260331.mbx

260331.mbx C L A S S A C T I O N R E P O R T E R Tuesday, March 31, 2026, Vol. 28, No. 64 Headlines AEROTECH INC: Schultz Wins Bid for Class Certification AGI CARGO LLC: Gumbs Suit Removed to C.D. California AHAAA LLC: Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Bid Response AIR PRODUCTS: Camcara Bid to Certify Class Tossed as Moot AMAZON.COM: Class Cert. Bid Filing Extended to June 16 AMGEN INC: Class Cert. Bid Opposition Due April 23 AMP FIT: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Wilson Suit Due Dec. 2 ASSERTIVE CONSULTANTS: Wilson Files TCPA Suit in N.D. Ohio ATERIAN INC: Faces Brannon Class Suit in New Jersey AUTO REPUBLIC: Vazquez TCPA Suit Removed to M.D. Florida BANNER CAPITAL BANK: Gross Files Suit in D. Nebraska BARON APP: Faces Ohler Sues Over Illegal Service Fees BAYER CO AG: Mason Files Suit in D. Vermont BERKELEY, CA: Prado Suit Seeks to Continue Class Cert. Hearing BON SECOURS COMMUNITY: Schlaugies Suit Removed to S.D. New York BROOKDALE SENIOR: McDonald Suit Seeks to Certify Class Action CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS': Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Roberson Says CBE GROUP INC: Clark Files TCPA Suit in C.D. California CENTERWELL PHARMACY: Friedman Files Suit in W.D. Kentucky CERNER CORPORATION: Fails to Protect Sensitive Data, Shaffer Says CIRCANA INC: Bakula Suit Removed to C.D. California COASTAL RIDGE MANAGEMENT: May Suit Removed to D. Minnesota COLUMBIA DEBT RECOVERY: Saha Files TCPA Suit in M.D. Florida CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA: Class Cert. Bid in Moore Suit Due July 20 COSTCO WHOLESALE: Ortiz Seeks Refund of Unlawful IEEPA Tariffs COUNTRY CLUB: Class Cert Bid Filing in Tiwari Due July 15 DANAHER CORP: Class Cert Bid Filing in Hawkins Suit Due April 17 DANAHER CORPORATION: Nadeau Sues for Racial, Gender Discrimination DEBTHELP INC: Salaiz Files Suit in Tex. Dist. Ct. DONALD TRUMP: Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Bid Response DYNAMIC NAIL: Faces Pelaez Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ELIAS J & L: Gordillo Sues Over Wage and Hour Law Violations EMANUEL MEDICAL: ClassAction.org Investigates Data Breach EPISOURCE LLC: Class Cert Bid Filing Continued to July 17 EVERBRIDGE INC: Sylebra Seeks to Certify Class Action FEDEX CORP: Collects Unauthorized IEEPA-Tariffs, Tran Suit Alleges FEDEX CORP: Faces Ross Suit Over Unlawful IEEPA-Tariff Collection FIFTH THIRD BANK: Bid for Class Cert. in Howards Due Dec. 21 FINWISE BANCORP: Mediation Fails in Minter Data Breach Suit FISH BEAR: Clark Gambling Suit Removed to N.D. Ala. FLAMINGO PLAZA: Brito Sues Over Facilities' ADA Non-Compliance FOOTWEAR UNLIMITED: Bennett Suit Removed to W.D. Wash. FORT LAUDERDALE, FL: Court Dismisses Jackson Suit FREEDOM SOLAR PROS: Campbell Suit Removed to C.D. California GAYTAN & PINEDA: Ramos Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. GOLDMAN SACHS: 4th Cir. Affirms Denial of Arbitration Bid in Brown H MART LOS ANGELES: Xocol Sues Over Failure to Pay Compensation HATEM BROTHERS: Faces Saenz Suit Over Property's Access Barriers HERTZ GLOBAL: Doller Seeks to Certify Class HESS BAKKEN: Allowed Leave to File Docs Under Seal HIGH QUALITY RESTORATION: Boddy Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. HUMANA INC: Bland Files TCPA Suit in M.D. Pennsylvania ILLINOIS: Denial of Class Certification Bid in Boyce v. Cox Upheld INCORPORATED VILLAGE: Ortiz Seeks Update on Discovery Schedule JBS LIVE: Force Seeks to File Oversized Brief KAPLAN NORTH: Fails to Protect Clients' Info, Remsen Suit Alleges KASA LIVING: Hotel Rooms Inaccessible to Disabled, Niles Says KICKS CREW: Intercepts Electronic Communications, Ramos Says KRIGLER BEVERLY HILLS: Dodds Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. KRISTI NOEM: EMPC Seeks to Certify Rule 23 Class Action KRISTI NOEM: Plaintiffs Allowed File Supplemental Complaint KROGER CO: Kirkbride Seeks Prelim OK of Settlement Deal LEVAIN BAKERY: Douglass Seeks Final OK of Settlement Deal LEWIS DRUGS INC: Schneider Files Suit in D. South Dakota LIMITED RUN: Court OK's $2.72MM Settlement in Carbone LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS: Wyrosdick Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. MEMORIAL HEART: Settlement Deal in Allen Gets Initial OK MEMORIAL HEART: Settlement Deal in Cahill Gets Initial Nod MEMORIAL HEART: Settlement Deal in Cordes Wins Initial OK MEMORIAL HEART: Settlement Deal in Edwards Gets Initial OK MEMORIAL HEART: Settlement Deal in Jackson Gets Prelim Nod META PLATFORMS: Filing for Class Cert. Bid in Gershzon Due June 26 META PLATFORMS: Gershzon Seeks Extension of Briefing Deadlines METAL-MATIC LLC: Bailey Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime MICROGENICS CORP: Scheduling Order in Warrick Suit Entered MOBIS NORTH: Chavis Files Suit Over FLSA Violation MONSANTO COMPANY: Carlisle Sues Over Harmful Roundup Herbicide MONSANTO COMPANY: Collins Sues Over Hazardous Roundup Herbicide MONSANTO COMPANY: Combest Sues Over Defective Roundup Herbicide MONSANTO COMPANY: Coyle Sues Over Unsafe Roundup Herbicide MONSANTO COMPANY: Evans Sues Over Roundup's Health Hazards MONSANTO COMPANY: Faulkner Sues Over Harmful Roundup Herbicide MONSANTO COMPANY: Ivey Sues Over Roundup's Health Hazards MONSANTO COMPANY: Kalpas Sues Over Negligent Herbicide Distribution MONSANTO COMPANY: Little Sues Over Wrongful Advertising & Sale MONSANTO COMPANY: Llamas Sues Over Negligent Advertising & Sale MONSANTO COMPANY: Sierra Sues Over Negligent Herbicide Sale MONSANTO COMPANY: Smith-Dixon Sues Over Negligent Distribution MONSANTO COMPANY: Wisley Sues Over Wrongful Sale of Herbicide NATIONAL RIFLE: Dell'Aquila Seeks to Certify Two Classes NATIONAL RURAL: Mullins Wins Bid for Class Certification NATIONAL TENANT: Review of Order Certifying Class Action Sought NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS: Barrientes Sues Over Data Breach NESTLE HEALTHCARE: Court Dismisses Horti Class Suit NEW LOOK COSMETICS: Guerrero Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. NOVOLEX SHIELDS: Coulter Suit Removed to E.D. Washington NTT DATA: Parties Seek Extension of Briefing Deadlines NUCOR CORPORATION: Class Settlement in Sweat Suit Gets Initial Nod NUTRIEN AG: Conspires to Raise Fertilizers' Prices, Rumbold Says OCHSNER CLINIC: Taylor Seeks to Certify Rule 23 Class Action OGORGEOUS INC: Beikirch Sues Over Unlawful Hidden Fees PALAMERICAN SECURITY: Rigazio Suit Removed to N.D. California PBT BANCORP: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Voltaire Suit Due Oct. 14 PINK DOOR INC: Harris Suit Removed to N.D. California PLANET LABS: Mediation Hearing Set for May 7 PLANNED PARENTHOOD: Hinton Seeks Courtroom Sealing on Hearing POWER SOLUTIONS: Bids for Lead Plaintiff Appointment Due May 19 PRANA LIVING: Blind Users Can't Access Website, Dalton Suit Claims PRISMA HEALTH: Mullins Alleges Breach of Fiduciary Duties QUATRRO BUSINESS: ClassAction.org Investigates Data Breach RANLIFE REAL: Extension of Class Cert Deadline Sought REMEDY MEDS: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Savage Claims REYNOLDS CONSUMER: Class Cert. Filing in Breitzman Due Sept. 23 SAJAN CAFE: Godoy Seeks Proper Wages for Cafeteria Employees SCRIPPS HEALTH: Filing for Class Cert. Bid Due Sept. 11 SEMTECH CORP: Continues to Defend Consolidated Securities Suit SEMTECH CORP: Continues to Defend Securities Derivative Suits SITUSAMC HOLDINGS: Class Cert. Bid Filing Due June 14, 2027 SOFI TECHNOLOGIES: Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Data Breach SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES: Consolidated Derivative Suit Stayed SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES: Continues to Defend Derivative Suit SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES: Fact Discovery in Securities Suit Ongoing SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES: Isaac Derivative Suit Stayed SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES: Maddox Derivative Suit Stayed STAGWELL INC: Scarantino Sues Over Charter's Noncompliance to DGCL SUPER MICRO: Faces Class Suit Over Export Control Laws Violations SWIFT PORK: Force Seeks Leave to File Oversized Brief SYNERGY HEALTH AST: Carmona Suit Removed to N.D. California THC – ORANGE COUNTY: Lawson Suit Removed to S.D. California THRASIO LLC: Stain Removers Contains Bacteria, Dickinson Says TOBIAS READ: Martin Wins Bid for TRO TOULA JNY: Randolph Sues Over Website's Equal Access to the Blind TOYOTA MOTOR: Reply on Bid to Exclude Expert Testimony Due April 10 TWIST BIOSCIENCE: Peters Seeks to Certify Rule 23 Class TYREE OIL: Stevens Sues Over Failure to Secure Clients' Info UNION PLAZA NURSING: Phillips Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. UNITED STATES: Peralta Sues Over Warrantless Arrests in Ohio UNITED STATES: Seeks to Replace Documents with Redacted Versions UNITED STATES: Standing Order Entered in Hassan Class Suit UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: Court Junks Moeller Suit with Prejudice UPONOR INC: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Harwood Suit Due Sept. 21 VENEZUELA: Mazzaccone Seeks to Certify Class of ISIN Holders VENEZUELA: Must Oppose Cavara Class Certification Bid by June 3 VF OUTDOOR LLC: Beltran Files Suit in N.D. California WA CUSHION: Bermudez Suit Seeks to Certify Classes WE CARE OUTPATIENT: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Williard Alleges WEST VIRGINIA EMS: Rose Suit Removed to S.D. West Virginia WESTECH SECURITY: Rodriguez Wins Class Cert Bid WESTERN RANGE: Class Cert Filing in Alvarado Due March 4, 2027 WESTERN RANGE: Parties Seek to Amend Scheduling Order WHITESTONE HOME: Hollingsworth Sues Over Unpaid Wages [^] 10th Class Action Money & Ethics Conference -- 2026 Sponsors ********* AEROTECH INC: Schultz Wins Bid for Class Certification ------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as STEPHANIE SCHULTZ et al., v. AEROTECH, INC. and AEROTECH, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST COMMITTEE, Case No. 2:24-cv-00618-WSH (W.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge W. Scott Hardy entered an order granting the Plaintiff's motion for class certification as follows: 1. The Court finds that the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(1) have been satisfied with respect to the proposed class described as follows: "All participants and beneficiaries of the Aerotech, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust since April 24, 2018, excluding the Plan's fiduciaries." 2. The Plaintiffs Stephanie Schultz, Kevin Plummer, and Chad Huffer are appointed as Class Representatives of the certified class. 3. The law firms of Engstrom Lee LLC and Casey Jones Law Firm are appointed as Class Counsel. 4. By April 27, 2026, counsel for the parties shall confer in good faith and jointly submit a proposed notice and notice plan to the Court for approval. 5. Nothing herein shall prevent Defendants from moving to decertify the class for good cause shown upon meritorious grounds for doing so. Aerotech is an automation company that provides 3D metrology, positioning, and custom-engineered motion solutions. A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=q30g0u at no extra charge.[CC] AGI CARGO LLC: Gumbs Suit Removed to C.D. California ---------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Jaylen Gumbs, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and current and former aggrieved employees v. AGI Cargo, LLC, Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No. 28STCV00991 was removed from Los Angeles Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on March 16, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02833 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Labor. AGI Cargo, LLC -- https://agi.aero/ -- engages in the operating and maintaining of airports and flying fields.[BN] The Plaintiff appears pro se. The Defendant is represented by: Marissa Hurwitz Alguire, Esq. AKERMAN LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 6400 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: (213) 688-9500 Fax: (213) 627-6342 Email: marissa.alguire@akerman.com AHAAA LLC: Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Bid Response ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOSÉ CHAMUL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. AHAAA, LLC d/b/a HARRY's BAR & RESTAURANT, Case No. 9:25-cv-81013-DSL (S.D. Fla.), the Defendant asks the Court to enter an order granting unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to: -- the Plaintiff's motion to certify class for conditional certification of FLSA collective up to and including March 20, 2026; and -- Plaintiff's Motion to certify class pursuant to Rule 23 for Florida Minimum Wage Act Claim [and up to and including March 27, 2026. On Feb. 27, 2026, the Plaintiff filed both its motion to certify class for conditional certification of FLSA Collective and the Plaintiff's motion to certify class pursuant to Rule 23 for Florida Minimum Wage Act Claim. The Defendant owns and operates a restaurant location at 384 S. Rosemary Ave., West Palm Beach, Florida. A copy of the Defendant's motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=pAs0Fj at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendant is represented by: Justin Edell, Esq. Jessica D. Anderson, Esq. COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 500 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561) 612-3479 Facsimile: (561) 683-8977 E-mail: justin.edell@csklegal.com AIR PRODUCTS: Camcara Bid to Certify Class Tossed as Moot --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as CAMCARA, INC., d/b/a AST WATERJET, v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., Case No. 5:21-cv-02264-JLS (E.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge Schmehl entered an order denying as moot the Plaintiff's motion to certify class and the Defendant's motions to seal. Air Products produces industrial atmospheric and specialty gases and performance materials and equipment. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=UTgtWM at no extra charge.[CC] AMAZON.COM: Class Cert. Bid Filing Extended to June 16 ------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Hamilton v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, Case No. 1:22-cv-00434 (D. Colo., Filed Feb. 17, 2022), the Hon. Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered an order granting unopposed fourth motion to amend the scheduling order. Accordingly, certain deadlines are extended as follows: -- Motion for Class Certification: June 16, 2026 -- Damages Discovery: Oct 16, 2026 -- Dispositive Motions: Jan. 29, 2027 -- Designate Affirmative Experts: Nov. 20, 2026 -- Designate Rebuttal Experts: Dec. 18, 2026 The Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/23/2026 is vacated and reset for March 3, 2027, at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. A proposed final pretrial order shall be submitted on or before Feb. 24, 2027. The nature of suit states Labor Litigation. Amazon.com provides e-commerce services.[CC] AMGEN INC: Class Cert. Bid Opposition Due April 23 -------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund v. Amgen Inc. et al. (RE AMGEN INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION), Case No. 1:23-cv-02138-JPC-HJR (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Ricardo entered an order extending date for upcoming deadlines as follows: Event Deadline Class Certification Opposition: April 23, 2026 Protective Order Reply: April 24, 2026 Class Certification Reply: June 23, 2026 Meet and Confer regarding fact and expert July 2, 2026 discovery schedule: Deadline for completing depositions: Aug. 31, 2026 Close of fact discovery: Sept. 9, 2026 Close of expert discovery: Jan. 11, 2027 No further extensions of the Class Certification briefing schedule will be granted. Amgen is an American multinational biopharmaceutical company. A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=XzvVb0 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Samuel H. Rudman, Esq. Evan J. Kaufman, Esq. Mark T. Millkey, Esq. Avital O. Malina, Esq. Skyler J. Sands, Esq. Jason R. Edelman, Esq. ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 Melville, NY 11747 Telephone: (631) 367-7100 E-mail: srudman@rgrdlaw.com ekaufman@rgrdlaw.com mmillkey@rgrdlaw.com amalina@rgrdlaw.com ssands@rgrdlaw.com jedelman@rgrdlaw.com The Defendant is represented by: Jay B. Kasner, Esq. Tansy Woan, Esq. Michael W. Restey Jr., Esq. Jacob G. Lefkowitz, Esq. Peter Morrison, Esq. SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP One Manhattan West New York, NY 10001 Telephone: (212) 735-3000 E-mail: jay.kasner@skadden.com tansy.woan@skadden.com michael.restey@skadden.com jacob.lefkowitz@skadden.com peter.morrison@skadden.com AMP FIT: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Wilson Suit Due Dec. 2 --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Wilson v. AMP FIT, INC., Case No. 3:25-cv-01741 (D. Or., Filed Sept. 25, 2025), the Hon. Judge Michael H. Simon entered an order adopting the case schedule outlined in the parties' Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan as follows: (1) Amend pleadings and add parties not later than July 2, 2026; (2) Initial expert disclosures are due not later than September 30, 2026; (3) Rebuttal expert disclosures are due not later than November 2, 2026; (4) Discovery is to be completed not later than October 30, 2026; (5) Motion for class certification is due not later than Dec. 2, 2026; and (6) Dispositive motions are due not later than Jan. 5, 2027. The suit alleges violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). AMP is an AI-powered smart home gym technology company.[CC] ASSERTIVE CONSULTANTS: Wilson Files TCPA Suit in N.D. Ohio ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Assertive Consultants LLC. The case is styled as Peter Wilson, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. Assertive Consultants LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-00608-DAP (N.D. Ohio, March 16, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Assertive Consultation Services, LLC -- http://www.assertiveconsultationservices.com/-- specializes in landlord-tenant relations, notary services, and financial literacy education.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brian T. Giles, Esq. GILES & HARPER-CINCINNATI 7247 Beechmont Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45230 Phone: (513) 379-2715 Email: bgiles@gilesharper.com ATERIAN INC: Faces Brannon Class Suit in New Jersey --------------------------------------------------- Aterian, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2026, that the Company faces the Brannon class suit related to the violations of New Jersey Products Liability Act. it announced a voluntary recall in coordination with the CPSC in February 2026 for approximately 195,000 units of its PurSteam Mighty Lil Steamers and Elite Travel Steamers due to reports of hot water expelling from the nozzle. The Company has incurred, and expects to continue to incur, costs related to this recall, including refund payments and legal expenses. As a result of this recall, a putative class action complaint, Sarah Brannon v. Aterian, Inc., was filed against the Company on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleges various violations, including breach of implied warranty, unjust enrichment, consumer protection violations, product liability claims, and violations of the New Jersey Products Liability Act, and seeks unspecified damages and other relief. While the Company ceased selling these steamers in 2024, the defense of this existing litigation, and the potential for additional product liability or class action lawsuits, could result in significant legal expenses, settlements, or judgments. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter and, at this time, is unable to reasonably estimate a potential loss or range of loss associated with this litigation. Aterian, Inc. is a technology-enabled consumer products company that builds, acquires, and partners with e-commerce brands, leveraging data and machine learning to optimize product development, marketing, and sales primarily across online marketplaces. AUTO REPUBLIC: Vazquez TCPA Suit Removed to M.D. Florida -------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Jesus Ivan Vazquez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Auto Republic LLC, Case No. 35-02026-CA-000173 was removed from the Fifth Judicial Circuit, to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida on March 16, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 5:26-cv-00198 to the proceeding. The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Auto Republic -- https://www.auto-republic.com/ -- offers quality used cars and pickup trucks for sale in Fullerton, California.[BN] The Plaintiff appears pro se. The Defendant is represented by: Blake Landis, Esq. TROUTMAN AMIN, LLP 1825 NW Corporate Blvd Suite 100 Boca Raton, FL 33431 Phone: (772) 538-9000 Email: landis@troutmanamin.com BANNER CAPITAL BANK: Gross Files Suit in D. Nebraska ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Banner Capital Bank. The case is styled as Leslie Gross, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Banner Capital Bank, Case No. 7:26-cv-05007-JFB-RCC (D. Neb., March 16, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. Banner Capital Bank -- https://www.bcbank.net/ -- is an employee-owned company, that was founded in 1964 in the countryside farming town of Harrisburg Nebraska.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott Edward Cole, Esq. Laura Grace Van Note, Esq. COLE & VAN NOTE 555 12th Street, Suite 1725, Suite 1725 Oakland, CA 94607 Phone: (510) 891-9800 Email: sec@colevannote.com lvn@colevannote.com BARON APP: Faces Ohler Sues Over Illegal Service Fees ----------------------------------------------------- Tyler Ohler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Baron App, Inc. (DBA Cameo), Defendant, Case No. 5:26-cv-01216 (C.D. Cal., March 16, 2026) is a putative class action brought by the Plaintiff, on behalf of California consumers, who were similarly charged illegal service fees by the Defendant in violation of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, the Unfair Competition Law, and the False Advertising Law. Cameo sells videos and messages through its website, cameo.com, and app. Cameo's homepage invites consumers to search by categories of celebrities, best sellers, or search terms. The homepage displays some prices for selected videos. The displayed prices do not include any service fees. And while the price has a "+" symbol, to reasonable consumers this suggests that the price may be higher for a higher quality or more elaborate video (not that the price will be inflated by junk fees). The complaint alleges that Cameo uses drip pricing: advertising a lower price for videos up front, only to tack on junk "service" fees at the end. Baron App, Inc. sells California consumers personalized videos or messages from celebrities (e.g., actors, athletes, influencers, and musicians).[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jonas Jacobson, Esq. Simon Franzini, Esq. DOVEL & LUNER, LLP 201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Telephone: (310) 656-7066 Facsimile: (310) 656-7069 E-mail: jonas@dovel.com simon@dovel.com BAYER CO AG: Mason Files Suit in D. Vermont ------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Bayer Co AG, et al. The case is styled as Lance Mason, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Bayer Co AG; Monsanto Co. et al.; Solutia, Inc. et al.; Pharmacia LLC et al.; Burlington High School, (BHS) et al.; Jane & John Does, other similarly situated to be named, Case No. 2:26-cv-00078-cr (D. Vt., March 16, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Personal Inj. Prod. Liability. Bayer -- https://www.bayer.com/en/ -- is a global enterprise with core competencies in the Life Science fields of health care and agriculture.[BN] The Plaintiff appears pro se. BERKELEY, CA: Prado Suit Seeks to Continue Class Cert. Hearing -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as YESICA PRADO, et al., v. CITY OF BERKELEY, Case No. 3:23-cv-04537-EMC (N.D. Cal.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order granting joint stipulation and request to continue motion for class certification hearing date and related dates: The Court continue the hearing date on Plaintiffs' motion for class certification from April 23, 2026 to May 7, 2026, or a date thereafter that is convenient for the Court, continue the deadline for Defendant to file any Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification from March 19, 2026 to April 2, 2026, and continue the deadline for Plaintiffs to file any Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification from April 2, 2026 to April 16, 2026. The Defendant retained new additional counsel, Ruth M. Bond and Rahi Azizi, with Atkinson Andelson Loya Ruud & Romo in this matter. Berkeley is a city on the eastern shore of San Francisco Bay in northern Alameda County, California. A copy of the Parties' motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=xbOd7y at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Brigitte Nicoletti, Esq. EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER 2001 Center Street, Fourth Floor Berkeley, CA 94704 Telephone: (510) 548-4040 E-mail: bnicoletti@ebclc.org - and - Thomas Zito, Esq. Michael Nunez, Esq. Sean Betouliere, Esq. Jameelah Najieb, Esq. Brigitte Nicoletti, Esq. DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 2001 Center Street, Third Floor Berkeley, CA 94704-1204 Telephone: (510) 665-8644 E-mail: tzito@dralegal.org mnunez@dralegal.org sbetouliere@dralegal.org jnajieb@dralegal.org The Defendant is represented by: Ruth M. Bond, Esq. Rahi Azizi, Esq. ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO 3 Harbor Drive, Suite 200 Sausalito, CA 94965-1491 Telephone: (628) 234-6200 Facsimile: (628) 234-6899 E-mail: Ruth.Bond@aalrr.com Rahi.Azizi@aalrr.com - and - Farimah Faiz Brown, Esq. Christopher Jensen, Esq. Laura Iris Mattes, Esq. Ashley M. Carter, Esq. Katrina Eiland, Esq. BERKELEY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 2180 Milvia Street, Fourth Floor Berkeley, CA 94704 Telephone: (510) 981-6998 Facsimile: (510) 981-6960 E-mail: Cjensen@berkeleyca.gov BON SECOURS COMMUNITY: Schlaugies Suit Removed to S.D. New York --------------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Stephen Schlaugies, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Bon Secours Community Hospital, Good Samaritan Hospital, St. Anthony Community Hospital, Case No. EF001761-2026 was removed from the New York State Supreme Court, Orange County, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 16, 2026. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 7:26-cv-02127 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. Bon Secours Community Hospital is a hospital in Port Jervis, New York.[BN] The Plaintiff appears pro se. The Defendant is represented by: Jessica Huse Fernandez, Esq. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111 Phone: (212) 589-4604 Email: jfernandez@bakerlaw.com BROOKDALE SENIOR: McDonald Suit Seeks to Certify Class Action ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as MONIQUE McDONALD, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC. 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, v. BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., Case No. 3:25-cv-00094 (M.D. Tenn.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order: (1) certifying a class action and certifying the following proposed Class definition: "All participants and beneficiaries in the Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan at any time on or after Jan. 24, 2019, and continuing to the date of judgment, or such earlier date that the Court determines is appropriate and just, including any beneficiary of a deceased person who was a participant in the Plan at any time during the Class Period;" (2) Appointing the Plaintiff as representative for the Class; and (3) Appointing the Plaintiff's counsel as counsel for the Class. The Defendant owns and operates retirement homes across the United States. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=0znGW8 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: James E. Miller, Esq. Laurie Rubinow, Esq. Alec J. Berin, Esq. Anna K. D'Agostino, Esq. MILLER SHAH LLP 65 Main Street Chester, CT 06412 Telephone: (866) 540-5505 Facsimile: (866) 300-7367 E-mail: jemiller@millershah.com lrubinow@millershah.com ajberin@millershah.com akdagostino@millershah.com - and - J. Gerard Stranch, IV, Esq. STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC The Freedom Center 223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200 Nashville, TN 37203 Telephone: (615) 254-8801 Facsimile: (615) 255-5419 E-mail: gstranch@stranchlaw.com CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS': Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Roberson Says ---------------------------------------------------------------- JOSHUA ROBERSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS' SERVICE, D/B/A BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26CV169340 (Cal. Sup., Alameda Cty., Feb. 6, 2026) is an action against the Defendants for failure to pay minimum wages, overtime compensation, authorize and permit meal and rest periods, provide accurate wage statements, and reimburse necessary business expenses. Plaintiff Roberson was employed by the Defendants as a staff. California Physicians' Service, doing business as Blue Shield of California, operates as a non-profit organization. The Organization provides group and individual term life, accidental death and dismemberment, vision, and stop loss insurance products. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jonathan M. Lebe, Esq. Brielle D. Edborg, Esq. Nicole A. Bloomfield, Esq. LEBE LAW, APLC 3900 W Alameda Avenue, Fifteenth Floor Burbank, CA 91505 Telephone: (213) 444-1973 Email: Jon@lebelaw.com Brielle@lebelaw.com Nicole@lebelaw.com CBE GROUP INC: Clark Files TCPA Suit in C.D. California ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against The CBE Group, Inc. The case is styled as Matthew Ross Clark, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. The CBE Group, Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-02757-SVW-AJR (C.D. Cal., March 16, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The CBE Group, Inc. -- https://cbegroup.com/ -- is a credit information and accounts receivable management company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gerald Donald Lane, Jr., Esq. THE LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI 1515 NE 26TH Street Wilton Manors, FL 33305 Phone: (754) 444-7539 Email: gerald@jibraellaw.com CENTERWELL PHARMACY: Friedman Files Suit in W.D. Kentucky --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against CenterWell Pharmacy Inc., et al. The case is styled as Stephen Friedman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CenterWell Pharmacy Inc., Humana, Inc. Case No. 3:26-cv-00176-RGJ (W.D. Ky., March 12, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. CenterWell Pharmacy -- https://www.centerwellpharmacy.com/ -- a Humana company, is committed to your health and wellbeing through the mail-order delivery of maintenance.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mark Reich, Esq. Melissa G. Meyer, Esq. LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP 33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor New York, NY 10004 Phone: 212-363-7500 Fax: 212-363-7171 Email: mreich@zlk.com mmuller@zlk.com - and - William Harris Mapes, Esq. ALEX DAVIS LAW PSC 445 Baxter Avenue, Ste 275 Louisville, KY 40204 Phone: (502) 882-6000 Fax: (502) 587-2007 Email: will@acdavislaw.com CERNER CORPORATION: Fails to Protect Sensitive Data, Shaffer Says ----------------------------------------------------------------- DELISA SHAFFER, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CERNER CORPORATION D/B/A ORACLE HEALTH, and METHODIST LE BONHEUR HEALTHCARE, Defendants, Case No. 4:26-cv-00231-RK (W.D. Mo., March 18, 2026) arises from Defendants' failure to protect highly sensitive data. The complaint relates that the Defendants store a litany of highly sensitive personal identifiable information ("PII") and protected health information ("PHI")--together "PII/PHI" or "Private Information"--about their current and former patients. But Defendants lost control over that data when cybercriminals infiltrated their insufficiently protected computer systems in the Data Breach. In a letter dated December 4, 2025, Methodist notified Shaffer that, "[o]n April 11, 2025, the vendor informed us that an unauthorized third party gained access to legacy Cerner systems as early as January 22, 2025 and obtained certain data," and that, "[o]n October 7, 2025, the vendor [Oracle Health] provided us with a list of patients whose information was involved in this incident. On October 7, 2025, Oracle Health provided Methodist with a "list of patients whose information was involved in this incident." The types of PII/PHI exposed may include Plaintiff's name, Social Security number, and information included within patient medical records, such as medical record numbers, doctors, diagnoses, medicines, test