T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

           Wednesday, November 14, 2007, Vol. 11, No. 270

                             Headlines



1031 TAX GROUP: Chap. 11 Trustee Taps Kaufman as Virginia Counsel
1031 TAX GROUP: Chapter 11 Trustee Taps SEKO as Aircraft Broker
ACE SECURITIES: S&P Holds BB+ Rating on Class B-1 Certificates
AMERICAN HOME: Court Denies UBS Request for Stay of $500M Sale
AMERICAN HOME: Asks Court to Compel Triad to Honor Claims

AMERICAN HOME: Competes w/ Bear Stearns Over Rights to $1.8MM Fund
AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY: Moody's Holds Ba2 Rating on 2001B Bonds
BEXAR COUNTY: Performance Decline Prompts Moody's to Cut Ratings
BLAST ENERGY: Plan Confirmation Hearing Deferred to November 28
BOMBAY CO: Taps DJM Realty to Dispose U.S. Retail Store Leases

BRITISH AMERICAN HOMES: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
C2K2 MOTORS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
CAITHNESS COSO: Extends Pricing Date of Notes & Bonds Offering
CALPINE CORP: Creditor & Equity Panel Backs Claims Objection Plea
CAMBER 7: Moody's Junks Rating on $11.25 Mil. Floating Rate Notes

CANARGO ENERGY: Posts $9.96 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
CASH TECH: Arranges $750,000 of New Funding for its Cash Needs
CD 2007-CD5: S&P Puts Low-B Ratings on Six Certificate Classes
CETUS ABS: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Four Note Classes
CHARLES BOOTHE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

CHARYS HOLDING:  Miller Ray Houser Raises Going Concern Doubt
COMPUTER WORLDS: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
CONNACHER OIL: Moody's Rates $600 Million Pending Notes Offering
CONSTELLATION BRANDS: Buying Fortune's Wine Biz for $885 Million
CONSTELLATION BRANDS: Fortune Deal Cues Fitch to Hold Ratings

COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL: Loan Fundings Drops 48% in October 2007
DANA CORP: Judge Lifland Rejects Jasco's $20 Million Claim
DANA CORP: Wants to Settle Asbestos Claims for $2 Million
DANA CORP: Ad Hoc Asbestos Committee Balks at Proposed Settlement
DARDENNE ANIMAL: Case Summary & 15 Largest Unsecured Creditors

DELAWARE AVENUE: Case Summary & 10 Largest Unsecured Creditors
DIOGENES CDO: Moody's Junks Rating on $16 Mil. Floating Rate Notes
DISTRIBUTED ENERGY: Posts $15.2 Million Net Loss in 3rd Quarter
DOLLAR FINANCIAL: Moody's Lifts Corporate Family Rating to B2
DON RODDAM: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

DONNIE DUNN: Case Summary & Five Largest Unsecured Creditors
DUKE FUNDING: Bad Credit Quality Cues Moody's to Downgrade Ratings
DUKE FUNDING: Moody's Cuts Ratings on EUR67 Mil. Notes to Ba2
E*TRADE FINANCIAL: Shares Down 59%; Bankruptcy Risk Raised
ECHOSTAR COMMS: Earns $200 Million in 3rd Quarter Ended Sept. 30

ENTERPRISE GP: Fitch Rates $850MM Sr. Secured Term Loan at BB
EQUIFIRST MORTGAGE: Moody's Puts Low-B Rated Certs. on Neg. Watch
EXCO RESOURCES: Earns $10.7MM in Third Quarter Ended Sept. 30
FINLAY ENTERPRISES: Completes $200MM Buy of Zale's Bailey Asset
FREMONT GENERAL: Board Names Stephen Gordon as Chairman and CEO

G-I HOLDINGS: Wants Exclusive Period Further Extended to April 30
GMAC MORTGAGE: Fitch Affirms 'B' Ratings on Three Classes
GRAPHIC PACKAGING: S&P Holds All Ratings and Revises Outlook
GREAT ALLIANCE: Case Summary & Five Largest Unsecured Creditors
GREGORY LEGGOTT: Case Summary & Eight Largest Unsecured Creditors

HERBST GAMING: EBITDA Decline Prompts Moody's to Pare Rating to B2
HIDDEN SPLENDOR: Court Approves White Law as Bankruptcy Counsel
HIDDEN SPLENDOR: U.S. Trustee Appoints Five-Member Creditors Panel
HIDDEN SPLENDOR: McGuirewoods Approved as Committee's Counsel
HOMEBANC CORP: Wants Until March 6 to Remove Civil Actions

HOMEBANC CORP: Wants to Lease-Decision Period Extended to March 6
INDYMAC: Moody's Junks Ratings on Five Certificate Classes
INPHONIC INC: Organization Meeting Scheduled This Friday
INPHONIC INC: Faces Nasdaq Delisting Due to Bankruptcy Filing
INSITE VISION: Sept. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $1.9 Million

INTERGRAPH CORP: Good Performance Prompts S&P to Lift Rating
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES: Likely to File for Bankruptcy, Reinert Says
IRON MOUNTAIN: High Debt Leverage Cues S&P to Revise Outlook
LEVTIZ FURNITURE: Seeks Court OK to Employ Jones Day as Counsel
LEVITZ FURNITURE: Wants to Hire Young Conaway as Conflicts Counsel

LEVITZ FURNITURE: Wants Until December 21 to File Schedules
LIBERTY TAX: Sept. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $10.2 Million
LIMITED BRANDS: October 2007 Sales Drop 6% to $644.7 Million
MARKOV CDO: Moody's Cuts Ratings on $32 Million Notes to Ba3
MATTRESS GALLERY: US Trustee Appoints Five-Member Creditors Panel

MATTRESS GALLERY: Gets Interim Okay to Access OMG DIP Financing
MEDFORD CROSSINGS: Laurel Creditors Wants Automatic Stay Lifted
MEDFORD CROSSINGS: Lender Wants Obermayer Disqualified as Counsel
MEDQUEST INC: Novant Merger Cues S&P to Retain Positive Watch
MGM MIRAGE: Develops Kansas Resort Casino with Foxwoods & Sumner

MIRANT CORP: Fitch Removes Ratings from Negative Watch
MNK INVESTMENTS: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
MOVIE GALLERY: Court Defers Hearing on Leases' Auction to Nov. 28
MOVIE GALLERY: Resolves Objections Auction of Leases
MOVIE GALLERY: Securities Delisted from NASDAQ

MQ ASSOCIATES: Unit Completes $45MM Merger with Novant Health
MQ ASSOCIATES: Offers to Purchase $316 Million of Senior Notes
MUSIC WORLD: Put Under Bankruptcy by Owners; To Close by January
MYLOTTE DAVID: Organizational Meeting Scheduled on November 19
NATIONAL ENERGY: Board to Liquidate Assets and Dissolve Company

NATIONAL MONEY: Moody's Lifts Senior Secured Rating to B2 from B3
NEUMANN HOMES: U.S. Trustee Appoints Seven-Member Creditors Panel
NEUMANN HOMES: Ad Hoc Group of Secured Trade Creditors Formed
OCCULOGIX INC: Posts $19.7 Million Net Loss in Qtr. Ended Sept. 30
OPEN TEXT: Successful Integration Cues S&P's Stable Outlook

ORBITZ WORLDWIDE: Posts $32 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
POINT PLEASANT: Moody's Junks Rating on $32 Million Notes
PRIMUS TELECOMMS: Has $445.6 Mil. Equity Deficit at Sept. 30
PRINCETON SKI: Organizational Meeting Scheduled on November 19
PSEG ENERGY: Stand-Alone Credit Cues S&P to Hold 'BB-' Rating

SCO GROUP: Wants Cattleback Settlement Agreement Approved
SILVER ELMS: Moody's Places Notes' Low-B Ratings Under Neg. Watch
STATION CASINOS: Sept. 30 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $290MM
STATION CASINOS: Completes Merger Deal with FCP Acquisition
TAUBMAN CENTERS: Fitch Holds 'BB' Issuer Default Rating

TERWIN MORTGAGE: Poor Credit Support Cues S&P to Lower Ratings
TRANSTEC INC: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
TRUESTAR BARNETT: Wants Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Dismissed
TWIN PEAKS FINANCIAL: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
TYSON FOODS: Outlines International Expansion Plans

TYSON FOODS: Earns $32 Million in Fourth Qtr. Ended Sept. 30
VIRAGEN INC: AMEX to Delist Stock Effective November 19
WENDY'S INTERNATIONAL: Fidelity National Cancels Planned Bid
WESTAR ENERGY: Plans Public Offering of 7.6 Mil. Shares of Stock
WESTLAKE CHEMICAL: Earns $38 Million in Third Quarter of 2007

WILLIAMS COS: S&P Lifts Ratings on Four Certs. from BB+ to BBB-

* Moody's Downgrades Ratings on 64 Impac-backed Tranches

* Beard Group's Featured Audio Conference for November 2007

* Upcoming Meetings, Conferences and Seminars



                             *********

1031 TAX GROUP: Chap. 11 Trustee Taps Kaufman as Virginia Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gerard A. McHale, Jr., the Chapter 11 Trustee for 1031 Tax Group
LLC and its debtor-affiliates ask the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York for authority to
employ Kaufman & Canoles as his special Virginia counsel, nunc pro
tunc Oct. 24, 2007.

As the Trustee's special Virginia counsel, Kaufman & Canoles will
render legal services as the Trustee may request that relate to
the Virginia Debtors, criminal investigation and additional
necessary legal services in Virginia.

The firm's attorneys will charge at an hourly rate between $320
and $300 for this engagement.

Dennis T. Lewandowski, Esq., a partner of the firm, assures the
Court that the firm does not hold any interest adverse to the
Debtors' estate and is a "disinterested person" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Lewandowski can be reached at:

   Dennis T. Lewandowshi, Esq.
   2101 Parks Avenue, Suite 700
   Post Office Box 626
   Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451
   Tel: (757) 491-4000
   Fax: (757) 491-4020
   http://www.kaufmanandcanoles.com/

                      Virginia Matters

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Oct. 29, 2007, the
Court approved an agreement entered into by the Debtors, the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, and Edward H. Okun, the
owner of The 1031 Tax Group.  The agreement, dated Oct. 11, 2007,
provides for the transfer of all of Mr. Okun's assets to the
Debtors.

However, with the appointment of Mr. McHale as the Debtors'
chapter 11 trustee, under the agreement, Mr. McHale will become
successor to the Debtors.

Mr. McHale relates that included in the transfer are three
entities controlled by Mr. Okun namely:

    (1) IPofA West Oaks Mall, L.P.
    (2) IPofA West Oaks LeaseCo; and
    (3) IPofA WOM Master LeaseCo, L.P.

These three entities filed voluntary chapter 11 petitions on
Oct. 2, 2007, with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia.

A copy of these entities' case summary was published in the
Troubled Company Reporter on October 4.

                    About The 1031 Tax Group

Headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, The 1031 Tax Group LLC --
http://www.ixg1031.com/-- is a privately held consolidated group  
of qualified intermediaries created to service real property
exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.  The
company and 15 of its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection
on May 14, 2007 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 07-11447 through
07-11462).  Paul Traub, Esq., Norman N. Kinel, Esq., and Steven E.
Fox, Esq., at Dreier LLP, represent the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  The Debtors selected Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC as their claims agent.  Thomas J. Weber, Esq.,
Melanie L. Cyganowski, Esq., and Allen G. Kadish, Esq., at
Greenberg Traurig, LLP, represent the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors.  As of Sept. 30, 2007, the Debtors had total
assets of $164,231,012 and total liabilities of $168,126,294,
resulting in a total stockholders' deficit of $3,895,282.

Gerard A. McHale, Jr., was appointed as the Debtors' chapter 11
trustee on Oct. 25, 2007.


1031 TAX GROUP: Chapter 11 Trustee Taps SEKO as Aircraft Broker
---------------------------------------------------------------
Gerard A. McHale, Jr., the Chapter 11 Trustee for 1031 Tax Group
LLC and its debtor-affiliates asks the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York for permission to
employ SEKO Enterprises Inc. as his aircraft broker.

Under the terms of the broker agreement dates Nov. 1, 2007, SEKO
Enterprises will assist the Trustee in selling a Lear 25D jet,
Bell 206 B-3 helicopter and 1969 Gulfstream II in 120 days.

In addition, the Trustee says that the agreement provides a 5%
commission of the proceeds of the sale.  The Trustee further says
that SEKO Enterprises will charge 6% commission for the 1969
Gulfstreem.

The Trustee relates that in June 2007 the firm entered into a
brokerage contract with certain entities controlled by Edward H.
Okun, the owner of 1031 Tax Group LLC, to sell these aicrafts,
plus a 1970 Gulfstream IIB jet.  On Oct. 11, 2007, the 1970
Gulstream jet was sold for $2.75 million.

George W. Owen, the vice president of the firm, assures the Court
that the firm does not hold any interest adverse to the Debtors'
estate and is a "disinterested person" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Owen can be reached at:

   George W. Owen
   SEKO Enterprises Inc.
   910 Athens Highway
   Suite K, #110
   Loganville, GA 30052
   Tel: (770) 979-8913
   Fax: (770) 736-1682
   http://www.sekoent.com/

                    About The 1031 Tax Group

Headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, The 1031 Tax Group LLC --
http://www.ixg1031.com/-- is a privately held consolidated group  
of qualified intermediaries created to service real property
exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.  The
company and 15 of its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection
on May 14, 2007 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 07-11447 through
07-11462).  Paul Traub, Esq., Norman N. Kinel, Esq., and Steven E.
Fox, Esq., at Dreier LLP, represent the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  The Debtors selected Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC as their claims agent.  Thomas J. Weber, Esq.,
Melanie L. Cyganowski, Esq., and Allen G. Kadish, Esq., at
Greenberg Traurig, LLP, represent the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors.  As of Sept. 30, 2007, the Debtors had total
assets of $164,231,012 and total liabilities of $168,126,294,
resulting in a total stockholders' deficit of $3,895,282.

Gerard A. McHale, Jr., was appointed as the Debtors' chapter 11
trustee on Oct. 25, 2007.


ACE SECURITIES: S&P Holds BB+ Rating on Class B-1 Certificates
--------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its ratings on the 30
remaining classes of asset-backed pass-through certificates from
five Ace Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust series issued
between 2004 and 2006
     
The affirmations reflect adequate actual and projected credit
support percentages.  As of the October 2007 remittance period,
cumulative realized losses were 1.23%, 3.41%, 1.31%, 1.40%, and
0.83% of the original pool balances for series 2004-SD1, 2005-SD2,
2005-SD3, 2006-SD1, and 2006-SD2, respectively.  Severely
delinquent loans (90-plus days, foreclosures, and REOs) were
12.53%, 27.16%, 23.81%, 50.94%, 56.70% of the current pool
balances for the same respective deals.
     
Series 2004-SD1 is 36 months seasoned and is at its
overcollateralization target level of 0.75%; approximately 37.73%
of the original pool principal balance is outstanding.  Series
2005-SD2 is 27 months seasoned and is close to its O/C target
level of 7.30%; approximately 41.84% of the original
pool principal balance is outstanding.  Series 2005-SD3 is 22
months seasoned and is close to its O/C target level of 3.78%;
approximately 54.22% of the original pool principal balance is
outstanding. Series 2006-SD1 is 18 months seasoned and is close to
its O/C target level of 7.65%; approximately 53.16% of the
original pool principal balance is outstanding.  Series 2006-SD2
is 15 months seasoned and is close to its O/C target level of
5.10%; approximately 60.22% of the original pool principal balance
is outstanding.
     
Subordination, O/C, and excess spread provide credit support for
these series.  The collateral consists primarily of reperforming,
fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured primarily by
first and second liens on one- to four-family residential
properties.  


                        Ratings Affirmed

          Ace Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust
             Asset-backed pass-through certificates

           Series           Class              Rating
           ------           -----              ------
           2004-SD1         A-1                AAA
           2004-SD1         M-1                AA
           2004-SD1         M-2                A
           2004-SD1         M-3                BBB
           2004-SD1         M-4                BBB-
           2005-SD2         A-1                AAA
           2005-SD2         M-1                AA
           2005-SD2         M-2                A
           2005-SD2         M-3                BBB+
           2005-SD2         M-4                BBB
           2005-SD2         M-5                BBB-
           2005-SD3         A-1                AAA
           2005-SD3         M-1                AA+
           2005-SD3         M-2                A+
           2005-SD3         M-3                A-
           2005-SD3         M-4                BBB+
           2005-SD3         M-5                BBB
           2005-SD3         B-1                BB+
           2006-SD1         A-1B               AAA
           2006-SD1         M-1                AA+
           2006-SD1         M-2                AA
           2006-SD1         M-3                A+
           2006-SD1         M-4                A
           2006-SD1         M-5                A-
           2006-SD2         A                  AAA
           2006-SD2         M-1                AA+
           2006-SD2         M-2                AA-
           2006-SD2         M-3                A
           2006-SD2         M-4                A
           2006-SD2         M-5                BBB+


AMERICAN HOME: Court Denies UBS Request for Stay of $500M Sale
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware denied
UBS Real Estate Securities, Inc.'s request that the Court stay
its order approving the sale of mortgage loan servicing business
of American Home Mortgage and Investment Corp. and its debtor-
affiliates to AHM Acquisition Co., Inc., for approximately
$500,000,000, pending its appeal on the sale order.

UBS has already notified the Bankruptcy Court that it will appeal
before the U.S. District Court for the District Court of Delaware
that it will appeal the sale order, which allows the Debtors to
transfer rights to service mortgage loans with unpaid balance of
at least $38,000,000,000 to Wilbur Ross' AHM Acquisition.

UBS filed a request to stay the order as a "joinder" to a
request by DB Structured Products Inc.'s request for a stay,
pending appeal, of the sale order to the extent that it includes
the transfer of the Debtors' rights and obligations arising out
of a master mortgage loan purchase and servicing agreement
between the Debtors and DBSP.  DBSP, however, withdrew its
request following an amendment to the AHM Acquisition asset
purchase agreement, which amendment removed the DBSP servicing
rights from the list of servicing agreements to be transfered to
the buyer.

American Home told Bankruptcy Court Judge Christopher S. Sontchi
that UBS has not standing to appeal the sale order.  The Debtor
said that UBS is not a "person aggrieved" by the order because it
has already transferred its interest in all of the mortgage loans
it owned under the mortgage loan purchase and servicing
agreements, as well as certain securitization trusts.  The
securitization trusts, filed objections to the sale of the
Debtors' mortgage loan servicing business, actively participated
in the hearing to approve the sale, and ultimately consented to
the sale order.

American Home also said that there is an immediate need for the
Debtors to complete a sale of their servicing business.  It said
that parties, including federal agencies, would likely seek to
terminate their servicing agreements with the Debtors should AHM
Acquisition walk away from the sale.  The Debtor said that,
should the stay be granted, UBS should be required to post a bond
of $500,000,000, equivalent to the purchase price, to secure the
Debtors from loss in the event a closing of the sale will not
subsequently occur.

Based in Melville, New York, American Home Mortgage Investment
Corp. (NYSE: AHM) -- http://www.americanhm.com/-- is a mortgage  
real estate investment trust engaged in the business of investing
in mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans resulting from
the securitization of residential mortgage loans originated and
serviced by its subsidiaries.

American Home Mortgage and seven affiliates filed for chapter 11
protection on Aug. 6, 2007 (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 07-11047
through 07-11054).  James L. Patton, Jr., Esq., Joel A. Waite,
Esq., and Pauline K. Morgan, Esq. at Young, Conaway, Stargatt &
Taylor LLP represent the Debtors.  Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC
acts as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.  The Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors has selected Hahn & Hessen LLP
as its counsel.  As of March 31, 2007, American Home Mortgage's
balance sheet showed total assets of $20,553,935,000, total
liabilities of $19,330,191,000.  The Debtors' exclusive period to
file a plan expires on Dec. 4, 2007.  (American Home Bankruptcy
News, Issue No. 15, Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc.,
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).  


AMERICAN HOME: Asks Court to Compel Triad to Honor Claims
---------------------------------------------------------
American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc., together with American
Home Mortgage Investment Corp. and American Home Mortgage
Servicing, Inc., filed a complaint against Triad Guaranty
Insurance Corp. concerning Triad's refusal to honor claims that
American Home submitted under its policy.

James L. Patton Jr., at Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware, relates that as a mortgage originator,
American Home protects itself against the potential economic harm
occasioned by borrower defaults through insurance policies,
including the Triad policy.

On December 13, 2005, American Home and Triad entered into a
Master Policy Agreement, pursuant to which Triad agreed to pay
American Home for certain losses arising from homeowner defaults
on certain loans originated by American Home.  The insurance
contract excluded coverage if, during origination, American Home
inadvertently relied on misrepresentations of borrowers or
appraisers.

In July 2007, at least 14 borrowers of mortgage loans originated
by American Home in 2005 and 2006 defaulted on their loans and
failed to repay American Home.

Mr. Patton recalls that after Triad reviewed the Defaulted Loans,
it allegedly uncovered irregularities that existed at the time
the American Home originated the Defaulted Loans, including:

   (a) a purportedly negligent analysis by property appraisers;

   (b) alleged misrepresentations by the borrower of their income
       and existing mortgage debts; and

   (c) allegedly incomplete loan applications.

In September 2007, Triad informed the Debtors that it was
canceling its certification of American Home's insurance coverage
for the 14 Defaulted Loans.

Mr. Patton explains that the Debtors may recover a portion of  
their losses brought by the defaulting borrowers' failure to make
mortgage payments through foreclosure and sales, however, the
sales in the aggregate cannot compensate the Debtors losses
occasioned by Triad's refusal to cover the Debtors' Claims.

In the aggregate, Triad's refusal to honor the claims will cost
the Debtor a net loss of $1,132,105, Mr. Patton says.

Mr. Patton asserts that Triad is obligated to pay the Debtors'
insurance claims for the defaulted loans under the Federal
Declaratory Judgment Act 2201 of Chapter 28 of the United States
Code.

Accordingly, the Debtors ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware to compel Triad to honor the claims that
American Home submitted under its policy, and award the Debtors
costs and attorney's fees.

Based in Melville, New York, American Home Mortgage Investment
Corp. (NYSE: AHM) -- http://www.americanhm.com/-- is a mortgage
real estate investment trust engaged in the business of investing
in mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans resulting from
the securitization of residential mortgage loans originated and
serviced by its subsidiaries.

American Home Mortgage and seven affiliates filed for chapter 11
protection on Aug. 6, 2007 (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 07-11047
through 07-11054).  James L. Patton, Jr., Esq., Joel A. Waite,
Esq., and Pauline K. Morgan, Esq. at Young, Conaway, Stargatt &
Taylor LLP represent the Debtors.  Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC
acts as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.  The Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors has selected Hahn & Hessen LLP as
its counsel.  As of March 31, 2007, American Home Mortgage's
balance sheet showed total assets of $20,553,935,000, total
liabilities of $19,330,191,000.  The Debtors' exclusive period to
file a plan expires on Dec. 4, 2007.  (American Home Bankruptcy
News, Issue No. 14, Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc.,
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


AMERICAN HOME: Competes w/ Bear Stearns Over Rights to $1.8MM Fund
------------------------------------------------------------------
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is the securities administrator, paying
agent, and note or certificate registrar for a series of
mortgage-backed certificates held by Bear Stearns Mortgage
Capital Corp., Bear Stearns & Co. Inc., and Bear, Stearns
International Limited, which were issued in connection with
certain securitization transactions.

Todd C. Schiltz, Esq., at Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen,
LLP, in Wilmington, Delaware, relates that the Bear Entities
assert ownership of the Mortgage Certificates by exercising
remedies in August 2007 under certain repurchase agreements
between American Home Mortgage Investment Corp., and American
Home Mortgage Acceptance, Inc., and each of the Bear Entities.

Because of the remedies, the Bear Entities claim a right to the
principal and interest payments for August 2007, which were
payable on September 25.  However, the Bear Entities had not re-
registered the Mortgage Certificates in their own name, which is
necessary to make the Bear Entities the holders of record of the
Mortgage Certificates under the Transaction Agreements.  The
Mortgage Certificates were registered in the name of the Debtors,
which decline to instruct Wells Fargo to make the August Payment
to the Bear Entities.

Accordingly, Wells Fargo seeks to remit the August Payment, and
subsequent payments under the Mortgage Certificates, to the proper
party.  Mr. Schiltz contends that each of the Bear Entities and
the Debtors appear to have valid arguments supporting a claim to
the August Payment.  Wells Fargo is prepared to deposit with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware the August
Payment amounting to $1,863,786, until a determination can be made
as to the proper claimant.

Mr. Schiltz informs the Court that Wells Fargo has contacted the  
defendants on several occasions to attempt to resolve its
involvement with respect to the disbursement of the August
Payment, without success.  He says that the Bear Entities have
threatened to hold Wells Fargo strictly liable for failure to
make the August Payment to them.  Wells Fargo asked the Debtors  
to send an authorization to redirect the payment to the
applicable Bear Entity, but has not received from the Debtors any
letter of direction or authorization.

Wells Fargo also ask the Court to (i) enjoin each of the
defendants from instituting any actions against Wells Fargo
relating to the August Payment and subsequent payments related to
the Mortgage Certificates, (ii) relieve and discharge Wells Fargo
from any liability relating to any claim that might arise in
connection with the August Payment or subsequent payments, and
(iii) award Wells Fargo its reasonable costs, attorney's fees,
disbursements and allowances incurred in connection with the
action.

Based in Melville, New York, American Home Mortgage Investment
Corp. (NYSE: AHM) -- http://www.americanhm.com/-- is a mortgage
real estate investment trust engaged in the business of investing
in mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans resulting from
the securitization of residential mortgage loans originated and
serviced by its subsidiaries.

American Home Mortgage and seven affiliates filed for chapter 11
protection on Aug. 6, 2007 (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 07-11047
through 07-11054).  James L. Patton, Jr., Esq., Joel A. Waite,
Esq., and Pauline K. Morgan, Esq. at Young, Conaway, Stargatt &
Taylor LLP represent the Debtors.  Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC
acts as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.  The Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors has selected Hahn & Hessen LLP as
its counsel.  As of March 31, 2007, American Home Mortgage's
balance sheet showed total assets of $20,553,935,000, total
liabilities of $19,330,191,000.  The Debtors' exclusive period to
file a plan expires on Dec. 4, 2007.  (American Home Bankruptcy
News, Issue No. 14, Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc.,
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY: Moody's Holds Ba2 Rating on 2001B Bonds
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Services affirmed the Baa2 rating on the Bexar
County (TX) Housing Finance Corporation Multifamily Housing
Revenue Bonds (American Opportunity for Housing-Dublin, Kingswood,
and Waterford Apartments Project) Senior Series 2001A and the Ba2
rating on the Subordinate Series 2001B.  The outlook on the bonds
is stable.  The Junior Subordinate Series C bonds are not rated.  
The rating affirmation reflects the stability of the debt service
coverage of the project over time.

Dublin, Waterford, and Kingswood Manor apartments are three
separate multi-family rental properties located in San Antonio,
Texas with 156, 133, and 129 units respectively. The properties
are located approximately 8 to 12 miles north of downtown San
Antonio with good access to the city's principal traffic arteries.

LEGAL SECURITY: The bonds are secured by a lien on and pledge and
assignment of a security interest in the Trust Estate.

Interest Rate Derivative: none

Credit Strengths:

   * Debt service coverage remained solid for both the senior and
     subordinate bonds between 2003 and 2006.  Debt service
     coverage dipped to a low of 1.46 in 2005, but rebounded in
     2006, when it reached a solid 1.53x based on audited numbers.
     Coverage for the subordinate bonds ranged between 1.35 and
     1.30 between 2003 and 2005, and reached 1.36x in 2006.
     Unaudited financials as of September 30, 2007 indicate that
     the properties continue to remain solid financially.

   * Fully funded debt service reserve funds for both the Series A
     and B bonds.

   * Bonds are secured by the revenues from all three properties,
     instead of relying on revenues from one property to cover
     debt service on the bonds.  Moody's views this
     diversification of revenues as a credit strength.

Credit Challenges:

   * Occupancy continues to be weak and uneven at the properties,
     with 90.5% at the Dublin property, 90.4% at the Kingswood
     property and 85.1% at the Waterford property as of September
     2007.  However, rent increases put into effect in 2007 have
     helped revenues to remain steady over time.

   * Slight concern about the health of the San Antonio submarkets
     where the properties are located, which are projected to
     experience a rise in vacancies over the next several years
     (Torto Wheaton Research).

Outlook

The outlook for the bonds is stable.  The stable outlook reflects
Moody's belief that the project will continue to perform close to
current levels in terms of NOI. and debt service coverage.

What could change the rating- UP

   * Improvement in occupancy rates, leading to increased rental
     revenue and growth in NOI and debt service coverage.

What could change the rating- DOWN

   * Material deterioration in debt service coverage; tapping any
     of the debt service reserve funds.


BEXAR COUNTY: Performance Decline Prompts Moody's to Cut Ratings
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Services downgraded the rating on Bexar County
(TX) Housing Finance Corporation Housing Revenue Bonds (Nob Hill
Apartments Project) Senior Series 2001A to Ba3 from Ba2 and
downgraded the rating on the Subordinate Series 2001B to B1 from
Ba3.  The outlook remains negative. The Junior Subordinate Series
C bonds are not rated.  The rating downgrades reflect the
continued financial deterioration of the project.

Nob Hill Apartments Project is a 368-unit multi-family rental
property.

LEGAL SECURITY: The bonds are secured by a lien on and pledge and
assignment of a security interest in the Trust Estate.

Interest Rate Derivatives: none

Credit Strengths:

   * Fully funded debt service reserve funds for both the Series A
     and B bonds.

   * An improvement in occupancy during the latter half of 2007,
     from a low of 72% in May of 2007 to 85% as of October 2007.

   * Significant capital investment into the property, including
     building a new community center for the residents.

   * Property is managed by the Lynd Management Company, which has
     a strong background in managing affordable housing properties
     throughout Texas.

Credit Challenges:

   * Financial performance continues to decline.  As of 2006
     audited numbers, debt service coverage on the senior and
     subordinate bonds fell to 1.20x and 1.08x respectively.  As
     of unaudited financial statements in September 2007, the
     property was not producing enough revenue to cover operating
     expenses and debt service payments. However, debt service
     continues to be paid in a timely fashion due to financial
     support from the property owner.

   * Increased expenses also contributed to the decline in debt
     service coverage, with administrative expenses experiencing
     8% increase and Maintenance and Repair costs increasing 16%
     between 2005 and 2006 and continuing to increase in 2007.

Outlook

The outlook for the bonds remains negative.  The negative outlook
reflects the negative trend in debt service coverage over time.

What could change the rating- UP

   * Significant improvement in occupancy and debt service
     coverage.

What could change the rating- DOWN

   * Further deterioration in debt service coverage; tapping any
     of the debt service reserve funds.


BLAST ENERGY: Plan Confirmation Hearing Deferred to November 28
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Jeff Bohm of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas continued the hearing to consider
confirmation of Blast Energy Services Inc. and Eagle Domestic
Drilling Operations LLC's Joint Amended Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization to Nov. 28, 2007, at 9:00 a.m.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Oct. 22, 2007,
Judge Bohm approved the Amended Disclosure Statement explaining
the Debtors' Amended Plan citing that it contained "adequate
information" as required by Section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Judge Bohm also scheduled a Nov. 14, 2007, hearing to consider
confirmation of that Joint Amended Plan.

                       Treatment of Claims

Under the Plan, Administrative Claims will be paid in full and in
cash on the effective date.

Each holder of Priority Tax Claims, if any, will be paid in equal
annual installments of principal and interest.

Class 1 Allowed Priority Claims, totaling approximately $40,000,
are expected to recover 100% of their allowed claim amounts either
in cash or through a lesser treatment agreed to in writing.

Laurus Master Fund Ltd.'s secured claim will be fully satisfied by

    a) transfer of rigs pursuant to a settlement agreement and a
       related sale order and

    b) payment of $2,100,000  pursuant to a settlement agreement
       and a related sale order.

Berg McAfee Companies LLC's $1,120,000 estimated secured claim
will be fully satisfied by issuance to Berg McAfee of a new three
year note in the amount of $1,120,000 with an annual interest rate
of 8%, with interest payable at the end of the term in Reorganized
Blast Common Stock, and with a principal conversion right
exercisable at Berg McAfee's election.

Other secured claims, will, at the Debtors' option, either:

   a) be paid in cash in full;

   b) receive, without representation or warranty, the collateral
      securing its claim; or

   c) receive a note, secured by a lien securing its allowed
      secured claim.

Holders of Convenience Claims against both Debtors will receive,
in full and final satisfaction of their claim, cash on the
distribution date equal to 75% of the allowed claim amounts.

Unsecured Claims against both Debtors are entitled to cash
payments equal to:

   (a) 35% of the allowed claim amount; and

   (b) 65% of the allowed unsecured claim in the form of a junior
       secured note.

Second Bridge LLC's 900,000 shares of Blast common stock will, on
the effective date, be purchased by Reorganized Blast for $900.

Each holder of Allowed Unsecured Directors' Claim will be
converted to Blast common stock at the rate of $ 0.20 per share.   
This class of claims in the Plan was created at the request of the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and informally has been
consented to by each member of the Debtors' Board of Directors.

All interests in the Debtors will be retained by the holders in
the current form.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available for a
fee at:

   http://www.researcharchives.com/bin/download?id=071017232413

                   Texas Comptroller Objections

In a court filing dated Oct. 26, 2007, the Texas Comptroller of
Public Accountants, who holds a priority tax claims for franchise
taxes against the Debtors, filed with the Court an objection
alleging that the Debtors' Joint Amended Plan failed to disclose a
rate of interest due to holders of priority tax claims.

The Texas comptroller contends that the Debtors' Joint Amended
Plan should specify an interest rate of 9.25%.

The Texas comptroller further states that the Debtors' Joint
Amended Plan contains inadequate remedies in the event of a plan
default.

                   About Blast Energy Services

Headquartered in Houston, Blast Energy Services and its debtor-
affiliate Eagle Domestic Drilling Operations LLC --
http://www.blastenergyservices.com/-- owns and contracts land   
drilling rigs to third parties.  The Debtor also provides services
relating to drilling rig operations.

Blast Energy owns and develops abrasive jetting intellectual
property, technology and equipment providing downhole production
enhancement and drilling solutions, and satellite broadband access
for Internet, data, email, applications, VoIP and video streaming
as energy industry management tools providing real-time
supervisory control and data acquisition.

The company filed for Chapter 11 protection on Jan. 19, 2007
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 07-30424 and 07-30426).  H. Rey
Stroube, III, Esq., represent the Debtors.  The Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors is represented by Alan D. Halperin, Esq.,
at Halperin Battaglia Raicht LLP.  When the Debtor filed for
protection from its creditors, it listed total assets of
$63,500,851 and total debts of $51,019,486.


BOMBAY CO: Taps DJM Realty to Dispose U.S. Retail Store Leases
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Bombay Company, Inc., has selected DJM Realty, a provider of
strategic real estate solutions, to exclusively manage the
national disposition of all 335 retail store leases and five
distribution center leases in the United States.  Bombay
specializes in unique home accessories, wall decor and furniture
through 384 retail outlets in the U.S. and Canada.

"There are very few opportunities to offer a real estate portfolio
as unique as Bombay's, which consists of locations in elite malls,
street front properties and strong strip, outlet and lifestyle
centers," Andy Graiser, Co-President of DJM Realty, said.  "Bombay
stores are concentrated in the Northeast with 73 locations, the
Southeast with 98 locations, the Midwest with 50 locations and
California with 53 locations.  We are excited to offer these prime
real estate properties ranging from 1,800 to 11,000 square feet."

Bombay is liquidating its inventory through the stores during the
holiday season.  The engagement of DJM Realty, which is subject to
bankruptcy court approval expected next week, anticipates an
auction on these properties in mid-December 2007.

The 335 stores operate in the following 41 states: Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware,
Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota,
Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, Nebraska, Nevada,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and West Virginia. Bombay's
distribution centers are located in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Texas,
Indiana, and California, and range in size from 250 thousand to
400 thousand square feet.

"Given the desirability of these properties and the amount of
interest that we have already received, interested parties must
act immediately," Mr. Graiser said.

For more information regarding the disposition of these leases for
Bombay, please contact James Avallone at (631) 752-1100 ext. 224.

Headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas, The Bombay Company Inc.,
(OTC Bulletin Board: BBAO) -- http://www.bombaycompany.com/  
-- designs, sources and markets a unique line of home
accessories, wall decor and furniture through 384 retail outlets
and the Internet in the U.S. and internationally, including Cayman
Islands.  The company and five of its debtor-affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection on Sept. 20, 2007 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead
Case No. 07-44084).  Robert D. Albergotti, Esq., John D. Penn,
Esq., Ian T. Peck, Esq., and Jason B. Binford, Esq., at Haynes and
Boone, L.L.P., represent the Debtors.  As of May 5, 2007, the
Debtors listed total assets of $239,400,000 and total debts of
$173,400,000.

Attorneys at Cooley, Godward, Kronish LLP acts as counsel for
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  Forshey &
Prostok LLP is the Committee's local counsel.


BRITISH AMERICAN HOMES: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------------------
Alleged Debtor: British American Homes, L.L.C.
                7380 Sand Lake Road, Suite 100
                Orlando, FL 32819
                Tel: (305) 854-6000

Case Number: 07-05628

Type of Business: The Debtor develops commercial and residential
                  properties.  See
                  http://britishamericanhomesusa.com/

Involuntary Petition Date: November 8, 2007

Court: Middle District of Florida (Orlando)

Judge: Karen S. Jennemann

Petitioner's Counsel: Asher Rabinowitz, Esq.
                      Anderson & Badgley, P.L.
                      1270 Orange Avenue, Suite D
                      Winter Park, FL 32789
                      Tel: (407) 478-4600
                      Fax: (407) 478-4777
         
   Petitioners                 Nature of Claim      Claim Amount
   -----------                 ---------------      ------------
Giovanni & Jospehine           joint judgment       $89,688
Tramontana
3566 Gregg Court
Wantaugh, NY 11793

Omotayo Awontunde              joint judgment       $89,173
11744 Pindall Chase Drive
Fulton, MD 20759

William & Kathleen A.          joint judgment       $89,009
Laboon
5626 6th Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15236


C2K2 MOTORS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
----------------------------------------------
Debtor: C.2.K.2. Motors, Inc.
        212 Hogan Boulevard
        Mill Hall, PA 17751

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-52925

Type of Business: The Debtor sells new and used automobiles in
                  retail.  It also leases passenger cars and
                  trucks.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 9, 2007

Court: Middle District of Pennsylvania (Wilkes-Barre)

Judge: John J. Thomas

Debtor's Counsel: Faith M. Lucchesi, Esq.
                  De Boef Lucchesi & Associates, P.C.
                  1368 South Atherton Street
                  State College, PA 16801
                  Tel: (814) 231-4050
                  Fax: (814) 231-4051

Estimated Assets: $1 Million to $100 Million

Estimated Debts:  $1 Million to $100 Million

The Debtor did not file a list of its 20 largest unsecured
creditors.


CAITHNESS COSO: Extends Pricing Date of Notes & Bonds Offering
--------------------------------------------------------------
Caithness Coso Funding Corp. has extended the date on which the
pricing for the Notes will be established from 2:00 p.m. New York
City time on Nov. 13, 2007 to 2:00 p.m. New York City time on
Nov. 30, 2007, in connection with its tender offers and consent
solicitations for its $90 million original principal amount of
6.263% Subordinated Secured Notes due 2014 (CUSIP Nos. 128017AK6
and U12295AD0) and its $375 million original principal amount of
5.489% Senior Secured Bonds due 2019 (CUSIP Nos. 128017AG5 and
U12295AC2.

The company has also extended the date the tender offer is
scheduled to expire from 9:00 a.m. New York City time on
Nov. 27, 2007 to 9:00 a.m. New York City time on Dec. 7, 2007.
Each of the Price Determination Date and the Expiration Time may
be further extended by the company.

The tender offers are subject to the satisfaction of certain
conditions, including the receipt of specified financing, the
consummation of the Acquisitions and certain other customary
conditions.
    
On Oct. 11, 2007, the company has received, pursuant to its tender
offers and consent solicitations for any and all of its
outstanding Notes, the requisite consents to adopt the proposed
amendments and the proposed waivers to the Notes and the
indentures governing the Notes.  

The tender offers and related consent solicitations were conducted
in connection with the agreement between Caithness Energy L.L.C.,
certain owners of Caithness Energy, certain subsidiaries of
Caithness Energy and ArcLight Renewco Holdings LLC, dated July 9,
2007, pursuant to which Renewco has agreed to acquire a 100%
direct ownership interest in certain affiliates of the company.

The company may, in its sole discretion, accept for payment and
pay for Notes tendered on an initial settlement date prior to the
Expiration Time.
    
The company disclosed that as of 5:00 p.m., New York City time,
on Nov. 12, 2007: the principal amount of Notes had been
validly tendered and not withdrawn:

   -- $90,000,000 million original principal amount of the 2014
      Notes, representing 100% of the outstanding original
      principal amount of such Notes; and

   -- $355,000,000 million original principal amount of the
      2019 Bonds, representing 94.67% of the outstanding
      original principal amount of such Bonds.

The company and the trustee have executed supplemental indentures
giving effect to the proposed amendments and the
proposed waivers.  Such supplemental indentures and waivers will
only become operative, however, concurrently with the
acquisitions, provided that all validly tendered Notes are
accepted for purchase pursuant to the tender offers.
    
The company has retained Citi to act as sole dealer manager for
the tender offers and as the solicitation agent for the consent
solicitations.  Citi can be contacted at (212) 723-6106 (collect)
or at (800) 558-3745 (toll free).  

Global Bondholder Services Corporation is the Information
Agent and Depositary for the tender offers and can be contacted at
(212) 430-3774 (collect) or at (866) 470-4200 (toll free). Copies
of the Offer Documents and other related documents may be obtained
from the Information Agent.
    
             About Caithness Coso Funding Corp.

Based in New York City, Caithness Coso Funding Corp. is a single-
purpose Delaware corporation formed to finance the business and
operations of Navy I Partnership, BLM Partnership, and Navy II
Partnership.  The company has no material assets, other than the
loans it has made and will make to the Partnerships and certain
accounts created in connection with the offering of the notes, and
does not conduct any business, other than issuing the notes and
making the loans to the partnerships, and activities directly
related thereto.

                          *     *     *

Moody's Investor Services assigned a Ba1 rating on Caithness Coso
Funding Corp.'s subordinate debt.  The outlook is stable.  The
rating was placed in January 2007 and still holds to date.   

Fitch placed the company's subordinate debt at BB+ in January
2007.


CALPINE CORP: Creditor & Equity Panel Backs Claims Objection Plea
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and the Official
Committee of Equity Security Holders inform the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York that they support
Calpine Corp. and its debtor-affiliates' objection to Claim No.
5166 filed by Hawaii Structural Ironworkers Pension Trust Fund.

                Hawaii Structural's Lawsuit

Calpine had said in March 2003 that it was restating its net
income for 2000, 2001 and a portion of 2002 by an immaterial
amount, ranging from approximately 1.5% to 3% of income, to
reflect a different accounting treatment of sale/leaseback
transactions for two power plants as recommended by its auditors.

After that announcement, Hawaii Fund, on behalf of itself and a
putative class of shareholders, commenced a class action complaint
in the Superior Court of the state of California, County of San
Diego against Calpine, certain directors and officer defendants
and certain underwrites of Calpine Corp.'s stock offering in 2002.

The Hawaii Fund asserted that the statements that Calpine Corp.
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2002
were materially false and misleading because they concealed the
fact that the company's financial results and projections were
overstated and concealed adverse trends that the company was then
experiencing.

In the California Lawsuit, the Hawaii Fund alleged that:

  * a registration statement and prospectus for Calpine's April
    2002 follow-on offering of shares contained false or
    misleading material statements;

  * a forecast for 2002 earnings included in the April 2002
    offering documents turned out to be incorrect at the end of
    2002, eight months later;

  * Calpine's former chief executive officer, Peter Cartwright,
    one of the Individual Defendants, intended to sell shares
    within 90 days of the 2002 Offering but failed to disclose
    the intent in the offering documents; and

  * Calpine failed to disclose 31 purported "wash" trades
    between 2000 and 2001.

                        $60-Million Claim

In August 2006, the Hawaii Fund filed, on behalf of itself and
the Class, Claim No. 5166 asserting "at least $60,000,000" in
damages against Calpine Corporation.  In June 2007, the Hawaii
Fund asked the Bankruptcy Court to certify its class for purposes
of the Class Claim.  The request is still pending with the
Bankruptcy Court.

In August 2007, the Debtors, the Individual Defendants, the
Underwriters and the Hawaii Fund participated in a mediation
designed to facilitate a consensual resolution of Claim No. 5166.  
The mediation was not successful.

                Adjustments were Immaterial

Mark E. McKane, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, in New York,
asserted that slight adjustments associated with the 2003
Restatement were immaterial.  He adds that the decline in
Calpine's share price between April 2002 and March 2003 happened
before the restatement was confirmed and is attributable to
factors other than the restatement, none of which can subject the
Debtors to any liability.

The Hawaii Fund further sought to use 20/20 hindsight to recover
damages on the basis that the Debtors failed to meet good faith
projections.  Mr. McKane said that it is blackletter law that,
absent fraud, a company is not liable for failing to meet good
faith projections.  The burden then, he said, is on Hawaii Fund
to prove that the forecast was made with actual knowledge of its
falsity.

With regards to Mr. Cartwright's stock sales, Mr. McKane noted
that the offering documents explicitly stated that any sale would
occur only after Mr. Cartwright obtained certain consents.  Mr.
Cartwright indisputably secured those consents and advised the
market months before the offering of his intent to sell shares,
Mr. McKane further said.

Moreover, Mr. McKane asserts that Calpine need not disclose the
purported "wash" trades because they were not "wash" trades.  
Even if the trades had been "wash" trades, they represented, in
the aggregate, approximately 0.001% of Calpine's revenues and had
no impact whatsoever on the company's gross profits, Mr. McKane
added.

Thus the Debtors requested the Court to expunge Claim No. 5166.

               Hawaii Fund's Request for Abstention

Hawaii Fund asked the Bankruptcy Court to abstain from hearing the
Debtors' objection to its Claim No. 5166, on the basis that:

  (a) abstention will not negatively impact the administration
      of the estate;

  (b) the consideration and application of non-bankruptcy laws
      predominate over any bankruptcy issues that may exist with
      respect to the claim objection;

  (c) the Hawaii Litigation was commenced in the California
      State Court in 2003, and therefore has jurisdiction over
      the claims asserted in the Hawaii Litigation;

  (d) the Debtors' filing of their objection in the Bankruptcy
      Court is an attempt at forum shopping to avoid a
      determination by the California State Court that has
      already granted relief in favor of Hawaii Structural; and

  (e) the Hawaii Litigation contains a jury demand and involves
      non-Debtor parties.

Hawaii Fund wants the California State Court to determine
the Debtors' objection where the Hawaii Litigation has been
pending for almost three years before the bankruptcy filing and
over four years in total.

           Debtors Want Abstention Plea Denied

The Bankruptcy Court has acknowledged that permissive abstention
is "appropriate only in certain narrowly tailored exceptional
circumstances" because federal courts have a virtually unflagging
obligation to exercise the jurisdiction given to them, Richard M.
Cieri, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, in New York, notes.  
Hawaii Structural has filed its claim in the Bankruptcy Court,
thus this Court is the appropriate forum to determine the
Debtors' liability, Mr. Cieri asserted.

Mr. Cieri further asserted that permissive abstention is
inappropriate in complex reorganization cases like the Debtors'.  
The Debtors have set Jan. 31, 2008, as target deadline for
emergence.  The Hawaii Claim is one of the largest disputed
litigation claims pending against the Debtors and therefore will
have to be estimated or resolved before emergence to avoid
disproportionately large reserves of stock held back on account
of the Claim, Mr. Cieri pointed out.

Thus, the Debtors ask the Court to deny Hawaii Structural's
request for abstention.

                  About Calpine Corporation

Based in San Jose, California, Calpine Corporation (OTC Pink
Sheets: CPNLQ) -- http://www.calpine.com/-- supplies customers
and communities with electricity from clean, efficient, natural
gas-fired and geothermal power plants.  Calpine owns, leases and
operates integrated systems of plants in 21 U.S. states and in
three Canadian provinces.  Its customized products and services
include wholesale and retail electricity, gas turbine components
and services, energy management and a wide range of power plant
engineering, construction and maintenance and operational
services.

The company and its affiliates filed for chapter 11 protection on
Dec. 20, 2005 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 05-60200).  Richard
M. Cieri, Esq., Matthew A. Cantor, Esq., Edward Sassower, Esq.,
and Robert G. Burns, Esq., Kirkland & Ellis LLP represent the
Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Michael S. Stamer, Esq.,
at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, represents the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  As of Aug. 31, 2007, the
Debtors disclosed total assets of $18,467,000,000, total
liabilities not subject to compromise of $11,207,000,000, total
liabilities subject to compromise of $15,354,000,000 and
stockholders' deficit of $8,102,000,000.

On Feb. 3, 2006, two more affiliates, Geysers Power Company, LLC,
and Silverado Geothermal Resources, Inc., filed voluntary chapter
11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 06-10197 and 06-10198).  
On Sept. 20, 2007, Santa Rosa Energy Center, LLC, another
affiliate, also filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 07-12967).

On June 20, 2007, the Debtors filed their Chapter 11 Plan and
Disclosure Statement.  On Aug. 27, 2007, the Debtors filed their
Amended Plan and Disclosure Statement.  Calpine filed a Second
Amended Plan on Sept. 19, 2007 and on Sept. 24, 2007, filed a
Third Amended Plan.  On Sept. 25, 2007, the Court approved the
adequacy of the Debtors' Disclosure Statement and entered a
written order on September 26.  The hearing to consider
confirmation of the Plan is scheduled on Dec 18, 2007.  (Calpine
Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 67; Bankruptcy Creditors' Service Inc.;
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


CAMBER 7: Moody's Junks Rating on $11.25 Mil. Floating Rate Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed these notes issued by Camber 7
plc on review for possible downgrade:

Class Description: $485,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Secured
Notes Due 2042

   -- Prior Rating: Aaa
   -- Current Rating: Aaa, on review for possible downgrade

In addition Moody's also downgraded and left on review for
possible downgrade these notes:

Class Description: $100,000,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Secured
Notes Due 2042

   -- Prior Rating: Aaa
   -- Current Rating: Aa3, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $72,000,000 Class A-3 Floating Rate Secured
Notes Due 2042

   -- Prior Rating: Aaa
   -- Current Rating: A1, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $81,000,000 Class B Floating Rate Secured Notes
Due 2042

   -- Prior Rating: Aa2
   -- Current Rating: A3, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $78,300,000 Class C Deferrable Floating Rate
Secured Notes Due 2042

   -- Prior Rating: A2
   -- Current Rating: Baa3, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $45,450,000 Class D Deferrable Floating Rate
Secured Notes Due 2042

   -- Prior Rating: Baa2
   -- Current Rating: B1, on review for possible downgrade

Finally, Moody's also downgraded these notes:

Class Description: $11,250,000 Class E Deferrable Floating Rate
Secured Notes Due 2042

   -- Prior Rating: Ba1
   -- Current Rating: Ca

According to Moody's, the rating actions are the result of
deterioration in the credit quality of the transaction's
underlying collateral pool, which consists primarily of structured
finance securities.


CANARGO ENERGY: Posts $9.96 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Canargo Energy Corp reported a net loss of $9.96 million on oil
and gas sales of $32,961 for the third quarter ended Sept. 30,
2007, compared with a net loss of $5.72 million on oil and gas
sales of $2.09 million in the same period in 2006.

The loss from continuing operations of $9.90 million for the
three-month period ended Sept. 30, 2007, compares to a net loss
from continuing operations of $4.23 million for the three month
period ended Sept. 30, 2006.

The decrease in operating revenue is attributable to lower sales
volumes achieved from the Ninotsminda Field in the third quarter
of 2007.  Ninotsminda Oil Company Limited sold no barrels of oil
for the three month period ended Sept. 30, 2007, compared to
38,968 barrels of oil for the three month period ended Sept. 30,
2006.

For the three month period ended Sept. 30, 2007, NOC's net share
of the 38,510 barrels of gross oil production for sale from the
Ninotsminda Field in the period amounted to 25,032 barrels.  In
the period, no oil was sold from storage.  For the three-month
period ended Sept. 30, 2006, NOC's net share of the 40,798 barrels
of gross oil production was 26,519 barrels.

The operating loss from continuing operations for the three-month
period ended Sept. 30, 2007 amounted to $2.20 million compared
with an operating loss of $2.18 million for the three-month period
ended Sept. 30, 2006.

                     Discontinued Operations

On Aug. 1, 2007, the company disclosed that it sold its entire
shareholding of 8 million shares in Tethys for gross proceeds
before commissions, expenses and payment of a pro rata share of
the Tethys IPO costs to Tethys Petroleum Limited of
CDN$23.6 million.  The net proceeds were used to repay outstanding
indebtedness.

The net loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes and
minority interest for the three month period ended Sept. 30, 2007,
of $56,000 decreased from $2.02 million for the three month period
ended Sept. 30, 2006, due to the activities of Tethys and CanArgo
Samgori Limited.

                    Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $7.61 million from
$14.69 million at Dec. 31, 2006, to $7.08 million at Sept. 30,
2007.  The decrease was due to expenditures in the period to
primarily fund the cost of development activities at the
Ninotsminda Field, appraisal activities at the Manavi oil
discovery and Kumisi gas discovery in Georgia and net cash used by
operating activities.

Restricted cash decreased from $300,000 at Dec. 31, 2006, to $0 at
Sept. 30, 2007, due to the maturing of a deposit funding a letter
of credit as required under a drilling service contract the
company entered into with Baker Hughes International.

                          Balance Sheet

At Sept. 30, 2007, the company's consolidated balance sheet showed
$102.17 million in total assets, $19.47 million in total
liabilities, $2.12 million in temporary equity, and $80.58 million
in total shareholders' equity.

Full-text copies of the company's consolidated financial
statements for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2007, are available for
free at http://researcharchives.com/t/s?2541

                       Going Concern Doubt

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on March 26, 2007, LJ
Soldinger Associates LLC expressed substantial doubt about Canargo
Energy Corp.'s ability to continue as a going concern after
auditing the company's consolidated financial statements for the
years ended Dec. 31, 2006, and 2005.   The auditing firm reported
that the company has incurred net losses since inception and may
not have sufficient funds to execute its business plan.

                       About CanArgo Energy

CanArgo Energy Corp. (AMEX: CNR) -- http://www.canargo.com/   --    
is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company
with its oil and gas operations currently located in Georgia.


CASH TECH: Arranges $750,000 of New Funding for its Cash Needs
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Technologies Inc. arranged transactions that will provide the
company with proceeds totaling $750,000.

The company recently issued a 6% convertible debenture for
$250,000 due June 30, 2010, to Crescent International Ltd.  The
conversion price of the debenture is $0.75 per share.  The funds
have been received and the transaction has closed.
    
Cash Tech has also agreed to sell 7,000 shares of Health Payment
Systems Inc. fka CDHC Inc. that it owns to two private investors
for $500,000.  Closing of this sale is scheduled on or before
today, Nov. 13, 2007.  

Cash Tech acquired 15,000 shares of the stock in exchange for
$1,000,000 in face value of Cash Technologies preferred stock
in 2005.  The sale of 7,000 of these shares therefore represents a
small profit to Cash Tech.  The company will continue to hold the
remaining 8,000 shares.
    
Furthermore, the company has engaged New York investment banking
firm HPC Capital Management Corp. to raise additional working
capital.  The company has authorized HPC to raise up to $2,000,000
in the form of equity or convertible debt or a combination
thereof.
    
"These recent transactions are intended to bridge the company's
cash needs until a larger financing can be arranged. Based on our
current and projected revenues, the $2,000,000 financing would
provide us with sufficient capital until the company is positive
cash flow," Bruce Korman, CEO of Cash Technologies, stated.
   
                    About Cash Technologies

Headquartered in Los Angeles, Cash Technologies Inc. (AMEX: TQ)
-- http://www.cashtechnologies.com/-- develops and markets     
innovative data processing solutions in the healthcare and
financial services industries.

Cash Technologies Inc.'s consolidated balance sheet at Aug. 31,
2007, showed $6.5 million in total assets, $10.6 million in total
liabilities, and $105,188 in minority interest, resulting in a
$4 million total stockholders' deficit.

                     Going Concern Doubt

Vasquez & Company LLP expressed substantial doubt about Cash
Technologies Inc.'s ability to continue as a going concern after
auditing the company's consolidated financial statements for the
year ended May 31, 2007.  The auditing firm noted that the company
has suffered significant recurring losses and is in immediate need
of substantial working capital to continue its business and
operations.


CD 2007-CD5: S&P Puts Low-B Ratings on Six Certificate Classes
--------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its preliminary
ratings to CD 2007-CD5 Commercial Mortgage Trust's $2.09 billion
commercial mortgage pass-through certificates series CD 2007-CD5.
     
The preliminary ratings are based on information as of Nov. 9,
2007.  Subsequent information may result in the assignment of
final ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.
     
The preliminary ratings reflect the credit support provided by the
subordinate classes of certificates, the liquidity provided by the
trustee, the economics of the underlying loans, and the geographic
and property type diversity of the loans.  Class A-1, A-2, A-3, A-
AB, A-4, A-1A, AM-FX, A-MA, AJ-FX, A-JA, B, and C are currently
being offered publicly, and the remaining classes will be offered
privately.  Standard & Poor's analysis determined that, on a
weighted average basis, the pool has a debt service coverage of
1.21x, a beginning LTV of 109.6%, and an ending LTV of 103.5%.
    
    
                  Preliminary Ratings Assigned
             CD 2007-CD5 Commercial Mortgage Trust
   
                                            Recommended
     Class        Rating        Amount     credit support
     -----        ------        ------     --------------
     A-1          AAA        $42,300,000      30.000%
     A-2          AAA        $89,000,000      30.000%
     A-3          AAA        $39,400,000      30.000%
     A-AB         AAA        $51,700,000      30.000%
     A-4          AAA       $958,680,000      30.000%
     A-1A         AAA       $284,848,000      30.000%
     AM-FX        AAA       $167,726,000      20.000%
     A-MA         AAA        $40,693,000      20.000%
     AJ-FX        AAA       $110,780,000      13.375%
     A-JA         AAA        $26,959,000      13.375%
     B            AA+        $20,942,000      12.375%
     C            AA         $20,942,000      11.375%
     XP*          AAA                TBD         N/A
     XS*          AAA     $1,047,091,908         N/A
     XW*          AAA     $1,047,091,908         N/A
     AM-FL**      AAA         $1,000,000      20.000%
     AJ-FL**      AAA         $1,000,000      13.375%
     D            AA-        $20,942,000      10.375%
     E            A+         $18,324,000       9.500%
     F            A          $18,324,000       8.625%
     G            A-         $20,942,000       7.625%
     H            BBB+       $23,559,000       6.500%
     J            BBB        $23,560,000       5.375%
     K            BBB-       $20,942,000       4.375%
     L            BB+        $26,177,000       3.125%
     M            BB          $7,853,000       2.750%
     N            BB-         $5,236,000       2.500%
     O            B+          $5,235,000       2.250%
     P            B           $5,236,000       2.000%
     Q            B-          $2,617,000       1.875%
     S            NR         $39,266,816          NR
  

          * Interest-only class with a notional amount.
                      ** Floating-rate class.
                      TBD -- To be determined.
                       N/A -- Not applicable.
                         NR -- Not rated.


CETUS ABS: Moody's Downgrades Ratings on Four Note Classes
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded four classes of notes issued
by Cetus ABS CDO 2006-4, Ltd., with two of these classes left on
review for further possible downgrade.  The notes affected by the
rating action are:

Class Description: $150,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Senior
Secured Notes Due 2047

   -- Prior Rating: Aaa, on review for possible downgrade
   -- Current Rating: Ba3, on review for possible downgrade

Class Description: $75,000,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Senior
Secured Notes Due 2047

   -- Prior Rating: Aa2, on review for possible downgrade
   -- Current Rating: Caa3, on review for possible downgrade

In addition Moody's also downgraded these notes:

Class Description: $82,500,000 Class B Floating Rate Deferrable
Subordinate Secured Notes Due 2047

   -- Prior Rating: Ba3, on review for possible downgrade
   -- Current Rating: Ca

Class Description: $60,000,000 Class C Floating Rate Deferrable
Junior Subordinate Secured Notes Due 2047

   -- Prior Rating: B1, on review for possible downgrade
   -- Current Rating: Ca

The rating actions reflect severe deterioration in the credit
quality of the underlying portfolio, as well as the occurrence on
Nov. 6, 2007 of an event of default caused by a failure of the Net
Outstanding Portfolio Collateral Balance plus the MVS Account
Excess to exceed the required level pursuant to Section 5.1(h) of
the Indenture.

Cetus ABS CDO 2006-4, Ltd. is a synthetic resecuritization with
the reference pool consisting of RMBS securities, CMBS securities,
CDO securities and ABS securities.

Recent ratings downgrades on the underlying portfolio magnified
the impact of the ratings-based haircuts, causing the Net
Outstanding Portfolio Collateral Balance plus the MVS Account
Excess to be less than the required level.

