/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/210719.mbx
T R O U B L E D C O M P A N Y R E P O R T E R
E U R O P E
Monday, July 19, 2021, Vol. 22, No. 137
Headlines
F R A N C E
FINANCIERE LABEYRIE: S&P Assigns 'B' LT Issuer Credit Rating
I R E L A N D
MONTMARTRE EURO 2020-2: Fitch Rates F-R Notes Final 'B-'
MONTMARTRE EURO 2020-2: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating to F-R Notes
OAK HILL III: Moody's Affirms B3 Rating on EUR12MM Class F-R Notes
PERIOD DOOR: In Liquidation After Rescue Efforts Collapse
SORRENTO PARK: Moody's Upgrades EUR17.5MM Class E Notes to Ba3
TORO EUROPEAN 3: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating to Class F Notes
TORO EUROPEAN 3: S&P Assigns Prelim. B- Rating on Cl. F Notes
VOYA EURO II: Fitch Assigns Final B- Rating to F-R Tranche
[*] IRELAND: New Rescue Process for Small Businesses Passed
L U X E M B O U R G
GARFUNKELUX HOLDCO 2: Fitch Affirms B+ LT IDR, Outlook Now Positive
S P A I N
EL CORTE: S&P Affirms 'BB+' Long-Term ICR, Outlook Negative
LUNA III: Fitch Assigns FirstTime 'BB(EXP)' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
LUNA III: S&P Assigns Prelim 'BB-' Long-Term ICR, Outlook Stable
RMBS SANTANDER 7: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to EUR530MM B Notes
U N I T E D K I N G D O M
A & A LTD: Brothers Banned from Acting as Company Directors
GREENSILL CAPITAL: Shop Direct Holdings to Repay Debt in Full
PINNACLE BIDCO: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR, Alters Outlook to Stable
POUNDSTRETCHER: Estate Shrinks by 75 Stores Following CVA
PRODIGY FINANCE CM2021-1: Moody's Gives Ba1 Rating to Cl. D Notes
SECOND HOME: Obtains Waiver from Lender After Covenant Breach
X X X X X X X X
[*] BOND PRICING: For the Week July 12 to July 16, 2021
- - - - -
===========
F R A N C E
===========
FINANCIERE LABEYRIE: S&P Assigns 'B' LT Issuer Credit Rating
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' long-term issuer credit rating
to Financiere Labeyrie Fine Foods, France-based gourmet foods
producer Labeyrie's holding company, and its 'B' issue rating and
'3' recovery rating to the proposed senior secured term loan B
(TLB).
The stable outlook reflects its view that Labeyrie will improve its
earnings despite potential inflation of raw material prices and
some one-off costs, with S&P Global Ratings-adjusted margins
improving to 8.0%-8.5% in the next 12 months, enabling it to post
solid cash flow and maintain cash interest coverage of funds from
operations (FFO) of 3.5x-4.0x.
S&P said, "We assume substantial deleveraging toward close to 8.0x
(including PIK debt) and 6.0x-6.5x (excluding PIK debt) by year-end
2022 (June 30), and positive cash flow, will support the 'B'
rating. Labeyrie plans to refinance debt, repay EUR10 million of
PIK debt and fund about EUR10 million of transaction costs by
issuing a EUR455 million TLB and EUR65 million RCF, assumed to be
undrawn at closing; and using EUR20 million of cash on balance
sheet. Given that we treat the PIK instrument as debt as per our
criteria, we project these issuances will lead to an S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt-to-EBITDA ratio of about 8.5x (including PIK
instruments) and 6.5x-7.0x (excluding PIK instruments) for fiscal
year-end 2021, which remain high for the rating category. However,
we assume substantial EBITDA growth in fiscal 2022 from improved
underlying performance, supporting deleveraging toward the S&P
Global Ratings-adjusted debt-to-EBITDA ratio of around 8.0x
(including PIK instruments) and 6.0x-6.5x (excluding PIK
instruments). At the same time, we assume Labeyrie will maintain
some headroom under its other key credit metrics. We forecast FFO
cash interest coverage of 3.0x-3.5x in 2021, before improving to
3.5x-4.0x in 2022 and healthy positive free operating cash flow
(FOCF) of EUR10 million-EUR20 million (after rent payments) on
average over the period, supporting the 'B' ratings. Our adjusted
debt calculation for 2021 totals EUR690 million and comprises the
proposed EUR455 million term loan, EUR20 million-EUR25 million of
other debt (including mainly other bank facilities), EUR22 million
of lease-related debt (including the IFRS-16 impact), and about
EUR143 million in shareholder loans, which we view as akin to debt.
We also add about EUR35 million of debt related to the factoring of
receivables and EUR12 million of pension obligations. We do not net
cash from our S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt calculation.
"We believe the group will achieve material EBITDA growth in fiscal
2022, despite headwinds from the avian flu, some residual impact
from COVID-19, potential inflation in raw material costs, and some
exceptional costs. This will be more than offset by Labeyrie's
strong cost control, continued pricing power across most
categories, and improved industrial performance. This was
highlighted by the group reporting margins increase by 1.9% for the
10 months to April 2021, compared with the same period a year
earlier. We assume that one-off costs will remain relatively high,
at around EUR11 million in fiscal 2021 and EUR9 million in fiscal
2022, reflecting the closure of its Wishes and Pistache sites, but
we assume it will generate up to EUR3 million in annual savings
thereafter. As a result, we assume the group's S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted margins will improve to 8.0%-8.5% in 2022 from
7.9% in 2021, benefiting from the gradual normalization of
COVID-19-affected segments, cost savings benefits from ongoing
operational improvement efforts, and the group's ability to pass on
raw material prices increase to its customers in the wake of
potential inflation of salmon prices. Labeyrie's gourmet food
business is highly focused on the seafood market, from which it
derives almost 70% of total sales, and is therefore structurally
exposed to raw material price fluctuations and its ability to pass
through cost increases to major retailers. This exposes the company
to decreased profitability during periods of price hikes, such as
in 2016, a year affected by record-high salmon prices. However,
this is mitigated in our view by the group's record of passing raw
material price hikes to customers and engagement in some
pass-through contracts, typically for one-year periods. Given the
limited headroom under the ratings, we will monitor closely the
delivery of envisaged EBITDA improvements.
"We assume Labeyrie's investment in sustainable sourcing and
innovation will benefit its mix and help it face changing food
consumption preferences in mature markets, where it has most
exposure. The group recently refocused its strategy on increasing
vegetarian offers, which are currently limited to 15% of its sales,
along with developing international sales and diversifying its
distribution channels including e-commerce. In fact, Labeyrie's
digital sales increased to 11.8% of U.K.- and France-branded sales,
compared with 5.5% in fiscal 2020. We consider the strategy refocus
positive because the group will likely devote more resources to its
core brands and develop new products to address new consumer
trends. It is targeting to improve the share of plant-based
categories to 25% in the near term, which are high margin products
and benefit from attractive growth prospects (6.5% growth over
2016-2020 for appetizers, including Blini and spreadable).
Furthermore, it should benefit from better pricing power in
international markets, where it will focus on developing its
branded offerings. Earnings will be further supported by the
group's recent exit from lower-margin businesses. Labeyrie is
improving the traceability of its products sourcing and
participates in various initiatives to ensure higher-quality
products, and we believe its ongoing investment will position it
well to face health and wellness trends. Although the group has
diversified away from the foie gras segment, which represents close
to 7% of sales, we believe this category remains subject to
increasing customer awareness of animal mistreatment, which could
affect sales.
"We factor some volatility in working capital needs following the
recent avian flu outbreak. Still, we assume a lower impact on
earnings compared with previous avian flu outbreaks because the
group made significant investment in sanitary requirements and food
security in recent years to comply with stricter regulatory
measures. As well, the outbreak occurred after the seasonal peak of
Christmas, protecting foie gras volumes for 2021 somewhat. As a
result, we assume FOCF will continue being positive over the
forecast horizon, benefiting from continued working capital
discipline and supported by the group's efforts in optimizing
inventory levels. This will help mitigate volatility arising from
the avian flu episode as well as upcoming investments in growth
capital expenditure (capex). As a result, we assume FOCF of EUR20
million-EUR30 million in 2021, getting a boost from working capital
inflow of EUR10 million, reflecting mainly the unusual low levels
of inventory following the decontamination of its slaughterhouse.
We assume FOCF of around EUR10 million in 2022, hampered by working
capital outflow of around EUR10 million when the slaughterhouse
resumes activity and ducks' stocks start to increase. We also
assume capex of about EUR30 million in 2021 and around EUR35
million in 2022, mostly related to project capex to support
capacity extension of existing lines and productivity
improvement."
Labeyrie's business is constrained by the group's potential
difficulty in passing price increases to customers in a timely
fashion, its relatively low geographic diversification, and a mix
skewed toward private labels. The branded ambient food industry is
competitive, and retailers put significant price pressure on food
producers. In response, the group has invested in marketing to
maintain its brands' equity and in innovation to develop new
products in line with consumer trends. S&P said, "However, in our
view, profitability remains subject to hikes in raw material
prices, in particular salmon, although it has a track record of
passing this on to customers. Labeyrie benefits from a portfolio of
strong brands in France and the U.K., with its branded sales making
up close to 40% of the group's total sales in 2020, which support
pricing power in our view. Its historical brand, Labeyrie, is the
leading national brand in foie gras and smoked salmon in French
supermarkets. Also, the company's offerings are premium products
with low purchase frequency, which implies a lower sensitivity to
pricing than for daily staples. Nevertheless, earnings stability
remains constrained by product mix skewed toward private labels and
its geographically concentrated revenue base (with France and the
U.K accounting for about 88% of total sales in 2020)."
S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our anticipation that
Labeyrie's operating performance will improve in the next 12
months, despite some volatility in raw material prices, price
pressure from retailers, and adverse conditions from the avian flu
outbreak. Although we anticipate margins will remain at the lower
end of the 8%-9% range in fiscal 2021, we assume material margin
improvement in the next 12 months driven by cost-control
initiatives, improved industrial performance, and increasing
diversity of products and brands. The group's strong ability to
pass-through cost increases to major retailers will also support
this. We believe that Labeyrie should maintain an FFO cash interest
coverage ratio of 3.5x-4.0x and positive FOCF in the next 12
months. This underpins both the outlook and ratings.
"We would consider lowering our ratings if the company's operating
performance did not improve materially in the next 12 months, for
example if margins decrease due to persisting lower demand from
consumption shifts in core markets or higher operating costs with a
greater likelihood that Labeyrie would not pass on price increases
to retailers on a timely basis. This could also arise from a
setback in sales growth due to strong underperformance in main
product categories, intense competition, and price pressure from
retailers, or due to a bigger impact from the avian flu outbreak
than we expect." This would result in one or more of the
following:
-- The group cannot deleverage continuously toward an adjusted
debt to EBITDA (including PIK debt) of 7.5x by fiscal 2023, after
still-important one-off costs in fiscal 2022.
-- Free cash flow turns negative sustainably.
-- The ratio of FFO to cash interest deteriorates toward 2.0x.
S&P said, "We consider rating upside unlikely, given Labeyrie's
debt leverage tolerance as a private equity owned group. We also
believe that the business remains somewhat constrained in terms of
geographical diversification, and scale of operations, although
this has gradually improved. Moreover, we believe that, despite
being relatively resilient, the group's profitability remains below
that of most peers in the branded food and beverages categories,
which is partly the result of the size of the private label
business. However, we could raise our rating if adjusted debt to
EBITDA fell to 4x-5x sustainably, with a clear commitment from the
financial sponsor to maintain leverage at this level."
=============
I R E L A N D
=============
MONTMARTRE EURO 2020-2: Fitch Rates F-R Notes Final 'B-'
--------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Montmartre Euro CLO 2020-2 DAC 's
refinancing notes final ratings.
DEBT RATING PRIOR
---- ------ -----
Montmartre Euro CLO 2020-2 DAC
A XS2207635017 LT PIFsf Paid In Full AAAsf
A-1-R XS2363072047 LT AAAsf New Rating AAA(EXP)sf
A-2-R XS2363072716 LT AAAsf New Rating AAA(EXP)sf
B-1 XS2207635793 LT PIFsf Paid In Full AAsf
B-2 XS2207636338 LT PIFsf Paid In Full AAsf
B-R XS2363073284 LT AAsf New Rating AA(EXP)sf
C-R XS2363073797 LT Asf New Rating A(EXP)sf
D-R XS2363074175 LT BBB-sf New Rating BBB-(EXP)sf
E-R XS2363074506 LT BB-sf New Rating BB-(EXP)sf
F-R XS2363075651 LT B-sf New Rating B-(EXP)sf
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
Montmartre Euro CLO 2020-2 DAC is a securitisation of mainly senior
secured obligations (at least 90%) with a component of senior
unsecured, mezzanine, second-lien loans and high-yield bonds. Notes
proceeds are used to redeem the existing notes, except the
subordinated notes, which are not being reissued, and pay expenses
in connection with the refinancing, including making a distribution
to subordinated noteholders.
The portfolio is actively managed by CBAM CLO Management Europe
Limited. The collateralised loan obligation (CLO) has a 4.5-year
reinvestment period and an 8.5-year weighted average life (WAL).
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Above-Average Portfolio Credit Quality (Positive): Fitch assesses
the average credit quality of obligor in the 'B' category. The
Fitch weighted average rating factor (WARF) of the identified
portfolio is 32.65.
High Recovery Expectations (Positive): At least 90% of the
portfolio will comprise senior secured obligations. Fitch views the
recovery prospects for these assets as more favourable than for
second-lien, unsecured and mezzanine assets. The Fitch weighted
average recovery rate (WARR) of the target portfolio is 64.59%.
Diversified Asset Portfolio (Positive): The transaction has four
matrices corresponding to two maximum top-10 obligor limits at 15%
and 27.5%; and two maximum fixed-rate asset limits at 0% and 12.5%,
respectively. The transaction also includes various concentration
limits, including a maximum exposure to the three-largest
Fitch-defined industries in the portfolio at 40%. These covenants
ensure the asset portfolio will not be exposed to excessive
concentration.
Portfolio Management (Positive): The transaction has a 4.5-year
reinvestment period and includes reinvestment criteria similar to
those of other European transactions. Fitch's analysis is based on
a stressed-case portfolio with the aim of testing the robustness of
the transaction structure against its covenants and portfolio
guidelines.
Deviation from Model-Implied Rating (Negative): The class D and F
notes' ratings are one notch higher than the model-implied ratings
(MIR). The ratings are supported by the significant default cushion
on the identified portfolio, due to the notable buffer between the
covenants of the transaction and the portfolio's parameters,
including a higher diversity (133 obligors) for the identified
portfolio.
The class F notes' deviation from the MIR reflects Fitch's view
that the tranche has a significant margin of safety given the
credit enhancement level at closing. The notes do not present a
"real possibility of default", which is the definition of 'CCC' in
Fitch's rating definitions.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
This section provides insight into the model-implied sensitivities
the transaction faces when one assumption is modified, while
holding others equal. The modelling process uses the modification
of these variables to reflect asset performance in upside- and
downside environments. The results below should only be considered
as one potential outcome, as the transaction is exposed to multiple
dynamic risk factors. It should not be used as an indicator of
possible future performance.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:
-- A reduction of the default rate (RDR) at all rating levels by
25% of the mean RDR and an increase in the recovery rate (RRR)
by 25% at all rating levels would result in an upgrade of up
to five notches depending on the notes, except for the class A
notes, which are already at the highest rating on Fitch's
scale and cannot be upgraded.
-- At closing, Fitch used a standardised stressed portfolio
(Fitch's stressed portfolio) that is customised to the
portfolio limits as specified in the transaction documents.
Even if the actual portfolio shows lower defaults and smaller
losses (at all rating levels) than the Fitch's stressed
portfolio assumed at closing, an upgrade of the notes during
the reinvestment period is unlikely, given the portfolio
credit quality may still deteriorate, not only by natural
credit migration, but also by reinvestments, and also because
the manager has the possibility to update the Fitch collateral
quality tests.
-- After the end of the reinvestment period, upgrades may occur
on better-than-initially expected portfolio credit quality and
deal performance, leading to higher credit enhancement and
excess spread available to cover for losses in the remaining
portfolio.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:
-- An increase of the RDR at all rating levels by 25% of the mean
RDR and a decrease of the RRR by 25% at all rating levels will
result in downgrades of no more than five notches, depending
on the notes.
-- Downgrades may occur if the build-up of credit enhancement
following amortisation does not compensate for a larger loss
expectation than initially assumed due to unexpectedly high
levels of defaults and portfolio deterioration.
BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO
International scale credit ratings of Structured Finance
transactions have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as
the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of seven notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of seven notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAAsf' to 'Dsf'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings
are based on historical performance.
USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10
Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.
DATA ADEQUACY
Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the
information it has received about the performance of the asset pool
and the transaction. Fitch has not reviewed the results of any
third-party assessment of the asset portfolio information or
conducted a review of origination files as part of its ongoing
monitoring.
The majority of the underlying assets or risk-presenting entities
have ratings or credit opinions from Fitch and/or other nationally
recognised statistical rating organisations and/or European
securities and markets authority-registered rating agencies. Fitch
has relied on the practices of the relevant groups within Fitch
and/or other rating agencies to assess the asset portfolio
information or information on the risk -presenting entities.
Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above,
Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's
rating analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies
indicates that it is adequately reliable.
MONTMARTRE EURO 2020-2: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating to F-R Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its credit ratings to Montmartre Euro
CLO 2020-2 DAC's class A-1-R, A-2-R, B-R, C-R, D-R, E-R, and F-R
notes.
The transaction is a reset of the existing Montmartre Euro CLO
2020-2, which closed in August 2020. The issuance proceeds of the
refinancing notes will be used to redeem the refinanced notes
(class A, B-1, B-2, C, D, E, and F notes of the original Montmartre
Euro CLO 2020-2 DAC CLO transaction), and pay fees and expenses
incurred in connection with the reset.
Under the transaction documents, the rated notes will pay quarterly
interest unless there is a frequency switch event. Following this,
the notes will switch to semiannual payment.
The portfolio's reinvestment period will end approximately 4.5
years after closing.
The ratings assigned to the notes reflect our assessment of:
-- The diversified collateral pool, which consists primarily of
broadly syndicated speculative-grade senior secured term loans and
bonds that are governed by collateral quality tests.
-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization.
-- The collateral manager's experienced team, which can affect the
performance of the rated notes through collateral selection,
ongoing portfolio management, and trading.
Portfolio Benchmarks
CURRENT
S&P Global Ratings weighted-average rating factor 2,774.59
Default rate dispersion 593.84
Weighted-average life (years) 5.35
Obligor diversity measure 110.60
Industry diversity measure 20.60
Regional diversity measure 1.42
Transaction Key Metrics
CURRENT
Total par amount (mil. EUR) 300.00
Defaulted assets (mil. EUR) 0.00
Number of performing obligors 135
Portfolio weighted-average rating
derived from S&P's CDO evaluator 'B'
'CCC' category rated assets (%) 3.8
Covenanted 'AAA' weighted-average recovery (%) 35.94
Covenanted weighted-average spread (%) 3.60
Covenanted weighted-average coupon (%) 3.75
S&P said, "Our ratings reflect our assessment of the collateral
portfolio's credit quality, which has a weighted-average rating of
'B'. We consider that the portfolio is well-diversified on the
effective date, primarily comprising broadly syndicated
speculative-grade senior secured term loans and senior secured
bonds. Therefore, we conducted our credit and cash flow analysis by
applying our criteria for corporate cash flow CDOs.
"In our cash flow analysis, we used the EUR300 million par amount,
the covenanted weighted-average spread of 3.60%, the covenanted
weighted-average coupon of 3.75%, and the covenanted
weighted-average recovery rates for all rating levels designated by
the collateral manager. We applied various cash flow stress
scenarios, using four different default patterns, in conjunction
with different interest rate stress scenarios for each liability
rating category.
"The transaction's documented counterparty replacement and remedy
mechanisms adequately mitigate its exposure to counterparty risk
under our current counterparty criteria.
"Following the application of our structured finance sovereign risk
criteria, we consider the transaction's exposure to country risk to
be limited at the assigned ratings, as the exposure to individual
sovereigns does not exceed the diversification thresholds outlined
in our criteria.
"At closing, we consider that the transaction's legal structure is
bankruptcy remote, in line with our legal criteria.
"In our view the portfolio is granular in nature, and
well-diversified across obligors, industries, and asset
characteristics when compared to other CLO transactions we have
rated recently. As such, we have not applied any additional
scenario and sensitivity analysis when assigning ratings on any
classes of notes in this transaction.
"Until the end of the reinvestment period on Jan. 15, 2026, the
collateral manager is allowed to substitute assets in the portfolio
for so long as our CDO Monitor test is maintained or improved in
relation to the initial ratings on the notes. This test looks at
the total amount of losses that the transaction can sustain as
established by the initial cash flows for each rating, and compares
that with the default potential of the current portfolio plus par
losses to date. As a result, until the end of the reinvestment
period, the collateral manager may, through trading, deteriorate
the transaction's current risk profile, as long as the initial
ratings are maintained.
"Following our analysis of the credit, cash flow, counterparty,
operational, and legal risks, we believe our ratings are
commensurate with the available credit enhancement for the class A
to E notes. Our credit and cash flow analysis indicates that the
available credit enhancement for the class B and C notes could
withstand stresses commensurate with higher ratings than those we
have assigned. However, as the CLO will be in its reinvestment
phase starting from closing, during which the transaction's credit
risk profile could deteriorate, we have capped our ratings assigned
to the notes.
"For the class F notes, our credit and cash flow analysis indicates
that the available credit enhancement could withstand stresses that
are commensurate with a 'CCC' rating. However, we have applied our
'CCC' rating criteria resulting in a 'B- (sf)' rating to this class
of notes."
The one notch of ratings uplift (to 'B-') from the model generated
results (of 'CCC'), reflects several key factors, including:
-- The available credit enhancement for this class of notes is in
the same range as other CLOs that S&P rates, and that have recently
been issued in Europe.
-- The portfolio's average credit quality is similar to other
recent CLOs.
-- S&P said, "Our model generated break even default rate at the
'B-' rating level of 24.81% (for a portfolio with a
weighted-average life of 5.35 years), versus if we were to consider
a long-term sustainable default rate of 3.1% for 5.35 years, which
would result in a target default rate of 16.58%."
-- The actual portfolio is generating higher spreads and coupons
versus the covenanted threshold that S&P has modelled in its cash
flow analysis.
-- S&P said, "For us to assign a rating in the 'CCC' category, we
also assessed, (i) whether the tranche is vulnerable to
non-payments in the near future, (ii) if there is a one in two
chance for this note to default, and (iii) if we envision this
tranche to default in the next 12-18 months.'
-- Following this analysis, S&P considers that the available
credit enhancement for the class F notes is commensurate with the
'B- (sf)' rating assigned.
S&P said, "Taking the above into account and following our analysis
of the credit, cash flow, counterparty, operational, and legal
risks, we believe that our ratings are commensurate with the
available credit enhancement for all of the rated classes of
notes.
"In addition to our standard analysis, to provide an indication of
how rising pressures among speculative-grade corporates could
affect our ratings on European CLO transactions, we have also
included the sensitivity of the ratings on the class A-1 to E notes
to five of the 10 hypothetical scenarios we looked at in our
publication.
"As our ratings analysis makes additional considerations before
assigning ratings in the 'CCC' category, and we would assign a 'B-'
rating if the criteria for assigning a 'CCC' category rating are
not met, we have not included the above scenario analysis results
for the class F notes."
Montmartre Euro CLO 2020-2 DAC is a European cash flow CLO
securitization of a revolving pool, comprising euro-denominated
senior secured loans and bonds issued mainly by speculative-grade
borrowers. CBAM CLO Management Europe LLC manages the transaction.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit factors
S&P said, "We regard the exposure to ESG credit factors in the
transaction as being broadly in line with our benchmark for the
sector. Primarily due to the diversity of the assets within CLOs,
the exposure to environmental credit factors is viewed as below
average, social credit factors are below average, and governance
credit factors are average. For this transaction, the documents
prohibit assets from being related to the following industries:
climate risks excluded obligor, a controversial weapons excluded
obligor, a palm oil excluded obligor, a tobacco excluded obligor.
It also excludes companies where the principal business is
generated from the manufacture, production, distribution of or
trade in pornography, adult entertainment or prostitution related
activities, predatory or payday lending activities, production or
trade of illegal drugs or narcotics, including recreational
marijuana, the development, production, maintenance, trade or
stock-piling of weapons of mass destruction, including
radiological, nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.
Accordingly, since the exclusion of assets from these industries
does not result in material differences between the transaction and
our ESG benchmark for the sector, no specific adjustments have been
made in our rating analysis to account for any ESG-related risks or
opportunities."
Ratings List
CLASS RATING AMOUNT SUB (%) INTEREST RATE*
(MIL. EUR)
A-1-R AAA (sf) 144.00 40.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 0.96%
A-2-R AAA (sf) 36.00 40.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 1.335%§
B-R AA (sf) 36.00 28.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 1.70%
C-R A (sf) 21.00 21.00 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 2.10%
D-R BBB(sf) 19.50 14.50 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 3.10%
E-R BB- (sf) 14.40 9.70 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 6.04%
F-R B- (sf) 8.70 6.80 Three/six-month EURIBOR
plus 8.83%
Sub. Notes NR 24.735 N/A N/A
*The payment frequency switches to semiannual and the index
switches to six-month EURIBOR when a frequency switch event occurs.
§The class A2 notes have a cap on EURIBOR at 2.1% in addition to
a floor on EURIBOR at 0%.
EURIBOR--Euro Interbank Offered Rate.
NR--Not rated.
N/A--Not applicable.
OAK HILL III: Moody's Affirms B3 Rating on EUR12MM Class F-R Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the ratings on the following
notes issued by Oak Hill European Credit Partners III Designated
Activity Company:
EUR25,500,000 Class B-1R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2030, Upgraded to Aa1 (sf); previously on Jun 18, 2020 Affirmed Aa2
(sf)
EUR15,800,000 Class B-2R Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes due 2030,
Upgraded to Aa1 (sf); previously on Jun 18, 2020 Affirmed Aa2 (sf)
EUR8,700,000 Class B-3R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2030, Upgraded to Aa1 (sf); previously on Jun 18, 2020 Affirmed Aa2
(sf)
EUR22,500,000 Class C-R Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2030, Upgraded to A1 (sf); previously on Jun 18, 2020
Affirmed A2 (sf)
EUR20,000,000 Class D-R Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2030, Upgraded to Baa1 (sf); previously on Jun 18, 2020
Confirmed at Baa2 (sf)
Moody's has also affirmed the ratings on the following notes:
EUR222,200,000 Class A-1R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2030, Affirmed Aaa (sf); previously on Jun 18, 2020 Affirmed Aaa
(sf)
EUR15,800,000 Class A-2R Senior Secured Fixed/Floating Rate Notes
due 2030, Affirmed Aaa (sf); previously on Jun 18, 2020 Affirmed
Aaa (sf)
EUR28,000,000 Class E-R Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2030, Affirmed Ba2 (sf); previously on Jun 18, 2020
Confirmed at Ba2 (sf)
EUR12,000,000 Class F-R Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2030, Affirmed B3 (sf); previously on Jun 18, 2020
Downgraded to B3 (sf)
Oak Hill European Credit Partners III Designated Activity Company,
issued in June 2015 and reset in July 2017, is a collateralised
loan obligation (CLO) backed by a portfolio of mostly high-yield
senior secured European loans. The portfolio is managed by Oak Hill
Advisors (Europe), LLP. The transaction's reinvestment period will
end in July 2021.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The rating upgrades on the Class B-1R, B-2R, B-3R, C-R and D-R
notes are primarily a result of the benefit of the shorter period
of time remaining before the end of the reinvestment period in July
2021.
The affirmations on the ratings on the Class A-1R, A-2R, E-R and
F-R notes are primarily a result of the expected losses on the
notes remaining consistent with their current ratings after taking
into account the CLO's latest portfolio, its relevant structural
features and its actual over-collateralization (OC) levels.
In light of reinvestment restrictions during the amortisation
period, and therefore the limited ability to effect significant
changes to the current collateral pool, Moody's analysed the deal
assuming a higher likelihood that the collateral pool
characteristics would maintain an adequate buffer relative to
certain covenant requirements.
Key model inputs:
The key model inputs Moody's uses in its analysis, such as par,
weighted average rating factor, diversity score and the weighted
average recovery rate, are based on its published methodology and
could differ from the trustee's reported numbers.
In its base case, Moody's used the following assumptions:
Performing par and principal proceeds balance: EUR392,192,559
Defaulted Securities: EUR2,957,312
Diversity Score: 48
Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2996
Weighted Average Life (WAL): 4.66 years
Weighted Average Spread (WAS) (before accounting for Euribor
floors): 3.58%
Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 5.07%
Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 45.23%
Par haircut in OC tests and interest diversion test: 0.016%
The default probability derives from the credit quality of the
collateral pool and Moody's expectation of the remaining life of
the collateral pool. The estimated average recovery rate on future
defaults is based primarily on the seniority of the assets in the
collateral pool. In each case, historical and market performance
and a collateral manager's latitude to trade collateral are also
relevant factors. Moody's incorporates these default and recovery
characteristics of the collateral pool into its cash flow model
analysis, subjecting them to stresses as a function of the target
rating of each CLO liability it is analysing.
Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:
The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2020.
Counterparty Exposure:
The rating action took into consideration the notes' exposure to
relevant counterparties, such as account bank, using the
methodology "Moody's Approach to Assessing Counterparty Risks in
Structured Finance" published in May 2021. Moody's concluded the
ratings of the notes are not constrained by these risks.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:
This transaction is subject to a high level of macroeconomic
uncertainty, which could negatively affect the ratings on the note,
in light of uncertainty about credit conditions in the general
economy. In particular, the length and severity of the economic and
credit shock precipitated by the global coronavirus pandemic will
have a significant impact on the performance of the securities. CLO
notes' performance may also be impacted either positively or
negatively by 1) the manager's investment strategy and behaviour
and 2) divergence in the legal interpretation of CDO documentation
by different transactional parties because of embedded
ambiguities.
Additional uncertainty about performance is due to the following:
Weighted average life: The notes' ratings are sensitive to the
weighted average life assumption of the portfolio, which could
lengthen as a result of the manager's decision to reinvest in new
issue loans or other loans with longer maturities, or participate
in amend-to-extend offerings. Moody's tested for a possible
extension of the actual weighted average life in its analysis. The
effect on the ratings of extending the portfolio's weighted average
life can be positive or negative depending on the notes'
seniority.
Recovery of defaulted assets: Market value fluctuations in
trustee-reported defaulted assets and those Moody's assumes have
defaulted can result in volatility in the deal's
over-collateralisation levels. Further, the timing of recoveries
and the manager's decision whether to work out or sell defaulted
assets can also result in additional uncertainty. Moody's analysed
defaulted recoveries assuming the lower of the market price or the
recovery rate to account for potential volatility in market prices.
Recoveries higher than Moody's expectations would have a positive
impact on the notes' ratings.
PERIOD DOOR: In Liquidation After Rescue Efforts Collapse
---------------------------------------------------------
The Irish Times reports that Period Door Properties Ltd, a company
that rents luxury properties -- including one owned by singer Bob
Geldof -- on behalf of landlords, is to be wound up by order of the
High Court.
According to The Irish Times, the court was told on July 15 that
efforts to save the company collapsed due to the withdrawal last
week by Ulster Bank of overdraft and credit facilities and the
"unwarranted" withdrawal by Daft.ie of advertising services.
The court was also told that coupled with the behaviour of certain
subtenants, to whom the group rented rooms but who allegedly
refused to pay their rent and utility bills, the company was
hopelessly insolvent and sought liquidation so that other tenants
who were paying their bills could be treated fairly, The Irish
Times relates.
Ken Fogarty SC, for the company, told the court that, as a result
of the developments at Ulster Bank and Daft, there had been a
significant alteration in the company's financial standing, The
Irish Times recounts. As a result, it had been decided to seek a
withdrawal of the examinership petition and its replacement with an
application to appoint a liquidator, The Irish Times notes.
The examiner, Andrew Feighery, principal of GCG Associates, said
the company was "hopelessly insolvent" and winding up was more
appropriate, acccording to The Irish Times. He said if appointed
liquidator, he intended to pursue the numerous outstanding sums due
to the company to maximize collections for creditors and endeavour
to ensure remaining tenants are treated fairly, The Irish Times
relays.
Period Door Properties' business was to rent whole houses in
upmarket areas of Dublin from landlords and then sublet individual
rooms in those properties. It handles 20 properties in places such
as Ballsbridge, Clontarf, Monkstown, Rathgar and Donnybrook
including one in Crosthwaite Park South, Dún Laoghaire, whose
landlord is Bob Geldof.
SORRENTO PARK: Moody's Upgrades EUR17.5MM Class E Notes to Ba3
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the ratings on the following
notes issued by Sorrento Park CLO Designated Activity Company:
EUR28,750,000 Class C-R Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2027, Upgraded to Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 18, 2020
Upgraded to A1 (sf)
EUR30,000,000 Class D Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2027, Upgraded to Baa1 (sf); previously on Dec 18, 2020
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf)
EUR17,500,000 Class E Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2027, Upgraded to Ba3 (sf); previously on Dec 18, 2020
Upgraded to B1 (sf)
Moody's has also affirmed the ratings on the following notes:
EUR290,000,000 (Current Outstanding Balance EUR25,701,973.73)
Class A-1A-R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2027, Affirmed
Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 18, 2020 Affirmed Aaa (sf)
EUR5,000,000 (Current Outstanding Balance EUR443,137.48) Class
A-1B-R Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes due 2027, Affirmed Aaa (sf);
previously on Dec 18, 2020 Affirmed Aaa (sf)
EUR28,750,000 Class A-2A-R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2027, Affirmed Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 18, 2020 Affirmed Aaa
(sf)
EUR30,000,000 Class A-2B-R Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes due
2027, Affirmed Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 18, 2020 Affirmed Aaa
(sf)
EUR30,000,000 Class B-R Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2027, Affirmed Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 18, 2020
Upgraded to Aaa (sf)
Sorrento Park CLO Designated Activity Company, issued in October
2014 and refinanced in May 2017, is a collateralised loan
obligation (CLO) backed by a portfolio of mostly high-yield senior
secured European loans. The portfolio is managed by Blackstone
Ireland Limited. The transaction's reinvestment period ended in
November 2018.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The rating upgrades on the Class C-R, D and E notes are primarily a
result of the significant deleveraging of the Class A-1A-R and
A-1B-R notes following amortisation of the underlying portfolio
since the last rating action in December 2020. Pre-payments and
sales account for a significant proportion of the amortisation.
The Class A-1A-R and A-1B-R notes have paid down by approximately
EUR60.9 million (21.0%) since the last rating action in December
2020 and EUR268.9 million (91.1%) since closing. As a result of the
deleveraging, over-collateralisation (OC) has increased across the
capital structure. According to the trustee report dated June 2021
[1] the Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D OC ratios are reported
at 251.0%, 185.4%, 148.3% and 122.7%, compared to December 2020 [2]
levels of 187.1%, 155.4%, 133.7% and 116.6% respectively.
The rating affirmations on the Class A-1A-R, A-1B-R, A-2A-R, A-2B-R
and B-R Notes reflect the expected losses of the notes continuing
to remain consistent with their current ratings after taking into
account the CLO's latest portfolio, its relevant structural
features and its actual over-collateralization levels, as well as
applying Moody's revised CLO assumptions.
The key model inputs Moody's uses in its analysis, such as par,
weighted average rating factor, diversity score and the weighted
average recovery rate, are based on its published methodology and
could differ from the trustee's reported numbers.
In its base case, Moody's used the following assumptions:
Performing par and principal proceeds balance: EUR214.9m
Defaulted Securities: None
Diversity Score: 34
Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 3122
Weighted Average Life (WAL): 3.38 years
Weighted Average Spread (WAS) (before accounting for Euribor
floors): 3.52%
Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 4.32%
Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 46.1%
Par haircut in OC tests: 0.92%
The default probability derives from the credit quality of the
collateral pool and Moody's expectation of the remaining life of
the collateral pool. The estimated average recovery rate on future
defaults is based primarily on the seniority of the assets in the
collateral pool. In each case, historical and market performance
and a collateral manager's latitude to trade collateral are also
relevant factors. Moody's incorporates these default and recovery
characteristics of the collateral pool into its cash flow model
analysis, subjecting them to stresses as a function of the target
rating of each CLO liability it is analysing.
Moody's notes that the June 2021 trustee report was published at
the time it was completing its analysis of the May 2021 data. Key
portfolio metrics such as WARF, diversity score, weighted average
spread and life exhibit little or no change between these dates.
Moody's analysis incorporates the performing par, principal
proceeds, and outstanding notes' balances as per the June 2021
data.
Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:
The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2020.
Counterparty Exposure:
The rating action took into consideration the notes' exposure to
relevant counterparties, such as account bank and swap providers,
using the methodology "Moody's Approach to Assessing Counterparty
Risks in Structured Finance" published in May 2021. Moody's
concluded the ratings of the notes are not constrained by these
risks.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:
This transaction is subject to a high level of macroeconomic
uncertainty, which could negatively affect the ratings on the
notes, in light of uncertainty about credit conditions in the
general economy. In particular, the length and severity of the
economic and credit shock precipitated by the global coronavirus
pandemic will have a significant impact on the performance of the
securities. CLO notes' performance may also be impacted either
positively or negatively by: (1) the manager's investment strategy
and behavior; (2) divergence in the legal interpretation of CDO
documentation by different transactional parties because of
embedded ambiguities; and (3) the additional expected loss
associated with hedging agreements in this transaction which may
also impact the ratings negatively.
Additional uncertainty about performance is due to the following:
Portfolio amortisation: The main source of uncertainty in this
transaction is the pace of amortisation of the underlying
portfolio, which can vary significantly depending on market
conditions and have a significant impact on the notes' ratings.
Amortisation could accelerate as a consequence of high loan
prepayment levels or collateral sales by the collateral manager or
be delayed by an increase in loan amend-and-extend restructurings.
Fast amortisation would usually benefit the ratings of the notes
beginning with the notes having the highest prepayment priority.
TORO EUROPEAN 3: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating to Class F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned credit ratings to Toro European CLO 3
DAC's class X, A, B-1, B-2, C, D, E, and F notes. The issuer has
also issued additional subordinated notes to bring the total
issuance to EUR46 million.
The ratings reflect S&P's assessment of:
-- The diversified collateral pool, which consists primarily of
broadly syndicated speculative-grade senior-secured term loans and
bonds that are governed by collateral quality tests.
-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization.
-- The collateral manager's experienced team, which can affect
the performance of the rated notes through collateral selection,
ongoing portfolio management, and trading.
-- The transaction's legal structure, which S&P considers
bankruptcy remote.
-- The transaction's counterparty risks, which is in line with
S&P's counterparty rating framework.
Portfolio Benchmarks
CURRENT
S&P weighted-average rating factor 2,787.44
Default rate dispersion 707.64
Weighted-average life (years) 3.94
Obligor diversity measure 100.69
Industry diversity measure 19.36
Regional diversity measure 1.28
Transaction Key Metrics
CURRENT
Portfolio weighted-average rating
derived from S&P's CDO evaluator B
'CCC' category rated assets (%) 3.60
Covenanted 'AAA' weighted-average recovery (%) 36.51
Covenanted weighted-average spread (%) 3.70
Covenanted weighted-average coupon (%) 3.40
Workout obligations
Under the transaction documents, the issuer can purchase workout
obligations, which are assets of an existing collateral obligation
held by the issuer offered in connection with bankruptcy, workout,
or restructuring of such obligation, to improve the recovery value
of such related collateral obligation.
Workout obligations allow the issuer to participate in potential
new financing initiatives by the borrower in default. This feature
aims to mitigate the risk of other market participants taking
advantage of CLO restrictions, which typically do not allow the CLO
to participate in a defaulted entity's new financing request.
Hence, this feature increases the chance of a higher recovery for
the CLO. While the objective is positive, it can also lead to par
erosion, as additional funds will be placed with an entity that is
under distress or in default. This may cause greater volatility in
our ratings if the positive effect of such obligations does not
materialize. In S&P's view, the presence of a bucket for workout
obligations, the restrictions on the use of interest and principal
proceeds to purchase such assets, and the limitations in
reclassifying proceeds received from such assets from principal to
interest help to mitigate the risk.
The purchase of workout obligations is not subject to the
reinvestment criteria or the eligibility criteria. The issuer may
purchase workout obligations using interest proceeds, principal
proceeds, or amounts in the collateral enhancement account. The use
of interest proceeds to purchase workout obligations is subject
to:
-- The manager determining that after such purchase there are
sufficient interest proceeds to pay interest on all the rated notes
on the upcoming payment date.
-- The coverage tests passing after such purchase.
The use of principal proceeds is subject to:
-- The obligation having a principal balance at least equal to its
purchase price.
-- Passing par value tests and reinvestment test.
-- The manager having built sufficient excess par in the
transaction so that the aggregate collateral balance is equal to or
exceeds the portfolio's reinvestment target par balance after the
reinvestment.
-- The balance in the principal account is a positive amount after
such purchase.
Workout obligations purchased with principal proceeds, which have
limited deviation from the eligibility criteria will receive
collateral value credit for overcollateralization carrying value
purposes. Workout obligations purchased with interest or collateral
enhancement proceeds will receive zero credit. Any distributions
received from workout obligations purchased with the use of
principal proceeds will form part of the issuer's principal account
proceeds and cannot be recharacterized as interest. Any other
amounts can form part of the issuer's interest account proceeds.
The manager may, at their sole discretion, elect to classify
amounts received from any workout obligations as principal
proceeds.
The cumulative exposure to workout obligations purchased with
principal is limited to 5% of the target par amount. The cumulative
exposure to workout obligations purchased with principal and
interest is limited to 10% of the target par amount.
Rating rationale
Under the transaction documents, the rated notes will pay quarterly
interest unless a frequency switch event occurs. Following this,
the notes will switch to semiannual payments. The portfolio's
reinvestment period will end approximately 4.5 years after
closing.
S&P said, "We consider the portfolio to be well-diversified,
primarily comprising broadly syndicated speculative-grade
senior-secured term loans and senior-secured bonds. Therefore, we
have conducted our credit and cash flow analysis by applying our
criteria for corporate cash flow CDOs.
"In our cash flow analysis, we used the EUR350 million target par
amount, the covenanted weighted-average spread (3.70%), the
reference weighted-average coupon (3.40%), and the actual
weighted-average recovery rates of the portfolio. We applied
various cash flow stress scenarios, using four different default
patterns, in conjunction with different interest rate stress
scenarios for each liability rating category.
"Under our structured finance sovereign risk criteria, we consider
that the transaction's exposure to country risk is sufficiently
mitigated at the assigned ratings.
"Until the end of the reinvestment period on Jan. 15, 2026, the
collateral manager may substitute assets in the portfolio for so
long as our CDO Monitor test is maintained or improved in relation
to the initial ratings on the notes. This test looks at the total
amount of losses that the transaction can sustain as established by
the initial cash flows for each rating, and it compares that with
the current portfolio's default potential plus par losses to date.
As a result, until the end of the reinvestment period, the
collateral manager may through trading deteriorate the
transaction's current risk profile, as long as the initial ratings
are maintained.
"We consider the transaction's documented counterparty replacement
and remedy mechanisms to adequately mitigate its exposure to
counterparty risk under our current counterparty criteria.
"We consider the transaction's legal structure and framework to be
bankruptcy remote, in line with our legal criteria.
"Following our analysis of the credit, cash flow, counterparty,
operational, and legal risks, we believe our ratings are
commensurate with the available credit enhancement for the class X
to E notes. Our credit and cash flow analysis indicates that the
available credit enhancement for the class B-1, B-2, C and D notes
could withstand stresses commensurate with higher rating levels
than those we have assigned. However, as the CLO will be in its
reinvestment phase starting from closing, during which the
transaction's credit risk profile could deteriorate, we have capped
our ratings assigned to the notes.
"For the class F notes, our credit and cash flow analysis indicates
that the available credit enhancement could withstand stresses that
are commensurate with a lower rating. However, after applying our
'CCC' criteria we have assigned a 'B-' rating to this class of
notes.' The uplift to 'B-' reflects several key factors,
including:
-- The available credit enhancement for this class of notes is in
the same range as other CLOs that we rate, and that have recently
been issued in Europe.
-- The portfolio's average credit quality is similar to other
recent CLOs.
S&P said, "Our model generated breakeven default rate (BDR) at the
'B-' rating level of 24.34% (for a portfolio with a
weighted-average life of 4.50 years), versus if we were to consider
a long-term sustainable default rate of 3.1% for 4.50 years, which
would result in a target default rate of 13.95%.
"In addition to our standard analysis, to provide an indication of
how rising pressures among speculative-grade corporates could
affect our ratings on European CLO transactions, we have also
included the sensitivity of the ratings on the class X to E notes
to five of the 10 hypothetical scenarios we looked at in our
publication "How Credit Distress Due To COVID-19 Could Affect
European CLO Ratings," published on April 2, 2020.
"As our ratings analysis makes additional considerations before
assigning ratings in the 'CCC' category, and we would assign a 'B-'
rating if the criteria for assigning a 'CCC' category rating are
not met, we have not included the above scenario analysis results
for the class F notes."
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit factors
S&P said, "We regard the exposure to ESG credit factors in the
transaction as being broadly in line with our benchmark for the
sector. Primarily due to the diversity of the assets within CLOs,
the exposure to environmental credit factors is viewed as below
average, social credit factors are below average, and governance
credit factors are average. For this transaction, the documents
prohibit assets from being related to the following industries if
certain conditions are met (non-exhaustive list): thermal coal
production, production of or trade in controversial weapons,
manufacturing of tobacco, involvement in pornography, prostitution
or human trafficking, forced child labor, and severe environmental
damage. Accordingly, since the exclusion of assets from these
industries does not result in material differences between the
transaction and our ESG benchmark for the sector, no specific
adjustments have been made in our rating analysis to account for
any ESG-related risks or opportunities."
The transaction securitizes a portfolio of primarily senior-secured
leveraged loans and bonds, and it is managed by Chenavari Credit
Partners LLP.
Ratings List
CLASS RATING AMOUNT INTEREST RATE (%) CREDIT
(MIL. EUR) ENHANCEMENT (%)
X AAA (sf) 1.50 3mE + 0.60 N/A
A AAA (sf) 213.50 3mE + 0.99 39.00
B-1 AA (sf) 28.00 3mE + 1.75 28.14
B-2 AA (sf) 10.00 2.10 28.14
C A (sf) 23.50 3mE + 2.45 21.43
D BBB- (sf) 22.50 3mE + 3.45 15.00
E BB- (sf) 19.00 3mE + 6.30 9.57
F B- (sf) 9.00 3mE + 8.99 7.00
Subordinated NR 46.00 N/A N/A
NR--Not rated.
N/A--Not applicable.
3mE--Three-month Euro Interbank Offered Rate.
TORO EUROPEAN 3: S&P Assigns Prelim. B- Rating on Cl. F Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned preliminary credit ratings to Toro
European CLO 3 DAC's class X, A, B-1, B-2, C, D, E, and F notes. At
closing, the issuer will also issue additional subordinated notes
to bring the total issuance to EUR46 million.
The preliminary ratings reflect S&P's assessment of:
-- The diversified collateral pool, which consists primarily of
broadly syndicated speculative-grade senior-secured term loans and
bonds that are governed by collateral quality tests.
-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization.
-- The collateral manager's experienced team, which can affect the
performance of the rated notes through collateral selection,
ongoing portfolio management, and trading.
-- The transaction's legal structure, which S&P expects to be
bankruptcy remote.
-- The transaction's counterparty risks, which S&P expects to be
in line with its counterparty rating framework.
Portfolio Benchmarks
CURRENT
S&P weighted-average rating factor 2,792.59
Default rate dispersion 710.85
Weighted-average life (years) 3.94
Obligor diversity measure 100.69
Industry diversity measure 19.11
Regional diversity measure 1.28
Transaction Key Metrics
CURRENT
Portfolio weighted-average rating
derived from S&P's CDO evaluator B
'CCC' category rated assets (%) 4.65%
Covenanted 'AAA' weighted-average recovery (%) 36.51
Covenanted weighted-average spread (%) 3.70
Covenanted weighted-average coupon (%) 3.40
Workout obligations
Under the transaction documents, the issuer can purchase workout
obligations, which are assets of an existing collateral obligation
held by the issuer offered in connection with bankruptcy, workout,
or restructuring of such obligation, to improve the recovery value
of such related collateral obligation.
Workout obligations allow the issuer to participate in potential
new financing initiatives by the borrower in default. This feature
aims to mitigate the risk of other market participants taking
advantage of CLO restrictions, which typically do not allow the CLO
to participate in a defaulted entity's new financing request.
Hence, this feature increases the chance of a higher recovery for
the CLO. While the objective is positive, it can also lead to par
erosion, as additional funds will be placed with an entity that is
under distress or in default. This may cause greater volatility in
our ratings if the positive effect of such obligations does not
materialize. In S&P's view, the presence of a bucket for workout
obligations, the restrictions on the use of interest and principal
proceeds to purchase such assets, and the limitations in
reclassifying proceeds received from such assets from principal to
interest help to mitigate the risk.
The purchase of workout obligations is not subject to the
reinvestment criteria or the eligibility criteria. The issuer may
purchase workout obligations using interest proceeds, principal
proceeds, or amounts in the collateral enhancement account. The use
of interest proceeds to purchase workout obligations is subject
to:
The manager determining that after such purchase there are
sufficient interest proceeds to pay interest on all the rated notes
on the upcoming payment date.
The coverage tests passing after such purchase.
The use of principal proceeds is subject to:
-- The obligation having a principal balance at least equal to its
purchase price.
-- Passing par value tests and reinvestment test.
-- The manager having built sufficient excess par in the
transaction so that the aggregate collateral balance is equal to or
exceeds the portfolio's reinvestment target par balance after the
reinvestment.
-- The balance in the principal account is a positive amount after
such purchase.
Workout obligations purchased with principal proceeds, which have
limited deviation from the eligibility criteria will receive
collateral value credit for overcollateralization carrying value
purposes. Workout obligations purchased with interest or collateral
enhancement proceeds will receive zero credit. Any distributions
received from workout obligations purchased with the use of
principal proceeds will form part of the issuer's principal account
proceeds and cannot be recharacterized as interest. Any other
amounts can form part of the issuer's interest account proceeds.
The manager may, at their sole discretion, elect to classify
amounts received from any workout obligations as principal
proceeds.
The cumulative exposure to workout obligations purchased with
principal is limited to 5% of the target par amount. The cumulative
exposure to workout obligations purchased with principal and
interest is limited to 10% of the target par amount.
Rating rationale
Under the transaction documents, the rated notes will pay quarterly
interest unless a frequency switch event occurs. Following this,
the notes will switch to semiannual payments. The portfolio's
reinvestment period will end approximately 4.5 years after
closing.
S&P said, "We understand that at closing the portfolio will be
well-diversified, primarily comprising broadly syndicated
speculative-grade senior-secured term loans and senior-secured
bonds. Therefore, we have conducted our credit and cash flow
analysis by applying our criteria for corporate cash flow CDOs.
"In our cash flow analysis, we used the EUR350 million target par
amount, the covenanted weighted-average spread (3.70%), the
reference weighted-average coupon (3.40%), and the actual
weighted-average recovery rates of the portfolio. We applied
various cash flow stress scenarios, using four different default
patterns, in conjunction with different interest rate stress
scenarios for each liability rating category.
"Under our structured finance sovereign risk criteria, we consider
that the transaction's exposure to country risk is sufficiently
mitigated at the assigned preliminary ratings.
"Until the end of the reinvestment period on Jan. 15, 2026, the
collateral manager may substitute assets in the portfolio for so
long as our CDO Monitor test is maintained or improved in relation
to the initial ratings on the notes. This test looks at the total
amount of losses that the transaction can sustain as established by
the initial cash flows for each rating, and it compares that with
the current portfolio's default potential plus par losses to date.
As a result, until the end of the reinvestment period, the
collateral manager may through trading deteriorate the
transaction's current risk profile, as long as the initial ratings
are maintained.
"At closing, we expect that the transaction's documented
counterparty replacement and remedy mechanisms will adequately
mitigate its exposure to counterparty risk under our current
counterparty criteria.
"We expect the transaction's legal structure and framework to be
bankruptcy remote, in line with our legal criteria.
"Following our analysis of the credit, cash flow, counterparty,
operational, and legal risks, we believe our preliminary ratings
are commensurate with the available credit enhancement for the
class X to E notes. Our credit and cash flow analysis indicates
that the available credit enhancement for the class B-1, B-2, C and
D notes could withstand stresses commensurate with higher rating
levels than those we have assigned. However, as the CLO will be in
its reinvestment phase starting from closing, during which the
transaction's credit risk profile could deteriorate, we have capped
our preliminary ratings assigned to the notes.
"For the class F notes, our credit and cash flow analysis indicates
that the available credit enhancement could withstand stresses that
are commensurate with a lower rating. However, after applying our
'CCC' criteria we have assigned a 'B-' rating to this class of
notes." The uplift to 'B-' reflects several key factors,
including:
-- The available credit enhancement for this class of notes is in
the same range as other CLOs that S&P rates, and that have recently
been issued in Europe.
-- The portfolio's average credit quality is similar to other
recent CLOs.
S&P said, "Our model generated breakeven default rate (BDR) at the
'B-' rating level of 24.34% (for a portfolio with a
weighted-average life of 4.50 years), versus if we were to consider
a long-term sustainable default rate of 3.1% for 4.50 years, which
would result in a target default rate of 13.95%.
"In addition to our standard analysis, to provide an indication of
how rising pressures among speculative-grade corporates could
affect our ratings on European CLO transactions, we have also
included the sensitivity of the ratings on the class X to E notes
to five of the 10 hypothetical scenarios we looked at in our
publication "How Credit Distress Due To COVID-19 Could Affect
European CLO Ratings," published on April 2, 2020.
"As our ratings analysis makes additional considerations before
assigning ratings in the 'CCC' category, and we would assign a 'B-'
rating if the criteria for assigning a 'CCC' category rating are
not met, we have not included the above scenario analysis results
for the class F notes."
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit factors
S&P said, "We regard the exposure to ESG credit factors in the
transaction as being broadly in line with our benchmark for the
sector. Primarily due to the diversity of the assets within CLOs,
the exposure to environmental credit factors is viewed as below
average, social credit factors are below average, and governance
credit factors are average. For this transaction, the documents
prohibit assets from being related to the following industries if
certain conditions are met (non-exhaustive list): thermal coal
production, production of or trade in controversial weapons,
manufacturing of tobacco, involvement in pornography, prostitution
or human trafficking, forced child labor, and severe environmental
damage. Accordingly, since the exclusion of assets from these
industries does not result in material differences between the
transaction and our ESG benchmark for the sector, no specific
adjustments have been made in our rating analysis to account for
any ESG-related risks or opportunities."
The transaction securitizes a portfolio of primarily senior-secured
leveraged loans and bonds, and it will be managed by Chenavari
Credit Partners LLP.
Ratings List
CLASS PRELIM PRELIM AMOUNT INTEREST RATE CREDIT
RATING (MIL. EUR) (%) ENHANCEMENT(%)
X AAA (sf) 1.50 3mE + 0.60 N/A
A AAA (sf) 213.50 3mE + 0.99 39.00
B-1 AA (sf) 28.00 3mE + 1.75 28.14
B-2 AA (sf) 10.00 2.10 28.14
C A (sf) 23.50 3mE + 2.45 21.43
D BBB- (sf) 22.50 3mE + 3.45 15.00
E BB- (sf) 19.00 3mE + 6.30 9.57
F B- (sf) 9.00 3mE + 8.99 7.00
Subordinated NR 46.00 N/A N/A
NR--Not rated.
N/A--Not applicable.
3mE--Three-month Euro Interbank Offered Rate.
VOYA EURO II: Fitch Assigns Final B- Rating to F-R Tranche
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Voya Euro CLO II DAC reset final
ratings.
DEBT RATING PRIOR
---- ------ -----
Voya Euro CLO II DAC
A XS1989821720 LT PIFsf Paid In Full AAAsf
A-R XS2357476691 LT AAAsf New Rating AAA(EXP)sf
B-1 XS1989822538 LT PIFsf Paid In Full AAsf
B-1-R XS2357476931 LT AAsf New Rating AA(EXP)sf
B-2 XS1989823189 LT PIFsf Paid In Full AAsf
B-2-R XS2357477152 LT AAsf New Rating AA(EXP)sf
C XS1989823858 LT PIFsf Paid In Full Asf
C-R XS2357477079 LT Asf New Rating A(EXP)sf
D XS1989824401 LT PIFsf Paid In Full BBB-sf
D-R XS2357477236 LT BBB-sf New Rating BBB-(EXP)sf
E XS1989824823 LT PIFsf Paid In Full BB-sf
E-R XS2357478556 LT BB-sf New Rating BB-(EXP)sf
F XS1989825127 LT PIFsf Paid In Full B-sf
F-R XS2357478473 LT B-sf New Rating B-(EXP)sf
X XS1989821563 LT PIFsf Paid In Full AAAsf
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
Voya Euro CLO II DAC Reset is a securitisation of mainly senior
secured obligations (at least 90%) with a component of senior
unsecured, mezzanine, second-lien loans, first-lien, last-out loans
and high-yield bonds. Net proceeds from the issuance of the notes
have been used to redeem existing notes (excluding the subordinated
notes) at the reset date. The portfolio is actively managed by Voya
Alternative Asset Management LLC. The transaction has a 4.5-year
reinvestment period and an 8.5-year weighted average life (WAL).
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Average Portfolio Credit Quality (Neutral): Fitch Ratings assesses
the average credit quality of obligors in the 'B'/'B-' category.
The Fitch weighted average rating factor (WARF) of the identified
portfolio is 33.77.
High Recovery Expectations (Positive): At least 90% of the
portfolio will comprise senior secured obligations. Fitch views the
recovery prospects for these assets as more favourable than for
second-lien, unsecured and mezzanine assets. The Fitch weighted
average recovery rate (WARR) of the identified portfolio is
64.53%.
Diversified Portfolio (Positive): The transaction includes four
Fitch test matrices corresponding to the top-10 obligor limits of
15% and 20% and maximum fixed-rated assets at 0% and 5% of the
portfolio balance. The transaction also includes various
concentration limits, including a maximum exposure to the
three-largest Fitch-defined industries in the portfolio at 40%.
These covenants ensure that the asset portfolio will not be exposed
to excessive concentration.
Portfolio Management (Neutral): The transaction has a 4.5-year
reinvestment period and includes reinvestment criteria similar to
those of other European transactions. Fitch's analysis is based on
a stressed portfolio with the aim of testing the robustness of the
transaction structure against its covenants and portfolio
guidelines.
Deviation from Model-Implied Rating (Negative): The final ratings
of the class D and F notes are one notch higher than the
model-implied ratings (MIR). When analysing the Fitch test matrices
with the stressed portfolio, the notes showed maximum break-even
default-rate shortfalls of 0.38% and 2.43% respectively. The final
ratings are supported by average credit enhancement, as well as a
significant default cushion in the identified portfolio due to a
notable buffer between the covenants of the transaction and the
portfolio's parameters.
Moreover, for the class F notes the deviation from the MIR reflects
Fitch's view that the tranche has a significant margin of safety
given its credit enhancement. The notes do not currently present a
"real possibility of default", which is the definition of 'CCC' in
Fitch's Rating Definitions.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:
-- A reduction of the default rate (RDR) at all rating levels by
25% of the mean RDR and an increase in the recovery rate (RRR)
by 25% at all rating levels would result in an upgrade of up
to five notches depending on the notes, except for the class
A-R notes, which are already at the highest rating on Fitch's
scale and cannot be upgraded.
-- At closing, Fitch used a standardised stressed portfolio
(Fitch's stressed portfolio) that is customised to the
portfolio limits as specified in the transaction documents.
Even if the actual portfolio shows lower defaults and smaller
losses at all rating levels than Fitch's stressed portfolio
assumed at closing, an upgrade of the notes during the
reinvestment period is unlikely, as the portfolio's credit
quality may still deteriorate, not only by natural credit
migration, but also through reinvestments, and also because
the manager has the possibility to update the Fitch collateral
quality tests.
-- After the end of the reinvestment period, upgrades may occur
if on better-than-expected portfolio credit quality and deal
performance, leading to higher credit enhancement and excess
spread available to cover for losses in the remaining
portfolio.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:
-- An increase of the RDR at all rating levels by 25% of the mean
RDR and a decrease of the RRR by 25% at all rating levels will
result in downgrades of no more than five notches, depending
on the notes.
-- Downgrades may occur if the build-up of the notes' credit
enhancement following amortisation does not compensate for a
larger loss expectation than initially assumed due to
unexpectedly high levels of default and portfolio
deterioration.
BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO
International scale credit ratings of Structured Finance
transactions have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as
the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of seven notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of seven notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAAsf' to 'Dsf'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings
are based on historical performance.
USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10
Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.
DATA ADEQUACY
Fitch has checked the consistency and plausibility of the
information it has received about the performance of the asset pool
and the transaction. Fitch has not reviewed the results of any
third-party assessment of the asset portfolio information or
conducted a review of origination files as part of its ongoing
monitoring.
The majority of the underlying assets or risk-presenting entities
have ratings or credit opinions from Fitch and/or other nationally
recognised statistical rating organisations and/or European
securities and markets authority-registered rating agencies. Fitch
has relied on the practices of the relevant groups within Fitch
and/or other rating agencies to assess the asset portfolio
information or information on the risk-presenting entities.
Overall, and together with any assumptions referred to above,
Fitch's assessment of the information relied upon for the agency's
rating analysis according to its applicable rating methodologies
indicates that it is adequately reliable.
[*] IRELAND: New Rescue Process for Small Businesses Passed
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gill Stedman at RTE reports that small businesses that are
struggling financially are one step closer to being able to avail
of a new rescue process.
A bill passed all legislative stages in the Oireachtas on July 13,
which will provide for a Small Company Administrative Rescue
Process -- known as SCARP, RTE relates.
This will be similar to the existing examinership framework, but
aims to make the restructuring process quicker, easier and cheaper,
RTE notes.
It is expected to be signed into law by the President in the next
few days, RTE states.
According to RTE, Sven Spollen Behrens, Director of the Small Firms
Association said the bill offers small businesses with less than 50
employees a new dedicated rescue process.
Speaking on Morning Ireland, he described the process as an
alternative to the traditional examinership process, RTE relays.
Unlike the examinership process, businesses availing of SCARP will
not need to apply to the courts, as Mr. Spollen Behrens explained,
RTE discloses.
"A qualified insolvency practitioner will be appointed by the
company to begin engagement with the creditors to prepare a rescue
plan.
"By day 49 of the insolvency practitioner's appointment, the
creditors are then invited to vote on the rescue plan and the
process will be concluded in a much shorter period of time than the
traditional examinership process," RTE quotes Mr. Spollen Behrens
as saying.
According to RTE, Mr. Spollen Behrens said examinerships can
currently run for up to 150 days, whereas it is hoped this new
process will be concluded within 70 days.
"The new framework will make the restructuring of a small business
more accessible, faster, cheaper -- and it will hopefully save a
lot of businesses and jobs," he said.
The Small Firms Association said it expects many companies will
avail of this new process once it comes into operation, RTE
relays.
===================
L U X E M B O U R G
===================
GARFUNKELUX HOLDCO 2: Fitch Affirms B+ LT IDR, Outlook Now Positive
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has revised Garfunkelux Holdco 2 S.A.'s (Lowell)
Outlook to Positive from Stable, while affirming the company's
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B+'. It has also affirmed
Garfunkelux Holdco 3 S.A.'s (GH3) senior secured debt rating at
'B+' with a Recovery Rating of 'RR4'.
These rating actions are being taken in conjunction with a global
debt purchaser sector review, covering six publicly rated
companies.
Lowell is the Luxembourg-domiciled parent company of Lowell group,
a leading European debt purchaser with a primary focus on unsecured
consumer finance portfolios. The acquisition of Germany-based GFKL
Financial Services in 2015 and Intrum AB's Nordic carve-out
business in 2018 expanded Lowell's historically UK-centred
franchise to German-speaking markets (DACH) and Scandinavia
(northern European division).
GH3, the Luxembourg-domiciled note issuing entity and top holding
company of the restricted group (for the purpose of the senior
secured notes), is fully owned by Lowell. Lowell is majority-owned
by private equity funds controlled by Permira (63.9% beneficial
interest) with the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan (27.7%) and
management (8.2%) holding minority stakes.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
IDR
The Positive Outlook reflects Fitch's view that Lowell's Long-Term
IDR could be upgraded to 'BB-' over the next 12 to 18 months as a
result of further improvements to the company's EBITDA margin and
net profitability and stable or improving cash-flow leverage.
The Long-Term IDR reflects Lowell's well-established and
diversified franchise in some of Europe's largest debt-purchasing
markets, a robust business model supported by strong data
analytics, and consistent collection performance through economic
cycles. The rating also considers Lowell's historically
below-average profitability (with annual pre-tax losses between
2015 and 2020) and high cash-flow leverage which has, however,
improved following a refinancing exercise in 4Q20.
Lowell's performance in 2020, notably in its important UK market,
was negatively affected by a weaker collection performance in 2Q20
and 3Q20 but has since largely recovered with collection rates in
1Q21 exceeding the end-2019 static pool in all its markets (102% in
the UK and 104% overall). This compares with 82% and 89%,
respectively, in 2Q20. Compared with the 2008 financial crisis,
Lowell should be more resilient to pressure on collection revenue
because of a materially larger proportion of collections from
payment plans, a higher proportion of payment plans being subject
to affordability assessment and a large proportion of customers
eligible for government benefits.
Market conditions for capital deployment in 2H20 and 1Q21 remained
challenging and portfolio purchases in the 12 months (TTM) to
end-March 2021 were 29% lower yoy at GBP257 million but remained
marginally above Lowell's last 12-month replacement rate of GBP251
million required to keep its estimated remaining collections (ERC)
constant. Its 120 months ERC remained broadly flat at GBP3.4
billion at end-March 2021. For the full year, Lowell estimates
capital deployment at around GBP300 million, which Fitch deems
achievable given likely improving purchasing conditions in 2H21.
Diversification by jurisdiction and revenue contribution from less
balance sheet-intensive debt servicing activities is lower than
peers'. However, Lowell has strong franchises in all its markets,
which supports Fitch's assessment of its company profile. At
end-1Q21, 62% of its 120 months ERC related to its UK business, 23%
to the northern Europe division and 15% to DACH. By cash income,
its DACH division is larger (24% of cash income at TTM to end-1Q21)
due to a sizeable debt-servicing business, notably in Germany.
Overall, debt-service activities accounted for 16% of cash income
in 1Q21, which was lower than more diversified peers'.
Lowell's collection performance in recent years has been sound,
with gross-money multiples close to or above 2x. In addition,
actual gross-money multiples exceeded priced gross-money multiples
in most vintages, in particular in the years following the 2008
financial crisis. Lowell's pricing ability is supported by the
availability of comprehensive data and data analytics in all of the
company's markets.
Reported adjusted "cash" EBITDA (gross portfolio amortisation) TTM
to end-1Q21 was 2% lower yoy at GBP498 million. EBITDA margin
improved 230bp yoy in 1Q21, supported by ongoing cost savings.
Consequently, and also due to a lower interest expense run-rate
following the 4Q20 refinancing exercise, Lowell reported a modest
pre-tax profit in 1Q21 (GBP2.6 million) following sizeable pre-tax
losses since 2015.
Its gross debt/adjusted EBITDA, Fitch's core leverage metric for
debt purchasers, improved markedly since 4Q20 and stood at around
3.8x at end-1Q21, close to the 3.5x benchmark for leverage between
'b' and 'bb' range ratings. Under its base case, Fitch expects
gross debt/adjusted EBITDA to remain below 4x in 2021 and 2022
while under its downside case to approach 4.5x in 2022. Lowell
itself monitors leverage by reference to net debt/pro forma cash
EBITDA on a rolling 12-month basis, which at end-1Q21 stood at
3.6x, well within its stated target of 3.5x to 4.0x.
While the primary source of debt repayment is cash flows generated
from Lowell's ERC, the company's tangible equity is negative, even
when sizeable shareholder loans (treated as equity under relevant
Fitch criteria) are included.
Our assessment of Lowell's funding and liquidity profile considers
the absence of near-term maturities (until 2024) but also the
company's adjusted EBITDA/interest expense of 2.6x in 1Q21 (3.3x if
shareholder interest expense is excluded), which corresponds to the
'b' range. Liquidity at end-1Q21 (GBP498 million) was supported by
GBP69 million in unrestricted cash, GBP41 million securitisation
reset availability and EUR455 million in a revolving credit
facility (RCF) draw-down capacity.
SENIOR SECURED DEBT
The 'B+'/RR4 rating of GH3's senior secured debt, junior to
Lowell's sizeable RCF, reflects Fitch's view of average recoveries
(RR4) of this debt class.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
IDR
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:
-- Maintaining cash-flow leverage towards the lower end of
management's target range (net debt/EBITDA of 3.5x to 4.0x),
in particular if in conjunction with a wider EBITDA margin and
sustainably improved net profitability, could lead to an
upgrade of the Long-Term IDR to 'BB-';
-- Maintaining EBITDA/interest expense (excluding shareholder
interest payments) consistently above 3x would also support
positive rating action.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:
-- Cash-flow leverage (gross debt/EBITDA as calculated by Fitch)
exceeding 4.5x on a sustained basis, specifically if without
prospects of a short-term recovery, could lead to a revision
of the Outlook on the Long-Term IDR to Stable;
-- Cash-flow leverage exceeding 5.0x on a sustained basis could
lead to a downgrade of the Long-Term IDR;
-- A material weakening in EBITDA/interest expense, in particular
if without prospects of a short-term recovery, would also be
rating-negative.
SENIOR SECURED DEBT
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:
-- Positive rating action on Lowell's Long-Term IDR;
-- Improved recovery expectations, for instance, as a result of a
thinner layer of debt senior to the notes.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:
-- Negative rating action on Lowell's Long-Term IDR;
-- Weaker recovery expectations.
BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO
International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and
Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.
ESG CONSIDERATIONS
Lowell has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' in relation to 'Financial
Transparency', in view of the significance of internal modelling to
portfolio valuations and associated metrics such as estimated
remaining collections. However, this is a feature of the deb-
purchasing sector as a whole, and not specific to Lowell.
Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.
=========
S P A I N
=========
EL CORTE: S&P Affirms 'BB+' Long-Term ICR, Outlook Negative
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB+' long-term issuer credit
rating on El Corte Ingles (ECI) and its 'BBB-' issue rating on
ECI's senior unsecured debt.
The negative outlook reflects S&P's view that ECI's credit metrics
will be weaker than our benchmarks for the ratings in the next
12-18 months because of the lagging pandemic impact and uncertainty
on the pace of recovery, as well as on the group's ability to sell
noncore assets and restore its profitability and cash flows, such
that adjusted debt to EBITDA falls to less than 4.0x by the end of
FY2022.
ECI reported a 31.6% loss of revenue in FY 2020, with the fashion
and travel segments hit hardest by the pandemic's impact. This was
partly mitigated by the food and insurance divisions, together with
an enhanced online offering. Despite cost-savings measures
implemented throughout the year, ECI reported S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA of negative EUR457 million and free
operating cash flow (FOCF) of about negative EUR720 million. S&P's
adjusted EBITDA figure includes the significant provisions made by
the group, including for inventory write-downs, personnel, and
other items. Following these provisions, it views ECI's balance
sheet as better prepared to benefit from the expected economic
recovery.
The expansion of e-commerce in the retail market has been one of
the main secular trends in the retail industry over the last few
years, with consumers spending more and purchasing a wider range of
products online. This trend further accelerated in 2020 on the back
of store opening restrictions related to the pandemic. S&P said,
"We see the apparel category as particularly exposed to the impact
of the changing landscape, since the online share of total sales in
Europe, at about 20% according to Euromonitor, was already higher
than the overall retail industry average in 2019. In this context,
we view ECI's established online presence as positive. The group's
technology and logistics infrastructure, with a wide local
geographic reach, positions ECI well to continue gaining amid the
accelerating e-commerce trend. On this front, ECI's main
competition comes from pure online platforms such as Amazon,
Zalando, and ASOS, or from branded apparel and electronic
manufacturers reaching out to their clients directly or via online
platforms. Still, we note ECI, given its strong logistic and
infrastructure base, is very well positioned, with ability to
deliver on over 500,000 stock keeping units in less than two hours.
The group has made considerable progress with e-commerce, achieving
over 130% growth in online sales to EUR1.4 billion in FY2020, and
launching its own mobile app in September 2020, with online traffic
through the app gaining notable momentum. Generally, we expect ECI
will continue making selected store transformations, with a focus
on rightsizing the type and location of stores, and omnichannel
investments. We note the company boosted its omnichannel
capabilities, particularly during the pandemic, including enhanced
buy online, pick up in store, and same day delivery, to support
higher online traffic and sales. We estimate that in FY2021 the
group's topline will still fall short of the 2019 figure by
15%-20%, and only reach 85%-90% of FY2019 sales by FY2022."
S&P said, "Although we anticipate continued disruptions in fiscal
2021, we believe ECI will expand its earnings and reduce debt in
FY2021. This is because we assume that pandemic-related
restrictions will continue to ease and expect a certain level of
immunization to be achieved by the end of the third quarter. We
have witnessed in Spain a spike in consumer demand as soon as
restrictions have been lifted. Still, we note ECI generates about
10% of revenue from international travelers; this channel remains
depressed due to travel restrictions imposed. We also believe the
travel segment (18% of prepandemic revenue) remains the most
affected, and the timing and scale of recovery are uncertain as new
variants of the virus emerge. Moreover, we believe business travel
will take longer to recover, with some degree of demand being lost
permanently, as consumers and businesses change their behavior, due
to videoconferencing, a green agenda, smaller budgets, and other
factors. Nonetheless, we expect ECI's margins to recover to
prepandemic levels over the next two years, supported also by cost
efficiencies implemented, particularly in personnel. After posting
negative EBITDA in FY2020, we forecast ECI's EBITDA margin will
approach 6.5% in FY2021 and improve toward 7.0%-7.5% in FY2022
compared with 7.7% in FY2019.
"In the travel segment, ECI has recently announced a merger with
Logitravel, which will own 75% of the combined group. We expect
this to be a synergistic transaction, combining ECI--a strong
offline player--with Logitravel, a pure online company. At the same
time, we are mindful that the travel segment remains heavily
affected by the pandemic's impact and recovery remains uncertain.
In the food segment, ECI has agreed to acquire the Sanchez Romero
supermarket chain, thereby strengthening its positioning in the
premium food segment. In addition, we expect ECI to continue
expanding via new business lines, such as through Sicor, in the
home security segment, and emerge as a virtual mobile operator and
energy supplier under the Sweno brand. We view ECI as well
positioned to capitalize on its brand name, client base, and
infrastructure, to enter these new businesses. Nonetheless, we are
conscious of execution risks, particularly in light of ECI's
numerous ongoing projects."
ECI's debt issuances in the past 12 months and new revolving credit
facility (RCF) bolstered its liquidity position. The company ended
FY2020 with approximately EUR928 million in cash and EUR1,546
million of undrawn facilities. This addresses well ongoing
liquidity needs, including funding operations, working capital
obligations, and upcoming debt maturities (particularly the EUR600
million Hipercor bond due in January 2022).
S&P said, "We expect operating cash flow generation to improve
markedly in FY2021, supported by recovery trends. This, together
with expected working capital inflow and contained investments,
should bring FOCF for the year close to EUR500 million. In
addition, we believe that ECI's current financial policy, which
focuses on deleveraging, supports the current ratings. We
understand that ECI's management intends to maintain adequate
liquidity and execute on several strategic actions to promote
deleveraging. As such, we forecast S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
leverage metrics to decline toward 4.5x in FY2021 and below 4.0x in
FY2022.
"The negative outlook reflects our view that ECI's credit metrics
will be outside our rating thresholds for the next 12-18 months
because of the pandemic's impact and uncertainty regarding the
economic recovery. There is also uncertainty about whether the
group can sell noncore assets and restore its profitability and
cash flows, such that our adjusted debt-to-EBITDA metric falls to
less than 4.0x by the end of FY2022. We now expect ECI's debt to
EBITDA to fall below 5x in FY2021 and only go below 4.0x by end
FY2022.
"We could lower the ratings if ECI's operating performance and cash
flow generation fell short of our base case, weakening its
financial metrics, while the proceeds or pace of asset sales are
insufficient to support leverage reduction." In particular, S&P
could lower its ratings on ECI if:
-- The EBITDA margin fails to recover and is unlikely to reach at
least 7% on an S&P Global Ratings-adjusted basis, which could
pressure our business risk profile assessment.
-- S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA exceeds 5.0x by the
end of FY2021 and/or we no longer consider ECI likely to reduce S&P
Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA to less than 4.0x by the end
FY2022.
-- This could stem from a slower recovery than we currently
envisage, including due to prolonged pandemic-related disruptions,
such as continued lockdowns and travel restrictions; a decline in
real estate prices or consumer spending on discretionary goods; or
intense online and offline competition impairing earnings growth.
Although not S&P's base-case expectation, it could also lower the
rating on ECI's senior unsecured notes if ECI were to transfer a
material amount of assets to a new, separate real estate entity,
pledge its real retail estate assets, or raise material
prior-ranking debt.
S&P could revise the outlook on ECI to stable if it saw signs that
ECI's profitability is recovering to prepandemic levels and its
adjusted credit metrics are on track to sustainably reach:
-- Debt to EBITDA below 4.0x,
-- Funds from operations (FFO) to debt above 20%, and
-- Substantial FOCF.
This could happen if FY2022 and FY2023 results were at least in
line with S&P's base case, leading to meaningful leverage
reduction. To ensure comfortable headroom under the rating, ECI
would also need to keep its core real estate assets in the
operating entity.
A positive rating action would also depend on ECI demonstrating a
strong commitment to sustaining such improved financial metrics
through its financial policy, including, but not limited to, asset
sales to reduce debt.
LUNA III: Fitch Assigns FirstTime 'BB(EXP)' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Luna III S.a.r.l (Luna) an expected
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of 'BB(EXP)' and its proposed
EUR1,630 million term loan an expected senior secured rating of
'BB+(EXP)' with a Recovery Rating of 'RR2'. The Outlook on the
Long-Term IDR is Stable.
Luna would be the holding company of Urbaser S.A. (Sociedad
Unipersonal) post-acquisition by Platinum Equity (Platinum) and the
borrower of the proposed financing package. Its IDR is based on the
consolidated profile as both entities are part of a restricted
group under the proposed senior facilities documentation.
Luna's 'BB (EXP)' IDR reflects the post-acquisition capital
structure, which implies a re-leverage above Fitch's negative
sensitivity of 5.2x for the next two years. Rating strengths are a
stable and predictable revenue stream backed by long-term waste
contracts with municipalities with limited volume and price risk,
largely in Spain. The business is complemented by shorter-term and
more volatile contracted revenue with industrial and commercial
(I&C) counterparties.
The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectations of a return of the
leverage metrics to within Fitch's guidelines by 2023, failure of
which may result in a negative rating action.
The senior secured lenders will benefit from pledges over the
shares of the guarantors (summing up to around 80% of consolidated
EBITDA), material bank accounts and intercompany receivables, hence
their uplift of one notch versus the expected IDR.
The final ratings are subject to the acquisition of Urbaser by
Platinum from China Tianying, Inc (CNTY) and the final capital
structure conforming to Fitch's expectations. The final instrument
rating is subject to receiving final debt documentation confirming
the information already received.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Transaction-driven Re-leverage: The transaction values Urbaser at
EUR3.3 billion in enterprise value. Based on the proposed capital
structure post-acquisition, Luna will support part of the equity to
fund the acquisition and sizable transaction fees on its balance
sheet. The initial re-leverage is partially offset by the
monetisation of several carve-out adjustments related to entities
that will fall outside the rating scope post-acquisition and will
be sold back to CNTY before completion, and of subordinated loans
granted to the same entities. The carve-outs have a mildly positive
effect on Luna's credit risk profile.
Deleverage to Guidelines by 2023: The transaction implies an
increase in Luna's net debt of around EUR500 million, leading to a
peak in funds from operations (FFO) net leverage at 5.5x by 2022.
Fitch forecasts Luna to return to within Fitch's rating sensitivity
by 2023 on consistent deleveraging, on the back of a strong
contract backlog, moderate new contract wins and capex, operating
improvements and no dividend payments. Fitch views the execution
risk of its business plan as manageable.
Shareholder Support: Platinum has indicated to Fitch its commitment
to deleverage from the high 4.4x net debt/reported EBITDA (as
adjusted by Luna) at transaction closing, but has given no target.
Fitch believes Platinum will pursue deleveraging to strengthen the
capital structure during its investment horizon of four-to-five
years. Fitch expects support to be manifested in the absence of
dividend payments and financial support for opportunistic M&A,
which Fitch does not factor into Fitch's rating case.
New Owner's Strategy Credit-Positive: As a result of Platinum's
entry, Fitch expects Luna to refocus on organic growth in core
waste activities (as some non-waste activities are being carved out
and excluded from rating scope), with an increased focus on
developed economies (towards US away from China). Overall, Fitch
expects the new shareholder to prioritise operational improvements
over external growth.
Targeting Larger Efficiencies: Platinum will introduce an
efficiency programme to improve the cost structure of Luna, mainly
linked to procurement process, working capital management and
workforce productivity, and to reinforce the ESG profile of the
group. Platinum expects operational improvements on average of
EUR35 million per year in 2022-2025 (or about 2% of the cost base
in 2020), which Fitch sees as achievable given Platinum's record.
Therefore, Fitch incorporates in Fitch's case the bulk of expected
improvements, net of the operating spending and capex related to
the efficiency programme.
Subdued Policy-driven Growth by 2025: The waste sector benefits
from underlying positive structural dynamics, supported by stricter
regulations in Luna's main territories of operation. However, the
industrial plan shared by Platinum incorporates only modest organic
growth (limited new commercial wins in 2021 and 2022) and no
bolt-on acquisitions (as opposed to its recent strong phase of
growth). Modest capex plan from 2023 also mirrors fewer new
contracts and improved ratios of maintenance capex per contract.
Resilient Business Model: Luna has a resilient business model as an
integrated waste operator that provides good cash flow stability
and revenue predictability in the medium term. Long term-contracts
with municipalities for waste collection, waste treatment and water
management accounted for 78% of total EBITDA in 2020. The remainder
is largely composed of waste operations with I&C customers, which
are short-term contracted and intrinsically more volatile. Luna has
limited exposure to commodity risk.
Limited Revenue Volatility: Revenue has proven to be resilient
through the economic cycle, including during Covid-19, with some
limited volatility largely associated with waste-treatment volumes,
as waste-management fees are defined on per tonne basis, and prices
are revised largely in line with the CPI (or linked to main cost
references) on an annual basis.
Long-term Revenue Visibility: Urbaser's backlog of contracts by
end-2020 covers almost six years of revenues, with average standard
contract duration of around seven years for waste collection and 12
years for waste treatment. Contract renewal rate on average was 87%
in 2014-2020 (2020: 86%), reflecting Urbaser's strong market
position, high barriers to entry and valued technological
capabilities in waste treatment.
Moderate Concentration/Country Risk: Concentration risk is lower
than sector peers', with the top-20 contracts at around 28% of
total revenue and a revenue-weighted residual life of 10 years.
Urbaser's contractual base is very granular for the remaining 72%.
Non-profitable contracts are well-identified and monitored on
case-by-case basis. Luna has a moderate presence in Argentina (7%
of total revenue in 2020), with risks related to hyperinflation and
currency depreciation being partially offset by contract indexation
clauses (revised every three months) and Argentinian
peso-denominated debt.
DERIVATION SUMMARY
Luna's IDR is supported by a strong business profile that compares
favourably with most of the peers', while higher leverage weighing
on the 'BB' rating.
Fitch sees local competitor, FCC Servicios Medioambiente Holding
S.A.U. (FCC MA; BBB-/Stable), as the closest peer for Luna. Fitch
sees lower business risk for FCC MA due to its stronger integrated
market position in Spain and the better credit quality of its
international operations, which are partially offset by Luna's
higher margins. However, Luna's new strategy of refocusing on
organic growth and developed countries will narrow the
debt-capacity differential between the two. Currently, FCC MA's
significantly lower leverage explains the bulk of the two-notch
difference.
Compared with the top-three US operators, Waste Management, Inc
(BBB+/Stable), Republic Services, Inc (BBB/Stable) and Waste
Connections, Inc (BBB+/Stable), Luna shares similar operational
stability through exclusive municipal long-term contracts, although
the scale of all these US peers is larger (by 5x-8x). Their
entrenched position in the US, collectively garnering more than one
third of the country's market share, also allows stronger profit
margin and pricing power. However, Luna is less exposed to I&C
end-customers and to commodity risk. In addition to better business
risk, US peers have significantly lower leverage and maintain
positive free cash flow (FCF) generation due to the mature US
market.
Compared with integrated global leaders like Veolia Environement
S.A. (BBB/Stable), Luna is significantly smaller and less
geographically diversified. Luna also lacks meaningful
diversification into low-risk water activities that is a credit
strength for Veolia. However, Veolia has worse credit metrics than
Luna. Overall, the difference in ratings reflect a worse business
risk that is not offset by Luna's slightly better financial
profile.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:
-- Acquisition to close in September 2021;
-- Proposed capital structure as shared by the company. This is
based on the signed agreement with CNTY for the transaction's
purchase price and related carve outs and the proposed debt
structure post-transaction;
-- Stable waste volumes and price growth to 2025, in line with
CPI forecasts and foreign exchange of countries of operations;
-- Renewal rate of 83.6% for waste collection contracts and 90%
for waste treatment to 2025;
-- New contract awards only in 2021-2022, adding on average EUR65
million of revenue in these two years;
-- EBITDAR margin on average at around 18% for 2021-2025 (urban
services: 15%; waste treatment: 28%);
-- Capex on average at EUR231 million per year for 2021-2025;
-- No M&A;
-- No dividend distributions; and
-- Restricted cash of EUR40.4 million linked to project-finance
reserve accounts, overseas blocked cash and working-capital
needs.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:
-- Deleveraging leading to FFO net leverage below 4.4x and FFO
interest coverage above 3.5x on a sustained basis;
-- Positive-to-neutral FCF.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:
-- Failure to deleverage below 5.2x by 2023 would be negative for
the rating;
-- FFO interest coverage below 2.5x on a sustained basis;
-- Material changes to concession or public contracts
agreements/regulatory framework, to the extent such changes
are not financially favourable.
BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO
International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.
LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE
Healthy Liquidity Post-Transaction: At transaction closing, Luna's
liquidity position and debt structure will be enhanced by the
long-term structure of the proposed financing package. In addition,
Fitch expects around EUR500 million of Urbaser's existing debt,
largely project-finance, to be rolled over at closing.
Expected cash at closing of EUR300 million (before usual
adjustments made by Fitch) and available committed credit
facilities of EUR400 million maturing in 2027 are sized to cover
the capex plan up until to 2025. Luna is a highly cash-generative
business, so notwithstanding the high capex in 2021-2022 and in the
absence of dividends payments and M&A, cash would be accruing on
balance sheet from 2022. The EUR1,630 million term loan has a
bullet structure and maturity in 2028.
Improved Debt Structure: Post-transaction, more than 75% of the
debt will be placed at the holdco level, with a significant amount
of opco debt being prepaid at closing, easing the risk of
structural subordination. As per the proposed senior facilities
documentation, the senior facilities will be guaranteed by material
subsidiaries jointly representing around 80% of consolidated
EBITDA. The draft financing documentation is covenant-lite,
providing limited covenant protection to creditors, in Fitch's
view.
ISSUER PROFILE
Luna will become the sole parent of Urbaser after its acquisition.
Urbaser is a leading Spanish integrated waste management company
providing domestic waste collection and street cleaning services
(42% of consolidated 2020 EBITDA) as well as solid waste-treatment
activities (54%) largely to municipalities and secondarily to I&C
clients. Around 66% of the business is domestic, with the remainder
in France, Nordics, Latam and the Middle East.
ESG CONSIDERATIONS
Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.
LUNA III: S&P Assigns Prelim 'BB-' Long-Term ICR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary 'BB-' long-term issuer
credit rating to Urbaser S.A.U.'s Spain-based parent company, Luna
III S.a.r.l. S&P also assigned its preliminary 'BB-' issue rating
and '3' recovery ratings to the proposed $1.63 billion term loan B
due in 2028.
The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that revenue will
grow by close to 10% in 2021 thanks to new contract wins, and
profitability will begin to improve in 2022 as the sponsor
implements operational improvement initiatives such that S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA remains below 5x on an ongoing
basis.
Private equity firm Platinum Equity intends to acquire Urbaser
S.A.U. from China Tianying for an enterprise value of EUR3.3
billion.
S&P expects the transaction to close in the second half of 2021,
primarily financed with EUR1.63 billion in debt and EUR1.11 billion
in equity from financial sponsor Platinum Equity.
S&P said, "We expect modest leverage reduction over the next 12-18
months. Although Luna is owned by financial sponsor Platinum
Equity, we expect Luna will have an adjusted debt to EBITDA just
above 5x--the low-end of what we typically see for sponsor-owned
companies--at the end of 2021, dropping below 5x by year-end 2022.
Over the next 12-18 months, we expect the company to experience
continued growth in revenue, operating margins, and free operating
cash flow (FOCF) thanks to new contract wins and moderate cost
inflation, favorable industry tailwinds increasing demand for
sustainable specialty waste services, and the realization of
various process-improvement and cost-reduction initiatives
currently underway. We also expect the company to continue to
actively integrate bolt-on acquisitions to expand its service
offerings and geographic footprint, but we do not think this would
materially affect its credit metrics on a sustained basis."
Luna's high barriers to entry and leading market share help drive
profitability and cash flow. The waste management services portion
of the business enjoys high barriers to entry and high switching
costs for customers, since the large capital outlays required at
the start or renewal of a contract are embedded into the pricing.
High renewal rates for contracts of close to 90% lead to high
revenue visibility. Specifically, the top 20 customers by revenue
have been contracted with the company for an average of about 17
years, with about nine years to contract expiry on average. The
company also maintains a leading market share in waste treatment
and the No. 2 market share in waste collection in Spain. Luna
operates the fifth largest waste management company in Europe.
These strengths benefit Luna's profitability, since the company has
maintained adjusted EBITDA margins at the high end of the average
range for environmental services firms. Some lumpiness in capital
spending may increase the variability of cash flow periodically,
but Luna still maintains decent cash flow conversion. The high
barriers to entry and leading market shares, combined with the
sponsor's focus on operating improvement opportunities, should help
the company maintain its margins above its competitors'.
Secular industry tailwinds will support growth. S&P expects
population growth and increased circular economy focus will support
increased demand for sustainable waste collection, urban cleaning
services, and waste treatment services. The waste treatment
industry is shifting away from landfill usage and Luna is well
positioned to support this trend because the company is
underexposed to landfills compared to its competitors. This should
support steady growth of the company's EUR12 billion backlog,
resulting in healthy growth of about 1%-3%, excluding new contract
wins for 2021.
Since Luna provides a critical and nondiscretionary service for its
customers' daily business activities, the pandemic did not
significantly harm the company's performance. Total EBITDA for 2020
reduced by about 7%, primarily within the waste treatment segment,
as industrial and manufacturing activity, as well as tourism,
declined in large cities. Lower oil prices and an increase in
personal protective equipment expenses also factored into lower
earnings. S&P expects Luna to recapture a portion of the lost
EBITDA in 2021 and thereafter as industrial and manufacturing
activities and tourism recover, especially in the second half of
2021.
S&P said, "Based on the preliminary documentation, we view the
preferred equity as equity under our criteria. We consider that
the yet-to-be-finalized preferred shares held by Platinum Equity
qualify for equity treatment. This includes the expected preferred
coupon rate, equity-stapling clause, and the preferred shares'
highly subordinated and default-free features. In addition,
redemption of the preferred shares can only occur 30 days after the
maturity of debt.
"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the company's
recurring revenue stream and favorable industry tailwinds should
allow it to generate appropriate credit measures for the rating
over the next 12-18 months. We expect the company to deliver
adjusted debt to EBITDA below 5x by the end of 2022 supported by
stable demand and expected operating improvement initiatives."
S&P may lower its rating on Luna over the next 12-18 months if:
-- Adjusted debt to EBITDA remains above 5x on a sustained basis
with no clear prospects for improvement;
-- The company pursues an aggressive financial policy, resulting,
for example, in debt-funded acquisitions or shareholder
distributions that increase adjusted debt to EBITDA above the
aforementioned level;
-- Adjusted funds from operations (FFO) to debt decline below 12%
on an ongoing basis; or
-- FOCF turns negative.
Although unlikely, S&P may raise its rating on Luna over the next
12 months if:
-- Adjusted debt to EBITDA remains below 4x on a sustained basis;
-- The sponsor commits to maintaining leverage below the
aforementioned level, inclusive of any shareholder rewards or
debt-funded acquisitions;
-- FFO to debt improves above 20% on an ongoing basis; and
-- FOCF to debt improves above 10% on an ongoing basis.
RMBS SANTANDER 7: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to EUR530MM B Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned definitive ratings to Notes
issued by FONDO DE TITULIZACION RMBS SANTANDER 7:
EUR4,770M Serie A Notes due February 2067, Definitive Rating
Assigned Aa1 (sf)
EUR530M Serie B Notes due February 2067, Definitive Rating
Assigned B3 (sf)
Moody's has not rated the EUR265M Serie C Notes due February 2067.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The Notes are backed by a pool of Spanish prime residential
mortgage loans originated by Banco Santander S.A. (Spain) (A2/P-1;
A3(cr)/P-2(cr)), Banco Espanol de Credito, S.A. ("Banesto", NR) and
Banco Popular S.A. (NR). This represents the 7th issuance out of
the RMBS Santander securitization label.
The final portfolio amounts to approximately EUR5,300 million. The
reserve fund has been funded to 5.0% of the rated Notes balance at
closing and the total credit enhancement for Class A Notes is
15.0%.
The ratings are primarily based on the credit quality of the
portfolio, the structural features of the transaction and its legal
integrity.
The key drivers for the portfolio's expected loss of 3.5% are: (i)
performance of the originators' preceding transactions; (ii)
benchmarking with comparable transactions in the Spanish RMBS
market; (iii) analysis of the static information on defaults,
delinquencies and recoveries received from Banco Santander S.A.
(Spain) and Banco Popular S.A. to rate precedent deals; and (iv)
current economic environment in Spain.
According to Moody's, the transaction benefits from various credit
strengths such as a granular portfolio and an amortising reserve
fund sized at 5.0% of Class A and B Notes balance. However, Moody's
notes that the transaction features some credit weaknesses such as:
(i) the fact that 0.95% of the loans in the pool are currently in
arrears; (ii) the exposure to 5.0% of restructured loans; and (iii)
the fact that 4.4% of the borrowers are not Spanish nationals.
Moody's determined the portfolio lifetime expected loss of 3.5% and
a Aa1 MILAN credit enhancement ("MILAN CE") of 12.0% related to
borrower receivables. The expected loss captures Moody's
expectations of performance considering the current economic
outlook, while the MILAN CE captures the loss Moody's expect the
portfolio to suffer in the event of a severe recession scenario.
Expected loss and MILAN CE are parameters used by Moody's to
calibrate its lognormal portfolio loss distribution curve and to
associate a probability with each potential future loss scenario in
the ABSROM cash flow model to rate RMBS.
Portfolio expected loss of 3.5%: This is lower than the Spanish
Prime RMBS sector average and is based on Moody's assessment of the
lifetime loss expectation for the pool taking into account: (i) the
collateral performance of the originator's book and of previously
securitised portfolios; (ii) the high weighted average seasoning of
around 12 years, and (iii) the current macroeconomic environment in
Spain.
MILAN CE of 12.0%: This is lower than the Spanish Prime RMBS sector
average and follows Moody's assessment of the loan-by-loan
information taking into account the following key drivers: (i) the
low weighted average current loan-to-value of 65.1%; (ii) the fact
that 0.95% of the loans in the pool are currently in arrears; (iii)
the fact that 4.4% of the borrowers are not Spanish nationals; and
(iv) the 5.0% exposure to restructured loans.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's
Approach to Rating RMBS Using the MILAN Framework" published in
December 2020.
The analysis undertaken by Moody's at the initial assignment of
ratings for RMBS securities may focus on aspects that become less
relevant or typically remain unchanged during the surveillance
stage.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:
Factors that would lead to an upgrade of the ratings include:
significantly better-than-expected performance of the pool combined
with an increase of the Spanish Local Currency Country Ceiling.
Factors that would lead to a downgrade of the ratings include: (i)
increased counterparty risk leading to potential operational risk
of servicing or cash management interruptions; and (ii) economic
conditions being worse than forecast resulting in higher arrears
and losses.
===========================
U N I T E D K I N G D O M
===========================
A & A LTD: Brothers Banned from Acting as Company Directors
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Insolvency Service on July 2 disclosed that Abul Azad, Abul
Ashraf, and Abul Khaled, have been banned from acting as company
directors for 7 years, 7 years, and 3-and-a-half years
respectively.
The three brothers, all from Melton Mowbray, were directors of A &
A (Melton Mowbray) Limited and shared the running of the Apurba,
Bombay Brasserie and Tandoori Knights Indian restaurants.
However, they deliberately or recklessly destroyed or removed sales
records in their company accounts in order to avoid paying the full
VAT and corporation tax amounts that were due. In total,
GBP566,749 was owing to HMRC when the brothers placed the company
into liquidation.
Throughout the Insolvency Service investigation, the brothers
sought to discredit and place blame on the company's accountant,
despite receiving written warnings from the accountant in
successive years that the company had inadequate record keeping
processes in place and that it was obvious that cash and sales
records were going missing. In some cases, sales identified solely
through card payment data was found to be more than their total
reported sales, which also included cash payments.
Abul Azad and Abul Ashraf signed disqualification undertakings
accepting that they caused or allowed the company to suppress its
sales over a period of at least 4-and-a-half years, to the
detriment of HMRC. Their bans begin on 6 July 2021 and last for 7
years.
Abul Khaled, who was only a director of the company for a short
time during the period, admitted to causing or allowing the company
to suppress its sales over a period of at least 8 months. His ban
of 3-and-a-half years also begins on July 6, 2021.
Cassandra Dowthwaite, Deputy Head of Insolvent Investigations
(North) at the Insolvency Service, said:
"This ban should serve as a warning to other directors tempted to
conceal sales and withhold taxes, which are needed to fund vital
public services, for their own benefit."
Companies have limited liability, which is a privilege, not a
right, and The Insolvency Service have strong enforcement powers
which we will not hesitate to use to remove that privilege from
dishonest or reckless directors."
GREENSILL CAPITAL: Shop Direct Holdings to Repay Debt in Full
-------------------------------------------------------------
Patricia Nilsson and Robert Smith at The Financial Times report
that the Barclay family's retail empire is paying off its debt to
Greensill Capital in full as it weighs a flotation of Very Group,
the UK's second-largest ecommerce company.
An initial public offering could take place as early as next year,
according to one person close to the company, although a partial
stake sale remains an option, the FT relates.
STJ Advisors have been appointed to work with the company ahead of
a possible listing that would mark the first time the family has
taken one of its businesses public, the FT discloses. An IPO could
leave the family in line for a GBP4 billion windfall, according to
Sky News, which first reported the potential flotation, the FT
notes.
Very's parent company Shop Direct Holdings Limited borrowed heavily
from Greensill Capital, the supply chain finance firm that
collapsed in March in one of the year's biggest financial scandals,
the FT recounts.
The company announced on July 16 that SDHL was set to repay all of
its outstanding debt to Greensill's administrators, the FT
discloses.
The group borrowed from Greensill in part to fund investment in a
new warehouse facility near Derby, the FT states. A recent
investor update from Credit Suisse, which invested heavily in
Greensill's bond-like products, showed that two companies related
to Very had about US$300 million of this debt outstanding, most of
which was overdue for repayment, the FT relays.
PINNACLE BIDCO: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR, Alters Outlook to Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed all ratings on Pinnacle
Bidco plc ("PureGym" or "the company"), the top entity of the
borrowing group of a leading budget gym operator in the UK and
Denmark. This includes the company's corporate family rating of B3,
probability of default rating of B3-PD, the B3 ratings on the
company's EUR and GBP backed senior secured notes all due 2025, and
the Ba3 rating on the GBP145 million super senior revolving credit
facility (SSRCF) due 2024. The outlook on all ratings is changed to
stable from negative.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The change in outlook to stable reflects the company's good
liquidity discipline, successful re-opening of the gyms
post-lockdown this year and Moody's expectation that PureGym will
de-lever to below 7.5x over the next 12-18 months. The ratings are
supported by the company's efficient operating model, its
competitive and flexible offering and by user-friendly technology,
that should help PureGym to recover quicker than peers. Moody's
expects PureGym to benefit from its value positioning compared to
the broader fitness and leisure market because some individuals may
decide to trade down towards value offerings from midmarket or
premium gyms as well as capture members of financially distressed
gyms. PureGym also benefits from an element of geographic
diversification, although the current crisis is global.
PureGym was hit by the government decisions to close gyms for a
significant portion of 2020 and Q1 2021 in all countries where the
company operates including the UK, Denmark and Switzerland. PureGym
has focussed on cost reduction and benefitted from the government
schemes to compensate for staff payroll as well as a business rates
holiday in the UK. Thanks to the mitigating measures the total cash
burn during 2020 and Q1 2021 was GBP134 million, including more
than GBP40 million of expansionary capex, although in addition
approximately GBP38 million of various payments were postponed into
late 2021. Moody's positively notes that the company's owners
provided GBP100 million of equity support which covered a sizeable
portion of the cash burn.
The company's business has a high degree of operating leverage, as
the operating costs of running a gym are quite stable relative to
the level of attendance. This means it is crucial for the company
to quickly recover membership levels to avoid a disproportionate
reduction in the company's margins and cash flow generation.
Moody's understands that by end of June the company achieved
like-for-like memberships at circa 83% of 2019 level in the key UK
market and 82% in Denmark. The figures only include paying members
(excludes "frozen") and indicate a solid demand.
Moody's base case assumptions are that the member levels will
recover to the pre-crisis level by the end of 2021. However,
Moody's estimates that Moody's-adjusted debt/EBITDA will remain
well above 10x this year before reducing below 7x in 2022. This
compares to around 6.5x leverage in 2019 pro-forma for the Fitness
World acquisition.
PureGym has had to incur additional costs linked to the pandemic,
including cleaning and testing ("corona passes" in Denmark) as well
as limit the capacity of its gyms to ensure a safe layout, which
could slow down margin recovery despite the strong demand. More
positively, according to the government's plans, most of the
restrictions in the UK and Denmark will be lifted before
September.
In Moody's base case PureGym's free cash flow (FCF) will be
negative in 2021 by about GBP60 million, even before expansionary
capital spending, which the rating agency expects could be around
GBP35 million. Moody's expects PureGym to continue expanding its
network in the UK and Switzerland. Moody's models that the group
would have sufficient internally generated cash flows to fund
around 30 new gyms which will result in close to zero FCF in 2022.
Moody's understands that PureGym is also exploring equity raising
options, including potential public markets, to further accelerate
its network expansion and to invest more into its existing sites
and technology assets.
Moody's considers certain governance considerations related to
PureGym. The company is owned by Leonard Green & Partners which, as
is common for private equity firms, has a high tolerance for
leverage and appetite for debt-funded acquisition. More positively,
Moody's views the owner's commitment to the business as relatively
strong with a track record of equity support.
Moody's highlights the inherent challenges involved in modelling
profitability and cash flows in times of great uncertainty. Indeed,
risk of new virus variants leading to potential new restrictions
may significantly delay recovery for PureGym.
LIQUIDITY
PureGym's liquidity is adequate and supported by GBP81 million cash
on balance sheet as of March 2021, which includes EUR45 million tap
bond issuance. In addition, the company has access to the fully
undrawn GBP145 million SSRCF. The SSRCF has one springing covenant
that is tested when the facility is over 40% drawn, but this has
been replaced with a GBP30 million minimum liquidity test.
STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS
The capital structure comprises GBP430 million and EUR490 million
of backed senior secured notes due 2025 and a GBP145 million SSRCF
due 2024. The B3 instrument rating on the notes is in line with the
company's CFR while the Ba3 instrument rating on the RCF reflects
its super senior ranking ahead of the notes.
RATIONALE FOR STABLE OUTLOOK:
The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the company
will continue to maintain adequate liquidity and will successfully
de-lever to around 7x during 2022 by recovering its membership base
after the pandemic and opening new gyms.
FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS
Moody's could upgrade the company's rating if (1) the company
continues returns to positive organic revenue and EBITDA growth;
(2) Moody's adjusted Debt/EBITDA reduces sustainably below 6.5x;
(3) EBITA / Interest improves towards 1.5x; and (4) the company
maintains an adequate liquidity profile while it continues to scale
up its operations.
Moody's could downgrade PureGym's ratings if: (1) liquidity
deteriorates; (2) Moody's adjusted gross leverage remains above
7.5x over the next 12 months; (3) EBITA /interest is sustained
below 1x; or (4) if there is any material and sustained decline in
number of members or in membership yield.
PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY
The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.
LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS
Affirmations:
Issuer: Pinnacle Bidco plc
Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD
LT Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Ba3
BACKED Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B3
Outlook Actions:
Issuer: Pinnacle Bidco plc
Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative
PROFILE
Founded in 2009 PureGym is the third-largest health and fitness
club operator in Europe by number of members. As of May 2021, the
group had 1.6 million members and 506 gyms across the UK, Denmark
and Switzerland. Pro-forma for the Fitness World acquisition,
PureGym's revenue in 2019 was around GBP447 million and
company-adjusted EBITDA was GBP132 million (before IFRS 16 impact).
Private equity firm Leonard Green & Partners holds 79% of the
company and the remaining 21% is owned by management.
POUNDSTRETCHER: Estate Shrinks by 75 Stores Following CVA
---------------------------------------------------------
Steve Farrell at The Grocer reports that Poundstretcher's estate
has shrunk by 75 stores since it launched a company voluntary
arrangement (CVA) rescue plan a year ago.
According to The Grocer, it shows the business had 437 stores in
July 2020 and 362 this month.
The numbers include stores trading under the variety discounter's
'Bargain Buys' banner, The Grocer discloses. They dropped from 79
to 61 stores, while branches under the Poundstretcher banner fell
from 358 to 301, The Grocer states.
The net decline comes despite Poundstretcher also opening stores,
meaning the number to have closed will be higher, The Grocer
notes.
The CVA, launched in June last year, put more than half of
Poundstretcher's estate at risk of closure dependent on performance
and landlord co-operation, The Grocer recounts. However, in
October plans to offset the closures with 50 new openings were
confirmed by Poundstretcher and its restructuring partner KPMG,
according to The Grocer.
PRODIGY FINANCE CM2021-1: Moody's Gives Ba1 Rating to Cl. D Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned the following definitive
ratings to Notes issued by Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 Designated
Activity Company:
USD227,590,000 Class A First Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate
Notes due July 2051, Definitive Rating Assigned Aa3 (sf)
USD22,760,000 Class B Second Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate
Notes due July 2051, Definitive Rating Assigned A1 (sf)
USD19,720,000 Class C Third Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate
Notes due July 2051, Definitive Rating Assigned A2 (sf)
USD18,210,000 Class D Fourth Priority Subordinated Floating Rate
Notes due July 2051, Definitive Rating Assigned Ba1 (sf)
RATINGS RATIONALE
The Notes are backed by a pool of international student loans
originated by Prodigy Finance Limited (NR). This represents the
first issuance out of the Prodigy label.
The portfolio consists of approximately USD 303 million of loans as
of June 7th pool cut-off date. The non-amortising reserve account
has been funded to 1.2% of the total pool balance at closing and
the total credit enhancement for the Class A Notes is 26.2%.
The ratings are primarily based on the credit quality of the
portfolio, the structural features of the transaction and its legal
integrity.
The ratings also consider high social risk attributable to the debt
burden of student loans and the affordability of education in the
US. Potential regulatory or legislative changes could impact funds
available to the trust.
According to Moody's, the transaction benefits from various credit
strengths such as a granular portfolio, a non-amortising reserve
account sized at 1.2% of the total pool balance and a
non-amortising capitalized interest account sized at 0.5% of the
initial pool balance which will be available during the first two
years after closing. However, Moody's notes that the transaction
features some credit weaknesses such as an unrated servicer with an
untested business model and the servicing complexity related to
international borrowers. Various mitigants have been included in
the transaction structure such as a back-up servicer and a US
back-up servicer which will step in upon Prodigy's insolvency or
other servicer termination events. Moody's has concluded a maximum
achievable rating of Aa3 (sf) for the Notes because the different
structural features introduced to protect the transaction from
servicing disruption and other risks do not fully mitigate the
risks outlined above.
Moody's determined the portfolio lifetime expected defaults of
7.0%, expected recoveries of 25.0% and Aaa portfolio credit
enhancement ("PCE") of 30.0% related to borrower receivables. The
expected defaults and recoveries capture Moody's expectations of
performance considering the current economic outlook, while the PCE
captures the loss Moody's expect the portfolio to suffer in the
event of a severe recession scenario. Expected defaults and PCE are
parameters used by Moody's to calibrate its lognormal portfolio
loss distribution curve and to associate a probability with each
potential future loss scenario in the ABSROM cash flow model to
rate Consumer ABS.
Portfolio expected defaults of 7.0% are in line with the US
non-refinancing private student loan ABS and EMEA consumer loan ABS
average and are based on Moody's assessment of the lifetime
expectation for the pool taking into account (i) limited historic
performance of the loan book of the originator, (ii) the fact that
24.3% of the loans in the pool are currently in grace period and
4.4% are in some form of payment arrangement, (iii) benchmark
transactions, and (iv) other qualitative considerations.
Portfolio expected recoveries of 25.0% are in line with the US
non-refinancing private student loan ABS average and higher than
the EMEA consumer loan ABS average and are based on Moody's
assessment of the lifetime expectation for the pool taking into
account considerations (i) limited historic performance of the loan
book of the originator, (ii) benchmark transactions, and (iii)
other qualitative considerations.
PCE of 30.0% is higher than the US non-refinancing private student
loan ABS and EMEA consumer loan ABS average and is based on Moody's
assessment of the pool which is mainly driven by: (i) the
evaluation of the underlying portfolio, complemented by the
historical performance information as provided by the originator,
(ii) the relative ranking to originator peers in the US private
student loan sector and the EMEA consumer loan market and (iii)
other qualitative considerations, such as the exposure to loans
denominated in a currency different than that in which borrowers
receive their salary and the untested business model of the
originator. The PCE of 30.0% results in an implied coefficient of
variation (CoV) of 46.9%.
Rating Methodology:
The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's
Approach to Rating Consumer Loan-Backed ABS" published in July
2020.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:
Factors that may cause an upgrade of the ratings of the notes
include significantly better than expected performance of the pool
together with an increase in credit enhancement of Notes.
Factors that would lead to a downgrade of the ratings include: (i)
increased counterparty risk leading to potential operational risk
of (a) servicing or cash management interruptions; and (ii)
economic conditions being worse than forecast resulting in higher
arrears and losses.
SECOND HOME: Obtains Waiver from Lender After Covenant Breach
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bryce Elder at The Financial Times reports that lenders have given
a second chance to Second Home, the upscale WeWork wannabe founded
by former Downing Street policymaker Rohan Silva.
According to the FT, accounts filed last week by Second Home showed
the company breached its main debt covenant in March and will
probably fail the March 2022 check as well.
For the year to December 2019 Second Home reported revenue of
GBP9.8 million, largely from membership subscriptions, the FT
discloses. But administrative fees doubled to GBP13.2 million as
Second Home opened new clubs in London and Los Angeles, bringing
its total to six, the FT notes. Currency losses, loan interest and
depreciation charges raised the total loss to GBP15.7 million which
depleted cash reserves to just GBP5.5 million, the FT states.
Since then the company has tapped the UK government's Future Fund
coronavirus support scheme for the maximum loan of GBP5 million,
which was matched by existing shareholders, and received a waiver
from main lender Metro Bank that holds until September 2021, the FT
relates. Directors anticipate continued grace over debts but were
yet to receive any firm assurances, according to the FT.
A covenant breach would allow the bank to recall loans, which
Second Home referred to as a "severe but plausible downside
scenario", the FT states. Directors therefore added a "going
concern" warning to the accounts, reflecting the risks that lenders
might take a tougher approach to waivers and that Covid disruption
might be more severe than anticipated, the FT relays.
===============
X X X X X X X X
===============
[*] BOND PRICING: For the Week July 12 to July 16, 2021
-------------------------------------------------------
Issuer Coupon Maturity Currency Price
------ ------ -------- -------- -----
Fuerstenberg Capital I 5.625 EUR 44.445
Casino Guichard Perrac 3.992 EUR 67.940
Casino Guichard Perrac 0.767 EUR 38.774
Rallye SA 4.000 04/02/2021 EUR 28.333
Intralot Capital Luxem 5.250 9/15/2024 EUR 57.610
Obrascon Huarte Lain S 4.750 3/15/2022 EUR 70.500
Mitsubishi UFJ Investo 3.960 12/15/2050 EUR 58.693
PB International BV 7.625 1/26/2022 USD 27.000
Accor SA 0.700 12/07/2027 EUR 55.793
Air France-KLM 0.125 3/25/2026 EUR 15.388
Andrade Gutierrez Inte 9.500 12/30/2024 USD 53.484
Naviera Armas SA 6.500 7/31/2023 EUR 60.240
Orient Express Bank PJ 10.000 USD 30.750
Mallinckrodt Internati 5.750 08/01/2022 USD 74.250
VIC Properties SA 3.000 5/28/2025 EUR 70.000
Distribuidora Internac 0.875 04/06/2023 EUR 67.298
BNP Paribas SA 7.625 USD 99.963
Norwegian Air Shuttle 7.250 11/11/2022 EUR 45.000
Korian SA 0.875 03/06/2027 EUR 57.157
Jain International Tra 7.125 02/01/2022 USD 21.000
FIGEAC-AERO 1.125 10/18/2022 EUR 21.542
Obrascon Huarte Lain S 5.500 3/15/2023 EUR 69.339
Mallinckrodt Internati 4.750 4/15/2023 USD 11.500
Moby SpA 7.750 2/15/2023 EUR 23.557
EYEMAXX Real Estate AG 5.500 4/26/2023 EUR 71.390
O1 Properties Finance 0.500 9/27/2028 USD 14.000
Rallye SA 4.371 1/23/2023 EUR 28.000
Voltalia SA 1.000 1/13/2025 EUR 33.251
Quadient SA 3.375 EUR 57.735
HOCHDORF Holding AG 2.500 CHF 53.080
Cooperativa Muratori & 6.000 2/15/2023 EUR 2.880
Biocartis Group NV 4.000 05/09/2024 EUR 70.044
Neoen SA 2.000 06/02/2025 EUR 58.060
Econocom Group SA/NV 0.500 03/06/2023 EUR 7.327
Wirecard AG 0.500 09/11/2024 EUR 9.006
Cooperativa Muratori & 6.875 08/01/2022 EUR 2.596
Officine Maccaferri-Sp 5.750 06/01/2021 EUR 35.515
Pierre Et Vacances SA 2.000 04/01/2023 EUR 29.226
Nexity SA 0.125 01/01/2023 EUR 65.615
Nostrum Oil & Gas Fina 8.000 7/25/2022 USD 23.500
Union Fenosa Preferent 1.113 EUR 70.420
Maisons du Monde SA 0.125 12/06/2023 EUR 44.132
Neoen SA 1.875 10/07/2024 EUR 49.203
Vallourec SA 4.125 10/04/2022 EUR 5.948
Korian SA 2.500 EUR 43.096
Mallinckrodt Internati 5.625 10/15/2023 USD 75.000
Turkey Government Bond 8.000 03/12/2025 TRY 72.800
Naviera Armas SA 4.250 11/15/2024 EUR 60.295
Paper Industries Inter 6.000 03/01/2025 EUR 70.000
Intelsat Jackson Holdi 5.500 08/01/2023 USD 62.000
Valaris plc 7.750 02/01/2026 USD 11.000
Metro Bank PLC 5.500 6/26/2028 GBP 60.617
Rallye SA 3.250 02/08/2024 CHF 28.007
Koninklijke Luchtvaart 0.750 CHF 25.000
Norwegian Air Shuttle 5.000 02/07/2023 SEK 46.322
Valaris plc 5.200 3/15/2025 USD 11.000
Intu Debenture PLC 5.562 12/31/2027 GBP 46.833
SAS AB 3.406 SEK 71.000
Stockmann OYJ Abp 10.750 EUR 44.750
Intelsat Luxembourg SA 8.125 06/01/2023 USD 8.125
Hurricane Energy PLC 7.500 7/24/2022 USD 50.425
Fuerstenberg Capital E 1.301 EUR 44.333
Rallye SA 5.250 02/01/2022 EUR 27.929
Genfit 3.500 10/16/2025 EUR 19.177
Scandinavian Airlines 0.625 CHF 23.261
Wasps Finance Plc 6.500 5/13/2022 GBP 70.299
Travelex Financing PLC 8.000 5/15/2022 EUR 1.588
Mallinckrodt Internati 5.500 4/15/2025 USD 75.000
Thomas Cook Group PLC 6.250 6/15/2022 EUR 0.836
Nexity SA 0.250 03/02/2025 EUR 69.151
Cabonline Group Holdin 7.500 12/09/2022 SEK 80.583
Lambay Capital Securit 6.250 GBP 0.082
Debenhams PLC 5.250 7/15/2021 GBP 1.751
Valaris plc 5.750 10/01/2044 USD 10.875
Abengoa Abenewco 2 Bis 1.500 4/26/2024 EUR 0.982
Senvion Holding GmbH 3.875 10/25/2022 EUR 0.782
ADLER Real Estate AG 2.500 7/19/2021 EUR 13.937
Swissport Investments 6.750 12/15/2021 EUR 0.942
Intelsat Jackson Holdi 8.500 10/15/2024 USD 62.938
Norddeutsche Landesban 7.780 EUR 65.547
Galapagos Holding SA 7.000 6/15/2022 EUR 7.498
Linas Matkasse Newco A 8.000 10/09/2022 SEK 55.750
Nostrum Oil & Gas Fina 7.000 2/16/2025 USD 20.759
Air Berlin PLC 8.250 4/19/2018 EUR 0.895
EOS Imaging SA 6.000 5/31/2023 EUR 6.765
Rallye SA 4.000 11/23/2020 CHF 28.200
Intelsat Jackson Holdi 9.750 7/15/2025 USD 63.438
Swissport Investments 9.750 12/15/2022 EUR 45.679
Hellenic Republic Gove 2.085 7/25/2057 EUR 50.375
Offshore Drilling Hold 8.375 9/20/2020 USD 9.624
Privatbank CJSC Via UK 10.250 1/23/2018 USD 30.002
Rallye SA 3.400 1/31/2022 EUR 28.961
Dexia Credit Local SA 1.187 EUR 3.143
Yell Bondco PLC 8.500 05/02/2023 GBP 40.054
EA Partners II BV 6.750 06/01/2021 USD 44.000
Valaris plc 4.875 06/01/2022 USD 7.027
Air Berlin PLC 6.750 05/09/2019 EUR 0.259
Hema Bondco II BV 8.500 1/15/2023 EUR 0.122
Virgolino de Oliveira 10.500 1/28/2018 USD 0.949
Avangardco Investments 10.000 10/29/2018 USD 1.500
Bank Otkritie Financia 10.000 4/26/2019 USD 9.539
UkrLandFarming PLC 10.875 3/26/2018 USD 2.886
Valaris plc 8.000 1/31/2024 USD 11.000
Mitsubishi UFJ Investo 3.700 12/30/2099 EUR 5.969
Santhera Pharmaceutica 5.000 2/17/2022 CHF 39.609
Intelsat Connect Finan 9.500 2/15/2023 USD 36.000
Stichting Afwikkeling 6.250 10/26/2020 EUR 5.365
Eramet SA 4.000 EUR 63.346
Stobart Finance PLC 2.750 05/08/2024 GBP 65.000
Valaris plc 4.500 10/01/2024 USD 3.980
EA Partners I BV 6.875 9/28/2020 USD 0.774
Valaris plc 4.700 3/15/2021 USD 11.000
HI Bidco AS 8.480 1/30/2023 NOK 69.087
BAT International Fina 2.250 09/09/2052 GBP 74.157
Societe Centrale des B 2.500 5/15/2023 EUR 6.880
FF Group Finance Luxem 3.250 11/02/2021 CHF 9.769
FF Group Finance Luxem 1.750 07/03/2019 EUR 5.304
Claranova SADIR 5.000 07/01/2023 EUR 1.110
Deutsche Bank AG 2.652 6/28/2033 USD 70.530
Vseukrainsky Aktsinern 10.900 6/14/2019 USD 1.056
Intelsat Luxembourg SA 7.750 06/01/2021 USD 5.000
WD Invest Sarl 1.900 10/02/2024 EUR 8.375
Catena Media PLC 7.984 SEK 64.164
Banco Espirito Santo S 7.125 11/28/2023 EUR 0.096
Rickmers Holding AG 8.875 06/11/2018 EUR 0.766
Mallinckrodt Internati 5.750 08/01/2022 USD 65.250
Lehman Brothers UK Cap 5.125 EUR 7.919
Thomas Cook Finance 2 3.875 7/15/2023 EUR 1.024
Joh Friedrich Behrens 6.250 6/18/2024 EUR 43.028
Stichting Afwikkeling 11.250 EUR 1.210
DOF Subsea AS 9.500 3/14/2022 USD 25.172
OGX Austria GmbH 8.375 04/01/2022 USD 0.001
Andrade Gutierrez Inte 9.500 12/30/2024 USD 53.484
CNP Assurances 2.000 EUR 50.005
Joh Friedrich Behrens 7.750 11/11/2020 EUR 44.160
Privatbank CJSC Via UK 11.000 02/09/2021 USD 9.042
Grupo Isolux Corsan SA 1.000 12/30/2021 EUR 0.267
New World Resources NV 4.000 10/07/2020 EUR 0.912
Havila Shipping ASA 4.880 01/02/2025 NOK 24.631
Rallye SA 1.000 10/02/2020 EUR 27.304
Hamon & CIE SA 3.300 1/30/2025 EUR 44.750
Mallinckrodt Internati 5.500 4/15/2025 USD 74.867
Lehman Brothers UK Cap 3.875 EUR 7.398
OGX Austria GmbH 8.500 06/01/2018 USD 0.001
DOF Subsea AS 8.450 11/27/2023 NOK 25.196
Alno AG 8.500 5/14/2018 EUR 14.770
Bourbon Corp 7.989 EUR 0.273
KTG Agrar SE 7.125 06/06/2017 EUR 2.932
Hellenic Bank PCL 10.000 EUR 46.066
Dexia SA 1.232 EUR 1.351
Agrokor dd 9.875 05/01/2019 EUR 15.000
German Pellets GmbH 7.250 11/27/2019 EUR 0.588
Lehman Brothers UK Cap 6.900 USD 2.745
Mallinckrodt Internati 5.625 10/15/2023 USD 74.940
Espirito Santo Financi 6.875 10/21/2019 EUR 0.301
Valaris plc 7.375 6/15/2025 USD 13.750
Alpine Holding GmbH 6.000 5/22/2017 EUR 1.007
Gamalife - Cia de Segu 2.957 EUR 69.997
JZ Capital Partners Lt 6.000 7/30/2021 GBP 9.050
Yuksel Insaat AS 9.500 11/10/2015 USD 2.495
CBo Territoria 3.750 07/01/2024 EUR 4.700
Alitalia-Societa Aerea 5.250 7/30/2020 EUR 1.699
Virgolino de Oliveira 11.750 02/09/2022 USD 1.545
Cirio Finanziaria SpA 8.000 12/21/2005 EUR 1.375
Senivita Social Estate 2.000 05/12/2025 EUR 9.700
Verimatrix SA 6.000 6/29/2022 EUR 3.951
Cirio Holding Luxembou 6.250 2/16/2004 EUR 0.620
Allied Irish Banks PLC 12.500 6/25/2035 GBP 60.614
Autonomous Community o 2.965 09/08/2039 JPY 71.910
Norske Skog Holding AS 8.000 2/24/2021 EUR 0.006
Immigon Portfolioabbau 5.795 EUR 12.466
Privatbank CJSC Via UK 10.875 2/28/2018 USD 29.749
Abengoa Abenewco 2 Bis 1.500 4/26/2024 USD 0.903
Pongs & Zahn AG 8.500 11/01/2014 EUR 0.002
Banca Popolare di Vice 2.821 12/20/2017 EUR 0.150
Tresu Investment Holdi 5.000 9/29/2022 EUR 28.255
Valaris plc 5.850 1/15/2044 USD 14.000
Valaris plc 5.400 12/01/2042 USD 12.337
Norske Skogindustrier 7.000 12/30/2026 EUR 0.001
Norwegian Air Shuttle 6.375 11/15/2024 USD 50.750
Bilt Paper BV 9.640 USD 1.000
Finmek International S 7.000 12/03/2004 EUR 2.193
Valaris plc 4.750 1/15/2024 USD 14.000
Banca Popolare di Vice 9.500 9/29/2025 EUR 0.049
Banco Espirito Santo S 2.106 EUR 0.100
EDOB Abwicklungs AG 7.500 04/01/2012 EUR 2.351
Lehman Brothers UK Cap 5.750 EUR 2.225
Virgolino de Oliveira 10.500 1/28/2018 USD 0.949
Manchester Building So 6.750 GBP 30.051
International Industri 9.000 07/06/2011 EUR 0.254
Veneto Banca SpA 9.878 12/01/2025 EUR 0.407
Portugal Telecom Inter 6.250 7/26/2016 EUR 0.175
KCA Deutag UK Finance 9.875 04/01/2022 USD 48.430
Air Berlin PLC 5.625 05/09/2019 CHF 0.513
International Industri 11.000 2/19/2013 USD 0.280
Nostrum Oil & Gas Fina 8.000 7/25/2022 USD 23.299
KCA Deutag UK Finance 9.625 04/01/2023 USD 49.709
Russian Federal Bond - 0.250 7/20/2044 RUB 19.000
Ghelamco Invest 4.500 5/23/2022 EUR 40.000
KPNQwest NV 7.125 06/01/2009 EUR 0.068
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 4.740 6/29/2022 USD 9.900
Kaupthing ehf 7.625 2/28/2015 USD 0.250
Autostrade per l'Itali 2.730 12/10/2038 JPY 28.682
Phones4u Finance PLC 9.500 04/01/2018 GBP 71.750
New World Resources NV 8.000 04/07/2020 EUR 0.036
Praktiker AG 5.875 02/10/2016 EUR 0.069
Kommunekredit 0.500 7/30/2027 TRY 32.432
Cooperatieve Rabobank 0.500 10/30/2043 MXN 14.404
Civitas Properties Fin 4.000 11/24/2022 EUR 47.000
Hellas Telecommunicati 6.054 1/15/2015 USD 0.001
Cooperatieve Rabobank 0.500 10/29/2027 MXN 62.920
Grupo Isolux Corsan SA 6.000 12/30/2021 EUR 0.732
Virgolino de Oliveira 10.875 1/13/2020 USD 32.000
Corporate Commercial B 8.250 08/08/2014 USD 0.308
SpareBank 1 SR-Bank AS 1.207 12/21/2030 EUR 73.990
Cooperatieve Rabobank 0.500 7/30/2043 MXN 14.493
Cooperatieve Rabobank 0.500 1/31/2033 MXN 37.498
ESFIL-Espirito Santo F 5.250 06/12/2015 EUR 1.311
Elli Investments Ltd 12.250 6/15/2020 GBP 52.265
Island Offshore Shipho 2.790 6/30/2021 NOK 2.651
Cirio Finance Luxembou 7.500 11/03/2002 EUR 2.545
Banco Espirito Santo S 6.875 7/15/2016 EUR 20.375
Steilmann SE 6.750 6/27/2017 EUR 2.184
Centrosolar Group AG 7.000 2/15/2016 EUR 2.505
Kaupthing ehf 5.750 10/04/2011 USD 0.250
Offshore Drilling Hold 8.375 9/20/2020 USD 9.624
CRC Breeze Finance SA 6.110 05/08/2026 EUR 30.272
O1 Properties Finance 8.250 9/27/2021 USD 13.569
Waste Italia SpA 10.500 11/15/2019 EUR 0.500
Cirio Del Monte NV 7.750 3/14/2005 EUR 0.510
Del Monte Finance Luxe 6.625 5/24/2006 EUR 4.426
Agrokor dd 9.125 02/01/2020 EUR 15.000
Alno AG 8.000 3/21/2019 EUR 15.250
OGX Austria GmbH 8.375 04/01/2022 USD 0.001
KPNQwest NV 8.875 02/01/2008 EUR 0.068
Norske Skogindustrier 2.000 12/30/2115 EUR 0.113
Bank Nadra Via NDR Fin 8.250 7/31/2018 USD 0.208
MaxFastigheter i Sveri 6.500 SEK 50.104
ML 33 Invest AS 7.500 NOK 61.704
Tennor Finance BV 5.750 6/17/2024 EUR 75.000
Sairgroup Finance BV 4.375 06/08/2006 EUR 0.233
Espirito Santo Financi 3.125 12/02/2018 EUR 1.752
LBI ehf 6.100 8/25/2011 USD 9.904
KCA Deutag UK Finance 7.250 5/15/2021 USD 48.500
Caixa Economica Montep 5.000 EUR 50.000
Banco Espirito Santo S 6.900 6/28/2024 EUR 20.375
UBS AG/London 14.000 07/06/2021 USD 69.760
Breeze Finance SA 6.708 4/19/2027 EUR 28.950
BNG Bank NV 10.010 6/17/2025 TRY 69.465
Intelsat Jackson Holdi 9.750 7/15/2025 USD 73.250
Veneto Banca SpA 6.411 EUR 0.761
Intelsat Jackson Holdi 8.500 10/15/2024 USD 62.375
Pongs & Zahn AG 8.500 EUR 0.002
Steilmann SE 7.000 03/09/2017 EUR 1.429
Grenke Finance PLC 0.819 2/15/2030 EUR 63.553
Chr Bygga Bostader Hol 9.000 07/05/2021 SEK 50.000
Stichting Afwikkeling 6.625 5/14/2018 EUR 5.375
Solstad Offshore ASA 3.900 9/24/2021 NOK 4.666
Bulgaria Steel Finance 12.000 05/04/2013 EUR 0.216
Hellas Telecommunicati 8.500 10/15/2013 EUR 0.540
Windreich GmbH 6.500 7/15/2016 EUR 4.315
Rena GmbH 7.000 12/15/2015 EUR 2.096
Alpine Holding GmbH 5.250 07/01/2015 EUR 1.007
REM Saltire AS 7.200 6/30/2021 NOK 51.679
Manchester Building So 8.000 GBP 34.667
KTG Agrar SE 7.250 10/15/2019 EUR 2.932
KPNQwest NV 10.000 3/15/2012 EUR 0.068
Abengoa Abenewco 2 Bis 1.500 4/26/2024 USD 1.315
AKB Peresvet ZAO 0.510 08/04/2034 RUB 36.860
Decipher Production Lt 12.500 9/27/2019 USD 1.500
Sairgroup Finance BV 6.625 10/06/2010 EUR 0.233
Agrokor dd 8.875 02/01/2020 USD 15.000
Saleza AS 9.000 07/12/2021 EUR 0.203
Naviera Armas SA 4.250 11/15/2024 EUR 60.805
Turkey Government Bond 11.700 11/13/2030 TRY 73.250
Phosphorus Holdco PLC 10.000 04/01/2019 GBP 0.613
Finance and Credit Ban 9.250 1/25/2019 USD 0.257
Mox Telecom AG 7.250 11/02/2017 EUR 1.354
SiC Processing GmbH 7.125 03/01/2016 EUR 2.614
Alpine Holding GmbH 5.250 06/10/2016 EUR 1.007
Depfa Funding III LP 0.040 EUR 37.034
Veneto Banca SpA 6.950 2/25/2025 EUR 0.407
Officine Maccaferri-Sp 5.750 06/01/2021 EUR 35.515
Erotik-Abwicklungsgese 7.750 07/09/2019 EUR 0.779
La Veggia Finance SA 7.125 11/14/2004 EUR 0.287
WPE International Coop 10.375 9/30/2020 USD 4.922
Senvion Holding GmbH 3.875 10/25/2022 EUR 0.782
OGX Austria GmbH 8.500 06/01/2018 USD 0.001
Cattles Ltd 8.125 07/05/2017 GBP 0.027
Hema Bondco II BV 8.500 1/15/2023 EUR 0.122
Aralco Finance SA 10.125 05/07/2020 USD 0.934
KCA Deutag UK Finance 9.875 04/01/2022 USD 48.083
German Pellets GmbH 7.250 07/09/2018 EUR 0.588
Banco Espirito Santo S 2.286 EUR 0.235
Windreich GmbH 6.500 03/01/2015 EUR 4.315
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 20.000 11/29/2024 USD 11.890
Dr Wiesent Sozial gGmb 7.000 EUR 0.020
Deutsche Bank AG 0.687 10/11/2049 EUR 72.814
Yell Bondco PLC 8.500 05/02/2023 GBP 40.309
Turkiye Ihracat Kredi 12.540 9/14/2028 TRY 72.225
KCA Deutag UK Finance 7.250 5/15/2021 USD 48.417
SFO Akkord Finans 10.000 02/12/2024 RUB 61.540
Barclays Bank PLC 0.350 05/06/2022 USD 9.865
Banco Santander SA 1.860 EUR 2.117
Deutsche Bank AG/Londo 13.750 6/20/2026 TRY 66.765
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.220 03/01/2024 EUR 0.100
SAS AB 4.407 SEK 37.652
Espirito Santo Financi 9.750 12/19/2025 EUR 1.134
Agrokor dd 9.875 05/01/2019 EUR 15.000
KCA Deutag UK Finance 9.625 04/01/2023 USD 49.709
Portugal Telecom Inter 5.242 11/06/2017 EUR 0.694
MS Deutschland Beteili 6.875 12/18/2017 EUR 1.920
BOA Offshore AS 0.409 7/17/2047 NOK 7.396
Sidetur Finance BV 10.000 4/20/2016 USD 2.749
Gold-Zack AG 7.000 12/14/2005 EUR 11.030
Intelsat Connect Finan 9.500 2/15/2023 USD 28.000
Virgolino de Oliveira 10.875 1/13/2020 USD 32.000
Rena GmbH 8.250 07/11/2018 EUR 2.096
German Pellets GmbH 7.250 04/01/2016 EUR 0.588
AKB Peresvet ZAO 0.510 2/14/2032 RUB 11.000
Swissport Investments 9.750 12/15/2022 EUR 45.679
Uppfinnaren 1 AB 11.000 SEK 40.000
International Finance 0.500 6/29/2027 ZAR 63.210
Russian Post FGUP 2.750 12/06/2023 RUB 70.000
Intralot Capital Luxem 5.250 9/15/2024 EUR 56.034
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 5.000 3/29/2023 USD 9.610
Promsvyazbank PJSC 2.500 9/29/2029 RUB 67.120
Havila Shipping ASA 4.130 01/02/2025 NOK 49.964
Ideal Standard Interna 11.750 05/01/2018 EUR 0.050
Paper Industries Inter 6.000 03/01/2025 EUR 70.000
Credit Agricole Corpor 5.400 1/31/2028 BRL 73.571
Stichting Afwikkeling 2.207 EUR 1.210
Stichting Afwikkeling 8.450 8/20/2018 USD 5.375
Air Berlin Finance BV 8.500 03/06/2019 EUR 0.510
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 4/29/2024 PLN 50.146
Ahtium PLC 4.000 12/16/2015 EUR 0.586
SAir Group 6.250 10/27/2002 CHF 12.625
Vneshprombank Ltd Via 9.000 11/14/2016 USD 0.078
AKB Peresvet ZAO 0.510 6/23/2021 RUB 53.590
Top Gun Realisations 7 8.000 07/01/2023 GBP 1.476
Nostrum Oil & Gas Fina 7.000 2/16/2025 USD 23.482
Ahtium PLC 9.750 04/04/2017 EUR 0.768
NTRP Via Interpipe Ltd 10.250 08/02/2017 USD 30.500
Rio Forte Investments 4.750 11/10/2015 EUR 5.720
UniCredit Bank AG 10.300 12/24/2021 EUR 68.030
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 0.490 03/11/2031 EUR 43.346
getgoods.de AG 7.750 10/02/2017 EUR 0.291
Golfino AG 8.000 11/18/2023 EUR 0.010
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 6.000 06/02/2021 EUR 57.110
Depfa Funding II LP 6.500 EUR 60.474
Norske Skogindustrier 7.125 10/15/2033 USD 0.001
Rio Forte Investments 4.000 7/22/2014 EUR 5.859
Moby SpA 7.750 2/15/2023 EUR 23.557
A-TEC Industries AG 8.750 10/27/2014 EUR 0.100
SAir Group 4.250 02/02/2007 CHF 12.625
Deutsche Agrar Holding 7.250 9/28/2018 EUR 1.254
Commerzbank AG 0.085 11/19/2029 EUR 64.718
Solship Invest 1 AS 5.000 12/08/2024 NOK 6.682
Societe Generale SA 8.000 8/18/2021 USD 34.060
Steilmann SE 7.000 9/23/2018 EUR 1.429
Rio Forte Investments 3.900 07/10/2014 USD 5.394
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 6.500 3/28/2022 USD 4.420
City of Predeal Romani 2.500 5/15/2026 RON 61.000
Barclays Bank PLC 2.000 06/12/2029 TRY 31.926
Air Berlin Finance BV 6.000 03/06/2019 EUR 0.315
HSBC Bank PLC 0.500 6/23/2027 MXN 65.005
Espirito Santo Financi 5.050 11/15/2025 EUR 1.230
Deutsche Bank AG/Londo 0.500 10/18/2038 MXN 15.015
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 12.250 02/08/2024 USD 9.750
Gebr Sanders GmbH & Co 8.750 10/22/2018 EUR 9.492
Dolphin Drilling ASA 4.490 8/28/2019 NOK 0.644
Sequa Petroleum NV 5.000 4/29/2020 USD 28.764
Veneto Banca SpA 6.944 5/15/2025 EUR 0.407
Kingdom of Belgium 0.459 7/23/2079 EUR 71.829
Lloyds Bank PLC 0.500 7/26/2028 MXN 59.466
SAir Group 6.250 04/12/2005 CHF 12.625
Barclays Bank PLC 0.500 4/13/2022 USD
Norske Skogindustrier 7.125 10/15/2033 USD 0.001
Pescanova SA 5.125 4/20/2017 EUR 0.319
Pescanova SA 8.750 2/17/2019 EUR 0.319
UBS AG/London 10.250 4/19/2021 EUR 73.950
BNP Paribas Issuance B 6.550 3/28/2025 EUR 64.350
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 6.250 10/31/2025 USD 11.501
Activa Resources AG 0.500 11/15/2021 EUR 1.000
SAir Group 5.500 7/23/2003 CHF 12.625
BLT Finance BV 12.000 02/10/2015 USD 10.500
Galapagos Holding SA 7.000 6/15/2022 EUR 7.498
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.000 10/05/2035 EUR 0.100
Barclays Bank PLC 5.000 11/01/2029 BRL 65.893
Muehl Product & Servic 6.750 03/10/2005 DEM 0.080
Virgolino de Oliveira 11.750 02/09/2022 USD 1.545
Solon SE 1.375 12/06/2012 EUR 0.544
Societe Generale SA 6.000 05/09/2022 USD 13.950
Leonteq Securities AG/ 5.880 6/16/2021 EUR 16.600
SG Issuer SA 5.000 5/23/2024 EUR 61.930
Golden Gate AG 6.500 10/11/2014 EUR 37.600
Thomas Cook Finance 2 3.875 7/15/2023 EUR 1.024
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.188 11/02/2035 EUR 0.100
Otkritie Holding JSC 0.010 10/03/2036 RUB 0.010
Swissport Investments 6.750 12/15/2021 EUR 0.942
Bank Otkritie Financia 0.010 9/24/2025 RUB 71.050
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 4.970 4/29/2022 USD 9.900
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 11.000 7/22/2021 CHF 67.350
Banco Espirito Santo S 10.000 12/06/2021 EUR 0.098
AKB Peresvet ZAO 13.000 10/07/2017 RUB 46.500
Danske Bank A/S 5.300 7/15/2023 SEK 45.850
Societe Generale SA 22.000 11/03/2022 USD 58.400
COFIDUR SA 0.100 12/31/2024 EUR 24.050
Bibby Offshore Service 7.500 6/15/2021 GBP 11.500
Intelsat Jackson Holdi 9.750 7/15/2025 USD 73.250
Credit Agricole Corpor 10.320 7/22/2026 TRY 70.737
BRAbank ASA 7.440 NOK 57.933
ECM Real Estate Invest 5.000 10/09/2011 EUR 15.375
UniCredit Bank AG 0.115 11/19/2029 EUR 71.236
SG Issuer SA 0.263 2/20/2025 EUR 19.940
Leonteq Securities AG/ 6.400 11/03/2021 CHF 51.020
Societe Generale SA 12.560 09/08/2023 USD
Cooperativa Muratori & 6.875 08/01/2022 EUR 2.596
Credit Agricole Corpor 10.500 2/16/2027 TRY 71.062
Credito Padano Banca d 3.100 EUR 34.168
New World Resources NV 8.000 04/07/2020 EUR 0.036
SAir Group 2.125 11/04/2004 CHF 12.625
Agrokor dd 8.875 02/01/2020 USD 15.000
Norske Skog Holding AS 8.000 2/24/2023 USD 0.006
Cooperatieve Rabobank 0.500 11/30/2027 MXN 62.901
SALVATOR Vermoegensver 9.500 12/31/2021 EUR 9.250
Leonteq Securities AG 12.500 5/20/2021 CHF 64.860
Tonon Luxembourg SA 9.250 1/24/2020 USD 1.000
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 0.650 10/01/2031 EUR 10.320
Grupo Isolux Corsan SA 0.250 12/30/2018 EUR 0.265
Agrokor dd Via Aquariu 4.921 08/08/2017 EUR 14.625
International Bank of 8.250 10/09/2024 USD 60.375
Windreich GmbH 6.750 03/01/2015 EUR 4.315
Instabank ASA 5.380 3/28/2028 NOK 71.087
Minicentrales Dos SA 0.010 06/06/2047 EUR 67.347
Societe Generale SA 12.000 07/08/2021 USD
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 6.000 8/27/2021 EUR 55.880
Leonteq Securities AG/ 3.350 12/13/2021 EUR 68.630
Santander Consumer Ban 5.280 NOK 61.002
Barclays Bank PLC 1.450 9/24/2038 MXN 31.388
Astana Finance BV 7.875 06/08/2010 EUR 16.000
SG Issuer SA 4.000 7/20/2021 SEK 71.000
Societe Generale SA 6.000 06/06/2022 USD 14.700
BNP Paribas Emissions- 10.000 6/24/2021 EUR 60.000
Phones4u Finance PLC 9.500 04/01/2018 GBP 71.750
Thomas Cook Group PLC 6.250 6/15/2022 EUR 0.836
BNP Paribas SA 1.000 1/23/2040 MXN 19.850
Tonon Luxembourg SA 12.500 5/14/2024 USD 0.399
Espirito Santo Financi 0.352 10/27/2024 EUR 0.300
A-TEC Industries AG 5.750 11/02/2010 EUR 0.100
Instabank ASA 7.380 NOK 48.428
A-TEC Industries AG 2.750 05/10/2014 EUR 0.100
KPNQwest NV 7.125 06/01/2009 EUR 0.068
UniCredit Bank AG 6.600 7/20/2028 EUR 45.780
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 7.000 10/20/2022 EUR 53.810
Metalloinvest Holding 0.010 03/10/2022 RUB 73.160
UkrLandFarming PLC 10.875 3/26/2018 USD 2.886
Credit Agricole Corpor 10.200 08/06/2026 TRY 70.375
Kaupthing ehf 5.750 10/04/2011 USD 0.250
Credit Agricole Corpor 11.190 1/15/2026 TRY 74.476
SAir Group 0.125 07/07/2005 CHF 12.625
Credit Agricole CIB Fi 0.390 12/16/2032 EUR 61.601
Cooperativa Muratori & 6.000 2/15/2023 EUR 2.880
KPNQwest NV 8.875 02/01/2008 EUR 0.068
Cooperatieve Rabobank 0.500 12/29/2027 MXN 62.277
Skandinaviska Enskilda 9.500 7/17/2023 SEK 75.520
SAir Group 5.125 03/01/2003 CHF 12.500
Barclays Bank PLC 2.730 9/27/2024 EUR 71.810
Resa SA/Belgium 1.950 7/22/2036 EUR 50.000
Archer Finance OOO 9.250 3/29/2022 RUB 0.020
Solarwatt GmbH 7.000 11/01/2015 EUR 15.500
LBI ehf 6.100 8/25/2011 USD 9.904
Northland Resources AB 4.000 10/15/2020 NOK 0.271
AlphaNotes ETP Dac 0.010 09/09/2029 USD 68.996
Bulgaria Steel Finance 12.000 05/04/2013 EUR 0.216
Samaratransneft-Termin 17.000 6/20/2021 RUB 32.000
Societe Generale SA 4.500 12/29/2022 USD 4.190
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 8.750 5/20/2021 GBP 63.250
UniCredit Bank AG 5.050 01/11/2022 EUR 35.870
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 8.000 05/04/2021 EUR 74.560
SAG Solarstrom AG 6.250 12/14/2015 EUR 31.000
Santander Consumer Ban 5.280 NOK 60.483
Kaupthing ehf 4.390 10/14/2008 CZK 0.250
SAir Group 2.750 7/30/2004 CHF 12.625
Otkritie Holding JSC 10.000 4/20/2028 RUB 2.440
Credito Padano Banca d 3.100 EUR 33.959
EDOB Abwicklungs AG 7.500 04/01/2012 EUR 2.351
Mriya Agro Holding PLC 9.450 4/19/2018 USD 4.376
Barclays Bank PLC 0.500 1/28/2033 MXN 35.423
Espirito Santo Financi 5.125 5/30/2016 EUR 1.526
Cooperatieve Rabobank 0.500 8/21/2028 MXN 58.521
HSBC Bank PLC 10.300 12/10/2024 TRY 74.156
Raiffeisen Switzerland 5.500 7/26/2021 EUR 54.580
EFG International Fina 6.130 6/20/2024 EUR 2.990
Skandinaviska Enskilda 8.300 7/17/2023 SEK 73.280
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.400 04/05/2023 EUR 47.360
Nordea Bank Abp 4.100 7/20/2023 SEK 51.500
SG Issuer SA 3.000 09/02/2021 EUR 49.090
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 7.250 4/27/2021 EUR 72.610
Privatbank CJSC Via UK 10.875 2/28/2018 USD 29.749
Tonon Luxembourg SA 12.500 5/14/2024 USD 0.399
Windreich GmbH 6.250 03/01/2015 EUR 4.315
OOO SPV Structural Inv 0.010 09/01/2023 RUB 66.740
Agrokor dd 9.125 02/01/2020 EUR 15.000
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.050 7/23/2021 EUR 68.680
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.000 02/10/2023 EUR 71.830
Raiffeisen Switzerland 4.000 8/30/2022 CHF 55.490
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 10.250 05/03/2021 CHF 68.440
SG Issuer SA 5.000 07/10/2021 EUR
Getin Noble Bank SA 4.750 5/31/2024 PLN 71.874
Getin Noble Bank SA 4.250 6/28/2024 PLN 59.875
Top Gun Realisations 7 8.000 07/01/2023 GBP 1.476
Bilt Paper BV 9.640 USD 1.000
Heta Asset Resolution 7.500 12/31/2023 ATS 1.994
Lehman Brothers Treasu 14.900 9/15/2008 EUR 0.100
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 7/28/2023 PLN 65.059
Kaupthing ehf 9.000 USD 0.122
Pescanova SA 6.750 03/05/2015 EUR 0.319
Societe Generale Effek 3.000 7/22/2022 USD 8.050
SG Issuer SA 2.980 12/28/2021 USD 71.170
Citigroup Global Marke 12.379 11/13/2023 SEK 71.760
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.600 08/12/2021 EUR 58.100
Barclays Bank PLC 0.517 05/06/2022 USD 9.950
SG Issuer SA 1.400 12/28/2032 EUR 26.010
UBS AG/London 25.250 08/10/2021 CHF 68.050
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 10.000 1/20/2023 USD 9.780
Bank Julius Baer & Co 10.600 7/22/2021 USD 58.650
Kardan NV 6.325 2/21/2021 ILS 13.860
Bank Julius Baer & Co 9.500 05/07/2021 EUR 70.750
WEB Windenergie AG 4.000 12/17/2025 EUR 0.010
Metalloinvest Holding 0.010 03/07/2022 RUB 70.010
Rosbank PJSC 0.010 4/30/2024 RUB 65.000
Aralco Finance SA 10.125 05/07/2020 USD 0.934
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.000 3/16/2035 EUR 0.100
Mriya Agro Holding PLC 9.450 4/19/2018 USD 4.376
Minicentrales Dos SA 0.010 06/06/2047 EUR 65.750
Kaupthing ehf 1.588 ISK 0.250
Ideal Standard Interna 11.750 05/01/2018 EUR 0.050
Espirito Santo Financi 5.050 11/15/2025 EUR 0.852
Credit Agricole Corpor 9.450 03/08/2027 TRY 66.519
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.650 8/24/2011 AUD 0.100
Credit Agricole CIB Fi 7.000 06/12/2023 TRY 75.665
Kaupthing ehf 6.125 10/04/2016 USD 0.250
EYEMAXX Real Estate AG 5.500 9/24/2024 EUR 69.379
Eiendomskreditt AS 2.270 9/17/2029 NOK 71.603
Bank Otkritie Financia 10.000 4/26/2019 USD 9.539
PA Resources AB 13.500 03/03/2016 SEK 0.124
New World Resources NV 4.000 10/07/2020 EUR 0.912
Phosphorus Holdco PLC 10.000 04/01/2019 GBP 0.613
LBI ehf 7.431 USD 0.001
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 0.500 01/08/2026 BRL 63.445
KPNQwest NV 8.125 06/01/2009 USD 0.068
Credit Agricole Corpor 10.200 12/13/2027 TRY 67.955
Norske Skog Holding AS 8.000 2/24/2023 USD 0.006
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.500 6/22/2010 USD 0.100
HSBC Bank PLC 10.300 12/20/2024 TRY 74.117
LBI ehf 8.650 05/01/2011 ISK 9.375
Credit Agricole Corpor 10.800 3/24/2026 TRY 70.162
Heta Asset Resolution 5.730 12/31/2023 EUR 1.994
Heta Asset Resolution 5.920 12/31/2023 EUR 1.994
Cerruti Finance SA 6.500 7/26/2004 EUR 2.061
Norske Skogindustrier 7.000 12/30/2026 EUR 0.001
UniCredit Bank AG 5.500 07/09/2021 EUR 47.670
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.000 11/19/2021 EUR 67.930
Societe Generale SA 4.890 2/16/2023 USD
Leonteq Securities AG/ 2.630 7/30/2021 USD 71.290
TransKomplektHolding O 9.500 11/02/2028 RUB 70.000
SG Issuer SA 5.000 04/02/2024 EUR 58.550
Skandinaviska Enskilda 8.600 7/17/2023 SEK 73.840
Skandinaviska Enskilda 4.400 7/15/2022 SEK 71.045
RENE LEZARD Mode GmbH 7.250 11/25/2017 EUR 1.000
BNP Paribas Issuance B 5.000 11/05/2024 EUR 27.710
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 10.200 08/06/2021 CHF 73.680
SALVATOR Vermoegensver 9.500 EUR 10.800
Derzhava-Garant OOO 7.500 06/12/2030 RUB 0.990
State of Saxony-Anhalt 0.030 07/03/2028 EUR 60.000
Tonon Luxembourg SA 9.250 1/24/2020 USD 1.000
AKB Peresvet ZAO 13.250 4/25/2018 RUB 46.500
Irish Bank Resolution 4.000 4/23/2018 EUR 33.250
Getin Noble Bank SA 4.250 8/30/2024 PLN 68.371
Intelsat SA 4.500 6/15/2025 USD 35.152
Kaupthing ehf 3.750 02/01/2045 USD 0.232
Nota-Bank OJSC 13.500 04/01/2016 RUB 31.500
SAG Solarstrom AG 7.500 07/10/2017 EUR 31.000
Astana Finance BV 9.000 11/16/2011 USD 15.250
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.050 9/16/2008 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.375 9/20/2008 EUR 0.100
Hellas Telecommunicati 6.054 1/15/2015 USD 0.001
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.000 10/23/2008 USD 0.100
Credit Agricole Corpor 10.800 3/24/2026 TRY 72.926
Lehman Brothers Treasu 23.300 9/16/2008 USD 0.100
Heta Asset Resolution 0.131 12/31/2023 EUR 1.994
UBS AG/London 13.750 7/26/2021 USD 70.810
Credit Suisse AG/Nassa 7.000 6/22/2021 CHF 55.930
Danske Bank A/S 10.300 07/09/2023 SEK 11.000
Vontobel Financial Pro 5.000 4/13/2021 EUR 58.463
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.000 9/21/2023 EUR 72.020
Corner Banca SA 12.200 4/27/2021 CHF 73.560
UBS AG/London 13.500 4/26/2021 USD 66.950
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 8.750 6/23/2021 EUR 70.940
Santander Consumer Ban 5.280 NOK 60.483
Turkey Government Bond 10.500 08/11/2027 TRY 73.000
IT Holding Finance SA 9.875 11/15/2012 EUR 0.255
Petromena ASA 9.750 5/24/2016 NOK 0.607
HSBC Bank PLC 0.500 11/25/2025 BRL 64.266
Heta Asset Resolution 4.350 12/31/2023 EUR 1.994
Northland Resources AB 4.000 10/15/2020 USD 0.271
Banca Popolare di Vice 9.500 10/02/2025 EUR 0.049
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.875 3/14/2013 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.350 08/08/2016 SGD 0.100
Nutritek International 8.750 12/11/2008 USD 2.089
MIK OAO 15.000 2/19/2020 RUB 13.875
Deutsche Bank AG/Londo 0.500 04/05/2038 MXN 23.347
BNP Paribas SA 0.500 11/16/2032 MXN 27.540
Kaupthing ehf 7.000 7/24/2009 ISK 0.250
Raiffeisen Switzerland 6.800 05/06/2022 EUR 0.020
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 07/07/2021 EUR 49.480
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.000 6/21/2021 EUR 45.840
Societe Generale SA 3.900 3/23/2022 USD 0.890
UBS AG/London 10.000 8/19/2021 CHF 70.750
UniCredit Bank AG 13.000 6/25/2021 EUR 73.650
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 8.000 2/25/2022 CHF 72.140
Leonteq Securities AG 5.000 6/15/2021 CHF 69.600
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 8.500 5/18/2021 EUR 62.250
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 9.250 8/26/2021 CHF 67.900
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.350 5/19/2021 EUR 76.700
UBS AG/London 7.000 2/21/2022 EUR 63.800
UBS AG/London 5.500 8/19/2021 EUR 67.300
UBS AG/London 5.750 8/20/2021 EUR 69.800
Societe Generale Effek 29.303 6/25/2021 EUR 66.510
Leonteq Securities AG/ 8.600 07/12/2021 EUR 62.470
UBS AG/London 6.500 8/19/2021 CHF 67.300
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.150 6/14/2022 EUR 69.590
BNP Paribas Emissions- 8.500 6/24/2021 EUR 71.740
BNP Paribas Emissions- 9.500 6/24/2021 EUR 71.930
BNP Paribas Emissions- 13.000 6/24/2021 EUR 64.380
BNP Paribas Emissions- 9.000 6/24/2021 EUR 66.980
BNP Paribas Emissions- 7.500 6/24/2021 EUR 73.450
BNP Paribas Emissions- 9.000 6/24/2021 EUR 70.920
BNP Paribas Emissions- 10.000 6/24/2021 EUR 69.610
BNP Paribas Emissions- 12.000 6/24/2021 EUR 72.780
BNP Paribas Emissions- 10.000 6/24/2021 EUR 71.110
BNP Paribas Emissions- 11.000 6/24/2021 EUR 68.680
BNP Paribas Emissions- 12.000 6/24/2021 EUR 67.230
Vontobel Financial Pro 14.500 6/25/2021 EUR 75.250
Vontobel Financial Pro 18.000 6/25/2021 EUR 73.450
Corner Banca SA 15.400 06/02/2021 CHF 71.670
Vontobel Financial Pro 16.000 6/25/2021 EUR 73.910
Vontobel Financial Pro 17.000 6/25/2021 EUR 72.540
Vontobel Financial Pro 19.500 6/25/2021 EUR 72.140
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 7.000 7/26/2021 AUD 68.170
BNP Paribas Emissions- 10.000 6/24/2021 EUR 70.430
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.400 09/04/2023 EUR 75.990
BNP Paribas Emissions- 9.500 6/24/2021 EUR 71.580
Leonteq Securities AG/ 10.600 7/26/2021 USD 72.270
UBS AG/London 7.500 09/06/2021 CHF 72.400
Leonteq Securities AG 22.300 6/15/2021 EUR 6.240
Leonteq Securities AG 21.800 6/25/2021 CHF 5.680
Leonteq Securities AG/ 4.000 03/03/2022 EUR 34.260
Vontobel Financial Pro 11.000 6/25/2021 EUR 68.179
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.700 2/25/2022 EUR 71.730
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 1.200 2/25/2022 EUR 70.000
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.700 2/25/2022 EUR 62.780
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.800 6/25/2021 EUR 64.880
Citigroup Global Marke 8.050 1/24/2023 EUR 63.570
Erste Group Bank AG 4.350 2/20/2022 EUR 55.450
SG Issuer SA 7.600 1/20/2025 SEK 66.370
UniCredit Bank AG 4.200 2/19/2022 EUR 51.920
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.000 8/27/2021 EUR 59.130
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.500 03/09/2022 EUR 57.480
UniCredit Bank AG 4.000 3/13/2022 EUR 55.600
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.900 03/09/2023 EUR 66.460
EFG International Fina 7.000 2/21/2022 CHF 73.400
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.400 03/09/2023 EUR 63.150
Leonteq Securities AG 6.400 5/25/2021 CHF 58.550
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.500 07/06/2022 EUR 46.490
Leonteq Securities AG 8.000 06/08/2021 CHF 65.000
UniCredit Bank AG 3.700 6/25/2022 EUR 60.460
UniCredit Bank AG 6.000 12/25/2021 EUR 76.670
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 2.000 6/13/2022 EUR 61.510
UBS AG/London 10.000 8/26/2021 EUR 70.450
Bank Julius Baer & Co 9.500 8/26/2021 CHF 69.050
UBS AG/London 10.750 8/26/2021 CHF 73.800
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 4.300 6/21/2021 EUR 71.510
UBS AG/London 7.000 7/26/2021 EUR 55.400
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 6.000 8/24/2022 CHF 74.970
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 7.500 5/25/2021 CHF 68.480
UBS AG/London 10.250 8/26/2021 CHF 73.800
EFG International Fina 10.000 7/26/2021 EUR 64.480
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 2.300 02/09/2023 EUR 74.110
UniCredit Bank AG 4.130 2/13/2022 EUR 58.260
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.500 2/16/2023 EUR 53.850
Societe Generale SA 4.500 12/30/2024 USD 65.180
Societe Generale SA 4.500 12/29/2022 USD 6.100
EFG International Fina 11.500 08/02/2021 USD 60.330
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 5.750 9/22/2021 EUR 74.180
Societe Generale SA 22.000 8/31/2022 USD 73.800
Corner Banca SA 15.000 05/04/2021 CHF 3.580
BNP Paribas Emissions- 8.000 6/24/2021 EUR 73.230
EFG International Fina 14.800 8/19/2021 CHF 67.980
Vontobel Financial Pro 16.500 6/25/2021 EUR 58.334
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.200 7/23/2021 EUR 69.190
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.000 03/10/2023 EUR 63.670
UniCredit Bank AG 6.000 6/25/2021 EUR 67.570
UniCredit Bank AG 5.400 12/24/2021 EUR 69.230
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 7/23/2021 EUR 66.130
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 5.600 07/12/2021 CHF 45.000
UniCredit Bank AG 7.500 12/24/2021 EUR 53.790
UniCredit Bank AG 10.200 12/24/2021 EUR 70.090
UniCredit Bank AG 4.700 6/25/2021 EUR 72.810
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.300 7/23/2021 EUR 67.900
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 6/16/2022 EUR 55.680
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.300 9/23/2022 EUR 45.300
Societe Generale SA 8.000 5/28/2027 USD 44.400
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 3.300 6/21/2021 EUR 73.810
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 5.000 12/29/2021 CHF 66.720
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 6/25/2021 EUR 65.260
UniCredit Bank AG 6.600 12/24/2021 EUR 56.110
UniCredit Bank AG 10.000 6/25/2021 EUR 74.470
UniCredit Bank AG 7.500 6/25/2021 EUR 63.170
Skandinaviska Enskilda 9.020 7/17/2023 SEK 72.110
Corner Banca SA 14.200 8/24/2021 USD 6.610
UniCredit Bank AG 9.100 12/24/2021 EUR 72.640
UniCredit Bank AG 4.100 12/24/2021 EUR 65.500
UniCredit Bank AG 7.600 6/25/2021 EUR 53.280
UniCredit Bank AG 4.400 12/24/2021 EUR 73.430
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.700 10/13/2023 EUR 67.750
UniCredit Bank AG 8.700 6/25/2021 EUR 74.550
UniCredit Bank AG 10.700 6/25/2021 EUR 71.250
UniCredit Bank AG 12.100 6/25/2021 EUR 67.600
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 5.000 7/23/2021 EUR 69.980
UniCredit Bank AG 4.400 6/25/2021 EUR 64.550
UniCredit Bank AG 5.400 6/25/2021 EUR 60.220
UniCredit Bank AG 8.900 12/24/2021 EUR 60.090
UniCredit Bank AG 10.100 6/25/2021 EUR 48.040
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.200 6/17/2022 EUR 52.860
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 9/23/2022 EUR 66.000
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.650 9/23/2022 EUR 68.240
UBS AG/London 14.250 7/19/2021 USD 66.620
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 5.600 6/23/2021 EUR 69.440
UBS AG/London 7.000 7/19/2021 CHF 53.800
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 2.500 6/21/2021 EUR 68.900
SG Issuer SA 4.000 6/22/2026 EUR 62.320
EFG International Fina 11.400 6/28/2021 USD 50.970
SG Issuer SA 11.170 7/20/2025 SEK 62.000
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 7.000 8/25/2021 EUR 73.750
UBS AG/London 6.250 6/21/2021 CHF 56.800
Vontobel Financial Pro 18.000 6/25/2021 EUR 69.910
Vontobel Financial Pro 13.500 6/25/2021 EUR 67.800
Vontobel Financial Pro 21.000 6/25/2021 EUR 75.660
Vontobel Financial Pro 15.500 6/25/2021 EUR 65.500
Vontobel Financial Pro 22.000 6/25/2021 EUR 74.690
Goldman Sachs & Co Wer 14.000 12/22/2021 EUR 74.150
Goldman Sachs & Co Wer 16.000 12/22/2021 EUR 72.600
Goldman Sachs & Co Wer 19.000 6/23/2021 EUR 68.360
Goldman Sachs & Co Wer 14.000 9/22/2021 EUR 74.070
Goldman Sachs & Co Wer 15.000 7/21/2021 EUR 73.850
Goldman Sachs & Co Wer 18.000 7/21/2021 EUR 69.530
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.700 6/16/2022 EUR 57.470
Vontobel Financial Pro 10.500 6/25/2021 EUR 73.340
Vontobel Financial Pro 12.000 6/25/2021 EUR 70.440
Goldman Sachs & Co Wer 18.000 9/22/2021 EUR 69.560
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.200 9/30/2022 EUR 46.590
Vontobel Financial Pro 16.500 6/25/2021 EUR 71.330
Vontobel Financial Pro 14.500 6/25/2021 EUR 72.740
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.600 2/25/2022 EUR 65.430
Natixis SA 2.500 07/12/2021 EUR 57.090
Leonteq Securities AG 7.600 7/13/2021 CHF 62.260
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.050 9/23/2022 EUR 64.900
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.850 9/23/2022 EUR 67.800
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.550 7/30/2021 EUR 59.540
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 2.750 5/20/2021 EUR 59.100
Bayerische Landesbank 2.000 2/18/2022 EUR 65.200
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.500 8/17/2022 EUR 70.550
UniCredit Bank AG 4.300 7/26/2022 EUR 60.980
UniCredit Bank AG 3.650 7/23/2022 EUR 61.050
UniCredit Bank AG 6.400 7/23/2021 EUR 77.010
Bayerische Landesbank 2.000 1/28/2022 EUR 66.360
Credit Suisse AG/Nassa 7.200 07/05/2021 CHF 60.150
UniCredit Bank AG 4.200 7/26/2022 EUR 42.510
UniCredit Bank AG 4.450 7/23/2022 EUR 72.310
UniCredit Bank AG 4.150 7/26/2022 EUR 62.040
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.600 7/27/2022 EUR 71.010
SG Issuer SA 4.000 08/02/2021 EUR 65.150
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 08/03/2022 EUR 64.250
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.750 08/03/2023 EUR 68.000
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 7/23/2021 EUR 65.060
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 7.500 11/03/2023 EUR 63.820
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.000 2/25/2022 EUR 73.710
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 8/18/2021 EUR 54.650
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.100 2/17/2023 EUR 58.930
UniCredit Bank AG 4.250 11/21/2021 EUR 43.670
UniCredit Bank AG 4.200 11/21/2021 EUR 58.490
Leonteq Securities AG/ 7.200 10/27/2021 CHF 65.270
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 11/24/2021 EUR 48.730
UniCredit Bank AG 4.500 1/18/2022 EUR 57.640
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.000 11/25/2022 EUR 56.590
Raiffeisen Switzerland 10.500 07/11/2024 USD 19.330
UniCredit Bank AG 3.500 2/13/2023 EUR 50.900
UniCredit Bank AG 3.600 8/23/2021 EUR 49.680
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.900 8/25/2023 EUR 36.480
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 06/08/2022 EUR 53.780
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 06/08/2022 EUR 58.630
Leonteq Securities AG 8.400 05/11/2021 CHF 60.430
UniCredit Bank AG 3.750 8/23/2021 EUR 56.100
UniCredit Bank AG 3.900 10/24/2021 EUR 50.130
UniCredit Bank AG 4.050 10/24/2021 EUR 66.110
EFG International Fina 6.200 8/16/2021 CHF 74.280
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.300 7/22/2022 EUR 63.710
UniCredit Bank AG 3.200 09/10/2022 EUR 57.130
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.600 9/24/2021 EUR 62.180
UniCredit Bank AG 3.800 10/24/2021 EUR 58.360
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.000 12/01/2022 EUR 46.580
Erste Group Bank AG 5.550 8/30/2022 EUR 54.000
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.100 5/28/2021 EUR 45.260
Vontobel Financial Pro 6.700 03/07/2022 EUR 58.150
UniCredit Bank AG 3.250 3/29/2022 EUR 20.350
UniCredit Bank AG 3.600 3/29/2022 EUR 72.080
UniCredit Bank AG 3.750 3/26/2022 EUR 63.200
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 7/21/2021 EUR 70.840
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.650 10/28/2022 EUR 61.380
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.000 08/11/2022 EUR 66.730
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.250 12/22/2022 EUR 55.490
UniCredit Bank AG 4.450 12/29/2022 EUR 44.850
UniCredit Bank AG 4.300 12/19/2021 EUR 56.430
UniCredit Bank AG 4.700 12/19/2021 EUR 40.670
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.400 01/05/2023 EUR 53.170
EFG International Fina 7.000 5/23/2022 EUR 56.980
SG Issuer SA 7.500 1/20/2025 SEK 64.760
UniCredit Bank AG 4.400 12/10/2022 EUR 64.130
UniCredit Bank AG 4.200 12/08/2021 EUR 42.520
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.400 11/24/2022 EUR 64.140
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.750 3/25/2022 EUR 61.840
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.500 3/25/2022 EUR 70.760
Leonteq Securities AG/ 4.200 06/01/2021 CHF 29.110
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.100 2/25/2022 EUR 67.930
Raiffeisen Switzerland 4.800 11/23/2023 CHF 58.990
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 6.810 4/29/2022 USD 9.900
BNP Paribas Emissions- 23.000 12/23/2021 EUR 16.360
Leonteq Securities AG/ 3.750 2/20/2023 CHF 64.020
Leonteq Securities AG 27.000 06/02/2021 CHF 7.090
EFG International Fina 6.000 8/13/2021 CHF 64.450
Leonteq Securities AG 6.000 8/17/2021 CHF 47.810
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 5.800 9/28/2021 CHF 66.900
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 4.000 4/23/2021 EUR 70.990
Corner Banca SA 6.200 10/05/2021 CHF 72.710
UniCredit Bank AG 5.750 01/11/2022 EUR 56.420
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.250 06/08/2021 EUR 55.350
HSBC Trinkaus & Burkha 6.500 6/25/2021 EUR 1.470
Natixis SA 2.970 06/08/2021 USD 72.880
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.250 2/24/2023 EUR 70.390
HSBC Trinkaus & Burkha 5.700 6/25/2021 EUR 59.070
UniCredit Bank AG 4.250 6/28/2022 EUR 58.620
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 6.000 06/11/2021 EUR 58.390
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.100 1/28/2022 EUR 62.860
UniCredit Bank AG 4.350 10/26/2021 EUR 34.460
SG Issuer SA 2.980 12/28/2021 EUR 71.540
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.550 6/25/2021 EUR 58.840
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.250 6/25/2021 EUR 69.710
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.350 9/22/2023 EUR 39.910
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.200 6/25/2021 EUR 65.340
EFG International Fina 7.000 10/25/2021 EUR 72.800
Leonteq Securities AG 6.200 06/08/2021 CHF 53.120
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 5.150 5/21/2021 EUR 54.900
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.250 12/23/2022 EUR 68.810
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.650 12/23/2022 EUR 71.650
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.700 2/24/2023 EUR 54.780
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.450 2/24/2023 EUR 50.050
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.700 11/24/2022 EUR 59.790
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 06/04/2021 EUR 68.200
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.500 1/28/2022 EUR 61.580
Bayerische Landesbank 2.300 11/26/2021 EUR 62.020
UniCredit Bank AG 5.400 06/04/2021 EUR 66.020
Leonteq Securities AG/ 5.500 5/25/2021 CHF 57.970
EFG International Fina 7.000 06/08/2021 EUR 53.710
EFG International Fina 5.550 07/12/2021 USD 4.170
UniCredit Bank AG 4.350 11/21/2021 EUR 63.570
Corner Banca SA 8.000 5/25/2021 CHF 59.590
Leonteq Securities AG 7.800 5/14/2021 CHF 17.340
EFG International Fina 6.200 8/16/2021 CHF 64.840
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.500 10/22/2021 EUR 73.970
Leonteq Securities AG 7.400 9/28/2021 CHF 72.460
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 12/23/2022 EUR 69.650
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.200 12/23/2022 EUR 68.530
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 4.250 4/14/2022 EUR 47.430
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.800 7/14/2022 EUR 71.520
UniCredit Bank AG 4.300 7/18/2021 EUR 63.760
UniCredit Bank AG 3.600 7/18/2021 EUR 45.300
UBS AG/London 21.800 6/24/2021 EUR 73.510
UBS AG/London 12.200 6/24/2021 EUR 68.090
UniCredit Bank AG 5.350 8/24/2021 EUR 50.640
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 5.000 04/05/2022 CHF 75.460
Corner Banca SA 8.600 10/12/2021 CHF 70.850
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 1/28/2022 EUR 65.690
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.350 11/19/2024 EUR 68.210
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 3/23/2022 EUR 52.970
SG Issuer SA 9.180 1/20/2025 SEK 70.170
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.800 4/25/2022 EUR 64.580
Erste Group Bank AG 4.350 2/28/2022 EUR 54.950
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.550 3/16/2023 EUR 54.740
UniCredit Bank AG 4.500 03/12/2022 EUR 57.030
UniCredit Bank AG 3.500 8/24/2022 EUR 65.710
UniCredit Bank AG 4.000 2/28/2022 EUR 62.880
UniCredit Bank AG 4.000 11/21/2022 EUR 70.650
HSBC Trinkaus & Burkha 5.000 10/07/2021 EUR 73.510
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.950 8/27/2021 EUR 65.150
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.400 11/25/2022 EUR 64.330
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.100 12/03/2021 EUR 54.910
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.800 1/28/2022 EUR 61.260
Bayerische Landesbank 2.500 12/03/2021 EUR 66.740
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.600 02/11/2025 EUR 69.310
Leonteq Securities AG/ 4.750 11/01/2021 CHF 37.930
UniCredit Bank AG 4.730 01/02/2023 EUR 64.990
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 7/23/2021 EUR 64.620
Leonteq Securities AG/ 4.290 7/30/2021 USD 40.210
SG Issuer SA 0.263 4/16/2025 EUR 29.250
Leonteq Securities AG/ 6.200 7/27/2021 CHF 69.190
UniCredit Bank AG 4.100 8/24/2022 EUR 65.880
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.000 10/22/2021 EUR 54.730
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 8/27/2021 EUR 59.800
Leonteq Securities AG 7.200 08/06/2021 CHF 70.850
Araratbank OJSC 5.250 09/11/2022 USD 25.018
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 8/31/2022 EUR 55.040
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.300 11/12/2021 EUR 67.410
SG Issuer SA 7.740 7/20/2025 SEK 75.010
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.150 8/27/2021 EUR 67.870
EFG International Fina 6.400 08/09/2021 CHF 63.610
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.600 9/23/2022 EUR 70.520
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 7/23/2021 EUR 70.000
EFG International Fina 12.000 10/19/2021 USD 67.360
Leonteq Securities AG/ 4.000 08/10/2022 CHF 66.410
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.000 5/27/2022 EUR 56.040
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.300 5/27/2022 EUR 61.960
Leonteq Securities AG 5.400 7/25/2022 CHF 63.940
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.800 05/02/2022 EUR 59.190
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.300 6/24/2022 EUR 61.070
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.400 4/30/2021 EUR 49.550
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.550 12/27/2021 EUR 57.390
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.500 12/27/2021 EUR 51.010
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.400 12/22/2022 EUR 53.280
UniCredit Bank AG 4.300 8/24/2021 EUR 50.010
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 11/10/2021 EUR 42.880
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.000 08/06/2021 EUR 40.500
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 1.000 11/02/2021 EUR 62.440
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.900 4/25/2022 EUR 49.360
Leonteq Securities AG/ 6.100 2/21/2022 CHF 73.380
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 4.500 07/12/2021 EUR 71.600
SecurAsset SA 5.250 6/30/2022 EUR 49.500
Leonteq Securities AG/ 4.000 2/21/2022 EUR 68.620
Leonteq Securities AG/ 2.500 06/05/2024 EUR 70.150
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 11.200 6/25/2021 EUR 71.130
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 9.750 8/26/2021 USD 72.180
UBS AG/London 6.750 07/05/2021 CHF 52.900
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 08/09/2023 EUR 60.000
UniCredit Bank AG 7.800 6/25/2021 EUR 65.640
UniCredit Bank AG 10.700 6/25/2021 EUR 60.450
UniCredit Bank AG 9.700 6/25/2021 EUR 64.620
UniCredit Bank AG 11.300 6/25/2021 EUR 74.950
UniCredit Bank AG 10.100 6/25/2021 EUR 71.450
UniCredit Bank AG 6.400 6/25/2021 EUR 69.360
UniCredit Bank AG 9.300 6/25/2021 EUR 62.400
UniCredit Bank AG 7.500 6/25/2021 EUR 70.990
UniCredit Bank AG 11.800 6/25/2021 EUR 57.670
UniCredit Bank AG 8.500 6/25/2021 EUR 67.050
UniCredit Bank AG 9.600 6/25/2021 EUR 63.590
UniCredit Bank AG 7.600 6/25/2021 EUR 69.870
UniCredit Bank AG 8.100 12/24/2021 EUR 65.760
UniCredit Bank AG 5.800 12/24/2021 EUR 71.490
UniCredit Bank AG 6.600 12/24/2021 EUR 72.720
UniCredit Bank AG 11.000 12/24/2021 EUR 74.970
UniCredit Bank AG 10.200 12/24/2021 EUR 59.120
UniCredit Bank AG 8.500 12/24/2021 EUR 63.450
UniCredit Bank AG 6.900 12/24/2021 EUR 68.390
UniCredit Bank AG 7.700 12/24/2021 EUR 66.070
UniCredit Bank AG 6.800 12/24/2021 EUR 68.990
UniCredit Bank AG 6.000 12/24/2021 EUR 72.230
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.000 8/27/2021 EUR 71.550
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 8/27/2021 EUR 71.970
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.000 8/27/2021 EUR 62.330
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.750 8/27/2021 EUR 58.560
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 8/27/2021 EUR 56.630
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.000 8/27/2021 EUR 53.240
Leonteq Securities AG 20.000 5/20/2021 CHF 5.350
Leonteq Securities AG 20.400 5/18/2021 CHF 5.460
Corner Banca SA 21.000 5/18/2021 CHF 5.160
Goldman Sachs & Co Wer 21.000 6/23/2021 EUR 68.750
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.000 8/27/2021 EUR 68.050
Erste Group Bank AG 8.000 7/31/2024 EUR 70.700
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.750 8/27/2021 EUR 73.340
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.750 8/27/2021 EUR 64.810
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.250 8/27/2021 EUR 66.770
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.000 8/27/2021 EUR 58.560
Corner Banca SA 30.000 06/08/2021 USD 7.330
Leonteq Securities AG/ 29.000 06/08/2021 CHF 7.530
Vontobel Financial Pro 11.500 6/25/2021 EUR 74.443
Leonteq Securities AG 30.000 06/09/2021 CHF 7.780
BNP Paribas Emissions- 9.000 6/24/2021 EUR 73.390
BNP Paribas Emissions- 9.500 6/24/2021 EUR 74.990
BNP Paribas Emissions- 11.000 6/24/2021 EUR 71.040
BNP Paribas Emissions- 8.500 6/24/2021 EUR 73.640
BNP Paribas Emissions- 10.000 6/24/2021 EUR 75.470
BNP Paribas Emissions- 11.000 6/24/2021 EUR 72.300
BNP Paribas Emissions- 13.000 6/24/2021 EUR 70.200
BNP Paribas Emissions- 15.000 6/24/2021 EUR 67.180
BNP Paribas Emissions- 7.500 6/24/2021 EUR 72.030
BNP Paribas Emissions- 8.500 6/24/2021 EUR 72.220
BNP Paribas Emissions- 12.000 6/24/2021 EUR 67.310
BNP Paribas Emissions- 11.000 6/24/2021 EUR 74.040
BNP Paribas Emissions- 13.000 6/24/2021 EUR 65.850
Leonteq Securities AG/ 6.000 06/08/2021 USD 4.250
BNP Paribas Emissions- 11.000 6/24/2021 EUR 66.060
BNP Paribas Emissions- 10.000 6/24/2021 EUR 75.440
BNP Paribas Emissions- 9.500 6/24/2021 EUR 70.120
EFG International Fina 15.000 05/06/2021 USD 7.710
Corner Banca SA 20.000 4/27/2021 CHF 5.250
UBS AG/London 8.000 03/04/2022 EUR 70.450
BNP Paribas Emissions- 0.170 9/23/2021 EUR 0.440
SG Issuer SA 1.500 12/30/2032 EUR 50.940
UBS AG/London 6.500 07/12/2021 EUR 55.650
UBS AG/London 21.250 2/18/2022 USD 62.600
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.000 05/03/2022 EUR 66.000
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 19.300 6/25/2021 EUR 60.880
Leonteq Securities AG 15.600 4/20/2021 CHF 4.180
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 13.900 6/25/2021 EUR 70.240
EFG International Fina 29.000 5/25/2021 CHF 14.760
Banque Cantonale Vaudo 6.800 6/28/2021 CHF 53.250
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.250 9/24/2021 EUR 72.660
Finca Uco Cjsc 6.000 2/25/2022 USD 25.176
Leonteq Securities AG 7.200 9/22/2021 CHF 63.640
Citigroup Global Marke 8.200 3/21/2024 SEK 56.710
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 6/22/2022 EUR 54.330
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 7/23/2021 EUR 68.260
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 7/23/2021 EUR 72.260
Leonteq Securities AG/ 3.770 7/30/2021 USD 61.070
Leonteq Securities AG 6.800 05/11/2021 EUR 53.270
UniCredit Bank AG 4.000 06/07/2022 EUR 50.240
UniCredit Bank AG 3.800 6/28/2022 EUR 59.170
UniCredit Bank AG 3.800 12/29/2022 EUR 73.450
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.500 01/05/2022 EUR 54.900
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.500 01/05/2022 EUR 53.310
UniCredit Bank AG 6.350 5/14/2021 EUR 66.080
EFG International Fina 6.200 05/03/2021 CHF 62.570
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.150 8/25/2022 EUR 61.140
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.300 2/25/2022 EUR 63.860
Societe Generale Effek 6.100 04/03/2023 EUR 59.740
UniCredit Bank AG 3.750 4/19/2022 EUR 67.430
getBACK SA 4.610 9/14/2021 PLN
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.650 6/25/2021 EUR 59.990
UniCredit Bank AG 6.300 10/16/2021 EUR 41.420
UBS AG/London 11.300 6/24/2021 EUR 69.060
UniCredit Bank AG 3.800 10/24/2021 EUR 62.660
UniCredit Bank AG 5.700 5/14/2021 EUR 60.100
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 01/05/2022 EUR 41.550
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.500 5/25/2023 EUR 39.160
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.100 4/26/2024 EUR 64.790
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 24.500 6/22/2021 EUR 27.550
EFG International Fina 27.000 6/24/2021 EUR 13.640
EFG International Fina 26.000 6/24/2021 CHF 13.150
Leonteq Securities AG 5.600 5/16/2022 CHF 63.310
UniCredit Bank AG 3.350 6/14/2022 EUR 56.860
Leonteq Securities AG/ 5.600 5/25/2021 CHF 45.350
UniCredit Bank AG 3.700 06/04/2022 EUR 64.410
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.100 8/27/2021 EUR 53.480
EFG International Fina 5.600 4/26/2021 CHF 62.480
UBS AG/London 12.900 6/24/2021 EUR 67.130
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 2.000 3/29/2022 EUR 51.070
EFG International Fina 7.600 10/11/2021 CHF 66.400
HSBC Trinkaus & Burkha 7.600 6/25/2021 EUR 1.690
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 13.100 6/25/2021 EUR 76.090
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 05/11/2022 EUR 62.750
SG Issuer SA 8.700 1/20/2025 SEK 68.610
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.700 9/24/2021 EUR 66.510
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 14.600 9/24/2021 EUR 73.580
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.500 05/11/2022 EUR 60.920
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.500 05/11/2023 EUR 70.820
Banque Cantonale Vaudo 5.800 08/09/2021 CHF 61.890
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 7.500 5/14/2021 CHF 63.930
Leonteq Securities AG/ 15.470 5/18/2021 CHF 3.650
UniCredit Bank AG 17.600 6/25/2021 EUR 59.500
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 9.300 6/25/2021 EUR 74.320
Corner Banca SA 15.200 08/11/2021 CHF 7.790
UBS AG/London 6.500 08/02/2021 CHF 63.900
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.500 12/27/2021 EUR 59.410
Leonteq Securities AG 7.200 9/24/2021 CHF 70.330
Leonteq Securities AG/ 11.400 9/20/2021 CHF 5.780
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 11.000 6/23/2021 EUR 74.320
UniCredit Bank AG 3.750 12/21/2021 EUR 65.330
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.400 2/24/2023 EUR 70.030
Leonteq Securities AG 30.000 6/22/2021 CHF 7.770
Leonteq Securities AG/ 3.380 6/16/2021 USD 47.780
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 12/21/2022 EUR 71.440
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.400 1/27/2023 EUR 67.990
Leonteq Securities AG/ 3.420 6/16/2021 USD 49.490
UniCredit Bank AG 5.150 01/02/2023 EUR 67.040
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.000 12/27/2021 EUR 65.800
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 9.000 7/30/2021 EUR 70.660
EFG International Fina 6.200 08/05/2022 EUR 70.450
EFG International Fina 11.500 08/02/2021 USD 55.400
Leonteq Securities AG 8.000 08/05/2021 CHF 72.760
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.050 9/23/2022 EUR 70.270
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.050 05/03/2021 EUR 70.360
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 6.000 5/25/2021 CHF 72.940
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 6.000 5/25/2021 EUR 70.250
UniCredit Bank AG 12.200 6/25/2021 EUR 71.350
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 7.000 6/25/2021 EUR 70.170
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 9.000 6/25/2021 EUR 66.300
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 11.300 6/25/2021 EUR 62.960
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 11.700 6/25/2021 EUR 70.040
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Ze 10.300 6/25/2021 EUR 70.850
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 7/23/2021 EUR 71.420
UniCredit Bank AG 4.150 10/12/2022 EUR 62.320
Natixis SA 1.500 10/04/2021 EUR 72.250
Leonteq Securities AG/ 9.200 9/21/2021 EUR 74.920
EFG International Fina 9.800 9/21/2021 EUR 53.540
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.550 11/26/2021 EUR 65.160
Leonteq Securities AG 6.000 9/14/2021 CHF 70.370
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 12/23/2022 EUR 64.670
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.500 6/24/2022 EUR 67.680
Bayerische Landesbank 2.250 7/23/2021 EUR 62.530
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.600 10/24/2023 EUR 67.440
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.500 10/24/2023 EUR 67.170
UniCredit Bank AG 3.850 10/05/2023 EUR 74.760
UBS AG/London 9.500 9/13/2021 CHF 74.050
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 10/12/2022 EUR 67.690
UniCredit Bank AG 3.600 10/05/2022 EUR 68.190
Center-Invest Commerci 5.250 03/03/2022 RUB 65.000
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 6.300 10/01/2021 EUR 58.900
UniCredit Bank AG 4.300 10/18/2021 EUR 49.440
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.700 10/27/2022 EUR 59.450
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.000 10/20/2022 EUR 66.070
UniCredit Bank AG 3.850 9/19/2021 EUR 41.300
Leonteq Securities AG/ 8.000 09/01/2021 CHF 69.880
UniCredit Bank AG 5.350 2/27/2023 EUR 61.980
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 03/01/2023 EUR 62.170
UBS AG/London 10.000 6/14/2021 EUR 65.550
UBS AG/London 14.750 6/14/2021 USD 9.150
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.000 9/29/2022 EUR 61.480
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.000 07/06/2021 EUR 45.800
Societe Generale SA 1.580 9/16/2024 USD 4.840
UniCredit Bank AG 3.500 9/19/2021 EUR 46.690
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.500 9/29/2021 EUR 43.350
UniCredit Bank AG 3.500 10/08/2022 EUR 56.840
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.000 10/06/2022 EUR 60.020
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.100 04/08/2022 EUR 59.120
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.300 04/08/2022 EUR 56.490
Leonteq Securities AG/ 4.000 03/08/2022 EUR 65.920
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 4.700 10/20/2021 CHF 70.650
Leonteq Securities AG 7.200 09/08/2021 CHF 57.400
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 04/12/2023 EUR 67.060
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.500 9/23/2022 EUR 70.330
Societe Generale Effek 5.600 09/04/2023 EUR 51.400
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 3.350 9/21/2022 EUR 65.510
UniCredit Bank AG 4.600 9/14/2022 EUR 66.660
UniCredit Bank AG 3.700 9/14/2022 EUR 60.420
UniCredit Bank AG 3.750 9/14/2022 EUR 67.850
Barclays Bank PLC 0.500 06/08/2022 USD 10.000
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.200 01/08/2024 EUR 60.630
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.300 9/24/2021 EUR 59.660
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.000 9/21/2023 EUR 56.180
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.250 8/27/2021 EUR 60.170
Corner Banca SA 6.400 09/07/2021 CHF 69.320
UniCredit Bank AG 3.800 8/30/2023 EUR 59.200
Opus-Chartered Issuanc 5.000 03/08/2027 USD 68.720
Bank Julius Baer & Co 10.200 5/30/2023 EUR 23.050
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.700 6/25/2021 EUR 59.970
Vontobel Financial Pro 11.500 6/25/2021 EUR 71.092
Leonteq Securities AG/ 22.620 12/23/2021 CHF 72.910
UniCredit Bank AG 4.200 9/21/2022 EUR 58.980
Leonteq Securities AG/ 25.000 8/26/2021 USD 12.710
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 2.500 6/17/2021 EUR 73.700
UBS AG/London 7.500 6/14/2021 EUR 54.400
UniCredit Bank AG 8.200 6/25/2021 EUR 76.370
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.800 2/25/2022 EUR 55.070
Raiffeisen Centrobank 5.750 7/19/2021 EUR 62.470
UniCredit Bank AG 6.000 2/22/2022 EUR 69.670
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.200 2/25/2022 EUR 73.200
Leonteq Securities AG/ 26.000 5/28/2021 CHF 6.940
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 6/25/2021 EUR 64.390
Societe Generale Effek 3.750 5/24/2021 EUR 34.340
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.700 5/17/2022 EUR 55.880
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.600 2/17/2023 EUR 64.270
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.350 2/24/2023 EUR 59.680
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 7.750 6/18/2021 EUR 65.450
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.300 3/25/2022 EUR 61.800
UniCredit Bank AG 5.450 3/15/2022 EUR 56.730
UniCredit Bank AG 7.000 3/29/2022 EUR 68.680
Leonteq Securities AG/ 3.400 3/20/2024 CHF 54.330
Leonteq Securities AG/ 2.750 9/15/2022 CHF 30.970
Leonteq Securities AG 3.600 9/22/2026 CHF 64.860
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 3.000 9/21/2029 CHF 73.450
Leonteq Securities AG 3.900 12/20/2024 CHF 61.630
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 3.200 12/18/2026 CHF 75.270
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 3.400 3/21/2025 CHF 64.680
Leonteq Securities AG/ 5.000 9/13/2021 CHF 73.600
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 2.700 9/22/2026 CHF 61.250
UBS AG/London 7.250 6/21/2021 CHF 54.100
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.300 9/24/2021 EUR 66.410
UBS AG/London 6.500 6/28/2021 EUR 53.800
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.700 3/25/2022 EUR 54.630
UniCredit Bank AG 9.600 12/27/2021 EUR 62.590
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 8/27/2021 EUR 65.940
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.400 2/25/2022 EUR 63.250
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.750 2/25/2022 EUR 55.810
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 3/15/2023 EUR 70.970
UniCredit Bank AG 3.800 9/19/2021 EUR 49.780
WEB Windenergie AG 2.250 9/25/2028 EUR 0.010
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 8.500 8/24/2021 CHF 65.230
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 5.250 8/24/2021 CHF 67.000
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.800 9/24/2024 EUR 63.000
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 9/23/2022 EUR 60.940
UBS AG/London 11.250 6/21/2021 USD 54.450
UniCredit Bank AG 9.000 12/27/2021 EUR 74.670
UniCredit Bank AG 4.200 03/01/2023 EUR 67.150
Skandinaviska Enskilda 6.300 7/15/2022 SEK 72.530
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.150 03/11/2025 EUR 65.860
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.750 11/26/2021 EUR 59.150
Leonteq Securities AG/ 5.600 8/24/2021 CHF 46.710
EFG International Fina 6.500 8/30/2021 CHF 66.910
Leonteq Securities AG/ 7.420 11/22/2021 EUR 63.630
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.690 12/23/2022 EUR 71.830
BNP Paribas Emissions- 8.000 6/24/2021 EUR 70.640
BNP Paribas Emissions- 9.500 6/24/2021 EUR 67.000
BNP Paribas Emissions- 5.000 6/24/2021 EUR 68.640
BNP Paribas Emissions- 12.000 6/24/2021 EUR 71.500
BNP Paribas Emissions- 11.000 6/24/2021 EUR 74.130
EFG International Fina 17.800 5/27/2021 USD 8.570
Vontobel Financial Pro 10.250 9/24/2021 EUR 71.790
Leonteq Securities AG 13.200 5/25/2021 CHF 63.590
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.700 12/17/2021 EUR 71.930
EFG International Fina 10.800 5/26/2021 CHF 68.380
UBS AG/London 10.000 5/20/2021 CHF 71.950
UniCredit Bank AG 4.450 01/02/2024 EUR 72.550
Bayerische Landesbank 1.350 12/23/2022 EUR 65.060
BNP Paribas Emissions- 12.000 6/24/2021 EUR 63.950
BNP Paribas Emissions- 13.000 6/24/2021 EUR 60.950
BNP Paribas Emissions- 11.000 6/24/2021 EUR 72.220
UniCredit Bank AG 4.650 12/22/2023 EUR 72.470
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 4.000 9/20/2023 EUR 66.340
Araratbank OJSC 5.500 9/19/2023 USD 25.050
UBS AG/London 7.000 8/16/2021 CHF 58.400
UBS AG/London 10.750 6/28/2021 CHF 68.000
Vontobel Financial Pro 15.500 6/25/2021 EUR 76.650
Societe Generale SA 21.000 12/23/2022 USD 74.100
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 3/24/2023 EUR 70.480
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 10.750 1/21/2022 CHF 73.170
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 5.000 9/13/2022 CHF 73.740
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.100 10/27/2023 EUR 63.810
Leonteq Securities AG/ 11.800 4/20/2021 CHF 66.100
Vontobel Financial Pro 3.400 6/18/2021 EUR 71.331
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.500 4/23/2021 EUR 64.440
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.400 4/23/2021 EUR 63.160
UBS AG/London 7.750 9/13/2021 EUR 58.800
UBS AG/London 11.750 7/22/2021 CHF 71.050
UniCredit Bank AG 11.100 7/23/2021 EUR 74.330
UBS AG/London 8.000 1/24/2022 CHF 70.800
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 5.350 7/29/2021 CHF 71.910
UBS AG/London 15.000 7/22/2021 CHF 64.700
UBS AG/London 11.250 1/24/2022 CHF 73.300
EFG International Fina 13.000 12/27/2021 CHF 12.420
Bank Julius Baer & Co 6.650 5/14/2021 EUR 68.900
Bank Julius Baer & Co 14.750 8/16/2021 EUR 5.000
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 8.000 5/14/2021 CHF 55.140
Vontobel Financial Pro 9.100 2/21/2022 EUR 72.877
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 7.000 2/21/2022 CHF 72.130
Leonteq Securities AG 11.000 01/03/2022 CHF 71.600
BNP Paribas Emissions- 10.000 9/23/2021 EUR 4.670
BNP Paribas Emissions- 5.000 06/04/2021 EUR 54.310
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 6.000 6/30/2021 EUR 62.720
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 7.000 8/18/2021 CHF 62.980
UBS AG/London 10.000 7/15/2021 CHF 72.800
UBS AG/London 11.750 6/28/2021 CHF 73.550
UBS AG/London 10.000 6/28/2021 CHF 73.300
UBS AG/London 11.000 5/17/2021 USD 66.010
Leonteq Securities AG/ 8.000 5/14/2021 CHF 56.210
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.950 10/22/2021 EUR 72.950
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 7.750 09/09/2021 EUR 71.370
Raiffeisen Centrobank 6.000 10/07/2021 EUR 69.120
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.400 4/23/2021 EUR 60.440
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 9.500 7/22/2021 EUR 66.310
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 7.500 7/28/2021 CHF 72.340
UBS AG/London 8.500 9/13/2021 EUR 65.300
UBS AG/London 14.250 10/25/2021 CHF 66.250
BNP Paribas Issuance B 7.200 12/17/2024 SEK 69.450
Leonteq Securities AG 16.000 4/13/2021 CHF 14.120
Vontobel Financial Pro 11.500 06/11/2021 EUR 71.050
UBS AG/London 7.750 5/24/2021 EUR 53.650
Vontobel Financial Pro 10.500 06/11/2021 EUR 70.680
UBS AG/London 7.750 10/25/2021 EUR 60.850
UBS AG/London 12.000 4/23/2021 CHF 67.250
UBS AG/London 7.000 10/04/2021 CHF 74.450
UBS AG/London 7.250 10/04/2021 CHF 65.400
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.900 4/23/2021 EUR 72.950
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.100 4/23/2021 EUR 68.430
UBS AG/London 7.000 9/13/2021 CHF 65.250
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 4.400 10/21/2021 CHF 57.550
Vontobel Financial Pro 16.000 06/11/2021 EUR 64.220
SG Issuer SA 0.850 10/16/2024 EUR 11.180
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 8.200 4/20/2021 CHF 68.380
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 7.500 4/21/2021 EUR 60.940
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 1.800 4/23/2021 EUR 69.430
Leonteq Securities AG 12.000 10/18/2021 CHF 71.250
Vontobel Financial Pro 5.100 5/28/2021 EUR 70.653
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 8.600 4/21/2021 CHF 61.780
EFG International Fina 10.400 10/15/2021 EUR 63.510
UBS AG/London 7.000 10/11/2021 CHF 60.050
Erste Group Bank AG 5.800 10/31/2024 EUR 69.250
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.600 6/23/2023 EUR 62.870
UBS AG/London 5.500 8/23/2021 CHF 65.500
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 6.300 12/16/2022 CHF 63.380
UBS AG/London 7.000 8/23/2021 EUR 59.150
Danske Bank A/S 6.860 07/09/2022 SEK 25.790
UniCredit Bank AG 9.200 12/24/2021 EUR 73.490
UniCredit Bank AG 10.200 6/25/2021 EUR 72.060
UniCredit Bank AG 11.400 6/25/2021 EUR 70.010
UniCredit Bank AG 8.400 12/24/2021 EUR 75.030
UniCredit Bank AG 10.300 12/24/2021 EUR 71.470
UniCredit Bank AG 15.300 6/25/2021 EUR 66.530
UniCredit Bank AG 16.700 6/25/2021 EUR 64.140
UniCredit Bank AG 11.300 12/24/2021 EUR 69.850
UniCredit Bank AG 12.400 6/25/2021 EUR 71.860
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 8.250 4/27/2021 CHF 72.260
UniCredit Bank AG 11.800 6/25/2021 EUR 67.110
UniCredit Bank AG 9.300 12/24/2021 EUR 70.980
UniCredit Bank AG 13.000 6/25/2021 EUR 65.440
UniCredit Bank AG 10.100 12/24/2021 EUR 69.670
Bank Julius Baer & Co 8.850 4/28/2021 CHF 69.600
UniCredit Bank AG 7.300 12/24/2021 EUR 73.610
UniCredit Bank AG 8.100 12/24/2021 EUR 72.110
UniCredit Bank AG 9.000 12/24/2021 EUR 70.770
UniCredit Bank AG 12.900 6/25/2021 EUR 62.440
UniCredit Bank AG 13.900 6/25/2021 EUR 70.020
UniCredit Bank AG 10.200 6/25/2021 EUR 62.210
UniCredit Bank AG 10.400 12/24/2021 EUR 63.050
UniCredit Bank AG 12.600 12/24/2021 EUR 71.800
UniCredit Bank AG 8.300 12/24/2021 EUR 65.960
UniCredit Bank AG 13.200 6/25/2021 EUR 58.390
UniCredit Bank AG 14.100 6/25/2021 EUR 60.400
UniCredit Bank AG 11.700 6/25/2021 EUR 64.680
UniCredit Bank AG 10.000 12/24/2021 EUR 68.640
UniCredit Bank AG 10.800 12/24/2021 EUR 66.890
UniCredit Bank AG 12.500 12/24/2021 EUR 63.900
UniCredit Bank AG 11.700 12/24/2021 EUR 65.360
UniCredit Bank AG 7.600 6/25/2021 EUR 73.470
UniCredit Bank AG 9.900 6/25/2021 EUR 69.240
UniCredit Bank AG 8.700 6/25/2021 EUR 71.270
UniCredit Bank AG 11.100 6/25/2021 EUR 67.340
UBS AG/London 11.750 7/29/2021 CHF 71.800
Bank Julius Baer & Co 16.250 05/04/2021 CHF 69.450
Skandinaviska Enskilda 6.000 1/15/2025 SEK 72.300
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 4.000 02/11/2022 CHF 69.390
Bank Julius Baer & Co 7.500 05/05/2021 CHF 73.450
Vontobel Financial Pro 16.500 06/11/2021 EUR 71.860
UBS AG/London 9.300 08/12/2021 CHF 71.550
UBS AG/London 7.000 08/12/2021 CHF 69.750
UniCredit Bank AG 13.200 6/25/2021 EUR 63.640
Leonteq Securities AG/ 4.500 09/02/2021 EUR 65.490
Leonteq Securities AG/ 5.910 09/02/2021 EUR 66.030
Leonteq Securities AG/ 7.290 09/02/2021 EUR 67.550
Leonteq Securities AG/ 8.590 09/02/2021 EUR 67.060
Leonteq Securities AG/ 9.660 09/02/2021 EUR 67.490
Leonteq Securities AG/ 1.430 09/02/2021 EUR 70.850
Leonteq Securities AG/ 2.470 09/02/2021 EUR 71.250
Leonteq Securities AG/ 3.650 09/02/2021 EUR 71.750
Leonteq Securities AG/ 5.020 09/02/2021 EUR 72.280
Leonteq Securities AG/ 6.330 09/02/2021 EUR 72.770
Leonteq Securities AG/ 3.290 09/02/2021 EUR 69.510
Leonteq Securities AG/ 4.570 09/02/2021 EUR 70.020
Leonteq Securities AG/ 6.020 09/02/2021 EUR 70.540
Leonteq Securities AG/ 7.440 09/02/2021 EUR 71.060
Leonteq Securities AG/ 8.760 09/02/2021 EUR 71.570
Leonteq Securities AG/ 9.900 09/02/2021 EUR 70.810
Leonteq Securities AG/ 11.390 09/02/2021 EUR 68.080
Leonteq Securities AG/ 9.220 09/02/2021 EUR 73.750
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 8.500 12/13/2021 CHF 69.870
SG Issuer SA 0.850 7/29/2024 EUR 13.530
UBS AG/London 14.000 6/28/2021 CHF 68.300
UBS AG/London 8.000 6/28/2021 CHF 75.900
UBS AG/London 13.750 6/28/2021 CHF 7.610
Vontobel Financial Pro 14.500 9/24/2021 EUR 74.180
Vontobel Financial Pro 17.000 9/24/2021 EUR 71.370
Vontobel Financial Pro 20.000 9/24/2021 EUR 69.180
Vontobel Financial Pro 23.000 6/25/2021 EUR 66.700
UBS AG/London 11.000 6/28/2021 CHF 69.700
EFG International Fina 11.120 12/27/2024 EUR 66.370
Bayerische Landesbank 2.500 7/22/2022 EUR 70.960
Vontobel Financial Pro 13.000 9/24/2021 EUR 75.650
Vontobel Financial Pro 18.500 9/24/2021 EUR 70.230
Vontobel Financial Pro 14.000 6/25/2021 EUR 75.460
Vontobel Financial Pro 15.500 6/25/2021 EUR 73.380
Vontobel Financial Pro 16.000 9/24/2021 EUR 72.840
Vontobel Financial Pro 17.500 6/25/2021 EUR 71.550
Vontobel Financial Pro 21.000 6/25/2021 EUR 68.170
UBS AG/London 10.000 12/27/2021 CHF 74.200
UBS AG/London 7.250 6/28/2021 EUR 73.250
Vontobel Financial Pro 19.500 6/25/2021 EUR 69.850
Vontobel Financial Pro 18.500 6/25/2021 EUR 70.540
Vontobel Financial Pro 20.000 6/25/2021 EUR 68.550
Vontobel Financial Pro 17.500 9/24/2021 EUR 70.200
Vontobel Financial Pro 16.500 6/25/2021 EUR 72.590
Vontobel Financial Pro 14.000 9/24/2021 EUR 74.070
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 10.800 12/07/2021 USD 54.600
UBS AG/London 12.000 12/06/2021 USD 73.560
Leonteq Securities AG/ 9.500 06/03/2021 EUR 58.900
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.700 6/25/2021 EUR 72.500
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.900 7/23/2021 EUR 71.770
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.500 7/23/2021 EUR 66.070
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.200 7/23/2021 EUR 61.100
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 6.500 7/23/2021 EUR 57.130
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.500 6/25/2021 EUR 71.960
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 6/25/2021 EUR 69.500
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.700 6/25/2021 EUR 67.530
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.750 6/25/2021 EUR 65.100
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.750 6/25/2021 EUR 63.460
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 7.750 6/25/2021 EUR 70.080
Deutsche Bank AG 3.800 02/04/2030 USD
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.050 10/22/2021 EUR 69.410
EFG International Fina 7.000 09/06/2021 EUR 74.500
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 6.600 3/23/2022 CHF 67.910
BNP Paribas Emissions- 10.000 3/24/2022 EUR 9.800
Leonteq Securities AG 10.000 8/17/2021 CHF 72.410
BNP Paribas Emissions- 5.000 3/24/2022 EUR 71.240
BNP Paribas Emissions- 7.000 3/24/2022 EUR 69.440
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.100 10/22/2021 EUR 71.690
Skandinaviska Enskilda 6.400 1/15/2025 SEK 75.120
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.800 10/22/2021 EUR 67.540
BNP Paribas Emissions- 6.000 9/23/2021 EUR 71.850
EFG International Fina 9.700 9/26/2022 CHF 13.740
BNP Paribas Emissions- 10.000 12/23/2021 EUR 7.280
BNP Paribas Emissions- 6.000 6/24/2021 EUR 69.660
UBS AG/London 7.250 09/06/2021 CHF 59.450
BNP Paribas Emissions- 7.000 12/23/2021 EUR 69.190
Leonteq Securities AG/ 6.000 5/20/2021 CHF 74.800
Societe Generale SA 8.000 7/14/2021 USD 5.000
Corner Banca SA 11.000 7/21/2021 CHF 71.570
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 8.000 10/22/2021 EUR 66.780
BNP Paribas Emissions- 9.000 9/23/2021 EUR 4.300
UBS AG/London 12.500 06/11/2021 CHF 74.300
UBS AG/London 9.000 06/11/2021 CHF 76.450
UBS AG/London 14.000 06/11/2021 CHF 59.050
Leonteq Securities AG/ 15.000 6/16/2021 CHF 61.690
EFG International Fina 15.500 6/16/2021 EUR 7.420
Leonteq Securities AG/ 11.400 6/16/2021 EUR 67.630
Leonteq Securities AG 8.000 12/13/2022 CHF 70.800
UBS AG/London 10.750 05/07/2021 USD 52.800
Leonteq Securities AG/ 10.000 05/10/2021 EUR 55.130
BNP Paribas Emissions- 7.000 6/24/2021 EUR 74.650
Barclays Bank PLC 2.000 5/28/2021 USD 11.560
Societe Generale Effek 12.240 6/25/2021 EUR 66.230
Societe Generale Effek 13.989 6/25/2021 EUR 61.650
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 14.000 5/21/2021 CHF 68.400
Societe Generale Effek 13.479 12/24/2021 EUR 67.980
UBS AG/London 7.000 9/27/2021 CHF 73.050
UBS AG/London 9.750 6/18/2021 CHF 74.250
UBS AG/London 7.000 12/20/2021 CHF 61.600
UBS AG/London 10.250 12/20/2021 CHF 74.700
UBS AG/London 12.000 12/20/2021 CHF 71.000
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.000 7/23/2021 EUR 60.490
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 6/25/2021 EUR 62.470
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.000 6/25/2021 EUR 67.870
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 6/25/2021 EUR 58.360
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.000 6/25/2021 EUR 71.550
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 6.250 12/30/2021 EUR 74.590
UBS AG/London 6.500 05/03/2021 CHF 72.150
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.500 7/23/2021 EUR 71.880
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 7.000 6/25/2021 EUR 52.610
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.000 7/23/2021 EUR 69.800
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 7.000 6/25/2021 EUR 70.920
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 5.500 12/03/2021 EUR 57.230
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.000 6/25/2021 EUR 66.950
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.000 6/25/2021 EUR 67.220
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.000 6/25/2021 EUR 60.950
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.000 7/23/2021 EUR 74.020
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.000 6/25/2021 EUR 61.910
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.500 6/25/2021 EUR 76.200
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 6.500 6/25/2021 EUR 56.270
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.500 6/25/2021 EUR 62.030
Leonteq Securities AG/ 8.150 09/02/2021 CHF 42.720
Leonteq Securities AG 11.800 12/20/2021 CHF 71.960
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 6/25/2021 EUR 66.700
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.500 6/25/2021 EUR 70.130
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.500 6/25/2021 EUR 61.200
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 6/25/2021 EUR 70.950
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 6.500 6/25/2021 EUR 73.840
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.500 6/25/2021 EUR 56.830
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.500 7/23/2021 EUR 56.300
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 5.000 7/23/2021 EUR 52.030
Leonteq Securities AG 11.000 12/20/2021 CHF 75.020
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 8.000 5/16/2022 CHF 72.260
UBS AG/London 7.000 8/30/2021 CHF 64.300
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.000 9/24/2021 EUR 71.650
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 4.000 1/14/2022 EUR 72.670
Societe Generale Effek 17.468 6/25/2021 EUR 70.550
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 8.125 02/11/2022 EUR 66.370
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 9.750 02/11/2022 USD 68.090
Leonteq Securities AG/ 11.200 08/04/2021 CHF 75.140
UBS AG/London 12.000 08/05/2021 CHF 71.650
UBS AG/London 11.500 08/05/2021 CHF 73.800
Araratbank OJSC 5.500 1/29/2024 USD 24.978
Leonteq Securities AG/ 13.500 05/12/2021 EUR 3.120
UBS AG/London 10.500 11/15/2021 CHF 73.800
UBS AG/London 11.000 5/14/2021 CHF 67.750
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 10.000 5/14/2021 EUR 74.020
Leonteq Securities AG/ 6.800 5/18/2021 EUR 60.780
BNP Paribas Issuance B 7.150 11/07/2024 SEK 71.120
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 11.500 5/20/2021 CHF 67.090
Credit Suisse AG/Londo 7.600 7/23/2021 EUR 70.540
UBS AG/London 14.000 12/20/2021 CHF 65.750
EFG International Fina 5.600 07/11/2024 EUR 25.830
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 8.000 05/07/2021 CHF 67.510
Bank Julius Baer & Co 10.000 6/21/2021 EUR 63.950
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.250 7/28/2023 EUR 67.060
Bayerische Landesbank 1.450 1/26/2024 EUR 66.660
Leonteq Securities AG/ 7.500 12/20/2021 EUR 59.750
WEB Windenergie AG 2.500 9/26/2021 EUR 0.010
Vontobel Financial Pro 20.000 6/25/2021 EUR 62.500
Vontobel Financial Pro 22.000 6/25/2021 EUR 61.120
Vontobel Financial Pro 16.500 9/24/2021 EUR 65.040
Vontobel Financial Pro 18.000 6/25/2021 EUR 63.980
Vontobel Financial Pro 16.000 6/25/2021 EUR 65.600
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 7.800 11/22/2021 CHF 60.120
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 9.000 5/25/2021 CHF 67.690
BNP Paribas Emissions- 9.000 6/24/2021 EUR 70.830
Societe Generale SA 10.000 12/02/2021 USD 64.200
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 7.060 06/02/2021 USD 58.430
BNP Paribas Emissions- 8.000 6/24/2021 EUR 64.060
UBS AG/London 7.000 11/29/2021 EUR 62.300
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 3.000 11/26/2021 EUR 61.680
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.250 11/25/2022 EUR 71.490
Vontobel Financial Pro 11.000 05/11/2021 EUR 61.217
EFG International Fina 9.000 9/20/2021 EUR 60.230
Leonteq Securities AG/ 2.290 10/29/2021 EUR 51.290
SG Issuer SA 7.440 05/03/2021 CHF 54.050
UniCredit Bank AG 10.000 6/25/2021 EUR 67.390
UniCredit Bank AG 12.300 6/25/2021 EUR 59.590
UniCredit Bank AG 7.500 6/25/2021 EUR 73.090
UniCredit Bank AG 12.300 6/25/2021 EUR 48.180
UniCredit Bank AG 10.900 12/24/2021 EUR 74.390
UniCredit Bank AG 15.100 6/25/2021 EUR 56.850
UniCredit Bank AG 5.700 12/24/2021 EUR 70.090
UniCredit Bank AG 9.900 12/24/2021 EUR 71.500
UniCredit Bank AG 9.900 6/25/2021 EUR 68.260
UniCredit Bank AG 7.400 12/24/2021 EUR 70.100
UniCredit Bank AG 11.200 6/25/2021 EUR 50.030
UniCredit Bank AG 12.800 6/25/2021 EUR 71.580
UniCredit Bank AG 11.000 6/25/2021 EUR 56.880
UniCredit Bank AG 12.900 12/24/2021 EUR 59.100
UniCredit Bank AG 9.100 12/24/2021 EUR 66.020
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 7.000 4/29/2022 EUR 73.380
SG Issuer SA 9.800 05/03/2021 USD 56.700
UniCredit Bank AG 10.200 6/25/2021 EUR 52.090
Societe Generale SA 13.010 02/02/2023 USD 65.200
UniCredit Bank AG 11.700 6/25/2021 EUR 73.430
UniCredit Bank AG 13.000 6/25/2021 EUR 60.850
UniCredit Bank AG 7.800 12/24/2021 EUR 63.230
UniCredit Bank AG 11.800 6/25/2021 EUR 73.730
UniCredit Bank AG 9.900 12/24/2021 EUR 64.490
UniCredit Bank AG 8.900 12/24/2021 EUR 53.600
UniCredit Bank AG 8.300 6/25/2021 EUR 63.780
UniCredit Bank AG 10.000 12/24/2021 EUR 58.210
UniCredit Bank AG 9.300 12/24/2021 EUR 59.740
UniCredit Bank AG 8.100 12/24/2021 EUR 55.220
UniCredit Bank AG 8.300 12/24/2021 EUR 71.070
UniCredit Bank AG 13.600 6/25/2021 EUR 66.080
UniCredit Bank AG 9.700 12/24/2021 EUR 52.150
UniCredit Bank AG 11.200 12/24/2021 EUR 49.600
UniCredit Bank AG 11.100 12/24/2021 EUR 69.140
UniCredit Bank AG 12.000 6/25/2021 EUR 54.980
Rosbank PJSC 0.030 4/30/2024 RUB 65.000
HPI AG 3.500 EUR 3.011
UBS AG/London 5.750 8/16/2021 CHF 71.550
Mifa Mitteldeutsche Fa 7.500 08/12/2018 EUR 2.100
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 7.700 8/20/2021 EUR 54.070
EFG International Fina 13.000 11/08/2021 EUR 67.940
Vontobel Financial Pro 4.300 5/24/2021 EUR 75.770
UBS AG/London 8.000 11/08/2021 CHF 59.600
Leonteq Securities AG/ 6.000 11/23/2021 CHF 55.250
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.400 6/17/2022 EUR 72.570
Raiffeisen Schweiz Gen 5.500 5/24/2022 CHF 76.090
Zurcher Kantonalbank F 9.000 06/04/2021 CHF 74.630
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 4.150 07/01/2022 EUR 59.370
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 5.750 07/12/2024 EUR 62.160
UBS AG/London 6.250 06/07/2021 CHF 53.950
UBS AG/London 8.750 06/07/2021 EUR 58.400
Bayerische Landesbank 2.700 5/14/2021 EUR 58.970
Leonteq Securities AG 6.600 10/12/2021 CHF 64.320
UniCredit Bank AG 11.400 12/24/2021 EUR 61.600
UniCredit Bank AG 12.000 6/25/2021 EUR 69.500
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 6.000 03/06/2025 EUR 54.580
UBS AG/London 14.250 05/06/2021 CHF 61.250
UBS AG/London 7.500 9/20/2021 CHF 58.300
Vontobel Financial Pro 10.000 12/24/2021 EUR 75.182
Vontobel Financial Pro 15.000 9/24/2021 EUR 65.995
Vontobel Financial Pro 19.500 6/25/2021 EUR 63.351
SG Issuer SA 0.350 11/15/2023 EUR 20.430
Vontobel Financial Pro 19.500 6/25/2021 EUR 68.488
Leonteq Securities AG/ 4.890 11/26/2021 USD 67.510
Vontobel Financial Pro 10.000 9/24/2021 EUR 73.725
Lehman Brothers Treasu 9.250 6/20/2012 USD 0.100
Mriya Agro Holding PLC 10.950 3/30/2016 USD 4.374
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.000 9/13/2010 JPY 0.100
Heta Asset Resolution 5.270 12/31/2023 EUR 1.994
Mriya Agro Holding PLC 10.950 3/30/2016 USD 4.374
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 11/30/2023 PLN 70.645
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 12/21/2023 PLN 70.412
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 04/04/2024 PLN 59.778
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.600 7/31/2013 GBP 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.320 7/31/2013 GBP 0.100
WPE International Coop 10.375 9/30/2020 USD 4.922
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.600 3/19/2018 JPY 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.280 7/31/2013 GBP 0.100
Spoldzielczy Bank Rozw 3.750 7/16/2025 PLN 74.885
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.280 11/06/2010 JPY 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 12/02/2012 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.500 7/31/2013 GBP 0.100
Leonteq Securities AG/ 15.180 12/27/2021 EUR 11.440
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 3.700 11/25/2022 EUR 68.250
Leonteq Securities AG 14.800 05/04/2021 CHF 61.760
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 2.000 11/26/2021 EUR 65.220
Landesbank Baden-Wuert 4.000 11/26/2021 EUR 59.500
Landesbank Hessen-Thue 7.770 7/15/2021 EUR 36.840
EFG International Fina 15.000 4/30/2021 CHF 67.580
DekaBank Deutsche Giro 2.300 4/16/2021 EUR 54.570
Bibby Offshore Service 7.500 6/15/2021 GBP 11.500
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.250 11/21/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.300 6/27/2013 USD 0.100
Kaupthing ehf 6.500 10/08/2010 ISK 0.250
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.950 11/04/2013 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.870 10/08/2013 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.630 03/02/2012 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.750 3/29/2012 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.000 08/08/2017 EUR 0.100
Hellas Telecommunicati 8.500 10/15/2013 EUR 0.540
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 7/28/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 7/28/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.500 03/07/2015 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.025 1/31/2015 EUR 0.100
Kuntarahoitus Oyj 0.250 6/28/2040 CAD 38.412
Getin Noble Bank SA 4.250 7/26/2024 PLN 54.818
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.820 10/20/2009 USD 0.100
IT Holding Finance SA 9.875 11/15/2012 EUR 0.255
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 3/17/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 2/16/2009 EUR 0.100
Credit Suisse AG 0.500 12/16/2025 BRL 64.694
Bank Otkritie Financia 0.010 7/16/2025 RUB 72.660
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 2/28/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.100 5/20/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.000 5/17/2010 EUR 0.100
Heta Asset Resolution 4.875 12/31/2023 EUR 1.994
Heta Asset Resolution 5.030 12/31/2023 EUR 1.994
Rosbank PJSC 0.020 4/30/2024 RUB 65.000
Kaupthing ehf 7.500 12/05/2014 ISK 0.250
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.370 7/15/2013 USD 0.100
Teksid Aluminum Luxemb 12.375 7/15/2011 EUR 0.122
Grupo Isolux Corsan SA 6.000 12/30/2021 USD 0.732
Grupo Isolux Corsan SA 1.000 12/30/2021 USD 0.265
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 1/31/2024 PLN 64.875
Rosbank PJSC 0.040 4/30/2024 RUB 65.000
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.700 06/06/2009 EUR 0.100
HSBC Bank PLC 0.500 12/22/2025 BRL 63.716
Barclays Bank PLC 10.200 2/14/2025 TRY 71.328
Sidetur Finance BV 10.000 4/20/2016 USD 2.749
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.250 3/13/2021 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.500 07/06/2009 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.103 6/22/2046 EUR 0.100
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 3/31/2023 PLN 75.230
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.500 9/13/2009 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.250 7/21/2014 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.500 03/06/2013 CHF 0.100
Espirito Santo Financi 5.625 7/28/2017 EUR 0.785
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.500 6/15/2009 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.000 08/03/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.500 10/25/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 10.000 3/27/2009 USD 0.100
Kaupthing ehf 6.125 10/04/2016 USD 0.250
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.750 6/15/2009 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 4/13/2011 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.000 4/14/2009 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.000 10/28/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.750 1/30/2009 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.860 9/21/2011 SGD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 10.500 08/09/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.000 5/22/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.000 10/24/2008 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.500 10/24/2008 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 10/24/2008 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.000 4/20/2009 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.000 07/11/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.500 12/30/2010 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.150 8/25/2020 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 12/06/2016 USD 0.100
Kreditanstalt fuer Wie 0.250 10/06/2036 CAD 49.140
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.500 10/31/2011 USD 0.100
BRAbank ASA/NO 7.440 NOK 62.052
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.585 11/22/2009 MXN 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.600 2/22/2012 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.500 10/24/2011 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.250 10/19/2012 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.400 6/20/2011 JPY 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.600 6/21/2010 JPY 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 2/14/2012 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.000 2/15/2012 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.690 2/19/2017 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 15.000 3/30/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.750 04/05/2012 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.100 05/08/2017 HKD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.000 4/24/2017 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 13.500 11/28/2008 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.680 03/05/2015 EUR 0.100
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 8/31/2023 PLN 65.875
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.750 02/07/2010 EUR 0.100
Heta Asset Resolution 0.217 12/31/2023 EUR 1.994
Kaupthing ehf 5.000 01/04/2027 SKK 0.250
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.200 3/19/2018 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 11/24/2016 EUR 0.100
SG Issuer SA 3.300 9/26/2034 ZAR 47.580
SG Issuer SA 2.700 11/28/2034 ZAR 42.832
SG Issuer SA 3.000 10/10/2034 ZAR 45.358
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.500 12/15/2011 GBP 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 11.000 6/29/2009 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 11.000 12/19/2011 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.500 08/02/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 4/24/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 9.000 3/17/2009 GBP 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.250 10/06/2008 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 9.000 6/13/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.000 11/28/2008 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.850 4/24/2009 USD 0.100
Northland Resources AB 15.000 7/15/2019 USD 2.621
Northland Resources AB 15.000 7/15/2019 USD 2.621
LBI ehf 2.250 2/14/2011 CHF 9.375
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 10/12/2010 USD 0.100
ECM Real Estate Invest 5.000 10/09/2011 EUR 15.375
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.000 10/22/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.800 11/16/2012 HKD 0.100
Petromena ASA 10.850 11/19/2018 USD 0.622
PSN Pm OOO 9.500 09/10/2026 RUB 21.625
Natixis SA 0.300 6/25/2048 USD 45.671
LBI ehf 7.431 USD 0.001
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.400 9/21/2009 HKD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.000 8/13/2011 EUR 0.100
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 11/09/2023 PLN 70.605
Kaupthing ehf 3.750 2/15/2024 ISK 0.250
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.500 8/23/2012 GBP 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 18.250 10/02/2008 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 5/23/2018 CZK 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.350 10/13/2016 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.800 12/30/2016 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.000 05/02/2022 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.250 05/12/2009 USD 0.100
Kaupthing ehf 5.250 7/18/2017 BGN 0.250
RGS Nedvizhimost OOO 12.000 10/18/2017 RUB 0.335
Lehman Brothers Treasu 13.000 7/25/2012 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 5/17/2010 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 5/30/2010 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.480 05/12/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.100 06/10/2014 SGD 0.100
Elli Investments Ltd 12.250 6/15/2020 GBP 52.265
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 9/20/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 12/20/2017 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 9.300 12/21/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 12/20/2017 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 12/20/2017 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 12/20/2017 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.800 12/27/2009 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 11.000 12/20/2017 AUD 0.100
Kaupthing ehf 4.730 12/19/2008 SKK 0.250
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 12/20/2017 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 11.000 12/20/2017 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 11.000 12/20/2017 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 01/04/2011 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 16.000 10/08/2008 CHF 0.100
KPNQwest NV 7.125 06/01/2009 EUR 0.068
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.600 10/11/2017 ILS 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.200 11/09/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.500 12/20/2027 USD 0.100
Waste Italia SpA 10.500 11/15/2019 EUR 0.500
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.500 10/12/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.375 02/04/2014 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 13.000 2/16/2009 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 12/20/2017 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.300 12/21/2018 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 11.000 2/16/2009 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.200 12/03/2008 HKD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.000 12/31/2010 USD 0.100
Kaupthing ehf 7.625 2/28/2015 USD 0.250
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.050 12/20/2010 HKD 0.100
Irish Bank Resolution 6.750 11/30/2013 BGN 33.250
Kommunalbanken AS 4.800 12/01/2022 TRY 75.963
Sberbank CIB CJSC 0.010 01/04/2030 RUB 51.366
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.000 2/26/2010 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 3/18/2015 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 12/20/2017 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 12/20/2017 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 12/20/2017 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.000 3/19/2012 USD 0.100
KPNQwest NV 8.875 02/01/2008 EUR 0.068
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.000 3/21/2018 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 03/10/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.000 05/09/2012 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 10.600 4/22/2014 MXN 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 10.442 11/22/2008 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 10.000 5/22/2009 USD 0.100
Northland Resources AB 12.250 3/26/2016 USD 2.621
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.250 04/01/2023 EUR 0.100
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 5/31/2023 PLN 70.147
Credit Agricole Corpor 10.150 02/05/2025 TRY 73.003
Getin Noble Bank SA 5.250 4/28/2023 PLN 70.093
Instabank ASA 9.430 NOK 58.748
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.700 4/21/2011 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.000 09/12/2036 JPY 0.100
Norske Skog Holding AS 8.000 2/24/2021 EUR 0.006
Lehman Brothers Treasu 13.000 12/14/2012 USD 0.100
SAir Group 2.750 7/30/2004 CHF 12.625
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 08/01/2020 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.680 12/12/2045 EUR 0.100
Deutsche Bank AG/Londo 2.000 10/25/2023 TRY 65.214
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.820 12/18/2036 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.750 2/21/2016 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.500 4/23/2014 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 15.000 06/04/2009 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.600 03/04/2010 NZD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 13.500 06/02/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.000 11/22/2012 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.600 08/01/2013 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.460 2/19/2012 JPY 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.250 09/05/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 16.800 8/21/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.000 06/05/2011 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.300 06/06/2013 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.300 06/04/2012 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 10.000 2/16/2009 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.000 2/15/2010 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 14.900 11/16/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 11.750 03/01/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.000 06/03/2010 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.600 5/21/2013 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 11.000 07/04/2011 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 11.000 07/04/2011 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.875 1/28/2011 HKD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.550 03/12/2015 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.000 6/28/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 06/02/2020 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 12.400 06/12/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.500 07/08/2013 EUR 0.100
Polski Bank Spoldzielc 3.750 9/14/2027 PLN 64.873
Lehman Brothers Treasu 10.000 6/17/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 12.000 07/04/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.850 12/22/2008 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.550 12/29/2008 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.600 3/26/2009 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.500 5/30/2010 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 14.100 11/12/2008 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.250 07/08/2014 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 08/07/2013 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 11.250 12/31/2008 USD 0.100
Kaupthing ehf 9.750 09/10/2015 USD 0.250
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.280 3/26/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 16.000 12/26/2008 USD 0.100
LBI ehf 5.080 03/01/2013 ISK 9.375
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.673 9/21/2010 JPY 0.100
Laurel GmbH 7.125 11/16/2017 EUR 7.750
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.750 01/03/2012 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.500 8/15/2012 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.500 07/02/2020 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 13.150 10/30/2008 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 13.432 01/08/2009 ILS 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.100 06/04/2010 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 16.000 11/09/2008 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 16.200 5/14/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 9.000 05/06/2011 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.450 2/20/2010 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.625 7/22/2011 HKD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 17.000 06/02/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.000 5/22/2009 USD 0.100
Kaupthing ehf 2.775 05/10/2045 ISK 0.250
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.000 4/24/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 10.000 10/23/2008 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 03/04/2015 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.430 9/25/2009 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 10.000 10/22/2008 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 16.000 10/28/2008 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.600 5/23/2012 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.450 5/23/2013 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.600 02/09/2009 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.720 12/29/2008 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.600 1/31/2013 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.060 12/29/2008 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 3.500 6/20/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.150 3/21/2013 USD 0.100
Norske Skogindustrier 2.000 12/30/2115 EUR 0.113
Lehman Brothers Treasu 7.500 2/14/2010 AUD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 10.000 06/11/2038 JPY 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 6.000 6/21/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 2.000 6/21/2011 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 8.000 12/27/2032 JPY 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 4.100 8/23/2010 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 1.500 02/08/2012 CHF 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 5.120 4/30/2027 EUR 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 0.010 9/20/2011 USD 0.100
Lehman Brothers Treasu 12.000 7/13/2037 JPY 0.100
UniCredit Bank AG 5.600 4/16/2021 EUR 61.410
*********
S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N
Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.
Copyright 2021. All rights reserved. ISSN 1529-2754.
This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.
Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.
The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each. For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.
* * * End of Transmission * * *