/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCRAP_Public/210826.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                     A S I A   P A C I F I C

          Thursday, August 26, 2021, Vol. 24, No. 165

                           Headlines



A U S T R A L I A

ABORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 2
APLUSPLUS (SA): First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 2
GOLDEN CENTURY: Goes Into Administration
MATCON FORMWORK: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 3
SACCO PTY: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 3

SIX SEASONS: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 6
TORRENS TRUST 2021-2: S&P Gives Prelim. BB Rating on Class E Notes


B A N G L A D E S H

BANGLADESH: S&P Affirms 'BB-/B' Sovereign Credit Ratings


C H I N A

CHINA EVERGRANDE: Pipe Supplier Sue Over Delayed Payments
FOSUN INT'L: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms 'BB' ICR
GUANGXI LIUZHOU: Fitch Lowers LT IDRs to 'BB-', Outlook Stable
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY: Posts CNY7 Billion loss in Second Quarter


I N D I A

A. KRISHNA: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
AG8 VENTURES: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
AJAY INDIA: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
ALPINE EXPO: CARE Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
AMMANARUL SPINNERS: Insolvency Resolution Process Case Summary

ANJANI COTGIN: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
AVK AUTOMART: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
BAJAJ ALLOYS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES: Ind-Ra Affirms 'D' Long-Term Issuer Rating
BHAVNA GEMS: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating

CHARTERED HOTELS: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
DEOGHAR AGROTECH: Ind-Ra Assigns B+ Issuer Rating, Outlook Stable
G. PARANDHAMAIAH: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
GOPAL CHAKRABORTY: Ind-Ra Keeps 'BB' Loan Rating in Non-Cooperating
GOPIKRISHNA INFRASTRUCTURE: Ind-Ra Affirms BB+ LT Issuer Rating

GUJARAT GINNING: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
GVNS TOLLWAY: Ind-Ra Withdraws 'D' Bank Loan Rating
J K INTERNATIONAL: CARE Lowers Rating on INR7.95cr LT Loan to B+
J.B. COTTON: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
JAIN PRINTS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating

JASHANK IMPEX: Insolvency Resolution Process Case Summary
KASATA HOMETECH: Insolvency Resolution Process Case Summary
KAYTX INDUSTRIES: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
KISHORE INFRASTRUCTURES: Ind-Ra Keeps BB Rating in Non-Cooperating
KOPARGAON AHMEDNAGAR: Ind-Ra Keeps 'D' Rating in Non-Cooperating

KOTKAPURA MUKTSAR: Ind-Ra Keeps 'D' Loan Rating in Non-Cooperating
KRISHA ENTERPRISES: CARE Moves C Debt Rating to Not Cooperating
MAA TARA: CARE Lowers Rating on INR11.25cr LT Loan to B
MANAV INFRASTRUCTURE: Ind-Ra Lowers LT Issuer Rating to 'BB'
MONALISA CERAMICS: CARE Lowers Rating on INR15cr LT Loan to D

NAGAYYA MAKKIMANE: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
NCL GREEN: Ind-Ra Assigns B+ Rating to Non-Convertible Debts
ORAVEL STAYS: Fitch Assigns Final 'B' LT IDRs, Outlook Negative
PENTACLE INFRASTRUCTURES: Insolvency Resolution Case Summary
RADHA POULTRY: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating

RADHA SMELTERS: Ind-Ra Affirms & Withdraws BB+ Issuer Rating
RAJDHANI CRAFTS: CARE Keeps B+/A4 Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
RAKMO PRESS: CARE Lowers Rating on INR6.75cr Loan to B-
RATNAGARBHA AGRO: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
RISHABH BUILDWELL: CARE Cuts Rating on INR5cr LT Loan to B-

SAI SWADHIN: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
SATNAM JEWELLS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
SEYA INDUSTRIES: Insolvency Resolution Process Case Summary
SHUBH RICE: CARE Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
SIDDS JEWELS: CARE Moves C Debt Rating to Not Cooperating

SIWAL INFRACON: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
STAR TRACE: Insolvency Resolution Process Case Summary
SURVIVAL TECHNOLOGIES: Ind-Ra Cuts Long-Term Issuer Rating to 'BB'
WEST INDIA: Ind-Ra Lowers Long-Term Issuer Rating to 'BB'
WHITEFIELDS APPAREL: CARE Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating



J A P A N

EAST JAPAN: Egan-Jones Hikes Senior Unsecured Ratings to BB
TOKYU CORP: Egan-Jones Retains BB- Sr. Unsec. Debt Ratings


M O N G O L I A

TRANSPORT & DEVELOPMENT: Moody's Affirms 'B3' LT Deposit Ratings


S I N G A P O R E

ANZ SINGAPORE: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due on Sept. 25
EUNETWORKS 1: Commences Wind-Up Proceedings
GUIDANCE MARINE: Creditors' Meetings Set for Sept. 6
IX BIOPHARMA: Net Loss Narrows to SGD8.2MM in Year Ended June 30
NO SIGNBOARD: Reports Impairment Loss of More Than SGD478,000

SINOPIPE HOLDINGS: Creditors' Meetings Set for Sept. 8

                           - - - - -


=================
A U S T R A L I A
=================

ABORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of Aboriginal
Construction Specialists Pty Ltd will be held on Sept. 2, 2021, via
virtual meeting technology.

Cameron Shaw and Richard Albarran of Hall Chadwick were appointed
as administrators of Aboriginal Construction on Aug. 23, 2021.


APLUSPLUS (SA): First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 2
--------------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of Aplusplus
(SA) Pty Limited, formerly trading as Rema Windows, will be held on
Sept. 2, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. via virtual meeting technology.

Michael van Dissel of Bernardi Martin was appointed as
administrator of Aplusplus (SA) on Aug. 23, 2021.


GOLDEN CENTURY: Goes Into Administration
----------------------------------------
The Sydney Morning Herald reports that one of Sydney's most iconic
eateries - Golden Century Seafood Restaurant - has gone into
administration with the owners blaming the ongoing impact of
COVID-19 shutdowns and a lease dispute.

Chifley Advisory has been appointed administrator of the
institution in the heart of Sydney's Chinatown and a meeting of
creditors will be held on August 27, SMH discloses.

A notice published by ASIC said the company went into
administration on August 17.

According to the report, administrator Desmond Teng said the
primary reason the restaurant has entered voluntary administration
was due its long-term lease coming to an end on August 31.

"Golden Century owners have exhausted all options to negotiate a
commercial agreement for rent reduction," the report quotes Mr.
Teng as saying.  "And secondly the business hasn't been trading at
full capacity for a long time now [due to COVID-19] and they were
technically making losses."

SMH relates that Mr. Teng said the majority of creditors were staff
members and all entitlements would be paid in full.

"A vote will be held for either a deed of company arrangement or
for the company to go into liquidation, which is unlikely," he
said.

The administrator said it was likely the company would reopen in
some capacity after being restructured and a new lease agreement
negotiated, the report relays.

The late-night Chinatown haunt was opened in 1989 by Eric and Linda
Wong, who moved to Australia from Hong Kong, and has fed everyone
from students to socialites and pop stars to politicians. The
restaurant has long been the scene of backroom political
maneuvering, with the eatery just a few doors down from NSW Labor
headquarters.  The Wongs had previously operated a char siu
barbecue restaurant in Kowloon for 10 years.


MATCON FORMWORK: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 3
---------------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of Matcon
Formwork Pty Ltd will be held on Sept. 3, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. via
virtual meeting technology.

Stephen Dixon of Hamilton Murphy Advisory was appointed as
administrator of Matcon Formwork on Aug. 24, 2021.


SACCO PTY: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 3
---------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of Sacco Pty.
Ltd, trading as Rite Price Distributors, will be held on Sept. 3,
2021, at 10:30 a.m. via virtual meeting technology.

Glenn Thomas O'Kearney of GT Advisory & Consulting was appointed as
administrator of Sacco Pty on Aug. 24, 2021.


SIX SEASONS: First Creditors' Meeting Set for Sept. 6
-----------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of Six Seasons
Resources Pty Ltd, formerly Trading as "SSR Cleaning", "SSR
Labour", and "SSR Security", will be held on Sept. 6, 2021, at
10:00 a.m. via virtual meeting technology.

Mathieu Tribut of GTS Advisory was appointed as administrator of
Six Seasons on Aug. 25, 2021.


TORRENS TRUST 2021-2: S&P Gives Prelim. BB Rating on Class E Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to six classes
of prime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) to be issued
by Perpetual Trustee Co. Ltd. as trustee for TORRENS Series 2021-2
Trust.

The preliminary ratings assigned to the prime floating-rate RMBS
reflect the following factors.

The credit risk of the underlying collateral portfolio and the
credit support provided to each class of notes are commensurate
with the ratings assigned. Credit support is provided by
subordination, lenders' mortgage insurance (LMI), and excess
spread, if any. S&P's assessment of credit risk takes into account
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd.'s (BEN's) underwriting standards and
approval process, which are consistent with industry-wide
practices; BEN's servicing quality; and the support provided by the
LMI policies on 16.3% of the portfolio.

The rated notes can meet timely payment of interest and ultimate
payment of principal under the rating stresses. Key rating factors
are the level of subordination provided, the LMI cover, the
trapping of excess yield in the excess revenue reserve (subject to
conditions), the interest-rate swaps, the liquidity facility, and
the principal draw function. All rating stresses are made on the
basis that the trust does not call the notes at or beyond the
call-option date, and that all rated notes must be fully redeemed
via the principal waterfall mechanism under the transaction
documents.

S&P said, "Our rating also takes into account the counterparty
exposure to BEN as interest-rate swap provider and liquidity
facility provider as well as to National Australia Bank Ltd. (NAB)
as standby fixed-rate swap provider and collections account
provider. The interest-rate swaps will be provided to hedge the
fixed-rate mortgage loans and the floating-rate obligations on the
notes. The transaction documents for the swaps and facilities
include downgrade language consistent with S&P Global Ratings'
counterparty criteria.

"We also have factored into our rating the legal structure of the
trust, which is established as a special-purpose entity and meets
our criteria for insolvency remoteness.

"In 2020, we updated our outlook assumptions for Australian RMBS in
response to changing macroeconomic conditions as a result of the
COVID-19 outbreak. As of June 17, 2021, there are no borrowers with
COVID-19-related hardship arrangements present within the pool."

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  TORRENS Series 2021-2 Trust

  Class A, A$460.000 million: AAA (sf)
  Class AB, A$19.250 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B, A$8.250 million: AA (sf)
  Class C, A$5.750 million: A (sf)
  Class D, A$2.650 million: BBB (sf)
  Class E, A$2.100 million: BB (sf)
  Class F, A$2.000 million: Not rated




===================
B A N G L A D E S H
===================

BANGLADESH: S&P Affirms 'BB-/B' Sovereign Credit Ratings
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB-' long-term and 'B' short-term
sovereign credit ratings on Bangladesh. The outlook remains
stable.

Outlook

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Bangladesh's
solid growth prospects will prevail against the risks associated
with the COVID-19 pandemic over the next 12 months.

Upside scenario

S&P said, "We may raise the ratings if the government materially
improves its fiscal outcomes, including its very low revenue
generation and elevated fiscal deficits. We may also raise the
ratings if we observe that Bangladesh's institutional settings have
markedly improved."

Downside scenario

S&P said, "We may lower the ratings if fiscal and external debt
metrics weaken further. We could also lower the ratings if external
debt and financing metrics worsen materially, such that narrow net
external debt surpasses 50% of current account receipts, and gross
external financing needs exceed 100% of current account receipts
plus usable reserves, on a sustained basis."

Rationale

The ratings on Bangladesh reflect the country's modest per capita
income and diminished fiscal flexibility owing to a combination of
limited revenue-generation capacity and elevated debt-servicing
costs. Evolving administrative and institutional settings represent
additional rating constraints. S&P said, "We weigh these factors
against consistently fast economic growth and a balanced external
position, reflecting substantive engagement with bilateral and
multilateral development partners, large remittances from overseas
Bangladeshi citizens back to the country, and a globally
competitive garment sector. Despite stout near-term challenges, we
expect Bangladesh to continue to achieve higher-than-average
economic growth compared with its peers."

Institutional and economic profile: Recovery in global demand will
support ongoing economic recovery

-- Bangladesh's economic recovery momentum will continue to build
over the next one to two years following a real expansion of 5.5%
in the fiscal year ended June 2021.

-- Bangladesh's severe COVID-19 outbreak may act as a near-term
brake on economic activity, but the impact is unlikely to derail
the nascent recovery.

-- Bangladesh's highly concentrated political landscape may
constrain the effectiveness of institutions and limits checks and
balances on the government.

Bangladesh's economy has been hit by the pandemic following a steep
deceleration in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 (April-June 2020)
when strict lockdown measures were adopted in the early phase of
the outbreak. Domestic restrictions and volatile external
conditions drove a weak expansion of just 1.7% in the country's
critical manufacturing sector, contributing to a multi-year low
real GDP expansion of just 3.5% in fiscal 2020. Over the past year,
the economy has embarked upon a gradual recovery, with a
progressive normalization of external demand conditions helping to
stabilize output and employment in Bangladesh's manufacturing
sector. Trade flows and associated employment in external-oriented
industries, such as garment manufacturing, have improved, with real
GDP growth recovering to 5.5% in fiscal 2021.

Bangladesh's current pandemic wave has produced the country's
highest daily case count to date, although there has been some
easing of case numbers over recent weeks. In an effort to battle
the outbreak, which is likely driven by more contagious variants of
the coronavirus, the government implemented strict measures,
including limitations on operations in the manufacturing sector.
Some of these expired in mid-August.

S&P said, "We expect the impact on economic growth to be much more
contained than in the final quarter of fiscal 2020, because recent
measures to counter the spread of the coronavirus are more
calibrated and are generally lifted more quickly if infections
continue to decline. We forecast real GDP growth will climb to 7%
in fiscal 2022 on relatively weak base effects and a continued
normalization of external and domestic demand conditions,
particularly in the second half of the fiscal year.

"Modest per capita income, which we estimate at about US$2,363 for
fiscal 2022, remains one of Bangladesh's main rating constraints.
This level of per capita income limits the fiscal and monetary
flexibility needed to respond to exogenous shocks.

"Balancing these impediments, Bangladesh's weighted average real
per capita GDP growth of about 5.3% over 2015-2024 indicates a
consistently strong growth performance. We assess its economic
growth as being much stronger than sovereigns at a similar level of
income, which is supportive of our credit ratings on Bangladesh.

"The economy has proven its resilience through a variety of
political and financial crises over the past two decades, and we
expect its strong trend growth performance to remain largely
intact." The country's garment industry remains highly competitive
on a global basis, with low unit labor costs and ample supply of
labor. Demographics continue to favor Bangladesh, and the
government is working on strengthening access to key external
markets ahead of its expected graduation from least developed
country (LDC) status in 2024, with a potential extension to 2026.

Bangladesh's highly concentrated domestic political conditions may
undermine the predictability of future policy responses. The
confrontational stance between the ruling Awami League and
opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) reflects deep
division between the historically prominent political parties.
Given its evolving institutional settings, infrastructure
deficiencies, high levels of perceived corruption, and uneven
business environment, Bangladesh's foreign direct investment has
remained persistently low.

The political landscape in Bangladesh remains polarized, with
considerable power centered with the ruling Awami League. The
opposition coalition's decision to join parliament has helped to
restore a degree of stability to the fractious environment. That
said, the opposition's representation in parliament remains
extremely small, limiting checks and balances on the government.

Against this backdrop, Bangladesh's economic outcomes nevertheless
have been strong compared with peers and are expected to remain so
in the medium term.

Flexibility and performance profile: Weak revenue base, high cost
of borrowing constrain fiscal metrics

-- Improving external demand conditions will help to offset
cooling remittance growth following record inflows amid the
pandemic.

-- Fiscal revenue remains low despite value-added tax (VAT)
revisions in 2019, limiting consolidation prospects and raising the
government's interest burden.

-- The government's net indebtedness will stabilize as nominal GDP
growth improves.

