/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/230822.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Tuesday, August 22, 2023, Vol. 24, No. 168

                           Headlines



F R A N C E

ALTICE FRANCE: EUR1.72BB Bank Debt Trades at 16% Discount
ALTICE FRANCE: Lord Abbett CB Marks $12.7MM Loan at 16% Off


N E T H E R L A N D S

LEALAND FINANCE: $500MM Bank Debt Trades at 42% Discount
PHM NETHERLANDS: $370MM Bank Debt Trades at 17% Discount


R U S S I A

ASIA INSURANCE: S&P Affirms 'B-' Financial Strength Rating


S W I T Z E R L A N D

SYNGENTA AG: Moody's Withdraws 'Ba1' CFR, Alters Outlook to Stable


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

ASPIRE-IGEN LTD: Two Yorkshire Entrepreneurs Owed GBP70,000
BORDER STEELWORK: Enters Administration, 43 Jobs Affected
CHARNWOOD PAINT: Enters Administration Amid Trading Difficulties
FARFETCH LIMITED: Fitch Affirms LongTerm IDR at B-, Outlook Stable
FARFETCH LTD: S&P Affirms 'B-' Long-Term ICR, Outlook Negative

GREENSILL CAPITAL: IAG Australia Reports US$4.5-Bil. Claims
PINNACLE BIDCO: Fitch Affirms LongTerm IDR at 'B-', Outlook Stable
PLATFORM BIDCO: GBP417.5MM Bank Debt Trades at 18% Discount
TRENCH NETWORKS: Bought Out of Administration via Pre-Pack Deal
VUE INTERNATIONAL: Lord Abbett CB Marks $9.2MM Loan at 43% Off

VUE INTERNATIONAL: Lord Abbett HY Marks EUR1.2MM Loan at 55% Off

                           - - - - -


===========
F R A N C E
===========

ALTICE FRANCE: EUR1.72BB Bank Debt Trades at 16% Discount
---------------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Altice France SA is
a borrower were trading in the secondary market around 84.4
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, August 18, 2023,
according to Bloomberg's Evaluated Pricing service data.

The EUR1.72 billion facility is a Term loan that is scheduled to
mature on August 31, 2028.  The amount is fully drawn and
outstanding.

Altice France provides wireless telecommunication services. The
Company offers fiber optic network solutions for all type of
media.  Altice France serves customers in France.


ALTICE FRANCE: Lord Abbett CB Marks $12.7MM Loan at 16% Off
-----------------------------------------------------------
Lord Abbett Corporate Bond Fund has marked its $12,758,337 loan
extended to Altice France SA to market at $10,706,413 or 84% of the
outstanding amount, as of May 31, 2023, according to Lord Abbett
CB's semi-annual report on Form N-CSR for the period from December
1, 2022 to May 31, 2023, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Lord Abbett CB is a participant in a 2023 USD Term Loan B14
(France) to Altice France SA. The loan accrues interest at a rate
of 10.49% per annum. The loan matures on August 15, 2028.

Lord Abbett Investment Trust is registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end
management investment company and was organized as a Delaware
statutory trust on August 16, 1993. The Trust currently consists of
14 funds as of May 31, 2023. The semi-annual report covers 12 of
the funds namely: Lord Abbett Convertible Fund, Lord Abbett Core
Fixed Income Fund, Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund, Lord Abbett
Corporate Bond Fund, Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund, Lord Abbett
High Yield Fund, Lord Abbett Income Fund, Lord Abbett Inflation
Focused Fund, Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund, Lord
Abbett Total Return Fund, Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund.

Altice France provides wireless telecommunication services. The
Company offers fiber optic network solutions for all type of media.
Altice France serves customers in France.




=====================
N E T H E R L A N D S
=====================

LEALAND FINANCE: $500MM Bank Debt Trades at 42% Discount
--------------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Lealand Finance Co
BV is a borrower were trading in the secondary market around 57.6
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, August 18, 2023,
according to Bloomberg's Evaluated Pricing service data.

The $500 million facility is a Term loan that is scheduled to
mature on June 30, 2025.  The amount is fully drawn and
outstanding.

Lealand Finance is an affiliate of CB&I Holdings B.V. and Chicago
Bridge & Iron Company B.V. The Company's country of domicile is the
Netherlands.


PHM NETHERLANDS: $370MM Bank Debt Trades at 17% Discount
--------------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which PHM Netherlands
Midco BV is a borrower were trading in the secondary market around
82.8 cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, August 18,
2023, according to Bloomberg's Evaluated Pricing service data.

The $370 million facility is a Term loan that is scheduled to
mature on August 1, 2026.  The amount is fully drawn and
outstanding.

PHM Netherlands Midco B.V., is the owner of Loparex International
B.V., a developer and producer of specialty paper and film release
liners.  PHM Netherlands' country of domicile is the Netherlands.



===========
R U S S I A
===========

ASIA INSURANCE: S&P Affirms 'B-' Financial Strength Rating
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' long-term financial strength
rating on Asia Insurance Sug'urta Kompaniyasi JSC (AI). The outlook
is positive.

S&P said, "AI's capital adequacy will be supported by a capital
injection and retained earnings, despite larger investments in
affiliates than we expected and losses in the first half of this
year. AI's capital adequacy according to our capital model was 11%
below the 'BBB' confidence level in 2022. We expect its capital
adequacy will gradually improve to the 'BBB' level by 2024,
benefiting from an expected capital injection in the third quarter
of this year, retention of 100% of net profit for 2023 unlike our
previous expectation of 40% payouts, and moderate premium growth of
13%-15% versus the market in 2023-2024. Moreover, we previously
anticipated a divestment from statutory funds of affiliated
companies, but the company now plans to increase investments in
affiliates to UZS17.6 billion in 2023 from UZS8.9 billion in 2022.
We expect this will somewhat curb the buildup of capital adequacy
according to our capital model, since we deduct such investments
from total adjusted capital. We note the company has a small
capital base in absolute terms (below $5 million), which makes it
susceptible to single-event losses, for example, a catastrophic
earthquake in the Tashkent region."

AI has been profitable over the past five years, although its
technical performance has been volatile. The company reported a net
loss of UZS3 billion over the first six months of 2023 amid an
increased unearned premium reserve (UPR) associated with one big
contract renewed in 2023 and a one-off claim of UZS5 billion. S&P
said, "We expect AI's combined (loss and expense) ratio for the
full year of 2023 may be higher than 100%, versus our previous
expectation of 99%. However, we expect its investment income will
contribute to overall profitability. In addition, expense control
should also partly offset negative underwriting performance and we
forecast a return on equity of 10%-14% in 2023 and 15%-17% in 2024,
supported by a gradual recovery of the UPR as well as interest and
rental income. Our capital projections include combined ratios of
105% in 2023 and 102% in 2024-2025, in line with the market
average, and dividend playouts of about 40% of net income in
2024-2025."

AI's solvency level meets local regulatory requirements. However,
the margin to the minimum requirement of 1.0x remains relatively
narrow: it was 1.05x as of July 1, 2023, 1.19x at year-end 2022,
and 1.49% at year-end 2021. Under our base case, we expect the
ratio will remain above the minimum requirement in the next 12
months, benefiting from the capital injection and gradually
increasing profitability.

AI's position in Uzbekistan's property and casualty insurance
market remains relatively weak, although with growth potential. AI
has a very limited market share in Uzbekistan of 1.5% as of Dec.
31, 2022, although it was established in 2005 and has operated
profitably since then. It showed modest premium growth of 4% in
2022 due to its conservative underwriting, versus market growth of
56%. Its absolute size remains very small in a global context, with
gross premiums written at about UZS56 billion or less than $5
million in 2022. S&P views the market as still nascent and the
operating environment as difficult, which to some extent restrict
our assessment of the company's overall business profile.

The positive outlook indicates the possibility of an upgrade over
the next 12 months.

Upside scenario

S&P could raise the rating over the next 12 months if the company's
capital materially increases, while its business risk profile
remains supported by sustainable and profitable growth.

For a positive rating action, S&P would also expect no significant
deficiencies in management and governance, whether in financial
reporting standards or risk controls, including related-party
transactions.

Downside scenario

S&P could revise the outlook to stable in the next 12 months if it
see:

-- AI underperforming our base-case expectations, or risks to its
market standing, for example, due to a spike in competition.

-- A deterioration of the capital base due to weaker-than-expected
operating performance and investment losses, increasing investments
in affiliates, an unplanned rise in dividends, or AI being used to
support the shareholders' other businesses.

-- A decline in the regulatory solvency margin due to
higher-than-expected losses or premium growth, for example,
resulting in an increased risk of regulatory intervention--although
S&P sees this as remote.

-- Significant and sustained weakening of asset quality.

-- Deficiencies in management and governance, including financial
reporting or risk controls, which S&P views as detrimental for AI's
credit profile.




=====================
S W I T Z E R L A N D
=====================

SYNGENTA AG: Moody's Withdraws 'Ba1' CFR, Alters Outlook to Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Baa3 issuer rating to
Syngenta AG, and withdrawn its Ba1 corporate family rating.

At the same time, Moody's has upgraded to Baa3 from Ba1 the
guaranteed senior unsecured ratings of its guaranteed subsidiaries
Syngenta Finance N.V. and Syngenta Finance AG, and to (P)Baa3 from
(P)Ba1 their guaranteed senior unsecured medium-term note (MTN)
program rating. Moody's has also upgraded to P-3 from Not Prime the
other short-term ratings of Syngenta, and to P-3 from Not Prime the
guaranteed commercial paper rating from its guaranteed subsidiaries
Syngenta Wilmington Inc. and Syngenta Finance N.V.

Moody's has also revised the outlook on these ratings to stable
from positive.

"The rating upgrade reflects Syngenta's track record of improving
its credit and business profiles, as well as Moody's expectation
that these improvements can be sustained due to its solid market
position in the global crop protection and seed markets. Moody's
also expect that the company will maintain its prudent financial
policy while it benefits from its positioning as an important
operating subsidiary of Syngenta Group Co., Ltd. (Baa1 stable) and
ultimately China's central government-owned Sinochem Holdings
Corporation Ltd, which underpins Syngenta's track record of good
funding access since its acquisition in 2017," says Gerwin Ho, a
Moody's Vice President and Senior Credit Officer.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Syngenta's Baa3 issuer rating reflects the company's solid
positions in the global crop protection and seed markets
underpinned by its strong product offerings, improving financial
profile, prudent financial management and good free cash flow
generation capability.

On the other hand, the Baa3 issuer rating is constrained by
Syngenta's exposure to the cyclical crop protection business and
high seasonal working capital swings.

Syngenta performed strongly in 2022, mainly benefiting from better
product pricing and higher sales volumes. Sales growth accelerated
to 19% year-on-year (YOY) and Moody's adjusted EBITDA to 15% YOY in
2022, driven by the crop protection and seed segments. Given the
EBITDA growth, the company's leverage, as measured by
Moody's-adjusted debt/EBITDA, improved to 3.5x in 2022 from 3.9x in
2021.

Moody's expects Syngenta's earnings to moderately weaken in 2023,
mainly because of a volume decline, especially in the crop
protection business due to significant de-stocking in the global
agrochemical industry. However, underlying demand for agrochemical
products is likely to remain strong, benefiting from moderating but
still-elevated crop prices. As a result, Moody's expects Syngenta's
leverage to remain largely stable at around 3.5x in 2023, as the
company will reduce inventory carry and subsequently lower the debt
level to offset expected weaker earnings.

As the agrochemical industry reset inventory back to normal levels
in 2024, Syngenta is likely to continue deleveraging with
debt/EBITDA improving towards 3.0x, as the expected positive free
cash flow will keep supporting its debt reduction. Such a leverage
level will support its rating.

As an important operating subsidiary of Syngenta Group, Syngenta
benefits from strong funding support from its parent. As of the end
of 2022, Syngenta received intercompany loans of $1.6 billion and
revolving credit facilities of $1.5 billion from its immediate
parent Syngenta Group, which help it manage its large seasonal
working capital funding needs.

Syngenta's liquidity is excellent. As of the end of December 2022
Syngenta had cash balances of $1.4 billion, as well as two
committed revolving credit facilities (RCF) totaling $4.0 billion.
Based on the existing cash balance and available committed credit
facilities, and together with Moody's forecast for positive free
cash flow generation in 2023 and 2024, Syngenta will have more than
sufficient liquidity to meet its debt maturities over the next
12-18 months.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) CONSIDERATIONS

Syngenta's ESG attributes have a limited impact on the current
rating. Syngenta faces inherent risk exposure to the agrochemical
industry such as waste and pollution, climate conditions, and safe
production. Such risk exposure is partly tempered by company's
leading innovative product offerings in agrochemicals and seeds
that support sustainable agriculture.

