250710.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Thursday, July 10, 2025, Vol. 26, No. 137

                           Headlines



F R A N C E

FINANCIERE VOLTA II: S&P Assigns 'B' LongTerm ICR, Outlook Stable
NORIA 2025: Fitch Assigns 'B+(EXP)sf' Rating on Class F Notes


G E O R G I A

GEORGIA GLOBAL: Fitch Alters Outlook on 'BB-' IDR to Positive


G E R M A N Y

HSE FINANCE: Moody's Appends LD to PDR on Restructuring Completion


I R E L A N D

AVOCA CLO XIV: Fitch Assigns 'B-sf' Final Rating on Cl. F-R-R Notes
BOSPHORUS CLO V: Fitch Affirms 'Bsf' Rating on Class F Notes
MAN GLG V: Fitch Affirms B-sf Rating on Class F Debt


I T A L Y

LA DORIA: Fitch Assigns Rates New EUR675MM Secured Notes 'BB-'
LA DORIA: Fitch Hikes LongTerm IDR to 'B+', Outlook Stable
OMNIA TECHNOLOGIES: Fitch Affirms 'B' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable


P O L A N D

DL INVEST: Fitch Assigns 'BB-' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Positive


R O M A N I A

ONIX ASIGURARI: A.M. Best Affirms B(Fair) Fin. Strength Rating


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

BISHOPSTROW COLLEGE: Grant Thornton Named as Administrators
CARNIVAL PLC: Fitch Rates EUR1-Bil. Unsecured Notes Due 2031 'BB+'
COGNITA: S&P Assigns 'B-' Rating on Term Loan Facilities
DRAIN PEOPLE: Exigen Group Named as Administrators
EG GROUP: Moody's Affirms 'B3' CFR & Alters Outlook to Positive

GORDON NICOLSON: JT Maxwell Named as Administrators
MAISON BIDCO: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B' on Ongoing Margin Pressure
NORTHERN REFRIGERATION: Leonard Curtis Named as Administrators
PADWORTH COLLEGE: Grant Thornton Named as Administrators
R3 IOT: AAB Business Named as Administrators

WD FF LIMITED: Fitch Affirms 'B' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable

                           - - - - -


===========
F R A N C E
===========

FINANCIERE VOLTA II: S&P Assigns 'B' LongTerm ICR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' long-term issuer credit rating
to Financiere Volta II SAS and its 'B' issue rating to its EUR320
million senior TLB issued by Financiere Volta SAS. The recovery
rating on the loan is '3', indicating our expectation of about 60%
recovery in the event of a payment default.

The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Lynxeo's operating
performance will improve in the next 12 months, thanks to price
increases with key customers and stronger demand conditions,
sustaining adjusted EBITDA margins at about 10% and debt to EBITDA
well below 5x from 2026 onward and representing sound rating
headroom at the 'B' level.

Private-equity firm Latour Capital closed the acquisition of
specialty cable manufacturer Lynxeo, a spin-off from France-based
cable-maker Nexans S.A., via its holding company Financiere Volta
II SAS, in a leveraged buyout transaction.

The EUR525 million transaction was funded by a EUR320 million term
loan B (TLB), issued by Financiere Volta SAS, a fully owned
financing subsidiary of Financiere Volta II, and a contribution
from Latour Capital that S&P fully sees as equity-like. In
addition, the company has about EUR40 million cash on hand at
closing and access to a EUR70 million committed revolving credit
facility (RCF).

S&P said, "We anticipate that Lynxeo's pro forma S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margin will remain resilient at about 8.6%
in 2025 (8.4% in 2024), despite still-subdued demand conditions,
mainly in the automation end market, and transaction costs (treated
as expense in our adjusted EBITDA for 2025), before improving to
more than 10% from 2026 onward thanks to lower one-off items,
volume recovery in some core segments, and positive pricing effects
on renegotiated contracts."

The company's adjusted leverage is relatively conservative compared
with similar transactions, with its S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
debt to EBITDA expected to be below 4.0x by 2026 after 4.8x in 2025
pro forma. At the same time, S&P factors in its rating assignment
the company's small size and limited diversity, a short track
record of operating independently from Nexans, and potential
movements in foreign exchange (FX) derivatives, which could lead to
more volatile cash flow metrics.

S&P said, "The 'B' rating reflects our expectation that Lynxeo will
maintain leverage well below 5.0x in 2026 thanks to a rebound in
sales and improved profitability. For 2025, we anticipate continued
soft demand, due to a delayed recovery in the automation segment
following an overall market downturn in 2024, and limited growth in
the transport and energy (T&E) Asia-Pacific segment after a record
year driven by high activity in the shipbuilding and oil and gas
(O&G) markets in 2024. We project that 2025 sales will decline 3.2%
to EUR848 million at current metal prices (or a 0.7% decline at
constant metal prices and fixed perimeter excluding sales to
Nexans), compared with a 4.6% decline in 2024 (or a 0.4% increase
at constant metal prices and fixed perimeter excluding sales to
Nexans). Overall, S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA this year
should remain relatively resilient at EUR70 million-EUR75 million,
broadly in line with 2024 levels, thanks to the company's efforts
to further improve its customer mix, translating into an adjusted
EBITDA margin of 8.6% (8.4% in 2024). This includes some
transaction fees and one-off carve-out costs that we treat as
expense in our adjusted EBITDA figure, and no negative FX effects.
In 2026, we expect top-line expansion of 6.0%-6.5% will be
supported by the anticipated upturn in the automation end market,
as well as more favorable pricing terms on some key contracts.
Along with lower one-off costs, we anticipate this will result in
the adjusted EBITDA margin improving to 10%-11% in 2026. We project
EBITDA expansion will enable material deleveraging, with adjusted
debt to EBITDA expected at 3.7x at year-end 2026 (compared with
4.8x in 2025).

"Our rating on Lynxeo is constrained by the group's private equity
ownership. Although we forecast that adjusted leverage will be
comfortably below 5x from 2026, which compares positively with
other private equity-owned rated peers, we also factor into our
assessment that the group is owned by a financial sponsor. We
estimate the company will have considerable headroom against the
financial covenant included in its senior facilities in 2026. We
think this could leave headroom for higher debt depending on the
financial sponsor's leverage tolerance, for which we do not yet
have a track record, although we understand that it will target to
maintain a prudent financial policy. We also think Lynxeo's
position as a pure-play industrial cable manufacturer in a highly
fragmented market presents acquisition opportunities, to expand the
group's presence in other parts of the value chain or higher-growth
end markets and regions. Therefore, we cannot rule out potential
incremental debt."

Although the industrial cables market is fragmented, Lynxeo holds
relatively strong positions as a specialty cable manufacturer in
its niche markets. The group is one of the top suppliers of
specialty cables for rolling stock and railway applications in
Europe and China, and for shipbuilding in South Korea. Lynxeo's
products are essential for the operations of infrastructure
equipment, as these cables underpin power delivery and data
transmission, and therefore carry a high cost of operational
failure despite generally representing less than 1% of the total
equipment cost. The cables are often tailored to specific design
requirements. This increases customer retention, as seen with the
company's long-term contractual relationships with tenures of over
10 years with key customers, also serving as a barrier to entry.
According to management, Lynxeo maintains a significant share of
wallet with key equipment manufacturers across its target sectors.
Nevertheless, it is a small-scale player compared with larger rated
capital goods peers, and it operates within a highly fragmented
industry despite its leading position in its niche markets. S&P
said, "Our business risk assessment is therefore constrained by the
company's narrower product portfolio than larger peers', consisting
of a large range of specialty cables; some geographical
concentration, as about 60% of the group's revenue in 2024 was from
Europe (split across different countries), where we expect growth
to remain more subdued than in other regions; and some customer
concentration, with the top 10 accounting for about 40% of sales in
2024, comparing negatively with higher-rated peers."

The mission-critical nature of Lynxeo's products and end-market
diversity mitigates the group's exposure to cyclical industries.
Lynxeo manufactures high-performance cables for diverse industrial
applications. At the same time, the company derives about 60% of
revenue from end markets sensitive to economic cycles and
fluctuations in industrial activity, including railways,
automation, shipbuilding, and aerospace, meaning that our forecasts
include uncertainty. S&P said, "We think this is partially offset
by the nondiscretionary and operationally critical role of
industrial cables, which should translate into resilient demand. In
addition, despite the cyclical nature of its core end markets, we
expect diversification across uncorrelated sectors will limit
earnings volatility. Increasing industrial electrification and
automation, the transition to renewable energy, and an aging
population driving health care needs should support long-term
demand for Lynxeo."

S&P said, "We anticipate the group will maintain relatively stable
S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margin of about 10% from 2026
onward. We anticipate that Lynxeo will benefit from the full
effects of its contract renegotiations in 2026, so margins will
materially improve to above 10% from 8.6% expected in 2025 (8.4% in
2024). We notably expect that Lynxeo will continue to achieve solid
operating margins within its aerospace and medical division and in
its T&E European division. This, coupled with an improved operating
environment in the automation division, should play a key role in
driving revenue and EBITDA expansion. The company makes use of
automatic pass-through mechanisms for copper prices, thus fully
neutralizing the impact of metal price fluctuations on the margins.
At the same time, FX gains and losses could cause some margin
volatility. We view FX gains and losses as operational and include
it in our EBITDA calculation because they arise from FX derivatives
used to hedge commercial transactions, including on copper volumes
typically settled in U.S. dollars.

"We expect Lynxeo's free operating cash flow (FOCF) to remain
consistently positive from 2026, thanks to lower one-off expenses
and improving profitability, although capital expenditure (capex)
will remain relatively high over the next three years. In 2025, we
forecast modestly negative FOCF, mainly constrained by nonrecurring
expense, including IT-related capex, and a temporary working
capital buildup of EUR30 million, driven by the one-off effect of
shorter payment terms with Korean suppliers than in the historical
period. The company absorbed the impact in early 2025 before the
closing of Latour Capital's investment. For 2026, we anticipate
that the company's FOCF will turn positive, supported by expanding
margins and working capital needs moderating to about EUR15 million
per year. Capex requirements will increase as the company plans to
invest in production automation and in its IT transformation
following the separation from Nexans, with estimated total
IT-related capex amounting to EUR22.5 million over 2025-2027.
Therefore, we project the capex-to-sales ratio will temporarily
increase to 3%-4%, from 1.3% in 2024.

"We treat the convertible bonds (CBs) subscribed by financial
sponsor Latour Capital as equity-like, in application of our
controlling shareholders financing criteria. This is because the
CBs bear a payment-in-kind interest and have a maturity date later
than that the senior debt. CB holders are subordinated in all
rights to senior debt under the terms of the intercreditor and
senior facilities agreements. The documentation of the CBs includes
an early redemption clause for the CB holders, but this could only
be exercised if Lynxeo is in a distressed or default-like situation
(corporate filing or equivalent), or its capital structure is being
refinanced (IPO, merger, or change in control). In both
circumstances, we would fully reassess the issuer credit rating.
Also, the senior facility agreement's permitted payments could
result in a limited amount of cash returned to CB holders or any
other junior creditors, equivalent to a maximum of EUR20 million or
approximately 25% of covenant EBITDA (which we estimate could mean
only up to EUR20 million-EUR30 million returned anytime). Permitted
payments are also capped by a leverage test, with covenant net debt
to EBITDA to remain below 2.75x in case of debt-funded payment or
3.25x in case of cash-funded distribution. As a result, we view
limited risk of material releveraging from the CB terms and debt
documentation. In addition to its contribution via the CB
instruments, Latour Capital also provided common equity as part of
the transaction.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Lynxeo's
operating performance will improve in the next 12 months thanks to
price increases with key customers and demand improvement
sustaining S&P Global Ratings-adjusted margins at about 10% from
2026 onward. As a result, we expect that the group's S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA ratio will improve well below 5x by
2026, and that its FOCF will remain consistently positive from
2026, while its funds from operations (FFO) cash interest coverage
will remain materially above 2.5x."

S&P could lower the rating if:

-- Lynxeo's debt to EBITDA exceeds 5.5x with no prospect of swift
recovery, due to weaker-than-anticipated operating performance
related to either protracted market weaknesses or cost overruns, or
in case of material debt-funded acquisitions or dividend
distributions;

-- FOCF turns negative with no prospect of rapid recovery; or

-- FFO cash interest coverage deteriorates sustainably below 2x.

S&P sees limited rating upside in the next two years considering
the smaller scale and scope of Lynxeo than higher-rated peers.
Nevertheless, S&P could raise the rating if:

-- Lynxeo substantially improves its revenue base and end-market
exposure while improving its margin and cash conversion profile,
reaching a level comfortably in the low-teens under any market
circumstances;

-- Debt to EBITDA improves and remains consistently at around 4x
under any market condition, supported by a commensurate financial
policy and disciplined track record of low leverage; and

-- Its FFO cash interest coverage remains sustainably above 3x.


NORIA 2025: Fitch Assigns 'B+(EXP)sf' Rating on Class F Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Noria 2025 expected ratings. The
assignment of final ratings is contingent on the receipt of final
documentations conforming to the information Fitch has received.

   Entity/Debt                Rating           
   -----------                ------           
Noria 2025

   Class A FR0014010T56   LT AAA(EXP)sf  Expected Rating
   Class B FR0014010T07   LT AA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
   Class C FR0014010T15   LT A(EXP)sf    Expected Rating
   Class D FR0014010SY5   LT BBB(EXP)sf  Expected Rating
   Class E FR0014010SZ2   LT BB(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
   Class F FR0014010T49   LT B+(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
   Class G FR0014010T23   LT NR(EXP)sf   Expected Rating

Transaction Summary

Noria 2025 is a 12-month revolving securitisation of French
unsecured consumer loans originated in France by BNP Paribas
Personal Finance (BNPP PF). The securitised portfolio will consist
of personal, debt consolidation and sales finance loans granted to
individuals. All loans will bear a fixed interest rate and amortise
in constant instalments.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Moderate Credit Risks: Fitch set a base-case default assumption of
4.7% and a recovery assumption of 45%, based on the performance of
BNPP PF's book and its macroeconomic expectations. Fitch applied a
'AAAsf' default multiple of 5.1x and a recovery haircut close to
50% to stress base-case assumptions at the notes' ratings. Its
assumptions and stresses are within the market average.

Revolving Period Risks Addressed: The transaction will have a
maximum 12-month revolving period. Early amortisation triggers are
fairly loose, but the short revolving period, alongside eligibility
criteria and available credit enhancement (CE), mitigates the risk
introduced by the revolving period. Fitch has also analysed
potential changes to portfolio composition during this period and
stressed the portfolio's average interest rate.

Hybrid Pro Rata Redemption: The notes are paid based on their
target subordination ratios (as percentages of the performing and
delinquent portfolio balance) during the amortisation period. The
subordination ratio for each class is equal to its initial CE,
which means all the notes will amortise pro rata if no sequential
amortisation event occurs and there is no principal deficiency
ledger in debit.

