TCR_Public/090621.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Sunday, June 21, 2009, Vol. 13, No. 170

                            Headlines


ALADDIN SYNTHETIC: Moody's Withdraws 'Caa3' Ratings on A-3 Notes
ALADDIN SYNTHETIC: S&P Withdraws 'CCC-' Rating on Series A-3 Notes
AMRESCO RES: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 11 Securities
ARES VII: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
ARES VR: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes

ARMSTRONG LOAN: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Notes
ASSET BACKED: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 38 Securities
ASSET BACKED: Moody's Takes Rating Actions on Various Securities
AVALON CAPITAL: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
AVENUE CLO: Moody's Junks Ratings on Class B-1L & B-1F Notes

AVENUE CLO: Moody's Junks Rating on Class C $13,000,000 Notes
BABSON CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various 2008-I Notes
BANC OF AMERICA: Fitch Affirms Ratings on 2002-2 Certificates
BANC OF AMERICA: S&P Corrects Rating on Class 3-A-4 Certificates
BAYVIEW FINANCIAL: Moody's Confirms Ratings on 30 Tranches

BEAR STEARNS: Fitch Puts Ratings on 2007-PWR18 Notes on Neg. Watch
BEAR STEARNS: Moody's Cuts Ratings on Six 2007-HE7 Securities
BLUE MOUNTAIN: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
BRENTWOOD CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
BUSINESS LOAN: Fitch Takes Rating Actions on Four Transactions

CABCO TRUST: Moody's Upgrades Ratings on Trust Certs. to 'Ba1'
CANNINGTON FUNDING: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Notes
CAPMARK INVESTMENTS: Fitch Withdraws CDO Asset Manager Rating
CDX.NA.HY.8 TRUST: Moody's Junks Rating on $1.3 Bil. Certs.
CDX.NA.HY.8 TRUST: Moody's Junks Ratings on $350 Mil. Certs.

CDX.NA.HY.8 TRUST: Moody's Junks Ratings on $500 Mil. Certs.
CDX.NA.HY.9 TRUST: Moody's Cuts Rating on $700MM Certs. to 'Caa3'
CDX.NA.HY.9 TRUST: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $625MM Certs. to 'Caa3'
CENT CDO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
CHASE MORTGAGE: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Nine 2006-S1 Notes

CHATHAM LIGHT: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
CHL MORTGAGE: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 196 Tranches
CIFG ASSURANCE: S&P Junks Ratings on Eight Medium-Term Notes
CLYDESDALE CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
COMSTOCK FUNDING: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes

COSTA BELLA: Fitch Downgrades Ratings on Eight Classes of Notes
CREDIT AND REPACKAGED: S&P Affirms 'B-' Rating on 2006-14 Notes
CREDIT SUISSE: Moody's Affirms Ratings on Nine 2005-C1 Certs.
CREDIT SUISSE: Moody's Reviews Ratings on 2005-C2 Certificates
CSMC MORTGAGE-BACKED: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 37 Tranches

DENALI CAPITAL: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Notes
DOW JONES: Moody's Junks Ratings on $325 Mil. Certs. From 'B1'
DOW JONES: Moody's Junks Rating on $400 Mil. Certs. From 'B3'
DOW JONES: Moody's Junks Ratings on $550 Mil. Certs. From 'B3'
DOW JONES: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $725 Mil. Certs. to 'Caa3'

DOW JONES: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $1.25 Bil. Certs. to 'Ca'
DOW JONES: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $2.25 Bil. Certs. to 'Caa3'
DRYDEN VI: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various 2004 Notes
FIRST HORIZON: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 71 Tranches
FIRST UNION: Moody's Reviews Ratings on 2001-C1 Certificates

FIRST UNION-LEHMAN: Moody's Affirms Ratings on 10 1998-C2 Certs.
FLAGSHIP CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
FRANKLIN CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
GALAXY IV: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
GENERAL AMERICAN: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Certificates

GENESIS CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 2007-1 Notes
HALCYON LOAN: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
HEWETT ISLAND: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
HUDSON CANYON: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Two Classes of Notes
IMC HOME: Moody's Cuts Underlying Rating on 1998-7 Notes to 'Ba1'

IMC HOME: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 1998-7 Security to 'Ba1'
IMPAC SECURED: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Class 1-A2-A Certs.
INDYMAC HOME: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 2007-2 Notes
GENESIS CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various 2007-2 Notes
JFK MEDICAL: Moody's Withdraws 'Ba3' Rating on Outstanding Bonds

JP MORGAN: Moody's Affirms Ratings on 14 2005-CIBC11 Notes
JP MORGAN: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 133 From Eight RMBS Deals
KATONAH IX: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
LATITUDE CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
LB-UBS COMMERCIAL: Fitch Junks Ratings on Three 2002-C4 Notes

LB-UBS COMMERCIAL: Moody's Affirms Ratings on 15 Pooled Classes
LB-UBS COMMERCIAL: Moody's Affirms Ratings on 2003-C3 Certs.
LEHMAN BROTHERS: Moody's Reviews Ratings on Series 2004-LLF Certs.
MARATHON CLO: Moody's Keeps Junk Rating on Class E Notes
MARATHON CLO: Moody's Cuts Rating on Class D Notes to Ca

MERRILL LYNCH: S&P Downgrades Ratings on Five 1999-C1 Certs.
MUHLENBERG REGIONAL: Moody's Withdraws 'Ba3' Rating on Bonds
MUZINICH CBO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
NEW ORLEANS: S&P Raises Underlying Rating on Tax Bonds From 'BB'
NOB HILL: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes

PACIFICA CDO: Moody's Junks Ratings on Class C-1 & C-2 Notes
PACIFICA CDO: Moody's Junks Ratings on Three Classes of Notes
PARCS-R MASTER: S&P Downgrades Ratings on Three 2007-2 Notes
PPLUS TRUST: S&P Puts 'BB' Ratings on CreditWatch Negative
PRO RATA: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Three Classes of Notes

RFMSII HOME: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 17 Tranches
SKYTOP CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Two Classes of Notes
SOUTHPORT CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
SPYGLASS TRUST: Moody's Cuts Ratings on Principal Units to 'Ba1'
STRUCTURED ASSET: S&P Puts 'BB' Rating on CreditWatch Negative

TERWIN MORTGAGE: Moody's Confirms Ratings on Class II-A-1a Tranche
TEXTRON FINANCIAL: Moody's Takes Rating Actions on 2007-A Notes
VERITAS CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Notes
WACHOVIA BANK: Fitch Puts Ratings on 2005-C22 Notes on Neg. Watch
WACHOVIA BANK: Moody's Reviews Ratings on Nine 2007-ESH Certs.

ZOHAR CDO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various 2003-1 Notes
ZOHAR II: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various 2005-1 Notes
ZOHAR III: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes

* Fitch Takes Various Rating Actions on 422 Bonds in 208 RMBS NIMs
* S&P Cuts Ratings on 60 Classes of Certs. from 14 Alt-A Deals
* S&P Downgrades Ratings on 17 Classes From Five RMBS Transactions
* S&P Downgrades Ratings on 28 Classes of Notes to 'D'
* S&P Downgrades Ratings on 81 Tranches From 31 CDO Transactions

* S&P Downgrades Ratings on 103 Classes From Seven RMBS Deals
* S&P Downgrades Ratings on 218 Classes From Nine Prime Jumbo RMBS
* S&P Downgrades Ratings on Four Tranches From Two CDO Deals
* S&P Downgrades Ratings on Littlefield, Texas' Debt to 'B'
* S&P Puts Ratings on 52 Classes on CreditWatch Negative



                            *********

ALADDIN SYNTHETIC: Moody's Withdraws 'Caa3' Ratings on A-3 Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has withdrawn its
rating on the Series A-3 of notes issued by Aladdin Synthetic CDO
II SPC, a collateralized debt obligation transaction referencing a
managed portfolio of corporate entities.

Class Description: US$250,000,000 Series A-3 Floating Rate Notes
Due 2014

  -- Current Rating: WR

  -- Prior Rating Action: downgrade to Caa3 from Ba1 under review
     for downgrade, on February 5, 2009.

The issuer has requested the withdrawal of the rating for business
reasons.


ALADDIN SYNTHETIC: S&P Withdraws 'CCC-' Rating on Series A-3 Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services withdrew its rating on the
notes issued by Aladdin Synthetic CDO II SPC's series A-3, a
synthetic corporate investment-grade collateralized debt
obligation transaction.

S&P withdrew the rating at the issuer's request.

                         Rating Withdrawn

                   Aladdin Synthetic CDO II SPC
                            Series A-3

                                   Rating
                                   ------
                   Class       To          From
                   -----       --          ----
                   Notes       NR          CCC-

                        NR - Not rated.


AMRESCO RES: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 11 Securities
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the rating of eleven
securities from three transactions issued by AMRESCO.  These
actions are part of an ongoing review of subprime RMBS
transactions.

The rating actions are the result of an analysis of credit
enhancement relative to updated collateral loss projections.  The
revised loss projections generally result from deterioration in
collateral performance in recent months.  Additionally, most
affected transactions have, at some point, passed performance
triggers and released portions of credit enhancement.

Moody's approach to analyzing seasoned subprime pools (i.e. prior
to 2H 2005) takes into account the annualized loss rate from last
12 months and the projected loss rate over next 12 months, and
then translates these measures into lifetime losses based on a
deal's expected remaining life.  Recent Losses are calculated by
assessing cumulative losses incurred over the past 12-months as a
percentage of the average pool factor in the last year.  For
Pipeline Losses, Moody's uses an annualized roll rate of 15%, 30%,
65% and 90% for loans that are delinquent 60-days, 90+ days, are
in foreclosure, and REO respectively.  Moody's then applies deal-
specific severity assumptions, in this case ranging from 60% to
80%.  The results of these two calculations -- Recent Losses and
Pipeline Losses -- are weighted to arrive at the lifetime
cumulative loss projection.

The complete rating actions:

AMRESCO Res. Sec. Corp. Mtg. Loan Trust 97-3

  -- M-1F, Downgraded to A1; previously on 5/5/1986 Assigned Aa2

  -- B-1F, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 3/16/2005 Downgraded to
     Caa3

AMRESCO Res. Sec. Corp. Mtge. Loan Tr. 1998-3

  -- A-5, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 9/30/1998 Assigned Aaa

  -- A-6, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 9/30/1998 Assigned Aaa

  -- B-1F, Downgraded to C; previously on 10/5/2006 Downgraded to
     Caa1

AMRESCO Res. Sec. Corp. Mtge. Loan Trust 98-2

  -- A-5, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 6/11/1998 Assigned Aaa

  -- A-6, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 6/11/1998 Assigned Aaa

  -- M-1A, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 6/11/1998 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- M-1F, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 6/11/1998 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- M-2F, Downgraded to B2; previously on 6/11/1998 Assigned A2

  -- B-1F, Downgraded to B2; previously on 8/25/2004 Downgraded to
     Ba3


ARES VII: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Ares VII CLO Ltd:

  -- US$150,000,000 Class A-1a Senior Secured Floating Rate
     Notes, Due 2015, Downgraded to A2; previously on March 20,
     2009 Aaa Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$171,000,000 Class A-1b Senior Secured Floating Rate
     Notes, Due 2015, Downgraded to A2; previously on March 20,
     2009 Aaa Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$36,000,000 Class B Senior Secured Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes, Due 2015, Downgraded to B1; previously on March
     20, 2009 Ba1 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class A Overcollateralization Ratio Test, the Class B
Overcollateralization Ratio Test, and the Class C
Overcollateralization Ratio Test.  The weighted average rating
factor has steadily increased over the last year and it is
currently at 3414 versus a test level of 2530 as of the last
trustee report, dated April 30, 2009.  Based on the same report,
defaulted securities total about $19.5 million, accounting for
roughly 5.25% of the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1
or lower by Moody's or CCC+ or lower by S&P make up approximately
22% of the underlying portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments
on the Class B Notes are presently being deferred as a result of
the failure of the Class A Overcollateralization Test.

Ares VII CLO Ltd., issued in May of 2003, is a collateralized loan
obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


ARES VR: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
ratings on these notes issued by Ares VR CLO:

  -- US$35,000,000 Class A-1 Revolving Floating Rate Notes Due
     2018, Downgraded to A1; previously on March 23, 2006 Assigned
     Aaa;

  -- US$100,000,000 Class A-2 Delayed Drawdown Floating Rate
     Notes Due 2018, Downgraded to A1; previously on March 23,
     2006 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$333,700,000 Class A-3 Floating Rate Notes Due 2018,
     Downgraded to A1; previously on March 23, 2006 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$22,100,000 Class B Floating Rate Notes Due 2018,
     Downgraded to Baa2; previously on March 4, 2009 Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$56,200,000 Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due
     2018, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on March 17, 2009
     Downgraded to B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$10,000,000 Combination Securities Due 2018, Downgraded
     to Caa3; previously on March 4, 2009 Baa2 Placed Under Review
     for Possible Downgrade.

Moody's Investors Service also announced that it has confirmed its
ratings on these notes issued by Ares VR CLO:

  -- US$23,400,000 Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due
     2018, Confirmed at Ba1; previously on March 17, 2009
     Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research (see Moody's Special Comment
titled "Strong Loan Issuance in Recent Years Signals Low Recovery
Prospects for Loans and Bonds of Defaulted U.S. Corporate
Issuers," dated June 2008).

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class C Par Value Test and the Class D Par Value Test.  The
weighted average rating factor has steadily increased over the
last year, and it is currently 3106 versus a test level of 2779 as
of the latest trustee report, dated May 15, 2009.  Based on the
same report, securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately
16% of the underlying portfolio.

Ares VR CLO, issued in March of 2006, is a collateralized loan
obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


ARMSTRONG LOAN: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Armstrong Loan Funding Ltd.:

  -- US$133,320,000 Class B Floating Rate Senior Secured Notes
     Due 2016, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$30,300,000 Class C Floating Rate Senior Secured Notes
     Due 2016, Downgraded to A3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$18,180,000 Class F Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Deferrable Interest Notes Due 2016, Downgraded to Ca;
     previously on March 20, 2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

In addition, Moody's has confirmed the ratings on these notes:

  -- US$36,360,000 Class D Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Deferrable Interest Notes Due 2016, Confirmed at Ba3;
     previously on March 20, 2009 Downgraded to Ba3 and Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$18,180,000 Class E Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Deferrable Interest Notes Due 2016, Confirmed at B3;
     previously on March 20, 2009 Downgraded to B3 and Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
overcollateralization tests.  The weighted average rating factor
has steadily increased over the last year and it is currently at
3,312 versus a test level of 2,924 as of the last trustee report,
dated April 21, 2009.  Based on the same report, defaulted
securities total about $15 million, accounting for roughly 2.6% of
the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1 or lower make up
approximately 25.8% of the underlying portfolio.  Additionally,
interest payments on the Class D Notes, Class E Notes, and Class F
Notes are presently being deferred as a result of the failure of
the Class C Overcollateralization Test.

Moody's also observes that the transaction is exposed to a number
of mezzanine and junior CLO tranches in the underlying portfolio.
The majority of these CLO tranches are currently assigned
speculative-grade ratings and carry depressed market valuations
that may herald poor recovery prospects in the event of default.

Armstrong Loan Funding Ltd., issued on March 19, 2008, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


ASSET BACKED: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 38 Securities
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the rating of 38
securities from 10 transactions issued by Asset Backed Funding
Corporation.  These actions are part of an ongoing review of
subprime RMBS transactions.

The rating actions are the result of an analysis of credit
enhancement relative to updated collateral loss projections. The
revised loss projections generally result from deterioration in
collateral performance in recent months.  Additionally, most
affected transactions have, at some point, passed performance
triggers and released portions of credit enhancement.

Moody's approach to analyzing seasoned subprime pools (i.e. prior
to 2H 2005) takes into account the annualized loss rate from last
12 months and the projected loss rate over next 12 months, and
then translates these measures into lifetime losses based on a
deal's expected remaining life.  Recent Losses are calculated by
assessing cumulative losses incurred over the past 12-months as a
percentage of the average pool factor in the last year.  For
Pipeline Losses, Moody's uses an annualized roll rate of 15%, 30%,
65% and 90% for loans that are delinquent 60-days, 90+ days, are
in foreclosure, and REO respectively.  Moody's then applies deal-
specific severity assumptions, in this case ranging from 55% to
80%.  The results of these two calculations -- Recent Losses and
Pipeline Losses -- are weighted to arrive at the lifetime
cumulative loss projection.

The complete rating actions:

ABFC 2001-AQ1 Trust

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/30/2001 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- Cl. B, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 8/4/2005 Downgraded to
     Caa2

ABFC 2002-NC1 Trust

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to B2; previously on 5/1/2009 Downgraded
     to Ba3

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to C; previously on 5/1/2009 Downgraded
     to Ca

ABFC 2002-OPT1 Trust

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to A3; previously on 9/23/2005 Upgraded
     to Aaa

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 9/23/2005 Upgraded
     to Aaa

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to B1; previously on 9/23/2005 Upgraded
     to Aa3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 10/15/2002 Assigned
     Baa1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to C; previously on 10/15/2002 Assigned
     Baa2

ABFC 2002-WF1 Trust

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to A2; previously on 4/1/2002 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 4/1/2002 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 4/1/2002 Assigned
     Baa2

ABFC 2002-WF2 Trust

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to A1; previously on 10/8/2002 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 10/8/2002 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 10/8/2002 Assigned
     Baa2

ABFC 2003-AHL1 Trust

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 5/28/2003 Assigned
     Baa2

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 1/22/2008 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

ABFC 2003-WMC1 Trust

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 11/16/2006 Upgraded
     to Aaa

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to A2; previously on 2/13/2008 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 2/13/2008 A1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 2/13/2008 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 2/13/2008 A3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

ABFC 2004-AHL1 Trust

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 3/19/2007 Upgraded
     to Aaa

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2007 Upgraded
     to Aa2

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 5/20/2004 Assigned
     A3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 5/20/2004 Assigned
     Baa1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 5/20/2004 Assigned
     Baa2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to B1; previously on 5/20/2004 Assigned
     Baa3

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to B1; previously on 5/20/2004 Assigned
     Ba1

ABFC 2004-HE1

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 9/7/2004 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 9/7/2004 Assigned
     A3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 9/7/2004 Assigned
     Baa1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 9/7/2004 Assigned
     Baa2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to B3; previously on 9/7/2004 Assigned
     Baa3

ABFC 2004-OPT4 Trust

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to A1; previously on 7/15/2004 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 7/15/2004 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 7/15/2004 Assigned
     A3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 7/15/2004 Assigned
     Baa1


ASSET BACKED: Moody's Takes Rating Actions on Various Securities
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the rating of 68
securities, confirmed the rating of 5 securities, and upgraded the
rating of 4 securities from 20 transactions issued by Asset Backed
Securities Corporation.  These actions are part of an ongoing
review of subprime RMBS transactions.

The rating actions are the result of an analysis of credit
enhancement relative to updated collateral loss projections.  The
revised loss projections generally result from deterioration in
collateral performance in recent months.  Additionally, most
affected transactions have, at some point, passed performance
triggers and released portions of credit enhancement.

Moody's approach to analyzing seasoned subprime pools (i.e. prior
to 2H 2005) takes into account the annualized loss rate from last
12 months and the projected loss rate over next 12 months, and
then translates these measures into lifetime losses based on a
deal's expected remaining life.  Recent Losses are calculated by
assessing cumulative losses incurred over the past 12-months as a
percentage of the average pool factor in the last year.  For
Pipeline Losses, Moody's uses an annualized roll rate of 15%, 30%,
65% and 90% for loans that are delinquent 60-days, 90+ days, are
in foreclosure, and REO respectively.  Moody's then applies deal-
specific severity assumptions, in this case ranging from 60% to
80%.  The results of these two calculations -- Recent Losses and
Pipeline Losses -- are weighted to arrive at the lifetime
cumulative loss projection.

The upgrades of the ratings of four tranches are based upon non-
declining credit support due to cumulative losses exceeding their
triggers, requiring all future payments to be paid to the most
senior outstanding bond.

The complete rating actions:

Asset Backed Sec Corp HEL Trust 2001-HE3

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 9/27/2001 Assigned
     Aaa

  -- Cl. M1, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 9/27/2001 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- Cl. M2, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 9/27/2001 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. B, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 9/27/2001 Assigned
     Baa2

Asset Backed Sec Corp Hm Eqty Ln Tr 1999-LB1

  -- A-1F, Downgraded to A3; previously on 11/16/2008 Upgraded to
     A1

  -- A-2F, Downgraded to A3; previously on 11/16/2008 Upgraded to
     A1

Asset Backed Sec Corp Home Eqty Ln Tr 2002-HE1

  -- Cl. M1, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 1/29/2008 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M2, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 1/29/2008 A2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 1/29/2008 Downgraded
     to Caa3

Asset Bckd Sec Corp Home Eqty Ln Tr, 2001-HE1

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/30/2001 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/30/2001 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. B, Downgraded to C; previously on 6/19/2007 Downgraded to
     B3

Asset Bkd Sec Co Home Eqty Loan Tr 2004-HE10

  -- Cl. M2, Downgraded to A1; previously on 1/10/2005 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 1/10/2005 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M4, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 1/10/2005 Assigned
     Baa1

  -- Cl. M5, Downgraded to C; previously on 1/10/2005 Assigned
     Baa2

  -- Cl. M6, Downgraded to C; previously on 6/5/2008 Downgraded to
     Ba3

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2003-HE4

  -- Cl. M2, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 8/22/2003 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 8/22/2003 Assigned
     A3

  -- Cl. M4, Downgraded to B2; previously on 8/22/2003 Assigned
     Baa2

  -- Cl. M5-A, Downgraded to C; previously on 8/23/2007 Downgraded
     to Ba3

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2003-HE5

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 9/11/2003 Assigned
     A3

  -- Cl. M4, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 9/11/2003 Assigned
     Baa2

  -- Cl. M5, Downgraded to C; previously on 8/23/2007 Downgraded
     to B3

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2004-HE1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 4/23/2004 Assigned
     Baa2

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2004-HE2

  -- Cl. M2, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 5/17/2004 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 5/17/2004 Assigned
     A3

  -- Cl. M4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 5/17/2004 Assigned
     Baa1

  -- Cl. M5A, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 5/17/2004 Assigned
     Baa2

  -- Cl. M5B, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 5/17/2004 Assigned
     Baa2

  -- Cl. M6, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/21/2007 Downgraded
     to Ba2

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2004-HE3

  -- Cl. M5, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 6/18/2004 Assigned
     Baa2

  -- Cl. M6, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 9/21/2007 Downgraded
     to Ba1

  -- Cl. M7, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/21/2007 Downgraded
     to B2

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2004-HE4

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to A1; previously on 8/9/2004 Assigned Aa2

  -- Cl. M4, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 6/5/2008 Downgraded
     to Baa3

  -- Cl. M5, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 6/5/2008 Downgraded
     to Ba1

  -- Cl. M6, Downgraded to C; previously on 6/5/2008 Downgraded to
     Caa1

  -- Cl. M7, Downgraded to C; previously on 6/5/2008 Downgraded to
     Ca

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2004-HE5

  -- Cl. M2, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 8/2/2004 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 8/2/2004 Assigned A3

  -- Cl. M4, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 8/2/2004 Assigned
     Baa1

  -- Cl. M5, Downgraded to B3; previously on 8/2/2004 Assigned
     Baa2

  -- Cl. M6, Downgraded to C; previously on 8/2/2004 Assigned Baa3

  -- Cl. M7, Downgraded to C; previously on 8/2/2004 Assigned Ba1

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2004-HE6

  -- Cl. M1, Downgraded to A2; previously on 9/27/2004 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- Cl. M2, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 6/5/2008 Downgraded
     to Baa2

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to B1; previously on 6/5/2008 Downgraded
     to Ba2

  -- Cl. M4, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 6/5/2008 Downgraded
     to B1

  -- Cl. M5, Downgraded to C; previously on 6/5/2008 Downgraded to
     B3

  -- Cl. M6, Downgraded to C; previously on 6/5/2008 Downgraded to
     Caa1

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2004-HE7

  -- Cl. M2, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 12/14/2004 Assigned
     A1

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 12/18/2008
     Downgraded to Baa1

  -- Cl. M4, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 12/18/2008
     Downgraded to Baa3

  -- Cl. M5, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 12/18/2008
     Downgraded to Ba2

  -- Cl. M6, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 12/18/2008 Downgraded
     to B2

  -- Cl. M7, Downgraded to C; previously on 12/18/2008 Downgraded
     to Caa2

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2004-HE8

  -- Cl. M2, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 1/10/2005 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 1/10/2005 Assigned
     A3

  -- Cl. M4, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 3/26/2008 Downgraded
     to Baa3

  -- Cl. M5, Downgraded to C; previously on 3/26/2008 Downgraded
     to Ba2

  -- Cl. M6, Downgraded to C; previously on 3/26/2008 Downgraded
     to B2

  -- Cl. M7, Downgraded to C; previously on 3/26/2008 Downgraded
     to Ca

Long Beach Home Equity Loan Trust 2000-LB1

  -- Cl. M2F, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 6/9/2006 Downgraded
     to Caa2

  -- Cl. M2V, Downgraded to B3; previously on 6/9/2006 Downgraded
     to B1

  -- Cl. BV, Downgraded to C; previously on 1/5/2006 Downgraded to
     Caa3

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Ln Tr 2002-HE3

  -- Cl. M-2, Upgraded to Aaa; previously on 10/31/2002 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M-3, Upgraded to Baa2; previously on 6/9/2006 Downgraded
     to Ba1

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on 6/9/2006
     Downgraded to Ba3

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Ln Tr 2003-HE1

  -- Cl. M2, Upgraded to Aa1; previously on 7/12/2006 Upgraded to
     Aa3

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 8/23/2007
     Downgraded to B3

Asset Bkd Sec Corp Home Eqty Loan Tr 2003-HE2

  -- Cl. M1, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 1/29/2008 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M2, Confirmed at Aa3; previously on 1/29/2008 Aa3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M3, Confirmed at A3; previously on 1/29/2008 A3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M4, Confirmed at Baa2; previously on 1/29/2008 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M5, Confirmed at Ba2; previously on 1/29/2008 Ba2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

Asset Backed Sec Corp Home Eqt Ln Tr 2002-HE2

  -- Cl. M2, Upgraded to Aaa; previously on 6/17/2005 Upgraded to
     Aa3


AVALON CAPITAL: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Avalon Capital Ltd. 3:

  -- US$400,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Notes Due 2019,
     Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 3/2/2005 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$50,000,000 Class A-2 Senior Variable Funding Floating
     Rate Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on
     3/2/2005 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$20,200,000 Class B Floating Rate Notes Due 2019,
     Downgraded to A3; previously on 3/18/2009 Aa2 Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$39,000,000 Class C Floating Rate Deferrable Notes Due
     2019, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/18/2009 Downgraded
     to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$40,800,000 Class D Floating Rate Deferrable Notes Due
     2019, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on 3/18/2009 Downgraded
     to B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of
overcollateralization tests.  The weighted average rating factor
has steadily increased over the last year and it is currently at
2634 versus a test level of 2375 as of the last trustee report,
dated May 11, 2009.  Based on the same report, defaulted
securities total about $57 million, accounting for roughly 10% of
the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1 or lower make up
approximately 14% of the underlying portfolio.  Additionally,
interest payments on the Class D Notes are presently being
deferred as a result of the failure of the Class C
Overcollateralization Test

Avalon Capital Ltd. 3, issued in February 2005, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


AVENUE CLO: Moody's Junks Ratings on Class B-1L & B-1F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd:

  -- US$286,000,000 Class A-L Floating Rate Notes Due 2017,
     Downgraded to Aa3; previously on December 20, 2004 Assigned
     Aaa;

  -- US$34,000,000 Class A-2L Floating Rate Notes Due 2017,
     Downgraded to Baa3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$19,000,000 Class A-3L Floating Rate Notes Due 2017,
     Downgraded to Ba3; previously on March 18, 2009 Downgraded to
     Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$9,000,000 Class B-1L Floating Rate Notes Due 2017,
     Downgraded to Ca; previously on March 18, 2009 Downgraded to
     B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$10,000,000 Class B-1F 6.59% Notes Due 2017, Downgraded
     to Ca; previously on March 18, 2009 Downgraded to B1 and
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$10,000,000 Class B-2L Floating Rate Notes Due 2017,
     Downgraded to C; previously on March 18, 2009 Downgraded to
     Caa2 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class A, Class B-1, and Class B-2L Overcollateralization Tests.
The weighted average rating factor has steadily increased over the
last year and it is currently at 2730 versus a test level of 2400
as of the last trustee report, dated June 4, 2009.  Based on the
same report, defaulted securities total about $49.86 million,
accounting for roughly 12.66% of the collateral balance, and
securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 12.3% of the
underlying portfolio.

Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd., issued in December of 2004, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


AVENUE CLO: Moody's Junks Rating on Class C $13,000,000 Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Avenue CLO IV, Ltd:

  -- US$302,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2018 Downgraded to A3; previously on October 5, 2006
     Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$39,500,000 Class B Second Priority Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes Due 2018 Downgraded to B3; previously on March 17,
     2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$13,000,000 Class C Third Priority Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes Due 2018 Downgraded to Ca; previously on March 17,
     2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$15,500,000 Class D Fourth Priority Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes Due 2018 Downgraded to C; previously on March 17,
     2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class A, Class B, Class C, and Class D Overcollateralization Test.
The weighted average rating factor has steadily increased over the
last year and it is currently at 2829 versus a test level of 2500
as of the last trustee report, dated April 28, 2009.  Based on the
same report, defaulted securities total about $28.9 million,
accounting for roughly 7.6% of the collateral balance, and
securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 10.9% of the
underlying portfolio.  Moody's also notes that a material
proportion of the collateral pool includes debt obligations whose
credit quality has been approximated through Moody's credit
estimates.  Moody's analysis reflects the application of certain
stresses with respect to the default probabilities associated with
any such credit estimates that have not been recently updated.

Avenue CLO IV, Ltd., issued in October of 2006, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


BABSON CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various 2008-I Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Babson CLO Ltd. 2008-I:

  -- US$340,000,000 Class A Senior Floating Rate Notes Due
     2018, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on June 20, 2008 Assigned
     Aaa;

  -- US$18,000,000 Class B Senior Floating Rate Notes Due 2018,
     Downgraded to Baa1; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$13,000,000 Class D Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate
     Notes Due 2018, Downgraded to B2; previously on March 20,
     2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$16,500,000 Class E Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate
     Notes Due 2018, Downgraded to Ca; previously on March 20,
     2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

In addition, Moody's has confirmed the ratings on these notes:

  -- US$16,000,000 Class C-1 Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate
     Notes Due 2018, Confirmed at Ba1; previously on March 20,
     2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$5,000,000 Class C-2 Deferrable Mezzanine Fixed Rate
     Notes Due 2018, Confirmed at Ba1; previously on March 20,
     2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class C, Class D and Class E Overcollateralization Tests.  The
weighted average rating factor has steadily increased over the
last year and it is currently 2921 versus a test level of 2562 as
of the last trustee report, dated May 11, 2009.  Based on the same
report, defaulted securities total about $40 million, accounting
for roughly 9% of the collateral balance, and securities rated
Caa1 or lower make up approximately 11.8% of the underlying
portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments on the Class D and
Class E Notes are presently being deferred as a result of the
failure of the Class C Overcollateralization Test.  Moody's also
assessed the collateral pool's concentration risk in debt
obligations of companies in the banking, finance, real estate, and
insurance industries, which Moody's views to be more strongly
correlated in the current market environment.

Babson CLO Ltd. 2008-I, issued on June 20, 2008, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


BANC OF AMERICA: Fitch Affirms Ratings on 2002-2 Certificates
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings affirms Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.
pass-through certificates, series 2002-2, and revises Outlooks as
indicated:

  -- $143.8 million class A-2 at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- $975.2 million class A-3 at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- Interest only class XC at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- Interest only class XP at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- $64.7 million class B at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- $17.2 million class C at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- $12.9 million class D at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- $17.2 million class E at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- $21.6 million class F at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- $21.6 million class G at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- $19.4 million class H at 'AAA', Outlook Stable;

  -- $21.6 million class J at 'AA', Outlook Stable;

  -- $36.6 million class K at 'A', Outlook Stable;

  -- $12.9 million class L at 'BBB+', Outlook Stable;

  -- $12.9 million class M at 'BB+', Outlook to Negative from
     Stable;

  -- $16.9 million class N at 'BB-', Outlook to Negative from
     Stable;

  -- $6.8 million class O at 'B', Outlook to Negative from Stable.

The $23 million class P is not rated by Fitch. Class A-1 has been
paid in full.

The affirmations are the result of sufficient credit enhancement
and relatively stable performance since Fitch's last rating
actions.  As of the May 2008 distribution report, the transaction
has paid down 17.4% to $1.42 billion from $1.74 billion at
issuance.  Currently, 55 loans (48%) are defeased, including two
shadow rated loans, Bank of America Plaza - Atlanta (9%) and The
Center at Preston Ridge (4.5%).  The Rating Outlooks reflect the
likely direction of any rating changes over the next one to two
years.

Currently, 19 loans are considered Fitch loans of concern (8.6%)
and include four loans in special servicing (2.3%).  The largest
specially serviced loan is secured by a 167-unit multifamily
property in Canton, Michigan.  The loan transferred in December
2008 for imminent default.  As of September 2008, the property was
93% occupied and had a servicer reported debt service coverage
ratio of 0.76 times (x). The special servicer is moving forward
with foreclosure.

The second largest specially serviced loan (0.7%) is secured by a
131,702 square foot office property located in Wayne, New Jersey.
The loan transferred in July 2008 after the borrower indicated
they would no longer be able to pay debt service.  The servicer is
moving forward with foreclosure.  As of March 2008, the property's
servicer reported DSCR was 0.07x.  As of February 2009, occupancy
was 21%.

The final two specially serviced loans (0.4%) are collateralized
by multifamily properties located in the Gulf Coast that have the
same borrower.  These loans transferred to the special servicer
after the borrower refused to reimburse the master servicer for
the force-placed windstorm insurance policy on the properties.
The conflict went through litigation and the trust has prevailed
on all claims related to the force-placed insurance; however, the
borrower has appealed the decision.  The issue is expected to be
resolved before year-end 2009 with no losses.  Additionally, one
of the loans, METRA - Harper's Ferry (0.2%), is fully defeased.

Fitch reviewed the transaction's one non-defeased shadow rated
loan, the Crabtree Valley Mall, (10.9%).  The 998,486 sf mall is
located in Raleigh, North Carolina.  The loan maintains its
investment grade shadow rating based on stable performance.
Occupancy as of December 2008 remains stable at 96%.

The weighted average coupon for loans that remain in the pool is
7.1%.  Non-defeased loans maturing in 2009, 2010, and 2011
represent 1.7%, 0.22%, and 45.4% of the pool, respectively.


BANC OF AMERICA: S&P Corrects Rating on Class 3-A-4 Certificates
----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services  corrected its rating on the
super-senior class 3-A-4 certificates from Banc of America Funding
Trust 2006-6 by raising it to 'AAA' from 'BB'.  In addition, S&P
is affirming the 'AAA' rating on this class.

On June 8, 2009, as part of a larger review of U.S. residential
mortgage-backed securities backed by prime jumbo collateral, S&P
incorrectly lowered the 'AAA' rating on this class due to an
analytical process error.  At the same time, S&P removed the
rating from CreditWatch with negative implications.

The affirmation incorporates S&P's assessment of actual losses to
date and S&P's projected losses based on the dollar amount of
loans currently in the transaction's delinquency, foreclosure, and
real estate owned pipelines, as well as S&P's projection of future
defaults.

Class 3-A-4 benefits from senior support classes designed to
absorb a certain amount of losses before any applicable losses
could affect this class.

                        Rating Corrected

              Banc of America Funding Trust 2006-6
                          Series 2006-6

                                     Rating
                                     ------
    Class   CUSIP        Current     June 8     Pre-June 8
    -----   -----        -------     ------     ----------
    3-A-4   05950RBJ7    AAA         BB         AAA/Watch Neg


BAYVIEW FINANCIAL: Moody's Confirms Ratings on 30 Tranches
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has confirmed the ratings of thirty
tranches issued in ten transactions ($567 million) and downgraded
the ratings of sixty nine tranches issued in eight transactions
($1.2 billion) from the Bayview Financial Mortgage Pass-Through
Trust shelf.  The collateral backing each transaction consists
primarily of first lien adjustable-rate and fixed-rate subprime
and Alt-A mortgage loans.  The pools also include small
percentages of small balance commercial loans (except for 2006-D,
2007-A and 2007-B), insured mortgage loans and "hard money"
mortgages, where loans have low loan-to-value ratios but their
borrowers have very poor payments histories.

The review is triggered by higher than anticipated delinquency
levels and severity of loss as well as slower than anticipated
voluntary prepayments, resulting in higher updated loss
expectation for the underlying collateral and lower coverage for
the rated debt given available credit enhancement.

The ratings on the securities are monitored by evaluating factors
determined to be applicable to the credit profile of the
securities, such as i) the nature, sufficiency, and quality of
historical performance information regarding the asset class ii)
an analysis of the collateral being securitized, iii) an analysis
of the transaction's allocation of collateral cash flow and
capital structure, and (iv) a comparison of these attributes
against those of other similar transactions.

General loss estimation methodology is outlined below, separately
for residential mortgage and for small business or commercial
loans.

Moody's calculates estimated losses for this RMBS collateral mix:

  -- Current delinquencies are used to project pipeline losses.

  -- Annual roll rates are assumed at 0% for 30 days, 15% for 60
     days, 30% for 90 days, 65% for foreclosures and 90% for REO.

  -- Severities are based on actual historical severity for each
     pool.

  -- Loss is calculated for the previous year.  Expected annual
     loss is then derived from a weighted average of previous year
     loss and expected pipeline loss.  The transaction expected
     loss is projected out over the deal's expected remaining
     life.  Depending on a transaction's time of origination, a
     75% weight can be applied to pipeline loss when it is
     considered to be more representative of future expected
     performance than the previous year's losses.

  -- Expected loss is finally compared to credit enhancement to
     derive a rating.

With respect to small balance commercial subpools, Moody's
observed a rapid increase in late stage delinquencies over the
past year as well as cumulative defaults to date.  Moody's has
reassessed cumulative expected defaults based on the analysis of
the delinquency pipeline, delinquency roll rates and assumptions
about the duration of the current economic downcycle.

Loss estimates are subject to variability and, as a result,
realized losses could ultimately turn out higher or lower than
Moody's current expectations.  Moody's will continue to evaluate
performance data as it becomes available and will assess the
pattern of potential future defaults and adjust loss expectations
accordingly if necessary.

Complete rating actions are:

Bayview Financial Mtge Pass-Through Tr 2004-C

  -- Cl. M-2, Confirmed at Aa1; previously on 5/21/2009 Aa1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Confirmed at Aa3; previously on 5/21/2009 Aa3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Confirmed at A3; previously on 5/21/2009 A3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B, Confirmed at Baa3; previously on 5/21/2009 Baa3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

Bayview Financial Mtge Pass-Through Tr 2005-B

  -- Cl. M-1, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Confirmed at Aa1; previously on 5/21/2009 Aa1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Confirmed at Aa3; previously on 5/21/2009 Aa3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Confirmed at A3; previously on 5/21/2009 A3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B-1, Confirmed at Baa2; previously on 5/21/2009 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

Bayview Financial Mtge Pass-Through Tr 2005-C

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 5/21/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 5/21/2009 A3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B-1, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 5/21/2009 Baa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B-2, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 5/21/2009 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B-3, Confirmed at B3; previously on 5/21/2009 B3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

Bayview Financial Mtge Pass-Through Tr 2005-D

  -- Cl. AF-4, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-PO, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to A1; previously on 5/21/2009 Aa1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to A3; previously on 5/21/2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 5/21/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 5/21/2009 Baa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 5/21/2009 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-6, Confirmed at Ba3; previously on 5/21/2009 Ba3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B-1, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 5/21/2009 Caa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

Bayview Financial Mtge Pass-Thru Tr 2006-A

  -- Cl. 1-A2, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A3, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A4, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A5, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A3, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A4, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to A2; previously on 5/21/2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 5/21/2009 Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 5/21/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 5/21/2009 A3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B-1, Confirmed at B1; previously on 5/21/2009 B1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B-2, Confirmed at Caa1; previously on 5/21/2009 Caa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

Bayview Financial Mtge Pass-Thru Tr 2006-B

  -- Cl. 1-A2, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A3, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A4, Downgraded to A3; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A5, Downgraded to A1; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A3, Downgraded to A2; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A4, Downgraded to A1; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 5/21/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 5/21/2009 Baa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to B3; previously on 5/21/2009 B2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 5/21/2009 B3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B-1, Downgraded to C; previously on 5/21/2009 Caa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to Ca

Bayview Financial Mtge Pass-Thru Tr 2006-C

  -- Cl. 1-A1, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A2, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A3, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A4, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A5, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A1, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A2, Downgraded to A2; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A3, Downgraded to B3; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A4, Downgraded to B2; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to Ca

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to Ca

  -- Cl. B-1, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to Ca

Bayview Financial Mtge Pass-Thru Tr 2006-D

  -- Cl. 1-A2, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A3, Downgraded to A2; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A4, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A5, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A2, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A3, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A4, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to B3; previously on 5/21/2009 A2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 5/21/2009 Baa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. B-1, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to Ca

  -- Cl. B-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to Ca

Bayview Financial Mtge Pass-Thru Tr 2007-A

  -- Cl. 1-A1, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A2, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A3, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A4, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A5, Downgraded to A2; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-IO, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on 5/21/2009 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 5/21/2009 B1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 5/21/2009 Caa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

Bayview Financial Mtge Pass-Thru Tr 2007-B

  -- Cl. 1-A1, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A2, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A3, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A4, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A5, Downgraded to B3; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A1, Downgraded to A1; previously on 5/21/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A2, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A3, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A4, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-IO, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 9/18/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to C; previously on 5/21/2009 Ba3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to B2 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to C; previously on 5/21/2009 Caa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 9/18/2008 Downgraded
     to Ca


BEAR STEARNS: Fitch Puts Ratings on 2007-PWR18 Notes on Neg. Watch
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings places these 17 classes of Bear Stearns Commercial
Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-PWR18 on Rating Watch Negative:

  -- $182.5 million class A-J 'AAA';
  -- $33.6 million class A-JA 'AAA';
  -- $25 million class B 'AA+';
  -- $25 million class C 'AA'; ;
  -- $18 million class D 'AA-'
  -- $25 million class E 'A+';
  -- $18.8 million class F 'A';
  -- $25 million class G 'A-';
  -- $21.9 million class H 'BBB+';
  -- $18.8 million class J 'BBB';
  -- $25 million class K 'BBB-';
  -- $9.4 million class L 'BB+';
  -- $9.4 million class M 'BB';
  -- $9.4 million class N 'BB-';
  -- $6.3 million class O 'B+';
  -- $3.1 million class P 'B';
  -- $3.1 million class Q 'B-'.

The Negative Watch reflects the transfer of five loans (12.5%) to
special servicing since Fitch's last rating action.  This brings
the total number of loans in special servicing to six, which
represents 12.9% of the pool.  Four of the specially serviced
loans (3.8%) are delinquent.  Additionally, there is one loan in
the pool (1.8%) that is 60+ days delinquent which Fitch considers
to have a high likelihood of transferring to the special servicer
in the near future.

Two of the transfers are related to the General Growth Properties
bankruptcy.  GGP is the sponsor of the largest specially serviced
loan (6.3%), GGP Portfolio, and the third largest specially
serviced loan (2.8%), Southlake Mall.  Both loans transferred in
April 2009 after GGP filed for bankruptcy, and both properties
were included in the filing.  At a minimum, CMBS trusts, which
include GGP loans, will incur additional servicing fees.

The second largest specially serviced loan (3.1%), RRI Portfolio,
is collateralized by 79 hotels in 24 states.  The loan transferred
to special servicing on June 5, 2009, for monetary default.

Fitch expects to resolve the Negative Watch status of these
classes in the next 60 days, and will incorporate updated
information on the specially serviced loans as it becomes
available.


BEAR STEARNS: Moody's Cuts Ratings on Six 2007-HE7 Securities
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the ratings of 6
securities issued by Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust
2007-HE7.

The collateral backing this transaction consists primarily of
first-lien, fixed- and adjustable-rate, subprime residential
mortgage loans.  The actions are triggered by a combination of
factors that can include increased delinquencies, higher loss
severities, slower prepayments and mounting losses in the
underlying collateral.  Additionally, the continued deterioration
of the housing market has also contributed to the increased loss
expectations for subprime pools.  The actions listed below reflect
Moody's updated loss projections for the subprime RMBS sector
first announced in a press release on February 29, 2009, and are
part of Moody's on-going review process.

Moody's final rating actions are based on collateral performance
and updated pool-level loss expectations relative to current
levels of tranche-specific credit enhancement.  Moody's took into
account credit enhancement provided by subordination, cross-
collateralization, excess spread, time tranching, and other
structural features.

Complete rating actions are:

Issuer: Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-HE7

  -- Cl. I-A-1, Downgraded to B1; previously on 2/26/2009 A1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-1, Downgraded to B3; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-2, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. III-A-1, Downgraded to B3; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. III-A-2, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade


BLUE MOUNTAIN: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Blue Mountain CLO II Ltd.:

  -- $215,000,000 Class A Senior Floating Rate Notes Due 2018
     Downgraded to Aa3; previously on August 3, 2006 Assigned Aaa

  -- $80,000,000 Class A-2 Senior Delayed Draw Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2018 Downgraded to Aa3; previously on August 3, 2006
     Assigned Aaa

  -- $23,000,000 Class B Senior Floating Rate Notes Due 2018
     Downgraded to Baa1; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- $24,000,000 Class C Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2018 Downgraded to Ba2; previously on March 17, 2009
     Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade

  -- $15,500,000 Class D Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2018 Downgraded to B3; previously on March 17, 2009
     Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade

  -- $11,500,000 Class E Deferrable Junior Floating Rate Notes Due
     2018 Downgraded to Ca; previously on March 17, 2009
     Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities and an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below.  The weighted
average rating factor has steadily increased over the last year
and it is currently at 2915 versus a test level of 2700 as of the
last trustee report, dated May 22, 2009.  Based on the same
report, defaulted securities total about $20.7 million, accounting
for roughly 5.3% of the collateral balance, and securities rated
Caa1 or lower make up approximately 8.5% of the Portfolio
Collateral Value.  Moody's also assessed the collateral pool's
elevated concentration risk in a small number of obligors and
industries.  This includes a significant concentration in debt
obligations of companies in the banking, finance, real estate, and
insurance industries, which Moody's views to be more strongly
correlated in the current market environment.

Blue Mountain CLO II Ltd., issued in July 2006, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


BRENTWOOD CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Brentwood CLO, Ltd.:

  -- US$388,700,000 Class A-1A Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Extendable Notes Due 2022, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on
     December 21, 2006 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$75,000,000 Class A-1B Delayed Drawdown Floating Rate
     Senior Secured Extendable Notes Due 2022, Downgraded to Aa3;
     previously on December 21, 2006 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$51,500,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Extendable Notes Due 2022, Downgraded to A3; previously on
     March 4, 2009 Aaa Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$68,600,000 Class B Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Deferrable Interest Extendable Notes Due 2022, Downgraded to
     Ba3; previously on March 23, 2009 Downgraded to Ba2 and
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$23,800,000 Class C Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Deferrable Interest Extendable Notes Due 2022, Downgraded to
     Caa3; previously on March 23, 2009 Downgraded to Caa1 and
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$21,000,000 Class D Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Deferrable Interest Extendable Notes Due 2022, Downgraded to
     C; previously on March 23, 2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the application of certain stresses with
respect to the default probabilities associated with certain
Moody's credit estimates, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.  Moody's has also applied
resecuritization stress factors to default probability assumptions
for structured finance asset collateral as described in the press
release titled "Moody's updates its key assumptions for rating
structured finance CDOs," published on December 11, 2008.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, failure of the Class
A, Class B, Class C, and Class D Overcollateralization Tests.  The
weighted average rating factor has steadily increased over the
last year and it is currently at 3147 versus a test level of 2840
as of the last trustee report, dated April 21, 2009.  Based on the
same report, defaulted securities total about $58 million,
accounting for roughly 8.6% of the collateral balance, and
securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 12.9% of the
underlying portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments on the
Class B, C, and D Notes are presently being deferred as a result
of the failure of the Class A, Class B, and Class C
Overcollateralization Tests.  Moody's also assessed the collateral
pool's concentration risk in companies in the banking, finance,
real estate, and insurance industries, which Moody's views to be
more strongly correlated in the current market environment.

Moody's also observes that the transaction is exposed to a number
of mezzanine and junior CLO tranches in the underlying portfolio.
The majority of these CLO tranches are currently assigned low
speculative-grade ratings and carry depressed market valuations
that may herald poor recovery prospects in the event of default.

Brentwood CLO, Ltd., issued in December of 2006, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


BUSINESS LOAN: Fitch Takes Rating Actions on Four Transactions
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings takes these rating actions on four Business Loan
Express transactions:

Business Loan Express SBA loan-backed adjustable-rate notes,
series 1998-1

  -- Class A downgraded to 'AA' from 'AAA'; remains on Rating
     Watch Negative.

Business Loan Express SBA loan-backed adjustable-rate notes,
series 2001-2

  -- Class A downgraded to 'BBB' from 'A'; remains on Rating Watch
     Negative;

  -- Class M downgraded to 'B' from 'BB'; removed from Rating
     Watch Negative.

Business Loan Express SBA loan-backed adjustable-rate notes,
series 2002-1

  -- Class A downgraded to 'AA' from 'AAA'; removed from Rating
     Watch Negative;

  -- Class M downgraded to 'BBB' from 'A'; removed from Rating
     Watch Negative.

Business Loan Express Business loan-backed adjustable-rate notes,
series 2002-A

  -- Class A affirmed at 'AAA'; removed from Rating Watch
     Negative;

  -- Class B affirmed at 'A'; removed from Rating Watch Negative.

The negative rating actions reflect a continued deterioration
within the transactions. Specifically, the transactions have
continued to experience high delinquencies.  As of May 2009
reporting, 30+ day delinquencies represented 38.26%, 25.94%, and
21.61% of the 1998-1, 2001-2, and 2002-1 pools, respectively.
Furthermore, the 2001-2 and 2002-1 series are currently
undercollateralized.  Based on current delinquency trends, Fitch's
analysis, detailed below, anticipates available credit support to
decline for the outstanding notes.

Additionally, the 1998-1 and 2001-2 transactions have continued to
experience consistent delinquency bucket roll-forward rates. Based
on historical performance, Fitch expects this trend to continue,
which may result in further deterioration within the pools, and
further declines in credit support for the senior notes.  As a
result, the class A notes for both the 1998-1 and 2001-2 series
remain on Rating Watch Negative.

The affirmations for the 2002-A series reflect relatively stable
performance within the transaction. Although delinquencies have
increased in recent months, with 30+ day delinquencies currently
representing 16.07% of the pool, the transaction has not
experienced additional net losses since Fitch's last review.
Based on Fitch's analysis, credit support remains sufficient for
the current rating levels.

The transactions were initially placed on Watch Negative on March
13, 2009, due to Fitch's concern regarding increasing delinquency
trends.  Additionally, the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing by the
servicer in September 2008 remains a concern for Fitch.  Fitch
will continue to closely monitor these transactions and may take
additional rating action in the event of changes in performance
and credit enhancement measures.

In its analysis, Fitch reviewed the transactions on an individual
loan basis.  As evidenced by recent roll rates within the
transactions, early stage delinquencies have a high likelihood of
rolling forward to later stage buckets.  Accordingly, Fitch deemed
all loans over 45 days delinquent as defaulted loans.  Loss and
recovery expectations were applied on the loans based on
collateral characteristics (i.e. real estate, machinery and
equipment, and accounts receivables) and historical recovery
performance.

Furthermore, additional haircuts were applied on various late
stage delinquency buckets due to the historical roll rates seen
within these late stage delinquency buckets.  After determining
expected losses on each loan, these expectations were applied to
outstanding balances.  Fitch was then able to assess the impact on
enhancement levels.


CABCO TRUST: Moody's Upgrades Ratings on Trust Certs. to 'Ba1'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has upgraded its
rating of Trust Certificates issued by CABCO Trust for J. C.
Penney Debentures.

The rating action is:

Class Description: Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Ba1
  -- Prior Rating: Ba3
  -- Prior Rating Date: 06/12/2002

The transaction is a structured note whose ratings are based on
the rating of the Term Assets and the legal structure of the
transaction.


CANNINGTON FUNDING: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Cannington Funding Ltd.:

  -- US$337,500,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes Due
     2020, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 12/5/2006 Assigned
     Aaa;

  -- US$26,000,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Notes Due
     2020, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/4/2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$20,000,000 Class C Floating Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes Due 2020, Downgraded to B2; previously on
     3/17/2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$14,000,000 Class D Floating Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes Due 2020, Downgraded to Ca; previously on
     3/17/2009 Downgraded to Caa1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

In addition, Moody's has confirmed the ratings on these notes:

  -- US$26,000,000 Class B Floating Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes Due 2020, Confirmed at Ba1; previously on
     3/17/2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.  Moody's has also applied
resecuritization stress factors to default probability assumptions
for structured finance asset collateral as described in the press
release titled "Moody's updates its key assumptions for rating
structured finance CDOs," published on December 11, 2008.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Overcollateralization Ratio Tests.  The weighted average rating
factor has steadily increased over the last year and it is
currently at 2561 versus a test level of 2410 as of the last
trustee report, dated May 13, 2009.  Based on the same report,
defaulted securities total about $25.2 million, accounting for
roughly 5.6% of the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1
or lower make up approximately 15.4% of the underlying portfolio.
Additionally, interest payments on the Class C Notes and Class D
Notes are presently being deferred as a result of the failure of
the Overcollateralization Ratio Tests.  Finally, Moody's noted
that the portfolio includes a number of investments in securities
that mature after the maturity date of the notes.  These
investments potentially expose the notes to market risk in the
event of liquidation at the time of the notes' maturity.

Moody's also observes that the transaction is exposed to a number
of mezzanine and junior CLO tranches in the underlying portfolio.
The majority of these CLO tranches are currently assigned
speculative-grade ratings and carry depressed market valuations
that may herald poor recovery prospects in the event of default.

Cannington Funding Ltd,, issued on November 16, 2006, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


CAPMARK INVESTMENTS: Fitch Withdraws CDO Asset Manager Rating
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has withdrawn the 'CAM2' collateralized debt
obligation asset manager rating assigned to Capmark Investments
L.P., as a manager of CDOs backed by commercial real estate
assets.  A 'CAM2' rating reflects asset manager operations
demonstrating low vulnerability to operational and investment
management failure.

On March 2, 2009, Fitch downgraded Capmark Investment's CAM rating
to 'CAM2' from 'CAM1-' and simultaneously placed it on Rating
Watch Negative.  The rating actions reflected the weakening
financial condition of Capmark Investment's parent company,
Capmark Financial Group, Inc., as evidenced by the downgrade and
placement on Rating Watch Negative of Capmark Financial's Issuer
Default Rating to 'B-' from 'BBB-' on February 26, 2009.

Given the lack of future access to senior management of Capmark
Investments, Fitch does not believe it has sufficient information
in order to maintain the CAM rating at this time.  Furthermore,
since the financial condition of Capmark Financial and its impact
on Capmark Investments, remains uncertain, Fitch does not believe
it has sufficient information to resolve the Rating Watch Negative
status of the CAM rating prior to withdrawal.


CDX.NA.HY.8 TRUST: Moody's Junks Rating on $1.3 Bil. Certs.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$1,300,000,000 CDX.NA.HY.8-1 7.625% Credit-Linked Pass
Through Trust Certificates issued by CDX.NA.HY.8 Trust 1 June
2012.

The rating action is:

Class Description: US$1,300,000,000 CDX.NA.HY.8-1 7.625% Credit-
Linked Pass Through Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Caa3
  -- Prior Rating: B3
  -- Prior Rating Date: 04/03/2007

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


CDX.NA.HY.8 TRUST: Moody's Junks Ratings on $350 Mil. Certs.
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$350,000,000 CDX.NA.HY.8-2 6.675% Credit-Linked Pass
Through Trust Certificates issued by CDX.NA.HY.8 Trust 2
June 2012.

The rating action is:
Class Description: US$350,000,000 CDX.NA.HY.8-2 6.675% Credit-
Linked Pass Through Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Caa2
  -- Prior Rating: B2
  -- Prior Rating Date: 11/07/2008

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


CDX.NA.HY.8 TRUST: Moody's Junks Ratings on $500 Mil. Certs.
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$500,000,000 CDX.NA.HY.8-3 7.50% Credit-Linked Pass
Through Trust Certificates issued by CDX.NA.HY.8 Trust 3 June
2012.

The rating action is:

Class Description: US$500,000,000 CDX.NA.HY.8-3 7.50% Credit-
Linked Pass Through Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Caa2
  -- Prior Rating: B2
  -- Prior Rating Date: 04/03/2007

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


CDX.NA.HY.9 TRUST: Moody's Cuts Rating on $700MM Certs. to 'Caa3'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$700,000,000 CDX.NA.HY.9-1 8.75% Credit-Linked Pass
Through Trust Certificates issued by CDX.NA.HY.9 Trust 1 December
2012.

The rating action is:

Class Description: US$700,000,000 CDX.NA.HY.9-1 8.75% Credit-
Linked Pass Through Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Caa3
  -- Prior Rating: Caa1
  -- Prior Rating Date: 11/07/2008

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


CDX.NA.HY.9 TRUST: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $625MM Certs. to 'Caa3'
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$625,000,000 CDX.NA.HY.9-2 7.75% Credit-Linked Pass
Through Trust Certificates issued by CDX.NA.HY.9 Trust 2 December
2010.

The rating action is:

Class Description: US$625,000,000 CDX.NA.HY.9-2 7.75% Credit-
Linked Pass Through Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Caa3
  -- Prior Rating: Caa1
  -- Prior Rating Date: 11/07/2008

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


CENT CDO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Cent CDO XI Limited:

  -- $543,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes Due 2019
     Downgraded to Aa2; previously on March 31, 2006 Assigned Aaa;

  -- $36,000,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Notes Due 2019
     Downgraded to A3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- $39,000,000 Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Senior
     Subordinate Notes Due 2019 Downgraded to B2; previously on
     March 17, 2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade

In addition, Moody's has confirmed the rating on these notes:

  -- $30,000,000 Class B Deferrable Floating Rate Senior Notes Due
     2019 Confirmed at Ba1; previously on March 17, 2009
     Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities and an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below.  The weighted
average rating factor has steadily increased over the last year
and it is currently at 2798 versus a test level of 2550 as of the
last trustee report, dated May 18, 2009.  Based on the same
report, defaulted securities total about $40.5 million, accounting
for roughly 6% of the collateral balance, and securities rated
Caa1 or lower make up approximately 12% of the underlying
portfolio.

Cent CDO XI Limited, issued in March 2006, is a collateralized
loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


CHASE MORTGAGE: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Nine 2006-S1 Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded 9 tranches from Chase
Mortgage Finance Trust 2006-S1.

The collateral backing these transactions consists primarily of
first-lien, fixed and adjustable rate, Jumbo mortgage loans.  The
actions are triggered by the quickly deteriorating performance --
marked by rising delinquencies and loss severities, along with
concerns about the continuing drop in housing prices nationwide
and the rising unemployment levels.  The actions listed below
reflect Moody's updated expected losses on the jumbo sector
announced in a press release on March 19, 2009, and are part of
Moody's on-going review process.

Moody's final rating actions are based on current ratings, level
of credit enhancement, collateral performance and updated pool-
level loss expectations relative to current level of credit
enhancement.  Moody's took into account credit enhancement
provided by seniority, cross-collateralization, time tranching,
and other structural features within the senior note waterfalls.

Loss estimates are subject to variability and are sensitive to
assumptions used; as a result, realized losses could ultimately
turn out higher or lower than Moody's current expectations.
Moody's will continue to evaluate performance data as it becomes
available and will assess the pattern of potential future defaults
and adjust loss expectations accordingly as necessary.

Complete rating actions are:

Issuer: Chase Mortgage Finance Trust 2006-S1

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-2, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-3, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-4, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-5, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-6, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 A1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-7, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-8, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-P, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

The ratings on the notes were assigned after evaluating factors
determined applicable to the credit profile of the notes, such as:

  i) the nature, sufficiency, and quality of historical
     performance information available for the asset class as well
     as for the transaction sponsor,

ii) collateral analysis,

iii) an analysis of the policies, procedures and alignment of
     interests of the key parties to the transaction, most notably
     the originator and the servicer,

iv) an analysis of the transaction's allocation of collateral
     cashflow and capital structure,

  v) an analysis of the transaction's governance and legal
     structure, and

vi) a comparison of these attributes against those of other
     similar transactions.


CHATHAM LIGHT: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded and
left under review for possible downgrade the ratings of these
notes issued by Chatham Light CLO, Limited:

  -- US$27,000,000 Class B Fixed Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes due 2017, Downgraded to B3 and Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgrade; previously on April 16, 2009
     Baa2 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

In addition, Moody's downgraded the ratings of these notes:

  -- US$19,000,000 Class C-1 Floating Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes due 2017, Downgraded to C; previously on
     April 16, 2009 Ba2 Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$5,000,000 Class C-2 Fixed Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes due 2017, Downgraded to C; previously on
     April 16, 2009 Ba2 Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below and failure of the
Class B and Class C OC Tests.  The weighted average rating factor
has steadily increased over the last year and it is currently at
3338 versus a test level of 2593 as of the last trustee report,
dated May 8, 2009.  Based on the same report, defaulted securities
total about $47 million, accounting for roughly 9% of the
collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1 or lower make up
approximately 23% of the underlying portfolio.  Additionally,
interest payments on the Class C Notes are presently being
deferred as a result of the failure of the B OC Test.

Class A-2 Notes and Class B Notes remain on review for possible
downgrade as a result of the additional risk posed to the
noteholders due to the action taken by Moody's on the insurance
financial strength rating of Financial Security Assurance Inc.,
which acts as guarantor under the Investment Agreement in the
transaction.  On May 20, 2009, Moody's placed the financial
strength rating of Financial Security Assurance Inc. on review for
possible downgrade.

Chatham Light CLO, Limted, issued on December 15, 2004, is a
synthetic collateralized loan obligation referencing primarily a
portfolio of senior secured loans.


CHL MORTGAGE: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 196 Tranches
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded 196 tranches and
confirmed 2 tranches from 10 CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust deals
issued in 2005.

The collateral backing these transactions consists primarily of
first-lien, fixed and adjustable-rate, Jumbo mortgage loans.  The
actions are triggered by the quickly deteriorating performance --
marked by rising delinquencies and loss severities, along with
concerns about the continuing drop in housing prices nationwide
and the rising unemployment levels.  The actions listed below
reflect Moody's updated expected losses on the jumbo sector
announced in a press release on March 19th, 2009, and are part of
Moody's on-going review process.

Moody's final rating actions are based on current ratings, level
of credit enhancement, collateral performance and updated pool-
level loss expectations relative to current level of credit
enhancement.  Moody's took into account credit enhancement
provided by seniority, cross-collateralization, time tranching,
and other structural features within the senior note waterfalls.

Loss estimates are subject to variability and are sensitive to
assumptions used; as a result, realized losses could ultimately
turn out higher or lower than Moody's current expectations.
Moody's will continue to evaluate performance data as it becomes
available and will assess the pattern of potential future defaults
and adjust loss expectations accordingly as necessary.

Complete rating actions are:

CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-10

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-2, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-3, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-4, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. PO, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-12

  -- Cl. 1-A-1, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-2, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-3, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-5, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-6, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-1, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-2, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-3, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-5, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-6, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-7, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-8, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-9, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-10, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-11, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. PO, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-16

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-2, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-3, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-4, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-5, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-6, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-7, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-8, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-9, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-10, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-11, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-12, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-13, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-14, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-15, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-16, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-17, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-18, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-19, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-20, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-21, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-22, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-23, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-24, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-25, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-26, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-27, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-28, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-29, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-30, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-31, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. PO, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-19

  -- Cl. 1-A-1, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-2, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-3, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-4, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-5, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-6, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-7, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-8, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-9, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-10, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-1, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-2, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-3, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-4, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. PO, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-21

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-2, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-3, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-5, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-6, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-7, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-8, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-9, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-10, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-11, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-12, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-13, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-14, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-15, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-16, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-17, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-18, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-19, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-20, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-21, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-22, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-23, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-24, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-25, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-26, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-27, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-28, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-29, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-30, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-31, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-32, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-33, Downgraded to Aa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-34, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-35, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-36, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-37, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-38, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-39, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-40, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-1, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-2, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-3, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-4, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. PO, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-25

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-2, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-3, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-4, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-5, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-6, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-7, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-8, Downgraded to Aa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-9, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-10, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-11, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-12, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-13, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-14, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-15, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-16, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-17, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. PO, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-27

  -- Cl. 1-A-1, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-2, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-3, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-4, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-5, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-6, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-7, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-8, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-X, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-1, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-X, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. PO, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-31

  -- Cl. 1-A-1, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-1, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-2, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-3, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-1, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-2, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 4-A-1, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 4-A-2, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 4-A-3, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 4-A-4, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-6

  -- Cl. 1-A-1, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-2, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-3, Downgraded to Aa2 and remains on Review for
     Possible Downgrade; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-5, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-7, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-8, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-9, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-10, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-11, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-12, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-13, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-14, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-15, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-16, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-1, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. PO, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-J2

  -- Cl. 1-A-2, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-3, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-1, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-2, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-3, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-4, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-5, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-X, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-1, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-2, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-3, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-4, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-5, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-6, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-7, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-8, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-9, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-10, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-11, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-12, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-13, Downgraded to B2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-14, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-16, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-X, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. PO, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

The ratings on the notes were assigned after evaluating factors
determined applicable to the credit profile of the notes, such as:

i) the nature, sufficiency, and quality of historical performance
information available for the asset class as well as for the
transaction sponsor,

ii) collateral analysis,

iii) an analysis of the policies, procedures and alignment of
     interests of the key parties to the transaction, most notably
     the originator and the servicer,

iv) an analysis of the transaction's allocation of collateral
     cashflow and capital structure,

  v) an analysis of the transaction's governance and legal
     structure, and

vi) a comparison of these attributes against those of other
     similar transactions.


CIFG ASSURANCE: S&P Junks Ratings on Eight Medium-Term Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on eight
CIFG Assurance North America Inc. insurance-supported medium-term
note issues to 'CC' from 'BB'.

The lowered ratings are based solely on the full financial
guarantee insurance policies provided by CIFG, which guarantee the
timely payment of interest and principal according to the
transactions' terms.

According to S&P's criteria, the issue rating on an insured bond
reflects the higher of the rating on the bond insurer (monoline)
or Standard & Poor's underlying rating on the securities.  Since
S&P did not assign SPURs to these transactions, the lowered
ratings are based solely on the insurance policies that CIFG
provides.

The rating actions follow the June 15, 2009, lowering of S&P's
financial strength rating on CIFG to 'CC' from 'BB'.

                         Ratings Lowered

                  Republic Holdings Texas II L.P.

                                         Rating
                                         ------
         Series     CUSIP            To             From
         ------     -----            --             ----
         2008-A     760488AB2        CC             BB
         2008-B     760488AD8        CC             BB
         2008-C     760488AF3        CC             BB

                Whitecap New York Growth Fund LLC

                                         Rating
                                         ------
         Series     CUSIP            To             From
         ------     -----            --             ----
         2004       96466TAA9        CC             BB

              Whitecap New York Growth Fund II LLC

                                         Rating
                                         ------
         Series   CUSIP            To             From
         ------   -----            --             ----
         2005     96466QAA5        CC             BB

              Whitecap Texas Opportunity Fund L.P.

                                       Rating
                                       ------
         Series   CUSIP            To             From
         ------   -----            --             ----
         2005     96466VAA4        CC             BB

             Whitecap Texas Opportunity Fund II L.P.

                                        Rating
                                        ------
         Series    CUSIP            To             From
         ------    -----            --             ----
         2008A     96466YAA8        CC             BB
         2008B     96466YAB6        CC             BB


CLYDESDALE CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Clydesdale CLO 2003 Ltd.:

  -- US$234,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2015, Downgraded to A1; previously on September 25, 2003
     Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$19,000,000 Class B Second Priority Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2015, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on March 20, 2009
     Downgraded to Baa2 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$13,000,000 Class C Third Priority Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2015, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on March 20, 2009
     Downgraded to Ba3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$10,000,000 Class D Fourth Priority Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes Due 2018, Downgraded to C; previously on March 20,
     2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in, among
other metrics, a decline in the average credit rating (as measured
through the weighted average rating factor), an increase in the
dollar amount of defaulted securities, an increase in the
proportion of securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and
failure of Class C and Class D Overcollateralization Tests.  The
weighted average rating factor has steadily increased over the
last year and it is currently at 2764 versus a test level of 2230
as of the last trustee report, dated May 8, 2009.  Based on the
same report, defaulted securities total about $22 million
accounting for roughly 7.74% of the collateral balance.
Additionally, interest payments on the Class D Notes are presently
being deferred as a result of the failure of the Class C
Overcollateralization Test.

Clydesdale CLO 2003 Ltd., issued in September of 2003, is a
collateralized loan obligation, backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


COMSTOCK FUNDING: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Comstock Funding Ltd.:

  -- US$45,000,000 Class A-1A Floating Rate Senior Revolving
     Notes Due 2020, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on June 7, 2006
     Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$280,500,000 Class A-lB Floating Rate Senior Notes Due
     2020, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on June 7, 2006 Assigned
     Aaa;

  -- US$22,500,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Notes Due
     2020, Downgraded to A3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$19,000,000 Class A-3 Floating Rate Senior Notes Due
     2020, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$23,000,000 Class B Floating Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes Due 2020, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on
     March 17, 2009 Downgraded to Ba2 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$25,000,000 Class C Floating Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes Due 2020, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on
     March 17, 2009 Downgraded to B2 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$14,000,000 Class D Floating Rate Deferrable Subordinate
     Notes Due 2020, Downgraded to C; previously on March 17, 2009
     Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.  Moody's has also applied
resecuritization stress factors to default probability assumptions
for structured finance asset collateral as described in the press
release titled "Moody's updates its key assumptions for rating
structured finance CDOs," published on December 11, 2008.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating, an increase in the dollar
amount of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and the failure of
all overcollateralization tests.  The amount of defaulted
securities has steadily increased over the last year and currently
totals about $21.6 million, accounting for roughly 4.8% of the
collateral balance as of the latest trustee report, dated May 19,
2009.  Based on the same report, securities rated Caa1 or lower
make up approximately 15.7% of the underlying portfolio.
Additionally, interest payments on the Class B, C and D Notes are
presently being deferred as a result of the failure of the Class
A, B, and C overcollateralization tests.

Moody's also observes that the transaction is exposed to a
significant concentration of mezzanine and junior CLO tranches in
the underlying portfolio.  The majority of these CLO tranches are
currently assigned low speculative-grade ratings and carry
depressed market valuations that may herald poor recovery
prospects in the event of default.

Comstock Funding Ltd., issued in June 2006, is a collateralized
loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.

In addition to the quantitative factors that are explicitly
modeled, qualitative factors are part of the rating committee
considerations.  These qualitative factors include the structural
protections in each transaction, the recent deal performance in
the current market environment, the legal environment, specific
documentation features, the collateral manager's track record, and
the potential for selection bias in the portfolio.  All
information available to rating committees, including
macroeconomic forecasts, input from other Moody's analytical
groups, market factors, and judgments regarding the nature and
severity of credit stress on the transactions, may influence the
final rating decision.


COSTA BELLA: Fitch Downgrades Ratings on Eight Classes of Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings downgrades, assigns Recovery Ratings, and withdraws
the ratings of eight classes of notes issued by Costa Bella CDO
Ltd./Corp.:

  -- $221,708,772 class A-1 notes to 'D/RR6' from 'CCC';
     withdrawn;

  -- $40,000,000 class A-2 notes to 'D/RR6' from 'CC'; withdrawn;

  -- $30,000,000 class B notes to 'D/RR6' from 'CC'; withdrawn;

  -- $5,000,000 class C notes to 'D/RR6' from 'CC'; withdrawn;

  -- $23,315,661 class D notes to 'D/RR6' from 'CC'; withdrawn;

  -- $18,682,128 class E notes to 'D/RR6' from 'CC'; withdrawn;

  -- $10,945,604 class F notes to 'D/RR6' from 'C'; withdrawn;

  -- $8,046,788 class G notes to 'D/RR6' from 'C'; withdrawn.

Costa Bella declared an event of default on April 22, 2008 when
the Sequential Pay Ratio fell below 100%.  This EOD was the result
of extensive collateral deterioration, specifically the weak
performance of residential mortgage-backed securities, as 90.9% of
the portfolio is rated below investment grade, of which 85.1% is
considered 'CCC+' or below.  As a remedy to the EOD, the majority
of the controlling class (class A-1) directed the trustee to
declare the principal and accrued and unpaid interest of all of
the notes to be immediately due and payable, and the majority of
the controlling class and the class A-2 noteholders (together,
voting as a single class) notified the trustee that they were
exercising the right to direct the trustee to sell and liquidate
the collateral.  Subsequently, the liquidation proceeds were
distributed in accordance with the liquidation priority of
payments on the final distribution date, Jan. 15, 2009.

Furthermore, on the final distribution date the class A-1 notes
received $19.8 million, an 8.2% recovery, leaving the notes with a
$221.7 million cumulative principal loss, or 88.7% ultimate
principal loss.  Over the life of the transaction, the class A-1
notes delevered only 11.3%.  The class A-2, B, C, D, E, F, and G
notes did not receive any liquidation proceeds as the proceeds
were insufficient to fully redeem class A-1, resulting in 100%
losses to the subordinate classes.

Costa Bella is a hybrid static collateralized debt obligation
which closed in December 2006 with a portfolio selected by Pacific
Investment Management Company LLC.  Costa Bella is composed of
96.5% RMBS primarily from the 2005 through 2007 vintages, 1.7%
structured finance CDOs from the 2006 vintage, 1% corporate bonds,
and 0.8% commercial mortgage-backed securities.


CREDIT AND REPACKAGED: S&P Affirms 'B-' Rating on 2006-14 Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its rating on the
spread-based leveraged super-senior notes issued by Credit And
Repackaged Securities Ltd.'s series 2006-14 and removed it from
CreditWatch with negative implications.

The affirmation and CreditWatch removal follow spread tightening
in the credit default swap market.  S&P believes that the spread-
based LSS transaction has sufficient cushions and has a low
probability of breaching its portfolio spread triggers;
consequently, S&P affirmed the rating and removed it from
CreditWatch negative.

      Rating Affirmed And Removed From Creditwatch Negative

              Credit And Repackaged Securities Ltd.
                         Series 2006-14

                                Rating
                                ------
             Class           To          From
             -----           --          ----
             Notes           B-          B-/Watch Neg


CREDIT SUISSE: Moody's Affirms Ratings on Nine 2005-C1 Certs.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of nine classes and
downgraded 12 classes of Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage
Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
2005-C1.  The downgrades are due to higher expected losses for the
pool resulting from increased leverage, increased credit quality
dispersion and anticipated losses from specially serviced loans.
The action is the result of Moody's on-going surveillance of
commercial mortgage backed securities transactions.

As of the May 15, 2009 distribution date, the transaction's
aggregate certificate balance has decreased by 6% to $1.4 billion
from $1.5 billion at securitization.  The Certificates are
collateralized by 163 mortgage loans ranging in size from less
than 1% to 8% of the pool, with the top 10 loans representing 37%
of the pool.  Seventeen loans, representing 9% of the pool, have
defeased and are collateralized by U.S. government securities.

Forty four loans, representing 24% of the pool, are on the master
servicer's watchlist.  The watchlist includes loans which meet
certain portfolio review guidelines established as part of the
Commercial Mortgage Securities Association's monthly reporting
package.  As part of Moody's ongoing monitoring of a transaction,
Moody's reviews the watchlist to assess which loans have material
issues that could impact performance.

The pool has experienced a minimal loss of approximately $62,000
since securitization.  There are currently nine loans,
representing 12% of the pool, in special servicing.  The largest
specially serviced loan is the GGP Retail Portfolio
($112.0 million -- 7.8%), which is secured by four malls owned by
General Growth Properties.  These properties were included in
GGP's April 16, 2009 Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing and the loan was
subsequently transferred to special servicing.  At this point,
Moody's does not anticipate a loss on this loan.  Moody's expects
an aggregate $25.9 million loss (44% loss severity on average)
from the remaining eight specially serviced loans.

Moody's was provided with full and partial-year 2008 operating
results for 51% and 53%, respectively, of the pool.  Moody's
average weighted loan to value ratio for the conduit component,
excluding the eight specially serviced loans with anticipated
losses, is 100% compared to 94% at Moody's prior full review in
May 2007.  In addition to increased leverage, the pool has
experienced increased credit quality dispersion.  Based on Moody's
analysis, 47% of the pool has a LTV ratio in excess of 100%
compared to 34% at last review and 12% of the conduit pool has a
LTV ratio in excess of 120% compared to 2% at last review.

The three largest loans represent 15.3% of the pool.  The largest
loan is the GGP Retail Portfolio Loan ($112.0 million -- 7.8%),
which is secured by four regional malls containing 2.2 million
square feet of GLA, of which 1.8 million is collateral for the
loan.  The properties are located in Wyoming, Idaho, Utah and
Washington.  The in-line space was 83% occupied as of 12/31/2007.
The loan was transferred to special servicing due to the
bankruptcy filing of its sponsor, GGP.  Moody's analysis of this
loan reflects a stressed cash flow to reflect concerns about the
current weak retail environment and the potential impact of the
bankruptcy on property performance.  Moody's LTV is 107% compared
to 91% at last review.

The second largest loan is the Phelps Dodge Tower Loan
($54.5 million -- 3.8%), which is secured by a 409,900 square foot
class A office building located in Phoenix, Arizona.  The property
is subject to a 50-year ground lease with the City of Phoenix.
The property was 97% leased as of March 2009 compared to 95% at
last review.  The largest tenant is Freeport McMoran Cooper & Gold
Inc. (Moody's senior unsecured rating Ba2, stable outlook; 46%
NRA; lease expiration December 2011).  The loan matures in January
2015 and is interest only for its entire term.  Although property
performance has been stable, Moody's analysis reflects a stressed
cash flow due to Moody's concerns regarding the significant lease
expirations prior to loan maturity and the weakening Phoenix
office market.  Moody's LTV is 94% compared to 82% at last review.

The third largest loan is the Bexley Multifamily Portfolio Loan
($53.3 million -- 3.7%), which is secured by two Class A
multifamily properties containing 820 units located in Charlotte,
North Carolina.  Moody's was not provided with recent financial
statements for this property.  The loan matures in November 2009.
Moody's is concerned about this loan due to the weakening
Charlotte multifamily market, the lack of recent financial
information and near-term loan maturity.  Moody's LTV is 119%
compared to 111% at last review.

Moody's rating action is:

  -- Class A-1, $30,703,273, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 5/2/2007

  -- Class A-2, $125,500,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 5/2/2007

  -- Class A-AB, $113,100,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 5/2/2007

  -- Class A-3, $181,606,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 5/2/2007

  -- Class A-4, $674,347,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 5/2/2007

  -- Class A-J, $92,510,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 5/2/2007

  -- Class A-X, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 5/2/2007

  -- Class A-SP, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 5/2/2007

  -- Class B, $43,423,000, affirmed at Aa2; previously affirmed at
     Aa2 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class C, $13,216,000, downgraded to A2 from Aa3; previously
     affirmed at Aa3 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class D, $24,543,000, downgraded to Baa1 from A2; previously
     affirmed at A2 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class E, $18,880,000, downgraded to Baa2 from A3; previously
     affirmed at A3 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class F, $20,767,000, downgraded to Baa3 from Baa1;
     previously affirmed at Baa1 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class G, $15,104,000, downgraded to Ba2 from Baa2; previously
     affirmed at Baa2 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class H, $18,880,000, downgraded to B1 from Baa3; previously
     affirmed at Baa3 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class J, $5,663,000, downgraded to B2 from Ba1; previously
     affirmed at Ba1 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class K, $5,664,000, downgraded to B3 from Ba2; previously
     affirmed at Ba2 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class L, $5,664,000, downgraded to Caa1 from Ba3; previously
     affirmed at Ba3 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class M, $5,664,000, downgraded to Caa2 from B1; previously
     affirmed at B1 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class N, $5,664,000, downgraded to Caa3 from B2; previously
     affirmed at B2 on 5/2/2007

  -- Class O, $3,776,000, downgraded to Caa3 from B3; previously
     affirmed at B3 on 5/2/2007


CREDIT SUISSE: Moody's Reviews Ratings on 2005-C2 Certificates
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed 16 classes of Credit Suisse First
Boston Mortgage Securities Corporation, Commercial Mortgage Pass-
Through Certificates, Series 2005-C2 on review for possible
downgrade as a result of higher expected losses for the pool
associated with loans in special servicing.  Most recently, on
May 26, 2009, the pool's third largest loan, Washington Mutual
Irvine Campus, was transferred to special servicing.  The rating
action is the result of Moody's on-going surveillance of
commercial mortgage backed securities transactions.

As of the May 15, 2009 distribution date, the transaction's
aggregate certificate balance has decreased by approximately 4% to
$1.55 billion from $1.61 billion at securitization.  The
Certificates are collateralized by 168 mortgage loans ranging in
size from less than 1% to 9% of the pool, with the top 10 loans
representing 45% of the pool.

Twenty-nine loans, representing 16% of the pool, are on the master
servicer's watchlist.  The watchlist includes loans which meet
certain portfolio review guidelines established as part of the
Commercial Mortgage Securities Association's monthly reporting
package.  As part of Moody's ongoing monitoring of a transaction,
Moody's reviews the watchlist to assess which loans have material
issues that could impact performance.

Seven loans, representing 12% of the pool, are currently in
special servicing.  The largest loan in special servicing is
Washington Mutual Irvine Campus Loan ($106.0 million -- 6.9%),
which is secured by a 415,000 square foot office complex located
in Irvine, California.  The loan was transferred to special
servicing on May 26, 2009 for imminent default.  Upon acquiring
Washington Mutual, JPMorgan reached an agreement with regulators
to reject the lease on this property.  JPMorgan vacated a portion
of the space in March 2009, leaving the property 40% occupied.  In
February 2010, JPMorgan intends to vacate the remaining space at
the property.  The loan is interest-only for the full term and
matures in December 2011.

Moody's review will focus on the performance of the overall pool
and potential losses from specially serviced loans.

Moody's rating action is:

  -- Class A-MFL, $80,000,000, currently rated Aaa, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Aaa on 7/23/2007

  -- Class A-MFX, $80,508,000, currently rated Aaa, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Aaa on 7/23/2007

  -- Class A-J, $110,350,000, currently rated Aaa, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Aaa on 7/23/2007

  -- Class B, $30,095,000, currently rated Aa2, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Aa2 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class C, $16,051,000, currently rated Aa3, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Aa3 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class D, $28,089,000, currently rated A2, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at A2 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class E, $18,057,000, currently rated A3, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at A3 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class F, $20,064,000, currently rated Baa1, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Baa1 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class G, $16,050,000, currently rated Baa2, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Baa2 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class H, $20,064,000, currently rated Baa3, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Baa3 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class J, $8,025,000, currently rated Ba1, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Ba1 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class K, $8,026,000, currently rated Ba2, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Ba2 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class L, $8,025,000, currently rated Ba3, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Ba3 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class M, $2,007,000, currently rated B1, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at B1 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class N, $6,019,000, currently rated B2, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at B2 on 7/23/2007

  -- Class O, $6,019,000, currently rated B3, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at B3 on 7/23/2007


CSMC MORTGAGE-BACKED: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 37 Tranches
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded 37 tranches from CSMC
Mortgage-Backed Trust Series 2007-2.

The collateral backing the transaction consists primarily of
first-lien, fixed-rate, Alt-A mortgage loans.  The actions are
triggered by rapidly increasing delinquencies, higher severities,
slower prepayments and mounting losses in the underlying
collateral.  Additionally, the continued deterioration of the
housing market has also contributed to the increased loss
expectations for Alt-A pools.  The actions listed below reflect
Moody's updated expected losses on the Alt-A sector announced in a
press release on January 22, 2009, and are part of Moody's on-
going review process.

Moody's final rating actions are based on current ratings, level
of credit enhancement, collateral performance and updated pool-
level loss expectations relative to current level of credit
enhancement.  Moody's took into account credit enhancement
provided by seniority, cross-collateralization, excess spread,
time tranching, and other structural features within the senior
note waterfalls.

Loss estimates are subject to variability and are sensitive to
assumptions used; as a result, realized losses could ultimately
turn out higher or lower than Moody's current expectations.
Moody's will continue to evaluate performance data as it becomes
available and will assess the pattern of potential future defaults
and adjust loss expectations accordingly as necessary.

Complete rating actions are:

Issuer: CSMC Mortgage-Backed Trust Series 2007-2

  -- Cl. 1-A-1, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-2, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-4, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-5, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-6, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-7, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 10/23/2008 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-8, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 10/23/2008 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-9, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-10, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-11, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 10/23/2008 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-12, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-13, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-14, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-15, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-16, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 1-A-17, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-1, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-2, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-3, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 10/23/2008 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-4, Downgraded to A1; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 2-A-5, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-1, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-2, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-3, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-4, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-5, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-6, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-7, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-8, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-9, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-10, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-11, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-13, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-14, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 10/23/2008 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. 3-A-15, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-X, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 10/23/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-P, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/26/2007 Assigned
     Aaa

The ratings on the notes were assigned by evaluating factors
determined to be applicable to the credit profile of the notes,
such as i) the nature, sufficiency, and quality of historical
performance information regarding the asset class as well as for
the transaction sponsor, ii) an analysis of the collateral, iii)
an analysis of the policies, procedures and alignment of interests
of the key parties to the transaction, most notably the originator
and the servicer, iv) an analysis of the transaction's allocation
of collateral cashflow and capital structure, v) an analysis of
the transaction's governance and legal structure, and (vi) a
comparison of these attributes against those of other similar
transactions.


DENALI CAPITAL: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Denali Capital CLO IV, Ltd.:

  -- US$312,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Notes Due 2016,
     Downgraded to Aa3; previously on August 25, 2004 Assigned
     Aaa;

  -- US$22,000,000 Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Interest
     Notes Due 2016, Downgraded to B2; previously on March 18,
     2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$8,000,000 Class D Subordinated Secured Deferrable
     Interest Notes Due 2016, Downgraded to Ca; previously on
     March 18, 2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$7,500,000 Class 1 Composite Securities Due 2016,
     Downgraded to B1; previously on August 25, 2004, Assigned
     Baa3;

  -- US$11,000,000 Class 2 Composite Securities Due 2016,
     Downgraded to Ba3; previously on August 25, 2004, Assigned
     Baa1;

  -- US$1,850,000 Class 3 Composite Securities Due 2016,
     Downgraded to Ca; previously on August 25, 2004, Assigned
     Caa2;

  -- US$3,250,000 Class 4 Composite Securities Due 2016,
     Downgraded to B1; previously on August 25, 2004, Assigned
     Ba2.

In addition, Moody's has confirmed the rating on these notes:

  -- US$26,000,000 Class B Senior Secured Deferrable Interest
     Notes Due 2016, Confirmed at Ba1; previously on March 18,
     2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class C and Class D Overcollateralization Tests.  The weighted
average rating factor has steadily increased over the last year
and it is currently 2990 versus a test level of 2780 as of the
latest trustee report, dated May 11, 2009.  Based on the same
report, defaulted securities total about $28.7 million, accounting
for roughly 7.5% of the collateral balance, and securities rated
Caa1 or lower make up approximately 12% of the underlying
portfolio.

Denali Capital CLO IV, Ltd., issued on August 25, 2004, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


DOW JONES: Moody's Junks Ratings on $325 Mil. Certs. From 'B1'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$325,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.7-2 7.125% Credit-
Linked Trust Certificates issued by Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.7 Trust 2
December 2011.

The rating action is:

Class Description: US$325,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.7-2 7.125%
Credit-Linked Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Caa2
  -- Prior Rating: B1
  -- Prior Rating Date: 11/07/2008

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


DOW JONES: Moody's Junks Rating on $400 Mil. Certs. From 'B3'
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$400,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.7-3 8.000% Credit-
Linked Trust Certificates issued by Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.7 Trust 3
December 2011.

The rating action is:

Class Description: US$400,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.7-3 8.000%
Credit-Linked Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Caa3
  -- Prior Rating: B3
  -- Prior Rating Date: 10/31/2006

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


DOW JONES: Moody's Junks Ratings on $550 Mil. Certs. From 'B3'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$550,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.6-3 8.125% Credit-
Linked Trust Certificates issued by Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.6 Trust 3
June 2011.

The rating action is:

Class Description: US$550,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.6-3 8.125%
Credit-Linked Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Caa3
  -- Prior Rating: B3
  -- Prior Rating Date: 6/28/2006

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


DOW JONES: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $725 Mil. Certs. to 'Caa3'
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$725,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.5-3 8.25% Credit-
Linked Trust Certificates issued by Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.5 Trust 3
December 2010.

The rating action is:

Class Description: US$725,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.5-3 8.25%
Credit-Linked Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Caa3
  -- Prior Rating: Caa2
  -- Prior Rating Date: 11/07/2008

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


DOW JONES: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $1.25 Bil. Certs. to 'Ca'
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$1,250,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.3-3 8% Credit-
Linked Trust Certificates issued by Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.3 Trust 3
December 2009.

The rating action is:

Class Description: US$1,250,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.3-3 8%
Credit-Linked Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Ca
  -- Prior Rating: Caa1
  -- Prior Rating Date: 11/07/2008

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


DOW JONES: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $2.25 Bil. Certs. to 'Caa3'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of US$2,250,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.4-1 8.25% Credit-
Linked Trust Certificates issued by Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.4 Trust 1
June 2010.

The rating action is:

Class Description: US$2,250,000,000 Dow Jones CDX.NA.HY.4-1 8.25%
Credit-Linked Trust Certificates

  -- Current Rating: Caa3
  -- Prior Rating: Caa1
  -- Prior Rating Date: 11/07/2008

The rating of the Certificates is directly linked to the average
credit quality of performing Reference Entities comprising the
Issuer's current underlying portfolio as well as the legal
structure of the transaction.  The rating action is primarily due
to the continued deterioration in the credit quality of the
Reference Entities as well as the Credit Events.


DRYDEN VI: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various 2004 Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded and
left under review for possible downgrade the ratings of these
notes issued by Dryden VI-Leveraged Loan CDO 2004 Inc.:

  -- US$4,000,000 Class B-1 Floating Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes Due 2016, Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgrade; previously on April 16, 2009
     Baa1 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$24,000,000 Class B-2 Fixed Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes Due 2016, Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgrade; previously on April 16, 2009
     Baa1 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$10,000,000 Class Q-2 Securities Due 2016, Downgraded to
     B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade; previously
     on April 16, 2009 Ba2 Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

In addition, Moody's downgraded the ratings of these notes:

  -- US$23,000,000 Class C-1 Floating Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes Due 2016, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on
     April 16, 2009 Ba1 Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$5,000,000 Class C-2 Fixed Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes Due 2016, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on
     April 16, 2009 Ba1 Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$9,000,000 Class Q-1 Securities Due 2016, Downgraded to
     Ba3; previously on April 16, 2009 Baa1 Placed Under Review
     for Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds, second lien loans will be below their
historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in, among
others, a decline in the average credit rating (as measured
through the weighted average rating factor), an increase in the
dollar amount of defaulted securities, an increase in the
proportion of securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and
failure of the Class B and Class C Overcollateralization Ratio
Tests.  The weighted average rating factor has steadily increased
over the last year and it is currently at 2653 versus a test level
of 2335 as of the last trustee report, dated April 20, 2009.
Based on the same report, defaulted securities total about
$57.2 million accounting for roughly 10% of the collateral balance
and securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 9% of the
underlying portfolio.  In addition, interest payments on the Class
C Notes are presently being deferred as a result of the failure of
the Class B Overcollateralization Ratio Test.

Class A-2 Notes, Class B-1 Notes, Class B2 Notes, and Class Q-2
Securities remain under review for possible downgrade as a result
of the additional risk posed to the noteholders due to the action
taken by Moody's on the insurance financial strength rating of
Financial Security Assurance Inc., which acts as guarantor under
the Investment Agreement in the transaction.  On May 20, 2009,
Moody's placed the financial strength rating of Financial Security
Assurance Inc. on review for possible downgrade.

Dryden VI-Leveraged Loan CDO 2004 Inc, issued on May 27, 2004, is
a synthetic collateralized loan obligation referencing primarily a
portfolio of senior secured loans.


FIRST HORIZON: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 71 Tranches
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded 71 tranches and confirmed
12 tranches from 11 First Horizon Jumbo transactions.

The collateral backing these transactions consists primarily of
first-lien, fixed and adjustable-rate, Jumbo mortgage loans.  The
actions are triggered by the quickly deteriorating performance --
marked by rising delinquencies and loss severities, along with
concerns about the continuing drop in housing prices nationwide
and the rising unemployment levels.  The actions listed below
reflect Moody's updated expected losses on the jumbo sector
announced in a press release on March 19, 2009, and are part of
Moody's on-going review process.

Moody's final rating actions are based on current ratings, level
of credit enhancement, collateral performance and updated pool-
level loss expectations relative to current level of credit
enhancement.  Moody's took into account credit enhancement
provided by seniority, cross-collateralization, time tranching,
and other structural features within the senior note waterfalls.

Loss estimates are subject to variability and are sensitive to
assumptions used; as a result, realized losses could ultimately
turn out higher or lower than Moody's current expectations.
Moody's will continue to evaluate performance data as it becomes
available and will assess the pattern of potential future defaults
and adjust loss expectations accordingly as necessary.

First Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-5

  -- Cl. I-A-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-6, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

First Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-7

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-11, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-13, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

First Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006-3

  -- Cl. I-A-4, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-5, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-6, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-7, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-8, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-10, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-11, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-12, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-13, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-14, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-15, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-PO, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-1, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-PO, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

First Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-1

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-2, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-3, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-4, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-5, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-6, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-PO, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

First Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-2

  -- Cl. I-A-3, Downgraded to B3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-6, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

First Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-4

  -- Cl. I-A-10, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-16, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-17, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 3/19/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

First Horizon Mortgage Pass-Thru Trust 2005-1

  -- Cl. I-A-1, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-2, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-3, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-4, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-5, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-6, Downgraded to A3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-8, Downgraded to A2; previously on 5/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-9, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-1, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

First Horizon Mortgage Pass-Thru Trust 2005-2

  -- Cl. I-A-1, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-2, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-3, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-4, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-5, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-6, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa


     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-7, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-PO, Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-1, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-2, Confirmed at Aa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-PO, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. III-A-1, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. III-A-2, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

First Horizon Mortgage Pass-Thru Trust 2005-3

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to A3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-2, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-3, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-4, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-5, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-6, Downgraded to A3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-7, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-8, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-9, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-PO, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

First Horizon Mortgage Pass-Thru Trust 2005-4

  -- Cl. I-A-1, Downgraded to A3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-2, Downgraded to A3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-3, Downgraded to A3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-4, Downgraded to Aa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-5, Downgraded to Aa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-6, Downgraded to A1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-7, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-8, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-9, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. I-A-PO, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-1, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-PO, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

First Horizon Mtge Pass-Through Trust 2005-AR1

  -- Cl. I-A-1, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-1, Downgraded to Aa1; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-2, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-3, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-4, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. II-A-5, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. III-A-1, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. IV-A-1, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 3/19/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

The ratings on the notes were assigned after evaluating factors
determined applicable to the credit profile of the notes, such as:

  i) the nature, sufficiency, and quality of historical
     performance information available for the asset class as well
     as for the transaction sponsor,

ii) collateral analysis,

iii) an analysis of the policies, procedures and alignment of
     interests of the key parties to the transaction, most notably
     the originator and the servicer,

iv) an analysis of the transaction's allocation of collateral
     cashflow and capital structure,

  v) an analysis of the transaction's governance and legal
     structure, and

vi) a comparison of these attributes against those of other
     similar transactions.


FIRST UNION: Moody's Reviews Ratings on 2001-C1 Certificates
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed 12 classes of First Union
National Bank- Bank of America, N.A., Commercial Mortgage Trust,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2001-C1 on
review for possible downgrade due to higher expected losses for
the pool resulting from anticipated losses from loans in special
servicing.  Most recently, on June 2, 2009, the pool's second
largest loan, EmeryTech, which represents 3.6% of the pool, was
transferred to special servicing.  The rating action is the result
of Moody's on-going surveillance of commercial mortgage backed
securities transactions.

As of the May 15, 2009 distribution date, the transaction's
aggregate certificate balance has decreased by approximately 22%
to $1.02 billion from $1.32 billion at securitization.  The
Certificates are collateralized by 155 mortgage loans ranging in
size from less than 1% to 5% of the pool, with the top 10 loans
representing 24% of the pool.

Thirty loans, representing 17% of the pool, are on the master
servicer's watchlist.  The watchlist includes loans which meet
certain portfolio review guidelines established as part of the
Commercial Mortgage Securities Association's monthly reporting
package.  As part of Moody's ongoing monitoring of a transaction,
Moody's reviews the watchlist to assess which loans have material
issues that could impact performance.

Eight loans, representing 9% of the pool, are currently in special
servicing.  The largest loan in special servicing is EmeryTech
($37.0 million -- 3.6%), which is secured by a 224,000 square foot
office building located in Emeryville, California.  The loan was
transferred to special servicing due to imminent default.  The
property was 67% occupied as of March 2009.  Large tenants have
recently vacated the building including Washington Mutual (18%
NRA) and LV Sensor (6%).  The Borrower has indicated that he has a
potential tenant for some of Washington Mutual's former space,
however, the prospective tenant would not move in until next year.
The loan is amortizing on a 30 year schedule and matures in
December 2010.

Moody's review will focus on the performance of the overall pool
and potential losses from specially serviced loans.

Moody's rating action is:

  -- Class C, $26,166,000, currently rated Aaa, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Aaa on 8/13/2007

  -- Class D, $26,165,000, currently rated Aa1, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously upgraded to Aa1 from Aa2 on
     8/13/2007

  -- Class E, $16,354,000, currently rated Aa3, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously upgraded to Aa3 from A1 on
     8/13/2007

  -- Class F, $13,082,000, currently rated A1, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously upgraded to A1 from A3 on
     8/13/2007

  -- Class G, $26,166,000, currently rated Baa1, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously upgraded to Baa1 from Baa2 on
     8/13/2007

  -- Class H, $16,354,000, currently rated Baa3, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Baa3 on 8/13/2007

  -- Class J, $19,624,000, currently rated Ba1, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Ba1 on 8/13/2007

  -- Class L, $13,083,000, currently rated Ba3, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Ba3 on 8/13/2007

  -- Class M, $6,541,000, currently rated B1, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at B1 on 8/13/2007

  -- Class N, $9,812,000, currently rated B3, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at B3 on 8/13/2007

  -- Class O, $13,083,000, currently rated Caa3, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Caa3 on 8/13/2007

  -- Class P, $4,284,460, currently rated Ca, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously affirmed at Ca on 8/13/2007


FIRST UNION-LEHMAN: Moody's Affirms Ratings on 10 1998-C2 Certs.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of ten classes and
downgraded two class of First Union-Lehman Brothers-Bank of
America Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-
Through Certificates, Series 1998-C2.  The downgrades are due to
higher expected losses for the pool resulting from anticipated
losses from specially serviced loans.  The rating action is the
result of Moody's on-going surveillance of commercial mortgage
backed securities transactions.

As of the May 18, 2009 distribution date, the transaction's
aggregate certificate balance has decreased by approximately 78%
to $745.0 million from $3.4 billion at securitization.  The
Certificates are collateralized by 180 loans ranging in size from
less than 1% to 13% of the pool, with the top 10 loans
representing 41% of the pool.  The pool includes two loans with
investment grade underlying ratings, representing 23% of the pool,
and a credit tenant lease component, representing 18% of the pool.
Twenty-three loans, representing 13% of the pool, have defeased
and are collateralized with U.S. Government securities.

Nineteen loans, representing 15% of the pool, are on the master
servicer's watchlist.  The watchlist includes loans which meet
certain portfolio review guidelines established as part of the
Commercial Mortgage Securities Association's monthly reporting
package.  As part of Moody's ongoing monitoring of a transaction,
Moody's reviews the watchlist to assess which loans have material
issues that could impact performance.

Thirty-eight loans have been liquidated from the pool, resulting
in an aggregate $43.3 million realized loss.  Currently there are
twelve loans, representing 5% of the pool, in special servicing.
Moody's estimates an aggregate loss of $19.3 million (51% loss
severity on average) for the specially serviced loans.

Moody's was provided with full year 2008 operating results for 87%
of the pool, excluding the CTL and defeased loans.  Moody's
weighted average loan to value ratio for the conduit component is
75%, essentially the same as at Moody's prior review in July 2008.

The largest loan with an underlying rating is the Broadmoor Austin
Loan ($96.3 million -- 12.9%), which is secured by an eight-
building, 1.2 million square foot office complex located in
Austin, Texas.  The property is 100.0% leased to International
Business Machines Corporation (Moody's senior unsecured rating A1
-- stable outlook) through March 2011.  IBM has two five-year
lease extensions.  Although property performance has been stable,
Moody's is concerned about the 100% lease expiration prior to loan
maturity.  The loan has an Anticipated Repayment Date in April
2011 with a final maturity in April 2023.  Moody's valuation of
this loan assumes that IBM will extend their lease but at a market
rent.  IBM's current rent is approximately 15% above market.
Moody's current underlying rating is Baa1 compared to A2 at last
review.

The second largest loan with an underlying rating is the IBM
Corporate Office Complex Loan ($71.3 million -- 9.6%), which is
secured by a five-building, 1.1 million square foot office complex
located in Somers, New York.  The property is 100.0% leased to IBM
under a triple net lease that is coterminous with the loan
maturity in October 2013.  The loan fully amortizes during the
term and has amortized by approximately 15% since last review.
Property performance has been stable.  Moody's current underlying
rating is Aa2 compared to Aa3 at last review.

The top three non-defeased conduit loans represent 10.8% pool.
The largest conduit loan is the First Union Plaza Loan
($56.6 million -- 7.6%), which is secured by a 612,000 square foot
office building located in Atlanta, Georgia.  As of December 2008,
the property was 74% occupied, essentially the same as at last
review.  Major tenants include Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan, LP
(41.0% NRA; lease expiration April 2015) and Heery International
(13.0%; lease expiration September 2017).  The loan is on the
servicer's watchlist due to high vacancy.  Performance has
declined since last review because of decreased rental revenues.
Moody's LTV is 97% compared to 86% at last review.

The second largest conduit loan is the Burke Center Loan
($14.0 million -- 1.9%), which is secured by a 213,000 square foot
retail center located in Burke (Fairfax County), Virginia.  The
center was 100% occupied as of December 2008.  Major tenants
include Kohl's, Safeway and CVS.  Moody's LTV is 44%, essentially
the same as at last review.

The third largest conduit loan is the Clearwater Crossing Shopping
Center Loan ($9.9 million -- 1.3%), which is secured by a 124,700
square foot retail center located in Indianapolis, Indiana.  The
center was 93% occupied as of December 2008.  Major tenants
include Babies 'R' Us, Barnes & Noble and Office Max.  Performance
has declined due to lower rent and higher expenses.  Moody's LTV
is 88% compared to 72% at last review.

The CTL component includes 58 loans secured by properties leased
under bondable leases.  The largest exposures are Brinker
International, Inc. (38% of CTL component; Moody's senior
unsecured rating Ba2 -- stable outlook), Rite Aid (14%; Moody's LT
senior unsecured rating Caa3 -- negative outlook) and Walgreen Co.
(12%; Moody's senior unsecured rating A2 -- stable outlook).

Moody's rating action is:

  -- Class IO, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 7/17/2008

  -- Class B, $4,437,945, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 7/17/2008

  -- Class C, $ 170,402,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 7/17/2008

  -- Class D, $204,483,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 7/17/2008

  -- Class E, $68,161,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 7/17/2008

  -- Class F, $51,121,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 7/17/2008

  -- Class G, $102,241,582, affirmed at Aa3; previously upgraded
     to Aa3 from Baa1 on 7/17/2008

  -- Class H, $17,040,241, affirmed at Baa1; previously upgraded
     to Baa1 from Baa3 on 7/17/2008

  -- Class J, $34,080,482, affirmed at B1; previously affirmed at
     B1 on 7/17/2008

  -- Class K, $51,120,723, downgraded to Caa2 from Caa1;
     previously affirmed at Caa1 on 7/17/2008

  -- Class L, $34,080,482, downgraded to Ca from Caa3; previously
     affirmed at Caa3 on 7/17/2008

  -- Class M, $7,822,779, affirmed at C; previously affirmed at C
     on 7/17/2008


FLAGSHIP CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded these
notes issued by Flagship CLO III:

  -- US$234,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Funded
     Notes due 2016, Downgraded to A1; previously on August 31,
     2004 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$35,400,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate
     Revolving Notes due 2016, Downgraded to A1; previously on
     August 31, 2004 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$29,400,000 Class B Second Priority Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes due 2016, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on March
     17, 2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$13,000,000 Class C Third Priority Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes due 2016, Downgraded to B3; previously on March
     17, 2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$10,600,000 Class D Fourth Priority Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes due 2016, Downgraded to Ca; previously on March
     17, 2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans and senior unsecured bonds will be below their
historical averages, consistent with Moody's research (see Moody's
Special Comment titled "Strong Loan Issuance in Recent Years
Signals Low Recovery Prospects for Loans and Bonds of Defaulted
U.S. Corporate Issuers," dated June 2008).

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class B, Class C, and Class D Overcollateralization Tests.  The
weighted average rating factor has steadily increased over the
last year and it is currently at 2914 versus a test level of 2746
as of the last trustee report, dated May 5, 2009.  Based on the
same report, defaulted securities total about $15.39 million,
accounting for roughly 4.6% of the collateral balance, and
securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 15% of the
underlying portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments on the
Class D Notes are presently being deferred as a result of the
failure of the Class B and Class C Overcollateralization Tests.

Flagship CLO III, issued in August 2004, is a collateralized loan
obligations backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


FRANKLIN CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Franklin CLO VI, Ltd.:

  -- US$272,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2019, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on July 26, 2007
     Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$38,000,000 Class B Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2019, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$18,000,000 Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on March
     13, 2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$15,000,000 Class D Senior Secured Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on March
     13, 2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$11,500,000 Class E Senior Secured Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to C; previously on March 13,
     2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in, among
others, a decline in the average credit rating (as measured
through the weighted average rating factor), an increase in the
dollar amount of defaulted securities, an increase in the
proportion of securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and
failure of Class C, D, E Overcollateralization Tests.  The
weighted average rating factor has steadily increased over the
last year and it is currently at 2780 versus a test level of 2683
as of the last trustee report, dated May 26, 2009. Based on the
same report, defaulted securities total about $19.7 million
accounting for roughly 5.5% of the collateral balance and
securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 11% of the
underlying portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments on the
Class D and Class E Notes are presently being deferred as a result
of the failure of the Class C and Class D Overcollateralization
Tests.

Franklin CLO VI, Ltd., issued in July 2007, is a collateralized
loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.

Moody's Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations
(December 31, 2008).

In addition to the quantitative factors that are explicitly
modeled, qualitative factors are part of the rating committee
considerations.  These qualitative factors include the structural
protections in each transaction, the recent deal performance in
the current market environment, the legal environment, specific
documentation features, the collateral manager's track record, and
the potential for selection bias in the portfolio.  All
information available to rating committees, including
macroeconomic forecasts, input from other Moody's analytical
groups, market factors, and judgments regarding the nature and
severity of credit stress on the transactions, may influence the
final rating decision.


GALAXY IV: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Galaxy IV CLO, Ltd.:

  -- $235,000,000 Class A-1 Senior Term Notes Due 2017, Downgraded
     to Aa3; previously on March 24, 2005 Assigned Aaa;

  -- $65,000,000 Class A-2 Senior Delayed Draw Notes Due 2017,
     Downgraded to Aa3; previously on March 24, 2005 Assigned Aaa;

  -- $21,000,000 Class B Senior Floating Rate Notes Due 2017,
     Downgraded to A3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- $25,000,000 Class C Deferrable Mezzanine Notes Due 2017,
     Downgraded to Ba2; previously on March 18, 2009 Downgraded to
     Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- $14,500,000 Class D Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2017, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on March 18, 2009
     Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- $5,500,000 Class D Deferrable Mezzanine Fixed Rate Notes Due
     2017, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on March 18, 2009
     Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- $8,000,000 Class Z Combination Notes, Downgraded to B2;
     previously on March 4, 2009 Baa3 Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.  Moody's has also applied
resecuritization stress factors to default probability assumptions
for structured finance asset collateral as described in the press
release titled "Moody's updates its key assumptions for rating
structured finance CDOs," published on December 11, 2008.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Mezzanine Overcollateralization Test, Maximum Average Rating
Factor Test, and Moody's Rating of Caa1 or Caa2 or S&P Rating of
CCC+ or CCC Portfolio Profile Test.  The weighted average rating
factor has steadily increased over the last year and it is
currently at 3134 versus a test level of 2655 as of the last
trustee report, dated May 7, 2009.  Based on the same report,
defaulted securities total about $19.24 million, accounting for
roughly 4.9% of the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1
or lower make up approximately 9.6% of the underlying portfolio.

Galaxy IV CLO, Ltd., issued on March 24, 2005, is a collateralized
loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


GENERAL AMERICAN: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Certificates
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded
certificates issued by General American Railcar Corporation 1997-
1, 1998-1 and 1999-1 pass through trusts.  The certificates are
backed by cash generated from pools of leases on railcars.

The complete rating actions are:

Issuer: General American Railcar Corporation 1997-1 Pass Through
Trust

  -- $69,806,186 Pass Through Certificates, Series 1997-1,
     downgraded to Ba3 from A3; previously on February 13, 2009,
     A3, Placed under Review for Possible Downgrade

Issuer: General American Railcar Corporation 1998-1 Pass Through
Trust

  -- $97,566,965 Pass Through Certificates, Series 1998-1,
     downgraded to Ba2 from A2; previously on February 13, 2009,
     A2, Placed under Review for Possible Downgrade

Issuer: General American Railcar Corporation 1999-1 Pass Through
Trust

  -- $67,125,744 Pass Through Certificates, Series 1999-1,
     downgraded to Ba3 from A1; previously on February 13, 2009,
     A1, Placed under Review for Possible Downgrade

The rating actions are based on the analysis of the adequacy of
cash generated from the railcar leases net of operating expenses
to service the debt due to the bondholders.  These deals were
first downgraded in 2004 due to continuous downward pressure on
the lease rates as well as increased operating expenses.  Since
2004 the expenses have continued to grow even though the revenues
have been relatively stable.  The increased expenses have resulted
in less than expected net cash flow available to pay down bonds.

Specifically, the historical coverage ratio (defined as cash
generated from the leases net of operating expenses for the last
six months divided by lessee rent due in the last six months) is
less than 1x for all three deals.  As a result, GARC 1997-1 has
not been able to retire principal according to its scheduled
amortization schedule and there is no cash available in the cash
trap account to cover the shortfalls in scheduled principal
payments.  The other two GARC deals, 1998-1 and 1999-1, are
currently drawing amounts from their respective cash trap accounts
to make scheduled principal payments.

Moody's has developed a monitoring cash flow model for the
transactions.  Monte Carlo simulation was performed using
statistical distributions for some of the key variables such as
the lease rates, maintenance costs and utilization rate.  Each of
the variables were randomized and boundaries established to
capture a range of likely outcomes by stressing GARC's historical
experience.  The simulated cash flows were used to make all
required payments per the priority of payments, including interest
and principal payments due on the certificates.  A resulting loss
of yield to investors, if any, was calculated.  The yield
reduction as well as the probability of default of the
certificates was used to determine the ratings.


GENESIS CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 2007-1 Notes
-------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Genesis CLO 2007-1, Ltd.:

  -- US$1,570,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate
     Notes, Due 2014, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on March 4,
     2009 Aaa Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$110,000,000 Class B Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes,
     Due 2014, Downgraded to A3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

In addition, Moody's has confirmed the ratings on these notes:

  -- US$70,000,000 Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes, Due 2014, Confirmed at Ba1; previously on March
     23, 2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$50,000,000 Class D Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
     Notes, Due 2014, Confirmed at B1; previously on March 23,
     2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$40,000,000 Class E Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
     Notes, Due 2014, Confirmed at Caa3; previously on March 23,
     2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," the application
of certain stresses with respect to the default probabilities
associated with certain Moody's credit estimates, and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of Class
C, D, and E Overcollateralization Tests.  The weighted average
rating factor has steadily increased over the last year and it is
currently at 3,604 versus a closing date level of 2,400 as of the
last trustee report, dated June 1, 2009.  Based on the same
report, defaulted securities total about $138.3 million,
accounting for roughly 8% of the collateral balance, and
securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 21.7% of the
underlying portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments on the
Class D and E Notes are presently being deferred as a result of
the failure of the Class C and D Overcollateralization Tests.

Genesis CLO 2007-1, Ltd., issued in October 2007, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.

In addition to the quantitative factors that are explicitly
modeled, qualitative factors are part of the rating committee
considerations.  These qualitative factors include the structural
protections in each transaction, the recent deal performance in
the current market environment, the legal environment, specific
documentation features, the collateral manager's track record, and
the potential for selection bias in the portfolio.  All
information available to rating committees, including
macroeconomic forecasts, input from other Moody's analytical
groups, market factors, and judgments regarding the nature and
severity of credit stress on the transactions, may influence the
final rating decision.


HALCYON LOAN: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Halcyon Loan Investors CLO II,
Ltd.:

  -- US$270,500,000 Class A-1-S Senior Secured Floating Rate
     Notes due 2021, Downgraded to A2; previously on April 17,
     2007 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$30,250,000 Class A-1-J Senior Secured Floating Rate
     Notes due 2021, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on March 4,
     2009 Aa1 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$23,000,000 Class A-2 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
     due 2021, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$18,500,000 Class B Senior Secured Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes due 2021, Downgraded to B3; previously on March
     17, 2009, Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$21,750,000 Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes due 2021, Downgraded to Ca; previously on March
     17, 2009, Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$15,500,000 Class D Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
     Notes due 2021, Downgraded to C; previously on March 17,
     2009, Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of Class
A, B, C, and D Overcollateralization Ratio Tests.  The weighted
average rating factor has steadily increased over the last year
and it is currently at 3150 versus a test level of 2656 as of the
last trustee report, dated May 13, 2009.  Based on the same
report, defaulted securities total about 24.1 million, accounting
for roughly 6.0% of the collateral balance, and securities rated
Caa1 or lower make up approximately 18.5% of the underlying
portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments on the Class B Notes,
Class C Notes and Class D Notes are presently being deferred as a
result of the failure of the Class A, B, and C
Overcollateralization Ratio Tests.

Halcyon Loan Investors CLO II, Ltd., issued in April 2007, is a
collateralized loan obligation, backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.

In addition to the quantitative factors that are explicitly
modeled, qualitative factors are part of the rating committee
considerations.  These qualitative factors include the structural
protections in each transaction, the recent deal performance in
the current market environment, the legal environment, specific
documentation features, the collateral manager's track record, and
the potential for selection bias in the portfolio.  All
information available to rating committees, including
macroeconomic forecasts, input from other Moody's analytical
groups, market factors, and judgments regarding the nature and
severity of credit stress on the transactions, may influence the
final rating decision.


HEWETT ISLAND: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Hewett's Island CLO III, Ltd.:

  -- US$321,500,000 Class A-1 Senior Secured Notes due August
     2017, Downgraded to A3; previously on August 19, 2005
     Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$14,800,000 Class A-2 Senior Secured Notes Due August
     2017, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$12,700,000 Class B-1 Deferrable Amortizing Senior
     Secured Notes Due August 2017, Downgraded to Ba3; previously
     on March 18, 2009, Downgraded to Baa3 and Placed Under Review
     for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$14,800,000 Class B-2 Deferrable Senior Secured Notes
     Due August 2017, Downgraded to B3; previously on March 18,
     2009, Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$14,800,000 Class C Deferrable Senior Secured Notes Due
     August 2017, Downgraded to Ca; previously on March 18, 2009,
     Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$14,800,000 Class D Deferrable Subordinated Secured
     Notes Due August 2017, Downgraded to C; previously on March
     18, 2009, Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research (see
Moody's Special Comment titled "Strong Loan Issuance in Recent
Years Signals Low Recovery Prospects for Loans and Bonds of
Defaulted U.S. Corporate Issuers," dated June 2008).

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
overcollateralization tests.  The weighted average rating factor
has increased over the last year and is currently 2406 versus a
test level of 2260 as of the latest trustee report, dated May 1,
2009.  Based on the same report, defaulted securities total about
$39.7 million, accounting for roughly 10% of the collateral
balance, and securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately
12% of the underlying portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments
on the Class B-1 Notes, Class B-2 Notes, Class C Notes, and Class
D Notes are presently being deferred as a result of the failure of
the overcollateralization tests.

Hewett's Island CLO III, Ltd., issued in August, 2005, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


HUDSON CANYON: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Two Classes of Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of two classes of notes issued by Hudson Canyon Funding
II, Ltd.:

  -- US$291,000,000 Class A-1 First Priority Senior Secured
     Floating Rate Notes Due October 27, 2020, Downgraded to Aa1;
     previously on May 8, 2008 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$10,000,000 Class A-2 Second Priority Senior Secured
     Floating Rate Notes Due October 27, 2020, Downgraded to A1;
     previously on March 4, 2009 Aaa Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

Additionally, Moody's has confirmed the ratings of these notes:

  -- US$46,000,000 Class B Third Priority Mezzanine Secured
     Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due October 27, 2020,
     Confirmed at Ba3; previously on March 20, 2009 Downgraded to
     Ba3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$5,000,000 Class C Fourth Priority Mezzanine Secured
     Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due October 27, 2020,
     Confirmed at B3; previously on March 20, 2009 Downgraded to
     B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured by the weighted
average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount of
defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of securities
from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the Class B and
Class C overcollateralization tests.  The weighted average rating
factor has steadily increased over the last year and is currently
2851 versus a test level of 2712 as of the latest trustee report,
dated 5/15/09.  Based on the same report, defaulted securities
total about $43 million, accounting for roughly 10.5% of the
collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1 or lower make up
approximately 8% of the underlying portfolio.

Hudson Canyon Funding II, Ltd., issued in April of 2008, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


IMC HOME: Moody's Cuts Underlying Rating on 1998-7 Notes to 'Ba1'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the rating of one
security from IMC Home Equity Loan Trust 1998-7.  This action is
part of an ongoing review of subprime RMBS transactions.

The rating action is the result of an analysis of credit
enhancement relative to updated collateral loss projections.  The
revised loss projections generally result from deterioration in
collateral performance in recent months.  Additionally, most
affected transactions have, at some point, passed performance
triggers and released portions of credit enhancement.

Moody's approach to analyzing seasoned subprime pools (i.e. prior
to 2H 2005) takes into account the annualized loss rate from last
12 months and the projected loss rate over next 12 months, and
then translates these measures into lifetime losses based on a
deal's expected remaining life.  Recent Losses are calculated by
assessing cumulative losses incurred over the past 12-months as a
percentage of the average pool factor in the last year.  For
Pipeline Losses, Moody's uses an annualized roll rate of 15%, 30%,
65% and 90% for loans that are delinquent 60-days, 90+ days, are
in foreclosure, and REO respectively.  Moody's then applies deal-
specific severity assumptions, in this case 70%.  The results of
these two calculations -- Recent Losses and Pipeline Losses -- are
weighted to arrive at the lifetime cumulative loss projection.

The complete rating actions:

Issuer: IMC Home Equity Loan Trust 1998-7

  -- Class A, Current Rating: Aa3, on review for possible
     downgrade

  -- Current Underlying Rating: Downgraded to Ba1; previously on
     6/18/2008 Published at Baa1

  -- Financial Guarantor: Financial Security Assurance Inc. (Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade on 5/20/2009)


IMC HOME: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 1998-7 Security to 'Ba1'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the rating of one
security from IMC Home Equity Loan Trust 1998-7.  This action is
part of an ongoing review of subprime RMBS transactions.

The rating action is the result of an analysis of credit
enhancement relative to updated collateral loss projections.  The
revised loss projections generally result from deterioration in
collateral performance in recent months.  Additionally, most
affected transactions have, at some point, passed performance
triggers and released portions of credit enhancement.

Moody's approach to analyzing seasoned subprime pools (i.e. prior
to 2H 2005) takes into account the annualized loss rate from last
12 months and the projected loss rate over next 12 months, and
then translates these measures into lifetime losses based on a
deal's expected remaining life.  Recent Losses are calculated by
assessing cumulative losses incurred over the past 12-months as a
percentage of the average pool factor in the last year.  For
Pipeline Losses, Moody's uses an annualized roll rate of 15%, 30%,
65% and 90% for loans that are delinquent 60-days, 90+ days, are
in foreclosure, and REO respectively.  Moody's then applies deal-
specific severity assumptions, in this case 70%.  The results of
these two calculations -- Recent Losses and Pipeline Losses -- are
weighted to arrive at the lifetime cumulative loss projection.

The complete rating actions follow:

Issuer: IMC Home Equity Loan Trust 1998-7

  -- Class A, Current Rating: Aa3, on review for possible
     downgrade

  -- Current Underlying Rating: Downgraded to Ba1; previously on
     6/18/2008 Published at Baa1

  -- Financial Guarantor: Financial Security Assurance Inc. (Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade on 5/20/2009)


IMPAC SECURED: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Class 1-A2-A Certs.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded Class 1-A2-A from Impac
Secured Assets Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2006-2.

The Rating action is:

Issuer: Impac Secured Assets Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2006-2

  -- Cl. 1-A2-A, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 4/24/2008
     Downgraded to A2

The collateral backing the transaction consists primarily of
first-lien, fixed and adjustable-rate, Alt-A mortgage loans.  The
downgrade is driven by the complete erosion of the
overcollateralization and junior bonds, leaving the senior bonds
exposed to future losses.  The current tranche factor for the
downgraded bond is 2.48%.  The tranche was benefiting from a
sequential pay structure which allowed for rapid amortization.
However, principal distribution will now be paid to all the Class
1-A certificates pro rata based on the certificate principal
balance, and losses will be allocated pro rata as well.

The rating on the note was assigned by evaluating factors
determined to be applicable to the credit profile of the notes,
such as i) the nature, sufficiency, and quality of historical
performance information regarding the asset class as well as for
the transaction sponsor, ii) an analysis of the collateral, iii)
an analysis of the policies, procedures and alignment of interests
of the key parties to the transaction, most notably the originator
and the servicer, iv) an analysis of the transaction's allocation
of collateral cashflow and capital structure, v) an analysis of
the transaction's governance and legal structure, and (vi) a
comparison of these attributes against those of other similar
transactions.


INDYMAC HOME: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 2007-2 Notes
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the ratings of the Notes
issued in IndyMac Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-2 transaction.
Underlying securities' collateral consists primarily of second
lien home equity lines of credit.

The ratings on the securities were monitored by evaluating factors
Moody's determined to be essential in the analysis of securities
backed by such loans.  The salient factors include; i) the nature,
sufficiency, and quality of historical loan performance
information, ii) the collateral composition and pool credit
performance including loan delinquency and loss data, iii) the
transaction's capital structure and related allocations of
collateral cash flows and losses, and iv) a comparison of current
credit enhancement levels to updated Moody's pool loss projections
based on present collateral credit performance.

The securities are guaranteed by the financial guarantors
identified below.  The underlying ratings generally reflect the
intrinsic credit quality of the securities in the absence of the
guarantee.  The current ratings on the below -- noted securities
are consistent with Moody's practice of rating such insured
securities at the higher of the guarantor's insurance financial
strength rating and the underlying or intrinsic rating.

When analyzing underlying ratings for CES and HELOC transactions,
Moody's projects cumulative losses for each deal based on a
collateral analysis of the deal's Constant Prepayment Rate and
Constant Default Rate.

CPR is based on the average of the last six months 1-month CPR.

There are two approaches for determining pool CDR. The first
approach calculates CDR based on pool loan losses from the
previous twelve months, i.e. recent losses.  A second approach is
based on pipeline losses -- losses derived from days-aged
delinquencies and Moody's assumptions for default based on days
delinquent, in foreclosure, or liquidation, and the severity of
loss given default.  Moody's assumes 100% severity for second
liens, including both CES and HELOCs.  After the CDR is calculated
using the two methods, the effective CDR for loss projection
purposes is determined by using a weighted average of the CDRs as
determined by the recent loss and pipeline loss approaches -- with
weightings determined on a transaction by transaction basis.
Moody's assumes that the CDR will not decline for the next three
years and will decline subsequently for the life of the deal under
a schedule, typically reducing by 50% in year 4 and remaining
constant thereafter.

Based on calculated CPR and CDR, Moody's calculates projected
deal-specific cumulative losses and the weighted average life of
the deal.  The credit enhancement calculation can also include
credit for excess spread, i.e the aggregate, positive difference
in the weighted average loan coupon and the all-inclusive
securities' interest and deal fees, including servicing.  Excess
spread benefit is calculated by multiplying the stressed
annualized excess spread by the weighted average life of the deal.

Aggregate credit enhancement which combines subordination benefit
(including overcollateralization and/or reserve accounts) and
excess spread benefit is compared with projected cumulative losses
for the deal to derive coverage multiples and associated ratings
by deal tranche.  Moody's will analyze tranche coverage multiples
after consideration of timing of tranche repayment and allocation
of losses (if any).

Complete rating actions are:

Issuer: IndyMac Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-2

  -- Notes, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 4/13/2009 Downgraded
     to Baa2 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Financial Guarantor: Ambac Assurance Corporation (Currently
     Ba3)


GENESIS CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various 2007-2 Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Genesis CLO 2007-2 Ltd.:

  -- US$1,236,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate
     Notes, Due 2016, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on March 23,
     2009 Aaa Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$65,000,000 Class B Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes,
     Due 2016, Downgraded to A3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2
     Place Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$48,000,000 Class F Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
     Notes, Due 2016, Downgraded to C; previously on March 23,
     2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Place Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

In addition, Moody's has confirmed the ratings on these notes:

  -- US$70,000,000 Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes, Due 2016, Confirmed at Ba1; previously on March
     23, 2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$55,000,000 Class D Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
     Notes, Due 2016, Confirmed at B3; previously on March 23,
     2009 Downgraded to B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$46,000,000 Class E Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
     Notes, Due 2016, Confirmed at Caa3; previously on March 23,
     2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," the application
of certain stresses with respect to the default probabilities
associated with certain Moody's credit estimates, and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research (see
Moody's Special Comment titled "Strong Loan Issuance in Recent
Years Signals Low Recovery Prospects for Loans and Bonds of
Defaulted U.S. Corporate Issuers," dated June 2008).

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of Class
C, D, E and F Overcollateralization Tests.  The weighted average
rating factor has steadily increased over the last year and it is
currently at 3,726 versus a closing date level of 2,690 as of the
last trustee report, dated June 1, 2009.  Based on the same
report, defaulted securities total about $95.8 million, accounting
for roughly 6.7% of the collateral balance, and securities rated
Caa1 or lower make up approximately 19.3% of the underlying
portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments on the Class C, D, E
and F Notes are presently being deferred as a result of the
failure of the Class A/B, C, D, and E Overcollateralization Tests.

Genesis CLO 2007-2 Ltd., issued in December 2007, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.

Moody's Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations
(December 31, 2008).

In addition to the quantitative factors that are explicitly
modeled, qualitative factors are part of the rating committee
considerations.  These qualitative factors include the structural
protections in each transaction, the recent deal performance in
the current market environment, the legal environment, specific
documentation features, the collateral manager's track record, and
the potential for selection bias in the portfolio.  All
information available to rating committees, including
macroeconomic forecasts, input from other Moody's analytical
groups, market factors, and judgments regarding the nature and
severity of credit stress on the transactions, may influence the
final rating decision.


JFK MEDICAL: Moody's Withdraws 'Ba3' Rating on Outstanding Bonds
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service will withdraw the Ba3 rating assigned to
JFK Medical Center/Hartwyck at Oak Tree (NJ) outstanding bonds
upon the refunding and consequently, the defeasance, of the
outstanding bonds by debt to be issued through the New Jersey
Hospital Asset Transformation Program.  The refunding is expected
to occur on June 18, 2009.  The bonds are payable solely from
anticipated contract payments to be made by the State of New
Jersey from its general fund.  Moody's has assigned an A1 to the
Contract Bonds, which reflects the need for annual legislative
appropriation of the contract payments, as well as the state's
credit quality (general obligation bond rating of Aa3).  The
outlook is stable.

The bonds are the third issuance under the state's Hospital Asset
Transformation Program, which was established to assist non-profit
hospitals.  The program was devised after the New Jersey Advisory
Commission on Hospitals, in 1999, recommended closures to address
excess hospital capacity.  Enabling legislation was passed in 2000
in order to facilitate such actions.  Proceeds of bonds issued by
the authority under this program are used to defease the debt of
non-profit hospitals in connection with mergers and closures amid
a statewide consolidation of acute-care providers and to provide
capital for the enhancement and transition of acute care services
to the acquirer entity.

Moody's analysis is based on Solaris Health System, parent
organization of JFK Medical Center/Hartwyck at Oak Tree and
Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center.  Proceeds of the 2009A State
Contract Bonds will refinance the outstanding bonds of MRMC and
JFK.  MRMC was closed in August 2008; the Series 2009A bonds will
also provide new money debt for capital improvements at JFK to
accommodate the additional patient volume at JFK that had
previously been treated at MRMC.

For additional information on the HAPT program, please see Moody's
credit report dated June 9, 2009.

Rated Debt To Be Defeased (debt outstanding as of December 31,
2008):

  -- $11.72 million outstanding, Series 1993, FGIC insured, JFK
     Obligated Group issue

  -- $20.615 million outstanding, Series 1995, FGIC insured, JFK
     Obligated Group issue

  -- $41.565 million outstanding, Series 1998, MBIA insured, JFK
     Obligated Group issue

  -- $17.275 million outstanding, Series 2000, Ambac insured,
     Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center issue, annual debt service
     guaranteed by Solaris

                         Non-Rated Debt

  -- $15.2 million outstanding, Series 2003 COMP pooled financing,
     Wachovia LOC, JFK Medical Center

  -- $17.935 million outstanding, Series 2005 COMP pooled
     financing, Wachovia LOC, JFK Medical Center

  -- $11.861 million outstanding, Series 2001, Whispering Knoll
     and Hartwyck West, Commerce Bank LOC

The last rating action was on October 10, 2008, when the Watchlist
was extended for the Ba3 rating of JFK Medical Center/Hartwyk at
Oak Tree and the Watchlist directional was changed from uncertain
to downgrade.


JP MORGAN: Moody's Affirms Ratings on 14 2005-CIBC11 Notes
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of 14 classes and
downgraded nine classes of J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-
CIBC11 due to anticipated losses from specially serviced loans,
increased credit quality dispersion and concerns about loans
approaching maturity.  Three loans, representing 10.4% of the
pool, mature within the next twelve months.  Two of these loans,
representing 9.6% of the pool, have a Moody's stressed debt
service coverage ratio less than 1.0x.  The action is the result
of Moody's on-going surveillance of commercial mortgaged-back
securities transactions.

As of the May 16, 2009 distribution date, the transaction's
aggregate principle balance has decreased by approximately 4% to
$1.72 billion from $1.80 billion at securitization.  The
Certificates are collateralized by 143 loans, ranging in size from
less than 1% to 9% of the pool, with the top 10 loans representing
46% of the pool.  At securitization the Memorial Office Portfolio
Loan ($75.1 million -- 4.4%) had an investment grade underlying
rating.  The loan no longer has an underlying rating because of a
decline in performance and the loan is now analyzed as part of the
conduit pool.

Thirty one loans, representing 8% of the pool, are on the master
servicer's watch-list.  The master servicer's watch-list includes
loans which meet certain portfolio review guidelines established
as part of the Commercial Mortgage Securities Association's
monthly reporting package.  As part of Moody's ongoing monitoring
of a transaction, Moody's reviews the watch-list to assess which
loans have material issues that could impact performance.  Not all
loans on the watch-list are delinquent or have significant issues.

One loan has been liquidated from the pool since securitization,
resulting in a $1.1 million realized loss.  Currently there are
seven loans, representing 3% of the pool, in special servicing.
Moody's is estimating an aggregate $15.5 million loss from these
specially serviced loans (44% loss severity on average).

Moody's was provided with year-end 2008 operating results for 80%
of the pool.  Moody's weighted average loan to value ratio for the
conduit component is 98%, compared to 97% at Moody's prior review
in May 2007.  Although the pool's overall leverage has been
relatively stable, the pool has experienced increased credit
quality dispersion since last review.  Based on Moody's analysis,
approximately 45% of the pool has a Moody's LTV ratio in excess of
100% compared to 42% at last review and 7% of the pool has an LTV
in excess of 120%.

The loan that previously had an underlying rating is the Memorial
Office Portfolio Loan ($75 million -- 4.4%), which is secured by
four office properties totaling 1.1 million square feet located in
Houston, Texas.  The portfolio was 97% occupied as of March 2009
compared to 95% at last review.  The largest tenant, Devon Energy,
will be vacating 145,669 square feet (14% of the NRA) at the
expiration of its lease on July 31, 2009.  Most of this space has
been released to Cabot Oil ("Cabot"; 96,772 square feet; 9% NRA),
but Cabot's rent, which is at market, is 25% lower than Devon's.
Due to the anticipated decrease in base revenues, the loan no
longer has an underlying rating and is now analyzed as part of the
conduit component.  Moody's current LTV is 80% compared to 70% at
last review.

The top three loans represent 22% of the pool.  The largest loan
is the DRA Fixed Pool Loan ($147.7 million -- 8.6%), which is
secured by six anchored retail centers totaling 912,000 square
feet.  The properties are located in California (4), Florida and
New Jersey.  The portfolio's weighted average occupancy as of
year-end 2008 was 95% compared to 92% at last review.  The loan
matures in January 2010.  Moody's LTV is 109%, compared to 107% at
last review.

The second largest loan is the Southridge Mall Loan
($124.0 million -- 7.2%), which is secured by the borrower's
interest in a 1.2 million square foot (617,000 square feet is
collateral) regional shopping mall located in Greendale,
Wisconsin.  The center was 78% occupied as of December 2008
compared to 98% at last review.  The increase in vacancy is
largely attributed to the closing of Steve & Barry's and Linen 'N
Things.  Financial performance has declined due to the center's
increased vacancy. The loan is interest only for its entire term.
Moody's LTV is 109% compared to 95% at last review.

The third largest loan is the Airport Industrial Park Loan
($109.5 million -- 6.2%), which is secured by a 826,000 square
foot multi-level warehouse and office complex located in Honolulu,
Hawaii.  The property was 97% occupied as of December 2008,
essentially the same as last review.  Moody's LTV is 87% compared
to 90% at last review.

Moody's rating actions is:

  -- Class A-1, $11,410,118, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 5/21/2007

  -- Class A-2, $171,978,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 5/21/2007

  -- Class A-3, $146,634,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 5/21/2007

  -- Class A-4, $ $727,260,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 5/21/2007

  -- Class A-1A, $198,209,342, affirmed at Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 5/4/2007

  -- Class A-SB, $108,204,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 5/21/2007

  -- Class A-J, $67,063,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 5/21/2007

  -- Class A-JFL, $50,000,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 5/21/2007

  -- Class X-1, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 5/21/2007

  -- Class X-2, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 5/21/2007

  -- Class B, $45,025,000, affirmed at Aa2; previously affirmed at
     Aa2 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class C, $18,009,000, affirmed at Aa3; previously affirmed at
     Aa3 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class D, $27,015,000, affirmed at A2; previously affirmed at
     A2 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class E, $22,512,000, affirmed at A3; previously affirmed at
     A3 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class F, $24,763,000, downgraded to Baa3 from Baa1;
     previously affirmed at Baa1 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class G, $18,010,000, downgraded to Ba1 from Baa2; previously
     affirmed at Baa2 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class H, $24,763,000, downgraded to B1 from Baa3; previously
     affirmed at Baa3 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class J, $6,754,000, downgraded to B2 from Ba1; previously
     affirmed at Ba1 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class K, $9,005,000, downgraded to B3 from Ba2; previously
     affirmed at Ba2 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class L, $ $6,753,000, downgraded to Caa1 from Ba3;
     previously affirmed at Ba3 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class M, $4,503,000, downgraded to Caa2 from B1; previously
     affirmed at B1 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class N, $4,502,000, downgraded to Caa3 from B2; previously
     affirmed at B2 on 5/21/2007

  -- Class P, $6,754,000, downgraded to Caa3 from B3; previously
     affirmed at to B3 on 5/21/2007


JP MORGAN: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 133 From Eight RMBS Deals
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded 133 ratings and confirmed
8 ratings from 8 subprime residential mortgage-backed securities
transactions issued by J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust.

The collateral backing these transactions consists primarily of
first-lien, fixed- and adjustable-rate, subprime residential
mortgage loans.  The actions are triggered by a combination of
factors that can include increased delinquencies, higher loss
severities, slower prepayments and mounting losses in the
underlying collateral.  Additionally, the continued deterioration
of the housing market has also contributed to the increased loss
expectations for subprime pools.  The actions listed below reflect
Moody's updated loss projections for the subprime RMBS sector
first announced in a press release on February 29, 2009, and are
part of Moody's on-going review process.

Moody's final rating actions are based on collateral performance
and updated pool-level loss expectations relative to current
levels of tranche-specific credit enhancement.  Moody's took into
account credit enhancement provided by subordination, cross-
collateralization, excess spread, time tranching, and other
structural features.

Complete rating actions are:

J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-CH1

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-2, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-3, Downgraded to A1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-4, Downgraded to A3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-5, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to B1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 2/26/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 A3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-CH2

  -- Cl. AF-1a, Downgraded to Aa1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-1b, Downgraded to Aa1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-2, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-3, Downgraded to B2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-4, Downgraded to B3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-5, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 2/26/2009 A1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-6, Downgraded to B3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-1, Downgraded to B1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-2, Downgraded to A2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-3, Downgraded to B1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-4, Downgraded to B2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-5, Downgraded to B3; previously on 2/26/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-1, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 A3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-3, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-5, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-6, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-1, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-3, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-CW2

  -- Cl. AF-1, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-2, Downgraded to A2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-3, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-4, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-5, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 2/26/2009 A1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-6, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-1, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-2, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-3, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-4, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-5, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 10/30/2008 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-1, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-1, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 2/26/2009 A1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-2, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-3, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 2/26/2009 B1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-5, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH1, Asset-Backed
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-CH1

  -- Cl. AF-1A, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-1B, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-2, Downgraded to A1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-3, Downgraded to A3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-4, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-5, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-6, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-1, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-2, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-3, Confirmed at Aaa; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-4, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-5, Downgraded to A1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-1, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-2, Downgraded to B3; previously on 2/26/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-3, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 2/26/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-4, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 2/26/2009 A3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-5, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-6, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-7, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-8, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-9, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-1, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-2, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-3, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-4, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 2/26/2009 A1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-5, Downgraded to B2; previously on 2/26/2009 A2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-6, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 2/26/2009 A3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-7, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-8, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-9, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-10, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH2, Asset-Backed
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-CH2

  -- Cl. AF-1A, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-1B, Downgraded to Aa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-2, Downgraded to B1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-3, Downgraded to B2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-4, Downgraded to B3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-5, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 2/26/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AF-6, Downgraded to B3; previously on 2/26/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-1, Downgraded to A1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-2, Downgraded to A2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-3, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-4, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. AV-5, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-1, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-3, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-5, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MF-6, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-1, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-2, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 2/26/2009 A2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-3, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-5, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-6, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-7, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. MV-8, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH3, Asset-Backed
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-CH3

  -- Cl. A-1A, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-1B, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-2, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-3, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-4, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-5, Downgraded to B1; previously on 2/26/2009 A2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to Caa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa1
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ba3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Ca Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH4, Asset-Backed
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-CH4

  -- Cl. A1, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A2, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A3, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A4, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 2/26/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A5, Downgraded to B1; previously on 2/26/2009 A3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M1, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M2, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M3, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M4, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa3 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH5

  -- Cl. A-1, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-2, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-3, Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 2/26/2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-4, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 2/26/2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. A-5, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 2/26/2009 A1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-1, Downgraded to B3; previously on 2/26/2009 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 B2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to C; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade


KATONAH IX: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Katonah IX CLO Ltd.:

  -- US$221,000,000 Class A-1L Floating Rate Notes, Due 2019,
     Downgraded to Aa3; previously on November 11, 2006 Assigned
     Aaa;

  -- Up to US$100,000,000 Class A-LV Revolving Floating Rate
     Notes, Due 2019, Downgraded to Aa3; previously on November
     11, 2006 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$23,000,000 Class A-2L Floating Rate Notes, Due 2019,
     Downgraded to Baa2; previously on March 4, 2009 Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$26,000,000 Class A-3L Floating Rate Notes, Due 2019,
     Downgraded to Ba3; previously on March 17, 2009 Downgraded to
     Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$15,000,000 Class B-1L Floating Rate Notes, Due 2019,
     Downgraded to Caa3; previously on March 17, 2009 Downgraded
     to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$15,000,000 Class B-2L Floating Rate Notes, Due 2019,
     Downgraded to Ca; previously on March 17, 2009 Downgraded to
     Caa2 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio. The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.
Moody's has also applied resecuritization stress factors to
default probability assumptions for structured finance asset
collateral as described in the press release titled "Moody's
updates its key assumptions for rating structured finance CDOs,"
published on December 11, 2008.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class B-2L Par Value Ratio Test and Additional Collateral Deposit
Requirement Test.  As of the trustee report dated as of May 15,
2009, the Moody's weighted average rating factor is 2888 versus a
test level of 2550.  Based on the same report, defaulted
securities total about $35 million, accounting for roughly 8.2% of
the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1 or lower make up
approximately 15.8% of the underlying portfolio.

Katonah IX CLO Ltd., issued in November 2006, is a collateralized
loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


LATITUDE CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Latitude CLO I Ltd.:

  -- US$45,000,000 Class A-2 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
     Due 2017, Downgraded to A2; previously on March 4, 2009 Aaa
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$43,000,000 Class B-1 Second Priority Deferrable
     Floating Rate Notes Due 2017, Downgraded to Ba2; previously
     on March 18, 2009 Downgraded to Ba1and Placed Under Review
     for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$2,000,000 Class B-2 Second Priority Deferrable Fixed
     Rate Notes Due 2017, Downgraded to B1; previously on
     March 18, 2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$13,300,000 Class C Third Priority Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes Due 2017, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on
     March 18, 2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$9,500,000 Class D Fourth Priority Deferrable Floating
     Rate Notes Due 2017, Downgraded to C; previously on March 18,
     2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," the application
of certain stresses with respect to the default probabilities
associated with certain Moody's credit estimates, and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class A, Class B, Class C, and Class D Overcollateralization
Tests.  The weighted average rating factor has steadily increased
over the last year and it is currently at 2889 versus a test level
of 2590 as of the last trustee report, dated May 20, 2009.  Based
on the same report, defaulted securities total about $31.5
million, accounting for roughly 11% of the collateral balance, and
securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 16.3% of the
underlying portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments on the
Class C and Class D Notes are presently being deferred as a result
of the failure of the Class B Overcollateralization Test.  Moody's
also assessed the collateral pool's elevated concentration risk in
a small number of obligors and industries.  This includes a
significant concentration in debt obligations of companies in the
banking, finance, real estate, and insurance industries, which
Moody's views to be more strongly correlated in the current market
environment.

Moody's also notes that a material proportion of the collateral
pool includes debt obligations whose credit quality has been
approximated through Moody's credit estimates.  Moody's analysis
reflects the application of certain stresses with respect to the
default probabilities associated with such credit estimates that
have not been recently updated.

Latitude CLO I Ltd., issued in 2005, is a collateralized loan
obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


LB-UBS COMMERCIAL: Fitch Junks Ratings on Three 2002-C4 Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded and assigned Recovery Ratings to LB-
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust commercial mortgage pass-through
certificates, series 2002-C4:

  -- $20 million class L to 'BBB-' from 'BBB'; Outlook to Negative
     from Stable;

  -- $7.3 million class M to 'BB' from 'BB+'; Outlook to Negative
     from Stable;

  -- $7.3 million class N to 'B+' from 'BB'; Outlook to Negative
     from Stable;

  -- $3.6 million class Q to 'CCC/RR1' from 'B';

  -- $1.8 million class S to 'CC/RR3' from 'B-';

  -- $3.6 million class T to 'C/RR5' from 'CCC'.

In addition, Fitch affirms and revises Rating Outlooks to these
classes:

  -- $12.7 million class J at 'AA-'; Outlook to Negative from
     Stable;

  -- $12.7 million class K at 'A-'; Outlook to Negative from
     Stable.

Fitch also affirms and maintains Rating Outlooks:

  -- $21 million class A-2 at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- $63.9 million class A-3 at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- $86 million class A-4 at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- $850.5 million class A-5 at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- Interest-only class X-CL at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- Interest-only class X-CP at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- Interest-only class X-VF at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- $18.2 million class B at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- $20 million class C at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- $20 million class D at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- $12.7 million class E at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- $16.4 million class F at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- $10.9 million class G at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable;
  -- $12.7 million class H at 'AAA'; Outlook Stable.

Class A-1 has paid in full. Fitch does not rate classes P or U.

The downgrades reflect an increase in specially serviced loans and
expected losses since Fitch's last rating action.  Rating Outlooks
reflect the likely direction of any rating changes over the next
one to two years.  The Negative Rating Outlooks reflect the
increase in Fitch Loans of Concern.  As of the May 2009
distribution date, the pool's aggregate principal balance has been
reduced by 15.8% to $1.23 billion from $1.45 billion at issuance.
Thirty-one loans (40.5%) have defeased, including five of the 10
largest loans (23.5%).

Fitch has identified 15 Loans of Concern (9.3%), including five
specially serviced loans (2.6%).  The largest specially serviced
loan (1.7%) is a 171,103 square foot office property located in
Norwalk, Connecticut.  The property has suffered from significant
tenant turnover and vacancies the past two years.  Occupancy as of
year-end 2008 was 52.8%.  The special servicer is working to gain
control of the asset and Fitch expects significant losses are
likely upon liquidation unless occupancy is stabilized.

The second largest specially serviced asset (0.4%) is a 230-unit
multifamily property located in Dallas, Texas.  The asset is
cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with another asset in
special servicing (0.1%), a 59-unit multifamily also located in
Dallas, Texas.  Both assets transferred to special servicing for
monetary default in 2009.

The third largest asset in special servicing (0.3%) is a 46,021 sf
retail center constructed in 2000 in Decatur, Illinois.  The
property was anchored by Circuit City which occupied 63% net
rentable area and has vacated its space due to its bankruptcy and
liquidation.

The largest Fitch Loan of Concern (4.4%) is secured by a 365,900
sf office building located in Crystal City, Virginia.
Approximately 31% of the NRA is scheduled for lease expiration in
2009.  The borrower is negotiating with the current tenants on
lease renewals.  As of YE 2008, the servicer reported occupancy
was 97.2% with a debt service coverage ratio of 1.90 times (x).
The current market vacancy rate is 13%.

There are five shadow rated loans in the transaction.  Two of the
shadow rated loans, 605 Third Avenue (12.5%) and the Horizon
Portfolio (1.6%), are defeased.  Fitch reviewed servicer-provided
performance data for the remaining three non-defeased shadow rated
loans; Westfield Shoppingtown Valley Fair Mall (21.6%), Hamilton
Mall (5.9%), and 1166 Avenue of the Americas (5.1%).  All these
loans maintain their investment grade shadow ratings due to stable
performance.

Westfield Shoppingtown Valley Fair Mall, is secured by 714,603 sf
within a 1.4 million sf shopping mall located in Santa Clara,
California.  The mall's anchors are Macy's and Nordstrom, which
are not part of the collateral.  As of December 2008, the
collateral was 98% occupied, which is a slight improvement over
the 96.1% occupancy rate at issuance.  The property has
approximately 9% rollover exposure in 2009 and 2010.

The 1166 Avenue of the Americas loan is secured by 560,925 sf of a
1.6 million sf, 44-story office tower located in New York City.
The sole tenant, Marsh & McClennan Companies Inc., occupies 100%
of the collateral.  The $62.3 million trust balance is pari-passu
with a $72.4 million note not included in the transaction.

The Hamilton Mall loan is secured by 836,236 sf of a 1 million sf
mall located in Mays Landing, New Jersey that is anchored by
Macy's, Sears, and JC Penney.  Occupancy has been stable since
issuance.  As of YE 2008, the collateral was 90.2% occupied
compared to 94.1% at issuance; however, the cash flow remains
stable since issuance.  The mall has approximately 9% rollover
exposure in 2009 and 2010.  The sponsor is Kravco Simon.


LB-UBS COMMERCIAL: Moody's Affirms Ratings on 15 Pooled Classes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of fifteen pooled
classes and seven rake classes and downgraded seven pooled classes
and one rake class of LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2003-7.
The downgrades are due to higher expected losses for the pool
resulting from anticipated losses from specially serviced loans.
The action is the result of Moody's on-going surveillance of
commercial mortgage backed securities transactions.

As of the May 15, 2009 distribution date, the transaction's
aggregate principal balance has decreased by approximately 32% to
$9.9 million from $1.46 billion at securitization.  The
Certificates are collateralized by 50 loans, ranging in size from
less than 1% to 21% of the pool, with the top ten loans
representing 69% of the pool.  The pool includes four loans with
investment grade underlying ratings, representing 42% of the pool.
At securitization, a fifth loan, the Parklawn Building Loan
($100.0 million -- 10.1%) had an underlying rating.  The loan no
longer has an underlying rating due to a decline in performance
and the loan is now analyzed as part of the conduit pool.  Twelve
loans, representing 17% of the pool, have defeased and are
collateralized by U.S. Government securities.

Five loans, representing 4.0% of the pool, are on the master
servicer's watchlist.  The watchlist includes loans which meet
certain portfolio review guidelines established as part of the
Commercial Mortgage Securities Association's monthly reporting
package.  As part of Moody's ongoing monitoring of a transaction,
Moody's reviews the watchlist to assess which loans have material
issues that could impact performance.

Two loans have been liquidated from the pool resulting in a
realized loss of approximately $603,597.  Currently, there are
three loans, representing 17.0%, in special servicing.  Two of the
specially serviced loans, representing 14.0% of the pool, are
secured by malls owned by General Growth Properties.  These
properties were included in GGP's April 16, 2009 Chapter 11
bankruptcy filing and the loans were subsequently transferred to
special servicing.  At this point, Moody's does not anticipate
losses from these loans.  Moody's expects a $10.4 million loss
(32% loss severity) for the third specially serviced loan.

Moody's was provided with full-year 2007 and partial-year 2008
operating results for 97% and 78% of the pool, respectively.
Moody's weighted average loan to value ratio for the conduit
component is 90% compared to 95% at Moody's prior full review in
December 2007.

The largest loan with an underlying rating is the Bank of America
Building Loan ($206.7 million -- 21.0%), which represents the
pooled portion of a $212.5 million mortgage loan.  The loan is
secured by a 1.1 million square foot office building located in
midtown Manhattan.  The largest tenant is Bank of America
Corporation (Moody's senior unsecured rating A2 - stable outlook),
which leases 19% of the net rentable area through December 2013.
The non-pooled portion of the loan ($5.8 million) is held within
the trust and serves as security for non-pooled Class BA.  The
property was 89% occupied as of February 2009 compared to 93% at
last review and 100% at securitization. Performance has declined
due to reduced rental revenues.  Moody's current underlying rating
of the pooled and non-pooled loan is Baa3 compared Baa1 at last
review.

The second largest loan with an underlying rating is the Valley
Plaza Loan ($95.0 million -- 9.6%), which is secured by a
1.2 million square foot super regional mall located in
Bakersfield, California.  The center is anchored by Sears, J.C.
Penney and Macy's.  A fourth anchor, Gottschalks vacated the
center after its bankruptcy.  The loan sponsor is GGP.  Moody's
analysis reflects a stressed cash flow due to concerns about the
weak retail environment and potential impact of GGP's bankruptcy
on property performance.  Moody's current underlying rating is
Baa1 compared to A3 at last review.

The third largest loan with an underlying rating is the Westfield
Shoppingtown Santa Anita Loan ($69.0 million -- 7.0%), which
represents the senior portion of a $90.7 million mortgage loan.
The loan is secured by a 1.3 million square foot regional shopping
center located approximately 18 miles east of Los Angeles in
Arcadia, California.  The center is anchored by J.C. Penney,
Macy's and Nordstrom.  The $21.7 junior note is held outside the
trust.  The property is also encumbered by a $75.5 million B Note,
which is also held outside the trust.  Property performance has
been stable.  Moody's current underlying rating is Aaa, the same
as at last review.

The fourth largest loan with an underlying rating is Visalia Mall
Loan ($41.4 million -- 4.2%), which is secured by a 440,000 square
foot regional center located in Visalia, California.  The center
is anchored by J.C. Penney, which is not part of the security.
The second anchor, Gottschalks vacated the center after its
bankruptcy.  Performance has declined due to a decline in rental
revenues.  The loan sponsor is GGP.  Moody's analysis reflects a
stressed cash flow due to concerns about the weak retail
environment and potential impact of GGP's bankruptcy on
performance.  Moody's current underlying rating is Baa1 compared
to Aa3 at last review.

The loan that had an underlying rating at securitization is the
Parklawn Building Loan ($100.0 million -- 10.1%), which is secured
by a 1.4 million square foot office building located in Rockville,
Maryland.  The property is 98.0% occupied by the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services through July 2010.  The loan matures
in August 2010.  Although property performance has been stable,
Moody's is concerned about the near-term refinance risk given the
lease rollover of the entire building and the current weak
Rockville office market.  Moody's analysis reflects a dark lit
valuation, assuming that the tenant vacates at lease expiration
and the entire building has to be retenanted.  Moody's current LTV
is 97% compared to 67% at last review.

The top three conduit exposures represent 11.9% of the pool.  The
largest conduit loan is the Moorestown Mall Loan ($58.1 million --
5.9%), which is secured by a 1.1 million square foot regional mall
located in Moorestown, New Jersey.  The mall is anchored by Sears,
Boscov's, Lord & Taylor and Macy's.  Moody's LTV is 85% compared
to 81% at last review and 88.0% at securitization.

The second largest conduit exposure is the Shops at Gainey Village
Loan ($37.2 million -- 3.8%), which is secured by a 138,000 square
foot unanchored shopping center located in Scottsdale, Arizona.
The property was 94% leased as of January 2009 compared to 83% at
last review.  Property performance has declined due to increased
expenses.  Moody's LTV is 95% compared to 92% at last review.

The third largest conduit exposure is the Gotham Plaza
($22.1 million -- 2.3%), which is secured by an office building
located in New York City.  The property is 100% occupied.  Moody's
LTV is 67% compared to 75% at last review.

Moody's rating action is:

  -- Class A-2, $137,852,097 affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 12/12/07

  -- Class A-3, $187,000,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 12/12/07

  -- Class A-4, $355,336,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 12/12/07

  -- Class A-1B, $79,517,882 affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 12/12/07

  -- Class X-CL, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 12/12/07 12/12/07

  -- Class X-CP, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 12/12/07

  -- Class X-SU, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously upgraded to
     Aaa from Aa3 12/12/07

  -- Class B, $18,090,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 12/12/07

  -- Class C, $21,707,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 12/12/07

  -- Class D, $16,281,000 affirmed at Aa2; previously affirmed at
     Aa2 on 12/12/07

  -- Class E, $16,280,000 affirmed at Aa3; previously affirmed at
     Aa3 on 12/12/07

  -- Class F, $12,663,000 affirmed at A2; previously affirmed at
     A2 on 12/12/07

  -- Class G, $23,516,000 affirmed at A3; previously affirmed at
     A3 on 12/12/07

  -- Class H, $21,708,000 affirmed at Baa1; previously affirmed at
     Baa1 on 12/12/07

  -- Class J, $14,471,000 affirmed at Baa2; previously affirmed at
     Baa2 on 12/12/07

  -- Class K, $14,472,000 downgraded to Ba1 from Baa3; previously
     affirmed at Baa3 on 12/12/07

  -- Class L, $12,663,000 downgraded to Ba3 from Ba1; previously
     affirmed at Ba1 on 12/12/07

  -- Class M, $7,235,000 downgraded to B1 from Ba2; previously
     affirmed at Ba2 on 12/12/07

  -- Class N, $3,618,000 downgraded to B2 from Ba3; previously
     affirmed at Ba3 on 12/12/07

  -- Class P, $3,618,000 downgraded to B3 from B1; previously
     affirmed at B1 on 12/12/07

  -- Class Q, $3,618,000 downgraded to Caa2 from B2; previously
     affirmed at B2 on 12/12/07

  -- Class S, $3,618,000 downgraded to Caa3 from B3; previously
     affirmed at B3 on 12/12/07

  -- Class BA, $5,800,000 downgraded to Baa3 from Baa1; previously
     affirmed at Baa1 on 12/12/07

  -- Class SU-1, $1,300,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously upgraded
     to Aaa from Aa3 12/12/07

  -- Class SU-2, $1,470,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously upgraded
     to Aaa from A1 12/12/07

  -- Class SU-3, $1,730,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously upgraded
     to Aaa from A2 12/12/07

  -- Class SU-4, $1,270,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously upgraded
     to Aaa from A3 12/12/07

  -- Class SU-5, $1,355,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously upgraded
     to Aaa from Baa1 12/12/07

  -- Class SU-6, $1,625,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously upgraded
     to Aaa from Baa2 12/12/07

  -- Class SU-7, $2,250,000 affirmed at Aaa; previously upgraded
     to Aaa from Baa3 12/12/07


LB-UBS COMMERCIAL: Moody's Affirms Ratings on 2003-C3 Certs.
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of 16 pooled
classes, upgraded six pooled classes and downgraded three rake
classes of LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2003-C3, Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-C3.  The upgrades
are due to increased credit enhancement due to amortization and
payoffs.  The pool balance has decreased by 23% since Moody's last
review.  The downgrades are due to higher expected losses from the
Monroeville Mall Loan resulting from increased leverage.  The
action is the result of Moody's on-going surveillance of
commercial mortgage backed securities transactions.

As of the June 15, 2009 distribution date, the transaction's
aggregate principal balance has decreased by approximately 32% to
$914 million from $1.4 billion at securitization.  The
Certificates are collateralized by 85 loans, ranging in size from
less than 1% to 15% of the pool, with the top ten loans
representing 66% of the pool.  The pool includes four loans with
underlying ratings, which represent 50% of the pool.  Fifteen
loans, representing 12% of the pool, have defeased and are
collateralized by U.S. Government securities.

Seventeen loans, representing 19% of the pool, are on the master
servicer's watchlist.  The watchlist includes loans which meet
certain portfolio review guidelines established as part of the
Commercial Mortgage Securities Association's monthly reporting
package.  As part of Moody's ongoing monitoring of a transaction,
Moody's reviews the watchlist to assess which loans have material
issues that could impact performance.

Two loans have been liquidated from the pool, resulting in a
realized loss of approximately $110,000.  Currently there is one
loan, representing less than 1% of the pool, in special servicing.
Moody's is estimating a loss of approximately $2.9 million from
this loan.

Moody's was provided with year-end 2008 and year-end 2007
operating results for 76% and 96% of the non-defeased performing
loans, respectively. Moody's weighted average loan to value (LTV)
ratio for the conduit component is 91% compared to 85% at Moody's
prior full review in February 2008.

The largest loan with an underlying rating is the Westfield
Shoppingtown West County Loan ($134 million -- 15%), which is
secured by the borrower's interest in a 1.3 million square foot
regional mall located in Des Peres, Missouri.  The mall is
anchored by Macy's, J.C. Penney and Nordstrom.  The center was 99%
leased as of January 2009, compared to 98% at securitization.  The
sponsor is CBL & Associates, who acquired the property in 2007
from Westfield America Inc.  The center is also encumbered by a
$19.5 million B Note that is held outside the trust.  Moody's
current underlying rating is A1, the same as last review.

The second largest loan with an underlying rating is the Polaris
Fashion Place Loan ($111 million -- 12%), which is secured by the
borrower's interest in a 1.6 million square foot regional mall
located in Columbus, Ohio.  The mall is anchored by Sears, Macy's,
J.C. Penney, Saks Fifth Avenue, Van Maur and The Great Indoors.
The mall was 99% leased as of December 2008, essentially the same
as at last review.  The property is also encumbered by a
$24.8 million B Note that is held outside the trust.  Property
performance has been stable.  Moody's underlying rating is A2, the
same as at last review.

The third largest loan with an underlying rating is the
Monroeville Mall Loan ($102 million -- 11%), which is secured by
the borrower's interest in a 1.3 million square foot regional mall
located in Monroeville, Pennsylvania.  The mall is anchored by
Macy's and J.C. Penney. Since Moody's last review, the former
Boscov's anchor space has become vacant; the anchor space is not
part of the collateral.  However, vacant anchor spaces,
particularly in malls with relatively low sales productivity, can
have a detrimental effect on in-line occupancy over time.  Inline
occupancy for the property was 90% as of December 2008, compared
to 95% at last review.  The sponsor is CBL & Associates, who
acquired the property in 2007.  The property is also encumbered by
a $16.7 million B Note that is held within the trust and serves as
security for non-pooled Classes MM-1, MM-2, MM-3 and X-MM2.
Property performance has declined due to decreased revenues and
increased expenses.  At securitization, Moody's assumed the owner
would exercise a purchase option for the underlying land.  The
date to exercise this option has passed and the property must now
pay ground lease payments which have a significant impact on
property performance.  Moody's underlying rating is Ba3 compared
to A3 at last review.

The fourth largest loan with an underlying rating is the Pembroke
Lakes Mall Loan ($101 million -- 11%), which is secured by the
borrower's interest in a 1.1 million square foot regional mall
located in Pembroke Pines, Florida.  The mall is anchored by
Macy's, J.C. Penney, Dillard's, Sears, Dillard's Men, and Macy's
Home Store.  The center was 99% leased as of December 2008,
essentially the same as at last review.  The sponsor is General
Growth Properties.  The property is also encumbered by a
$30.0 million B Note that is held outside the trust.  This loan
was not included in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of General
Growth Properties and affiliates on April 16, 2009.  Performance
for the mall has been stable since last review; however, Moody's
has incorporated extra stress over concerns about the retail
environment and the GGP bankruptcy filing.  Moody's current
underlying rating is Aa1 compared to Aaa at last review.

The top three non-defeased conduit loans represent 27% of the
pool.  The largest conduit loan is the Broadcasting Square Loan
($46 million -- 13%), which is secured by a 467,000 square foot
power center located in Reading, Pennsylvania.  The largest
tenants are Weis Market, Dick's Clothing & Sports, and Bed Bath &
Beyond.  The center was 100% leased as of December 2008; the same
as last review.  Moody's LTV is 83% compared to 88% at last
review.

The second largest conduit loan is the LIRA Apartments Loan
($29 million -- 9%), which is secured by a 152- unit apartment
building located in New York City.  The property has maintained
near 100% occupancy since securitization.  The loan benefits from
the property's location in the strong NYC multifamily market and
amortization.  Moody's LTV is 64% compared to 79% at last review.

The third largest conduit loan is the Lynnfield Office Park Loan
($16 million -- 5%), which is secured by a 282,000 square foot
office building located in Memphis, Tennessee.  The property was
86% leased as of March 2009 compared to 79% at last review.
Despite the increased occupancy, property performance has declined
due to decreased rental revenue and increased expenses.  Moody's
LTV is 110% compared to 95% at last review.

Moody's full rating action is:

  -- Class A-3, $146,355,477, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 2/07/08.

  -- Class A-4, $550,837,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 2/07/08.

  -- Class X-CL, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 2/07/08.

  -- Class X-CP, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 2/07/08.

  -- Class X-WC, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 2/07/08.

  -- Class X-MM1, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 2/07/08.

  -- Class B, $20,044,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 2/07/08.

  -- Class C, $20,044,000, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed at
     Aaa on 2/07/08.

  -- Class D, $13,363,000, upgraded to Aaa from Aa2; previously
     affirmed at Aa2 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class E, $13,363,000, upgraded to Aa1 from Aa3; previously
     affirmed at Aa3 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class F, $23,384,000, upgraded to Aa2 from A1; previously
     affirmed at A1 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class G, $10,023,000, upgraded to A1 from A3; previously
     affirmed at A3 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class H, $20,044,000, upgraded to A3 from Baa1; previously
     affirmed at Baa1 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class J, $10,022,000, upgraded to Baa1 from Baa2; previously
     affirmed at Baa2 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class K, $13,363,000, affirmed at Baa3; previously affirmed
     at Baa3 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class L, $11,692,000, affirmed at Ba1; previously affirmed at
     Ba1 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class M, $6,681,000, affirmed at Ba2; previously affirmed at
     Ba2 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class N, $6,682,000, affirmed at Ba3; previously affirmed at
     Ba3 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class P, $1,670,000, affirmed at B1; previously affirmed at
     B1 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class Q, $8,352,000, affirmed at B2; previously affirmed at
     B2 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class S, $3,341,000, affirmed at B3; previously affirmed at
     B3 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class MM-1, $6,800,000, downgraded to B1 from Baa1;
     previously affirmed at Baa1 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class MM-2, $5,300,000, downgraded to B2 from Baa2;
     previously affirmed at Baa2 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class MM-3, $4,567,108, downgraded to B3 from Baa3;
     previously affirmed at Baa3 on 2/07/08.

  -- Class X-MM2, Notional, affirmed at Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 2/07/08.


LEHMAN BROTHERS: Moody's Reviews Ratings on Series 2004-LLF Certs.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed one rake class of Lehman Brothers
Floating Rate Commercial Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-
Through Certificates, Series 2004-LLF C5 on review for possible
downgrade due to concerns about potential non-reimbursed trust
expenses and interest shortfalls associated with a loan in special
servicing.  On May 27, 2009, the pool's third largest loan, Westin
Galleria & Westin Oaks, was transferred to special servicing.  The
rating action is the result of Moody's on-going surveillance of
commercial mortgage backed securities transactions.

Like non-pooled bonds, rake bonds are exposed to the first loss
occurring on a single loan, or to the non-reimbursed trust
expenses and interest shortfalls that may occur as a result of the
loan being transferred to special servicing.  There is no benefit
from the pooling of cash flows from other loans.  As a result,
special servicing fees, legal expenses, and other trust expenses
may create interest shortfalls that could negatively impact the
non-rated or rated classes in reverse sequential order.  In some
cases, these shortfalls and expenses may not be reimbursed by the
loan borrower upon the return of the loan to master servicing.

As of the June 15, 2009 distribution date, the transaction's
aggregate certificate balance has decreased by 75% to $334 million
from $1.3 billion at securitization due to the payoff of loans.
The Certificates are collateralized by four mortgage loans ranging
in size from 12% to 43% of the pool.

One loan, representing 16% of the pool, is currently in special
servicing.  The Westin Galleria & Westin Oaks Loan ($47.1 million
pooled balance and $4.9 million rake balance) is secured by two
hotel properties located in Houston, Texas.  The loan was
transferred to special servicing on May 27, 2009 for imminent
default.  The loan has been unable to secure take-out financing.
The loan is interest-only for the full term and matures in July
2009.  There is additional debt in the form of a $12 million
mezzanine loan.

Moody's review will focus on the performance of the overall pool
and potential losses from specially serviced loans.

Moody's rating action is:

  -- Class A-2, $45,768,934, currently rated Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 3/4/2009

  -- Class X-2, Notional, currently rated Aaa; previously affirmed
     at Aaa on 3/4/2009

  -- Class X1-WO, Notional, currently rated Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 3/4/2009

  -- Class B, $42,600,000, currently rated Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 3/4/2009


  -- Class C, $44,600,000, currently rated Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 3/4/2009

  -- Class D, $31,500,000, currently rated Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 3/4/2009

  -- Class E, $28,200,000, currently rated Aaa; previously
     affirmed at Aaa on 3/4/2009

  -- Class F, $28,900,000, currently rated Aa3; previously
     downgraded to Aa3 from Aaa on 3/4/2009

  -- Class G, $27,800,000, currently rated A1; previously
     downgraded to A1 from Aa1 on 3/4/2009

  -- Class H, $22,800,000, currently rated A3; previously
     downgraded to A3 from Aa3 on 3/4/2009

  -- Class J, $25,100,000, currently rated Baa2; previously
     downgraded to Baa2 from A3 on 3/4/2009

  -- Class K, $31,531,066, currently rated Ba3; previously
     downgraded to Ba3 from Baa3 on 3/4/2009

  -- Class WO, $4,900,000, currently rated Baa1, on review for
     possible downgrade; previously downgraded to Baa1 from A2 on
     3/4/2009


MARATHON CLO: Moody's Keeps Junk Rating on Class E Notes
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Marathon CLO I Ltd.:

  -- US$221,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to A1; previously on May 6, 2005
     Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$30,000,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Revolving Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to A1; previously on May
     6, 2005 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$8,100,000 Class B Floating Rate Senior Secured Notes
     Due 2019, Downgraded to A3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

Additionally, Moody's has confirmed the ratings of these notes:

  -- US$19,200,000 Class C Floating Rate Senior Subordinate
     Deferrable Interest Notes Due 2019, Confirmed at Ba1;
     previously on March 18, 2009 Downgraded to Ba1and Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$19,000,000 Class D Floating Rate Subordinate Deferrable
     Interest Notes Due 2019, Confirmed at B1; previously on March
     18, 2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$8,000,000 Class E Floating Rate Subordinate Deferrable
     Interest Notes Due 2019, Confirmed at Caa3; previously on
     March 18, 2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research (see Moody's Special Comment
titled "Strong Loan Issuance in Recent Years Signals Low Recovery
Prospects for Loans and Bonds of Defaulted U.S. Corporate
Issuers," dated June 2008).

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class C, Class D, and Class E Overcollateralization Tests.  The
weighted average rating factor has steadily increased over the
last year and it is currently at 3639 versus a test level of 2770
as of the last trustee report, dated May 15, 2009.  Based on the
same report, defaulted securities total about $12.8 million,
accounting for roughly 4% of the collateral balance, and
securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 22.7% of the
underlying portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments on the
Class D and Class E Notes are presently being deferred as a result
of the failure of the Class C Overcollateralization Test.  Moody's
also assessed the collateral pool's elevated concentration risk in
a small number of obligors and industries.  This includes a
significant concentration in debt obligations of companies in the
banking, finance, real estate, and insurance industries, which
Moody's views to be more strongly correlated in the current market
environment.

Moody's also notes that a material proportion of the collateral
pool includes debt obligations whose credit quality has been
approximated through Moody's credit estimates.  Moody's analysis
reflects the application of certain stresses with respect to the
default probabilities associated with such credit estimates that
have not been recently updated.

Marathon CLO I Ltd., issued in 2005, is a collateralized loan
obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


MARATHON CLO: Moody's Cuts Rating on Class D Notes to Ca
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Marathon CLO II Ltd.:

  -- Class A-1B Floating Rate Senior Secured Notes Due 2019,
     Downgraded to A2; previously on March 18, 2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Secured Notes Due 2019,
     Downgraded to Baa2; previously on March 18, 2009 Downgraded
     to Aa2 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- Class D Floating Rate Subordinated Deferrable Interest
     Secured Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to Ca; previously on
     March 18, 2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

Additionally, Moody's has confirmed the ratings on these notes:

  -- Class B Floating Rate Senior Deferrable Interest Secured
     Notes Due 2019, Confirmed at Ba3; previously on March 18,
     2009 Downgraded to Ba3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- Class C Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Secured Notes Due
     2019, Confirmed at B3; previously on March 18, 2009
     Downgraded to B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in, among
other metrics, a decline in the average credit rating (as measured
through the weighted average rating factor), an increase in the
dollar amount of defaulted securities, an increase in the
proportion of securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and
failure of the Diversity Test and the Class B, Class C, and Class
D Overcollateralization Tests.  The weighted average rating factor
has steadily increased over the last year and it is currently at
3525 versus a test level of 2750 as of the last trustee report,
dated May 19, 2009.  Based on the same report, defaulted
securities total about $21.5 million accounting for roughly 5.45%
of the collateral balance and securities rated Caa1 or lower make
up approximately 21.6% of the underlying portfolio.  Additionally,
interest payments on the Class C and Class D Notes are presently
being deferred as a result of the failure of the Class B
Overcollateralization Test.  Moody's also assessed the collateral
pool's elevated concentration risk in a small number of obligors
and industries.  This includes a significant concentration in debt
obligations of companies in the banking, finance, real estate, and
insurance industries, which Moody's views to be more strongly
correlated in the current market environment.  Finally, Moody's
also notes that a material proportion of the collateral pool
includes debt obligations whose credit quality has been
approximated through Moody's credit estimates.  Moody's analysis
reflects the application of certain stresses with respect to the
default probabilities associated with such credit estimates that
have not been recently updated.

Marathon CLO II Ltd., issued in 2005, is a collateralized loan
obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


MERRILL LYNCH: S&P Downgrades Ratings on Five 1999-C1 Certs.
------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on five
classes of commercial mortgage pass-through certificates from
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc.'s series 1999-C1.  At the
same time, S&P placed its ratings on seven classes on CreditWatch
with negative implications.

The downgrades follow S&P's preliminary analysis and reflect S&P's
expectation that the master servicer, KeyBank Real Estate Capital,
will likely recover significant outstanding advances totaling
approximately $16 million.  The advances are primarily due to
litigation expenses on the Arlington Apartments asset
($6.2 million), and the timing of their recovery reflects the
expected maturity of all but one of the remaining assets in the
pool.  The CreditWatch placements reflect S&P's concerns with the
remaining six assets ($45.0 million, 14.4%) with the special
servicer, ORIX Capital Markets LLC, and S&P's concerns regarding
the refinancing risk of the remaining loans in the pool.

The Arlington Apartments asset ($18.0 million total exposure,
3.8%) was transferred to the special servicer on March 20, 2001.
The 415-unit multifamily property in Harvey, La., was previously
in foreclosure, and an agreement was reached to sell the property
for $6.5 million on Oct. 25, 2004.  The special servicer pursued
the collection of a $14.5 million judgment against the former
borrowers/guarantors.  While a settlement was reached in February
2009, the proceeds from the settlement, which include real estate
and other assets, have not yet been liquidated and/or released
from the bankruptcy court.  In S&P's view, this litigation was
significant.  The master servicer incurred advances totaling
approximately $16 million that remain outstanding and that will
likely begin to be recovered from the trust in the near future.

S&P expects the advance recovery rate to accelerate due to the
forthcoming loan maturities in the transaction, which will cause
further liquidity interruptions to the trust.  The potential
liquidity interruptions may prompt Standard & Poor's to lower its
ratings on the outstanding senior classes by multiple rating
categories.  S&P may lower some of S&P's ratings on the
subordinate classes to 'D' if the interest shortfalls occur for an
extended period.

Standard & Poor's expects to resolve the CreditWatch negative
placements as more information concerning the recovery of advances
becomes available and after S&P review the credit characteristics
of the remaining loans in the pool.

        Ratings Lowered And Placed On Creditwatch Negative

               Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc.
   Commercial mortgage pass-through certificates series 1999-C1

                      Rating
                      ------
      Class    To              From    Credit enhancement (%)
      -----    --              ----    ----------------------
      B        BBB+/Watch Neg  AAA                      35.28
      C        BBB/Watch Neg   AA+                      26.78
      D        BBB-/Watch Neg  AA                       23.93
      E        BB/Watch Neg    BBB+                     17.31
      F        B-/Watch Neg    B+                       14.95

              Ratings Placed On Creditwatch Negative

               Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc.
   Commercial mortgage pass-through certificates series 1999-C1

                   Rating
                   ------
    Class    To                From    Credit enhancement (%)
    -----    --                ----    ----------------------
    A2       AAA/Watch Neg     AAA                      45.68
    IO       AAA/Watch Neg     AAA                        N/A

                      N/A - Not applicable.


MUHLENBERG REGIONAL: Moody's Withdraws 'Ba3' Rating on Bonds
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service will withdraw the Ba3 rating assigned to
debt outstanding for Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center (NJ) upon
the refunding and defeasance of the bonds by debt to be issued
through the New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority
State Contract Bonds (Hospital Asset Transformation Program
(HATP), Series 2009A).  The refunding is expected to occur on
Thursday, June 18, 2009.  The bonds are payable solely from
anticipated contract payments to be made by the State of New
Jersey from its general fund.  Moody's has assigned an A1 to the
Contract Bonds, which reflects the need for annual legislative
appropriation of the contract payments, as well as the state's
credit quality (general obligation bond rating of Aa3).  The
outlook is stable.

The bonds are the third issuance under the state's Hospital Asset
Transformation Program, which was established to assist non-profit
hospitals.  The program was devised after the New Jersey Advisory
Commission on Hospitals, in 1999, recommended closures to address
excess hospital capacity.  Enabling legislation was passed in 2000
in order to facilitate such actions.  Proceeds of bonds issued by
the authority under this program are used to defease the debt of
non-profit hospitals in connection with mergers and closures amid
a statewide consolidation of acute-care providers and to provide
capital for the enhancement and transition of acute care services
to the acquirer entity.

Moody's analysis is based on Solaris Health System, parent
organization of JFK Medical Center/Hartwyck at Oak Tree and
Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center.  Proceeds of the 2009A State
Contract Bonds will refinance the outstanding bonds of MRMC and
JFK.  MRMC was closed in August 2008; the Series 2009A bonds will
also provide new money debt for capital improvements at JFK to
accommodate the additional patient volume at JFK that had
previously been treated at MRMC.

Rated Debt To Be Defeased (debt outstanding as of December 31,
2008)

$17.275 million outstanding, Series 2000, Ambac insured,
Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center issue, annual debt service
guaranteed by Solaris

The last rating action was on October 10, 2008, when the Watchlist
was extended for the Ba3 rating of Muhlenberg Regional Medical
Center and the Watchlist directional was changed from uncertain to
downgrade.


MUZINICH CBO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded these
notes issued by Muzinich CBO II, Limited:

  -- US$303,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Notes Due October
     15, 2013, Downgraded to B1; previously on 2/1/2002 Assigned
     Aa1;

  -- US$25,000,000 Class A-2 Fixed Rate Notes Due October 15,
     2013, Downgraded to B1; previously on 2/1/2002 Assigned Aa1;

  -- US$36,000,000 Class B-1 Floating Rate Senior Notes Due
     October 15, 2013, Downgraded to C; previously on 8/30/2005
     Downgraded to Ba1;

  -- US$7,750,000 Class B-2 Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes Due
     October 15, 2013, Downgraded to C; previously on previously
     on 8/30/2005 Downgraded to Ba1;

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds will be below their historical
averages, consistent with Moody's research (see Moody's Special
Comment titled "Strong Loan Issuance in Recent Years Signals Low
Recovery Prospects for Loans and Bonds of Defaulted U.S. Corporate
Issuers" dated June 2008).

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in, among
others, a decline in the average credit rating (as measured
through the weighted average rating factor), an increase in the
dollar amount of defaulted securities, an increase in the
proportion of securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and
failure of the Class B Overcollateralization Test, the Interest
Coverage Test, the Diversity Score Test and the Weighted Average
Coupon Test.  The weighted average rating factor has steadily
increased over the last year and it is currently at 3607 versus a
test level of 2475 as of the last trustee report, dated 5/1/2009.
Based on the same report, defaulted securities total $18 million
accounting for roughly 12% of the collateral balance and
securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 37% of the
underlying portfolio.  Additionally, interest payments on the
Class B-1 and Class B-2 Notes are presently being deferred as a
result of the failure of the Class A Interest Coverage Test.
Moody's also assessed the collateral pool's elevated concentration
risk in a small number of obligors and industries.  This includes
a significant concentration in debt obligations of companies in
the banking, finance, real estate, and insurance industries, which
Moody's views to be more strongly correlated in the current market
environment Moody's also noted that the transaction is negatively
impacted by large pay-fixed, receive-floating interest rate swap
where payments to the hedge counterparty absorb a large portion of
the excess spread in the deal.

Muzinich CBO II, Limited, issued on 12/28/2001, is a
collateralized bond obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior unsecured bonds.


NEW ORLEANS: S&P Raises Underlying Rating on Tax Bonds From 'BB'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services raised its underlying rating on
New Orleans Exhibition Hall Authority, Louisiana's series 1996A,
1996C, 1998, and 2000 hotel-occupancy tax and special-tax bonds
three notches to 'BBB+' from 'BB' based on the improved pledged
revenue stream, improving revenues, and improved occupancy rates.
The outlook is stable.

At the same time, Standard & Poor's revised its outlook on the
authority's 2004 senior-subordinated special-tax bonds to stable
from positive, and raised the SPUR to 'BBB' from 'B' based on
improved debt service coverage, improving revenue stream, and
improved occupancy rates.  On Sept. 5, 2007, the authority
defeased the 2003A senior-subordinate special tax bonds, which
were issued in 2003 and dedicated to the construction of an
expansion project.  Management performed several studies regarding
market demand, national trends, and the growth and stability of
the convention and exhibition business; they determined that an
expansion was not in the authority's best interests.

A state loan funded by Louisiana Gulf Opportunity Tax Credit
bonds, issued in June 2006, provided debt service payments through
January 2008.  The zone proceeds were used to make three debt
service payments, totaling $28.3 million, with repayment scheduled
to begin in fiscal 2012.

The senior series 1996A, 1996B, 1998, and 2000 bonds benefit from
a closed lien and a senior pledge of certain taxes, primarily a
combined 2% hotel and food and beverage taxes, received by the
authority.

In S&P's view, the rating reflects the authority's improved
occupancy rates; improved revenue stream; recovery of hotel and
restaurant industry; increasing number of convention center
events; and strong 1.46x combined coverage based on fiscal 2009
projected pledged revenue collections.

S&P believes these factors limit the credit strengths credit risks
associated with revenues derived from taxes on discretionary and
potentially cyclical items, such as hotel rooms; national economic
downturn, which has led to the cancellation of convention events
and a decline in visitors to the city; and the repayment of the
Gulf Opportunity Zone Tax Credit bonds in fiscal 2012.

"We expect the authority will be able to fund their debt service
requirements for the senior-subordinate lien bonds," said Standard
& Poor's credit analyst Sarah Smaardyk.  "We also expect tourism
and convention bookings to continue to improve due to the ease of
access and competitive costs in New Orleans."

New Orleans Exhibition Hall Authority was created pursuant to Act
No. 305 of the 1978 regular session of the Louisiana Legislature.
The act, as subsequently amended, authorizes the issuance of
bonds; the levy and pledge of taxes; and the construction,
operation, and maintenance of convention center facilities in New
Orleans.  An 11-member commission that consists of eight
gubernatorial appointees and three mayoral appointees governs the
authority.


NOB HILL: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Nob Hill CLO II, Limited:

  -- US$263,700,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Notes Due 2022,
     Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/13/2009 Aaa Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$29,300,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Notes Due 2022,
     Downgraded to A2; previously on 3/4/2009 Aa1 Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$22,000,000 Class B Floating Rate Notes Due 2022,
     Downgraded to Ba1; previously on 3/4/2009 Aa2 Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$20,000,000 Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due
     2022, Downgraded to B1; previously on 3/13/2009 Downgraded to
     Ba3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$17,000,000 Class D Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due
     2022, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 3/13/2009 Downgraded to
     B3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$17,000,000 Class E Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due
     2022, Downgraded to C; previously on 3/13/2009 Downgraded to
     Caa3 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research (see Moody's Special Comment
titled "Strong Loan Issuance in Recent Years Signals Low Recovery
Prospects for Loans and Bonds of Defaulted U.S. Corporate
Issuers," dated June 2008).  Moody's has also applied
resecuritization stress factors to default probability assumptions
for structured finance asset collateral as described in the press
release titled "Moody's updates its key assumptions for rating
structured finance CDOs," published on December 11, 2008.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in the
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of all
of the Par Value Tests.  The weighted average rating factor has
steadily increased over the last year, and it is currently at 3264
versus a test level of 2500 as of the latest trustee report, dated
May 15, 2009.  Based on the same report, defaulted securities
total about $26 million accounting for roughly 6.7% of the
collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1 or lower make up
approximately 20% of the underlying portfolio.  Additionally,
interest payments on the Class C Notes, Class D Notes, and Class E
Notes are presently being deferred as a result of the failure of
the Par Value Tests.

Nob Hill CLO II, Ltd., issued on June 6, 2007, is a collateralized
loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


PACIFICA CDO: Moody's Junks Ratings on Class C-1 & C-2 Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Pacifica CDO II, Ltd.:

  -- US$210,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Notes Due 2015,
     Downgraded to Aa1; previously on July 15, 2003 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$25,000,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Notes Due 2015,
     Downgraded to A2; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa1 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$21,563,000 Class B-1 Floating Rate Notes Due 2015,
     Downgraded to Ba2; previously on March 20, 2009 Downgraded to
     Ba1;

  -- US$937,000 Class B-2 Fixed Rate Notes Due 2015, Downgraded
     to Ba2; previously on March 20, 2009 Downgraded to Ba1;

  -- US$9,000,000 Class C-1 Floating Rate Notes Due 2015,
     Downgraded to Caa2; previously on March 20, 2009 Downgraded
     to B1;

  -- US$3,000,000 Class C-2 Fixed Rate Notes Due 2015,
     Downgraded to Caa2; previously on March 20, 2009 Downgraded
     to B1;

  -- US$8,000,000 Class D Fixed Rate Notes Due 2015, Downgraded
     to C; previously on March 20, 2009 Downgraded to Caa3;

  -- US$3,000,000 Class J Blended Securities Due 2015,
     Downgraded to Baa1; previously on August 15, 2008 Upgraded to
     A2.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of the
Class C and Class D Overcollateralization Tests.  The weighted
average rating factor has steadily increased over the last year
and it is currently at 2912 versus a test level of 2275 as of the
last trustee report, dated June 1, 2009. Based on the same report,
defaulted securities total about $14 million, accounting for
roughly 5% of the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1 or
lower make up approximately 14% of the underlying portfolio.
Additionally, interest payments on the Class D Notes are presently
being deferred as a result of the failure of the Class C
Overcollateralization Test.

Pacifica CDO II, Ltd., issued in 2003, is a collateralized loan
obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


PACIFICA CDO: Moody's Junks Ratings on Three Classes of Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Pacifica CDO III, Ltd.:

  -- US$278,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Notes Due 2016,
     Downgraded to A2; previously on March 18, 2009 Aaa Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$25,000,000 Class A-2a Floating Rate Notes Due 2016,
     Downgraded to Baa3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$4,000,000 Class A-2b Fixed Rate Notes Due 2016,
     Downgraded to Baa3; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2 Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$6,000,000 Class B-1 Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due
     2016, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on March 18, 2009
     Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$5,000,000 Class B-2 Deferrable Fixed Rate Notes Due
     2016, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on March 18, 2009
     Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$15,900,000 Class C-1 Floating Rate Notes Due 2016,
     Downgraded to Caa3; previously on March 18, 2009 Downgraded
     to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$5,100,000 Class C-2 Fixed Rate Notes Due 2016,
     Downgraded to Caa3; previously on March 18, 2009 Downgraded
     to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- Class J Blended Securities Due 2016, Downgraded to Caa2;
     previously on May 28, 2004 Assigned Baa3;

  -- Class K Blended Securities Due 2016, Downgraded to Baa2;
     previously on May 28, 2004 Assigned A3;

  -- Class L Blended Securities Due 2016, Downgraded to Baa1;
     previously on May 28, 2004 Assigned A3.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed in, among
other metrics, a decline in the average credit rating (as measured
through the weighted average rating factor), an increase in the
dollar amount of defaulted securities, an increase in the
proportion of securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and
failure of the Class A, Class B, and Class C Overcollateralization
Tests.  The weighted average rating factor has steadily increased
over the last year and it is currently at 2868 versus a test level
of 2280 as of the last trustee report, dated May 3, 2009.  Based
on the same report, defaulted securities total about $15 million
accounting for roughly 4.2% of the collateral balance and
securities rated Caa1 or lower make up approximately 15.6% of the
underlying portfolio.

Pacifica CDO III, Ltd., issued in 2004, is a collateralized loan
obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


PARCS-R MASTER: S&P Downgrades Ratings on Three 2007-2 Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on three
leveraged super-senior notes issued by PARCS-R Master Trust's
series 2007-2, Starts (Cayman) Ltd.'s series 2006-1, and Starts
(Cayman) Ltd.'s series 2007-1.  At the same time, S&P placed its
ratings on four tranches issued by Khamsin Credit Products
(Netherlands) II B.V.'s series 26, 27, 29, and 30 on CreditWatch
with negative implications.

The rating actions and CreditWatch placements follow an increase
in loss assumptions for the underlying assets over the past few
months.

Loss triggers are generally based on losses that the reference
portfolios incur.  Standard & Poor's assesses the likelihood that
a tranche will breach the attachment point (credit risk) when S&P
assign a rating.

The notes issued by Khamsin Credit Products are backed by high-
grade structured finance assets, while the transactions issued by
PARCS-R Master Trust and Starts (Cayman) Ltd. are backed by
investment-grade corporate obligors.  All of these transactions
have step-up subordination features, which S&P factored into its
analysis.

                         Ratings Lowered

                      PARCS-R Master Trust
                          Series 2007-2

                                   Rating
                                   ------
              Class         To                From
              -----         --                ----
              Units         BB+               AAA

                      STARTS (Cayman) Ltd.
                          Series 2006-1

                                   Rating
                                   ------
              Class         To                From
              -----         --                ----
              Lever Sup     AA                AAA

                      STARTS (Cayman) Ltd.
                          Series 2007-1

                                   Rating
                                   ------
              Class         To                From
              -----         --                ----
              Super Sr      BBB-              AAA



              Ratings Placed On Creditwatch Negative

          Khamsin Credit Products (Netherlands) II B.V.
                            Series 26

                                   Rating
                                   ------
              Class         To                From
              -----         --                ----
              Tranche       AAA/Watch Neg     AAA

          Khamsin Credit Products (Netherlands) II B.V.
                            Series 27

                                   Rating
                                   ------
              Class         To                From
              -----         --                ----
              Tranche       AAA/Watch Neg     AAA

          Khamsin Credit Products (Netherlands) II B.V.
                            Series 29

                                   Rating
                                   ------
              Class         To                From
              -----         --                ----
              LvrdSprSr     AAA/Watch Neg     AAA

          Khamsin Credit Products (Netherlands) II B.V.
                            Series 30

                                   Rating
                                   ------
              Class         To                From
              -----         --                ----
              LvrdSprSr     AAA/Watch Neg     AAA


PPLUS TRUST: S&P Puts 'BB' Ratings on CreditWatch Negative
----------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services placed its 'BB' ratings on
PPLUS Trust Series LTD-1's $25 million class A and B certificates
on CreditWatch with negative implications.

The ratings on the certificates are dependent solely on the rating
on the underlying security, Limited Brands Inc.'s 6.95% debentures
due March 1, 2033 ('BB/Watch Neg').

The rating actions reflect the June 15, 2009, placement of the
rating on the underlying security on CreditWatch with negative
implications.


PRO RATA: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Three Classes of Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Pro Rata Funding Ltd.:

  -- US$54,000,000 Class B Floating Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes due 2013, Downgraded to Baa2; previously on
     April 16, 2009 A3 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$13,000,000 Class C Floating Rate Deferrable Subordinate
     Notes due 2013, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on April 16,
     2009 Baa2 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

  -- US$7,000,000 Class D Floating Rate Deferrable Subordinate
     Notes due 2013, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on April 16,
     2009 Ba2 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, and an increase in the proportion of
securities rated Caa1 and below.  The weighted average rating
factor has increased over the last year and it is currently at
2448 versus a test level of 2237 as of the last trustee report,
dated April 30, 2009.  Based on the same report, defaulted
securities total about $38.9 million, accounting for roughly 11%
of the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1 or lower make
up approximately 5.45% of the underlying portfolio.

Pro Rata Funding Ltd., issued on September 25, 2003, is a
synthetic collateralized loan obligation referencing primarily a
portfolio of senior secured loans.


RFMSII HOME: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 17 Tranches
------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the ratings of 17
tranches issued in three RFMSII transactions.  Underlying
securities' collateral consists primarily of closed-end second
lien residential mortgage loans and second lien home equity lines
of credit.

The ratings on the securities were monitored by evaluating factors
Moody's determined to be essential in the analysis of securities
backed by such loans.  The salient factors include; i) the nature,
sufficiency, and quality of historical loan performance
information, ii) the collateral composition and pool credit
performance including loan delinquency and loss data, iii) the
transaction's capital structure and related allocations of
collateral cash flows and losses, and iv) a comparison of current
credit enhancement levels to updated Moody's pool loss projections
based on present collateral credit performance.

Some of the securities are guaranteed by the respective financial
guarantors identified below.  The underlying ratings generally
reflect the intrinsic credit quality of the securities in the
absence of the guarantee.  The current ratings on the below --
noted securities are consistent with Moody's practice of rating
such insured securities at the higher of the guarantor's insurance
financial strength rating and the underlying or intrinsic rating.

When analyzing underlying ratings for CES and HELOC transactions,
Moody's projects cumulative losses for each deal based on a
collateral analysis of the deal's Constant Prepayment Rate and
Constant Default Rate.

CPR is based on the average of the last six months 1-month CPR.

There are two approaches for determining pool CDR.  The first
approach calculates CDR based on pool loan losses from the
previous twelve months, i.e. recent losses.  A second approach is
based on pipeline losses -- losses derived from days-aged
delinquencies and Moody's assumptions for default based on days
delinquent, in foreclosure, or liquidation, and the severity of
loss given default.  Moody's assumes 100% severity for second
liens, including both CES and HELOCs.  After the CDR is calculated
using the two methods, the effective CDR for loss projection
purposes is determined by using a weighted average of the CDRs as
determined by the recent loss and pipeline loss approaches -- with
weightings determined on a transaction by transaction basis.
Moody's assumes that the CDR will not decline for the next three
years and will decline subsequently for the life of the deal under
a schedule, typically reducing by 50% in year 4 and remaining
constant thereafter.

Based on calculated CPR and CDR, Moody's calculates projected
deal-specific cumulative losses and the weighted average life of
the deal.  The credit enhancement calculation can also include
credit for excess spread, i.e the aggregate, positive difference
in the weighted average loan coupon and the all-inclusive
securities' interest and deal fees, including servicing.  Excess
spread benefit is calculated by multiplying the stressed
annualized excess spread by the weighted average life of the deal.

Aggregate credit enhancement which combines subordination benefit
(including overcollateralization and/or reserve accounts) and
excess spread benefit is compared with projected cumulative losses
for the deal to derive coverage multiples and associated ratings
by deal tranche.  Moody's will analyze tranche coverage multiples
after consideration of timing of tranche repayment and allocation
of losses (if any).

Complete rating actions are:

Issuer: RFMSII Home Equity Loan Trust 2005-HS1

  -- Cl. A-I-2, Downgraded to B2; previously on 10/30/2008
     Downgraded to Baa1

  -- Current Underlying Rating: Downgraded to B2; previously on
     10/30/2008 Downgraded to Baa1

  -- Financial Guarantor: Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
      (Insured Rating Withdrawn on 3/25/2009)

  -- Cl. A-I-3, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 10/30/2008
     Downgraded to Baa1

  -- Current Underlying Rating: Downgraded to Caa1; previously on
     10/30/2008 Downgraded to Baa1

  -- Financial Guarantor: Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
      (Insured Rating Withdrawn on 3/25/2009)

  -- Cl. A-I-4, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 10/30/2008
     Downgraded to Baa1

  -- Current Underlying Rating: Downgraded to Caa1; previously on
     10/30/2008 Downgraded to Baa1

  -- Financial Guarantor: Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
      (Insured Rating Withdrawn on 3/25/2009)

  -- Cl. A-I-5, Downgraded to B3; previously on 10/30/2008
     Downgraded to Baa3

  -- Current Underlying Rating: Downgraded to B3; previously on
     10/30/2008 Downgraded to Baa3

  -- Financial Guarantor: Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
      (Insured Rating Withdrawn on 3/25/2009)

  -- Cl. A-II, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 3/24/2009
     Downgraded to Caa3

  -- Current Underlying Rating: Downgraded to Ca; previously on
     10/30/2008 Downgraded to Caa3

  -- Financial Guarantor: Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
      (Insured Rating Withdrawn on 3/25/2009)

Issuer: RFMSII Home Loan Trust 2005-HI2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 7/20/2005 Assigned
     A3

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 7/20/2005 Assigned
     Baa1

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Ba3; previously on 10/30/2008 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to B2; previously on 10/30/2008 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

Issuer: RFMSII Home Loan Trust 2006-HI1

  -- Cl. M-2, Downgraded to A2; previously on 4/7/2006 Assigned
     Aa2

  -- Cl. M-3, Downgraded to A3; previously on 4/7/2006 Assigned
     Aa3

  -- Cl. M-4, Downgraded to Baa1; previously on 4/7/2006 Assigned
     A1

  -- Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Baa3; previously on 4/7/2006 Assigned
     A2

  -- Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Ba2; previously on 4/7/2006 Assigned
     A3

  -- Cl. M-7, Downgraded to B1; previously on 4/7/2006 Assigned
     Baa1

  -- Cl. M-8, Downgraded to Caa1; previously on 10/30/2008 Baa2
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade

  -- Cl. M-9, Downgraded to Ca; previously on 10/30/2008 Baa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade


SKYTOP CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Two Classes of Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded and
left under review for possible downgrade the ratings of these
notes issued by Skytop CLO Ltd.:

  -- US$15,000,000 Class B Fixed Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes due 2018, Downgraded to Ba2 and Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade; previously on April 16,
     2009 A2 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$18,000,000 Class C Floating Rate Deferrable Senior
     Subordinate Notes due 2018, Downgraded to Caa1 and Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade; previously on April 16,
     2009 Baa3 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

In addition, Moody's downgraded the rating of these notes:

  -- US$2,600,000 Class Q-1 Securities due 2018, Downgraded to
     Caa3; previously on November 18, 2004 Assigned B3.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds and second lien loans will be below
their historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, and an increase in the proportion of
securities rated Caa1 and below.  The weighted average rating
factor has steadily increased over the last year and it is
currently at 2691 versus a test level of 2240 as of the last
trustee report, dated May 7, 2009.  Based on the same report,
defaulted securities total about $48.8 million, accounting for
roughly 12.8% of the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1
or lower make up approximately 12% of the underlying portfolio.

The Class B and Class C notes remain on review for possible
downgrade as a result of the additional risk posed to the
noteholders due to the action taken by Moody's on the insurance
financial strength rating of Financial Security Assurance Inc.,
which acts as guarantor under the Investment Agreement in the
transaction.  On May 20, 2009, Moody's placed the financial
strength rating of Financial Security Assurance Inc. on review for
possible downgrade.

Skytop CLO Ltd., issued on November 18, 2004, is a synthetic
collateralized loan obligation referencing primarily a portfolio
of senior secured loans.


SOUTHPORT CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Southport CLO, Limited:

  -- US$105,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Notes Due 2016,
     Downgraded to Aa2; previously on November 30, 2004 Assigned
     Aaa;

  -- US$41,300,000 Class A-3 Floating Rate Notes Due 2016,
     Downgraded to Aa3; previously on March 4, 2009 Placed Under
     Review for Possible Downgraded;

  -- US$20,500,000 Class C Floating Rate Deferrable Notes Notes
     Due 2016, Downgraded to B3; previously on March 18, 2009
     Downgraded to B1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade;

  -- US$12,300,000 Class D Floating Rate Deferrable Notes Notes
     Due 2016, Downgraded to Caa3; previously on March 18, 2009
     Downgraded to Caa2 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

  -- US$68,650,000 Class 2 Combination Notes Due 2016,
     Downgraded to B1; previously on November 30, 2004 Assigned
     Baa1;

In addition, Moody's has confirmed the rating on these notes:

  -- US$30,750,000 Class B Floating Rate Deferrable Notes Due
     2016, Confirmed at Ba1; previously on March 18, 2009
     Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed Under Review for Possible
     Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
high-yield corporate bonds, second lien loans will be below their
historical averages, consistent with Moody's research.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of Class
D Overcollateralization Ratio Test.  The weighted average rating
factor has steadily increased over the last year and it is
currently at 2848 versus a test level of 2463 as of the last
trustee report, dated May 7, 2009.  Based on the same report,
defaulted securities total about $20 million, accounting for
roughly 5.2% of the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1
or lower make up approximately 12% of the underlying portfolio.

Southport CLO, Limited, issued in November 2004, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans.


SPYGLASS TRUST: Moody's Cuts Ratings on Principal Units to 'Ba1'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded its
rating of Principal Units issued by Spyglass Trust-3.

The rating action is:

Class Description: Principal Units

  -- Current Rating: Ba1
  -- Prior Rating: A1 on review for possible downgrade
  -- Prior Rating Date: 01/30/2009

The transaction is a structured note whose rating is based on the
rating of the Notes and the legal structure of the transaction.


STRUCTURED ASSET: S&P Puts 'BB' Rating on CreditWatch Negative
--------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services placed its 'BB' rating on
Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS) Limited Brands
Inc. Debenture Backed Series 2005-3's $25 million callable units
on CreditWatch with negative implications.

The rating on the callable units is dependent solely on the rating
on the underlying security, Limited Brands Inc.'s 6.95% debentures
due March 1, 2033 ('BB/Watch Neg').

The rating action reflects the June 15, 2009, placement of the
rating on the underlying security on CreditWatch with negative
implications.


TERWIN MORTGAGE: Moody's Confirms Ratings on Class II-A-1a Tranche
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has confirmed the rating of Class II-A-
1a tranche issued in Terwin Mortgage Trust 2006-1 transaction.
Underlying securities' collateral consists primarily of closed-end
second lien residential mortgage loans and second lien home equity
lines of credit.

The ratings on the securities were monitored by evaluating factors
Moody's determined to be essential in the analysis of securities
backed by such loans.  The salient factors include; i) the nature,
sufficiency, and quality of historical loan performance
information, ii) the collateral composition and pool credit
performance including loan delinquency and loss data, iii) the
transaction's capital structure and related allocations of
collateral cash flows and losses, and iv) a comparison of current
credit enhancement levels to updated Moody's pool loss projections
based on present collateral credit performance.

When analyzing underlying ratings for CES and HELOC transactions,
Moody's projects cumulative losses for each deal based on a
collateral analysis of the deal's Constant Prepayment Rate and
Constant Default Rate.

CPR is based on the average of the last six months 1-month CPR.

There are two approaches for determining pool CDR.  The first
approach calculates CDR based on pool loan losses from the
previous twelve months, i.e. recent losses.  A second approach is
based on pipeline losses -- losses derived from days-aged
delinquencies and Moody's assumptions for default based on days
delinquent, in foreclosure, or liquidation, and the severity of
loss given default.  Moody's assumes 100% severity for second
liens, including both CES and HELOCs.  After the CDR is calculated
using the two methods, the effective CDR for loss projection
purposes is determined by using a weighted average of the CDRs as
determined by the recent loss and pipeline loss approaches -- with
weightings determined on a transaction by transaction basis.
Moody's assumes that the CDR will not decline for the next three
years and will decline subsequently for the life of the deal under
a schedule, typically reducing by 50% in year 4 and remaining
constant thereafter.

Based on calculated CPR and CDR, Moody's calculates projected
deal-specific cumulative losses and the weighted average life of
the deal.  The credit enhancement calculation can also include
credit for excess spread, i.e the aggregate, positive difference
in the weighted average loan coupon and the all-inclusive
securities' interest and deal fees, including servicing.  Excess
spread benefit is calculated by multiplying the stressed
annualized excess spread by the weighted average life of the deal.

Aggregate credit enhancement which combines subordination benefit
(including overcollateralization and/or reserve accounts) and
excess spread benefit is compared with projected cumulative losses
for the deal to derive coverage multiples and associated ratings
by deal tranche.  Moody's will analyze tranche coverage multiples
after consideration of timing of tranche repayment and allocation
of losses (if any).

Complete rating actions are:

Issuer: Terwin Mortgage Trust 2006-1

  -- Cl. II-A-1a, Confirmed at Caa3; previously on 2/26/2009 Caa3
     Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade


TEXTRON FINANCIAL: Moody's Takes Rating Actions on 2007-A Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has taken these rating actions on dealer
floorplan asset-backed notes issued by Textron Financial Floorplan
Master Note Trust, Series 2007-A:

  -- Class A Notes, Under review for possible downgrade.
     Previously on 2/20/09, downgraded to Aa3 from Aaa

  -- Class B Notes, Under review for possible downgrade.
     Previously on 2/20/09, downgraded to Ba2 from A1

                            Rationale

The review was prompted by sharply rising losses since the last
rating action in February 2009.  In the last three months,
annualized losses have ranged from 4.5% to 6.0%, considerably
higher than historical ranges of 0.25% to 1.00%.

The transaction features revolving receivables payable by dealers
and secured by the dealers' related inventory of mixed collateral
such as boats, ATVs, lawn and garden equipment, manufactured
homes, recreational vehicles, and various other asset types.  The
dealers' accounts are originated and serviced by Textron Financial
Corporation.  On December 22, 2008, TFC's parent, Textron Inc.,
announced that its Board of Directors approved a plan to exit a
portion of TFC's commercial finance business through a combination
of orderly liquidation and selected sales.  At the time of the
announcement, the plan applied to approximately $7.9 billion of
TFC's $11.4 billion managed receivable portfolio, including the
floorplan activity of Textron Financial Floorplan Master Note
Trust.

Moody's review will focus on assessing the strength of dealers and
the level of dealer defaults attendant upon TFC's exit from a
portion of its commercial finance business, the potential severity
of losses realized on the trust's portfolio of loans, and TFC's
servicing strategy considering these developments.  At the
conclusion of the review, which is typically no longer than 90
days, Moody's may downgrade the notes.

                       Rating Methodology

Moody's conducts two primary analytical methods in evaluating this
transaction.  The first method evaluates an expected loss estimate
for the floorplan collateral and variability around the loss
estimate, contemplating more stressful environments.  The judgment
of a rating committee is used to determine the variability around
the loss estimate at a level consistent with a Aaa rating, also
referred to as a Aaa Proxy, for the given trust.  After
determining an expected loss and Aaa Proxy, Moody's employs an
expected loss framework to evaluate the related bond ratings,
using a lognormal probability distribution for the asset pool's
expected loss.  Within that framework, the ratings on the
securities are assigned based on a table that shows the
relationship between the Notes' probability-weighted expected loss
and a Moody's rating.  This approach is comparable to the
methodology for retail auto loan transactions.

The second analytical method utilized, Moody's floorplan loan
model, is based on a joint-default probability analysis of both
the manufacturers and dealers.  Loss given default is determined
by analyzing the collateral at risk net of recoveries.  The total
collateral at risk upon a joint-default of manufacturer and dealer
is the remaining unpaid floorplan loan balance.  The balance is
calculated based on total payments as determined by a monthly
payment rate prior to dealer default.  The analysis is implemented
through a simulation model, which simulates losses during a two
year amortization period following an event of default based on a
set of key modeled assumptions such as manufacturer bankruptcy
scenarios, dealer default rates, recovery rates, payment rates,
the impact of macroeconomic activity on manufacturer and dealer
default probability, the correlation of default between
manufacturer and dealer, and the frequency of diversion of product
sale proceeds by the dealership ("sold out of trust").
Manufacturer and dealer default probabilities are simulated based
on committee assessment.  Each simulation run simulates a total
loss and corresponding internal rate of return reduction for each
class of Notes.

In addition to the analytical methods, Moody's also evaluates
qualitative factors such as the quality of provided information
and the strength of the servicer.  Combining the qualitative
factors and both quantitative analyses, a final rating level is
determined.

                            Servicer

The receivables and associated dealers' accounts for the Textron
Financial Floorplan Master Note Trust are serviced by TFC.  The
senior unsecured and the short term ratings of TFC and its parent
Textron are Baa3 and Prime-3.  The rating outlook is negative.


VERITAS CLO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Notes
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Veritas CLO II, Ltd.:

  -- US$196,600,000 Class A-1T First Priority Senior Secured
     Floating Rate Notes Due 2021, Downgraded to Aa1; previously
     on 6/13/2006 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$30,000,000 Class A-1R First Priority Senior Secured
     Revolving Notes Due 2021, Downgraded to Aa1; previously on
     6/13/2006 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$25,200,000 Class A-2 Second Priority Senior Secured
     Floating Rate Notes Due 2021, Downgraded to A2; previously on
     3/4/2009 Aaa Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$15,200,000 Class B Third Priority Senior Secured
     Floating Rate Notes Due 2021, Downgraded to Baa1; previously
     on 3/4/2009 Aa2 Placed Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$20,600,000 Class C Fourth Priority Mezzanine Secured
     Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Notes Due 2021, Downgraded
     to Ba2; previously on 3/17/2009 Downgraded to Ba1 and Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$10,500,000 Class D Fifth Priority Mezzanine Secured
     Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Notes Due 2021, Downgraded
     to B3; previously on 3/17/2009 Downgraded to B1 and Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$9,500,000 Class E Sixth Priority Mezzanine Secured
     Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Notes Due 2021, Downgraded
     to Ca; previously on 3/17/2009 Downgraded to Caa3 and Placed
     Under Review for Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."
Moody's analysis also reflects the expectation that recoveries for
second lien loans will be below their historical averages,
consistent with Moody's research.  Moody's has also applied
resecuritization stress factors to default probability assumptions
for structured finance asset collateral as described in the press
release titled "Moody's updates its key assumptions for rating
structured finance CDOs," published on December 11, 2008.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor), an increase in the dollar amount
of defaulted securities, an increase in the proportion of
securities from issuers rated Caa1 and below, and failure of Class
D and E Overcollateralization Tests.  The weighted average rating
factor has steadily increased over the last year and it is
currently at 2722 versus a test level of 2658 as of the last
trustee report, dated April 30, 2009.  Based on the same report,
defaulted securities total about $22 million, accounting for
roughly 6.9% of the collateral balance, and securities rated Caa1
or lower make up approximately 16.7% of the underlying portfolio.
Additionally, interest payments on the Class D Notes and Class E
Notes are presently being deferred as a result of the failure of
the Class C Overcollateralization Test on the last payment date.

Moody's also observes that the transaction is exposed to a number
of mezzanine and junior CLO tranches in the underlying portfolio.
The majority of these CLO tranches are currently assigned
speculative-grade ratings and carry depressed market valuations
that may herald poor recovery prospects in the event of default.

Veritas CLO II, Ltd., issued in June 8, 2006, is a collateralized
loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans.


WACHOVIA BANK: Fitch Puts Ratings on 2005-C22 Notes on Neg. Watch
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings places these 15 classes of Wachovia Bank Commercial
Mortgage Securities Trust commercial mortgage pass-through
certificates, series 2005-C22 on Rating Watch Negative:

  -- $152 million class A-J 'AAA';
  -- $22.2 million class B 'AA+';
  -- $31.7 million class C 'AA';
  -- $25.3 million class D 'AA-';
  -- $47.5 million class E 'A';
  -- $31.7 million class F 'A-';
  -- $28.5 million class G 'BBB+';
  -- $28.5 million class H 'BBB';
  -- $34.8 million class J 'BBB-';
  -- $15.8 million class K 'BB';
  -- $12.7 million class L 'BB-';
  -- $12.7 million class M 'B+';
  -- $6.3 million class N 'B';
  -- $6.3 million class O 'B-';
  -- $9.5 million class P 'CCC/RR1'.

The Negative Watch reflects the transfer of four loans (6.5%) to
special servicing since Fitch's last rating action in March 2009.
This brings the total number of loans in special servicing to six,
which represents 7.7% of the pool.  Three of the loans (2.5%) are
delinquent.

Two of the transfers are related to the General Growth Properties
bankruptcy.  GGP is the sponsor of the largest specially
serviced loan (1.9%), Eagle Ridge Mall, and the third largest
specially serviced loan (1.6%), Knollwood Mall.  Both loans
transferred to special servicing in April 2009 after GGP filed for
bankruptcy, and both properties were included in the filing.  At a
minimum, CMBS trusts, which include GGP loans, will incur
additional servicing fees.

Fitch expects to resolve the Negative Watch status of these
classes in the next 60 days, and will incorporate updated
information on the specially serviced loans as it becomes
available.


WACHOVIA BANK: Moody's Reviews Ratings on Nine 2007-ESH Certs.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed nine classes of Wachovia Bank
Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2007-ESH on review for possible downgrade due
to the recent filing for Chapter 11 protection by the borrower,
and the uncertainties stemming from this action.  In particular,
legal fees, special servicing fees, and extraordinary trust fund
expenses could result in interest shortfalls to the bonds.  In
addition, the potential for a "cram-down" of the mortgage exists
if the "value" presented in the filing is accepted as is, which
would result in losses to the trust.

Moody's affirmed 12 classes and downgraded eight classes on
February 25, 2009 as part of first quarter 2009 ratings sweep of
large loan and single borrower transactions.  At that time,
Moody's loan to value ratio was 113% for the trust and 205%
including mezzanine debt.  Moody's stressed debt service coverage
ratio was 1.1X for the trust, and Moody's actual DSCR (using
Moody's stressed net cash flow) was 1.9X.

The transaction is secured by first priority a floating- and
fixed-rate mortgage loans secured by 664 owned hotels and 17
hotels subject to a capital lease totaling 75,976 guestrooms, one
land parcel and one office building.  The 681 hotels operate under
five brands, and are located in 44 states and two provinces in
Canada.  The trust balance is $4.1 billion.  The borrower has
incurred additional debt in the form of mezzanine loans totaling
$3.3 billion which are held outside the trust.

The properties in the pool are classified as lower-tier extended
stay hotels by Smith Travel Research.  A typical extended stay
product offers in-room kitchenette, weekly maid service, and lower
rates compared to those of comparable full- and limited-service
hotels.  By eliminating the amenities and services typical of
traditional hotels and achieving longer guest length of stay,
extended stay hotels generate profit margins which are
significantly higher than those of both full- and limited-service
hotels.  This provides greater cushion to withstand net cash flow
declines in times of stress than transient hotels.

Smith Travel Research reports that total U.S. Revenue per
Available Room decreased by 18.2% during the first four months of
2009 over the same period in 2008.  According to Smith Travel
Research, the Preliminary May 2009 RevPAR Percent Change over May
2008 is expected to be between -20% and -22%.  Moody's anticipates
mid to high double digit RevPAR decline percent change to continue
in lodging performance for the remainder of this year.

The portfolio's RevPAR decreased 22.7% from $36.89 to $28.50 for
the first four months of 2009 over the same period in 2008.  The
portfolio's EBITA decreased 36% from $193.5 million to
$123.1 million for the first four months of 2009 over the same
period in 2008.  Moody's net cash flow at securitization was
$513.9 million.  Moody's capitalization rate was 11.0%, and this
resulted in a Moody's value of $4.7 billion.  At the time of the
first quarter 2009 ratings sweep, Moody's value was $3.6 billion
based on an estimated net cash flow of $416.0 million and an 11.5%
capitalization rate.

In the coming weeks, Moody's will continue to monitor financial
performance of the pool, the latest development in the bankruptcy
courts, and its impact on the ratings.

Moody's rating action is:

  -- Class D, $107,640,000, placed under review for possible
     downgrade; previously on February 24, 2009 affirmed Aa3

  -- Class E, $114,160,000, placed under review for possible
     downgrade; previously on February 24, 2009 downgraded to A2
     from A1

  -- Class F, $124,520,000, placed under review for possible
     downgrade; previously on February 24, 2009 downgraded to A3
     from A2

  -- Class G, $131,040,000, placed under review for possible
     downgrade; previously on February 24, 2009 downgraded to Baa2
     from Baa1

  -- Class H, $130,440,000, placed under review for possible
     downgrade; previously on February 24, 2009 downgraded to Ba1
     from Baa2

  -- Class J, $100,000,000, placed under review for possible
     downgrade; previously on February 24, 2009 downgraded to Ba2
     from Baa3

  -- Class K, $214,000,000, placed under review for possible
     downgrade; previously on February 24, 2009 downgraded to Ba3
     from Ba2

  -- Class L, $200,000,000, placed under review for possible
     downgrade; previously on February 24, 2009 downgraded to B2
     from Ba3

  -- Class M, $100,000,000, placed under review for possible
     downgrade; previously on February 24, 2009 downgraded to B3
     from B1


ZOHAR CDO: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various 2003-1 Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Zohar CDO 2003-1 Limited:

  -- US$150,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Revolving Notes due 2015, Downgraded to B1; previously on
     April 9, 2009 Downgraded to Aa2 and Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$32,000,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Delayed Drawdown Notes due 2015, Downgraded to B1; previously
     on April 9, 2009 Downgraded to Aa2 and Placed Under Review
     for Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$297,500,000 Class A-3a Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Delayed Drawdown Notes due 2015, Downgraded to Ba1;
     previously on September 18, 2008 Aaa, Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$52,500,000 Class A-3b Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Delayed Drawdown Notes due 2015, Downgraded to Caa3;
     previously on April 9, 2009 Aa2, Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the application of certain stresses with
respect to the default probabilities associated with certain
Moody's credit estimates, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs.

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor and calculated by Moody's), an
increase in the dollar amount of defaulted securities, and an
increase in the proportion of securities from issuers rated Caa1
and below.  Based on the latest trustee report, dated April 30,
2009, defaulted securities total about $50.67 million, accounting
for roughly 8.25% of the collateral balance.

In addition, the ratings on Class A-1 and A-2 Notes are based
solely on the intrinsic credit quality of the Class A-1 and A-2
Notes in the absence of the guarantee from MBIA Insurance
Corporation, whose insurance financial strength rating was
downgraded from Baa1 to B3 on February 18, 2009.  The above
actions are a result of, and are consistent with, Moody's modified
approach to rating structured finance securities wrapped by
financial guarantors as described in the press release dated
November 10, 2008, titled "Moody's modifies approach to rating
structured finance securities wrapped by financial guarantors."

Zohar CDO 2003-1 Limited, issued on November 13, 2003, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans, many of which rely on credit estimates.


ZOHAR II: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various 2005-1 Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Zohar II 2005-1, Limited:

  -- US$250,000,000 Class A-1 Notes due 2017, Downgraded to
     Ba1; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2, Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$550,000,000 Class A-2 Notes due 2017, Downgraded to
     Ba1; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2, Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$200,000,000 Class A-3 Notes due 2017, Downgraded to
     Ba1; previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2, Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the application of certain stresses with
respect to the default probabilities associated with certain
Moody's credit estimates, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor and calculated by Moody's), an
increase in the dollar amount of defaulted securities, and an
increase in the proportion of securities from issuers rated Caa1
and below.  Based on the latest trustee report, dated April 8,
2009, defaulted securities total about $199.5 million, accounting
for roughly 15.3% of the collateral balance.

In addition, the ratings on the Class A-1, A-2 and A-3 Notes are
based solely on the intrinsic credit quality of the notes in the
absence of the guarantee from MBIA Insurance Corporation, whose
insurance financial strength rating was downgraded from Baa1 to B3
on February 18, 2009.  The above actions are a result of, and are
consistent with, Moody's modified approach to rating structured
finance securities wrapped by financial guarantors as described in
the press release dated November 10, 2008, titled "Moody's
modifies approach to rating structured finance securities wrapped
by financial guarantors."

Zohar II 2005-1, Limited, issued on January 12, 2005, is a
collateralized loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of
senior secured loans, many of which rely on credit estimates.


ZOHAR III: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Various Classes of Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has downgraded the
ratings of these notes issued by Zohar III, Limited:

  -- US$200,000,000 Class A-1R Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Revolving Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to A1; previously on
     April 6, 2007 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$150,000,000 Class A-1T Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Term Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to A1; previously on April 6,
     2007 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$350,000,000 Class A-1D Floating Rate Senior Secured
     Delayed Drawdown Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to A1; previously
     on April 6, 2007 Assigned Aaa;

  -- US$200,000,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Second Priority
     Senior Secured Term Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to Baa2;
     previously on March 4, 2009 Aaa, Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade;

  -- US$116,000,000 Class A-3 Floating Rate Third Priority
     Senior Secured Term Notes Due 2019, Downgraded to Ba3;
     previously on March 4, 2009 Aa2, Placed Under Review for
     Possible Downgrade.

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are a
result of credit deterioration of the underlying portfolio.  The
actions also reflect Moody's revised assumptions with respect to
default probability, the application of certain stresses with
respect to the default probabilities associated with certain
Moody's credit estimates, the treatment of ratings on "Review for
Possible Downgrade" or with a "Negative Outlook," and the
calculation of the Diversity Score.  The revised assumptions that
have been applied to all corporate credits in the underlying
portfolio are described in the press release dated February 4,
2009, titled "Moody's updates key assumptions for rating CLOs."

Credit deterioration of the collateral pool is observed through a
decline in the average credit rating (as measured through the
weighted average rating factor and calculated by Moody's), an
increase in the dollar amount of defaulted securities, and an
increase in the proportion of securities from issuers rated Caa1
and below.  Based on the latest trustee report, dated April 30,
2009, defaulted securities total about $109.3 million, accounting
for roughly 8.3% of the collateral balance.

Zohar III, Limited, issued in April 6, 2007, is a collateralized
loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured
loans, many of which rely on credit estimates.


* Fitch Takes Various Rating Actions on 422 Bonds in 208 RMBS NIMs
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has taken various rating actions on 422 bonds in 208
U.S. RMBS net interest margin transactions.

The rating actions reflect actual pay-down performance of the NIM
securities to date and the performance of the underlying
collateral.  Essentially all of the actions are either affirming
(70%) the bond at 'C' or downgrading (30%) the bond to 'C'.  This
rating indicates that Fitch projects the bonds will not receive
enough cashflow from the underlying supporting transaction to pay
off the outstanding balance of the NIM bond.  In many instances
the underlying transaction has suffered significant losses
throughout the capital structure and there will be no additional
excess cashflow available to the NIM.

The spreadsheet also contains Fitch's Recovery Ratings for bonds
rated below 'B'.  The Recovery Rating scale is based upon the
expected relative recovery characteristics of an obligation.  For
structured finance, Recovery Ratings are designed to estimate
recoveries on a forward-looking basis while taking into account
the time value of money.


* S&P Cuts Ratings on 60 Classes of Certs. from 14 Alt-A Deals
--------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on 60
classes of mortgage pass-through certificates from 14 U.S.
Alternative-A and prime jumbo residential mortgage-backed
securities transactions issued between 2003 and 2007.  At the same
time, S&P removed 38 of the lowered ratings from CreditWatch with
negative implications.  In addition, S&P affirmed its ratings on
109 classes from six of the downgraded transactions and five
additional transactions.  S&P also removed 10 of the affirmed
ratings from CreditWatch negative.

The lowered ratings reflect the deterioration of available credit
support for the affected transactions, as well as S&P's loss
expectations based on the dollar amount of loans currently in the
delinquency pipelines of the downgraded transactions.  S&P derived
the losses for these transactions using S&P's criteria found in
the "Related Research" section.  Because the remaining pool
balances for transactions with lowered ratings are becoming
smaller, the potential losses from delinquent loans could have a
more significant impact on the credit support available for the
remaining classes.

The lowered ratings reflect S&P's belief that the amount of credit
enhancement available for the downgraded classes is not sufficient
to cover losses at the previous rating levels.  Although
cumulative losses were generally low in comparison with S&P's
projected lifetime losses for the transactions S&P reviewed, S&P
is projecting an increase in losses due to increases in
delinquencies and the current negative condition of the housing
market.  The affirmations reflect S&P's belief that there is
sufficient credit enhancement for these classes to support the
ratings at their current levels.

For the U.S. prime jumbo deals, to assess the creditworthiness of
each class, S&P reviewed the individual delinquency and loss
trends of the transaction for changes, if any, in risk
characteristics, servicing, and the expected ability to withstand
additional credit deterioration.  In order to maintain a rating
higher than 'B', S&P considered whether a class absorbed losses in
excess of the base-case assumptions S&P made in its analysis.  For
example, S&P assesses whether a class can withstand approximately
130% of S&P's base-case loss assumptions in order to maintain a
'BB' rating, while S&P consider whether a different class can
withstand approximately 160% of S&P's base-case loss assumptions
to maintain a 'BBB' rating.  An affirmed 'AAA' rating reflects
S&P's opinion that the class can withstand approximately 235% of
S&P's base-case loss assumptions.

The subordination of the more-junior classes provides credit
support for the prime jumbo transaction.  The collateral for this
transaction consists of fixed and adjustable-rate prime jumbo
mortgage loans secured by one- to four-family residential
properties.

For the Alt-A deals, to maintain an 'AAA' rating, S&P consider
whether a bond is able to withstand approximately 150% of S&P's
base-case loss assumptions, subject to individual caps and
qualitative factors assumed on specific transactions.  For a class
for which we've affirmed a 'B' rating, S&P consider whether a bond
is able to withstand S&P's base-case loss assumptions.  Other
rating categories are dispersed, approximately equally, between
these two loss assumptions.  For example, to maintain a 'BB'
rating on one class, S&P may consider whether the class is able to
withstand approximately 110% of S&P's base-case loss assumptions,
while, in connection with a different class, S&P may consider
whether it is able to withstand approximately 120% of S&P's base-
case loss assumptions to maintain a 'BBB' rating.

For the Alt-A deals, subordination of the more-junior classes
within each structure provides credit support for the affected
transactions.  The collateral backing these deals originally
consisted predominantly of Alt-A, first-lien, negative-
amortization residential mortgage loans secured byone- to four-
family properties.

S&P monitors these transactions to incorporate updated losses and
delinquency pipeline performance to assess whether, in S&P's view,
the applicable credit enhancement features are sufficient to
support the current ratings.  S&P will continue to monitor these
transactions and take additional rating actions as S&P think
appropriate.

                          Rating Actions

                Citicorp Mortgage Securities Inc.
                       Series      2005-8

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   IA-1       1729733Y3     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   IA-2       1729733Z0     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   IA-3       1729734A4     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   IA-4       1729734B2     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   IA-5       1729734C0     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   IA-6       1729734D8     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   IA-7       1729734E6     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   IA-8       1729734F3     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   IIA-1      1729734G1     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   IIA-2      1729734H9     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   IIA-3      1729734J5     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   A-PO       1729734K2     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg

                   RALI Series 2003-QS19 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS19

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class      CUSIP         To                   From
        -----      -----         --                   ----
        M-3        76110HKZ1     B                    BBB
        B-1        76110HLA5     CCC                  BB
        B-2        76110HLB3     CC                   B

                   RALI Series 2003-QS21 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS21

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A-2        76110HLK3     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   A-3        76110HLL1     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   A-5        76110HLN7     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   A-6        76110HLP2     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   A-P        76110HLQ0     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   A-V        76110HLR8     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   M-1        76110HLU1     AA                   AA/Watch Neg
   M-2        76110HLV9     A                    A/Watch Neg
   M-3        76110HLW7     CCC                  BBB/Watch Neg
   B-1        76110HLX5     CC                   BB/Watch Neg

                   RALI Series 2003-QS22 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS22

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class      CUSIP         To                   From
        -----      -----         --                   ----
        B-1        76110HNS4     CCC                  BB
        B-2        76110HNT2     CC                   B

                    RALI Series 2003-QS4 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS4

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class      CUSIP         To                   From
        -----      -----         --                   ----
        B-1        76110HAP4     CCC                  BB

                    RALI Series 2003-QS6 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS6

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class      CUSIP         To                   From
        -----      -----         --                   ----
        B-2        76110G8K0     CC                   B

                    RALI Series 2003-QS7 Trust
                       Series      2003-QS7

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class      CUSIP         To                   From
        -----      -----         --                   ----
        M-3        76110HBW8     B                    BBB
        B-1        76110HBX6     CCC                  BB
        B-2        76110HBY4     CC                   B

                    RALI Series 2003-QS8 Trust
                       Series      2003-QS8

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A-3        76110HAU3     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   M-3        76110HBF5     CCC                  BBB
   B-1        76110HBG3     CC                   BB

                    RALI Series 2006-QA8 Trust
                      Series      2006-QA8

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A-1        74922QAA0     CC                   B/Watch Neg
   A-2        74922QAB8     CC                   BBB/Watch Neg
   A-3        74922QAC6     CC                   B/Watch Neg

                    RALI Series 2007-QA5 Trust
                       Series      2007-QA5

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   I-A-1      749236AA3     CC                   B+/Watch Neg
   I-A-2      749236AB1     CC                   B/Watch Neg
   II-A-1     749236AC9     CC                   B+/Watch Neg
   II-A-2     749236AD7     CC                   B/Watch Neg
   III-A-1    749236AE5     CC                   B+/Watch Neg
   III-A-2    749236AF2     CC                   B/Watch Neg
   M-1        749236AJ4     CC                   CCC

                    RALI Series 2007-QH8 Trust
                       Series      2007-QH8

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A          74924EAA5     CCC                  AAA/Watch Neg
   X          74924EAJ6     CCC                  AAA
   P          74924EAH0     CCC                  AAA
   M-1        74924EAB3     CC                   AA/Watch Neg
   M-2        74924EAC1     CC                   A/Watch Neg
   M-3        74924EAD9     CC                   BBB/Watch Neg
   B-1        74924EAE7     CC                   BB/Watch Neg

                    RALI Series 2007-QS10 Trust
                      Series      2007-QS10

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A-1        74924DAA7     CC                   B+/Watch Neg
   A-2        74924DAB5     CC                   B/Watch Neg
   A-3        74924DAC3     CC                   B+/Watch Neg
   A-4        74924DAD1     CC                   B+/Watch Neg
   A-5        74924DAE9     CC                   B+/Watch Neg
   A-6        74924DAF6     CC                   B+/Watch Neg
   A-7        74924DAG4     CC                   B+/Watch Neg
   A-P        74924DAH2     CC                   B/Watch Neg
   A-V        74924DAJ8     CC                   B+
   M-1        74924DAL3     CC                   CCC

                   RALI Series 2007-QS11 Trust
                      Series      2007-QS11

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A-1        74925GAA9     CCC                  B+/Watch Neg
   A-2        74925GAB7     CC                   B/Watch Neg
   A-P        74925GAC5     CC                   B/Watch Neg
   A-V        74925GAD3     CCC                  B+
   M-1        74925GAG6     CC                   CCC

                STARM Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-S1
                       Series      2007-S1

                                        Rating
                                        ------
       Class      CUSIP         To                   From
       -----      -----         --                   ----
       B-1        855541AF5     CCC                  B
       B-2        855541AG3     CC                   CCC
       B-3        855541AH1     CC                   CCC

                         Ratings Affirmed

                Greenwich Capital Acceptance Inc.
                      Series      1994-ARM5

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-1        396782CW2     B
                 A-2        396782CX0     B
                 B-1        396782CY8     B
                 B-2        396782CZ5     B

                   RALI Series 2003-QS19 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS19

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-I        76110HKJ7     AAA
                 CB         76110HKK4     AAA
                 NB-1       76110HKL2     AAA
                 NB-2       76110HKM0     AAA
                 NB-3       76110HKN8     AAA
                 NB-4       76110HKP3     AAA
                 NB-5       76110HKQ1     AAA
                 NB-6       76110HKR9     AAA
                 NB-7       76110HKS7     AAA
                 A-P        76110HKT5     AAA
                 A-V        76110HKU2     AAA
                 M-1        76110HKX6     AA
                 M-2        76110HKY4     A

                   RALI Series 2003-QS22 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS22

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-1        76110HMV8     AAA
                 A-2        76110HMW6     AAA
                 A-3        76110HMX4     AAA
                 A-4        76110HMY2     AAA
                 A-5        76110HMZ9     AAA
                 A-6        76110HNA3     AAA
                 A-7        76110HNB1     AAA
                 A-11       76110HNF2     AAA
                 A-12       76110HNG0     AAA
                 A-13       76110HNH8     AAA
                 A-14       76110HNJ4     AAA
                 A-P        76110HNK1     AAA
                 A-V        76110HNL9     AAA
                 M-1        76110HNP0     AA
                 M-2        76110HNQ8     A
                 M-3        76110HNR6     BBB

                    RALI Series 2003-QS3 Trust
                       Series      2003-QS3

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-1        76110G6A4     AAA
                 A-2        76110G6B2     AAA
                 A-3        76110G6C0     AAA
                 A-4        76110G6D8     AAA
                 A-5        76110G6E6     AAA
                 A-7        76110G6G1     AAA
                 A-8        76110G6H9     AAA
                 A-P        76110G6J5     AAA
                 A-V        76110G6K2     AAA

                    RALI Series 2003-QS4 Trust
                       Series      2003-QS4

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-1        76110HAA7     AAA
                 A-2        76110HAB5     AAA
                 A-3        76110HAC3     AAA
                 A-4        76110HAD1     AAA
                 A-5        76110HAE9     AAA
                 A-6        76110HAF6     AAA
                 A-P        76110HAG4     AAA
                 A-V        76110HAH2     AAA
                 M-1        76110HAL3     AA+
                 M-2        76110HAM1     A+
                 M-3        76110HAN9     BBB

                   RALI Series 2003-QS5 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS5

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-1        76110G6U0     AAA
                 A-2        76110G6V8     AAA
                 A-3        76110G6W6     AAA
                 A-4        76110G6X4     AAA
                 A-5        76110G6Y2     AAA
                 A-6        76110G6Z9     AAA
                 A-P        76110G7A3     AAA
                 A-V        76110G7B1     AAA

                    RALI Series 2003-QS6 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS6

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-4        76110G7P0     AAA
                 A-7        76110G7S4     AAA
                 A-8        76110G7T2     AAA
                 A-13       76110G7Y1     AAA
                 A-14       76110G7Z8     AAA
                 A-15       76110G8A2     AAA
                 A-P        76110G8B0     AAA
                 A-V        76110G8C8     AAA
                 M-1        76110G8F1     AA+
                 M-2        76110G8G9     A+
                 M-3        76110G8H7     BBB+
                 B-1        76110G8J3     BB

                   RALI Series 2003-QS7 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS7

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-1        76110HBK4     AAA
                 A-2        76110HBL2     AAA
                 A-3        76110HBM0     AAA
                 A-4        76110HBN8     AAA
                 A-5        76110HBP3     AAA
                 A-P        76110HBQ1     AAA
                 A-V        76110HBR9     AAA
                 M-1        76110HBU2     AA
                 M-2        76110HBV0     A

                    RALI Series 2003-QS8 Trust
                      Series      2003-QS8

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-1        76110HAS8     AAA
                 A-2        76110HAT6     AAA
                 A-4        76110HAV1     AAA
                 A-5        76110HAW9     AAA
                 A-6        76110HAX7     AAA
                 A-7        76110HAY5     AAA
                 A-P        76110HAZ2     AAA
                 A-V        76110HBA6     AAA
                 M-1        76110HBD0     AA
                 M-2        76110HBE8     A+

                 Saxon Mortgage Securities Corp.
                       Series      1994- 2

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-11       805570DT2     AAA
                 I          805570HV3     AAA
                 A-10       805570DS4     AAA
                 M          805570DU9     AAA
                 B-1        805570DV7     AA
                 B-2        805570DW5     A-

                Travelers Mortgage Services Inc.
                       Series      1989- 1

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 1A         89419KAY9     AA


* S&P Downgrades Ratings on 17 Classes From Five RMBS Transactions
------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on 17
classes from five residential mortgage-backed securities
transactions backed by U.S. subprime mortgage loan collateral
issued between 2003 and 2007.  S&P removed seven of the lowered
ratings from CreditWatch negative.  In addition, S&P affirmed its
ratings on 59 classes from these and four additional transactions,
and removed 12 of the affirmed ratings from CreditWatch negative.

S&P derived losses for these transactions using the criteria found
in the Related Research section.

The downgrades, affirmations, and CreditWatch resolutions
incorporate S&P's current and projected losses based on the dollar
amounts of loans currently in the transactions' delinquency,
foreclosure, and real estate owned pipelines, as well as S&P's
projection of future defaults.  S&P also incorporated cumulative
losses to date in S&P's analysis when determining rating outcomes.

The lowered ratings reflect S&P's belief that the amount of credit
enhancement available for the downgraded classes is not sufficient
to cover losses at the previous rating levels.  S&P is projecting
an increase in losses due to increases in delinquencies and the
current negative condition of the housing market.

The affirmations reflect S&P's belief that there is sufficient
credit enhancement to support the ratings at their current levels.
Certain senior classes also benefit from senior-support classes
that would provide support to a certain extent before any
applicable losses could affect the super-senior certificates.
Overcollateralization, excess spread, and the subordination of
classes within each structure provide credit support for the
affected transactions.  Class A-I-5, A-I-6, A-II-A and A-II-B from
RASC Series 2003-KS5 Trust is backed by a bond insurance policy
provided by Ambac Assurance Corp. ('A' financial strength rating).

In order for transactions issued after 2004 to maintain a 'AAA'
rating, S&P considers whether a bond is able to withstand
approximately 1.5% of S&P's base-case loss assumptions, subject to
individual caps and qualitative factors assumed on specific
transactions.  For a class for which we've affirmed a 'B' rating,
S&P consider whether a bond is able to withstand S&P's base-case
loss assumptions.  Other rating categories are dispersed,
approximately equally, between these two loss assumptions.  For
example, to maintain a 'BB' rating on one class, S&P may consider
whether the class is able to withstand approximately 1.1% of S&P's
base-case loss assumptions, while, in connection with a different
class, S&P may consider whether it is able to withstand
approximately 1.2% of S&P's base-case loss assumptions to maintain
a 'BBB' rating.

In order for transactions issued prior to 2005 to maintain a 'AAA'
rating, S&P considers whether a bond is able to withstand some
multiple of S&P's base-case loss assumptions, subject to
qualitative factors assumed on specific transactions.  For a class
for which we've affirmed a 'B' rating, S&P considers whether a
bond is able to withstand S&P's base-case loss assumption.  S&P
disperses the loss assumptions for other rating categories,
approximately equally, between these two loss assumptions

The collateral backing these deals originally consisted
predominantly of subprime, fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage
loans secured by first and second liens on one- to four-family
residential properties.

S&P monitors these transactions to incorporate updated losses and
delinquency pipeline performance to assess whether, in S&P's view,
the applicable credit enhancement is sufficient to support the
current ratings.  S&P will continue to monitor these transactions
and take additional rating actions as S&P think appropriate.

                          Rating Actions

                   RAMP Series 2005-EFC6 Trust
                       Series    2005-EFC6

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class      CUSIP         To                   From
        -----      -----         --                   ----
        M-6        76112BK74     CC                   CCC

                   RASC Series 2005-AHL1 Trust
                       Series    2005-AHL1

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class      CUSIP         To                   From
        -----      -----         --                   ----
        M-6        76110W4L7     CC                   CCC


                    RASC Series 2006-KS2 Trust
                        Series    2006-KS2

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A-3        75406BAC1     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   A-4        75406BAD9     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   M-1        75406BAE7     AA+                  AA+/Watch Neg
   M-2        75406BAF4     AA+                  AA+/Watch Neg
   M-3        75406BAG2     A                    A/Watch Neg
   M-4        75406BAH0     B                    BB/Watch Neg
   M-5        75406BAJ6     CCC                  B/Watch Neg
   M-7        75406BAL1     CC                   CCC

                    RASC Series 2006-KS9 Trust
                        Series    2006-KS9

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A-I-1      75406YAA5     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   A-I-2      75406YAB3     AA                   AAA/Watch Neg
   A-I-3      75406YAC1     CCC                  A/Watch Neg
   A-I-4      75406YAD9     CCC                  B/Watch Neg
   A-II       75406YAE7     CCC                  B/Watch Neg
   M-1S       75406YAF4     CCC                  B-/Watch Neg
   M-2S       75406YAG2     CC                   CCC
   M-3S       75406YAH0     CC                   CCC
   M-4        75406YAJ6     CC                   CCC
   M-5        75406YAK3     CC                   CCC

                    RASC Series 2007-KS3 Trust
                       Series    2007-KS3

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A-I-1      74924YAA1     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   A-I-2      74924YAB9     AA                   AA/Watch Neg
   A-I-3      74924YAC7     BB                   BB/Watch Neg
   A-I-4      74924YAD5     B                    B/Watch Neg
   A-II       74924YAE3     B                    B/Watch Neg
   M-1S       74924YAF0     B-                   B-/Watch Neg
   M-4        74924YAJ2     CC                   CCC
   M-5        74924YAK9     CC                   CCC
   M-6        74924YAL7     CC                   CCC

                         Ratings Affirmed

                   RAMP Series 2005-EFC6 Trust
                       Series    2005-EFC6

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-I-2      76112BJ84     AAA
                 A-I-3      76112BJ92     AAA
                 A-II       76112BL32     AAA
                 M-1        76112BK25     AA+
                 M-2        76112BK33     BB
                 M-3        76112BK41     B
                 M-4        76112BK58     CCC
                 M-5        76112BK66     CCC

                    RASC Series 2003-KS5 Trust
                        Series    2003-KS5

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-I-5      76110WSF4     A
                 A-I-6      76110WSG2     A
                 A-II-A     76110WSJ6     A
                 A-II-B     76110WSK3     A

                   RASC Series 2005-AHL1 Trust
                       Series    2005-AHL1

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-2        76110W4D5     AAA
                 A-3        76110W4E3     AAA
                 M-1        76110W4F0     AA+
                 M-2        76110W4G8     BBB
                 M-3        76110W4H6     B
                 M-4        76110W4J2     CCC
                 M-5        76110W4K9     CCC

                    RASC Series 2006-KS2 Trust
                        Series    2006-KS2

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 M-6        75406BAK3     CCC


                    RASC Series 2006-KS4 Trust
                        Series    2006-KS4

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-2        75406EAB7     AAA
                 A-3        75406EAC5     AAA

                 A-4        75406EAD3     AAA
                 M-1        75406EAE1     AA+
                 M-2        75406EAF8     A
                 M-3        75406EAG6     BB
                 M-4        75406EAH4     B
                 M-5        75406EAJ0     CCC

                    RASC Series 2007-KS1 Trust
                       Series    2007-KS1

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-1        74924SAA4     AAA
                 A-2        74924SAB2     AAA
                 A-3        74924SAC0     AAA
                 A-4        74924SAD8     AAA
                 M-1S       74924SAE6     A
                 M-2S       74924SAF3     B
                 M-3S       74924SAG1     CCC
                 M-4        74924SAH9     CCC
                 M-5        74924SAJ5     CCC

                    RASC Series 2007-KS3 Trust
                       Series    2007-KS3

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 M-2S       74924YAG8     CCC
                 M-3S       74924YAH6     CCC

                   RASC Series 2007-KS4 Trust
                       Series    2007-KS4

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-1        74924NAA5     AAA
                 A-2        74924NAB3     AA
                 A-3        74924NAC1     BBB+
                 A-4        74924NAD9     BBB
                 M-1S       74924NAE7     B
                 M-2S       74924NAF4     CCC
                 M-3S       74924NAG2     CCC
                 M-4        74924NAH0     CCC


* S&P Downgrades Ratings on 28 Classes of Notes to 'D'
------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings to 'D' on
28 classes of notes from two cash flow and two hybrid
collateralized debt obligation transactions following the
liquidation of the collateral in their portfolios.  S&P
subsequently withdrew S&P's ratings on the transactions.

S&P lowered its ratings on the two cash flow CDO transactions to
'D' because the proceeds from the liquidations have not been
sufficient to make par payments to the rated notes.  S&P lowered
S&P's ratings on the hybrid CDO transactions to 'D' because the
transactions did not have proceeds to pay back par payments to the
noteholders after making the termination payments on the credit
default swap contracts.

The two hybrid CDOs are backed predominantly by mezzanine
residential mortgage-backed securities, and the two cash flow CDOs
are backed predominantly by high-grade and mezzanine RMBS
securities.  The deals triggered events of default, after which,
the controlling noteholders subsequently voted to accelerate the
maturity of the notes and liquidate the collateral assets.

The current rating actions follow notice from the trustees that
the liquidation of the portfolio assets is complete and that the
available proceeds have been distributed to the noteholders.

S&P subsequently withdrew the ratings because the note balances
have been reduced to zero.

                          Rating Actions

                                          Rating
                                          ------
  Deal name              Class       To    Interim  From
  ---------              -----       --    -------  ----
Athos Funding, Ltd.      Funding Nt  NR    D        CCC-/WatchNeg
Athos Funding, Ltd.      A-1         NR    D        CC
Athos Funding, Ltd.      A-2         NR    D        CC
Athos Funding, Ltd.      B           NR    D        CC
Ischus Mezzanine CDO IV  X           NR    D        B-/Watch Neg
Ischus Mezzanine CDO IV  SprSrSwap   NR    D        CCC-srs
Ischus Mezzanine CDO IV  A-1         NR    D        CC
Ischus Mezzanine CDO IV  A-2         NR    D        CC
Ischus Mezzanine CDO IV  A-3         NR    D        CC
Ischus Mezzanine CDO IV  B           NR    D        CC
Ischus Mezzanine CDO IV  C           NR    D        CC
Ischus Mezzanine CDO IV  D           NR    D        CC
Raffles Place II Ltd.    A-1M        NR    D        CC
Raffles Place II Ltd.    A-1Q        NR    D        CC
Raffles Place II Ltd.    A-2         NR    D        CC
Raffles Place II Ltd.    A-3         NR    D        CC
Raffles Place II Ltd.    A-4         NR    D        CC
Raffles Place II Ltd.    B           NR    D        CC
Raffles Place II Ltd.    C1          NR    D        CC
Raffles Place II Ltd.    C2          NR    D        CC
STACK 2006-2 Ltd.        I Unfunded  NR    D        CC
STACK 2006-2 Ltd.        I Funded    NR    D        CC
STACK 2006-2 Ltd.        II          NR    D        CC
STACK 2006-2 Ltd.        III         NR    D        CC
STACK 2006-2 Ltd.        IV          NR    D        CC
STACK 2006-2 Ltd.        V           NR    D        CC
STACK 2006-2 Ltd.        VI          NR    D        CC
STACK 2006-2 Ltd.        VII         NR    D        CC

                        NR - Not rated.


* S&P Downgrades Ratings on 81 Tranches From 31 CDO Transactions
----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on 81
tranches from 31 U.S. cash flow and hybrid collateralized debt
obligation transactions.  At the same time, S&P removed 29 of the
lowered ratings from CreditWatch with negative implications.
The ratings on 42 of the downgraded tranches are on CreditWatch
with negative implications, indicating a significant likelihood of
further downgrades.

The CDO downgrades reflect a number of factors, including credit
deterioration and recent negative rating actions on U.S. subprime
RMBS.  The CreditWatch placements primarily affect transactions
for which a significant portion of the collateral assets currently
have ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications or have
significant exposure to assets rated in the 'CCC' category.

The 81 downgraded U.S. cash flow and hybrid tranches have a total
issuance amount of $16.217 billion.  Eighteen of the 31 affected
transactions are mezzanine structured finance CDOs of asset-backed
securities, which are collateralized in large part by mezzanine
tranches of residential mortgage-backed securities and other SF
securities.  Ten of the 31 are high-grade SF CDOs of ABS that were
collateralized at origination primarily by 'AAA' through 'A' rated
tranches of RMBS and other SF securities.  The other three
transactions are CDOs of CDOs that were collateralized at
origination primarily by notes from other CDOs, as well as by
tranches from RMBS and other SF transactions.

In addition, Standard & Poor's reviewed the rating assigned to C-
Bass CBO VI Ltd. and based on the current credit support available
to the tranches, has left the ratings at their current levels.

Standard & Poor's will continue to monitor the CDO transactions it
rates and take rating actions, including CreditWatch placements,
when appropriate.

                          Rating Actions

                                                  Rating
                                                  ------
  Transaction                     Class      To             From
  -----------                     -----      --             ----
ACA ABS 2002-1, Limited         A          AA             AAA
ACA ABS 2002-1, Limited         B          CCC            BB+/Watch Neg
ACA ABS 2003-2, Limited         A-1SD      CCC/Watch Neg  BBB-/WatchNeg
ACA ABS 2003-2, Limited         A-1SU      CCC/Watch Neg  BBB-/WatchNeg
ACA ABS 2003-2, Limited         A-1SW      BB             BBB-/WatchNeg
Adirondack 2005-1, Ltd.         A-1LT-a    BB+/Watch Neg  AA/Watch Neg
Adirondack 2005-1, Ltd.         A-1LT-b    BB+/Watch Neg  AA/Watch Neg
Adirondack 2005-1, Ltd.         A-2        B/Watch Neg    A+/Watch Neg
Adirondack 2005-1, Ltd.         B          CCC+/Watch Neg BBB-/WatchNeg
Adirondack 2005-1, Ltd.         C          CCC-/Watch Neg CCC+/WatchNeg
Blue Heron Funding V Ltd        B          CC             CCC-/WatchNeg
Bristol CDO I, Ltd.             B          CCC+           B+
Davis Square Funding III Ltd    A-1LT-a    B-/Watch Neg   AA-/Watch Neg
Davis Square Funding III Ltd    A-1LT-b-1  B-/Watch Neg   AA-/Watch Neg
Davis Square Funding III Ltd    A-2        CC             B/Watch Neg
Davis Square Funding III Ltd    B          CC             CCC/Watch Neg
Diversified Asset               A-1L       A/Watch Neg    AA
Securitization Holdings III
Diversified Asset               A-2        A/Watch Neg    AA
Securitization Holdings III
Diversified Asset               A-3L       CC             BB+/Watch Neg
Securitization Holdings III
Fort Point CDO I Ltd.           A-1        BB+/Watch Neg  AA/Watch Neg
Fort Point CDO I Ltd.           A-2a       CC             CCC
Fort Point CDO I Ltd.           A-2b       CC             CCC
Fort Point CDO II Ltd.          A-1        CC             BBB/Watch Neg
Helios Series I Multi Asset CBO A          BBB+           AA+/Watch Neg
Helios Series I Multi Asset CBO B          B-             BB+/Watch Neg
Independence II CDO Ltd.        A          A-/Watch Neg   A+
Independence IV CDO, Ltd.       A-1Series1 CCC/Watch Neg  BBB/Watch Neg
Independence IV CDO, Ltd.       A-1Series2 CCC/Watch Neg  BBB/Watch Neg
Independence IV CDO, Ltd.       A-2        CC             CCC/Watch Neg
Klio Funding Ltd                A-1        B-/Watch Neg   AA+/Watch Neg
Klio Funding Ltd                A-2        CC             A+/Watch Neg
Klio Funding Ltd                B          CC             BB/Watch Neg
Klio Funding Ltd                Fund Notes B-/Watch Neg   AA+/Watch Neg
Longport Funding Ltd            A-1B       BBB+/Watch Neg A+/Watch Neg
Longport Funding Ltd            A-2-P**    BBB+/Watch Neg A+/Watch Neg
Longport Funding Ltd            A-3        CC             CCC-/WatchNeg
Longport Funding Ltd            Part. Note BB/Watch Neg   BBB/Watch Neg
Margate Funding I Ltd           A1J        BB/Watch Neg   A+/Watch Neg
Margate Funding I Ltd           A1S        A/Watch Neg    AAA/Watch Neg
Margate Funding I Ltd           A2         CCC-/Watch Neg BB-/Watch Neg
Margate Funding I Ltd           A3         CC             CCC-/WatchNeg
Oceanview CBO I, Ltd.           A-1B       CCC-           B-/Watch Neg
Oceanview CBO I, Ltd.           Comb Sec   CCC-           B-/Watch Neg
Orchid Structured Finance CDO   A-2        B+             BBB/Watch Neg
Pacific Bay CDO. Ltd.           A-2        BB+/Watch Neg  AAA/Watch Neg
Pacific Bay CDO. Ltd.           B          B/Watch Neg    BBB/Watch Neg
Pacific Bay CDO. Ltd.           C          CCC/Watch Neg  B/Watch Neg
Pacific Coast CDO Ltd.          A          BBB-/Watch Neg AAA/Watch Neg
Paragon CDO Limited             A          CCC-/Watch Neg BBB-/WatchNeg
Paragon CDO Limited             B          CC             B/Watch Neg
Paragon CDO Limited             C          CC             CCC-/WatchNeg
Paragon CDO Limited             Super Sr   BB+/Watch Neg  AA/Watch Neg
Pasadena CDO Ltd                A          AA             AAA
Pasadena CDO Ltd                B          B-             A-
Pasadena CDO Ltd                C          CC             B
Porter Square CDO II, Ltd.      A-2        BB/Watch Neg   AAA/Watch Neg
Porter Square CDO II, Ltd.      B          CCC-/Watch Neg A-/Watch Neg
Porter Square CDO II, Ltd.      C          CC             BB/Watch Neg
Porter Square CDO II, Ltd.      D          CC             CCC/Watch Neg
Silver Marlin CDO I Ltd         A-1        CC             BBB+/WatchNeg
Solstice ABS CBO II, Ltd.       A-1        BB-/Watch Neg  AA/Watch Neg
Solstice ABS CBO II, Ltd.       A-2        BB-/Watch Neg  AA/Watch Neg
Solstice ABS CBO III Ltd        A-2        BBB/Watch Neg  AAA/Watch Neg
Solstice ABS CBO III Ltd        B          CC             BB+/Watch Neg
South Coast Funding V Ltd.      A-2        A              AAA
South Coast Funding V Ltd.      A-3        A              AAA
South Coast Funding V Ltd.      B          BB+            A+/Watch Neg
South Coast Funding V Ltd.      C-1        CC             CCC+/WatchNeg
South Coast Funding V Ltd.      C-2        CC             CCC+/WatchNeg
Stone Tower CDO Ltd             A-1LA      AA/Watch Neg   AAA
Stone Tower CDO Ltd             A-1LB      A+/Watch Neg   AAA
Stone Tower CDO Ltd             A-2L       BBB+/Watch Neg AA
Stone Tower CDO Ltd             A-3L       BB+/Watch Neg  A
Stone Tower CDO Ltd             B-1L       B/Watch Neg    BBB/Watch Neg
TABS 2004-1 Ltd                 A-1        B/Watch Neg    AA/Watch Neg
TABS 2004-1 Ltd                 A-2        CC             CCC-/WatchNeg
Tremonia CDO 2005-1 PLC         A-1        B/Watch Neg    BBB/Watch Neg
Tremonia CDO 2005-1 PLC         A-2        CCC-/Watch Neg BB/Watch Neg
Tremonia CDO 2005-1 PLC         B          CC             CCC
West Trade Funding CDO III Ltd  A-1        CC             B-/Watch Neg
West Trade Funding II CDO Ltd   A-1        CC             CCC+/WatchNeg

                      Other Ratings Reviewed

    Transaction                     Class      Rating
    -----------                     -----      ------
    ACA ABS 2002-1, Limited         C          CC
    ACA ABS 2003-2, Limited         A-1J       CC
    ACA ABS 2003-2, Limited         A-2        CC
    ACA ABS 2003-2, Limited         A-3        CC
    ACA ABS 2003-2, Limited         B-F        CC
    ACA ABS 2003-2, Limited         B-V        CC
    ACA ABS 2003-2, Limited         C          CC
    Adirondack 2005-1, Ltd.         D          CC
    Adirondack 2005-1, Ltd.         E          CC
    Blue Heron Funding V Ltd        CertificateAAA
    Bristol CDO I, Ltd.             A-1        AAA
    Bristol CDO I, Ltd.             A-2        AAA
    Bristol CDO I, Ltd.             C          CC
    C-Bass CBO VI Ltd.              A          AAA
    C-Bass CBO VI Ltd.              B          AAA
    C-Bass CBO VI Ltd.              C          AAA
    C-Bass CBO VI Ltd.              D          AA
    C-Bass CBO VI Ltd.              E          A+
    Diversified Asset               B-1L       CC
     Securitization Holdings III
    Fort Point CDO I Ltd.           A-3a       CC
    Fort Point CDO I Ltd.           A-3b       CC
    Fort Point CDO I Ltd.           B          CC
    Fort Point CDO I Ltd.           C          CC
    Fort Point CDO II Ltd.          A-2        CC
    Fort Point CDO II Ltd.          A-3        CC
    Fort Point CDO II Ltd.          B          CC
    Fort Point CDO II Ltd.          C          CC
    Independence IV CDO, Ltd.       A-3        CC
    Independence IV CDO, Ltd.       B          CC
    Independence IV CDO, Ltd.       C          CC
    Longport Funding Ltd            A-1*       AAA
    Longport Funding Ltd            A-1A       AAA/Watch Neg
    Longport Funding Ltd            A-2-I*     AAA
    Longport Funding Ltd            B          CC
    Longport Funding Ltd            C          CC
    Longport Funding Ltd            D-1        CC
    Longport Funding Ltd            D-2        CC
    Margate Funding I Ltd           Combo Nts  AAA
    Margate Funding I Ltd           Income Nts CC
    Oceanview CBO I, Ltd.           A-1A       BBB
    Oceanview CBO I, Ltd.           A-2        CC
    Oceanview CBO I, Ltd.           B-F        CC
    Oceanview CBO I, Ltd.           B-V        CC
    Oceanview CBO I, Ltd.           C          CC
    Orchid Structured Finance CDO   A-1MM      AAA/A-1+
    Orchid Structured Finance CDO   B          CC
    Orchid Structured Finance CDO   C-1        CC
    Orchid Structured Finance CDO   C-2        CC
    Pacific Bay CDO. Ltd.           A-1        AAA
    Pacific Bay CDO. Ltd.           Pre Shares CC
    Pacific Coast CDO Ltd.          B          CC
    Pacific Coast CDO Ltd.          C-1        CC
    Pacific Coast CDO Ltd.          C-2        CC
    Porter Square CDO II, Ltd.      A-1        AAA
    Silver Marlin CDO I Ltd         A-2        CC
    Silver Marlin CDO I Ltd         A-3        CC
    Silver Marlin CDO I Ltd         A-4        CC
    Silver Marlin CDO I Ltd         B          CC
    Silver Marlin CDO I Ltd         C          CC
    Silver Marlin CDO I Ltd         D          CC
    Silver Marlin CDO I Ltd         E          CC
    Silver Marlin CDO I Ltd         F          CC
    Solstice ABS CBO II, Ltd.       B          CC
    Solstice ABS CBO II, Ltd.       C          CC
    Solstice ABS CBO III Ltd        A-1        AAA
    Solstice ABS CBO III Ltd        C-1        CC
    Solstice ABS CBO III Ltd        C-2        CC
    South Coast Funding V Ltd.      A-1        AAA
    TABS 2004-1 Ltd                 B          CC
    TABS 2004-1 Ltd                 C          CC
    TABS 2004-1 Ltd                 D          CC
    West Trade Funding CDO III Ltd  A-2        CC
    West Trade Funding CDO III Ltd  A-3        CC
    West Trade Funding CDO III Ltd  A-4        CC
    West Trade Funding CDO III Ltd  B          CC
    West Trade Funding CDO III Ltd  C          CC
    West Trade Funding CDO III Ltd  D          CC
    West Trade Funding CDO III Ltd  E          CC
    West Trade Funding II CDO Ltd   A-2        CC
    West Trade Funding II CDO Ltd   A-3        CC
    West Trade Funding II CDO Ltd   A-4        CC
    West Trade Funding II CDO Ltd   B          CC
    West Trade Funding II CDO Ltd   C          CC
    West Trade Funding II CDO Ltd   D          CC
    West Trade Funding II CDO Ltd   E          CC
    West Trade Funding II CDO Ltd   F          CC


* S&P Downgrades Ratings on 103 Classes From Seven RMBS Deals
-------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on 103
classes from seven residential mortgage-backed securities
transactions backed by U.S. Alternative-A and prime jumbo mortgage
loan collateral issued in 2005, 2006, and 2007.  S&P removed 71 of
the lowered ratings from CreditWatch with negative implications.
In addition, S&P affirmed its ratings on 22 classes from four of
the same transactions and removed 19 of the affirmed ratings from
CreditWatch negative.

The downgrades, affirmations, and CreditWatch resolutions
incorporate S&P's assessment of current losses as well as
projected losses based on S&P's methodology and assumptions.

The lowered ratings reflect S&P's belief that the amount of credit
enhancement available for the downgraded classes is not sufficient
to cover losses at the previous rating levels.  Although
cumulative losses were generally low in comparison to S&P's
projected lifetime losses for the transactions reviewed, S&P is
projecting an increase in losses due to increases in delinquencies
and the current negative condition of the housing market.

The affirmed ratings reflect S&P's belief that the amount of
credit enhancement available for the classes is sufficient to
cover losses associated with the existing rating levels.

For a list of publications detailing S&P's derivation of lifetime
losses for the transactions S&P reviewed, refer to the "Related
Research" section below.

S&P revised its loss projections for four transactions based on a
forward-looking default curve:

                                       Orig. bal.    Lifetime
  Transaction                          (mil. $)      exp. Loss (%)
  -----------                          --------      -------------
RFMSI Series 2007-S4
Series 2007-S4                           341.5        6.27
TBW Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-1
Series 2007-1                            739.1        22.98
Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan
Trust 2006-17XS
Series 2006-17XS                         529.5        21.65
Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan
Trust 2007-8XS
Series 2007-8XS                          580.3        29.81

To maintain an 'AAA' rating for classes in Alt-A transactions, S&P
considers whether a bond is able to withstand approximately 150%
of S&P's base-case loss assumptions, subject to individual caps
and qualitative factors assumed on specific transactions.  For a
class for which we've affirmed a 'B' rating, S&P considers whether
a bond is able to withstand S&P's base-case loss assumptions.
Other rating categories are dispersed, approximately equally,
between these two loss assumptions.  For example, to maintain a
'BB' rating on one class, S&P may consider whether the class is
able to withstand approximately 110% of S&P's base-case loss
assumptions, while, in connection with a different class, S&P may
consider whether it is able to withstand approximately 120% of
S&P's base-case loss assumptions to maintain a 'BBB' rating.

To maintain a rating higher than 'B' for prime jumbo transactions,
S&P assessed whether, in S&P's view, a class could absorb losses
in excess of the base-case loss assumptions S&P assumed in its
analysis.  For example, S&P assessed whether one class could, in
S&P's view, withstand approximately 130% of S&P's base-case loss
assumptions in order to maintain a 'BB' rating, while S&P assessed
whether a different class could withstand 155% of S&P's base-case
loss assumption to maintain a 'BBB' rating.  Each class that has
an affirmed 'AAA' rating can, in S&P's view, withstand
approximately 235% of S&P's base-case loss assumptions under S&P's
analysis.

The subordination of more-junior classes within each structure
provides credit support for the affected transactions.  Certain
senior classes also benefit from senior support classes that would
provide support, to a certain extent, before any applicable losses
could affect the super-senior certificates.  Additionally, some
structures may utilize overcollateralization and excess interest
as credit enhancement.  The collateral backing these transactions
originally consisted predominantly of fixed- or adjustable-rate,
Alt-A or prime jumbo residential mortgage loans secured by one- to
four-family properties.

S&P monitors these transactions to incorporate updated losses and
delinquency pipeline performance to assess whether the applicable
credit enhancement features, in S&P's view, are sufficient to
support the current ratings.  S&P will continue to monitor these
transactions and take additional rating actions as S&P think
appropriate.

                          Rating Actions

                 GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-1F
                          Series 2005-1F

                                     Rating
                                     ------
    Class      CUSIP         To                   From
    -----      -----         --                   ----
    1A-1       36242DUV3     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    1A-2       36242DUW1     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    1A-3       36242DUX9     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    1A-4       36242DUY7     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    1A-5       36242DUZ4     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    1A-6       36242DVA8     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    1A-7       36242DVB6     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    1A-8       36242DVC4     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    1A-9       36242DWL3     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    2A-1       36242DVD2     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    2A-2       36242DVE0     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    2A-3       36242DVF7     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    3A-1       36242DVG5     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    3A-3       36242DVJ9     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    4A-1       36242DVK6     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    A-P        36242DVN0     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    B1         36242DVP5     BBB                  AA/Watch Neg
    B2         36242DVQ3     B                    A/Watch Neg
    B3         36242DVR1     CCC                  BBB/Watch Neg
    B4         36242DVS9     CC                   BB/Watch Neg
    B5         36242DVT7     CC                   B/Watch Neg

                 GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1
                         Series 2006-AR1

                                     Rating
                                     ------
    Class      CUSIP         To                   From
    -----      -----         --                   ----
    1A1        3623413Y3     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
    1A2        3623413Z0     CCC                  AA/Watch Neg
    2A1        3623414A4     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
    2A2        3623414B2     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
    2A3        3623414C0     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
    2A4        3623414D8     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
    2A5        3623414E6     CCC                  AA/Watch Neg
    3A1        3623414F3     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
    3A2        3623414G1     CCC                  AA/Watch Neg
    B1         3623414H9     CC                   B/Watch Neg
    B2         3623414J5     CC                   CCC
    B3         3623414K2     CC                   CCC

           Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-17XS
                        Series 2006-17XS

                                     Rating
                                     ------
    Class      CUSIP         To                   From
    -----      -----         --                   ----
    A-1        61751DAA2     CC                   A/Watch Neg
    A-2-A      61751DAB0     CCC                  AAA/Watch Neg
    A-2-B      61751DAC8     CC                   B/Watch Neg
    A-2-W      61751DAD6     BBB                  BBB+
    A-3-A      61751DAE4     CCC                  AAA/Watch Neg
    A-3-B      61751DAF1     CC                   B/Watch Neg
    A-4        61751DAG9     CC                   B/Watch Neg
    A-5-W      61751DAH7     BBB                  BBB+
    A-6        61751DAJ3     CC                   B/Watch Neg
    M-1        61751DAK0     CC                   CCC
    M-2        61751DAL8     CC                   CCC
    M-3        61751DAM6     CC                   CCC
    M-4        61751DAN4     CC                   CCC
    M-5        61751DAP9     CC                   CCC
    M-6        61751DAQ7     CC                   CCC
    B-1        61751DAR5     CC                   CCC
    B-2        61751DAS3     CC                   CCC

           Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-8XS
                         Series 2007-8XS

                                     Rating
                                     ------
    Class      CUSIP         To                   From
    -----      -----         --                   ----
    A-1        61754PAA2     CCC                  AA/Watch Neg
    A-1-M      61754PBK9     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-1-W      61754PAB0     BBB                  BBB+
    A-2        61754PAC8     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-3-W      61754PAD6     BBB                  BBB+
    A-4        61754PAE4     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-5        61754PAF1     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-6        61754PAG9     CCC                  BB
    A-7        61754PAH7     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-8        61754PAJ3     CCC                  BB
    A-9        61754PAX2     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-10       61754PAY0     CCC                  BB
    A-11       61754PAZ7     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-12       61754PBA1     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-13       61754PBB9     CCC                  AA/Watch Neg
    A-14       61754PBC7     CCC                  AA
    A-15       61754PBD5     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-16       61754PBE3     CCC                  BB
    A-17       61754PBF0     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-18       61754PBG8     CCC                  BB
    A-19       61754PBH6     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-20       61754PBJ2     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    M-1        61754PAK0     CC                   CCC
    M-2        61754PAL8     CC                   CCC
    M-3        61754PAM6     CC                   CCC
    M-4        61754PAN4     CC                   CCC
    M-5        61754PAP9     CC                   CCC
    M-6        61754PAQ7     CC                   CCC
    B-1        61754PAR5     CC                   CCC
    B-3        61754PAT1     D                    CC

                    RFMSI Series 2006-S2 Trust
                          Series 2006-S2

                                     Rating
                                     ------
    Class      CUSIP         To                   From
    -----      -----         --                   ----
    A-1        76111XL76     A                    AAA/Watch Neg
    A-2        76111XL84     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-3        76111XL92     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-4        76111XM26     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    A-5        76111XM34     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-6        76111XM42     A                    AAA/Watch Neg
    A-7        76111XM59     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-P        76111XM67     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-V        76111XM75     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg

                    RFMSI Series 2007-S4 Trust
                          Series 2007-S4

                                     Rating
                                     ------
    Class      CUSIP         To                   From
    -----      -----         --                   ----
    A-1        74958YAA0     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-2        74958YAB8     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-3        74958YAC6     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-4        74958YAD4     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-5        74958YAE2     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-6        74958YAF9     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-8        74958YAH5     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-9        74958YAJ1     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-10       74958YAK8     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-11       74958YAL6     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-12       74958YAM4     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-13       74958YBA9     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-14       74958YAN2     B                    AA/Watch Neg
    A-15       74958YAP7     CCC                  AA/Watch Neg
    A-P        74958YAQ5     CCC                  BB/Watch Neg
    A-V        74958YAR3     B                    AA/Watch Neg

                 TBW Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-1
                          Series 2007-1

                                     Rating
                                     ------
    Class      CUSIP         To                   From
    -----      -----         --                   ----
    A-1        87222EAA6     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
    A-2        87222EAB4     CCC                  AAA/Watch Neg
    A-3        87222EAC2     CCC                  AA-/Watch Neg
    A-4        87222EAD0     CC                   A/Watch Neg
    A-5        87222EAE8     CCC                  BBB/Watch Neg
    A-6        87222EAF5     CC                   BBB/Watch Neg
    A-7A       87222EAG3     BBB                  BBB+
    A-7B       87222EAW8     CC                   BBB/Watch Neg
    A-8        87222EAH1     CC                   BBB/Watch Neg
    M-1        87222EAJ7     CC                   BB+/Watch Neg
    M-2        87222EAK4     CC                   BB/Watch Neg
    M-3        87222EAL2     CC                   B+/Watch Neg
    M-4        87222EAM0     CC                   B/Watch Neg
    M-5        87222EAN8     CC                   B-/Watch Neg
    M-6        87222EAP3     CC                   CCC
    M-7        87222EAQ1     CC                   CCC
    M-8        87222EAR9     CC                   CCC

                         Ratings Affirmed

                 GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-1F
                          Series 2005-1F

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 3A-2       36242DVH3     AAA
                 4A-2       36242DVL4     AAA
                 A-X        36242DVM2     AAA


* S&P Downgrades Ratings on 218 Classes From Nine Prime Jumbo RMBS
------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on 218
classes from nine U.S. prime jumbo and Alternative-A residential
mortgage-backed securities transactions issued from 2004 to 2007.
S&P removed 138 of the lowered ratings from CreditWatch with
negative implications.  Additionally, S&P affirmed its ratings on
71 classes from four of the transactions and removed 15 of the
affirmed ratings from CreditWatch negative.

The downgrades, affirmations, and CreditWatch resolutions
incorporate S&P's current and projected losses based on the dollar
amounts of loans currently in the transactions' delinquency,
foreclosure, and real estate owned pipelines, as well as S&P's
projection of future defaults.  S&P also incorporated cumulative
losses to date in S&P's analysis when assessing rating outcomes.

For information on how S&P derives its loss assumptions, S&P's use
of loss curve forecasting methodology, and how S&P incorporate
each transaction's current delinquency (including 60- and 90-day
delinquencies), default, and loss trends into S&P's analysis,
please see the articles list in the Related Research section
below.

As part of S&P's analysis, S&P considered the characteristics of
the underlying mortgage collateral as well as macroeconomic
influences.  For example, S&P's assessment of the risk profile of
the underlying mortgage pools influences S&P's default
projections, while S&P's outlook for housing price declines and
the health of the housing market influence S&P's loss severity
assumptions.  Furthermore, for each deal, S&P adjusted its loss
expectations based on upward trends in delinquencies.

Standard & Poor's has established loss projections for each prime
jumbo and Alt-A transaction rated in 2005, 2006, and 2007 based on
a forward-looking default curve.  S&P's lifetime projected losses
for transactions in this release for which the loss projections
have changed are:

                                         Original        Loss
  Transaction                            bal. (mil. $)   proj. (%)
  -----------                            -------------   ---------
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-WF2    1,115.6         20.70%
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage
Securities Corp 2005-7                   315.4           1.70%
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage
Securities Corp 2005-7                   190.6           3.57%
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage
Securities Corp 2005-7                   301.5           0.47%

To maintain an 'AAA' rating, S&P consider whether a class in an
Alt-A transaction is able to withstand approximately 150% of S&P's
base-case loss assumptions, subject to individual caps and
qualitative factors assumed on specific transactions.  For a class
for which we've affirmed a 'B' rating, S&P considers whether a
bond is able to withstand S&P's base-case loss assumption.  Other
rating categories are dispersed, approximately equally, between
these two loss assumptions.  For example, to maintain a 'BB'
rating on one class, S&P may consider whether the class is able to
withstand approximately 110% of S&P's base-case loss assumptions,
while, in connection with a different class, S&P may consider
whether it is able to withstand approximately 120% of S&P's base-
case loss assumptions to maintain a 'BBB' rating.

For prime jumbo transactions, a class may have to withstand
approximately 127% of S&P's base-case loss assumptions in order to
maintain a 'BB' rating, while a different class may have to
withstand approximately 154% of S&P's base-case loss assumptions
to maintain a 'BBB' rating.  An affirmed 'AAA' rating reflects
S&P's opinion that the class can withstand approximately 235% of
S&P's base-case loss assumptions.

The lowered ratings reflect S&P's belief that the amount of credit
enhancement available for the downgraded classes is not sufficient
to cover losses at the previous rating levels, given S&P's current
projected losses.

The affirmations reflect S&P's belief that there is sufficient
credit enhancement to support the ratings at their current levels.
Certain senior classes also benefit from senior-support classes
that would provide support to a certain extent before any
applicable losses could affect the super-senior certificates.  The
subordination of classes within each structure provides credit
support for the affected transactions.

The collateral backing these deals originally consisted
predominantly of either Alt-A, first-lien, fixed-rate, adjustable-
rate, or negative-amortization residential mortgage loans or prime
jumbo fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by one- to
four-family properties.

S&P monitors these transactions to incorporate updated losses and
delinquency pipeline performance to assess whether, in S&P's view,
the applicable credit enhancement features are sufficient to
support the current ratings.  S&P will continue to monitor these
transactions and take additional rating actions as S&P deem
appropriate.

                          Rating Actions

               Banc of America Funding 2005-5 Trust
                          Series 2005-5

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   1-A-1      05946XD34     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-2      05946XD42     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-3      05946XD59     BBB                  AAA
   1-A-4      05946XD67     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-5      05946XD75     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-6      05946XD83     BBB                  AAA
   1-A-7      05946XD91     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-8      05946XE25     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-9      05946XE33     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-10     05946XE41     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-11     05946XE58     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   2-A-1      05946XE74     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   2-A-2      05946XE82     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   3-A-1      05946XE90     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   3-A-2      05946XF24     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   3-A-3      05946XF32     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   3-A-4      05946XF40     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   3-A-5      05946XF57     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   3-A-6      05946XF65     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   3-A-7      05946XF73     BBB                  AAA
   3-A-8      05946XF81     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   30-PO      05946XG23     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   B-1        05946XG31     CCC                  AA/Watch Neg
   B-2        05946XG49     CC                   A/Watch Neg
   B-3        05946XG56     CC                   BBB/Watch Neg
   B-4        05946XG64     CC                   BB/Watch Neg
   B-5        05946XG72     CC                   B/Watch Neg

               Banc of America Funding 2006-3 Trust
                          Series 2006-3

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   1-A-1      058931AB2     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-2      058931AC0     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   2-A-1      058931AD8     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   2-A-2      058931AE6     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   3-A-1      058931AF3     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   3-A-2      058931AG1     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-1      058931AH9     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-2      058931AJ5     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-3      058931AK2     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-4      058931AL0     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-5      058931AM8     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-6      058931AN6     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-7      058931AP1     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-8      058931AQ9     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-9      058931AR7     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-10     058931AS5     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-11     058931AT3     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-12     058931AU0     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-13     058931AV8     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-14     058931AW6     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-15     058931AX4     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-16     058931AY2     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-17     058931AZ9     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-18     058931BA3     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-19     058931BB1     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   4-A-20     058931BC9     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   5-A-1      058931BD7     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   5-A-2      058931BE5     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   5-A-3      058931BF2     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   5-A-4      058931BG0     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   5-A-5      058931BH8     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   5-A-6      058931BJ4     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   5-A-7      058931BK1     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   5-A-8      058931BL9     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   5-A-9      058931BM7     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   X-IO       058931BP0     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   X-PO       058931BQ8     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   6-A-1      058931BN5     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   M          058931BR6     CCC                  AA/Watch Neg

              Banc of America Mortgage Trust 2004-7
                          Series 2004-7

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class      CUSIP         To                   From
        -----      -----         --                   ----
        3-A-1      05949AQD5     AA                   AAA
        6-A-1      05949APN4     AA                   AAA
        6-A-2      05949APP9     AA                   AAA
        6-A-3      05949APQ7     AA                   AAA
        7-A-1      05949APR5     AA                   AAA
        X-B-1      05949APS3     BB                   AA
        15-B-1     05949AQP8     B                    AA
        X-B-2      05949APT1     CCC                  A
        15-B-2     05949AQQ6     CCC                  A
        X-B-3      05949APU8     CCC                  BBB
        15-B-3     05949AQR4     CC                   BBB
        X-B-4      05949APV6     CC                   B
        15-B-4     05949AQV5     CC                   BB
        X-B-5      05949APW4     CC                   CCC
        15-B-5     05949AQW3     CC                   B

             CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-24
                          Series 2005-24

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A-1        126694JR0     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-2        126694JS8     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-3        126694JT6     AA                   AAA/Watch Neg
   A-4        126694JU3     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-5        126694JV1     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-7        126694JX7     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-8        126694JY5     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-9        126694JZ2     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-10       126694KA5     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-11       126694KB3     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-12       126694KC1     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-13       126694KD9     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-14       126694KE7     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-15       126694KF4     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-16       126694KG2     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-17       126694KH0     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-18       126694KJ6     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-19       126694KK3     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-20       126694KL1     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-21       126694KM9     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-22       126694KN7     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-23       126694KP2     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-24       126694KQ0     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-25       126694KR8     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-26       126694KS6     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-27       126694KT4     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-28       126694KU1     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-29       126694KV9     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-30       126694KW7     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-31       126694KX5     B                    AAA
   A-32       126694KY3     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-33       126694KZ0     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-34       126694LA4     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-35       126694LB2     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-36       126694LC0     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-37       126694LD8     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-38       126694LE6     AA                   AAA/Watch Neg
   A-39       126694LF3     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   A-40       126694LG1     B                    AAA
   A-41       126694LH9     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   PO         126694LJ5     B                    AAA/Watch Neg

             CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-J3
                          Series 2005-J3

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   1-A-1      12669G4J7     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-2      12669G4K4     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-3      12669G4L2     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-4      12669G4M0     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-5      12669G4N8     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-6      12669G4P3     AA                   AAA/Watch Neg
   1-A-7      12669G4Q1     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   2-A-1      12669G4S7     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   2-A-2      12669G4T5     BBB                  AAA
   2-A-3      12669G4U2     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   2-A-4      12669G4V0     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   2-A-5      12669G4W8     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   2-A-6      12669G4X6     AA                   AAA/Watch Neg
   2-A-7      12669G4Y4     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg
   X          12669G4Z1     AA                   AAA
   PO         12669G5A5     BBB                  AAA/Watch Neg

             CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-14
                          Series 2007-14

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class      CUSIP         To                   From
        -----      -----         --                   ----
        A-1        12544DAA7     BBB                  AAA
        A-2        12544DAB5     BBB                  AAA
        A-3        12544DAC3     CCC                  BBB
        A-4        12544DAD1     AA                   AAA
        A-5        12544DAE9     BBB                  AAA
        A-6        12544DAF6     BBB                  AAA
        A-7        12544DAG4     BBB                  AAA
        A-8        12544DAH2     BBB                  AAA
        A-9        12544DAJ8     CCC                  BBB
        A-10       12544DAK5     BBB                  AAA
        A-11       12544DAL3     CCC                  BBB
        A-12       12544DAM1     BBB                  A
        A-14       12544DAP4     CCC                  BBB
        A-15       12544DAQ2     BBB                  AAA
        A-16       12544DAR0     BBB                  AAA
        A-17       12544DAS8     BBB                  AAA
        A-18       12544DAT6     BBB                  AAA
        A-19       12544DAU3     CCC                  BBB
        A-20       12544DAV1     BBB                  AAA
        A-21       12544DAW9     CCC                  BBB
        A-22       12544DAX7     CCC                  BBB
        A-23       12544DAY5     BBB                  AAA
        PO         12544DAZ2     CCC                  BBB

              Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-WF2
                         Series 2006-WF2

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   A-1        17309BAL1     CCC                  B/Watch Neg
   A-2B       17309BAA5     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   A-2C       17309BAB3     CCC                  B/Watch Neg
   A-2D       17309BAC1     CCC                  B/Watch Neg
   A-2E       17309BAD9     CCC                  B/Watch Neg
   A-2F       17309BAE7     CCC                  B/Watch Neg
   M-1        17309BAF4     CC                   CCC
   M-2        17309BAG2     CC                   CCC

       Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.
                          Series 2005-7

                                    Rating
                                    ------
   Class      CUSIP         To                   From
   -----      -----         --                   ----
   I-A-1      225458E46     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-2      225458E53     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-3      225458E61     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-4      225458E79     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-5      225458E87     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-6      225458E95     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-7      225458F29     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-8      225458F37     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-9      225458L48     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-10     225458L55     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-11     225458L63     BB                   AAA/Watch Neg
   I-A-12     225458L71     BB                   AAA
   A-P        225458H35     BB                   AAA
   V-A-1      225458G69     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   VI-A-1     225458G77     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   C-P        225458H43     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   II-A-1     225458F45     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   II-A-2     225458F52     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   II-A-3     225458F60     B                    AAA
   II-A-4     225458F78     AAA                  AAA/Watch Neg
   II-A-5     225458F86     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   II-A-6     225458F94     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   III-A-1    225458G28     B                    AAA/Watch Neg
   I-B-1      225458J33     CCC                  AA/Watch Neg
   D-B-1      225458H84     CCC                  A/Watch Neg
   I-B-2      225458J41     CC                   A/Watch Neg
   C-B-2      225458H68     CCC                  A/Watch Neg
   D-B-2      225458H92     CC                   BB/Watch Neg
   I-B-3      225458J58     CC                   BB/Watch Neg
   C-B-3      225458H76     CC                   BBB/Watch Neg
   D-B-3      225458J25     CC                   B/Watch Neg
   I-B-4      225458K31     CC                   B/Watch Neg
   C-B-4      225458K98     CC                   BB/Watch Neg
   C-B-5      225458L22     CC                   B/Watch Neg

                 JPMorgan Mortgage Trust 2007-S2
                         Series 2007-S2

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class      CUSIP         To                   From
        -----      -----         --                   ----
        1-A-1      46630WAA8     CC                   B
        1-A-3      46630WAC4     CC                   B
        1-A-4      46630WAD2     BBB                  AAA
        1-A-5      46630WAE0     BBB                  AAA
        1-A-7      46630WAG5     CC                   B
        1-A-8      46630WAH3     B                    AAA
        1-A-2      46630WAB6     B                    BBB
        1-A-9      46630WAJ9     BB                   AAA
        1-A-10     46630WAK6     CC                   B
        1-A-11     46630WAL4     BB                   AAA
        1-A-12     46630WAM2     CC                   B
        1-A-13     46630WAN0     CC                   B
        1-A-14     46630WAP5     CC                   B
        1-A-15     46630WAQ3     CC                   B
        1-A-16     46630WAR1     CC                   B
        1-A-17     46630WAS9     CC                   B
        1-A-18     46630WBP4     CC                   B
        2-A-1      46630WAT7     CC                   B
        2-A-2      46630WAU4     CC                   B
        2-A-3      46630WAV2     CC                   B
        2-A-4      46630WAW0     CC                   B
        2-A-5      46630WAX8     CC                   B
        2-A-6      46630WAY6     CC                   B
        2-A-7      46630WAZ3     CC                   B
        3-A-1      46630WBA7     CC                   B
        3-A-2      46630WBB5     CC                   B
        3-A-3      46630WBC3     CC                   B
        A-P        46630WBD1     CC                   B
        A-X        46630WBE9     BBB                  AAA
        P          46630WBN9     CC                   AAA

                         Ratings Affirmed

               Banc of America Funding 2005-5 Trust
                          Series 2005-5

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 30-IO      05946XF99     AAA

              Banc of America Mortgage Trust 2004-7
                          Series 2004-7

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 1-A-5      05949ANE6     AAA
                 1-A-6      05949ANF3     AAA
                 1-A-12     05949ANM8     AAA
                 1-A-14     05949ANP1     AAA
                 1-A-15     05949ANQ9     AAA
                 1-A-16     05949ANR7     AAA
                 1-A-17     05949ANS5     AAA
                 1-A-18     05949ANT3     AAA
                 1-A-19     05949ANU0     AAA
                 5-A-1      05949AQF0     AAA
                 5-A-2      05949ANX4     AAA
                 5-A-3      05949ANY2     AAA
                 5-A-4      05949ANZ9     AAA
                 5-A-5      05949APA2     AAA
                 5-A-6      05949APB0     AAA
                 5-A-7      05949APC8     AAA
                 5-A-8      05949APD6     AAA
                 5-A-9      05949APE4     AAA
                 5-A-10     05949APF1     AAA
                 5-A-11     05949APG9     AAA
                 5-A-12     05949APH7     AAA
                 5-A-13     05949APJ3     AAA
                 5-A-14     05949APK0     AAA
                 5-A-15     05949APL8     AAA
                 5-A-16     05949APM6     AAA
                 1-30-IO                  AAA
                 5-30-IO                  AAA
                 1-X-PO                   AAA
                 5-X-PO                   AAA
                 2-A-1      05949AQB9     AAA
                 2-A-2      05949AQC7     AAA
                 2-A-3      05949ANV8     AAA
                 2-A-4      05949ANW6     AAA
                 4-A-1      05949AQE3     AAA
                 2-30-IO                  AAA
                 4-30-IO                  AAA
                 2-X-PO                   AAA
                 4-X-PO                   AAA
                 4-15-PO                  AAA
                 3-15-IO                  AAA
                 6-15-IO                  AAA
                 7-15-IO                  AAA
                 3-X-PO                   AAA
                 6-X-PO                   AAA
                 7-X-PO                   AAA
                 3-15-PO                  AAA
                 6-15-PO                  AAA
                 7-15-PO                  AAA

             CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-14
                         Series 2007-14

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 A-13       12544DAN9     BBB

       Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.
                          Series 2005-7

                 Class      CUSIP         Rating
                 -----      -----         ------
                 I-X        225458G85     AAA
                 IV-A-1     225458G36     AAA
                 IV-A-2     225458G44     AAA
                 IV-A-3     225458G51     AAA
                 C-X        225458H27     AAA
                 II-X       225458G93     AAA


* S&P Downgrades Ratings on Four Tranches From Two CDO Deals
------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on four
tranches from two U.S. market value collateralized debt obligation
transactions.  S&P placed one of these ratings on CreditWatch
negative and three remain on CreditWatch negative.  At the same
time, S&P placed its ratings on five tranches from two
transactions on CreditWatch negative.  S&P also removed nine
ratings on two transactions from CreditWatch negative.  At the
same time, S&P affirmed its ratings on 43 tranches from eight
deals.  S&P also withdrew seven ratings from two deals due to
class paydowns.

The CreditWatch removals reflect several months of stable or
improving overcollateralization test results for these classes due
to paydowns to the senior notes.  S&P affirmed the corresponding
senior class ratings in these transactions.

The CreditWatch placements primarily affected deals that were
coming close to breaching their O/C test levels due to price
deterioration in the leveraged loan and high-yield bond markets.

S&P withdrew seven ratings on tranches that had paid down in full.

S&P will continue to monitor these transactions.  S&P will take
negative rating actions as appropriate if S&P see further declines
in the O/C levels, and S&P will remove the ratings from
CreditWatch if the tranches reestablish an appropriate cushion
above the minimum O/C requirement.

                          Rating Actions

                                                Rating
                                                ------
  Transaction                  Class       To              From
  -----------                  -----       --              ----
BlackRock Senior Income
Series III                    B           BB/Watch Neg    BBB+/Watch Neg
BlackRock Senior Income
Series III                    C           CCC-/Watch Neg  CCC-
Geer Mountain Financing Ltd.   B-1         AA              AA/Watch Neg
McDonnell Loan Opportunity
Ltd.                          MzTmLn06-1  A/Watch Neg     A
McDonnell Loan Opportunity
Ltd.                          C-1 2006-1  A/Watch Neg     A
McDonnell Loan Opportunity
Ltd.                          C-2 2006-2  A/Watch Neg     A
McDonnell Loan Opportunity
Ltd.                          MzTmLN06-2  A/Watch Neg     A
OHSF Financing Ltd.            D-1 2006    BBB             BBB/Watch Neg
OHSF Financing Ltd.            D-2 2006    BBB             BBB/Watch Neg
OHSF II Financing Ltd.         D-1 2006    BBB             BBB/Watch Neg
P.A.R.A.D.I.S.O. Trust II S.A. Notes       B               B/Watch Neg
Prospect Funding I LLC         B-2         CCC/Watch Neg   B/Watch Neg
Prospect Funding I LLC         C-1         CCC-/Watch Neg  CCC
Prospect Funding I LLC         SecCredAgr  CCC/Watch Neg   B/Watch Neg
Sankaty High Yield Partners II
L.P.                          A-1 Fixed   NR              AAA
Sankaty High Yield Partners II
L.P.                          Cr Fac      NR              AAA
Sankaty High Yield Partners II
L.P.                          A-1 Float   NR              AAA
Sankaty High Yield Partners II
L.P.                          A-2 Fixed   AA              AA/Watch Neg
Sankaty High Yield Partners II
L.P.                          A-2 Float   AA              AA/Watch Neg
Sankaty High Yield Partners
III                           A-1         NR              AAA
Sankaty High Yield Partners
III                           A-2         A               A/Watch Neg
Sankaty High Yield Partners
III                           A-1A        NR              AAA
Sankaty High Yield Partners
III                           A-1B        NR              AAA
Sankaty High Yield Partners
III                           A-1C        NR              AAA
Sankaty High Yield Partners
III                           Sr Sec Ln   A               A/Watch Neg

                      Other Ratings Reviewed

     Transaction                    Class       Rating
     -----------                    -----       ------
     BlackRock Senior Income
      Series III                    Sr Sec Fac  AAA
     BlackRock Senior Income
      Series III                    D           CC
     BlackRock Senior Income
      Series III                    E           CC
     Geer Mountain Financing Ltd.   A-1         AAA
     Geer Mountain Financing Ltd.   A-2         AAA
     Highland Credit Opportunities
      CDO Ltd.                      A-1 2006    A
     Highland Credit Opportunities
      CDO Ltd.                      A-2 2006    A
     Highland Credit Opportunities
      CDO Ltd.                      B 2006      BBB
     Highland Credit Opportunities
      CDO Ltd.                      C 2006      BB/Watch Neg
     McDonnell Loan Opportunity
      Ltd.                          A-1 2006-1  AAA
     McDonnell Loan Opportunity
      Ltd.                          A-2 2006-1  AAA
     McDonnell Loan Opportunity
      Ltd.                          A-3 2006-1  AAA
     McDonnell Loan Opportunity
      Ltd.                          2SrTmL06-1  AA
     McDonnell Loan Opportunity
      Ltd.                          A-5 2006-2  AAA
     McDonnell Loan Opportunity
      Ltd.                          A-6 2006-2  AAA
     McDonnell Loan Opportunity
      Ltd.                          A-7 2006-2  AAA
     McDonnell Loan Opportunity
      Ltd.                          B-1 2006-2  AA
     McDonnell Loan Opportunity
      Ltd.                          2dSrLn06-2  AA
     OHSF Financing Ltd.            A-1 2006    AAA
     OHSF Financing Ltd.            Sr Rev Ln   AA
     OHSF Financing Ltd.            B-1 2006    AA
     OHSF Financing Ltd.            C-1 2006    A
     OHSF Financing Ltd.            C-2 2006    A
     OHSF II Financing Ltd.         A-1 2006    AAA
     OHSF II Financing Ltd.         A-2a 2006   AAA
     OHSF II Financing Ltd.         A-2b 2006   AAA
     OHSF II Financing Ltd.         STL 2006    AAA
     OHSF II Financing Ltd.         B-1 2006    AA
     OHSF II Financing Ltd.         SSTL 2006   AA
     OHSF II Financing Ltd.         C-1 2006    A
     OHSF II Financing Ltd.         C-2 2006    A
     OHSF II Financing Ltd.         MTL 2006    A
     Prospect Funding I LLC         A-2         BB/Watch Neg
     Prospect Funding I LLC         A-3         BB/Watch Neg
     Prospect Funding I LLC         A-5A        BB/Watch Neg
     Prospect Funding I LLC         A-5B        BB/Watch Neg
     Prospect Funding I LLC         A-6         BB/Watch Neg
     Prospect Funding I LLC         A-7         BB/Watch Neg
     Prospect Funding I LLC         D-1         CC
     Prospect Funding I LLC         D-2         CC
     Sankaty High Yield Partners II
      L.P.                          B Fixed     BB/Watch Neg
     Sankaty High Yield Partners II
      L.P.                          B Float     BB/Watch Neg
     Sankaty High Yield Partners II
      L.P.                          C Fixed     CCC-
     Sankaty High Yield Partners II
      L.P.                          C Float     CCC-
     Sankaty High Yield Partners II
      L.P.                          D Fixed     CCC-
     Sankaty High Yield Partners II
      L.P.                          D Float     CCC-
     Sankaty High Yield Partners II
      L.P.                          E Float     CC
     Sankaty High Yield Partners
      III                           B           B/Watch Neg
     Sankaty High Yield Partners
      III                           B           B/Watch Neg
     Sankaty High Yield Partners
      III                           C           CCC
     Sankaty High Yield Partners
      III                           C           CCC
     Sankaty High Yield Partners
      III                           D           CCC-
     Sankaty High Yield Partners
      III                           D           CCC-
     Sankaty High Yield Partners
      III                           E           CC


* S&P Downgrades Ratings on Littlefield, Texas' Debt to 'B'
-----------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has lowered its long-term
rating and Standard & Poor's underlying rating on Littlefield,
Texas' general obligation debt to 'B' from 'BB', reflecting the
city's increased vulnerability to nonpayment of the obligation.
The outlook is negative.

"The downgrade reflects our assessment of the city's fiscal stress
associated with the operation of the detention center; and
limited, though stable, local economy and property tax base," said
Standard & Poor's credit analyst James Breeding.  Also reflected
in the ratings are the city's historically weak financial
performance with low general fund reserves; and high debt levels
that are historically offset by contract revenues, which, in the
past, have provided significant debt service support.

The outlook reflects S&P's concerns regarding the viability of the
Bill Clayton Detention Center.  The former operator, GEO Corp.,
and former tenant, Idaho Department of Corrections, vacated the
facility in January 2009.  The city is trying to either sell the
facility, or contract with another private operator that can use
it.  With the high degree of uncertainty regarding the facility's
use, there is the potential for further rating deterioration as
the city's general fund and tax base would not likely be able to
support the debt service requirement without causing severe
financial distress to the city.

The negative outlook reflects the lack of a contract for operating
and occupying the detention center.  The city's ability to cover
the debt service without revenue from the facility is unlikely
over the long term.  Short-term support may be possible, but not
sustainable.  S&P could lower the rating if the facility remains
vacant for a prolonged period of time and management draws upon
the debt service reserve fund.


* S&P Puts Ratings on 52 Classes on CreditWatch Negative
--------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services placed its ratings on 52
classes from various small business securitizations originated in
2005, 2006, and 2007 on CreditWatch with negative implications.
The CreditWatch placements, which affect 12% of S&P's rated
outstanding small business loan securitization debt, follow S&P's
review of all outstanding 48 small business securitizations.  The
reviewed transactions were issued between 2002 and 2007.

Credit performance for several Lehman Bros. Small Balance
Commercial Loan Trusts, Business Loan Express Business Loan
Trusts, and Business Loan Express SBA Loan Trusts has been
deteriorating, as evidenced by rising delinquencies, increased
default frequencies, and longer recovery periods.  The current
economic stresses seem to be having the greatest impact on
delinquency rates, but they are also affecting the timing in which
the transactions recognize recoveries.  The negative CreditWatch
placements reflect S&P's lower-than-expected recovery assumptions
for these transactions.

As part of the analysis, Standard & Poor's ran updated loan tapes
(loan details on the obligor level) through S&P's Small Business
Portfolio Evaluator using updated 2009 Small Business
Administration industry default data.  Since the 2009 data
captures more of the recent stressful environment, the expected
default rates have subsequently increased as well.

Standard & Poor's expects to resolve the CreditWatch placements
within the next three months, after S&P conduct a more detailed
review, and may take further ratings actions as appropriate.

                         Rating Actions

        Business Loan Express Business Loan Trust 2006-A

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        A                        AAA/Watch Neg       AAA
        B                        A/Watch Neg         A
        C                        BBB/Watch Neg       BBB

        Business Loan Express Business Loan Trust 2007-A

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        A                        AAA/Watch Neg       AAA
        B                        AA/Watch Neg        AA
        C                        A/Watch Neg         A
        D                        BBB/Watch Neg       BBB

           Business Loan Express SBA Loan Trust 2005-1

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        A                        AAA/Watch Neg       AAA
        M                        A/Watch Neg         A

           Business Loan Express SBA Loan Trust 2006-1

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        A                        BBB/Watch Neg       BBB

                       LBSBC NIM Co. 2006-1

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        N1                       BBB/Watch Neg       BBB
        N2                       BB/Watch Neg        BB
        N3                       B/Watch Neg         B

                       LBSBC NIM Co. 2006-2

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        N1                       BBB/Watch Neg       BBB
        N2                       BB/Watch Neg        BB
        N3                       B/Watch Neg         B

                       LBSBC NIM Co. 2007-3

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        N1                       BBB/Watch Neg       BBB
        N2                       BB/Watch Neg        BB
        N3                       B/Watch Neg         B

              Lehman Bros. Small Balance Commercial
                             2005-2

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        B                        BBB+/Watch Neg      BBB+
        M2                       A+/Watch Neg        A+
        M3                       A/Watch Neg         A

              Lehman Bros. Small Balance Commercial
                             2006-1

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        B                        BBB+/Watch Neg      BBB+
        M1                       AA/Watch Neg        AA
        M2                       A+/Watch Neg        A+
        M3                       A/Watch Neg         A

    Lehman Bros. Small Balance Commercial Loan Trust 2006-SBA
                            2006-SBA

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        A                        BBB-/Watch Neg      BBB-

   Lehman Bros. Small Balance Commercial Mortgage Trust 2006-2

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        B                        BBB+/Watch Neg      BBB+
        M1                       AA/Watch Neg        AA
        M2                       A+/Watch Neg        A+
        M3                       A/Watch Neg         A

   Lehman Bros. Small Balance Commercial Mortgage Trust 2006-3

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        B                        BBB+/Watch Neg      BBB+
        M1                       AA/Watch Neg        AA
        M2                       A+/Watch Neg        A+
        M3                       A/Watch Neg         A

   Lehman Bros. Small Balance Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-1

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        B                        BBB+/Watch Neg      BBB+
        M1                       AA/Watch Neg        AA
        M2                       A+/Watch Neg        A+
        M3                       A/Watch Neg         A
        M4                       BBB+/Watch Neg      BBB+

   Lehman Bros. Small Balance Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-2

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        B                        BBB/Watch Neg       BBB
        M1                       AA/Watch Neg        AA
        M2                       AA-/Watch Neg       AA-
        M3                       A/Watch Neg         A
        M4                       A-/Watch Neg        A-
        M5                       BBB+/Watch Neg      BBB+

   Lehman Bros. Small Balance Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-3

                                         Rating
                                         ------
        Class                    To                  From
        -----                    --                  ----
        B                        BBB/Watch Neg       BBB
        M1                       AA/Watch Neg        AA
        M2                       AA-/Watch Neg       AA-
        M3                       A/Watch Neg         A
        M4                       A-/Watch Neg        A-
        M5                       BBB+/Watch Neg      BBB+



                           *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers'
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

A list of Meetings, Conferences and Seminars appears in each
Wednesday's edition of the TCR. Submissions about insolvency-
related conferences are encouraged.  Send announcements to
conferences@bankrupt.com/

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

For copies of court documents filed in the District of Delaware,
please contact Vito at Parcels, Inc., at 302-658-9911.  For
bankruptcy documents filed in cases pending outside the District
of Delaware, contact Ken Troubh at Nationwide Research &
Consulting at 207/791-2852.

                           *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Frederick, Maryland,
USA.  Ma. Theresa Amor J. Tan Singco, Ronald C. Sy, Joel Anthony
G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa, Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2009.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $775 for 6 months delivered via e-
mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Christopher
Beard at 240/629-3300.

                  *** End of Transmission ***