260624.mbx

260624.mbx C L A S S A C T I O N R E P O R T E R Wednesday, June 24, 2026, Vol. 28, No. 125 Headlines 3M COMPANY: Coleman Suit Transferred to D. South Carolina ACCESS DENTAL: Fails to Protect Sensitive Data, Diaz Alleges ADVANCED PSYCHIATRY: Gaitan Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ADVANCED PSYCHIATRY: Knight Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. AIDS HEALTHCARE: Sanchez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. BELKIN INT'L: Hart Sues Over Discontinued Wemo Smart Home Features CARIBE PHYSICIANS: Fails to Safeguard Personal Info, Rodriguez Says DELAWARE NORTH: Fails to Safeguard Private Info, Rosario Alleges DIGNITY HEALTH: FLC Withdrawn as Hunter-Neal's Attorney DOT TRANSPORTATION: Joint Status Report Due July 15 DOXIMITY INC: Class Settlement in Securities Suit Gets Approval FINANCIAL CRIMES: Parties Must File Joint Case Management Report FOOT LOCKER INC: Rapoza Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. FORUM ENTERTAINMENT: Gardner Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. FROEDTERT THEDACARE: Breaches Fiduciary Duties, Dionne Suit Says GLEIBERMAN PROPERTIES: Class Cert. Bid Filing Due Sept. 15 GRUMA CORPORATION: Guerrero Suit Removed to M.D. Pennsylvania HOLLIDAYSBURG, PA: Faces Suit Over Alleged LGBTQ+ Community Hatred IQVIA RDS: Rodriguez Wage and Hour Suit Removed to C.D. Cal. JM WIRELESS LLC: Sanchez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. JOSEPHINE'S RESTAURANT: Eigenberger Files FLSA Suit in D. Arizona JOY ORGANICS LLC: Guzman Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH: Foster Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. KEFFER AUTOMOTIVE: Stone Files TCPA Suit in D. South Carolina KKR & CO: Fails to Safeguard Personal Info, Hinds Alleges LA PRITCHARD SUPPLY: Standing Order Entered in Bryant Class Suit LIBERTY MUTUAL: Class Certification in Summerset Due Dec. 30 LIME ROCK: Class Settlement in Chastain Suit Gets Initial Nod LIV GOLF: Class Certification Filing in Haskell Due May 15, 2027 LOGAN ALUMINUM: Cherry Sues Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages LP CAL OPS LLC: Reyes Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: Neal Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. MAGNITE INC: Can File Sur-reply in Opposition to Class Cert Bid MAGNUS HOLDING: Taylor Sues for Breach of Fiduciary Duty MAGPUL INDUSTRIES: Website Inaccessible to Blind Users, Bishop Says MAH GROUP: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Wilson Due Sept. 28 MANOS HOME CARE INC: Jones Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. MARUGAME UDON USA: Cruz Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. MASSACHUSETTS: Settlement Class Gets Certification MAULDIN & JENKINS: Brunetti Files Suit in N.D. Georgia MAULDIN & JENKINS: Niessing Files Suit in E.D. Missouri MERCADO LA PRINCESA: Magdaleno Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. MONEYKEY INCORPORATED: Riley Files FCRA Suit in D. Arizona MOSES STANCIL: Cary Loses Class Certification Bid MUENSTER MILLING: Rendon Suit Removed to C.D. California MYUNG GA TOFU: Ko Seeks Conditional Collective Certification NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DE: Vick Files Suit in Del. Super. Ct. NEW DAWN NURSING: Wright Sues Over Unpaid Compensations NIAGEN BIOSCIENCE: Hart Sues Over Deceptive NR Supplements Ads NIKE INC: Class Cert Bid Filing in Ma Suit Due June 11, 2027 NIKE INC: Final Pretrial Order Entered in Cahill Class Suit NOW OPTICS LLC: Lucio Files TCPA Suit in E.D. California NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS: Ozuna Suit Removed to E.D. Washington NUVANCE HEALTH: Rose Files Suit for Breach of Fiduciary Duty ON INC: Norberg Files Suit in D. Oregon OSHKOSH CORP: Fountain Valley Suit Transferred to E.D. Wisconsin PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS: Sanchez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. PLAZA HOME MORTGAGE: Regehr Files Suit in S.D. California PRESTIGE CONSUMER: Harris Suit Removed to C.D. California QSI LLC: Webb Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. RETAIL SERVICES: Fails to Safeguard Personal Info, Reaume Says SAILY INC: Blind Users Face Barriers to Website Access, Senior Says SANFORD RAKOFSKY: Brito Sues Over Inaccessible Property SIERRA VISTA HOSPITAL: Barnes Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. SONY INTERACTIVE: Qureshi Suit Transferred to N.D. California SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REHAB: Bluemel Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. SPRING OAKS CAPITAL: Davis Files FDCPA Suit in N.D. Illinois STAR VIEW BEHAVIORAL: Chacon Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. STEPP'S TOWING: Bucknall Sues Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages STRATEGIC EDUCATION: Washam Files Suit in E.D. Virginia STRATEGIC EDUCATION: Wethington Files Suit in E.D. Virginia STRATEGIC STAFFING: Gleason Suit Seeks Overtime Wages Under FLSA T.N. WARD COMPANY: Whitton Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. TASSOS STRIFAS: Mejia Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages TELEFLORA LLC: Website Conceals Tracking Tools, Schallert Says THEDACARE INC: Hietpas Sues Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages TRIZETTO PROVIDER: Taylor Suit Transferred to E.D. Mo. TURNERSVILLE DODGE: Kemble Files Suit in D. New Jersey UNITEDHEALTH GROUP: Dov Wills Suit Transferred to D. Minnesota UNITEDHEALTH GROUP: E5 Therapy Suit Transferred to D. Minnesota UNITEDHEALTH GROUP: K. Sasse Suit Transferred to D. Minnesota UNITEDHEALTH GROUP: Serenity Therapy Suit Transferred to D. Minn. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP: Sunny Days Suit Transferred to D. Minnesota UNIVERSAL LLC: Singh Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. URBANSTEMS INC: Senior Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website USA HOME IMPROVEMENT: Wohlstein Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida VALERUS HOME EXPERTS: Russell Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida VEHO TECH INC: Igwedimma Sues Over Failure to Pay Wages VENTURE GLOBAL LNG: Trahan Files FLSA Suit in E.D. Virginia WASHINGTON: Black Suit Removed to W.D. Washington XSOLIS INC: Fails to Secure Personal, Health Info, Dion Says XSOLIS INC: Todd Files Suit in M.D. Tennessee YOUNG'S MARKET COMPANY: Gomez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ZORRO ENTERPRISES: Agusta Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. ********* 3M COMPANY: Coleman Suit Transferred to D. South Carolina --------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Charles Coleman, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 3M Company, et al., Case No. 2:26-cv-00855 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, to the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina on June 9, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02259-RMG to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Personal Inj. Prod. Liability for Personal Injury. 3M -- http://www.3m.com/-- is an American multinational conglomerate operating in the fields of industry, worker safety, healthcare, and consumer goods.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gregory A. Cade, Esq. Gary A. Anderson, Esq. Kevin B. McKie, Esq. Yahn Eric Olson, Esq. ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION GROUP, P.C. 2160 Highland Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35205 Phone: (205) 328-9200 Fax: (205) 328-9456 Email: gregc@elglaw.com gary@elglaw.com kmckie@elglaw.com yolson@elglaw.com The Defendants are represented by: William Larkin Radney, IV, Esq. Harlan Irby Prater, IV, Esq. M. Christian King, Esq. LIGHTFOOT FRANKLIN WHITE 400 20th Street North Birmingham, AL 35203 Phone: (205) 581-0714 Fax: (205) 581-0799 Email: lradney@lightfootlaw.com hprater@lightfootlaw.com cking@lightfootlaw.com - and - Jacob Miller Salow, Esq. LIGHTFOOT FRANKLIN & WHITE, LLC The Clark Building, 400 20th St., North Birmingham, AL 35203 Phone: (205) 581-0726 Fax: (205) 581-0799 Email: jsalow@lightfootlaw.com ACCESS DENTAL: Fails to Protect Sensitive Data, Diaz Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------ ODIE DIAZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ACCESS DENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC d/b/a ACCESS DENTAL & ORTHODONTICS, Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-01938-B (N.D. Tex., June 11, 2026) arises from Defendant's failure to protect highly sensitive data. The complaint relates that the Defendant stores a litany of highly sensitive personal identifiable information and protected health information about its current and former patients. But Defendant lost control over that data when cybercriminals infiltrated its insufficiently protected computer systems in a data breach. On June 5, 2026, cybercriminal group, "World Leaks", announced that they were able to breach Defendant's systems and exfiltrate patient information. Through its inadequate security practices, Defendant exposed Plaintiff's and the Class's Private Information for theft and sale on the dark web. Following the Data Breach, Plaintiff has experienced a large influx of spam calls. Plaintiff suffered actual injury from the exposure and theft of her Private Information, which violates her rights to privacy, says the suit. In addition to injunctive relief, Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and the other Class Members, also seeks compensatory damages for Defendant's invasion of privacy, which includes the value of the privacy interest invaded by Defendant, the costs of future monitoring of their credit history for identity theft and fraud, plus prejudgment interest and costs. Defendant Access Dental Management Services, LLC d/b/a Access Dental & Orthodontics is a multi-location dental service organization that operates a network of dental clinics providing general and specialty oral healthcare. Plaintiff Jodie Diaz is a patient of the Defendant.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Cassandra P. Miller, Esq. STRAUSS BORRELLI PLLC One Magnificent Mile 980 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 Telephone: (872) 263-1100 Facsimile: (872) 263-1109 E-mail: cmiller@straussborrelli.com ADVANCED PSYCHIATRY: Gaitan Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Advanced Psychiatry Associates. The case is styled as Maria Gaitan, all others similarly situated v. Advanced Psychiatry Associates, Case No. 26CV014229 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., June 10, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as "Other Commercial/Business Tort (Not Fraud/Breach of Contract)." Advanced Psychiatry Associates -- https://advancedpsychiatryassociates.com/ -- are full-service psychiatric facility that offers a wide range of mental health services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Anderson Berry, Esq. EMERY REDDY PC 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (916) 823-6955 Email: anderson@emeryreddy.com ADVANCED PSYCHIATRY: Knight Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Advanced Psychiatry Associates. The case is styled as Robert Knight, on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Advanced Psychiatry Associates, Case No. 26CV013989 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., June 9, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as "Other Non-Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death Tort." Advanced Psychiatry Associates -- https://advancedpsychiatryassociates.com/ -- encourage individuals to seek out our assistance to promote better mental health throughout our community.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: John J. Nelson, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 280 S. Beverly Dr. Beverly Hills, CA 92102 Phone: (858) 209-6941 Fax: (865) 522-0049 Email: jnelson@milberg.com AIDS HEALTHCARE: Sanchez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Aids Healthcare Foundation. The case is styled as Henry Arturo Sanchez, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and current and former aggrieved employees v. Aids Healthcare Foundation, Case No. 26STCV18697 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., June 11, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) -- https://www.aidshealth.org/ -- is a global nonprofit organization providing cutting-edge medicine and advocacy to millions worldwide.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: David Lavi, Esq. E&L, LLP 8889 W. Olympic Blvd., 2nd Floor Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: 213-213-0000 Fax: 213-213-0025 Email: dlavi@ebralavi.com BELKIN INT'L: Hart Sues Over Discontinued Wemo Smart Home Features ------------------------------------------------------------------ THEODORE HART, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-06407 (C.D. Cal., June 11, 2026) arises from Defendant's decision to unilaterally disable essential functionality of dozens of its Wemo smart home products years after selling those products to consumers who paid a premium for their connected capabilities. According to the complaint, for years, Belkin marketed Wemo as a connected smart home ecosystem that allowed consumers to remotely monitor, automate, schedule, and control devices throughout their homes. Belkin represented that consumers could "control and automate things around your home" through internet-connected technology and touted compatibility with major voice assistants, including Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant. These capabilities were not incidental features, but were the very reason consumers purchased Wemo products and paid prices significantly higher than comparable non-smart alternatives. On July 10, 2025, however, Belkin announced that it would discontinue Wemo cloud services and app support for select Wemo products effective January 31, 2026. Belkin further informed consumers that, after that date, the Wemo app and all cloud-based features, including remote access and voice assistant integrations (Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant), will no longer function for affected products. In other words, Belkin did not merely stop providing customer support for legacy products, it affirmatively eliminated functionality that consumers had already purchased. Products marketed and sold as "smart" devices would no longer perform many of the functions that distinguished them from substantially less expensive conventional alternatives. Consumers who purchased these products for their connected capabilities were left with devices that no longer operated as represented at the time of sale. Following Belkin's decision, Plaintiffs and the Class were deprived of a substantial portion of the benefit of their bargain and forced either to accept materially diminished products or incur additional expense to purchase replacement devices that restore the functionality Belkin removed, asserts the complaint. The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated consumers seeking damages, restitution, injunctive relief, and all other remedies available under federal and state law arising from Belkin's unfair, deceptive, and unlawful conduct. Plaintiff Theodore Hart has purchased multiple Belkin Wemo products for personal, family, and household use. Defendant Belkin International, Inc. is a global consumer electronics company that designs, manufactures, markets, and sells connectivity, networking, and home automation products throughout the United States and internationally.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Tina Wolfson, Esq. AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 500 Burbank, CA 91505 Telephone: (310) 474-9111 Facsimile: (310) 474-8585 E-mail: twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com - and - Bradley K. King, Esq. AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 521 Fifth Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10175 Telephone: (917) 336-0171 Facsimile: (917) 336-0177 E-mail: bking@ahdootwolfson.com CARIBE PHYSICIANS: Fails to Safeguard Personal Info, Rodriguez Says ------------------------------------------------------------------- REBECA REYES RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CARIBE PHYSICIANS PLAZA CORPORATION d/b/a HOSPITAL CARIBBEAN MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-01364 (D.P.R., June 8, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to properly secure and safeguard sensitive information of Plaintiff and Class Members which resulted in a data breach. The complaint relates that in connection with the medical services Defendant provides, Plaintiff and Class Members were required to provide highly sensitive data to Defendant, including but not limited to their names, addresses, Social Security numbers, medical information, health insurance information, dates of birth, and other sensitive data. Subsequently, the ransomware group TheGentlemen publicly claimed responsibility for a cyberattack against the Defendant on March 16, 2026, and threatened to leak the data if a ransom was not paid. On March 30, 2026, Defendant sent notice letters to affected individuals notifying them of the Data Breach. The Plaintiff's Private Information was in Defendant's possession at the time of the Data Breach, and was subsequently compromised. As a result, Plaintiff and Class Members suffered concrete injuries in fact including, but not limited to: (i) invasion of privacy; (ii) theft of their Private Information; (iii) lost or diminished value of Private Information; (iv) lost time and opportunity costs associated with attempting to mitigate the actual consequences of the Data Breach; (v) loss of benefit of the bargain; (vi) lost opportunity costs associated with attempting to mitigate the actual consequences of the Data Breach; (vii) experiencing an increase in spam calls, texts, and/or emails; (viii) nominal damages; and (ix) the continued and certainly increased risk to their Private Information, says the suit. Through this Complaint, Plaintiff seeks to remedy these harms on behalf of herself and all similarly situated individuals whose Private Information was accessed during the Data Breach. Defendant Caribe Physicians Plaza Corporation d/b/a Hospital Caribbean Medical Center is a general hospital providing emergency room services, pediatric services, and a wide array of other medical services in Fajardo, Puerto Rico.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Douglas H. Sanders, Esq. MILBERG, LLC 1311 Ponce de Leon Ave. Suite 600 San Juan, PR, 00907 Telephone: (516) 741-5600 Facsimile: (516) 741-0128 E-mail: dsanders@milberg.com - and - Leanna Loginov, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, P.A. 14 NE 1st Ave, Suite 705 Miami, FL 33132 Telephone: 305-479-2299 E-mail: lloginov@shamisgentile.com - and - Mariya Weekes, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 333 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 2000 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (866) 252-0878 E-mail: mweekes@milberg.com DELAWARE NORTH: Fails to Safeguard Private Info, Rosario Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------------- CARLOS ROSARIO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. DELAWARE NORTH COMPANIES, INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-01172 (W.D.N.Y., June 9, 2026) is a class action seeking injunctive and declaratory relief arising from Defendant's failure to safeguard the personally identifiable information or private information of Plaintiff and Class Members, which resulted in unauthorized access to its information systems on January 28, 2026, and the compromised and unauthorized disclosure of that Private Information, causing widespread injury and damages to Plaintiff and others similarly situated. The complaint relates that in connection with the services Defendant provides, Plaintiff and Class Members, were required to provide Defendant with sensitive and confidential Private Information, including their names, drivers' license numbers or state identification numbers that would be held by Delaware North in its computer systems. On June 5, 2026, Defendant began notifying Plaintiff and Class Members that on January 28, 2026, it detected unusual activity in an employee's Microsoft account. The information compromised during the data breach includes, at the very least, personal information provided to Delaware North including names and driver's license numbers or state issued identification numbers. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff and Class Members have suffered and will continue to suffer other forms of injury and/or harm, including, but not limited to, anxiety, emotional distress, loss of privacy, and other economic and non-economic losses, says the suit. Plaintiff Carlos Rosario is a resident and citizen of the Southaven, Mississippi. Defendant Delaware North Companies, Inc. is one of the largest privately-owned hospitality and entertainment companies in the world.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Andrew J. Shamis, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, P.A. 14 NE 1st Avenue, Suite 705 Miami, FL 33132 Telephone: 305-479-2299 E-mail: ashamis@shamisgentile.com DIGNITY HEALTH: FLC Withdrawn as Hunter-Neal's Attorney ------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as MICHELE WALKER, PEARL IRENE WISE, and TAMI HUNTER-NEAL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. DIGNITY HEALTH, a California Corporation, dba MERCY MEDICAL CENTER – MERCED and DOES 1 to 100, Case No. 1:23-cv-00349-FJS (E.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge entered an order that: (1) Frontier Law Center's motion to withdraw as attorney for the Plaintiff Tami Hunter-Neal is granted; (2) Attorney Janelle Carney's motion to withdraw as attorney for the Plaintiff Tami HunterNeal is granted; (3) The Clerk of the Court shall reflect this change on the court's docket and relieve Frontier Law Center and Attorney Janelle Carney as attorneys of record for the Plaintiff Tami-Hunter Neal; (4) Withdrawing Counsel shall provide a copy of this order to the clients within seven (7) days of this order at 357 W. Alexander Ave., Merced, CA 95348; and (5) The hearing set for June 26, 2026, in Courtroom 8 (FJS) at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Frank J. Singer is vacated. It is unlikely that prejudice will result to other litigants because the Plaintiff Irene Wise is an active, named representative for the proposed class. Furthermore, the Plaintiff Tami Neal-Hunter has other counsel on record to represent her even if Frontier Law Center and Attorney Janelle Carney are permitted to withdraw. On May 31, 2022, Plaintiffs Michele Walker, Pearl Irene Wise, and Tami Hunter initiated a class action against the Defendant Dignity Health in Merced County Superior Court. The action was removed to the United States Court for the Eastern District of California on March 9, 2023. Dignity is a California-based not-for-profit public-benefit corporation. A copy of the Court's order dated June 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=1blU5j at no extra charge.[CC] DOT TRANSPORTATION: Joint Status Report Due July 15 --------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Watson v. DOT Transportation, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01303 (E.D. Cal., Filed: July 23, 2021), the Hon. Judge Dena M. Coggins entered an order that the parties shall file a Joint Status Report regarding their mediation efforts by July 15, 2026. Upon review of the parties' Stipulation and good cause appearing, the court will defer ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification until after the parties' completion of the private mediation scheduled for July 8, 2026. On June 8, 2026, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation to stay ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification pending completion of mediation. The nature of suit states Labor Litigation. Dot Transportation is the transportation subsidiary of Dot Foods.[CC] DOXIMITY INC: Class Settlement in Securities Suit Gets Approval --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned re Doximity, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 5:24-cv-02281-NW (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Wise entered judgment (as modified) approving class action settlement -- The Court certifies, for the purposes of the Settlement only, a Settlement Class consisting of: "all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Doximity common stock from June 24, 2021 through Aug. 8, 2023, inclusive ("Class Period") and were damaged thereby." Excluded from the Settlement Class are: (i) the Defendants; (ii) any current or former Officers or directors of Doximity; (iii) the Immediate Family members of the Defendant Tangney or any current or former Officer or director of Doximity; (iv) any entity that any excluded person owns or controls, or owned or controlled, during the Class Period; and (v) the successors or assigns of any such excluded persons. Also excluded from the Settlement Class are the persons listed on Exhibit 1 hereto who or which are excluded from the Settlement Class pursuant to request. -- The Court appoints Lead Plaintiff as Class Representative for the Settlement Class and appoints Lead Counsel Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class. -- The Action and all of the claims asserted against the Defendants in the Action by Lead Plaintiff and Settlement Class Members are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants. The Parties shall bear their own costs and expenses, except as otherwise expressly provided in the Stipulation. Doximity is a network of physicians and advance practice clinicians. A copy of the Court's order dated June 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=vYsSqY at no extra charge.[CC] FINANCIAL CRIMES: Parties Must File Joint Case Management Report ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Kiosko Multiservicios LLC, v. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, et al., Case No. 2:26-cv-02389-KML (D. Ariz.), the Hon. Judge Lanham entered an order granting the motion for preliminary injunction. The Court further orders that the Defendants are preliminarily enjoined from requiring Kiosko to file Currency Transaction Reports ("CTRs") under the March 2026 Geographic Targeting Order ("GTO") for transactions of $1,000 or more that would not otherwise be reportable under existing CTR regulations. The parties are directed to meet, confer, and develop a Rule 26(f) Joint Case Management Report, which must be filed within 4 weeks of the date of this order. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Order containing all the proposed dates at the same time they file the Rule 26(f) Case Management Report. Kiosko has raised serious questions going to the merits on its notice-and-comment claim, has shown likely irreparable harm, and has shown the balance of hardships and public interest favor injunctive relief. Because the irreparable-harm showing is specific to Kiosko, broader preliminary relief is not warranted. Accordingly, the Defendants are enjoined from enforcing the March 2026 GTO as to Kiosko. On May 8, 2026, the court granted a temporary restraining order preventing defendant FinCEN from enforcing its March 2026 GTO that increased reporting requirements for plaintiff Kiosko Multiservicios LLC. Kiosko is a money services business(“MSB”) that provides money transfers, money orders, and checkcashing services in Maricopa County. A copy of the Court's order dated June 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=IJ86Tq at no extra charge.[CC] FOOT LOCKER INC: Rapoza Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Foot Locker, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Julia Rapoza, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Foot Locker, Inc., Does 1-100, Inclusive, Case No. 26-CIV-04158 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Mateo Cty., May 26, 2026). The case type is stated as "Complex Civil Unlimited Class Action." Foot Locker, Inc. -- https://www.footlocker-inc.com/ -- is a leading footwear and apparel retailer.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mark D. Potter, Esq. POTTER HANDY LLP 100 Pine St., Ste. 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (858) 375-7385 Fax: (888) 422-5191 Email: mark@potterhandy.com FORUM ENTERTAINMENT: Gardner Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Forum Entertainment LLC et al. The case is styled as Willie Gardner, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. Forum Entertainment LLC, Kia Forum, Case No. 26STCV18018 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., June 5, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." Forum Entertainment LLC, doing business as Kia Forum -- https://thekiaforum.com/ -- operates as a sports and entertainment company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alvin B. Lindsay, Esq. D.LAW, INC. 450 N. Brand Blvd. Suite 840 Glendale, CA 91203 Phone: (818) 962-6465 Fax: (818) 962-6469 Email: alindsay@d.law - and - William Tran, Esq. D.LAW, INC. 250 N. Madison Ave. Pasadena, CA 91101 Phone: 818-962-6465 Fax: 818-962-6469 Email: w.tran@d.law FROEDTERT THEDACARE: Breaches Fiduciary Duties, Dionne Suit Says ---------------------------------------------------------------- JAMES D. DIONNE and DAWN KNAPP, individually, and as representatives of a Class of Participants and Beneficiaries of the Froedtert Health, Inc. 403(b) Plan v. FROEDTERT THEDACARE HEALTH, INC., FROEDTERT HEALTH, INC., BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF FROEDTERT THEDACARE HEALTH, INC., and FROEDTERT HEALTH RETIREMENT PLAN SUBCOMMITTEE, Case No. 2:26-cv-1078 (E.D. Wisc., June 16, 2026) is a class action under 29 U.S.C. section 1132(a)(2) on behalf of the Froedtert Health, Inc. 403(b) Plan and the Plan's participants and beneficiaries against the Defendants for breach of fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The Froedtert Defendants are all fiduciaries to the Froedtert Plan. During the Class Period (June 16, 2020, to the present), the Defendants utilized the Froedtert' Plan's forfeitures, a type of plan asset, to benefit themselves by reducing their future employer matching contributions to the Plan, violating ERISA's fiduciary duties of loyalty and prudence. Plan forfeitures should have been used to also pay Plan administrative expenses instead of exclusively making employer matching contributions and by failing to do so, Defendants breached their duties of loyalty and prudence to Plan participants. More specifically, the Plaintiffs allege that Defendants: (a) improperly utilized forfeited Plan assets exclusively to disloyally reduce future employer matching contributions which favored the employer's financial interests over participants' interests; (b) did not engage in any prudent process when deciding to use Plan forfeitures for the employer's own benefit rather than to reduce Plan expenses; and (c) failed to monitor those responsible on the Plan Committee for allocation of Plan forfeitures. The Plan itself identified expense payment as the first available use of forfeitures, yet nobody ever analyzed whether that option should be used. The Plaintiffs' forfeiture claims are brought on behalf of the Plan and seek equitable remedies for losses suffered by the Plan under 29 U.S.C. sections 1132(a)(2) and 409(a), alleges the suit. The Plaintiffs suffered concrete injuries to their Plan accounts because they paid Plan administrative expenses that could have been reduced or eliminated had forfeitures been allocated differently. Those injuries are fairly traceable to Defendants disloyally and imprudently using Plan forfeitures for their own benefit to reduce their future contributions to the Froedtert Plan, and these injuries diminished the savings in Plaintiffs' retirement accounts, the suit further contends. Froedtert Health is a Wisconsin nonstock corporation that, during a portion of the Class Period, sponsored and/or administered the Froedtert Plan, and operates hospitals, clinics, physician practices, and related healthcare facilities throughout Wisconsin.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Paul M. Secunda, Esq. WALCHESKE & LUZI, LLC 1100 N. Mayfair Rd., Suite 270 Wauwatosa, WI 53226 Telephone: (414) 828-2372 E-mail: psecunda@walcheskeluzi.com GLEIBERMAN PROPERTIES: Class Cert. Bid Filing Due Sept. 15 ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Centariczki v. Gleiberman Properties, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-00127 (D. Or., Filed Jan. 19, 2024), the Hon. Judge Jeff Armistead entered an order adopting the proposed deadlines as follows: (1) Discovery is to be completed by Aug. 31, 2026. (2) Further Dispositive Motions are due by Aug. 31, 2026. (3) Deadline to move for class certification is Sept. 15, 2026. The court defers setting a trial date at this time. The June 12, 2026 Status Conference is no longer necessary and is stricken. The nature of suit states Real Property - All Other Real Property.[CC] GRUMA CORPORATION: Guerrero Suit Removed to M.D. Pennsylvania ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Yoranny De La Cruz Guerrero, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. GRUMA CORPORATION, Case No. 202604930 was removed from the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, to the United States District Court for Middle District of Pennsylvania on June 8, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-01518-JKM. In her Complaint, Plaintiff alleges Gruma "violated the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act by failing to pay Plaintiff and other class members any wages (including overtime wages) for time associated with, among other things, the mandatory activities" referenced in the Complaint. In her Complaint, Plaintiff also alleges Gruma violated Pennsylvania common law by denying Plaintiff and other class members "wages for 'all hours worked' in violation of the PMWA's statutory mandate."[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Jacqueline R. Barrett, Esq. Lee E. Tankle, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 1735 Market Street, Suite 3000 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Phone: (215) 995-2831 Email: jacqueline.barrett@ogletree.com lee.tankle@ogletree.com - and - Patrick F. Hulla, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 700 W. 47th Street, Suite 500 Kansas City, MO 64112 Phone: (816) 410-2226 Email: patrick.hulla@ogletree.com HOLLIDAYSBURG, PA: Faces Suit Over Alleged LGBTQ+ Community Hatred ------------------------------------------------------------------ JANE DOE, JANE ROE, and all other similarly situated v. HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, CURTIS WHITESEL, an INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, DALE McCALL, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL OF HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, and BENJAMIN CALDWELL, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS TITLE IX COORDINATOR OF HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Case No. 3:2026cv01142 (W.D. Pa., June 16, 2026) is a proposed class action against Hollidaysburg Area School District, whose School Board, or School Board of Directors, on account of alleged hatred toward members of the LGBTQ+ community, including LGBTQ+ teachers and students in the District. On October 15, 2025, the Board of Directors voted 8-0 to formally pass a blatantly homophobic, District-wide policy that explicitly states, in pertinent part, for purposes of this action: "Decor related to sexual orientation or gender identity, in the classroom, and in the school buildings, and/or at school activities is prohibited," and which expressly prohibits "any flag, banner, poster, sign, sticker, pin, button, insignia, paraphernalia, photograph, or other similar material that advocates concerning sexual orientation or gender identity." To the contrary, the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission passed guidance in August of 2018, which was passed even before Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, 590 U.S. 644 (2020) was decided, and which is currently still in effect, that interpreted the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act as explicitly prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity as a form of discrimination on the basis of sex, including in employment, housing, public accommodations, and including in educational institutions like Defendant, Hollidaysburg Area School District, the suit adds. The Hollidaysburg Area School District is a midsized, suburban public school district which is based in Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania. It serves the boroughs of Duncansville, Hollidaysburg, and Newry, and the townships of Allegheny, Blair, Frankstown, and Juniata.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Justin Robinette, Esq. 1650 Market Street, Ste. 3600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (267) 595-6254 Facsimile: (267) 592-3067 E-mail: Justin@JRobineneLaw.com IQVIA RDS: Rodriguez Wage and Hour Suit Removed to C.D. Cal. ------------------------------------------------------------ The case styled as JESUS RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and current and former aggrieved employees, Plaintiff v. IQVIA RDS INC., a North Carolina corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. CIVSB2603817, was removed from the Superior Court for the County of San Bernardino to the United States District Court for the Central District of California on June 11, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-6361 to the proceeding. In this complaint, the Plaintiff asserts general allegations that Defendant failed to pay him and putative class members for all minimum and overtime wages; failed to provide compliant rest and meal periods; failed to pay all wages timely during employment and separation. The complaint also asserts ancillary and derivate claims for failure to pay sick and vacation pay and failure to provide accurate, itemized wage statements. IQVIA RDS INC. provides scientific research and development services.[BN] The Defendant is represented by: Geoffrey C. Westbrook, Esq. Annette L. Rose, Esq. Natalie C. Kreeger, Esq. SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2300 Sacramento, CA 95814-4428 Telephone: (916) 448-0159 Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 E-mail: gwestbrook@seyfarth.com arose@seyfarth.com nkreeger@seyfarth.com JM WIRELESS LLC: Sanchez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against JM Wireless LLC. The case is styled as Sarah Sanchez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JM Wireless LLC, Case No. 26STCV16986 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 29, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." JM Wireless LLC is a major authorized retailer for Metro by T-Mobile.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: James Michael Treglio, Esq. POTTER HANDY LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (858) 375-7385 Fax: (888) 422-5191 Email: jimt@potterhandy.com JOSEPHINE'S RESTAURANT: Eigenberger Files FLSA Suit in D. Arizona ----------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Josephine's Restaurant Incorporated, et al. The case is styled as Kyra Eigenberger, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Josephine's Restaurant Incorporated, Anthony B Cosentino, Marlene Cosentino, Case No. 2:26-cv-03835-SPL (D. Ariz., May 29, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Josephine's Restaurant Incorporated -- https://www.josephinesrestaurant.com/ -- is a new American bistro in a historic restored bungalow, complete with front porch & stone fireplace.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Christopher Jacob Bendau, Esq. Clifford Phillip Bendau, II, Esq. BENDAU LAW FIRM PLLC P.O. Box 97066 Phoenix, AZ 85060 Phone: (480) 382-5176 Fax: (480) 304-3805 Email: chris@bendaulaw.com cliffordbendau@bendaulaw.com JOY ORGANICS LLC: Guzman Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Joy Organics LLC. The case is styled as Roxane Guzman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Joy Organics LLC d/b/a WWW.JOYORGANICS.COM, Case No. 26CU028326C (Cal. Super. Ct., San Diego Cty., May 22, 2026). Joy Organics -- https://joyorganics.com/ -- offers a variety of premium CBD products, including CBD tinctures, salves, gummies, softgels and more.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott J. Ferrell, Esq. PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS APC 4100 Newport Place Drive Suite 800 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: (949) 706-6464 Fax: (949) 706-6469 Email: sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH: Foster Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. -------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. The case is styled as Anthony Foster, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Kaiser Permanente, Case No. 26CV190713 (Cal. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty., May 28, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Non-Personal Injury/Property Damage Tort." Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. doing business as Kaiser Permanente -- https://healthy.kaiserpermanente.org/ -- is an American integrated managed care consortium headquartered in Oakland, California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Tina Wolfson, Esq. AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 521 5th Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10175 Phone: (917) 336-0271 Fax: (917) 336-0177 Email: twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com KEFFER AUTOMOTIVE: Stone Files TCPA Suit in D. South Carolina ------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Keffer Automotive Group, LLC. The case is styled as Adam Stone, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Keffer Automotive Group, LLC doing business as: Mazda of Columbia, Case No. 3:26-cv-02225-MGL (D.S.C., June 5, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Keffer Auto Group -- https://www.kefferauto.com/ -- is a new and used car dealership chain operating in the Charlotte, North Carolina region.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Paul J. Doolittle, Esq. POULIN WILLEY ANASTOPOULO LLC 32 Ann Street Charleston, SC 29403 Phone: (843) 834-4712 Email: paul.doolittle@poulinwilley.com KKR & CO: Fails to Safeguard Personal Info, Hinds Alleges --------------------------------------------------------- AARON HINDS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. KKR & CO INC. and INSTRUCTURE, INC., Defendants, Case No. 2:26-cv-00541-RJS (S.D.N.Y., June 8, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for their collective failure to properly secure and safeguard personally identifiable information ("PII") within their "Canvas" education software product, including but not limited to: Plaintiff's and Class members' names, email addresses, Student ID numbers, private messages, enrolled courses, confidential messages to teachers, and other sensitive information. Defendant Instructure, Inc. is a U.S. based education technology system best known for developing Canvas, a widely used learning management system that helps schools, universities, and organizations manage casework, assignments, and online learning from its headquarters located in Salt Lake City, Utah. Defendant KKR & Co. Inc. is a global investment firm with its headquarters located in New York, New York. The complaint relates that in the course of doing business, Canvas acquires a significant amount of highly valuable private information from its students, alumni, and staff, including the acquisition of the PII of Plaintiff and the Class members. By obtaining, collecting, using, and deriving a benefit from Plaintiff's and Class members' PII, Canvas and its parent company (KKR) as well as Instructure assumed legal and equitable duties and knew that it was responsible for ensuring the security and safety of Plaintiff's and Class members' PII to protect it from unauthorized disclosure and exfiltration. On May 1, 2026, Defendants confirmed that a breach on Canvas' database system had taken place and that Defendant first became aware of the data breach on some unknown date. The Defendants became aware of the breach because a notorious hacking group, ShinyHunters, posted on the dark web and claimed to access Canvas' database in an effort to extract sensitive information and a ransom. Due to Defendant's flawed security measures and incompetent response to the breach, Plaintiff and the Class members now face a present, substantial, and imminent risk of fraud and identity theft and must deal with that threat forever, says the suit. The Plaintiff, therefore, seeks all remedies available under the law for Defendants' negligence. Plaintiff Aaron Hinds is a former student and a graduate student at University of Denver who reasonably believes that his PII was compromised in the Data Breach.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Blake Hunter Yagman, Esq. YAGMAN PLLC 118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 444 Forest Hills, NY 1137 Telephone: (929) 709-1493 E-mail: blake.yagman@yagmanpllc.com LA PRITCHARD SUPPLY: Standing Order Entered in Bryant Class Suit ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as COLTON BRYANT, v. LA PRITCHARD SUPPLY, INC., et al. Case No. 2:26-cv-06082-AH-BFM (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Anne Hwang entered a standing order for civil cases: All counsel must immediately review and comply with the Court’s Civility and Professionalism Guidelines, available at http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/attorneys/admissions/civility-and-professionalism guidelines. Parties appearing as pro se litigants are required to comply with all Local Rules, including Local Rule 16. Magistrate Judge Referral for All Discovery Matters. All discovery matters are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Time for Filing and Hearing Motions. Motions shall be filed in accordance with Local Rules 6 and 7. This Court hears civil motions on Wednesdays, beginning at 1:30 p.m. La Pritchard is a wholesale distributor of HVAC and refrigeration equipment, parts, and supplies. A copy of the Court's order dated June 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=CcIkEs at no extra charge.[CC] LIBERTY MUTUAL: Class Certification in Summerset Due Dec. 30 ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Summerset v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Case No. 1:25-cv-11121 (D. Mass., Filed April 25, 2025), the Hon. Judge Patti B. Saris entered an order resetting deadlines as to: -- Discovery to be completed by Aug. 16, 2026 -- Class Certification and Summary Judgment Motions due by Dec. 30, 2026. The suit alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Liberty is a property and casualty insurer.[CC] LIME ROCK: Class Settlement in Chastain Suit Gets Initial Nod ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as David A. Chastain, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Lime Rock Resources Operating Company, Inc., Lime Rock Resources IV-A, L.P., LRR IV Operating, Inc., Lime Rock Resources IIIA, L.P., and LRR III Operating, Inc., Case No. 6:26-cv-00167-DES (E.D. Okla.), the Hon. Judge Snow entered an order granting preliminary approval of class action settlement, certifying the class for settlement purposes, approving form and manner of notice, and setting date for final fairness hearing -- Because this case has been settled at this stage of the proceedings, the Court does not reach, and makes no ruling either way, as to the issue of whether the Settlement Class could have been certified in this case on a contested basis. The Settlement Class is: "All non-excluded persons or entities who: (1) received late payments under the PRSA from Defendants (or Defendants' designee) for oil and gas proceeds from Oklahoma wells, or whose proceeds from Oklahoma wells were sent as unclaimed property to a government entity by the Defendants; and (2) whose proceeds did not include the statutory interest required by the PRSA." Excluded from the Settlement Class are: (1) Defendants, their affiliates, predecessors, and employees, officers, and directors; (2) agencies, departments, or instrumentalities of the United States of America or the State of Oklahoma; (3) any Indian Tribe as defined at 30 U.S.C. section 1702(4) or Indian allottee as defined at 30 U.S.C. section 1702(2); and (4) persons or entities that the Plaintiff's Counsel may be prohibited from representing under Rule 1.7 of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct. -- A final fairness hearing shall be held on Sept. 29, 2026, at 10:00 AM. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants failed to pay statutory interest on payments made outside the time periods set forth in the Production Revenue Standards Act (the "PRSA") for oil and gas production proceeds from wells in Oklahoma. Lime Rock specializes in acquiring, improving, and operating oil and gas properties across the U.S. A copy of the Court's order dated June 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=4ORWTp at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Randy C. Smith, Esq. RANDY C. SMITH, PLLC One Leadership Square 211 N. Robinson Ave., Ste. 1310 Oklahoma City, OK 73102 Telephone: (405) 641-8662 E-mail: randy@rcsmithlaw.com - and - Brady L. Smith, Esq. Harry "Skeeter" Jordan, Esq. BRADY SMITH LAW, PLLC One Leadership Square 211 N. Robinson Ave., Ste. 1320 Oklahoma City, OK 73102 Telephone: (405) 293-3029 E-mail: brady@blsmithlaw.com skeeter@blsmithlaw.com The Defendants are represented by: Fred R. Gipson, Esq. THE LAW OFFICE OF FRED R. GIPSON, PLLC 104 McSha Place Norman, OK 73072 Telephone: (405) 417-8008 E-mail: Fred.gipson@icloud.com LIV GOLF: Class Certification Filing in Haskell Due May 15, 2027 ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JAMES HASKELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. LIV GOLF INC., Case No. 1:26-cv-11787-BEM (D. Mass.), the Hon. Judge Brian E. Murphy entered a scheduling order as follows: -- Initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) and by this Court's Notice of Scheduling Conference must be completed by June 2, 2026. -- All discovery, other than expert discovery, must be completed by Dec. 14, 2026. -- A status conference will be held on Jan. 7, 2027, at 2:30 p.m. –- The Plaintiff's motion for class certification must be filed by: May 15, 2027. –- The Defendant's opposition to the motion for class certification must be filed by: June 15, 2027. –- The Plaintiff's reply in support of the motion for class certification must be filed by: June 30, 2027. The Defendant is a global professional men's golf league founded in 2021. A copy of the Court's order dated June 9, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=mzukg5 at no extra charge.[CC] LOGAN ALUMINUM: Cherry Sues Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages -------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Cherry, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. LOGAN ALUMINUM INC., Case No. 1:26-cv-00106-GNS (W.D. Ky., June 9, 2026), is brought against Defendant for its failure to pay its employees overtime wages, seeking all available relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ("FLSA") and the Kentucky Wages and Hours Act ("KWHA"). The Defendant failed to track, keep, and/or transmit the hours accurately worked each day by the Plaintiff and other similarly situated production/manufacturing employees. Defendant willfully transmitted inaccurate and/or incomplete records to payroll for compensation purposes, which do not include all work performed. The incorrect and/or incomplete records had the direct effect of reducing Defendant's labor costs to the detriment of the Plaintiff and other similarly situated production/manufacturing employees. 38. Thus, Defendant willfully did not record and pay all hours worked in violation of the FLSA and violated the FLSA's recordkeeping requirements. As result of Defendant's companywide policy and/or practice described herein, Defendant knew or had reason to know that it was not compensating the Plaintiff and other similarly situated production/manufacturing employees for all overtime hours worked, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Defendant at its facility in Russellville, Kentucky, as an hourly, non-exempt employee. The Defendant is a manufacturer and distributor of aluminum and aluminum products.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Matthew J.P. Coffman, Esq. Shannon M. Draher, Esq. Adam C. Gedling, Esq. Tristan T. Akers, Esq. COFFMAN LEGAL, LLC 1550 Old Henderson Rd., Suite #126 Columbus, OH 43220 Phone: 614-949-1181 Fax: 614-386-9964 Email: mcoffman@mcoffmanlegal.com sdraher@mcoffmanlegal.com agedling@mcoffmanlegal.com takers@mcoffmanlegal.com LP CAL OPS LLC: Reyes Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against LP Cal Ops LLC. The case is styled as Nicholas Reyes, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. LP Cal Ops LLC d/b/a LA Popular Porter Ranch, Case No. 26STCV16556 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 22, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." LP Cal Ops LLC doing business as La Popular Porter Ranch -- https://www.lapopularcdmx.com/locations/porter-ranch -- is a contemporary Mexican restaurant and cocktail bar located in The Vineyards shopping center.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason W. Rothman, Esq. BIBIYAN LAW GROUP, P.C. 1460 Westwood Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90024 Phone: 310-438-5555 Fax: 310-300-1705 Email: Jason@tomorrowlaw.com LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: Neal Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Lutheran Social Services of Northern California. The case is styled as Rebecca Ann Neal, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Too Fast, Inc., Case No. 26CV012997 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., May 29, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case." Lutheran Social Services of Northern California -- https://www.lssnorcal.org/ -- promotes stability and honors the dignity of those we serve by providing supportive housing services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Seung L. Yang, Esq. THE SENTINEL FIRM, APC 355 S. Grand Ave., Suite 1450 Los Angeles, California 90071 Phone: (213) 985-1150 Fax: (213) 985-2155 Email: seung.yang@thesentinelfirm.com MAGNITE INC: Can File Sur-reply in Opposition to Class Cert Bid --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Edward Lewis et al. v. Magnite, Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-03448-MWC-SSC (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Michelle Williams Court entered an order granting the Defendant's ex parte application for leave to file a sur-reply in opposition to the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification. The Court orders the Defendant to file its sur-reply on the docket by end of day on June 15, 2026. Because the Court prefers to rule on class certification with the benefits of complete briefing, it will allow the Defendant to file the proposed sur-reply. Since the Defendant received the Plaintiffs' reply on May 29, 2026, and the hearing date on the motion for class certification was June 12, 2026, the Defendant could not have sought its requested relief through a properly noticed motion. The Defendant asks the Court ex parte for leave to file a sur-reply to address the Plaintiffs arguments regarding belated disclosure. See generally Appl. It avers that "the Reply introduces new legal theories and arguments that were not introduced with the Plaintiffs' original moving papers," and the Defendant otherwise has no opportunity to respond. Magnite is an American online advertising technology firm. A copy of the Court's order dated June 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=yurcaR at no extra charge.[CC] MAGNUS HOLDING: Taylor Sues for Breach of Fiduciary Duty -------------------------------------------------------- BRUCE TAYLOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. YOON SOO (GENE) YOON, KEUN CHANG (KEVIN) YOON, HO YEON (AARON) LEE, DAVID E. MAHER, GREGORY HEWETT, LEANNE CUNNINGHAM, STEVEN TISHMAN, JAN SINGER, MAGNUS HOLDINGS CO., LTD., MISTO HOLDINGS CORPORATION (f/k/a FILA HOLDINGS CORP.), Defendants, and, ACUSHNET HOLDINGS CORP. Nominal Defendant, Case No. 2026-0774 (Chancery Ct, Del, June 11, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for breaching their fiduciary duties of loyalty and care owed to Acushnet and its minority stockholders; and against Magnus Holdings Co., Ltd. and Misto Holdings Corporation as the Company's controlling stockholder and for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty. The complaint alleges that Acushnet's controlling stockholder, Magnus, has exploited its influence over Acushnet's Board to cause the Company to enter into a series of stock repurchase agreements. The Defendants are also using the Company's treasury to ensure Magnus' voting control does not fall below the 50% threshold for the benefit of Magnus and the Magnus Director Defendants, and have failed to protect the value of the Company or ability to obtain a control premium for the benefit of the Company and its public stockholders. The Board has acted disloyally and in bad faith by knowingly failing to advance the best interests of the Company and its minority stockholders by approving the Magnus Repurchases for the benefit of Magnus and the Magnus Director Defendants and to the detriment of the Company and its public stockholders. The Board's actions are unreasonable and were therefore made without requisite care. Each member of the Board, thus, faces a substantial likelihood of liability, adds the complaint. The Plaintiff, therefore, demands judgment and permanent relief, including injunctive relief, in his favor and in favor of the Class. Plaintiff Bruce Taylor is currently, and was at all relevant times, a beneficial owner of Acushnet common stock. Defendants are all eight members of the current Board. Nominal Defendant Acushnet Holdings Corp. is the parent of Acushnet Company, the maker of Titleist golf balls and clubs, FootJoy golf shoes and apparel, and other premium golf brands.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kimberly A. Evans, Esq. Irene R. Lax, Esq. BLOCK & LEVITON LLP 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1120 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 499-3600 E-mail: kim@blockleviton.com s irene@blockleviton.com MAGPUL INDUSTRIES: Website Inaccessible to Blind Users, Bishop Says ------------------------------------------------------------------- CEDRIC BISHOP, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs v. MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP., Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-04979 (S.D.N.Y., June 11, 2026) is a civil rights action against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its interactive website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons, in violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Defendant MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP. operates the Magpul online retail store, as well as the Magpul interactive Website that provides consumers with access to an array of goods and services including information about Defendant's firearm accessories, apparel and merch, as well as other types of goods, pricing, terms of service, refund, privacy policies and internet pricing specials. During Plaintiff's visits to the Website, the last occurring on May 6, 2026, in an attempt to purchase a Magpul Unfair Advantage CVC T-Shirt from Defendant and to view the information on the Website, Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers that denied Plaintiff a shopping experience similar to that of a sighted person and full and equal access to the goods and services offered to the public and made available to the public. Due to the inaccessibility of Defendant's Website, blind and visually-impaired consumers such as Plaintiff, who need screen-readers, cannot fully and equally use or enjoy the goods, and services Defendant offers to the public on its Website, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. Plaintiff CEDRIC BISHOP is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Telephone: 212-228-9795 Facsimile: 212-982-6284 E-mail: Jeffrey@Gottlieb.legal Dana@Gottlieb.legal Michael@Gottlieb.legal MAH GROUP: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Wilson Due Sept. 28 -------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as WILSON v. MAH GROUP, INC., Case No. 6:25-cv-00855 (D. Or., Filed May 19, 2025), the Hon. Judge Mustafa T Kasubhai entered an order granting the Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension: Rebuttal expert disclosures are due no later than August 26, 2026. Discovery shall be completed no later than August 27, 2026. Dispositive motions and motion for class certification are due September 28, 2026. Joint ADR Report and Pretrial Order are due 30 days after dispositive motions are ruled on, or October 28, 2026, if none are filed. The suit alleges violatioh of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Mah was founded in 1976. The company's line of business includes operating of bars, night clubs, and other locations that sell alcoholic drinks.[CC] MANOS HOME CARE INC: Jones Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Manos Home Care, Inc. The case is styled as Cherri Lanice Jones, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. Manos Home Care, Inc. d/b/a Manos, Case No. 26CV190012 (Cal. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty., May 22, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." Manos Home Care, Inc. doing business as Manos -- https://www.manoshomecare.com/ -- offers reliable, bilingual in-home and community-based care for people with disabilities in Northern California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. LAVI EBRAHIMIAN, LLP 8889 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: (310) 432-0000 Email: jlavi@lelawfirm.com MARUGAME UDON USA: Cruz Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Marugame Udon USA LLC. The case is styled as Jose Cruz, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Marugame Udon USA LLC, Case No. 26STCV17131 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 29, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." Marugame Udon outside of Japan -- https://www.marugameudon.com/ -- is a Japanese fast-casual restaurant chain specializing in udon.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Seung L. Yang, Esq. THE SENTINEL FIRM, APC 355 S. Grand Ave., Suite 1450 Los Angeles, California 90071 Phone: (213) 985-1150 Fax: (213) 985-2155 Email: seung.yang@thesentinelfirm.com MASSACHUSETTS: Settlement Class Gets Certification -------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ROBERT WRIGHT et al., v. ROBERT GOLDSTEIN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Case No. 3:22-cv-11936-MGM (D. Mass.), the Hon. Judge Mastroianni entered an amended order approving settlement agreement and certification of settlement class as follows: 1. The proposed class is permanently certified as a settlement class pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e), comprised of: "All persons who have or have had the COVID Exposure Notification Setting—known alternatively as "MassNotify v.3," "Exposure Notification Settings Feature-MA," and "Massachusetts Department of Public Health"-on their Android Devices from March 18, 2021, until May 11, 2023. 2. The Court appoints Margaret Little, of the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), as class counsel. 3. The Court does not retain jurisdiction to enforce and modify the Settlement Agreement and resolve any disputes that arise in connection therewith. Instead, the terms of the Settlement Agreement may be enforced in a State court action, as set forth in the Agreement. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health promotes and protects health and wellness and prevents injury and illness for all people. A copy of the Court's order dated June 9, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=8Olc0E at no extra charge.[CC] MAULDIN & JENKINS: Brunetti Files Suit in N.D. Georgia ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC. The case is styled as Anthony S. Brunetti, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Fairmont Federal Credit Union, Case No. 1:26-cv-02885-AT (N.D. Ga., May 22, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract for Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Mauldin & Jenkins -- https://www.mjcpa.com/ -- is an accounting company that provides audit, accounting, and tax services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Casondra Turner, Esq. MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC 800 S. Gay ST, Ste. 1100 Knoxville, TN 37929 Phone: (866) 252-0878 Email: cturner@milberg.com - and - Spencer Davis Campbell, Esq. MARKOVITS, STOCK & DEMARCO, LLC 119 E. Court Street, Suite 530 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Phone: (513) 651-3700 Fax: (513) 665-0219 Email: scampbell@msdlegal.com MAULDIN & JENKINS: Niessing Files Suit in E.D. Missouri ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC. The case is styled as Raymond Niessing, Joseph Wheeler, Joseph Corbray, Stephanie Jones, Sharyn Anne Limbos Vadla, Shirley Cleveland, Grace Ayandibu, Susan Stone, Ernest Easter, Jason Spangler, P.B., a minor, through her next Friend Stephanie Jaffa, Stephanie Jaffa, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Fairont Federal Credit Union, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, St. Anthony's Physician Organization Hospitalist Services L.C., One Community Health, Case No. 4:26-md-03185-JAR (E.D. Mo., June 5, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Mauldin & Jenkins -- https://www.mjcpa.com/ -- is an accounting company that provides audit, accounting, and tax services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jessica Andrea Wilkes, Esq. William Bernard Federman, Esq. FEDERMAN AND SHERWOOD 10205 N. Pennsylvania Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Phone: (405) 235-1560 Fax: (405) 239-2112 Email: jaw@federmanlaw.com wbf@federmanlaw.com - and - Maureen M. Brady, Esq. MCSHANE AND BRADY LLC 4006 Central Street Kansas City, MO 64111 Phone: (816) 888-8010 Email: mbrady@mcshanebradylaw.com - and - Raina C. Borrelli, Esq. STRAUSS BORRELLI PLLC 980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: (872) 263-1100 Fax: (872) 263-1109 Email: raina@straussborrelli.com - and - Evan D. Buxner, Esq. EVAN D BUXNER LLC 230 S. Bemiston Avenue, Suite 1400 St. Louis, MO 63105 Phone: (314) 863-6000 Email: ebuxner@buxnerlaw.com - and - Gerald D. Wells, III, Esq. LYNCH CARPENTER LLP - Philadelphia 1760 Market Street, Suite 600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Phone: (267) 609-6910 Fax: (267) 609-6955 Email: jerry@lcllp.com - and - Amber Love Schubert, Esq. SCHUBERT AND JONCKHEER LLP 2001 Union Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone: (415) 788-4220 Fax: (415) 788-0161 Email: aschubert@sjk.law - and - Anthony Parkhill, Esq. BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES PC 205 W. Randolph Street, Suite 1630 Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: (312) 621-2000 Email: aparkhill@barnowlaw.com - and - John S. Steward, Esq. STEWARD LAW FIRM LLC 14824 West Clayton Road, Suite 24 St. Louis, MO 63017 Phone: (314) 504-0979 Fax: (314) 594-5950 Email: js@molawgroup.com The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason K. Fagelman, Esq. Joseph Simmons, Esq. NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP - Dallas 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600 Dallas, TX 75201 Phone: (214) 855-8120 Email: jason.fagelman@nortonrosefulbright.com joseph.simmons@nortonrosefulbright.com - and - Luke G. Maher, Esq. NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP - St. Louis 8001 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 800 St. Louis, MO 63105 Phone: (314) 505-8829 Fax: (314) 505-8899 Email: luke.maher@nortonrosefulbright.com - and - Haley Kathleen Dierks, Esq. Shane Chapman, Esq. LASHLY AND BAER PC - St. Louis 714 Locust Street St. Louis, MO 63101-1699 Phone: (720) 687-9966 Email: hdierks@lashlybaer.com schapman@lashlybaer.com - and - Brendan M. Tyler, Esq. Mindy Beth Pava, Esq. FELDESMAN LLP 1129 20th Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 466-8960 Email: btyler@feldesman.com mpava@feldesman.com MERCADO LA PRINCESA: Magdaleno Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Mercado La Princesa, Inc. The case is styled as Laura E. Magdaleno, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Mercado La Princesa, Inc., Case No. 26CV002922 (Cal. Super. Ct., Monterey Cty., May 29, 2026). The case type is stated as "Civil Unlimited." Mercado La Princesa, Inc. -- https://www.laprincesamarket.net/ -- is a popular chain of Hispanic and international supermarkets.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: James C. Huber, Esq. Bryce M. Van De Moere, Esq. GLOBAL LEGAL LAW FIRM 322 Encinitas Blvd, Suite 200 Encinitas, CA 92024 Fax: (888) 846-8902 Phone: (888) 846-8901 Email: jhuber@attorneygl.com bvandemoere@attorneygl.com MONEYKEY INCORPORATED: Riley Files FCRA Suit in D. Arizona ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against MoneyKey Incorporated. The case is styled as Wendy Riley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. MoneyKey Incorporated, Case No. 2:26-cv-03833-CDB (D. Ariz., May 29, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. MoneyKey -- https://www.moneykey.com/ -- is an online direct lender that provides short-term, unsecured Loans and Lines of Credit to underserved consumers through a safe and secure platform.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: David James McGlothlin, Esq. KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 3240 E. Union Hills Drive, Suite 105 Phoenix, AZ 85050 Phone: (800) 400-6808 Email: david@kazlg.com - and - Ryan Lee McBride, Esq. KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 2221 Camino Del Rio S., Suite 101 San Diego, CA 92108 Phone: (800) 400-6808 Email: ryan@kazlg.com MOSES STANCIL: Cary Loses Class Certification Bid ------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ARNOLD A. CARY, also known as Tony, SAGE N. GRAY, also known as Nathan, and RYAN FLINT, v. MOSES STANCIL, SHANE STUCKER, and KATARINA CALCAGNO, Case No. 1:26-cv-02543-RTG (D. Colo.), the Hon. Judge Lewis T. Babcock entered an order: -- Denying the Plaintiffs' request to certify a class action, -- Denying permissive joinder, and -- Dismissing without prejudice all the Plaintiffs except the Plaintiff Arnold A. Cary, and allowing the dismissed Plaintiffs to initiate separate actions if they choose. The Clerk of the Court shall mail to each dismissed Plaintiff a copy of this Order. Each dismissed Plaintiff may obtain and must utilize the Court-approved Prisoner Complaint and Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915 forms (with the assistance of his case manager or the facility’s legal assistant), along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov, if they seek to initiate new separate actions. The Prisoner Motion for Appointment of Counsel is denied without prejudice as premature because this action is an initial review. Because the putative class representatives are proceeding pro se, the Court finds that class certification is inappropriate. The Court finds that permissive joinder should not be allowed because, for the most part, their claims arise from different factual backgrounds. Even if some of the claims arise from the same factual background, the impracticalities inherent in multiple plaintiff prisoner cases listed above make joinder of claims inappropriate in this case The Plaintiffs, who are not represented by counsel, seek to proceed as class representatives for a class of: "[a]ll current and future prisoner in the custody of the CDOC who have been or will be diagnosed with MSRA and/or fungal infections." A copy of the Court's order dated June 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=q1zOOm at no extra charge.[CC] MUENSTER MILLING: Rendon Suit Removed to C.D. California -------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Isabel Rendon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Muenster Milling Company LLC doing business as: www.muensterpet.com, Case No. 26STCV12853 was removed from the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on May 28, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-06175-GW-BFM to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Statutory Actions. Muenster Milling Company LLC -- https://muensterpet.com/ -- is a 4th-generation, family-owned pet food manufacturer, specializes in producing innovative extruded dog food, cat food, and horse feed.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott J. Ferrell, Esq. Victoria C. Knowles, Esq. PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS APC 4100 Newport Place Drive Suite 800 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: (949) 706-6464 Fax: (949) 706-6469 Email: sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com vknowles@pacifictrialattorneys.com The Defendants are represented by: Theresa C. Becerra, Esq. SPENCER FANE LLP 201 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 550 Santa Monica, CA 90401-2214 Phone: (424) 217-1830 Fax: (424) 217-1854 Email: tbecerra@spencerfane.com MYUNG GA TOFU: Ko Seeks Conditional Collective Certification ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as ASEONG KO, on behalf of himself And others similarly situated, v. MYUNG GA TOFU & BBQ RESTAURANT OF FLORIDA, INC., d/b/a MYUNG GA TOFU & BARBEQUE, COREAN FOOD WESTON, LLC, and DONG HYUN KIM a/k/a NICKY KIM, Case No. 0:26-cv-60842-DMM (S.D. Fla.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order: (i) conditionally certifying a collective of: "all current and former servers who worked for MYUNG GA TOFU & BBQ RESTAURANT OF FLORIDA, INC., d/b/a MYUNG GA TOFU & BARBEQUE ("Myung Ga"), at any time during any workweek in the past three-year period and who were compensated, in whole or in part, through tips"; (ii) directing Defendant to produce to undersigned counsel within 14 days of the Order granting this Motion a list containing the names, the last known addresses, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses of putative class members within the defined collective; (iii) authorizing undersigned counsel to send notice, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to all individuals whose names appear on the list produced by the Defendant's counsel by first-class mail, e-mail, and text-message; (iv) providing all individuals whose names appear on the list produced by the Defendant with 60 days from the date the notices are initially mailed to file a Consent to Become Opt-In Plaintiff, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C; and (v) authorizing undersigned counsel to send a single reminder notice, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, 30 days after issuance of the initial Notice to those putative collective members who have not yet returned a Consent to Become Opt-in Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Plaintiff submits that he has met his burden of demonstrating a reasonable basis to believe that similarly situated employees exist and were subject to the Defendant's common compensation and tip-distribution policies, such that conditional certification and issuance of Court-authorized notice are appropriate. Myung Ga is a staple Korean restaurant. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated June 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=qawzaz at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jeanie Kang, Esq. JKANG LEGAL, P.A. 114 Pauls Drive Brandon, FL 33511 Telephone: (813) 252-0822 E-mail:Jeanie.Kang@JKangLegal.com NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DE: Vick Files Suit in Del. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against New Castle County, et al. The case is styled as Alexander J. Vick, Joseph Jamison, Laura Jamison, Lindsay Vick, and on behalf of all other similarly situated v. New Castle County, New Castle County PD, Officer Merrell, John Doe, Case No. N26C-05-285 KMV (Del. Super. Ct., New Castle Cty., May 29, 2026). The case type is stated as "Civil Miscellaneous." New Castle County -- https://www.newcastlede.gov/ -- is the northernmost of the three counties of the U.S. state of Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Christofer C. Johnson, Esq. THE JOHNSON FIRM, LLC. Independence Mall 1601 Concord Pike, Suite 100 Wilmington, DE 19803 Phone: (302) 397-3988 Fax: (302) 472-4930 Email: chris@johnsonfirmllc.com NEW DAWN NURSING: Wright Sues Over Unpaid Compensations ------------------------------------------------------- Heidi Wright, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. NEW DAWN NURSING LLC d/b/a NEW DAWN REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER and DAVID OBERLANDER, Case No. 5:26-cv-01332 (N.D. Ohio, June 9, 2026), is brought challenging policies and practices of Defendants that violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") as a result of unpaid compensations. The Defendants systematically deducted meal breaks despite requiring employees to work through them and failed to pay employees one-and one-half times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked. The Defendants had a policy and practice of automatically deducting 30-minute unpaid meal breaks from employees' time worked, including Plaintiff and others similarly situated. As a result, the Defendants knowingly deprived Plaintiff and similarly situated non-exempt employees of regular and overtime pay, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was jointly employed by Defendants as a State Tested Nursing Assistant from late 2023 through 2024. New Dawn Nursing LLC owned and operated its business, a skilled nursing care and rehabilitation facility known as New Dawn Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott D. Perlmuter, Esq. TITTLE & PERLMUTER 4106 Bridge Avenue Cleveland, OH 44113 Phone: 216-308-1522 Fax: 888-604-9299 Email: scott@tittlelawfirm.com NIAGEN BIOSCIENCE: Hart Sues Over Deceptive NR Supplements Ads -------------------------------------------------------------- CARYN HART, CLARE ERSLEV, and ANISE IVEY, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. NIAGEN BIOSCIENCE, INC. and CHROMADEX, INC., Case No. 3:26-cv-03572-CAB-DEB (S.D. Cal., June 16, 2026) is a class action brought on behalf of consumers who purchased Defendants' Tru Niagen nicotinamide riboside (NR) dietary supplements. According to the complaint, "Snake oil" salesmen scams are some of the oldest tricks in the book. Exploitative scammers and businesses sell "cure all" products that prey on the anxieties of vulnerable consumers. The Defendants' Products are the newest iteration of this age-old scheme and promise youthful vitality through its Products. Specifically, the Defendants' advertising claims that the Products are "clinically proven" to increase NAD+ levels within two weeks of daily use, and that the Products provide actual benefits for anti-aging, cellular repair, and organ health, among other claims. By stating in their marketing that the Products are "clinically proven" to provide these benefits, Defendants overstate and misrepresent clinical findings about the Products and their health benefits and falsely represent to the ordinary consumer that the Products have been proven through rigorous scientific testing to actually provide these health outcomes. The Defendants' false and deceptive advertising form a pattern of unlawful and unfair business practices that harm the public and violate consumer protection laws, the suit contends. The Defendants are capitalizing on the newest health movement, "bio hacking," which is the practice of using diet, health data tracking, and supplements to increase one's maximum lifespan and longevity in order to sell the Products and exploit vulnerable consumers' anxieties about their health declining as they age. One of the hottest new trends promulgated by bio-hackers is seeking to increase their levels of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ("NAD+"), a vital coenzyme found in the body's cells that help the body convert food into energy and repair our cellular DNA. The Defendants' marketing campaign for the Products centers around the claim that the Products are "clinically proven" to significantly increase NAD+ levels and claim that the Products provide support for anti-aging, vitality, cognitive health, cardiovascular health, immune health, muscle recovery, cellular repair, and energy improving benefits, the suit further asserts. Plaintiff Caryn Hart last purchased Tru Niagen 300mg 30 ct. from Sprouts Farmers Market in Encinitas, California in May 2026 for $44.99 plus tax. Plaintiff Clare Erslev is a citizen of Maryland and resides in Silver Spring, Maryland. Plaintiff last purchased Tru Niagen 300mg 90 ct. in Silver Spring, Maryland directly from Defendants' website in September 2025 for $101.60. 20. Plaintiff Anise Ivey is a citizen of Arizona and resides in Mesa, Arizona. Plaintiff last purchased Tru Niagen 300mg. 30 ct. in Mesa, Arizona from Amazon.com in November 2025 for $40.20. Niagen manufactures, markets, distributes, advertises, and sells the Products in the United States, including in California and in this District, through brick-and-mortar stores and throughout numerous retailers online.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Laurence D. King, Esq. Matthew B. George, Esq. Blair E. Reed, Esq. Sophia V. Pintar, Esq. KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1501 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (415) 772-4700 Facsimile: (415) 772-4707 E-mail: lking@kaplanfox.com mgeorge@kaplanfox.com breed@kaplanfox.com spintar@kaplanfox.com NIKE INC: Class Cert Bid Filing in Ma Suit Due June 11, 2027 ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as HARRISON MA, v. NIKE, INC., Case No. 2:25-cv-01235-JLR (W.D. Wash.), the Hon. Judge Robart entered a scheduling order regarding class certification motion as follows: Class certification fact discovery close on: Feb. 8, 2027 Class certification expert discovery May 12, 2027 closes on: The Plaintiff's motion for class June 11, 2027 certification: The Defendant's response and any Daubert July 26, 2027 motions: The Plaintiff's reply and response to any Aug. 25, 2027 Daubert motions: The Defendant's Daubert reply: Sept. 9, 2027 Nike, Inc. is an American athletic footwear and apparel corporation. A copy of the Court's order dated June 9, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=tZPIOh at no extra charge.[CC] NIKE INC: Final Pretrial Order Entered in Cahill Class Suit ----------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Cahill et al., v. Nike, Inc., Case No. 3:18-cv-01477-AB (D. Or.), the Hon. Judge Amy M. Baggio entered a final pretrial order as follows: -- The Parties previously marked a substantial portion of the potential trial evidence as confidential or attorneys' eyes only. The Protective Order provides that a designating party "may exclude from the room any person, other than persons designated in paragraphs 7 and 8, as appropriate, for that portion of the deposition, hearing or pre-trial proceeding" if it designates material "Confidential" or "Attorneys' Eyes Only" (AEO). The Protective Order is silent on trial matters, including sealing the courtroom, limiting public access during trial testimony, or any other trial-specific mechanism. -- The Parties have agreed that, as soon as they have completed identifying any potential trial exhibits, each Party will inform the other of what, if any, documents they want to keep confidential or AEO, along with a proposal on how to handle these designations at trial. The Parties will then meet and confer to see what agreements they can reach, and if there are documents for which the Parties do not reach a resolution that either Party seeks to keep marked confidential or AEO for trial- related purposes, the designating Party will file a motion by June 8, 2026 justifying those designations, along with a proposal on how to address the related issues for trial. Plaintiff's Position: The Plaintiff brings each of the claims below individually and on behalf of the putative class of women employed at NIKE World Headquarters, as defined in the Second Amended Complaint. The Pretrial Order amends the pleadings and controls the subsequent course of this action. The Court has the authority to grant or deny class certification at any time before final judgment, and an order denying class certification may be altered or amended before final judgment. Nike's position: This trial will determine the claims of a single plaintiff, Heather Hender. No class claims are being tried and any evidence or argument that Plaintiff attempts to present during trial in support of class claims that are not at issue in the trial would be improper and unduly prejudicial. In November 2022, Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation, recommending that class certification be denied after she monitored two years of discovery, including multiple extensions, on a complete record of 600 pages of briefing, 2,000 pages of expert reports, nearly 3,500 pages of evidence, and 43 employee declarations. NIKE disagrees with Plaintiff's assertion that this "decision relied on an incomplete and misleading record. In this employment discrimination action, Plaintiff Heather Hender alleges sex discrimination claims related to pay and promotions against NIKE. NIKE employed Heather Hender at NIKE World Headquarters from April 6, 2015 through Oct. 12, 2020. Nike is an American athletic footwear and apparel corporation. A copy of the Court's order dated June 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=jfrSBA at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendant is represented by: Byron Goldstein, Esq. Barry Goldstein, Esq. GOLDSTEIN BROWNE, PC 1111 Broadway, Office 04-117 Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 584-9020 E-mail: byron@goldsteinbrowne.com barry@goldsteinbrowne.com - and - Laura Salerno Owens, Esq. David B. Markowitz, Esq. Harry B. Wilson, Esq. Kathryn P. Roberts, Esq. MARKOWITZ HERBOLD PC 1455 SW Broadway, Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: (503) 295-3085 E-mail: LauraSalerno@MarkowitzHerbold.com DavidMarkowitz@MarkowitzHerbold.com HarryWilson@MarkowitzHerbold.com KathrynRoberts@MarkowitzHerbold.com - and - Craig J. Ackermann, Esq. Brian Denlinger, Esq. Erika Smolyar, Esq. ACKERMANN & TILAJEF, P.C 315 South Beverly Drive, Suite 504 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: (310) 277-0614 Facsimile: (310) 277-0635 E-mail: cja@ackermanntilajef.com bd@ackermanntilajef.com es@ackermanntilajef.com - and - Laura L. Ho, Esq. James Kan, Esq. Katharine L. Fisher, Esq. DARDARIAN, HO, KAN & LEE 155 Grand Avenue, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 763-9800 Facsimile: (510) 835-1417 E-mail: lho@dhkl.law jkan@dhkl.law kfisher@dhkl.law - and - Daniel Prince, Esq. Felicia A. Davis, Esq. Lindsey C. Jackson, Esq. PAUL HASTINGS LLP 515 South Flower Street, Twenty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228 Telephone: (213) 683-6000 Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 E-mail: danielprince@paulhastings.com feliciadavis@paulhastings.com lindseyjackson@paulhastings.com - and - Laura E. Rosenbaum, Esq. STOEL RIVES LLP 760 SW Ninth Avenue, Suite 3000 Portland, OR 97205 Telephone: (503) 224-3380 Facsimile: (503) 220-2480 E-mail: Laura.rosenbaum@stoel.com NOW OPTICS LLC: Lucio Files TCPA Suit in E.D. California -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Now Optics, LLC. The case is styled as David Lucio, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Now Optics, LLC doing business as: Stanton Optical, Case No. 1:26-at-02408 (E.D. Cal., June 9, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Now Optics, LLC doing business as Stanton Optical -- https://www.stantonoptical.com/ -- provide easy eye care and offers prescription eyeglasses, sunglasses & contacts.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott A. Edelsberg, I, Esq. EDELSBERG LAW PA 1925 Century Park E, Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (305) 975-3320 Email: scott@edelsberglaw.com NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS: Ozuna Suit Removed to E.D. Washington ----------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Eluterio Ozuna, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. 26-2-01477-39 was removed from the Superior Court of Washington in and for Yakima County, to the United States District Court for Eastern District of Washington on June 5, 2026, and assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-03111-TOR. The Complaint asserted a variety of putative class claims, including but not limited to failure to provide rest breaks; failure to provide meal periods; failure to pay overtime; unpaid wages; failure to accrue and allow use of sick leave; improper wage deductions; failure to pay wages due at termination; and willful refusal to pay wages. Additionally, the Complaint sought double damages, attorneys' fees and costs, and both pre- and post-judgment interest.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Douglas Han, Esq. Shunt Tatavos-Gharajeh, Esq. Dean Petitta, Esq. JUSTICE LAW CORPORATION 1215 4th Ave., Suite 1630 Seattle, WA 98101 Email: dhan@justicelawcorp.com stavos@justicelawcorp.com dpetitta@justicelawcorp.com The Defendants are represented by: Devin Smith, WSBA #42219 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 999 Third Avenue, Suite 4700 Seattle, WA 98104-4041 Phone: (206) 946-4910 Email: devinsmith@seyfarth.com NUVANCE HEALTH: Rose Files Suit for Breach of Fiduciary Duty ------------------------------------------------------------ TAYLOR ROSE and SUSAN MOLINE, on behalf of the Nuvance Health 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries, Plaintiffs v. NUVANCE HEALTH, INC., and NORTHWELL HEALTH, INC., Defendants, Case No. 3:26-cv-00925 (D. Conn., June 10, 2026) is a class action seeking to protect the retirement savings of current and former Nuvance employees who participated in the Plan. The complaint relates that Nuvance is administering a billion-dollar defined-contribution plan with institutional leverage and corresponding fiduciary obligations. Nuvance entered an affiliation agreement with Northwell Health, Inc., on February 28, 2024, and the parties closed on May 1, 2025. The May 1, 2025 closing changed Nuvance's corporate control. It did not merge the Plan. After closing, Northwell, Inc. became the sole corporate member of Northwell Health System, Inc. As a result, Northwell Health System, Inc. became Nuvance Health's parent company. The Plan's financial statements identify Northwell, Inc. as Northwell's ultimate sole corporate member. Nuvance remains the Plan sponsor and continues to operate the Plan. According to the complaint, both Nuvance and Northwell are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act for their own conduct and roles. Nuvance is liable for its fiduciary conduct before and after the May 1, 2025 closing. Northwell is liable to the extent it exercised fiduciary authority or control after closing, appointed or monitored Plan fiduciaries, participated in or enabled ongoing breaches, failed to remedy breaches it had power to correct, or assumed or succeeded to relevant Nuvance benefit-plan obligations. However, Nuvance breached its fiduciary duties to the Plan. First, it failed to follow the Plan's mandatory order for forfeitures. The Plan required forfeitures to pay Plan expenses before they reduced Nuvance's contributions. Nuvance reversed that order. Second, Nuvance permitted collection of excessive recordkeeping compensation from the Plan and its participants. As a result, Plaintiffs paid recordkeeping fees before and after the May 1, 2025 closing that should have been paid by forfeitures, the complaint says. Nuvance is responsible for its own conduct throughout. Northwell is responsible only for post-closing losses if it controlled, approved, continued, knowingly participated in, or failed to remedy the challenged practices, or if transaction documents, governance documents, Plan documents, or applicable successor-liability principles show that Northwell or a Northwell-controlled entity assumed, succeeded to, or became responsible for relevant Nuvance benefit-plan obligations, adds the suit. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs seek restoration of Plan losses disgorgement of contribution savings and other gains, surcharge, a full accounting, removal of breaching fiduciaries, reform of Plan practices, and all other equitable relief necessary to restore the Plan to the position it would have occupied had Defendants complied with ERISA and the Plan. Plaintiff Taylor Rose is a current participant in the Plan within the meaning of ERISA. Plaintiff Susan Moline is a former participant in the Plan within the meaning of ERISA. Defendants are the Plan sponsors.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Ephraim J. Fink, Esq. MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. 157 Church St 19th Floor New Haven, CT 06510 Telephone: (475) 204-3101 Cellphone: (203) 918-0263 E-mail: ephraim.fink@forthepeople.com - and - Marc R. Edelman, Esq. MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. 201 North Franklin Street, Suite 700 Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: (813) 577-4722 Facsimile: (813) 257-0572 E-mail: medelman@forthepeople.com - and - Michael McKay, Esq. MCKAY LAW, LLC 5635 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 170 Scottsdale, AZ 85250 Telephone: (480) 681-7000 E-mail: mmckay@mckaylaw.us - and - Luisa A. Cabassa, Esq. Amanda E. Heystek, Esq. WENZEL FENTON CABASSA, P.A. 1110 North Florida Ave., Suite 300 Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: (813) 337-7992 Facsimile: (813) 229-8712 E-mail: bhill@wfclaw.com E-mail: lcabassa@wfclaw.com E-mail: aheystek@wfclaw.com ON INC: Norberg Files Suit in D. Oregon --------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against On Inc. The case is styled as Linda Norberg, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. On Inc., Case No. 3:26-cv-01035-MO (D. Ore., May 22, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other Statutory Actions. On Inc. (On Holding AG) -- https://www.on.com/ -- is a Swiss athletic shoe and performance sportswear company that designs and markets sports clothing and running shoes.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brady H. Mertz, Esq. BRADY MERTZ, PC 685 Church St. NE Salem, OR 97302 Phone: (503) 385-0212 Fax: (503) 375-2218 Email: brady@bradymertz.com - and - Rick Klingbeil, Esq. RICK KLINGBEIL, PC Portland, OR 97232 Phone: (503) 473-8565 Fax: (503) 427-9001 Email: rick@klingbeil-law.com OSHKOSH CORP: Fountain Valley Suit Transferred to E.D. Wisconsin ---------------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as City of Fountain Valley, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Oshkosh Corporation, et al., Case No. 8:26-cv-01246 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on June 10, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-00973-WCG to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Anti-Trust for Antitrust Litigation. Oshkosh Corporation -- https://www.oshkoshcorp.com/ -- formerly Oshkosh Truck, is an American industrial company that designs and builds specialty trucks, military vehicles, truck bodies.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Michael E. Klenov, Esq. KOREIN TILLERY LLC 505 N 7th St-Ste 3600 St. Louis, MO 63101 Phone: (314) 241-4844 Email: mklenov@koreintillery.com The Defendants are represented by: Jason K. Fagelman, Esq. Joseph E. Simmons, PHV NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP - Dallas 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600 Dallas, TX 75201 Phone: (214) 855-8120 Email: jason.fagelman@nortonrosefulbright.com joseph.simmons@nortonrosefulbright.com PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS: Sanchez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Pilot Travel Centers LLC. The case is styled as Norma Patricia Sanchez, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Pilot Travel Centers LLC d/b/a Pilot Flying J, Case No. STK-CV-UOE-2026-0005400 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., June 11, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Commercial/Business Tort (Not Fraud/ Breach Of Contract) (General Jurisdiction)." Pilot Travel Centers LLC doing business as Pilot Flying J -- https://pilotcompany.com/ -- is North America's largest network of travel centers and truck stops.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: James R. Hawkins, Esq. JAMES HAWKINS APLC 9880 Research Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92318 Phone: (949) 387-7200 Fax: (949) 387-6676 PLAZA HOME MORTGAGE: Regehr Files Suit in S.D. California --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc. The case is styled as Nathan Regehr, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc., Case No. 3:26-cv-03476-H-MMP (S.D. Cal., June 9, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Breach of Contract. Plaza Home Mortgage -- https://www.plazahomemortgage.com/ -- offers conventional fixed rate, conventional ARM, FHA, and VA loans.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ray Sebastian Seilie, Esq. KINSELLA HOLLEY ISER KUMP STEINSAPIR LLP 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 750 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Phone: (310) 566-9800 Fax: (310) 566-9850 Email: rseilie@khiks.com PRESTIGE CONSUMER: Harris Suit Removed to C.D. California --------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Bria Harris, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Prestige Consumer Healthcare, Inc., C.B. Fleet Company, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. 26STCV14114 was removed from the Superior Court of Los Angeles, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on June 9, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-06264 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. -- https://www.prestigebrands.com/ -- is an American company that markets and distributes over-the-counter healthcare and household cleaning products.[BN] The Plaintiff appears pro se. The Defendants are represented by: Anthony J. Anscombe, Esq. STEPTOE LLP One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower, Suite 1070 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: (415) 365-6700 Fax: (415) 365-6699 Email: aanscombe@steptoe.com - and - Melanie Atswei Ayerh, Esq. STEPTOE LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: (213) 439-9400 Fax: (213) 439-9599 Email: mayerh@steptoe.com QSI LLC: Webb Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against QSI, LLC. The case is styled as Frederick Webb, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. QSI, LLC. Case No. 26STCV18051 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., June 8, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." QSI -- https://www.qsillc.com/ -- specializes in operations, maintenance, and support services for large government contracts.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. LAVI EBRAHIMIAN, LLP 8889 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: (310) 432-0000 Email: jlavi@lelawfirm.com RETAIL SERVICES: Fails to Safeguard Personal Info, Reaume Says -------------------------------------------------------------- THERESA REAUME, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. RETAIL SERVICES WIS CORPORATION d/b/a WIS INTERNATIONAL INC. d/b/a DEALER SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant, Case No. 4:26-cv-00620 (E.D. Tex., June 9, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to properly secure and safeguard Plaintiff's and Class Members' personally identifiable information ("PII") from criminal hackers, resulting in a data breach. The complaint relates that in the ordinary course of receiving services and/or employment from Defendant, Plaintiff and Class Members were required to provide their Private Information to Defendant. On May 16, 2026, Defendant reported to the Office of the Vermont Attorney General that it had experienced a data breach impacting Social Security numbers. The total number of persons impacted is currently unknown at this time. The Data Breach exposed other forms of highly confidential PII, such as financial information, names, addresses, insurance information, driver's licenses, government IDs, and/or passports (together, with Social Security numbers, "Private Information"). The Defendant has not yet mailed individual notice to all individuals impacted by the Data Breach. The Plaintiff and Class Members have likely suffered and are at an imminent, immediate, and continuing increased risk of suffering, ascertainable losses in the form of harm from identity theft and other fraudulent misuse of their Private Information, the loss of the benefit of their bargain, out-of-pocket expenses incurred to remedy or mitigate the effects of the Data Breach, and the value of their time reasonably incurred to remedy or mitigate the effects of the Data Breach, says the suit. The Plaintiff and Class members seek injunctive or other equitable relief to ensure Defendant hereinafter adequately safeguards Private Information by implementing reasonable security procedures and practices. Defendant Retail Services WIS Corporation d/b/a WIS International Inc. d/b/a Dealer Solutions, Inc. is the world's largest inventory service provider and offers comprehensive capabilities from full-service inventory management to advanced self-service solutions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Leanna A. Loginov, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, P.A. 14 NE 1st Ave, Suite 705 Miami, FL 33132 Telephone: (305) 479-2299 E-mail: lloginov@shamisgentile.com SAILY INC: Blind Users Face Barriers to Website Access, Senior Says ------------------------------------------------------------------- FRANK SENIOR, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs v. SAILY INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv- 4934 (S.D.N.Y., June 10, 2026) is a civil rights action against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its interactive website, www.saily.com to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons, in violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. During Plaintiff's visits to the Website, the last occurring on April 30, 2026, in an attempt to purchase Wifi For International Travel from Defendant and to view the information on the Website, Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers that denied Plaintiff a shopping experience similar to that of a sighted person and full and equal access to the goods and services offered to the public and made available to the public. Due to the inaccessibility of Defendant's Website, blind and visually-impaired consumers such as Plaintiff, who need screen-readers, cannot fully and equally use or enjoy the goods, and services Defendant offers to the public on its Website, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. Plaintiff FRANK SENIOR is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer. Defendant SAILY INC. operates the Saily online retail store, as well as the Saily interactive Website that provides consumers with access to an array of goods and services including information about Defendant's eSim for international travel, as well as other types of goods, pricing, terms of service, refund, privacy policies and internet pricing specials.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Telephone: 212-228-9795 Facsimile: 212-982-6284 E-mail: Jeffrey@Gottlieb.legal Dana@Gottlieb.legal Michael@Gottlieb.legal SANFORD RAKOFSKY: Brito Sues Over Inaccessible Property ------------------------------------------------------- Carlos Brito, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated mobility-impaired individuals v. SANFORD RAKOFSKY, as Trustee of the SANFORD RAKOFSKY DECLARATION OF TRUST and JR GROUP MIAMI, LLC D/B/A GABLES 76 BP, Case No. 1:26-cv-24103-RAR (S.D. Fla., June 11, 2026), is brought for injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and costs pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") as a result of the Defendants' Commercial Property being inaccessible to people who are disabled. Although over 33 years have passed since the effective date of Title III of the ADA, Defendants have yet to make their facilities accessible to individuals with disabilities. Congress provided commercial businesses one and a half years to implement the Act. The effective date was January 26, 1992. In spite of this abundant lead time and the extensive publicity the ADA has received since 1990, Defendants have continued to discriminate against people who are disabled in ways that block them from access and use of Defendants' property and the businesses therein. The Plaintiff has encountered architectural barriers that are in violation of the ADA at the subject commercial property, and commercial gas station. The barriers to access at Defendants' commercial property, and commercial gas station have each denied or diminished Plaintiff's ability to visit the commercial property and have endangered his safety in violation of the ADA. The Plaintiff has a realistic, credible, existing and continuing threat of discrimination from the Defendants' non-compliance with the ADA with respect to the described commercial property and commercial gas station business, including but not necessarily limited to the allegations of this Complaint. Plaintiff has reasonable grounds to believe that he will continue to be subjected to discrimination at the commercial property, in violation of the ADA. The Defendant have discriminated against the individual Plaintiff by denying him access to, and full and equal enjoyment of, the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages and/or accommodations of the commercial plaza property, as prohibited by the ADA, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a paraplegic (paralyzed from his T-6 vertebrae down) and requires the use of a wheelchair to ambulate. SANFORD RAKOFSKY, as Trustee of the SANFORD RAKOFSKY DECLARATION OF TRUST, owns, operates, and oversees the commercial property.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony J. Perez, Esq. ANTHONY J. PEREZ LAW GROUP, PLLC 7950 w. Flagler Street, Suite 104 Miami, FL 33144 Phone: (786) 361-9909 Facsimile: (786) 687-0445 Email: ajp@ajperezlawgroup.com Secondary Email: jr@ajperezlawgroup.com SIERRA VISTA HOSPITAL: Barnes Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sierra Vista Hospital, Inc. The case is styled as Joseph Barnes, Jacare Craft-Hollis, Kimberly James, Liann Padilla, Raymond Pruitt, Karan Sipsy, Jeremy Sorensen, all others similarly situated v. Sierra Vista Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Sierra Vista Hospital, Case No. 26CV014240 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., June 10, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as "Other Commercial/Business Tort (Not Fraud/Breach of Contract)." Sierra Vista Hospital -- https://sierravistahospital.com/ -- provides a full range of inpatient and outpatient psychiatric services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: M. Anderson Berry, Esq. EMERY REDDY PC 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (916) 823-6955 Email: anderson@emeryreddy.com SONY INTERACTIVE: Qureshi Suit Transferred to N.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Jamal Qureshi, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Case No. 4:26-cv-03460 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on June 8, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-05503-LB to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud for Personal Injury. Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC -- https://sonyinteractive.com/en/ -- is an American video game and digital entertainment company of Japanese conglomerate Sony Group Corporation.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Salar Ali Ahmed, Esq. ALI S. AHMED, PC 430 W. Bell Street Houston, TX 77019 Phone: (713) 898-0982 Email: aahmedlaw@gmail.com The Defendants are represented by: Brian Christopher Nash, Esq. MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 300 Colorado Street, Suite 1800 Austin, TX 78701 Phone: (737) 309-0700 Email: BNash@mofo.com SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REHAB: Bluemel Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Southern California Rehabilitation Services, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Tanner Bluemel, and all persons similarly situated v. Southern California Rehabilitation Services, Inc., Does 1-50, Case No. 26CV014274 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., June 10, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case." Southern California Rehabilitation Services, Inc. is an agency that provides a non-residential center for people with disabilities who live, primarily, in the Southeast area of Los Angeles Countya.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Norman Blumenthal, Esq. BLUMENTHAL NORDREHAUG BHOWMIK DE BLOUW 2255 Calle Clara La Jolla, CA 92037-3107 Phone: 858-551-1223 Fax: 858-551-1232 Email: norm@bamlawca.com SPRING OAKS CAPITAL: Davis Files FDCPA Suit in N.D. Illinois ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Spring Oaks Capital, LLC. The case is styled as Trenia Davis, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. Spring Oaks Capital, LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-06842 (N.D. Ill., June 10, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Spring Oaks Capital, LLC -- https://springoakscapital.com/ -- is an innovative and technology-focused consumer debt purchasing and collections platform.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Samuel Awad, Esq. THE LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI 1515 NE 26TH Street Wilton Manors, FL 33305 Phone: (813) 340-8838 Email: samuel@jibraellaw.com STAR VIEW BEHAVIORAL: Chacon Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Star View Behavioral Health, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Eduardo Chacon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Star View Behavioral Health, Inc., Case No. 26STCV18329 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., June 9, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." Stars Behavioral Health Group -- https://www.starsinc.com/ -- delivers quality mental health and social services throughout California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brent S. Buchsbaum, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF BUCHSBAUM & HAAG, LLP 100 Oceangate, Ste. 1200 Long Beach, CA 90802-4324 Phone: 562-733-2498 Fax: 562-628-5501 Email: brent@buchsbaumhaag.com STEPP'S TOWING: Bucknall Sues Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages ---------------------------------------------------------------- Claude Bucknall and Shaun Cooper, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. STEPP'S TOWING SERVICE INC. and TODD EMORY STEPP, Case No. 8:26-cv-01705 (M.D. Fla., June 11, 2026), is brought the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), for violations of the FLSA for failure to pay overtime compensation (premium pay) to all Tow Truck Drivers (hereinafter "Drivers"), throughout the preceding 3 years of the filing of this complaint to the date of trial. The Plaintiffs worked mandatory schedules of 5 days and were assigned to be on-call on a certain number of evenings, and on certain weekends, which routinely and usually resulted in being called upon to do work by Defendants each on-call shift. The Plaintiffs routinely worked more than 40 hours throughout the term of his employment with GFS and were paid a premium of some amount for their work hours. Upon review of Plaintiffs' paycheck statements, and other drivers for GFS employed within the same time reveals that GFS willfully failed to include the earned commission in the regular rate of pay, resulting in an underpayment of overtime wages, says the complaint. The Plaintiffs worked for the Defendants as a "wrecker" driver, also known as a tow truck driver. Stepp's Towing Service Inc. (STEPP'S) is a Florida for profit corporation with a principal place of business located in Tampa, Florida.[BN] The Plaintiffs is represented by: Mitchell L. Feldman, Esq. FELDMAN LEGAL GROUP 12610 Race Track Road #225 Tampa, FL 33626 Phone: 813-639-9366 Fax: 813-639-9376 Email: Mfeldman@flandgatrialattorneys.com mail@feldmanlegal.us STRATEGIC EDUCATION: Washam Files Suit in E.D. Virginia ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Strategic Education, Inc. The case is styled as Stephanie Washam, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Strategic Education, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-01641 (E.D. Va., June 11, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other Personal Property for Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle. Strategic Education, Inc. (SEI) -- https://www.strategiceducation.com/ -- is an education services holding company.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Steven T. Webster, Esq. WEBSTER BOOK LLP 2300 Wilson Blvd., Suite 728 Arlington, VA 22201 Phone: (888) 987-9991 Email: swebster@websterbook.com STRATEGIC EDUCATION: Wethington Files Suit in E.D. Virginia ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Strategic Education, Inc. The case is styled as Linda Wethington, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. Strategic Education, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-01623-AJT-WEF (E.D. Va., June 10, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. Strategic Education, Inc. (SEI) -- https://www.strategiceducation.com/ -- is an education services holding company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Devon James Munro, Esq. MUNRO BYRD P.C. 4235 Colonial Ave. SW, Suite A Roanoke, VA 24018 Phone: (540) 283-9343 Fax: (540) 283-5162 Email: dmunro@trialsva.com STRATEGIC STAFFING: Gleason Suit Seeks Overtime Wages Under FLSA ---------------------------------------------------------------- NICKLAUS GLEASON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. STRATEGIC STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-12014-JEL-KGA (E.D. Mich., June 16, 2026) seeks all available relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. According to the complaint, the Defendant systematically misclassified Plaintiff and other similarly situated recruiters as exempt employees, worked them long hours, and willfully failed to pay all overtime of wages owed under the FLSA. The Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a sourcing specialist from approximately January 2023 until January 2025. The Plaintiff brings Count I of this lawsuit pursuant to the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 216(b), as a collective action on behalf of himself and the following similarly situated persons: "All current and former Recruiters1 who worked for Defendant in the United States, were paid a salary, and who worked more than forty (40) hours in at least one workweek during the past three years. The Defendant is a nationwide professional staffing company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Adam S. Alexander, Esq. ALEXANDER LAW FIRM 17200 W. Ten Mile, Ste. 200 Southfield, MI 48075 Telephone: (248) 246-6353 Facsimile: (248) 746-3793 E-mail: adalesq@gmail.com - and - Camille Fundora Rodriguez, Esq. Michael J. Anderson, Esq. Alexandra K. Piazza BERGER MONTAGUE PC 1818 Market Street, Suite 3600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 875-4635 Facsimile: (215) 875-4604 E-mail: crodriguez@bergermontague.com manderson@bergermontague.com apiazza@bergermontague.com T.N. WARD COMPANY: Whitton Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against T.N. Ward Company. The case is styled as Patricio Whitton, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. T.N. Ward Company, Case No. EFCA2026-002209 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Oneida Cty., June 10, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Torts (Labor & Employment)." T.N. Ward Company -- https://tnward.com/ -- is a reputable construction firm known for its integrity and quality, serving both private and public sector clients.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Sabine Jean, Esq. Jonathan Apsan, Esq. Joanna Ghosh, Esq. LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE, P.C. 217 Broadway, Suite 511 New York, NY 10007 TASSOS STRIFAS: Mejia Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages ----------------------------------------------------- Pedro Mejia and Yordin Rios on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. TASSOS STRIFAS, GEORGE STRIFAS and STARDUST DINERS INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-03509 (E.D.N.Y., June 11, 2026), is brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and the New York Labor Law (collectively "NYLL"), as a result of the Defendants: unpaid wages for overtime work performed, unpaid spread of hours wages for each day Plaintiffs worked ten or more hours, liquidated damages for failure to pay overtime premium and spread of hours pay, liquidated damages for failure to furnish Plaintiff a notice and acknowledgment at the time of hiring, attorneys' fees, interest, and all costs and disbursements associated with this action. The Defendants have and operated under a decision, policy and plan, and under common policies, programs, practices, procedures, protocols, routines and rules of willfully failing and refusing to pay the Plaintiff and FLSA Collective Plaintiffs at one and one half times their regular rate for work in excess of 40 hours per workweek, and willfully failing to keep records required by the FLSA even though the FLSA Collective Plaintiffs have been and are entitled to overtime. At all relevant times, Defendants willfully, regularly and repeatedly failed to pay Plaintiffs and the FLSA Collective Plaintiffs at the required overtime rate of one and a half times their regular rate for hours worked in excess of 40 hours per workweek, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was employed by Defendants as a busser and dishwasher from about 2012 to March 2026. The Defendants is a full-service diner-restaurant that serves customers.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Marcus Monteiro, Esq. MONTEIRO & FISHMAN LLP 91 N. Franklin Street, Suite 108 Hempstead, NY 11550 Phone: 516/280.4600 Fax: 516/280.4530 Email: mmonteiro@mflawny.com TELEFLORA LLC: Website Conceals Tracking Tools, Schallert Says -------------------------------------------------------------- LAWRENCE SCHALLERT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff vs. TELEFLORA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 2:26-cv-06268 (C.D. Cal., June 9, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for its installation and use of data broker software without obtaining consent or authorization, in violation of the California Penal Code and California's Trap and Trace Law. Defendant Teleflora LLC owns, operates, and markets its products on its website www.teleflora.com The complaint alleges that the Defendant has installed and deployed data broker software on the Website to secretly collect data about visitors, their devices, locations and views of webpages to identify who they are, target them with unwanted marketing and track their internet browsing on an ongoing basis. Moreover, Defendant has partnered with at least one California data broker, LiveRamp, in order to deanonymize and develop clandestine user profiles on otherwise anonymous website visitors. Defendant has done this by installing code and tools proprietary to LiveRamp on the Website. On October 1, 2025, Plaintiff visited the Website. When he did, data that reasonably likely identified him were transmitted to at least one third party who used and profited from that data, along with Defendant: LiveRamp. The Plaintiff and the Class members never consented to sale of their data by or through LiveRamp. Defendant's conduct caused Plaintiff and the Class members significant injuries including invasion of their legally protected privacy rights; their loss of control over personal identifying information due to Defendant's actions; the diminution in value of their data and identity; unauthorized creation of detailed behavioral profiles of them; and the chilling effect on their free online expression and inquiry due to the ongoing tracking of their internet browsing by third parties enabled by Defendant's conduct, says the suit. Plaintiff Lawrence Schallert is a citizen of California residing and located within the Central District of California. DOE Defendants 1 through 10 as unknown entities that Defendant directed and controlled to participate in implementing or maintaining Defendant's deployment of data broker software on the Website.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: J. Evan Shapiro, Esq. Camrie Ventry, Esq. TAULER SMITH LLP 626 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 927-9270 E-mail: eshapiro@taulersmith.com cventry@taulersmith.com THEDACARE INC: Hietpas Sues Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages -------------------------------------------------------------- Michelle Hietpas, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. THEDACARE, INC., Case No. 1:26-cv-01046 (E.D. Wis., June 11, 2026), is brought against Defendant for its failure to pay its employees overtime wages, seeking all available relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ("FLSA"). Although Defendant required the daily meal break deduction, the Plaintiff and other similarly situated hourly healthcare employees were often unable to take a fully uninterrupted, bona fide meal break or otherwise took a shortened meal break because their break was interrupted with substantive job duties. As a result of Defendant's companywide policy and/or practice requiring a meal break deduction to be taken from their hourly, non-exempt healthcare employees' compensable hours worked for meal breaks that were not taken at all or that were shortened/interrupted by substantive work duties, the Plaintiff and other hourly, non-exempt healthcare employees did not receive overtime pay for all overtime hours worked, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was employed by Defendant from July 2023 through September 2025 as a healthcare employee. Thedacare manages and operates a network of at least 9 hospital centers and more than 180 points of care in central and eastern Wisconsin.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Matthew J.P. Coffman, Esq. Adam C. Gedling, Esq. Shannon M. Draher, Esq. Tristan T. Akers, Esq. COFFMAN LEGAL, LLC 1550 Old Henderson Rd., Suite #126 Columbus, OH 43220 Phone: 614-949-1181 Fax: 614-386-9964 Email: mcoffman@mcoffmanlegal.com agedling@mcoffmanlegal.com sdraher@mcoffmanlegal.com takers@mcoffmanlegal.com TRIZETTO PROVIDER: Taylor Suit Transferred to E.D. Mo. ------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned KIMBERLY TAYLOR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. TRIZETTO PROVIDER SOLUTIONS, LLC and CARES COMMUNITY HEALTH d/b/a ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH, Defendants, Case No. 2:26-cv-00086 (E.D. Cal., January 12, 2026) was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri and assigned Case No. 4:26-cv-00913-JAR on June 11, 2026. This case is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to properly secure and safeguard the protected health information ("PHI") and personally identifiable information ("PII") of Plaintiff and other similarly situated patients of Defendant One Community Health, and thus TriZetto Provider Solutions. One Community's current and former patients may have been affected by a breach on TriZetto's system, which occurred between November 2024 and October 2, 2025. As a result, Plaintiff Taylor has suffered imminent and impending injury arising from the substantially increased risk of fraud, identity theft, and misuse resulting from her Sensitive Information being placed in the hands of unauthorized third parties and possibly criminals, says the suit. Accordingly, the Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and a class of similarly situated individuals, seek injunctive relief, damages, and restitution, together with costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. The case has been consolidated under Lead case: 4:26-md-03185 in the multi-district action captioned In re: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation And Trizetto Provider Solutions, LLC, Data Security Breach Litigation. Plaintiff Kimberly Taylor is a patient of Defendant One Community Health. Defendant TriZetto Provider Solutions operates "as a health insurance clearinghouse service to process insurance eligibility and claims information" for One Community Health. Defendant One Community Health is a non-profit healthcare organization which provides medical, dental, and behavioral health services to its patients in California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Vess A. Miller, Esq. Natalie Lyons, Esq. COHENMALAD, LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Telephone: (317) 636-6481 E-mail: nlyons@cohenmalad.com vmiller@cohenmalad.com TURNERSVILLE DODGE: Kemble Files Suit in D. New Jersey ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Turnersville Dodge Chrysler Jeep Ram. The case is styled as Stephen Kemble, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Turnersville Dodge Chrysler Jeep Ram, Case No. 1:26-cv-06939 (D.N.J., June 11, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Turnersville Dodge Chrysler Jeep Ram -- https://www.turnersvillejeep.com/ -- is a Jeep dealer in Washington Township, New Jersey.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ari Hillel Marcus, Esq. MARCUS & ZELMAN LLC 701 Cookman Avenue, Suite 300 Asbury Park, NJ 07712 Phone: (732) 695-3282 Fax: (732) 298-6256 Email: ari@marcuszelman.com UNITEDHEALTH GROUP: Dov Wills Suit Transferred to D. Minnesota -------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Dov Wills, PLLC, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc., OptumInsight, Inc., Change Healthcare Operations, LLC, Change Healthcare Solutions LLC, Change Healthcare Holdings Inc., Change Healthcare Technologies LLC, Change Healthcare Pharmacy Solutions, Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-01754 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on June 9, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 0:26-cv-02894-DWF-DJF to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract for Contract Dispute. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated -- https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/ -- is an American multinational health insurance and services company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Kaleigh Boyd, Esq. MCNAUL EBEL PLLC 600 University Street, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 389-9332 Email: kboyd@mcnaul.com The Defendants are represented by: Aaron Schaer, Esq. Dailey Koga, Esq. BALLARD SPAHR LLP (SEA) 1301 2nd Ave., Ste 2800 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 223-7000 Fax: (206) 223-7107 Email: schaera@ballardspahr.com kogad@ballardspahr.com - and - Barbara J. Duffy, Esq. LANE POWELL PC 1420 5th Ave Ste 4100 Seattle, WA 98101-2338 Phone: (206) 223-7944 Fax: (206) 223-7107 Email: duffyb@lanepowell.com UNITEDHEALTH GROUP: E5 Therapy Suit Transferred to D. Minnesota --------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as E5 Therapy, Riverbend Counseling Services, ShaMynds Healing Center, PC, Repair Physical Therapy Inc., Compassion Recovery Centers LLC, Achieving Balance Chiropractic, Leading Edge Mental Health, Martin Rocha, MD Inc., Dora K. Gavros, DDS, Inc., and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc., Optum Insight, Change Healthcare, Inc., Change Healthcare Operations, LLC, Change Healthcare Solutions LLC, Change Healthcare Holdings Inc., Change Healthcare Technologies LLC, Change Healthcare Pharmacy Solutions, Inc., Optum Financial, Inc., Optum Bank, Optum Pay, Optum Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-01857 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on June 9, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 0:26-cv-02887-DWF-DJF to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract for Contract Dispute. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated -- https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/ -- is an American multinational health insurance and services company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: David M. Berger, Esq. GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP 1111 Broadway, Suite 2100 Oakland, CA 94607 Phone: (510) 350-9700 Email: dmb@classlawgroup.com The Defendants are represented by: Vassiliki Iliadis, Esq. HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (310) 785-4640 Email: vassi.iliadis@hoganlovells.com UNITEDHEALTH GROUP: K. Sasse Suit Transferred to D. Minnesota ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as K. Sasse Surgical Associates, PC doing business as: Nevada Surgical and Advanced Manual Therapy Institute I, LLC, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc., Optum Insight, Change Healthcare, Inc., Change Healthcare Operations, LLC, Change Healthcare Solutions LLC, Change Healthcare Holdings Inc., Change Healthcare Technologies LLC, Change Healthcare Pharmacy Solutions, Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-01488 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on June 9, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 0:26-cv-02893-DWF-DJF to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated -- https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/ -- is an American multinational health insurance and services company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: David M. Berger, Esq. GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP 1111 Broadway, Suite 2100 Oakland, CA 94607 Phone: (510) 350-9700 Email: dmb@classlawgroup.com - and - Miles N. Clark, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MILES N. CLARK, LLC 5510 S. Fort Apache Road, Suite 30 Las Vegas, NV 89148-7700 Phone: (702) 856-7430 Fax: (702) 552-2370 Email: miles@milesclarklaw.com The Defendants are represented by: Jason D. Smith, Esq. Jessica Chong, Esq. SPENCER FANE LLP 300 South 4th Street, Ste. 1600 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Phone: (702) 408-3400 Fax: (702) 938-8648 Email: jdsmith@spencerfane.com jchong@spencerfane.com UNITEDHEALTH GROUP: Serenity Therapy Suit Transferred to D. Minn. ----------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Serenity Therapy LLC, Carrie Leaf Therapy, LL doing business as: Balanced Life Counseling Solutions, LLC; Paula Gordy LISW LLC; Therapeutic Innovations, PLLC; and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc., Optum Insight, Change Healthcare, Inc., Change Healthcare Operations, LLC, Change Healthcare Solutions LLC, Change Healthcare Holdings Inc., Change Healthcare Technologies LLC, Change Healthcare Pharmacy Solutions, Inc., Optum Inc., Optum Financial, Inc., Optum Bank, Optum Pay, Case No. 4:26-cv-00219 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on June 9, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 0:26-cv-02892-DWF-DJF to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated -- https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/ -- is an American multinational health insurance and services company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: John Barton Goplerud Brian O. Marty SHINDLER, ANDERSON, GOPLERUD & WEESE P.C. 5015 Grand Ridge Drive, Ste 100 West Des Moines, IA 50265 Phone: (515) 223-4567 Email: goplerud@sagwlaw.com marty@sagwlaw.com The Defendants are represented by: Joshua Hughes, Esq. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 801 Grand Avenue, Suite 4100 Des Moines, IA 50309-8002 Phone: (515) 697-3607 Email: hughes.josh@dorsey.com UNITEDHEALTH GROUP: Sunny Days Suit Transferred to D. Minnesota --------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Sunny Days Therapeutics LLC, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc., Optum Insight, Change Healthcare, Inc., Change Healthcare Operations, LLC, Change Healthcare Solutions LLC, Change Healthcare Holdings Inc., Change Healthcare Technologies LLC, Change Healthcare Pharmacy Solutions, Inc., Optum Inc., Optum Financial, Inc., Optum Bank, Optum Pay, Case No. 3:26-cv-00060 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on June 9, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 0:26-cv-02889-DWF-DJF to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract for Breach of Contract. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated -- https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/ -- is an American multinational health insurance and services company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: MaryBeth V. Gibson, Esq. GIBSON CONSUMER LAW GROUP, LLC 4279 Roswell Road, Suite 208-108 Atlanta, GA 30342 Phone: (678) 642-2503 Email: marybeth@gibsonconsumerlawgroup.com The Defendants are represented by: Gavin Reinke, Esq. ALSTON & BIRD, LLP - ATL 1201 West Peachtree St., Suite 4900 Atlanta, GA 30309-3424 Phone: (404) 881-7000 Email: gavin.reinke@alston.com UNIVERSAL LLC: Singh Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. -------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Universal LLC. The case is styled as Parminder Singh, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Universal LLC, Case No. STK-CV-UOE-2026-0004934 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., June 8, 2025). The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment."[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: William C. Sung, Esq. JUSTICE FOR WORKERS, P.C. 3600 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 1815 Los Angeles, CA 90010-2622 Phone: 323-922-2000 Email: william@justiceforworkers.com URBANSTEMS INC: Senior Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ----------------------------------------------------------- Milagros Senior, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated v. URBANSTEMS, INC., Case No. 1:26-cv-04938 (S.D.N.Y., June 11, 2026), is brought against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired people. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered thereby, is a violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Because the Defendant's interactive website, www.urbanstems.com, including all portions thereof or accessed thereon (collectively, the "Website" or "Defendant's Website"), is not equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. By failing to make its Website available in a manner compatible with computer screen reader programs, Defendant deprives blind and visually-impaired individuals the benefits of its online goods, content, and services--all benefits it affords nondisabled individuals--thereby increasing the sense of isolation and stigma among those persons that Title III was meant to redress, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer. URBANSTEMS, INC., operates the UrbanStems online retail store, as well as the UrbanStems interactive Website and advertises, markets, and operates in the State of New York and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, N.Y. 10003-2461 Phone: (212) 228-9795 Fax: (212) 982-6284 Email: michael@gottlieb.legal dana@gottlieb.legal jeffrey@gottlieb.legal USA HOME IMPROVEMENT: Wohlstein Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida --------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against USA Home Improvement, LLC. The case is styled as Daniel Wohlstein, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. USA Home Improvement, LLC doing business as: USAHI, Case No. 9:26-cv-80696-XXXX (S.D. Fla., June 11, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. USA Home Improvement -- https://usahomeimprovement.com/ -- specializes in hurricane windows and doors, air conditioning and roofing service.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Christopher Berman, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, PA 1650 SE 17th Street 100 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 Phone: (865) 603-7365 Email: cberman@shamisgentile.com - and - Scott Adam Edelsberg, Esq. EDELSBERG LAW PA 20900 NE 30th Ave. Aventura, FL 33180 Phone: (305) 975-3320 Email: scott@edelsberglaw.com VALERUS HOME EXPERTS: Russell Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida ------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Valerus Home Experts LLC. The case is styled as Julie Russell, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Valerus Home Experts LLC, Case No. 9:26-cv-80694-XXXX (S.D. Fla., June 10, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Valerus Home Experts -- https://valerusre.com/ -- is a reputable real estate agency in Orlando, Florida.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Christopher Berman, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, PA 1650 SE 17th Street 100 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 Phone: (865) 603-7365 Email: cberman@shamisgentile.com VEHO TECH INC: Igwedimma Sues Over Failure to Pay Wages ------------------------------------------------------- Terica Igwedimma, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. VEHO TECH, INC., a Delaware Company, Case No. 1:26-cv-00684-UNA (D. Del., June 10, 2026), is brought pursuant to arising from Defendant's willful violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and for common law claims of breach of contract or (in the alternative) unjust enrichment as a result of the Defendant's failure to pay wages. The Defendant's CSR jobs are hourly, non-exempt positions with rigid schedules that require CSRs, including Plaintiff, to work at least 8 hours per day, on average 5 days each week, and up to 40 hours or more in a workweek. The CSRs' schedules result in many CSRs routinely working unpaid overtime, as more fully explained herein. Throughout their employment with Defendant, Plaintiff was required to work a substantial amount of unpaid time, including overtime, as part of her role as a CSR. The Defendant knew or should have known how long it takes CSRs to complete their off-the-clock work, and Defendant could have properly compensated Plaintiff and the putative Collective and Class for this work but did not. The Defendant knew or should have known that CSRs, including Plaintiff, worked overtime hours for which they were not compensated, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a remote CSR in Alabama within the last 3 years. The Defendant is a technology-driven logistics company that specializes in e-commerce fulfillment, returns management, and last-mile package delivery.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Charles R. Ash, IV, Esq. ASH LAW, PLLC 43000 W. 9 Mile Rd., Ste. 301 Novi, MI 48375 Phone: (734) 234-5583 Email: cash@nationalwagelaw.com - and - Oscar A. Rodriguez, Esq. RODRIGUEZ LAW PLC 402 W. Liberty St. Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Phone: (734) 415-9011 Email: oscar@orodlaw.com VENTURE GLOBAL LNG: Trahan Files FLSA Suit in E.D. Virginia ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Venture Global LNG, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Lloyd Trahan, individually and for others similarly situated v. Venture Global LNG, Inc., Alliance Industrial Group, LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-01595 (E.D. Va., June 8, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Venture Global LNG, Inc. -- https://ventureglobal.com/ -- develops and produces liquefied natural gas.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Zev Hillel Antell, Esq. BUTLER CURWOOD, PLC 140 Virginia Street, Ste. 302 Richmond, VA 23219 Phone: (804) 648-4848 Fax: (804) 237-0413 Email: zev@butlercurwood.com WASHINGTON: Black Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as William Black, on their own behalf and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. Washington State Department of Licensing (DOL), Case No. 26-00002-02804-34 was removed from the Thurston County Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on June 8, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-05606 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. The Washington State Department of Licensing (DOL) -- https://dol.wa.gov/ -- is a department of the Washington state government that administers vehicle and vessel registration and issues driver's licenses.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Joel B. Ard, Esq. ARD LAW GROUP PLLC PO Box 281 Kingston, WA 98346 Phone: (206) 701-9243 Email: joel@ard.law The Defendants are represented by: Cornelia Brandfield-Harvey, Esq. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP (SEA) 999 3rd Ave., Ste 3900 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 332-1380 Email: cbrandfieldharvey@bakerlaw.com XSOLIS INC: Fails to Secure Personal, Health Info, Dion Says ------------------------------------------------------------ WENDY DION, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. XSOLIS, INC., Case No. 3:26-cv-00827 (June 16, 2026) is a class action about the Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard Plaintiff's and Class Members' sensitive personally identifiable information and personal health information from a foreseeable, preventable data breach. On January 20, 2026, criminal hackers accessed Defendant's network systems and stole Plaintiff's and Class Members' PII and PHI stored therein, including their names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, health insurance information, medical treatment information, medical diagnosis information, medical record numbers, medical treatment dates, medical treatment locations, and patient IDs or account numbers causing widespread injuries and damages to Plaintiffs and Class Members (the Data Breach). Accordingly, the Defendant did not detect the Data Breach until January 22, 2026. The Defendant could not perform its operations or provide the services it does without collecting Plaintiff's and Class Members' Private Information and retains it for many years, at least, even after the patient-provider relationship has ended. As a business handling Private Information, the Defendant owes the individuals to whom the data relates a duty to adopt reasonable measures to protect such information from disclosure to unauthorized parties, and to keep it safe and confidential, the suit says. The Plaintiff and Class Members are current and former patients of Defendant or its clients who, in order to obtain services from Defendant or its clients, were and are required to entrust Defendant with their sensitive and confidential Private Information. The Defendant is an artificial intelligence company that services patients and health care providers across the country.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: J. Gerard Stranch, IV, Esq. Grayson Wells, Esq. John C. Roberts, Esq. STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC The Freedom Center 223 Rosa L. Parks Ave., Suite 200 Nashville, TN 37203 Telephone: (615) 254-8801 E-mail: jstranch@stranchlaw.com gwells@stranchlaw.com jroberts@stranchlaw.com XSOLIS INC: Todd Files Suit in M.D. Tennessee --------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Xsolis, Inc. The case is styled as Deborah Todd, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated v. Xsolis, Inc., Case No. 3:26-cv-00800 (M.D. Tenn., June 11, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Breach of Contract. Xsolis, Inc. -- https://www.xsolis.com/ -- operates as healthcare technology company. The Company offers an artificial intelligence-based software platform that helps national health systems.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Alexandra M. Honeycutt, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100 Knoxville, TN 37929 Phone: (865) 247-0080 Fax: (865) 522-0049 Email: ahoneycutt@milberg.com YOUNG'S MARKET COMPANY: Gomez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Young's Market Company, LLC. The case is styled as Santiago Gomez, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Young's Market Company, LLC, Case No. STK-CV-UOE-2026-0005245 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., June 10, 2026). The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment." Young's Market Company, LLC distributes wine and spirits across the wholesale market.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kane Moon, Esq. MOON LAW GROUP, PC 725 S Figueroa St., Ste. 3100 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5404 Phone: 213-232-3128 Fax: 213-232-3125 Email: kane.moon@moonyanglaw.com ZORRO ENTERPRISES: Agusta Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Zorro Enterprises Corp., et al. The case is styled as Marianne Agusta, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated v. Zorro Enterprises Corp., Ruben Zambrano, Paola Puente Montes, Case No. 612532/2026 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty., June 11, 2026). The case type is stated as "Commercial - Contract." Zorro Enterprises Corp. offers full line of amusement vending including video games, pool tables, jukeboxes, games of chance (plush cranes, pile-ups, candy cranes) and pinball.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Alexander Rowland Tiktin, Esq. TARTER KRINSKY & DROGIN LLP 1350 Broadway, New York, NY, 10018 Phone: (212) 216-8099 ********* S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA. Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L. Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors. Copyright 2026. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272. This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the publishers. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed. The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000. *** End of Transmission ***