Servicing Continuity Risk Mitigated: BNPP PF will be the
transaction servicer. No back-up servicer will be appointed at
closing. However, servicing continuity risks are mitigated by,
among other things, a monthly transfer of borrowers' notification
details, the use of a specially dedicated account bank, and a
reserve fund to cover liquidity. In addition, the management
company is responsible for appointing a substitute servicer within
30 calendar days in the event of a servicer termination.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

Sensitivities to higher default rates and lower recoveries are
shown below:

Defaults increase by 25%

Class A; 'AAsf'; Class B: 'Asf'; Class C: 'BBB+sf'; Class D:
'BBB-sf'; Class E: 'BB-sf'; Class F: 'Bsf'

Recoveries decrease by 25%

Class A; 'AA+sf'; Class B: 'AA-sf'; Class C: 'A-sf'; Class D:
'BBB-sf'; Class E: 'BBsf'; Class F: 'Bsf'

Defaults increase by 25% and recoveries decrease by 25%

Class A; 'AA-sf'; Class B: 'Asf'; Class C: 'BBBsf'; Class D:
'BB+sf'; Class E: 'B+sf'; Class F: 'CCCsf'

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

Sensitivities to lower default rates and higher recoveries are
shown below:

Defaults decrease by 25%

Class A; 'AAAsf'; Class B: 'AA+sf'; Class C: 'AA-sf'; Class D:
'A-sf'; Class E: 'BBBsf'; Class F: 'BB+sf'

Recoveries increase by 25%

Class A; 'AAAsf'; Class B: 'AAsf'; Class C: 'Asf'; Class D:
'BBB+sf'; Class E: 'BBB-sf'; Class F: 'BBsf'

Defaults decrease by 25% and recoveries increase by 25%

Class A; 'AAAsf'; Class B: 'AA+sf'; Class C: 'AA-sf'; Class D:
'Asf'; Class E: 'BBB+sf'; Class F: 'BBB-sf'

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

Fitch reviewed the results of a third-party assessment conducted on
the asset portfolio information, and concluded that there were no
findings that affected the rating analysis.

Fitch conducted a review of a small targeted sample of the
originator's origination files and found the information contained
in the reviewed files to be adequately consistent with the
originator's policies and practices and the other information
provided to the agency about the asset portfolio.

Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above,
Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's
rating analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies
indicates that it is adequately reliable.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.




=============
G E O R G I A
=============

GEORGIA GLOBAL: Fitch Alters Outlook on 'BB-' IDR to Positive
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has revised Georgia Global Utilities JSC's (GGU)
Outlook to Positive from Stable and affirmed Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB-'.

The revision of the Outlook reflects positive pressure on GGU's
'b+' Standalone Credit Profile (SCP) at 'b+', due to moderate funds
from operations (FFO) net leverage for the 2025-2027 regulatory
period, comfortable liquidity and an FFO interest coverage of
around 3.0x following its bond refinancing in July 2024. Additional
visibility on a constructive upcoming regulatory period for water
activities starting in 2027 could lead to an upgrade of the IDR.

The 'BB-' IDR reflects a one-notch uplift from GGU's SCP, which
underlines shareholder FCC Aqualia S.A.'s (BBB-/Stable) perceived
strategic incentive to support its weaker subsidiary.

Key Rating Drivers

Strong SCP: Fitch anticipates GGU's FFO net leverage to average
slightly below its positive sensitivity of 3.5x in 2025-2027,
representing a moderate increase from 3.0x in 2024, and project
interest coverage to remain sound at 2.9x-3.2x. This reflects a
significant rationalisation of investments for 2025-2027, with
average annual capex reduced to GEL165 million from the previously
expected GEL210 million. Fitch forecasts pre-dividend free cash
flow (FCF) to be negative at GEL75 million over 2025-2027. However,
Fitch forecasts large dividend distributions from 2027 up to the
3.5x net debt documented covenant under its base case.

Robust Business Profile: GGU's business mix remains fairly
defensive, with regulated water supply and wastewater services
accounting for about 85% of group revenues, supported by tariff
visibility until end-2026, its natural monopolistic position in
Tbilisi, and direct ownership of the water and wastewater
infrastructure. The remaining business relates to the generation
and sale of electricity, with an installed capacity of 149MW. About
40% of GGU's electricity is generated for the group's own
consumption, while excess electricity is sold predominantly through
12-month bilateral agreements with industrial customers.

Regulated water distribution carries no volume or price risk and is
well protected against inflation and interest-rate risks, even
though regulatory adjustments are delayed to the next regulatory
period and the risk of political intervention in the subsector.
Hydroelectric generation, in both current and anticipated market
configurations, will continue to bear price and volume risks —
primarily related to the availability of water — though this is
mitigated by the operational adaptability of the Zhinvali
reservoir.

Unchanged Strategy: GGU's investment strategy continues to focus on
refurbishing its water network infrastructure (to reduce leaks),
modernising pumping stations (to achieve energy savings and
increase electricity sold to customers), and improving metering and
fraud detection. The liberalisation of electricity markets in
Georgia, including balancing and ancillary services markets, and
the related adoption of daily margin pricing are opportunities for
GGU to achieve higher electricity prices, further offsetting FX
risk. However, neither these developments nor a full regulatory
allowed tariff increase for households are included in its
assumptions for prudence.

Manageable FX Risk: GGU effectively mitigates FX risk on its
financial debt and interest charges resulting from the US dollar
appreciation against the Georgian lari by holding USD24 million of
its own notes and maintaining substantial short-term bank deposits
denominated in US dollars (USD64 million held at end-May). In
addition, the natural hedge provided by dollar-denominated
electricity revenues should cover 50%-60% of interest payments,
based on its estimates. Fitch does not expect moderate US dollar
appreciation to undermine GGU's financial profile, even though its
US dollar reserves will be progressively deployed over 2025-2027
for investments.

Ring-Fenced Bond Structure: GGU's USD300 million bond includes
restrictive covenants, and Fitch's rating approach treats GGU as a
non-recourse subsidiary for Aqualia, notwithstanding an expected
full minority buyout. Noteholders benefit from restricted payment
and debt incurrence tests. In particular, the restricted group may
make aggregate restricted payments of up to 50% of consolidated net
income, provided the issuer meets the debt incurrence test, among
other conditions. The restricted group may incur additional debt if
consolidated net leverage is less than 3.5x and may also make
unlimited restricted payments if consolidated net leverage does not
exceed 2.5x.

Strategic Links with Aqualia: The rating uplift reflects its view
that Aqualia has a 'Medium' strategic incentive to support GGU,
while Fitch assesses legal and operational incentives to support as
'Low'. Fitch considers the financial contribution from GGU to the
Aqualia group as reasonable, at about 14% of consolidated EBITDA
and up to 20% of the investment plan. GGU's business is also
aligned with Aqualia's core water and sewage management expertise.
In its view, GGU offers moderate growth potential for Aqualia,
given the subsidiary's need to modernise its water infrastructure,
narrow significant water losses, and lower its own electricity
consumption.

Peer Analysis

A close peer of GGU is ENERGO-Pro a.s. (EPas, BB-/Negative), a
utility headquartered in the Czech Republic with operating
companies in Bulgaria, Georgia, Spain and Turkiye. Its core
activities are power distribution, grid support services and
electricity generation. ENERGO-Pro's higher debt capacity than
GGU's reflects its larger size and its diversification by geography
and type of business.

Other peers for GGU in the CIS regions are the Uzbekistan-based
distribution and supply company, Regional Electrical Power Networks
JSC (IDR BB/Stable, SCP: ccc). The latter has a larger asset base
and greater geographical coverage than GGU, but this is more than
offset by GGU's more established regulated asset base framework,
driving the difference between their SCPs, alongside the Uzbek
company's weak liquidity. Its IDR is aligned with Uzbekistan's due
to the state's 'Very Strong' decision-making and oversight and
precedents of support and 'Strong' preservation of government
policy role.

Key Assumptions

- Regulatory allowed revenue of the water utility business
increasing by a conservative 10% in the 2027-2029 regulatory period
compared with the 2024-2026 regulatory period, without fully
factoring in regulatory provisions

- Energy production of 400GWh annually, of which around 240GWh sold
externally; electricity price to rise GEL17/KWh in 2027, from
GEL14/KWh in 2024, without factoring in the eventual benefit from
market liberalisation

- EBITDA margin on average at 68% during 2025-2027

- Capex averaging GEL165 million a year over 2025-2027

- No dividend distributions in 2024-2026. Dividends of GEL144
million assumed by Fitch in 2027 while adhering to the 3.5x net
debt /EBITDA bond covenant

- Georgian lari/US dollar annual average exchange rate of 2.9 in
2025 and 2.99 in 2026 and 2027

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

A downgrade is unlikely given the Positive Outlook, unless
Aqualia's incentives to support GGU are reassessed as 'Low', which
would lead Fitch to rate GGU on a standalone basis and result in a
downgrade of its IDR.

- The Outlook would be revised to Stable if Fitch lacks visibility
on a supportive regulatory framework for 2027-2029, or if there is
a sustained decline in profitability and cash flow (e.g.,
persistent water losses or weaker cash collection), leading to FFO
net leverage (excluding connection fees) above 3.5x. on a sustained
basis

Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- Mainteinance of FFO net leverage (excluding connection fees)
sustainably below 3.5x, accompanied by a coherent financial policy

- Improved visibility around supportive regulatory evolution and
material improvement in asset quality (i.e. significantly smaller
network losses or lower own electricity consumption)

- Stronger links with Aqualia

Liquidity and Debt Structure

At end-2024, GGU's cash and cash equivalent totalled GEL219
million, of which GEL169 million is held in short-term deposits at
Georgian banks. This would mostly cover negligible debt maturities
in 2025-2027 and cumulative negative FCF of GEL220 million expected
in the next three years.

Issuer Profile

GGU is a water utility and renewable energy business that supplies
potable water and provides wastewater collection and processing
services to about 1.3 million people in Georgia. More than half of
the electricity generated by GGU is sold to third parties, with the
rest used by its water supply and sanitation services business to
power its water distribution network.

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

ESG Considerations

GGU has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Water & Wastewater
Management due to heavily worn-out water infrastructure and large
water losses, which has a negative impact on the credit profile,
and is relevant to the ratings in conjunction with other factors.

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt              Rating         Recovery   Prior
   -----------              ------         --------   -----
Georgia Global
Utilities JSC         LT IDR BB-  Affirmed            BB-

   senior unsecured   LT     BB-  Affirmed   RR4      BB-




=============
G E R M A N Y
=============

HSE FINANCE: Moody's Appends LD to PDR on Restructuring Completion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has appended a limited default (LD) designation to
HSE Finance S.a r.l. (HSE or the company)'s probability of default
rating, revising it to Caa3-PD/LD from Caa3-PD. There is no change
to the company's Caa3 corporate family rating or the Caa3 ratings
on its backed senior secured debt instruments. The negative outlook
is unaffected.

RATINGS RATIONALE

On July 3, 2025, HSE announced the completion of the restructuring
of its capital structure. Of the total pre-restructuring debt of
EUR630 million, EUR340 million has been reinstated as operating
company debt and the maturity has been extended to October 2029. Of
the remaining EUR290 million, EUR192 million has been converted to
payment in kind (PIK) notes at the holding company level, while the
remaining EUR98 million has been converted to equity like
instruments. Moody's classify this transaction as a distressed
exchange, an event of default under Moody's definitions, which is
reflected in the LD designation.

Headquartered in Ismaning, Germany, HSE is a multichannel home
shopping operator that offers a wide range of own, exclusive and
third-party brand products on its TV platform, online, via
smartphone and tablet applications, and through smart TV. For the
last twelve months ending March 31, 2025, HSE generated revenue of
EUR619 million and Moody's adjusted EBITDA of EUR65 million. HSE
has been owned by the private-equity firm Providence Equity
Partners since 2012.




=============
I R E L A N D
=============

AVOCA CLO XIV: Fitch Assigns 'B-sf' Final Rating on Cl. F-R-R Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Avoca CLO XIV DAC final ratings.

   Entity/Debt                  Rating             Prior
   -----------                  ------             -----
Avoca CLO XIV DAC

   A Loan                   LT AAAsf  New Rating
   A-R-R XS3076935009       LT AAAsf  New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
   B-1-R-R XS3076935264     LT AAsf   New Rating   AA(EXP)sf
   B-2-R-R XS3076935421     LT AAsf   New Rating   AA(EXP)sf
   C-R-R XS3076935348       LT Asf    New Rating   A(EXP)sf
   D-R-R XS3076935694       LT BBB-sf New Rating   BBB-(EXP)sf
   E-R-R XS3076935850       LT BB-sf  New Rating   BB-(EXP)sf
   F-R-R XS3076935777       LT B-sf   New Rating   B-(EXP)sf
   Sub Notes XS1235911192   LT NRsf   New Rating   NR(EXP)sf
   X-R XS3076935181         LT AAAsf  New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf

Transaction Summary

Avoca CLO XIV DAC is a securitisation of mainly senior secured
obligations (at least 90%) with a component of senior unsecured,
mezzanine and second-lien loans and high-yield bonds. All except
the subordinated notes were refinanced, with the remaining proceeds
invested in additional assets until the target par amount is
reached.

The portfolio is actively managed by KKR Credit Advisors (Ireland)
Unlimited Company. The collateralised loan obligation (CLO) has a
4.5-year reinvestment period and an 8.5-year weighted average life
test (WAL) at closing.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Average Portfolio Credit Quality (Neutral): Fitch assesses the
average credit quality of obligors at 'B'/'B-'. The Fitch-weighted
average rating factor (WARF) of the identified portfolio is 25.1.

High Recovery Expectations (Positive): At least 90% of the
portfolio comprises senior secured obligations. The recovery
prospects for these assets are more favourable than for
second-lien, unsecured and mezzanine assets. The Fitch-weighted
average recovery rate of the identified portfolio is 60.9%.

Diversified Asset Portfolio (Positive): The transaction has a
concentration limit for the 10 largest obligors at 20%. The deal
also includes other concentration limits, including a maximum
exposure of 40% to the three largest Fitch-defined industries in
the portfolio. These covenants ensure the portfolio will not be
excessively concentrated.

Portfolio Management (Neutral): The transaction has two matrices
effective at closing and two that are effective 18 months after
closing, all with fixed-rate limits of 0% and 10%. All four
matrices are based on a Top 10 obligor concentration limit of 20%.
The closing matrices correspond to an 8.5-year WAL test, while the
forward matrices correspond to a seven-year WAL test.

The deal has a reinvestment period of about 4.5 years and includes
reinvestment criteria similar to those of other European
transactions. Fitch's analysis is based on a stressed-case
portfolio, with the aim of testing the robustness of the deal
structure against its covenants and portfolio guidelines.

Cash-flow Modelling (Positive): The WAL for the transaction's
Fitch-stressed portfolio analysis is 12 months less than the WAL
covenant. This is to account for the strict reinvestment conditions
envisaged after the reinvestment period. These include passing the
coverage tests and Fitch 'CCC' limit after the reinvestment period,
and a WAL covenant that progressively steps down, before and after
the end of the reinvestment period. These conditions would reduce
the effective risk horizon of the portfolio during periods of
stress.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

An increase of the default rate (RDR) by 25% of the mean RDR and a
decrease of the recovery rate (RRR) by 25% at all rating levels in
the current portfolio would have no impact on the class X-R to
A-R-R notes, lead to downgrades of up to two notches for the class
B-1-R-R to E-R-R notes and to below 'B-sf' for the class F-R-R
notes. Downgrades may occur if the build-up of the notes' credit
enhancement following amortisation does not compensate for a larger
loss expectation than initially assumed due to unexpectedly high
levels of defaults and portfolio deterioration.

Due to the better metrics and shorter life of the current portfolio
than the Fitch-stressed portfolio, the class B-R-R, D-R-R, E-R-R
and F-R-R notes have a rating cushion of two notches, and the class
C-R-R notes have a cushion of one notch.

Should the cushion between the current portfolio and the
Fitch-stressed portfolio be eroded, either due to manager trading
or negative portfolio credit migration, a 25% increase of the mean
RDR and a 25% decrease of the RRR across all ratings of the
Fitch-stressed portfolio would lead to downgrades of four notches
for the class B-1-R-R to D-R-R debt, three notches for the class
A-R-R notes and to below 'B-sf' for the class E-R-R and F-R-R
notes.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

A reduction of the RDR by 25% of the mean RDR and an increase in
the RRR by 25% at all rating levels in the Fitch-stressed portfolio
would result in upgrades of up to four notches for all notes,
except for the 'AAAsf' rated notes, which are at the highest level
on Fitch's scale and cannot be upgraded.

Upgrades during the reinvestment period, which are based on the
Fitch-stressed portfolio, may occur on better-than-expected
portfolio credit quality and a shorter remaining WAL test, allowing
the notes to withstand larger-than-expected losses for the
remaining life of the transaction. Upgrades after the end of the
reinvestment period may result from stable portfolio credit quality
and deleveraging, leading to higher credit enhancement and excess
spread available to cover losses in the remaining portfolio.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

The majority of the underlying assets or risk-presenting entities
have ratings or credit opinions from Fitch and other Nationally
Recognised Statistical Rating Organisations and European Securities
and Markets Authority-registered rating agencies. Fitch has relied
on the practices of the relevant groups within Fitch and other
rating agencies to assess the asset portfolio information or
information on the risk-presenting entities.

Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above, its
assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's rating
analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies indicates
that it is adequately reliable.

ESG Considerations

Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores for Avoca CLO XIV DAC.

In cases where Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores in
connection with the credit rating of a transaction, programme,
instrument or issuer, Fitch will disclose any ESG factor that is a
key rating driver in the key rating drivers section of the relevant
rating action commentary.


BOSPHORUS CLO V: Fitch Affirms 'Bsf' Rating on Class F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Bosphorus CLO V DAC's class B-1 and B-2
notes and affirmed the rest. Fitch has also revised the class C
notes' Outlook to Positive from Stable.

   Entity/Debt              Rating           Prior
   -----------              ------           -----
Bosphorus CLO V DAC

   A-1 XS2073812336     LT AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
   A-2 XS2082334249     LT AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
   B-1 XS2073813060     LT AAAsf  Upgrade    AA+sf
   B-2 XS2073813730     LT AAAsf  Upgrade    AA+sf
   C XS2073814381       LT A+sf   Affirmed   A+sf
   D XS2073814977       LT BBB+sf Affirmed   BBB+sf
   E XS2073816162       LT BB+sf  Affirmed   BB+sf
   F XS2073816329       LT Bsf    Affirmed   Bsf

Transaction Summary

Bosphorus CLO V DAC is a cash flow CLO comprising senior secured
obligations. The transaction is actively managed by Cross Ocean
Adviser LLP and exited its reinvestment period in June 2024.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Amortisation Benefits Senior Notes: The transaction has started to
deleverage and the class A-1 and A-2 notes have been paid down by
EUR86.7 million jointly since the last review in August 2024. The
amortisation has resulted in an increase in credit enhancement for
the notes and therefore the upgrade of the class B-1 and B-2 notes,
even though the portfolio is currently 1.8% below par (calculated
as the current par difference over the original target par).

Cushions Support Stable Outlooks: All notes have comfortable
default-rate buffers to support their ratings and should be capable
of absorbing further defaults in the portfolio. The notes have
sufficient credit protection to withstand deterioration in the
credit quality of the portfolio at their ratings.

Mild Deterioration; Limited Refinancing Risk: The portfolio has
deteriorated mildly since the last review. The transaction was
failing the weighted average life (WAL) test and Fitch weighted
average rating factor (WARF) test, according to the trustee report
as of June 2025. Exposure to assets with a Fitch-derived rating of
'CCC+' and below was 7.4%, versus a limit of 7.5%. The transaction
has limited near- and medium-term refinancing risk with no assets
maturing in 2025 and 4.3% of assets maturing in 2026.

Transaction Out of Reinvestment Period: The transaction exited its
reinvestment period in June 2024 and has not reinvested since
September 2024. Fitch based the upgrade analysis on the current
portfolio, which Fitch stressed by downgrading any obligor with a
Negative Outlook by one notch, with a floor of 'CCC-', and flooring
the portfolio's WAL at four years, assuming the transaction will
not reinvest. However, the WAL test was in compliance at the end of
the reinvestment period, according to the manager, and thus the
transaction may be eligible for reinvestment again.

'B'/'B-' Portfolio: Fitch assesses the average credit quality of
the transaction's underlying obligors at 'B'/'B-'. The WARF, as
calculated by Fitch under its latest criteria, is 25.3.

High Recovery Expectations: The portfolio comprises 100% senior
secured obligations. Fitch views the recovery prospects for these
assets as more favourable than for second-lien, unsecured and
mezzanine assets. The weighted average recovery rate, as calculated
by Fitch, is 62.2%.

Less Diversified Portfolio: The portfolio becomes more concentrated
as it deleverages. The top 10 obligor concentration is 26%, versus
a limit of 20%. The largest obligor represents 3% of the portfolio
balance and exposure to the three largest Fitch-defined industries
is 25.7%, under Fitch's calculations. Fixed-rate assets reported by
the trustee were at 2.4% of the portfolio balance, versus a limit
of 7.5%.

Cash Flow Analysis: Fitch used a customised proprietary cash flow
model to replicate the principal and interest waterfalls and the
various structural features of the transaction, and to assess their
effectiveness, including the structural protection provided by
excess spread diverted through the par-value and interest-coverage
tests.

Deviation from Model-Implied Rating: The class C notes are three
notches below their model-implied rating (MIR) due to the
uncertainty over whether the transaction will reinvest again. Fitch
will upgrade the class C notes if they continue to deleverage and
the portfolio does not become excessively concentrated.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

Downgrades, which are based on the current portfolio, may occur if
the loss expectation is larger than initially assumed, due to
unexpectedly high levels of default and portfolio deterioration.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

Upgrades may result from stable portfolio credit quality and
deleveraging, leading to higher credit enhancement and excess
spread available to cover losses in the remaining portfolio.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the
information it has received about the performance of the asset pool
and the transaction. Fitch has not reviewed the results of any
third-party assessment of the asset portfolio information or
conducted a review of origination files as part of its ongoing
monitoring.

The majority of the underlying assets or risk-presenting entities
have ratings or credit opinions from Fitch and/or other Nationally
Recognised Statistical Rating Organisations and/or European
Securities and Markets Authority- registered rating agencies. Fitch
has relied on the practices of the relevant groups within Fitch
and/or other rating agencies to assess the asset portfolio
information or information on the risk-presenting entities.

Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above,
Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's
rating analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies
indicates that it is adequately reliable.

ESG Considerations

Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores for Bosphorus CLO V
DAC.

In cases where Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores in
connection with the credit rating of a transaction, programme,
instrument or issuer, Fitch will disclose any ESG factor that is a
key rating driver in the key rating drivers section of the relevant
rating action commentary.


MAN GLG V: Fitch Affirms B-sf Rating on Class F Debt
----------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Man GLG Euro CLO V DAC's class B-1 to
B-3 notes and revised the class F notes' Outlook to Negative from
Stable.

   Entity/Debt               Rating           Prior
   -----------               ------           -----
Man GLG Euro CLO V DAC

   A-1-R XS2313671526    LT AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
   A-2-R XS2313672250    LT AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
   B-1 XS1881728221      LT AAAsf  Upgrade    AA+sf
   B-2-R XS2313672334    LT AAAsf  Upgrade    AA+sf
   B-3 XS1885673399      LT AAAsf  Upgrade    AA+sf
   C-1 XS1881728908      LT A+sf   Affirmed   A+sf
   C-2-R XS2313673142    LT A+sf   Affirmed   A+sf
   C-3 XS1885673985      LT A+sf   Affirmed   A+sf
   D-1 XS1881729203      LT BBB+sf Affirmed   BBB+sf
   D-2-R XS2313672680    LT BBB+sf Affirmed   BBB+sf
   E XS1881732256        LT BB+sf  Affirmed   BB+sf
   F XS1881732330        LT B-sf   Affirmed   B-sf

Transaction Summary

Man GLG Euro CLO V DAC is a cash flow CLO comprising mostly senior
secured obligations. The transaction is actively managed by GLG
Partners LP and exited its reinvestment period in December 2022.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Deleveraging Increases Senior Notes Buffer: The class A-1-R notes
have repaid EUR35.1 million, resulting in an increase in credit
enhancement (CE) of 3.3% for the class B-1 to B-3 notes, to 33.9%
currently from 30.6% in the January 2025 review. The transaction's
deleveraging has resulted in an increased default-rate cushion for
the senior notes, which can absorb further defaults in the
portfolio. This supports the upgrades of the class B-1 to B-3
notes.

Par Erosion Weakens Junior OC: The transaction is currently 4.4%
below par (calculated as the current par difference over the
original target par) and has EUR7.1 million of defaulted assets. It
has incurred par losses on sales since the last review, which has
reduced the default-rate cushion for the junior notes. The class F
par value test ratio has declined to 103.1% from 103.2%. The
transaction was breaching its Fitch weighted average recovery
rating, weighted average rating factor (WARF) tests and its
weighted average life (WAL) test, according to the last trustee
report of 4 June 2025.

Exposure to assets with a Fitch-derived rating of 'CCC+' and below
is 7.2%, according to the trustee report, up from 5.8% in January,
but below the limit of 7.5%. The Negative Outlook on the class F
notes reflects the par losses and the resulting thin cushion on
their par value test. These same factors also underline the
continuing Negative Outlook for the class E notes. Available CE is
still sufficient to maintain the current ratings on both class E
and F notes.

'B'/'B-' Portfolio: Fitch assesses the average credit quality of
the underlying obligors at 'B'/'B-'. The WARF of the current
portfolio is 27, as calculated by Fitch under its latest criteria.

High Recovery Expectations: Senior secured obligations comprise
98.7% of the portfolio. Fitch views the recovery prospects for
these assets as more favourable than for second-lien, unsecured and
mezzanine assets. The Fitch-calculated weighted average recovery
rate (WARR) of the current portfolio is 58.9%.

Diversified Portfolio: The portfolio is well-diversified across
obligors, countries and industries. The top 10 obligor
concentration, as calculated by Fitch, is 17.9%, and no obligor
represents more than 2% of the portfolio balance. Exposure to the
three-largest Fitch-defined industries is 35.4% as calculated by
the trustee. Fixed-rate assets, as reported by the trustee, are at
the 10% ceiling.

Transaction Outside Reinvestment Period: The transaction exited its
reinvestment period in December 2022. However, the manager can
continue to reinvest unscheduled principal proceeds and sale
proceeds from credit-risk obligations after the end of the
reinvestment period, subject to compliance with the reinvestment
criteria. The transaction is currently failing the WARF and Caa
tests of another rating agency which limit reinvestment, but the
manager may resume trading after asset sales or positive credit
migration.

Given the possibility of reinvestment, its upgrade analysis was
based on a stressed portfolio, by testing Fitch-calculated WARF,
Fitch-calculated WARR, weighted average spread (WAS) and fixed-rate
asset share to their covenanted limits, and assuming a four-year
floor for the WAL. Fitch also applied a 1.5% haircut to the WARR
covenanted limits specified in the Fitch collateral quality test
matrices, as the calculation of the WARR in the transaction
documentation is not in line with the agency's latest CLO Criteria
and could result in an inflated WARR compared with the current
criteria.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

Downgrades, which are based on the current portfolio, may occur if
loss expectations are larger than initially assumed, due to
unexpectedly high levels of default and portfolio deterioration.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

Upgrades may result from stable portfolio credit quality and
deleveraging, leading to higher CE and excess spread available to
cover losses in the remaining portfolio.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

DATA ADEQUACY

Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the
information it has received about the performance of the asset pool
and the transaction. Fitch has not reviewed the results of any
third-party assessment of the asset portfolio information or
conducted a review of origination files as part of its ongoing
monitoring.

The majority of the underlying assets or risk presenting entities
have ratings or credit opinions from Fitch and/or other Nationally
Recognised Statistical Rating Organisations and/or European
Securities and Markets Authority- registered rating agencies. Fitch
has relied on the practices of the relevant groups within Fitch
and/or other rating agencies to assess the asset portfolio
information or information on the risk-presenting entities.

Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above,
Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's
rating analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies
indicates that it is adequately reliable.

ESG Considerations

Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores for Man GLG Euro CLO V
DAC.

In cases where Fitch does not provide ESG relevance scores in
connection with the credit rating of a transaction, programme,
instrument or issuer, Fitch will disclose any ESG factor that is a
key rating driver in the key rating drivers section of the relevant
rating action commentary.




=========
I T A L Y
=========

LA DORIA: Fitch Assigns Rates New EUR675MM Secured Notes 'BB-'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned La Doria S.p.A.'s new five-year EUR675
million senior secured notes a final instrument rating of 'BB-'
with a Recovery Rating of 'RR3'. The final rating is in line with
the expected rating assigned on 30 June 2025, as the pricing of the
instruments and the final documentation largely conform with the
information already received.

La Doria's 'B+' Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) reflects its
niche scale and concentrated retail customer base, which is
mitigated by its longstanding customer relationships and adequate
operating profitability for a private-label food-processing
company.

The Stable Outlook reflects its expectations of sustained EBITDA
growth, driven mostly by product premiumisation and
margin-accretive acquisitions, alongside credit metrics that align
with a higher rating from end-2025. It also reflects its
expectations of consistently positive free cash flow (FCF)
generation, limited execution risk and adherence to a consistent
financial policy that is conducive to maintaining EBITDA gross
leverage below 5.0x.

Key Rating Drivers

Rating-Neutral Refinancing: Fitch views the increased issue of
EUR675 million floating-rate senior secured notes as credit neutral
to La Doria. This is because most of its proceeds are being used to
repay the company's existing EUR650 million 2029 senior secured
notes. The refinancing includes an amend-and-extend of its super
senior revolving credit facility (RCF) to EUR122.5 million.

Stabilising Operating Margins: La Doria's ability to improve
profitability is critical to its rating. Fitch anticipates EBITDA
margins will remain slightly below 12% in 2025-2026, in line with
its performance in 2023-2024. This should be followed by a rise
above 12% to 2028, driven by changes to the product mix, alongside
premiumisation, efficiency initiatives and renegotiated contract
terms reducing the lag between input and output prices, limiting
EBITDA margin volatility.

Moderate Leverage: Fitch expects La Doria's leverage to stay below
5.0x and EBITDA interest cover well above 3.0x, after refinancing.
The metrics will be supported by stable profitability and margin
accretion following the integration of the recently acquired
Pastificio Lensi and Fege. Fitch expects these additions to add
20bp-25bp to La Doria's profitability in 2025 and 2026.

Positive FCF: Fitch forecasts that La Doria will generate
sustainably positive FCF margins of 2.5%-4%, except in 2025, when
it will be 0.8% as capex will be higher at 3% of sales. The group's
credit profile benefits from its ability to generate FCF due to its
strong profitability for the rating category, contained
working-capital outflows and modest capex intensity. The newly
issued notes will reduce debt service costs, reinforcing the
positive FCF profile.

Shareholder Distributions Possible: The group's approach to
acquisitions is opportunistic, and Fitch expects any new
acquisitions to be modest, limiting integration and execution
risks. Fitch expects the group to use its rising cash balances for
shareholder distributions, subject to compliance with financial
documentation.

Slow Cost Pass-Through: La Doria benefits from its costs mainly
being variable. Its supplier base is fairly diversified, with the
top five suppliers accounting for around 18% of cost of goods sold.
Tomato sourcing is strong due to framework agreements with several
producers, but pulses suppliers are more concentrated. However, the
company is exposed to fluctuations in the price and yield of
tomatoes and other commodities, with slow cost pass-through of up
to a year. This may affect profitability in low-yielding seasons or
at times of geopolitical tension. Fitch expects the gap between
input and output prices to reduce as sales contracts are
renegotiated, enhancing margin stability.

Currency Exchange Risk: La Doria's operations are exposed to FX
risks. Its financial liabilities are denominated in euros, as are
most of its expenses, while sourcing costs are in euros and US
dollars, and about two-thirds of its turnover is in foreign
currencies, mainly sterling. This increases its risk of FX-related
profitability volatility. The group has a hedging policy based on
forward-rate agreements. However, this results in certain FX-driven
earnings and cash flow volatility.

Niche Product, Concentrated Customers: La Doria's ratings are
constrained to the 'B' rating category by its niche position in
food processing and modest business scale. It has a highly
concentrated customer base, with its top 10 clients representing
about 46% of revenue. However, this is mitigated by La Doria's
longstanding customer relationships and no contract cancellations,
backed by its logistic and production capabilities. The group's
margins of above 10% are high for the rating, underscoring its
attractive product offering, even though its customers have
stronger bargaining power.

Peer Analysis

La Doria compares well with a number of consumer, food and beverage
leveraged buyouts in Fitch's public and private ratings coverage.
Sigma Holdco BV (B/Stable) has a materially larger scale, greater
geographic diversification and higher margins, due to its branded
portfolio and a different cost base. Fitch allows Sigma a higher
debt capacity, even though it is mainly focused on a single
offering that is experiencing secular difficulties.

Nomad Foods Limited (BB/Stable), which is strong in branded and
private-label frozen food, is larger and has stronger
profitability. Nomad's leverage is also lower, justifying its
larger debt capacity and higher rating.

Flamingo Group International Limited (B-/Positive) operates in a
highly fragmented, agriculture-like floriculture market with a
concentrated customer base and limited expected FCF generation. It
is smaller than La Doria, with limited diversification across
geographical locations and its product portfolio. It also faces
seasonality and is vulnerable to weather conditions.

Sammontana Italia S.p.A. (B+/Stable), which is rated at the same
level as La Doria, has comparable credit metrics and similar scale,
but a slightly stronger business profile due to its wider product
offering, stronger brand awareness and lower customer
concentration. Its profits are also less exposed to the volatility
of input prices than La Doria's. These aspects are partly offset by
La Doria's lower execution risks as Sammontana is pursuing market
consolidation and expansion, including in overseas markets.

Key Assumptions

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

- Revenue growth of 8.6% in 2025 and 10.2% in 2026, due mainly to
acquisitions, followed by normalisation to 5.5% until 2028

- EBITDA margin at 11.7%-12.2% over 2025-2028

- Capex at EUR40 million in 2025, before normalising to about EUR30
million a year to 2028

- FCF margins at 0.8% in 2025 before normalising towards 4% to
2028

- M&A of EUR111 million in 2025 and slightly above EUR33 million a
year to 2028, funded by the FCF and readily available cash

- No dividends

Recovery Analysis

Its recovery analysis assumed that La Doria will be considered a
going concern in bankruptcy, and that it would be reorganised
rather than liquidated. This is because most of its value lies
within its client-and-supplier relationships and production and
logistic capabilities. Fitch assumed a 10% administrative claim.

Fitch assessed going concern EBITDA at EUR115 million, after
corrective measures and a restructuring of La Doria's capital
structure that allow it to retain a viable business model. Loss of
customer contracts, materials-sourcing challenges and difficulties
in passing on its input costs may drive financial distress, leading
to a restructuring that may result in its capital structure
becoming untenable.

Fitch applied a recovery multiple of 5.0x, which is the mid-range
for packaged food companies in EMEA.

Fitch assumed the increased RCF of EUR122.5 million (previously
EUR112.5 million) is fully drawn on default. The RCF ranks super
senior, ahead of the senior secured notes. Fitch expects La Doria's
existing receivables factoring facilities of about EUR152 million
to remain available during and after distress without requiring
alternative funding, although it may be available at a reduced
amount. This assumption is driven by the strong credit quality of
the group's client base.

Its waterfall analysis generated a ranked recovery for the senior
secured noteholders in the 'RR3' category, leading to a 'BB-'
instrument rating, one notch above the IDR.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- Increase in EBITDA gross leverage to above 5x, due to lower
profitability or debt-funded acquisitions

- EBITDA margin below 12%, resulting in lower FCF margins at below
2%

- EBITDA interest coverage weakening towards 3.0x or below

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

Fitch does not envisage an upgrade to the 'BB' rating category
unless the group achieves:

- Wider scale and broadens diversification across geographies, and
product premiumisation supports EBITDA growth to EUR300 million

- Higher EBITDA margin supporting FCF margin at above 3%

- EBITDA gross leverage consistently below 4x, driven by organic
expansion, integration of bolt-on targets or gross debt prepayment,
and EBITDA interest coverage above 4x for an extended period

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Fitch forecasts La Doria's available cash balance at around EUR40
million at end-2025. Stable operating performance with minimal
working-capital outflows and limited capex should support positive
FCF before acquisitions of EUR111 million in 2025 and EUR33 million
a year (Fitch assumptions) in 2026-2028.

La Doria will also have access to the fully undrawn increased RCF
of EUR122.5 million. It has no major debt maturing before 2030,
when the new senior secured notes of EUR675 million come due.

Issuer Profile

La Doria is an Italian manufacturer of private-label tomato,
vegetable and fruit derivatives, including sauces, soups,
dressings, purees and juices.

Date of Relevant Committee

24 June 2025

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt             Rating         Recovery   Prior
   -----------             ------         --------   -----
La Doria S.p.A.

   senior secured      LT BB-  New Rating   RR3      BB-(EXP)


LA DORIA: Fitch Hikes LongTerm IDR to 'B+', Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded La Doria S.p.A.'s Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) to 'B+', from 'B', and its senior secured debt
to 'BB-', from 'B+'. The Outlook is Stable. Fitch has assigned La
Doria's planned EUR675 million senior secured debt issue an
expected rating of 'BB-(EXP)'. The Recovery Rating on its senior
secured debt ratings is 'RR3'. Proceeds from the new notes will
redeem existing EUR650 million notes due 2029. The final debt
rating is subject to completion and final documentation conforming
to draft terms.

The upgrade reflects Fitch's expectations of sustained EBITDA
growth, driven mostly by product premiumisation and
margin-accretive acquisitions, alongside credit metrics that align
with a higher rating from end-2025. It also reflects its
expectations of consistently positive free cash flow (FCF)
generation, limited execution risk and adherence to a consistent
financial policy conducive to maintaining EBITDA gross leverage
below 5.0x.

Key Rating Drivers

Rating-Neutral Refinancing: La Doria plans to refinance its EUR650
million 2029 senior secured notes with the new senior secured
EUR675 million notes with maturity 2030. The refinancing includes
an amend and extend of its super senior revolving credit facility
(RCF) to EUR122.5 million. The transaction is ratings neutral and
will lead to lower debt service costs, supporting the group's FCF.

Steadying Operating Margins: La Doria's ability to improve
profitability is critical. Fitch anticipates EBITDA margins will
remain marginally below 12% in 2025-2026, in line with its
performance in 2023-2024. This should be followed by a rise above
12% to 2028, driven by changes to the product mix alongside
premiumisation, efficiency initiatives and renegotiated contract
terms reducing the lag between input and output prices, limiting
EBITDA margin volatility.

Credit Metrics Support Upgrade: The upgrade reflects its
expectations that La Doria's credit metrics will align with a
higher rating from end-2025, with leverage below 5.0x and EBITDA
interest cover far above 3.0x. The metrics will be supported by
stable profitability and margin accretion following the integration
of recently acquired Pastificio Lensi and Fege. Fitch expects these
additions to add 20bp-25bp to La Doria's profitability in 2025 and
2026.

Positive FCF: Fitch forecasts that La Doria will generate
sustainably positive FCF margins of 2%-3.5%, except in 2025, when
it will be 0.8% as capex will be higher at 3% of sales. The group's
credit profile benefits from its ability to generate FCF due to its
strong profitability for the rating category, contained working
capital outflows and modest capex intensity. The proposed notes
will reduce debt service costs, reinforcing the positive FCF
profile.

Shareholder Distributions Possible: The group's approach to
acquisitions is opportunistic, and Fitch expects any new buys to be
modest, limiting integration and execution risks. Fitch expects the
group to use its rising cash balances for shareholder
distributions, subject to compliance with financial documentation.

Slow Cost Pass-Through: La Doria benefits from its costs mainly
being variable. Its supplier base is fairly diversified, with the
top five suppliers accounting for around 18% of cost of goods sold.
Its tomato sourcing is strong due to framework agreements with
several producers, while pulses suppliers are more concentrated.
However, it is exposed to fluctuations in the price and yield of
tomatoes and other commodities, with slow cost pass-through of up
to a year. This may affect its profitability in low yielding
seasons or at times of geopolitical tension. Fitch expect the gap
between input and output prices to reduce as sales contracts are
renegotiated, enhancing margin stability.

Currency Exchange Risk: La Doria's operations are exposed to FX
risks. Its financial liabilities are denominated in euros, as are
most of its expenses, while sourcing costs are in euros and US
dollars, and about two thirds of its turnover is in foreign
currencies, mainly sterling. This increases its risk of FX-related
profitability volatility. The group has a hedging policy in place
based on forward-rate agreements. However, this results in certain
FX-driven earnings and cash flow volatility.

Niche Product, Concentrated Customers: La Doria's ratings are
constrained to the 'B' rating category by its niche position in
food processing and modest business scale. It has a highly
concentrated customer base, with its top 10 clients representing
about 46%of revenue. However, this is partly mitigated by La
Doria's longstanding customer relationships and no contract
cancellations, backed by its logistic and production capabilities.
The group's margins of above 10% are high for the rating,
underscoring its attractive product offering, even though its
customers have stronger bargaining power.

Peer Analysis

La Doria compares well with a number of consumer, food and beverage
leveraged buyouts in Fitch's public and private ratings coverage.
Sigma Holdco BV (B/Stable) has a materially larger scale, greater
geographic diversification and higher margins, due to its branded
portfolio and a different cost base. Fitch allows Sigma a higher
debt capacity, even though it is mainly focused on a single
offering that is experiencing secular difficulties.

Nomad Foods Limited (BB/Stable), which is strong in branded and
private-label frozen food, has a stronger business profile in scale
and profitability. Nomad's leverage is also lower, justifying its
larger debt capacity and higher rating.

Flamingo Group International Limited (B-/Positive) operates in a
highly fragmented, agriculture-like floriculture market with a
concentrated customer base and limited expected FCF generation. It
is smaller than La Doria, with limited diversification across
geographical locations and its product portfolio. It also faces
seasonality and is vulnerable to weather conditions.

Sammontana Italia S.p.A. (B+/Stable), which is rated at the same
level as La Doria, has comparable credit metrics and similar scale,
but a slightly stronger business profile due to its wider product
offering, stronger brand awareness and lower customer
concentration. Its profits are also less exposed to volatility of
input prices than La Doria. These aspects are partly compensated
for by La Doria's lower execution risks as Sammontana is pursuing a
market consolidation and expansion strategy, including in overseas
markets.

Key Assumptions

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

- Revenue growth of 8.6% in 2025 and 10.2% in 2026, due mainly to
acquisitions, followed by a normalisation to 5.5% until 2028

- EBITDA margin at 11.7%-12.2% over 2025-2028

- Capex at EUR40 million in 2025, before normalising to around
EUR30 million a year to 2028

- FCF margins at 0.8% in 2025 before normalising towards 3.5% to
2028

- M&A of EUR111 million in 2025 and slightly above EUR33 million a
year to 2028, funded by the FCF and readily available cash

- No dividends

Recovery Analysis

Its recovery analysis assumes that La Doria will be considered a
going concern in bankruptcy, and that it would be reorganised
rather than liquidated. This is because most of its value lies
within its client-and-supplier relationships and production and
logistic capabilities. Fitch assumed a 10% administrative claim.

Fitch assessed going concern EBITDA at EUR115 million, after
corrective measures and a restructuring of La Doria's capital
structure that allow it to retain a viable business model. Loss of
customer contracts, materials-sourcing challenges and difficulties
in passing on its input costs may drive financial distress, leading
to a restructuring that may result in its capital structure
becoming untenable.

Fitch applied a recovery multiple of 5.0x, which is the mid-range
for packaged food companies in EMEA. This generates a ranked
recovery in the 'RR3' band, leading to a 'BB-' rating for the
EUR650 million of senior secured notes.

For the existing capital structure its estimates of creditor claims
include a fully drawn EUR112.5 million super senior revolving
credit facility, and about EUR15 million of bilateral facilities,
both of which rank ahead of its super senior notes. Fitch expects
La Doria's existing receivables factoring facilities of
EUR152million to remain during and after distress without requiring
alternative funding, although available at a reduced amount. This
assumption is driven by the strong credit quality of the group's
client base.

Fitch estimates that recoveries for the proposed senior secured
notes of EUR675 million, considering an increased super senior RCF
to EUR122.5 million, would remain in 'RR3'. On refinancing
completion, Fitch expects to assign a final 'BB-'/'RR3' rating to
the new senior secured notes, maintaining a one notch uplift from
the IDR.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- Increase in EBITDA gross leverage to above 5x, due to lower
profitability or debt-funded acquisitions

- EBITDA margin below 12%, resulting in lower FCF margins below 2%

- EBITDA interest coverage weakening towards 3.0x or below

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

Fitch does not envisage an upgrade to the 'BB' rating category
unless the following occurs:

- Achievement of wider scale and broaden diversification across
geographies, and product premiumisation supports EBITDA growth to
EUR300 million

- Higher EBITDA margin supporting FCF margin at above 3%

- EBITDA gross leverage consistently below 4x, driven by organic
expansion, integration of bolt-on targets or gross debt prepayment
and EBITDA interest coverage above 4x for an extended period

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Fitch forecasts La Doria's available cash balance at around EUR40
million at end-2025. Stable operating performance with minimal
working capital outflows and limited capex should support positive
FCF before acquisitions of EUR111 million in 2025 and EUR33 million
a year (Fitch assumptions) in 2026-2028.

La Doria will also have access to the fully undrawn increased RCF
of EUR122.5 million. On completion of the refinancing, it will have
no major debt maturing before 2030, when the new senior secured
notes of EUR675 million come due.

Issuer Profile

La Doria is an Italian manufacturer of private-label tomato,
vegetable and fruit derivatives, including sauces, soups,
dressings, purees and juices.

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt            Rating                  Recovery   Prior
   -----------            ------                  --------   -----
La Doria S.p.A.     LT IDR B+       Upgrade                  B

   senior secured   LT     BB-(EXP) Expected Rating  RR3

   senior secured   LT     BB-      Upgrade          RR3     B+


OMNIA TECHNOLOGIES: Fitch Affirms 'B' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Omnia Technologies S.p.A.'s Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B' with a Stable Outlook and its
senior secured rating at 'B' with a Recovery Rating (RR) of 'RR4'
following the announcement of a EUR100 million fungible add-on to
its existing EUR500 million senior secured notes due 2031.

The affirmation reflects Fitch's view that the fungible add-on is
neutral to the rating, as EBITDA leverage will remain below the
negative sensitivity of 7.0x, despite an increase as a result. The
group will use the proceeds to repay EUR45 million currently
outstanding under its revolving credit facility and other debt of
EUR34 million, with the rest added to the balance sheet for
acquisitions.

The Stable Outlook indicates Fitch's expectation that Omnia
Technologies will successfully integrate its recent acquisitions
and achieve revenue growth and cost synergies leading to improved
EBITDA, which will support deleveraging over the medium-term from
the current high level.

Key Rating Drivers

Add-On to Increase Leverage: Fitch now expects EBITDA leverage to
be 6.3x at end-2025, compared with the previous forecast of 5.5x.
This remains well within the negative sensitivity of 7.0x. This
change is driven by an increase in total debt, which Fitch now
expects to be about EUR60 million higher at end-2025 versus its
previous forecast. Fitch continues to forecast steady deleveraging
from 2026, supported by revenue growth and margin improvement, with
EBITDA leverage reaching 5.4x at end-2028.

Growth via Acquisitions: Omnia Technologies has increased its scale
and diversification through 25 acquisitions, most of which were
bolt-on, over the past four years, particularly in 2023 and 2024.
This increased the group's revenue to about EUR740 million on an
annual run-rate basis. Reported revenue in 2024 was about EUR503
million, as this figure does not include a full year of trading for
many of the acquisitions.

Management is focusing on improving the group's profitability and
completing the integration of recent acquisitions. Fitch expects
the group to continue expanding through bolt-on acquisitions over
the medium term, financed from cash flow. Further increase of debt
and leverage may drive negative rating action.

Solid Profitability Expected: Historical statutory financials are
not representative, as the group has undergone many acquisitions.
Its rating case incorporates expected EBITDA margins of 13.6%-14.5%
through 2025-2028. Fitch expects the group will benefit from
management's optimisation initiatives, the completion of the
integration process and other synergy effects. Steady profitability
improvement is also supported by a rising share of aftermarket
revenue, which contributes about 26% of total group sales.

Volatile FCF: Fitch forecasts a slightly negative free cash flow
(FCF) margin for 2025, partly eroded by working capital outflows.
However, this should turn positive, in the low single digits,
during 2026-2028, given the absence of dividend payments,
sustainable capex levels and an expected improvement in EBITDA,
which will support the group's deleveraging capacity.

Good Diversification: Omnia Technologies' business profile reflects
good geographical and customer diversification. About 21% (pro
forma for acquisitions) revenue in 1Q25 was exposed to Italy, 33%
to the rest of Europe, 15% to North America, 12% to Asia and 19% to
other regions. The group also benefits from a wide range of
customers, with the top-10 representing only 10% of revenue. Fitch
assumes a manageable impact from US tariffs.

Leading in Niche Market: The group produces machinery primarily for
the beverage sector, particularly in the wine, soft drinks, water
and spirits end-markets. In this niche market, Omnia Technologies
holds a leading position and sells its products globally. It has a
well-established footprint and long-term relationships with
customers. Its product portfolio covers the full value chain across
end-markets, which provides a sustainable order backlog and
moderate revenue visibility.

Less Cyclical End-Markets: The group's underlying market is
represented by the diversity of the beverage industry, which is
known for its stable demand and non-cyclical nature. Demand in the
beverage industry is supported by population growth, urbanisation
and rising disposable income. This supports visibility and
sustainability of Omnia Technologies' revenue and EBITDA
generation.

Integration Risk: Fitch expects heightened integration risk for
ACMI, a producer of high-speed end-of-line equipment, and the SACMI
beverage division, a producer of high-speed blowing and filling
equipment, as these acquisitions are of much larger scale than
previous ones. Execution risk is mitigated by a well-defined M&A
execution and integration strategy implemented since 2021, with 15
companies fully integrated and EUR21 million EBITDA synergies
achieved by 1Q25. Nevertheless, EBITDA growth targets will not be
met if further synergies are not realised, potentially putting
pressure on the rating.

Peer Analysis

Omnia Technologies' business profile, like those of Flender
International GmbH (B/Stable), EVOCA S.p.A. (B/Stable) and Ammega
Group B.V. (B-/Stable), is constrained by a less diversified
product range and end-markets exposure than at larger industrial
peers. Nevertheless, the group has good geographical
diversification, similar to Ahlstrom Holding 3 Oy (B+/Negative),
Ammega, Flender and INNIO Group Holding GmbH (B+/Positive).

Omnia Technologies' solid double-digit EBITDA margins are similar
to those of some Fitch-rated diversified industrial peers, such TK
Elevator Holdco GmbH (B/Stable), and Ahlstrom. Fitch forecasts a
material improvement in FCF margins to the low single digits from
2025, which will be comparable to those Fitch expects for Ahlstrom,
but lower than for Evoca and Ammega.

Fitch forecasts Omnia Technologies' leverage will reach 6.3x by
end-2025, which would be commensurate with that of Ahlstrom and
Flender, but lower than at TK Elevator and Ammega.

Key Assumptions

- Revenue growth of around 40% in 2025, due to recent large
acquisitions and in the low single digits in 2026-2028

- Optimisation programme and synergies from acquisitions to drive
EBITDA margin to 13.6% in 2025 and 14.5% by 2028

- Capex at EUR25 million a year in 2025-2028

- M&A of EUR40 million in 2025, reducing to EUR20 million a year in
2026-2028

- No dividend payments to 2028

Recovery Analysis

- The recovery analysis assumes that Omnia Technologies would be
reorganised as a going concern in bankruptcy rather than
liquidated.

- Fitch assumes a 10% administrative claim.

- Fitch estimates going concern EBITDA at EUR70 million, reflecting
its view of a sustainable, post-reorganisation EBITDA on which
Fitch bases the valuation of the group (Fitch has not incorporated
ongoing debt-funded bolt-on acquisitions).

- Fitch applies an enterprise value multiple of 5.0x to going
concern EBITDA to calculate a post-reorganisation valuation. This
reflects Omnia Technologies' good market position in the production
of equipment for the beverage industry and healthy geographical and
customer diversification. The multiple also reflects the group's
constrained scale compared to that of peers.

- Fitch estimates senior debt claims - after the add-on - at EUR715
million, comprising a EUR115 million super senior secured revolving
credit facility and EUR600 million senior secured notes.

Its waterfall analysis generated a ranked recovery for Omnia
Technologies' notes equivalent to a Recovery Rating of 'RR4',
leading to a 'B' rating.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- EBITDA leverage above 7.0x

- EBITDA interest coverage below 2.0x

- Consistently negative FCF margin

- Aggressive shareholder-friendly policies or acquisitions leading
to a further increase in leverage

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- EBITDA leverage below 5.0x

- FCF margin consistently above 2%

- Successful implementation of strategic optimisation initiatives
and integration following acquisitions, leading to EBITDA margin
growth

Liquidity and Debt Structure

As of 31 March 2025, Omnia Technologies reported EUR61 million cash
on its balance sheet, before Fitch's adjustment of EUR12 million
for not readily available cash. Concurrent to the add-on, the group
is also increasing its revolving credit facility by EUR25 million
to EUR115 million. Liquidity is adequate to fund the forecast
negative FCF for 2025 and further identified M&A for 2025. Expected
positive FCF generation from 2026 provides additional liquidity
cushion in the medium term.

The group's debt, after the transaction, will be represented by
EUR600 million senior secured floating-rate notes. The maturity of
the notes is seven years, leaving no material scheduled debt
repayments until November 2031.

Issuer Profile

Omnia Technologies is an Italy-based company providing automated
machinery and end-to-end solutions, mainly for the wine and
beverage industry, but also the pharmaceutical industry. The
product portfolio focuses on processing, bottling, packaging
systems, vial filling, capping and water treatment.

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt                    Rating        Recovery   Prior
   -----------                    ------        --------   -----
Omnia Technologies S.p.A.   LT IDR B  Affirmed             B

   senior secured           LT     B  Affirmed    RR4      B




===========
P O L A N D
===========

DL INVEST: Fitch Assigns 'BB-' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Positive
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Polish real-estate company, DL Invest
Group PM S.A. (DLIG), a first-time Long-Term Issuer Default Rating
(IDR) of 'BB-'. The Outlook is Positive. Fitch has also assigned
DLIG's planned EUR350 million benchmark unsecured bond a senior
unsecured expected rating of 'BB-(EXP)' with a Recovery Rating of
'RR4'. The assignment of a final rating is contingent on final
documentation conforming to information already received.

The ratings are supported by DLIG's quality logistic assets in
Poland, with some offices and retail parks. However, the
portfolio's size, with a value of PLN3.4 billion at end-2024,
results in asset and tenant concentration.

The Positive Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation that the group's
net debt/EBITDA leverage will decrease to about 11x in 2027, from a
high 17x in 2025. Fitch expects rental-derived EBITDA interest
cover of 1.5x-1.9x during 2026-2028. DLIG's portfolio uses mostly
secured funding. Part of the proceeds from the planned unsecured
bond will be used to repay some secured debt, creating a meaningful
unencumbered asset pool.

Key Rating Drivers

Core Logistic Portfolio: DLIG's industrial assets total 0.75
million square metres (sqm) of gross leasable area (GLA) and were
valued at PLN2.3 billion at end-2024. DLIG's flagship is a logistic
park in Psary, about 20km from Katowice, with a total GLA of
241,000 sqm and a market value of PLN881 million. The key tenant is
Inditex, which has leased 169,000 sqm for seven years. Other
tenants include DHL (Deutsche Post AG; A-/Stable) and Stokrotka, a
supermarket chain.

The second-largest asset, acquired in 2024, is a former Stellantis
N.V. (BBB/Stable) car-engine factory in Bielsko-Biała with a GLA
of 267,000 sqm and value of PLN336 million. The prime industrial
location is balanced against the secondary quality of the
buildings. DLIG has lined up tenants to fully occupy this asset.

Office and Retail Diversification: DLIG also owns a portfolio of
small-to-mid size office assets (GLA 12,000 sqm on average), with a
significant retail and services component. The largest asset (GLA
27,000 sqm), a Craft office building in Katowice, is being
partially redeveloped into a hotel. Other offices, some secondary,
have high occupancy, despite wider market vacancy in Katowice
(about 20%) and some other markets. DLIG also owns 13 retail parks,
which are valued at PLN318 million.

Asset and Tenant Concentration: The group's portfolio is
concentrated within its top-10 assets, including Psary, Dębica
(market value of PLN193 million) and Teresin (PLN296 million)
logistic parks, comprising over 70% of total end-2024 portfolio
value. The tenant concentration is also high, as the top-10 tenants
represent 51% of rental income, including the top tenant, Inditex
(20%). Other tenants include Stokrotka (8%), parcel delivery
company InPost S.A. (BB+/Stable, 6%), car parts supplier Hutchinson
(5%) and DHL (4%).

Silesia-Focused Portfolio: Most of DLIG's assets are in the Silesia
Voivodeship, where many socioeconomic indicators exceed Poland's
average. Its capital city, Katowice, with its metropolitan area,
has a population of around 2.5 million. The region is also the
second-biggest industrial sub-market in Poland, with existing stock
of almost 6 million sqm, or about 17% of total stock.

Continued Portfolio Growth: DLIG spent PLN1.4 billion on capex and
acquisitions during 2022-2024. In 2025, it plans to accelerate
portfolio growth through property developments and acquisitions
over the next two years, with a PLN1.8 billion, largely
uncommitted, pipeline. DLIG has a minimum 70% pre-let target before
a unit's construction starts.

Stable Operational Performance: The group's portfolio occupancy
remained over 95% during 2021-2024. The weighted-average lease
length to earliest break (WALB) of 5.5 years is a mix of longer
logistic leases (WALB: 6.7 years) and shorter office and retail
leases (below four years). Like-for-like rental growth in 2024 was
mostly due to 7.7% inflation-linked indexation under tenancy
agreements.

Emira Investment in DL Invest Group: In 4Q24-1Q25, Emira, a South
African REIT, invested EUR100 million in DLIG's Luxembourg parent
entity (LuxCo). This investment is structured as preferred shares
and loan notes linked together. The linked instrument is undated,
but after five years (plus one year under LuxCo's extension
option), Emira may exercise a redemption option at EUR175 million.
The instrument requires an annual cash return (7.2% minimum
interest coupon) routed as a dividend from DLIG.

Analytical Approach to Emira Investment: Most funds invested by
Emira have been injected into DLIG as equity to fund logistic
portfolio growth. Fitch treats this as DLIG's subordinated debt, as
DLIG-generated cash flow is needed to service Emira's linked
instrument payments, adding EUR175 million to its total debt
amount. Fitch includes the cash-pay requirement to calculate DLIG's
cash interest payments. Emira has contractual mechanisms for its
capital to be repaid, which include instructing asset disposals
from LuxCo's property companies, causing change of control-linked
debt repayment requirements at the DLIG level. Consequently, Fitch
treats this capital as debt under its criteria.

Decreasing Leverage: Fitch forecasts DLIG's net debt/EBITDA at a
high 17x in 2025. Fitch expects this to fall to 14.4x in 2026,
reflecting rents coming on-stream from developments that DLIG
pre-lets. Phasing further development spend without the need for
additional equity, Fitch forecasts net leverage reduction to 11x by
2027-2028, as the group limits asset acquisitions and does not plan
to pay ordinary dividends. Fitch expects EBITDA interest cover to
improve to 1.8x in 2027, from 1.2x.

Some Foreign-Currency Risk: In 2024, about 75% of DLIG rent came
from euro-denominated leases. This matches the currency of the
planned bond and most of the group's existing debt (87% outstanding
at end-2024). The remaining rents, mainly from retail assets, were
in Polish zloty.

Governance Structure Limitations: DLIG is controlled by Dominik
Leszczynski, a co-founder and CEO of the group. The concentrated,
private ownership means financial disclosure and corporate
governance are not comparable to listed companies.

Peer Analysis

DLIG's closest peer is MLP Group S.A. (BB+/Stable), with its PLN4.2
billion Poland-focused portfolio of mostly modern logistic and
industrial assets. DLIG and MLP's portfolios have asset and tenant
concentrations due to their limited size. This distinguishes them
from higher-rated continental European logistic peers, which have
larger, less concentrated portfolios.

Other Fitch-rated peers are central eastern European property
companies, especially Akropolis Group, UAB (BB+/Stable), whose EUR1
billion retail portfolio is similar to DLIG's in size and
concentration. However, DLIG's portfolio benefits from asset-class
diversification, with logistics (67% of market value) supplemented
with offices (24%) and retail (9%). The diversification of Globe
Trade Centre S.A. (GTC, BB/Rating Watch Negative) is higher, with
offices (52%), retail (29%) and residential-for-rent in Germany
(19%). GTC's portfolio value is EUR2.4 billion. The retail-focused
portfolio of NEPI Rockcastle N.V. (BBB+/Stable), valued at EUR6.9
billion, and Globalworth Real Estate Investments Limited's
(BBB-/Stable) office-focused EUR2.5 billion portfolio are larger
and more diversified.

Both DLIG and MLP have broadly comparable operating metrics with
high occupancy (DLIG's logistics: 98%; MLP: 95%) and WALB (DLIG's
logistics assets: 6.7 years, MLP: 8 years).

DLIG's financial profile, including Fitch-forecast net debt/EBITDA
improving to 11x in 2027, from 17x in 2025, is weaker than MLP's
leverage of around 10x. Akropolis has the most conservative
financial profile, with net debt/EBITDA forecast below 4.0x until
2026 and loan/value below 35%. Fitch expects Globalworth's net
debt/EBITDA to be about 8.5x. NEPI's financial profile is stronger
than Globalworth's.

The financial profiles of the rated western European logistic peers
are not directly comparable, as their assets are mostly in
countries with lower interest rate environments than in Poland.

Key Assumptions

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

- Rents modelled on an annualised cash-flow basis

- Annual rent increase of 30%-40% in 2025-2027, driven by rental
income from completed new developments and acquisitions coming
on-stream; like-for-like growth, including the CPI indexation
effect, and rent increases on renewals, limited to around 2% a
year

- About PLN1.5 billion of construction capex and over PLN900
million income-producing assets acquisitions until 2028

- No ordinary dividends paid for the next four years

- Emira's investment treated as DLIG's subordinated debt, adding
EUR175 million and about EUR7.2 million in interest expenses a
year

- Average cost of debt in 2025-2028 of 5.5%-6.1%

- Constant euro/zloty exchange rate at 4.3.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- Net debt/EBITDA consistently above 12.5x

- EBITDA interest cover consistently below 1.1x

- Loan/value above 65%

- Twelve-month liquidity score below 1.0x

- For the senior unsecured rating: unencumbered investment property
assets/unsecured debt ratio below 1x

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- Expansion of the portfolio reducing asset and tenant
concentration, while maintaining portfolio quality and above 95%
occupancy rate

- Net debt/EBITDA less than 11.5x on a sustained basis

- EBITDA interest cover above 1.25x on a sustained basis

- Unencumbered investment property assets/unsecured debt ratio
trending towards 1.5x

Liquidity and Debt Structure

DLIG held PLN128 million of readily available cash at end-2024,
which, pro forma for proceeds from the EUR350 million planned bond,
would increase cash sources to PLN1.6 billion. After deducting
about PLN1 billion designated for debt prepayment, the remaining
PLN600 million is ample to cover PLN30 million of debt maturing
during the next 12 months and Fitch-estimated negative free cash
flow of over PLN370 million, including committed and uncommitted
capex. DLIG does not have committed revolving credit facilities.

DLIG's debt is mainly secured, with most of its assets pledged to
banks. However, after prepayment of about PLN800 million of secured
debt, DLIG's unencumbered asset pool will increase to about PLN1.6
billion. Relevant to the planned unsecured bondholders, Fitch
expects the resultant Fitch-calculated income-producing investment
property assets/unsecured debt ratio at 1x.

The planned bond's draft documentation has a debt incurrence test
subject to a secured net debt/total assets ratio of maximum 50%
until end-2027 and 35% afterwards.

Date of Relevant Committee

27 June 2025

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

ESG Considerations

DLIG has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Governance Structure,
reflecting the lack of corporate governance attributes that would
mitigate key person risk from the majority beneficial owner and
CEO, Dominik Leszczynski. This has a negative impact on the credit
profile and is relevant to the ratings in conjunction with other
factors.

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt                  Rating                    Recovery

   -----------                  ------                    --------

DL Invest Group PM S.A.   LT IDR BB-      New Rating

   senior unsecured       LT     BB-(EXP) Expected Rating   RR4




=============
R O M A N I A
=============

ONIX ASIGURARI: A.M. Best Affirms B(Fair) Fin. Strength Rating
--------------------------------------------------------------
AM Best has affirmed the Financial Strength Rating of B (Fair) and
the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating of "bb+" (Fair) of ONIX
Asigurari S.A. (ONIX) (Romania). The outlook of these Credit
Ratings (ratings) is stable.

These ratings reflect ONIX's balance sheet strength, which AM Best
assesses as adequate, as well as its strong operating performance,
limited business profile and marginal enterprise risk management.

ONIX's risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by Best's Capital
Adequacy Ratio (BCAR), was assessed at the strongest level at
year-end 2024, underpinned by good internal capital generation.
However, ONIX's small capital base and its lack of reinsurance
protection increase the potential for volatility in risk-adjusted
capitalization, particularly considering its exposure to large
surety risks. The company's limited financial flexibility is also
considered an offsetting factor in its balance sheet strength
assessment. Conversely, AM Best views positively ONIX's
conservative investment portfolio, which is entirely made up of
cash or term deposits.

ONIX's operating performance is assessed at the strong level,
reflecting its track record of good technical results since
inception. For the five-year period ending in 2024, the company
reported a weighted average combined ratio of 55.7%, as calculated
by AM Best. Investment profits have improved in recent years,
benefiting from the healthy interest rates environment.

ONIX is a niche mono-line insurer that focuses on surety business
in Italy and Spain. The company leverages its specialist expertise
to compete against larger players.

Solvency II requirements are embedded within ONIX's risk framework
and its Solvency II regulatory capital adequacy ratio is monitored
against risk appetite levels approved by its board. The company's
risk management framework is evolving, and its risk management
capabilities are considered by AM Best to be below the company's
risk profile in some areas.




===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

BISHOPSTROW COLLEGE: Grant Thornton Named as Administrators
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bishopstrow College Limited was placed into administration
proceedings in The High Court Of Justice, Insolvency & Companies
List, No 000062 of 2025, and Alistair Wardell and Richard J Lewis
of Grant Thornton UK LLP were appointed as joint administrators on
June 30, 2025.  

Bishopstrow College Limited is a company that operates Bishopstrow
College, a UK-based independent international boarding school that
prepares students for entry into leading boarding schools in the UK
and overseas.

Its registered office is c/o Grant Thornton UK Advisory & Tax LLP,
11th Floor, Landmark St Peter's Square, 1 Oxford St, Manchester, M1
4PB

Its principal trading address is at Barrow House, Bishopstrow Road,
Bishopstrow, Warminster, BA12 9HU

The joint administrators can be reached at:

          Alistair Wardell
          Grant Thornton UK LLP
          6th Floor, 3 Callaghan Square
          Cardiff, CF10 5BT
          Tel No: 029 2023 5591

           -- and --
          
          Richard J Lewis
          Grant Thornton UK LLP
          2 Glass Wharf, Temple Quay
          Bristol, BS2 0EL
          Tel No: 0117 305 7600

For further information, contact:

           CMU Support
           Grant Thornton UK LLP
           Tel No: 0161 953 6906
           Email: cmusupport@uk.gt.com
           2 Glass Wharf, Temple Quay
           Bristol, BS2 0EL


CARNIVAL PLC: Fitch Rates EUR1-Bil. Unsecured Notes Due 2031 'BB+'
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Carnival plc (Carnival) anticipated EUR1
billion senior unsecured notes issuance due 2031 a 'BB+' rating
with a Recovery Rating of 'RR4'. Carnival's Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) remains at 'BB+' with a Positive Rating
Outlook, reflecting no material change in its EBITDA leverage since
the last review. The proceeds will be used to redeem a portion of
the senior secured term loan.

The Fitch-calculated 2025 estimated EBITDA leverage of 4.1x for
Carnival is in line with the 'BB+' range. Carnival benefits from
its scale, high operating margins, strong liquidity, and its
expectations of continued deleveraging. Potential risks include an
economic downturn that reduces leisure demand and higher fuel
prices.

The Positive Outlook reflects Fitch's belief that solid booking
activity will continue and management's commitment to debt
reduction will lead to stronger credit metrics.

Key Rating Drivers

Cruise Demand Remains Strong: Cruise companies benefit from
offering a better value proposition relative to resort vacations
and having a large base of repeat customers. Carnival, along with
Royal Caribbean and Norwegian Cruise Lines, has announced record
bookings for both 2025 and 2026. The long-term nature of cruise
bookings provides strong visibility, as cancellations are not
typically material. Carnival is guiding net yield growth to rise by
approximately 5.0% (constant currency) in 2025.

Continued Debt Reduction: Carnival's debt materially increased
during the pandemic to fund ship deliveries and cover operating
costs. Fitch expects debt to decline to $27 billion in 2025, from
$35.6 billion in 2022. Fitch also expects FCF growth and
management's commitment to investment-grade metrics to lead to a
rapid improvement in credit metrics. The decline in new ship
deliveries over the next three years should lead to greater FCF
growth and further debt reduction. Carnival also has approximately
$1.1 billion of convertible notes, which Fitch expects to be
largely settled through share exchanges.

Increased FCF Growth: Fitch expects EBITDA growth, lower interest
costs from debt reduction, and lower growth capex to result in
higher FCF through the forecast horizon. Fitch estimates FCF will
grow to $1.6 billion in 2025 and materially thereafter. Carnival
should also benefit from higher customer deposits given the
continued growth in bookings. Fitch does not anticipate any
material shareholder returns until the company achieves
investment-grade status.

Leader in Cruise Industry: Carnival is the world's largest cruise
operator with multiple brands. Due to its brand acceptance and
market leading capacity, the company holds the top market share in
the North American and European markets, which contribute most of
its EBITDA. Historically, the company's scale has been a credit
positive, but pandemic-related disruptions severely impacted
Carnival due to its high fixed-cost structure and resulted in
delayed ship deliveries. Under normal cruise operating conditions,
Fitch considers Carnival's scale a positive factor.

Moderate Industry Capacity Growth: Capacity growth is expected to
be somewhat muted over the next several years given the reduction
of new ship orders during the pandemic, as industry credit metrics
weakened. However, Fitch believes lower supply growth will support
net yield growth in the near term. Recent announcements of new ship
builds will mostly not affect the market until the end of the
decade, although capacity growth would still be modest.

Favorable Industry Dynamics: The top players in the cruise line
industry benefit from high barriers to entry due to significant
ship capex spend, low global market penetration rates relative to
other leisure activities, mobile assets that allow companies to
move to other markets when existing markets are facing uncertain
economic or geopolitical issues, and favorable tax treatment given
their incorporation outside the U.S.

Peer Analysis

Carnival is the largest cruise ship operator in terms of berths and
passengers carried compared to Royal Caribbean Inc. (BBB-/Positive)
and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Ltd. (NR). Carnival is also
compared to other high-'BB' and low-'BBB' leisure credits, such as
Hyatt Hotels Corporation (BBB-/Stable) and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
Inc. (BB+/Stable).

Carnival has materially greater scale and geographic
diversification than its comparable peers, although leverage is
higher. Fitch believes Carnival's scale and FCF generation will
result in materially improved credit metrics that will be more
indicative of an investment-grade credit over the forecast
horizon.

Key Assumptions

- Passengers carried expected to grow in the low-single digits
during the forecast horizon. Occupancy expected to increase to 106%
in 2026 and beyond;

- Net yields are expected to increase 5% in 2025 and in the low- to
mid-single digits over the remainder of the forecast horizon, which
is below management guidance;

- Adjusted cruise costs per available lower berth days, excluding
fuel, are forecast to increase in the low- to mid-single digits
over the forecast horizon;

- Capex, including new ship deliveries, is expected to drop to $3.7
billion in 2025 and $3.6 billion in 2026;

- There are no assumptions for share repurchases, common dividends,
acquisitions or asset sales;

- FCF is expected to be applied to debt reduction through the
forecast horizon.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- EBITDA Leverage sustaining above 4.5x;

- Economic or geopolitical event that lasts for an extended period
and results in a deterioration of the capital structure (i.e.
increased debt, use of secured or priority guaranteed financing);

- A more aggressive financial policy that includes accelerated ship
building plans or increased shareholder allocations that would
allow for credit metrics to become vulnerable during a weaker
economic environment.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- Sustainable positive FCF with application to debt payment;

- EBITDA leverage approaching 4.0x;

- A debt structure that does not include secured or guaranteed
debt;

- (CFO-Capex)/Debt is greater than 10%.

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Carnival had $2.1 billion of cash and. $8.4 billion of undrawn
export credit facilities to fund ship deliveries planned through
2033. The company also has $4.5 billion of borrowings available
under its current RCF, maturing in June 2030. Fitch expects
Carnival to be FCF positive through the forecast horizon, which
further enhances liquidity.

Proceeds from the proposed Euro 1 billion senior unsecured note
issuance due 2031 will be used to repay borrowings under the
Secured Term Loan Facilities.

Carnival has material debt repayments due over the next several
years, including $4.4 billion due in 2027 and $6.1 billion due in
2028 pro forma the refinancing. Fitch believes debt reduction,
potential conversion of convertible debt exchanged into shares, and
refinancing opportunities should allow the company to address its
debt repayment schedule.

Fitch expects new ship deliveries to decline over the forecast
horizon. The company plans no ship additions in 2026, and will add
one each in 2027 and 2028. The company recently announced three new
ships for the Carnival brand and two ships for the Aida brand, but
the first delivery is not until 2029.

Issuer Profile

Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc (together, Carnival) is the
largest global cruise company and among the largest leisure travel
companies, with a portfolio of world-class cruise lines.

Date of Relevant Committee

May 9, 2025

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt             Rating         Recovery   
   -----------             ------         --------   
Carnival plc

   senior unsecured    LT BB+  New Rating   RR4


COGNITA: S&P Assigns 'B-' Rating on Term Loan Facilities
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B-' issue rating to the proposed
euro- and U.S. dollar-denominated term loan facilities to be issued
by Lernen Bidco Ltd. and Lernen US Finco LLC, subsidiaries of
Lernen Bondco PLC (Cognita; B-/Positive/--). These include a GBP200
million-equivalent add-on split across the two tranches, due in
2029 and 2031, respectively. S&P assigns a '3' recovery rating to
this debt, indicating its expectation of meaningful recovery
prospects of 50% in a hypothetical event of a default.

Cognita intends to use proceeds of the add-on to the term loans to
repay some deferred considerations related to previous acquisitions
with the remaining amount (approximately GBP160 million) to be
retained on the balance sheet and allocated to support upcoming
acquisition opportunities.

This transaction will increase Cognita's total debt by GBP200
million and will result in S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA ratio increasing toward 8.3x by the end of fiscal
2025 (Aug. 31, 2025), marginally above our previous expectation of
7.8x. However, S&P expects leverage to decline in fiscal 2026
toward 7.0x (compared with 6.8x previously), supported by EBITDA
contribution from the acquired schools.

This results in a minor delay to Cognita's projected deleveraging
timeline. Nevertheless, the additional funding will support the
group's growth plans and, given the group's strong track record of
successful integration of acquisitions and solid operational
performance, S&P considers this transaction to be in alignment with
the current rating level.

S&P's 'B-' issuer credit rating on the company, and the positive
outlook, are therefore unchanged.

The final amounts and closure of the proposed financing are subject
to successful execution of the transaction. The issue and recovery
ratings are subject to S&P's review of the final documentation.

  Learnen Bondco PLC--Forecast summary*

  Period ending                Aug-31-2024   2025    2026    2027

  (Mil. GBP)                         2024a   2025e   2026f   2027f
  Revenue                            1,015   1,121   1,280  1,396
  EBITDA                             256     298     351     401
  Funds from operations (FFO)        70      96      130     184
  Capital expenditure (capex)        85      135     108     101
  Free operating cash flow (FOCF)    51     (24)     51      107
  FOCF (after leases)                36     (38)     37      94
  Debt                               2,088   2,486   2,466   2,421

  Adjusted ratios

  Debt/EBITDA (x)                    8.1     8.3     7.0     6.0
  FFO/debt (%)                       3.3     3.9     5.3     7.6
  FFO cash interest coverage (x)     1.4     1.6     1.7     2.0
  FOCF/debt (%)                      2.4    (0.9)    2.1     4.4
  Annual revenue growth (%)          18.3    10.4    14.2    9.1
  EBITDA margin                      25.2    26.6    27.4    28.7

*All figures adjusted by S&P Global Ratings.
a--Actual.
e--Estimate.
f--Forecast.

Issue Ratings--Recovery Analysis

Key analytical factors

-- S&P has assigned its 'B-' issue rating to the senior secured
debt including the proposed GBP200 million-equivalent term loan
add-on, with a recovery rating of '3', reflecting its expectation
of meaningful recovery prospects (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%)
in the event of a default.

-- S&P said, "In our view, recovery prospects are affected by the
sizable amount of senior secured debt and the presence of local
debt facilities. We note that the company remains reliant on local
facilities, which we consider priority debt, thus affecting the
recovery prospects of the rest of the capital structure."

-- S&P understands that the group will continue investing in the
development of new schools and acquisitions, which could enhance
EBITDA generation in the medium term and thus, the potential EBITDA
at emergence in a hypothetical default scenario.

-- In S&P's hypothetical default scenario, it assumes a sharp drop
in private school enrolments for a sustained period, due to weaker
economic conditions, increased competition, and political or
operational shocks, for example, significant reputational damage.

-- S&P values the group as a going concern, due to its
geographically diversified portfolio of schools; good revenue
visibility, given that the average student tenure is longer than
five years; and the strong brand names of its schools.

The pro forma capital structure following the proposed transaction
is as follows:

-- GBP310 million revolving credit facility (RCF), maturing in
October 2028;

-- GBP1,062 million-equivalent euro-denominated term loan B (TLB),
maturing in April 2029;

-- GBP350 million U.S. dollar-denominated TLB, maturing in
September 2031;

-- GBP200 million-equivalent proposed TLB add-on; and

-- GBP226 million of local facilities.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Year of default: 2027
-- Jurisdiction: U.K.

Simplified waterfall

-- EBITDA at emergence: GBP194 million.

-- Implied enterprise value (EV) multiple: 6.5x, higher than the
standard industry multiple of 5.5x, owing to private school
operators' better revenue visibility and free cash flow capacity
than other types of enterprise in the business and consumer
services sector.

-- Gross EV at default: GBP1.3 billion.

-- Net EV after administrative costs (5%): GBP1.2 billion.

-- Estimated priority claims (local debt): GBP200 million.

-- Estimated first-lien claims: GBP1,949 million.

-- Recovery rating: '3' (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%)

Note: All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.
First-lien claims include the GBP310 million RCF assumed 85% drawn
at default.


DRAIN PEOPLE: Exigen Group Named as Administrators
--------------------------------------------------
The Drain People Ltd was placed into administration proceedings in
the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts in
Manchester, Insolvency & Companies List (ChD), Court Number:
CR-2025-000949, and David Kemp and Richard Hunt of Exigen Group
Limited were appointed as administrators on July 2, 2025.  

Based in Leicestershire, UK, The Drain People Ltd is a family-run
drainage solutions company that offered a wide range of services
including drain unblocking, clearing, repairing, and CCTV surveys.


The Company's registered office is at Warehouse W, 3 Western
Gateway, Royal Victoria Docks, London, E16 1BD

Its principal trading address is at Unit S5, 7 Hawker Business
Park, Melton Road, Burton-On-The-Wolds, Loughborough, England, LE12
5TQ

The joint administrators can be reached at:

      David Kemp
      Richard Hunt
      Exigen Group Limited
      Warehouse W, 3 Western Gateway
      Royal Victoria Docks
      London E16 1BD

For further details, contact:

      David Kemp
      Tel No: 0207 538 2222


EG GROUP: Moody's Affirms 'B3' CFR & Alters Outlook to Positive
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has affirmed the B3 long term corporate family
rating of global independent fuel forecourt retailer EG Group
Limited (EG, EG Group or the company) and its B3-PD probability of
default rating. Concurrently, Moody's have affirmed the B3 ratings
on EG's backed senior secured bank credit facilities and senior
secured instrument ratings issued by its subsidiaries EG Finco
Limited, EG Global Finance plc. and EG America LLC. The outlook has
been changed to positive from stable for all entities.

The rating action reflects:

-- Expected deleveraging to below 6.0x (on a Moody's-adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA basis) within the next 12-18 months, supported by
management's commitment to decrease company-adjusted net
debt-to-EBITDA to 4.5x in the near term.

-- Enhanced governance, driven by a strengthened management team,
a refined strategic focus on operational improvements, and improved
independent board representation.

-- Moody's expectations that EG will maintain adequate liquidity
with no material upcoming maturities.

RATINGS RATIONALE      

EG's B3 CFR continues to reflect its strong position as a large,
independent motor-fuel forecourt operator. The company owns
multiple networks of petrol stations, convenience stores and
foodservice outlets across the US, Europe, and Australia where it
holds leading market positions. The sector benefits from broadly
stable patterns because favourable trends in convenience shopping
and foodservice largely offset gradually falling fuel demand due to
increased vehicle fuel efficiency and rising electric vehicle (EV)
penetration.

Moody's expects leverage to decrease towards 6x in the next 12-18
months from 6.7x for the last twelve months to March 31, 2025. The
first quarter of 2025 was adversely affected by bad weather
conditions but Moody's expects improved performance throughout the
rest of the year, supported by the company's focus on strategic
initiatives to grow the business organically. The company is
committed to reducing debt further and deleveraging towards 4.5x,
on a company-adjusted net debt-to-EBITDA basis, in the near term.

Conversely, the CFR also reflects EG's high operating leverage due
to the prevalence of the company owned, company operated (COCO).
EG's credit metrics still remain weak, with Moody's-adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA of 6.7x, EBITDA-capex/interest expense around 1.0x
and minimal free cash flow generation for the LTM to March 31,
2025. However, Moody's expects these to improve over the next 12-18
months given its public statement to delever. The rating also
factors the challenging and uncertain macroeconomic conditions with
consumer spending growth in the US likely to slow through the
remainder of 2025. Moody's also recognises the longer term
challenge the company faces to manage the transition to alternative
fuel and the need to manage potential investment requirements.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL & GOVERNANCE CONSIDERATIONS

EG's ESG Credit Impact Score of CIS-4 indicates the rating is lower
than it would have been if ESG risk exposures did not exist. EG's
CIS-4 is driven by Moody's assessments that environmental, social
and governance all have an impact on the current ratings. High
carbon transition related risks are the main driver of EG's
exposure to environmental risk. Social risks are mainly driven by
increasing demographic and social pressures affecting future fuel
demand in light of the electrification of vehicles.

Governance risk exposure reflects the majority private equity
ownership and historically aggressive financial strategy, with a
history of debt funded acquisitions. Governance risks are somewhat
mitigated by the progress made over the past three years,
particularly over the last few months with the appointment of an
additional independent board director, as well as strengthening the
management team with senior specialised executives.

LIQUIDITY

Moody's considers EG's liquidity to be adequate, with cash on
balance sheet of $249 million in addition to the $233 million
available under its revolving credit facilities (RCF), as of March
31, 2025. Moody's expects the company to draw on its RCF to meet
its cash flow requirements. EG has a substantial freehold portfolio
valued at around $4 billion, providing further financial
flexibility. The ability of the company to make use of its asset
portfolio as an alternative source of liquidity was demonstrated by
the sale and leaseback transaction in the US completed in May
2023.

STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS

The B3 ratings of the backed senior secured instruments is in line
with the CFR and reflects the company's capital structure becoming
all senior and pari passu ranking, following the repayment of its
second lien debt at the end of 2024, and hence the instrument
ratings are now aligned with the CFR.

OUTLOOK

The positive outlook reflects Moody's expectations that leverage
will trend towards Moody's upward rating guidance over the next
12-18 months of below 6.0x, supported by management's committed to
deleverage is the near term. The outlook also incorporates
expectations of improved operational performance, with the company
growing its adjusted EBITDA. It further assumes that liquidity will
remain at least adequate.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if the company is able to reduce
leverage, as evidenced by Moody's adjusted gross debt to EBITDA,
below 6.0x improving interest coverage, as measured by adjusted
EBITDA - CAPEX / interest expense, towards 1.5x, and achieve
significant positive free cash flow generation. An upgrade would
also require the company to maintain at least adequate liquidity.

EG's ratings could be downgraded if it is unable to grow its
EBITDA, resulting in leverage not decreasing, free cash flow
remains negative or Moody's adjusted EBITDA - CAPEX/ interest
expense remains below 1.0x for a prolonged period.

LIST OF AFECTED RATINGS

Issuer: EG Group Limited

Affirmations:

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD

LT Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

Issuer: EG America LLC

Affirmations:

Backed Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility (Local Currency),
Affirmed B3

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

Issuer: EG Finco Limited

Affirmations:

Backed Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility (Local Currency),
Affirmed B3

Backed Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility (Foreign Currency),
Affirmed B3

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

Issuer: EG Global Finance plc.

Affirmations:

Senior Secured (Foreign Currency), Affirmed B3

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail and
Apparel published in November 2023.

EG's CFR is three notches below the Ba3 scorecard-indicated
outcome. The difference reflects the greater importance of the
company's weaker credit metrics when assigning the actual rating.

COMPANY PROFILE

EG Group is a global retailer operating petrol stations,
convenience stores and foodservice outlets in Europe, the United
States and Australia. The group was created through the merger of
Euro Garages and European Forecourt Retail (EFR) Group in 2016. EG
has evolved through a series of acquisitions to become one of the
leading independent motor-fuel forecourt operators in Europe, the
US and Australia. Pro forma for recent disposals of the company's
remaining UK business reported revenue was $23 billion and company
adjusted EBITDA $1.3 billion (on an IFRS 16 basis) for the last
twelve months to March 31, 2025.

The group is headquartered in Blackburn, England and is owned
equally by funds managed by TDR Capital LLP and the two brothers
who founded Euro Garages, Mohsin and Zuber Issa.


GORDON NICOLSON: JT Maxwell Named as Administrators
---------------------------------------------------
Gordon Nicolson Kiltmakers Ltd was placed into administration
proceedings in The Edinburgh Sheriff Court Court Number:
EDI-L93-25, and Andrew Ryder of JT Maxwell Limited was appointed as
administrators on June 30, 2025.  

Gordon Nicolson was into the retail sale of clothing in specialised
stores.

Its registered office and principal trading address is at 189
Canaongate, The Royalmile, Edinburgh, EH8 8BN.

The joint administrators can be reached at:

            Andrew Ryder
            JT Maxwell Limited
            Po Box 160
            Blyth NE24 9GP

For further information, contact:
           
            JT Maxwell Limited
            Email: corporate@jtmaxwell.co.uk.
            Tel No: 02892 448 110


MAISON BIDCO: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B' on Ongoing Margin Pressure
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer credit rating on
U.K.-based homebuilder Maison Bidco Ltd. (Maison) to 'B' from 'B+'.
At the same time, S&P lowered the issue rating to 'B', for which
the recovery rating remains '3', on the developer's GBP275 million
senior secured bond, indicating its expectation of about 60%
recovery in the event of a payment default. The stable outlook
reflects S&P's view that Maison' adjusted debt to EBITDA will
remain at about 4.0x and EBITDA interest coverage matures at about
3.5x in 2025 and 2026.

S&P said, "The downgrade reflects weaker operating performance and
our view that recovery will be further delayed with its leverage
exceeding our requirements for a 'B' rating level. Maison generated
weaker than expected S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA in the
first half-year of 2025 (ending April 30, 2025) owing to a
sustained period of stable sales prices but elevated cost
inflation, which led to an increase in debt to EBITDA of 4.1x
(rolling 12 months as of April 30, 2025), exceeding our downside
threshold for the 'B' rating. While overall mortgage access and
affordability show signs of improvement, we expect volumes for 2025
to decline by 6% to around 3,300 units for the full year (ending
October 2025) from 3,516 units year-end 2024 and compared with
4,074 units in 2023."

In the first six months of fiscal 2025, Maison's completions
declined by 5.7% year on year to 1,308 units, but its average
selling price increased by 11.9% annually to GBP234,000, driven
mainly by product and geographic mix effects. While total revenues
increased by 5.2% annually to GBP306.1 million, reported EBITDA
margin declined to 4.6% compared with 7.3% in the same period in
the previous year. The S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margin
declined to 8.9% (RTM) compared with 10.2% in the same period in
the previous year. S&P said, "We have updated our base case and
forecast a longer period of recovery to what we previously
anticipated. We expect that in fiscal 2025 and in fiscal 2026,
Maison's average selling price will remain at about
GBP230,000-GBP234,000. We forecast total revenues will amount to
about GBP770 million (0.8% increase from GBP764 million in 2024,
but EBITDA will likely decline to about GBP70 million compared with
GBP73.6 million in 2024 and GBP99.6 million in 2023)."

S&P said, "As a result of ongoing cost pressure, we anticipate the
EBITDA margin to remain relatively low at 9.0%-9.5% in 2025 and
2026, below our prior expectations of a recovery close to 10% in
2026. We forecast debt to EBITDA to remain elevated at 4.0x over
the next 12-18 months.

"FOCF turned negative in fiscal 2024 and we expect it to remain
constrained over the next 12-18 months. In fiscal 2024, Maison
reported a negative FOCF of about GBP11 million, per S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted calculations. Following our expectations on EBITDA
margin pressure, working capital outflow of GBP50 million-GBP60
million annually, we anticipate that Maison will continue
generating negative adjusted FOCF in the range of GBP35
million-GBP45 million range in 2025 and 2026.

"We expect Maison to maintain a solid debt servicing capacity over
our forecast horizon. We forecast Maison's EBITDA interest coverage
to be about 3.5x-3.7x in 2025-2026 (3.5x as of end of April 2025),
supported by the fixed interest rate on GBP275 million senior
secured notes due in 2027 of 6%. The ratio has declined from 3.8x
in fiscal 2024 and 5.2x in fiscal 2023 but remains in line with
peers, rated in the 'B' category.

"We think that Maison's multi-tenure business model, which combines
open-market sales and sales to registered providers, moderates
market volatility. In our view, Maison's revenue expectations in
2024 and the first six months of 2025 have remained robust. We
think that part of Maison's sales coming from partnerships with
local authorities and registered providers moderate revenue
cyclicality, including public- and private-sector entities that are
registered with the Regulator of Social Housing to provide
affordable housing and are funded by the U.K. government. The
company reported GBP306 million of revenue for the six months,
ending April 30, 2025, compared with GBP291 million in the same
period in the previous year. About GBP95.4 million of revenue stems
from registered providers and development contracts, an increase of
12% from GBP85.2 million in the same period last year. We think
that demand for Maison's homes could be supported by further
interest rate cuts by the Bank of England, and we expect one rate
cut per quarter until the bank rate reaches 3.5% in February 2026.

"CEO Tim Beale will depart after eight years of service. We
understand the handover to Ian Hoad, who joined the company in
1996, and has been divisional chairman since 2019, started on July
1, 2025. We currently do not see a credit impact from the announced
change and understand that the company has maintained its overall
strategy and goals.

"We view Maison's liquidity position as adequate, with ample cash
balance and available credit facilities despite weaker operating
results. As of April 31, 2025, the company had GBP67 million in
unrestricted cash and GBP70 million availability under its
revolving credit facility (RCF) and we expect that this will be
sufficient to maintain current operations and future growth
initiatives. While Maison benefits from a solid average debt
maturity profile exceeding two years and in line with our criteria,
its next large maturity comprises the senior secured notes due in
2027. We expect the company to address its maturity well ahead to
ensure sustainably adequate liquidity assessment. We further
understand that its covenant headroom remains solid.

"The stable outlook reflects our view that Maison's adjusted debt
to EBITDA will remain at about 4.0x and EBITDA interest coverage
matures at about 3.5x in 2025 and 2026."

S&P could lower the rating on Maison if:

-- S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA increases to well
above 5.0x; or

-- EBITDA interest coverage deteriorates to well below 2.0x on a
sustained basis with no short-term recovery potential.

S&P said, "This could occur, if Maison's operating performance
weakens more than we currently anticipate because of a slowdown of
the sales rate, decline on average selling prices, or a strong
decline in demand for its homes. Maison's FOCF deteriorating beyond
our current forecast--which will lead to a debt increase or
liquidity cushion to shrink, e.g. due to late refinancing
activities of the upcoming bond maturity in 2027--could also result
in a negative rating action."

S&P could upgrade the rating on Maison if:

-- S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA reducing to
comfortably below 4.0x; and

-- EBITDA interest coverage remains above 3.0x.

This could happen if Maison benefits from improved market
conditions supporting sales and completion rates, combined with
margin improvement due to an efficient cost management.

A positive rating action would also hinge on the company generating
positive FOCF. Maison should also be able to demonstrate adequate
liquidity, including sufficient headroom under its covenants, and
access to its RCF to fund its working capital needs and support its
growth.


NORTHERN REFRIGERATION: Leonard Curtis Named as Administrators
--------------------------------------------------------------
Northern Refrigeration & Catering Equipment Ltd. was placed into
administration proceedings in the High Court of Justice, Business
and Property Court in Manchester, Company and Insolvency List CHD,
Court Number: CR-2025-000876.  Danielle Shore and Richard Pinder of
Leonard Curtis were appointed as administrators on July 1, 2025.  

Northern Refrigeration is a manufacturer of kitchen furniture.

The Company's registered office will be changed to Leonard Curtis,
4th Floor, Fountain Precinct, Leopold Street, Sheffield, S1 2JA,
having previously been Eckington Business Park, Rotherside Road,
Eckington, Sheffield, S21 4HL

Its principal trading address is at Eckington Business Park,
Rotherside Road, Eckington, Sheffield, S21 4HL

The joint administrators can be reached at:

     Danielle Shore
     Leonard Curtis
     4th Floor, Fountain Precinct
     Leopold Street
     Sheffield S1 2JA
       
        -- and --
       
     Richard Pinder
     Leonard Curtis
     21 Gander Lane, Barlborough
     Chesterfield, S43 4PZ
       
Contact information for Administrators:
                
     The Joint Administrators
     Tel No: 0114 385 9500

Alternative contact:

     Elaine Holland


PADWORTH COLLEGE: Grant Thornton Named as Administrators
--------------------------------------------------------
Padworth College Limited was placed into administration proceedings
in the High Court Of Justice, Insolvency & Companies List, No
000063 of 2025, and Alistair Wardell and Richard J Lewis of Grant
Thornton UK LLP were appointed as joint administrators on June 30,
2025.  

Padworth College Limited is a private limited company operating in
the general secondary education sector in the UK.

Its registered office is c/o Grant Thornton UK Advisory & Tax LLP,
11th Floor, Landmark St Peter's Square, 1 Oxford St, Manchester, M1
4PB

Its principal trading address is Padworth College, Sopers Lane,
Padworth, Reading, RG7 4NR

The joint administrators can be reached at:

       Alistair Wardell
       Grant Thornton UK LLP
       6th Floor, 3 Callaghan Square
       Cardiff, CF10 5BT
       Tel No: 029 2023 5591

          -- and --
          
       Richard J Lewis
       Grant Thornton UK LLP
       2 Glass Wharf, Temple Quay
       Bristol, BS2 0EL
       Tel No: 0117 305 7600

For further information, contact:

       CMU Support
       Grant Thornton UK LLP
       2 Glass Wharf, Temple Quay
       Bristol, BS2 0EL
       Email: cmusupport@uk.gt.com
       Tel No: 0161 953 6906


R3 IOT: AAB Business Named as Administrators
--------------------------------------------
R3 IOT Limited was placed into administration proceedings in the
Court of Session, No P599 of 2025, and David McGinness and Judith
Howson of AAB Business & Tax Advisory LLP were appointed as
administrators on June 24, 2025.  

R3 IOT Limited, trading a Krucial, specialized in engineering
design activities for industrial process and production.

The Company's registered office is at 133 Finnieston Street,
Glasgow, G3 8HB

Its principal trading address is at 6/3 Turnberry House, 175 West
George Street, Glasgow G2 2LB

The joint administrators can be reached at:

     David McGinness
     Judith Howson
     AAB Business & Tax Advisory LLP
     133 Finnieston Street
     Glasgow, G3 8HB

For further details, contact:

     The Joint Liquidators
     Tel: 0141 221 2984
     Email: restructuring@aab.uk

Alternative contact:

     Claire Smith
     Tel: 0141 221 2984
     Email: restructuring@aab.uk


WD FF LIMITED: Fitch Affirms 'B' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed WD FF Limited's (Iceland) Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B' with a Stable Outlook. Fitch
also affirmed the senior secured notes issued by Iceland Bondco
PLC, the company's subsidiary, at 'B+' with a Recovery Rating of
'RR3'.

Iceland's IDR reflects its small scale and moderately high
leverage, which are balanced by a specialist retail business model
focused on the frozen food category and on value-seeking consumers.
The company has a record of resilient profits through business
cycles, except in FY23 (year-end March), when it was hit by high
electricity costs.

The Stable Outlook reflects the continued strength of its value
positioning despite heightened UK competition. Fitch expects
Iceland will keep generating mildly positive free cash flow (FCF),
despite intensifying capex over FY25-FY27.

Key Rating Drivers

Resilient Market Share: Iceland's value positioning is a major
support to its sales volume, market share and like- for-like volume
growth in the UK grocery market, which underpins its Stable
Outlook. The company's market share has remained resilient, at
2.3%-2.4%, over 2020-2025, despite the rapid growth of discounters
raising their market share by 5% in the same period.

Fitch expects Iceland's product offering to remain competitive for
UK food consumers with weaker spending power, despite stiff
competition. The company is the UK's second-largest frozen food
retailer, after Tesco. Its continued investment in pricing and new
store formats, and strong online offering, help the company to
defend its market share and grow revenues.

Leverage Aligned with Rating: Fitch projects Iceland's EBITDAR
gross leverage to remain at 4.8x-5.0-x over FY25-FY27, which
provides adequate headroom under its 'B' rating. Fitch reflects
Iceland's flexible lease terms and IFRS lease liabilities in its
leverage calculations, in line with its new criteria. This reduced
its calculated gross leverage by 1.1x, compared with its earlier
calculation, where Fitch capitalised its lease proxy using an 8x
multiple. The high incidence of leases compresses fixed-charge
cover to 1.4x, marginally lower than the 1.5x minimum for the 'B'
IDR, although Fitch expects a mild improvement towards the
threshold.

Momentary Profit Pressure: Fitch projects Iceland's EBITDA margin
will fall slightly, to 3.6% in FY26, due to labour cost increases
and continued investment in price to drive volume growth, from its
estimate of a 3.7% flat margin in FY25. The company, along with
other UK-based retailers, will be hit by the rise in national
insurance and minimum living wage contributions from FY26, which
Fitch estimates will result in an additional cost of GBP50 million.
Fitch expects the company to be able to recoup some costs with cost
savings, including efficiency gains from its new Warrington
distribution centre, limiting margin contraction.

Expansionary Capex Limits Cash Generation: Fitch expects Iceland's
capex to remain high in FY26-FY27, averaging GBP80 million a year,
following an estimated spend of GBP70 million in FY25, due to the
investment in the Warrington depot. Large investments in their
manufacturing capabilities and capacity, supply chain efficiencies
and store refurbishments, alongside the rollout of about 15 new
warehouse stores annually, will constrain cash flow. As a result,
Fitch forecasts FCF margins to remain neutral from FY25 to FY27,
returning to around 1% in FY28 once capex normalises to GBP50
million.

EBITDA Improvement Expected from FY26: The strategic investments in
new manufacturing capabilities, supply chain improvements and store
refurbishments are expected to drive EBITDA growth from FY26. These
initiatives, together with continued warehouse store expansion and
the rationalisation of the core stores, are anticipated to support
margin improvement, with EBITDA margin forecast to reach 3.9% by
FY28.

Restricted Group Includes Restaurants: Iceland's restaurant
business - under subsidiary Individual Restaurants Limited - became
a guarantor of its senior secured notes in 2024 and is included in
the restricted group. Fitch has included its revenue, EBITDA
contribution from FY24, although the latter and its debt are
immaterial to its metrics calculations. Most of this business' debt
has been repaid, leaving a GBP18 million shareholder loan. Fitch
treats the loan as debt, given its upcoming contractual maturity,
although Iceland expects it to continue to be rolled over.

Peer Analysis

Iceland's business risk profile, as a mostly UK-based specialist
food retailer, is constrained by its modest size and lower
diversification compared with other Fitch-rated European food
retailers, such as Tesco PLC (BBB/Stable), Bellis Finco plc (ASDA;
B+/Stable) and Market Holdco 3 Limited (Morrisons; B/Positive).

All three peers are larger, have greater diversification and a
higher share of freehold store ownership compared with Iceland.
Iceland has a smaller market share than those peers in the UK
grocery sector but is second behind Tesco in the frozen food
category. Also, its offer is not confined to frozen food, with 60%
of its revenue generated from the sales of other food and, to a
more limited extent, non-food products.

Fitch estimates Iceland's EBITDAR gross leverage to have fallen to
about 4.9x in FY25, which is lower than that of other Fitch-rated
UK peers' in the 'B' category. Fitch expects Morrisons to
deleverage to near 6.0x by 2025 and ASDA to below 5.0x in 2025.

Iceland is larger in sales than Picard Bondco S.A. (B/Stable), a
French specialist food retailer also active in frozen foods, but
its profitability is materially weaker (EBITDAR margin of 6% versus
Picard's 17%). This makes them comparable at the EBITDAR level but
supports superior cash flow generation at Picard versus other food
retailers. Picard operates mostly in the higher-margin premium food
category and benefits from a strong brand awareness. Picard's
EBITDAR gross leverage of around 7.0x has been higher than that of
Iceland. The latter is driven by Iceland's more conservative
capital-allocation policy and continued focus on deleveraging.

Key Assumptions

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within its Rating Case for the Issuer:

- Retail revenue flat in FY25 and up about 2.6% in FY26, followed
by low single-digit growth to FY28, primarily driven by higher net
store openings and increased sales

- Twelve net new store openings a year over FY26-FY28

- EBITDA margin gradually increasing towards 4% (FY24: 3.7%), as
cost savings offset wage inflation

- Working capital broadly stable in FY25-FY28

- Capex around GBP70 million on average a year for FY25-FY28

- No dividends until FY28

Recovery Analysis

Fitch's Key Recovery Rating Assumptions:

Fitch's recovery analysis assumed that Iceland would be reorganised
as a going concern in bankruptcy rather than liquidated. Fitch has
assumed a 10% administrative claim.

Its going concern EBITDA estimate of GBP120 million reflects a
sustainable, post-reorganisation EBITDA on which Fitch bases the
enterprise valuation. The assumption also reflects corrective
measures taken in the reorganisation to offset the adverse
conditions that trigger its default, such as cost-cutting efforts
or a material business repositioning.

Fitch applied a multiple of 4.5x to the going-concern EBITDA to
calculate a post-reorganisation enterprise valuation.

The EUR50 million RCF is super senior to the company's senior notes
in the debt waterfall and Fitch has assumed it to be fully drawn in
default. Its waterfall analysis generates a ranked recovery for
Iceland's senior secured notes in the 'RR3' category, resulting in
a 'B+' rating.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- Decline in like-for-like sales, with a loss of market share due
to competition or to permanently lower capex, or an inability to
pass on cost inflation to consumers, leading to accelerating EBITDA
margin erosion or neutral FCF on a sustained basis

- Tightening of liquidity due to unexpected cash outflows

- EBITDAR gross leverage above 5.5x on a sustained basis

- EBITDAR fixed-charge coverage consistently below 1.5x

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- Like-for-like sales rises and the maintenance of stable market
shares, leading to increases in EBITDA margin towards 5%

- EBITDAR gross leverage below 4.5x on a sustained basis

- EBITDAR fixed-charge coverage above 1.8x for an extended period

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Iceland's liquidity is comfortable, with an estimated cash balance
of just over GBP100 million at FYE25, after excluding GBP20 million
restricted cash for seasonal working-capital swings (Fitch's
adjustment). In addition, the company has an undrawn RCF.

Iceland's debt maturity profile is concentrated in December 2027,
and Fitch does not expect, due to neutral to mildly positive FCF
projected over FY25-FY28, that the company will accumulate
materially more cash than it has today by the maturity. However,
refinancing risk is manageable given the expectation of no increase
in leverage, the presence of a good liquidity buffer that could be
used to reduce the amount of debt to be refinanced and the ability
to reduce capex and generate more FCF.

Issuer Profile

Iceland is a British food retailer specialising in frozen and
chilled food products at a low price point. It operates around
1,000 stores across the UK.

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt              Rating        Recovery   Prior
   -----------              ------        --------   -----
Iceland Bondco PLC

   senior secured     LT     B+ Affirmed    RR3      B+

WD FF Limited         LT IDR B  Affirmed             B



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2025.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *