/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCRAP_Public/210325.mbx        T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

                     A S I A   P A C I F I C

          Thursday, March 25, 2021, Vol. 24, No. 55

                           Headlines



A U S T R A L I A

BELGRAVE STREET: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for March 30
CREDIT FOUR: First Creditors' Meeting Set for April 1
CROWN GROUP: First Creditors' Meeting Set for April 1
GREENSILL CAPITAL: Australian Fintechs Get Offers From Buyers
GROCON GROUP: Creditors Urged to Back Grollo Rescue Plan

HUNT AND GATHER: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for April 1
INNOCO PTY: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for March 30
PERTH AUTOTYRE: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for March 30
[*] AUSTRALIA: 45% of Live Music Firms Expect to Close in 3 Months


B A N G L A D E S H

PEOPLE'S LEASING: Recovers Only BDT30cr From Defaulters


I N D I A

AGARWALLA TIMBERS: ICRA Withdraws B+ Rating on INR6.0cr Loan
BANSIDHAR AGARWALLA: ICRA Keeps B- Ratings in Not Cooperating
DEVEURO PAPER: ICRA Removes D Rating from Issuer Not Cooperating
EKAM AGRO: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating Category
EMPEE SUGARS: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating

GANAPATI MOTORS: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
INDIA: Bad Loan Ruling Weighs as Banks Retreat Across Asia
JAMPANA CONSTRUCTION: ICRA Keeps B+ Ratings in Not Cooperating
K S OILS: NCLAT Directs Liquidation of Edible Oil Company
KAILASH TRADING: ICRA Lowers Rating on INR4cr LT Loan to D

KALYA CONSTRUCTIONS: ICRA Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
KAYNES TECHNOLOGY: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
MALHATI TEA: ICRA Keeps B- Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
MARUTI NUTRIMENT: ICRA Withdraws B Rating on INR2.50cr Loan
MIZORAM ISPAT: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating

MM INTERNATIONAL: ICRA Lowers Rating on INR21.50cr Loan to D
NABADIGANT EDUCATIONAL: ICRA Keeps B+ Ratings in Not Cooperating
PRAKASH OFFSET: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
RAMAN AGRO: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
RLJ MULTIGRAIN: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating

SRAVANTHI ENERGY: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
SVS CONSTRUCTIONS: ICRA Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
TRIDENT SUGARS: ICRA Keeps C Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
TRIVENI ENTERPRISES: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
URBANEDGE HOTELS: ICRA Reaffirms C+ Rating on INR6cr Term Loan

VENSON ELECTRIC: ICRA Keeps B+ on INR3cr Debt in Not Cooperating
VISHNUSHIVA INFRA: ICRA Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
WOOLWAYS (INDIA): ICRA Keeps D on INR10cr Debt in Not Cooperating


P H I L I P P I N E S

PHILIPPINE TELEGRAPH: Seeks Reversal of Approved Capital Hike
PHOENIX PETROLEUM: Plans Asset Sale, Transfer to Manage Debts


S I N G A P O R E

MASTERPRO HARDWARE: Creditors' Meetings Set for April 5
OCAP MANAGEMENT: Court Enters Wind-Up Order

                           - - - - -


=================
A U S T R A L I A
=================

BELGRAVE STREET: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for March 30
-----------------------------------------------------------
A second meeting of creditors in the proceedings of:

    - Belgrave Street Developments Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Fairfield) Developer Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Belgrave St) Developer Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Fairfield) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon Builders (Vic) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Parklands) Holdings Pty Ltd
    - Grocon Services Pty Ltd
    - QV No 1 Pty Ltd
    - QV No 2 Pty Ltd ATF Grocon Land Owning Trust 2
    - QV No 3 Pty Ltd ATF Grocon Land Owning Trust 3
    - QV No 4 Pty Ltd ATF Grocon Land Owning Trust 4
    - QV No 5 Pty Ltd ATF Grocon Land Owning Trust 5
    - Grocon Operations Pty Ltd
    - Grocon Developments NSW Pty Ltd
    - 61 Lt Collins Street Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Victoria Street) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon Developments (Box Hill) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (480 Queen Street) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Scots Church) Pty Ltd
    - QV Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Bouverie Street) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Pitt Street) Developments Pty Ltd
    - Grocon Developments (55 Elizabeth St) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon Constructors (SA) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Baroona Rd) Holdings Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Bouverie St) Holdings Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (CB) Development Manager Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Spring Street) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon QV Investments Pty Ltd
    - QV Property Management Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Pixel) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Swanston Square) Holdings Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Carlton Brewery) Developments Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (SQ Stage 2) Developments Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Victoria Street) Developments Pty Ltd ATF various
      trusts
    - Grocon (FCAD) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon (Castlereagh St, NSW) Pty Ltd
    - Grocon Development Holdings Pty Ltd

has been set for March 30, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. via videoconference
on Microsoft Teams.

The purpose of the meeting is (1) to receive the report by the
Administrator about the business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances of the Company; and (2) for the creditors of the
Company to resolve whether the Company will execute a deed of
company arrangement, the administration should end, or the Company
be wound up.

Creditors wishing to attend are advised proofs and proxies should
be submitted to the Administrator by March 29, 2021, at 9:30 a.m.

Craig Peter Shepard and Andrew Knight of KordaMentha were appointed
as administrators of Belgrave Street et al. on Nov. 27, 2020.


CREDIT FOUR: First Creditors' Meeting Set for April 1
-----------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of Credit Four
Pty Ltd will be held on April 1, 2021, at 10:30 a.m.

David Michael Stimpson of SV Partners was appointed as
administrator of Credit Four on March 22, 2021.


CROWN GROUP: First Creditors' Meeting Set for April 1
-----------------------------------------------------
A first meeting of the creditors in the proceedings of Crown Group
Pty Ltd will be held on April 1, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. via
teleconference facilities.

Richard Rohrt of Hamilton Murphy Advisory was appointed as
administrator of Crown Group on March 22, 2021.


GREENSILL CAPITAL: Australian Fintechs Get Offers From Buyers
-------------------------------------------------------------
Australian Financial Review reports that Greensill Capital
Australia has received offers from potential buyers of fintechs
Earnd and Omni Technologies but creditors face a bleak outlook
because they are among only a handful of "hard assets" able to be
sold by administrators.

AFR relates that Grant Thornton, Greensill's administrators, also
have furniture from the firm's Australian offices which they will
try to sell but even that avenue is looking dire because of the big
structural shift to working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic,
which means demand for office equipment is low.

Earnd, a fintech company that provides services allowing workers to
be paid wages earlier than the usual cycle, and lender Omni
Technologies are wholly owned subsidiaries of Greensill's
Australian parent. They are worth several million dollars combined,
the report notes.

According to AFR, Greensill's Australian offices were leased and so
there are no property assets available to try to bolster the
eventual returns to creditors.

Greensill bought Earnd in March 2020 for around AUD2 million, and
then bought Colombian start-up OmniLatAm (a subsidiary of Cayman
Islands-based Omni Technologies) in mid-2020 as part of plans to
expand into Latin America.

AFR notes that Omni uses technology to provide fast finance to
clients, and its chief executive Diego Caicedo said last year it
did not ask for financial statements because "they only tell you
about the past".

The former owners of Earnd and Omni, which include NAB Ventures,
have submitted claims for about AUD15.5 million still owed
following their sale, AFR discloses.

Greensill's 35 former Australian employees, who are owed AUD3
million to AUD5 million in wages and other entitlements including
leave allowances, will get paid first, AFR notes. Former staffers
are expected to be told as early as this week how much money they
are likely to receive from administrators.

According to AFR, the insurers of Greensill's securities have not
made claims in the Australian administration. Its biggest insurer,
Japan's Tokio Marine, said on March 23 that insurance from its
subsidiary Bond & Credit Company over Greensill's securities only
covered accounts receivable, not Greensill itself, and that the
firm's insolvency "does not crystallise" any immediate financial
exposure because it has reinsurance.

"Our expected net exposure remains unchanged," Tokio Marine said in
its first public comments on the impact of Greensill's collapse,
AFR relays.

"We would like to clarify that trade credit insurance does not
cover the liability of the policyholder nor the insured; rather it
covers the accounts receivable of the insured.

"Hence if Greensill were the insured, trade credit insurance would
cover what Greensill is owed, rather than what Greensill owes
others."

AFR adds that the Japanese group said that it did not expect any
material financial impact from Greensill's collapse this year or
over the next fiscal year but that it would monitor the situation
closely. "We continue to assess the validity of the cover extended
to Greensill."

Bond & Credit Company underwriting manager Greg Brereton was fired
last July by Tokio Marine for issuing too many insurance policies
covering invoices packaged by Greensill, AFR adds.

                      About Greensill Capital

Greensill Capital is an independent financial services firm and
principal investor group. The Company offers structures trade
finance, working capital optimization, specialty financing and
contract monetization.

Matthew James Byrnes, Philip Campbell-Wilson and Michael McCann of
Grant Thornton were appointed as administrators of Greensill
Capital on March 9, 2021.


GROCON GROUP: Creditors Urged to Back Grollo Rescue Plan
--------------------------------------------------------
Larry Schlesinger at Australian Financial Review reports that
Grocon administrator KordaMentha has urged creditors of the 88
collapsed companies in the once mighty construction and development
giant to back a rescue plan proposed by chief executive and family
scion Daniel Grollo.

AFR relates that Mr. Grollo's deed of company arrangement proposal
(DOCA) was revealed as part of KordaMentha's offical administrators
report lodged with ASIC on March 23.

According to AFR, the DOCA is based on Grocon securing a
significant payout - potentially in excess of AUD200 million - in
its dispute with Infrastructure NSW over the botched Central
Barangaroo Project from which it can disperse the net proceeds to
creditors.

AFR says Mr. Grollo, the son of Grocon founder Bruno Grollo, blames
the company's woes entirely on the losses it suffered at Barangaroo
and the conduct of INSW.

The case is due to be heard in the NSW Supreme Court in early
2022.

Grocon creditors, owed around AUD100 million, will vote on the DOCA
at a crunch second creditors meeting on March 31, the report
notes.

To be successful, the DOCA must be approved by 50 per cent of
creditors by number and 50 per cent in value. Some creditors, like
fund manager APN have already indicated they will vote for
liquidation, according to AFR.

"The key objective of the proposed DOCA is to maximise the return
to creditors of the administration entities," AFR quotes a Grocon
spokeswoman as saying.  "In Daniel Grollo's view, the proposed DOCA
will deliver an improved and faster return for creditors of the
administration entities when compared with the return if the
entities were wound up."

AFR relates that KordaMentha said it believed it was in the
interests of creditors of the 88 companies to execute the pooled
DOCA on the basis that they could get a better and faster financial
return from a successful outcome in Grocon's Barangaroo claim than
would otherwise be available in a winding up.

Also, as part of the DOCA proposal, employees and small creditors -
those owed less than AUD10,000 - would be paid out in full from an
upfront cash contribution of AUD10 million to be made within 30
days of the DOCA being executed. This in exchange for the transfer
of related party loans and shares in one entity to DOCA entities
controlled by Mr. Grollo, AFR relays.

"In our opinion it is not in creditors' interests that the
administration of the companies end. The companies are insolvent
with little or no prospect of being able to pay their outstanding
liabilities," KordaMentha said, AFR relays.

"The pooled DOCA proposal provides a similar or better outcome for
creditors of each of the companies in the group."

Under the pooled DOCA, the estimated return for large creditors -
those owed more than AUD10,000 - and litigation creditors like
listed fund manager APN is only slightly better than under
liquidation scenario, according to AFR.

KordaMentha estimates they could get between 3 and 100 cents in the
dollar under the DOCA compared with nil to 100 cents under a
liquidation scenario. However pursuing liquidation actions would
also require third-party funding given the 88 companies in
administration have no money.

The administrators report showed total creditor claims of around
AUD100 million (excluding related parties) including AUD14.4
million in GST payments owed to the ATO, AFR discloses.

Large creditors, mostly subcontractors and tradies, are owed a
combined AUD31 million while bond providers are owed AUD17.1
million.

AFR says the largest litigation creditor is the Liberman
family-backed Impact Investments Group which has a claim of AUD18.7
million for costs related to securing a replacement builder for its
Collingwood office project now being constructed by Probuild.

Some like APN Property Group, which has a claim against Grocon over
a Melbourne office development, have indicated they will vote for a
liquidation, arguing it will allow liquidators to pursue entities
outside the 88 companies, including more than AUD90 million of
loans outstanding to Mr Daniel Grollo and his wife ex-wife
Katherina.

The mammoth 1567-page administrators report noted the 88 Grocon
companies were likely insolvent in 2019, at the same time as the
directors sought advice on protections under the Safe Harbour
laws.

According to AFR, the report said certain related-party loan
transactions may constitute uncommercial or unreasonable
director-related transactions, but found no evidence of the
commission of any offences in relation the company.

The report also said that Mr Grollo's ex-wife Katherina, as part of
her property settlement application, had sought to have the
penthouse in the Eureka Tower be transferred to her. The
administrators said they had written to her lawyers to reject that
claim, AFR relays.

The 80th floor penthouse in the skyscraper built by Grocon is in
the process of being put up for sale. Proceeds from the sale will
be part of any return to creditors under the DOCA proposal.

Australia-based Grocon engages in development, construction and
funds management.  Grocon was founded in 1954 and has been run by
three generations of the Grollo family.  

In late 2020, 42 Grocon companies were placed into administration.
Administrators were also appointed on Feb. 22, 2021, to oversee
Grocon Group Holdings Pty Ltd, Grocon Constructors (NSW) Pty Ltd
and 43 other development-specific companies.


HUNT AND GATHER: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for April 1
----------------------------------------------------------
A second meeting of creditors in the proceedings of Hunt and Gather
Events Pty Limited has been set for April 1, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. at
the offices of SM Solvency Accountants, 10/144 Edward Street, in
Brisbane, Queensland.

The purpose of the meeting is (1) to receive the report by the
Administrator about the business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances of the Company; and (2) for the creditors of the
Company to resolve whether the Company will execute a deed of
company arrangement, the administration should end, or the Company
be wound up.

Creditors wishing to attend are advised proofs and proxies should
be submitted to the Administrator by March 31, 2021, at 4:30 p.m.

SM Solvency Accountants were appointed as administrators of Hunt
and Gather on Feb. 25, 2021.


INNOCO PTY: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for March 30
------------------------------------------------------
A second meeting of creditors in the proceedings of Innoco Pty
Limited has been set for March 30, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. via virtual
meeting.

The purpose of the meeting is (1) to receive the report by the
Administrator about the business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances of the Company; and (2) for the creditors of the
Company to resolve whether the Company will execute a deed of
company arrangement, the administration should end, or the Company
be wound up.

Creditors wishing to attend are advised proofs and proxies should
be submitted to the Administrator by March 29, 2021, at 5:00 p.m.

Anthony Elkerton of DW Advisory was appointed as administrator of  
Innoco Pty on Feb. 24, 2021.


PERTH AUTOTYRE: Second Creditors' Meeting Set for March 30
----------------------------------------------------------
A second meeting of creditors in the proceedings of Perth Autotyre
Pty Ltd has been set for March 30, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. via
teleconference facility.

The purpose of the meeting is (1) to receive the report by the
Administrator about the business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances of the Company; and (2) for the creditors of the
Company to resolve whether the Company will execute a deed of
company arrangement, the administration should end, or the Company
be wound up.

Creditors wishing to attend are advised proofs and proxies should
be submitted to the Administrator by March 29, 2021, at 5:00 p.m.

Mathieu Tribut of GTS Advisory was appointed as administrator of  
Perth Autotyre on Feb. 22, 2021.


[*] AUSTRALIA: 45% of Live Music Firms Expect to Close in 3 Months
------------------------------------------------------------------
Lois Maskiell at SmartCompany reports that the live music industry
is calling for travel permits and more consistency across state
restrictions to help the ailing sector survive once JobKeeper winds
down on March 28.

According to SmartCompany, a recent survey by the Australian Live
Music Business Council (ALMBC), which represents 600 small
businesses and sole traders, found almost 70% of live music
businesses had seen their revenue drop by 75% to 100% since
lockdowns began in March last year.

SmartCompany relates that the poll also found 77% of businesses
will only survive the next six months if trading conditions
improve, and 45% of businesses expect to close by June.

ALMBC board member and chief executive at Select Music Agency,
Stephen Wade, said the end of the JobKeeper wage subsidy scheme
will have a significant impact on the industry.

"It will have a major effect because we're in a situation where
still a year after we first closed down, we do not have any
certainty as to when our industry will be back to 100%," the report
quotes Mr. Wade as saying.

Mr. Wade said it is essential that state governments work together
to establish consistent capacity limits and restrictions for live
music events and remove some of the "alarming inconsistencies,"
SmartCompany relays.

"If you have a 1,000-person capacity venue in Perth, Brisbane,
Sydney and Melbourne, in each of those cities the capacity would be
different," he said.

SmartCompany adds that Mr. Wade also said inconsistencies exist
within states, citing Victoria as an example where major sporting
events held in Melbourne's MCG can hold up to 75,000 patrons.

"You would think that would be more dangerous to the health of
Victorians than if you had 10,000 people in a live music event," he
said.

ALMBC is also calling on the government to establish travel permits
to ensure performers can cross state borders for work even if
border closures are in place due to the pandemic.

"Our artists do 80% of their work in states outside of the one they
live in, so we need to have an assurance that we can book shows and
national tours in August, September and October knowing that our
artists can travel to work," Mr. Wade said.

Overall, the ALMBC said a nation-wide commitment to 75% to 100%
capacity restrictions and a travel permit system would help the
industry overcome the greatest barriers it currently facing.




===================
B A N G L A D E S H
===================

PEOPLE'S LEASING: Recovers Only BDT30cr From Defaulters
-------------------------------------------------------
Dhaka Tribune reports that People's Leasing and Financial Services
(PLFS) has received only BDT30 crore from defaulters, a year and
nine months since the government approved liquidating the ailing
non-bank financial institution (NBFI).

Dhaka Tribune says the defaulters of PLFS have provided the amount
to the liquidator appointed by the High Court in mid-July of 2019.

"We received about BDT30 crore from the defaulters since July
2019," the report quotes PLFS liquidator Md Asaduzzaman Khan as
saying.

It is not possible to disburse the money to the depositors until a
larger amount is recovered, he added.  

The total outstanding loans of PLFS were BDT1,131 crore as of June
2018, which became defaulted as some of its former directors and
other borrowers took out the money in the name of loans, Dhaka
Tribune relates.

Defaulted loans of the NBFI stood at BDT1,900 crore with interest
as of December last year, Dhaka Tribune discloses citing an audited
report by the central bank.

According to Dhaka Tribune, the defaulters of PLFS did not return
the money for a long time, but the High Court recently summoned
them and ordered them to return the money to the liquidator, said
an official of the Bangladesh Bank (BB) directly involved in the
liquidation process.

As a result, some of the defaulters are returning the money to the
liquidator, he added.

Dhaka Tribune relates that the High Court on January 21 summoned
280 loan defaulters of PLFS and asked for an explanation from them
on why they were not returning the money they had taken out as
loans from the institution.

Then on March 17, former PLFS director Arefin Shamsul Alamin
returned BDT8.50 crore to the liquidator of PLFS.

Some other defaulters have promised to return the money as soon as
possible, BB officials said.

In July 2019, the Bangladesh Financial Intelligence Unit (BFIU)
ordered freezing all bank accounts and shares in the name of the
nine directors of PLFS, including Alamin, who were fired owing to
major irregularities. Besides, the High Court has also ordered a
travel ban on them.

The total amount of deposits of PLFS stand at about BDT2,500 crore,
as per the audited report. But it is still uncertain if the
depositors will get back their money, Dhaka Tribune states.

A total of 20 officials, including former PLFS officials, are
involved in the liquidation process. The liquidator spends BDT11
lakh every month to liquidate the institution.

On June 26, 2019, the finance ministry issued a directive that
allowed the Bangladesh Bank to go for liquidation of PLFS due to
the company's failure to pay back depositors' money, Dhaka Tribune
recalls.

It was the first liquidation in Bangladesh's financial sector in
line with the Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

PLFS is one of the four NBFIs from which rogue banker Proshanta
Kumar Halder, also known as PK Halder, swindled at least BDT3,500
crore.




=========
I N D I A
=========

AGARWALLA TIMBERS: ICRA Withdraws B+ Rating on INR6.0cr Loan
------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has withdrawn the ratings assigned to the bank facilities of
Agarwalla Timbers Private Limited at the request of the company and
based on the No Objection Certificate received from its banker.
However, ICRA does not have information to suggest that the credit
risk has changed since the time the rating was last reviewed.  

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Fund based-           6.00      [ICRA]B+ (Stable); ISSUER NOT
   Cash Credit                     COOPERATING; Withdrawn

   Non-Fund based-       0.02      [ICRA]A4; ISSUER NOT
   LG Limit                        COOPERATING; Withdrawn

   Non-fund based-      71.00      [ICRA]A4; ISSUER NOT
   LC & Buyer's                    COOPERATING; Withdrawn
   Credit Limit         

ATPL was incorporated in 1975 as a partnership firm, but was
converted to a private limited company in 1999. The company is in
the business of trading timber. It is promoted by Mr. Bhimsain Goel
and Mr. Subhash Chander Goel. The company's factory is in
Gandhidham, Gujarat and operates a total of 27 saw mills. The
company imports hardwood and softwood logs from various countries
like Malaysia, Solomon Island, Suriname and New Zealand. The sawn
timber is distributed from the company's offices in Nangloi in
Delhi, Ludhiana in Punjab, Bahadurgarh in Haryana, and 2 Gandhidham
in Gujarat. The timber sold by the company finds application in
furniture, construction work and packaging industry.

BANSIDHAR AGARWALLA: ICRA Keeps B- Ratings in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Bansidhar
Agarwalla & Co. Pvt Ltd Unit: Chinsurah Cold Storage in the 'Issuer
Not Cooperating' category. The ratings are denoted as
"[ICRA]B-(Stable) ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Working Capital      1.50       [ICRA]B-(stable); ISSUER NOT   
   Term Loan                       COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under the 'Issuer
                                   Not Cooperating' category

   Seasonal Cash        3.25       [ICRA]B-(stable); ISSUER NOT
   Credit                          COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under the 'Issuer
                                   Not Cooperating' category

   Working Capital      0.86       [ICRA]B-(stable); ISSUER NOT
   Loan                            COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under the 'Issuer
                                   Not Cooperating' category

   Bank Guarantee       0.17       [ICRA]B-(stable); ISSUER NOT
                                   COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under the 'Issuer
                                   Not Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

CCS, a cold storage unit of Bansidhar Agarwalla & Company Pvt. Ltd
was set up in 1963 in Chinsurah, in the Hooghly district of West
Bengal. CCS is primarily engaged in the business of storage and
preservation of potatoes and occasionally carries out trading of
potatoes as well. Currently, CCS has an annual storage capacity of
20,000 tonne.

DEVEURO PAPER: ICRA Removes D Rating from Issuer Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has removed its earlier rating of [ICRA]D from the 'ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING' category as Deveuro Paper Products LLP has now
submitted its 'No Default Statement' ("NDS") which validates that
the company is regular in meeting its debt servicing obligations.
The company's rating was moved to the 'ISSUER NOT COOPERATING'
category in April 2020.


EKAM AGRO: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating Category
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Ekam Agro
Private Limited in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The
rating is denoted as "[ICRA]B+(Stable)/[ICRA]A4 ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term-Fund       4.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Based/CC                        COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Long Term-Fund      11.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Based TL                        COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Long Term/           3.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable)/[ICRA]A4
   Short Term-                     ISSUER NOT COOPERATING; Rating
   Unallocated                     continues to remain under
                                   'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                   Category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

The company was incorporated in November 2013 by the Kalra Family
and is operating as a refinery for crude rice bran oil. The plant
is located in Mukstar, Punjab with an installed capacity of 100
tonnes per day. The operations of the company commenced from
February 2015. The total project cost incurred was INR17.51 crore
and was funded through promoter's contribution of around INR4
crores, unsecured loans of INR0.37 crore, term debt of INR11 crores
and INR2.14 crore of advances to suppliers.

EMPEE SUGARS: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Empee
Sugars and Chemicals Private Limited in the 'Issuer Not
Cooperating' category. The rating is denoted as "[ICRA] D/[ICRA] D
ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                    Amount
   Facilities     (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------     -----------    -------
   Term Loan         384.90      [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
                                 Rating continues to remain under
                                 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Cash Credit       127.14      [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
                                 Rating continues to remain under
                                 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Non fund-         128.18      [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   based                         Rating continues to remain under
                                 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Unallocated         0.78      [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
                                 Rating continues to remain under
                                 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

ESCL is engaged in the manufacturing of sugar and spirits including
ethanol. The Company started its cane crushing operation in 1992 at
Naidupet Unit in Andhra Pradesh and later ventured into the
production of Spirits namely rectified spirits and extra neutral
alcohol. ESCL has two operating units at Naidupet (Nellore) in
Andhrapradesh and Ambasamudram (Tirunelveli) in Tamil Nadu. ESCL
has 8000 TCD cane crushing capacity, integrated with 60 klpd
distillery and 50 MW cogeneration plant at Ambasamudram and 3000
TCD and 20 klpd distillery at Naidupet. ESCL also has a subsidiary
Empee Power Company Limited, which operates 20 MW cogeneration
power plant at Naidupet. Its Ambasamudram unit is facing cane
availability issues and the sugar production is discontinued.
Further, the 50 MW power co-gen plant also has stopped generation
of power since Dec. 1, 2014.

GANAPATI MOTORS: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Ganapati
Motors in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The rating is
denoted as "[ICRA]D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                    Amount
   Facilities     (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------     -----------    -------
   Fund based-        7.50       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Cash credit                   Rating continues to remain under
                                 the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 category

   Fund based        21.00       [ICRA]D; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Dealer                        Rating continues to remain under
   Financing Scheme              the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Established in 2004, Ganapati Motors (GM) is involved in the
automobile dealership business as an authorized dealer of Maruti
Suzuki India Limited in Bhilai, Chhattisgarh.

INDIA: Bad Loan Ruling Weighs as Banks Retreat Across Asia
----------------------------------------------------------
Suvashree Ghosh and Upmanyu Trivedi at Bloomberg News report that
India's Supreme Court allowed lenders to resume classifying
delinquent debt as bad loans, reversing a ruling that delayed
disclosure of soured credit in an economy already saddled with
stressed assets.

A three-judge panel headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan delivered the
verdict on March 23, supporting a request from the federal
government and central bank, which had sought to overturn a
September order that barred the categorization of loans as
non-performing, Bloomberg relates.

According to Bloomberg, the order will come as a relief for
investors who have been unable to gauge the impact of the pandemic
on asset quality of banks. Regulators had allowed a six-month
relaxation on classifying bad loans that was due to expire in
August before the court extended it.

The Reserve Bank of India expects that roughly 13% of outstanding
loans at local lenders could turn sour by September, which would be
the highest level since 1999.

The key index of Indian bank shares gained 0.8% after the decision,
compared with a 0.4% rise for the benchmark gauge.

"This will bolster banks' loan recovery efforts as defaulting
borrowers will now be tagged appropriately," Karthik Srinivasan,
senior vice-president and group head of financial sector ratings at
ICRA Ltd., the local arm of Moody‘s Investors Service, said ahead
of the ruling. "It will also help investors to be more clear about
the extent of bad loans, which was otherwise being reported under
proforma or potential bad loans."

The ruling also comes about a week before Indian companies can
resume filing for bankruptcy, a process that has been frozen over
the past year as part of pandemic-relief measures.


JAMPANA CONSTRUCTION: ICRA Keeps B+ Ratings in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Jampana
Construction Private Limited in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category. The rating is denoted as "[ICRA]B+ (Stable)/ [ICRA]A4
ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term-Fund      14.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Based/CC                        COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Long Term-Fund       7.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Based/TL                        COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Short Term-         94.00       [ICRA]A4 ISSUER NOT
   Non Fund Based                  COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Long Term/           1.50       [ICRA]B+ (Stable)/[ICRA]A4
   Short Term-                     ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Unallocated                     Rating continues to remain
                                   under 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                   category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Incorporated in 2003, Jampana Construction Private Limited (JCPL)
is a Bengaluru based civil contactor engaged in the construction of
commercial and residential buildings, bridges, hospitals, layout
development etc. JCPL undertakes direct as well as subcontracted
orders. The clientele of the Company includes, Hindustan Steelworks
Construction Limited (HSCL), National Building Construction
Corporation (NBCC), Karnataka Housing Board (KHB), Karnataka Road
Development Corporation Limited (KRDCL), Karnataka Health System
Development Research Projects (KHSDRP),Nagarjuna Construction
Company Limited (NCCL), Bangalore Development Authority (BDA),
Military Engineer Services (MES), Rashtriya Madhyamika Sikshana
Abhiyan (RMSA), RITES Limited, and other state and central
government agencies.

K S OILS: NCLAT Directs Liquidation of Edible Oil Company
---------------------------------------------------------
The Economic Times reports that the National Company Law Appellate
Tribunal (NCLAT) has directed to initiate liquidation process of
leading integrated edible oil company K S Oils Ltd and set aside an
NCLT order passed against it.  Terming it "unfortunate", the
appellate tribunal observed that even after the lapse of 981 days
and repeated compliance by the Resolution Professional to initiate
the liquidation process, the NCLT had not considered it.

A two-member NCLAT bench headed by Acting Chairperson Justice B L
Bhat allowed the appeal filed by the Resolution Professional (RP)
saying "fitness of situation" allows to initiate liquidation of the
corporate debtor K S Oils, ET relates.

"The Appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated January 1,
2021, passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) is set aside and
at the same time the order for initiation for liquidation of the
Corporate Debtor Ms. K.S.Oils Ltd is also allowed. The Corporate
Debtor - K S Oils shall liquidate in the manner as laid down in
Chapter-III of the Code," it said.

Earlier, on January 1, 2021, the Indore Bench of the National
Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had dismissed the application filed by
the RP of the debt-ridden company to initiate liquidation against K
S Oils after it could not attract a buyer within the permissible
time frame, ET recalls.

According to ET, the NCLT had rejected the RP's plea, after 981
days from the date of filing, terming it as "not maintainable and
being infructuous".

This was challenged by RP Kuldeep Verma before the NCLAT.

According to RP, NCLT after commencing 31 hearings over its
application to initiate liquidation from May 11, 2018, to January
1, 2021, dismissed it despite the mandatory 270 days for completing
insolvency had lapsed, ET relays.

The insolvency resolution process was initiated against K S Oils by
NCLT on July 21, 2017, over the plea filed by SREI, a financial
creditor.

SREI itself had submitted a Resolution Plan but was rejected by a
vote of 71.34 per cent, ET notes.


KAILASH TRADING: ICRA Lowers Rating on INR4cr LT Loan to D
----------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of Kailash
Trading Corporation (KTC), as:

                    Amount
   Facilities     (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------     -----------    -------
   Long term–         4.00       [ICRA]D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Cash Credit                   Rating downgraded from
                                 [ICRA]B (Stable) and Continues
                                 to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                 Cooperating' category

   Long term–         0.27       [ICRA]D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Term Loan                     Rating downgraded from
                                 [ICRA]B (Stable) and Continues
                                 to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                 Cooperating' category

   Short Term-        0.13       [ICRA]D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Fund Based                    Rating downgraded from
   Facilities                    [ICRA]B (Stable) and Continues
                                 to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                 Cooperating' category

   Short Term–        6.10       [ICRA]D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Non Fund Based                Rating downgraded from [ICRA]A4
   Facilities                    and Continues to remain under
                                 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 category

   Long Term/         4.50       [ICRA]D/[ICRA]D ISSUER NOT
   Short Term                    COOPERATING; Rating downgraded
   Unallocated                   from [ICRA]B(Stable)/[ICRA]A4
                                 and Continues to remain under
                                 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

Rationale

The rating downgrade reflects Delay in debt repayment as mentioned
in publicly available sources.  The rating is based on limited
information on the entity's performance since the time it was last
rated in December 2019. The lenders, investors and other market
participants are thus advised to exercise appropriate caution while
using this rating as the rating may not adequately reflect the
credit risk profile of the entity, despite the downgrade.

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Established in 2001, Kailash Trading Corporation (KTC) is primarily
engaged in trading of engineering polymers which includes
polyacetal, polycarbonate and hostaform of different grades and
these products find application in automobiles, electronic devices,
consumer appliances, ATM machines, printers etc. Apart from
engineering polymers, KTC also undertakes consignment sale of
commodity polymers for its principal – LG Polymers India Private
Limited, Vishakapatanam and sells to various customers.

KALYA CONSTRUCTIONS: ICRA Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Kalya
Constructions Private Limited in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category. The rating is denoted as "[ICRA]B (Stable) ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Fund based           6.00       [ICRA]B (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Term Loan                       COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Kalya Constructions Private Limited (KCPL) was incorporated in 2009
as a private limited company under Mr. Ram Kalya and family. Mr.
Ram Kalya has been acting as the managing director of the company
along with Mr. Om Prakash Kalya. The company acts as a civil
contractor for government, non-government and private entities.
KCPL primarily does mining, earthwork and pipeline work for the
entities. The company has also started trading activity of
construction raw materials.

KAYNES TECHNOLOGY: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Kaynes
Technology India Private Limited in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category. The rating is denoted as "[ICRA]D/[ICRA]D ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING".

                    Amount
   Facilities     (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------     -----------    -------
   Long term:         40.00      [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Fund based                    Rating continues to remain under
   facilities                    'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Long term:          7.95      [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Fund based                    Rating continues to remain under
   facilities                    'Issuer Not Cooperating'
   Term Loan                     Category

   Long term:        (28.00)     [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Interchangeable               Rating continues to remain under
                                 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Short term:        38.05      [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Fund based                    Rating continues to remain under
   facilities                    'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Short term:       (28.00)     [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Interchangeable               Rating continues to remain under
                                 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Kaynes Technology India Private Limited ("KTIPL") is a moderate
sized player in the Indian Electronics Manufacturing Services (EMS)
industry, primarily engaged in turnkey contracts for manufacturing
of circuit boards primarily for IT peripherals, industrial
controls, rail signaling, telecom, energy, medical, automobiles,
defense verticals for customers namely Seimens, Invensys Rail
India, Ansaldo, Larsen & Tubro, Bharat Electronics, Kone Elevator
to name a few. Established in 1988 as a sole proprietorship with a
single unit at Mysore, KTIPL was converted into a private limited
Company in 2008. Further, the Company has also been frequently
expanding its operations with the addition of new units to cater to
the increase in volumes on the back of entry into newer segments.

MALHATI TEA: ICRA Keeps B- Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Malhati
Tea & Industries Limited in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.
The ratings are denoted as "[ICRA]B-(Stable)/ [ICRA]A4 ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Fund based           0.89       [ICRA]B-(Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Term Loan                       COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Fund based           6.46       [ICRA]B-(Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Unallocated                     COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Fund based           2.50       [ICRA]B-(Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Working                         COOPERATING; Rating continues
   Capital                         to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Non-Fund             0.15       [ICRA]A4 ISSUER NOT
   based Working                   COOPERATING; Rating continues
   Capital                         to remain under the 'Issuer
                                   Not Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Malhati Tea & Industries Limited was acquired by the present
management in 2010-11 from the erstwhile promoters. MTIPL has a tea
garden in the Jalpaiguri district of West Bengal, with a total area
of around 463.47 hectares under plantation. The total production
capacity of MTIL is around 14 lac kg of tea.

MARUTI NUTRIMENT: ICRA Withdraws B Rating on INR2.50cr Loan
-----------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has withdrawn the rating assigned to the unallocated limits of
Maruti Nutriment Products at the request of the firm and in
accordance with ICRA's policy on withdrawal of rating of bank
facilities. However, ICRA does not have information to suggest that
the credit risk has changed since the last rating exercise. The Key
Rating Drivers, Liquidity Position, Rating Sensitivities, Key
financial indicators have not been captured as the rated instrument
is being withdrawn. The previous detailed rating rationale is
available at the following link: click here

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Unallocated
   Limit                 2.50      [ICRA]B (Stable); Withdrawn

Maruti Nutriment Products was established in January 2020 as a
partnership firm by Mr. Manoranjan Samuel and Mr. Mahendra Kumar
Sutar, based in Cuttack, Odisha. The firm has been set up to carry
out exports of agricultural products.


MIZORAM ISPAT: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Mizoram
Ispat Industries in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The
ratings are denoted as "[ICRA]B+(Stable)/[ICRA]A4 ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Fund based           4.25       [ICRA]B+(Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Cash Credit                     COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Fund based          20.00       [ICRA]B+(Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Term Loans                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Unallocated          0.75       [ICRA]B+(Stable)/[ICRA]A4
   Limit                           ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
                                   Rating continues to remain
                                   under the 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

MII was established as a partnership firm in 2010 and had set up an
ingot and TMT bar manufacturing plant in Mizoram. The plant was
commissioned in July 2012. In FY2016, the firm added a wire rod
manufacturing facility. The promoters also have interests in the
cement and infrastructure industries.

MM INTERNATIONAL: ICRA Lowers Rating on INR21.50cr Loan to D
------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has revised the ratings on certain bank facilities of MM
International, as:

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term–           15.04      [ICRA]D; downgraded from
   Term Loan                       [ICRA]BB- (Stable)

   Long Term–           21.50      [ICRA]D; downgraded from  
   Fund Based/CC                   [ICRA]BB- (Stable)

   Long Term/            3.46      [ICRA]D/[ICRA]D; downgraded
   Short term–                     from [ICRA]BB-(Stable)/
   Unallocated                     [ICRA]A4

Rationale

The rating downgrade factors in MM International's constrained
liquidity position on account of its exposure to a Group entity
involved in the construction business, leading to delays in debt
servicing. ICRA notes that MM International was the primary
borrower for a loan against property (LAP) in which two of the
partners – Mr. Rajesh Vora and Mr. Ram Vora are the coborrowers,
and on which facility there were debt servicing irregularities. The
proceeds from the LAP facility were on-lend to the Group
construction entity to meet its business needs.

Further, the ratings are constrained by MMI's modest scale of
operations with an operating income (OI) of INR67.47 crore
registered in FY2020, which limits its competitive position. The
ratings remain constrained by MMI's concentrated customer base with
top two customers contributing to over 40% of its revenues during
the last three years. The ratings take into account the firm's
leveraged capital structure with a gearing of 1.71 times as on
March 31, 2020, led by modest net worth position and high debt
levels. The ratings remain constrained by the limited value
addition involved in its operations, which, along with intense
competition in the spice processing industry, restricts its pricing
flexibility. Being a net exporter, the profitability is exposed to
significant foreign exchange (forex) risk, though the same is
mitigated to the extent of forward contracts booked by the firm.

The ratings factor in the susceptibility of its revenues and
profitability to commodity price fluctuations, which are influenced
by external factors such as agro-climatic conditions, adverse
changes in Government policies related to exports/imports of
commodities, export incentives/duty structure, among others. ICRA
notes the risks inherent in a partnership concern, including the
risk of any substantial capital withdrawal by the partners.

The ratings, however, continue to factor in the established track
record of the promoters of MM International (MMI) in the spice
industry spanning over three decades and the low product
concentration, with its top five products contributing 37% to the
total revenues in FY2020. The ratings draw comfort from MMI's
diversified geographical presence with exports to countries such as
the UK, Australia, Spain, Canada, the US, and so on.

Key rating drivers and their description

Credit challenges

* Constrained liquidity position due to exposure to Group entity,
leading to delays in debt servicing: MM International has defaulted
in the LAP loan taken by the firm, which it has been further
on-lend to its Group's construction business, which is run by the
brothers Mr. Rajesh Vora and Mr. Ram Vora. The delays in EMI
payment was primarily due to the pandemic-related business
challenges encountered by the Group's construction business.

* Weak competitive position due to modest scale of operations:
MMI's scale of operations has remained modest over the years with
an OI of INR69.63 crore and INR67.47 crore registered in FY2019 and
FY2020, respectively. As a result, the firm's competitive position
remains weak. Nonetheless in FY2021, MMI has been experiencing
improved demand for its products and has been able to run its
operations during the lockdown as the products come under the
essential goods category. As a result, it registered healthy sales
of INR46.24 crore in H1 FY2021.

* Leveraged capital structure due to weak net worth levels and high
debt: The firm's total debt consists of a term loan, a working
capital loan from the bank and interest-bearing unsecured loans.
The capital structure remained highly leveraged with gearing of
1.71 times, led by its high working capital loan of INR17.79 crore
as on March 31, 2020. The high debt resulted in a weak Total
Debt/OPBDIT ratio of 6.12 times in FY2020.

* Modest profitability in spice processing, vulnerable to commodity
price fluctuations and forex fluctuations: Limited value addition
involved in the firm's operations, which, along with intense
competition in the spice processing industry, restricts its pricing
flexibility. High depreciation charges and interest expenses have
further put pressure on the firm's profitability over the years.
Moreover, being a net exporter, MMI's profitability remains
vulnerable to fluctuations in commodity prices and foreign exchange
rates. It reported net profit margins (NPM) of 5.52% in FY2020
(provisional) against a net loss of 0.84% in FY2019 owing to a
decline in interest expenses led by debt prepayment, a conversion
of the term loan to foreign currency term loan and lower working
capital utilization, coupled with the decrease in depreciation
charges. The NPM was also supported by non-operating income in the
form of income from the sale of property in FY2020.

* High customer concentration risk; however, widespread network of
retail chains in international markets mitigates the risk to an
extent: MMI's customer base consists of retailers and traders, who
supply ingredients to food manufacturers. The credit period offered
to the customers ranges from nil to 90 days. The firm's customer
base is highly concentrated with the top two customers contributing
to over 40% of the total revenues from FY2018-FY2020. However, the
fact that its customers have an established network of retail
stores in the international markets mitigates the risk to an
extent.

* Risk of capital withdrawal inherent in partnership firm: Given
MMI's constitution as a limited liability partnership firm, it is
exposed to discrete risks, including the possibility of capital
withdrawal by the partners and the risk of dissolution of the firm
upon the death, retirement or insolvency of the partners.

Credit strengths

* Established track record of promoters in spices industry: MMI was
incorporated in 1997 and its operations are being managed by the
Mumbai-based Vora family. The promoters have experience of over 30
years in the spice industry, enabling MMI to establish its position
in the market.

* Low product concentration risk and diversified geographical
presence: MMI trades in over 150 spices, blended spices and
food products. Although turmeric, chilli powder, cumin and
coriander form its core products, the top five products contributed
~37% to the revenues in FY2020, indicating low product
concentration risk. Further, the firm has a diversified
geographical presence with exports to countries such as the UK,
Australia, Spain, Canada and the US, among others. The firm's
liquidity is poor owing to modest cash flow from operations,
moderate debt repayments, and funding commitments to weaker Group
entities.

Rating sensitivities

Positive factors – Sustained track record of timely debt
servicing would lead to an upgrade in the rating

Negative factors – NA

MM International was established in 1997 by the Vora family, which
is involved in spice trading for the last 100 years. The firm
processes spices and exports them to international markets. MMI
trades in over 150 products, exporting them to different countries
(such as New Zealand, Australia, Japan, South Korea, Belgium,
England, Italy, the US and Canada). However, it primarily trades in
four major spices (coriander, turmeric, cumin and chilli powder),
which contribute to most of its revenues.

As per FY2020 provisional estimates, MMI reported a net profit of
INR3.72 crore on an OI of INR67.47 crore, against a net loss of
INR(0.59) crore on an OI of INR69.63 crore in the previous year.

NABADIGANT EDUCATIONAL: ICRA Keeps B+ Ratings in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Nabadigant
Educational Trust in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.  The
ratings are denoted as "[ICRA]B+(Stable) ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Fund based          15.00       [ICRA]B+(Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Limit-Term                      COOPERATING; Rating continues
   Loan                            to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Fund based–         4.95        [ICRA]B+(Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Corporate                       COOPERATING; Rating continues
   Mortgage                        to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Fund based          0.05       [ICRA]B+(Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Unallocated                     COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

NDET is a charitable trust, established in 1997, with an aim to
impart higher education in India. The trust manages five colleges,
located at Bhubaneswar, Odisha, offering courses across various
streams like engineering, information technology, management and
media under the brand name "Koustuv Group of Institutions".


PRAKASH OFFSET: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Prakash
Offset Printers in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The
rating is denoted as "[ICRA]B+(Stable) ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term-Fund       4.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Based/CC                        COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Long Term-Fund       3.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Based/TL                        COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Long Term-Fund       2.50       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Unallocated                     COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Promoted by Mr. P Mohandas Nayak and his family in 1983, Prakash
Offset Printers was initially engaged in printing labels for an
associate concern, Prakash Beedies Pvt. Ltd. However, subsequently,
the firm entered the commercial offset printing business and is
currently engaged in printing books, leaflets, posters, banners,
brochures, and magazines, as well as in postpress activities
including pinning, binding, lamination and other finishing jobs.
POP houses imported advanced Heidelberg printing equipment for
undertaking printing in a variety of sizes—including 14" x 20",
18" x 23" and 28" x 40"—as well as a digital printing machine.
The firm currently operates from a single printing facility in
Mangalore, Karnataka, catering to customers across Goa, Karnataka
and Kerala.

RAMAN AGRO: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
---------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Raman Agro
Exports Pvt ltd in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The
rating is denoted as "[ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Fund based           4.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Cash Credit                     COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Fund based           6.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Term Loan                       COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Established in 2008, RAEPL manufactures cattle feed at its
manufacturing facilities located at Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh (UP)
and Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, with a total manufacturing capacity of
200 tonnes per day, with the Varanasi plant being automated in all
stages of production, from the feeding of raw material to the
packing of the finished product. RAEPL sells its products through
distributors in Bihar, Jharkhand, UP, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha
under the brand names, 'Doodh Dhara' and 'Kranti'.

RLJ MULTIGRAIN: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
-------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of RLJ
Multigrain Private Limited in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category. The ratings are denoted as "[ICRA]B(Stable) ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Fund based           6.50       [ICRA]B(Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Cash Credit                     COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Fund based           5.50       [ICRA]B(Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Term Loan                       COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

RLJ Multigrain Private Limited was originally incorporated as a
partnership firm M/s Swastik Udyog. Subsequently, the promoters
reconstituted the company as a private limited entity in 2012. The
company is promoted by Jain family based out of Kolkata and the
unit has rice milling annual capacity of 63,000 tons.

SRAVANTHI ENERGY: ICRA Keeps D Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Sravanthi
Energy Private Limited in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category.

                    Amount
   Facilities     (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------     -----------    -------
   Long Term         633.75      [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Fund based-                   Rating continues to remain under
   Term Loan                     'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

   Long Term-         50.00      [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Non fund-based                Rating continues to remain under
                                 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                 Category

The rating is denoted as "[ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING"

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

SEPL is developing a 2*225 MW gas-based power project in two phases
(Phase-I and Phase-II) at Udham Singh Nagar district In Uttarakhand
state of India. Land has been fully acquired and all clearances are
in place. The total project cost is to be funded in a debt equity
ratio of 3:1. The combined cycle for Phase-I of the project was
completed in March 2012.

SVS CONSTRUCTIONS: ICRA Keeps B Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Svs
Constructions in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The rating
is denoted as "[ICRA]B (Stable) ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term-           25.00      [ICRA]B (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Unallocated                     COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

M/s SVS Constructions was incorporated in the year 2012 as a
partnership firm with Mr. R Rajasekhar Reddy and Mrs. R Laksmi
Prasanna as partners. The entity is into the business of real
estate development and has completed four residential projects in
Bangalore since its inception. The promoters have long experience
in the field of real estate development and construction through
other group concerns. Presently, the company is engaged in
execution of a residential apartment project, "Trend square
Precioso" at Kalkere, Horamavu, Bangalore. Started in August 2016,
the project is spread across 1.82 acres of land parcel and houses
140 apartments with an aggregate super built up area of 1,57,035
sqft.

TRIDENT SUGARS: ICRA Keeps C Debt Ratings in Not Cooperating
------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Trident
Sugars Limited in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The rating
is denoted as [ICRA] C ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                    Amount
   Facilities    (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------    -----------    -------
   Cash Credit       28.00      [ICRA]C ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
                                Rating continues to remain
                                under 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                category

   Term Loan        13.95       [ICRA]C ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
                                Rating continues to remain
                                under 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
                                category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Trident Sugars Limited commenced its operation as a cooperative
mill and was acquired by Ganapati Sugar Mills in 2002. TSL was then
acquired by Rajshree Sugars and Chemicals Limited in 2006, further
it was subsequently acquired by Natems Sugar Private Limited (NSPL)
in April 2017 and now is a 100% subsidiary of NSPL. The standalone
sugar mill of TSL, having crushing capacity of 2500 tons of cane
per day, is located in Zaheerabad Tq. of Andhra Pradesh.

TRIVENI ENTERPRISES: ICRA Keeps B+ Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Triveni
Enterprises in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The rating is
denoted as "[ICRA]B+(Stable) ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                     Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term-Fund       6.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Based/CC                        COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Triveni Enterprises (Triveni) was established by late Mr. O. P.
Agarwal in 1968 to engage in the trading of iron andsteel products.
Currently, the firm is owned and managed by his wife Mrs. Suchita
Agarwal and his son Mr.Ashirwad Agarwal. The firm buys and sells
products ranging from angles, beams, channels, squares, rounds,
flats,plates, sheets etc which are extensively used in
construction, automobile and engineering segment. The firm
alsoprovides various services like slitting, cutting, de-coiling
and straightening at its warehousing facility located at Bangalore
(Karnataka) spread across 17 acres of land. The firm is ISO
9001:2008 certified.


URBANEDGE HOTELS: ICRA Reaffirms C+ Rating on INR6cr Term Loan
--------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has reaffirmed ratings on certain bank facilities of Urbanedge
Hotels Private Limited (UHPL), as:

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Fund based           6.00       [ICRA]C+; reaffirmed
   Term Loan          
             
Rationale

The rating considers UHPL's weak financial profile, which is
characterised by higher debt levels in relation to its current
scale of operations and operating/net losses since inception, and
stretched coverage indicators.  Given the losses, the company
requires periodical fund infusion from its private equity (PE)
investor, Apollo Global LLC, towards fulfilling its debt
obligations. From April 2013 to YTD FY2021, the PE investor has
infused ~INR350.9 crore, for loss funding and towards debt
repayments. The fund infusion has largely remained timely, barring
a two-month period in October–November 2017, wherein there was a
delay owing to the disqualification of the board, pending
submission of financial statements for the period FY2014–FY2017.
UHPL appointed third-party financial advisors in July 2015 to
review the company's financial transactions and provide accounting
and advisory services, which helped in streamlining its accounting
and internal controls. The company witnessed a steep decline in
revenues in H1 FY2021 to INR1.9 crore (INR30.5 crore in H1 FY2020),
owing to the sharp fall in occupancies post the onset of the
Covid-19 pandemic. To tide over the liquidity stress, the company
had initially availed moratorium for the period of March–August
2020. Post that, UHPL applied for a loan restructuring relief under
the resolution framework for pandemic-related stress specified by
the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

ICRA notes that the restructuring proposal was not invoked by the
lender and the same was communicated to the company on December 28,
2020. However, when the proposal lapsed as on December 28, 2020,
the company's debt servicing was timely and there were no overdues.
UHPL had cleared all the principal and interest obligations for the
period of March 2020–December 2020, using the proceeds from the
sale of its property at Ahmedabad, Gujarat; the debt outstanding on
its books is INR49.7 crore as on January 31, 2021. Additionally,
the company has received in principle sanction of INR15.0 crore of
working capital term loan (20% of its outstanding debt as on
February 29, 2020), under Guaranteed Emergency Credit Line 2.0
scheme (GECL 2.0) from its lender, which is expected to support the
debt repayments in the near term.

UHPL's three hotels have locational advantage by virtue of being in
proximity to large business parks in Chennai, Bangalore and
Coimbatore. This can help the hotels to attract corporate
customers. The company's strategy to focus on corporate customers
is expected to drive improvement in occupancy over the longer term.
Further, in line with the industry, UHPL's revenues and margins are
exposed to industry cyclicality, economic cycles and exogenous
risks. Going forward, the company's ability to service its debt
obligations on a timely basis remains dependent on the timely
infusion of funds by its investors.

Key rating drivers and their description

Credit strengths

* Periodic fund infusions from PE investor supports debt servicing:
The company is yet to achieve break-even at the operating level and
requires constant financial support. The PE investor, who currently
holds a 98.33% stake in the company, has infused ~Rs. 350.9 crore
over the past eight years (since April 1, 2013 till January 31,
2021) for loss funding and towards servicing of debt obligations.
With the company's accruals likely to remain under pressure in the
near term, timely equity infusions from the PE investors will be
critical for repayment of principal and interest obligations going
forward.

* Strategic location of hotels in areas of its operations likely to
support future occupancy: UHPL's hotel properties are strategically
located near business/information technology parks, airport, etc.,
attracting corporate customers (which contributed to over ~50% of
the FY2020 revenues for the company) and business travellers. The
company's flagship property at Whitefield, Bangalore (which
contributed to ~40% of the revenues in FY2020) reported occupancy
of ~60–70% in FY2018–FY2020, owing to the higher demand in the
region. The company's overall occupancy is at present low at ~4%
(H1 FY2021), given the steep fall in the demand amid the pandemic
and the company' high dependence on the IT sector for two of its
properties (in Chennai and Bangalore). Nevertheless, its strategy
to focus on corporate customers is expected to drive improvement in
occupancy over the longer term.

Credit challenge

* Financial profile characterised by stretched coverage indicators
and insufficient cash flows from operations to meet debt
obligations: The company's revenues witnessed a sharp deterioration
to INR1.9 crore in H1 FY2021 vis-à-vis INR30.5 crore in H1 FY2020,
owing to the steep fall in occupancies amid the pandemic. UHPL has
been incurring operating and net losses since its inception in
FY2007. The company's operating cash flows are not sufficient to
meet the term loan obligations (both interest and principal),
resulting in negative debt coverage indicators. UHPL had availed
moratorium for the period March–August 2020; the interest and
principal obligations during the moratorium period would be paid at
the end of the loan tenor along with the last instalment. UHPL had
met all the principal and interest obligations (INR37.2 crore) for
the period September–January 2021 from the proceeds arising from
the sale of its property at Ahmedabad, Gujarat and the current debt
outstanding on its books is INR49.7 crore. Despite reduction in the
debt levels, UHPL is highly leveraged with debt at unsustainable
levels, given the current scale of operations. The company's
coverage indicators are expected to remain stretched going
forward.

* Past delays in debt servicing; however, UHPL has been regular in
payments since then: UHPL's term loans were restructured in 2012,
consequent to delays in meeting the debt obligations. Since April
2015, the company has been regular in meeting the term loan
obligations with continued equity infusions from PE investors.
There were temporary delays in repayment of term loan during
October–November 2017 due to disqualification of directors by the
Ministry of Corporate Affairs for delay in filing of financial
statements. Subsequently, the company has been regular in debt
servicing.

* Vulnerability of revenues to inherent industry cyclicality and
economic cycles: The hotel industry is highly cyclical, with
performance heavily dependent on the general economic performance
and extent of global travel, apart from exogenous shocks. Any
weakness in macro-economics in the key source markets and in India
will drive down the travel into the market, thus adversely
affecting the performance of the hotel industry.

Liquidity position: Poor

The company's liquidity has remained poor with net losses since its
inception, resulting in negative cash flow from operations.
Including the anticipated drawdown of INR15.0 crore of GECL, the
company is expected to have repayment obligations of INR22.8 crore,
INR21.4 crore and INR3.8 crore in FY2022, FY2023 and FY2024,
respectively. With insufficient cash flow from operations to meet
the interest and principal obligations, the same is expected to be
carried out through equity infusion by the private equity investor.
The company had cash and liquid investments of ~Rs. 1.4 crore as on
September 30, 2020. Going forward, UHPL has no major capex plans.
The equity infusions from the PE investors will be critical in
meeting the debt obligations going forward.

Rating sensitivities

Positive factors – Substantial improvement in the credit profile
of the company, with reduction in debt levels and sustained
serviceability of the debt obligations from its operational cash
flows could trigger a rating upgrade.

Negative factors – Further weakening in liquidity in the absence
of timely and adequate support from the investors could lead to a
downgrade of the company's rating.

UHPL was incorporated in 2006 as a special purpose vehicle (SPV)
between Auromatrix Hotels Private Limited (Auromatrix 1.67% stake)
and CPI (India) Private Limited (CPI). CPI, a fund managed by
Apollo Global Management LLC1 , owns a 98.33% stake in UHPL.
Auromatrix was promoted by Mr. Kumaran Sitaraman in 2002 to
develop, operate and manage hotels. UHPL owns three hotels, one
each in Chennai (Old Mahabalipuram Road IT Expressway), Bangalore
(Whitefield) and Coimbatore (Singanallur) with a total inventory of
462 rooms. In December 2020, the company sold its hotel at
Ahmedabad (SG Road) for a total consideration of INR67.5 crore.
Auromatrix has developed the hotels and currently manages the same
under a franchisee agreement of the four-star upscale brand Aloft,
owned by the Marriot Hotels Group. In FY2020, the company incurred
a net loss of INR33.1 crore on an operating income (OI) of INR61.6
crore compared with net loss of INR35.8 crore on an OI of INR61.8
crore in FY2019.

VENSON ELECTRIC: ICRA Keeps B+ on INR3cr Debt in Not Cooperating
----------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Venson
Electric Pvt Ltd in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The
rating is denoted as "[ICRA]B+ (Stable)/[ICRA]A4 ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING".

                      Amount
   Facilities       (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------       -----------    -------
   Long Term-Fund       3.00       [ICRA]B+ (Stable) ISSUER NOT
   Based/CC                        COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

   Short Term-          9.00       [ICRA]A4 ISSUER NOT
   Non-Fund Based                  COOPERATING; Rating continues
                                   to remain under 'Issuer Not
                                   Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Venson was established as a proprietorship concern in 1973. Later
in 2000, it was converted into a private limited company.  The
company is engaged in manufacturing control and relay panel boards
for generations, transmissions and distribution switchgear
equipments. The company has an installed manufacturing capacity of
200 panels per month at its Peenya facility in Bangalore,
Karnataka. VEPL is a closely held company owned and managed by Mr.
M. V. Satyanarayanaand his family. The company is ISO 9001:2008
certified.

VISHNUSHIVA INFRA: ICRA Keeps D Debt Rating in Not Cooperating
--------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of
Vishnushiva Infrastructures in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating'
category. The rating is denoted as "[ICRA]D ISSUER NOT
COOPERATING".

                    Amount
   Facilities    (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------    -----------    -------
   Fund based-       10.00      [ICRA] D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   Cash Credit                  Rating continues to remain under
                                'Issuer Not Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

Established in March 2008, Vishnushiva Infrastructures (VI) is a
partnership firm engaged in overburden removal, coal excavation
contract and road excavation contracts. The firm is majorly
involved in sub-contract and joint venture work for Sadbhav
Engineering Ltd. The firm is promoted by Mr. Birendra Rana and
other family member.


WOOLWAYS (INDIA): ICRA Keeps D on INR10cr Debt in Not Cooperating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ICRA has retained the ratings for the bank facilities of Woolways
(India) Limited in the 'Issuer Not Cooperating' category. The
rating is denoted as "[ICRA]D/D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING".

                    Amount
   Facilities    (INR crore)    Ratings
   ----------    -----------    -------
   Long/Short-      10.00       [ICRA]D/D ISSUER NOT COOPERATING;
   term Fund                    Rating continues to remain under
   based                        'Issuer Not Cooperating' category

ICRA has been trying to seek information from the entity so as to
monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests by ICRA, the
entity's management has remained non-cooperative. The current
rating action has been taken by ICRA basis best available/dated/
limited information on the issuers' performance. Accordingly, the
lenders, investors and other market participants are advised to
exercise appropriate caution while using this rating as the rating
may not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the entity.
The rating action has been taken in accordance with ICRA's policy
in respect of non-cooperation by a rated entity available at
www.icra.in.

WIL was incorporated in 1994 as a public limited company. It is
engaged in the manufacturing of readymade garments from its two
manufacturing facilities at Ludhiana, Punjab. The company is
promoted by Mr. Rakesh Nayar and his wife, Mrs. Babita Nayar, who
have over three decades of experience in readymade garment
manufacturing. The company has its own brands for children's wear,
'Unikid'. The company also manufactures knitting garments for other
players. WIL markets its product through its 21 retail outlets
spread across northern and central India. WIL also has tie-ups with
online aggregators for marketing and selling its products online.
The company derives around 15-20% of its revenues from exports to
Middle Eastern markets, such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab
Emirates (UAE), as well as to China.




=====================
P H I L I P P I N E S
=====================

PHILIPPINE TELEGRAPH: Seeks Reversal of Approved Capital Hike
-------------------------------------------------------------
BusinessWorld Online reports that Philippine Telegraph & Telephone
Corp. (PT&T) is asking the SEC to reverse its approved capital
hike.

In a disclosure to the exchange on March 22, PT&T said its board of
directors decided to propose a reversal of the authorized capital
increase previously sought to accommodate the conversion of debts
to equity under PT&T's rehabilitation plan, BusinessWorld relays.

"Considering the nature of the documentary requirements imposed by
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in converting the
debts to equity, PT&T deems it proper to first address the said
documentary requirements before implementing any debt-to-equity
conversion and increase in its authorized capital," the company
explained.

BusinessWorld relates that PT&T said the proposal will not affect
the company's rehabilitation plan.

"The debt-to-equity conversion mandated under the rehabilitation
plan will still be implemented by PT&T, but the same will be done
in several tranches or every time PT&T completes the documentary
requirements imposed by the SEC," the company said.

Makati City-based Philippine Telegraph & Telephone Corporation --
http://www.ptt.com.ph/-- operates a telecommunication network. The
Company also offers basic telephone and long distance services,
digital data and other data communication services, and a variety
of other products.


PHOENIX PETROLEUM: Plans Asset Sale, Transfer to Manage Debts
-------------------------------------------------------------
BusinessWorld Online reports that the board of directors of Dennis
A. Uy-led Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc. has given management
the go signal to unload certain corporate assets for its debt
management activities.

In a disclosure to the exchange on March 23, the company said
transactions will cover the "transfer, sale, mortgage or
disposition of certain corporate properties, assets, or
investments" that may be relevant to the success of the company's
financial management program, BusinessWorld relays.

According to BusinessWorld, Phoenix Petroleum's management has been
authorized to enter negotiations "under reasonable and acceptable
terms and conditions advantageous to the corporation" with any
interested entity.

BusinessWorld relates that the board decision comes a day after the
company told the stock exchange that the company or any of its
subsidiaries "is open to consider any investor willing to invest
and believes in the operations [of Phoenix Petroleum] and can
further add value to its business activities."

It said that such offers are nothing new to the company and that it
had been open to investors who believe in its core business and can
bring in value to its operations, finances, and to its
shareholders.

"We see these as opportunities for growth," it said.

But Phoenix Petroleum said that the dilution of its shareholdings
had not been a subject of any discussion at any level in the
company.

Last week, Davao-based businessman Mr. Uy sold off the entire stake
of Chelsea Logistics and Infrastructure Holdings Corp. in 2GO
Group, Inc. worth around 31.73% of shares to SM Investments Corp.
at PHP8.50 apiece, the report adds.

Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc. is engaged in the marketing and
distribution of petroleum products on a wholesale and retail basis
as well as the operation of gas stations, oil depots, storage
facilities and allied services.




=================
S I N G A P O R E
=================

MASTERPRO HARDWARE: Creditors' Meetings Set for April 5
-------------------------------------------------------
Masterpro Hardware Pte Ltd will hold a meeting for its creditors on
April 5, 2021, at 3:00 p.m., via electronic means.

Agenda of the meeting includes:

   a. to present a Statement of the Company's affairs showing
      in respect of assets the method and manner in which the
      valuation of the assets was arrived at, together with a
      list of the creditors and the estimated amount of the
      claims;
   b. to consider the nomination of the Liquidator for the
      Company and on the appointment of Mr. Jonathan Ong
      Shyue Wen as the Liquidator of the Company;

   c. to consider the appointment of a Committee of Inspection
      pursuant to Section 169(1) of the Insolvency, Restructuring
      and Dissolution Act 2018;

   d. consider the appointment of solicitors to assist the
      Liquidator in his duties; and

   e. consider any other matter which may properly be brought
      before the meeting.

The Provisional Liquidator is:

         Jonathan Ong Shyue Wen
         Krys & Associates Singapore Pte Ltd
         60 Paya Lebar Road
         #11-37 Paya Lebar Square
         Singapore 409051
         Email: Jonathan.Ong@krys-global.com


OCAP MANAGEMENT: Court Enters Wind-Up Order
-------------------------------------------
The High Court of Singapore entered an order on March 15, 2021, to
wind up the operations of Ocap Management Pte Ltd.

Wirecard Acquiring and Issuing GMBH and Wirecard AG filed the
petition against the company.

The company's liquidators are:

         Mr. Cameron Duncan
         Mr. David Kim
         KordaMentha Pte. Ltd.
         16 Collyer Quay #30-01
         Singapore 049318



                           *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter-Asia Pacific is a daily newsletter co-
published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marites O. Claro, Joy A. Agravante, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez,
Julie Anne L. Toledo, Ivy B. Magdadaro and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2021.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9482.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding,
electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited
without prior written permission of the publishers.
Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed
to be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

TCR-AP subscription rate is US$775 for 6 months delivered via e-
mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance
thereof are US$25 each.  For subscription information, contact
Peter Chapman at 215-945-7000.



                *** End of Transmission ***