260225.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Wednesday, February 25, 2026, Vol. 27, No. 40

                           Headlines



G E R M A N Y

PAPIERFABRIK HAINSBERG: Files for Insolvency for Third Time


I R E L A N D

AVOCA CLO XXXV: Fitch Assigns 'B-(EXP)sf' Rating on Class F Notes


I T A L Y

[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on 4 EMEA Diversified Industrials Cos.


N E T H E R L A N D S

FINANCIERE TOP: Fitch Affirms 'B+' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable


T U R K E Y

MERSIN ULUSLARARASI: Fitch Alters Outlook on BB- Rating to Positive


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

HANX LIMITED : Opus Restructuring Appointed as Joint Administrator
HENRY NUTTALL: Azets Holdings Appointed as Joint Administrators
LP SD 103: Creditors' Virtual Meeting Set for March 3
LP SD 104: Creditors' Virtual Meeting Set for March 3
LP SD 105: Creditors' Virtual Meeting Set for March 3

LP SD 110: Creditors' Virtual Meeting Set for March 3


X X X X X X X X

[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on 4 EMEA Protein & Commodity Trading Cos
[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on Nine Media Ratings Entities
[] Fitch Affirms Seven B+ Rated EMEA Diversified Industrials Cos.

                           - - - - -


=============
G E R M A N Y
=============

PAPIERFABRIK HAINSBERG: Files for Insolvency for Third Time
-----------------------------------------------------------
markku bjorkman of PulpaperNews reports that Papierfabrik
Hainsberg, a paper mill in Hainsberg in the German state of Saxony
has once again entered insolvency proceedings.

It is said to be the company's third time to seek preliminary
insolvency proceedings.

The report notes that the Dresden District Court on February 5,
2026, appointed lawyer Susanne Berner from the law firm Dr Berner &
Partner Rechtsanwalte as provisional insolvency administrator.

Over the coming weeks, she is expected to gain an overview of the
financial situation at the long-established industrial company and
examine possible options to stabilize operations, Pulpaper
relates.

The decision formally places the company in a new insolvency
process, marking another setback for the regional paper industry.
The Hainsberg plant has a long history and has experienced
recurring financial difficulties over the years.

Pulpaper notes that the provisional administrator has been tasked
with analyzing the company's finances, debt situation and
operations.  The aim is to determine whether the business can
continue under restructuring, be sold to a new owner or, in the
worst case, be wound down.

The administrator is also responsible for securing ongoing
operations during the initial phase and holding discussions with
creditors, employees and potential investors.  A key objective in
such proceedings is to find a solution that preserves production
and jobs where possible.

Germany's paper industry has faced mounting pressure in recent
years due to high energy costs, declining demand for certain paper
products and intensifying competition, Pulpaper cites.  Several
mills across the country have already been forced to scale back
production or shut down.

The Hainsberg facility is located in the town of Freital near
Dresden and is one of the older industrial sites in the region. It
remains unclear how many employees will be affected by the current
insolvency, but local authorities and trade unions are closely
monitoring the situation, according to the report.

It is also unclear whether investors will emerge to take over the
business or whether restructuring within the current corporate
structure is possible, Pulpaper says.  The insolvency administrator
is expected to present an initial assessment once the financial
review has been completed.




=============
I R E L A N D
=============

AVOCA CLO XXXV: Fitch Assigns 'B-(EXP)sf' Rating on Class F Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Avoca CLO XXXV DAC expected ratings.

The assignment of final ratings is contingent on the receipt of
final documents conforming to the information already received.

   Entity/Debt              Rating           
   -----------              ------           
Avoca CLO XXXV DAC

   A- 1 XS3286684595     LT AAA(EXP)sf  Expected Rating
   A- 2 XS3286684751     LT AAA(EXP)sf  Expected Rating
   B XS3286684835        LT AA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
   C XS3286684918        LT A(EXP)sf    Expected Rating
   D XS3286685139        LT BBB-(EXP)sf Expected Rating
   E XS3286685212        LT BB-(EXP)sf  Expected Rating
   F XS3286685303        LT B-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
   Subordinated Notes    LT NR(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

Transaction Summary

Avoca CLO XXXV DAC is a securitisation of mainly senior secured
obligations (at least 90%) with a component of senior unsecured,
mezzanine, second-lien loans and high-yield bonds. Note proceeds
will be used to fund a portfolio with a target par of EUR400
million. The portfolio will be actively managed by KKR Credit
Advisors (Ireland) Unlimited Company. The collateralised loan
obligation (CLO) will have a 4.6-year reinvestment period and an
8.6-year weighted average life test (WAL) at closing.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Average Portfolio Credit Quality (Neutral): Fitch assesses the
average credit quality of obligors to be in the 'B' category. The
Fitch weighted average rating factor (WARF) of the identified
portfolio is 24.3.

High Recovery Expectations (Positive): At least 90% of the
portfolio will comprise senior secured obligations. Fitch views the
recovery prospects for these assets as more favourable than for
second-lien, unsecured and mezzanine assets. The Fitch weighted
average recovery rate (WARR) of the identified portfolio is 60.8%.

Diversified Asset Portfolio (Positive): The transaction will
include various concentration limits in the portfolio, including
the top 10 obligor concentration limit of 20% and a maximum
exposure to the three largest Fitch-defined industries in the
portfolio of 40%. These covenants ensure the asset portfolio will
not be exposed to excessive concentration.

Portfolio Management (Neutral): The transaction will have a
reinvestment period of 4.6 years and include reinvestment criteria
similar to those of other European deals. Its analysis is based on
a stressed-case portfolio with the aim of testing the robustness of
the deal structure against its covenants and portfolio guidelines.

Cash Flow Modelling (Neutral): The WAL used for the transaction's
Fitch-stressed portfolio and matrices analysis is 12 months less
than the WAL test covenant at the issue date, accounting for strict
reinvestment conditions after the reinvestment period. These
include the satisfaction of the coverage tests and the Fitch 'CCC'
limitation test, together with a WAL test covenant that gradually
reduces over time. Fitch believes these conditions would reduce the
effective risk horizon of the portfolio during stress periods.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

A 25% increase of the mean default rate (RDR) and a 25% decrease of
the recovery rate (RRR) across all ratings of the identified
portfolio would lead to a downgrade of one notch each for the class
D and E notes and below 'B-sf' for the class F notes. There is no
rating impact on the class A-1 to C notes.

Downgrades, which are based on the identified portfolio, may occur
if the loss expectation is larger than assumed, due to unexpectedly
high levels of default and portfolio deterioration. The class B to
F notes each have a cushion of up to three notches due to the
better metrics and shorter life of the identified portfolio than
the Fitch-stressed portfolio. The class A-1 and A-2 notes have no
rating cushion.

Should the cushion between the identified portfolio and the
Fitch-stressed portfolio be eroded due to manager trading or
negative portfolio credit migration, a 25% increase of the mean RDR
and a 25% decrease of the RRR across all ratings of the
Fitch-stressed portfolio would lead to downgrades of up to five
notches for the notes.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

A 25% reduction of the mean RDR and a 25% increase in the RRR
across all ratings of the Fitch-stressed portfolio would lead to
upgrades of up to four notches each, except for the 'AAAsf' notes.

Upgrades during the reinvestment period, which are based on the
Fitch-stressed portfolio, may occur on better-than-expected
portfolio credit quality and a shorter remaining WAL test, allowing
the notes to withstand larger-than-expected losses for the
transaction's remaining life. Upgrades after the end of the
reinvestment period may result from stable portfolio credit quality
and deleveraging, leading to higher credit enhancement and excess
spread available to cover losses in the remaining portfolio.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

The majority of the underlying assets or risk-presenting entities
have ratings or credit opinions from Fitch and/or other Nationally
Recognised Statistical Rating Organisations and/or European
Securities and Markets Authority-registered rating agencies. Fitch
has relied on the practices of the relevant groups within Fitch
and/or other rating agencies to assess the asset portfolio
information or information on the risk-presenting entities.

Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above,
Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the rating
agency's rating analysis according to its applicable rating
methodologies indicates that it is adequately reliable.

ESG Considerations

Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores for Avoca CLO XXXV
DAC.

In cases where Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores in
connection with the credit rating of a transaction, programme,
instrument or issuer, Fitch will disclose any ESG factor that is a
key rating driver in the key rating drivers section of the relevant
rating action commentary.




=========
I T A L Y
=========

[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on 4 EMEA Diversified Industrials Cos.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed 4 EMEA diversified industrials
companies' ratings.

  1. TK Elevator Holdco GmbH
  2. Omnia Technologies S.p.A.
  3. CEME S.p.A.
  4. Dynamo Midco B.V. (Innomotics)

These actions follow the update of Fitch's Corporate Rating
Criteria and the Sector Navigators - Addendum to the Corporate
Rating Criteria on January 9, 2026. The companies' ratings and
Outlooks are unaffected by the criteria changes.

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

TK Elevator Holdco GmbH

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb+, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bbb+,
Higher), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb+, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb-, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb-, Moderate), Profitability (bb-,
Moderate), Financial Structure (ccc+, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (b, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on standard CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the historical year
2024, 40% for the forecast year 2025 and 40% for the forecast year
2026.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

To derive the IDR: no other considerations were applied.

Omnia Technologies S.p.A.

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb-, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bbb-,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb+, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb+, Moderate), Profitability (bb-,
Moderate), Financial Structure (ccc+, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (b+, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 10% weight for the historical year
2024, 30% for the forecast year 2025, 30% for the forecast year
2026 and 30% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Some Deficiencies' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

To derive the IDR: no other consideration applied.

CEME S.p.A.

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb-, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bb+, Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb-, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb-, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (b+, Moderate), Profitability (bbb,
Moderate), Financial Structure (ccc+, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (b+, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 10% weight for the historical year
2024, 40% for the forecast year 2025, 30% for the forecast year
2026 and 20% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance Impact assessment of 'Good' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment Impact assessment of 'a' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

To derive the IDR: no other consideration applied.

Dynamo Midco B.V. (Innomotics)

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (b+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bb+, Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb-,
Moderate), Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb-, Lower), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb+, Moderate), Profitability (b-,
Higher), Financial Structure (b, Higher), and Financial Flexibility
(b+, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 40% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 20% for the forecast year 2027.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

To derive the IDR: no other consideration applied.

RATING ACTIONS

   Entity/Debt               Rating           Recovery   Prior
   -----------               ------           --------   -----
CEME S.p.A.            

                       LT IDR B  Affirmed                B
   senior secured      LT     B  Affirmed      RR4       B

Dynamo Newco II GmbH

   senior secured      LT     B+ Affirmed      RR3       B+

TK Elevator Holdco GmbH        

                       LT IDR B  Affirmed                B

Dynamo Midco B.V.   

                       LT IDR B  Affirmed                B

Dynamo US Bidco Inc.

   senior secured      LT     B+ Affirmed      RR3       B+

TK Elevator U.S.
Newco, Inc.

   senior secured      LT     B  Affirmed      RR4       B

Omnia Technologies S.p.A.

                       LT IDR B  Affirmed                B
   senior secured      LT     B  Affirmed      RR4       B

TK Elevator Midco GmbH

   senior secured      LT     B  Affirmed      RR4       B




=====================
N E T H E R L A N D S
=====================

FINANCIERE TOP: Fitch Affirms 'B+' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Financiere Top Mendel SAS's Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B+'. The Outlook is Stable. Fitch
has also affirmed the senior secured rating at 'BB-' with a
Recovery Rating of 'RR3' on the term loan B (TLB), the US dollar
tranche of which is co-issued by Financiere Mendel S.A.S. and
Mendel US Holding LLC.

These actions follow the update of Fitch's Corporate Rating
Criteria and the Sector Navigators - Addendum to the Corporate
Rating Criteria on January 9, 2026.

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

The business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance) are management ('bb+', moderate), sector
characteristics ('bbb+', lower), market and competitive positioning
('b+', higher), diversification and asset quality ('bbb',
moderate), company operational characteristics ('bbb', moderate),
profitability ('bbb-', moderate), financial structure ('b', higher)
and financial flexibility ('bb-', moderate).

The quantitative financial subfactors are based on standard CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the historical year
FY24, 40% for the forecast year FY25 and 40% for the forecast year
FY26.

B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.
The governance assessment of 'good' results in no adjustment.

The operating environment assessment of 'a' results in no
adjustment.

The SCP is 'b+'.

RATING ACTIONS

   Entity/Debt                  Rating          Recovery   Prior
   -----------                  ------          --------   -----
Financiere Mendel S.A.S.

   senior secured        LT      BB-  Affirmed    RR3        BB-

Financiere Top Mendel SAS

                         LT IDR  B+   Affirmed               B+

Mendel US Holding LLC

   senior secured        LT      BB-  Affirmed    RR3        BB-




===========
T U R K E Y
===========

MERSIN ULUSLARARASI: Fitch Alters Outlook on BB- Rating to Positive
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has revised Mersin Uluslararasi Liman Isletmeciligi
A.S.'s USD600 million senior unsecured notes' Outlook to Positive
from Stable and affirmed the rating at 'BB-'. This follows the
revision of the Outlook on Turkiye's sovereign ratings. Mersin's
rating remains constrained by Turkiye's 'BB-' Country Ceiling and
aligned with the sovereign ratings due to the port's linkages to
the country's economic and regulatory environment.

RATING RATIONALE

The rating reflects Mersin's dominant market position in its
catchment area, its location and strong connectivity to its
industrial hinterland and its diversified goods mix, which mitigate
the volatility of its domestic and export markets. Its weak,
single-bullet debt structure weighs on the rating, although the
refinancing risk associated with the bullet bond is largely
mitigated by its moderate leverage.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Revenue Risk - Volume - Midrange

Industrial Hinterland, Macroeconomic Volatility: Mersin is
Turkiye's largest export-import port and its largest container
port. The volume mix is diversified and balanced between imports
and exports, but volatile. The port benefits from an industrial
hinterland and has annual container and conventional cargo capacity
of 2.6 million 20-foot equivalent unit (TEUs) and 10 million tons,
respectively. Mersin has lost some of its market share since 2015
to its main competitor, Limak Iskenderun Uluslararasi Liman
Isletmeciligi A.S., due to the latter's competitive rates. Mersin
had a market share of just over 70% in 1H25.

Revenue Risk - Price - Midrange

Unregulated US Dollar Tariffs: Mersin's concession allows for
considerable pricing flexibility, subject to restrictions on
excessive or discriminatory pricing. While these restrictions have
not been enforced historically, there may now be increased
government oversight or constraints on tariff increases, though
Mersin has historically been able to adjust tariffs. The typical
contract length with Mersin's customers is, on average, short at
one-to-two years, and includes volume-related incentives.

Mersin's fees are almost 100% set and largely paid in US dollars.
The remaining local-currency payments are settled weekly in
dollars, so depreciation of the Turkish lira does not have a direct
impact on Mersin's tariffs. Most operational expenses are
lira-denominated, and Mersin has successfully passed on increased
costs of operations in inflationary periods to customers through
tariff adjustments. However, the operating margin continued to
decline in 2024 due to inflationary pressures. Fitch has considered
these factors in the rating case.

Infrastructure Dev. & Renewal - Midrange

Extensive Investment Plan: Mersin's current container handling
capacity is 2.6 million TEUs. After the completion of its EMH Phase
I in 2016, it began constructing EMH II, which is scheduled to be
completed in 2026. EMH II will further enhance the company's
competitiveness in the region and increase container handling
capacity to 3.6 million TEUs. Management expects additional
capacity from this expansion to reach 100% in 2026.

Debt Structure - 1 - Weaker

Refinancing Risk, Unsecured Debt: Mersin issued a five-year 8.5%
yield (coupon 8.25%) USD600 million US dollar-denominated bullet
bond in 2023 to refinance its existing USD600 million outstanding
debt. No material covenants protect debt holders, apart from a 3.0x
net debt/EBITDA incurrence-based covenant. The senior debt does not
benefit from a security package.

Financial Profile

Under Fitch's rating case, projected net debt/EBITDA will average
about 2.0x between 2025 and 2029. Leverage is low, but Mersin's
rating is constrained by Turkiye's Country Ceiling and aligned with
the sovereign ratings.

PEER GROUP

Mersin's main peer is Limak Iskenderun Uluslararasi Liman
Isletmeciligi A.S. (B-/Negative), which also operates in the
eastern Mediterranean. Limak is an export-import-oriented port with
lower tariffs than Mersin due to its need to compete on price
versus bigger ports in the region, including Mersin. Limak's debt
structure is fully amortising compared with Mersin's bullet debt
structure, so it is not exposed to refinancing risk.

Limak's operations were temporarily halted after the earthquake hit
Turkiye in February 2023, before partially resuming in April of the
same year. As of now, Limak is operating at 80% of its total port
capacity. Limak's lower rating and Negative Outlook reflect the
continued reliance of debt sustainability on sustained, material
volume growth, particularly given ongoing uncertainty arising from
Red Sea disruptions.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- Negative action on Turkiye's sovereign ratings and Country
Ceiling

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- Positive action on Turkiye's sovereign ratings and Country
Ceiling

Climate Vulnerability Signals

The results of its Climate.VS screener did not indicate an elevated
risk for Mersin.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt                       Rating           Prior
   -----------                       ------           -----
Mersin Uluslararasi
Liman Isletmeciligi A.S.

   Mersin Uluslararasi
   Liman Isletmeciligi A.S./
   Project Revenues - Senior
   Secured Debt/1 LT              LT

   USD 600 mln 8.25% bond/note
   15-Nov-2028 590454AC8          LT BB-  Affirmed    BB-




===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

HANX LIMITED : Opus Restructuring Appointed as Joint Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
Hanx Limited, was placed into administration in the High Court of
Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales,
Insolvency & Companies List (ChD), Court Number CR-2026-000789.
Mark Siddall (IP No. 028890) and Bradley Parrott (IP No. 31750),
both of Opus Restructuring LLP were appointed as Joint
Administrators on February 12, 2026.

The company engaged in manufacturing; retail sale in
non-specialised stores; retail sale of medical and orthopaedic
goods in specialised stores (not including hearing aids); and
retail sale via mail order houses or via Internet.

The company's registered office and principal trading address is at
Office 7, 35–37 Ludgate Hill, London, EC4M 7JN.

The Joint Administrators are:

     Mark Siddall (IP No. 028890)
     Bradley Parrott (IP No. 31750)
     Opus Restructuring LLP
     1 Radian Court, Knowlhill
     Milton Keynes MK5 8PJ

For further details, contact:

     The Joint Administrators
     Tel: 01908 752942
     Alternative contact: Kathryn Smith


HENRY NUTTALL: Azets Holdings Appointed as Joint Administrators
---------------------------------------------------------------
Henry Nuttall Limited, was placed into administration in the High
Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in Leeds, Insolvency
and Companies List (ChD), Court Number CR-2026-000120.  Richard
Oddy (IP No. 26330) and Jonathan Mark Amor (IP No. 017770), both of
Azets Holdings Limited, were appointed as Joint Administrators on
February 6, 2026.

The company engaged in manufacturing.

The company's registered office and principal trading address is
Unit 2b Manor Drive, Dinnington, S25 3QU.

The Joint Administrators are:

     Richard Oddy (IP No. 26330)
     Jonathan Mark Amor (IP No. 017770)
     Azets Holdings Limited
     12 King Street
     Leeds LS1 2HL

For further details, contact:

     The Joint Administrators
     Tel: 0161 245 1000
     Alternative contact: Araminta Taylor
     Email: araminta.taylor@Azets.co.uk



LP SD 103: Creditors' Virtual Meeting Set for March 3
-----------------------------------------------------
Martin C Armstrong and Andrew Richard Bailey of Turpin Barker
Armstrong, Joint Administrators of LP SD One Hundred Three Limited,
disclosed that a virtual meeting of the creditors of the Company
will be held by conference call on March 3, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.

LP SD One Hundred Three Limited (Company Number 15074580) was
placed in administration proceedings in the High Court of Justice,
Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, Insolvency &
Companies List (ChD), Court Number: CR-2025-007825, on Nov. 6,
2025.

The purpose of the March 3 meeting is to seek resolutions approving
the Joint Administrators' pre-administration costs and to fix the
basis of the Joint Administrators' remuneration.

In order for their votes to be counted, creditors must attend the
virtual meeting and vote either personally or by proxy, and must
also have submitted proof of their debt (if not already lodged)
at:

     Turpin Barker Armstrong
     Allen House
     1 Westmead Road
     Sutton SM1 4LA

by no later than 4 p.m. on March 2, 2026 and their proxy in advance
of the meeting. Failure to do so will lead to their vote(s) being
disregarded.

The Joint Administrators can be reached at:

     Martin C Armstrong
     Andrew Richard Bailey
     Turpin Barker Armstrong
     Allen House
     1 Westmead Road
     Sutton, Surrey SM1 4LA

For further details, contact:

     Tel No: 0208 661 4005
     Email: jhoots.creditors@turpinba.co.uk



LP SD 104: Creditors' Virtual Meeting Set for March 3
-----------------------------------------------------
Martin C Armstrong and Andrew Richard Bailey of Turpin Barker
Armstrong, Joint Administrators of LP SD One Hundred Four Limited,
disclosed that a virtual meeting of the creditors of the Company
will be held by conference call on March 3, 2026 at 10:15 a.m.

LP SD One Hundred Four Limited (Company Number 15075091) was placed
in administration proceedings in the High Court of Justice,
Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, Insolvency &
Companies List (ChD), Court Number: CR-2025-007833, on Nov. 6,
2025.

The purpose of the March 3 meeting is to seek resolutions approving
the Joint Administrators' pre-administration costs and to fix the
basis of the Joint Administrators' remuneration.

In order for their votes to be counted, creditors must attend the
virtual meeting and vote either personally or by proxy, and must
also have submitted proof of their debt (if not already lodged)
at:

     Turpin Barker Armstrong
     Allen House
     1 Westmead Road
     Sutton SM1 4LA

by no later than 4:00 p.m. on March 2, 2026 and their proxy in
advance of the meeting. Failure to do so will lead to their vote(s)
being disregarded.

The Joint Administrators can be reached at:

     Martin C Armstrong
     Andrew Richard Bailey
     Turpin Barker Armstrong
     Allen House
     1 Westmead Road
     Sutton, Surrey SM1 4LA

For further details, contact:

     Tel No: 0208 661 4005
     Email: jhoots.creditors@turpinba.co.uk


LP SD 105: Creditors' Virtual Meeting Set for March 3
-----------------------------------------------------
Martin C Armstrong and Andrew Richard Bailey of Turpin Barker
Armstrong, Joint Administrators of LP SD One Hundred Five Limited,
disclosed that a virtual meeting of the creditors of the Company
will be held by conference call on March 3, 2026 at 10.30 a.m.

LP SD One Hundred Five Limited (Company Number 15075074) was placed
in administration proceedings in the High Court of Justice,
Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, Insolvency &
Companies List (ChD), Court Number: CR-2025-007832, on Nov. 6,
2025.

The purpose of the March 3 meeting is to seek resolutions approving
the Joint Administrators' pre-administration costs and to fix the
basis of the Joint Administrators' remuneration.

In order for their votes to be counted, creditors must attend the
virtual meeting and vote either personally or by proxy, and must
also have submitted proof of their debt (if not already lodged)
at:

     Turpin Barker Armstrong
     Allen House
     1 Westmead Road
     Sutton SM1 4LA

by no later than 4 p.m. on March 2, 2026 and their proxy in advance
of the meeting. Failure to do so will lead to their vote(s) being
disregarded.

The Joint Administrators can be reached at:

     Martin C Armstrong
     Andrew Richard Bailey
     Turpin Barker Armstrong
     Allen House
     1 Westmead Road
     Sutton, Surrey SM1 4LA

For further details, contact:

     Tel No: 0208 661 4005
     Email: jhoots.creditors@turpinba.co.uk


LP SD 110: Creditors' Virtual Meeting Set for March 3
-----------------------------------------------------
Martin C Armstrong and Andrew Richard Bailey of Turpin Barker
Armstrong, Joint Administrators of LP SD One Hundred Ten Limited,
disclosed that a virtual meeting of the creditors of the Company
will be held by conference call on March 3, 2026 at 10:45 a.m.

LP SD One Hundred Ten Limited (Company Number 15075096) was placed
in administration proceedings in the High Court of Justice,
Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, Insolvency &
Companies List (ChD), Court Number: CR-2025-007828, on Nov. 6,
2025.

The purpose of the March 3 meeting is to seek resolutions approving
the Joint Administrators' pre-administration costs and to fix the
basis of the Joint Administrators' remuneration.

In order for their votes to be counted, creditors must attend the
virtual meeting and vote either personally or by proxy, and must
also have submitted proof of their debt (if not already lodged)
at:

     Turpin Barker Armstrong
     Allen House
     1 Westmead Road
     Sutton SM1 4LA

by no later than 4:00 p.m. on March 2, 2026 and their proxy in
advance of the meeting. Failure to do so will lead to their vote(s)
being disregarded.

The Joint Administrators can be reached at:

     Martin C Armstrong
     Andrew Richard Bailey
     Turpin Barker Armstrong
     Allen House
     1 Westmead Road
     Sutton, Surrey SM1 4LA

For further details, contact:

     Tel No: 0208 661 4005
     Email: jhoots.creditors@turpinba.co.uk




===============
X X X X X X X X
===============

[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on 4 EMEA Protein & Commodity Trading Cos
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed 4 EMEA protein, commodity processing and
trading companies' ratings and their associated entities:

  1. Bering III S.a r.l.
  2. Boparan Holdings Limited
  3. Kernel Holding S.A.
  4. Aragvi Holding International Limited

These actions follow the update of Fitch's Corporate Rating
Criteria and the Sector Navigators - Addendum to the Corporate
Rating Criteria on January 9, 2026. The companies' ratings and
Outlooks are unaffected by the criteria changes.

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Bering III S.a r.l.

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bbb, Lower), Market and Competitive Positioning (b, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (b+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb+, Moderate), Profitability (bbb-,
Moderate), Financial Structure (b-, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (b, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the historical year
2024, 20% for the forecast year 2025, 20% for the forecast year
2026, 20% for the forecast year 2027 and 20% for the forecast year
2028.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Some Deficiencies' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'bb' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

Boparan Holdings Limited

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb-,
Lower), Market and Competitive Positioning (b, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (b, Higher), Company Operational
Characteristics (b+, Moderate), Profitability (bb-, Higher),
Financial Structure (bb, Moderate), and Financial Flexibility (bb-,
Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on standard CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the historical year
2025 (fiscal year ending July 2025), 40% for the forecast year 2026
and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

Kernel Holding S.A.

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb-, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (b+, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb+, Lower), Profitability (bbb-,
Lower), Financial Structure (bb, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (ccc, Higher).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 30% weight for the historical year
2025 (fiscal year ending June 2025), 30% for the forecast year
2026, 30% for the forecast year 2027 and 10% for the forecast year
2028.

- The Financial Flexibility factor is considered the weakest link
in its analysis. This leads to an adjustment of -1 notch(es).

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in an
adjustment of -1 notch(es).

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'b' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'ccc-'.

Aragvi Holding International Limited

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb-, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bb, Lower), Market and Competitive Positioning (b, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb-, Higher), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb, Moderate), Profitability (bb+,
Moderate), Financial Structure (bb, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (bb, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 10% weight for the historical year
2025 (fiscal year ending June 2025), 40% for the forecast year
2026, 30% for the forecast year 2027 and 20% for the forecast year
2028.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Some Deficiencies' results in an
adjustment of -1 notch(es).

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'bb' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

RATING ACTIONS

   Entity/Debt            Rating             Recovery   Prior
   -----------            ------             --------   -----
Kernel Holding S.A.

                    LT IDR    CCC-     Affirmed           CCC-
                    LC LT IDR CCC-     Affirmed           CCC-
                    Natl LT   CCC-(ukr)Affirmed           CCC-(ukr)

  senior unsecured  LT        CCC-     Affirmed   RR4     CCC-

Bering III S.a r.l.      

                    LT IDR    B        Affirmed            B

Boparan Holdings
Limited      

                    LT IDR    B+       Affirmed            B+

Aragvi Finance
International DAC

  senior secured    LT        B+       Affirmed   RR4      B+

Aragvi Holding
International Limited         

                    LT IDR    B+       Affirmed            B+
                    LC LT IDR B+       Affirmed            B+

Boparan Finance plc

  senior secured    LT        B+       Affirmed   RR4      B+


[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on Nine Media Ratings Entities
-------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed nine media ratings and their associated
entities:

  1. AVIV Group GmbH
  2. Banijay S.A.S.
  3. Delta Topco Limited
  4. ITV plc
  5. Mediawan Holding SAS
  6. Pearson plc
  7. S4 Capital plc
  8. Speedster Bidco GmbH
  9. The Stepstone Group Holding GmbH

These actions follow the update of Fitch's Corporate Rating
Criteria and the Sector Navigators - Addendum to the Corporate
Rating Criteria on  January 9, 2026. The companies' ratings and
Outlooks are unaffected by the criteria changes.

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

AVIV Group GmbH

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (b+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bbb, Lower), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb+, Moderate), Profitability (a-,
Lower), Financial Structure (b, Higher), and Financial Flexibility
(b+, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

Banijay S.A.S.

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (b+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bbb-, Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb+,
Moderate), Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb, Lower), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb-, Moderate), Profitability (bb,
Moderate), Financial Structure (b-, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (b+, Higher).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on standard CRT
financial period parameters: 20% for the forecast year 2025, 40%
for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

To derive the IDR of 'B+':

- Application of Fitch's Parent Subsidiary Linkage Considerations
Rating Criteria results in a bottom up +1 approach.

Delta Topco Limited

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bbb, Lower), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb+, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb, Higher), Company Operational
Characteristics (bbb-, Moderate), Profitability (bbb+, Lower),
Financial Structure (bb, Higher), and Financial Flexibility (bb+,
Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bb'.

ITV plc

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb+,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb-, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb+, Higher), Profitability (bb,
Higher), Financial Structure (a, Higher), and Financial Flexibility
(bbb-, Higher).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bbb-'.

Mediawan Holding SAS

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (b+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bb+, Lower), Market and Competitive Positioning (b+, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Lower), Company Operational
Characteristics (bb, Moderate), Profitability (bb-, Moderate),
Financial Structure (b, Higher), and Financial Flexibility (b+,
Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in an
adjustment of -1 notch.

- The Governance assessment of 'Some Deficiencies' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

Pearson plc

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bbb,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (a, Lower), Profitability (bbb+,
Higher), Financial Structure (a+, Lower), and Financial Flexibility
(a-, Lower).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bbb'.

S4 Capital plc

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (b+, Lower), Sector Characteristics (b+,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (b, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (b+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (b+, Higher), Profitability (b+,
Higher), Financial Structure (bb, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (bb-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on standard CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the historical year
2024, 40% for the forecast year 2025 and 40% for the forecast year
2026.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

Speedster Bidco GmbH

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (b+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bbb+, Lower), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb+, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb, Moderate), Profitability (a-,
Lower), Financial Structure (ccc+, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (b+, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

The Stepstone Group Holding GmbH

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (b+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics (b+,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb-, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb, Lower), Profitability (bbb+,
Lower), Financial Structure (b-, Higher), and Financial Flexibility
(b, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

RATING ACTIONS

   Entity/Debt               Rating            Recovery   Prior
   -----------               ------            --------   -----
Pearson Plc        

                       LT IDR BBB  Affirmed               BBB
   senior unsecured    LT     BBB  Affirmed               BBB

Delta Topco Limited  

                       LT IDR BB   Affirmed               BB

Banijay S.A.S.       

                       LT IDR B+   Affirmed               B+

The Stepstone Group
US Co-Borrower LLC

   senior secured      LT     B+   Affirmed     RR3       B+

Mediawan
Financing SAS

   senior secured      LT     B+   Affirmed     RR3       B+

Mediawan Holding SAS

                       LT IDR B    Affirmed               B

The Stepstone Group
MidCo 2 GmbH

   senior secured      LT     B+   Affirmed     RR3       B+

Pearson Funding Plc

   senior unsecured    LT     BBB  Affirmed               BBB

S4 Capital plc       

                       LT IDR B+   Affirmed               B+

AVIV Group GmbH      

                       LT IDR B+   Affirmed               B+
   senior secured      LT     BB-  Affirmed     RR3       BB-

Banijay
Entertainment SAS

   senior secured      LT     BB-  Affirmed     RR3       BB-

ITV plc           

                       LT IDR BBB- Affirmed               BBB-
                       ST IDR F3   Affirmed               F3
   senior unsecured    LT     BBB- Affirmed               BBB-

Speedster Bidco GmbH

                       LT IDR B    Affirmed               B
   senior secured      LT     B+   Affirmed     RR3       B+

The Stepstone Group
Holding GmbH       

                       LT IDR B    Affirmed               B

Banijay Group US
Holding, Inc.

   senior secured      LT     BB-  Affirmed     RR3       BB-

S4 Capital LUX
Finance S.a r.l.

   senior secured      LT     B+   Affirmed     RR4       B+

Delta 2 (Lux) S.a r.l.

   senior secured      LT     BB+  Affirmed     RR2       BB+


[] Fitch Affirms Seven B+ Rated EMEA Diversified Industrials Cos.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed seven 'B+' rated EMEA diversified
industrials companies' ratings:

  1. Arcelik A.S.
  2. ADB Safegate Luxembourg Finco S.à r.l. (ADB)
  3. Purmo Group Holdings Limited (Purmo)
  4. INNIO Holding GmbH (INNIO)
  5. Protect Holdco GmbH (Uvex)
  6. Ahlstrom Oyj (Ahlstrom)
  7. Umami Bidco S.a r.l.

These actions follow the update of Fitch's Corporate Rating
Criteria and the Sector Navigators - Addendum to the Corporate
Rating Criteria on January 9, 2026. The companies' ratings and
Outlooks are unaffected by the criteria changes.

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

Arcelik

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb+, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb+,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb-, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb-, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb+, Moderate), Profitability (b,
Moderate), Financial Structure (ccc+, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (b, Higher).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'bbb-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

To derive the IDR: no other consideration applied.

ADB

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bbb-, Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb+,
Moderate), Diversification and Asset Quality (b, Higher), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb+, Moderate), Profitability (bbb+,
Moderate), Financial Structure (b, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (bb-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on standard CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the latest historical
year 2024, 40% for the forecast year 2025 and 40% for the forecast
year 2026.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Some Deficiencies' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

To derive the IDR: no other consideration applied.

Purmo

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb-, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb+,
Higher), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb-, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb-, Moderate), Profitability (bb+,
Moderate), Financial Structure (b, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (bb-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the historical year
2024, 30% for the forecast year 2025, 30% for the forecast year
2026 and 20% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Some Deficiencies' results in an
adjustment of -1 notch.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

To derive the IDR: no other consideration applied.

INNIO

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (b+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bbb+, Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb+,
Moderate), Diversification and Asset Quality (bb, Higher), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb, Moderate), Profitability (a+,
Lower), Financial Structure (b+, Higher), and Financial Flexibility
(bb, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on standard CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the historical year
2024, 40% for the forecast year 2025 and 40% for the forecast year
2026.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in an
adjustment of -1 notch.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'

To derive the IDR: no other consideration applied.

Uvex

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bbb-,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (b+, Higher), Profitability (bbb-,
Moderate), Financial Structure (b+, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (bb+, Lower).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 10% weight for the forecast year 2025,
30% for the forecast year 2026, 30% for the forecast year 2027 and
30% for the forecast year 2028.

- Weakest link considerations adjustment is applied based on
company operational characteristics factor and results in an
adjustment of -1 notch.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Some Deficiencies' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

To derive the IDR: no other considerations apply.

Ahlstrom

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (b+, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bbb,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb-, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb+, Moderate), Profitability (bbb,
Moderate), Financial Structure (b-, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (b+, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 10% weight for the historical year
2024, 10% for the forecast year 2025, 40% for the forecast year
2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

To derive the IDR: no other considerations apply.

Umami Bidco S.a r.l.

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bbb-,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (b+, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (b+, Moderate), Profitability (a+,
Lower), Financial Structure (b, Higher), and Financial Flexibility
(bb-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Some Deficiencies' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

To derive the IDR: no other considerations apply.

RATING ACTIONS

   Entity/Debt                 Rating          Recovery   Prior
   -----------                 ------          --------   -----
Protect Bidco GmbH

   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

Ahlstrom Oyj       

                      LT IDR    B+  Affirmed              B+
   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

Spa US Holdco, Inc.

   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

ADB Safegate Sweden AB

   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

Umami Bidco S.a r.l.

                      LT IDR    B+  Affirmed              B+
   senior secured     LT        BB- Affirmed    RR3       BB-

ADB Safegate Germany
Verwaltungs GmbH

   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

Arcelik A.S.

                      LT IDR    B+  Affirmed              B+
                      LC LT IDR B+  Affirmed              B+
                      Natl LT A+(tur)Affirmed             A+(tur)
   senior unsecured   LT        B   Affirmed    RR5       B

INNIO Group Holding GmbH

   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

Purmo Group Holdings Limited  

                      LT IDR    B+  Affirmed              B+

INNIO North
America Holding Inc.

   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

Project Grand (UK) Plc

   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

ADB Safegate Luxembourg
Finco S.a r.l.   

                      LT IDR    B+  Affirmed              B+
   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

ADB Safegate
Americas 1 Inc.

   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

INNIO Holding GmbH

                      LT IDR    B+  Affirmed              B+
   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

INNIO Beteiligungs GmbH

   senior secured     LT        B+  Affirmed    RR4       B+

Protect Holdco GmbH

                      LT IDR    B+  Affirmed              B+



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2026.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *