/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/230825.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Friday, August 25, 2023, Vol. 24, No. 171

                           Headlines



I R E L A N D

ALME LOAN V: S&P Affirms 'B- (sf)' Rating on Class F Notes


N E T H E R L A N D S

HOLLAND LIFT: Enters Liquidation, Ceases Trading


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

FREIGHT MANAGEMENT: Goes Into Administration
MAR ESTATES: Put Into Administration, Explores Options
MEREWAY KITCHENS: Bought Out of Administration by Sigma 3
UNIQUE PUB: S&P Lowers Class A4 Notes Rating to 'BB (sf)'
WILKO LTD: Administrators Say No Plan to Close Stores Next Week

WILKO LTD: HMV Owner Emerges as Potential Last-Minute Buyer


X X X X X X X X

[*] BOOK REVIEW: The First Junk Bond

                           - - - - -


=============
I R E L A N D
=============

ALME LOAN V: S&P Affirms 'B- (sf)' Rating on Class F Notes
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its credit ratings on ALME Loan Funding V
DAC's class B-1 and B-2 notes to 'AA+ (sf)' from 'AA (sf)', class
C-1 and C-2 notes to 'AA (sf)' from 'A (sf)', and class D notes to
'A- (sf)' from 'BBB (sf)'. S&P affirmed its 'AAA (sf)', 'BB (sf)',
and 'B- (sf)' ratings on the class A, E, and F notes,
respectively.

ALME Loan Funding V is a cash flow CLO transaction securitizing
leverage loans and is managed by Apollo Management International
LLP.

The rating actions follow the application of its relevant criteria
and our credit and cash flow analysis of the transaction based on
the July 2023 trustee report.

Since the transaction was reset in 2018:

-- The portfolio's credit quality has deteriorated slightly,
however, its weighted-average rating remains at 'B'.

-- Despite the CLO entering its amortization phase, the portfolio
has become more diversified (the number of performing obligors
increased to 124 from 109).

-- The portfolio's weighted-average life has decreased to 3.88
years from 6.17 years.

-- The percentage of 'CCC' rated assets has increased to 2.99%
from 2.57%.

Despite a slight deterioration in credit quality, the portfolio's
scenario default rates (SDRs) have decreased for all rating
scenarios, mainly due to its lower weighted-average life and
improved diversification.

  Table 1

  Transaction key metrics

                                    AS OF AUGUST 2023  
                                   (BASED ON THE JULY
                                       TRUSTEE REPORT)   AT RESET

  SPWARF                                   2740.48       2470.73*

  Default rate dispersion                   628.37        688.88

  Weighted-average life (years)               3.88          6.17

  Obligor diversity measure                  94.06         88.25

  Industry diversity measure                 17.12         16.73

  Regional diversity measure                  1.28          1.69

  Total collateral amount (mil. EUR)§       318.51        400.00

  Defaulted assets (mil. EUR)                    0             0

  Number of performing obligors                124           109

  Portfolio weighted-average rating              B             B

  'AAA' SDR (%)                              59.66         66.31

  'AAA' WARR (%)                             36.88         33.99

*Calculated using the portfolio at closing and applying our current
CLO criteria to derive an SPWARF for the comparison of portfolio
credit quality.
§Performing assets plus cash and expected recoveries on defaulted
assets.
SDR--Scenario default rate.
SPWARF--S&P Global Ratings' weighted-average rating factor.
WARR--Weighted-average recovery rate.

On the cash flow side:

-- The reinvestment period ended in July 2022. The class A notes
deleveraged by EUR79.83 million since then.

-- No class of notes defers interest.

-- All coverage tests are passing as of the July 2023 trustee
report.

  Table 2

  Credit analysis results

                          CREDIT ENHANCEMENT
                          AS OF AUGUST 2023(%)
          CURRENT AMOUNT  (BASED ON THE JULY  CREDIT ENHANCEMENT
  CLASS    (MIL. EUR)       TRUSTEE REPORT)      AT RESET (%)


  A          143.173            55.05            44.25

  B-1         47.947            33.39            27.00

  B-2         21.053            33.39            27.00

  C-1         15.526            25.54            20.75

  C-2          9.474            25.54            20.75

  D           19.700            19.35            15.83

  E           22.700            12.22            10.15

  F           10.600             8.90             7.50

Credit enhancement = [Performing balance + cash balance + recovery
on defaulted obligations (if any) – tranche balance (including
tranche balance of all senior tranches)] / [Performing balance +
cash balance + recovery on defaulted obligations (if any)].

In S&P's view, the portfolio is diversified across obligors,
industries, and asset characteristics.

S&P said, "Based on the improved SDRs and higher available credit
enhancement, we raised our ratings on the class B-1, B-2, C-1, C-2,
and D notes as the available credit enhancement is now commensurate
with higher stress levels. At the same time, we affirmed our
ratings on the class A, E, and F notes.

"Our cash flow analysis indicated higher ratings than those
currently assigned for the class C-1, C-2, D, E, and F notes. The
transaction has continued to amortize since the end of the
reinvestment period in July 2022. However, we have considered the
limited break-even default rate cushion at higher ratings, while
noting that the manager may still reinvest unscheduled redemption
proceeds and sale proceeds from credit-impaired and credit-improved
assets. Such reinvestments rather than repayment of the liabilities
may prolong the note repayment profile for the most senior class of
notes. We also considered the considerable portion of senior notes
outstanding and current macroeconomic conditions.

"In our view, the portfolio is granular, and well-diversified
across obligors, industries, and asset characteristics compared to
other CLO transactions we recently rated. Hence, we have not
performed any additional sensitivity analysis.

"Counterparty, operational, and legal risks are adequately
mitigated in line with our criteria.

"Following the application of our structured finance sovereign risk
criteria, we consider the transaction's exposure to country risk to
be limited at the assigned ratings, as the exposure to individual
sovereigns does not exceed the diversification thresholds outlined
in our criteria."




=====================
N E T H E R L A N D S
=====================

HOLLAND LIFT: Enters Liquidation, Ceases Trading
------------------------------------------------
Euan Youdale at Access International reports that Holland Lift has
gone into liquidation and has ceased all its activities.

The Netherlands-based scissor lift specialist is owned by Pro Delta
Investments, which acquired the company in 2013 and is also the
owner of access rental specialist Riwal.

Established in 1984 and headquartered in Hoorn, Holland Lift
International employs around 70 people in the Netherlands, and
Germany through Servi-Tec GmbH.

According to Access International, the company said that it had
faced several challenges in recent years, among those being the
substantial increase of steel prices, increasing overall running
costs and severe supply chain issues following the Covid pandemic,
along with the war in Ukraine.  In addition, Holland Lift noted
fierce competition from "low price newcomers".

"Despite a staff reorganisation [in 2021], and heavy investments,
which resulted in the launch of new designs and products and other
measures," added the company, "It proved not to be feasible to
ensure long term viability for the company."





===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

FREIGHT MANAGEMENT: Goes Into Administration
--------------------------------------------
Sam Metcalf at TheBusinessDesk.com reports that a Burton logistics
firm has fallen into administration after weeks of troubled
trading.

According to TheBusinessDesk.com, Freight Management European,
which trades as AMCO Logistics and was set up in 1998, has
appointed Currie Young to look after the day-to-day running of the
firm.

The move comes after AMCO posted a second notice of intention (NOI)
to appoint administrators on Aug. 1, TheBusinessDesk.com notes.

In its latest available accounts, made up to the end of 2021, the
firm employed 37 people, TheBusinessDesk.com discloses.


MAR ESTATES: Put Into Administration, Explores Options
------------------------------------------------------
Paul Trainer at Glasgow World reports that five star hotel Marr
Hall Golf and Spa Resort in Renfrewshire's faces an uncertain
future after the business was placed into administration.

The stately home hotel, located on a 240-acre woodland estate in
Bishopton, currently employs over 100 staff.

Management consulting company EY-Parthenon's Turnaround and
Restructuring Strategy team were appointed as joint administrators
of Mar Estates Limited and routes to a potential sale will now be
sought, Glasgow World relates.  The administrators said the hotel
will continue to trade while options are explored, Glasgow World
notes.

According to Glasgow World, a statement reads: "On August 22, 2023,
Andrew Dolliver, Kris Aspin and Luke Charleton of EY-Parthenon's
Turnaround and Restructuring Strategy team were appointed as Joint
Administrators of Mar Estates Limited, trading as Mar Hall Golf &
Spa Resort ("the Resort").

"The Resort will be marketed for sale, with the Joint
Administrators anticipating significant interest for this
high-profile asset."


MEREWAY KITCHENS: Bought Out of Administration by Sigma 3
---------------------------------------------------------
Business Sale reports that a family-run kitchen manufacturer has
been acquired out of administration by Sigma 3 Group, parent
company of Masterclass Kitchens.

