/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/200821.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Friday, August 21, 2020, Vol. 21, No. 168

                           Headlines



G E R M A N Y

TAKKO FASHION: S&P Upgrades ICR to CCC-, Outlook Negative
WIRECARD AG: To Be Deleted from Dax Index Following Collapse


I R E L A N D

MONTMARTRE EURO 2020-2: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating on Cl. F Notes


R U S S I A

AGRIBUSINESS HOLDING: Fitch Affirms B LT IDR, Outlook Stable


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

INTU: Joint Administrators Propose Distributions to Creditors
NEW LOOK: Fitch Cuts LT IDR to C on Proposed Restructuring
NMC HEALTH: Abu Dhabi Unit Plans to File for Administration
NMC HEALTH: Receives Expressions of Interest for Fertility Biz
RESTAURANT GROUP: Firejacks Restaurant Won't Be Reopening

SEQUENCE FINANCIAL: Goes Into Administration, Halts Trading
VALARIS PLC: Moody's Cuts PDR to D-PD on Bankruptcy Filing
WOODFORD EQUITY: Investors to Share in GBP183MM Capital Return


X X X X X X X X

[*] BOOK REVIEW: Mentor X

                           - - - - -


=============
G E R M A N Y
=============

TAKKO FASHION: S&P Upgrades ICR to CCC-, Outlook Negative
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its long-term issuer credit rating on
Takko Fashion S.a.r.l. (Takko) to 'CCC-' from 'SD' and its issue
rating on the secured notes to 'CCC-' from 'D'.

Takko resumed interest payments on its senior secured notes
following pent-up demand after lockdown measures were lifted.

Following the end of the COVID-19-related lockdown in Germany and
other markets, Takko has reaped the benefits of pent-up demand in
recent months, increasing our visibility of its earnings. SP said
"Consequently, we have revised our expectations, with a sales
decline of 13%-18% now expected this year from up to 25%
previously. In light of stabilized cash flow generation, Takko has
also resumed interest payments on its senior secured notes
following the payment of the coupons due on Aug. 14. The group had
previously decided to suspend the coupon payment due for May
unilaterally, which we considered a default under our criteria."
Alongside the payment in August, Takko also paid the accrued
interest from May, after payment deferral to August was essentially
confirmed by bondholders in June.

The group remains vulnerable to economic and market conditions to
meet its financial obligations over the coming 12 months.  S&P
said, "In our base-case scenario, we do not expect another
shortfall of liquidity. We note, however, that the gross available
liquidity buffer of about EUR100 million (gross of cash needs for
operational purposes such as cash in tills) as of early August is
limited. This is given our expectation of high market volatility;
subdued economic recovery that could hamper customer spending on
discretionary items; and several payment deferrals during
lockdown--including on interest, taxes, or rents--that need to be
made up over the coming months. We also note that the apparel
business is highly weather dependent and there is a risk that an
unusually warm autumn season could affect cash generation, as seen
in 2018. Moreover, following the pandemic, we believe that customer
demand for online shopping is accelerating but we see this as an
underdeveloped sales channel for Takko. Overall, we still note
material downside risk to the group's liquidity cushion over the
coming quarters and it is dependent on favorable market conditions
to meet its financial commitments."

S&P said, "We assume Takko will likely receive the required
covenant reset from the revolving credit facility (RCF) lenders,
but still see associated risks.  Although we understand that no
negotiations about a balance sheet restructuring are currently
underway, we note that the group will likely not comply with the
minimum EBITDA financial maintenance covenant included in its RCF
documentation. We understand that this could accelerate the
repayment of debt outstanding if the lending banks do not waive the
expected breaches or agree to a covenant reset. We assume that the
banks will likely agree to a waiver or reset given Takko's improved
earnings and cash generation and the temporary suspension on the
last testing date, but risks remain until this is agreed."

Uncertainties regarding the effects of the pandemic and recession
still cloud our earnings visibility.  S&P Global Ratings
acknowledges a high degree of uncertainty about the evolution of
the coronavirus pandemic. The consensus among health experts is
that the pandemic may now be at, or near, its peak in some regions
but will remain a threat until a vaccine or effective treatment is
widely available, which may not occur until second-half 2021. S&P
said "We are using this assumption in assessing the economic and
credit implications associated with the pandemic. As the situation
evolves, we will update our assumptions and estimates
accordingly."

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors relevant to the
rating action:

-- Health and safety

The negative outlook indicates that the group's operational cash
generation could weaken again, which could happen if it faces
another major business disruption due to COVID-19, unusual adverse
weather conditions, or decreasing customer demand in light of the
current economic recession. It also reflects uncertainties around
the covenant waiver from bank lenders, which if not obtained could
accelerate repayment.

S&P said "We could lower the rating in case of a new liquidity
shortfall over the coming quarters potentially triggering a
restructuring of the capital structure that we may view as being
distressed. We could also lower the rating if banks do not waive
the expected covenant breach or agree to a covenant reset.

"We could revise our outlook to stable in case of a long period of
stable operating conditions and further cash accumulation, in
combination with more certainty on the effect of the recession and
pandemic on consumer demand. A stable outlook would also hinge on
the group eventually securing a durable covenant waiver or reset
and being able to manage its liquidity."


WIRECARD AG: To Be Deleted from Dax Index Following Collapse
------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Miller at The Financial Times reports that Wirecard is to be
deleted from Germany's blue-chip Dax index, weeks after the
payments provider's spectacular collapse into insolvency following
the revelation of a long-running fraud.

Once the country's most celebrated financial tech group, Wirecard
was first promoted to the Dax--which contains Germany's 30 leading
companies--in 2018, when it replaced the ailing Commerzbank, the FT
recounts.

But following persistent reports of accounting irregularities, the
Aschheim-based company admitted in June that EUR1.9 billion of cash
was missing, causing its shares to lose almost all of their value
in a rapid fall from grace, the FT relates.

At its height, Wirecard stock traded at almost EUR200, but it will
leave Germany's prestigious index with its shares worth little more
than EUR1 each, the FT notes.

Although Wirecard filed for insolvency soon after its admission,
Deutsche Boerse, which runs the Dax, was not scheduled to review
the index's constituents until September, the FT discloses.

Facing pressure from investors, the group pushed through a
rule-change to allow it to remove Wirecard earlier than planned,
the FT states.

Wirecard will also be removed from the TecDAX index, according to
the FT.




=============
I R E L A N D
=============

MONTMARTRE EURO 2020-2: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating on Cl. F Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its credit ratings to Montmartre Euro
CLO 2020-2 DAC's class A, B-1, B-2, C, D, E, and F notes. At
closing, the issuer also issued unrated subordinated notes.

Under the transaction documents, the rated notes will pay quarterly
interest unless there is a frequency switch event. Following this,
the notes will switch to semiannual payment.

The portfolio's reinvestment period will end approximately 2.9
years after closing.

The ratings assigned to the notes reflect S&P's assessment of:

-- The diversified collateral pool, which consists primarily of
broadly syndicated speculative-grade senior secured term loans and
bonds that are governed by collateral quality tests.

-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization.

-- The collateral manager's experienced team, which can affect the
performance of the rated notes through collateral selection,
ongoing portfolio management, and trading.

  Portfolio Benchmarks
                                                         Current
  S&P Global Ratings weighted-average rating factor     2,538.13
  Default rate dispersion                                 681.17
  Weighted-average life (years)                             5.21
  Obligor diversity measure                                86.64
  Industry diversity measure                               14.52
  Regional diversity measure                                1.45

  Transaction Key Metrics
                                                         Current
  Total par amount (mil. EUR)                             300.00
  Defaulted assets (mil. EUR)                               0.00
  Number of performing obligors                               97
  Portfolio weighted-average rating
   derived from our CDO evaluator                            'B'
  'CCC' category rated assets (%)                           1.17
  Covenanted 'AAA' weighted-average recovery (%)           37.07
  Covenanted weighted-average spread (%)                    3.40
  Covenanted weighted-average coupon (%)                    4.00

S&P said, "Our ratings reflect our assessment of the collateral
portfolio's credit quality, which has a weighted-average rating of
'B'. We consider that the portfolio will be well-diversified on the
effective date, primarily comprising broadly syndicated
speculative-grade senior secured term loans and senior secured
bonds. Therefore, we conducted our credit and cash flow analysis by
applying our criteria for corporate cash flow collateralized debt
obligations.

"In our cash flow analysis, we used the EUR300 million par amount,
the covenanted weighted-average spread of 3.40%, the covenanted
weighted-average coupon of 4.00%, and the covenanted
weighted-average recovery rates for all rating levels designated by
the collateral manager. We applied various cash flow stress
scenarios, using four different default patterns, in conjunction
with different interest rate stress scenarios for each liability
rating category."

The transaction's documented counterparty replacement and remedy
mechanisms adequately mitigate its exposure to counterparty risk
under our current counterparty criteria.

S&P said, "Following the application of our structured finance
sovereign risk criteria, we consider the transaction's exposure to
country risk to be limited at the assigned preliminary ratings, as
the exposure to individual sovereigns does not exceed the
diversification thresholds outlined in our criteria.

"We consider that the transaction's legal structure is bankruptcy
remote, in line with our legal criteria.

"Our credit and cash flow analysis indicates that the available
credit enhancement for the class B notes could withstand stresses
commensurate with higher rating levels than those we have assigned.
However, as the CLO is still in its reinvestment phase, during
which the transaction's credit risk profile could deteriorate, we
have capped our assigned ratings on the notes. In our view, the
portfolio is granular in nature, and well-diversified across
obligors, industries, and asset characteristics when compared to
other CLO transactions we have rated recently. As such, we have not
applied any additional scenario and sensitivity analysis when
assigning ratings on any classes of notes in this transaction.

"Until the end of the reinvestment period on July 15, 2023, the
collateral manager is allowed to substitute assets in the portfolio
for so long as our CDO Monitor test is maintained or improved in
relation to the initial ratings on the notes. This test looks at
the total amount of losses that the transaction can sustain as
established by the initial cash flows for each rating, and compares
that with the default potential of the current portfolio plus par
losses to date. As a result, until the end of the reinvestment
period, the collateral manager may, through trading, deteriorate
the transaction's current risk profile, as long as the initial
ratings are maintained.

"Following our analysis of the credit, cash flow, counterparty,
operational, and legal risks, we believe that our ratings are
commensurate with the available credit enhancement for the class A,
B-1, B-2, C, D, E, and F notes.

"Taking the above into account and following our analysis of the
credit, cash flow, counterparty, operational, and legal risks, we
believe that our ratings are commensurate with the available credit
enhancement for all of the rated classes of notes.

"In addition to our standard analysis, to provide an indication of
how rising pressures among speculative-grade corporates could
affect our ratings on European CLO transactions, we have also
included the sensitivity of the ratings on the class A to E notes
to five of the 10 hypothetical scenarios we looked at in our recent
publication.

S&P Global Ratings acknowledges a high degree of uncertainty about
the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic. The consensus among
health experts is that the pandemic may now be at, or near, its
peak in some regions but will remain a threat until a vaccine or
effective treatment is widely available, which may not occur until
the second half of 2021. S&P said, "We are using this assumption in
assessing the economic and credit implications associated with the
pandemic. As the situation evolves, we will update our assumptions
and estimates accordingly."

Montmartre Euro CLO 2020-2 DAC is a European cash flow CLO
securitization of a revolving pool, comprising euro-denominated
senior secured loans and bonds issued mainly by speculative-grade
borrowers. CBAM CLO Management Europe LLC will manage the
transaction.

  Ratings List

  Class   Rating   Amount Subordination (%) Interest rate*
                  (mil. EUR)
  A       AAA (sf)   180.00     40.00     Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                            plus 1.59%
  B-1     AA (sf)     20.00     30.00     Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                            plus 2.25%
  B-2     AA (sf)     10.00     30.00     2.65%
  C       A- (sf)     34.50     18.50     Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                            plus 2.90%
  D       BBB- (sf)   15.00     13.50     Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                            plus 4.00%
  E       BB- (sf)    11.25      9.75     Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                            plus 6.43%
  F       B- (sf)      5.25      8.00     Three/six-month EURIBOR
                                            plus 6.92%
  Sub. notes  NR      24.74      N/A      N/A

*The payment frequency switches to semiannual and the index
switches to six-month EURIBOR when a frequency switch event occurs.

EURIBOR--Euro Interbank Offered Rate.
NR--Not rated.
N/A--Not applicable.




===========
R U S S I A
===========

AGRIBUSINESS HOLDING: Fitch Affirms B LT IDR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Russia-based Agribusiness Holding
Miratorg LLC's Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency Issuer Default
Ratings at 'B'. The Outlook is Stable. Fitch has simultaneously
withdrawn all ratings for commercial reasons.

The ratings reflect Miratorg's currently heightened leverage levels
due to ongoing, largely debt-funded, capex expansion projects and
high number of guarantees provided for related parties'
liabilities. This is balanced by the group's large scale, its
strong market positions in Russia and a high degree of vertical
integration across the value chain, which results in strong EBITDA
margins.

The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation that following high
leverage in 2019-2021, the company should gradually deleverage from
2022 as new production facilities will come on stream, as well as
its assumption that Miratorg will be able to maintain ready access
to bank financing and obtain funding for new investments on a
timely basis.

The ratings were withdrawn with the following reason: for
commercial purposes

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Vertically Integrated Business Model: Miratorg's ratings are
supported by the group's robust business model. Miratorg is the
largest pork producer and ranks among the top 10 chicken producers
in Russia. It benefits from vertical integration across the value
chain, from crop growing and fodder production to livestock and
poultry breeding, slaughtering and product delivery. High vertical
integration enables the group to maintain EBITDA margins higher
than its peers and to smooth out the business's inherent
volatility.

Expansion in Progress: Miratorg is in the middle of its massive
project to double pork production by 2024 toward 1 million tonnes
(2019: 428,000 tonnes) driving industry consolidation trends,
increasing its market share at the expense of small players and
household producers, while participating in growing export
opportunities. In 2018-19, Miratorg invested RUB44 billion out of a
total project cost of RUB156 billion. However peak investments are
planned for 2020-2021 at around RUB112 billion. Miratorg is also
investing RUB5 billion in growing its poultry capacities by nearly
32% or 35,000 tonnes, which should become operational in 2021.

Fitch estimates execution risks related to the projects are
limited, based on Miratorg's strong track record in green field
farms and processing capacities launches over the last decade.
Fitch expects that once completed, Miratorg's credit profile will
benefit from the group's greater scale, strengthened market
positions and economies of scale.

Leverage at Peak: As a result of large investments anticipated in
2020-21, Fitch expects Miratorg's funds from operations (FFO) gross
leverage to be high at 7.5x in 2020 (2019: 7.0x), more in line with
a lower rating, before gradually declining toward 5.0x in 2022 once
capacity starts to ramp up and capex normalises. Current high
leverage levels continue to pressure Miratorg's credit profile. The
projected deleveraging pace would also be subject to Miratorg's
other expansion plans, as well as the extent of support provided to
related-party projects where Moody's has less visibility.

Support to Related-Party Project: In 2019 Miratorg provided RUB10
billion in loans to related parties, mainly the beef business
developed by its shareholders. In addition, Miratorg supports it
via working capital, increasing receivables from related parties by
RUB3.7 billion and buying rights for their receivables from third
parties of RUB2.4 billion in 2019. Moody's conservatively factors
in cash support from Miratorg through related-party loans of around
RUB5 billion per year over 2020-2023 and assume higher working
capital investments, capturing the possibility of further support
to related parties.

At end-2019 Miratorg also guaranteed RUB41.0 billion (2018: RUB41.6
billion) working capital loans of its beef business but reduced
this to RUB25.4 billion by June 2020. Moody's treats these
guarantees as off-balance sheet debt and add the amount to
Miratorg's own debt obligations, which is expected to contribute
0.8x to FFO gross leverage in 2020.

Profitability of Pork Under Pressure: Fitch expects EBITDA margin
in the core pork segment (2019: 58% of group EBITDA) to remain
pressured at around 37% vs. an average 46% in 2016-18 (based on
gross revenue) due to further, albeit slower, decline in pork
prices in the country, stemming from growing meat supply from both
local producers and importers.

Together with subdued consumer sentiment in Russia, Moody's does
not expect a fast recovery in pork prices in the near term.
Profitability of the pork segment will be dragged down by the lower
margins of the new production facilities until they reach planned
capacity post-2023. While below historical averages, the projected
EBITDA margin will remain at very strong levels compared with
international peers.

Accelerated Exports: In 1H20 Miratorg doubled its export sales
volumes, mainly driven by the opening of the Chinese market for
poultry in 2019 and pork in 2020. Increased export sales allowed
the group to fully offset reduced demand from the hotel and
restaurant sales channel (nearly 18% of revenue in 2019), which
domestically resulted from COVID-19-related social distancing
measures. Moody's also anticipates that increasing exports by
Russian pork and poultry producers to China and Middle East should
help support internal meat prices, absorbing part of growing
domestic supply.

Other Segments Support Profit: Fitch estimates lower profitability
in the pork segment in 2020 will be partly offset by continued
growth in other profitable segments. The poultry and crop farming
divisions, which have EBITDA margins of 30% or above, continue to
demonstrate revenue growth on the back of further output increase
and a more favourable price environment. However, as new pork
facilities will ramp up, the share of other segments in EBITDA is
likely to return to below 30% (2019: 42%).

Weak Governance Drags on Credit Profile: In Fitch's view,
Miratorg's corporate governance is not in line with international
standard practices due to key man risk from its two shareholders,
related-party transactions, guarantees provided outside the group
perimeter and a complex group structure. Miratorg's audited
consolidated accounts include entities that it controls the
operations of but does not own. Weak governance practices continue
to have a moderate negative impact on the group's credit profile.

State Support for the Sector: As an agricultural producer, Miratorg
enjoys a favourable tax regime and subsidised interest rates. This
helps its cash flow generation, leading to improved financial
flexibility. As food self-sufficiency remains one of key objectives
of the Russian government, Fitch expects state support to
agricultural producers to be maintained over the next four years.
Its rating case assumes this level of state support is maintained
but also recognises that the company's increasingly strong scale
benefits and market position would enable it to successfully cope
with a less favourable environment.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Miratorg has a smaller business size and weaker ranking on a global
scale than industry leaders Tyson Foods Inc. (BBB/Negative),
Smithfields Foods Inc. (BBB/Stable) and BRF S.A. (BB/Stable).
Furthermore, Miratorg's projected leverage is substantially higher
than peers and the group's rating also incorporates weak corporate
governance practices.

Miratorg has a similar vertically integrated business model and
comparable size with the largest Ukrainian poultry producer and
exporter MHP SE (B+/Stable), whose rating is also pressured by
Ukraine's operating environment. Compared with MHP, Miratorg has
higher Fitch-projected leverage and weaker corporate governance,
which result in a rating difference.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Revenue and EBITDA to grow at around 15% CAGR over 2020-2023,
driven mostly by increasing pork production volumes

  - Capex related to construction of new pork production capacity
of around RUB112 billion in total over 2020-2023

  - Capex-related expansion of existing pork capacity, other
projects and maintenance capex together of around RUB14 billion per
year over 2020-23

  - Maintenance of high requirement for working-capital related to
pork doubling project as well as potential support to related
parties with net working capital as percentage of revenue at around
to 36% in 2020-21 (2019: 30%) before normalisation toward 30% by
2023

  - Maintenance of state support to the sector, including interest
rate subsidies, favourable tax regime

  - Additional loans to related parties not exceeding RUB5 billion
per year over 2019-2022

  - Guarantees to related parties' liabilities, which Moody's
treats as Miratorg's own debt, stable at RUB25.4 billion

  - Annual RUB5 billion dividends from 2022

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Insufficient Liquidity: At end-December 2019 Fitch-adjusted
unrestricted cash balances of RUB15.9 billion, and long-term
committed undrawn credit facilities of RUB16.85 billion were
insufficient to cover short-term debt of RUB53.4 billion and
expected negative free cash flow driven by high capex.

Liquidity sources do not take into account funding for new pork
production capacity as credit agreements have not yet been signed.
However, the credit limit has been approved by one of the largest
Russian banks and management is confident it will be able to obtain
the necessary funding on a timely basis. Miratorg's liquidity
should be supported by the renewal of existing short-term committed
facilities (2019: RUB5.5 billion), given the track record of timely
rollover, as well as the group's strong relationships with Russian
state-owned banks.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch has added guarantees provided for related-party obligations
to Miratorg's off-balance sheet debt (2019: RUB40.9 billion).

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF
RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are
described in the Applicable Criteria.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of 3 - ESG issues are credit
neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either
due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by
the entity.

Miratorg has an ESG Relevance Score of 4 for Governance Structure
due to the concentrated ownership, lack of board independence and
complex group structure, which has a modest negative impact on the
credit profile, and is relevant to the rating in conjunction with
other factors.

Following the withdrawal of Miratorg's ratings, Fitch will no
longer be providing the associated ESG Relevance Scores to the
rating in conjunction with other factors.



===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

INTU: Joint Administrators Propose Distributions to Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Yadarisa Shabong at Reuters reports that the joint administrators
of Intu Properties on Aug. 19 proposed distributions to certain
creditors of the collapsed mall operator from available funds and
listed a number of exit strategies to end the administration.

According to Reuters, KPMG, which was appointed as administrator in
June after the owner of Manchester's Trafford Center and Lakeside
in Essex failed to reach a deal with its lenders, said they have
realised cash at bank of GBP151 million in the period covered by
its proposals.

Exit strategies to end Intu's administration included placing the
company into creditors' voluntary liquidation, applying to the
court for control to be returned to the company's directors and
formulating a proposal for a company voluntary arrangement, among
others, Reuters discloses.


NEW LOOK: Fitch Cuts LT IDR to C on Proposed Restructuring
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded New Look Bonds Ltd's Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating to 'C' from 'CC'. Fitch has also affirmed the rating
of its GBP440 million senior secured notes due in May 2024, issued
by New Look Financing Plc, at 'C' but downgraded its Recovery
Rating to 'RR6'/3% from 'RR5'/18%.

New Look is the entity that indirectly owns the main operating
company New Look Retailers Ltd, which operates as a multi-channel
value fashion retailer in the UK clothing & footwear market.

The downgrade reflects New Look's debt restructuring and company
voluntary arrangement procedure announcement. The proposed debt
restructuring, including a material senior debt amount reduction to
GBP100 million from GBP540 million and the CVA on its lease
portfolio and other creditors, represents a distressed debt
exchange based on Fitch's criteria.

New Look has reopened the majority of its 496 stores but is still
experiencing a decline of 38% of its revenue on a like-for-like
basis compared with pre-pandemic levels. New Look has managed its
liquidity tightly during the pandemic by deferring various
payments. The announced restructuring should provide greater
financial flexibility by extending its working capital facilities,
a GBP40 million new money injection and rebasing lease
obligations.

If the restructuring plan is approved, upon completion of the DDE,
Fitch will downgrade New Look's Long-Term Issuer IDR to 'RD'
(Restricted Default) before assigning a new rating based on the
group's business prospects and new capital structure.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Restructuring will Constitute a DDE: The restructuring will
materially reduce senior secured debt by GBP440 million in an
exchange for a GBP40 million subordinated shareholder loan maturing
in 2029 and a 20% non-voting equity interest. Existing senior
secured notes holders will maintain control of New Look, subject to
their participation in the GBP40 million new money. Maturity will
be extended for its GBP65 million operating facility to June 2023
and for its GBP100 million revolving credit facility (RCF) to June
2024 (from June 2021). A CVA will help resolve rental arrears and
other non-critical creditor balances; it will also rebase rents by
linking the payable rent amounts to stores' turnover.

Liquidity Compromised by COVID-19: During the three months of shop
closures with minimal online revenues, New Look did not have
sufficient liquidity to pay for its inventories and it suspended
payments to its suppliers. It also did not pay rent since the end
of March to preserve cash until the re-opening of stores. It made
use of government support on 80% staff costs and business rate
holiday, and cut variable costs. New Look closed all its stores by
March 21, 2020, while maintaining its online operations (around 20%
of revenues). While most of its stores are now open it is
struggling given a sharp drop in footfall experienced across the
sector, due to the pandemic, with like-for-like sales 38% yoy
lower.

Turnaround not Fully Realised: In February 2020 New Look lowered
its pre COVID-19 EBITDA guidance for financial year to March 2020
to GBP60 million-GBP76 million from GBP100 million under its
turnaround plan, compared with a Fitch-expected GBP86 million.
Revenue and profits have declined alongside footfall and online
traffic, despite progress on its original turnaround plan.
Turnaround strategy to restore its value-for-money and broad-appeal
reputation is plausible, and New Look has managed to cut costs,
improved its inventory management and reduced markdowns in 3Q20,
along with reducing lead times from sourcing to store. It has also
recruited experienced industry professionals to transform the
business.

New CVA/Cost Savings Ahead: The new CVA, expected to launch on
August 26, if approved, should enhance operating and financial
flexibility post-pandemic by reducing rental expense (one of the
key cost items) and linking it to turnover. Fitch estimates
operating leases accounted for almost 70% of EBITDAR in FY20. In
addition, New Look has achieved large savings via headcount
reduction, HQ rationalisation, exit of non-core and loss-making
markets, ongoing efficiency programmes and opening negotiations
with its suppliers over payment terms.

Competitive UK Clothing Market: New Look operates in a crowded UK
mass market clothing sector characterised by reduced consumer
confidence and stiff competition. The group is also challenged by a
new generation of pure online retailers such as ASOS, Boohoo.com
and The Very Group, who benefit from a lower cost base and a lack
of legacy IT and logistics systems. New Look also competes with
traditional store-based retailers such as Next Plc and Marks &
Spencer plc (BB+/Stable), which are developing their online
offering and integrating this channel into their existing store
portfolio.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

New Look is a multi-channel fashion retailer operating in the value
segment of the UK clothing & footwear market for women, men and
teenage girls. Its e-commerce platform is a key differentiating
factor relative to other sector peers, such as Novartex SA (C).
However, prior issues around product, brand and pricing perception
have led to a decline in market share, even in its online channel.

Despite enhanced financial flexibility following its latest
financial restructuring (between March 2018 and May 2019), the
forced store closures in lockdown has led us to forecast excessive
funds from operations adjusted gross leverage, with a weak
liquidity position given the traditional inventory build-up in the
early spring. Its credit and liquidity profiles mirror those of
Novartex but contrast with online asset-light retailers, such as
Boohoo, ASOS and The Very Group (B-/Stable), some of which have
been still able to sell through their online channels during the
lockdown, with structurally stronger cash generation than
store-based retail peers'.

Novartex was downgraded to 'C' from 'CC' in April 2020, following
its public announcement of filing for a safeguard process to allow
it to suspend payments to landlords and suppliers while it works on
a restructuring plan.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions within its Rating Case for the Issuer:

Once the proposed debt restructuring completes, if a rating is
maintained, Fitch would establish new assumptions in support of its
long-term forecasts for the business with a new capital structure.
This is expected to happen once Fitch has discussed the company's
revised business plan with management and assessed it.

Key Recovery Assumptions:

  - Moody's maintains a going-concern approach as Fitch believes
creditors are likely to maximise their recoveries via a
restructuring or a sale as a going-concern as opposed to
liquidation. Importantly, going-concern value is also higher than
value in liquidation.

Moody's uses a going-concern EBITDA of around GBP50 million, which
implies a 0% discount to the forecast FY20 EBITDA. This is below
its previous analysis (GBP70 million) as it takes into account a
longer- lasting effect of the pandemic on the company's operations.
This level of EBITDA in a post-restructuring scenario (outside of
coronavirus) is enough to cover maintenance capex of GBP25 million,
taxes and working-capital needs.

Moody's maintains a distressed EV/EBITDA multiple of 4x, reflecting
the scale of the business relative to peers' and its view of its
redeemable business model. Moody's assumes that the surviving drawn
debt and shareholder loan equate to the group's sustainable
enterprise value, pointing to around a 4x multiple based on
forward-looking EBITDA.

After deducting 10% for administrative claims, based on the
existing debt waterfall where the RCF (GBP100 million) and the
utilised operating facilities (GBP65 million) rank super senior,
Fitch expects the senior secured notes to achieve recoveries within
the 'RR6' range with an output percentage based on current metrics
and assumptions at 3%, indicating a 'C' instrument rating. The
senior secured note notional amount includes accrued PIK interest.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

  - A direct upgrade of the IDR to 'CC' is unlikely at present.

Post-restructuring a new capital structure leading to a sustainable
debt service capability, improved liquidity and debt maturity
profiles, and enabling New Look to strengthen its operating profile
may lead to an upgrade

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

  - Implementation of a DDE, which would lead to a downgrade to
'RD'

  - Failure to receive minimum approvals for a comprehensive debt
restructuring, leading to administration, liquidation or other
formal winding-up procedures, would lead to a downgrade to 'D'

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Tight Liquidity Profile: Fitch had expected New Look would run out
of cash by September 2020, assuming its stores remained closed for
three months. While trading has resumed and liquidity has been
tightly managed, the upcoming financial restructuring is needed to
shore up the group's liquidity buffer, by way of rebased lease
payments, a new capital injection, along with extension of the
operating facilities and RCF. This is critical for the group to
meet seasonal payments related to the autumn-winter clothes
collection and invest in, and deliver, on its strategic business
plan.

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF
RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are
described in the Applicable Criteria.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

The highest level of ESG credit relevance, if present, is a score
of 3. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a
minimal credit impact on the entity(ies), either due to their
nature or to the way in which they are being managed by the
entity(ies).

NMC HEALTH: Abu Dhabi Unit Plans to File for Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------
Saeed Azhar and Hadeel Al Sayegh at Reuters report that NMC
Healthcare LLC plans to file for administration in Abu Dhabi, the
UAE-based hospitals operator said on Aug. 19, as it targets a
three-year recovery plan involving a debt moratorium, debt
restructuring and asset sales.

Its London-listed holding company NMC Health Plc is already being
run by administrators Alvarez & Marsal after going into
administration in April following months of turmoil over its
finances, Reuters notes.

According to Reuters, NMC Healthcare LLC plans to file for
administration with the Abu Dhabi financial centre ADGM, it said in
a presentation posted on its website on Aug. 19.

It said Alvarez & Marsal will also be appointed as administrators
of the UAE business, Reuters relates.

"We are looking to move there as soon as we can," Marija Simovic,
managing director of Alvarez & Marsal told Reuters, saying the
administrators were working with lenders.

NMC's implosion this year amid allegations of fraud and the
disclosure of more than US$4 billion (GBP3 billion) in hidden debt
has left some UAE and overseas lenders with heavy losses and
prompted legal battles to try and recover money owed, Reuters
discloses.

NMC Health is the largest private healthcare provider in the UAE,
operating more than 200 facilities including hospitals, clinics and
pharmacies.

As part of its restructuring plan, NMC and its lenders will have
until Jan. 30, 2021, to deliver a binding reorganization plan or
the process will move to core asset sales, Reuters relays.

NMC, as cited by Reuters, said negotiations will begin soon and a
term sheet will be delivered to lenders by Oct. 31.

NMC has agreed to terms with existing lenders to raise up to US$300
million to fund the business as it prepares to enter
administration, Reuters recounts.

NMC said significant cash has been extracted from the company,
resulting in constrained liquidity and payment defaults to lenders
and suppliers, according to Reuters.


NMC HEALTH: Receives Expressions of Interest for Fertility Biz
--------------------------------------------------------------
Saeed Azhar at Reuters reports that hospital group NMC Health has
received expressions of interest from more than 60 potential
bidders for its international fertility business, one of the first
non-core assets it plans to sell as part of a recovery plan, its
acting CEO said on Aug. 19.

NMC's acting CEO Michael Davis and Marija Simovic, managing
director of NMC's administrators Alvarez & Marsal, told Reuters the
Boston IVF business may be included in the sale process alongside
the Spain-based Eugin IVF unit.

Reuters reported in June that the administrators of NMC have
selected Perella Weinberg Partners to advise on the sale.

"We're just going through round one now. Some of those people will
drop off on their own and some of them will shortlist based on
their ability to raise funds and their knowledge of the portfolio
and the business," Reuters quotes Mr. Davis as saying.

"This is not a fire sale.  We're not relinquishing these businesses
at a discount," he said, adding the underlying businesses of NMC
are strong.

The administrators are also weighing the sale of UK-based hospital
operator Aspen, but a formal process is yet to begin, Reuters
notes.

Mr. Davis, as cited by Reuters, said his preference would be for
the core businesses of NMC, which is UAE's biggest private hospital
operator, to remain intact.

NMC's difficulties amid allegations of fraud and the disclosure of
more than US$4 billion in hidden debt has left some UAE and
overseas lenders with heavy losses and prompted legal battles to
try and recover money owed, Reuters discloses.


RESTAURANT GROUP: Firejacks Restaurant Won't Be Reopening
---------------------------------------------------------
David Holmes at CheshireLive reports that Firejacks restaurant in
Chester city centre won't be reopening following its closure during
lockdown.

Owners The Restaurant Group are restructuring part of its business
through an insolvency procedure known as a company voluntary
arrangement (CVA), CheshireLive notes.

It's now been confirmed that Firejacks, which was rebranded from a
Coast to Coast outlet, will remain permanently closed, CheshireLive
discloses.

According to CheshireLive, a company spokesman said: "The casual
dining sector has faced enormous, well documented pressures which
have been exacerbated by Covid-19 and the lockdown.  Unfortunately,
we have had to take difficult but necessary decisions to ensure a
sustainable future for our business.

"We have been in close contact with affected colleagues throughout
this process and we are doing all we can to support them during
this time."

The Restaurant Group is one of the largest operators in the country
but has been forced to shut sites across its brands such as
Garfunkel's and Chiquito as well as Frankie and Benny's including
its Greyhound Retail Park outlet, CheshireLive states.


SEQUENCE FINANCIAL: Goes Into Administration, Halts Trading
-----------------------------------------------------------
Business Sale reports that Sequence Financial Management has ceased
trading and entered administration.

Andrew Poxon and Mike Dillon of the Manchester office of business
recovery firm Leonard Curtis have been appointed as joint
administrators for the company, Business Sale relates.  According
to Business Sale, in a statement, the joint administrators said
that they had been appointed on Aug. 12 and that SFM had ceased
trading prior to their appointment.

The joint administrators added that all enquiries relating to the
administration should be forwarded to Leonard Curtis' Riverside
House office in Manchester, Business Sale notes.

The company's most recent accounts filed at Companies House were
made up to the year ending September 30 2019, Business Sale states.
According to those accounts, SFM employed around 12 staff.

SFM's total assets less liabilities were valued at GBP379,246, down
from GBP422,370 in 2018, while its net assets amounted to
GBP224,451, down from close to GBP250,000, Business Sale
discloses.

The Northwich, Cheshire-based wealth management firm specialized in
pensions and investment and offered services ranging from financial
planning to wealth management, corporate advice and pension reviews
to private and corporate clients.


VALARIS PLC: Moody's Cuts PDR to D-PD on Bankruptcy Filing
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Valaris plc's Corporate Family
Rating to Ca from Caa3, Probability of Default Rating to D-PD from
Caa3-PD/LD, senior unsecured notes to C from Ca, and Speculative
Grade Liquidity Rating to SGL-4 from SGL-3. The rating outlook
remains negative.

These actions follow the company's bankruptcy filing on August 19,
2020.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Valaris plc

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to D-PD from Caa3-PD /LD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-4 from SGL-3

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Ca from Caa3

Senior Unsecured Notes, Downgraded to C (LGD4) from Ca (LGD4)

Issuer: ENSCO International Incorporated

Senior Unsecured Notes, Downgraded to C (LGD4) from Ca (LGD4)

Issuer: Pride International, Inc.

Senior Unsecured Notes, Downgraded to C (LGD4) from Ca (LGD4)

Issuer: Rowan Companies, Inc.

Senior Unsecured Notes, Downgraded to C (LGD4) from Ca (LGD4)

Affirmations:

Issuer: Valaris plc

Senior Unsecured Commercial Paper (Foreign Currency), Affirmed NP

Unchanged:

Issuer: Valaris plc

Outlook, Remains Negative

Issuer: ENSCO International Incorporated

Outlook, Remains Negative

Issuer: Pride International, Inc.

Outlook, Remains Negative

Issuer: Rowan Companies, Inc.

Outlook, Remains Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ca CFR and C notes rating reflect Moody's view on expected
recoveries.

Shortly after its rating action, Moody's will withdraw all of
Valaris' ratings, and no changes to the ratings are expected prior
to the withdrawal.

Valaris plc is headquartered in London, UK and is one of the
world's largest providers of offshore contract drilling services to
the oil and gas industry.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global Oilfield
Services Industry Rating Methodology published in May 2017.

WOODFORD EQUITY: Investors to Share in GBP183MM Capital Return
--------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Smith at The Financial Times reports that more than 300,000
investors still stuck in Neil Woodford's equity income fund are to
share in a GBP183 million capital distribution in the coming days,
according to Link Fund Solutions, the fund's administrator.

According to the FT, combined with a GBP143 million distribution
made in March, and GBP2.12 billion paid out in January, investors
will have had GBP2.45 billion of their money returned since the
fund was put into liquidation last year.

Mr. Woodford's equity income fund was suspended in June last year,
having shrunk to GBP3.7 billion after years of weak investment
performance and an exodus of investors, the FT recounts.

Following this latest distribution to investors, the size of the
defunct fund has now shrunk to less than GBP290 million, the FT
states.  Laura Suter, personal finance analyst at investment
platform AJ Bell, said selling the remaining assets in the fund
would be difficult, the FT notes.

"There's no mention of a timeline or any progress having been made
on the sale of the assets, with Link just saying the sale 'may take
some time'," the FT quotes Ms. Suter as saying.  "This means the
process will drag on for even longer for investors, who just want
to get as much of their money back as possible and move on from the
sorry saga."

Link also announced that publication of the fund's annual accounts
would be delayed by about a month, the FT discloses.

According to the FT, Link said on Aug. 20 it remained in "regular
discussions" with Grant Thornton, the fund's auditor.




===============
X X X X X X X X
===============

[*] BOOK REVIEW: Mentor X
-------------------------
The Life-Changing Power of Extraordinary Mentors
Author: Stephanie Wickouski
Publisher: Beard Books
Hard cover: 156 pages
ISBN: 978-1-58798-700-7
List Price: $24.75

Order this Book: https://is.gd/EIPwnq

Long-time bankruptcy lawyer Stephanie Wickouski at Bryan Cave
impressively tackles a soft problem of modern professionals in an
era of hard data and scientific intervention in her third published
book entitled Mentor X. In an age where employee productivity is
measured by artificial intelligence and resumes are prescreened by
computers, Stephanie Wickouski adds spirit and humanity to the
professional journey.

The title is disarmingly deceptive and book browsers could be
excused for assuming this work is just another in a long line of
homogeneous efforts on mentorship. Don't be fooled; Mentor X is
practical, articulate and lively. Most refreshingly, the book
acknowledges the most important element of human development: our
intuition.

Mrs. Wickouski starts by describing what a mentor is and
distinguishes that role from a teacher, coach, role model, buddy or
boss. Younger professionals may be skeptical of the need for a
mentor, but Mrs. Wickouski deftly disabuses that notion by relating
how a mentor may do nothing less than change the course of a
protege's life. Newbies to this genre need little convincing
afterwards.

One of the book's worthiest contributions is a definition of mentor
that will surprise most readers. Mentors are not teachers, the
latter of which impart practical knowledge. Instead, according to
Mrs. Wickouski, her mentors "showed me secrets that I could learn
nowhere else. They showed me how doors are opened. They showed me
how to be an agent of change and advance innovative and
controversial ideas." What ambitious professional doesn't want more
of that in their life?

The practicality of the book continues as Mrs. Wickouski outlines
the qualities to look for in a mentor and classifies the various
types of mentors, including bold mentors, charismatic mentors, cold
and distant mentors, dissolute mentors, personally bonded mentors,
younger mentors, and unexpected mentors. Mentor X includes charts
and workbooks which aid the reader in getting the most out of a
mentor relationship. In a later chapter, Mrs. Wickouski provides an
enormously helpful suggestion about adopting a mentor: keep an open
mind. Often, mentors will come in packages that differ from our
expectations. They may be outside of our profession, younger, less
educated, etc . . . but the world works in mysterious ways and Mrs.
Wickouski encourages readers to think about mentors broadly.  In
this modern era of heightened workplace ethics, Mrs. Wickouski
articulates the dark side of mentors. She warns about "dementors"
and "tormentors"--false mentors providing dubious and sometimes
self-destructive advice, and those who abuse a mentor relationship
to further self-interested, malign ends, respectively. She
describes other mentor dysfunctions, namely boundary-crossing,
rivalry, corruption, and a few others. When a mentor manifests such
behaviors, Mrs. Wickouski counsels it's time to end the
relationship.

Mrs. Wickouski tells readers how to discern when the mentor
relationship is changing and when it is effectively over. Those
changes can be precipitated by romantic boundaries crossed,
emergence of rivalrous sentiment, or encouragement of unethical
behavior or corruption. Mrs. Wickouski aptly notes that once
insidious energies emerge, the mentorship is effectively over. At
this point, certain readers may say to themselves, "Okay, I've got
it. Now I can move on." Or, "My workplace has a formal mentorship
program. I don't need this book anymore." Or even, "Can't modern
technology handle my mentor needs, a Tinder of mentorship, so to
speak?"

Mrs. Wickouski refutes that notion. She analyzes how many mentoring
programs miss the mark. In one of the best passages in the book,
Mrs. Wickouski writes, "Assigning or brokering mentors negates the
most critical components of a true mentor–protege relationship:
the individual process of self-awareness which leads a person to
recognize another individual who will give the advice singularly
needed. That very process is undermined by having a mentor assigned
or by going to a mentoring party." She does not just criticize; she
offers a solution with three valuable tips for choosing the right
mentor and five qualities to ascertain a true mentor in the
unlimited sea of possibilities.

Next, Mrs. Wickouski distinguishes between good advice and bad
advice. She punctuates that discussion with many relevant and
relatable examples that are easy to read and colorfully enjoyable.
This section includes interviews with proteges who have had
successful mentorships. The punchline: in the best mentorships, the
parties harmoniously share personal beliefs and values. Also
important, the protege draws inspiration and motivation from the
mentor. The book winds down as usefully as it started: Mrs.
Wickouski interviews proteges, asking them what they would have
done differently with their mentors if they could turn back the
clock. A common thread seems to be that the proteges would have
gone deeper with their mentors--they would have asked more
questions, spent more time, delved into their mentors' thinking in
greater depth.

The book wraps up lightly by sharing useful and practical
suggestions for maintenance of the mentor relationship. She answers
questions such as, "Do I invite my mentor to my wedding?" and "Who
pays for lunch?"

Mentor X is an enjoyable read and a useful book for any
professional in any industry at, frankly, any point in time.
Advanced individuals will learn much from the other side, i.e., how
to be more effective mentors. Mrs. Wickouski does a wonderful job
of encouraging use of that all knowing aspect of human existence
which never fails us: proper use of our intuition.

                         About The Author

Stephanie Wickouski is widely regarded as an innovator and
strategic advisor. A nationally recognized lawyer, she has been
named as one of the 12 Outstanding Restructuring Lawyers in the US
by Turnarounds & Workouts and as one of US News' Best Lawyers in
America. She is the author of two other books: Indenture Trustee
Bankruptcy Powers & Duties, an essential guide to the legal role of
the bond trustee, and Bankruptcy Crimes, an authoritative resource
on bankruptcy fraud. She also writes the Corporate Restructuring
blog.



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2020.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *