/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/230615.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Thursday, June 15, 2023, Vol. 24, No. 120

                           Headlines



C R O A T I A

[*] CROATIA: Insolvent Companies Expected to Rise by 10% in 2023


F R A N C E

CONCERT'O: Creditors Urged to Vote Against Proposed Restructuring


G R E E C E

DANAOS CORP: S&P Raises ICR to 'BB+', Outlook Stable


I R E L A N D

BLACKROCK EUROPEAN XIV: S&P Assigns B- Rating on Cl. F Notes


I T A L Y

TELECOM ITALIA: KKR Offers to Raise Bid for Landline Grid


S P A I N

FONCAIXA FTGENCAT 5: Moody's Affirms C Rating on EUR26.5MM D Notes


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS: Moody's Rates New Hybrid Notes 'Ba1'
CINEWORLD: To File for Administration as Part of Restructuring
INEOS ENTERPRISES: Moody's Rates New EUR650MM Secured Loan 'Ba3'
MB AEROSPACE II: Moody's Raises CFR to Caa1, On Further Review
RAWDON ASSET: Director Gets 7-Year Sentence for Fraud

[*] UK: Scotland Reports Biggest Rise in Business Insolvencies

                           - - - - -


=============
C R O A T I A
=============

[*] CROATIA: Insolvent Companies Expected to Rise by 10% in 2023
----------------------------------------------------------------
Annie Tsoneva at SeeNews reports that Austrian credit insurance
company Acredia and international trade credit insurer Allianz
Trade expect that the number of insolvent companies in Croatia will
rise by around 10% to some 6,000 this year, Acredia said on June
13.

"We see insolvency increasing particularly in construction and
retail.  Problems of the supply chains have been resolved to some
extent and inflation is gradually easing, but the lack of workforce
still persists," SeeNews quotes Acredia board member Michael Kolb
as saying in a press release.

High energy prices and tight financial market are other main
reasons for concern for Croatian companies, he added, SeeNews
notes.

The number of insolvent companies in Croatia rose 9.8% last year,
SeeNews relays, citing data from the country's statistical office.
In the first quarter of this year alone, 1,428 companies filed for
bankruptcy in the Adriatic country, SeeNews discloses.

Acredia said on a global level, following an increase of 17% in the
number of insolvent companies last year, this year their number is
expected to rise by 21%, SeeNews relates.




===========
F R A N C E
===========

CONCERT'O: Creditors Urged to Vote Against Proposed Restructuring
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Support Club, comprised of investors with combined AUM of over
$62 billion and holding EUR497 million of Orpea's unsecured claims,
urge other creditors to vote against the proposed restructuring and
stealth nationalization of France's largest health care provider on
June 16.  

They argue the proposal tramples on EUR1.9 billion of unsecured
creditors who are not supporting the plan, arbitrarily favors and
enriches the French State's investment vehicle Caisse des depots et
consignations (the CDC) and certain (primarily French) creditors
over most others and threatens France's sustainability for foreign
investments.  Instead, they call on Orpea to engage with the
Support Club and other stakeholders, and to consider an alternative
restructuring proposal by Concert'O, which has been ignored by
Orpea and its favored creditors to date.  Concert'O's proposal
delivers better value to stakeholders, equivalent to a 35% day-1
recovery on unsecured creditors' claims over CDC's proposal and
offers all shareholders the chance to participate in Orpea's future
value creation.

In the event the creditor classes don't vote in favor of the plan,
the Support Club anticipates the French state will pursue a cross
class cram down via the Board of Orpea, a group of French banks,
and the CDC.  This would force all creditors to give economics in
Orpea to the CDC at a significant undervaluation (take a haircut).
This should not be sanctioned without the consent of all classes
and the group argues it would breach at least two French laws.
Firstly, nationalization has to follow due process to maximize the
value of the company; Concert'O and the Support Club have been
willing to put in more euros for less equity, but their proposal
has been ignored by Orpea's Board. Secondly, other creditors, under
pre-emption rights, should have the opportunity -- enshrined in
French law -- to subscribe to any equitization, which so far they
have been denied.  In the case of a cross-class cram down, the
Support Club argues it and the other unsecured creditors should be
allowed to subscribe to the second capital increase.

Orpea's unsecured creditors are being made three times the victim
in this case.  First, Orpea was operationally and financially
mis-managed leading to a financial restructuring in the summer of
2022.  Secondly, in the 2022 restructuring, the Company did not
even consult its unsecured creditors and instead favored a group of
overwhelmingly French banks to their detriment.  Now, for the third
time, unsecured creditors are being treated unfairly.

From the very beginning and throughout the process, the Board of
Orpea has issued misleading statements on the progress of, and
support for, the restructuring.  Most concerning of which, the
Board claimed to have reached an agreement on the restructuring
with 'about 50%' of the unsecured creditors of Orpea, when this
cannot have been the case.

Members of the Support Club are currently taking legal steps before
the French and German Courts to challenge the two-step actions of
Orpea to give preferred status to a group of secured creditors
(French banks) and then to unfairly sweeten the deal for some but
not all unsecured creditors.  They hold a blocking position in the
convertible bonds and are also seeking to vote down the proposed
restructuring through the French safeguard process.  Without
broader resistance by creditors and shareholders, the Support Club
is concerned that unfavored creditors will be crammed-down and
deprived of rightful value, which will instead accrue to French
creditors and the CDC, which will take the company by stealth.

The Support Club says: "The flagrant disregard and refusal for
months to engage on any alternative restructuring proposal,
particularly one which is more favorable to all Orpea's
stakeholders, and the unwillingness of Orpea's Board to consider
it, forces one to question France's desire to be seen as a suitable
and safe destination for foreign investment.  France has recently
enacted a new bankruptcy law which is meant to implement a European
directive aimed at encouraging cross-border investments by reducing
inconsistencies between insolvency rules across the region.  The
Orpea restructuring plan sets a terrible precedent for unsecured
creditor treatment as the first major case under the new law.  We
do not want to see France go in the same direction as other nation
states which have egregiously ignored creditor rights.  Following
Brexit, Europe is supposed to be open for business, but this
attempt at stealth nationalization of a privately owned and
financed care provider, which was and remains a viable profitable
business, gives a contrary message.

"The care home sector will require a huge amount of private
investment and debt financing in the years ahead to support an
aging population in France and Europe, and the Board and CDC's
attempts to force a cross-class cram down are harmful to investor
confidence.

"We strongly urge all creditors to vote against the restructuring
cooked up by the French-state backed investor CDC and the Board of
Orpea on June 16. Furthermore, we are pursuing legal options to
litigate the matter."

                     About Support Club

The Support Club is a group of funds managed by Fortress Investment
Group, Kite Lake Capital, Kyma Capital, LMR Partners and Whitebox
Advisors who are unsecured creditors of Orpea SA (a French
healthcare provider), representing EUR497 million of Orpea's
unsecured claims and managing over $62 billion in AUM.

Support Club's financial advisor is Gleacher Shacklock LLP, and
French legal advice is provided by Lantourne & Associes.




===========
G R E E C E
===========

DANAOS CORP: S&P Raises ICR to 'BB+', Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its long-term issuer credit and issue
ratings on Marshall Islands-registered containership owner and
charterer Danaos Corp. and its unsecured notes to 'BB+' from 'BB'.
The recovery rating remains 3, indicating meaningful recovery in
the event of default (rounded estimate 65%).

The stable outlook reflects that Danaos' adjusted FFO to debt ratio
will remain above 50% due to its medium-term time charter (T/C)
profile and prudent financial policy.

S&P said, "The correction in charter rates has been faster and
steeper than we expected, but we still think average T/C rates will
remain profitable. Global container shipping boomed during the
second half of 2020, throughout 2021, and into the first half of
2022, with tonnage providers (such as Danaos) and container liners
posting record results. Then consumer durables saw a dip in demand,
maritime ports were less congested, and in September-October 2022,
container shipping rates crashed after a year and a half of
unprecedented highs. The Clarksons Average Containership Earnings
index stood at around $26,400 per day on June 2, 2023, down from
its average of $85,700 per day in the first half of 2022 and
$50,800 per day in 2021, but still above its pre-pandemic average
of $13,700 in 2019. We believe rates will remain under pressure in
2023 and 2024 given the hefty new vessel deliveries, in addition to
growing uncertainty about freight volumes. Accelerating
containership supply growth on the back of the currently sizable
orderbook (accounting for close to 30% of the total global fleet
compared with an all-time low of 8% in October 2020, according to
Clarkson Research) will likely surpass demand growth in the coming
quarters. That said, we believe container liners (Danaos'
customers) will implement capacity containing measures and manage
excess supply with tested tools such as blank sailings, slow
steaming, rerouting, swift capacity reallocation, and perhaps
potential deferral of new vessel deliveries. Accordingly, in our
base case we assume that average T/C rates over 2023-2025 will
ultimately stabilize at profitable levels.

"We anticipate Danaos will likely repeat its strong cash flow
performance in 2023, despite the normalizing charter rates. We
expect Danaos to report another strong performance in 2023,
although softer than its record-high adjusted EBITDA of about $770
million. Our base case includes 2023 EBITDA of up to $705 million
(compared with an adjusted average EBITDA of about $315 million per
year over 2017-2020), as we think the company will continue to
benefit from the benign charter rate environment that the shipping
industry witnessed over 2021-2022. This is because Danaos locked in
multi-year, noncancellable charter contracts at favorable fixed
rates with global leading liner companies. However, we believe this
level of EBITDA is not sustainable over the medium term, as the
charter contracts will gradually be up for renewal at likely lower
rates than in the current agreements. In May 2023, Danaos had an
average remaining charter duration of 3.2 years, and its contracted
revenue backlog was $2.3 billion. Its contracted vessel operating
days coverage remains high at 98% for 2023, 84% for 2024, and 51%
for 2025. This provides a certain amount of earnings visibility for
the next couple of years and partly insulates the company from the
industry's above-average underlying volatility, assuming its
customers deliver on their commitments, which is our base case."

Strong operating results and modest debt levels will help Danaos
maintain its FFO to debt ratio of at least 50%. Danaos' strong cash
flow generation and asset disposals in 2022, including vessel sales
of about $130 million and the disposal of its stake in container
liner ZIM for about $247 million, allowed the company to materially
reduce its debt. This enhanced Danaos' financial flexibility and
headroom under its credit metrics ahead of EBITDA normalization
from the peak level in 2022-2023. Danaos was able to more than
halve its debt to about $500 million reported at the end of 2022
from over $1.3 billion in 2021. At the same time, its discretionary
spending, such as shareholder remuneration, was modest--$61 million
paid in dividends and $30 million in share repurchases. S&P said,
"We understand this was in line with the company's general capital
allocation policy with management prioritizing debt reduction and
liquidity build up, ahead of investing into fleet and shareholder
returns, which we view positively. The debt reduction ahead of our
expectations, combined with strong EBITDA, led to a solid FFO to
debt ratio of over 130% for 2022. We expect this ratio to further
improve in 2023 as Danaos prepaid its finance leases in April 2023
and as the remaining debt amortizes and reaches over 150% before it
will start trending down, as Danaos will likely incur new debt to
make final payments for new vessels on order in 2024."

Danaos' ability and willingness to preserve ample liquidity as
protection against operational adversities remains a key
consideration in our view of its credit profile. Danaos has
preserved a solid cash on hand position (about $360 million at
end-March 2023 and $268 million at year-end 2022) even after
material debt redemption and some shareholder returns in 2022. In
addition, it secured a $383 million revolving credit facility,
currently undrawn and available until 2027. S&P believes this
points to management's willingness to secure liquidity protection
as more vessels come for charter renewals. Despite some positive
structural changes in the wider industry since the last
downturn--such as more disciplined capacity management -- the
container shipping industry will remain tied to cyclical
supply-demand conditions and vulnerable to low-probability,
high-impact events, which typically depress utilization and charter
rates. Industry downturns in recent years prompted high-profile
financial restructurings and defaults of liner companies that
charter Danaos' vessels, such as ZIM and HMM. S&P therefore views
Danaos' prudent liquidity management as critical to the 'BB+'
rating.

The company's current longer charter profile when compared to
historic durations, as well as the improved credit quality of its
counterparties, should protect Danaos' EBITDA against the abrupt
and sharp charter rate corrections in late 2022. S&P said, "We
believe Danaos' current medium-term T/C profile, underpinned by
attractive rates, partly shields the company from the industry's
cyclical swings. We understand the charter profile consists of
fully noncancellable and fixed-rate contracts." Furthermore, Danaos
benefits from good operating efficiency and predictable operating
costs, with no exposure to volatile bunker fuel prices and other
voyage expenses, which typically under T/C agreements are borne by
counterparties. That said, Danaos remains exposed to volatile
container shipping charter rates, in particular in the event of the
counterparty's nonperformance on charter agreements or default.
Consequently, Danaos' cash flow generation prospects are
susceptible to counterparties'/container liners' financial capacity
and willingness to deliver on their commitments. That said, Danaos'
customers, among others container liners we rate--CMA CGM S.A.,
Hapag-Lloyd AG, and A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S--have improved their
free operating cash flow and liquidity, and reduced debt, resulting
in stronger credit metrics and upgrades in 2021-2022.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Danaos'
adjusted FFO to debt ratio will remain above 50% in the next 12
months due to largely contracted revenues and a prudent financial
policy.

"We could lower the rating if Danaos' earnings unexpectedly
weakened due to a significant deterioration in charter rate
conditions, resulting in adjusted FFO to debt dropping sustainably
below 50%." Rating pressure would also arise if container liners'
credit quality appeared to significantly weaken unexpectedly,
increasing the risk of amendments to existing contracts, delayed
payments, or nonpayment under the charter agreements.

A negative rating action could also follow any unexpected
deviations in financial policy, for example, if we believe the
company is pursuing significant and largely debt-funded investments
in additional tonnage or aggressive shareholder distributions,
which would depress credit metrics.

Although unlikely in the short term, S&P could upgrade Danaos if
the company strengthened its business profile, for example, by
materially increasing its scale and scope of operations. This would
need to be further supported by its conclusion that the fundamental
risk characteristics of the underlying container shipping industry
have improved, while Danaos maintains its adjusted FFO to debt
above 50%. An upgrade would also require adherence to a prudent
financial policy to ensure this ratio level is sustainable and an
ample liquidity cushion.

ESG credit indicators: E-3, S-2, G-2

Environmental factors remain a moderately negative consideration in
S&P's credit rating analysis of Danaos, as the global shipping
industry faces a large regulatory workload. This is reflected in
increasingly stringent shipping emission targets, fluctuating and
demanding capital investments, for example in new vessels powered
by alternative fuels and the use of more expensive
emissions-compliant bunkers. That said, the company typically
transfers the risk of fuel price inflation to counterparties via
T/C contracts, which stipulate that the charterer pays for a ship's
running costs. Danaos' management aims over time to replace aging
containerships with new ones equipped with more fuel-efficient
engines. It is also enhancing its energy efficiency and cutting
emissions, including via bulbous bow optimization, propeller
retrofits, and low friction paints. The company has also installed
exhaust cleaning systems (scrubbers) on 11 of its vessels without
significantly weakening its financial flexibility over 2019-2020.




=============
I R E L A N D
=============

BLACKROCK EUROPEAN XIV: S&P Assigns B- Rating on Cl. F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its credit ratings to BlackRock
European CLO XIV DAC's class A, B-1, B-2, C, D, E, and F notes. The
issuer also issued unrated subordinated notes.

The ratings reflect S&P's assessment of:

-- The diversified collateral pool, which primarily comprises
broadly syndicated speculative-grade senior secured term loans and
bonds that are governed by collateral quality tests.

-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization.

-- The collateral manager's experienced team, which can affect the
performance of the rated notes through collateral selection,
ongoing portfolio management, and trading.

-- The transaction's legal structure, which is bankruptcy remote.

-- The transaction's counterparty risks, which is in line with
S&P's counterparty rating framework.

  Portfolio benchmarks

                                                        CURRENT
  
  S&P Global Ratings weighted-average rating factor     2768.24

  Default rate dispersion                                555.36

  Weighted-average life (years)                            4.53

  Obligor diversity measure                              135.75

  Industry diversity measure                              20.30

  Regional diversity measure                               1.34


  Transaction key metrics
                                                        CURRENT
  
  Total par amount (mil. EUR)                               400

  Defaulted assets (mil. EUR)                                 0

  Number of performing obligors                             148

  Portfolio weighted-average rating
  derived from S&P's CDO evaluator                            B

  'CCC' category rated assets (%)                          2.11

  'AAA' covenanted weighted-average recovery (%)          36.00

  Covenanted weighted-average spread net of floors (%)     4.00


Asset priming obligations and uptier priming debt

Under the transaction documents, the issuer can purchase asset
priming obligations and/or uptier priming debt to address the risk,
where a distressed obligor could either move collateral outside the
existing creditors' covenant group or incur new money debt senior
to the existing creditors.

In this transaction, current pay obligations are limited to 5.0% of
the collateral principal amount, including uptier priming debt
(which are current pay obligations up to 2.5%). Corporate rescue
loans and uptier priming debt that comprise defaulted obligations
are limited to 5.0%.

Rationale

This is a European cash flow CLO transaction, securitizing a pool
of primarily syndicated senior secured loans or bonds. The
portfolio's reinvestment period ends approximately 4.4 years after
closing, and the portfolio's maximum average maturity date is 8.5
years after closing. Under the transaction documents, the rated
notes pay quarterly interest unless there is a frequency switch
event. Following this, the notes will switch to semiannual
payment.

The portfolio is well-diversified, primarily comprising broadly
syndicated speculative-grade senior secured term loans and
senior-secured bonds. Therefore, S&P has conducted its credit and
cash flow analysis by applying our criteria for corporate cash flow
CDOs.

S&P said, "In our cash flow analysis, we modeled the EUR400 million
target par amount, the covenanted weighted-average spread of 4.00%,
and the covenanted weighted-average recovery rates. We applied
various cash flow stress scenarios, using four different default
patterns, in conjunction with different interest rate stress
scenarios for each liability rating category.

“Following the application of our structured finance sovereign
risk criteria, we consider the transaction's exposure to country
risk is limited at the assigned ratings, as the exposure to
individual sovereigns does not exceed the diversification
thresholds outlined in our criteria.

"The transaction's documented counterparty replacement and remedy
mechanisms adequately mitigate its exposure to counterparty risk
under our current counterparty criteria.

"The transaction's legal structure is bankruptcy remote, in line
with our legal criteria.

"Following our analysis of the credit, cash flow, counterparty,
operational, and legal risks, we believe that our ratings are
commensurate with the available credit enhancement for each class
of notes.

"Our credit and cash flow analysis indicates that the available
credit enhancement for the class B-1, B-2, C, D, and E notes is
commensurate with higher ratings than those we have assigned.
However, as the CLO will have a reinvestment period, during which
the transaction's credit risk profile could deteriorate, we have
capped our assigned ratings on these notes. The class A notes can
withstand stresses commensurate with the assigned rating.

"For the class F notes, our credit and cash flow analysis indicate
that the available credit enhancement could withstand stresses that
are commensurate with a lower rating. However, we have applied our
'CCC' rating criteria resulting in a 'B- (sf)' rating on this class
of notes." The ratings uplift (to 'B-') reflects several key
factors, including:

-- The available credit enhancement for this class of notes is in
the same range as other CLOs that we rate, and that have recently
been issued in Europe.

-- The portfolio's average credit quality is similar to other
recent CLOs.

-- S&P's model generated break-even default rate at the 'B-'
rating level of 24.59% (for a portfolio with a weighted-average
life of 4.53 years), versus if it was to consider a long-term
sustainable default rate of 3.1% for 4.53 years, which would result
in a target default rate of 14.04%.

-- The actual portfolio is generating higher spreads versus the
covenanted thresholds that S&P has modelled in its cash flow
analysis.

S&P said, "For us to assign a rating in the 'CCC' category, we also
assess (i) whether the tranche is vulnerable to nonpayments in the
near future, (ii) if there is a one in two chance of this tranche
defaulting, and (iii) if we envision this tranche to default in the
next 12-18 months. Following this analysis, we consider that the
available credit enhancement for the class F notes is commensurate
with a 'B- (sf)' rating.

"In addition to our standard analysis, to provide an indication of
how rising pressures among speculative-grade corporates could
affect our ratings on European CLO transactions, we have also
included the sensitivity of the ratings on the class A to E notes
based on four hypothetical scenarios.

"As our ratings analysis makes additional considerations before
assigning ratings in the 'CCC' category, and we would assign a 'B-'
rating if the criteria for assigning a 'CCC' category rating are
not met, we have not included the above scenario analysis results
for the class F notes."

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG)

S&P said, "We regard the exposure to ESG credit factors in the
transaction as being broadly in line with our benchmark for the
sector. Primarily due to the diversity of the assets within CLOs,
the exposure to environmental credit factors is viewed as below
average, social credit factors are below average, and governance
credit factors are average. For this transaction, the documents
prohibit assets from being related to the following industries:
controversial weapons, sale and extraction of thermal coal and
fossil fuels from unconventional sources, 25% or more production
from sands or from shale and tight reservoirs, 10% or more
production from fields located in the Arctic, 25% or more revenue
from transactions in soft commodities, 25% or more revenue from
tobacco or tobacco-related products, and violation of the United
Nations Global Compact Ten Principles, International Labor
Organization's (ILO) Conventions, OECD Guidelines for Multinational
Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human
Rights.

ESG corporate credit indicators

S&P said, "The influence of ESG factors in our credit rating
analysis of European CLOs primarily depends on the influence of ESG
factors in our analysis of the underlying corporate obligors. To
provide additional disclosure and transparency of the influence of
ESG factors for the CLO asset portfolio in aggregate, we've
calculated the weighted-average and distributions of our ESG credit
indicators for the underlying obligors. We regard this
transaction's exposure as being broadly in line with our benchmark
for the sector, with the environmental and social credit indicators
concentrated primarily in category 2 (neutral) and the governance
credit indicators concentrated in category 3 (moderately
negative).

  Corporate ESG credit indicators

                                 Environmental  Social  Governance

  Weighted-average credit indicator*     2.09    2.22    2.89

  E-1/S-1/G-1 distribution (%)           0.73    0.25    0.00

  E-2/S-2/G-2 distribution (%)          74.68   69.87   14.53

  E-3/S-3/G-3 distribution (%)           8.00    8.67   65.77

  E-4/S-4/G-4 distribution (%)           0.00    4.12    0.98

  E-5/S-5/G-5 distribution (%)           0.00    0.50    2.12

  Unmatched obligor (%)                  6.60    6.60    6.60

  Unidentified asset (%)                10.00   10.00   10.00

*Only includes matched obligor

  Ratings list

  CLASS    RATING     AMOUNT     SUB (%)      INTEREST RATE*
                    (MIL. EUR)

  A        AAA (sf)    244.00    39.00   Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                         plus 1.85%

  B-1      AA (sf)      30.00    29.00   Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                         plus 3.15%

  B-2      AA (sf)      10.00    29.00   6.95%
  
  C        A (sf)       20.50    23.88   Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                         plus 3.90%

  D        BBB- (sf)    26.00    17.38   Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                         plus 6.40%

  E        BB- (sf)     16.50    13.25   Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                         plus 7.67%

  F        B- (sf)      19.00     8.50   Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                         plus 10.22%

  Sub      NR           26.40      N/A   N/A

*The payment frequency switches to semiannual and the index
switches to six-month EURIBOR when a frequency switch event occurs.

EURIBOR--Euro Interbank Offered Rate.
NR--Not rated.
N/A--Not applicable.




=========
I T A L Y
=========

TELECOM ITALIA: KKR Offers to Raise Bid for Landline Grid
---------------------------------------------------------
Elvira Pollina and Akriti Sharma at Reuters report that U.S. fund
KKR strengthened its lead in the race to secure the landline grid
of Telecom Italia (TIM) when it offered to raise its bid by up to
or over EUR2 billion (US$2.2 billion), two people with knowledge of
the matter said.

According to Reuters, the value of KKR's offer could top EUR23
billion overall, widening the gap with a rival proposal by a
consortium comprising Italian state lender CDP and Australian fund
Macquarie.

The improved offer would still be short of a valuation of more than
EUR30 billion for the grid sought by TIM's top shareholder Vivendi,
Reuters states.  But it remains TIM CEO Pietro Labriola's best
option to pull off plans to rescue the debt-laden firm via a sale
of the network, Reuters notes.

Sources had previously told Reuters that both Mr. Labriola and some
leading Italian officials already saw KKR as the strongest bidder
prior to the June 9 proposal.

TIM said late on June 9 it had received two new offers for its
grid, without providing details. It had sought improved offers for
its most valuable asset after having assessed as not yet adequate
the proposals received in May, Reuters recounts.

Mr. Labriola plans to focus TIM's efforts on its ServCo services
business and sell its NetCo unit comprising the domestic
fixed-access network and international submarine cable unit Sparkle
to cut debt, Reuters discloses.

The overall value of KKR's bid hinges on the terms of the contracts
linking ServCo to NetCo, the sources said, adding that the fund had
asked for four weeks to carry out due diligence to discuss such
conditions, according to Reuters.

TIM's board meets to review the proposals on June 19 and is
expected to take a decision on June 22, Reuters states.




=========
S P A I N
=========

FONCAIXA FTGENCAT 5: Moody's Affirms C Rating on EUR26.5MM D Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the rating of Class C Notes
in FONCAIXA FTGENCAT 5, FTA. The rating action reflects the
increased credit enhancement for the affected Notes.

Moody's affirmed the ratings of the Notes that had sufficient
credit enhancement to maintain their current ratings.

EUR449.4M (Current Outstanding Amount EUR57.6M) Class A (G) Notes,
Affirmed Aa1 (sf); previously on Aug 24, 2022 Affirmed Aa1 (sf)

EUR21M Class B Notes, Affirmed Aa1 (sf); previously on Aug 24,
2022 Affirmed Aa1 (sf)

EUR16.5M Class C Notes, Upgraded to Aa3 (sf); previously on Aug
24, 2022 Upgraded to A2 (sf)

EUR26.5M Class D Notes, Affirmed C (sf); previously on Aug 24,
2022 Affirmed C (sf)

Maximum achievable rating is Aa1 (sf) for structured finance
transactions in Spain, driven by the corresponding local currency
country ceiling of the country.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating action is prompted by an increase in credit enhancement
for the affected tranche.

Revision of Key Collateral Assumptions:

As part of the rating action, Moody's reassessed its default
probability and recovery rate assumptions for the portfolio
reflecting the collateral performance to date.

The performance of the transaction has continued to be stable since
the last rating action in August 2022. Total delinquencies have
decreased in the past year, with 90 days plus arrears currently
standing at 4.2% of current pool balance. Cumulative defaults
currently stand at 8.4% of original pool balance in line with 8.3%
a year earlier.

For FONCAIXA FTGENCAT 5, FTA, the current default probability is
17% of the current portfolio balance and the assumption for the
fixed recovery rate is 55%. Moody's has decreased the CoV to 56.5%%
from 57.2%, which, combined with the revised key collateral
assumptions, corresponds to a portfolio credit enhancement of
24.5%.

Increase in Available Credit Enhancement

Sequential amortization led to the increase in the credit
enhancement available in this transaction.

For instance, the credit enhancement for the Class C Notes
increased to 27.9% from 23.5% since the last rating action.

Counterparty Exposure

The rating actions took into consideration the Notes' exposure to
relevant counterparties, such as servicer, account bank or swap
provider.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating SME Balance Sheet Securitizations" published in
July 2022.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Factors or circumstances that could lead to an upgrade of the
ratings include: (1) performance of the underlying collateral that
is better than Moody's expected, (2) an increase in available
credit enhancement, (3) improvements in the credit quality of the
transaction counterparties, and (4) a decrease in sovereign risk.

Factors or circumstances that could lead to a downgrade of the
ratings include: (1) an increase in sovereign risk, (2) performance
of the underlying collateral that is worse than Moody's expected,
(3) deterioration in the Notes' available credit enhancement, and
(4) deterioration in the credit quality of the transaction
counterparties.




===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS: Moody's Rates New Hybrid Notes 'Ba1'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Ba1 backed long-term
rating to the proposed subordinated GBP-denominated capital
securities due December 2083 (the hybrid securities) to be issued
by British Telecommunications Plc (BT or the company, a subsidiary
of BT Group plc) under its EMTN Program. The outlook is stable.

"The Ba1 rating assigned to the hybrid debt is two notches below
BT's issuer and senior unsecured ratings of Baa2. This reflects the
instruments' deeply subordinated position in relation to the
existing unsecured obligations in the company's capital structure"
says Luigi Bucci, a Moody's AVP-Analyst and lead analyst for BT.

"BT plans to use the proceeds from the offering for general
corporate purposes" adds Mr Bucci.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The proposed hybrid securities, which will be guaranteed by BT
Group Plc on a subordinated basis, are long-dated with a 60.5-year
maturity and they do not present any cross-default provisions. The
issuer can also opt to defer settlement of interest on the hybrid
securities on a cumulative basis. The rating agency notes that the
interest on the proposed hybrid securities will step-up by 25 basis
points (bps) in December 2033, at least 10 years after the
issuance/five years after the first reset date, and an additional
75 bps in December 2048, 20 years after the first reset date.

The hybrid securities are deeply subordinated obligations ranking
senior only to common shares, pari passu with preference shares,
and junior to all senior and subordinated debt. They thus qualify
for "basket C", i.e. 50% equity treatment, for the purpose of
calculating Moody's credit ratios (please refer to Moody's
cross-sector rating methodology 'Hybrid Equity Credit' dated
September 2018).

The hybrid securities' rating is positioned relative to BT's senior
unsecured and issuer ratings. Thus a change in the company's issuer
and senior unsecured ratings or a re-evaluation of the relative
notching could impact the hybrid securities' rating.

BT's Baa2 ratings reflect the company's: (1) strong business
profile, and leading position as an integrated fixed and mobile
telecommunications operator in the UK; (2) ongoing acceleration in
its fibre-to-the-premise (FTTP) deployment; (3) improving operating
performance and strong cost-saving capabilities; and (4) solid
liquidity, supported by BT's cash balance and undrawn revolving
credit facility.

However, the ratings are constrained by the company's: (1) limited
leverage reduction prospects; (2) sustained challenges in its
Business segment; (3) ongoing pressures on free cash flow
generation because of its high capital spending for FTTP/5G rollout
and pension deficit payments; and (4) the intrinsic volatility of
the IAS19 pension deficit, which can increase Moody's leverage
projections.

RATIONALE FOR STABLE OUTLOOK

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation of an
improvement in the company's financial performance, supported by
significant price increases and a sustained take-up of fibre
products at Openreach despite continued pressures in the Business
segment. Such an improvement should keep Moody's-adjusted leverage
below 3.5x and Moody's-adjusted retained cash flow (RCF)/net debt
well above 18%, both on a sustained basis.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATING

Moody's could upgrade BT's ratings if its: (1) underlying operating
performance and cash flow generation substantially improve, with
growing revenue and stronger key performance indicator (KPI) trends
leading to a sustainable EBITDA growth trajectory, coupled with
visibility into capital spending requirements; (2) Moody's-adjusted
RCF/net debt remains above 22% on a sustained basis; and (3)
Moody's-adjusted debt/EBITDA remains below 2.8x on a sustained
basis.

Downward pressure on the rating could arise if BT's: (1) operating
performance weakens compared with the rating agency's current
expectations, or the risks arising from the pension deficit
significantly increase as a result of a widening in the deficit;
(2) Moody's-adjusted RCF/net debt remains consistently below 18%;
and (3) Moody's-adjusted adjusted debt/EBITDA exceeds 3.5x on a
sustained basis.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in this rating was
Telecommunications Service Providers published in September 2022.

COMPANY PROFILE

BT Group Plc is a leading UK telecommunications and network
operator and a leading provider of global communications services
and solutions, serving customers in roughly 180 countries. Over
fiscal 2023 (ending March), the company generated revenues and
EBITDA -as reported- of GBP20.7 billion and GBP7.9 billion,
respectively.


CINEWORLD: To File for Administration as Part of Restructuring
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Kleinman at Sky News reports that Cineworld's London-listed
holding company is preparing to file for administration as part of
a comprehensive financial restructuring that will wipe out its
shareholders.

Sky News understands that the multinational cinema operator is
lining up AlixPartners to act as administrator to help effect a
transfer of ownership to its lenders.

An announcement is expected to be made by the end of next week,
according to one source, Sky News notes.

Cineworld trades from 128 sites in the UK, according to a
spokesman, employing thousands of people.

According to Sky News, insiders said its British operations will
not be impacted by the insolvency process for the holding company.

The restructuring will reduce Cineworld's indebtedness by $4.5
billion and be accompanied by an US$800 million rights issue to
place the company on a sustainable financial footing, according to
a statement in April, Sky News discloses.


INEOS ENTERPRISES: Moody's Rates New EUR650MM Secured Loan 'Ba3'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned Ba3 rating to INEOS Enterprises
Holdings Limited's proposed EUR650 million equivalent senior
secured term loan B (TLB) due 2030, currently being marketed by
INEOS ENTERPRISES HOLDINGS II LIMITED and INEOS ENTERPRISES
HOLDINGS US FINCO LLC. Other ratings of INEOS Enterprises Holdings
Limited (INEOS Enterprises) and related entities are unaffected.
These include INEOS Enterprises' Ba3 corporate family rating, its
Ba3-PD probability of default rating, as well as the Ba3 ratings of
INEOS ENTERPRISES HOLDINGS II LIMITED's senior secured term loan A
and senior secured term loan B, both due 2026. The Ba3 rating of
INEOS ENTERPRISES HOLDINGS US FINCO LLC's senior secured term loan
B due 2026 is also unaffected. The outlook is stable for all
entities.

The proceeds of the proposed TLB will be used to refinance INEOS
ENTERPRISES HOLDINGS US FINCO LLC's outstanding $360m senior
secured TLB, repay EUR71 million currently outstanding under the
receivables securitisation facility and to pay related transaction
fees. Approximately EUR250 million are slated to be retained by
INEOS Enterprises for general corporate purposes.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating action reflects diversified business profile of INEOS
Enterprises, its leading positions in the markets where it
operates, good liquidity with significant amount of cash on balance
sheet and full availability under the company's EUR250 million
securitisation facility and pro-active management of debt maturity
profile. Rating action also takes into account currently weak
trading against the challenging macroeconomic backdrop and
softening credit metrics as a result.