Birmingham-based Mereway Kitchens fell into administration earlier
this month, saying it had faced a challenging few years of trading,
Business Sale relates.

According to Business Sale, the future of the firm has now been
secured, however, after its business and assets were acquired out
of administration by Sigma 3 Group, in a deal that the buyer
described as a "significant milestone" in its growth plans.

Mereway Kitchens was founded in 1986 and served as the UK supplier
to more than 100 independent retailers and national retailer John
Lewis.  Despite reporting nearly GBP19 million in turnover for the
year to December 2021 (up almost 30% year-on-year), the company
filed notice of intention to appoint administrators earlier this
month, Business Sale recounts.

At the time, the company, as cited by Business Sale, said that the
notice, filed on Aug. 2, would provide it with time to agree a sale
of the business.  The company confirmed that it was in the final
stages of talks with a then-unnamed buyer for a deal that would
secure the business' future and provide "significant new
investment" with "no disruption to supply", Business Sale
discloses.


UNIQUE PUB: S&P Lowers Class A4 Notes Rating to 'BB (sf)'
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered to 'BB (sf)' from 'BB+ (sf)' its credit
rating on Unique Pub Finance Co. PLC (The)'s class A4 notes. At the
same time, S&P affirmed its 'B (sf)' and 'B- (sf)' ratings on the
class M and N notes.

Transaction Structure

Unique Pub Finance is a corporate securitization of the U.K.
operating business of the leased and tenanted (L&T) pub estate
operator Unique Pub Properties Ltd. (UPP or the borrower). It
originally closed in June 1999 and was last tapped in February
2005.

The transaction features three classes of notes (A4, M, and N), the
proceeds of which have been on-lent by Unique Pub Finance to UPP
via issuer-borrower loans. The operating cash flows generated by
UPP are available to repay its borrowings from the issuer that, in
turn, uses those proceeds to service the notes, alongside any
amounts available under the liquidity facility and cash reserve.

In S&P's opinion, the transaction would qualify for the appointment
of an administrative receiver under the U.K. insolvency regime. An
obligor default would allow the noteholders to gain substantial
control over the charged assets prior to an administrator's
appointment, without necessarily accelerating the secured debt,
both at the issuer and at the borrower level.

Rating Rationale

S&P said, "Our ratings address the timely payment of interest and
principal due on the class A4 notes and the ultimate payment of
interest and principal on the deferrable class M and N notes. They
are based primarily on our ongoing assessment of the borrowing
group's underlying business risk profile (BRP), the integrity of
the transaction's legal and tax structure, and the robustness of
operating cash flows supported by structural enhancements.

"As part of our analysis, we assess whether the operating cash
flows generated by the borrower are sufficient to make the payments
required under the notes' loan agreements by using a debt service
coverage ratio (DSCR) analysis under a base-case and a downside
scenario. Our view of the borrowing group's potential to generate
cash flows is informed by our base-case operating cash flow
projection and our assessment of its BRP, which we derive using our
corporate methodology."

Business risk profile

S&P said, "We continue to assess the borrower's BRP as Fair,
supported by the group's sizeable scale of operations as part of
the consolidated Stonegate Pub Company (the largest pub operator in
the U.K.), its higher-than-average profitability, and the earnings
stability provided by L&T model. We believe the group is well
positioned to profit from the recovery in the industry after the
drop in demand resulting from pub closures and absorb shocks from
inflationary pressures and impact on demand in the current cost of
living crisis in the U.K."

Recent performance and events

Since the end of the financial year 2022, UPP has disposed of 18
pubs, ending the period to June 2023 with a securitized estate of
1,761 pubs. Despite the reduction, it is still the largest estate
among our rated U.K. pub universe.

Most of UPP's estate are community pubs, which are less exposed to
the reduced footfall in city centers following the aftermath of the
pandemic. For the financial year 2022, UPP reported total revenues
of GBP133.35 million, a 45% increase from financial year 2021,
while reported EBITDA of GBP112.9 million was about 55% above the
reported financial year 2021 results. However, this is still below
pre-pandemic results and reflects the reduced estate size; in 2019,
the group reported GBP147.6 million of revenues and GBP125 million
EBITDA. The overall improved performance in financial year 2022
compared with the previous year's is predominantly due to recovery
from the pandemic and full reopening of the group's estate, with
the EBITDA margin improving to 84.7%, from about 80.0%. This is in
line with pre-COVID-19 levels, driven by UPP's low-cost base, where
publicans face most of the cost pressures.

Cost inflation headwinds continue to pose a major challenge to the
hospitality sector as a whole, most notably in utilities, wages,
and food cost, even as energy prices ease. S&P said, "We believe
that the high levels of inflation seen during the first half of
2023 will decline toward the end of 2023 and continue to normalize
toward 2.4% in 2024 and will remain below 2.0% from 2025-2026.
While companies within the sector have increased prices and passed
through some of the cost inflation, weaker consumer confidence and
pressure on discretionary spending may limit the pace of earnings
recovery. As the cost of living crisis continues to constrain
customer's disposable incomes, we think that pressures on
profitability margins will remain elevated compared to the
historical level, and we expect the observed recovery in earnings
and cash generation to be delayed and more gradual for the
industry."

Given UPP's L&T business model, the company itself is less directly
exposed to increasing inflationary costs as these are largely borne
by the publicans. It generates revenue mostly from rent and tied-in
drink supply agreements. Although S&P recognizes that the recovery
in earnings and cash generation is faster in the L&T model,
economic conditions remain challenging and may still affect
publicans' ability to pay their rent, which can consequently
pressure UPP's ability to collect payments from the publicans.

Issuer's liquidity position

During financial year 2022, the issuer made GBP100 million of
principal repayments (plus GBP38 million of interest payments).
After the June 2023 payment date, the outstanding issuer/borrower
loan balance reduced to GBP425.75 million (versus GBP535 million at
the end of financial year 2022).

To meet principal and interest payments for the in third quarter
(Q3) financial year 2023, the issuer used cash generated by the
securitized estate and received a GBP6.0 million equity injection
from the wider Stonegate Group.

The cash reserve remains fully depleted and its account balance
after the June 2023 payment date is nil, GBP65 million below its
target level. Given the expected debt service in the next three
quarters, the reserve fund is unlikely to be replenished to its
required level in the next two to three years.

The committed liquidity facility remains fully undrawn with GBP89
million available to the issuer as of June 2023 (while GBP6.0
million was drawn on the liquidity facility in Q2 financial year
2023, it was subsequently repaid in Q3 following the GBP6.0 million
equity injection received from the wider Stonegate Group). The
liquidity facility available commitment is amortizing and reduced
to GBP89 million in June 2023 from GBP140 million in June 2022, and
will progressively reduce to GBP37 million in June 2024.

Amounts available to the class M and N notes are capped at GBP32.5
million while the class A4 notes are outstanding, and at GBP12.5
million for the class N notes while the class M notes are
outstanding.

S&P rates the class M and N notes on a deferrable basis in line
with the transaction documents. This means that if there are
insufficient funds available to the issuer to pay principal and
interest on the class M and N notes, the unpaid amounts could be
deferred and ultimately due in March 2032, along with accrued
interest on the deferred amounts. Non-payment on the class M and N
notes prior to March 2032 will not lead to an issuer event of
default.

Despite the deferrable feature of the class M notes, UPP has
indicated they intend to adhere to the scheduled amortization
profile and expect to fully repay class M notes by March 2024 (the
outstanding class M note balance after the June 2023 payment date
is GBP61 million).

S&P said, "Consequently, we expect drawings on the liquidity
facility will be required given the class M notes' rapid
amortization and insufficient cash flow projections coming from the
operating business. In total, we expect that by March 2024 about
GBP8.5 million will be drawn on the liquidity." Given the cash
reserve has also been fully depleted, the remaining liquidity of
approximately GBP29.5 million after the March 2024 interest payment
date would only provide six months of debt service coverage for the
class A4 notes.

The issuer's liquidity position will start improving once the class
M notes fully repay, but it will take time. The liquidity facility
and the reserve fund are expected to be replenished to their target
levels within two to three years after the class M notes expected
repayment in March 2024. During this period, the issuer's liquidity
position will remain materially weakened.

DSCR analysis

S&P's cash flow analysis serves to both assess whether cash flows
will be sufficient to service debt through the transaction's life
and to project minimum DSCRs in our base-case and downside
scenarios.

Base-case forecast

S&P said, "Our base-case EBITDA and operating cash flow projections
in the short term and the company's satisfactory BRP rely on our
corporate methodology. We give credit to growth through to the end
of financial year 2024. Beyond that, our base-case projections are
based on our methodology and assumptions for corporate
securitizations, from which we then apply assumptions for capital
expenditures (capex) and taxes, to arrive at our projections for
the cash flow available for debt service."

UPP's earnings depend largely on general economic activity and
discretionary consumer demand. Considering the economic outlook,
and UPP's financial year 2022 results, S&P has revised its
forecasts of Unique Pub Finance's business performance through to
2025. S&P's current macroeconomic assumptions are:

-- The U.K. economic outlook has improved but continues to face
challenging times. S&P now expects flat growth for 2023 compared
with a 0.5% contraction in its previous forecast. S&P expects
positive growth of 0.9% in 2024 and average growth of 1.6% in
2025-2026.

-- Inflation remains elevated but S&P expects it to fall
substantially to just above 4.0% by year-end 2023, to 2.4% in 2024,
and below 2% in 2025-2026.

S&P said, "Downside risks to our forecasts prevail. They are still
mainly linked to geopolitical developments and the consequences of
higher interest rates, in terms of the calibration of monetary
policy for both demand and financial stability. Risks to global
sentiment and energy and commodity prices from an escalation of
Russia's war on Ukraine remain elevated, although less so than a
few months ago partly thanks to continental Europe's better
preparedness for next winter."

Considering our macroeconomic outlook and UPP's signs of recovery,
S&P revised slightly upwards its operating cash flows forecasts
through to financial year 2025.

S&P said, "We expect financial year 2023 overall revenues to be
about 10% higher than the previous year's levels and relatively
flat thereafter as a result of the fewer pubs given the business'
expected disposal profile.

"We expect RPI-linked rental income, which has already exceeded the
pre-pandemic levels, to support revenue growth. Drink and food
income has largely recovered to the pre-pandemic levels, and we
expect it to continue to grow supported by pass-through price
increases resulting from inflationary pressures. However, recent
beer price increases have decreased demand and total sales of beer.
This follows a long-term trend of diminishing beer consumption.

"We typically do not give any credit to disposal proceeds in our
cash flow analysis as we do not consider them to be internal cash
generated by the assets. Equally, we do not consider the buildup of
disposal proceeds in the disposal account as a source of cash for
debt service as we cannot discount the possibility that the
borrower could apply disposal proceeds to non-debt service
payments. However, given the confirmation provided by the
management that UPP's business strategy is to dispose of
weaker-performing or closed-for-business pubs and reinvest all net
sale proceeds to fund the maintenance and development capex, we
accounted for it in our analysis.

"In financial year 2023 and financial year 2024 we assumed that the
borrower will reinvest about GBP25 million of disposals proceeds to
fund capex. In the first three quarters of financial year 2023, UPP
disposed of 18 tenanted pubs from the securitization estate for net
sale proceeds of about GBP22 million based on the investor reports.
We expect further disposals to happen in Q4 financial year 2023."

S&P established an anchor of 'bb' for the class A4 notes and an
anchor of 'b-' for the class M and N notes based on:

-- S&P's assessment of UPP's Fair BRP, which it associates with a
business volatility score of 4.

-- The minimum DSCR achieved in our base-case analysis, which
considers both scenarios: only operating-level cash flows, and
operating-level cash flows with disposal proceeds in financial year
2023 and financial year 2024. Under both scenarios the output of
the base-case DSCR analysis supported the established anchor for
each tranche.

-- No credit given to issuer-level structural features (such as
the liquidity facility).

-- In the context of low DSCRs for the class M and N notes S&P
considered the borrower's creditworthiness and the notes'
deferrable feature.

Downside DSCR analysis

S&P said, "Our downside DSCR analysis tests whether the
issuer-level structural enhancements improve the transaction's
resilience under a moderate stress scenario. UPP falls within the
pubs, restaurants, and retail industry. Considering U.K. pubs'
historical performance during the financial crisis of 2007-2008, in
our view, a 25% decline in EBITDA from our base case is appropriate
for the tenanted pub subsector.

"We applied the decline to the base case at the point where we
believe the stress on debt service would be greatest.

"Our downside DSCR analysis resulted in a satisfactory resilience
score for the class A4 notes, lower than at our previous review,
and a weak resilience score for the class M and N notes, which
remains unchanged.

"This reflects the headroom above a 1.3:1.0 DSCR threshold that is
required under our criteria to achieve a satisfactory resilience
score after considering the level of liquidity support available to
class A4 notes."

Both the class M and N notes have limits on the amount of the
liquidity facility they may use to cover liquidity shortfalls. Due
to their deferrable feature, which means that these notes cannot
default before their legal final maturity date (March 2032), these
classes of notes will not experience interest shortfalls under
S&P's downside DSCR analysis within three to four years.
Consequently, the resulting resilience scores are weak for both
classes of notes.

The combination of a satisfactory resilience score and the 'bb'
anchor derived in the base case results in a resilience-adjusted
anchor of 'bbb-' for the class A4 notes. Similarly, the combination
of a weak resilience score and the 'b-' anchor derived in the base
case results in resilience-adjusted anchors of 'b' for the class M
and N notes.

Liquidity facility adjustment

Currently the liquidity facility amount available to the issuer for
the class A4 notes represents a significant level of liquidity
support, measured as a percentage of their total current
outstanding balance. S&P said, "Considering the class A4 targeted
amortization schedule, the liquidity facility's amortizing profile,
and the anticipated drawings to support the repayment of the class
M notes, we expect liquidity support available to the class A4
notes to weaken to about 19.0% from 51.0% but it will remain above
the 10% threshold anticipated by our corporate securitization
criteria. Thereafter the liquidity facility amount available to
class A4 notes is expected to improve. We have therefore maintained
a one-notch increase to the resilience-adjusted anchor for the size
of the available liquidity support relative to the class A4 note
balance."

S&P did not adjust the class M and N notes' resilience-adjusted
anchors, unchanged from our previous review and in line with its
corporate securitization criteria.

Modifiers analysis

S&P said, "We applied a one-notch downward adjustment to the class
N notes to reflect their subordination and weaker access to the
security package compared to the class M notes. We have also
applied a two-notch downward adjustment to the class A4 notes to
reflect the weaknesses of the effectiveness of the two main
covenant tests (financial covenant and restricted payment condition
covenant), which is unchanged since our Nov. 22, 2019 review."

Comparable rating analysis

S&P said, "Based on our corporate securitization criteria, the
rated notes should benefit from liquidity provisions at the
securitization issuer level, to cover for disruption of cash flows
arising from an insolvency of the operating company. We typically
expect 12-18 months of the debt service coverage for a sufficient
liquidity position. Under the transaction structure, a GBP65
million cash reserve at the borrower level combined with an
amortizing tranched liquidity facility at the issuer level aims to
cover about 18 months of debt service (including deferrable notes)
and constitutes strong liquidity support for the class A4 notes.

"As noted above, we expect the issuer's liquidity position will
deteriorate over the next three quarters as the concurrent
amortization of the class A4 and class M notes until March 2024
represents a significant debt burden for the structure. In our
view, satisfaction of the target notes' repayment profile will
require drawdowns on the liquidity facility, and the cash reserve
has already been fully depleted to meet prior debt service
payments.

"In our view, utilization of the available liquidity for the class
M notes repayment puts the class A4 notes' liquidity position at
risk. Considering the expected GBP8.5 million drawdowns on the
liquidity, there will be limited coverage in the
structure-six-months' debt service coverage. We recognize that this
is a temporary issue and the issuer's liquidity position will start
improving once class M notes are paid in full, but it will take
time, about two years, to restore it to a satisfactory level."

Peer transactions within the same sector have about 18 months of
debt service coverage in their structures.

S&P said, "Overall, based on the comparable rating analysis, we
applied a one-notch negative adjustment to the class A4 notes'
potential rating.

"We also applied a one-notch downward adjustment to the class N
notes' potential rating to reflect their subordination and weaker
access to the security package compared to the mezzanine class M
notes."

Counterparty risk

S&P's ratings on the notes are not currently constrained by the
long-term issuer credit ratings on any of the counterparties,
including the liquidity facility provider (Barclays Bank PLC) and
bank account providers (National Westminster Bank PLC and Barclays
Bank PLC).

Outlook

S&P said, "We expect the pub sector's earnings growth to remain
subdued over the next 12-24 months as the sector continues to be
challenged by the macroeconomic situation in the U.K. where high
inflation and pressures on discretionary income could further
pressure the publicans. Improvement in UPP's profitability in 2023
paired with debt repayments as per the targeted amortization
schedule should help continue reducing leverage, while decreasing
liquidity over the next 12 months. Our expectations of recovery in
profitability and credit metrics in the reminder of 2023 and 2024
as well as the group's liquidity profile will be the key factors in
shaping our views of issuers' underlying credit quality and will be
the main reason for any future rating actions.

"We anticipate that wet-led operators may fare better over the near
term in the face of the inflationary pressures and its effects on
customer demand and the cost of living in the U.K. For many rated
pub operators, their significant freehold property portfolios have
offered substantial operational and financial flexibility, but we
have yet to see meaningful large-scale valuation support from
conversions or alternative uses for pub properties. Rather, we
expect that their quality of earnings will be a more defining
factor in the credit profile compared with the quantum of real
estate ownership.

"We expect the L&T model to show more resilience going forward than
the managed model. This is because under the latter the pub is
directly exposed to increasing costs, which creates higher pressure
and volatility on earnings. For our complete view of the sector and
the factors that will shape its performance over the near to medium
term."

Downside scenario

S&P said, "We may consider lowering our rating on the class A4
notes if the minimum projected DSCRs in our downside scenario have
a material-adverse effect on the class A4 notes'
resilience-adjusted anchor.

"We may also consider lowering our rating on the class A4 notes if
the minimum forecast DSCR weakens in our base-case scenario, or if
there are higher liquidity draws than we currently expect.

"We could lower our ratings on the class M or N notes if there was
a deterioration in our assessment of the borrower's overall
creditworthiness, which reflects its financial, liquidity, and
operational strength over the short-to-medium term. This could be
the result of increased leverage at UPP, driven by a material
increase in outstanding debt."

Upside scenario

S&P said, "We could raise our rating on the class A4 notes if our
minimum DSCR improves to the upper end of the 1.80x-1.30x range in
our base-case scenario. Alternatively, we could take a positive
rating action if UPP's BRP were to increase, although this is
unlikely over the near to medium term. Following redemption of the
class M notes, and subject to an improvement of the liquidity
position for the class A4 improves we will consider if removing the
comparable rating analysis negative adjustment is warranted."


WILKO LTD: Administrators Say No Plan to Close Stores Next Week
---------------------------------------------------------------
Simon Walton at York Press reports that administrators for the
stricken retailer Wilko have denied plans to close stores next week
after the GMB union said "the majority" would be shut.

According to York Press, the GMB said it was told the high street
chain -- which has a branch in York at Clifton Moor and also at
Abbey Walk Shopping Centre in Selby -- is set to announce a raft of
redundancies as a result.

However, administrators at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) said claims
the stricken retailer would close stores next week were
"speculation", York Press relates.

The GMB, which represents more than 3,000 of Wilko's 12,500 staff,
issued another statement on Aug. 23 saying closures would occur
"within weeks" rather than "within a week", York Press recounts.

The retailer tumbled into administration two weeks ago, putting the
future of its 400 shops in doubt, York Press discloses.

Administrators from PwC then sought offers from potentially
interested firms in an effort to save jobs and stores, York Press
relays.

According to York Press, the union said on Aug. 23 it was told in a
meeting that "there is no longer any prospect that the majority of
the business will be saved".

As a result, it said there are expected to be redundancies
affecting staff in stores and call centres, York Press notes.

Some stores may still be bought, either individually or as part of
larger packages, as part of the insolvency process, York Press
discloses.

According to York Press, in a statement, the joint administrators
of Wilko denied the claims and said: "In the immediate term, all
stores remain open, continue to trade and staff continue to be
paid.

"Contrary to speculation, there are currently no plans to close any
stores next week."

But the administrators admitted "redundancies and store closures in
the future" were "likely" and said employees representatives had
been informed.


WILKO LTD: HMV Owner Emerges as Potential Last-Minute Buyer
-----------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Woolfson at The Telegraph reports that the Canadian
businessman who brought HMV back from the brink of oblivion has
emerged as a potential last-minute buyer for collapsed chain
Wilko.

According to The Telegraph, Doug Putman, who is credited with
reversing the fortunes of HMV after buying it out of administration
in 2019, has initiated talks with Wilko's administrators at PwC
about acquiring around half of Wilko's 400 shops -- although it is
understood no formal bid has been tabled.

Around 10 other parties are understood to be interested in
acquiring stores, including a small number that have expressed an
interest in potentially buying more than 50 stores, The Telegraph
discloses.

News of Mr. Putman's interest, first reported by The Times, raises
the prospect that thousands of jobs could be saved at the fallen
high street chain, which collapsed into administration earlier this
month after struggling to recover from the pandemic and failing to
secure a buyer, The Telegraph notes.

Mr. Putman would, reportedly, continue to run a number of shops
under the Wilko brand if he were to acquire them. It is expected a
further announcement on the future of Wilko will be made over the
coming week, The Telegraph states.

It comes one day after PwC warned it was likely many of Wilko's
stores would close and jobs would be lost, The Telegraph relays.

"While discussions continue with those interested in buying parts
of the business, it's clear that the nature of this interest is not
focused on the whole Group," The Telegraph quotes the company as
saying on Aug. 23.

A PwC spokesman added on Aug. 24: "As administrators we're intent
on achieving the best outcome for everyone involved while
preserving as many jobs as possible and adhering to our statutory
duty to act in the best interests of the creditors as a whole.

"It would be inappropriate to comment on individual bidders or
interested parties at this stage in the process."

Rival discount retailers including B&M, which is run by the Arora
brothers, are also reportedly interested in acquiring some of
Wilko's stores, The Telegraph states.




===============
X X X X X X X X
===============

[*] BOOK REVIEW: The First Junk Bond
------------------------------------
Author: Harlan D. Platt
Publisher: Beard Books
Softcover: 236 pages
List Price: $34.95
http://www.beardbooks.com/beardbooks/the_first_junk_bond.html

Only one in ten failed businesses is equal to the task of
reorganizing itself and satisfying its prior debts in some
fashion.

This engrossing book follows the extraordinary journey of Texas
International, Inc. (known by its New York Stock Exchange stock
symbol, TEI), through its corporate growth and decline, debt
exchange offers, and corporate renaissance as Phoenix Resource
Companies, Inc. As Harlan Platt puts it, TEI "flourished for a
brief luminous moment but then crashed to earth and was consumed."

TEI's story features attention-grabbing characters, petroleum
exploration innovations, financial innovations, and lots of risk
taking.

The First Junk Bond was originally published in 1994 and received
solidly favorable reviews. The then-managing director of High Yield
Securities Research and Economics for Merrill Lynch said that the
book "is a richly detailed case study. Platt integrates corporate
history, industry fundamentals, financial analysis and bankruptcy
law on a scale that has rarely, if ever, been attempted." A retired
U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge noted, "[i]t should appeal as
supplementary reading to students in both business schools and law
schools. Even those who practice.in the areas of business law,
accounting and investments can obtain a greater understanding and
perspective of their professional expertise."

"TEI's saga is noteworthy because of the company's resilience and
ingenuity in coping with the changing environment of the 1980s, its
execution of innovative corporate strategies that were widely
imitated and its extraordinary trading history," says the author.

TEI issued the first junk bond. In 1986 it achieved the largest
percentage gain on the NYSE, and in 1987 suffered the largest
percentage loss. It issued one of the first bonds secured by a
physical commodity and then later issued one of the first PIK
(payment in kind) bonds. It was one of the first vulture investors,
to be targeted by vulture investors later on. Its president was
involved in an insider trading scandal. It innovated strip
financing. It engaged in several workouts to sell off operations
and raise cash to reduce debt. It completed three exchange offers
that converted debt in to equity.

In 1977, TEI, primarily an oil production outfit, had had a
reprieve from bankruptcy through Michael Milken's first ever junk
bond. The fresh capital had allowed TEI to acquire a controlling
interest of Phoenix Resources Company, a part of King Resources
Company. TEI purchased creditors' claims against King that were
subsequently converted into stock under the terms of King's
reorganization plan. Only two years later, cash deficiencies forced
Phoenix to sell off its non-energy businesses. Vulture investors
tried to buy up outstanding TEI stock. TEI sold off its own
non-energy businesses, and focused on oil and gas exploration. An
enormous oil discovery in Egypt made the future look grand. The
value of TEI stock soared. Somehow, however, less than two years
later, TEI was in bankruptcy. What a ride!

All told, the book has 63 tables and 32 figures on all aspects of
TEI's rise, fall, and renaissance. Businesspeople will find
especially absorbing the details of how the company's bankruptcy
filing affected various stakeholders, the bankruptcy negotiation
process, and the alternative post-bankruptcy financial structures
that were considered. Those interested in the oil and gas industry
will find the book a primer on the subject, with an appendix
devoted to exploration and drilling, and another on oil and gas
accounting.

Dr. Harlan D. Platt is a professor of Finance at D'Amore-McKim
School of Business at Northeastern University. He is a member of
the Board of Directors of Millennium Chemicals Inc. and is on the
advisory board of the Millennium Liquidating Trust. He served as
the Associate Editor-Finance for the Journal of Business Research.
He received a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan, and holds a
B.A. degree from Northwestern University.

This book may be ordered by calling 888-563-4573 or by visiting
www.beardbooks.com or through your favorite Internet or local
bookseller.



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2023.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *