260604.mbx

260604.mbx C L A S S A C T I O N R E P O R T E R Thursday, June 4, 2026, Vol. 28, No. 111 Headlines 18TH AND WALNUT: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Pelaez Says 2768 STARK: Dietrich Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Compensation 4 STAR GENERAL: Russ Files FLSA Suit in W.D. Arkansas ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY: S.E. Sues Over Invasion of Privacy AEROVIRONMENT INC: Faces Norrell Class Suit Over Stock Price Drop AFNI INC: Johnson Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages AFTCO MFG: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Mueller Alleges AGI CARGO: Brown Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages AGILON HEALTH: Must Oppose Class Cert Bid by June 29 ALL SEASONS LLC: Garcia Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ALLIED UNIVERSAL: Bradford Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ALMINA CONCEPT: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Murphy Alleges AMERICAN INTEGRATED: Wofford Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. AMERICAN SOCIETY: Moradi Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL: Scoggan Files Suit in D. Minnesota ANTHEM TAX SERVICES: Ropero Files TCPA Suit in S.D. California APPFOLIO INC: Beach Suit Transferred to N.D. Georgia ARCHWAY MARKETING: Wilker Sues Over Failure to Secure Information ASPIRE LAW GROUP: Washington Sues Over Unlawful Telephone Calls ASSET LIVING CORPORATION: Ramirez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. AUTOZONE INC: Nowlin Suit Removed from State Ct. to N.D. Cal. AVFLIGHT CORP: Quinn Seeks to Recover Unpaid Wages Under FLSA AVFLIGHT CORPORATION: Quinn Sues to Recover Unpaid Wages BEACON MUTUAL: Fails to Secure Personal, Health Info, Clark Says BERGER & WILLIAMS: Dockery Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. BMO BANK NATIONAL: Urbina Suit Removed to C.D. California BO LUCKEY: Black Seeks Class Certification BYLINGPLANET INC: Anderson Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website CARE GIVERS: 44 Co-Defendants Dropped From "Hodges" FLSA Suit CASE FARMS PROCESSING: Devers Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages CEDAR RESTAURANT: Cruz Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. CERNER CORPORATION: Walker Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri CIGNA HEALTHCARE: Folk Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages CITY OF TENAHA: Fee Award Stands After Reconsideration Denied CLEARPATH CONSULTING: Carmack Files TCPA Suit in M.D. Florida COLIBRI GROUP: Viola Sues Over Failure to Secure Information COMERICA MANAGEMENT: Greer Sues Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages CORE UNIVERSITY: Pardo Sues Over Discriminative Property DAMERON HOSPITAL: Johnson Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. DATAONE USA: Data Center Caused Excessive Noise, Suit Alleges DEL MAR PARK LLC: Ramirez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. DIAMOND PARKING: Mayo Sues Over Unlawful "Parking Owed" Notices DICK BROWNING: Fierro Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. DICK'S SPORTING: Anderson TCPA Suit Removed to W.D. Washington DIFF LLC: Jackson Sues Over Invasion of Privacy DRIVEWAY FINANCE: Young Suit Removed to W.D. Pennsylvania E & S TRUCKING: Initiates Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in Indiana EARTHBOUND HOLDING: Khatib Suit Removed to N.D. Texas ED MORSE LLC: Lively Files TCPA Suit in E.D. Missouri EDWARD P. ROMAINE: ILIOU Family Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. EFEX AI INC: Tauler Sues Over Unsolicited Commercial Emails ELARA CARING PCS: Sweeney Sues Over Cybersecurity Incident EQUIFAX INFORMATION: Court Grants Consent to Dismiss Snyder Suit FEDERAL EXPRESS: Masinas Suit Removed from State Ct. to E.D. Cal. FINANCE OF AMERICA: Faces Vaccaro Labor Suit in Cal. Super. FROST BANK: Pacheco Suit Removed from State Ct. to W.D. Texas FROST BANK: Riley Suit Removed from State Ct. to W.D. Tex. GARAGE GROWN: Cole Suit Balks at Blind-Inaccessible Website GENERAL MILLS OPERATIONS: Most Files Suit in D. Illinois GEORGE'S MUSIC INC: Walker Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website GERBER LIFE INSURANCE: Pettiford Suit Removed to S.D. California GERBER PAYROLL: Berschauer Suit Removed to W.D. Washington GKN AEROSPACE: Sanchez Files Suit in C.D. California GKN AEROSPACE: Shakir Files Suit in C.D. California GOODLEAP LLC: Dominguez Files Suit in E.D. Virginia GOODWIN UNIVERSITY: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Ufumwen Alleges GOOGLE LLC: Reyes Suit Removed to E.D. California HAIN CELESTIAL: Jones Suit Removed to E.D. Missouri HAIN CELESTIAL: Vivanco Sues Over Inaccurate Product Label HALSTED FINANCIAL: Goforth Files FDPCA Suit in E.D. Texas HAMILTON NISSAN: Cruz Files TCPA Suit in D. Maryland HANK'S FURNITURE INC: Lingelbach Files Suit in E.D. Arkansas HANK'S FURNITURE: Randall Files Suit in E.D. Arkansas HAWAII EMPLOYERS' MUTUAL: Lopes Files Suit in D. Hawaii HEALTHCARE INC: Oh Balks at Unlawful Spam Emails, Privacy Invasion HEALTHSTREAM INC: Riley Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Compensation HERTZ CORPORATION: Wieser Suit Removed to W.D. Washington HOME DEPOT: Stuck Suit Removed to N.D. Illinois HOTEL SOLUTIONS: Sunbelt Rentals Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. IKEA US RETAIL: Ghorab Suit Removed to N.D. California IMAGINE 360 SERVICES: Danweber Sues Over Unpaid Back Wages INDEBTED USA INC: Givens Files FDCPA Suit in E.D. Texas INNOVATIVE SCIENTIFIC: Terry Files Suit in D. South Carolina INSOMNIAC HOLDINGS: Lloyd Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. INSPIRE MEDICAL: Indiana Public Suit Transferred to D. Minnesota INSTRUCTURE INC: Fails to Safeguard Student Data, Jacobs Alleges INSTRUCTURE INC: Fails to Secure Private Info, Cox Alleges INSTRUCTURE INC: Zellers Sues Over Failure to Secure Information INSURANCE AGENCY: Kaplan Files TCPA Suit in D. Nebraska INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS: Kovacs Files ADA Suit in S.D. California INTERNATIONAL MEDICATION: Ramirez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. J.M. SMUCKER: Mercado Balks at Mislabeled Hot Fudge Topping JOEY RESTAURANT: Guzman Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. KALEIDA HEALTH: Mack Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Compensation KALSHI INC: Josephson Suit Transferred to S.D. New York KITH RETAIL: Faces Kramer Suit Over Blind-Inaccessible Website KLOECKNER METALS: Kelley Balks at Unprotected Personal Info KOCH INC: JSB Farms Files Suit in N.D. Illinois KOHL'S INC: Swarn Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. LAZ PARKING CALIFORNIA: Tatum Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. LCT OPCO LLC: Wildman Suit Removed to W.D. Washington LEGENDS BRAND: Vaughn Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website LEVOLOR INC: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Mueller Alleges LG MEAT: Escolastico Seeks to Recover Managers' Unpaid Wages LIVINGSTON COUNTY, NY: Vasquez Sues to Seek Compensation LOCCITANE INC: Shaw Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. LUMEXA IMAGING: Fails to Safeguard Private Info, Ellison Says MEDTRONIC INC: Holmes Sues Over Failure to Secure Personal Info MELALEUCA INC: Website Inaccessible to Blind Users, Dalton Says METROPLEX TRADING: Popowicz Removed from State Court to E.D. Pa. MORGAN & MICHAELS: Faces Suit Over Alleged Abusive Debt Collection MULHOLLAND SECURITY: Faces Diaz Class Suit in Cal. Super. NATIONAL MENTOR: Schmidt Files Suit Over Unlawful Tobacco Surcharge NEW YORK, NY: Illegally Imprisoned Detainees, Ruiz Suit Alleges NSMG SHARED: Faces Johnson Class Suit in Cal. Super. Court NUTRIEN LTD: Robert & Donna Alleges Fertilizers' Price Conspiracy PASTA D'ORO: Pineda Seeks Unpaid OT Compensation Under FLSA PPG INDUSTRIES: Faces Bravo Class Suit in Cal. Super. QUIJOTE RESTAURANT: Faces Hernandez Wage-and-Hour Suit in E.D.N.Y. REVISE HOME: Foley Seeks Lost Wages Following Termination ROCKET MORTGAGE: Faces long Suit Over Unwanted Text Messages ROCKY BRANDS: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Mueller Alleges ROYALTON ON THE GREENS: Orgera Seeks Rule 23 Class Certification SELECTQUOTE INSURANCE: Esparza Files Suit for Invasion of Privacy SHERWIN-WILLIAMS MANUFACTURING: Faces Modrovich Suit in W.D. Pa. STIIIZY INC: Faces Suit Over Data Privacy Violations SUNDAY RILEY: Robertson Class Suit Removed to C.D. Cal. TITAN BRANDS: Faces Kirkman Class Suit in W.D. Wash. TRANSGLOBAL HOLDING: Fails to Secure Personal Info, Martinez Says VERTLY LLC: Ortiz Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind VISTA MYRTLE: Property Inaccessible to Disabled People, Suit Says WALT DISNEY: Faces Douay Suit Over Use of Synthetic Fragrance WEST PHARMACEUTICAL: Fails to Secure Personal Info, Lussier Says WHALECO INC: Pottish Suit Removed from State Ct. to C.D. Cal. WILDE BRANDS: Walker Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind ********* 18TH AND WALNUT: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Pelaez Says --------------------------------------------------------------- JUDITH PELAEZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. 18th and Walnut LLC, Case No. 2:26-cv-00241 (N.D. Ind., May 27, 2026) is a civil rights action against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website, https://www.dagnedover.com to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff Pelaez and other blind or visually-impaired individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act. According to the complaint, the website contains significant access barriers that make it difficult if not impossible for blind and visually-impaired customers to use the Website. In fact, the access barriers make it impossible for blind and visually-impaired users to even complete a transaction on the Website. Thus, Defendant excludes the blind and visually impaired from the full and equal participation in the growing Internet economy that is increasingly a fundamental part of the common marketplace and daily living, the suit says. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. The complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination. The Website is a commercial platform through which consumers can browse and offers products and services for online sale. The online store allows the user to view umbrellas and travel accessories, make purchases, and perform a variety of other functions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason B. Marshall, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (463) 777-4196 E-mail: jmarshall@ealg.law 2768 STARK: Dietrich Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Compensation ----------------------------------------------------------- Ryan Dietrich, an individual; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. 2768 STARK, LLC D/B/A FIREHOUSE GRILLE AND PUB, an Ohio Corporation; and MARTIN GRAHAM, an individual, Case No. 1:26-cv-01229 (N.D. Ohio, May 28, 2026), is brought against the Defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ("FLSA") and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act ("OMFWSA"), as a result of unpaid overtime compensation. The Defendants repeatedly and willfully violated the provisions of the FLSA, the OMFMWA, by employing Plaintiffs for workweeks longer than 40 hours, without compensating them for hours worked in excess of 40 hours per week at rates not less than one and one-half times the regular rate at which they were employed. The Defendants did not pay the Plaintiff and similarly situated kitchen staff an overtime premium for hours worked over 40 in a work week. The Plaintiffs were not paid lawful overtime compensation of one and one-half times their properly calculated regular rates for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek, resulting in violations of the FLSA, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was employed by Defendants from March 2022 through January 2026 as kitchen staff. Firehouse provides, and at all relevant times has provided a full-service restaurant and bar.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Adam Lubow, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF ADAM LUBOW 700 W. St. Clair Ave., #320 Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Phone: (216) 250-1321 Email: adamlubow@gmail.com 4 STAR GENERAL: Russ Files FLSA Suit in W.D. Arkansas ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against 4 Star General Contracting, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Jaret Russ, OPHN, LLC, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated v. 4 Star General Contracting, Inc.; Sean Harshaw, individually; John McHughes, individually; John Does 1-5; Case No. 5:26-cv-05118-DCF (W.D. Ark., May 27, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act for Denial of Overtime Compensation. 4 Star General Contracting -- https://4stargc.com/ -- specializes in commercial roofing maintenance and warranty services, ensuring your roof stays durable and protected.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Laurence M. McCredy, Esq. Timothy Chad Hutchinson, Esq. RMP LLP 5519 Hackett Street, Ste. 300-500 Springdale, AR 72762 Phone: (479) 443-2705 Email: lmccredy@rmp.law thutchinson@rmp.law ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY: S.E. Sues Over Invasion of Privacy -------------------------------------------------------- S.E., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY & SKIN CANCER SPECIALISTS, INC., A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, Case No. 5:26-cv-02845 (C.D. Cal., May 26, 2026), is brought concerning the Defendant's disclosure of Plaintiff's and Class Members' Sensitive Information and asserting the following statutory and common law claims against Defendant: Invasion of Privacy; Breach of Confidence; Breach of Fiduciary Duty; Negligence; Breach of Implied Contract; Unjust Enrichment; violations of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, Invasion of Privacy under the California Constitution; violations of the California Unfair Competition Law, and violations of the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act. Through the ADSCS website - https://advanceddermspecialists.com/ (the "Website") – patients can research medical and dermatological treatments, book appointments, make inquiries, and download patient forms. Unfortunately, unbeknownst to Plaintiff and other visitors to Defendant's website, their private personal and health information was not actually being kept private. Instead, through Defendant's patient scheduling software, Defendant collected and transmitted personally identifiable, sensitive health information pertaining to Plaintiff's and other patients' upcoming appointments, including the fact that they had made medical appointment(s); likely reason(s) for their appointment(s); and the location(s) of their appointment(s) (collectively, "Sensitive Health Information") to unauthorized third parties, including Alphabet, Inc. ("Google"), through the use of surreptitious online tracking tools. The Plaintiff and the Class Members used Defendant's website and had their personal Sensitive Health Information tracked by Defendant using the Tracking Tools. However, Defendant never obtained authorization from Plaintiff or Class Members to share their Sensitive Health Information with third parties. At all times relevant to this action, Plaintiff and Class Members gave no informed consent for information about their Sensitive Health Information to be transmitted to the third parties, including the largest advertiser and compiler of user information, says the complaint. The Plaintiff accessed the Website on her personal electronic device to schedule and/or reschedule appointments with SDSCS's location in Victorville, California. ADSCS is a dermatology practice with ten locations in Southern California and four in Northern California, including its location in Victorville, California where Plaintiff sought treatment..[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Daniel Srourian, Esq. SROURIAN LAW FIRM, P.C. 468 N. Camden Dr., Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Phone: (213) 474-3800 Email: daniel@slfla.com - and - Sonjay C. Singh, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 400 East Pratt Street 8th Floor - #16946751 Baltimore, MD 21202 Email: ssingh@sirillp.com - and - M. Zane Johnson, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 100 Pearl Street 14th Floor - # 16946876 Hartford, CT 06103 Email: zjohnson@sirillp.com AEROVIRONMENT INC: Faces Norrell Class Suit Over Stock Price Drop ----------------------------------------------------------------- ERIC NORRELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. AEROVIRONMENT, INC., WAHID NAWABI, KEVIN P. MCDONNELL, and MARY CLUM, Case No. 1:26-cv-01429 (E.D. Va., May 26, 2026) is a federal securities class action on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired AeroVironment securities 1 between June 25, 2025 and March 10, 2026, both dates inclusive, seeking to recover damages caused by the Defendants' violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On May 1, 2025, AeroVironment announced it had completed the acquisition of BlueHalo, LLC, a defense technology firm specializing in advanced engineering products, in an all-stock transaction with an enterprise value of approximately $4.1 billion. Three years earlier, BlueHalo had been awarded a $1.4 billion contract to deliver BADGER phased array antenna systems (a type of advanced ground-terminal system used to track satellites), to support the U.S. Space Force's Satellite Communication Augmentation Resource (SCAR) program. The BADGER would be a bespoke product designed for the U.S. Space Force, according to its specifications. The contract value subsequently increased to $1.7 billion. The SCAR program represents the U.S. Space Force's efforts to modernize antennas used by the Satellite Control Network (SCN), which is comprised of 19 fixed antennas across the world and executes tasks such as tracking satellites, transmitting signals, and conducting telemetry, or accessing data from satellites to assess their status and health. In an April 2023 report, the U.S. Government Accountability Office described the SCN as "aging and difficult to maintain." The U.S. Space Force has described the purpose of the SCAR program as modernizing the aging SCN by introducing phased array antennas to the network that boast newer capabilities, such as the ability to communicate with more than one satellite simultaneously. During the Class Period, the Defendants consistently assured investors that the SCAR program would drive revenue growth for AeroVironment moving forward. Among other items, Defendants stated that the SCAR program represented a "tremendous growth opportunity," that AeroVironment's work pursuant to the contract was "very much on track," that the customer was "asking for more [BADGER systems]," and that the Company stood "ready to build more." Throughout the Class Period, the Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that AeroVironment understated the likelihood that it would imminently face competition from other vendors for the work it performed in connection with the SCAR program and the U.S. Space Force's ongoing efforts to modernize the SCN. Then, on March 10, 2026, AeroVironment announced its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026. Among other items, AeroVironment reported a third-quarter operating loss of $179.0 million, compared to an operating loss of $3.1 million for the same period in fiscal year 2025. These financial results reflected the impact of a $151.3 million goodwill impairment in the Company's space division after the stop work order on the Company's BADGER systems built for the SCAR program. AeroVironment also reported that the U.S. Space Force had terminated the Company's contract concerning the SCAR program, and as a result, it would have to "recompete" for the SCAR program. On this news, AeroVironment's stock price fell $13.84 per share, or 6.24%, to close at $207.73 per share on March 11, 2026. On March 31, 2026, the U.S. Space Force announced its decision to diversify suppliers and rely on less costly commercial, off-the-shelf solutions in connection with its work to upgrade the SCN, instead of pursuing another single-vendor bespoke solution. As a result of Defendants' wrongful acts and omissions, and the precipitous decline in the market value of the Company's securities, Plaintiff and other Class members have suffered significant losses and damages. The Plaintiff acquired AeroVironment securities at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period and was damaged upon the revelation of the alleged corrective disclosures. AeroVironment operates as a defense technology provider delivering integrated capabilities across air, land, sea, space, and cyber.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Steven J. Toll, Esq. Daniel S. Sommers, Esq. S. Douglas Bunch, Esq. COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 1100 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699 E-mail: stoll@cohenmilstein.com dsommers@cohenmilstein.com dbunch@cohenmilstein.com - and - Jeremy A. Lieberman, Esq. J. Alexander Hood II, Esq. POMERANTZ LLP 600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10016 Telephone: (212) 661-1100 Facsimile: (917) 463-1044 E-mail: jalieberman@pomlaw.com ahood@pomlaw.com AFNI INC: Johnson Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages ------------------------------------------------- Jarmiah Johnson and Brelyn Phillips, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. AFNI, INC., An Illinois Corporation, Case No. 1:26-cv-01215-MMM-RLH (C.D. Ill., May 22, 2026), is brought arising from Defendant's willful violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act, and for common law claims of breach of contract or (in the alternative) unjust enrichment seeking unpaid overtime wages. In this case, Defendant encouraged CSRs to log their time based upon their scheduled hours, rather than the actual time spent working. The Defendant requires its CSRs to work a full-time schedule, plus overtime, however, Defendant does not compensate CSRs for all work performed. Despite routinely scheduling CSRs for forty (40) hours in a week, Defendant required all CSRs to obtain advanced approval from Defendant before reporting any overtime hours on their timecards. The Plaintiffs seek to represent in this action all current and former CSRs who are similarly situated to each other in terms of their positions, job duties, pay structure and Defendant's violations of federal and state law. The Defendant knew or should have known how long it takes CSRs to complete their off-the-clock work, and Defendant could have properly compensated Plaintiffs and the putative Collective and Class for this work but did not. The Defendant knew or should have known that CSRs, including Plaintiffs, worked overtime hours for which they were not compensated, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a remote CSR in North Carolina within the last two years. Afni is a corporation that assists businesses by creating efficient solutions for the businesses' obstacles.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Charles R. Ash, IV, Esq. ASH LAW, PLLC 43000 W. Nine Mile Rd., Suite 301 Novi, MI 48375 Phone: (833) NWHLPAY or (833) 694-5729 Email: cash@nationalwagelaw.com - and - Oscar A. Rodriguez, Esq. RODRIGUEZ LAW PLC 402 W. Liberty St. Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Phone: (734) 415-9011 Email: oscar@orodlaw.com AFTCO MFG: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Mueller Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------- TARA NICOLE MUELLER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Aftco Mfg. Co., Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-01077-TWP-KMB (N.D. Ind., May 27, 2026) is a civil rights action against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website, https://marshwearclothing.com to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff Pelaez and other blind or visually-impaired individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act. According to the complaint, the website contains significant access barriers that make it difficult if not impossible for blind and visually-impaired customers to use the Website. In fact, the access barriers make it impossible for blind and visually-impaired users to even complete a transaction on the Website. Thus, Defendant excludes the blind and visually impaired from the full and equal participation in the growing Internet economy that is increasingly a fundamental part of the common marketplace and daily living, the suit says. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. The complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination. The Website is a commercial platform through which consumers can browse and offers products and services for online sale. The online store allows the user to view umbrellas and travel accessories, make purchases, and perform a variety of other functions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason B. Marshall, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (463) 777-4196 E-mail: jmarshall@ealg.law AGI CARGO: Brown Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages ------------------------------------------------ Brandon Brown, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. AGI CARGO, LLC, a limited liability company, Case: No. 1:26-cv-06055 (N.D. Ill., May 22, 2026), is brought against Defendant arising from Defendant's willful violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), the Illinois Minimum Wage Law ("IMWL"), and the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act ("IWPCA"), as a result of the Defendant's unpaid overtime wages. In order to sell its products, Defendant employed hourly non-exempt employees, with job titles including, but not limited to, Ramp Agent and Ramp Lead (collectively "Ramp Leads"). These employees were responsible for, inter alia, guiding inbound and outbound airplanes, transporting and loading passenger cargo, and towing planes between gates. The Defendants violated the FLSA by knowingly suffering or permitting Plaintiff and similarly situated employees to work off-the-clock. Plaintiff seeks a declaration that his rights, and the rights of the putative Collective and Class members, were violated, and a judgment awarding them unpaid back wages, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees and costs to make them and the putative Collective and Class whole for damages they suffered, and to help ensure Defendant will not subject future workers to the same illegal conduct in the future, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a non-exempt hourly Ramp Lead at one of Defendant's locations in Chicago, Illinois from March 2022 through present. The Defendant is a ground handling company based in North America.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jesse L. Young, Esq. SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. One Towne Square, 17th Floor Southfield, MI 48076 Phone: (248) 355-0300 Email: jyoung@sommerspc.com - and - Jonathan Melmed, Esq. Meghan Higday, Esq. MELMED LAW GROUP, P.C. 1801 Century Park E., Suite 850 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (310) 824-3828 Email: mh@melmedlaw.com jm@melmedlaw.com AGILON HEALTH: Must Oppose Class Cert Bid by June 29 ---------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned re AGILON HEALTH, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, Case No. 1:24-cv-00297-DAE (W.D. Tex.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order granting a narrow, three-week continuance of the class certification briefing schedule pending resolution of the pending discovery disputes. Agilon Defendants request that the Court enter a limited revised schedule continuing only the class-certification deadlines as follows: Event Deadline The Defendants' opposition to June 29, 2026 class certification: The Plaintiffs' reply in support of July 31, 2026 class certification: The Defendants' sur-reply in Aug. 14, 2026 opposition to class certification: Accordingly, the discovery that agilon Defendants seek goes to the heart of Rule 23, including Lead Plaintiffs' oversight of the litigation, their trading history, and the factual and legal bases for the claims they seek to certify. Agilon Defendants should not be prejudiced by a schedule compressed as a result of Plaintiffs' own refusal to provide Rule 23 discovery. Nor would an artificial rush serve Rule 23 or the Court's obligation to conduct the "rigorous analysis" required before certifying a class. That analysis must be conducted on a developed record, not one truncated by the Plaintiffs' strategic resistance to certification discovery. A continuance is therefore warranted. The requested relief will allow the Court to resolve the pending motion to compel, allow the Plaintiffs to produce any discovery ordered, and allow agilon Defendants to use that discovery in their opposition. The parties filed their original proposed case schedule on Jan. 13, 2026. Agilon provides healthcare services for seniors. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated May 27, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=IFHk8U at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Yolanda C. Garcia, Esq. Mason Parham, Esq. Barret V. Armbruster, Esq. SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 2323 Cedar Springs, Suite 2600 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 981-3300 Facsimile: (214) 981-3400 E-mail: mparham@sidley.com ygarcia@sidley.com barmbruster@sidley.com ALL SEASONS LLC: Garcia Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against All Seasons, LLC, et al. The case is styled as Alma Mendez Garcia, and all others similarly situated, and the general public, and as an "Aggrieved Employee" on behalf of other "Aggrieved Employees" under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 v. All Seasons, LLC, Does 1-25, Case No. 26CV012656 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., May 26, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case." All Seasons, LLC -- https://www.propertymanagementincoloradosprings.com/ -- is a leader in Colorado Springs property management and Colorado residential real estate since 1986.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Maralle Messrelian, Esq. MM LAW, APC 500 N. Brand Blvd., Ste. 2000 Glendale, CA 91203-3304 Phone: 818-810-7747 Email: maralle@mmlawapc.com ALLIED UNIVERSAL: Bradford Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Allied Universal Security Services, et al. The case is styled as Armond Bradford, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Allied Universal Security Services, a Utah Corporation, Does 1-100, Case No. 26CV012088 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., May 19, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." Allied Universal -- https://www.aus.com/ -- provides integrated security services that combine security personnel, technology, and a variety of professional services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: James M. Treglio, Esq. POTTER HANDY, LLP 100 Pine Street Suite 1250 San Diego, CA 92111 Phone: (415) 534-1911 Fax: (888) 422-5191 Email: jimt@potterhandy.com ALMINA CONCEPT: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Murphy Alleges ----------------------------------------------------------------- JAMES MURPHY, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated v. ALMINA CONCEPT, INC., Case No. 1:26-cv-04383 (S.D.N.Y., May 26, 2026) sues the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its commercial website, www.almina-concept.com to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Plaintiff contends. During Plaintiff's visits to the Website, the last occurring on April 28, 2026, in an attempt to purchase an Oversized Cotton Shirt from Defendant and to view the information on the Website, Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers that denied Plaintiff a shopping experience similar to that of a sighted person and full and equal access to the goods and services offered to the public. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers. The Defendant offers the commercial website, www.almina-concept.com, to the public. The Website offers features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services offered by Defendant and which Defendant ensures delivery of such goods and services throughout the United States including New York State. The goods and services offered by Defendant's Website include information about Defendant's: apparel, as well as other types of goods, pricing, terms of service, refund, privacy policies and internet pricing specials.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Telephone: (212) 228-9795 Facsimile: (212) 982-6284 E-mail: Jeffrey@Gottlieb.legal Dana@Gottlieb.legal Michael@Gottlieb.legal AMERICAN INTEGRATED: Wofford Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against American Integrated Services, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Michael Wofford, on behalf of other aggrieved employees and similarly situated persons v. American Integrated Services, Inc., Does 1-50, Case No. 26CV012177 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., May 19, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case." American Integrated Services, Inc. (AIS) -- https://www.americanintegrated.com/ -- offers comprehensive solutions through environmental construction and remediation, industrial demolition, abatement.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Bryce Fick, Esq. CASTLE LAW: CA EMPLOYMENT COUNSEL, PC 2999 Douglas Blvd, Ste 180 Roseville, CA 95661-4219 Phone: 916-245-0122 Email: bf@castleemploymentlaw.com AMERICAN SOCIETY: Moradi Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. The case is styled as Mollie Moradi, individually, and on behalf of other similarly situated employees v. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Case No. 26STCV15994 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 19, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals -- https://www.aspca.org/ -- is a non-profit organization dedicated to preventing animal cruelty.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ryan T. Chuman, Esq. BLACKSTONE LAW, APC 8383 Wilshire Blvd. Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: 310-622-4278 Email: rchuman@blackstonelawpc.com AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL: Scoggan Files Suit in D. Minnesota -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ameriprise Financial, Inc. The case is styled as Ernest Scoggan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc., Case No. 0:26-cv-02670-KMM-JFD (D. Minn., May 19, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. Ameriprise Financial, Inc. -- https://www.ameriprise.com/ -- is an American diversified financial services company and bank holding company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Bryan L. Bleichner, Esq. Philip Joseph Krzeski, Esq. CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1700 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone: (612) 339-7300 Email: bbleichner@chestnutcambronne.com pkrzeski@chestnutcambronne.com ANTHEM TAX SERVICES: Ropero Files TCPA Suit in S.D. California -------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Anthem Tax Services LLC. The case is styled as Victor Ropero, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Anthem Tax Services LLC, Case No. 3:26-cv-03143-RBM-AHG (S.D. Cal., May 20, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Anthem Tax Services -- https://anthemtaxservices.com/ -- provides tax negotiation, debt relief, preparation, and bookkeeping for any/all required tax years.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Daniel Guinn Shay, Esq. Harrison James Lynch, Esq. Joshua Brandon Swigart, Esq. SHAY LEGAL, APC 2221 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 308 San Diego, CA 92108 Phone: (619) 222-7429 Fax: (866) 431-3292 Email: dan@shaylegal.com harrison@shaylegal.com josh@swigartlawgroup.com APPFOLIO INC: Beach Suit Transferred to N.D. Georgia ---------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Caress Beach, William Fernandes, Jeffrey Houdek, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Appfolio Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-09856 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on May 26, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-02906-ELR to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle. AppFolio, Inc. -- https://www.appfolio.com/ -- is an American company founded in 2006 that offers software-as-a-service applications and services to the real estate industry.[BN] ARCHWAY MARKETING: Wilker Sues Over Failure to Secure Information ----------------------------------------------------------------- Eric Wilker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ARCHWAY MARKETING SERVICES, INC., Case No. 0:26-cv-2721 (D. Minn., May 21, 2026), is brought against Defendant for its failure to secure and safeguard the personal identifiable information ("PII" or "Personal Information") of its customers and/or employees, including, but not limited to, their names and Social Security numbers. According to Defendant's submission to the Maine Attorney General's office, on September 20, 2025, Defendant discovered that an unauthorized party gained access to its network on or about September 19, 2025 (the "Data Breach" or "Breach"). The Defendant owed a duty to Plaintiff and Class Members to implement and maintain reasonable and adequate security measures to secure, protect, and safeguard their PII against unauthorized access and disclosure. Defendant breached that duty by, among other things, failing to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect its customers' and/or employees' PII from unauthorized access and disclosure. The Defendant failed to implement adequate cybersecurity measures, despite possessing the financial resources and technological means to do so. Its misconduct includes failing to detect and prevent the Data Breach, failing to encrypt sensitive data, failing to adequately notify affected individuals in a timely manner, and not taking necessary steps to safeguard data post-breach. As a result of Defendant's inadequate security and breach of its duties and obligations, the Data Breach occurred, and Plaintiff's and Class Members' PII was accessed and disclosed. This action seeks to remedy Defendant's failures and its consequences. Plaintiff brings this action individually and on behalf of all United States residents whose PII was compromised in the Data Breach, says the complaint. The Plaintiff and Class Members provided their PII. The Defendant is a marketing company that "simplifies the complex by leveraging technology and its industry experts in procurement, fulfillment & logistics, and digital solutions to deliver cost savings and improve its clients' speed to market."[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raina C. Borrelli, Esq. STRAUSS BORRELLI PLLC One Magnificent Mile 980 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: (872) 263-1100 Facsimile: (872) 263-1109 Email: raina@straussborrelli.com - and - Andrew W. Ferich, Esq. Brian J. Devall, Esq. AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 201 King of Prussia Road, Suite 650 Radnor, PA 19087 Phone: (310) 474-9111 Facsimile: (310) 474-8585 Email: aferich@ahdootwolfson.com bdevall@ahdootwolfson.com ASPIRE LAW GROUP: Washington Sues Over Unlawful Telephone Calls --------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Washington, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ASPIRE LAW GROUP, PLLC, Case No. 4:26-cv-00544-JDK (E.D. Tex., May 21, 2026), is brought arising from Defendant's unlawful telemarketing campaign to solicit consumers for legal services through high-volume, prerecorded, unregistered, and otherwise unlawful telephone calls in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"). The Plaintiff never provided his telephone number to Defendant. Plaintiff never consented--expressly, in writing, electronically, or otherwise--to receive any telemarketing call, prerecorded message, or solicitation from Defendant. The Plaintiff had no prior business relationship with Defendant. The Plaintiff never requested information from Defendant. The Plaintiff never invited solicitation by Defendant or by any person, agent, or affiliate acting on Defendant's behalf, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was registered to and used by Plaintiff for personal, residential purposes. Aspire Law Group, PLLC is a professional limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Michigan.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mark L. Javitch, Esq. JAVITCH LAW OFFICE 3 East 3rd Ave., Suite 200 San Mateo, CA 94401 Phone: (650) 781-8000 Facsimile: (650) 300-0343 Email: mark@javitchlawoffice.com ASSET LIVING CORPORATION: Ramirez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Asset Living Corporation, et al. The case is styled as Abel Ramirez, on behalf of other similarly situated employees v. Asset Living Corporation, SWBC Professional Employer Services I, LLC, Does 1-25, Case No. 26CV012353 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., May 21, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case." Asset Living -- https://www.assetliving.com/ -- is a true third-party property management firm with decades of experience delivering exceptional value to partners across the nation.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Sage S. Stone, Esq. BLACKSTONE LAW PC 8383 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 745 Beverly Hills, CA 90211-2442 Phone: 310-622-4278 AUTOZONE INC: Nowlin Suit Removed from State Ct. to N.D. Cal. ------------------------------------------------------------- JOHN NOWLIN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada Corporation; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Case No. 26CV03542 (Filed April 1, 2026) was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Mendocino, to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division on May 26, 2026. The Northern District of California Court Clerk asigned Case No. 3:26-cv-04948 to the proceedings. According to the complaint, AutoZone does not concede any allegation, assertion, claim, or demand for relief in the Class Complaint of Plaintiff Nowlin, or that any damages exist. AutoZone: (1) expressly denies that it has violated any state or federal statute, or infringed on the privacy rights of Plaintiff or the putative class; (2) intends to defend this matter vigorously: (3) reserves all defenses and objections to the allegations, assertions, claims, demands for relief, and purported damages set forth in the Complaint; and (4) expressly reserves all rights to respond to and seek dismissal of this lawsuit. AutoZone is an American retailer of aftermarket automotive parts and accessories, the largest in the United States. Founded in 1979, AutoZone has 7,140 stores across the United States, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Brazil, and the US Virgin Islands. The company is based in Memphis, Tennessee.[BN] The Defendant is represented by: Michael Hoffman, Esq. ARENA HOFFMAN LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1670 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 433-1414 Facsimile: (415) 520-0446 E-mail: mhoffman@arenahoffman.com - and - Matthew G. White, Esq. David J. Oberly, Esq. Madison J.D. Mcmahan, Esq. BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C. 165 Madison Avenue, Suite 2000 Memphis, TN 38103 Telephone: (901) 577-8182 Facsimile: (901) 577-2303 E-mail: mwhite@bakerdonelson.com doberly@bakerdonelson.com mmcmahan@bakerdonelson.com AVFLIGHT CORP: Quinn Seeks to Recover Unpaid Wages Under FLSA ------------------------------------------------------------- KAREN QUINN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. AVFLIGHT CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation, d/b/a AVFlight, Case No. 26-11709 (E.D. Mich., May 26, 2026) seeks to recover unpaid wages, unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and other relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Michigan Workforce Opportunity Wage Act, and the Michigan Payment of Wages and Fringe Benefits Act. According to the complaint, AVFlight maintains a uniform, company-wide policy developed and enforced from its Ann Arbor, Michigan headquarters requiring all supervisory employees, nationwide, to remain on-call twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven days per week, subject to a mandatory obligation to physically report to their assigned airport workstation within one hour of being called at any time. AVFlight does not compensate supervisory employees for this on-call time, in violation of both the FLSA and Michigan law. Separately, and from the same Michigan headquarters, AVFlight has adopted a compensation structure that systematically fails to account for substantial work regularly performed by supervisory employees from off-site locations. Despite knowing that supervisors are performing work away from the workstation at AVFlight's direction and for its benefit, AVFlight has refused to compensate them violation of the FLSA's "suffer or permit" doctrine and Michigan law, says the suit. Plaintiff Quinn is an adult resident of Kentucky. She was employed by AVFlight as an hourly supervisory employee at Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport (SDF), Louisville, Kentucky, from May 2017 until her termination on October 26, 2025. AVFlight operates ground-handling operations for Allegiant Air, LLC and other air carriers at airports nationwide. At all relevant times, AVFlight's corporate headquarters in Ann Arbor, Michigan served as the center of its operational decision-making, including the development and enforcement of the on call and compensation policies at issue in this action. Avflight is a privately-owned international company headquartered in Ann Arbor, Michigan.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Samuel Simkins, Esq. Shereef Akeel, Esq. AKEEL & VALENTINE, PLC 888 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 350 Troy, MI 48084 Telephone: (248) 269-9595 E-mail: shereef@akeelvalentine.com sam@akeelvalentine.com AVFLIGHT CORPORATION: Quinn Sues to Recover Unpaid Wages -------------------------------------------------------- Karen Quinn, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. AVFLIGHT CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation, d/b/a AVFlight, Case No. 5:26-cv-11709-JEL-APP (E.D. Mich., May 26, 2026), is brought to recover unpaid wages, unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and other relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended ("FLSA"), the Michigan Workforce Opportunity Wage Act ("WOWA"), and the Michigan Payment of Wages and Fringe Benefits Act ("PWFBA"). Despite the foregoing restrictions and obligations, AVFlight did not compensate supervisors for any on-call time unless a supervisor was physically present at the workstation and had clocked in through its on-site-only timecard system. On-call hours were systematically excluded from recorded hours and thus from compensation. AVFlight's failure to compensate supervisors for on-call time was not inadvertent. The on-call obligation was an explicit, company-wide requirement, and AVFlight management was fully aware that supervisors were subject to it. AVFlight never took any steps to exclude the on call requirement from employment terms or to separately compensate employees for it, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was employed by AVFlight as an hourly supervisory employee at Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport ("SDF"), Louisville, Kentucky, from May 2017 until her termination on October 26, 2025. AVFlight operates ground-handling operations for Allegiant Air, LLC and other air carriers at airports nationwide.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Shereef Akeel, Esq. Samuel Simkins, Esq. AKEEL & VALENTINE, PLC 888 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 350 Troy, MI 48084 Phone: (248) 269-9595 Email: shereef@akeelvalentine.com sam@akeelvalentine.com BEACON MUTUAL: Fails to Secure Personal, Health Info, Clark Says ---------------------------------------------------------------- RONALD CLARK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. THE BEACON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 1:26-cv-00348 (D.R.I., May 28, 2026) seeks to hold the Defendant responsible for the injuries that Defendant inflicted on Plaintiff and over 162,000 others due to Defendant's egregiously inadequate data security, which resulted in the private information of Plaintiff and those similarly situated to be exposed to unauthorized third parties (the "Data Breach"). The data that Defendant exposed to the public is unique and highly sensitive. For one, the exposed data included personal identifying information ("PII") and protected health information ("PHI") like first name or first initial and last name along with one or more of: Social Security number, driver's license number, financial account number, health insurance information and/or medical treatment information. The Plaintiff and Class Members provided this information to Defendant with the understanding Defendant would keep that information private in accordance with both state and federal laws. On May 18, 2026, the Defendant announced the Data Breach to the public, revealing for the first time that on January 14, 2026, Defendant discovered that an unauthorized threat actor had accessed the Private Information of Plaintiff and Class Members. The actual Data Breach purportedly occurred between January 7, 2026 and January 14, 2026. The Defendant, headquartered in Warwick, is a company that provides workers' compensation insurance for businesses in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. It is the leading provider of workers' compensation insurance in Rhode Island.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Peter N. Wasylyk, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF PETER N. WASYLYK 1307 Cha1kstone Ave. Providence, RI 02908 Telephone: (401) 831-7730 Facsimile: (401) 861-6064 E-mail: pnwlaw@aol.com - and - Ryan J. Mcgee, Esq. John A. Yanchunis, Esq. Riya Sharma, Esq. MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX LITIGATION GROUP 201 N. Franklin Street, 7th Floor Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: (813) 275-5272 Facsimile: (813) 222-4736 E-mail: rmcgee@forthepeople.com jyanchunis@forthepeople.com rsharma@forthepeople.com BERGER & WILLIAMS: Dockery Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Berger & Williams, LLP. The case is styled as Natalie Dockery, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Berger & Williams, LLP, Case No. 26CU028427C (Cal. Super. Ct., San Diego Cty., May 26, 2026). The case type is stated as "Negligence." Berger & Williams, LLP -- https://bergerwilliams.com/ -- is a San Diego-based law firm that represents clients throughout the State of California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kristen Lake Cardoso, Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW P.A. One W Las Olas Blvd, Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 525-4100 Email: cardoso@kolawyers.com BMO BANK NATIONAL: Urbina Suit Removed to C.D. California --------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Alejandro Urbina, an individual, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated v. BMO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, Case No. 30-2026-01562573-CU-OE-CXC was removed from tthe Superior Court of California for the County of Orange, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on May 21, 2026, and assigned Case No. 8:26-cv-01281. The Plaintiff brings various wage-and-hour claims stemming from his alleged employment with BMO. The Complaint asserts causes of action on a class-wide basis for: Unfair Competition in violation of Business and Professions Code sections 17200, et seq.; Failure to pay minimum wages in violation of Labor Code sections 1194, 1197, and 1197.1; Failure to pay overtime wages in violation of Labor Code section 510; Failure to provide required meal periods in violation of Labor Code sections 226.7, 512, and the applicable IWC Wage Order; Failure to provide required rest periods in violation of Labor Code sections 226.7, 512, and the applicable IWC Wage Order; Failure to provide accurate itemized statements in violation of Labor Code section 226; Failure to reimburse employees for required expenses in violation Labor Code section 2802; Failure to provide wages when due in violation of Labor Code sections 201, 202, and 203; and Failure to pay sick pay wages in violation of Labor Code sections 201–203, 233, and 246.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Andrew R. Livingston, Esq. Rachel Capler, Esq. Rizelle J. Dizon, Esq. ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Phone: +1 415 773 5700 Facsimile: +1 415 773 5759 Email: alivingston@orrick.com rcapler@orrick.com rdizon@orrick.com BO LUCKEY: Black Seeks Class Certification ------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as BRITTANY BLACK, PRESTON OWENS, and RACHEL WRIGHT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. BO LUCKEY, in his official capacity as Chief of the Capitol Police, a unit of the Mississippi Department of Public Safety (DPS); and SEAN TINDELL, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Public Safety, Case No. 3:26-cv-00377-DPJ-MTP (S.D. Miss.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order certifying a Class, which is defined as: "All persons who currently or will in the future solicit as defined in Miss. Code section 17-31-3(b) within the jurisdiction of the Capitol Police." The proposed Class meets the class certification requirements under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a), (b)(2), and (g). The Plaintiffs request oral argument on their motion for class certification because oral argument will aid the Court's class certification decision. DPS is an administrative department of the Government of Mississippi, headquartered in Jackson. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated May 27, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=v0d86Y at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Joshua Tom, Esq. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MISSISSIPPI Jackson, MS 39225 Telephone: (601) 354-3408 Facsimile: (601) 355-6465 E-mail: jtom@aclu-ms.org BYLINGPLANET INC: Anderson Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website --------------------------------------------------------------- Lisa Anderson, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Bylingplanet, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-05892 (N.D. Ill., May 20, 2026), is brought against Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its Website https://thefitville.com/ (hereinafter "Website" or "the Website") to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Wood and other blind or visually-impaired individuals. The Defendant is denying blind and visually impaired individuals throughout the United States equal access to the goods and services Defendant provides to their non-disabled customers through the Website. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its Website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered, and in conjunction with its physical locations, is a violation of the Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA"). Because Defendant's Website is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures to that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. This complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer. The Defendant provides to the public the Website, which provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including, the ability to purchase a range of comfort-focused footwear and accessories, including walking and running shoes, wide-width sneakers, supportive footwear, sandals, insoles, and socks, as well as footwear designed for common foot conditions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Ohrenberger, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP PLLC 4903 Avenue N Brooklyn, NY 11234 Phone: (844) 731-3343 Email: mohrenberger@ealg.law CARE GIVERS: 44 Co-Defendants Dropped From "Hodges" FLSA Suit ------------------------------------------------------------- In the case captioned as Lacunya Hodges, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Administrative Systems, Inc., et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-92-JDM-JMV (N.D. Miss.), Judge James D. Maxwell II of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, Greenville Division, granted the motions to dismiss filed by forty-four of the forty-five named defendants in this Fair Labor Standards Act collective action. Hodges, a former certified nursing assistant at Care Givers, LLC, filed a collective-action complaint on June 23, 2025, alleging that she and other hourly, non-exempt employees frequently worked more than forty hours a week but were systematically deprived of overtime pay under Section 207 of the FLSA. Beyond her direct employer, Care Givers, LLC, she named forty-two other nursing home LLCs, Administrative Systems, Inc. (ASI), and Medico, LLC as defendants, asserting they formed one large joint employer under common ownership of the Beebe family. All defendants except Care Givers, LLC moved to dismiss, arguing that Hodges lacked standing and had failed to state a plausible FLSA claim against them. The court permitted limited jurisdictional discovery on the employer-employee relationship question before ordering supplemental briefing. The court resolved the motions under Rule 12(b)(1), finding that standing issues must be resolved before class certification. The court held that Hodges's injury -- deprivation of overtime wages -- could only be traceable to an entity that was, as a matter of economic reality, her employer. Because Hodges worked solely at Care Givers, LLC, and made no allegation that any other defendant controlled the details of her service or that she was economically dependent on them, she lacked standing to sue the remaining 44 defendants. The court drew a sharp distinction between the FLSA concepts of enterprise coverage and employer liability. The enterprise theory determines whether a defendant is sufficiently large to be governed by the Act -- specifically, whether the annual dollar volume test is met. FLSA liability, by contrast, is predicated only on an employer-employee relationship. The court observed that being part of a common enterprise does not make an entity a joint employer, and that a defendant must first qualify as an employer before joint employer status can even be considered. Applying the Fifth Circuit's four-factor economic reality test -- which examines whether the alleged employer possessed authority to hire or fire, supervised work schedules or conditions of employment, determined the rate and method of payment, and maintained employment records -- the court evaluated each category of moving defendant. As to the 42 Beebe-related nursing home defendants, the court found that Hodges neither alleged nor produced evidence that any facility she never worked for controlled her service at Care Givers, LLC, or that she was economically dependent on them. As to Medico, LLC, the court found its role as a retirement plan sponsor and building owner provided no basis for an employer-employee relationship with Hodges. As to ASI, the court conducted a factor-by-factor analysis. Hodges produced no evidence that ASI hired or fired her, supervised her work, set her schedule, or that she ever communicated with anyone at ASI or even knew the company existed during her employment. While ASI calculated paychecks and maintained records as a payroll services provider, the court held that providing human resources services does not transform a vendor into an employer. The court also rejected Hodges's supplemental argument that the phrase organized group of persons in the FLSA's definition of person supports single employer liability, finding no authority for that reading and reaffirming that the economic reality test governs employer status. The court further noted that any amendment would be futile. After six months of jurisdictional discovery and supplemental briefing, Hodges had continued to rely solely on corporate relatedness to establish employment relationships -- a basis the court found contrary to law. Accordingly, the motions to dismiss filed by the 44 moving defendants were granted, and all named defendants other than Care Givers, LLC, were dismissed. Care Givers, LLC, remains a defendant in the collective action. A copy of the Court's MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=8lp5sa from PacerMonitor.com CASE FARMS PROCESSING: Devers Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages ------------------------------------------------------------- J'Donte Devers, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC., a North Carolina corporation, Case No. 5:26-cv-00121 (W.D.N.C., May 27, 2026), is brought to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorney's fees, costs, and other relief as appropriate under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). The Plaintiff's most recent base hourly rate of pay was $15.75. In addition to the base rate of pay, Defendant incorporated various types of routine and non-discretionary pay into its compensation structure, including, but not limited to, perfect attendance pay and yield premium pay (collectively "Bonus Pay"). Throughout Plaintiff's employment with Defendant, he and Defendant's Hourly Employees earned Bonus Pay and other non-discretionary remuneration. As non-exempt employees, Defendant's Hourly Employees were entitled to full compensation for all overtime hours worked at a rate of 1.5 times their "regular rate" of pay. Throughout Plaintiff's employment with Defendant, Defendant failed to properly include Plaintiff's Bonus Pay and other non-discretionary remuneration into the regular rate for proper overtime calculation, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a non-exempt, Hourly Employee with the job title Expeditor. The Defendant is an American poultry farming and processing company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ethan C. Goemann, Esq. SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. 119 East Court Square, Suite 205 Decatur, GA 30030 Phone: (248) 355-0300 Email: egoemann@sommerspc.com CEDAR RESTAURANT: Cruz Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cedar Restaurant Group, LLC. The case is styled as Eduardo Cruz, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. Cedar Restaurant Group, LLC a/k/a Yamashiro Hollywood, Case No. 26STCV15979 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 19, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." Cedar Restaurant Group LLC also known as Yamashiro Hollywood -- https://yamashirohollywood.com/ -- is a dining establishment based in Los Angeles, California, offering a diverse menu of culinary creations.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. LAVI EBRAHIMIAN, LLP 8889 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: (310) 432-0000 Email: jlavi@lelawfirm.com CERNER CORPORATION: Walker Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri ------------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Jerry Walker, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Cerner Corporation doing business as: Oracle Health Inc., Sapphire Community Health, Inc., Case No. 9:25-cv-00188 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri on May 20, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 4:26-cv-00437-BP to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Personal Property for Property Damage. Cerner Corporation doing business as Oracle Health -- https://www.oracle.com/ -- is a US-based, multinational provider of health information technology platforms and services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: John C. Heenan, Esq. HEENAN & COOK 1631 Zimmerman Trail Billings, MT 59102 Phone: (406) 839-9091 Fax: (406) 839-9092 Email: john@lawmontana.com CIGNA HEALTHCARE: Folk Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages ------------------------------------------------------------ George Folk, Jr., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CIGNA HEALTHCARE, INC. and CIGNA-EVERNORTH SERVICES, INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-03631 (E.D. Pa., May 27, 2026), is brought arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") against the Defendants to recover unpaid overtime wages. The Defendants instituted company-wide policies that failed to pay the Plaintiff and the Class Members for all hours worked. As a result of not paying for all hours worked, Defendants owe the Plaintiff and the Class Members substantial wages. The Defendants' unlawful policies include failing to compensate the Plaintiff and Class Members for their compensable preliminary activities, and and instituting a policy of only paying for the time spent by customer service agents on active calls with customers instead of all time worked between the start and end of the workday, and failing to include all non-discretionary payments in the calculation of the regular rate of pay. Consequently, Defendants' compensation policies violate the FLSA which requires non-exempt employees, such as Plaintiff and the Class Members, to be compensated at one and one-half times their regular rates of pay for each hour worked over 40 per week, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Defendants as a customer service representative from September 2014 to August 2025. The Defendants sell insurance products and plans to customers across the U.S.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Matthew S. Parmet, Esq. PARMET PC 3 Riverway, Ste. 1910 Houston, TX 77056 Phone: 713 999 5228 Email: matt@parmet.law - and - Don J. Foty, Esq. FOTY LAW GROUP, P.C. 2 Greenway Plaza, Suite 250 Houston, TX 77046 Phone: (713) 523-0001 Facsimile: (713) 523-1116 Email: dfoty@fotylawgroup.com CITY OF TENAHA: Fee Award Stands After Reconsideration Denied ------------------------------------------------------------- Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, denied Plaintiffs' Rule 59 Motion to Reconsider and Amend the Memorandum Opinion and Order regarding attorney fees in the case captioned as James Morrow, et al., Plaintiffs, v. City of Tenaha Deputy City Marshal Barry Washington, et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 2:08-CV-00288-JRG. The court found no manifest error of law or fact warranting an upward or downward adjustment to the fee awards previously granted. The court also declined Defendants' invitation to apply a downward adjustment based on the Johnson factors. The motion was denied on May 27, 2026. A copy of the Court's MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=LBYj5f from PacerMonitor.com CLEARPATH CONSULTING: Carmack Files TCPA Suit in M.D. Florida ------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Clearpath Consulting Agency LLC, et al. The case is styled as James Carmack, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Clearpath Consulting Agency LLC, Serenity 1, LLC, Case No. 6:26-cv-01181 (M.D. Fla., May 27, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Clearpath Consulting Agency -- https://cpathconsulting.com/ -- specialize in helping people break free from unwanted timeshare contracts, ethically, legally, and permanently.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Stefan Coleman, Esq. COLEMAN, PLLC 18117 Biscayne Blvd-Ste 4152 Miami, FL 33160 Phone: (877) 333-9427 Email: law@stefancoleman.com COLIBRI GROUP: Viola Sues Over Failure to Secure Information ------------------------------------------------------------ Tracy Viola, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. COLIBRI GROUP d/b/a MCKISSOCK LLC, Case No. 4:26-cv-00814 (E.D. Mo., May 22, 2026), is brought arising out of Defendant's failures to properly secure, safeguard, encrypt, and/or timely and adequately destroy Plaintiff's and Class Members' sensitive personal identifiable information that it had acquired and stored for its business purposes. This failure to secure and monitor its network resulted in a May 2026 data breach ("Data Breach") of highly sensitive documents and information stored on the computer network of McKissock, an organization that provides online continuing education, licensing, and professional development services to real estate professionals, appraisers, home inspectors, and other licensed professionals across the United States, including Plaintiff and Class Members. The Defendant's data security failures allowed a targeted cyberattack in May 2026 to compromise Defendant's network (the "Data Breach") that contained personally identifiable information ("PII" or "the Private Information") of Plaintiff and other individuals ("the Class"). The Defendant maintained the Private Information in a reckless manner. In particular, the Private Information was maintained on Defendant's computer network in a condition vulnerable to cyberattacks. Upon information and belief, the mechanism of the Data Breach and potential for improper disclosure of Plaintiff's and Class Members' Private Information was a known risk to Defendant, and thus Defendant was on notice that failing to take steps necessary to secure the Private Information from those risks left that property in a dangerous condition. The Defendant disregarded the rights of Plaintiff's and Class Members by, inter alia, intentionally, willfully, recklessly, or negligently failing to take adequate and reasonable measures to ensure its data systems were protected against unauthorized intrusions; failing to disclose that it did not have adequately robust computer systems and security practices to safeguard Plaintiff's and Class Members' Private Information; failing to take standard and reasonably available steps to prevent the Data Breach; and failing to provide Plaintiff and Class Members with prompt and full notice of the Data Breach, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was a customer of Defendant. McKissock is a leading nationwide provider of online education for licensed professionals, offering a robust suite of services to real estate agents, appraisers, home inspectors, engineers, land surveyors, and other licensed professionals, including qualifying education, continuing education, license upgrade courses, exam preparation, and professional development.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Danielle L. Perry, Esq. Ra O. Amen, Esq. MASON & PERRY LLP 5335 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Ste. 640 Washington, DC 20015 Phone: (202) 429-2290 Email: dperry@masonllp.com ramen@masonllp.com COMERICA MANAGEMENT: Greer Sues Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages ------------------------------------------------------------------ Marion Greer, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. COMERICA MANAGEMENT CO. INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-11696-TGB-EAS (E.D. Mich., May 22, 2026), is brought arising from Defendants' willful violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and common law as a result to the Defendant's failure to pay overtime wages. The Agents routinely worked 40 hours or more per week before accounting for their off-the-clock work. When the off-the-clock work is included, the Agents, even those who were scheduled and paid for only 40 hours per week, worked over 40 hours per week without the required overtime premium for all time worked over 40 hours. Defendant's practice of failing to compensate its Agents for all hours worked violated the Agents' rights under the FLSA. Defendant is liable for its failure to pay its Agents for all work performed, and at the appropriate overtime rate for hours worked in excess of 40 per week, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a call center contact agent from July 2, 2024 to October 31, 2025. The Defendant is a leading finance, business banking, and wealth management company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason J. Tompson, Esq. Paulina R. Kennedy, Esq. SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. One Towne Square, 17th Floor Southfield, MI 48076 Phone: (248) 355-0300 CORE UNIVERSITY: Pardo Sues Over Discriminative Property -------------------------------------------------------- Nigel Frank De La Torre Pardo, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated mobility-impaired individuals v. CORE UNIVERSITY LLC and JOSH'S PREMIUM MEATS LLC D/B/A JOSH'S PREMIUM MEATS, Case No. 1:26-cv-23654-XXXX (S.D. Fla., May 22, 2026), is brought for injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and costs pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") as a result of the Defendant's discrimination against the individual Plaintiff by denying him access to, and full and equal enjoyment of, the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages and/or accommodations of the Commercial Property and business located therein, as prohibited by the ADA. Although over 33 years have passed since the effective date of Title III of the ADA, Defendant has yet to make their facilities accessible to individuals with disabilities. Congress provided commercial businesses one and a half years to implement the Act. The effective date was January 26, 1992. In spite of this abundant lead-time and the extensive publicity the ADA has received since 1990, Defendant has continued to discriminate against people who is disabled in ways that block them from access and use of Defendant's property and the businesses therein. The Plaintiff found the commercial property and butcher shop business located within the commercial property to be rife with ADA violations. The Plaintiff encountered architectural barriers at the commercial property and butcher shop business located within the commercial property and wishes to continue his patronage and use of the premises. The Plaintiff has encountered architectural barriers that are in violation of the ADA at the subject places of public accommodation. The barriers to access at Defendants' commercial property and butcher shop business have each denied or diminished Plaintiff's ability to visit these places of public accommodation and have endangered his safety in violation of the ADA. The Defendants have discriminated against the individual Plaintiff by denying him access to, and full and equal enjoyment of, the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages and/or accommodations of the commercial property, as prohibited by the ADA, says the complaint. The Plaintiff uses a wheelchair to ambulate. CORE UNIVERSITY LLC owns, operates and/or oversees the commercial property CORE UNIVERSITY LLC owns, operates and/or oversees the commercial property.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony J. Perez, Esq. ANTHONY J. PEREZ LAW GROUP, PLLC 7950 w. Flagler Street, Suite 104 Miami, FL 33144 Phone: (786) 361-9909 Facsimile: (786) 687-0445 Email: ajp@ajperezlawgroup.com Secondary Email: jr@ajperezlawgroup.com DAMERON HOSPITAL: Johnson Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Dameron Hospital Association. The case is styled as Jessica Johnson, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. Dameron Hospital Association, Case No. STK-CV-UOE-2026-0003752 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., May 20, 2026). The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment." Dameron Hospital Association -- https://www.dameronhospital.org/ -- provides general medical and surgical hospital services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. LAVI EBRAHIMIAN, LLP 8889 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: (310) 432-0000 Email: jlavi@lelawfirm.com DATAONE USA: Data Center Caused Excessive Noise, Suit Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------- SCOTT MONTGOMERY and MICHAEL GENTILE, individually and on behalf of all others v. DATAONE USA LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-05972-RMB-MJS (D.N.J., May 26, 2026) contends that through its operation and maintenance of the Data Center, the Defendant has emitted, and continues to emit, unreasonable and excessive noise onto Plaintiffs' properties thereby causing property damages through private nuisance, public nuisance, and negligence. Accordingly, on frequent, recurrent, and continuing occasions too numerous to list, the Plaintiffs' properties have been and continue to be physically invaded by excessive noise from Defendant's Data Center. The noise which entered, and continues to enter, Plaintiffs' properties originated from Defendant's Data Center as a result of Defendant's intentional and/or negligent acts and/or omissions. These excessive noise emissions caused by the Defendant's Data Center have been and continue to be emitted across public and private land within the Class Areal, the suit alleges. Mr. Montgomery is an individual citizen of New Jersey that owns and resides at a home located at 3979 Nathan Lane, Vineland, New Jersey. Mr. Gentile is an individual citizen of New Jersey that owns and resides at a home located at 1546 Pennsylvania Avenue, Vineland, New Jersey. DataOne operates the Data Center and has exercised control and ownership over the Data Center at all relevant times.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Kevin S. Riechelson, Esq. COHEN & RIECHELSON 3500 Quakerbridge Road, Suite 203 Hamilton, NJ, 08619 Telephone: (609) 394-8585 Facsimile: (609) 394-8620 E-mail: KRiechelson@crlawoffices.com DEL MAR PARK LLC: Ramirez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Del Mar Park, LLC. The case is styled as Ivan r. Ramirez, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. Del Mar Park, LLC, Case No. 26STCV16256 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 20, 2026). The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment." Del Mar Park in Pasadena is an assisted living community.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. LAVI EBRAHIMIAN, LLP 8889 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: (310) 432-0000 Email: jlavi@lelawfirm.com DIAMOND PARKING: Mayo Sues Over Unlawful "Parking Owed" Notices --------------------------------------------------------------- CANDICE MAYO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. DIAMOND PARKING, INC. and DIAMOND PARKING SERVICES LLC, Defendants, Case No. 26CU026754C (Cal. Super., San Diego Cty., May 14, 2026) is a putative class action against Diamond arising from its unfair, deceptive, and otherwise unlawful bait and-switch scheme of issuing unlawful "Parking Owed" notices to drivers and demanding payments far in excess of the rates it previously advertised for parking. According to the complaint, Diamond's self-service parking facilities prominently advertise hourly rates for parking and direct vehicle owners to a self-serve kiosk or a mobile payment platform to pay at the time they park their vehicles. But the posted signage at Diamond's facilities does not adequately disclose -- and in some cases, fails to disclose altogether -- that drivers who fail to pay Diamond's advertised parking fee at the time they park will be subject to exorbitant penalty fees far in excess of the parking they were initially promised. Due to these deceptive omissions, drivers who park at a Diamond facility and are unable to make payments -- either due to driver error or faulty Diamond payment equipment and platforms -- are unaware they are subject to Diamond's penalty charges, which are sometimes more than double the parking rate that drivers are initially promised when they enter a Diamond facility, says the suit. Diamond Parking, Inc. is a major provider of self-parking facilities in the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Sophia G. Gold, Esq. Amanda J. Rosenberg, Esq. KALIELGOLD PLLC 490 43rd Street, No. 122 Oakland, CA 94609 Telephone: (202) 350-4783 E-mail: sgold@kalielgold.com arosenberg@kalielgold.com - and - Jeffrey D. Kaliel, Esq. KALIELGOLD PLLC 1100 15th Street NW, 4th Floor Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 350-4783 E-mail: jkaliel@kalielplic.com DICK BROWNING: Fierro Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Dick Browning, Inc. The case is styled as Ronnie Fierro, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. Dick Browning, Inc. d/b/a Browning Mazda., Case No. 26STCV16565 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 26, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." Dick Browning, Inc. doing business as Browning Mazda -- https://www.browningmazda.com/ -- provide quality new and used cars for sale at prices our customers can afford.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. LAVI EBRAHIMIAN, LLP 8889 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: (310) 432-0000 Email: jlavi@lelawfirm.com DICK'S SPORTING: Anderson TCPA Suit Removed to W.D. Washington -------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Jamie Anderson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., Case No. 26-00002-13528-2 SEA was removed from the King County Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on May 21, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-01758 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. -- https://www.dickssportinggoods.com/ -- is an American chain of sporting goods stores founded in 1948 by Richard "Dick" Stack.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Anderson Berry, Esq. ARNOLD LAW FIRM 600 Stewart St., Ste. 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (916) 823-6955 Email: anderson@emeryreddy.com The Defendant is represented by: Robert J. Guite, Esq. SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP (SF) 4 Embarcadero Center, 17 Fl San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 434-9100 Fax: (415) 434-3947 Email: RGuite@sheppardmullin.com DIFF LLC: Jackson Sues Over Invasion of Privacy ----------------------------------------------- Carol Jackson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. DIFF, LLC, Case No. 2:26-cv-05478 (C.D. Cal., May 21, 2026), is brought under the California Invasion of Privacy Act ("CIPA"), and the Federal Wiretap Act, as amended by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 ("ECPA"), on behalf of all persons who have accessed and used diffeyewear.com (the "Website"), a website that Defendant owns and operates. Upon accessing the Website, the Plaintiff browsed for and purchased eyewear. Unbeknownst to the Plaintiff, these communications were intercepted in transit by the Third Parties--as enabled by Defendant--including communications that contained Plaintiff's sensitive, personally identifiable information relating to eyewear purchases. Neither Defendant nor the Third Parties procured Plaintiff's prior consent to this interception. The Defendant aids, employs, agrees with, or otherwise enables several third parties--Google LLC; Pinterest, Inc.; and Snap Inc. (collectively, the "Third Parties")--to eavesdrop on communications sent and received by Plaintiff and Class Members, including communications containing sensitive, personally identifiable information relating to eyewear purchases. By failing to procure consent before enabling the Third Parties' interception of these communications, Defendant violated the CIPA and the ECPA, says the complaint. The Plaintiff visited the Website on October 9, 2025. The Defendant is an eyewear company that designs, manufactures, and sells prescription and non-prescription eyeglasses, as well as sunglasses directly to consumers through the Website, diffeyewear.com.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ines Diaz Villafana, Esq. BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. 1990 North California Blvd., 9th Floor Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Phone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 Email: idiaz@bursor.com DRIVEWAY FINANCE: Young Suit Removed to W.D. Pennsylvania --------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Devin Young, on behalf himself and all others similarly situated v. DRIVEWAY FINANCE CORPORATION, Case No. 26-003898 was removed from the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania to the United States District Court for Western District of Pennsylvania on May 27, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-01090. In the Complaint, Plaintiff asserts claims on behalf of himself and all putative Class Members for alleged violations of the Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law ("UTPCPL"), Loan Interest Protection Law ("LIPL"), unjust enrichment and breach of contract. The Plaintiff alleges that Defendant violated the UTPCPL and LIPL because "Camp was not licensed under the CCC when it issued Plaintiff's loan agreement" and, therefore, "every obligation contained in Plaintiff's loan agreement was unenforceable, including Plaintiff's obligation to pay interest, fees, and additional charges, and his obligation to arbitrate any claims or issues."[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kevin Abramowicz, Esq. Kevin Tucker, Esq. Chandler Steiger, Esq. EAST END TRIAL GROUP LLC 6901 Lynn Way, Suite 503 Pittsburgh, PA 15208 Email: kabramowicz@eastendtrialgroup.com ktucker@eastendtrialgroup.com csteiger@eastendtrialgroup.com The Defendants are represented by: Frederick P. Santarelli, Esq. Steven C. Tolliver, Jr., Esq. ELLIOTT GREENLEAF, P.C. Union Meeting Corporate Center V 925 Harvest Drive, Suite 300 Blue Bell, PA 19422 Phone: (215) 977-1000 Fax: (215) 977-1099 Email: FPSantarelli@elliottgreenleaf.com sct@elliottgreenleaf.com E & S TRUCKING: Initiates Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in Indiana --------------------------------------------------------- On May 29, 2026, E & S Trucking LLC filed for Chapter 7 protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Indiana. According to court filings, the Debtor reports between $100,001 and $1,000,000 in debt owed to 1-49 creditors. About E & S Trucking LLC E & S Trucking LLC is a trucking and freight transportation company that provides hauling and logistics services for commercial customers. The company operates within the transportation sector, facilitating the movement of goods and materials. E & S Trucking LLC sought relief under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. Case No. 26-30853) on May 29, 2026. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets of $0-$100,000 and estimated liabilities of $100,001-$1,000,000. Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Paul E. Singleton handles the case. The Debtor is represented by R. David Boyer II, Esq. EARTHBOUND HOLDING: Khatib Suit Removed to N.D. Texas ----------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Noelle Khatib, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. EARTHBOUND HOLDING, LLC, Case No. DC-26-04998 was removed from the 95th District Court of Dallas County, Texas, to the United States District Court for Northern District of Texas on May 22, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-01677-X. The Petition alleges that, on or about December 18, 2025, the Private Information of Khatib and class members was affected by an alleged data security incident involving Earthbound. The Plaintiff's alleges claims against Earthbound for negligence, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, and breach of fiduciary duty.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Andrew Snyder, Esq. M. Anderson Berry, Esq. Gregory Haroutunian, Esq. EMERY REDDY, PC 600 Stewart St., Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 442-9106 Email: andrew@emeryreddy.com anderson@emeryreddy.com gregory@emeryreddy.com - and - Jason M. Wucetich, Esq. Dimitrios V. Korovilas, Esq. WUCETICH & KOROVILAS, LLP 222 N. Pacific Coast Hwy., Suite 2000 El Segundo, CA 90245 Phone: (310) 335-2001 Facsimile: (310) 364-5201 Email: jason@wukolaw.com dimitri@wukolaw.com The Defendants are represented by: Ryan Jones, Esq. COZEN O'CONNOR 1717 Main Street, Suite 3100 Dallas, TX 75201 Phone: (214) 462-3000 Email: ryanjones@cozen.com ED MORSE LLC: Lively Files TCPA Suit in E.D. Missouri ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ed Morse LLC. The case is styled as Alexander Lively, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Ed Morse LLC doing business as: Ed Morse Automotive Group, Case No. 4:26-cv-00828 (E.D. Mo., May 26, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Ed Morse LLC doing business as Ed Morse Automotive Group -- https://www.edmorse.com/ -- is an automotive dealership that provides new & used vehicles.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Leanna Alexis Loginov, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, P.A. 14 N.E. 1st Avenue-Suite 705 Miami, FL 33132 Phone: (305) 479-2299 Fax: (786) 623-0915 Email: lloginov@shamisgentile.com EDWARD P. ROMAINE: ILIOU Family Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Edward P. Romaine, et al. The case is styled as ILIOU Family Holding Company, Inc., Babylon Associates, Bayshore Associates, and all other Plaintiff-Petitioners similarly situated identified in the annexed Exhibit A affecting the parcels listed therein by Section, Block and Lot description v. EDWARD P ROMAINE IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE; CHARLES J BARTHA IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC WORKS; CHARLES J BARTHA IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATIVE HEAD OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; CHARLES J BARTHA IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRPERSON OF THE SEWER AGENCY BOARD; SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; SUFFOLK COUNTY LEGISLATURE; SUFFOLK COUNTY; Case No. 613837/2026 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Suffolk Cty., May 18, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as SP-CPLR Article 78 (Body or Officer). Edward P. Romaine was elected Suffolk County Executive in November of 2023.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: HERMAN KATZ, LLP 538 Broadhollow Rd., Ste. 307 Melville, NY 11747-3638 EFEX AI INC: Tauler Sues Over Unsolicited Commercial Emails ----------------------------------------------------------- Robert Tauler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. EFEX AI, INC. dba STANDARD WORKS, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Case No. 3:26-cv-04848 (N.D. Cal., May 21, 2026), is brought for damages, injunctive relief, and any other available legal or equitable remedies, due to the illegal actions of the Defendant in knowingly and/or willingly engaging in the unlawful practice of advertising in false and deceptive unsolicited commercial e-mails ("spams") in violation of California Business & Professions. The Plaintiff brings this Complaint, individually and on behalf of the putative Class, against Defendant for advertising in at least one unsolicited commercial e-mail1 (i.e., "spams") sent to Plaintiff's California e-mail address beginning on or about May 20, 2026. Defendant sent each of its illegal spam e-mails to a California e-mail address. Plaintiff never gave "direct consent" as required by Bus. & Prof. Code Section 17529.1, to receive commercial e-mail advertisements from, nor did he have a "preexisting or current business relationship pursuant to Bus. & Prof. Code. The unlawful elements of these spams represent willful acts of falsity and deception, rather than clerical errors. The Plaintiff received unlawful unsolicited commercial e-mails linking to Defendant's web page at https://standardworks.ai/. Plaintiff did not give direct consent to Defendant to send Plaintiff any commercial e-mail advertising. , says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a "recipient" of "unsolicited commercial e-mail advertisements." The Defendant has owned and operated the https://standardworks.ai/ website.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kevin J. Cole, Esq. KJC LAW GROUP, A.P.C. 9701 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1000 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Phone: (310) 861-7797 Email: kevin@kjclawgroup.com ELARA CARING PCS: Sweeney Sues Over Cybersecurity Incident ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa Brown Sweeney, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ELARA CARING PCS HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a/ ELARA CARING, Case No. 3:26-cv-01659-K (N.D. Tex., May 21, 2026), is brought arising from a cybersecurity incident that took place on Defendant's network that purportedly occurred between November 4-6, 2025, and again between November 14-17, 2025 (the "Data Breach" or the "Data Incident"). To obtain healthcare services and/or coverage from Defendant, patients, including Plaintiff and Class members, were required to provide sensitive and confidential information to Defendant, including but not limited to their names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, health insurance information, treatment information, medical record number, and medical history information. The Data Breach was discovered on December 12, 2025. As a result of the Data Breach, Plaintiff's private and sensitive personal information, which was entrusted to the Defendant on the basis of the mutual understanding that the Defendant would safeguard it against disclosure, was targeted, and compromised and unlawfully accessed by cybercriminals. The files accessed included but was not limited to the following information provided to the Defendant in its provision of medical services: names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, driver's license and/or state identification numbers, information related to the course of medical treatment received, and other demographic information due to its inextricably close connection to individual's direct identifiers ("Private Information"), says the complaint. The Plaintiff was a patient of Defendant prior to the Data Breach and thus contends she is a victim of the Data Breach. Elara Caring provides comprehensive, personalized in-home healthcare services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Leigh S. Montgomery, Esq. ELLZEY KHERKHER SANFORD MONTGOMERY, LLP 5621 S. Arch Bridge Ct (local) Arlington, TX 76017 4200 Montrose Blvd., Suite 200 Houston, TX 77006 Phone: (888) 350-3931 - and - Andre R. Belanger, Esq. POULIN | WILLEY | ANASTOPOULO 32 Ann Street Charleston, SC 29403 Phone: (803) 222-2222 Fax: (843) 494-5536 Email: andre.belanger@poulinwilley.com cmad@poulinwilley.com EQUIFAX INFORMATION: Court Grants Consent to Dismiss Snyder Suit ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the case captioned as Sarah Snyder, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, Defendant, Civil Action No. 3:24cv757 (RCY) (E.D. Va.), Judge Roderick C. Young of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted Plaintiffs' Consent Motion to Dismiss all individual claims against Defendant with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). The Memorandum Opinion, dated May 27, 2026, resolved a pre-class-certification dismissal under the framework of Shelton v. Pargo, Inc., 582 F.2d 1298 (4th Cir. 1978). The Court had earlier directed the parties to address whether the proposed settlement was tainted by collusion or would prejudice absent putative class members. The Court found the prejudice prong immaterial, as the settlement was binding only as to Plaintiffs' individual claims and did not encompass the putative class claims. On the collusion prong, a careful inquiry into the consideration exchanged revealed an arms-length bargain. Plaintiffs' counsel's 45% contingency fee was its ordinary individual-case contingency. The parties represented no side agreements or hidden consideration existed, and Plaintiffs' recovery was lower than comparable individual FCRA resolutions. Accordingly, the Court granted the motion to dismiss. A copy of the Court's MEMORANDUM OPINION is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=PKskTw from PacerMonitor.com Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC is represented by: Noah Patrick Sullivan, Esq. GENTRY LOCKE Email: nsullivan@gentrylocke.com John C. Toro, Esq. KING & SPALDING LLP Email: jtoro@kslaw.com Zachary A. McEntyre, Esq. KING & SPALDING LLP Email: zmcentyre@kslaw.com Robert Douglas Griest, Esq. KING & SPALDING LLP Email: rgriest@kslaw.com Plaintiffs Barbara Logan, Sarah Snyder, and David Conoly are represented by: Craig Carley Marchiando, Esq. CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, P.C. Email: craig@clalegal.com Emily Connor Kennedy, Esq. CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, P.C. Email: emily@clalegal.com Mark Clifton Leffler, Esq. CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, P.C. Email: mark@clalegal.com Leonard Anthony Bennett, Esq. CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, P.C. Email: lenbennett@clalegal.com FEDERAL EXPRESS: Masinas Suit Removed from State Ct. to E.D. Cal. ----------------------------------------------------------------- The class action lawsuit captioned as ANTHONY MASINAS, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Case No. STK-CV-UOE-2026-0002898 (Filed April 17, 2026) was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Joaquin to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on May 30, 2026. The Eastern District of California Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-at-00898 to the proceeding. The Plaintiff sues FedEx for the following causes of action: unpaid overtime; unpaid meal period premiums; unpaid rest period premiums; unpaid minimum wages; and final wages not timely paid in violation of the California Labor Code. FedEx is an American multinational conglomerate holding company specializing in transportation, e-commerce, and business services. The company is headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Arby Aiwazian, Esq. LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE, PC 450 North Brand Blvd., Suite 900 Glendale, CA 91203 Telephone: (818) 265-1020 Facsimile: (818) 265-1021 E-mail: aa@calljustice.com The Defendant is represented by: Vincent S. Loh, Esq. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 2601 Main Street, Suite 1100 Irvine, California 92614 Telephone: (949) 862-4611 Facsimile: (901) 492-5641 E-mail: thomas.moran@fedex.com Vincent.loh@fedex.com FINANCE OF AMERICA: Faces Vaccaro Labor Suit in Cal. Super. ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against FINANCE OF AMERICA REVERSE LLC. The case is captioned as MICHAEL VACCARO, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated employees vs. FINANCE OF AMERICA REVERSE LLC, Case No. 2026CUOE066466 (Cal. Super., Ventura Cty., May 15, 2026). The suit alleges violation of Employment related laws. The Defendant is a mortgage lender.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ryan A. Quadrel, Esq. BLACKSTONE LAW, APC 8383 Wilshire Blvd, Ste 745 Beverly Hills, CA 90211-2442 Telephone: (310) 622-4278 Facsimile: (855) 786-6356 E-mail: rquadrel@blackstonepc.com FROST BANK: Pacheco Suit Removed from State Ct. to W.D. Texas ------------------------------------------------------------- The class action lawsuit captioned as EDWARD PACHECO, individually and on behalf of all other individuals similarly situated v. FROST BANK, Case No. 2026CI09089 (Filed ) was removed from the 166th Judicial District Court in Bexar County, Texas, to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division on May 26, 2026. The Western District of Texas Court Clekr assigned Case No. 5:26-cv-03409 to the proceedings. The Plaintiff alleges that he is a citizen of the State of Texas and that he provided his personal information to Frost. He alleges that Frost is a Texas state-chartered bank with its principal place of business in San Antonio, Texas. He alleges that Frost was subject to a data incident allegedly affecting the personal information of Plaintiff and other individuals. The Plaintiff purports to represent a putative class of "all persons whose Private Information was compromised because of the April 2026" Incident. He alleges that the total number of putative class members exceeds 250,000 persons. Based on the alleged Incident, Plaintiff asserts claims for: (1) negligence; (2) breach of implied contract; and (3) unjust enrichment. The Plaintiff seeks, on behalf of himself and the putative class, monetary relief of "over $1,000,000," including actual damages, compensatory damages, statutory damages, statutory penalties, reimbursement of out-of-pocket costs, injunctive relief, costs, and attorneys' fees. The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason K. Fagelman, Esq. Joseph E. Simmons, Esq. Ashley Senary Dahlberg, Esq. NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600 Dallas, TX 75201-7932 Telephone: (214) 855-8000 Facsimile: (214) 855-8200 E-mail: jason.fagelman@nortonrosefulbright.com joseph.simmons@nortonrosefulbright.com ashley.dahlberg@nortonrosefulbright.com FROST BANK: Riley Suit Removed from State Ct. to W.D. Tex. ---------------------------------------------------------- The class action lawsuit captioned as Kenneth Riley v. Frost Bank, Case No. 2026CI09422, was removed from 57th Judicial District Court in Bexar County, Texas, to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division on May 26, 2026. The Western District of Texas Court Clekr assigned Case No. 5:26-cv-03408 to the proceeding. The Plaintiff alleges that he is a citizen of the State of Texas and that he provided his personal information to Frost. He alleges that Frost is a Texas state-chartered bank with its principal place of business in San Antonio, Texas. He alleges that Frost was subject to a data incident allegedly affecting the personal information of Plaintiff and other individuals. The Plaintiff purports to represent a putative class of "all persons whose Private Information was compromised because of the April 2026" Incident. He alleges that the total number of putative class members exceeds 250,000 persons. Based on the alleged Incident, Plaintiff asserts claims for: (1) negligence; (2) breach of implied contract; and (3) unjust enrichment. The Plaintiff seeks, on behalf of himself and the putative class, monetary relief of "over $1,000,000," including actual damages, compensatory damages, statutory damages, statutory penalties, reimbursement of out-of-pocket costs, injunctive relief, costs, and attorneys' fees. The Defendant is represented by: Jason K. Fagelman, Esq. Joseph E. Simmons, Esq. Ashley Senary Dahlberg, Esq. NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600 Dallas, TX 75201-7932 Telephone: (214) 855-8000 Facsimile: (214) 855-8200 E-mail: jason.fagelman@nortonrosefulbright.com joseph.simmons@nortonrosefulbright.com ashley.dahlberg@nortonrosefulbright.com GARAGE GROWN: Cole Suit Balks at Blind-Inaccessible Website ----------------------------------------------------------- HARON COLE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Plaintiff v. Garage Grown Gear, LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-06334 (N.D. Ill., May 28, 2026) alleges that the Defendant failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate their website, https://www.garagegrowngear.com to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. According to the complaint, the Defendant is denying blind and visually impaired persons throughout the United States with equal access to the goods and services the website provides to their non-disabled customers through its website. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered, and in conjunction with its physical locations, is a violation of Plaintiff's rights under the ADA. Yet, the website contains significant access barriers that make it difficult if not impossible for blind and visually-impaired customers to use the website. The access barriers make it impossible for blind and visually-impaired users to even complete a transaction on the website, says the suit. The Website is a commercial platform through which consumers can browse and offers products and services for online sale. The online store allows the user to view outdoor gear and accessories, make purchases, and perform a variety of other functions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (844) 731-3343 Facsimile: (630) 478-0856 E-mail: Achan@ealg.law GENERAL MILLS OPERATIONS: Most Files Suit in D. Illinois -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against General Mills Operations, LLC. The case is styled as Ryan Most, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. General Mills Operations, LLC, Case No. 2026LA000735 (D. Ill., DuPage Cty., May 29, 2026). General Mills, Inc. -- https://www.generalmills.com/ -- is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of branded consumer foods sold through retail stores.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Steven G. Perry, Esq. Todd M. Friedman, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF TODD M FRIEDMAN PC 23586 Calabasas Rd., Suite 105 Calabasas, CA 91302 Phone: (323) 306-4234 Email: Steven.perry@toddflaw.com tfriedman@toddflaw.com GEORGE'S MUSIC INC: Walker Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website --------------------------------------------------------------- Leah Walker, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. George's Music, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-06319 (N.D. Ill., May 29, 2026), is brought against Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its Website https://www.georgesmusic.com/ (hereinafter "Website" or "the Website") to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired individuals. The Defendant is denying blind and visually impaired individuals throughout the United States equal access to the goods and services Defendant provides to their non-disabled customers through the Website. Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its Website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered, and in conjunction with its physical locations, is a violation of the Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA"). Because Defendant's Website is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures to that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. This complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is legally visually impaired and a member of a protected class under the ADA. The Defendant provides to the public the Website, which provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including, the ability to purchase a selection of musical instruments and audio equipment, including guitars, amplifiers, keyboards, drums, and music accessories like microphones, mixers, and headphones.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP PLLC 4903 Avenue N, Brooklyn, NY 11234 Office: 844-731-3343 Direct: 929-442-2154 Email: Achan@ealg.law GERBER LIFE INSURANCE: Pettiford Suit Removed to S.D. California ---------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Judith Pettiford, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Gerber Life Insurance Company doing business as: gerberlife.com, Case No. 26CU11597C was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California on May 29, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-03303-RBM-JAC to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Gerber Life -- https://www.gerberlife.com/ -- provides juvenile and family life insurance products to middle-income families along with medical insurance to small- and medium-sized businesses.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott J. Ferrell, Esq. Victoria C. Knowles, Esq. PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS APC 4100 Newport Place Drive Suite 800 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: (949) 706-6464 Fax: (949) 706-6469 Email: sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com vknowles@pacifictrialattorneys.com The Defendants are represented by: Rebecca Blake Durrant, Esq. KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 888 Prospect Street, Suite 200 La Jolla, CA 92037 Phone: (212) 808-7551 Fax: (213) 547-4901 Email: rdurrant@kelleydrye.com GERBER PAYROLL: Berschauer Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ---------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Riley Berschauer and Andra Kelly, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. GERBER PAYROLL SERVICES; DOES 1-20, inclusive, Case No. 26-00002-09844-1, was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on May 26, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-01805. The Complaint sets forth four causes of action: alleged failure to provide meal and rest periods under RCW 49.12 and WAC 296-126-092, alleged failure to pay minimum wage under RCW 49.46, alleged failure to pay overtime wages, and alleged violation of Seattle's Wage Theft Ordinance SMC 14.20. The Complaint is styled as a class action and asserts allegations on behalf of a putative class under Washington Civil Rule 23. Verification of State Court Records ("Verification").[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jamie K. Serb, Esq. Zachary M. Crosner, Esq. CROSNER LEGAL, P.C. 92 Lenora Street, #179 Seattle, WA 98121 Phone: (866) 276-7637 Facsimile: (310) 510-6429 Email: jamie@crosnerlegal.com zach@crosnerlegal.com - and - Nolan Lim, Esq. John Eklof, Esq. NOLAN LIM LAW FIRM, PS 1111 Third Ave., Suite 1850 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 774-8874 Fax: (206) 430-6222 Email: nolan@nolanlimlaw.com john@nolanlimlaw.com - and - Morgan Mentzer, Esq. MX LAW, PLLC 2661 N. Pearl, #211 Tacoma, WA 98407 Phone: (253) 693-0388 Email: morgan@mxlaw.net The Defendants are represented by: Breanne Sheetz Martell, Esq. Eliza Whitworth, Esq. Brian Rho, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. One Union Square 600 University Street, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98101.3122 Phone: 206.623.3300 Facsimile: 206.447.6965 Email: bsmartell@littler.com ewhitworth@littler.com brho@littler.com GKN AEROSPACE: Sanchez Files Suit in C.D. California ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against GKN Aerospace Transparency Systems, Inc. The case is styled as Jonathan Sanchez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 3M Company, GKN Aerospace Services Ltd., Melrose Industries PLC, Case No. 8:26-cv-01296 (C.D. Cal., May 26, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Torts to Land for Tort Negligence. GKN Aerospace -- https://www.gknaerospace.com/ -- is a leading global tier-one supplier of airframe and engine structures, landing gear, electrical interconnection systems, transparencies, and aftermarket services.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Sean L. Litteral, Esq. LITTERAL LLP 1401 21st Street, Suite 5414 Sacramento, CA 95811 Phone: (916) 720-2845 Email: sean@litterallaw.com GKN AEROSPACE: Shakir Files Suit in C.D. California --------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against GKN Aerospace Transparency Systems, Inc. The case is styled as Taher Shakir, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 3M Company, GKN Aerospace Services Ltd., Melrose Industries PLC, Case No. 8:26-cv-01341 (C.D. Cal., May 27, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Torts to Land. GKN Aerospace -- https://www.gknaerospace.com/ -- is a leading global tier-one supplier of airframe and engine structures, landing gear, electrical interconnection systems, transparencies, and aftermarket services.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Mazin A Sbaiti, Esq. SBAITI AND COMPANY PLLC 3102 Maple Avenue, Suite 400 Dallas, TX 75201 Phone: (214) 432-2899 Fax: (214) 853-4367 Email: mas@sbaitilaw.com GOODLEAP LLC: Dominguez Files Suit in E.D. Virginia --------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against GoodLeap, LLC. The case is styled as Kimberly Dominguez, Bradley Leja, all others similarly situated v. GoodLeap, LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-01479 (E.D. Va., May 29, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Truth in Lending. GoodLeap -- https://www.goodleap.com/ -- is a tech company delivering best-in-class financing and software products for sustainable solutions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Devon James Munro, Esq. MUNRO BYRD P.C. 4235 Colonial Ave. SW, Suite A Roanoke, VA 24018 Phone: (540) 283-9343 Fax: (540) 283-5162 Email: dmunro@trialsva.com GOODWIN UNIVERSITY: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Ufumwen Alleges ----------------------------------------------------------------- ESEOSA UFUMWEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. GOODWIN UNIVERSITY, INC., Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-00728-KAD (D. Conn., May 12, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to properly secure and safeguard personally identifiable information and protected health information of Plaintiff and the Class members. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, by obtaining, collecting, using, and deriving a benefit from the Plaintiff's and Class members' Private Information, Defendant assumed non-delegable legal and equitable duties to Plaintiff and the Class members. The Plaintiff's and the Class members' PII and PHI was compromised due to Defendant's negligent acts and omissions and the failure to protect Plaintiff's and the Class members' Private Information. The Plaintiff and Class Members continue to be at significant risk of identity theft and various other forms of personal, social, and financial harm. The risk will remain for their respective lifetimes, says the suit. Goodwin University, Inc. is a private university in East Hartford, Connecticut, United States. It was founded in 1962 as the Data Institute Business School. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: James J. Reardon, Jr., Esq. REARDON SCANLON LLP 45 South Main Street, Suite 305 West Hartford, CT 06107 Telephone: (860) 955-9455 Facsimile: (860) 920-5242 Email: james.reardon@reardonscanlon.com - and - Rachel Dapeer, Esq. DAPEER LAW, P.A. Florida Bar No. 108039 520 S. Dixie Hwy, #240 Hallandale Beach, FL 33009 Telephone: (954) 799-5914 Email: rachel@dapeer.com - and - Manuel S. Hiraldo, Esq. HIRALDO P.A. 401 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1400 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 400-4713 Email: mhiraldo@hiraldolaw.com GOOGLE LLC: Reyes Suit Removed to E.D. California ------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Peejay Reyes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. GOOGLE LLC, Case No. 26CV491319 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, to the United States District Court for Northern District of California on May 18, 2026, and assigned Case No. 5:26-cv-04700. The Complaint "seeks to remedy" Google's allegedly "unlawful and deceptive business practices in connection with misleading introductory sale promotions of Google's Artificial Intelligence ('AI') Google AI Pro and Google AI Ultra products advertised on Google's website as limited-time or discounted introductory offers that, in reality, are perpetual." The Plaintiff alleges that "by displaying a struck-through regular price next to a lower purchase price" for Google AI Pro and Ultra subscriptions, Google "represented to consumers that each subscription was being offered at a discount from a bona fide regular price." The Complaint asserts two causes of action--one for violation of California's Unfair Competition Law ("UCL"), and another for violation of California Consumers Legal Remedies Act.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Edward D. Johnson, Esq. Kristin W. Silverman, Esq. Elspeth V. Hansen, Esq. MAYER BROWN LLP Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306 Phone: (650) 331-2000 Fax: (650) 331-2060 Email: WJohnson@mayerbrown.com KSilverman@mayerbrown.com EHansen@mayerbrown.com - and - Ankur Mandhania, Esq. MAYER BROWN LLP 101 Second Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: (415) 874-4230 Fax: (415) 331-2060 Email: AMandhania@mayerbrown.com HAIN CELESTIAL: Jones Suit Removed to E.D. Missouri --------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Samantha Jones, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Case No. 26SL-CC02338 was removed from the St. Louis County Circuit Court, to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri on May 22, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 4:26-cv-00810 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. -- https://www.hain.com/ -- is an international food and personal-care company based in the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff appears pro se. The Defendant is represented by: Jozef James Kopchick, Esq. HAAR AND WOODS LLP 1010 Market Street, Suite 1620 St. Louis, MO 63101 Phone: (314) 241-2224 Fax: (314) 241-2227 Email: jkopchick@haar-woods.com HAIN CELESTIAL: Vivanco Sues Over Inaccurate Product Label ---------------------------------------------------------- Jonathan Vivanco, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. The Hain Celestial Group Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-04079-EGC (E.D. Cal., May 28, 2026), is brought aiming to hold the Defendant responsible for failing to truthfully and accurately label and market its snack products (the "Products"). Through the representation on the front of the label of the Products that the Products have "No Artificial Preservatives", and the reiteration of this representation in the marketing material and Products' online listing (these combined representations shall be known as the "Misrepresentation"), Defendant conveys that the Products are free from artificial preservatives. But contrary to the Misrepresentation, the Products contain an artificial preservative – manufactured citric acid. Like other reasonable consumers, Plaintiff was deceived by Defendant's unlawful conduct and brings this action individually and on behalf of all similarly situated consumers to remedy Defendant's unlawful acts, says the complaint. The Plaintiff purchased Defendant's Garden Veggie Zesty Ranch Straws at Target while residing in Porterville, California, in January 2026. The Defendant manufactures, distributes, advertises and sells a line of snack foods.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Adrian Gucovschi, Esq. Nathaniel H. Sari, Esq. GUCOVSCHI LAW FIRM, PLLC 165 Broadway, Fl. 23 New York, NY 10005 Phone: (212) 884-4230 Email: adrian@gucovschilaw.com nathaniel@gucovschilaw.com HALSTED FINANCIAL: Goforth Files FDPCA Suit in E.D. Texas --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Halsted Financial Services, LLC. The case is styled as Antoine Goforth, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Halsted Financial Services, LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-05732 (E.D. Tex., May 18, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Halsted Financial Services -- https://halstedfinancial.com/ -- is a Chicago based collection agency.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Christopher Berman, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, PA 14 NE 1st Ave., Ste. 705 Miami, FL 33132 Phone: (865) 603-7365 Email: cberman@shamisgentile.com HAMILTON NISSAN: Cruz Files TCPA Suit in D. Maryland ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Hamilton Nissan, Inc. The case is styled as Melissa Cruz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Hamilton Nissan, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-02135-ABA (D. Md., May 29, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Hamilton Nissan, Inc. -- https://www.hamiltonnissan.com/ -- are a full service collision center that repairs all makes and models.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Leanna Loginov, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, P.A. 14 N.E. 1st Avenue-Suite 705 Miami, FL 33132 Phone: (305) 479-2299 Fax: (786) 623-0915 Email: lloginov@shamisgentile.com HANK'S FURNITURE INC: Lingelbach Files Suit in E.D. Arkansas ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Hank's Furniture Inc. The case is styled as Jeffery Lingelbach, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Hank's Furniture Inc., Case No. 4:26-cv-00538-BSM (E.D. Ark., May 27, 2026). The nature of suit is stated Other P.I. Hank's Furniture -- https://hanksfurniture.com/ -- provides furniture and home furnishings, including sofas, sectionals, recliners, beds, mattresses, dining sets, and outdoor furniture.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jeff Ostrow, Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW FERGUSON WEISELBERG GILBERT 1 W. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 525-4100 Fax: (954) 525-4300 Email: ostrow@kolawyers.com - and - Joshua Sanford, Esq. SANFORD LAW FIRM, PLLC 10800 Financial Centre Parkway Little Rock, AR 72211 Phone: (501) 221-0088 Fax: (888) 787-2040 Email: josh@sanfordlawfirm.com - and - Mariya Weekes, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 333 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 2000 Miami, FL 33131 Phone: (866) 252-0878 HANK'S FURNITURE: Randall Files Suit in E.D. Arkansas ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Hank's Furniture Inc. The case is styled as Dayna Randall, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Hank's Furniture, Inc., Case No. 4:26-cv-00534-LPR (E.D. Ark., May 22, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. Hank's Furniture Inc. -- https://hanksfurniture.com/ -- provides furniture, bedding, and home accessories. It focuses on offering a variety of products for different living spaces.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joshua Sanford, Esq. SANFORD LAW FIRM, PLLC 10800 Financial Centre Parkway Little Rock, AR 72211 Phone: (501) 221-0088 Fax: (888) 787-2040 Email: josh@sanfordlawfirm.com - and - Laura Van Note, Esq. Scott Edward Cole, Esq. COLE & VAN NOTE 555 12th Street, Suite 2100 Oakland, CA 94607 Phone: (510) 891-9800 Email: lvn@colevannote.com sec@colevannote.com HAWAII EMPLOYERS' MUTUAL: Lopes Files Suit in D. Hawaii ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Hawaii Employers' Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. The case is styled as Sheena Lopes, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Hawaii Employers' Mutual Insurance Company, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-00250-DKW-WRP (D. Hawaii, May 26, 2026). The nature of suit is stated Other P.I. for Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.). Hawaii Employers' Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. doing business as The HEMIC Family of Companies -- https://hemic.com/ -- has insurance products & risk management services for Hawai'i businesses and their workers.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Daniel J. Comer, Esq. Margery S. Bronster, Esq. Robert M. Hatch, Esq. BRONSTER FUJICHAKU ROBBINS, ALC Pauahi Twr., 1003 Bishop St., Ste. 2300 Honolulu, HI 96813 Phone: (808) 524-5644 Fax: (808) 599-1881 Email: dcomer@bfrhawaii.com mbronster@bfrhawaii.com rhatch@bfrhawaii.com HEALTHCARE INC: Oh Balks at Unlawful Spam Emails, Privacy Invasion ------------------------------------------------------------------ JUDY OH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. HEALTHCARE, INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a HEALTHCARE.COM, Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-04484 (N.D. Cal., May 14, 2026) arises from the Defendant's violations of the California Business and Professions Code and the California Trap and Trace Law. The Defendant's entire business model is built around exploiting consumer confusion about official government healthcare marketplace at Healthcare.gov. By registering and using the domain name "healthcare.com" -- a domain intentionally designed to resemble and evoke the official federal marketplace website Healthcare.gov -- and transmitting spam messages referencing "eligibility" for "ACA Plans," the Defendant creates the false and misleading impression that the messages originate from, are affiliated with, or are endorsed by the United States government or relate to the official Affordable Care Act enrollment platform. The Defendant allegedly weaponizes public trust in government healthcare systems in order to induce consumers to click links, disclose personal information, and purchase services they otherwise would not have engaged with absent the misleading association with Healthcare.gov and the Affordable Care Act, says the suit. The Plaintiff is a California citizen and is the owner of the e-mail address thajudster@yahoo.com. Healthcare, Inc. is a marketing company with its principal place of business in Florida.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott J. Ferrell, Esq. Victoria C. Knowles, Esq. PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS A Professional Corporation 4100 Newport Place Drive, Ste. 800 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (949) 706-6464 Facsimile: (949) 706-6469 E-mail: sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com vknowles@pacifictrialattorneys.com HEALTHSTREAM INC: Riley Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Compensation -------------------------------------------------------------- Tanesha Riley, on behalf of herself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. HEALTHSTREAM, INC., Case No. 3:26-cv-00702 (M.D. Tenn., May 27, 2026), is brought to redress Defendant's systematic, companywide violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), by knowingly misclassifying Plaintiff and other similarly situated sales representatives as exempt from the overtime compensation requirements of the FLSA. The Defendant directed sales representatives to work, and they routinely did work, in excess of 40 hours per workweek, but Defendant did not compensate them for overtime wages earned at a rate of one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of 40. The Defendant misclassified sales representatives as exempt from overtime compensation under the FLSA. The Defendant suffered and permitted sales representatives to work more than 40 hours per week without overtime pay. The Defendant did not maintain accurate contemporaneous records of all of the hours sales representatives worked and did not requires sales representatives to maintain such records. The Defendant knew, or should have known, that sales representatives performed non-exempt work that required payment of overtime compensation because it assigned the work they performed and tracked their performance of their work. The Plaintiff and similarly-situated sales representatives were uniformly subject to Defendant's employment policies and practices and were victims of Defendant's company-wide scheme to deprive them of overtime compensation. As a result of Defendant's improper and willful failure to pay Plaintiff and similarly-situated sales representatives in accordance with the requirements of the FLSA, says the complaint. The Plaintiff has been employed by Defendant as a full-time sales representative in the title of "Solution Executive" from March 1, 2021 to the present, less a leave of absence from January 9, 2026 to April 13, 2026. The Defendant is a healthcare technology company that provides software and Software as a Service-based workforce solutions for hospitals and other healthcare organizations, including employee training, learning management, credentialing, scheduling, and clinical competency development tools.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Charles P. Yezbak, III, Esq. Melody Fowler-Green, Esq. N. Chase Teeples, Esq. YEZBAK LAW 2901 Dobbs Ave. Nashville, TN 37211 Phone: (615) 250-2000 Email: yezbak@yezbaklaw.com mel@yezbaklaw.com teeples@yezbaklaw.com - and - Ryan F. Stephan, Esq. James B. Zouras, Esq. Teresa M. Becvar, Esq. Anna M. Ceragioli, Esq. STEPHAN ZOURAS, LLC 222 W. Adams Street, Suite 2020 Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: 312-233-1550 Fax: 312-233-1560 Email: rstephan@stephanzouras.com jzouras@stephanzouras.com tbecvar@stephanzouras.com aceragioli@stephanzouras.com HERTZ CORPORATION: Wieser Suit Removed to W.D. Washington --------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Richard Charles Wieser, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Case No. 26-2-13814-1 SEA was removed from the Superior Court of Washington in and for King County, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on May 29, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-01862. The Complaint asserted a variety of putative class claims, including but not limited toviolations of Washington's anti-moonlighting provision contained in the Washington Noncompetition Covenant Act ("WNCA"); violations of a separate provision of the WNCA relating to noncompetition agreements; meal period violations; rest break violations; failure to pay wages owed; failure to pay overtime; and other claims. Additionally, the Complaint sought double damages and attorneys' fees and costs.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jamie K. Serb, Esq. CROSNER LEGAL, P.C. 92 Lenora Street, #179 Seattle, WA 98121 Phone: (866) 276-7637 Facsimile: (310) 510-6429 Email: jamie@crosnerlegal.com The Defendants are represented by: Matthew Kelly, Esq. SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 999 Third Avenue, Suite 4700 Seattle, WA 98104-4041 Phone: (206) 393-4060 Email: mrkelly@seyfarth.com HOME DEPOT: Stuck Suit Removed to N.D. Illinois ----------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Max Jeremy Stuck, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC. Case No. 2026LA000328 was removed from the Circuit Court for the 12th Judicial District Will County, Illinois, to the United States District Court for Northern District of Illinois on May 21, 2026, and assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-06006. Here, the demands made under Count II, the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act ("IWPCA") claim, are alone in excess of $5 million. In his Complaint, Plaintiff Stuck contends that the IWPCA entitles him and his putative class to be paid for "all time they worked." As such, he claims Home Depot is liable under the IWPCA "to Plaintiff and proposed class members for all unpaid hourly wages, damages in the amount of five percent (5%) per month of the amount of the underpayment, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs."[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Tom Severson, Esq. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 110 North Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: (312) 324-1000 Fax: (312) 324-1001 fax Email: tom.severson@morganlewis.com - and - Michael J. Puma, Esq. Sydney Baxter, Esq. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 2222 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Phone: (215) 963-5000 Fax: (215) 963-5001 Email: michael.puma@morganlewis.com HOTEL SOLUTIONS: Sunbelt Rentals Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Hotel Solutions Group LLC, et al. The case is styled as Sunbelt Rentals, Inc., on its own behalf and on behalf of any others similarly situated v. Hotel Solutions Group LLC; 203 Eggert Road Properties LLC; XYZ Corporation; John Doe and Jane Doe said names being fictitious, it being the intention of Plaintiff to designate any and all occupants of premises, Mortgage Holders, and Lien Holders being foreclosed herein; Case No. Index not Assigned: Pre-RJI (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Erie Cty., May 28, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other Torts (Labor & Employment) Hotel Solutions Group -- https://hotelsolutions.com/ -- is a prominent supplier of building materials and project management services focused on optimizing hotel construction processes.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph M. Shur, Esq. RELIN GOLDSTEIN & CRANE LLP 28 East Main St. Ste 1800 Rochester, NY 14614 Phone: (585) 325-6202 Fax: (585) 325-6201 IKEA US RETAIL: Ghorab Suit Removed to N.D. California ------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Tarek Ghorab, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. IKEA US RETAIL, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No. 26-CIV-02901 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo, to the United States District Court for Northern District of California on May 26, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-04975. The Plaintiff's Complaint asserts causes of action for: Failure to Pay Overtime Wages; Failure to Pay Minimum Wages; Failure to Provide Meal Periods; Failure to Provide Rest Periods; Failure to Pay All Wages Due Upon Termination ("Waiting Time Penalties"); Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage Statements; Failure to Timely Pay Wages During Employment; Failure to Indemnify; and Unfair Competition.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Alexander M. Chemers, Esq. Omar M. Aniff, Esq. Haik Kolsuzyan, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: 213-239-9800 Facsimile: 213-239-9045 Email: zander.chemers@ogletree.com omar.aniff@ogletree.com haik.kolsuzyan@ogletree.com IMAGINE 360 SERVICES: Danweber Sues Over Unpaid Back Wages ---------------------------------------------------------- Kimberly Danweber, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. IMAGINE 360 SERVICES LLC, Case No. 2:26-cv-03662-MRP (E.D. Pa., May 28, 2026), is brought arising from Defendant's willful violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), the Pennsylvania Minium Wage Act ("PMWA"), the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law ("PWPCL"), and common law, seeking unpaid back wages, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees and costs. The Defendant violated the FLSA and common law by systematically failing to compensate its call center representative employees (collectively referred to herein as "CSRs") for work tasks completed before their scheduled shifts, when they were not logged into Defendant's timekeeping system, which resulted in CSRs not being paid for all overtime hours worked, overtime gap time when associated with unpaid overtime and in non-overtime workweeks, for regular hours. More specifically, Defendant failed to compensate CSRs for the substantial time they spent turning on and booting up their computer and computer systems and loading numerous applications and programs prior to clocking in to Defendant' timekeeping system, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked remotely for the Defendant as an hourly, non-exempt CSR from October 2025 through January 2026. The Defendant holds itself out to be "a new kind of health care partner."[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Adam S. Levy, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF ADAM S. LEVY, LLC P.O. Box 88 Oreland, PA 19075 Phone: (267) 994-6952 Email: adamslevy@comcast.net - and - Jason J. Thompson, Esq. Jacob R. Rusch, Esq. SOMMER SCHWARTZ, P.C. One Towne Square, 17th Floor Southfield, MI 48076 Phone: 248-355-0300 Email: jthompson@sommerspc.com jrusch@sommerspc.com INDEBTED USA INC: Givens Files FDCPA Suit in E.D. Texas ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Indebted USA, Inc. The case is styled as Tiffany Givens, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Indebted USA, Inc, Case No. 4:26-cv-00519 (E.D. Tex., May 18, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. InDebted -- https://www.indebted.co/ -- provides debt collection and recovery services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Christopher Berman, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, PA 14 NE 1st Ave., Ste. 705 Miami, FL 33132 Phone: (865) 603-7365 Email: cberman@shamisgentile.com INNOVATIVE SCIENTIFIC: Terry Files Suit in D. South Carolina ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Innovative Scientific Solutions LLC. The case is styled as Ann Terry, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Innovative Scientific Solutions LLC, Case No. 6:26-cv-02107-TMC (D.S.C., May 28, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. Innovative Scientific Solutions LLC (ISSI) -- https://innssi.com/ -- is an engineering research and development company providing Innovative measurement and instrumentation solutions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Paul J. Doolittle, Esq. POULIN WILLEY ANASTOPOULO LLC 32 Ann Street Charleston, SC 29403 Phone: (843) 834-4712 Email: paul.doolittle@poulinwilley.com INSOMNIAC HOLDINGS: Lloyd Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Insomniac Holdings, LLC. The case is styled as Robert Lloyd, III, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Insomniac Holdings, LLC, Case No. 26STCV15952 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 19, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)." Insomniac -- https://www.insomniac.com/ -- is an American electronic music event promoter and music distributor.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: James M. Treglio, Esq. POTTER HANDY, LLP 100 Pine Street Suite 1250 San Diego, CA 92111 Phone: (415) 534-1911 Fax: (888) 422-5191 Email: jimt@potterhandy.com INSPIRE MEDICAL: Indiana Public Suit Transferred to D. Minnesota ---------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Indiana Public Retirement System, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Inspire Medical Systems, Inc., Timothy P Herbert, Richard J. Buchholz, Carlton W. Weatherby, Case No. 1:25-cv-10620 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on May 29, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 0:26-cv-02790-NEB-DJF to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Civil Rights. Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. -- https://www.inspiresleep.com/en-us/ -- is dedicated to elevating and redefining the standard of care for obstructive sleep apnea.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Ernest Chukwunenye Adimora-Nweke, Esq. District Court Information 3050 Post Oak Blvd., Ste. 510 Houston, TX 77056 Phone: (281) 940-5170 Email: ernest@adimoralaw.com The Defendant is represented by: Todd Joseph Dressel, Esq. MCGUIREWOODS LLP Two Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 844-1965 Fax: (415) 844-1934 INSTRUCTURE INC: Fails to Safeguard Student Data, Jacobs Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------------- ELLA JACOBS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. INSTRUCTURE, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive Defendants, Case No. 2:26-cv-05403 (C.D. Cal., May 19, 2026) arises from a cybersecurity incident, data breach, and service outage involving Canvas, the learning management system operated by Defendant. According to the complaint, on April 29,2026, Instructure detected unauthorized activity in Canvas. Instructure has since acknowledged that the data taken included names, email address, student ID numbers, and messages among Canvas users. Instructure further disclosed that on May 7,2026, the unauthorized actor made changes to pages that appeared when some students and teachers were logged in through Canvas. For students, that meant loss of access to course materials, assignments, grades, communications, study materials, and exams. The Plaintiff, as a LACCD student attending LA Pierce College, relied on Canvas for, among other things, course materials, academic communications, assignments, and exams. The students suffered sensitive education record injuries because Instructure has indicated that the data taken included messages among Canvas users, and Canvas message often contain confidential student communications about illness, disability accommodations, pregnancy, mental health, harassment, bullying. The Plaintiff brings this action because Instructure failed to safeguard student data, failed to prevent unauthorized access to and manipulation of Canvas systems, failed to maintain the availability and integrity of critical education infrastructure, and failed to provide timely, adequate, and transparent notice and remediation. The Plaintiff seeks damages, restitution, declaratory relief, and injunctive relief requiring Instructure to remediate its security failures, protect exposed student data and Canvas messages, preserve evidence, provide adequate notice, and compensate students whose privacy, academic activities, finals, credentials, and educational records were affected. Plaintiff Ella Jacobs is a citizen and resident of California and a student at LACCD, attending LA Pierce College, Woodland Hills, California. Plaintiff attended LA Pierce College part of LACCD, used Canvas for LA Pierce College coursework, and suffered injury in Los Angeles County. Defendant Instructure, Inc. develops, operates, hosts, maintains and sells Canvas LMS to educational institutions throughout United States, including institutions in California. Instructure contracted to provide Canvas to California institutions, processed California student data, maintained California student education records and Canvas messages, and caused injury to Plaintiff and proposed class members in California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Nourmand, Esq. James A. De Sario, Esq. THE NOURMAND LAW FIRM, APC 8822 West Olympic Boulevard Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Telephone: (310)553-3600 Facsimile: (310)553-3603 E-mail: mnourmand@nourmandlawfirm.com jdesario@nourmandlawirm.com INSTRUCTURE INC: Fails to Secure Private Info, Cox Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------- ETHAN COX, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. INSTRUCTURE, INC., Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-00453 (D. Utah, May 18, 2026) arises out of the recent data security incident and data breach that was perpetrated against Defendant, which held in its possession certain personally identifiable information ("PII" or "Private Information") of Plaintiff and other students, teachers, and other individuals, the putative class members. The complaint relates that as a condition of using Defendant's educational platform and completing assignments and viewing courses online, Defendant required that its students, including Plaintiff and the Class Members, provide Defendant with their Private Information, including at least the following: names, dates of birth, and other sensitive personal information. On May 1, 2026, Instructure disclosed that it suffered a cybersecurity incident and is working with third-party cybersecurity experts and law enforcement to investigate it. The Data Breach affected hundreds of millions of individuals whose Private Information was maintained in Defendant's systems, including students, teachers, and other staff affiliated with the thousands of learning institutions Defendant serves. The Data Breach resulted from Defendant's failure to implement adequate and reasonable cyber-security procedures and protocols necessary to protect individuals' Private Information with which they were entrusted in connection with Defendant's educational platform and related services, asserts the complaint. The Plaintiff seeks remedies including compensatory damages, reimbursement of out-of-pocket costs, and injunctive relief including improvements to Defendant's data security systems, future annual audits, and adequate credit monitoring services funded by Defendant. Accordingly, Plaintiff brings this action against Defendant seeking redress for its unlawful conduct, and asserting claims for: (i) negligence, (ii) breach of implied contract, and (iii) unjust enrichment. Defendant Instructure, Inc. is a Utah-based learning management system company that provides services to thousands of schools and millions of students across the country. Defendant operates the Canvas platform, which is used by learning institutions, educators, and students to access and manage online course learning materials and to communicate about skill development and learning achievement.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jake J. Lee, Esq. TRUE NORTH INJURY LAW 10808 S. River Front Parkway #302 South Jordan, UT 84095 E-mail: jake@truenorthinjurylaw.com - and - Leigh S. Montgomery, Esq. ELLZEY KHERKHER SANFORD MONTGOMERY, LLP 4200 Montrose Blvd., Suite 200 Houston, TX 77006 Telephone: (888) 350-3931 Facsimile: (888) 276-3455 E-mail: lmontgomery@eksm.com INSTRUCTURE INC: Zellers Sues Over Failure to Secure Information ---------------------------------------------------------------- Remi Zellers, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. INSTRUCTURE, INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-00467-DBP (D. Utah, May 21, 2026), is brought arising from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard Private Information that was entrusted to it, and its accompanying responsibility to store and transfer that information. The Plaintiff and the proposed Class Members bring this class action lawsuit on behalf of all persons who entrusted Defendant with sensitive Personally Identifiable Information ("PII") or "Private Information")1 that was impacted in a data breach (the "Data Breach" or the "Breach"). The Defendant owes Plaintiff and Class Members an affirmative duty to adequately protect and safeguard this PII against theft and misuse. Despite such duties created by statute, regulation, and common law, at all relevant times, Defendant utilized deficient data security practices, thereby allowing sensitive and private data to fall into the hands of strangers. But for Defendant's failure to implement adequate and reasonable cybersecurity procedures and protocols necessary to protect PII, the Data Breach would not have occurred. Despite Defendant's awareness of both the value and sensitivity of the data it safeguarded and serious risk presented by insufficient security practices, Defendant did not take sufficient steps to ensure that its systems were secure. Defendant knew or should have known about the risk to the data it stored and processed, and the critical importance of adequate security measures in the face of increasing threats. While Defendant's breach of its duties led to the Data Breach, it is Plaintiff and other victims of the Data Breach that will bear the burden for years to come. The exponential cost to Plaintiff and the Class Members resulting from the Data Breach cannot be overstated. The Plaintiff and Class Members have been harmed because they are at immediate risk of having their personal information used against them. They suffered harm in the loss of the value of their data which cannot be recovered, says the complaint. The Plaintiff whose Private Information was collected, stored, and maintained by Defendant. The Defendant is a web-based learning management system that provides services for schools.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brent O. Hatch, Esq. Adam M. Pace, Esq. HATCH LAW GROUP, PC 22 East 100 South, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Phone: (801) 869-1919 Email: hatch@hatchpc.com pace@hatchpc.com - and - MaryBeth V. Gibson, Esq. GIBSON CONSUMER LAW GROUP, LLC 4279 Roswell Road, Suite 208-108 Atlanta, GA 30342 Phone: (678) 642-2503 Email: marybeth@gibsonconsumerlawgroup.com INSURANCE AGENCY: Kaplan Files TCPA Suit in D. Nebraska ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Insurance Agency Marketing Services, Inc. The case is styled as Jacob Kaplan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Insurance Agency Marketing Services, Inc., Case No. 4:26-cv-03159-JMD (D. Neb., May 28, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Insurance Agency Marketing Services, Inc. -- https://www.iamsinc.com/ -- strives to provide our agents with the best service in the industry.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Abbas Kazerounian, Esq. KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP APC 245 Fischer Avenue, Unit D1 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: (800) 400-6808 ext. 8 Fax: (800) 520-5523 Email: ak@kazlg.com INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS: Kovacs Files ADA Suit in S.D. California ----------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, et al. The case is styled as Christopher Kovacs, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. InterContinental Hotels Group PLC; Crowne Plaza Costa Mesa Orange County; Crowne Plaza San Diego - Mission Valley; Holiday Inn Express Lancaster; Holiday inn Express Santa Ana, Case No. 3:26-cv-03080-AJB-JAC (S.D. Cal., May 18, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. InterContinental Hotels Group, marketed as IHG Hotels & Resorts -- https://www.ihgplc.com/ -- is a British multinational hospitality company headquartered in Windsor, Berkshire, England.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Laura Grace Van Note, Esq. Scott Edward Cole, Esq. COLE & VAN NOTE 555 12th Street, Suite 1725, Suite 1725 Oakland, CA 94607 Phone: (510) 891-9800 Email: lvn@colevannote.com sec@colevannote.com INTERNATIONAL MEDICATION: Ramirez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against International Medication Systems, Limited, et al. The case is styled as Jesse Ramirez, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. International Medication Systems, Limited, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc., Roth Staffing Companies L.P. Case No. 26STCV16178 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 20, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Non-Exempt Complaints (General Jurisdiction)." International Medication Systems, Ltd. operates as a specialty pharmaceutical company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Vincent C. Granberry, Esq. Joseph Lavi, Esq. Michael L. Huggins, Esq. Jeffrey D. Klein, Esq. LAVI EBRAHIMIAN, LLP 8889 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: (310) 432-0000 Email: vgranberry@lelawfirm.com jlavi@lelawfirm.com jklein@lelawfirm.com J.M. SMUCKER: Mercado Balks at Mislabeled Hot Fudge Topping ----------------------------------------------------------- ALEXANDER MERCADO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. THE J.M. SMUCKER CO., Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-04012 (E.D.N.Y., May 14, 2026) arises from the Defendant's violations of New York General Business Law and for breach of express warranty. The Defendant formulates, manufactures, advertises, and sells Smucker's Sugar Free Hot Fudge Spoonable Topping in all of its various varieties throughout the United States, including in New York. The Defendant represents to consumers through its packaging that the products are "Sweetened with Splenda." This representation sends a clear message to consumers that Splenda is the primary sweetener in the products. Unbeknownst to consumers, however, the Defendant's claims are false because the products are primarily sweetened with other less desirable sweeteners such as maltitol syrup, glycerin and sorbitol, says the suit. Plaintiff Mercado has purchased the products for himself numerous times during the applicable statute of limitations. The J.M. Smucker Co. is an American manufacturer of food and beverage products.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joshua D. Arisohn, Esq. ARISOHN LLC 94 Blakeslee Rd. Litchfield, CT 06759 Telephone: (646) 837-7150 E-mail: josh@arisohnllc.com JOEY RESTAURANT: Guzman Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Dick Browning, Inc. The case is styled as Amanda Guzman, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. JOEY RESTAURANT IRVINE INC.; JOEY RESTAURANT LOS ANGELES INC.; JOEY RESTAURANT MANHATTAN BEACH INC.; JOEY RESTAURANT NEWPORT BEACH INC.; JOEY RESTAURANT SAN DIEGO INC.; JOEY RESTAURANT VALLEY FAIR INC.; JOEY RESTAURANT WOODLAND HILLS INC., Case No. 26STCV16708 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 27, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." JOEY Restaurants -- https://joeyrestaurants.com/ -- is an award-winning, globally inspired brand with a collection of elevated yet comfortable restaurants.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. LAVI EBRAHIMIAN, LLP 8889 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: (310) 432-0000 Email: jlavi@lelawfirm.com KALEIDA HEALTH: Mack Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Compensation ----------------------------------------------------------- Moselle Mack, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. KALEIDA HEALTH, Case No. 1:26-cv-01035 (W.D.N.Y., May 19, 2026), is brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (the "FLSA") and the New York labor laws (hereinafter "NYLL"), to recover unpaid compensation and overtime compensation, as well as liquidated damages, penalties, interest, reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, declaratory and injunctive relief, any other appropriate relief. The FLSA required Defendant to pay all non-exempt employees at least one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours each workweek. Moreover, the NYLL, require, inter alia, payment of all wages due to non-exempt employees in a timely manner without unauthorized deductions. Although Defendant suffered and permitted Plaintiff and the members of the FLSA Collective and the State Law Class to work more than 40 hours per workweek, Defendant failed to pay Plaintiff and the members of the FLSA Collective and the State Law Class overtime at a rate of one and one-half times the regular rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was initially hired by Defendant in May 2024 as a triage nurse. Kaleida Health holds itself out as "the largest healthcare provider in Western New York, serving the area's eight counties with state-of-the-art technology and comprehensive healthcare services."[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Seth R. Lesser, Esq. Jessica Rado, Esq. KLAFTER LESSER LLP Two International Drive, Suite 350 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Phone: (914) 934-9200 Email: seth@klafterlesser.com christopher.timmel@klafterlesser.com - and - Michael A. Galpern, Esq. Amy C. Winters, Esq. JAVERBAUM WURGAFT HICKS KAHN WIKSTROM & SININS Laurel Oak Corporate Center 1000 Haddonfield-Berlin Road - Suite 203 Voorhees, NJ 08043 Phone: (856) 596-4100 Email: mgalpern@lawjw.com awinters@lawjw.com - and - Joseph F. Scott, Esq. Ryan A. Winters, Esq. Kevin M. McDermott, II, Esq. SCOTT & WINTERS LAW FIRM, LLC 11925 Pearl Rd., Suite 308 Strongsville, OH 44136 Phone: (216) 912-2221 Email: jscott@ohiowagelawyers.com rwinters@ohiowagelawyers.com kmcdermott@ohiowagelawyers.com KALSHI INC: Josephson Suit Transferred to S.D. New York ------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Brett Josephson, Luis Cuevas, Tyrone Stuckey, Temuujin Shaariibuu, individually, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Kalshi, Inc., KalshiEX LLC, Kalshi Klear LLC, Kalshi Klear Inc., Kalshi Trading LLC., Case No. 1:26-cv-00220 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on May 18, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-04126-JLR to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Kalshi Inc. -- https://kalshi.com/ -- is a web-based prediction market platform based in Manhattan, New York City and launched in July 2021.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Russell Busch, Esq. BRYSON HARRIS SUCIU & DEMAY PLLC 11 Park Place, 3rd Floor New York, NY 10007 Phone: (919) 926-7948 Email: rbusch@brysonpllc.com The Defendants are represented by: Andrew Porter, Esq. Ashley Satterlee, Esq. Katherine Fell, Esq. Matthew Laroche, Esq. MILBANK LLP 55 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 Phone: (212) -0530 - and - Joshua Sterling, Esq. MILBANK LLP 1101 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20005 Phone: (202) 835-7535 - and - Matthew Charles Wasserman, Esq. DINSMORE 222 W. Adams, Suite 3400 Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: (312) 837-4316 - and - Sean M. Murphy, Esq. MILBANK TWEED HADLEY AND MCCLOY LLP 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza New York, NY 10005 Phone: (212) 530-5688 KITH RETAIL: Faces Kramer Suit Over Blind-Inaccessible Website -------------------------------------------------------------- BETH KRAMER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. KITH RETAIL, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-04007 (S.D.N.Y., May 14, 2026) is a civil action against Kith Retail for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its highly interactive e-commerce website, www.kith.com in a manner that is fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind and visually impaired individuals in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York City Human Rights Law, and the New York State Civil Rights Law. On three separate occasions in 2025 -- specifically on May 6, July 18, and August 9 -- the Plaintiff attempted to access Defendant's website using NonVisual Desktop Access for the purpose of browsing and purchasing several of Defendant's apparel and footwear items. Despite repeated attempts, the Plaintiff was unable to navigate or complete a transaction due to pervasive accessibility barriers that rendered the website incompatible with NVDA. These barriers included, but were not limited to: missing alternative text on product images; empty buttons and empty links; missing form labels and select elements without labels; broken ARIA references and invalid ARIA attributes; misused tab index values; missing first-level headings; improperly structured tables; and very low-contrast text that was unreadable to users with reduced contrast sensitivity, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction requiring Defendant to revise its corporate policies, practices, and procedures to ensure that its website becomes and remains fully accessible to blind and visually impaired users. Kith Retail, LLC operates the website that offers apparel and footwear items.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Robert Schonfeld, Esq. JOSEPH & NORINSBERG, LLC 825 Third Avenue, Suite 2100 New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 227-5700 Facsimile: (212) 656-1889 E-mail: rschonfeld@employeejustice.com KLOECKNER METALS: Kelley Balks at Unprotected Personal Info ----------------------------------------------------------- SHAMECA D. KELLEY, on her own behalf and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. KLOECKNER METALS CORPORATION, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-02706-VMC (N.D. Ga., May 14, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to properly secure and safeguard personal identifiable information potentially thousands of other individuals, including, but not limited to, name, address, and Social Security numbers. On April 10, 2026, Kloeckner announced that it identified unusual activity within their network. According to the complaint there was unauthorized access to the network between February 17 and February 23, 2026, and copies of certain files were taken. On March 13, Kloeckner determined that one or more files contained Plaintiff's name along with Social Security number. According to the complaint, the PII was compromised due to Defendant's negligent and/or careless acts and omissions and the failure to protect the Plaintiff's and Class members' PII. The Defendant has also purposefully maintained secret the specific vulnerabilities and root causes of the breach and have not informed Plaintiff and Class Members of that information. The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of all persons whose PII was compromised as a result of Defendant's failure to: (i) adequately protect the Plaintiff's and Class members' PII; (ii) warn Plaintiff and Class Members of Defendant's inadequate information security practices; and (iii) effectively secure hardware containing protected PII using reasonable and effective security procedures free of vulnerabilities and incidents. Defendant's conduct amounts to negligence and violates federal and state statutes. Kloeckner Metals Corporation is a steel and metal distributor based in Roswell, Georgia.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Casondra Turner, Esq. MILBERG PLLC 260 Peachtree Street NW, Suite 2200 Atlanta, GA 30303 Telephone: (771) 772-3086 E-mail: cturner@milberg.com - and - Marc H. Edelson, Esq. Liberato P. Verderame, Esq. EDELSON LECHTZIN LLP 411 S. State Street, Suite N-300 Newtown, PA 18940 Telephone: (215) 867-2399 Facsimile: (267) 685-0676 E-mail: medelson@edelson-law.com lverderame@edelson-law.com KOCH INC: JSB Farms Files Suit in N.D. Illinois ----------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Koch, Inc., et al. The case is styled as JSB Farms, LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Koch, Inc. formerly known as: Koch Industries, LLC.; Koch AG & Energy Solutions, LLC; Koch Fertilizer Wever, LLC Koch Fertilizer, LLC; Koch Agronomic Services, LLC; Nutrien Ltd.; NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.; The Mosaic Company; Canpotex Ltd.; CF Industries Holdings, Inc.; CF INDUSTRIES INC.; CF INDUSTRIES NITROGEN, LLC; Yara International ASA; Yara North America, Inc.; Case No. 1:26-cv-05759 (N.D. Ill., May 18, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Anti-Trust for Antitrust Litigation. Koch, Inc. -- https://www.kochinc.com/ -- (widely known as Koch Industries) is an American multinational conglomerate based in Wichita, Kansas.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Charles Robert Watkins, Esq. GUIN & EVANS, LLC 805 Lake Street, #226 Oak Park, IL 60301 Phone: (312) 878-8391 Fax: (205) 413-8716 Email: cwatkins@guinevans.com KOHL'S INC: Swarn Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ----------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kohl's, Inc. The case is styled as Robin Swarn, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Kohl's, Inc., Case No. 26CV190405 (Cal. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty., May 27, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Commercial/Business Tort (Not Fraud/ Breach of Contract)." Kohl's -- https://www.kohls.com/ -- (stylized in all caps) is an American department store retail chain, operated by Kohl's Corporation.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: James M. Treglio, Esq. POTTER HANDY LLP 100 Pine St., Ste. 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (858) 375-7385 Fax: (888) 422-5191 Email: jimt@potterhandy.com LAZ PARKING CALIFORNIA: Tatum Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against LAZ Parking California LLC. The case is styled as Turquoise L. Tatum, and all others similarly situated v. LAZ Parking California LLC, Does 1-10, Case No. 26CV012206 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., May 20, 2026). The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment." LAZ Parking -- https://www.lazparking.com/ -- offers convenient, cheap parking garages throughout the US.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Marcus J. Bradley, Esq. BRADLEY/GROMBACHER LLP 31365 Oak Crest Dr., Ste. 240 Westlake Village, CA 91361 Phone: 805-270-7100 Fax: 805-270-7589 Email: mbradley@bradleygrombacher.com LCT OPCO LLC: Wildman Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ----------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Matthew Wildman, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated v. LCT OpCo LLC, Case No. 26-2-13228-3, was removed from the Superior Court for the State of Washington in and for King County, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on May 22, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-01767. The Plaintiff alleges at least nine emails between 2023 and 2026 contained "false or misleading" subject lines. The Plaintiff further alleges the class is estimated to "minimally contain thousands of members."[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Samuel J. Strauss, Esq. Raina C. Borrelli, Esq. STRAUSS & BORRELLI PLLC 980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: (872) 263-1100 Fax: (872) 263-1109 Email: sam@straussborrelli.com raina@straussborrelli.com - and - Lynn A. Toops, Esq. Natalie A. Lyons, Esq. Ian R. Bensberg, Esq. COHEN & MALAD, LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: (317) 636-6481 Email: ltoops@cohenandmalad.com nlyons@cohenmalad.com ibensberg@cohenmalad.com - and - J. Gerard Stranch, IV, Esq. Michael C. Tackeff, Esq. Andrew K. Murray, Esq. STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC 223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200 Nashville, TN 37203 Phone: 615-254-8801 Email: gstranch@stranchlaw.com mtackeff@stranchlaw.com amurray@stranchlaw.com The Defendants are represented by: Lauren B. Rainwater, Esq. Rachel Herd, Esq. Quincy Rush, Esq. 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 Phone: 206.622.3150 Email: laurenrainwater@dwt.com rachelherd@dwt.com quincyrush@dwt.com LEGENDS BRAND: Vaughn Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ---------------------------------------------------------- Kendrick Vaughn, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. The Legends Brand, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-06315 (N.D. Ill., May 29, 2026), is brought against Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its Website https://www.legends.com/ (hereinafter "Website" or "the Website") to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired individuals. The Defendant is denying blind and visually impaired individuals throughout the United States equal access to the goods and services Defendant provides to their non-disabled customers through the Website. Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its Website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered, and in conjunction with its physical locations, is a violation of the Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA"). Because Defendant's Website is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures to that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. This complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is legally visually impaired and a member of a protected class under the ADA. The Defendant provides to the public the Website, which provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including, the ability to purchase a range of performance and lifestyle apparel, including tops, bottoms, jackets, shorts, leggings, base layers, and related accessories designed for comfort, mobility, and athletic or outdoor use.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Ohrenberger, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP PLLC 4903 Avenue N Brooklyn, NY 11234 Phone: 844-731-3343 Direct: 718-554-0237 Email: mohrenberger@ealg.law LEVOLOR INC: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Mueller Alleges --------------------------------------------------------------- TARA NICOLE MUELLER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Levolor, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-01078-JMS-MG (N.D. Ind., May 27, 2026) is a civil rights action against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website, https://levolor.com to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff Pelaez and other blind or visually-impaired individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act. According to the complaint, the website contains significant access barriers that make it difficult if not impossible for blind and visually-impaired customers to use the Website. In fact, the access barriers make it impossible for blind and visually-impaired users to even complete a transaction on the Website. Thus, Defendant excludes the blind and visually impaired from the full and equal participation in the growing Internet economy that is increasingly a fundamental part of the common marketplace and daily living, the suit says. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. The complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination. The Website is a commercial platform through which consumers can browse and offers products and services for online sale. The online store allows the user to view umbrellas and travel accessories, make purchases, and perform a variety of other functions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason B. Marshall, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (463) 777-4196 E-mail: jmarshall@ealg.law LG MEAT: Escolastico Seeks to Recover Managers' Unpaid Wages ------------------------------------------------------------ ANTOLIN JESUS LORA ESCOLASTICO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. LG MEAT PRODUCT CORP. d/b/a LG MEAT and EPIFANIO GUZMAN, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-04025 (S.D.N.Y., May 14, 2026) is a wage-and-hour and retaliation action to recover unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime compensation, unpaid spread-of-hours pay, unreimbursed expenses and/or expense-shifting amounts, statutory damages for wage-notice and wage-statement violations, liquidated damages, retaliation damages, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the New York Labor Law, and supporting regulations. The Plaintiff began working at the business in approximately May 2021 and continued working there until approximately September 22, 2025. Plaintiff's title was "manager," but he was not an owner, partner, or shareholder of the business. LG Meat Product Corp. d/b/a LG Meat Product operates as a neighborhood market and grocery store offering retail meat products.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Clifford Tucker, Esq. SACCO & FILLAS LLP 3119 Newtown Ave, Seventh Floor Astoria, NY 11102 Telephone: (718) 269-2243 Facsimile: (718) 559-6517 E-mail: CTucker@SaccoFillas.com LIVINGSTON COUNTY, NY: Vasquez Sues to Seek Compensation -------------------------------------------------------- Oscar Vasquez and Stella Vasquez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. LIVINGSTON COUNTY, New York, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No. 6:26-cv-06573 (S.D.N.Y., May 22, 2026), is brought seeking relief from New York governmental taxing authorities' practice of unconstitutionally taking Plaintiffs' and Plaintiff Class members' property for public use without providing just compensation. After Livingston County and the Defendant Class members foreclose on a property for taxes owed, they sell, retain, or transfer the property. But rather than keep the amount owed in taxes and reimburse the taxpayer the remaining balance, Livingston County and the Defendant Class members unconstitutionally take all the property including the "Surplus Proceeds," meaning the full amount of the sale proceeds or the full equity of the property above and beyond what was owed in taxes and associated fees. This lawsuit seeks to compensate Plaintiffs (and the Plaintiff Class members) for the taking of their Surplus Proceeds and ensure they (and the Plaintiff Class members) receive just compensation. Livingston County's and other similarly situated governmental taxing authorities' takings of Surplus Proceeds also violates the New York Constitution's prohibition on the taking of private property for public use without just compensation. This action seeks to certify a Plaintiff Class of New York property owners and those with an interest in property whose interests in the Surplus Proceeds were taken by Defendants and members of the Defendant Class, and to certify a Defendant Class of New York governmental taxing authorities that foreclosed on the Plaintiff Class members' property and kept the Surplus Proceeds, says the complaint. The Plaintiffs owned property in Livingston County. Livingston County is a municipal corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: George F. Carpinello, Esq. Jenna Smith, Esq. BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 30 South Pearl Street, 12th Floor Albany, NY 12207 Phone: (518) 434-0600 Fax: (518) 434-0665 Email: gcarpinello@bsfllp.com jsmith@bsfllp.com LOCCITANE INC: Shaw Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Loccitane, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Dominic Shaw, on behalf of herself and similarly situated aggrieved employees v. Loccitane, Inc., Does 1-10, Inclusive, Case No. 26STCV16398 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., May 21, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Non-Exempt Complaints (General Jurisdiction)." The L'OCCITANE Group -- https://www.loccitane.com/en-us/ -- is a leading international manufacturer and retailer of premium and sustainable beauty and wellness products.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gregory N. Karasik, Esq. KARASIK LAW FIRM 519 Arbramar Ave. Pacific Plsds, CA 90272-4216 Phone: 310-463-9761 Fax: 310-943-2582 Email: greg@karasiklawfirm.com - and - Sahag Majarian, II, Esq. 5869 Deerhead Rd. Malibu, CA 90265-3716 Phone: 818-609-0807 Fax: 818-609-0892 Email: sahagii@aol.com LUMEXA IMAGING: Fails to Safeguard Private Info, Ellison Says ------------------------------------------------------------- CARL ELLISON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. LUMEXA IMAGING, INC., Defendant, Case No. 5:26-CV-340 (E.D.N.C., May 19, 2026) arises from Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard private information that was entrusted to it, and its accompanying responsibility to store and transfer that information. The complaint relates that the Plaintiff and Class Members provided their Private Information to Defendant with the reasonable expectation and on the mutual understanding that Defendant would comply with its obligations to keep such information confidential and secure from unauthorized access. On April 9, 2026, Defendant was notified by one of its vendors about suspicious activity within a portion of its network dedicated to Defendant's affiliated radiology practices and imaging centers. On April 15, 2026, Defendant learned that an unauthorized person may have viewed or obtained copies of documents containing its affiliated radiology practices and imaging centers' patient information from the vendor's system. As a result of Defendant's inadequate digital security and notice process, Plaintiff's and Class Members' Private Information was exposed to criminals. Plaintiff and the Class Members have suffered and will continue to suffer injuries including: financial losses caused by misuse of their Private Information; the loss or diminished value of their Private Information as a result of the Data Breach; lost time associated with detecting and preventing identity theft; and theft of personal and financial information, adds the complaint. The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of all persons whose Private Information was compromised as a result of Defendant's failure to: (i) adequately protect the Private Information of Plaintiff and Class Members; (ii) warn Plaintiff and Class Members of Defendant's inadequate information security practices; (iii) effectively secure hardware containing protected Private Information using reasonable and adequate security procedures free of vulnerabilities and incidents; and (iv) timely notify Plaintiff and Class Members of the Data Breach. Plaintiff brings this action individually and on behalf of a Nationwide Class of similarly situated individuals against Defendant for: negligence; negligence per se; unjust enrichment, and breach of implied contract. Plaintiff Carl Ellison, a citizen and resident of Purcell, Oklahoma. Defendant Lumexa Imaging, Inc. is one of the nation's largest providers of outpatient diagnostic imaging services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott C. Harris, Esq. S. Michael Dunn, Esq. BRYSON HARRIS SUCIU & DEMAY PLLC 900 W. Morgan Street Raleigh, NC 27603 Telephone: (919) 600-5000 E-mail: sharris@brysonpllc.com mdunn@brysonpllc.com - and - Jeff Ostrow, Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW P.A. One W Las Olas Blvd, Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-4100 E-mail: ostrow@kolawyers.com MEDTRONIC INC: Holmes Sues Over Failure to Secure Personal Info --------------------------------------------------------------- DAVID HOLMES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MEDTRONIC, INC., Defendant, Case No. 0:26-cv-02618-DWF-DLM (D. Minn., May 14, 2026) is a class action against Medtronic for its failure to secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information of its current and former customers from a cyberattack which Medtronic announced on or about April 24, 2026. In or about April 2026, Medtronic discovered unauthorized activity on its network systems in which, upon information and belief, an unauthorized third party gained access to its network systems and obtained files containing the PII of Medtronic's current and former customers, including Plaintiff. As a result of Medtronic's inadequate security and breach of its duties and obligations, the data breach occurred, and Plaintiff's and Class members' PII was accessed and disclosed. This action seeks to remedy these failings and their consequences. The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and all persons whose PII was exposed as a result of the data breach. The Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all other Class members, asserts claims for negligence, negligence per se, and unjust enrichment, and seeks declaratory relief, injunctive relief, monetary damages, statutory damages, punitive damages, equitable relief, and all other relief authorized by law. Medtronic, Inc. is a medical device company that was founded in Minneapolis, Minnesota.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Melissa S. Weiner, Esq. Ryan T. Gott, Esq. PEARSON WARSHAW LLP 328 Barry Ave. S, Suite 200 Wayzata, MN 55391 Telephone: (612) 389-0600 Facsimile: (612) 389-0610 E-mail: mweiner@pwfirm.com rgott@pwfirm.com - and - Ben Barnow, Esq. Anthony L. Parkhill, Esq. BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. 205 West Randolph Street, Suite 1630 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 621-2000 Facsimile: (312) 641-5504 E-mail: b.barnow@barnowlaw.com aparkhill@barnowlaw.com MELALEUCA INC: Website Inaccessible to Blind Users, Dalton Says --------------------------------------------------------------- Julie Dalton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Melaleuca, Inc., Defendant, Case No. 0:26-cv-02622-ECT-ECW (D. Minn., May 14, 2026) arises because Defendant's website, www.melaleuca.com is not fully and equally accessible to Plaintiff and other people who are blind or who have low vision in violation of both the general non-discriminatory mandate and the effective communication and auxiliary aids and services requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff found Defendant's website has a number of digital barriers that deny screen-reader users like Plaintiff full and equal access to important website content -- content Defendant makes available to its sighted website users. In addition to her claim under the ADA, the Plaintiff also asserts a companion cause of action under the Minnesota Human Rights Act. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction requiring a change in Defendant's corporate policies to cause its online store to become, and remain, accessible to individuals with visual disabilities; a civil penalty payable to the state of Minnesota. Melaleuca, Inc. operates the website that offers wellness products for sale including, but not limited to, supplements, cleaning and laundry supplies, personal care, beauty products, food, drinks, essential oils, and more.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Patrick W. Michenfelder, Esq. Chad A. Throndset, Esq. Jason Gustafson, Esq. THRONDSET MICHENFELDER, LLC 80 S. 8th Street, Suite 900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (763) 515-6110 E-mail: pat@throndsetlaw.com chad@throndsetlaw.com jason@throndsetlaw.com METROPLEX TRADING: Popowicz Removed from State Court to E.D. Pa. ---------------------------------------------------------------- The class action lawsui captioned as Justin Popowicz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Metroplex Trading Company LLC d/b/a Grabagun, Case No. 2026-08037-0 (Filed May 4, 2026) was removed from the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on May 26, 2026. The Plaintiff asserts claims under the Pennsylvania Wiretapping Act and the Uniform Firearms Act, specifically, the Plaintiff alleges that by hosting Listrak and Google source code on its website, the Defendant "is essentially handing [its] Website users a tapped device." The Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's website hosts code for Google [and Listrak], which allows Google [and Listrak] to intercept consumers' electronic communications, including communications that contain confidential information about their firearms purchases. The Plaintiff further alleges that "by unlawfully disclosing sensitive and protected information to Google and Listrak, the Defendant invaded the personal privacy of Plaintiff and members of the class." The Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages, statutory damages, punitive damages and injunctive relief, plus attorneys' fees and costs, on behalf of himself and a putative class ,the suit says. Metroplex is a Coppell, Texas-based firearms and outdoor accessories retailer that operates the e-commerce platform GrabAGun.[BN] The Defendant is represented by: Mark D. Bradshaw, Esq. STEVENS & LEE, P.C 17 North Second Street, 16th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101 Telephone: (717) 255-7357 E-mail: mark.bradshaw@stevenslee.com - and - Bradley W. Foster, Esq. Carrington M. Giammittorio, Esq. HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 2801 N. Harwood St., Suite 2300 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 651-5000 E-mail: Brad.Foster@haynesboone.com Carrington.Giammittorio@haynesboone.com MORGAN & MICHAELS: Faces Suit Over Alleged Abusive Debt Collection ------------------------------------------------------------------ BABI RADOUANE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated V. MORGAN & MICHAELS, LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-05971 (D.N.J., May 26, 2026) alleges that the Defendants violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. At some time prior to May 21, 2025, the Plaintiff allegedly incurred a financial obligation to Big Apple Mold Removal. The Big Apple obligation arose out of a transaction, in which money, property, insurance or services, which are the subject of the transaction, are primarily for personal, family or household purposes. On or before May 21, 2025, the Big Apple obligation was referred to the Defendant for the purpose of collections. The Defendants violated FDCPA by falsely implying that they had the right or legal authority to commence a civil lawsuit to attempt to collect the debt from Plaintiff and others similarly situated, says the suit. Morgan is a Florida-based debt collection agency.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph K. Jones, Esq. Benjamin J. Wolf, Esq. WHITEFORD TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP 375 Passaic Avenue, Suite 100 Fairfield, New Jersey 07004 Telephone: (973) 227-5900 Facsimile: (973) 244-0019 E-mail: jjones@whitefordlaw.com bwolf@whitefordlaw.com MULHOLLAND SECURITY: Faces Diaz Class Suit in Cal. Super. --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Mulholland Security Centers, LLC. The case is captioned as MANUEL DIAZ, individually, and on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. MULHOLLAND SECURITY CENTERS, LLC, Case No. 26STCV15738 (Cal., Super., Los Angeles Cty., May 15, 2026). The nature of suit states Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction). MULHOLLAND SECURITY CENTERS, LLC manufactures and installs custom-built gates, fences, railings, and pergolas.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jose Renato Garay, Esq. JOSE GARAY APLC Website: www.garaylaw.com 249 E Ocean Blvd Ste 814 Long Beach, CA 90802-4899 Telephone: (949) 208-3400 Facsimile: (562) 590-8400 E-mail: jose@garaylaw.com NATIONAL MENTOR: Schmidt Files Suit Over Unlawful Tobacco Surcharge ------------------------------------------------------------------- ANNE M. SCHMIDT and AMBER N. GUTHRIE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs vs. NATIONAL MENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a SEVITA HEALTH, Defendant, Case No. 0:26-cv-02614-LMP-DTS (D. Minn., May 14, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for its unlawful practice of charging a "tobacco surcharge" under the Sevita Welfare Benefits Plan (the "Plan") without complying with the regulatory requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") and the implementing regulations. Defendant National Mentor Holdings, LLC d/b/a Sevita Health provides community-based services for people with injuries and disabilities. Defendant, as Plan Administrator, is a fiduciary of the Plan who had, and continues to have, a legal obligation to act in the best interests of Plan participants and to comply with federal law. Plaintiffs are current and former employees and participants in the Plan who paid unlawful surcharges to maintain health insurance coverage under the Plan, says the complaint. Specifically, the complaint alleges that outcome-based programs, such as being tobacco-free or completing a smoking cessation program, must offer a clearly defined "reasonable alternative standard," which is an alternative way for "all similarly situated individuals" to obtain the reward (or avoid a penalty) if they are unable to meet the initial wellness program standard (i.e., being tobacco-free). Defendant violates these requirements by failing to notify participants in any Plan materials that a physician's recommendation will be accommodated, and by failing to disclose the tobacco surcharge or describe the wellness program. This Complaint alleges that Defendant imposes a health-based tobacco surcharge without making available a compliant alternative standard to avoid the surcharge. This surcharge imposed an additional financial burden on Plaintiffs and continues to impose such a burden on those similarly situated. Participants like Plaintiffs are, in the least, permitted to challenge the failure of an employer to include critical information about participants' rights in the materials that are shown to them during enrollment. The Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit individually and on behalf of all similarly situated Plan participants and beneficiaries, seeking to recover these unlawfully charged fees and for plan-wide equitable relief to prevent Sevita from continuing to profit from its violations under ERISA. Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the Plan as a whole, seeks appropriate equitable relief under ERISA to address Defendant's ongoing violations of ERISA's anti-discrimination provisions.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Philip J. Krzeski, Esq. CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA 100 Washington Ave S, Ste 1700 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Telephone: (612) 339-7300 E-mail: pkrzeski@chestnutcambronne.com - and - Oren Faircloth, Esq. William H. Payne, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 100 Pearl St, 14th Floor - #16946876 Hartford, CT 06103 Telephone: (212) 532-1091 E-mail: ofaircloth@sirillp.com wpayne@sirillp.com NEW YORK, NY: Illegally Imprisoned Detainees, Ruiz Suit Alleges --------------------------------------------------------------- MICHAEL RUIZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK; KATHY HOCHUL, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVENOR AND INDIVIDUALLY; THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; and HON. ALVIN BRAGG, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND INDIVIDUALLY, Case No. 1:26-cv-04018-DEH (S.D.N.Y., May 14, 2026) alleges that the Defendants illegally detaining, imprisoning, and otherwise restraining pre-trial detainees, who are being held on a fugitive warrants from other states, more than thirty days after they have waived extradition, without the governor signing an authorization, pursuant to the New York Criminal Procedure Law. Accordingly, absent specific authorization from the governor, pursuant to CPL section 570.44, however, the Defendants have 30 days, from the date on which a detainee being held on a fugitive warrant signs a waiver of extradition, to either release such detainee or deliver such detainee to the demanding state. The Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order certifying the action as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and b(2) and b(3) for the class. Plaintiff Ruiz is an individual residing in the City and State of New York. He was a pretrial detainee who was detained at Rikers Island by the New York City Department of Corrections. The Defendants Kathy Hochul, is the Governor of the State of New York.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joel M. Rubenstein, Esq. GERMAN RUBENSTEIN LLP 19 West 44th Street, Suite 1500 New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 704-2020 NSMG SHARED: Faces Johnson Class Suit in Cal. Super. Court ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against NSMG SHARED SERVICES LLC. The case is captioned as KELLY JOHNSON, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated vs. NSMG SHARED SERVICES LLC, Case No. 26CV188617 (Cal. Super., Alameda Cty., Filed May 15, 2026). The case is assigned to the Hon. Judge S. Raj Chatterjee. The nature of suit states Employment Complaint Case. An initial case management conference is set on Nov. 2, 2026. NSMG is the corporate and administrative hub for NorthStar Memorial Group, a privately held operator of funeral homes, cemeteries, and crematories across the United States.[BN] The Defendant is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. LAVI & EBRAHIMIAN, LLP Website: www.lelawfirm.com 8889 W Olympic Blvd. Ste. 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211-3638 Telephone: (310) 432-0000 Facsimile: (310) 432-0001 E-mail: jlavi@lelawfirm.com NUTRIEN LTD: Robert & Donna Alleges Fertilizers' Price Conspiracy ----------------------------------------------------------------- ROBERT AND DONNA KOON D/B/A EDGE WOOD DAIRY, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiff v. NUTRIEN LTD.; NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS; THE MOSAIC CO.; MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC; CANPOTEX LTD.; CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC.; CF INDUSTRIES, INC.; KOCH, INC. F/K/A KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC.; KOCH AG & ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC; KOCH FERTILIZER LLC; KOCH AGRONOMIC SERVICES, LLC; YARA INTERNATIONAL ASA; YARA NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendants, Case No. 4:26-cv-00418-BCW (W.D. Mo., May 14, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for alleged violations of the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. The Defendants are a collection of the largest fertilizer companies that produce, manufacture, supply, and sell fertilizers that use (individually or in combination) nitrogen (N), potash (P), and phosphate (K) for agricultural cultivation (referred to collectively in this complaint as "NPK Fertilizers." Starting on or around January 1, 2020, the Defendants entered into an agreement, combination, or conspiracy to limit the supply and fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize prices of NPK Fertilizers sold in the United States at supracompetitive levels. The Plaintiffs and the Class have paid artificially inflated prices for NPK Fertilizers for over six years as a result of Defendants' unlawful conduct. The complaint asserts that the Defendants' agreement and the conspiracy in furtherance thereof have enabled Defendants to increase their profit margins exponentially, while forcing Plaintiffs and Class Members to pay inflated prices even when market conditions do not predict or deliver net crop income. Defendants maintain elevated prices without concern that their competitors will try to steal their market share or for potential new market entrants because high barriers to entry prevent new competitors from entering the market. Through the conduct alleged herein, the Defendants have materially reduced or eliminated the historical boom-and-bust cycle of the agriculture industry and fixed fertilizer prices during a period of rapidly falling input costs by, inter alia, coordinating prices among them, says the suit. Plaintiffs Robert and Donna Koon d/b/a Edge-Wood Dairy are independent dairy farmers located in Berryville, Virginia. Nutrien Ltd. is a Canadian fertilizer company based in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Bryan T. White, Esq. Gene P. Graham, Jr., Esq. WHITE, GRAHAM, BUCKLEY, & CARR, LLC 19049 East Valley View Parkway, Ste. C Independence, MO 64055 Telephone: (816) 373-9080 Facsimile: (816) 373-9319 E-mail: ggraham@wagblaw.com bwhite@wagblaw.com - and - Joseph J. DePalma, Esq. LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG & AFANADOR, LLC 570 Broad Street, Suite 1201 Newark, NJ 07102 Telephone: (973) 623-3000 E-mail: jdepalma@litedepalma.com - and - Laura K. Mummert, Esq. Steven J. Greenfogel, Esq. LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG & AFANADOR, LLC 1515 Market Street, Suite 1200 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Telephone: (267) 314-7980 E-mail: lmummert@litedepalma.com sgreenfogel@litedepalma.com PASTA D'ORO: Pineda Seeks Unpaid OT Compensation Under FLSA ----------------------------------------------------------- JOSE PINEDA, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons v. PASTA D'ORO, LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-04350 (S.D.N.Y., May 26, 2026) is a collective action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) against the Defendants to recover unpaid overtime compensation. Mr. Pineda brings these claims on behalf of himself, and all other similarly situated current and former Pasta D’Oro employees who were paid a day rate within the three years preceding the filing of a consent to sue. The Plaintiff Pineda also brings claims under New York's wage-and-hour laws, including New York Labor Law Articles 6 and 19 and their implementing regulations, both individually and as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (New York Class) for Defendants' failure to pay overtime wages for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek; failure to pay applicable New York State minimum wages; failure to pay spread of hours wages; failure to provide a wage notice upon hiring, and failure provide accurate wage statement, the suit says. Mr. Pineda worked at Pasta D'Oro as a dishwasher from 2024 until early April 2026. Pasta D'Oro is a restaurant located in Wurtsboro, New York opened in 2019.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Victoria Morrell, Esq. Matt Dunn, Esq. GETMAN, SWEENEY & DUNN, PLLC 260 Fair Street Kingston, NY 12401 Telephone: (845) 255-9370 E-mail: vmorrell@getmansweeney.com mdunn@getmansweeney.com PPG INDUSTRIES: Faces Bravo Class Suit in Cal. Super. ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against PPG Industries, Inc. The case is captioned as Guillermo Bravo v. PPG Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation registered to do business in the State of California, et al., Case No. 26CUB01906 (Cal. Super., Kern County, Filed May 15, 2026). The case is assigned to the Hon. Judge Gregory A. Pulskamp. The nature states Employment related violations. PPG is a supplier of paints, coatings, and specialty materials headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.[BN] The Plaintiff Guillermo Bravo on behalf of all others similarly situated is represented by: Justin Lo, Esq. Work Lawyers PC 22939 Hawthorne Blvd Unit 300 Torrance, CA 90505-3682 Telephone: (310) 248-2944 Website: www.caworklawyer.com QUIJOTE RESTAURANT: Faces Hernandez Wage-and-Hour Suit in E.D.N.Y. ------------------------------------------------------------------ EMMA HERNANDEZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. QUIJOTE RESTAURANT, INC. (d/b/a DON QUIJOTE RESTAURANT) and BLAIJER LOPEZ, individually, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-02904 (E.D.N.Y., May 14, 2026) is a wage-and-hour action arising out of Defendants' systematic and willful failure to pay Plaintiff and other similarly situated non-exempt restaurant employees the overtime compensation required by the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law, together with associated provisions of Title 12 of the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations, including the Hospitality Industry Wage Order. The Plaintiff worked as a cook at Defendants' restaurant in Miller Place, New York, for approximately six years. Throughout her employment, the Plaintiff regularly worked approximately 58 hours per week. The Defendants paid Plaintiff through a two-track compensation scheme designed to conceal the magnitude of her overtime work and to evade the lawful overtime premium. The Defendants paid Plaintiff for 40 hours each week -- or fewer -- by payroll check, with accompanying paystubs that reflected only those payroll hours. The Defendants paid Plaintiff for the additional, off-the-books hours she worked each week separately in cash. In addition to unpaid overtime, the Plaintiff worked an eleven-hour spread of hours on Fridays and Saturdays, entitling her to additional spread-of-hours pay under the state law, which Defendants did not pay, says the suit. Further, the Defendants failed to provide Plaintiff with a written wage notice at hire and failed to provide accurate wage statements at the time of each payment of wages as required by NYLL. Quijote Restaurant, Inc. is a Spanish restaurant in New York.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Lina Stillman, Esq. STILLMAN LEGAL, P.C. 42 Broadway, 12th Floor New York, NY 10004 Telephone: (212) 832-1000 REVISE HOME: Foley Seeks Lost Wages Following Termination --------------------------------------------------------- Zachary Foley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Revise Home Energy Solutions, Inc. f/k/a DiPietro Home Energy Solutions, Inc. and Joseph A. DiPietro, Defendants, Case No. 2677CV00627C (Comm. Mass., May 19, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for failing to pay terminated employees all wages due on the date of termination. The complaint relates that the Defendant terminated Plaintiff on May 15, 2026, and did not pay him his wages that were due to him as of the date of his termination, including accrued and unused PTO. The Plaintiff alleges that he has suffered and continues to suffer lost wages and benefits as a result of his unlawful termination. Accordingly, the Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and the putative class, seeks to recover all unpaid wages, statutory treble damages, attorneys' fees and costs, prejudgment interest, and any other relief permitted by law. Plaintiff Zachary Foley is a resident of Ipswich, Massachusetts and is employed by the Defendants out of Haverhill, Massachusetts. Plaintiff had been employed by Revise for seven years, most recently as a Regional Manager. Defendant Revise Home Energy Solutions, Inc., a Massachusetts domestic profit corporation, is a so-called Mass Save Partner that performs insulation and HVAC services for customers who receive home energy assessments through the Mass Save program. Defendant Joseph A. DiPietro is the President and Treasurer of Revise Home Energy Solutions, Inc., and was the President Treasurer of DiPietro Home Energy Solutions, Inc.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Adam J. Shafran, Esq. RUDOLPH FRIEDMANN LLP 92 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: 617-723-7700 Facsimile: 617-227-0313 E-mail: ashafran@rflawyers.com ROCKET MORTGAGE: Faces long Suit Over Unwanted Text Messages ------------------------------------------------------------ Shannel Long, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC, Case No. 2:26-cv-05599 (C.D. Cal., May 26, 2026) contends that the Defendant promotes and markets its merchandise, in part, by sending unsolicited text messages to wireless phone users, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief to halt Defendant's illegal conduct, which has resulted in the invasion of privacy, harassment, aggravation, and disruption of the daily life of thousands of individuals. The Plaintiff also seeks statutory damages on behalf of himself and members of the class, and any other available legal or equitable remedies. Rocket Mortgage, formerly Quicken Loans, LLC, is an American mortgage lender, headquartered in Detroit, Michigan. Rocket Mortgage uses wholesale funding for loans and online applications as opposed to a branch system.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Vinit R. Venkatesh, Esq. PLG DAMAGE ATTORNEYS 2750 Sw 145th Avenue No. 509 Miramar, FL 33027 E-mail: service@plgdamage.com ROCKY BRANDS: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Mueller Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------------- TARA NICOLE MUELLER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Rocky Brands, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-01079-JPH-MG (N.D. Ind., May 27, 2026) is a civil rights action against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website, https://georgiaboot.com to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff Pelaez and other blind or visually-impaired individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act. According to the complaint, the website contains significant access barriers that make it difficult if not impossible for blind and visually-impaired customers to use the Website. In fact, the access barriers make it impossible for blind and visually-impaired users to even complete a transaction on the Website. Thus, Defendant excludes the blind and visually impaired from the full and equal participation in the growing Internet economy that is increasingly a fundamental part of the common marketplace and daily living, the suit says. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. The complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination. The Website is a commercial platform through which consumers can browse and offers products and services for online sale. The online store allows the user to view umbrellas and travel accessories, make purchases, and perform a variety of other functions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason B. Marshall, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (463) 777-4196 E-mail: jmarshall@ealg.law ROYALTON ON THE GREENS: Orgera Seeks Rule 23 Class Certification ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as WILLIAM ORGERA, v. MICHAEL EINHORN, MIKHAIL TAKHALOV, JORGE FERNANDEZ, ROYALTON ON THE GREENS, LLC d/b/a THE ROYALTON ON THE GREENS, JEM CATERERS OF ROSLYN, LTD d/b/a THE ROYALTON ROSLYN COUNTRY CLUB, and ROYALTON MANAGEMENT INC., Case No. 2:25-cv-590-ST (E.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order as follows: (i) certify a Class, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Rule 23"), consisting of: "Servers working at the Royalton Properties during a specified time period." (ii) appoint the Plaintiff as class representative, (iii) appoint the Plaintiff's Counsel as class counsel, and (iv) authorize dissemination of class notice. The Plaintiff’s motion should be granted because the Defendants, acting under a uniform policy and practice amongst their enterprise, encouraged clients to give gratuities directly to management, who misappropriated said gratuities, causing injury to over forty waiters, bartenders, hostesses and runners ("Waitstaff"). The Plaintiff commenced this action to recover gratuities that the Defendants collected from clients but willfully and intentionally failed to disburse to the Defendants' tipped employees, and failed to notify the tipping patrons and the Defendants of such in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the "FLSA"), and New York Labor Law ("NYLL"). The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendants as a part-time bartender from 2017 until January 2023. Royalton is a private wedding, catering and event space. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated May 22, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=WdevI4 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Zachary C. Naidich, Esq. NAIDICH LAW 123 5th Avenue, 5th Fl. New York, NY 10010 Telephone: (646) 661-5694 E-mail: znaidich@naidichlaw.com - and - Mitchell Segal, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL S. SEGAL 1129 Northern Boulevard, Suite 404 Manhasset, New York, NY 10030 Telephone: (516) 415-0100 E-mail: msegal@segallegal.com SELECTQUOTE INSURANCE: Esparza Files Suit for Invasion of Privacy ----------------------------------------------------------------- MIGUEL ESPARZA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. SELECTQUOTE INSURANCE SERVICES, a California corporation, d/b/a SELECTQUOTE.COM, Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-03136-TWR-MSB (S.D. Cal., May 19, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for unlawful spamming and invasion of privacy. According to the complaint, spam e-mail received by the Plaintiff from the Defendant is an "Unsolicited Commercial e-mail advertisement" because Plaintiff had no pre-existing relationship with Defendant, and because the e-mail was initiated for the purpose of advertising or promoting a lease, sale, rental, gift offer, or other disposition of any property, goods, services, or extension of credit. Likewise, Plaintiff has never given "direct consent" to receive commercial e-mail advertisements from Defendant or its marketing agents. The spam violates the California Business & Professions Code and the California Trap and Trace Law, says the complaint. But complaint further notes that it is the second step that makes the conduct especially vile: once the user is lured onto the website under false pretenses, tracking pixels and similar technologies are silently deployed to harvest data, monitor behavior, and follow the user across the internet without their knowledge or permission. This is a calculated bait-and-switch that converts deception into durable exploitation, transforming a one-time click into a persistent invasion of privacy. Both the spam and the surveillance are illegal under California law, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks judgment against Defendant for all available declaratory, legal, and equitable relief including injunctive relief; for statutory damages; for punitive damages; for attorneys' fees and costs as allowed by law; and for any and all other relief at law or equity that may be appropriate. Plaintiff MIGUEL ESPARZA is a California citizen and is the owner of the e-mail address recruitforce1@gmail.com. He has received countless misleading spam e-mail advertising from Defendant with a forged header, spoofed domain, and deceptive subject line. Defendant SELECTQUOTE INSURANCE SERVICES d/b/a SELECTQUOTE.COM is an insurance marketing company incorporated in Delaware. The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott J. Ferrell, Esq. Victoria C. Knowles, Esq. PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS A Professional Corporation 4100 Newport Place Drive, Ste. 800 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (949) 706-6464 Facsimile: (949) 706-6469 E-mail: sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com vknowles@pacifictrialattorneys.com SHERWIN-WILLIAMS MANUFACTURING: Faces Modrovich Suit in W.D. Pa. ---------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company. The case is captioned as Christina Modrovich and Robert Birner, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company, Case No. 2:26-cv-00920-KT (W.D. Pa., May 14, 2026). The case is assigned to the Hon. Magistrate Judge Kezia O.L. Taylor. The nature of suit states Torts to Land demanding $5MM in damag-es. Sherwin-Williams manufactures and distributes paints, stains, and protective finishes.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Kevin S. Riechelson, Esq. COHEN & RIECHELSON 3500 Quakerbridge Road, Suite 203 Hamilton, NJ 08619 Telephone: (609) 394-8585 Facsimile: (609) 394-8620 E-mail: kriechelson@crlawoffices.com STIIIZY INC: Faces Suit Over Data Privacy Violations ---------------------------------------------------- A.G.; B.R.; and R.M., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. STIIIZY, INC., Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-05089 (C.D. Cal., May 12, 2026) alleges Defendant's violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. According to the Plaintiffs in the complaint, in installing the invisible trackers, including the Meta Pixel, Google Analytics, Google DoubleClick, and Lotame tracking codes ("Tracking Technologies"), the Defendant chose to allow third parties to identify specific users and monitor every step of their activity on the Website including which pages and cannabis products they view, which STIIIZY products they add to their carts, and what they purchase. When using the STIIIZY Website, Plaintiffs did not anticipate or consent to the use of extensive tracking technology that would transmit personal health information to dozens of third party data brokers and other unauthorized companies, says the suit. STIIIZY Inc. operates as a cannabis company. The Company provides cannabis products including botanically derived terpenes, live resins, disposable vape devices, pods, cannabis extracts, and infused edibles. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Victor J. Sandoval, Esq. ALMEIDA LAW GROUP LLC 3415 S Sepulveda Suite 1121 Los Angeles, CA 90034 Telephone: (562) 534-5907 Email: victor@almeidalawgroup.com - and - Arturo Pena Miranda, Esq. STERLINGTON, PLLC 228 Park Avenue South, No. 97956 New York, NY 10003 Telephone: (212) 433-2993 E: arturo.pena@sterlingtonlaw.com SUNDAY RILEY: Robertson Class Suit Removed to C.D. Cal. ------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as FRANCINE ROBERTSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs vs. SUNDAY RILEY MODERN SKINCARE, LLC, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV11996, was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division on May 22, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-05574 to the proceeding. The complaint asserts, on behalf of Plaintiff and the putative class of California consumers she purports to represent, claims for violation of California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act, False Advertising Law, and Unfair Competition Law arising from Sunday Riley's advertising, labeling, and marketing of certain skincare products as "clean," "sustainable," and "planet friendly," as well as alleged "detox" and "microbiome" benefits associated with certain products. Sunday Riley Modern Skincare, LLC provides skin improvement and wellness products.[BN] The Defendant is represented by: Dennis S. Ellis, Esq. Katherine F. Murray, Esq. Nora Z. Naccachian, Esq. ELLIS GEORGE LLP 2121 Avenue of the Stars, 30th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 274-7100 Facsimile: (310) 275-5697 E-mail: dellis@ellisgeorge.com kmurray@ellisgeorge.com nnaccachian@ellisgeorge.com TITAN BRANDS: Faces Kirkman Class Suit in W.D. Wash. ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Titan Brands Inc. The case is captioned as Evan Kirkman and Aaron Smith, on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Titan Brands Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-01660-JNW (W.D. Wash., May 15, 2026). The case is assigned to the Hon. Judge Jamal N. Whitehead. The nature of suit states Other Fraud. Titan is an online-based retailer of consumer and small business goods.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Brook Garberding, Esq. Michael Anderson Berry, Esq. EMERY REDDY PC 600 STEWART ST., Ste 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 442-9106 E-mail: brook@emeryreddy.com anderson@emeryreddy.com The Defendant is represented by: Lori A Medley, Esq. Courtney McFate, Esq. EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN (NY) 875 Third Ave New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 351-4500 Facsimile: (212) 878-8600 E-mail: lmedley@ebglaw.com CMcFate@ebglaw.com TRANSGLOBAL HOLDING: Fails to Secure Personal Info, Martinez Says ----------------------------------------------------------------- FERNANDO MARTINEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. TRANSGLOBAL HOLDING CO., and TRANSGLOBAL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-01603 (D. Nev., May 26, 2026) is a class action against TransGlobal for its failure to properly secure and safeguard sensitive information that customers of the Defendant entrusted to it, including, without limitation, individuals' names, addresses, Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, dates of birth, and financial account information. On February 18, 2026, TransGlobal experienced a data breach, during which cybercriminals accessed or acquired the above-referenced PII (the Data Breach). Prior to and through February 18, 2026, TransGlobal obtained the PII of Plaintiff and Class Members. Prior to and through February 18, 2026, TransGlobal stored Plaintiff's and Class Members' PII in an internet-accessible environment on TransGlobal's network. By obtaining, collecting, using, and deriving a benefit from the Plaintiff's and Class Members' PII, TransGlobal assumed legal and equitable duties to those individuals to protect and safeguard that information from unauthorized access and intrusion. The exposed PII of Plaintiff and Class Members can be sold on the dark web. Hackers can access and then offer unencrypted, unredacted PII for sale to criminals, says the suit. The Plaintiff and Class Members now face a life-long risk of (i) identity theft and (ii) the sharing and detrimental use of their sensitive information. The PII was compromised due to TransGlobal's negligent and/or careless acts and omissions and its failure to protect Plaintiff’s and Class Members' PII. In addition to TransGlobal's failure to prevent the Data Breach, TransGlobal waited more than two months after the Data Breach occurred to report it to Plaintiff and Class Members. TransGlobal claims to provide "cutting-edge risk management solutions to businesses across multiple states in the U.S." Its principal address is in Las Vegas, Nevada.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: William T. Sykes, Esq. Michael J. Gayan, Esq. Erica C. Medley, Esq. CLAGGETT & SYKES LAW FIRM 1160 N. Town Center Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NE 89144 - and - Bart D. Cohen, Esq. Panida A. Anderson, Esq. BAILEY & GLASSER, LLP 1055 Thomas Jefferson St NW, Ste 540 Washington, DC 20007 - and - David D. Bibiyan, Esq. Jennifer Lee, Esq. BIBIYAN LAW GROUP, P.C. 1460 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90024 VERTLY LLC: Ortiz Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind ---------------------------------------------------------- JOSEPH ORTIZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. VERTLY, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-00972 (W.D.N.Y., May 12, 2026) alleges violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant's Web site, www.vertlybalm.com is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, including the Plaintiff, in violation of the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Web site will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. Verity, LLC provides accounting services. The Company offers business and asset valuations, book keeping, significant data analysis, forensic accounting, and related auditing services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Tel: (212) 228-9795 Fax: (212) 982-6284 Email: Jeffrey@Gottlieb.legal Dana@Gottlieb.legal Michael@Gottlieb.legal VISTA MYRTLE: Property Inaccessible to Disabled People, Suit Says ----------------------------------------------------------------- NIGEL FRANK DE LA TORRE PARDO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. VISTA MYRTLE BEACH HOTEL LP D/B/A HAMPTON INN MIAMI AIRPORT WEST, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-23337-CMA (S.D. Fla., May 12, 2026) alleges violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendants' commercial hotel property at 3620 NW 79th Avenue, Doral, Florida, 33166, is not accessible to mobility-impaired individuals in violation of ADA. Vista Myrtle Beach Hotel LP d/b/a Hampton Inn Miami Airport West owns and operates motels and hotels. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony J. Perez, Esq. ANTHONY J. PEREZ LAW GROUP, PLLC 7950 W. Flagler Street, Suite 104 Miami, Florida 33144 Telephone: (786) 361-9909 Facsimile: (786) 687-0445 Primary E-Mail: ajp@ajperezlawgroup.com Secondary E-Mails: jr@ajperezlawgroup.com mds@ajperezlawgroup.com WALT DISNEY: Faces Douay Suit Over Use of Synthetic Fragrance ------------------------------------------------------------- KATELYN DOUAY, DAWN O'BRIEN, ELLIOTT MAYER, and CHRISTINA CULBERTSON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, Case No. 8:26-cv-01385 (C.D. Cal., May 29, 2026) seeks remedies for the Defendant's practice of employing synthetic fragranced consumer product in it facilities -- despite knowledge of the realities and the discriminatory effect of these practices. Accordingly, despite actual or constructive knowledge of the toxic properties of synthetic fragranced consumer products, Defendant flooded its common and private areas with said products, thereby showering unsuspecting customers, employees, guests and/or patrons with substances known to cause respiratory problems, headaches, skin irritation, and adverse gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and cognitive reactions, the suit contends The "synthetic fragranced consumer product" is a base product to which synthetic fragrance compounds are then added and/or is a product that is largely comprised of fragrance. Synthetic fragranced consumer products, are used regularly by hotels, banks, restaurants, wineries, medical and dental facilities, brick and mortal retail stores and a multitude of other businesses across a host of industries to impart what they purport to be a pleasant, or at least unique, aroma and/or to mask unpleasant odors, and mold, says the suit. The Representative Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the provisions of Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(b)(1) and/or Rule 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, individually, and on behalf of the following injunctive and/or equitable relief Classes: The "Nationwide Class" "All chemically sensitive (disabled) persons residing within the United States of America who, as a result of their disabled status, and due to Defendant's use of Synthetic fragranced consumer products, were denied safe, full and equal access and enjoyment to/of Defendant's Facilities, and hereby seek to enjoin Defendant (as set forth the Prayer for Relief herein) from using Synthetic fragranced consumer products at Defendant's Facilities. The "California Non-Unruh Class" "All chemically sensitive (disabled) persons residing in the State of California who, as a result of their disabled status, and due to Defendant’s use of Synthetic fragranced consumer products, were denied safe, full and equal access and enjoyment to/of Defendant’s Facilities, and hereby seek to enjoin Defendant (as set forth the Prayer for Relief herein) from using Synthetic fragranced consumer products at Defendant's Facilities." The Representative Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the provisions of Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, individually, and on behalf of the following damages Class: The "California Unruh Class" "All chemically sensitive (disabled) persons residing in the State of California who, as a result of their disabled status, and due to Defendant’s use of Synthetic fragranced consumer products, were denied safe, full and equal access and enjoyment to/of Defendant’s Facilities, and hereby seek to recover damages from Defendant, pursuant to the Unruh Civil Rights Act." The Defendant claims to offer lodging, restaurant and bar service, pool and theme park facilities to the general public, including Representative Plaintiffs, and markets its facilities as being available equally to all members of that public, and yet, engages in practices that prohibit a substantial segment of that public (i.e., chemically sensitive disabled individuals) from the same benefits and opportunities of those facilities afforded to other individuals.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott Edward Cole, Esq. Laura G. Van Note, Esq. Mark T. Freeman, Esq. COLE & VAN NOTE 555 12th Street, Suite 2100 Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 891-9800 Facsimile: (510) 891-7030 E-mail: sec@colevannote.com lvn@colevannote.com mtf@colevannote.com WEST PHARMACEUTICAL: Fails to Secure Personal Info, Lussier Says ---------------------------------------------------------------- EMILIE LUSSIER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-03578 (E.D. Pa., May 26, 2026) is a class action lawsuit against Defendant for its negligent failure to protect and safeguard Plaintiff's and Class Members' highly sensitive personally identifiable information culminating in a massive and preventable data breach. On May 4, 2026, West discovered a network system issue that it determined on May 7, 2026 was a cyberattack, which allowed unauthorized cybercriminals gained access to Defendant's inadequately protected computer system and Plaintiff's and the Class Member's Private Information stored thereon. As part of its business practices and to provide employment and services, Defendant collects, stores, and maintains employees' PII, including Plaintiff's and Class Members'. Plaintiff and Class Members are current and former employees of Defendant. Accordingly, the Defendant has not disclosed publicly what threat actor was involved. West reported in a May 7 Form 8-K submission to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission that it suffered a "material cybersecurity attack, in which certain data was exfiltrated by an unauthorized party and certain systems were encrypted." As a result of Defendant's failure to implement reasonable and necessary data security practices, cybercriminals easily infiltrated Defendant's inadequately protected computer systems and stole the Private Information of Plaintiff and Class Members, the suit says. West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. is a designer and manufacturer of injectable pharmaceutical packaging and delivery systems.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Andrew W. Ferich, Esq. AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 201 King of Prussia Road, Suite 650 Radnor, PA 19087 Telephone: (310) 474-9111 Facsimile: (310) 474-8585 E-mail: aferich@ahdootwolfson.com - and - William B. Federman, Esq. FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 10205 N. Pennsylvania Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Telephone: (405) 235-1560 E-mail: wbf@federmanlaw.com WHALECO INC: Pottish Suit Removed from State Ct. to C.D. Cal. ------------------------------------------------------------- The class action lawsuit captioned as DALLAS POTTISH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. WHALECO INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a TEMU.COM, Case No. 26STCV13488 (Filed April 27, 2026) was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles to the United States District Court for the Central District of California on May 26, 2026. The Central District of California assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-05657 to the proceeding. The complaint purports to bring this action on behalf of Plaintiff and a putative class of all persons similarly situated. The complaint alleges that Temu sends illegal spam emails to California consumers and installs illegal tracking technologies on website users' devices to conduct digital surveillance. The Complaint brings three causes of action for violations of (1) Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code; (2) the California Trap and Trace Law, and (3) the right against intrusion upon seclusion. The Defendant is represented by: Alexander C.K. Wyman, Esq. LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 485-1234 Facsimile: (213) 891-8763 E-mail: alex.wyman@lw.com - and - Serrin Turner, Esq. Matthew P. Valenti, Esq. TURNER LAW 1271 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 906-1200 Facsimile: (212) 751-4864 E-mail: serrin.turner@lw.com matthew.valenti@lw.com WILDE BRANDS: Walker Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind ------------------------------------------------------------- LEAH WALKER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WILDE BRANDS INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-05448 (N.D. Ill., May 12, 2026) alleges violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant's Web site, https://www.wildebrands.com/ is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, including the Plaintiff, in violation of the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Web site will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. Wilde Brands Inc. is a manufacturer and producer of meat-based protein snack bars and chips. Its protein bar and chips are slow-roasted and made with hand-cut premium lean meats and super-foods. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 4903 Avenue N. Brooklyn, NY 11234 Telephone: (844) 731-3343 Direct: (929) 442-2154 Email: Achan@ealg.law ********* S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA. Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L. Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors. Copyright 2026. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272. This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the publishers. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed. The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000. *** End of Transmission ***