/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/220415.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Friday, April 15, 2022, Vol. 23, No. 70

                           Headlines



G E R M A N Y

GAZPROM GERMANIA: Energy Regulator to Ensure Ongoing Operations


I R E L A N D

HARVEST CLO XXVIII: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to EUR12.2MM F Notes


I T A L Y

BANCA POPOLARE: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' LT IDR, Outlook Now Stable
BANCO DI DESIO: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' LT IDR, Outlook Stable


K A Z A K H S T A N

SB ALFA-BANK: S&P Keeps 'B' ICR on Watch Neg. Then Withdraws Rating


N E T H E R L A N D S

VEON: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' Ratings Then Withdraws Ratings on EU Ban


S P A I N

BAHIA DE LAS ISLETAS: Moody's Puts 'Ca' CFR on Review for Upgrade
PYMES SANTANDER 15: Moody's Hikes EUR600MM B Notes Rating to Caa1


U K R A I N E

[*] UKRAINE: Seeks Seizure, Sale of Russian Assets


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

ANGEL CONTRACTING: Director Faces Six-Year Disqualification
EVRAZ PLC: S&P Lowers Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating to 'CC'
LITA GROUP: Files for Administration with High Court
MORRISONS: Moody's Downgrades Rating to 'B1', Outlook Stable
PETROPAVLOVSK PLC: Mulls Sale Following Sanctions Against Russia

PINE DEVELOPMENTS: Former Pontins Holiday Camp Put Up for Sale
PIPELINE ENGINEERING: Enters Administration, 83 Jobs Affected
STUDIO TRI: Clogau Left Out of Pocket Following Administration
WILLIAM MASON: Director Faces 10-Year Disqualification


X X X X X X X X

[*] BOOK REVIEW: Bankruptcy and Secured Lending in Cyberspace

                           - - - - -


=============
G E R M A N Y
=============

GAZPROM GERMANIA: Energy Regulator to Ensure Ongoing Operations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Kackenhoff and Vera Eckert at Reuters report that Germany's
energy network regulator on April 8 said it would ensure ongoing
operations at Gazprom Germania, a trading, storage and transmission
business abandoned by Russia's Gazprom, and called on market
operators not to cut ties.

With assets and subsidiaries in Germany, Britain, Switzerland,
Belgium, the Czech Republic and outside Europe, the firm's
activities are essential for the European gas market and its supply
to industry and households.

Russia's Gazprom previously said it was quitting its business in
Germany, at a moment of crisis in energy ties between the two
countries following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Reuters recounts.
It gave no explanation.

"The Bundesnetzagentur will ensure that all payments of Gazprom
Germania GmbH may only be made to maintain business operations and
will thus prevent an uncontrolled outflow of funds," the German
regulator said in a letter to operators connected with Gazprom
Germania and seen by Reuters.

Spokespeople for the authority confirmed the letter had been
posted.

"It will also ensure that the company can, and will, meet its
payment obligations to continue its business operations," it
added.

Gazprom Germania GmbH was taken into the regulator's control on
April 4 as the Economy Ministry sought to stave off a possible
acquisition by JSC Palmary and Gazprom Export Business Services
LLC, both of Russia, the Economy Ministry said at the time, Reuters
relates.

The regulator, in its letter addressed to banks, business partners,
services providers and customers, said the company needed to
procure gas and have the means to pay for it, avoiding insolvency,
Reuters notes.

"The consequences (of an insolvency) for the energy supply system,
not only in Germany but in Europe as well, would be severe,"
Reuters quotes the regulator as saying.

It said trading firms could collapse, transport would be disrupted,
and underground storage caverns would remain unfilled, Reuters
relays.

The April 4 move by the authority means it can remove executives,
hire staff and direct management, as well as guarding against an
outflow of finances, Reuters states.




=============
I R E L A N D
=============

HARVEST CLO XXVIII: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to EUR12.2MM F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has assigned the
following definitive ratings to notes issued by Harvest CLO XXVIII
Designated Activity Company (the "Issuer"):

EUR2,500,000 Class X Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2034,
Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

EUR224,500,000 Class A-1 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2034, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

EUR50,000,000 Class A-2 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2034, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

EUR47,300,000 Class B Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2034,
Definitive Rating Assigned Aa2 (sf)

EUR23,900,000 Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034, Definitive Rating Assigned A2 (sf)

EUR30,900,000 Class D Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034, Definitive Rating Assigned Baa3 (sf)

EUR25,600,000 Class E Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034, Definitive Rating Assigned Ba3 (sf)

EUR12,200,000 Class F Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034, Definitive Rating Assigned B3 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on a consideration of the
risks associated with the CLO's portfolio and structure as
described in Moody's methodology.

The Issuer is a managed cash flow CLO. At least 90% of the
portfolio must consist of secured senior loans or senior secured
bonds and up to 10% of the portfolio may consist of unsecured
senior loans, second-lien loans, high yield bonds and mezzanine
loans. The portfolio is expected to be 80% ramped up as of the
closing date and to comprise of predominantly corporate loans to
obligors domiciled in Western Europe. The remainder of the
portfolio will be acquired during the 6 months ramp-up period in
compliance with the portfolio guidelines.

Investcorp Credit Management EU Limited ("Investcorp") will manage
the CLO. It will direct the selection, acquisition and disposition
of collateral on behalf of the Issuer and may engage in trading
activity, including discretionary trading, during the transaction's
four-and-a-half-year reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to
certain restrictions, purchases are permitted using principal
proceeds from unscheduled principal payments and proceeds from
sales of credit risk obligations and credit improved obligations.

Interest and principal amortisation amounts due to the Class X
Notes are paid pro rata with payments to the Class A-1 Notes and
Class A-2 Notes. The Class X Notes amortise by 12.5% or EUR312,500
over eight payment dates starting on the second payment date.

In addition to the eight classes of notes rated by Moody's, the
Issuer will issue EUR625,000 of Class Z Notes due 2034 and
EUR34,400,000 of Subordinated Notes due 2034 which are not rated.
The Class Z Notes accrue interest in an amount equivalent to a
certain proportion of the subordinated management fees and its
notes' payment is pari passu with the payment of the subordinated
management fee.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2021.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

The rated notes' performance is subject to uncertainty. The notes'
performance is sensitive to the performance of the underlying
portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and credit conditions
that may change. The collateral manager's investment decisions and
management of the transaction will also affect the notes'
performance.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3 of
the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2021.

Moody's used the following base-case modeling assumptions:

Target Par Amount: EUR450,000,000

Diversity Score: 47

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 3036

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 3.88%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 4.75%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 43.4%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 7.5 years



=========
I T A L Y
=========

BANCA POPOLARE: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' LT IDR, Outlook Now Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has revised Banca Popolare dell'Alto Adige's
(Volksbank) Outlook to Stable from Negative, while affirming its
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB+' and Viability Rating
(VR) at 'bb+'.

The revision of the Outlook reflects Fitch's view that risks to the
bank's asset quality from the pandemic have eased, due to the solid
economic recovery of Volksbank's home province of Bolzano and
strong repayment of loans that were previously under moratoriums.
Profitability prospects also improved, as fee income rebounded
above pre-pandemic levels and loan impairment charges (LICs)
started to normalise.

Fitch has withdrawn Volksbank's Support Rating of '5' and Support
Rating Floor of 'No Floor' as they are no longer relevant to the
agency's coverage following the publication of its updated Bank
Rating Criteria on 12 November 2021. In line with the updated
criteria, Fitch has assigned Volksbank a Government Support Rating
(GSR) of 'No Support' (ns).

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Small Bank in Wealthy Region: Volksbank's IDRs and VR reflect its
ample capital buffers relative to regulatory minimum requirements,
despite its small equity size, and adequate funding from a stable
deposit franchise. They also reflect a geographically concentrated
franchise in the wealthy province of Bolzano, in northern Italy,
and a less diversified business model than higher-rated peers',
resulting in below-average profitability and cost efficiency. While
improving, asset quality remains a rating weakness.

Average Asset Quality Metrics: Volksbank's gross impaired
loans/gross loans of 5.8% at end-2021 is slightly above the
domestic industry average and remains high internationally.
However, impaired loans coverage of 74% is stronger than in the
past and compares well with peers'.

Asset Quality Resilient to Risks: Fitch expects Volksbank's
impaired loan ratio to reduce only slightly in the coming years, as
the bank's target is somewhat less ambitious than higher-rated
peers'. Volksbank's concentration in some of Italy's wealthiest
areas should however result in resilient asset-quality metrics to
downside risks.

Moderate Risk Profile: Volksbank's credit underwriting standards
are conservative and in line with domestic industry practices.
Investment guidelines result in a large own sovereign risk
exposure. Risk controls may still lack depth and sophistication
relative to higher-rated peers', although Fitch acknowledges the
bank's ongoing plan to strengthen them.

Modest Profitability: Volksbank's revenue generation has been under
pressure in recent years from a still fairly undiversified business
model, low interest rates and intense competition. Costs remain
under control but are structurally high relative to revenue, as the
bank's small size makes it difficult to achieve material economies
of scale.

Positive Profitability Prospects: Fitch believes that Volksbank's
operating profitability could structurally improve as the bank's
strategy to grow fee-based activities is starting to pay off and
LICs should normalise well below historical levels. However, Fitch
believes that execution risk remains, especially if Italy's GDP
growth slows more than currently envisaged.

Capitalisation Commensurate with VR: Capitalisation is scored at
'bb+', reflecting that the common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratio of
15.7% at end-2021 had ample buffer over regulatory requirements and
capital was no longer encumbered by large amounts of unreserved
impaired loans. Fitch expects capital ratios to remain broadly
stable, as improved profitability should allow the bank to meet its
capital distribution targets while also outpacing risk-weighted
assets (RWAs) growth.

Small Capital Base, Concentration Risk: The small size of the
bank's equity base results in a negative adjustment to Fitch's
implied capitalisation and leverage score of 'bbb', as it increases
vulnerability to concentration risk arising from its large holdings
of Italian government bonds (389% of CET1 capital at end-2021) and
potential asset-quality deterioration from weaker macroeconomic
conditions.

Largely Deposit-Funded: Volksbank's funding relies mainly on a
stable and growing base of deposits from loyal local customers.
Funding is less diversified, absent of the need to build resolution
buffers, and the ability to access the debt market at times of
volatility is more uncertain than at larger domestic peers.

Manageable Central Bank Financing: Volksbank's use of ECB funding
is high but similar to domestic peers', and mainly
opportunistically motivated by its very favourable pricing rather
than liquidity needs. Refinancing risk is manageable, as the bank
maintains a healthy buffer of liquid assets.

No Support: Volksbank's GSR of 'ns' reflects Fitch's view that
although external extraordinary sovereign support is possible, it
cannot be relied on. Volksbank's GSR of 'ns' reflects that senior
creditors can no longer expect to receive full extraordinary
support from the sovereign in the event that the bank becomes
non-viable. The EU's Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and the
Single Resolution Mechanism for eurozone banks provide a framework
for resolving banks that requires senior creditors participating in
losses, if necessary, instead of or ahead of a bank receiving
sovereign support.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Fitch could downgrade the ratings if the impaired loans ratio
    rises above 8% without prospects of reversing in the short
    term, resulting in capital encumbrance by unreserved impaired
    loans rising substantially on a sustained basis. Fitch could
    also downgrade the ratings if operating profitability
    deteriorates materially, falling below 0.5% of RWAs for a
    prolonged period, showing structural weaknesses.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Volksbank's moderate business profile means Fitch sees limited
    scope for an upgrade unless the bank generates significantly
    larger and more diversified revenue, and improves operating
    profitability above 1.5% of RWAs. An upgrade would also
    require an impaired loans ratio structurally below 4% and the
    maintenance of its current capitalisation profile.

-- An upward revision of the GSR would be contingent on a
    positive change in the sovereign's propensity to support the
    bank. In Fitch's view, this is highly unlikely, although not
    impossible.

OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: KEY RATING DRIVERS

DEPOSIT RATINGS

Volksbank's long-term deposits rating of 'BB+' is in line with the
bank's Long-Term IDR. This is because Volksbank has no binding
resolution requirement in excess of its ordinary capital
requirements and unsecured debt buffers that are junior to customer
deposits at end-2021 were below the 10% of RWAs required to grant
an uplift above the Long-Term IDR under Fitch's criteria. The
rating also reflects that the bank is unlikely to reach the
required quantum of debt buffers, particularly since it is not
bound by regulatory requirements.

The short-term deposit rating of 'B' is in line with the bank's
'BB+' long-term deposit rating under Fitch's rating correspondence
table.

SUBORDINATED DEBT

Volksbank's subordinated debt is rated two notches below the VR for
loss severity to reflect poor recovery prospects. No notching is
applied for incremental non-performance risk because write-down of
the notes will only occur once the point of non-viability is
reached and there is no coupon flexibility before non-viability.

OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- The deposit and subordinated debt ratings could be downgraded
    if Volksbank's IDRs and VR are downgraded.

-- The subordinated debt is also sensitive to an adverse change
    in the notes' notching, which could arise if Fitch changes its
    assessment of their non-performance relative to the risk
    captured in the VR.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- The deposit and subordinated debt ratings could be upgraded if
    Volksbank's IDRs and VR are upgraded.

-- The deposit ratings could also be upgraded if the buffers of
    unsecured senior and junior debt increase and are maintained
    above 10% of RWAs, or if the bank receives and maintains
    compliance with binding resolution buffers in excess of
    regulatory capital requirements.

VR ADJUSTMENTS

The capitalisation and leverage score of 'bb+' is below the 'bbb'
category implied score due to the following adjustment reason: size
of capital base (negative).

The funding and liquidity score of 'bb+' is below the 'bbb'
category implied score due to the following adjustment reason:
non-deposit funding (negative).

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and
Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.

DEBT                       RATING                         PRIOR
----                       ------                         -----
Banca Popolare dell'Alto Adige S.p.A.

                       LT IDR BB+ Affirmed                 BB+
                       ST IDR B Affirmed                   B
                       Viability bb+ Affirmed              bb+
                       Support WD Withdrawn                5
                       Support Floor WD Withdrawn          NF
                       Government Support ns New Rating
long-term deposits     LTB B+ Affirmed                     BB+
Subordinated           LT BB- Affirmed                     BB-
short-term deposits    ST B Affirmed                       B

BANCO DI DESIO: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A.'s
(Desio) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB+' with a
Stable Outlook and Viability Rating (VR) at 'bb+'. A full list of
rating actions is below.

Fitch has withdrawn Desio's Support Rating of '5' and Support
Rating Floor of 'No Floor' as they are no longer relevant to the
agency's coverage following the publication of its updated Bank
Rating Criteria on 12 November 2021. In line with the updated
criteria, Fitch has assigned Desio a Government Support Rating
(GSR) of 'No Support' (ns).

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Small Commercial Bank in Wealthy Region: Desio's IDRs and VR
reflect its improved risk profile, helped by the strengthening of
its risk governance framework, which resulted in improved asset
quality metrics, sound capitalisation and adequate funding and
liquidity profile.

The ratings also reflect a concentrated franchise and a business
model that lags higher-rated peers in terms of revenue
diversification despite recent improvements, resulting in modest
profitability levels.

Moderate Risk Profile: Desio's risk profile benefits from operating
mostly in the wealthy region of Lombardy, resulting in its large
exposure to SMEs and companies being well diversified by sector and
individual borrower. Investment guidelines result in sizeable
sovereign exposure. Risk-taking and control processes are aligned
with market standards.

De-risking Complete: The impaired loan ratio of 4% at end-2021
derives from a combination of ongoing small impaired loan sales and
conservative underwriting resulting in low default rates. Fitch
expects small impaired loan disposals to continue and compensate
for asset quality pressures from the indirect effects of the
Russian/Ukraine conflict (such as rising energy prices, higher
inflation, weaker domestic GDP growth), allowing the bank to
achieve its impaired loan target of 3.7% by 2023.

Positive Profitability Prospects: Over the past four years, fees
from the sale of assets under management and insurance products
have been increasing, contributing to revenue growth, in turn
helping to improve cost efficiency. Fitch expects this trend to
continue and the bank's operating profitability to increase at
about 1.4% of risk-weighted assets (RWAs) by 2023. This is despite
inflationary pressure affecting cost management and loan impairment
charges (LICs) remaining high.

Conservative Provisioning Approach: LICs grew by 18% in 2021,
eroding a high 54% of pre-impairment operating profitability. Fitch
expects LICs to remain substantial, reflecting the bank's
conservative stance as asset quality deterioration will be
contained.

Capitalisation Commensurate with VR: Capitalisation is scored at
'bb+' reflecting that Desio's common equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of
15.6% at end-2021 had an ample buffer over regulatory requirements
and low capital encumbrance by unreserved impaired loans.

Fitch expects capital ratios to remain broadly stable, as positive
profitability prospects should translate into improved internal
capital generation, supporting the bank's capitalisation, while
offsetting risks from an uncertain operating environment.

Large Sovereign Risk: The relatively small size of the bank's
equity base represents a negative adjustment to Fitch's implied
capitalisation and leverage score of 'bbb', as it increases
vulnerability to concentration risk arising from its large holdings
of Italian government bonds (2.5x CET1 capital at end-2021) and
potential asset quality deterioration from weaker macroeconomic
conditions.

Stable Funding and Liquidity: The bank's funding is supported by a
loyal, stable and granular customer deposit base accounting for a
robust 66% of total funding at end-2021. ECB funding is substantial
at 23% of the total but similar to other domestic banks,
utilisation is opportunistic to support interest income.
Diversification into wholesale funding sources is limited and
largely in the form of covered bonds.

No Support: Desio's GSR of 'ns' reflects Fitch's view that although
external extraordinary sovereign support is possible, it cannot be
relied upon. The 'ns' GSR reflects that senior creditors can no
longer expect to receive full extraordinary support from the
sovereign in the event that the bank becomes non-viable. The EU's
Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) and the Single
Resolution Mechanism (SRM) for eurozone banks provide a framework
for resolving banks that requires senior creditors participating in
losses, if necessary, instead of or ahead of a bank receiving
sovereign support.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- The ratings could be downgraded if Desio increases its risk
    appetite, for example due to a loosening of underwriting
    standards to pursue business growth, leading to a material
    deterioration in its asset quality and causing significant
    capital erosion, including through higher-than expected
    capital encumbrance from unreserved impaired loans.

-- In particular, the ratings could be downgraded if the impaired
    loans ratio increases above 8% and the CET1 ratio falls below
    13% without prospects of reversing in the short term.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Given its business profile, rating upside is currently
    limited. However, positive rating action would be contingent
    on an improvement in medium-term profitability prospects,
    supported by a more diversified business model and
    strengthened franchise. Operating profit sustained above 1.5%
    of RWAs would support internal capital generation, which
    combined with maintenance of current capitalisation levels
    would be supportive of an upgrade. These factors would have to
    be accompanied by an impaired loan ratio below 4% on a
    sustained basis.

-- An upgrade of the GSR would be contingent on a positive change
    in the sovereign's propensity to support the bank. In Fitch's
    view, this is highly unlikely, although not impossible.

OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: KEY RATING DRIVERS

Desio's long-term deposit rating is in line with the Long-Term IDR.
Desio does not meet the conditions under Fitch's criteria to allow
for a rating uplift given depositor preference in Italy and that
the outstanding amount of qualifying subordinated and senior debt
is below 10% of RWAs threshold that is required for an uplift in
Fitch's criteria and Fitch does not expect this to change. This is
because Desio has no binding resolution requirement in excess of
its regulatory capital requirements and its funding strategy
prioritises long-term secured debt issuance, which are not
loss-absorbing.

The short-term deposit rating of 'B' is in line with Fitch's rating
correspondence table for banks with 'BB+' long-term deposit
ratings.

OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- The long-term deposit rating would be downgraded if the bank's
    Long-Term IDR was downgraded.

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- The long-term deposit rating would be upgraded if the bank's
    Long-Term IDR was upgraded. It is also sensitive to an
    increase in the buffers of senior and junior debt, if for
    example binding resolution buffers were imposed and maintained
    by the bank.

VR ADJUSTMENTS

The Capitalisation and Leverage score of 'bb+' has been assigned
below the 'bbb' category implied score due to the following
adjustment reason: Size of capital base (negative).

The Funding and Liquidity score of 'bb+' has been assigned below
the 'bbb' category implied score due to the following adjustment
reason: Non-deposit funding (negative).

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and
Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

The highest level of ESG credit relevance for Desio is a score of
'3'. This means ESG issues are credit neutral or have only a
minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or
to the way in which they are being managed by the entity.

DEBT                      RATING                         PRIOR
----                      ------                         -----
Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A.

                      LT IDR BB+ Affirmed                 BB+
                      ST IDR B Affirmed                   B
                      Viability bb+ Affirmed              bb+
                      Support WD Withdrawn                5
                      Support Floor WD Withdrawn          NF
                      Government Support ns New Rating
long-term deposits    LT BB+ Affirmed                     BB+
short-term deposits   ST B Affirmed                       B



===================
K A Z A K H S T A N
===================

SB ALFA-BANK: S&P Keeps 'B' ICR on Watch Neg. Then Withdraws Rating
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that its long- and short-term issuer credit
ratings on the financial institutions listed, which have links to
Russia, remain on CreditWatch with negative implications.
Subsequently, S&P withdrew the ratings on the entities.

The entities affected are:

-- Cyprus-based nonoperating holding company (NOHC) FG BCS Ltd.
and its operating subsidiaries BrokerCreditService (Cyprus) Ltd.,
BrokerCreditService Structured Products PLC, and BCS Prime
Brokerage Ltd. (all rated CCC-/Watch Neg/C);

-- QIWI PLC (CCC-/Watch Neg/C); and

-- Kazakhstan-based SB Alfa-Bank JSC (B/Watch Neg/B and
kzBB+/Watch Neg/--).

S&P said, "The CreditWatch placement at the time of withdrawal
reflected our view that we could have lowered the ratings further
once we had more clarity on the issuers' technical ability and
willingness to honor their obligations in full and on time.

"Following the EU's decision on March 15, 2022, to ban the
provision of credit ratings to legal persons, entities, or bodies
established in Russia, we withdrew our outstanding ratings on
financial institutions incorporated in Russia.

"We have now decided to also withdraw our ratings on FG BCS and its
operating subsidiaries and on QIWI PLC, due to their strong links
to Russia. Despite being incorporated outside Russia, FG BCS and
QIWI PLC operate predominantly in Russia, where most of their
employees and clients are located and they derive most of their
revenues from Russian business.

"Additionally, we have also withdrawn our ratings on SB Alfa-Bank
JSC due to U.S. and U.K. full blocking sanctions introduced in
March and April 2022 on Alfa Bank and its subsidiaries, including
SB Alfa-Bank JSC."

FG BCS And Operating Subsidiaries

S&P said, "Prior to the withdrawal, our 'CCC-/C' ratings on
Cyprus-based NOHC FG BCS Ltd. and its Cyprus-based operating
subsidiaries BrokerCreditService (Cyprus) Ltd., BrokerCreditService
Structured Products PLC, and U.K.-based BCS Prime Brokerage Ltd.
reflected our view of the bleak prospects of the group's global
markets investment banking business in 2022, and the restrictions
on moving capital and liquidity from its Russian and foreign
subsidiaries to the rest of the group due to capital controls by
the Central Bank of Russia. In addition, we expect a steep downward
revaluation of the group's trading portfolio of Russian equities
and bonds, which accounted for about 40% of the consolidated
group's equity at year-end 2021: 50% of this portfolio accounts for
bonds that the group can hold to maturity, and 12% of equity is
hedged by structured products."

Qiwi PLC

S&P siad, "Prior to the withdrawal, our 'CCC-/C' ratings on Qiwi, a
Cyprus-based holding company, reflected constraints the company
faces to meet its short-term financial obligations with investors,
following deteriorated operating conditions in Russia and the
imposition of capital controls. We note that the holding company
relies on dividends being upstreamed from its Russian
subsidiaries." These dividends are now subject to capital controls
and significant currency devaluation, which might ultimately impair
Qiwi PLC's ability to meet its financial obligations.

SB Alfa-Bank JSC

S&P said, "Prior to the withdrawal, our 'B/B' global scale ratings
on Kazakhstan-based SB Alfa-Bank JSC (ABK), a subsidiary of
Russia-based Alfa Banking Group, reflected our expectations that
the deterioration in Alfa Banking Group's overall creditworthiness
would adversely affect ABK. Although we have analytically delinked
the ratings on ABK from those on Alfa Banking Group, we still
believe that the high credit stress on the parent could have a
material impact on ABK."

  Ratings List

  REMAIN ON CREDITWATCH
  
  BCS PRIME BROKERAGE LTD.
  FG BCS LTD.
  BROKERCREDITSERVICE STRUCTURED PRODUCTS PLC
  BROKERCREDITSERVICE (CYPRUS) LTD.

  Issuer Credit Rating       CCC-/Watch Neg/C

  REMAIN ON CREDITWATCH

  QIWI PLC

  Issuer Credit Rating       CCC-/Watch Neg/C

  REMAIN ON CREDITWATCH

  SB ALFA-BANK JSC

  Issuer Credit Rating       B/Watch Neg/B
  Kazakhstan National Scale  kzBB+/Watch Neg/--

  RATINGS SUBSEQUENTLY WITHDRAWN

  BCS PRIME BROKERAGE LTD.
  FG BCS LTD.
  BROKERCREDITSERVICE STRUCTURED PRODUCTS PLC
  BROKERCREDITSERVICE (CYPRUS) LTD.

  Issuer Credit Rating        NR

  RATINGS SUBSEQUENTLY WITHDRAWN

  QIWI PLC

  Issuer Credit Rating        NR

  RATINGS SUBSEQUENTLY WITHDRAWN

  SB ALFA-BANK JSC

  Issuer Credit Rating        NR
  Kazakhstan National Scale   NR

  NR--Not rated.




=====================
N E T H E R L A N D S
=====================

VEON: S&P Affirms 'CCC+' Ratings Then Withdraws Ratings on EU Ban
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' long-term ratings on telecom
operator VEON and almost all its subsidiaries.

S&P said, "We lowered our unsolicited foreign currency sovereign
ratings on Russia to 'SD/SD' from 'CC/C' and withdrew all ratings
on April 8, 2022, after the downgrade to 'CC/C' from 'CCC-/C' on
March 17, 2022; the local currency ratings were on CreditWatch
negative and the transfer and convertibility (T&C) assessment at
'CC' before the withdrawal.

"Since VEON's subsidiary PJSC VimpelCom is based in Russia and
generates all of its revenue in Russia, we cap our rating on it at
the level of our T&C assessment on Russia. As such, we lowered our
rating on VimpelCom to 'CC'. All ratings remain on CreditWatch
negative.

"We subsequently withdraw our ratings on VEON and all its
subsidiaries following the decision of the European Union (EU) to
ban the provision of credit ratings to legal persons, entities, and
bodies established in Russia.

"The rating affirmation reflects our view that the downgrade of
Russia and revision of our T&C assessment to 'CC' does not have a
direct impact on VEON's creditworthiness, since the
Netherlands-based parent company has an ample liquidity buffer.
However, we lowered our rating on VimpelCom, VEON's Russian
subsidiary, to 'CC' due to its exposure to Russia. All ratings
remain on CreditWatch negative, consistent with our T&C assessment
on Russia.

"The rating actions follow the lowering on March 17, 2022, of our
unsolicited ratings on Russia to 'CC/C' from 'CCC-/C' and downward
revision of our T&C assessment to 'CC' from 'CCC-'. We subsequently
again lowered on April 8, 2022, our foreign currency ratings on
Russia to 'SD/SD' (selective default) from 'CC/C', with the local
currency ratings remaining on CreditWatch with negative
implications and the T&C assessment at 'CC'.

"We withdraw our ratings on VEON and all its subsidiaries following
the EU's decision to ban the provision of credit ratings to legal
persons, entities, and bodies established in Russia."




=========
S P A I N
=========

BAHIA DE LAS ISLETAS: Moody's Puts 'Ca' CFR on Review for Upgrade
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has placed the Ca corporate family rating
of Bahia De Las Isletas, S.L. (Naviera or Bahia De Las Isletas) on
review for upgrade. This also includes the Ca-PD probability of
default rating (PDR). Concurrently, the limited default (LD)
designation has been removed. The outlook has been changed to
ratings under review from negative.

RATINGS RATIONALE / FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR
DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The rating action reflects a high likelihood that the company's
rating will be upgraded during the next three to six months as
visibility on current and future financial performance, capital
structure and liquidity becomes more clear. Following the
distressed exchange that took place in January this year, the
company's debt load was reduced by 42% compared with the capital
structure in place at the time of the default in December 2020.
Given limited information on the company's financial performance
during 2021 and during the first quarter of 2022, there is still a
risk that the new capital structure proves to be too leveraged.
This lack of visibility has thus been factored in and remain a
credit constraint on the company's rating. That being said, the
company's new management is focused on stabilizing the business and
improve financial performance.

Bahia De Las Isletas' debt restructuring was initiated December
2020, approved by the Commercial Court of Las Palmas de Gran
Canaria in December 2021 and executed in January this year. The
terms included a debt to equity swap, where the holders of the
EUR582 million worth of backed senior secured debt (EUR627 million
including accrued but not paid interest) exchanged its holdings for
EUR376 million worth of new senior secured floating rate notes
maturing on March 31, 2026. The remaining 40% of its claim on the
company was capitalized into equity in the form of 43.35% of the
capital (A-shares) and 57.50% of the votes (B-shares) of the
company. As part of the restructuring, the two largest creditor
shareholders were entitled to appoint 2 independent non-executive
board members out of 5 in total. Furthermore, a new CEO and a new
CFO were appointed.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Shipping
published in June 2021.

PROFILE

Headquartered in Las Palmas, Naviera is a Spanish ferry operator.
The company provides passenger and freight maritime transportation
services mainly in the Canary Islands (between islands and to/from
the Iberian peninsula) and the route Spain - Morocco. As of
September 30, 2020, Naviera operated a fleet of 26 vessels, of
which 17 are owned and the remainder leased. The company also
operates the largest land transportation business in Spain with a
fleet of more than 500 trucks. In 2020 the company reported revenue
of EUR427 million and EBIT of negative EUR147 million.

PYMES SANTANDER 15: Moody's Hikes EUR600MM B Notes Rating to Caa1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the ratings of Serie A and
Serie B notes in FONDO DE TITULIZACION PYMES SANTANDER 15.

The rating action reflects that the transaction has reached the end
of the reinvestment period:

EUR2400M Serie A Notes, Upgraded to Aa1 (sf); previously on Dec 6,
2021 Upgraded to Aa3 (sf)

EUR600M Serie B Notes, Upgraded to Caa1 (sf); previously on Dec 6,
2021 Upgraded to Caa2 (sf)

Moody's affirmed the rating of the Class C notes that had
sufficient credit enhancement to maintain their current rating:

EUR150M Serie C Notes, Affirmed Ca (sf); previously on Dec 6, 2021
Affirmed Ca (sf)

FONDO DE TITULIZACION PYMES SANTANDER 15 is a cash securitisations
of standard loans and credit lines granted by Banco Santander S.A.
(Spain) ("Santander", LT Deposit Rating: A2 / ST Deposit Rating:
P-1) to small and medium-sized enterprises ("SMEs") and
self-employed individuals located in Spain.

Maximum achievable rating is Aa1 (sf) for structured finance
transactions in Spain, driven by the corresponding local currency
country ceiling of the country.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating action is prompted by the transaction having reached the
end of the reinvestment period in January 2022.

Revision of Key Collateral Assumptions:

As part of the rating action, Moody's reassessed its default
probability and recovery rate assumptions for the portfolio
reflecting the collateral performance to date.

The performance of the transaction has continued during the last
year. Total delinquencies have increased in the past year, with 90
days plus arrears currently standing at 0.36% of current pool
balance. Cumulative defaults currently stand at 0.36% of original
pool balance up from 0.10% a year earlier.

For FONDO DE TITULIZACION PYMES SANTANDER 15, the current default
probability is 9% of the current portfolio balance and the
assumption for the fixed recovery rate is 30%. Moody's has
maintained the CoV at 46.3%, which, combined with the revised key
collateral assumptions, corresponds to a portfolio credit
enhancement of 23%.

End of reinvestment period:

The transaction reached the end of the reinvestment period in
January 2022. Moody's has assumed that the deal will benefit from a
shorter amortization profile.

Increase in Available Credit Enhancement since closing:

Sequential amortization led to the increase in the credit
enhancement available in this transaction.

For instance, the credit enhancement for the most senior tranche
affected by today's rating action increased to 26.8% from 25% since
closing. Serie B credit enhancement has increased to 5.4% from 5%
in the same period.

Counterparty Exposure

The rating actions took into consideration the notes' exposure to
relevant counterparties, such as servicer or account bank.

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Moody's Global
Approach to Rating SME Balance Sheet Securitizations published in
July 2021.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

Factors or circumstances that could lead to an upgrade of the
ratings include (1) performance of the underlying collateral that
is better than Moody's expected, (2) an increase in available
credit enhancement and (3) improvements in the credit quality of
the transaction counterparties and (4) a decrease in sovereign
risk.

Factors or circumstances that could lead to a downgrade of the
ratings include (1) an increase in sovereign risk, 2) performance
of the underlying collateral that is worse than Moody's expected,
(3) deterioration in the notes' available credit enhancement and
(4) deterioration in the credit quality of the transaction
counterparties.



=============
U K R A I N E
=============

[*] UKRAINE: Seeks Seizure, Sale of Russian Assets
--------------------------------------------------
Benjamin Robertson at Bloomberg News reports that Ukraine is
pushing allied countries to seize and sell Russian assets including
oil tankers, so that the proceeds can be used to pay for the
rebuilding of destroyed cities and infrastructure.

According to Bloomberg, Oleg Ustenko, chief economic adviser to
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, said negotiations are
under way with various countries for the seizure and sale of the
assets.  He declined to identify which countries he and his team
have engaged, adding that several allied governments are preparing
a "mass attack on all major assets."

Mr. Ustenko said in a telephone interview Ukraine has suffered more
than US$1 trillion in physical damage since the invasion by Russian
forces began in February, Bloomberg relates.  International
sanctions directed at Moscow have frozen about US$300 billion in
Russian central bank assets, he said, noting that Russian state
officials and senior businessmen have upwards of US$1.5 trillion
held overseas, according to Bloomberg.

"We do believe we can arrest their assets abroad," Bloomberg quotes
Mr. Ustenko as saying.  This includes Russia's fleet of oil
tankers, which he estimated has a value of around US$5 billion.
"We know it is possible to find these assets hidden all over the
world."

Most countries haven't banned shipments of Russian crude, but many
companies have been wary about buying the country's oil, Bloomberg
discloses.  European Union diplomats last week signed off on a
sanctions package that, among other things, prevents most Russian
ships from entering the bloc, Bloomberg recounts.   

While the U.S., U.K., EU and others have ramped up sanctions
against Russia, any effort to then sell seized assets and hand the
money to Ukraine will likely run into lengthy legal challenges,
Bloomberg notes.  It could also risk retaliatory seizures of
multinational-owned businesses in Russia, Bloomberg states.




===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

ANGEL CONTRACTING: Director Faces Six-Year Disqualification
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Insolvency Service on April 14 disclosed that Stephen Joseph
John Mason, 45, from Edinburgh has been disqualified as a director
for six years.

He was director of Angel Contracting Ltd, a recruitment agency
specialising in providing contractors to the construction industry.
The company was incorporated in 2017 but went into liquidation two
years later.

At this point, the Insolvency Practitioner made repeated requests
for the company's accounts and other records, in order to carry out
their statutory duties to determine whether there was any
misconduct that had led to the company's failure and debts.

The records were not forthcoming and the subsequent Insolvency
Service investigation therefore could not determine whether
expenditure of nearly GBP5.5 million from the company's bank
account was legitimate business spending.  The investigation
identified £16,500 paid to an unknown individual, cash withdrawals
totalling nearly GBP6,000 and GBP3,000 in cheque payments.

Similarly, it was not possible to confirm that the income, also of
nearly GBP5.5 million, recorded in the company's bank account, was
from genuine business sales.

The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
accepted a disqualification undertaking from Mr. Mason after he
accepted failing to maintain or preserve adequate accounting
records.  His ban commences on April 4, 2022.

The disqualification undertaking prevents him from directly, or
indirectly, becoming involved in the promotion, formation or
management of a company, without the permission of the court.

Rob Clarke, Chief Investigator at The Insolvency Service said:

"Companies are under a legal duty to account for their income and
expenditure and fulfilling that duty is a key component of the role
of a director; there is no place in the corporate arena for those
who neglect their responsibilities in this area.

"All too often the lack of records to explain transactions is used
to cover up other, more serious misconduct and we cannot determine
whether that was the case at Angel Contracting, a fact which is
reflected in the lengthy ban now in place."


EVRAZ PLC: S&P Lowers Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating to 'CC'
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer credit ratings on
the following five corporate entities, to 'CC' from 'CCC-':

-- Borets International Ltd.
-- Eurasia Drilling Company Ltd.
-- Evraz PLC.
-- X5 Retail Group N.V.
-- Yandex N.V.

All ratings remained on CreditWatch with negative implications and
were subsequently withdrawn.

S&P said, "The downgrades of the five entities incorporated outside
Russia follow recent actions on Russia. First, we lowered on March
17, 2022, our ratings on the sovereign to 'CC/C' from 'CCC-/C' and
revised downward our T&C to 'CC' from 'CCC-'. Second, we lowered on
April 8, 2022, our foreign currency ratings on Russia to 'SD/SD'
(selective default) from 'CC/C', with the local currency ratings
remaining on CreditWatch with negative implications and the T&C
assessment at 'CC'.

"We used the same analytical approach for the five corporates as
that for other companies incorporated in Russia. A country T&C
assessment reflects S&P Global Ratings' view of the likelihood of a
sovereign restricting nonsovereign access to foreign exchange
needed to satisfy the nonsovereign's debt service obligations.

"We lowered our foreign currency ratings on the five companies in
line with our T&C assessment, given the numerous currency
restrictions that were imposed by the Central Bank of Russia. This
reflects the increasing reported difficulties of companies meeting
debt-service payments to their bondholders in foreign currency. The
payment difficulties stem from international sanctions that reduce
Russia's available foreign exchange reserves and restrict its
access to the global financial system, markets, and infrastructure.
They also follow the series of measures rolled out by the Russian
authorities aimed at shielding the ruble while preserving remaining
usable reserve buffers. All these measures have restricted the
ability of nonresident domestic and foreign currency bondholders to
receive interest, principal payments, or both, on time and in full.
Although the five companies are incorporated outside Russia, they
may in our view face the same payment difficulties as peers
incorporated in Russia, since most of their operations are in that
country.

"We also lowered our local currency issuer credit ratings on the
five companies because we believe that their capacity to service
obligations in rubles may also be significantly disrupted in case
of a default on foreign currency obligations. In addition, our
ratings on Russia-based banks were 'CC', and on CreditWatch
negative, before their withdrawal on March 31, 2022. This indicates
high vulnerability to nonpayment from the local banking sector, on
which domestic corporates--even those with no market debt or
foreign currency liabilities outstanding--rely for day-to-day
business activities.

"Our 'CC/C' ratings reflect our expectation that a default is a
virtual certainty, regardless of the time to default. The
CreditWatch negative status on the long- and short-term ratings
indicates that we could lower the foreign currency issuer credit
ratings to 'SD' (selective default) if a company fails to make a
debt-service payment in accordance with the terms of an obligation,
and if we do not expect such payment to be made within an
applicable grace period. In addition, we would lower the local
currency ratings to 'SD' if we were to assess that some nonresident
bondholders are unable to access debt-service payments on local
bond/bank debts within an applicable grace period.

"Following the EU's decision on March 15, 2022, to ban the
provision of credit ratings to legal persons, entities, or bodies
established in Russia, we withdrew our outstanding ratings on
corporate entities incorporated in Russia.

"We have now also withdrawn our ratings on five corporate entities
with large exposure to Russia. Despite being incorporated outside
Russia, these companies operate predominantly in Russia, where most
of their manufacturing/production facilities, employees, and/or
clients are located. We are also withdrawing our ratings on these
companies' Russian subsidiaries or financing vehicles, where
relevant."

  Ratings List

  DOWNGRADED; RATINGS WITHDRAWN   
                        FINAL       TO              FROM
  BORETS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
  BORETS FINANCE DAC

  Issuer Credit Rating   NR    CC/Watch Neg/--   CCC-/Watch Neg/--

  EURASIA DRILLING CO. LTD.

  Issuer Credit Rating   NR    CC/Watch Neg/C    CCC-/Watch Neg/C

  EVRAZ PLC
  EVRAZHOLDING FINANCE LLC

  Issuer Credit Rating   NR    CC/Watch Neg/--   CCC-/Watch Neg/--

  X5 RETAIL GROUP N.V.
  X5 FINANCE OOO

  Issuer Credit Rating   NR    CC/Watch Neg/--   CCC-/Watch Neg/--

  YANDEX N.V.

  Issuer Credit Rating   NR    CC/Watch Neg/--   CCC-/Watch Neg/--


LITA GROUP: Files for Administration with High Court
----------------------------------------------------
Haydn Lewis at The Press reports that cleaning staff at a top York
school are facing an uncertain future after their employer went in
to administration.

Lita Group Facilities Management employ cleaners on contract at
Fulford School in York.

The firm, which has its office base in London, has filed for
administration with the High Court leaving employees facing
uncertainty, The Press relates.

The union Unison, which represents some of the employees, said
cleaners at other city schools may also be affected, The Press
notes.

According to The Press, a spokesman said: "It's shocking news that
Lita Group FM has gone into administration and our members at
Fulford School are owed eight weeks' wages."

"We have urged the school to do the right thing and make sure they
are paid."

But the school say they have paid the company the wages in good
faith.

Steve Lewis is the CEO at South York Multi-Academy Trust, which
runs the school. He said: "We are saddened to hear that the Lita
Group has gone into administration.

"We are aware that two fortnightly wage payments have been up to
two weeks late.

"Throughout this difficult time for their staff at the school we
have been in regular contact with Lita and made very clear advocacy
for their staff to be paid.

"We have kept in daily contact with their cleaning staff at Fulford
School and supported them in the best way we can.

"The cleaning staff are an integral part of the school community
and we expect their employer to pay them on time.

"Our contract is with Lita Group.

"We have paid all monies owed to them on time with a full and
reasonable expectation that they will pay their employees.

"Following the announcement of Lita's administration we are
urgently looking at a way forward that best supports the school and
Lita's cleaning staff."


MORRISONS: Moody's Downgrades Rating to 'B1', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned a corporate family rating of
B1 and B1-PD probability of default rating to Market Holdco 3
Limited, a holding company formed to effect the acquisition of Wm
Morrison Supermarkets plc (Morrisons), the UK's fourth largest
grocery retailer by revenue, by Clayton Dubilier & Rice, LLC
(CD&R). This rating action concludes the review for downgrade
initiated on July 07, 2021 and downgraded and further extended on
December 13, 2021. The outlook on all ratings, except on Safeway
Limited's ratings which have been withdrawn, is stable.

The effective downgrade of Morrisons' rating to B1 from Ba1 was
triggered by the completion of review for downgrade following the
acquisition of the entirety of the company by CD&R for an
enterprise value of GBP9.8 billion. The acquisition was financed
through a combination of equity capital, including ordinary and
preference shares, and bridge debt facilities that are expected to
be refinanced through long term debt.

As part of the same rating action, Moody's withdraws the Ba1 CFR
and Ba1-PD PDR of Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc as well as the
(P)Ba1 backed senior unsecured MTN programme of Safeway Limited.

Moody's has also downgraded to (P)B1 from the (P)Ba1 backed senior
unsecured MTN programme, and to B1 from the Ba1 backed senior
unsecured ratings of all the bonds issued under the programme by Wm
Morrison Supermarkets plc. The Rating Agency understands that
around GBP82 million of the bonds remain outstanding following the
completion of a tender offer launched by CD&R. The B1 rating of
these notes is based on the successful completion of the envisaged
refinancing.

The Transaction is subject to approvals by the Competition and
Markets Authority (CMA) and by the Financial Conduct Authority
(FCA) with expected closing in the first half of 2022.

The rating actions reflect:

An initial estimated leverage of 7.9x as of January 31, 2022 on a
Moody's-adjusted basis pro-forma for the completion of the
acquisition, with expectations of de-leveraging by around 2x over
the next two fiscal years through EBITDA improvements driven by the
lower pandemic related costs, the recovery of lost profits
(cafeterias and food-to-go), ongoing efficiency measures
(automation, digital platform and McColl's conversions), and public
listing savings

Morrisons' established market position in the stable UK grocery
sector, its significant scale and significant freehold property
ownership

The very competitive nature of the UK grocery market and risks
related to the execution of the planned efficiency programmes

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B1 CFR of Market Holdco 3 Limited reflects its entrenched
market position in the stable, albeit competitive, UK grocery
sector, its relatively greater exposure to stable food sales
compared to peers, and its experienced management team. It also
considers the company's relatively smaller scale and market share
compared to the other three "Big Four" UK grocers and to the
challenges posed by the continued, albeit slower, growth of the
discounters in the UK grocery sector.

The company's performance since the beginning of the pandemic has
been resilient but the exceptional costs incurred to protect
customers and staff as well as the lost revenues during the
lockdown months have significantly affected its profits. Morrisons
has grown its revenues in fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022 (ended
February 1), particularly online, demonstrating the resilience of
its food business and relatively limited exposure to general
merchandise and clothing which have been more severely affected by
the coronavirus pandemic. However, the exceptional costs and the
lost profits incurred during the last 12 months have depressed the
company's EBITDA, which has remained well below normal levels
leading to increased leverage.

The total debt financing requirement for the acquisition of
Morrisons is around GBP7.0 billion, including outstanding debt and
lease liabilities, which represents 7.9x Moody's adjusted pro forma
EBITDA for the fiscal 2022 ended February 1. This leverage is set
to improve below 6x over the next 12-18 months in Moody's base
case. The improvement will be driven by EBITDA growth as a result
of lower pandemic related costs including the recovery of lost
profits (cafeterias and food-to-go) and by ongoing margin
improvement initiatives. The latter include increased manufacturing
automation, online store picking improvements, McColls/Morrisons
Daily conversions and other synergies.

The company's trading outlook is stable, with ongoing competitive
pressures in an increasingly inflationary environment. Market share
shifts in the UK grocery sector will be limited over the next 12-18
months, with the online and convenience formats likely to grow
further. Morrisons has been recently catching up in both formats
and its strategy is geared towards continued expansion into these
segments.

Moody's does not view Morrisons' corporate governance structure
under the new ownership as a major risk factor as the company has a
history of complying with financial, legal and regulatory
requirements as a listed entity. However, governance risks
considered in Morrisons' credit profile include financial policies
which are likely to maintain relatively high leverage.

LIQUIDITY

Moody's considers Morrisons' liquidity profile to be good,
supported by an undrawn GBP1.0 billion RCF and still material
unencumbered assets upon completion of the envisaged refinancing,
and a pro forma cash balance of GBP249 million as at January 31,
2022. The company is expected to generate significant positive cash
flows after debt service costs before dividend distributions on an
annual basis.

STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS

The outstanding notes are rated in line with the CFR reflecting
their pari passu ranking with the secured debt in the envisaged
capital structure. Secured debt ranks ahead of GBP1.2 billion
backed senior unsecured private notes, the amount which is not
sufficient to rate the secured debt above the CFR.

OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that Morrisons
will gradually reduce Moody's-adjusted leverage over the next 12-18
months from its high initial level. In addition, the stable outlook
also assumes adequate liquidity and no meaningful sale and lease
back transactions that could negatively impact on leverage.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if Moody's-adjusted leverage reduces
sustainably below 5.75x, with a clear financial policy in line with
lower leverage. An upgrade would also require a material increase
in free cash flow, with free cash flow to debt of in mid
single-digits in percentage terms. An upgrade would also require
meaningful like-for-like revenue and EBITDA growth and adequate
liquidity.

The ratings could be downgraded if leverage fails to reduce below
6.5x on a Moody's-adjusted basis over the next 12-18 months, or if
the company generates negative free cash flows. A downgrade could
ensue also in case of material execution issues or if liquidity
concerns arise or in case of significant operational
underperformance.

LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS

Downgrades, previously placed on review for downgrade:

Issuer: Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc

BACKED Senior Unsecured MTN programme, Downgraded to (P)B1 from
(P)Ba1

BACKED Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to B1
from Ba1

Assignments:

Issuer: Market Bidco Finco Plc

BACKED Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned B1

Issuer: Market Bidco Limited

BACKED Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B1

Issuer: Market Holdco 3 Limited

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B1-PD

LT Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B1

Issuer: Market Parent Finco Plc

BACKED Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned B3

Confirmations, previously placed on review for downgrade:

Issuer: Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc

BACKED Other Short Term, Confirmed at (P)NP

Withdrawals, previously placed on review for downgrade:

Issuer: Safeway Limited

BACKED Senior Unsecured MTN programme, Withdrawn , previously
rated (P)Ba1

Issuer: Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc

Probability of Default Rating, Withdrawn, previously rated Ba1-PD

LT Corporate Family Rating, Withdrawn, previously rated Ba1

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Safeway Limited

Outlook, Changed To Ratings Withdrawn From Ratings Under Review

Issuer: Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Ratings Under Review

Issuer: Market Holdco 3 Limited

Outlook, Assigned Stable

Issuer: Market Bidco Finco Plc

Outlook, Assigned Stable

Issuer: Market Bidco Limited

Outlook, Assigned Stable

Issuer: Market Parent Finco Plc

Outlook, Assigned Stable

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail
published in November 2021.

COMPANY PROFILE

Morrisons is the fourth-largest grocer by sales in the UK, behind
Tesco Plc (Baa3 stable), J Sainsbury plc and Bellis Finco PLC
(Asda, Ba3 stable). The company is focused on fresh food at
affordable prices, and this positioning is supported by its
significant manufacturing capabilities. The company generated
revenue of GBP18.6 billion in the last twelve months ended August
1, 2021, of which GBP3.7 billion or around 20% of total related to
fuel sales.

PETROPAVLOVSK PLC: Mulls Sale Following Sanctions Against Russia
----------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Hume at The Financial Times reports that Russian gold producer
Petropavlovsk PLC has warned investors that they could be wiped out
as the wave of sanctions against Moscow leaves the group struggling
to refinance its debt.

According to the FT, the company said on April 14 that it was
considering putting itself up for sale because "in the present
circumstance" it would be "very challenging" to pay off a US$304
million convertible bond due in November.

"The group has limited cash reserves outside Russia.  There are
legal restrictions in place in Russia which limit the group's
ability to transfer cash out of Russia," the FT quotes the company
as saying in a statement.

As pressures on the company mount, Petropavlovsk said it had
appointed restructuring specialist AlixPartners to examine options
including the sale of its "entire interests in its operating
subsidiaries as soon as practically possible", the FT relates.

"It is not currently clear what return, if any, may be secured for
shareholders or the holders of the bonds or notes as a result of
this process," the company warned.

Petropavlovsk, which mines gold in Russia's Far East region,
cautioned last month that it had been prevented from making a loan
interest payment to its main lender Gazprombank, which has been
targeted by UK sanctions, the FT recounts.

The miner revealed on April 14 that US$9.5 million of debt due on
another credit facility with Gazprombank had not been paid "as a
consequence of the regulations", the FT discloses.

At the turn of the year, the company had almost US$600 million of
outstanding debt, the FT notes.

The company is one of the few Russian groups with shares still
trading in London.  It was once one of the biggest gold miners
listed in London, and until recently was a member of the FTSE 250
index.


PINE DEVELOPMENTS: Former Pontins Holiday Camp Put Up for Sale
--------------------------------------------------------------
Liz Coates at Great Yarmouth Mercury reports that a former Pontins
holiday camp is up for sale on property website Rightmove after the
business behind its redevelopment floundered.

The sale comes after Pine Developments collapsed into
administration blaming the failure of a lending company, Great
Yarmouth Mercury notes.

The prominent site in Beach Road, Hemsby, is being marketed as a
commercial development comprising 188 homes and 88 holiday
cottages, a shop, leisure centre, gym, and spa, Great Yarmouth
Mercury discloses.

It is described as being level and broadly rectangular by
London-based agent Lambert Smith Hampton on behalf of joint
administrators FRP Advisory, Great Yarmouth Mercury states.

Pine Developments, headed by businessman Graham Avery, purchased
the former Pontins site on February 19, 2019, for GBP4,000,000,
Great Yarmouth Mercury recounts.

Mr. Avery, as cited by Great Yarmouth Mercury, said the company's
collapse revolved around the failure of a lender it had borrowed
money from.

The 22-acre site was closed and made secure at the end of last
month, Great Yarmouth Mercury relays.  Some local contractors still
had unpaid invoices and equipment they could not access, according
to Great Yarmouth Mercury.


PIPELINE ENGINEERING: Enters Administration, 83 Jobs Affected
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Keighley at Business Live reports that a North Yorkshire
supplier of pipeline maintenance services to the global oil and gas
sector has fallen into administration with the loss of 83 jobs.

According to Business Live, administrators from Kroll were
appointed to Catterick-based Pipeline Engineering & Supply Co.
Limited after its parent company Circor International Ltd failed to
find a buyer for the business, which it says had seen "accounting
irregularities".

Circor announced it wanted to exit the Pipeline Engineering &
Supply Co business in March after finding the irregularities --
which it said appeared to account for balance sheet and income
statement entries in the range of GBP26.7 million (US$35 million)
to GBP34.3 million (US$45 million) of pre-tax income on a
cumulative basis over a period of at least five years, Business
Live relates.

A review of the irregularities had been carried out by an outside
law firm and a forensic accounting firm with oversight from the New
York Stock Exchange-listed firm's audit committee, Business Live
discloses.  The administration does not impact the remainder of
Circor's operations in the UK, Business Live notes.

"The business was loss making as its cost base and infrastructure
were not aligned to revenues," Business Live quotes Jimmy Saunders,
joint administrator at Kroll, as saying.

"The group has made substantial investment into the company but
together with the current economic uncertainty and cost inflation
in manufacturing the group was unfortunately unable to continue to
provide financial support."

Pipeline Engineering accounted for about 3% of Circor's revenue in
2020 and has ceased trading with immediate effect, and the
administrators said they were providing support to affected
employees.

The latest set of accounts for Pipeline Engineering at Companies
House show it made a pre-tax loss of GBP2 million in 2019, on
turnover of GBP16.5 million.


STUDIO TRI: Clogau Left Out of Pocket Following Administration
--------------------------------------------------------------
Owen Hughes at Business Live reports that the boss of Clogau -- the
famous Welsh gold jewellery brand -- says he is "saddened" after a
Twitter post from a band saying they had been left out of pocket
following an advertising campaign.

Art rock group HMS Morris recorded "Dawel Nos" for the Clogau
Christmas advert in a campaign last year organised by Cardiff based
Studio Tri Ltd, trading as S3 Advertising, Business Live
discloses.

But after being hit hard by the pandemic Studio Tri went into
administration in December, Business Live recounts.  

Leonard Curtis were appointed as administrator and released a
statement of affairs saying it is "unlikely" there will be
sufficient funds to pay unsecured creditors, Business Live relates.
Clogau said they had paid their bill for the campaign, Business
Live notes.

Business Live contacted Clogau and boss Ben Roberts said: "We're
aware and saddened by social media posts relating to past marketing
campaigns that we've run in conjunction with S3 Advertising.
Currently, we're waiting for the proper legal process to conclude
to understand the full impact of S3's administration and throughout
this period we're maintaining dialogue with various suppliers that
have been negatively impacted.  Our upcoming summer campaign will
feature content that has been created by some of these
organisations as we continue to work with them wherever possible."


WILLIAM MASON: Director Faces 10-Year Disqualification
------------------------------------------------------
The Insolvency Service on April 11 disclosed that wine investor
from Wymondham, Norfolk, has been disqualified from being a
director after he abused more than GBP445,000 of investors' money.

William Mason Fine Wines Limited was incorporated in March 1997 and
traded as an alcohol wholesaler from premises on Church Street, in
Great Ellingham, Norfolk.

William Geoffrey Mason (54) was the director of the company before
the alcohol wholesaler entered into liquidation and was wound-up in
November 2020.

The company's liquidation, however, triggered an investigation by
the Insolvency Service, which found that for more than 18 years,
Mr. Mason caused the alcohol wholesaler to trade with a lack of
commercial probity.

Investigators uncovered that William Mason Fine Wines operated a
wine investment scheme, purchasing and storing wines on behalf of
the company's clients.

Between 2001 and 2019, investors made payments worth GBP445,000 and
Mr. Mason corresponded with investors, providing stock certificates
and in some cases arranging partial return of their wine or funds.

Investigators, however, found that in a majority of cases, Mr.
Mason caused the company not to purchase the wines and where wine
was purchased, the company disposed of the alcohol without the
agreement of the investors.  At the point of liquidation, William
Mason Fine Wines Limited held no wine in stock.

Mr. Mason's ban became effective on February 22, 2022 and the
disqualification prevents him from directly, or indirectly,
becoming involved in the promotion, formation or management of a
company, without the permission of the court.

David Argyle, Deputy Head of Insolvent Investigations, said:

"Several of the investors that have lost their investments were
good friends with William Mason and it was this friendship that
made them believe they could trust him.

"10 years is a significant disqualification and sends a stark
warning to directors who think they can abuse their investors that
we will pursue the strictest restrictions and remove them from the
corporate arena."




===============
X X X X X X X X
===============

[*] BOOK REVIEW: Bankruptcy and Secured Lending in Cyberspace
-------------------------------------------------------------
Author: Warren E. Agin
Publisher: Bowne Publishing Co.
List price: $225.00
Review by Gail Owens Hoelscher

Red Hat Inc. finds itself with a high of 151 5/8 and low of 20 over
the last 12 months! Microstrategy Inc. has roller-coasted from a
high of 333 to a low of 7 over the same period! Just when the IPO
boom is imploding and high-technology companies are running out of
cash, Warren Agin comes out with a guide to the legal issues of the
cyberage.

The word "cyberspace" did not appear in the Merriam-Webster
Dictionary until 1986, defined as "the on-line world of computer
networks." The word "Internet" showed up that year as well, as "an
electronic communications network that connects computer networks
and organizational computer facilities around the world."
Cyberspace has been leading a kaleidoscopic parade ever since, with
the legal profession striding smartly in rhythm. There is no
definition for the word "cyberassets" in the current
Merriam-Webster. Fortunately, Bankruptcy and Secured Lending in
Cyberspace tells us what cyberassets are and lays out in meticulous
detail how to address them, not only for troubled technology
companies, but for all companies with websites and domain names.
Cyberassets are primarily websites and domain names, but also
include technology contracts and licenses. There are four types of
assets embodied in a website: content, hardware, the Internet
connection, and software. The website's content is its fundamental
asset and may include databases, text, pictures, and video and
sound clips. The value of a website depends largely on the traffic
it generates.

A domain name provides the mechanism to reach the information
provided by a company on its website, or find the products or
services the company is selling over the Internet. Examples are
Amazon.com, bankrupt.com, and "swiggartagin.com." Determining the
value of a domain name is comparable to valuing trademark rights.
Domain names can come at a high price! Compaq Computer Corp. paid
Alta Vista Technology Inc. more than $3 million for "Altavista.com"
when it developed its AltaVista search engine.

The subject matter covered in this book falls into three groups:
the Internet's effect on the practice of bankruptcy law; the ways
substantive bankruptcy law handles the impact of cyberspace on
basic concepts and procedures; and issues related to cyberassets as
secured lending collateral.

The book includes point-by-point treatment of the effect of
cyberassets on venue and jurisdiction in bankruptcy proceedings;
electronic filing and access to official records and pleadings in
bankruptcy cases; using the Internet for communications and
noticing in bankruptcy cases; administration of bankruptcy estates
with cyberassets; selling bankruptcy estate assets over the
Internet; trading in bankruptcy claims over the Internet; and
technology contracts and licenses under the bankruptcy codes. The
chapters on secured lending detail technology escrow agreements for
cyberassets; obtaining and perfecting security interests for
cyberassets; enforcing rights against collateral for cyberassets;
and bankruptcy concerns for the secured lender with regard to
cyberassets.

The book concludes with chapters on Y2K and bankruptcy; revisions
in the Uniform Commercial Code in the electronic age; and a
compendium of bankruptcy and secured lending resources on the
Internet. The appendix consists of a comprehensive set of forms for
cyberspace-related bankruptcy issues and cyberasset lending
transactions. The forms include bankruptcy orders authorizing a
domain name sale; forms for electronic filing of documents;
bankruptcy motions related to domain names; and security agreements
for Web sites.

Bankruptcy and Secured Lending in Cyberspace is a well-written,
succinct, and comprehensive reference for lending against
cyberassets and treating cyberassets in bankruptcy cases.



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2022.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *