250908.mbx
T R O U B L E D C O M P A N Y R E P O R T E R
E U R O P E
Monday, September 8, 2025, Vol. 26, No. 179
Headlines
G E O R G I A
SILK ROAD: Fitch Assigns 'BB-' Long-Term IDR, Outlook Stable
SILK ROAD: Moody's Assigns First Time 'B1' Corporate Family Rating
I R E L A N D
CIFC FUNDING VII: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating to Class F Notes
HARVEST CLO XX: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating to Class F-R Notes
SADEREA LIMITED: Moody's Cuts Rating on Sr. Secured Bonds to Ca
SC AUSTRIA 2021: Moody's Ups Rating on EUR150.7MM B Notes from B2
SCULPTOR EUROPEAN II: Moody's Affirms B3 Rating on Class F-R Notes
L U X E M B O U R G
CULLINAN HOLDCO: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR, Off CreditWatch Negative
N E T H E R L A N D S
PETROBAS GLOBAL: Moody's Rates New Senior Unsecured Notes 'Ba1'
U N I T E D K I N G D O M
AETHEL CARE: Grant Thornton Named as Joint Administrators
BOTANIC WAY: KPMG Named as Administrators
GRADE (UK): Leading Named as Joint Administrators
KINSETSU LIMITED: Interpath Advisory Named as Joint Administrators
PIER 2 PIER: Exigen Group Named as Administrator
STARS UK: Moody's Affirms 'B2' CFR, Outlook Remains Stable
[] Asimacopoulos, Francies Join Sullivan & Cromwell's London Office
- - - - -
=============
G E O R G I A
=============
SILK ROAD: Fitch Assigns 'BB-' Long-Term IDR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Silk Road Group Holding LLC (Silk Road)
a Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of 'BB-' with a Stable
Rating Outlook. Fitch has also assigned an expected rating to Silk
Road's proposed senior unsecured notes of 'BB-(EXP)' with a
Recovery Rating of 'RR4'.
The ratings reflect Silk Road's ownership of Silknet, the
second-largest telecoms operator in Georgia with stable market
positions, as well as its profitable luxury hotel and casino
operations. These businesses generate strong internal cash flow,
which Fitch expects will be broadly sufficient to fund new real
estate development on Silk Road's own land. The ratings also
consider its expectation that EBITDA net leverage will stay below
2.5x. However, new construction execution risk, significant FX
exposure and the Georgian 'bb' economic environment may introduce
some volatility into Silk Road's future leverage.
Key Rating Drivers
Telecoms Shape Portfolio Profile: Silk Road's credit profile is
primarily shaped by its telecoms segment with Silknet, its
95%-controlled telecoms subsidiary, contributing approximately 90%
of EBITDA in 2024. Silk Road is organized as a diversified
conglomerate operating in the telecoms, hotels and casino, and real
estate and development segments, although with relatively small
absolute scale. While the contribution of other segments is likely
to increase, telecoms will remain by far the largest segment and
the key free cash flow (FCF) generating segment of the group.
Entrenched Telecoms Market Positions: Fitch expects Silknet to
broadly sustain its competitive positions in a highly consolidated
but also relatively stable and small market of 5.8 million mobile
and 1.2 million internet retail customers. Georgia is predominantly
serviced by two large operators, Magticom and Silknet, with the
third largest, Cellfie, significantly behind and other smaller
players holding just a fraction of the market. The regulator GNCC
estimates that Silknet's revenue market shares were 35% in mobile
and 34% in fixed broadband retail segments in 2Q25.
5G Spectrum Secured: Silknet managed to get sizable 5G spectrum in
June 2025, which successfully addressed its previous strategic
disadvantage versus competitors. Fitch currently views Silknet as
having reached broad spectrum parity with its peers.
Real Estate/Development Diversification: Silk Road has plans to
actively expand into real estate and development segments which
will provide some diversification benefits. Real estate and
property companies can sustain more leverage than telecoms, with up
to 10x EBITDA net leverage consistent with 'bb' EMEA real estate
and property navigator sub-factor for financial structure. New
development will be on land that is already fully owned by Silk
Road which, in Fitch's view, mitigates the execution risks.
However, new property development also entails risks of low market
demand/low occupancy and construction cost overruns and delays.
Subscale Hotel, Gaming Operations: Silk Road's hotel and casino
segment is subscale with only half a dozen hotels and casinos under
management, with gaming primarily supporting lodging. However,
hospitality operations contribute to more efficient management of
the company's real estate portfolio, with all hotels and casinos
fully owned. This segment is strongly cash generative, so it is not
weighing on the overall group profile.
Macroeconomic Uncertainty: The Outlook on Georgia's sovereign 'BB'
rating is Negative, reflecting weak international reserves and
heightened political risk. Fitch expects economic growth to remain
robust but projects GDP growth moderation to 5.6% in 2025 and 5.2%
in 2026, down from 9.4% in 2024.
High FX Mismatch: Silk Road has high FX exposure, with leverage
sensitive to changes in the lari exchange rate. All its debt after
the contemplated refinancing and over 70% of its capex are
FX-denominated, while nearly all revenue is in local currency.
Hotel revenues are soft pegged to FX which provides a degree of
natural hedge. The company is going to maintain sufficient FX cash
and potentially FX forward contracts to cover its short-term
opex/capex needs and coupon payments. Substantial FX risk is
reflected in conservative leverage thresholds.
Cash Diverted to New Development: Fitch projects that Silknet and
the incumbent hospitality operations will remain strongly cash flow
generative, with most of this internally generated cash invested
into new development. Silknet's EBITDA margins of above 55% and
moderate capex requirements of below 25% of revenues propel its
pre-dividend FCF margin to close to 30%. Overall, Fitch expects
Silroad's FCF generation to remain close to break-even until
stronger inflows from residential pre-sales push it into positive
territory, likely starting in 2028.
Moderate Leverage: Fitch projects Silk Road's net leverage to
remain below 2.5x even at the peak phase of the new development.
Cash generation, and ultimately net leverage, are sensitive to
pre-sale inflows and Fitch expects Silk Road to proactively adjust
the pace of new construction to this indicator. Deleveraging will
be supported by telecoms growth and stronger contribution of the
newly opened landmark Telegraph hotel in the hospitality segment.
Silk Road is targeting to manage its net leverage at below 2x, as
per its own definition.
Corporate Governance Improving: Fitch expects Silk Road to maintain
a good standard of corporate governance, including a fair
representation of independent directors on its board which is key
to balancing the influence of the majority shareholder. With Silk
Road's shareholders consolidating most of their commonly held
assets under Silk Road, Fitch believes the risk of exposure to
external shareholder projects is limited. Silk Road is ultimately
majority controlled by a single individual. Silknet is not a public
company, and key creditor protection provisions including
information disclosure are primarily implemented in its bond
documentation.
Peer Analysis
On the telecoms' side, Silk Road benefits from its established
customer franchise and the wide network of a fixed-line telecoms
incumbent, combined with a strong mobile business similar to
Kazakhtelecom JSC (BBB-/Stable) and Turk Telekomunikasyon A.S.
(BB-/Stable). However, Silknet is smaller in size and only the
second-largest telecoms operator in Georgia.
Silk Road's hotel operations have some similarity to FIVE Holdings
(BVI) Limited (B+/Stable) as both companies have a relatively small
scale and niche market positions. Silk Road's real estate portfolio
is comparable to that of Akropolis Group, UAB (BB+/Stable) from a
size and high asset concentration perspective, but the latter
company operates at much higher leverage.
Key Assumptions
- Mid-single-digit telecoms revenue growth on average in 2025-2028
- Hotel and casino revenues growing by low single digits in
2027-2028, with the opening of the Telegraph hotel providing a
boost in 2025 and, to a lesser degree, in 2026
- Fitch-defined EBITDA margin of slightly above 40% in 2025-2028,
with content-cost amortisation treated as operating cash expenses,
reducing EBITDA and capex
- Recurring capex at 13%-15% of revenues in 2025-2028, with project
capex into 5G and new construction adding close to 10% on top of
this
- Stable GEL80 million of dividends per annum in 2026-2028
- GEL/USD rate weakening to 3.0
Recovery Analysis
Fitch rates Silk Road's senior unsecured debt at 'BB-(EXP)' in
accordance with Fitch's "Corporates Recovery Ratings and Instrument
Ratings Criteria," under which Fitch applies a generic approach to
instrument notching for 'BB' rated issuers. Fitch labels Silk
Road's planned bond as second lien/Unsecured according to its
criteria, thus resulting in a Recovery Rating of 'RR4' with no
notching from its 'BB-' IDR.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade
- EBITDA net leverage rising above 2.5x on a sustained basis
without a clear path for deleveraging in the presence of
significant FX risks
- Stubbornly negative FCF generation leading to higher net leverage
potentially driven by an inability to achieve a significant amount
of pre-sale cash inflow
- A rise in corporate-governance risks due to, among other things,
related-party transactions or up-streaming excessive distributions
to shareholders
Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade
- Telecoms market leadership in key segments in Georgia combined
with stronger diversification into other segments while maintaining
positive FCF generation, comfortable liquidity and net leverage
sustainably managed at below 1.5x
Liquidity and Debt Structure
Silk Road is going to replace its entire debt, including at its
subsidiaries, with the proposed Eurobond with five-year maturity.
Post-refinancing, Silk Road expects to have above GEL300 million of
cash on the balance sheet that should cover its short-term coupon
payments and operating needs. Liquidity is supported by strong cash
flow generation in the telecoms and hotels segments.
Issuer Profile
Silk Road owns Silknet, Georgia's second-largest telecoms with over
30% market share in key mobile, broadband and pay-TV segments. It
also owns several luxury hotels, casinos, and residential and
office development projects on its own land in Georgia.
Date of Relevant Committee
28 August 2025
MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS
Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.
ESG Considerations
The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.
Entity/Debt Rating Recovery
----------- ------ --------
Silk Road Group
Holding LLC LT IDR BB- New Rating
senior unsecured LT BB-(EXP) Expected Rating RR4
SILK ROAD: Moody's Assigns First Time 'B1' Corporate Family Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has assigned a B1 long-term corporate family rating
and a B1-PD probability of default rating to Silk Road Group
Holding LLC (Silk Road Group or the company), a diversified holding
company operating in telecommunications, hospitality, real estate
development, and energy sectors in Georgia and parent company of
Silknet JSC (Silknet, B1 Stable).
Concurrently, Moody's have assigned a B1 rating to Silk Road
Group's proposed long-term $400 million backed senior unsecured
notes. The outlook is stable.
Moody's have also withdrawn the CFR and PDR of Silknet JSC and
taken no action on the existing B1 rating on the $300 million
senior unsecured notes due 2027 issued by Silknet JSC. The
instrument rating will be withdrawn after debt repayment.
Silk Road Group intends to use the proceeds from the notes issuance
primarily to refinance existing debt, including the senior
unsecured notes issued by Silknet, and support ongoing capital
expenditures across its telecommunications and real estate
development segments.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The B1 CFR primarily reflects the company's strong position in the
Georgian telecommunications market combined with its convergent
service offerings and consistent revenue growth, supported by
ongoing GDP growth in Georgia (Ba2 negative) as well as the growth
potential of its real estate operations; its high Moody's-adjusted
EBITDA margin; and a relatively prudent financial policy.
However, Silk Road Group's rating also reflects the relatively
small scale of its operations that are concentrated in one country,
with revenue of over $300 million; exposure to cyclical and
competitive markets in the hospitality division with earnings
linked to tourism which is vulnerable to shocks; execution risk
associated with development projects and its foreign-currency
exposure, given the mismatch between its US dollar-denominated debt
and mostly Georgian lari-denominated revenue.
Silknet contributes over 65% of total revenue and more than 85% of
cash flow generation of the group. Silknet benefits from solid
market shares and a well-invested network in the Georgian telecom
market which offers growth potential.
The company also benefits from the solid growth potential of Silk
Real Estate but is also subject to risks associated with its
exposure to hospitality and gaming sectors. The company operates
five hotels (three under Radisson brand), two casinos, and is
currently developing two real estate projects, Silk Towers in
Batumi and Sakanela in Tbilisi. Moody's expects the two projects
will significantly contribute to long-term revenue and will be
mainly financed through internal cash flows.
The company's revenue increased by 7% in 2024 to GEL841 million
(around $312 million), while it increased by 9% year on year in
2023. The company's Moody's adjusted EBITDA margin remained strong
at around 50% over the same period. The overall performance has
been largely supported by the telecommunications segment's solid
growth and margins, in contrast to the hospitality segment, which
has shown more variability and lower margin levels in part driven
by coronavirus pandemic and the increase in gaming taxes and salary
inflation in 2023 and 2024.
Moody's projects revenue growth in the mid-to-high single digits
over the next two years mainly driven by continued growth of
Silknet and the contribution from the recently opened Telegraph
Hotel which started operating in June 2025. EBITDA margins are
expected to remain around 46%-47% over the next two years.
Leverage is moderate, with Moody's-adjusted debt/EBITDA estimated
at 2.8x as of December 2025, reducing to 2.6x by 2027. Moody's
anticipates that free cash flow (FCF) after shareholder
distributions will remain negative through 2025, primarily due to
substantial non-recurring capital expenditures. While Moody's
expects FCF to become positive in 2026, this is contingent upon the
level of dividend payments and the potential for capital
expenditures to exceed Moody's initial expectations.
A comprehensive review of all credit ratings for the respective
issuer(s) has been conducted during a rating committee.
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE CONSIDERATIONS
Governance considerations under Moody's General Principles for
Assessing Environmental, Social and Governance Risks methodology
are relevant to Silk Road Group. Governance risks stem from a
degree of ownership concentration and its exposure to foreign
exchange volatility due to the fact that almost all of the
company's debt is USD-denominated while its revenues are
GEL-denominated. More positively, the rating takes into
consideration the company's experienced management team that has
demonstrated a track record of successful strategy execution at
Silknet JSC. These considerations are reflected in Silk Road
Group's Credit Impact Score (CIS) of 4.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity is adequate and supported by the company's cash balance
of GEL428 million as of June 2025 pro forma for the transaction (or
$157 million equivalent). However, it is constrained by the
significant non-recurring capex over the next 5 years, lack of
committed credit facilities and the presence of unhedged US dollar
bonds.
The company is subject to a put option obligation worth GEL71
million which could be exercised by Silknet's minority shareholder,
with anticipated payments beginning in 2026 and distributed over
six annual installments.
Moody's expects Silk Road Group to generate positive free cash flow
starting in 2026, which should enable the company to internally
finance its non-recurring capital expenditures. Moody's have also
assumed there is some flexibility regarding dividend payments.
STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS
Moody's rate the proposed $400 million senior unsecured notes at
B1, in line with the company's B1 corporate family rating. The
instrument rating reflects the absence of any meaningful
liabilities ranking behind or ahead of the senior unsecured notes.
RATING OUTLOOK
The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that Silk Road
Group will continue to grow its revenue and EBITDA over the next
12-18 months, and benefit from the relative stability of the
Georgian lari versus the US dollar, maintaining credit metrics in
line with the B1 rating. The stable outlook also assumed that the
company will maintain adequate liquidity and continue to adhere to
its stated financial policy.
FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS
Upward ratings pressure could develop if the company continues
building a track record of revenue growth and high margins while
increasing its scale and diversification such that Moody's-adjusted
gross debt/EBITDA reduces well below 2.5x on a sustained basis; it
improves its liquidity position, including a high cash balance that
allows it to withstand unexpected shocks; and maintains its prudent
financial policy including managing foreign-currency risk.
Moody's would also consider positively higher visibility into the
successful completion of ongoing development projects, specifically
demonstrated by sustained progress in pre-sale of apartments and
pre-leasing activity for the office space.
Downward ratings pressure could arise if the company's
Moody's-adjusted gross leverage increases towards 4.0x; FCF remains
negative on a sustained basis; liquidity deteriorates; or if it
fails to maintain a prudent financial policy or adopts a more
aggressive growth strategy, including increasing its exposure to
development activities that are not prudently commercialised or
funded.
PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY
The principal methodology used in these ratings was
Telecommunications Service Providers published in November 2023.
Silk Road Group's B1 rating is two notches below the scorecard
indicated outcome of Ba2. The difference reflects among other
factors, the company's concentration in Georgia, its exposure to
currency risk, a liquidity profile that is only adequate and the
absence of committed credit facilities.
COMPANY PROFILE
Silk Road Group operates across a diversified range of sectors of
the Georgian economy including telecommunications, hospitality, and
real estate development. The company reported GEL870 million in
revenues and GEL412 million in EBITDA for 2024, with total assets
valued at GEL1.75 billion. It operates 837 hotel rooms, 40 casino
tables, and 24 restaurants and clubs, and serves 2 million mobile
and 367,000 fixed broadband subscribers through its telecom arm,
Silknet.
=============
I R E L A N D
=============
CIFC FUNDING VII: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating to Class F Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to CIFC Funding European
CLO VII DAC's class A, B, C, D, E, and F notes. The issuer also
issued unrated subordinated notes.
The ratings assigned to CIFC Funding European CLO VII's notes
reflect S&P's assessment of:
-- The diversified collateral pool, which primarily comprises
broadly syndicated speculative-grade senior secured term loans and
bonds that are governed by collateral quality tests.
-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization.
-- The collateral manager's experienced team, which can affect the
performance of the rated notes through collateral selection,
ongoing portfolio management, and trading.
-- The transaction's legal structure, which is bankruptcy remote.
-- The transaction's counterparty risks, which are in line with
S&P's counterparty rating framework.
Portfolio benchmarks
S&P Global Ratings' weighted-average rating factor 2,827.50
Default rate dispersion 472.34
Weighted-average life (years) 4.66
Obligor diversity measure 175.99
Industry diversity measure 18.97
Regional diversity measure 1.22
Transaction key metrics
Portfolio weighted-average rating derived
from S&P's CDO evaluator B
'CCC' category rated assets (%) 0.50
'AAA' actual weighted-average recovery (%) 37.19
Actual weighted-average spread (%) 3.78
Actual weighted-average coupon (%) 5.02
Rationale
Under the transaction documents, the rated notes will pay quarterly
interest unless a frequency switch event occurs. Following this,
the notes will switch to semiannual payments. The portfolio's
reinvestment period will end 4.5 years after closing.
S&P said, "Our ratings reflect our assessment of the collateral
portfolio's credit quality, which has a weighted-average rating of
'B'. The portfolio is well-diversified, primarily comprising
broadly syndicated speculative-grade senior secured term loans and
bonds. Therefore, we have conducted our credit and cash flow
analysis by applying our criteria for corporate cash flow CDOs.
"In our cash flow analysis, we modeled a target par of EUR400
million. Additionally, we modeled the covenanted weighted-average
spread (3.75%), the covenanted weighted-average coupon (4.00%), and
the actual portfolio weighted-average recovery rates (WARR) for all
rated notes, except the class A notes, where we used the covenanted
WARR of 36.19%. We applied various cash flow stress scenarios,
using four different default patterns, in conjunction with
different interest rate stress scenarios for each liability rating
category.
"Until the end of the reinvestment period on March 4, 2030, the
collateral manager may substitute assets in the portfolio as long
as our CDO Monitor test is maintained or improved in relation to
the initial ratings on the notes. This test looks at the total
amount of losses that the transaction can sustain--as established
by the initial cash flows for each rating--and compares that with
the current portfolio's default potential plus par losses to date.
As a result, until the end of the reinvestment period, the
collateral manager may through trading deteriorate the
transaction's current risk profile, if the initial ratings are
maintained.
"Under our structured finance sovereign risk criteria, we consider
the transaction's exposure to country risk sufficiently mitigated
at the assigned ratings.
"The transaction's documented counterparty replacement and remedy
mechanisms adequately mitigate its exposure to counterparty risk
under our counterparty criteria.
"The transaction's legal structure and framework is bankruptcy
remote, in line with our legal criteria.
"The CLO is managed by CIFC Asset Management LLC, and the maximum
potential rating on the liabilities is 'AAA' under our operational
risk criteria.
"Following our analysis of the credit, cash flow, counterparty,
operational, and legal risks, we believe the ratings are
commensurate with the available credit enhancement for the class A
to F notes. Our credit and cash flow analysis indicates that the
available credit enhancement for the class B to E notes could
withstand stresses commensurate with higher ratings than those
assigned. However, as the CLO will be in its reinvestment phase
starting from closing--during which the transaction's credit risk
profile could deteriorate--we have capped our ratings on the
notes.
"Given our analysis of the credit, cash flow, counterparty,
operational, and legal risks, we believe our ratings are
commensurate with the available credit enhancement for all the
rated classes of notes.
"In addition to our standard analysis, to indicate how rising
pressures among speculative-grade corporates could affect our
ratings on European CLO transactions, we also included the
sensitivity of the ratings on the class A to E notes based on four
hypothetical scenarios.
"As our ratings analysis makes additional considerations before
assigning ratings in the 'CCC' category, and we would assign a 'B-'
rating if the criteria for assigning a 'CCC' category rating are
not met, we have not included the above scenario analysis results
for the class F notes."
Environmental, social, and governance
S&P said, "We regard the transaction's exposure to environmental,
social, and governance (ESG) credit factors as broadly in line with
our benchmark for the sector. Primarily due to the diversity of the
assets within CLOs, the exposure to environmental and social credit
factors is viewed as below average, while governance credit factors
are average. For this transaction, the documents prohibit or limit
certain assets from being related to certain activities.
Accordingly, since the exclusion of assets from these activities
does not result in material differences between the transaction and
our ESG benchmark for the sector, no specific adjustments have been
made in our rating analysis to account for any ESG-related risks or
opportunities."
CIFC Funding European CLO VII DAC is a European cash flow CLO
securitization of a revolving pool, comprising mainly
euro-denominated leveraged loans and bonds. The transaction is a
broadly syndicated CLO that is managed by CIFC Asset Management
LLC.
Ratings
Amount Credit
Class Rating* (mil. EUR) enhancement (%) Interest rate§
A AAA (sf) 248.00 38.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 1.31%
B AA (sf) 45.00 26.75 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 1.95%
C A (sf) 23.00 21.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 2.35%
D BBB- (sf) 28.00 14.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 3.10%
E BB- (sf) 18.00 9.50 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 5.60%
F B- (sf) 12.00 6.50 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 8.34%
Sub NR 32.10 N/A N/A
*The ratings assigned to the class A and B notes address timely
interest and ultimate principal payments. The ratings assigned to
the class C to F notes address ultimate interest and principal
payments.
§The payment frequency switches to semiannual and the index
switches to six-month EURIBOR when a frequency switch event occurs.
EURIBOR--Euro Interbank Offered Rate.
NR--Not rated.
HARVEST CLO XX: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating to Class F-R Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned credit ratings to Harvest CLO XX DAC's
class A-R, B-1-R, B-2-R, C-R, D-R, E-R, and F-R notes. At closing,
the issuer had unrated subordinated notes from the existing
transaction and issued an additional EUR13.60 million of
subordinated notes.
This transaction is a reset of the already existing transaction
that S&P did not rate. The existing classes of notes will be
refinanced with the proceeds from the issuance of the replacement
notes on the reset date.
Under the transaction documents, the rated notes will pay quarterly
interest, unless a frequency switch event occurs. Following such an
event, the notes would permanently switch to semiannual payments.
The portfolio's reinvestment period ends 4.61 years after closing;
the noncall period ends 1.5 years after closing.
The ratings reflect S&P's assessment of:
-- The diversified collateral pool, which primarily comprises
broadly syndicated speculative-grade senior secured term loans and
bonds that are governed by collateral quality tests.
-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization.
-- The experience of the collateral manager's team, which can
affect the performance of the rated notes through collateral
selection, ongoing portfolio management, and trading.
-- The transaction's legal structure, which is bankruptcy remote.
-- The transaction's counterparty risks, which are in line with
our counterparty rating framework.
Portfolio benchmarks
S&P Global Ratings' weighted-average rating factor 2,837.02
Default rate dispersion 533.72
Weighted-average life (years) 3.95
Weighted-average life extended to cover
the length of the reinvestment period (years) 4.61
Obligor diversity measure 137.76
Industry diversity measure 19.45
Regional diversity measure 1.31
Transaction key metrics
Portfolio weighted-average rating
derived from S&P's CDO evaluator B
'CCC' category rated assets (%) 3.20
Target 'AAA' weighted-average recovery (%) 36.92
Target floating-rate assets (%) 95.10
Target weighted-average spread 3.66
Target weighted-average coupon 4.41
S&P said, "The portfolio is well-diversified. Therefore, we have
conducted our credit and cash flow analysis by applying our
criteria for corporate cash flow CDOs.
"In our cash flow analysis, we used the EUR400 million target par
amount, the covenanted targeted weighted-average spread (3.55%),
and the covenanted targeted weighted-average coupon (4.40%), as
indicated by the collateral manager. We assumed the identified
weighted-average recovery rates at all rating levels. We applied
various cash flow stress scenarios, using four different default
patterns, in conjunction with different interest rate stress
scenarios, for each liability rating category.
"Our credit and cash flow analysis shows that the class B-1-R to
D-R notes benefit from break-even default rate and scenario default
rate cushions that we would typically consider to be in line with
higher ratings than those assigned. However, as the CLO is still in
its reinvestment phase, during which the transaction's credit risk
profile could deteriorate, we have capped our ratings on the notes.
The class A-R and E-R notes can withstand stresses commensurate
with the assigned ratings.
"For the class F-R notes, our credit and cash flow analysis
indicate that the available credit enhancement could withstand
stresses commensurate with a lower rating. However, we have applied
our 'CCC' rating criteria, resulting in a 'B- (sf)' rating on this
class of notes."
The ratings uplift for the class F-R notes reflects several key
factors, including:
-- The class F-R notes' available credit enhancement, which is in
the same range as that of other CLOs S&P has rated and that has
recently been issued in Europe.
-- The portfolio's average credit quality, which is similar to
other recent CLOs.
-- S&P's model generated BDR at the 'B-' rating level of 24.99%
(for a portfolio with a weighted-average life of 4.61 years),
versus if it was to consider a long-term sustainable default rate
of 3.2% for 4.61 years, which would result in a target default rate
of 14.76%.
-- S&P does not believe that there is a one-in-two chance of this
tranche defaulting.
-- S&P does not envision this tranche defaulting in the next 12-18
months.
S&P said, "Following this analysis, we consider that the available
credit enhancement for the class F-R notes is commensurate with the
assigned preliminary 'B- (sf)' rating.
"Until the end of the reinvestment period on April 15, 2030, the
collateral manager may substitute the assets in the portfolio, as
long the CDO Monitor test is maintained or improved in relation to
the initial ratings on the notes. This test looks at the total
amount of losses that the transaction can sustain, as established
by the initial cash flows for each rating, and compares that with
the current portfolio's default potential, plus par losses to date.
As a result, until the end of the reinvestment period, the
collateral manager may, through trading, cause the transaction's
credit risk profile to deteriorate.
"Under our structured finance sovereign risk criteria, the
transaction's exposure to country risk is sufficiently mitigated at
the assigned preliminary ratings.
"The transaction's documented counterparty replacement and remedy
mechanisms adequately mitigate its exposure to counterparty risk
under our current counterparty criteria.
"The transaction's legal structure and framework is bankruptcy
remote, in line with our legal criteria.
"Following our analysis of the credit, cash flow, counterparty,
operational, and legal risks, we believe our ratings are
commensurate with the available credit enhancement for the class
A-R to F-R notes.
"In addition to our standard analysis, to indicate how rising
pressures among speculative-grade corporates could affect our
ratings on European CLO transactions, we also assessed the
sensitivity of our ratings on the class A-R to E-R notes, based on
four hypothetical scenarios.
"As our ratings analysis includes additional considerations to be
incorporated before we would assign ratings in the 'CCC'
category--and we would assign a 'B-' rating if the criteria for
assigning a 'CCC' category rating are not met--we have not included
the above scenario analysis results for the class F-R notes."
Environmental, social, and governance
S&P said, "We regard the exposure to environmental, social, and
governance (ESG) credit factors in the transaction as being broadly
in line with our benchmark for the sector. Primarily due to the
diversity of the assets within CLOs, the exposure to environmental
credit factors is viewed as below average, social credit factors
are below average, and governance credit factors are average. For
this transaction, the documents prohibit assets from being related
to certain activities. Accordingly, since the exclusion of assets
from these industries does not result in material differences
between the transaction and our ESG benchmark for the sector, no
specific adjustments have been made in our rating analysis to
account for any ESG-related risks or opportunities."
Ratings
Amount Credit
Class Rating* (mil. EUR) enhancement (%) Interest rate§
A-R AAA (sf) 244.00 39.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 1.33%
B-1-R AA (sf) 38.50 28.13 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 2.00%
B-2-R AA (sf) 5.00 28.13 5.00%
C-R A (sf) 24.50 22.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 2.40%
D-R BBB- (sf) 29.00 14.75 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 3.40%
E-R BB- (sf) 20.00 9.75 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 5.75%
F-R B- (sf) 13.00 6.50 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 8.52%
Z NR 1.00 N/A N/A
Sub. NR 36.50 N/A N/A
Additional sub. NR 13.60 N/A N/A
*The ratings assigned to the class A-R, B-1-R, and B-2-R notes
address timely interest and ultimate principal payments. The
ratings assigned to the class C-R, D-R, E-R, and F-R notes address
ultimate interest and principal payments.
§Solely for modeling purposes as the actual spreads may vary at
pricing. The payment frequency permanently switches to semiannual
and the index switches to six-month EURIBOR when a frequency switch
event occurs.
EURIBOR--Euro Interbank Offered Rate.
NR--Not rated.
N/A--Not applicable.
Sub.--Subordinated.
SADEREA LIMITED: Moody's Cuts Rating on Sr. Secured Bonds to Ca
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has downgraded the rating on the following notes
issued by Saderea Limited:
US$253,189,000 (current outstanding US$117,774,025) 12.5 per cent.
Senior Secured Amortising Bonds due 2026 (the "repack notes"),
downgraded to Ca; previously on Oct 22, 2024 upgraded to Caa2
This transaction represents a repackaging of five promissory notes
issued by the Republic of Ghana ("collateral").
RATINGS RATIONALE
The rating action reflects the correction of an error. In the
previous action taken on October 22, 2024, the repack notes were
upgraded to Caa2 from Ca after the long term issuer ratings of
Ghana were upgraded following the government's substantial
restructuring of its debt. As a result of the restructuring,
Moody's assigned Caa2 ratings to the new debt instruments issued by
the government of Ghana, and withdrew the ratings of the
corresponding outstanding instruments at Ca. Because the collateral
underlying the repack notes was not part of this restructuring, the
rating of the repack notes should have remained at Ca.
There have been press reports of discussions between holders of the
repack notes and the government of Ghana regarding a potential
restructuring of the repack notes, but Moody's has been unable to
obtain information from the issuer. Following the rating action,
Moody's will withdraw the rating of the repack notes due to
insufficient or otherwise inadequate information to support the
maintenance of such ratings.
Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:
The principal methodology used in this rating was "Repackaged
Securities" published in June 2024.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the rating:
Moody's will withdraw the ratings of all outstanding tranches.
SC AUSTRIA 2021: Moody's Ups Rating on EUR150.7MM B Notes from B2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has upgraded the rating of Class B Notes in SC
Austria Consumer Loan 2021 Designated Activity Company. The rating
action reflects the increased level of credit enhancement and
Moody's assessments of the likelihood of prolonged missed interest
for the affected notes.
Moody's affirmed the rating of the notes that had sufficient credit
enhancement to maintain their current rating.
EUR730.1M Class A Notes, Affirmed Aaa (sf); previously on Feb 17,
2022 Assigned Aaa (sf)
EUR150.7M Class B Notes, Upgraded to Baa1 (sf); previously on Feb
17, 2022 Assigned B2 (sf)
RATINGS RATIONALE
The rating action is prompted by an increase in credit enhancement
for the affected tranches and by Moody's assessments of the
likelihood of prolonged missed interest for the affected notes.
Increase in Available Credit Enhancement
Sequential amortization led to the increase in the credit
enhancement available in this transaction.
For instance, the credit enhancement for the Class B tranche
affected by the rating action increased to 9.1% as of July 2025
payment date from 7.3% since closing.
Assessment of the likelihood of prolonged missed interest
At any Interest Payment Date ("IPD"), the interest of Class B Notes
will be subordinated to the repayment of Class A Notes, should the
Collateral Ratio be lower than the Initial Collateral Ratio
determined at closing. The level of the Collateral Ratio at July
2025 IPD was 110.4%, while the Initial Collateral Ratio stands at
107.8%. Moody's analysis considered the likelihood of this
subordination trigger being hit and the likelihood of ultimate
repayment of deferred interest, factoring in the current levels of
credit enhancement and the performance of the portfolio.
Key Collateral Assumptions
As part of the rating action, Moody's reassessed Moody's expected
default rate and recovery rate assumptions for the portfolio
reflecting the collateral performance to date.
The performance of the transaction has continued to be stable in
the last year. 60 days plus arrears currently stand at 0.36% of
current pool balance showing a stable trend over the past year.
Outstanding defaults currently stand at 9.96% of current pool
balance up from 8.48% a year earlier.
The current expected default rate assumption is 10.0% of the
current portfolio balance, corresponding to 8.0% on the original
balance, and the assumption for the fixed recovery rate is 25.0%.
Moody's reassessed Moody's Portfolio Credit Enhancement ("PCE")
assumption for this transaction. PCE reflects the credit
enhancement consistent with the highest rating achievable in
Austria. As a result, Moody's have maintained the PCE assumption at
19.0%.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's
Approach to Rating Consumer Loan-Backed ABS" published in July
2024.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:
Factors or circumstances that could lead to an upgrade of the
rating include (1) performance of the underlying collateral that is
better than Moody's expected, (2) an increase in available credit
enhancement, (3) improvements in the credit quality of the
transaction counterparties and (4) a decrease in sovereign risk.
Factors or circumstances that could lead to a downgrade of the
ratings include (1) an increase in sovereign risk, (2) performance
of the underlying collateral that is worse than Moody's expected,
(3) deterioration in the notes' available credit enhancement and
(4) deterioration in the credit quality of the transaction
counterparties.
SCULPTOR EUROPEAN II: Moody's Affirms B3 Rating on Class F-R Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has upgraded the ratings on the following notes
issued by Sculptor European CLO II DAC:
EUR37,000,000 Class B-R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2034, Upgraded to Aaa (sf); previously on May 7, 2021 Definitive
Rating Assigned Aa2 (sf)
EUR26,000,000 Class C-R Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034, Upgraded to A1 (sf); previously on May 7, 2021
Definitive Rating Assigned A2 (sf)
Moody's have also affirmed the ratings on the following notes:
EUR248,000,000 Class A-R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2034, Affirmed Aaa (sf); previously on May 7, 2021 Definitive
Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)
EUR27,000,000 Class D-R Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034, Affirmed Baa3 (sf); previously on May 7, 2021
Definitive Rating Assigned Baa3 (sf)
EUR22,000,000 Class E-R Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034, Affirmed Ba3 (sf); previously on May 7, 2021
Definitive Rating Assigned Ba3 (sf)
EUR12,000,000 Class F-R Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034, Affirmed B3 (sf); previously on May 7, 2021
Definitive Rating Assigned B3 (sf)
Sculptor European CLO II DAC, issued in September 2017 and
refinanced in May 2021, is a collateralised loan obligation (CLO)
backed by a portfolio of mostly high-yield senior secured European
loans. The portfolio is managed by Sculptor Europe Loan Management
Limited. The transaction's reinvestment period ended in July 2025.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The rating upgrades on the Class B-R and Class C-R notes are
primarily a result of the transaction having reached the end of the
reinvestment period in July 2025.
The affirmations on the ratings on the Class A-R, Class D-R, Class
E-R and Class F-R notes are primarily a result of the expected
losses on the notes remaining consistent with their current rating
levels, after taking into account the CLO's latest portfolio, its
relevant structural features and its actual over-collateralisation
ratios.
In light of reinvestment restrictions during the amortisation
period, and therefore the limited ability to effect significant
changes to the current collateral pool, Moody's analysed the deal
assuming a higher likelihood that the collateral pool
characteristics would maintain an adequate buffer relative to
certain covenant requirements.
The key model inputs Moody's uses in Moody's analysis, such as par,
weighted average rating factor, diversity score and the weighted
average recovery rate, are based on its published methodology and
could differ from the trustee's reported numbers.
In its base case, Moody's used the following assumptions:
Performing par and principal proceeds balance: EUR392.6m
Defaulted Securities: EUR3.6m
Diversity Score: 57
Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2886
Weighted Average Life (WAL): 4.24 years
Weighted Average Spread (WAS) (before accounting for Euribor
floors): 3.71%
Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 43.77%
Par haircut in OC tests and interest diversion test: none
The default probability derives from the credit quality of the
collateral pool and Moody's expectations of the remaining life of
the collateral pool. The estimated average recovery rate on future
defaults is based primarily on the seniority of the assets in the
collateral pool. In each case, historical and market performance
and a collateral manager's latitude to trade collateral are also
relevant factors. Moody's incorporates these default and recovery
characteristics of the collateral pool into its cash flow model
analysis, subjecting them to stresses as a function of the target
rating of each CLO liability it is analysing.
Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:
The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
May 2024.
Counterparty Exposure:
The rating action took into consideration the notes' exposure to
relevant counterparties, such as account bank, using the
methodology "Structured Finance Counterparty Risks" published in
May 2025. Moody's concluded the ratings of the notes are not
constrained by these risks.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:
The rated notes' performance is subject to uncertainty. The notes'
performance is sensitive to the performance of the underlying
portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and credit conditions
that may change. The collateral manager's investment decisions and
management of the transaction will also affect the notes'
performance.
Additional uncertainty about performance is due to the following:
-- Portfolio amortisation: The main source of uncertainty in this
transaction is the pace of amortisation of the underlying
portfolio, which can vary significantly depending on market
conditions and have a significant impact on the notes' ratings.
Amortisation could accelerate as a consequence of high loan
prepayment levels or collateral sales by the collateral manager or
be delayed by an increase in loan amend-and-extend restructurings.
Fast amortisation would usually benefit the ratings of the notes
beginning with the notes having the highest prepayment priority.
-- Recovery of defaulted assets: Market value fluctuations in
trustee-reported defaulted assets and those Moody's assumes have
defaulted can result in volatility in the deal's
over-collateralisation levels. Further, the timing of recoveries
and the manager's decision whether to work out or sell defaulted
assets can also result in additional uncertainty. Moody's analysed
defaulted recoveries assuming the lower of the market price or the
recovery rate to account for potential volatility in market prices.
Recoveries higher than Moody's expectations would have a positive
impact on the notes' ratings.
In addition to the quantitative factors that Moody's explicitly
modelled, qualitative factors are part of the rating committee's
considerations. These qualitative factors include the structural
protections in the transaction, its recent performance given the
market environment, the legal environment, specific documentation
features, the collateral manager's track record and the potential
for selection bias in the portfolio. All information available to
rating committees, including macroeconomic forecasts, input from
Moody's other analytical groups, market factors, and judgments
regarding the nature and severity of credit stress on the
transactions, can influence the final rating decision.
===================
L U X E M B O U R G
===================
CULLINAN HOLDCO: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR, Off CreditWatch Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings removed the rating on Cullinan Holdco from
CreditWatch with negative implications, where S&P placed it on July
29, 2025. S&P affirmed its 'B-' issuer credit rating on Cullinan
Holdco.
S&P also assigned a 'B-' issue rating to Cullinan Holdco's new
senior secured notes maturing in 2029.
S&P assigned a negative outlook to Cullinan Holdco, reflecting that
it could lower the rating if the company cannot secure contracts
beyond 2026.
Cullinan Holdco completed a consent solicitation, removing the
immediate refinancing risk and improving its liquidity and maturity
profile. The company refinanced EUR630 million of existing
floating- and fixed-rate senior secured notes with EUR229.7 million
in new floating-rate senior secured notes (EURIBOR with a 0% floor
plus 6.20% per year), EUR347.6 million in new fixed-rate 8.50%
senior secured notes, and a EUR100 million RCF maturing in April
2029. S&P said, "While this action shifts the company's maturity
wall to 2029, we don't view the solicitation as a distressed
exchange because it provided adequate compensation to investors and
secured an extension of maturities, rather than a restructuring of
principal. We will continue to monitor Cullinan Holdco's liquidity
and liability management strategy, as the company's entire debt
maturity remains very concentrated in 2029."
Cullinan Holdco faces substantial recontracting exposure beginning
in 2027, exacerbated by a high concentration of
revenue--approximately 50%--derived from its largest U.K. customer.
This exposure is driven by the anticipated shift among major U.K.
electricity producers utilizing wood pellets from base load to peak
load generation, which could reduce this key customer's pellet
consumption by over 50%. While the extension of contracts for
difference supports biomass generation to 2031 and provides some
degree of visibility, S&P believes the overall level of monetary
support will likely result in lower biomass electricity production
between 2027 and 2031, potentially impacting Cullinan Holdco's
operating performance. Contracted volumes are primarily
concentrated among three large European customers: Drax Group
Holdings Ltd. (BB+/Stable/--), RWE AG (not rated), and Orsted A/S
(BBB-/Stable/A-3). This is a characteristic typical of the pellet
industry where producers secure large, long-term contracts,
resulting in significant revenue dependence on a limited number of
major buyers.
S&P said, "Revenue and earnings predictability is uncertain after
2027, primarily due to the upcoming renegotiation of a significant
U.K. customer contract, though a complete nonrenewal is less likely
in our view. Instead, we anticipate the possibility of reduced
volumes and less advantageous terms." Furthermore, the wood pellet
market faces uncertainty from 2027, with a potential oversupply
situation arising from a new U.K. subsidy scheme, which is expected
to substantially reduce pellet consumption and create a more
competitive market. Given that this key U.K. customer accounts for
roughly 15% of global pellet demand, any reduction in its volume
consumption will require pellet producers to secure new buyers to
maintain stable output levels.
Cullinan Holdco is expected to operate with elevated leverage in
the near term, moderated by its contracted earnings and a modest
reduction in debt. S&P said, "We project EBITDA for 2025 and 2026
to be largely or fully contracted at approximately EUR105
million-EUR110 million annually, resulting in an expected leverage
ratio of 5.5x-6.0x. This is despite the EUR55 million reduction in
bond debt. Our forecast for 2027 remains subject to significant
uncertainty, due to the lack of a firm contract, but we anticipate
lower volumes and reduced EBITDA contingent on contract renewals
and broader market conditions. Potential oversupply, driven by the
anticipated shift in U.K. pellet consumption as wood pellet-burning
electricity producers transition from base load to peak load
generation, could materially impact pellet pricing and overall
market equilibrium."
The negative outlook reflects the risk that S&P could lower the
rating if the company cannot secure contracts beyond 2026.
S&P could lower its rating if the company's credit quality
deteriorates due to a combination of factors, including
-- A substantial drop in volumes and EBITDA margins;
-- Sustained negative free operating cash flow;
-- EBITDA to cash interest coverage ratio approaching 1.0x; or
-- If liquidity weakens materially.
S&P said, "We could revise the outlook to stable if the company is
able to secure contract renewals with its key customers beyond
2026, providing enhanced visibility on volumes and pricing. We
could also revise the outlook to stable if the company demonstrated
a credible plan to offset any potential decline in secured volumes,
and on volume predictability after 2027."
=====================
N E T H E R L A N D S
=====================
PETROBAS GLOBAL: Moody's Rates New Senior Unsecured Notes 'Ba1'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has assigned a Ba1 rating to the proposed backed
senior unsecured notes due 2030 and 2036 to be issued by Petrobras
Global Finance B.V. and fully and unconditionally guaranteed by
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - PETROBRAS (Petrobras, Ba1 stable).
Petrobras' existing ratings including its Ba1 Corporate Family
Rating remains unchanged. The outlook is stable.
The proposed issuance will be used for general corporate purposes,
thus not affecting the company's debt protection metrics.
The rating of the proposed notes assumes that the final transaction
documents will not be materially different from draft legal
documentation reviewed by us to date and assume that these
agreements are legally valid, binding and enforceable.
RATINGS RATIONALE
Petrobras' Ba1 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) and ba1 Baseline
Credit Assessment (BCA), the measure of a company's standalone
credit risk without government support, reflect the company's
strong credit metrics for its rating category, and its track record
of operational and financial improvement. Despite being a
government-related entity, there is a low likelihood that Petrobras
will default as a result of sovereign credit distress because of
its solid financial metrics and capital structure; its low reliance
on domestic funding sources; its limited exposure to
foreign-currency risk as a result of the low share of the refining
business; and the fact that around 30% of its sales are related to
exports. In addition, Moody's expects the company's operating and
financial discipline to continue to support its cash generation,
which will help sustain its current capital structure.
Conversely, the company's rating is constrained by its exposure to
potential policy shifts and the risk of government interference in
its business decisions.
Leverage reduction has been a priority for Petrobras for several
years: Petrobras' gross debt target (including leases but not
pension liabilities) was $60 billion to be reached by the end of
2022, but it was achieved in 3Q20. In 2024, with the aim of
providing greater flexibility in cash management, the company
revised its debt ceiling to $75 billion. As of June 2025, the
company's debt reached $68.1 billion, and Petrobras plans to
stabilize it at $65 billion. Petrobras reached its target ahead of
schedule by increasing operational efficiencies through
cost-reduction initiatives, and by lowering and postponing capital
investment plans during the coronavirus pandemic in 2020, aided by
higher crude oil prices in 2021 and asset sales. Leverage declined
to 1.8x as of the 12 months that ended June 2025 from 3.3x in 2020,
supported by solid refining margins, cost control and asset sales.
Moody's expects leverage to remain relatively stable in 2025 even
with the proposed issuance. Moody's assumes average Brent price of
$67.5/bbl for 2025 and $65/bbl for 2026.
Moody's expects the company's cash generation of around $32 billion
in 2025 to be more than enough to cover its annual debt maturities
of around $1.8 billion-$2.2 billion and annual capital spending of
about $23 billion through the period, allowing it to maintain
reported debt below $65 billion. In June 2025, Petrobras had $9.5
billion in cash and short-term investments. Additionally, its
liquidity is supported by its sizable committed revolving credit
facilities totaling $8.5 billion, fully available and maturing in
2026.
The proposed transaction is part of Petrobras' liability management
strategy and proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes.
Moody's continues to assume moderate default dependence between
Petrobras and the government.
RATING OUTLOOK
The stable outlook on Petrobras' ratings mirrors the stable outlook
on the Government of Brazil's sovereign rating and reflects Moody's
views that its credit profile will remain mostly unchanged over the
next 12-18 months.
FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS
Moody's could upgrade Petrobras' ratings if its credit metrics are
at least stable and there is evidence of significant reduced
exposure to adverse government influence; or if the Government of
Brazil's sovereign rating is upgraded.
Petrobras' ratings could be downgraded if its operating performance
deteriorates, or there are external factors that increase its
liquidity risk or debt leverage above current levels on a sustained
basis; if the quality of its corporate governance declines,
increasing its vulnerability to adverse government interference; or
if the Government of Brazil's sovereign rating is downgraded.
The methodologies used in these ratings were Integrated Oil and Gas
published in September 2022.
COMPANY PROFILE
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - PETROBRAS (Petrobras) is an integrated
energy company, with total assets of $215 billion and annual
revenue of $86.3 billion as of the 12 months that ended June 2025.
Petrobras dominates Brazil's oil and natural gas production, and
refining and fuel marketing sectors. The company also holds stakes
in the petrochemicals and power plant business segments. The
Brazilian government directly and indirectly owns about 36.6% of
Petrobras' outstanding capital stock and 50.3% of its voting
shares.
===========================
U N I T E D K I N G D O M
===========================
AETHEL CARE: Grant Thornton Named as Joint Administrators
---------------------------------------------------------
Aethel Care Homes Ltd was placed into administration proceedings in
the High Court of Justice, Business & Property Courts, Insolvency &
Companies List Chd, No 005646 of 2025, and Oliver Haunch, Daniel R
W Smith and Philip Stephenson of Grant Thornton UK Advisory & Tax
LLP, were appointed as joint administrators on Aug. 15, 2025.
Aethel Care operated residential nursing care facilities.
Its registered office is at c/o Grant Thornton UK Advisory & Tax
LLP, 11th Floor, Landmark St Peter's Square, 1 Oxford St,
Manchester, M1 4PB.
Its principal trading address is at 42 Berkeley Square, Mayfair,
London, W1J 5AW.
The joint administrators can be reached at:
Oliver Haunch
Grant Thornton UK Advisory & Tax LLP
8 Finsbury Circus, London
EC2M 7EA
Telephone: 020 7184 4300
-- and --
Philip Stephenson
Grant Thornton UK Advisory & Tax LLP
11th Floor, Landmark St Peter's Square
1 Oxford St, Manchester, M1 4PB
Telephone: 0161 953 6900
-- and --
Daniel R W Smith
Grant Thornton UK Advisory & Tax LLP
8 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7EA
Telephone: 020 7184 4300
For further information, contact:
CMU Support
Grant Thornton UK LLP
8 Finsbury Circus, London
EC2M 7EA
Tel No: 0161 953 6906
Email: cmusupport@uk.gt.com
BOTANIC WAY: KPMG Named as Administrators
-----------------------------------------
Botanic Way Limited was placed into administration proceedings in
the High Court Of Justice In Northern Ireland Chancery Division
(Company Insolvency) No 29755 of 2025, and James Neill and John
Donaldson of KPMG, were appointed as administrators on Aug. 19,
2025.
Botanic Way, trading as House Belfast, specialized in hotels and
similar accommodation.
Its registered office is at 59-63 Botanic Avenue, Belfast, Northern
Ireland, BT7 1JL.
The administrators can be reached at:
James Neill
John Donaldson
KPMG
The Soloist Building
1 Lanyon Place
Belfast BT1 3LP
Tel No: +44 28 9024 3377
GRADE (UK): Leading Named as Joint Administrators
-------------------------------------------------
Grade (UK) Limited was placed into administration proceedings in
the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in
Birmingham, Insolvency and Companies List (Chd) No 000420 of 2025,
and Jamie Playford and Michael Roome of Leading, were appointed as
joint administrators on Aug. 11, 2025.
Trading as Vision Plus, Grade (UK) operated in non-specialized
wholesale trade.
Its registered office and principal trading address is at Finch
Close, Lenton Lane Industrial Estate, Nottingham, NG7 2NN.
The joint administrators can be reached at:
Jamie Playford
Michael Roome
Leading
Lawrence House
5 St Andrews Hill
Norwich, NR2 1AD
Further details contact: Kimberley Wapplington on 01603 552028
KINSETSU LIMITED: Interpath Advisory Named as Joint Administrators
------------------------------------------------------------------
Kinsetsu Limited was placed into administration proceedings in the
High Court Of Justice in Northern Ireland Chancery Division
(Company Insolvency) No 2025/29746, and Stuart Irwin and Ian
Leonard of Interpath Advisory, were appointed as joint
administrators on Aug. 15, 2025.
Kinsetsu Limited specialized in information technology consultancy
activities.
Its registered office is at Unit A4 Harbour Court, 5 Heron Road,
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT3 9HB.
The joint administrators can be reached at:
Stuart Irwin
Interpath Advisory, Suite 402
The Kelvin, 17-25 College Square East
Belfast BT1 6DH
Tel No: +442890 021770
-- and --
Ian Leonard
Interpath Advisory
Suite 209, The Kelvin 17-25
College Square East Belfast BT1 6DH
+442890 021770
PIER 2 PIER: Exigen Group Named as Administrator
------------------------------------------------
Pier 2 Pier Care Services Ltd was placed into administration
proceedings in the High Court of Justice Court Number:
CR-2025-001103, and David Kemp and Richard Hunt of Exigen Group
Limited were appointed as administrators on Aug. 19, 2025.
Pier 2 Pier was a temporary employment agency.
Its registered office is at Warehouse W, 3 Western Gateway, Royal
Victoria Docks, London, E16 1BD.
Its principal trading address is at Stoke Abbott Road, Worthing,
BN11 1HJ.
The administrators can be reached at:
David Kemp
Richard Hunt
Exigen Group Limited
Warehouse W, 3 Western Gateway
Royal Victoria Docks, London
E16 1BD
Further details contact:
David Kemp
Tel No: 0207 538 2222
STARS UK: Moody's Affirms 'B2' CFR, Outlook Remains Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has affirmed all the ratings of Stars UK Bidco
Limited (Theramex or the company), including its B2 corporate
family rating, its B2-PD probability of default rating, and the B2
ratings of its senior secured bank credit facilities. The outlook
remains stable.
Theramex is a pharmaceutical sales and marketing organisation
focused on women's health. It benefits from a stable portfolio of
largely off-patent branded drugs, strong distribution capabilities,
particularly in its core Western European markets, and a stable to
growing market.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The B2 CFR reflects the company's: (1) relatively defensive product
portfolio with steady growth prospects; (2) leading positions in
niche segments with brand strength and good sales and marketing
capabilities; (3) balanced geographic footprint although with a
focus on Europe; and (4) high margins and profitability versus
generics players which also supports positive cash flow
generation.
The rating also reflects the company's: (1) limited scale as
measured by revenue and EBITDA; (2) degree of product concentration
and lack of therapeutic diversity; (3) asset-light business model
with supply chain disruption risk, and reliance on Teva
Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (Teva, Ba1 stable); (4) risks of
continued competitive and pricing pressures; and (5) high leverage
and use of debt to fund drug license acquisitions.
In June 2025, the company repaid the PIK instrument outside the
rated, restricted group. The transaction was funded through a mix
of additional debt raised by Theramex and cash from its balance
sheet. As a result, Moody's-adjusted debt/EBITDA remained high at
6.9x for the last twelve months to June 2025. However, given
Theramex's strong growth, Moody's expects leverage to move close to
6x by the end of 2025 and, if growth continues in 2026, leverage to
comfortably be in the range for the rating in 2026.
Theramex has also been performing strongly in 2025 so far with
solid EBITDA growth on the back of continued strength in its
menopause portfolio, especially the main product Systen, better
than expected performance in its osteoporosis segment
notwithstanding generic pressure on Actonel and supported by the
launch of Eladynos, while the contraception segment, especially
Zoely, has also been performing solidly. The fertility segment has
been performing weaker in 2025 due to specific issues in selected
markets, but this has been well offset by the positive
developments. Another launch, Yselty, is also likely to
increasingly contribute to revenue growth.
Theramex's cash flow generation, excluding the debt increase and
PIK instrument repayment, has also been solid in the first half of
2025 because of the growth and some working capital and capex
phasing effects.
LIQUIDITY
Theramex has good liquidity. At June 2025 the company held cash of
EUR53 million, and had a fully undrawn EUR130 million senior
secured revolving credit facility (RCF) due 2029. The RCF has a
springing maintenance covenant based on net leverage, tested if
drawn at 40% or more, for which Moody's expects substantial
headroom.
STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS
The B2 ratings on the company's senior secured term loan B and
senior secured RCF, borrowed by Stars UK Bidco Limited, are in line
with the CFR, reflecting the fact that they are the only debt
instruments in the capital structure. The facilities are secured
largely by share pledges and UK floating charges, and are subject
to an 80% guarantor coverage test.
RATING OUTLOOK
The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that Theramex will
be able to sustain its market position and performance track
record. As a result, the outlook assumes gradual revenue and EBITDA
growth and ensuing gross deleveraging as well as materially
positive free cash flow generation. The outlook also incorporates
Moody's expectations that the company will not embark on any
further materially releveraging debt-funded acquisitions or make
debt-funded shareholder distributions.
FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS
The ratings could be upgraded if revenue and EBITDA growth
continue, product and supplier concentration reduce, and
Moody's-adjusted leverage decreases below 4.5x on a sustainable
basis, and Moody's-adjusted free cash flow/debt increases
sustainably above 10%, and in the absence of shareholder
distributions and further material debt-funded acquisitions.
Theramex's ratings could be downgraded if revenue and EBITDA
decline organically or in case of significant supply, operational
or litigation issues, or Moody's-adjusted leverage fails to reduce
sustainably below 6.0x, including as a result of debt-funded
transactions, or free cash flow generation reduces to below 5% of
Moody's-adjusted debt on a sustained basis or the liquidity
position deteriorates materially.
PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY
The principal methodology used in these ratings was Pharmaceuticals
published in November 2021.
The net effect of any adjustments applied to rating factor scores
or scorecard outputs under the primary methodology(ies), if any,
was not material to the ratings addressed in this announcement.
CORPORATE PROFILE
Headquartered in London, UK, Theramex is primarily a sales and
marketing organisation focused on women's health pharmaceuticals.
Most of its portfolio is made up of branded off-patent and generic
prescription drugs acquired following the company's carve-out from
Teva in 2018. For the twelve months to June 2025, Theramex
generated revenue of EUR470 million. Theramex is owned by financial
sponsors Carlyle and PAI Partners following a secondary LBO which
closed in August 2022.
[] Asimacopoulos, Francies Join Sullivan & Cromwell's London Office
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP announced on Sept. 1 the next step forward
in its global strategic plan to enhance and expand its private
capital, restructuring and leveraged finance practices through a
combination of internal talent development and top-tier external
hires.
Kon Asimacopoulos and Michael Francies join the firm as partners in
S&C's London office, adding exceptional expertise that will further
strengthen the firm's ability to act on the most challenging
matters and cross-border mandates for its expanding global client
base. Their appointment follows the addition of leading financial
institutions lawyer Barnabas (Barney) Reynolds as a partner in
London in June.
"We are thrilled to welcome Kon and Mike to S&C. Kon and Mike are
preeminent lawyers who have built market-leading restructuring,
private capital and M&A practices in London and across Europe,"
said Sullivan & Cromwell Co-Chairs Robert Giuffra and Scott Miller.
"Kon and Mike will be cornerstones to our plans to continue growing
our global restructuring, private capital and M&A practices,
building on the thriving European private equity practice led by
Karan Dinamani. They will help us attract other leading lawyers and
enhance our reputation for delivering the highest-quality advice
across all of our practices."
Mr. Asimacopoulos is widely regarded as one of the top
restructuring lawyers globally and has been involved in many of the
most significant restructuring and litigation matters in recent
years. He is ranked in Band 1 for Restructuring/Insolvency by
Chambers UK, is a member of the Hall of Fame in Corporate
Restructuring & Insolvency for the Legal 500 and is named a Market
Leader in Restructuring and Insolvency in IFLR 1000. He has also
been named a "Global Elite Thought Leader" by Who's Who Legal. Mr.
Asimacopoulos will lead the firm's European Restructuring and
Special Situations Practice, co-lead the firm's global
restructuring practice with Andy Dietderich and Jim Bromley in New
York, and co-lead the London office alongside John
Horsfield-Bradbury.
"I'm delighted to join Sullivan & Cromwell, whose strong heritage
and track record uniquely position the firm to help clients
navigate the increased complexity of the transactional landscape,"
said Mr. Asimacopoulos. "At S&C, I look forward to partnering with
an extraordinary team of lawyers, and with Mike, whom I have known
for many years, at a time when clients are increasingly looking to
advisers for the most creative, thoughtful and proactive
solutions."
"S&C has built a leading global restructuring practice over the
past 15 years based on delivering the highest quality advice and
our intense focus on client results. We leverage a strong core
restructuring team with the full resources of the firm. Welcoming
Kon to our core team is another major step forward for our
practice. We could not be more excited about our growth trajectory
and the collaborative work ahead," said Messrs. Dietderich and
Bromley.
Mr. Francies has received numerous accolades over his storied
career, having advised on a broad range of public and private
transactions, both cross-border and domestic, across various
industry sectors. He has been listed in The Times' Law 100 "UK's
Most Powerful Lawyers" and named as the “most recommended Private
Equity lawyer in the UK by general counsel" for The Lawyer. He has
been ranked Band 1 in both Private Equity and Corporate/M&A by
Chambers UK and is one of only two London lawyers listed in the
Legal 500 Hall of Fame for both Private Equity and M&A.
"Having worked alongside S&C many times over the years, I have
observed the firm's complete dedication to consistent global
quality and client service. Its collaborative partnership culture
and commitment to excellence means S&C is delivering outstanding
results for financial sponsors and other private capital clients
facing the most complex and pressing challenges or transactions.
S&C's private capital practice is thriving, and I am incredibly
excited to partner with Kon and join forces with Karan to propel
growth in this critical area from London," said Mr. Francies.
"Kon and Mike join an incredible team of talented lawyers in Europe
as we continue to build out our successful private capital
business," said John Horsfield-Bradbury, managing partner of
S&C’s London office. "The addition now of these two market
leaders, and of Barney Reynolds earlier this year, further enhances
our ability to provide high levels of expertise, experience and
resources across integrated mandates from London. I am delighted
that Kon will partner with me to lead our London practice in the
next phase of S&C's growth."
About S&C's London Office
Sullivan & Cromwell's London office, established in 1972, is the
second-largest office of the firm. It serves as a natural focal
point for English law advice, as well as for cross-border European
and cross-continental transactions. The office serves major
corporate, financial institution, investment banking, private
equity, government, sovereign wealth, individual and family clients
throughout Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Gulf regions and
Central Asia, as well as our clients from outside these regions
with interests there. S&C London is unique in the scale, complexity
and significance of the work carried out in an office of its size.
About S&C's Restructuring and Special Situations
Practice
Sullivan & Cromwell's Restructuring and Special Situations Practice
represents debtors, creditors, owners, strategic investors and
litigation parties on matters around the world. The practice swept
all major awards in 2024, winning the American Lawyer “Dealmakers
of the Year,” “Bankruptcy Firm of the Year” by Benchmark
Litigation and a Law360 “Practice Group of the Year for
Bankruptcy”, in addition to numerous awards for major
transactions such as the global insolvencies of FTX and SVB
Financial (the holding company for Silicon Valley Bank).
About S&C's Private Equity Practice
Sullivan & Cromwell's Private Equity Practice represents many of
the world’s leading financial sponsors and private capital
investors on challenging and complex transactions globally, and has
acted for a number of them for decades. The practice maximizes the
impact of the firm’s deep expertise and multidisciplinary
approach to find novel solutions and deliver on the highest value
transactions – as demonstrated by having the largest average deal
size ($2.3 billion) for completed European private equity
transactions in 2024 according to Mergermarket. The firm has acted
for financial sponsors such as Advent, Apax, Ares, Centerbridge,
Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Rhone Capital and Silver Lake.
About Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a leading global law firm that advises
on major domestic and cross-border M&A, significant litigation and
corporate investigations, finance and corporate transactions, and
complex antitrust, regulatory, tax and estate planning matters. Our
firm’s hallmarks are the highest-quality independent advice and
intense dedication to solving client problems. Founded in 1879, S&C
has more than 900 lawyers located in offices in New York,
Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, Palo Alto, London, Frankfurt, Paris,
Brussels, Hong Kong, Beijing, Tokyo, Melbourne and Sydney.
*********
S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N
Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.
Copyright 2025. All rights reserved. ISSN 1529-2754.
This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.
Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.
The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each. For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.
* * * End of Transmission * * *