Syngenta's governance risk assessment primarily reflects its board
structure that features concentrated ownership.  However, company's
track record of pursuing a prudent financial management policy
provides some mitigation.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation that
Syngenta will continue to grow its scale and maintain its solid
market position, while remaining disciplined in its financial
management with good free cash flow generation capability.

Moody's could upgrade Syngenta's ratings if Syngenta continues to
improve its credit and business profiles, while pursuing a prudent
financial policy. Credit metrics indicative of an upgrade of
Syngenta's rating include Moody's-adjusted debt/EBITDA dropping
below 3.0x on a sustained basis.

Moody's could downgrade Syngenta's ratings if Syngenta's credit or
business profile significantly weakens. Credit metrics indicative
of a downgrade include Moody's-adjusted debt/EBITDA increasing
above 4.5x on a sustained basis. Failure to maintain a strong
liquidity position could also pressure its ratings.



===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

ASPIRE-IGEN LTD: Two Yorkshire Entrepreneurs Owed GBP70,000
-----------------------------------------------------------
Greg Wright at Yorkshire Post reports that two Yorkshire
entrepreneurs are owed around GBP70,000 after an independent
learning provider collapsed into administration.

According to Yorkshire Post, Toni Eastwood of Beyond2030 and Jenn
Crowther of Yorkshire in Business have been left with a significant
shortfall after carrying out work for Bradford-based Aspire-Igen
Ltd, which had eight training centres.

Administrators were appointed to Aspire-Igen after the company
suffered from decreased cashflow with its financial problems
escalating following an "inadequate" Ofsted report which resulted
in a reduction in the number of learners, Yorkshire Post relates.

The directors sought advice and subsequently appointed Begbies
Traynor to help place the company into administration, Yorkshire
Post discloses.

Ms. Eastwood said she and Ms. Crowther were part of a group of
specialists in the region that were invited to devise plans for a
project to be supported by ESF (European Social Fund) funding which
would focus on issues such as gender stereotyping, the pay gap,
women's enterprise and women in leadership, Yorkshire Post notes.

She said both women are facing financial strain due to
Aspire-Igen's collapse into administration, Yorkshire Post relays.

A spokesman, as cited by Yorkshire Post, said Aspire-Igen Ltd was
placed into administration in June with Joanne Hammond and Gareth
Rusling of Begbies Traynor appointed as joint administrators.  It
provided pre and post-16 education through GCSEs and study
programmes for vulnerable young people.

"As administrators, the role of Begbies Traynor is to investigate
the reasons the business has failed and maximise asset realisations
for the benefit of creditors.  The firm is unable to comment on the
ongoing provision of contracts the company was working on -- these
concerns should be addressed to the relevant authorities,"
Yorkshire Post quotes a spokesman as saying.

"The administrators anticipate that there may be sufficient funds
available to enable a dividend to be paid to unsecured creditors
from the administration estate."


BORDER STEELWORK: Enters Administration, 43 Jobs Affected
---------------------------------------------------------
BBC News reports that a cross-border construction firm has gone
into administration with the immediate loss of 43 jobs.

Border Steelwork Structures -- which was founded in 1978 -- has
offices in Annan and Carlisle.

Michelle Elliot and Simon Carvill-Biggs, partners with FRP
Advisory, have been appointed joint administrators, BBC relates.

According to BBC, they said unsustainable financial and cash-flow
issues due to a downturn in contracts and rising operational costs
had led to the situation.

The company has ceased trading and the joint administrators will
now market the business and assets for sale which includes plant,
machinery and a workshop in Annan, BBC discloses.


CHARNWOOD PAINT: Enters Administration Amid Trading Difficulties
----------------------------------------------------------------
Sam Metcalf at TheBusinessDesk.com reports that a Leicestershire
coatings company has collapsed into administration.

Charnwood Paint Specialists has called in Conrad Beighton and David
Griffiths of Leonard Curtis as joint administrators after a
troubled period of trading, TheBusinessDesk.com relates.

As TheBusinessDesk.com revealed earlier this month, Charnwood Paint
Specialists posted two notices of intention to appoint
administrators -- one at at the end of July and the second on Aug.
13.

At the end of January, the firm was subject of a winding up
petition from a company called InPlace Personnel Services, a
recruiter from Mansfield, TheBusinessDesk.com discloses.

According to the firm's latest available accounts, made up to the
end of July 2022, it employed an average of 20 people across the
year, TheBusinessDesk.com notes.


FARFETCH LIMITED: Fitch Affirms LongTerm IDR at B-, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Farfetch Limited's Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'B-'. The Outlook is Stable. Fitch has also
affirmed Farfetch US Holdings, Inc.'s term loan B's (TLB) senior
secured rating at 'BB-' with a Recovery Rating of 'RR1'. The
affirmation follows Farfetch's release of 1H23 results and the
USD200 million increase of the TLB.

Farfetch's 'B-' rating remains supported by its leading position in
the global e-commerce personal luxury market, where it is
well-placed to capture growth opportunities due to its established
and geographically diversified online marketplace platform.
However, the rating is constrained by a delay in profitability
improving due to disruption in selective luxury markets (US, China,
Russia). Its updated rating case assumes that EBITDAR will turn
neutral to positive in 2023 before improving strongly over
2024-2025. In its view, this path to profitability carries
execution risks and failure to deliver it could result in negative
rating pressure.

The Stable Outlook also reflects its expectations of sufficient
liquidity after the add-on placement to fund growth and Farfetch's
put option liabilities, should they be exercised in cash. The
company has some discretion over how to finance the exercise of the
put options but Fitch will treat higher-than-expected cash outflows
negatively in its analysis, especially if debt-funded.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Performance Below Expectations: Farfetch underperformed its
forecast in 2022 and 1H23 due to a higher fixed cost base, slower
working capital turnover and weaker demand recovery in China. Its
constant-currency revenue growth significantly decelerated to
single digits in 1H23, while Fitch-adjusted EBITDAR was negative at
USD99 million in 2022 and USD94 million in 1H23. Together with
material cash outflows under working capital and capex, this led to
the cash balance shrinking to USD454 million at end-June 2023 from
USD1.4 billion at end-2021.

Projected Profitability Improvement: The 'B' rating is predicated
on management's commitment to achieving sustained profitability.
Fitch assumes an improvement in growth, profitability and cash
generation from 2H23, reflecting the ramp-up of new partnerships,
ongoing cost-cutting initiatives and working capital management.
Fitch projects EBITDAR margin to increase to 4% in 2024 and to
above 10% in 2025 (2022: -4.3%), driven by growing economies of
scale, contribution from new partnerships, potentially including
certain Richemont brands and the investment in YNAP (in each case
subject to regulatory approval) and cost improvements.

Cost Reduction is Key: As Farfetch has lowered its revenue
guidance, Fitch views a reduction in general & administrative (G&A)
and R&D costs as key to deliver breakeven EBITDAR in 2023. In 2023,
Farfetch plans to cut these costs to USD800 million from USD850
million in 2022, despite business growth and ramp up of new
partnerships. Farfetch completed its initial cost-cutting plan by
1Q23 and introduced additional cost-saving initiatives in 2Q23,
including significant headcount reductions, revision of operational
footprint and exit from beauty business.

There was some reduction in G&A and technology costs in 1H23 but
Farfetch needs to make stronger progress in 2H23 to meet its
target. Inability to reduce costs would delay reaching a sustained
positive margin and would be detrimental to the 'B-' rating.

Inventory, Fashion Risks: Farfetch is exposed to fashion and
inventory risks due to its first-party sales, where it takes the
ownership of inventory. This results in cash flow volatility and
creates pressure on gross margin. In 1H23, the inventory position
was higher than expected and while Fitch expects stock levels to
reduce by end-2023, ongoing inventory clearance will weigh on gross
margin for Farfetch's In-Store and Brand Platform segments.

No Headroom for M&A, Dividends: Its rating case does not
incorporate cash payments for M&A or shareholder remuneration and
Fitch treats them as an event risk. Should this risk materialise,
it would create significant pressure on the rating. Farfetch's
liquidity is limited and Fitch estimates there is no headroom to
absorb such cash outflows, despite the recent USD200 million add-on
to its term loan.

Leading Market Position: The rating is supported by Farfetch's
position as a leading global platform for the luxury fashion
industry, underpinned by good geographical diversification and an
established presence in fast-growing markets. Farfetch's wide and
growing portfolio of leading global luxury brands creates
competitive strength, which together with sophisticated digital
infrastructure, enables the company to reach a global online
audience and ensure customer traffic. The platform is also equipped
to service third parties by providing tailored direct-to-consumer
solutions for luxury brand producers and retailers, underlining
Farfetch's strong in-house capabilities.

Platform Enabled by Technology: Fitch views Farfetch's in-house
digital e-commerce platform and owned well-invested and established
digital infrastructure as a fairly high barrier to new entrants
achieving similar competitive strength and scale. Fitch believes
Farfetch is also protected to some extent from competition from
online giants, like eBay and Amazon. These are mainly positioned
within the "mass-market" price category, while Farfetch mainly
appeals to customers as a one-stop marketplace destination for
major top and exclusive products and with a higher level of
customer service.

Enterprise Valuation Supports Financial Flexibility: Its rating
reflects that some of the intrinsic strengths in Farfetch's
business model are reflected in its enterprise value (EV) of USD2.7
billion, with access to equity adding to the group's financial
flexibility and the considerable equity cushion (debt/EV of about
60%) supporting its TLB recovery analysis.

Meaningful Execution Risks: Fitch sees high execution risks in
Farfetch's plan to scale up its business and achieve strong and
sustainable levels of profitability and free cash flow (FCF)
generation. In Fitch’s view, the path to profitability has been
already delayed not only due to external factors, such as exit from
Russia, FX headwinds and lockdowns in China, but also due some
weakness in implementation of the company's strategy. Fitch
reflects this in ESG Relevance Score of '4' for management
strategy.

Fitch continues to rely on management's commitment to reach USD10
billion in gross merchandise value (GMV) and around USD400 million
company-adjusted EBITDA by 2025. Delays in reaching this target may
lead to negative rating action, especially in light of approaching
senior secured debt maturity in 2027.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Farfetch is the leading global platform for the luxury fashion
industry and shares some traits with consumer goods and non-food
retail companies as it sells products online and through directly
operated retail stores. Fitch does not rate direct competitors of
Farfetch. However, Fitch has considered companies such as Golden
Goose S.p.A. (B+/Stable) and Birkenstock Financing S.a.r.l
(BB-/Stable) in the luxury shoes/sneakers space (versus Farfetch's
Stadium Goods), Levi Strauss & Co. (BB+/Stable) and Capri Holdings
Limited (BBB-/Rating Watch Negative) in the branded apparel space
(versus Farfetch's New Guards, Browns) and Amazon.com, Inc
(AA-/Stable) in the e-commerce space (versus Farfetch Marketplace)
for its analysis. All these are more mature businesses with proven
EBITDA and cash flow generation.

Fitch uses its Non-Food Retail Navigator to assess Farfetch,
similar to Amazon.com and Golden Goose. Fitch considered
lease-adjusted credit metrics for Farfetch due to its expansion of
leasehold store network.

Farfetch is rated two and three notches below Golden Goose and
Birkenstock, respectively. Both Golden Goose and Birkenstock have
strong EBITDAR margins (30%) and positive FCF, partially offset by
their product and supplier concentration. Birkenstock's higher
rating reflects its larger scale and product positioning that is
historically less subject to fashion risk.

Farfetch's credit profile is weaker than that of Levi's and Capri
Holdings, which are much larger in scale, enjoy good EBITDAR
margins and positive FCF while maintaining conservative leverage
metrics and financial policies.

Amazon.com is an investment-grade company with a global e-commerce
platform, significant scale, solid diversification in product and
geography, and conservative leverage.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer:

- High organic growth supplemented by ramp-up of new partnerships
with Ferragamo, Reebok and Neiman Marcus Group, with total gross
merchandise value increasing to USD6 billion in 2025 from USD4
billion in 2022 (excluding GMV from marketplace and platform
solutions services to Richemont brands and YNAP, which is subject
to regulatory approval)

- Regulatory approval of the YNAP transaction, with GMV from
marketplace and platform solutions services to Richemont brands and
YNAP contributing to Frafetch's revenue and profits from 2024

- EBITDAR turning positive in 2023 and trending to USD400 million
in 2025

- Sustained improvement in working capital management, leading to
inflows under working capital inflow over 2023-2025

- Capex of USD150 million-USD180 million a year over 2023-2026

- No dividends or new acquisitions to 2026

- Cash payments under put options not exceeding USD420 million for
2023-2026, noting that Farfetch has a discretion to settle in
Farfetch shares and cash

RECOVERY RATING ASSUMPTIONS

The recovery analysis assumes that Farfetch would be reorganised as
a going concern in bankruptcy rather than liquidated. Farfetch's GC
EBITDA is estimated at USD120 million. Fitch has used a 6.0x
enterprise vale to EBITDA multiple, which is in line with retail
and business services companies' distressed multiple, but that
reflects the strong growth fundamentals of Farfetch's business and
its market position.

Farfetch's USD600 million TLB (including the recent USD200 million
add-on), issued by Farfetch US Holdings, Inc. ranks ahead of the
USD1 billion unsecured convertible debt issued by Farfetch Limited.
Fitch assumes that the company may use inventory financing
facilities and therefore assume USD100 million of such debt ranking
ahead of senior secured TLB. The assumption mirrors the USD100
million inventory financing basket, which is allowed under
Farfetch's TLB agreement.

After deducting 10% for administrative claims, its principal
waterfall analysis generates a ranked recovery for the senior
secured debt, in the 'RR1' category, leading to a 'BB-' rating for
the TLB, three notches above the IDR. The waterfall analysis output
percentage based on metrics and assumptions is 91%.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

- Maturing business model, leading to EBITDAR margin above 5% on a
sustained basis

- Visibility of deleveraging trajectory with EBITDAR leverage below
6x on a sustained basis

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

- Liquidity shortfalls and insufficient resources to fund
operations or fulfil put options obligations over the next 18 to 24
months

- No visibility of EBITDAR reaching at least USD300 million by 2025
and FCF turning positive on a sustained basis

- Material debt-funded acquisitions, larger-than-expected payments
under put options or shareholder distribution, leading to erosion
of the cash position

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Limited Liquidity: Farfetch's liquidity is limited, despite the
cash balance of USD638 million at end-June 2023, proforma for net
proceeds from TLB add-on. This is because of negative FCF and
uncertainty about when it could turn positive. Its rating case also
assumes potential cash outlays related to exercise of put options
related to Farfetch China and Palm Angels in 2024 and 2026,
respectively, which Farfetch expects to settle in its shares.

ISSUER PROFILE

Farfetch is the global leading marketplace for personal luxury
fashion, including clothes and accessories, with an annual GMV of
USD4.1 billion in 2022.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Farfetch Limited has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Management
Strategy due to the company's aggressive financial policy in light
of its opportunistic M&A record, which has a negative impact on the
credit profile, and is relevant to the ratings in conjunction with
other factors.

Farfetch Limited has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Governance
Structure due to potential key-man risk associated with the
founder's close involvement in the company's operations and
strategy, which has a negative impact on the credit profile, and is
relevant to the ratings in conjunction with other factors.

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt             Rating          Recovery   Prior
   -----------             ------          --------   -----
Farfetch Limited      LT IDR B-  Affirmed                B-

Farfetch US
Holdings, Inc.

   senior secured     LT     BB- Affirmed    RR1        BB-

FARFETCH LTD: S&P Affirms 'B-' Long-Term ICR, Outlook Negative
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its long-term issuer credit rating on
online luxury fashion platform Farfetch Ltd. at 'B-', along with
the issue rating on the increased $600 million term loan B (TLB) at
'B-' with a recovery rating of '3'.

The negative outlook continues to reflect the risk of a potential
downgrade if the group stalls further on its ambitious growth plan,
strategic targets, and working capital optimization initiatives,
the delay of which could put pressure on liquidity and challenge
the sustainability of its capital structure.

Slowdown in demand for luxury personal goods in the U.S. and
longer-than-initially-expected recovery in China will harm the
group's performance over the next year. S&P said, "While we
continue to view the luxury sector as a resilient sector globally,
given its track record during periods of macroeconomic turbulence,
there are geographic differences. The macroeconomic environment and
pressure over discretionary income in the U.S. is expected to
hamper demand over the remainder of 2023 and potentially over the
first half of 2024. China's reopening and the projected recovery of
demand has been slower than initially expected, also affected by
the return to in-store shopping, making online purchasing less
attractive. These two major regional trends are expected to have a
significant impact on the group's performance in 2023 and the first
half of 2024. Nevertheless, we continue to view China as one of the
key drivers for growth for Farfetch, while the U.S. remains one of
the largest growth markets for the industry."

S&P said, "We expect a slower path to profitability and cash flow
generation with revenue up to $2.4 billion-$2.5 billion in 2023;
however, we continue to expect EBITDA to break even toward 2024.
The first half of 2023 has delivered subdued gross merchandise
value (GMV) (up 1% year on year to $2 billion) and adjusted revenue
generation (up 2%) as a result of the softer trading conditions
than previously anticipated, while persistently high levels of
inventory and receivables have led to working capital flows
remaining below expectations. We have reviewed our forecast, given
the latest guidance and the macroeconomic environment, and we now
expect slower GMV growth in 2023, totaling approximately $4.3
billion-$4.4 billion, versus $4.5 billion initially expected. We
expect this to translate into slower revenue expansion. But the
strong cost savings initiatives, including reduction in demand
generation spend, should still allow the group to break even in
2024 as initially forecast. However, we continue to expect free
operating cash flow (FOCF) after leases to remain negative until
2025-2026 on the back of slower-than-expected results on working
capital management initiatives. The group continues its stock
clearance efforts; however, the recent launch of the partnership
with Reebok contributed to a further increase in inventory. We
acknowledge management's ambitions to continue improving its stock
position during the second half of 2023, such as targeted discounts
and lower new order volumes. In addition, collection of value-added
tax receivables has been slower than initially anticipated, and we
expect most of these to be converted to cash only within the next
12 months.

Despite slower cash generation, the $200 million add-on to the
existing TLB supports the company's adequate liquidity position.The
group has recently issued a $200 million fungible add-on to the TLB
that was issued in October 2022 to enhance liquidity that has been
overshadowed by the delay in delivering some of its key performance
metrics. We expect liquidity to remain adequate, with sources
covering uses by more than 1.2x, despite the large working capital
swings during the year. We expect Farfetch to finish 2023 with
approximately $700 million of cash thanks to the partial working
capital unwind and $181 million of net proceeds from the add-on,
which we anticipate will largely offset EBITDA losses and cover
capital spending (capex) requirements."

The negative outlook reflects the risk of a potential downgrade if
the group stalls on its path to profitability and positive cash
generation because of macroeconomic pressures or execution hurdles
in its strategic initiatives, especially improvement in working
capital and overall cash generation. It also reflects the risk of a
downgrade if the group is not able to maintain adequate liquidity
at all times. In S&P's base case, it forecasts breakeven S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA in 2024 and breakeven FOCF after leases in
2025-2026, while liquidity sources will continue covering uses by
at least 1.2x on a forward-looking 12-month basis.

S&P said, "We could lower our rating within the next six to 12
months if Farfetch is not able to maintain its adequate liquidity
as a result of inability to unwind its current elevated inventories
and receivables positions during the second half of 2023 and
stabilize the working capital requirements in absence of additional
liquidity sources. We could also downgrade Farfetch if we forecast
further delays on the path to achieving positive adjusted EBITDA or
FOCF after leases, or if the negative FOCF after leases consumes
more cash than we forecast in our base case, raising the risk of
the group's capital structure becoming unsustainable.

"We could revise the outlook to stable over the next 12 months if
the group addresses its working capital management by sustainably
reducing volatility and the net investment from its current
elevated level, thereby bolstering its liquidity position. A
further positive rating action would depend on the group
maintaining adequate liquidity to withstand operating headwinds at
all times and on the successful delivery of its profitable growth
strategy, supporting a consistent improvement in operating
performance and achieving positive EBITDA and breakeven FOCF after
lease payments ahead of our base case."


GREENSILL CAPITAL: IAG Australia Reports US$4.5-Bil. Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------
Nic Fildes and Ian Smith at The Financial Times report that
Insurance Australia Group, the Sydney-based insurer embroiled in
litigation over the collapse of finance company Greensill Capital,
has said it has 20 claims with an aggregate value of A$7 billion
(US$4.5 billion) related to the cases.

The insurer is one of a number of such groups, including Tokio
Marine and Zurich, that have refused to pay out on Greensill's
credit cover, the FT discloses.

Sydney-based IAG, which detailed the aggregate figure for the first
time in its annual report on Aug. 21, faces multiple Australian
legal cases from investors in Greensill-sourced debts, the FT
notes.

Greensill had arranged trade credit insurance through Bond & Credit
Co -- the underwriting agency in which IAG formerly had a 50% stake
-- to cover contracts in case of default, according to the FT.  By
its end, Greensill had US$10 billion of insurance arranged by BCC
covering the debts it packaged up for investors, the FT states.

IAG has previously denied it has any "net" exposure to the BCC
policies signed with Greensill Capital and Greensill Bank, saying
it passed this to Tokio Marine, which bought the BCC unit in 2019.

Still, the Australian insurer has set aside A$467 million to cover
legal fees and claims handling related to the cases, according to
its report, the FT notes.

In response to IAG's report, Japan's Tokio Marine issued a
statement reiterating its position that Greensill's insurance was
void from inception and that it "does not currently anticipate any
material impact" on its finances from Greensill-related claims, the
FT relates.

Australia's federal court is expected to start formal proceedings
on a series of insurance claims from Greensill creditors in the
coming months, the FT states.

Greensill was a supply-chain lending company led by Lex Greensill
and advised by former UK prime minister David Cameron.  The company
collapsed two years ago after its insurance expired, sparking a
political and financial scandal, the FT recounts.

According to the FT, IAG has said in its legal filings that it is
not bound by the policies signed between BCC and Greensill as the
cover agreed was in breach of limits set on the unit.  It has also
argued that if it is deemed to be bound by the disputed BCC
policies, it is not liable for the sums sought by creditors.

Investment companies including Credit Suisse and White Oak have
challenged the insurers' arguments that the policies are invalid in
legal filings, according to the FT.

The insurer, as cited by the FT, said it would take "a number of
years" to resolve the outstanding litigation and that it was also
managing claims issued by BCC unrelated to the Greensill policies.

IAG added that if the court ruled it had to pay out on the
insurance, it would rely on the 2019 agreement to pass the credit
insurance exposure to Tokio Marine.  However, IAG warned that those
agreements could also be challenged, the FT notes.


PINNACLE BIDCO: Fitch Affirms LongTerm IDR at 'B-', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Pinnacle Bidco's plc (Pure Gym)
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B-' with a Stable
Outlook.

The 'B-' IDR reflects the group's high leverage, weak fixed charge
cover ratios, and negative post-capex free cash flow (FCF), which
are balanced by its leading market positions in the UK and Denmark
in the value gym segment. Pure Gym's rating is exposed to gradually
increasing refinancing risk related to its February 2025 notes
maturity, which could lead to negative rating pressure if not
addressed 12-15 months before the debt comes due. Its high
financial leverage has also been partly offset by materially
improved liquidity following a capital raise in January 2022, which
Fitch believes should support anticipated debt refinancing.

The Stable Outlook reflects its expectations of continued profit
expansion that should enable deleveraging, satisfactory liquidity
and capex flexibility, although Fitch incorporates slower expansion
than in its previous forecast following slower expansion in 2023.
Based on its current rating case, Fitch sees limited near-term
rating headroom, and would view any deterioration in the group's
performance over the next few quarters as negative for the ratings,
particularly in light of the upcoming debt maturities.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Slower EBITDA Growth: Fitch expects slower EBITDA growth to nearly
GBP150 million by 2026 than under its previous rating case (over
GBP200 million). This is due to a more prudent and halved expansion
rate of around 215 new sites addition by 2026. Fitch forecasts
GBP24 million improvement in EBITDA in 2023, following a strong
1Q23 performance with 12% growth in members yoy in this important
period. Fitch-calculated EBITDA of GBP72 million in 2022 is after
rents and is not adjusted for certain items that the company
includes. Trading in 2H22 was affected by fewer new members in the
key September 2022 period.

High leverage: Fitch expects a more gradual reduction in leverage
due to slower growth in profits. Fitch forecasts EBITDAR gross
leverage at 8.5x in 2023, which will exceed the negative
sensitivity, reducing to within rating guidelines in 2024. Fitch
believes the underlying business is cash-generative and has the
potential to deleverage towards 7.0x by 2026 as profits grow due to
ramp up of existing sites and new sites start contributing to
profits.

Membership Growth: Fitch models growth in memberships to follow a
normal cycle with key net addition periods in January and
September, rather than expecting post-pandemic recovery for a
like-for-like (LFL) portfolio by a certain date. Fitch expects
average members per gym in the UK to slightly increase in 2024,
then decline due to new gym additions and changes in the site mix,
and do not expect it to reach pre-pandemic levels. Pure Gym
reported LFL membership count for UK sites (opened before 2018)
remained 13% below pre-pandemic level in 1Q23, with revenue now
recovered amid improved average revenue per member (ARPM). This is
slightly ahead of its closest peer, The Gym Group.

High Refinancing Risk: In Fitch’s view, refinancing risk is high
and will weigh on Pure Gym's rating as maturity of its notes in
February 2025 approaches. Its forecast incorporates refinancing at
a somewhat higher interest rate than the current around 6%
effective interest rate, leading to slightly weaker coverage
metrics albeit still aligned with the rating, and a weaker funds
from operations (FFO) margin. Refinancing at higher than its
modelled rate, which will depend on market conditions and investor
appetite, could suppress the margin further and be negative for the
rating.

Low Cost Business: Fitch anticipates the EBITDAR margin will
recover to 40% by 2025, instead of 43% previously, due to slower
growth and somewhat lower average members per site. The low-cost
business model with caps and collars on rents and forward contract
on energy partially protect the group from cost inflation eroding
profitability.

Execution Risk in Expansion: Its rating case sees some execution
risk associated with around new 190 gym openings assumed for
2023-2026 in the UK. Fitch sees a risk of over-expansion in the
sector, especially if other gym operators follow suit, even if
demand trends appear favourable for expansion. This is somewhat
mitigated by weakened competition post-pandemic and Pure Gym's
record of opening and ramping up new sites. Fitch incorporates
increased average capex per site of around GBP1.2 million.

Value Offering: Fitch expects Pure Gym's value business model to
perform better in a recessionary environment than traditional
peers. This is because its monthly fees are materially lower than
traditional private operators and Pure Gym has no membership
contracts with notice periods. Fitch believes this provides Pure
Gym with a competitive advantage as consumers seek lower-cost
propositions. The business model is strengthened by Pure Gym's
variable pricing model, which allows flexibility for margin
preservation while competing with local peers.

Growing Value-Gym Market: The IDR reflects Pure Gym's leading
position in the value-gym market, which Fitch expects to continue
to grow. Fitch believes the group is well-positioned to benefit
from a renewed focus on health & wellbeing trends post-pandemic.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Pure Gym generally operates on higher EBITDAR margins than the
median for Fitch-rated gym operators, including those within its
food, non-food retail and leisure credit opinion portfolios, due to
its scale and a value/low-cost business model. However, due to its
accelerated expansion programme and slower member growth, Fitch
does not expect Pure Gym's profitability to exceed the industry
average over its forecast period. Pure Gym has been taking market
share mainly from its mid-market peers, due to the competitive
nature of its pricing structure.

Fitch views Pure Gym's forecast total adjusted debt/ operating
EBITDAR at 7.8x by end-2024 as high, but in line with that of
similar leisure credits in the low 'B' rating category. Negative
FCF amid an expansion strategy restricts the IDR. However, Pure
Gym's cash flow conversion and deleveraging capability is
structurally better than for high-street retailers, and is now
further enhanced by equity-funded capex.

Pure Gym is rated one notch below its closest Fitch-rated peer,
Deuce Midco Limited (David Lloyd Leisure, DLL; B/Stable), the
premium lifestyle club operator. Pure Gym has a more aggressive
expansion strategy, which carries higher execution risk than for
DLL, resulting in expected weaker FCF generation and higher
leverage. Following the accelerated expansion to be funded by
equity injection, Fitch expects Pure Gym's leverage to reach around
7.0x by 2026, three years later than DLL under its capital
structure.

Pure Gym has mildly higher profitability than DLL with EBITDAR
margin trending towards 41% due to its low-cost business model,
versus around 37% at DLL.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions within its Rating Case for the Issuer:

- Average memberships for 2023 at around 1.8 million (11% higher
than average 2022 levels) and gradually increasing to 2.3 million
by 2026, benefitting from new gym openings and the ramp-up of new
gyms

- Around 40 corporate-owned new gym openings in 2023, followed by
around 175 new gyms in 2024-2026 (50 in 2024, 55 in 2025, and 70 in
2026) and 27 gym closures between 2023 and 2026 in Denmark

- Average members per gym post-2023 gradually declining to reflect
the ramp-up of new gym openings and smaller format boxes with lower
capacities

- ARPM gradually increasing to GBP24.6 by 2026 from GBP23.7 in
2022

- Sales CAGR of 9% in 2023-2026, supported by increasing ARPM, new
site openings and the ramp-up of new sites

- EBITDAR margin recovering to around 38.6% by 2023, and gradually
nearing 41% by 2026, supported by increase in scale, maturation of
newly-opened gyms, margin improvement efforts in Denmark and
contribution from franchise sites

- Fitch-derived EBITDA includes a GBP9 million negative impact from
of its lease treatment against cash lease cost (lease costs
calculated as the sum of right-of-use asset depreciation and P&L
interest cost; the difference for the forecast period of 2023-2026
is expected to narrow)

- Average capex at around GBP115 million per year between 2023 and
2026 to fund new site openings and refurbishment projects

- No dividends and no acquisitions to 2026

Key Recovery Rating Assumptions: The recovery analysis assumes that
Pure Gym would be reorganised as a going-concern (GC) in bankruptcy
rather than liquidated. Fitch has assumed a 10% administrative
claim.

The GC EBITDA estimate reflects Fitch's view of a sustainable,
post-reorganisation EBITDA level upon which Fitch bases the
valuation of the group.

Pure Gym's GC EBITDA of GBP110 million is based on Fitch-projected
EBITDA in 2024, reflecting the ramp up of existing sites as well as
contribution from new site openings by 2024. This reflects
competitive dynamics, which are partly offset by a broadly
resilient format given its lower price point but lack of
contracts.

The current Fitch-distressed enterprise value (EV)/EBITDA multiples
for other gym operators in the 'B' rating category have been around
5x-6x. Fitch recognises that Pure Gym has a leading share in the
growing value-gym market, which justifies a 5.5x multiple, although
Pure Gym currently does not have any unique characteristics that
would allow for a higher multiple, such as a significant unique
brand, material franchise revenue or undervalued real-estate
assets.

The GBP145 million RCF, which ranks super-senior to the senior
secured notes, is assumed to be fully drawn upon default.

After deducting 10% for administrative claims, its principal
waterfall analysis generates a ranked recovery for the senior
secured debt, in the 'RR4' category, leading to a 'B-' rating for
the bonds. The waterfall analysis output percentage based on
current metrics and assumptions is 47% (unchanged).

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade (to B):

Growth in membership numbers and revenue from mature sites and
maturing new sites, while continuing to control cost, leading to:

- (Fitch-defined EBITDA minus interest and operational cash
expenses)/revenue (previously known as FFO margin) trending to 10%

- EBITDAR fixed charge coverage above 1.5x on a sustained basis

- Total EBITDAR leverage below 7.5x

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade (to CCC+):

- Lack of progress on refinancing 12-15 months before material debt
maturities or refinancing at materially higher interest rates,
leading to EBITDAR fixed charge coverage below 1.2x

- Loss of revenue and decline in profitability due to economic
weakness, increased competition and pressure on pricing leading to
(Fitch defined EBITDA minus interest and operational cash expenses)
/ revenue (previously known as FFO margin) consistently below 10%

- Total EBITDAR leverage remaining above 8.0x on a sustained basis

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Comfortable Liquidity: Following the GBP300 million equity
injection in January 2022, Fitch views Pure Gym's liquidity as
comfortable, supported by GBP235 million cash on sheet balance (of
which GBP30 million is held at the parent entity) at end-2022 and
full availability under the GBP145 million RCF. Fitch expects that
cash on hand including the proceeds from the equity injection
together with internally generated cash flows will be more than
sufficient to fund Pure Gym's accelerated expansion strategy in
2023-2024.

Fitch projects FCF to stay negative, driven by higher capex needs
related to the number of gym openings and gym refurbishments and
despite EBITDA expansion on new gym openings and the maturation of
newly-opened gyms.

The group has extended the maturity of the RCF to January 2025,
similar to that of the existing GBP430 million and EUR490 million
senior secured notes due in February 2025.

ISSUER PROFILE

Pure Gym is a leading low-cost gym operator in Europe with around
560 sites across UK, Denmark and Switzerland (as of March 2023).

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.

   Entity/Debt              Rating         Recovery   Prior
   -----------              ------         --------   -----
Pinnacle Bidco plc     LT IDR B-  Affirmed              B-

   super senior        LT     BB- Affirmed   RR1       BB-

   senior secured      LT     B-  Affirmed   RR4        B-

PLATFORM BIDCO: GBP417.5MM Bank Debt Trades at 18% Discount
-----------------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Platform Bidco Ltd
is a borrower were trading in the secondary market around 81.6
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, August 18, 2023,
according to Bloomberg's Evaluated Pricing service data.

The GBP417.5 million facility is a Term loan that is scheduled to
mature on September 23, 2028.  About GBP258.1 million of the loan
is withdrawn and outstanding.

Platform Bidco Ltd is a UK entity incorporated in April 2021 to
acquire Valeo Foods Group Ltd, an Irish-headquartered producer and
distributor of branded and non-branded ambient food products. The
Company’s country of domicile is the United Kingdom.


TRENCH NETWORKS: Bought Out of Administration via Pre-Pack Deal
---------------------------------------------------------------
Business Sale reports that Trench Networks, a provider of Wi-Fi
services at construction sites, has been acquired out of
administration in a pre-pack deal.

The company, which is based in Hebburn having relocated from its
previous base in Cramlington, has been acquired by Northern
Telecommunications, Business Sale discloses.

The company specialises in providing remote internet access at
sites that otherwise lack Wi-Fi infrastructure.  However, following
the collapse of several regional contractors in the local
construction sector, including Metnor and Tolent, the company lost
several sites that it was working on, Business Sale relates.

As a result, the company faced cash flow issues, including a rising
level of bad debt and a loss of turnover, Business Sale states.
Faced with restricted cash flow and arrears to creditor, the
company acted swiftly to appoint insolvency experts FRP Advisory,
Business Sale notes.

According to Business Sale, joint administrator and FRP partner
Andrew Haslam said that Trench Networks director Kevin Lattimer had
sought advice at an early stage, meaning the administrators had
"lots of options to consider rather than seeking professional
advice at the eleventh hour."

Mr. Haslam continued: "Because of this early engagement, it allowed
a marketing exercise to be undertaken which prompted significant
interest in the business.

"Ultimately, a trade purchaser was identified and a contract
negotiated to sell the business and rescue the staff.  This is a
positive result and we hope that the purchaser can take the
business forward and expand on the success of the founders."

VUE INTERNATIONAL: Lord Abbett CB Marks $9.2MM Loan at 43% Off
--------------------------------------------------------------
Lord Abbett Corporate Bond Fund has marked its $9,223,893 loan
extended to Vue International Bidco PLC to market at $5,274,791 or
57% of the outstanding amount, as of May 31, 2023, according to
Lord Abbett CB's semi-annual report on Form N-CSR for the period
from December 1, 2022 to May 31, 2023, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.

Lord Abbett CB is a participant in a 2023 EUR Payment in Kind Term
Loan 6.50% to Vue International Bidco PLC. The loan accrues
interest at a rate of 4.86% (6 mo. EUR EURIBOR + 2%) per annum. The
loan matures on December 31, 2027.

Lord Abbett Investment Trust is registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end
management investment company and was organized as a Delaware
statutory trust on August 16, 1993. The Trust currently consists of
14 funds as of May 31, 2023. The semi-annual report covers 12 of
the funds namely: Lord Abbett Convertible Fund, Lord Abbett Core
Fixed Income Fund, Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund, Lord Abbett
Corporate Bond Fund, Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund, Lord Abbett
High Yield Fund, Lord Abbett Income Fund, Lord Abbett Inflation
Focused Fund, Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund, Lord
Abbett Total Return Fund, Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund.

Vue International Bidco PLC operates movie theaters worldwide. The
Company's country of domicile is the United Kingdom.


VUE INTERNATIONAL: Lord Abbett HY Marks EUR1.2MM Loan at 55% Off
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund has marked its EUR1,196,824 loan
extended to Vue International Bidco PLC to market at EUR538,571 or
45% of the outstanding amount, as of May 31, 2023, according to
Lord Abbett HY's semi-annual report on Form N-CSR for the period
from December 1, 2022 to May 31, 2023, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.

Lord Abbett HY is a participant in a 2023 EUR Payment In Kind Term
Loan 6.50% to Vue International Bidco PLC. The loan matures on
December 31, 2027.

Lord Abbett Investment Trust is registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end
management investment company and was organized as a Delaware
statutory trust on August 16, 1993. The Trust currently consists of
14 funds as of May 31, 2023. The semi-annual report covers 12 of
the funds namely: Lord Abbett Convertible Fund, Lord Abbett Core
Fixed Income Fund, Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund, Lord Abbett
Corporate Bond Fund, Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund, Lord Abbett
High Yield Fund, Lord Abbett Income Fund, Lord Abbett Inflation
Focused Fund, Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund, Lord
Abbett Total Return Fund, Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund.

Vue International Bidco PLC operates movie theaters worldwide.  The
Company's country of domicile is the United Kingdom.  



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2023.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *