T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

            Tuesday, November 20, 2007, Vol. 11, No. 275

                             Headlines



ABCDS 2006-1: Moody's Junks Ratings on $17 Million Notes
ACA ABS: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on $562 Million Notes
ADVANCED MICRO: Secures $622 Mil. Investment from Mubadala Unit
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES: $1.2BB 3M Co Deal Cues S&P's Positive Watch
AFM 805: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES: Board Approves Share-Repurchase Program
AGILENT TECH: Moody's Says Stock Repurchase Won't Affect Ratings
ALLTEL CORP: Tender Offers for Debt Securities Expires
ALLTEL CORP: Completes $27.5 Billion Sale to Atlantis Holdings
AMP'D MOBILE: Wants to Sell Warrant to Buy 375,000 Obopay Shares

ARIZANT INC: S&P Revises Senior Facility Recovery Rating to 3
ARMSTRONG HOLDINGS: Commences Asset Distribution on December 12
ASHTON PLACE: Moody's Holds Rating and Revises Outlook to Neg.
AVET COACH: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
BANC OF AMERICA: S&P Holds Low-B Ratings on Six Cert. Classes

BANC OF AMERICA: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 12 Tranches
BAYOU GROUP: Judge Hardin Approves Klestadt as Special Counsel
BAYOU GROUP: Has Until November 30 To File Chapter 11 Plan
BEAR STEARNS: Foreign Reps. File Opening Appellant Brief
BEAR STEARNS: Massachusetts Files Admin. Complaint Against BSAM

BELL MICRO: Has Until January 31 to Comply with Nasdaq Listing
BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL: Moody's Withdraws Ratings on Term Loans
BORGWARNER CAPITAL: Moody's Reviews Preferred Shelf's  Rating
BOWIE RESOURCES: Sixth Circuit Sheds Light on Sec. 363 Asset Sale
BRODERICK CDO: S&P Puts 'BB+' Rating Under Negative CreditWatch

CARBIZ INC: Commences Sales and Collections Operations in Kentucky
CHRYSLER LLC: Officially Seals New Labor Agreement with UAW
CITIGROUP MORTGAGE: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 16 Tranches
CLEARANT INC: Net Loss Drops to $576,000 in Qtr. ended Sept. 30
COMVERSE TECH: Consolidates Management Structure with Affiliate

CONSECO FINANCE: S&P Assigns Default Rating on Class B-2 Loan
DANA CORP: Gets Court Approval to Settle 7,500 Asbestos Claims
DAVI & VALENTI: Files List of 18 Largest Unsecured Creditors
DEED AND NOTE: Files List of 12 Largest Unsecured Creditors
DELPHI CORP: Reaches Agreement with Investors on Plan Amendments

DEUTSCHE BANK: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 62 Tranches
DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Retains Ratings Under Positive Watch
DUNMORE HOMES: Wants Court Nod to Use Lenders' Cash Collateral
DUNMORE HOMES: Asks Court OK to Obtain $1 Million DIP Financing
DURA AUTOMOTIVE: U.S. Trustee Objects to Chapter 11 Plan

DURA AUTOMOTIVE: Noteholders Support U.S. Trustee's Objections
DURA AUTOMOTIVE: Second Lien Group Objects to Chapter 11 Plan
EAGER BEAVER: Case Summary & 14 Largest Unsecured Creditors
EL PASO: S&P Affirms 'BB' Corporate Credit Ratings
EQUITY ONE: S&P Cuts Rating on Class B Certs. to BB from BBB

FEUERMAN STUDIOS: Case Summary & 18 Largest Unsecured Creditors
FIRST FRANKLIN: Moody's Cuts Ratings on 9 Certificate Classes
GILLESPIE ACQUISITION: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsec. Creditors
GSR TRUST: Poor Collateral Performance Cues S&P to Cut Ratings
GSV INC: Posts $1,716 Net Loss in Third Quarter Ended Sept. 30

HINES HORTICULTURE: Sept. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $1.2 M.
HOLLINGER INC: Sept. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by CDN$133 Mil.
HOUGHTON INT'L: S&P Withdraws Ratings at Company's Request
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL: Moody's Places Ratings Under Review
INDEPENDENCE TAX: Sept. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $6.7 Mil.

INTEGRATED HEALTH: Sept. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $39.5 M.
INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT: Trustee Wants to Sell NJ Property
IXION PLC: Moody's Junks Rating on $50 Million Notes
JOHNSTON BREWING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
KEY ENERGY: Prices $425 Million of 8.375% Sr. Notes Offering

LEAP WIRELESS: Delays 10Q Filing Due to Financial Restatements
LEVITZ FURNITURE: Employs Kurtzman Carson as Notice & Claims Agent
LEVITZ FURNITURE: Hires Rodman & Renshaw as Financial Advisor
LOCHSONG LTD: Moody's Reviews Ratings on Three Note Classes
MAGELLAN HEALTH: S&P Lifts Debt Issue Ratings to BBB- from BB

MARLIN LEMPKE: Case Summary & 10 Largest Unsecured Creditors
MCMORAN EXPLORATION: Completes $300 Mil. Sale of Senior Notes
MIRANT CORP: To Return $4.6 Billion in Excess Cash to Stockholders
MIRANT CORP: Buyback Program Cues S&P to Hold 'B+' Rating
MOBIUS ENTERTAINMENT: Defaults on $12.65 Million State Loan

MONEYGRAM INT'L: Moody's Lowers Issuer Rating to Ba1 from Baa3
MORGAN STANLEY: S&P Affirms 'B-' Rating on $3 Million Notes
MOVIE GALLERY: Won't be Able to File Plan Before November 27
MOVIE GALLERY: Delays Form 10-Q Filing for Qtr. Ended Sept. 30
MOVIE GALLERY: Court Gives Final Okay to $150MM Goldman Sachs Loan

MTI TECHNOLOGY: Gets Final OK to Use DIP Funds and Cash Collateral
NATURADE INC: President and CEO Richard Munro Resigns
NEAH POWER: Completes $500,000 Convertible Debenture Offering
NELLSON NUTRACEUTICAL: Examiner Says Ch. 11 Trustee Not Necessary
NEUMANN HOMES: Section 341(a) Meeting Scheduled for December 20

NEUMANN HOMES: Has Until Dec. 17 to File Schedules & Statements
NEW YORK RACING: Hearing on Exclusivity Periods Moved to Dec. 12
NEW YORK RACING: Plainfield Balks at Exclusive Period Extension
NICHOLS BROTHERS: Files Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Washington
NORTHERN ROCK: Changes Board with 2nd Phase of Strategic Review

NUANCE COMMS: Posts $3.4 Mil. Net Loss in Quarter Ended Sept. 30
PACIFIC LUMBER: Bank of New York Wants Mediation Procedures Set
PACIFIC LUMBER: Scopac Wants Cash Collateral Use Until Feb. 2008
PALM COAST: Case Summary & Three Largest Unsecured Creditors
PARMALAT SPA: Could Get EUR3.1 Billion from Claims Settlement

PARMALAT SPA: Italian Prosecutors Pursue BofA Link Evidence
PAUL DE MARRAIS: Case Summary & Seven Largest Unsecured Creditors
PEOPLOUNGERS INC: Committee Says Asset Sale Has "No Benefit"
PERFORMANCE TRANSPORTATION: Case Summary & 30 Largest Creditors
PETRO ACQUISITION: Receiver Puts Units Under Chapter 11

POPE & TALBOT: Files Ch. 11 Petition under U.S. Bankruptcy Code
POPE & TALBOT: Case Summary & 29 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PRESTON CDO I: Moody's Puts Low-B Ratings on $28 Million Notes
REMY WORLDWIDE: Bankruptcy Court Approves CVC Settlement Agreement
REMY WORLDWIDE: Can Assume Caterpillar Inventory Agreement

RESIDENTIAL ASSET: Moody's Lowers Ratings on 21 Cert. Classes
RG GLOBAL: June 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $8.7 Million
RUTLAND RATED: Moody's Junks Rating on $20 Million Series 40 Notes
RUTLAND RATED: Moody's Junks Rating on $5 Million Series 41 Notes
RUTLAND RATED: Moody's Junks Rating on $12.5 Mil. Series 39 Notes

SCIENTIFIC GAMES: Completes Buy of 50% Stake in Guard Libang
SR TELECOM: Files for Creditor Protection under CCAA
STERLING AUTOMOTIVE: Customer Complaints May Lead to Bankruptcy
STRUCTURED ASSET: S&P Lowers Ratings on 10 Certificate Classes
STRUCTURED ASSET: Moody's Reviews Ratings on Two Cert. Classes

STRUCTURED ASSET: Moody's Cuts Rating on Class II-B-3 Certs. to B1
SUBURBAN PROPANE: Posts $32.1 Mil. Net Loss in Qtr. Ended Sept. 29
SYLVEST FARMS: Court Denies Administrator's Case Conversion Plea
TOWER AUTOMOTIVE: Reaches Settlement Resolving Michigan's Claim
TRIGEM COMPUTER: Representatives File Third Section 1518(1) Report

UNITED RENTALS: Moody's Affirms Ratings and Changes Outlook
US FARMS: Sept. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $104,224
VESTA INSURANCE: Gaines Plan Trustee Wants Nod on Settlement
VESTA INSURANCE: Court Okays Florida Select's Texas SDR Settlement
WACO ACQUISITIONS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

WESTERN SPRINGS: Moody's Lowers Ratings on Seven Note Classes
WESTMORELAND COAL: Receives Non-Compliance Notice from AMEX
WHX CORP: Sept. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $78.5 Million
XEROX CORP: Solid Position Prompts Moody's to Lift Ratings

* Bridge Associates Names John Pidcock as Director

* Moody's Junks Rating on Credit Default Swap Reference CN100985
* Moody's Takes Rating Actions on Various Transactions
* S&P Addresses CreditWatch Placements on $3.3 Bil. Securities
* S&P Puts Ratings on 803 Classes of US RMBS Under Neg. Watch

* Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheets



                             *********

ABCDS 2006-1: Moody's Junks Ratings on $17 Million Notes
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed these notes issued by ABCDS 2006-
1, Ltd. on review for possible downgrade:

Class Description: $200,000,000 Senior Swap Agreement with Royal
                   Bank of Canada, London Branch

Prior Rating: Aaa
Current Rating: Aaa, on review for possible downgrade

In addition Moody's downgraded and left on review for possible
downgrade these notes:

Class Description: $60,000,000 Class A-2 First Priority Senior
                   Secured Floating Rate Notes Due 2050

Prior Rating: Aaa
Current Rating: A2, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $51,600,000 Class A-3 Second Priority
                   Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes Due 2050

Prior Rating: Aaa
Current Rating: A3, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $48,600,000 Class B Third Priority Senior
                   Secured Floating Rate Notes Due 2050

Prior Rating: Aa2
Current Rating: Baa3, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $8,400,000 Class C Fourth Priority Mezzanine
                   Secured Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Notes
                   Due 2050

Prior Rating: A2
Current Rating: Ba3, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $12,000,000 Class D Fifth Priority Mezzanine
                   Secured Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Notes
                   Due 2050

Prior Rating: Baa2
Current Rating: Caa3, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $5,000,000 Class E Sixth Priority Mezzanine
                   Secured Floating Rate Deferrable Interest Notes
                   Due 2050

Prior Rating: Baa3
Current Rating: Caa3, on review for possible downgrade

According to Moody's, the rating actions are the result of
deterioration in the credit quality of the transaction's
underlying collateral pool, which consists primarily of structured
finance securities.


ACA ABS: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on $562 Million Notes
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded and left on review for
possible further downgrade two classes of notes issued by ACA ABS
CDO 2006-2, Limited. T he notes affected by today's rating action
are as follows:

Class Description: $460,000,000 Class A-1LA Floating Rate Notes
                   Due January 2047

Prior Rating: Baa3, on review for possible downgrade
Current Rating: B3, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $102,000,000 Class A-1LB Floating Rate Notes
                   Due January 2047

Prior Rating: B3, on review for possible downgrade
Current Rating: Caa2, on review for possible downgrade

The rating actions reflect severe deterioration in the credit
quality of the underlying portfolio, as well as the occurrence on
November 1, 2007 of an event of default caused by a failure of the
Senior Class A Overcollateralization Ratio to equal or exceed
100%, as required under Section 5.1(h) of the Indenture dated
November 29, 2006.

ACA ABS CDO 2006-2, Limited is a collateralized debt obligation
backed primarily by a portfolio of RMBS and CDO securities.

Recent ratings downgrades on the underlying portfolio caused
ratings-based haircuts to effect the calculation of
overcollateralization.  Thus, the Senior Class A
Overcollateralization Ratio failed to meet the required level.

Upon an event of default in this transaction, a majority of the
controlling class is entitled to exercise certain remedies under
the indenture.  Liquidation of the underlying portfolio is one
possible remedy; however, it is not clear at this time whether the
controlling class will choose to exercise this option.

The rating downgrades taken today reflect the increased expected
loss associated with each tranche.  Losses are attributed to
diminished credit quality on the underlying portfolio.  The
expected losses of certain tranches may be different, however,
depending on the timing and choice of remedy to be pursued by the
controlling class.  Because of this uncertainty, the Class A-1LA
and the Class A-1LB Notes remain on review for possible downgrade
pending the receipt of definitive information.


ADVANCED MICRO: Secures $622 Mil. Investment from Mubadala Unit
---------------------------------------------------------------
AMD has received an investment from a subsidiary of Mubadala
Development Company.  Mubadala invested approximately
$622 million, receiving 49 million newly-issued shares at a price
per share of $12.70, the closing price of AMD common stock on Nov.
15, 2007.

AMD received approximately $608 million, after reimbursing
Mubadala for approximately $14.6 million in expenses.  AMD will
use the net proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock
for general corporate purposes including accelerating its long-
term, customer-focused growth strategy by investing in R&D,
product innovations and manufacturing excellence.

"We proudly welcome Mubadala, a world-class investor, to the AMD
shareholder family.  This investment strengthens AMD's ability to
deliver customer-centric innovation and choice to the marketplace,
creating greater value for all of our shareholders," said AMD
chairman and CEO Hector Ruiz.

"AMD is a great fit for Mubadala's investment approach - a
spirited competitor and innovator led by a strong and visionary
management team," Khaldoon Khalifa Al Mubarak Mubadala CEO and
managing director said.  "We see significant opportunities for
long-term growth and value creation."

This is a non-controlling, minority investment.  Mubadala will not
receive any board representation as part of the deal.  This
transaction does not present a controlling investment or
acquisition subject to review by the Committee on Foreign
Investment in the U.S.

Merrill Lynch acted as financial advisor to AMD.  Lehman Brothers
acted as lead financial advisor to Mubadala; Morgan Stanley acted
as co-financial advisor.

               About Mubadala Development Company

Headquartered in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Mubadala
Development Company -- http://www.mubadala.ae/-- is a strategic  
investment and development company that is wholly-owned by the Abu
Dhabi Government.  The company has an international portfolio,
with interests in sectors such as energy, heavy industry,
telecommunications, infrastructure, and aerospace.

               About Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

Headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, Advanced Micro Devices
Inc. -- http://www.amd.com/-- (NYSE: AMD) designs and   
manufactures microprocessors and other semiconductor products.

                        *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 14, 2007,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its B/Negative/--
corporate credit rating on Sunnyvale, California-based Advanced
Micro Devices Inc.  At the same time, S&P assigned its 'B' rating
to the company's $1.5 billion 5.75% senior convertible notes due
2012, and raised the rating on the company's existing senior
unsecured debt to 'B' from 'B-', because the company no longer has
secured debt in its capital structure.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 13, 2007,
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'CCC+/RR6' rating to Advanced Micro
Devices Inc.'s private placement of $1.5 billion 5.75% convertible
senior notes due 2012.  

Fitch also affirmed the company's Issuer Default Rating at 'B';
and Senior unsecured debt at 'CCC+/RR6'.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on July 26, 2007,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'B/Negative/--'
corporate credit rating on Sunnyvale, California-based Advanced
Micro Devices Inc.  At the same time, Standard & Poor's lowered
the rating on the company's 7.75% senior notes due 2012 to 'B-'
from 'BB-', which is now rated the same as the company's other
senior unsecured notes, reflecting release of the collateral
securing the issue.


AEARO TECHNOLOGIES: $1.2BB 3M Co Deal Cues S&P's Positive Watch
---------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services placed its 'B' corporate credit
rating on Aearo Technologies Inc. on CreditWatch with positive
implications, following the announcement that 3M Co. (AA/Stable/A-
1+) will acquire the company for $1.2 billion. S&P did not place
the ratings on Aearo's total debt of $675 million on CreditWatch,
because S&P expect the debt to be refinanced as part of the
acquisition (as per covenants in the credit agreement).

Furthermore, S&P expect to withdraw the corporate credit rating
shortly after the close of the acquisition, expected in the first
quarter of 2008.


AFM 805: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: A.F.M. 805, Inc.
             dba Ameristop Express 805
             985 Burlington Park
             Burlington, KY 41005

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-15511

Debtor-affiliates filing separate Chapter 11 petitions:

        Entity                                     Case No.
        ------                                     --------
        A.F.M. 806, Inc.                           07-15512
        A.F.M. 807, Inc.                           07-15513
        A.F.M. 810, Inc.                           07-15514
        A.F.M. 812, Inc.                           07-15515
        A.F.M. 814, Inc.                           07-15516
        A.F.M. 815, Inc.                           07-15517
        A.F.M. 816, Inc.                           07-15518
        Ohio Valley A.F.M., Inc.                   07-15506

Type of Business: The "A.F.M." Debtors are subsidiaries of Waco
                  Acquisitions, Inc.  Ohio Valley A.F.M., Inc., is
                  a subsidiary of OV Acquisition, Inc.  Waco
                  Acquisition and OV Acquisition are subsidiaries
                  of Petro Acquisitions, Inc.

                  The "A.F.M" Debtors' principal business is the
                  operation of convenience stores in Kentucky.
                  Ohio Valley on the other hand is the national
                  franchiser of AmeriStop Food Mart convenience
                  stores and operates company-owned stores as
                  subsidiaries as well as franchise stores within
                  Ohio and Kentucky with a limited number of
                  stores in Indiana and Virginia.

                  Additional detail of the Debtors' bankruptcy
                  filing can be found under the Petro Acquisition
                  story published in today's Troubled Company
                  Reporter.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 12, 2007

Court: Southern District of Ohio (Cincinnati)

Judge: Burton Perlman

Debtors' Counsel: Ronald E. Gold, Esq.
                  Frost Brown Todd, L.L.C.
                  2200 P.N.C. Center
                  201 East Fifth Street
                  Cincinnati, OH 45202
                  Tel: (513) 651-6800
                  Fax: (513) 651-6981

Consolidated financial condition of the "A.F.M." Debtors as of
July 15, 2007:

    Total Assets: $13,813,422

    Total Debts:  $658,578

Consolidated financial condition of Ohio Valley, which includes
the AmeriStop Food Mart company owned stores, as of Aug. 12, 2007:

    Total Assets: $6,383,243

    Total Debts:  $3,331,415

Consolidated List of the Debt30 Largest Unsecured Creditors of
Debtors:

   Entity                                           Claim Amount
   ------                                           ------------
   Dayton Oil Co.                                       $970,647
   Contact: President or Chief Executive Officer
   4232 Colonel Glenn Highway
   Beavercreek, OH 45431

   Core-Mark International                              $865,190
   Attention: Bankruptcy
   1055 Salt River Road
   Leitchfield, KY 42754

   Kentucky Lottery Corp.                               $159,619
   Attention: Bankruptcy
   Contact: President
   6040 Dutchman's Lane
   Louisville, KY 40205-3271

   Dinsmore & Shol                                      $137,961

   Joseph Decosimo & Co.                                $153,027

   Pepsi-Cola Bottling-Cincinnati                        $79,586

   Coca Cola Bottling Co.                                $46,008

   C.N.A. Insurance                                      $35,542

   Trauth Dairy                                          $27,532

   R.G.I.S.                                              $24,771

   Radio Station 94.9                                    $19,363

   Home City Ice Co.                                     $17,900

   I.C.E.E.-U.S.A. Corp.                                 $15,842

   Flanagan, Lieberman, Hoffman & Swaine                 $10,304

   The Merten Group                                      $12,240

   W.U.B.E.-F.M.                                         $10,166

   Charles Deglow                                         $9,619

   Tri-State Juice                                        $9,349

   Narendra Patel                                         $7,524

   RJM Management                                         $7,429

   Cox Auto Trader                                        $7,240

   ZEP Manufacturing Co.                                  $7,217

   Duke Energy                                            $7,085

   Tri-State Service Station                              $7,024

   Movie Gallery U.S. Inc.                                $6,838

   M.W. Davis                                             $6,382

   Frito-Lay, Inc.                                        $6,168

   Staples                                                $6,087

   Movies U Buy/S.Q.S.                                     $6,144

   Marge Schott                                           $5,881


AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES: Board Approves Share-Repurchase Program
-------------------------------------------------------------
Agilent Technologies Inc. said that its Board of Directors has
approved a share-repurchase program of up to $2 billion of its
common stock over the next two years.  Agilent completed its
previous $2 billion share buyback in October, bringing its
cumulative repurchases to $6.466 billion since the program's
inception in 2005.

""The Board's decision reflects our confidence in Agilent's
operating model and strong cash flow," said Bill Sullivan, Agilent
president and chief executive officer.  "It also demonstrates our
continuing commitment to return excess cash to the owners."

Agilent anticipates the share-repurchase program will be
implemented using a variety of methods, which may include open-
market purchases, block trades, accelerated share-repurchase
transactions or otherwise, or by any combination of such methods.  
The number of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any
repurchases will depend on factors such as the stock price,
economic and market conditions, and corporate and regulatory
requirements.  The stock-repurchase program may be suspended or
discontinued at any time.

Agilent Technologies Inc. (NYSE: A) -- http://www.agilent.com/--  
is a measurement company and a technology leader in
communications, electronics, life sciences and chemical analysis.  
The company's 19,000 employees serve customers in more than 110
countries.  The company has operations in India, Argentina, Puerto
Rico, Bolivia, Paraguay, Venezuela, and Luxembourg, among others.


AGILENT TECH: Moody's Says Stock Repurchase Won't Affect Ratings
----------------------------------------------------------------
Agilent Technologies, Inc. announcement that its board has
authorized a new $2 billion common stock repurchase program to be
implemented over the next two years will not impact Agilent's
credit rating, according to Moody's Investors Service.  The share
repurchase is expected to be funded with proceeds from free cash
flow, cash and option exercises.

Moody's believes the announcement will not impact Agilent's
ratings given the company's strong liquidity even after
considering the planned share repurchase program.  Nonetheless,
the announcement continues to indicate an aggressive use of
Agilent's significant balance sheet liquidity ($1.8 billion of
unrestricted cash as of October 2007) since we expect free cash
flow after acquisitions for fiscal 2008 to be less than the $1
billion of annual share repurchases planned.  As such, the
company's continued use of free cash flow for non-productive
purposes reduces financial flexibility and could constrain the
rating at the current rating level.  In October 2007, the company
completed a $600 million debt offering to replenish cash balances
that were used to fund the remaining purchases under its fiscal
2007 $2 billion accelerated stock buyback program.  Moody's noted
that at the current rating category, Agilent had capacity to incur
the additional debt supported by higher EBITDA levels.

The Ba1 rating currently incorporates financial policies that are
not fully aligned with creditor interests as well as the potential
for leveraging event risk.  The rating also captures the
expectation that healthy liquidity and low balance sheet leverage
will be maintained.  Moody's notes the maintenance of strong
liquidity is critical in order to ensure the ability to continue
investing in new product development during the inevitable
industry down cycles and also to maintain flexibility for
opportunistic acquisitions that fill in technology gaps or round
out service capabilities.

Following the execution of the share repurchase program, Moody's
expects that Agilent will maintain cash balances of around $1
billion or more in addition to having access to a $300 million
multiyear committed unsecured credit facility.  Additional
liquidity support is derived from our expectation that free cash
flow generation will remain robust through cycles given that
operating performance continues to be solid.  Moody's expects that
the bulk of free cash flow is likely to be used for strategic
acquisitions and share repurchases under the new $2 billion share
repurchase program, thereby limiting further cash buildup.  To the
extent that acquisitions plus share repurchases were to
significantly exceed amounts provided by the company's free cash
flow for a sustained period, the rating or outlook would not
likely experience upward pressure.

Headquartered in Santa Clara, California, Agilent Technologies,
Inc. is a leading measurement technology company serving the
communications, electronics, life sciences and chemical analysis
industries.  Net revenues for the twelve months ended October 31,
2007 were $5.4 billion.


ALLTEL CORP: Tender Offers for Debt Securities Expires
------------------------------------------------------
Alltel Corporation disclosed the expiration, as of 8:00 a.m., New
York City time, on Nov. 16, 2007, of the cash tender offers and
consent solicitations by its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Alltel
Communications, Inc. and Alltel Ohio Limited Partnership, for
their outstanding debt securities.

The final results of the tender offers and consent solicitations
for the Securities are:

1) Issuer: ACI
   Title of Security & CUSIP No.: 6.65% Senior Notes due 2008
   (CUSIP No. 885571AE9)
   Principal Amount Outstanding: $38,981,000
   Amount of Securities Tendered: $26,189,000
   Approximate Percentage Tendered: 67.18%

2) Issuer: ACI
   Title of Security & CUSIP No.: 7.60% Senior Notes due 2009
   (CUSIP No. 885571AD1)
   Principal Amount Outstanding: $52,974,000
   Amount of Securities Tendered: $49,272,000
   Approximate Percentage Tendered: 93.01%

3) Issuer: Alltel Ohio
   Title of Security & CUSIP No.: 8.00% Notes due 2010
   (CUSIP No. 02003XAA8)
   Principal Amount Outstanding: $297,338,000
   Amount of Securities Tendered: $280,038,000
   Approximate Percentage Tendered: 94.18%

As a result of receiving consents from holders of more than a
majority in aggregate principal amount of each series of
Securities, each Issuer has entered into a supplemental indenture
implementing the proposed amendments to the relevant indentures
governing the Securities, which eliminate or make less restrictive
certain restrictive covenants and conditions to defeasance, as
well as certain events of default with respect to certain series
of Securities, and related provisions in the indentures.

Citi and Goldman, Sachs & Co. acted as dealer managers for the
tender offers and as solicitation agents for the consent
solicitations.  For additional information regarding the terms of
the tender offers and consent solicitations, please contact: Citi
at (800) 558-3745 (toll-free) or Goldman, Sachs & Co at (877) 686-
5059 (toll free).  Requests for documents may be directed to
Global Bondholder Services, which acted as the depositary and
information agent for the tender offers and consent solicitations,
at (866) 540-1500 (toll-free).

Headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, ALLTEL Corporation
(NYSE:AT) -- http://www.alltel.com/-- operates America's largest   
wireless network, which delivers voice and advanced data services
nationwide to 12 million customers.  Alltel is a Forbes 500
company with annual revenues of nearly $8 billion.

                      *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Nov. 12, 2007,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on ALLTEL
Corp., including its corporate credit rating, which was lowered to
'B+' from 'BB'.  The outlook is
negative.

As reported in the TCR on Nov. 9, 2007, Fitch Ratings downgraded
the ratings of Alltel Corporation and its subsidiaries, Alltel
Communications Inc. and Alltel Ohio Limited Partnership including
Alltel Corp.'s Issuer Default Rating to 'B' from 'BB-'; $1.5
billion credit facility to 'CCC+/RR6' from 'BB-'; Senior unsecured
debt to 'CCC+/RR6' from 'BB-'; and ACI's IDR to 'B' from 'BB-';
$39 million senior unsecured notes due 2008 to 'B/RR4' from 'BB-';
$53 million senior unsecured notes due 2009 to 'B/RR4' from 'BB-'.  
Fitch also lowered Alltel Ohio's IDR to 'B' from BB-' and $297
million senior unsecured notes due 2010 'B/RR4' from 'BB-'.

As reported in the TCR on Nov. 6, 2007, Moody's Investors Service
assigned a B2 Corporate Family Rating and a SGL-2 Speculative
Grade Liquidity Rating to Alltel Corporation.  In addition,
Moody's assigned a Ba3 rating to the senior secured facilities and
a Caa1 rating to the senior unsecured facilities related to the
acquisition of Alltel Communications Inc.


ALLTEL CORP: Completes $27.5 Billion Sale to Atlantis Holdings
--------------------------------------------------------------
Alltel Corp. has completed the closing of its merger with Atlantis
Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of TPG Capital and GS Capital
Partners, in a transaction valued at $27.5 billion.  Holders of
Alltel common stock will receive $71.50 per share in cash under
the terms of the merger agreement, which was adopted by Alltel
shareholders at a special meeting on Aug. 29, 2007.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Oct. 31, 2007,
Alltel Corp. disclosed that the Federal Communications Commission
has approved the proposed acquisition of Alltel by Atlantis.

As a result of the transaction, Alltel's stock will cease trading
on the New York Stock Exchange at close of market on
Nov. 16, 2007.

"This transaction delivers substantial value to our shareholders,
and we want to thank them again for their support through the
years," Scott Ford, Alltel's president and chief executive
officer, said.

Headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, ALLTEL Corporation
(NYSE:AT) -- http://www.alltel.com/-- operates America's largest   
wireless network, which delivers voice and advanced data services
nationwide to 12 million customers.  Alltel is a Forbes 500
company with annual revenues of nearly $8 billion.

                         *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Nov. 12, 2007,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its ratings on ALLTEL
Corp., including its corporate credit rating, which was lowered to
'B+' from 'BB'.  The outlook is
negative.

As reported in the TCR on Nov. 9, 2007, Fitch Ratings downgraded
the ratings of Alltel Corporation and
its subsidiaries, Alltel Communications Inc. and Alltel Ohio
Limited Partnership including Alltel Corp.'s Issuer Default Rating
to 'B' from 'BB-'; $1.5 billion credit facility to 'CCC+/RR6' from
'BB-'; Senior unsecured debt to 'CCC+/RR6' from 'BB-'; and ACI's
IDR to 'B' from 'BB-'; $39 million senior unsecured notes due 2008
to 'B/RR4' from 'BB-'; $53 million senior unsecured notes due 2009
to 'B/RR4' from 'BB-'.  Fitch also lowered Alltel Ohio's IDR to
'B' from BB-' and $297 million senior unsecured notes due 2010
'B/RR4' from 'BB-'.

As reported in the TCR on Nov. 6, 2007, Moody's Investors Service
assigned a B2 Corporate Family Rating and a SGL-2 Speculative
Grade Liquidity Rating to Alltel Corporation.  In addition,
Moody's assigned a Ba3 rating to the senior secured facilities and
a Caa1 rating to the senior unsecured facilities related to the
acquisition of Alltel Communications Inc.


AMP'D MOBILE: Wants to Sell Warrant to Buy 375,000 Obopay Shares
----------------------------------------------------------------
Amp'd Mobile Inc. seeks permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware to sell certain warrant to purchase
375,000 shares of the common stock of Obopay Inc.

On July 12, 2006, Obopay has entered into a partnership with Amp'd
Mobile.  Under the terms of the agreement, the two companies,
offered a mobile payment service, Obopay-Amp'd to Amp'd Mobile
subscribers, and Amp'd Mobile agreed to promote the service to all
Amp'd subscribers.  

Kathryn D. Sallie, Esq., at The Bayard Firm, stated that the
Debtor will complete the intended sale without further notice,
hearing or court order pursuant to Court-approved de minimis asset
sale procedures, if no objection is filed against the sale notice.

Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, Amp'd Mobile Inc. aka
Amp'D Mobile LLC -- http://www.ampd.com/-- is a mobile virtual
network operator that provides voice, text and entertainment
content to subscribers who contract for cellular telephone
service. The company filed for chapter 11 protection on June 1,
2007 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 07-10739). Steven M. Yoder, Esq.,
Eric M. Sutty, Esq. and Mary E. Augustine, Esq. at The Bayard
Firm represent the Debtor in its restructuring efforts.  Attorneys
at Otterbourg, Steindler, Houston & Rosen, P.C. and Klehr,
Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg & Ellers, LLP, represent the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  In its schedules filed with the
Court, the Debtor listed total assets of $47,603,629 and total
debts of $164, 569,842. The Debtor's exclusive period to file a
plan expired on Sept. 29, 2007. (Amp'd Mobile Bankruptcy News,
Issue No. 20; Bankruptcy Creditors' Services Inc.
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


ARIZANT INC: S&P Revises Senior Facility Recovery Rating to 3
-------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said that it has revised its
recovery rating on Minneapolis, Minnesota-based Arizant Inc.'s
senior secured revolving credit facility and term loan to '3'
from '4'.
      
"This revision predominantly reflects the company's debt
reduction, and changes to our assumptions around U.S. versus
foreign EBITDA," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Jesse
Juliano.
     
The '3' recovery rating indicates S&P's expectations for
meaningful recovery (50%-70%) in the event of a payment default.  
The senior secured rating on the revolver and term loan remains
'B+'.  The corporate credit rating is affirmed at 'B+'; the
outlook is stable.
           
The speculative-grade ratings on Arizant reflect its limited size
and resources, its operation within a niche market, and the
potential for debt-financed acquisitions or dividends.  These
factors overshadow the company's leading position in the
temperature management market, its consistent growth, and its very
conservative capital structure for the current rating.
     
Arizant is the leading manufacturer of perioperative temperature
management products.  Its three product lines are disposable
warming blankets used during surgery, fluid warming devices, and
disposable hospital warming gowns.  The company generates largely
recurring revenue because disposable products are used with its
growing installed base of fixed warming units.


ARMSTRONG HOLDINGS: Commences Asset Distribution on December 12
---------------------------------------------------------------
Armstrong Holdings Inc. disclosed its timetable for dissolution
including distribution of net assets to shareholders.
    
Dec. 5, 2007, will be the last day of trading in ACKH common
stock, and will be the record date for shareholders entitled to
receive a final distribution of the company's net assets.  The
company's stock transfer books will close and no further trading
or transfers will be recognized after settlement of trades made
through that date.
    
On Dec. 12, 2007, the distribution agent, American Stock Transfer
& Trust Company, will begin the distribution of assets to
shareholders.

After this distribution, Armstrong Holdings Inc. will file
Articles of Dissolution with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and
will cease to exist.
    
The company's net assets for distribution total approximately $28
million, which will be divided pro-rata per share among the
holders of the 40,551,975 outstanding shares of ACKH common stock.  
This amounts to a distribution of approximately $0.69 per share.  

Shareholders should consult their tax advisor on the tax
implications of this distribution.  Shareholders who hold ACKH
stock in brokerage accounts will receive the distribution in their
accounts and their ACKH holdings will be cancelled
after the distribution.
    
Direct shareholders do not need to return their stock certificates
to receive a distribution.  Those certificates will become void
and have no value.  When they receive their distribution checks,
direct shareholders should cancel or destroy those Armstrong
Holdings stock certificates.
    
Direct shareholders with questions concerning their accounts
should contact American Stock Transfer & Trust Company at (800)
937-5449.

                 About Armstrong Holdings Inc.
    
Based in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Armstrong Holdings Inc. (OTC
Bulletin Board: ACKH) -- http://www.armstrong.com/-- was the  
parent holding company of Armstrong World Industries Inc.  On Oct.
2, 2006, Armstrong World Industries Inc. emerged from Chapter 11
reorganization under its Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization,
which provided for the cancellation of the AWI stock owned by the
company.   The company has conducted no business and had no
operations since Oct. 2, 2006.


ASHTON PLACE: Moody's Holds Rating and Revises Outlook to Neg.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Services has affirmed the Caa3 rating on Texas
State Affordable Housing Corporation, Multifamily Housing Revenue
Bonds (Ashton Place and Woodstock Apartments Project) Senior
Series 2001A and C rating on outstanding Series 2001C and Series
2001D bonds.  The ratings affirmation affects $8,665,000
outstanding Series 2001A bonds, $1,025,000 outstanding Series
2001C bonds and $1,025,000 outstanding Series 2001D bonds.  The
outlook has been revised to negative and reflects numerous Events
of Default as outlined in the Trust Indenture, including, further
tapping the Senior Series 2001A Debt Service Reserve Fund, and
insufficient funds in the Series 2001C and Series 2001D Debt
Service Reserve Funds, to make debt service payments.

Occupancy has continued to trend upward at Woodstock Apartments,
currently at 80%, compared to 73% as of May, 2007.  Ashton Place
continues to report occupancy rate of approximately 90%.  NOI and
debt service coverage show slight improvement.  Based on FY 2006
audited financials, debt service coverage on the senior bonds was
0.73 times (excluding the reserve for repair and replacement)
compared to 0.62 a year earlier. Debt service coverage on the
Series C bonds, net of senior debt service, was -2.08 times
(excluding the reserve for repair and replacement); debt service
coverage on the Series D bonds, net of senior and sub debt
service, was -2.70 times (excluding the reserve for repair and
replacement).

The outlook for the bonds has been revised to negative.  The
revised outlook reflects continuing Events of Default and the
properties' poor financial condition.  Due to the management's
failure to submit sufficient funds, the Trustee tapped reserve
funds in the amount of $192,857.87 from the Series 2001A Debt
Service Reserve Fund to make the August 1, 2007 principal and
interest payment on the Series 2001A bonds.  Furthermore, both
properties are in need of various interior and exterior repairs,
which could cause an additional strain on the projects' financial
resources.


AVET COACH: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Avet Coach Corporation
        1369 Blondell Avenue
        Bronx, NY 10461

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-13641

Type of Business: The Debtor offers ambulette transportation
                  services in the metropolitan area.
                  See http://www.avet.com/

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 16, 2007

Court: Southern District of New York (Manhattan)

Debtor's Counsel: Wendy B. Green, Esq.
                  Forman Holt & Eliades LLC
                  218 Route 17 North
                  Rochelle Park, NJ 07662
                  Tel: (201) 845-1000
                  Fax: (201) 845-9112

Estimated Assets: $1 Million to $100 Million

Estimated Debts:  $1 Million to $100 Million

Debtor's list of its 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                        Nature of Claim     Claim Amount
   ------                        ---------------     ------------
Christine Hernandez                                      $435,000
c/o  The Goodarb Law Firm
99 Wall Street, 19th Floor
New York, NY 10005

American Express                                         $225,000
P.O. Box 2855
New York, NY 10116-2855

New York Department                                      $147,000
Taxation & Finance
TSRD Prompt Tax WA Harriman
State Complex
Albany, NY 12227

Cananwill, Inc.                  Auto Liability          $130,000
                                 Insurance Finance

Syvio Abreu                                              $120,000

Wells Fargo                                              $100,000

National Continental Insurance                            $87,000

Local 531 IBT Health & Welfare                            $70,000

Babbekov                                                  $50,000

Miguel Cabrera                                            $50,000

Canon                            Copier Lease             $47,000

Digitech Computers, Inc.                                  $45,000

Sayegh Auto                                               $40,000

Sarad Marketing, Inc.                                     $30,000

Local 707 Health & Welfare Fun                            $22,000

T and S Gas Center                                        $20,000

Ben's Auto Parts                                          $14,000

Parkmatic                                                 $13,000

C.J. Fleet                                                $12,000

Excel Distributors                                         $6,000


BANC OF AMERICA: S&P Holds Low-B Ratings on Six Cert. Classes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services raised its ratings on 11
classes of commercial mortgage pass-through certificates from Banc
of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.' s series 2004-3.  
Concurrently, S&P affirmed its ratings on all remaining classes
from the same series.
     
The raised and affirmed ratings reflect credit enhancement levels
that provide adequate support through various stress scenarios.  
The upgrades of several pooled certificates reflect the defeasance
of $78 million (7%) of the pool's collateral since issuance.
     
The upgrades of the nonpooled UH classes follow our analysis of
the U-Haul portfolio loan and are primarily due to the
deleveraging of the loan since issuance.  All of the cash flows on
the UH classes are derived from the U-Haul Portfolio loan.  The
upgrades of the nonpooled SS classes follow S&P's analysis of the
17 State Street loan and are primarily due to the improved
operating performance of the collateral securing the loan since
issuance.  All of the cash flows on the SS classes are derived
from the 17 State Street loan.

As of the July 10, 2007, remittance report, the collateral pool
consisted of 91 loans with an aggregate trust balance of
$1.11 billion, compared with 94 loans with a $1.27 billion balance
at issuance.  The master servicer, Bank of America, reported
financial information for 96% of the pool, excluding
the defeased loans.  Ninety-five percent of the servicer-reported
information was full-year 2006 data.  Based on this information,
Standard & Poor's calculated a weighted average debt service
coverage of 1.69x, up slightly from 1.61x at issuance.  All of the
loans in the pool are current, and there are no loans with the
special servicer.  To date, the trust has not experienced any
losses.
     
The top 10 loans secured by real estate have an aggregate
outstanding balance of $416.2 million (45%) and a weighted average
DSC of 1.88x, compared with 1.84x at issuance.  Standard & Poor's
reviewed property inspections provided by the master servicer for
all of the assets underlying the top 10 loans, and all of the
collateral was characterized as "good."
     
Credit characteristics for two of the top 10 loans, the U-Haul
Portfolio and 17 State Street loans, remain consistent with those
of investment-grade obligations.  Details are:

     -- The U-Haul Portfolio loan is the largest loan in the
        pool, with a trust balance of $103.4 million and a
        whole-loan balance of $172.4 million.  The whole-loan
        balance consists of the $103.4 million senior interest,
        which is included in the trust, and a $68.9 million
        subordinated interest that is held in a separate REMIC
        in the trust.  The loan is secured by a first mortgage
        encumbering the fee interest in 77 U-Haul self-storage
        properties and one U-Haul truck rental facility
        encompassing 44,931 units.  The properties, which are
        located in 24 states, were built between 1920 and 2003
        and renovated between 1994 and 2001. W.P Carey & Co.
        purchased the properties in conjunction with a 20-year
        sale/leaseback transaction. Under the master lease, the
        current economic occupancy is 100%.  Standard & Poor's
        adjusted net cash flow is similar to its level at
        issuance.

     -- 17 State Street, the second-largest loan in the pool,
        has a trust balance of $74.2 million and a whole-loan
        balance of $109.7 million.  The whole-loan balance
        consists of the $74.2 million senior interest, which is
        included in this transaction, a $13.4 million
        subordinated interest that is held in a separate REMIC
        in the trust, and a $22 million B note that is held
        outside of the trust.  The loan is secured by the fee
        interests of a 49-story class A office building in New
        York, New York.  The property was built in 1988 and
        consists of 531,526 net rentable sq. ft.  Occupancy as
        of June 30, 2007, was 100%, and the year-end 2006 DSC
        was 1.59x.  Standard & Poor's adjusted NCF has
        increased 16% from its level at issuance.

BofA reported a watchlist of 16 loans with an aggregate
outstanding balance of $110.1 million (10%).  The largest loan on
the watchlist, Woodland Park Plaza Office Building ($16.1 million,
1%), is secured by a 225,727-sq.-ft. office property in Houston,
Texas.  The loan is on the watchlist because of a low DSC (0.19x)
as of March 31, 2007.  Occupancy fell to 61% after two major
tenants vacated when their leases expired at the end of 2006.  
However, several new leases were executed in the first half of
2007, and occupancy is expected to increase to 95%.
     
Standard & Poor's stressed the loans on the watchlist and other
loans with credit issues as part of its analysis.  The resultant
credit enhancement levels support the raised and affirmed ratings.
    

                         Ratings Raised
     
            Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.
      Pooled commercial mortgage pass-through certificates
                          series 2004-3

                       Rating
                       ------
           Class     To      From   Credit enhancement
           -----     --      ----   ------------------
           B         AA+     AA           13.17%
           C         AA      AA-          12.05%

            Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.
    Nonpooled commercial mortgage pass-through certificates
                          series 2004-3

                                 Rating
                                 ------
                     Class     To      From
                     -----     --      ----
                     UH-D      AA+     AA                
                     UH-E      AA      AA-               
                     UH-F      AA-     A+                
                     UH-G      A       A-               
                     UH-H      A-      BBB+                
                     UH-J      BBB     BBB-                
                     SS-B      BBB+    BB+               
                     SS-C      BBB     BB                
                     SS-D      BBB-    BB-                

                       Ratings Affirmed
     
            Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.
      Pooled commercial mortgage pass-through certificates
                        series 2004-3

           Class    Rating         Credit enhancement
           -----    ------          ----------------
           A-3      AAA                  15.98%
           A-4      AAA                  15.98%
           A-5      AAA                  15.98%
           A-1A     AAA                  15.98%
           D        A                     9.67%
           E        A-                    8.55%
           F        BBB+                  7.01%
           G        BBB                   5.89%
           H        BBB-                  4.34%
           J        BB+                   3.92%
           K        BB                    3.36%
           L        BB-                   2.80%
           M        B+                    2.38%
           N        B                     2.10%
           O        B-                    1.82%
           X        AAA                    N/A

            Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.
           Nonpooled commercial mortgage pass-through
                   certificates series 2004-3

                         Class    Rating
                         -----    ------
                         UH-A     AAA                   
                         UH-B     AAA                
                         UH-C     AAA                     


                      N/A - Not applicable.


BANC OF AMERICA: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 12 Tranches
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the ratings of 12
tranches and has placed under review for possible downgrade the
ratings of 6 tranches from 3 separate trusts established by Banc
of America Funding Corporation in 2006.  The collateral backing
these classes consists of primarily first lien, fixed and
adjustable-rate, Alt-A mortgage loans.

The ratings were downgraded and placed under review for downgrade
based on higher than anticipated rates of delinquency,
foreclosure, and REO in the underlying collateral relative to
credit enhancement levels.  In its analysis Moody's has also
applied its published methodology updates to the non delinquent
portion of the transactions.

Issuer: Banc of America Funding 2006-7 Trust

  * Cl. T2-M-1 Currently Aa1 on review for possible downgrade,
  * Cl. T2-M-2 Currently Aa2 on review for possible downgrade,
  * Cl. T2-M-3 Currently Aa3 on review for possible downgrade,
  * Cl. T2-M-4, Downgraded to A2, previously A1,
  * Cl. T2-M-5, Downgraded to Baa1, previously A2,
  * Cl. T2-M-6, Downgraded to Baa2, previously A3,
  * Cl. T2-M-7, Downgraded to Ba1, previously Baa2,
  * Cl. T2-M-8, Downgraded to Ba3, previously Baa3,
  * Cl. T2-B-1, Downgraded to B2, previously Ba2.

Issuer: Banc of America Funding 2006-G Trust

  * Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Baa3, previously Baa2,
  * Cl. M-7, Downgraded to B3, previously Ba2.

Issuer: Banc of America Funding 2006-H Trust

  * Cl. M-1 Currently Aa1 on review for possible downgrade,
  * Cl. M-2 Currently Aa2 on review for possible downgrade,
  * Cl. M-3 Currently Aa3 on review for possible downgrade,
  * Cl. M-4, Downgraded to A3, previously A1,
  * Cl. M-5, Downgraded to Baa3, previously A3,
  * Cl. M-6, Downgraded to Ba3, previously Baa1,
  * Cl. M-7, Downgraded to Caa1, previously Baa3.


BAYOU GROUP: Judge Hardin Approves Klestadt as Special Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Adlai S. Hardin, Jr., of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York gave Bayou Group LLC
and its debtor-affiliates authority to employ Klestadt & Winters
LLP as its special counsel.

As the Debtor's special counsel, Klestadt & Winters is expected to
investigate the remaining adversary proceedings before the Court
for which the firm serves as counsel to various plaintiffs.

Tracy L. Klestadt, Esq., a partner of the firm, charges $495 per
hour for this engagement.  The firm's other professionals and
their compensation rates are:

     Professionals                 Hourly Rate
     -------------                 -----------
     Ian Winter, Esq.                 $395
     John Jureller, Esq.              $390
     Sean Southard, Esq.              $350
    
     Designations                  Hourly Rate
     ------------                  -----------
     Associates                    $175 - $300
     Paralegals                       $125

Mr. Klestadt assures the Court that the firm the firm does
not hold any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate and is a
"disintereseted person" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Klestadt can be reached at:

     Tracy L. Klestadt, Esq.
     Klestadt & Winters, LLP
     292 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor
     New York, New York 10017
     Tel: (212) 972-3000

Based in Chicago, Illinois, Bayou Group LLC operates and manages
hedge funds.  The company and its affiliates filed for chapter 11
protection on May 30, 2006 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 06-22306).   
Elise Scherr Frejka, Esq., at Dechert LLP, represents the Debtors
in their restructuring efforts.  Joseph A. Gershman, Esq., and
Robert M. Novick, Esq., at Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman,
LLP, represents the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.   
When the Debtors filed for protection from their creditors, they
estimated assets and debts of more than $100 million.


BAYOU GROUP: Has Until November 30 To File Chapter 11 Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Adlai S. Hardin, Jr., of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York further extended Bayou
Group LLC and its debtor-affiliates' exclusive periods to:

   a. file a Chapter 11 plan until Nov. 30, 2007; and

   b. solicit acceptance of that plan until Jan. 30, 2008.

According to the Debtors, this is the fourth and final request to
further extend their exclusive periods.

As previously reported in the Troubled Company Reporter, the
Debtors filed their Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.  
However, at a Disclosure Statement hearing, Judge Hardin rejected
the Debtors' Amended Disclosure Statement.

Judge Hardin further said that fraudulent conveyance lawsuits
filed by the receiver against investors should continue.

The Debtors disclosed that they withdrew their motion to approve
the Disclosure Statement in light of the complicated legal issues
embodied in the Plan in favor of litigating 119 adversary
proceedings.  The Debtors however intend to seek approval of the
Disclosure Statement within the statutory period of exclusivity.

With respect to the ongoing adversary proceedings, the Debtors'
tell the Court that achievements to date include:

   * reviewing and analyzing preliminary discovery responses of
     defendants in the Adversary Proceedings;

   * filing Amended Complaints in 108 adversary proceedings for
     the benefit of defrauded creditors;

   * defeating motions to dismiss the Amended Complaints filed by
     defendants in 95 of the adversary proceedings;

   * defeating motions for summary judgment filed by defendants in
     24 adversary proceedings;

   * entering into court-approved settlement agreements with
     defendants in 8 adversary proceedings for the benefit of the
     Debtors' estates;

   * negotiating pending settlements with defendants in 39  
     adversary proceedings for the benefit of the Debtors' esates;

   * negotiating a discovery schedule for remaining 72 active
     adversary proceedings that could result in trial or summary       
     judgment motions by the end of 2007.

With respect to the ongoing adversary proceedings, the Debtors'
also said that achievements to date include:

   * reviewing and analyzing preliminary discovery responses of
     defendants in the Adversary Proceedings;

   * filing amended complaints in 113 adversary proceedings for
     the benefit of defrauded creditors;

   * defeating motions to dismiss the amended complaints filed by
     defendants in 95 of the Adversary Proceedings;

   * defeating motions for summary judgment filed by defendants in
     24 adversary proceedings;

   * entering into court-approved settlement agreements with
     defendants in 64 adversary proceedings for the benefit of the
     Debtors' estates;

   * negotiating pending settlements with six defendants in
     adversary proceedings for the benefit of the Debtors'
     estates;

   * negotiating an aggressive discovery schedule for remaining
     active adversary proceedings that could result in trial or
     summary judgment motions by the end of 2007; and

   * conducting depositions nationwide in the 42 active adversary
     proceedings.

The Debtors anticipate that, given this substantial progress on
these critical issues over the past 15 months, they will be able
to further develop and refine within the forthcoming two months an
appropriate, feasible, and equitable Plan that addresses the
resolution of the pending adversary proceedings and the
distribution of funds to the Debtors' defrauded investor
creditors.

Based in Chicago, Illinois, Bayou Group LLC operates and manages
hedge funds.  The company and its affiliates filed for chapter 11
protection on May 30, 2006 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 06-22306).   
Elise Scherr Frejka, Esq., at Dechert LLP, represents the Debtors
in their restructuring efforts.  Joseph A. Gershman, Esq., and
Robert M. Novick, Esq., at Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman,
LLP, represents the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.   
When the Debtors filed for protection from their creditors, they
estimated assets and debts of more than $100 million.


BEAR STEARNS: Foreign Reps. File Opening Appellant Brief
--------------------------------------------------------
Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Master Fund,
Ltd., and Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies
Enhanced Leverage Master Fund, Ltd.,  filed on July 30, 2007,
provisional winding-up proceedings in the Grand Court of Cayman
Islands under the provisions of the Companies Law (2007 Revision)
of the Cayman Islands.  On the same day, the Funds filed
petitions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of New York seeking recognition of the Cayman Islands liquidation
as a foreign main proceedings under Chapter 15 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code.

On July 31, 2007, the Cayman Islands Court appointed Simon Lovell
Clayton Whicker and Kristen Beighton, from KPMG, as the Bear
Stearns Funds' joint provisional liquidators and foreign
representatives.  The Cayman Court converted the provisional
liquidation to official liquidation in September.

In August 2007, Judge Burton R. Lifland of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York denied the Foreign
Representatives' Chapter 15 request finding that each of the
Funds' real seat and their "center of main interest" is the
United States, where they conduct the administration of their
interest on a regular basis, and the Southern District of New
York, where their principal interests, assets and management are
located.

The Foreign Representatives appealed from Judge Lifland's
Decision and asked the U.S. District Court in the Southern
District of New York to determine whether Judge Lifland erred in
finding that (i) the Funds' COMI are not located in the Cayman
Islands, hence their liquidation proceedings there are not
entitled to recognition as foreign main proceedings, and (ii) the
Funds do not have an "establishment" in the Cayman Islands, and
that, therefore, the foreign proceedings are not entitled to
recognition as foreign non-main proceedings.

                 Conflict with Chapter 15 Tenets

On the Foreign Representatives' behalf, Fred S. Hodara, Esq., at
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, in New York, argues that
Judge Lifland's Decision conflicts with the basic tenets of
Chapter 15, which is to foster comity and cooperation between
American and foreign courts.

Mr. Hodara notes that Chapter 15 scholars, including Chapter 15
co-author Prof. Jay Westbrook in his work Locating the Eye of the
Financial Storm, uniformly stress that Chapter 15's purpose of
maximizing cooperation with foreign courts.  Judge Lifland, also
co-author of Chapter 15, in his work, Chapter 15 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code: An Annotated Section-by-Section Analysis,
has recognized the central role played by comity in Chapter 15.

Since Chapter 15 was enacted in 2005, U.S. Courts have granted
comity and recognition to Cayman Islands proceedings including:

   -- In re SPhinX, Ltd., 351 B.R. 103, 112 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
      2006) granting non-main recognition;

   -- In re Amerindo Internet Growth Fund Limited, Chapter 15
      Case No. 07-10327 (RDD)(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. March 7, 2007)
      granting foreign main recognition; and

   -- In re Bancredit Cayman Limited (In Liquidation), Chapter 15
      Case No. 06-11026 (SMB) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 15, 2006)
      granting foreign main recognition.

Mr. Hodara asserts that Chapter 15 was designed to streamline the
process of granting recognition to foreign insolvency proceedings
making it "as simple, fast and inexpensive as possible," by
reducing it to "a simple documentary process, unless challenged."

The United Nations Commission for International Trade Law
reflects the same idea, Mr. Hodara contends, noting that that
UNCITRAL lists, as one of its key objectives, provisions of a
system designed "to provide expedited and direct access for
foreign representatives to the courts of the enacting State" and
to avoid the need to rely on cumbersome and time-consuming
letters rogatory or other forms of diplomatic or consular
communications that might otherwise have to be used."

To obtain approval of a Chapter 15 request, foreign
representatives must demonstrate that the foreign proceeding is
either a "main" or nonmain" proceeding.  A foreign main
proceeding, under Section 1502(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, is one
that is brought in the courts of the country where the debtor has
the COMI is located, while a foreign nonmain proceeding, under
Section 1502(2), is one that is brought in a country outside the
place of a COMI where the debtor has an "establishment," defined
in Section 1502(5), as "any place of operations where the debtor
carries out a nontransitory economic activity."  The Bankruptcy
Code, however, does not defined "nontransitory economic
activity."

Chapter 15 includes a statutory presumption that, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, a foreign debtor's COMI is the place
where its registered offices are located, Mr. Hodara tells the
U.S. District Court.  This statutory presumption, he continues,
may be challenged only on the basis of evidence that the COMI is
in another country, or on the basis of the very narrow public
policy exception in Section 1506, which permits courts to refuse
to take actions manifestly contrary to the public policy of the
United States.

Mr. Hodara further contends that one of the key reasons for
streamlining the recognition process is predictability.  A
predictable recognition process is essential to the insolvent
entity's creditors, he adds.  In considering whether to recognize
foreign insolvency proceedings under Chapter 15, Mr. Hodara notes
that courts and commentators, including the High Court of Ireland
in In re Eurofood IFSC Ltd., Case C-341/04 (Grand Chamber), 2006,
agree that a Bankruptcy Court should heed the goals of respecting
international comity and meeting the reasonable expectations of
creditors.

           Erroneous Interpretation of COMI Presumption

Mr. Hodara tells the District Court that it is undisputed that
the Foreign Debtors submitted all of the requisite documents to
satisfy the threshold requirements for Chapter 15 recognition and
that their place of registration is in the Cayman Islands.  Thus,
Mr. Hodara asserts that the Cayman Islands are the presumptive
site of the Foreign Debtors' COMI.  No interested party has
challenged recognition and there is nothing to suggest that the
Chapter 15 Petitions were filed for anything but the proper
purposes, he adds.

The analysis of the COMI of a hedge fund cannot be considered as
if the hedge fund were a company that manufactures products or
provides services, he explains.  Typically, a hedge fund will
have no office or employees, because, unlike a typical business,
there are no "cooperations" in the traditional sense.  Instead,
hedge funds, by the actions of their boards of directors, enter
into various service contracts with investment managers,
administrators, attorneys, and auditors.  Therefore, he contends,
in the hedge fund context, the pivotal analysis must focus on the
expectations of creditors and investors that the law of the
country where the fund is incorporated will control both prior
to, and after commencement of, any insolvency proceedings.

Mr. Hodara also contends that initiation of the liquidation
proceedings in the Cayman Islands is consistent with the
expectations of the interested parties, which consist of four
investors and less than 20 creditors, many of which were
represented by Cayman Islands counsel before the commencement of
the Cayman Islands proceedings.  

The Bankruptcy Court ignored relevant evidence that buttresses
the presumption that the Foreign Debtors' COMI is in the Cayman
Islands, Mr. Hodara alleges.  The Bankruptcy Court, he points
out, focused on facts set forth in pleadings filed at the very
outset of the Foreign Debtors' Chapter 15 cases before the
Foreign Representatives had had a chance to investigate.  
Evidence presented prior to and during the Chapter 15 Request
hearings showed that Bear Stearns Asset Management, Inc., the
Funds' investment manager, managed investments located in
numerous jurisdictions, including the Cayman Islands and Europe,
he notes.  This is in contrary to the Bankruptcy Court's finding
that the assets managed by BSAM is located in the Southern
District of New York.

Mr. Hodara also alleges that Bankruptcy Court discounted a number
of relevant facts that contradicted its view of the Cayman
Islands office as a "letterbox."  While the Bankruptcy Court
acknowledged that two of High-Grade Fund' three investors are
registered Cayman Islands companies, it dismissed this fact on
the grounds that the investors were exempted foreign entities.

The Bankruptcy Court gave no consideration to the fact that on
the appointment of the Foreign Representatives as joint
provisional liquidators, the powers of the boards of directors
ceased and the absolute control of the Foreign Debtors was
transferred to Cayman Islands-based official liquidators, Mr.
Hodara says.

Moreover, Mr. Hodara alleges that the Bankruptcy Court completely
ignored other facts adduced at the August 27 hearing on the
Foreign Debtors' Chapter 15 Petition request, namely that:

   (a) the Foreign Debtors' prepetition attorneys are in the
       Cayman Islands;

   (b) the Foreign Debtors' prepetition auditors, Deloitte &
       Touche, performed auditing work in the Cayman Islands;

   (c) most, if not all, of the Foreign Debtors' remaining liquid
       assets are in bank accounts in the Cayman Islands;

   (d) the Foreign Representatives and the Foreign Debtors are
       governed by the laws and regulations of the Cayman
       Islands, where the only foreign proceedings, other than
       the Chapter 15 cases, are pending;

   (e) the Foreign Debtors are subject to Cayman Islands tax law
       and are not subject to U.S. income tax; and

   (f) the Foreign Debtors' investments included collateralized
       debt obligations constituted under Cayman Islands law.

Furthermore, Mr. Hodara alleges that the Bankruptcy Court erred
in failing to recognize the Foreign Proceedings as foreign
nonmain proceedings because the Foreign Debtors have
"establishments" in the Cayman Islands.

Mr. Hodara says the Foreign Representatives' evidentiary showing
of the business conducted in the Cayman Islands amply supports
recognition of the Cayman Islands proceedings at least as
foreign non-main proceedings based on a "place of operations
where the debtor carries out a non-transitory economic activity."

Accordingly, the Foreign Representatives asks the District Court
to reverse Judge Lifland's denial of their Chapter 15 request,
and recognize the Foreign Proceedings as foreign main proceedings
or, in the alternative, foreign non-main proceedings.

                   About Bear Stearns Funds

Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands-based Bear Stearns High-Grade
Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Master Fund Ltd.
and Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Master
Fund Ltd. are open-ended investment companies, which sought high
income and capital appreciation relative to the London Interbank
Offered Rate, and designed for long-term investors.

On July 30, 2007, the Funds filed winding up petitions under the
Companies Law (2007 Revision) of the Cayman Islands.  Simon Lovell
Clayton Whicker and Kristen Beighton at KPMG were appointed joint
provisional liquidators.  The joint liquidators filed for Chapter
15 petitions before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York the next day.  On August 30, 2007, the
Honorable Burton R. Lifland denied the Funds protection under
Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Fred S. Hodara, Esq., Lisa G. Beckerman, Esq., and David F.
Staber, Esq., at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, represent the
liquidators in the United States.  The Funds' assets and debts are
estimated to be more than $100,000,000 each.  (Bear Stearns Funds
Bankruptcy News; Bankruptcy Creditors' Service Inc.;
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


BEAR STEARNS: Massachusetts Files Admin. Complaint Against BSAM
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Enforcement Section of the Massachusetts Securities Division
in the office of Secretary of State William F. Galvin filed an
administrative complaint against Bear Stearns Asset Management,
Inc., for violating the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act and
relevant regulations.  

Since September 1, 2003, until 2007, BSAM is the investment
manager of Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies
Master Fund, Ltd., and Bear Stearns High-Grade Structure Credit
Strategies Enhanced Fund, Ltd., which filed for liquidation
proceedings in the Grand Court of Cayman Islands in July 2007 as
a result of the collapse of the U.S. sub-prime mortgage market.
BSAM solicited investors for the Cayman Funds.

The Complaint asserts that BSAM was trading securities, including
mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations,
from its own account with hedge funds it advised without properly
notifying the client funds' independent directors, as required by
federal and state securities laws as well as its own prospectus
disclosures and representations.  Under the Complaint, the
transactions that required prior approval from the Cayman Funds'
independent directors, 78.95% did not receive approval in 2006,
58.66% in 2005, 29.73% in 2004, and 18% in 2003.

Through the Complaint, the Enforcement Section wants to censure
BSAM and to take further action as may be deemed just and
appropriate by the hearing officer for the protection of
investors.  It also requires BSAM to (i) permanently cease and
desist from violating the Act and Regulations and (ii) pay an
administrative fine in an amount as may be determined.

Michael Regan, Esq., staff attorney of the Enforcement Section,
in Boston, Massachusetts, notes that the Investment Act of 1940
bars an investment adviser from engaging in principal
transactions with an advisory client "without disclosing to such
client in writing before the completion of such transaction the
capacity in which he is acting and obtaining the consent of the
client to such transaction."

The disclosure and consent procedure was known as a Principal
Trade Letter at BSAM, Mr. Regan said.  The PTL was designed as a
tool to minimize and control conflicts of interest between BSAM,
Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., the Cayman Funds, and other investment
vehicles managed by BSAM.

The Complaint also asserted that BSAM failed to carry out its
obligations with regard to principal transactions from 2004 to
2007.  Mr. Regan pointed out that BSAM staff "with responsibility
for PTLs were uncertain as to when and why PTLs were necessary."  
BSAM neither trained nor oversaw the people who were supposed to
obtain approvals on principal trades from the Cayman Funds'
directors.  

Because the consent of the independent directors was not obtained
for many principal transactions, as required by federal law and
the BSAM offering documents, BSAM has violated the Massachusetts
Uniform Securities Act, Mr. Regan alleged.

"Investors are entitled to know when their investment adviser has
some stake in the other side of the deal, as Congress realized
back in 1940.  Investors must also be able to rely on truthful
information and representations provided in an Offering
Memorandum.  Bear Stearns Asset Management did not do what the
law and its own disclosures assured investors that it would do,"
Secretary Galvin said in a press release.

"The cavalier attitude that this company had about its various
conflicts of interest is intolerable.  This is a case that
demonstrates why existing rules regulating principal transactions
are so important for investors," Mr. Galvin continued.

"This begins to explain how the sub-prime genie got out of the
bottle," Mr. Galvin told the Associated Press.

William O'Connor, Esq., at Crowell & Moring, in New York, related
to AP that the Complaint "is an indication that there are a lot
more problems that are going to come out" involving alleged
conflicts of interest in mortgage-related investments.  "It's not
just about writing off losses.  You're going to see more and more
claims like this come forward," Mr. O'Connor continued.

To recall, the Securities Division of Mr. Galvin's office had
conducted a probe on whether the Funds' informed its independent
directors before engaging in trading transactions.

                   About Bear Stearns Funds

Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands-based Bear Stearns High-Grade
Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Master Fund Ltd.
and Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Master
Fund Ltd. are open-ended investment companies, which sought high
income and capital appreciation relative to the London Interbank
Offered Rate, and designed for long-term investors.

On July 30, 2007, the Funds filed winding up petitions under the
Companies Law (2007 Revision) of the Cayman Islands.  Simon Lovell
Clayton Whicker and Kristen Beighton at KPMG were appointed joint
provisional liquidators.  The joint liquidators filed for Chapter
15 petitions before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York the next day.  On August 30, 2007, the
Honorable Burton R. Lifland denied the Funds protection under
Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Fred S. Hodara, Esq., Lisa G. Beckerman, Esq., and David F.
Staber, Esq., at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, represent the
liquidators in the United States.  The Funds' assets and debts are
estimated to be more than $100,000,000 each.  (Bear Stearns Funds
Bankruptcy News; Bankruptcy Creditors' Service Inc.;
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


BELL MICRO: Has Until January 31 to Comply with Nasdaq Listing
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bell Microproducts Inc. has received the decision of the board of
directors of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC granting to the company
until Jan. 31, 2008, to become compliant with the NASDAQ's
continued listing requirements.

The company also has received an additional staff determination
letter from NASDAQ stating that the company is not in compliance
with the requirements for continued listing pursuant to NASDAQ
Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(14), due to its failure to file its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended Sept. 30,
2007, on a timely basis.

This staff determination notice serves as an additional basis for
delisting the company's common stock from trading on NASDAQ.  The
company's common stock continues to trade on the NASDAQ Global
Market under the symbol "BELM," however, after Jan. 31, 2008, the
company's securities are subject to be delisted from trading.
    
The company is working to complete its financial restatements in
order to comply with its SEC filing requirements.  The company is
in the process of correcting identified errors in its financial
statements, including the accounting impacts associated with its
review of the company's historical stock option grant practices.

In addition to the accounting impact of its stock option
review, the company is also reviewing its historical accounting
treatment for certain reserves, accruals, and other accounting
estimates.  A committee of independent directors has been
appointed to complete this review.

                    About Bell Microproducts

Headquartered in San Jose, California, Bell Microproducts Inc.
(Nasdaq: BELM) -- http://www.bellmicro.com/-- is an       
international, value-added distributor of high-tech products,
solutions and services, including storage systems, servers,
software, computer components and peripherals, as well as
maintenance and professional services.  Bell is a Fortune 1000
company that has operations in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and
Mexico.

                         *     *     *

The company has received waivers from its lenders into March 2008
relating to the filing of financial reports with the SEC and the
provision of audited financial reports.


BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL: Moody's Withdraws Ratings on Term Loans
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service withdrew its proposed ratings on
Bombardier Recreational Products Ba2 senior secured revolver and
B1 senior secured term loan assigned on June 2007, following the
company's decision to postpone the offering due to current market
conditions.  At the same time, Moody's affirmed BRP's B1 corporate
family rating, B1 probability of default rating, the existing Ba2
rating of the senior secured revolver due 2011, and the B1 rating
of the senior secured term loan due 2013.  The rating outlook
continues to be negative.

"The negative outlook principally reflects Moody's concern that
consumer spending both in North America and in Europe, but
primarily in the United States, will soften in the near term
putting pressure on the company's operating performance," said
Kevin Cassidy, Vice President/Senior Credit Officer at Moody's
Investors Service.  "Although Moody's recognizes the operational
improvements the company has made over the last couple of years,
it has returned most of its profitability to shareholders in the
past" noted Cassidy.  He further stated that "Moody's expects that
the company will again lever up to improve shareholder return once
the capital markets improve"

BRP's rating could be downgraded if adjusted leverage approaches
5.5x either because of moderating operating performance or a
material increase in leverage or a combination of both.  On the
other hand, "the rating outlook could be stabilized if BRP
continues to improve its operating performance despite an expected
decline in consumer spending and maintains adjusted leverage
around 5x, even if it levers up for a dividend/share repurchase"
noted Cassidy.

Moody's subscribers can find additional information in the BRP
Credit Opinion published on Moodys.com.

Ratings withdrawn:

  -- CDN$250 million senior secured revolver, due 2012, at Ba2;

  -- CDN$1,125 million senior secured term loan, due 2013, at
     B1;

Ratings affirmed/assessments revised:

  -- Corporate family rating at B1;

  -- Probability of default rating at B1;

  -- CDN$250 million senior secured revolver, due 2011, at Ba2
     (to LGD 2, 28% from LGD 2, 25%);

  -- $720 million senior secured term loan, due 2013, at B1(to
     LGD 4, 54% from LGD 4, 51%)

With corporate headquarters in Valcourt, Quebec, Bombardier
Recreational Products Inc. is a leading designer, manufacturer,
and distributor of motorized recreational products worldwide. Net
sales for the twelve-month period ended July 2007 were
approximately CDN$2.8 billion.


BORGWARNER CAPITAL: Moody's Reviews Preferred Shelf's  Rating
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed BorgWarner Inc.'s Baa2 Senior
Unsecured rating under review for possible upgrade.  The action is
prompted by debt reduction funded by stronger earnings and
significant free cash flow generated over the last nine months,
and follows the company's affirmation of 2007 guidance towards the
higher-end of earlier ranges.  During 2007 cash flows from the
company's wholly-owned operations have been applied to lower
balance sheet indebtedness at the parent level.  As a result,
BorgWarner's leverage and coverage metrics based upon its wholly-
owned operations have shown progressive improvement and are
approaching or exceeding levels that existed prior to the 2005
debt financed acquisition of a majority interest in BERU AG.

Moody's anticipates BorgWarner's global and customer
diversification, participation in several product areas with
leadership positions and growth prospects, and improving backlog
of business awards should permit these trends to continue.  The
review will focus on the sustainability of these developments,
including an assessment of the company's liquidity profile, and
the extent to which debt protection ratios may show incremental
progress.  In addition, the review will consider the role which
acquisitions may play in the company's strategy and the impact
which its plans for shareholder returns could have on debt
protection measures over the intermediate term.

Ratings placed under review for possible upgrade:

BorgWarner Inc.

   * Senior Unsecured, Baa2
   * Subordinate Shelf, (P)Baa3
   * Preferred Shelf, (P)Ba1

BorgWarner Capital Trusts, I, II, and III

   * Shelf ratings for Trust preferred, (P)Baa3

The last rating action was on May 24, 2007 when the ratings'
outlook was changed to positive from stable.

BorgWarner Inc., headquartered in Auburn Hills, MI, is a global
tier-1 automotive supplier focused on engine and drivetrain
products.  In 2006, revenues were approximately $4.6 billion. The
company operates manufacturing and technical facilities in 64
locations in 17 countries.


BOWIE RESOURCES: Sixth Circuit Sheds Light on Sec. 363 Asset Sale
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a
district court ruling stating that any sale related claim would be
extinguished by a Section 363 sale order unless expressly assumed
in an asset purchase agreement.

The Sixth Circuit's decision relates to a bankruptcy court
approved sale of Bowie Resources Limited's assets to, and
assumption of Bowie's executory contracts by, Appalachian Fuels
LLC, pursuant to an asset purchase agreement.  

                       TVA Contract Dispute

Al Perry Enterprises Inc., acting as sales agent for Bowie in
securing coal supply contracts, paid a commission on sales of coal
pursuant to the contracts.  One of the contracts was with the
Tennessee Valley Authority.  

A dispute arose between Bowie and Perry regarding Bowie's
obligation to pay commissions to Perry in connection with the TVA
contract.

As a result, Perry filed suit against Bowie in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

The case was resolved by the entry of an agreed judgment which
required Bowie to continue paying commissions to Perry in
connection with its sale of coal to TVA.  The agreed judgment also
required Bowie, should it enter bankruptcy proceedings, to assume
its contractual obligations to Perry under the agreed judgment.

                       Sec. 363 Asset Sale

Bowie and several related entities later commenced voluntary
Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases in the Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Kentucky at Ashland.  Bowie operated as a
debtor-in-possession until October 2003, and paid commissions to
Perry until July 2003.

On Sept. 12, 2003, the bankruptcy court entered an order
establishing auction procedures for the sale of Bowie's assets and
the assumption and assignment of executory contracts and unexpired
leases.

Bowie initially entered into an asset purchase agreement with JJM
Energy LLC for substantially all of Bowie's assets and the
assumption and assignment of executory contracts and unexpired
leases, including the TVA contract.

In accordance with the bankruptcy court's established auction
procedures, a notice of the proposed sale and t