260728.mbx

260728.mbx C L A S S A C T I O N R E P O R T E R Tuesday, July 28, 2026, Vol. 28, No. 149 Headlines 5975 SUNSET LLC: Pardo Sues Over Discriminative Property 7-ELEVEN INC: Walsh Suit Removed to C.D. California A & M ENGINEERING: Huerta Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ABC PHONES: Fails to Secure Clients' Private Info, Daffin Suit Says ABUILT CONSTRUCTION: Lopez Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages ACCRUE FINANCE INC: Trikakis Files Suit in S.D. California ADAPTHEALTH CORP: Fails to Protect Personal Info, McCall Says AES RESTAURANTS: Foster Balks at Property's Architectural Barriers ALBERTSON'S LLC: Serna Wage-and-Hour Suit Removed to W.D. Wash. ALL WORK TRAVEL: Herring Files TCPA Suit in E.D. California AMERICAN ADDICTION: M.C. Sues Over Google's Access to Health Info AMERICAN BOARD OF PREVENTATIVE: Blaney Files Suit in N.D. Ill. AMERICAN EAGLE: Davidson Suit Removed to W.D. Washington AMERICAN WATER: Bradford Consumer Suit Removed to E.D. Cal. ANTHEM TAX SERVICES: Cordero Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ANTHROPOLOGIE INC: Park Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime APRO LLC: Villa Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. AS MANAGER LLC: Whitlock Files FCRA Suit in D. South Carolina ASD SLEEP LLC: Dovbgerg Files Suit in E.D. Pennsylvania ASP ISOTOPES: Class Settlement in Leone Suit Gets Initial Nod AT&T INC: Scott Seeks Prelim Approval of Class Settlement BANK OF AMERICA: Quashal of Subpoena to Third Party Sought BELEAF MEDICAL: Donham Sues Over Improper Tip Pooling BETTERMENT LLC: Automatically Swept Uninvested Cash, Treadway Says BILLINGS CLINIC: Brester Files Suit in D. Montana BLUE TEAL: Faces Moser Personal Injury Suit in N.D. Tex. BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL: Adkins Sues Over Defective Jet Boats BRIDGEPOINT SERVICES: Faces Brennan Suit in S.D. Fla. BROWNS TIRE: Baldridge Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages BSS MONITORING CORP: Trimble Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. CADILLAC PASADENA: Castro Seeks to Recover Regular, Overtime Pay CALIFORNIA FOOD: Herrera Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. CAMBRIAN HOMECARE: Mathews Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. CANDID MAVEN: Gamez Sues Over Unlawful Spam E-mails CARGOMATIC INC: Duran Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. CATALYST BRANDS: Faces Teles-Rosario Suit in E.D. Tex. CENTRIC BRANDS: Dalton Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind CHINA INTERNATIONAL: Sued Over Shipping Container Monopoly CIDER INC: Kaslofsky Files TCPA Suit in C.D. California COACHELLA MUSIC: Uses Trap & Trace on Website, Haviland Alleges COFFEE COUNTY, TN: Ashley Sues Over 1st & 14th Amendment Violations COLORADO REHABILITATION: Faces Cooper Suit Over Compromised Info CONSUMER 2.0 INC: Faces Hernandez Employment Suit in Cal. Super. COZZIA USA: Faces Vasquez Employment Suit in Cal. Super. CRCD ENTERPRISES: Linear Sues Over Unpaid Wages CROWN CORK: Faces Ortiz Suit Over Unfair Tobacco Surcharges CUROLOGY INC: Powell Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website CYMBIOTIKA LLC: Powell Balks at Blind-Inaccessible Website DEUTSCHE BANK: Loses Bid to Junk Amended Securities Suit Complaint EAT REAL: Underpays Restaurant Staff, Linares Suit Claims ECOBAT RESOURCES: Faces Nunez Employment Suit in Cal. Super. ELECTROLUX CONSUMER: Reato Suit Referred to Magistrate Judge EMERALD SOCAL: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, Kizhakadathu Says ENERGIZER HOLDINGS: Joint Bid to Stay Discovery in Copeland OK'd ENERGIZER HOLDINGS: Joint Bid to Stay Discovery in PPI OK'd ENERGIZER HOLDINGS: Joint Bid to Stay Discovery in Schuman OK'd ESPANOLA PUBLIC: Dominguez Files FCRA Suit in D. New Mexico EXPERIAN INFORMATION: Removes Aufrichtig Suit to C.D. Cal. FAST WATER: Faces Cronk Wage-and-Hour Suit in C.D. Cal. FC 111 N STREET: Abyaneh Files Suit in D.C. Super. Ct. FIRST NATIONAL HOLDINGS: Ray Files Suit in N.D. Illinois FIRST NATIONAL: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Baca Suit Alleges FLYNT MANAGEMENT: Faces Escobar Personal Injury Suit in Cal. Super. FREIGHT BREAKERS: Johnson Files Suit Over Unpaid Wages GEICO GENERAL: Allowed Leave to File Sur-Reply in Marcelletti GOOGLE LLC: Hachette Balks at Reproduction of Copyrighted Works GYMREAPERS LLC: Faces Dalton Suit Over Blind-Inaccessible Website HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS: Faces Solano Employment Suit in Cal. Super. HONEY SCIENCE: Campbell Appeals Amended Suit Dismissal to 9th Cir. IKEA DISTRIBUTION: Adams Consumer Suit Removed to N.D. Ill. INSTRUCTURE INC: Vallera Sues Over Lost Access to Canvas FFT Course INTUIT INC: Baldwin Seeks Damages Over Share Price Drop KAYNE ANDERSON: Diapera Files Suit Over Unpaid Overtime Wages KIRIN TRANSPORTATION: Appeals Tossed New Trial Bid to 2nd Circuit LAST BRAND: Intercepts Electronic Data Without Consent, Wright Says LEARNING CARE: Removes McCoard Suit to W.D. Wash. LITTLE SLEEPIES: Vanderpoel Sues Over Disclosed Website Users' Data LOS ANGELES, CA: Appeals Attorneys' Fees Order in Griffin Suit LOVESHACKFANCY LLC: Court Narrows Claims in "Harris" MATTERPORT LLC: Vanderpoel Sues Over Disclosure of Electronic Data MEDLINE INDUSTRIES: Mismanages Retirement Plan, Fredbeck Alleges MEJURI (US) INC: Tejon Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida MERCADIEN PC: Faces Williams Suit Over Clients' Compromised Info MERIDIAN CARE INC: Chilaka Sues Over to Recover Unpaid Wages META PLATFORMS: Bid to Modify Class Cert. Briefing Sched OK'd MH SUB I LLC: Delic Files TCPA Suit in N.D. Illinois MICROSOFT CORP: Seeks to Seal Class Cert Opposition Documents MIKE'S BEER: Class Cert Bid Filing in McFeaters Suit Due Dec. 11 MOLINA HEALTHCARE: Class Certification Filing in Rhebb Due Nov. 20 MOTT'S LLP: Extension of Class Certification Deadlines Sought MV TRANSPORTATION: Removes Jackson Suit to C.D. Cal. MYCAJITA CORP: Espinal Sues Over Blind's Equal Access to Website MYRTLE BEACH, SC: Class Cert Bid Filing in Daniel Due August 19 NASSAU COUNTY, NY: Myers's Bid for Class Certification Tossed NEW DIRECTION: Class Certification Bid Filing Set for Sept. 28 NEW DIRECTION: Parties Seek to Amend Scheduling Order NEWFRONT INSURANCE: Sued Over Employee Shareholders Discrimination NINKASI HOLDING: Midler Appeals Denied Remand Bid to 9th Circuit NORTH LOS ANGELES: Faces G.M. Suit Over Data Breach NORTH LOS ANGELES: Fails to Protect Personal Info, Suit Says NUTRIEN LTD: Faces Harden Over NPK Fertilizers' Monopoly OXFORD FINANCIAL: Faces Bird TCPA Suit in D. Ariz. PACCAR INC: Bid for Class Certification in 10th Gear Due Oct. 13 PASCO PROCESSING: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Gallegos Alleges PEACEFUL CORNER: Hernandez Seeks Collective Conditional Status PHH MORTGAGE: Consolidated Bid to Seal Documents OK'd PLUMBING LLC: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Mejia Suit Alleges POWERHOME TECHNOLOGIES: Gotra's Bid to Vacate Class Cert. Tossed PRECISION HEATING: Class Certification Hearing Set for Sept. 2 PROJECT HEALTHY: Uses Trap & Trace on Website, Resnick Suit Claims R&E MANAGEMENT: Faces Graham Suit Over Unlawful Rent Collection RACK ROOM SHOES: Santiago Suit Removed to W.D. Washington RAWLINGS SPORTING: Giles Suit Removed to W.D. Washington RKR TRAFFIC: Fails to Pay Proper Overtime Wages, Cornett Suit Says ROCKLEY PHOTONICS: $10MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 20 ROUTE APP INC: Biada Suit Removed to D. Utah ROYALTY HEATING & AIR: Dixon Files TCPA Suit in E.D. California SAFEBUILT INSURANCE: Miller Suit Removed to N.D. Illinois SAM'S AUTOMOTIVE: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, Leib Alleges SANDISK LLC: Renewed Motion for Class Certification Tossed SCHNEIDERMAN FURNITURE: Lopez Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING: Lerma Suit Removed to E.D. Washington SEALIFT INC: Dziennik Files Writ of Mandamus Petition to 2nd Cir. SEATTLE CONCESSIONS: Hendricks Suit Removed to W.D. Washington SELENE FINANCE: England Suit Seeks to Certify Class & Subclass SENTRY CREDIT: Faces Lyons Consumer Credit Suit in S.D. Fla. SHIPSURANCE INSURANCE: Drouillard Suit Removed to C.D. California SKINNYCORP LLC: Brooks Suit Removed to W.D. Washington SKYWEST AIRLINES: Class Cert Hearing Remains on August 6 SOLVENTUM CORP: Faces Rucco Personal Injury Suit in D. Minn. SOUTH DAKOTA: Plaintiffs' Bid for Class Certification Tossed STEFANO PESSINA: NT Combined Files Suit in Del. Chancery Ct. STEPHEN SMITH: Bid to Decertify Classes Tossed SUNNYSIDE, WA: Court Enters Scheduling Order SWEEPSTEAKS LTD: Seeks to Strike Class Allegations in Ridley Suit TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS: Ressler Suit Removed to S.D. Florida TELLURIDE RESORT: Alvarez Appeals Final Judgment to 10th Circuit TEXAS: Faces Washington Detainees' Suit in W.D. Tex. TEXTRON AVIATION: Class Cert Filing in Barry Amended to Dec. 17 THERMA LLC: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, Rivas Alleges TITAN COMMUNICATIONS: Faces Villalpando Wage-and-Hour Suit in Cal. TLCH FOODS INC: Erwin Suit Removed to W.D. Washington TOYOTA INDUSTRIES: Class Settlement in Broadmoor Gets Final Nod TOYOTA MOTOR: Plaintiffs Seek Prelim Approval of Class Settlement TRANS UNION: Christian Class Certification Bid Tossed TRANSUNION LLC: McLeod Suit Transferred From C.D. Cal. to N.D. Ill. TRUSTAFF MANAGEMENT: Tarber Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages U.S. BANK: Hakimian Sues Over Unlawful Non-Disparagement Provision ULTA SALON: Aids Meta to Intercept Electronic Data, Hartigan Says UNION PACIFIC: Appeals Class Cert. Order in Black Suit to 10th Cir. UNITED EDUCATION: Campbell Sues Over Leaked Private Information UNITED PARCEL: Seeks Leave to File Sur-Reply in Brown Lawsuit UNITED PARCEL: Seeks to Seal Exhibits in Brown Class Suit UNITED STATES: Appeals Denied Lift Administrative Stay to 1st Cir. UNITED STATES: Appeals Injunction and Class Cert. Order in Coe Suit UNITED STATES: Calandrella Appeals Court Order to Federal Circuit UNITED STATES: Komatsu Bid to Intervene Nixed UNITED STATES: L.N.P. Cross Appeals Court Judgment to 4th Circuit V.F. CORPORATION: Brooks Suit Removed to W.D. Washington VAN LAURENCE BARKER: Cervantez-Tkac Class Action Stayed VBIT TECHNOLOGIES: Summary Judgment Filing Extended in Pelham VR NW HOLDINGS: Cortez Suit Removed to W.D. Washington WAL-MART ASSOCIATES: Casillas Suit Removed to C.D. California WALGREEN CO: Tichenor Suit Removed to W.D. Washington WALMART INC: Removes Basile Suit to N.D. Ill. WASTE MANAGEMENT: Chavarin Suit Removed to C.D. California WATSON CLINIC: Discloses Personal Info to 3rd Parties, B.D. Says WELLS FARGO: Plaintiff Seeks Clarification of Class Cert Order WELLS FARGO: Private ADR Process in Morris Extended to Nov. 19 WEST POINT PHYSICAL THERAPY: Rico Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. WEX INC: Conditional Class Cert Bid in Darby Due Dec. 11 WFG NATIONAL: Miles Seeks FLSA Conditional Collective Certification WHAT IF HOLDINGS: Class Cert Bid Filing Extended WHOLE FOODS MARKET: Shorley Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. WILMER CUTLER: Perry Sues Over Unauthorized Access of Clients' Info WILSON ELECTRIC: Seeks to File Supplement to Decertify Class WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE: Myler Suit Removed to W.D. Washington WORKDAY INC: Class Certification Bid in Mobley Due Sept. 14 YALDA AR LLC: Muoka Sues Over Failure to Pay for Wages YH HOME BUYERS: Melingonis Files TCPA Suit in S.D. California YOSEMITE FOODS INC: Mendez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. YUSEN LOGISTICS INC: Grass Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ZAM'S HOPE: Denies Safe Living Conditions, Henderson Says ZILLOW INC: Dobbins Suit Alleges Violation of FCRA ZIPRECRUITER INC: Smith Sues Over Breach of Fiduciary Duty ********* 5975 SUNSET LLC: Pardo Sues Over Discriminative Property -------------------------------------------------------- Nigel Frank De La Torre Pardo, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated mobility-impaired individuals v. 5975 SUNSET LLC and SHAHS OF KABOB, LLC D/B/A SHAHS OF KABOB, Case No. 1:26-cv-24763-XXXX (S.D. Fla., July 13, 2026), is brought for injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and costs pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") as a result of the Defendant's discrimination against the individual Plaintiff by denying him access to, and full and equal enjoyment of, the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages and/or accommodations of the Commercial Property and business located therein, as prohibited by the ADA. Although over 33 years have passed since the effective date of Title III of the ADA, Defendant has yet to make their facilities accessible to individuals with disabilities. Congress provided commercial businesses one and a half years to implement the Act. The effective date was January 26, 1992. In spite of this abundant lead-time and the extensive publicity the ADA has received since 1990, Defendant has continued to discriminate against people who is disabled in ways that block them from access and use of Defendant's property and the businesses therein. The Plaintiff found the commercial property and restaurant business located within the commercial property to be rife with ADA violations. The Plaintiff encountered architectural barriers at the commercial property and restaurant business located within the commercial property and wishes to continue his patronage and use of the premises. The Plaintiff has encountered architectural barriers that are in violation of the ADA at the subject places of public accommodation. The barriers to access at Defendants' commercial property and restaurant business have each denied or diminished Plaintiff's ability to visit these places of public accommodation and have endangered his safety in violation of the ADA. The Defendants have discriminated against the individual Plaintiff by denying him access to, and full and equal enjoyment of, the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages and/or accommodations of the commercial property, as prohibited by the ADA, says the complaint. The Plaintiff uses a wheelchair to ambulate. 5975 SUNSET LLC owns and operates a commercial property which is a place of public accommodation.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony J. Perez, Esq. ANTHONY J. PEREZ LAW GROUP, PLLC 7950 w. Flagler Street, Suite 104 Miami, FL 33144 Phone: (786) 361-9909 Facsimile: (786) 687-0445 Email: ajp@ajperezlawgroup.com Secondary Email: jr@ajperezlawgroup.com 7-ELEVEN INC: Walsh Suit Removed to C.D. California --------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Michael Walsh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Walter Alexander, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 7-ELEVEN, INC., Texas corporation, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Case No. 26STCV17260 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-07525. In the State Court Action, Plaintiffs allege that 7-Eleven falsely represents that its Seven Select Danish products ("Products") are naturally flavored. On this basis, Plaintiffs assert numerous claims, including alleged violations of California's Unfair Competition Law ("UCL"), California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA"), breach of express warranty, intentional misrepresentation, unjust enrichment/restitution and negligent misrepresentation.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Shawn R. Obi, Esq. WINSTON TAYLOR LLP 333 S. Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543 Phone: (213) 615-1700 Facsimile: (213) 615-1750 Email: Shawn.Obi@winstontaylor.com A & M ENGINEERING: Huerta Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against A & M Engineering, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Eduardo Castillo Huerta, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. A & M Engineering, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. 26STCV22132 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., July 14, 2026). A & M Engineering -- https://amengineeringinc.com/ -- manufactures aircraft parts and airframe structures made from steel, aluminum, and titanium.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kane Moon, Esq. MOON LAW GROUP, PC 725 S Figueroa St., 31st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (213) 232-3128 Fax: (213) 232-3125 Email: kane.moon@moonyanglaw.com ABC PHONES: Fails to Secure Clients' Private Info, Daffin Suit Says ------------------------------------------------------------------- JONATHAN DAFFIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ABC PHONES OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., d/b/a VICTRA, INC., Defendant, Case No. 5:26-cv-00485-D (E.D.N.C., July 15, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for negligence, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, and declaratory and injunctive relief. The case arises from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information and protected health information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals stored within its network systems following a data breach on or about April 22, 2026. The Defendant also failed to timely notify the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals about the data breach. As a result, the private information of the Plaintiff and Class members was compromised and damaged through access by and disclosure to unknown and unauthorized third parties, says the suit. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc., doing business as Victra, Inc., is a retailer of Verizon in the United States, headquartered in Raleigh, North Carolina. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jean S. Martin, Esq. AYLSTOCK WITKIN KREIS & OVERHOLTZ PLC 17 E. Main Street, Suite 200 Pensacola, FL 32502 Telephone: (850) 202-1010 Email: jmartin@awkolaw.com - and - William B. Federman, Esq. Jessica A. Wilkes, Esq. FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 10205 N. Pennsylvania Ave. Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Telephone: (405) 235-1560 Email: wbf@federmanlaw.com jjh@federmanlaw.com ABUILT CONSTRUCTION: Lopez Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages ---------------------------------------------------------- Horlen Lopez, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. ABUILT CONSTRUCTION LLC and ALEX LUCERO, Case No. 1:26-cv-05905 (S.D.N.Y., July 13, 2026), is brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") the New York Labor Law ("NYLL"), that he and others similarly situated are entitled to recover from Defendants: unpaid wages, including overtime, due to time shaving; unpaid overtime premiums, due to unlawful straight rate compensation; unpaid call-in premiums; liquidated damages for late payments of wages; liquidated damages; and attorneys' fees and costs. Throughout his employment, Plaintiff was time shaved and not compensated for all hours worked. Specifically, approximately twice per week, Defendants required Plaintiff to stay at work 20 minutes after the end of his scheduled shift to complete a task. However, Defendants only ever compensated Plaintiff for his scheduled hours. FLSA Collective Plaintiffs and Class Members were similarly compensated only for their scheduled hours rather than their actual amount of hours worked. The Defendants similarly compensated FLSA Collective Plaintiffs and Class Members at straight hourly rates and failed to pay them overtime premiums for all their hours worked over 40 hours per workweek. The Defendants knowingly and willfully operated their business with a policy of not compensating overtime premiums to Plaintiff, FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, and Class Members, in violation of the FLSA and the NYLL, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was hired by the Defendants as a laborer on construction sites across New York City in February 2025. ABUILT CONSTRUCTION LLC is a domestic limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey, operating construction sites in New York and New Jersey.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: C.K. Lee, Esq. Anne Seelig, Esq. LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC 148 West 24th Street, Eighth Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: 212-465-1188 Fax: 212-465-1181 ACCRUE FINANCE INC: Trikakis Files Suit in S.D. California ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Accrue Finance Inc. The case is styled as Jason Trikakis, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Accrue Finance Inc. doing business as: Awaken, Case No. 3:26-cv-04034-AJB-DEB (S.D. Cal., July 14, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. Accrue -- https://www.accruefinancial.com/ -- is a brandable, full-stack payments solution for modern customer loyalty.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Ray Sebastian Seilie, Esq. KINSELLA HOLLEY ISER KUMP STEINSAPIR LLP 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 750 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Phone: (310) 566-9800 Fax: (310) 566-9850 Email: rseilie@khiks.com ADAPTHEALTH CORP: Fails to Protect Personal Info, McCall Says ------------------------------------------------------------- SHARI MCCALL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ADAPTHEALTH CORP., Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-04795 (E.D. Pa., July 10, 2026) is a class action arising from the Defendant's failure to protect highly sensitive data. According to the complaint, the Defendant stores a litany of highly sensitive personal identifiable information and protected health information. But Defendant lost control over that data when cybercriminals infiltrated its insufficiently protected computer systems in a data breach. It is unknown for precisely how long the cybercriminals had access to Defendant's network before the breach was discovered. In other words, Defendant had no effective means to prevent, detect, stop, or mitigate breaches of its systems -- thereby allowing cybercriminals unrestricted access to stored PII. The suit asserts that cybercriminals were able to breach Defendant's systems because Defendant failed to adequately train its employees on cybersecurity and failed to maintain reasonable security safeguards or protocols to protect the Class' PII. In short, the Defendant's failures placed the Class' PII in a vulnerable position -- rendering them easy targets for cybercriminals. Plaintiff McCall is a patient of Defendant AdaptHealth, which provides her with home medical equipment, including a CPAP machine. AdaptHealth Corp. provides home healthcare equipment, medical supplies to the home and related services in the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Andrew W. Ferich, Esq. AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 201 King of Prussia Road, Suite 650 Radnor, PA 19087 Telephone: (310) 474-9111 E-mail: aferich@ahdootwolfson.com - and - Scott J. Falgoust, Esq. BRYSON HARRIS SUCIU DEMAY, PLLC 5301 Canal Street New Orleans, LA 70124 Telephone: (919) 585-4634 E-mail: sfalgoust@brysonpllc.com AES RESTAURANTS: Foster Balks at Property's Architectural Barriers ------------------------------------------------------------------ LELAND FOSTER, individually, and on behalf of individuals similarly situated, Plaintiff v. AES RESTAURANTS OF OHIO LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, and COMJ, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-00238-MJN-PBS (S.D. Ohio, July 12, 2026) is brought against the Defendant for injunctive relief, damages, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and costs pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff, a Fulton County, Ohio resident, is sui juris, and qualifies as an individual with disability as defined by the ADA. On April 30, 2026, the Plaintiff patronized the Defendants' property and business and has encountered architectural barriers at the subject property. The barriers to access at the property have endangered his safety and protected access to Defendants' place of public accommodation, says the Plaintiff. The Defendant has discriminated against him by denying him access to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages and/or accommodations of the buildings, says the suit. COMJ, LLC owns the commercial property located at 160 S Patterson Blvd., Dayton, Ohio. AES Restaurants of Ohio LLC operates the business known as Arby's fast-food restaurant located in the property.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Owen B. Dunn, Jr., Esq. LAW OFFICES OF OWEN DUNN, JR. The Offices of Unit C 6800 W. Central Ave., Suite C-1 Toledo, OH 43617 Telephone: (419) 241-9661 Facsimile: (419) 241-9737 E-mail: obdjr@owendunnlaw.com ALBERTSON'S LLC: Serna Wage-and-Hour Suit Removed to W.D. Wash. --------------------------------------------------------------- The case DIONNE SERNA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. ALBERTSON'S LLC; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Case No. 26-2-09278-3, was removed from the Superior Court of Washington, Pierce County, to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on July 14, 2026. The Clerk of Court for the Western District of Washington assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-05782 to the proceeding. The suit is brought against the Defendant for alleged failure to provide legally compliant meal and rest periods, failure to pay minimum wages, and failure to pay overtime wages. Albertson's LLC is an operator of a chain of grocery stores, headquartered in Idaho. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Priya B. Vivian, Esq. Erin M. Wilson, Esq. BALLARD SPAHR LLP 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2800 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 223-7000 Email: wilsonem@ballardspahr.com vivianp@ballardspahr.com ALL WORK TRAVEL: Herring Files TCPA Suit in E.D. California ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against All Work Travel LLC. The case is styled as Leshaun Herring, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. All Work Travel LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-05398-KES-EPG (E.D. Cal., July 13, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. AllWorkTravel is a leading travel management firm based in the United States, specializing in corporate travel solutions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gerald D. Lane, Jr., Esq. THE LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI 1515 NE 26TH Street Wilton Manors, FL 33305 Phone: (754) 444-7539 Email: gerald@jibraellaw.com AMERICAN ADDICTION: M.C. Sues Over Google's Access to Health Info ----------------------------------------------------------------- M.C., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. AMERICAN ADDICTION CENTERS, INC., Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-02089 (D. Nev., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act, common law invasion of privacy, breach of confidence, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, unjust enrichment, and breach of implied contract. The case arises from the Defendant's practice of disclosing the sensitive health information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated patients to third parties, including Alphabet, Inc. ("Google"). According to the complaint, the Defendant installed tracking technologies on its website which allows third parties to access sensitive health information without consent. As a result of the Defendant's conduct, the Plaintiff and Class members have suffered numerous injuries, including: (i) invasion of privacy; (ii) lack of trust in communicating with online service providers; (iii) emotional distress and heightened concerns related to the release of sensitive health information to third parties; (iv) loss of benefit of the bargain; (v) diminution of value of their sensitive health information; (vi) statutory damages; and (vii) continued and ongoing risk to their sensitive health information. American Addiction Centers, Inc. is a provider of addiction treatment in the U.S., with its principal place of business in Brentwood, Tennessee. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mona Amini, Esq. KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6940 S. Cimarron Road, Suite 210 Las Vegas, NV 89113 Telephone: (800) 400-6808 Email: mona@kazlg.com - and - Sonjay C. Singh, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 400 East Pratt Street, 8th Floor Baltimore, MD 21202 Telephone: (212) 532-1091 Email: ssingh@sirillp.com AMERICAN BOARD OF PREVENTATIVE: Blaney Files Suit in N.D. Ill. -------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against The American Board of Preventative Medicine Incorporated (ABPM). The case is styled as David Blaney, individually and on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated v. The American Board of Preventative Medicine Incorporated (ABPM), Case No. 1:26-cv-08222 (N.D. Ill., July 13, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Contract Dispute. The American Board of Preventive Medicine (ABPM) -- https://www.theabpm.org/ -- promotes the health and safety of the American people through high standards in physician certification.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Mark K. Svensson, Esq. MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN PLLC 405 East 50th Street New York, NY 10022 Phone: (202) 975-0468 Email: msvensson@zlk.com - and - Gary M. Klinger, Esq. MILBERG PLLC 227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2100 Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: (866) 252-0878 Email: gklinger@milberg.com AMERICAN EAGLE: Davidson Suit Removed to W.D. Washington -------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Brylee Davidson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. American Eagle Outfitters Inc, Case No. 26-00002-18686-3 SEA was removed from the King County Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on July 10, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02425-LK to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. American Eagle Outfitters -- https://www.ae.com/intl/en -- is an American clothing and accessories retailer founded in 1977 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Cody Hoesly, Esq. BARG SINGER HOESLY PC 1000 SW Broadway, Ste 900 Portland, OR 97205 Phone: (503) 241-8521 Email: choesly@bargsinger.com - and - Jonas Bram Jacobson, Esq. Simon Carlo Franzini, Esq. DOVEL & LUNER LLP 201 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 600 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Phone: (310) 656-7066 Email: jonas@dovel.com simon@dovel.com The Defendant is represented by: Blake Edward Marks-Dias, Esq. Colin M. George, Esq. CORR CRONIN LLP 1015 Second Ave., 10th Fl SEATTLE, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 625-8600 Fax: (206) 625-0900 Email: bmarksdias@corrcronin.com cgeorge@corrcronin.com AMERICAN WATER: Bradford Consumer Suit Removed to E.D. Cal. ----------------------------------------------------------- The case DAVID BRADFORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES, LLC, Case No. 26CV013518, was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento, to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on July 15, 2026. The Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of California assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02470-JDP to the proceeding. The suit is brought against the Defendant for violations of California's Unfair Competition Law, California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act, California's False Advertising Law, New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act, and common law unjust enrichment. American Water Resources, LLC is a company that provides home protection plans for water lines, sewer lines, and in-home plumbing, headquartered in Illinois. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Laura Lin, Esq. SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP One Market Plaza Spear Tower, Suite 3800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 426-7300 Facsimile: (415) 426-7301 Email: laura.lin@stblaw.com ANTHEM TAX SERVICES: Cordero Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Anthem Tax Services, LLC, et al. The case is styled as Ivonne Cordero, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Anthem Tax Services, LLC, Does 1 through 50, Case No. 26STCV21945 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., July 13, 2026). Anthem Tax Services -- https://anthemtaxservices.com/ -- is ran by tax professionals with over 100 years of combined experience in Tax Debt Relief, Tax Preparation and Tax Law.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Tuvia Korobkin, Esq. MARQUEE LAW GROUP, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 9100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 445 East Tower Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Phone: (310) 275-1844 Fax: (310) 275-1801 Email: tuvia@marqueelaw.com ANTHROPOLOGIE INC: Park Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime ------------------------------------------------------- Sarah Park, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ANTHROPOLOGIE, INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-04871 (E.D. Pa., July 13, 2026), is brought to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ("FLSA"). Although Plaintiff and the Putative Collective Members have routinely worked (and continue to work) in excess of 40 hours per workweek, Plaintiff and the Putative Collective Members were not paid overtime of at least one and one-half their regular rates for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours per workweek. The effect of the Defendant's practices were (and are) that all compensable time worked by Plaintiff and the Putative Collective Members was not (and is not) counted and paid; thus, the Defendant has failed to properly compensate Plaintiff and the Putative Collective Members for all hours worked and has failed to properly compensate them the proper amount of overtime under the FLSA. The Defendant knowingly and deliberately failed to compensate Plaintiff and the Putative Collective Members for all hours worked and the proper amount of overtime on a routine and regular basis during the relevant time period(s), says the complaint. The Plaintiff was employed by Anthropologie as a retail employee in Austin, Texas from 2019 until the present. Anthropologie operates a chain of specialty retail clothing, accessories, and home goods stores throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Timothy J. Peter, Esq. FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP 1617 John F Kennedy Blvd #1550 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Phone: 215-277-5770 Facsimile: 215-277-5771 Email: tpeter@faruqilaw.com - and - Innessa M. Huot, Esq. FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP 685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor New York, NY 10017 Phone: 212-983-9330 Facsimile: 212-983-9331 Email: ihuot@faruqilaw.com - and - Clif Alexander, Esq. Austin W. Anderson, Esq. Lauren E. Braddy, Esq. Carter T. Hastings, Esq. ANDERSON ALEXANDER, PLLC 101 N. Shoreline Blvd., Suite 610 Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Phone: (361) 452-1279 Facsimile: (361) 452-1284 Email: clif@a2xlaw.com austin@a2xlaw.com lauren@a2xlaw.com carter@a2xlaw.com APRO LLC: Villa Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Apro, LLC, et al. The case is styled as Katherine Mozo Villa, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Apro, LLC doing business as UNITED PACIFIC, Does 1-100, inclusive, Case No. 26STCV22114 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., July 14, 2026). Apro, LLC doing business as United Pacific -- https://upauto.com/ -- operates as an automative wholesaler company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Andrew J. Rowbotham, Esq. HAINES LAW GROUP, APC 2155 Campus Drive, Suite 180 El Segundo, California 90245 Phone: (424) 292-2350 Fax: (424) 292-2355 Email: arowbotham@haineslawgroup.com AS MANAGER LLC: Whitlock Files FCRA Suit in D. South Carolina ------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against AS Manager LLC. The case is styled as LaTanna Whitlock, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. AS Manager LLC, Case No. 0:26-cv-02750-MGL (D.S.C., July 10, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. AS Manager LLC doing business as stayAPT Suites -- https://www.stayapt.com/ -- is an apartment-style extended-stay hotel chain founded in 2018 and headquartered in Matthews, North Carolina.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Neil Patrick Williams, Esq. SIRI AND GLIMSTAD LLP 1901 Main Street, Suite 18th Floor Number 3037 Columbia, SC 29201 Phone: (929) 474-6448 Email: nwilliams@sirillp.com ASD SLEEP LLC: Dovbgerg Files Suit in E.D. Pennsylvania ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against ASD Sleep, LLC. The case is styled as Marvin Dovbgerg, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. ASD Sleep, LLC doing business as: American Sleep Dentistry, Case No. 2:26-cv-04804-HB (E.D. Pa., July 10, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Breach of Contract. ASD Sleep, LLC doing business as American Sleep Dentistry -- https://www.americansleepdentistry.com/ -- works with local medical doctors and dentists to treat patient's sleep apnea with a sleep appliances (replacing the CPAP).[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Alexander J. Garcia, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 1650 Market St., Ste. 3600 #17136373 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Phone: (215) 402-7926 Email: agarcia@sirillp.com ASP ISOTOPES: Class Settlement in Leone Suit Gets Initial Nod ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARK LEONE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, V. ASP ISOTOPES INC., et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-09253-CM-JW (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge McMahon entered an order preliminarily approving settlement and providing for notice. -- The Court certifies the Settlement Class consisting of: "all persons and entities that purchased the publicly traded common stock of ASPI between Sept. 26, 2024 and Nov. 26, 2024, both dates inclusive (the "Settlement Class Period"), and who were allegedly damaged thereby as alleged in the Action." Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants, the officers and directors of ASPI, at all relevant times, members of their immediate families and their legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, any entity in which the Defendants have or had a controlling interest, and any trust of which the Defendant Mann is the settlor or which is for the benefit of Defendant Mann and/or member(s) of his immediate family. Also excluded from the Settlement Class are any persons and entities who or which submit a request for exclusion from the Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court. -- Lead Plaintiff Mark Leone is certified as the class representative for the settlement class. The Court also confirms its appointment of Lead Counsel as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class, pursuant to Rule 23(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. -- The Court will hold a settlement hearing on Dec. 15, 2026, at 12:30 p.m. ASP is engaged in developing and commercializing uranium enrichment technologies. A copy of the Court's order dated July 9, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=x856k4 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Garth Spencer, Esq. GLANCY PRONGAY WOLKE & ROTTER LLP 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 The Defendant is represented by: Michael D. Blanchard, Esq. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One State Street Hartford, CT 06103 AT&T INC: Scott Seeks Prelim Approval of Class Settlement --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Timothy Scott, Patricia Gilchrist, Karen Fisher, Helen Maldonado-Valtierra, John Griffin, Kenneth Rhodes, Judy Dougherty, John Kelly, Richard Walshon, Dan Koval, Jennifer Fryer, and Vince Carabba, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. AT&T Inc., AT&T Services, Inc. and the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan, Case No. 3:20-cv-07094-JD (N.D. Cal.), the Plaintiffs, on Aug. 13, 2026 at 11 a.m., will move the Court to enter an order under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: 1. Preliminarily approving the Settlement Agreement; 2. Certifying the Settlement Class and SubClasses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b). 3. Approving the proposed Class Settlement notice as to form and content and the plan for dissemination of notice to the Class; 4. Appointing Atticus as the Settlement Administrator; 5. Setting the date and time for the Fairness Hearing; and 6. Setting dates and deadlines under Rule 23(d) and (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in order for the Court to evaluate whether the settlement should be given final approval (after distribution of the proposed class notice to the Class and submission of any objections to the settlement) and to evaluate the Plaintiffs' Counsel's request for an award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of costs and expenses and the Plaintiffs' request for class representative service awards as follows: Deadline for service of CAFA notices: July 19, 2026 Deadline for the Defendants to provide July 30, 2026 Settlement Administrator and Class Counsel data for class notice distribution: The Settlement Agreement defines the Class and SubClasses as follows: Injunction/Equitable Relief Class: "All Plan participants and their beneficiaries, excluding those participants and beneficiaries in the Mobility Program, the Mobility Bargained Program, and the DIRECTV Program, who are receiving a Joint and Survivor Annuity calculated pursuant to tabular factors set forth in the Plan, or who would receive a Joint and Survivor Annuity calculated pursuant to tabular factors set forth in the Plan upon electing a Joint and Survivor Annuity." Retired SubClass: "All Plan participants and their beneficiaries who are receiving a Joint and Survivor Annuity that is less than the value of their Single Life Annuity when converted to a Joint and Survivor Annuity using the interest rates and mortality tables set forth in 26 U.S.C. section 417(e) with an annual stability period and November lookback month, based on the participant's Benefit Payment Status on the date the Court enters the Final Approval Order and excluding those participants and beneficiaries in the Mobility Program, the Mobility Bargained Program, and the DIRECTV Program." This SubClass also shall exclude all persons identified in Exhibits A, B, and D to the declaration of Jack Abraham dated Jan. 31, 2025. Pre-Retirement SubClass: "All Plan participants and their beneficiaries who are not in Benefit Payment Status as of the date the Court enters the Final Approval Order and would receive a Joint and Survivor Annuity calculated pursuant to tabular factors set forth in the Plan upon electing a Joint and Survivor Annuity, excluding those participants and beneficiaries in the Mobility Program, the Mobility Bargained Program, and the DIRECTV Program." The proposed Settlement provides more than $149 million in value to Class members in the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (the “Plan”). AT&T is an American multinational telecommunications holding company. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated July 9, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=sXzcxc at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Todd Jackson, Esq. Nina Wasow, Esq. FEINBERG, JACKSON, WORTHMAN & WASOW, LLP 2030 Addison Street, Suite 500 Berkeley, CA 94704 Telephone: (510) 269-7998 Facsimile: (510) 269-7994 E-mail: todd@feinbergjackson.com nina@feinbergjackson.com - and - Michelle C. Yau, Esq. Kai Richter, Esq. Daniel J. Sutter, Esq. Caroline Bressman, Esq. COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 1100 New York Ave. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699 E-mail: myau@cohenmilstein.com krichter@cohenmilstein.com dsutter@cohenmilstein.com cbressman@cohenmilstein.com - and - Rachana A. Pathak, Esq. STRIS & MAHER LLP 777 S. Figueroa St., Suite 3850 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 995-6800 Facsimile: (213) 261-0299 E-mail: rpathak@stris.com - and - Shaun P. Martin, Esq. UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO 5998 Alcala Park, Warren Hall San Diego, CA 92110 Telephone: (619) 260-2347 Facsimile: (619) 260-7933 E-mail: smartin@sandiego.edu BANK OF AMERICA: Quashal of Subpoena to Third Party Sought ---------------------------------------------------------- In the case captioned as ADAM WEINRAUB, on behalf of himself as representative of the beneficiaries of the Arthur N. Weinraub Trust, as next friend of Barbara Korman, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant, Case No. 1:26-mc-24877 (S.D. Fla., July 17, 2026), the Defendant has asked the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to grant its motion to quash subpoena and for an order quashing or modifying the subpoena for deposition duces tecum served upon non-party Steven Stein, or, in the alternative, for a protective order preserving the Defendant's rights to review any documents produced by Stein for confidentiality and/or privilege. Bank of America NA operates as a bank. The Bank offers saving and current account, housing and auto loans, online banking, mortgage, credit and debit cards, investment planning, and corporate finance services. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Emily Y. Rottmann, Esq. McGUIREWOODS LLP 50 N. Laura Street, Suite 3300 Jacksonville, FL 32202 Telephone: (904) 798-3200 Facsimile: (904) 798-3207 Primary Email: erottmann@mcguirewoods.com Secondary Email: clambert@mcguirewoods.com BELEAF MEDICAL: Donham Sues Over Improper Tip Pooling ----------------------------------------------------- Stephan Donham, Heather Fedro, and Jacob Rogers, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. BELEAF MEDICAL LLC, BESAME WELLNESS, LLC, BESAME WELLNESS MANAGEMENT, LLC, and BESAME WELLNESS MISSOURI, LLC, Case NO. 4:26-cv-01097 (E.D. Mo., July 13, 2026), is brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") due to Defendants' improper pooling and retention of tips. The Plaintiffs have been provided with little to no information regarding tip pooling, eligible participants, and how distributions are calculated. They also have not been provided with a transparent accounting of the tip pools and their distributions. Defendants have violated the provisions of the FLSA, resulting in damages to Plaintiffs and those similarly situated to Plaintiffs, in the form of wrongfully withheld tips, incurred and incurring costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees. As a result of the failure to pay wages in accordance with the FLSA, Plaintiffs, and those similarly situated to Plaintiffs, have suffered monetary damages by failing to receive their lawfully owed tips during their tenure of employment with Defendants. In addition to the amount of unpaid tips owing to Plaintiffs and those similarly situated to Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs and those similarly situated are also entitled to an additional amount equal to the unpaid tips as liquidated damages pursuant to the FLSA, says the complaint. The Plaintiffs was directly employed by the Defendants. The Defendants own and operate cannabis retail dispensaries in various locations within Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Mark Potashnick, Esq. WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 133 St. Louis, MO 63141 Phone: (314) 997-9150 Email: markp@mp-attorneys.com - and - Molly A. Elkin, Esq. Sarah M. Block, Esq. Patrick J. Miller-Bartley, Esq. McGILLIVARY STEELE ELKIN LLP 1101 Vermont Ave., N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: (202) 833-8855 Email: mae@mselaborlaw.com smb@mselaborlaw.com pmb@mselaborlaw.com BETTERMENT LLC: Automatically Swept Uninvested Cash, Treadway Says ------------------------------------------------------------------ MICHAEL TREADWAY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. BETTERMENT LLC and BETTERMENT SECURITIES LLC, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-05845 (S.D.N.Y., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, declaratory relief, and unjust enrichment. The case arises from the Defendants' exploitative implementation of Betterment's Transfer Sweep Program ("TSP"), resulting in the breach of the Defendants' fiduciary duties owed to the Plaintiff and similarly situated advisory clients. According to the complaint, despite its role as an investment adviser and fiduciary, Betterment automatically swept uninvested cash balances into non-interest-bearing deposit accounts at participating banks selected by the Defendants through the TSP. Because the TSP paid zero interest, the Plaintiff and Class members lost significant interest they would have otherwise earned had the Defendants swept their cash into accounts or vehicles paying reasonable market rates, suit says. Betterment LLC is an investment adviser based in New York, New York. Betterment Securities LLC is a broker-dealer based in New York, New York. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Omer Kremer, Esq. Gabriel Mandler, Esq. Scott Edelsberg, Esq. EDELSBERG LAW, PA 20900 NE 30th Ave, Suite 417 Aventura, FL 33180 Telephone: (786) 289-9471 Email: omer@edelsberglaw.com gabriel@edelsberglaw.com scott@edelsberglaw.com - and - Jason T. Dennett, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 1700 7th Avenue, Suite 2100 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (516) 515-9124 Email: jdennett@milberg.com BILLINGS CLINIC: Brester Files Suit in D. Montana ------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Billings Clinic. The case is styled as Lydia Brester, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Billings Clinic, Case No. 1:26-cv-00061-TJC (D. Mont., July 14, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. Billings Clinic -- https://www.billingsclinic.com/ -- offers expert healthcare in Montana and Wyoming with compassionate providers and convenient services.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Keif Alexander Storrar, Esq. DOUBEK, PYFER & FOX, LLP PO Box 236 Helena, MT 59624 Phone: (406) 442-7830 Fax: (406) 442-7839 Email: keif@lawyerinmontana.com - and - Bradley Jones, Esq. DOUBEK, PYFER, & STORRAR, PLLP 307 N. Jackson St. Helena, MT 59601 Phone: (406) 442-7830 Fax: (406) 442-7839 Email: bradley@lawyerinmontana.com BLUE TEAL: Faces Moser Personal Injury Suit in N.D. Tex. -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Blue Teal Holdings, LLC. The case is captioned as Christian Moser, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Blue Teal Holdings, LLC, Case No. 7:26-cv-00069-O (N.D. Tex., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit arises from personal injury-related issues. Teal Group Holdings Ltd was founded in 2017. The company's line of business includes holding and owning securities of companies other than banks.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jonathan Herrera, Esq. FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 10205 N Pennsylvania Ave Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Telephone: (405) 235-1560 Email: jjh@federmanlaw.com BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL: Adkins Sues Over Defective Jet Boats ------------------------------------------------------------- ARIANA MARIA RENEE ADKINS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS INC.; and BRP US, INC., Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-00164-AW-MAF (N.D. Fla., July 17, 2026) is a consumer class action brought on behalf of the Plaintiff and all others similarly situated who purchased a jet-powered pontoon boat Defendants sold to consumers across the U.S. under the "Sea-Doo Switch" name that contains dangerous, unsafe, and defective designs. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, the Switch boats contain a dangerous and unsafe design defect that allows water to enter and accumulate in the vessel's hull, causing the boat to lose stability, nose-dive, and capsize ("Capsizing Defect"). The same defective, non-watertight hull design also permits water to intrude into the Switch boats' hull and engine compartment during ordinary use, causing engine damage, electronic fault codes, corrosion, loss of propulsion, and near-sinking events ("Water-Intrusion Defect"), says the suit. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. is a maker of powersports vehicles and marine products like Sea-Doo, Ski-Doo, and Can-Am. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Stuart A. Davidson, Esq. Facundo M. Scialpi, Esq. ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 225 NE Mizner Boulevard, Suite 720 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Telephone: (561) 750-3000 Email: sdavidson@rgrdlaw.com fscialpi@rgrdlaw.com - and - Marc A. Wites, Esq. Thomas Rogers, Esq. WITES & ROGERS 4400 North Federal Highway Lighthouse Point, FL 33064 Telephone: (954) 933-4400 Email: mwites@witeslaw.com trogers@witeslaw.com BRIDGEPOINT SERVICES: Faces Brennan Suit in S.D. Fla. ----------------------------------------------------- A class action suit has been filed against BridgePoint Services LLC. The case is captioned as Michael Brennan individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated employees v. BridgePoint Services LLC, Case No. 0:26-cv-61727-EA (S.D. Fla., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit arises from consumer credit-related issues. Bridgepoint Services LLC is a private mental and emotional health support provider based in North Chesterfield, Virginia.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Samuel Joseph Awad, Esq. 1515 NE 26th St Wilton Manors, FL 33305 Telephone:(561) 379-9248 Email: samuel@jibraellaw.com BROWNS TIRE: Baldridge Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages ------------------------------------------------------------- ALAN BALDRIDGE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. BROWNS TIRE SALES, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-00827-EAS-KAJ (S.D. Ohio, July 10, 2026) is brought against the Defendant pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act. The Plaintiff was employed with Defendant between November 2022 and April 2024 as a mechanic and a technician. The Plaintiff and other mechanics and technicians consistently worked more than 40 hours per workweek within the three years prior to filing this complaint. However, the Defendant willfully refused and continues to refuse to pay mechanics and technicians in accordance with the law, says the suit. Browns Tire Sales, LLC is in the business of providing automotive parts and repair services. The Company operates at 840 Harrisburg Pike, Columbus, Ohio.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Erica Ann Probst, Esq. Andrea L. Salvino, Esq. KEMP, SCHAEFFER & ROWE CO., L.PA. 88 West Mound Street Columbus, OH 43215 Telephone: (614) 232-8692 Facsimile: (614) 469-7170 E-mail: erica@ksrlegal.com asalvino@ksrlegal.com BSS MONITORING CORP: Trimble Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against BSS Monitoring Corp., et al. The case is styled as John Trimble, on behalf of himself, individually, and all other persons similarly situated v. BSS Monitoring Corp. d/b/a Sentry and Security Communications, Steven Spinner, Brian Spinner, Case No. 615002/2026 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty., July 13, 2026). The nature of suit stated as Torts - Other (New York Labor Law Claim). BSS Monitoring Corp. doing business as Sentry and Security Communications -- https://www.sentryprotectsyou.com/ -- supplies and installs all types of low-voltage security and communications systems including video surveillance, commercial fire alarms and dozens more.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: David Donald Barnhorn, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF PETER A. ROMERO PLLC 825 Veterans Hwy Hauppauge, NY 11788 Phone: +1 631 257 5588 Fax: +1 631 239 5796 CADILLAC PASADENA: Castro Seeks to Recover Regular, Overtime Pay ---------------------------------------------------------------- ANTONIO CASTRO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and the general public, Plaintiff, v. CADILLAC PASADENA LLC, a California limited liability company; US AUTO CA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; US AUTO TRUST, a business entity of unknown form; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV19383 (Cal., Super., Los Angeles Cty., June 17, 2026) is a class action complaint arising from the Defendants' alleged violations of the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code. The complaint cites seven causes of action including the failure to pay hourly wages and overtime, failure to provide meal periods, failure to provide rest periods, failure to provide indemnity, unfair competition, failure to provide accurate written wage statements and failure to timely pay all final wages. Plaintiff Castro was employed by the Defendant as a non-exempt employee and seeks to recover unpaid wages, liquidated damages, statutory penalties, restitution, and related relief on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and the general public. Cadillac Pasadena is a limited liability company operating as a luxury automobile dealership in California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: David Keledjian, Esq. Svetlana Hovhannisyan, Esq. D.LAW, INC. 250 N Madison Avenue, 2nd Floor Pasadena, CA 91101-1639 Telephone: (818) 962-6465 Facsimile: (818) 962-6469 Emails: D.Keledjian@d.law L.Hovhannisyan@d.law CALIFORNIA FOOD: Herrera Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against California Food Management, LLC, et al. The case is styled as Calvin Adali Gonzalez Herrera, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. California Food Management, LLC, Does 1 through 10, Case No. 26STCV22127 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., July 14, 2026). California Food Management, LLC is a fast-food restaurant franchise management company doing business as Burger King.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kane Moon, Esq. MOON LAW GROUP, PC 725 S Figueroa St., 31st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (213) 232-3128 Fax: (213) 232-3125 Email: kane.moon@moonyanglaw.com CAMBRIAN HOMECARE: Mathews Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cambrian Homecare, LLC, et al. The case is styled as Hilary J. Mathews, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Cambrian Homecare, LLC, Does 1 to 50, Case No. 26STCV21949 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., July 13, 2026). Cambrian Homecare -- https://www.cambrianhomecare.com/ -- provides customized, flexible, non-medical homecare to seniors and children/adults with developmental/intellectual disabilities.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony L. Draper, Esq. JAMES HAWKINS APLC 9880 Research Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618 Phone: (949) 387-7200 Fax: (949) 387-6676 Email: anthony@jameshawkinsaplc.com CANDID MAVEN: Gamez Sues Over Unlawful Spam E-mails --------------------------------------------------- JASMINE GAMEZ, on behalf of all similarly-situated individuals, Plaintiff v. CANDID MAVEN INC., an Arizona corporation, d/b/a RIGHTROUTENOW.COM, Defendant, Case No. 26STCV22113 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for alleged violations of the California Business and Professions Code, California Trap and Trace Law, and for intrusion upon seclusion. According to the complaint, the Defendant and its affiliate marketers bombard Californians with illegal spam disguised as urgent and official communications from the federal government to trick them into clicking on links that enable Defendant and its marketing partners to track them across the Internet. The suit asserts that the Defendant's misconduct is especially reprehensible because it exploits consumers through a multi-step scheme of deception. First, the unsolicited commercial e-mail received by Plaintiff falsely purports to originate from the "Department of Veterans Affairs" and falsely states that Plaintiff has been "audited." Second, the embedded link in the e-mail transports recipients to a website that mimics an official government resource for veterans, which advises visitors that they are entitled to unique, time sensitive benefit if they click on a link that takes them to Defendant's website. Third, once a user is on Defendant's website, the Defendant secretly invites third parties into each visitor's browsing session by installing tracking pixels that allow those third parties to receive the visitor's communications and online activity without the visitor's knowledge or consent. The Plaintiff is the owner of the California e-mail address castrillojasmine@yahoo.com Earlier this year, the Plaintiff received an e-mail at that address that appeared to be from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Candid Maven, Inc. is an Arizona corporation that markets self-help products to Californians via e-mail.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott J. Ferrell, Esq. Victoria C. Knowles, Esq. PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS A Professional Corporation 4100 Newport Place Drive, Ste. 800 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (949) 706-6464 Facsimile: (949) 706-6469 E-mail: sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com vknowles@pacifictiialattorneys.com CARGOMATIC INC: Duran Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cargomatic, Inc., et al. The case is styled as John Duran, Froylan Rodriguez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Cargomatic, Inc., Does 1 through 25, inclusive, Case No. 26STCV21948 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., July 13, 2026). Cargomatic Inc. -- https://cargomatic.com/ -- operates an online platform that connects shippers with carriers real-time.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ryan A. Quadrel, Esq. Philippe M.J. Gaudard, Esq. Shelby L. Miner, Esq. Joseph O. Marshall, Esq. BLACKSTONE LAW, APC 8383 Wilshire Boulevard., Ste. 745 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: 310-622-4278 Fax: 855-786-6356 Email: rquadrel@blackstonepc.com pgaudard@blackstonepc.com sminer@blackstonepc.com jmarshall@blackstonepec.com CATALYST BRANDS: Faces Teles-Rosario Suit in E.D. Tex. ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Catalyst Brands LLC, et al. The case is captioned as Isaac Teles-Rosario, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Catalyst Brands LLC and Penney OpCo LLC d/b/a JCPenney, Case No. 4:26-cv-00666-MJT (E.D. Tex., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit arises from personal injury-related issues. Catalyst Brands LLC is a major retail joint venture formed in January 2025 through the merger of JCPenney and Sparc Group.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Leigh Skye Montgomery, Esq. EKSM, LLP 4200 Montrose Boulevard, Suite 200 Houston, TX 77006 Telephone: (888) 350-3931 Facsimile: (888) 276-3455 Email: lmontgomery@eksm.com CENTRIC BRANDS: Dalton Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind --------------------------------------------------------------- Julie Dalton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Centric Brands Holding LLC d/b/a Dockers, Defendant, Case No. 0:26-cv-03254-NEB-DJF (D. Minn., July 10, 2026) arises because Defendant's website www.us.dockers.com is not fully and equally accessible to people who are blind or who have low vision in violation of both the general non-discriminatory mandate and the effective communication and auxiliary aids and services requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and its implementing regulations. As a consequence of her experience visiting Defendant's website, including in the past year, and from an investigation performed on her behalf, the Plaintiff found Defendant's website has a number of digital barriers that deny screen-reader users like her full and equal access to important Website content -- content Defendant makes available to its sighted website users. The Plaintiff and the putative class have been, and in the absence of injunctive relief will continue to be, injured, and discriminated against by Defendant's failure to provide its online website content and services in a manner that is compatible with screen reader technology, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction requiring a change in Defendant's corporate policies to cause its online store to become, and remain, accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, a civil penalty payable to the state of Minnesota. In addition to her claim under the ADA, the Plaintiff also asserts a companion cause of action under the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Centric Brands Holding LLC operates the website that offers men's apparel and accessories for sale including, but not limited to, shirts, pants, chinos, khakis, shorts, big and tall clothing, and more.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Patrick W. Michenfelder, Esq. Chad A. Throndset, Esq. Jason Gustafson, Esq. THRONDSET MICHENFELDER, LLC 80 S. 8th Street, Suite 900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (763) 515-6110 E-mail: pat@throndsetlaw.com chad@throndsetlaw.com jason@throndsetlaw.com CHINA INTERNATIONAL: Sued Over Shipping Container Monopoly ---------------------------------------------------------- VC999 PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CHINA INTERNATIONAL MARINE CONTAINERS (GROUP) CO., LTD.; CIMC USA, INC.; SHANGHAI UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS EQUIPMENT CO., LTD. a/k/a "DONG FANG INTERNATIONAL CONTAINERS"; FLORENS ASSET MANAGEMENT (USA), LIMITED; FLORENS CONTAINER, INC.; CXIC GROUP CONTAINERS CO. LTD.; SINGAMAS CONTAINER HOLDINGS LTD., Defendants, Case No. 4:26-cv-07447 (N.D. Cal., July 17, 2026) alleges violation of the Sherman Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendants are engaged in a global conspiracy to enter into agreements involving "Standard Dry Shipping Containers" to restrict supplies, fix prices, allocate market shares, stifle competition, and thereby charge purchasers supra-competitive prices. As early as November 14, 2019, the Defendants, by and through their senior officers, entered into secretive arrangements to drastically limit the supply of new Standard Dry Shipping Containers to the global market with the explicit goal of artificially raising prices on Standard Dry Shipping Containers in order to increase shipping costs for American businesses that relied on importing goods from overseas, says the suit. China International Marine Containers (Group) Co., Ltd. designs and manufactures container products. The Company produces and sells containers, dry containers, dry cargo containers, insulated containers, and other products. China International Marine Containers (Group) also provides transportation services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr., Esq. Todd A. Seaver, Esq. Carl N. Hammarskjold, Esq. Sean M. Akchin, Esq. BERMAN TABACCO 425 California Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 433-3200 Facsimile: (415) 433-6382 Email: jtabacco@bermantabacco.com tseaver@bermantabacco.com chammarskjold@bermantabacco.com sakchin@bermantabacco.com CIDER INC: Kaslofsky Files TCPA Suit in C.D. California ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cider Inc. The case is styled as Dennis Kaslofsky, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Cider Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-07634 (C.D. Cal., July 14, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Cider -- https://m.shopcider.com/ -- offers stylish and trendy women's clothing and accessories globally.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott A. Edelsberg, I, Esq. EDELSBERG LAW PA 1925 Century Park E, Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (305) 975-3320 Email: scott@edelsberglaw.com COACHELLA MUSIC: Uses Trap & Trace on Website, Haviland Alleges --------------------------------------------------------------- ELIZABETH HAVILAND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. COACHELLA MUSIC FESTIVAL, LLC, GOLDENVOICE, LLC, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 2:26-at-01167 (E.D. Cal., July 11, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for violation of the California Trap and Trace Law. The case arises from the Defendants' use of trap and trace technology to identify users of their website, Coachella.com, without prior consent. According to the complaint, the Defendants installed and deployed software of data brokers and social media/advertising companies on the website to secretly collect data about website visitors, their devices, locations and activity to identify who they are, target them with unwanted marketing and track their internet browsing on an ongoing basis. As a result of the Defendants' unlawful practice, the Plaintiff and Class members suffered injuries including invasion of their legally protected privacy rights, their loss of control over their personal identifying information, the diminution in value of their data and identity, and mental anguish from knowledge of secret monitoring by the Defendants. Coachella Music Festival, LLC is a producer of annual music festival, with its principal place of business in Los Angeles, California. Goldenvoice, LLC is a concert promoter and music event producer, with its principal place of business in Los Angeles, California. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: J. Evan Shapiro, Esq. Camrie Ventry, Esq. TAULER SMITH LLP 626 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 927-9270 Email: eshapiro@taulersmith.com cventry@taulersmith.com COFFEE COUNTY, TN: Ashley Sues Over 1st & 14th Amendment Violations ------------------------------------------------------------------- TERRY ASHLEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. GERALD EWELL, in his capacity as General Sessions Judge for Coffee County; GREG PERRY, in his capacity as General Sessions Judge for Coffee County; and CRAIG NORTHCOTT, in his capacity as District Attorney General for the Fourteenth Judicial District, Defendants, Case No. 4:26-cv-00039 (E.D. Tenn., July 15, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for infringement of the freedoms of association and speech, and of family integrity and violation of procedural due process under the First Amendment and/or the Fourteenth Amendment. According to the complaint, the Defendants violated the First Amendment and/or the Fourteenth Amendment by: (1) imposing a prior restraint on the Plaintiff's speech without any sufficient governmental purpose, without any adversarial hearing, and/or without narrowly tailoring the ban so as to be reasonable and definite and to target only prohibitable speech; (2) imposing a ban on the Plaintiff's communication, contact, and proximity with the alleged victim, without any individualized inquiry or any narrow tailoring of the restriction to the least restrictive means of serving a compelling state interest directly and substantially burdened the fundamental right to intimate or familial association; and (3) restricting the Plaintiff's liberty, including rights to speak, associate, visit certain places, and even drink alcohol, without any advance notice. Coffee County is a county located in the central part of the state of Tennessee.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Drew Justice, Esq. 1902 Cypress Drive Murfreesboro, TN 37130 Telephone: (615) 419-4994 Email: drew@justicelawoffice.com COLORADO REHABILITATION: Faces Cooper Suit Over Compromised Info ---------------------------------------------------------------- SUE COOPER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. COLORADO REHABILITATION AND OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE, PLLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-03172 (D. Colo., July 15, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for gross negligence, negligence per se, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, and invasion of privacy. The case arises from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information and protected health information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals stored within its network systems following a data breach on or about July 2, 2026. The Defendant also failed to timely notify the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals about the data breach. As a result, the private information of the Plaintiff and Class members was compromised and damaged through access by and disclosure to unknown and unauthorized third parties, says the suit. Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC is a healthcare provider based in Colorado. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Grayson Wells, Esq. Darrius D. Dixon, Esq. STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC The Freedom Center 223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200 Nashville, TN 37203 Telephone: (615) 254-8801 Email: gwells@stranchlaw.com ddixon@stranchlaw.com CONSUMER 2.0 INC: Faces Hernandez Employment Suit in Cal. Super. ---------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Consumer 2.0, Inc. et al. The case is captioned as Christopher Romario Hernandez, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated employees v. Consumer 2.0, Inc., et al. Case No. 2026CUOE068315 (Cal. Super., Ventura Cty., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit arises from employment-related issues. Consumer 2.0, Inc. is an information technology and software development company doing business as Rently, providing smart home and self-touring rental technology. Founded in 2011 and headquartered in Los Angeles, California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Elizabeth Harrier, Esq. COZZIA USA: Faces Vasquez Employment Suit in Cal. Super. -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cozzia USA LLC. The case is captioned as Andrea Kiana Vasquez, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated employees v. Cozzia USA LLC, Case No. 26STCV19368 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit arises from employment-related issues. Cozzia USA LLC was founded in 2009. The company's line of business includes the manufacturing of electrical equipment and supplies.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. LAVI & EBRAHIMIAN, LLP 8889 W Olympic Blvd Ste 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211-3638 CRCD ENTERPRISES: Linear Sues Over Unpaid Wages ----------------------------------------------- RENIKA LINEAR, an individual, on behalf of herself and all similarly situated employees, Plaintiff v. CRCD ENTERPRISES, a California corporation; ANTONIO MANNING, an individual; BRYAN WILSON, an individual; MARK ANTHONY WILSON, an individual; HUGO ORTIZ, an individual; DALILA SOTELO, an individual; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV21779 (Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., Cal., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for failing to pay overtime wages to Plaintiff and other non exempt employees in the State of California in violation of California state wage and hour laws. The complaint relates that the Plaintiff and other similarly situated employees have not been paid, during the relevant liability periods, wages for all time worked, including overtime wages. Specifically, Defendants had a policy or practice of failing to accurately track and/or pay for all hours actually worked; engaging, suffering, or permitting employees to work off the clock (including by requiring employees to work after clocking out and offsite work or by failing to pay employees for on-call hours); failing to pay overtime hours at the proper overtime rate of pay, including, without limitation, by paying overtime hours at the improper rate(s) of pay and/or recharacterizing overtime hours worked to appear that they worked at a different time or pay period; by failing to pay for reporting time pay; and/or by manipulating or editing time records to show lesser hours than actually worked during the pay period. The Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated employees, brings this action pursuant to, including but not limited to, the Labor Code including California Code of Regulations, seeking overtime wages, minimum wages, payment of premium wages for missed meal and rest periods, penalties, reimbursement for expenses incurred in furtherance of job duties, other such provisions of California law, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. Plaintiff RENIKA LINEAR was employed by the Defendants as a non-exempt hourly employee performing duties as a custodian starting February 2025 through May 2025. Defendant CRCD Enterprises is a social enterprise that offers services in the fields of General Construction, Facilities Maintenance, and Urban Infrastructure.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael C. Robinson, Jr., Esq. Orion S. Robinson, Esq. ROBINSON DI LANDO A Professional Law Corporation 801 S. Grand Ave., Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 229-0100 Facsimile: (213) 229-0114 E-mail: mrobinson@rdwlaw.com orobinson@rdwlaw.com CROWN CORK: Faces Ortiz Suit Over Unfair Tobacco Surcharges ----------------------------------------------------------- CHARITY A. ORTIZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-04827 (E.D. Pa., July 10, 2026) challenges Defendant's unlawful practice of charging a tobacco surcharge under the CC&S Group Health Plan in a manner that violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the implementing regulations. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. is a Pennsylvania corporation. Crown, through its parent, subsidiaries, and affiliates, is a global packaging company that supplies rigid packaging products, including beverage cans, food cans, aerosol cans, closures, promotional packaging, and related packaging products and services to customers throughout the United States. The Plaintiff is a former employee of Crown who paid a tobacco surcharge to maintain health insurance coverage under the Plan. According to the complaint, the Defendant imposes a discriminatory $100 monthly tobacco surcharge while failing to make available a compliant reasonable alternative standard, failing to notify participants of the "full reward" or any avenue to obtain it, and failing to provide the required physician-accommodation statement -- violating federal regulations and depriving employees of benefits to which they are entitled under ERISA. This surcharge imposed an additional financial burden on Plaintiff, and continues to impose such a burden on those similarly situated, alleges the suit. Crown bears the burden of proving that its tobacco surcharge is lawful by showing that its wellness program fully complies with every requirement under ERISA. Charging participants a tobacco surcharge while not informing them of a reasonable alternative standard that makes available the "full reward," and failing to provide proper notice, makes the surcharge facially noncompliant, adds the complaint.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Connett, Esq. Oren Faircloth, Esq. William H. Payne, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 700 S Flower Street, Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90017 E-mail: mconnett@sirillp.com ofaircloth@sirillp.com wpayne@sirillp.com CUROLOGY INC: Powell Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website --------------------------------------------------------- Maria Powell, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. CUROLOGY, INC., Case No. 1:26-cv-05887 (S.D.N.Y., July 13, 2026), is brought arising from Defendant's failure to design, maintain, and operate its website, www.curology.com (the "Website"), in a manner accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals in violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), the New York State Human Rights Law ("NYSHRL"), the New York Civil Rights Law ("NYCRL"), and the New York City Human Rights Law ("NYCHRL"). The Plaintiff specifically sought out Defendant's Website because Defendant promotes branded skincare products, routines, and direct-to consumer purchasing features that she wished to access independently. As a blind consumer, she depends on accessible digital interfaces to make informed purchasing decisions, review product details, compare skincare offerings, and complete transactions privately and independently. Defendant's failure to provide a WCAG-compliant Website denied her equal access to the same services offered to sighted users. the Plaintiff remains highly motivated to return to www.curology.com and complete her intended purchases once the Website is made accessible. Her intent to return is concrete, particularized, and ongoing: she still intends to purchase Gentle Cleanser and Gel Moisturizer through Defendant's Website. The Defendant's ongoing failure to provide accessible digital services constitutes a denial of full and equal access under Title III of the ADA and under New York State and City law, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a legally blind consumer residing in Bronx County, New York. CUROLOGY, INC., upon information and belief, owns and operates www.curology.com, a nationwide e-commerce platform offering skincare products and related services to consumers across the United States, including New York.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Robert L. Schonfeld, Esq. JOSEPH & NORINSBERG, LLC 825 Third Avenue, Suite 2100 New York, NY 10022 Phone: (212) 227-5700 Fax: (212) 656-1889 Email: rschonfeld@employeejustice.com CYMBIOTIKA LLC: Powell Balks at Blind-Inaccessible Website ---------------------------------------------------------- MARIA POWELL, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CYMBIOTIKA, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-05850 (S.D.N.Y., July 10, 2026) arises from the Defendant's failure to design, maintain, and operate its website, www.cymbiotika.com in a manner accessible to Plaintiff and other blind and visually impaired individuals in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York City Human Rights Law, and the New York State Civil Rights Law. On March 12, 2026, Plaintiff Powell visited Defendant's website using screen-reading software with the intent to purchase Defendant's Liquid Colostrum product for her own use. While navigating the website, Ms. Powell attempted to access the product page, review the product descriptions and benefits, identify the listed pricing, understand the visual comparison between Defendant's product and so-called "typical colostrum products," and activate the controls needed to add the item to her cart. At each step, she encountered disabling access barriers that prevented her from completing these tasks independently. Specifically, when Ms. Powell's screen-reading software attempted to read the Liquid Colostrum page, it encountered images and graphical content lacking meaningful alternative text. As a result, Ms. Powell could not understand the visual product depictions, packaging, comparison graphics, or other visually presented information describing the nature, appearance, and promoted features of Liquid Colostrum, says the suit. Cymbiotika, LLC owns the website that operates as a wellness company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Robert Schonfeld, Esq. JOSEPH & NORINSBERG, LLC 825 Third Avenue, Suite 2100 New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 227-5700 Facsimile: (212) 656-1889 E-mail: rschonfeld@employeejustice.com DEUTSCHE BANK: Loses Bid to Junk Amended Securities Suit Complaint ------------------------------------------------------------------ In the case captioned as Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 23-cv-05095-JGK (S.D.N.Y.), Judge John G. Koeltl of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied the Defendants' motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint. The Plaintiffs, Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System, Ohio Carpenters Pension Fund, and Hehmeyer LLC, brought a putative class action against Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc, Citigroup, RBC, HSBC, and Morgan Stanley entities, alleging a conspiracy to fix and manipulate prices of United Kingdom government bonds, known as Gilts, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The Plaintiffs allege the Defendants used private online chatrooms between 2009 and 2013 to coordinate Gilt allocations in the primary market, prices in the secondary market, and prices of related futures and options. The Court dismissed the original complaint in September 2024, finding that Oklahoma Firefighters, then the sole plaintiff, had failed to plead direct evidence of a conspiracy or sufficient circumstantial allegations connecting specific defendants to coordinated pricing. Oklahoma Firefighters, joined by Ohio Carpenters and Hehmeyer, filed an Amended Complaint in September 2025. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc then moved to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court found the Amended Complaint remedied the deficiencies identified earlier. The Plaintiffs cited more than eighty pages of chatroom transcripts in which traders allegedly agreed to inflate or suppress Gilt prices, coordinate trading strategy, and allocate positions in primary market auctions. According to the Court, exchanges in which traders discussed plans to build the brick wall around a specific price point, together with references to pumping up prices and slamming the market, plausibly reflected coordinated efforts rather than ordinary trading jargon when read in context. The Amended Complaint also relied on findings from a United Kingdom Competition and Markets Authority investigation that concluded with infringement decisions and fines against the Defendants, statistical analyses showing wider bid-ask spreads during the class period, and allegations concerning the structure of the Gilt market. The Court rejected the argument that Deutsche Bank Securities Inc could not be held liable absent allegations that its own traders joined the chats, finding it plausible that the entity served as Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft's United States distributor and transmitted the allegedly manipulated prices to American customers. The Court also rejected arguments that the alleged conspiracy was economically implausible, that the cited chats were too limited in scope or failed to reference United States counterparties, and that the Amended Complaint lacked adequate circumstantial evidence, holding that a plausible allegation of direct evidence made the latter showing unnecessary. On statute of limitations, the Court held the Plaintiffs adequately pleaded fraudulent concealment tolling. It found price-fixing conspiracies are inherently self-concealing and that the Amended Complaint cited chats in which traders instructed each other not to disclose their communications. The Court also held that the Competition and Markets Authority's 2018 investigation announcement did not place the Plaintiffs on inquiry notice, since it addressed conduct in the United Kingdom market rather than the domestic injury alleged here. On antitrust standing, the Court found the Plaintiffs plausibly alleged antitrust injury by identifying specific transactions in which they paid inflated prices or received suppressed prices. It rejected the argument that Hehmeyer, which traded Gilt futures rather than the underlying bonds, was not an efficient enforcer, citing Second Circuit precedent recognizing that futures traders may suffer sufficiently direct injuries. Finally, the Court held it had specific personal jurisdiction over Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, both because the Amended Complaint alleged direct transactions with United States accounts and because Deutsche Bank Securities Inc allegedly acted as its United States sales channel, receiving prices from Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft and relaying them to domestic customers. A copy of the Court's decision is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=vhqiS4 from PacerMonitor.com EAT REAL: Underpays Restaurant Staff, Linares Suit Claims --------------------------------------------------------- ORQUIDEA DE JESUS LINARES and JOSE BISMARK MIRANDA LOPEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. EAT REAL TACOS LLC, TM HARLEM INC., TACO MIX LLC, MI MEXICO DO CORP., FOOD U CORP., PUEBLA DELIV CORP., RANCHO GR CORP., TACO MIX BRONX TERMINAL INC., JORGE SANCHEZ, and JUANA SANCHEZ, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-05843 (S.D.N.Y., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law including failure to pay overtime wages, failure to pay spread-of-hours pay, failure to provide wage notices, and failure to provide accurate wage statements. Plaintiff De Jesus Linares worked for the Defendants as a cashier from approximately February 2019 to May 2026, while Plaintiff Miranda Lopez worked for the Defendants as a food preparer and cook from March 13, 2022, to June 23, 2026. Eat Real Tacos LLC is a restaurant owner and operator located at 234 E 116th Street, New York, New York. TM Harlem Inc. is a restaurant owner and operator located at 234 E 116th Street, New York, New York. Taco Mix LLC is a restaurant owner and operator located at 234 E 116th Street, New York, New York. Food U Corp. is a restaurant owner and operator located at 234 E 116th Street, New York, New York. Mi Mexico Do Corp. is a New York corporation located at 1986 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York. Puebla Deliv Corp. is a New York corporation located at 1986 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York. Rancho GR Corp. is a restaurant owner and operator located at 234 E 116th Street, New York, New York. Taco Mix Bronx Terminal Inc. is a restaurant owner and operator located at 610 Exterior Street B Building, Level 4, Bronx, New York. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Louis Pechman, Esq. Miguel Tapia Colin, Esq. PECHMAN LAW GROUP, PLLC 488 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 583-9500 Email: pechman@pechmanlaw.com tapiacolin@pechmanlaw.com ECOBAT RESOURCES: Faces Nunez Employment Suit in Cal. Super. ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ecobat Resources US, LLC. The case is captioned as Gamaliel Nunez, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated employees v. Ecobat Resources US, LLC, Case No. 26STCV19329 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit arises from employment-related issues. Ecobat Resources US, LLC is a major division and operating arm of Ecobat, a global leader in the collection, recycling, and production of energy storage materials, lead, and polypropylene products. The company specializes in sustainable, closed-loop battery recycling.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. ELECTROLUX CONSUMER: Reato Suit Referred to Magistrate Judge ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Reato v. Electrolux Consumer Products Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-02142-CSB-EIL (C.D. Ill.), the Court entered an order referring case to a United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Electrolux Consumer Products is a subsidiary and operating entity of the global Electrolux Group, manufacturing and distributing home and kitchen appliances worldwide. A copy of the Court's order dated July 9, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=j4CSMI at no extra charge.[CC] EMERALD SOCAL: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, Kizhakadathu Says --------------------------------------------------------------- JOEL KIZHAKADATHU, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Plaintiff v. EMERALD SOCAL, LLC, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV21750 (Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., Cal., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for recovery of unpaid wages and penalties under California Business and Professions Code, Labor Code, and Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders. The complaint relates that throughout Plaintiff's employment with Defendants, Defendants' timekeeping and/or payroll policies and practices resulted in Plaintiff and other non-exempt employees not being compensated for all hours actually worked. Plaintiff and other non-exempt employees regularly worked more than eight hours in a workday or 40 hours in a workweek. At times, Defendants required Plaintiff and other non-exempt employees to perform work before their scheduled shifts, after their scheduled shifts, and/or during off-the-clock meal breaks, and failed to compensate employees for this time. Defendants also failed to incorporate multiple rates of pay and/or all non-discretionary remuneration into the regular rate of pay. As a result, Plaintiff and other non-exempt employees were not compensated for all earned minimum and overtime wages. The Defendants failed to compensate them with the required rest period premium(s) for each workday there was a rest period violation as mandated by Labor Code. Additionally, Defendants violated Labor Code by failing to incorporate multiple rates of pay and/or all non-discretionary remuneration into the paid sick leave pay rate. Moreover, as a result of Defendants' failure to pay all minimum, overtime, sick leave wages, failure to pay all meal and rest period premium wages, and unlawful timekeeping and payroll practices as alleged above, Defendants maintained inaccurate payroll records and issued inaccurate wage statements to Plaintiff and other non-exempt employees. Defendants also failed to timely pay all final wages to former non-exempt employees upon their separation of employment from Defendants, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and restitution. Plaintiff JOEL KIZHAKADATHU was employed by Defendants as a non-exempt employee. Defendants own and operate hospital linen cleaning and laundry facilities in California, including in Los Angeles County.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: William C. Sung, Esq. Tiffany L. Luu, Esq. Joseph C. Ramli, Esq. Guneez Ibrahim, Esq. JUSTICE FOR WORKERS, P.C. 9575 Bolsa Avenue Westminster, CA 92683 Telephone: 323-922-2000 Facsimile: 323-922-2000 E-mail: william@justiceforworkers.com E-mail: tluu@justiceforworkers.com E-mail: jramli@justiceforworkers.com E-mail: gibrahim@justiceforworkers.com ENERGIZER HOLDINGS: Joint Bid to Stay Discovery in Copeland OK'd ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as DON COPELAND et al., v. ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC., and WALMART, INC., Case No. 5:23-cv-02087-PCP (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge P. Casey Pitts entered an order granting the stipulation to stay discovery and modify schedule pending decision on the Plaintiffs' motions for class certification. 1. No depositions will take place and no new written discovery will be propounded between today and Sept. 25, 2026; 2. If the Court has not ruled on any of the Pending Motions by Sept. 25, 2026, the Parties shall meet and confer to discuss whether a further stay and modification to the case schedule is warranted; 3. All case deadlines are extended by approximately 120 days, as adjusted for federal holidays, as indicated in the modified schedule below: Deadline Proposed discovery stay lifted; Parties to Sept. 25, 2026 confer re whether further stay warranted: Close of fact discovery: Dec. 22, 2026 Expert reports on merits and damages under March 8, 2027 Rule 26(a)(2) for issues where that party bears the burden of proof: Close of expert discovery: July 1, 2027 Deadline for summary judgment/Daubert Sept. 2, 2027 motions: Summary judgment/Daubert motions hearing: March 2, 2028 Trial-setting conference: June 20, 2028 Energizer manufactures dry cell batteries and flashlights. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=uE96bQ at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Daniel H. Silverman, Esq. Donna M. Evans, Esq. Daniel Gifford, Esq. COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 769 Centre Street, Suite 207 Boston, MA 02130 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 E-mail: dsilverman@cohenmilstein.com devans@cohenmilstein.com dgifford@cohenmilstein.com - and - Joshua P. Davis, Esq. Kyla J. Gibboney, Esq. Michael Dell'Angelo, Esq. BERGER MONTAGUE PC 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 625 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (800) 424-6690 E-mail: jdavis@bergermontague.com kgibboney@bergermontague.com mdellangelo@bergermontague.com - and - Todd M. Schneider, Esq. Jason H. Kim, Esq. J. Caleigh Macdonald, Esq. Matthew S. Weiler, Esq. SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KIM LLP 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1400 Emeryville, CA 94608 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 E-mail: mweiler@schneiderwallace.com jkim@schneiderwallace.com jmacdonald@schneiderwallace.com tschneider@schneiderwallace.com - and - Rosemary M. Rivas, Esq. Jeffrey Kosbie, Esq. GIBBS MURA LLP 1111 Broadway, Suite 2100 Oakland, California 94607 Telephone: (510) 350-9700 E-mail: rmr@classlawgroup.com jbk@classlawgroup.com - and - Kimberley C. Weber, Esq. MCCRACKEN STEMERMAN & HOLSBERRY LLP 475 14th Street, Suite 1200 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (415) 597-7200 E-mail: sgs@msh.law kweber@msh.law The Defendants are represented by: Christopher D. Dusseault, Esq. Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Esq. Samuel G. Liversidge, Esq. Sarah M. Kushner, Esq. Courtney L. Spears, Esq. Rachel S. Brass, Esq. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 E-mail: tboutrous@gibsondunn.com cdusseault@gibsondunn.com sliversidge@gibsondunn.com smkushner@gibsondunn.com cspears@gibsondunn.com rbrass@gibsondunn.com - and - Christopher S. Yates, Esq. Belinda S Lee, Esq. Brendan A. McShane, Esq. Ashley M. Bauer, Esq. Alicia R. Jovais, Esq. Lawrence E. Buterman, Esq. LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 E-mail: chris.yates@lw.com belinda.lee@lw.com brendan.mcshane@lw.com ashley.bauer@lw.com alicia.jovais@lw.com lawrence.buterman@lw.com ENERGIZER HOLDINGS: Joint Bid to Stay Discovery in PPI OK'd ----------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as PORTABLE POWER, INC., et al., v. ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC., and WALMART, INC., Case No. 5:23-cv-02091-PCP (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge P. Casey Pitts entered an order granting the stipulation to stay discovery and modify schedule pending decision on the Plaintiffs' motions for class certification. 1. No depositions will take place and no new written discovery will be propounded between today and Sept. 25, 2026; 2. If the Court has not ruled on any of the Pending Motions by Sept. 25, 2026, the Parties shall meet and confer to discuss whether a further stay and modification to the case schedule is warranted; 3. All case deadlines are extended by approximately 120 days, as adjusted for federal holidays, as indicated in the modified schedule below: Deadline Proposed discovery stay lifted; Parties to Sept. 25, 2026 confer re whether further stay warranted: Close of fact discovery: Dec. 22, 2026 Expert reports on merits and damages under March 8, 2027 Rule 26(a)(2) for issues where that party bears the burden of proof: Close of expert discovery: July 1, 2027 Deadline for summary judgment/Daubert Sept. 2, 2027 motions: Summary judgment/Daubert motions hearing: March 2, 2028 Trial-setting conference: June 20, 2028 Energizer manufactures dry cell batteries and flashlights. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=tbqla5 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Daniel H. Silverman, Esq. Donna M. Evans, Esq. Daniel Gifford, Esq. COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 769 Centre Street, Suite 207 Boston, MA 02130 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 E-mail: dsilverman@cohenmilstein.com devans@cohenmilstein.com dgifford@cohenmilstein.com - and - Joshua P. Davis, Esq. Kyla J. Gibboney, Esq. Michael Dell'Angelo, Esq. BERGER MONTAGUE PC 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 625 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (800) 424-6690 E-mail: jdavis@bergermontague.com kgibboney@bergermontague.com mdellangelo@bergermontague.com - and - Todd M. Schneider, Esq. Jason H. Kim, Esq. J. Caleigh Macdonald, Esq. Matthew S. Weiler, Esq. SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KIM LLP 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1400 Emeryville, CA 94608 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 E-mail: mweiler@schneiderwallace.com jkim@schneiderwallace.com jmacdonald@schneiderwallace.com tschneider@schneiderwallace.com - and - Rosemary M. Rivas, Esq. Jeffrey Kosbie, Esq. GIBBS MURA LLP 1111 Broadway, Suite 2100 Oakland, California 94607 Telephone: (510) 350-9700 E-mail: rmr@classlawgroup.com jbk@classlawgroup.com - and - Kimberley C. Weber, Esq. MCCRACKEN STEMERMAN & HOLSBERRY LLP 475 14th Street, Suite 1200 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (415) 597-7200 E-mail: sgs@msh.law kweber@msh.law The Defendants are represented by: Christopher D. Dusseault, Esq. Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Esq. Samuel G. Liversidge, Esq. Sarah M. Kushner, Esq. Courtney L. Spears, Esq. Rachel S. Brass, Esq. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 E-mail: tboutrous@gibsondunn.com cdusseault@gibsondunn.com sliversidge@gibsondunn.com smkushner@gibsondunn.com cspears@gibsondunn.com rbrass@gibsondunn.com - and - Christopher S. Yates, Esq. Belinda S Lee, Esq. Brendan A. McShane, Esq. Ashley M. Bauer, Esq. Alicia R. Jovais, Esq. Lawrence E. Buterman, Esq. LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 E-mail: chris.yates@lw.com belinda.lee@lw.com brendan.mcshane@lw.com ashley.bauer@lw.com alicia.jovais@lw.com lawrence.buterman@lw.com ENERGIZER HOLDINGS: Joint Bid to Stay Discovery in Schuman OK'd --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as KIMBERLY SCHUMAN et al. v. ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.; and WALMART, INC., Case No. 5:23-cv-02093-PCP (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge P. Casey Pitts entered an order granting the stipulation to stay discovery and modify schedule pending decision on the Plaintiffs' motions for class certification. 1. No depositions will take place and no new written discovery will be propounded between today and Sept. 25, 2026; 2. If the Court has not ruled on any of the Pending Motions by Sept. 25, 2026, the Parties shall meet and confer to discuss whether a further stay and modification to the case schedule is warranted; 3. All case deadlines are extended by approximately 120 days, as adjusted for federal holidays, as indicated in the modified schedule below: Deadline Proposed discovery stay lifted; Parties to Sept. 25, 2026 confer re whether further stay warranted: Close of fact discovery: Dec. 22, 2026 Expert reports on merits and damages under March 8, 2027 Rule 26(a)(2) for issues where that party bears the burden of proof: Close of expert discovery: July 1, 2027 Deadline for summary judgment/Daubert Sept. 2, 2027 motions: Summary judgment/Daubert motions hearing: March 2, 2028 Trial-setting conference: June 20, 2028 Energizer manufactures dry cell batteries and flashlights. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=ydJfRx at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Daniel H. Silverman, Esq. Donna M. Evans, Esq. Daniel Gifford, Esq. COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 769 Centre Street, Suite 207 Boston, MA 02130 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 E-mail: dsilverman@cohenmilstein.com devans@cohenmilstein.com dgifford@cohenmilstein.com - and - Joshua P. Davis, Esq. Kyla J. Gibboney, Esq. Michael Dell'Angelo, Esq. BERGER MONTAGUE PC 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 625 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (800) 424-6690 E-mail: jdavis@bergermontague.com kgibboney@bergermontague.com mdellangelo@bergermontague.com - and - Todd M. Schneider, Esq. Jason H. Kim, Esq. J. Caleigh Macdonald, Esq. Matthew S. Weiler, Esq. SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KIM LLP 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1400 Emeryville, CA 94608 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 E-mail: mweiler@schneiderwallace.com jkim@schneiderwallace.com jmacdonald@schneiderwallace.com tschneider@schneiderwallace.com - and - Rosemary M. Rivas, Esq. Jeffrey Kosbie, Esq. GIBBS MURA LLP 1111 Broadway, Suite 2100 Oakland, California 94607 Telephone: (510) 350-9700 E-mail: rmr@classlawgroup.com jbk@classlawgroup.com - and - Kimberley C. Weber, Esq. MCCRACKEN STEMERMAN & HOLSBERRY LLP 475 14th Street, Suite 1200 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (415) 597-7200 E-mail: sgs@msh.law kweber@msh.law The Defendants are represented by: Christopher D. Dusseault, Esq. Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Esq. Samuel G. Liversidge, Esq. Sarah M. Kushner, Esq. Courtney L. Spears, Esq. Rachel S. Brass, Esq. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 E-mail: tboutrous@gibsondunn.com cdusseault@gibsondunn.com sliversidge@gibsondunn.com smkushner@gibsondunn.com cspears@gibsondunn.com rbrass@gibsondunn.com - and - Christopher S. Yates, Esq. Belinda S Lee, Esq. Brendan A. McShane, Esq. Ashley M. Bauer, Esq. Alicia R. Jovais, Esq. Lawrence E. Buterman, Esq. LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 E-mail: chris.yates@lw.com belinda.lee@lw.com brendan.mcshane@lw.com ashley.bauer@lw.com alicia.jovais@lw.com lawrence.buterman@lw.com ESPANOLA PUBLIC: Dominguez Files FCRA Suit in D. New Mexico ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Espanola Public Schools. The case is styled as Daniel Dominguez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Espanola Public Schools, Case No. 1:26-cv-02282-SCY-LF (D.N.M., July 14, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Espanola Public Schools (EPS) -- https://www.k12espanola.org/ -- is a school district based in Espanola, New Mexico, USA.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Rob Treinen, Esq. TREINEN LAW OFFICE 500 Tijeras Ave NW Albuquerque, NM 87102 Phone: (505) 247-1980 Fax: (505) 843-7129 Email: robtreinen@treinenlawoffice.com EXPERIAN INFORMATION: Removes Aufrichtig Suit to C.D. Cal. ---------------------------------------------------------- The Defendant in the case captioned as MEAGHAN AUFRICHTIG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant, filed a notice to remove the lawsuit from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange (Case No. 30-2026-01575676-CU-BT-CXC) to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on July 17, 2026. The Clerk of Court for the Central District of California assigned Case No. 8:26-cv-01918 to the proceeding. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. operates as an information services company. The Company offers credit information, analytical tools, and marketing services. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Ryan D. Ball, Esq. John A. Vogt, Esq. GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 450 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (949) 743-3400 Facsimile: (949) 743-3485 Email: RBall@goodwinlaw.com JAVogt@goodwinlaw.com - and - Lora J. Krsulich, Esq. GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 426-2500 Facsimile: (213) 623-1673 Email: lkrsulich@goodwinlaw.com FAST WATER: Faces Cronk Wage-and-Hour Suit in C.D. Cal. ------------------------------------------------------- JOSESITO CRONK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. FAST WATER HEATER PARTNERS I LP D/B/A FAST WATER HEATER COMPANY and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 2:26-cv-07756 (C.D. Cal., July 15, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for violations of California Labor Code and California's Business and Professions Code including failure to pay for all hours worked, failure to pay overtime wages, failure to provide and/or make available meal periods, failure to authorize and permit rest periods, failure to provide timely and accurate itemized wage statements, waiting time penalties, unlawful business practices, and failure to provide employee records. The Plaintiff worked for the Defendants as a Lead Tech in Richmond, California from approximately April 2020 to December 29, 2025. Fast Water Heater Partners I LP, doing business as Fast Water Heater Company, is a provider of residential and commercial water heater installation, replacement, and repair services based in Kirkland, Washington. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Carolyn H. Cottrell, Esq. Esther L. Bylsma, Esq. SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KIM LLP 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1400 Emeryville, CA 94608 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 Facsimile: (415) 421-7105 Email: ccottrell@schneiderwallace.com ebylsma@schneiderwallace.com FC 111 N STREET: Abyaneh Files Suit in D.C. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against FC 111 N Street SE LLC, et al. The case is styled as Lida Abyaneh, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. FC 111 N Street SE LLC, Brookfield Properties FC (USA II) LLC, Urby LLC, Case No. 2026-CAB-004794 (D.C. Super. Ct., July 10, 2026). The case type is stated as "General Civil." FC 111 N St SE LLC is a limited liability company formed in Delaware on January 21, 2020, associated with real estate and development parcels.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Brendan James Klaproth, Esq. KLAPROTH LAW PLLC 2300 Wisconsin Avenue NW Suite 100A Washington, DC 20007 Phone: 202-618-2344 Email: Bklaproth@klaprothlaw.com FIRST NATIONAL HOLDINGS: Ray Files Suit in N.D. Illinois -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against First National Holdings, LLC. The case is styled as Donna Ray, individually and on behalf of herself, and all others similarly situated v. First National Holdings, LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-08233 (N.D. Ill., July 13, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Contract Dispute. First National Holdings, LLC is a Chicago-based specialty finance company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mark K. Svensson, Esq. MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN PLLC 405 East 50th Street New York, NY 10022 Phone: (202) 975-0468 Email: msvensson@zlk.com - and - Gary M. Klinger, Esq. MILBERG PLLC 227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2100 Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: (866) 252-0878 Email: gklinger@milberg.com FIRST NATIONAL: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Baca Suit Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------ KEVIN BACA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. FIRST NATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-08501 (N.D. Ill., July 17, 2026) is an action arising from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard the private information that was entrusted to it, and its accompanying responsibility to store and transfer that information. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, the Defendant owed Plaintiff and Class Members a duty to take all reasonable and necessary measures to keep the Private Information collected safe and secure from unauthorized access. The Defendant solicited, collected, used, and derived a benefit from the Private Information, yet breached its duty by failing to implement or maintain adequate security practices. The Defendant failed to use reasonable security procedures and practice appropriate to the nature of the sensitive, unencrypted information they maintained for Plaintiff and Class Members, causing the exposure of Plaintiff and Class Members' private information. As a result of the Defendant's inadequate digital security and notice process, the Plaintiff and Class Members' private information was exposed to criminals, says the suit. First National Holdings, LLC is a specialty finance company that purchases, services, and finances delinquent property tax liens. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jeff Ostrow, Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW, P.A. One W Las Olas Blvd, Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-4100 Email: ostrow@kolawyers.com FLYNT MANAGEMENT: Faces Escobar Personal Injury Suit in Cal. Super. ------------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Flynt Management Group, LLC. The case is captioned as Kattia Escobar, on behalf of herself individually and all others similarly situated employees v. Flynt Management Group, LLC, Case No. 26STCV19363 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit is related to issues of personal injury and property damage. Flynt Management Group, LLC operates as a broadcasting company. The Company specializes in adult entertainment in sexual wellness retail space to purchase the lovers brand, retail stores, and e-commerce businesses. Flynt Management Group serves customers in the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Daniel Srourian, Esq. FREIGHT BREAKERS: Johnson Files Suit Over Unpaid Wages ------------------------------------------------------ JAREL JOHNSON AND JARVIS WASHINGTON, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs v. FREIGHT BREAKERS, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 5:26-cv-00149 (W.D.N.C., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to pay overtime wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Defendant Freight Breakers, LLC provides managed end-to-end production-based services in distribution centers and warehouses; provides its customers with Lumpers to unload and load freight in its customers' warehouses and distribution centers. It operates and provides Lumpers to customers in many states across the United States, including in Florida, Pennsylvania, Texas, Illinois, and Maryland. Plaintiffs Jarel Johnson and Jarvis Washington worked for Freight Breakers as Lumpers from approximately January 2026 through March 2026. The complaint relates that Freight Breakers employed Lumpers in Ocala, Florida to load and unload boxes from its customers' trailers. Freight Breakers paid Lumpers a combination of a piece rate for each box they loaded and unloaded and an hourly rate for certain periods of downtime. In some weeks, Lumpers worked in excess of 40 hours. Despite the long hours, Freight Breakers did not pay Lumpers overtime wages for all hours worked over 40 in a week. Freight Breakers also failed to pay Lumpers the Florida State minimum wage for each hour worked in some weeks, the complaint asserts. The Plaintiffs seek unpaid overtime wages, liquidated and statutory damages, costs and attorneys' fees, service awards, as well as declaratory relief under the FLSA. They also seek unpaid minimum wages, liquidated damages, prejudgment interest, costs and attorneys' fees, service awards, and declaratory relief pursuant to the Fla. Const. and the Florida Minimum Wage Act.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Timothy Coffield, Esq. COFFIELD PLC 123 East Main Street, Suite 100 #8 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Direct: 434-218-3133 Facsimile: 434-321-1636 E-mail: tc@coffieldlaw.com - and - Rebecca King, Esq. Jason Steuerwald, Esq. GETMAN, SWEENEY & DUNN PLLC 260 Fair St. Kingston, NY 12401 Telephone: (845) 255-9370 Facsimile: (845)255-8649 E-mail: rking@getmansweeney.com E-mail: jsteuerwald@getmansweeney.com GEICO GENERAL: Allowed Leave to File Sur-Reply in Marcelletti ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Marcelletti v. GEICO General Insurance Company, Case No. 6:23-cv-06211 (W.D.N.Y., Filed April 17, 2023), the Hon. Judge Elizabeth A. Wolford entered an order: Granting Motion for Leave to File a Response to Supplemental Authority; and Granting Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply. On July 2, 2026, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a response to Defendant's fourth notice of supplemental authority in opposition to Plaintiff's amended motion for class certification, appointment of class representative, and appointment of class counsel. The Plaintiff may file his supplemental response, currently filed in proposed form, on the docket or before July 17, 2026. In addition, on July 10, 2026, Defendant moved for leave to file a sur-reply to Plaintiff's motion to strike and/or exclude portions of Dr. Jonathan Tomlin's testimony and expert report. The Defendant may file its proposed sur-reply, currently filed in proposed form, on the docket or before July 17, 2026. The nature of suit states Diversity-Breach of Contract. Geico operates as an insurance company.[CC] GOOGLE LLC: Hachette Balks at Reproduction of Copyrighted Works --------------------------------------------------------------- HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC., CENGAGE LEARNING, INC., ELSEVIER INC., SCOTT TUROW, AND S.C.R.I.B.E., INC., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-05870 (S.D.N.Y., July 10, 2026) alleges copyright infringement based on Google's unauthorized reproduction of Plaintiffs' and the Class' works. According to the complaint, Google first illegally copied millions of books and journal articles to assemble a vast trove of copyrighted materials for its own commercial use. It did this by copying works obtained for strictly limited use in Google Books and other Google services, and downloading unauthorized web scrapes of virtually the entire Internet. Google then copied those stolen works many times over to train its multi-billion-dollar generative AI system called Gemini. Compounding the assault, Google then deployed a purpose-built service designed to generate content that directly substitutes for Plaintiffs' and the Class' original works. The Plaintiffs and the Class are authors and publishers that own or control exclusive rights under copyright to millions of the world's best-known and bestselling written works. Authorized copies of Plaintiffs' and the Class' books are widely available for purchase or license. Yet Google chose unauthorized sources. That is particularly egregious given that Google is well-aware of the licensing market for AI training materials and already licenses content for training, asserts the suit. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and a proposed Class, pursuant to the Copyright Act and the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, to stop Google's infringement and preserve the important work of authors, publishers, and the literary ecosystem more broadly. Google LLC is an American multinational technology corporation focused on information technology, online advertising, search engine technology, email, cloud computing, software, quantum computing, e-commerce, consumer electronics, and artificial intelligence.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Matthew J. Oppenheim, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gould, Esq. OPPENHEIM + ZEBRAK, LLP 4530 Wisconsin Ave, NW, 5th Floor Washington, DC 20016 Telephone: (202) 480-2999 E-mail: matt@oandzlaw.com jeff@oandzlaw.com - and - Daryl L. Kleiman, Esq. Edward Crouse, Esq. Eli Goldman, Esq. OPPENHEIM + ZEBRAK, LLP 491 Fifth Avenue, 19th Floor New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 951-1156 E-mail: dkleiman@oandzlaw.com ecrouse@oandzlaw.com egoldman@oandzlaw.com - and - Derek W. Loeser, Esq. Benjamin Gould, Esq. Chris N. Ryder, Esq. KELLER ROHRBACK 1201 Third Avenue, Ste 3400 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-1900 E-mail: dloeser@kellerrohrback.com bgould@kellerrohrback.com cryder@kellerrohrback.com GYMREAPERS LLC: Faces Dalton Suit Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ----------------------------------------------------------------- JULIE DALTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. GYMREAPERS LLC, Defendant, Case No. 0:26-cv-03237 (D. Minn., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually impaired persons. The Defendant's website, www.gymreapers.com, contains access barriers which hinder the Plaintiff and Class members to enjoy the benefits of their online goods, content, and services offered to the public through the website. The Plaintiff and Class members seek permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that its website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals. Gymreapers LLC is a company that sells online goods and services in Minnesota. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Patrick W. Michenfelder, Esq. Chad A. Throndset, Esq. Jason Gustafson, Esq. THRONDSET MICHENFELDER, LLC 80 S. 8th Street, Suite 900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (763) 515-6110 Email: pat@throndsetlaw.com chad@throndsetlaw.com jason@throndsetlaw.com HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS: Faces Solano Employment Suit in Cal. Super. ------------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Healthcare Investments Inc. also known as Rosecrans Care Center. The case is captioned as Stephany Noemi Solano, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated employees v. Healthcare Investments, Inc., Case No. 26STCV19360 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit arises from employment-related issues. Healthcare Investments Inc. is the legal business name and corporate entity associated with Rosecrans Care Center, a 113-bed skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility located at 1140 W. Rosecrans Avenue in Gardena, California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Marlis Brent, Esq. HONEY SCIENCE: Campbell Appeals Amended Suit Dismissal to 9th Cir. ------------------------------------------------------------------ TOM CAMPBELL, et al. are taking an appeal from a court order dismissing the lawsuit entitled Tom Campbell, et al., individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Honey Science, LLC, et al., Defendants, Case No. 5:25-cv-02850-PCP, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Plaintiffs allege that Honey failed to apply the best available coupon to their purchases, and that Honey received a commission for every purchase made after a user searched for a coupon code through the browser extension, whether or not a code was applied. On Jan. 26, 2026, the Plaintiffs filed third amended complaint, which the Defendants moved to dismiss on Mar. 12, 2026. On June 15, 2026, Judge P. Casey Pitts entered an Order granting the Defendants' motion to dismiss. Because the Plaintiffs have been provided with several opportunities to state a valid claim but have continually failed to do so, dismissal is with prejudice and without further leave to amend. The appellate case is styled as Campbell, et al. v. Honey, et al., Case No. 26-4493, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed on July 15, 2026. The briefing schedule in the Appellate Case states that: -- Appellant's Mediation Questionnaire was due on July 20, 2026; -- Appellant's Appeal Transcript Order was due on July 27, 2026; -- Appellant's Appeal Transcript is due on August 26, 2026; -- Appellant's Opening Brief is due on October 5, 2026; and -- Appellee's Answering Brief is due on November 4, 2026. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellants TOM CAMPBELL, et al., individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, are represented by: David J. Gallo, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF DAVID J. GALLO 12702 Via Cortina, Ste. 500 Del Mar, CA 92014 Defendants-Appellees HONEY, et al. are represented by: Clement S. Roberts, Esq. ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105 - and - Jennifer Keighley, Esq. Marc Shapiro, Esq. Richard Jacobsen, Esq. ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 51 W. 52nd Street New York, NY 10019 IKEA DISTRIBUTION: Adams Consumer Suit Removed to N.D. Ill. ----------------------------------------------------------- JOHN ADAMS, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, v. IKEA DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC.; IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES LLC; IKEA US RETAIL LLC; IKEA PROPERTY, INC.; and IKEA SUPPLY AG, was removed from the Illinois Circuit Court of Cook County to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on June 17, 2026. The Clerk of the Northern District of Illinois assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-07154 to the proceeding. According to the lawsuit, the Defendants advertise, market, sell, and distribute consumer products throughout the United States in physical retail stores, through IKEA's website and mobile application, and that Defendants source a substantial majority of the products they sell from manufacturers and producers located in China, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Poland and elsewhere abroad. The complaint alleges that Defendants raised retail prices to offset IEEPA tariff costs, passing those costs onto consumers through inflated prices during the class period from February 4, 2025 through February 24, 2026. Adams is a resident of Illinois who purchased IKEA products imported into the United States by or for Defendants. Ikea Distribution was founded in 1989. The Company's line of business includes distributing furniture.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Michael T. Layden, Esq. David G. Jorgensen, Esq. CROKE FAIRCHILD DUARTE & BERES, LLC 191 N. Wacker Dr., 31st Floor Chicago, Illinois 60606 Telephone: (312) 650-8650 Email: mlayden@crokefairchild.com djorgensen@crokefairchild.com - and - Marcel S. Pratt, Esq. BALLARD SPAHR LLP 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 665-8500 Email: prattm@ballardspahr.com INSTRUCTURE INC: Vallera Sues Over Lost Access to Canvas FFT Course ------------------------------------------------------------------- FARAH L. VALLERA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. INSTRUCTURE, INC., Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-00652-RJS (D. Utah, July 12, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for negligence, breach of implied contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The case arises from the Defendant's action of disabling Canvas Free-for-Teacher ("FFT"), a teaching infrastructure and repository, and user's access to all stored information following a data breach in May 2026. According to the complaint, the Defendant failed to properly and timely notify the Plaintiff and Class members that it was disabling Canvas FFT and failed to properly and timely notify them of their ability to download their property from the Canvas platform. As a result of the Defendant's action, the Plaintiff and the Class suffered direct, non-duplicative loss of use, recovery costs, rebuild or migration costs, substitute-platform expenses, or professional interruption. Instructure, Inc. is an education-technology company headquartered in Utah. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Charles H. Thronson, Esq. PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER 201 South Main Street, Ste. 1800 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 532-1234 Email: CThronson@parsonbehle.com INTUIT INC: Baldwin Seeks Damages Over Share Price Drop ------------------------------------------------------- SANJIV BALDWIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. INTUIT INC., SASAN K. GOODARZI, and SANDEEP S. AUJLA, Defendants, Case No. 3:26-cv-07086 (N.D. Cal., July 10, 2026) is a federal securities class action on behalf of the Plaintiff and a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired Intuit securities between August 22, 2025 and May 20, 2026, both dates inclusive, seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants' violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials. Throughout the Class Period, the Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects, asserts the complaint. Specifically, the Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) they had overstated Intuit's competitive advantages and growth, as well as the overall strength and sustainability of its business model and operations; (ii) in reality, Intuit was losing significant business in its tax-related business, particularly in its Turbo Tax brand name business, as a result of, inter alia, increasing competitive and pricing pressures; (iii) accordingly, Intuit's previously issued fiscal full year 2026 TurboTax revenue growth guidance was unreliable and/or unrealistic; and (iv) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. The truth began to emerge on May 20, 2026, when, during pre-market hours, Reuters published an article entitled "Intuit to cut 17% of global jobs to streamline operations, memo shows." Citing an internal Company memorandum and email from Defendant Sasan K. Goodarzi, Intuit's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, to staff earlier in the day, the article reported that "Intuit is laying off about 17% of its workforce, or about 3,000 employees worldwide, to streamline operations and sharpen focus on its key bets including its AI efforts." The article further revealed that Intuit "is also winding down its Reno and Woodland Hills offices as ⁠part of a strategic restructuring to consolidate teams in key hubs, according to the memo." On this news, Intuit's stock price fell $15.78 per share, or 3.95%, to close at $383.93 per share on May 20, 2026. The same day, Intuit announced its fiscal third quarter 2026 results, disclosing among other things, weak Q3 2026 tax season revenue, including TurboTax revenue that grew by only 7% year-over-year, versus consensus estimates of at least 8% revenue growth. Following these disclosures, Intuit's stock price fell $76.86 per share, or 20.02%, to close at $307.07 per share on May 21, 2026. As a result of the Defendants' wrongful acts and omissions, and the precipitous decline in the market value of the Company's securities, the Plaintiff and other Class members have suffered significant losses and damages, says the complaint. Intuit Inc. provides financial management, payments and capital, compliance, and marketing products and services in the U.S. The Company has four reportable business segments: (i) Global Business Solutions; (ii) Consumer; (iii) Credit Karma; and (iv) ProTax.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jennifer Pafiti, Esq. POMERANTZ LLP 1100 Glendon Avenue, 15th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90024 Telephone: (310) 405-7190 E-mail: jpafiti@pomlaw.com - and - Jeremy A. Lieberman, Esq. J. Alexander Hood II, Esq. POMERANTZ LLP 600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10016 Telephone: (212) 661-1100 Facsimile: (917) 463-1044 E-mail: jalieberman@pomlaw.com ahood@pomlaw.com - and - Brian Schall, Esq. Andrew Brown, Esq. SCHALL BROWN & SCHWARTZ LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 301-3335 E-mail: brian@schallfirm.com andrew@schallfirm.com KAYNE ANDERSON: Diapera Files Suit Over Unpaid Overtime Wages ------------------------------------------------------------- MAE JEAN DIAPERA, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. KAYNE ANDERSON RUDNICK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California limited liability company; VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, an entity of unknown form; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV21850 (Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., Cal., July 10, 2026) is a class action seeking to recover penalties pursuant to the California Labor Code. The complaint alleges that the Defendants failed to pay Plaintiff and the Class members for all hours worked and provided them with inaccurate wage statements that prevented Plaintiff and the Class from earning of these unlawful pay practices. Defendants also failed to provide Plaintiff and the Class with lawful meal and rest periods, as employees were not provided with the opportunity to take timely, uninterrupted, and duty-free meal and rest periods as required by the Labor Code. As a result, Plaintiff and the Class members worked substantial overtime hours during their employment with Defendants for which they were not compensated, in violation of the California Labor Code, and the applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order, says the suit. Plaintiff MAE JEAN DIAPERA was employed by Defendants as a non-exempt employee within the State of California. Defendant KAYNE ANDERSON RUDNICK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC is a California limited liability company with its principle executive offices in Los Angeles, California. Defendant VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS is an entity of unknown form with its principle executive offices in Los Angeles, California. DOES 1 through 50 are the Defendants with fictitious names.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Roman Shkodnik, Esq. Mason Doidge, Esq. D.LAW, INC. 250 N Madison Avenue, 2nd Floor Pasadena, CA 91101-1639 Telephone: (818) 962-6465 Facsimile: (818) 962-6469 E-mail: R.Shkodnik@d.law M.Doidge@d.law KIRIN TRANSPORTATION: Appeals Tossed New Trial Bid to 2nd Circuit ----------------------------------------------------------------- KIRIN TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al. are taking an appeal from a court order denying their motion for a new trial and to alter or amend the judgment in the lawsuit entitled Qian Wang, et al., individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kirin Transportation, Inc., et al., Defendants, Case No. 1:20-cv-5410, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The suit is brought against the Defendants for failure to pay minimum wages and failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. On Mar. 17, 2026, Judge Orelia E. Merchant entered an Order granting in part and denying in part the Plaintiffs' motion for attorney fees. The Plaintiffs are awarded $77,317.25 in attorney's fees and $5,259.45 in costs due jointly and severally from all Defendants. On Mar. 18, 2026, judgment is entered against the Defendants. On Apr. 16, 2026, the Defendants filed a motion for new trial alternatively, motion for judgement as a matter of law or motion to alter or amend the judgment, which Judge Merchant denied on June 16, 2026. Given the fact intensive nature of the inquiry and the evidentiary support for their finding, the jury's finding that The Plaintiffs were employees rather than independent contractors is not seriously erroneous or a miscarriage of justice. Accordingly, the Defendants' motion is denied on the merits to the extent it seeks an order granting a new trial. The Court finds that the portion of the Defendants' motion seeking to alter or amend the judgment likewise fails. The appellate case is styled as In Re: Wang Litigation, Case No. 26-1943, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed on July 17, 2026. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellees QIAN WANG, et al., individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, are represented by: Aaron B. Schweitzer, Esq. TROY LAW PLLC 41-25 Kissena Boulevard Flushing, NY 11355 Defendants-Appellants KIRIN TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al. are represented by: Kevin S. Wang, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF WOOD WANG & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 3907 Prince Street, Suite 2f Flushing, NY 11354 LAST BRAND: Intercepts Electronic Data Without Consent, Wright Says ------------------------------------------------------------------- AMY WRIGHT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. LAST BRAND, INC., Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-04009-AGS-VET (S.D. Cal., July 12, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act, common law invasion of privacy, and intrusion upon seclusion. The case arises from the Defendant's practice of intercepting, recording, decoding, capturing, disclosing, and using the contents of the Plaintiff's and Class members' electronic communications from its website to Meta Platforms, Inc. According to the complaint, the Defendant installed tracking technologies on its website which allows Meta to access users' electronic communications without consent. As a result of the Defendant's conduct, the Plaintiff and Class members have suffered injury, including the violation of their statutorily protected privacy interests, the loss of the right to control the dissemination and use of the contents of their communications, and the loss of the value of their private information. Last Brand, Inc. is a provider of housing and real estate services, with its principal place of business in California. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. Noah J. Larsh, Esq. SWIGART LAW GROUP, APC 2221 Camino del Rio S., Ste. 308 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (866) 219-3343 Email: Josh@SwigartLawGroup.com Noah@SwigartLawGroup.com - and - Daniel G. Shay, Esq. SHAY LEGAL, APC 2221 Camino del Rio S., Ste. 308 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (619) 222-7429 Email: Dan@ShayLegal.com LEARNING CARE: Removes McCoard Suit to W.D. Wash. ------------------------------------------------- The Defendant in the case of PAUL McCOARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. LEARNING CARE GROUP (US) NO. 2 INC.; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants, filed a notice to remove the lawsuit from the Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of King (Case No. 26-2-08520-0 SEA) to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on July 15, 2026. The Clerk of the Court for the Western District of Washington assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-04237. Learning Care Group (US) No. 2 Inc. provides educational services. The Company offers its services in the United States. [BN] The Defendants are represented by: E. Ashley Paynter, Esq. Emma A. Healey, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 5150 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 693-7057 Facsimile: (206) 693-7058 Email: ashley.paynter@ogletree.com emma.healey@ogletree.com LITTLE SLEEPIES: Vanderpoel Sues Over Disclosed Website Users' Data ------------------------------------------------------------------- CAROLINA VANDERPOEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. LITTLE SLEEPIES, INC., Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-04008-AJB-MSB (S.D. Cal., July 12, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act, common law invasion of privacy, and intrusion upon seclusion. The case arises from the Defendant's practice of intercepting, recording, decoding, capturing, disclosing, and using the contents of the Plaintiff's and Class members' electronic communications from its website to Meta Platforms, Inc. According to the complaint, the Defendant installed tracking technologies on its website which allows Meta to access users' electronic communications without consent. As a result of the Defendant's conduct, the Plaintiff and Class members have suffered injury, including the violation of their statutorily protected privacy interests, the loss of the right to control the dissemination and use of the contents of their communications, and the loss of the value of their private information. Little Sleepies, Inc. is a provider of housing and real estate services, with its principal place of business in California. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. Noah J. Larsh, Esq. SWIGART LAW GROUP, APC 2221 Camino del Rio S., Ste. 308 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (866) 219-3343 Email: Josh@SwigartLawGroup.com Noah@SwigartLawGroup.com - and - Daniel G. Shay, Esq. SHAY LEGAL, APC 2221 Camino del Rio S., Ste. 308 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (619) 222-7429 Email: Dan@ShayLegal.com LOS ANGELES, CA: Appeals Attorneys' Fees Order in Griffin Suit -------------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF LOS ANGELES is taking an appeal from a court order granting in part the Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees in the lawsuit entitled Judy Griffin, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. City of Los Angeles, Defendant, Case No. 2:24-cv-06312-RGK-MAR, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The suit is brought against the Defendant for alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. On Jan. 26, 2026, the Plaintiffs filed a motion for attorney fees, which Judge R. Gary Klausner granted in part on June 11, 2026. The Court grants in part the motion for attorneys' fees and awards $9,167,677 in attorneys' fees and $1,170,030.87 in costs to the Plaintiffs. The motion is otherwise denied. The appellate case is styled as Griffin, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, Case No. 26-4448, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed on July 13, 2026. The briefing schedule in the Appellate Case states that: -- Appellant's Mediation Questionnaire was due on July 20, 2026; -- Appellant's Appeal Transcript Order is due on July 24, 2026; -- Appellant's Appeal Transcript is due on August 24, 2026; -- Appellant's Opening Brief is due on October 2, 2026; and -- Appellee's Answering Brief is due on November 2, 2026. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellees JUDY GRIFFIN, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, are represented by: Andrew P. Lee, Esq. Ginger Grimes, Esq. Linda M. Dardarian, Esq. DARDARIAN HO KAN & LEE 155 Grand Avenue, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 - and - Scott Lewis Gordon, Esq. Jennifer Bybee, Esq. Mark T. Johnson, Esq. SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KIM, LLP 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1400 Emeryville, CA 94608 - and - Paula Pearlman, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF PAULA PEARLMAN 9610 Beverlywood Street Los Angeles, CA 90034 Defendant-Appellant CITY OF LOS ANGELES is represented by: Michael Martin Walsh, Esq. Gabriel Dermer, Esq. LOS ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 200 N. Main Street, 14th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 LOVESHACKFANCY LLC: Court Narrows Claims in "Harris" ---------------------------------------------------- In the case captioned as Chanel Harris, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. LoveShackFancy, LLC, Defendant, Civil Action No. 25 Civ. 5828 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y.), Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted in part and denied in part the Defendant's motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, in an Opinion and Order dated July 20, 2026. This is a putative class action. No class had been certified at the time of this ruling. The First Amended Complaint defined a proposed nationwide class of all persons charged a Shipping Protection Fee by the Defendant, along with a California subclass, and asserted claims on behalf of the Plaintiff individually and the proposed classes. The Plaintiff alleged that the Defendant, an e-commerce retailer of women's clothing, added a Shipping Protection Fee to customers' online shopping carts through a pre-checked box, without affirmative consent, provided by third-party insurer Route. The First Amended Complaint asserted five causes of action: (i) violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL); (ii) violation of California's False Advertising Law (FAL); (iii) violation of California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA); (iv) breach of contract; and (v) unjust enrichment. The court first addressed the Defendant's request for judicial notice, granting it as to a Senate Committee Report on the legislation that became the Restore Online Shoppers Confidence Act (ROSCA), but denying it as to two Route webpages because the Plaintiff disputed their authenticity and whether they were active at the time of her purchase. Turning to the UCL, FAL, and CLRA claims, the court found the Plaintiff plausibly alleged that a reasonable consumer could be deceived by the Defendant's practices on three grounds. First, the automatic addition of the fee at checkout, through a small pre-checked box appearing after the customer had finished shopping, could mislead a reasonable consumer into believing the charge was mandatory. The court noted the fee's placement during the shipping-information stage compounded this risk, and that the accompanying disclosure symbol was too small to meaningfully inform consumers. Second, the court found the Defendant's advertised free or flat-rate shipping representations could plausibly mislead consumers into believing shipping protection was already included. Third, the court held the fee's name and description were plausibly deceptive because it duplicated protections many consumers already had through carriers or credit card issuers, while the Defendant retained roughly half of each fee as profit. The court also held the Plaintiff adequately alleged that the fee's automatic addition constituted a negative option feature under ROSCA, serving as a predicate for UCL liability, rejecting the Defendant's argument that ROSCA applies only to recurring subscription charges. The court reasoned that the statutory text is not limited to recurring charges and that the Defendant failed to satisfy ROSCA's disclosure and consent requirements. However, the court dismissed the Plaintiff's theory under the CLRA's Honest Pricing Law, Section 1770(a)(29), finding that the fee was optional rather than mandatory on the face of the pleading, and that the provision reaches only mandatory charges. The court further held the Plaintiff adequately pleaded reliance on the Defendant's shipping representations, rejecting the Defendant's argument that the checkbox's presence defeated reliance as a matter of law. On the common law claims, the court dismissed the breach of contract claim under both California and New York law, finding no contract existed until the Plaintiff completed checkout with the fee disclosed in her cart, meaning the fee could not have breached a contract formed simultaneously with her assent. The court also dismissed the unjust enrichment claim because an undisputed express contract governed the transaction under both states' laws, precluding a quasi-contract theory even pled in the alternative. The court rejected the Defendant's argument that the voluntary payment doctrine barred all claims, finding the doctrine an affirmative defense inapplicable at the pleading stage where the Plaintiff alleged she lacked full knowledge that the fee existed or was optional. Finally, the court denied leave to amend the dismissed claims, concluding that amendment would be futile given the substantive nature of the pleading defects. The parties were directed to submit a joint case management plan by August 3, 2026. A copy of the Court's decision is available at https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/3IBW2EI/Harris_v_LoveShackFancy_LLC__nysdce-25-05828__0044.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA from PacerMonitor.com MATTERPORT LLC: Vanderpoel Sues Over Disclosure of Electronic Data ------------------------------------------------------------------ JEFFREY VANDERPOEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MATTERPORT, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-04010-BJC-MMP (S.D. Cal., July 12, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act, common law invasion of privacy, and intrusion upon seclusion. The case arises from the Defendant's practice of intercepting, recording, decoding, capturing, disclosing, and using the contents of the Plaintiff's and Class members' electronic communications from its website to Meta Platforms, Inc. According to the complaint, the Defendant installed tracking technologies on its website which allows Meta to access users' electronic communications without consent. As a result of the Defendant's conduct, the Plaintiff and Class members have suffered injury, including the violation of their statutorily protected privacy interests, the loss of the right to control the dissemination and use of the contents of their communications, and the loss of the value of their private information. Matterport, LLC is a housing and real estate services provider, with its principal place of business in California. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. Noah J. Larsh, Esq. SWIGART LAW GROUP, APC 2221 Camino del Rio S., Ste. 308 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (866) 219-3343 Email: Josh@SwigartLawGroup.com Noah@SwigartLawGroup.com - and - Daniel G. Shay, Esq. SHAY LEGAL, APC 2221 Camino del Rio S., Ste. 308 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (619) 222-7429 Email: Dan@ShayLegal.com MEDLINE INDUSTRIES: Mismanages Retirement Plan, Fredbeck Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------------- JON C. FREDBECK; and COLT R. NELMS, individually, and as Representatives of a Class of Participants and Beneficiaries of the Medline Industries, LP Retirement Plan, Plaintiffs v. MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, LP; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, LP; MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, LP QUALIFIED PLANS COMMITTEE; AND MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, LP QUALIFIED PLANS COMMITTEE PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-08375 (N.D., IL., July 15, 2026) Employee Retirement Income Security Act. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, as of December 31, 2024, Plan participants had invested over $1.6 billion in the 401(k) Plan. Approximately $97 million in the 401(k) Plan—or about 6%—was invested in the TRP Growth Stock strategy. As described in Section VIII, by failing to remove the TRP Growth Stock investment option, Defendants caused participants to lose tens of millions of dollars in retirement savings since the start of the Class Period. As fiduciaries of the Plan, the Defendants are duty-bound to monitor the Plan's investments and protect participants from imprudent investment options by removing them from the Plan's lineup within a reasonable time. Yet Defendants repeatedly refused to remove the TRP Growth Stock investment option despite many years of poor performance. A prudent fiduciary would have removed the Strategy well before, but not later than the start of the Class Period, and certainly during the ensuing years of poor performance throughout the Class Period. Defendants' conduct has been imprudent, alleges the suit. Medline Industries LP of the United States manufactures and distributes health care products. The Company supplies wound and skin care products, gloves, face masks, isolation gowns, monitors, reusable textiles, durable medical equipment, and electrosurgical products. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Paul M. Secunda WALCHESKE & LUZI, LLC 125 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (414) 828-2372 Email: psecunda@walcheskeluzi.com MEJURI (US) INC: Tejon Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Mejuri (US), Inc. The case is styled as Roger Tejon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Mejuri (US), Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-24744-XXXX (S.D. Fla., July 10, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Mejuri -- https://mejuri.com/ -- is the new luxury of online jewelry shops.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Christopher Eric Berman, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE 1650 SE 17th Street 100 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 Phone: (865) 603-7365 Email: cberman@shamisgentile.com MERCADIEN PC: Faces Williams Suit Over Clients' Compromised Info ---------------------------------------------------------------- GEORGE WILLIAMS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MERCADIEN PC, CPAS, and IRCO COMMUNITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendants, Case No. 3:26-cv-08502 (D.N.J., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for negligence, negligence per se, unjust enrichment, breach of third-party beneficiary contract, breach of implied contract, and violations of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law. The case arises from the Defendants' failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals stored within Mercadien's network systems following a data breach detected on or around November 7, 2025. The Defendants also failed to timely notify the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals about the data breach. As a result, the private information of the Plaintiff and Class members was compromised and damaged through access by and disclosure to unknown and unauthorized third parties. Mercadien PC, CPAs is a professional financial services corporation, headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey. IRCO Community Federal Credit Union is a financial services company, headquartered in Philipsburg, New Jersey. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kenneth J. Grunfeld, Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW PA 65 Overhill Road Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 Telephone: (954) 525-4100 Email: grunfeld@kolawyers.com - and - Jeff Ostrow, Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW PA One W. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 332-4200 Email: ostrow@kolaywers.com MERIDIAN CARE INC: Chilaka Sues Over to Recover Unpaid Wages ------------------------------------------------------------ Iheanyichukwu Chilaka, Individually and for Others Similarly Situated v. MERIDIAN CARE, INC., Case No. 4:26-cv-05521 (S.D. Tex., July 13, 2026), is brought against the Defendant to recover unpaid overtime wages and other damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). The Plaintiff and the other Straight Time Workers regularly worked more than 40 hours a week. But the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff and its other Straight Time Workers premium overtime wages. Instead the Defendant misclassified the Plaintiff and its other Straight Time Workers as independent contractors and paid them the same hourly rate for all hours worked, including those worked over 40 in a workweek (a practice known as "straight time for overtime"). The Defendant applied its illegal straight time for overtime pay scheme to the Plaintiff and its other Straight Time Workers regardless of any individualized factors. The Defendant's uniform straight time for overtime pay scheme violates the FLSA by depriving the Plaintiff and the other Straight Time Workers of the "time and a half" overtime premium they are owed for hours worked after 40 in a workweek. In addition to failing to pay the Plaintiff premium overtime wages, the Defendant also terminated his employment for engaging in protected activity under the FLSA. Specifically, the Defendant fired the Plaintiff in retaliation for complaining about not receiving premium overtime wages in willful violation of the FLSA, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Meridian Care as a Direct Care Provider from November 2025 through April 2026. Meridian Care provides healthcare services to individuals across Texas.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Taylor A. Jones, Esq. HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP 1201 Fannin Street, Suite 202 Houston, TX 77002 Phone: (832) 446-9403 Fax: (832) 356-2684 Email: tjones@hkm.com META PLATFORMS: Bid to Modify Class Cert. Briefing Sched OK'd ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as NATALIE DELGADO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. META PLATFORMS, INC., Case No. 3:23-cv-04181-SI (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Illston entered an order granting the stipulation to modify class certification briefing schedule. The current class certification briefing and class certification expert disclosure deadlines are vacated. The Parties will submit a proposed schedule for same within 7 days of Court's order on motion for interlocutory appeal. On May 20, 2026, the Court entered its Order denying Meta's motion for summary judgment. On June 16, 2026, Meta filed a motion seeking certification of the summary judgment order for interlocutory appeal. Meta is a provider of social networking, advertising, and business insight solutions. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=f9MiCc at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mike Arias, Esq. Elise R. Sanguinetti, Esq. Arnold C. Wang, Esq. M. Anthony Jenkins, Esq. Craig S. Momita, Esq. ARIAS SANGUINETTI WANG & TEAM LLP 6701 Center Drive West, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Telephone: (310) 844-9696 Facsimile: (310) 861-0168 E-mail: mike@aswtlawyers.com elise@aswtlawyers.com arnold@aswtlawyers.com craig@aswtlawyers.com anthony@aswtlawyers.com - and - Thomas P. Rosenfeld, Esq. Kevin P. Green, Esq. Thomas C. Horscroft, Esq. Daniel S. Levy, Esq. GOLDENBERG HELLER & ANTOGNOLI, P.C. 2227 South State Route 157 Edwardsville, IL 62025 Telephone: (618) 656-5150 E-mail: tom@ghalaw.com kevin@ghalaw.com thorscroft@ghalaw.com daniel@ghalaw.com The Defendant is represented by: Lauren R. Goldman, Esq. Michael Brandon, Esq. Christopher Chorba, Esq. Diana Feinstein, Esq. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 Telephone: (212) 351-4000 Facsimile: (212) 351-4035 E-mail: lgoldman@gibsondunn.com mbrandon@gibsondunn.com cchorba@gibsondunn.com dfeinstein@gibsondunn.com - and - Gary S. Feinerman, Esq. Kathryn K. George, Esq. Robert C. Collins III, Esq. Sean Berkowitz, Esq. LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 330 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 2800 Chicago, IL 60611 Telephone: (312) 876-7700 E-mail: gary.feinerman@lw.com katie.george@lw.com robert.collins@lw.com sean.berkowitz@lw.com MH SUB I LLC: Delic Files TCPA Suit in N.D. Illinois ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against MH Sub I, LLC. The case is styled as Marko Delic, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. MH Sub I, LLC doing business as: Auto Credit Express, Case No. 1:26-cv-08164 (N.D. Ill., July 10, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. MH Sub I, LLC doing business as Auto Credit Express -- https://www.autocreditexpress.com/ -- is the nation's leading special finance leads car dealer services corporation.[BN] The Plaintiff appears pro se. MICROSOFT CORP: Seeks to Seal Class Cert Opposition Documents ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00718-RSM (W.D. Wash.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order granting their motion to seal documents related to opposition to motion for class certification to allow the Plaintiff and Kaiser an opportunity to respond to this motion. The Court should also seal the unredacted copies of (1) the Opposition; (2) the declaration of Joshua Storz in support of Microsoft's opposition to motion for class certification; and (3) Exhibit H, with redactions applied in the publicly filed versions of these documents to redact substantive discussions of Exhibits A and B (while the Court evaluates Plaintiff and Kaiser's forthcoming response to support their sealing requests) and of documents currently under seal on the docket. To preserve the confidentiality of these materials, Microsoft asks the Court to permit provisional sealing of the unredacted copy of the Storz Declaration and Exhibit H until after the Plaintiff and Kaiser have an opportunity to support their sealing requests and the Court determines whether these materials should remain under seal. Microsoft is an American multinational corporation and technology company. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=O8DhcQ at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Fred B. Burnside, Esq. Xiang Li, Esq. Caleah Whitten, Esq. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 Telephone: (206) 622-3150 E-mail: fredburnside@dwt.com xiangli@dwt.com caleahwhitten@dwt.com MIKE'S BEER: Class Cert Bid Filing in McFeaters Suit Due Dec. 11 ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as SHINICE MCFEATERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED; v. MIKE'S BEER BAR, LLC, MICHAEL C SUKITCH, Case No. 2:26-cv-00696-MJH (W.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge Horan entered an initial case management order as follows: -- Disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) shall be made on or before Aug. 3, 2026. -- Additional parties shall be joined on or before Sept. 4, 2026, for persons other than additional party plaintiffs that may opt-in to this case under the FLSA. -- Pleadings shall be amended on or before Sept. 4, 2026, for persons other than additional party plaintiffs that may opt-in to this case under the FLSA. -- Conditional collective and class certification fact discovery shall be completed on or before Nov. 13, 2026. -- The Plaintiff's motion for class certification/Plaintiff's motion for conditional certification, memorandum in support, and all supporting evidence shall be filed on or before Dec. 11, 2026. -- The Defendant's memorandum in opposition to class certification/conditional certification and all supporting evidence shall be filed on or before Jan. 8, 2027. Mike's Beer is a craft beer destination and sports bar. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=jvX5Z3 at no extra charge.[CC] MOLINA HEALTHCARE: Class Certification Filing in Rhebb Due Nov. 20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Rick Rhebb v. Molina Healthcare, Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-01488-HDV-PD (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Vera entered an order setting pretrial and trial schedule as follows: Jury trial: Aug. 31, 2027 Final pretrial conference: Aug. 10, 2027 Hearing on motions in Limine: Aug. 3, 2027 Last date to hear motion to amend Aug. 13, 2026 pleadings/add Parties: Expert discovery cut-off: Apr. 13, 2027 The Court also sets the following schedule for briefing and hearing on the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification: The Plaintiff's motion for class certification: Nov 20, 2026 The Defendant's opposition brief: Dec. 18, 2026 The Plaintiff's reply brief: Jan. 4, 2027 Hearing: Jan. 28, 2027 If the parties have not yet exchanged initial disclosures, the Court orders that the mutual exchange required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 occur no later than Aug. 8, 2026. The Defendant is an American managed care company. A copy of the Court's order dated July 9, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=KzmbX5 at no extra charge.[CC] MOTT'S LLP: Extension of Class Certification Deadlines Sought ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as MEL RICH and JESSE LOPEZ, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, v. MOTT'S LLP, a Delaware Limited Liability Partnership, Case No. 1:25-cv-00243-GBW (D. Del.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order granting their stipulation to extend class certification and fact discovery deadlines. Given the Court's ruling, the parties require time to discuss the implications of the order on discovery, expert reports, and other pretrial scheduling, and would like to modify the schedule to ensure adequate time to complete discovery, prepare expert reports, and brief class certification. Modifying the deadlines to substantially complete document production, extend fact discovery, and move for class certification will not alter any other dates currently set, as all other dates are keyed off a ruling on class certification. Therefore, subject to the approval of the Court, the Parties stipulate that the deadline to substantially complete document production be set for Nov. 16, 2026. The Plaintiffs' deadline to file for class certification shall be moved to Jan. 8, 2027, the Defendant's opposition to the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification shall be filed on March 8, 2027, and the Plaintiffs' reply in support of the motion for class certification shall be filed on May 9, 2027. The Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action on March 3, 2025. The Defendant is a producer of healthy applesauce and fruit juices. A copy of the Parties' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=bD1D0g at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: R. Grant Dick IV, Esq. Kevin D. Levitsky, Esq. COOCH AND TAYLOR P.A. 1000 N. West Street, Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: 302-984-3800 E-mail: gdick@coochtaylor.com klevitsky@coochtaylor.com - and - Yeremey O. Krivoshey, Esq. Joel D. Smith, Esq. SMITH KRIVOSHEY, PC 166 Geary Str STE 1500-1507 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 839-7077 Facsimile: (888) 410-0415 E-mail: yeremey@skclassactions.com joel@skclassactions.com The Defendant is represented by: Jennifer C. Wasson, Esq. Tyler E. Cragg, Esq. POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 984-6000 E-mail: jwasson@potteranderson.com tcragg@potteranderson.com - and - Charles C. Sipos, Esq. Jasmine W. Wetherell, Esq. PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: (206) 359-8000 E-mail: CSipos@perkinscoie.com JWetherell@perkinscoie.com MV TRANSPORTATION: Removes Jackson Suit to C.D. Cal. ---------------------------------------------------- The Defendant in the case of DEREK JACKSON; and AMANDA GARCIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.; MV PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, INC.; WESTCATS; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants, filed a notice to remove the lawsuit from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles (Case No. 26STCV18577) to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on July 17, 2026. The Clerk of Court for the Central District of California assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-07842 to the proceeding. MV Transportation Inc provides transportation services to cities, counties, municipalities, and other jurisdictional entities, as well as for private corporations, non-profit agencies, and community organizations. [BN] The Defendants are represented by: Gregory G. Iskander, Esq. Michael W. Nelson, Esq. Ronak Patel, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Treat Towers 1255 Treat Boulevard, Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Telephone: (925) 932-2468 Facsimile: (925) 946-9809 Email: giskander@littler.com mwnelson@littler.com ropatel@littler.com MYCAJITA CORP: Espinal Sues Over Blind's Equal Access to Website ---------------------------------------------------------------- FRANGIE ESPINAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MYCAJITA CORPORATION, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-05935 (S.D.N.Y., July 14, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York City Human Rights Law, and the New York General Business Law. According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its websites to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually impaired persons. The Defendant's website, https://www.mycajita.com/ contains access barriers which hinder the Plaintiff and Class members to enjoy the benefits of their online goods, content, and services offered to the public through the website. The accessibility issues on the website include but not limited to: lack of alternative text (alt-text), empty links that contain no text, redundant links, and linked images missing alt-text. The Plaintiff and Class members seek permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that its website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals. Mycajita Corporation is a company that sells online goods and services in New York. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Telephone: (212) 228-9795 Facsimile: (212) 982-6284 Email: Jeffrey@Gottlieb.legal Dana@Gottlieb.legal Michael@Gottlieb.legal MYRTLE BEACH, SC: Class Cert Bid Filing in Daniel Due August 19 --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Daniel v. Myrtle Beach SC, City of et al., Case No. 4:25-cv-01231 (D.S.C., Filed Feb. 27, 2025), the Hon. Judge Sheria Akins Clarke entered an order extending the Class Certification deadlines set forth in Consent Amended Scheduling Order by 30 days. The Plaintiff shall file his motion to certify a class pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 on or before August 19, 2026. The Defendant shall file its opposition to the class certification motion on or before September 21, 2026, and Plaintiff shall file any reply on or before October 5, 2026. The nature of suit states torts - personal injury - other personal injury. City of Myrtle Beach is a residential and vacation community at the heart of South Carolina's Grand Strand coast.[CC] NASSAU COUNTY, NY: Myers's Bid for Class Certification Tossed ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JHISAIAH MYERS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Case No. 2:22-cv-07023-SJB-LGD (E.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Bulsara entered an order: -- denying Myers's motion for class certification, and -- granting in part and denying in part the parties' motion to seal. The parties are directed to file a renewed sealing application with narrowly tailored redactions as to Myers's application materials that were filed entirely under seal, and do so by July 17, 2026. Myers has not met his burden to show a pattern or practice of discriminatory treatment by a preponderance of the evidence, the Court says. Accordingly, the motion to seal is granted as to the parties' proposed redactions. However, the parties are directed to confer and file a public version of Myers's application materials with tailored redactions and a renewed application to seal any portions of that document sought to be maintained under seal, beyond the PII the Court has already deemed permissible to redact. Myers's motion seeks certification of two different classes, more narrowly defined than those in his Complaint. The first, which seeks injunctive relief in the form of changes to the County's practices, consists of: "Black and Hispanic applicants for police officer positions in Nassau County disqualified during the background investigation phase . . . of the 2018 and subsequent hiring cycles." The second, which seeks back pay, damages, and an order restoring class members' eligibility, consists of: "Black and Hispanic applicants for police officer positions in Nassau County disqualified during the Background Investigation of the 2018 hiring cycle." Nassau is a suburban county located on Long Island, immediately to the east of New York City. A copy of the Court's memorandum and order dated July 9, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=D7SpTK at no extra charge.[CC] NEW DIRECTION: Class Certification Bid Filing Set for Sept. 28 -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOSEPH THERIAULT and WILLIAM WEIGEL, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, v. NEW DIRECTION IRA, INC., NEW DIRECTION TRUST COMPANY, and MAINSTAR TRUST, Case No. 2:23-cv-02477-JWB-ADM (D. Kan.), the Hon. Judge entered an order granting the parties’ joint motion to amend scheduling Order as follows: Event Deadline/Setting Fact depositions completed: Sept. 8, 2026 The Plaintiffs' motion for class Sept. 28, 2026 certification and class certification expert disclosures: The Defendants' response to motion Nov. 16, 2026 for class certification and class-certification expert disclosures: The Plaintiffs' expert disclosures Nov. 16, 2026 (merits): Completion of all discovery, including Feb. 1, 2027 third-party witness depositions: Proposed pretrial order due: Feb. 17, 2027 New Direction is a provider of Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs) and Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=2RsLzu at no extra charge.[CC] NEW DIRECTION: Parties Seek to Amend Scheduling Order ----------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Joseph Gilbert Theriault and William Weigel, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, v. New Direction IRA, Inc., New Direction Trust Company, and Mainstar Trust, Case No. 2:23-cv-02477-JWB-ADM (D. Kan.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an amended scheduling order, extending the deadlines contained in the Court's Amended Scheduling Order by one month and accounting for the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. Pursuant to the Court's Amended Scheduling Order, the New Direction Defendants have been making rolling productions of documents responsive to Plaintiffs' Third Requests for Production, and these rolling productions will be completed no later than July 31, 2026. The parties believe that taking the former New Direction employee depositions after completion of the rolling productions will promote a more efficient discovery process and avoid the possibility of having to reopen or supplement those depositions based upon documents produced later in the rolling production. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the Court set Feb. 1, 2027—the proposed deadline for completion of all Discovery -- as the deadline for completing those third-party depositions. New Direction is a provider of Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs) and Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). A copy of the Parties' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=nIvvOA at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Scott C. Nehrbass, Esq. FOULSTON SIEFKIN LLP 7500 College Boulevard, Suite 1400 Overland Park, KS 66210 Telephone: (913) 498-2144 Facsimile: (913) 498-2101 E-mail: snehrbass@foulston.com - and - Roger N. Walter, Esq. MORRIS LAING LAW FIRM 800 SW Jackson, Suite 1310 Topeka, KS 66612 TelePhone: (785) 232-2662 E-mail: rwalter@morrislaing.com - and - Daniel Pulgram, Esq. Willem F. Jonckheer, Esq. SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE 2001 Union St., Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94123 Telephone: (415) 788-4220 E-mail: wjonckheer@sjk.law The Defendants are represented by: M. Todd Carroll, Esq. Kevin A. Hall, Esq. WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON US LLP 1221 Main Street, Suite 1600 Columbia, SC 29201 Telephone: (803) 454-6504 E-mail: todd.carroll@wbd-us.com kevin.hall@wbd-us.com - and - Stephen R. McAllister, Esq. Harrison M. Rosenthal, Esq. DENTONS US LLP 4520 Main Street, Suite 1100 Kansas City, MO 64111-7700 Telephone: (816) 460-2400 Facsimile: (816) 531-7545 E-mail: stephen.mcallister@dentons.com harrison.rosenthal@dentons.com - and - Richard N. Bien, Esq. Brian C. Fries, Esq. Carrie E. Josserand, Esq. LATHROP GPM, LLP – KANSAS CITY 2345 Grand Blvd, Suite 2200 Kansas City, MO 64108-2618 Telephone: (816) 292-2000 E-mail: Richard.bien@lathropgpm.com Brian.fries@lathropgpm.com Carrie.josserand@lathropgpm.com NEWFRONT INSURANCE: Sued Over Employee Shareholders Discrimination ------------------------------------------------------------------ SCOTT GAULT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. EUGENE LIPKIN, GORDON WINTROB, BRIAN HETHERINGTON, KURT DE GROSZ, COURTNEY LEIMKUHLER, KATHERINE AUGUST-DEWILDE, BRIAN SINGERMAN, KEVIN HARTZ, MAX MOTSCHWILLER, PIP LIPKIN, JIM BUIE, MARY BUIE, JENNIFER CANAVAN, JONATHAN YOUNG, NEWFRONT INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. and WILLIS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendants, Case No. 2026-0803-BWD (Del. Ch., June 23, 2026) is a class action lawsuit over unfair treatment of employee securityholders after Newfront's merger with Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company, a global advisory, insurance brokerage and solutions company in January 2026. According to the complaint, employee securityholders received an unfair price for their Newfront securities under the Merger Agreement and were coerced into accepting the restrictive covenants and release of claims against the Defendants. Employee securityholders did not receive the substantial equivalent of their shares they held prior to the merger, says the suit. Plaintiff Gault was an employee of Newfront and a holder of Newfront common stock as of the date of the Merger Agreement. Newfront Insurance is a private insurance broker specialized in using advanced technology with principal executive offices in San Francisco, California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Nathan E. Denning, Esq. Andrew Ritter, Esq. Lindsay J. Timlin, Esq. WIGGIN AND DANA LLP 437 Madison Avenue, 35th Floor New York, NY 10022 - and - William J. Fields, Esq. Christopher J. Kupka, Esq. Samir Shukurov, Esq. FIELDS KUPKA & SHUKUROV LLP 141 Tompkins Ave, Suite 404 Pleasantville, NY 10570 Telephone: (212) 231-1500 - and - F. Troupe Mickler, Esq. ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A. 500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 654-1888 Email: tmickler@ashbygeddes.com NINKASI HOLDING: Midler Appeals Denied Remand Bid to 9th Circuit ---------------------------------------------------------------- LAURENCE MIDLER, et al. are taking an appeal from a court order denying their motion to remand in the lawsuit entitled Laurence Midler, as trustee of the Laurence and Shari Midler Trust, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Ninkasi Holding Company, Inc., et al., Defendants, Case No. 6:26-cv-00496-MC, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. The suit, which was removed from the County of Multnomah Circuit Court of the State of Oregon to the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, alleges that the Defendants improperly raised substantially more than $3 million in securities that were unregistered and/or were offered and sold through certain misrepresentations and omissions. On Apr. 10, 2026, the Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand the case to State Court, which Judge Michael J. McShane denied on June 29, 2026. Accordingly, the Court declines to award attorney fees and costs to any party. The appellate case is styled as Midler, et al. v. Ninkasi Holding Company, Inc., et al., Case No. 26-4396, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed on July 10, 2026. [BN] Plaintiffs-Petitioners LAURENCE MIDLER, as trustee of the Laurence and Shari Midler Trust, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, are represented by: Cody B. Hoesly, Esq. BARG SINGER HOESLY, PC 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97205 - and - Michael Clark Willes, Esq. WILLES LAW, PC 1120 SE Madison Street Portland, OR 97214 Defendants-Respondents NINKASI HOLDING COMPANY, INC., et al. are represented by: William Greg Lockwood, Esq. GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 1300 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97201 - and - Ian M. Christy, Esq. MILLER NASH, LLP 1140 SW Washington Street, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205 - and - Blake H. Fry, Esq. Matthew J. Kalmanson, Esq. HART WAGNER, LLP 1000 SW Broadway, 20th Floor Portland, OR 97205 - and - Brad Spencer Daniels, Esq. Jacob Cholst Goldberg, Esq. STOEL RIVES, LLP 760 SW 9th Avenue, Suite 3000 Portland, OR 97205 NORTH LOS ANGELES: Faces G.M. Suit Over Data Breach --------------------------------------------------- G.M., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, FABIOLA CAMARGO, individually and on behalf all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. NORTH LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER, INC., and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV21845 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., July 10, 2026) is an action against the Defendants seeking damages, restitution, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and all other available remedies due to the occurrence of a data breach. As part of providing services, NLACRC collected and maintained highly sensitive personal and health information belonging to Plaintiff and thousands of other current and former clients. The information included, among other things, names, Social Security numbers, financial information, medical information, health-insurance information, and other protected personal and health data. In June of 2026, NLACRC began notifying affected individuals that cybercriminals had accessed and stolen data from its systems during a November 2024 ransomware attack. According to NLACRC, the attackers exfiltrated information from its network before encrypting or encoding certain computer systems to render them inaccessible. The Plaintiff alleges that the data breach was the foreseeable result of NLACRC's failure to implement and maintain reasonable cybersecurity safeguards sufficient to protect the sensitive information entrusted to it. As a result of the data breach, the Plaintiff and Class Members have suffered actual injuries and face an ongoing risk of identity theft, fraud, misuse of their private information, invasion of privacy, and other damages, asserts the complaint. North Los Angeles County Regional Center, Inc. is a nonprofit regional center that provides services to individuals with developmental disabilities throughout Los Angeles County in California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: M. Anderson Berry, Esq. Gregory Haroutunian, Esq. Brandon P. Jack, Esq. EMERY | REDDY, PC 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (916) 823-6955 Facsimile: (206) 441-9711 E-mail: anderson@emeryreddy.com gregory@emeryreddy.com brandon@emeryreddy.com - and - Kevin Laukaitis, Esq. LAUKAITIS LAW LLC 954 Avenida Ponce De Leon Suite 205, #10518 San Juan, PR 00907 Telephone: (215) 789-4462 E-mail: klaukaitis@laukaitislaw.com NORTH LOS ANGELES: Fails to Protect Personal Info, Suit Says ------------------------------------------------------------ A.T., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, HEIDI WOLLERMAN, individually and on behalf all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. NORTH LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER, INC., and DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE., Defendants, Case No. 26STCV21835 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., July 10, 2026) is an action against the Defendants seeking damages, restitution, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and all other available remedies due to the occurrence of a data breach. As part of providing services, NLACRC collected and maintained highly sensitive personal and health information belonging to Plaintiff and thousands of other current and former clients. The information included, among other things, names, Social Security numbers, financial information, medical information, health-insurance information, and other protected personal and health data. In June of 2026, NLACRC began notifying affected individuals that cybercriminals had accessed and stolen data from its systems during a November 2024 ransomware attack. According to NLACRC, the attackers exfiltrated information from its network before encrypting or encoding certain computer systems to render them inaccessible. The Plaintiff alleges that the data breach was the foreseeable result of NLACRC's failure to implement and maintain reasonable cybersecurity safeguards sufficient to protect the sensitive information entrusted to it. As a result of the data breach, the Plaintiff and Class Members have suffered actual injuries and face an ongoing risk of identity theft, fraud, misuse of their private information, invasion of privacy, and other damages. North Los Angeles County Regional Center, Inc. is a nonprofit regional center that provides services to individuals with developmental disabilities throughout Los Angeles County in California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: M. Anderson Berry, Esq. Gregory Haroutunian, Esq. Brandon P. Jack, Esq. EMERY | REDDY, PC 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (916) 823-6955 Facsimile: (206) 441-9711 E-mail: anderson@emeryreddy.com gregory@emeryreddy.com brandon@emeryreddy.com NUTRIEN LTD: Faces Harden Over NPK Fertilizers' Monopoly -------------------------------------------------------- CHARLES C. HARDEN d/b/a CLOVERGRASS PRODUCE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. NUTRIEN LTD.; NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS; THE MOSAIC CO.; MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC; MOSAIC CANADA CROP NUTRITION, LP; CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC.; CF INDUSTRIES, INC.; CF INDUSTRIES NITROGEN, LLC; KOCH INDUSTRIES, LLC; KOCH AG & ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC; KOCH FERTILIZER WEVER, LLC; KOCH AGRONOMIC SERVICES, LLC; KOCH FERTILIZER, LLC; YARA INTERNATIONAL ASA; YARA NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CANPOTEX LTD.; INTERNATIONAL FERTILIZER ASSOCIATION; AND THE FERTILIZER INSTITUTE, Defendants, Case No. 6:26-cv-01220 (D. Kansas, July 15, 2026) alleges violation of the Sherman Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendants engaged in unlawful agreement to fix and raise the price of fertilizer containing one or more of the ingredients nitrogen, phosphate, and/or potassium (potash) (collectively, "NPK Fertilizer") in the United States from January 1, 2020 to the present. The Defendants colluded to artificially fix and raise prices of NPK Fertilizer in the United States, causing the price of NPK Fertilizer in the United States to rise to supracompetitive levels. Defendants' actions resulted in Plaintiff and members of the Class paying supracompetitive prices for NPK Fertilizer in the United States and its territories, the suit says. Nutrien Ltd. provides crop inputs and services. The Company produces and distributes potash, nitrogen, and phosphate products for agricultural, industrial, and feed customers. Nutrien serves the agriculture industry worldwide. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Eric D. Barton, Esq. Tyler W. Hudson, Esq. WAGSTAFF & CARTMELL, LLP 4740 Grand Ave. Ste. 300 Kansas City, MO 64112 Telephone: (816) 701-1100 Email: thudson@wcllp.com ebarton@wcllp.com - and - John Radice, Esq. Daniel Rubenstein, Esq. Kenneth Walsh, Esq. RADICE LAW FIRM, P.C. 475 Wall Street Princeton, NJ 08540 Tel: (646) 245-8502 Fax: (609) 385-0745 Email: jradice@radicelawfirm.com drubenstein@radicelawfirm.com kwalsh@radicelawfirm.com OXFORD FINANCIAL: Faces Bird TCPA Suit in D. Ariz. -------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Oxford Financial Publishing LLC. The case is captioned as Daniel Bird individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated employees v. Oxford Financial Publishing LLC, Case No. 2:26-cv-04323-MTL (D. Ariz., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit is related to the restrictions of the use of telephone equipment under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Oxford Financial, LLC was founded in 2007. The company's line of business includes the retail sale of used cars.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Andrew Roman Perrong, Esq. PERRONG LAW LLC 1669 Edgewood Rd., Ste. 218 Yardley, PA 19067 Telephone: (215) 225-5529 Facsimile: (888) 329-0305 Email: a@perronglaw.com PACCAR INC: Bid for Class Certification in 10th Gear Due Oct. 13 ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as 10th GEAR LLC, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. PACCAR, INC., Case No. 2:23-cv-01933-RSL (W.D. Wash.), the Hon. Judge Lasnik entered an amended order setting trial date & related dates: Trial date: July 12, 2027 Motion for class certification due by: Oct. 13, 2026 Opposition to class certification Nov. 15, 2026 motion due by: Discovery completed by: March 15, 2027 Settlement conference held no later March 29, 2027 than: All motions in limine must be filed by June 14, 2027 and noted on the motion calendar for fourteen days after filing: Trial briefs, proposed voir dire July 7, 2027 questions, proposed jury instructions, and trial exhibits due: PACCAR is a manufacturer of heavy, medium, and light-duty commercial trucks. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=EdFR8z at no extra charge.[CC] PASCO PROCESSING: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Gallegos Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------- MANUEL GALLEGOS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PASCO PROCESSING, LLC; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 4:26-cv-05112-ACE (E.D. Wa., July 15, 2026) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Gallegos was employed by the Defendants as a forklift operator. Pasco Processing LLC operates in the agriculture industry. The Company specializes in the processing of potatoes and other vegetables. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jamie K. Serb, Esq. CROSNER LEGAL, P.C. 92 Lenora Street, #179 Seattle, WA 98121 Telephone: (866) 276-7637 Facsimile: (310) 510-6429 Email: jamie@crosnerlegal.com PEACEFUL CORNER: Hernandez Seeks Collective Conditional Status -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as HAYDEE SOFIA HERNANDEZ, GILDA OLIVEIRA, EMERALD HERNANDEZ, SARRA ROUSSOU and ALICE BASOVSKY, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, v. A PEACEFUL CORNER, INC., d/b/a EVOL NIGHTCLUB, and CHENG ("DANNY") LIN; Case No. 1:26-cv-01637-SHS (S.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court granting motion for conditional certification of an Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") collective. EVOL is an immersive, multi-level nightlife venue in SoHo. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=FBLp6q at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Michael DiGiulio, Esq. JOSEPH & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 45 Broadway, Suite 320 New York, NY 10006 Telephone: (212) 752-1611 PHH MORTGAGE: Consolidated Bid to Seal Documents OK'd ----------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ANNTWANETTE JONES and LUCINDA ALLARD, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION D/B/A PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES, Case No. 1:23-cv-01040-CPO-SAK (D.N.J.), the Hon. Judge O'Hearn entered an order granting the consolidated motion to seal. The Court further orders that the Clerk of the Court is directed to maintain under seal ECF Nos. 135-19, 135-21, 135-28, 136-21, 136-23 and 136-30; and that the remaining documents in docket entries 135 and 136 that are not identified in the preceding paragraph shall be unsealed and filed on the public docket. The Court finds, as PHH contends, that if the information in ECF Nos. 135-19, -21 and -28, and ECF Nos. 136-21, -23, and -30 were made publicly available, PHH's present and future business interests could be subject to injury. Similarly, given the fact that it seeks to seal only 3 of 47 exhibits, and in light of the narrow tailoring of its request and the sensitivity of the information sought to be protected, the Court agrees that the only way to protect PHH's legitimate commercial interests is to seal the subject materials. On Feb. 22, 2023, the Plaintiffs filed this action against PHH asserting claims relating to convenience fees charged by PHH. PHH provides mortgage financing solutions. A copy of the Court's opinion and order dated July 9, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=9tGIjN at no extra charge.[CC] PLUMBING LLC: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Mejia Suit Alleges ----------------------------------------------------------- CARLOS MEJIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WINDHAM PLUMBING, LLC; and RICHARD DEL CIELLO, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-04237 (E.D.N.Y., July 15, 2026) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Mejia was employed by the Defendants as a service mechanic and field technician. A Plumbing LLC was founded in 2000. The company's line of business includes providing plumbing, heating, air-conditioning, and similar work. [BN] The Defendants are represented by: Zachary Naidich, Esq. NAIDICH LAW 123 5th Ave., 5th Fl. New York, NY 10003 Telephone: (646) 661-5694 Email: ZNaidich@naidichlaw.com POWERHOME TECHNOLOGIES: Gotra's Bid to Vacate Class Cert. Tossed ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as BRENNAN LANDY, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, v. POWERHOME TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; and JASJIT GOTRA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00241-JJM-PAS (D.R.I.), the Hon. Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. entered an order: -– denying Mr. Gotra's motion to vacate class certification; and -- granting in part and denying in part Mr. Landy's renewed motion for approval of plan for disseminating notice to the class. Notice shall be made in accordance with Mr. Landy's motion, but he will bear the costs of notice. The record establishes that there are common questions that predominate, the class as defined shares common questions of law and fact, Mr. Landy's claims are typical, and a class action is superior to other methods of adjudication here. Therefore, Mr. Gotra's motion under Rule 23(c)(1)(C) is denied, the Court says. This is a class action alleging that Defendants violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by making unsolicited automated calls to the Plaintiff and others similarly situated. Mr. Landy filed a motion for class certification on May 7, 2025. Power Home is a privately held security and smart home automation company. A copy of the Court's order dated July 9, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=42CHEF at no extra charge.[CC] PRECISION HEATING: Class Certification Hearing Set for Sept. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Marvin Picon individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Precision Heating & Air Inc., Case No. 1:25-cv-05507-WMR (N.D. Ga.), the Hon. Judge William Ray II entered an order setting hearing on the motions to certify class for Wednesday, Sept. 2, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. The hearing will take place in Courtroom 1705 of the Richard B. Russell Federal Building located at 2211 United States Courthouse, 75 Ted Turner Drive, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303- 3309. Precision provides HVAC services. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=qo2pPY at no extra charge.[CC] PROJECT HEALTHY: Uses Trap & Trace on Website, Resnick Suit Claims ------------------------------------------------------------------ HENRY RESNICK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PROJECT HEALTHY LIVING, INC. dba ALOHA and ALOHA, INC., DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 2:26-cv-07640 (C.D. Cal., July 14, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for violation of the California Trap and Trace Law. The case arises from Aloha's use of trap and trace technology to identify users of its website without prior consent. According to the complaint, Aloha installed TikTok's trap and trace software on its website, because it is designed to capture the routing, addressing, and other signaling information of website visitors. As a result of Aloha's unlawful practice, the Plaintiff suffered injuries, including, without limitation, loss of control over his private personal information. Project Healthy Living, Inc., doing business as Aloha and Aloha, Inc., is a manufacturer, wholesale distributor, and reseller of organic and plant-based snacks based in Connecticut. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Peter K. Chu, Esq. Camrie Ventry, Esq. TAULER SMITH LLP 626 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 927-9270 Email: pchu@taulersmith.com cventry@taulersmith.com R&E MANAGEMENT: Faces Graham Suit Over Unlawful Rent Collection --------------------------------------------------------------- SUZANNE GRAHAM, an individual, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. R&E MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.; and DOES 1 through 150, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV19502 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., June 17, 2026) is a class action complaint arising from the Defendant's unlawful rent increase and improper rent collection. According to the complaint, R&E abuses the Systematic Code Enforcement fee regulations by creating the Illegal Addendum, an illegal contract provision requiring tenants to pay SCEP fees during the first year of tenancy without regard to the condition precedent as to whether R&E had paid its SCEP invoice to the City for the subsequent year. Graham is a tenant of R&E who has signed the Illegal Addendum as part of the overall rental agreement. R&E Management as a commercial and residential real estate and property investment management firm in California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Daniel J. Bramzon, Esq. BASTA, INC. 1545 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 600 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 736-5050 E-mail: bastaEservice@basta.org RACK ROOM SHOES: Santiago Suit Removed to W.D. Washington --------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as John Santiago, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. RACK ROOM SHOES, INC., Case No. 26-2-09202-3 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Pierce, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on July 9, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-05748-TLF. The Plaintiff contends that Rack Room violated the Commercial Electronic Mail Act ("CEMA"), and the Washington Consumer Protection Act ("CPA"), by allegedly sending Washington consumers, including Plaintiff "Limited Sale Emails with false and misleading information" that misleads consumers "about sale durations, inducing urgency that affects purchasing decisions," "clogs email inboxes with false information," and violates consumers "right to be free from deceptive commercial emails."[BN] The Defendant is represented by: Meegan B. Brooks, Esq. BALLARD SPAHR LLP 71 Stevenson Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415.318.2772 Email: brooksm@ballardspahr.com RAWLINGS SPORTING: Giles Suit Removed to W.D. Washington -------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Ashley Giles and Kevin Snider, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. RAWLINGS SPORTING GOODS COMPANY, INC., Case No. 26-2-05811-31 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington, Snohomish County, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on July 9, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02395. The Complaint asserts claims for violation of Washington's Commercial Electronic Mail Act, and violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act. The Plaintiffs' claims arise from allegations that Defendant transmitted dozens of electronic messages that contained false or misleading information in the subject line for purposes of promoting Defendant's product sales.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Samuel Strauss, Esq. Raina C. Borelli, Esq. STRAUSS BORRELLI PLLC 980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 Email: sam@straussborrelli.com raina@straussborrelli.com - and – M. Anderson Berry, Esq. Brook E. Garberding, Esq. Gregory Haroutunian, Esq. Brandon P. Jack, Esq. EMERY REDDY, PC 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1100 Settle, WA 98101 Email: anderson@emeryreddy.com brook@emeryreddy.com gregory@emeryreddy.com brandon@emeryreddy.com - and – Alexander E. Wolf, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 280 South Beverly Drive, PH Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Email: awolf@milberg.com The Defendants are represented by: Tyler L. Farmer, Esq. Ariel A. Martinez, Esq. MARTINEZ & FARMER LLP 4020 East Madison St., Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98112 Phone: (206) 208-2270 - and – Mark A. Silver, Esq. Leanne E. Sunderland, Esq. DENTONS US LLP 303 Peachtree Rd NE, Suite 5300 Atlanta, GA 30308 Phone: (404) 527-4000 Email: mark.silver@dentons.com leanne.sunderland@dentons.com RKR TRAFFIC: Fails to Pay Proper Overtime Wages, Cornett Suit Says ------------------------------------------------------------------ KIMBERLY CORNETT, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff v. RKR TRAFFIC CONTROL, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-01589 (N.D. Ohio, July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for its willful failure to pay Plaintiff and other employees overtime wages, seeking all available relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act. According to the complaint, during the three years preceding the filing of this complaint, Named Plaintiff and the FLSA Collective worked more than 40 hours in one or more workweek(s) and Defendant was aware or should have been aware of such work, but Named Plaintiff and the FLSA Collective were not fully paid for all overtime compensation. The Defendant knew or should have known of the overtime payment requirements of the FLSA. Despite such knowledge, the Defendant willfully withheld and failed to pay the overtime compensation to which Named Plaintiff and the FLSA Collective are entitled to, says the suit. Named Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant as an hourly, non-exempt employee believed to be in the position of Flagger and general laborer for over three years and is currently still employed by Defendant in Tiffin, Ohio. RKR Traffic Control, LLC provides traffic management services for communities and organizations across the U.S. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Daniel I. Bryant, Esq. BRYANT LEGAL, LLC 1550 Old Henderson Road, Suite 126 Columbus, OH 43220 Telephone: (614) 704-0546 Facsimile: (614) 573-9826 E-mail: dbryant@bryantlegalllc.com - and - Matthew B. Bryant, Esq. Esther E. Bryant, Esq. BRYANT LEGAL, LLC 3131 Executive Parkway, Suite 106 Toledo, OH 43606 Telephone: (419) 824-4439 Facsimile: (419) 932-6719 E-mail: mbryant@bryantlegalllc.com ebryant@bryantlegalllc.com ROCKLEY PHOTONICS: $10MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 20 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP issued a statement regarding the Rockley Securities Litigation: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KENNETH S. GROSSMAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. DAVID SIN, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:23-cv-09501-MRA-MAA CLASS ACTION SUMMARY NOTICE IF YOU PURCHASED OR ACQUIRED ROCKLEY PHOTONICS HOLDINGS LIMITED ("ROCKLEY") COMMON STOCK BETWEEN AUGUST 11, 2021, AND JANUARY 23, 2023 (THE "CLASS"), YOU COULD RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. CERTAIN PERSONS ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE DEFINITION OF THE CLASS AS SET FORTH IN THE STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, that the litigation (the "Litigation") has been certified as a class action and that a Settlement has been proposed for $10,000,000 in cash. A hearing will be held on October 20, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., before the Honorable Monica Ramirez Almadani, at the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 411 W. 4th Street, Santa Ana, California 92701, in Courtroom 9B, 9th Floor, for the purpose of determining whether: (1) the proposed Settlement should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (2) the proposed Plan of Allocation for distribution of the Settlement proceeds is fair, reasonable, and adequate and therefore should be approved; (3) the application of Lead Counsel for the payment of attorneys' fees and litigation expenses from the Settlement Fund, including interest earned thereon, and an amount for Lead Plaintiffs pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78u-4(a)(4) in connection with their representation of the Class, should be approved; and (4) the Court should enter the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE CLASS, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE SETTLEMENT OF THE LITIGATION, AND YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO SHARE IN THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND. If you have not received a detailed Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (the "Notice") and a copy of the Proof of Claim and Release, you may obtain a copy of these documents by contacting the Claims Administrator: Rockley Securities Settlement, Claims Administrator, c/o Verita Global, P.O. Box 301170, Los Angeles, CA 90030-1170, 1-888-663-7634. You may also obtain copies of the Stipulation of Settlement, Notice, and Proof of Claim and Release at www.RockleySecuritiesSettlement.com. If you are a Class Member, to be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must submit a Proof of Claim and Release by mail postmarked no later than October 15, 2026, or submit it online by that date, establishing that you are entitled to a recovery. If you do not submit a valid Proof of Claim and Release, you will not share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, but you will still be bound by any judgment entered by the Court in this Litigation (including the releases provided for therein). If you are a Class Member and do not exclude yourself from the Class, you will be bound by any judgment entered by the Court in this Litigation (including the releases provided for therein) whether or not you submit a Proof of Claim and Release. To exclude yourself from the Class, you must submit a written request for exclusion that is postmarked (or received if no postmark) no later than September 29, 2026, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice. If you request exclusion, you will not recover money pursuant to the Settlement. Any objection to the proposed Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or the fee and expense application must be filed with the Court and delivered such that it is received by each of the following no later than September 29, 2026: Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLERK OF THE COURT Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse 411 W. 4th Street, Room 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Lead Counsel: ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP THEODORE J. PINTAR 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 1-800-449-4900 Defendants' Counsel: PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP BRUCE A. ERICSON Four Embarcadero Center 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT, THE CLERK'S OFFICE, DEFENDANTS, OR DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL REGARDING THIS NOTICE. If you have any questions about the Settlement, or your eligibility to participate in the Settlement, you may contact Lead Counsel at the address and phone number listed above. DATED: June 26, 2026 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROUTE APP INC: Biada Suit Removed to D. Utah -------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Katelyn Biada, Victoria Kortesmaki, and Alejandro Martinez, for themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ROUTE APP, INC., and ROUTE INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, LLC, Case No. 260402427 was removed from the Fourth Judicial District Court in and for Utah County, to the United States District Court for District of Utah on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-00651. The Plaintiffs purport to bring four causes of action on behalf of themselves and the putative class members: "Declaratory Relief"; "Violation of the Utah Insurance Code"; "Unjust Enrichment"; and (4) "Injunctive Relief". The Plaintiffs allege that Defendants sell "shipping insurance policies on the websites of thousands of partner online retailers during the online checkout process."[BN] The Defendants are represented by: David W. Tufts, Esq. Lyndon R. Bradshaw, Esq. Ian M. Kinghorn, Esq. DENTONS DURHAM JONES PINEGAR, P.C. 111 South Main, Suite 2400 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Phone: (801) 415-3000 Email: david.tufts@dentons.com ndon.bradshaw@dentons.com ian.kinghorn@dentons.com ROYALTY HEATING & AIR: Dixon Files TCPA Suit in E.D. California --------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Royalty Heating & Air, Inc. The case is styled as Trevor Dixon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Royalty Heating & Air, Inc., Case No. 2:26-at-01161 (E.D. Cal., July 10, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Royalty Heating & Air, Inc. -- https://www.royaltyheatingair.com/ -- is a HVAC contractor in Roseville, California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott A. Edelsberg, I, Esq. EDELSBERG LAW PA 1925 Century Park E, Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (305) 975-3320 Email: scott@edelsberglaw.com SAFEBUILT INSURANCE: Miller Suit Removed to N.D. Illinois --------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Claudia Miller, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. SAFEBUILT INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC; INTEGRATED SPECIALTY COVERAGES, LLC; and THIRD COAST INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 2026 CH 05018 was removed from the Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, to the United States District Court for Northern District of Illinois on July 9, 2026, and assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-08105. The Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated Illinois and California state law by misrepresenting the coverage afforded by the insurance products Defendants issued to Plaintiff and others similarly situated. Specifically, Plaintiff claims that Defendants allegedly marketed and sold illusory insurance policies and certificates of insurance that supposedly allowed Defendants to deny coverage based on undisclosed terms or to limit payment of the claims to a fraction of the policy limit.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Kristen E. Hudson, Esq. David S. Becker, Esq. Briana Y. Hammons, Esq. DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC 71 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: (312) 641-0060 Facsimile: (844) 670-6009 Email: khudson@dickinson-wright.com dbecker@dickinson-wright.com bhammons@dickinson-wright.com SAM'S AUTOMOTIVE: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, Leib Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------- MICHAEL LEIB, individually, and on behalf of other similarly situated employees, Plaintiff v. SAM'S AUTOMOTIVE CARE, INC.; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV21802 (Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., Cal., July 10, 2026) is a class action to recover damages on behalf of Plaintiff and all current and former hourly-paid and/or non-exempt employees who worked for Defendants in the State of California at any time during the period from four years prior to the date of the filing of this Complaint through final judgment. The complaint relates that the the Plaintiff has performed various duties for Defendants including, among other things, providing customer service, performing opening and closing procedures, receiving and transferring inventory, and measuring and dispensing oils. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants are engaged in a pattern and practice of wage abuse against their hourly-paid and/or non-exempt employees. Defendants hired Plaintiff and Class Members but, among other things, failed to properly pay them all wages owed for all time worked (including minimum wages, straight time wages, and overtime wages), failed to provide them with all meal periods and rest periods and associated premium wages to which they were entitled, failed to timely pay them all wages due during their employment, failed to timely pay them all wages due upon termination of their employment, failed to provide them with accurate itemized wage statements, and failed to reimburse them for necessary business expenses. The Plaintiff alleges that each Defendant is in some manner intentionally, negligently, or otherwise responsible for the alleged acts, omissions, occurrences, and transactions. As a result, Defendants violated the California Labor Code, and the applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order, says the suit. Through this action, Plaintiff seeks to recover all available remedies including but not limited to actual and liquidated damages and attorney's fees and costs. Plaintiff MICHAEL LEIB worked for Defendants from approximately September 2024 through the present as a Lube Technician. Defendant SAM'S AUTOMOTIVE CARE, INC. operates automotive oil change and lubrication shops.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ryan T. Chuman, Esq. Arnel 0. Tan, Esq. BLACKSTONE LAW, APC 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 745 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Telephone: (310) 622-4278 Facsimile: (855) 786-6356 E-mail: rchuman@blackstonepc.com atan@blackstonepc.com SANDISK LLC: Renewed Motion for Class Certification Tossed ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned re Sandisk SSDS Litigation, Case No. 3:23-cv-04152-RFL (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Lin entered an order denying the Plaintiffs' renewed motion for class certification. The Court says that the Plaintiffs have identified no intervening change in law and no new evidence that has become available since the Court's class certification order. The Plaintiffs also do not argue that the Court failed to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments that were presented to it. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs' renewed class certification motion is denied. On May 6, 2026, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification. The Defendant is a technology company that engages in the manufacture and sale of data storage devices including external solid-state drives, known as SSDs. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=QJcWTq at no extra charge.[CC] SCHNEIDERMAN FURNITURE: Lopez Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York ------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Schneiderman Furniture, Inc. The case is styled as Victor Lopez, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated v. Schneiderman Furniture, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-05861 (S.D.N.Y., July 10, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Schneiderman Furniture, Inc. -- https://www.schneidermans.com/ -- offers furniture, mattresses, and home accessories for all living spaces, including outdoor areas.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Dana Lauren Gottlieb, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES 150 E. 18 St., Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Phone: (212) 228-9795 Email: danalgottlieb@aol.com nyjg@aol.com SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING: Lerma Suit Removed to E.D. Washington ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Matthias Andrew Lerma, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, INC.; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Case No. 26-2-01896-32 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Spokane County, to the United States District Court for Eastern District of Washington on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-00290-SAB. The Plaintiff alleges under Washington law that SEL did not give proper rest and meal breaks, and did not fully compensate for overtime and sick pay, and underpaid wages. The Plaintiff further alleges that SEL included restrictions prohibited by Washington law in its terms of employment[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Erika Lane, Esq. Brandon Brouillette, Esq. Zachary M. Crosner, Esq. CROSNER LEGAL, PC 92 Lenora Street, #179 Seattle, WA 98121 Phone: (866) 276-7637 Email: erika@crosnerlegal.com bbrouillette@crosnerlegal.com zach@crosnerlegal.com The Defendants are represented by: William H. Walsh, Esq. Karl Neumann, Esq. COZEN O'CONNOR 999 Third Avenue Suite 1900 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 340-1000 Fax: 206-621-8783 Email: wwalsh@cozen.com kneumann@cozen.com SEALIFT INC: Dziennik Files Writ of Mandamus Petition to 2nd Cir. ----------------------------------------------------------------- SYLVESTER DZIENNIK, et al. filed on July 15, 2026, a petition for writ of mandamus with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, under Case No. 26-1909, in connection with an Order in the lawsuit styled as In Re: Sylvester Dziennik, Case No. 1:05-cv-4659, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The case type is stated as Original Proceeding, Mandamus. [BN] Plaintiffs-Petitioners SYLVESTER DZIENNIK, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, are represented by: Richard J. Dodson, Sr., Esq. DODSON & HOOKS, APLC 112 Founders Drive Baton Rouge, LA 70810 Defendants-Respondents SEALIFT INC., et al. are represented by: Gordon Scott Arnott, Esq. HILL, BETTS & NASH LLP 14 Wall Street, Suite 5H New York, NY 10005 SEATTLE CONCESSIONS: Hendricks Suit Removed to W.D. Washington -------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Kelly Hendricks, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated v. SEATTLE CONCESSIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation; DELAWARE NORTH COMPANIES SPORTSERVICE, INC. a Delaware Corporation, Case No. 26-2-17904-2 KNT was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for King County, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on July 13, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02471. The Complaint asserts a variety of putative class claims, including but not limited to failure to pay wages for time worked including overtime; rest break violations; meal period violations; and failure to accrue and allow use of paid sick time. The Complaint seeks compensatory and double damages and attorney fees and costs.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Douglas Han, Esq. Shunt Tatavos-Gharajeh, Esq. Winthrop Hubbard, Esq. JUSTICE LAW CORPORATION 1215 4th Ave., Suite 1630 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (360) 207-0000 Facsimile: (818) 230-7259 Email: dhan@justicelawcorp.com statavos@justicelawscorp.com whubbard@justicelawcorp.com The Defendants are represented by: Scott Prange, Esq. Emma Kazaryan, Esq. SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 999 Third Avenue, Suite 4700 Seattle, WA 98104-4041 Phone: (206) 946-4910 Email: sprange@seyfarth.com ekazaryan@seyfarth.com SELENE FINANCE: England Suit Seeks to Certify Class & Subclass -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as CHRISTEL ENGLAND, KAREN MEYERS, and ANGELA JOYNER-PERRY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. SELENE FINANCE, LP, Case No. 1:23-cv-00847-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order: (a) certifying the North Carolina State Law Class and the FDCPA Sub-Class under Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3), or in the alternative certifying a liability issues class under Rule 23(c)(4); North Carolina State Law Class (NCDCA and NCCAA): "All North Carolina residential mortgagors to whom Selene sent a NC Final Letter, defined as a NOD Letter (Selene Template DM001) and/or a North Carolina Disclosure (Selene Template DM018), or any substantially similar form, between Oct. 4, 2019 and the date an order approving class notice is Entered." This class is represented by Plaintiffs Christel England, Karen Meyers, and Angela Joyner-Perry. FDCPA Sub-Class: "All North Carolina residential mortgagors whose servicing rights were acquired by Selene when their loan was in a state of delinquency or default, and to whom Selene sent a NOD Letter (Selene Template DM001) and/or a North Carolina Disclosure (Selene Template DM018), or any substantially similar form, between Oct. 4, 2022 and the date an order approving class notice is entered." This sub-class is represented by Plaintiffs Christel England and Karen Meyers only; (b) appointing the Plaintiffs Christel England, Karen Meyers, and Angela JoynerPerry as representatives of the North Carolina State Law Class, and Plaintiffs Christel England and Karen Meyers as representatives of the FDCPA SubClass; and (c) appointing the undersigned as class counsel under Rule 23(g). The action challenges Defendant Selene Finance, LP's uniform practice of sending North Carolina residential mortgage borrowers standardized "NC Final Letters" -- a "Notice of Default and Intent to Accelerate" (the "NOD Letter," Selene Template DM001) and a "North Carolina Disclosure" (Selene Template DM018)—that deceptively threaten acceleration and foreclosure on a deadline at which Selene’s own internal policies and federal law prohibit it from accelerating or foreclosing. Selene operates as a residential mortgage company. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=04lmAv at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Scott C. Harris, Esq. BRYSON HARRIS SUCIU & DeMAY, PLLC 900 W. Morgan Street Raleigh, NC 27603 Telephone: (919) 600-5000 Facsimile: (919) 600-5035 E-mail: sharris@brysonpllc.com SENTRY CREDIT: Faces Lyons Consumer Credit Suit in S.D. Fla. ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sentry Credit, Inc. The case is captioned as Paul Lyons individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated employees v. Sentry Credit, Inc., Case No: 0:26-cv-61718-WPD (S.D. Fla., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit is related to consumer credit claims. Sentry Credit, Inc. is a privately held debt recovery and receivables management company founded in 1992 and based in Everett, Washington.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Zane Charles Hedaya, Esq. Samuel Joseph Awad, Esq. THE LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI 1515 NE 26th St Wilton Manors, FL 33305 Telephone: (813) 340-8838 E-mail: zane@jibraellaw.com SHIPSURANCE INSURANCE: Drouillard Suit Removed to C.D. California ----------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Bruno Drouillard, Alan Hewett, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Shipsurance Insurance Services, Inc., Case No. 26STCV18032 was removed from the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on July 10, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-07516 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Shipsurance -- https://www.shipsurance.com/ -- is a shipping insurance company offering coverage for shipments sent via the major shipping carriers worldwide.[BN] The Plaintiff appears pro se. The Defendant is represented by: Susan Ying Ly, Esq. FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE AND REATH LLP 1800 Century Park East, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (310) 203-4000 Fax: (310) 229-1285 Email: susan.ly@faegredrinker.com SKINNYCORP LLC: Brooks Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Timothy Brooks, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated v. SKINNYCORP, LLC, doing business as: THREADLESS, LLC, Case No. 26-2-18864-5 SEA was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington for the County of King, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02441. The Plaintiff seeks "all available relief, including an injunction" for Threadless' alleged violations of the Commercial Electronic Mail Act ("CEMA"). For Threadless' alleged violations of the Consumer Protection Act ("CPA"), Plaintiff alleges that he and the putative class members are entitled to "an injunction against further violations; the greater of Plaintiff's actual damages or liquidated damages of $500 per violation, trebled; and costs of the suit, including a reasonable attorneys' fee."[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Samuel J. Strauss, Esq. Raina C. Borrelli, Esq. STRAUSS & BORRELLI PLLC 980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: (872) 263-1100 Fax: (872) 263-1109 Email: sam@straussborrelli.com raina@straussborrelli.com - and - Kelly Drew Rooksby, Esq. Cheyenne Frazier, Esq. GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 546 North Jefferson Lane, Suite 302 Spokane, WA 99201 Phone: (509) 241-8865 Facsimile: (509) 590-4344 Email: krooksby@grsm.com cfrazier@grsm.com The Defendants are represented by: Jessica R. Maziarz, Esq. FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 1500 K Street NW, Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20005 Phone: (202) 842-8800 Facsimile: (202) 842-8465 Email: jessica.maziarz@faegredrinker.com SKYWEST AIRLINES: Class Cert Hearing Remains on August 6 -------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Campbell v. Skywest Airlines, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-02141 (S.D. Cal., Filed Nov. 14, 2024), the Hon. Judge Todd W. Robinson entered an order that the hearing date for Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, will remain on August 6, 2026. The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). SkyWest is an American regional airline.[CC] SOLVENTUM CORP: Faces Rucco Personal Injury Suit in D. Minn. ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Solventum Corporation. The case is captioned as Joseph E. Rucco on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated employees v. Solventum Corporation, Case No. 0:26-cv-02995-KMM-JFD (D. Minn., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit arises from personal injury-related issue. Solventum Corporation is a spun off from 3M as an independent healthcare company which focuses on medical technology, health information, wound care, and oral care solutions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jean Sutton Martin, Esq. AYLSTOCK, WITKIN, KREIS & OVERHOLTZ, PLC 17 E. Main Street, Suite 200 Pensacola, FL 32502 Telephone: (850) 202-1010 Email: jeanmartin@forthepeople.com - and - Karen Hanson Riebel, Esq. LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP 100 Washington Ave S Ste 2200 Mpls, MN 55401-2179 Telephone: (612) 339-6900 Facsimile: (612) 339-0981 Email: Khriebel@locklaw.com - and - Kate M. Baxter-Kauf, Esq. LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP 100 Washington Ave S Ste 2200 Mpls, MN 55401-2179 Telephone: (612) 339-6900 Facsimile: (612) 339-0981 Email: kmbaxter-kauf@locklaw.com SOUTH DAKOTA: Plaintiffs' Bid for Class Certification Tossed ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as MICAH DONALD HEWITT, v. NICK LAMB, Secretary of Corrections, Individual & Official Capacity; JOSEPH ROEMMICH, Warden of South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individual & Official Capacity; et al., Case No. 4:26-cv-04087-ECS (D.S.D.), the Hon. Judge Schulte entered an order that: -- Hewitt's first motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. -- Hewitt's second motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. -- The Plaintiffs motion for class certification is denied. -- Hewitt's motion to appoint Counsel is denied. -- Hewitt's motion to expedite motions is granted in part. The Defendants shall respond to Hewitt's motions for preliminary injunction within 14 days from the date of service. -- Hewitt's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Dr. Alvand, Evans, Kummer, Revolorio, Dr. Lee, Lamb, Roemmieh, Hofer, Maturan, Johnston, Pirgglia, and Dr. Haynes in their official capacities for equitable relief survive section 1915A screening. -- Hewitt's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Dr. Alvand, Evans, Kummer, Revolorio, Dr. Lee, Lamb, Roemmieh, Hofer, and Maturan in their individual capacities for money damages survive section 1915A screening. Accordingly, Hewitt cannot maintain claims on behalf of others or as a class while proceeding pro se. Thus, Hewitt's class action claims and claims on behalf of others are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sections 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(l). Further, the Plaintiffs motion for class certification is denied. The defendants include SHELDON HOFER, Housing Sergeant of East/Federal Hall at South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individual & Official Capacity; DARA ALVAND, DDS, Dentist at South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individual & Official Capacity; MICHELLE EVANS, RDA, Dental assistant at South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individual & Official Capacity; RICK JOHNSTON, Associate Warden of South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individual & Official Capacity; DR. AARON HAYNES, MD, Medical Director at South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individual & Official Capacity; DESIRAE KUMMER, Medical Charge RN at South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individual & Official Capacity; AMBER PIRGGLIA, Director of South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individual & Official Capacity; CIERRA REVOBRIO, Nursing Manager at South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individually & Official Capacity; MELISSA MATURAN, Grievance Coordinator at South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individual & Official Capacity; DR. MICHAEL LEE, Chief Dental Officer at South Dakota State Penitentiary, Individual & Official Capacity. A copy of the Court's order dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=zRrwvg at no extra charge.[CC] STEFANO PESSINA: NT Combined Files Suit in Del. Chancery Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against STEFANO PESSINA, et al. The case is styled as NT Combined Investments Inc., on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated former stockholders of WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC. v. STEFANO PESSINA, TIMOTHY WENTWORTH, GINGER L. GRAHAM, JANICE M. BABIAK, INDERPAL S. BHANDARI, BRYAN C. HANSON, ROBERT L. HUFFINES, VALERIE B. JARRETT, JOHN A. LEDERER, THOMAS E. POLEN, NANCY M. SCHLICHTING, and WILLIAM H. SHRANK, Case No. 2026-0895-NAC (Del. Chancery Ct., July 9, 2026). The case type is stated as "Breach of Fiduciary Duty in the Corporate Context." Stefano Pessina is an Italian-Monegasque billionaire businessman; he was the executive chairman of Walgreens Boots Alliance until its acquisition by Sycamore Partners in 2025.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ned Weinberger, Esq. Brendan W. Sullivan, Esq. Mark D. Richardson, Esq. LABATON KELLER SUCHAROW LLP 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1510 Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 573-2540 Email: nweinberger@labaton.com bsullivan@labaton.com mrichardson@labaton.com STEPHEN SMITH: Bid to Decertify Classes Tossed ---------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as A.M.C., by her next friend, C.D.C., et al., v. STEPHEN SMITH, in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Finance and Administration and Director of the Division of TennCare, Case No. 3:20-cv-00240 (M.D. Tenn.), the Hon. Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr. entered a judgment denying the motion to decertify Plaintiffs' two Rule 23(b)(2) classes. The Court's conclusion that section 1396a(a)(3) is not enforceable by individuals under section 1983 follows other courts. The Court reaches this conclusion carefully, respectful of published Sixth Circuit precedent and with little doubt that when given the opportunity the Sixth Circuit will come to the same conclusion. The Court holds that section 1396a(a)(3) does not pass the Gonzaga test, therefore the Plaintiffs' Medicaid Act claims are not enforceable under section 1983 and must be dismissed. Prior to trial, the Court certified two classes -- "Plaintiff Class" and "Disability Subclass." The Court engaged in a vigorous Rule 23(b) analysis regarding TennCare policies and procedures that resulted in individuals losing TennCare coverage in violation of the Due Process Clause and the Medicaid Act. The "Plaintiff Class" consisted of individuals who "have been or will be disenrolled from TennCare," and the "Disability Subclass" applied to "Plaintiff Class members who are 'qualified individuals with a disability' as defined in 42 U.S.C." A copy of the Court's memorandum opinion dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=UYEAbH at no extra charge.[CC] SUNNYSIDE, WA: Court Enters Scheduling Order -------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as MICHAEL R. GONZALEZ- CRONEMEYER, v. CITY OF SUNNYSIDE, a municipal corporation, Case No. 1:26-cv-03097-RLP (E.D. Wash.), the Hon. Judge Pennell entered a SCHEDULING ORDER as follows: Jury Trial September 13, 2027 Rule 26(a)(1) Exchange: July 23, 2026 Discovery Cutoff: Apr. 26, 2027 Daubert Motions: March 5, 2027 Dispositive Motions: May 4, 2027 Motions in Limine: Aug. 2, 2027 Pretrial conference: Aug. 26, 2027, 10:00 a.m. Jury trial: Sept. 13, 2027 Sunnyside is located in Fresno County in the State of California A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Q0kZgX at no extra charge.[CC] SWEEPSTEAKS LTD: Seeks to Strike Class Allegations in Ridley Suit ----------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as LaShawnna Ridley, Regina Ridley, Tiffany Hines, Stephine Hines, Preddy Ray, Dekeya Adams, Ricola Lawshea, and Latosha Sanderlin (STAKE.US USERS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES), Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. SWEEPSTEAKS LTD. d/b/a STAKE.US, KICK STREAMING PTY LTD., AUBREY DRAKE GRAHAM p/k/a DRAKE, ADIN ROSS, AND GEORGE NGUYEN, Case No. 1:25-cv-02511-LMB-WEF (E.D. Va.), the Defendants ask the Court, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(c)(1)(A) and 23(d)(1)(D), to enter an order denying class certification and striking the class allegations asserted in the Plaintiffs' second amended complaint ("SAC"). The reasons supporting this Motion are set forth in the accompanying memorandum of law filed contemporaneously with this Motion. Stake.us provides online social casino experience. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=0RSI31 at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Hillary Dang, Esq. David McGill, Esq. Diana Szego Fassbender, Esq. Ian Hawkes, Esq. Paige Pavone, Esq. Marc R. Shapiro, Esq. ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20037 Telephone: (202) 339-8400 Facsimile: (202) 339-8500 E-mail: hdang@orrick.com dmcgill@orrick.com dszego@orrick.com ihawkes@orrick.com ppavone@orrick.com mrshapiro@orrick.com TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS: Ressler Suit Removed to S.D. Florida ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Aaron Ressler, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and John and Jane Does 1-10, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS LLC, and VIERA BUILDERS, INC., Case No. 2026-011484-CA-01 was removed from the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County, to the United States District Court for Southern District of Florida on July 9, 2026, and assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-24714-XXXX. The Plaintiff alleges that, despite knowing or having reason to know that the Shingles were defectively designed and manufactured, TAMKO continued to design, manufacture, market, advertise, and sell the Shingles without disclosing the alleged defects. Based on these allegations, Plaintiff asserts claims against Defendants for violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act; strict products liability for design defect, manufacturing defect, and failure to warn; negligence; negligent misrepresentation; unjust enrichment; violation of Florida's Misleading Advertising Statute; and declaratory relief.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Francis M. Mcdonald, Jr., Esq. Sarah A. Long, Esq. Annalisa Gobin, Esq. MCDONALD TOOLE RICHMAN & CORRENTI, P.A. 111 N. Magnolia Avenue, Suite 1200 Orlando, FL 32801 Phone: (407) 246-1800 Email: resslervtamko@mtrclegal.com fmcdonald@mtrclegal.com slong@mtrclegal.com agobin@mtrclegal.com TELLURIDE RESORT: Alvarez Appeals Final Judgment to 10th Circuit ---------------------------------------------------------------- KARINA RUIZ ALVAREZ, et al. are taking an appeal from a court order granting the Defendant's motion for summary judgment in the lawsuit entitled Karina Ruiz Alvarez, et al., individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Telluride Resort Partners, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:23-CV-00354-JLK-CYC, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The suit is brought against the Defendant for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. On May 20, 2024, the Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, while the Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. On Feb. 2, 2026, Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung entered an Order and Recommendation to grant the Defendant's motion for summary judgment and to deny the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification without prejudice. On June 17, 2026, Judge John L. Kane entered an Order adopting Judge Chung's recommendation. The Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted. Final judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiffs. The appellate case is styled as Alvarez, et al. v. Telluride Resort Partners, LLC, Case No. 26-1286, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, filed on July 17, 2026. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellants KARINA RUIZ ALVAREZ, et al., individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, are represented by: Alexander Hood, Esq. David Hollis Seligman, Esq. TOWARDS JUSTICE 1580 North Logan Street, Suite 660 PMB 44465 Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (720) 239-2606 (720) 248-8426 - and - Brandt Milstein, Esq. MILSTEIN TURNER 2400 Broadway, Suite B Boulder, CO 80304 - and - Andrew Hess Turner, Esq. MILSTEIN TURNER 1490 Lafayette Street, Suite 304 Denver, CO 80218 Telephone: (303) 957-5754 Defendant-Appellee TELLURIDE RESORT PARTNERS, LLC is represented by: Nathan Schacht, Esq. Samantha Jeannine Tillotson, Esq. Courtney Witten, Esq. BAKER & HOSTETLER 1801 California Street, Suite 4400 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 861-0600 - and - Mark D. Temple, Esq. REED SMITH 1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2100 Houston, TX 77010 Telephone: (713) 469-3800 TEXAS: Faces Washington Detainees' Suit in W.D. Tex. ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Marsha McLane et al. The case is captioned as William Washington, Gary Cardenas, Joseph Calzada, Randy Dupree, Seth Hill, Timothy Johnson, Bill Ratliff and all others similarly situated employees v. Marsha McLane, Kara Gouglar, in their official capacity and individual capacity of Texas Civil Commitment Office; and Management & Training Corporation, in their official capacity, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-01709-DAE-DH (W.D. Tex., June 17, 2026). The lawsuit is related to prisoner petitions and conditions of confinement of civil detainees. The Texas Civil Commitment Office is responsible for providing monitoring and treatment of civilly committed sexually violent predators. Management & Training Corporation provides academic, career, technical, and social skills training, alongside rehabilitative and correctional services.[BN] The Plaintiffs are appears pro se. TEXTRON AVIATION: Class Cert Filing in Barry Amended to Dec. 17 --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as KIMBERLY BARRY, individually and for others similarly situated, v. TEXTRON AVIATION INC, Case No. 6:25-cv-01271-AWM-JBW (D. Kan.), the Hon. Judge Wieland entered an Amended Phase I Scheduling Order as follows: Event Deadline Jointly filed mediation notice: Aug. 28, 2026 Mediation deadline: Oct. 29, 2026 All Phase I discovery complete: Nov. 5, 2026 Motion for conditional and/or class Dec. 17, 2026 certification: Response in opposition to motion: Jan. 14, 2027 Reply in support of motion: Jan. 28, 2027 The Amended Phase I Scheduling Order will not be modified except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause. Textron provides airborne solutions for government, military and commercial customers. A copy of the Court's order dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=e3lV6Z at no extra charge.[CC] THERMA LLC: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, Rivas Alleges -------------------------------------------------------- LUIS RIVAS, individually, and on behalf of other similarly situated employees, Plaintiff v. THERMA LLC; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV21745 (Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., Cal., July 10, 2026) is a class action to recover damages on behalf of Plaintiff and all current and former hourly-paid and non-exempt employees who worked for Defendants in the State of California. The complaint relates that the Plaintiff performed various duties for Defendants including, among other things, maintaining building systems and facilities, replacing filters and bearings, calibrating pneumatic thermostats, troubleshooting and repairing electrical issues, and monitoring facility operations to ensure proper functionality and safety. The Plaintiff alleges, that Defendants engaged in a pattern and practice of wage abuse against their hourly-paid and non-exempt employees. This wage abuse involved requiring Plaintiff and the other Class Members to work off-the-clock without compensation, failing to properly pay wages for all hours worked, failing to provide all meal and rest breaks to which they were entitled and failing to pay meal and rest break premiums when due, failing to timely pay wages during employment and upon termination of employment, failing to provide accurate wage statements, failing to reimburse necessary business-related expenses, and failing to adhere to other related protections afforded by the California Labor Code and the applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders. The Defendants knew or should have known that they had a duty to compensate Plaintiff and the other Class Members pursuant to California law. Defendants had the financial ability to pay such compensation, but willfully, knowingly, and intentionally failed to do so to increase Defendants' profits, says the suit. Through this action, Plaintiff seeks to recover all available remedies including but not limited to actual and liquidated damages and attorney's fees and costs. Plaintiff LUIS RIVAS worked for Defendants from February 2021 through August 2025 as an Operations Engineer. Defendant THERMA LLC is one of California's commercial HVAC contractors. DOES 1 through 25 are the fictitiously named Defendants.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Barbara DuVan-Clarke, Esq. Danielle L. GruppChang, Esq. P.J. Van Ert, Esq. Melissa Rodriguez, Esq. BLACKSTONE LAW, APC 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 745 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Telephone: (310) 622-4278 Facsimile: (855) 786-6356 E-mail: BDC@blackstonepc.com dgruppchang@blackstonepc.com pjvanert@blackstonepc.com mrodriguez@blackstonepc.com bdcservice@blackstonepc.com TITAN COMMUNICATIONS: Faces Villalpando Wage-and-Hour Suit in Cal. ------------------------------------------------------------------ MANUEL VILLALPANDO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. TITAN COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV21785 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for violations of California Labor Code and California's Business and Professions Code including failure to pay all wages, failure to provide meal periods, failure to provide rest periods, failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements, failure to reimburse for necessary business expenditures, failure to pay waiting time penalties, and unlawful business practices. The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendants as a non-exempt hourly employee until his employment ended in July of 2025. Titan Communications, LLC is a technology service provider, with its principal place of business in Chatsworth, California. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brian Zaghi, Esq. Zachary T. Chrzan, Esq. Nur Egilmezcan, Esq. ZAGHI & CHRZAN, LLP 10880 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1101 Los Angeles, CA 90024 Telephone: (310) 230-5353 Email: brian@zclawyers.com zach@zclawyers.com nur@zclawyers.com TLCH FOODS INC: Erwin Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ----------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Melissa Erwin, on her own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated v. TLCH FOODS, INC., d/b/a GOBBLE, Case No. 26-2-05868-31 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for Snohomish County, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02430. The Plaintiff alleges that TLCH violated Washington's Commercial Electronic Mail Act ("CEMA") and the Consumer Protection Act ("CPA") by sending marketing emails to Washington consumers with false and misleading subject lines.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Samuel J. Strauss, Esq. Raina C. Borrelli, Esq. STRAUSS & BORRELLI PLLC 980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: (872) 263-1100 Fax: (872) 263-1109 Email: sam@straussborrelli.com raina@straussborrelli.com The Defendants are represented by: Vanessa Soriano Power, Esq. Jenna M. Poligo, Esq. STOEL RIVES LLP 600 University Street, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 624-0900 Email: vanessa.power@stoel.com jenna.poligo@stoel.com TOYOTA INDUSTRIES: Class Settlement in Broadmoor Gets Final Nod --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as BROADMOOR LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO., et al., v. TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-06640-JSC (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley entered an order granting the Plaintiffs' motion for final approval of the parties' class action settlement. In addition, the Court grants the Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and costs; specifically, the Court awards the following: $74,875,000 in attorney's fees; $280,456.71 in litigation costs; and $50,000 ($2,500 each) in incentive awards for the Class Representatives. The parties shall provide updates regarding the claims administration every 30 days up through the September 22, 2026 claims deadline. To the extent the parties agree to a different schedule including a staged process for a motion to approve distribution as discussed at the final approval hearing, they shall file a stipulation with these dates. The parties shall file a proposed judgment on or before July 24, 2026. The Plaintiffs filed this putative class action alleging the Defendants engaged in a pattern of misconduct in the design, development, and testing of gasoline and diesel-powered forklifts and their engines. The Agreement defines the Settlement Class as: "All persons or entities that purchased a Settlement Class Vehicle, or leased a Settlement Class Vehicle, through the date of filing of the Motion for Preliminary Approval." Toyota is a Japanese multinational automotive manufacturer. A copy of the Court's order dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=a2lWdS at no extra charge.[CC] TOYOTA MOTOR: Plaintiffs Seek Prelim Approval of Class Settlement ----------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARC ISENBERG, JASON DELLISANTI, CARMEL MCCOLGAN, PATRICK STACK, PETER SCHUMAN, KEVIN LIM, STEVEN KOSOFF, HENDRICK MOY, ELNUR ALIYEV, BARBARA JOHNSON, TERRY STINSON, PATRICK KEELEY, BOB LOFTUS, NICHOLE FICK, MARK CHATWIN, GIOI NGUYEN, MITHUN TALREJA and RAJIB DAS on behalf of themselves and the Putative Class, v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, Case No. 2:22-cv-05673-MAH (D.N.J.), the Plaintiffs, on Aug. 3, 2026, shall move before the Honorable Michael A. Hammer, for an Order granting unopposed motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement. Toyota is the primary marketing, sales, and distribution arm for Toyota and Lexus in the United States. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=N6Zcic at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Bruce H. Nagel, Esq. Lisa R. Considine, Esq. NAGEL RICE, LLP 103 Eisenhower Parkway Roseland, NJ 07068 Telephone: (973) 618-0400 E-mail: bnagel@nagelrice.com lconsidine@nagelrice.com TRANS UNION: Christian Class Certification Bid Tossed ----------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as RICKY CHRISTIAN, et al., v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Case No. 2:22-cv-02253-JDW (E.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge Wolson entered an order as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is denied without prejudice as moot; and 2. The Parties' motion for preliminary approval of a class settlement is due on or before Aug. 14, 2026. Accordingly, the Parties reached an agreement in principle to resolve the matter on a class-wide basis, the Court says. TransUnion is an American consumer credit reporting agency. A copy of the Court's order dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=54jA11 at no extra charge.[CC] TRANSUNION LLC: McLeod Suit Transferred From C.D. Cal. to N.D. Ill. ------------------------------------------------------------------- The case DURANT MCLEOD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. TRANSUNION; TRANSUNION, LLC; SALESFORCE, INC.; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No. 2:25-cv-08553, was transferred from the United States District Court for the Central District of California to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on January 7, 2026. The Clerk of Court for the Northern District of Illinois assigned Case No. 1:25-cv-15376 to the proceeding. The suit is brought against the Defendants for their failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals stored within its network systems following a data breach in July 2025. TransUnion, LLC is a global credit reporting agency, with its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois. Salesforce, Inc. is a software company, headquartered in San Francisco, California. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Matthew J. Matern, Esq. Deanna S. Leifer, Esq. Kristen B. Doyan, Esq. MATERN LAW GROUP, PC 2101 E. El Segundo Blvd., Suite 403 El Segundo, CA 90245 Telephone: (310) 531-1900 Facsimile: (310) 531-1901 Email: mmatern@maternlawgroup.com dleifer@maternlawgroup.com kdoyan@maternlawgroup.com TRUSTAFF MANAGEMENT: Tarber Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages ------------------------------------------------------------------ KEELY TARBER and EVAN WOOTEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. TRUSTAFF MANAGEMENT, LLC, TRUSTAFF PERSONNEL SERVICES, LLC, TRUSTAFF TRAVEL NURSES, LLC and INGENOVIS TALENT OPERATIONS, LLC, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-00672-MWM (S.D. Ohio, July 10, 2026) seeks to recover from the Defendants overtime compensation for Plaintiffs and other similarly situated co-workers pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act. Defendant Trustaff regularly requires employees to work in excess of 40 hours per week. However, because Trustaff classifies Plaintiff and other employees as exempt, it fails to pay them any overtime compensation for these hours worked over 40 in a work week. The Plaintiffs seek to remedy violations of the wage and hour provisions of the FLSA by Defendant Trustaff that have deprived them and others similarly situated of their lawfully earned wages. The Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons who work or have worked for Defendant Trustaff as recruiters in the United States, on or after July, 2023, who elect to opt-in to this action. Trustaff Management, LLC is a healthcare staffing and recruitment agency specializing in travel nursing and allied health jobs.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Robert E. DeRose, Esq. BARKAN MEIZLISH DEROSE COX, LLP 4200 Regent Street, Suite 210 Columbus, OH 43219 Telephone: (614) 221 4221 Facsimile: (614) 744-2300 E-mail: bderose@barkanmeizlish.com - and - Gregg I. Shavitz, Esq. Camar R. Jones, Esq. SHAVITZ LAW GROUP, P.A. 622 Banyan Trail, Suite 200 Boca Raton, FL 33431 Telephone: (561) 447-8888 E-mail: gshavitz@shavitzlaw.com U.S. BANK: Hakimian Sues Over Unlawful Non-Disparagement Provision ------------------------------------------------------------------ ALEXANDER HAKIMIAN, Plaintiff v. U.S. BANK, N.A., and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants, Case No. 30-2026-01579749-CU-BT-CXC (C.D. Cal., June 17, 2026) is class action complaint in relation to the March 25, 2026 settlement agreement of the lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff in the Superior Court of California on May 12, 2025 for the Defendant's alleged violation of the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act. The Plaintiff requests that the Court declare the parties' rights and obligations, including that Defendant's non-disparagement provisions in settlement agreements are unlawful, void, and unenforceable and further requests injunctive relief barring Defendant from using settlement agreements in California that contain unlawful non-disparagement provisions. Hakimian is a resident of California, who acquired two U.S. Bank consumer credit cards. U.S. Bank is a national bank based in the state of Minnesota.[BN] Defendant U.S. Bank is represented by: Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. Macy Wilens, Esq. LAKESHORE LAW CENTER 18340 Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite 107-610 Yorba Linda, CA 92886 Telephone: (714) 854-7205 Facsimile: (714) 854-7206 Email: jeff@lakeshorelaw.org macy@lakeshorelaw.org ULTA SALON: Aids Meta to Intercept Electronic Data, Hartigan Says ----------------------------------------------------------------- RAEANON HARTIGAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC., Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-04007-JO-VET (S.D. Cal., July 12, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act, common law invasion of privacy, and intrusion upon seclusion. The case arises from the Defendant's practice of intercepting, recording, decoding, capturing, disclosing, and using the contents of the Plaintiff's and Class members' electronic communications from its website to Meta Platforms, Inc. According to the complaint, the Defendant installed tracking technologies on its website which allows Meta to access users' electronic communications without consent. As a result of the Defendant's conduct, the Plaintiff and Class members have suffered injury, including the violation of their statutorily protected privacy interests, the loss of the right to control the dissemination and use of the contents of their communications, and the loss of the value of their private information. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. is a company that offers cosmetics, skincare, haircare, fragrance, and other beauty products, with its principal place of business in Illinois. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. Spencer L. Pfeiff, Esq. SWIGART LAW GROUP, APC 2221 Camino del Rio S., Ste. 308 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (866) 219-3343 Email: Josh@SwigartLawGroup.com Spencer@SwigartLawGroup.com - and - Daniel G. Shay, Esq. SHAY LEGAL, APC 2221 Camino del Rio S., Ste. 308 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (619) 222-7429 Email: Dan@ShayLegal.com UNION PACIFIC: Appeals Class Cert. Order in Black Suit to 10th Cir. ------------------------------------------------------------------- UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY is taking an appeal from a court order in the lawsuit entitled Faye Black, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant, Case No. 6:23-cv-1218, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. Plaintiff Faye Black alleges that Union Pacific has caused trichloroethylene ("TCE") to contaminate her and the proposed class members' properties. On Sept. 30, 2025, the Plaintiffs filed a motion to certify class. On May 4, 2026, the Plaintiffs filed a motion to revise class area. On June 30, 2026, Judge Eric F. Melgren entered an Order granting the Plaintiffs' motion to certify class and motion to revise class area. The Plaintiffs' class definition is modified to exclude single-family home residential real properties that have existing vapor barriers. The Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is granted subject to the revision of the class area described in the motion and the Court's modification. William R. Griffin, Ryan D. Ellis, Christopher T. Nidel, Jonathan Nace, Ari Kresch, and Steven J. German are appointed as class counsel in this case. The appellate case is styled as Faye Black, et al. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Case No. 26-603, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, filed on July 14, 2026. [BN] Plaintiffs-Respondents FAYE BLACK, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, are represented by: William R. Griffin, Esq. Greg A. Drumright, Esq. Elizabeth M. Wilder, Esq. 645 E. Douglas, Suite 100 Wichita, KS 77202 Email: wrgriffin@martinpringle.com gadrumright@martinpringle.com emwilder@martinpringle.com - and - Christopher T. Nidel, Esq. Jonathan Nace, Esq. William W. Cowles, Esq. NIDEL & NACE, PLLC One Church Street, Suite 802 Rockville, MD 20850 Email: chris@nidellaw.com jon@nidellaw.com will@nidellaw.com - and - Ryan D. Ellis, Esq. THE LANIER LAW FIINI, PC 10940 W. Sam Houston Pkwy. N Houston, TX 77064 Email: Ryan.Ellis@lanierlawfitin.com - and - Ari Kresch, Esq. KRESCH LEGAL SERVICES PR, PLLC 1225 Avenida Ponce de Leon, Suite 605 San Juan, PR 00907 Email: akresch@l8001awfinn.com Defendant-Petitioner UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY is represented by: Steven J. Levine, Esq. J. Alan Harrell, Esq. PHELPS DUNBAR LLP 400 Convention Street I Ste. 1100 Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Telephone: (225) 346-0285 Facsimile: (225) 381-9197 Email: steve.levine@phelps.com alan.harrell@phelps.com - and - Sophie Gray, Esq. Patrick M. Judd, Esq. PHELPS DUNBAR LLP 365 Canal Street I Ste. 2000 New Orleans, LA 70130 Telephone: (504) 566-1311 Facsimile: (504) 568-9130 Email: sophie.gray@phelps.com patrick.judd@phelps.com - and - Robert Simpson, Esq. SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP 185 Asylum Street I Ste. 3701 Hartford, CT 06103 Telephone: (860) 515-8901 Facsimile: (860) 515-8911 Email: rrsimpson@shb.com UNITED EDUCATION: Campbell Sues Over Leaked Private Information --------------------------------------------------------------- Rasheen Campbell, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. United Education Institute d/b/a UEI College, Defendant, Case No. 8:26-cv-1560 (C.D. Cal., June 17, 2026) is a class action complaint arising from data security breach due to ransomware attack. On or around May 29, 2026, UEI experienced a ransomware attack, causing the exfiltration of Plaintiff's and Class Members' private information. On May 30, 2026, the notorious ransomware group Termite claimed responsibility for the data breach by posting a threat to release the private information on a ransomware leak site. According to the complaint, the Defendant failed to properly secure and safeguard the names, addresses, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, driver's licenses, and other sensitive data of the Plaintiff and other similarly situated UEI current and former students, applicants, and employees which compromised their personal information. Campbell is a student of UEI who suffered anxiety after the exposure of her private information to cybercriminals. United Education is an institution of higher education based in Irvine, California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: John J. Nelson, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 280 S. Beverly Drive, PH Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: (858) 209-6941 Email: jnelson@milberg.com - and - Tyler J. Bean, Esq. Tanner R. Hilton, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 101 Park Avenue Suite 1300, #16982799 Oklahoma City, OK 73102 Telephone: (212) 532-1091 Email: tbean@sirillp.com thilton@sirillp.com UNITED PARCEL: Seeks Leave to File Sur-Reply in Brown Lawsuit ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Timothy Brown, Ronnie Suveg, Joseph Bobertz, Stacey Richards, Warren Washburn, Nancy Youngermann, and John Braxton, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc., the Administrative Committee of the UPS Retirement Plan, and the Board of Trustees of the UPS Pension Plan, Case No. 1:22-cv-01672-SEG (N.D. Ga.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order to: (1) disregard arguments and evidence in the reply in support of the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification, and (2) grant the Defendants leave to file a sur-reply brief. As explained in the Defendants' accompanying Memorandum of Law, the Plaintiffs' new and unfounded assertions should be disregarded, and the Court should permit the Defendants' sur-reply in opposition to the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification to be filed. United Parcel is an American multinational shipping-and-receiving and supply chain management company. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=JIGd9k at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Emily S. Costin, Esq. David R. Godofsky, Esq. R. Blake Crohan, Esq. Michelle Jackson, Esq. ALSTON & BIRD LLP 950 F. Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004-1404 Telephone: (202) 239-3300 Facsimile: (202) 239-3333 E-mail: emily.costin@alston.com david.godofsky@alston.com Blake.crohan@alston.com Michelle.jackson@alston.com UNITED PARCEL: Seeks to Seal Exhibits in Brown Class Suit --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Timothy Brown, Ronnie Suveg, Joseph Bobertz, Stacey Richards, Warren Washburn, Nancy Youngermann, and John Braxton, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc., the Administrative Committee of the UPS Retirement Plan, and the Board of Trustees of the UPS Pension Plan, Case No. 1:22-cv-01672-SEG (N.D. Ga.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order granting their motion to seal Exhibits BB and CC to the Defendants' sur-reply in opposition to the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification. Because Exhibit BB and CC refer to documents or information that the Plaintiff Youngermann designated "Confidential," and in accordance with the Amended Protective Confidentiality Order, Paragraph 12 of Judge Batten's Instructions to Parties and Counsel, Paragraphs III(G) and IV(J) of this Court's Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation, and the Court's Standing Order 04-02, the Defendants have filed the deposition transcript excerpts cited as Exhibit BB and the document cited as Exhibit CC in the Sur-Reply provisionally under seal. United Parcel is an American multinational shipping-and-receiving and supply chain management company. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=z65Ch1 at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Emily S. Costin, Esq. David R. Godofsky, Esq. R. Blake Crohan, Esq. Michelle Jackson, Esq. ALSTON & BIRD LLP 950 F. Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004-1404 Telephone: (202) 239-3300 Facsimile: (202) 239-3333 E-mail: emily.costin@alston.com david.godofsky@alston.com Blake.crohan@alston.com Michelle.jackson@alston.com UNITED STATES: Appeals Denied Lift Administrative Stay to 1st Cir. ------------------------------------------------------------------ KRISTI L. NOEM, et al. are taking an appeal from a court order denying in part their motion to lift abeyance and lift administrative stay in the lawsuit entitled African Communities Together, et al., on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Secretary Kristi L. Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants, Case No. 1:26−cv−11201−ADB, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The suit is brought against the Defendant for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. On July 1, 2026, the Defendants filed a motion to lift abeyance and lift administrative stay, which Judge Allison D. Burroughs granted in part and denied in part on July 2, 2026. The stay of this action is lifted, but the administrative stay will remain in place until further notice to permit the Court to resolve the issues presented by the Plaintiffs' emergency motion. The appellate case is styled as African Communities Together, et al. v. Noem, et al., Case No. 26-1832, in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, filed on July 20, 2026. [BN] Plaintiffs-Respondents AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER, et al., on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated, are represented by: Abbey Rose Koenning Rutherford, Esq. Nargis Aslami, Esq. Melissa Shay Keaney, Esq. MUSLIM ADVOCATES 1032 15th Street N.W. #362 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 897−2622 (202) 897−1895 (279) 269−2362 Email: abbey@muslimadvocates.org nargis@muslimadvocates.org melissa@muslimadvocates.org - and - Collin Poirot, Esq. 1032 15th St. NW, #362 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 897−2564 Email: collin@muslimadvocates.org - and - Erik Matthew Crew, Esq. HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE 4560 Alvarado Canyon Rd., Ste. H San Diego, CA 92120 Telephone: (949) 603−7411 Email: ecrew@haitianbridge.org - and - Sadaf Hasan, Esq. MUSLIM ADVOCATES P.O. Box 34440 Washington, DC 20043 Telephone: (347) 249−9013 Email: sadaf@muslimadvocates.org - and - Ashley Michelle Burrell, Esq. Lauren Carbajal, Esq. THE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 40 Rector Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10006 Telephone: (212) 965−2200 (646) 916−9846 Email: aburrell@naacpldf.org lcarbajal@naacpldf.org - and - Ayomide Odunsi, Esq. Kacey Ann Mordecai, Esq. 700 14th Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 682−1300 Email: modunsi@naacpldf.org kmordecai@naacpldf.org Defendants-Petitioners KRISTI L. NOEM, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al. are represented by: Robert E. Richardson, Esq. United States Attorney's Office MA 1 Courthouse Way, Suite 9200 Boston, MA 02210 Telephone: (617) 748−3247 Facsimile: (617) 748−3951 Email: robert.richardson@usdoj.gov - and - Tasha J. Bahal, Esq. One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Telephone: (617) 963−2066 Email: tasha.bahal@mass.gov - and - Matthew P. Horvitz, Esq. Nathaniel R. B. Koslof, Esq. GOULSTON & STORRS PC One Post Office Square Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 482−1776 Facsimile: (617) 574−4112 Email: mhorvitz@goulstonstorrs.com UNITED STATES: Appeals Injunction and Class Cert. Order in Coe Suit ------------------------------------------------------------------- TODD BLANCHE, et al. are taking an appeal from a court order granting the Plaintiffs' proposed order to show cause for a temporary restraining order and provisional class certification in the lawsuit entitled Carter Coe, by and through his parent and next friend Caroline Coe, et al., on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Todd Blanche, Acting United States Attorney General, in his official capacity, et al., Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-4641, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The suit is brought against the Defendants for alleged civil rights violations. On June 2, 2026, the Plaintiffs filed a proposed order to show cause for a temporary restraining order and a motion for provisional class certification, which Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted on June 24, 2026. The Court ruled that the Plaintiffs sufficiently provisionally demonstrated that the proposed Class and New York University (NYU) Subclass adhere to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and such classes are hereby provisionally certified. Department of Justice (DOJ) Defendants, their officers, agents, successors, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other persons who are in active concert or participation with them, are restrained and enjoined from: seeking, receiving, using, retaining, or disseminating any identifying or sensitive health information of the Plaintiffs and members of the Class through the subpoenas at issue or substantially similar administrative or grand jury subpoenas as part of the U.S Department of Justices claimed investigations into health care offenses related to gender-affirming medical care. NYU Defendants, their officers, agents, successors, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other persons who are in active concert or participation with them, are restrained and enjoined from: disclosing or producing any identifying or sensitive health information of the Plaintiffs and members of the NYU Subclass to the DOJ Defendants in response to the subpoena at issue or any substantially similar administrative or grand jury subpoenas as part of the U.S. Department of Justices claimed investigations into healthcare offenses related to gender-affirming medical care. The security requirement is hereby waived because the Defendants will not suffer any costs from the preliminary injunction, the Plaintiffs are suing the government to vindicate constitutional rights, and imposing a security requirement would pose a hardship for the Plaintiffs. On July 6, 2026, the Court finds there is good cause to grant the preliminary injunction and extend provisional class certification. The appellate case is styled as Coe v. Blanche, Case No. 26-1886, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed on July 13, 2026. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellees CARTER COE, by and through his parent and next friend Caroline Coe, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, are represented by: Gabriella Larios, Esq. NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 125 Broad Street, 19th Floor New York, NY 10004 - and - Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, Esq. LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC. 120 Wall Street, 19th Floor New York, NY 10005 - and - Chase Strangio, Esq. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 Defendants-Appellants TODD BLANCHE, Acting United States Attorney General, in his official capacity, et al. are represented by: Benjamin H. Torrance, Esq. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, NY 10007 UNITED STATES: Calandrella Appeals Court Order to Federal Circuit ----------------------------------------------------------------- STEPHEN G. CALANDRELLA, et al. are taking an appeal from a court order in the lawsuit entitled Stephen G. Calandrella, et al., individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. United States, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-01552-RAH, in the United States Court of Federal Claims. The nature of suit is stated as 516 Miscellaneous - Damages. The appellate case is styled as Calandrella v. US, Case No. 26-2046, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, filed on July 20, 2026. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellants STEPHEN G. CALANDRELLA, et al., individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, are represented by: William E. Copley, Esq. DENTONS US LLP 1301 K Street, NW East Tower Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-9217 Defendant-Appellee UNITED STATES is represented by: Matthew Jude Carhart, Esq. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE P.O. Box 480 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Telephone: (202) 307-0313 UNITED STATES: Komatsu Bid to Intervene Nixed --------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as FR. FABIAN ARIAS, STEPHEN KELLY, LAURA MCCALLUM, DEBBIE NATHAN, DR. ZOEY PHILLIPS, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; DAVID J. VENTURELLA, in his official capacity as the senior official performing the duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-02130-CM (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge McMahon entered an order denying Intervenor Towaki Komatsu's motion for leave to file motion to intervene. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket Number 78. Mr. Komatsu has not identified the interest required by Rule 24( a)(2). Mr. Komatsu's proposed grounds for intervention concern alleged misconduct by federal courthouse security officers and the United States Marshals Service dating back to 2018, as well as his disagreement with a filing-restriction order entered by Judge Valerie E. Caproni in Butler v. City of New York, No. 15-cv-3783 (VEC). Those subjects are collateral to claims at issue in this action. They do not give Mr. Komatsu a direct, substantial, and legally protectable interest in this litigation, the Court contends. Nor will disposition of this action impair or impede Mr. Komatsu's ability to protect any interest he may have. This Court will not adjudicate the legality of the conduct allegedly directed at Mr. Komatsu by courthouse security officers or the United States Marshals Service, and its rulings will not determine the validity or application of the filing restrictions imposed in Butler. Mr. Komatsu therefore has no right to intervene under Rule 24(a)(2), the Court adds. The Defendants include U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; MARK.WAYNE MULLIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; TODD BLANCHE, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General; GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION; and EDWARD FORST, in his official capacity as Administrator of General Services. US Immigration conducts criminal investigations, enforces immigration laws, preserves national security, and protects public safety. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=DsnRy7 at no extra charge.[CC] UNITED STATES: L.N.P. Cross Appeals Court Judgment to 4th Circuit ----------------------------------------------------------------- L.N.P. is filing a cross appeal in the lawsuit entitled L.N.P., on his own behalf and on behalf of his dependent children P.D.P. and L.D.P., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Frank Bisignano, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, et al., Defendants, Case No. 1:24-cv-01196-MSN-IDD, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The nature of suit is stated as 865 Social Security - Retirement, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (RSI). On Jan. 14, 2026, the Plaintiff filed a motion to enter final judgment. On Feb. 9, 2026, the Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to stay execution of unfavorable judgment pending appeal. On Apr. 27, 2026, Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff entered an Order granting in part and denying in part the Plaintiff's motion to enter final judgment and granting in part and denying in part the Defendants' motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to stay execution of unfavorable judgment pending appeal. Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendants. On June 25, 2026, the Defendants appealed the Court's judgment. The appellate case is styled as L.N.P. v. Frank Bisignano, Case No. 26-1883, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, filed on July 13, 2026. [BN] Plaintiff-Appellant L.N.P., on his own behalf and on behalf of his dependent children P.D.P. and L.D.P., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, is represented by: Ira Thane Kasdan, Esq. KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 670 Maine Avenue SW Washington, DC 20024 Telephone: (202) 342-8849 (202) 342-8864 - and - Steven W. Schlesinger, Esq. Damon William Suden, Esq. KELLEY DRYE & WARREN, LLP 3 World Trade Center 175 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 Telephone: (212) 808-7740 Defendants-Appellees FRANK BISIGNANO, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, et al. are represented by: Derek Lawrence Weiss, Esq. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 Telephone: (202) 616-5365 V.F. CORPORATION: Brooks Suit Removed to W.D. Washington -------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Timothy Brooks, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated v. V.F. CORPORATION and VF OUTDOOR, LLC, doing business as: VANS, Case No. 26-2-18862-9 SEA was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington for the County of King, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02440. In the Complaint, Plaintiff seeks relief from Defendants, individually and on behalf of similarly-situated Washington residents, pursuant to the Washington Commercial Electronic Mail Act, codified at chapter 190 of title 19 of the Revised Code of Washington (or "RCW"), specifically, Wash. Rev. Code § 19.190.020 et seq. (hereafter, the "CEMA") in Count I; and the Washington Consumer Protection Act, codified at chapter 86 of title 19 of the RCW. In particular, Plaintiff's Complaint and the attachments thereto allege, inter alia, that Plaintiff received at least 5 supposedly false or misleading emails about "limited time" sales in purported violation of the CEMA and the CPA between March 2023 and September 2024.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Rossi F. Maddalena, Esq. MERRICK, HOFSTEDT & LINDSEY, P.S. 3101 Western Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98121 Phone: (206) 682-0610 Email: rmaddalena@mhlseattle.com - and - Philip R. Meade, Esq. 3101 Western Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98121 Phone: (206) 682-0610 Email: pmeade@mhlseattle.com VAN LAURENCE BARKER: Cervantez-Tkac Class Action Stayed ------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as CRYSTAL CERVANTEZ-TKAC, et al., v. VAN LAURENCE BARKER, et al., Case No. 3:26-cv-00280-CHB (W.D. Ky.), the Hon. Judge Boom entered an order as follows: 1. This matter is stayed pending further order of the Court. 2. All pending motions are administratively remanded. 3. Counsel for the Plaintiffs shall file a copy of this Order with the Eastern District of New York, Summitbridge Wealth Mgmt., LLC v. Lighthouse Estates, LLC, No. 2:26-cv-00141 (JMA) (ST)), on or before July 14, 2026. 4. On or before Jan. 11, 2027, and for every six months thereafter, the plaintiffs shall file a status report with the Court advising of the status of the Summitbridge matter. The decision to impose a stay, rather than dismiss or transfer this action, resolves Plaintiffs' personal jurisdiction concerns, the Court says. As for the other available remedies, dismissal without prejudice is generally disfavored (and may be inappropriate given the Plaintiffs' jurisdictional concerns), and allowing both cases to proceed without interruption "is not prudent because there are motions pending in both courts and there is a risk that the two courts may rule inconsistently," the Court adds. The Plaintiffs allege that they fell victim to "a Ponzi scheme operated through Lighthouse [Estates LLC] and affiliated entities." Specifically, the Plaintiffs allege that the case involves "an elaborate scheme through which Defendant Van Laurence Barker, together with his family members, business associates, and affiliated entities, solicited at least $26 million from more than 125 private money lenders across the United States to fund purported real estate investments." A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Idm2o2 at no extra charge.[CC] VBIT TECHNOLOGIES: Summary Judgment Filing Extended in Pelham ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as PARKER PELHAM, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, v. VBIT TECHNOLOGIES CORP., CLASS ACTION VBIT MINING LLC, VBIT DC CORP., ADVANCED MINING GROUP, DANH CONG VO A/K/A DON VO, PHUONG D VO A/K/A KATIE VO, SEAN TU, JIN GAO AND LILLIAN ZHAO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00162-JLH-SRF (D. Del.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order that: 1. The July 31, 2026, deadline to file summary judgment motions is extended to 30 days following the Court's order on the Dettmering Motion; and 2. The July 31, 2026, deadline to file motions for class certification is extended to 30 days following the Court's order on the Dettmering Motion. Good cause exists for this extension as a matter of judicial economy, efficiency, and to avoid conflicting rulings because the Court's resolution of the Dettmering Motion is very likely to resolve issues of fact and/or of law that are material to (or perhaps even dispositive of) Mr. Gao's motion for summary judgment in this case including whether (i) the VBit mining packages are or are not "securities", and (ii) there are any facts to support claims against Mr. Gao individually regarding any fraud, securities or otherwise, the suit asserts. VBit sells bitcoin mining hardware and offers mining equipment hosting. A copy of the Parties' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=sAIj6B at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Brian E. Farnan, Esq. Michael J. Farnan, Esq. FARNAN LLP 919 North Market Street, 12th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 777-0300 E-mail: bfarnan@farnanlaw.com mfarnan@farnanlaw.com The Defendants are represented by: Joanna J. Cline, Esq. Emily L. Wheatley, Esq. TROUTMAN PEPPER LOCKE LLP Hercules Plaza, Suite 1000 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 777-6500 E-mail: joanna.cline@troutman.com emily.wheatley@troutman.com VR NW HOLDINGS: Cortez Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Ana Cortez and John Townsdin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. VR NW HOLDINGS, INC. and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Case No. 26-2-16673-1 SEA was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington for the County of King, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02417. The Plaintiffs assert multiple class claims arising under Washington wage-and-hour and employment statutes. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant failed to provide compliant meal and rest periods and failed to compensate employees for missed, late, interrupted, or otherwise noncompliant meal and rest periods. The Plaintiffs further allege that Defendant failed to pay all minimum wages and overtime wages allegedly due because of uncompensated meal periods, rest periods, off-the-clock work, training time, waiting time, and unreimbursed business expenses. The Plaintiffs assert claims for: Failure to Compensate for Noncompliant Meal and Rest Periods under RCW 49.12 and WAC 296-126 092; Failure to Pay Minimum Wages under RCW 49.46; Failure to Pay Overtime Wages under RCW 49.46; Unlawful Outside Employment Restriction under RCW 49.62.070; and Unlawful Noncompetition Covenant under RCW 49.62.020.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brandon Brouillette, Esq. CROSNER LEGAL, P.C. 92 Lenora Street, #179 Seattle, WA 98121 Phone: (866) 276-7637 Facsimile: (310) 510-6429 Email: bbrouillette@crosnerlegal.com The Defendants are represented by: Matthew J. Macario, Esq. Kylene Slocum, Esq. FISHER PHILLIPS LLP 1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 682-2308 Email: mmacario@fisherphillips.com kslocum@fisherphillips.com WAL-MART ASSOCIATES: Casillas Suit Removed to C.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Rosario Casillas, individually, and on behalf of other employees similarly situated v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corporation; WALMART INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. 26STCV15775 was removed from the Superior Court of California, Sutter County, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on July 9, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-07439. The Complaint brings the following two claims: Violation of Fair Labor Standards Act (Unpaid Overtime); and Violation of Fair Labor Standards Act (Unpaid Minimum Wages).[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Paloma P. Peracchio, Esq. Melis Atalay, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: 213-239-9800 Facsimile: 213-239-9045 Email: paloma.peracchio@ogletree.com melis.atalay@ogletree.com - and - Mitchell A. Wrosch, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Park Tower, Fifteenth Floor 695 Town Center Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714-800-7900 Facsimile: 714-754-1298 Email: mitchell.wrosch@ogletree.com WALGREEN CO: Tichenor Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ----------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Alexandria L. Tichenor and Julie Radke, each individually, and each on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated v. WALGREEN CO., an Illinois corporation; and DOES 1 through 5, inclusive, Case No. 26-2-18071-7 SEA was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington for the County of King, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02426. The Plaintiffs' Third Cause of Action alleges that Walgreens violated RCW 49.12.020 and WAC 296-126-092 by allegedly failing to provide Plaintiffs and the Putative Class Members with rest breaks owed under Washington law. The Plaintiffs' Fourth Cause of Action alleges that Walgreens violated RCW 49.12.020 and WAC 296-126-092 by allegedly failing to provide Plaintiffs and the Putative Class Members with meal breaks owed under Washington law.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joanna Ghosh, Esq. Albert H. Kirby, Esq. LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE, P.C. 701 Pike Street, Suite 1650 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (424) 521-5121 Fax: (818) 265-1021 Email: joanna@calljustice.com a.kirby@calljustice.com The Defendants are represented by: Adam S. Belzberg, Esq. STOEL RIVES LLP 600 University Street, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206.624.0900 Facsimile: 206.386.7500 Email: adam.belzberg@stoel.com - and - Emily L. Seibold, Esq. 600 University Street, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206.624.0900 Facsimile: 206.386.7500 Email: emily.seibold@stoel.com - and - Ryan S. Kunkel, Esq. 760 SW Ninth Avenue, Suite 300 Portland, OR 97205 Phone: 503.224.3380 Facsimile: 503.220.2480 Email: ryan.kunkel@stoel.com WALMART INC: Removes Basile Suit to N.D. Ill. --------------------------------------------- The Defendant in the case of DAVID BASILE, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WALMART, INC., D/B/A SPARK, Defendant, filed a notice to remove the lawsuit from the Circuit Court of the State of Illinois, County of Cook (Case No. 2026CH05726) to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on July 17, 2026. The Clerk of Court for the Northern District of Illinois assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-08527 to the proceeding. Walmart Inc. operates discount stores, supercenters, and neighborhood markets. The Company offers merchandise such as apparel, house wares, small appliances, electronics, musical instruments, books, home improvement, shoes, jewelry, toddler, games, household essentials, pets, pharmaceutical products, party supplies, and automotive. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Randall W. Edwards, Esq. O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2 Embarcadero Ctr., Suite 2800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Email: redwards@omm.com - and - Scott Voelz, Esq. Paul A. Holton, Esq. O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 Email: svoelz@omm.com pholton@omm.com - and - Benjamin E. Waldin, Esq. Collin Vierra, Esq. EIMER STAHL LLP 224 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 1100 Chicago, IL 60604 Telephone: (312) 660-7600 Email: bwaldin@eimerstahl.com cvierra@eimerstahl.com WASTE MANAGEMENT: Chavarin Suit Removed to C.D. California ---------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Alvaro Chavarin, Rodrigo Bermudez, Isidro Valdivia, and Ismael Rodriguez, on behalf of themselves individually and all others similarly situated v. WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.; USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYCLING AND DISPOSAL SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT COLLECTION AND RECYCLING, INC.; and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No. CVRI2304962 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 5:26-cv-03817. The Plaintiffs plead nine causes of action, all styled as state law claims involving violations of wage and hour provisions of the California Labor Code and Unfair Competition Law ("UCL"). The Complaint contains nine causes of action, alleging: Failure to Provide First Meal Periods Within the First Five Hours of Work; Failure to Provide Second Meal Periods for Workdays Over Ten Hours; Rest Break Violations; Failure to Pay Double Time; Failure to Furnish Accurate Itemized Wage Statements; Failure to Maintain Required Payroll Records; Unlawful Wage Deductions; Failure to Indemnify for Necessary Business Expenses; and Violation of Cal. Business & Professions Code Sections 17200.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Khatereh Sage Fahimi, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 Phone: 619.232.0441 Fax: 619.232.4302 Email: sfahimi@littler.com WATSON CLINIC: Discloses Personal Info to 3rd Parties, B.D. Says ---------------------------------------------------------------- B.D., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WATSON CLINIC ASC, LLP, Defendant, Case No. 8:26-cv-01977 (M.D. Fla., July 10, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of the Florida Security of Communications Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, breach of confidence, invasion of privacy, unjust enrichment, and breach of implied contract. The case arises from the Defendant's practice of disclosing the personally identifiable information and protected health information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated patients to third parties, including Google, Inc. According to the complaint, the Defendant installed tracking technologies on its website, www.watsonclinic.com, which allows third parties to access confidential information without consent. As a result, the private information of the Plaintiff and Class members was compromised through access by and disclosure to unauthorized third parties. Watson Clinic ASC, LLP is a healthcare provider based in Florida. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mariya Weekes, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 333 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 2000 Miami, FL, 33131 Telephone: (786) 206-9057 Facsimile: (786) 879-7520 Email: mweekes@milberg.com WELLS FARGO: Plaintiff Seeks Clarification of Class Cert Order -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned Re Wells Fargo Cash Sweep Litigation, Case No. 3:24-cv-04616-VC (N.D. Cal.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order granting their motion for leave to file Plaintiffs' proposed motion for reconsideration and/or clarification of the Order pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9. The Plaintiffs submit that the IRA Promise—which applies to all IRA accountholders, including those with advisory accounts—is the type of discrete, overlooked material fact that Rule 7-9(b)(3) contemplates. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs seek leave to move to reconsider or clarify this narrow aspect of the Court's Order. To the extent the Defendant continues to seek to present any extrinsic evidence regarding the IRA Promise, the Plaintiffs request that the Court clarify that such evidence would only be relevant to the proper interpretation of the standard form contract. The Plaintiffs' proposed motion for reconsideration requests that the Court reconsider its denial of certification, with prejudice, only as to the Advisory Subclass IRA accountholders and clarify that the denial of certification was solely with regard to those accountholders' participation in the proposed Advisory Subclass, and does not prevent them from being included as members of the proposed IRA Subclass in the Plaintiffs' forthcoming renewed motion for class certification. To the extent Defendant contends that it may offer extrinsic evidence regarding the IRA Promise as to the advisory IRA accountholders, or that its previously offered extrinsic evidence applies to those accountholders, the Plaintiffs request that the Court clarify that any such evidence is either irrelevant given the unambiguous IRA Promise, or relevant only to the common question of the proper interpretation of the standard form contract. Wells Fargo is an American multinational financial services company. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=XMpnMw at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Salvatore J. Graziano, Esq. John Rizio-Hamilton, Esq. Adam H. Wierzbowski, Esq. Michael Blatchley, Esq. Emily A. Tu, Esq. Jonathan D. Uslaner, Esq. BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 554-1400 E-mail: salvatore@blbglaw.com johnr@blbglaw.com adam@blbglaw.com michaelb@blbglaw.com emily.tu@blbglaw.com jonathanu@blbglaw.com - and - Joshua P. Davis, Esq. Kyla J. Gibboney, Esq. Michael Dell'Angelo, Esq. Andrew D. Abramowitz, Esq. Jacob M. Polakoff, Esq. Alex B. Heller, Esq. Joseph E. Samuel, Jr., Esq. BERGER MONTAGUE PC 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 625 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (800) 424-6690 E-mail: jdavis@bm.net kgibboney@bm.net mdellangelo@bm.net aabramowitz@bm.net jpolakoff@bm.net aheller@bm.net jsamuel@bergermontague.com - and - Deborah Rosenthal, Esq. Sona R. Shah, Esq. Thomas I. Sheridan, III, Esq. SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLP 455 Market St., Ste. 1270 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 536-3986 E-mail: drosenthal@simmonsfirm.com sshah@simmonsfirm.com tsheridan@simmonsfirm.com WELLS FARGO: Private ADR Process in Morris Extended to Nov. 19 -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ANTHONY MORRIS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., Case No. 4:23-cv-03277-HSG (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. entered an order that the deadline for the parties to participate in the private ADR process is extended to Nov. 19, 2026. On March 23, 2026, the Court granted the parties' joint stipulation to reschedule the hearing on the motion for class certification and the motion to exclude expert testimony to May 28, 2026. On May 28, 2026, the Court held the hearing on the motion for class certification and the motion to exclude expert testimony, and a ruling is pending. Wells Fargo is a major American multinational financial services company. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=tHzVBA at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Stuart A. Davidson, Esq. Facundo Scialpi, Esq. ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 288-4545 E-mail: shawnw@rgrdlaw.com – and sdavidson@rgrdlaw.com fscialpi@rgrdlaw.com - and - Sean Baldwin, Esq. Drake Reed, Esq. SELENDY GAY PLLC 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10104 Telephone: (212) 390-9000 E-mail: sbaldwin@selendygay.com dreed@selendygay.com The Defendants are represented by: Amanda L. Groves, Esq. Kobi K. Brinson, Esq. Stacie C. Knight, Esq. WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 333 S. Grand Avenue, 38th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 615-1700 Facsimile: (213) 615-1750 E-mail: amanda.groves@winstontaylor.com kobi.brinson@winstontaylor.com stacie.knight@winstontaylor.com - and - William Greg Fox, Jr., Esq. WINSTON TAYLOR 2121 N. Pearl Street, Suite 900 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 453-6500 E-mail: william.fox@winstontaylor.com WEST POINT PHYSICAL THERAPY: Rico Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against West Point Physical Therapy Center, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Erika Rico, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals v. West Point Physical Therapy Center Inc., Does 1-100, Case No. 26STCV22077 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., July 14, 2026). West Point Medical Center -- https://www.westpointpt.com/ -- offers onsite physical therapy since 2005.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Margaret-Crystal Zeytounian, Esq. AKHAVAN & ASSOCIATES 15760 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1720 Encino, CA 91436 Phone: (855) 463-4733 Email: Maggie@baalaw.com WEX INC: Conditional Class Cert Bid in Darby Due Dec. 11 -------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as PAMELA DARBY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. WEX INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-00147-SDN (D. Me.), the Hon. Judge Wolf entered an order on joint objection to scheduling order: Thus, the parties shall follow the two-step approach to FLSA collective actions. The parties' stipulations are accepted, and the case is assigned to the complex track. The first stage of discovery shall be completed by Nov. 13, 2026. Consistent with Belanger, this stage of discovery is limited to information relevant to conditionally certifying the collective action, which may include documents like job descriptions, payroll records or summaries showing common practices among the potential collective, and documents concerning corporate structure. Any motion by Plaintiff for notice and conditional class certification under 28 U.S.C. section 216(b) must be filed no later than Dec. 11, 2026. The Defendant's response is due Jan. 8, 2027. The Plaintiff's reply is due by Jan. 22, 2027. All other deadlines are held in abeyance and to be set after the Court rules on the Plaintiff's motion for court-authorized notice. In Belanger v. Ocean State Jobbers Inc., the Court granted a joint objection to the scheduling order, which proposed that first-stage discovery "shall solely consist of discovery related to whether the case shall proceed to notice and proceed as a conditionally certified collective action." The same procedure applies here. In her complaint, Pamela Darby alleges that WEX, Inc., violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and related state laws by failing to properly compensate for all hours worked and to pay the overtime premium for all hours worked in excess of forty per workweek. WEX is a provider of payment processing and information management services to the United States commercial and government vehicle fleet industry. A copy of the Court's order dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Q4AHsE at no extra charge.[CC] WFG NATIONAL: Miles Seeks FLSA Conditional Collective Certification ------------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Jada Miles, an Arizona resident; v. WFG National Title Insurance Company, a Foreign Insurer-for-Profit; Case No. 2:26-cv-03484-SHD (D. Ariz.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order conditionally certifying a collective action pursuant to Section 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") consisting of: "All employees who work[ed] for the Defendant WFG National Title Insurance Company and/or a related entity; within the last three years; who work[ed] over 40 hours in any given workweek as a past or present escrow assistant or escrow officer (or similar job title and/or similar job duties and responsibilities)." These employees were not paid overtime at the correct overtime rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a given workweek, were misclassified as exempt, and/or worked off the clock hours that they did not receive overtime compensation for are known as (the "Collective Members"). The Plaintiff seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages for herself and the Collective Members, requiring the proper payment of overtime wages to employees, under the collective action mechanism of the FLSA. At this preliminary stage, the Plaintiff has come forward with sufficient factual bases from which this Court can determine that similarly situated plaintiffs exist, the suit asserts. The Plaintiff Miles worked for Defendants full-time from June 23, 2024, to May 5, 2025. WFG offers property and casualty insurance products. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Et8Rf0 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: James Weiler, Esq. WEILER LAW PLLC 5050 N. 40th St., Suite 260 Phoenix, AZ 85018 Telephone: (480) 442-3410 E-mail: jweiler@weilerlaw.com WHAT IF HOLDINGS: Class Cert Bid Filing Extended ------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Starling v. What if Holdings LLC, Case No. 3:26-cv-01039 (N.D. Tex., Filed April 2, 2026), the Hon. Judge Jane J. Boyle entered an order granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Class Certification. The deadline to file a motion for class certification shall coincide with the deadline for filing dispositive motions to be set at a later time. The suit alleges violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). What If Holdings is a performance marketing and advertising agency[.CC] WHOLE FOODS MARKET: Shorley Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Whole Foods Market California, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Ana Shorley, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Whole Foods Market California, Inc., Whole Foods Market, Inc., Mrs. Gooch's Natural Food Markets, Inc., Does 1 through 50, Case No. 26STCV21913 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., July 13, 2026). Whole Foods Market, Inc. -- https://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/ -- is an American multinational supermarket chain headquartered in Austin, Texas.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Shalini Dogra, Esq. DOGRA LAW GROUP PC 2219 Main Street, Unit 239 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Phone: (747) 234-6673 Fax: (310) 868-0170 Email: shalini@dogralawgroup.com WILMER CUTLER: Perry Sues Over Unauthorized Access of Clients' Info ------------------------------------------------------------------- JASON PERRY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-02470-EGS (D.D.C., July 14, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for negligence, breach of implied contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The case arises from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals stored within its network systems following a data breach discovered on May 8, 2026. The Defendant also failed to timely notify the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals about the data breach. As a result, the private information of the Plaintiff and Class members was compromised and damaged through access by and disclosure to unknown and unauthorized third parties, says the suit. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP is an international law firm, with its principal place of business in Washington, DC. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: David Hilton Wise, Esq. WISE LAW FIRM, PLC 10640 Page Avenue, Suite 320 Fairfax, VA 22030 Telephone: (703) 934-6377 Facsimile: (703) 934-6379 Email: dwise@wiselaw.pro - and - Laura Grace Van Note, Esq. Mark T. Freeman, Esq. COLE & VAN NOTE 555 12th Street, Suite 2100 Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 891-9800 Email: lvn@colevannote.com mtf@colevannote.com WILSON ELECTRIC: Seeks to File Supplement to Decertify Class ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Daniel Andrews and Matthew Baker as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Wilson Electric Services Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, v. Wilson Electric Services Corp.; the Wilson Electric Services Corp. Plan Committee; Todd Klimas; Wesley McClure; Terry Oakes; Scott Smith; Jeri Kendle; and Rick Tometich, Case No. 2:24-cv-00995-DJH (D. Ariz.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order granting them leave to file supplement in further support of their motion to decertify to account for two crucial developments since the motion to decertify was filed in October 2025. Wilson provides electrical contracting services. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated July 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=UolQSN at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Lars C. Golumbic, Esq. Andrew D. Salek-Raham, Esq. Lawrence A. Brett, Esq. GROOM LAW GROUP, CHARTERED 1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 857-0620 Facsimile: (202) 659-4503 E-mail: lgolumbic@groom.com asalek-raham@groom.com lbrett@groom.com WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE: Myler Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ----------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Michael Myler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC. d/b/a WOLVERINE, Case No. 26-2-09161-2 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Pierce, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-05766. The Complaint arises out of Plaintiff's allegations that Defendant sent marketing emails to Washington residents with subject lines that were "false, misleading, and unlawful because they promoted discounts under false time restrictions."[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: M. Anderson Berry, Esq. Brook E. Garberding, Esq. EMERY REDDY, P.C. 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (916) 823-6955 Email: Anderson@emeryreddy.com Brook@emeryreddy.com gregory@emeryreddy.com brandon@emeryreddy.com - and - Samuel J. Strauss, Esq. Raina C. Borrelli, Esq. STRAUSS & BORRELLI PLLC 980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: (872) 263-1100 Fax: (872) 263-1109 Email: sam@straussborrelli.com raina@straussborrelli.com - and - Alexander E. Wolf, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 280 S. Beverly Drive, PH Beverly Hills, CA 09212 Phone: (872) 365-7060 Email: awolf@milberg.com The Defendants are represented by: Andrew R. Escobar, Esq. Wendy M. Feng, Esq. Gabrielle K. Lindquist, Esq. SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 999 Third Avenue, Suite 4700 Seattle, WA 98104-4041 Phone: (206) 946-4910 Email: aescobar@seyfarth.com wfeng@seyfarth.com glindquist@seyfarth.com WORKDAY INC: Class Certification Bid in Mobley Due Sept. 14 ----------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as DEREK L. MOBLEY, et al., v. WORKDAY, INC., Case No. 3:23-cv-00770-RFL (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Lin entered an order granting the Plaintiffs' motion to change time. The following case deadlines are set: Class certification motion: Sept. 14, 2026 Last day to depose expert(s) disclosed Oct. 5, 2026 with class certification motion: Opposition to class certification Nov. 10, 2026 motion, motion to decertify: Last day to depose expert(s) disclosed Nov. 30, 2026 with class certification opposition and motion to decertify: Reply to class certification motion: Dec. 8, 2026 Opposition to motion to decertify: Jan. 6, 2027 Class certification hearing: March 9, 2027 In light of the potential need for additional discovery, resolution of related discovery disputes, and modification of expert reports, the Plaintiffs have shown good cause for the requested extension, the Court says. With respect to the briefing schedule, the Plaintiffs fairly identify an asymmetry in the timing of the briefing, particularly in light of the potential need to depose additional expert(s) for the decertification motion. The requested adjustment is appropriate, the Court adds. Workday is an American on‑demand (cloud-based) financial management, human capital management, and student information system software vendor. A copy of the Court's order dated July 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Ar1a1s at no extra charge.[CC] YALDA AR LLC: Muoka Sues Over Failure to Pay for Wages ------------------------------------------------------ Chelsea Muoka, individually and on behalf others similarly situated v. YALDA AR LLC, ASHKON FAMILI, FARHON KHERAJ, and DALIA ZARRINHONAR, Case No. 1:26-cv-03901-SEG (N.D. Ga., July 13, 2026), is brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") as a result of the Defendants' failure to pay for minimum and overtime wages. This is a collective action for complaint damages and other relief brough by Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, pursuant to the FLSA, as a result of Defendants: improperly claiming a tip credit against their obligation to pay at least the statutory minimum wage; failure to pay at least the federal minimum wage; unlawful retention of Plaintiff's tips; failure to pay overtime wages; violation of the U.S. Department of Labor's Dual-Jobs Regulation (a/k/a the "80/20 Rule" governing when an employer must pay a tipped employee the full minimum wage for performing "side work"); and compensatory damages for unlawful retaliation and for liquidated damages for willful violations of the FLSA, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was formerly employed by Defendants as a server. Yalda operates two Persian and Middle Eastern restaurants, one in Sandy Springs, Georgia and one in west midtown Atlanta, Georgia.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Dean R. Fuchs, Esq. Andrea L. Pawlak, Esq. SCHULTEN WARD TURNER & WEISS, LLP 260 Peachtree Street, NW, Suite 2700 Atlanta, GA 30303 Phone: (404) 688-6800 Email: d.fuchs@swtwlaw.com a.pawlak@swtwlaw.com YH HOME BUYERS: Melingonis Files TCPA Suit in S.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against YH Home Buyers, LLC. The case is styled as Christopher Melingonis, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. YH Home Buyers, LLC, Case No. 3:26-cv-04012-GPC-DEB (S.D. Cal., July 13, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. YH Home Buyers, LLC -- https://www.yhhomebuyer.com/ -- is a limited liability company that appears in public property and real estate records.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joshua Brandon Swigart, Esq. Kevin Lemieux, Esq. SWIGART LAW GROUP, APC 2221 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 308 San Diego, CA 92108 Phone: (866) 219-3343 Fax: (866) 219-8344 Email: josh@swigartlawgroup.com kevin@lawyerkevin.com YOSEMITE FOODS INC: Mendez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Yosemite Foods Inc. The case is styled as Ramiro Mendez, an individual, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated v. Yosemite Foods Inc., Case No. STK-CV-UOE-2026-0008460 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., July 9, 2026). The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment." Yosemite Foods Inc. -- https://yosemitefoods.com/ -- is a custom processor of fresh, safe, high-quality pork products and is a distributor of beef, poultry, and other specialty meats.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Victoria Bree Rivapalacio, Esq. BLUMENTHAL NORDREHAUG BHOWMIK DE BLOUW 2255 Calle Clara La Jolla, CA 92037-3107 Phone: 858-952-0352 Email: victoria@bamlawca.com YUSEN LOGISTICS INC: Grass Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ---------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Justin Grass, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. YUSEN LOGISTICS (AMERICAS) INC., a New York corporation, Case No. 26-2-08668-8 was removed from Superior Court for Pierce County, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on July 10, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-05762. The Plaintiff seeks to recover alleged compensatory and exemplary damages arising from Yusen's allegedly unlawful policies and practices that Plaintiff claims denied him and putative class members of their statutory meal periods, rest periods, overtime pay, and/or any other part of their wages in accordance with the Washington State Minimum Wage Act ("MWA"). Further, the Complaint seeks to recover for alleged failure to accrue and allow use of paid sick leave, alleged unlawful deductions and rebates, and alleged failure to pay all wages. Finally, the Complaint seeks double damages, pre and post-judgment interest, and declaratory relief.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Douglas Han, Esq. Shunt Tatavos-Gharajeh, Esq. Dean Petitta, Esq. JUSTICE LAW CORPORATION 751 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 101 Pasadena, CA 91103 Phone: (818) 230-7502 Facsimile: (818) 230-7259 Email: dhan@justicelawcorp.com; statavos@justicelawcorp.com; dpetitta@justicelawcorp.com; mdoering@justicelawcorp.com; shanneyan@justicelawcorp.com; fgonzalez@justicelawcorp.com The Defendants are represented by: Adam G. Cuff, Esq. Laurence A. Shapero, Esq. Lauren S. Titchbourne, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 5150 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-693-7057 | Fax: 206-693-7058 Email: adam.cuff@ogletree.com laurence.shapero@ogletree.com lauren.titchbourne@ogletree.com ZAM'S HOPE: Denies Safe Living Conditions, Henderson Says --------------------------------------------------------- TYRELLE MOTRAY HENDERSON JR., individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ZAM'S HOPE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER; CITY OF HARVEY; COUNTY OF COOK; DON BEACHEM; ZEHRA QUADRI; CORNELL WASHINGTON; and BILLY HOLMES, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-08221 (N.D. Ill., July 10, 2026) is a civil rights action under the First And Fourteenth Amendments, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Illinois law. In this complaint, the Plaintiff alleges Defendants subjected residents to unsafe, unsanitary, violent, retaliatory, and unconstitutional conditions in a government-connected halfway house, reentry housing provider, residential resource center, or residential placement location. Residents were connected to Zam's Hope through Cook County, Cook County Probation, OCJ, Cook County Electronic Monitoring, the Cook County Sheriff's Department, parole, probation, courts, or related government systems. Zam's Hope received approximately $100.00 per day per resident, or other compensation, reimbursement, funding, rent payment, or financial benefit to provide housing, food, supervision, basic necessities, program resources, and related services. Despite receiving or benefiting from such payment or support, Defendants failed to provide safe housing, pest control, adequate food, sanitation, working bathrooms, working showers, safe plumbing, safe electrical systems, proper trash disposal, safe sleeping areas, adequate staffing, and protection from violence, asserts the complaint. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered damages and seeks all relief allowed by law. Plaintiff Tyrelle Motray Henderson Jr. is an adult Illinois resident and was a resident of Zam's Hope Community Resource Center's Harvey location during the relevant period. Defendant Zam's Hope Community Resource Center operated and controlled the Harvey location at 15246 Lexington Avenue, Harvey, Illinois 60426. Defendant Don Beachem, also known as Don Beachem Sr., is alleged to be the Executive Director of Zam's Hope and exercised executive, operational, supervisory, disciplinary, housing, financial, and policymaking authority. Defendant Zehra Quadri is alleged to be the founder of Zam's Hope. Defendant Cornell Washington was a house manager, worker, staff member, supervisor, agent, or person acting with actual or parent authority of the Harvey location. Defendant Billy Holmes was a chef, cook, staff member, worker, agent, or person acting with actual or parent authority of the Harvey location. Defendant City of Harvey is a municipal corporation located in Cook county, Illinois. Defendant County of cook is a government entity located in Illinois.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Tyrelle Motray Henderson Jr. Pro Se Plaintiff 15346 Lexington Avenue Harvey, IL 60426 Telephone: 872-372-5014 E-mail: freedomtopracticelaw@gmail.com ZILLOW INC: Dobbins Suit Alleges Violation of FCRA -------------------------------------------------- CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH DOBBINS, individually and on behalf of and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ZILLOW, INC., Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-00670 (E.D. Va., July 15, 2026) alleges violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Zillow, Inc. is an online real estate marketplace. The Company helps to buy, sell, and rent real estate properties. Zillow serves customers in the United States. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Leonard A. Bennett, Esq. Craig C. Marchiando, Esq. CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, P.C. 763 J. Clyde Morris Blvd., Suite 1-A Newport News, VA 23601 Telephone: (757) 930-3660 Facsimile: (757) 930-3662 Email: lenbennett@clalegal.com craig@clalegal.com ZIPRECRUITER INC: Smith Sues Over Breach of Fiduciary Duty ---------------------------------------------------------- DANIEL SMITH, Plaintiff v. ZIPRECRUITER, INC., IAN SIEGEL, CIPORA HERMAN, YVONNE HAO, BRIE CARERE, BLAKE IRVING, EMILY MCEVILLY, MIKE GUPTA, and ERIC LIAW, Defendants, Case No. No. 2026-0798-JTL (Del. Ch., June 23, 2026) is a verified stockholder class action complaint arising from the Defendants' alleged breach of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment. According to the complaint, ZipRecruiter's Board of Director fails to protect the interests of unaffiliated stockholders when it allows Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson Ian Siegel to obtain majority control of the Company, and facilitate a transfer of majority control from IVP to himself. The Plaintiff claims that the company's Buyback Program provided improper and highly valuable benefits to Siegel that are unfair to the unaffiliated stockholders. Plaintiff Smith is a stockholder of ZipRecruiter. ZipRecruiter is an online marketplace for jobseekers with principal executive offices in Santa Monica, California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Peter B. Andrews, Esq. David M. Sborz, Esq. Andrew J. Peach, Esq. Jackson E. Warren, Esq. ANDREWS & SPRINGER LLC 4001 Kennett Pike, Suite 250 Wilmington, DE 19807 Telephone: (302) 504-4957 Email: pandrews@andrewsspringer.com dsborz@andrewsspringer.com apeach@andrewspringer.com jwarren@andrewsspringer.com ********* S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA. Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L. Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors. Copyright 2026. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272. This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the publishers. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed. The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000. *** End of Transmission ***