260410.mbx

260410.mbx C L A S S A C T I O N R E P O R T E R Friday, April 10, 2026, Vol. 28, No. 72 Headlines 360TRAINING.COM INC: Alcazar Files Suit in W.D. Texas 3M COMPANY: Hargraves Sues Over Exposure to Toxic Chemicals ALANI NUTRITION: Bahena Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ALANI NUTRITION: Knowles Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS: Parks Suit Transferred to E.D. Virginia APPLICANT INSIGHT: Allen Suit Removed to M.D. Florida ASE TECHNOLOGY: China Supreme Court Reverses Judgment ASTRAL BRANDS INC: Bahena Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website BANANA KELLY: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, Vega Says BASSETT HEALTHCARE NETWORK: Banos Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. BELLI WELLI INC: Taylor Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. BIANCO LANDSCAPE: Hernandez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct BLAKE BROS.: Davis Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website C.D.L. ELECTRIC: Wingfield Sues Over Denied Overtime Compensation CALIFORNIA INVESTOR GROUP: Taylor Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. CAMPERS INN RV: McClure Suit Removed to D. New Jersey CARDINAL GLASS: Garrity Suit Removed to W.D. Washington CAREERIST INC: Buriek Files Suit in S.D. California CENCORA INC: Baldwin FLSA Suit Transferred to E.D. Tennessee CERNER CORPORATION: Fails to Protect Sensitive Data, Bales Says CLIPPER CORPORATION: Bennett Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website CNN LAUNDROMAT: Hernandez Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY: Sued Over Failure to Secure Information CONAGRA BRANDS: Chinchilla Suit Removed to E.D. California CONSUMER SAFETY: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Strahl Alleges CREWFORCE LLC: Taylor Sues Over Unpaid Minimum and Overtime Wages DANUBENET INC: Uribe Files Suit in D. New Jersey DEL-TRIO LIMITED: Bernacchi Sues Over Falsely Labeled Product FEDERAL EXPRESS: Cycle Limited Suit Transferred to W.D. Tennessee FLEXISPOT INC: Lauchung-Nacarino Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. FORWARD AIR SERVICES: Vielma Suit Removed to S.D. California G.I.C. CORPORATION: Casarez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. GL MEZZETTA: Website Inaccessible to Blind Users, Knowles Alleges HAPPY CORNER: Trippett Sues Over Inaccessible Website INFINITE CAMPUS: Clark Files Suit in D. Minnesota JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER: Capellan Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri KADIANT LLC: Shellhorn Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. KAPLAN NORTH AMERICA: Thompson Files Suit in S.D. Florida KEURIG GREEN MOUNTAIN: Bennett Suit Removed to W.D. Washington KOCH FERTILIZER: Wendelken Farms Sues Over Artificial Fixed Prices KYNDRYL HOLDINGS: Zelden Sues Over Alleged Drop in Share Price LA PICCOLA LIGURIA: Seminario Sues to Recover Unpaid Wages LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL: $3.75M Class Settlement to be Heard on July 28 MACY'S INC: Allen Suit Removed to E.D. California MADEWELL INC: Gupta Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. MARKENS NICOLAS: Alexis Sues to Recover Unpaid Wages MARKET AMERICA: Underpays Company Employees, Baker Alleges MEDPEDS ASSOCIATES OF SARASOTA: Haettich Files Suit in Fla. Cir. Ct MH SUB I LLC: Evans Suit Removed to N.D. California MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY: Masterson Files Suit in D. New Jersey MONSANTO COMPANY: Duncan Suit Transferred to N.D. California MONSANTO COMPANY: Freeman Suit Transferred to N.D. California MONSANTO COMPANY: Harper Suit Transferred to N.D. California MRO CORP: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Soper Alleges NAVIGATE360 LLC: Fails to Safeguard Personal Info, Buckles Says OOFOS INC: Saunders Sues Over Data Privacy Violations RBC USA HOLDCO: Mismanages Retirement Plan, Rico Suit Alleges RELIAS LLC: Kieliszewski Privacy Rights Suit Removed to E.D.N.C. SAFEWAY TAX RELIEF: Davis Files TCPA Suit in C.D. California SAMSIC AIRPORT AMERICA: Brunner Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. SELECTBLINDS LLC: Helms Suit Removed to W.D. Washington SOUTH SLOPE: Fuenmayor Sues Over Failure to Pay Wages SYNGENTA CROP: Herbicide Contains Toxic Chemicals, Suit Says TAVERNA ON THE HUDSON: Toplu Sues Over Unpaid Compensations TEMPUS AI: Barone Sues for Loss of Privacy Over Info Disclosure UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX: Theus Suit Transferred to W.D. Texas WATA INC: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Knight Extended to Oct. 29 WAYFAIR INC: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Wilson Suit Claims WAYNE SALISBURY: Court Denies Inmate's Bid in "Morris" WYNN RESORTS LIMITED: Broaddus Files Suit in D. Nevada WYNN RESORTS: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Stroud Alleges YEE-HAW BREWING: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, Archibald Says [^] 10th Class Action Money & Ethics Conference -- 2026 Sponsors Asbestos Litigation ASBESTOS UPDATE: Allstate Sued by Trustee Over Asbestos Litigation ASBESTOS UPDATE: L'Oreal Faces Product Liability Lawsuit ********* 360TRAINING.COM INC: Alcazar Files Suit in W.D. Texas ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against 360training.com, Inc. The case is styled as Elizabeth Alcazar, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 360training.com, Inc. also known as: Mortgage Educators and Compliance, Case No. 1:26-cv-00727-ADA-SH (W.D. Tex., March 26, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. 360training.com, Inc. also known as Mortgage Educators and Compliance -- https://mortgageeducators.com/ -- offer state-specific mortgage loan originator license courses that satisfy national and state-specific requirements in a single package.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Emil Lippe, Jr., Esq. LAW OFFICES OF LIPPE & ASSOCIATES 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Ste. 1250 Dallas, TX 75219 Phone: (214) 855-1850 Fax: (214) 720-6074 Email: emil@texaslaw.com 3M COMPANY: Hargraves Sues Over Exposure to Toxic Chemicals ----------------------------------------------------------- Boyd Hargraves, on behalf of the Estate and NOK of Gideon Hargraves, and other similarly situated v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company); AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS INC.; AMEREX CORPORATION; ARCHROMA U.S. INC.; ARKEMA, INC.; BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPANY; CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION; CHEMDESIGN PRODUCTS, INC.; CHEMGUARD, INC.; CHEMICALS, INC.; CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC; CHUBB FIRE, LTD; CLARIANT CORP.; CORTEVA, INC.; DEEPWATER CHEMICALS, INC.; DU PONT DE NEMOURS INC. (f/k/a DOWDUPONT INC.); DYNAX CORPORATION; E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY; KIDDE PLC; NATION FORD CHEMICAL COMPANY; NATIONAL FOAM, INC.; THE CHEMOURS COMPANY; TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP, as successor-in-interest to The Ansul Company; UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; UTC FIRE & SECURITY AMERICAS CORPORATION, INC. (f/k/a GE Interlogix, Inc.), Case No. 2:26-cv-01354-RMG (D.S.C., March 31, 2026), is brought for damages for personal injury resulting from exposure to aqueous film-forming foams ("AFFF") containing the toxic chemicals collectively known as per and polyfluoroalkyl substances ("PFAS"). PFAS includes, but is not limited to, perfluorooctanoic acid ("PFOA") and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid ("PFOS") and related chemicals including those that degrade to PFOA and/or PFOS. AFFF is a specialized substance designed to extinguish petroleum-based fires. It has been used for decades by military and civilian firefighters to extinguish fires in training and in response to Class B fires. The Defendants collectively designed, marketed, developed, manufactured, distributed, released, trained users, produced instructional materials, promoted, sold, and/or otherwise released into the stream of commerce AFFF with knowledge that it contained highly toxic and bio persistent PFASs, which would expose end users of the product to the risks associated with PFAS. Further, defendants designed, marketed, developed, manufactured, distributed, released, trained users, produced instructional materials, promoted, sold and/or otherwise handled and/or used underlying chemicals and/or products added to AFFF which contained PFAS for use in firefighting. The Defendants manufactured AFFF and/or PFAS for use in AFFF that contaminated and continues to contaminate the environment, yet no Defendant included user warnings to protect the environment or innocent bystanders. PFAS binds to proteins in the blood of humans exposed to the material and remains and persists over long periods of time. Due to their unique chemical structure, PFAS accumulates in the blood and body of exposed individuals. PFAS are highly toxic and carcinogenic chemicals. Defendants knew, or should have known, that PFAS remain in the human body while presenting significant health risks to humans. The Defendants' PFAS-containing AFFF products were used by the Plaintiff in their intended manner, without significant change in the products' condition. Plaintiff was unaware of the dangerous properties of the Defendants' AFFF products and relied on the Defendants' instructions as to the proper handling of the products. Plaintiff's consumption, inhalation and/or dermal absorption of PFAS from Defendant's AFFF products caused Plaintiff to develop the serious medical conditions and complications alleged herein. Plaintiffs had no way to know that they were being exposed to toxic chemicals until the contamination was recently discovered. Through this action, Plaintiff seeks to recover compensatory and punitive damages arising out of the permanent and significant damages sustained as a direct result of exposure to Defendants' AFFF products at various locations during the course of Plaintiff's training and firefighting activities. Plaintiff further seeks injunctive, equitable, and declaratory relief arising from the same, says the complaint. The Plaintiff Boyd Hargraves is the father of Gideon Hargaves who was directly exposed to AFFF through firefighting and/or the Plaintiff's water supply was contaminated with PFOS and PFOA as an after effect of such use and was diagnosed with testicular cancer as a result of exposure to Defendants' AFFF product. The Defendants are designers, marketers, developers, manufacturers, distributors, releasers, instructors, promotors and sellers of PFAS containing AFFF products or underlying PFAS containing chemicals used in AFFF production.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Tayjes Shah, Esq. THE MILLER FIRM, LLC 108 Railroad Ave. Orange, VA 22960 Phone: 540-672-4224 Email: tshah@millerfirmllc.com ALANI NUTRITION: Bahena Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ------------------------------------------------------------ Ashley Bahena, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Alani Nutrition LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-03542 (N.D. Ill., March 31, 2026), is brought against Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its Website https://www.alaninu.com (hereinafter "Website" or "the Website") to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Wood and other blind or visually-impaired individuals. The Defendant is denying blind and visually impaired individuals throughout the United States equal access to the goods and services Defendant provides to their non-disabled customers through the Website. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its Website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered, and in conjunction with its physical locations, is a violation of the Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA"). Because Defendant's Website is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures to that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. This complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer. The Defendant provides to the public the Website, which provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including, the ability to purchase a range of health and wellness products, such as energy drinks, pre-workout powders, protein shakes and bars, and other supplements.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP PLLC 4903 Avenue N, Brooklyn, NY 11234 Office: 844-731-3343 Direct: 929-442-2154 Email: Achan@ealg.law ALANI NUTRITION: Knowles Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ------------------------------------------------------------- Carlton Knowles, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated v. ALANI NUTRITION LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-02617 (S.D.N.Y., March 31, 2026), is brought against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its interactive website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered thereby, is a violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Because Defendant's interactive website, www.alaninu.com, including all portions thereof or accessed thereon (collectively, the "Website" or "Defendant's Website"), is not equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. By failing to make its Website available in a manner compatible with computer screen reader programs, Defendant deprives blind and visually-impaired individuals the benefits of its online goods, content, and services--all benefits it affords nondisabled individuals--thereby increasing the sense of isolation and stigma among those persons that Title III was meant to redress, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer. ALANI NUTRITION LLC, operates the Alani Nu online retail store, as well as the Alani Nu interactive Website and advertises, markets, and operates in the State of New York and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, N.Y. 10003-2461 Phone: (212) 228-9795 Fax: (212) 982-6284 Email: michael@gottlieb.legal dana@gottlieb.legal jeffrey@gottlieb.legal ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS: Parks Suit Transferred to E.D. Virginia ----------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Michael Parks, Chad Sutton, Dr. Sukeena Stephens and Freeman Jordan, on their own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated v. Alejandro Mayorkas, Case No. 1:23-cv-03561 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on March 31, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-00145-KAC-JEM to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Jobs Civil Rights for Employment Discrimination. Alejandro Mayorkas is the Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Pamela Keith, Esq. Scott M. Lempert, Esq. CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT JUSTICE, LLC 650 Massachusetts Ave NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20001 Phone: (202) 800-0292 Email: pamkeith@centerforemploymentjustice.com scottlempert@centerforemploymentjustice.com - and - Jeffrey T. Schrameck, Esq. SCHRAMECK LAW, P.L.L.C. 42180 Ford Road, Suite 275 Canton, MI 48187 Phone: (734) 454-5400 Email: jeff@schramecklaw.com The Defendants are represented by: Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Esq. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 2100 Jamieson Ave. Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone: (703) 299-3700 Email: dennis.barghaan@usdoj.gov - and - Dedra Seibel Curteman, Esq. JACKSON LEWIS, P.C. 11790 Sunrise Valley Drive, Ste. 400 Reston, VA 20191 Phone: (703) 483-8333 Email: dedra.curteman@jacksonlewis.com - and - Derrick A. Petit, Esq. DOJ-USAO 601 D Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 Phone: (202) 252-1729 Email: derrick.petit@usdoj.gov APPLICANT INSIGHT: Allen Suit Removed to M.D. Florida ----------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Mayrie Allen, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Applicant Insight, Inc., Case No. 512026CA000773CAAXWS was removed from the Circuit Court of Pasco County, to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida on March 30, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 8:26-cv-00902 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Consumer Credit. Applicant Insight, Inc. doing business as aINSIGHT -- https://ainsight.online/ -- is leading provider for employee background screening and substance abuse testing.[BN] The Plaintiffs appear pro se. The Defendant is represented by: Karimah Munem Lee, Esq. TROUTMAN PEPPER LOCKE LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: (212) 808-2752 Email: karimah.lee@troutman.com ASE TECHNOLOGY: China Supreme Court Reverses Judgment ----------------------------------------------------- ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. disclosed in its annual report on Form 20-F, for the period ending Dec. 31, 2025, dated and delivered to the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2026, that on March 14, 2024, the Supreme Court of the Republic of China reversed an August 18, 2022 judgment and remanded the case to the Intellectual Property and Commercial Court, where it is currently being tried. On July 8, 2021, the Securities and Futures Investors Protection Center (SFIPC) filed an additional class action requesting that Dr. Tien Wu and three other defendants in the related criminal insider trading proceeding be held jointly liable for damages caused by the alleged insider trading activities, that the Intellectual Property and Commercial Court of the Republic of China ruled in favor of SFIPC and awarded a portion of the damages on August 18, 2022, that all defendants in this class action appealed the August 18, 2022 judgment. ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. is a Taiwan-based provider of semiconductor packaging, testing and electronic manufacturing services, serving global semiconductor and electronics companies. The company offers a broad range of advanced packaging, system-in-package, and turnkey solutions across multiple end markets. ASTRAL BRANDS INC: Bahena Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website -------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley Bahena, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Astral Brands, Inc., d/b/a PUR Cosmetics, Case No. 1:26-cv-03544 (N.D. Ill., March 31, 2026), is brought against Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its Website https://www.purcosmetics.com/ (hereinafter "Website" or "the Website") to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Wood and other blind or visually-impaired individuals. The Defendant is denying blind and visually impaired individuals throughout the United States equal access to the goods and services Defendant provides to their non-disabled customers through the Website. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its Website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered, and in conjunction with its physical locations, is a violation of the Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA"). Because Defendant's Website is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures to that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. This complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer. The Defendant provides to the public the Website, which provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including, the ability to purchase a variety of mineral-based makeup products including foundations, concealers, blushes, mascaras, and lip tints, as well as skincare items like moisturizers, primers, cleansers, and eye treatments.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP PLLC 4903 Avenue N, Brooklyn, NY 11234 Office: 844-731-3343 Direct: 929-442-2154 Email: Achan@ealg.law BANANA KELLY: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, Vega Says ------------------------------------------------------ MIGUEL VEGA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. BANANA KELLY COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., BK BRYANT AVENUE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY, INC., 331 EAST 146TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION, DOUGERT MANAGEMENT CORP., HOPE BURGESS, EMILY DOE, and JOHN/JANE DOES 1–10, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-02609 (S.D.N.Y., March 30, 2026) is an action to recover unpaid wages, including unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act; as well as unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime compensation, statutory wage-statement damages, liquidated damages, prejudgment interest, attorneys' fees, costs, and such other relief as the law permits under New York Labor Law. The complaint relates that the Defendants employed Plaintiff and other non-exempt building-service workers, including porters, cleaners, handymen, maintenance workers, and similar employees, at Bronx residential buildings. However, the Corporate Defendants maintained common unlawful pay practices, including paying a flat weekly wage regardless of hours worked, failing to pay lawful overtime compensation for hours worked over 40 in a workweek, failing to pay all hours worked at or above the applicable minimum wage under New York law, maintaining inaccurate time records, and failing to furnish accurate wage statements. The Defendants' failure to furnish the required wage notice therefore delayed Plaintiff's ability to detect and contest Defendants' unlawful pay practices, delayed Plaintiff's recovery of wages owed to him, and caused Plaintiff concrete monetary harm, including being deprived of wages for longer than he otherwise would have been, adds the complaint. The Plaintiff, therefore, seeks statutory damages under NYLL, together with attorneys' fees, costs, and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. Plaintiff MIGUEL VEGA is an adult individual who worked for Defendants in Bronx County, New York. He worked for Defendants from approximately March 13, 2006 through April 4, 2025. Defendant BANANA KELLY COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. owned, operated, managed, controlled, and/or administered residential buildings and building-service operations in the Bronx, New York, including the operations in which Plaintiff worked. Defendant BK BRYANT AVENUE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY, INC. is a New York housing entity that owned, operated, leased, managed, administered, and/or controlled one or more of the buildings where Plaintiff worked, including 1111 Westchester Avenue and 923 Avenue St. Johns, Bronx, New York. Defendant 331 EAST 146TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION is a New York housing entity that owned, operated, leased, managed, administered, and/or controlled one or more of the buildings where Plaintiff worked, including 1111 Hoe Avenue and 931 Avenue St. Johns, Bronx, New York. Defendant DOUGERT MANAGEMENT CORP. is a New York business entity that acted as a management company, managing agent, billing agent, and/or operating agent for one or more of the buildings where Plaintiff worked and participated in the administration, maintenance, supervision, staffing, payroll, timekeeping, and/or labor operations for those properties. Defendant HOPE BURGESS is an owner, officer, director, principal, and/or managing agent of Banana Kelly and/or one or more related housing entities who exercised operational, policy, and/or compensation control, directly or indirectly, over Defendants' building-service operations. Defendant EMILY DOE is an individual whose full name is presently unknown, who worked in management, ran and supervised the superintendents, supervised Plaintiff's work, and terminated Plaintiff on April 4, 2025. Defendants JOHN/JANE DOES 1–10 are additional owners, officers, supervisors, managers, agents, and/or entities who exercised control over Plaintiff's employment and whose identities are not yet fully known.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Clifford Tucker, Esq. SACCO & FILLAS LLP 31-19 Newtown Ave., 7th Floor Astoria, NY 11102 Telephone: 718-269-2243 E-mail: CTucker@SaccoFillas.com BASSETT HEALTHCARE NETWORK: Banos Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Bassett Healthcare Network. The case is styled as Jose Moza Banos, on behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly-situated v. Bassett Healthcare Network, Case No. Index not Assigned: Pre-RJI (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Monroe Cty., March 31, 2026). The nature of suit stated as Other Commercial (Class & Collective Action). Bassett Healthcare Network -- https://www.bassett.org/ -- provides the full spectrum of health care.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Thomas J. Higgs, Esq. HACKER MURPHY, LLP 28 2nd St. Troy, NY 12180 Phone: 518-274-5820 Email: thiggs@hackermurphy.com BELLI WELLI INC: Taylor Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Belli Welli Inc., et al. The case is styled as Kimberly Taylor, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Belli Welli Inc., Does 1-20, Case No. 26CV007875 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., March 30, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Commercial/Business Tort (Not Fraud/ Breach of Contract)." Belli Welli, Inc. -- https://belliwelli.com/ -- offers packaged food products. The Company provides plant-based snack bars.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Valter Malkhasyan, Esq. MALK & POGO LAW GROUP, LLP 5320 Laurel Canyon Blvd. Valley Village, CA 91607 Phone: 818-351-6611 Email: valter@malkpogolaw.com BIANCO LANDSCAPE: Hernandez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Bianco Landscape Management, et al. The case is styled as Jorge H. Franco Hernandez, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of Aggrieved Employees v. Bianco Landscape Management, John L. Bianco, III, Does 1-50, Case No. 26CV007673 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., March 26, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." Bianco Landscape Management -- https://www.biancolandscape.com/ -- is a horticultural services organization with over 30 years of experience, specializing in commercial landscaping.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Justin Lo, Esq. WORK LAWYERS PC 22939 Hawthorne Blvd., Unit 300 Torrance, CA 90505-3682 Phone: 310-248-2944 BLAKE BROS.: Davis Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ------------------------------------------------------- Nicole Davis, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Blake Bros. International, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-03575 (N.D. Ill., March 31, 2026), is brought against Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its Website https://blakebros.com/ (hereinafter "Website" or "the Website") to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Wood and other blind or visually-impaired individuals. The Defendant is denying blind and visually impaired individuals throughout the United States equal access to the goods and services Defendant provides to their non-disabled customers through the Website. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its Website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered, and in conjunction with its physical locations, is a violation of the Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA"). Because Defendant's Website is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures to that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. This complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer. The Defendant provides to the public the Website, which provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including, the ability to purchase a variety of sterling silver jewelry, including rings, earrings, necklaces, chains, pendants, and bracelets.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP PLLC 4903 Avenue N, Brooklyn, NY 11234 Office: 844-731-3343 Direct: 929-442-2154 Email: Achan@ealg.law C.D.L. ELECTRIC: Wingfield Sues Over Denied Overtime Compensation ----------------------------------------------------------------- Barry Wingfield, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. C.D.L. ELECTRIC COMPANY, LLC, C.D.L. ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., AND C.D.L. ELECTRIC AND SIGNALS, INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-02165 (D. Kan., March 26, 2026), is brought on behalf of all others similarly situated who worked for the Defendants as hourly-paid, non-exempt rail workers and who were unlawfully denied overtime compensation and wages for all hours worked in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), the Kansas Wage Payment Act ("KWPA"), Oklahoma Protection of Labor Act ("OPLA"), New Mexico Minimum Wage Act ("NMMWA"), and Missouri Minimum Wage Law ("MMWL"). The Defendants employ and assign these employees to perform railroad safety and compliance work in the field and direct, control, and supervise the manner in which they perform their work. Despite exercising this control, Defendants maintained compensation practices that resulted in employees performing unpaid work and working hours exceeding 40 per week without receiving overtime compensation at the required rate. The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and other similarly situated rail workers who were employed by Defendants and who were subject to Defendants' unlawful compensation practices in the last 3 years. Defendants violated the FLSA, by failing to pay Plaintiff and other similarly situated rail workers overtime compensation at one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek, and by failing to pay for all hours worked, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Defendants as an hourly-paid, non-exempt Rail Worker in Charge from July 14, 2025, through on October 13, 2025. The Defendants provide electrical and rail infrastructure services, including rail-related safety and compliance support.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason Chambers, Esq. HOLLIS LAW FIRM 8101 College Blvd., Ste 260 Overland Park, KS 66210 Phone: (913) 385-5400 Fax: (913) 385-5402 Email: Jason@hollislawfirm.com - and - Nicholas Conlon, Esq. Michael Rinderman, Esq. BROWN, LLC 111 Town Square Place, Suite 400 Jersey City, NJ 07310 Phone: (877) 561-0000 Fax: (855) 582-5279 Email: nicholasconlon@jtblawgroup.com michael.rinderman@jtblawgroup.com CALIFORNIA INVESTOR GROUP: Taylor Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against California Investor Group, LLC, et al. The case is styled as Brittanie Taylor, and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals v. California Investor Group, LLC d/b/a European Wax Center, Case No. 26CUB01156 (Cal. Super. Ct., Kern Cty., March 26, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Civil Unlimited." California Investor Group, LLC doing business as European Wax Center -- https://locations.waxcenter.com/ca/ -- offers bikini waxing, Brazilian waxing, eyebrow waxing, facial waxing, body waxing and skin care products.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Elliot J. Siegel, Esq. Melissa R. Rinehart, Esq. KING & SIEGEL, LLP 724 S. Spring Street, Suite 201 Los Angeles, CA 90014 Phone: 213-465-4802 Fax: 213-465-4803 Email: elliot@kingsiegel.com melissa@kingsiegel.com CAMPERS INN RV: McClure Suit Removed to D. New Jersey ----------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Eugene McClure and Anna Mae McClure, individually and as class representative on behalf of others similarly situated v. CAMPERS INN RV OF SEWELL, INC d/b/a DYLAN'S RV CENTER; JEFFERY M. HIRSCH; BENJAMIN HIRSCH; MATT JEPPSEN; JACOB HELMS; and ANDY PANDOLFI, Case No. CUM-L-708-25 was removed from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Cumberland County, to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on March 30, 2026, and assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-03379. The First Amended Complaint purports to allege numerous common questions of law and fact, including whether the unitemized documentary fee, title fee overcharge, excess sales price, and pre delivery fee charges constituted violations of the ASP Regulations, MVAP Regulations, CFA, and TCCWNA.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Nicholas A. Duston, Esq. NORRIS McLAUGHLIN, P.A. 400 Crossing Boulevard, 8th Floor Bridgewater, NJ 08807 General: 908-722-0700 Direct: 908-252-4208 Email: naduston@norris-law.com CARDINAL GLASS: Garrity Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Amanda Garrity, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CARDINAL GLASS INDUSTRIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, Case No. 26-2-00242-21 was removed from t the Superior Court of Washington for Lewis County, to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on March 30, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-05309. The Complaint purports to seek relief from Defendant related to Washington law, specifically under Washington Administrative Code ("WAC"), Washington Labor Regulations, and the Revised Code of Washington ("RCW"). The Complaint alleges: failure to provide rest breaks; failure to provide meal breaks; failure to pay all overtime wages; failure to pay all wages due; failure to accrue and allow use of paid sick leave; unlawful deductions and rebates; failure to pay all wages due at termination; and willful refusal to pay wages. The Complaint seeks damages for alleged RCW and WAC violations and attorney fees.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Darren A. Feider, Esq. Tina M. Aiken, Esq. 15375 SE 30th Place, Suite 310 Bellevue, Washington 98007 Phone: (425) 454-4233 Email: dfeider@sbj.law taiken@sbj.law CAREERIST INC: Buriek Files Suit in S.D. California --------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Careerist Inc. The case is styled as Steven Buriek, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. Careerist Inc., Case No. 3:26-cv-01931-AJB-AHG (S.D. Cal., March 26, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Consumer Credit for Unsolicited Telephone Sales. Careerist -- https://www.careerist.com/ -- is an ed-fintech platform that trains job seekers for tech careers (in QA, Sales, Support & more), finances them and automates their job hunting.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gerald D. Lane, Jr., Esq. THE LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI 1515 NE 26TH Street Wilton Manors, FL 33305 Phone: (754) 444-7539 Email: gerald@jibraellaw.com CENCORA INC: Baldwin FLSA Suit Transferred to E.D. Tennessee ------------------------------------------------------------ The case styled as Daniel Baldwin, Jeffry Irwin, Jenny Irwin, Tim Thomas, and Greg Watt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Cencora, Inc., and Hackbarth Delivery Service, Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-02610 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee on March 30, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-00145-KAC-JEM to the proceeding. The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Cencora, Inc. -- https://www.cencora.com/ -- is an American drug wholesale and distribution company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Olena Savytska, Esq. Harold Lichten, Esq. LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 729 Boylston St., Suite 2000 Boston, MA 02116 Phone: (617) 994-5800 Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 Email: osavytska@llrlaw.com hlichten@llrlaw.com - and - Sarah Schalman-Bergen, Esq. LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 729 Boylston St., Suite 2000 Boston, MA 02116 Email: ssb@llrlaw.com The Defendants are represented by: Adam Steel, Esq. SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY 10 West Market Street, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: (317) 492-9267 - and - Charles Andrewscavage, Esq. SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, P.C. 30 W. Monroe St., Ste. 1600 Chicago, IL 60647 Phone: (312) 255-7167 - and - Emily A. Quillen, Esq. SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, P.C. 777 Main Street, Ste. 3450 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone: (817) 869-1700 - and - Stephanie Gantman Kaplan, Esq. BLANK ROME LLP One Logan Square 130 North 18th Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Phone: (215) 569-5381 Fax: (215) 832-5381 CERNER CORPORATION: Fails to Protect Sensitive Data, Bales Says --------------------------------------------------------------- ROBERT BALES, individually, and HAROLD PARK, on behalf of his minor children, E.P., S.P., C.P., and W.P., and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. CERNER CORPORATION D/B/A ORACLE HEALTH, and CHRISTUS HEALTH, Defendants, Case No. 4:26-cv-00268-RK (W.D. Mo., March 30, 2026) arises from Defendants' failure to protect highly sensitive data. The complaint relates that the Defendants store a litany of highly sensitive personally identifiable information ("PII") and protected health information ("PHI") about their current and former patients. Christus contracted with Defendant Oracle Health -- a known Kansas City, MO entity -- to manage its patients' electronic health records ("EHR"). But the Defendants lost control over that data when cybercriminals infiltrated their insufficiently protected computer systems in the Data Breach. Oracle Health notified Christus on December 9, 2025, of a list of patients whose information may have compromised, which included Plaintiffs' Private Information. The types of Private Information exposed included "name, Social Security number, and information included within laboratory records, such as laboratory orders, blood bank records, medical record numbers, doctors, diagnoses, medicine, and test results." And yet, Defendants waited until February 6, 2026, before it began notifying the class -- more than a year after the Data Breach -- thereby depriving the Class of the opportunity to try and mitigate their injuries in a timely manner, asserts the complaint. Indeed, Plaintiff's Private Information has already been misused as a result of the Data Breach. Since the breach, Plaintiff has experienced a significant increase in spam texts, phone calls, and other unsolicited communications that reference or rely on his Private Information, says the suit. Plaintiff Robert Bales received care from Christus before the Data Breach. Plaintiff Harold Park's minor children (E.P., S.P., C.P., & W.P.) received care from Christus before the Data Breach. He brings this action on behalf of his minor children, E.P., S.P., C.P., and W.P. Plaintiffs E.P., S.P., C.P., and W.P. are minors and citizens of Texas. Defendant Cerner Corporation d/b/a Oracle Health is an electronic medical record vendor with its principal place of business in Kansas City, Missouri. It contracted with Christus Health as its laboratory information software vendor. Defendant Christus Health is a healthcare system based in Texas.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Norman E. Siegel, Esq. Barrett J. Vahle, Esq. STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP 460 Nichols Road, Suite 200 Kansas City, MO 64113 Telephone: (816) 714-7112 E-mail: siegel@stuevesiegel.com vahle@stuevesiegel.com - and - Lynn A. Toops, Esq. COHENMALAD, LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Telephone: (317) 636-6481 E-mail: ltoops@cohenmalad.com - and - Thomas E. Loeser, Esq. COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY LLP 1809 7th Ave., Ste. 1610 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 802-1272 E-mail: tloeser@cpmlegal.com - and - Tyler W. Hudson, Esq. WAGSTAFF & CARTMELL, LLP 4740 Grand Ave., Suite #300 Kansas City, MO 64112 Telephone: (816) 701-1100 E-mail: thudson@wcllp.com CLIPPER CORPORATION: Bennett Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ----------------------------------------------------------------- Livingston Bennett, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Clipper Corporation, Case No. 1:26-cv-03548 (N.D. Ill., March 31, 2026), is brought against Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its Website https://www.vikingculinaryproducts.com (hereinafter "Website" or "the Website") to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Wood and other blind or visually-impaired individuals. The Defendant is denying blind and visually impaired individuals throughout the United States equal access to the goods and services Defendant provides to their non-disabled customers through the Website. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its Website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered, and in conjunction with its physical locations, is a violation of the Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA"). Because Defendant's Website is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures to that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. This complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer. The Defendant provides to the public the Website, which provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including, the ability to purchase a selection of premium kitchenware and cooking essentials, including cookware, cookware sets, bakeware, cutlery, kitchen tools and utensils, cutting boards, mixing bowls, and stovetop kettles.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP PLLC 4903 Avenue N, Brooklyn, NY 11234 Office: 844-731-3343 Direct: 929-442-2154 Email: Achan@ealg.law CNN LAUNDROMAT: Hernandez Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages --------------------------------------------------------------- Maria Olga Hernandez, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated employees v. CNN LAUNDROMAT CORP. d/b/a BK LAUNDRY, and AWILDA DE JESUS, individually, Case No. 1:26-cv-01914 (E.D.N.Y., March 31, 2026), is brought under New York State Labor Law to recover unpaid overtime wage compensation and other damages for Plaintiff. The Defendants were required, under relevant New York State law to compensate Plaintiff with overtime pay at one and one-half the regular rate for work in excess of 40 hours per workweek. However, despite such mandatory pay obligations under the NYLL, the Defendants willfully and knowingly compensated Plaintiff at her straight-time hourly rate for all hours worked, including those in excess of 40 hours per week, and failed to pay Plaintiff her lawful overtime premium for the approximately 10 overtime hours she worked each week, says the complaint. The Plaintiff a former employee of Defendant. CNN LAUNDROMAT CORP. d/b/a BK LAUNDRY, a New York Corporation operating a commercial laundry business located in Brooklyn, New York.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Lina Stillman, Esq. STILLMAN LEGAL, P.C. 42 Broadway, 12t Floor New York, NY 10004 Phone: (212) 203-2417 Web: www.StillmanLegalPC.com COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY: Sued Over Failure to Secure Information ------------------------------------------------------------- Felicia Billingslea, Michael Conrad, Charein Faraj, Michelle Ley, and Stacey Marchand, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, TRIZETTO PROVIDER SOLUTIONS, LLC, Case No. 2:26-cv-03394 (D.N.J., March 31, 2026), is brought on behalf all others similarly situated in the alleged Class to seek relief from the consequences of Defendants' failure to secure her Private Information. In order to perform this role, Cognizant and TriZetto handle vast amounts of confidential and sensitive information. This includes both "personally identifying information" ("PII") such as name, birthday, and billing information, as well as "protected health information" ("PHI", together with PII, "Private Information") such as health histories, provider information, and health insurance information. Defendants are trusted by their provider clients and the patients to handle this information with due care and preserve its security. Unfortunately, Defendants did not properly guard this Private Information. On October 2, 2025, TriZetto discovered suspicious activity in its system (the "Breach"). The Breach occurred because Defendants did not take adequate measures to protect the Private Information they were trusted with and allowed the unauthorized access to continue undetected for roughly one year. The Plaintiffs and the Class of other affected patients have been harmed by this disclosure. First and foremost, few things are more sensitive and personal than information about one's health, and courts recognize the special regard for personal health information under the law, says the complaint. The Plaintiffs received notices from the Defendant. Cognizant owns and operates several companies that provide software solutions to stakeholders in the health care industry, such as health care providers, health insurers, and others..[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Adam T. Savett, Esq. Matthew Insley-Pruitt, Esq. Justyn J. Millamena, Esq. WOLF POPPER LLP 570 Lexington Ave., 19th Floor New York, NY 10023 Phone: (212) 759-4600 Email: ASavett@wolfpopper.com MInsley-Pruitt@wolfpopper.com JMillamena@wolfpopper.com CONAGRA BRANDS: Chinchilla Suit Removed to E.D. California ---------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Adam Chinchilla, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. CONAGRA BRANDS, INC; CONAGRA FOODS PACKAGED FOODS, LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,, Case No. CV-26-001482 was removed from the Superior Court of California, County of Stanislaus, to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on March 30, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-01218-JDP. In the Complaint, Plaintiff asserts the following eight causes of action: Failure to Pay Wages for all Hours Worked at Minimum Wage in Violation of Labor Code sections 1194 and 1197; Failure to Pay Overtime Wages for Daily Overtime Worked in Violation of Labor Code sections 510 and 1194; Failure to Authorize or Permit Meal Periods in Violation of Labor Code Section 512 and 226.7; Failure to Authorize or Permit Rest Periods in Violation of Labor Code Section 226.7; Failure to Indemnify Employees for Employment Related Losses/ Expenditures in Violation of Labor Code Section 2802; Failure to Provide Complete and Accurate Wage Statements in Violation of Labor Code Section 226; Failure to Timely Pay all Earned Wages and Final Paychecks Due at the Time of Separation of Employment in Violation of Labor Code Sections 201, 202 and 203; and Unfair Business Practices, in Violation of Business and Professions Code Sections 17200.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Nicky Jatana, Esq. Shannon Bettis Nakabayashi, Esq. Maia Mdinaradze, Esq. Catherine Oh, Esq. JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 50 California Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 394-9400 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 Email: Shannon.Nakabayashi@jacksonlewis.com Maia.Mdinaradze@jacksonlewis.com Catherine.Oh@jacksonlewis.com CONSUMER SAFETY: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Strahl Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------- OLIVER JAMES STRAHL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CONSUMER SAFETY TECHNOLOGY, LLC d/b/a INTOXALOCK, Defendant, Case No. 4:26-cv-00130-SMR-HCA (S.D. Iowa, March 24, 2026) is an action arising from the Defendant's failure to properly secure its IT Network and failure to implement reasonable cybersecurity measures, such as encryption, multi-factor authentication, or timely software patches, which allowed unauthorized third parties to cause service disruptions to Plaintiff and Class Members. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, the Defendant owed Plaintiff and Class Members a duty to take all reasonable and necessary measures to keep its IT Network safe and secure from unauthorized access. Defendant solicited, collected, used, and derived a benefit from having Plaintiff and Class Members as customers, yet breached its duty by failing to implement or maintain adequate security practices. As a result of the Defendant's inadequate digital security procedures, the Plaintiff's and Class Members' have suffered and will continue to suffer injuries including: loss of property, use of their vehicles, and lost wages. Consumer Safety Technology, LLC, doing business as Intoxalock, manufactures interlock devices. The Company designs, develops, and markets alcohol monitoring devices for homes, businesses, and vehicles. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: J. Barton Goplerud, Esq. Brian O. Marty, Esq. SHINDLER ANDERSON GOPLERUD & WEESE P.C. 5015 Grand Ridge Drive, Suite 100 West Des Moines, IO 50265-5749 Telephone: (515) 223-4567 Facsimile: (515) 223-8887 Email: goplerud@sagwlaw.com marty@sagwlaw.com - and - Linda P. Nussbaum, Esq. NUSSBAUM LAW GROUP, P.C. 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 325 Garden City, NY 11530 Telephone: (917) 438-9189 Email: Lnussbaum@nussbaumpc.com - and - Brent S. Schafer, Esq. SCHAFER LAW FIRM, P.A. 8646 Eagle Creek Circle, Suite 212 Savage, MN 55378 Telephone: (651) 209-1919 Email: bschafer@schaferlawfirm.com CREWFORCE LLC: Taylor Sues Over Unpaid Minimum and Overtime Wages ----------------------------------------------------------------- Andre Taylor and Shamar Givens, and all others similarly situated v. CREWFORCE, LLC, SOLAR LANDSCAPE, LLC, Case No. 2:26-cv-03229 (D.N.J., March 26, 2026), is brought for failure to comply with the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), the New Jersey State Wage and Hour Law ("NJSWHL"), the New Jersey Contentious Employe Protection Act ("CEPA"), and the New Jersey Temporary Workers Bill of Rights. The Defendants repeatedly and systemically violated the aforementioned statutes by terminating Plaintiffs' employment because their protected concerns about safety conditions in the workplace, automatically deducting meal break time from employees' hours and pay, and failing to pay employees equal to other employees performing substantially similar work on the same jobsite. Despite the fact that the time for meal breaks was unrecorded, Crewforce automatically deducted for meal breaks for each shift that Plaintiffs worked. The Plaintiffs often did not receive their full uninterrupted meal break, since they were routinely required to perform tasks such as manually stacking pallets, emptying trash bind, or picking up cigarette butts outside during their break times, says the complaint. The Plaintiffs were engaged by Crewforce to work on a jobsite managed by Solar Landscape. Crewforce is a limited liability company organized under the laws of California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ben H. Bodzy, Esq. BODZY LAW PLLC 200 Connell Drive Berkely Heights, NJ 07922 Phone: (888) 215-6060 Email: bbodzy@bodzylaw.com DANUBENET INC: Uribe Files Suit in D. New Jersey ------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Danubenet, Inc. The case is styled as Leila Uribe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Danubenet, Inc. doing business as: Driving School Solutions, Automobile Club of Southern California, Case No. 3:26-cv-03387 (D.N.J., March 30, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. DanubeNet -- https://www.danubenet.com/ -- provides web based applications to small bussnises.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gerald D. Wells, III, Esq. LYNCH CARPENTER, LLP 1760 Market Street, Suite 600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Phone: (267) 344-0991 Fax: (267) 609-6955 Email: jerry@lcllp.com DEL-TRIO LIMITED: Bernacchi Sues Over Falsely Labeled Product ------------------------------------------------------------- Fred Bernacchi, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. DEL-TRIO LIMITED and CAPUTO'S NEW FARM PRODUCE, INC. d/b/a ANGELO CAPUTO'S FRESH MARKETS, Case No. 1:26-cv-03602 (N.D. Ill., March 31, 2026), is brought on behalf of individuals who purchased the falsely and deceptively labeled Product during the statute of limitations period, for violation of Illinois' Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, breach of express warranty, and fraud. This is a class action on behalf of purchasers of Grigoris Lefas "Extra Virgin Olive Oil" (the "Product") in the United States. The Defendants market, label, advertise, and sell the Product to consumers with packaging that prominently and unequivocally represents that the oil is "Extra Virgin Olive Oil" (the "Representation"). Reasonable consumers believe, based on Defendants' Representation, that the Product is olive oil. However, independent laboratory testing has shown that the Product is almost entirely composed of rapeseed oil. Calling a product "olive oil" when it contains any other non-olive oil is barred by an array of olive oil-making conventions, standard industry practices, international regulations, and federal laws. No reasonable consumer would purchase a product labeled as olive oil when it is in fact rapeseed oil. The Defendants' misbranding is intentional. Any reasonable quality control check would detect the presence of rapeseed oil. A packer or distributor of olive oils therefore does not unwittingly mislabel rapeseed oil as olive oil. The mislabeling of the Product renders it completely worthless. By mislabeling the Product, Defendants dupe consumers into purchasing something that is not olive oil. Nevertheless, the Product is labeled and sold as premium olive oil, and it commands a substantial price premium over rapeseed oil, says the complaint. The Plaintiff purchased the Product in September 2025 from a Caputo's store in South Elgin, Illinois. Del-Trio manufactures and distributes the Product throughout the United States and the State of Illinois.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Yitzchak Kopel, Esq. BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. 1330 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor New York, NY 10019 Phone: (646) 837-7150 Fax: (212) 989-9163 Email: ykopel@bursor.com - and - Philip L. Fraietta, Esq. BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. 50 Main Street, Suite 475 White Plains, NY 10606 Phone: (914) 874-0710 Fax: (914) 206-3656 Email: pfraietta@bursor.com FEDERAL EXPRESS: Cycle Limited Suit Transferred to W.D. Tennessee ----------------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Cycle Limited, LLC, and Nicholas R. Metcalf, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, and FEDEX LOGISTICS, INC., Case No. 9:26-cv-80232 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee on March 30, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02345-BCL-atc to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract. FedEx Corporation -- https://www.fedex.com/en-us/home.html -- originally known as Federal Express Corporation, is an American multinational conglomerate holding company specializing in transportation, e-commerce, and business services.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Daniel M. Lader, Esq. Joseph A. DiRuzzo, III, Esq. MARGULIS GELFAND DIRUZZO & LAMBSON 500 East Broward Blvd., Suite 900 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 Phone: 954.615.1676 Fax: 954.827.0340 Email: dan@margulisgelfand.com jd@margulisgelfand.com - and - Justin K. Gelfand, Esq. MARGULIS GELFAND DIRUZZO & LAMBSON, LLC 7700 Bonhomme Avenue, Suite 750 St. Louis (Clayton), Missouri 63105 Phone: 314.390.0230 Fax: 314.485.2264 Email: justin@margulisgelfand.com The Defendants are represented by: Shelby Renee Walton, Esq. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 8285 Tournament Drive Memphis, TN 38125 Phone: (412) 215-2687 Email: shelby.walton@fedex.com FLEXISPOT INC: Lauchung-Nacarino Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. -------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Flexispot, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Elena Lauchung-Nacarino, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals v. Flexispot, Inc., Does 1-10, Case No. CGC26635279 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., March 26, 2026). The case type is stated as "Business Tort." FlexiSpot -- https://www.flexispot.com/ -- specializes in innovative furniture solutions designed to redefine modern work and living spaces.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brent R. Boos, Esq. KING & SIEGEL LLP 724 South Spring Street, Suite 201 Los Angeles, CA 90014 Phone: 213-465-4802 Email: brent@kingsiegel.com FORWARD AIR SERVICES: Vielma Suit Removed to S.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Carmelo Vielma, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. FORWARD AIR SERVICES, LLC, a California limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. 25CU059055C was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on March 26, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-01935-CAB-BLM. The Complaint asserts the following eight causes of action: Failure to Pay Minimum Wages; Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation; Failure to Provide Meal Periods; Failure to Authorize and Permit Rest Breaks; Failure to Indemnify Necessary Business Expenses; Failure to Timely Pay Final Wages at Termination; Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage Statements; and Unfair Business Practices.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Jyoti Mittal, Esq. Jonathan Russell Blakey, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107 Phone: 310.553.0308 Facsimile: 800.715.1330 Email: jmittal@littler.com rblakey@littler.com - and - Alyssa S. Gjedsted, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 633 West 5th Street, 63rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: 213.443.4300 Facsimile: 800.715.1330 Email: agjedsted@littler.com G.I.C. CORPORATION: Casarez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against G.I.C. Corporation, LLC. The case is styled as Jesse Casarez, on behalf of all others similarly situated v. G.I.C. Corporation, LLC, Case No. 26CUB01190 (Cal. Super. Ct., Kern Cty., March 30, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." GIC -- https://www.gic.com.sg/ -- is a global long-term investor established in 1981 to manage Singapore's foreign reserves.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Seung L. Yang, Esq. THE SENTINEL FIRM, APC 355 S. Grand Ave., Suite 1450 Los Angeles, California 90071 Phone: (213) 985-1150 Fax: (213) 985-2155 Email: seung.yang@thesentinelfirm.com GL MEZZETTA: Website Inaccessible to Blind Users, Knowles Alleges ----------------------------------------------------------------- CARLTON KNOWLES, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs v. G. L. MEZZETTA, INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv- 2515 (S.D.N.Y., March 26, 2026) is a civil rights action against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its interactive website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons, in violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. During Plaintiff's visits to the Website, the last occurring on March 16, 2026, in an attempt to purchase a California Habanero Hot Sauce from Defendant and to view the information on the Website, Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers that denied Plaintiff a shopping experience similar to that of a sighted person and full and equal access to the goods and services offered to the public and made available to the public. Due to the inaccessibility of Defendant's Website, blind and visually-impaired consumers such as Plaintiff, who need screen-readers, cannot fully and equally use or enjoy the goods, and services Defendant offers to the public on its Website, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. Plaintiff CARLTON KNOWLE is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer. Defendant G. L. MEZZETTA, INC. operates the Mezzetta online retail store, as well as the Mezzetta interactive Website that provides consumers with access to an array of goods and services including information about Defendant's: pickled vegetables and recipes, as well as other types of goods, pricing, terms of service, refund, privacy policies and internet pricing specials.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Telephone: 212.228.9795 Facsimile: 212.982.6284 E-mail: Jeffrey@Gottlieb.legal Dana@Gottlieb.legal Michael@Gottlieb.legal HAPPY CORNER: Trippett Sues Over Inaccessible Website ----------------------------------------------------- Alfred Trippett, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. HAPPY CORNER HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC D/B/A MOTEK.COM, Case No. 1:26-cv-02483 (S.D.N.Y., March 26, 2026), is brought against the Defendant's failure to provide an accessible website violates the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York Civil Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. The Defendants' website, https://motek.com (the "Website"), contains numerous accessibility barriers that prevent blind users from independently navigating its content, reviewing menu items, placing orders, and making reservations. As a result of these barriers, Plaintiff was denied full and equal access to the goods and services offered through the Website, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is legally blind and relies on screen-reading software to access websites. The Defendant owns and operates the website, which offers consumers the ability to review menu offerings, place online food orders, and make dining reservations at Defendant's restaurant locations.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gabriel Levy, Esq. GABRIEL A. LEVY, P.C. 1129 Northern Blvd., Suite 404 Manhasset, NY 11030 Phone: +1 347-941-4715 Email: glevy@glpcfirm.com INFINITE CAMPUS: Clark Files Suit in D. Minnesota ------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Infinite Campus, Inc. The case is styled as Tiffany Clark, individually and on behalf of herself, and all others similarly situated v. Infinite Campus, Inc., Case No. 0:26-cv-02051 (E.D. Ark., March 26, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. Infinite Campus -- https://www.infinitecampus.com/ -- connects districts to the most modern, innovative, and comprehensive SIS (featuring 1500+ core tools).[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Philip Joseph Krzeski, Esq. Bryan L. Bleichner, Esq. CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1700 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone: (612) 339-7300 Fax: (646) 417-5967 Email: bbleichner@chestnutcambronne.com pkrzeski@chestnutcambronne.com JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER: Capellan Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri ------------------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Diana Capellan, and others similarly situated v. Jupiter Medical Center, Inc., Case No. 9:26-cv-80202 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri on March 26, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 4:26-cv-00257-BP to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Statutory Actions. Jupiter Medical Center -- https://www.jupitermed.com/ -- is the leading destination for world-class health care in Palm Beach County and across the Treasure Coast region.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Cortney Beth Szafran, Esq. 555 12th St #2100 Oakland, CA 94607 Phone: (407) 529-9848 Email: cbs@colevannote.com The Defendant is represented by: Julie Singer Brady, Esq. BAKER & HOSTETLER 200 S Orange Ave Orlando, FL 32801 Phone: (407) 649-4832 Email: jsingerbrady@bakerlaw.com KADIANT LLC: Shellhorn Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kadiant LLC, et al. The case is styled as Cierra Shellhorn, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated v. KADIANT LLC, KADIANT BAY LLC, KADIANT CENTRAL VALLEY LLC, KADIANT SACRAMENTO LLC, KADIANT SO CAL LLC, Does 1-10, Case No. 26CV007881 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., March 30, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case." Kadiant -- https://www.kadiant.com/ -- provides high-quality applied behavior analysis therapy and services to individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Orlando Jose Villalba, Esq. CAPSTONE LAW APC 1875 Century Park E., Ste. 1860 Los Angeles, CA 90067-2519 Phone: 310-556-4811 Email: Orlando.Villalba@capstonelawyers.com KAPLAN NORTH AMERICA: Thompson Files Suit in S.D. Florida --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kaplan North America, LLC. The case is styled as Nicole Dela Cruz Thompson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Kaplan North America, LLC, Case No. 0:26-cv-60891-DMM (S.D. Fla., March 30, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Kaplan -- https://kaplan.com/ -- is a global educational services company that helps individuals and institutions advance their goals.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Nicholas A. Colella, Esq. LYNCH CARPENTER LLP 1133 Penn Avenue 5th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Phone: (412) 322-9243 Email: nickc@lcllp.com KEURIG GREEN MOUNTAIN: Bennett Suit Removed to W.D. Washington -------------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Malika Bennett, on her own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., Case No. 26-00002-06995-6 SEA was removed from the King County Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on March 26, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-01036-RAJ the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. -- https://www.keurig.com/ -- operates as a beverage company. The Company produces and sells coffee, hot cocoa, teas, beverages, and other related products.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Samuel J. Strauss, Esq. STRAUSS BORRELLI PLLC 980 N Michigan Ave., Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: (872) 263-1100 Fax: (872) 263-1109 Email: sam@straussborrelli.com The Defendant is represented by: Elianna Spitzer, Esq. Kit W Roth, Esq. Brian D Buckley, Esq. MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP (WA) 1301 Second Ave., Ste. 3000 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 274-6400 Fax: (206) 274-6401 Email: elianna.spitzer@morganlewis.com kit.roth@morganlewis.com brian.buckley@morganlewis.com KOCH FERTILIZER: Wendelken Farms Sues Over Artificial Fixed Prices ------------------------------------------------------------------ Wendelken Farms LC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. KOCH FERTILIZER, LLC; KOCH AGRONOMIC SERVICES, LLC; NUTRIEN LTD.; NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC., THE MOSAIC COMPANY; CANPOTEX LTD.; CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC.; CF INDUSTRIES INC.; CF INDUSTRIES NITROGEN, LLC; YARA INTERNATIONAL ASA; and YARA NORTH AMERICA, INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-02164 (D. Kan., March 26, 2026), is brought arising from Defendants' conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, or artificially preserve prices for nitrogen fertilizers ("Nitrogen Fertilizers") (the producers of which are Yara, Nutrien, CF Industries, and Koch, together the "Nitrogen Defendants"), phosphorus fertilizers ("Phosphorus Fertilizers") (the producers of which are Mosaic and Nutrien, together the "Phosphorus Defendants"), and the potassium ("potash") fertilizers (the producers of which are Mosaic, Nutrien, and Canpotex, together the "Potash Defendants") (all fertilizers collectively the "NPK Fertilizers") from at least January 1, 2021 through the time that Defendants' misconduct and its anticompetitive effects cease (the "Class Period"). The victims of this conspiracy include indirect purchasers of NPK Fertilizers from Defendants. Individual farmers and growers, agricultural cooperatives, retailers, fertilizer mixers, members of farming associations, and farm and planting partnerships or companies are among those who have been harmed by Defendants. To carry out their price-fixing conspiracy, Defendants began conspiring to artificially inflate the price of NPK Fertilizers around as early as January 1, 2021, although the exact date is currently unknown to Plaintiff. The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of all indirect purchasers of NPK Fertilizers in the United States to seek remedies for injuries inflicted by Defendants' conspiracy and misconduct. The claims against Defendants are for violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 ("Sherman Act"), along with breaches of state antitrust laws. Along with damages, Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of unlawfully obtained profits, and full reimbursement of the costs incurred in pursuing this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees. As a direct result of Defendants' conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, or manipulate prices and the supply of NPK Fertilizers, Plaintiff and similarly situated Class members have suffered significant harm, says the complaint. The Plaintiff purchased one or more NPK Fertilizers indirectly from one or more Defendants during the Class Period for its end use. Koch Fertilizer and its affiliates are major global producers and marketers of fertilizers, including ammonia, urea, urea-ammonium nitrate ("UAN"), phosphate, potash, and sulfur-based products producing over 12 million metric tons of fertilizer annually.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Rex A. Sharp, Esq. Isaac L. Diel, Esq. Hammons P. Hepner, Esq. SHARP LAW, LLP 4820 West 75th Street Prairie Village, KS 66208 Phone: 913/901-0505 Fax: 913/261-7564 Email: rsharp@midwest-law.com idiel@midwest-law.com hhepner@midwest-law.com - and - Stuart A. Davidson, Esq. Mark J. Dearman, Esq. Anny Marie Martin, Esq. ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 225 NE Mizner Boulevard, Suite 720 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Phone: 561/750-3000 Fax: 561/750-3364 Email: sdavidson@rgrdlaw.com mdearman@rgrdlaw.com amartin@rgrdlaw.com - and - Alexandra S. Bernay, Esq. Arthur L. Shingler III, Esq. ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: 619/231-1058 Email: xanb@rgrdlaw.com ashingler@rgrdlaw.com - and - Marc A. Wites, Esq. Thomas Rogers, Esq. WITES & ROGERS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4400 North Federal Highway Lighthouse Point, FL 33064 Phone: 561/567-9947 Email: mwites@whiteslaw.com trogers@whiteslaw.com KYNDRYL HOLDINGS: Zelden Sues Over Alleged Drop in Share Price -------------------------------------------------------------- STUART ZELDEN, derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant KYNDRYL HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff v. MARTIN J. SCHROETER; DAVID B. WYSHNER; VINEET KHURANA; STEPHEN A.M. HESTER; DOMINIC J. CARUSO; JOHN D. HARRIS II; SHIRLEY ANN JACKSON; JANINA KUGEL; DENIS MACHUEL; RAHUL N. MERCHANT; JANA SCHREUDER; HOWARD I. UNGERLEIDER; and KYNDRYL HOLDINGS, INC., Nominal Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-02412 (S.D.N.Y., March 24, 2026) is a shareholder derivative action brought by Plaintiff on behalf of Kyndryl against certain of its officers and members of the Company's Board (the "Individual Defendants") for breaches of their fiduciary duties between at least August 1, 2024, and February 9, 2026, inclusive (the "Relevant Period"), and violations of federal securities laws. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by issuing, causing the issuance of, and failing to correct the materially false and misleading statements and omissions of material fact to the investing public. Specifically, the Defendants failed to disclose to investors, inter alia, that: (i) certain of Kyndryl's executive officers manipulated the Company's free cash flow metrics by systematically deferring vendor payments from one quarter to the next; (ii) as a result of the scheme, the Company's reported free cash flow metrics were not an accurate measure of the quality and sustainability of the Company's earnings and revenue growth; (iii) the Company's disclosure practices, accounting practices, and internal controls over financial reporting were materially deficient; (iv) due to the foregoing, the Company's business, financial condition, and prospects of profitable growth were materially worse than represented; and (v) as a result of the foregoing, the Company's public statements regarding its business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. The Company's stock price declined $12.90 per share, or approximately 54%, to close at $10.59 per share on February 9, 2026, says the suit. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. operates as a holding company. The Company, through its subsidiaries, provides applications, data, AI, cloud, core enterprise, digital workplace, security, and other related services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Vincent A. Licata, Esq. Leah B. Wihtelin, Esq. RIGRODSKY LAW, P.A. 225 Broadway, Suite 3707 New York, NY 10007 Telephone: (212) 201-7690 Email: vl@rl-legal.com lw@rl-legal.com - and - Joshua H. Grabar, Eq. GRABAR LAW OFFICE One Liberty Place 1650 Market Street, Suite 3600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (267) 507-6085 Email: jgrabar@grabarlaw.com LA PICCOLA LIGURIA: Seminario Sues to Recover Unpaid Wages ---------------------------------------------------------- Diego Seminario, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. LA PICCOLA LIGURIA, INC., JACK SANTOMAURO, and VICTOR RAIMONDO a/k/a VICTORIO RAYMUNDO, Case No. 1:26-cv-01797 (E.D.N.Y., March 26, 2026), is brought to recover unpaid wages, overtime compensation, unlawfully retained tips, spread-of-hours pay, liquidated damages, statutory damages, prejudgment interest, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), and the New York Labor Law ("NYLL"), including the Hospitality Industry Wage Order. The Defendants paid Plaintiff on a tipped basis but failed to pay him for all hours worked and failed to pay lawful overtime compensation for hours over forty in a workweek. The Defendants also claimed the benefit of a tip credit while, on information and belief, failing to satisfy the conditions for taking a valid tip credit, including by diverting customer tips to kitchen staff and/or other non-tipped employees and failing to provide proper notices. Defendants further failed to pay spread-of-hours compensation for days in which Plaintiff's workday exceeded ten hours from beginning to end. The Defendants issued wage statements that did not accurately reflect all hours worked, all applicable rates, and all wages due. The Defendants' violations were willful, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Defendants as a non-exempt restaurant employee, including as a busboy and food runner. The La Piccola Liguria, Inc. is a New York domestic business corporation doing business in Nassau County, New York.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Clifford Tucker, Esq. SACCO & FILLAS LLP 3119 Newtown Avenue, Seventh Floor Astoria, NY 11102 Phone: 718-269-2243 Fax: 718-679-9660 Email: ctucker@saccofillas.com LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL: $3.75M Class Settlement to be Heard on July 28 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pomerantz LLP and The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announced that the United States District Court District of Minnesota has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. Securities (NASDAQ: LFCR): UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA DAVID CAREW, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC., ALBERT D. BOLLES, JAMES G. HALL, BRIAN MCLAUGHLIN, and JOHN MORBERG, Defendants. No. 0:24-cv-03028-LMP-EMB CLASS ACTION SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, AND AWARDS TO LEAD PLAINTIFFS To: All persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. ("Lifecore" or the "Company") securities between October 7, 2020, and March 19, 2024, both dates inclusive (the "Settlement Class Period"), and were damaged thereby ("Settlement Class"). YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, that Court-appointed Lead Plaintiffs David Carew and Hugh Robert Holmes (collectively, "Lead Plaintiffs") on behalf of themselves and all members of the proposed Settlement Class, and Defendants Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. ("Lifecore"), Albert D. Bolles, James G. Hall, Brian McLaughlin, and John Morberg (collectively, "Defendants"), reached a proposed settlement of the claims in the class action (the "Action") in the amount of $3,750,000 (the "Settlement"). A hearing will be held before the Honorable Laura M. Provinzino, either in person or remotely in the Court's discretion, on July 28, 2026, at 10:30 a.m. CDT in Courtroom 3A of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, Warren E. Burger Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 316 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN 55101 (the "Settlement Hearing") to determine whether the Court should: (i) approve the proposed Settlement as fair, reasonable and adequate; (ii) dismiss the Action with prejudice as provided in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the "Stipulation"),1 dated January 15, 2026; (iii) approve the proposed Plan of Allocation for distribution of the proceeds of the Settlement (the "Net Settlement Fund") to Settlement Class Members; and (iv) approve Co-Lead Counsel's application for attorneys' fees, reimbursement of litigation expenses, and awards to Lead Plaintiffs. The Court may change the date of the Settlement Hearing, or hold it remotely, without providing another notice. You do NOT need to participate at the Settlement Hearing to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A MONETARY PAYMENT. If you have not yet received a Notice and Claim Form, you may obtain copies of these documents by visiting the website for the Settlement, www.strategicclaims.net/Lifecore, or by contacting the Claims Administrator at: Carew v. Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. et al., No. 0:24-cv-03028-LMP-EMB c/o Strategic Claims Services P.O. Box 230 600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 205 Media, PA 19063 (866) 274-4004 info@strategicclaims.net www.strategicclaims.net/Lifecore Inquiries, other than requests for information about the status of a claim, may also be made to Co-Lead Counsel: POMERANTZ LLP Brenda Szydlo, Esq. 600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10016 bszydlo@pomlaw.com (212) 661-1100 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. Phillip Kim, Esq. 275 Madison Avenue 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 philkim@rosenlegal.com (212) 686-1060 If you are a Settlement Class Member, to be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must submit a Claim Form postmarked or submitted online no later than July 7, 2026. If you are a Settlement Class Member and do not timely submit a valid Claim Form, you may not be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, but you will nevertheless be bound by all of the terms of the Stipulation, and all of the terms of the Judgment or orders entered by the Court relating to the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable. If you are a Settlement Class Member and wish to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you must submit a written request for exclusion in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice so that it is received no later than July 7, 2026. If you properly exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you will not be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court relating to the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable, and you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund. Any objections to the proposed Settlement, Co-Lead Counsel's application for attorneys' fees, reimbursement of expenses, and awards to Lead Plaintiffs and/or the proposed Plan of Allocation must be filed with the Court, and be mailed or delivered to counsel for the Parties in accordance with the instructions in the Notice, such that they are received no later than July 7, 2026. PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT, DEFENDANTS, OR DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL REGARDING THIS NOTICE. Dated: March 13, 2026 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MACY'S INC: Allen Suit Removed to E.D. California ------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Cheryl Allen, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. MACY'S, INC., a Delaware Stock Corporation; MACY'S CORPORATE SERVICES, LLC, an Ohio Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Case No. STK-CV-UOE-2026-1465 was removed from the Superior Court of California for the County of San Joaquin, to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on March 31, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-at-00552. The Plaintiff alleges class claims for failure to pay overtime wages, failure to pay minimum wages, failure to provide meal periods, failure to provide rest periods, failure to reimburse reasonable and necessary business expenses, failure to comply with Labor Code Section 204, failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements, and violation of the state Unfair Competition Law.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Michael C. Christman, Esq. MACY'S LAW DEPARTMENT 11477 Olde Cabin Road, Suite 400 St. Louis, MO 63141 Phone: (314) 342-6334 Facsimile: (314) 342-6366 Email: michael.christman@macys.com MADEWELL INC: Gupta Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Madewell, Inc. The case is styled as Poonam Gupta, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals v. Madewell, Inc., Case No. CGC26635252 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., March 26, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Non-Exempt Complaints." Madewell, Inc. -- https://www.madewell.com/ --- offers premium denim and foundational wardrobe pieces for men and women that balance quality, authenticity, and versatility.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Matthew W. Ruan, Esq. FREED KANNER LONDON & MILLEN LLC 100 Tri-State International Suite 128 Lincolnshire, IL 60069 Phone: 224-632-4500 Email: mruan@fklmlaw.com MARKENS NICOLAS: Alexis Sues to Recover Unpaid Wages ---------------------------------------------------- Ernest Alexis, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. MARKENS NICOLAS; US AUTO STORAGE LLC a/k/a PRIME PARK JFK; AIRLOT SYSTEMS LLC d/b/a AIRLOT and/or ECONOPARK; JFK LONG TERM PARKING, INC.; AIR PARK OF JFK INC.; and JOHN/JANE/ABC/XYZ DOES 1-10, Case No. 1:26-cv-01905 (E.D.N.Y., March 31, 2026), is brought to recover unpaid straight-time wages, minimum wages, overtime wages, spread-of-hours pay, late-paid wages, statutory notice and statement damages, unlawful deductions, and retaliation damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), and the New York Labor Law ("NYLL"). The Defendants did not pay Plaintiff at one and one-half times his regular rate for hours worked over forty in a workweek. Instead, when Plaintiff was paid, Defendants seemed to pay straight time for all hours worked to the extent Plaintiff was paid. The Defendants sometimes withheld amounts described as "taxes" from Plaintiff's wages, yet Defendants did not provide Plaintiff with compliant wage statements showing the basis for the deductions, the employer's current legal name and address, the regular and overtime rates, or the number of hours worked at each rate, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was employed by Defendants as a parking attendant from December 22, 2024 through March 30, 2025. The Defendants operated airport-parking businesses in Queens, New York.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Clifford Tucker, Esq. SACCO & FILLAS LLP 3119 Newtown Ave, Seventh Floor, Astoria, NY 11102 Phone: 718-269-2243 Email: CTucker@SaccoFillas.com MARKET AMERICA: Underpays Company Employees, Baker Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------- EVA BAKER, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MARKET AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-22153-XXXX (S.D. Fla, March 30, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to comply with the overtime compensation requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Acts for BAKER and other administrative employees, house services employees, and other misclassified independent contractors similarly situated to her despite the primary job duties performed for Defendant being non-exempt in nature. The complaint relates that the Plaintiff's primary job duties between March 2024 and February 2026 consist of: (a) receiving and logging-in daily mail and deliveries at the estate; (b) downloading receipts for daily purchases made for all properties, processing payments, credit card reconciliations, and assisting MARKET AMERICA, INC.'s corporate finance department located at Defendant's corporate headquarters in Greensboro, North Carolina; (c) office filing, logs, file uploads and participating in TEAMS meetings with Defendant's corporate office; (d) taking daily photos of construction progress at the estate and communicating with the General Contractor, subcontractors, and vendors for the Ridinger construction ongoing at the estate; (e) working with housekeepers, groundskeepers, and property maintenance at the estate; and (f) property security shift-relief at the estate at 8:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and walking the property for shift handover to security at 6:00 p.m. each weekday. During the three year statute of limitations period between March 2024 and February 2026, BAKER regularly worked in excess of 40 hours per week while performing non-exempt clerical duties for Defendant. However, Defendant has failed to pay time and one-half wages for the overtime hours worked by BAKER and the other similarly situated administrative employees, house services employees, and other misclassified independent contractors, however variously titled, for all of their actual overtime hours worked within the three year statute of limitations period between March 2023 and the present, with Defendant instead misclassifying Plaintiff and the other similarly situated employees as independent contractors and paying only straight-time wages for hours worked in excess of 40 hours of work per week without time and one-half compensation for all of the overtime hours worked for Defendant during numerous work weeks between March 2023 and the present. The Defendant has failed to maintain contemporaneous and accurate records of the actual start times, stop times, number of hours worked each day, and total hours actually worked each week by BAKER and other similarly situated administrative employees, house services employees, and other misclassified independent contractors, however variously titled, during each week between March 2023 and the present as required by the FLSA, adds the suit. Accordingly, the Plaintiff and any current or former employees similarly situated to her who join this action as Opt-In Plaintiffs, demand judgment against Defendant, MARKET AMERICA, INC., for the payment of all unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit, and for all proper relief including prejudgment interest. Plaintiff EVA BAKER worked as an Administrative Assistant in the property management office belonging to the private residential estate of MARKET AMERICA, INC.'s CEO-owner, Loren Ridinger, located at 2954 North Bay Road, Miami Beach, Florida 33140. Defendant, MARKET AMERICA, INC. operated as a global e-commerce and product brokerage business with its corporate headquarters located at 1302 Pleasant Ridge Road, Greensboro, North Carolina.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Keith M. Stern, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF KEITH M. STERN, P.A. 80 S.W. 8th Street, Suite 2000 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 901-1379 Facsimile: (561) 288-9031 E-mail: employlaw@keithstern.com MEDPEDS ASSOCIATES OF SARASOTA: Haettich Files Suit in Fla. Cir. Ct ------------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against MedPeds Associates of Sarasota PA. The case is styled as Brian Haettich, on behalf of others similarly situated v. MedPeds Associates of Sarasota PA, Case No. 2026CA001732SC (Fla. Cty. Ct., Sarasota Cty., March 26, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Negligency - Circuit (South County)." MedPeds Associates of Sarasota PA -- http://medpedsdocs.com/-- offers comprehensive medical services in both Internal Medicine and Pediatrics.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Christopher Gold, Esq. GOLD LAW 350 Lincoln Rd., 2nd Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 Phone:(305) 900-4653 Email: info@chrisgoldlaw.com MH SUB I LLC: Evans Suit Removed to N.D. California --------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Scott Evans, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. MH Sub I, LLC, Does 1-100, inclusive, Case No. 26-CIV-01274 was removed from the San Mateo County Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 26, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-02684 the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. MH Sub I, LLC, doing business as Internet Brands -- https://www.internetbrands.com/ -- is a major digital media, marketing, and software company based in El Segundo, California.[BN] The Plaintiff appears pro se. The Defendant is represented by: Paul Andrew Rosenthal, Esq. FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH 600 Campus Drive Florham Park, NJ 07932 Phone: (973) 549-7030 Email: paul.rosenthal@faegredrinker.com MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY: Masterson Files Suit in D. New Jersey ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Monmouth University, Inc. The case is styled as Erin Masterson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Monmouth University, Inc., Case No. 3:26-cv-03233-RK-JBD (D.N.J., March 26, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Monmouth University -- https://www.monmouth.edu/ -- is a private university in West Long Branch, New Jersey.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gerald D. Wells, III, Esq. LYNCH CARPENTER, LLP 1760 Market Street, Suite 600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Phone: (267) 344-0991 Fax: (267) 609-6955 Email: jerry@lcllp.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Duncan Suit Transferred to N.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Warden William Duncan, and others similarly situated v. Monsanto Company, Case No. 4:26-cv-00351 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 26, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-02672-VC to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Personal Inj. Prod. Liability for Personal Injury. The Monsanto Company -- https://www.monsanto.com/ -- was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Tiffany Webber Carpenter, Esq. CORY WATSON, PC 254 Court Avenue, Suite 511 Memphis, TN 38103 Phone: (901) 402-1100 Fax: (866) 327-4000 Email: tcarpenter@corywatson.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Freeman Suit Transferred to N.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Thomas Freeman, Jr., and others similarly situated v. Monsanto Company, Case No. 2:26-cv-00534 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 26, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-02673-VC to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Personal Inj. Prod. Liability for Product Liability. The Monsanto Company -- https://www.monsanto.com/ -- was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: John C. Enochs, Esq. Betsy J. Barnes, Esq. MORRIS BART, P.L.C. 601 Poydras Street, 24th Floor New Orleans, LA 70130 Phone: (504) 526-1087 Fax: (833) 277-4214 Email: jenochs@morrisbart.com bbarnes@morrisbart.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Harper Suit Transferred to N.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Monty Harper, and others similarly situated v. Monsanto Company, Case No. 4:26-cv-00353 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 26, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-02674-VC to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Personal Inj. Prod. Liability for Personal Injury. The Monsanto Company -- https://www.monsanto.com/ -- was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Tiffany Webber Carpenter, Esq. CORY WATSON, PC 254 Court Avenue, Suite 511 Memphis, TN 38103 Phone: (901) 402-1100 Fax: (866) 327-4000 Email: tcarpenter@corywatson.com MRO CORP: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Soper Alleges ----------------------------------------------------- MARK SOPER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MRO CORP.; MEDICOPY SERVICES, INC.; and DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., Defendants, Case No. 2:26-cv-01909 (E.D. Pa., March 24, 2026) is an action arising from the Defendants' failure to properly secure and safeguard Personal Information that was entrusted to it, and their accompanying responsibility to store and transfer that information. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff and the Class entrusted the Defendants with their sensitive personally identifiable information and personal health information but was impacted in a data breach that Defendant publicly disclosed in March 2026. The Defendants failed to properly maintain and safeguard their computer systems and data and failed to audit, monitor, or ensure the integrity of their vendor's data security practices. The Data Breach was a direct result of Defendants' failure to implement adequate and reasonable cybersecurity procedures and protocols necessary to protect Personal Information from the foreseeable threat of a cyberattack, says the suit. MRO Corp. develops a technology software. The Company offers healthcare data management solutions that delivers clinical data information and exchange reporting for providers to streamline processes through network infrastructure services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Andrew W. Ferich, Esq. Brian J. Devall, Esq. AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 201 King of Prussia Road, Suite 650 Radnor, PA 19087 Telephone: (310) 474-9111 Facsimile: (310) 474-8585 Email: aferich@ahdootwolfson.com bdevall@ahdootwolfson.com - and - Benjamin F. Johns, Esq. Samantha E. Holbrook, Esq. SHUB JOHNS & HOLBROOK LLC Four Tower Bridge 200 Barr Harbor Drive, Suite 400 Conshohocken, PA 19428 Telephone: (610) 477-8380 Facsimile: (856) 210-9088 Email: bjohns@shublawyers.com sholbrook@shublawyers.com NAVIGATE360 LLC: Fails to Safeguard Personal Info, Buckles Says --------------------------------------------------------------- CHARLES BUCKLES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. NAVIGATE360, LLC, doing business as P3 GLOBAL INTEL, Defendant, Case No. 5:26-cv-00760 (N.D. Ohio, March 30, 2026) arises from Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard sensitive Personally Identifiable Information ("PII" or "Private Information") that was entrusted to it, and its accompanying responsibility to store and transfer that information. The complaint relates that the Plaintiff and Class Members provided their Private Information to Defendant with the reasonable expectation and on the mutual understanding that Defendant would comply with its obligations to keep such information confidential and secure from unauthorized access. However, the Defendant recently experienced breach involving unauthorized access to sensitive Private Information contained on its network. While Defendant sought to minimize the damage caused by the Data Breach that occurred in March 2026, it cannot and has not denied that there was unauthorized access to the sensitive Private Information of Plaintiff and Class Members. As a result of Defendant's inadequate digital security and notice process, Plaintiff's and Class Members' Private Information was exposed to criminals. Plaintiff and the Class Members have suffered and will continue to suffer injuries including: financial losses caused by misuse of their Private Information; the loss or diminished value of their Private Information as a result of the Data Breach; lost time associated with detecting and preventing identity theft; and theft of personal and financial information, says the suit. The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of all persons whose Private Information as compromised as a result of Defendant's failure to: (i) adequately protect the Private Information of Plaintiff and Class Members; (ii) warn Plaintiff and Class Members of Defendant's inadequate information security practices; (iii) effectively secure hardware containing protected Private Information using reasonable and adequate security procedures free of vulnerabilities and incidents; and (iv) timely notify Plaintiff and Class Members of the Data Breach. Defendant's conduct amounts to at least negligence and violates federal and state statutes, adds the complaint. Accordingly, the Plaintiff brings this action individually and on behalf of a Nationwide Class of similarly situated individuals against Defendant for: negligence, unjust enrichment, and breach of implied contract. Plaintiff seeks to remedy these harms and prevent any future data compromise on behalf of himself, and all similarly situated persons whose personal data was compromised and stolen as a result of the Data Breach and who remain at risk due to Defendant's inadequate data security practices. Plaintiff is a citizen and resident of Saint Gabriel, Louisiana. Defendant Navigate360, LLC d/b/a P3 Global Intel provides safety and wellness programs to schools and communities across the county.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Terence R. Coates, Esq. Dylan J. Gould, Esq. MARKOVITS, STOCK & DEMARCO, LLC 119 East Court Street, Suite 530 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Telephone: (513) 651-3700 Facsimile: (513) 665-0219 E-mail: tcoates@msdlegal.com dgould@msdlegal.com - and - Jeff Ostrow, Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW P.A. One West Las Olas Blvd., Suite. 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 332-4200 E-mail: ostrow@kolawyers.com OOFOS INC: Saunders Sues Over Data Privacy Violations ----------------------------------------------------- KERREY SAUNDERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. OOFOS, INC., Defendant, Case No. 4:26-cv-02537 (N.D. Cal., March 24, 2026) alleges violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the California Invasion of Privacy Act, and the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff and the Class accessed and navigated Defendant's website, www.oofos.com, and their electronic communications were intercepted or recorded by advertising technology provided by Meta Platforms, Inc., Google, LLC, TikTok, Ltd., Klaviyo, Inc., and AppLovin Corp. (collectively the "Third Parties" or "Third Party Tracking Technologies"). Unbeknownst to its customers, and contrary to its express assurances that targeting cookies "do not store personally identifiable information," the Defendant intercepts and discloses its customers personally identifiable information, and product purchase information to the Third Parties. The Defendant aids, agrees with, employs, or otherwise enables Third Parties to eavesdrop on communications sent and received by Plaintiff and Class Members on the Website that Defendant owns and operates, including communications that contain PII, says the suit. Oofos, Inc. retails footwear online. The Company offers sandals, shoes, clogs, boots, slides, and slippers, as well as apparel products for men and women. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Sarah N. Westcot, Esq. BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. 701 Brickell Ave, Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131-2800 Telephone: (305) 330-5512 Facsimile: (305) 676-9006 E-mail: swestcot@bursor.com RBC USA HOLDCO: Mismanages Retirement Plan, Rico Suit Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------- DANIEL RICO, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the RBC U.S.A. RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN, Plaintiff v. RBC USA HOLDCO CORPORATION; THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF RBC USA HOLDCO CORPORATION AND ITS MEMBERS; THE RBC USA PENSIONS AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE AND ITS MEMBERS; DOES 1-20, and DOES 21-40, Defendants, Case No. 0:26-cv-02008-PJS-ECW (D. Minn., March 24, 2026) alleges violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, despite their fiduciary obligation, the Defendants have kept two grossly underperforming funds in the plan—the T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (the "Growth Stock Fund") and the T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (the "Mid Cap Fund"). The Defendants have kept the Growth Stock Fund in the Plan for over 13 years and the Mid Cap Fund for over 17 years. The Defendants' decision not to remove the Growth Stock Fund and the Mid Cap Growth Fund (together the "T. Rowe Price Funds") has adversely impacted the retirement savings of Plan participants by hundreds of millions of dollars, says the suit. RBC USA Holdco Corporation operates as an investment holding company. The Company offers corporate banking, leveraged finance, equity capital markets, and commodity market services, as well as holds and trades fixed income, foreign exchange, and equity securities. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Susan M. Coler, Esq. HALUNEN LAW 1650 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 605-4098 Facsimile: (612) 605-4099 - and - Charles H. Field, Esq. SANFORD HEISLER SHARP MCKNIGHT, LLP 7911 Herschel Avenue, Suite 300 La Jolla, CA, 92037 Telephone: (619) 577-4252 Facsimile: (619) 577-4250 Email: cfield@sanfordheisler.com - and - Leigh Anne St. Charles, Esq. SANFORD HEISLER SHARP MCKNIGHT, LLP 611 Commerce Street, Suite 3100 Nashville, TN 37203 Telephone: (615) 434-7000 Facsimile: (615) 434-7020 Email: lstcharles@sanfordheisler.com - and - Don Bivens, Esq. Maxwell K. Weiss, Esq. DON BIVENS, PLCC 15169 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 205 Scottsdale, AZ 85254 Telephone: (602) 708-1450 Email: don@donbivens.com max@donbivens.com RELIAS LLC: Kieliszewski Privacy Rights Suit Removed to E.D.N.C. ---------------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as ANGIE KIELISZEWSKI, LYNNANN WARE, and SANDRA ROTH individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. RELIAS LLC, Defendant, Case No. 6CV007782-910, was removed from the Superior Court for Wake County, North Carolina to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Western Division on March 26, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 5:26-cv-00193-M to the proceeding. In this purported Class Action Complaint, the Plaintiffs seek recovery related to alleged violations of the federal Video Privacy Protection Act. The Plaintiffs claim that Relias violates the privacy rights granted to them under the VPPA by knowingly disclosing its consumers' personally identifiable information to Meta.[BN] The Defendant is represented by: H. Hunter Bruton, Esq. David A. Senter, Jr., Esq. C. Michael Anderson, Esq. John L. Gibbons, Esq. Noel F. Hudson, Esq. SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, L.L.P. Post Office Box 2611 Raleigh, NC 27602-2611 Telephone: (919) 821-1220 Facsimile: (919) 821-6800 E-mail: hbruton@smithlaw.com dsenter@smithlaw.com manderson@smithlaw.com jgibbons@smithlaw.com nhudson@smithlaw.com SAFEWAY TAX RELIEF: Davis Files TCPA Suit in C.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Safeway Tax Relief, Inc. The case is styled as Taneshae N. Davis, individually, and behalf of all others similarly situated v. Safeway Tax Relief, Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-03250 (C.D. Cal., March 26, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. SafewayTax -- https://www.safewaytax.com/ -- is leading the industry in resolving IRS tax debt.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alexander James Adducci Taylor, Esq. SULAIMAN LAW GROUP LTD - LOMBARD IL 2500 S. Highland Avenue, Suite 200 Lombard, IL 60148 Phone: (630) 575-8181 Fax: (630) 575-8188 Email: ataylor@sulaimanlaw.com SAMSIC AIRPORT AMERICA: Brunner Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against SAMSIC AIRPORT AMERICA, LLC, et al. The case is styled as Anthony Brunner, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. SAMSIC AIRPORT AMERICA, LLC, Does 1-50, Inclusive, Case No. CGC26635247 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., March 26, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Non-Exempt Complaints." Samsic Airport -- https://www.samsic.aero/ -- deploys all the necessary resources to ensure the safety, well-being, and comfort of passengers as they transit through airports.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mehrdad Bokhour, Esq. BOKHOUR LAW GROUP, PC 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 450 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6006 Phone: 310-975-1493 Fax: 310-675-0861 Email: mehrdad@bokhourlaw.com SELECTBLINDS LLC: Helms Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Mary Helms, for herself, as a private attorney general, and/or on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SELECTBLINDS LLC, Case No. 26-2-00016-30 was removed from the Superior Court for Skamania County, to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on March 31, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-05315. The Plaintiff alleges that the putative class consists of "thousands of individuals," and seeks "$500 in statutory damages for each and every email that violated CEMA that was transmitted to them" in addition to "actual damages, treble damages, and attorneys' fees and costs, pursuant to RCW 19.86.090." The Plaintiff further alleges that "SelectBlinds has transmitted hundreds of commercial emails with false or misleading subject lines to Plaintiff and other Washington residents in violation of CEMA."[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Austin Rainwater, Esq. Kristin Asai, Esq. Abigail Gore, Esq. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4700 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: 206.505.4000 Email: Austin.Rainwater@hklaw.com Kristin.Asai@hklaw.com Abigail.Gore@hklaw.com SOUTH SLOPE: Fuenmayor Sues Over Failure to Pay Wages ----------------------------------------------------- Juan Bolivar Fuenmayor, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated v. SOUTH SLOPE AUTO BODY & RESTORATION INC. and MAURO CUESTA, Case No. 1:26-cv-0180 (E.D.N.Y., March 26, 2026), is brought Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and the New York Labor Law ("NYLL") as a result of the Defendants' failure to pay proper wages. Based on that regular schedule, Plaintiff worked approximately 9.25 hours per day and 46.25 hours per week. Plaintiff did not receive overtime pay at one and one-half times his regular rate for hours worked over forty in a workweek. The Plaintiff did not receive at hiring a wage notice stating his rate or rates of pay, the basis of pay, allowances claimed, or regular payday, as required by NYLL. Due to Defendant(s)' failure to provide legally mandated notices such as earning statements and wage notices, Defendant(s) were able to hide their wrongdoing from employees, and continue to attempt to hide their wrongdoing necessitating the current litigation. The failure to provide NYLL notices continues to result in delayed payment of all proper wages owed to Plaintiff(s)and Class members. The Defendants did not maintain accurate records of all hours worked and wages paid to Plaintiff, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was employed by Defendants in Brooklyn, New York as an automobile painter and body-repair worker. South Slope Auto Body & Restoration Inc. is a New York corporation doing business in Brooklyn, New York.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Clifford Tucker, Esq. SACCO & FILLAS LLP 31-19 Newtown Avenue, Seventh Floor Astoria, NY 11102 Phone: (718) 269-2251 SYNGENTA CROP: Herbicide Contains Toxic Chemicals, Suit Says ------------------------------------------------------------ JEFFERY WILLIAMS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC; and CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., Defendants, Case No. N26C-03-452 PQT (Del., Sup., March 24, 2026) is an action for damages suffered by the Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and sale of products containing the herbicide Paraquat, which causes Parkinson's disease in humans. According to the complaint, the Defendants' Paraquat products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC produces fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, and seed care treatments, as well as farm management, seeds, and research and development services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com TAVERNA ON THE HUDSON: Toplu Sues Over Unpaid Compensations ----------------------------------------------------------- Hamza Toplu, Yunus Emre Ozmert, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated v. TAVERNA ON THE HUDSON L.L.C., JOHN DAWLI and HUSSAM SHAHEN, Case No. 2:26-cv-03211 (D.N.J., March 26, 2026), is brought to recover unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), and unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime wages, unpaid and withheld wages, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, costs, interest, and other relief under New Jersey law. The Defendants intentionally, willfully, and repeatedly engaged in a pattern, practice, and/or policy of failing to keep accurate records of hours worked and failing to pay employees all wages due, including overtime wages for hours worked over forty in a workweek and, for some employees and workweeks, minimum wages and other wages due under New Jersey law. The Defendants' unlawful conduct has been intentional, willful, and in bad faith and has caused monetary damage to Plaintiffs, the FLSA Collective, and the New Jersey Class, says the complaint. The Plaintiffs were employed by the Defendants. TAVERNA ON THE HUDSON L.L.C. is a New Jersey limited liability company that owns and operates a restaurant located in Bayonne, New Jersey.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Clifford Tucker, Esq. SACCO & FILLAS LLP 3119 Newtown Avenue, Seventh Floor Astoria, NY 11102 Phone: 718-269-2243 Fax: 718-679-9660 Email: ctucker@saccofillas.com TEMPUS AI: Barone Sues for Loss of Privacy Over Info Disclosure --------------------------------------------------------------- Lauren Barone, Eugenia Rukhin, Stephanie Bianco, and Stephanie Bianco on behalf of her minor child H.B., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. TEMPUS AI, INC., ASTRAZENECA PLC, ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, and ASTRAZENECA LP, Defendants, Case No. 26-cv-03516 (N.D. Ill., March 30, 2026) is a class action alleging that Tempus AI compelled Ambry Genetics Corporation to disclose, as a condition of an acquisition agreement, valuable, highly sensitive genetic information Ambry collected from patients. The complaint relates that as a patient receiving medical services, Plaintiff Barone reasonably expected that their personally identifiable information including their highly sensitive medical and genetic information would remain private. Plaintiff Barone also reasonably expected that her personally identifiable information including her private medical and genetic information would be protected in accordance with applicable laws, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA"), the Illinois Genetic Information Privacy Act ("GIPA"), the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act ("CMIA"), and further in accordance with Ambry Genetics' representations that their information would be kept private. Unbeknownst to Plaintiff Barone, aided and abetted by AstraZeneca, Tempus AI compelled Ambry Genetics' disclosure of its repository of identifiable medical and genetic information available to Tempus AI, which, included Plaintiffs' personally identifying information and identifiable genetic testing results, notes the complaint. According to the complaint, Tempus AI caused the transfer and disclosure of this personally identifying, highly sensitive medical and genetic information for its own commercial benefit, without providing Ambry patients with notice of the disclosure, the opportunity to opt out or consent, or compensation for the value of their data. Worse, Tempus AI subsequently disclosed this genetic information to additional entities, including Defendant AstraZeneca, which knowingly aided and abetted Tempus AI's continuing violations of applicable privacy laws for their own commercial gain. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' wrongdoings, the Plaintiffs suffered a loss of their privacy, property interest in their Private Information, and emotional distress, among others, asserts the complaint. Plaintiffs face a continuing injury because Defendants continue to use her allegedly de-identified data in its AI models. Plaintiffs face the ongoing risk that Defendants or third parties may reidentify their allegedly de-identified data. Tempus AI deprived them of any opportunity to consent to or contest the use of their data, de-identified or otherwise, or to seek compensation for such use, the complaint says. For these reasons, the Plaintiffs assert claims for damages and other legal and equitable remedies for common law violations and violations of the GIPA, and the CMIA, and various state consumer and data protection statutes. Plaintiff Barone became an Ambry Genetics patient in the Fall of 2023 when she underwent genetic testing at the direction of her doctor. Plaintiff Rukhin became an Ambry Genetics patient in February 2024 when she underwent genetic testing ordered by her doctor in connection with certain health concerns. Plaintiff Bianco and her minor child, Plaintiff H.B., became Ambry Genetics patients in November of 2023 when, at the direction of her doctor, Plaintiff Bianco underwent genetic testing in connection with her pregnancy while Plaintiff H.B. was in utero. As part of Plaintiff Bianco's genetic test, genetic information was taken by Ambry from Plaintiff H.B. in utero. Defendant Tempus AI is a healthcare technology company founded in 2015 and incorporated in the state of Nevada with its principal place of business at 600 West Chicago Avenue, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60654. Defendant AstraZeneca PLC is a UK-based multinational holding company and the ultimate parent company of all AstraZeneca Defendants. Defendant AstraZeneca AB is a wholly-owned Swedish subsidiary of AstraZeneca PLC with its principal place of business at SE-151 85, Sodertalje, Sweden. Defendant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP is a limited partnership wholly-owned by AstraZeneca PLC,30 incorporated and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its United States headquarters located at 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850. Defendant AstraZeneca LP likewise is a limited partnership wholly-owned by AstraZeneca PLC,31 organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its United States headquarters located at 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Amy Keller, Esq. Rebecca Trickey, Esq. DICELLO LEVITT LLP 10 North Dearborn Street Sixth Floor Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: 312-214-7900 E-mail: akeller@dicellolevitt.com rtrickey@dicellolevitt.com - and - Michael P. Canty, Esq. Carol C. Villegas, Esq. Danielle Izzo, Esq. Gloria J. Medina, Esq. LABATON KELLER SUCHAROW LLP 140 Broadway New York, NY 10005 Telephone: 212-907-0700 Facsimile: 212-818-0477 E-mail: mcanty@labaton.com cvillegas@labaton.com dimazzeo@labaton.com gmedina@labaton.com UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX: Theus Suit Transferred to W.D. Texas ----------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Chaka Theus, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. University of Phoenix, Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-01151 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas on March 31, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-00796 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract. The University of Phoenix -- https://www.phoenix.edu/ -- is an online college that is accredited, affordable, and has degrees that align to careers.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Patrick N Keegan KEEGAN AND BAKER LLP 2292 Faraday Avenue Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 929-9303 Fax: (760) 929-9260 - and - Rosemary Carol Khoury Timothy Douglas Cohelan Isam C. Khoury COHELAN KHOURY AND SINGER 605 C Street Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (619) 595-3001 Fax: (619) 595-3000 The Defendants are represented by: David A. Yudelson, Esq. CONSTANGY BROOKS SMITH AND PROPHETE LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (310) 909-7775 Fax: (424) 465-6630 WATA INC: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Knight Extended to Oct. 29 -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Jacob Knight, et al., v. Wata, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-01873 (D. Colo., Filed July 28, 2022), the Hon. Judge Gordon P. Gallagher entered an order extending the date to file a third motion for class certification until Oct. 29, 2025. Nothing has been filed and that date is now close to five-months past. In addition, this Court addressed summary judgment on May 14, 2025. The Plaintiffs shall therefore show cause within ten (10) days why this action should not be closed. Failure by Plaintiffs to respond will result in dismissal and closure of this action. The suit alleges -- Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Wata operates as a video games company.[CC] WAYFAIR INC: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Wilson Suit Claims ----------------------------------------------------------- CHET MICHAEL WILSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WAYFAIR INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-11420-LTS (D. Mass., March 24, 2026) seeks to stop the Defendants' practice of making unsolicited calls. Wayfair Inc. retails household goods. The Company offers bed and living room, kitchen, dining, home entertainment, home office, game room and bar. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony I. Paronich, Esq. PARONICH LAW, P.C. 350 Lincoln Street, Suite 2400 Hingham, MA 02043 Telephone: (508) 221-1510 Email: anthony@paronichlaw.com WAYNE SALISBURY: Court Denies Inmate's Bid in "Morris" ------------------------------------------------------ In the case captioned as Richard Paiva, as successor to Joseph Morris, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Wayne Salisbury, in his capacity as Director of the State of Rhode Island Department of Corrections, as successor to Anthony Travisono, Defendant, C.A. No. 69-04192JJM-PAS (D.R.I.), United States Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island denied the motion of pro se inmate Class Member Joseph W. Shepard to enforce the Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g) duties of class counsel and for ancillary relief. Backgroud Originally filed in October 1969, this case is a class action on behalf of all the prisoners at the Adult Correctional Institution (ACI) and a separate sub-class action on behalf of those prisoners in the behavioral control unit. During the 1970s, the case ended in settlement resulting in the issuance of a permanent injunction impacting inmate discipline and related conditions of confinement, known as the Morris Rules. After a protracted period during which the case was inactive, the First Circuit reactivated it in December 2018. On December 18, 2019, successor Plaintiff Richard Paiva was allowed to intervene and designated as class representative, and successor class counsel Lynette Labinger and Sonja Deyoe were appointed by the Court. Since the case was revived, the Morris Rules injunction has been stayed and proceedings have been focused on inmate discipline and conditions of confinement, including the use of punitive segregation. In September 2020, the Court referred the case for court-annexed mediation, which has resulted in the voluntary adoption by the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC) of policies conferring significant benefits on the class, including a thirty-day limit on punitive segregation and an alteration in the manner for conducting disciplinary hearings. Shepard's Allegations Mr. Shepard alleged that class counsel refused to communicate with him for more than a year. He averred that he had written letters, attempted phone contact, and asked other inmates to contact class counsel, but that class counsel refused to provide information, particularly regarding the confidential mediation proceedings, stating that he is not a plaintiff in Morris/Paiva. Mr. Shepard claimed that class counsel's refusal to communicate left him without representation or guidance. He alleged violations of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g) including failure to clarify his class membership status, failure to provide updates, failure to address what he contended were violations of the Court's Interim Order, and failure to assist him regarding retaliation and constitutional violations. As remedies, Mr. Shepard sought written confirmation of class membership, orders requiring class counsel to respond to his communications, investigation into RIDOC's compliance with the Interim Order, and ultimately the recusal of class counsel and rescission of the mediation referral. Class Counsel's Response Class counsel represented that they communicated with Mr. Shepard about class-related matters many times, including in-person meetings, telephone calls, and letters, and that they specifically referenced his experiences, with his prior authorization, in advocacy during the confidential mediation. They further represented that, as class counsel, they will not provide individualized representation to class members to challenge individual disciplinary issues or the propriety of individual sanctions. Court's Findings The Court found that class counsel's representation of the interests of the class has been extremely diligent and fair, far better than merely adequate. The Court further found that class counsel have been consistently and appropriately attentive to communicating with class members, balanced by their duty to remain diligently focused on the interest of the class as a whole. The Court found that the relief Mr. Shepard sought would impose duties on class counsel that would interfere with their appropriate discharge of their duties to the class and would be contrary to the interests of the class. Accordingly, the Court denied Mr. Shepard's motion. A copy of the Court's decision is available https://tinyurl.com/mm9x2p56 from PacerMontitor.com WYNN RESORTS LIMITED: Broaddus Files Suit in D. Nevada ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Wynn Resorts, Limited. The case is styled as Shelby Broaddus, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Wynn Resorts, Limited, Case No. 2:26-cv-00907-APG-NJK (D. Nev., March 26, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. Wynn Resorts, Limited -- https://investors.wynnresorts.com/ -- is an American publicly traded corporation based in Paradise, Nevada, that is a developer and operator of high-end hotels and casinos.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Martin L. Welsh, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF HAYES & WELSH 199 North Arroyo Grande Blvd., Suite 200 Henderson, NV 89074 Phone: (702) 434-3444 Fax: (702) 434-3739 Email: mwelsh@lvlaw.com - and - Tyler A. Litke, Esq. LEVI & KORSINSK LLP 33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor New York, NY 10004 Phone: (212) 363-7500 Fax: (212) 363-7171 WYNN RESORTS: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Stroud Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------- TIMOTHY STROUD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WYNN RESORTS HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-00885 (D. Nev., March 24, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to properly secure and safeguard Plaintiff's and other similarly situated individuals' personally identifying information, which, according to media reports and upon information and belief, includes names, Social Security numbers, phone numbers, and other sensitive personal information. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that despite the Defendant's duty to safeguard the Private Information of Plaintiff and Class Members, their Private Information in the Defendant's possession was compromised on or about February 20, 2026, by the hacker group using the online moniker "ShinyHunters," who posted on its official dark web leak website that it stole 800,000 records containing Private Information from Defendant (the "Data Breach"). The Defendant disregarded the rights of the Plaintiff and Class Members by intentionally, willfully, recklessly, and negligently failing to implement adequate and reasonable measures to ensure that Plaintiff's and Class Members' PII was safeguarded, failing to take available steps to prevent unauthorized disclosure of data, and failing to follow applicable, required and appropriate protocols, policies, and procedures regarding the encryption of data, even for internal use, says the suit. Wynn Resorts Holdings, LLC operates as a holding company. The Company, through its subsidiaries, owns and operates a casino hotel resort property. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mark J. Bourassa, Esq. THE BOURASSA LAW GROUP 2350 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89102 Telephone: (702) 851-2180 Facsimile: (702) 851-2189 Email: mbourassa@blgwins.com - and - Jeffrey S. Goldenberg, Esq. GOLDENBERG SCHNEIDER, LPA 4445 Lake Forest Drive, Suite 490 Cincinnati, OH 45242 Telephone: (513) 345-8291 Email: jgoldenberg@gs-legal.com - and - Brett R. Cohen, Esq. LEEDS BROWN LAW, P.C. One Old Country Road, Suite 347 Carle Place, NY 11514 Telephone: (516) 873-9550 Email: bcohen@leedsbrownlaw.com - and - Charles E. Schaffer, Esq. Nicholas J. Elia, Esq. Caroline J. Bojarski, Esq. LEVIN SEDRAN & BERMAN LLP 510 Walnut Street, Suite 500 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Telephone: (215) 592-1500 Email: cschaffer@lfsblaw.com nelia@lfsblaw.com cbojarski@lfsblaw.com YEE-HAW BREWING: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, Archibald Says -------------------------------------------------------------- CORTEZ ARCHIBALD, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. YEE-HAW BREWING, LLC, OLE SMOKY DISTILLERY, LLC, and JOE BAKER, individually, Defendants, Case No. 3:26-cv-00371 (M.D. Tenn., March 30, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and other relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The complaint relates that the Plaintiff and similarly situated employees worked for Defendants at the 6th & Peabody venue in Nashville, Tennessee, where Defendants jointly operated a single integrated business. The Defendants maintained a common policy and practice of failing to pay overtime compensation by requiring employees to divide their hours worked in a single workweek between multiple payroll systems and/or corporate entities under Defendants' control. Under this scheme, employees performed continuous work under unified supervision for a single operation, but their hours were artificially split across Defendants' payroll systems to avoid paying overtime premiums. As a result, Plaintiff and similarly situated employees regularly worked in excess of 40 hours per workweek but were paid only straight time for all hours worked, adds the complaint. Plaintiff further brings a claim for retaliation under the FLSA based on Defendants' termination of his employment after he complained about their unlawful pay practices. Defendants' violations of the FLSA were willful, the suit asserts. Plaintiff Cortez Archibald is an adult resident of Nashville, Tennessee. He was employed by Defendants from June 2018 through June 14, 2025. Defendant Yee-Haw Brewing Company, LLC is a Tennessee limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tennessee. Defendant Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC is a Tennessee limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tennessee. Defendant Joe Baker is an owner, officer, and/or managing agent of Defendants Yee-Haw Brewing Company, LLC and Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC. Baker exercised operational control over Defendants' business operations, including their compensation policies, payroll practices, and timekeeping systems.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Philip E. Oliphant, Esq. THE ROLWES LAW FIRM, LLC 1951 Mignon Avenue Memphis, TN 38107 Telephone: 901-519-9135 Facsimile: 901-979-2499 E-mail: poliphant@rolweslaw.com [^] 10th Class Action Money & Ethics Conference -- 2026 Sponsors ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mark your calendar for the 10th Annual Class Action Money & Ethics Conference, presented by Beard Group, Inc. #CAME2026 will be held May 20-21, 2026, at The Harmonie Club, in New York City. This year's gathering is being sponsored by: * Class Action Money & Ethics 2026 Co-Chairs: Esquire Bank Succeed Boldly https://esquirebank.com/ EisnerAmper Smarter Safeguards. Stronger Outcomes. https://www.eisneramper.com/ * Major Sponsors: Labaton Keller Sucharow History of expertise. Reputation for excellence. https://www.labaton.com/ Covalynt The Bond Between Complex Litigation and Data Science. https://covalynt.com/ * Patron Sponsors: Duane Morris https://www.duanemorris.com/ Darrow Legal Intelligence that Drives Better Outcomes. https://www.darrow.ai/ Tremendous Send gift cards and money instantly https://www.tremendous.com/ Federated Hermes https://www.federatedhermes.com/ * Supporting Sponsors: Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein https://www.lieffcabraser.com/ AB Data https://www.abdataclassaction.com/ Contingency Capital Global asset management business focused on credit oriented legal assets https://www.contingencycapital.com/ Morgan Stanley Navigate Volatility. Unlock Opportunity. Active Fixed Income https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-pe/institutional-investor.html ATTICUS Administration Smart | Accountable | Better https://www.atticusadmin.com/ This exclusive in-person gathering brings together the industry's top professionals to explore the latest trends, challenges, and opportunities in class action litigation. #CAME2026 features: Insightful keynote presentations from leading experts Dynamic live panel discussions tackling cutting-edge issues Valuable networking opportunities with peers and influencers This year's event kicks off with the Opening Night Cocktail Reception on May 20th from 5:00–7:00 p.m. Whether you're a plaintiff attorney, defense counsel, funder, or industry stakeholder, this is the must-attend event of the year for staying ahead in class action practice. Register today and secure your spot at this value-packed conference! Click here -- https://www.classactionconference.com/2025-video-replays.html -- for the 2025 conference videos, available to purchase and download. For sponsorship and other information, contact Will Etchison at 305-707-7493 or will@beardgroup.com, or visit https://www.classactionconference.com/ CLE accreditation will be submitted upon request -- details available on the website. Asbestos Litigation ASBESTOS UPDATE: Allstate Sued by Trustee Over Asbestos Litigation ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bloomberg Law reports that the bankruptcy trustee for Nash Engineering Co. has initiated litigation against an Allstate affiliate, alleging the insurer improperly denied coverage for asbestos-related claims under a $5 million policy. The case was filed on March 17, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. The complaint asserts that Allstate Insurance Co., as successor to Northbrook Excess & Surplus Insurance Co., failed to meet its contractual obligations by refusing to pay for defense and settlement costs tied to thousands of asbestos lawsuits, the report states. The Chapter 7 trustee George Roumeliotis maintains that the insurer's conduct has adversely affected the bankruptcy estate, which has been tasked with resolving claims since Nash filed for insolvency in 2021. Roumeliotis is seeking damages, along with declaratory and other equitable relief, to compel coverage under the policy. The case reflects broader tensions between insurers and bankruptcy estates over responsibility for legacy tort liabilities, according to Bloomberg. ASBESTOS UPDATE: L'Oreal Faces Product Liability Lawsuit -------------------------------------------------------- HOMA REZAIE and SAEED AKHTAR, Plaintiffs v. L'OREAL TRAVEL RETAIL AMERICAS, INC., L'OREAL TRAVEL RETAILAMERICAS, INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to HELENA RUBINSTEIN INC. and YVES SAINT LAURENT AMERICA, INC., as successor-by-merger to SANOFI BEA UTE, INC., SANOFI BEAUTY PRODUCTS, INC., and YSL BEAUTE, INC. and d/b/a HELENA RUBINSTEIN, LANCOME, NINA RICCI, and YVES SAINT LAURENT, et al., Defendants, Case No. CACE-26-002786 (Fla. Cir., Broward Cty., 17th Judicial, February 17, 2026) is a class action arising from Plaintiffs' exposure to asbestos from the Defendants' asbestos-containing and/or asbestos-contaminated products. The complaint alleges that Defendant concealed the dangers of asbestos from Plaintiff, her family members, and others similarly situated without properly testing Defendants' prescription drug products to determine the harmful effects to persons exposed to asbestos from the use of such products; failed to take any reasonable precautions or to exercise reasonable care to adequately or sufficiently warn Plaintiff, her family members and others similarly situated of the risks, dangers and harms, to-wit: contracting diseases and suffering injuries such as asbestos pleural disease, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma or other forms of cancers to which Plaintiff was exposed by personally using, coming in contact with, handling, sweeping, removing, and exposure to the asbestos dust and fibers from Defendants' products; and caused Plaintiff to contract mesothelioma, which arose out of the acts and omissions which occurred in the State of Florida during the relevant period of time, at which time Defendants were engaged in solicitation or service activities within the State of Florida. L'Oreal Travel Retail Americas, Inc. was founded in 1991. The Company's line of business includes the wholesale distribution of prescription drugs, proprietary drugs, and toiletries.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Rebecca S. Vinocur, Esq. REBECCA S. VINOCUR, P.A. 5915 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 14 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Telephone: (786) 691-1282 Facsimile: (786) 691-1283 E-mail: rvinocur@rsv-law.com - and - Brendan J. Tully, Esq. SIMON GREENSTONE PANATIER, PC 420 Lexington A venue, Suite 2848 New York, NY 10170 Telephone: (212) 634-1690 E-mail: btully@sgptrial.com ********* S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA. Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L. Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors. Copyright 2026. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272. This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the publishers. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed. The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000. *** End of Transmission ***