Bangladesh's fiscal deficit is likely to remain elevated this year
owing to some additional pandemic-related expenditure, along with
the government's modest revenue performance. S&P forecasts the
associated change in net general government debt to average 5.6% of
GDP annually over fiscals 2022-2024.

The Bangladesh government has introduced a variety of measures
aimed at mitigating the impact of the pandemic on individuals and
businesses. These measures include direct cash assistance to
vulnerable segments of society, lending schemes for exporters, and
working capital facilities and interest subsidies for businesses.
However, total direct fiscal outlays were estimated at just US$2.2
billion as of April 2021, or approximately 0.6% of GDP up to that
point.

Despite higher pandemic spending and continued efforts to boost
capital expenditure over recent years, many basic social and
infrastructure needs in Bangladesh remain unmet, implying a higher
potential expenditure burden in the future.

Bangladesh's higher fiscal deficits amid the pandemic have led to a
material rise in net general government debt, which S&P's project
at 34.1% of GDP by the end of fiscal 2022, versus an estimated 28%
in fiscal 2020.

The government continues to fund itself partially through the
issuance of costly national savings certificates (NSCs), with
interest rates well above the market rate. S&P said, "While we
expect the government to eventually shift toward less costly
capital market borrowing over the long term, higher NSC funding in
the midst of the pandemic will prolong this process. Net NSC
issuance accounted for over 16% of total financing in fiscal 2021,
compared with 10% in fiscal 2020. The costly nature of NSC funding
contributes to Bangladesh's elevated interest burden. We forecast
the government's interest payments will account for greater than
20% of revenue through at least 2024."

Bangladesh's narrow revenue base constrains the government's
flexibility to provide fiscal support to the economy during periods
of stress, and to fund important social and capital expenditure
requirements.

The country has only approximately 5 million registered taxpayers
(out of a population of approximately 160 million). General
government revenue was less than 10% of GDP in fiscals 2017 to
2020--among the lowest of rated sovereigns globally. The government
has outlined numerous initiatives to expand the tax base,
culminating most notably with the introduction of new VAT rules in
July 2019.

S&P does not expect significant revenue increases from the
initiatives to expand the tax base relative to the size of the
economy. Additionally, since the onset of the pandemic, the
government has announced various support measures that will have an
impact on medium-term revenue generation. These measures include a
hike to the taxable income threshold for individuals in the fiscal
2022 budget. The tax rate for unlisted companies will reduce to 30%
from 32.5%, and that for listed companies to 22.5% from 25%. These
steps have put downward pressure on an already-weak revenue
profile.

The Bangladesh sovereign faces limited risk of contingent
liabilities from the banking sector. The sector is relatively small
with assets less than 100% of GDP. S&P classifies Bangladesh's
banking sector in group '9' under its Banking Industry Credit Risk
Assessment (with '1' being the highest assessment and '10' being
the lowest).

Although the private sector banks are in better shape, there are
notable risks in the state-owned commercial banks (SOCBs). SOCBs
account for less than 30% of total banking sector assets, and their
nonperforming loans ratio is considerably higher than that of peer
commercial banks.

Bangladesh's credit profile benefits from low external borrowings.
The country has large remittance inflows and an internationally
competitive garment export sector, resulting in a generally modest
current account deficit.

However, Bangladesh faces some risks to its external profile
because of the COVID-19 pandemic and structural trends. The
weakened state of the global labor market, combined with the
unusually high level of remittances recorded in fiscal 2021,
suggests that net inflows may be lower over the next one to two
years. In particular, fiscal 2021 remittances may have been
considerably higher than trend owing to the repatriation of workers
as unemployment rates in overseas markets rose over the course of
the past 18 months. Over time, the gradual recovery in overseas
labor markets is likely to be supportive of further growth in
remittances, but net inflows will also be lower as a proportion of
GDP.

S&P said, "As the export momentum continues to stabilize and
improve, we anticipate the demand for Bangladeshi exports will
recover further, with momentum likely to improve in the second half
of 2022. While we expect its current account deficit to increase
from fiscal 2021, the relative import compression, especially of
intermediate and capital goods, should keep help to keep it below
2% of GDP. We forecast Bangladesh's current account deficit to
increase this fiscal year to about 1.8% of GDP.

"In our view, despite the increase in the current account deficit
during the forecast period, Bangladesh's external balance sheet and
liquidity will remain supportive of the broader credit profile over
the next one to two years. We expect gross external financing needs
to remain stable at slightly more than 80% of current account
receipts plus usable reserves over 2022-2024."

This however implies that the gap between the country's external
debt and its liquid external assets is unlikely to decline.
Likewise, S&P projects Bangladesh's narrow net external debt to
average approximately 47% of current account receipts throughout
the forecast period. Strong growth in exports in fiscal 2022 will
mitigate the gradual erosion of Bangladesh's external buffer.

Bangladesh's external profile draws substantial donor support,
ensuring that the bulk of public external debt is low-cost
borrowing with long maturity. Additionally, donors and multilateral
lenders have in the past provided some degree of direct budgetary
support, which may carry conditions for policy formulation. Since
the onset of the pandemic, Bangladesh has secured considerable
official creditor financing, including US$732 million in emergency
assistance under the IMF's Rapid Credit Facility and Rapid
Financing Instrument facilities. S&P has also added approximately
US$1.4 billion to Bangladesh's foreign exchange reserves to reflect
the IMF's increased allocation of special drawing rights.

S&P said, "We view Bangladesh's monetary assessment as a neutral
factor to the rating. The central bank's limited independence,
multiple mandates, and underdeveloped capital markets hamper
monetary flexibility. We consider Bangladesh's exchange rate regime
as a crawl-like arrangement, which provides some flexibility to
mitigate external shocks." However, despite gradual depreciation in
the exchange rate since 2015, Bangladesh's real effective exchange
rate (REER) has been rising, reflecting the currency depreciation
of its trading partners.

Should the REER continue to rise, it could strain the
competitiveness of the country's export garment sector.
Bangladesh's central bank has made progress in managing
inflationary expectations. Since 2015, inflation has generally
remained below 6% annually.

In accordance with S&P's relevant policies and procedures, the
Rating Committee was composed of analysts that are qualified to
vote in the committee, with sufficient experience to convey the
appropriate level of knowledge and understanding of the methodology
applicable. At the onset of the committee, the chair confirmed that
the information provided to the Rating Committee by the primary
analyst had been distributed in a timely manner and was sufficient
for Committee members to make an informed decision.

After the primary analyst gave opening remarks and explained the
recommendation, the Committee discussed key rating factors and
critical issues in accordance with the relevant criteria.
Qualitative and quantitative risk factors were considered and
discussed, looking at track-record and forecasts.

The committee's assessment of the key rating factors is reflected
in the Ratings Score Snapshot above.

The chair ensured every voting member was given the opportunity to
articulate his/her opinion. The chair or designee reviewed the
draft report to ensure consistency with the Committee decision. The
views and the decision of the rating committee are summarized in
the above rationale and outlook. The weighting of all rating
factors is described in the methodology used in this rating
action.

  Ratings List

  RATINGS AFFIRMED

  BANGLADESH

  Sovereign Credit Rating    BB-/Stable/B
  Transfer & Convertibility Assessment   
   Local Currency            BB-




=========
C H I N A
=========

CHINA EVERGRANDE: Pipe Supplier Sue Over Delayed Payments
---------------------------------------------------------
South China Morning Post reports that debt-laden developer China
Evergrande Group has failed to pay some overdue bills, piping
supplier Yonggao said, in the latest sign of a cash crunch at the
teetering home builder.

SCMP says financial markets are worried that the size of
Evergrande's debts present a systemic risk were it to fail and the
firm's executives last week were issued a rare warning from
regulators to get their house in order.

Yonggao now joins a handful of suppliers to threaten or launch
legal action over missed or late payments, the report relates.

In an exchange filing, the Shenzhen-listed pipe-producer said it
was owed CNY478 million (US$74 million) in commercial bills, of
which CNY195 million was overdue. It said it could sue the
developer, adding that since May it had stopped deliveries.

Evergrande pledged on Aug. 20 to do everything it can to resolve
its debt issues, but markets appear to remain unconvinced and
nervous, the report notes.

The developer has more than CNY240 billion of bills and trade
payables from contractors to settle over the next 12 months,
according to ratings agency S&P Global, SCMP relays.

                       About China Evergrande

China Evergrande Group is an integrated residential property
developer. The Company, through its subsidiaries, operates in
property development, investment, management, finance, internet,
health, culture, and tourism markets.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific, S&P
Global Ratings, on Aug. 5, 2021, downgraded China Evergrande Group
and its subsidiaries Hengda Real Estate Group Co. Ltd. and Tianji
Holding Ltd. to 'CCC' from 'B-'. S&P also lowered its long-term
issue rating on the U.S. dollar notes issued by Evergrande and
guaranteed by Tianji to 'CCC-' from 'CCC+'. The negative outlook
reflects Evergrande's increasing strained liquidity and nonpayment
risk. It also reflects S&P's view that its asset disposal plan,
though potentially substantial, lacks visibility or certainty.


FOSUN INT'L: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms 'BB' ICR
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised the rating outlook on Fosun
International Ltd. to stable from negative. At the same time, S&P
affirmed its 'BB' long-term issuer credit rating on Fosun and the
'BB' issue rating on the company's guaranteed senior unsecured
debt.

The stable outlook reflects Fosun's stabilizing capital structure
and manageable liquidity, despite significant short-term debt
maturities. The outlook also reflects Fosun's stable or improving
loan-to-value (LTV) ratio given the company's plans to reduce debt
leverage at the holding company level.

S&P said, "We revised the outlook on Fosun following the company's
recent efforts to lengthen its debt maturities through overseas
debt issuances. We also expect Fosun to maintain healthy LTV ratios
given strong price performance for its listed assets and the
company's planned debt reduction at the holding company level."

Fosun's capital structure improvements are likely to be sustainable
given its record of successful issuances. The company's good access
to overseas capital markets should raise its weighted average
maturities to more than two years. Over the past 12 months, Fosun
has issued the equivalent of Chinese renminbi (RMB) 10.9 billion of
overseas debt, with maturities ranging from five to six years. This
led to an improvement of its weighted average maturities to 2.2
years as of June 2021 from 1.8 years in June 2020, despite
persistently high weighting of its domestic short-term debt. The
weighted average maturities for its domestic debt have also
stabilized, though hovering at just over one year.

Fosun's reliance on short-term debt funding weighs on its
liquidity. The company's short-term debt balance of about RMB50
billion as of June 30, 2021, still accounts than 40% of its total
debt (using put dates as maturities for debt with put options). The
high short-term debt balance weighs on its liquidity given a much
smaller cash balance of RMB20 billion during the same period.
However, S&P believes Fosun's marketable securities of about RMB35
billion could be used to meet liquidity requirements, if needed.
The company may be able to roll over its domestic and overseas bank
borrowings--representing about half of its short-term debt--with
relative ease. S&P's view is supported by the Fosun's good banking
relationships, given its significant bank borrowings.

Fosun's debt-reduction plan could sustain a modest reduction in its
LTV ratio. S&P saiod, "We estimate the company's LTV ratio would
fall to about 30% over the next six to 12 months from our
assessment of 32% as of June 30, 2021, and 33.5% as of end-2020."
This assumes Fosun will reduce its debt by about RMB5 billion
through net divestments over the same period. Proceeds from
divestments could moderately improve Fosun's liquidity, if used to
repay short-term debt.

Fosun's improving LTV ratio since December 2020 was largely
supported by the share price appreciation at Shanghai Fosun
Pharmaceutical (Group) Co. Ltd. The unit's share price increased
40% in the first six months of 2021, increasing its weighting
within the Fosun portfolio to about 20% as of June 30, 2021, from
19% as of Dec. 31, 2020, by our estimates.

The stable outlook reflects Fosun's good access to capital markets
and its ability to seek long-term financing both onshore and
overseas. Additionally, the outlook considers S&P's base-case
forecast of Fosun's LTV ratio remaining at about 30%. This is given
the company's plans to reduce debt, which could partially help
offset adverse share price movements for its listed assets.

S&P said, "We may lower the rating if: (1) Fosun is unable to
refinance overseas debt with long-term financing; (2) the company's
liquidity further deteriorates due to more aggressive investment
spending than we anticipate; or (3) its short-term debt increases
materially. In a less likely scenario, we may also lower the rating
if Fosun maintains an LTV ratio above 45%.

"We may raise the rating if Fosun can maintain its LTV ratio below
30% with sufficient buffer for share price movements for its listed
assets as well as improve its weighted average debt maturity to 2.5
years or more. This could happen if Fosun refinances its short-term
domestic debt with longer tenured notes, or significantly reduces
its short-term debt."


GUANGXI LIUZHOU: Fitch Lowers LT IDRs to 'BB-', Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded China-based Guangxi Liuzhou Dongcheng
Investment Development Group Co., Ltd.'s (LDID) Foreign- and
Local-Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) to 'BB-' from 'BB'. The
Outlook is Stable. Fitch has also downgraded the rating on LDID's
USD300 million 7% bonds due 2022 to 'BB-' from 'BB'. The ratings
have been removed from Rating Watch Negative (RWN).

The downgrade comes after Fitch lowered the financial implications
of default to 'Strong' from 'Very Strong' to reflect Fitch's belief
the company's access to the capital market has been reduced in
recent years, which resulted in a lower overall support score.
Fitch has also revised LDID's Standalone Credit Profile (SCP) to
'b-' from 'b' due to increasing leverage.

The ratings were placed on RWN on July 13, 2021 after a portfolio
review of Chinese government-related entities (GRE). The RWN
reflected a potential reassessment of the financial implications of
default attribute under Fitch's Government-Related Entities Rating
Criteria and the company's SCP.

LDID's ratings also reflect the Liuzhou municipality's ownership,
control and support of the company as well as the socio-political
impact on the government if LDID defaults, according to Fitch's GRE
criteria.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

'Strong' Financial Implications of Default: Fitch thinks the
tightening of policies and the deterioration in the company's
access to the capital market in recent years due to Liuzhou
municipality's fiscal weakness may have contributed to a rise in
the cost of funding. Fitch expects these conditions to continue,
potentially weakening LDID's fund-raising capacity in the medium
term.

Fitch believes LDID's financial failure would still have 'Strong'
implications as the company remains the largest GRE in Liuzhou
municipality by assets. A failure by the government to provide
timely support to LDID, leading to a default by the company, could
imply the government is in financial difficulty and hurt its
credibility.

Higher Leverage Lowers SCP: LDID has a 'Weaker' financial profile
due to its increasing leverage. LDID's operating revenue and
profitability in 2020 fell due to the economic slowdown and a
reduction in government land sales. Its weak cash generation led to
high net debt/Fitch-calculated EBITDA of 55x in 2020. Fitch's
rating case forecasts leverage will remain above 50x by 2025 due to
the company's large capex plan. Debt-service coverage - measured by
cash flow from operations/debt repayment and interest payable -
remained below 1x in 2020 with fluctuating cash flow from
operations. Fitch believes LDID will continue to have large capex,
high leverage and poor debt and interest-servicing ability in the
medium term, driven by the infrastructure investments in the area.

Fitch assessed LDID's revenue defensibility at 'Midrange' under
Fitch's Public Sector, Revenue-Supported Entities Rating Criteria
because the company has a fairly diversified business profile with
somewhat limited pricing ability. Fitch considers the operating
risk as 'Midrange' based on its predictable cost structure.

'Very Strong' Status, Ownership and Control: LDID is 100%-owned by
the municipality and registered as a limited liability company
under China's Company Law. The Liuzhou government appoints most of
LDID's board members, senior management and monitoring committee,
and closely monitors the company's financing plans and debt. All
major decisions and projects require the government's approval. The
company is required to report its operational and financial results
to the government regularly. The government sets the audit criteria
and assesses the company's performance annually. The government has
no plan to dilute its shareholding in LDID, according to the
Liuzhou State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration
Commission.

'Strong' Support Record: The municipal government has been
supporting LDID's operations and capex with capital injections,
land cost returns, project funds, subsidies and income returns on
state-owned asset operations. Routine transfers and grants received
in 2020 increased by 15% to CNY262.9 million, including CNY179.3
million received as deferred income with services yet to be
provided. LDID also received share transfers of other GREs in 2020,
which amounted to CNY409 million. Fitch regards LDID as a core
functional GRE in Liuzhou and Fitch expects the legitimate support
offered to LDID to continue in the medium term.

'Moderate' Socio-Political Implications of Default: LDID is the
sole urban developer for the Liudong New District and the city's
biggest urban developer. It has a crucial role in the city's
development and urbanisation as well as the implementation of the
municipality's economic blueprint. Therefore, Fitch expects
substantial government support via administrative or fiscal
measures to ensure the company's continued operational viability.
The government may also appoint other policy GREs to provide
substitute services if necessary.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

LDID's ratings are assessed under Fitch's GRE criteria, reflecting
Liuzhou municipality's strong control over the company and the
support provided. Fitch also factors in the socio-political and
financial implications for the government if LDID were to default.

LDID's SCP is assessed as 'b-' under Fitch's Public Sector,
Revenue-Supported Entities Rating Criteria, while the IDRs are
mainly driven by the four GRE rating factors.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- An upward revision of Fitch's credit view of the Liuzhou
    municipality's ability to provide subsidies, grants or other
    legitimate resources allowed under China's policies and
    regulations;

-- An increased incentive for the Liuzhou municipality to provide
    support to LDID, including stronger socio-political or
    financial implications of default or a stronger support
    record;

-- Improvement in LDID's SCP or liquidity.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- A lowering of Fitch's credit view of the Liuzhou
    municipality's ability to provide subsidies, grants or other
    legitimate resources allowed under China's policies and
    regulations;

-- Significant weakening in the socio-political and financial
    implications of a default, a weaker record of government
    support, or dilution of the government's stake;

-- Rating action on LDID would lead to similar action on the US
    dollar notes.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

ISSUER PROFILE

LDID is the sole urban developer for Liudong New District, which
occupies most of the eastern part of Liuzhou. It is also the city's
manufacturing hub. LDID is mainly responsible for primary land
development, urban infrastructure development, investment and
management and other ancillary services for the area, as well as
state-owned asset operations and management.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY: Posts CNY7 Billion loss in Second Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------------
South China Morning Post reports that Kuaishou Technology, operator
of China's second largest short video-sharing platform, reported
worse-than-expected losses of CNY7.04 billion (US$1.1 billion) in
the second quarter as Beijing continues its regulatory crackdown on
the tech sector.

According to SCMP, the earnings results come at a time when the
company's share price has fallen to one-fifth of its peak in
February amid a broader crash of Chinese tech stocks triggered by
the tighter regulatory environment.

The company reported a net loss of CNY7.04 billion in the second
quarter, missing analysts' consensus estimates compiled by
Bloomberg, which was for a net loss of CNY6.25 billion. The latest
second quarter number compares with a huge CNY37.6 billion net loss
for the same period in 2020, SCMP discloses.

SCMP relates that the Beijing-based company reported revenue of
CNY19.1 billion (US$29.5 billion) last quarter, representing a 48.8
per cent year-on-year increase, beating the CNY18.7 billion market
estimate.

Gross profit increased by 89 per cent to CNY8.4 billion from CNY4.4
billion for the same period last year.

According to the report, the short video platform reported 293
million average daily active users on its main app, up 11.9 per
cent compared with 262 million a year ago.

Earlier this month Kuaishou shut down its overseas app Zynn after
it failed to challenge the dominance of TikTok, SCMP recalls.

Kuaishou Technology operates as a content community and social
platform. The Company helps users create, upload and watch short
videos on mobile devices. Kuaishou Technology offers services
worldwide.




=========
I N D I A
=========

A. KRISHNA: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of A. Krishna
Reddy (AKR) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       3.00       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

   Short Term Bank      3.00       CARE A4; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  
  
Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated August 18, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of AKR under the 'issuer noncooperating' category as AKR
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. AKR continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
July 4, 2021, July 14, 2021, and July 24, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Telangana-based, A. Krishna Reddy (AKR), was established in the
year 2005 as a proprietorship firm with its registered office
located at L.B Nagar, Hyderabad. The promoter of the firm is Mr.
Abbidi Krishna Reddy. He has the experience of more than two
decades in construction industry. The firm is engaged in civil
construction works relating to roads and bridges. The firm procures
its work orders through online tenders from state government of
Telangana.


AG8 VENTURES: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of AG8
Ventures Limited (AVL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      150.40      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 19, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of AVL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as AVL
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. AVL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and email dated May 5,
2021, May 15, 2021, May 25, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Originally incorporated in 1997 as Aakriti Dwellings Pvt. Ltd., AVL
is the flagship company of the Bhopal-based "Aakriti Group". AVL is
engaged in development of multi-storied residential as well as
commercial properties around Bhopal region. In addition to the real
estate sector, "Aakriti Group" has presence in sugar, hospitality
and education industry.


AJAY INDIA: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Ajay India
Limited (AL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       8.90       CARE C; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

   Short Term Bank      0.06       CARE A4; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  
  
Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 23, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of AL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as AL
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. AL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 9, 2021, May 19, 2021, May 29, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

Ajay India Limited (AIL), incorporated in 1996, is promoted by
Kabra family of Bhilwara (Rajasthan) and belongs to Ajay Group of
Industries based out of Bhilwara, Rajasthan. The group is engaged
in the business of manufacturing of finished synthetics fabrics
from polyester yarn since 1987 through group concerns which
includes Ajay Synthetics Private Limited (ASPL, established in
1987), Shubh Fabrics Limited (SFL, established in 1994,) and Ajay
Syntex Ltd (ASL, established in 2006) and into the processing of
grey fabrics through Rolex Processor Private Limited AIL is engaged
in the business of manufacturing of synthetics grey fabrics from
polyester yarn and gets the processing work done on grey fabrics
from other processors on job work basis. The manufacturing facility
of the company is located in Bhilwara, Rajasthan and has total
sulzer looms of 76 looms and 40 airjet looms as on November 30,
2016. The company sells finished synthetic fabrics under the brand
name of 'Wipro' and 'Sparsh'.

ALPINE EXPO: CARE Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Alpine Expo
Tex Private Limited (AETPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      20.00       CARE B; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 19, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of AETPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
AETPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. AETPL continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 5, 2021, May 15, 2021, May 25, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Alpine Expo Tex Private Limited (AETPL), incorporated on March 20,
1995 by Mr. Jagdish P Aggarwal along with his wife Smt. Shakuntla
Aggarwal as a private limited company. AETPL, based out of Okhla
(Delhi) is engaged into trading and supplying of polyester fabric,
chiffon fabric, georgette fabric, satin fabric, cambric fabric and
cotton fabric for all segments of garmenting like menswear, woman
wear or children wear. AETPL is currently managed by Mr. Kapil
Aggarwal and Mr. Prayas Aggarwal, son of Mr. Jagdish P Aggarwal
having two decades of experience in the relevant line of business.


AMMANARUL SPINNERS: Insolvency Resolution Process Case Summary
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Ammanarul Spinners Private Limited
        302, Blue Rose Industrial Premises CHSL
        Off, W.E.H., Nr Petrol Pump
        Borivali (East), Mumbai City
        MH 400066
        IN

Insolvency Commencement Date: August 12, 2021

Court: National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench

Estimated date of closure of
insolvency resolution process: February 8, 2022
                               (180 days from commencement)

Insolvency professional: Vinod Kumar Pukhraj Ambavat

Interim Resolution
Professional:            Vinod Kumar Pukhraj Ambavat
                         Room No. 40
                         9/15 Morarji Velji Bldg, 1st Floor
                         Dr. M.B. Velkar Street
                         Kalbadevi Road
                         Mumbai 400002
                         E-mail: vinod.ambavat@ajallp.com

                            - and -

                         D/511 Kanakia Zillion
                         Junction of LBS Road and CST Road
                         BKC Annexe, Kalina/Kurla (West)
                         Mumbai 400070
                         E-mail: cirp.ammanarulspinners@gmail.com

Last date for
submission of claims:    September 1, 2021


ANJANI COTGIN: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Anjani
Cotgin (AJC) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category.

                      Amount
   Facilities      (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------      -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank     7.02        CARE B-; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Facilities                     Rating continues to remain under

                                  ISSUER NOT COOPERATING category


Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide press release dated July 23, 2020, had placed the
ratings of AJC under the 'Issuer Noncooperating' category as the
firm had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
ratings and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its rating agreement. AJC continues to be
non-cooperative despite requests for submission of information
through phone calls and e-mails dated June 8, 2021, June 18, 2021
and June 28, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

Anjani Cotgin (AJC) was established as a partnership firm in 2003
by Mr. Subhash Goyal along with family members Mrs. Geeta Devi, Mr.
Dipesh Goyal, and Mrs. Vanita Kumari. The firm is primarily engaged
in cotton ginning & pressing, however, also undertakes in house
cotton seed oil extraction and refining. In addition to this, AJC
started manufacturing guar powder and guar meal w.e.f FY13 after
taking over the operations of a group firm, Goyal Guar Gum &
Chemical Industries. AJC has an associate concern, namely, Gautam
Swami Fabric (GSF), established in 2015 as a partnership firm and
engaged in the manufacturing of woven sacks.

AVK AUTOMART: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of AVK
Automart Private Limited (AAPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank        8.44      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 26, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of AAPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
AAPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. AAPL continues to be
noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email
dated May 12, 2021, May 22, 2021, July 23, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

AAPL was set-up in 2010 by Mr. Lalit Kumar and his son, Mr. Puneet
Kumar and is an authorized dealer of Ford India Private Limited in
Mumbai. The company has a showroom located at Powai (Mumbai; 8000
sq. ft.) with two workshops at Chandiwali and Powai.


BAJAJ ALLOYS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Bajaj
Alloys (BA) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      5.00        CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide press release dated July 7, 2020, had placed the
ratings of BA under the 'Issuer Noncooperating' category as the
firm had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
ratings and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its rating agreement. BA continues to be
non-cooperative despite requests for submission of information
through phone calls and e-mails dated May 23, 2021, June 2, 2021
and June 12, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

Incorporated in 2015, Bajaj Alloys (BA) is a Bhiwadi, Rajasthan
based partnership firm promoted by Mr. Manish Bajaj and Mrs. Lalita
Bajaj. The firm is currently being managed by Mr. Manish Bajaj. BA
is engaged in the manufacturing of Aluminum and Copper ingots which
find their application in various industries such as automobile and
other consumer goods. The manufacturing unit of BA is located at
RIICO Industrial Area in Bhiwadi, Rajasthan with installed capacity
of 250 tonnes per month as on March 31, 2018. The company sells its
product to domestic wholesalers and trading houses located Delhi
and Haryana. The raw material required for productions of ingots
are scrap aluminum and copper which is procures locally from
various manufacturing units located in the vicinity (YKK Global,
Daikin, Loyd).


BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES: Ind-Ra Affirms 'D' Long-Term Issuer Rating
----------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has affirmed Ballarpur
Industries Limited's (BILT) Long-Term Issuer Rating at 'IND D'.

The instrument-wise rating actions are:

-- INR840.3 mil. Non-convertible debentures (NCDs; Long-term)ISIN

     INE294A07125 issued on January 28, 2014 coupon rate 11.75%
     due on January 27, 2024 affirmed with IND D rating;

-- INR460 mil. Term loans (Long-term) affirmed with IND D rating;

     and

-- INR2,860.7 bil. Fund-based and non-fund-based working capital
     limits (Long-term/Short-term) affirmed with IND D rating.

Analytical Approach: Ind-Ra continues to take a consolidated view
of BILT and its subsidiaries while arriving at the rating.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The affirmation reflects BILT's continued defaults in debt
servicing since FY17, according to the auditor's report and
announcements on the Bombay Stock Exchange.  

Pursuant to an application filed by one of BILT's lenders, Finquest
Financial Solutions Private Limited, before the National Company
Law Tribunal in terms of Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, the tribunal, on January 17, 2020, ordered the commencement
of the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) for BILT. The
company is undergoing CIRP and is being managed by a resolution
professional. A meeting of the committee of creditors has been
convened on July 22, 2021.

BILT's step-down subsidiary, BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited
('IND D'), is under adjudication for a stay order against the CIRP
initiated by one of its lenders, and the matter is sub-judice in
the Supreme Court.

BILT's Malaysian subsidiary, Sabah Forest Industries Sdn. Bhd, is
under a receivership and the management of Grant Thornton
Consulting Sdn Bhd. On April 4, 2018, the receiver and manager of
Sabah Forest Industries had entered into a sale purchase agreement
with Pelangi Prestasi Sdn Bhd (Pelangi) for a total consideration
of USD310 million. However, the Sabah government changed the terms
for the issuance of new timber licenses, and hence, decided not to
issue a new timber license to Pelangi. Pelangi has filed a civil
suit against the Sabah government for changing the terms on the
issuance of the new timber licenses and the matter is sub-judice.
This has led to further delays in asset monetization.

BILT has not yet reported its audited standalone financial
statements for FY21 and the consolidated financial statements for
FY20. According to the qualified audited financial statements
published by BILT for FY20, the company's standalone operating
revenue fell to INR2,997 million during the year (FY19: INR4,496
million), and its  EBITDA loss widened significantly to INR4,515
million (loss of INR252 million).

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Positive: Timely debt servicing for at least three consecutive
months could result in a positive rating action.

COMPANY PROFILE

BILT, on a consolidated basis, has one production facility in
Malaysia and five production facilities across India, of which
Ballarpur, Bhigwan, and Ashti units are under BILT Graphic Paper
Products, while Kamalapuram and Shree Gopal units are under BILT.
The company has total paper capacity of around 1 million metric
tons and pulp capacity of around 0.8 million metric tons, including
rayon grade pulp capacity.


BHAVNA GEMS: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Bhavna Gems
(BG) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       2.00       CARE C; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

   Long Term/           8.00       CARE C/CARE A4; ISSUER NOT
   Short Term                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
   Bank Facilities                 To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated July 6, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of BG under the 'issuer noncooperating' category as BG
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. BG continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 22, 2021, June 1, 2021, June 11, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

Established in the year 2004, Bhavna Gems (BG) is engaged in
processing and exporting of cut and polished diamonds up to size of
from 0.10 carats to 10.0 carats. BG has its processing plant
located at Surat (Gujarat). BG imports rough diamonds from Belgium
and Dubai. Furthermore, BGs sales are derived from both domestic
and export. It primarily exports to countries namely Hong Kong,
Israel, South Africa and Australia.


CHARTERED HOTELS: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Chartered
Hotels Private limited (CHPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      327.52      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

   Short Term Bank      26.00      CARE A4; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 4, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of CHPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
CHPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. CHPL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
April 20, 2021, April 30, 2021, May 10, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

Chartered Hotels Private Limited (CHPL), incorporated in 1996,
subsidiary of Saraf Hotels Limited (SHL). CHPL and SHL are part of
the Saraf Hotel Enterprises that has over 30 years of experience in
hotel, tourism and travel industry and over 22 years of experience
in Indian hospitality market. CHPL plans to tap the mid-market
segment/full service segment for business by setting up 4 star and
5 star hotels in tier-2 cities – Raipur (4 star), Hampi (4 star),
Lucknow (5 star) & Guwahati (5 star). The company has entered into
a management-cum-marketing agreement with Hyatt International
Corporation for all the 4 hotels.


DEOGHAR AGROTECH: Ind-Ra Assigns B+ Issuer Rating, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has assigned Deoghar Agrotech
Private Limited (DAPL) a Long-Term Issuer Rating of 'IND B+'. The
Outlook is Stable.

The instrument-wise rating actions are:

-- INR120 mil. Term loan due on March 31, 2029 assigned with IND
     B+/Stable rating; and

-- INR50 mil. Fund-based working capital limits assigned with
     IND B+/Stable/IND A4 rating.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The ratings reflect DAPL's limited track record as it commenced
operations only from May 2021. The revenue booked over May-June
2021 was INR105.2 million. The company receives daily orders in
advance. The management expects the scale of operations to remain
small in FY22 with sales of around INR425 million as it is the
first year of DAPL's operations. In FY22, Ind-Ra expects the
operating margins to be modest which is intrinsic to the milling
industry, leading to modest credit metrics.

Liquidity Indicator - Poor: Ind-Ra expects the cash flow from
operations to be negative in FY22, owing to modest profitability.
The management expects the net working capital cycle to be around
60 days in FY22, owing to the inventory to be maintained as it
receives daily orders. The peak average utilization of fund-based
working capital limits was 29.57% during the seven months ended May
2021. The cash and cash equivalents were INR16.86 million at FYE21.
The repayment for FY22 is INR10.31 million. The promoters have
infused equity worth INR30.3 million in FY20 and INR7.6 million in
FY21. DAPL availed a term loan of INR120 million in December 2019
to setup a rice mill in Jasidih town in Deoghar district,
Jharkhand. The term loan will be fully repaid in FY29.

The ratings, however, are supported by the promoter's more than
three decades of experience in the agro-products milling industry.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Negative: An inability to meet the management's operating
performance expectations in FY22, affecting the debt servicing
capability of the company, could be negative for the ratings.

Positive: To achieve stable operating profitability, on a sustained
basis, will be positive for the ratings.

COMPANY PROFILE

Incorporated in 2016, DAPL has setup a rice mill for the
manufacturing of rice from paddy rice and operations commenced from
April 2021. The rice mill is located at Jasidih in Deoghar district
of Jharkhand.


G. PARANDHAMAIAH: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of G.
Parandhamaiah and Company Cotton Ginning Mills (GCCGM) continues to
remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       8.00       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 26, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of GCCGM under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
GCCGM had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. GCCGM continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 12, 2021, May 22, 2021, and July 23, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

G.Parandhamaiah and Company Cotton Ginning Mills (GPCC) was
established in 1973 as a partnership firm and promoted by Gorantla
Punnaiah and his family members. The firm is engaged in
manufacturing of cotton lint and seeds. The manufacturing unit is
spread in total area 11 acres located at Ganapavaram, Guntur
(Andhra Pradesh). GPCCGM purchases raw cotton from farmers located
in and around Guntur. The firm sells the cotton lint and seeds to
the customers within Andhra Pradesh.


GOPAL CHAKRABORTY: Ind-Ra Keeps 'BB' Loan Rating in Non-Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has maintained Gopal
Chakraborty Charitable Trust's (GCCT) bank facilities' rating in
the non-cooperating category and has simultaneously withdrawn the
same.

The detailed rating action is:

-- INR244.35 mil. Bank loans* maintained in non-cooperating
     category and withdrawn.

*Maintained at 'IND BB (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)' before being
withdrawn.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The rating has been maintained in the non-cooperating category as
GCCT did not participate in the rating exercise despite continuous
requests and follow-ups by Ind-Ra.  

Ind-Ra is no longer required to maintain the rating, as it has
received a no-objection certificate from the lender. This is
consistent with the Securities and Exchange Board of India's
circular dated March 31, 2017 for credit rating agencies.

COMPANY PROFILE

GCCT runs the Indus Valley World School, which is spread over
170,000 square feet and offers K-12 education and is affiliated
with the Central Board of Secondary Education. The trust was
established in 2008 in Kolkata and is registered under the Indian
Trust Act, 1882.


GOPIKRISHNA INFRASTRUCTURE: Ind-Ra Affirms BB+ LT Issuer Rating
---------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has affirmed Sri Gopikrishna
Infrastructure Private Limited's (SGIPL) Long-Term Issuer Rating at
'IND BB+' while resolving the Rating Watch Negative (RWN).

The instrument-wise ratings are:

-- Long-Term Issuer Rating affirmed; off RWN with IND BB+/Stable
     rating;

-- INR600 mil. Fund-based limits affirmed; off RWN with IND BB+/
     Stable/IND A4+ rating; and

-- INR6.440 bil. Non-fund-based limits affirmed; off RWN with
     IND BB+/Stable/IND A4+ rating.

The resolution of the RWN follows the company's significant
reduction in net debt to INR890 million by end-1QFY22 (FYE21:
INR1,031 million) owing to the promoters' infusion of INR64 million
in YTDFY22. The company repaid over INR450 million of debt
maturities over March-June 2021 and now has cumulative pending
maturities of less than INR50 million to be repaid over FY22 and
FY23. The ratings were maintained on RWN in March 2021, due to
uncertainty about the company's liquidity position.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Liquidity Indicator- Stretched: SGIPL's maximum monthly utilization
of fund-based facilities averaged 98.7% for the 12 months ended
July 2021 (98.2% over 24 months ending July 2021). The company's
ratings are constrained by persistent low availability of spare
liquidity. The company had unencumbered cash of INR124 million at
FYE21 (FYE20: INR24 million). The company faces cumulative debt
repayments and finance costs of over INR800 million over FY22-FY23
(including more than INR500 million already repaid YTDFY22). Ind-Ra
expects the company to generate enough free cash flow (FCF) over
FY22-FY23 to repay the debt and principal. The company generated
free cash flow before interest expense of INR170 million in FY21
(FY20: negative INR145 million; FY19: INR362 million). The
company's net working capital cycle has been long and volatile,
which creates significant uncertainty with respect to FCF
generation.

The company's net working capital cycle (inventories + receivables
+ other current assets - payables - other current liabilities -
mobilization advances) elongated to 384 days in FY21 (FY20: 148
days) due to an elongation in the receivable cycle. SGIPL's ratings
are constrained by a continued deterioration in its revenue due to
COVID-19 led operational disruptions. The company's revenue and
absolute EBITDA declined to INR2,483 million in FY21 (FY20:
INR6,040 million) and to INR379 million (INR755 million),
respectively. According to provisional financials, the company
reported EBITDA of over INR150 million in 1QFY22 with the margin
exceeding 50% (FY21: 15.3%; FY20: 12.5%), as it executed certain
high-margin projects.

The ratings are also constrained by SGIPL's weak credit metrics.
The net interest coverage (EBITDA/net finance expense) deteriorated
to 1.3x in FY21 (FY20: 2.8x) due to the lower absolute EBITDA and
an increase in the net debt to INR1,031 million (INR939 million).
Unsecured loans from promoters stood at INR213 million at
end-1QFY21. The company had provisioned for INR96 million as bonus
for the promoters in FY20, but the promoters have not withdrawn the
amount thus far. The promoters have told Ind-Ra that they will not
withdraw the bonus or the unsecured loans as long as the interest
coverage ratio remains below 2x. The extent to which the infused
promoter money remains in the company is a key monitorable.      

The ratings are, however, supported by the company's improving
orderbook situation. The orderbook of the company improved to
INR10,142 million at end-1QFY22 (FY21: INR6,322 million). However,
the orderbook includes INR6,355 million worth of orders where the
work commenced recently, creating a medium degree of start-up risk.
Assam, Haryana and J&K accounted for 32%, 22% and 21% of the total
orderbook , at end-1QFY22. The largest order accounts for 31.6% of
the total order book while the top four orders accounted for 84%,
reflecting  the order book's moderate project and geographic
concentration.

The ratings are also supported by the promoters of the company. The
promoters have more than a decade of experience in the industry and
have a strong track record of successful project execution. The
promoters have consistently supported the company and infused funds
as and when required.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Positive: The net interest coverage exceeding 2x on a sustainable
basis and a sustained improvement in the liquidity situation of the
company may result in an upgrade.

Negative: A further deterioration in the liquidity or the net
interest coverage falling below 1.5x, on a sustainable basis, may
result in a downgrade.

COMPANY PROFILE

SGIPL was incorporated in 2007 in Hyderabad. It was earlier a
partnership firm. The company is promoted by K. Gopal Raju. It is
an engineering, procurement, and construction company, involved in
rural electrification and electricity transmission projects. The
company also has a small presence in civil construction work (5% of
the order book at end-December 2020).


GUJARAT GINNING: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Gujarat
Ginning & Oil Industries (GGOI) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       12.00      CARE C; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated July 6, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of GGOI under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
GGOI had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. GGOI continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 22, 2021, June 1, 2021, June 11, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

GGOI was promoted in 1994 as a partnership firm; currently there
are two partners Mr. Maganlal Parvadia having 65% share and Mr.
Chandulal Parvadia having 35% share in the firm. GGOI is involved
in the cotton ginning & pressing and crushing of cotton seed with
main products as cotton bales, cotton seeds and cotton seed oil. It
has an installed capacity of 300 bales per day (annualized capacity
of 90,000 bales as 300 working days) and 50 MT Cotton Oil per day
(annualized capacity of 15000 MT as 300 working days) for cotton
bales as on March 31, 2018 at its sole manufacturing facility
located at Gondal (Gujarat). The firm has two associate concerns
named Gujarat Hy-spin Private Limited and Paras Cotton.


GVNS TOLLWAY: Ind-Ra Withdraws 'D' Bank Loan Rating
---------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has withdrawn GVNS Tollway
Private Limited's bank loan rating as follows:

-- The 'D' rating on the INR360 mil. Senior project bank loans
     (long-term) is withdrawn.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Ind-Ra is no longer required to maintain the rating, as the agency
has received a no-dues certificate from the rated facilities'
lender.

COMPANY PROFILE

GVNS Tollway is a special-purpose vehicle owned by GVR Infra
Projects Limited, which secured a 15-year concession from the
government of Andhra Pradesh to design, finance, build, operate and
transfer a two-lane, 600 meter bridge on the Miryalaguda-Kodada
Andhra Pradesh state highway in February 2009.


J K INTERNATIONAL: CARE Lowers Rating on INR7.95cr LT Loan to B+
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of J K
International-Jalandhar (JKI), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank        7.95      CARE B+; Stable Revised from
   Facilities                      CARE D; Stable outlook assigned

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

The revision in the ratings assigned to the bank facilities of
JKI are on account of regularization of debt servicing on account
of improving operational performance of the company during H1FY22
(refers to period April 1 to June 30) which has resulted in
improvement of the liquidity profile. Furthermore, the firm has
comfortable orders on hand indicating revenue visibility during
FY22 (refers to period April 1 to March 31). The ratings, however,
are tempered on account of small and fluctuating scale of
operations, leveraged capital structure and weak debt coverage
indicators, elongated operating cycle and its presence in highly
competitive nature of industry and partnership nature of
constitution.

The ratings, however, are underpinned by experienced partners
coupled with established long track record of operations and
moderate profitability margins.

Key Rating Sensitivity

Positive Factor:

* Increase in scale of operations with total operating income of
more than INR50 crore and above over the medium term on a
sustainable basis.

* Improvement in the capital structure as marked by overall gearing
ratio of below 1.50x.

* Improvement in debt coverage indicators as marked by interest
coverage and TDGCA above 3x and below 5x respectively.

Negative Factor:

* Decline in scale of operations by more than 20% along with
decline in PBILDT and PAT margins below 7.00% and 0.50%,
respectively, on sustained basis.

* Continued elongation in the operating cycle beyond 100 days.

Detailed description of the key rating drivers

Key Rating Strengths

* Experienced partners and established track record of operations:
JKI was established in 2006 and its day-to-day operations are
looked after by Mr. Bikramjit Singh Kang and Mr. Sarjit Singh Kang
as its partners. The partners have industry experience of around
three decades gained through their association with JKI only. The
partners have adequate acumen about various aspects of business
which is likely to benefit JKI in the long run. Furthermore, the
partners are assisted by a team of well-experienced professionals
in their respective domains.

* Moderate profitability margins: The PBILDT margins of the firm
stood moderate around 10-11% for the last three financial years
(FY19-FY21) wherein the firm reaps benefits of its established
image in the regional market. PBILDT margin of the firm declined
marginally and stood at 10.18% in FY21 (prov.) as against 11.30% in
FY20 owing to increase in operational and administrative costs
incurred during that period. Further, due to increase in interest
expenses and depreciation costs PAT margin also declined and stood
at 0.65% in FY21 (prov.) as against 2.44% in FY20.

Key Rating Weaknesses

* Small scale of operations: JKI's scale of operations stood small
as marked by total operating income of INR25.11 crore and gross
cash accruals of INR1.35 crore respectively, during FY21 (FY refers
to the period April 1 to March 31; based on provisional results) as
against INR30.93 crore and INR2.06 crore respectively, during FY20
on account of lower intake from its existing customers. Further,
the firm's net worth base was relatively small at INR4.05 crore as
on March 31, 2021. The small scale limits the company's financial
flexibility in times of stress and deprives it from scale benefits.
Moreover, the company also suffers on account of lack of economies
of scale. Further, the firm has achieved total operating income of
INR7.52 crore during Q1FY22 (refers to the period from April 1,
2021 to June 30, 2021; based on provisional results).

* Leveraged capital structure and weak debt coverage indicators:
The capital structure of the firm stood leveraged as on the past
three balance sheet dates ending March 31, '19- '21 on account of
high debt levels against the net worth base. Overall gearing
(Including Acceptances/Creditors on LC) ratio stood at 2.83x as on
March 31, 2021 (prov.) showing marginal improvement from 2.97x as
on March 31, 2020 on account of accretion of profits to reserves.
Further, on account of high debt levels, the debt coverage
indicators of the firm stood weak as marked by interest coverage
ratio and total debt to GCA of 2.08x and 8.52x respectively for
FY21 (prov.) as against 2.43x and 5.38x respectively for FY20. The
deterioration was mainly on account of increase in debt levels
consequently resulting into higher interest expenses.

* Elongated operating cycle: The operations of the firm are working
capital intensive as marked by elongated operating cycle of 88 days
for FY21 as against 60 days for FY20. The elongation in operating
cycle is on account of increase in inventory holding period and
collection period. The firm is required to maintain adequate
inventory of raw material and finished goods in order to ensure
smooth production process and to meet demand of customers resulting
in an average inventory holding period of around 42 days for FY21
(PY: 26 days). The firm normally offers credit period of around 2-3
months to its customers resulting in the average collection period
of around 79 days for FY21. The firm receives a credit period of
~30-40 days a month from its suppliers resulting in average
creditor's period of 33 days for FY21. The working capital
borrowings of the firm remained
almost 90% utilized during the past 12 months ending June 2021.

* Highly competitive and fragmented nature of industry: The Indian
glassware industry is characterized by numerous players. There are
large numbers of players both in organized and unorganized sector.
Some of the organized players are Borosil, Shott, etc. Furthermore,
the switching cost for the final consumer is not very high. The
firm has a competitive edge over large number of small players
given the proper distribution channel and proper marketing set up.

* Partnership nature of constitution: JKI constitution as a
partnership firm has the inherent risk of possibility of withdrawal
of the partners' capital at the time of personal contingency and
firm being dissolved upon the death/retirement/insolvency of
partners. Moreover, partnership firms have restricted access to
external borrowing as credit worthiness of partners would be the
key factors affecting credit decision of the lenders.

* Project risk:  The firm is undertaking a capex pertaining to
setting up of new Unit III at Village Dhogri, Jalandhar, Punjab for
manufacturing of aluminum doors and windows. The total cost of
project is estimated at INR2.26 crore (Excluding cost of land owned
by promoters). The same is to be funded through term loan of
INR1.70 crore and remaining through internal accruals and infusion
of funds in the form of partners' capital. As of August 02, 2021,
INR0.34 crore has been incurred towards the project. And the
project is expected to be completed by October 2022. The proposal
for sanction of fresh term loan of INR1.70 crore has been submitted
in the bank and is yet to be sanctioned. Additionally, the firm has
submitted proposal for enhancement in the cash credit limit from
INR5.00 crore to 6.00 crore. As per banker, the facilities will be
sanctioned within a week. Considering the capex, the firm is
projecting total operating income of INR38.00 crore for FY22.

Liquidity analysis: Stretched

The liquidity of the firm is stretched marked by tightly matched
accruals vs repayment. The firm is expected to generate to GCA of
INR2.05 crore as of March 31, 2022 against repayment obligation of
INR2.04 crore in same year. The working capital borrowings of the
firm remained almost 90% utilized during the past 12 months ending
June 2021. The firm has low unencumbered cash and bank balance of
INR0.22 crore as on March 31, 2021. Further, the firm also has low
liquidity ratios as reflected by low current ratio and quick ratio
at 1.14x and 0.74x as of March 31, 2021. The firm had availed
moratorium of 6 months (from March 2020 to August 2020) from bank
in light of COVID-19 pandemic for its debt obligations.

J K International - Jalandhar was established as partnership
concern in 2006. The firm is currently being managed by Mr.
Bikramjit Singh Kang and Mr. Sarjit Singh Kang as its partners. JKI
is engaged in manufacturing of Toughened, laminated, Insulating &
Bullet Proof Glass at its manufacturing facility located in
Jalandhar, Punjab having an installed capacity of 61,15,200 square
ft. per annum as of March 31, 2021. The firm caters to
architectural and automotive glass industry. The firm has one group
concern- JBMS Glasses engaged in the trading of glass.


J.B. COTTON: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of J.B. Cotton
(JBC) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       4.84       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated July 10, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of JBC under the 'issuer noncooperating' category as JBC
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. J continues to be non-
cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of information
through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated May 26, 2021,
June 5, 2021, June 15, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Amreli (Gujarat) based JBC is a partnership firm established in
August, 2013 by its Six partners Mr. Dalsukhbhai Jivrajbhai
Vaghasiya, Mr. Umeshbhai Lakhabhai Kalkani, Mr. Jagdishbhai
Jerambhai Kalkani, Mr. Sanjaybhai Jerambhai Kalkani, Mr.
Bhaveshbhai Jadavbhai Kalkani and Mr. Bhavinbhai Lakhabhai Kalkani.
The firm started its commercial operations from February, 2015. The
firm is engaged into business of cotton ginning, pressing and
cotton seed crushing. The firm has its manufacturing facility
located at Amreli with 24 ginning machines and one pressing machine
with a total input capacity of Metric Tonnes Per Annum 20240 (MTPA)
and two expellers with a crushing capacity of 1980 MTPA as on March
31, 2017.


JAIN PRINTS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Jain Prints
And Packaging (JPP) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       8.00       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated July 7, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of JPP under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as JPP
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. JPP continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 23, 2021, June 2, 2021, June 12, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh-based Jain Prints and Packaging (JPP) is a
proprietorship firm and was established 2002 by Mr. Piyush Jain.
The firm manufactures PVC Rigid Sheets & Rolls, PVC Acetate Boxes,
Blister Packaging Products, Soft PVC Pouches and Printed Fabrics.
The overall operations of the firm are managed by Mr. Piyush Jain.
The manufactured products find its application in packaging of
various products such as cookies tray. Chocolate trays and
injection trays apart from this some of the products such as
printer fabrics and PVC Acetate Boxes find their application in
varied industries.


JASHANK IMPEX: Insolvency Resolution Process Case Summary
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Jashank Impex Private Limited
        Landmark Empire Build-A
        5th Floor, Sh-516 Landmark Corpo
        Saroli Surat, Gujarat 395010

Insolvency Commencement Date: August 2, 2021

Court: National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench

Estimated date of closure of
insolvency resolution process: January 28, 2022
                               (180 days from commencement)

Insolvency professional: Mr. Krishna Gopal Ratanlal Maheshwari

Interim Resolution
Professional:            Mr. Krishna Gopal Ratanlal Maheshwari
                         Primus Insolvency Resolution and
                         Valuation Pvt. Ltd.
                         408, Manish Chambers
                         Sonawala Road
                         Above Kotak Bank
                         Goregaon (E)
                         Mumbai 400063
                         India
                         E-mail: 1kgmaheshwari@gmail.com
                                 cirpjashank@gmail.com

Last date for
submission of claims:    August 20, 2021


KASATA HOMETECH: Insolvency Resolution Process Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Kasata Hometech (India) Private Limited
        Shop No. 5 Casa Blenca Destination Architecture
        Plot No. 45, Sector 11
        CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai
        Maharashtra 400614
        IN

Insolvency Commencement Date: August 11, 2021

Court: National Company Law Tribunal, Delhi Bench

Estimated date of closure of
insolvency resolution process: February 7, 2022

Insolvency professional: Jugraj Singh Bedi

Interim Resolution
Professional:            Jugraj Singh Bedi
                         JSBA House
                         1250 Ground Floor
                         Mukherjee Nagar
                         Delhi 110009
                         E-mail: jb@jsba.in
                                 irp.kasata21@gmail.com

Classes of creditors:    Unsecured Financial Creditors

Insolvency
Professionals
Representative of
Creditors in a class:    Mukesh Verma
                         Flat No. 112, C Wing
                         Manish Rose CHS Building No. 29
                         Manish Nagar Andheri West
                         Mumbai 400053
                         E-mail: ip.mukesh@gmail.com

                         Mukesh Khathuria
                         6B/1105 Sapphire Heights
                         Lokhandwala Township
                         Akurli Road, Kandivali-East
                         Mumbai 400101
                         E-mail: khathuria@hotmail.com

                         C Ramadurai
                         Flat no. 301, Topaz Block
                         Esteem Heritage Apartments
                         Roase Garden Road
                         JP Nagar 5th Phase
                         Bangalore 560078
                         E-mail: crd27220@icai.org

Last date for
submission of claims:    September 1, 2021


KAYTX INDUSTRIES: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Kaytx
Industries Private Limited (KIPL) continues to remain in the
'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       40.00      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

   Shor Term Bank       15.00      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 29, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of KIPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
KIPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. KIPL continues to be
noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 15, 2021, May 25, 2021, June 4, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

KIPL was incorporated in 2005 by Mr. Satish Dutt to undertake
manufacturing and trading of steel structures including channels,
angles, joists, etc. Subsequently, the company was acquired by the
current promoters on April 1, 2011. KIPL is promoted by Mr.
Parshotam Lal Aggarwal and Mr. Salil Aggarwal. The company has an
integrated manufacturing facility and offers manufacturing,
fabrication and galvanization of structured steel products with an
installed capacity of 60000 MT per annum for steel structures,
30000 MT per annum for galvanization plant and 300 MT per day of
fabrication capacity.


KISHORE INFRASTRUCTURES: Ind-Ra Keeps BB Rating in Non-Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has maintained Kishore
Infrastructures Private Limited's Long-Term Issuer Rating of 'IND
BB (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)' in the non-cooperating category and
has simultaneously withdrawn it.

The instrument-wise rating actions are:

-- INR160 mil. Fund-based facilities* maintained in non-
     cooperating category and withdrawn; and

-- INR800 mil. Non-fund-based facilities** maintained in non-
     cooperating category and withdrawn.

*Maintained at 'IND BB (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)'/'IND A4+ (ISSUER
NOT COOPERATING)' before being withdrawn

**Maintained at 'IND A4+ (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)' before being
withdrawn

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Ind-Ra has maintained the ratings in the non-cooperating category
because the issuer did not participate in the rating exercise,
despite requests by the agency and has not provided information
pertaining to the company's full-year financial performance for
FY20, sanctioned bank facilities and utilization, business plan and
projections for the next three years, information on corporate
governance, and management certificate.

Ind-Ra is no longer required to maintain the ratings, as the agency
has received no objection certificates from the lenders. This is
consistent with the Securities and Exchange Board of India's
circular dated March 31, 2017 for credit rating agencies. Ind-Ra
will no longer provide analytical and rating coverage for Kishore
Infrastructures.

COMPANY PROFILE

Incorporated in May 2010, Hyderabad-based Kishore Infrastructures
is engaged in electrical distribution and transmission projects,
which mainly include power transmission, distribution lines and
electrical sub-stations in Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh,
Maharashtra, Jharkhand and Rajasthan.


KOPARGAON AHMEDNAGAR: Ind-Ra Keeps 'D' Rating in Non-Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has maintained Kopargaon
Ahmednagar Tollways Phase 1 Private Limited's senior project term
loan in the non-cooperating category. The issuer did not
participate in the surveillance exercise, despite continuous
requests and follow-ups by the agency. Therefore, investors and
other users are advised to take appropriate caution while using the
rating. The rating will continue to appear as 'IND D (ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING)' on the agency's website.

The detailed rating action is as follows:

-- INR1.560 bil. Senior project bank loan(long-term) maintained
     in non-cooperating category with IND D (ISSUER NOT
     COOPERATING) rating.

Note: ISSUER NOT COOPERATING: The ratings were last reviewed on
August 4, 2017. Ind-Ra is unable to provide an update, as the
agency does not have adequate information to review the ratings.

COMPANY PROFILE

Kopargaon Ahmednagar Tollways Phase 1 is a special purpose vehicle
that was incorporated to implement the expansion of a 42.6km
stretch on the Kopargaon Ahmednagar section of State Highway 10 in
Maharashtra to four lanes from two under a seven-year concession
from the state government.


KOTKAPURA MUKTSAR: Ind-Ra Keeps 'D' Loan Rating in Non-Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has maintained Kotkapura
Muktsar Tollways Private Limited's senior project bank loan rating
in the non-cooperating category. The issuer did not participate in
the surveillance exercise despite continuous requests and
follow-ups by the agency. Therefore, investors and other users are
advised to take appropriate caution while using the rating. The
rating will continue to appear as 'IND D (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)'
on the agency's website.

The detailed rating action is:

-- INR750 mil. Senior project bank loan (Long-term) maintained in

     non-cooperating category with IND D (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)
     rating.

Note: ISSUER NOT COOPERATING: The ratings were last reviewed on
August 4, 2017. Ind-Ra is unable to provide an update, as the
agency does not have adequate information to review the ratings.

COMPANY PROFILE

Kotkapura Muktsar Tollways is a special purpose vehicle promoted by
Supreme Infrastructure BOT Holdings Private Limited (48%), Supreme
Infrastructure India Limited (26%) and SPML Infra Limited (26%). It
has been set up to build, operate and maintain a 30-kilometer
stretch on State Highway 16.


KRISHA ENTERPRISES: CARE Moves C Debt Rating to Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings has migrated the rating on bank facilities of Krisha
Enterprises Private Limited (KEPL) to Issuer Not Cooperating
category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Non Convertible      21.00      CARE C; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Debentures                      Rating moved to ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE has been seeking information from KEPL to monitor the
rating(s) vide e-mail communications/letters dated June 15, 2021,
August 5, 2021 among others and numerous phone calls. However,
despite CARE's repeated requests, the company has not provided the
requisite information for monitoring the ratings. In line with the
extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the rating on the basis
of the best available information which however, in CARE's opinion
is not sufficient to arrive at a fair rating. The rating on Krisha
Enterprises Private Limited's bank facilities will now be denoted
as CARE C; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Detailed description of the key rating drivers

At the time of last rating on June 10, 2021, the following were the
rating strengths and weaknesses.

Key Rating Weaknesses

* Project execution and funding risk: Company is developing 1 tower
in Mumbai. Total 160 commercial units and 7 retail units will be
developed over total saleable area of 296,000 sq. ft. As of March
12, 2020, company has purchased land however the construction is
yet to commence. Therefore, the completion of the construction work
in timely manner needs to be seen. The total cost of the project is
INR241.65 crore and till March 2020, the total expenditure of
INR42.99 crore (18% of the total project cost) was incurred which
was funded through contribution from promoters of INR21.99 crore
and optionally convertible debenture of INR21.00 crore. Moreover,
going forward, for the balance cost of the project amounting to
INR198.66 crore, the company is dependent on promoters' balance
contribution of INR31.90 crore and balance of INR166.76 crore
through customer advances. Therefore, going forward timely
arrangement of the above funds to complete the project without any
cost and time overrun coupled with receiving of the commencement
certificate and occupation certificate would be critical from the
credit perspective.

* Marketing risk: KEPL is expecting an average rate of INR17,087
per sq. ft. which is reasonable considering the prices prevailing
of new projects in the nearby area. The company has not yet sold
any unit and received advances.  Therefore, going forward the
timely monetization from saleable area would be critical which is
highly dependent on the successful sale and customer advances to be
received from the booked units. Thus, any delay in the receipt of
funds from customers, ability to achieve timely sales at envisaged
rates given competition from other players in the surrounding
vicinity will be crucial. However, the marketing risk is mitigated
to a certain extent on account of prime location of the project
undertaken as well as past experience of the promoters to undertake
such projects.

* Cyclical nature of the real estate industry: The real estate in
India is highly fragmented and is capital intensive in nature. The
life cycle of a real estate project is long and the state of the
economy at every point in time, right from land acquisition to
construction to actual delivery, has an impact on the project. This
capital-intensive sector is extremely vulnerable to the economic
cycles. Adverse movement in interest rate affects the real estate
players in both ways by hampering demand as well as increasing the
cost of construction. The expectations of many developers have been
able to hold on to the prices so far. However, given the
considerable inventory levels which direction the price graph goes
remains to be seen.

Liquidity position: Stretched

The liquidity position of the company remained stretched marked by
inadequate accruals vis-a-vis repayment obligations and company is
paying its dues by way of unsecured loans from promoters and
related parties.

Key rating strengths

* Experienced promoters and presence in established group in real
estate industry: Directors Mr. Priyal Patel and Mr. Pratik Patel
have more than a decade of experience in the real estate industry.
Further, the company is part of group Rajesh Lifespaces which has
established presence in the real estate industry over five decades.
Group has developed several projects over 9.1 million sq. ft. of
land in Mumbai over the years.

* Location advantage: KEPL's project is located in Vikhroli,
Mumbai, being well-established location and is well connected
through railways and roadways with proximity to other day-to-day
necessities. Nonetheless, its ability to monetize in timely manner
amidst the cyclical nature of industry and avoid cash flow
mismatches shall be critical from credit perspective.

Krisha Enterprises Private Limited (KEPL) was incorporated in 2010
by Patel family as a private limited company and is currently
managed by directors, Mr. Priyal Patel and Mr. Pratik Patel,
engaged in real estate development.


MAA TARA: CARE Lowers Rating on INR11.25cr LT Loan to B
-------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of Maa
Tara Rice Mills (MTRM), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      11.25       CARE B; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category and
                                   Revised from CARE B+; Stable

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated August 6, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of MTRM under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
MTRM had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. MTRM continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
June 22, 2021, July 2, 2021, July 12, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

The rating has been revised on account of non-availability of
requisite information.

Maa Tara Rice Mills (MTRM) was established as a partnership firm in
January 1997 by the Shaw family. Moreover, the commercial
operations of the firm commenced from April 1997. The firm is
engaged in milling of raw rice, bran and husk. The milling unit of
MTRM is located at Budge Budge, West Bengal with a paddy processing
capacity of 80,000 metric tons per annum (MTPA). MTRM procures
paddy from farmers & local agents across the district of South 24
paraganas and sells its finished products through the wholesalers
and brokers located in West Bengal. MTRM has two associate entities
namely Maa Tara Agro Products and Baba Jatadhari Agro (India)
Private Limited which are engaged in processing of agro
commodities.


MANAV INFRASTRUCTURE: Ind-Ra Lowers LT Issuer Rating to 'BB'
------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has downgraded Manav
Infrastructure Private Limited's (Manav Infrastructure) Long-Term
Issuer Rating to 'IND BB (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)' from 'IND
BBB-(ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)'. The issuer did not participate in
the rating exercise despite continuous requests and follow-ups by
the agency.

The instrument-wise rating actions are:

-- INR4.610 bil. Term loans due on April 2023 downgraded with IND

     BB (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING) rating.

Note: ISSUER NOT COOPERATING: Issuer not cooperating; based on the
best available information

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The downgrade is pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Board of
India's circular SEBI/HO/MIRSD/CRADT/CIR/P/2020/2 dated January 3,
2020. As per the circular, any issuer with an investment-grade
rating remaining non-cooperative with a rating agency for more than
six months should be downgraded to a sub-investment grade rating.
For further details, refer to the agency's website
www.indiaratings.co.in.

The current outstanding rating of 'IND BB (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)'
may not reflect Manav Infrastructure's credit strength as the
company has been non-cooperative with the agency since January 27,
2021. Therefore, investors and other users are advised to take
appropriate caution while using these ratings.

COMPANY PROFILE

Incorporated in 2006, Manav Infrastructure is a real estate
developer in Ahmedabad (Gujarat), where it has constructed over 5.9
million square feet of premium residential and commercial space.
The company is now expanding its presence in locations such as
Rajkot, Vadodara and Mehsana.


MONALISA CERAMICS: CARE Lowers Rating on INR15cr LT Loan to D
-------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of
Monalisa Ceramics India Private Limited (MCIPL), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       15.00      CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category and Revised from
                                   CARE C

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 29, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of MCIPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
MCIPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. MCIPL continues to
be noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 15, 2021, May 25, 2021, June 4, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

The rating assigned to the bank facilities of MCIPL has been
revised on account of delays in debt servicing recognized from
publicly available information i.e. Annual reports of FY20.

Incorporated in September 2010, as a private limited company, by
Mr. Shaikh Mashooq Safi and Mr. Suraj Parekh, Monalisa Ceramics
India Private Limited (MCIPL) is engaged in trading of ceramic
tiles, mainly porcelain flooring tiles under the brand name of
"Monalisa". The company procured around 90% of its material from
domestic market and rest imported from China. MCIPL has its
registered office in Vile Parle (Mumbai), branch office at Delhi
and godown at Bhiwandi and Dadar. Further the company sells its
products all over India via distributors and currently has tie-up
with more than 15 distributors.


NAGAYYA MAKKIMANE: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Nagayya
Makkimane Shetty (NMS) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       5.00       CARE C; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated August 17, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of NMS under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as NMS
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. NMS continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
July 3, 2021, July 13, 2021 and July 23, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Karnataka-based, Nagayya Makkimane Shetty (NMS) was established as
a proprietorship firm in 2005 by Mr. Nagayya Makkimane Shetty. NMS
is engaged in civil construction works like construction and
improvements of roads and drainage works relating to Public Works
Department (PWD), Directorate of Municipal Administration (DMA),
Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (KPCL), City Municipal Council
(CMC), Panchayatiraj Engineering, Department (PRED), and Mangaluru
City Corporation (MCC) etc. in the Karnataka state. The firm
purchases materials like cement, steel, metal and Tar from local
suppliers located in and around Karnataka. NMS procures work orders
through online government tender websites.


NCL GREEN: Ind-Ra Assigns B+ Rating to Non-Convertible Debts
-------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has assigned NCL Green Habitats
Private Limited's non-convertible debentures (NCDs) a final rating
as follows:

-- INR392.19 mil. (reduced from INR500 mil.) NCDs*# assigned with
     IND B+/Stable rating.

*Details in annexure

#The final rating has been assigned after the receipt of the final
documents, including the debenture trustee agreement, by the
agency. The final terms and conditions are in line with the
information already received by Ind-Ra, based on which the
provisional rating was assigned.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The rating reflects the saleability risk associated with NCL
Green's ongoing Hosur plot development project, with a saleable
area of 810,618 square feet (sf) in Tamil Nadu. The construction of
the project commenced in April 2020 and the company has completed
the entire development in August 2021 at a total project cost of
INR731.4 million. The project is awaiting final approvals from the
government, which the management expects to receive by
end-September 2021 as envisaged. As of 20 August 2021, the company
had received advances of INR220 million from the customers. The
average realization of the project's area is INR2,116 per sf; the
management expects to receive INR1,500 million from thee plots
booked by 2022. The vulnerable macro-economic factors which affect
discretionary consumer spending, result in project saleability
risk.

Liquidity Indicator - Poor: As of 20 August 2021, NCL Green had
received advances of about 13% from the Hosur project. However, the
project's sale and realization is crucial for the timely repayment
of NCD coupon. In the past, the promoters have supported the
company to meet its debt obligations as there were no ongoing
projects till FY21.

The rating, however, is supported by the financial support
available from the promoters and group companies as indicated by
fund infusions since 2001 to purchase a land parcel of 192 acres in
Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Tamil Nadu. As of March 2021, the
company had NCDs outstanding of INR392.2 million and
inter-corporate deposits of INR271.1 million, and advances from
promoters of INR180.5 million (March 31, 2020: INR504.2 million).
The NCDs were used to for restructuring these advances (inter group
debt) paid for the purchase of land.

The ratings are also supported by the locational advantage of the
ongoing project with proximity to the Bengaluru city. The project
is located in Hosur, which is 25km from the Bommasandra Industrial
Area in Bengaluru.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Positive: The successful completion of the project with envisaged
cash inflows from the sale, resulting in an improvement in the
liquidity position would be positive for the ratings.

Negative: Any increase in the saleability risk, resulting in high
unsold inventory and a further stress on the liquidity position
would be negative for the ratings.

COMPANY PROFILE

Incorporated in 2001, NCL Green is engaged in the business of
purchase and sale of land and real estate. It is wholly-owned by
NCL Holdings (A&S) Ltd, which also operates in a similar line of
business.


ORAVEL STAYS: Fitch Assigns Final 'B' LT IDRs, Outlook Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned India-based Oravel Stays Private Limited
(OYO) final Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency Issuer Default
Ratings (IDRs) of 'B'. The Outlook is Negative.

Simultaneously, Fitch has assigned a final rating of 'B' with
Recovery Rating of 'RR4' to the USD660 million senior secured term
loan facility due 2026, issued by OYO's fully owned subsidiary,
Oravel Stays Singapore Pte Limited. The issuance is unconditionally
and irrevocably guaranteed by OYO and certain other subsidiaries
within the group. Although the loan is guaranteed to the extent of
121% or up to USD800 million of the outstanding principal, Fitch
considers it full and worthy as it should cover 100% of principal
payments plus all interest accrued up to the point at which all
principal is paid.

The assignment of the final rating follows the receipt of documents
conforming to information already received. The final rating is the
same as the expected rating assigned on 20 May 2021.

OYO's ratings reflect its technology-led platforms, which connect
partner hotels and homes to travellers in its core markets of
India, Europe and south-east Asia. OYO has a short operating
history of about seven years and a weak financial profile
characterised by EBITDA losses. Its business model benefits from
high stickiness with property owners due to revenue-sharing with
them, moderate competitive barriers and minimal capex
requirements.

Liquidity and cash access within the group has improved following
the issuance. OYO used the proceeds to refinance its entire
existing debt and pay related fees.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Falling Covid-19 Infections in India: Fitch believes that
travel-related demand will gradually recover in OYO's key markets,
especially India, where daily Covid-19 infections have ebbed to
around 39,000 on 15 August 2021 from the highs of 400,000 in early
May. Google's mobility indicators have been progressively
improving, which suggest that demand recovery in the hospitality
industry is underway from August 2021. However, a rebound in
Covid-19 cases amid the slower-than-expected vaccination rate in
India and south-east Asia continues to pose risks to the travel
market.

Negative Outlook: OYO's ratings continue to have low headroom given
uncertainty about whether EBITDA can turn positive in the financial
year ending March 2023 (FY23) and a likely large free cash flow
(FCF) deficit in FY22. Delay in demand recovery and further
extension of travel-related restrictions, especially in India, can
lead to larger-than-expected negative FCF. Management is committed
to break even on EBITDA by FY23, and is unlikely to enter non-core
areas and markets or make asset-heavy, debt-funded M&A.

Strong Business Profile: OYO's business profile reflects its
technology-led platforms, which connect over 100,000 hotels and
homes with global travellers. OYO has a strong and established
relationship with property owners, with which it has fixed
revenue-sharing contracts that provide exclusive rights to OYO to
market and price rooms on its platform in its core markets. The
company derived about 70% of its total room revenue on its platform
from repeat customers in India and south-east Asia.

Moderate Entry Barriers; Low Capex: Entry and competition barriers
are moderate, as OYO has solid relationships with low- to mid-tier
property owners and offer comprehensive services to market their
rooms on various distribution channels, including online travel
agents (OTAs), offline channels and OYO's own web and mobile
platforms. OYO's platforms enable property owners to enhance
visibility, build brands, maximise revenue and cut costs, while
offering ease of operation. Switching costs are high as OYO's
services are well integrated with its platforms.

Weak Financial Profile: Fitch expects OYO's EBITDA and free cash
flow (FCF) to break even in FY23 and FY24, respectively, driven by
a gradual demand rebound and significant cost savings. OYO
retreated from non-core markets with the onset of the pandemic to
focus on profitable growth in its core markets and cut about 80% of
its costs. Management expects group EBITDA to break even in FY23
due to cost savings and recovering demand. Its 1QFY22 unaudited
results showed a faster revenue recovery and lower EBITDA deficit
than management's expectations.

Diversified Markets; Strong Growth Prospects: OYO has a
single-digit market share in its core markets in terms of
marketable rooms. Revenue diversity will help the company to
weather cash-flow volatility from risks inherent in the travel
industry. It has strong growth prospects and faces lower
competition as it operates in the low- to mid-tier market where
travellers and property owners are price sensitive.

Fitch forecasts FY22 revenue to grow by 35%-40% as the room count
and occupancy rates recover. The hospitality industry is highly
fragmented in India and other key markets, with the unorganised
sector accounting for 75%-80% of the market, which gives OYO a
large addressable market.

Rating on Standalone Basis: Fitch rates OYO on a standalone basis.
There is no parent-subsidiary linkage between OYO and Softbank
group, which owns 45.88% of the company through its subsidiary, SVF
India Holdings (Cayman) Ltd. Softbank does not exercise control
over the company. SoftBank has supported OYO with equity injections
and by extending a term loan in March 2021, but Fitch does not
factor in future exceptional liquidity support from SoftBank in
Fitch's ratings, given OYO's small size compared with SoftBank's
overall investment portfolio.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

US-based Expedia Group, Inc. (BBB-/Negative) has a significantly
better business profile than OYO, with a larger scale and a much
better market position. Expedia is the second-largest OTA and it
makes over half of its revenue from the merchant model, thus
exposing it to higher working-capital requirements during
downturns. Expedia's financial profile is significantly better than
OYO's, given its solid EBITDA margin of 16%-17%, despite an EBITDA
loss in 2020 due to the impact from the Covid-19 pandemic. The
Negative Outlook on Expedia's rating reflects the uncertain impact
of the pandemic on its credit profile and liquidity. Fitch expects
Expedia's EBITDA to recover in 2021-2022 and its FFO gross leverage
to be 2.5x-3.0x in 2022-2023.

China's Meituan (BBB/Negative) has a stronger business and
financial profile than OYO - given its leading position as an
e-commerce platform for consumer services, wide customer outreach
and merchant base. Compared with OYO, Meituan has more diversified
service offerings, including food delivery, in-store, hotel and
travel, and electronic bikes. Meituan has substantial operating
cash flow from the mature food delivery and in-store business, but
the Negative Outlook reflects uncertainty in the pace of investment
in new initiatives. Meituan's financial profile is stronger than
that of OYO, given its net cash position, strong financial
flexibility and access to the equity market to fund investments.

OYO's credit profile is comparable to Germany-based online
classified information provider Speedster Bidco GmbH (AutoScout24,
B/Negative). AutoScout24 benefits from its focus on the online car
dealer segment, its established platforms in an environment of low
competition, a high level of immunity to new or smaller
challengers, and the trend of dealers moving from offline to online
platforms. Its scale is smaller than OYO's but it enjoys high
EBITDA margin of 43%-44%. The Negative Outlook on AutoScout24's
rating reflects its aggressive capital structure with 2022 forecast
FFO gross leverage of 7.9x.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Net room additions of 84,000 in FY22, 225,000 in FY23 and
    259,000 in FY24;

-- Occupancy (ex-Europe homes) of 24% in FY22, 40% in FY23 and
    46% in FY24;

-- Average room rent (ex-Europe homes) of USD18-19 over FY22
    FY24;

-- Revenue growth of 38% in FY22 and 100% in FY23;

-- Gross margin above 30% during FY22-FY23;

-- EBITDA margin of -9% in FY22, 1% in FY23 and 6% in FY24;

-- Minimal working capital, capex and dividend outflows over
    FY22-FY24;

-- Annual M&A spend of USD20 million-27 million.

Key Recovery Rating Assumptions

-- The recovery analysis assumes that OYO would be reorganised as
    a going concern (GC) in bankruptcy rather than liquidated.

-- Fitch estimates that the post-restructuring EBITDA at about
    USD100 million, a 46% discount to Fitch's FY24 EBITDA
    estimate.

-- An enterprise value (EV) multiple of 5.0x is applied to the GC
    EBITDA to calculate a post-reorganisation EV. The multiple of
    5.0x reflects its business and financial profile, industry
    dynamics, and comparable peer data, using the multiple
    assumption tool under Fitch's Corporates Recovery Ratings and
    Instrument Ratings Criteria.

-- 10% taken off the EV to account for bankruptcy and associated
    costs.

-- The total amount of permitted prior-ranking debt under the
    term loan document is assumed to be fully drawn.

-- Fitch estimates the senior secured term loan to have superior
    recovery. However, the Recovery Rating on the term loan is
    capped at 'RR4' because under Fitch's Country-Specific
    Treatment of Recovery Ratings Criteria, India falls into Group
    D of creditor friendliness, and the Recovery Ratings of
    issuers with assets in this group are subject to a cap of
    'RR4'.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/Stable Outlook:

-- Stronger-than-expected EBITDA growth leading to EBITDA break
    even earlier than Fitch's expectations.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Expansion in other geographies and/or non-core areas delaying
    the EBITDA break-even beyond FY23;

-- Rebound in Covid-19 cases leading to further travel
    restrictions and delays in demand recovery;

-- Higher-than-expected negative FCF compared with Fitch's
    estimates;

-- Liquidity ratio falls below 1.0x

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Improved Liquidity: The liquidity score will improve to 1.9x
following the completion of the secured term loan issuance of
USD660 million. Fitch estimates that OYO's unrestricted cash,
following the term loan closure, will be sufficient to fund
short-term debt and Fitch-forecast negative FCF (including
acquisitions) of USD130 million - 150 million in the next 12
months. Term loan repayment is back-ended with only 1% amortisation
annually in the next four years and the balance to be paid in 2026.
Fitch assesses the group's access to local and international banks
as moderate with only average access to capital markets.

ISSUER PROFILE

OYO is an Indian incorporated technology platform that connects
small businesses and entrepreneurs that own or operate hotels and
homes with travellers in its core markets of India, Europe and
south-east Asia. Softbank Group is the single largest shareholder
in the company.

PENTACLE INFRASTRUCTURES: Insolvency Resolution Case Summary
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Pentacle Infrastructures and Towers Private Limited
        No. 1-10-3/1, BooruguVihar
        Beisde Union Bank of India
        Begumpet, Hyderabad
        TG 500016
        IN

Insolvency Commencement Date: August 5, 2021

Court: National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench

Estimated date of closure of
insolvency resolution process: February 7, 2022
                               (180 days from commencement)

Insolvency professional: Ram Murthy Kommera

Interim Resolution
Professional:            Ram Murthy Kommera
                         Plot No. 143, H.No. 8-19
                         Metro City Mega Townships
                         Bongulooru, Ibrahim Patnam
                         Post & Village: M.P. Patelguda
                         Ranga Reddy District
                         Hyderabad 501510
                         E-mail: rammurthyadvocate@gmail.com

Last date for
submission of claims:    August 26, 2021


RADHA POULTRY: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Radha
Poultry Farm (RPF) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       8.00       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated August 17, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of RPF under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as RPF
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. RPF continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
July 3, 2021, July 13, 2021 and July 23, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Radha poultry Farm (RPF) was established in the year 2015 and
promoted by Mr. Rathnamma (Managing Partner) along with other
family members. The firm is engaged in farming of egg, laying
poultry birds (chickens) and trading of eggs, cull birds and their
Manure The firm have 2 units, for one unit the firm receives only
rent and other unit was utilised for poultry business.. The firm
sells its products like eggs and cull birds to retailers through
own sales personnel and through some dealers located in Assam,
Kerala, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. The firm mainly buys chicks
(small chickens) from Venkateshwara Hatcheries Private Limited. The
firm purchases raw materials for feeding of birds like rice broken,
maize, sun flower oil cake, shell grit, minerals and soya from
local traders.


RADHA SMELTERS: Ind-Ra Affirms & Withdraws BB+ Issuer Rating
------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has affirmed Radha Smelters
Private Limited's (RSPL) Long-Term Issuer Rating at 'IND BB+' and
has simultaneously withdrawn the rating. The Outlook was Stable.

The instrument-wise rating actions are:

-- The 'IND BB+'/Stable/'IND A4+' rating on the INR610 mil. Fund-
     based working capital limit* affirmed and withdrawn;

-- The 'IND A4+' rating on the INR5 mil. Non-fund-based working
     capital limit# affirmed and withdrawn; and

-- The 'IND BB+'/Stable rating on the INR247 mil. Term loan@ due
     on March 2025 affirmed and withdrawn.

*Affirmed at 'IND BB+'/Stable/'IND A4+' before being withdrawn
#Affirmed at 'IND A4+' before being withdrawn
@Affirmed at 'IND BB+'/Stable before being withdrawn

Ind-Ra is no longer required to maintain the ratings, as it has
received a no-objection certificate from the rated facilities'
lender. This is consistent with the Securities and Exchange Board
of India's circular dated March 31, 2017 for credit rating
agencies.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Liquidity Indicator: Stretched: The affirmation reflects RSPL's
continued tight liquidity position owing to its high working
capital requirement. The average maximum utilization of the working
capital limits was  97% over the 12 months ended June 2021. The
cash flow from operations rose to INR244 million in FY21 (FY20:
INR157 million) due to an improvement in EBITDA. The net working
capital cycle elongated to 73 days in FY21 (FY20: 69 days) as the
inventory period stretched to 33 days (23 days). The company has
debt servicing obligations of INR30 million for FY22 and INR40
million in FY23; the agency expects the debt service coverage ratio
to continue to be 1.2x over FY22-FY23. As of March 2021, the
company had undrawn lines of around INR50 million.

The ratings factor in RSPL's comfortable credit metrics because of
healthy EBITDA margins. Ind-Ra expects the credit metrics to remain
strong in FY22 on the back of a likely improvement in the absolute
EBITDA.  The credit metrics improved in FY21 due to the increase in
the absolute EBITDA to INR405 million (FY20: INR157 million). The
interest coverage (operating EBITDA/gross interest expense) was
3.4x in FY21 (FY20: 1.6x) and the net leverage (total adjusted net
debt/operating EBITDA) was 2.8x (5.9x).

The ratings factor in the company's continued medium scale of
operations, as indicated by revenue of INR5,344 million in FY21
(FY20: INR4,884 million). Ind-Ra expects the revenue to grow
slightly in the near-to-medium term due to an increase in the
realizations as well as production, driven by higher demand.
Despite the impact of COVID-19-led disruptions, RSPL's revenue grew
in FY21 due to increased demand coupled with a rise in the capacity
utilization to 0.12 million metric tons (FY20: 0.11 million metric
tons).

The ratings take into consideration the successful completion of
capex of INR100 million, which was funded by bank debt, for setting
up a 133kva electric line for the plant to improve power
efficiency. This would result in power savings of INR3.0
million-3.5 million per month. Also, the company has successfully
implemented the ladle refining furnace technology, which improves
the quality of the thermo-mechanically treated by reducing the
impurity in the same, at its unit in FY21.  

The ratings are supported by the healthy EBITDA margins. Although
the company's per ton EBITDA doubled to INR3,325 in FY21 (FY20:
INR1,482), the agency expects the same to moderate by 20%-40% in
FY22 owing to a correction in the prices of its products. Despite
this, the agency believes the EBITDA margins will remain
comfortable over the near term, backed by the benefits from ladle
refining furnace technology. The margin rose significantly to 7.6%
in FY21 (FY20: 3.2%) due to a fall in raw material prices, better
penetration of the brand in the local market, which offers high
margins, and higher absorption of fixed costs due to the increased
revenue.  The ROCE was 22% in FY21 (FY20: 7%).  

The ratings continued to be supported by promoter's experience of
more than three decades in the iron and steel industry, which has
led to longstanding relationships with suppliers and customers.
Furthermore, RSPL's brand -Radha 550 TMT- is widely known in and
around Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.

COMPANY PROFILE

Incorporated in 2007, RSPL manufactures thermo-mechanically treated
bars, billets, mild steel angles and sections at its facilities in
Nacharam, near Hyderabad.


RAJDHANI CRAFTS: CARE Keeps B+/A4 Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Rajdhani
Crafts Industries Private Limited (RCIPL) continues to remain in
the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term/           15.00      CARE B+; Stable/CARE A4;
   Short Term                      ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Bank Facilities                 Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 17, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of RCIPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
RCIPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. RCIPL continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 3, 2021, May 13, 2021, May 23, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

Jaipur (Rajasthan) based, RCIPL was formed as a proprietorship
concern in 1965 by Mr. Samir Agarwal along with his family members
under the name of Rajdhani Enterprises. Later in December 2009, the
firm was converted into a private limited company and the name was
changed to Rajdhani Crafts Industries Private Limited. RCIPL is
engaged in the manufacturing and export of wooden furniture and
handicraft items. The manufacturing unit of the company is located
at Vishwakarma Industrial Area, Jaipur. RCIPL exports its product
mainly to Australia, the Netherlands and the United States of
America and in domestic market , it sells its products mainly to
L&T and Simplex Infrastructures Limited (CARE A; Stable/CARE A1 as
of October 2017). The key raw material are Sheesham (Indian
Rosewood), Acacia, Mango & Reclaimed Teak wood etc. RCIPL imports
its raw material from Germany and Belgium and in domestic market it
procures from Uttar Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana. The company sells
its products under the brand name of 'Rajdhani'.


RAKMO PRESS: CARE Lowers Rating on INR6.75cr Loan to B-
-------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of
Rakmo Press Private Limited (RPPL), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       6.75       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category and
                                   Revised from CARE B; Stable

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 25, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of RPPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
RPPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. RPPL continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 11, 2021, May 21, 2021, May 31, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

The ratings have been revised on account of non-availability of
requisite information.

Delhi-based Rakmo Press Private Limited (RPPL) was incorporated in
the year 1987 and currently, it is being managed by Mr. Rakesh
Bhargava, Mr. Mukesh Bhargava, Ms. Geeta Bhargava and Ms. Nisha
Bhargava. The company is engaged in printing of catalogues, books,
calendar, journals, annual reports, dairies, broachers etc. The
company has its printing facility at Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh.

RATNAGARBHA AGRO: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Ratnagarbha
Agro Private Limited (RAPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      12.99       CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated July 1, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of RAPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
RAPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. RAPL continues to be
noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 17, 2021, May 27, 2021, June 6, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Hardoi (U.P) based Ratnagarbha Agro Private Limited (RAPL) was
incorporated in February 2007 by Mr. Shri Kishan Agrawal and his
son Mr. Ram Kishan Agrawal. However, the company started its
commercial operations in October 2013. RAPL is engaged in
processing of wheat into refined flour (Maida), Suji and flour
(Atta). The company has installed capacity of 90,000 metric tonne
per annum (MTPA) as on March 31, 2015 from its manufacturing unit
at Hardoi, Uttar Pradesh. RAPL procures raw material i.e. wheat
from the grain markets located in Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Delhi
and Haryana mainly on cash or advance basis. RAPL sells its
products under brand 'Ratan Bhog" mainly through commission agents,
brokers and wholesalers located in Delhi, Rajasthan, and Mumbai
etc. The products are sold in packaging of 100kg, 100kg and 50kg
for Atta, Maida and Suji.


RISHABH BUILDWELL: CARE Cuts Rating on INR5cr LT Loan to B-
-----------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of
Rishabh Buildwell Private Limited (RBPL), as:

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       5.00       CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category and
                                   moved to ISSUER NOT COOPERATING

                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE has been seeking no default statement from RBPL to monitor the
rating(s) vide e-mail communications dated July 7, 2021, August 2,
2021 among others and numerous phone calls. However, despite CARE's
repeated requests, the company has not provided no default
statement for monitoring the ratings. In line with the extant SEBI
guidelines, CARE has reviewed the rating on the basis of the best
available information which however, in CARE's opinion is not
sufficient to arrive at a fair rating. The rating on RBPL's bank
facilities will now be denoted as CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Incorporated in 2005, Rishabh Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (RBPL) is engaged
in development of real estate projects, mainly in NCR region. Till
March 31, 2018, the company has already executed commercial and
residential projects over an area of more than 20 lacs square feet
(lsf). RBPL belongs to Rishabh group, having presence in various
segments including hospitality, education, solar, Television
channel and real estate.


SAI SWADHIN: CARE Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Sai Swadhin
Commercials Private Limited (SSCPL) continues to remain in the
'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       7.64       CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated July 22, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of SSCPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
SSCPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. SSCPL continues to
be noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
June 7, 2021, June 17, 2021, June 27, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Sai Swadhin Commercials Private Limited (SSCPL) was incorporated in
August 2008, however after remaining dormant for seven years the
company started commercial operation from April 2015. The company
was promoted by Mr. Jami Ramesh, Mr. Jami Sivasai, Mrs. Jami Kavita
and Mrs. Jami Nirmala based out of Koraput, Odisha. The company has
been engaged in extraction of cashew nut shell liquid and cashew
de-oiled cake at its plant located at Ganjam, Odisha. The plant has
a processing capacity of 252,000 quintals for cashew de-oiled cake
and 108,000 quintals for cashew nut shell liquid. The company
procures its raw materials from domestic markets and sales through
dealers across all over India. Presently, the company has around 25
dealers.


SATNAM JEWELLS: CARE Keeps B- Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Sri Satnam
Jewells Private Limited (SSJPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       12.00      CARE B-; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated July 21, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of SSJPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
SSJPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. SSJPL continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
June 06, 2021, June 16, 2021, June 26, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Sri Satnam Jewells Private Limited (SSJPL) was incorporated on June
1, 2016, by Khurana family of Berhampur, Odisha with Shri Narayan
Khurana being the main promoter. SJPL is engaged in retailing of
gold and silver jewelry and precious & semiprecious stones studded
gold jewelry, through its sole retail outlet located in Berhampur,
Odisha. SJPL has entered into an authorized franchisee agreement
with Senco Gold Limited (SGL) since July 2016 and the franchise
agreement is valid till July 2019. The company offers wide range of
products to its customer that includes rings, earrings, pendants,
bracelets, necklaces, bangles and medallions under the brand name
of Senco Gold & Diamonds.

SEYA INDUSTRIES: Insolvency Resolution Process Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Seya Industries Limited
        T-14, M.I.D.C. Tarapur
        Boisar, Thane 401506

Insolvency Commencement Date: August 3, 2021

Court: National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench

Estimated date of closure of
insolvency resolution process: January 30, 2020
                               (180 days from commencement)

Insolvency professional: Anuj Bajpai

Interim Resolution
Professional:            Anuj Bajpai
                         Headway Resolution and Insolvency
                         Services Pvt. Ltd.
                         708, Raheja Centre, 7th Floor
                         Nariman Point, Mumbai 400021
                         Maharashtra
                         E-mail: anuj19603@yahoo.co.om
                                 cirpseya@gmail.com

Last date for
submission of claims:    September 2, 2021


SHUBH RICE: CARE Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating Category
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Shubh Rice
Exports Private Limited (SREPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank      12.04       CARE B+; Stable; ISSUER NOT
   Facilities                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   To remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category  
  
Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 16, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of SREPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
SREPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the
rating and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating
exercise as agreed to in its Rating Agreement. SREPL continues to
be non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
May 02, 2021, May 12, 2021, May 22, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

Shubh Rice Exports Private Limited (SRE) was incorporated in July
2013, however, the commercial operations commenced in September
2014. The company is currently being managed by Mr. Upkar Chand and
Mr. Rajesh Kumar. The company is engaged in processing of paddy at
its manufacturing facility located at. Patiala, Punjab having an
installed capacity of 52800 metric tonnes of paddy per annum as on
December 31, 2017. SRE procures paddy directly from local grain
markets through commission agents located in Punjab. Furthermore,
the company sells its product, ie, basmati rice under the brand
name of 'Moti Bagh' and 'Moti Bhandhar' in the states of Punjab,
Haryana and Gujarat through a network of commission agents.

SIDDS JEWELS: CARE Moves C Debt Rating to Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings has migrated the rating on bank facilities of Sidds
Jewels India LLP (SJIL) to Issuer Not Cooperating category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       3.20       CARE C; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating moved to ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category

   Long Term/         136.25       CARE D/CARE D; ISSUER NOT
   Short Term                      COOPERATING Rating moved to
   Bank Facilities                 ISSUER NOT COOPERATING category

   Short Term           1.36       CARE A4; ISSUER NOT
   Bank Facilities                 COOPERATING Rating moved to
                                   ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   Category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE has been seeking information from SJIL to monitor the
rating(s) vide e-mail communications dated August 6, 2021, August
5, 2021, August 4, 2021, August 3, 2021, August 2, 2021, July 30,
2021 etc., and numerous phone calls. However, despite CARE's
repeated requests, firm has not provided the requisite information
for monitoring the ratings. In line with the extant SEBI
guidelines, CARE has reviewed the rating on the basis of the best
available information, which however, in CARE's opinion is not
sufficient to arrive at a fair rating. The rating on SJIL's bank
facilities will now be denoted as CARE D/CARE C/CARE A4; ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

The ratings consider delay in servicing of its existing debt
obligation as confirmed by bankers. As informed by banker, SJIL has
fully repaid the Long-term bank facilities (Term loan) and
Short-term bank facilities (Bank Guarantee), however, CARE is in
the process of acquiring required documents for withdrawal of
ratings.

Detailed description of the key rating drivers

At the time of last rating on May 31, 2021, the following were the
key rating drivers

* Delay in servicing of debt obligations: As confirmed by the
lenders, there are ongoing delays in debt (working capital
facilities) servicing obligation of the firm. Decline in total
operating income and significant increase in working capital cycle
(largely on account of increased trade receivables) has resulted
into significant deterioration of liquidity profile of the group
over the past one year.

Analytical approach: Combined

CARE has combined the financials of Sidds Jewels Private Limited,
Sidds Jewels India LLP and Pooja Diam LLP due to the group being
controlled by same promoter group and the decision-making being
centralized. The group has common finance and administration teams.
Also, the group enjoys business synergies with operations in same
line of business.

Incorporated in 2003, Sidds Jewels India LLP (SJIL) is promoted by
Mr. Sunil S. Kothari belonging to the Kothari family from Mumbai.
The company is into manufacturing and export of diamond studded
jewelry. The manufacturing facility is located in SEEPZ, Mumbai
which employs around 200 employees. Apart from interest in G&J
business, the Kothari family also has businesses in hospitality,
real estate, horticulture and plantation industry.


SIWAL INFRACON: CARE Keeps C Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Siwal
Infracon Private Limited (SIPL) continues to remain in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       6.28       CARE C; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

   Long Term/           4.00       CARE C/CARE A4; ISSUER NOT  
   Short Term                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
   Bank Facilities                 to remain under ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated June 19, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of SIPL under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as
SIPL had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating
and had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. SIPL continues to be
noncooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email
dated May 5, 2021, May 15, 2021, May 25, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating.

Jaipur-based (Rajasthan) Siwal Infracon Private Limited (SIPL) was
initially formed in 2004 as a partnership concern in the name of
M/s Siwal Builders & Developers by its key promoter, Mr. Rajesh
Siwal. Subsequently, there was amendment in partnership deed which
was later reconstituted as a private limited company in 2012 with
assuming its present name. Initially, SIPL was primarily engaged in
execution of civil construction contract works pertaining to real
estate projects for private sector companies; however, form FY14
on-wards SIPL had also ventured into executing project related to
commercial and institution with major contracts secured from
private sector clientele located in Rajasthan.


STAR TRACE: Insolvency Resolution Process Case Summary
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Star Trace Private Limited
        New No. 5, Old No. 7
        Jeevanandham Street
        Red Hills
        Chennai 600052

Insolvency Commencement Date: August 9, 2021

Court: National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench

Estimated date of closure of
insolvency resolution process: February 5, 2022

Insolvency professional: K Ganesan

Interim Resolution
Professional:            K Ganesan
                         New No. 9, Old No. 2/1
                         Reddi Kuppam Road
                         West Mambalam
                         Chennai 600033
                         E-mail: ganesank453@gmail.com
                                 ganeshkrishrp19@gmailcom

Last date for
submission of claims:    August 23, 2021


SURVIVAL TECHNOLOGIES: Ind-Ra Cuts Long-Term Issuer Rating to 'BB'
------------------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has downgraded Survival
Technologies Pvt. Ltd.'s Long-Term Issuer Rating to 'IND BB (ISSUER
NOT COOPERATING)' from 'IND BBB (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)'. The
issuer did not participate in the rating exercise despite
continuous requests and follow-ups by the agency.

The instrument-wise rating actions are:

-- INR233.19 mil. Term loan due on March 2021 downgraded with
     IND BB (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING) rating;

-- INR120 mil. Cash credit downgraded with IND BB (ISSUER NOT
     COOPERATING) rating;

-- INR140 mil. Packing credit limit/pre-shipment credit in
     foreign currency downgraded with IND BB (ISSUER NOT
     COOPERATING) rating;

-- INR120 mil. Letter of credit downgraded with IND A4+ (ISSUER
     NOT COOPERATING) rating; and

-- INR50 mil. Fund-based limit downgraded with IND BB (ISSUER NOT

     COOPERATING) / IND A4+ (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING).

Note: ISSUER NOT COOPERATING: Issuer did not cooperate; based on
the best-available information.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The downgrade is pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Board of
India's circular SEBI/HO/MIRSD/CRADT/CIR/P/2020/2 dated January 3,
2020. According to the circular, any issuer with an
investment-grade rating remains non-cooperative with rating agency
for over six months, should be downgraded to sub-investment grade
rating category. Survival Technologies Pvt. Ltd. has been in the
non-cooperative with the agency since November 30, 2020.

Survival Technologies Pvt. Ltd.'s current rating of 'IND BB+
(ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)' may not reflect its credit strength as
the issuer has been non-cooperative with the agency. Therefore,
investors and other users are advised to take appropriate caution
while using these ratings.

COMPANY PROFILE

Formed in 2005, Survival Technologies manufactures 400 different
types of fine and specialty chemicals. It has two manufacturing
sites, one in Ankleshwar and in Vapi. It has a total production
capacity of 550 metric tons per annum. STPL has an in-house
research and development facility, which is certified by the
Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. The proposed
greenfield capex of the Mahad unit is postponed due to pending
regulatory approvals and other permissions.


WEST INDIA: Ind-Ra Lowers Long-Term Issuer Rating to 'BB'
---------------------------------------------------------
India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) has downgraded The West India
Power Equipments Private Limited's (WIPE) Long-Term Issuer Rating
to 'IND BB (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)' from 'IND BBB- (ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING)'. The issuer did not participate in the surveillance
exercise despite continuous requests and follow-ups by the agency.
Thus, the rating is based on the best available information.
Therefore, investors and other users are advised to take
appropriate caution while using these ratings.

The instrument-wise rating actions are:

-- INR5 mil. Non-fund-based working capital limits downgraded
     with IND A4+ (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING) rating;

-- INR305 mil. Fund-based working capital limits* is withdrawn;
     and

-- INR114.12 mil. Term loans* due on March 2026 is withdrawn.

*withdrawn on the receipt of no-dues certificate from the lender

Note: ISSUER NOT COOPERATING: Issuer did not cooperate; based on
the best available information.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The downgrade is pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Board of
India circular SEBI/HO/MIRSD/CRADT/CIR/P/2020/2 dated January 3,
2020. According to the circular, any issuer having an
investment-grade rating remaining non-cooperative with a rating
agency for over six months should be downgraded to a sub-investment
grade rating.

Ind-Ra has withdrawn the ratings of the term loan and the
fund-based working capital limits on the receipt of a no-dues
certificate from the lenders.

The current outstanding rating of 'IND BB (ISSUER NOT COOPERATING)'
may not reflect WIPE's credit strength as the issuer has been
non-cooperative with the agency since June 22, 2020. Therefore,
investors and other users are advised to take appropriate caution
while using this rating.

COMPANY PROFILE

WIPE, which commenced operations in 1986, manufactures wiper
systems and other ancillaries, primarily for passenger cars. Its
plants are in Jagdishpur, Pune, Rewari, Kancheepuram and Lucknow.


WHITEFIELDS APPAREL: CARE Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CARE Ratings said the rating for the bank facilities of Whitefields
Apparel (WA) continues to remain in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category.

                       Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term Bank       9.20       CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

   Short Term Bank      3.35       CARE D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
   Facilities                      Rating continues to remain
                                   under ISSUER NOT COOPERATING
                                   category

Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers

CARE had, vide its press release dated August 10, 2020, placed the
rating(s) of WA under the 'issuer non-cooperating' category as WA
had failed to provide information for monitoring of the rating and
had not paid the surveillance fees for the rating exercise as
agreed to in its Rating Agreement. WA continues to be
non-cooperative despite repeated requests for submission of
information through e-mails, phone calls and a letter/email dated
June 26, 2021, July 6, 2021 and July 16, 2021.

In line with the extant SEBI guidelines, CARE has reviewed the
rating on the basis of the best available information which
however, in CARE's opinion is not sufficient to arrive at a fair
rating.

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public
at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the
above rating(s).

Whitefields Apparel (WA) was established in April 2011 as a
proprietorship concern by Mrs. Kalpana Anand, daughter of Mr. K. P.
Ramasamy, the Chairman of K.P.R. Mill Limited. WA is a
Tirupur-based firm engaged in manufacture and export of knitted
garments.



=========
J A P A N
=========

EAST JAPAN: Egan-Jones Hikes Senior Unsecured Ratings to BB
-----------------------------------------------------------
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on August 20, 2021, upgraded the
foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings on
debt issued by East Japan Railway Company to BB from BBB-.

Headquartered in Shibuya City, Tokyo, Japan, East Japan Railway
Company provides rail transportation services in the Kanto and
Tohoku regions, including Tokyo.


TOKYU CORP: Egan-Jones Retains BB- Sr. Unsec. Debt Ratings
----------------------------------------------------------
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on August 19, 2021, maintained its
'BB-' foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings
on debt issued by Tokyu Corporation. EJR also maintained its 'B'
rating on commercial paper issued by the Company.

Headquartered in Shibuya City, Tokyo, Japan, Tokyu Corporation
provides railway services.




===============
M O N G O L I A
===============

TRANSPORT & DEVELOPMENT: Moody's Affirms 'B3' LT Deposit Ratings
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Transport and Development
Bank LLC's (TransBank) B3 local- and foreign-currency long-term
deposit ratings.

At the same time, Moody's has affirmed all of the bank's ratings
and assessments.

The outlook on TransBank's ratings remains stable.

The rating action follows the Bank of Mongolia's approval on July
28, 2021 the merger of TransBank and Credit Bank LLC (Credit Bank,
unrated). The merger, which will take effect from August 25, 2021,
is part of the plan to convert TransBank into a closed joint stock
company in accordance with the Mongolian Banking law.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The affirmation of TransBank's B3 local- and foreign-currency
long-term deposit ratings reflects Moody's assessment that the
credit profile of the merged entity will be broadly similar to that
of TransBank prior to the merger. The B3 long-term deposit reflects
its very high capitalization, which offsets its challenges as a
smaller bank in accessing stable deposit funding and managing
liquidity; and its relatively high concentration to the mining and
construction sectors. The bank's b3 Baseline Credit Assessment
(BCA) is the same as the bank's deposit ratings, which include no
uplift for government support.

The merger will close with a share swap with no share premium
involved. All assets, liabilities, equities, and branches of Credit
Bank will be consolidated into TransBank.

The merger will result in a larger loan portfolio and branch
network, while the composition of the loan portfolio will broadly
be unchanged, with relatively high exposures to corporates. The
merged entity is planning to gradually increase its retail loans
over the next 12 to 18 months, to around 20% of the total loan
portfolio from 14% at the time of the merger. In addition, the
merger may lead to a stronger deposit franchise, lower costs, and
higher profitability.

Moody's has not incorporated affiliate support for TransBank, and
therefore, the Adjusted BCA is in line with the bank's BCA of b3.

No government support uplift is reflected in TransBank's long-term
ratings because Moody's assumes a low level of government support
for the merged entity given its importance to the Mongolian banking
system is limited with a combined market share of around 1%-2%.
Furthermore, the bank's BCA is already at the same level as the
Mongolian government's issuer rating of B3.

TransBank's long-term Counterparty Risk (CR) Assessment of B2(cr)
and long-term Counterparty Risk Ratings (CRRs) of B2/B3 take into
consideration the b3 Adjusted BCA and Moody's Basic Loss Given
Framework (LGF) analysis, which positions the Preliminary Rating
Assessment of the CR Assessment and CRRs one notch above the bank's
Adjusted BCA, prior to the incorporation of government support.

ESG Considerations

Moody's has considered the positive impact of the merger on
TransBank's corporate governance under its environmental, social
and governance (ESG) framework, given its implications for the
bank's organization structure. Following the merger, the number of
TransBank's shareholders will increase to eight from current three,
reducing the bank's ownership concentration and achieving a better
balance of ownership, management and control. The action reflects
the impact that governance factors have on TransBank's credit
quality.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

TransBank's b3 BCA is at the same level as the sovereign rating,
and upward rating pressure is unlikely to develop in the absence of
an upgrade of the sovereign rating.

Moody's could downgrade the bank's ratings if its BCA or the
sovereign rating is downgraded, or both. The bank's BCA could be
downgraded if there are signs of asset quality deterioration in its
mining and construction loan book, given its credit concentration
risks to these two sectors. A significant deterioration in the
bank's funding or liquidity strength, or both, could also result in
a downgrade of the bank's BCA.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Banks
Methodology published in July 2021.

Transport and Development Bank LLC, headquartered in Ulaanbaatar,
Mongolia, had total assets of MNT360.2 billion (USD126.2 million)
as of the end of December 2020.

LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS AND ASSESSMENTS

Issuer: Transport and Development Bank LLC

Baseline Credit Assessment (BCA) of b3 affirmed

Adjusted BCA of b3 affirmed

Long-term Counterparty Risk Assessment of B2(cr) affirmed

Short-term Counterparty Risk Assessment of NP(cr) affirmed

Local currency long-term Counterparty Risk Rating of B2 affirmed

Foreign currency long-term Counterparty Risk Rating of B3
affirmed

Local currency and foreign currency short-term Counterparty Risk
Ratings of NP affirmed

Local currency and foreign currency long-term deposit rating of B3
affirmed, outlook remains stable

Local currency and foreign currency short-term deposit ratings of
NP affirmed

Local currency and foreign currency long-term issuer ratings of B3
affirmed, outlook remains stable

Local currency and foreign currency short-term issuer ratings of
NP affirmed

Outlook remains stable




=================
S I N G A P O R E
=================

ANZ SINGAPORE: Creditors' Proofs of Debt Due on Sept. 25
--------------------------------------------------------
Creditors of ANZ Singapore Limited, which is in members' voluntary
liquidation, are required to file their proofs of debt by Sept. 25,
2021, to be included in the company's dividend distribution.

The company commenced wind-up proceedings on Aug. 20, 2021.

The company's liquidator is:

         Thio Khiaw Ping Kelvin
         Chan Li Shan
         c/o Ardent Corporate Recovery Pte Ltd
         30 Cecil Street #15-08 Prudential Tower
         Singapore 049712


EUNETWORKS 1: Commences Wind-Up Proceedings
-------------------------------------------
Members of Eunetworks 1 Pte Ltd, on Aug. 23, 2021, passed a
resolution to voluntarily wind up the company's operations.

The company's liquidator is:

         Mr. Leong Chang Hong
         Boardroom Corporate & Advisory Services
         50 Raffles Place
         #32-01 Singapore Land Tower
         Singapore 048623


GUIDANCE MARINE: Creditors' Meetings Set for Sept. 6
----------------------------------------------------
Guidance Marine Pte Limited will hold a meeting for its creditors
on Sept. 6, 2021, at 3:00 p.m., at via electronic means.

Agenda of the meeting includes:

   a. to receive a full statement of the company's affairs
      together with a list of creditors and the estimated amount
      of their claims;

   b. to appoint Liquidator(s); and

   c. to appoint a Committee of Inspection ("COI") of not more
      than 5 members, if thought fit; and

   d. any other business.


IX BIOPHARMA: Net Loss Narrows to SGD8.2MM in Year Ended June 30
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Business Times reports that iX Biopharma said its net loss for
the financial year ended June 30 narrowed to SGD8.2 million from
the previous year's loss of SGD10.5 million.

This is due to a 77 per cent increase in revenue to SGD1.7 million,
boosted by demand for the group's nutraceutical products and
WaferiX-based product development services from pharmaceutical
companies in China, the Catalist-listed company said in an exchange
filing on Aug. 23, BT relays.

iX Biopharma Ltd is a Singapore-based specialty pharmaceutical and
nutraceutical company. The Company operates business model from
drug development to manufacturing and supply, with facilities in
Australia. The Company focuses on the development and
commercialization of therapies for diseases of the central nervous
system using its platform sublingual drug delivery technology,
WaferiX. Its pipeline of products under development includes
Wafermine (ketamine wafer) and BnoX (buprenorphine wafer) for pain
management. It offers drugs for the treatment of erectile
dysfunction, Wafesil and Silcap. Its nutraceuticals division,
Entity Health Limited (Entity), is engaged in the development and
commercialization of nutraceutical products that address specific
conditions and improve quality of life. It distributes its Entity
line of nutraceutical products in Australia through pharmacies and
health food shops and in China and globally through its online
e-commerce stores.


NO SIGNBOARD: Reports Impairment Loss of More Than SGD478,000
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Business Times reports that No Signboard Holdings recorded an
impairment loss of over SGD478,000 due to losses incurred by its
restaurants affected by the Covid-19 pandemic, the Catalist-listed
company said in response to an SGX query.

In particular, its two outlets of the Little Sheep Hotpot business
and three Mom's Touch fastfood outlets recorded lower revenue than
anticipated due to Heightened Alert restrictions, which include a
ban on dine-ins, resulting in a write-down of nearly SGD430,000 for
its third quarter, BT discloses.

No Signboard Holdings Ltd., an investment holding company, manages
and operates food and beverage outlets in Singapore. The company
operates a chain of seafood restaurants under the No Signboard
Seafood brand that serve various seafood cuisine prepared in
Chinese and Singapore styles. It owns and operates three
restaurants, as well as operates one restaurant under a franchise
agreement. The company also produces, promotes, and distributes
beer under the Draft Denmark brand; and distributes various third
party brands of beer, as well as operates as an OEM beer supplier
for third party brands. In addition, it produces and distributes
ready meals through a network of vending machines. Further, the
company engages in leasing financial intangible assets, such as
patents, trademarks, brand names, etc.


SINOPIPE HOLDINGS: Creditors' Meetings Set for Sept. 8
------------------------------------------------------
Sinopipe Holdings Limited will hold a meeting for its creditors on
Sept. 8, 2021, at 2:00 p.m., via a live web broadcast.

Agenda of the meeting includes:

   a. to receive a full statement of the company's affairs
      together with a list of creditors and the estimated amount
      of their claims;

   b. to resolve that Cameron Lindsay Duncan and David Dong-Won
      Kim care of KordaMentha be and are hereby appointed jointly
      and severally as Liquidators of the Company for the purpose
      of such winding up and that their remuneration be based on
      their normal scale rates and be paid out of the Company's
      assets;

   c. to appoint a Committee of Inspection of not more than five
      members, if thought fit;

   d. to resolve that the Liquidators be at liberty to open,
      maintain and operate any bank account or an account for
      monies received by him as Liquidators of the Company, with
      such bank as the Liquidators deem fit; and

   e. to resolve that the Liquidators be authorised to exercise
      any of the powers provided by Section 144(1)(b), (c), (d),
      (e) and (f) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution

      Act 2018; and

   f. any other business.



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Joy A. Agravante, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2021.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9482.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding,
electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited
without prior written permission of the publishers.
Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed
to be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

TCR-AP subscription rate is US$775 for 6 months delivered via e-
mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance
thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information, contact
Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.



                *** End of Transmission ***