INEOS Enterprises reported EBITDA of EUR413 million for the last
twelve months ending March 2023 (or EUR448 million pro-forma for
acquisition of the chlorine business from ASHTA, renamed INEOS KOH,
which closed in the fourth quarter of 2022). Performance in the
first quarter of 2023 (EBITDA of EUR96 million) has deteriorated
year-on-year (EBITDA of EUR143 million in first quarter of 2022),
however it was an improvement over the fourth quarter of 2022
(EBITDA of EUR73 million). In the first quarter of 2023, demand has
started to recover amidst still challenging market conditions, and
INEOS KOH was consolidated for the full quarter adding EUR10
million to EBITDA, despite its operations being impacted by an
unplanned outage in March. Composites segment improved as evidenced
by an EBITDA increase of EUR9 million sequentially, supported by
resilient demand in North America and improving orders in China.
Solvents returned to positive EBITDA, as energy prices stabilised
in Europe; however, volumes remain depressed due to availability of
lower cost imports. Pigments segment saw its EBITDA sequentially
decline as destocking continued, but margins remained stable thanks
to firm pricing, while Chemical intermediaries performance
continues to be challenged owing to fall in volumes and margins for
PIA (purified isophthalic acid) and TMA (trimellitic anhydride)
products in the Joliet business. Hygienics generated a loss of EUR6
million (EUR5 million in the prior year period) and remains focused
on developing new product ranges and investing in marketing.

Moody's-adjusted leverage stood at 3.7x as of March 2023 (pro-forma
for INEOS KOH business). Moody's expects leverage to increase to
4.3x pro forma for the new debt issuance and to remain above 4.0x
in 2023, as the rating agency does not anticipate trading
conditions to improve materially before second half of 2023.
Interest coverage of 5.1x (measured as EBITDA/Interest expense) is
expected to decline closer to 3.0x in 2023 due to higher interest
rates and increased gross debt quantum, before recovering in 2024.
Free cash flow generation (after dividends) is expected to be
slightly negative in 2023, driven by higher cash interest and
assumption of continued voluntary repayments under shareholder
loan, which Moody's treats as dividend payments. The rating will
have limited headroom over the next few quarters for absorbing any
operational underperformance. However, Moody's notes that company
has meaningful cash amount on the balance sheet, that could be used
towards bolt-on acquisitions.

The Ba3 corporate family rating (CFR) of INEOS Enterprises reflects
its robust business profile, which benefits from leading positions
in many of its markets and high degree of diversification. INEOS
Enterprises' assets and sales are evenly balanced between EMEA and
the Americas, albeit with a limited presence in the fast growing
Asia Pacific. Counterbalancing these strengths are the intrinsic
cyclicality of INEOS Enterprises' business and the parent company's
history of shareholder friendly policies.

LIQUIDITY

INEOS Enterprises' liquidity position is good.  At the end of March
2023, the company reported EUR313 million of cash on hand along
with a EUR250 million securitisation facility collateralised by
trade receivables, of which circa EUR107 million were available.
Liquidity is expected to improve further post debt issuance. The
company has no near-term debt maturities.

STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS

The Ba3 ratings of the TLA and TLB of INEOS ENTERPRISES HOLDINGS II
LIMITED and the TLB of INEOS ENTERPRISES HOLDINGS US FINCO LLC,
reflect the fact that both loans are senior secured obligations of
the borrowers, rank pari passu with each other and benefit, to the
extent legally possible, from the same first ranking guarantees
from all material subsidiaries representing at least 85% of the
restricted group's consolidated EBITDA and assets.  The proposed
new term loan B is expected to be pari passu with the existing debt
and carry similar terms.

RATING OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that INEOS
Enterprises' gross leverage will revert to the rating guidance of
4.0x or below over the next 12-18 months as demand recovers and
that the company will not make significant one-off shareholder
distributions.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Positive rating momentum may arise over time should INEOS
Enterprises demonstrate (i) consistent profitability by maintaining
or growing its Moody's-adjusted EBITDA margin in the teens; (ii)
sustained positive FCF generation after capex and dividends; (iii)
Moody's-adjusted total and net debt to EBITDA below 3.0x and 2.5x
through the cycle; and (iv) conservative financial policy in line
with its stated net leverage target of below 3.0x through the
cycle.

Conversely, the ratings could come under downward pressure, should
INEOS Enterprises' operating results fall short of Moody's
expectations and FCF generation turn negative, resulting in some
deterioration in liquidity and leverage reflected in
Moody's-adjusted total and net debt to EBITDA rising above 4x and
3.5x for an extended period of time.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Chemicals
published in June 2022.

COMPANY PROFILE

Headquartered in the UK, INEOS Enterprises Holdings Limited is a
leading producer of intermediary chemicals with strong
manufacturing platforms in Europe and North America, operating
fourteen sites in each of the two regions. In the last twelve
months ending March 2023, INEOS Enterprises reported pro-forma
EBITDA of EUR448 million.


MB AEROSPACE II: Moody's Raises CFR to Caa1, On Further Review
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded all the ratings of
UK-headquartered aerospace component manufacturer MB Aerospace
Holdings II Corp. (MBA or the company) by one notch and placed the
ratings on review for further upgrade. The outlook has been changed
to ratings under review from negative.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The upgrade of MBA's corporate family rating to Caa1 from Caa2
reflects the announced acquisition of MBA by US-based aerospace and
industrial equipment company Barnes Group on June 5, 2023 for an
enterprise value of $740 million. It represents a high valuation of
around 13x 2022 management adjusted EBITDA and reflects the
attractivity of the business in the eyes of the buyer.

The action further reflects the company's improved operating
performance in 2022 and prospects for solid revenue and profit
growth in 2023. Demand in the aerospace value chain remains very
strong as flying activity from airlines has rebounded significantly
and they seek to recover their pre-pandemic capacity while renewing
their aircraft fleets.

The upgrade of the senior secured first lien term loan and
revolving credit facility (RCF) to B3 from Caa1 keeps their ratings
one notch above the CFR, reflecting their ranking ahead of the
company's $100 million senior secured second lien term loan.

The review for upgrade reflects (i) Moody's expectation that the
completion of the sale would result in the repayment of all the
group's outstanding debt and (ii) Moody's assessment of the much
higher credit quality of the acquirer compared with that of MBA.

The completion of the sale is expected in Q4 2023 and is subject to
customary approvals, including by regulatory authorities in various
countries.

The review process will primarily focus on the closing of the sale
transaction while Moody's will continue to monitor improvements in
MBA's trading performance and the adequacy of the company's
liquidity.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Prior to the ratings review, Moody's said that an upgrade of MBA's
ratings could occur if (i) the company grew its earnings and if its
cash flows approached breakeven levels, leading to improved
liquidity headroom, and (ii) if there was a reduction in leverage
such that the company carried a more sustainable capital
structure.

Prior to the ratings review process, Moody's also said that MBA's
ratings could be downgraded if (i) liquidity weakened, or (ii) the
likelihood of a financial restructuring increased, or (iii) MBA
failed to deliver material trading improvements and reduce
leverage.

LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS

Upgrades and Placed on Review for Upgrade:

Issuer: MB Aerospace Holdings II Corp.

Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to Caa1-PD from
Caa2-PD; Placed on Review for Upgrade

LT Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to Caa1 from Caa2;
Placed on Review for Upgrade

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Upgraded to B3 from
Caa1; Placed on Review for Upgrade

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: MB Aerospace Holdings II Corp.

Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Negative

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Aerospace and
Defense published in October 2021.

COMPANY PROFILE

MB Aerospace Holdings II Corp. is a tier one and tier two supplier
of original equipment parts for aero-engines, focused on
large-diameter cases, housings, as well as rotating parts. In 2022,
MBA reported $276 million revenue and $49 million EBITDA before
exceptionals. MBA has been owned by private equity funds managed by
Blackstone since October 2015.


RAWDON ASSET: Director Gets 7-Year Sentence for Fraud
-----------------------------------------------------
The Insolvency Service on June 9 disclosed that a Yorkshire-based
finance boss has been found guilty of fraud and sentenced to 7
years imprisonment at Leeds Crown Court.

An investigation by the Insolvency Service found Liam Francis
Wainwright, 61, from Leeds, had falsified documents to mislead
investors and spend their money on ventures including a racehorse
syndicate and his own failed private businesses.

These investors were victims of a classic Ponzi scheme, whereby the
returns paid to them were funded by the capital injections from
later investors.

Mr. Wainwright, who had been a director of Rawdon Asset Finance
Ltd, was disqualified for 11 years in November 2020 after
investigators at the Insolvency Service found he had falsified
around GBP12 million worth of entries in the company's loan book in
the two years before the company entered administration in 2019.

After a further criminal investigation, the Insolvency Service
brought the director to court on counts of false accounting, fraud,
forgery, and acting as a director while bankrupt.

Julie Barnes, Chief Investigator for the Insolvency Service, said:

Mr. Wainwright's greed and selfish actions had a devastating effect
on the people who had put their trust in him and his business.

His victims included elderly and vulnerable people.  Many investors
lost most or all of the money they had entrusted to him, and some
lost their life savings.

His sentencing shows that the Insolvency Service will seek the
toughest penalties for those who break the law, to help ensure that
the UK is a safe place for investors and for businesses.

The court heard that Mr. Wainwright had enjoyed a lavish lifestyle
as a result of his offending, and that his actions had had a
devastating impact on individuals and families who had invested
money into the business.

Mr. Wainwright told investors and shareholders that Rawdon Asset
Finance was lending money to businesses with security on property,
land or plant and equipment, but was in fact using the cash to pay
returns to other creditors, buy into a racehorse syndicate and to
fund other companies, including a Lincolnshire-based property
development and a redevelopment company in West Yorkshire, both
linked to himself.

By the time the company went into liquidation, Rawdon Asset
Finance's creditors were owed more than GBP20 million. Liquidators
have so far recovered GBP750,630.

Mr. Wainwright admitted that he began to falsify accounts from
around 2017, to hide the company's true financial position from his
co-directors and investors.  He also admitted he had earlier forged
a mortgagor's signature on a legal charge to mislead investors and
had -- between April 2010 and April 2011 -- breached the terms of a
previous bankruptcy by acting as a director of the company the
court's permission.

The court also heard that Mr. Wainwright had lied about the
company's accounts and the destination of funds in order to elicit
GBP100,000 from one investor only weeks before the business
collapsed, in the full knowledge that investors would not get their
money back.

Mr. Wainwright pleaded guilty on February 20, 2023, at Kirklees
Magistrates' Court, and was sentenced at Leeds Crown Court by His
Honour Judge Bayliss on June 9, 2023.

The Judge passed concurrent sentences for all charges, except for
the sentence for fraud against the final investor, which was added
consecutively to reflect an escalation in Mr. Wainwright's
culpability.


[*] UK: Scotland Reports Biggest Rise in Business Insolvencies
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Scotsman reports that an analysis of business insolvencies has
found Scotland recorded the biggest rise out of all UK nations last
year, with an increase in almost nine in ten UK local authorities
compared to the year before the pandemic.

According to The Scotsman, a report published has found 187 out of
221 upper tier authorities in the UK saw a rise in liquidations
comparing 2019 to 2022 -- equivalent to an 85% share.  The report
states the withdrawal of UK Government support and soaring energy
costs have been blamed for the rise, with retail and construction
the hardest hit, The Scotsman notes.



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2023.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *