/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/250310.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Monday, March 10, 2025, Vol. 26, No. 49

                           Headlines



A U S T R I A

SAPPI PAPIER: Fitch Rates New EUR300MM Unsec. Notes Due 2032 'BB+'


F R A N C E

SEQUANS COMMUNICATIONS: Names Dr. Qiuting Huang as CTO


I T A L Y

FEDRIGONI SPA: S&P Assigns 'B-' LongTerm ICR, Outlook Stable
INTESA SANPAOLO: Fitch Rates EUR500MM Sub. Tier 2 Bond 'BB+'
MAIOR SPV: DBRS Cuts Class A Notes Rating to CC


L U X E M B O U R G

ALTISOURCE PORTFOLIO: Credit Investments Holds 22.7% Equity Stake
TARKETT PARTICIPATION: S&P Alters Outlook on B+ ICR to Positive


N E T H E R L A N D S

STAMINA BIDCO: S&P Discontinues 'B+' ICR Upon Acquisition by Skio


S P A I N

CAIXABANK RMBS 2: DBRS Confirms BB(high) Rating on B Notes


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

CARCO PRP: S&P Assigns Prelim. 'B' LongTerm ICR on Refinancing
CASTELL PLC 2023-1: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Rating on Class F Notes
DILOSK RMBS 8: DBRS Confirms B(high) Rating on Class X Notes
JUBILEE PLACE 7: DBRS Finalizes BB(high) Rating on Class E Notes
POLARIS PLC 2025-1: DBRS Finalizes BB(low) Rating on F Notes

SAGA PLC: S&P Withdraws 'B-' LongTerm Issuer Credit Rating
TOGETHER ASSET 2025-2ND1: DBRS Finalizes B(high) Rating on F Notes
TOGETHER ASSET 2025-CRE-1: S&P Assigns Prelim. B Rating on X Notes

                           - - - - -


=============
A U S T R I A
=============

SAPPI PAPIER: Fitch Rates New EUR300MM Unsec. Notes Due 2032 'BB+'
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Sappi Papier Holding GmbH's (SPH)
proposed new EUR300 million senior sustainability-linked notes due
2032 a rating of 'BB+' and Recovery Rating of 'RR4', in line with
the company's existing senior unsecured notes.

The proceeds will be used to refinance the remaining EUR240 million
principal amount of the 2026 senior notes, pay all fees related to
the offering, and fund approximately USD57 million cash on the
balance sheet to be used for general corporate purposes.

Fitch currently rates Sappi Limited's (Sappi) Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB+' with a Stable Outlook.

Key Rating Drivers

Limited Impact on Metrics: Fitch expects the transaction to have a
minor impact on leverage metrics, increasing EBITDA leverage by
approximately 0.1x within the Fitch forecast horizon of 2025-2028.
The refinancing will help spread out the company's debt maturity
profile, while the slightly higher funding costs will not
materially affect its cash flow metrics.

Cash Flow Temporarily Under Pressure: Sappi's capex has been
elevated in FY24 and FY25, largely due to the USD420 million
conversion and expansion of the Somer Set Mill Paper Machine No.2
(PM2) from graphic paper into packaging and specialty papers.
Additional restructuring costs, closure of two graphic paper mills,
business interruption expenses and damaged timber costs from fire
and snow in FY24 also pressured FCF. With capex and dividend
flexibility, Fitch expects the FCF margin to return to low single
digits. Failure to do so would put pressure on the rating.

Leverage to Peak in FY25: Fitch forecasts EBITDA gross leverage in
FY25 at 2.8x and net leverage at 2.6x from 2.7x and 2.3x in FY24,
respectively. This will be driven by flat EBITDA and negative FCF
eroding cash on the balance sheet. These leverage levels will
exceed its negative sensitivities of 2.5x and 2.0x. However, Fitch
forecasts Sappi will subsequently deleverage, returning to within
sensitivities from FY26.

FY24 EBITDA Better Than Expected: Fitch-adjusted EBITDA margin was
12% in FY24, which exceeded Fitch's and the company's forecasts.
This was led by the dissolving pulp segment, which continued to
have strong results in FY24, with rising prices due to tight supply
and high demand from viscose staple fibre. Graphic paper sales were
flat, although their profitability improved due to cost reductions
and mill closures. Packaging and specialty paper demand grew by 8%
as destocking reversed, with stronger recoveries in North America
and South Africa, but margins were eroded due to lower selling
prices.

Margins Under Pressure in FY25: Fitch forecasts the Fitch-adjusted
EBITDA margin to slightly decrease in FY25 before rising again in
FY26-FY28. EBITDA generation is sensitive to volatile pulp prices
and pressured by structurally declining demand for graphic paper.
Continued weaker demand in Europe, maintenance shutdowns, and
ramp-up of PM2 will weigh on margins in FY25. However, Fitch
expects margins to benefit from the new higher-margin packaging
capacity from PM2, and a falling contribution from the lower-margin
graphic paper in the medium term.

Transition Period: Sappi's transition is well underway, with the
conversion and expansion of PM2, which is set to be complete in
April 2025. Fitch views Sappi's strategy to limit exposure to
graphic paper as a required business adjustment, albeit at the cost
of temporarily weaker FCF and leverage. The strategy has involved
long-term investments and disposals, conversion to other packaging
grades, or closures of graphic paper machines, depending on market
conditions. Fitch views successful execution of the transition as a
key rating factor. FCF taking longer than expected to recover could
hinder deleveraging and lead to negative rating action.

Dividend and Capex Flexibility: Liquidity is comfortable, with
available revolving credit facilities (RCF) offsetting negative FCF
generation in FY25. Fitch continues to assume that Sappi has
flexibility to adjust its dividend payments, as it has done
historically, or revise capex, except for PM2-related capex, to
preserve cash.

Strong Diversification: Sappi's product portfolio is stronger and
typically broader than that of many packaging peers. Its raw
material and end-use offerings have broad applications across many
industries, including textiles, consumer goods, foodstuff,
pharmaceuticals, packaging, automobiles, dye sublimation paper and
magazines. This diversification is slightly offset by the cyclical
nature of the pulp and paper industries, declining demand for
graphic paper and variable consumer discretionary spending.

Instrument Notching: Fitch equalises SPH's senior unsecured debt
rating with Sappi's IDR. SPH issues debt to fund its non-South
African operations and is independently funded from Sappi Southern
Africa Limited (SSA). Fitch sees no material subordination of SPH's
debt to either unsecured debt issued by SSA or secured debt issued
within the Sappi group.

Peer Analysis

Sappi's closest Fitch-rated peers are pulp and paper packaging
producer Stora Enso Oyj (BBB-/Stable), Brazilian paper packaging
producer Klabin S.A. (BB+/Stable), and Italian premium paper
packaging and pressure-sensitive label producer Fedrigoni S.p.A.
(B+/Negative). The business profile also has some similarity to
that of pulp producers Suzano S.A. (BBB-/Positive) and Eldorado
Brasil Celulose S.A. (BB/Stable).

Sappi is better geographically diversified than its higher-rated
peer Stora, which is focused on Europe (70%). Sappi differentiates
more in terms of product offering with more end-use applications
relative to its peers. However, almost half of its revenue comes
from the structurally declining graphic paper segment, and volatile
pulp prices also weigh on profitability compared with its peers.
Fitch expects Sappi to further reduce its exposure to graphic
paper, although its progress is slower than Stora's, which aims to
almost eliminate paper revenue by end-2025.

Fitch expects Sappi's EBITDA margins in FY25-FY26 to be similar to
Stora's but lower than Fedrigoni. Pulp producers Suzano and
Eldorado have structurally different profitability profiles to
Sappi, with strong double-digit margins.

Sappi has strong leverage metrics for its rating, with forecast
EBITDA gross leverage peaking at 2.8x in FY25 before declining to
under 2x in FY27. This is lower than Stora's, which is above 3x. It
is also stronger than that of packaging peers in the 'BB' rating
category, such as Klabin, Silgan Holdings Inc. (BB+/Stable), and
Berry Global Group, Inc. (BB+/Rating Watch Positive).

Key Assumptions

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

- Revenue growth averaging around 7% per year from FY25-FY28 due to
higher selling prices in dissolving pulp and increased capacity in
packaging and specialty papers

- Product shift and fixed-cost reduction leading to EBITDA margin
steadily increasing from just under 11% in FY25 to above 13% in
FY28

- Dividend payments to continue, with flexibility supporting
positive FCF

- Capex to average 7% of revenue during FY25-FY28

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could Individually or Collectively Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

- EBITDA gross leverage above 2.5x and EBITDA net leverage above
2.0x

- EBITDA margin below 10%

- Neutral to positive FCF margin

- Shift in capital-allocation priorities toward debt-financed M&A
or shareholder returns, instead of deleveraging

- Greater volatility in margins due to unfavourable pulp and paper
prices, or a decline in graphic paper revenue not counterbalanced
by other packaging grades

Factors that Could Individually or Collectively Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

- EBITDA gross leverage below 2.0x and EBITDA net leverage below
1.5x on a sustained basis

- EBITDA margin above 14% on a sustained basis

- FCF margin above 2%

- Decreasing share of graphic paper revenue leading to improved
business risk and less volatile profitability

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Sappi had comfortable liquidity as of end-September 2024, with
USD208 million of cash available, adjusted by Fitch for intra-year
working capital changes of 2% of sales. Liquidity is also supported
by undrawn committed RCF of EUR515 million at SPH, maturing in
February 2027, and ZAR2 billion at SSA, maturing in August 2027.
Fitch forecasts that FCF will be pressured by higher capex and
dividend payments in FY25. However, from FY26, Fitch expects FCF to
turn positive once large capex projects are complete.

Sappi's refinancing risk is low due to strong leverage and coverage
ratios, broad access to capital markets, and an adequate debt
maturity profile spread across 2028 and 2032 for senior unsecured
notes once the 2026 senior notes are refinanced.

Issuer Profile

Sappi is a leading global provider of wood fibre-based raw
materials and end-use products. Sappi's operations span three
continents with eight production facilities in Western Europe, four
in North America and five in Southern Africa.

Date of Relevant Committee

February 25, 2025

MACROECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND SECTOR FORECASTS

Fitch's latest quarterly Global Corporates Macro and Sector
Forecasts data file which aggregates key data points used in its
credit analysis. Fitch's macroeconomic forecasts, commodity price
assumptions, default rate forecasts, sector key performance
indicators and sector-level forecasts are among the data items
included.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.


   Entity/Debt             Rating          Recovery   
   -----------             ------          --------   
Sappi Papier
Holding GmbH

   senior unsecured    LT BB+  New Rating    RR4




===========
F R A N C E
===========

SEQUANS COMMUNICATIONS: Names Dr. Qiuting Huang as CTO
------------------------------------------------------
Sequans Communications S.A. disclosed in a Form 6-K Report filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that it named Dr.
Qiuting Huang as its Chief Technology Officer.

Dr. Huang joined the Company upon its acquisition of ACP Advanced
Circuit Pursuit Ltd in January 2025, where he was CEO. Dr. Huang is
also an emeritus professor of the Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology (ETH) in Zurich, where he led pioneering research into
the design of RF integrated circuits in CMOS technology (RF CMOS)
and modem systems on a single chip (SoC) for cellular
communications, as well as state-of-the-art analogue and digital
integrated circuits for a variety of other applications, including
wireline, smart power and biomedical, mostly in collaboration with
industry.

Dr. Huang founded ACP, a fabless developer of RF transceivers and
SoCs for cellular communications, in 2001. He received his PhD
degree in 1987 from the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, is
a fellow of IEEE for contributions to integrated circuits for
communications and served for many years at the executive and
technical program committees of ISSCC and ESSCIRC.

                   About Sequans Communications

Colombes, France-based Sequans Communications S.A. is a fabless
semiconductor company that designs, develops, and markets
integrated circuits and modules for 4G and 5G cellular IoT
devices.

Paris-La Defense, France-based Ernst & Young Audit, the Company's
auditor since 2008, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated May 15, 2024, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations, has a working capital deficiency,
and has stated that substantial doubt exists about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.

Sequans Communications incurred net losses of $9 million and $41
million in 2022 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2023,
the Company had $109.2 million in total assets, $115.2 million in
total liabilities, and $6.1 million in total deficit.



=========
I T A L Y
=========

FEDRIGONI SPA: S&P Assigns 'B-' LongTerm ICR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned a 'B-' long-term issuer credit rating
to Italy-based paper and label producer Fedrigoni S.p.A.
(Fedrigoni) and a 'B-' issue rating to the existing EUR1.095
billion senior secured notes due 2030-2031. The recovery rating on
the notes remains '4'.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that
leverage will exceed 7x in the next twelve months, while liquidity
remains adequate. For 2025, we expect positive free operating cash
flow (FOCF) and funds from operations (FFO) cash interest coverage
above 1.5x.

"As a result of this reverse merger, Fiber Bidco SpA has been
dissolved and Fedrigoni is the new issuer of the senior secured
notes. We therefore withdrew our ratings on Fiber Bidco and
assigned ratings to Fedrigoni. We continue to rate the EUR1.095
billion senior secured notes due in 2030-2031, which were
transferred to Fedrigoni during the reverse merger. This
reorganization simplifies the group's legal structure and does not
affect our view of its credit quality.

"Fedrigoni's results last year were heavily impacted by prolonged
economic downturn in Europe. In 2024, we estimate Fedrigoni
generated revenues of about EUR1.85 billion. The implied revenue
growth of about 7% is mostly due to acquisitions in Asia and the
Americas, including Zuber and Arjowiggins China. Sales in Europe
(65% of revenues) were broadly flat. Despite this, adjusted EBITDA
margins will likely decrease to 12% in 2024 from 13.2% in 2023
because of inflationary cost increases, (i.e., pulp, logistics and
labor), which cannot be passed through. This, together with a
higher debt burden resulting from several sale-leaseback
transactions, caused adjusted leverage increase to about 9.8x in
2024 from 8.4x in 2023.

"Leverage will likely remain above 7x in 2025. We expect an EBITDA
improvement of EUR280 million-EUR300 million in 2025 from EUR221
million in 2024, largely due to acquisitions completed in
2023-2024, as well as non-European business growth. Yet, this will
not be sufficient to reduce leverage to 7x in our forecast, given
the elevated adjusted debt. Further leverage reduction in 2026 will
largely depend on Fedrigoni's ability to extract synergies from
acquired businesses and market demand improvement in Europe.

"Historic FOCF generation has been inconsistent. Over 2022-2024,
Fedrigoni's FOCF was only positive once, at EUR33 million in 2023.
EBITDA has been below our expectations and largely consumed by cash
interests and capital expenditure (capex). Fedrigoni will likely
report negative FOCF of EUR80 million in 2024 since S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA (EUR221 million) remains insufficient to
cover cash interests of EUR168 million, capex of EUR79 million (of
which EUR54 million relates to growth projects), and other cash
costs of EUR20 million-EUR30 million. In our base case, we forecast
minimal positive FOCF for 2025, driven by improved EBITDA and
reduced growth capex. However, there are downside risks to our
expectations, particularly from higher-than-expected working
capital outflows.

"Further debt-funded acquisitions could lead to a deterioration in
credit metrics. Over the last two years, the group has invested
about EUR200 million in acquisitions. Although our base case does
not assume any acquisitions in the next two years, we cannot rule
them out.

"The stable outlook indicates that in the next 12 months we expect
leverage above 7.0x, while liquidity will remain adequate. We
expect positive FOCF and FFO cash interest coverage above 1.5x in
2025."

S&P could lower the rating on Fedrigoni in the next 12 months if:

-- Covenant headroom tightened or liquidity deteriorated, leading
to a liquidity shortfall; or

-- Credit metrics -- including interest coverage and adjusted debt
to EBITDA -- weakened significantly, causing us to view the capital
structure as unsustainable.

A positive rating action is possible if Fedrigoni's sustained
improvement in EBITDA and prudent financial policy supported a
reduction in leverage toward 7.0x and robust FOCF generation, as
well as FFO cash interest coverage toward 2.0x.


INTESA SANPAOLO: Fitch Rates EUR500MM Sub. Tier 2 Bond 'BB+'
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Intesa Sanpaolo Assicurazioni S.p.A.'s
(ISPA) EUR500 million subordinated Tier 2 bond a 'BB+' rating. The
notes are rated two notches below ISPA's 'BBB' Issuer Default
Rating (IDR), comprising one notch each for 'below-average'
recovery prospects and 'moderate' non-performance risk, in line
with Fitch's notching criteria.

Key Rating Drivers

The subordinated notes have a maturity of 10 years and carry a
fixed coupon payable annually in arrears. The proceeds are being
used for general funding and regulatory capital purposes. The issue
ranks junior to senior notes and equally with senior subordinated
securities. This level of subordination results in Fitch's
'below-average' baseline recovery assumption for the issue.

The notes include a mandatory interest deferral feature, which
would be triggered if ISPA, whether at the standalone or the group
level, is not able to meet the applicable solvency capital
requirement. Under the agency's criteria, Fitch regards this
feature as leading to 'moderate' non-performance risk.

The notes qualify as Tier 2 regulatory capital under Solvency II
and are therefore treated as 100% capital in Fitch's Prism Global
Model. However, as they are a dated instrument, the notes are
treated as 100% debt in Fitch's financial leverage ratio (FLR)
calculation.

Fitch views the issue as slightly negative for ISPA's
capitalisation and slightly positive for its financial leverage and
fixed charge coverage due to the lower volume of the new Tier 2
notes compared with the EUR750 million grandfathered RT1 debt
instrument called in December 2024, which had received the same
treatment in Fitch's capital model and FLR calculation. Fitch
expects ISPA's capitalisation and leverage to remain strong and
commensurate with its ratings.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

The notes will be downgraded if ISPA's IDR is downgraded.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

The notes will be upgraded if ISPA's IDR is upgraded.

Date of Relevant Committee

Nov. 1, 2024

Public Ratings with Credit Linkage to other ratings

The rating is directly linked to the rating of ISPA.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt              Rating           
   -----------              ------           
Intesa Sanpaolo
Assicurazioni S.p.A.

   Subordinated         LT BB+  New Rating

MAIOR SPV: DBRS Cuts Class A Notes Rating to CC
-----------------------------------------------
DBRS Ratings GmbH downgraded its credit rating on the Class A notes
issued by Maior SPV S.r.l. (the Issuer) to CC (sf) from CCC (sf)
and removed the Negative trend on the credit rating.

The transaction represents the issuance of Class A, Class B, and
Class J notes (collectively, the notes). The credit rating on the
Class A notes addresses the timely payment of interest and the
ultimate payment of principal. Morningstar DBRS does not rate the
Class B or J notes.

At issuance, the notes were backed by a EUR 2.75 billion portfolio
by gross book value (GBV) consisting of secured and unsecured
Italian nonperforming loans originated by Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.
(formerly Unione di Banche Italiane S.p.A.) and IW Bank S.p.A.

The majority of loans in the portfolio defaulted between 2013 and
2017 and are in various stages of resolution. As of the cut-off
date, approximately 47% of the pool by GBV was secured. According
to the latest information provided by the servicer in December
2024, 37.9% of the pool by GBV was secured. At closing, the loan
pool mainly comprised corporate borrowers (approximately 83% by
GBV), which accounted for approximately 85.7% of the GBV as of
December 2024.

The receivables are serviced by Prelios Credit Servicing S.p.A.
(Prelios or the servicer) while Banca Finint S.p.A. (formerly
Securitization Services S.p.A.) has been appointed as back-up
servicer.

CREDIT RATING RATIONALE

The downgrade follows a review of the transaction and is based on
the following analytical considerations:

-- Transaction performance: An assessment of portfolio recoveries
as of December 2024, focusing on (1) a comparison between actual
collections and the servicer's initial business plan forecast; (2)
the collection performance observed over recent months; and (3) a
comparison between the current performance and Morningstar DBRS'
expectations.

-- Updated business plan: The servicer's updated business plan as
of June 2024, received in January 2025, and the comparison with the
initial collection expectations.

-- Portfolio characteristics: The loan pool composition as of
December 2024 and the evolution of its core features since
issuance.

-- Transaction liquidating structure: The order of priority
entails a fully sequential amortization of the notes (i.e., the
Class B notes will begin to amortize following the full repayment
of the Class A notes and the Class J notes will amortize following
the repayment of the Class B notes). Additionally, interest
payments on the Class B notes become subordinated to principal
payments on the Class A notes if the cumulative collection ratio or
present value cumulative profitability ratio is lower than 90%.
These triggers have been breached since the January 2022 interest
payment date (IPD), with the actual figures at 58.2% and 97.0%,
respectively, as of the January 2025 IPD according to the
servicer.

-- Liquidity support: The transaction benefits from an amortizing
cash reserve providing liquidity to the structure and covering
potential interest shortfall on the Class A notes and senior fees.
The cash reserve target amount is equal to 4.0% of the Class A
notes principal outstanding and is currently fully funded.

According to the latest investor report from January 2025, the
outstanding principal amounts of the Class A, Class B, and Class J
notes were EUR 243.0 million, EUR 60.0 million, and EUR 26.9
million, respectively. As of the January 2025 payment date, the
balance of the Class A notes had amortized by 61.3% since issuance
and the current aggregated transaction balance was EUR 329.9
million.

As of December 2024, the transaction was performing below the
servicer's business plan expectations. The actual cumulative gross
collections equaled EUR 573.2 million, whereas the servicer's
initial business plan estimated cumulative gross collections of EUR
936.4 million for the same period. Therefore, as of December 2024,
the transaction was underperforming by EUR 363.2 million (-38.8%)
compared with the initial business plan expectations.

At issuance, Morningstar DBRS estimated cumulative gross
collections for the same period of EUR 423.2 million at the BBB
(low) (sf) stressed scenario. Therefore, as of December 2024, the
transaction was performing above Morningstar DBRS' initial stressed
scenarios.

Pursuant to the requirements set out in the receivable servicing
agreement, in January 2025 the servicer delivered an updated
portfolio business plan. The updated portfolio business plan,
combined with the actual cumulative gross collections of EUR 542.0
million as of June 2024, resulted in a total of EUR 767.2 million,
which is 23.8% lower than the total gross disposition proceeds of
EUR 1.0 billion estimated in the initial business plan and is
expected to be realized over a longer period of time.

Excluding the actual collections, the servicer's expected future
collections from January 2025 amount to EUR 203.1 million.
Considering the senior costs, interest, and fees due on the notes,
the full repayment of Class A principal is increasingly unlikely,
but considering the transaction structure, a payment default on the
Notes would likely only occur a few years from now.

The final maturity date of the transaction is in July 2040.

Notes: All figures are in euros unless otherwise noted.




===================
L U X E M B O U R G
===================

ALTISOURCE PORTFOLIO: Credit Investments Holds 22.7% Equity Stake
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Credit Investments Group, a distinct business unit of UBS Asset
Management (Americas) LLC, disclosed in a Schedule 13D filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that as of February 19,
2025, it beneficially owns 19,739,088 shares of Altisource
Portfolio Solutions S.A.'s common stock, representing 22.7% of the
87,015,742 outstanding shares.

Credit Investments may be reached through:

     Peter C. Gyr
     UBS Asset Management (Americas) LLC
     787 Seventh Avenue
     New York, NY 10019
     Tel: 212-713-3123

A full-text copy of Credit Investments' SEC Report is available
at:

                 https://tinyurl.com/4zpwnr2s

                      About Altisource

Headquartered in Luxembourg, Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. --
https://www.Altisource.com/ -- is an integrated service provider
and marketplace for the real estate and mortgage industries.
Combining operational excellence with a suite of innovative
services and technologies, Altisource helps solve the demands of
the ever-changing markets it serves.

As of September 30, 2024, Altisource had $144.5 million in total
assets, $293.2 million in total liabilities, and $148.7 million in
total deficit.

                             *   *   *

In Feb. 2025, S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating
on Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. to 'SD' from 'CC' and its
issue rating on the senior secured term loan to 'D' from 'C'.

TARKETT PARTICIPATION: S&P Alters Outlook on B+ ICR to Positive
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook to positive from stable;
affirmed its 'B+' long-term issuer credit ratings on Tarkett
Participation, the group's issuing entity; and affirmed its 'B+'
issue ratings on its debt.

The positive outlook reflects a one-in-three likelihood of an
upgrade within the next 12 months if S&P anticipates that Tarkett
will maintain adjusted FFO to debt above 16%.

Tarkett's performance has improved, despite lower top-line growth
and a difficult sector outlook. The company's 2024 figures
indicated that organic sales shrank by 0.4% compared with 2023,
improving slightly to flat in the fourth quarter. In 2024, sales
were lower in all regions; however, the sports segment showed a
positive trend, with year-on-year sales growth of 2.4%. In our
view, Tarkett's diversification by geography and end-markets
bolsters the resilience of its overall top line. Tarkett has been
able to maintain its selling prices as the price of raw materials
fell, which led to a strongly favorable inflation balance of about
EUR34.5 million in 2024; this boosted its profitability. S&P said,
"We anticipate that the company will maintain selling prices in
2025 and beyond, so that the inflation balance is flat. Programs
introduced in 2024 to optimize the company's footprint and save
costs also reduced Tarkett's cost base. The company's net
productivity was EUR27.3 million in 2024 and we expect cost
optimization to continue in 2025. Overall, we forecast a S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margin of about 9.7%-9.9% in 2025."

S&P said, "We forecast that Tarkett will maintain adjusted FFO to
debt above 16% in 2025-2026 and that operating performance will
remain strong in 2025. Specifically, we anticipate that adjusted
EBITDA will increase to EUR340 million-EUR350 million in 2025 and
then to EUR355 million-EUR365 million in 2026. Much of this EBITDA
growth stems from contributions by Tarkett's acquisitions, and from
continued cost-efficiency measures. As a result, we forecast
adjusted FFO to debt at about 17.0%-19.0% in 2025 and 19.0%-21.0%
in 2026 (17.4% in 2024). Meanwhile, adjusted debt to EBITDA is
expected to gradually decrease to 3.0x-3.5x in 2027. Tarkett
reported strong free operating cash flow (FOCF) of EUR156 million
in 2024 and we predict FOCF will be EUR90 million-EUR110 million in
2025. This strong FOCF should translate to FOCF to debt of about
7.0%-9.0%. Much of the company's debt consists of a term loan B
(TLB) of EUR988 million. Our adjusted debt calculation includes
adjustments for leases, factoring, and pension liabilities, and
cash is netted off where relevant. In our base-case scenario, we
assume that the direct effect of any tariffs imposed by the U.S.
administration would be blunted by Tarkett's use of local
production facilities for many of the products sold in the U.S. We
will monitor the potential indirect effects, such as retaliation
measures from other regions, as well as whether the new trade
context creates a weaker global economic environment.

"We expect the recently announced public buy-out offer to have a
limited impact on our credit metrics. The offer is expected to be
finalized in May 2025 and would enable Tarkett Participation to
acquire the 9.65% stake that is currently free floating and not
controlled by Tarkett Participation. The offer will be followed by
a squeeze-out of minority shareholders. We assume it will lead to a
cash outflow of about EUR100 million, subject to the independent
expert confirming the fairness of the offer at EUR16 per share.
Given the elevated cash on Tarkett's balance sheet and its strong
cash flow generation, we do not expect the transaction to have a
material credit impact.

"We continue to assess Tarkett's liquidity as strong. At the end of
2024, the company had EUR268 million of accessible cash (excluding
cash in Russia and Argentina), and EUR350 million available under
its undrawn revolving credit facility (RCF). We factor in seasonal
working capital of about EUR100 million, and a cash outflow of
about EUR100 million linked to the public buy-out offer. In
addition, we assume acquisition spending of about EUR120
million-EUR130 million, of which EUR70 million will be used to
acquire two companies in the first quarter of 2025. Tarkett may use
the rest if an attractive opportunity arises. Its RCF is due in
2027, and the EUR988 million term loan B is due in 2028. The term
loan B is fully hedged until 2026, with an average rate of 0.6%.

"The positive outlook reflects our expectation that Tarkett's
segment diversification and the positive contribution from its
recently acquired bolt-on acquisitions will continue to support the
group's performance, despite difficult economic conditions. We
predict FFO to debt of 17%-19% and FOCF of about EUR90
million-EUR110 million in 2025.

"We could revise the outlook to stable, if we expected Tarkett's
FFO to debt to decline sustainably below 16%, while liquidity
remained sound."

S&P could raise the ratings within the next 12 months if:

-- FFO to debt was comfortably and sustainably above 16%;

-- FOCF to debt was sustainably above 5%; and

-- Liquidity remained sound.




=====================
N E T H E R L A N D S
=====================

STAMINA BIDCO: S&P Discontinues 'B+' ICR Upon Acquisition by Skio
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings discontinued its 'B+' issuer credit rating on
Stamina Bidco B.V. following a change of ownership related to the
Synthon group of operating subsidiaries. The same business
perimeter is now rated under a new holding company, Skio Bidco
B.V.

S&P will maintain its issue-level ratings on Stamina Bidco's
existing term loan B, until its repayment, as part of the
refinancing upon change of ownership. The outlook was stable at the
time of the discontinuance.





=========
S P A I N
=========

CAIXABANK RMBS 2: DBRS Confirms BB(high) Rating on B Notes
----------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Ratings GmbH confirmed and upgraded the credit ratings on the
notes issued by three CaixaBank RMBS transactions as follows:


CaixaBank RMBS 1, FT (CB1)

-- Class A Notes confirmed at AA (sf)
-- Class B Notes confirmed at A (low) (sf)


CaixaBank RMBS 2, FT (CB2)

-- Class A Notes confirmed at AA (sf)
-- Class B Notes confirmed at BB (high) (sf)


CaixaBank RMBS 3, FT (CB3)

-- Series A Notes confirmed at AA (sf)
-- Series B Notes upgraded to B (low) (sf) from CC (sf)

The credit ratings on the Class A Notes address the timely payment
of interest and the ultimate repayment of principal on or before
the legal final maturity date of each transaction. The credit
ratings on the Class B Notes address the ultimate payment of
interest and principal on or before the legal final maturity date
of each transaction.

CREDIT RATING RATIONALE

The credit rating actions follow an annual review of the
transactions and are based on the following analytical
considerations:

-- Portfolio performances, in terms of delinquencies, defaults,
and losses, as of the December 2024 and January 2025 payment dates

-- Portfolio default rate (PD), loss given default (LGD), and
expected loss assumptions on the outstanding collateral pools, and

-- The current available credit enhancement to the rated notes to
cover the expected losses assumed at their respective credit rating
levels.

All three transactions are securitizations of first-lien
residential mortgage loans and first-lien multi-credito (drawn
credit lines) mortgages on properties in Spain originated and
serviced by CaixaBank, S.A. (CaixaBank), that closed in February
2016 (CB1), March 2017 (CB2), and December 2017 (CB3).

PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE

CB1: As of December 2024, loans more than 90 days in arrears
increased to 2.0% of the outstanding performing portfolio
collateral balance, up 1.6% at the previous annual review. The
cumulative default ratio increased to 1.7% of the original
portfolio balance from 1.6% in the same period.

CB2: As of January 2025, loans more than 90 days in arrears
remained at 2.1% of the outstanding performing portfolio collateral
balance. The cumulative default ratio increased to 1.7% of the
original portfolio balance from 1.5% at the previous annual
review.

CB3: As of December 2024, loans more than 90 days in arrears
increased to 3.6% of the outstanding performing portfolio
collateral balance, up from 3.1% at the previous annual review. The
cumulative default ratio increased to 1.6% of the original
portfolio balance from 1.3% in the same period.

PORTFOLIO ASUMPTIONS AND KEY DRIVERS

Morningstar DBRS conducted a loan-by-loan analysis on the remaining
receivables, considering updated multi-credito balances, and
updated its base case PD and LGD assumptions as follows:

-- CB1: 1.8% and 10.9%, respectively.
-- CB2: 1.9% and 10.0%, respectively.
-- CB3: 3.7% and 25.0%, respectively.

CREDIT ENHANCEMENT

CB1: as of the December 2024 payment date, credit enhancement to
the Class A Notes was 30.8%, up from 26.6% one year ago.
CB2: as of the January 2025 payment date, credit enhancement to the
Class A Notes was 26.7%, up from 24.4% one year ago.
CB3: as of the December 2024 payment date, credit enhancement to
the Class A Notes was 25.9%, up from 23.1% one year ago.

All three transactions benefit from the reserve funds, which were
funded at respective closing dates from the proceeds from
subordinated loans provided by Caixabank. The reserve funds in all
three transactions are available to cover senior fees and expenses
and all interest and principal amounts due on the respective Class
A Notes. Following the full repayment of the Class A Notes, the
reserve funds will also cover interest and principal payments on
the Class B Notes. Any amortized amounts will be released outside
of the Priority of Payments and used to repay the subordinated
loans used to fund the reserve funds.

CB1: the amortizing reserve fund is currently at its target level
of EUR 568.0 million, which is the minimum of 8.0% of the
outstanding balance of the rated notes and 4.0% of their initial
balance, subject to a floor of 2.0% of that initial balance. The
reserve fund is currently not amortizing due to an amortization
criterion not being met.

CB2: the reserve fund is currently amortizing and is at its target
level of EUR 82.1 million, which is the minimum of 6.0% of the
outstanding balance of the rated notes and 4.75% of their initial
balance.
CB3: the reserve fund is currently amortizing and is at its target
level of EUR 48.4 million, which is the 4.0% of the outstanding
balance of the rated notes.

CaixaBank acts as the account bank for all three Issuers. Based on
the account bank reference rating of AA (low) (sf) on CaixaBank,
which is one notch below its Morningstar DBRS Long-Term Critical
Obligations Rating of AA, the downgrade provisions outlined in the
transaction documents, and other mitigating factors inherent in the
transaction structures, Morningstar DBRS considers the risk arising
from the exposure to the account bank to be consistent with the
credit ratings assigned to the notes, as described in Morningstar
DBRS' "Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions"
methodology.

Notes: All figures are in euros unless otherwise noted.




===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

CARCO PRP: S&P Assigns Prelim. 'B' LongTerm ICR on Refinancing
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned a preliminary 'B' long-term issuer
credit rating to Carco PRP Ltd. (Carco) and a preliminary 'B' issue
rating to the proposed EUR365 million senior secured term loan B
(TLB), with a preliminary recovery rating of '3' and 55% recovery
prospects.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectations that Carco's debt to
EBITDA will decrease to below 5x in 2026 on EBITDA expansion, its
free operating cash flow (FOCF) will remain consistently positive,
and its funds from operations (FFO) cash interest coverage will
remain sustainably above 2.0x.

S&P said, "We assigned a preliminary rating of 'B' to Carco based
on our expectation that its leverage will decrease to below 5.0x in
2026 thanks to a resilient margin profile.   Carco plans to enter
into a EUR365 million senior secured TLB, the proceeds of which (in
addition to the utilization of EUR10 million cash) it will use to
refinance EUR143 million of outstanding debt, cover EUR22 million
transaction fees, and finance the EUR211 million ($220 million
equivalent) acquisition of KRS. When incorporating a full 12-month
pro forma contribution from KRS, we forecast Carco's revenue will
approach EUR300 million in 2025, compared with an estimated EUR184
million for fiscal year 2024 (+61% annual growth, of which +5% is
organic for Carco).

"In addition, we expect an S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA
margin of 26.7% when excluding about EUR8 million in one-off
transaction costs allocated to EBITDA (versus 28.1% in 2024). This
will translate into S&P Global Ratings-adjusted gross leverage of
5.3x at year-end 2025 (4.8x excluding EUR8 million one-off
transaction costs), which we expect to reduce to 4.5x in 2026 on
business expansion and improving profitability at KRS."

Following the transaction, Carco will significantly increase its
presence in the growing A&D industry.   KRS, a U.S.-based carve-out
from the Swedish industrial company AB SKF (not rated), specializes
in manufacturing rings and seals primarily for aerospace engine
manufacturers (81% of September 2024 last-12-month sales) and
energy applications (14%). It generated about EUR71 million revenue
in 2024 based on due diligence data, and S&P estimates S&P Global
Ratings-reported EBITDA of EUR12.4 million, implying a 17.5% EBITDA
margin.

S&P believes this acquisition will strengthen Carco's
diversification by expanding its product portfolio -- adding carbon
seals and metal rings -- and improve its end-market balance. Carco
will increase its position in the growing A&D sector, which will
become one of Carco's largest revenue contributors (23% of
pro-forma September 2024 last-12-month sales), along with
industrial (26%) and energy (23%), followed by semiconductors
(13%), automotive (6%), and others.

Additionally, like other A&D suppliers, about 85% of KRS' revenue
is backed by long-term agreements (LTAs), and this should
significantly enhance Carco's revenue visibility, which currently
lacks a substantial backlog due to its short-cycle business model.
At the same time, KRS mainly relies on one commercial aviation
platform and one defence platform, which are both developed by a
primary manufacturer of aerospace engines, accounting for more than
65% of its revenues.

S&P anticipates strong underlying market conditions for the A&D
industry.   Airbus and Boeing are ramping up production rates, with
large commercial aircraft engine demand following suit, and we
believe KRS stands to benefit, given its exposure to narrowbody
engine platforms. In addition, global risks and regional conflicts
may motivate stronger military and defense spending, providing
tailwinds to Carco's defense business.

Additionally, at the beginning of 2024, the company renegotiated
one of its most important contracts in the A&D business, to include
higher prices and automatic pass-through clauses for inflation,
which is expected to have a full run-rate impact on both KRS'
revenue and profitability in 2025.

The integration of KRS caters some execution risk, but S&P
anticipates the company's appetite for large mergers and
acquisitions (M&A) will pause over the next couple of years.   The
acquisition of KRS marks Carco's tenth M&A transaction since Andrea
Chalp, CEO, and Bruno Lorenzi, Managing Director became majority
shareholder and minority shareholder, respectively, in 2015, when
Carco's revenues were just EUR15 million. However, the acquisition
of KRS will stand out in terms of size, as it will be the largest
M&A transaction in Carco's history.

Carco aims to establish KRS as a fully independent entity from SKF
within 12 months of closing. At the same time, the acquisition is
subject to some execution risks or potential setbacks related to IT
integration, operational continuity, and possible unforeseen
complexities in disentangling legacy processes from its former
parent company, which ultimately can alter current base case should
these arise. However, S&P understands that the IT separation is
nearing completion.

S&P said, "In addition to inorganic growth, we anticipate Carco's
organic evolution will be supported by positive growth in the
semiconductor sector and renewable energy applications, offsetting
lackluster industrial demand. In the semiconductor end market,
where Carco specializes in ultra-high purity sealing systems, we
anticipate modest growth supported by the AI infrastructure
expansion, while rising electricity consumption should drive
investments in energy infrastructure and renewables, supporting
Carco's elastomeric and high-performance plastic seals business.
These growing markets, along with the expansion into the A&D
industry, should offset the subdued demand from industrial clients,
where we still see a generally weak market environment. Overall,
this should translate into revenue expanding to about EUR296
million in 2025 (+61.5%), when accounting for the 12-month pro
forma effect of KRS, (EUR184 million in 2024), and EUR305 million
in 2026 (+2.9%)."

Carco's small size and narrow product offer is balanced by its high
profitability of 26%-28% for 2024-2026 (excluding one-off costs for
2025) on a S&P Global ratings adjusted basis.   With estimated
revenue of about EUR296 million in 2025, the company has a
relatively limited scale compared with other capital goods
companies S&P rates. In addition, S&P believes the commoditization
of its products and its presence in a highly fragmented industry
makes the company potentially vulnerable to long-term substitution
risk.

At the same time, S&P positively note Carco retains a strong
relationship with its key clients and benefits from an efficient
cost pass-through mechanism, supported by the mission-critical
nature of its components and its portfolio of proprietary patents
and designs. In addition, we note the company's ability to execute
customized solutions, even in small batches, provides some
differentiation from larger, less agile players and smaller
competitors with limited capacity. These factors contribute to its
above-average profitability, with an estimated S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margin of 28.1% in 2024, compared with
28.6% in 2023 and 39% in 2022; however, the higher profitability
before 2023 was based on a different perimeter and before the
dilutive acquisitions performed during 2023 of Polis, ROS, and
Novotema.

S&P expects Carco's profitability to remain high despite
transaction costs in 2025 and initial dilution from the KRS
acquisition.   Carco's stand-alone reported EBITDA margin should
stay resilient at 28%-29% in 2025-2026 (28.1% estimate for 2024),
supported by its efficient cost pass-through, the mission-critical
nature of its products, and a portfolio of proprietary patents and
designs.

KRS, according to S&P's estimate, recorded an International
Financial Reporting Standards-reported EBITDA margin averaging a
relatively low 10% between 2021 and 2023. This was due to cost
inflation and the company's inability to pass those costs through
during this period, given the fixed-term conditions in its LTAs. In
2024, thanks to contract renegotiation, the company significantly
improved its reported EBITDA margin to 17.5%. However, the full
run-rate effect will only be visible in 2025, which, along with
productivity gains from new machinery installed in late 2024,
should drive margin recovery to 23%-24% in 2025-2026.

All in all, under S&P's base case S&P anticipates an S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margin of 24.1% in 2025 (28.1% in 2024),
albeit impacted by one-off transaction costs and separation costs
and KRS' initial dilutive effects. With temporary costs fading and
KRS' profitability improving, its S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
EBITDA margin for based on the new perimeter should recover to
about 27.5% in 2026.

S&P expects Carco's FOCF to stabilize at EUR30 million annually
from 2026, though working capital management at KRS could present
unforeseen challenges.   Between 2021 and 2024, Carco generated a
cumulative EUR63 million in S&P Global Ratings-adjusted FOCF,
averaging about 14% of sales. Positive FOCF was mostly driven by
Carco's high-margin profile, relatively low interest expenses, and
stable capital expenditure (capex) needs at about 4% of sales,
though it peaked at 6% of revenues in 2024 due to investments in
increasing production capacity and the acquisition of production
facilities.

Carco's stand-alone trade working capital requirements are
approximately 30% of sales, relatively higher compared with peers,
and historically resulting in annual working capital cash needs of
EUR2 million-EUR8 million. Post-acquisition, while S&P expects
profitability to remain strong and capex to be 3%-4% of sales, S&P
believes working capital dynamics will become a key determinant of
FOCF generation, as KRS currently operates with a high working
capital-to-revenue ratio of about 60%, also due to high inventory.

S&P said, "While we expect some normalization as safety stock
levels decrease, business expansion will still drive a working
capital cash outflow for both Carco and KRS that we estimate will
be a cumulative EUR15 million-EUR20 million between 2025 and 2026.

"For 2025-2026, we expect Carco to prioritize executing its
business plan, integrating KRS, harnessing the synergies it has
identified, and deleveraging.   We understand the company intends
to deleverage until reaching company-adjusted net debt to EBITDA of
3.0x, and we therefore do not expect to see significant
transformative acquisitions. However, given its aggressive and
accelerated buy-and-build strategy over the past decade, we believe
Carco may still pursue opportunistic bolt-on acquisitions.

"The final rating will depend on our receipt and satisfactory
review of all final transaction documentation.    Accordingly, the
preliminary rating should not be construed as evidence of a final
rating. If we do not receive the final documentation within a
reasonable time frame or if the final documentation departs from
the materials reviewed, we reserve the right to withdraw or revise
our preliminary rating. Potential changes include the size of the
term loan and the RCF, the utilization of the proceeds, maturity,
conditions of the financing, financial and other covenants,
security, and ranking.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectations that Carco's debt to
EBITDA will decrease to below 5x in 2026 thanks to EBITDA
expansion, that FOCF will remain consistently positive, and that
its FFO cash interest coverage will remain sustainably above
2.0x."

S&P could lower the preliminary rating if:

-- Carco sustains debt to EBITDA above 5.5x due to
weaker-than-expected operating performance or it adopts aggressive
financial policy with unanticipated material debt-funded
acquisitions or dividend distributions;

-- It sustains negative FOCF; or

-- FFO cash interest coverage falls below 2.0x.

An upgrade appears unlikely at this stage due to Carco's limited
scale compared with higher-rated peers, as well as the execution
risks associated with its ongoing transformative acquisition.
However, S&P could consider raising the rating if the company
establishes a consistent track record of lower leverage translating
into debt to EBITDA approaching and remaining below 4.0x and its
FFO cash interest coverage sustainably exceeds 3.0x.

Governance factors are a moderately negative consideration in our
credit rating analysis of Carco, primarily due to S&P' view that
the group is privately held, and its decision making is mainly
linked to a few key persons.

Environmental and social factors are an overall neutral
consideration. On the positive side, the company plans to publish
its first Sustainability Report based on 2025 results, enhancing
transparency, and it is exposed to clients that are benefitting
from the energy transition, such as wind turbine manufacturers. At
the same time, about 25% of its pro forma revenues come from the
carbon emission-intensive A&D industry.


CASTELL PLC 2023-1: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Rating on Class F Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised to 'AA+ (sf)' from 'AA (sf)', to 'AA
(sf)' from 'A (sf)', to 'A- (sf)' from 'BBB (sf)', and to 'BBB
(sf)' from 'BB+ (sf)' its credit ratings on Castell 2023-1 PLC's
class B-Dfrd, C-Dfrd, D-Dfrd, and E-Dfrd notes, respectively.  At
the same time, S&P affirmed its 'AAA (sf)' and 'BB- (sf)' ratings
on the class A and F-Dfrd notes.

The upgrades reflect that while arrears performance has
deteriorated since S&P's previous review, credit enhancement for
the class B-Dfrd to E-Dfrd notes has increased significantly due to
prepayments and the transaction's sequential amortization.
Loan-level arrears stand at 6.9%, up from 3.8% at S&P's previous
review. Arrears of greater than or equal to 90 days currently stand
at 4.3%, up from 2.1% at the previous review.

The one-month annualized constant prepayment rate has averaged
18.8% since S&P's previous review, and, on average, has been in
line with our U.K. prime index over the last six months.
Prepayments have increased credit enhancement for the class A to
F-Dfrd notes, offsetting the increased arrears.

The liquidity reserve fund remains at its target as it has since
closing, and all losses have been cleared via excess spread.

Overall, since our previous review, S&P's weighted-average
foreclosure frequency assumptions have increased at all rating
levels due to the higher loan-level arrears.

On the other hand, the lower current loan-to-value ratio led to a
slight reduction to S&P's weighted-average loss severity
assumptions.

  Table 1

  Portfolio WAFF and WALS

                                              Base foreclosure
                                       frequency component for
                                              an archetypical
  Rating                        Credit        U.K. mortgage
  Level    WAFF (%)   WALS (%)  coverage (%)  loan pool (%)

  AAA      27.88      86.81     24.20         12.00
  AA       20.62      81.21     16.74          8.00
  A        16.79      69.12     11.60          6.00
  BBB      13.08      59.27      7.75          4.00
  BB        9.17      51.08      4.69          2.00
  B         8.28      42.72      3.54          1.50

  WAFF--Weighted-average foreclosure frequency.
  WALS--Weighted-average loss severity.

S&P said, "We affirmed our 'AAA (sf)' rating on the class A notes.
Our credit and cash flow results indicate that the available credit
enhancement continues to be commensurate with the assigned rating.

"The rating on the class B-Dfrd notes is below the rating indicated
by our cash flow analysis. Our rating on these notes addresses
payment of ultimate interest and principal, and interest can defer
on these notes when they are not the most senior class outstanding.
The presence of interest deferral mechanisms is, in our view,
inconsistent with the definition of a 'AAA' rating. We therefore
limited our upgrade to a 'AA+ (sf)' rating.

"Our ratings on the class C-Dfrd, D-Dfrd, E-Dfrd, and F-Dfrd notes
are in line with our sensitivity runs considering higher defaults.
The ratings reflect the negative arrears trend since the previous
review and these notes' position in the capital structure. We
raised our ratings on the class C-Dfrd, D-Dfrd, and E-Dfrd notes
and affirmed our rating on the F-Dfrd notes."

Macroeconomic forecasts and forward-looking analysis

S&P said, "We expect U.K. inflation to remain above the Bank of
England's 2% target in 2025, even though inflation has been moving
back toward the target quicker than expected. The year-on-year
change in house prices in Q4 2024 in the U.K. was 3.5%. Although
high inflation is overall credit negative for all borrowers,
inevitably some borrowers will be more negatively affected than
others, and to the extent inflationary pressures materialize more
quickly or more severely than currently expected, risks may
emerge.

"Given our current macroeconomic forecasts and forward-looking view
of the U.K. residential mortgage market, we have performed
sensitivities related to higher levels of defaults due to increased
arrears and extended recovery timing due to observed delays to
repossession owning to court backlogs in the U.K. and the
repossession grace period announced by the U.K. government under
the Mortgage Charter." The notes remained robust to these
sensitivities.

The transaction is backed by a pool of second-lien owner-occupied
mortgage loans secured on properties in England, Scotland, and
Wales.


DILOSK RMBS 8: DBRS Confirms B(high) Rating on Class X Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Ratings GmbH confirmed the following credit ratings on the
notes issued by Dilosk RMBS No. 8 (STS) DAC (the Issuer):

-- Class A notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class B notes at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class C notes at A (high) (sf)
-- Class D notes at A (low) (sf)
-- Class E notes at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class F notes at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class X notes at B (high) (sf)

The credit rating on the Class A notes addresses the timely payment
of interest and ultimate payment of principal on or before the
legal final maturity date in May 2062. The credit rating on the
Class B notes addresses the ultimate payment of interest and
principal, and timely payment of interest while the senior-most
class outstanding. The credit ratings on the Class C, Class D,
Class E, Class F, and Class X notes address the ultimate payment of
interest and principal on or before the legal final maturity date.

CREDIT RATING RATIONALE

The credit rating confirmations follow an annual review of the
transaction and are based on the following analytical
considerations:

-- Portfolio performance, in terms of delinquencies, defaults and
losses.

-- Portfolio default rate (PD), loss given default (LGD) and
expected loss assumptions on the remaining receivables.

-- Current available credit enhancement to the notes to cover the
expected losses at their respective credit rating levels.

The transaction is a securitization of prime owner-occupied
mortgage loans secured over properties in the Republic of Ireland
and originated by Dilosk DAC. The portfolio is serviced by Dilosk
DAC, with BCMGlobal ASI Limited acting as the delegated servicer.

PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE

As of November 2024, loans one to two months in arrears represented
0.2% of the outstanding portfolio balance, and there were no loans
in later-stage arrears.

PORTFOLIO ASSUMPTIONS AND KEY DRIVERS

Morningstar DBRS conducted a loan-by-loan analysis of the remaining
pool of receivables and updated its base-case PD and LGD
assumptions at the B (sf) credit rating level to 1.2% and 10.8%,
respectively.

CREDIT ENHANCEMENT

As of the November 2024 payment date, the credit enhancement
available to the Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, and
Class F notes was 8.7%, 6.0%, 3.9%, 2.5%, 2.0%, and 1.4%,
respectively, up from 8.1%, 5.6%, 3.6%, 2.3%, 1.8% and 1.3%,
respectively, at Morningstar DBRS' initial credit rating. Credit
enhancement to the notes is provided by subordination of junior
classes and the general reserve fund.

The general reserve fund is currently at its target level of EUR
0.4 million, equal to 0.75% of the original principal balance of
the Class A to Class F notes and the Class Z1 notes, minus the
liquidity reserve target amount. The general reserve fund is
available to cover senior fees, interest, and principal (via the
principal deficiency ledgers) on the Class A to Class F notes.

The liquidity reserve fund is currently at its target level of EUR
2.7 million, equal to 0.75% of the outstanding principal balance of
the Class A notes and is available to cover senior fees and
interest on the Class A notes.

Barclays Bank PLC acts as the account bank for the transaction.
Based on the account bank reference rating of Barclays Bank PLC at
A (high) - being one notch below the Morningstar DBRS public
Long-Term Critical Obligations Rating of AA (low), the downgrade
provisions outlined in the transaction documents, and other
mitigating factors inherent in the transaction structure,
Morningstar DBRS considers the risk arising from the exposure to
the account bank to be consistent with the credit rating assigned
to the Class A notes, as described in Morningstar DBRS' "Legal and
Derivative Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions"
methodology.

Natixis S.A. acts as the swap counterparty for the transaction.
Morningstar DBRS' private credit rating on Natixis S.A. is above
the First Rating Threshold as described in Morningstar DBRS' "Legal
and Derivative Criteria for European Structured Finance
Transactions" methodology.

Notes: All figures are in euros unless otherwise noted.


JUBILEE PLACE 7: DBRS Finalizes BB(high) Rating on Class E Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Ratings GmbH finalized its provisional credit ratings on the
residential mortgage-backed notes issued by Jubilee Place 7 B.V.
(the Issuer) as follows:

-- Class A notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class B notes at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class C notes at A (high) (sf)
-- Class D notes at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class E notes at BB (high) (sf)
-- Class X1 notes at A (high) (sf)

The finalized credit ratings on the Class E and Class X1 Notes are
three notches higher than the provisional credit ratings
Morningstar DBRS initially assigned. The effect of the overall
lower margins of the Notes improved the cash flow analysis on the
Class E and Class X1 Notes in their respective credit rating stress
scenarios.

The credit rating on the Class A notes addresses the timely payment
of interest and the ultimate repayment of principal by the legal
final maturity date in September 2062. The credit rating on the
Class B notes addresses the timely payment of interest when most
senior and the ultimate payment of principal by the legal final
maturity date. The credit ratings on the Class C, Class D, Class E
and Class X1 notes address the ultimate payment of interest and
principal by the legal final maturity date.

Morningstar DBRS does not rate the Class F, Class S1, Class S2,
Class X2, or Class R notes also issued in this transaction.

CREDIT RATING RATIONALE

Jubilee Place 7 B.V. is a bankruptcy-remote special-purpose vehicle
incorporated in the Netherlands. The Issuer used the proceeds from
the notes to fund the purchase of Dutch mortgage receivables
originated by Dutch Mortgage Services B.V., DNL 1 B.V., and
Community Hypotheken B.V. (the originators), which was acquired
from Citibank, N.A., London Branch (Citibank; the seller).

The originators are specialized residential buy-to-let (BTL) real
estate lenders operating in the Netherlands and started their
lending businesses in 2019. They operate under the mandate of
Citibank, which defines most of the underwriting criteria and
policies.

As of November 30, 2024, the portfolio consisted of 687 loans with
a total portfolio balance of approximately EUR 299.4 million. The
weighted-average (WA) seasoning of the portfolio is 0.7 years with
a WA remaining term of 32.1 years. The WA current loan-to-value
ratio of 68.3% is in line with that of other Dutch BTL residential
mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) transactions. The loan parts in
the portfolio are either interest-only loans (96.8%) or repayment
mortgage loans (3.2%). Most of the loans were granted for the
purpose of remortgage (78.8%). 99% of the loans in the portfolio
are fixed with a compulsory future switch to floating, while the
notes pay a floating rate. To address this interest rate mismatch,
the transaction is structured with a fixed-to-floating interest
rate swap where the Issuer pays a fixed rate and receives
three-month Euribor over a notional, which is a defined
amortization schedule. There are no loans in arrears in the
portfolio.

Morningstar DBRS calculated the credit enhancement for the Class A
notes at 10.49%, which is provided by the subordination of the
Class B to Class F notes and the liquidity reserve fund. Credit
enhancement for the Class B notes is 5.49% and is provided by the
subordination of the Class C to Class F notes and the liquidity
reserve fund. Credit enhancement for the Class C notes is 3.24% and
is provided by the subordination of the Class D to Class F notes
and the liquidity reserve fund. Credit enhancement for the Class D
notes is 1.24% and is provided by the subordination of the Class E
and Class F notes and the liquidity reserve fund. Credit
enhancement for the Class E notes is 0.54% and is provided by the
subordination of the Class F notes and the liquidity reserve fund.

The transaction benefits from an amortizing liquidity reserve fund
(LRF) that the Issuer can use to cover shortfalls on senior
expenses and interest payments on the Class A notes and Class B
notes once most senior. The LRF was partially funded at closing at
0.25% of (100/95) of the initial balance of the Class A and Class B
notes and will build up until it reaches its target of 1.25%
(100/95) of the outstanding balance of the Class A and Class B
notes. The LRF is floored at 0.25% (100/95) of the initial balance
of the Class A and Class B notes until the first optional
redemption date. The LRF indirectly provides credit enhancement for
all classes of notes, as released amounts will be part of the
principal available funds.

Additionally, the notes have liquidity support from principal
receipts, which can be used to cover senior expenses and interest
shortfalls on the Class A notes or the most senior class of notes
outstanding once the Class A notes have fully amortized.

The Issuer entered into a fixed-to-floating swap with Citibank
Europe plc (rated AA (low) with a Stable trend by Morningstar DBRS)
to mitigate the fixed interest rate risk from the mortgage loans
and the three-month Euribor payable on the loan and the notes. The
notional of the swap is a pre-defined amortization schedule of the
assets. The Issuer pays a fixed swap rate and receives three-month
Euribor in return. The swap documents are in line with Morningstar
DBRS' "Legal and Derivative Criteria for European Structured
Finance Transactions" methodology.

The Issuer Account Bank is Citibank Europe plc, Netherlands Branch.
Based on Morningstar DBRS' private credit rating on the Account
Bank, the downgrade provisions outlined in the transaction
documents, and structural mitigants inherent in the transaction
structure, Morningstar DBRS considers the risk arising from the
exposure to the account bank to be consistent with the credit
ratings assigned to the notes, as described in Morningstar DBRS'
"Legal and Derivative Criteria for European Structured Finance
Transactions" methodology.

Morningstar DBRS based its credit ratings primarily on the
following considerations:

-- The transaction capital structure, including the form and
sufficiency of available credit enhancement and liquidity
provisions.

-- The credit quality of the mortgage loan portfolio and the
ability of the servicer to perform collection activities.
Morningstar DBRS calculated portfolio default rates (PDs), loss
given default (LGD), and expected loss (EL) outputs on the mortgage
loan portfolio.

-- The ability of the transaction to withstand stressed cash flow
assumptions and repay the notes according to the terms of the
transaction documents. Morningstar DBRS analyzed the transaction
cash flows using the PD and LGD outputs provided by its European
RMBS Insight Model. Morningstar DBRS analyzed transaction cash
flows using Intex DealMaker.

-- The structural mitigants in place to avoid potential payment
disruptions caused by operational risk and the replacement language
in the transaction documents.

-- The consistency of the transaction's legal structure with
Morningstar DBRS' "Legal and Derivative Criteria for European
Structured Finance Transactions" methodology and the presence of
legal opinions addressing the assignment of the assets to the
Issuer.

Notes: All figures are in euros unless otherwise noted.


POLARIS PLC 2025-1: DBRS Finalizes BB(low) Rating on F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Ratings Limited finalized its provisional credit ratings on
the residential mortgage-backed notes to be issued by Polaris
2025-1 PLC (Polaris 2025 or the Issuer) as follows:

-- Class A notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class B notes at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class C notes at A (high) (sf)
-- Class D notes at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class E notes at BB (high) (sf)
-- Class F notes at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class X notes at BB (high) (sf)

The finalized provisional credit ratings on the Class D to Class F
notes are higher than the provisional credit ratings Morningstar
DBRS assigned because of the lower cost of funding in the
transaction after the rated notes priced.

The credit rating on the Class A notes addresses the timely payment
of interest and the ultimate repayment of principal on or before
the final maturity date in February 2068. The credit ratings on the
Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, Class F, and Class X notes
address the timely payment of interest once they are the
senior-most class of notes outstanding and until then the ultimate
payment of interest and the ultimate repayment of principal on or
before the final maturity date.

Morningstar DBRS does not rate the Class Z notes or the residual
certificates also issued in this transaction.

CREDIT RATING RATIONALE

The Issuer is a bankruptcy-remote special-purpose vehicle
incorporated in England and Wales. The notes issued funded the
purchase of residential assets originated by UK Mortgage Lending
Ltd (UKML). On or prior to the issue date, the seller, UK
Residential Mortgages Limited (UKRL), acquired the beneficial title
from UKML. Both are wholly owned by Pepper Money (PMB) Limited
(Pepper Money). Pepper (UK) Limited (Pepper) is the appointed
servicer to the transaction. Pepper Money and Pepper are part of
the Pepper Group Limited (Pepper Group), a worldwide consumer
finance business, third-party loan servicer, and asset manager. CSC
Capital Markets UK Limited acts as the back-up servicer facilitator
to the transaction.

The mortgage portfolio consists of GBP 549 million in first-lien
owner-occupied (OO) mortgages secured by properties in the UK.

The Issuer issued seven tranches of collateralized mortgage-backed
securities (the Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, Class
F, and Class Z notes) to finance the purchase of the portfolio.
Additionally, the Issuer issued one class of noncollateralized
notes (the Class X notes).

The transaction is structured to initially provide 14.5% of credit
enhancement to the Class A notes. This includes subordination of
the Class B to the Class Z notes.

The transaction features a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap,
given that the majority of the pool is composed of fixed-rate loans
with a compulsory reversion to floating in the future. The
liabilities pay a coupon linked to the daily compounded Sterling
Overnight Index Average. Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment
Bank (Crédit Agricole CIB) is the swap counterparty as of closing.
Based on Morningstar DBRS' private credit rating on Crédit
Agricole CIB, the downgrade provisions outlined in the documents,
and the transaction structural mitigants, Morningstar DBRS
considers the risk arising from the exposure to the swap
counterparty to be consistent with the credit ratings assigned to
the rated notes as described in Morningstar DBRS' "Legal and
Derivative Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions"
methodology.

HSBC Bank plc, privately rated by Morningstar DBRS, acts as the
Issuer Account Bank in the transaction and holds the Issuer's
transaction account, the liquidity reserve fund (LRF), and the swap
collateral account, while Barclays Bank PLC was appointed as the
collection account bank. Morningstar DBRS has a Long Term Critical
Obligations Rating of AA (low) and a Long-Term Issuer Rating of "A"
on Barclays Bank PLC, both with Stable trends. Both entities meet
the eligible credit ratings in structured finance transactions and
are consistent with the credit ratings assigned to the rated notes
as described in Morningstar DBRS' "Legal and Derivative Criteria
for European Structured Finance Transactions" methodology.

Liquidity in the transaction is provided by a LRF which is
amortizing and sized at 1.0% of the Class A and Class B notes'
outstanding balance. It covers senior costs and expenses, swap
payments, and interest shortfalls for the Class A and Class B
notes. The LRF was be partially funded at closing at 0.1% of the
Class A and Class B notes' balance using the Class X notes'
issuance proceeds. It will then be subsequently funded through
available principal funds until the LRF target amount has been
transferred (disregarding LRF debits). From that date onwards, the
LRF will be funded through revenue. Any liquidity reserve excess
amount will be applied as available principal receipts, and the
reserve will be released in full once the Class B notes are fully
repaid. In addition, the Issuer can use principal to cover senior
costs and expenses, swap payments, and interest on the senior-most
class of notes outstanding and on the Class B to Class F notes
provided their relevant principal deficiency ledger (PDL) is not
greater than 10% of the respective class outstanding principal
amount. Principal can be used once the LRF has been exhausted.
Interest shortfalls on the Class B to Class Z notes, as long as
they are not the most senior class outstanding, shall be deferred
and not be recorded as an event of default until the final maturity
date or such earlier date on which the notes are fully redeemed.

Morningstar DBRS based its credit ratings on a review of the
following analytical considerations:

-- The transaction's capital structure, including the form and
sufficiency of available credit enhancement;

-- The credit quality of the mortgage portfolio and the servicer's
ability to perform collection and resolution activities.
Morningstar DBRS estimated stress-level probability of default
(PD), loss given default (LGD), and expected losses (EL) on the
mortgage portfolio. Morningstar DBRS used the PD, LGD, and EL as
inputs into the cash flow engine and analyzed the mortgage
portfolio in accordance with its "European RMBS Insight
Methodology";

-- The transaction's ability to withstand stressed cash flow
assumptions and repay the Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class
E, Class F, and Class X notes according to the terms of the
transaction documents;

-- The structural mitigants in place to avoid potential payment
disruptions caused by operational risk, such as a downgrade, and
replacement language in the transaction documents;

-- Morningstar DBRS' sovereign credit rating on the United Kingdom
of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of AA with a Stable trend as
of the date of this press release; and

-- The consistency of the transaction's legal structure with
Morningstar DBRS' "Legal and Derivative Criteria for European
Structured Finance Transactions" methodology and the presence of
legal opinions that address the assignment of the assets to the
Issuer.

Notes: All figures are in British pound sterling unless otherwise
noted.


SAGA PLC: S&P Withdraws 'B-' LongTerm Issuer Credit Rating
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew its 'B-' long-term issuer credit rating
on Saga PLC and its subsidiaries at the issuer's request following
the repayment of the GBP250 million senior unsecured bond due July
2026. S&P also withdrew its 'B-' issue ratings on the revolving
credit facility due May 2025.

The outlook was negative at the time of the withdrawal.


TOGETHER ASSET 2025-2ND1: DBRS Finalizes B(high) Rating on F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Ratings Limited finalized its provisional credit ratings on
the residential mortgage-backed notes issued by Together Asset
Backed Securitization 2025-2ND1 PLC (TABS 2025-2ND1 or the Issuer)
as follows:

-- Class A notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class B notes at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C notes at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D notes at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class E notes at BB (high) (sf)
-- Class F notes at B (high) (sf)

The finalized provisional credit ratings on the Class E and Class F
notes are higher than the provisional credit ratings Morningstar
DBRS assigned because of the lower cost of funding in the
transaction after the rated notes priced.

The credit rating on the Class A notes addresses the timely payment
of interest and the ultimate repayment of principal on or before
the final maturity date in September 2056. The credit ratings on
the Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, and Class F notes address
the timely payment of interest once they are the senior-most class
of notes outstanding and until then the ultimate payment of
interest and the ultimate repayment of principal on or before the
final maturity date.

Morningstar DBRS does not rate the Class Z notes or the residual
certificates also issued in this transaction.

CREDIT RATING RATIONALE

The Issuer is a bankruptcy-remote special-purpose vehicle
incorporated in England and Wales. The notes issued funded the
purchase of residential assets originated by Together Personal
Financial Services Limited (TPFL) and Together Commercial Financial
Services Limited (TCFL), part of the Together Financial Group
(Together or the Group) in the UK. TPFL and TCFL both act as the
servicers of the respective loans in the portfolio. Together is a
UK specialist provider of property finance. BCMGlobal Mortgage
Services Limited (BCMG) will act as the standby servicer.

This is the third public securitization backed by second-ranking
assets from the Together Group. The mortgage portfolio consists of
GBP 277 million of second-lien owner-occupied (OO) and buy-to-let
(BTL) mortgages secured by properties in the UK.

The Issuer issued seven tranches of collateralized mortgage-backed
securities (the Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, Class
F, and Class Z notes) to finance the purchase of the portfolio.

The transaction is structured to initially provide 28.0% of credit
enhancement to the Class A notes, including subordination of the
Class B to Class Z notes.

TABS 2025-2ND1 features a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap,
given the presence of a portion of fixed-rate loans with a
compulsory reversion to floating in the future. The liabilities pay
a coupon linked to the daily compounded Sterling Overnight Index
Average. Natixis S.A. (Natixis) is the swap counterparty as of
closing. Based on Morningstar DBRS' private credit rating on
Natixis, the downgrade provisions outlined in the documents, and
the transaction structural mitigants, Morningstar DBRS considers
the risk arising from the exposure to Natixis to be consistent with
the credit ratings assigned to the rated notes as described in
Morningstar DBRS' "Legal and Derivative Criteria for European
Structured Finance Transactions" methodology.

Furthermore, U.S. Bank Europe DAC's UK branch acts as the Issuer
Account Bank, and National Westminster Bank Plc as the Collection
Account Bank. Both entities are privately rated by Morningstar
DBRS, meet the eligible credit ratings in structured finance
transactions, and are consistent with the credit ratings assigned
to the rated notes as described in Morningstar DBRS' "Legal and
Derivative Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions"
methodology.

Liquidity in the transaction is provided by a Liquidity Facility
(LF), which is amortizing and sized at 1.35% of the outstanding
Class A and Class B notes' balance. It covers senior costs and
expenses, swap payments, and interest shortfalls for the Class A
and Class B notes (the latter after the full redemption of the
Class A notes). A Liquidity Reserve Fund (LRF) will be funded from
the step-up date through the waterfalls and sized at 1.35% of the
outstanding balance of the Class A and Class B notes, while the LF
is reduced by the amounts transferred to the LRF ledger. Any
liquidity reserve excess amount will be applied as available
revenue receipts. The reserve will be released in full once the
Class B notes are fully repaid. In addition, principal borrowing is
also envisaged under the transaction documentation and can be used
to cover for any shortfall in payment of senior fees, swap
payments, issuer profit amount, interest shortfalls of the most
senior outstanding class of notes (except the Class Z notes), and
to replenish the LRF. Principal is to be used ahead of the LRF and
LF.

Morningstar DBRS based its credit ratings on a review of the
following analytical considerations:

-- The transaction's capital structure, including the form and
sufficiency of available credit enhancement;

-- The credit quality of the mortgage portfolio and the ability of
the servicer to perform collection and resolution activities.
Morningstar DBRS estimated stress-level probability of default
(PD), loss given default (LGD), and expected losses (EL) on the
mortgage portfolio. Morningstar DBRS used the PD, LGD, and EL as
inputs into the cash flow engine. Morningstar DBRS analyzed the
mortgage portfolio in accordance with its "European RMBS Insight
Methodology";

-- The transaction's ability to withstand stressed cash flow
assumptions and repay the Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class
E, and Class F notes according to the terms of the transaction
documents;

-- The structural mitigants in place to avoid potential payment
disruptions caused by operational risk, such as a downgrade, and
replacement language in the transaction documents;

-- Morningstar DBRS' sovereign credit rating on the United Kingdom
of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of AA with a Stable trend as
of the date of this press release; and

-- The consistency of the transaction's legal structure with
Morningstar DBRS' "Legal and Derivative Criteria for European
Structured Finance Transactions" methodology and the presence of
legal opinions that address the assignment of the assets to the
Issuer.

Notes: All figures are in British pound sterling unless otherwise
noted.


TOGETHER ASSET 2025-CRE-1: S&P Assigns Prelim. B Rating on X Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary credit ratings to
Together Asset Backed Securitisation 2025-CRE-1 PLC's class A
notes, Loan notes, and B-Dfrd to X-Dfrd notes. At closing, the
issuer will also issue unrated class Z notes and residual
certificates.

The transaction is a static transaction that securitizes a
provisional portfolio of £522.2 million mortgage loans, secured on
commercial (82.4%), mixed-use (11.0%), and residential (6.6%)
properties in the U.K. The pool contains 607 loans (16.51%) of the
previous Together Asset Backed Securitisation 2021-CRE1
transaction.

This is the fifth transaction S&P has rated in the U.K. that
securitizes small ticket commercial mortgage loans after Together
Asset Backed Securitisation 2023-CRE-1 PLC. Together Commercial
Finance Ltd. originated the loans in the pool between 2012 and
2025.

S&P said, "We consider the nonresidential nature of most of the
pool as higher risk than a fully residential portfolio,
particularly the loss severity. We have nevertheless assessed these
loans' probability of default using our global residential loans
criteria as the method by which the loans were underwritten and are
serviced is similar to that of Together's residential mortgage
portfolio. On the loss severity side however, we have used our
covered bond commercial real estate criteria to fully capture the
market value declines associated with commercial properties."

At closing, credit enhancement for the rated notes will consist of
subordination. Following the step-up date, additional
overcollateralization will also provide credit enhancement. The
overcollateralization will result from the release of the excess
amount from the revenue priority of payments to the principal
priority of payments.

Liquidity support for the class A, Loan notes, and B-Dfrd notes
(when most senior) is in the form of an amortizing liquidity
facility and an amortizing liquidity reserve fund. The liquidity
facility will be available at closing and after the step-up date
the liquidity reserve fund will be funded from the revenue and
principal waterfalls. Principal can also be used to cure interest
shortfalls on all the tranches when they become the most senior.

At closing, the issuer will use the issuance proceeds to purchase
the beneficial interest in the mortgage loans from the seller. The
issuer grants security over its assets in the security trustee's
favor.

There are no rating constraints in the transaction under our
counterparty, operational risk, or structured finance sovereign
risk criteria. S&P said, "The issuer is an English special-purpose
entity (SPE), which we expect to be bankruptcy remote. We expect
the legal structure and transaction documents to be in line with
our legal criteria at closing."

  Preliminary Ratings

  Class   Prelim. Rating  Class size (%)

  A            AAA (sf)    20.88
  Loan notes   AAA (sf)    60.92
  B-Dfrd       AA (sf)      8.70
  C-Dfrd       A (sf)       3.00
  D-Dfrd       BBB+ (sf)    1.50
  X-Dfrd       B (sf)       7.50
  Z            NR           5.00
  Residual certs  N/A        N/A

  NR--Not rated.
  N/A--Not applicable.



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2025.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *