/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/010115.MBX
         T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R
              Monday, January 15, 2001, Vol. 5, No. 10
                             Headlines
AMERICAN HOMESTAR: Files for Chapter 11 Protection in Texas
AMERICAN HOMESTAR: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
AMERICAN HOMESTAR: Nasdaq Halts Trading Pending More Information 
ARMSTRONG: Employs Richards Layton as Local Counsel
AUDIOHIGHWAY.COM: Files for Chapter 11 Protection in San Jose
BROADBAND WIRELESS: Receiver Fires President & CEO Ivan Webb
COMMERCIAL CAPITAL: Fitch Lifts Watch on Series 3 Mortgage Bonds
CONSTELLATION FINANCE: Fitch Puts Airline Notes on Rating Watch 
DARWIN NETWORKS: Case Summary and 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
DELTA AIR: American/TWA Deal Prompts Moody's to Revise Outlook 
DESIGN HOUSE: DHI Acquisition Completes Asset Purchase
EXIDE CORP: Moody's Reviewing Ratings for Possible Downgrade
FOXMEYER: Avatex to Wire $6 Million Settlement Payment to Trustee 
HARNISCHFEGER: Litigation Heats-Up Over Gelco Lease Claims
HOLLYWOOD VIDEO: May Face Bankruptcy
ICG COMMUNICATIONS: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
LERNOUT & HAUSPIE: Pays Shipping, Warehouse and Customs Charges
LIDS CORPORATION: Wells Fargo Extends $25 Million DIP Financing
LOEWEN: Selling 4 Funeral Homes & 2 Cemeteries for $1 Million
LTV CORPORATION: Threatens Shut Down if Lenders Don't Cooperate
OSAGE SYSTEMS: Inks Deal to Sell Assets to Pomeroy Computer
OWENS-CORNING: Bonded Judgment Creditor Seeks Relief from Stay
PILLOWTEX: Establishes Interim Professional Compensation Protocol
SAFETY-KLEEN: Ryder Moves for Assumption of 287 Truck Leases 
STROUDS INC: Appoints Tom Paccioretti as President and CEO
SUN HEALTHCARE: Stipulation Allows Insured Claim To Proceed 
TEARDROP GOLF: Bids for Assets to Begin at $18.6 Million
TWA: Fitch Says Filing May Impact Aircraft Lease Securitizations
USA BIOMASS: Delisted from Nasdaq Smallcap Market
VENCOR: Proposes 16th Amendment to DIP Credit Agreement
VLASIC FOODS: May Sell Pickle Business to H.J. Heinz Co. 
WASTE SYSTEMS: Files for Chapter 11 Reorganization
WASTE SYSTEMS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH: Noteholders' Tap Hahn Loeser as Local Counsel
WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP: Fusient Buys Money-Losing Wrestling Business
ZENITH ELECTRONICS: TMA Honors Successful Turnaround Team
* Bond pricing for the week of January 16, 2001
                             *********
AMERICAN HOMESTAR: Files for Chapter 11 Protection in Texas
-----------------------------------------------------------
American Homestar Corporation (NASDAQ/ NMS:HSTR) commenced Chapter 
11 bankruptcy proceedings on behalf of itself and 21 of its 
subsidiary companies. The affected subsidiaries are those engaged 
in retailing, manufacturing and franchising activities. The
bankruptcies were commenced in the United States Bankruptcy Court 
for the Southern District of Texas. Certain of the Company's other 
subsidiaries-those engaged in insurance, financial and 
transportation services - did not commence any proceedings.
The bankruptcy filings were necessitated by a severe and prolonged 
decline in manufactured home sales throughout the manufactured 
housing industry. Industry-wide sales declined approximately 24% 
between 1999 and 2000. At September 30, 2000 (the date of American 
Homestar Corporation's most recent 10-Q), the company reported 
total assets of $363 million and total liabilities of $279 
million. Chapter 11 bankruptcy should allow American Homestar 
Corporation to restructure both its business operations and its 
indebtedness.
The Company anticipates that it will file a plan of reorganization 
by April 30, 2001.
American Homestar Corporation is a vertically integrated 
manufacturer and retailer of manufactured housing which also 
provides transportation and insurance services to its customers.
AMERICAN HOMESTAR: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: American Homestar Corporation
        2450 South Shore Blvd Ste 300
        League City, TX 77573
Type of Business: A vertically integrated manufacturer and 
                  retailer of manufactured housing, which also 
                  provides transportation and insurance services 
                  to its customers.
Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 11, 2001
Court: Southern District of Texas (Galveston)
Bankruptcy Petition No.: 01-80017
Judge: Letitia Z. Clark
Debtor's Counsel: Marvin Isgur, Esq.
                  Floyd Isgur Rios & Wahrich, P.C. 
                  700 Louisiana, Suite 4600
                  Houston, TX 77002
                  Telephone 713-222-1470
                  Fax 713-222-1475 
Total Assets: $363.3 million
Total Liabilities: $278.8 million
List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:
   Creditor                Nature of Claim            Claim Amount
   --------                ---------------            ------------
Massachusetts Mutual Life   Senior Bond Debt           $14,000,000
Insurance Co.
1295 State Street
Springfield, MA 01111
Hare & Co.                  Series A Bond Debt         $12,000,000
Address Unknown
Massachusetts Mutual Life   Series A Bond Debt         $11,250,000
Insurance Co.
1295 State Street
Springfield, MA 01111
Deutsche Financial            Repurchase                  Unknown
Services Corp.                obligation
2625 S Plaza Dr., Ste 201
Tempe, AZ 85282
RiverHills Bank               Repurchase                  Unknown
Tommy Duren                   obligation
P.O. Box 820-868
Vicksburg, MS 39182
Nations Credit Manufactuing   Repurchase                   Unknown
Housing Corporation of        obligation
America
6455 E Johns Crossing, Ste 325
Deluth, GA 30155
ITT Commercial Finance Corp.  Repurchase                   Unknown
n/k/a Deutsche                obligation
Deutsche Financial Services
3225 Cumberland Blvd
Atlanta, GA 30339
Bombardier Capital, Inc.      Repurchase                   Unknown
P.O. Box 991                  obligation
1600 Mountain View Dr.
Colchester, VT 05446-0991
Northwestern Mutual Life     Series A Bond Debt        $10,000,000
Insurance Co.
720 F. Wisconsin Ave
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Northwestern Mutual Life      Senior Bond Debt       
$10,000,000.00
Insurance Co.
720 F. Wisconsin Ave
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Allstate Life Insurance Co.   Senior Bond Debt          $8,500,000
3075 Sanders Rd, Ste G3A
Northbrook, IL 60062-7127
Salkeld & Co.                 Senior Bond Debt          $8,000,000
Address Unknown
Allstate Insurance Company    Senior Bond Debt          $5,000,000
3075 Sanders Rd, Ste G3A
Northbrook, IL 60062-7127
Hare & Co.                    Senior Bond Debt          $5,000,000
Northern Life Insurance Co.   Senior Bond Debt          $4,500,000
c/o Rellastar Investment
Research, Inc.
100 Washington Ave S, Ste 800
Minneapolis, MN 55401-2121
RellaStar Life Insurance Co.    Series A Bond Debt      $4,000,000
c/o Rellastar Investment
Research, Inc.
100 Washington Ave S, Ste 800
Minneapolis, MN 55401-2121
American Bankers Life Assurance  Senior Bond Debt       $4,000,000
Company Inc. of Florida
11222 Quail Roost Dr., 4th Fl.
Miami, FL 33157
Provident Mutual Life            Series A Bond Debt     $3,000,000
Insurance Company
P.O. Box 1717
Valley Forge, PA 19482-1717
Provident Mutual Life            Senior Bond Debt       $3,000,000
Insurance Company
P.O. Box 1717
Valley Forge, PA 19482-1717
Washington Square Advisers       Senior Bond Debt       $2,500,000
Private Placement Trust Fund
c/o Washington Square
Advisers, Inc.
100 Washington Ave S, Ste 700
Minneapolis, MN 55401-2121
AMERICAN HOMESTAR: Nasdaq Halts Trading Pending More Information 
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Nasdaq Stock Market(SM) has changed the trading halt status of 
American Homestar Corporation (Nasdaq: HSTR) to "additional 
information requested." Trading in American Homestar was halted on 
January 11, 2001 at 8:13 a.m., Eastern Time, at a last sale price 
of 7/32. Trading will remain halted until the company has fully 
satisfied Nasdaq's request for additional information.
ARMSTRONG: Employs Richards Layton as Local Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
Armstrong Worldwide Industries and its debtor-affiliates ask the 
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for permission to employ Richards, Layton & 
Finger, P.A., in Wilmington, Delaware, as their local bankruptcy 
counsel in these Chapter 11 cases. Richard Layton will:
   (a) Advise the Debtors of their rights, powers, and duties as 
       debtors and debtors-in-possession;
   (b) Take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the 
       Debtors' estates, including the prosecution of actions on 
       the Debtors' behalves, the defense of any actions commenced 
       against the Debtors, the negotiation of disputes in which 
       the Debtors are involved, and the preparation of objections 
       to claims filed against the Debtors' estates;
   (c) Prepare on behalf of the Debtors, as debtors in possession, 
       all necessary motions, applications, answers, orders, 
       reports, and papers in connection with the administration 
of 
       the Debtors' estates;
   (d) Negotiate and prepare on behalf of the Debtors any plan(s) 
       of reorganization and all related documents; and
   (e) Perform all other necessary legal services in connection
       with these Chapter 11 cases.
Mark D. Collins, Esq., a director of Richards Layton, advises that 
the attorneys and paraprofessionals who will be performing the 
bulk of the work for the Debtors, and their respective hourly 
rates, will be:
              Mark D. Collins          $ 340
              Deborah E. Spivack       $ 250
              John H. Knight           $ 240
              Russell C. Silberglied   $ 235
              Paul N. Heath            $ 180
              Rebecca L. Booth         $ 130
              Diana M. Poole            $ 95
These hourly rates are subject to periodic adjustment to reflect 
economic conditions and other factors. Mr. Collins advises that 
other attorneys and paraprofessionals may be performing services 
for the Debtors from time to time.
Mr. Collins says that he performed a conflict check and, 
accordingly, discloses that AWI is an unsecured creditor in the 
bankruptcy case of Hechinger Investment Company, Inc., and its 
affiliates, in which the debtors are represented by Richards 
Finger. Also, Martin I. Lubaroff, a director of Richards Layton, 
is a director of Wachovia Bank Card Services, an affiliate of 
Wachovia Bank, itself a party in interest in these estates. In no 
event does the firm hold or represent any interest adverse to 
these estates or the Debtors in connection with the services for 
which approval of employment is sought.
Richards Layton received a prepetition payment from the Debtors of 
$125,000. Such monies have been applied to any prepetition amounts 
owing for services rendered and expenses incurred, and any balance 
will be applied as a retainer.
AUDIOHIGHWAY.COM: Files for Chapter 11 Protection in San Jose
-------------------------------------------------------------
Audiohighway.com (Nasdaq: AHWY) has filed a voluntary petition for 
relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. 
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California in San 
Jose, California. Audiohighway.com maintains a small technical and 
operations staff.
In November 2000, audiohighway.com revealed that it was cutting 
back its business operations and laying off a substantial portion 
of its workforce. Due to a dramatic downturn in the financial 
markets and in particular, the market for Internet companies, 
audiohighway.com was unable to attract sufficient additional 
financing to maintain normal operations. After the
reduction in work force, audiohighway.com continued to pursue 
strategic alternatives, but to date none has materialized. 
Therefore, audiohighway.com finds it necessary to seek bankruptcy 
protection.
According to company officials, this action has been taken in an 
effort to protect company assets. The company anticipates it will 
file a plan of reorganization to restructure its debts in the near 
future.
Audiohighway.com is a leading online media destination, offering 
one of the Internet's largest and most diverse libraries of free 
audio content. Visitors can access thousands of hours of music, 
audio books, news, entertainment, education and information from 
audiohighway.com in a number of formats (including MP3, 
RealPlayer(TM) and Windows(R) Media Player(TM)), through a variety 
of audio channels. audiohighway.com offers free audio and
video content, which can be streamed directly to PCs or downloaded 
for future playback.
 
BROADBAND WIRELESS: Receiver Fires President & CEO Ivan Webb
------------------------------------------------------------
Peter B. Bradford, Federally Appointed Temporary Receiver for 
Broadband Wireless International Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: 
BBAN), said that the Board of Directors has terminated Ivan Webb 
as President/CEO of the company effective Thursday, December 28, 
2000, removing any remaining official involvement held by Mr. Webb 
in Broadband Wireless International Corporation.
The Board has also approved several resolutions which impact the
organizational structure and operational preparation of the 
company. Organizational changes include the election of Mr. Albie 
L. Shaffer as Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Dr. Ron 
Tripp as Corporate Secretary and Treasurer. Additionally, the 
Board is very pleased to announce that Mr. Ron D. Harris has 
accepted an offer from the company to assume the position of 
C.O.O., effective January 5, 2001. Mr. Harris has been working 
with the Receivership and the current Board members for several 
months providing business planning analysis and also serving as 
Project Facilitator for the Broadband Wireless Application testing 
in Norman and Edmond, OK. Mr. Harris attended the University of 
Oklahoma, Norman and is a CPA, and has recently served as 
President of ENTEQ Solutions and Inacom Information Systems, both 
successful companies involved in the system integration/ 
information management industry. As C.O.O., Mr. Harris will be 
responsible for overseeing and administering all matters related 
to the company's deployment of Broadband Wireless services in the 
Oklahoma City market.
Finally, the Board has approved moving forward immediately with an
operational business plan which will provide for Broadband 
Wireless services to be offered to business and residential 
customers initially in the Greater Oklahoma City, Norman, and 
Edmond metro areas. The execution of this business plan is one 
component of the strategy to position the company appropriately 
for sustained viability, and should enable the company to have 
customers engaged in the next few months. At the same time, the 
Board is continuing to meet with several companies that have 
expressed an interest in merger or acquisition plans with BBAN; 
these discussions include the continuation of Broadband Wireless 
International Corporation to develop a significant base of 
operation in the Oklahoma City area.
COMMERCIAL CAPITAL: Fitch Lifts Watch on Series 3 Mortgage Bonds
----------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial Capital Access One, Inc.'s commercial mortgage bonds 
series 3, $17.3 million class 3G are removed from Rating Watch 
Negative and is affirmed at 'B'. Fitch also affirms the $60.6 
million class 3A-1, the $200.6 million class 3A-2, and the 
interest-only class 3-X at 'AAA'. The $45.5 million class 3B is 
affirmed at 'AA', the $43.4 million class 3C is affirmed at 'A', 
the $19.5 million class 3D is affirmed at 'BBB', the $6.5 million 
class 3E is affirmed at 'BBB-', and the $10.8 million class 3F
is affirmed at 'BB'. Fitch does not rate the $17.3 million class 
3H. The rating actions follow Fitch's annual review of the 
transaction, which closed in December 1998.
The bonds are collateralized by 108 mortgage loans secured by 112
properties. Low income housing tax credit (LIHTC) multifamily 
properties (39% by principal balance) and office properties (26%) 
constitute the majority of the pool. The properties are located in 
33 different states, with significant concentrations in Texas 
(16%) and North Carolina (11%). No loans have paid off since 
closing. Currently, one loan (1%) is 90-days delinquent and in the 
hands of the special servicer, GMAC Commercial Mortgage ('GMAC'). 
Sun America's limited guaranty on the 38 loans that it originated 
is still intact.
Class 3G was placed on Rating Watch Negative on Dec. 15, 2000 due 
to the delay in the transfer of special servicing responsibilities 
from Dynex Commercial Services ('Dynex') to GMAC. At the time, 
Fitch was concerned with Dynex's ability to properly service the 
transaction in the absence of a standby special servicer. Special 
servicing responsibilities were formally transferred to GMAC on 
Dec. 21, 2000.
Given GMAC's special servicer rating of 'CSS1', Fitch is no longer
concerned, at this time, with the quality of special servicing for 
the transaction.
Because of the recent transfers of servicing responsibilities, in 
particular primary servicing responsibilities from Dynex to GMAC 
(June 27, 2000), very limited operating information was available 
for the properties securing the transaction. As of January 11, 
2001, GMAC was able to provide year-to-date (YTD) operating 
information, through September 2000, for 47% of the properties 
(based on principal balance).
Based on this information, the comparable weighted-average (WA) 
debt-service coverage ratio (DSCR) increased, on an adjusted 
basis, to 1.42 times (x), as of YTD September 2000, compared to 
1.33x, for the trailing-twelve months ended September 1999. Fitch 
considered 11 loans (11%) to be of particular concern, compared to 
9% during the 1999 annual review. The loans of concern had either 
a weak DSCR (<1.0x), or a lack of current information coupled with 
a history of weak DSCRs. Healthcare loans accounted for 53% of the 
loans of concern, while LIHTC properties accounted for the 
balance.
All of the LIHTC loans of concern were covered by the Sun America 
guaranty.
Fitch assumed that the aforementioned 11 loans would default at 
various loss levels. Based on the hypothetical loss analysis, the 
current subordination levels, the limited exposure to delinquent 
loans, and the transfer of special servicing responsibilities to 
GMAC, Fitch removes class 3G from Rating Watch Negative and 
affirms all the ratings. Fitch will continue to monitor this 
transaction.
CONSTELLATION FINANCE: Fitch Puts Airline Notes on Rating Watch 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch places Constellation Finance LLC's 'BB' rated 9.8% airline 
receivable asset-backed notes, series 1997-1 on Rating Watch 
Negative.
Constellation, 99% owned by Trans World Airlines, Inc., is a 
special purpose bankruptcy remote limited liability company 
organized to acquire TWA receivables. While the notes have some 
features of structured debt transactions, Fitch's rating is linked 
to the credit quality of TWA. The notes were issued in December 
1997 and are due to begin their scheduled amortization on Jan. 15, 
2001.
Fitch's rating action reflects TWA's announcement that it is being 
acquired by American Airlines, Inc. and as part of the acquisition 
has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Fitch is currently 
monitoring the developments of this announcement and will take 
additional rating action upon completion of their review process.
 
DARWIN NETWORKS: Case Summary and 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Darwin Networks, Inc.
        13400 Eastpoint Centre Drive
        Louisville, Kentucky 40223
Type of Business: National provider of high speed Internet Access 
                  and data solutions
Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 11, 2001
Court: District of Delaware
Bankruptcy Case No.: 01-00095
Debtor's Counsel: Steven M. Yoder, Esq.
                  The Bayard Firm
                  222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900
                  P.O. Box 25130
                  Wilmington, DE 19899
                  (302) 655-5000
                         and 
                  Latham & Watkins
                  Suite 5800, Sears Tower
                  233 South Wacker Drive
                  Chicago, Illinois 60606
                         and 
                  Wyatt, Tarrant & Comb, LLP
                  2800 Citizen's Plaza
                  Louisville, Kentucky 40202
Total Assets: $122,197,001
Total Debts: $62,814,220
List of the Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:
   Creditor              Nature of Claim           Claim Amount
  ---------              ---------------           ------------
Cisco Systems Capital     Capital Lease             $15,910,826
Jeff Riemenschneider      Obligation
P.O. Box 60000
San Francisco, CA 94160
tel:(773)695-8276
fax:(502)833-1730
NTPC Capital Corporation  Capital Lease             $10,864,746
Don Hansen                Obligation
P.O. Box 642888
Pittsburgh, PA 15264
tel:(404)329-4202
fax:(888)837-1668
Transamerica Business     Capital Lease              $4,370,065
Credit Corporation        Obligation
Darren Miller
P.O. Box 70892
Chicago,IL 60673
tel:(860)409-4542
fax:(860)677-6473
Tut Systems               Trade Debt                 $3,973,138
Ray Calibrese
Corporate Treasurer
5964 W. Las Positas Blvd.
Pleasanton, CA 94588
tel:(925)201-4502
fax:(925)460-3901
Xerox Company             Trade Debt                 $1,606,576
Craig Haskins
P.O. Box 828187
Philadelphia,PA 19182-8187
tel:(205)968-3315
fax:(205)970-4710
AT&T                       Trade Debt                $1,530,764
Tamara Morris, Billing
PO Box 16700
Mesa, AZ 85211
tel:(800)826-5758
fax:(812)246-0401
Interspeed                 Trade Debt                  $800,919
Rajeev Agarwal,CEO
39 High Street
North Andover,MA 01845
tel:(978)688-6164
fax:(978)688-4798
National City Leasing      Capital Lease               $657,415
Corporation                Obligation
David Hudson
Section #680
Louisville, KY 40289-0680
tel:(502)581-7778
Dell Financial Services    Capital Lease               $506,407
Sylvia Morales             Obligation
PO Box 4125 Trade Debt
Carol Stream,IL 60197
tel:(888)660-3355 x48106
Suntech                     Trade Debt                 $502,075
Eric Fitner
844 Livingston Court
Marietta, GA 30067
tel:(770)855-3800
fax:(770)977-5680
BellSouth Communicaton System Trade Debt               $460,712
Claire Metz
PO Box 70807
Charlotte, NC 28272-0807
tel:(540)983-6000
fax:(540)983-6284
WGCS,Inc.                     Trade Debt               $457,275
Jennifer Reeder
PO Box 2259
Wylie,TX 75098
tel:(972)429-1559
fax:(972)429-0952
Torsys Consulting,Inc.        Trade Debt               $445,695
Cliff Freeman
2201 E.El Segundo Blvd.
El Segundo, CA 90245
tel:(310)760-4120
fax:(310)399-5484
Matsco Financial Corp.        Capital Lease            $366,681
Andy Speece                   Obligation
1900 Powell Street,Ste 1150
Emeryville,CA 94608
tel:(510)982-3320
Portal Software Inc.           Trade Debt              $348,752
Leonora Consoli
PO Box 3760
Boston, MA 02241-3760
tel:(408)572-2346
fax:(509)461-4792
PMSI Project Mentors           Trade Debt              $338,733
Tom Meyers
PO Box 420615
Atlanta,GA 30342-0615
tel:(404)459-3333
fax:(404)459-3330
Worldwide Fiber Optics,Inc.    Trade Debt              $305,839
Betsy Becker
3469 Parkway Center Court
Orlando, FL 32808
tel:(407)292-4545
fax:(407)532-7434
Nomadix                        Trade Debt              $266,723
Eric Larson
31355 Agoura Road
Westlake Village, CA 91361
tel:(818)575-2444
fax:(818)597-1502
Henderson Electric             Trade Debt              $241,798
EMS Technologies Wireless      Trade Debt              $213,459
DELTA AIR: American/TWA Deal Prompts Moody's to Revise Outlook 
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investor Service confirmed that it has revised Delta Air
Lines, Inc.'s rating outlook from stable to negative. This is due 
to the growing concern over the potential implications of the 
changes in the U.S. airline industry like the ongoing 
consolidation arrangements.
The rating action took into consideration the company's 
competitive position as a leading US airline, favorable operating 
history, and sound financial condition. But the rating also took 
into account the potential of the latest development in the 
industry to put pressure on the company or urge it to look for 
strategic responses to support its position. Either way, the 
rating outlook recognizes the potential effects the developments 
may have on Delta's Baa3 senior debt rating over the immediate 
term. 
The ratings affected are: all Senior Unsecured ratings: Baa3; the
Commercial Paper rating: Prime-3; the Senior Subordinate rating: 
Ba2; all Equipment Trust ratings: Baa1; all Enhanced Equipment 
Trust ratings: ranging from Aa2 to A3: the Senior Secured Shelf 
rating: Baa1; all IRB ratings: Baa3.
Atlanta, Georgia-based Delta Air Lines, Inc. along with its 
subsidiaries, Atlantic South East Airlines, Inc. and Comair, Inc. 
is the largest US airline in terms of aircraft departures and 
passengers enplaned. It provides air transportation for passengers 
and freight throughout the United States and around the world.
DESIGN HOUSE: DHI Acquisition Completes Asset Purchase
------------------------------------------------------
Executives at Design House have formed a new organization, DHI 
Acquisition Corporation, and have purchased the company. The new 
company, which will continue to operate as Design House, was 
formed by executives Todd Witte, Solomon Malka and Dennis Thums. 
In a deal solidified on Dec. 11, 2000, the group purchased all 
Design House inventory out of receivership, as well as the assets 
and brand names needed to run the company. Serving the home 
improvement industry since 1872, Design House's product lines 
include tub surround manufacturing, residential lighting and 
ceiling fans, bath products, door hardware and various millwork 
items. In addition to its offices in Germantown, Wis., the company 
will maintain Design House's offices in Taipei, Taiwan.
"Design House is a special place for all of us, and we are excited 
to be in a position to turn around the company, which we all 
strongly believe in," said Witte, the company's new president. "We 
appreciate the patience and loyalty shown by our customers, 
suppliers and employees, and we are going to take the necessary 
steps to solidify the future and grow the business."
Witte was formerly senior vice president of sales and marketing at 
Design House. Malka, who was formerly Design House' vice president 
of international operations, will head up the company's 
international operations and merchandising activities. Rounding 
out the executive team is Thums, who will head operations and 
serve as chief financial officer. Thums was formerly vice 
president of operations.
Design House encourages customers to direct any inquiries to the 
customer service team.
Based in Germantown, Wisconsin, Design House Inc. has been a major 
force in the building products and accessory industry for more 
than 125 years. Founded in 1872, the home improvement company 
manufactures and markets specialty millwork products as well as 
decorative bath products, residential lighting, ceiling fans and 
door hardware. The assets of the company were bought by DHI 
Acquisition Corp. on Dec. 11, 2000.
EXIDE CORP: Moody's Reviewing Ratings for Possible Downgrade
------------------------------------------------------------
Exide Corporation's ratings were placed on review by Moody's 
Investor Service for possible downgrade. This is a reaction the 
company's announcement that it has received subpoenas from the 
United State's Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois 
concerning its past relationship with Sears, Roebuck & Co. The 
company, based on discussions with the US Attorney, believes that 
it is likely to be indicted in this criminal case or pay a 
substantial fine. Any settlement could negatively affect the 
company's debt protection measures and be the basis for ratings 
downgrades.
The followings ratings are affected:
   (i) The Ba3 ratings of Exide's $925 million of senior secured 
       bank credit facilities (including a $250 million senior 
       secured revolving credit due 2003; a $150 million senior 
       secured term loan A due 2003; and a $525 million senior 
       secured term loan B due 2005);
  (ii) The B1 rating of Exide's $300 million of 10% senior 
       unsecured notes due 2005;
 (iii) the B3 rating of Exide's $398 million of 2.9% convertible 
       senior subordinated notes due 2005;
  (iv) Exide's Ba3 senior implied rating; and
 
   (v) Exide's B1 senior unsecured issuer rating.
Exide's management has been fully cooperating with the government 
investigation in the hope of expediting the investigation. The 
company is also in litigation with certain members of its former 
management to recover damages concerning the same issues that have 
been the focus of the US Attorney's investigation. The company has 
stopped employing individuals who can be tied to the alleged Sears 
incidents in question.
Exide (d/b/a as Exide Technologies) is a global leader of stored 
electrical energy solutions. Transportation, network and motive 
power batteries are produced for a broad range of uses within the 
industrial and transportation aftermarket and original equipment 
markets. Annual revenues are approximately $3.2 billion.
FOXMEYER: Avatex to Wire $6 Million Settlement Payment to Trustee 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable M. Bruce McCullough Bruce put his stamp of approval 
on a Settlement Agreement among Bart A. Brown, Jr., the chapter 7 
trustee for FoxMeyer Corporation, FoxMeyer Drug Company and their 
debtor-affiliates, and Avatex Corporation. 
Early in FoxMeyer's 1996 bankruptcy saga, the Official Committee 
of Unsecured Creditors filed a lawsuit alleging that a $150 
million pre-petition dividend upstreamed from FoxMeyer to Avatex 
constituted a fraudulent conveyance. Avatex compromised that claim 
with Mr. Brown by delivering a collateralized $8 million 
promissory note to FoxMeyer. This latest settlement further 
compromises that earlier settlement. Under the new settlement, 
Avatex agrees to deliver $6 million by wire transfer to the 
Trustee.
At the January 8 hearing, Mr. Brown's counsel recited to Judge 
McCullough the run-of-the-mill arguments in support of a 
compromise and settlement under Rule 9019 of the Federal Rules of 
Bankruptcy Procedure. Mr. Brown makes the point that collection of 
the Avatex Note might prove to be difficult absent this settlement 
pact because Avatex is in poor financial health and Avatex's 
auditors have expressed doubt about its ability to continue as a 
going concern. 
In an unusual procedural move, David M. Friedman, Esq., at 
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, serving as lead counsel 
to the Chapter 7 Trustee, filed the motion papers requesting 
approval of the Settlement Agreement under seal with the 
Bankruptcy Clerk. Judge McCullough reviewed the settlement pact on 
January 8 and signed an order approving the settlement. Judge 
McCullough has directed that his order not be entered on the 
Court's dockets until January 29, 2001, to allow creditors and 
other parties-in-interest the opportunity to interpose objections. 
HARNISCHFEGER: Litigation Heats-Up Over Gelco Lease Claims 
----------------------------------------------------------
In response to an adversary proceeding initiated by Gelco 
Corporation, d/b/a GE Capital Fleet Services, defendants and 
counterclaimants Harnischfeger Industries, Inc., Beloit 
Corporation, Joy Technologies Inc. and Harnischfeger Corporation 
Inc. object to and request disallowance of claims numbered 10655, 
10656, and 10654 filed by Gelco and scheduled claim numbered 
s4157. The counterclaiming Debtors also seek declaratory relief 
and injunctive relief.
The Counterclaimants tell the Court that the matter is related to 
two Master Agreements between HII and GE Cap:
   (1) a Master Fleet Agreement effective as of October 12, 1995, 
       in which HII is referred to as the Client;
   (2) a Master Lease Agreement effective as of February 10, 1998, 
       in which HII is referred to as the Customer
In connection with the Agreements, GE Cap has filed proofs of 
claim against HII, Beloit, and JTI which, collectively, 
effectively assert that HII, Beloit, and JTI are jointly and 
severally liable to GE Cap under the Master Lease Agreement:
   * Claim (no. 10655) in the amount of $1,214,129.30 against HII
   * Claim (no. 10656) in the amount of $1,214,129.30 against  
     Beloit
   * Claim (no. 10654) in the amount of $1,214,129.30 against JTI
GE Cap has not filed a proof of claim against Harnco, thus 
apparently does not claim that Harnco is jointly and severally 
liable under the Master Lease Agreement. The counterclaimants note 
that GE Cap is barred from asserting any claims against Harnco 
pursuant to the Court's order dated November 30, 1999.
The Counterclaimants tell Judge Walsh that the agreements provide 
that "If more than one party executes [the Agreements as 
Client/Customer], each shall be jointly and severally liable 
hereunder," and because only HII executed the Agreements, Beloit, 
Harnco, and JTI are not liable to GE Cap under either Agreement. 
                Request for Declaratory Relief
(I) Obligation of HII Only
In light of the circumstance, the Counterclaimants request the 
Court to declare that only HII is obligated to GE Cap under the 
Master Agreements and that Beloit, Harnco, and JTI are not jointly 
and severally liable on any claim that has been asserted or may be 
asserted by GE Cap based upon the Master Agreements. Otherwise, 
the claimants say, JTI, Harnco, and Beloit might be wrongfully 
saddled with administrative liabilities under 11 U.S.C. section 
365(d)(lO) or wrongfully required to assume or reject the Master 
Agreements. Moreover, GE Cap's claim on account of alleged 
nonpayment under the Master Agreements might be allowed against 
Beloit and JTI.
(II) Separate and Distinct Leases
In the alternative, the claimants seek declaration that the leases 
are separate and distinct unexpired leases.
The claimants tell the Court that the Master Agreements did not 
provide for the lease of any specific vehicles or for the payment 
of funds for the leasing of vehicles, but rather set forth general 
terms in the event schedules were executed for the leasing of 
vehicles and the payment of funds for the leasing of vehicles. As 
contemplated in the Master Agreements, the claimants relate, HII, 
Beloit, Harnco and JTI each entered into separate agreements with 
GE Cap for the lease of vehicles. The Debtors observe that the 
Master Agreements being necessary to but not sufficient for the 
leases to become effective.
The counterclaimants note that each of them executed independent 
vehicle lease requests and related documents to GE Cap for their 
respective needs, with no knowledge as to the arrangements between 
GE Cap and the other counterclaimants, each autonomously managed 
its arrangements with GE Cap, made termination notices 
Independently and was under obligations unrelated to obligations 
of the other Counterclaimants. 
GE Cap issued invoices to each of them under the respective Lease. 
Each independently paid and accounted for the consideration paid 
and credits received, determined by the number of vehicles each 
chose to lease and the terms of each respective Lease. 
              Objection to the Proofs of Claim
HII, Beloit and JTI object to the claims filed against them 
respectively and request that the claim be disallowed because:
-- The claims are duplicative: claim no. 10656 against Beloit and 
claim  no. 10654 against JTI are each a duplicate of claim no. 
10655 against HII;
-- Each is not liable to GE Cap for any obligations owed to GE by 
any of the other debtors;
-- Each objects to the alleged secured status of GE Cap's claim. 
Specifically, with respect to claim no. 10655 filed against it, 
HII also objects on the grounds that:
   (1) The amount set forth is overstated; 
   (2) Should the Court determine that HII is liable to GE Cap for 
       Beloit's obligations to GE Cap, then, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 
       section 502(d), HII objects to and requests disallowance of 
       GE Cap's claim numbered 10655 on the same grounds set forth 
       by Beloit.
With respect to claim number 10656, Beloit also objects on the 
ground that:
   (1) Beloit has no contractual liability to GE Cap under any of 
       the agreements attached to GE Cap's proof of claim;
   (2) Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 502(d), a creditor's claim 
       against a debtor's estate must be disallowed if the 
       creditor is a transferee of a transfer that is avoidable 
       pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 547 and recoverable under 11 
       U.S.C. section 550; in the present case, GE Cap is the 
       transferee of transfers from Beloit that are avoidable 
       pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 547 and coverable pursuant to 
       11 U.S.C. section 550;
With respect to claim numbered 10654, JTI objects on the ground 
that:
   (1) JTI has no contractual liability to GE Cap under any of the 
       agreements atached to GE Cap's proof of claim;
   (2) Should the Court determine that JTI is liable to GE Cap for 
       Beloit's obligations to GE Cap, then, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 
       section 502(d), JTI objects to and requests disallowance of 
       GE Cap's claim numbered 10654 on the same grounds set forth 
       by Beloit.
With respect to claim numbered s4157 in the amount of $104,732.35 
the counterclaimants object on the grounds that GE Cap has not 
filed a proof of claim against Harnco. Therefore, pursuant to the 
Court's order dated November 30, 1999 governing the filing of 
proofs of claim, GE Cap is barred from asserting any claims 
against Harnco, including, but not limited to, any claims that 
Harnco is jointly and severally liable to GE Cap for any 
obligations owed to GE Cap by any of the other debtors. Harnco 
objects to scheduled claim numbered s4157 on the ground that it 
has no contractual 
liability to GE Cap. 
      Alleged Violations of Automatic Stay By GE Cap
The Debtors draw the Court's attention to provisions under the 
Master Agreements regarding the surrender, sale or disposition, 
and terminal rent adjustment for leased vehicles.
Section 8 of the Master Fleet Agreement:
   * Refund of Rental
If the Net Proceeds exceed the Unamortized Book Value, [GE Cap] 
shall retain an amount equal to the Unamortized Book Value of the 
vehicle sold and client shall receive the excess as a refund of 
rental. 
   * Rental Charge
If the Net Proceeds are less than the Unamortized Book Value of 
the vehicle sold, but equal to or greater than the Guaranteed 
Residual, client shall pay [GE Cap], in cash, as a rental charge 
adjustment, the amount of the difference between the Net Proceeds 
and the Unamortized Book Value.
Section 11 of the Master Lease Agreement:
   * Refund of Rental
If the Net Proceeds exceed the Book Value (as to each Vehicle, its 
Capitalized Cost as defined in the Schedule, reduced by 
appropriate amortization), [GE Cap] shall retain an amount equal 
to the Book Value, and remit the excess to Customer as a refund of 
rental.
   * If the Net Proceeds are less than the Book Value, Customer 
shall pay [GE Cap] the amount of the difference.
The Debtors tell Judge Walsh that these provisions were intended 
to be an incentive to HII, Beloit, Harnco and JTI to maintain 
lease vehicles in good condition. 
Before the Petition Date, the provisions were observed with 
respect to the "refund of rental" of purchased vehicles. If a 
buyer (usually the employee who had been operating the leased 
vehicle) approached Harnco or JTI with a cash bid for the vehicle, 
then Harnco or JTI would contact GE Cap (with no involvement on 
the part of HII) for approval of the bid. In nearly every case 
before the Petition Date, the Book Value of the purchased vehicles 
was $0. Upon approval of the bid and payment by the buyer, and in 
accordance with the terms of the Agreements, GE Cap would credit 
Harnco or JTI with the amount of the purchase price, less certain 
administrative services fees. In cases where a vehicle was 
returned to GE Cap at the end of its lease with no offer from a 
buyer outstanding, it was the practice under the Harnco Lease and 
the JTI Lease for GE Cap to sell the vehicle at auction, and to 
credit Harnco or JTI with the purchase price at auction, less 
certain administrative service fees, the Counterclaimants tell 
Judge Walsh.
However, both before and after the Petition Date, GE Cap 
wrongfully and unilaterally changed the formula for leased vehicle 
purchases, depriving Harnco and JTI of their benefits, the 
counterclaimants allege. 
Specifically, they tell the Court that after the Petition Date, GE 
Cap began calculating the lessee's "refund of rental" by 
subtracting from the purchase price the "blue book" value, a 
figure deemed by GE Cap to reflect the market value of the 
vehicle, resulting in "refund of rental" of $0 typically.
The counterclaimants further accuse that, after the commencement 
of their chapter 11 cases, GE Cap set off pre-petition rental 
payments allegedly owed to them against "refund of rental".
The counterclaimants also complain that because of GE Cap's 
wrongful alteration of the terms of the Leases, Harnco and JIT 
have been forced to continue operating vehicles with excessive 
mileage in order to avoid recording losses. 
Accordingly, the Debtors claim that GE Cap has violated the 
automatic stay thus jeopardizing the ability of HII, Harnco ad JTI 
to successfully reorganize under the Bankruptcy Code.
Based on this, HII, or in the alternative, Harnco and JTI request 
the Court to declare that GE Cap has willfully violated and 
disregarded the automatic stay, enjoin GE Cap from further 
violations of the automatic stay or, put differently, compel GE 
Cap to perform the Master Agreements and to award HII or in the 
alternative, Harnco and JTI actual damages, costs, attorneys' 
fees, and expenses for GE Cap's contractual breaches and willful 
violations of the automatic stay.
In conclusion, the Counterclaimants request that the Court enter 
an order:
   (1) disallowing GE Cap's claim numbered 10656 against Beloit;
   (2) disallowing GE Cap's claim numbered 10654 against JTI;
   (3) disallowing GE Cap's claim numbered 10655 against HII;
   (4) declaring that HII only is obligated to GE Cap for vehicles 
       leased pursuant to the Master Agreements or in the 
       alternative, declaring that the Leases are separate and 
       distinct unexpired leases for all purposes, including, but 
       not limited to, assumption and rejection of unexpired 
       leases pursuant to ll U.S.C. section 365, and the allowance 
       and determination of administrative expenses claims and 
       prepetition claims made pursuant to the Leases;
   (5) declaring that GE Cap has willfully violated and 
       disregarded the automatic stay by taking actions to obtain 
       possession of HII's or, in the alternative, Harnco's and 
       JTI's property and by otherwise harassing or interfering 
       with Harnco's and JTI's conduct of their chapter 11 cases;
   (6) awarding HII or, in the alternative, Harnco and JTI, actual 
       damages, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses for GE Cap's 
       contractual breaches and willful violations of the 
       automatic stay;
   (7) enjoining GE Cap from further violations of the automatic 
       stay and compelling GE Cap to perform its obligations under 
       the Master Agreements or, in the alternative, the Leases, 
       including, but not limited to, its obligations in 
       connection with the purchase of new vehicles to be leased 
       to counterclaimants, the termination of leases, the sale of 
       vehicles, and the refund of rental. 
(Harnischfeger Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 36; Bankruptcy 
Creditors' Service, Inc., 609/392-0900)
HOLLYWOOD VIDEO: May Face Bankruptcy
------------------------------------
Hollywood Video, the nation's second-largest video rental chain, 
is struggling to survive and is more than $260 million in debt. If 
it can't pay its creditors, one analyst says that the Portland-
based company might have to reorganize in bankruptcy court. Over 
the past year, Hollywood's stock price has dropped from about $14 
to just over $1. (ABI 11-Jan-2001)
ICG COMMUNICATIONS: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
--------------------------------------------------------------
Frederick J. Baker, Esq., Senior Assistant U.S. Trustee, has 
appointed these creditors to serve on the Official Creditors' 
Committee in ICG Communication's on-going chapter 11 
reorganization: 
      W. R. Huff Asset Management Co., LLC
      67 Park Place
      Morristown, New Jersey 07960
          Attn: Mr. Joseph R. Thornton
          Tele: (973) 984-1233
          Fax: (973) 984-5818
      Aetna Life Insurance Company
      Aetna Health & Life Insurance Company
      Corporate Health Insurance Company
      151 Farmington Avenue, RTAA
      Hartford, Connecticut
          Attn: Mr. Brian J. Lessard
          Tele: (860) 273-8518
          Fax: (860) 273-8560
      Cerberus Capital Management, LP
      450 Park Avenue, 28th Floor
      New York, New York 10022
          Attn: Mr. Seth P. Plattus
          Tele: (212) 891-2120
          Fax: (212) 891-1541
      Conseco Capital Management
      11825 North Pennsylvania Street
      Carmel, Indiana 46032
          Attn: Mr. Eric Johnson
          Tele: (317) 817-6806
          Fax: (317) 817-4115
      Bank One, N.A.
      100 East Broad Street, 8th Floor
      Columbus, Ohio 43215-0181
          Attn: Mr. Eric Michael Stoller
          Tele: (614) 248-5579
          Fax: (614) 248-5195
      Lucent Technologies Inc.
      5 Wood Hollow Road, Room 1165
      Parsippany, New Jersey 07054
          Attn: Mr. Ed Ronco
          Tele: (973) 581-4350
          Fax: (530) 327-7188
      Qwest Communications Corporation
      555 17th Street, 12th Floor
      Denver, Colorado 80202
          Attn: Ms. Wendy Wagner
          Tele: (303) 992-5338
          Fax: (303) 992-1490
The Assistant U. S. Trustee assigned to these cases is Frank J. 
Perch, Esq., Tele: (302) 573-6491; Fax: (302) 573-6497.  (ICG 
Communications Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 3; Bankruptcy Creditors' 
Service, Inc., 609/392-0900)
LERNOUT & HAUSPIE: Pays Shipping, Warehouse and Customs Charges
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the normal course of business the Lernout & Hauspie rely on 
particular common carriers to ship, transport and deliver goods, 
materials, and supplies to various places, including manufacturing 
facilities. It depends on the shippers for timely, consistent 
deliveries, and the shippers' services are key to the Debtors' 
operations. Goods which are in transit are often deposited at 
warehouses that are not owned or otherwise controlled by the 
Debtors, but rather are owned and/or controlled by independent 
third parties. In addition, depending on the origin of the goods 
at issue, it incurs various customs charges and duties 
attributable to the importation and exportation of such goods.
As a result of the commencement of these Chapter 11 cases, some 
shippers and warehousemen who hold goods may refuse to release 
these goods pending payment of pre-petition shipping charges, 
thereby disrupting the Debtors' operations. Moreover, for certain 
of the goods, unless the Debtors pay the customers charges, the 
shippers and warehousemen may refuse to release, or may be 
prohibited from releasing, the goods. Unless the Debtors continue 
to receive delivery of goods on a timely and uninterrupted basis, 
its operations will be severely impacted, causing irreparable 
damage to its businesses and reorganization efforts.
By this Motion the Debtors sought and obtained an Order 
authorizing them to pay those shipping and warehousing charges and 
customs charges deemed necessary or appropriate in its business 
judgment in order to obtain the release of goods ordered pre-
petition and held by such shippers and warehousemen on account of 
unpaid invoices. The Debtors obtained this authority to make such 
payments in the amounts and to the extent necessary to satisfy 
undisputed, pre-petition shipping and warehousing charges and 
customs charges, and to satisfy the possessory liens, if any, on 
goods that may be held by a shipper or warehouseman or customs 
authority pending the payment of such shipping and warehousing 
charges or customs charges. (Lernout & Hauspie Bankruptcy News, 
Issue No. 2, Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., 609/392-0900) 
LIDS CORPORATION: Wells Fargo Extends $25 Million DIP Financing
---------------------------------------------------------------
Retail asset-based lender Wells Fargo Retail Finance, of Boston, 
Mass., has provided a $25 million line of credit to Lids
Corporation, of Westwood, Mass., the world's largest headwear 
retailer. Lids Corporation filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on 
Tuesday, January 4, 2000 in a Delaware Federal Bankruptcy Court.
"Wells Fargo Retail Finance was a logical alternative for us," 
said Nancy Babine-Kucinski, Lids' Chief Executive Officer. "They 
showed from the beginning they could be practical and flexible in 
helping us to reorganize our business for the future."
Lids Corporation is a privately held retailer of specialty 
headwear. The company was founded in 1992 and currently operates 
388 stores in 47 states. These locations are supported by a 
Warehouse/Distribution Center located in Randolph, Mass.
"Lids Corporation has a proven merchandising concept, and we look 
forward to supporting Nancy Babine-Kucinski and her management 
team," said Wells Fargo Retail Finance Senior Managing Director 
and Co-COO Andrew Moser. "We're pleased to help the company by 
providing the added liquidity necessary to help reposition the 
business for the future."
Based in Boston, Mass., with additional offices located in 
Philadelphia and Los Angeles, Wells Fargo Retail Finance was 
formed in December 2000 when Foothill Capital of Los Angeles 
acquired the remaining interest in Paragon Capital LLC of Boston. 
As an autonomous, self-contained business unit, Wells Fargo Retail 
Finance has nearly $1.8 billion in retail commitments and is
growing.
LOEWEN: Selling 4 Funeral Homes & 2 Cemeteries for $1 Million
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor-affiliates of The Loewen Group, Inc.: 
     * Hadley Funeral Chapels, Inc., 
     * Coge Investment Corporation, 
     * Memorial Consultants of California, Inc. and 
     * Lake Havasu Memorial Gardens.
propose to sell: 
(A) Funeral Homes that are California corporations:
    (1) Hadley Funeral Chapels, Inc. doing business as Hadley 
        Funeral Chapels, Inc. (Visalia)(2613)
    (2) Hadley Funeral Chapels, Inc. doing business as Hadley 
        Funeral Chapels, Inc. (Farmersville)(2614)
    (3) Coge Investment Corporation doing business as Oceanside 
        Mortuary (3153)
    (4) Memorial Consultants of California, Inc. doing business as 
        Mountain Valley Mortuary (3563) 
(B) Cemeteries:
    (1) Memorial Consultants of California, Inc. a California 
        corporation, doing business as Mountain Valley Memorial 
        Park (5802)
    (2) Lake Havasu Memorial Gardens, Inc. an Arizona corporation, 
        doing business as Lake Havasu Memorial Gardens (5823)
As part of the Disposition Program, the Selling Debtors sought and 
obtained the Court's authority: (i) to sell the funeral home and 
cemetery businesses and related assets at the Sale Locations to 
the Purchaser that the Debtors determine has submitted the highest 
and best offer, free of all liens, claims and encumberances; and 
(ii) to assume and assign to the Purchaser the 7 executory 
contracts and unexpired leases, pursuant to section 363 of the 
Bankruptcy Code.
Pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, the Initial Bidder 
(Desert Cremation Society, Inc.) and the Debtors have agreed to a 
purchase price of $1,000,000 subject to higher and better offers, 
and to the Court's approval. All accounts receivable, transferable 
permits and goodwill relating to the businesses conducted at the 
Sale Location will be transferred to the Initial Bidder. The 
Initial Bidder agrees to pay, and to hold the Selling Debtor 
harmless from, all costs and other expenses associated with the 
sale, such as taxes, levies and license and registration fees. The 
Initial Bidder paid the Selling Debtors a deposit of $50,000 upon 
the execution of the Purchase Agreement and agrees to pay the 
remainder of the Purchase Price at the closing. 
In connection with the proposed sale of the Sale Locations, Neweol 
would sell and the Initial Bidder would purchase certain accounts 
receivable related to the Sale Locations pursuant to a purchase 
agreement between Neweol and the Initial Bidder. The amount of the 
Neweol Allocation will be determined immediately prior to closing.
In accordance with the Net Asset Sale Proceeds Procedures, the 
Debtors will use the proceeds generated to repay any outstanding 
balances under the Replacement DIP Facility and deposit the net 
proceeds into an account maintained by LGII at First Union 
National Bank for investment, pending ultimate distribution on 
court order. Funds necessary to pay bona fide direct costs of a 
sale may be paid from the account without further order of the 
Court.( Loewen Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 32; Bankruptcy 
Creditors' Service, Inc., 609/392-0900)
LTV CORPORATION: Threatens Shut Down if Lenders Don't Cooperate
---------------------------------------------------------------
As a precautionary and prophylactic measure, in the unlikely event 
that LTV Corporation is unable to obtain permanent access to 
postpetition financing or the continuing use of their Prepetition 
Lenders' cash collateral, the Debtors present Judge Bodoh with a 
Motion seeking authority to take any and all actions necessary or 
appropriate in the exercise of their business judgment to:
   (i) discontinue their business operations and pursue a shut-
       down of their facilities; and 
   (ii) in connection with this, comply with applicable federal, 
        state and local regulations and protect public health and 
        safety.
The Debtors stress that their primary objective is to continue 
operating their businesses and reorganize in Chapter 11 for the 
benefit of their creditors, employees, retirees, customers, 
communities and other stakeholders, the Debtors lack sufficient 
liquidity to maintain ongoing operations without the immediate and 
permanent use of postpetition financing or use of cash collateral 
or other funds. While the Debtors are taking every available step 
to avoid a precipitous shut-down that would put 17,500 employees 
out of work, leave 100,000 retirees and their dependents without 
health care, and pose potentially serious safety issues to the 
general public, that possibility exists if the Debtors are 
unable to arrange for continued financing of its operations. 
OSAGE SYSTEMS: Inks Deal to Sell Assets to Pomeroy Computer
-----------------------------------------------------------
 Osage Systems Group Inc. (AMEX: OSE) has entered into a letter of 
intent (LOI) providing for the sale of operating assets and
the business of Osage to Pomeroy Computer Resources Inc. (Nasdaq: 
PMRY).  The purchase price is undisclosed at this time.
The transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including 
negotiation of definitive agreements and customary approvals and 
consents. It is contemplated that the transaction will also be 
effected through the provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and 
will, accordingly, be subject to court approval.
If the sale is completed, Pomeroy anticipates that the systems 
integration and consulting business of Osage will operate as 
additional branch offices of the company.
"This proposed transaction should provide Pomeroy with the 
opportunity to acquire the business and capabilities associated 
with Osage's talented group of employees. It will also give the 
company a presence in geographies where we currently do not have 
facilities," commented Stephen E. Pomeroy, president of Pomeroy.
Over the past several months, management of Osage has sought 
capital to fund prior obligations and support its operations. 
Until recently, Osage has been able to generate operating cash 
flow but has not had sufficient capital support to overcome past 
obligations and support operations.
Because of its capital constraints, Osage has at times been unable 
to secure the necessary credit to purchase needed hardware and 
software for sale to its customers, resulting in lost sales 
opportunities. This has been a contributor to a major downturn in 
sales and operating cash flow in the fourth quarter.
In light of Osage's inability to show a profit, its capital 
providers have been reluctant to continue to invest additional 
capital or fulfill their capital commitments. Currently, Osage 
does not have the cash availability to meet critical payments to 
maintain its operations independently.
"The proposed sale to Pomeroy should permit the business of Osage 
to continue and develop as part of Pomeroy while providing the 
greatest value to Osage stakeholders," commented Phil Carter, 
chief executive officer of Osage.
This transaction will take place under the provisions of 
bankruptcy laws. Osage has engaged Hodgson Russ LLP as bankruptcy 
counsel to advise on all creditor issues.
                          About Osage
Osage Systems Group (http://www.osage.com)designs, implements and  
supports eBusiness solutions for the Networked Economy(TM). With a 
comprehensive and fully integrated set of eBusiness capabilities, 
Osage strategically links infrastructure, integration, 
information, and intelligence.
Osage partners, including Sun Microsystems, Cisco, Veritas, and 
Oracle, provide the industry-leading technologies that help shape 
Osage solutions, enabling customers to achieve a powerful Internet 
presence. Osage is the intelligent path for business leaders to 
follow in order to achieve optimum results in the robust, web-
centered environment.
OWENS-CORNING: Bonded Judgment Creditor Seeks Relief from Stay
--------------------------------------------------------------
Alice Meinert, a creditor holding a bonded judgment against Debtor 
Owens Corning, asks the Bankruptcy Court to terminate the 
automatic stay and allow her to prosecute an appeal which Owens 
Corning has taken from her judgment against it.  Mrs. Meinert's 
husband died in 1991 from a form of cancer caused by exposure to 
asbestos. Mrs. Meinert filed suit in District Court in Dallas 
County, Texas, against Owens Corning and other defendants, 
alleging that her husband's illness was caused by his exposure 
to asbestos-containing products manufactured by the various 
defendants. 
After settling with all of the other defendants, the case 
proceeded to trial against Owens Corning. The trial jury returned 
a verdict in favor of Mrs. Meinert and the trial court rendered 
judgment on the verdict for $3,788,000 in compensatory damages, 
$1,000,000 in punitive damages, and $63,099 in prejudgment 
interest and postjudgment interest until the judgment is paid at 
the statutory rate of 12%.
Owens Corning posted a supersedeas bond in the amount of 
$5,578,764 through Continental Casualty Company to stay execution 
of the judgment pending appeal to the Court of Appeals for the 
Fifth District in Texas. Subsequently Owens supplemented this bond 
with an "increase rider" that increased security for the judgment 
to $6,015,363 to reflect postjudgment interest that had 
accumulated. Owens filed a second supplement increasing the bond 
amount to $6,450,231.70, and a third supplement increasing it to 
$6,815,444.82. The case has been presented in oral argument to the 
Court of Appeals in June, 2000; however, no opinion has been 
issued.
Noting that the automatic stay of creditor action attendant upon 
the filing of a petition in bankruptcy stays all judicial 
proceedings against a debtor, including appeals prosecuted by the 
debtor from judgments against the debtor, Mrs. Meinert, through 
her attorney Brett M. Rosenthal of the Dallas, Texas, firm of 
Baron & Budd have asked that Judge Walrath terminate the 
bankruptcy stay to permit the appeal to continue to conclusion. 
(Owens-Corning Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 7, Bankruptcy Creditors' 
Service, Inc., 609/392-0900)
PILLOWTEX: Establishes Interim Professional Compensation Protocol
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pillowtex has filed a Motion seeking judicial approval of a plan 
for establishing procedures for interim compensation and 
reimbursement of expenses for the various professionals employed 
by the Chapter 11 estates.
On November 15, 2000, the Debtors filed applications to retain 
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue as lead counsel, and Morris, Nichols, 
Arsht & Tunnell as local counsel. The Debtors have also sought 
authority to employ E&Y Capital Advisors LLC as financial 
advisors; KPMG LLP as independent auditors and tax, accounting, 
and compensation advisors, and Arthur Andersen LLP as business 
consultants. The Debtors anticipate that, as these cases progress, 
they may need to retain other professionals in connection with 
their reorganization efforts. In addition, a statutory committee 
of unsecured creditors has been appointed and the Debtors 
anticipate that the committee will retain counsel and possibly 
other professionals to assist it in fulfilling its obligations in 
these cases.
The Debtors have therefore requested entry of an order authorizing 
and establishing procedures for the compensation and reimbursement 
of court-approved professionals on a monthly basis. Such a 
procedure will streamline the professional compensation process 
and enable the Court and all other parties to monitor the 
professional fees incurred in these Chapter 11 cases more 
effectively. Specifically, the Debtors proposed that, except as 
otherwise provided in an order of the court authorizing the 
retention of a particular professional, the professionals be 
permitted to seek interim payment of compensation and 
reimbursement of expenses in accordance with the following 
procedures:
      No earlier than the 25th day of each calendar month, each 
      Professional seeking interim compensation shall file an   
      application for interim approval and allowance of 
      compensation for services rendered and reimbursement of 
      expense incurred during the immediately preceding month, and 
      serve a copy of such fee application on the Debtors, counsel  
      to the Debtors, the Office of the United States Trustee, 
      counsel to the Creditors' Committee, counsel to any other 
      official committee appointed in these cases, and counsel to 
      the Debtors' proposed postpetition lenders. All fee 
      applications will comply with the Bankruptcy Code, the 
      Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, applicable Third 
      Circuit law, and the Local Rules of this Court. Each Noticed 
      Party will have twenty days after service of a fee 
      application to object thereto. Upon the expiration of the 
      objection deadline, the professional may file a certificate 
      of no objection with the Court after which the Debtors are 
      authorized to pay each professional an amount equal to the 
      lesser of (i) 80% of the fees and 100% of the expenses 
      required in the fee application; and (ii) 80% of the fees 
      and 100% of the expenses not subject to an objection.
If any Noticed Party objects to a professional's fee application, 
it must file with the Court and serve on the affected professional 
and each of the Noticed Parties a written objection, which must be 
filed with the Court and received by the affected Professional and 
the Noticed Parties on or before the Objection Deadline. 
Thereafter, the objecting party and the affected professional may 
attempt to resolve the objection on a consensual basis. If the 
parties are unable to reach a resolution of the objection within 
twenty days after service of the objection, the affected 
professional may either: (i) file the Objection with the Court, 
together with a request for payment of the difference, if any, 
between the Maximum Interim Payment and the Actual Interim Payment 
made to the affected professional; or (ii) forego payment of that 
amount until the next interim or final fee application hearing, at 
which time the Court will consider and dispose of the Objection if 
requested by the parties.
Professionals will be required to submit their initial fee 
application on or before January 25, 2001. This initial fee 
application will cover the period from the Petition Date through 
and including December 31, 2000.
At three-month intervals, each of the professionals must file with 
the court and serve on the Noticed Parties a request for interim 
Court approval and allowance of the compensation and reimbursement 
of expenses sought in the fee applications filed during the 
interim fee period. The Interim Fee Application Request must 
include a summary of the Fee Applications that are the subject of 
the request and any other information requested by the Court or 
required by the local rules. Each Professional must file its 
Interim Fee    Application Request within 45 days after the end of 
the Interim Fee Period for which the request seeks allowance of 
fees and reimbursement of expenses. Each professional must file 
its first Interim Fee Application Request on or before April 16, 
2001, and the first Interim Fee Application Request should cover 
the Interim Fee Period from the Petition Date through and 
including February 28, 2001. Any professional that fails to file 
an Interim Fee Application Request when due will be ineligible to 
receive further interim payment of fees or expenses under the 
compensation procedures until such time as a further Interim Fee 
Application Request is submitted by the professional.
The Debtors shall request that the court schedule a hearing on the 
Interim Fee Applications at least once every six months, or at 
such other intervals as the Court deems appropriate.
The pendency of an objection to payment of compensation or 
reimbursement of expenses will not disqualify a professional from 
the future payment of compensation or reimbursement of expenses 
under these compensation procedures.
Neither (i) the payment of or the failure to pay, in whole or in 
part, monthly interim compensation and reimbursement of expenses 
under these compensation procedures, nor (ii) the filing of or 
failure to file an objection will bind any party in interest or 
the Court with respect to the allowance of applications for 
compensation and reimbursement of expenses of professionals. All 
fees and expense paid to professionals under the compensation 
procedures are subject to disgorgement until final allowance by 
the Court.
The Debtors further requested that each member of the Creditors' 
Committee be permitted to submit statements of expense (excluding 
committee member counsel expense) and supporting vouchers to 
counsel to the Creditors' Committee, which will collect and submit 
the Creditors' Committee members' requests for reimbursement in 
accordance with the compensation procedure.  (Pillowtex Bankruptcy 
News, Issue No. 3, Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., 609/392-
0900) 
SAFETY-KLEEN: Ryder Moves for Assumption of 287 Truck Leases 
------------------------------------------------------------
Through its attorney David Carickhoff, Jr., and John T. Carroll, 
III, of the Wilmington, Delaware, firm of Cozen and O'Connor, 
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., has brought a Motion seeking Judge 
Walsh's Order compelling Safety-Kleen to assume or reject 287 
Truck Lease and Service Agreements with Ryder. Prior to the 
Petition Date, Ryder claimed that the Debtors had accumulated 
$946,697.38 in unpaid truck lease charges, which remain unpaid. 
Post-petition obligations have been paid as due, but the Debtors 
have not assumed or rejected the Leases, nor paid any part of the 
pre-petition obligation. Concurrently, Ryder filed a Motion 
seeking relief from the bankruptcy stay to setoff certain monies 
in its possession against the pre-petition obligations, which 
would reduce the liability to $251,624.16. If the Debtors rejected 
the Leases, Ryder would be damaged to the extent of the pre-
petition obligation, any unpaid post-petition obligation, and 
would be entitled to lease termination damages in the amount of 
$4,919,534.13.
Ryder has asked Judge Walsh to order Safety-Kleen to post a cash 
bond equal to one month's charges under the lease, or $650,000, 
and to order continued payment of all post-petition amounts due, 
and to grant Ryder the immediate right to repossess the vehicles 
in the event that the bond is not posted in the amount stated. The 
necessity of Ryder's tracking the actual position of each vehicle, 
together with the Debtors' pre-petition default, are cited by 
Ryder as support for the bond requirement. (Safety-Kleen 
Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 12, Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, 
Inc., 609/392-0900)
STROUDS INC: Appoints Tom Paccioretti as President and CEO
----------------------------------------------------------
Strouds, Inc. appointed Thomas S. Paccioretti as President and 
Chief Executive Officer, effective December 1, 2000. Mr.
Paccioretti succeeds John P. Brincko, who had been Interim 
President and Chief Executive Officer since September 2000. Mr. 
Brincko and international management consulting firm Brincko 
Associates, Inc. will continue as financial advisors to the 
Company.
Mr. Paccioretti, 45, a Certified Turnaround Professional (CTP), 
has been actively involved in the direction and operation of 
Strouds since the Company began its voluntary restructuring under 
Chapter 11 on September 7, 2000.
A Senior Vice President of Brincko Associates, which advises 
financially troubled companies and their investors, Mr. 
Paccioretti has more than 12 years of experience in crisis 
management, interim management and reorganization engagements. He 
has assumed senior management positions in turnaround situations 
within a variety of industries including retail, distribution, 
insurance, hospitality, construction, computer software and 
agriculture. Recent assignments include Interim CEO of Sullivan 
Kelly Associates and senior positions at Barneys New York, 
Mossimo, Inc., Calcomp/A Lockheed Martin Company, Progressive 
Dairies, Inc. and GENISCO.
"Tom Paccioretti brings to this position an extensive background 
in corporate turnarounds and retail management, and we look 
forward to the benefits of his expertise as Strouds moves forward 
in the next critical phase of its voluntary restructuring under 
Chapter 11," said Bill Stroud, chairman and founder of Strouds.
Strouds, Inc., the Linen Experts(R), is a specialty retailer of 
bed, bath, tabletop and other home textile products. The Company 
currently operates 70 stores in five states and also markets its 
home products through its Web sites, http://www.linenexperts.com 
and http://www.strouds.com.
SUN HEALTHCARE: Stipulation Allows Insured Claim To Proceed 
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sun Healthcare consents to lift the automatic stay to permit the 
representative of James Steinhauer to file and serve a complaint 
on Sun and to permit the prosecution and defense of the State 
Court Action (whether filed in Federal or State Court) in 
connection with James Steinhauer's allegedly sustained injuries at 
Retirement Care Associates, Inc. d/b/a Orlando Health Care Center. 
Ronald  Steinhauer, as next friend and legal guardian of James 
Steinhauer filed suit against Sun in the Circuit Court of the 
Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida (Case No. 
C1000-5257 Div 33). 
The parties agree that Claimant may enforce settlement or 
disposition in the court action to the extent such claims are 
covered by proceeds from any applicable Sun liability insurance 
policies and shall be entitled to assert a general unsecured claim 
in the Bankruptcy Court for such amount of the self-insured 
retention obligation of Sun, but Claimant shall not enforce to 
collect any amount from Sun, Sun's current and former employees, 
officers and directors, or any person indemnified by Sun or 
listed as an additional insured under any of Sun's Liability 
policies. 
Judge Walrath has given her stamp of approval to the agreement.
(Sun Healthcare Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 17; Bankruptcy 
Creditors' Service, Inc., 609/392-0900)
TEARDROP GOLF: Bids for Assets to Begin at $18.6 Million
-------------------=------------------------------------
TearDrop(R) Golf Company (NASDAQ SC Symbol:TDRP) said that a
hearing was scheduled on January 10 at 12:30 p.m. in the United 
States District Court for the District of Delaware in Wilmington, 
Delaware to approve the sale of substantially all of TearDrop's 
assets. A bid of $18 million has been entered by Gen-X Sport, Inc. 
The opening bid for interested bidders will begin at $18.6 
million.
Competitive bidders are invited to submit competing bid proposals, 
provided the terms of the offer are higher or more favorable to 
TearDrop and exceed the minimum bid requirement as approved by the 
court.
Information may be obtained by contacting Charles Vihon, Esq., 
Arnstein & Lehr, 120 South Riverside Plaza, Chicago, IL 60606, 
Telephone 312-876-7100, Facsimile 312-876-0288.
Those interested in participating in the bidding procedure must 
made their interest known no later than 5:00 p.m. Central Standard 
Time, January 15, 2001. All competing bids shall be submitted in 
writing and filed with the bankruptcy court, and served upon 
TearDrop, Congress Financial Corporation and counsel for the 
Creditors' Committee, no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Standard Time on January 17, 2001. Service lists can be obtained 
upon request.
               About TearDrop Golf Company
The TearDrop(R) Golf Company (http://www.teardropgolf.com)isthe  
leading manufacturer of premium putters using ROLL-FACE(TM) 
Technology. TearDrop's wholly owned subsidiaries, Tommy Armour(R) 
Golf (http://www.armourgolf.com)and RAM(R) Golf  
(http://www.ramgolf.com),are two of the world's finest  
manufacturers of golf clubs and accessories.
TWA: Fitch Says Filing May Impact Aircraft Lease Securitizations
----------------------------------------------------------------
The TWA bankruptcy filing is one part of American Airlines' plan 
to acquire the airline, and may lead to a renegotiation of certain 
TWA aircraft leases.
TWA is an obligor in seven different aircraft operating lease pool
securitizations rated by Fitch. As a percentage of initial 
appraised value, the aircraft leased by the airline place TWA 
among the top five obligors in the first four of the seven 
transactions listed. The aircraft in all transactions consist of 
recently manufactured, stage III noise compliant, Boeing or 
McDonnell Douglas commercial jet aircraft. Ranked by percentage of
initial appraised value, the exposures to TWA leased aircraft in 
each of these seven securitizations are set forth below:
-- 1. Pegasus Aviation Lease Securitization, series 1999-1 (top
      obligor in the pool and 16% of initial appraised value)
-- 2. Pegasus Aviation Lease Securitization II, series 2000-1
      (10.7% of initial appraised value)
-- 3. Embarcadero Aircraft Securitization Trust, series 2000-1
      (9.7% of initial appraised value)
-- 4. Morgan Stanley Aircraft Finance (5.3% of initial appraised
      value)
-- 5. AerCo Limited (3.3% of initial appraised value)
-- 6. Aviation Capital Group Trust, series 2000-1 (2.1% of
      initial appraised value)
-- 7. Airplanes Pass Through Trust (50 basis points of initial
      appraised value)
Fitch is concerned that the rejection of certain TWA leases or the
renegotiation of terms on certain TWA leases by American Airlines 
may adversely affect the cashflows available to the noteholders in 
the above mentioned securitizations.
As a part of the cashflow stress scenarios run during the rating 
process, Fitch applies a level of lease payment reductions to 
address situations such as this.
Fitch is currently monitoring the developments concerning this 
proposed acquisition, however, the actual impact of any potential 
lease renegotiations may not be known for several months.
USA BIOMASS: Delisted from Nasdaq Smallcap Market
-------------------------------------------------
Bell Gargens, Calif.-based USA Biomass Corp, a waste management 
firm which filed for bankruptcy protection on December 8, 2000 has 
been delisted from the Nasdaq Smallcap Market, Reuters reports. 
Last year, Nasdaq said that the company was not able to meet the 
required income and market capitalization.
VENCOR: Proposes 16th Amendment to DIP Credit Agreement
-------------------------------------------------------
Vencor seeks the Court's approval of the extension and sixteenth 
amendment of the DIP Credit Agreement dated September 13, 2000 
which provides that:
  (1) The Stated Maturity Date of the Loans under the DIP Credit 
      Agreement is extended from January 31, 2001 to March 31, 
      2001;
  (2) The time period within which the Debtors would be obliged to 
      file with the Court a joint plan of reorganization and 
      disclosure statement and an appropriate motion requesting     
      the confirmation and consummation of the Plan, all in form 
      and substance satisfactory to the Required Lenders, is 
      extended to March 31, 2001; 
  (3) The definition of "Borrowing Base" is amended to add  
      borrowing Base levels for February 2001 and March 2001 of 
      $47,793,095 (the level of the Tranche A Commitments on or 
      about January 2, 2001, taking account of Commitment 
      reductions to date primarily in connection with Asset 
      Sales);
  (4) Section 2.05(a) of the DIP Credit Agreement is amended to 
      extend the deadline for issuances of letters of credit to 
      January 31, 2001;
  (5) Section 5.01(b) of the DIP Credit Agreement is amended to 
      provide deadlines for the delivery by Vencor of financial 
      statements and related information for January, February and 
      March 2001;
  (6) The Cash Plan Supplement for February 2001 and March 2001 s 
      approved;
  (7) The financial covenants set forth in Sections 6.01, 6.03 and 
      6.06 of the DIP Credit Agreement (which deal with      
      Consolidated EBITDAR, Hospital Daily Census and Consolidated 
      Capital Expenditures) are amended to provide test figures 
      for February 2001 and March 2001;
  (8) The Debtors will pay to the DIP Agent an amendment fee in 
      the aggregate amount of $100,000; and
  (9) A new clause is added to Section 7.02 of the DIP Credit 
      Agreement:
          -- "Liens created in favor of PNC Bank, N.A., pursuant 
             to the deposit Account Control Agreement by and among 
             Vencor, PNC Bank, N.A., and the Collateral Agent."
The Debtors submit that the Sixteenth Amendment has been 
negotiated at arms' length and in good faith. The Debtors believe 
that the Sixteenth Amendment and the proposed Amendment Fee are in 
the best interests of the Debtors and their estates and should be 
approved by the Court. (Vencor Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 23; 
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., 609/392-0900)
VLASIC FOODS: May Sell Pickle Business to H.J. Heinz Co. 
--------------------------------------------------------
H.J. Heinz Co. is negotiating to buy Vlasic Foods International's 
pickle business, days before Vlasic's creditors are expected to 
force the company to file for bankruptcy protection. Vlasic is 
expected to fetch about $250 million and Heinz is one of several 
suitors speaking to Vlasic about its pickle line. A deal could be 
announced by the end of the month.
Vlasic - burdened by a $500 million debt load - is facing 
insolvency by the end of the month after missing a $10 million 
debt payment on Dec. 28, 2000, and receiving a grace period until 
Jan. 30. Besides its condiment business, Vlasic also markets the 
Swanson frozen food brand and has an international line.
At least one analyst says Vlasic would not be a good investment 
for Heinz. "I could probably think of better uses of that money," 
said Jaine Mehring, an analyst at Salomon Smith Barney Inc. "The 
pickle business is one more thing where they are going to have to 
prove something, and they have enough of those brands."(ABI 11-
Jan-2001)
WASTE SYSTEMS: Files for Chapter 11 Reorganization
--------------------------------------------------
Waste Systems International, Inc. (NASDAQ: WSII) and each of its 
30 subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under 
Chapter 11 of the U. S. Bankruptcy Code. WSI will continue to 
operate its business while it seeks to reorganize under Chapter 
11. The petitions were filed in U. S. Bankruptcy Court in 
Wilmington, Delaware on January 11, 2001.  Following a review by 
its Board of Directors of the available alternatives, the Company 
determined that a Chapter 11 reorganization is in the best long-
term interests of the Company and its stakeholders.
"We expect that Chapter 11 will provide the Company with the 
opportunity to address its financial and capital structure 
challenges in an orderly and comprehensive fashion," said John 
Boyer, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer. "The 
Company has arranged debtor in possession financing that we expect 
will provide the Company with sufficient funding to meet the
expenses of running our business during the Chapter 11 
proceedings. We need to deleverage the Company, and believe that 
Chapter 11 is the appropriate venue to seek to do that. We look 
forward to emerging from Chapter 11 as a stronger, more focused 
player in the waste management industry."
Under Chapter 11, a company is protected from its creditors while 
it continues to operate its business and to negotiate a repayment 
plan. Waste Systems International is a fully integrated non-
hazardous solid waste management company that provides solid waste 
collection, recycling, transfer and disposal services to 
commercial, industrial, residential and municipal customers within 
certain regional markets in Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, 
New York, Pennsylvania, and the Baltimore/Washington, D.C. area.
WASTE SYSTEMS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Waste Systems International, Inc.
        420 Bedford Street, Suite 300
        Lexington, MA 02420
Debtor Affiliates: WSI Medical Waste Systems, Inc.
                   WSI New York Holdings, Inc.
                   WSI of New York,Inc.
                   WSI Camden Transfer Station, Inc.
                   Palmer Resource Recovery Corporation
                   WSI Vermont Holdings, Inc.
                   WSI Moretown Landfill, Inc.
                   WSI of Vermont,Inc.
                   WSI Burlington Transfer Station,Inc.
                   WSI St. Johnsbury Transfer Station, Inc.
                   WSI Waitsfield Transfer Station, Inc.
                   WSI Massachusetts Holdings, Inc.
                   Waste Systems International
                   of Massachusetts Hauling,Inc.
                   Waste Systems International
                   of South Hadley, Inc.
                   Waste Systems International Oxford
                   Transfer Station,Inc.
                   Waste Systems International Massachusetts
                   Recycling, Inc.
                   Waste Systems International Lynn Transfer
                   Station, Inc.
                   Spartan Consolidated, Inc.
                   Sterling Packaging, Inc.
                   WSI Pennsylvania Holdings, Inc.
                   WSI Sandy Run Landfill, Inc.
                   WSI Altoona Hauling, Inc.
                   Mostoller Landfill, Inc.
                   WSI Somerset Hauling, Inc.
                   Community Refuse Service, Inc.
                   WSI Harrisburg Hauling, Inc.
                   WSI Mifflin County Landfill, Inc.
                   WSI Maryland Holdings, Inc.
                   Eastern Trans-Waste of Maryland, Inc.
                   WSI Maryland Mauling, Inc.
Type of Business: Solid waste collection, recycling, transfer
                  and disposal services to commercial, industrial, 
                  residential and municipal customers.
Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 11, 2001
Court: District of Delaware
Bankruptcy Case No.: 01-00099
Debtor's Counsel: Scott D. Cousins, Esq.
                  Greenberg Traurig, LLP
                  222 Delaware Ave.
                  15th Floor
                  Wilmington, DE 19801
                  (302) 655-4880
                      
                         and 
                  Daniel C. Cohn, Esq. 
                  Cohn & Kelakos LLP 
                  101 Arch Street 
                  Boston, Massachusetts 02110 
                  Telephone: 617-951-2505 
                  Telecopier: 617-951-0679 
Debtors' Financial Advisor: Peter S. Kaufman  
                            Gordian Group
                            500 Park Ave. 
                            New York, NY 10022 
Total Assets: $202,415,070
Total Debts: $167,004,357
List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:
Creditor                 Nature of Claim          Claim Amount
--------                 ---------------          ------------
Goldman, Sachs & Co.     Noteholder - 11.5%        $32,500,000
Contact: Patricia Baldwin
1 New York Plaza,
45th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Tel: 212-902-8244
Fax: 212-902-1431
Bank of New York         Noteholder - 11.5%        $25,185,000
Contact: Cecile Lamarco
925 Patterson Plank Road
Secaucus, NJ 07094
Tel: 201-319-3066
Fax: 201-319-3073
Morgan Stanley & Co.     Noteholder - 11.5%        $15,000,000
Incorporated
Contact: Launa McAfee
One Pierrepoint Plaza
7th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
Tel: 718-754-5266
Fax: 718-754-4291
Credit Suisse Asset      Noteholder - 11.5%         $4,400,000
Management
Contact: Rich Lindquist
466 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Tel: 212-875-3500
Fax: 646-658-0728
Citibank, N.A.           Noteholder - 11.5%         $2,450,000
Contact: Marta Hoosain
3800 Citicorp Center
Tampa
Tampa, FL 33610-9122
Tel: 813-604-1190
Fax: 813-604-1155
ING Barings, LLC         Noteholder - 11.5%         $2,000,000
Corp. Actions
Department
Contact: Peter Russomondo
350 Park Avenue
2nd Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212-409-0204
Fax: 212-409-0296
Waste Management, Inc.   Disposal Vendor            $1,940,000
Contact: Lee Solheid
4 Liberty Lane West
Hampton, NH 03842
Tel: 603-929-3000
Fax: 603-929-3139
Boston Safe Deposit      Noteholder - 11.5%         $1,265,000
and Trust Company
Contact: Constance Holloway
c/o Mellon Bank, NA
Center, Global Corp.
Action Unit
Room 153-3015
Pittsburgh, PA 15259
Tel: 412-234-2929
Fax: 412-234-7244
State Street Bank &       Noteholder - 11.5%        $1,095,000
Trust Company
Contact: Joseph J. Callahan
JAB 5NW
1776 Heritage Drive
North Quincy, MA 02171
Tel: 617-985-6453
Fax: 617-537-5004
FUND-Phila. Main           Noteholder - 11.5%         $905,000
Contact: Marge Rozelle
123 South Road Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Tel: 215-670-4622
National Earth             Contractor                 $754,000
Products, Inc.
Contact: Charles Gearhardt
245 Butler Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17601
Tel: 717-390-9892
Fax: 717-390-9896
Investors Fiduciary       Noteholder - 11.5%          $750,000
Trust Company/SSB
Contact: Joseph J. Callahan
1776 Heritage Drive
Global Corporate
Action, Unit JAB SNW
No. Quincy, MA 02171
Tel: 617-985-6453
Fax: 617-537-5004
Firstar Bank, N.A.        Noteholder - 11.5%          $550,000
Contact: Carolyn Holt
425 Walnut Street
Location CN-WM-06CT
Cincinnati, OH 45201
Tel: 513-623-4450
Fax: 513-287-8372 
Terry Hastings           Lawsuit Settlement           $550,000
337 Pakachoag Street
Auburn, MA 01501
Tel: 508-873-4188
Fax: 508-791-1201
John Hastings
25 Wayside Road
Westborough, MA 01581
Tel: 617-538-4219
Fax: 508-791-1201
Bankers Trust                Noteholder - 11.5%       $525,000    
Company
Contact: John Lasher
C/o BT Services
Tennessee, Inc.
648 Grassmere  Park
Drive
Nashville, TN 37211
Tel: 615-835-3410
Fax: 615-835-3409
Investors Bank &             Noteholder - 11.5%       $500,000
Trust Company
Contact: Joanne Lowe
200 Clarendon St.
15th Floor
Hancock Tower
Boston, MA 02116
Tel: 617-330-6562
Fax: 617-330-6549
Swiss American              Noteholder - 11.5%        $450,000
Securities, Inc.
Contact: Glenn Pizer
100 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
Tel: 212-612-8749
Fax: 212-612-8741
Valley Quarries, Inc.       Contractor                $376,594
Contact: Ron Diehl
P.O. Box J.
Chambergsburg, PA
172-0809
Tel: 717-267-2244
Fax: 717-267-2521
Chase Manhattan Bank        Noteholder - 11.5%        $375,000
Orma-Trim, Supervisor
4 New York Plaza,
13th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Tel: 212-623-6174
Fax: 212-623-4821
CE Remediation, Inc.        Contractor                $365,544
Contact: Sam Crouse
400 Penn Center Blvd.,
Suite 600
Pittsburgh, PA 15235
Tel: 412-823-5200
Fax: 412-823-9234
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH: Noteholders' Tap Hahn Loeser as Local Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Official Noteholders' Committee appointed in Wheeling-Pittsburgh's 
chapter 11 cases presents Judge Bodoh with an application for his 
approval of the Committee's employment of the firm of Hahn Loeser 
& Parks LLP as local counsel for the Committee, nunc pro tunc to 
the Petition Date.
The following legal services will be provided by Hahn Loeser to 
the Noteholders' Committee:
   (a) Advise the Noteholders' Committee concerning its rights, 
       powers and duties under the Bankruptcy Code;
   (b) Advise the Noteholders' Committee concerning the 
       administration of these Chapter 11 cases;
   (c) Advise the Noteholders' Committee concerning any efforts by 
       the Debtors or other parties to collect and to recover 
       property for the benefit of the Debtors' estates;
   (d) Counsel the Noteholders' Committee in connection with the 
       formulation and negotiation and confirmation of a plan of 
       reorganization and the documents related thereto;
   (e) Review the nature, validity and priority of liens asserted 
       against the property of the Debtors and advise the 
       Noteholders' Committee concerning the enforceability of 
       such liens;
   (f) Review the nature, validity and priority of liens asserted 
       against the property of the Debtors and advise the 
       Noteholders' Committee concerning the enforceability of 
       such liens;
   (g) Prepare on behalf of the Noteholders' Committee all 
       necessary and appropriate applications, motions, notices, 
       draft orders and other pleadings, and review all financial 
       and other reports filed in these Chapter 11 cases;
   (h) Advise the Noteholders' Committee concerning, and prepare 
       responses to, applications, motions, pleadings, notices and 
       other pleadings and papers that may be filed in these 
       Chapter 11 cases;
   (i) Advise and assist the Noteholders' Committee in connection 
       with any potential disposition of property of the Debtors' 
       estates;
   (j) Advise the Noteholders' Committee concerning proposed 
       executory contract and unexpired lease assumptions, 
       assignments and rejections;
   (k) Assist the Noteholders' Committee in claims analysis and 
       resolution matters;
   (l) Commence and conduct any and all litigation necessary or 
       appropriate to assert rights on behalf of the Noteholders' 
       Committee, or otherwise further the goals of the 
       Noteholders' Committee in these Chapter 11 cases; and
   (m) Perform all other legal services for and on behalf of the 
       Noteholders' Committee that may be necessary or appropriate 
       to assist the Noteholders' Committee in satisfying its 
       duties under section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code
Lee D. Powar, Esq., a partner in Hahn Loeser, avers that his firm 
is disinterested within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code and 
neither represents nor holds any interest adverse to the 
Committee, the Debtors or these estates on the matters for which 
approval of employment is sought. However, Mr. Powar discloses 
that the firm currently represents The CIT Group/Business Credit, 
Inc. and Foothill Capital Corporation, post-petition lenders to 
the Debtors, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, a prepetition lender to 
the Debtors, in matters unrelated to these Chapter 11 cases. These 
entities have provided the firm with written waivers concerning 
the firm's representation of creditors, including the Noteholders' 
Committee, in these Chapter 11 cases. The firm has also fully 
disclosed its representation of CIT, Foothill and Chase to the 
Noteholders' Committee and has informed the Noteholders' Committee 
that 
it would not commence on behalf of the Noteholders' Committee any 
adversary proceeding in which any of them is an adverse party.
Mr. Powar further discloses that the firm represents 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, one of the financial advisors to the 
Debtors, in a litigation matter, and in connection with alleged 
malpractice claims. The firm has worked with the Debtors' claims 
and noticing agent, Poorman-Douglas Corporation, in a Chapter 11 
case in Pennsylvania, and with Stroock, Stroock & Lavan in a 
Chapter 11 proceeding in the Southern District of New York. The 
firm also provides a variety of services to American Electric 
Power, a creditor of the Debtors, and to BP Energy Company, 
another of the Debtors' creditors. The firm has previously 
performed legal services for Bank One Investment Management Group, 
an affiliate of Bank One NA. In each instance, these 
representations and relationships were not adverse to the estate 
on the matters for which employment is sought.
The current hourly rates charged by those Hahn Loeser 
professionals and paraprofessionals who are anticipated to render 
a majority of the services to the Noteholders' Committee and their 
hourly rates are as follows:
      Partners:   Lee D. Powar           $ 395
                  Lawrence E. Oscar      $ 290
                  Jean R. Robertson      $ 210
      Associates: Jeffrey M. Levinson    $ 210
                  Michael B. Shuster     $ 175
                  Julie L. Kaplan        $ 150
      Paralegals: Colleen M. Beitel      $ 130
                  Joy H. King            $ 120
                  Cheryl A. Sweeney       $ 65
The anticipated range of hourly rates for attorneys and 
paraprofessionals at Hahn Loeser commencing January 1, 2001, is 
$230 to $415 for partners; $220 to $245 for of counsel; $135 to 
$210 for associates; and $80 to $135 for paraprofessionals. These 
rates are subject to change. (Wheeling-Pittsburgh Bankruptcy News, 
Issue No. 4; Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., 609/392-0900)
WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP: Fusient Buys Money-Losing Wrestling Business
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fusient Media Ventures, an integrated media company that invests 
in high-potential, branded media properties, has entered into an 
agreement with Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. (TBS, Inc) to 
acquire the business of World Championship Wrestling (WCW), an 
industry leader in live action-based entertainment. Following the 
acquisition, TBS, Inc. will retain a minority interest in the WCW 
business and long-term programming rights.
The proposed acquisition marks the return of Classic Sports 
Network founders Brian Bedol and Stephen Greenberg to the cable 
arena and the return of former WCW president Eric Bischoff to the 
world of professional wrestling. Celebrated for successfully 
building an entrepreneurial-based cable network, which they later 
sold to ESPN, Bedol and Greenberg went on to found Fusient Media 
Ventures. Fusient will take over all day-to-day operations of WCW,
with Bedol as the new CEO. Bischoff, who helped build the WCW 
franchise into a ratings powerhouse during the mid-90s, will 
assume the role of president.
The partnership of Bedol, Greenberg and Bischoff brings together 
more than 50 years of combined experience in the entertainment, 
television and sports industries.
"We're going to reestablish the WCW as the champion of 
professional wrestling entertainment," said Brian Bedol, chief 
executive officer of WCW Incorporated. "There is huge untapped 
potential for the franchise and with Eric Bischoff on board we 
will crank everything up to make the WCW franchise even bigger, 
better, stronger and more entertaining than anything wrestling 
fans have ever experienced before."
"We are pleased to have reached an agreement with Fusient Media 
Ventures that truly represents a win for all parties," said 
Bradley J. Siegel, president of general entertainment networks, 
TBS, Inc. "The Fusient management team's experience in 
programming, production and marketing at Classic Sports Network 
lends itself perfectly to the WCW business. Their entrepreneurial 
business-building expertise, combined with the powerhouse brands 
and distribution that TBS Superstation and TNT provide, will be a
winning combination."
The broad-based WCW franchise includes WCW Monday Nitro Live 
(TNT), one of the most popular programs on cable television; WCW 
Thunder (TBS Superstation), one of the network's most watched 
programs; WCW Worldwide, seen in syndication in 94% of the 
country; and 12 monthly pay-per-view specials that consistently 
are among the industry's top sellers.
"Wrestling fans can rest assured that we will give the WCW the 
adrenaline shot it needs to once again become the most exciting 
brand of wrestling in the world," said Eric Bischoff.
Bischoff began his career with the WCW in the early 1990s as an 
on-air announcer and rose through the ranks to become president of 
the company. Under his leadership, WCW became the top-rated 
wrestling franchise on television, an accomplishment that lasted 
for 96 weeks.
           About World Championship Wrestling
World Championship Wrestling (WCW), a division of Turner 
Broadcasting System, Inc., is an industry leader in creating live 
action-based entertainment for millions of enthusiastic fans each 
week.
            About Fusient Media Ventures
Fusient Media Ventures is focused on identifying, funding, 
developing and distributing next generation content and converged 
media brands. The company is headquartered in New York, with 
offices in Los Angeles.
ZENITH ELECTRONICS: TMA Honors Successful Turnaround Team
---------------------------------------------------------
When Zenith Electronics Corporation, America's last fully 
integrated TV manufacturer, faced $500 million of debt and an 
operating loss of almost $300 million late in 1997, it called on a 
team of well-known restructuring practitioners. Their plan 
resulted in Zenith's trimming its operating loss to $5.1 million 
in 1999 while maintaining a revenue level of about $1billion, and 
Zenith's successful emergence from Chapter 11 on Nov. 5, 1999.
The new Zenith is a consumer electronics leader focusing on brand,
distribution and technology and well positioned to participate in 
the TV industry's transition to digital TV and HDTV by sourcing 
product from companies such as its parent, LG Electronics.
This Chicago-based team will be honored with the Chicago/Midwest 
Chapter of Turnaround Management Association (TMA) "Most Effective 
Restructure of a Company within a Chapter 11 Reorganization" Award 
at a breakfast forum Friday, Jan. 12 at 7:45 a.m. at the Mid-Day 
Club in Bank One Plaza, 10 South Dearborn, 56th Floor, Chicago. 
Panelists from the team will speak at 8:15 a.m. on how they 
overcome the legal challenges and opposition in carrying
out a prepackaged plan that called for eliminating all of its 
publicly held common stock. The speakers include:
-- Duncan Bourne, senior associate, and James A. Mesterharm, 
   principal, at Jay Alix & Associates, a turnaround management 
   firm
-- Matthew N. Kleiman, Partner, at Kirkland & Ellis, a legal firm
-- Thomas Halsch, vice president/senior transactor, from Citibank 
   Structured Products Group
Other members of the turnaround team include Bob Dangremond and 
Jan Ciancanelli from Jay Alix & Associates and Jamie Sprayregen 
from Kirkland & Ellis.
The Chicago/Midwest Chapter, with nearly 400 members, is one of 
the largest TMA chapters. The Turnaround Management Association 
(http://www.turnaround.org),headquartered in Chicago, is the only 
international nonprofit association dedicated to the development 
of a stronger economy through corporate renewal. TMA has 32 
chapters worldwide, with a membership of 4,100, who include 
financial advisors, turnaround managers, lenders, attorneys, and 
judicial and government personnel who participate in corporate 
financial turnarounds and restructuring.
* Bond pricing for the week of January 16, 2001
---------------------------------------------- 
Following are indicated prices for selected issues: 
AMC Ent 9 1/2 '09                66 - 69 
Amresco 9 7/8 '05                54 - 56 
Asia Pulp & Paper 11 3/4 '05     36 - 38 
Chiquita 9 5/8 '04               48 - 50 
Conseco 9 '06                    82 - 84 
Federal Mogul 7 1/2 '04          29 - 31 
Globalstar 11 3/8 '04            10 - 12 
Oakwood Homes 7 7/8 '04          35 - 38 
Owens Corning 7 1/2 '05          26 - 28(f) 
PSI Net 11 '09                   33 - 36 
Pacific G & E 6 1/4 '04          84 - 86 
Revlon 8 5/8 '08                 48 - 51 
Saks 7 '04                       77 - 79 
Sterling Chemical 11 3/4 '06     50 - 52 
Teligent 11 1/2 '07              16 - 18 
Tenneco 11 5/8 '09               56 - 58 
TWA 12 '02                       77 - 80(f) 
                           *********
Bond pricing, appearing in each Monday's edition of the TCR, is 
provided by DLS Capital Partners in Dallas, Texas.
A list of Meetings, Conferences and Seminars appears in each 
Wednesday's edition of the TCR. Submissions about insolvency-
related conferences are encouraged. Send announcements to 
conferences@bankrupt.com. 
Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of 
interest to troubled company professionals. All titles available 
from Amazon.com -- go to 
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/189312214X/internetbankrupt 
-- or through your local bookstore. 
For copies of court documents filed in the District of Delaware, 
please contact Vito at Parcels, Inc., at 302-658-9911. For 
bankruptcy documents filed in cases pending outside the District 
of Delaware, contact Ken Troubh at Nationwide Research & 
Consulting at 207/791-2852.
                           *********
S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N
Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published by 
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Trenton, NJ USA, and Beard 
Group, Inc., Washington, DC USA. Debra Brennan, Yvonne L. Metzler, 
May Guangko, Aileen Quijano, Peter A. Chapman, Editors. 
Copyright 2001.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.
This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or 
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic 
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior 
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained 
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is 
not guaranteed.
The TCR subscription rate is $575 for 6 months delivered via e-
mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm 
for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof are 
$25 each.  For subscription information, contact Christopher Beard 
at 301/951-6400.
                     *** End of Transmission ***