T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

             Monday, January 29, 2007, Vol. 11, No. 24

                             Headlines

99 CENT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
710 Romero: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
ACE SECURITIES: Fitch Holds Low-B Ratings on Four Class Certs.
ADELPHIA COMMS: Court Okays Stipulation Resolving FPL Note Claims
ADELPHIA COMMS: Court OKs Stipulation Resolving U.S. Bank's Claims

AMERICAN CABINETRY: Case Summary & 26 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ARK #1: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ASSOCIATES GROUP: Case Summary & Four Largest Unsecured Creditors
BALDOR ELECTRIC: Moody's Holds B3 Rating on $550 Million Sr. Notes
BASIC ENERGY: Moody's Rates Amended & Upsized Facility at Ba1

BDO SEIDMAN: Gets Sued by Banco Espirito for $170 Million
BOCA CIEGA: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
BURLINGTON COAT: Poor Performance Prompts S&P's Negative Outlook
CALPINE CORP: Harbinger Submits $100 Million Alternative Offer
CANAL CAPITAL: Todman & Company Raises Going Concern Doubt

CAPITAL AUTO: Fitch Upgrades Rating on Series 2006-1 Class D Notes
CEP HOLDING: Has Until April 18 to Make Lease Related Decisions
CHARTWELL SENIORS: Board Restructures Senior Management Team
CHASEFLEX TRUST: Fitch Puts Low-B Ratings on $4.27 Million Certs.
COOPER COS: Discloses Proposed $1 Billion Refinancing

COPELANDS' ENTERPRISES: Selects Glenn Burdette as Accountants
CORPORATE CONNECTION: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsec. Creditors
DELPHI CORP: Court Lifts Stay Letting Cadence Pursue Patent Suit
DELPHI CORP: Two Panels Want to File Discovery Motion Under Seal
DELPHI CORP: Tower Automotive Wants Stay Lifted to Commence Suit

DIANE OZAROWSKI: Case Summary and Four Largest Unsecured Creditors
DOV PHARMA: May File for Bankruptcy if Restructuring Fails
DURA AUTOMOTIVE: Judge Carey Approves Deloitte & Touche as Auditor
DURA AUTOMOTIVE: Judge Carey Approves Deloitte as Tax Advisor
DURA AUTOMOTIVE: Gets Court Ok to Assume Lear Settlement Agreement

DURA AUTOMOTIVE: Section 341(a) Meeting Will Resume Wednesday
ECHOSTAR COMMS: Fitch Holds Convertible Subor. Notes' Rating at B
EDDIE BAUER: Defers Special Stockholders Meeting to February 8
ENTERGY NEW: Panel Says Documents Are Not Entitled to Protection
FIRST HORIZON: Fitch Holds Low-B Ratings on 8 Class  Certificates

FLINTKOTE COMPANY: Wants Court to Extend Exclusive Periods
FLINTKOTE CO: Wants Until April 27 to Decide on Headquarters Lease
FORD MOTOR: Exec Bonuses May Hamper Cost-Cutting Deal with Union
FREMONT GENERAL: Fitch Revises Outlook to Negative from Stable
G.M. CROCETTI: Case Summary & Three Largest Unsecured Creditors

GALAXY MINERALS: Case Summary & List of Known Creditors
GAP INC: Company Not for Sale, Interim CEO Fisher Tells Employees
GENERAL MOTORS: GMAC's Mortgage Exposure May Hit GM, Analysts Say
GENERAL MOTORS: Plans to Sell Allison Transmission to Cut Costs
GLOBAL HOME: Judge Gross Extends Exclusivity Period to April 5

GLOBAL HOME: Taps Johnson Associates as Compensation Advisor
GLOBAL HOME: Wants Until July 15 to Remove State Court Civil Suits
GLOBAL TEL*LINK: Moody's Affirms Corporate Family Rating at B1
GREENPARK RUNKLE: Case Summary & Largest Unsecured Creditor
HAROLD LISONBEE: Case Summary & 10 Largest Unsecured Creditors

HC CARRIBEAN: Must File Plan and Disclosure Statement by March 15
HEADWATERS INC: Completes Sale of 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes
INDIAN CREEK: Chapter 7 Trustee Hires Luce Forward as Counsel
LA SPECIALTY: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
LBUBS: Fitch Affirms Rating on $5 Mil. Class N Certificates at BB-

LEHMAN XS: Moody's Assigns B2 Ratings on Class A-4 Notes
LIBERTY TAX: December 15 Balance Sheet Upside-Down by $28.6 Mil.
LIFECARE HOLDINGS: Moody's Junks Rating on $150 Mil. Senior Notes
MAVERICK MATERIALS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
MERRILL LYNCH: Fitch Holds Low-B Ratings on 7 Class Certificates

MIRANT CORP: Mirant Lovett Wants More Time to File Plan
MOSAIC COMPANY: Potential Earnings Loss Cues Fitch's Neg. Watch
MS 1997-XL1: Fitch Holds Junk Ratings on Class G & H Certificates
NASDAQ STOCK: Offer Price Hinders Takeover Talks with LSE
NEWCASTLE CDO: Fitch Holds Rating on $16 Mil. Class V Notes at BB

NEWPARK RESOURCES: SEC Filing Prompts Moody's Stable Outlook
NICHOLAS-APPLEGATE: Moody's Junks Rating on $10 Mil. Class D Notes
NORTEL NETWORKS: Ontario Court Approves $2.5 Billion Settlement
OCA INC: Court Confirms Plan of Reorganization
OPIMIAN GROUP: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

PAMELA STOCKFISH: Case Summary & Four Largest Unsecured Creditors
PROPEX INC: Inks Second Amendment to Credit Agreement
QUIGLEY CO: Wants Pfizer DIP Financing Extended Until August 13
QUIGLEY CO: Asks Court to Move Removal of Actions Period to Aug. 1
SCOTT WILLIAMS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

SCOTTISH RE: Rejects Brandes Investment's Proposal
SIGNAL PROCESSING: Receives Nasdaq Common Stock Delisting Notice
SIL CLEAN: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SILICON VALLEY: Fitch Rates $8.9 Million Series 2007D Bonds at B
SMART WORLD: Court Confirms Panel's Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation

SOLUTIA INC: Seeks May 7 Deadline to File Notices of Removal
SOLUTIA INC: Balks at Panel's Intervention in Calpine Arbitration
TERRA CAPITAL: Fitch Rates Proposed Senior Unsecured Notes at B+
TERRA CAPITAL: S&P Rates Proposed $330 Million Senior Notes at BB-
TERRA INDUSTRIES: S&P Lifts Corp. Credit Rating to BB- from B+

TIMKEN CO: To Invest $60 Million on Steel Rolling Mill Operations
TOWER AUTOMOTIVE: Wants Stay Lifted in Delphi's Case to Start Suit
TOWER RECORDS: Committee Hires Keen Realty as Real Estate Advisor
TRAINER WORTHAM: Moody's Junks Rating on $10 Mil. Class A-3L Notes
U.S. DRY: Inks Merger Agreement with Cleaners Club

U.S. DRY: Sells 15.7 Units to 11 Accredited Investors
UGS CORP: Siemens Deal May Prompt Moody's Ratings Withdrawal
UGS CORP: Siemens Deal Cues S&P's Positive CreditWatch
UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS: Wants Plan-Filing Period Extended to July 11
USA COMMERCIAL: Court Confirms Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan

VIA VENETO: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
VISKASE COS: S&P Holds CCC Credit Rating and Removes Neg. Watch
WILLIAM SIGMAN: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
WINTHROP HEALTHCARE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

* Cohen & Grigsby Hires Lisa Hofbauer as Estates Group Associate
* MorrisAnderson Promotes Larry Hennessy to Principal
* Litigation Solution Launches New Legal Notification Services

* BOND PRICING: For the week of January 22 - January 26, 2006

                             *********

99 CENT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 99 Cent Stuff, Inc.
        1801 Clint Moore Road
        Suite 205
        Boca Raton, FL 33487

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-10474

Type of Business: The Debtor is a single-priced value retailer of
                  primarily name-brand, consumable merchandise.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 24, 2007

Court: Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)

Judge: Steven H. Friedman

Debtor's Counsel: Robert C Furr, Esq.
                  Furr & Cohen
                  2255 Glades Road #337W
                  Boca Raton, FL 33431
                  Tel: (561) 395-0500
                  Fax: (561) 338-7532


Total Assets: $5,701,735

Total Debts:  $29,064,838

Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                                           Claim Amount
   ------                                           ------------
   Bank of America NA                                 $4,900,000
   CCS Private Bank
   M01-800-08-11
   414 Union Street
   Nashville, TN 37219

   Blue Ribbon Commodity Traders Inc.                 $2,427,275
   1300 Virginia Drive #145
   Fort Washington, PA 19034

   Bunzl South Florida                                   $92,880
   P.Oo Box 402337
   Atlanta, GA 30384

   Regent Products                                       $80,040

   Digiview Productions/Idb Factors                      $66,354

   J M Dist.                                             $61,950

   Sey Culhan Refrigeration & A/C Serv                   $61,215

   Sun Hing Foods, Inc.                                  $60,854

   King Zak Industries, Inc.                             $58,413

   Hangzhou Sunrise Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd                 $53,786

   Magic Creation                                        $53,527

   Flowers Baking Co. of Miami                           $53,118

   Jean Philippe Frag, H.C.                              $51,445

   La Fe Food                                            $48,301

   Purity Foods                                          $47,478

   Deals 4 Less                                          $43,641

   CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc.                           $42,739

   Genmert                                               $42,517

   Rokeach Foods                                         $41,608

   Allied International                                  $41,018


710 Romero: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------
Debtor: 710 Romero LLC
        201 Mesa Lane
        Santa Barbara, CA 93109

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-10093

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 24, 2007

Court: Central District Of California (Santa Barbara)

Judge: Robin Riblet

Debtor's Counsel: Robert E Hurlbett, Esq.
                  Steven Pinsker, Esq.
                  Pinsker & Hurlbett
                  1316 Anacapa Street
                  Santa Barbara, CA 93101
                  Tel: (805) 963-9111

Total Assets: $4,000,000


Total Debts:  $3,996,000

The Debtor does not have any unsecured creditors who are not
insiders.


ACE SECURITIES: Fitch Holds Low-B Ratings on Four Class Certs.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch has taken rating actions on these classes of Ace Securities
Corporation issues:

Series 2002-HE3:

   -- Class A affirmed at 'AAA';

   -- Class M-1 affirmed at 'AA+;

   -- Class M-2 downgraded to 'BBB' from 'A' and removed from
      Rating Watch Negative;

   -- Class M-3 downgraded to 'B' from 'BB'.

Series 2004-HE1

   -- Class A affirmed at 'AAA';
   -- Class M-1 affirmed at 'AA';
   -- Class M-2 affirmed at 'A';
   -- Class M-3 affirmed at 'A-';
   -- Class M-4 affirmed at 'BBB';
   -- Class M-5 downgraded to 'B+' from 'BB';
   -- Class M-6 downgraded to 'B' from 'BB-'.
   
Series 2005-HE2

   -- Class A affirmed at 'AAA';
   -- Class M-1 affirmed at 'AA+';
   -- Class M-2 affirmed at 'AA';
   -- Class M-3 affirmed at 'AA-';
   -- Class M-4 affirmed at 'A+';
   -- Class M-5 affirmed at 'A+';
   -- Class M-6 affirmed at 'A';
   -- Class M-7 affirmed at 'A-';
   -- Class M-8 affirmed at 'BBB+;
   -- Class M-9 affirmed at 'BBB';
   -- Class M-10 affirmed at 'BBB-';
   -- Class B-1 affirmed at 'BB+';
   -- Class B-2 rated 'BB', placed on Rating Watch Negative.

Series 2005-HE3

   -- Class A affirmed at 'AAA';
   -- Class M-1 affirmed at 'AA+';
   -- Class M-2 affirmed at 'AA';
   -- Class M-3 affirmed at 'AA-';
   -- Class M-4 affirmed at 'A+';
   -- Class M-5 affirmed at 'A';
   -- Class M-6 affirmed at 'A-';
   -- Class M-7 affirmed at 'BBB+;
   -- Class M-8 affirmed at 'BBB';
   -- Class M-9 affirmed at 'BBB-';
   -- Class B-1 affirmed at 'BB+';
   -- Class B-2 rated 'BB', placed on Rating Watch Negative.

Series 2005-HE6

   -- Class A affirmed at 'AAA';
   -- Class M-1 affirmed at 'AA+';
   -- Class M-2 affirmed at 'AA';
   -- Class M-3 affirmed at 'AA-';
   -- Class M-4 affirmed at 'AA-';
   -- Class M-5 affirmed at 'A+';
   -- Class M-6 affirmed at 'A';
   -- Class M-7 affirmed at 'A-';
   -- Class M-8 affirmed at 'BBB+';
   -- Class M-9 affirmed at 'BBB';
   -- Class M-10 affirmed at 'BBB-';
   -- Class M-11 affirmed at 'BB+';
   -- Class B-1 affirmed at 'BB'.

Series 2005-RM2

   -- Class A affirmed at 'AAA';
   -- Class M-1 affirmed at 'AA+';
   -- Class M-2 affirmed at 'AA+';
   -- Class M-3 affirmed at 'AA';
   -- Class M-4 affirmed at 'AA-';
   -- Class M-5 affirmed at 'A+';
   -- Class M-6 affirmed at 'A';
   -- Class M-7 affirmed at 'A-;
   -- Class M-8 affirmed at 'A-';
   -- Class M-9 affirmed at 'BBB+';
   -- Class M-10 affirmed at 'BBB';
   -- Class M-11 affirmed at 'BBB-';
   -- Class B-1, rated 'BB', placed on Rating Watch Negative.

The mortgage pool consists of conventional, first and second lien,
adjustable- and fixed-rate residential mortgages.  The mortgage
loans were acquired by various originators, including Fremont
Investment & Loan and Ameriquest Mortgage Company.  A majority of
the loans are serviced by Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, rated 'RPS2'
by Fitch.

The affirmations reflect an adequate relationship between credit
enhancement and expected loss and affect approximately
$2.57 billion in outstanding certificates.  The downgrades of
classes M-2 and M-3 of series 2002-HE3 and classes M-5 and M-6 of
series 2004-HE1 affect approximately $29.80 million of the
outstanding certificates.  Select classes from 2005 vintage
transactions, with the exception of series 2005-HE6, are placed on
Rating Watch Negative, affecting approximately $27 million of the
outstanding certificates.

The negative rating actions reflect continued deterioration in the
relationship between CE and future loss expectations.  The
transactions affected by the downgrades are generally experiencing
monthly losses that exceed the available excess spread, resulting
in substantial deterioration of overcollateralization and
preventing the OC from maintaining its target amount.  As of the
December 2006 distribution, the OC for series 2002-HE3 has
declined six months in a row and its OC amount of $1.95 million or
2.77% of the current collateral balance is below the target amount
of $3.49 million or 4.95% of the current collateral balance.  The
OC for series 2004-HE1 has been depleted but class B of amount
$6.98 million is currently providing CE for class M-6.

Three classes from the 2005 vintage transactions were placed on
Rating Watch Negative due to early trends in the relationship
between serious delinquency and CE.  These transactions have
delinquency figures above the industry average.  In addition, they
are generally experiencing monthly losses which have exceeded the
available XS and have prevented the OC from maintaining their
target amounts.

For 2005-HE2, the amount of loans in Foreclosure and REO at
21 months seasoning as a percentage of the current pool balance is
7.03%.  The subordination of the B-2 class is 1.01%.  The XS
available to cover losses as an annualized percentage of the
current pool balance is approximately 1.07%.  The OC has declined
four out of the last five months and its OC amount of
$5.88 million or 1.01% of the current collateral balance is below
the target amount of $7.32 million or 1.26% of the current
collateral balance.

For 2005-HE3, the amount of loans in Foreclosure and REO at 20
months seasoning as a percentage of the current pool balance is
7.32%.  The subordination of the B-2 class is 1.97%.  The XS
available to cover losses as an annualized percentage of the
current pool balance is approximately 0.96%.  The OC has declined
three out of the last five months and its OC amount of
$3.89 million or 0.63% of the current collateral balance is below
the target amount of $5.45 million or 0.89% of the current
collateral balance.


For 2005-RM2, the amount of loans in Foreclosure and REO at 19
months seasoning as a percentage of the current pool balance is
6.40%.  The subordination of the B-1 class is 4.15%.  The XS
available to cover losses as an annualized percentage of the
current pool balance is approximately 1.06%.  The OC has declined
five months in a row and its OC amount of $5.35 million or 1.92%
of the current collateral balance is below the target amount of
$6.51 million or 2.33% of the current collateral balance.

The pools are seasoned from a range of 48 to 15 months.  The
transactions have pool factors ranging from 10% to 69%.

Fitch will closely monitor the relationship between XS and monthly
losses for those transactions in the upcoming months.  If the
losses continue to exceed XS, the ratings will be reassessed.


ADELPHIA COMMS: Court Okays Stipulation Resolving FPL Note Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Robert E. Gerber of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York approved a stipulation between
Adelphia Communications Corp. and its debtor-affiliates and the
noteholders of Fort Myers Acquisition L.P., concerning 10 proofs
of claim arising from a $108,000,000 term note issued on
Oct. 1, 1999 by Fort Myers.

In accordance with the Bar Date Order dated Oct. 24, 2003,
West Boca Security Inc. filed these 10 proofs of claim.  Ft. Myers
is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Olympus Communications,
L.P.  Olympus pledged certain collateral to secure Ft. Myers'
obligations under the Note.

The ACOM Debtors' First Modified Fifth Amended Chapter 11 Plan
classifies the Note as Claim Class SD 7 -- FPL Note Claims.

The FPL Note was assigned to West Boca and subsequently
transferred to Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc.

On May 17, 2005, the ACOM Debtors sought to disallow nine of the
FPL Note Claims on the grounds that they were duplicative.

On June 21, 2005, the Court disallowed Claim Nos. 16069, 16072,
16077, 16076, and 16111.  The hearing to the ACOM Debtors'
objection to Claim Nos. 16078, 16070, 16071, and 16112 was
adjourned to a date to be determined.

