/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCREUR_Public/140609.mbx
T R O U B L E D C O M P A N Y R E P O R T E R
E U R O P E
Monday, June 9, 2014, Vol. 15, No. 112
Headlines
B U L G A R I A
BDZ: Delays Payment on EUR120MM Ministry of Transport Loan
F R A N C E
RENAULT SA: S&P Revises Outlook to Positive & Affirms 'BB+' CCR
G E R M A N Y
STABILUS SA: Fitch Affirms 'B' Issuer Default Rating
G R E E C E
GREECE: Fitch Retains Ratings over Updated Assessment Assumptions
I R E L A N D
AVOCA CLO XI: Moody's Assigns B2 Rating to EUR17.5MM Cl. F Notes
AVOCA CLO XI: S&P Assigns 'B-' Rating to Class F Notes
CARLYLE GLOBAL 2014-2: Moody's Rates EUR11MM Cl. E Notes '(P)B2'
IRISH BANK: Liquidators Prepare to Sell Assets & Repay Debt
I T A L Y
ALITALIA SPA: Creditor Banks Support Etihad's Turnaround Plan
ITALY: Fitch Updates Mortgage Assumptions; Rating Impact Limited
MONTE DEI PASCHI: Prices Fundraising at Deep Discount
L U X E M B O U R G
ARDAGH PACKAGING: Moody's Affirms 'B3' Corporate Family Rating
ARDAGH PACKAGING: S&P Affirms 'B' CCR on Debt Refinancing
N E T H E R L A N D S
CHARGER OPCO: S&P Assigns Prelim. 'BB' LT Corp. Credit Rating
HEMA BV: S&P Assigns Prelim. 'B+' CCR; Outlook Stable
P O L A N D
* POLAND: Corporate Bankruptcies Up in May, Euler Hermes Says
R O M A N I A
OLTCHIM SA: Government Considers All Restructuring Measures
R U S S I A
MDM BANK: S&P Lowers Counterparty Rating to 'B+'; Outlook Neg.
NIZHNY NOVGOROD: S&P Withdraws 'BB' LT Issuer Credit Rating
S L O V E N I A
ACH: Power Struggle Ends Amid Bankruptcy Threat
S P A I N
CAIXA PENEDES 1: S&P Lowers Rating on Class C Notes to 'BB'
PYMES SANTANDER 8: DBRS Assigns 'C' Rating to Series C Notes
PYMES SANTANDER 9: DBRS Assigns 'CCC' Rating to Series B Notes
S W E D E N
MUNTERS AB: S&P Assigns 'B' Corp. Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
S W I T Z E R L A N D
DUFRY AG: Moody's Affirms Ba3 Corp. Family Rating; Outlook Stable
DUFRY AG: Fitch Revises Outlook to Neg. & Affirms 'BB' IDR
NUANCE GROUP: Moody's Places 'B2' CFR on Review for Upgrade
U N I T E D K I N G D O M
EUROSAIL-UK: Moody's Raises Rating on EUR30.33MM Notes to Caa3
FAIRHOLD SECURITISATION: Fitch Cuts Rating on Cl. B Notes to CCC
HEARTS OF MIDLOTHIAN: Set to Officially Exit Administration Today
HERCULES PLC: Fitch Affirms 'CCsf' Rating on Class E Notes
NEW WORLD: S&P Lowers CCR to 'CC' on Upcoming Exchange Offer
RMAC 2005-NSP2: S&P Raises Ratings on 2 Note Classes to B+
SAGA LIMITED: Moody's Upgrades CFR to 'Ba2' Following IPO
X X X X X X X X
* EUROPE: EU Commission Okays New Cross-Border Insolvency Rules
* BOND PRICING: For the Week June 2 to June 6, 2014
*********
===============
B U L G A R I A
===============
BDZ: Delays Payment on EUR120MM Ministry of Transport Loan
----------------------------------------------------------
FOCUS News Agency, citing Trud Daily, reports that creditors of
Bulgarian state railway company (BDZ) have sent a notifying
letter concerning the delayed payment of the bond loan amounting
to EUR120 million to the Ministry of Transport.
According to FOCUS News, the Transport Ministry expressed hopes
that the European Commission will allow the Bulgarian government
to aid BDZ in order to pay the loan in installments. Bulgaria
hopes to defer the loan for 10 years, FOCUS News says.
Creditors of BDZ are FMS Wertmanagement, KA Finanz, DEPFA, BNP
Paribas and Bulgarian Corporate Commercial Bank, FOCUS News
discloses.
Established in 1885, The Bulgarian State Railways, commonly known
as BDZ, is Bulgaria's state railway company and the largest
railway carrier in the country. The company's headquarters is
located in the capital Sofia.
===========
F R A N C E
===========
RENAULT SA: S&P Revises Outlook to Positive & Affirms 'BB+' CCR
----------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services revised its outlook on French
automotive manufacturer Renault S.A. to positive from stable. At
the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB+/B' long- and short-term
corporate credit ratings on the company.
The outlook revision reflects S&P's view that Renault could
maintain strong credit ratios in the next two years while
gradually improving its profitability.
Renault has markedly improved its financial profile in recent
years. Between 2010 -- when S&P raised the company's long-term
corporate credit rating to 'BB+' -- and 2013, the adjusted funds
from operations (FFO)-to-debt ratio climbed to 61% from 31%,
thanks to asset disposals and earnings growth. Over that three-
year period, the company's adjusted debt contracted to EUR4.0
billion from EUR5.7 billion. The automotive division had a
EUR1.7 billion net cash position on a reported basis at year-end
2013. S&P expects Renault will continue to generate positive
free operating cash flows in 2014 and 2015 owing to supportive
operating trends, capital expenditures in line with historical
trends, and limited working capital cash outflows. S&P also
assumes that the company will maintain a disciplined approach
toward shareholder remuneration and acquisitions.
In S&P's opinion, an upgrade would require that Renault continues
to improve the profitability of its automotive division, despite
recent pressures in international markets. The reported
operating margin of the automotive segment rose to 1.3% in 2013
from 0.1% in 2012, on the back of increasing volumes and cost-
cutting measures. Even though operations in emerging markets are
currently weighing on earnings, S&P believes that these
operations remain fundamentally supportive of Renault's credit
quality. In 2014, S&P assumes that Renault will partly offset
the depreciation of emerging market currencies with price
increases. Regarding Russia, whose importance for Renault should
increase due to the company's full consolidation of the Russian
automobile manufacturer AvtoVAZ by end-2014, S&P forecasts a
limited earnings decline owing to the renewal of the vehicle
line-up and the high share of Russian production.
Under S&P's base case, it assumes:
-- Car sales of global automakers will rise by 4.1% in 2014
and by 5.2% in 2015.
-- Sales in European markets will increase by 3.2% in 2014 and
by 4.3% in 2015.
-- Volume growth and cost savings will roughly offset negative
currency effects in 2014.
-- The company's financial policy will remain prudent, with a
limited increase in shareholder remuneration and no large
debt-financed acquisition.
Based on these assumptions, S&P arrives at the following credit
measures:
-- Renault's adjusted EBITDA margin will rise to about 9% in
2014, from 8.3% in 2013, and reach between 9% and 10% by
2015.
-- The reported operating margin of Renault's core automotive
operations will structurally improve and the consolidated
operating margin will continue up toward 5%.
-- S&P sees more than a one-in-three likelihood that Renault
will maintain an adjusted FFO-to-debt ratio of more than
45% in the next two years.
The positive outlook on Renault reflects S&P's opinion that its
financial policy will support credit metrics over the next 24
months and that the company will gradually improve the
profitability of its automotive operations. As a result, S&P
expects Renault's adjusted EBITDA margin to move closer to the
middle of the 9%-10% range by 2015.
S&P may raise its ratings on Renault if the company maintains an
adjusted FFO-to-debt ratio above 45%. In that case, S&P would
revise its financial risk profile assessment to "modest" from
"intermediate." Such a scenario could unfold if, for instance,
Renault moderately increases shareholder remuneration and does
not make large debt-financed acquisitions. An upgrade would
require that the profitability of automotive operations keeps
improving, thanks to productivity gains and the recovery of the
European car market.
S&P could revise the outlook to stable if Renault was unable to
preserve an adjusted FFO-to-debt ratio above 45%, as a result of
a more aggressive financial policy or a sharp decline in
earnings. S&P would also revise the outlook to stable if the
operating margin of automotive operations deteriorated because of
declining sales or an inability to contain costs.
=============
G E R M A N Y
=============
STABILUS SA: Fitch Affirms 'B' Issuer Default Rating
----------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Stabilus S.A.'s (formerly Servus
Holdco S.a.r.l.) Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B' with a
Positive Outlook. The remaining EUR256.1 million senior secured
notes issued by Servus Luxembourg Holding S.C.A have been
upgraded to 'BB-'/'RR2' from 'B+'/'RR3' based on improved
recoveries. The ratings have been removed from Rating Watch
Positive (RWP) where they were placed on April 30, 2014.
The rating actions follow Stabilus's successful IPO on May 23,
2014 and the reduction of debt by EUR58.9 million. Fitch
forecasts that funds from operations (FFO) adjusted leverage will
trend towards 4x by end of September 2014 (FY14), albeit with
interim debt fluctuations relating to short-term debt. The debt
reduction reduces interest expenses by approximately EUR4.5
million per year, resulting in a FFO/interest cover ratio above
3.0x (2015 forecast: 3.7x). At the same time, public listing has
further diversified the funding sources available to Stabilus and
enhanced its financial flexibility.
The Positive Outlook reflects the substantial reduction in debt
following the partial repayment of the bond, enhanced financial
flexibility and expected FFO interest cover of 3.7x for FY 2015.
In addition, Stabilus continues to implement its strategy of
growth and further diversification with the Powerise segment
being an important contributor. The remaining senior secured
notes also benefit from improved recoveries following debt
reduction. Stabilus's current performance is in line with Fitch's
expectations.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Deleveraging Through IPO
Fitch previously expected Stabilus's FFO adjusted leverage to
remain near 4.5x due to cash requirements related to the
execution of the expansion strategy. The IPO and debt reduction
of EUR58.9 million will reduce leverage to a level of around4x,
while enhancing financial flexibility. Discretionary cash flow
should increase due to lower interest payments.
Balanced, Resilient Profile
Stabilus is the market leader in its main and commoditized
product -- gas springs -- with a significantly greater market
share than its nearest competitors. As a result, the company has
considerable economies of scale and sound cash generation. The
ratings are further supported by Stabilus's broad mix of mature
and growth products in both automotive and industrial
applications, with limited customer concentration. This helps
provide a buffer against the high demand volatility and
cyclicality that characterize the mature markets Stabilus
operates in. Given Stabilus's high fixed-cost base, a sustained
decline in demand would affect profitability and cash flow
generation.
Competitive Threats Remain
Stabilus has successfully positioned itself as a favored supplier
of automated, electro-mechanical opening and closing systems, and
has consequently become increasingly important to OEMs' supply
chains. However, Stabilus competes with larger and more
diversified suppliers, which Fitch expects will react to the
company's ambitious growth plans. In addition, this segment is
likely to see higher R&D and capex requirements, which will hold
back the company's deleveraging efforts.
Cash Flow Fluctuation
Stabilus has generated positive free cash flow (FCF) margins over
the past four years and during 1HFY14. However, capacity
expansion efforts are likely to remain a strong cash drain,
although this should be mitigated by reduced interest expenses
following its IPO and debt repayment. As with most industrial
producers, Stabilus experiences seasonal working capital
volatility. Outflows are heaviest during the early part of the
year. FCF generation could be further restrained by dividend
payments of 20%-40% of net income as planned in the new dividend
policy.
Sufficient Financial Flexibility
Fitch views Stabilus's liquidity as adequate with sufficient
financial flexibility. Stabilus had EUR35 million of cash on
balance sheet at end-FY1H14, although around EUR10 million of
this was for working capital needs and some of it is restricted.
The group has access to a EUR25 million revolving credit facility
(RCF). Moreover, Stabilus has access to a EUR35 million factoring
program, of which EUR20 million had been utilized in March 2014.
Strong Recoveries
The 'BB-' notes' Recovery Rating is 'RR2', reflecting above-
average recoveries. Recovery rates for the remaining creditors
are expected to improve as a result of debt reduction. The
notching between the IDR and the instrument rating has widened to
two notches as a result of the debt reduction.
Rating Sensitivities
Positive: The group focuses on three product lines (gas springs,
Powerise and swivel chairs) and its overall scale is limited
compared with some other automotive suppliers. Therefore, in
addition to enhanced product and geographic diversification,
upgrades would require a substantial strengthening of key credit
ratios. We would view FFO adjusted leverage sustainably below
4.0x, FFO interest cover sustainably above 3.5x and fixed charge
cover sustainably above 3.0x as a pre-requisite.
Negative: Negative rating action could be considered if FFO
adjusted leverage sustainably exceeds 6.0x, and minimal FCF
margins are reached. Shifts to a shareholder friendly policy
could also lead to negative rating action.
===========
G R E E C E
===========
GREECE: Fitch Retains Ratings over Updated Assessment Assumptions
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has updated its criteria assumptions for assessing
credit risk in Greek residential mortgage loan pools. The updated
assumptions do not have any impact on the existing Greek RMBS and
covered bond ratings.
Following further weakening of the Greek housing market Fitch has
made its house price decline assumptions more conservative.
Fitch's base default expectations on Greek mortgage pools have
remained unchanged; however, some borrower and product specific
foreclosure frequency (FF) adjustments have increased, as
borrowers with loans secured by second homes and unemployed
borrowers have shown heightened probabilities of default as part
of the performed regression analysis. FF adjustment for loans in
arrears has been revised upwards to reflect a high portion of
loans becoming delinquent and the potential difficulty of these
loans returning to performing due to a stressful economic
environment.
Following the upgrade of the Greek sovereign Country Ceiling to
'BB' from 'B+', Fitch has added assumptions for rating scenarios
up to 'BB'.
House prices in Greece have declined by 34% on average from their
2008 peak across regions. Fitch expects Greek house prices to
suffer a further decline from current levels of approximately 16%
over the medium term in the context of the severe recession the
country is going through and the uncertainty surrounding the real
estate taxation framework. Fitch has revised upwards its average
peak-to-trough house price decline expectation for Greece to 45%
from 42% in nominal terms.
Fitch has maintained the FF floor in the range of 40%-60% for
loans that have been subject to a restructuring, as the agency
believes that borrowers who have experienced problems servicing
their mortgages and who have thus opted for a "restructuring"
package are more susceptible to economic shocks. Fitch has
revised upwards servicing costs assumption as the level of loans
in arrears is high and volume of restructured loans is expected
to increase. For Greek banks loan restructure is a main method
for dealing with the high levels of arrears while the property
foreclosure ban is in place.
=============
I R E L A N D
=============
AVOCA CLO XI: Moody's Assigns B2 Rating to EUR17.5MM Cl. F Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has assigned the
following ratings to notes issued by Avoca CLO XI Limited:
EUR275,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2027, Definitive Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)
EUR18,000,000 Class B-1 Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes due 2027,
Definitive Rating Assigned Aa2 (sf)
EUR61,000,000 Class B-2 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2027, Definitive Rating Assigned Aa2 (sf)
EUR24,500,000 Class C Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes
due 2027, Definitive Rating Assigned A2 (sf)
EUR31,500,000 Class D Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes
due 2027, Definitive Rating Assigned Baa2 (sf)
EUR32,500,000 Class E Deferrable Junior Floating Rate Notes due
2027, Definitive Rating Assigned Ba2 (sf)
EUR17,500,000 Class F Deferrable Junior Floating Rate Notes due
2027, Definitive Rating Assigned B2 (sf)
Ratings Rationale
Moody's rating of the rated notes addresses the expected loss
posed to noteholders by the legal final maturity of the notes in
2027. The ratings reflect the risks due to defaults on the
underlying portfolio of loans given the characteristics and
eligibility criteria of the constituent assets, the relevant
portfolio tests and covenants as well as the transaction's
capital and legal structure. Furthermore, Moody's is of the
opinion that the collateral manager, Avoca Capital Holdings
("Avoca Capital"), has sufficient experience and operational
capacity and is capable of managing this CLO.
Avoca CLO XI is a managed cash flow CLO. At least 90% of the
portfolio must consist of senior secured loans or senior secured
bonds and up to 10% of the portfolio may consist of senior
unsecured loans, second-lien loans, mezzanine obligations, high
yield bonds and senior unsecured bonds. The portfolio is expected
to be 70% ramped up as of the closing date and to be comprised
predominantly of corporate loans to obligors domiciled in Western
Europe. The remainder of the portfolio will be acquired during
the six month ramp-up period in compliance with the portfolio
guidelines.
Avoca Capital will manage the CLO. It will direct the selection,
acquisition and disposition of collateral on behalf of the Issuer
and may engage in trading activity, including discretionary
trading, during the transaction's four-year reinvestment period.
Thereafter, purchases are permitted using principal proceeds from
unscheduled principal payments and proceeds from sales of credit
risk obligations, and are subject to certain restrictions.
In addition to the seven classes of notes rated by Moody's, the
Issuer will issue one class of subordinated notes which is not
rated.
The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests
which, if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to
pay down the notes in order of seniority.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the rating:
The rated notes' performance is subject to uncertainty. The
notes' performance is sensitive to the performance of the
underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. Avoca Capital's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
notes' performance.
Loss and Cash Flow Analysis:
Moody's modelled the transaction using CDOEdge, a cash flow model
based on the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in
Section 2.3 of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating
Collateralized Loan Obligations" rating methodology published in
February 2014. The cash flow model evaluates all default
scenarios that are then weighted considering the probabilities of
the binomial distribution assumed for the portfolio default rate.
In each default scenario, the corresponding loss for each class
of notes is calculated given the incoming cash flows from the
assets and the outgoing payments to third parties and
noteholders. Therefore, the expected loss or EL for each tranche
is the sum product of (i) the probability of occurrence of each
default scenario and (ii) the loss derived from the cash flow
model in each default scenario for each tranche. As such, Moody's
encompasses the assessment of stressed scenarios.
Moody's used the following base-case modelling assumptions:
Par amount: EUR 500,000,000
Diversity Score: 38
Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2810
Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 3.75%
Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 44.0%
Weighted Average Life (WAL): 8 years.
As part of the base case, Moody's has addressed the potential
exposure to obligors domiciled in countries with foreign currency
government bond rating of A3 or below. Following the effective
date, and given the portfolio constraints and the current
sovereign ratings in Europe, such exposure may not exceed 10% of
the total portfolio, where exposures to countries rated below
Baa3 cannot exceed 5%. As a result and in conjunction with the
current foreign government bond ratings of the eligible
countries, as a worst case scenario, a maximum 5% of the pool
would be domiciled in countries with single A local currency
country ceiling and 5% in Baa2 local currency country ceiling.
The remainder of the pool will be domiciled in countries which
currently have a local currency country ceiling of Aaa. Given
this portfolio composition, the model was run with different
target par amounts depending on the target rating of each class
of notes as further described in the rating methodology. The
portfolio haircuts are a function of the exposure size to
peripheral countries and the target ratings of the rated notes
and amount to 0.75% for the class A notes, 0.50% for the Class B
notes, 0.375% for the Class C notes and 0% for Classes D, E and
F.
The rated notes' performance is subject to uncertainty. The
notes' performance is sensitive to the performance of the
underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. Avoca Capital's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
notes' performance.
Stress Scenarios:
Together with the set of modelling assumptions above, Moody's
conducted an additional sensitivity analysis, which was an
important component in determining the provisional rating
assigned to the rated notes. This sensitivity analysis includes
increased default probability relative to the base case. Below is
a summary of the impact of an increase in default probability
(expressed in terms of WARF level) on each of the rated notes
(shown in terms of the number of notch difference versus the
current assigned rating, whereby a negative difference
corresponds to higher expected losses), holding all other factors
equal:
Percentage Change in WARF: WARF + 15% (to 3231 from 2810)
Ratings Impact in Rating Notches:
Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes: 0
Class B-1 Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes : -2
Class B-2 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes: -2
Class C Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes: -2
Class D Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes: -1
Class E Deferrable Junior Floating Rate Notes : 0
Class F Deferrable Junior Floating Rate Notes : 0
Percentage Change in WARF: WARF +30% (to 3653 from 2810)
Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes: 0
Class B-1 Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes : -3
Class B-2 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes: -3
Class C Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes: -4
Class D Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes: -3
Class E Deferrable Junior Floating Rate Notes : -2
Class F Deferrable Junior Floating Rate Notes : -2
The principal methodology used in this rating was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
February 2014.
AVOCA CLO XI: S&P Assigns 'B-' Rating to Class F Notes
------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned credit ratings to
Avoca CLO XI Ltd.'s floating and fixed-rate class A, B-1, B-2, C,
D, E, and F notes. At closing, Avoca CLO XI also issued an
unrated subordinated class of notes.
S&P's ratings reflect its assessment of the collateral
portfolio's credit quality, which has a weighted-average 'B'
rating. S&P considers that the portfolio as of closing is
diversified, primarily comprising broadly syndicated speculative-
grade senior secured term loans and senior secured bonds.
S&P's ratings also reflect the available credit enhancement for
the rated notes through the subordination of cash flows payable
to the subordinated notes. S&P subjected the structure to a cash
flow analysis to determine the break-even default rate (BDR) for
each rated class of notes. The BDR represents Standard & Poor's
estimate of the maximum level of gross defaults, based on S&P's
stress assumptions, that a tranche can withstand and still fully
repay the noteholders.
To determine the BDR for each rated class, S&P used the target
par amount, the covenanted weighted-average spread, the
covenanted weighted-average coupon, and the covenanted weighted-
average recovery rates. S&P applied various cash flow stress
scenarios, using four different default patterns, in conjunction
with different interest rate stress scenarios for each liability
rating category.
Following S&P's credit and cash flow analysis, its assessment of
available credit enhancement is commensurate with its ratings.
S&P's analysis shows that the available credit enhancement for
each class of notes was sufficient to withstand the defaults that
S&P applied in its supplemental tests (not counting excess
spread) outlined in S&P's corporate collateralized debt
obligations criteria.
In S&P's analysis, it considered that the transaction documents'
replacement and remedy mechanisms adequately mitigate the
transaction's exposure to counterparty risk under S&P's current
counterparty criteria.
Following the application of S&P's non-sovereign ratings
criteria, it considers that the transaction's exposure to country
risk is sufficiently mitigated at the assigned rating levels.
This is because the concentration of the pool comprising assets
in countries rated lower than 'A-' is limited to 10% of the
aggregate collateral balance.
The transaction's legal structure is bankruptcy-remote, in
accordance with S&P's European legal criteria.
Avoca CLO XI is a European cash flow collateralized loan
obligation (CLO), mainly comprising euro-denominated leveraged
loans and bonds issued by European borrowers. Avoca Holdings is
the investment manager.
RATINGS LIST
Avoca CLO XI Ltd.
EUR518.5 Million Senior Secured Floating-
and Fixed-Rate Notes and Subordinated Notes
Class Rating Amount
(mil. EUR)
A AAA (sf) 275.00
B-1 AA (sf) 18.00
B-2 AA (sf) 61.00
C A (sf) 24.50
D BBB (sf) 31.50
E BB (sf) 32.50
F B- (sf) 17.50
Subordinated NR 58.50
NR-Not rated.
CARLYLE GLOBAL 2014-2: Moody's Rates EUR11MM Cl. E Notes '(P)B2'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service announced that it has assigned the
following provisional ratings to notes to be issued by Carlyle
Global Market Strategies Euro CLO 2014-2 Limited:
EUR234,600,000 Class A-1 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2027, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)
EUR31,400,000 Class A-2A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2027, Assigned (P)Aa2 (sf)
EUR11,600,000 Class A-2B Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes due
2027, Assigned (P)Aa2 (sf)
EUR26,000,000 Class B Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2027, Assigned (P)A2 (sf)
EUR21,000,000 Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2027, Assigned (P)Baa2 (sf)
EUR27,300,000 Class D Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2027, Assigned (P)Ba2 (sf)
EUR11,000,000 Class E Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2027, Assigned (P)B2 (sf)
Moody's issues provisional ratings in advance of the final sale
of financial instruments, but these ratings only represent
Moody's preliminary credit opinions. Upon a conclusive review of
a transaction and associated documentation, Moody's will endeavor
to assign definitive ratings. A definitive rating (if any) may
differ from a provisional rating.
Ratings Rationale
Moody's provisional rating of the rated notes addresses the
expected loss posed to noteholders by legal final maturity of the
notes in 2027. The provisional ratings reflect the risks due to
defaults on the underlying portfolio of loans given the
characteristics and eligibility criteria of the constituent
assets, the relevant portfolio tests and covenants as well as the
transaction's capital and legal structure. Furthermore, Moody's
is of the opinion that the collateral manager, CELF Advisors LLP,
has sufficient experience and operational capacity and is capable
of managing this CLO.
CGMS Euro CLO 2014-2 is a managed cash flow CLO. At least 90% of
the portfolio must consist of secured senior obligations and up
to 10% of the portfolio may consist of unsecured senior loans,
second-lien loans, mezzanine obligations and high yield bonds.
The portfolio is expected to be 60% ramped up as of the closing
date and to be comprised predominantly of corporate loans to
obligors domiciled in Western Europe. The remainder of the
portfolio will be acquired during the six month ramp-up period in
compliance with the portfolio guidelines.
CELF Advisors will manage the CLO. It will direct the selection,
acquisition and disposition of collateral on behalf of the Issuer
and may engage in trading activity, including discretionary
trading, during the transaction's four-year reinvestment period.
Thereafter, purchases are permitted using principal proceeds from
unscheduled principal payments and proceeds from sales of credit
risk obligations, and are subject to certain restrictions.
In addition to the seven classes of notes rated by Moody's, the
Issuer will issue EUR39,100,000 of subordinated notes. Moody's
has not assigned rating to this class of notes.
The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests
which, if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to
pay down the notes in order of seniority.
Loss and Cash Flow Analysis:
Moody's modeled the transaction using CDOEdge, a cash flow model
based on the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in
Section 2.3 of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating
Collateralized Loan Obligations" rating methodology published in
February 2014. The cash flow model evaluates all default
scenarios that are then weighted considering the probabilities of
the binomial distribution assumed for the portfolio default rate.
In each default scenario, the corresponding loss for each class
of notes is calculated given the incoming cash flows from the
assets and the outgoing payments to third parties and
noteholders. Therefore, the expected loss or EL for each tranche
is the sum product of (i) the probability of occurrence of each
default scenario and (ii) the loss derived from the cash flow
model in each default scenario for each tranche.
Moody's used the following base-case modeling assumptions:
Par Amount: EUR391,000,000
Diversity Score: 36
Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2800
Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 4.05%
Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 6.00%
Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 42.0%
Weighted Average Life (WAL): 8.0 years.
Stress Scenarios:
Together with the set of modelling assumptions above, Moody's
conducted an additional sensitivity analysis, which was an
important component in determining the provisional rating
assigned to the rated notes. This sensitivity analysis includes
increased default probability relative to the base case. Below is
a summary of the impact of an increase in default probability
(expressed in terms of WARF level) on each of the rated notes
(shown in terms of the number of notch difference versus the
current model output, whereby a negative difference corresponds
to higher expected losses), holding all other factors equal.
Percentage Change in WARF: WARF + 15% (to 3220 from 2800)
Ratings Impact in Rating Notches:
Class A-1 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes: 0
Class A-2A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes: -2
Class A-2B Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes: -2
Class B Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes: -3
Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes: -2
Class D Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes: -1
Class E Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes: 0
Percentage Change in WARF: WARF +30% (to 3640 from 2800)
Class A-1 Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes: -1
Class A-2A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes: -3
Class A-2B Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes: -3
Class B Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes: -3
Class C Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes: -2
Class D Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes: -2
Class E Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes: -2
Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:
The principal methodology used in this rating was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
February 2014.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the rating:
The rated notes' performance is subject to uncertainty. The
notes' performance is sensitive to the performance of the
underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. CELF Advisors' investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
notes' performance.
IRISH BANK: Liquidators Prepare to Sell Assets & Repay Debt
-----------------------------------------------------------
Vincent Boland at The Financial Times reports that Anglo Irish
Bank, the institution that brought Ireland's financial sector
crashing down in 2008, has been "finally consigned to history" as
liquidators prepare to sell the last of its assets and repay its
outstanding debt.
Michael Noonan, Ireland's finance minister, said the progress of
the liquidation -- the biggest in Ireland -- was a significant
factor in the country's emergence in December from its EUR67.5
billion international bailout, which led to a sharp fall in Irish
borrowing costs, the FT relates.
The bailout was required after Anglo and most other Irish banks
fell victim to the bursting of a speculative property price
bubble, the FT notes.
KPMG, Anglo's "special liquidator", issued a progress report on
the liquidation on Friday showing that the bank, now known as
Irish Bank Resolution Corp., repaid the bulk of a EUR13 billion
loan advanced to facilitate the process, which began in February
last year, the FT relays. The outstanding EUR2 billion is
expected to be repaid later this year, which will effectively
mean that the process has been completed, the FT states.
Ireland's taxpayers poured EUR64 billion into the country's
financial institutions as they were buckling under the weight of
bad debts during the global financial crisis, the FT discloses.
Some EUR34 billion of that was sucked in by Anglo, the FT
recounts. Taxpayers are still owed a huge sum, but it is likely
never to be recovered once the liquidation has been completed,
the FT says.
About Irish Bank Resolution
Irish Bank Resolution Corp., the liquidation vehicle for what was
once one of Ireland's largest banks, filed a Chapter 15 petition
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 13-12159) on Aug. 26, 2013, to protect
U.S. assets of the former Anglo Irish Bank Corp. from being
seized by creditors. Irish Bank Resolution sought assistance
from the U.S. court in liquidating Anglo Irish Bank Corp. and
Irish Nationwide Building Society. The two banks failed and were
merged into IBRC in July 2011. IBRC is tasked with winding them
down and liquidating their assets. In February, when Irish
lawmakers adopted the Irish Bank Resolution Corp., IBRC was
placed into a special liquidation in the Irish High Court to
complete liquidation and distribution of the two banks' assets.
IBRC's principal asset as of June 2012 was a loan portfolio
valued at some EUR25 billion (US$33.5 billion). About 70 percent
of the loans were to Irish borrowers. Some 5 percent of the
portfolio was under U.S. law, according to a court filing. Total
liabilities in June 2012 were about EUR50 billion, according
to a court filing.
Most assets in the U.S. have been sold already. IBRC is involved
in lawsuits in the U.S.
IBRC was granted protection under Chapter 15 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code in December 2013.
Kieran Wallace and Eamonn Richardson of KPMG have been named the
special liquidators.
=========
I T A L Y
=========
ALITALIA SPA: Creditor Banks Support Etihad's Turnaround Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
Alberto Sisto at Reuters reports that a government source said
Alitalia SpA's creditor banks expressed support for a turnaround
plan put forward by Abu Dhabi's Etihad for the loss-making
Italian airline when they met with Italy's government on
Thursday.
According to Reuters, Alitalia's board was set to make an initial
evaluation of the conditions Etihad has set for investing in the
Rome-based airline at a meeting scheduled for June 6.
Etihad said on June 1 it had set the conditions for a possible
investment and was looking to conclude the deal, which sources
have said could see Etihad pay more than EUR500 million
(US$681.08 million) for a 49% stake in Alitalia, Reuters relates.
Issues including the prospect of major job cuts in Alitalia's
14,000-strong workforce and its EUR800 million debt burden have
been obstacles to the deal, which Italy's government is keen to
complete, Reuters notes.
About Alitalia
Alitalia-Compagnia Aerea Italiana has navigated its way through
a successful restructuring. After filing for bankruptcy
protection in 2008, Alitalia found additional investors, acquired
rival airline Air One, and re-emerged as Italy's leading airline
in early 2009. Operating a fleet of about 150 aircraft, the
airline now serves more than 75 national and international
destinations from hubs in Fiumicino (Rome), Milan, Turin, Venice,
Naples, and Catania. Alitalia extends its network as a member of
the SkyTeam code-sharing and marketing alliance, which also
includes Air France, Delta Air Lines, and KLM. An Italian
investor group owns a majority of the company, while Air France-
KLM owns 25%.
ITALY: Fitch Updates Mortgage Assumptions; Rating Impact Limited
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has updated its criteria assumptions for assessing
credit risk in Italian residential mortgage loan pools. The
updated assumptions are expected to have a limited impact on
existing Italian RMBS ratings and no impact on covered bonds
ratings. Potentially affected ratings will be reviewed within six
months. Most of the agency's assumptions -- including base and
stressed default as well as quick sale assumptions -- have
remained unchanged given Fitch's stable view on the Italian
mortgage and housing market.
Some assumptions have been slightly adjusted based on a
regression analysis conducted on a sample of over 143,000
residential mortgage loans in Italy. The agency has recalibrated
its foreclosure frequency (FF) matrix, some FF adjustments for
specific loan/borrower/property characteristics, and the property
value thresholds of illiquid properties. In particular, the FF
adjustment for non-Italian borrowers has increased, a change
supported by the materially worse observed performance of these
borrowers in Fitch-rated RMBS as compared with Italian nationals.
Fitch has moderated its house price decline (HPD) assumptions
given that the Italian housing market has performed broadly in
line with the agency's expectations. The HPD assumptions at
'AA+sf' remain stable at 43%. Nominal house prices have recently
started flattening, supported by a stabilizing outlook for house
price drivers, including new retail lending volumes and
affordability for new housing transactions. Therefore, Fitch has
slightly reduced its peak-to-trough assumption at 'Bsf' to 20%
from 22%, and as a result now assumes a further house price fall
of 7% from 4Q13 levels. To align its national HPD expectations
with regional ones, Fitch has changed its source of data when
indexing property values. This has also resulted in the
recalibration of its regional market value declines.
Low prepayment stresses have been reduced to 2% in each year
after closing in light of observed trends in Fitch-rated RMBS.
This reflects the stabilization of prepayment rates at low levels
due to the currently low interest rate environment and subdued
new lending.
The application of the revised assumptions is expected to have a
limited effect on existing ratings of Italian RMBS transactions.
There are few transactions with significant exposure to non-
Italian borrowers; therefore the change in related assumptions
will have little effect on the analysis of portfolios. The
revised assumptions on non-Italian borrowers may result in a
lower breakeven asset percentage for Italian covered bonds
programs secured by cover pools with a significant portion of
these loans, albeit no rating impact is expected.
In the review of transactions, Fitch will apply the revised
assumptions but will also consider the historical performance of
the particular loans in question.
MONTE DEI PASCHI: Prices Fundraising at Deep Discount
-----------------------------------------------------
Rachel Sanderson at The Financial Times reports that Monte dei
Paschi di Siena, Italy's third largest bank by assets, has priced
its EUR5 billion fundraising at a deep discount as it seeks to
raise almost twice the value of its market capitalization in the
run up to the European asset quality review and stress tests.
The bank, which has received three state bailouts over the past
five years, priced the issue at EUR1 for each new share,
equivalent to a 35.5% discount to the theoretical share price
accounting for the dilution of new shares, the FT discloses.
The offer period for the capital increase will run from June 9 to
June 20, the FT says. The issue is fully underwritten by a
consortium of 10 banks led by UBS, the FT notes.
According to the FT, with the capital raising, Monte dei Paschi
avoids the threat of nationalization that has been hanging over
the bank for at least the past two years since it received
EUR4.1 billion in bail out bonds from the Italian state.
Stung by the costly acquisition of local rival Antonveneta at the
peak of the financial boom, Monte dei Paschi came close to
collapse when it was subsequently hit by the effect of the
eurozone debt crisis, the FT recounts. Former managers are also
on trial amid allegations of false bookkeeping in an attempt to
hide the scale of its losses from investors, the FT relays.
Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA -- http://www.mps.it/-- is
an Italy-based company engaged in the banking sector. It
provides traditional banking services, asset management and
private banking, including life insurance, pension funds and
investment trusts. In addition, it offers investment banking,
including project finance, merchant banking and financial
advisory services. The Company comprises more than 3,000
branches, and a structure of channels of distribution. Banca
Monte dei Paschi di Siena Group has subsidiaries located
throughout Italy, Europe, America, Asia and North Africa. It has
numerous subsidiaries, including Mps Sim SpA, MPS Capital
Services Banca per le Imprese SpA, MPS Banca Personale SpA, Banca
Toscana SpA, Monte Paschi Ireland Ltd. and Banca MP Belgio SpA.
* * *
As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter-Europe on Sept. 18,
2013, Fitch downgraded MPS's Viability Rating (VR) to 'ccc' from
'b' and removed it from Rating Watch Negative (RWN).
TCR-Europe also reported on June 19, 2013, that Standard & Poor's
Ratings Services lowered its long-term counterparty credit rating
on Italy-based Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA (MPS) to 'B'
from 'BB', and affirmed the 'B' short-term rating. S&P also
lowered its rating on MPS' Lower Tier 2 subordinated notes to
'CCC-' from 'CCC+'. S&P affirmed the ratings on MPS' junior
subordinated debt at 'CCC-' and on its preferred stock at 'C'. At
the same time, S&P removed the ratings from CreditWatch, where it
placed them with negative implications on Dec. 5, 2012.
===================
L U X E M B O U R G
===================
ARDAGH PACKAGING: Moody's Affirms 'B3' Corporate Family Rating
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Ardagh Packaging Group Ltd.'s
corporate family rating (CFR) at B3, and probability of default
rating (PDR) at B3-PD.
Moody's also affirmed the Ba3 ratings on the company's senior
secured notes, Ba3 rating on senior secured bank facilities, Caa1
rating on its senior unsecured notes and Caa1 rating on senior
subordinated notes.
Concurrently, Moody's has assigned a (P)Caa2 rating to the new
USD 1 billion PIK notes (combination of USD and EURO) to be
issued by Ardagh Finance Holdings S.A. (formerly ARD Two S.A.)
with proceeds to be used to (1) refinance Ardagh's existing PIK
notes due 2018, which become callable on June 1, 2014, (2) pay
fees and expenses and (3) fund a c.USD100 million distribution to
shareholders. The outlook on all ratings is stable.
Once the refinancing is complete, Moody's will withdraw the Caa2
rating on the existing PIK notes issued by ARD Finance S.A.
Moody's issues provisional ratings in advance of the final sale
of securities. Upon a conclusive review of the final
documentation, Moody's will endeavor to assign a definitive
rating to the new PIK notes. A definitive rating may differ from
a provisional rating.
Ratings Rationale
The affirmation of Moody's existing ratings firstly reflects the
completion of the acquisition of Veralia North America (VNA) from
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain SA, which Moody's view as a positive
factor for Ardagh positioning the company as a leading glass
container manufacturer in the US. It also provides the
opportunity to drive significant synergies for the overall
business estimated to be in the region of USD75 million over a
three year period. Secondly, Moody's view positively the
announcement that the net proceeds from the disposal of the
Anchor business (expected to complete before the end of
July 2014) will be entirely applied in prepayment of debt. This
will replace the previously anticipated cash equity raise as a
mechanism to deleverage the business.
Moody's is cautiously optimistic over the progress and plans for
profit improvement in Ardagh's European metals business, which
currently comprises around 30% of the group and which materially
underperformed Moody's expectations for 2013. The company is now
implementing an incremental profit improvement plan, which will
require significantly less capital investment than a more
transformational plan to relocate manufacturing plants
(EUR300 million) Although the plan is less transformational,
Moody's expect a recovery in margins in the period 2014-2016,
from the level reached in 2013.
Ardagh's financial metrics remain weak for the B3 rating
category. Moody's expects that adjusted debt/EBITDA will remain
above 6.5x through 2014, even incorporating the assumption that
the company will utilize the proceeds from the disposal of the
Anchor business to prepay debt. Additionally, Moody's expects
free cash flow to remain limited until 2015, with a continued
high level of investment capex on the Group's development
initiatives as projects move to completion in late 2014. Although
the increase in gross debt from the new PIK notes will not
materially increase the group's interest burden, due to the lack
of free cash flow, further expectations of debt prepayment are
entirely contingent upon external funding.
Moody's expects the company's liquidity profile to remain
adequate to meet its near-term funding requirements. Ardagh had
EUR202 million cash available on balance sheet as at March 31,
2014 and EUR252 million available under securitization and
guarantee lines. The group's liquidity profile is further
supported by the fact that it has no material debt maturities
before 2017. The newly issued PIK will improve the liquidity
profile as it does not hold a cash-pay toggle, unlike the
existing PIK notes.
The affirmation of the Ba3 rating on the senior secured notes,
and assignment of (P)Caa2 rating of the PIK notes is in line with
Moody's loss given default methodology. The (P)Caa2 instrument
rating assigned to the proposed PIK Notes reflects the fact that
they are junior to the company's existing debt facilities. The
three notch uplift of the senior secured debt over the CFR
reflects the material debt cushion provided by the unsecured
notes and PIK notes, which in turn are rated one and two notches
respectively below the CFR.
The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that Ardagh will: (1)
stabilize its European metal business in 2014 and improve its
operating profitability; (2) dispose of the Anchor business with
the proceeds being used to prepay debt; (3) enter into no more
debt-financed M&A activity until operational stability has been
achieved in its existing business, with VNA being integrated into
the overall business.
The ratings could come under negative pressure in 2014 if Ardagh
is not able to: (1) demonstrate continued improvements in
profitability in the European metals business; (2) generate
positive free cash flow or; (iii) reduce debt/EBITDA towards
6.5x, including through the use of proceeds from the disposal of
the Anchor business to prepay debt in 2014.
Given Ardagh's current weak positioning in the B3 category,
Moody's does not see any near-term upward pressure on Ardagh's
ratings. However, the ratings could come under positive pressure
should Ardagh be able to reduce debt/EBITDA below 6.0x and
maintain sustained positive free cash flow generation.
The principal methodology used in this rating was the Global
Packaging Manufacturers: Metal, Glass, and Plastic Containers
published in June 2009. Other methodologies used include Loss
Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in
the U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009.
Ardagh Packaging Group, registered in Luxembourg, is a leading
supplier of glass and metal containers. Pro forma for the
acquisition of Verallia North America, the company generated
sales of about EUR4 billion in 2013.
Affirmations:
Issuer: Ardagh Packaging Group Ltd
Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD
Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3
Upgrades:
Issuer: Ardagh Glass Finance plc
Senior Subordinated Regular Bond/Debenture Jun 15, 2017,
Upgraded to a range of LGD5, 71 % from a range of LGD5, 72 %
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Feb 1, 2020, Upgraded to
a range of LGD5, 71 % from a range of LGD5, 72 %
Issuer: Ardagh Holdings USA Inc.
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Dec 17, 2019, Upgraded to a
range of LGD2, 20 % from a range of LGD2, 22 %
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Dec 17, 2019, Upgraded to a
range of LGD2, 20 % from a range of LGD2, 22 %
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Dec 17, 2019, Upgraded to a
range of LGD2, 20 % from a range of LGD2, 22 %
Issuer: Ardagh Packaging Finance plc
Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2017, Upgraded to
a range of LGD2, 20 % from a range of LGD2, 22 %
Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2017, Upgraded to
a range of LGD2, 20 % from a range of LGD2, 22 %
Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2017, Upgraded to
a range of LGD2, 20 % from a range of LGD2, 22 %
Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2017, Upgraded to
a range of LGD2, 20 % from a range of LGD2, 22 %
Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2017, Upgraded to
a range of LGD2, 20 % from a range of LGD2, 22 %
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Jan 31, 2021, Upgraded
to a range of LGD5, 71 % from a range of LGD5, 72 %
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Jan 31, 2019, Upgraded
to a range of LGD5, 71 % from a range of LGD5, 72 %
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2020, Upgraded
to a range of LGD5, 71 % from a range of LGD5, 72 %
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2020, Upgraded
to a range of LGD5, 71 % from a range of LGD5, 72 %
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Nov 15, 2020, Upgraded
to a range of LGD5, 71 % from a range of LGD5, 72 %
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2020, Upgraded
to a range of LGD5, 71 % from a range of LGD5, 72 %
Assignments:
Issuer: Ardagh Finance Holdings S.A
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned (P)Caa2
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned a range of
LGD6, 93 %
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned (P)Caa2
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned a range of
LGD6, 93 %
Outlook Actions:
Issuer: Ardagh Glass Finance plc
Outlook, Remains Stable
Issuer: Ardagh Holdings USA Inc.
Outlook, Remains Stable
Issuer: Ardagh Packaging Finance plc
Outlook, Remains Stable
Issuer: Ardagh Packaging Group Ltd
Outlook, Remains Stable
Affirmations:
Issuer: Ardagh Glass Finance plc
Senior Subordinated Regular Bond/Debenture Jun 15, 2017,
Affirmed Caa1
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Feb 1, 2020, Affirmed
Caa1
Issuer: Ardagh Holdings USA Inc.
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Dec 17, 2019, Affirmed Ba3
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Dec 17, 2019, Affirmed Ba3
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Dec 17, 2019, Affirmed Ba3
Issuer: Ardagh Packaging Finance plc
Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2017, Affirmed Ba3
Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2017, Affirmed Ba3
Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2017, Affirmed Ba3
Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2017, Affirmed Ba3
Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2017, Affirmed Ba3
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Jan 31, 2021, Affirmed
Caa1
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Jan 31, 2019, Affirmed
Caa1
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2020, Affirmed
Caa1
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2020, Affirmed
Caa1
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Nov 15, 2020, Affirmed
Caa1
Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture Oct 15, 2020, Affirmed
Caa1
ARDAGH PACKAGING: S&P Affirms 'B' CCR on Debt Refinancing
---------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said that it affirmed its 'B'
long-term corporate credit ratings on Luxembourg-based glass-
container and metal packaging manufacturer Ardagh Packaging Group
and related entities. The outlook is stable.
At the same time, S&P assigned its issue rating of 'CCC+' to the
proposed $1 billion (about EUR730 million) payment-in-kind (PIK)
notes due 2019, to be issued by Ardagh Finance Holdings S.A. The
recovery rating on these notes is '6', indicating S&P's
expectation of a negligible (0%-10%) recovery prospects in the
event of a payment default.
In addition, S&P affirmed its issue rating of 'B+' on Ardagh's
US$700 million (EUR519 million) senior secured term loan B tap,
due 2022. The recovery rating on this term loan is unchanged at
'2', indicating S&P's expectation of substantial (70%-90%)
recovery in the event of a payment default.
"We affirmed our 'CCC+' issue rating on Ardagh's various
unsecured notes. The recovery rating on these notes is unchanged
at '6', indicating our expectation of negligible (0%-10%)
recovery in the event of a payment default. We also affirmed our
'B+' issue ratings on Ardagh's existing senior secured debt
instruments. The recovery rating on these instruments is
unchanged at '2', indicating our expectation of substantial (70%-
90%) recovery in the event of a payment default," S&P said.
The rating actions follow Ardagh's recent announcement that it is
undertaking a refinancing and debt maturity extension. This
transaction involves the repayment of Ardagh's existing PIK notes
and the payment of a US$100 million shareholder distribution with
the issuance of US$1 billion of new PIK notes. The changes in
the capital structure do not alter S&P's assessment of Ardagh's
financial risk profile as "highly leveraged," with its key
financial metrics remaining commensurate with the current
ratings.
S&P do not expect Ardagh's free operating cash flow generation to
contribute significantly to reducing debt in the near term, nor
do S&P expects the group's Standard & Poor's-adjusted funds from
operations (FFO) to debt to exceed 10%.
Ardagh's "satisfactory" business risk profile reflects the
group's leading market positions in the global glass-container
and metal-packaging markets. The group focuses on the relatively
stable food and beverage end markets. Ardagh remains exposed to
volatile raw material prices and high energy costs, despite its
prudent hedging strategy. The group has expanded aggressively in
recent years with debt-funded acquisitions. Although these
acquisitions have enhanced the group's competitive position and
geographic, end-market, and product diversification, they carry
integration risks, including those related to the realization of
synergies.
Ardagh's "highly leveraged" financial risk profile reflects the
group's highly leveraged capital structure. S&P forecasts that
its adjusted debt to EBITDA will exceed 7x in 2014 and 2015, and
that its free operating cash flow generation will be relatively
weak because its glass operations are capital-intensive.
Ardagh's financial policy has a negative impact on S&P's rating
outcome. S&P considers that there is a risk that Ardagh could
continue its track record of acquisitions, which could entail
higher debt usage than S&P assumes in its base-case scenario.
This could result in weaker credit metrics than S&P forecasts.
S&P's base-case operating scenario for Ardagh assumes:
-- Flat like-for-like sales growth for 2014. This equates to
about 17% on an absolute basis, net of the acquisition of
Verallia North America (VNA), the North American operations
of Compagnie de Saint-Gobain's glass business, and the
disposal of six other U.S. plants.
-- A gradual improvement in margins as the share of Ardagh's
output of high-margin glass-container packaging increases
and it realizes synergies from acquisitions.
-- No major acquisitions or divestitures after the completion
of the VNA acquisition and disposal of six plants.
-- Negative free operating cash flow generation in 2014, on
the back of a working capital outflow and capital
expenditure of above EUR300 million.
Based on these assumptions, S&P arrives at the following credit
measures:
-- FFO to debt of about 5% in 2014; and
-- Debt to EBITDA of above 7x at the same time.
The stable outlook on Ardagh and related entities reflects S&P's
view that Ardagh's credit metrics will remain at levels
commensurate with the 'B' rating in the near term. Specifically,
this means relatively aggressive financial policies and credit
metrics that are likely to remain highly leveraged. The outlook
also takes into account the possibility that synergies related to
the VNA acquisition take longer to realize than S&P anticipates,
and the group's largely debt-funded growth strategy.
S&P could take a positive rating action if it anticipates that
Ardagh will alter its financial policy to focus on deleveraging,
while improving its credit measures to levels S&P considers
commensurate with a 'B+' rating. This could occur if Ardagh
significantly reduces its debt, for example, through an IPO.
S&P could take a negative rating action if Ardagh's credit
measures deteriorate further -- for example, because of further
debt-funded acquisitions, financial underperformance, or
unexpected material shareholder returns. Similarly, S&P could
downgrade Ardagh if the group suffers from liquidity issues.
However, S&P considers these risks to be remote in the near term.
=====================
N E T H E R L A N D S
=====================
CHARGER OPCO: S&P Assigns Prelim. 'BB' LT Corp. Credit Rating
-------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its preliminary 'BB'
long-term corporate credit rating to Charger OpCo B.V., a
Netherlands-based company set up to raise funds for the merger of
the coffee businesses of Mondelez International Inc. and D.E
Master Blenders 1753 B.V. (DEMB) into a combined coffee and tea
company called Jacobs Douwe Egberts. The outlook is stable.
At the same time, S&P assigned its preliminary 'BB' issue rating
to Charger OpCo's senior secured debt facilities, in line with
the corporate credit rating. The recovery rating on these
facilities is '4', indicating S&P's expectation of average (30%-
50%) recovery in the event of default.
The final ratings will be subject to the successful completion of
the refinancing transaction and will depend on S&P's receipt and
satisfactory review of all final refinancing transaction
documentation. Accordingly, the preliminary ratings should not
be construed as evidence of the final ratings. If Standard &
Poor's does not receive the final documentation within a
reasonable timeframe, or if the final documentation departs from
the materials S&P has already reviewed, it reserves the right to
revise or withdraw its ratings.
The 'BB' preliminary corporate credit rating on Charger OpCo
reflects S&P's view of its "satisfactory" business risk profile
and "aggressive" financial risk profile.
The "satisfactory" business risk profile reflects S&P's view of
Jacobs Douwe Egberts' solid market positions in various regional
markets, its varied portfolio of highly recognized brands, and
the generally solid demand for coffee and tea products even in
times of austerity. S&P assess the group's country risk as
"intermediate" given its relatively broad geographical spread of
revenues. S&P assess the risk for the global branded nondurables
industry as "low," reflecting relatively stable demand and
generally solid growth prospects.
S&P believes that Jacobs Douwe Egberts will maintain stable
growth, supported by spending on product development, innovation,
and marketing, and underpinned by relatively solid demand for
coffee and tea products. While S&P understands that the merger
might not close until 2015, it anticipates that the combined
group will generate pro forma revenues of close to EUR5.6 billion
in 2014, with growth in Eastern Europe and Latin America
mitigated by moderate and limited growth in Europe and Australia,
respectively.
S&P believes that ongoing cost and efficiency savings -- which
had a positive impact on the respective merging entities'
earnings in 2013 -- will continue to strengthen profitability.
S&P anticipates that Jacobs Douwe Egberts' Standard & Poor's-
adjusted pro forma EBITDA margin will be in the high teens in
2014 and will continue to increase over the two-to-three years
thereafter. S&P also considers that the group is exposed to
relatively volatile coffee prices, and that to maintain
improvements in profitability, the group would need to handle the
volatility efficiently and be able to pass on price increases to
its consumers. S&P views Jacobs Douwe Egberts' relative reliance
on Europe, which accounts for 75% of the revenue base, as a
weakness compared with the group's peers in the consumer products
market.
S&P's assessment of Jacobs Douwe Egberts' financial risk profile
as "aggressive" reflects its view that although its balance sheet
will be highly leveraged following the refinancing transaction,
this is mitigated by strong interest coverage ratios and
management's commitment to reduce leverage. S&P understands that
the merger of the coffee businesses of Mondelez International and
DEMB will be financed with up to EUR7.6 billion of debt, of which
EUR2.9 billion will be used to refinance the existing debt at
DEMB's holding company Oak Leaf B.V., and about EUR4 billion will
be paid to Mondelez International when the merger is complete.
S&P anticipates that the deal will close in 2015.
S&P believes that Jacobs Douwe Egberts will maintain strong and
sustainable free cash flow generation due to relatively low, but
solid, revenue growth, which combined with ongoing cost savings
and efficiency measures, should result in solid growth in EBITDA.
S&P believes that management's plan to rapidly reduce leverage is
credible because there are restrictions on dividend payments in
the near term, and acquisitions, if any, are likely to be small
during the integration phase of the two merged coffee businesses.
In S&P's view, the cash flow available for debt repayment should
be positive, and management's aim to reduce debt, stipulations in
the loan documentation, and the amortization structure of one of
the term loans should ensure a steady decrease of leverage.
S&P forecasts that the group's adjusted funds from operations
(FFO)-to-debt and net debt-to-EBITDA ratios will strengthen to
13% and close to 5x, respectively, by year-end 2015, from about
9% and more than 6x pro forma the refinancing this year. S&P
anticipates that these ratios will continue to strengthen to more
than 17% and about 4x, respectively, in 2016.
S&P's assessment of the financial risk profile as "aggressive"
reflects not only the strengthening of FFO to debt and debt to
EBITDA, but also very strong interest coverage ratios. S&P
forecasts that EBITDA interest coverage will be 3x-6x over the
forecast period, indicating a stronger financial risk profile.
S&P's base-case operating scenario assumes:
-- Annual growth of sales revenues of about 2%-3%, in line
with the growth S&P anticipates in the coffee industry.
-- Gradually strengthening EBITDA margins, with profitability
benefiting from ongoing cost savings, efficiency measures,
and other initiatives.
-- Annual capex of about 4% of revenues.
-- Solid working capital inflows, as management's focus on the
group's operating working capital results in a cash release
over the next two years.
-- Debt reduction thanks to an excess cash flow sweep, the
amortizing structure of one of the term loans, and
limitations on dividend payments.
Based on these assumptions, S&P arrives at the following credit
measures:
-- EBITDA margins in the high teens in 2014 and strengthening
thereafter.
-- Debt to EBITDA of 6x-7x in 2014, 4.5x-5.0x in 2015, and
3.5x-4.5x in 2016.
-- EBITDA interest coverage of 3.0x-3.5x in 2014, 4.5x-5.0x in
2015, and 5.5x-6.0x in 2016.
The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that Jacobs Douwe Egberts'
credit ratios are likely to strengthen in 2015 from the
relatively weak levels S&P forecasts for the current year pro
forma the refinancing. The outlook also assumes that the merger
will receive regulatory approval without the need for major
divestments and will close as planned in 2015. S&P thinks that
the group's strong EBITDA interest coverage ratios, which
according to its forecasts will exceed 3x over the near term,
mitigate its highly leveraged balance sheet and debt-to-EBITDA
ratio of more than 5x. The stable outlook reflects S&P's opinion
that interest coverage ratios will remain strong and that the
leverage ratio will strengthen in the near term.
Upside scenario
An upgrade is unlikely over the next 12-18 months, as Jacobs
Douwe Egberts' adjusted debt to EBITDA ratio would need to fall
below 4x to justify a higher rating. While S&P assumes that the
merger will close in 2015, it would like to see regulatory
approvals without potential divestments, and evidence of
successful integration without pressure on profitability and cash
flow generation, before considering a higher rating.
Downside scenario
S&P could consider taking a negative rating action if Jacobs
Douwe Egberts' leverage does not decrease as much as it forecasts
over the next 12-18 months. For example, this could result from
asset sales; weaker operating performance, which would put
pressure on the group's earnings and EBITDA; or from higher
capex; a debt-financed acquisition; or a change in the group's
dividend policies.
HEMA BV: S&P Assigns Prelim. 'B+' CCR; Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said that it had assigned its
'B+' preliminary long-term corporate credit rating to the
Netherlands-based general merchandise and food retailer Hema B.V.
The outlook is stable.
At the same time, S&P assigned a 'BB+' preliminary long-term
issue rating and '1+' recovery rating to Hema's EUR80 million
proposed super senior revolving credit facility (RCF) due 2018.
S&P assigned its 'B+' preliminary rating and '3' recovery rating
to the proposed EUR275 million senior secured floating rate notes
and EUR290 million senior secured fixed-rate notes, both due
2019. S&P assigned a 'B-' preliminary rating and '6' recovery
rating to the EUR150 million proposed senior unsecured notes due
2019. S&P understands that the proposed notes will be issued by
special purpose vehicles owned by Dutch Lion B.V., the parent
company of Hema. The proceeds of the notes will then be lent on
to Hema.
The preliminary ratings are subject to the successful issuance of
the RCF and notes, and to S&P's review of the final
documentation. If Standard & Poor's does not receive the final
documentation within a reasonable time frame, or if the final
documentation departs from the materials S&P has already
reviewed, it reserves the right to withdraw or revise its
ratings.
The preliminary rating reflects S&P's view of Hema's "fair"
business risk profile and "highly leveraged" financial risk
profile, resulting in an anchor of 'b'. S&P adjusts the anchor
upward by one notch to account for its positive view of Hema
under S&P's comparable ratings analysis, where it reviews Hema's
credit characteristics in aggregate.
The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that Hema will continue to
improve its market position and pursue a prudent diversification
strategy to expand its operations. Furthermore, S&P considers
that profitability is likely to improve following the company's
implementation of its cost-saving strategy and that Hema should
be able to continue generating positive FOCF and maintain
adequate coverage of debt service costs. Hema's "adequate"
liquidity, as well as its sufficient financial covenant headroom,
should, in S&P's opinion, enable the company to withstand
potential temporary operating setbacks.
S&P don't think it likely that Hema will be able to meaningfully
reduce its total adjusted leverage, owing to the PIK nature of
the shareholder loan.
Ratings upside is limited in the next 12 months. However, S&P
would likely consider a positive rating action if Hema's business
operations grew more strongly than it currently forecasts, on the
back of a successful expansion strategy in other countries, and
translating into a higher business risk profile assessment.
S&P could also consider a positive rating action if Hema's core
leverage ratios improved toward the "aggressive" category. This
would occur if adjusted FFO to debt increased to more than 12%
and adjusted debt to EBITDA fell below 5x.
If Hema's financial policy toward shareholder remuneration became
more aggressive, S&P could consider a downgrade.
S&P could also lower the rating if the company experiences an
unexpected loss of market share or considerable revenue or profit
declines, leading S&P to lower its assessment of its business
risk profile.
S&P could also lower the rating because of lower EBITDA and cash
generation, resulting in FFO cash interest coverage falling below
2x or free cash flow turning negative.
===========
P O L A N D
===========
* POLAND: Corporate Bankruptcies Up in May, Euler Hermes Says
-------------------------------------------------------------
Warsaw Business Journal, citing research and debt collection firm
Euler Hermes Collections, reports that in May, about 79 companies
were declared bankrupt compared to 70 bankruptcies recorded in
the corresponding month of 2013.
The total revenue of the companies that went under last month
stood at PLN1.7 billion and altogether, they employed 4,300
people, WBJ discloses. Most of the companies that were declared
bankrupt were manufacturing firms, WBJ notes. There were also a
significant number of construction companies and service
providers, WBJ states.
In the first five months of 2014, as many as 342 Polish firms
were declared bankrupt, 57 fewer than in the same period of the
previous year, WBJ relays.
According to WBJ, the report said that current bankruptcies are
still the effect of the poor business conditions seen in previous
years.
"Last year, economic uncertainty contributed to the fact that 20
percent of bankruptcies involved company restructuring. In May
of this year, only 10 companies received permission for
restructuring, meanwhile eight restructuring processes initiated
in previous months failed and turned into company liquidation,"
WBJ quotes Grzegorz Hylewicz, director at Euler Hermes, as
saying.
=============
R O M A N I A
=============
OLTCHIM SA: Government Considers All Restructuring Measures
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gabriela Stan at Ziarul Financiar reports that Romanian Prime
Minister Victor Ponta Friday said that all restructuring measures
have been taken so that insolvent chemical company Oltchim SA
would become feasible, as it is eligible for loans.
Oltchim is a Romanian chemical producer. The company has been
under insolvency procedures since January 2013. This came soon
after the state failed to privatize Oltchim in its first
privatization stage, which was won by media mogul Dan Diaconescu.
===========
R U S S I A
===========
MDM BANK: S&P Lowers Counterparty Rating to 'B+'; Outlook Neg.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said that it had lowered its
long-term counterparty credit rating on Russian MDM Bank to 'B+'
from 'BB-' and affirmed the 'B' short-term counterparty credit
rating. The outlook is negative.
At the same time, S&P lowered the Russia national scale rating on
MDM Bank to 'ruA' from 'ruAA-'.
The downgrade reflects continuing pressure on MDM Bank's
financial profile, notably its asset quality and profitability.
S&P believes MDM Bank's market share and capacity to deliver
stable earnings have significantly deteriorated in the past few
years. S&P acknowledges the bank's management's efforts to clean
up the problem loan portfolio and implement a new growth strategy
to improve the bank's risk profile and revenue stability.
However, S&P's expectation is that the negative trends we see for
both economic and industry risks for Russian banks are likely to
negatively affect MDM Bank's credit quality.
S&P revised its assessment of MDM Bank's risk position to "weak"
from "moderate" to reflect the bank's weaker-than-peer's loan-
loss track record. The bank's reduced capital base and weak
earnings capacity led S&P to revise its assessment of the bank's
capital and earnings position to "moderate" from "adequate." S&P
notes, however, that this revised assessment has a neutral impact
on its ratings on MDM Bank.
S&P revised its assessment of MDM Bank's stand-alone credit
profile (SACP) to 'b' from 'b+'. The 'B+' long-term rating
factors in a one-notch uplift, acknowledging the bank's moderate
systemic importance in Russia, notably its strong regional market
shares.
The negative outlook on MDM Bank reflects its vulnerable
financial profile, exacerbated by the negative developments in
the Russian economy and the banking sector. S&P thinks
pronounced slowing of the economy will put additional pressure on
the bank's financial performance, which is already fragile owing
to weak problem portfolio recovery and a sizable share of NPLs in
its legacy portfolio from before the 2008 crisis.
S&P could lower the ratings if it was to revise down its
assessment of potential government support for MDM Bank. This
could happen if S&P observed further significant deterioration of
the bank's market position, particularly in the Siberia region
where the bank's positions have been traditionally stronger.
Additionally, S&P could lower the ratings if it observed further
intensification of operating risks in Russia, leading to a
further deterioration of the loan portfolio quality and to the
creation of additional provisions resulting in our forecast RAC
ratio falling below 5%. S&P could also lower the ratings if the
bank's liquidity position significantly deteriorates.
S&P could revise the outlook to stable if it saw substantial
growth of sustainable new business, together with no further
significant deterioration of the loan portfolio's quality,
resulting in stable earnings generation and improvement of the
bank's market position. A prerequisite for this would be abating
economic and industry risks for the Russian banking sector as a
whole, however.
NIZHNY NOVGOROD: S&P Withdraws 'BB' LT Issuer Credit Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'BB' long-term
issuer credit rating and 'ruAA' Russia national scale rating on
the Russian City of Nizhny Novgorod. S&P subsequently withdrew
the ratings at the issuer's request. At the time of the
withdrawal, the outlook was stable.
Rationale
Prior to withdrawal, the ratings on the Russian City of Nizhny
Novgorod were constrained by what S&P views as Russia's
"developing and unbalanced" institutional framework, and the
city's modest wealth levels and concentrated economic base,
limited budgetary flexibility and predictability, and "negative"
financial management in an international context. The city's
moderate budgetary performance, low debt levels, and limited
contingent liabilities supported the ratings. S&P assessed its
liquidity position as "neutral" for its creditworthiness.
At the time of withdrawal, the stable outlook on Nizhny Novgorod
reflected S&P's view that the continued inflow of operating and
capital transfers from the oblast would help Nizhny Novgorod meet
its need to increase expenditure and support its budgetary
performance at moderate levels. S&P assumed that the city would
maintain its existing liquidity policy, and that liquidity would
remain "neutral" over the medium term.
In accordance with S&P's relevant policies and procedures, the
Rating Committee was composed of analysts that are qualified to
vote in the committee, with sufficient experience to convey the
appropriate level of knowledge and understanding of the
methodology applicable. At the onset of the committee, the chair
confirmed that the information provided to the Rating Committee
by the primary analyst had been distributed in a timely manner
and was sufficient for Committee members to make an informed
decision.
After the primary analyst gave opening remarks and explained the
recommendation, the Committee discussed key rating factors and
critical issues in accordance with the relevant criteria.
Qualitative and quantitative risk factors were considered and
discussed, looking at track-record and forecasts. The chair
ensured every voting member was given the opportunity to
articulate his/her opinion. The chair or designee reviewed the
draft report to ensure consistency with the Committee decision.
The views and the decision of the rating committee are summarized
in the above rationale and outlook.
RATINGS LIST
Ratings Affirmed Then Withdrawn
To From
Nizhny Novgorod (City of)
Issuer Credit Rating N.R.
BB/Stable/--
Russia National Scale N.R. ruAA/--/--
N.R.-Not rated.
===============
S L O V E N I A
===============
ACH: Power Struggle Ends Amid Bankruptcy Threat
-----------------------------------------------
STA reports that a bitter power struggle at conglomerate ACH
appears to have ended on Friday as the indebted company got a new
chairman and chief supervisor following weeks of uncertainty that
threatened to push it into bankruptcy.
ACH is one of Slovenia's biggest companies.
=========
S P A I N
=========
CAIXA PENEDES 1: S&P Lowers Rating on Class C Notes to 'BB'
-----------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services took various credit rating
actions in CAIXA PENEDES 1 TDA Fondo de Titulizacion de Activos
and CAIXA PENEDES 2 TDA, Fondo de Titulizacion de Activos.
Specifically, S&P has raised its rating on:
-- the class A notes, affirmed its rating on the class B
notes, and lowered its rating on the class C notes in CAIXA
PENEDES 1; and
-- the class A notes, affirmed its rating on the class B
notes, and lowered its rating on the class C notes in CAIXA
PENEDES 2.
The rating actions follow S&P's review of the transactions'
collateral credit quality and its assessment of counterparty
risk. S&P's ratings on the notes also reflect its analysis of the
evolution of the transaction's structural features for which S&P
applied its cash flow criteria for European residential mortgage-
backed securities (RMBS) transactions. For each transaction, S&P
has used the latest available portfolio and structural features
information from the April 2014 trustee investor report.
Arrears of more than 90 days in CAIXA PENEDES 1 and 2, excluding
defaults (loans delinquent for 12 months or longer), represent
1.63% and 1.44%, respectively, of the outstanding nondefaulted
pool balance, compared with 0.54% and 0.32% in April 2013.
Despite the increase, arrears levels are well below those in
S&P's Spanish RMBS index.
As of end-March 2014, the cumulative defaults over the original
loan balance ratios were 2.36% for CAIXA PENEDES 1 and 1.43% for
CAIXA PENEDES 2. Both transactions have a combined interest and
principal priority of payments with deferral triggers based on
cumulative gross defaults. If the transactions breach their
triggers (4.90% and 5.00% for the class C notes in CAIXA PENEDES
1 and CAIXA PENEDES 2, respectively), they will divert interest
on the subordinated notes to amortize the senior notes'
principal. In S&P's view, both transactions are unlikely to
breach their triggers. S&P expects cumulative defaults to
continue to increase, as long-term delinquencies roll into
defaults.
As of the April interest payment date, the reserve funds in both
transactions, which the subordinated notes fully funded at
closing, are at their documented required levels and represent
2.15% and 4.68% of the outstanding notes' balance in CAIXA
PENEDES 1 and CAIXA PENEDES 2, respectively.
In CAIXA PENEDES 1, the available credit enhancement (based on
the performing balance, including arrears of up to 90 days plus
the reserve balance) is 12.87%, 6.65%, and 2.15% for the class A,
B, and C notes, respectively. In CAIXA PENEDES 2, the available
credit enhancement for the class A, B, and C notes is 11.40%,
9.36%, and 4.68%, respectively.
In both transactions, the trustee, on behalf of the issuer,
entered into an interest swap contract with JP Morgan Chase Bank
N.A. to mitigate any basis and interest risk due to the pool's
various indexes and the notes' reference interest rate. The
issuer pays the swap counterparty a combination of the past 12
month's EURIBOR (Euro Interbank Offered Rate) and IRPH (¡ndice de
referencia de prestamos hipotecarios) multiplied by the balance
of the performing loans. The issuer receives three-month EURIBOR
on the performing balance of the loans minus 0.10% in CAIXA
PENEDES 1 and minus 0.068% in CAIXA PENEDES 2. The replacement
mechanisms and minimum required ratings in the transactions'
documents are in line with S&P's current counterparty criteria.
Therefore, under S&P's criteria, the maximum potential rating on
the notes that a counterparty can support in both transactions is
'AAA (sf)'.
On May 23, 2014, S&P raised its long- and short-term foreign and
local currency sovereign ratings on Spain. Under S&P's
nonsovereign ratings criteria, the maximum rating differential
between its ratings on the sovereign in which the underlying
assets are based and S&P's ratings in the transaction is up to
six notches. Therefore, S&P's criteria cap the maximum potential
rating in CAIXA PENEDES 1 and 2 at 'AA (sf)'. S&P has therefore
raised to 'AA (sf)' from 'AA- (sf)' its ratings on the class A
notes in both transactions following S&P's recent rating action
on Spain and the application of its nonsovereign ratings
criteria.
S&P has also affirmed its 'A (sf)' and 'AA- (sf)' ratings on
CAIXA PENEDES 1 and 2's class B notes, respectively as the
available credit enhancement and performance of the notes is
commensurate with S&P's currently assigned ratings.
In S&P's view, the class C notes in both transactions can no
longer maintain their currently assigned ratings due to the
increase in severe delinquencies over the last year. Given that
payment on the class C notes' principal in both transactions is
subordinated to payments on the more senior notes' principal, S&P
considers the class C notes to be more sensitive to its stress
assumptions than the other classes. S&P has therefore lowered to
'BB (sf)' from 'BBB (sf)' and to 'BBB (sf)' from 'BBB+ (sf)' its
ratings on the class C notes in CAIXA PENEDES 1 and CAIXA PENEDES
2, respectively.
CAIXA PENEDES 1 and 2 are Spanish RMBS transactions, which closed
in November 2006 and September 2007, respectively. They
securitize two portfolios of residential mortgage loans. The
loans are secured over Spanish properties, mainly in Catalonia
(98.22%; 97.41% of the balance of the outstanding pool). CAIXA
PENEDES, now merged with Banco Sabadell S.A., originated the
loans and is the servicer.
POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED CRITERIA CHANGES
These ratings are based on S&P's applicable criteria, including
those set out in the criteria article "Nonsovereign Ratings That
Exceed EMU Sovereign Ratings: Methodology And Assumptions,"
published on June 14, 2011. However, please note that these
criteria are under review.
As a result of this review, S&P's future criteria applicable to
ratings above the sovereign may differ from its current criteria.
This potential criteria change may affect the ratings on all
outstanding notes in this transaction. S&P will continue to rate
and surveil these notes using its existing criteria.
RATINGS LIST
Class Rating Rating
To From
CAIXA PENEDES 1 TDA Fondo de Titulizacion de Activos
EUR1 Billion Mortgage-Backed Floating-Rate Notes
Rating Raised
A AA (sf) AA- (sf)
Rating Affirmed
B A (sf)
Rating Lowered
C BB (sf) BBB (sf)
CAIXA PENEDES 2 TDA, Fondo de Titulizacion de Activos
EUR750 Million Mortgage-Backed Floating-Rate Notes
Rating Raised
A AA (sf) AA- (sf)
Rating Affirmed
B AA- (sf)
Rating Lowered
C BBB (sf) BBB+ (sf)
PYMES SANTANDER 8: DBRS Assigns 'C' Rating to Series C Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Ratings Limited has released a Rating Report on FTA PYMES
SANTANDER 8, which was assigned its final ratings on May 20,
2014.
Issuer Debt Rated Rating Action Rating
------ ---------- ------------- ------
FTA PYMES
SANTANDER 8 Series A Notes Provis.-Final A (sf)
Series B Notes Provis.-Final BB (high)(sf)
Series C Notes Provis.-Final C (sf)
PYMES SANTANDER 9: DBRS Assigns 'CCC' Rating to Series B Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Ratings Limited has released a Rating Report on FTA PYMES
Santander 9, which was assigned its final ratings on May 20,
2014.
Issuer Debt Rated Rating Action Rating
------ ---------- ------------- ------
FTA PYMES
SANTANDER 9 Series A Notes Provis.-Final AA (sf)
Series B Notes Provis.-Final CCC (high)(sf)
===========
S W E D E N
===========
MUNTERS AB: S&P Assigns 'B' Corp. Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said it assigned its 'B' long-
term corporate credit rating to Sweden-based air treatment
solutions provider Munters AB. The outlook is stable.
At the same time, S&P assigned its 'B' issue rating to Munters'
US$280 million senior secured term loan and US$45 million
revolving credit facility (RCF). The recovery rating on the loan
is '3', indicating S&P's expectation of meaningful (50%-70%)
recovery in the event of a payment default.
The ratings reflect S&P's assessments of Munters' "highly
leveraged" financial risk profile and "weak" business risk
profile, as defined in our criteria.
The ratings on Munters are constrained by S&P's view of the
company's "highly leveraged" financial risk profile and its
assessment of its financial policy as FS (financial sponsor)-6,
based on Munters' private equity ownership. S&P excludes the
Swedish krona (SEK) 2.6 billion shareholder loan from its debt
calculation, as S&P considers that it qualifies as equity under
its criteria. It is deeply subordinated to all existing and
future debt instruments, and no mandatory cash payments can be
associated with this instrument. S&P therefore expects Munters'
credit metrics to be in the lower end of its "highly leveraged"
financial risk profile assessment, with debt to EBITDA at about
5.5x (including S&P's standard adjustments for operating leases).
A key strength, in S&P's opinion, is Munters' likely ability to
generate positive free operating cash flow (FOCF) in the near to
medium term. S&P forecasts FOCF of roughly SEK40 million
(US$6 million), in 2014, and higher than SEK100 million in 2015
and thereafter.
"We assess Munters' business risk as "weak." We consider that the
company's limited scale and scope of operations and its lower-
than-average profitability in a global comparison constrain its
business risk. Still, management has engaged in initiatives to
improve margins, but we will not factor them in until we observe
a positive track record. We believe that these weaknesses are
mitigated by Munters' solid market positions in its major niche
markets, coupled with its good end markets and geographic
diversification. It has longstanding customer relationships,
which in our view offset some of the business' exposure to
cyclicality. Furthermore, we believe Munters' growth potential
in several of its business units is sound, which could lead to
higher growth than in our base case, if management is successful
with its ongoing strategic initiatives," S&P said.
In S&P's base case, it assumes:
-- Revenue growth of about 5%, predominantly on increased
service revenues, new product offerings, and price and
volume increases.
-- EBITDA margin of about 9.0%-9.5%, slightly better than the
2013 figure because of less one-off costs.
-- Capital expenditures of about SEK80 million to SEK100
million.
-- No further acquisitions beyond those to which Munters has
already committed.
Based on these assumptions, S&P arrives at the following credit
measures:
-- Debt to EBITDA at about 5.5x excluding the shareholder
loan.
-- Adjusted EBITDA of SEK360 million-SEK390 million.
-- FOCF of SEK40 million-SEK60 million, improving to SEK100
million-SEK150 million in 2014.
The stable outlook reflects S&P's opinion that Munters should
continue to generate FOCF over 2014-2015, based on S&P's
assumption that the company will gradually improve its operating
performance and control expansionary investments in capital
expenditures and working capital. S&P expects fully adjusted
debt to EBITDA of about 5.5x, in line with the current rating.
S&P could consider a positive rating action if Munters' debt to
EBITDA moves consistently below 5x, which could be consistent
with a higher rating, if the company simultaneously continues to
generate FOCF and liquidity remains at least "adequate."
Furthermore, if the company delivers revenue growth above S&P's
current base case and at the same time improves profitability,
with EBITDA margins wider than 12%, this could gradually lead to
rating upside, assuming Munters uses the resulting higher cash
flow to reduce debt.
S&P could lower the ratings if unexpected adverse operating
developments were to occur, such as a sharp economic downturn in
the global economy that affects Munters' end markets. The
ratings could come under pressure if the group's EBITDA margin
approaches 7%, or FOCF turns negative as a result of any
operating shortfalls, adverse working capital swings, or if the
non-cash-paying shareholder loan was replaced by a cash-paying
instrument. Furthermore, any breach of the financial covenants
could weigh negatively on the ratings.
=====================
S W I T Z E R L A N D
=====================
DUFRY AG: Moody's Affirms Ba3 Corp. Family Rating; Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Ba3 corporate family
rating (CFR), Ba3-PD probability of default rating (PDR) of Dufry
AG and the Ba3 senior unsecured notes of Dufry Finance S.C.A.
following the announcement that the company has signed a
definitive agreement for the acquisition of 100% of The Nuance
Group AG (Nuance, B2 Rating Under Review). The outlook on the
ratings is stable.
"The deal has clear industrial logic as its completion will
create the world's leading operator in the travel retail
industry," says Lola Cavanilles, Moody's Assistant Vice
President -- Analyst and lead analyst for Dufry. "However, the
improvement in qualitative factors will be somewhat offset by
weaker credit metrics, at least in the medium term," adds
Ms.Cavanilles.
Dufry will acquire Nuance for an enterprise value of CHF1,550
million through Dufry Financial Services B.V., an acquisition
vehicle incorporated in the Netherlands that is a 100% subsidiary
of Dufry International AG. The acquired entities will be financed
through a combination of debt (at least CHF550 million bond) and
equity (mandatory convertible notes of CHF275 million and a
CHF725 million rights issue). Nuance's existing EUR200 million
bond will be repaid within six months after closing of the
transaction and its CHF420 million bank credit facility will be
refinanced. Dufry's current revolving credit facility and term
loans will also be refinanced, extending the first maturity to
2019.
Moody's assumption in affirming the rating is that Dufry will
successfully launch a capital increase of CHF1,000 million in
order to complete the acquisition.
Ratings Rationale
The transaction will enhance Dufry's geographical footprint,
providing it with a balanced geographic portfolio that holds
strong positions in mature and emerging markets. Nuance's
portfolio complements and strengthens Dufry's presence in
strategic regions and the combined entity will benefit from a
leading position in Europe and Latin America, as well as
strengthened growth potential in Asia.
The improved business profile is offset with a somewhat higher
leverage, which will position Dufry initially very weakly in the
Ba3 rating category following the completion of this transaction.
At the end of 2013, Dufry's gross debt/EBITDA ratio (on a
standalone basis) stood at 5.3x and its EBITA/interest expense
ratio was around 1.9x (both Moody's adjusted). Post transaction,
Moody's expects that these ratios will deteriorate to 5.7x and
1.6x respectively and it won't be until the end of 2016 that the
company will be able to return to 2013 levels. Therefore, the
rating incorporates the expectation that external growth will be
limited at Dufry group until leverage has reached a level that
would be more commensurate with the Ba3 rating.
What Could Change The Rating -- Up/Down
Dufry's ratings could be upgraded if the company continues to
improve its geographical reach, sustains the current growth in
its profits and reduces its indebtedness, with debt/EBITDA
decreasing below 4x, on a sustainable basis.
Dufry's rating could be downgraded if the company experiences
operational weakness, difficulties in integrating Nuance or
pursues an aggressive growth strategy such that its Moody's-
adjusted debt/EBITDA ratio remains above 5.5x and EBITA/interest
expense remains below 1.6x for a prolonged period.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was the Global
Retail Industry published in June 2011. Other methodologies used
include Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial
Companies in the U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009.
DUFRY AG: Fitch Revises Outlook to Neg. & Affirms 'BB' IDR
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has revised Dufry AG's Outlook to Negative from
Stable and affirmed its Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB'.
Fitch has also affirmed Dufry Finance S.C.A.'s senior unsecured
notes rating at 'BB'.
The rating actions follow Dufry's announcement that it is
acquiring the Nuance Group. The affirmation reflects the overall
positive impact the acquisition should have on Dufry's operations
and expanded geographic footprint. However, the revision of the
Outlook to Negative reflects the anticipated temporary weakening
of credit metrics in FY14 and FY15 relating to the increased
indebtedness from the new bond issue and a possible longer term
drawing under the bridge facility ahead of the new equity
placement, as well as the initial operating margin dilution.
Although Dufry's business model will remain capable of generating
large free cash flow (FCF), a commitment to pursue a more
conservative financial strategy will be critical to assess the
future outlook trend.
Key Rating Drivers
Market Leadership and Business Scale Strengthened
The acquisition of Nuance materially increases Dufry's market
leadership and scope of operations. In the travel retail
industry, Fitch views this as paramount for maintaining high
quality of concessions and deriving an increasing amount of
operational efficiencies.
Increased Footprint in Strategically Important Regions
Dufry will benefit from Nuance's complementary presence in the
Mediterranean region, Asia and the US. Given that over 80% of
Dufry's pipeline projects involve new concessions and expansions
in these geographies, Fitch views the complementary geographic
nature of the transaction as highly accretive to Dufry's long-
term business development goals.
Impact on Concession Portfolio Mixed
The acquisition will allow Dufry to expand and diversify its
concession portfolio and add a number of profitable contracts. We
note an overall shorter concession lifetime and a higher share of
concessions with maximum guaranteed payments will slightly
elevate Dufry's operating leverage. However, given Dufry's
historically high concession renewal rates of 80%, the curtailed
concession lifetime does not materially diminish business
visibility. We expect the average profitability of Nuance's
concessions to converge with that of Dufry's through
discontinuation of less profitable contracts and renegotiation of
new concessions with predominantly variable fee structures.
Fitch also notes the unprofitable Australian operations of
Nuance, although these are not deemed as strategically important
to Dufry, with most of the unprofitable concessions expiring over
the next quarters.
Operating Cash Generation Constrained By Weaker Profitability
Given Nuance's weaker profitability, the acquisition will
sustainably compress Dufry's EBITDA margins by 1%-2% below the
historical average of 14%. As a result, Fitch estimates the
forecast funds from operations (FFO) as a percentage of sales
will be consistently below historical levels of 11%-12% by 2-3%.
However, in the absence of any major incremental capital spend
above the company's target of 3.5% of sales, free cash flow
generation is projected to remain strong and expand over the
rating horizon. We also note that even with lower profitability,
Dufry would still rank among the top performers in the travel
retail sector such as World Duty Free.
Credit Metrics to Come Under Pressure in FY 14-15
As a result of the acquisition, Fitch expects FCF as a percentage
of sales to drop to below 4%, with FFO adjusted leverage after
consideration of dividends paid to associates close to 6.0x by
the end of FY14 (based on the actual contribution from Nuance in
2H14) and remain above 5.5x in FY 2015. We consider the
deterioration in credit metrics will be temporary, limited to the
business integration period, which is expected to be restored in
FY16 once the combined business has started generating normalized
levels of cash flow.
If FFO adjusted gross leverage remains sustainably above 5.5x,
for example as a result of a more onerous integration process,
weaker FCF or a delay in the equity placement as part of the
financing package, this could put pressure on the rating.
Further Debt-Funded Acquisitions Likely
In the consolidating and highly competitive travel retail
industry, we expect acquisitions will remain an essential route
to delivering growth and protecting profitability. As long as
future acquisitions are accretive to Dufry's internal cash
generation and the company remains disciplined about its
financial policy, Fitch continues to factor small add-on
acquisitions into the ratings.
LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE
Fitch expects Dufry to maintain comfortable liquidity given the
company's continuously strong FCF generation, absence of
principal repayments until 2019 after the debt refinancing and
augmented liquidity reserves under the new undrawn RCF of
CHF900m.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Negative: Future developments that could lead to negative rating
action include:
-- FFO adjusted leverage staying around 5.0x in the medium term
suggesting an adverse shift in the operating environment,
persisting organic issues and/or continuing appetite for
debt-funded acquisitions
-- EBITDA margin below 12% coupled with FCF margin below 4.0%,
both on a sustainable basis
-- FFO fixed charge cover sustainably below 2.5x
Positive: Although an upgrade is unlikely before 2015, future
developments that could lead to positive rating action include:
-- FFO adjusted leverage reducing to below 4.0x and fixed charge
cover rising above 3.0x on a sustainable basis
NUANCE GROUP: Moody's Places 'B2' CFR on Review for Upgrade
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has placed the B2 corporate family
rating (CFR) and B2-PD Probability of Default Rating (PDR) of The
Nuance Group AG (Nuance) and the B2 senior secured notes of
Stampos B.V. on review for upgrade, following the announcement
that Dufry AG (Dufry, Ba3 stable) has signed a definitive
agreement to acquire 100% of Nuance.
"The deal has clear industrial logic as its completion will
create the world's leading operator in the travel retail
industry," says Lola Cavanilles, Moody's Assistant Vice
President -- Analyst and lead analyst for Nuance. "We expect that
the review will lead to an upgrade of Nuance's ratings by two
notches to Ba3, in line with the credit quality of the combined
Dufry/Nuance entity. We will likely conclude Moody's review when
the transaction is complete, at which time we would expect to
withdraw the ratings."
Dufry will acquire Nuance for an enterprise value of CHF1,550
million through Dufry Financial Services B.V., an acquisition
vehicle incorporated in the Netherlands that is a 100% subsidiary
of Dufry International AG. The acquired entities will be financed
through a combination of debt (at least CHF550 million bond) and
equity (mandatory convertible notes of CHF275 million and a
CHF725 million rights issue). Nuance's existing EUR200 million
bond will be repaid within six months after closing of the
transaction and the CHF420 million bank credit facility will be
refinanced. Dufry's current revolving credit facility and term
loans will also be refinanced, extending the first maturity to
2019.
Being subject to customary regulatory approval and closing
conditions, Moody's expects that this transaction will close by
the third calendar quarter of 2014.
Ratings Rationale
The transaction will enhance the combined Dufry/Nuance group's
geographical footprint, providing it with a balanced geographic
portfolio that holds strong positions in mature and emerging
markets. Nuance's portfolio complements and strengthens Dufry's
presence in strategic regions and the combined entity will
benefit from a leading position in Europe and Latin America, as
well as strengthened growth potential in Asia.
The improved business profile of the combined Dufry/Nuance group
is offset by the somewhat higher leverage, which will position
Dufry initially very weakly in the Ba3 rating category following
the completion of this transaction. At the end of 2013, Dufry's
gross debt/EBITDA ratio (on a standalone basis) stood at 5.3x and
its EBITA/interest expense ratio was around 1.9x (both Moody's
adjusted). Post transaction, Moody's expects that (1) these
ratios will deteriorate to 5.7x and 1.6x, respectively; and (2)
the company will be unlikely to return to 2013 levels until the
end of 2016. Therefore, the rating incorporates the expectation
that external growth will be limited at the Dufry group until
leverage has reached a level that would be more commensurate with
the Ba3 rating.
In its review process for Nuance's ratings, Moody's will be
evaluating (1) the transaction's final legal structure; (2) its
effect on Nuance' standalone ratings; and (3) the potential for
successful execution of the integration process in line with the
plan outlined by Dufry.
What Could Change The Rating -- Up/Down
Nuance's ratings will be upgraded at the completion of the
transaction to reflect the credit quality of the combined entity.
At the same time, Nuance's standalone ratings are expected to be
withdrawn.
Downward pressure on Nuance's ratings could also arise if the
transaction is not completed and Nuance's standalone leverage
metric were to increase beyond 6.0x, which could occur either as
a result of lower travel spending or less favorable terms for
concession contracts.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was the Global
Retail Industry published in June 2011. Other methodologies used
include Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial
Companies in the U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009.
===========================
U N I T E D K I N G D O M
===========================
EUROSAIL-UK: Moody's Raises Rating on EUR30.33MM Notes to Caa3
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the class A2a, A3a and B1a
and affirmed the class C1a and D1a notes ratings in Eurosail-UK
2007-6NP PLC following the execution of a restructuring.
LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS:
Issuer: Eurosail-UK 2007-6NC PLC
EUR111.14M A2a Notes, Upgraded to Aa2 (sf); previously on
Dec 21, 2010 Downgraded to Ba1 (sf)
EUR170.53M A3a Notes, Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on
Nov 25, 2008 Downgraded to B2 (sf)
EUR30.33M B1a Notes, Upgraded to Caa3 (sf); previously on
Dec 21, 2010 Downgraded to Ca (sf)
EUR21.67M C1a Notes, Affirmed Ca (sf); previously on Dec 21,
2010 Downgraded to Ca (sf)
EUR18.1M D1a Notes, Affirmed Ca (sf); previously on Dec 21,
2010 Downgraded to Ca (sf)
Ratings Rationale
The restructuring, implemented in February 2014, included the
redenomination of all notes, the application of cash receipts
relating to the claims against the original swap counterparties
and the partial write-down of the mezzanine and junior notes. For
additional restructuring items, please refer to the end of this
press release.
The restructuring aims to mitigate the deal's exposure to
foreign-exchange risk, present since the event of default on the
swap agreement that the bankruptcy filing of Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc. triggered in 2008.
Rating Drivers For Class A Notes
The rating upgrades of the class A2a and A3a notes reflect the
redenomination from euro (EUR) to British pound sterling (GBP)
and repayment of the class A3a notes through the application of
cash receipts. The class A2a and A3a notes have been
redenominated GBP from EUR at a conversion rate of 1.2173
EUR/GBP, thereby eliminating the cross-currency risk and the
potential for future build-up of under-collateralization that the
depreciation of GBP to EUR could cause.
The cash receipts relating to the claims against the swap
counterparties have been applied towards the repayment of the
outstanding notes, and together with the termination of the swap
replacement obligation resulted in faster repayment of the notes.
Rating Drivers For Class B, C And D Notes
The B1a notes benefit from the restructuring of the transaction,
which eliminates the potential for future build-up of under-
collateralization caused by the transaction being un-hedged.
Moody's upgrade of the class B1a and affirmation of the classes
C1a and D1a notes take into consideration the losses resulting
from the tranche write-down as well as any future losses to be
incurred due to collateral performance. Class B1a, C1a and D1a
notes suffered write-downs of 10% of their original principal
balance following the restructuring. Moody's believes that the
expected recovery rate on the Class B1a, C1a and D1a notes is
consistent with the revised ratings. Moody's determined that the
ratings of the class B1a, C1a and D1a notes are compliant with
its publication "Moody's Approach to Rating Structured Finance
Securities in Default" dated November 2009.
Other Considerations
Moody's review of transaction's collateral indicated stable
performance, and as such, it did not revise any of its key
collateral assumptions.
Moody's rating analysis also took into consideration the exposure
of the notes to the issuer account bank Danske Bank A/S (Danske -
Baa1/P-2), acting through its London branch. Moody's has assessed
that the revised ratings are consistent with that risk of the
probability and effect of a default of Danske on the issuer's
ability to meet its obligations under the transaction.
List of Additional Restructuring Items
Amendment to the margin of the notes:
The margins of the class B1a were amended to 160 bps, the class
C1a to 225 bps and the class D1a notes to 385 bps.
Amendment to the priority of payments:
Interest payment to the class A3a became subordinated to the
payment of interest to the class A2a and both classes now have
separate principal deficiency ledgers.
Introduction of liquidity reserve fund:
Liquidity reserve fund of GBP1.8 million is available to cover
interest shortfall on the class A2a and A3a notes.
Amendment of reserve fund level and required target amount:
The reserve fund required amount was reduced to GBP1.8 million
from GBP9.3 million. The reserve fund will be allowed to amortize
to the lower of (1) GBP1.8 million; or (2) 1.2% of the
outstanding notes balance, subject to certain conditions. The
conditions are: the reserve fund being at its required target and
delinquencies which are 90 days or more overdue not exceeding
22.5% of the outstanding mortgage balance. Amounts released
following amortization of the reserve fund will be used to pay
additional interest to class D1a notes.
Waiver of account bank trigger breach:
The noteholders agreed to waive the trigger breach of Danske
acting as the transaction's account bank. As a result, Danske
will continue to act as the transaction's account bank, even
though it has a short-term rating of Prime-2, below the Prime-1
rating originally required for the issuer account bank.
Termination of the PECO:
The relevant parties agreed to terminate the Post Enforcement
Call Option agreement (PECO).
The principal methodology used in this rating was Moody's
Approach to Rating RMBS Using the MILAN Framework published in
March 2014.
Factors That Would Lead To An Upgrade Or Downgrade Of The Rating:
Upward pressure could develop on the ratings following (1)
stronger underlying asset performance, beyond Moody's
expectations; (2) further deleveraging with a build-up of credit
enhancement; or (3) the improvement of the creditworthiness of
the transaction's main counterparties.
Downward pressure could develop on the ratings following (1)
underlying collateral performance that is worse than Moody's
expects; or (2) deterioration in the creditworthiness of the
transaction's main counterparties.
FAIRHOLD SECURITISATION: Fitch Cuts Rating on Cl. B Notes to CCC
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded Fairhold Securitisation Limited's
class A and B notes, as follows:
GBP413.7 million class A due October 2017 (XS0298926360)
downgraded to 'Bsf' from 'BBBsf'; Outlook Negative
GBP29.8 million class B due October 2017 (XS0298927509)
downgraded to 'CCCsf' from 'BBsf'; Recovery Estimate 0%
Key Rating Drivers
The downgrade reflects the difficulties Fitch expects the
borrower will face if it seeks to bring about an orderly
refinancing of the sheltered housing ground rent portfolio in
time for loan maturity. The loan interest step-up, which is
designed to motivate a refinancing, has applied since October
2012. Fitch is not aware of any attempts by the sponsor to secure
a refinancing, and expects that the availability and/or cost of
refinancing would struggle to compete with the terms of the debt
in place.
The borrower vehicle is highly geared, with interest service
currently topped up by drawing on a deposit made at closing.
Replicating this capital structure, which provides financing on a
remarkably low risk premium, will not be possible without a
return to an environment similar to before the economic downturn.
Refinancing will consequently be predicated on an injection of
fresh equity by the sponsor. At the same time, there is little
market-based evidence to support the premise that the sponsor has
existing equity to protect; or -- assuming there is equity - that
protecting it would hinge on the sponsor repaying the loan by
2015 maturity. Instead, it may seek to apply for debt forbearance
given the alternative, namely to enforce the mortgage security,
could risk losses for all creditors (including the swap
counterparties).
The class A notes and the swaps rank pari passu in the issuer
post-enforcement waterfall. If the loan were to default, causing
a swap termination payment to be payable by the issuer, this
would likely lead to issuer default. Therefore in any
restructuring these creditors can be expected to club together to
extract the best possible terms for themselves at the expense of
the class B notes. The class B notes appear to be most at risk of
a distressed debt exchange in these circumstances, which is
reflected in the downgrade to a distressed rating category and
the zero Recovery Estimate (RE) in the event of bond default.
The transaction is a single-borrower securitization of freehold
RPI-linked ground rents and transfer fees derived from a
portfolio of sheltered housing located in the UK and encumbered
by long leasehold interests. The variability of the inflation
linked ground rents was stripped out by long-term RPI swaps,
while the floating rate debt was hedged over a similar term using
interest rate swaps.
Given the extraordinarily high quality of the ground rents (if
not the transfer fees), the intention had been to lock in the
long-term cost of financing to a long-term stream of quasi-
certain cash flows. As interest rates fell and long-term
inflation expectations rose in the UK over the downturn, the
issuer's swap position rapidly moved out of the money (the
aggregate mark-to-market (MTM) liability as at February 2014 was
GBP270 million). However, these forces also caused the property
valuation to increase.
Nevertheless the aggregate loan-to-value ratio rose markedly over
the same period. This is because the cost of financing relates
not only to LIBOR (which is capable of being hedged) but also to
the risk premium, which was not hedged and was assumed to have
risen for the property portfolio as it did across a range of
illiquid asset classes. This effect has not receded to previous
levels, nor is it likely to.
As refinancing on the existing terms can be largely discounted,
and the motivation for the sponsor to inject fresh equity is
unclear, the outcome at loan maturity is difficult to predict
with confidence. The various parties' objectives (and possible
cross-holdings) are not known. Moreover, there are only three
years until note maturity in 2017. The Negative Outlook on the
class A notes denotes the risk that they also share in any
economic loss.
If the issuer security trustee pursued enforcement, with the
collateral marketed for sale, in Fitch's view this should be
limited to a scenario in which losses are avoided for the class A
notes and swaps. This would hinge on the collateral value being
close to the amount estimated by the valuer (GBP801 million as at
February 2014 on an "actuarial" basis). This outcome is possible,
as is a voluntary refinancing by the sponsor. However, perhaps
the most likely outcome is a non-distressed debt exchange for the
class A notes following a debt restructuring. Nonetheless, the
class B notes face a real possibility of economic loss.
Rating Sensitivities
A change in the ratings is only likely to be made in the run-up
to, or shortly after, loan maturity in 2015, once possible exit
strategies to be negotiated by the sponsor, noteholders and swap
counterparties become more visible.
Fitch estimates 'Bsf' recoveries of from GBP400m to GBP450m net
of MtM termination fees.
Fitch will continue to monitor the performance of the
transaction.
HEARTS OF MIDLOTHIAN: Set to Officially Exit Administration Today
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Darren Johnstone and Iain Collin at The Scotsman report that the
Hearts of Midlothian Football Club are on course to officially
exit administration today, June 9, about 355 days after plunging
into a grave financial crisis that threatened the club's very
existence.
Barring any last-minute complications, BDO joint-administrator
Bryan Jackson is understood to be hopeful that the process will
be signed off by the Court of Session at the start of this week,
The Scotsman discloses.
The Tynecastle side went into administration on June 19 last year
with debts of GBP28.5 million and Jackson was forced to make
13-non playing staff and four players redundant, The Scotsman
relates.
Ahead of the first anniversary, it now looks certain that
Mr. Jackson will not have to apply for an administration
extension beyond June 19, The Scotsman says.
Ann Budge completed her GBP2.5 million takeover of Hearts on
May 9 and the self-made IT millionaire will run the business for
up to five years before handing it over to fans' group, the
Foundation of Hearts, The Scotsman relays.
According to The Scotsman, Hearts' transfer embargo will be
lifted should the club exit administration on Monday, and the
Edinburgh side will also avoid incurring another 15-point penalty
for next season's Championship campaign.
About Hearts of Midlothian
Hearts of Midlothian Football Club, more commonly known as
Hearts, is a Scottish professional football club based in Gorgie,
in the west of Edinburgh.
Hearts went into administration after the Scottish FA opened
disciplinary proceedings against the club. BDO was appointed
administrators on June 19.
HERCULES PLC: Fitch Affirms 'CCsf' Rating on Class E Notes
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded Hercules (Eclipse 2006-4) plc's CMBS
Class A notes due October 2018 and affirmed all other notes as
follows:
GBP625.7 million class A (XS0276410080) downgraded to 'BBB-sf'
from 'BBBsf'; Outlook Negative
GBP43.9 million class B (XS0276410833) affirmed at 'BBsf';
Outlook Negative
GBP25.0 million class C (XS0276412375) affirmed at 'Bsf';
Outlook Negative
GBP50.9 million class D (XS0276413183) affirmed at 'CCCsf';
Recovery Estimate (RE) 'RE70%'
GBP28.9 million class E (XS0276413340) affirmed at 'CCsf';
'RE0%'
Key Rating Drivers
The downgrade of the class A notes and Negative Outlook is driven
by weakening operating conditions for nursing homes in the UK,
exposing noteholders to further underperformance of the GBP73.2
million Ashbourne Portfolio Priority A (APPA) loan. The A loan is
a participation in the senior-most tranche of a complex GBP328
million package of debt secured by a portfolio of illiquid UK
nursing homes (another participation is held by Equinox Eclipse
2006-1, due 2018), The entire participation on behalf of multiple
issuers risks further debt extension. The affirmation of the
class B through E notes is driven by the steady performance of
the rest of the loans since Fitch's last rating action in July
2013.
Following Southern Cross's bankruptcy in 2011, two new nursing
home operators were installed to run the portfolio under a
management agreement, allowing the defaulted mortgage debt to be
restructured. This involved among other things, a short loan
extension, a bundling of unpaid amortization and interest on the
class A loan into new loans, and a crystallization of certain
swap liabilities as loans owed to the swap provider. In parallel
a disposal plan for non-performing properties has been
formulated, along with a cash sweep of EBITDA to service the
senior debt.
Although a structured capex program has been implemented to
enhance the value of the properties, Fitch has reservations about
how quickly any improvements will feed into potential liquidation
values, particularly for the non-performing homes. Stabilization
of the underlying operations is positive, although significant
risks remain regarding the borrower's ability to secure
refinancing at loan maturity, and the servicer's ability to
realize sufficient proceeds in time for note maturity. Fitch has
identified concerns with the UK care home sector by placing the
sector on negative outlook (see "2014 Outlook: UK Whole Business
Securitisations (WBS)", dated 10 December 2013).
Given the relatively small size of the APPA loan, it is the three
largest loans in the pool -- the River Court A-note (26%), the
Chapelfield loan (26%) and the Cannonbridge A-note (20%) -- which
anchor the ratings, particularly of the senior notes. All three
are secured by high quality collateral. Chapelfield has
manageable leverage and is likely to repay in full, whereas for
River Court and Cannonbridge their B-notes represent obstacles to
refinancing, but are also first in line to absorb any loan losses
should the recovery underway in the central London office market
be insufficient to allow for full repayment.
The Cannonbridge borrower has faced several years of financial
difficulty and continues to capitalise interest related to the B-
note in lieu of payment. Cannonbridge was restructured in 2010,
which included a considerable loan extension to allow for re-
letting and capex. While this has largely been successful in
stabilising income -- as lengthy rent-free periods have now
elapsed, the whole loan debt yield has improved to 6.6% -- the
rent roll creates a dependency on individual tenants (LIFFE and
Natixis, which together account for 62% of income, have breaks in
the next couple of years).
Were the Cannonbridge borrower to default at maturity in
January 2015, for senior noteholders there is arguably an
advantage; unlike loan redemption proceeds (which Fitch
understands would be applied pro rata) recovery proceeds would
flow sequentially and this would also switch the CMBS-wide
sequential trigger.
The three remaining loans (Booker, Endeavour and Welbeck) have
shown no material change in performance since Fitch's last rating
action, and contribute to the distressed rating of the lower
classes in particular.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
A major delay in the recovery of the APPA loan could result in
the class A notes being downgraded below investment grade. If
Chapelfield failed to repay at maturity, all the notes could face
a downgrade. Full repayment of the smaller loans could lead to a
positive revision of the Outlook or upgrade of individual note
classes affected.
Fitch estimates 'Bsf' recovery proceeds of GBP728.5m.
NEW WORLD: S&P Lowers CCR to 'CC' on Upcoming Exchange Offer
------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its long-term
corporate credit rating on U.K.-headquartered coal miner New
World Resources N.V. (NWR) to 'CC' from 'CCC'. The outlook is
negative.
In addition, S&P lowered its issue rating on NWR's senior secured
notes to 'CC' from 'CCC' and its issue ratings on NWR's senior
unsecured notes to 'C' from 'CC'.
The downgrades reflect NWR's recently announced exchange offer on
its outstanding EUR500 million senior secured notes due in 2018
and EUR275 million senior unsecured notes due in 2021. S&P
considers this exchange offer to be distressed, rather than
opportunistic, and caused by NWR's "weak" liquidity, as S&P's
criteria define the term.
As of March 31, 2014, NWR only had EUR159 million of cash, and no
available long-term credit facilities. Under S&P's base-case
scenario, it assumes that NWR will exhaust most of the cash by
the end of this year to support its ongoing operations, interest
expenses, and maintenance capital expenditure (capex).
Furthermore, NWR needs to maintain a minimum of EUR80 million in
cash as a condition of the interim covenants on its export credit
agency (ECA) facility. This leaves the company with very limited
liquidity sources and limited time to stabilize its capital
structure. In addition, S&P considers that NWR's liquidity is
constrained by weak coal market conditions. S&P understands that
the next coupon payments on the senior secured and unsecured
notes are due in July (about EUR11 million) and November (about
EUR20 million).
NWR's current proposal aims to reduce the amount of outstanding
notes to EUR450 million from EUR775 million through redemptions
with minimal haircuts of 5% on the secured notes and more than
75% on the unsecured notes, as well as the issue of new
instruments, including junior instruments and contingent value
rights. S&P views the proposal as constituting a distressed
exchange offer. In addition, NWR will receive an injection of
EUR185 million from the main shareholder, some of the
noteholders, and other minorities. NWR aims to finalize the
capital restructuring by the end of September 2014. The
restructuring will require the approval of the current
noteholders, consent from the outstanding ECA lenders, and
receipt of the equity injection.
"In our view, NWR's business profile remains "vulnerable" and its
financial risk profile "highly leveraged." These assessments
reflect NWR's weak position on the global cash cost curve,
coupled with our assumption that the coking coal market will
remain depressed in the coming two years (the hard coking coal
Australian reference spot price is currently about US$115 per
ton). We continue to assume that NWR's EBITDA will be in the
range of zero to negative EUR50 million in 2014 (in the first
quarter of 2014, NWR recorded EBITDA of about EUR10 million). In
our view, without a material rebound in coking coal and thermal
coal prices, NWR's credit metrics will remain unsustainable after
the capital restructuring," S&P said.
"We assess NWR's management and governance as "weak," based on
the company's proposed capital restructuring, which implies a
material haircut on the notes. Our assessment also reflects the
recent step-down of directors from the board; and NWR's decision
to continue operating the Paskov mine in the current price
environment, which suggests high risk tolerance," S&P noted.
The negative outlook reflects that S&P could lower its long-term
corporate credit rating on NWR to 'SD' (selective default) and
the issue rating on its outstanding notes to 'D' (default) in the
coming months if noteholders accept the exchange offer, or if the
company misses the next coupon payments in July or November.
Once the capital restructuring is finalized, S&P will revise the
ratings to reflect NWR's liquidity position and debt maturity
schedule.
RMAC 2005-NSP2: S&P Raises Ratings on 2 Note Classes to B+
----------------------------------------------------------
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services took various credit rating
actions in RMAC 2005-NS1 PLC and RMAC 2005-NSP2 PLC.
Specifically, S&P has:
-- Raised its rating on RMAC 2005-NS1's class M2 notes;
-- Affirmed its ratings on RMAC 2005-NS1's class A2a, A2c, M1,
and B1 notes;
-- Raised its ratings on RMAC 2005-NSP2's class M1a, M1c, M2a,
M2c, B1a, and B1c notes; and
-- Affirmed its ratings on RMAC 2005-NSP2's class A2a, A2b,
and A2c notes.
The rating actions follow S&P's review of these transactions.
S&P conducted its credit and cash flow analysis based on
information from the March 2014 investor reports, loan-level
data, and the application of S&P's relevant criteria.
RMAC 2005-NS1 and RMAC 2005-NSP2 are securitizations of U.K.
nonconforming residential mortgage loans, which Paratus AMC Ltd.
(formerly known as GMAC Residential Funding Co.) originated.
Except for a marginal increase in December 2013, total arrears in
these transactions have been declining. They are lower than
S&P's index for U.K. nonconforming residential-mortgage backed
securities (RMBS). In RMAC 2005-NS1, 90+ day delinquencies have
decreased to 13.25% from 20.45% in December 2011. This figure
has decreased to 12.58% in RMAC 2005-NSP2 from 21.02% in December
2011. This has remedied the breaches of the 90+ day
delinquencies triggers in both transactions (17.00% for RMAC
2005-NS1 and 15.00% for RMAC 2005-NSP2).
The transactions are subsequently paying principal pro rata.
However, in S&P's analysis, it considered the possibility of
these triggers being breached.
The transactions' improved seasoning and declining arrears have
led S&P to lower its weighted-average foreclosure frequency
(WAFF) calculations for both transactions since S&P's previous
reviews in 2012. The decline in arrears resulted in more loans
benefitting from a seasoning adjustment that S&P applies to up-
to-date loans, which are outstanding for more than five years.
In S&P's analysis, it considered scenarios in which interest
rates increase and arrears levels return to previous highs. S&P
has also slightly lowered its weighted-average loss severity
(WALS) assumptions for both transactions.
RMAC 2005-NS1
Rating WAFF WALS
level (%) (%)
AAA 38.59 27.80
AA 33.60 22.77
A 27.11 14.63
BBB 23.07 10.47
BB 18.91 7.77
B 16.47 5.56
RMAC 2005-NSP2
Rating WAFF WALS
level (%) (%)
AAA 37.40 27.84
AA 32.01 22.99
A 25.99 15.18
BBB 22.00 11.07
BB 18.05 8.36
B 15.91 6.14
Both transactions have deleveraged, increasing the available
credit enhancement for all classes of notes. The reserve funds
and liquidity facilities in both transactions have reached their
floor (minimum) level and will no longer amortize.
Due to S&P's lower WAFF and WALS assumptions and the increase in
credit enhancement, RMAC 2005-NS1's class M2 and RMAC 2005-NSP2's
class M1a, M1c, M2a, M2c, B1a and B1c notes pass S&P's cash flow
stresses at higher rating levels. Taking into consideration the
U.K.'s improving economic conditions and the rating levels at
which the notes pass S&P's cash flow stresses, it has raised its
ratings on these classes of notes.
S&P considers the available credit enhancement for RMAC 2005-
NS1's class B1 notes to be commensurate with our currently
assigned rating. S&P has therefore affirmed its 'B+ (sf)' rating
on this class of notes.
S&P's analysis of counterparty risk for both transactions remains
unchanged under its current counterparty criteria. Although the
class A2a and A2c notes in RMAC 2005-NS1, and the class A2a, A2b,
A2c, M1a and M1c in RMAC 2005-NS2 notes could achieve higher
ratings under S&P's cash flow analysis, its current counterparty
criteria continue to cap its ratings on these tranches at 'A
sf)'. S&P has therefore affirmed its 'A (sf)' ratings on these
classes of notes.
S&P's credit stability analysis indicates that the maximum
projected deterioration that it would expect at each rating level
for time horizons of one year and three years, under moderate
stress conditions, are in line with S&P's credit stability
criteria.
RATINGS LIST
Class Rating
To From
RMAC 2005-NS1 PLC
EUR526.4 Million, GBP250 Million, and $267.7 Million
Mortgage-Backed Floating-Rate Notes
Ratings Raised
M2 BBB (sf) BBB-(sf)
Ratings Affirmed
A2a A (sf)
A2c A (sf)
M1 A (sf)
B1 B+(sf)
RMAC 2005-NSP2 PLC
EUR466 Million, GBP353 Million, and $780 Million
Multi-Currency Mortgage-Backed Floating-Rate Notes
Ratings Raised
M1a A (sf) BBB+ (sf)
M1c A (sf) BBB+ (sf)
M2a BBB+ (sf) BB+ (sf)
M2c BBB+ (sf) BB+ (sf)
B1a B+ (sf) B- (sf)
B1c B+ (sf) B- (sf)
Ratings Affirmed
A2a A (sf)
A2b A (sf)
A2c A (sf)
SAGA LIMITED: Moody's Upgrades CFR to 'Ba2' Following IPO
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Saga Limited's corporate
family rating (CFR) to Ba2 from B1 and probability of default
rating (PDR) to Ba3-PD from B2-PD. Concurrently, Moody's upgraded
Saga Midco Limited's instrument ratings on the Term Loan A and
Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) to Ba2 from B1. The outlook on
the ratings is stable.
Ratings Rationale
The rating action follows the London primary IPO of Saga Plc (the
new holding company of the Saga Limited group of companies), with
27% of the share capital now in public ownership. Net IPO
proceeds of GBP512 million, along with cash from the balance
sheet, were used to reduce the group's indebtedness -- GBP125
million of the GBP825 million Term Loan A was prepaid while the
GBP425 million Term Loan B was repaid in full.
"Saga's Ba2 CFR reflects the company's significantly improved
credit metrics following its IPO, the proceeds of which were used
to repay part of its outstanding debt. Pro-forma for the IPO,
Saga's adjusted leverage ratio significantly improved to 3.3x
(based on 2013/2014 EBITDA including Moody's adjustments) from
5.6x", says Sebastien Cieniewski, Moody's lead analyst for Saga.
However, Moody's notes that the ratings are constrained by the
limited prospects for gross deleveraging over the rating horizon
because of the relatively mature nature of the markets where Saga
operates, as well as the intense price competition putting
pressure on premiums for the company's motor and home insurance
businesses.
Thanks to a reduced aggregate amount of debt and lower interest
margins following the completion of the IPO, Saga's pro-forma
adjusted EBITDA-to-Interest Expense ratio increased to 8.1x
(based on 2013/2014 EBITDA including Moody's adjustments) from
2.8x prior to the transaction. Moody's expects the company to
deliver Free Cash Flow (FCF) as a percentage of adjusted debt of
around mid-double digit over the period 2014/2015-2016/2017,
despite Saga's dividend policy expected at 40% to 50% of annual
net income with the first cash outflow projected for Q2
2015/2016.
Saga's liquidity position is good and supported by the company's
undrawn GBP150 million RCF while the pro-forma cash balance as of
March 31, 2014 is limited at approximately GBP30 million.
Saga's PDR of Ba3-PD, which is one notch below the CFR, reflects
Moody's assumption of a 65% family recovery rate as is customary
for capital structures including senior bank debt only with
maintenance covenants. The Term Loan A and RCF rank pari passu
but are junior to a maximum of GBP32.5 million of super senior
pension debt. The senior bank facilities benefit from only
limited guarantees in the absence of guarantees provided by the
regulated entities including Saga's underwriting and travel
businesses. The Ba2 rating of the Term Loan A and RCF, at the
same level as the CFR, results from the relatively small amount
of super senior pension liabilities and other non financial debt
liabilities at the operating companies ranking ahead. The senior
bank facilities remain subject to financial covenants (leverage
and interest cover) that have not changed following the IPO, and
hence have significant headroom.
Saga's CFR is weakly positioned within the Ba2 rating category.
The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the company
will continue to enjoy high renewal rates and stable margins in
its insurance business, which will allow it to generate free cash
flow well above 10% of adjusted gross debt. Upward rating
pressure could develop if Saga: (1) decreases its leverage to
below 3x on a sustainable basis; (2) maintains its FCF-to-debt at
around 15%; and (3) follows a conservative financial policy with
ample liquidity cushion. Downward rating pressure could develop
if: (1) the company's leverage increases sustainably above 3.5x;
(2) FCF/debt decreases to below 10%; (3) motor and home insurance
renewal rates weaken; and/or (4) the company adopts a more
aggressive financial policy.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was the Global
Business & Consumer Service Industry Rating Methodology published
in October 2010. Other methodologies used include Loss Given
Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in the
U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009.
Headquartered in Folkestone, UK, Saga provides a range of branded
products for the over-50s consumer segment in the UK. Saga's
products mainly span across financial services including motor
and home insurance, travel with a packaged and cruise holidays
offering, and healthcare which is specialised in private
domiciliary care services. In fiscal year ended January 2014,
Saga reported trading revenues and EBITDA of GBP1,258 million and
GBP234 million, respectively, and underlying revenues and EBITDA
(pro forma mainly for the Ruby ship retirement in January 2014)
of GBP1,209 million and GBP222 million, respectively. The company
is now listed on the London Stock Exchange. Approximately 72% of
the share capital is owned by Acromas BidCo Limited whose
ultimate shareholders are Charterhouse Capital partners (35.8%
ownership), CVC Capital Partners (19.9%), Permira Advisers
(19.9%), employees (20.2%) and other coinvestors (4.2%). The
remainder is owned by various institutional and retail investors.
===============
X X X X X X X X
===============
* EUROPE: EU Commission Okays New Cross-Border Insolvency Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------
Rebecca Christie at Bloomberg News reports that businesses that
go bust across borders in the European Union could seek
restructuring over immediate liquidation under proposals approved
by the bloc's justice ministers on Friday.
According to Bloomberg, the European Commission said in a
statement that the new bankruptcy rules would make it easier to
restructure a failing business and would provide rules for
determining legal jurisdiction. The proposals aim to give
creditors a better chance to recoup their investment than if a
troubled business were liquidated immediately, Bloomberg
discloses.
About 50,000 businesses a year are affected by cross-border
insolvency proceedings, or one in four bankruptcies, Bloomberg
says, citing European Commission data.
* BOND PRICING: For the Week June 2 to June 6, 2014
---------------------------------------------------
Issuer Coupon Maturity Currency Price
------ ------ -------- -------- -----
AUSTRIA
-------
IMMOFINANZ AG 4.25 3/8/2018 EUR 4.70
Alpine Holding Gmb 6.00 5/22/2017 EUR 0.25
Alpine Holding Gmb 5.25 7/1/2015 EUR 0.25
Alpine Holding Gmb 5.25 6/10/2016 EUR 0.25
A-TEC Industries A 8.75 10/27/2014 EUR 1.63
A-TEC Industries A 2.75 5/10/2014 EUR 2.00
A-TEC Industries A 5.75 11/2/2010 EUR 1.88
Hypo Alpe-Adria-Ba 0.79 11/29/2032 EUR 70.93
Hypo Alpe-Adria-Ba 0.68 12/18/2030 EUR 72.49
Investkredit Bank 4.63 4/12/2022 EUR 74.70
KA Finanz AG 4.90 6/23/2031 EUR 67.75
KA Finanz AG 4.44 12/20/2030 EUR 65.13
Oberoesterreichisc 0.63 11/6/2030 EUR 72.60
Oberoesterreichisc 0.52 4/25/2042 EUR 65.26
Oesterreichische V 1.06 7/29/2018 EUR 25.00
Oesterreichische V 5.27 2/8/2027 EUR 63.00
Raiffeisen Centrob 14.40 3/6/2014 EUR 73.77
UniCredit Bank Aus 0.75 8/20/2033 EUR 73.41
UniCredit Bank Aus 0.70 12/27/2031 EUR 71.81
UniCredit Bank Aus 0.57 1/25/2031 EUR 73.50
UniCredit Bank Aus 0.61 1/24/2031 EUR 73.64
UniCredit Bank Aus 0.72 1/22/2031 EUR 73.74
BELGIUM
-------
Econocom Group 4.00 6/1/2016 EUR 27.70
Ideal Standard Int 11.75 5/1/2018 EUR 72.33
Ideal Standard Int 11.75 5/1/2018 EUR 73.13
BULGARIA
--------
Petrol AD 8.38 1/26/2017 EUR 57.66
Aralco Finance SA 10.13 5/7/2020 USD 75.05
Aralco Finance SA 10.13 5/7/2020 USD 74.63
OGX Austria GmbH 8.50 6/1/2018 USD 12.03
OGX Austria GmbH 8.38 4/1/2022 USD 12.03
OGX Austria GmbH 8.50 6/1/2018 USD 11.88
OGX Austria GmbH 8.38 4/1/2022 USD 11.88
Clariden Leu Ltd/N 5.25 8/6/2014 CHF 65.59
Clariden Leu Ltd/N 4.50 8/13/2014 CHF 62.47
Credit Suisse/Nass 7.25 4/4/2014 USD 64.87
Clariden Leu Ltd/N 4.52 9/10/2014 CHF 65.99
CYPRUS
------
Cyprus Government 4.63 2/3/2020 EUR 73.86
Cyprus Government 6.00 7/1/2023 EUR 73.75
Cyprus Government 4.75 7/1/2020 EUR 73.13
Cyprus Government 5.25 7/1/2022 EUR 71.00
Cyprus Government 5.00 7/1/2021 EUR 71.75
CZECH REPUBLIC
--------------
Sazka AS 9.00 7/12/2021 EUR 10.13
DENMARK
-------
Kommunekredit 0.50 7/30/2027 TRY 26.38
Kommunekredit 0.50 9/19/2019 BRL 53.55
Kommunekredit 0.50 2/20/2020 BRL 51.34
Kommunekredit 0.50 5/11/2029 CAD 50.52
Kommunekredit 0.50 10/22/2019 BRL 53.10
Kommunekredit 0.50 12/14/2020 ZAR 60.44
FINLAND
-------
Municipality Finan 0.50 10/27/2016 BRL 73.96
Municipality Finan 0.50 11/30/2016 BRL 73.14
Municipality Finan 0.50 11/16/2017 TRY 71.26
Municipality Finan 0.50 6/19/2024 ZAR 37.00
Municipality Finan 0.50 2/17/2017 BRL 71.34
Municipality Finan 0.50 4/27/2018 ZAR 70.77
Municipality Finan 0.50 5/31/2022 ZAR 45.84
Municipality Finan 0.50 11/17/2016 BRL 73.90
Municipality Finan 0.50 11/10/2021 NZD 67.05
Municipality Finan 0.50 11/21/2018 ZAR 67.19
Municipality Finan 0.50 4/26/2022 ZAR 46.35
Municipality Finan 0.50 12/20/2018 ZAR 66.70
Municipality Finan 0.50 3/28/2018 BRL 62.02
Municipality Finan 0.50 12/14/2018 TRY 64.02
Municipality Finan 0.50 2/7/2018 BRL 68.42
Municipality Finan 0.50 3/16/2017 BRL 71.42
Municipality Finan 0.50 2/22/2019 IDR 65.22
Municipality Finan 0.50 11/21/2018 TRY 64.13
Municipality Finan 0.50 1/10/2018 BRL 64.01
Municipality Finan 0.50 6/22/2017 IDR 74.39
Municipality Finan 0.50 1/23/2018 BRL 64.50
Municipality Finan 0.25 6/28/2040 CAD 23.91
Municipality Finan 0.50 12/21/2021 NZD 66.64
Municipality Finan 0.50 11/25/2020 ZAR 54.11
Municipality Finan 0.50 3/17/2025 CAD 61.50
Talvivaara Mining 4.00 12/16/2015 EUR 17.99
FRANCE
------
Air France-KLM 4.97 4/1/2015 EUR 12.75
Air France-KLM 2.03 2/15/2023 EUR 10.59
Alcatel-Lucent/Fra 4.25 7/1/2018 EUR 3.12
Alcatel-Lucent/Fra 5.00 1/1/2015 EUR 3.36
Assystem 4.00 1/1/2017 EUR 24.27
AtoS 2.50 1/1/2016 EUR 61.09
AtoS 1.50 7/1/2016 EUR 60.87
BNP Paribas SA 0.50 1/31/2018 RUB 73.33
BNP Paribas SA 0.50 11/16/2032 MXN 39.68
BNP Paribas SA 0.50 5/6/2021 MXN 71.71
Caisse Centrale du 7.00 5/16/2014 EUR 53.03
Caisse Centrale du 7.00 5/18/2015 EUR 9.08
Caisse Centrale du 7.00 9/10/2015 EUR 15.35
Cap Gemini SA 3.50 1/1/2014 EUR 48.05
CGG SA 1.75 1/1/2016 EUR 28.39
CGG SA 1.25 1/1/2019 EUR 31.31
Club Mediterranee 6.11 11/1/2015 EUR 19.71
Credit Agricole Co 0.50 2/28/2018 RUB 73.06
Credit Agricole Co 0.50 3/6/2023 RUB 48.05
Dexia Credit Local 0.88 7/10/2017 EUR 74.75
Dexia Credit Local 4.38 2/12/2019 EUR 71.75
Etablissements Mau 7.13 7/31/2014 EUR 16.90
Etablissements Mau 7.13 7/31/2015 EUR 15.67
Faurecia 4.50 1/1/2015 EUR 24.46
Faurecia 3.25 1/1/2018 EUR 27.55
GFI Informatique S 5.25 1/1/2017 EUR 5.30
Ingenico 2.75 1/1/2017 EUR 57.77
Le Noble Age 4.88 1/3/2016 EUR 19.50
Nexans SA 2.50 1/1/2019 EUR 72.92
Nexans SA 4.00 1/1/2016 EUR 58.43
Novasep Holding SA 9.75 12/15/2016 USD 49.50
Novasep Holding SA 9.75 12/15/2016 USD 49.50
OL Groupe 7.00 12/28/2015 EUR 6.53
Orpea 1.75 1/1/2020 EUR 48.99
Orpea 3.88 1/1/2016 EUR 51.28
Peugeot SA 4.45 1/1/2016 EUR 26.65
Publicis Groupe SA 1.00 1/18/2018 EUR 60.32
SG Option Europe S 8.00 9/29/2015 USD 62.49
SG Option Europe S 7.00 5/5/2017 EUR 52.35
SG Option Europe S 7.00 9/22/2017 EUR 68.73
SG Option Europe S 8.00 12/18/2014 USD 40.49
SG Option Europe S 7.50 12/24/2014 EUR 38.00
SG Option Europe S 7.25 8/5/2014 EUR 62.59
Societe Air France 2.75 4/1/2020 EUR 21.03
Societe Generale S 0.50 6/12/2023 RUB 45.95
Societe Generale S 0.50 4/3/2023 RUB 46.79
Societe Generale S 0.50 11/29/2022 AUD 63.45
Societe Generale S 0.50 7/11/2022 USD 71.63
Societe Generale S 0.50 4/27/2022 USD 72.50
Societe Generale S 0.50 12/21/2022 AUD 63.21
Societe Generale S 0.50 4/30/2023 RUB 46.47
Societe Generale S 0.50 7/11/2022 AUD 64.99
Societe Generale S 0.50 12/6/2021 AUD 67.38
Societe Generale S 0.50 4/27/2022 AUD 65.81
Societe Generale S 0.50 9/7/2021 AUD 69.04
SOITEC 6.75 9/18/2018 EUR 2.50
SOITEC 6.25 9/9/2014 EUR 8.61
Tem SAS 4.25 1/1/2015 EUR 55.58
Zlomrex Internatio 8.50 2/1/2014 EUR 62.00
Zlomrex Internatio 8.50 2/1/2014 EUR 62.00
GEORGIA
-------
Bank J Safra Saras 13.60 2/17/2014 CHF 71.13
Bank Julius Baer & 6.20 4/15/2014 CHF 63.95
Bank Julius Baer & 9.00 12/13/2013 USD 67.65
Bank Julius Baer & 14.00 5/23/2014 USD 55.80
Bank Julius Baer & 8.50 12/13/2013 USD 56.05
Bank Julius Baer & 9.50 12/13/2013 USD 61.50
Bank Julius Baer & 12.60 12/13/2013 USD 52.65
Bank Julius Baer & 7.25 4/10/2014 USD 64.50
Bank Julius Baer & 9.00 1/29/2014 CHF 71.40
Bank Julius Baer & 6.10 4/17/2014 CHF 65.15
Bank Julius Baer & 6.20 4/17/2014 EUR 65.45
Bank Julius Baer & 5.00 12/23/2013 CHF 67.05
Bank Julius Baer & 10.20 11/29/2013 USD 52.45
Bank Julius Baer & 11.50 3/18/2014 USD 61.85
Bank Julius Baer & 6.80 4/11/2014 USD 70.15
Bank Julius Baer & 6.50 4/11/2014 USD 71.25
Bank Julius Baer & 9.00 4/11/2014 USD 71.05
Bank Julius Baer & 7.80 2/14/2014 USD 70.35
Bank Julius Baer & 7.50 2/14/2014 CHF 69.75
Bank Julius Baer & 10.00 4/4/2014 USD 62.75
Bank Julius Baer & 6.90 3/21/2014 USD 70.45
Banque Cantonale V 4.90 9/9/2014 CHF 73.73
EFG International 6.00 11/30/2017 EUR 39.45
EFG International 13.40 11/14/2013 CHF 58.64
EFG International 6.82 6/4/2014 CHF 70.01
EFG International 12.86 10/30/2017 EUR 35.40
EFG International 12.10 3/10/2014 USD 50.04
EFG International 4.50 2/20/2014 USD 58.50
EFG International 5.85 10/14/2014 CHF 72.75
EFG International 10.00 12/17/2013 USD 66.27
Leonteq Securities 11.90 1/15/2014 EUR 50.01
Leonteq Securities 17.00 11/21/2013 CAD 40.23
Leonteq Securities 9.25 11/5/2013 USD 36.80
Leonteq Securities 12.65 12/10/2013 EUR 50.06
Leonteq Securities 7.80 8/26/2014 CHF 55.40
Leonteq Securities 15.00 2/13/2014 CHF 55.94
Leonteq Securities 12.00 11/15/2013 CHF 54.70
Leonteq Securities 17.05 2/14/2014 CHF 42.69
Leonteq Securities 10.03 10/25/2013 CHF 48.39
Leonteq Securities 5.06 5/26/2014 CHF 74.49
Leonteq Securities 18.00 12/6/2013 CHF 58.34
Leonteq Securities 8.40 11/27/2013 CHF 69.11
Leonteq Securities 8.80 12/6/2013 EUR 66.34
Leonteq Securities 20.00 12/12/2013 CHF 59.36
Leonteq Securities 12.80 12/12/2013 CHF 56.01
Leonteq Securities 8.00 12/12/2013 CHF 67.47
Leonteq Securities 8.10 12/13/2013 CHF 56.63
Leonteq Securities 9.20 11/15/2013 CHF 72.96
Leonteq Securities 7.21 11/14/2013 CHF 72.00
Leonteq Securities 10.00 11/21/2013 CHF 48.23
Leonteq Securities 13.60 12/6/2013 CHF 53.15
Leonteq Securities 8.75 6/6/2014 GBP 71.26
Leonteq Securities 8.00 12/6/2013 USD 65.15
Leonteq Securities 12.89 12/10/2013 GBP 52.10
Leonteq Securities 10.20 11/14/2013 CHF 56.32
Leonteq Securities 8.01 11/15/2013 CHF 44.99
Leonteq Securities 21.75 5/22/2014 USD 45.78
Leonteq Securities 20.00 5/27/2014 CHF 71.16
Leonteq Securities 12.00 2/24/2014 CHF 69.73
Leonteq Securities 9.46 6/3/2014 AUD 61.68
Leonteq Securities 24.40 2/25/2014 USD 44.15
Leonteq Securities 22.75 2/4/2014 USD 68.91
Leonteq Securities 15.60 2/6/2014 CHF 55.74
Leonteq Securities 12.25 1/30/2014 CHF 49.87
Leonteq Securities 20.52 3/25/2014 USD 50.23
Leonteq Securities 10.00 1/17/2014 CHF 54.64
Leonteq Securities 21.50 3/21/2014 USD 57.05
Leonteq Securities 8.90 3/28/2014 EUR 63.16
Leonteq Securities 14.25 2/13/2015 USD 62.34
Leonteq Securities 11.50 2/11/2014 USD 70.57
Leonteq Securities 20.50 2/13/2014 CHF 65.24
Leonteq Securities 5.80 8/20/2014 USD 70.34
Leonteq Securities 13.25 2/14/2014 USD 60.87
Leonteq Securities 10.00 7/29/2014 USD 58.84
Leonteq Securities 29.61 10/26/2017 EUR 39.70
Leonteq Securities 9.00 10/31/2013 CHF 43.77
Leonteq Securities 12.00 3/5/2014 CHF 60.81
Leonteq Securities 8.50 12/24/2013 USD 54.18
Leonteq Securities 14.06 12/18/2013 USD 52.76
Leonteq Securities 5.76 12/20/2013 GBP 67.92
Leonteq Securities 10.00 1/23/2014 CHF 54.82
Leonteq Securities 8.00 6/19/2014 CHF 73.01
Leonteq Securities 6.80 12/19/2014 USD 71.84
Leonteq Securities 14.05 12/27/2013 CHF 55.88
Leonteq Securities 6.00 5/20/2014 CHF 66.65
Leonteq Securities 10.00 11/27/2013 CHF 74.15
Leonteq Securities 20.00 11/27/2013 CHF 57.98
Leonteq Securities 11.95 11/29/2013 EUR 54.01
Leonteq Securities 8.35 1/3/2014 AUD 70.38
Leonteq Securities 9.20 12/27/2013 CHF 70.21
Leonteq Securities 9.60 1/8/2014 USD 47.95
Leonteq Securities 8.40 1/15/2014 CHF 74.30
Leonteq Securities 14.00 9/22/2014 CHF 66.90
Leonteq Securities 10.80 1/15/2014 CHF 54.68
Leonteq Securities 5.50 1/25/2016 EUR 64.28
Leonteq Securities 12.00 12/6/2013 GBP 52.45
Leonteq Securities 20.14 4/9/2014 USD 55.40
Leonteq Securities 5.50 8/19/2014 USD 72.76
Leonteq Securities 20.07 2/19/2014 USD 41.82
Leonteq Securities 10.00 2/6/2014 USD 57.48
Leonteq Securities 23.90 1/24/2014 USD 43.75
Leonteq Securities 10.00 11/5/2013 USD 71.34
Leonteq Securities 25.70 1/24/2014 USD 50.45
Mare Baltic PCC Lt 2.00 11/1/2015 DKK 0.00
Zurcher Kantonalba 12.35 11/13/2013 CHF 56.78
Zurcher Kantonalba 8.22 11/15/2013 CHF 56.56
Zurcher Kantonalba 6.05 12/19/2013 EUR 65.62
Zurcher Kantonalba 9.00 12/31/2013 CHF 58.57
Zurcher Kantonalba 10.40 12/5/2013 EUR 60.48
Zurcher Kantonalba 10.65 12/6/2013 CHF 57.99
GERMANY
-------
ATU Auto-Teile-Ung 7.47 10/1/2014 EUR 18.67
BDT Media Automati 8.13 10/9/2017 EUR 65.75
BNP Paribas Emissi 6.00 11/21/2013 EUR 72.21
BNP Paribas Emissi 5.00 11/21/2013 EUR 58.40
BNP Paribas Emissi 7.00 12/30/2013 EUR 60.64
BNP Paribas Emissi 5.50 11/21/2013 EUR 60.09
BNP Paribas Emissi 5.00 11/21/2013 EUR 60.05
BNP Paribas Emissi 6.50 12/30/2013 EUR 59.53
BNP Paribas Emissi 5.50 11/21/2013 EUR 68.77
BNP Paribas Emissi 4.50 11/21/2013 EUR 72.24
BNP Paribas Emissi 6.00 11/21/2013 EUR 74.37
Bremer Landesbank 0.69 3/21/2031 EUR 67.09
Bremer Landesbank 0.72 4/5/2041 EUR 54.49
Centrosolar Group 7.00 2/15/2016 EUR 13.75
Commerzbank AG 8.40 12/30/2013 EUR 2.56
Commerzbank AG 5.05 12/24/2013 EUR 67.54
DekaBank Deutsche 2.21 9/22/2021 EUR 13.92
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 10/31/2013 EUR 56.20
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 11/29/2013 EUR 65.00
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 10/31/2013 EUR 64.80
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 10/31/2013 EUR 61.70
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 11/29/2013 EUR 62.00
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 11/29/2013 EUR 56.60
Deutsche Bank AG 8.20 6/24/2014 EUR 61.80
Deutsche Bank AG 6.20 6/24/2014 EUR 66.00
Deutsche Bank AG 7.20 6/24/2014 EUR 62.90
Deutsche Bank AG 6.20 3/25/2014 EUR 66.40
Deutsche Bank AG 8.20 3/25/2014 EUR 61.50
Deutsche Bank AG 7.20 3/25/2014 EUR 62.90
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 8/20/2014 EUR 69.00
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 8/20/2014 EUR 65.10
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 8/20/2014 EUR 61.50
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 8/20/2014 EUR 56.80
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 8/20/2014 EUR 69.80
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 8/20/2014 EUR 65.90
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 8/20/2014 EUR 62.30
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 8/20/2014 EUR 57.70
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 8/20/2014 EUR 70.70
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 8/20/2014 EUR 66.70
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 8/20/2014 EUR 63.20
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 8/20/2014 EUR 58.50
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 6/25/2014 EUR 66.70
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 6/25/2014 EUR 59.24
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 6/24/2014 EUR 55.20
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 6/24/2014 EUR 55.90
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 6/24/2014 EUR 56.60
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 6/24/2014 EUR 52.50
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 6/24/2014 EUR 53.20
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 6/24/2014 EUR 53.90
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 6/24/2014 EUR 54.50
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 6/24/2014 EUR 55.20
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 6/24/2014 EUR 51.20
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 6/24/2014 EUR 51.90
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 6/24/2014 EUR 52.60
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 6/24/2014 EUR 53.30
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 6/24/2014 EUR 53.90
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 6/24/2014 EUR 60.00
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 6/24/2014 EUR 60.70
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 6/24/2014 EUR 61.30
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 6/24/2014 EUR 62.00
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 6/24/2014 EUR 62.70
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 6/24/2014 EUR 58.30
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 6/24/2014 EUR 59.00
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 6/24/2014 EUR 59.70
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 6/24/2014 EUR 60.40
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 6/24/2014 EUR 61.00
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 6/24/2014 EUR 57.40
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 6/24/2014 EUR 58.10
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 6/24/2014 EUR 58.80
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 6/24/2014 EUR 59.50
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 6/24/2014 EUR 55.90
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 6/24/2014 EUR 56.60
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 6/24/2014 EUR 57.30
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 6/24/2014 EUR 58.00
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 6/24/2014 EUR 53.80
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 6/24/2014 EUR 54.50
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 4/24/2014 EUR 68.90
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 4/24/2014 EUR 65.30
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 4/24/2014 EUR 62.10
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 7/22/2014 EUR 72.10
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 3/25/2014 EUR 62.10
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 3/25/2014 EUR 58.60
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 3/25/2014 EUR 59.10
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 3/25/2014 EUR 59.50
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 3/25/2014 EUR 60.40
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 3/25/2014 EUR 58.30
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 3/25/2014 EUR 55.90
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 3/25/2014 EUR 56.30
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 3/25/2014 EUR 56.80
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 3/25/2014 EUR 57.20
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 3/25/2014 EUR 54.00
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 3/25/2014 EUR 55.30
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 3/25/2014 EUR 55.70
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 3/25/2014 EUR 53.90
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 3/25/2014 EUR 51.70
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 3/25/2014 EUR 53.00
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 9/23/2014 EUR 74.80
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 9/23/2014 EUR 73.60
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 12/20/2013 EUR 54.70
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 12/20/2013 EUR 63.80
Deutsche Bank AG 11.00 12/20/2013 EUR 64.10
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 3/25/2014 EUR 61.20
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 3/25/2014 EUR 57.40
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 3/25/2014 EUR 54.40
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 3/25/2014 EUR 54.90
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 3/25/2014 EUR 52.60
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 3/25/2014 EUR 53.00
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 3/25/2014 EUR 53.50
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 3/25/2014 EUR 51.30
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 3/25/2014 EUR 52.60
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 12/20/2013 EUR 63.60
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 12/20/2013 EUR 59.70
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 12/20/2013 EUR 60.00
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 12/20/2013 EUR 55.00
Deutsche Bank AG 11.00 12/20/2013 EUR 60.20
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 3/25/2014 EUR 66.40
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 3/25/2014 EUR 61.40
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 3/25/2014 EUR 62.80
Deutsche Bank AG 11.00 12/20/2013 EUR 55.20
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 10/31/2013 EUR 62.70
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 10/31/2013 EUR 53.80
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 11/29/2013 EUR 63.00
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 10/31/2013 EUR 72.80
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 2/28/2014 EUR 60.60
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 12/20/2013 EUR 63.10
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 12/20/2013 EUR 56.10
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 11/29/2013 EUR 55.80
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 11/29/2013 EUR 67.30
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 11/29/2013 EUR 59.20
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 11/29/2013 EUR 54.30
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 2/28/2014 EUR 64.00
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 2/28/2014 EUR 56.00
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 12/20/2013 EUR 59.40
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 11/29/2013 EUR 59.20
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 10/31/2013 EUR 58.90
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 10/31/2013 EUR 62.70
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 11/29/2013 EUR 63.20
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 11/29/2013 EUR 59.40
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 12/20/2013 EUR 59.60
Deutsche Bank AG 10.00 12/20/2013 EUR 53.60
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 12/20/2013 EUR 56.30
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 12/20/2013 EUR 56.40
Deutsche Bank AG 9.00 12/20/2013 EUR 54.90
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 10/31/2013 EUR 67.10
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 10/31/2013 EUR 58.80
Deutsche Bank AG 9.00 11/29/2013 EUR 73.50
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 11/29/2013 EUR 62.90
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 12/20/2013 EUR 59.80
Deutsche Bank AG 9.00 12/20/2013 EUR 58.10
Deutsche Bank AG 10.00 12/20/2013 EUR 58.30
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 12/20/2013 EUR 55.90
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 12/20/2013 EUR 56.00
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 12/20/2013 EUR 57.60
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 12/20/2013 EUR 57.80
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 12/20/2013 EUR 57.90
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 12/20/2013 EUR 56.20
Deutsche Bank AG 10.00 12/20/2013 EUR 56.60
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 12/20/2013 EUR 59.50
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 12/20/2013 EUR 56.50
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 3/26/2014 EUR 66.95
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 12/20/2013 EUR 57.90
Deutsche Bank AG 9.00 12/20/2013 EUR 59.90
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 3/26/2014 EUR 70.59
Deutsche Bank AG 9.00 12/20/2013 EUR 56.40
Deutsche Bank AG 12.00 12/20/2013 EUR 51.20
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 12/20/2013 EUR 59.40
Deutsche Bank AG 10.00 12/20/2013 EUR 55.00
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 6/24/2014 EUR 71.70
Deutsche Bank AG 4.50 3/25/2014 EUR 75.00
Deutsche Bank AG 5.00 3/25/2014 EUR 72.70
Deutsche Bank AG 7.00 1/31/2014 EUR 62.00
Deutsche Bank AG 8.00 1/31/2014 EUR 60.40
Deutsche Bank AG 5.50 3/25/2014 EUR 60.30
Deutsche Bank AG 6.50 3/25/2014 EUR 60.80
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 3/25/2014 EUR 61.60
Deutsche Bank AG 8.50 3/25/2014 EUR 59.90
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 3/25/2014 EUR 57.90
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 3/25/2014 EUR 58.70
Deutsche Bank AG 9.50 3/25/2014 EUR 54.30
Deutsche Bank AG 7.50 3/25/2014 EUR 52.20
Deutsche Bank AG 6.00 1/31/2014 EUR 65.80
Deutsche Bank AG 4.50 6/24/2014 EUR 73.70
Dresdner Bank AG 0.89 11/19/2029 EUR 51.13
Dresdner Bank AG 5.45 2/22/2029 EUR 65.92
Dresdner Bank AG 1.08 12/31/2021 EUR 72.13
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 12.00 10/25/2013 EUR 73.65
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 2.35 3/24/2023 EUR 70.50
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.25 10/25/2013 EUR 70.93
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 8.50 10/25/2013 EUR 72.67
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.00 10/25/2013 EUR 50.42
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.75 12/31/2013 EUR 55.46
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.00 12/31/2013 EUR 72.18
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.75 11/8/2013 EUR 54.90
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.25 10/25/2013 EUR 73.66
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.00 12/31/2013 EUR 51.95
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.00 12/13/2013 EUR 62.43
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.75 11/22/2013 EUR 74.95
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.50 11/22/2013 EUR 49.33
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.25 11/8/2013 EUR 56.39
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.00 12/31/2013 EUR 64.79
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 9.40 12/31/2013 EUR 58.13
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 9.50 10/25/2013 EUR 48.70
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 15.75 11/22/2013 EUR 4.94
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 10.75 12/31/2013 EUR 56.51
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 9.25 3/28/2014 EUR 58.18
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.75 6/27/2014 EUR 60.94
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 9.75 6/27/2014 EUR 58.40
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 8.50 9/26/2014 EUR 59.94
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.00 4/7/2014 EUR 62.91
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.50 6/13/2014 EUR 63.50
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.00 10/25/2013 EUR 58.00
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.00 12/20/2013 EUR 68.68
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 9.50 1/10/2014 EUR 65.98
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 12.25 1/10/2014 EUR 68.31
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 10.75 7/11/2014 EUR 74.40
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.30 7/11/2014 EUR 69.50
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.50 12/13/2013 EUR 55.94
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 3.50 12/31/2013 EUR 64.92
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.50 6/13/2014 EUR 66.92
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 2.50 12/13/2013 EUR 68.49
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 8.00 3/28/2014 EUR 53.91
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.40 7/11/2014 EUR 68.63
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 4.75 12/13/2013 EUR 59.73
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.50 1/15/2014 EUR 74.79
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.00 11/11/2013 EUR 49.46
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.00 12/13/2013 EUR 59.41
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.25 3/7/2014 EUR 58.45
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.50 2/14/2014 EUR 56.46
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 10.00 12/31/2013 EUR 63.87
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.25 6/27/2014 EUR 69.05
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 8.75 9/26/2014 EUR 66.80
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 9.25 3/28/2014 EUR 65.56
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 9.75 6/27/2014 EUR 65.38
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 4.00 12/13/2013 EUR 60.82
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.25 10/25/2013 EUR 54.26
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.00 12/13/2013 EUR 72.70
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.50 6/27/2014 EUR 64.75
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.50 6/27/2014 EUR 63.09
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 9.75 6/13/2014 EUR 64.24
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 4.50 12/31/2013 EUR 62.28
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.50 3/14/2014 EUR 52.87
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.00 1/17/2014 EUR 58.65
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 4.00 3/28/2014 EUR 57.78
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 4.00 12/20/2013 EUR 68.55
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 5.75 11/22/2013 EUR 58.79
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 9.75 11/22/2013 EUR 53.48
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 7.50 1/10/2014 EUR 70.79
DZ Bank AG Deutsch 6.00 3/28/2014 EUR 60.96
EDOB Abwicklungs A 7.50 3/29/2049 EUR 3.25
EDOB Abwicklungs A 7.50 3/29/2049 EUR 3.25
Estavis AG 7.75 6/25/2017 EUR 2.29
getgoods.de AG 7.75 10/2/2017 EUR 68.50
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 10/23/2013 EUR 60.54
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 10/23/2013 EUR 47.86
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 12/27/2013 EUR 68.38
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 12/27/2013 EUR 44.22
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/27/2013 EUR 72.58
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 12/27/2013 EUR 67.54
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 11/20/2013 EUR 70.02
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 12/27/2013 EUR 43.09
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 11/20/2013 EUR 61.82
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/27/2013 EUR 47.51
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 12/27/2013 EUR 48.06
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 10/23/2013 EUR 44.71
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 11/20/2013 EUR 72.30
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 10/23/2013 EUR 68.51
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 3/26/2014 EUR 73.08
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 3/26/2014 EUR 57.54
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 10/23/2013 EUR 69.75
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 3/26/2014 EUR 74.11
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 11/20/2013 EUR 70.69
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 10/23/2013 EUR 68.67
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 11/20/2013 EUR 66.17
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 3/26/2014 EUR 69.23
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 10/23/2013 EUR 72.71
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 10/23/2013 EUR 71.90
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 11/20/2013 EUR 72.42
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 11/20/2013 EUR 57.14
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 10/23/2013 EUR 47.84
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 3/26/2014 EUR 56.14
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 10/23/2013 EUR 52.12
Goldman Sachs & Co 18.00 10/23/2013 EUR 43.70
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 11/20/2013 EUR 74.24
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 11/20/2013 EUR 72.22
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 12/27/2013 EUR 55.96
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 3/26/2014 EUR 54.46
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 10/23/2013 EUR 49.40
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 11/20/2013 EUR 46.58
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 3/26/2014 EUR 50.67
Goldman Sachs & Co 17.00 10/23/2013 EUR 72.12
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 3/26/2014 EUR 63.79
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/24/2014 EUR 72.15
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 12/24/2014 EUR 61.30
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 12/27/2013 EUR 71.38
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 12/27/2013 EUR 67.72
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 12/27/2013 EUR 50.02
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 12/27/2013 EUR 46.96
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 12/27/2013 EUR 67.65
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 3/26/2014 EUR 69.01
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 12/27/2013 EUR 59.73
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 12/27/2013 EUR 55.64
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 12/27/2013 EUR 54.56
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 3/26/2014 EUR 53.04
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 12/27/2013 EUR 67.36
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 12/27/2013 EUR 60.95
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 12/27/2013 EUR 61.49
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 12/27/2013 EUR 55.92
Goldman Sachs & Co 4.00 3/26/2014 EUR 63.10
Goldman Sachs & Co 5.00 3/26/2014 EUR 67.72
Goldman Sachs & Co 5.00 3/26/2014 EUR 65.56
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 3/26/2014 EUR 58.88
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 3/26/2014 EUR 56.78
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 3/26/2014 EUR 60.15
Goldman Sachs & Co 5.00 6/25/2014 EUR 61.58
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 6/25/2014 EUR 61.84
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 6/25/2014 EUR 59.71
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 3/26/2014 EUR 54.92
Goldman Sachs & Co 19.00 3/26/2014 EUR 56.61
Goldman Sachs & Co 4.00 6/25/2014 EUR 66.52
Goldman Sachs & Co 4.00 6/25/2014 EUR 62.76
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 9/24/2014 EUR 61.79
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 9/24/2014 EUR 65.32
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 9/24/2014 EUR 63.62
Goldman Sachs & Co 19.00 6/25/2014 EUR 57.83
Goldman Sachs & Co 5.00 9/24/2014 EUR 67.95
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 9/24/2014 EUR 58.17
Goldman Sachs & Co 17.00 9/24/2014 EUR 59.59
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 10/23/2013 EUR 49.40
Goldman Sachs & Co 5.00 10/23/2013 EUR 62.52
Goldman Sachs & Co 5.00 12/27/2013 EUR 57.12
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 3/26/2014 EUR 63.94
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 8/20/2014 EUR 58.46
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 12/27/2013 EUR 69.58
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 12/27/2013 EUR 49.99
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 12/27/2013 EUR 59.96
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/27/2013 EUR 58.55
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 12/27/2013 EUR 64.12
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 12/27/2013 EUR 71.02
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 12/27/2013 EUR 47.15
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 12/27/2013 EUR 49.26
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.50 12/27/2013 EUR 43.13
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 12/27/2013 EUR 37.67
Goldman Sachs & Co 3.00 12/24/2014 EUR 68.05
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 3/26/2014 EUR 54.84
Goldman Sachs & Co 17.00 2/26/2014 EUR 74.27
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 12/27/2013 EUR 59.43
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 3/26/2014 EUR 59.71
Goldman Sachs & Co 17.00 3/26/2014 EUR 55.75
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 1/22/2014 EUR 61.77
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 3/26/2014 EUR 61.74
Goldman Sachs & Co 17.00 1/22/2014 EUR 72.86
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 12/27/2013 EUR 52.26
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 2/26/2014 EUR 52.23
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 1/22/2014 EUR 58.90
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 1/22/2014 EUR 56.41
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 1/22/2014 EUR 55.68
Goldman Sachs & Co 17.00 12/27/2013 EUR 70.65
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 12/24/2014 EUR 58.55
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/27/2013 EUR 50.47
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 12/27/2013 EUR 72.82
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/27/2013 EUR 55.54
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 12/27/2013 EUR 73.11
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 12/27/2013 EUR 73.16
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 12/27/2013 EUR 70.65
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 11/20/2013 EUR 66.64
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 10/23/2013 EUR 61.94
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 12/27/2013 EUR 63.22
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 3/26/2014 EUR 66.42
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 3/26/2014 EUR 63.94
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 11/20/2013 EUR 50.98
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 10/23/2013 EUR 49.39
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 3/26/2014 EUR 49.64
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 11/20/2013 EUR 45.17
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 11/20/2013 EUR 42.06
Goldman Sachs & Co 17.00 11/20/2013 EUR 41.31
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 10/23/2013 EUR 70.25
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 3/26/2014 EUR 73.65
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 11/20/2013 EUR 67.23
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 3/26/2014 EUR 69.70
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 3/26/2014 EUR 54.89
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 12/27/2013 EUR 56.40
Goldman Sachs & Co 18.00 12/27/2013 EUR 52.01
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 3/26/2014 EUR 54.90
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 2/26/2014 EUR 55.73
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 12/27/2013 EUR 59.19
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 12/27/2013 EUR 48.72
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 11/20/2013 EUR 73.14
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 3/26/2014 EUR 68.12
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 3/26/2014 EUR 51.20
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 10/23/2013 EUR 74.87
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/27/2013 EUR 66.31
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 10/23/2013 EUR 71.91
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 11/20/2013 EUR 52.23
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 11/20/2013 EUR 48.85
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 11/20/2013 EUR 45.57
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 10/23/2013 EUR 74.03
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 12/27/2013 EUR 56.22
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 11/20/2013 EUR 49.88
Goldman Sachs & Co 18.00 10/23/2013 EUR 42.71
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 3/26/2014 EUR 47.30
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 10/23/2013 EUR 70.26
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 10/23/2013 EUR 70.26
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 11/20/2013 EUR 70.55
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/27/2013 EUR 54.06
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 12/27/2013 EUR 65.08
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/27/2013 EUR 68.50
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 12/27/2013 EUR 61.48
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 12/27/2013 EUR 56.30
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 12/27/2013 EUR 57.30
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 12/27/2013 EUR 68.63
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 12/27/2013 EUR 48.78
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/27/2013 EUR 48.65
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 11/20/2013 EUR 64.83
Goldman Sachs & Co 14.00 11/20/2013 EUR 51.46
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 11/20/2013 EUR 50.28
Goldman Sachs & Co 15.00 3/26/2014 EUR 52.47
Goldman Sachs & Co 16.00 12/27/2013 EUR 48.06
Goldman Sachs & Co 12.00 10/23/2013 EUR 49.43
Goldman Sachs & Co 17.00 10/23/2013 EUR 50.76
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 3/26/2014 EUR 53.69
Goldman Sachs & Co 11.00 12/27/2013 EUR 47.15
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 12/27/2013 EUR 71.84
Goldman Sachs & Co 10.00 12/27/2013 EUR 55.02
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 12/27/2013 EUR 59.61
Goldman Sachs & Co 4.00 12/27/2013 EUR 60.59
Goldman Sachs & Co 4.00 12/27/2013 EUR 69.44
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 3/26/2014 EUR 57.47
Goldman Sachs & Co 3.00 3/26/2014 EUR 64.72
Goldman Sachs & Co 8.00 9/24/2014 EUR 59.95
Goldman Sachs & Co 13.00 2/26/2014 EUR 48.40
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 10/23/2013 EUR 52.85
Goldman Sachs & Co 6.00 10/23/2013 EUR 64.68
Goldman Sachs & Co 7.00 12/27/2013 EUR 63.13
Goldman Sachs & Co 4.00 3/26/2014 EUR 74.62
Goldman Sachs & Co 9.00 6/25/2014 EUR 60.40
Gunther Zamek Prod 7.75 5/15/2017 EUR 55.50
Hamburgische Lande 0.60 1/22/2041 EUR 68.03
Hamburgische Lande 0.61 10/30/2040 EUR 68.07
Hamburgische Lande 0.61 11/28/2030 EUR 74.77
Hamburgische Lande 0.60 10/25/2030 EUR 75.00
Hamburgische Lande 0.56 10/30/2030 EUR 74.24
Hamburgische Lande 0.64 7/18/2031 EUR 74.20
Hamburgische Lande 0.69 11/8/2030 EUR 74.82
Hamburgische Lande 0.59 2/5/2031 EUR 73.86
Hamburgische Lande 0.58 10/25/2030 EUR 74.61
Hamburgische Lande 0.59 12/1/2030 EUR 73.55
Hanwha Q-CELLS Gmb 6.75 10/21/2015 EUR 1.32
HSBC Trinkaus & Bu 10.50 12/30/2013 EUR 73.80
HSBC Trinkaus & Bu 12.50 12/30/2013 EUR 70.21
HSBC Trinkaus & Bu 11.00 12/30/2013 EUR 73.68
HSH Nordbank AG 1.03 2/14/2017 EUR 68.24
HSH Nordbank AG 1.07 2/14/2017 EUR 68.16
IKB Deutsche Indus 1.12 9/13/2016 EUR 74.66
IKB Deutsche Indus 0.97 1/23/2017 EUR 71.62
KFW 0.25 10/6/2036 CAD 33.42
Landesbank Berlin 4.80 11/7/2014 EUR 58.28
Landesbank Berlin 7.25 6/27/2014 EUR 58.30
Landesbank Berlin 4.00 12/30/2013 EUR 63.19
Landesbank Berlin 5.00 6/27/2014 EUR 64.20
Landesbank Berlin 4.00 12/30/2014 EUR 68.24
Landesbank Berlin 7.00 12/30/2014 EUR 64.80
Landesbank Berlin 4.75 12/30/2014 EUR 65.47
Landesbank Berlin 8.50 3/28/2014 EUR 62.32
Landesbank Berlin 4.75 3/28/2014 EUR 70.71
Landesbank Berlin 8.50 3/28/2014 EUR 65.88
Landesbank Berlin 11.00 12/30/2013 EUR 7.94
Landesbank Berlin 5.50 6/27/2014 EUR 62.69
Landesbank Berlin 4.00 3/28/2014 EUR 61.97
Landesbank Berlin 5.00 8/8/2014 EUR 58.13
Landesbank Berlin 5.00 3/28/2014 EUR 60.58
Landesbank Berlin 6.00 3/28/2014 EUR 65.28
Landesbank Berlin 3.00 3/28/2014 EUR 72.82
Landesbank Berlin 4.50 3/28/2014 EUR 68.83
Landesbank Berlin 5.00 12/30/2013 EUR 59.52
Landesbank Berlin 4.00 3/28/2014 EUR 65.95
Landesbank Berlin 8.00 3/28/2014 EUR 60.17
Landesbank Berlin 7.00 6/27/2014 EUR 58.72
Landesbank Berlin 11.00 6/27/2014 EUR 14.56
Landesbank Berlin 4.00 6/27/2014 EUR 65.46
Landesbank Berlin 5.50 12/23/2013 EUR 60.90
Landesbank Berlin 4.00 6/27/2014 EUR 68.01
Landesbank Berlin 7.00 6/27/2014 EUR 62.46
Landesbank Hessen- 0.85 7/18/2031 EUR 63.96
Landesbank Hessen- 4.00 6/20/2014 EUR 59.10
Landeskreditbank B 0.25 10/13/2037 CAD 29.38
Landeskreditbank B 0.50 5/10/2027 CAD 57.81
Landwirtschaftlich 0.50 4/19/2017 TRY 74.97
LBBW 0.62 10/4/2030 EUR 71.11
LBBW 4.00 11/22/2013 EUR 74.51
LBBW 4.00 3/28/2014 EUR 60.31
LBBW 5.00 3/28/2014 EUR 57.49
LBBW 3.00 11/22/2013 EUR 66.79
LBBW 5.00 11/22/2013 EUR 62.53
LBBW 4.00 11/22/2013 EUR 65.79
LBBW 4.00 7/25/2014 EUR 64.82
LBBW 3.00 2/28/2014 EUR 67.30
LBBW 5.00 2/28/2014 EUR 58.88
LBBW 6.00 2/28/2014 EUR 56.10
LBBW 5.00 11/22/2013 EUR 58.10
LBBW 3.00 11/22/2013 EUR 63.63
LBBW 4.00 11/22/2013 EUR 60.83
LBBW 3.00 6/27/2014 EUR 64.58
LBBW 4.00 6/27/2014 EUR 61.78
LBBW 5.00 6/27/2014 EUR 59.62
LBBW 3.00 8/22/2014 EUR 67.39
LBBW 4.00 8/22/2014 EUR 65.35
LBBW 5.00 8/22/2014 EUR 63.72
LBBW 3.00 2/28/2014 EUR 64.90
LBBW 5.00 2/28/2014 EUR 61.60
LBBW 5.00 9/26/2014 EUR 61.16
LBBW 4.00 10/25/2013 EUR 58.36
LBBW 4.00 3/28/2014 EUR 61.06
LBBW 3.00 3/28/2014 EUR 64.74
LBBW 4.00 1/24/2014 EUR 67.54
LBBW 6.00 1/24/2014 EUR 60.58
LBBW 7.00 1/24/2014 EUR 58.00
LBBW 7.00 11/22/2013 EUR 69.09
LBBW 4.00 6/27/2014 EUR 63.66
LBBW 6.00 6/27/2014 EUR 59.62
LBBW 6.00 7/25/2014 EUR 61.69
LBBW 4.00 3/28/2014 EUR 60.09
LBBW 5.10 1/15/2014 EUR 68.01
LBBW 5.00 6/27/2014 EUR 58.31
LBBW 4.00 6/27/2014 EUR 59.42
LBBW 3.00 6/27/2014 EUR 61.09
LBBW 3.00 9/26/2014 EUR 64.39
LBBW 4.00 9/26/2014 EUR 62.54
LBBW 7.00 9/26/2014 EUR 59.20
LBBW 5.00 11/22/2013 EUR 63.58
LBBW 6.00 11/22/2013 EUR 64.98
LBBW 8.00 11/22/2013 EUR 58.71
Norddeutsche Lande 0.69 10/21/2030 EUR 74.42
Praktiker AG 5.88 2/10/2016 EUR 1.50
Qimonda Finance LL 6.75 3/22/2013 USD 3.44
SiC Processing Gmb 7.13 3/1/2016 EUR 5.50
Solarwatt GmbH 7.00 11/1/2015 EUR 14.75
Solarworld AG 6.13 1/21/2017 EUR 37.25
Solarworld AG 6.38 7/13/2016 EUR 33.00
Solon SE 1.38 12/6/2012 EUR 0.63
Sparkasse KoelnBon 0.68 5/7/2031 EUR 71.54
Sparkasse KoelnBon 0.74 9/29/2034 EUR 68.26
TAG Immobilien AG 6.50 12/10/2015 EUR 9.45
TUI AG 2.75 3/24/2016 EUR 64.09
UniCredit Bank AG 0.92 11/19/2029 EUR 65.48
Vontobel Financial 5.45 12/31/2013 EUR 59.48
Vontobel Financial 5.47 3/17/2014 EUR 35.50
Vontobel Financial 4.30 12/31/2013 EUR 63.20
Vontobel Financial 7.70 12/31/2013 EUR 54.94
Vontobel Financial 5.30 6/27/2014 EUR 60.94
Vontobel Financial 4.25 12/31/2013 EUR 63.14
Vontobel Financial 5.30 12/31/2013 EUR 59.38
Vontobel Financial 9.85 12/31/2013 EUR 73.66
Vontobel Financial 4.20 12/31/2013 EUR 63.14
Vontobel Financial 5.35 12/31/2013 EUR 59.50
Vontobel Financial 7.40 12/31/2013 EUR 54.84
Vontobel Financial 9.85 12/31/2013 EUR 51.06
Vontobel Financial 6.10 12/31/2013 EUR 59.66
Vontobel Financial 5.50 12/31/2013 EUR 59.56
Vontobel Financial 6.85 12/31/2013 EUR 54.78
Vontobel Financial 7.15 12/31/2013 EUR 54.82
Vontobel Financial 9.10 12/31/2013 EUR 50.96
Vontobel Financial 5.10 4/14/2014 EUR 30.60
Vontobel Financial 17.15 12/31/2013 EUR 52.48
Vontobel Financial 4.25 12/31/2013 EUR 63.20
Vontobel Financial 8.65 12/31/2013 EUR 56.66
Vontobel Financial 6.30 12/31/2013 EUR 59.72
Vontobel Financial 8.70 12/31/2013 EUR 73.44
Vontobel Financial 7.85 12/31/2013 EUR 50.72
Vontobel Financial 5.50 12/31/2013 EUR 54.52
Vontobel Financial 5.10 6/27/2014 EUR 60.50
Vontobel Financial 8.00 12/31/2013 EUR 55.02
Vontobel Financial 7.35 6/27/2014 EUR 57.28
Vontobel Financial 4.60 3/28/2014 EUR 60.20
Vontobel Financial 4.75 12/31/2013 EUR 59.42
Vontobel Financial 7.20 3/28/2014 EUR 56.40
Vontobel Financial 7.45 12/31/2013 EUR 59.94
Vontobel Financial 10.20 12/31/2013 EUR 56.98
Vontobel Financial 4.80 12/31/2013 EUR 56.58
Vontobel Financial 5.50 12/31/2013 EUR 56.38
Vontobel Financial 8.85 12/31/2013 EUR 54.96
Vontobel Financial 8.35 12/31/2013 EUR 56.92
Vontobel Financial 7.70 12/31/2013 EUR 54.74
Vontobel Financial 7.40 12/31/2013 EUR 59.92
Vontobel Financial 5.40 6/27/2014 EUR 57.68
Vontobel Financial 5.05 3/28/2014 EUR 57.46
Vontobel Financial 7.60 3/28/2014 EUR 58.24
Vontobel Financial 5.65 3/28/2014 EUR 57.40
Vontobel Financial 4.35 12/31/2013 EUR 63.26
Vontobel Financial 8.65 12/31/2013 EUR 60.16
Vontobel Financial 7.75 12/31/2013 EUR 54.72
Vontobel Financial 8.15 12/31/2013 EUR 56.38
Vontobel Financial 15.75 12/31/2013 EUR 52.14
Vontobel Financial 10.45 12/31/2013 EUR 55.40
Vontobel Financial 6.35 12/31/2013 EUR 54.68
Vontobel Financial 8.00 12/31/2013 EUR 54.98
Vontobel Financial 5.25 12/31/2013 EUR 59.50
Vontobel Financial 6.45 12/31/2013 EUR 74.82
Vontobel Financial 5.00 1/24/2014 EUR 61.50
Vontobel Financial 7.39 11/25/2013 EUR 62.60
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 2.50 12/23/2013 EUR 68.43
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 3.00 1/30/2014 EUR 69.85
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 4.00 1/30/2014 EUR 65.48
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 5.00 1/30/2014 EUR 63.64
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 6.00 12/18/2013 EUR 52.92
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 4.00 12/18/2013 EUR 59.07
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 5.00 12/18/2013 EUR 55.81
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 7.50 12/18/2013 EUR 50.43
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 4.00 3/27/2014 EUR 66.20
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 3.00 6/25/2014 EUR 61.31
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 5.50 6/25/2014 EUR 56.15
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 4.00 6/25/2014 EUR 58.30
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 7.00 6/25/2014 EUR 54.32
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 6.00 1/30/2014 EUR 61.94
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 6.00 3/11/2014 EUR 54.62
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 4.00 9/30/2014 EUR 74.98
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 5.00 9/30/2014 EUR 73.89
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 6.00 9/30/2014 EUR 73.00
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 3.00 3/27/2014 EUR 68.09
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 5.00 3/27/2014 EUR 64.45
WGZ-Bank AG Westde 6.00 3/27/2014 EUR 62.91
Windreich GmbH 6.50 7/15/2016 EUR 11.13
Windreich GmbH 6.50 3/1/2015 EUR 9.88
Windreich GmbH 6.75 3/1/2015 EUR 11.13
Windreich GmbH 6.25 3/1/2015 EUR 11.13
GREECE
------
Yioula Glassworks 9.00 12/1/2015 EUR 74.00
Yioula Glassworks 9.00 12/1/2015 EUR 74.00
ICELAND
-------
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.13 5/19/2016 USD 0.13
Kaupthing Bank Hf 5.75 10/4/2011 USD 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 5.75 10/4/2011 USD 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.63 2/28/2015 USD 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 6.50 2/3/2045 EUR 0.13
Kaupthing Bank Hf 3.00 2/12/2010 CHF 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 4.70 2/15/2010 CAD 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 6.13 10/4/2016 USD 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 4.65 2/19/2013 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 6.13 10/4/2016 USD 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.50 2/1/2045 USD 0.13
Kaupthing Bank Hf 1.99 7/5/2012 JPY 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 9.75 9/10/2015 USD 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.13 5/19/2016 USD 0.13
Kaupthing Bank Hf 5.50 2/2/2009 USD 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 1.80 10/20/2009 JPY 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 5.80 9/7/2012 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.63 2/28/2015 USD 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 0.80 2/15/2011 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.50 12/5/2014 ISK 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 3.75 2/15/2024 ISK 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.00 4/28/2012 ISK 0.13
Kaupthing Bank Hf 5.25 7/18/2017 BGN 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 1.65 7/5/2010 JPY 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.90 2/1/2016 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 4.95 5/6/2009 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 8.00 6/22/2011 ISK 0.13
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.70 10/2/2011 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 4.50 1/17/2011 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 0.69 5/21/2011 JPY 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.00 7/24/2009 ISK 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 0.20 7/12/2009 JPY 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 5.00 11/8/2013 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.50 4/2/2011 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.50 10/2/2010 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.00 1/3/2011 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 4.53 4/24/2012 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 4.47 10/27/2010 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 0.95 10/20/2010 JPY 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 5.00 1/4/2027 SKK 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 4.90 5/29/2017 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 6.50 10/8/2010 ISK 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 5.40 3/22/2014 ISK 0.13
Kaupthing Bank Hf 7.90 4/28/2016 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 1.75 6/7/2016 EUR 22.88
Kaupthing Bank Hf 6.40 12/15/2015 EUR 22.88
LBI HF 6.10 8/25/2011 USD 8.00
LBI HF 3.20 5/10/2010 SKK 8.00
LBI HF 2.25 2/14/2011 CHF 8.00
LBI HF 6.10 8/25/2011 USD 8.00
LBI HF 3.00 12/7/2010 CHF 8.00
LBI HF 4.40 1/18/2010 CAD 8.00
LBI HF 4.38 10/20/2008 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 4.75 5/31/2013 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 4.53 4/24/2012 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 7.25 4/2/2011 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 8.65 5/1/2011 ISK 8.00
LBI HF 4.08 3/16/2015 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 6.75 8/18/2015 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 4.40 11/3/2009 CZK 8.00
LBI HF 6.00 6/6/2017 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 5.44 9/3/2018 EUR 0.13
LBI HF 4.28 11/19/2010 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 2.14 2/3/2020 JPY 8.00
LBI HF 4.32 1/31/2010 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 4.40 11/30/2035 EUR 0.13
LBI HF 5.25 6/5/2023 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 5.08 3/1/2013 ISK 8.00
LBI HF 7.00 4/2/2010 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 3.00 10/22/2015 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 1.68 12/22/2014 JPY 8.00
LBI HF 4.00 9/23/2015 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 3.45 12/18/2033 JPY 0.13
LBI HF 2.22 10/15/2019 JPY 8.00
LBI HF 4.34 3/1/2011 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 3.34 5/11/2012 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 7.75 2/22/2016 USD 8.00
LBI HF 2.75 3/16/2011 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 3.36 8/17/2012 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 7.20 4/27/2026 EUR 0.13
LBI HF 6.75 2/18/2015 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 3.11 11/10/2008 EUR 8.00
LBI HF 4.34 12/22/2025 EUR 8.00
IRELAND
-------
Corsicanto Ltd 3.50 1/15/2032 USD 74.94
Depfa ACS Bank 4.90 8/24/2035 CAD 69.73
Depfa ACS Bank 0.50 3/3/2025 CAD 46.53
Kalvebod PLC 2.00 5/1/2106 DKK 40.00
ITALY
-------
Banca delle Marche 1.18 6/1/2017 EUR 42.39
A2A SpA 3.20 8/10/2036 EUR 62.44
Banca delle Marche 5.50 9/16/2030 EUR 69.25
Banca di Cividale 0.34 10/2/2036 EUR 57.63
Banca Monte dei Pa 1.23 1/15/2018 EUR 74.60
Cassa Depositi e P 0.29 10/31/2029 EUR 61.70
Cirio Finanziaria 8.00 12/21/2005 EUR 0.63
City of Lecco Ital 0.46 6/30/2026 EUR 67.27
Comune di Andrano 3.92 12/31/2035 EUR 71.20
Comune di Fiumicin 0.49 12/31/2026 EUR 66.65
Comune di Grontard 4.10 12/31/2035 EUR 73.36
Comune di Marcheno 4.23 12/31/2036 EUR 74.59
Comune di Marscian 4.03 12/31/2035 EUR 72.47
Comune di Mercato 3.97 12/31/2035 EUR 71.83
Comune di Piadena 4.05 12/31/2035 EUR 72.74
Comune di San Ferd 0.53 12/27/2026 EUR 67.26
Comune di Santa Ma 0.60 5/31/2026 EUR 69.00
Comune di Seminara 0.72 10/31/2026 EUR 69.14
Comune di Verona 0.43 12/1/2026 EUR 64.53
Enel SpA 0.96 10/20/2032 EUR 63.62
Intesa Sanpaolo Sp 1.06 3/20/2023 EUR 74.70
Italy Government I 1.85 9/15/2057 EUR 65.06
Italy Government I 2.00 9/15/2062 EUR 67.03
Italy Government I 2.20 9/15/2058 EUR 72.77
Italy Government I 2.87 5/19/2036 JPY 69.43
Province of Bresci 0.73 12/22/2036 EUR 57.22
Province of Bresci 0.72 6/30/2036 EUR 57.58
Province of Chieti 0.65 12/29/2023 EUR 74.35
Province of Milan 0.59 12/22/2033 EUR 63.54
Province of Rovigo 0.59 12/28/2035 EUR 58.80
Province of Teramo 0.44 12/30/2030 EUR 60.80
Province of Teramo 0.47 12/30/2025 EUR 68.61
Province of Trevis 0.47 12/31/2034 EUR 58.04
Province of Trevis 0.57 12/31/2034 EUR 59.52
Province of Trevis 0.34 12/31/2034 EUR 56.82
Region of Abruzzo 0.68 11/7/2036 EUR 63.64
Region of Abruzzo 0.52 11/7/2031 EUR 61.27
Region of Abruzzo 4.45 3/1/2037 EUR 70.52
Region of Aosta Va 0.45 5/28/2021 EUR 73.65
Region of Molise I 0.72 12/15/2033 EUR 64.40
Region of Piemont 0.45 11/27/2036 EUR 55.47
Region of Puglia I 0.74 2/6/2023 EUR 69.69
Seat Pagine Gialle 10.50 1/31/2017 EUR 23.00
Seat Pagine Gialle 10.50 1/31/2017 EUR 22.13
Seat Pagine Gialle 10.50 1/31/2017 EUR 22.63
Seat Pagine Gialle 10.50 1/31/2017 EUR 22.75
Seat Pagine Gialle 10.50 1/31/2017 EUR 22.13
Seat Pagine Gialle 10.50 1/31/2017 EUR 22.63
LUXEMBOURG
----------
3W Power SA 9.25 12/1/2015 EUR 55.75
ArcelorMittal 7.25 4/1/2014 EUR 20.83
Bank of New York M 4.48 12/30/2099 EUR 18.04
Bank of New York M 4.73 12/15/2050 EUR 52.00
Cerruti Finance SA 6.50 7/26/2004 EUR 3.00
Cirio Finance Luxe 7.50 11/3/2002 EUR 1.25
Cirio Holding Luxe 6.25 2/16/2004 EUR 0.13
Codere Finance Lux 8.25 6/15/2015 EUR 52.02
Codere Finance Lux 9.25 2/15/2019 USD 50.50
Codere Finance Lux 9.25 2/15/2019 USD 50.98
Codere Finance Lux 8.25 6/15/2015 EUR 50.75
Codere Finance Lux 8.25 6/15/2015 EUR 51.75
Codere Finance Lux 8.25 6/15/2015 EUR 50.75
Del Monte Finance 6.63 5/24/2006 EUR 13.63
ECM Real Estate In 5.00 10/9/2011 EUR 10.38
ECM Real Estate In 5.00 10/9/2011 EUR 10.38
Erste Europaeische 0.27 2/1/2037 USD 55.57
European Media Cap 10.00 2/1/2015 USD 75.00
European Media Cap 10.00 2/1/2015 USD 75.00
Finmek Internation 7.00 12/3/2004 EUR 0.13
Hellas Telecommuni 8.50 10/15/2013 EUR 0.13
Hellas Telecommuni 8.50 10/15/2013 EUR 0.13
Hypothekenbank Fra 0.25 12/20/2029 USD 67.37
International Indu 9.00 7/6/2011 EUR 1.00
International Indu 11.00 2/19/2013 USD 0.88
IT Holding Finance 9.88 11/15/2012 EUR 0.13
IT Holding Finance 9.88 11/15/2012 EUR 0.13
La Veggia Finance 7.13 11/14/2004 EUR 0.25
Teksid Aluminum Lu 11.38 7/15/2011 EUR 0.75
NETHERLANDS
-----------
Astana Finance BV 7.88 6/8/2010 EUR 4.00
Astana Finance BV 9.00 11/16/2011 USD 3.50
Astana Finance BV 14.50 7/2/2013 USD 3.75
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 5/10/2017 TRY 73.62
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 7/12/2022 ZAR 52.90
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 7/12/2017 TRY 72.46
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 6/7/2022 ZAR 53.32
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 6/12/2017 TRY 73.13
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 8/9/2017 TRY 72.30
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 6/22/2021 ZAR 57.64
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 3/29/2021 NZD 70.64
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 8/15/2022 ZAR 52.50
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 8/9/2022 MXN 64.98
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 3/3/2021 NZD 64.80
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 2/24/2025 CAD 65.15
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 5/12/2021 ZAR 58.17
Bank Nederlandse G 0.50 9/20/2022 ZAR 52.08
BLT Finance BV 7.50 5/15/2014 USD 9.01
BLT Finance BV 12.00 2/10/2015 USD 10.25
BLT Finance BV 7.50 5/15/2014 USD 9.63
Bulgaria Steel Fin 12.00 5/4/2013 EUR 0.38
Bulgaria Steel Fin 12.00 5/4/2013 EUR 0.38
Cirio Del Monte NV 7.75 3/14/2005 EUR 3.38
Cooperatieve Centr 0.50 11/26/2021 ZAR 48.95
Cooperatieve Centr 0.50 10/30/2043 MXN 23.60
Cooperatieve Centr 0.50 8/21/2028 MXN 46.15
Cooperatieve Centr 0.50 7/30/2043 MXN 23.80
Cooperatieve Centr 0.50 1/31/2033 MXN 36.68
Cooperatieve Centr 0.50 10/29/2027 MXN 48.35
Cooperatieve Centr 0.50 11/30/2027 MXN 48.11
Cooperatieve Centr 0.50 12/29/2027 MXN 47.89
Cooperatieve Centr 9.20 3/13/2014 USD 60.77
Cooperatieve Centr 8.60 3/13/2014 CHF 60.50
Cooperatieve Centr 8.15 3/5/2014 CHF 58.60
Cooperatieve Centr 9.20 3/13/2014 USD 60.43
JP Morgan Structur 6.00 2/7/2014 USD 69.19
JP Morgan Structur 5.00 12/3/2013 CHF 64.32
JP Morgan Structur 6.00 2/25/2014 EUR 73.83
JP Morgan Structur 12.30 11/29/2013 USD 48.32
KPNQwest NV 8.88 2/1/2008 EUR 0.25
KPNQwest NV 7.13 6/1/2009 EUR 0.25
KPNQwest NV 10.00 3/15/2012 EUR 0.25
KPNQwest NV 8.13 6/1/2009 USD 0.38
KPNQwest NV 7.13 6/1/2009 EUR 0.25
KPNQwest NV 8.88 2/1/2008 EUR 0.25
KPNQwest NV 8.88 2/1/2008 EUR 0.25
KPNQwest NV 7.13 6/1/2009 EUR 0.25
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.25 10/5/2035 EUR 9.75
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 11/2/2035 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.25 3/16/2035 EUR 14.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 2/15/2035 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.00 5/17/2035 EUR 10.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.88 3/14/2013 CHF 2.13
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 9/22/2014 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 2/16/2015 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.10 5/8/2017 HKD 2.50
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.00 11/26/2013 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 3/14/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 2/27/2014 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.50 7/5/2016 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 2/16/2017 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 14.90 9/15/2008 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.50 5/2/2017 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 3/18/2015 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.03 1/31/2015 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 10/24/2012 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.00 5/9/2012 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.25 5/26/2026 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.25 12/3/2015 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.70 3/18/2015 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.00 6/6/2017 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 11.00 12/20/2017 AUD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 12/2/2012 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 10/30/2012 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.46 2/19/2012 JPY 2.50
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.00 6/23/2009 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.75 2/7/2010 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 2/28/2010 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 7/20/2012 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.00 6/17/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.00 10/22/2010 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 7/27/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.05 9/16/2008 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.44 11/22/2008 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 8/16/2017 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 12.22 11/21/2017 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.00 9/13/2010 JPY 2.50
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.10 6/10/2014 SGD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.00 4/20/2009 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.86 9/21/2011 SGD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.50 12/20/2027 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 5/12/2011 CHF 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 8/1/2025 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.55 3/12/2015 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.05 4/8/2015 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.70 3/23/2016 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.25 9/5/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 23.30 9/16/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.00 10/17/2014 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.88 1/28/2011 HKD 2.50
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.25 11/21/2009 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.10 2/19/2010 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.00 1/3/2012 BRL 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 13.50 6/2/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 8/7/2013 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.00 3/21/2018 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 13.50 11/28/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.00 6/11/2038 JPY 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.50 9/19/2017 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.50 4/23/2014 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.50 6/22/2010 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.00 2/16/2016 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 3/10/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 4/13/2011 CHF 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.50 3/7/2015 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.60 1/31/2013 AUD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 16.00 11/9/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 9.75 6/22/2018 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.12 4/30/2027 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.50 5/2/2017 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 2/28/2032 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.60 7/6/2016 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.10 6/22/2046 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.65 8/24/2011 AUD 2.50
Lehman Brothers Tr 16.00 12/26/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.50 12/15/2011 GBP 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.68 12/12/2045 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.06 12/29/2008 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.05 9/16/2008 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.00 6/28/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.70 3/4/2015 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.69 2/19/2017 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.59 11/22/2009 MXN 2.50
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.28 11/6/2010 JPY 2.50
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 12/20/2017 AUD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 12/20/2017 AUD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.60 2/9/2009 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 6/2/2020 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 12/20/2017 AUD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.38 2/4/2014 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.30 12/21/2018 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.00 2/15/2010 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 16.20 5/14/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.60 10/11/2017 ILS 2.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 15.00 3/30/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.50 10/24/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.00 8/3/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.60 7/31/2013 GBP 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 12/20/2017 AUD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 7/2/2020 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.25 7/8/2014 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.50 5/16/2015 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 14.90 11/16/2010 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.72 12/29/2008 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 12/20/2017 AUD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 15.00 6/4/2009 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 18.25 10/2/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.50 10/31/2011 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.80 3/19/2018 JPY 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.00 11/16/2009 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.25 10/6/2008 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 11/22/2012 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 9.25 6/20/2012 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.60 5/21/2013 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 13.00 2/16/2009 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.01 9/20/2011 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 2/19/2023 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.60 4/22/2014 MXN 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.00 12/3/2012 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.50 8/23/2012 GBP 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.37 7/15/2013 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.87 10/8/2013 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.75 6/15/2009 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 10/24/2008 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.38 9/20/2008 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.00 8/15/2017 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.50 9/29/2017 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.00 8/8/2017 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.25 2/3/2016 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 13.43 1/8/2009 ILS 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 16.00 10/8/2008 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 3/13/2009 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.25 4/1/2023 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.63 7/22/2011 HKD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 11.00 7/4/2011 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.80 3/31/2018 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 5/2/2022 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.25 5/15/2010 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.28 7/31/2013 GBP 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.35 8/8/2016 SGD 2.50
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.50 7/6/2009 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.50 8/9/2010 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.00 7/11/2010 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.82 12/18/2036 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.20 12/3/2008 HKD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.00 6/3/2010 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 12.40 6/12/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 11.00 7/4/2011 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 12.00 7/4/2011 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.50 7/8/2013 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 9.30 12/21/2010 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.00 12/31/2010 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.50 2/8/2012 CHF 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 12/20/2017 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 12/20/2017 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 12/20/2017 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 12/20/2017 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 11.00 2/16/2009 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.00 2/16/2009 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.00 3/19/2012 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 9.50 4/1/2018 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.15 3/21/2013 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.25 11/30/2012 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.00 2/26/2010 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.50 6/20/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.50 2/14/2010 AUD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.00 10/23/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.00 10/22/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.45 2/20/2010 AUD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.00 5/22/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.60 8/1/2013 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.00 5/22/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.60 3/4/2010 NZD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.63 3/2/2012 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.75 2/21/2016 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.80 12/27/2009 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 11.00 12/20/2017 AUD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.75 3/29/2012 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 12/6/2011 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 11.00 12/20/2017 AUD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 1/4/2011 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 11.75 3/1/2010 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.82 10/20/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.00 8/13/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.80 11/16/2012 HKD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 10/12/2010 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.00 10/23/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 9/20/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.40 9/21/2009 HKD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.30 4/28/2014 JPY 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.50 6/15/2017 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 12/30/2017 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.10 5/20/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.00 5/17/2010 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 13.00 7/25/2012 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.00 8/2/2037 JPY 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.50 10/12/2010 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.10 8/23/2010 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.60 11/9/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 2/14/2012 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.00 2/15/2012 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 5/12/2017 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.60 2/22/2012 EUR 1.13
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.20 3/19/2018 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.95 11/4/2013 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 11.00 12/19/2011 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.00 3/27/2009 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 10/24/2008 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.00 4/14/2009 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.75 1/30/2009 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.25 7/21/2014 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.95 10/25/2036 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 11.00 6/29/2009 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.50 6/15/2009 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.50 10/25/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.75 4/5/2012 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 4/24/2017 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.39 5/4/2017 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.35 10/13/2016 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.80 12/30/2016 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 5/23/2018 CZK 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 5/30/2010 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 5/17/2010 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.48 5/12/2009 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.25 5/12/2009 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.30 6/27/2013 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.50 10/24/2011 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.25 10/19/2012 CHF 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.68 3/5/2015 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 9.00 5/15/2022 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.50 7/31/2013 GBP 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.32 7/31/2013 GBP 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.50 9/13/2009 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.50 7/24/2026 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.50 8/2/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 2/16/2009 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.25 3/13/2021 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 3/17/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.70 3/23/2016 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 12/6/2016 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 9/1/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.70 6/6/2009 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.50 3/6/2013 CHF 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 4/24/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 9.00 6/13/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 9.00 3/17/2009 GBP 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.00 11/28/2008 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.85 4/24/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.00 5/22/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.50 7/24/2014 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.50 12/30/2010 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.75 1/3/2012 AUD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.10 6/4/2010 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.50 8/15/2012 CHF 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 13.15 10/30/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 0.50 8/1/2020 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 14.10 11/12/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 8/11/2010 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 12.00 7/13/2037 JPY 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 7/28/2010 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 7/28/2010 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.50 8/1/2035 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.90 7/28/2020 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.15 8/25/2020 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.50 5/30/2010 AUD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 11.00 5/9/2020 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.30 6/4/2012 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 6/5/2011 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.30 6/6/2013 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 6/21/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.00 6/21/2011 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 10.00 1/4/2010 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 17.00 6/2/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 16.80 8/21/2009 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.22 3/1/2024 EUR 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.60 5/23/2012 AUD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.45 5/23/2013 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 16.00 10/28/2008 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.00 2/15/2018 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 9.00 5/6/2011 CHF 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.75 10/28/2009 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 5.50 11/30/2012 CZK 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.50 11/9/2011 CHF 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 4.00 11/24/2016 EUR 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.00 10/30/2012 USD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 3.00 9/12/2036 JPY 2.50
Lehman Brothers Tr 13.00 12/14/2012 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 2.40 6/20/2011 JPY 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 1.60 6/21/2010 JPY 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 8.05 12/20/2010 HKD 1.38
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.25 6/20/2010 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 7.00 9/20/2011 USD 6.00
Lehman Brothers Tr 6.70 4/21/2011 USD 6.00
Magyar Telecom BV 9.50 12/15/2016 EUR 45.04
Magyar Telecom BV 9.50 12/15/2016 EUR 44.63
Morgan Stanley BV 9.00 4/16/2015 EUR 71.90
Nederlandse Waters 0.50 3/11/2025 CAD 65.79
New World Resource 7.88 5/1/2018 EUR 68.24
New World Resource 7.88 1/15/2021 EUR 36.78
New World Resource 7.88 1/15/2021 EUR 36.25
New World Resource 7.88 5/1/2018 EUR 68.47
NIBC Bank NV 25.98 5/7/2029 EUR 50.62
Nutritek Internati 8.75 12/11/2008 USD 2.00
Q-Cells Internatio 1.38 4/30/2012 EUR 32.45
Q-Cells Internatio 5.75 5/26/2014 EUR 32.09
Sairgroup Finance 4.38 6/8/2006 EUR 10.50
Sairgroup Finance 6.63 10/6/2010 EUR 12.13
Sidetur Finance BV 10.00 4/20/2016 USD 55.25
Sidetur Finance BV 10.00 4/20/2016 USD 55.00
SNS Bank NV 6.25 10/26/2020 EUR 2.13
SNS Bank NV 6.63 5/14/2018 EUR 4.13
WPE International 10.38 9/30/2020 USD 59.90
WPE International 10.38 9/30/2020 USD 59.38
NORWAY
------
Eksportfinans ASA 0.25 7/14/2033 CAD 8.50
Eksportfinans ASA 0.50 5/9/2030 CAD 14.25
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 3/7/2017 BRL 69.77
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 5/10/2017 BRL 68.32
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 8/29/2017 BRL 66.85
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 5/25/2018 ZAR 70.89
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 9/26/2017 BRL 65.80
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 3/28/2017 BRL 68.91
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 6/28/2017 BRL 67.67
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 9/20/2018 BRL 64.71
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 3/2/2018 BRL 62.66
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 6/1/2017 BRL 68.22
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 8/15/2018 BRL 67.16
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 3/29/2017 BRL 70.51
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 8/16/2016 BRL 73.83
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 5/27/2022 ZAR 47.60
Kommunalbanken AS 0.50 7/28/2016 BRL 74.11
Norske Skogindustr 7.00 6/26/2017 EUR 60.59
Norske Skogindustr 11.75 6/15/2016 EUR 74.02
Norske Skogindustr 6.13 10/15/2015 USD 72.75
Norske Skogindustr 6.13 10/15/2015 USD 69.53
Norske Skogindustr 7.13 10/15/2033 USD 51.63
Norske Skogindustr 11.75 6/15/2016 EUR 73.50
Norske Skogindustr 7.13 10/15/2033 USD 50.08
Petromena ASA 9.75 5/24/2014 NOK 6.75
Petromena ASA 10.85 11/19/2010 USD 6.75
PORTUGAL
--------
AdP - Aguas de Por 0.33 1/23/2023 EUR 63.88
Banco Espirito San 3.50 1/2/2043 EUR 50.13
Caixa Geral de Dep 5.98 3/3/2028 EUR 57.00
CP - Comboios de P 5.70 2/5/2030 EUR 60.31
Empresa de Desenvo 0.33 11/21/2018 EUR 66.63
Metropolitano de L 4.80 12/7/2027 EUR 73.38
Metropolitano de L 4.06 12/4/2026 EUR 71.93
Parpublica - Parti 4.20 11/16/2026 EUR 68.25
Portugal Obrigacoe 4.10 4/15/2037 EUR 72.12
Rede Ferroviaria N 4.25 12/13/2021 EUR 70.38
Rede Ferroviaria N 4.05 11/16/2026 EUR 71.78
ROMANIA
-------
City of Iasi Roman 4.45 11/15/2028 RON 71.23
RUSSIA
------
Arizk 3.00 12/20/2030 RUB 46.44
Kuzbassenergo-Fina 8.70 4/15/2021 RUB 72.01
Mechel 8.40 5/27/2021 RUB 70.02
Mechel 8.40 6/1/2021 RUB 70.13
Mechel 8.40 5/27/2021 RUB 70.21
Mobile Telesystems 5.00 6/29/2021 RUB 74.25
MORTGAGE AGENT AHM 3.00 9/9/2045 RUB 9.17
Novosibirsk TIN Pl 12.50 8/26/2014 RUB 5.00
RBC OJSC 3.27 4/19/2018 RUB 51.50
Russian Railways J 8.40 6/8/2028 RUB 100.00
Saturn Research & 8.50 6/6/2014 RUB 1.01
TGC-2 12.00 10/10/2018 RUB 75.00
World of Building 4.20 6/25/2019 RUB 3.60
SPAIN
-----
Autonomous Communi 4.25 10/31/2036 EUR 65.75
Autonomous Communi 4.22 4/26/2035 EUR 64.14
Autonomous Communi 4.69 10/28/2034 EUR 68.88
Autonomous Communi 2.97 9/8/2039 JPY 59.88
Autonomous Communi 0.48 10/17/2022 EUR 70.50
Autonomous Communi 2.10 5/20/2024 EUR 73.97
Autonomous Communi 0.27 11/29/2021 EUR 74.92
Banco de Castilla 1.50 6/23/2021 EUR 65.00
Bankinter SA 6.00 12/18/2028 EUR 65.13
City of Madrid Spa 0.34 10/10/2022 EUR 66.37
City of Madrid Spa 4.55 6/16/2036 EUR 73.57
Comunidad Autonoma 3.90 11/30/2035 EUR 63.84
Comunidad Autonoma 4.20 10/25/2036 EUR 66.58
Comunidad Autonoma 4.06 11/23/2035 EUR 63.94
Diputacion Foral d 4.32 12/29/2023 EUR 61.41
Ibercaja Banco SAU 1.09 4/20/2018 EUR 70.93
Junta Comunidades 0.41 12/5/2023 EUR 54.38
Junta Comunidades 3.88 1/31/2036 EUR 60.38
Junta de Extremadu 0.95 6/10/2024 EUR 72.31
Pescanova SA 5.13 4/20/2017 EUR 18.74
Pescanova SA 8.75 2/17/2019 EUR 17.79
Pescanova SA 6.75 3/5/2015 EUR 17.96
Spain Government I 2.92 12/2/2030 JPY 69.99
SWEDEN
------
Dannemora Mineral 11.75 3/22/2016 USD 41.50
Northland Resource 4.00 10/15/2020 USD 6.63
Northland Resource 4.00 10/15/2020 NOK 7.00
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 9/14/2016 BRL 74.58
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 2/22/2022 ZAR 46.97
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 6/29/2017 IDR 73.20
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 1/31/2022 ZAR 47.32
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 6/28/2022 ZAR 45.13
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 3/19/2018 IDR 68.74
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 8/28/2018 BRL 59.21
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 3/15/2022 ZAR 46.66
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 8/26/2021 AUD 68.36
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 12/17/2027 USD 60.33
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 12/14/2016 BRL 72.32
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 9/28/2017 IDR 71.27
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 2/3/2017 BRL 70.83
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 7/21/2017 BRL 67.44
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 12/21/2016 BRL 72.17
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 9/20/2017 TRY 71.95
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 12/22/2016 BRL 72.19
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 8/28/2020 TRY 54.02
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 9/5/2017 IDR 71.10
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 3/10/2017 BRL 70.65
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 1/26/2017 BRL 71.31
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 6/30/2017 BRL 67.86
Svensk Exportkredi 1.00 11/15/2021 AUD 72.00
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 6/21/2017 BRL 68.05
Svensk Exportkredi 0.50 8/25/2021 ZAR 56.85
SWITZERLAND
-----------
UBS AG 24.75 1/3/2014 EUR 66.60
Banque Cantonale V 11.80 1/29/2014 CHF 63.63
Banque Cantonale V 6.50 10/5/2015 CHF 72.74
Banque Cantonale V 2.00 7/8/2014 CHF 61.29
SAir Group 6.25 10/27/2002 CHF 11.00
SAir Group 4.25 2/2/2007 CHF 11.63
SAir Group 2.13 11/4/2004 CHF 11.00
SAir Group 0.13 7/7/2005 CHF 11.25
SAir Group 5.50 7/23/2003 CHF 11.00
SAir Group 2.75 7/30/2004 CHF 11.00
SAir Group 2.75 7/30/2004 CHF 11.13
SAir Group 6.25 4/12/2005 CHF 10.88
UBS AG 24.50 1/3/2014 EUR 53.44
UBS AG 23.75 1/3/2014 EUR 58.46
UBS AG 8.87 4/15/2014 USD 10.17
UBS AG 24.00 1/3/2014 EUR 71.67
UBS AG 24.25 1/3/2014 EUR 60.63
UBS AG 18.45 10/24/2013 USD 8.73
UBS AG 14.25 1/3/2014 EUR 52.30
UBS AG 20.00 1/3/2014 EUR 56.56
UBS AG 7.25 7/29/2014 USD 31.57
UBS AG 6.03 5/14/2014 USD 54.95
UBS AG 24.50 1/3/2014 EUR 67.05
UBS AG 7.50 1/3/2014 EUR 64.51
UBS AG 12.70 4/22/2014 USD 66.71
UBS AG 8.94 2/13/2014 USD 14.64
UBS AG 6.29 2/26/2014 USD 32.99
UBS AG 6.22 2/26/2014 USD 38.93
UBS AG 24.00 1/3/2014 EUR 72.58
UBS AG 16.50 1/3/2014 EUR 69.19
UBS AG 18.25 1/3/2014 EUR 62.22
UBS AG 18.75 1/3/2014 EUR 66.02
UBS AG 20.25 1/3/2014 EUR 63.41
UBS AG 17.25 1/3/2014 EUR 42.91
UBS AG 11.50 1/3/2014 EUR 52.05
UBS AG 15.50 1/3/2014 EUR 72.73
UBS AG 22.00 1/3/2014 EUR 61.74
UBS AG 17.75 1/3/2014 EUR 68.54
UBS AG 6.04 8/29/2014 USD 35.75
UBS AG 10.46 1/2/2014 USD 35.35
UBS AG 8.75 1/3/2014 EUR 69.50
UBS AG 15.25 1/3/2014 EUR 63.26
UBS AG 10.75 1/3/2014 EUR 69.94
UBS AG 12.50 1/3/2014 EUR 62.75
UBS AG 19.00 1/3/2014 EUR 53.05
UBS AG 14.25 1/3/2014 EUR 70.59
UBS AG 20.50 1/3/2014 EUR 69.50
UBS AG 8.50 1/3/2014 EUR 69.72
UBS AG 24.00 1/3/2014 EUR 63.30
UBS AG 22.25 1/3/2014 EUR 63.98
UBS AG 9.53 12/17/2013 USD 48.94
UBS AG 6.49 5/23/2014 USD 21.20
UBS AG 6.53 5/27/2014 USD 21.09
UBS AG 6.33 5/12/2014 USD 19.48
UBS AG 9.25 4/30/2014 USD 9.78
UBS AG 14.00 6/27/2014 EUR 55.27
UBS AG 11.75 6/27/2014 EUR 48.70
UBS AG 8.29 1/14/2014 USD 19.98
UBS AG 5.22 1/28/2014 USD 11.48
UBS AG 7.86 1/31/2014 USD 20.24
UBS AG 9.17 6/30/2014 USD 67.70
UBS AG 7.25 8/8/2014 USD 45.54
UBS AG 8.35 10/24/2013 USD 50.89
UBS AG 9.45 10/22/2013 USD 20.95
UBS AG 9.00 1/3/2014 EUR 48.64
UBS AG 14.75 1/3/2014 EUR 44.63
UBS AG 7.15 2/26/2014 USD 32.50
UBS AG 10.75 1/3/2014 EUR 55.72
UBS AG 5.00 1/3/2014 EUR 63.46
UBS AG 8.21 2/26/2014 USD 50.39
UBS AG 10.00 1/3/2014 EUR 43.67
UBS AG 13.50 1/3/2014 EUR 56.28
UBS AG 13.75 1/3/2014 EUR 56.97
UBS AG 10.00 1/3/2014 EUR 62.22
UBS AG 8.25 1/3/2014 EUR 62.15
UBS AG 23.00 1/3/2014 EUR 69.99
UBS AG 18.75 1/3/2014 EUR 69.15
UBS AG 7.25 1/3/2014 EUR 69.51
UBS AG 23.25 1/3/2014 EUR 48.61
UBS AG 22.75 1/3/2014 EUR 59.35
UBS AG 21.50 1/3/2014 EUR 61.38
UBS AG 17.50 1/3/2014 EUR 68.73
UBS AG 14.50 1/3/2014 EUR 74.99
UBS AG 16.00 1/3/2014 EUR 71.69
UBS AG 21.00 1/3/2014 EUR 38.60
UBS AG 6.19 1/8/2014 USD 19.82
UBS AG 9.93 6/18/2014 USD 50.46
UBS AG 9.89 11/22/2013 EUR 71.22
UBS AG 8.00 1/3/2014 EUR 55.16
UBS AG 4.75 1/3/2014 EUR 69.04
UBS AG 4.50 6/27/2014 EUR 48.72
UBS AG 8.75 6/27/2014 EUR 58.09
UBS AG 6.80 2/20/2014 USD 27.83
UBS AG 6.80 2/20/2014 USD 27.76
UBS AG 5.50 3/28/2014 EUR 55.86
UBS AG 9.50 3/28/2014 EUR 50.93
UBS AG 13.50 3/28/2014 EUR 62.47
UBS AG 12.00 3/28/2014 EUR 42.70
UBS AG 11.50 1/3/2014 EUR 39.79
UBS AG 14.00 3/28/2014 EUR 52.93
UBS AG 7.75 6/27/2014 EUR 45.94
UBS AG 6.00 3/28/2014 EUR 49.43
UBS AG 7.00 6/27/2014 EUR 50.45
UBS AG 11.00 3/28/2014 EUR 46.42
UBS AG 11.00 6/27/2014 EUR 59.64
UBS AG 13.00 6/27/2014 EUR 45.50
UBS AG 13.00 1/3/2014 EUR 59.17
UBS AG 10.75 3/28/2014 EUR 58.16
UBS AG 5.00 6/27/2014 EUR 63.87
UBS AG 10.50 6/27/2014 EUR 52.89
UBS AG 12.25 6/27/2014 EUR 71.08
UBS AG 6.25 6/27/2014 EUR 56.36
UBS AG 11.25 3/28/2014 EUR 72.74
UBS AG 11.00 1/3/2014 EUR 70.06
UBS AG 12.25 3/28/2014 EUR 68.98
UBS AG 12.00 1/3/2014 EUR 66.02
UBS AG 13.75 6/27/2014 EUR 65.24
UBS AG 8.00 3/28/2014 EUR 56.96
UBS AG 20.25 1/3/2014 EUR 67.22
UBS AG 24.50 1/3/2014 EUR 59.05
UBS AG 21.75 1/3/2014 EUR 58.98
UBS AG 12.25 1/3/2014 EUR 52.20
UBS AG 18.00 1/3/2014 EUR 64.27
UBS AG 24.75 1/3/2014 EUR 54.61
UBS AG 22.00 1/3/2014 EUR 63.63
UBS AG 19.25 1/3/2014 EUR 71.52
UBS AG 23.50 1/3/2014 EUR 72.60
UBS AG 18.50 1/3/2014 EUR 71.37
UBS AG 6.50 1/3/2014 EUR 63.77
UBS AG 13.00 1/3/2014 EUR 49.48
UBS AG 5.75 1/3/2014 EUR 54.70
UBS AG 4.25 1/3/2014 EUR 54.36
UBS AG 6.25 1/3/2014 EUR 48.11
UBS AG 20.00 1/3/2014 EUR 64.93
UBS AG 14.41 11/21/2013 USD 40.01
UBS AG 23.25 1/3/2014 EUR 65.06
UBS AG 15.50 1/3/2014 EUR 45.13
UBS AG 18.25 1/3/2014 EUR 41.49
UBS AG 6.75 1/3/2014 EUR 68.80
UBS AG 20.75 1/3/2014 EUR 70.05
UBS AG 16.25 1/3/2014 EUR 72.22
UBS AG 19.75 1/3/2014 EUR 64.89
UBS AG 10.00 1/3/2014 EUR 55.96
UBS AG 13.75 1/3/2014 EUR 47.78
UBS AG 12.50 1/3/2014 EUR 49.77
UBS AG 8.50 1/3/2014 EUR 60.73
UBS AG 23.50 1/3/2014 EUR 36.11
UBS AG 22.75 1/3/2014 EUR 59.75
UBS AG 19.50 1/3/2014 EUR 65.22
UBS AG 20.50 1/3/2014 EUR 70.00
UBS AG 23.50 1/3/2014 EUR 72.59
UBS AG 18.25 1/3/2014 EUR 41.55
UBS AG 24.75 1/3/2014 EUR 72.66
UBS AG 17.50 1/3/2014 EUR 69.19
UBS AG 21.50 1/3/2014 EUR 61.80
UBS AG 7.98 3/17/2014 USD 10.60
UBS AG 14.75 3/28/2014 EUR 71.70
UBS AG 11.50 6/27/2014 EUR 74.62
UBS AG 4.50 3/28/2014 EUR 64.14
UBS AG 6.50 3/28/2014 EUR 44.45
UBS AG 7.30 7/7/2014 USD 28.53
TURKEY
------
APP International 11.75 10/1/2005 USD 5.00
Yuksel Insaat AS 9.50 11/10/2015 USD 72.64
UKRAINE
-------
Agroton Public Ltd 12.50 7/14/2014 USD 50.00
UNITED KINGDOM
--------------
Alpha Credit Group 0.73 2/21/2021 EUR 52.38
Alpha Credit Group 6.00 7/29/2020 EUR 72.88
Barclays Bank PLC 0.61 12/28/2040 EUR 64.00
Barclays Bank PLC 8.00 5/23/2014 USD 10.81
Barclays Bank PLC 2.20 11/30/2025 USD 21.86
Barclays Bank PLC 0.50 3/13/2023 RUB 47.04
Barclays Bank PLC 6.75 10/16/2015 GBP 1.15
Barclays Bank PLC 7.40 2/13/2014 GBP 1.04
Barclays Bank PLC 2.50 3/7/2017 EUR 35.67
Barclays Bank PLC 8.25 1/26/2015 USD 1.13
Barclays Bank PLC 1.99 12/1/2040 USD 71.38
Barclays Bank PLC 1.64 6/3/2041 USD 66.57
Barclays Bank PLC 7.50 4/29/2014 GBP 1.06
Barclays Bank PLC 2.33 1/2/2041 USD 73.08
Cattles Ltd 6.88 1/17/2014 GBP 2.50
Cattles Ltd 7.13 7/5/2017 GBP 2.50
Commercial Bank Pr 5.80 2/9/2016 USD 69.01
Co-Operative Bank 9.25 4/28/2021 GBP 72.74
Co-Operative Bank 5.75 12/2/2024 GBP 68.46
Co-Operative Bank 7.88 12/19/2022 GBP 70.52
Co-Operative Bank 5.88 3/28/2033 GBP 69.57
Co-Operative Bank 5.63 11/16/2021 GBP 55.13
Co-Operative Bank 1.01 5/18/2016 EUR 69.71
Credit Suisse AG/L 11.50 4/4/2014 CHF 70.01
Credit Suisse AG/L 8.50 11/5/2013 CHF 45.66
Credit Suisse AG/L 6.50 1/14/2014 CHF 55.22
Credit Suisse AG/L 9.00 11/14/2013 CHF 51.41
Credit Suisse AG/L 1.64 6/1/2042 USD 46.62
Credit Suisse AG/L 8.00 1/14/2014 USD 55.38
Credit Suisse AG/L 6.85 8/8/2014 USD 57.36
Credit Suisse AG/L 10.50 11/15/2013 USD 51.48
Credit Suisse Inte 4.40 10/24/2013 EUR 57.10
Credit Suisse Inte 4.45 12/13/2013 EUR 53.20
Dunfermline Buildi 6.00 3/31/2015 GBP 1.38
Emporiki Group Fin 5.00 2/24/2022 EUR 60.75
Emporiki Group Fin 5.00 12/2/2021 EUR 61.13
Emporiki Group Fin 5.10 12/9/2021 EUR 62.13
ERB Hellas PLC 0.52 9/3/2014 EUR 72.13
Goldman Sachs Inte 2.50 8/17/2018 EUR 20.40
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 4/3/2023 AUD 62.86
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 12/2/2022 AUD 64.19
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 2/24/2023 AUD 63.27
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 10/25/2021 AUD 68.62
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 11/30/2021 NZD 65.52
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 12/20/2018 RUB 69.82
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 6/30/2021 NZD 67.16
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 2/2/2023 AUD 63.51
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 12/29/2022 AUD 63.89
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 2/5/2018 RUB 74.86
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 3/1/2018 RUB 74.48
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 4/27/2027 NZD 47.02
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 11/22/2021 AUD 68.35
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 7/30/2027 NZD 46.29
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 1/29/2027 NZD 47.70
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 10/30/2026 NZD 48.42
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 12/29/2026 AUD 50.10
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 12/8/2026 AUD 50.28
HSBC Bank PLC 0.50 2/24/2027 NZD 47.50
Royal Bank of Scot 1.69 11/14/2016 GBP 1.10
RSL Communications 10.50 11/15/2008 USD 1.20
RSL Communications 10.13 3/1/2008 USD 1.25
RSL Communications 9.13 3/1/2008 USD 1.25
RSL Communications 9.88 11/15/2009 USD 1.25
RSL Communications 12.00 11/1/2008 USD 1.25
UBS AG/London 25.00 3/20/2014 CHF 62.25
UBS AG/London 7.63 9/30/2015 USD 16.71
UBS AG/London 20.25 4/17/2014 CHF 66.13
UBS AG/London 6.88 8/31/2015 USD 15.37
*********
Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par. Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable. Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate. The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication. Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades. Prices for actual
trades are probably different. Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind. It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers'
public debt and equity securities about which we report.
Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than US$3 per
share in public markets. At first glance, this list may look
like the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell
short. Don't be fooled. Assets, for example, reported at
historical cost net of depreciation may understate the true value
of a firm's assets. A company may establish reserves on its
balance sheet for liabilities that may never materialize. The
prices at which equity securities trade in public market are
determined by more than a balance sheet solvency test.
Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book
of interest to troubled company professionals. All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com. Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/booksto order any title today.
*********
S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N
Troubled Company Reporter-Europe is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Valerie U. Pascual, Marites O. Claro, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez,
Joy A. Agravante, Ivy B. Magdadaro, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.
Copyright 2014. All rights reserved. ISSN 1529-2754.
This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.
Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.
The TCR Europe subscription rate is US$775 per half-year,
delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for
members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription
or balance thereof are US$25 each. For subscription information,
contact Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at
202-241-8200.
* * * End of Transmission * * *