/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCRAP_Public/211104.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                     A S I A   P A C I F I C

          Thursday, November 4, 2021, Vol. 24, No. 215

                           Headlines



A U S T R A L I A

CRIXUS PTY: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for Nov. 11
GREGORY HIGHWAY: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for Nov. 12
MJW BUILDING: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for Nov. 10
WISEYIELD INVESTMENTS: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for Nov. 11


C H I N A

BYTON LTD: Misses Payroll as Court Starts Bankruptcy Hearings
HNA GROUP: Court Approves Four Separate Restructuring Plans
HNA GROUP: Lender Seizes Hong Kong Mansion Linked to Dennis Chen
SHINSUN HOLDINGS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B-', Outlook Negative
YANGO GROUP: Fitch Lowers LT Foreign Currency IDR to 'C'



I N D I A

ABF ENGINEERING: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
AMB FOOD: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
ARBIND COLD: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
BABA JHARESHWAR: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
ESSAR POWER: Adani Power Gets NCLT Nod to Acquire Mahan Project

EVEREST SEA: CARE Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
FABRICO INDIA: CARE Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
FLIC MICROWAVES: CARE Lowers Rating on INR12.33cr Loan to D
GLOW MAC: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
GURVINDER SINGH: CARE Lowers Rating on INR2.00cr LT Loan to C

HANWANT FASTNERS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
HIM CYLINDERS: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
IL&FS LTD: Resolves INR52,200cr Debt as of End of October
INDIGO COLLECTIONS: CARE Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
JAI SAKTHI: CARE Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category

KAIZEN AUTOCARS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
KALOSONA HIMGHAR: CARE Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
KARLA CONSTRUCTIONS: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
LODHI RAJPOOT: CARE Lowers Rating on INR6.05cr LT Loan to B
LORDS TRAVELS: CARE Lowers Rating on INR5.00cr LT Loan to B+

M & T CONSTRUCTIONS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
MA MAHAMAYA: CARE Lowers Rating on INR9.36cr LT Loan to D
MACROTECH DEVELOPERS: Moody's Upgrades CFR to B3, Outlook Positive
NIMBUS MOTORS: CARE Lowers Rating on INR32.50CR LT Loan to C
PRAKASH STEELAGE: CARE Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating

PRAVARA RENEWABLE: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
PRITI GEMS: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
R K CHAVAN: CARE Lowers Rating on INR12.37cr LT Loan to C
TATA POWER: S&P Assigns 'BB' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable


J A P A N

JAPAN AIRLINES: Forecasts Full-Year Net Loss of US$1.28 Billion


M A L A Y S I A

SERBA DINAMIK: Fitch Lowers LT IDR to 'CCC-'


N E W   Z E A L A N D

PROTECTCRETE NZ: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due Dec. 2


S I N G A P O R E

EAGLE HOSPITALITY: Plan Hearing Slated for Mid-December
EAGLE HOSPITALITY: Settles With Creditors, Files Bankruptcy Plan
EAGLE HOSPITALITY: US Trustee Calls Chapter 11 Docs Convoluted
GLOBAL APPAREL: Court to Hear Wind-Up Petition on Nov. 19
GREENBACK ECOMMERCE: Commences Wind-Up Proceedings

MOPU HOLDINGS: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due Nov. 30
STRAITS VENTURA: Court Enters Wind-Up Order
UOL DEVELOPMENT: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due Nov. 29

                           - - - - -


=================
A U S T R A L I A
=================

CRIXUS PTY: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for Nov. 11
-----------------------------------------------------
A second meeting of creditors in the proceedings of Crixus Pty Ltd
has been set for Nov. 11, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. via online video
conference using Zoom meeting software.

The purpose of the meeting is (1) to receive the report by the
Administrator about the business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances of the Company; and (2) for the creditors of the
Company to resolve whether the Company will execute a deed of
company arrangement, the administration should end, or the Company
be wound up.

Creditors wishing to attend are advised proofs and proxies should
be submitted to the Administrator by Nov. 10, 2021, at 4:00 p.m.

Jack James and Paula Smith of Rodgers Reidy were appointed as
administrators of Crixus Pty on Oct. 7, 2021.


GREGORY HIGHWAY: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for Nov. 12
----------------------------------------------------------
A second meeting of creditors in the proceedings of Gregory Highway
Roadhouse Pty Ltd has been set for Nov. 12, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. via
teleconference facility.

The purpose of the meeting is (1) to receive the report by the
Administrator about the business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances of the Company; and (2) for the creditors of the
Company to resolve whether the Company will execute a deed of
company arrangement, the administration should end, or the Company
be wound up.

Creditors wishing to attend are advised proofs and proxies should
be submitted to the Administrator by Nov. 11, 2021, at 4:30 p.m.

Brendan Nixon of SM Solvency Accountants was appointed as
administrator of Gregory Highway on Oct. 8, 2021.


MJW BUILDING: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for Nov. 10
-------------------------------------------------------
A second meeting of creditors in the proceedings of MJW Building
Pty Ltd has been set for Nov. 10, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. via online
video conference using Zoom meeting software.

The purpose of the meeting is (1) to receive the report by the
Administrator about the business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances of the Company; and (2) for the creditors of the
Company to resolve whether the Company will execute a deed of
company arrangement, the administration should end, or the Company
be wound up.

Creditors wishing to attend are advised proofs and proxies should
be submitted to the Administrator by Nov. 9, 2021, at 4:00 p.m.

Jeremy Joseph Nipps and Clifford Stuart Rocke of Cor Cordis were
appointed as administrators of MJW Building on Oct. 6, 2021.

WISEYIELD INVESTMENTS: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for Nov. 11
----------------------------------------------------------------
A second meeting of creditors in the proceedings of Wiseyield
Investments Pty Ltd, trading as Boliver International, has been set
for Nov. 11, 2021, at 10:30 a.m. via virtual meeting technology.  

The purpose of the meeting is (1) to receive the report by the
Administrator about the business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances of the Company; and (2) for the creditors of the
Company to resolve whether the Company will execute a deed of
company arrangement, the administration should end, or the Company
be wound up.

Creditors wishing to attend are advised proofs and proxies should
be submitted to the Administrator by Nov. 10, 2021, at 5:00 p.m.

Mervyn Jonathan Kitay of Worrells Solvency & Forensic Accountants
was appointed as administrator of Wiseyield Investments on Oct. 7,
2021.




=========
C H I N A
=========

BYTON LTD: Misses Payroll as Court Starts Bankruptcy Hearings
-------------------------------------------------------------
Caixin Global reports that Byton Ltd., a formerly high-flying
Chinese electric-vehicle startup, missed payments to workers and
idled production lines as a local court started bankruptcy
hearings.

Caixin relates that a court in Nanjing, Jiangsu province, held a
hearing Nov. 1 on the request of Shanghai Huaxun Network System
Co., a Byton creditor. Shanghai Huaxun demanded a bankruptcy
proceeding for Nanjing Zhixing New Energy Vehicle Technology
Development Co., Byton's main business unit.

Byton suspended worker payrolls while its factories halted
operations, according to a person close to the company, Caixin
relays.  Byton, which unveiled its first M-Byte concept car in
2018, has yet to start commercial production that was originally
scheduled for 2019. Even if the company could launch products soon,
Byton cars would not be competitive with rivals under current
market conditions, the person, as cited by Caixin, said.

Byton Ltd. operates as an electric vehicle company that designs
cars as a fully connected smart device on wheels.


HNA GROUP: Court Approves Four Separate Restructuring Plans
-----------------------------------------------------------
Caixin Global reports that HNA Group Co. Ltd. has received court
approval for its restructuring plan just days after its creditors
gave their OK, clearing two major hurdles for the debt-ridden
conglomerate to move forward with the bankruptcy reorganization
that began earlier this year.

In its ruling on Oct. 30, the Hainan High People's Court approved
four separate restructuring plans, one each for its airline,
airport, and retail businesses, as well as one for the conglomerate
itself, according to a company WeChat post, Caixin relays.

About two weeks earlier, HNA's creditors voted to approve the debt
restructuring plans, the company said in a separate WeChat post.
Under these plans, Hainan Airlines Holding Co. Ltd. and 10
affiliates will repay CNY161.3 billion of the roughly CNY400
billion sought by their 4,915 creditors. HNA Infrastructure
Investment Group Co. Ltd. and its 20 subsdiaries will repay CNY95.2
billion of the CNY189 billion sought by 3,242 creditors. And HNA's
retail unit will pay back CNY23.6 billion of the more than CNY33
billion demanded by over 5,600 creditors. Only a portion of the
debt will be repaid in cash, according to the plans.

According to Caixin, creditors will be paid off within 10 years,
starting from 2022, with interest paid annually on one or two days.
From the second or the fourth year on, the principal will also be
repaid in rising increments, starting at as low as 2% and going to
20%.

HNA's restructuring is one of China's largest bankruptcy cases.
Caixin relates that the company's financial problems are the result
of a freewheeling era in which Chinese conglomerates went on a
global spending spree for trophy assets that they financed by
taking on enormous debt. It was during this time that HNA attracted
global attention by investing in big international names like
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Deutsche Bank AG.

However, this debt-fueled acquisition strategy eventually forced
HNA into a hard landing after the government tightened financing
rules and oversight on overseas asset purchases in 2017. By the end
of that year, HNA's assets had ballooned to CNY1.23 trillion and it
had CNY740 million in total debt.

In January, HNA's creditors petitioned a court to force the company
into bankruptcy restructuring.

According to a plan worked out by a government-appointed task
force, HNA will become a holding company with no specific
operations, but it will be responsible for repaying all of its own
debts and those of its subsidiaries after the restructuring. The
company will be managed by a creditor committee or asset management
company, while its units are supposed to bring on strategic
investors to improve their financial positions.

In mid-September, two state-controlled firms, Liaoning Fangda Group
Industrial Co. Ltd. and Hainan Development Holdings Co. Ltd.,
separately won the deal for stakes in HNA's airline and airport
units. The deals cover two Shanghai-listed companies — Hainan
Airlines and HNA Infrastructure Investment.

HNA is still seeking strategic investors for its retail businesses,
which include Shenzhen-listed CCOOP Group Co. Ltd. and Hong
Kong-listed China Shun Ke Long Holdings Ltd.


HNA GROUP: Lender Seizes Hong Kong Mansion Linked to Dennis Chen
----------------------------------------------------------------
Caixin Global reports that a mountaintop mansion in Hong Kong
linked to Dennis Chen - removed last month as HNA Group Co.'s
investment chief - has become the latest luxury property linked to
the group to be placed in foreclosure ahead of a possible sale.

House 6 on Twelve Peaks, a posh development on Hong Kong Island's
Victoria Peak, was seized by the lender on Oct. 15, Caixin
discloses citing records from the Land Registry of the Hong Kong
SAR.

Chen, who is also known as Chen Chao, was removed from his position
as chief investment officer at the troubled HNA Group in September,
according to Caixin. His uncle, group chairman Chen Feng, was taken
in by police that same month.

                          About HNA Group

China-based HNA Group Co. Ltd. offers airlines services. The
Company provides domestic and international aviation
transportation, air travel, aviation maintenance, and aviation
logistics services. HNA Group also operates holding, capital,
tourism, logistics, and other business.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific, HNA
Group on Jan. 29, 2021 declared bankruptcy and restructuring after
a multi-year debt and liquidity crisis. The company was informed by
South China's Hainan High People's Court on Jan. 29 that "because
the company is unable to pay off its debts, related creditors
appealed to the court for the company's bankruptcy and
restructuring," HNA said.

According to Global Times, HNA Group said it will cooperate with
the court for judicial review, carry forward the debt disposal, and
support the court's protection of the legal rights of its creditors
so as to ensure the smooth operations of the company.

On March 15, 2021, a court in Hainan approved the merger and
restructuring of 320 affiliates of HNA Group into the parent
company, paving way for the conglomerate to eventually emerge from
bankruptcy, Caixin Global said.

HNA Group was designated as administrator of the merger, and
creditors will hold their first meeting June 4, according to a
statement issued March 15 by the Hainan High People's Court. The
320 units will be integrated into HNA group's bankruptcy
reorganization, and the group will submit a restructuring plan to
the creditor meeting for approval, the court said.


SHINSUN HOLDINGS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B-', Outlook Negative
--------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov. 2, S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on
Shinsun Holdings (Group) Co. Ltd. to 'B-' from 'B'. S&P also
lowered its long-term issue rating on the company's U.S. dollar
notes to 'CCC+' from 'B-'.

The negative outlook on Shinsun reflects S&P's view that continuous
repayment of maturities with cash will hamper the company's
liquidity over the next 12 months.

S&P said, "The downgrade reflects our view that Shinsun will face
heightened operational challenges in the next one to two years.
These challenges include a potential drop in contracted sales and a
slowdown in the cash collection rate due to tight mortgage policies
in China. The company's attributable contracted sales dropped by
60% to Chinese renminbi (RMB) 14.6 billion in the third quarter of
2021, compared with the second quarter of 2021. Sales further
deteriorated to only RMB3.4 billion in September. In our view, this
decline was due to Shinsun's land bank exposure mainly in
lower-tier cities, albeit in the more economically developed
Yangtze River Delta (YRD).

"Shinsun faces repayment pressure from nonbank financing. We
believe the company will face difficulty in refinancing or rolling
over its trust loans. This is because a policy clampdown by the
government has made trust companies more selective in extending
such financing. Shinsun has total RMB23.4 billion of trust and
other financings (RMB15.9 billion and RMB7.5 billion, respectively)
as of June 30, 2021, equivalent to about 50% of its debt. The
company repaid RMB3 billion-RMB4 billion of trust loans and bank
loans in the third quarter of 2021, which indicates potentially
narrowing funding access. In our view, Shinsun's use of its cash on
hand for debt repayment will reduce its resources for new land
acquisition or construction.

"Significant minority interest weakens Shinsun's financial
transparency. We believe the company will continue to introduce
more minority interest partners in its consolidated projects to
share the investment burden. This will reduce Shinsun's
attributable ratio in these projects to about 70% in 2021 from
about 80% in 2020." The decline in attributable ratio may hurt
revenue recognition during 2022-2023.

Shinsun's increased involvement in joint venture projects could
lower its autonomy in mobilizing cash from project companies.
Shinsun's cash level could be further depleted if it decides to buy
back stakes from its minority interest partners as these projects
progress.

Shinsun's financing channels have narrowed owing to its impaired
access to capital markets. S&P believes the company's access to the
offshore capital market is highly uncertain. This is given the
volatility in Shinsun's U.S. dollar bond prices and the current
unfavorable market sentiment. The company will very likely need to
repay offshore maturities using internal resources. Shinsun has
US$300 million bond due in January 2022 and two other U.S. dollar
bonds totaling US$400 million due in June 2022 and August 2023.

Shinsun should be able to manage its US$300 million maturity in
January 2022. The company raised US$200 million in bonds in August
this year to refinance its US$300 million bond due in January next
year. S&P said, "We estimate Shinsin had accessible cash on hand of
RMB15 billion as of end-June 2021. This will mostly cover its RMB22
billion in short-term maturities and support repayment capacity. We
did not include the company's RMB7.9 billon of "cash from property
pre-sales proceeds" and RMB3.8 billion "pledged deposit" in
estimating the accessible cash."

S&P said, "The negative outlook on Shinsun reflects our view of the
company's weak capital structure due to its large exposure to
nonbank financing. Shinsun should be able to manage its repayment
obligations over the next year including its offshore maturities.
However, accelerated repayment of trust loans and a potential
buyback of minority interest could hamper the company's liquidity
standing over the next 12 months.

"We may lower the rating if Shinsun's liquidity shows signs of
marked deterioration, possibly due to a significant slippage in
contracted sales, refinancing difficulties in any of the funding
channels, or escalation of debt repayment in trust loan or other
borrowings. Material cash depletion or a sharp increase in funding
costs could signal such deterioration."

S&P could revise the outlook to stable if:

-- Shinsun consistently demonstrates adequate liquidity with
sufficient cash on hand to cover short-term maturities even after
the company pays down offshore maturities with cash.

-- Shinsun's liquidity and capital structure improve such that the
ratio of liquidity sources to uses is sustainably above 1.0x. At
the same time, S&P would also expect the company to improve its
debt maturity profile such that weighted average maturities
lengthen to stably above two years.

YANGO GROUP: Fitch Lowers LT Foreign Currency IDR to 'C'
--------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded China-based property developer Yango
Group Co., Ltd.'s Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating
(IDR) to 'C' from 'B-'. Fitch has also downgraded Yango's senior
unsecured rating to 'C' from 'B-' with the Recovery Rating lowered
to 'RR5' from 'RR4'.

The downgrades follow Yango's announced launch of an offer to
exchange its USD247 million senior notes due 2023, which are
puttable in November 2021, USD200 million senior notes due January
2022 and USD300 million senior notes due March 2022 into new notes
due September 2022, which Fitch considers a distressed debt
exchange (DDE) as per Fitch's criteria. The IDR will be downgraded
to 'RD' (Restricted Default) if the proposed exchange offer is
successfully carried out, and Fitch will subsequently re-rate
Yango's IDRs to a level that is consistent with the company's
post-exchange capital structure and risk profile, which would
likely be within a very low speculative-grade range.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Exchange Offer Constitutes a DDE: Fitch expects both of the
following to apply when considering whether a debt exchange should
be classified as a DDE: the exchange imposes a material reduction
in terms compared with the original contractual terms; and the
exchange is conducted to avoid bankruptcy, similar insolvency or
intervention proceedings, or a traditional payment default. The
offer, if successful, would meet both of these terms.

Offer to Avoid Payment Default: Fitch believes the exchange offer
will help Yango to avoid a default in light of its tight liquidity.
The company's available cash balance dropped to around CNY21
billion by end-September 2021, while its ability to access the cash
for bond repayment is limited. The exchange offer memorandum also
states that the company may not be able to repay the existing notes
if the exchange is unsuccessful.

Material Reduction in Terms: Yango is offering USD25 in cash and
USD1,000 in new notes with an interest rate of 10.25% due September
2022. Fitch believes the exchange offer constitutes a material
reduction in the terms of the existing notes as the repayment is
being made in the form of new notes with an extended maturity date.
In addition, the new notes remove some of the restrictive covenants
of the existing notes.

Conditions of Exchange Offer: The company's obligation to
consummate the exchange offer is conditional upon, among other
things, the bondholders tendering not less than 85% in aggregate of
the outstanding principal amount of the existing notes. The company
reserves the right to amend, modify or waive, at any time, the
terms and conditions of the exchange offer.

Tighter Liquidity than Guidance: Management said cash restrictions
at project companies have tightened further since Yango reported
CNY33 billion in Fitch-defined available cash at end-1H21, slightly
more than the CNY26 billion in short-term debt. The company said in
the exchange offer memo that a significant portion of the cash
balance consisted of restricted funds and pre-sale regulated funds,
which may not be available for debt repayment at the holding
company. Certain non-bank borrowings were also called due to recent
rating actions.

Recovery Rating Lowered: The lowering of the Recovery Rating on the
senior unsecured debt of Yango to 'RR5', from 'RR4', reflects poor
recovery prospects. This was mainly driven by a continued increase
in trade payables by end-3Q21.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Yango's ratings reflect its DDE offer.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

KEY RECOVERY RATING ASSUMPTIONS

The recovery analysis assumes that Yango would be liquidated in a
bankruptcy as it is an asset-trading company.

-- Fitch has assumed a 10% administrative claim;

-- The liquidation estimate reflects Fitch's view of the value of
    balance-sheet assets that can be realised in sale or
    liquidation processes conducted during a bankruptcy or
    insolvency proceeding and distributed to creditors;

-- The 60% inventory advance rate is supported by a quality asset
    base, which can generate an EBITDA margin of below 20%;

-- Advance rate of 60% applied to property, plant and equipment;

-- Advance rate of 35% applied to investment properties, which
    generates a low rental yield of 2%;

-- Advance rate of 100% applied to unrestricted cash, while
    including 100% trade payables in the debt waterfall;

-- Advance rate of 100% applied to Fitch-defined restricted cash,
    which mainly consists of guarantees for the company's bank
    borrowings, mortgage loans and construction work;

-- The allocation of value in the liability waterfall results in
    recovery corresponding to 'RR5' for the senior unsecured debt.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Fitch will reassess Yango's capital structure and cash flow
    after the completion of the exchange offer, or if the offer is
    not completed, to determine its IDR and senior unsecured
    ratings.

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Fitch will downgrade Yango's IDR to 'RD' if the exchange offer
    is completed.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

ISSUER PROFILE

Yango is a property developer that mainly operates in the Yangtze
River Delta and Fujian province in China. It is one of the
country's top-20 property developers by total contracted sales.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch's calculation of net property assets used in the leverage
calculation includes: inventory, net deposits and prepayments for
projects, investment properties, property, plant and equipment
(land and buildings), land-use rights, investments in joint
ventures (JV), net amounts due from JVs, and net amount due from
non-controlling interests, less contract deposits and deposits
received.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.



=========
I N D I A
=========

ABF ENGINEERING: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of ABF
Engineering International Private Limited (AEIPL) continues to
remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       4.07       CARE C; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

   Short Term Bank      2.80       CARE A4; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 23, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of AEIPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
AEIPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. AEIPL continues to
be noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
September 08, 2021, September 18, 2021 and September 28, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

ABF Engineering International Private Limited (AEIPL) was
established in 2007 as a company to render manufacturing services
to industries and sectors such as construction, ship building,
petrochemical, Oil and Gas, Fertilizers, Chemical plants, Power
Sector, Pharma and Engineering Project Construction consultants.
ABF is certified by American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
for U and PP stamp to manufacture pressure vessels, piping
fabrication and accessories. ABF Engineering is registered with IBR
Act, 1950 to manufacture pressure parts and package boiler and
certified by Engineers India Limited (EIL) for procurement of
pressure vessels, and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited
(NPCIL) as a vendor for condensers, storage tanks, process piping,
structural fabrication, fabricated steel parts, Sheet metal parts
etc.


AMB FOOD: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
---------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of AMB Food
Products (AFP) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       5.25       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated November 13, 2020, placed
the rating(s) of AFP under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
AFP had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. AFP continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
September 29, 2021, October 9, 2021, October 19, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Indore-based (Madhya Pradesh) AFP was established in 2015 as a
partnership firm by four partners to undertake a green field
project for manufacturing of sweets, namkeen and fast food
primarily pizza, sandwich, franky and burger. AFP was setting-up a
new plant in Indore (Madhya Pradesh) with a proposed installed
capacity of manufacturing 1200 (MTPA) Metric Tonnes Per Annum of
sweets and namkeen.

ARBIND COLD: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Arbind Cold
Storage Private Limited (ACSPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       5.19       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated November 18, 2020, placed
the rating(s) of ACSPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category
as ACSPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. ACSPL continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
October 4, 2021, October 14, 2021, October 24, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Arbind Cold Storage Private Limited (ACSPL), incorporated in the
year 2008, is a Samashtipur (Bihar) based company, promoted by the
Mr. Amar Kumar, Mrs. Anupama Rani and Mrs. Indu Devi. It is engaged
in the business of providing cold storage services to potato
growing farmers and potato traders, having an installed storage
capacity of 90,000 quintals in Samashtipur district of Bihar. The
company is also engaged in trading of potato which contributed
around 43% of total operating income during FY19. Mr. Amar Kumar
(Director) looks after overall management of the company. Mr. Amar
Kumar has more than two decades of experience in cold storage
business and is supported by a team of experienced professionals
who have rich experience in the same line of business.


BABA JHARESHWAR: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Baba
Jhareshwar Multipurpose Himghar Private Limited (BJMHPL) continues
to remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      6.862       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 14, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of BJMHPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
BJMHPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. BJMHPL continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 30, 2021, September 9, 2021, September 19, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Baba Jhareswar Multipurpose Himghar Pvt. Ltd. (BJMHPL) was
incorporated in December 25, 2010 by Mr. Prabir Kumar Karan, Mrs.
Rupali Karan, Mr. Sukumar Karan, Mr. Bidyut Kumar Mal & Mr. Monojit
Kumar Mal of Medinipur, West Bengal to set up a cold storage
facility. The company commenced commercial operation from December,
2011. BJMHPL is engaged in the business of providing cold storage
facility for potatoes to local potato farmers and traders on a
rental basis, having a storage capacity of 3,50,000 Kgs of potatoes
in Medinipore district of West Bengal. Besides providing cold
storage facility, the company also works as a mediator between the
farmers and marketers of potato by taking advances from marketers
on behalf of the farmers in order to facilitate the sale of potato
stored, and it also provides interest bearing advances to farmers
for farming of potato against the potato stored. This apart it
provides additional services to farmers such as insurance of
potatoes stored & drying of potatoes.


ESSAR POWER: Adani Power Gets NCLT Nod to Acquire Mahan Project
---------------------------------------------------------------
Livemint.com reports that Adani Power on Oct. 27 said that it has
got National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) approval to acquire Essar
Power's 1,200 MW thermal power project in Mahan, Madhya Pradesh.

According to PTI, NCLT's Principal Bench at New Delhi in its order
dated November 1, 2021, approved the resolution plan submitted by
Adani Power Ltd for acquisition of EPMPL (Essar Power M P Ltd), a
company undergoing insolvency resolution under the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, Adani Power stated in a BSE filing, Livemint.com
relays.

EPMPL owns a 1,200 MW thermal power plant in Singrauli District,
Madhya Pradesh.

Livemint.com relates that the acquisition shall be subject to
satisfaction of conditions precedent mentioned under the Resolution
Plan, it stated.

Earlier in June this year, Adani Power had emerged as the
successful bidder for the Essar Power's 1,200 MW project.

According to industry sources, the deal size of the project is
estimated at around INR2,800-3,000 crore, Livemint.com adds.

                         About Essar Steel

Incorporated in 1976, Essar Steel India Ltd. is a part of the Essar
Group and is having 10 MTPA integrated steel manufacturing
facilities at Hazira, Gujarat and iron ore beneficiation and
pelletisation facilities in Paradeep, Odisha (12 mtpa) and Vizag,
Andhra Pradesh (8 mtpa). The company also owns and operates two
iron ore slurry pipelines -- one each in Odisha (Dabuna to Paradip)
and Andhra Pradesh (Kirandul-Vizag), which transport the iron ore
slurry from the beneficiation plant (located near the iron ore
mines in Dabuna and Kirandul) to the pellet plant (located near the
Paradip and Vizag ports). A large portion of the iron ore pellets
produced are intended for captive consumption by ESIL's steel plant
at Hazira for cost optimization.

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) - Ahmedabad Bench admitted
Essar Steel's insolvency case on Aug. 2, 2017.

Satish Kumar Gupta of Alvarez and Marsal India has been appointed
as interim resolution professional upon the suggestion of State
Bank of India (SBI).

Essar Steel owes more than INR45,000 crore to lenders, of which
INR31,671 crore had already been declared as non-performing as of
March 31, 2016, The Economic Times disclosed. The SBI-led
consortium of 22 creditors accounts for 93% of this amount. Essar
Steel owes $450.67 million to Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) in
debt.

EVEREST SEA: CARE Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
------------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Everest Sea
Foods Private Limited (ESFPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      10.10       CARE B+; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated September 29, 2020, placed
the rating(s) of ESFPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category
as ESFPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. ESFPL continues to
be noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 15, 2021, August 25, 2021 and September 4, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Mangalore-based, Everest Sea Foods Private Limited (ESFPL) was
incorporated on June 07, 2012 and started its commercial operations
in October 2012. The company is currently managed by Mr. Waseem
Machiwala, Mr. Sanjay K Jaokar, Mr. Sumeet Jaokar and Mr. Sindhuram
Puthram who has more than three decades of experience in the
seafood industry. The company is engaged in processing, packing and
exporting of marine products.


FABRICO INDIA: CARE Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Fabrico
India Private Limited (FIPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      39.50       CARE B; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated November 2, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of FIPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
FIPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. FIPL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
September 18, 2021, September 28, 2021, October 8, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Incorporated in 1975, FIPL is promoted by Mr Manmohan Gupta and
late Mr Brij Bhushan Singhal. The company initially started its
business operations with manufacturing of electrical products such
as transmission towers, power transformers, steel tubular poles and
other electrical hardware items. Subsequently in 2011, the company
also started executing projects for construction of sub-stations,
supply and laying of transmission cables, erecting tubular
poles/steel structures and rural electrification projects on
turnkey basis for various state electricity boards as well as state
government undertaking.


FLIC MICROWAVES: CARE Lowers Rating on INR12.33cr Loan to D
-----------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of Flic
Microwaves Private Limited (FMPL), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       12.33      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category and Revised from
                                   CARE B-; Stable

   Short Term Bank       2.25      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category and Revised from
                                   CARE A4

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated February 11, 2021, placed
the rating(s) of FMPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category
as FMPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. FMPL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
October 25, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

The rating assigned to the bank facilities of FMPL have been
revised on account of on-going delays in debt servicing recognized
from publicly available information.

Hyderabad-based Flic Microwave Private Limited (FMPL) was
established as a partnership firm in 1991 by Mr. Prasantha Pradhan
and Mrs. Nivedita Mohanty. Later, the constitution of the firm
changed to Private Limited Company in August 1992. FMPL is engaged
in manufacturing of Microwaves. The Company majorly deals in
Components, Super Components, Sub Systems and EM Systems, etc. FMPL
imports raw material i.e. electrical components from USA and sells
the final product in domestic market. The company majorly deals
with public sector entities such as Defence Research Development
Organisation (DRDO), Bharat Electronics Limited, Defense
Electronics Research Laboratory, Defence Avionocs Research
Establishment, etc. The key person of the company is Mr. Sukumar
Pradhan (Managing Director) with post-graduation in Electronics, he
has nine years experience as a scientist in Defence Research
Development Organisation (DRDO). The company has installed capacity
of 500 units per annum.

GLOW MAC: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
--------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Glow Mac
Lighting Private Limited (GMLPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      10.00       CARE C; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 5, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of GMLPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
GMLPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. GMLPL continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 21, 2021, August 31, 2021, September 10, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Rajasthan-based Glow Mac lighting Private Limited (GMLPL),
incorporated in February 18, 2008, and is being managed by Mr. Arun
Kumar Jain and Mr. Vibhor Jain. The company is engaged in the
manufacturing of various electrical items such as LED (Light
Emitting Diode) and Non-LED lights such as Garden Light, Bollard
light, Wall Light, Street Light Pole etc and fittings and fixtures
at its manufacturing facility located in Bhiwadi (Rajasthan). The
main raw material for the company includes various electrical
components such as copper, aluminium conductor, transformers,
raisins, pipes, etc. which the company procures mainly from various
wholesalers available local.

GURVINDER SINGH: CARE Lowers Rating on INR2.00cr LT Loan to C
-------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of
Gurvinder Singh (GS), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       2.00       CARE C; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category and
                                   Revised from CARE B-; Stable

   Short Term Bank      4.30       CARE A4; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 28, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of GS under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as GS
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. GS continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
September 13, 2021, September 23, 2021, October 3, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

The rating has revised on account of non-availability of requisite
information.

Gurvinder Singh (GVS) is a proprietorship firm established in 2008
by Mr. Gurvinder Singh (aged 47 years). The firm is engaged in
providing services as transport contractor to Food Corporation of
India (FCI) for the transportation of food grains from one center
of FCI to anther center of FCI in different districts of Himachal
Pradesh and Punjab. The firm gets contract through competitive
bidding process (tender basis) and hires the truck from the
transport companies for the movement of food grains.


HANWANT FASTNERS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Hanwant
Fastners Private Limited (HFPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank        5.41      CARE B-; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 12, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of HFPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
HFPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. HFPL continues to be
noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 28, 2021, September 7, 2021 and September 17, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Hanwant Fastners Private Limited (HFPL) was incorporated in
September 1994 and started its commercial operations in March 1995.
The company is currently being managed by Mr. Mahavir Singh and Mr.
Hari Singh. The company is engaged in manufacturing of fasteners
mainly bolts. The product of the company finds its application
mainly in the automobile industry. The company has its
manufacturing facility located at Rohtak, Haryana. The company
procures raw materials consisting majorly of bright bars, mild
steel wires and high tensile wires directly from the manufacturers
in the domestic market mainly from Punjab, Haryana and Delhi. The
final products are sold to the manufacturers of auto-parts (mostly
vendors of automobile companies) in the domestic market. The
company manufactures the products as per Deutsches Institut für
Normung (DIN) standards in addition to customized fasteners as per
specific design and requirements and has ISO 9001-2000 for quality
certifications.


HIM CYLINDERS: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Him
Cylinders Limited (HCL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       18.00      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 1, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of HCL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as HCL
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. HCL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 17, 2021, August 27, 2021, September 6, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

HCL, incorporated on August 19, 1983 as a private limited company,
belongs to the Him Group of Companies of New Delhi and is engaged
in manufacturing of LPG Cylinders. Subsequently, it was converted
into a public limited company in July 1999. The manufacturing
facility of the company is located in Una district of Himachal
Pradesh having an installed capacity to manufacture 15.56 lakh
cylinders per annum. The company manufactures the products
according to the client's specifications and sells its entire
output to the public sector oil marketing companies (OMC).


IL&FS LTD: Resolves INR52,200cr Debt as of End of October
---------------------------------------------------------
Livemint.com reports that Infrastructure Leasing and Financial
Services (IL&FS) on Nov. 2 said that the group has resolved
INR52,200 crore of debt by October end and will address the
remaining INR4800 crore through the course of the year to achieve
the repayment target of INR61,000 crore by fiscal end, chairman
Uday Kotak said.

Livemint.com relates that the company is currently sitting on a
cash balance of INR16,700 crore as of end-October, when it
completed the third year of its bankruptcy. The company has repaid
INR14,100 crore of debt this fiscal so far.  

The resolution of INR52,200 crore represents 86% of the overall
estimated resolution value of INR61,000 crore and 53% of the total
debt, which stands at INR99,000 crore.  

"There are currently INR21,000 crore of debt in NCLT. The court has
already approved 13,2000 crore of INR21,000 cr. We will now start
the process of documentation. INR8000 cr of debt in still pending
in NCLT. Therefore we believe we are on track to reach INR57,000
core by March," said the management.

Of the 347 entities under IL&FS Group as of October 2018, a total
of 235 entities stand resolved till date, including resolution
applications filed with courts, and applications for additional 15
entities are expected to be filed with courts by March 2022, he
said.  

The group estimates resolution of the remaining nearly INR4,000
crore debt across 97 entities to move into the next fiscal,
Livemint.com notes.

Since July 2021, the Group has resolved additional debt of INR8,500
crore from monetisation initiatives including: InvIT Phase 1,
Terracis Technology (erstwhile IL&FS Technologies), ONGC Tripura
Gas based power project, Warora Chandrapur Road project and IL&FS
Prime Terminals Fujaira, according to the report.

Additionally, it has also submitted an application with the NCLT
seeking approval for transfer of five road projects, with a
resolution value of around INR4,000 crore, under phase 2 of the
InvIT monetisation and has launched sale process of IFIN's external
bad loan portfolio of around INR4,300 crore under the Swiss
challenge method, Livemint.com relays.

                            About IL&FS

Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited (IL&FS) --
https://www.ilfsindia.com/ -- is an infrastructure development and
finance company based in India. It focuses on the development and
commercialization of infrastructure projects, and creation of value
added financial services. The company operates in Financial
Services, Infrastructure Services, and Others segments.

The Indian government, in October 2018, stepped in to take control
of crisis-ridden IL&FS by moving the National Company Law Tribunal
(NCLT) to supersede and reconstitute the board of the firm which
has defaulted on a series of its debt payments, according to Indian
Express. This was said to be an attempt to restore the confidence
of financial markets in the credibility and solvency of the
infrastructure financing and development group.


INDIGO COLLECTIONS: CARE Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Indigo
Collections Private Limited (ICPL) continues to remain in the
'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank        4.50      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

   Short Term Bank       5.50      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 5, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of ICPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
ICPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. ICPL continues to be
noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 21, 2021, August 31, 2021, September 10, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Detailed description of the key rating drivers

Delhi-based, Indigo Collections Private Limited (ICPL) was
incorporated on February 2, 2005; however started its commercial
operations in April 2008. ICPL is currently being managed by Mrs.
Upma Chandra, Mr. Manish K. Kochar, Mr. Ravinder Singh and Mrs.
Seema Ghai with the help of qualified management. The company is a
manufacturer and exporter of readymade garments for ladies and
children such as tops, blouses, pants, shirts etc. The
manufacturing facility is located in Gurgaon, Haryana. ICPL exports
90% of its production to established brands such as ZARA, RNA
Group, CALAO Imports S.L. etc. based in the USA, UK and UAE. The
company procures the raw material such as fabrics and related
accessories like buttons, threads, labels, zippers etc. from
manufactures and traders located in the domestic and overseas
market.


JAI SAKTHI: CARE Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Jai Sakthi
Mills (JSM) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       35.62      CARE B; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 21, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of JSM under the 'issuer noncooperating' category as JSM
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. JSM continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
September 06, 2021, September 16, 2021 and September 26, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

JSM is a partnership concern established in April 2010, for
production of yarn and cloth in Sulur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. JSM
has 10 partners, all belonging to same family. In FY14, the firm
has added 7 more partners from the own family in order to infuse
more capital to support the operations. Although established in
April 2010, JSM commenced its commercial production of yarn and
cloth from June 2012. The installed capacity of the firm as on
March 31, 2015, is 18,000 spindles. The firm has 15 ring-frames
with 1200 spindles. The entire cloth manufacturing is completely
outsourced to other units wherein the yarn is supplied by JSM. JSM
produces yarn varieties in the count of 25s, 30s and 34s
semi-combed hosiery yarn, which are used in making cloth which is
finally used in the making of men's vests and T-Shirts.

KAIZEN AUTOCARS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Kaizen
Autocars Private Limited (KAPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       9.57       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 27, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of KAPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
KAPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. KAPL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
September 12, 2021, September 22, 2021, October 2, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

KAPL was incorporated in the year 2013 and is an authorized dealer
for the four wheelers of Honda. The company has two showrooms
located in Solapur and Latur.

KALOSONA HIMGHAR: CARE Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Kalosona
Himghar Udyog Private Limited (KHUPL) continues to remain in the
'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       6.20       CARE B; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 14, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of KHUPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
KHUPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. KHUPL continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 30, 2021, September 9, 2021, September 19, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Kalosona Himghar Udyog Private Limited. (KHUPL), incorporated in
the year 2004, is a Arambagh (West Bengal) based company, promoted
by Mr. Priyo Mohan Dey and Mr. Mukti Podho Kundu. It is engaged in
the business of providing cold storage services to potato growing
farmers and potato traders, having an installed storage capacity of
170,000 quintals in Hooghly district of West Bengal. Mr. Mukti
Padho Kundu and Mr. Priyo Mohan Dey, both having experience of more
than three decades, look after overall management of the company.
Both directors are supported by other two directors and a team of
experienced professionals who have rich experience in the same line
of business.


KARLA CONSTRUCTIONS: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Karla
Constructions (KC) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank        7.00      CARE C; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

   Short Term Bank       5.00      CARE A4; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 27, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of KC under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as KC
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. KC continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
September 12, 2021, September 22, 2021 and October 2, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Karla Constructions (KC), based out of Udupi, Karnataka is a sole
proprietorship firm established in 1972. KC is engaged in executing
civil construction contracts such as construction of National
Highways and roads for government organizations. The firm's
operations are managed by its promoter, Mr. Shivaram Shetty. The
firm is a class I govt. contractor registered with public works
department (PWD).

LODHI RAJPOOT: CARE Lowers Rating on INR6.05cr LT Loan to B
-----------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of
Lodhi Rajpoot Ice And Cold Storage Private Limited (LRICS), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       6.05       CARE B; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category and
                                   Revised from CARE B+; Stable

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 5, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of LRICS under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
LRICS had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. LRICS continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 21, 2021, August 31, 2021 and September 10, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

The ratings have been revised on account of non-availability of
requisite information.

Uttar Pradesh-based Lodhi Rajpoot Ice and Cold Storage Private
Limited (LRICS) was incorporated in June 1996 as a private limited
company. The company is currently managed by Mr. Mohan Datt & Mr.
Ram Gopal. The company is engaged in renting of its cold storage
facility for potatoes to the local farmers in Shikohabad, Uttar
Pradesh with multi chambers having storage capacity of 239942.30
quintals. The company has one group associate namely; "P G Ice and
Cold Storage Private Limited" (incorporated in April 2015); engaged
in same line of business.

LORDS TRAVELS: CARE Lowers Rating on INR5.00cr LT Loan to B+
------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of
Lords Travels Private Limited (LTPL), as:
                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       5.00       CARE B+; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category and
                                   Revised from CARE BB-; Stable

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 15, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of LTPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
LTPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. LTPL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 31, 2021, September 10, 2021 and September 20, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

The ratings have been revised on account of non-availability of
requisite information. The ratings also consider the company's
small scale of operations as well as a decline in overall
profitability in FY20.

Delhi based, LTPL was incorporated in 1994, and is currently
promoted by Mr. Bhagwant Singh Arora and Ms. Mohinder Kaur Arora.
The company is engaged in providing one stop travel solutions
including Air tickets, Visa assistance, travel insurance, Forex,
Multi currency cards, Hotels, Cruises, International & Domestic
Packages, Car rentals and other allied services. LTPL is an IATA
(International Air Transport Association) approved travel agent.
The company derives its revenue from commission on air ticketing
and hotel booking. LTPL currently operates in the B2B business and
has around 250 subdealers across India.


M & T CONSTRUCTIONS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of M & T
Constructions (MTC) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       6.00       CARE B-; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 21, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of MTC under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as MTC
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. MTC continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
September 6, 2021, September 16, 2021 and September 26, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

MTC is a partnership firm established in the year 1993 by the
partners Mr Manoj Krishna and Mr Thomas V.T. The profits of the
firm are shared equally between the partners. The firm is
registered as an 'A' class contractor with Public Works Department
(PWD) of State Government of Kerala from the year 2003. MTC
constructs roads and bridges for PWD and Kerala State Construction
Corporation Limited in Kerala which contributes the entire revenue
of the firm.


MA MAHAMAYA: CARE Lowers Rating on INR9.36cr LT Loan to D
---------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of Ma
Mahamaya Rice Mill Private Limited (MMRMPL), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank        9.36      CARE D Revised from CARE B+;  
   Facilities                      Stable

   Short Term Bank
   Facilities            0.45      CARE D Revised from CARE A4

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

The revision in the rating assigned to the bank facilities of
MMRMPL takes into account the ongoing delays in repayments of term
loan (Principal and Interest) and delays in payment of interest on
cash credit facility for more than 30 days.

Rating Sensitivities

Positive Factors - Factors that could lead to positive rating
action/upgrade:

* Regularization of debt servicing for a continuous period of 3
months

* Company earning sufficient cash accruals so as to meet its debt
repayment obligations

Detailed description of the key rating drivers

Key Rating Weaknesses

* Delay in debt servicing: There has been ongoing delays in
repayments of term loan (Principal and Interest) and delays in
payment of interest on cash credit facility for more than 30 days.

Liquidity: Poor

Poor liquidity marked by lower accruals when compared to repayment
obligations, fully utilized bank limits and modest cash balance.
This could constrain the ability of the company to repay its debt
obligations on a timely basis.

Ma Mahamaya Rice Mill Private Limited was incorporated in July 2006
with an objective to enter into the rice milling and processing
business. The manufacturing unit of the company is located at
Madhyamgram, Dist: Burdwan with an installed capacity of 40000
metric tons per annum. The company sells its finished product under
the brand name of Mahamaya Bhog. The company is procuring raw paddy
from the local farmers and small paddy agents. Mr. Sandip Hazra
(Director) and Mrs. Madhumita Hazra who have around 21 years and 16
years of experiences, respectively, in a similar line of business,
are looking after the day-to-day operation of the company.


MACROTECH DEVELOPERS: Moody's Upgrades CFR to B3, Outlook Positive
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded to B3 from Caa1 the
corporate family rating of Macrotech Developers Limited (MDL) and
the backed senior secured rating of Lodha Developers International
Limited's USD bonds that are guaranteed by MDL.

The outlook on the ratings is positive.

"The upgrade of MDL's ratings to B3 from Caa1 reflects an
improvement in the company's credit profile as a result of debt
reduction measures by the management, as well as a strong recovery
in the company's operating performance both at India and London
following the easing of pandemic-related restrictions," says Sweta
Patodia, a Moody's Analyst.

"The positive outlook reflects our view that MDL's credit profile
could improve further once the company raises additional equity
which strengthens its liquidity, as well as refinances over the
next few months its USD-denominated bonds due in March 2023," adds
Patodia.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's estimates that MDL's gross consolidated borrowings,
including debt at London, have reduced to around INR188 billion as
of September 30, 2021 from INR223 billion as of March 31, 2021.
This has been driven largely by proceeds from an initial public
offering (IPO) completed in April 2021 and repayment of a loan by
the promoter in June 2021.

At the same time, MDL's operating performance has recovered
strongly following the easing of pandemic-related restrictions. The
company achieved operating sales of INR20 billion for the second
quarter ended September 30,  2021 (2Q FY2022), at its Indian
operations, compared with INR10 billion in the immediately
preceding quarter.

The recovery in operating sales was despite the second quarter
being seasonally weak because of the monsoon season in India, when
construction activity slows down.

The improving pace of vaccinations and a ramp-up in economic
activity have improved consumer sentiment in India. At the same
time, the pandemic has resulted in structural changes in consumer
preferences for bigger homes. Moody's expects that these factors,
combined, will keep operating sales strong over the next 12-18
months.

Moody's estimates MDL's operating sales will be around INR80
billion at its Indian operations for the fiscal year ending March
31, 2022 (FY2022).

Operating performance at London has also improved following UK's
re-opening. In September 2021, MDL achieved operating sales of
GBP110 million at Grosvenor Square (GSQ), one of its projects in
London.

Moody's expects that sales momentum at GSQ will remain buoyant
given the gradual resumption in international travel and re-opening
of UK's borders for international tourists.

MDL will use proceeds from sales of up to December 2021 to
partially repay the existing inventory finance at GSQ. The company
plans to enter a new inventory finance facility to be secured
against the unsold inventory at the project, which Moody's
estimates will be around GBP450 million by December 2021.

Proceeds from this inventory facility will be used to settle
outstanding dues under the current facility and refinance the
outstanding bond. This will alleviate refinancing risks relating to
the USD-denominated bonds maturing in March 2023.

Sales performance at Lincoln Square also remains buoyant with GBP61
million of sales in the first half (1H) of fiscal 2022. With just
GBP59 million of unsold inventory, Moody's expects the project to
be fully sold within fiscal 2022.

Moody's also expects that proceeds from existing sales will be used
to repay the existing inventory loan of around GBP33 million. MDL
will likely transfer the surplus proceeds to India after meeting
the interest expense on the USD bond and the loan facility at
London.

In addition, the company plans to raise up to INR40 billion ($533
million) of equity over the next twelve months which will
strengthen the company's liquidity. Board approvals for raising
equity are in place.

In terms of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, MDL
is exposed to the effects of the pandemic on the operating
environment in India. Moody's considers this to be a social risk.

In terms of the governance risk, Moody's expects MDL to remain
exposed to risks from concentrated ownership as the promoter group
continues to hold 88.5% of the company. In addition, the company's
dividend policy might change following its public listing. Payment
of dividends, if substantial, will reduce MDL's free cash flows and
slow down the likely deleveraging.

However, Moody's expects the risk around concentrated ownership to
moderate as the company is planning to raise further equity over
the next twelve months.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's could upgrade the ratings if 1) the company successfully
executes its planned equity offering which improves its liquidity
profile and; 2) refinances its USD bond, such that the company does
not have significant debt maturities over and above its cash
resources, either at India or London, over the next 12-18 months.

Moody's could also revise the outlook to stable if MDL's liquidity
profile fails to improve as expected and its debt maturities over
the next 12-18 months remain at elevated levels.

A sharp decline in MDL's operating performance that reduces the
company's earnings and cash flows and slows the expected pace of
deleveraging, could also constrain its rating.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Homebuilding
And Property Development Industry published in January 2018.

Macrotech Developers Limited is the largest real estate developer
in India by sales of residential apartments. The company is focused
on residential developments in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, with
some projects in nearby Pune. It has also expanded to the London
market with two projects in the city, namely Grosvenor Square and
Lincoln Square. It is listed on the Indian stock exchanges, with
the promoter group, comprising the Lodha family and their
respective investment vehicles, owning around an 88.5% stake in the
company.

NIMBUS MOTORS: CARE Lowers Rating on INR32.50CR LT Loan to C
------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of
Nimbus Motors Private Limited (NMPL), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       32.50      CARE C; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category and
                                   Revised from CARE B-; Stable

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 6, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of NMPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
NMPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. NMPL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 22, 2021, September 1, 2021, September 11, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

The rating has been revised on account of non-availability of
requisite information. The ratings also consider a decline in scale
of operations coupled with net loss reported in FY20 compared to
FY19.

Nimbus Motors Pvt Ltd. (NMPL) is an authorized dealership of
Hyundai Motors India Ltd at Noida, incorporated in April, 1998 by
Mr. Sunil Dewan. Currently, the company operates showroom in Noida
and four workshops selling premium Hyundai cars (Creta, Grand I20
and Verna, Santro, Eon, i10). The company derives revenue from
vehicle sales, servicing, sale of spare parts and sale of oil and
lubricants. The company was incorporated as a Public Ltd company;
however, it was converted into a Private Ltd company on July 6,
2016.


PRAKASH STEELAGE: CARE Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Prakash
Steelage Limited (PSL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      150.00      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

   Short Term Bank      70.00      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated November 13, 2017, placed
the ratings of PSL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
PSL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. PSL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through emails, phone calls and a letter dated
September 1, 2021; September 6, 2021 and September 13, 2021 and
October 19, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Detailed description of the key rating drivers

At the time of last rating on August 03, 2020 the following were
the rating weakness (updated for the information available from
stock exchange):

Key Rating Weakness

* Delay in servicing of debt obligations: There have been delays in
servicing of its debt obligation as per audit qualification
statement of FY21.

PSL, incorporated on May 9, 1991, was converted into a public
limited company on August 12, 1997 and was listed in August 2010.
PSL started its business with trading in the stainless steel (SS)
sheets, coils, plates and scrap. The company now is engaged in the
manufacturing of stainless steel (seamless and welded) pipes and
tubes and trades into stainless steel sheets and coils. The company
products are used in heat exchanger, evaporators, heating elements,
fluid piping, pumps, valves, condensers and in many other
instrumentation equipments. The company exports its products to
several countries, such as USA, UAE, South Africa, European
countries, Canada, Singapore, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Vietnam, etc.


PRAVARA RENEWABLE: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Pravara
Renewable Energy Limited (PREL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      186.08      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 8, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of PREL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
PREL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. PREL continues to be
noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 24, 2021, September 3, 2021, September 13, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

Pravara Renewable Energy Limited (PREL) is a special purpose
vehicle, incorporated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gammon
Infrastructure Projects Limited (GIPL), to implement the 30 MW
bagasse based co-generation power project adjacent to the sugar
mill of Padmashri Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil, Sahakari Sakhar
Karkhana Limited (Karkhana) at Pravaranagar, District Ahmednagar,
Maharashtra on Build Own Operate and Transfer basis (BOOT). The
total project cost (including cost of modernization of the sugar
plant) is Rs. 250.78 crore (revised from Rs. 239.59 crore),
financed through debt of Rs.191.67 crore and equity of Rs. 59.11
crore (i.e. Debt to equity ratio of 3.24). The COD for the project
was achieved in November 2015.


PRITI GEMS: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Priti Gems
Exports Private Limited (PGEPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       55.00      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 13, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of PGEPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
PGEPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. PGEPL continues to
be noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
August 29, 2021, September 8, 2021, September 18, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

Established in 1995, Priti Gems Exports Private Limited (PGEPL-
converted from partnership firm into private limited company in
2010), a group concern of K. Chandrakant & Co. International Pvt.
Ltd., is engaged in the manufacturing of cut & polished dark brown
diamonds ranging from 0.01 carat to 20 carats in round as well as
other shapes like Princess, Oval, Emerald, Marquise, Pears, Heart,
etc. The company has its own manufacturing set-up in Dahisar and
Surat. PGEPL imports rough diamonds from Belgium and supplies
polished diamonds to jewelry manufacturers based in Australia,
Belgium, Germany, Hong Kong, Israel, Japan, Korea, Thailand, UAE,
UK and USA.


R K CHAVAN: CARE Lowers Rating on INR12.37cr LT Loan to C
---------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of R K
Chavan Infrastructure Private Limited (RKCIPL), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      12.37       CARE C; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category and
                                   Revised from CARE B; Stable

   Short Term Bank      2.63       CARE A4; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated October 23, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of RKCIPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
RKCIPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. RKCIPL continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
September 8, 2021, September 18, 2021, September 28, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

The ratings have been revised on account of non-availability of
requisite information. The ratings also consider a delay in debt
servicing of loan instalments (not rated by CARE) as recognized
from publicly available information.

Latur-based (Maharashtra) RKCIPL was incorporated in the year 2011
and was promoted by Mr Raj Kumar Chavan. The company obtains the
orders from the government as well as private players. The company
is engaged in the business of civil construction (primarily roads).
The company gets subcontracts within infrastructure basket it
undertakes the construction of roads, bridges, buildings; etc. and
executes orders for only private players within the state of
Maharashtra.


TATA POWER: S&P Assigns 'BB' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigns 'BB' long-term issuer credit rating on
India-based Tata Power Co. Ltd.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Tata
Power's stable regulated cash flows, prudent growth in its
renewables segment, and ongoing asset divestments will result in
adequate interest-servicing capability over the next 12-18 months.
We also expect Tata Power will appropriately manage its liquidity
via its supportive banking relationships and good access to the
credit market as part of the wider Tata group."

Tata Power's predominantly stable cash flows are underpinned by its
regulated businesses and continuing growth in its renewables
segment. About 80% of the company's EBITDA is generated from its
regulated transmission and distribution businesses, as well as from
the renewables segment.

S&P continues to expect Tata Power's regulated businesses to
provide earnings stability amid the COVID-19 pandemic in India.
Following the recent 51%-stake acquisition of four distribution
companies in Odisha, these regulated assets will account for about
60% of the company's consolidated EBITDA over fiscals 2022 and
2023.

The company also benefits from good scale and diversity across its
various business segments. Tata Power's well-diversified business
operations across regulated businesses (transmission and
distribution) and generation (coal and renewables) provide
diversity to cash flows. S&P believes renewable energy and related
businesses (such as solar engineering, procurement, and
construction businesses) will become Tata Power's growth engine in
the next two to four years, while its regulated businesses provide
stable cash flows. Although Tata Power's business profile has been
weighed down by the loss-making thermal power plant, Coastal
Gujarat Power Ltd. (CGPL) in Mundra, the asset's profitability has
stabilized in recent years. In addition, stable dividend
contributions from its minority stakes in Indonesian coal mines
partially hedge against CGPL's exposure to the price of imported
coal. However, higher coal prices currently will hurt profitability
at CGPL.

S&P said, "We expect Tata Power's financial profile to remain
resilient, driven by the company's commitment to continue to
delever and contributions from new growth segments.We estimate the
company's FFO cash interest coverage to be higher than 2.5x over
fiscals (ending March 31) 2022 and 2023. Given that 60% of the
company's business is regulated and the ability to pass through all
costs, earnings and cash flows from these businesses should remain
stable, notwithstanding challenging conditions due to the COVID-19
pandemic.

"We expect Tata Power to continue to improve its leverage through
its plans to sell noncore assets, which are in various stages. We
also expect the company to exercise prudence in its upcoming growth
plans, and tie up sufficient funding prior to its spending
commitments. Any successful implementation of asset monetizations
or divestments could aid deleveraging and improve liquidity more
quickly."

Tata Power's liquidity remains less than adequate due to its
continued heavy reliance on short-term funding in its capital
structure.The company's dependence on commercial paper (CP) has
increased to Indian rupee (INR) 83 billion at the end of the first
quarter of fiscal 2022 (ended June 30, 2021) from INR39 billion at
the end of fiscal 2021. S&P believes short-term debt maturities
will remain elevated over the next 12-18 months.

S&P said, "Nonetheless, Tata Power's liquidity pressure is
manageable, in our view. We expect the company to benefit from its
strong relationships with lenders and access to the credit market
as part of the wider Tata group. The company has demonstrated good
access to the CP market amid tighter funding conditions, allowing
it to roll over its maturing debt.

"The 'BB' rating benefits from a one-notch uplift from the
stand-alone credit profile (SACP) of 'bb-' because we believe Tata
Power is moderately strategic to the Tata group.We believe Tata
Sons will provide financial support to Tata Power, especially in
times of liquidity stress. In our view, Tata Power's presence in
India's power sector and growth aspirations in renewable energy
will help fuel Tata Sons' strategic investment in infrastructure,
despite the company contributing less than 10% of Tata Sons' EBITDA
on a proportionate consolidated basis."

Tata Sons has demonstrated a record of support to Tata Power in the
event of stress. Tata Sons participated in preferential rights
issues to alleviate Tata Power's liquidity concerns. The Tata group
has also demonstrated continuing support to CGPL when the latter
sustained losses from spikes in coal prices. S&P believes
reputational damage in the event of a default is another key
incentive for Tata Sons to support Tata Power.

S&P said, "In our view, Tata Sons will have a greater influence on
the long-term strategy and financial policies of Tata Power as the
single largest shareholder. An indication of the parent's support
and control is when Tata Sons increased ownership in Tata Power to
46.9% in fiscal 2021 from 33% in fiscal 2019.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Tata Power's
stable regulated cash flows, prudent growth in its renewables
segment, and ongoing asset sales will result in adequate
interest-servicing capability over the next 12-18 months. We
anticipate FFO cash interest coverage to stay above 2.0x over the
period.

"We also expect Tata Power will appropriately manage its liquidity
with supportive banking relationships and good access to the credit
market as part of the wider Tata group.

"We would lower the rating if Tata Power's liquidity shows signs of
deterioration due to elevated short-term debt maturities or delays
in rolling over its maturities because of unexpected weakening in
banking relationships or prolonged poor access to capital markets.

"We would also lower the rating if Tata Power's FFO cash interest
coverage falls sustainably below 2.0x. This could happen if the
company's operating performance significantly deteriorates, or it
embarks on higher debt-funded growth investments than we expect.

"We could also lower the rating if we believe Tata Power's
strategic relevance to the Tata group has declined, for instance if
its status within the group seems less entrenched or if the
ownership of the parent company Tata Sons reduces significantly.

"We would raise the rating if: (1) Tata Power adopts a more prudent
capital structure with less dependence on short-term funding, such
that sources of liquidity would exceed liquidity uses by more than
1.2x on a sustainable basis; and (2) the company maintains FFO cash
interest of more than 2.0x.

"We could also raise the rating on Tata Power if we assess its
relationship with its parent to have strengthened. This could
happen if Tata Power becomes more strategic and integrated with the
Tata group, such that it contributes a larger portion of the
consolidated group's earnings and continues to carry out the
group's key policy objectives."




=========
J A P A N
=========

JAPAN AIRLINES: Forecasts Full-Year Net Loss of US$1.28 Billion
---------------------------------------------------------------
Japan Airlines on Nov. 2 forecast a net loss of JPY146 billion
($1.28 billion) for the fiscal year ending March 2022, as it
struggles to recover from the coronavirus pandemic.

JAL had refrained making a forecast for the current fiscal year
until now, amid lingering uncertainties related to COVID-19. The
company is now expected to have operating losses for a second
consecutive fiscal year. The airline forecasts JPY766 billion in
consolidated sales for the current fiscal year, up 59% from the
previous year.

For the April-September period, the carrier posted a consolidated
net loss of JPY104.9 billion, as it was hit by weak domestic
passenger demand due to repeated coronavirus states of emergency.
Japan was under an emergency for much of the period, which
encompasses some peak travel periods.

In the face of the global travel slump, JAL revealed that it will
reduce the group's total employees by 2,500 to 33,500 by the end of
fiscal 2023, via a combination of attrition and cutting back on new
hires.

"I feel a great deal of management responsibility," Hideki
Kikuyama, the company's chief financial officer, said during the
earnings conference on Tuesday. Although Kikuyama mentioned that
there had been "signs of a recovery in demand in July," the
expanded state of emergency made the situation worse after that. "I
have a responsibility to recover the business performance as soon
as possible."

JAL said earnings before interest and tax should see profitability
return in the January-March quarter, assuming domestic demand
recovers to 90% of pre-pandemic levels during that period. The
group is aiming to be profitable in the year ending March 2023.

Japan's top airline, ANA, is also expected to have operating losses
for a second consecutive fiscal year. On Friday, the group revised
down its previously announced forecast of a net profit of JPY3.5
billion to a loss of JPY100 billion for the fiscal year ending
March 2022.

As part of its cost-cutting efforts, ANA has unveiled plans to
reduce its workforce by about 20% or 9,000 employees by the end of
fiscal year 2025, including by cutting back on new hires.

Although the aviation industry is starting to see signs of recovery
amid falling new infection cases in Japan, a full-fledged recovery
is coming more slowly than expected.

                        About Japan Airlines

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. engages in scheduled and non-scheduled air
transport, aerial work, and aircraft maintenance services. It
operates through the Air Transport and Others segments. The Air
Transport segment engages in air transport business, airport
passenger service, ground handling service, maintenance service,
cargo service, passenger transport service and airport area
business. The Others segment includes travel planning and sales.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific in
February 2021, Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on Feb. 16, 2021
downgraded the foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured
ratings on debt issued by Japan Airlines Co Ltd. to BB from BB+.



===============
M A L A Y S I A
===============

SERBA DINAMIK: Fitch Lowers LT IDR to 'CCC-'
--------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded Malaysia-based energy-service provider
Serba Dinamik Holdings Berhad's (SDHB) Long-Term Issuer Default
Rating to 'CCC-' from 'B-'. Fitch has also downgraded the senior
unsecured sukuk due May 2022 and March 2025 to 'CCC-', from 'B-'
with a Recovery Rating of 'RR4'. All the ratings were removed from
Rating Watch Negative (RWN), which was placed on 3 June 2021.

The downgrade reflects SDHB's diminished cash reserves, stretched
liquidity and heightened refinancing risk on short-term debt with
MYR100 million in commercial paper and USD222 million in sukuk,
both due in May 2022. SDHB's access to debt funding will continue
to face challenges given the previous auditor requested an
independent review - compounded by delays in the release of its
audited financial statements. The review is ongoing, and it is
unclear when it will be finalised and, pending its satisfactory
completion, SDHB has limited time to address its impending
maturities.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Refinancing Risks, Diminished Cash: Fitch believes there is
sufficient cash for the MYR99 million amortisation payment on a
syndicated loan in December 2021 but liquidity will then weaken
materially. Two other key loans due in May 2022 are the MYR100
million in commercial paper and the USD222 million in sukuk. Cash
reserves had declined to MYR497 million by end-June 2021 from MYR1
billion at end-March.

Fitch also forecasts free cash flow to be negative for next three
years because of SDHB's high working-capital requirements, and
therefore additional funding for its business will further
exacerbate its liquidity position.

High Working Capital: SDHB's working capital remained high as
inventories and plant property and equipment increased again during
2Q21. SDHB has continued to stock up inventories on site to better
carry out its service contracts. This has greatly diminished it
cash reserves.

Receivables were flat in 2Q21 compared with the previous quarter,
indicating that SDHB's customer collections during this period
could be slower than Fitch expected. In contrast, payables
declined, which could hint at supplier pressure for shorter payment
periods and concerns with respect to reputation, which could affect
successful bidding on new contracts. SDHB's working-capital needs
will remain high as it relies on increasing working-capital
facilities to smooth operations and bridge the lag between
rendering services and the receipt of cash.

Weak Quarterly Performance: SDHB's business operations remained
weak in 2Q21, hurt by movement restrictions during Covid-19.
Service delivery was affected but costs also remained high as SDHB
could not reduce costs materially, such as mobilising its
contracted labour. The gross profit margin declined to about 11%,
from an average 17%. Fitch estimates 3Q21 performance remained
muted, as its first and third quarters are generally more subdued.
Still, operations should improve as restrictions are lifted and the
business environment recovers.

Delayed financials: SDHB's audited June 2021 financial statements
will be delayed by one month to November 2021, despite a change in
its financial year end from December to June. Any further delays
will create more uncertainty and cloud refinancing prospects.

Audit Review Constrains Funds Access: SDHB's ex-auditor KPMG had
during the 2020 statutory audit, requested an independent firm to
review SDHB to assess the veracity and accuracy of parts of the
business, including several customers and suppliers as well as
receivables and inventories. This review is ongoing and pending its
conclusion, Fitch believes SDHB's access to credit facilities,
especially given delayed audited financial statements, could be
constrained as lenders become more stringent in requirements.

Suspension of Trading Activity: The regulator has suspended trading
of SDHB's shares, and instructed the company to release a status
update on the special independent review. SDHB responded that all
findings were preliminary and inconclusive. The stock trading
remains suspended, thus further dampening lender and investor
confidence.

ESG - Governance: SDHB has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for
Management Strategy and Financial Transparency, due to the delayed
release of its audited financials as well as an ongoing independent
review by E&Y.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

SDHB's 'CCC-' ratings reflect the high refinancing risks
surrounding its ability to pay the amortisation amount on its
syndicated loan in December 2021 (MYR99 million), and extend the
MYR100 million in commercial paper and USD222 million in sukuk due
in May 2022. The timing of the completion of its refinancing is
uncertain.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Bid book to increase by 5% to 10% annually from 2022;

-- New order book win rate of 25% in 2022 -2024;

-- Order book renewal rate of 30% in 2022-2024;

-- EBITDA margin of around 15% to 17% over 2022-2024.

KEY RECOVERY RATING ASSUMPTIONS

The recovery analysis assumes that SDHB would be reorganised as a
going-concern in bankruptcy rather than liquidated.

Fitch has assumed a 10% administrative claim.

The going-concern EBITDA estimate reflects Fitch's view of a
sustainable, post-reorganisation EBITDA level upon which Fitch
bases the enterprise valuation.

Fitch estimates EBITDA at MYR660 million, which considers EBITDA in
2018 to 2019, and factors in queries raised by KPMG over the
earnings quality from certain customers, including inventory and
receivables.

An enterprise value multiple of 4x EBITDA is applied to the
going-concern EBITDA to calculate a post-reorganisation enterprise
value. In determining the multiple, Fitch has taken into
consideration SDHB's customer quality as well as revenue and cash
flow history and outlook, although its high working-capital and
capex requirements will constrain free cash flow generation.

The going-concern enterprise value corresponds to a 'RR4' Recovery
Rating for the senior unsecured notes after adjusting for
administrative claims.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- SDHB putting in place a refinancing plan for its debt
    maturities and rollover or refinance its short-term debt that
    leads to a sustained improvement in liquidity.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- The audit report is delayed beyond November 2021 or the
    special independent review highlights significant findings
    with credit implications; and/or

-- Inability to address upcoming maturities in a timely manner.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Liquidity is Stretched: SDHB had readily available cash of around
MYR497 million as of end-June 2021, against short-term debt
maturities of MYR1.45 billion. Cash levels were at the lowest in
eight quarters.

SDHB indicated that it has about MYR800 million in committed
undrawn lines available. Fitch believes that the ongoing
independent review has hampered SDHB's ability to drawdown on
existing facilities, hence the reduction in cash during 2Q21.
Management has indicated that some banks have instituted more
stringent requirements, such as a two-tier approval process or
higher deposits before lines are released. This situation will
persist, with the audit as well as independent review pending.
Nevertheless, these lines will be accessible when the auditors give
SDHB a clean bill of health.

SDHB can still pay down the MYR99 million amortisation on its
syndicated loan in December 2021, but the cash balance will be
insufficient to redeem MYR100 million of commercial paper and
USD222 million of sukuk, both due in 2022. This is on the
assumption that all revolving credit facilities will be
successfully rolled over at maturity.

ISSUER PROFILE

SDHB is one of Malaysia's leading oil-and-gas service and equipment
companies, ranked fourth by sales in 2019. It has operational
facilities in Malaysia, Indonesia, United Arab Emirates and the UK
.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

SDHB has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Management Strategy due
to an ongoing independent review requested by its auditors, on
certain aspects of its business, including clarity on suppliers,
customers, inventories and account receivables. This has a negative
impact on the credit profile, and is relevant to the ratings in
conjunction with other factors.

SDHB has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Financial Transparency
due to a delay in the publication of its audited financial reports,
which has a negative impact on the credit profile, and is relevant
to the ratings in conjunction with other factors.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.



=====================
N E W   Z E A L A N D
=====================

PROTECTCRETE NZ: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due Dec. 2
-----------------------------------------------------
Creditors of Protectcrete NZ Limited, which is in voluntary
liquidation, are required to file their proofs of debt by Dec. 2,
2021, to be included in the company's dividend distribution.

The company commenced wind-up proceedings on Oct. 28, 2021.

The company's liquidator is:

         Kevyn Andrew Botes
         I-Business Recovery Limited
         PO Box 302612
         North Harbour, Auckland
         New Zealand




=================
S I N G A P O R E
=================

EAGLE HOSPITALITY: Plan Hearing Slated for Mid-December
-------------------------------------------------------
Ameya Karve of Bloomberg News reports that a U.S. bankruptcy court
will conduct a hearing in mid-December to confirm a liquidation
plan filed by Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment Trust and
related Chapter 11 entities.

The entities on Oct. 14, 2021 filed the Chapter 11 plan,
Singapore-listed Eagle Hospitality Trust said in a filing on
Tuesday, October 12, 2021.

They also filed a disclosure statement that helps creditors of the
bankrupt entities to make "a reasonably informed decision" on
whether to vote to accept or reject the plan: filing.

                    About Eagle Hospitality Group

Eagle Hospitality Trust -- https://eagleht.com/ -- is a hospitality
stapled group comprising Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment
Trust ("Eagle H-REIT") and Eagle Hospitality Business Trust. Based
in Singapore, Eagle H-REIT is established with the principal
investment strategy of investing on a long-term basis, in a
diversified portfolio of income-producing real estate which is used
primarily for hospitality and/or hospitality-related purposes, as
well as real estate-related assets in connection with the
foregoing, with an initial focus on the United States.

EHT US1, Inc., and 26 affiliates, including 15 LLC entities that
each owns hotels in the U.S., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-10036) on Jan. 18, 2021.

EHT US1, Inc., estimated $500 million to $1 billion in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped PAUL HASTINGS LLP as bankruptcy counsel; FTI
CONSULTING, INC., as restructuring advisor; and MOELIS & COMPANY
LLC, as investment banker. COLE SCHOTZ P.C. is the Delaware
counsel. RAJAH & TANN SINGAPORE LLP is Singapore Law counsel, and
WALKERS is Cayman Law counsel. DONLIN, RECANO & COMPANY, INC., is
the claims agent.


EAGLE HOSPITALITY: Settles With Creditors, Files Bankruptcy Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Gill, writing for Bloomberg Law, reports that hotel owner
Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment Trust and 26 subsidiaries
filed a Chapter 11 plan to liquidate in bankruptcy and pay secured
lenders at least $360 million.

The Plan, was jointly filed by the Debtors, the unsecured creditors
committee, and a pre-bankruptcy secured lender -- a loan syndicate
led by Bank of America NA as its agent.

It follows a deal under which the secured lenders agreed to have
$380.5 million in claims allowed in the bankruptcy and recover a
$360 million minimum, according to plan disclosures.

Jeff Montgomery of Law360 reports that the Debtors aim to complete
voting by Dec. 9, 2021 and secure a confirmation on Dec. 16 or 20,
2021 for a liquidation that will pay about $379.5 million to top
creditors in the 15-hotel bankruptcy.

According to Law360, documents filed late Thursday, Oct. 14, 2021,
show that the property company lenders would see the largest
recovery, at least $360.2 million, under a Plan in the works since
January, when the venture moved most of its 18 hotels into Chapter
11 with more than $500 million in debt.

                    About Eagle Hospitality Group

Eagle Hospitality Trust -- https://eagleht.com/ -- is a hospitality
stapled group comprising Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment
Trust ("Eagle H-REIT") and Eagle Hospitality Business Trust. Based
in Singapore, Eagle H-REIT is established with the principal
investment strategy of investing on a long-term basis, in a
diversified portfolio of income-producing real estate which is used
primarily for hospitality and/or hospitality-related purposes, as
well as real estate-related assets in connection with the
foregoing, with an initial focus on the United States.

EHT US1, Inc., and 26 affiliates, including 15 LLC entities that
each owns hotels in the U.S., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-10036) on Jan. 18, 2021.

EHT US1, Inc., estimated $500 million to $1 billion in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped PAUL HASTINGS LLP as bankruptcy counsel; FTI
CONSULTING, INC., as restructuring advisor; and MOELIS & COMPANY
LLC, as investment banker. COLE SCHOTZ P.C. is the Delaware
counsel. RAJAH & TANN SINGAPORE LLP is Singapore Law counsel, and
WALKERS is Cayman Law counsel. DONLIN, RECANO & COMPANY, INC., is
the claims agent.

EAGLE HOSPITALITY: US Trustee Calls Chapter 11 Docs Convoluted
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Montgomery, writing for Law360, reports that struck by
"confoundingly dense" descriptions of plan and disclosure terms in
chronically murky Eagle Hospitality Group's proposed Chapter 11
documents, the Office of the U.S. Trustee urged a Delaware
bankruptcy court judge to reject their approval, and said the plan
is not ready for voter solicitations.  

The 27-page objection took aim at key plan provisions in a 15-hotel
case that arrived in Chapter 11 in January  2022 under parent EHT
US 1 Inc. after months of disputes over control of the businesses,
unpaid debts and allegations of fraud that stretch across the
country and to Singapore and a real estate investment trust.

The U.S. Trustee says it objects to the motion to seek approval of
the Disclosure Statement and solicit votes on the Liquidating Plan
because:

   (1) the proposed opt out mechanism does not sufficiently
demonstrate  creditors' consent to the broad, third-party,
non-debtor releases;

   (2) as non-consensual third-party releases, the releases at
issue do not pass muster under In re Continental Airlines, 203 F.3d
203 (3d Cir. 2000);

   (3) the exculpation provision in the Plan is overly broad
because it includes non-estate fiduciaries and is not limited to
the proper temporal scope; and

   (4) the Plan's various claim treatment provisions are inadequate
for solicitation because the treatment of allowed claims in certain
classes are convoluted, complex and confoundingly dense.  

                    About Eagle Hospitality Group

Eagle Hospitality Trust -- https://eagleht.com/ -- is a hospitality
stapled group comprising Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment
Trust ("Eagle H-REIT") and Eagle Hospitality Business Trust. Based
in Singapore, Eagle H-REIT is established with the principal
investment strategy of investing on a long-term basis, in a
diversified portfolio of income-producing real estate which is used
primarily for hospitality and/or hospitality-related purposes, as
well as real estate-related assets in connection with the
foregoing, with an initial focus on the United States.

EHT US1, Inc., and 26 affiliates, including 15 LLC entities that
each owns hotels in the U.S., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-10036) on Jan. 18, 2021.

EHT US1, Inc., estimated $500 million to $1 billion in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped PAUL HASTINGS LLP as bankruptcy counsel; FTI
CONSULTING, INC., as restructuring advisor; and MOELIS & COMPANY
LLC, as investment banker. COLE SCHOTZ P.C. is the Delaware
counsel. RAJAH & TANN SINGAPORE LLP is Singapore Law counsel, and
WALKERS is Cayman Law counsel. DONLIN, RECANO & COMPANY, INC., is
the claims agent.


GLOBAL APPAREL: Court to Hear Wind-Up Petition on Nov. 19
---------------------------------------------------------
A petition to wind up the operations of Global Apparel And Textile
Pte Ltd will be heard before the High Court of Singapore on Nov.
19, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.

Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited filed the petition against the
company on Oct. 25, 2021.

The Petitioner's solicitors are:

         Shook Lin & Bok LLP
         1 Robinson Road
         #18-00, AIA Tower
         Singapore 048542


GREENBACK ECOMMERCE: Commences Wind-Up Proceedings
--------------------------------------------------
Members of Greenback Ecommerce Limited, on Oct. 29, 2021, passed a
resolution to voluntarily wind up the company's operations.

The company's liquidator is:

         Iain Andrew Nellies
         c/o Insolvency Management Limited
         PO Box 1058, Dunedin 9054
         New Zealand


MOPU HOLDINGS: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due Nov. 30
----------------------------------------------------
Creditors of Mopu Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which is in
voluntary liquidation, are required to file their proofs of debt by
Nov. 30, 2021, to be included in the company's dividend
distribution.

The company's liquidators are:

         Mr. Ong Woon Pheng
         Mr. Sajjad A. Akhtar
         PKF-CAP Advisory Partners Pte Ltd
         c/o 6 Shenton Way
         #38-01 OUE Downtown 1
         Singapore 068809


STRAITS VENTURA: Court Enters Wind-Up Order
-------------------------------------------
The High Court of Singapore entered an order on Oct. 29, 2021, to
wind up the operations of Straits Ventura Pte. Ltd.

HPC Builders Pte Ltd filed the petition against the company.

The company's liquidators are:

         Leow Quek Shiong
         Gary Loh Weng Fatt
         c/o BDO Advisory Pte Ltd
         600 North Bridge Road
         #23-01 Parkview Square
         Singapore 188778


UOL DEVELOPMENT: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due Nov. 29
------------------------------------------------------
Creditors of UOL Development (Dakota) Pte Ltd, which is in
voluntary liquidation, are required to file their proofs of debt by
Nov. 29, 2021, to be included in the company's dividend
distribution.

The company commenced wind-up proceedings on Oct. 28, 2021.

The company's liquidator is:

         Sim Hang Khiang
         9 Kelantan Lane #06-01
         Singapore 208628



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Joy A. Agravante, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2021.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9482.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding,
electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited
without prior written permission of the publishers.
Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed
to be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

TCR-AP subscription rate is US$775 for 6 months delivered via e-
mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance
thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information, contact
Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.



                *** End of Transmission ***