260219.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Thursday, February 19, 2026, Vol. 27, No. 36

                           Headlines



F R A N C E

[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on Three EMEA Bldg Products Companies


I R E L A N D

EUROMAX V ABS: Fitch Lowers Rating on Class A2 Notes to 'BB-sf'


N E T H E R L A N D S

DARLING GLOBAL: Fitch Affirms BB+ Senior Unsecured Rating


S W I T Z E R L A N D

TRANSOCEAN LTD: Agrees to Acquire Valaris in $5.8B All-Stock Merger


T U R K E Y

ANADOLU SIGORTA: Fitch Alters Ratings Outlook to Positive


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

A.L.N. CARPENTRY: Exigen Group Named as Administrators
CRENOON LIMITED: Currie Young Named as Administrators
MARKET PARENT: Fitch Alters Outlook on 'B' LongTerm IDR to Stable
ORIFLAME INVESTMENT: Fitch Affirms CCC IDR & Then Withdraws Rating
PAN MARKETING: Kreston Reeves Named as Administrators

SENAPT ASSETS: FTS Recovery Named as Administrators
SPARK MEDICAL: RSM UK Named as Administrators
THREE SIXTY: Leonard Curtis Named as Administrators
TROJAN ENERGY: Interpath Advisory Named as Administrators
WESTMONT SYSTEMS: Anderson Anderson Named as Administrators



X X X X X X X X

[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on 3 EMEA Bldg Product Distribution Cos.
[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on Four EMEA Packaged Food Companies

                           - - - - -


===========
F R A N C E
===========

[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on Three EMEA Bldg Products Companies
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed three EMEA building products companies'
ratings and maintained a fourth (Victoria Plc) on Rating Watch
Negative:

  1. Kingspan Group Plc
  2. Tarkett Participation
  3. Hestiafloor 2 (Gerflor)
  4. Victoria Plc

These actions follow the update of Fitch's Corporate Rating
Criteria and the Sector Navigators - Addendum to the Corporate
Rating Criteria on January 9, 2026.

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Kingspan Group Plc

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bbb,
Lower), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Higher), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb, Moderate), Profitability (bbb+,
Moderate), Financial Structure (a-, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (a-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 30% weight for the forecast year 2025,
30% for the forecast year 2026, 20% for the forecast year 2027 and
20% for the forecast year 2028.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bbb'.

Tarkett Participation

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb-, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb+,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb+, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb+, Lower), Profitability (b+,
Higher), Financial Structure (b+, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (bb, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 25% weight for the forecast year 2025,
25% for the forecast year 2026, 25% for the forecast year 2027 and
25% for the forecast year 2028.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

Hestiafloor 2 (Gerflor)

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bb+, Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb, Lower), Profitability (bbb-,
Moderate), Financial Structure (b, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (bb-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 30% weight for the forecast year 2025,
30% for the forecast year 2026, 20% for the forecast year 2027 and
20% for the forecast year 2028.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

Victoria Plc

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (b+, Moderate), Sector Characteristics (bb,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (b, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb-, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (b+, Moderate), Profitability (b-,
Moderate), Financial Structure (ccc-, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (b-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 10% weight for the historical year
2024, 30% for the forecast year 2025, 30% for the forecast year
2026 and 30% for the forecast year 2027.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Some Deficiencies' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'ccc'.

RATING ACTIONS

   Entity/Debt             Rating           Recovery   Prior
   -----------             ------           --------   -----
Hestiafloor 2

                   LT IDR  B+    Affirmed                 B+
   senior secured  LT      BB-   Affirmed       RR3       BB-

Victoria PLC     

                    LT IDR CCC  Rating Watch              CCC
                                 Maintained

   senior secured   LT     CC   Rating Watch     RR6      CC
                                 Maintained

   senior secured   LT     CCC+ Rating Watch     RR3      CCC+
                                 Maintained

Tarkett Participation      

                    LT IDR B+   Affirmed                  B+
   senior secured   LT     BB-  Affirmed         RR3      BB-

Kingspan Group Plc   

                    LT IDR BBB  Affirmed                  BBB

Kingspan Securities
(Ireland) DAC

   senior unsecured  LT    BBB  Affirmed                  BBB




=============
I R E L A N D
=============

EUROMAX V ABS: Fitch Lowers Rating on Class A2 Notes to 'BB-sf'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded Euromax V ABS PLC's class A2 notes to
'BB-sf' from 'BBsf' and affirmed the rest as detailed below.

   Entity/Debt             Rating            Prior
   -----------             ------            -----
Euromax V ABS PLC

   A2 XS0274616381      LT BB-sf Downgrade   BBsf
   A3 XS0274616977      LT CCsf  Affirmed    CCsf
   A4 XS0274617439      LT Csf   Affirmed    Csf
   B1 XS0274617603      LT Csf   Affirmed    Csf
   B2 XS0274617942      LT Csf   Affirmed    Csf

Transaction Summary

Euromax V ABS PLC is a securitisation of mainly European structured
finance securities that closed in 2006.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Deteriorating Performance, Principal Covers Interest: According to
the January trustee report, the average credit quality of the
performing portfolio is now 29.4, up from 16.1 in January 2025,
signalling a deterioration in credit quality. The class A2 notes'
collateralisation now depends on EUROSAIL 2006-1X PLC D1A notes,
which were downgraded to 'BB-sf' from 'Asf' at the last review
dated February 2025. The sum of the principal amounts of assets
rated 'BBsf' and above is now EUR4.35 million, which is less than
the class A2 tranche notional of EUR4.69 million.

The downgraded bond resulted in a total notional of assets rated
'BB-sf' or higher at EUR10.4 million, providing 2.2x cover for the
senior rated notes. However, according to the January 2026 trustee
report, EUR30,000 of principal collections was used to pay class A3
interest, which must be paid before principal payments on the class
A2 notes, in turn weighing on the transaction.

Reducing Credit Enhancement: The only notable change in the
portfolio composition since the last review is a reduction in total
assets to EUR24.9 million, from EUR32.7 million, driven by the
write-off of three defaulted assets (TMAN 7 F, B-Note: Tiden, DECO
9-E3X G). Credit enhancement has reduced year-on-year to 81.2% from
85.2%, according to Fitch calculations.

Increased Correlation Impact: The top 10 obligor concentration
among performing assets is at 100% while the largest issuer now
comprises 58% of the performing portfolio, up from 37.9% at the
last review, according to Fitch calculations.

Geographic and Asset Concentration: There has only been partial
amortisation of three the assets since February 2025, and according
to the latest trustee report, assets rated 'CCCsf' and above
comprise exclusively Dutch and UK RMBS assets.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

Downgrades may occur if the build-up of the notes' credit
enhancement following amortisation does not compensate for a larger
loss expectation than assumed due to unexpectedly high levels of
defaults and portfolio deterioration.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

The senior class notes could be upgraded if portfolio credit
quality and deal performance outperforms its expectations, and
amortisation leads to higher credit enhancement and excess spread
available to cover losses on the remaining portfolio. Upgrades for
the tranches rated 'CCsf' or below are currently not expected,
because these notes are showing negative credit enhancement.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

Euromax V ABS PLC

Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the
information it has received about the performance of the asset
pool[s] and the transaction[s]. Fitch has not reviewed the results
of any third party assessment of the asset portfolio information or
conducted a review of origination files as part of its ongoing
monitoring.

Fitch did not undertake a review of the information provided about
the underlying asset pool[s] ahead of the transaction's [Euromax V
ABS PLC] initial closing. The subsequent performance of the
transaction[s] over the years is consistent with the agency's
expectations given the operating environment and Fitch is therefore
satisfied that the asset pool information relied upon for its
initial rating analysis was adequately reliable.

Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above,
Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's
rating analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies
indicates that it is adequately reliable.

ESG Considerations

Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores for Euromax V ABS PLC.

In cases where Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores in
connection with the credit rating of a transaction, programme,
instrument or issuer, Fitch will disclose any ESG factor that is a
key rating driver in the key rating drivers section of the relevant
rating action commentary.



=====================
N E T H E R L A N D S
=====================

DARLING GLOBAL: Fitch Affirms BB+ Senior Unsecured Rating
---------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the ratings for eight North American
protein and agricultural processing companies and their related
subsidiaries:

  1. Archer Daniels Midland Company

  2. Bunge Global SA, Bunge Limited Finance Corp., Koninklijke
     Bunge B.V. and Bunge Finance Europe B.V.

  3. Darling Ingredients, Inc.

  4. Ingredion Incorporated

  5. Primary Products Investments LLC and Primary Products
     Finance LLC

  6. Smithfield Foods, Inc.

  7. Tyson Foods, Inc.

  8. Wayne-Sanderson Farms LLC

These actions follow the update of Fitch's "Corporate Rating
Criteria" and the "Sector Navigators Addendum to the Corporate
Rating Criteria" on Jan. 9, 2026. The companies' ratings and
Outlooks are unaffected by the criteria changes.

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

Archer Daniels Midland Company

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (a,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (a, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (a-, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (a, Moderate), Profitability (a,
Moderate), Financial Structure (a, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (a-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2025,
40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the forecast year 2027.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'a'.

To derive the IDR:

- No adjustments made to the SCP, resulting in an IDR of 'A'.

Bunge Global SA, Bunge Limited Finance Corp., Koninklijke Bunge
B.V. and Bunge Finance Europe B.V.

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (a,
Moderate), Market & Competitive Positioning (a, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (a-, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (a, Moderate), Profitability (bbb+,
Moderate), Financial Structure (bbb, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (a-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2026,
40% for the forecast year 2027 and 40% for the forecast year 2028.

- The Governance Impact assessment of 'Good' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment Impact assessment of 'a' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bbb+'.

To derive the IDR:

- Application of Fitch's Parent Subsidiary Linkage Considerations
Rating Criteria results in a(n) consolidated approach.

- No adjustments made to the SCP, resulting in an IDR of 'BBB+'

Darling Ingredients, Inc. and Darling Global Finance B.V.

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb+,
Higher), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb-, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb-, Moderate), Profitability (bb,
Moderate), Financial Structure (bbb-, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (bbb, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 25% weight for the forecast year 2025,
25% for the forecast year 2026, 25% for the forecast year 2027 and
25% for the forecast year 2028.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bb+'.

To derive the IDR:

- Application of Fitch's Parent Subsidiary Linkage Considerations
Rating Criteria results in a consolidated approach.

- No adjustments made to SCP resulting in an IDR of 'BB+'

Ingredion Incorporated

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bbb,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb-, Higher), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb-, Moderate), Profitability (bbb+,
Moderate), Financial Structure (a+, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (a-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2026,
40% for the forecast year 2027 and 40% for the forecast year 2028.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bbb'.

To derive the IDR:

- No adjustments made to the SCP, resulting in an IDR of 'BBB'

Primary Products Investments LLC and Primary Products Finance LLC

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb-, Lower), Sector Characteristics
(bbb-, Moderate), Market & Competitive Positioning (bb+, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (b+, Higher), Company Operational
Characteristics (bb+, Moderate), Profitability (bb-, Moderate),
Financial Structure (bb, Higher), and Financial Flexibility (bb+,
Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2026
(ending March 2026), 40% for the forecast year 2027 and 40% for the
forecast year 2028.

- The Governance Impact assessment of 'Good' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment Impact assessment of 'aa-' results in
no adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bb'.

To derive the IDR:

- No adjustments made to the SCP, resulting in an IDR of 'BB'

Smithfield Foods, Inc.

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bbb,
Moderate), Market & Competitive Positioning (bbb, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Higher), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb, Moderate), Profitability (bb+,
Moderate), Financial Structure (bbb+, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (a-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 25% weight for the forecast year 2025,
25% for the forecast year 2026, 25% for the forecast year 2027 and
25% for the forecast year 2028.

- The Governance Impact assessment of 'Good' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment Impact assessment of 'aa-' results in
no adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bbb-'.

To derive the IDR:

- Application of Fitch's Parent Subsidiary Linkage Considerations
Rating Criteria results in a bottom up +1 approach.

Tyson Foods, Inc.

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bbb,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bbb, Higher), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb, Moderate), Profitability (bbb-,
Moderate), Financial Structure (bbb+, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (a-, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 25% weight for fiscal 2025 (ended
September 2025), 25% for the forecast year 2026, 25% for the
forecast year 2027 and 25% for the forecast year 2028.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bbb'.

To derive the IDR:

- Application of Fitch's Parent Subsidiary Linkage Rating Criteria
results in an equalized approach.

Wayne-Sanderson Farms LLC

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bbb, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb+,
Moderate), Market & Competitive Positioning (bb, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (b+, Higher), Company Operational
Characteristics (bbb-, Moderate), Profitability (bb, Higher),
Financial Structure (bbb+, Moderate), and Financial Flexibility
(bbb+, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 25% weight for fiscal 2025 (ended
March 2025), 25% for the forecast year 2026, 25% for the forecast
year 2027 and 25% for the forecast year 2028.

- The Governance Impact assessment of 'Good' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment Impact assessment of 'aa-' results in
no adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bb'.

To derive the IDR:

No adjustments made to the SCP, resulting in an IDR of 'BB'

Recovery Analysis

Fitch has assigned Recovery Ratings (RRs) to the various debt
tranches in accordance with its criteria, which allows for the
assignment of RRs for issuers with IDRs in the 'BB' category. Given
the distance to default, RRs in the 'BB' category are not computed
by bespoke analysis. Instead, they serve as a label to reflect an
estimate of the risk of these instruments relative to other
instruments in the entity's capital structure.

Wayne-Sanderson Farms LLC

Fitch assigned a 'BBB-' with a Recovery Rating of 'RR1' to the
company's senior secured first lien credit facilities (including
revolver and term loans) notched up two from the IDR.

Darling Ingredients, Inc. and Darling Global Finance B.V.

Fitch assigned a 'BB+' with a Recovery Rating of 'RR4' to the
unsecured bonds, in line with the company's IDR.

Primary Products Investments LLC and Primary Products Finance LLC

Fitch assigned a 'BBB-' with a Recovery Rating of 'RR1' to the
asset-based revolving credit facility (ABL) and 'BB+ with a
Recovery Rating of 'RR2' to the senior secured first lien revolver
and term loan.

RATING ACTIONS

   Entity/Debt                  Rating           Recovery Prior
   -----------                  ------           -------- -----
Bunge Global SA    

                        LT IDR   BBB+  Affirmed            BBB+

Ingredion Incorporated  

                        LT IDR   BBB   Affirmed            BBB
                        ST IDR   F2    Affirmed            F2
   senior unsecured     LT       BBB   Affirmed            BBB
   senior unsecured     ST       F2    Affirmed            F2

Primary Products
Finance LLC         

                        LT IDR   BB    Affirmed            BB
   senior secured       LT       BBB-  Affirmed   RR1      BBB-
   senior secured       LT       BB+   Affirmed   RR2      BB+

Bunge Limited
Finance Corp.       

                        ST IDR   F2    Affirmed            F2
   senior unsecured     LT       BBB+  Affirmed            BBB+
   senior unsecured     ST       F2    Affirmed            F2

Wayne-Sanderson Farms LLC

                        LT IDR   BB    Affirmed            BB
   senior secured       LT       BBB-  Affirmed   RR1      BBB-

Smithfield Foods, Inc.

                        LT IDR   BBB   Affirmed            BBB
                        ST IDR   F2    Affirmed            F2
  senior unsecured      LT       BBB   Affirmed            BBB
  senior unsecured      ST       F2    Affirmed            F2

Bunge Finance Europe B.V.

   senior unsecured     LT       BBB+  Affirmed            BBB+

Darling Ingredients, Inc.

                        LT IDR   BB+   Affirmed            BB+
  senior unsecured      LT       BB+   Affirmed   RR4      BB+

Koninklijke Bunge B.V.

                        LT IDR   BBB+  Affirmed            BBB+

Tyson Foods, Inc.

                        LT IDR   BBB   Affirmed            BBB
                        ST IDR   F2    Affirmed            F2
  senior unsecured      LT       BBB   Affirmed            BBB
  senior unsecured      ST       F2    Affirmed            F2

Primary Products Investments LLC     

                        LT IDR   BB    Affirmed            BB

Archer Daniels Midland Company       

                        LT IDR   A     Affirmed            A
                        ST IDR   F1    Affirmed            F1
  senior unsecured      LT       A     Affirmed            A
  senior unsecured      ST       F1    Affirmed            F1

Darling Global Finance B.V.

  senior unsecured      LT       BB+   Affirmed            BB+

The Hillshire Brands Company      

                        LT IDR   BBB   Affirmed            BBB
  senior unsecured      LT       BBB   Affirmed            BBB



=====================
S W I T Z E R L A N D
=====================

TRANSOCEAN LTD: Agrees to Acquire Valaris in $5.8B All-Stock Merger
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Transocean Ltd. disclosed in a regulatory filing that the Company
and Valaris Limited, an exempted company limited by shares
incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, entered into a Business
Combination Agreement providing for the combination of the two
Parties.

Pursuant to the Agreement, and on the terms and subject to the
conditions thereof, Transocean will acquire all the issued and
outstanding common shares, par value $0.01 each, of Valaris in
exchange for shares of Transocean, par value $0.10 each, at an
exchange ratio of 15.235 Transocean Shares for each Valaris Share.


The Business Combination will be effected by way of a
court-approved scheme of arrangement between Valaris and the
holders of the Valaris Shares pursuant to section 99 of the
Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, as amended, on the terms set out the
Scheme Document. The Transocean Shares are expected to be issued in
reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the
United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided by
Section 3(a)(10) thereof and pursuant to exemptions from
registration under any applicable state securities laws.

Following the consummation of the Business Combination,
Transocean's existing shareholders and Valaris' existing
shareholders will own approximately 53% and 47%, respectively, of
the combined company.

Pursuant to the Agreement, and on the terms and subject to the
conditions thereof, at the time on which the order of the Supreme
Court of Bermuda providing for its sanction of the Scheme of
Arrangement is filed with the Registrar of Companies of Bermuda,
the Business Combination will become effective and Valaris will
become a subsidiary of Transocean.

The board of directors of each Party unanimously approved and
declared advisable the Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, including the Business Combination.

Valaris Shares; Valaris Warrants

Pursuant to the Agreement, and on the terms and subject to the
conditions thereof, at the Effective Time, each Valaris Share
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time
(other than the Valaris Shares referenced in the next sentence)
will be entitled to receive:

     (a) a number of Transocean Shares equal to the Exchange Ratio
and

     (b) any cash in lieu of fractional Transocean Shares. Each
Valaris Share that is owned by:

     (a) Valaris as treasury shares or owned by any Valaris
Subsidiary or

     (b) Transocean or any Transocean Subsidiary, in each case,
immediately prior to the Effective Time, will be canceled
automatically and shall cease to exist and be issued and
outstanding and no consideration shall be delivered in exchange
therefor nor any repayment of capital made in respect thereof.

Pursuant to the Agreement, and on the terms and subject to the
conditions thereof, at the Effective Time, each warrant of Valaris
issued pursuant to that certain Warrant Agreement, dated as of
April 30, 2021, among Valaris, Computershare, Inc. and
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. that is outstanding and
unexercised as of immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall
immediately be assumed by Transocean, remain outstanding and, in
lieu of the number of Valaris Shares then exercisable under such
Valaris Warrant prior to the Effective Time, be exercisable for the
Fundamental Transaction Consideration (as defined in the Valaris
Warrant Agreement) multiplied by the number of Valaris Shares for
which a Valaris Warrant is exercisable immediately prior to the
consummation of the Business Combination.

Post-Closing Board of Directors

Pursuant to the Agreement, and on the terms and subject to the
conditions thereof, following the consummation of the Business
Combination and approval by the majority of the votes cast of
Transocean Shares Transocean's board of directors will include two
current Valaris directors identified by Valaris and reasonably
acceptable to Transocean.

Treatment of Valaris Equity Awards

The Agreement provides that, subject to limited exceptions, each
Valaris restricted stock unit that is outstanding immediately prior
to the date of the Agreement will:

     (i) vest at the Effective Time;

    (ii) be automatically converted into the right to receive a
number of Transocean Shares equal to the product of:

          (x) the number of Valaris Shares subject to such Valaris
RSU multiplied by

          (y) the Exchange Ratio, reduced by the number of
Transocean Shares to satisfy any tax withholding obligations
associated with the settlement of such Valaris RSU, rounded to the
nearest whole share; and

   (iii) except with respect to the rights of each holder set forth
in clause (ii), automatically be canceled, retired and shall cease
to exist.

Subject to limited exceptions, each Valaris performance-based
restricted stock unit that is outstanding immediately prior to the
Agreement Date shall:

     (i) vest at the Effective Time with the number of Valaris
Shares earned under such Valaris PSU being based on the actual
achievement of the applicable performance goals as of the Effective
Time;


    (ii) be converted automatically into the right to receive a
number of Transocean Shares equal to the product of:

          (x) the number of Valaris Shares earned pursuant to
clause (i) above multiplied by

          (y) the Exchange Ratio, reduced by the number of
Transocean Shares to satisfy any tax withholding obligations
associated with the settlement of such Valaris PSU, and rounded to
the nearest whole share; and

   (iii) except with respect to the rights of each holder set forth
in clause (ii), automatically be canceled, retired and shall cease
to exist.

As of the Effective Time, each Valaris RSU and Valaris PSU, that is
granted after the Agreement Date and outstanding immediately prior
to the Effective Time, shall be assumed by Transocean and converted
into a Transocean time-based equity award. Each Transocean
time-based equity award converted from a Valaris PSU will cover a
number of Transocean Shares equal to the product of:

     (i) the target number of Valaris Shares subject to such
Valaris PSU; and

    (ii) the Exchange Ratio, rounded to the nearest whole number of
Transocean Shares.

Conditions to the Business Combination

The Parties' respective obligations to complete the Business
Combination are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain
customary conditions set forth in the Agreement, including, but not
limited to:

     (i) the receipt of the requisite approvals of the Valaris
Shareholders and the Transocean Shareholders,

    (ii) the granting of the Sanction Order on terms consistent
with the Agreement,

   (iii) the Transocean shares issued pursuant to the Agreement
having been approved for listing on the NYSE,

    (iv) certain regulatory approvals having been obtained or any
applicable waiting period having expired or been terminated,

     (v) no governmental authority within applicable jurisdictions
having enacted or issued any law or order preventing or prohibiting
the consummation of the Business Combination and

    (vi) the absence of a Transocean Material Adverse Effect or a
Valaris Material Adverse Effect.

Regulatory Efforts

Each Party has agreed to use its respective reasonable best efforts
to promptly take all actions necessary, proper or advisable to
obtain regulatory approvals as soon as reasonably practicable,
including by making all necessary filings with appropriate
Governmental Authorities, responding as soon as reasonably
practicable to any requests for information or meetings by
Governmental Authorities, and defending any antitrust lawsuits or
proceedings challenging the transactions; provided, however, that
Transocean shall not be required to sell, hold separate or
otherwise dispose of or conduct their business in a specified
manner to the extent that such obligations or restrictions would
result in a material adverse effect on either Party, in each case,
subject to the terms of the Agreement.

Termination and Fees

The Agreement also contains certain customary termination rights in
favor of each Party, including for the failure to receive the
requisite approvals of the Valaris Shareholders and Transocean
Shareholder. In addition, a Party may terminate the Agreement,
prior to the receipt of the requisite approval of the other Party's
shareholders, if the other Party shall have made an Adverse
Recommendation Change. In addition, either Valaris or Transocean
may terminate the Agreement if the Effective Time shall not have
occurred on or prior to February 9, 2027 (as such date may be
extended in accordance with the terms of the Agreement).

In connection with a termination of the Agreement under specified
circumstances, including if the Agreement is terminated by
Transocean for Valaris having made an Adverse Recommendation
Change, or certain other triggering events, Transocean will be
required to pay to Valaris a termination fee of $195 million.

In addition, if the Agreement is terminated under specified
circumstances, including if the Agreement is terminated by Valaris
for Transocean having made an Adverse Recommendation Change, or for
certain other triggering events, Valaris will be required to pay to
Transocean a termination fee of $173 million.

In other specified circumstances where the Agreement is terminated
following the failure to obtain the requisite shareholder approval
and the above referenced termination fee is not otherwise payable
by the Party that failed to obtain such shareholder approval, the
Party whose shareholders failed to approve the transactions
contemplated by the Agreement will be required to pay the other
Party up to, in the case of a payment by Transocean, $65 million,
and in the case of Valaris, $58 million, as reimbursement for the
other Party's reasonable and documented fees and expenses in
connection with the Agreement.

No Solicitation

The Agreement further provides that, from the date of the
Agreement, each of Transocean and Valaris will be subject to
certain restrictions on its ability to solicit an alternative
Acquisition Proposal from third parties, to provide non-public
information to third parties and to engage in discussions with
third parties regarding alternative Acquisition Proposals, subject
to customary exceptions. Each Party is required to call a meeting
of its shareholders to obtain the required approval of such Party's
shareholders described above and, subject to certain exceptions, to
recommend that their respective shareholders approve such
proposals. Neither Party has the ability to terminate to accept a
Superior Proposal.

Representations, Warranties and Covenants

The Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and
covenants for a transaction of this nature, including, among
others, covenants obligating each Party to continue to conduct
their respective businesses in the ordinary course, to cooperate in
seeking regulatory approvals and not to engage in certain specified
transactions or activities without the prior consent of the other
Party.

A full text copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/ypsew67k.

Support Agreements

In connection with the execution of the Agreement, on February 9,
2026,

     (a) certain shareholders of Valaris holding in the aggregate
approximately 18% of Valaris Shares outstanding, entered into a
Support Agreement with Transocean and

     (b) certain shareholders of Transocean holding in the
aggregate approximately 9% of Transocean Shares outstanding,
entered into a Support Agreement with Valaris.

The Support Agreements provide, on the terms and subject to the
conditions thereof, that each Supporting Shareholder will vote the
shares owned by such Supporting Shareholder at the time of the
applicable shareholder meeting in favor of the transactions
contemplated by the Agreement.

"This transaction creates a very attractive investment in the
offshore drilling industry, differentiated by the best fleet,
proven people, leading technologies, and unequalled customer
service," said Keelan Adamson, Transocean President and Chief
Executive Officer. "The powerful combination is well-timed to
capitalize on an emerging, multi-year offshore drilling upcycle.
Investors and our global customers will benefit from our expanded
fleet of best-in-class, high-specification rigs. We have identified
more than $200 million in cost synergies that will complement our
ongoing efforts to safely lower costs. The strong pro forma cash
flow enables us to accelerate debt reduction, resulting in an
expected leverage ratio of about 1.5x within 24 months of the
transaction closing."

                          About Transocean

Transocean Ltd. is an international provider of offshore contract
drilling services for oil and gas wells. The Company specializes in
technically demanding sectors of the offshore drilling business,
with a particular focus on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment
drilling services. As of Feb. 14, 2024, the Company owned or had
partial ownership interests in and operated 37 mobile offshore
drilling units, consisting of 28 ultra-deepwater floaters and nine
harsh environment floaters. Additionally, as of Feb. 14, 2024, the
Company was constructing one ultra-deepwater drillship.

As of September 30, 2025, the Company had $16.17 billion in total
assets, $2.24 billion in total current liabilities, $5.86 billion
in total long-term liabilities, and $8.08 billion in total equity.


                             *     *     *

Egan-Jones Ratings Company on January 21, 2025, maintained its
'CCC-' foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings
on debt issued by Transocean Ltd.

In October 2025, S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on offshore
drilling contractor Transocean Ltd. to stable from negative and
affirmed all its ratings on the company, including the 'CCC+'
Company credit rating.



===========
T U R K E Y
===========

ANADOLU SIGORTA: Fitch Alters Ratings Outlook to Positive
---------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has revised Anadolu Anonim Turk Sigorta Sirketi's
(Anadolu Sigorta) Outlook to Positive from Stable, while affirming
its Insurer Financial Strength (IFS) Rating at 'BB'.

The revision of the Outlook on Anadolu Sigorta's IFS Rating follows
Fitch's similar action on the Outlook of Turkiye's Long-Term
Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR; see 'Fitch Revises
Turkiye's Outlook to Positive; Affirms at 'BB-'', dated 23 January
2026). The sovereign's credit quality directly affects its
assessment of Anadolu Sigorta's investment risk.

The IFS Rating of Anadolu Sigorta continues to reflect its very
strong position in the country, adequate capitalisation and
profitability, offset by its high exposure to Turkish financial
assets.

Key Rating Drivers

Improving, High Investment Risk: The Outlook revisions on Türkiye
and domestic banks to Positive support its view of Anadolu
Sigorta's improving investment and asset risks, given its
portfolio's substantially exposure to sovereign and local bank
credit risks. Cash and Turkish bank deposits represented 35% of
invested assets at end-2025, while government bonds accounted for
another 28%. The risky-asset ratio weakened to 175% at end-2025
from 158% at end-2024 due to increased allocations to government
bonds exposure but was still better than 213% at end-2023.

Good Capitalisation: Its view of the company's capitalisation is
underpinned by its local regulatory solvency ratio at well above
the 100% minimum at end-2025 and end-2024, and by Fitch's Prism
Global score of 'Adequate' at end-2024 and end-2023. Fitch expects
the Prism score to have remained unchanged at end-2025, supported
by strong profitability.

Improving Profitability: Return on equity was 34% in 2025 (47% in
2024) and remained above inflation (31% in 2025; 44% in 2024).
Strong investment returns more than offset continued underwriting
losses, as reflected in a combined ratio of 108% in 2025 (104% in
2024). Financial performance had improved substantially since
2023.

Leading Turkish Insurer: Anadolu Sigorta remains a leading insurer
in Turkiye's highly competitive insurance sector. It was the
country's third-largest non-life insurer at end-2025, with a market
share of about 9%. Fitch expects Anadolu Sigorta's strong
competitive positioning to support the resilience of its credit
profile against the challenges posed by the Turkish economy and its
operating environment.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- The Outlook could be revised to Stable if the Outlooks on
Turkiye's Long-Term Local-Currency (LTLC) IDR and on major Turkish
banks are revised to Stable

- A downgrade of Turkiye's LTLC IDR or major Turkish banks'
ratings, leading to material deterioration in the company's
investment quality

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- An upgrade of Turkiye's LTLC IDR or major Turkish banks' ratings
leading to material improvement in the company's asset and
investment risk

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt               Rating           Prior
   -----------               ------           -----
Anadolu Anonim
Turk Sigorta Sirketi   LT IFS BB  Affirmed    BB




===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

A.L.N. CARPENTRY: Exigen Group Named as Administrators
------------------------------------------------------
A.L.N. Carpentry & Joinery Ltd was placed into administration in
the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England
and Wales, Insolvency and Companies List, Court Number
CR-2026-000912.  David Kemp and Richard Hunt of Exigen Group
Limited were appointed as joint administrators on February 6,
2026.

The company's businesses includes building completion and
finishing, buying and selling of own real estate, and other letting
and operating of own or leased real estate.

The company's registered office is at Warehouse W, 3 Western
Gateway, Royal Victoria Docks, London, E16 1BD, and its principal
trading address is Suite 14, 8 Lyndon House, Kings Court,
Newmarket, England, CB8 7SG.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

     David Kemp (IP No. 24510)
     Richard Hunt (IP No. 21772)
     Exigen Group Limited
     Warehouse W, 3 Western Gateway
     London, E16 1BD

For further details, contact:

     David Kemp
     Tel: 0207 538 2222


CRENOON LIMITED: Currie Young Named as Administrators
-----------------------------------------------------
Crenoon Limited, trading as Afford Rent a Car, was placed into
administration in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property
Courts in Birmingham, Insolvency and Companies List (Ch D), Case
No. 000038 of 2026.  Steven John Currie and Sophie Leigh Murcott of
Currie Young Limited were appointed as joint administrators on
February 5, 2026.

The company engaged in the renting and leasing of cars.

The company's registered office and principal trading address is at
Royal Oak Garage, City Road, Fenton, ST4 2PX.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

    Steven John Currie (IP No. 9675)
    Sophie Leigh Murcott (IP No. 30510)
    Currie Young Limited
    Riverside 2, No.3, Campbell Road
    Stoke on Trent, ST4 4RJ

For further details, contact:

   Steven Currie
   Telephone: 01782 394500
   Email: sjc@currieyoung.com


MARKET PARENT: Fitch Alters Outlook on 'B' LongTerm IDR to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has revised Market Holdco 3 Limited's (Morrisons)
Outlook to Stable from Positive and affirmed the Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'B'.

The Outlook revision reflects a slight decline in EBITDAR for FY25
(year-end October 2025) and its updated view on limited
profitability improvement in 2026-2028 in a highly competitive food
retail environment in the UK and upward pressure on operating
costs, leading to more modest leverage improvements than previously
anticipated.

The IDR reflects high leverage balanced by vertical integration,
well-invested stores, channel diversification and cash-generation
capabilities. Its Stable Outlook reflects its expectation of stable
to mildly improving profitability margin and leverage remaining
within its sensitivities over the rating horizon, as cost
reduction, the recent restructuring of underperforming convenience
stores and bakery business, plus a continued increase of wholesale
business largely mitigate anticipated cost inflation.

Key Rating Drivers

Lowered Profits, Deleveraging More Limited: Morrisons' FY25 EBITDAR
was slightly lower than its expectation of a modest increase. In
addition, Fitch now anticipates EBITDAR margin to remain below the
FY24 level following continuing labour cost and business rate
increases. The lower profitability no longer supports EBITDAR
deleveraging aligned with a higher rating, despite its unchanged
expectation of low single digit like-for-like (lfl) revenue growth.
This underlines its Outlook revision.

Fitch estimates EBITDAR leverage to have remained unchanged at 6.6x
in FYE25 versus 6.3x under its previous rating case. Fitch still
expects it to reduce in subsequent periods to 6.2x by FY28 due to
earnings growth. However, Fitch sees execution risk to earnings
growth, given the highly competitive UK market, but its projection
of comfortable headroom to the rating supports a Stable Outlook.

Resilient Margin: Fitch expects Morrisons' profit margin to recover
modestly from FY26, supported by revenue growth, delivery of cost
savings and the maturation of its convenience and wholesale
channels. The management's GBP1 billion cost-reduction programme
remains a key lever, with GBP155 million still to be delivered,
helping to offset ongoing cost inflation. Additional upside could
come from improved manufacturing efficiencies, increased
third-party sales and growth in retail media.

Negligible Market Share Reduction: Morrisons is one of the leading
food retailers in the competitive UK market, with a strong brand
and scale. Since 2025, its market share has declined only slightly
to 8.4% from 8.5%, compared with its overall 0.5% decline over
2023-2024. Price-match initiatives and the expansion of the premium
own-label range have helped the company to remain relevant across
value-to-premium customer segments. Morrisons is more food-focussed
than some of its close peers and its integration into its own food
manufacturing, which accounts for 50% of the fresh food it sells,
helps it manage its profitability.

Inflation Supports LFL Sales Growth: Morrisons has continued to
report lfl sales growth, supported by a focussed strategy under its
new CEO. It slowed in 1QFY25 due to a cyber-attack at one of its
suppliers but recovered in the following quarters, leading to an
overall 2.8% lfl rise in FY25. Further, 3.4% lfl growth in the
run-up to the Christmas period provided a good start for FY26.
Fitch continues to expect revenue growth in FY26 to be supported by
food price inflation, despite intensified competition in the UK
grocery market and growth of its wholesale operations.

Limited/Neutral Free Cash Flow: Fitch forecasts average annual
positive free cash flow (FCF) of GBP25 million to GBP50 million for
FY26-FY27, after estimated negative FCF in FY25 due to the one-off
cyber attack in 1QFY25 and restructuring costs. This is down from
GBP50 million-70 million in its previous forecast, as Fitch does
not anticipate lower EBITDA to be fully offset by lower interest
costs and lower capex. Its revised rating case assumes the
company's working capital programme will generate additional
working-capital inflows, as GBP60 million of its GBP600 million
programme target has yet to be delivered.

Sale and Leaseback Transaction: Fitch views sale and leaseback
transactions as neutral to leverage when used for debt reduction,
while reducing the company's share of freehold properties and
eroding EBITDA and FCF as lease costs increase. Morrisons raised an
additional GBP98 million through sale and leaseback in 2025, which
follows its GBP331 million ground rent transaction on 76 properties
in September 2024. Further sale and leasebacks will further impair
the already limited FCF and increase leverage, if not accompanied
by debt reduction.

Peer Analysis

Morrisons is rated at the same level as Bellis Finco plc (ASDA;
B/Negative); ASDA benefits from larger scale and greater
diversification. Both Morrisons and ASDA are smaller than UK market
leader, Tesco PLC (BBB/Stable), which similarly to ASDA and
Morrisons, also focuses its operations on the UK. Morrisons is
larger and more diversified than WD FF Limited (Iceland;
B/Stable).

Morrisons has a smaller market share than ASDA but has recently
outperformed the latter with continued lfl growth, while ASDA has
been losing market share in the last two years. Both companies have
established direct access to the convenience category, with
Morrisons benefiting from its larger number of stores, although
they are, on average, slightly smaller than ASDA's. Both are
exposed to execution risk as they seek sales and profit growth from
converting acquired and franchised stores to their own brands and
product mix changes. Morrisons also has indirect access to
convenience through its wholesale channel.

Fitch forecasts EBITDAR margins to trend towards 5% and funds from
operations margins to trend towards 2% for both Morrisons and
ASDA.

Fitch expects ASDA's recent strategic shift to accelerate sales
volume growth, raising EBITDAR leverage to 6.3x by end-2028,
marginally above Morrisons' 6.2x by FY28. ASDA also has a similar
fixed-charge coverage ratio to Morrisons', at 1.6x. Morrisons'
leverage is materially higher than Tesco's (about 3x) and above
smaller-scale Iceland's (about 5x).

Fitch’s Key Rating-Case Assumptions

- Low single-digit revenue growth during FY26-FY28

- Retail in-store and online sales growth of 2.1% a year, driven by
price increases

- Other sales to grow by 7% in FY26-FY28, driven by the expansion
of the existing wholesale business from new clients, online revenue
growth and manufacturing business gaining new contracts

- EBITDA (after leases) margin to increase to 3.7% in FY26 from
3.6% in FY25, as the cost saving programme offsets higher labour
and lease costs. This is followed by a small increase to 3.8% by
FY28, supported by sales growth across both retail and wholesale
channels, alongside operational and cost-saving measures that will
help offset cost inflation

- Annual working-capital inflow (excluding changes in provisions)
of about GBP55 million on average in FY26-FY28, driven by trade
working-capital efficiency initiatives

- Annual capex at GBP330 million for FY26 and GBP360 million for
FY27-FY28

- Rental costs of GBP240 million a year on average

- No dividend payments and no M&A to FY28

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb, Moderate), Sector Characteristics
(bb+, Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bb+, Higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb-, Lower), Profitability (bb+,
Moderate), Financial Structure (ccc+, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (b+, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on standard CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the latest historical
year 2024, 40% for the forecast year 2025 and 40% for the forecast
year 2026.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

Recovery Analysis

According to its bespoke recovery analysis, higher recoveries would
be realised by liquidation in bankruptcy rather than reorganisation
as a going concern. This reflects Morrisons' high portion of
freehold assets ownership.

The liquidation estimate reflects Fitch's view of the value of
balance-sheet assets that can be realised in a sale or liquidation
and distributed to creditors. Fitch assumes Morrisons' GBP1 billion
revolving credit facility (RCF) to be fully drawn and deducts 10%
from the enterprise value for administrative claims.

The company's senior secured debt comprises GBP20 million and
EUR145 million senior secured notes issued by Market Bidco Finco
Plc due in 2027, a GBP1 billion RCF incurred by Market Bidco
Limited, GBP835 million and EUR1 billion term loan B (TLBs) due in
2030 issued by Market Bidco, and GBP500 million and EUR500 million
senior secured notes due in 2031. These instruments rank pari passu
with one another and senior to the GBP750 million senior notes
issued by Market Parent Finco Plc.

Ranked recovery for the senior secured debt results in the 'RR2'
band. This translates to a 'BB-' issue rating, two notches above
the IDR. Ranked recoveries for the unsecured senior debt results in
the 'RR6' band indicating a 'CCC+' rating.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- lfl decline in sales exceeding other big competitors', especially
if combined with lower profitability leading to neutral FCF and a
reduced deleveraging capacity

- Evidence of a more aggressive financial policy, for example, due
to material under-performance relative to Fitch's forecasts, large
investments or shareholder remuneration leading to cash outflows,
and a lack of debt repayments

- EBITDAR leverage trending above 7.0x

- EBITDAR fixed charge cover below 1.5x on a sustained basis

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- lfl sales growth leading to increasing cash profits and
accumulated cash for debt prepayment, with no adverse changes to
its financial policy

- EBITDAR leverage below 6.0x on a sustained basis

- EBITDAR fixed-charge coverage above 1.6x

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Morrisons maintained a healthy cash balance of about GBP173 million
at FYE25, in addition to its GBP1 billion committed, undrawn RCF.
This was supported by proceeds from ground rent sales, which were
partly allocated to debt reduction and to fund a GBP60 million
payment for a bolt-on acquisition in December 2024.

In addition, Morrisons repaid its 2027 debt instrument with the
GBP500 million and EUR500 million senior secured notes maturing in
2031, an add-on instrument maturing in 2030, and own cash, reducing
total debt by about GBP200 million and enhancing its debt maturity
profile.

The GBP936 million RCF was extended to August 2030, while the
maturity for the remaining GBP64 million remains in August 2027
overall, providing good liquidity headroom. The RCF, TLBs and new
notes benefit from springing maturity if more than GBP300 million
of unsecured notes remain outstanding by July 2028 (GBP750 million
outstanding after refinancing).

Issuer Profile

Morrisons is the fifth-largest UK supermarket chain, operating
around 500 medium-sized supermarkets and over 1,600 Morrisons Daily
sites, including the franchise sites.

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Sector Forecasts Monitor
data file which aggregates key data points used in its credit
analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

Climate Vulnerability Signals

The results of its Climate.VS screener did not indicate an elevated
risk for Market Holdco 3 Limited.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt                   Rating          Recovery   Prior
   -----------                   ------          --------   -----
Market Bidco Limited

   senior secured          LT     BB-  Affirmed   RR2       BB-

Market Bidco Finco plc

   senior secured          LT     BB-  Affirmed   RR2       BB-

   senior secured          LT     BB-  Affirmed   RR2       BB-

Market Holdco 3 Limited    LT IDR B    Affirmed             B

Market Parent Finco plc

   senior unsecured        LT     CCC+ Affirmed   RR6       CCC+


ORIFLAME INVESTMENT: Fitch Affirms CCC IDR & Then Withdraws Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Oriflame Investment Holding Plc's
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'CCC' and senior secured
debt rating at 'CCC-' with a Recovery Rating of 'RR5'. Fitch has
subsequently withdrawn all ratings.

The IDR reflects its expectations of limited liquidity, negative
free cash flow (FCF) generation due to weak profitability, and
excessive leverage over the next three years.

Fitch has withdrawn the ratings for commercial reasons and will no
longer provide ratings or analytical coverage of the company.

Key Rating Drivers

Debt Exchange Offer Completed: Fitch views Oriflame's recently
completed debt exchange as a distressed debt exchange (DDE), as it
involved a material reduction of the original terms, including a
considerable decrease in bond principal to EUR285.5 million from
EUR779 million, and a lowering of lien priority. Further, the DDE
was conducted to avoid an eventual probable default. Oriflame
completed the recapitalisation on 22 December 2025, which has also
materially improved the company's debt maturity profile by
extending maturity on the senior notes to 2032.

Oriflame has also extended the maturity of its super senior
revolving credit facility (RCF) to June 2029 from January 2026,
with a substantial reduction in the committed amount to EUR48.8
million from EUR100 million. The committed amount would reduce by
EUR5 million-10 million a year from end-2026, towards EUR23.8
million by end-June 2028.

Poor Liquidity: The recapitalisation has helped Oriflame avoid a
liquidity crisis by materially reducing the face value of the
original senior secured notes through EUR25.5 million of new money
provided by the shareholders through the second-lien notes and
EUR46 million of 1.5-lien loans from bondholders. Its financial
flexibility is further enhanced with the allowed coupon
capitalisation for the EUR285.5 million notes and payment-in-kind
toggle for the EUR46 million 1.5-lien debt, saving about EUR27
million of cash interest annually.

However, liquidity remains limited and under pressure from
projected negative FCF for 2026-2028, which will keep liquidity
headroom tight and increase the risk of breaching the minimum EUR45
million liquidity covenant under the new RCF, to be tested from
2027. Oriflame would have used EUR32.5 million of the committed
EUR48.8 million RCF after the DDE.

Leverage Remains Excessive: Fitch expects Oriflame's leverage to
remain above 10x in 2026-2028, despite a material reduction of debt
through the DDE. Any deleveraging is now contingent on the outcome
of operational recovery over the medium term, the prospects of
which remain highly speculative at this stage.

Impaired Internal Cash Generation: Fitch expects FCF to remain
negative in 2025-2028, despite a considerably reduced cash debt
service after the DDE, reflecting Oriflame's still-weak trading and
fragile profitability, with an uncertain operational turnaround.
Revenue fell 7% in 9M25, despite the rollout of its beauty
community model and entries into new geographies. It continued to
be unprofitable as cost savings were offset by higher marketing
costs, increased distribution and infrastructure costs from a new
distribution centre, and lower operating leverage on weaker sales
volume.

Peer Analysis

Oriflame's closest sector peer is Natura Cosmeticos S.A.
(BB+/Stable), which also operates in the direct-selling beauty
market. The latter has stronger business and financial profiles,
resulting in a rating several categories above that of Oriflame.
Natura, like Oriflame, is geographically diversified with exposure
to emerging markets but benefits from greater diversity across
sales channels and a substantially larger scale as the
fourth-largest pure beauty company, after its acquisition of Avon
Products Inc.

Oriflame is rated lower than THG PLC (B+/Stable), which operates in
the beauty and well-being consumer market. The rating difference is
justified by THG's robust business model, lower EBITDA leverage of
3x-4x during 2025-2027, and satisfactory liquidity. Oriflame is
comparable with Accell Group Holding B.V. (CCC) as both face acute
operational difficulties. Accell completed a capital restructuring
in February 2025.

Fitch's Key Rating-Case Assumptions

- Revenue to rise by 1.5% in 2026 and about 5% in 2027-2028 after a
decline of 8.8% in 2025

- EBITDA of EUR5 million in 2026, and EUR20 million-40 million in
2027-2028, after being in the negative mid-to-high single-digit
millions in 2025

- Net working capital outflow in the low single-digit millions a
year to 2028, after an inflow of EUR6 million in 2025

- Capex at about EUR5 million a year to 2028

- No dividends to 2028

- No M&A to 2028

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): management (ccc, moderate), sector characteristics
(bb+, lower), market and competitive positioning (ccc+, moderate),
diversification and asset quality (bb, moderate), company
operational characteristics (b, moderate), profitability (ccc-,
higher), financial structure (ccc-, higher) and financial
flexibility (ccc, higher).

The quantitative financial subfactors are based on standard CRT
financial period parameters: 20% for historical FY24, 40% for
forecast FY25 and 40% for forecast FY26.

Assessments of the quantitative financial subfactors also include
bespoke calculations.

B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

The governance assessment of 'good' results in no adjustment.

The operating environment assessment of 'bbb+' results in no
adjustment.

The SCP is 'ccc'.

RECOVERY ANALYSIS

The recovery analysis assumes Oriflame will be reorganised as a
going concern (GC) in bankruptcy rather than liquidated. Fitch
assumes a 10% administrative claim.

Its bespoke recovery analysis estimates a GC EBITDA available to
creditors of about EUR35 million. This is sustainable EBITDA, after
reorganisation, which would allow Oriflame to retain a viable
business model. A multiple of 4.0x is applied to EBITDA to
calculate a valuation after reorganisation, reflecting its
assessment of its underlying brand and intellectual property
rights. This multiple is about half of its 2019 public-to-private
transaction multiple of 7.2x.

Its super senior EUR49 million RCF is assumed to be fully drawn on
default and ranks senior to the bondholder 1.5-lien debt, the
senior secured notes and second-lien shareholder debt. The
waterfall analysis generated a ranked recovery for its EUR286
million senior secured notes in the 'RR5' band, indicating a 'CCC-'
rating.

The 'CCC-'/'RR5' rating of the second lien senior secured bonds
could come under pressure from a combination of increasing debt
(payment-in-kind) and no progress in EBITDA turnaround.

Issuer Profile

Oriflame is a beauty manufacturer and direct selling company with a
presence in more than 60 countries.

ESG Considerations

Oriflame Investment Holding Plc has an ESG Relevance Score of '4'
for Management Strategy due to a weak operational turnaround
implementation with highly uncertain prospects, which has a
negative impact on the credit profile, and is relevant to the
rating[s] in conjunction with other factors.

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt              Rating           Recovery   Prior
   -----------              ------           --------   -----
Oriflame Investment
Holding Plc      

                      LT IDR  CCC   Affirmed            CCC
                      LT IDR  WD    Withdrawn
sr secured 2nd lien  LT      CCC-  Affirmed    RR5     CCC-
sr secured 2nd lien  LT      WD    Withdrawn


PAN MARKETING: Kreston Reeves Named as Administrators
-----------------------------------------------------
Pan Marketing Limited,  was placed into administration proceedings
in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in
Birmingham, Insolvency and Companies List (ChD), Court Number
CR-2025-005579. James Hopkirk of Kreston Reeves LLP was appointed
as Additional Joint Administrator on February 6, 2026, alongside
continuing joint administrators Martin Armstrong and Andrew Bailey
of Turpin Barker Armstrong, originally appointed on August 13,
2025.

The company specialized in the wholesale of food and beverages.

Its registered office is at Allen House, 1 Westmead Road, Sutton,
SM1 4LA.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

     James Hopkirk (IP No. 2053)
     Kreston Reeves LLP
     2nd Floor, Maritime Place
      Quayside, Chatham Maritime
      Kent, ME4 4QZ

The Continuing Joint Administrators are:

     Martin Armstrong (IP No. 006212)
     Andrew Bailey (IP No. 18810)
     Turpin Barker Armstrong
     Allen House
     1 Westmead Road, Sutton
     Surrey, SM1 4LA

For further details, contact:

     Mansi Thawani
     Tel: 01634 899800
      Email: mansi.thawani@krestonreeves.com


SENAPT ASSETS: FTS Recovery Named as Administrators
---------------------------------------------------
Senapt Assets Limited was placed into administration in the High
Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and
Wales, Insolvency and Companies, Case No. 000831 of 2026.  Marco
Piacquadio and Rachel Elizabeth Ennis of FTS Recovery Limited were
appointed as joint administrators on February 4, 2026.

The company engaged in the renting and leasing of other machinery,
equipment, and tangible goods.

The company's registered office and principal trading address is
Devonshire House, Aviary Court, Wade Road, Basingstoke, RG24 8PE.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

    Marco Piacquadio (IP No. 19910)
    Rachel Elizabeth Ennis (IP No. 32172)
    FTS Recovery Limited
    Ground Floor, Baird House
    Seebeck Place, Knowlhill
    Milton Keynes, MK5 8FR

For further details, contact:

    Jordan Martine
    Telephone: 01908 754 666
    Email: jordan.martine@ftsrecovery.co.uk


SPARK MEDICAL: RSM UK Named as Administrators
---------------------------------------------
Spark Medical Limited, was placed into administration proceedings
in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in
Leeds, Insolvency & Companies List (ChD), Court Number
CR-2026-000048, and Lee Van Lockwood and James Miller of RSM UK
Restructuring Advisory LLP were appointed as joint administrators
on February 6, 2026.

The company specialized in hospital activities.

The company's registered office is at Central Square, 29 Wellington
Street, Leeds, LS1 4DL

Its principal trading address is at Unit 34 Thursby Court, Thursby
Road, Bromborough, Wirral, CH62 3PW

The joint administrators can be reached at:

     Lee Van Lockwood (IP No. 13050)
     James Miller (IP No. 21290)
     RSM UK Restructuring Advisory LLP
     Central Square, 5th Floor
     29 Wellington Street
      Leeds, LS1 4DL

For further details, contact:

     Ryan Marsh, Case Manager
     Tel: 0113 285 5000

Alternative contact:

      The Joint Administrators, Tel: 0113 285 5000


THREE SIXTY: Leonard Curtis Named as Administrators
---------------------------------------------------
Three Sixty Design Solutions Limited was placed into administration
in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in
Manchester, Insolvency & Companies List (ChD), Court Number
CR-2026-MAN-000123.  Steve Muncaster and Andrew Poxon of Leonard
Curtis were appointed as administrators on February 4, 2026.

The Company engaged in architectural activities.

The Company's registered office is at King Edward Court, King
Edward Road, Knutsford, WA16 0BE

Its principal trading address is at Appledram Lane South,
Appledram, Chichester, PO20 7EG

The administrators can be reached at:

    Steven Muncaster (IP No. 9446)
    Andrew Poxon (IP No. 8620)
    Leonard Curtis
    Riverside House
    Irwell Street
    Manchester M3 5EN

For further details, contact:

    Telephone: 0161 831 9999
    Email: recovery@leonardcurtis.co.uk
    Alternative contact: Joe Thompson


TROJAN ENERGY: Interpath Advisory Named as Administrators
---------------------------------------------------------
Trojan Energy Limited was placed into administration in the Court
of Session, Case No. P134 of 26.  Geoffrey Isaac Jacobs and
Alistair McAlinden of Interpath Advisory, Interpath Ltd, were
appointed as joint administrators on February 9, 2026.

The company engaged in the distribution of electricity (SIC code
35120).

The company's registered office and principal trading address are
both at W-Zero-1 Building Energy Transition Zone, Hareness Road,
Aberdeen, AB12 3LE.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

    Geoffrey Isaac Jacobs (IP No. 14590)
    Alistair McAlinden (IP No. 21950)
    Interpath Advisory, Interpath Ltd
    5th Floor, 130 St Vincent Street
    Glasgow, G2 5HF

For further details contact:

    Suzanne Hamilton
    Telephone: 01224 004786
    Email: trojanqueries@interpath.com


WESTMONT SYSTEMS: Anderson Anderson Named as Administrators
-----------------------------------------------------------
Westmont Systems Limited was placed into administration in the
Court of Session, Case No. P88 of 2026. Duncan Raggett and David
McGinness of Anderson Anderson & Brown were appointed as joint
administrators on February 4, 2026.

The company specialized in electronic industrial process control
equipment.

The company's registered office is 81 George Street, Edinburgh,
Midlothian, EH2 3ES, United Kingdom.

The principal trading address is Burnside Business Court, North
Road, Inverkeithing, Fife, KY11 1NZ.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

    Duncan Raggett (IP No. 22796)
    David McGinness (IP No. 26590)
    Anderson Anderson & Brown
    81 George Street
    Edinburgh EH2 3ES

For further details, contact:

    Alternative contacts: Claire Smith
                          Beth Fogarty
    Telephone: 0131 357 6666
    Email: restructuring@aab.uk





===============
X X X X X X X X
===============

[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on 3 EMEA Bldg Product Distribution Cos.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed three EMEA building product distribution
companies' ratings and maintained a fourth company (Winterfell) on
Rating Watch Negative (RWN):

  1. Travis Perkins Plc
  2. Quimper AB (Ahlsell)
  3. Winterfell Financing S.a.r.l. (Stark)
  4. Wolseley Group Holdings Limited

These actions follow the update of Fitch's Corporate Rating
Criteria and the Sector Navigators - Addendum to the Corporate
Rating Criteria on January 9, 2026.

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Travis Perkins Plc

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb+, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb-, Lower),
Diversification and Asset Quality (b+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb-, Moderate), Profitability (b-,
Moderate), Financial Structure (bbb, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (bb+, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 25% weight for the forecast year 2025,
25% for the forecast year 2026, 25% for the forecast year 2027 and
25% for the forecast year 2028.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bb+'.

Quimper AB (Ahlsell)

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb+, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb+,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb, Lower),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bbb-, Moderate), Profitability (b+,
Higher), Financial Structure (b, Higher), and Financial Flexibility
(bb, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 30% weight for the forecast year 2025,
30% for the forecast year 2026, 20% for the forecast year 2027 and
20% for the forecast year 2028.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b+'.

Winterfell Financing S.a.r.l. (Stark)

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb+, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb-, Moderate),
Diversification and Asset Quality (bb+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb, Moderate), Profitability (b-,
Moderate), Financial Structure (ccc-, Moderate), and Financial
Flexibility (ccc+, Higher).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 20% weight for the forecast year 2026,
40% for the forecast year 2027 and 40% for the forecast year 2028.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b-'.

Wolseley Group Holdings Limited

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- Business and financial profile factors (assessment, relative
importance): Management (bb+, Lower), Sector Characteristics (bb+,
Moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning (bbb-, Lower),
Diversification and Asset Quality (b+, Moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics (bb-, Moderate), Profitability (b-,
Moderate), Financial Structure (b-, Higher), and Financial
Flexibility (b+, Moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are based on custom CRT
financial period parameters: 25% weight for the forecast year 2026,
25% for the forecast year 2027, 25% for the forecast year 2028 and
25% for the forecast year 2029.

- B+ to CC considerations apply in its analysis and result in no
adjustment.

- The Governance assessment of 'Some Deficiencies' results in no
adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'b'.

RATING ACTIONS

   Entity/Debt            Rating                 Recovery    Prior
   -----------            ------                 --------    -----
Wolseley Group Finco Plc

   senior secured   LT     B+  Affirmed                 RR3   B+

Quimper AB          

                    LT IDR B+  Affirmed                       B+
   senior secured   LT     B+  Affirmed                 RR4   B+

Travis Perkins Plc

                    LT IDR BB+ Affirmed                       BB+
                    ST IDR B   Affirmed                       B

Wolseley Group
Holdings Limited   

                    LT IDR  B   Affirmed                       B

Winterfell
Financing S.a.r.l.  

                   LT IDR  B- Rating Watch Maintained         B-
    senior secured LT      B- Rating Watch Maintained   RR4   B-


[] Fitch Affirms Ratings on Four EMEA Packaged Food Companies
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed four EMEA packaged food companies' and
their associated entities' ratings:

   1. Nomad Foods Limited
   2. Premier Foods plc
   3. Ulker Biskuvi Sanayi A.S.
   4. United Petfood Holdco B.V.

These actions follow the update of Fitch's Corporate Rating
Criteria and the Sector Navigators - Addendum to the Corporate
Rating Criteria on January 9, 2026. The companies' ratings and
Outlooks are unaffected by the criteria changes.

Corporate Rating Tool Inputs and Scores

Nomad Foods Limited

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its Corporate Rating Tool
(CRT) to produce the Standalone Credit Profile (SCP):

- The business and financial profile factors are assessed ( in the
format of the 'assessment', followed by relative importance) as
follows: Management ('bbb-', lower), Sector Characteristics ('bb+',
moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning ('bb', higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality ('bb', moderate), Company
Operational Characteristics ('bb+', moderate), Profitability
('bbb', moderate), Financial Structure ('bb', higher), and
Financial Flexibility ('bb', moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are assessed based on
custom financial period parameters of 20% weight for the historical
fiscal year 2024, and 20% for each of the forecast years 2025,
2026, 2027 and 2028.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bb'.

Premier Foods plc

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- The business and financial profile factors are assessed (in the
format of the 'assessment', followed by relative importance) as
follows: Management ('bbb', lower), Sector Characteristics ('bb+',
moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning ('bb', higher),
Diversification and Asset Quality ('bb-', higher), Company
Operational Characteristics ('bbb+', moderate), Profitability
('a-', moderate), Financial Structure ('aa+', lower), and Financial
Flexibility ('bbb+', moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are assessed based on
standard financial period parameters of 20% weight for the
historical FY24 (financial year ending March 2024), 40% for the
forecast FY25 and 40% for the forecast FY26.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'aa-' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bb+'.

Ulker Biskuvi Sanayi A.S.

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- The business and financial profile factors are assessed (in the
format of the 'assessment', followed by relative importance) as
follows: Management ('bbb-', moderate), Sector Characteristics
('bbb', moderate), Market and Competitive Positioning ('bb',
higher), Diversification and Asset Quality ('bb+', moderate),
Company Operational Characteristics ('bbb-', moderate),
Profitability ('bbb-', lower), Financial Structure ('bbb+',
moderate), and Financial Flexibility ('bb-', higher).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are assessed based on
standard financial period parameters of 20% weight for the
historical fiscal year 2024, 40% for the forecast year 2025 and 40%
for the forecast year 2026.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'bb' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bb'.

United Petfood Holdco B.V.

Fitch scored the issuer as follows, using its CRT to produce the
SCP:

- The business and financial profile factors are assessed (in the
format of the 'assessment', followed by relative importance) as
follows: Management ('bb+', moderate), Sector Characteristics
('bbb-', lower), Market and Competitive Positioning ('bb-',
higher), Diversification and Asset Quality ('b+', higher), Company
Operational Characteristics ('bb+', moderate), Profitability
('bbb+', lower), Financial Structure ('bb+', moderate), and
Financial Flexibility ('bb+', moderate).

- The quantitative financial subfactors are assessed based on
custom financial period parameters of 20% weight for the forecast
fiscal year 2025, 40% for the forecast year 2026 and 40% for the
forecast year 2027.

- The Governance assessment of 'Good' results in no adjustment.

- The Operating Environment assessment of 'a+' results in no
adjustment.

- The SCP is 'bb-'.

RATING ACTIONS

   Entity/Debt                Rating           Recovery   Prior
   -----------                ------           --------   -----
123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456
Nomad Foods Lux S.a.r.l.

   senior secured         LT     BB+  Affirmed    RR2       BB+

Nomad Foods Limited     

                          LT IDR BB   Affirmed              BB

Nomad Foods Europe
Midco Limited

   senior secured         LT     BB+  Affirmed    RR2       BB+

Nomad Foods US LLC

   senior secured         LT     BB+  Affirmed    RR2       BB+

United Petfood Finance

   senior secured         LT     BB+  Affirmed   RR2        BB+

United Petfood Holdco B.V.

                          LT IDR BB-  Affirmed               BB-

Ulker Biskuvi Sanayi A.S.

                          LT IDR BB   Affirmed               BB
   senior unsecured       LT     BB   Affirmed   RR4         BB

Premier Foods plc       

                          LT IDR BB+  Affirmed               BB+

Nomad Foods BondCo Plc

   senior secured         LT     BB+  Affirmed   RR2         BB+

Premier Foods Finance plc

   senior unsecured       LT     BB+  Affirmed   RR4         BB+



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2026.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *