven Maxwell, owner of TSG with an address at 443 Mountain View
Road, Boulder, Colorado, assured the Court that TSG has no interest
adverse to the Debtor.

                    About Spectrum Analytical

Spectrum Analytical Inc. provides testing and analytical data for
environmental interests.  Hanibal Technology LLC serves as
Spectrum's exclusive international marketing and sales agent, and
focuses on education, research, and development in environmental
technology.  Spectrum maintains offices in Agawam, Massachusetts,
Tampa, Florida, North Kingstown, Rhode Island, and Syracuse, New
York.

Spectrum Analytical and Hanibal Technology commenced Chapter 11
bankruptcy cases (Bankr. D. Mass. Case Nos. 15-30404 and 15-30405)
on April 30, 2015, to retake management of their business and
assets from the receiver installed by their lender.  Hanibal Tayeh,
the sole member, signed the bankruptcy petitions.

Spectrum disclosed $8,658,751 in assets and $1,987,714 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.  Hanibal estimated less
than $10 million in assets and debt.

Bacon Wilson, P.C., serves as the Debtors' counsel.



SRB INTERNATIONAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: SRB International L.L.C.
        1512 W 610 N
        Lindon, UT 84042

Case No.: 15-25505

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 12, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Utah (Salt Lake City)

Judge: Hon. Kimball R. Mosier

Debtor's Counsel: Anna W. Drake, Esq.
                  ANNA W. DRAKE, P.C.
                  175 South Main Street, Suite 300
                  Salt Lake City, UT 84111
                  Tel: (801) 328-9792
                  Fax: (801) 413-1620
                  Email: annadrake@att.net

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Sasha R. Brown, manager.

A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/utb15-25505.pdf


SSH HOLDINGS: S&P Affirms 'B' Corporate Credit Rating
-----------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'B' corporate
credit rating on SSH Holdings Inc., the direct parent of Egg Harbor
Township, N.J.-based Spencer Spirit Holdings Inc.  The outlook is
stable.  At the same time, S&P affirmed the 'B' issue-level rating
on the company's first-lien secured term loan and revised the
recovery rating to '4' from '3', indicating S&P's expectation of
average recovery in the event of a payment default toward the
higher end of the 30% to 50% range.

According to the company, it will use the proceeds of the proposed
first-lien term loan add-on to buy out the remaining minority
position owned by the equity sponsor.

"The affirmation reflects our expectation that operating
performance and credit metrics will remain generally stable,
despite some modest increase in leverage following the new debt
issuance.  Our assessment also reflects Spencer’s participation
in the highly competitive and fragmented specialty teen apparel and
gift industry, which is facing declining mall traffic and
heightened price competition from fast-fashion and online players,"
said credit analyst Mathew Christy.  "It also reflects Spirit's
exposure to the seasonal Halloween business and the challenges,
albeit well managed, involved in opening and closing about 1,100
pop-up stores within a few months every year. Management has
successfully expanded the Spirit store count in recent years, but
we expect slower growth for the Halloween business base in the next
three years, with continued capital spending directed toward
e-commerce, which is growing at a relatively rapid clip."

The stable outlook incorporates S&P's expectation that performance
will remain relatively flat over the next year, with Spencer only
modestly reducing debt with cash flow generation.  Although S&P
forecasts some modest improvement in the company's credit
protection measures, it believes they will remain commensurate with
an "aggressive" financial risk profile over the 12 to 24 months.

S&P could lower the rating if performance falls significantly below
S&P's projections because of flat sales and margin contraction, a
result of a decline in traffic or inability to boost transaction
levels.  Under this scenario, revenue would turn flat to slightly
negative and gross margin would shrink more than 200 bps, with
leverage approaching the 5.0x area.  This would cause S&P to revise
its financial risk profile to "highly leveraged".

To consider an upgrade, Spencer's performance would need to improve
ahead of S&P's expectations, with revenue growth in the 15% range
as a result of faster-than-anticipated store growth or gross margin
expansion of more than 200 bps through greater-than-projected
sourcing and other cost savings.  At that time, leverage would be
in the mid-to-high-3.0x range and FFO to debt would be in the 20%
range, which would cause S&P to revise its financial risk profile
assessment to "significant".  S&P would also need to believe that
the company’s financial policy would support credit metrics
sustaining at these levels and releveraging is unlikely.



SURNA INC: Needs Additional Financing to Cover for Losses
---------------------------------------------------------
Surna Inc. filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $1.42
million on $871,000 of revenue for the three months ended March 31,
2015, compared with a net loss of $53,600 on $nil of revenue for
the same period last year.

The Company's balance sheet at March 31, 2015, showed $2.65 million
in total assets, $4.39 million in total liabilities and a
stockholders' deficit of $1.74 million.

The Company has generated cumulative net losses of $7.19 million
during the period from inception through March 31, 2015.  

In the course of its development activities, the Company has
sustained and continues to sustain losses.  The Company cannot
predict if or when the Company will generate profits.  The Company
expects to finance its operations primarily through debt or equity
financing.  On March 28, 2014, the Company commenced a private
placement in the form of convertible promissory notes for up to $5
million ("Initial Private Placement").  On Oct. 16, 2014, the
Company closed the Initial Private Placement in which it raised
$1.34 million and filed a Form D with the SEC disclosing the
closing of the Initial Private Placement.

In October 2014, subsequent to the closing of the Initial Private
Placement, the Company engaged Newbridge Securities Corporation to
act on a "best efforts" basis as a placement agent for the Company
in connection with the structuring, issuance, and sale of debt
and/or equity "Securities" to obtain up to $3 million in additional
capital.  For this purpose, the Company sold Securities, which are
defined as up to 60 Units (each, a "Unit") with each Unit
consisting of (i) Two Hundred Fifty Thousand (250,000) shares of
the Company's common stock, par value $0.00001; (ii) a $50,000 10%
Convertible Note; and (iii) 50,000 Warrants for the purchase of
50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  Through March 31,
2015, the Company had raised $2.54 million.

These conditions may raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern without the raising of
necessary additional financing, according to the regulatory
filing.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       http://is.gd/vThU7V
                          
Surna Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes systems for
controlled environment agriculture (CEA).  It offers indoor climate
control systems, including chillers, lights, reflectors, and
irrigation systems, for use in conjunction with cannabis and CEA
industry.  The company serves cannabis cultivation facilities; and
other indoor agricultural producers, including organic herb and
vegetable producers.  Surna Inc. was incorporated in 2009 and is
headquartered in Boulder, Colorado.


TEXAS REGENCY: Section 341 Meeting Set for July 14
--------------------------------------------------
There will be a meeting of creditors in the bankruptcy case of
Texas Regency Apartments, L.P. on July 14, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. at
Houston, 515 Rusk Suite 3401.

Deadline to file proofs of claim is Oct. 13, 2015.

This is the first meeting of creditors required under Section
341(a) of the Bankruptcy Code in all bankruptcy cases.

All creditors are invited, but not required, to attend.  This
meeting of creditors offers the one opportunity in a bankruptcy
proceeding for creditors to question a responsible office of the
Debtor under oath about the company's financial affairs and
operations that would be of interest to the general body of
creditors.

Texas Regency Apartments, L.P., owner of the Regency Square
Apartments at 7222 Bellerive Dr., Houston, Texas, sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 15-33188) in Houston, Texas,
on June 10, 2015.  Gordon Steele signed the petition chief
financial officer.  The Debtor disclosed total assets of $11.1
million and total liabilities of $11.4 million.

The Debtor tapped Matthew Hoffman, Esq., at the Law Offices of
Matthew Hoffman, P.C., as counsel.

Judge David R. Jones presides over the case.


TRANSCOASTAL CORP: Reports $383K Net Loss in Q1 Ending Mar. 31
--------------------------------------------------------------
TransCoastal Corporation filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $383,000 on $665,000 of revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with a net loss of
$106,0000 on $1.03 million of revenues for the same period last
year.  The Company's balance sheet at March 31, 2015, showed $25.2
million in total assets, $20.3 million in total liabilities, and
stockholders' equity of $4.91 million.  A copy of the Form 10-Q is
available at http://is.gd/TKRdDI

                  About TransCoastal Corporation

TransCoastal Corporation is engaged in the exploration, development
and production of natural gas and oil properties in the United
States and Canada.  Dallas-based TCEC has been focused on its
drilling operations in Texas and the southwestern region of the
U.S. Since 2000.

TransCoastal reported a net loss of $1.69 million on $4.55
million of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014,
compared to a net loss of $4.05 million on $3.62 million of total
revenues in the prior year.

Whitley Penn LLP expressed substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern, citing that the Company has
an accumulated deficit, a working capital deficit and a net loss
from operations.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2014, showed $25.4 million
in total assets, $20.1 million in total liabilities and total
stockholders' equity of $5.29 million.



TRIMEDYNE INC: Posts $202K Net Loss in March 31 Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------
Trimedyne, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss
of $202,000 on $1.19 million of net revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $11,000 on $1.38
million of net revenues for the same period in 2014.

The Company's balance sheet at March 31, 2015, showed $4.03 million
in total assets, $788,000 in total liabilities and total
stockholders' equity of $3.24 million.

At March 31, 2015, the Company had working capital of $2.08
compared to $2.41 million at the end of the fiscal year ended Sept.
30, 2014. Cash decreased by $714,000 to $578,000 from $1.29 million
at Sept. 30, 2014.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company has cash on hand of $578,000.  It
intends to fund operations with cash on hand and from operations,
however, additional working capital in the next 12 months will be
required based upon its current expenditure rate.  These factors
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern, according to the regulatory filing.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       http://is.gd/qRe03Q
                          
Irvine, Calif.-based Trimedyne, Inc., is engaged in the
development, manufacturing and marketing of 80 and 30 watt Holmium
"cold" pulsed lasers and a variety of disposable and reusable,
fiber optic laser energy delivery devices for use in a broad array
of medical applications.



TRINITY INDUSTRIES: Fitch Retains 'BB+' Subordinated Notes Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
While the recent guardrail judgment against Trinity Industries Inc.
could potentially weaken the company's credit metrics if payment is
required in the near term, Fitch Ratings expects TRN's operating
performance will enable it to rebuild metrics quickly in such a
scenario.

Fitch believes TRN has the capacity to fund litigation payments of
as much as $600 million without borrowing, which is somewhat less
than the amount of the $682 million judgment.  As a result,
leverage would increase modestly if debt is used to help fund the
litigation payment.  Payment of the judgment would also reduce
TRN's liquidity and increase its sensitivity to its cyclical
markets.  However, a lengthy litigation process could provide time
for TRN to generate FCF and improve its ability to fund the
judgment as well as other litigation payments that might arise.

Debt/EBITDA of 0.9x at March 31, 2015 and FFO Adjusted Leverage of
2.0x are at solid levels that support TRN's current ratings, partly
reflecting the company's rail business that is in a strong part of
the cycle.  Fitch expects mid-cycle leverage (gross manufacturing
debt/manufacturing EBITDA) to be approximately 1.0x to 1.5x,  which
incorporates flexibility to adjust to eventual downturns in TRN's
cyclical end markets and support the company's leasing business.

In addition to the judgment, litigation risks include related cases
involving other states and class action shareholder lawsuits that
could lead to additional significant penalties or fines.  Some of
these cases are in an early stage, but if TRN's cash is
insufficient to fund such liabilities, such litigation payments
could result in higher debt and leverage and weaken TRN's credit
profile.  Also, TRN has received a subpoena from U.S. Department of
Justice for documents related to TRN's guardrail end-terminal
products.  Fitch expects TRN will appeal the judgment if
post-judgment motions planned by the company do not result in
rulings favorable to TRN.  TRN expects to obtain an appeal bond on
an unsecured basis.

Fitch estimates manufacturing FCF in 2015 will be near $250 million
compared to $153 million in 2014.  Fitch expects TRN's operating
results will improve due to incremental revenue from Meyer Steel
Structures acquired in August 2014 and continued strong railcar
sales.  FCF excludes cash flow at TRN's leasing business which
Fitch estimates could decline slightly from roughly $100 million in
2014 before considering proceeds from asset sales, primarily
railcars.

TRN's liquidity at March 31, 2015 included $691 million of
consolidated cash and short-term marketable securities, most of
which is held at the manufacturing businesses.  In addition, $336
million was available under a revolving credit facility.  In May
2015, TRN replaced the existing $425 million facility scheduled to
mature in October 2016 with a $600 million five-year facility.
There are no material scheduled long-term debt maturities scheduled
prior to 2024 at the manufacturing business.  Debt used to fund
TILC's leasing operations totaled approximately $2.7 billion,
including partially owned subsidiaries, and nearly all of the debt
is non-recourse.

Fitch's current ratings for TRN are:

Trinity Industries Inc.
   -- Issuer Default Rating 'BBB-';
   -- Senior unsecured revolving credit facility 'BBB-';
   -- Senior unsecured notes 'BBB-'
   -- Subordinated convertible notes 'BB+'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The ratings affect approximately $850 million of manufacturing debt
outstanding at March 31, 2015.



TROCOM CONSTRUCTION: June 17 Hearing on Continued Use of Cash
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York
signed a consent order authorizing, on an interim basis, Trocom
Construction Corp., to use cash collateral and provide adequate
protection to Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, also known
as M&T Bank, 460 Kingsland Avenue Real Estate LLC and Reveal
Kingsland LLC.  The Court has signed several orders authorizing the
interim use of cash collateral.

The latest order stated that the Debtor may use the cash collateral
until June 18, 2015, although the budget runs until July 7, 2015;
and the Debtor may not make payment to  Liberty Mutual Insurance
Company for bond premiums.

The hearing for the approval of a final stipulated order will be
held on June 17, at 2:00 p.m. before the Hon. Nancy Hershey Lord.

The Debtor's revenue is attributable to its municipal customers,
including the New York City Department of Design and Construction,
Parks Department and Economic Development Corp.  All of the
Debtor's municipal customers require that the Debtor furnish one or
more surety bonds to secure the Debtor's payment or performance
obligations under the applicable construction contract.
Consequently, in the ordinary course of its business, the Debtor
has arranged for Liberty Mutual to issue surety bonds on the
Debtor's behalf for the benefit of its customers and to secure the
Debtor's obligations to pay its subcontractors and suppliers for
those contracts bonded by Liberty Mutual.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor has approximately 28
outstanding Surety Bonds issued by the Surety.  The aggregate penal
sums of these bonds total approximately $176,051,193.

The Debtor acknowledges that the amount outstanding under the
credit line, the master lease, and retail installment contract as
of the Petition Date is $6,277,597, $436,884, and $6,402,
respectively.

Prior to the Petition Date, two entities affiliated with the
Guarantors, 460 Kingsland Avenue Realty LLC and Reveal Kingsland
LLC each made a cash infusion of $250,000 for the Debtor's working
capital secured by a blanket lien on the Debtor's assets
subordinate to M&T, all of which is due and owing by the Debtor to
460 and Reveal.

As adequate protection from any diminution in value of the lenders'
collateral, the Debtor will grant to the lenders replacement liens
on all property of the Debtor and its estate.

The Debtor will also make monthly adequate protection payments to
M&T in the amount of $46,197 each, the first of which will be made
on June 1, 2015, and thereafter on the 1st day of each and every
month during the budget period.  Additionally, the Debtor will
tender monthly payments of $29,763 to Newfound LLC for postpetition
use and occupancy.

                      M&T Bank's Objections

Lender M&T made several objections to the Debtor's continued access
to the cash collateral.

In its objection, M&T stated that the proposed 30-day budget shows
a $2.7 million shortfall.  M&T noted that the Debtor proposed to
pay to the surety a prepetition claim in the excess of $165,000.
In this relation, entry of the final order must be conditioned upon
the deletion of that amount in the proposed 30 day budget, M&T told
the Court.

In a previous objection, M&T asserted that it is not adequately
protected.  M&T noted that approximately half of the $19 million in
claims against the city are in litigation in State Court, are
disputed by the City, and are far from resolutions and uncertain of
recovery.  The other half of the claims have not yet been put into
litigation yet. In addition, despite numerous promises, M&T has not
yet been provided with the audit report of the Debtor's surety
revealing the amount of the claims of trust beneficiaries.
Accordingly, M&T has not been able to confirm that it is adequately
protected.

M&T, in its first objection, requested that the Court permit the
Debtor to maintain its DIP bank accounts at M&T Bank and that any
order granting interim use of cash collateral and provide that the
maintenance of such accounts at M&T is a condition of the use of
cash collateral.

M&T Bank is represented by:

         Richard J. McCord, Esq.
         Thomas McNamara, Esq.
         CERTILMAN BALIN ADLER & HYMAN, LLP
         90 Merrick Avenue
         East Meadow, NY 11554
         Tel: (516) 296-7000

Liberty Mutual is represented by:

         Scott A. Zuber, Esq.
         CHIESA SHAHINIAN & GIANTOMASI, P.C.
         One Boland Drive
         West Orange, NJ 07052
         Tel: (973) 325-1500


The Debtor is represented by:

         Bonnie Pollack, Esq.
         C. Nathan Dee, Esq.
         CULLEN & DYKMAN, LLP
         100 Quentin Roosevelt Blvd.
         Garden City, NY 11530
         Tel: (516) 357-3700

                     About Trocom Construction

Trocom Construction Corp. formed in 1969 by Salvatore Trovato.
Trocom is in the heavy construction business.  Its primary customer
is the City of New York through its various agencies.  The company
has 75 employees, the majority of whom are members of various
unions.  Joseph Trovato is presently the president and holder of
100% of the voting shares of Trocom.

Trocom commenced a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case
No. 15-42145) on May 7, 2015, in Brooklyn.  

Judge Nancy Hershey Lord presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped
Cullen & Dykman, LLP, as its general bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and less
than $10 million in debt.

According to the docket, the Chapter 11 plan and disclosure
statement are due Sept. 4, 2015.



VICTORY MEDICAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor affiliates filing separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions:

    Debtor                                       Case No.
    ------                                       --------
    Victory Medical Center Mid-Cities, LP        15-42373
    2201 Timberloch, Suite 200
    The Woodlands, TX 77380  

    Victory Medical Center Mid-Cities GP, LLC    15-42376
    
    Victory Medical Center Plano, LP             15-42377
   
    Victory Medical Center Plano GP, LLC         15-42378
    
    Victory Medical Center Craig Ranch, LP       15-42379
    
    Victory Medical Center Craig Ranch GP, LLC   15-42381

    Victory Medical Center Landmark, LP          15-42382

    Victory Medical Center Landmark GP, LLC      15-42383
    
    Victory Parent Company, LLC                  15-42384

Type of Business: Health Care

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 12, 2015

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas (Ft. Worth)

Judge: Hon. Russell F. Nelms

Debtors' Counsel: Melissa A. Haselden, Esq.
                  HOOVER SLOVACEK, LLP
                  Galleria Tower II
                  5051 Westheimer, Suite 1200
                  Houston, TX 77057
                  Tel: 713.977.8686
                  Fax: 713.977.5395
                  Email: Haselden@hooverslovacek.com

                    - and -

                  Josh T. Judd, Esq.
                  HOOVER SLOVACEK LLP
                  Galleria II
                  5051 Westheiner, Suite 1200
                  Houston, TX 77056
                  Tel: (713) 977-8686
                  Fax: (713) 977-5395
                  Email: judd@hooverslovacek.com

                    - and -

                  Edward L. Rothberg, Esq.
                  HOOVER SLOVACEK LLP
                  Galleria Tower II
                  5051 Westheimer, Suite 1200
                  Houston, TX 77057
                  Tel: (713) 977-8686
                  Fax: (713) 977-5395
                  Email: rothberg@hooverslovacek.com

Debtors'          BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL &
Special           BERKOWITZ, PC
Counsel:

Debtors'          EPIQ BANKRUPTCY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Claims,
Noticing and
Balloting
Agent:

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Debts: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Robert N. Helms, Jr., manager of G.P.,
Victory Medical Center Mid-Cities GP, LLC.

Consolidated List of Debtors' 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Helix Medical Group                     Trade          $863,606
3001 Know St
Suite 405
Dallas, TX 75205
jamesregester@hotmail.com

Suture Express, Inc.                    Trade          $487,141
P.O. Box 842806
Kansas City, MO 64184-2806
Tel: 913.384-2220x315
melody@sutureexpress.com

Vision Ortho, LLC                       Trade          $393,060
14215 Proton Road
Dallas, TX 75244
Tel: 214.405.2870
manderson@acuitysurgical.com

Valmed                                  Trade          $312,170
2140 E. Southlake Blvd
L-508
Southlake, TX 76092
Tel: 817.605.6050
isbellmel@gmail.com

Matt Media & Technology                 Trade          $300,000
7212 Thames Trail
Colleyville, TX 76034
Tel: 817.312.7768

Cnl Healthcare Properties, Inc.         Trade          $297,986
c/o Lincoln Harris Csg
6688 North Central Expressway
Dallas, TX 75206

Medical Information Technology, Inc.    Trade          $277,043
P.O. Box 74569
Chicago, IL 60696
Tel: 781.774.4513
lboyle@meditech.com

Omni Acquisition Inc. DBA Spine 360     Trade          $217,489

St Jude Medical                         Trade          $211,620

Allosource                              Trade          $162,125

Centinel Spine                          Trade          $152,065

Spine Smith                             Trade          $149,351

Alphatec Spine Inc.                     Trade          $148,189

Dell Marketing LP                       Trade          $137,764

Biomet, Inc.                            Trade          $131,002

X-spine Systems, Inc                    Trade          $101,416

SHC Services, Inc                       Trade           $95,625

McKesson Medical Surgical, Inc          Trade           $90,912

Intercede Health                        Trade           $88,622

GTR Medical Group LLC                   Trade           $83,305


VICTORY MEDICL: Files for Ch. 11 to Sell Hospital to Nobilis
------------------------------------------------------------
Victory Parent Company, LLC, which manages six for-profit Victory
Healthcare medical and surgical centers in Texas, on June 12 filed
voluntarily under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the
Northern District of Texas in Fort Worth.  Concurrently, Victory
intends to file a motion for an accelerated sale of its Victory
Medical Center in Plano, Tex. to Nobilis, which recently purchased
the company's Victory Medical Center Houston in the Texas Medical
Center.  The Company has many interested buyers for its centers
regarding this process, and has already received Letters of Intent
for its centers.

Included in the Chapter 11 filing are Victory Healthcare facilities
in Hurst ("Mid-Cities"), McKinney ("Craig Ranch"), Plano, and San
Antonio ("Landmark").  Excluded from the filing are Victory Medical
Center Beaumont and Victory Medical Center Houston-East, which have
buyers in place outside of the Court process.

According to Robert N. Helms, Jr., Chairman, CEO and Manager of
Victory, the filing was necessitated by a temporary restraining
order associated with a pending lawsuit.  This order, which had
blocked the Plano facility sale, is now stayed under bankruptcy
law.

"We had built an extremely high quality, state-of-the-art group of
community-centric medical centers and hospitals," Mr. Helms stated.
"Unfortunately, as out-of-network providers, we came under attack
by large insurance carriers.  Even though we were able to execute
in-network agreements with three large insurers, the extreme
slowness and lack of payment from the carriers constrained
liquidity significantly.  We have responded by reducing expenses
and changing our facilities to provide fewer services and kept our
emergency rooms open.  Unfortunately, now we have no other choice
except to sell our facilities with the intent of remunerating
secured and unsecured creditors alike.

"The Chapter 11 filing will allow us to continue operating without
interruption while we conduct the sales under Section 363 of the
Code.  The automatic stay that went into effect with the filing of
the petitions will allow our existing funds to support our
operations during this time period.  We pledge to continue
providing the same high level of service in our facilities that has
distinguished our organization to date.  I also want to extend a
personal note to the remaining 160 employees at the affected
medical centers and corporate office, and the many doctors and
other medical professionals who have stood with us through a time
of great challenge.  There is no finer team of medical and
management personnel in the state of Texas."

The company is submitting its motions to the Court to maintain
business in the ordinary course, including employee compensation
and benefits, which is commonplace in such cases.  The company's
vendors will be paid in the ordinary course going forward.  The
company hopes to complete the necessary sales on an expedited
basis, or within the next two months.

Victory is being advised by Hoover Slovacek, LLP and Baker Donelson
as legal counsel.  For additional information about the filing,
please visit http://dm.epiq11.com/VPC

                About Victory Parent Company, LLC

Headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas, Victory Parent Company, LLC
manages six medical centers in Texas.  Founded in 2005, Victory now
maintains medical centers offering emergency room services in
through Victory Medical Center Mid-Cities in Hurst, Victory Medical
Center Plano, Victory Medical Center Craig Ranch in McKinney, and
Victory Medical Center Landmark in San Antonio.  The company also
manages its Victory Medical Center Beaumont and Houston-East, which
are not part of the Chapter 11 filing and will be sold separately.
A privately held company, Victory employs approximately 160 people.


WAYNE COUNTY, MI: Selling Notes Amid Possibility of Bankruptcy
--------------------------------------------------------------
Karen Pierog, writing for Reuters, reported that Michigan's Wayne
County plans to sell nearly $187 million of general obligation
limited-tax notes, while warning potential investors that it could
be headed to federal bankruptcy court.

According to the report, the note sale is part of about $8 billion
of debt expected to be offered in the U.S. municipal bond market.
Wayne County said if its plan to address chronic budget deficits by
curbing pension and healthcare benefits and cutting wages is not
implemented, the state of Michigan is likely to appoint an
emergency manager, who could recommend a Chapter 9 municipal
bankruptcy filing, Reuters said, citing offering documents for the
note deal.

                         *     *     *

The Troubled Company Reporter, on March 16, 2015, reported that
Fitch Ratings has downgraded the ratings for the following Wayne
County, Michigan bonds:

-- $186.3 million limited tax general obligation (LTGO) bonds
    issued by Wayne County to 'B' from 'BB-';

-- $51.3 million building authority (stadium) refunding bonds,
   series 2012 (Wayne County LTGO) issued by Detroit/Wayne County
   Stadium Authority to 'B' from 'BB-';

-- $203.5 million building authority bonds issued by Wayne County
   Building Authority to 'B' from 'BB-';

-- Wayne County unlimited tax general obligation (ULTGO) (implied)
   to 'B' from 'BB'.

On Feb. 10, 2015, the TCR reported that Moody's Investors Services
has downgraded to Ba3 from Baa3 the rating on the general
obligation limited tax (GOLT) debt of Wayne County, MI. The county
has a total of $695 million of long-term GOLT debt outstanding, of
which $336 million is rated by Moody's.  An additional $302
million
of short-term GOLT delinquent tax anticipation notes are
outstanding. The outlook remains negative.

The TCR, on Feb. 9, 2015, also reported that Fitch Ratings has
placed the following Wayne County ratings on Rating Watch
Negative:

  -- $190.9 million limited tax general obligation (LTGO) bonds
     issued by Wayne County 'BB-';

  -- $54.9 million building authority (stadium) refunding bonds,
     series 2012 (Wayne County LTGO) issued by Detroit/Wayne
     County Stadium Authority 'BB-';

  -- $207.2 million building authority bonds issued by Wayne
     County Building Authority 'BB-';

  -- Wayne County unlimited tax general obligation (ULTGO)
     (implied) 'BB'.


WP CPP: S&P Affirms 'B' Corp. Credit Rating, Outlook Remains Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said that it has affirmed its
'B' corporate credit rating on WP CPP Holdings LLC.  The outlook
remains stable.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B' issue-level ratings on the
company's $125 million revolver and $538.8 million (including the
proposed $65 million add-on) first-lien term loan B.  The '3'
recovery ratings remain unchanged, indicating S&P's expectation of
meaningful (50%-70%; lower end of the range) recovery in the event
of a payment default.

S&P also affirmed its 'CCC+' issue-level rating on the company's
second-lien term loan, which was originally $240 million but will
be reduced to $133 million after the proposed transaction.  The '6'
recovery rating is unchanged, reflecting S&P's expectation of
negligible (0%-10%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

CPP plans to use the proceeds from a $65 million add-on to its
existing first-lien term loan and $45 million of cash to pay down
approximately $107 million of debt on its second-lien term loan.
S&P expects the transaction to reduce the company's interest
expense by about $8 million per year.  The proposed refinancing
will lower CPP's debt and interest expense; however, the company's
2015 earnings will now likely be lower than in S&P's previous
forecast, although its expected credit ratios for 2015 are largely
unchanged (debt-to-EBITDA of 6.0x-6.5x).  "We had previously
expected that the company's revenues would increase by 2%-5% in
2015 and that its margins would improve during the year; however,
the restructuring of the company's Lourdes, France facility, the
impact of the weaker euro, and weaker non-commercial aerospace
demand has caused us to lower our forecast," said Standard & Poor's
credit analyst Christopher Denicolo.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that CPP's revenues
and earnings will decline modestly in 2015 from their 2014 levels,
but that they will begin to improve again in 2016 as the company
benefits from a strong commercial aerospace market and management's
cost-reduction efforts.  However, the decline in the company's debt
and interest expense from the proposed refinancing should modestly
improve its credit ratios in 2015, with its debt-to-EBITDA metric
falling below 6.5x.

S&P could lower its rating on the company if the commercial
aerospace market weakens, or if CPP's makes further debt-financed
acquisitions or dividends that increase its debt-to-EBITDA metric
above 7x.



[*] Mintz Levin's Bankruptcy Practice Recognized by Legal 500
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Legal 500 United States has recognized Mintz, Levin, Cohn,
Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. as a leading municipal bankruptcy
firm in the 2015 edition.  According to the guide, the Mintz Levin
team "has an excellent track record in Chapter 9 and Chapter 11
cases where it acts for bondholders, trustees and bond insurers."

For the third consecutive year, William W. Kannel, Section Head of
the Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Commercial Law Section, has been
named to The Legal 500 United States' "Leading Lawyers" list, the
highest ranking for individuals, for Finance – Municipal
Bankruptcy.  Mr. Kannel is described by clients and peers as
"invaluable and articulate."  The guide also highlighted Adrienne
K. Walker and Ian A. Hammel, Members of the Bankruptcy,
Restructuring & Commercial Law Section, Richard H. Moche and
Ann-Ellen Hornidge, Members of the Public Finance Section, and
Michael S. Gardener, a Member of the Litigation Section, as key
attorneys in the firm's nationally ranked municipal bankruptcy
group.

The Legal 500 is an independent guide that surveys and interviews
more than 250,000 corporate counsel globally each year.  The Legal
500 United States is the only guide to recommend firms on a
national basis.



[^] Large Companies With Insolvent Balance Sheet
------------------------------------------------
                                               Total
                                              Share-      Total
                                   Total    Holders'    Working
                                  Assets      Equity    Capital
  Company         Ticker            ($MM)       ($MM)      ($MM)
  -------         ------          ------    --------    -------
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  OU1 GR           111.9        (5.5)      (0.6)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ALSWF US         111.9        (5.5)      (0.6)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT CN           111.9        (5.5)      (0.6)
ACCRETIVE HEALTH  ACHI US          510.0       (85.6)     (17.7)
ADVANCED EMISSIO  OXQ1 GR          106.4       (46.1)     (15.3)
ADVANCED EMISSIO  ADES US          106.4       (46.1)     (15.3)
ADVENT SOFTWARE   ADVS US          424.8       (50.1)    (110.8)
ADVENT SOFTWARE   AXQ GR           424.8       (50.1)    (110.8)
AEROJET ROCKETDY  GCY GR         1,911.7      (126.4)     109.8
AEROJET ROCKETDY  GCY TH         1,911.7      (126.4)     109.8
AEROJET ROCKETDY  AJRD US        1,911.7      (126.4)     109.8
AIR CANADA        AC CN         11,581.0    (1,213.0)     (95.0)
AIR CANADA        ACDVF US      11,581.0    (1,213.0)     (95.0)
AIR CANADA        ADH2 GR       11,581.0    (1,213.0)     (95.0)
AIR CANADA        ACEUR EU      11,581.0    (1,213.0)     (95.0)
AIR CANADA        ADH2 TH       11,581.0    (1,213.0)     (95.0)
AK STEEL HLDG     AKS US         4,556.3      (392.9)     949.0
AK STEEL HLDG     AKS* MM        4,556.3      (392.9)     949.0
AK STEEL HLDG     AK2 TH         4,556.3      (392.9)     949.0
AK STEEL HLDG     AK2 GR         4,556.3      (392.9)     949.0
ALLIANCE HEALTHC  AIQ US           551.6       (88.9)      46.7
AMC NETWORKS-A    AMCX US        4,049.4       (89.4)     597.5
AMC NETWORKS-A    AMCX* MM       4,049.4       (89.4)     597.5
AMC NETWORKS-A    9AC GR         4,049.4       (89.4)     597.5
AMER RESTAUR-LP   ICTPU US          33.5        (4.0)      (6.2)
AMYLIN PHARMACEU  AMLN US        1,998.7       (42.4)     263.0
ANGIE'S LIST INC  8AL TH           178.8       (15.6)     (13.1)
ANGIE'S LIST INC  8AL GR           178.8       (15.6)     (13.1)
ANGIE'S LIST INC  ANGI US          178.8       (15.6)     (13.1)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPN US          317.1       (26.8)     (17.4)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AST GR           317.1       (26.8)     (17.4)
AUTOZONE INC      AZO US         7,950.0    (1,468.7)    (709.5)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 TH         7,950.0    (1,468.7)    (709.5)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOEUR EU      7,950.0    (1,468.7)    (709.5)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 GR         7,950.0    (1,468.7)    (709.5)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVID US          182.0      (344.7)    (165.7)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVD GR           182.0      (344.7)    (165.7)
AVINGER INC       AVGR US           23.1       (16.1)      13.3
BARRACUDA NETWOR  CUDA US          389.3       (39.1)      29.1
BARRACUDA NETWOR  7BM GR           389.3       (39.1)      29.1
BERRY PLASTICS G  BP0 GR         5,214.0       (73.0)     758.0
BERRY PLASTICS G  BERY US        5,214.0       (73.0)     758.0
BRINKER INTL      EAT US         1,437.3       (32.1)    (216.6)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ GR         1,437.3       (32.1)    (216.6)
BURLINGTON STORE  BURL* MM       2,683.1       (30.4)     161.9
BURLINGTON STORE  BURL US        2,683.1       (30.4)     161.9
BURLINGTON STORE  BUI GR         2,683.1       (30.4)     161.9
CABLEVISION SY-A  CVY TH         6,701.2    (5,022.6)      50.8
CABLEVISION SY-A  CVCEUR EU      6,701.2    (5,022.6)      50.8
CABLEVISION SY-A  CVC US         6,701.2    (5,022.6)      50.8
CABLEVISION SY-A  CVY GR         6,701.2    (5,022.6)      50.8
CABLEVISION-W/I   CVC-W US       6,701.2    (5,022.6)      50.8
CABLEVISION-W/I   8441293Q US    6,701.2    (5,022.6)      50.8
CAMBIUM LEARNING  ABCD US          154.9       (77.3)     (19.9)
CARBYLAN THERAPE  CBYL US            7.7        (9.4)      (6.7)
CASELLA WASTE     CWST US          654.4       (20.9)       4.9
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 GR           654.4       (20.9)       4.9
CEDAR FAIR LP     7CF GR         2,005.9       (21.2)     (74.4)
CEDAR FAIR LP     FUN US         2,005.9       (21.2)     (74.4)
CENTENNIAL COMM   CYCL US        1,480.9      (925.9)     (52.1)
CHOICE HOTELS     CHH US           661.1      (413.5)     175.4
CHOICE HOTELS     CZH GR           661.1      (413.5)     175.4
CINCINNATI BELL   CBB US         1,733.0      (599.6)      46.3
CINCINNATI BELL   CIB GR         1,733.0      (599.6)      46.3
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   C7C GR         6,179.8      (255.3)     410.7
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   CCO US         6,179.8      (255.3)     410.7
CLIFFS NATURAL R  CLF US         2,702.6    (1,782.1)     677.9
CLIFFS NATURAL R  CVA TH         2,702.6    (1,782.1)     677.9
CLIFFS NATURAL R  CVA GR         2,702.6    (1,782.1)     677.9
CLIFFS NATURAL R  CLF* MM        2,702.6    (1,782.1)     677.9
CLIFFS NATURAL R  CLF2EUR EU     2,702.6    (1,782.1)     677.9
COLLEGIUM PHARMA  COLL US            5.1       (12.2)      (5.9)
CONNECTURE INC    2U7 GR            96.0       (33.2)     (24.9)
CONNECTURE INC    CNXR US           96.0       (33.2)     (24.9)
CORINDUS VASCULA  CVRS US            0.0        (0.0)      (0.0)
CORIUM INTERNATI  CORI US           62.7        (0.4)      35.9
CORIUM INTERNATI  6CU GR            62.7        (0.4)      35.9
CYAN INC          CYNI US          112.1       (18.4)      56.9
CYAN INC          YCN GR           112.1       (18.4)      56.9
DELEK LOGISTICS   DKL US           332.6       (20.6)      11.8
DELEK LOGISTICS   D6L GR           332.6       (20.6)      11.8
DIRECTV           DTV US        24,301.0    (4,280.0)     482.0
DIRECTV           DTV CI        24,301.0    (4,280.0)     482.0
DIRECTV           DTVEUR EU     24,301.0    (4,280.0)     482.0
DIRECTV           DIG1 GR       24,301.0    (4,280.0)     482.0
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZ US           637.0    (1,213.6)     170.7
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV TH           637.0    (1,213.6)     170.7
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV GR           637.0    (1,213.6)     170.7
DUN & BRADSTREET  DB5 GR         2,027.7    (1,201.3)    (276.7)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DB5 TH         2,027.7    (1,201.3)    (276.7)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB US         2,027.7    (1,201.3)    (276.7)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB1EUR EU     2,027.7    (1,201.3)    (276.7)
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKN US        3,360.1       (84.9)     278.7
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB GR         3,360.1       (84.9)     278.7
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB TH         3,360.1       (84.9)     278.7
DURATA THERAPEUT  DRTX US           82.1       (16.1)      11.7
DURATA THERAPEUT  DRTXEUR EU        82.1       (16.1)      11.7
DURATA THERAPEUT  DTA GR            82.1       (16.1)      11.7
EDGEN GROUP INC   EDG US           883.8        (0.8)     409.2
ENTELLUS MEDICAL  ENTL US           14.0        (8.0)       4.8
ENTELLUS MEDICAL  29E GR            14.0        (8.0)       4.8
EOS PETRO INC     EOPT US            1.2       (28.0)     (29.1)
EXELIXIS INC      EXEL US          282.9      (146.8)      66.4
EXELIXIS INC      EX9 GR           282.9      (146.8)      66.4
EXELIXIS INC      EXELEUR EU       282.9      (146.8)      66.4
FAIRWAY GROUP HO  FWM US           359.1       (22.6)      17.6
FAIRWAY GROUP HO  FGWA GR          359.1       (22.6)      17.6
FENIX PARTS INC   9FP GR             0.8        (1.1)      (1.1)
FENIX PARTS INC   FENX US            0.8        (1.1)      (1.1)
FERRELLGAS-LP     FGP US         1,747.0      (128.0)      (6.4)
FERRELLGAS-LP     FEG GR         1,747.0      (128.0)      (6.4)
FREESCALE SEMICO  FSL US         3,096.0    (3,454.0)   1,174.0
FREESCALE SEMICO  FSLEUR EU      3,096.0    (3,454.0)   1,174.0
FREESCALE SEMICO  1FS GR         3,096.0    (3,454.0)   1,174.0
FREESCALE SEMICO  1FS TH         3,096.0    (3,454.0)   1,174.0
GAMING AND LEISU  GLPI US        2,552.5      (125.5)       1.1
GAMING AND LEISU  2GL GR         2,552.5      (125.5)       1.1
GARDA WRLD -CL A  GW CN          1,482.9      (332.3)      47.7
GARTNER INC       GGRA GR        1,789.4      (139.5)    (420.1)
GARTNER INC       IT US          1,789.4      (139.5)    (420.1)
GENESIS HEALTHCA  SH11 GR        6,031.4      (205.5)     209.3
GENESIS HEALTHCA  GEN US         6,031.4      (205.5)     209.3
GENTIVA HEALTH    GHT GR         1,225.2      (285.2)     130.0
GENTIVA HEALTH    GTIV US        1,225.2      (285.2)     130.0
GLG PARTNERS INC  GLG US           400.0      (285.6)     156.9
GLG PARTNERS-UTS  GLG/U US         400.0      (285.6)     156.9
GOLD RESERVE INC  GRZ CN            17.9       (24.6)     (35.0)
GOLD RESERVE INC  GDRZF US          17.9       (24.6)     (35.0)
GOLD RESERVE INC  GOD GR            17.9       (24.6)     (35.0)
GRAHAM PACKAGING  GRM US         2,947.5      (520.8)     298.5
GYMBOREE CORP/TH  GYMB US        1,206.6      (352.8)      30.7
HCA HOLDINGS INC  HCA US        31,288.0    (6,222.0)   1,958.0
HCA HOLDINGS INC  2BH TH        31,288.0    (6,222.0)   1,958.0
HCA HOLDINGS INC  2BH GR        31,288.0    (6,222.0)   1,958.0
HD SUPPLY HOLDIN  5HD GR         6,321.0      (498.0)   1,400.0
HD SUPPLY HOLDIN  HDS US         6,321.0      (498.0)   1,400.0
HERBALIFE LTD     HLFEUR EU      2,388.9      (301.2)     259.3
HERBALIFE LTD     HOO GR         2,388.9      (301.2)     259.3
HERBALIFE LTD     HLF US         2,388.9      (301.2)     259.3
HOVNANIAN ENT-B   HOVVB US       2,517.0      (146.3)   1,516.6
HOVNANIAN-A-WI    HOV-W US       2,517.0      (146.3)   1,516.6
HUGHES TELEMATIC  HUTCU US         110.2      (101.6)    (113.8)
IHEARTMEDIA INC   IHRT US       13,581.9   (10,153.7)     683.9
INCYTE CORP       ICY GR           862.6       (41.4)     466.6
INCYTE CORP       ICY TH           862.6       (41.4)     466.6
INCYTE CORP       INCYEUR EU       862.6       (41.4)     466.6
INCYTE CORP       INCY US          862.6       (41.4)     466.6
INFOR US INC      LWSN US        6,778.1      (460.0)    (305.9)
INVENTIV HEALTH   VTIV US        2,154.4      (613.8)      84.5
IPCS INC          IPCS US          559.2       (33.0)      72.1
ISTA PHARMACEUTI  ISTA US          124.7       (64.8)       2.2
JUST ENERGY GROU  JE CN          1,297.2      (638.8)     (87.0)
JUST ENERGY GROU  JE US          1,297.2      (638.8)     (87.0)
JUST ENERGY GROU  1JE GR         1,297.2      (638.8)     (87.0)
KEMPHARM INC      KMPH US           14.1       (26.1)       6.3
L BRANDS INC      LB* MM         6,638.0      (606.0)     927.0
L BRANDS INC      LB US          6,638.0      (606.0)     927.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD QT         6,638.0      (606.0)     927.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD TH         6,638.0      (606.0)     927.0
L BRANDS INC      LBEUR EU       6,638.0      (606.0)     927.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD GR         6,638.0      (606.0)     927.0
LEAP WIRELESS     LEAP US        4,662.9      (125.1)     346.9
LEAP WIRELESS     LWI GR         4,662.9      (125.1)     346.9
LEAP WIRELESS     LWI TH         4,662.9      (125.1)     346.9
LEE ENTERPRISES   LEE US           779.6      (165.1)     (20.2)
LENNOX INTL INC   LII US         1,879.5       (16.2)     369.8
LENNOX INTL INC   LXI GR         1,879.5       (16.2)     369.8
LORILLARD INC     LO US          4,154.0    (2,134.0)   1,135.0
LORILLARD INC     LLV TH         4,154.0    (2,134.0)   1,135.0
LORILLARD INC     LLV GR         4,154.0    (2,134.0)   1,135.0
MAJESCOR RESOURC  MJXEUR EU          0.1        (2.9)      (2.9)
MANNKIND CORP     MNKDEUR EU       360.0       (97.0)    (222.5)
MANNKIND CORP     NNF1 TH          360.0       (97.0)    (222.5)
MANNKIND CORP     NNF1 GR          360.0       (97.0)    (222.5)
MANNKIND CORP     MNKD US          360.0       (97.0)    (222.5)
MARRIOTT INTL-A   MAR US         6,803.0    (2,537.0)  (1,202.0)
MARRIOTT INTL-A   MAQ TH         6,803.0    (2,537.0)  (1,202.0)
MARRIOTT INTL-A   MAQ GR         6,803.0    (2,537.0)  (1,202.0)
MDC COMM-W/I      MDZ/W CN       1,640.1      (196.6)    (284.0)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDZ/A CN       1,640.1      (196.6)    (284.0)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDCA US        1,640.1      (196.6)    (284.0)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MD7A GR        1,640.1      (196.6)    (284.0)
MDC PARTNERS-EXC  MDZ/N CN       1,640.1      (196.6)    (284.0)
MERITOR INC       AID1 GR        2,317.0      (570.0)     268.0
MERITOR INC       MTOR US        2,317.0      (570.0)     268.0
MERRIMACK PHARMA  MACK US          127.0      (128.8)      (4.4)
MERRIMACK PHARMA  MP6 GR           127.0      (128.8)      (4.4)
MICHAELS COS INC  MIK US         1,922.7    (2,031.3)     471.7
MICHAELS COS INC  MIM GR         1,922.7    (2,031.3)     471.7
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGI US         4,578.9      (261.8)     (45.4)
MOODY'S CORP      DUT GR         4,976.0      (146.2)   1,901.1
MOODY'S CORP      MCO US         4,976.0      (146.2)   1,901.1
MOODY'S CORP      DUT QT         4,976.0      (146.2)   1,901.1
MOODY'S CORP      MCOEUR EU      4,976.0      (146.2)   1,901.1
MOODY'S CORP      DUT TH         4,976.0      (146.2)   1,901.1
MORGANS HOTEL GR  M1U GR           532.4      (246.2)      31.0
MORGANS HOTEL GR  MHGC US          532.4      (246.2)      31.0
MOXIAN CHINA INC  MOXC US            9.5        (6.4)     (13.7)
MPG OFFICE TRUST  1052394D US    1,280.0      (437.3)       -
NATIONAL CINEMED  XWM GR           985.6      (219.8)      63.5
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMI US          985.6      (219.8)      63.5
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR TH         6,925.0    (4,744.0)     770.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR GR         6,925.0    (4,744.0)     770.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAV US         6,925.0    (4,744.0)     770.0
NEFF CORP-CL A    NEFF US          634.4      (202.7)     (12.8)
NEW ENG RLTY-LP   NEN US           175.7       (29.1)       -
NORTHWEST BIO     NBYA GR           49.4       (70.7)     (86.3)
NORTHWEST BIO     NWBO US           49.4       (70.7)     (86.3)
OCATA THERAPEUTI  OCAT US            4.9        (2.1)      (0.3)
OCATA THERAPEUTI  T2N1 GR            4.9        (2.1)      (0.3)
OMTHERA PHARMACE  OMTH US           18.3        (8.5)     (12.0)
PALM INC          PALM US        1,007.2        (6.2)     141.7
PBF LOGISTICS LP  PBFX US          402.3      (112.0)      30.1
PBF LOGISTICS LP  11P GR           402.3      (112.0)      30.1
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM FP         33,255.0   (12,246.0)    (705.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1CHF EU     33,255.0   (12,246.0)    (705.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 QT        33,255.0   (12,246.0)    (705.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 TH        33,255.0   (12,246.0)    (705.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI SW        33,255.0   (12,246.0)    (705.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1EUR EU     33,255.0   (12,246.0)    (705.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM US         33,255.0   (12,246.0)    (705.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GR        33,255.0   (12,246.0)    (705.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1 TE        33,255.0   (12,246.0)    (705.0)
PLAYBOY ENTERP-A  PLA/A US         165.8       (54.4)     (16.9)
PLAYBOY ENTERP-B  PLA US           165.8       (54.4)     (16.9)
PLY GEM HOLDINGS  PGEM US        1,231.9      (150.1)     241.4
PLY GEM HOLDINGS  PG6 GR         1,231.9      (150.1)     241.4
POLYMER GROUP IN  POLGA US       1,901.8       (12.6)     315.2
POLYMER GROUP-B   POLGB US       1,901.8       (12.6)     315.2
PROTALEX INC      PRTX US            0.6       (11.5)       0.0
PROTECTION ONE    PONE US          562.9       (61.8)      (7.6)
PUREBASE CORP     PUBC US            0.3        (1.0)      (0.3)
QUALITY DISTRIBU  QDZ GR           417.9       (26.9)     110.6
QUALITY DISTRIBU  QLTY US          417.9       (26.9)     110.6
QUINTILES TRANSN  QTS GR         3,236.7      (612.3)     778.1
QUINTILES TRANSN  Q US           3,236.7      (612.3)     778.1
RAYONIER ADV      RYAM US        1,281.8       (52.6)     179.2
RAYONIER ADV      RYQ GR         1,281.8       (52.6)     179.2
RE/MAX HOLDINGS   RMAX US          362.5        (0.2)      41.0
RE/MAX HOLDINGS   2RM GR           362.5        (0.2)      41.0
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RETA GR        2,484.4      (911.5)    (118.6)
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RGC US         2,484.4      (911.5)    (118.6)
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RGC* MM        2,484.4      (911.5)    (118.6)
RENAISSANCE LEA   RLRN US           57.0       (28.2)     (31.4)
RENTPATH INC      PRM US           208.0       (91.7)       3.6
REVLON INC-A      REV US         1,873.7      (658.9)     315.1
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 GR        1,873.7      (658.9)     315.1
ROUNDY'S INC      RNDY US        1,112.5       (87.0)      80.0
RURAL/METRO CORP  RURL US          303.7       (92.1)      72.4
RYERSON HOLDING   7RY GR         1,903.2      (135.0)     706.3
RYERSON HOLDING   7RY TH         1,903.2      (135.0)     706.3
RYERSON HOLDING   RYI US         1,903.2      (135.0)     706.3
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  S7V GR         2,134.9      (261.0)     766.9
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  SBH US         2,134.9      (261.0)     766.9
SBA COMM CORP-A   SBJ GR         7,527.3    (1,036.8)      38.5
SBA COMM CORP-A   SBACEUR EU     7,527.3    (1,036.8)      38.5
SBA COMM CORP-A   SBJ TH         7,527.3    (1,036.8)      38.5
SBA COMM CORP-A   SBAC US        7,527.3    (1,036.8)      38.5
SCIENTIFIC GAM-A  TJW GR         9,703.4      (189.4)     686.9
SCIENTIFIC GAM-A  SGMS US        9,703.4      (189.4)     686.9
SEARS HOLDINGS    SEE GR        13,290.0    (1,182.0)      24.0
SEARS HOLDINGS    SHLD US       13,290.0    (1,182.0)      24.0
SEARS HOLDINGS    SEE TH        13,290.0    (1,182.0)      24.0
SEQUENOM INC      QNMA QT          145.5       (15.1)      84.4
SEQUENOM INC      SQNM US          145.5       (15.1)      84.4
SILVER SPRING NE  9SI GR           528.2       (94.3)     (10.2)
SILVER SPRING NE  9SI TH           528.2       (94.3)     (10.2)
SILVER SPRING NE  SSNI US          528.2       (94.3)     (10.2)
SIRIUS XM CANADA  SIICF US         298.2      (128.5)    (173.7)
SIRIUS XM CANADA  XSR CN           298.2      (128.5)    (173.7)
SONIC CORP        SO4 GR           625.8        (0.3)      13.7
SONIC CORP        SONCEUR EU       625.8        (0.3)      13.7
SONIC CORP        SONC US          625.8        (0.3)      13.7
SPORTSMAN'S WARE  SPWH US          305.8       (32.8)      77.8
SPORTSMAN'S WARE  06S GR           305.8       (32.8)      77.8
STINGRAY - SUB V  RAY/A CN         128.2       (17.8)     (41.0)
STINGRAY DIG-VSV  RAY/B CN         128.2       (17.8)     (41.0)
SUPERVALU INC     SVU US         4,485.0      (636.0)     167.0
SUPERVALU INC     SJ1 GR         4,485.0      (636.0)     167.0
SUPERVALU INC     SJ1 TH         4,485.0      (636.0)     167.0
SYNERGY PHARMACE  S90 GR           194.8       (24.7)     163.1
SYNERGY PHARMACE  SGYPEUR EU       194.8       (24.7)     163.1
SYNERGY PHARMACE  SGYP US          194.8       (24.7)     163.1
THERAVANCE        HVE GR           488.7      (260.1)     251.4
THERAVANCE        THRX US          488.7      (260.1)     251.4
THRESHOLD PHARMA  THLD US           88.0       (19.9)      53.1
THRESHOLD PHARMA  NZW1 GR           88.0       (19.9)      53.1
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG US         7,226.2    (1,326.2)     853.8
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D GR         7,226.2    (1,326.2)     853.8
TRINET GROUP INC  TNETEUR EU     1,620.2       (15.1)      15.2
TRINET GROUP INC  TNET US        1,620.2       (15.1)      15.2
TRINET GROUP INC  TN3 GR         1,620.2       (15.1)      15.2
TRINET GROUP INC  TN3 TH         1,620.2       (15.1)      15.2
UNISYS CORP       UISCHF EU      2,131.5    (1,421.3)     242.8
UNISYS CORP       UISEUR EU      2,131.5    (1,421.3)     242.8
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GR        2,131.5    (1,421.3)     242.8
UNISYS CORP       USY1 TH        2,131.5    (1,421.3)     242.8
UNISYS CORP       UIS1 SW        2,131.5    (1,421.3)     242.8
UNISYS CORP       UIS US         2,131.5    (1,421.3)     242.8
VENOCO INC        VQ US            596.0       (31.1)      52.2
VERISIGN INC      VRS GR         2,607.7      (947.9)      17.8
VERISIGN INC      VRS TH         2,607.7      (947.9)      17.8
VERISIGN INC      VRSN US        2,607.7      (947.9)      17.8
VERIZON TELEMATI  HUTC US          110.2      (101.6)    (113.8)
VERSEON CORP      VSN LN             -           -          -
VIRGIN MOBILE-A   VM US            307.4      (244.2)    (138.3)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 TH         1,446.4    (1,385.2)    (260.9)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTWEUR EU      1,446.4    (1,385.2)    (260.9)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 GR         1,446.4    (1,385.2)    (260.9)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTW US         1,446.4    (1,385.2)    (260.9)
WEST CORP         WSTC US        3,546.2      (647.7)     247.3
WEST CORP         WT2 GR         3,546.2      (647.7)     247.3
WESTERN REFINING  WNRL US          434.0       (27.4)      71.5
WESTERN REFINING  WR2 GR           434.0       (27.4)      71.5
WESTMORELAND COA  WLB US         1,829.7      (388.7)      59.0
WESTMORELAND COA  WME GR         1,829.7      (388.7)      59.0
WINGSTOP INC      WING US          114.1       (54.0)      (4.6)
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYNN US        9,151.7      (147.2)   1,135.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYNN SW        9,151.7      (147.2)   1,135.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYNNCHF EU     9,151.7      (147.2)   1,135.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYNN* MM       9,151.7      (147.2)   1,135.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYR TH         9,151.7      (147.2)   1,135.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYR GR         9,151.7      (147.2)   1,135.3
XERIUM TECHNOLOG  TXRN GR          561.0      (102.9)      81.5
XERIUM TECHNOLOG  XRM US           561.0      (102.9)      81.5
XOMA CORP         XOMA GR           78.1       (13.4)      46.2
XOMA CORP         XOMA TH           78.1       (13.4)      46.2
XOMA CORP         XOMA US           78.1       (13.4)      46.2
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 GR        1,966.2      (479.7)     148.7
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 TH        1,966.2      (479.7)     148.7
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCW US        1,966.2      (479.7)     148.7


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2015.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***