Pursuant to the Plan, as confirmed, the FPL Note Claims will be
allowed for $127,435,663, in aggregate, comprising:

   (a) $108,000,000 initial principal; and
   (b) $19,435,663 represents additional amounts accrued through
       the Petition Date.

In the Court-approved Stipulation, the ACOM Debtors and the Ft.
Myers noteholders agree that:

   (1) Claim No. 16068 will:

         * be allowed for $127,435,663, in aggregate;

         * be deemed to have been filed against both Ft. Myers
           and Olympus; and

         * otherwise receive the treatment provided for the FPL
           Note Claim in the Plan.

   (2) upon the occurrence of the Effective Date of the Plan,
       Claim Nos. 16078, 16070, 16071, and 16112 will be
       disallowed and expunged; and

   (3) the Stipulation will have no force or effect if the
       Effective Date of the Plan does not occur.

                      About Adelphia Comms

Based in Coudersport, Pa., Adelphia Communications Corporation
(OTC: ADELQ) -- http://www.adelphia.com/-- is a cable television
company.  Adelphia serves customers in 30 states and Puerto Rico,
and offers analog and digital video services, Internet access and
other advanced services over its broadband networks.  The Company
and its more than 200 affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection
in the Southern District of New York on June 25, 2002.  Those
cases are jointly administered under case number 02-41729.
Willkie Farr & Gallagher represents the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  PricewaterhouseCoopers serves as the
Debtors' financial advisor.  Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman,
LLP, and Klee, Tuchin, Bogdanoff & Stern LLP represent the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

Adelphia Cablevision Associates of Radnor, L.P., and 20 of its
affiliates, collectively known as Rigas Manged Entities, are
entities that were previously held or controlled by members of the
Rigas family.  In March 2006, the rights and titles to these
entities were transferred to certain subsidiaries of Adelphia
Cablevision, LLC.  The RME Debtors filed for chapter 11 protection
on March 31, 2006 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 06-10622 through
06-10642).  Their cases are jointly administered under Adelphia
Communications and its debtor-affiliates chapter 11 cases.  
(Adelphia Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 162; Bankruptcy Creditors'
Service, Inc., http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 9, 2007, the
Honorable Robert E. Gerber of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York has entered an order confirming the
first modified fifth amended joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization of Adelphia Communications Corporation and Certain
Affiliated Debtors.


ADELPHIA COMMS: Court OKs Stipulation Resolving U.S. Bank's Claims
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Robert E. Gerber of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York approved a stipulation between
the U.S. Bank National Association, FrontierVision Holdings, L.P.
and its affiliates, Arahova Communications, Inc., and Adelphia
Communications Corp. and its debtor-affiliates relating to U.S.
Bank's alleged tort claims.

Under the Court-approved stipulation, U.S. Bank's claims will be
deemed allowed pursuant to the ACOM Debtors' First Modified Fifth
Amended Plan Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

U.S. Bank National Association is the indenture trustee under:

   (i) seven different series of notes issued by Arahova
       Communications, Inc.,

  (ii) a series of notes issued by FrontierVision Holdings,
       L.P. and FrontierVision Holdings Capital Corporation,

(iii) a series of notes issued by FrontierVision Holdings,
       L.P. and FrontierVision Holdings Capital II Corporation;
       and

  (iv) a series of notes issued by FrontierVision Operating
       Partners, L.P. and FrontierVision Capital Corporation.

As the indenture trustee, U.S. Bank had filed proofs of claim,
some of which are duplicative, against:

   (a) Arahova Communications, Inc., FrontierVision Holdings,
       L.P., FrontierVision Holdings Capital Corporation,
       FrontierVision Holdings Capital II Corporation,
       FrontierVision Operating Partners, L.P. and FrontierVision
       Capital Corporation, as issuers, for principal and
       interest, indenture trustee fees and expenses and
       indemnification owed under the Arahova Notes, the
       FrontierVision Holdco Notes, and the FrontierVision Opco
       Notes; and

   (b) multiple Debtors for, among other things, alleged
       wrongdoing by the Debtors under theories of veil-piercing,
       agency, alter ego, and various torts or other claims.

Pursuant to the ACOM Debtors' Amended Plan, these claims will be
deemed allowed in these principal amounts, and interest accrued
through the Debtors' date of bankruptcy:

   Claims                Principal     Interest     Total Amount
   ------                ---------     --------     ------------
   Arahova Notes    $1,712,003,697  $31,513,889   $1,743,517,586

   FrontierVision      200,000,000    4,277,778      204,277,778
   Opco Notes

   FrontierVision      328,658,000   10,841,149      339,499,148
   Holdco Notes

The Plan also provides for the allowance of the Trustee Fee
Claims and indemnification rights of U.S. Bank.

The Plan provides that claims filed by an indenture trustee for
tort or claims other than for principal, interest, fees and
expenses against the issuers and guarantors of the respective
debt securities under the indentures will be deemed disallowed.

Pursuant to the Plan's provisions, the ACOM Debtors desire to
clean up the claims register maintained in their Chapter 11
cases.

In the Court-approved stipulation, the parties agree that:

   (a) these U.S. Bank Claims will be allowed pursuant to the
       Plan:

       A. Arahova Notes Claims Class (Class SD 6)

          Claim No.         Claim Amount
          ---------         ------------
           494900           $104,420,139
           495000            369,994,768
           495100            105,118,056
           495200            257,520,833
           495300            259,861,111
           495600            229,593,750
           495700            417,008,929
                          --------------
          Total           $1,743,517,586
                          ==============

       B. FrontierVision Holdco Notes Claims Class
          (Class SD 8)

          Claim No.         Claim Amount
          ---------         ------------
           494400            $94,216,596
           494700            245,282,552
                          --------------
          Total             $339,499,148
                          ==============

       C. FrontierVision Opco Notes Claims Class
          (Class SD 9)

          Claim No.         Claim Amount
          ---------         ------------
           495400           $204,277,778
                          --------------
          Total             $204,277,778
                          ==============

   (b) 18 Claims filed by U.S. Bank are disallowed for being
       duplicative with respect to the allowed U.S. Bank Note
       Claims, including:

          Claim No.         Claim Amount
          ---------         ------------
           494500         $1,373,531,620
           494600            207,978,431
           494800            245,410,758
           494300             94,279,450

   (c) disallow U.S. Bank's more than 3,100 claims for tort or
       claims other than for principal, interest, fees and
       expenses against the issuers and guarantors of the
       respective debt securities under the Indentures; and

   (d) the Stipulation will not be effective until the Effective
       Date of the Plan and will be deemed null and void if:

         * the Effective Date does not occur; or

         * the Plan or the order confirming it is reversed or
           vacated, or is modified in a manner adverse to the
           treatment of the U.S. Bank Note Claims.

                      About Adelphia Comms

Based in Coudersport, Pa., Adelphia Communications Corporation
(OTC: ADELQ) -- http://www.adelphia.com/-- is a cable television
company.  Adelphia serves customers in 30 states and Puerto Rico,
and offers analog and digital video services, Internet access and
other advanced services over its broadband networks.  The Company
and its more than 200 affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection
in the Southern District of New York on June 25, 2002.  Those
cases are jointly administered under case number 02-41729.
Willkie Farr & Gallagher represents the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  PricewaterhouseCoopers serves as the
Debtors' financial advisor.  Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman,
LLP, and Klee, Tuchin, Bogdanoff & Stern LLP represent the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

Adelphia Cablevision Associates of Radnor, L.P., and 20 of its
affiliates, collectively known as Rigas Manged Entities, are
entities that were previously held or controlled by members of the
Rigas family.  In March 2006, the rights and titles to these
entities were transferred to certain subsidiaries of Adelphia
Cablevision, LLC.  The RME Debtors filed for chapter 11 protection
on March 31, 2006 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 06-10622 through
06-10642).  Their cases are jointly administered under Adelphia
Communications and its debtor-affiliates chapter 11 cases.  
(Adelphia Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 162; Bankruptcy Creditors'
Service, Inc., http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 9, 2007, the
Honorable Robert E. Gerber of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York has entered an order confirming the
first modified fifth amended joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization of Adelphia Communications Corporation and Certain
Affiliated Debtors.


AMERICAN CABINETRY: Case Summary & 26 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: American Cabinetry, Inc.
             26 Brickyard Road
             Cranbury, NJ 08512

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-11019

Debtor affiliates filing separate chapter 11 petitions:

      Entity                                     Case No.
      ------                                     --------
      Cranbury Company, Inc.                     07-11016
      Cranbury Equipment Co, Inc.                07-11018

Type of Business: The Debtor manufactures wood nonrefrigerated
                  show & display cabinets.

                  The Debtors previously filed for chapter 11
                  protection on May 16, 2001 (Bankr. D. N.J.
                  Case Nos. 01-56027, 01-56030, and 01-56032).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 24, 2007

Court: District of New Jersey (Trenton)

Judge: Raymond T. Lyons Jr.

Debtors' Counsel: Stephen E. Milazzo, Esq.
                  The Law Offices of Stephen E. Milazzo, Esq.
                  44 Old Clove Road
                  Sussex, NJ 07461
                  Tel: (201) 970-9607

                             Estimated Assets     Estimated Debts
                             ----------------     ---------------
American Cabinetry, Inc.     $1 Million to        $1 Million to
                             $100 Million         $100 Million

Cranbury Company, Inc.       $1 Million to        $1 Million to
                             $100 Million         $100 Million

Cranbury Equipment Co, Inc.  $1 Million to        $1 Million to
                             $100 Million         $100 Million

A. American Cabinetry, Inc.'s 26 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                     Nature of Claim       Claim Amount
   ------                     ---------------       ------------
Rex Lumber Company            Trade debt                $397,518
P.O. Box 1776
Englishtown, NJ 07726

PSE&G                         Trade debt                 $55,069
NEW 6253109550
P.O. Box 14106
New Brunswick, NJ 08906-4106

JCP&L                         Trade debt                 $19,810
P.O. Box 3687
Akron, OH 44309-3687

T.J. Wiggins                  Trade debt                 $10,669

Cifelli Disposal Inc.         Trade debt                 $10,653

Roberts Plywood Co.           Trade debt                 $10,200

American Door 7 Window, LLC   Trade debt                  $7,707

Millhurst Trading Co. Inc.    Trade debt                  $6,082

Joule                         Trade debt                  $5,870

Princeton-Somerset Group,     Trade debt                  $5,570
Inc.

Bay Ridge Lumber Laminators   Trade debt                  $5,405
Supply

Top Tech                      Trade debt                  $5,200

Precision Saw & Tool Corp.    Trade debt                  $4,730

Industrial Abrasives Co.      Trade debt                  $4,564

Bellstone                     Trade debt                  $4,243

Sand Stone                    Trade debt                  $3,942

Arizona Premium Finance       Trade debt                  $3,929

Eurovinyl Pluss US LLC        Trade debt                  $3,900

Wiener, Crowley & St. John    Trade debt                  $3,774
Inc.

Capitoline Products           Trade debt                  $3,708

Keyston Abrasives Co.         Trade debt                  $3,464

Atlantic Tool Systems, Inc.   Trade debt                  $3,414

NJ Dept. of Environmental     Statutory                   $2,000
Protection                    violation

Verizon                       Trade debt                  $1,273

Cooperative Communications    Trade debt                    $633
Inc.

Ford Motor Credit                                        Unknown


B. Cranbury Company, Inc., and Cranbury Equipment Co, Inc., does
not have any unsecured creditors who are not insiders.


ARK #1: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Ark #1, LLC
        5440 Morehouse Drive, #4000
        San Diego, CA 92121

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-50058

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 23, 2007

Court: District of Nevada (Reno)

Judge: Gregg W. Zive

Debtor's Counsel: David B. Golubchik, Esq.
                  David L. Neale, Esq.
                  Ovsanna Takvoryan, Esq.
                  Levene, Neale, Bender, Rankin & Brill
                  10250 Constellation Boulevard, Suite 1700
                  Los Angeles, CA 90067
                  Tel: (310) 229-1234

                    --- and ---    

                  Edmond Buddy Miller, Esq.
                  6490 South McCarran Boulevard, Building C
                  Suite 26
                  Reno, NV 89509
                  Tel: (775) 828 9898

Estimated Assets: $1 Million to $100 Million

Estimated Debts:  $1 Million to $100 Million

Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                     Nature of Claim       Claim Amount
   ------                     ---------------       ------------
Counsel of Co-owners          Co-owner dues           $2,201,472
Lakeshore Resort & Yacht Club
c/o Stephen B. Niswanger, Esq.
#5 Innwood Circle, Suite 110
Little Rock, AR 72211

Frederick L. Ludden &         Class action               $31,625
Patricia A. Ludden            plaintiff
c/o Jay Bequette, Esq.
Bequette & Billingsley, P.A.
425 West Capitol Ave., #3200
Little Rock, AR 72201-3556

Jacob J. Schreuder &          Class action               $30,895
Cornelia A. Schreuder         plaintiff
c/o Jay Bequette, Esq.
Bequette & Billingsley, P.A.
425 West Capitol Ave., #3200
Little Rock, AR 72201-3590

Stanley M. Compton &          Class action               $30,171
Carla G. Compton              plaintiff
c/o Jay Bequette, Esq.
Bequette & Billingsley, P.A.
425 West Capitol Ave., #3200
Little Rock, AR 72201-3493

Friedman, Gerald L. & A.C.    Class action               $28,859
                              plaintiff

Michael W. Barker &           Class action               $28,799
Sharon K. Barker              plaintiff

Kennith Buchanan &            Class action               $28,846
Mary Alice Buchanan           plaintiff

Larry Wallace &               Class action               $28,019
Maria Wallace                 plaintiff

Jon Tappan                    Class action               $27,968
                              plaintiff

Booby Joe Wade &              Class action               $27,931
Mary Jo Wade                  plaintiff

Daniel W. Hawkins, Jr. &      Class action               $27,874
Glenda W. Hawkins             plaintiff

Walter R. Oglesby, M.D. &     Class action               $27,544
Kelley Kyte Oglesby           plaintiff

Robert J. Pennington &        Class action               $26,405
Virginia M. Pennington        plaintiff

Robert A. Bahr &              Class action               $26,348
Deborah A. Bahr               plaintiff

W. John Gammage &             Class action               $26,345
Jan V. Gammage                plaintiff

B.R. (Pete) Kennemer &        Class action               $26,286
Mary E. Kennemer              plaintiff

Gary L. Howe &                Class action               $26,252
Sylvia B. Howe                plaintiff

John M. Gathings &            Class action               $25,825
Wanda G. Gathings             plaintiff

Eddie J. Nicholson Jr. &      Class action               $25,750
Sharon H. Nicholson           plaintiff

James C. Henry &              Class action               $25,486
Catherine W. Henry            plaintiff


ASSOCIATES GROUP: Case Summary & Four Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: The Associates Group Pioneer Pines Park
        110 East Avenida Palizada, Suite 201A
        San Clemente, CA 92672

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-10154

Type of Business: The Debtor is a public benefit non-profit
                  corporation.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 18, 2007

Court: Central District Of California (Santa Ana)

Judge: Erithe A. Smith

Debtor's Counsel: James C. Bastian, Jr., Esq.
                  Richard A. Marshack, Esq.
                  Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP
                  26632 Towne Centre Drive, #300
                  Foothill Ranch, CA 92610-2808
                  Tel: (949) 340-3400
                  Fax: (949) 340-3000

Total Assets: $8,831,842

Total Debts:  $8,879,256

Debtor's Four Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                     Nature of Claim       Claim Amount
   ------                     ---------------       ------------
Elynor R. Falk Marital Trust  C Bond Holder           $1,517,667
David Falk Trustee            Accrued Interest
2150 Sunshine Circle North    (12/26/2002 at
Palm Springs, CA 92264        5.5%)

US Bank NA Corporate Trust    2005 Trustee Fees           $2,500
Services
Attn: President or CFO
633 West Fifth Street
24th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071

Dewey Pest Control            Trade Creditor                 $83
Attn: President or CFO        Account No. 763784
P.O. Box 7114                 and 759022
Pasadena, CA 91109-7214

First Advantage               Trade Creditor                 $37
Attn: President or CFO        Account No. 70305


BALDOR ELECTRIC: Moody's Holds B3 Rating on $550 Million Sr. Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed the B1 corporate family
rating of Baldor Electric Company along with the Ba3 ratings for
the proposed senior secured credit facilities and B3 ratings for
the proposed $550 million senior unsecured notes following the
company's disclosure that the company intends to eliminate a
preferred stock issuance from its previously reported financing
plans.

The rating outlook is stable.

These first-time ratings are subject to final documentation.

Proceeds from the proposed debt offerings, together with proceeds
from the issuances of common stock will be used to fund the
$1.8 billion acquisition of the Power System businesses of
Rockwell Automation, Inc., refinance existing debt and pay
transaction fees. Initial financing plans included the use of $150
million preferred stock, which the rating agency treated as 100%
equity.  

The revised plans eliminate the preferred stock offering and
increase the term loan to $1.050 billion from $1 billion, use
$25 million of borrowings under the revolving credit facility
instead of remaining undrawn at close and the use of an additional
$75 million of equity to fund the acquisition of the power system
businesses.  

Depending on market conditions, the equity offering could be
increased as much as $75 million.  Any additional net proceeds
would be first applied to borrowings under the revolver, then the
term loan.  The transaction is expected to be completed in the
first quarter of 2007.

Ratings affirmed with a stable outlook:

   -- B1 corporate family rating

   -- B1 probability of default rating, LGD4, 50% loss given
      default assessment

   -- Ba3, LGD3, 35% for the $1.05 billion senior secured term
      loan maturing in 2014

   -- Ba3, LGD3, 35% for the $200 million senior secured
      revolving credit facility maturing in 2012

   -- B3, LGD5, 87% for the $550 million senior unsecured notes

   -- SGL-1 speculative grade liquidity rating

Ratings withdrawn as a result of this action:

   -- B3, LGD6, 98% for the $150 million mandatorily convertible
      preferred stock

The initial B1 corporate family rating reflects the high levels of
debt required to consummate the acquisition of the Power Systems
businesses, modest free cash flow expected in 2007 and significant
reliance on and susceptibility to downturns in the North American
industrial sector.  The ratings acknowledge Baldor's enhanced
competitive position, particularly in the North American
industrial electric motors market, strong brand recognition,
reputation for quality products and strong operating margins.

Further, the rating agency believes the Power System businesses
fit nicely with the existing Baldor business resulting in a
company capable of providing end to end solutions through the
power conversion cycle.  Despite the relative size of the
transaction, Moody's believes integration risk will be low and
that cost synergies will be modest in the next two years.  Upward
rating momentum will be dependent on the company's ability to
generate strong cash flows and reduce the acquisition related
debt.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that the combined company
will grow organically throughout the assimilation process over the
12 to 18 month period following the acquisition and that modest
free cash flow generation will be used to de-leverage.  The
outlook incorporates an expectation that the global motor market
will continue to expand and that the company will expand
internationally as a result.

The previous rating action for Baldor was the Jan. 9, 2007
assignment of its B1 corporate family ratings, Ba3 senior secured
rating, B3 senior unsecured rating and the B3 preferred stock
rating.

Baldor Electric Company is a leading manufacturer of industrial
electric motors, drives and generators.  Baldor is headquartered
in Fort Smith, Arkansas.  Power Systems is a leading provider of
Dodge power transmission products, including mounted bearings and
enclosed gearing, and Reliance Electric industrial motors,
including large AC and custom, variable speed and specialty, and
small and medium AC motors.  After this transaction, the motor
business will represent 64% of sales, Dodge 28%, motion control
and drives 7% and generators 2%.  Pro forma revenue for 2006 will
likely exceed $1.8 billion.


BASIC ENERGY: Moody's Rates Amended & Upsized Facility at Ba1
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's assigned a Ba1 and LGD2, 19% rating to Basic Energy
Services, Inc.'s amended and upsized secured revolving credit
facility.

Moody's also affirmed Basic's Ba3 corporate family rating and the
Ba3 probability of default rating.

The outlook is stable.

Based on the LGD notching methodology and the increased size of
the senior secured revolver in the pro forma capital structure,
the senior note ratings remain B1 but the LGD assessment is
changing from LGD4, 67% to LGD5, 74%.

Moody's will withdraw the Baa3 rating rating on the existing
secured credit facility upon closing of the new facility.  The
upsized revolver is rated Ba1 under the LGD methodology given the
increased size and relative proportion of the capital structure
and the expectation that Basic will utilize a portion of the
facility.

The first lien revolving credit facility is being upsized from
$150 million to $225 million to help fund BAS' acquisition
strategy but also to provide continued financial flexibility as
the company pursues additional acquisition opportunities.  BAS
recently it has agreed to acquire JetStar for an estimated
$120 million which will add approximately 35,000 horsepower of
pressure pumping in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas, and follows BAS'
strategy of gaining scale and diversification through
acquisitions.

It will be financed through a $43.5 million common stock issuance
with the remaining proceeds coming from borrowings under the
expanded revolver which is more of a debt mix than Moody's had
anticipated.  

However, Moody's notes that the JetStar acquisition will be BAS's
largest acquisition to date and Moody's will be closely monitoring
how BAS will fund future acquisitions and whether it maintains its
overall moderate credit profile, especially as there are signs
that the oilfield services could see some softer market conditions
ahead.

Pro-forma for JetStar, BAS is expected to have approximately
$77 million outstanding under its revolving credit facility.
It does not appear that the company has any near-term debt
reduction plans, and it seems that BAS intends to maintain a
larger debt balance in the future.  Nevertheless, debt to EBITDA,
at 1.5x, is well within acceptable ranges for the current ratings.

The Ba3 corporate family rating reflects Basic's improved scale
and diversification of both its products and services as well as
improved regional diversification through several acquisitions
over the past three years, which combined with the strong market
conditions has resulted in EBITDA tripling during that time.  The
ratings are also supported by more than 50% of the company's
operating earnings coming from more durable and less price
sensitive well-services segment which focuses on existing oil and
gas production.  Moreover, financial metrics including debt/EBITDA
and EBIT/Interest are extremely robust as a result of the cyclical
peak and currently compare favorably to its Ba3 rated oilfield
services peer group.

The Ba3 ratings also reflect the inherent volatility and
cyclicality of the oilfield services business.  Moody's expects
that cash flows from BAS' drilling related business would be
pressured if drilling activity declines due to lower price
environment and result in significantly lower earnings and
cashflows.

In addition, the Ba3 reflects the company's still relatively small
scale compared to the largest competitors, the company's
concentration on the mature US market, and the integration and
event risk given the company's still active roll-up strategy.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation for the company's
financial metrics to remain in line with parameters for the Ba3
rating.  More specifically, the outlook assumes that management
will keep upcycle leverage from trending towards the 2.5x range
considering the company's still comparatively smaller scale,
Moody's current outlook for the sector, and the continued
aggressive growth strategy.  The outlook also assumes that
management has not altered its acquisition funding strategy and
that any additional large acquisitions will be financed with a
more balanced mix of debt and equity than the JetStar acquisition.

Positive ratings momentum would depend on the company increasing
its size and diversification through a significant large
acquisition that is largely equity funded and is viewed to enhance
the company's scale and geographic diversification, especially if
it tied more to the production side of services versus drilling.  
The outlook or ratings could be pressured if management alters its
conservative financial policies and financial metrics
significantly deteriorate including debt/EBITDA trending close to
2.5x in the upcycle or if the company executes large debt financed
acquisitions or a debt financed dividend or stock buyback program.

Basic Energy Services is headquartered in Midland, Texas.


BDO SEIDMAN: Gets Sued by Banco Espirito for $170 Million
---------------------------------------------------------
Banco Espirito Santo International has filed a $170 million civil
lawsuit against BDO Seidman LLP in Miami-Dade Circuit Court for
negligence and dishonesty, reports said.   Banco Espirito alleges
that BDO Seidman failed to detect fraud in the defunct E.S.
Bankest LLC that ultimately led to Bankest's collapse.

BDO Seidman has maintained that it was not negligent in its audits
of E.S. Bankest and has counter sued Banco Espirito.  

Bankest was created in 1998 by the partnership of Banco Espirito
and Bankest Capital Corp. as a factoring firm that buys at a
discount accounts receivable of other companies.

Banco Espirito said that it entered into partnership with Bankest
Capital because BDO Seidman's audits from 1995 to 1996 showed high
income, Steven Thomas, Esq., representing Banco Espirito told
jurors this month in an opening statement, Curt Anderson of the
Associated Press reported.

Mr. Thomas added that BDO Seidman missed a red flag when it mailed
145 letters in one year to companies listed as owners of Bankest
money, and it received no replies, Mr. Anderson further said.

According to reports, Bankest management and Banco Espirito
executives were the ones who provided false financial documents
and fictitious invoices to accountants of BDO Seidman, Adam Cole,
Esq., representing BDO Seidman countered.

Mr. Cole told jurors that Banco Espirito was having financial
problems in the 90s that led them to the Bankest partnership
expecting an increase in income, Mr. Anderson added.

Banco Espirito's lawsuit compared BDO Seidman's role in Bankest as
that of defunct accounting firm Arthur Anderson's role in Enron's
case.  The Honorable Jose Rodriguez, however, prohibited any
mention of Enron in the trial proper calling it prejudicial,
Patrick Danner of Miami Herald reported.

BDO Seidman said that a verdict against it could threaten its
standing as the world's fifth-largest accounting firm and could
mean loss of jobs to thousands of its accountants, auditors, and
staff, Mr. Danner added.

                    About Banco Espirito Santo

Banco Espirito Santo was founded in Portugal in 1920.  It expanded
its operations to Brazil.

                       About BDO Seidman LLP

BDO Seidman LLP is a national professional services firm providing
assurance, tax, financial advisory and consulting services to a
wide range of publicly traded and privately held companies. Guided
by core values of integrity, trust, professionalism, independence
and service for almost 100 years, the firm has provided quality
service and leadership through the active involvement of our most
experienced and committed professionals.

BDO Seidman serves clients through 34 offices and more than 300
independent alliance firm locations nationwide.  As a Member Firm
of BDO International, BDO Seidman LLP serves multi-national
clients by leveraging a global network of resources comprised of
601 Member Firm offices in 105 countries.  BDO International is a
worldwide network of public accounting firms, called BDO Member
Firms, serving international clients.  Each BDO Member Firm is an
independent legal entity in its own country.


BOCA CIEGA: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------
Debtor: Boca Ciega Corporation
        P.O. Box 86128
        Madeira Beach, FL 33738

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-00524

Type of Business:

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 23, 2007

Court: Middle District of Florida (Tampa)

Judge: Catherine Peek McEwen

Debtor's Counsel: Michael C Markham, Esq.
                  Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns LLP
                  P.O. Box 1368
                  Clearwater, FL 33757
                  Tel: (727) 461-1818
                  Fax: (727) 443-6548

Estimated Assets: $1 Million to $10 Million

Estimated Debts:  $1 Million to $10 Million

The Debtor did not file a list of its 20 Largest Unsecured
Creditors.


BURLINGTON COAT: Poor Performance Prompts S&P's Negative Outlook
----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services changed the ratings outlook on
Burlington Coat Factory to negative from stable.  

At the same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed the company's
ratings, including the 'B' corporate credit rating and the bank
loan ratings.

"We believe Burlington Coat Factory's recent poor same-store sales
performance will result in lower-than-expected margins, and credit
measures that will not meet expectations," said
Standard & Poor's credit analyst David Kuntz.

Ratings for the Burlington, NJ-based Burlington Coat Factory
reflect the company's participation in the highly competitive and
economically vulnerable off-price apparel and home goods industry,
substantial seasonality and exposure to macroeconomic trends, high
leverage, and thin cash flow protection measures.

Although BCF has a good history of operating results, sales have
recently weakened due to warm weather.  The late arrival of cold
weather may continue to be a negative factor in the company's
third quarter 2007.

"With little time available before spring merchandise arrives, it
will be difficult for BCF to make up the ground it lost over the
past few months," added Mr. Kuntz.


CALPINE CORP: Harbinger Submits $100 Million Alternative Offer
--------------------------------------------------------------
Harbinger Capital Partners has submitted an offer to Ernst & Young
Inc., in its capacity as the court-appointed monitor in the
Canadian insolvency proceedings, for all of the Class B
subordinated units of Calpine Power, L.P. and various management
agreements among affiliates of each of Calpine Corporation and
Calpine Power Income Fund.

The offer, which is subject only to the receipt of all regulatory
approvals and an order of the Court in acceptable form and
definitive documentation, provides for HCP Acquisition Inc. to
acquire all of the Class B Units (including all rights and
entitlements accruing to the Class B Units in relation to claims
by CLP) and the Management Agreements for an aggregate purchase
price equal to the greater of: (a) $100 million; and (b) the
Fund's proposed price plus $2 million.

The offer is not conditional on HCP Acquisition's take-over bid
for all the outstanding units of the Fund being successful.  
However, if the bid is successful and HCP acquires all of the
units of the Fund, it will pay CCPL an additional $20 million and
will enter into or otherwise affirm the Settlement Agreement
proposed by the Fund, provided that HCP Acquisition is satisfied
with its terms, acting reasonably.  In this manner, to the extent
the bid is successful, the Monitor will have materially increased
the consideration received for these assets. Unlike the Fund's
settlement agreement, Harbinger's offer in no way precludes the
Monitor from soliciting or otherwise initiating or encouraging
alternative offers or proposals that might bring greater value to
CCPL in the insolvency proceedings.

"We and various other creditors involved in the Calpine CCAA
proceedings were discouraged that the Monitor would have entered
into the settlement agreement without tendering these assets for
auction," stated Howard Kagan, a managing director of Harbinger
Capital Partners.  "The Monitor knew or ought to have reasonably
known that these assets were of interest to Harbinger and other
parties."

"The Fund's very recent and expedited efforts to acquire the Class
B Units and settle matters with its manager appear to have been
taken in response to our take-over bid," continued Mr. Kagan.  
"However, the Trustees' efforts to keep all details of their
proposed deal confidential until after approved by the Court makes
one question the motives of the Trustees.  It is difficult to know
whether this deal, once the details are made public to
unitholders, would be such as to cause Harbinger to amend or
withdraw its offer for the Trust."

Harbinger's offer in relation to the Class B Units and Management
Agreements is open for acceptance until 4:00 p.m. (Calgary time)
on Feb. 16, 2007, unless accepted by the Monitor or extended or
terminated in writing by Harbinger.

                About Calpine Power Income Fund

Calpine Power Income Fund (Toronto Stock Exchange: CF.UN) --
http://www.calpinepif.com/-- is an unincorporated open-ended    
trust that invests in electrical power assets.  The Fund
indirectly owns interests in power generating facilities in
British Columbia, Alberta and California.  In addition, the Fund
owns a participating loan interest in a power plant in Ontario and
has made a loan to Calpine Canada Power Ltd.  The Fund is managed
by Calpine Canada Power Ltd., which is headquartered in Calgary,
Alberta.  The Fund has 61,742,288 Trust Units outstanding.

                      About Calpine Corp.

Headquartered in San Jose, California, Calpine Corporation
(OTC Pink Sheets: CPNLQ) -- http://www.calpine.com/-- supplies
customers and communities with electricity from clean, efficient,
natural gas-fired and geothermal power plants.  Calpine owns,
leases and operates integrated systems of plants in 21 U.S. states
and in three Canadian provinces.  Its customized products and
services include wholesale and retail electricity, gas turbine
components and services, energy management and a wide range of
power plant engineering, construction and maintenance and
operational services.

The company previously produced a portion of its fuel consumption
requirements from its own natural gas reserves.  However, in July
2005, the company sold substantially all of its remaining domestic
oil and gas assets to Rosetta Resources Inc.

The company filed for chapter 11 protection on Dec. 20, 2005
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 05-60200).  Richard M. Cieri, Esq.,
Matthew A. Cantor, Esq., Edward Sassower, Esq., and Robert G.
Burns, Esq., Kirkland & Ellis LLP represent the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts.  Michael S. Stamer, Esq., at Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, represents the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors.  As of Dec. 19, 2005, the Debtors listed
$26,628,755,663 in total assets and $22,535,577,121 in total
liabilities.


CANAL CAPITAL: Todman & Company Raises Going Concern Doubt
----------------------------------------------------------
Todman & Co., in New York, expressed substantial doubt about Canal
Capital Corp.'s ability to continue as a going concern after
auditing the company's consolidated financial statements for the
years ended Oct. 31, 2006, and 2005.  The auditing firm cited that
the company has suffered recurring losses from operations and is
obligated to continue making substantial annual contributions to
its defined benefit pension plan.

Canal Capital reported a $322,424 net loss on $4.4 million of real
estate revenues for the year ended Oct. 31, 2006, compared with
$716,166 of net income on $6.5 million of real estate revenues for
the year ended Oct. 31, 2005.  

The company's net loss of $322,424 is due primarily to the
$1.1 million decrease in the gain on sale of real estate, while
the company's fiscal 2005 net income was due primarily to a
$2.5 million increase in sales of real estate which generated  
operating income of $1.3 million.

Revenues in 2006 decreased by $2.1 million to $4.4 million as
compared with 2005 revenues.  The fiscal 2006 decrease in revenues
is due primarily to the $2.2 million decrease in sales of real
estate offset to a certain extent by the $200,000 increase in
revenues from stockyard operations.    

At Oct. 31, 2006, the company's balance sheet showed $5.4 million
in total assets, $3.7 million in total liabilities, and
$1.7 million in total stockholders' equity.

Full-text copies of the company's consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Oct. 31, 2006, are available for
free at  http://researcharchives.com/t/s?190c

                       About Canal Capital

Headquartered in Hauppauge, New York, Canal Capital Corporation
(OTC: COWP) is engaged in two distinct businesses --
stockyard and real estate operations.

Canal's real estate properties are located in Sioux City, Iowa,
South St Paul, Minnesota, St Joseph, Missouri, Omaha, Nebraska and
Sioux Falls, South Dakota.  The properties consist, for the most
part, of a commercial office space, land and structures leased to
third parties as well as vacant land available for development or
resale.  

Canal also operates two central public stockyards located in St.
Joseph, Missouri and Sioux Falls, South Dakota.


CAPITAL AUTO: Fitch Upgrades Rating on Series 2006-1 Class D Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings upgrades the outstanding classes B, C and D notes
and affirms the class A notes of the Capital Auto Receivables
Asset Trust 2006-1 asset-backed notes transaction:

   -- 2006-1 class A affirmed at 'AAA';
   -- 2006-1 class B upgraded to 'AA' from 'A';
   -- 2006-1 class C upgraded to 'A' from 'BBB'; and,
   -- 2006-1 class D upgraded to 'BBB' from 'BB'.

The rating upgrade is a result of increased available credit
enhancement.  The collateral continues to perform within Fitch's
expectations and, under the credit enhancement structure, the
securities can now withstand stress scenarios consistent with the
upgraded ratings and still make full payments to investors in
accordance with the terms of the documents.

As before, the ratings reflect the quality of General Motors
Acceptance Corporation's retail auto loan originations, the
strength of its servicing capabilities, and the sound financial
and legal structure of the transaction, and the strength of the
servicing provided by General Motors Acceptance Corporation.


CEP HOLDING: Has Until April 18 to Make Lease Related Decisions
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Marilyn Shea-Stonun of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Ohio extended, until April 18, 2007, the
period within which CEP Holdings LLC and its debtor-affiliates
can elect to assume or reject unexpired non-residential real
property leases.

The Debtor's explain to the Court that the unexpired leases remain
in effect and have not expired according their respective terms.  
The Debtors point out that these unexpired leases are subject to
assumption or rejection under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

                       About CEP Holdings

Based in Akron, Ohio, CEP Holdings, LLC, manufactured hard, molded
rubber products and extruded plastic materials for companies in
the automotive, construction, and the medical industries.  The
Company and two of its subsidiaries filed for chapter 11
protection on Sept. 20, 2006 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 06-61796).  
McGuireWoods LLP represents the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors.  When the Debtors filed for protection from their
creditors, they estimated assets and debts between $10 million and  
$50 million.


CHARTWELL SENIORS: Board Restructures Senior Management Team
------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Trustees of Chartwell Seniors Housing Real Estate
Investment Trust has re-defined specific roles for its senior
management team to reflect the evolution of Chartwell's business,
its significant growth, and the considerable opportunities being
evaluated for future expansion.

Effective immediately, Mr. Stephen Suske has been appointed Vice
Chair and Co-Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Robert Ezer has been
appointed President and Co-Chief Executive Officer.  Both
executives will be responsible for the strategic direction of the
REIT reporting directly to the Board of Trustees.  In addition,
Mr. Suske will be responsible for all on-going operations of the
REIT, while Mr. Ezer will oversee all investment activities and
the continued growth of the REIT.

In addition, Mr. Cam Crawford has been appointed Chief Operating
Officer responsible for the management of EBITDA and general and
administrative expenses and will oversee all North American
retirement communities, including operations, acquisitions,
internal growth and mezzanine loan activities for the company and
Mr. Richard Noonan has been appointed Chief Operating Officer,
Canadian Retirement Communities.

"The restructuring of our senior management team more clearly
defines specific responsibilities to ensure that our growth is
reflected in enhanced value for our Unitholders," Mr. Suske
stated.

"The North American seniors housing business remains highly
fragmented, and with these changes we are confident our track
record of accretive growth will continue," Mr. Ezer added.

                    About Chartwell Seniors

Chartwell Seniors Housing Real Estate Investment Trust
(TSX:CSH.UN) -- http://www.chartwellreit.ca/-- is a growth-
oriented investment trust owning and managing a complete spectrum
of seniors communities.  It is currently the largest participant
in the Canadian seniors housing business with a growing presence
in the United States.  The company capitalizes on the strong
demographic trends present in its markets to grow internally and
through accretive acquisitions.  The company also has an exclusive
option to purchase stabilized communities from Spectrum Seniors
Housing Development L.P., a growing seniors housing development
company.

Chartwell's Distribution Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) allows
Unitholders to have their monthly cash distributions used to
purchase Trust Units without incurring commission or brokerage
fees, and receive bonus Units equal to 3% of their monthly cash
distributions.

                         *     *     *

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on Oct. 26, 2006,
Dominion Bond Rating Service confirmed the ratings of Chartwell
Seniors Housing REIT at BB and STA-4 (high), following Chartwell's
announcements of acquisition and investment activity totaling $850
million, or approximately $715 million reflecting Chartwell's
share.


CHASEFLEX TRUST: Fitch Puts Low-B Ratings on $4.27 Million Certs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ChaseFlex Trust, series 2007-1, is rated by Fitch:

   -- $424,138,296 classes 1-A1 through 1-A3, 2-A1 through 2-A13,
      A-X, A-P, and A-R 'AAA';

   -- $11,700,300 class M 'AA';

   -- $4,725,200 class B-1 'A';

   -- $3,600,100 class B-2 'BBB';

   -- $2,250,000 privately offered B-3 'BB'; and,

   -- $2,025,100 privately offered B-4 'B'.

The 'AAA' rating on the senior classes reflects the 5.75%
subordination provided by the 2.60% class M, 1.05% class B-1,
0.80% class B-2, 0.50% privately offered class B-3, 0.45%
privately offered class B-4 and 0.35% privately offered and not
rated class B-5 certificates.

Fitch believes the above credit enhancement will be adequate to
support mortgagor defaults as well as bankruptcy, fraud and
special hazard losses in limited amounts.

In addition, the ratings also reflect the quality of the
underlying mortgage collateral, strength of the legal and
financial structures, and the primary servicing capabilities of
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

This transaction contains certain classes designated as
exchangeable certificates and others as regular certificates.
Class 2-A13 is an exchangeable certificate.  Classes 1-A1 through
1-A3, 2-A1 through 2-A12, A-X, A-P, A-R, M and B-1 through B-5 are
regular certificates.

The holder of the Exchangeable Initial Certificates in any
Exchangeable Combination may exchange all or part of each class of
such Exchangeable Initial Certificates for a proportionate
interest in the related Exchangeable Certificates.  The holder of
any class of Exchangeable Certificates may exchange all or part of
such class for a proportionate interest in each such class of
Exchangeable Initial Certificates or for other Exchangeable
Certificates in the related Exchangeable Combination.

The classes of Exchangeable Initial Certificates and Exchangeable
Certificates that are outstanding on any date and the outstanding
principal balances of any such classes will depend upon the
aggregate distributions of principal made to such classes, as well
as any exchanges that may have occurred on or prior to such date.  
For the purposes of the exchanges and the calculation of the
principal balance of any class of Exchangeable Initial
Certificates, to the extent that exchanges of Exchangeable Initial
Certificates for Exchangeable Certificates occur, the aggregate
principal balance of the Exchangeable Initial Certificates will be
deemed to include the principal balance of such Exchangeable
Certificates issued in the exchange, and the principal balance of
such Exchangeable Certificates will be deemed to be zero.  
Exchangeable Initial Certificates in any Exchangeable Combination
and the related Exchangeable Certificates may be exchanged only in
the specified proportion that the original principal balances of
such certificates bear to one another.

Any holders of Exchangeable Certificates will be the beneficial
owners of an interest in the Exchangeable Initial Certificates in
the related Exchangeable Combination and will receive a
proportionate share, in the aggregate, of the aggregate
distributions on those certificates.  

With respect to any Distribution Date, the aggregate amount of
principal and interest distributable to any classes of
Exchangeable Certificates and the Exchangeable Initial
Certificates in the related Exchangeable Combination then
outstanding on such Distribution Date will be equal to the
aggregate amount of principal and interest otherwise distributable
to all of the Exchangeable Initial Certificates in the related
Exchangeable Combination on such Distribution Date as if no
Exchangeable Certificates were then outstanding.

The trust consists of 1,159 first-lien residential mortgage loans
with stated maturity of not more than 30 years with an aggregate
principal balance of $450,014,110 as of the cut-off date,
Jan. 1, 2007.  The mortgage pool has a weighted average original
loan-to-value ratio of 70.10% with a weighted average mortgage
rate of 7.078%.  The weighted-average FICO score of the loans is
710.  The average loan balance is $388,278 and the loans are
primarily concentrated in California, Florida, and New York.

None of the mortgage loans are 'high cost' loans as defined under
any local, state or federal laws.

The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A will serve as trustee.
Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation, a special purpose corporation,
deposited the loans in the trust which issued the certificates.  
For federal income tax purposes, an election will be made to treat
the trust fund as one or more real estate mortgage investment
conduits.


COOPER COS: Discloses Proposed $1 Billion Refinancing
-----------------------------------------------------
The Cooper Companies Inc. disclosed a proposed refinancing which
includes a $650 million revolving credit facility and a private
offering of $350 million aggregate principal amount of senior
notes due 2015.

The company intends to use borrowings under the new revolving
credit facility and the net proceeds of the notes offering to
repay in full its $250 million term loan and all outstanding
borrowings under its existing $750 million syndicated bank credit
facility, which will be terminated.  The new revolving credit
facility will be unsecured and will include customary guarantees
from domestic subsidiaries and negative pledges on assets.

The exact terms and timing of the new financing will depend on
market conditions and other factors.

The company's proposed new financing is designed to lock in long-
term capital with attractive pricing; provide enhanced strategic
and operational flexibility with fewer and less restrictive
covenants; generate greater borrowing capacity with lower pricing
and lower fees and eliminate existing debt amortization.

"This new financing is intended to serve our financing needs for
the foreseeable future" Commenting on the proposed transactions,
Steven M. Neil, Cooper's Chief Financial Officer said.  "We are
pleased to be working with a bank syndicate that recognizes our
improving financial position, our favorable operational outlook
and the significant progress we have made integrating Ocular
Sciences into CooperVision."

                     About Cooper Companies

The Cooper Companies, Inc. (NYSE:COO)
-- http://www.coopercos.com/-- manufactures and markets specialty  
healthcare products through  its CooperVision and CooperSurgical
units. Corporate offices are in Lake Forest and Pleasanton, Calif.

CooperVision -- http://www.coopervision.com/-- manufactures and   
markets contact lenses and ophthalmic surgery products.
Headquartered in Lake Forest, Calif., it manufactures in
Albuquerque, N.M., Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico, Norfolk, Va.,
Rochester, N.Y., Adelaide, Australia, Hamble and Hampshire
England, Ligny-en-Barrios, France, Madrid, Spain and Toronto.

CooperSurgical -- http://www.coopersurgical.com/-- manufactures   
and markets diagnostic products, surgical instruments and
accessories to the women's healthcare market. With headquarters
and manufacturing facilities in Trumbull, Conn., it also
manufactures in Pasadena, Calif., North Normandy, Ill., Fort
Atkinson, Wis., Montreal and Berlin.

Proclear(R) and Biomedics(R) are registered trademarks and
Biomedics XC(TM) and Biofinity(TM) are trademarks of The Cooper
Companies, Inc., and its subsidiaries or affiliates.

                        *     *     *

As reported in Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 24, 2007,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its corporate credit
rating on Lake Forest, California-based Cooper Companies Inc.
to 'BB-' from 'BB'.


COPELANDS' ENTERPRISES: Selects Glenn Burdette as Accountants
-------------------------------------------------------------
Copelands' Enterprises Inc. seeks authority from the Hon. Mary F.
Walrath of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
to employ Glenn, Burdette, Phillips and Bryson as tax and audit
accountants, nunc pro tunc to Aug. 14, 2006.

The Debtor expects Glenn Burdette to:

   a) prepare tax returns for the fiscal year ended Jan. 31, 2007;
   b) assist in the Internal Revenue Service audit; and
   c) assist in the 401(k) and health plan auditing.

The Debtor has agreed to compensate the firm's professionals at
these hourly rates:

   Professional             Position                  Hourly Rate
   ------------             --------                  -----------
   R. Lance Cowart, CPA     Director                      $230
   Janet C. Jensen, CPA     Manager - Taxation            $180
   Mical W. Bovee           Staff Accountant              $110
   Kathy Burkhart           Admin Asst II                  $55
   Heather R. Pope          Admin. Asst                    $70
   Celeste A. Gray          Supervising Sr. Accountant    $150
   Jennie L. Hackett        Admin. Asst                    $70
   Suzanne Atkinson         Manager - Client
                               Accounting Services        $125

To the best of the Debtor's knowledge, the firm does not hold any
interest adverse to the Debtor and is a "disintersted person" as
that term is defined in Sec. 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Court will convene a hearing at 2:00 p.m. on Feb. 5, 2007, to
consider the Debtor's request.  Objections to the motion are due
on Jan. 29, 2007.

Based in San Luis Obispo, California, Copelands' Enterprises Inc.
dba Copelands' Sports -- http://www.copelandsports.com/--    
operates specialty sporting goods stores.  The company filed for
chapter 11 protection on Aug. 14, 2006 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
06-10853).  James E. O'Neill, Esq., and Laura Davis Jones, Esq.,
at Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young, Jones, & Weintraub LLP, in Los
Angeles, California, represent the Debtor.  Adam G. Landis, Esq.,
at Landis Rath & Cobb LLP represents the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors.  Clear Thinking Group serves as the Debtor's
financial advisor.  When the Debtor filed for protection from its
creditors, it estimated assets and debts between $50 million and
$100 million.


CORPORATE CONNECTION: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsec. Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Corporate Connection Lines, Inc.
        aka Sovereign Coach & Tours
        4160 Ravenswood Road
        Dania, FL 33312

Bankruptcy Case No.: 07-10344

Type of Business: The Debtor provides luxury transportation for
                  individuals and businesses locally in South
                  Florida and nationwide in the U.S.A. and Canada.
                  See http://corporateconnectionlines.com/


Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 19, 2007

Court: Southern District of Florida (Fort Lauderdale)

Judge: John K. Olson

Debtor's Counsel: Brian S Behar, Esq.
                  Behar, Gutt & Glazer, P.A.
                  2999 Northeast 191 Street, 5th Floor
                  Aventura, FL 33180
                  Tel: (305) 931-3771

Estimated Assets: Not Stated

Estimated Debts:  $1 Million to $100 Million

Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                                           Claim Amount
   ------                                           ------------
   Bosque Leasing LP                                    $304,680
   P.O. Box 8216
   Waco, TX 76714

   Bosque Leasing LP                                    $228,082
   P.O. Box 8216
   Waco, TX 76714

   American Express                                     $190,000
   P.O. Box 5207
   Fort Lauderdale, FL 33310

   BMW financial Services                               $160,000

   Internal Revenue Service                             $160,000

   Bosque Leasing LP                                    $131,323

   Bosque Leasing LP                                    $123,349

   Ravenswood Enterprise, Inc.                           $91,325

   USA Financial Services, LLC                           $75,870

   ABC Financial Services                                $70,550

   Crossroads General Agency                             $56,157

   GE Capital                                            $48,483

   Scott C. Long Professional Association                $42,000

   Port of Miami                                         $37,112

   Aequicap                                              $37,112

   Coach Financial Services                              $35,000

   New World Lease Funding                               $30,000

   Nesenoff & Millenberg, LLP                            $22,000

   Platinum Plus for Business                            $21,000

   Highway Charter Bus Service                           $16,000


DELPHI CORP: Court Lifts Stay Letting Cadence Pursue Patent Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Robert D. Drain of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York modifies the automatic stay to allow
Cadence Innovation LLC to proceed with the Patent Litigation for
the sole purpose of liquidating the Cadence Claims.

Judge Drain directs Delphi Corp. and its debtor-affiliates and
Cadence to select a mediator and complete a mediation of the
Patent Litigation no later than March 24, 2007.

For reasons stated in open Court, Judge Drain denies Cadence'
request for allowance and payment of the Cadence Postpetition
Claim, without prejudice.

                         Debtors Objection

John Wm. Butler, Jr., Esq., at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, in Chicago, Illinois, argued that the Court should deny
Cadence Innovation LLC's Lift Stay Motion for these reasons:

   -- It would be a waste of the Court's resources to adjudicate
      the Motion as Cadence's Claim is still disputed and
      unliquidated and is likely to remain so for at least a
      year;

   -- To properly defend their estates against Cadence's Claim at
      trial, the Debtors would need to allocate resources that
      are otherwise being used in their restructuring efforts and
      claims resolution process;

   -- The Lift Stay Motion reveals no change in circumstances
      other than Cadence's desire to have its Claim determined
      ahead of other creditors, at a time and in a forum of its
      choosing;

   -- If Cadence' request is granted, other parties with general
      unsecured litigation claims may seek similar relief,
      forcing the Debtors to defend against numerous motions to
      modify the automatic stay; and

   -- Even if Cadence prevails in the Patent Litigation, there
      would be no insurance proceeds available with which to pay
      it.

                        Cadence's Response

Cadence sought relief from the automatic stay so that it may
obtain a judgment and a determination as to whether the Debtors
are actively infringing on its Patents, and not to "jump in
front" of other creditors or to enforce its judgment, Dennis J.
Connolly, Esq., at Alston & Bird LLP, in Atlanta, Georgia,
explained.

Contrary to the Debtors' present position, the automatic stay is
not intended to provide a permanent shield against all
litigation, Mr. Connolly pointed out.  Furthermore, the Debtors
have not offered any proof to support their position that
granting relief to Cadence will negatively impact their efforts
to reorganize or negatively impact creditors, Mr. Connolly
averred.

Mr. Connolly argued Cadence' request is warranted on these
grounds:

   -- The automatic stay cannot be used to facilitate the
      Debtors' continuing violation of Cadence's federally
      protected rights in the Patents;

   -- The Debtors' creditors are being harmed by allowing the
      Debtors to continue manufacturing infringing airbag covers
      since for each of those airbags, Cadence is entitled to a
      postpetition administrative priority claim that must be
      paid in full and in cash prior to the Debtors' exit from
      bankruptcy;

   -- The Debtors have argued that determining the cost
      associated with their bankruptcy estates is crucial to the
      formulation and confirmation of a plan of reorganization;
      thus, liquidating the Action is crucial to the Debtors'
      estates;

   -- As federal patent laws grant Cadence the exclusive right to
      manufacture products based on the Patents for an exclusive
      period of time, Cadence will be substantially prejudiced if
      the Debtors are allowed to continue manufacturing
      infringing airbag covers;

   -- To the extent Cadence obtains a favorable determination in
      the Patent Litigation, Cadence will return to the
      Bankruptcy Court so that its judgment may be properly
      administered in the context of the Debtors' cases; and

   -- To the extent the Cadence Claims remain unliquidated, the
      Debtors will continue their efforts to impermissibly limit
      Cadence's ability to obtain full relief.

Mr. Connolly noted that the Patents will expire in 2010, 2012, and
2012.

"Without this Court's recognition that Cadence is entitled to an
allowed, albeit unliquidated, claim against the Debtors'
bankruptcy estates, Cadence will be unable to preserve the rights
conferred by Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code," Mr. Connolly
contended.  "In addition, because Cadence's administrative
priority claim arises out of the Debtors' intentional violation
of Cadence's federally protected patent rights, the Debtors
should be required to pay Cadence immediately upon liquidation of
the Cadence Claims."

Troy, Mich.-based Delphi Corporation (OTC: DPHIQ) --
http://www.delphi.com/-- is the single largest global supplier of  
vehicle electronics, transportation components, integrated systems
and modules, and other electronic technology.  The Company's
technology and products are present in more than 75 million
vehicles on the road worldwide.  The Company filed for chapter 11
protection on Oct. 8, 2005 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
05-44481).  John Wm. Butler Jr., Esq., John K. Lyons, Esq., and
Ron E. Meisler, Esq., at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
represent the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Robert J.
Rosenberg, Esq., Mitchell A. Seider, Esq., and Mark A. Broude,
Esq., at Latham & Watkins LLP, represents the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.  As of Aug. 31, 2005, the Debtors' balance
sheet showed $17,098,734,530 in total assets and $22,166,280,476
in total debts.  (Delphi Corporation Bankruptcy News,
Issue No. 55; Bankruptcy Creditors' Service Inc.,
http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/or 215/945-7000).


DELPHI CORP: Two Panels Want to File Discovery Motion Under Seal
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and the Official
Committee of Equity Security Holders seek permission from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to file
under seal a joint expedited motion to compel documents and
testimony improperly withheld as privileged, pursuant to Section
107(b)