250827.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Wednesday, August 27, 2025, Vol. 26, No. 171

                           Headlines



F R A N C E

PICARD BONDCO: Fitch Affirms 'B' Long-Term IDR, Outlook Stable


I R E L A N D

FORTUNA 2024-1: Fitch Affirms 'BB-sf' Rating on Class F Notes
ST. PAUL'S IX: Fitch Affirms 'B-sf' Rating on Class F-R Notes


N E T H E R L A N D S

ACR I BV: Moody's Downgrades CFR to Caa1, Outlook Remains Negative


R U S S I A

ARTEL ELECTRONICS: Fitch Affirms 'B' LT IDR, Alters Outlook to Neg.


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

2TECH LIMITED: FRP Advisory Named as Administrators
BUCKINGHAM GROUP: BK Plus Limited Named as Administrator
CALON CARDIO: Stones & Co Insolvency Named as Administrators
CLAIRE'S ACCESSORIES: Interpath Ltd Named as Joint Administrators
CLAIRE'S EUROPEAN SERVICES: Leonard Curtis Named as Administrators

CLAIRE'S EUROPEAN: Interpath Ltd Named as Joint Administrators
DRINKS OF MANCHESTER: Clark Business Named as Joint Administrators
VERSARIEN GRAPHENE: Leonard Curtis Named as Joint Administrators

                           - - - - -


===========
F R A N C E
===========

PICARD BONDCO: Fitch Affirms 'B' Long-Term IDR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Picard Bondco S.A.'s (Picard) Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B' with a Stable Outlook and senior
unsecured rating for the EUR310 million fixed-rate notes at 'CCC+'
with a Recovery Rating of 'RR6'. Fitch has affirmed Picard Groupe
SAS's senior secured EUR650 million fixed-rate notes and
Lion/Polaris Lux 4 S.A.'s senior secured EUR775 million
floating-rate notes at 'B+' / 'RR3'.

Picard's aggressive financial policy constrains the rating. Fitch
expects EBITDAR leverage to remain close to the top threshold for
the rating at about 7x through FY28 (March year-end). However, the
company's robust business model and effective cost management
support high profitability and sustained positive FCF despite the
challenging environment.

The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation of a steady
operating performance, high but sustainable leverage, and adequate
coverage metrics. Picard's strong liquidity profile provides
flexibility to manage its upcoming vendor loan and second lien
maturities in 2027.

Key Rating Drivers

High Leverage Constrains Rating: Fitch expects Picard's EBITDAR
leverage to remain high at around 7.0x until the end of FY27,
leaving no room for additional debt at the current rating level.
Fitch reflects Picard's flexible lease terms and IFRS lease
liabilities in its leverage calculations, in line with its new
criteria. This adjustment reduced calculated gross leverage by
0.5x, compared with its earlier method, where Fitch capitalised its
lease proxy using an 8x multiple.

Stalled Vendor Loan Refinancing: Fitch previously expected Picard's
leverage to drop by mid-2025, assuming the vendor loan would be
repaid with cash proceeds from a minority stake sale at IGZ level.
The vendor loan matures in 2027, and Fitch treats it as debt. The
sale has been delayed but may occur in the coming months.
Completion of the sale would bring leverage down to 6.8x in FY26
and 6.5x in FY27, providing adding adequate leverage headroom under
the rating. Due to ongoing uncertainty about the vendor loan
take-out, Fitch continues to include it in its leverage
calculations.

Financial Policy Reset Not Evident: After the December 2024
transaction, through IGZ, the Zouari family owns 50.4% of Picard
and ICG owns 49.6%. The sale marked the exit of Lion Capital, the
company's main shareholder, which led frequent dividend
recapitalisations. Fitch views the funding of Lion's buyout by IGZ
as aggressive, adding debt at Picard and introducing shareholder
and vendor loans outside the restricted group. Although the new
ownership could lead to a more conservative financial policy, the
new owners will need to take creditor-friendly actions before Fitch
incorporates any positive elements in its credit view, given the
initial re-leveraging transaction.

Strong Profitability: EBITDA margin recovered in FY25 to 12.8% as
energy cost eased, after bottoming out in FY24 at 12%. Picard
slightly increased its gross margin above 44% and grew market share
by adapting its offering for price-conscious shoppers. Selective
price cuts and adapted offerings increased volume (+1.2%) and
partly offset lower average basket size (-2.0%), in turn mainly due
to calendar effects. Fitch expects Picard to maintain high margins
and protect market share while adapting effectively to consumer
trends. Picard's profit margins are high for the sector, supported
by its focus on own-brand products, premium offerings, and
structurally profitable asset-light expansion.

Steady Sales Growth: Picard's sales grew only 1.2% in FY25, below
Fitch's assumed 3%. However, Fitch still expects revenue will
increase an average of 3%-4% in FY26-FY29, due to modest
like-for-like growth and store additions. Picard has a strong
record of steady sales growth in France, driven by its diversified
and frequently renewed frozen food range, which meets various
consumer needs while retaining repeat customers. Like-for-like
sales grew an average of 1.6% annually from FY17-FY25; Fitch
expects a slightly lower rate of 1% through FY29. Picard is well
positioned to keep opening new stores to expand its physical
presence, both directly operated and franchised.

FCF Supports Cash Accumulation: Fitch expects Picard to generate
positive annual average FCF of around EUR50 million in FY26-FY29
(around 2.3% of sales), supported by limited working capital swings
and capex needs. The strong cash flow generation differentiates
Picard from many of its peers in food retail, offsetting its high
debt levels.

Robust Business Model: Picard's leadership in a niche market and
highly profitable own brand continue to underpin its business
model. The group was resilient during the pandemic and in the
recent inflationary environment as its price increases were only
partially offset by a decrease in volumes, while it successfully
increased its volume more recently offsetting basket average price
decline.

Peer Analysis

Picard's overall profile remains weaker than that of larger food
retail peers, such as Bellis Finco plc (ASDA; B+/Stable) or Market
Holdco 3 limited (Morrisons; B/Positive), due to its smaller scale
and weaker diversification in non-food products and services.
Picard is also smaller in sales than UK frozen food specialist WD
FF Limited (Iceland; B/Stable), but its materially stronger
profitability leads to an equivalent level of EBITDAR.

Picard's gross leverage at 7.4x at end-FY25 remain higher than its
peers. Iceland's EBITDAR gross leverage has fallen to about 5x in
FY25. Fitch also expects Morrisons to deleverage to near 6.0x and
ASDA to below 5.0x in FY25. However, Picard remains comparable in
terms of fixed charge coverage of around 1.8x.

Picard has strong brand awareness and customer loyalty, which is
key for its positioning as a market leader in the French frozen
food retail sector. Picard also has high profitability (EBITDAR
margin of around 17% versus Iceland's 7%), due to its unique
business model focused on own-brand products and premium
positioning. This makes it more comparable with food manufacturers
than its immediate food retailing peers. This differentiating
factor results in superior cash flow generation that supports
Picard's financial flexibility and satisfactory liquidity.

Key Assumptions

- Average revenue growth of 3.5% over FY26-FY29, driven by 1% Lfl
and store expansion and franchise growth

- Fitch continues to assume the same number of store openings per
year (around 40)

- EBITDA margin averaging at 13.0% in over FY26-FY29 (FY25: 12.8%)

- Capex averaging 3.1% of revenue over FY26-FY29

- Slightly negative working capital movements in FY26-FY29

- EUR120 million Vendor Loan maturing in December 2027 treated as
debt, refinanced with a similar instrument

- EUR310 million unsecured notes are refinanced at market rate by
mid-2026

Recovery Analysis

Fitch assumes that Picard would be considered a going-concern (GC)
in bankruptcy and that it would be reorganised rather than
liquidated. Fitch has assumed a 10% administrative claim in the
recovery analysis.

In its bespoke GC recovery analysis, Fitch estimates
post-restructuring EBITDA available to creditors of about EUR190
million, increased by EUR10 million compared to its previous
analysis due to the expansion in the store network seen in the past
three years leading to its assessment of a marginally increased
residual EBITDA value at distress derived from a larger network of
mostly owned stores.

Fitch also assumes a fully drawn EUR75 million RCF prior to
distress.

Fitch has maintained a distressed enterprise value/EBITDA multiple
at 6.0x, which reflects Picard's structurally cash-generative
business operations, despite its small scale.

Its waterfall analysis generates a ranked recovery for Picard's
existing EUR1.4 billion senior secured notes in the 'RR3' category,
resulting in a 'B+' rating, one notch above the IDR. The Recovery
Rating of its EUR310 million senior unsecured notes remains 'RR6',
with a rating of 'CCC+', two notches below the IDR.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- Deteriorating competitive position or sustained erosion in
like-for-like (LFL) sales growth, EBITDA and free cash flow margin,
for example, due to the inability to manage cost inflation, leading
to the inability to deleverage

- Subdued operating performance or evidence of a more aggressive
financial policy, including material dividend distributions leading
to EBITDAR leverage remaining above 7.0x on a sustained basis

- Diminished financial flexibility, due to a loss of financial
discipline, reduced liquidity headroom or operating EBITDAR
fixed-charge coverage permanently below 1.5x

- (CFO-Capex)/Debt remaining below 2.5% on a sustained basis

- Absence of credible refinancing options 12 months ahead of the
unsecured notes maturity

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- Continuation of solid operating performance, for example,
reflected in LFL revenue increases and rising EBITDA with strong
free cash flow margins in the mid-single digits

- EBITDAR leverage below 5.5x on a sustained basis, driven mostly
by debt prepayments, reflecting a commitment to more conservative
capital allocation

- Operating EBITDAR fixed-charge coverage above 2x on a sustained
basis

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Picard's liquidity is comfortable, with EUR152 million of
Fitch-adjusted unrestricted cash as of March 2025. The RCF of EUR75
million further improves the liquidity profile. Low capex intensity
and manageable working capital outflows provide for healthy
positive FCF generation that Fitch estimates will contribute to a
continuous liquidity improvement. However, the position is subject
to its 2027 unsecured note refinancing and currently unclear
prospects of its 2027 vendor loan repayment via new equity.

Issuer Profile

Picard is a French food retailer with a leading market share of 20%
in the highly specialised and niche frozen-food market.

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt                   Rating           Recovery   Prior
   -----------                   ------           --------   -----

Picard Groupe SAS

   senior secured          LT     B+   Affirmed     RR3      B+

Picard Bondco S.A.         LT IDR B    Affirmed              B

   senior unsecured        LT     CCC+ Affirmed     RR6      CCC+

Lion/Polaris Lux 4 S.A.

   senior secured          LT     B+   Affirmed     RR3      B+



=============
I R E L A N D
=============

FORTUNA 2024-1: Fitch Affirms 'BB-sf' Rating on Class F Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Fortuna Consumer Loan ABS 2023-1
Designated Activity Company's (Fortuna 2023-1) class C, D and E
notes and affirmed the class B notes. Fitch has also affirmed
Fortuna Consumer Loan ABS 2024-1 Designated Activity Company's
(Fortuna 2024-1) notes.

   Entity/Debt              Rating            Prior
   -----------              ------            -----
Fortuna Consumer Loan
ABS 2023-1 Designated
Activity Company

   B XS2585848992        LT AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
   C XS2585849297        LT AAAsf  Upgrade    AA+sf
   D XS2585849370        LT AAsf   Upgrade    Asf
   E XS2585849453        LT BBB+sf Upgrade    BBB-sf

Fortuna Consumer Loan
ABS 2024-1 Designated
Activity Company

   A XS2746123558        LT AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
   B XS2746464465        LT AAsf   Affirmed   AAsf
   C XS2746465272        LT Asf    Affirmed   Asf
   D XS2746465439        LT BBBsf  Affirmed   BBBsf
   E XS2746465785        LT BB+sf  Affirmed   BB+sf
   F XS2746465868        LT BB-sf  Affirmed   BB-sf

Transaction Summary

The transactions are true-sale securitisations of a pool of
unsecured consumer loans sold by auxmoney Investments Limited. The
transactions' 12-month revolving periods have ended. The
securitised consumer loan receivables are derived from loan
agreements between Sud-West-Kreditbank Finanzierung GmbH (SWK) and
individuals in Germany and brokered by auxmoney GmbH via its online
lending platform.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Asset Performance Fits Expectations: Fortuna 2023-1's portfolio
composition has migrated towards its limits in terms of score-class
distribution, meaning borrower credit quality has clearly
deteriorated. Nevertheless, arrears and default performance of both
transactions is comparable and in line with other Fitch-rated
Fortuna deals. Performance of both transactions is in line with its
base case expectations. Consequently, Fitch has maintained the
current remaining life default base cases at 12.5% for Fortuna
2023-1 and 11.6% for Fortuna 2024-1 with a multiple of 3.8x for
both deals. Base case recoveries also remain at 33% for both
transactions with a haircut of 55%.

CE Build-up Drives Upgrades: Fortuna 2023-1 has been amortising
sequentially since the end of the revolving period, leading to a
build-up of credit enhancement (CE) compared with the last
surveillance review. CE ranged between 18% and 70% for Fortuna
2023-1's class E to B notes compared with 12% and 67% at the last
review. The class A notes were repaid in June 2025. The CE build-up
has driven the upgrades. Fortuna 2024-1 has been paying pro-rata
since the end of its revolving period as no sequential amortisation
trigger has been hit. Consequently, CE has remained stable, leading
to the affirmation of the notes.

Servicing Continuity Risk Addressed: CreditConnect GmbH (not
rated), a subsidiary of auxmoney, is the servicer, with some
servicing duties performed by SWK. The deals do not have a back-up
servicer, but do have a back-up servicing facilitator. Fitch
believes that the back-up servicer facilitator, the split of
servicing duties between two entities, the high level of standby
arrangements and the liquidity reserve reduce the risk of servicer
discontinuity and payment interruptions of senior expenses and
interest on the rated notes.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

Unanticipated increases in default rates or decreases in recovery
rates producing larger losses than its assumptions could result in
negative rating action on the notes. The sensitivities below
describe the model-implied impact of a change in one of these input
variables.

Fortuna 2023-1:

Expected impact on the notes' ratings of increased defaults (class
B/C/D/E)

Increase default rates by 10%: 'AAAsf'/'AAAsf'/'AA-sf'/'BBB+sf'

Increase default rates by 25%: 'AAAsf'/'AAAsf'/'A+sf'/'BBBsf'

Increase default rates by 50%: 'AAAsf'/'AAsf'/'A-sf'/'BB+sf'

Expected impact on the notes' ratings of reduced recoveries (class
B/C/D/E)

Reduce recovery rates by 10%: 'AAAsf'/'AAAsf'/'AAsf'/'BBB+sf'

Reduce recovery rates by 25%: 'AAAsf'/'AAAsf'/'AAsf'/'BBB+sf'

Reduce recovery rates by 50%: 'AAAsf'/'AAAsf'/'AA-sf'/'BBBsf'

Expected impact on the notes' ratings of increased defaults and
reduced recoveries (class B/C/D/E)

Increase default rates by 10% and reduce recovery rates by 10%:
'AAAsf'/'AAAsf'/'AA-sf'/'BBBsf'

Increase default rates by 25% and reduce recovery rates by 25%:
'AAAsf'/'AA+sf'/'Asf'/'BBB-sf'

Increase default rates by 50% and reduce recovery rates by 50%:
'AAAsf'/'AA-sf'/'BBB+sf'/'BBsf'

Fortuna 2024-1:

Expected impact on the notes' ratings of increased defaults (class
A/B/C/D/E/F)

Increase default rates by 10%:
'AA+sf'/'AA-sf'/'BBB+sf'/'BBB-sf'/'BB+sf'/'BBsf'

Increase default rates by 25%:
'AAsf'/'Asf'/'BBBsf'/'BB+sf'/'BBsf'/'Bsf'

Increase default rates by 50%:
'A+sf'/'A-sf'/'BBB-sf'/'BBsf'/'Bsf'/'NRsf'

Expected impact on the notes' ratings of reduced recoveries (class
A/B/C/D/E/F)

Reduce recovery rates by 10%:
'AA+sf'/'AA-sf'/'A-sf'/'BBBsf'/'BB+sf'/'BBsf'

Reduce recovery rates by 25%:
'AA+sf'/'AA-sf'/'BBB+sf'/'BBB-sf'/'BB+sf'/'BBsf'

Reduce recovery rates by 50%:
'AA+sf'/'AA-sf'/'BBB+sf'/'BBB-sf'/'BBsf'/'B+sf'

Expected impact on the notes' ratings of increased defaults and
reduced recoveries (class A/B/C/D/E/F)

Increase default rates by 10% and reduce recovery rates by 10%:
'AA+sf'/'A+sf'/'BBB+sf'/'BBB-sf'/'BBsf'/'BB-sf'

Increase default rates by 25% and reduce recovery rates by 25%:
'AAsf'/'Asf'/'BBB-sf'/'BB+sf'/'BB-sf'/'CCCsf'

Increase default rates by 50% and reduce recovery rates by 50%:
'Asf'/'BBBsf'/'BB+sf'/'B+sf'/'NRsf'/'NRsf'

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

Lower defaults and smaller losses could lead to positive rating
action. Fortuna 2023-1's class B and C notes and Fortuna 2024-1's
class A notes are already at the highest rating on Fitch's scale
and cannot be upgraded. For the remaining notes in both
transactions, a simultaneous 25% decrease in defaults and 25%
increase in recoveries could result in up to three-notch upgrades.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

Fortuna Consumer Loan ABS 2023-1 Designated Activity Company

Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the
information it has received about the performance of the asset pool
and the transaction. Fitch has not reviewed the results of any
third party assessment of the asset portfolio information or
conducted a review of origination files as part of its ongoing
monitoring.

Prior to the transaction closing, Fitch reviewed the results of a
third party assessment conducted on the asset portfolio information
and concluded that there were no findings that affected the rating
analysis.Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to
above, Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the
agency's rating analysis according to its applicable rating
methodologies indicates that it is adequately reliable.

Fortuna Consumer Loan ABS 2024-1 Designated Activity Company

Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the
information it has received about the performance of the asset pool
and the transaction. Fitch has not reviewed the results of any
third party assessment of the asset portfolio information or
conducted a review of origination files as part of its ongoing
monitoring.

Prior to the transaction closing, Fitch reviewed the results of a
third party assessment conducted on the asset portfolio information
and concluded that there were no findings that affected the rating
analysis.

Prior to the transaction closing, Fitch conducted a review of a
small targeted sample of the originator's origination files and
found the information contained in the reviewed files to be
adequately consistent with the originator's policies and practices
and the other information provided to the agency about the asset
portfolio.

Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above,
Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's
rating analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies
indicates that it is adequately reliable.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

ST. PAUL'S IX: Fitch Affirms 'B-sf' Rating on Class F-R Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded St. Paul's CLO IX DAC's class C-R notes
to 'A+sf' from 'Asf' and affirmed the rest.

   Entity/Debt              Rating            Prior
   -----------              ------            -----
St. Paul's CLO IX DAC

   A-1-R XS2443906172    LT AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
   A-2-R XS2443906503    LT AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
   B-R XS2443906255      LT AAsf   Affirmed   AAsf
   C-R XS2443906768      LT A+sf   Upgrade    Asf
   D-R XS2443906925      LT BBB-sf Affirmed   BBB-sf
   E-R XS2443907147      LT BB-sf  Affirmed   BB-sf
   F-R XS2443907493      LT B-sf   Affirmed   B-sf

Transaction Summary

St. Paul's CLO IX DAC is a cash flow CLO comprising mostly senior
secured obligations. The transaction closed in May 2018 and was
subject to a reset in March 2022. It is managed by Intermediate
Capital Managers Limited and currently in its reinvestment period
until October 2026.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Performance Better Than Expected Case: Since Fitch's last rating
action in September 2024, the portfolio's performance has improved,
with defaulted assets now 0.3% of par, compared with 1.7% at the
latest review. Based on the last trustee report dated 9 July 2025,
the transaction is failing its Fitch 'CCC' and S&P 'CCC' tests, by
2.2% and 0.2% respectively. The transaction is currently about 1%
above par and passing all other tests, with a wide margin on the
current weighted average rating factor, weighted average recovery
rate and weighted average spread covenants. All this underpins
today's rating actions.

Manageable Refinancing Risk: The transaction has manageable near-
and medium-term refinancing risk, with only 1.7% of the assets in
the portfolio maturing by end-2026 and 6.5% in 2027, as calculated
by Fitch, in view of large default-rate cushions for each class of
notes. The transaction's performance has resulted in an increase on
the break-even default-rate cushions versus the last review, which
also drives the upgrade of the class C-R notes.

High Recovery Expectations: Senior secured obligations comprise
96.9% of the portfolio. Fitch views the recovery prospects for
these assets as more favourable than for second-lien, unsecured and
mezzanine assets. The Fitch-calculated weighted average recovery
rate of the current portfolio is 61.8%.

Diversified Portfolio: The portfolio is well-diversified across
obligors, countries and industries. The top 10 obligor
concentration, as calculated by Fitch, is 15.6%, and no obligor
represents more than 2.2% of the portfolio balance. Exposure to the
three-largest Fitch-defined industries is 32.3% as calculated by
the trustee. Fixed-rate assets reported by the trustee are at 6.9%
of the portfolio balance, which is well below the maximum covenant
of 15%.

Cash Flow Analysis: Fitch used a customised proprietary cash flow
model to replicate the principal and interest waterfalls and the
various structural features of the transaction, and to assess their
effectiveness, including the structural protection provided by
excess spread diverted through the par-value and interest-coverage
tests.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

Downgrades, which are based on the current portfolio, may occur if
the loss expectation is larger than assumed, due to unexpectedly
high levels of default and portfolio deterioration.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

Upgrades may result from stable portfolio credit quality and
deleveraging, leading to higher credit enhancement and excess
spread available to cover losses in the remaining portfolio.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the
information it has received about the performance of the asset pool
and the transaction. Fitch has not reviewed the results of any
third-party assessment of the asset portfolio information or
conducted a review of origination files as part of its ongoing
monitoring.

The majority of the underlying assets or risk-presenting entities
have ratings or credit opinions from Fitch and/or other Nationally
Recognised Statistical Rating Organisations and/or European
Securities and Markets Authority- registered rating agencies. Fitch
has relied on the practices of the relevant groups within Fitch
and/or other rating agencies to assess the asset portfolio
information or information on the risk-presenting entities.

Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above,
Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's
rating analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies
indicates that it is adequately reliable.

ESG Considerations

Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores for St. Paul's CLO IX
DAC.

In cases where Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores in
connection with the credit rating of a transaction, programme,
instrument or issuer, Fitch will disclose any ESG factor that is a
key rating driver in the key rating drivers section of the relevant
rating action commentary.



=====================
N E T H E R L A N D S
=====================

ACR I BV: Moody's Downgrades CFR to Caa1, Outlook Remains Negative
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings downgraded ACR I B.V.'s (AnQore or the company)
corporate family rating to Caa1 from B3 and probability of default
rating to Caa1-PD from B3-PD. Concurrently, Moody's downgraded the
instrument ratings of AnQore B.V.'s senior secured bank credit
facilities to Caa1 from B3. The outlook on both entities remains
negative.                

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating action reflects Moody's expectations that the company
will continue to generate negative Moody's-adjusted free cash flow
over the next 12 to 18 months despite this year's reduction in
gross debt. In addition, Moody's forecasts the company's
Moody's-adjusted gross leverage to remain higher than commensurate
for the previous rating. Moody's views AnQore's capital structure
as unsustainable and Moody's believes there are refinancing risks
associated with its debt, which matures in late 2027.

Moody's anticipates that the company will continue to face pressure
over the next 12-18 months due to a global oversupply of
acrylonitrile and macroeconomic uncertainties. Soft European demand
weighs negatively on many end markets for acrylonitrile and other
chemicals. Since the last rating action on AnQore in February this
year, the prospects of an uptick in demand worsened because of the
uncertainties around the US tariffs, which weakened consumer
sentiment and business investment.

Moody's forecasts the company's Moody's-adjusted gross leverage
(excluding the joint-venture disposal gain) will exceed 8.5x in
2025 and improve between of 7x-8x by 2026—approximately one year
ahead of its debt maturities. Moody's expects this level of
projected gross leverage to make a potential refinancing
challenging, particularly given Moody's forecasts include moderate
volume growth assumptions, which may not materialize under a more
pessimistic scenario. Generally, there are high uncertainties
attached to Moody's forecasts. Self-help measures are unlikely to
deliver a meaningful increase in EBITDA, as the company's cost
structure is already relatively lean, leaving future improvements
dependent on a market recovery, which is uncertain at this stage.

In the first half of 2025, sales volumes increased moderately
compared to the same period previous year. However,
company-adjusted pro-forma EBITDA fell to around EUR21 million in
H1-2025 from EUR36 million in H1-2024.

Earlier this year, AnQore repaid EUR80 million of its EUR300
million senior secured term loan B2 following the sale of its
shares in Circle Infra Partners. As part of the transaction,
lenders approved the exchange of the net leverage covenant against
a minimum liquidity covenant until Q1 2026.

OUTLOOK

The negative outlook on AnQore reflects the weak rating positioning
and the increased refinancing risks.

LIQUIDITY

Moody's views AnQore's liquidity as weak. Moody's forecasts
negative Moody's-adjusted FCF (after interest costs) over the next
12-18 months. As of the end June 2025, the company had around EUR16
million in cash and cash equivalent on balance sheet, and access to
an EUR55 million senior secured revolving credit facility (RCF) of
which EUR35 million were undrawn. Furthermore, the company has also
access to a EUR70 million factoring facility (EUR39 million were
drawn as of June). However, the availability of the factoring
program depends also on the amount of receivables that qualify as
eligible.

The company's cash balance experiences intra-year swings driven by
the timing of interest payments and fluctuations in working
capital. Until Q1-2026, the company needs to comply with a minimum
liquidity covenant (the definition of liquidity is broader than
just cash on balance) of EUR25 million. Moody's believes that there
is a risk that AnQore could breach its net leverage maintenance
covenant (after Q1-2026), especially under a downside scenario
where production volumes would not increase.

Another liquidity challenge will also be the turnaround in 2027 and
a potential refinancing transaction. Moody's believes that the
company needs to secure additional external sources of liquidity to
fund those, as Moody's do not expect it to generate sufficient
internal cash flow from operations.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's could upgrade AnQore's rating if the company's adjusted
debt to EBITDA is below 6x on a sustained basis; its liquidity
profile improves; and FCF turns positive again. A positive rating
action would also require more visibility on the refinancing of its
debt maturities.

Moody's could downgrade AnQore's rating if the company's liquidity
continues to weaken or operating performance does not improve. A
ratings downgrade could also be prompted if Moody's views on the
probability of a restructuring or distressed exchange increases, or
Moody's expectations on recovery in a default scenario, worsens.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Chemicals
published in October 2023.

The net effect of any adjustments applied to rating factor scores
or scorecard outputs under the primary methodology(ies), if any,
was not material to the ratings addressed in this announcement.

COMPANY PROFILE

Headquartered in the Netherlands, AnQore is a European producer of
acrylonitrile (ACN) and other co-products. The company operates a
275kt ACN plant at the Chemelot site in Geleen (Netherlands) with
two identical lines. The company is jointly owned by the private
equity firm CVC Capital Partners (65%) and DSM-Firmenich AG (A3
stable) (35%).



===========
R U S S I A
===========

ARTEL ELECTRONICS: Fitch Affirms 'B' LT IDR, Alters Outlook to Neg.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has revised Artel Electronics LLC's (AE) Outlook to
Negative from Stable. Fitch has also affirmed its Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'B'.

The Outlook revision reflects AE's weaker-than-expected revenues
and higher working capital outflows. This has led to FCF
deterioration and leverage above its rating sensitivity, which
Fitch expects to continue in the short term. These factors restrict
the company's financial flexibility and may increase liquidity
pressure.

The affirmation reflects its expectation of healthy profitability
margins from lower cost inflation despite weaker revenue, which
will support recovery in FCF and leverage. The IDR continues to
reflect AE's small scale, limited geographical diversification, and
exposure to intrinsic emerging-market and FX risks.

Key Rating Drivers

Weaker Domestic Revenues: Fitch expects Artel's revenue to decline
further by 12% in 2025 from the level in 2024, due to stronger
competition. Uzbekistan's accelerated accession to the World Trade
Organization (WTO) is introducing reforms that facilitate easier
market access for new international players. This results in its
expectation for some of Artel's long-standing, key partners to sell
directly to Uzbek customers, with material order volume decline for
Artel, and intensified pricing competition.

Fitch anticipates this trend will bottom-out in 2025, influenced
also by the impact of subsiding cost inflation, before gradually
recovering from 2026 onwards, when underlying demand dynamics
become more favourable.

Increased Leverage: AE's YE 2024 EBITDA leverage (3.3x)
significantly exceeded its prior expectation (2.5x) due to the
higher debt incurred to support working capital outflow on
accelerated payables repayment and higher trade receivable days.
While EBITDA also underperformed, Fitch expects a gradual
improvement in leverage on higher EBITDA from 2026 towards the 3.0x
negative rating sensitivity. The underperformance is mitigated by
still relatively modest leverage compared to diversified
manufacturing peers in this rating category and strong coverage
ratios.

Increase in Related-Party Guarantees: Artel noticeably increased
its related-party guarantees as of March 2025 to broadly double
from the level as of December 2023. Fitch does not include these
guarantees in Artel's debt or leverage calculation as all
underlying loans are secured by the borrowing parties' assets,
Artel is not the sole or primary guarantor, and there is no
indication of financial support from Artel to the borrowing parties
historically or in the future. However, Fitch considers the
increase a credit negative and would change its assessment of the
guarantees if the related parties underperform. This would likely
lead to a rating downgrade.

FCF Generation to Improve: Fitch anticipates stronger FCF to
support AE's liquidity, driven by higher EBITDA margin, lower capex
on muted volumes, and normalized working capital outflow. Artel is
shifting spending from its expansionary organic growth strategy in
regional markets to relocation of domestic resources in more
cost-effective local areas. Fitch expects working capital outflow
normalization to be driven by better management of trade payable
days, despite recent increases in trade receivable days and higher
inventory days on lower sales volume. Fitch forecasts FCF margin to
average 1%, despite dividends at a recently increased payout ratio
and high interest expenses.

Higher Profitability: Fitch expects AE to maintain its recently
improved EBITDA margin due to declining cost inflation and a more
favorable macroeconomic environment, despite high substitution risk
and the low-cost nature of the industry. AE maintains its
competitive edge over local peers on price and innovation.

Geographic Concentration Constrains Rating: AE's small scale and
limited export outreach remain a key rating limitation, despite
increased efforts towards market diversification. AE has weaker
geographic diversification relative to many of its diversified
manufacturing peers, which typically operate across a broader
regional footprint. In 2024, approximately 80% of AE's revenue was
from the Uzbek market, while all of its non-current assets are in
Uzbekistan. This increases the company's vulnerability to domestic
systemic risks.

Leading Market Position: AE is the leading household appliances
producer in Uzbekistan, with a market share of over 50% in six of
its nine revenue streams. Its strong market position, successful
long-term co-operation with well-recognised brands such as Shivaki,
its established production, and logistical network all act as
barriers to entry, reinforcing its negotiating power.

Peer Analysis

AE is considerably smaller than its direct peers Arcelik A.S.
(Local Currency (LC) IDR: BB-/Negative, Foreign Currency (FC) IDR:
BB-/Negative) and Vestel Elektronik Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. (LC IDR:
B-/Negative, FC IDR: B-/Negative). AE's limited geographic
diversification, with 80% of sales derived from Uzbekistan, in
comparison with Arcelik's 45% locally, is another contributing
factor to the multi-notch difference in their ratings. Fitch views
material exposure to emerging markets as a rating limitation for
these peers as it makes cash flow generation susceptible to
macroeconomic, political, and FX risks.

AE's position as a low-cost manufacturer in Uzbekistan and other
regional markets underpins its EBITDA and EBIT margin forecast of
about 16% and 12%, respectively. These are similar to other
diversified industrial companies such as Ahlstrom Holding 3 Oy
(B+/Negative), ams-OSRAM AG (B/Stable), and Ammega Group B.V.
(B-/Negative), but weaker than that of INNIO Group Holding GmbH
(B+/Positive). AE's relatively weak FCF margins are similar to
Ammega and ams-OSRAM, but weaker than Ahlstrom and Innio, driving
the one-notch rating difference.

AE's leverage is comparable to that of higher-rated peers, such as
Arcelik and Innio, and is considerably lower than that of Ammega,
Ahlstrom and ams-OSRAM.

Key Assumptions

- Revenue decline of about 12% in 2025 and average growth of about
3.5% per year during 2026-2028.

- EBITDA margin of just above 16% during 2025-2028, supported by
lower cost inflation.

- Normalised working capital outflows.

- Capex reduced to around 3% of sales over 2025-2028 on lower sales
and production refocus.

- Dividend payments of about UZS344 billion in 2025 and average
UZS360 billion from 2025.

- Regular refinancing of short-term debt.

- No M&A until 2028.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- EBITDA leverage above 3x on a sustained basis;

- FCF margin below 1%;

- EBITDA margin below 11%;

- Deterioration in liquidity, resulting in an inability to
refinance short-term debt.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- Sustainable and continuous track record of improved corporate
governance, including greater financial transparency;

- Improved geographical diversification, with a materially lower
reliance on the domestic market;

- FCF margin above 3% on a sustained basis;

- EBITDA leverage below 2x on a sustained basis and improved
liquidity.

Liquidity and Debt Structure

AE's liquidity is solely supported by cash, with no available
committed credit facilities, and it does not cover its short-term
debt obligations for 2025. Liquidity is further strained by an
expected negative FCF in 2025 on higher interest payments, while
Fitch expects lower working capital outflow dividend payments
compared to 2024. This is mitigated by AE's supportive, long-term
relationship with local banks enabling it to refinance its
short-term debt regularly. The low cash balance reflects AE's
business seasonality, with the strongest cash-generative months at
year-end, and high capex and working-capital swings.

AE's capital structure is concentrated with 88% of total debt
raised from a single source. AE significantly increased guarantees
provided to related parties.

Issuer Profile

AE is based in Uzbekistan (BB/Stable) and is a leading domestic
producer of household appliances and electronics.

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt                Rating         Prior
   -----------                ------         -----
Artel Electronics LLC   LT IDR B  Affirmed   B



===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

2TECH LIMITED: FRP Advisory Named as Administrators
---------------------------------------------------
2TECH Limited was placed into administration proceedings in the
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and
Wales, Insolvency & Companies List (ChD) Court Number:
CR-2025-005152, and Jonathan James Beard and John Walters of
Begbies Traynor (Central) LLP, were appointed as administrators on
Aug. 11, 2025.  

2TECH Limited specialized in wholesale and distribution.

Its registered office is at Barttelot Court, Barttelot Road,
Horsham, RH12 1DQ.

The administrators can be reached at:

         Jonathan James Beard
         John Walters
         Begbies Traynor (Central) LLP
         26 Stroudley Road, Brighton
         East Sussex BN1 4BH

Any person who requires further information may contact:
         
         Naomi Cooper
         Begbies Traynor (Central) LLP
         E-mail: Naomi.Cooper@btguk.com
         Telephone: 01273 322960

BUCKINGHAM GROUP: BK Plus Limited Named as Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------
Buckingham Group Contracting Limited was placed into administration
proceedings in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property
Courts in Birmingham Insolvency and Companies List (ChD), No No
000485 of 2023, and Richard Tonks of BK Plus Limited was appointed
as administrator on July 25, 2025.

Buckingham Group Contracting, fka Buckingham Plant Hire
(Contracting) Limited, specialized in construction.

Its principal trading address is at Blackpit Farm, Stowe,
Buckingham, MK18 5LJ.

The administrator can be reached at:

               Richard Tonks
               BK Plus Limited
               Azzurri House, Walsall Business Park
               Walsall Road, Walsall
               West Midlands, WS9 0RB

For further information contact:

                Katie Wells
                BK Plus Limited
                Tel No: 01922 922050
                Email: katie.wells@bkplus.co.uk

CALON CARDIO: Stones & Co Insolvency Named as Administrators
------------------------------------------------------------
Calon Cardio-Technology Ltd was placed into administration
proceedings in the High Court of Justice Business & Property Courts
of England & Wales No CR-2025-005228, and Gareth Stones of Stones &
Co Insolvency Practitioners Limited was appointed as administrator
on Aug. 7, 2025.  

Calon Cardio-Technology specialized in creation of an innovative
alternative to traditional heart implants for people in heart
failure.

Its registered office is at Unit 1b, Sandringham Park, Llansamlet,
Swansea, SA6 8PW.

The administrator can be reached at:

         Gareth Stones
         Stones & Co Insolvency Practitioners Limited
         63 Walter Road
         Swansea, SA1 4PT

Further details contact:

         Tina Leahy
         Telephone: 01792 654607
         Email: info@stonesandco.co.uk


CLAIRE'S ACCESSORIES: Interpath Ltd Named as Joint Administrators
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Claire's Accessories UK Ltd Limited was placed into administration
proceedings in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property
Courts of England and Wales, Insolvency and Companies list (ChD)
Court Number: CR-2025-005570, and William James Wright and
Christopher Robert Pole of Interpath Ltd were appointed as joint
administrators on Aug. 13, 2025.  

Claire's Accessories UK, trading as Claire's, specialized in the
retail sale of new goods in specialized stores.

Its registered office is at Interpath Ltd, 2nd Floor, 45 Church
Street, Birmingham, B3 2RT.

Its principal trading address is at Unit 4 Bromford Gate, Bromford
Lane, Birmingham, West Midlands, B24 8DW.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

                William James Wright
                Christopher Robert Pole
                Interpath Ltd
                10 Fleet Place
                2nd Floor, 45 Church Street
                Birmingham, B3 2RT

For further details contact:

                Alex Ashley
                Tel. No.: 0203 839 7799


CLAIRE'S EUROPEAN SERVICES: Leonard Curtis Named as Administrators
------------------------------------------------------------------
Claire's European Services Limited was placed into administration
proceedings in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property
Courts of England and Wales, Insolvency and Companies list (ChD)
Court Number: CR-2025-005571, and William James Wright and
Christopher Robert Pole of Interpath Ltd, were appointed as joint
administrators on Aug. 13, 2025.  

Claire's European Services specialized in business support
services.

Its registered office is at Interpath Ltd, 2nd Floor, 45 Church
Street, Birmingham, B3 2RT.

Its principal trading address is at Unit 4 Bromford Gate, Bromford
Lane, Birmingham, West Midlands, B24 8DW.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

                William James Wright
                Christopher Robert Pole
                Interpath Ltd
                10 Fleet Place
                2nd Floor, 45 Church Street
                Birmingham, B3 2RT

For further details contact:

                Alex Ashley
                Tel. No.: 0203 839 7799

CLAIRE'S EUROPEAN: Interpath Ltd Named as Joint Administrators
--------------------------------------------------------------
Claire's European Distribution Limited was placed into
administration proceedings in the High Court of Justice, Business
and Property Courts of England and Wales, Insolvency and Companies
list (ChD) Court Number: CR-2025-005572, and William James Wright
and Christopher Robert Pole of Interpath Ltd, were appointed as
joint administrators on Aug. 13, 2025.  

Claire's European provided non-specialised wholesale trade.

Its registered office is at Interpath Ltd, 2nd Floor, 45 Church
Street, Birmingham, B3 2RT.

Its principal trading address is at Unit 4 Bromford Gate, Bromford
Lane, Birmingham, West Midlands, B24 8DW.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

                William James Wright
                Christopher Robert Pole
                Interpath Ltd, 10 Fleet Place
                2nd Floor, 45 Church Street
                Birmingham, B3 2RT

For further details contact:

                Alex Ashley
                Tel. No.: 0203 839 7799

DRINKS OF MANCHESTER: Clark Business Named as Joint Administrators
------------------------------------------------------------------
Drinks of Manchester Limited was placed into administration
proceedings in the High Court of Justice Business and Property
Courts in Leeds Company and Insolvency List CHD No No 794 of 2025,
and Phil Clark and Dave Clark of Clark Business Recovery Limited,
were appointed as administrators on Aug. 13, 2025.  

Drinks of Manchester specialized in the distilling, rectifying and
blending of spirits.

Its registered office and principal trading address is at Arch,
10-15 Watson Street, Manchester, M3 4LP.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

              Phil Clark
              Dave Clark
              Clark Business Recovery Limited
              8 Fusion Court, Aberford Road
              Garforth, Leeds, LS25 2GH

For further details contact

             David Hines
             Tel No: 0113 243 8617
             Email: davidh@clarkbr.co.uk

VERSARIEN GRAPHENE: Leonard Curtis Named as Joint Administrators
----------------------------------------------------------------
Versarien Graphene Limited was placed into administration
proceedings in the High Court of Justice Business and Property
Courts of England and Wales, Insolvency & Companies List (ChD)
Court Number: CR-2025-005275, and Andrew Poxon and Andrew Knowles
of Leonard Curtis, were appointed as joint administrators on Aug.
11, 2025.  

Its registered office is at Units 1a-D Longhope Business Park,
Monmouth Road, Longhope, Gloucestershire GL17 0QZ.

Its principal trading address is at Unit 1a, d, Business Park,
Longhope GL17 0QZ.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

         Andrew Knowles
         Andrew Poxon
         Leonard Curtis
         Riverside House, Irwell Street
         Manchester, M3 5EN
         
Further details contact:

          The Joint Administrators
          Tel No: 0161 831 9999
          Email: recovery@leonardcurtis.co.uk

Alternative contact: Avery Lewis


                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2025.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *