/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/190710.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                          E U R O P E

          Wednesday, July 10, 2019, Vol. 20, No. 137

                           Headlines



D E N M A R K

DKT HOLDINGS: Fitch Lowers LongTerm IDR to B+, Outlook Stable


F R A N C E

RALLYE SA: Societe Generale Can Call in Collateral, Court Rules


G E R M A N Y

STEINHOFF INT'L: Provides June Update on Financial Restructuring


I R E L A N D

AQUEDUCT EUROPEAN 4: Fitch Assigns B-sf Rating on Class F Debt
AQUEDUCT EUROPEAN 4: Moody's Rates EUR11.8MM Class F Notes 'B2'


L U X E M B O U R G

EP BCO: Fitch Assigns BB- LT Issuer Default Rating, Outlook Stable


N E T H E R L A N D S

TIKEHAU CLO II: Fitch Rates EUR10MM Class F Notes 'B-'
TIKEHAU CLO II: Moody's Affirms B2 Rating on EUR10MM Class F Notes


S P A I N

FCC AQUALIA: Fitch Affirms BB+ LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
GRANADA HIPOTECARIO 1: Fitch Affirms CCCsf Rating on Class B Debt


U N I T E D   K I N G D O M

BURY FC: Creditors Seek More Time to Consider Rescue Plan
DEBENHAMS PLC: Calls on Mike Ashley to Drop CVA Challenge
MONSOON ACCESSORIZE: Announces 50 Redundancies After CVA Approval
RJD FABRICATIONS: Enters Administration Amid Financial Woes
[*] UK: Must Leave Under Clean Brexit or Face EUR200BB Bailout


                           - - - - -


=============
D E N M A R K
=============

DKT HOLDINGS: Fitch Lowers LongTerm IDR to B+, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded DKT Holdings ApS, the owner of Danish
telecoms company TDC A/S, to Long-Term Issuer Default Rating 'B+'
from 'BB-'. The Outlook on the IDR is Stable. Fitch has also
upgraded TDC's senior secured debt ratings.

The downgrade reflects its view that the company's strategy to
increase network investment and to separate TDC into two operating
subsidiaries will increase capex and operating expenses. Fitch
expects this will increase DKT's leverage to a level sustainably
higher than its downgrade threshold for a 'BB-' rating. Its base
case envisages funds from operations (FFO) adjusted net leverage to
stabilise at around 6.2x-6.3x in 2020-2022. This high leverage,
taken into consideration with the strong operating profile of an
incumbent telecoms operator, is more consistent with a 'B+'
rating.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Higher Capex and Leverage: Fitch forecasts DKT's Fitch-defined FFO
lease-adjusted net leverage to rise to 5.8x by end-2019 and to
remain at around 6.2x-6.3x in 2020-2022. DKT plans to invest more
on its FTTH and 5G network, and develop its TV platform. Fitch
expects this higher capex starting in 2019 to continue over the
next four years. The demerger of TDC into two operating
subsidiaries (a NetCo focused on operating its fixed and mobile
networks and an OpCo focusing on delivering customer experience)
should also contribute to higher operational expenses and capex in
2019-2020. However, Fitch believes DKT has a strong ability to
manage its leverage via flexible dividends and phasing of its capex
programme.

Fibre Network Investment: DKT's strategy to increase fibre network
investment and FTTH coverage, in Fitch's view, should help to
address growing demand for high-speed broadband connectivity and
place DKT in a better competitive position relative to its
infrastructure competitors. Fitch believes DKT is likely to focus
its FTTH investments initially in areas where it has a fixed
broadband market share, but where there is little alternative fibre
deployment.

In Denmark, FTTH network has been predominantly deployed and is
owned by local utility companies. They have passed 1.2 million
homes with fibre, which covers half of the country's households.
Where fibre connections are not available, consumers rely on
upgraded cable networks or TDC's copper-based network for their
broadband service.

Competitive Market: The mature Danish telecom market remains
competitive with limited subscriber growth potential. DKT's 1Q19
results show some signs of stabilisation. Its business segment has
delivered for the first time revenue growth of 0.9% yoy, reversing
high single-digit declines in past years. The consumer segment's
revenue dipped 0.2%. Based on DKT's solid market position as the
incumbent operator in Denmark, Fitch expects overall revenue growth
to turn positive starting from 2021.

NetCo-OpCo Legal Separation: The legal separation of OpCo and NetCo
has now been completed with these two business units transferred to
100%-owned TDC subsidiaries, Nuuday A/S and TDC NetCo A/S
respectively. This demerger is still partial as certain headquarter
functions and the primary part of TDC's external debt financing
still remain at TDC. Fitch does not expect a full operational
separation to be completed before 2021-2022 as complex issues,
including IT systems, are still being worked through. However,
changes to the security and guarantee package for the senior
secured debt issued by TDC have now been put in place, in line with
terms outlined during TDC's term loan B (TLB) euro tranche
repricing in November 2018.

Instrument Ratings Change: Fitch has updated its ratings on DKT's
instrument ratings, as Fitch now has further clarity on the impact
of TDC's planned network separation, with the legal separation
being the first step.

TDC's Senior Secured Upgraded: Recovery prospects for the debt
issued by TDC remain good, even though Fitch expects 2019 EBITDA to
be lower than 2018's. With the legal separation complete, the TLB
(senior secured facilities issued by TDC) now has significant
security advantages over TDC's senior unsecured notes. This
includes the share pledge over TDC and its two new subsidiaries,
TDC NetCo A/S and Nuuday A/S, as well as guarantees from the two
new subsidiaries and TDC's immediate parent, DK Telekommunikation
ApS. Therefore Fitch has upgraded TDC's senior secured instrument
rating to 'BB+'/'RR1'/100%.

TDC's Senior Unsecured Upgraded: Recovery prospects for TDC's
senior unsecured noteholders are also good. While these noteholders
do not benefit from any guarantee or security package, TDC's two
new subsidiaries, due to the demerger under Danish law, will be
liable on a statutory basis to satisfy existing noteholders' claims
if TDC defaults on these notes. These notes mature in 2022 and
2023, before the TLB is due in 2025. Therefore Fitch has upgraded
TDC's senior unsecured instrument rating to 'BB'/'RR2'/90%.

DKT Holdco Rating Downgraded: The debt issued by DKT Finance ApS, a
holding company that ultimately owns TDC, is structurally
subordinated to the debt issued by TDC. Underlying recovery of the
instrument remains weak given a substantial amount of prior-ranking
debt totalling over 2x EBITDA. Hence Fitch doeswngraded the rating
of the notes by DKT to 'B-'/'RR6'/10%, following DKT's IDR
downgrade.

No Impact from IFRS 16 Adoption: Its leverage metrics under its
current methodology do not factor in the transition to IFRS16
accounting standards. Fitch continues to treat operating lease
payments as part of operating costs and capitalise them for its
total adjusted debt calculation.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

DKT's ratings reflect the company's leading position within the
Danish telecoms market. The company has strong in-market scale and
market shares that span both fixed and mobile segments. Ownership
of both cable and copper-based local access network infrastructure
partly reduces the company's operating risk profile, even though
TDC faces network competition from FTTH fibres deployed by Danish
electricity companies in parts of the country. Domestic European
incumbent peers typically face infrastructure-based competition
from cable network operators.

DKT is rated lower than other peer incumbents, such as Royal KPN
N.V (BBB/Stable), due to notably higher leverage, which puts it
more in line with cable operators with similarly high leverage,
such as VodafoneZiggo Group B.V. (B+/Stable), Unitymedia GmbH
(B+/RWP), Telenet Group Holding N.V. (BB-/Stable) and Virgin Media
Inc. (BB-/Stable). TDC's incumbent status, leading positions in
both fixed and mobile markets, and unique infrastructure ownership
justify higher leverage thresholds than cable peers.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions within its Rating Case for the Issuer

   - Slightly declining revenue in 2019 and 2020, before
     stabilising and growing in the following two years

   - EBITDA margin of around 36%-37% in 2019-2020, reflecting
     investment in FTTH rollout as well as TV content costs.
     Improvement starts from 2021 onwards

   - Capex (excluding spectrum) of around 26% of revenue in
     2019-2020 before declining in 2021-2022

   - Dividends of around DKK800 million per year

   - Capex and dividend policy to keep leverage high but at
     stable levels after 2020

KEY RECOVERY RATING ASSUMPTIONS

   - The recovery analysis assumes that the company would be
     considered a going concern in bankruptcy and that it would
     be reorganised rather than liquidated

   - A 10% administrative claim

   - Its going-concern EBITDA estimate of DKK5 billion reflects
     Fitch's view of a sustainable, post-reorganisation EBITDA
     level upon which Fitch bases the valuation of the company

   - Its going-concern EBITDA estimate is 20% below its 2019
     forecast EBITDA, which taking into account the operational
     expenses related to demerger in 2019.

   - An enterprise value (EV) multiple of 6x is used to calculate
     a post-reorganisation valuation and reflects a distressed
     multiple. The multiple reflects TDC's incumbent position in
     Denmark and is also in line with that used for large European
     cable operators like VodafoneZiggo and Unitymedia, which
     also have solid market position and own signify cant network
     assets

   - Fitch estimates the total amount of debt for claims at
     EUR4.9 billion (DKK36.4 billion), which includes debt
     instruments at the OpCo and HoldCo levels, as well as full
     drawings on available credit facilities, comprising EUR500
     million facilities at TDC and a EUR100 million revolving
     credit facility (RCF) at DKT.




===========
F R A N C E
===========

RALLYE SA: Societe Generale Can Call in Collateral, Court Rules
---------------------------------------------------------------
Harriet Agnew at The Financial Times report that a French
commercial court has ruled that Societe Generale can call in the
collateral it owns in Rallye SA, the parent company of French
retailer Casino, handing a setback to the group's controlling
shareholder Jean-Charles Naouri, who is trying to restructure the
highly-indebted group.

In May, Casino's parent companies Rallye, Finantis and Fonciere
Euris entered into a "procedure de sauvegarde" -- a court-led
creditor protection process available to solvent companies in
financial distress, the FT recounts.  This allows them to freeze
their debt for up to three periods of six months each, the FT
notes.

The court document said after the "procedure de sauvegarde" was
opened, Fonciere Euris sought to prevent SocGen from calling in the
collateral it holds on these Rallye shares as part of the
derivatives transaction, the FT relates.  It said this was approved
by a court on May 29, according to the FT.

However, the latest ruling, dated July 4, as cited by the FT, said:
"We challenge Fonciere Euris's request that Societe Generale be
prohibited from collateralizing the 1,770,000 of Rallye in
execution of the contract as of December 12, 2014, and we will
immediately lift the ban on Societe Generale" as it relates to the
ruling of May 29.

If SocGen exercises its right to the collateralized Rallye shares,
this would dilute Fonciere Euris's stake in Rallye, the FT states.
Fonciere Euris is dependent on the dividends it receives from
Rallye to service its own debt, the FT discloses.

                  About Rallye SA

France-based Rallye S.A., together with its subsidiaries, engages
in the food, non-food e-commerce, and sporting goods retailing
activities in France and internationally.  It operates
hypermarkets, supermarkets, and discount stores. The company
conducts its retailing activities in France primarily under the
Casino, Monoprix, Franprix-Leader Price, and Vindemia banners; food
retail activities in Latin America primarily under the Exito,
Disco, Devoto, and Libertad banners, as well as GPA food banner;
and e-commerce comprising Cdiscount and the Cnova N.V. holding
company businesses.  

The Company was placed under creditors' protection by a Paris court
on May 23, 2019.  At the time of its collapse, the Company was said
to be saddled with a EUR2.9 billion debt.




=============
G E R M A N Y
=============

STEINHOFF INT'L: Provides June Update on Financial Restructuring
----------------------------------------------------------------
Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. together with its
subsidiaries provided a monthly update on progress in connection
with the corporate and capital restructuring of the Group's
European business in accordance with the Company's reporting
obligations under paragraph (e) of clause 20 of the lock-up
agreement between, among others, the Company, Steinhoff Europe AG
("SEAG"), Steinhoff Finance Holding GmbH ("SFHG"), Stripes US
Holding, Inc. ("SUSHI") and certain creditors, dated July 11, 2018
(the "LUA").

The Company noted that the report should be read in conjunction
with recent market announcements (available at
www.steinhoffinternational.com/sens.php), including the most recent
monthly update issued on May 31, 2019 (the "May Update").

* CVA Consent Request No. 4 - extension to CVA Long-Stop Date and
internal reorganization

On June 20, 2019, following discussions between the Company,
advisers to the SEAG Creditors Group and advisers to the SFHG
Creditors Group, the Company launched CVA Consent Request No. 4.
CVA Consent Request No. 4 was approved by the requisite majorities
of SEAG and SFHG creditors on June 28, 2019.

In summary, CVA Consent Request No. 4 included an extension to the
CVA Long-Stop Date to 5:00 pm (London time) on August 9, 2019, and
certain amendments and modifications to the SEAG CVA, the SFHG CVA
and certain Restructuring Documents to accommodate the commencement
of an internal reorganization within the SEAG cluster prior to the
closing of the Restructuring (i.e. the Restructuring Effective
Date) as well as the waiver of an Implementation Condition related
to a certain tax clearance in the state of Victoria in Australia.

As a consequence of amending the CVA Long-Stop Date, the Long-Stop
Date pursuant to the Lock-Up Agreement has also been amended to be
the same as the amended CVA Long-Stop Date (i.e. 5:00pm (London
time) on August 9, 2019).

In relation to CVA Consent Request No. 4 certain members of the
SEAG Creditors Group and the SFHG Creditors Group requested for
future extension fee arrangements to be agreed as part of the
consents to CVA Consent Request No. 4.  Further details of the
agreement to which the Company, SEAG and SFHG consented is
available at: www.lucid-is.com/steinhoff

Preparation for the internal reorganization within the SEAG cluster
has commenced and it is currently expected that this extension to
the CVA Long-Stop Date under the CVAs will provide sufficient time
to complete the relevant reorganization steps that are required to
be undertaken prior to the closing of the Restructuring and to
complete any other necessary outstanding matters prior to the
Implementation Notice Date.  It is also expected that once the
Implementation Conditions Notice is issued, the closing of the
Restructuring will occur approximately 20 Business Days later.

The objective of the Group remains to complete the restructuring as
soon as possible and ahead of the new CVA Long-Stop Date.

* Implementation Conditions Notice and Entitlement Process

As reported in the May Update (and following receipt of the
requisite consent to CVA Consent Request No. 4), the remaining
outstanding Implementation Conditions (as detailed in the SEAG CVA
and SFHG CVA (as applicable)) continue to be assessed.

Once the Implementation Conditions have been satisfied or waived
(or SEAG or SFHG (as applicable) considers that such Implementation
Conditions are capable of being satisfied or will be waived prior
to the Implementation Commencement Date), SEAG and SFHG will issue
the Implementation Conditions Notice which will commence the next
stage of the Restructuring.

The Implementation Conditions Notice will also commence the
entitlement process and will set the deadline (the Participation
Deadline) by which relevant CVA Creditors and SFHG Creditors must
submit their Entitlement Letters in order to be eligible to receive
their entitlements under the New Lux Finco 2 Loans and/or New Lux
Finco 1 Loans (as applicable), and the date at which the exchange
rate for conversion of non-Euro amounts into Euro amounts for the
purpose of calculating Final Entitlements will be set.  Further
information in relation to the entitlement process will be detailed
in the Implementation Conditions Notice (which will be available at
www.lucid-is.com/steinhoff).

As detailed in the SEAG CVA and the SFHG CVA, following the
Participation Deadline, the Information Agent (Lucid Issuer
Services Limited) will have a prescribed period to calculate Final
Entitlements based on information received from SEAG, SFHG and from
creditors, including information received pursuant to the
entitlement process.  SEAG and SFHG continue to work with the
Information Agent and the Group's Financial Advisers to prepare for
the entitlement and allocation process.

Please refer to the May Update for information regarding how
creditors' eligibility to receive fees under the Lock-Up Agreement
and Support Letters will be reconciled and verified, as well as KYC
requirements.  This includes details of action that may need to be
taken by creditors and brokers, to the extent not already done so.

* Lock-Up Agreement Consent No. 10 and Consent No. 11

As described in the May Update, on May 29, 2019, the Company
launched a request under the Lock-Up Agreement (Consent Request No.
10) relating to matters which needed to be resolved prior to the
conclusion of the Restructuring pursuant to the SEAG CVA and the
SFHG CVA.  Lock-Up Agreement Consent No. 10 was approved by the
requisite majorities of SEAG and SFHG creditors on June 6, 2019.

On June 6, 2019, the Company launched a further request under the
Lock-Up Agreement (Consent Request No. 11) relating to the
refinancing of the existing credit facilities of Pepkor Europe
Limited and its subsidiaries (the "Pepkor Refinancing").  Lock-Up
Agreement Consent No. 11 was approved by the requisite majorities
of SEAG and SFHG creditor on June 10, 2019.

* Head office liquidity

The Company continues to actively monitor cash flows and manage
other liabilities (including contingent claims, tax and bilateral
facilities) as well as funding needs that may arise at the
subsidiary level.

* Litigation

On June 19, 2019, the Company launched proceedings against former
CEO Markus Jooste and former CFO Ben La Grange in the Cape Town
High Court, South Africa to recover certain salary and bonus
payments paid to the former CEO and CFO prior to 2017.

On June 21, 2019, the Company received a writ of summons from
Barents & Krans on behalf of Hamilton B.V. ('Hamilton').  This writ
of summons initiates legal proceedings against the Company and
others for declaratory relief relating to currently unquantified
damages arising from alleged wrongful acts.  The Company and
Hamilton have agreed that no procedural act would be due from the
Company until later in the year.

* Financial statements

On June 18, 2019, the Company published its audited Annual Report,
including the Consolidated Financial Statements, for the year ended
30 September 2018; this is available on the Company's website
http://steinhoffinternational.com/.

The unaudited 2019 half-year interim results are scheduled for
release on July 12, 2019.  The Group intends to host an Investor
Presentation subsequent to that release -- further details in this
regard will be provided once the interim results have been
published.

* Update on Group Governance

As previously reported, the onboarding process between the Group
and the nominees identified for the Newco 3 board and the boards of
the key intermediate holding companies (in addition to the two
directors nominated by the Company, Louis du Preez and Theodore de
Klerk) in the SEAG group is ongoing. The Group expects to announce
the candidates publicly prior to the Restructuring Effective Date.

* Current management priorities

The key priorities for the management team currently include:

   -- Undertaking the internal reorganization, determining the date
on which to launch the Implementation Conditions Notice and
finalizing the remaining outstanding Implementation Conditions and
the final implementation steps in order to complete the
Restructuring;

   -- Finalization of arrangements to appoint the nominees of the
new management boards within the SEAG group;

   -- Maintaining stability across the Group and managing the
ongoing operations of the Group, including actively monitoring cash
flows, supporting operating performance, managing other liabilities
and funding needs that arise at the operating company level;

   -- Continuing to consider the contents of the PwC report and to
progressing various actions as appropriate together with the roll
out of the Remediation Plan;

   -- Monitoring and defending any litigation claims brought
against the Group and identifying and pursuing recoveries where
available; and

   -- Engaging with the wider stakeholder group and regulators.

Shareholders and other investors in the Company are advised to
exercise caution when dealing in the securities of the Group.

Steinhoff International Holdings NV is a South African
international retail holding company that is dual listed in
Germany. Steinhoff deals mainly in furniture and household goods,
and operates in Europe, Africa, Asia, the United States, Australia
and New Zealand.




=============
I R E L A N D
=============

AQUEDUCT EUROPEAN 4: Fitch Assigns B-sf Rating on Class F Debt
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Aqueduct European CLO 4 - 2019 DAC final
ratings.

Aqueduct European CLO 4 -2019 DAC is a cash flow collateralised
loan obligation. It comprises primarily European senior secured
obligations (at least 90%) with a component of corporate rescue
loans, senior unsecured, second-lien loans, mezzanine and high
yield bonds. Net proceeds from the issuance of the notes are being
used to purchase a portfolio with a target par of EUR400 million.
The portfolio is managed by HPS Investment Partners CLO (UK) LLP.
The CLO envisages a 4.5-year reinvestment period and an 8.5-year
weighted average life.

Aqueduct European CLO 4-2019 DAC

Class A;   LT AAAsf  New Rating;  AAA(EXP)sf
Class B-1; LT AAsf   New Rating;  AA(EXP)sf
Class B-2; LT AAsf   New Rating;  AA(EXP)sf
Class C;   LT Asf    New Rating;  A(EXP)sf
Class D;   LT BBB-sf New Rating;  BBB-(EXP)sf
Class E;   LT BBsf   New Rating;  BB(EXP)sf
Class F;   LT B-sf   New Rating;  B-(EXP)sf
Class M-1; LT NRsf   New Rating;  NR(EXP)sf
Class M-2; LT NRsf   New Rating;  NR(EXP)sf
Class M-3; LT NRsf   New Rating;  NR(EXP)sf
Class X;   LT AAAsf  New Rating;  AAA(EXP)sf

KEY RATING DRIVERS

'B+'/'B' Portfolio Credit Quality

Fitch places the average credit quality of obligors in the 'B+'/'B'
range. The Fitch-weighted average rating factor (WARF) of the
identified portfolio is 32.3.

High Recovery Expectations

At least 96% of the portfolio comprises senior secured obligations.
Fitch views the recovery prospects for these assets as more
favourable than for second-lien, unsecured and mezzanine assets.
The Fitch-weighted average recovery rate (WARR) of the identified
portfolio is 65.7%.

Limit on Concentration Risk

The transaction has different Fitch test matrices with different
allowances for exposure to both the 10 largest obligors and and
fixed-rate assets. The manager can interpolate between these
matrices.The transaction also includes limits on maximum industry
exposure based on Fitch's industry definitions with the maximum
exposure to the three-largest (Fitch-defined) industries in the
portfolio covenanted at 40%. These covenants ensure that the asset
portfolio will not be exposed to excessive concentration.

Adverse Selection and Portfolio Management

The transaction features a 4.5-year reinvestment period and
includes reinvestment criteria similar to other European
transactions. Fitch's analysis is based on a stressed-case
portfolio with the aim of testing the robustness of the transaction
structure against its covenants and portfolio guidelines.

Cash Flow Analysis

Fitch used a customised proprietary cash flow model to replicate
the principal and interest waterfalls, and the various structural
features of the transaction. Fitch also used this model to assess
their effectiveness, including the structural protection provided
by excess spread diverted through the par value and interest
coverage tests.

Limited Interest Rate Risk

Up to 10% of the portfolio can be invested in fixed-rate assets,
while fixed-rate liabilities represent 3.75% of the target par.
Fitch modeled both 0% and 10% fixed-rate buckets and found that the
rated notes can withstand the interest rate mismatch associated
with each scenario.


AQUEDUCT EUROPEAN 4: Moody's Rates EUR11.8MM Class F Notes 'B2'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has assigned the
following definitive ratings to the notes issued by Aqueduct
European CLO 4 - 2019 Designated Activity Company:

EUR2,000,000 Class X Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2032,
Assigned Aaa (sf)

EUR244,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2032,
Assigned Aaa (sf)

EUR30,000,000 Class B-1 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2032, Assigned Aa2 (sf)

EUR15,000,000 Class B-2 Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes due 2032,
Assigned Aa2 (sf)

EUR23,300,000 Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2032, Assigned A2 (sf)

EUR26,000,000 Class D Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2032, Assigned Baa3 (sf)

EUR20,000,000 Class E Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2032, Assigned Ba2 (sf)

EUR11,800,000 Class F Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2032, Assigned B2 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on a consideration of the
risks associated with the CLO's portfolio and structure as
described in its methodology.

The Issuer is a managed cash flow CLO. At least 90% of the
portfolio must consist of senior secured obligations and up to 10%
of the portfolio may consist of senior unsecured obligations,
second-lien loans, mezzanine obligations and high yield bonds. The
portfolio is expected to be 70-80% ramped up as of the closing date
and comprises predominantly corporate loans to obligors domiciled
in Western Europe. The remainder of the portfolio will be acquired
during the 6 month ramp-up period in compliance with the portfolio
guidelines.

HPS Investment Partners CLO (UK) LLP will manage the CLO. It will
direct the selection, acquisition and disposition of collateral on
behalf of the Issuer and may engage in trading activity, including
discretionary trading, during the transaction's four and a
half-year reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to certain
restrictions, purchases are permitted using principal proceeds from
unscheduled principal payments and proceeds from sales of credit
risk obligations or credit improved obligations.

Interest and principal amortisation amounts due to the Class X
Notes are paid pro rata with payments to the Class A Notes. The
Class X Notes amortise by EUR 250,000 over 8 payment dates starting
on the 2nd payment date.

In addition to the eight classes of notes rated by Moody's, the
Issuer issued EUR 16.5m M-1 subordinated notes, EUR 18.6m M-2
subordinated notes and EUR 0.1m M-3 subordinated notes, which are
not rated. To the extent M-2 and M-3 subordinated notes are held by
affiliates of HPS Investment Partners CLO (UK) LLP, these notes
will accrue interest in the amount of the senior and subordinated
management fee which would have otherwise been paid to the
collateral manager.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Methodology underlying the rating action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
March 2019.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

The rated notes' performance is subject to uncertainty. The notes'
performance is sensitive to the performance of the underlying
portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and credit conditions
that may change. The collateral manager's investment decisions and
management of the transaction will also affect the notes'
performance.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3 of
the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in March 2019.

Moody's used the following base-case modeling assumptions:

Par Amount: EUR 400,000,000

Diversity Score: 44

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2901

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 3.65%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 4.50%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 44.30%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 8.5 years

Moody's has addressed the potential exposure to obligors domiciled
in countries with local currency ceiling (LCC) of A1 or below. As
per the portfolio constraints and eligibility criteria, exposures
to countries with LCC of A1 to A3 cannot exceed 10% and obligors
cannot be domiciled in countries with LCC below A3.




===================
L U X E M B O U R G
===================

EP BCO: Fitch Assigns BB- LT Issuer Default Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned EP BCo S.A. a Long-Term Issuer Default
Rating of 'BB-' with a Stable Outlook.

In addition, Fitch has assigned 'BB' ratings with Recovery Rating
'RR2' to the EUR315million first-lien term loan B and EUR30million
revolving credit facility; and 'B' rating with a Recovery Rating
'RR6' to the EUR105million second-lien facility, issued by EP.

EP is the financing vehicle and the sole shareholder of Euroports
Holdings Sarl, a large, deep-sea port terminal operator in Europe
and China.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Euroports' IDR reflects stable cash flows from its mature terminals
concentrated in the commodity sector and its deleveraging
expectations. Its long-standing relationships with a diversified
customer base mitigate limited visibility on future cash flow,
especially from terminals under development. Few of Euroports'
contracts guarantee revenue or volumes; however, Fitch expects
pricing to broadly track inflation. Its 2019-2023 capex plan is
large, self-funded and focused on well-identified projects
partially backed by long-term contracts.

Euroports' bullet debt structure entails refinancing risk in seven
to eight years, respectively, when each of the company's facilities
matures, especially if Euroports cannot renew its concessions in
the meantime. The current EBITDA-weighted average concessions tenor
of 18 years will decline to around 11 years at maturity of the
first lien term loan. However, Euroports has a record of extending
existing concessions. Under Fitch's rating case, the average
lease-adjusted gross leverage is 6.0x over 2019-2023, peaking at
7.4x in 2019.

The first and second liens have the same probability of default but
different recovery prospects of 'RR2' and 'RR6', respectively. As a
result, Fitch assigns a 'BB' rating to the first lien, notched up
once from the IDR of 'BB-', and a 'B' rating to the second lien,
notched down twice from the IDR. The RCF is rated in line with the
first lien as it is pari passu.

Diversified Portfolio of Commodity Terminals - Volume Risk:
Midrange

Euroports' portfolio of 15 terminal areas is strategically located
close to production and consumption centres and benefits from good
hinterland and multi-modal connectivity. The portfolio comprises
mature assets, such as the German and Finnish terminals, as well as
terminals with projects under development backed, in some cases, by
long-term contracts. Customer concentration is moderate as the top
20 clients accounted for around 50% of 2017 revenue.

Cargo is origin and destination (O&D) and concentrated in the
commodity sector. Euroports' three largest terminal areas (TA518,
Finnish Terminals, and Rostock), which represent around 60% of
consolidated operating EBITDA (OEBITDA), focus on pulp and forest
products, sugar and agri-bulk cargoes. Euroports plans to expand
throughput of minerals, metals, food and agri-products to tap
potential synergies with the international metal and minerals
activities of its main shareholder, Monaco Resources Group (MRG).

Euroports is targeting seven key industries, including fertiliser
and minerals, sugar, forest products, agri-bulk, metal and steel.
With the exception of coal and metals, commodities show a low
degree of correlation, hedging to some extent the volatility of
Euroports' volumes. Euroports' 2008-2009 volume peak-to-trough
decline, based on 2006-2016 key industry volume indices weighted by
Euroports' 2017 revenue, was high at 17%, but OEBITDA suffered a
milder decline of around 14%. Exposure to competition is generally
limited by Euroports' proximity to the port end-users and a lower
portion of standardised cargo volume than a port container
operator's.

Pricing Tracks Inflation - Price Risk: Midrange

Euroports has long-standing relationships with a diversified
customer base; its revenue- weighted average of customer contract
length is around 5.5 years, considering its top 25 customers.
However, take-or-pay clauses underpin only a small portion of
revenue. Revenue with global clients grew 19% in 2017 and 13% in
2016, due to additional services provided to the existing customer
base.

The terminal operator benefits from full price flexibility across
all regions; however, tariff increases tend to be limited by
contractual arrangements, generally indexed at inflation to varying
degrees.

Self-Funded Capex Plan - Infrastructure Development & Renewal:
Midrange

Euroports is well-equipped to deliver its investment programme
given its record of implementation of large maintenance and
expansionary investments on its network. Its 2019-2023 capex plan
is large, self-funded and focused on well-identified projects, such
as new warehouses, backed by long-term contracts with group clients
and short payback periods of up to six years.

Terminals under development, in particular Gaolan in China,
represent the majority of the expansionary capex. The capex will be
mostly rolled out in 2019-2020 and will materially reduce
thereafter. In Fitch's view, the high utilisation rates in some
terminal areas, especially on mature assets, reduce the capex
flexibility.

Refinance Risk and Floating-Rate Debt - Debt Structure: Weaker
Euroports' acquisition finance bullet debt is secured, exposed to
variable rates and looser covenants than a pure project finance
(PF) debt structure. The structure entails some protection against
re-leveraging risk, as the additional facility limit allows for
future taps only up to the net leverage at financial close, tested
at both the senior and second-lien levels. Excess cash flow sweep
and lock-up features are less protective than the typical PF
transactions, and Fitch does not assume any debt repayment until
the facilities mature.

The significant refinancing risk of the bullet structure weighs on
its assessment. The current weighted average concession life of 18
years will decrease to around 11 years at refinancing maturity of
the first-lien term loan. However, Euroports has a history of
extending concession tenors ahead of its legal maturity. In its
view, the first- and second-lien term loans share similar
probability of default, as second-lien creditors can undertake
enforcement actions upon an event of default, and collapse the
entire debt structure once that the standstill period lapses.

Key Recovery Assumptions

The recovery analysis assumes that Euroports would remain a going
concern in restructuring and that the company would be reorganised
rather than liquidated. Fitch has assumed a 10% administrative
claim in the recovery analysis.

  - The recovery analysis assumes a 20% discount to Euroports'
OEBITDA as of December 2018.

  - Fitch also assumes a distressed multiple of 6.5x and a fully
drawn EUR30 million RCF.

  - These assumptions result in a recovery rate for the first-lien
term loan and RCF within the 'RR2' range to allow a one-notch
uplift to the debt rating from the IDR. The recovery rate for the
second-lien term loan is within the 'RR6' range and leads to a
downward adjustment of two notches from the IDR.

Financial Profile

Under Fitch's rating case, lease-adjusted gross leverage averages
at 6.0x over the next five years, as a result of its lower traffic
assumptions, reduced margins on the logistic business, and haircuts
applied to expected synergies compared with the sponsor case.
OEBITDA growth from terminals currently under development is the
main driver of deleveraging, together with revenue and cost
synergies.

PEER GROUP

Fitch compares Euroports to Russian Global Ports Investment PLC
(GPI) and LLC DeloPorts (Delo) and Turkish Global Liman Isletmeleri
A.S (GPH) and Mersin Uluslararasi Liman Isletmeciligi A.S. (MIP).

GPI (BB/Stable) is larger than Euroports, has a dominant position
in its market, albeit with increasing competition, and less
concentrated cargo, as it operates a container business. Euroports
is more dependent on growth and exhibits higher leverage than GPI.


Deloports' (BB-/Stable) volumes, like those Euroports, are
concentrated on the commodity sector and a small number of
customers. Furthermore, it does not benefit from material
take-or-pay agreements and is undertaking a major expansionary
capex plan. Deloports is more exposed to competition and has a
weaker volume assessment, but is rated 'BB' on a consolidated basis
as its Fitch-adjusted net debt/EBITDAR below 3x is materially lower
than the 6x five-year average of Euroports.

GPH (senior unsecured: BB-/Stable) is rated in line with Euroports,
as the structural volatility of its two businesses, the cruise ship
segment and marble export to China, is offset by its 3.3x net
leverage, which is lower than Euroports'.

Mersin (senior unsecured: BB+/Negative) is rated higher than
Euroports because of its lower leverage of around 2.2x over the
next five years. Turkey's Country Ceiling caps Mersin's rating.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:

  - Projected Fitch-adjusted gross debt/EBITDAR above 6x on a
sustained basis from 2020

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:

  - Projected Fitch-adjusted gross debt/EBITDAR sustained below 5x
with commitment from both sponsor and management not to re-leverage


TRANSACTION SUMMARY

In February 2019, a consortium led by MRG, an international natural
resource group with a 53% stake, and including a Belgian Regional
(PMV) and Federal (SFPI-FPIM) Sovereign wealth funds, agreed to
acquire Euroports. EP BCo S.A. is the company issuing the term
loans to fund the acquisition.

Asset Description

Euroports is a large, deep-sea port terminal operator in
continental Europe with terminals spanning a diverse geographic
footprint, including operations in China. Operations are generally
based on long-term agreements and concessions with port authorities
or other public bodies, which entitle it to operate port terminals
and related facilities in the various ports in which it has a
presence. In addition to deep-sea terminals, Euroports operates a
number of inland river terminals and contract logistics sites.

Fitch Cases

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer:

  - 4.2% CAGR of revenue between 2018 and 2023

  - OEBITDA margin increasing to 13% by 2020

  - Capex in line with the sponsor case, just below EUR200 million
on a cumulative basis up to 2023

  - No dividends paid between 2018 and 2023

Criteria Variation

The analysis includes a variation from the "Rating Criteria for
Infrastructure and Project Finance", which excludes recovery
prospects given a default in instrument ratings.

The analysis under the "Rating Criteria for Infrastructure and
Project Finance" is assimilated with its assessment of recovery
prospects, which are key credit considerations in differentiating
between the first- and second-lien term loans. The loans have the
same probability of default but different recovery prospects. The
assigned Recovery Ratings were derived from the application of the
"Corporates Notching and Recovery Ratings Criteria" published in
March 2018 and the "Country-Specific Treatment of Recovery Ratings
Criteria" published in January 2019.



=====================
N E T H E R L A N D S
=====================

TIKEHAU CLO II: Fitch Rates EUR10MM Class F Notes 'B-'
------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Tikehau CLO II B.V.'s refinancing notes
final ratings, and affirmed the remaining notes as follows:

EUR244.0 million class A-R notes: assigned at 'AAAsf'; Outlook
Stable

EUR46.0 million class B notes affirmed at 'AAsf'; Outlook Stable

EUR 23.0 million class C-R notes: assigned at 'Asf'; Outlook
Stable

EUR18.0 million class D-R notes: assigned at 'BBBsf'; Outlook
Stable

EUR28.0 million class E notes affirmed at 'BBsf'; Outlook Stable

EUR10.5 million class F notes affirmed at 'B-sf'; Outlook Stable

Tikehau CLO II B.V. is a cash flow collateralised loan obligation
(CLO). Net proceeds from the issue of the notes are being used to
refinance the current outstanding class A, C, and D notes. The
portfolio is actively managed by Tikehau Capital Europe Limited.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

'B' Portfolio Credit Quality

Fitch expects the average credit quality of obligors to be in the
'B' category. The Fitch- weighted average rating factor (WARF) of
the current portfolio is 32.0.

High Recovery Expectations

At least 90% of the portfolio comprises senior secured obligations.
Recovery prospects for these assets are typically more favourable
than for second-lien, unsecured and mezzanine assets. The
Fitch-weighted average recovery rating (WARR) of the current
portfolio is 64.4%.

Diversified Asset Portfolio

The covenanted maximum exposure to the top 10 obligors for
assigning the expected ratings is 15% or 23% of the portfolio
balance, depending on the matrix chosen by the manager. The
transaction also includes limits on the largest Fitch-defined
industry exposure covenanted at 17.5% and on the three-largest
Fitch-defined industries covenanted at 40%. These covenants ensure
that the asset portfolio will not be exposed to excessive
concentration.

Limited Interest Rate Risk

Fixed-rate liabilities represent 0% of the target par, while
fixed-rate assets can represent up to 10% of the portfolio. At
closing, the issuer entered into interest rate caps to hedge the
transaction against rising interest rates. The notional of the caps
is EUR34.3 million, representing 8.6% of the target par amount, and
the strike rate is fixed at 2%. These caps will remain in place
through the refinancing and will expire in November 2021.

Extended Weighted Average Life (WAL)

On the refinancing date, the issuer will extend the WAL covenant by
one year to 6.5 years as part of the refinancing of the notes and
update the Fitch matrix based on the extended WAL covenant.

Cash Flow Analysis

Fitch used a customised proprietary cash flow model to replicate
the principal and interest waterfalls. This was also used to test
the various structural features of the transaction, as well as to
assess their effectiveness, including the structural protection
provided by excess spread diverted through the par value and
interest coverage tests.


TIKEHAU CLO II: Moody's Affirms B2 Rating on EUR10MM Class F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has assigned the
following definitive ratings to refinancing notes to be issued by
Tikehau CLO II B.V.:

EUR244,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2029,
Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

EUR23,000,000 Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2029, Definitive Rating Assigned A2 (sf)

EUR18,000,000 Class D Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2029, Definitive Rating Assigned Baa3 (sf)

At the same time, Moody's affirmed the ratings of the outstanding
notes which have not been refinanced:

EUR46,000,000 Class B Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2029,
Affirmed Aa2 (sf); previously on Nov 30, 2016 Definitive Rating
Assigned Aa2 (sf)

EUR28,000,000 Class E Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2029, Affirmed Ba2 (sf); previously on Nov 30, 2016 Definitive
Rating Assigned Ba2 (sf)

EUR10,500,000 Class F Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2029, Affirmed B2 (sf); previously on Nov 30, 2016 Definitive
Rating Assigned B2 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on a consideration of the
risks associated with the CLO's portfolio and structure as
described in its methodology.

The Issuer will issue the refinancing notes in connection with the
refinancing of the following classes of notes: Class A Notes, Class
C Notes and Class D Notes due 2029, previously issued on November
30, 2016. On the refinancing date, the Issuer will use the proceeds
from the issuance of the refinancing notes to redeem in full the
Original Notes. The Class B Notes, Class E Notes and Class F Notes
are not being refinanced and will remain outstanding following the
Refinancing Date. The terms and conditions of the notes will be
amended accordingly.

On the Original Closing Date, the Issuer also issued EUR 44.70
million of subordinated notes, which will remain outstanding. The
terms and conditions of the subordinated notes will be amended in
accordance with the refinancing notes' conditions.

As part of this refinancing, the Issuer will decrease the spreads
paid on the affected classes of notes and will extend the weighted
average life covenant by 1 year. In addition, the Issuer will amend
the base matrix and modifiers that Moody' will take into account
for the assignment of the definitive ratings.

Tikehau CLO II B.V. is a managed cash flow CLO. At least 90% of the
portfolio must consist of secured senior loans or senior secured
bonds and up to 10% of the portfolio may consist of unsecured
senior loans, second-lien loans, high yield bonds and mezzanine
loans. The underlying portfolio is already fully ramped as of the
refinancing date.

Tikehau Capital Europe Limited will manage the CLO. It will direct
the selection, acquisition and disposition of collateral on behalf
of the Issuer and may engage in trading activity, including
discretionary trading, during the transaction's remaining one and a
half year reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to certain
restrictions, purchases are permitted using principal proceeds from
unscheduled principal payments and proceeds from sales of credit
risk obligations.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
March 2019.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

The rated notes' performance is subject to uncertainty. The notes'
performance is sensitive to the performance of the underlying
portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and credit conditions
that may change. The collateral manager's investment decisions and
management of the transaction will also affect the notes'
performance.

Moody's modeled the transaction using CDOEdge, a cash flow model
based on the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section
2.3 of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in March 2019.

Moody's used the following base-case modeling assumptions:

Target Par Amount: EUR 400,000,000

Diversity Score: 50

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2939

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 3.60%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 5.25%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 42.0%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 6.42 years

Moody's has addressed the potential exposure to obligors domiciled
in countries with local currency ceiling of A1 or below. As per the
portfolio constraints and eligibility criteria, exposures to
countries with LCC of A1 to A3 cannot exceed 10% and obligors
cannot be domiciled in countries with LCC below A3.




=========
S P A I N
=========

FCC AQUALIA: Fitch Affirms BB+ LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed FCC Aqualia, S.A.'s Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating at 'BB+' with a Stable Outlook. Fitch has also
affirmed the utilities company's senior secured ratings at 'BBB-'.

The 'BB+' IDR of Aqualia reflects its low business risk as a water
and wastewater network operator with long-term municipal
concessions, largely in Spain; water-related infrastructures under
build, own and transfer (BOT) concessions; and limited
non-regulated operation and maintenance (O&M) contracts and
water-related engineering procurement and construction (EPC)
activities. Its ratings also reflect its expectations of gradual
deleveraging until 2022, supported by steady cash-flow generation
and a limitation on dividend distribution defined by bond
documentation.

The Stable Outlook reflects management's decision to resume
business expansion and dividend distributions from 2019, which is
financially offset by a new cash interest inflow from FCC S.A.
(FCC), Aqualia's majority shareholder. Finally, Fitch views the
corporate governance of Aqualia as being strengthened by the entry
of IFM Global Infrastructure investment fund (IFM) as a relevant
minority shareholder of the company.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Water Concessions Drive Rating: Resilient municipal water
concessions, largely in Spain, contributed 83% of total recourse
EBITDA, BOT concessions 3%, O&M 7%, and EPC 7%. Municipal
concessions have around 12 years of remaining life and annual
renewal rates are above 90%. Growth in EPC activities, which are
the most volatile part of the business, above 10% of consolidated
EBITDA would require board approval. This supports the resilience
of the business risk profile.

Fitch expects municipal water and BOT concessions to represent
around 90% of EBITDA by 2022, supporting Aqualia's business risk
profile.

Resuming Growth: In 2019 the company has announced a new business
plan that reinstates business expansion, following a period of only
maintenance capex. Total capex for 2019-2022 is EUR469 million, of
which 39% is for growth through tendering or small scale bolt-on
M&A. The plan targets to grow water concession activity (EUR131
million) in traditional areas in Europe (i.e. Spain, France and
Portugal) and Latam (i.e. Mexico, Peru and Chile); and BOT projects
(EUR25 million) in Latam and MENA (i.e. Saudi Arabia, Argelia and
Egypt), in which Aqualia has had previous experience.

Predominantly Non-recourse Growth: The bulk of BOT projects, which
will most likely be financed with project-funding and structured in
a special purpose vehicle (SPV) with a local partner (up to 49%),
would fall outside the recourse scope of the rating and bonds.
Equity contributions by Aqualia to those non-recourse SPVs would
fall within the recourse scope, as do limited cash dividend
received from 2019-2022. Fitch expects expansion capex to start in
2019 and a ramp-up from 2020.

Fitch may re-considers the deconsolidated approach to credit ratios
should the expansion in core business that is funded with
non-recourse debt become material.

Capex Timing and Scale Uncertain: Fitch sees positive prospects for
water-infrastructure development, especially in water treatment
(i.e. desalination, waste water treatment plants), in the various
geographies in which the company operates. However, forecasted
projects within the plan are not yet earmarked for funding as they
depend on the company's success in the relevant upcoming tender
offers in light of competition. Aqualia is currently bidding for
several projects in countries with long-term national planning to
improve water conditions.

Additional Cash Flow Benefits Bondholders: Fitch believes that the
September 2018 novation of the two existing subordinated loans
(total amount of EUR807 million) to FCC is positive for Aqualia's
bondholders as cash interest received (instead of earlier PIK)
represents recurring operating cash inflow for Aqualia's activities
within the recourse scope. In practice, this can offset annual
service fees paid by Aqualia to FCC (EUR24 million for 2018). The
inclusion of this cash flow of around EUR29 million annually in
funds from operations (FFO) results in a steady decrease in
FFO-based leverage of around 0.7x.

Restricted Dividends and Leverage: The EUR1.35 billion bonds
documentation and the shareholder agreement set a maximum leverage
for the company of recourse net debt/recourse EBITDA below 5.0x,
which translates into slightly higher FFO net leverage than is
consistent with the 'BB+' IDR. The company however has reaffirmed
its commitment to maintaining leverage in line with the current
rating.

In addition, annual dividends are limited to a 45% pay-out of
cumulated net Income from January 2017. Aqualia has approved a
EUR90 million dividend in 2H19, close to the maximum allowed
distribution. Fitch expects the pay-out to be at 45% of annual net
income thereafter.

Higher Leverage than Peers': Aqualia's leverage is high compared
with European rated peers', which is a rating constraint. Aqualia's
recourse FFO adjusted net leverage fell to 6.3x at end-2018 from
7.9x at end- 2017. Fitch forecasts it to continue falling in 2019
to around 5.5x, reaching the negative guideline for a 'BB+' rating
two years earlier than Fitch expects last year, on the back of the
additional cash interest received and steady cash-flow generation.
This is despite higher capex and dividend distributions that are at
the maximum allowed under the bond's documentation.

Cash Generative Business: 2018 has been a challenging year due to
weather-related lower water volumes (around -2%) and a moderate
average tariff increase of 1.12% (due to the slowdown of
investments in an election year in Spain). This resulted in a 0.7%
decrease in like-for-like revenue following a strong 2017. However,
cost efficiencies and managerial actions to improve working capital
cycle have offset weak revenue at EBITDA and FFO level. Moreover,
low maintenance capex and a lack of dividend payments in 2018 have
resulted in healthy cash generation. Fitch expects Aqualia to be
FCF- neutral-to-positive until 2022.

Concessions Still Favoured by Municipalities: Political initiatives
advocating the transfer of water services to local authorities only
materialised for a small number of municipalities in 2018, with no
implications for Aqualia. In addition, contracts have been moved to
the public sector only after the expiration of the concessions
agreement. In its view municipalities will continue to opt for
concession schemes due to budget constraints and lack of regional,
state or EU support. Aqualia had a success rate in contract
renewals of 94% in 2018.

IFM Strengthens FCC/Aqualia Operational Separation: The sale of 49%
of Aqualia to IFM was completed in September 2018. IFM is
represented in three out of the seven-member Board of Directors. A
new shareholder agreement has been signed where operational
related-party transactions with FCC have been defined under a
support service agreement. The entry of IFM strengthens its view of
the operational separation of the two entities. In addition, Fitch
believes that new minority shareholder IFM has strengthened
corporate governance controls on related-party transactions.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Aqualia is a water and sewerage network operator that, unlike some
of its European peers, does not own its asset base. However, its
investments are supported by the value of its concessions. The
company is fairly well positioned relative to peers in water-cycle
management activities, but its water infrastructure construction
activity adds some volatility to cash flows compared with pure
water asset operators such as Canal de Isabel II, S.A.
(BBB+/Stable). Moreover, the company operates in a decentralised
and less developed regulatory environment than other European
countries, with slightly higher business risk than for Italian and
UK players. Aqualia's leverage is the highest in the peer group,
resulting in a lower rating.

In accordance with Fitch's parent and subsidiary linkage (PSL)
methodology, Fitch rates Aqualia on a standalone basis as Fitch
assesses the legal and operational ties between FCC and Aqualia as
weak. However, its assessment is based on the contractual
ring-fencing provisions in the bond documentation and the
operational and financial separation from FCC, therefore looser
ring-fencing provisions or more related-party transactions could
lead us to reconsider the PSL linkage.

Senior secured bonds are rated one notch above Aqualia's IDR. This
uplift is supported by a combination of creditor-friendly
provisions in the financing package (ie the security provided, the
debt service coverage reserve account (DSCRA) for 12 months and the
covenanted structure). Any of these in isolation would not support
the uplift. In addition, Fitch does not apply the one-notch uplift
due to above-average expected recoveries that are common to
regulated networks. This is due to the less developed regulatory
framework than other jurisdictions and the complexity of a highly
granular base of contracts.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions within its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Growth of existing businesses based on CPI of around 2%, which
is around 0.5% above CPI expectations and stable water
consumption;

  - 90% renewal rate of water concession contracts, in line with
historical trend;

  - Recourse EBITDA margin of 20% for 2019-2022; water and BOT
concessions: 24%, O&M: 10%; and EPC: 8%;

  - Average capex of around EUR116 million per year over 2019-2022,
including around EUR70 million for maintenance O&M and EUR46
million for growth;

  - Limited EBITDA and dividends received from new contracts
awarded and acquisitions (around EUR22 million in 2022);

  - EUR90 million dividend paid in 2019, which is around the
maximum level of allowed distributions under the bond
documentation. Annual pay-out ratio of around 45% from 2020
onwards.


GRANADA HIPOTECARIO 1: Fitch Affirms CCCsf Rating on Class B Debt
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed three Spanish RMBS transactions, and all
Rating Outlooks remain Stable.

The transactions comprise Spanish mortgages serviced by Bankia S.A.
(BBB/Stable/F3) for AyT Caja Granada Hipotecario 1 (Granada 1), AyT
Caja Murcia Hipotecario I (Murcia 1), and AyT Caja Murcia
Hipotecario II (Murcia 2).

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Credit Enhancement (CE) Trends

Fitch expects CE levels for Murcia 1 and 2 securitisation notes to
remain stable as the prevailing pro rata amortisation is expected
to continue in the near term. The amortisation of the notes will
switch to sequential when the outstanding portfolio balance
represents less than 10% of their original amount (currently 14%
and 16% respectively), or sooner if certain performance triggers
are breached. On the other hand, CE ratios for Granada 1's class A
notes are expected to continue increasing as the sequential
amortisation is expected to continue.

Performance Adjustment Floor (PAF)

A higher 70% PAF was used for Murcia 1 and Murcia 2, even though
seasoning and indexed LTV characteristics are compatible with a
lower 50% PAF in line with Fitch's European RMBS Rating Criteria.
Fitch believes transaction performance during the first few years
after transactions closed may have been influenced by originator
buybacks for loans in arrears or defaulted. The high payment rates,
and the absence of defaults during the first seven (Murcia 1) and
five (Murcia 2) years of performance support this assumption.
Nevertheless, Fitch considers more recent data to accurately
reflect transaction performance.

High Seasoning and Asset Performance

The rating actions reflect Fitch's expectation of stable credit
trends given the significant seasoning of the securitised
portfolios of 12-13 years, the prevailing low interest rate
environment and the Spanish macroeconomic outlook. Three-month plus
arrears (excluding defaults) as a percentage of the current pool
balance remains below 0.5% for both Murcia 1 and 2, and below 1.5%
for Granada 1.

Rating Caps Due to Counterparty Risks

The 'A+sf' rating cap on Granada 1 and Murcia 2 senior notes
reflect account bank replacement triggers supporting rating up to
the 'A' category. In addition, Granada 1 is exposed to an
additional rating cap at the 'A' category due to payment
interruption risk. Fitch assesses the availability of liquidity
sources as insufficient to cover stressed senior fees, net swap
payments, and stressed senior note interest amounts in the event of
a servicer disruption while an alternative arrangement is
implemented.

Fitch has taken the following rating actions:

Granada 1:

Class A: affirmed at 'A+sf' Outlook Stable

Class B: affirmed at 'CCCsf' Recovery Estimate (RE) revised to 90%
from 60%

Class C: affirmed at 'Csf' RE 0%

Class D: affirmed at 'Csf' RE 0%

Murcia 1:

Class A: affirmed at 'AA-sf' Outlook Stable

Class B: affirmed at 'Asf' Outlook Stable

Class C: affirmed at 'BBB-sf' Outlook Stable

Murcia 2:

Class A: affirmed at 'A+sf' Outlook Stable

Class B: affirmed at 'BBB+sf' Outlook Stable

Class C: affirmed at 'BBB-sf' Outlook Stable




===========================
U N I T E D   K I N G D O M
===========================

BURY FC: Creditors Seek More Time to Consider Rescue Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
BBC News reports that Bury Football Club's creditors have asked for
more time to consider a rescue plan to clear some of the League One
club's debts.

Owner Steve Dale put forward a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA)
proposal in June which would see the club's football creditors paid
in full, BBC recounts.

Unsecured creditors, including HM Revenue and Customs, would be
paid 25% of the money owed, BBC states.

According to BBC, creditors will now hold further negotiations
before meeting on Thursday, July 18.

If approved, the CVA would qualify as an insolvency event under
English Football League rules, which would see Bury deducted
points, BBC notes.

The Shakers are looking for new ownership after Mr. Dale put the
club up for sale in April, BBC discloses.


DEBENHAMS PLC: Calls on Mike Ashley to Drop CVA Challenge
---------------------------------------------------------
Alys Key at Belfast Telegraph reports that Debenhams plc has called
for Mike Ashley to drop a challenge to its store closures and rent
reductions after property firm M&G withdrew from a similar action.

A challenge from Mr. Ashley's Sports Direct and Combined Property
Control (CPC) remains outstanding, Belfast Telegraph notes.

According to Belfast Telegraph, Debenhams chairman Terry Duddy
said: "I call on Sports Direct and CPC to do the same.  If they do
not, we will seek to have it thrown out.  In the meantime, we
continue to make good progress with the company's restructuring
plans."

The proposals involve 50 store closures as well as lower rents on
more than 100 outlets, Belfast Telegraph discloses.

                         About Debenhams plc

Debenhams plc is a British multinational retailer operating under a
department store format in the United Kingdom and Ireland with
franchise stores in other countries.  It is the biggest department
store chain in the UK with 166 stores, and employs about 25,000
people.

The Company went into administration on April 9, 2019.  Chad
Griffin, Simon Kirkhope and Andrew Johnson of FTI Consulting LLP
were appointed as administrators.  The administrators sold the
parent's entire holding of the group's operating subsidiaries to a
company controlled by its lenders in a pre-packaged sale.

S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer credit rating on
Debenhams to 'D' from 'SD' (selective default), following the
administration filing.


MONSOON ACCESSORIZE: Announces 50 Redundancies After CVA Approval
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Drapers reports that Monsoon Accessorize has announced up to 50
redundancies across its head office teams, as part of its ongoing
restructuring.

According to Drapers, staff were told on July 4 that up to 50 roles
were to enter into consultation for redundancy.  It is not
confirmed at this stage which teams have been affected, Drapers
notes.

The news follows the approval of Monsoon Accessorize's company
voluntary arrangement by creditors on July 3, Drapers relays.

The CVA proposals, as announced on June 20, outline rent reductions
of between 25% and 65% across 135 out of a total 258 Monsoon and
Accessorize stores, Drapers discloses.  No store closures have been
proposed as part of the CVA, but the retailer is seeking to exit at
least seven Monsoon stores as leases expire, Drapers states.

       About Monsoon Accessorize

Monsoon Accessorize is a fashion chain based in the United Kingdom,
which sells clothes, accessories and homeware. It reported faced
financial difficulties. UK firm Shoosmiths advised the company on
its restructuring.  The company ultimately sought a company
voluntary arrangement.


RJD FABRICATIONS: Enters Administration Amid Financial Woes
-----------------------------------------------------------
Business Sale reports that RJD Fabrications Ltd., an engineering
firm based in South Yorkshire, has fallen into administration as a
result of difficult trading conditions and consequential cash flow
difficulties.

According to Business Sale, the company, which provides engineering
and fabrication services from its site in Rotherham, was forced to
call in professional advisory firm KPMG to handle the
administration process, with partners Howard Smith --
howard.smith@kpmg.co.uk -- and Dave Costley-Wood appointed as joint
administrators.

The company endured a long period of unsustainable and loss-making
activity, providing specialist heavy duty steel engineering
services, which resulted in its administration, Business Sale
relates.

The administrators are exploring the sale of the assets, and are
inviting potential buyers to express their interests immediately,
Business Sale discloses.


[*] UK: Must Leave Under Clean Brexit or Face EUR200BB Bailout
--------------------------------------------------------------
Maggie Pagano at The Telegraph reports that Britain could face
paying more than EUR200 billion to the European Union in the event
of a eurozone bail-out unless the UK leaves under a managed clean
Brexit, according to leading City and business figures.

According to The Telegraph, the warning comes from the Brexit
Coalition, a new grouping that represents 29 diverse pro-Brexit
campaigning organizations, including the Alliance of British
Entrepreneurs, Artists for Brexit and Farmers for Britain as well
as Labour Leave and Green Leaves.

In a letter sent this week to Conservative Party constituency
chairmen and senior Tory officials, the Brexit Coalition urges
members to support a new prime minister who is "committed
unequivocally" to backing a clean WTO-based Brexit, The Telegraph
relates.



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1529-2754.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.


                * * * End of Transmission * * *