Upon an event of default in this transaction, one of the remedies
available to noteholders is the sale and liquidation of the
collateral securing the notes. It is not clear at this time
whether this remedy will be selected.

The rating downgrades taken today reflect the increased expected
loss associated with each tranche.  Losses are attributed to
diminished credit quality on the underlying portfolio.  The
expected losses of certain tranches may be different, however,
depending on the timing and choice of remedy to be pursued.
Because of this uncertainty, the Class A-1 and Class A-2 Notes
remain on review for possible downgrade pending the receipt of
definitive information.


CHARLES BOOTHE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Charles Edward Boothe
        Sandra Lyn Boothe
        8205 East Adobe Drive
        Scottsdale, AZ 85255

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-05929

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 8, 2007

Court: District of Arizona (Phoenix)

Judge: Redfield T. Baum Sr.

Debtors' Counsel: Allan D. Newdelman, Esq.
                  80 East Columbus Avenue
                  Phoenix, AZ 85012
                  Tel: (602) 264-4550
                  Fax: (602) 277-0144

Estimated Assets: $1 Million to $100 Million

Estimated Debts:  $1 Million to $100 Million

The Debtors did not file a list of their 20 largest unsecured
creditors.


CHARYS HOLDING:  Miller Ray Houser Raises Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------------
Miller Ray Houser & Stewart LLP expressed substantial doubt about
Charys Holding Company, Inc., fka Spiderboy International, Inc.'s
ability to continue as a going concern after auditing the
company's financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2007.  
The auditing firm pointed to the company's recurring losses from
operations and net capital deficiency.

The company has incurred losses from operations of $35,682,453 and
$1,129,885 for the years ended April 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.  Consolidated revenues increased by $28,703,712 or
59.1% to $77,274,624 in fiscal 2007, as compared to the same
period in the prior year.  The acquisition of Complete Tower
Sources Inc, Mitchell Site Acq, Inc., Crochet & Borel, the Cotton
Companies, LFC, Inc., and Digital Communications Services, Inc.
during this period increased Charys consolidated revenues by
$28,486,682.

The company posted a net loss of $309,125,469 on $77,274,624 of
net revenues for the year ended April 30, 2007, as compared with a
net loss of $1,429,165 on $48,570,912 of net revenues in the prior
year.

At April 30, 2007, the company's liquid working capital was a
deficiency of $134,531,753 as compared to a deficiency of
$31,137,683 at April 30, 2006.  The increased working capital
deficiency of $103,394,070 is a direct result of the increase in
debt related to acquisitions.  At April 30, 2007, total debt was
$208,445,370, as compared to $26,099,733 in the prior year.

As of April 30, 2007, the company has total current assets of
$77,789,237 and total current liabilities of $203,856,454,
resulting in a $126.1 million working capital deficit with a
limited borrowing capacity.

At April 30, 2007, the company's balance sheet showed $290,820,546
in total assets, $276,375,237 in total liabilities and $14,445,309
stockholders' equity.  

A full-text copy of the company's 2007 annual report is available
for free at http://ResearchArchives.com/t/s?2509

                        About Charys Holding

Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Charys Holding Company, Inc. --
http://www.charys.com/-- is pursuing a growth opportunity in the  
Technology Infrastructure Support and Services market through an
acquisitions strategy, focusing on companies that have strong
individual reputation, proven and underleveraged growth
capability, and significant management commitment tied to Charys-
wide synergies.  Chary's seeks to acquire stable, cash flow
positive, small to medium-sized private companies engaged in
providing direct services, outsourced services and infrastructure
to medium and large enterprise businesses.  Charys intends to
operate these companies as independent subsidiaries, improving
aggregate financial performance by influencing its subsidiaries to
develop and leverage beneficial synergistic relationships.


COMPUTER WORLDS: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
----------------------------------------------------
Alleged Debtor: Computer Worlds Solutions, Inc.
                1550 Abbott Drive
                Wheeling, IL 60090

Case Number: 07-21123

Type of Business: The Debtor sells imported TV, video & computer
                  monitors and components & consumer electronics.

Involuntary Petition Date: November 9, 2007

Court: Northern District of Illinois (Chicago)

Judge: Jacqueline P. Cox

Petitioner's Counsel: James Dasso, Esq.
                      Joanne Lee, Esq.
                      Foley & Lardner, L.L.P.
                      321 North Clark Street, Suite 2800
                      Chicago, IL 60610
                      Tel: (312) 832-4557 or (312) 832-4500
         
   Petitioners                 Nature of Claim      Claim Amount
   -----------                 ---------------      ------------
Wells Fargo Bank               freight              $39,033
Development Specialists, Inc.
70 West Madison, Suite 2300
Chicago, IL 60602

Fifth Third Bank               loan                 $10,000
1023 West 55th Street
Countryside, IL 60525

Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.   credit advance       $6,618
Development Specialists, Inc.
70 West Madison, Suite 2300
Chicago, IL 60602


CONNACHER OIL: Moody's Rates $600 Million Pending Notes Offering
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Connacher Oil & Gas Limited's
B1 Corporate Family Rating, assigned a SGL-3 speculative grade
liquidity rating and, under its Loss Given Default methodology,
assigned a B1 (LGD4; 55%) rating to its pending $600 million
offering of 8-year senior second lien notes and a B1 probability
of default rating.  Moody's does not rate Connacher's new 5-year
CDN$200 million first secured bank revolver, undrawn at closing.  

The Corporate Family Rating has been moved from Connacher Finance
Corp. to parent Connacher Oil & Gas Limited.  Moody's also
withdraws CFC's B1 ratings on a $180 million senior secured Term
Loan B and $15 million first secured bank revolver (each retired
with note proceeds).  The rating outlook is stable.

Generally, Connacher's ratings reflect high leverage and uncertain
bitumen production rates and costs, balanced with potentially very
large commercial resources; completion of its Pod One oil sands
development roughly on time and within 20% of budget; Connacher's
expectation that Pod One initial production will begin by year-end
2007; effectively full front-end funding for its Algar development
(formerly Pod Two); and significant existing cash flow in the
range of CAD90 million per year from conventional oil and gas
operations.

The stable outlook could be impacted if (i) tight regional labor
and supplier markets or other factors unduly harm project timing
or costs, (ii) actual Pod One production, decline curves per well
pair, energy costs, or the key steam/oil ratio unduly impact
sustainable production, costs, or capital intensity per unit of
production, (iii) realized prices do not sufficiently support
inherently high operating costs and deep price discounts relative
to light sweet oil prices, or (iv) Algar financing and development
costs overly burden debt service capacity.  It will be late 2008
before Connacher can produce cash flow commensurate with its
capital investment.

Excepting Connacher's 26% equity interest in Petrolifera Petroleum
Limited, a public Canadian firm with South American exploration
and production interests, the notes are second secured by
Connacher's and its subsidiaries' developed and undeveloped oil
sands properties, conventional oil and gas properties, refining
assets, and related contracts and regulatory permits. The new bank
revolver is first secured by those assets. Connacher's economic
substance resides in Pod One, the Montana refinery, the small
conventional exploration and production business, the Algar
project, and still fairly unevaluated oil sands acreage in Pods
Three, Four, Five, and Six in the Great Divide and Halfway Creek
regions.

Connacher is a small conventional exploration, production, and
refining firm that is pursuing the phased development of an oil
sands project in Alberta, Canada.  In early 2006, Connacher also
acquired a small 8,400 barrel per day (bpd) oil refinery and
related product inventory in northern Montana from Holly
Corporation for CAD66 million.  Connacher completed its initial
(Pod One) development of its Great Divide oil sands steam assisted
gravity drainage (SAGD) project in August, 2007, commenced
steaming from 15 horizontal well pairs in September, and is now
developing a second phase named Algar.  First Pod One production
is expected later this year after conversion of the lower of each
well pair from steam injection to production with production ramp-
up to Connacher's expected mid-2008 10,000 bpd target.

More specifically, the ratings are restrained by high leverage;
project development, cost, completion, and timing risks; extreme
regional development cost pressures; volatile oil prices;
potentially aggressive assumptions for the critical steam-oil
ratio; resulting risk to production rates and unit costs given
fixed steam generation capacity; still uncertain Pod One
production timing, rates, final costs, and ultimate bitumen
recovery until reservoir quality can be proven during production;
an inherently high breakeven price in commercial operation and
margin uncertainties; and the comparatively small size of the
project sponsor (though experienced).  The ratings also reflect
the early stage of appraisal drilling across Algar and Pods Three,
Four, Five, and Six and potentially thin asset coverage if third
party engineer GLJ Petroleum Consultant's low case reserve
estimate turns out to be more accurate than its expected or high
cases.

Partial risk mitigants include GLJ's more advanced evaluations of
the Pod One and Algar resource bases which provide, in combination
with Connacher's conventional oil and gas and refining assets,
adequate asset coverage relative to the rating; a one-year fully
funded debt service reserve in support of the notes; existing cash
flow that covers interest expense; significant equity funding; and
fully committed front end funding for Algar.

Other risk mitigants include low reserve replacement risk (though
oil sands reservoir quality, bitumen production rates, recovery
percentage, costs, and all-in economics will vary across the
acreage) and a small degree of discretionary cash flow support of
capital needs if refining margins and natural gas prices remain
sound.  Connacher's natural gas production provides a partial
economic hedge to its very high SAGD natural gas costs and its
refinery production provides an economic hedge to both its bitumen
diluent costs, diluted bitumen selling price, and the price
differentials between heavy sour and light sweet crude oil prices.

Connacher's oil sands properties span 95,000 acres 50 miles
southwest of Fort McMurray, Alberta.  Connacher had identified up
to 8 pods of oil sands deposits with potential commercial
viability.  Its Great Divide project employs SAGD technology that
has been used successfully for more than 8 years in the region and
has had 21 years of pilot testing and then commercial application
in the Alberta oil sands region. Upstream SAGD project cost
escalation has been significantly less severe than mining and
downstream integrated oil sands developments.

The ratings also benefit from Great Divide's attractive location
in the midst of ample pipeline, utilities, and road
infrastructures; a seasoned, though lean, project management team,
assisted by a recognized oil sands project contractors; and a
seasoned though small sponsor with demonstrated access to equity
capital.  Great Divide benefits from comprehensive third party
engineering and market evaluation studies by major recognized
consultants and Pod One and Algar were evaluated with 3-D seismic
imaging to assess reservoir thickness, horizontal consistency of
the lower boundary of their bitumen sand formations, heterogeneity
and permeability barriers, and by well control from appraisal
wells and well corings.

Together with CDN$103 million of first-in cash equity from
Connacher, TLB proceeds and revolver borrowings funded Pod One's
approximately CDN$310 million (CDN$265 million excluding
capitalized interest and sunk costs) completion cost roughly on
time and a manageable 20% over budget.  TLB and the original
revolver will be repaid with note proceeds, with remaining note
proceeds, revolver borrowings, and cash flow funding Algar's
estimated CDN$438 million cost (CDN$326 million before capitalized
interest).  Algar's capitalized interest is higher than Pod One's
principally due to Pod One's significant equity funding.

With Pod One having regulatory approval and Algar awaiting
approval, Connacher may seek Pod Three and Four approvals in late
2008 or 2009.  As of June 30, 2007, GLJ viewed Connacher to have
sufficient appraisal well count and spacing, well log, coring, and
3-D seismic data to assign best estimates of 49.4 million barrels
of proven net bitumen reserves, 159.4 million net barrels of
proven and probable bitumen reserves (2P), and 215.3 million net
barrels of proven, probable, and possible reserves (3P) based on
GLJ's flat price assumption.

Connacher Oil and Gas Limited is headquartered in Calgary,
Alberta, Canada.


CONSTELLATION BRANDS: Buying Fortune's Wine Biz for $885 Million
----------------------------------------------------------------
Constellation Brands Inc. and Fortune Brands Inc. have entered
into an agreement under which Constellation will acquire Fortune's
U.S. wine business for $885 million, subject to post-closing
adjustments. The transaction is expected to close by Dec. 31,
2007.
    
The business to be acquired includes some of California's
wineries.  The portfolio represents approximately 2.6 million
cases.  Brands to be acquired include Clos du Bois and Geyser Peak
and Wild Horse.  More than 1,500 acres of vineyards in Napa,
Sonoma and Carneros, California, are included in the purchase, in
addition to five California wineries.
    
"This portfolio is an excellent fit and furthers our strategy of
exceeding consumer expectations and expanding our presence in the
growing high-end segments of the wine market," Rob Sands,
Constellation Brands president and chief executive officer, said.  

"We are delighted about the prospect of adding these wineries and
brands to our existing portfolio, which will enhance our growing
position in the U.S. premium wine business," Mr. Sands added.  "As
an example, Clos du Bois, a two million case brand, has a history
of strong consumer brand equity, growth and profitability.  We
also look forward to working with the people who have been
responsible for the tremendous success of these wines."
    
The company estimates that on a comparable basis this acquisition
will be slightly accretive to diluted earnings per share for
fiscal 2009 and modestly dilutive for fiscal 2008, assuming the
transaction closes by Dec. 31, 2007.  

A plan for the integration of this acquisition into Constellation
will be finalized after the close of the transaction, and the
company will determine the best way to effectively assimilate the
brands and facilities.  The transaction will be financed with debt
and is subject to customary and routine regulatory approvals and
other closing conditions.
   
                   About Fortune Brands Inc.

Headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois, Fortune Brands Inc. (NYSE:
FO)-- http://www.fortunebrands.com/-- is a holding company with  
subsidiaries engaged in the manufacture, production and sale of
home and hardware products, spirits and wine, and golf products.  
The company operates through three segments: Home and Hardware,
Spirits and Wine, and Golf.  Home and Hardware includes kitchen
and bathroom faucets and accessories; kitchen and bath cabinetry;
residential entry door and patio door systems; vinyl-framed
windows; locks, and tool storage and organization products.  
Spirits and Wine includes products made, marketed or distributed
by Beam Global Spirits & Wine, Inc. (BGSW) subsidiaries or
affiliates.  Golf includes golf balls, golf clubs, golf shoes and
gloves manufactured, marketed or distributed by Acushnet Company
(Acushnet).

                   About Constellation Brands

Headquartered in Fairport, New York, Constellation Brands Inc.
(NYSE: STZ, ASX: CBR) -- http://www.cbrands.com/-- is an    
international producer and marketer of beverage alcohol in the
wine, spirits and imported beer categories, with significant
market presence in the U.S., Canada, U.K., Australia and New
Zealand.  The company has more than 250 brands in its portfolio,
sales in approximately 150 countries and operates approximately 60
wineries, distilleries and distribution facilities.


CONSTELLATION BRANDS: Fortune Deal Cues Fitch to Hold Ratings
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the ratings of Constellation Brands
Inc. following the company's announcement that it had entered into
a definitive agreement to acquire Fortune Brands, Inc.'s U.S. wine
business for $885 million.

Fitch has affirmed these ratings:

  -- Issuer Default Rating 'BB-';
  -- Bank credit facility 'BB-';
  -- Senior unsecured notes to 'BB-';
  -- Senior subordinated notes 'B+'.

The Rating Outlook is Negative.

Fitch's ratings apply to STZ's $3.9 billion credit facilities,
$1.9 billion of senior unsecured debt, and $250 million of senior
subordinated notes.

The affirmation reflects the addition of market leading premium
and super premium wines to STZ's already solid position in the U.
S. market and around the world.  STZ maintains leading market
shares in most of the major wine markets around the globe and a
diversified alcoholic beverage portfolio and has an excellent
track record of integrating acquisitions.  The company has
restructured acquired operations to enhance productivity and has
sold non-essential assets, which has provided some proceeds to
reduce debt.  Of concern is STZ willingness to operate at higher
leverage levels and its appetite for acquisitions.  Over the
intermediate term, it is likely that the company will continue to
make acquisitions that may result in financial and operational
stress.

The company's debt levels are expected to be meaningfully higher
at the end of fiscal 2008 (ending Feb. 29, 2008). Leverage has
grown as a result of successive debt financed acquisitions and
stock repurchases, including an accelerated share repurchase
transaction in May 2007.  As a result, interest expense has
increased and coverage measures have weakened considerably over
the past couple of years. As of Aug. 31, 2007, pro forma for the
acquisition of FO's wine business, debt/EBITDA (unadjusted for
acquisition-related integration costs and restructuring and
related charges) would be approaching 6.0 times, while
EBITDA/interest would be slightly above 2.5x.  Nonetheless, the
strong fit of FO's wine brands, the high growth rates for the
super-premium category and some reduction in debt in the near term
are expected to improve these numbers in the short-term.  Ongoing
difficulties in U.K. and Australian operations and a reduction in
U.S. distributor inventory levels, which have affected cash flow,
are also expected to abate in calendar 2008.


COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL: Loan Fundings Drops 48% in October 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------
Countrywide Financial Corporation released operational data for
the month ended Oct. 31, 2007.

Key operational results include:

     * Mortgage loan fundings for the month of October 2007
       totaled $22 billion, a 48% decline from October 2006.

     * Average daily mortgage loan application activity for
       October 2007 was $1.8 billion, a 34% decrease from October
       2006.  The mortgage loan pipeline was $41 billion at
       Oct. 31, 2007, as compared to $61 billion for the same
       period last year.

     * The mortgage loan servicing portfolio continued to grow,
       reaching $1.47 trillion at Oct. 31, 2007.  This is an
       increase of $202 billion, or 16%, from Oct. 31, 2006.

     * Banking Operations' assets were $106 billion at Oct. 31,
       2007, which compares to $83 billion at Oct. 31, 2006.

     * Securities trading volume in the Capital Markets segment of
       $260 billion for October 2007 was 13% lower when compared
       to the same month last year.

     * Net earned premiums from the Insurance segment were
       $136 million in October 2007, up 35% from October 2006.

"October's operating results continue to be indicative of current
market trends," said David Sambol, President and Chief Operating
Officer.  "Total fundings were down substantially on a year-over-
year basis, but were up 4% from the prior month, and production
funded through the Bank has now surpassed 90 percent of total
fundings.  Average daily applications and the mortgage loan
pipeline were essentially flat from the prior month.  At $42
million, subprime fundings for the month of October 2007 were just
0.2 percent of total mortgage loan fundings."

"Countrywide continues to work diligently toward mitigating the
consequences our borrowers are facing as a result of the current
market conditions," Mr. Sambol continued.  "As such, we have
recently launched our $16 billion home ownership preservation
initiative to help borrowers facing, or who have already
experienced, interest rate resets.  We have also reached out to
the community at large through various partnership initiatives
with consumer housing groups such as the Neighborhood Assistance
Corporation of America, the Homeownership Preservation Foundation,
and NeighborWorks(R) America."

                   About Countrywide Financial
    
Based in Calabasas, California, Countrywide Financial Corporation
(NYSE: CFC) -- http://www.countrywide.com/-- is a diversified       
financial services provider.  Through its family of companies,
Countrywide originates, purchases, securitizes, sells, and
services residential and commercial loans; provides loan closing
services such as credit reports, appraisals and flood
determinations; offers banking services which include depository
and home loan products; conducts fixed income securities
underwriting and trading activities; provides property, life and
casualty insurance; and manages a captive mortgage reinsurance
company.

                          *     *     *

The company continues to carry Moody's Ba2 long-term rating.


DANA CORP: Judge Lifland Rejects Jasco's $20 Million Claim
----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Honorable Burton R. Lifland of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York refused to abstain from
hearing on Dana Corp. and its debtor-affiliates' objection to the
$20,000,000 claim asserted by Jasco Tools, Inc.

In a 15-page opinion, Judge Lifland explained that mandatory
abstention does not apply to core proceedings and that
proceedings for the allowance or disallowance of claims are
"core."  Judge Lifland continued that because nothing is more
directly at the core of bankruptcy administration than the
quantification of all liabilities of the debtor, the bankruptcy
court's determination whether to allow or disallow a claim is a
core function.  Moreover, abstention is "an extraordinary and
narrow exception to the duty of the federal courts to adjudicate
controversies which are properly before it," Judge Lifland added.

Judge Lifland also refused to lift the automatic stay to permit
Jasco to continue prosecuting the lawsuit it filed against Dana
Corp. and a supplier, Nationwide Precision Products Corp., in the
New York Supreme Court, Monroe County.  Judge Lifland says that
allowing the thousands of claims asserted against the Debtors to
continue in courts throughout the county would undermine one of
the main purposes of utilizing Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Judge Lifland notes that Jasco's claim does not raise any
unsettled issues of state law and is not before a specialized
tribunal.

Moreover, Judge Lifland denies Jasco's breach of contract claim
and claim for alleged trade secret misappropriation.  The Court
notes that nothing in the Agreement between Dana and Jasco
required Dana