results, images, care and treatment. The Defendants waited until December 4, 2025, before it began notifying the class--more than 300 days after the Data Breach began--thereby depriving the Classes of the opportunity to try and mitigate their injuries in a timely manner, the complaint asserts. As a result of the Data Breach, Plaintiff faces a lifetime risk of identity theft, as her Private Information compromised in the Data Breach includes sensitive data that cannot be changed. She is also worried about the impact on her family's ability to manage her finances in the case that she becomes unable to, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks all monetary and non monetary relief allowed by law, including damages, restitution, punitive damages, injunctive relief, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. Plaintiff Delisa Shaffer, a data breach victim, received care from Methodist before the Data Breach. Defendant Oracle Health, formerly Cerner Corporation, is the second-largest electronic health record ("EHR") vendor in the United States, holding about 22% of the U.S. EHR industry. Defendant Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare is a healthcare provider based in Tennessee and operates four Memphis-area hospitals.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Norman E. Siegel, Esq. Barrett J. Vahle, Esq. STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP 460 Nichols Road, Suite 200 Kansas City, MO 64113 Telephone: (816) 714-7112 E-mail: siegel@stuevesiegel.com vahle@stuevesiegel.com - and - Tyler W. Hudson, Esq. WAGSTAFF & CARTMELL LLP 4740 Grand Ave., Suite #300 Kansas City, MO 64112 Telephone: (816) 701-1100 Facsimile: (816) 531-2372 E-mail: thudson@wcllp.com - and - Lynn A. Toops, Esq. Amina A. Thomas, Esq. COHENMALAD, LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Telephone: (317) 636-6481 Facsimile: (317) 636-2593 E-mail: ltoops@cohenmalad.com athomas@cohenmalad.com CIRCANA INC: Bakula Suit Removed to C.D. California --------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Michelle Bakula, an individual, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. CIRCANA, INC., a Delaware corporation; CIRCANA, LLC, a Delaware corporation; NC SOLUTIONS, LLC, a Delaware corporation; HOLLY KNIGHTLY, an individual, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No. 26STCV03921 was removed from the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, to the United States District Court for the Central District of California on March 16, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02797. In the complaint, Plaintiff raises purported individual claims for: Race Discrimination in Violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"); Retaliation in Violation of FEHA; Harassment Based on Race in Violation of FEHA; Failure to Prevent Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation; Whistleblower Retaliation in Violation of Labor Code Sections 98.6 and 1102.5; Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy; Intentional Misrepresentation; Negligent Misrepresentation; Failure to Provide a Safe and Healthful Workplace in Violation of Labor Code Section 3600; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; Breach of Contract; and Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. The Plaintiff also raises putative class action allegations for various wage and hour claims, including alleged: Failure to Pay Wages; Failure to Pay All Wages at Termination; Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage Statements; Failure to Reimburse Expenses; and Unfair Business Practices.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Christopher A. Stecher, Esq. Simon M. Levy, Esq. Claudia M. Coleman, Esq. FBT GIBBONS LLP 1 MacArthur Place, Suite 200 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Phone: (714) 852-6800 Fax: (714) 852-6899 Email: cstecher@fbtgibbons.com slevy@fbtgibbons.com ccolemans@fbtgibbons.com COASTAL RIDGE MANAGEMENT: May Suit Removed to D. Minnesota ---------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Matthew May, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Coastal Ridge Management, LLC, Case No. 27-01-26-4086 was removed from the District Court of the State of Minnesota, Fourth Judicial District, County of Hennepin, to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on March 16, 2026, and assigned Case No. 0:26-cv-01893. The Complaint alleges, on behalf of Plaintiff that Coastal Ridge failed to pay wages for on-call time in violation of the Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act ("MFLSA"), the Minnesota Payment of Wages Act, and Minnesota Rule 5200.0120. Plaintiff also asserts claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Melissa Muro LaMere, Esq. Ashley M. Patyk, Esq. MASLON LLP 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 2900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: (612) 672-8200 Email: melissa.murolamere@maslon.com ashley.patyk@maslon.com - and - Matthew L. Roberts, Esq. KOOPERMAN MENTEL CROSSLEY YAROSS 250 E. Town Street, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43215 Phone: (614) 344-4840 Email: mroberts@kmcylaw.com COLUMBIA DEBT RECOVERY: Saha Files TCPA Suit in M.D. Florida ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Columbia Debt Recovery LLC. The case is styled as Arko Saha, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Columbia Debt Recovery LLC doing business as: Genesis, Case No. 6:26-cv-00585-JSS-NWH (M.D. Fla., March 16, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Columbia Debt Recovery LLC doing business as Genesis -- https://www.genesiscred.com/ -- specializes in collections for the multi-family industry.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Adam A. Schwartzbaum, Esq. SCHWARTZBAUM 14 N.E. 1st Ave., Suite 705 Miami, FL 33132 Phone: (786) 453-8485 Email: adam@schwartzbaum.com - and - Joseph Michael Sternberg, Esq. 100 East Pine Street, Suite 110 Orlando, FL 32801 Phone: (407) 495-1893 Email: joseph@landersandsternberg.com CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA: Class Cert. Bid in Moore Suit Due July 20 -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ROBERT MOORE and FRANK R. FEREZA, JR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL COMPANY LLC, Case No. 2:23-cv-01991-WSS (W.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge William S. Stickman IV entered an order granting joint motion for extension of time: 1. Affirmative Expert Reports due by: May 1, 2026 2. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by: June 1, 2026 3. Expert Discovery shall close on: July 3, 2026 4. Motion for Class Certification due by: July 20, 2026 5. Brief in Opposition due by: August 21, 2026 6. Reply Brief due by: September 11, 2026 The Defendant explores and produces natural oil and gas. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=KFW970 at no extra charge.[CC] COSTCO WHOLESALE: Ortiz Seeks Refund of Unlawful IEEPA Tariffs -------------------------------------------------------------- GUILLERMO J. ORTIZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant, Case No. 3:26-cv-01164 (D.P.R., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violation of State Consumer Fraud Statutes and quasi contract/unjust enrichment. The case arises from Costco's retention of windfall profits generated by the unlawful tariffs imposed by the Trump Administration under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. According to the complaint, the windfall is a direct result of Costco systematically passing on the costs of IEEPA tariffs to its own customers, including Puerto Rico members. The Plaintiff seeks a judgment that Costco is obligated to return to him and proposed Class members all IEEPA duties passed on to customers in the form of higher prices on products, with interest. Costco Wholesale Corporation is an American multinational corporation based in Issaquah, Washington. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Julian R. Rivera-Aspinall, Esq. RIVERA-ASPINALL, GARRIGA & FERNANDINI, PSC 1647 Adams St., Summit Hills San Juan, PR 00920 Telephone: (787) 792-8644 Email: aspinall@ragflaw.com - and - Francisco E. Colon-Ramirez, Esq. COLON RAMIREZ LLC P.O. Box 361920 San Juan, PR 00936 Telephone: (888) 223-2364 Facsimile: (787) 425-4731 Email: fecolon@colonramirez.com - and - Luis Martinez Llorens, Esq. LUIS MARTINEZ-LLORENS LAW OFFICES, PSC VIG Tower 1225 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Suite 1406 San Juan, PR 00907 Telephone: (787) 725-1012 Facsimile: (787) 725-1082 Email: lmartinez@lmlawpr.com COUNTRY CLUB: Class Cert Bid Filing in Tiwari Due July 15 --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as PRIYESH TIWARI, v. COUNTRY CLUB CENTER/HOMES, LLC, Case No. 2:25-cv-01490-MHW-KAJ (S.D. Ohio), the Hon. Judge Jolson entered a scheduling order as follows: -- Any motion to amend the pleadings or to join additional parties shall be filed by June 15, 2026. The parties agree that the motion for class certification shall be filed by July 15, 2026. -- Consistent with the parties' request, the Court intends to allow 90 days to conduct post-certification discovery, after a decision on the conditional class certification question. The parties are warned, however, that they will need to be diligent once the discovery period begins. -- The Plaintiff will make a settlement demand by 30 days after receiving time and pay data for the entire lookback period. -- The parties are ordered to submit a proposed schedule within ten days of the Court's decision on the Plaintiff's motion for class and collective certification. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant failed to pay him and other similarly situated employees for overtime hours worked, specifically: (1) lunch breaks that were automatically deducted from hours worked despite employees not actually receiving a bona fide break; and (2) uncompensated pre- and post shift work, when employees received reports of ongoing patient care from the previous shift and gave the same reports to the succeeding shift. Plaintiff alleges this failure to pay violated the FLSA overtime rules, and the Ohio Prompt Pay Act. The Defendant is a residential care facility. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=9OFmYJ at no extra charge.[CC] DANAHER CORP: Class Cert Bid Filing in Hawkins Suit Due April 17 ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as BRENDA HAWKINS, and DEREK EINERSEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. DANAHER CORPORATION, RAINER M. BLAIR, MATT MCGREW, and EMMANUEL LIGNER, Case No. 1:23-cv-02055-AHA (D.D.C.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order granting joint motion for extension of class certification deadlines: Deadline The Plaintiffs shall make their expert April 17, 2026 supporting class certification available for deposition on a mutually agreeable date no later than: The Defendants shall file any opposition to April 17, 2026 class certification and shall serve any expert report(s) opposing class certification by: The Defendants shall make any such expert(s) May 18, 2026 opposing class certification available for deposition on a mutually agreeable date no later than: The Plaintiffs shall file any reply May 27, 2026 supporting class certification and shall serve any rebuttal report(s) in support of class certification by: Danaher is an American healthcare company. A copy of the Parties' motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=KJO3ac at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Jeremy A. Lieberman, Esq. Justin D. D'Aloia, Esq. POMERANTZ LLP 600 Third Avenue New York, NY 10016 Telephone: (212) 661-1100 Facsimile: (212) 661-8665 E-mail: jalieberman@pomlaw.com jdaloia@pomlaw.com - and - Daniel S. Sommers, Esq. Jan E. Messerschmidt, Esq. COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 1100 New York Ave., NW Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699 E-mail: dsommers@cohenmilstein.com jmesserschmidt@cohenmilstein.com - and - Brian Schall, Esq. Rina Restaino, Esq. THE SCHALL LAW FIRM 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (424) 303-1964 Facsimile: (213) 519-5876 E-mail: brian@schallfirm.com rina@schallfirm.com The Defendants are represented by: Brian M. Lutz, Esq. Jason Mendro, Esq. Lissa M. Percopo, Esq. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 393-8200 Facsimile: (415) 393-8306 E-mail: BLutz@gibsondunn.com JMendro@gibsondunn.com LPercopo@gibsondunn.com DANAHER CORPORATION: Nadeau Sues for Racial, Gender Discrimination ------------------------------------------------------------------ MICHAEL NADEAU, WAYNE GAGNE, and PATRICK FARRELL, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. DANAHER CORPORATION, PALL CORPORATION, BECKMAN COULTER, INC., GLOBAL LIFE SCIENCES SOLUTIONS USA LLC d/b/a CYTIVA, and AB SCIEX LLC d/b/a SCIEX, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-00923 (D.D.C., March 16, 2026) alleges Defendants' violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Massachusetts Fair Employment Practices Act, the New Hampshire Law Against Discrimination, and the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. Named Plaintiffs, white men, allege they have been discriminated against based on race in violation of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981 and sex in violation of Title VII. Named Plaintiffs further allege that Defendants' policies and practices constitute intentional disparate treatment under Title VII, and that Defendants' race-based practices also violate Sec. 1981. The complaint alleges that Danaher implemented a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Policy that is discriminatory against Plaintiffs and the putative Classes. As a direct result of the DEI Policy, qualified white applicants who are not members of Defendants preferred "underrepresented" groups, including Plaintiffs, have been systematically denied interviews and selection for positions because Defendants elevated race and sex as criteria in the screening and interview-selection process. Danaher's DEI Policy has permeated all aspects of employment at Danaher and its wholly owned subsidiaries, and as a result, applicants for employment that are not women or People of Color have been subjected to unlawful discrimination. Named Plaintiffs, on behalf of the putative Classes of aggrieved applicants, bring this action to hold Danaher accountable for unlawful discrimination, says the suit. Danaher Corporation is an American Fortune 200 company. It operates globally, primarily in the life sciences, diagnostics and biotechnology sectors.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: George G. Triantis, Esq. MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. 201 N. Franklin Street, Suite 700 Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: (813) 577-4761 Facsimile: (813) 559-4870 E-mail: gtriantis@forthepeople.com DEBTHELP INC: Salaiz Files Suit in Tex. Dist. Ct. ------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against DebtHelp, Inc. The case is styled as Erik Salaiz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. DebtHelp, Inc., Case No. 2026DCV1417 (Tex. Dist. Ct., El Paso Cty., March 16, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Civil." DebtHelp -- https://www.ccdebthelp.com/ -- specializes in debt settlement, credit counseling and financial crisis management services to individuals and businesses.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brian R. Rodriguez, Esq. 333 W Broadway, Ste. 1110 San Diego, CA 92101-3806 Phone: 619-557-7667 DONALD TRUMP: Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Bid Response ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as STEPHANIE FELL, et al., v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-04206-TSC (D.D.C.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order granting their motion for stay or extension of deadline to respond to motion for class certification. The Defendants move that this Court stay Defendants' deadline to respond to the class certification motion until after the Court decides the forthcoming dispositive motion. Alternatively, the Defendants request that their deadline to respond to the class certification motion be extended until April 6, 2026, so as to align with their deadline to respond to the Amended Complaint. On March 3, 2026, the Plaintiffs moved for class certification. Donald Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Jc7Ri1 at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Brett A. Shumate, Esq. Kian Kevin Azimpoor, Esq. Noah T. Katzen, Esq. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 305-2428 E-mail: noah.t.katzen@usdoj.gov DYNAMIC NAIL: Faces Pelaez Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website --------------------------------------------------------------- JUDITH PELAEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. DYNAMIC NAIL SUPPLY LLC, Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-00127 (N.D. Ind., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and declaratory relief. According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually impaired persons. The Defendant's website, https://dynamicnailsupply.com, contains access barriers which hinder the Plaintiff and Class members to enjoy the benefits of their online goods, content, and services offered to the public through the website. The accessibility issues on the website include but not limited to: inadequate focus order, changing of content without advance warning, unclear labels for interactive elements, lack of alt-text on graphics, inaccessible drop-down menus, the lack of navigation links, the denial of keyboard access for some interactive elements, and the requirement that transactions be performed solely with a mouse. The Plaintiff and Class members seek permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that its website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals. Dynamic Nail Supply LLC is a company that sells online goods and services in Indiana. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason B. Marshall, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (463) 777-4196 Email: jmarshall@ealg.law ELIAS J & L: Gordillo Sues Over Wage and Hour Law Violations ------------------------------------------------------------ ANA GORDILLO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ELIAS J & L CORP. d/b/a HOMESTYLE DESSERTS BAKERY, JASON ELIAS, and LAURA ELIAS TIMMONS, Defendants, Case No. 7:26-cv-01986 (S.D.N.Y., March 11, 2026) seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and to recover from Defendants her unpaid overtime wages, spread-of-hours pay, liquidated damages, statutory damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, the New York Labor Law, and the New York Wage Theft Prevention Act. Throughout her employment, the Plaintiff worked as a baker with a work schedule of between 40 to 60 hours per workweek. The Plaintiff regularly worked hours in excess of 40 per workweek. The Defendants paid Plaintiff at the applicable New York statutory minimum wage rate for all hours worked. However, they did not compensate Plaintiff or other bakery workers for hours worked over 40 per workweek at one and a half times their regular hourly wage rates, says the suit. Elias J & L Corp. is a New York corporation that owns, operates, and does business as Homestyle Desserts Bakery, a bakery located at 24 South Water Street, Peekskill, NY. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Louis Pechman, Esq. Galen C. Baynes, Esq. Rachell Henriquez, Esq. PECHMAN LAW GROUP PLLC 488 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 583-9500 E-mail: pechman@pechmanlaw.com baynes@pechmanlaw.com henriquez@pechmanlaw.com EMANUEL MEDICAL: ClassAction.org Investigates Data Breach --------------------------------------------------------- Attorneys working with ClassAction.org are looking into whether a class action lawsuit can be filed in light of the Emanuel Medical Center data breach. As part of their investigation, they need to hear from individuals who had their information exposed in the incident, including those who received notice of the Emanuel Medical Center data breach or otherwise believe they are affected. Emanuel Medical Center Security Incident: What Happened? Emanuel Medical Center has reported a data breach affecting 28,963 people, as detailed in a report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights. A notice posted to Emanuel Medical Center's website states that suspicious activity was detected on May 22, 2025. An investigation with cybersecurity experts found that an unauthorized party accessed parts of their computer systems between May 21 and 24, 2025. A data-review firm was engaged to analyze the affected files, which were found to contain sensitive information, such as names, birthdates, contact details, government ID numbers (like Social Security numbers and driver's license numbers), health insurance data, patient IDs, service dates, provider names, diagnoses, treatments, prescriptions, medical histories, and lab reports. Notification letters are being sent to those affected by the Emanuel Medical Center data breach with a current address on file. Emanuel Medical Center operates a hospital, nursing home, senior behavioral health center, and various outpatient practices in Emanuel County, Georgia. What You Can Do After the Emanuel Medical Center Data Breach If your information was exposed in the Emanuel Medical Center data breach, attorneys want to hear from you. You may be able to start a class action lawsuit to recover compensation for loss of privacy, time spent dealing with the breach, out-of-pocket costs, and more. A successful case could also force Emanuel Medical Center to ensure they take proper steps to protect the information they were entrusted with. [GN] EPISOURCE LLC: Class Cert Bid Filing Continued to July 17 --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned re Episource LLC Data Breach Litigation, Case No. 2:25-cv-05330-SB-MBK (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. entered an order granting motion to continue deadlines in the case management order. The Plaintiffs move for a 120-day extension of the case management deadlines, citing the multiple pending motions that may significantly alter the remaining claims and parties. The Defendants do not oppose the motion. The Court has ordered Plaintiffs to file a second amended consolidated class action complaint (SAC) by March 27, with challenges to the SAC to be adjudicated over the subsequent two months. Accordingly, the Court finds good cause to grant a continuance to the remaining case deadlines, including to allow the parties to complete class discovery in advance of a motion for class certification. The Court modifies the CMO as follows: Event New Dates Motion for class certification: July 17, 2026 Opposition to motion for class Aug. 14, 2026 certification: Reply brief in support of class Aug. 28, 2026 certification: Motion for Class Certification Hearing: Sept. 18, 2026 Fact Discovery Cutoff: Oct. 16, 2026 Expert Discovery Cutoff: Nov. 20, 2026 Settlement Conference Deadline: Jan. 8, 2026 Episource develops health care software solutions. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=nu2sCr at no extra charge.[CC] EVERBRIDGE INC: Sylebra Seeks to Certify Class Action ----------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as SYLEBRA CAPITAL PARTNERS MASTER FUND LTD, SYLEBRA CAPITAL PARC MASTER FUND, AND SYLEBRA CAPITAL MENLO MASTER FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. EVERBRIDGE, INC., DAVID MEREDITH, PATRICK BRICKLEY, and JAIME ELLERTSON, Case No. 2:22-cv-02249-FWS-RAO (C.D. Cal.), the Plaintiffs, on Aug. 13, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., will move the Court for an entry of an Order pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23: (i) certifying a class action; (ii) appointing Plaintiffs as Class Representatives; and (iii) appointing Lead Counsel Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP and Liaison Counsel Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as Co-Class Counsel. Everbridge is an American enterprise software company A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=loc5vH at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Michael H. Rogers, Esq. P. Canty, Esq. Nicholas Manningham, Esq. LABATON KELLER SUCHAROW LLP 140 Broadway New York, NY 10005 Telephone: (212) 907-0700 Facsimile: (212) 818-0477 E-mail: mcanty@labaton.com mrogers@labaton.com nmanningham@labaton.com - and - David J. Schwartz, Esq. SAXENA WHITE P.A. 10 Bank Street Suite 882 White Plains, NY 10606 Telephone: (914) 437-8551 Facsimile: (888) 631-3611 E-mail: dschwartz@saxenawhite.com - and - Ryan A. Llorens, Esq. Danielle S. Myers, Esq. ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 231-1058 Facsimile: (619) 231-7423 E-mail: ryanl@rgrdlaw.com dmyers@rgrdlaw.com FEDEX CORP: Collects Unauthorized IEEPA-Tariffs, Tran Suit Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------------ JARED TRAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. FEDEX CORPORATION, Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-02290-SHL-atc (W.D. Tenn., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and declaratory judgment. The case arises from the Defendant's unlawful practice of routinely charging their customers purported duties, tariffs, and related surcharges as part of the importation and delivery process. According to the complaint, the Defendant imposed and collected tariff-related charges purportedly authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) since in 2025. However, on February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States held that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs and that such tariffs were unlawful and imposed without statutory authority. As a result of that decision, the charges the Defendant imposed on the Plaintiff and Class members were unlawful, invalid, and void, suit says. FedEx Corporation is a transportation, logistics, e-commerce, and business services provider, doing business in Tennessee. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: J. Gerard Stranch, IV, Esq. Michael Tackeff, Esq. STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC The Freedom Center 223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200 Nashville, TN 37203 Telephone: (615) 254-8801 Email: gstranch@stranchlaw.com mtackeff@stranchlaw.com FEDEX CORP: Faces Ross Suit Over Unlawful IEEPA-Tariff Collection ----------------------------------------------------------------- KEVIN ROSS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. FEDEX CORPORATION, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-02227 (S.D.N.Y., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and declaratory judgment. The case arises from the Defendant's unlawful practice of routinely charging their customers purported duties, tariffs, and related surcharges as part of the importation and delivery process. According to the complaint, the Defendant imposed and collected tariff-related charges purportedly authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) since in 2025. However, on February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States held that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs and that such tariffs were unlawful and imposed without statutory authority. As a result of that decision, the charges the Defendant imposed on the Plaintiff and Class members were unlawful, invalid, and void, suit says. FedEx Corporation is a transportation, logistics, e-commerce, and business services provider, doing business in New York. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael R. Reese, Esq. Carlos F. Ramirez, Esq. REESE LLP 100 West 93rd Street, 16th Floor New York, NY 10025 Telephone: (212) 643-0500 Facsimile: (212) 253-4272 Email: mreese@reesellp.com cramirez@reesellp.com FIFTH THIRD BANK: Bid for Class Cert. in Howards Due Dec. 21 ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Troy Howards, v. Fifth Third Bank, Case No. 1:18-cv-00869-MRB (S.D. Ohio), the Hon. Judge Barrett entered an amended calendar order: 1. The Plaintiffs to Confirm All Fields of Transactional Data Sought on Additional Plaintiffs: March 13, 2026 2. Complete Production of Additional Plaintiff Class Representative Account Data: April 13, 2026 3. File Amended Complaint: May 21, 2026 4. Completion of Additional Plaintiff Specific Discovery: Sept. 24, 2026 (This deadline is contingent on timely served discovery responses and production of documents and mutually agreeable deposition). 5. Deadline for the Plaintiff to serve amended/supplemental class certification expert report: Sept. 24, 2026 6. Deadline for the Defendant to serve amended/supplemental class certification expert report: Nov. 20, 2026 7. Deadline for the Defendant to present the Defendant's expert for deposition: Dec. 11, 2026 8. Deadline for the Plaintiff's motion for class certification: Dec. 21, 2026 9. Deadline for the Defendant's response to motion for class certification: Feb. 4, 2027 10. Deadline for the Plaintiff's reply in support of motion for class certification: Feb. 25, 2027 Fifth Third is a bank holding company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=HiPty7 at no extra charge.[CC] FINWISE BANCORP: Mediation Fails in Minter Data Breach Suit ----------------------------------------------------------- Finwise Bancorp disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2026, that the parties in the Minter data breach class suit failed to engage in voluntary mediation and reach agreement on March 17, 2026. Between July and August 2025, several lawsuits were filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The complaints generally assert claims of negligence, breach of implied contract and unjust enrichment, on behalf of various classes of putative individuals who claimed to have been harmed in connection with an alleged data breach involving the Company. The plaintiffs are seeking equitable and injunctive relief as well as an unspecified amount of monetary damages in connection with their claims, which include an award of attorneys' fees and costs. On October 3, 2025, the Court entered an Order consolidating the pending cases and all subsequently filed putative class actions involving the same or substantially the same obligations into the pending matter into Minter et. al v. FinWise Bank et. al, Case No. 2:25-cv-00569-JNP-CMR. The Company has disputed the claims and is vigorously defending the lawsuit. The parties engaged in voluntary mediation on March 17, 2026, but were unable to reach an agreement on that date. The outcome of the pending litigation described above is uncertain. The Company intends to defend vigorously against the foregoing pending lawsuit and any other lawsuits as they may arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is inherently uncertain, and we are unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits. Finwise Bancorp is a bank holding company that operates through its subsidiary, FinWise Bank, providing banking products and services, including lending and deposit solutions, to consumers and businesses, often in partnership with fintech and other strategic partners across the United States. FISH BEAR: Clark Gambling Suit Removed to N.D. Ala. --------------------------------------------------- The class action styled SARAH CLARK, Plaintiff v. FISH BEAR STUDIO LTD, Defendant, Case No. 33-CV-2026-900027.00, was removed from the the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Alabama, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. The Clerk of Court for the Northern District of Alabama assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-00406-HNJ to the proceeding. Pursuant to the Alabama Code Section 8-1-150(a), the case seeks to recover Plaintiff's money spent to play Defendant's gambling games. Fish Bear Studio Ltd. is a Hong Kong limited company that operates in the sweepstakes casino and poker game development industry. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Forrest S. Latta, Esq. BURR & FORMAN LLP 11 N. Water Street, Suite 22200 Mobile, AL 36602 Telephone: (251) 344-5151 Facsimile: (251) 344-9696 E-mail: flatta@burr.com - and - Gerald P. Gillespy, Esq. BURR & FORMAN LLP 420 North 20th Street, Suite 3400 Birmingham, AL 35203 Telephone: (205) 251-3000 Facsimile: (205) 458-5100 E-mail: ggillespy@burr.com FLAMINGO PLAZA: Brito Sues Over Facilities' ADA Non-Compliance -------------------------------------------------------------- CARLOS BRITO, Plaintiff, v. FLAMINGO PLAZA, LLC and PRODUCTOS DE NICARAGUA INC, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-21583-XXXX (S.D. Fla., March 11, 2026) is a class action seeking for injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and costs pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff has encountered architectural barriers that are in violation of the ADA at the subject commercial property and businesses located within the commercial property. The barriers to access at the commercial property, and businesses within, have each denied or diminished Plaintiff's ability to visit the commercial property and have endangered his safety in violation of the ADA. Flamingo Plaza, LLC owns and operates a commercial shopping plaza located in Hialeah, FL. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alfredo Garcia-Menocal, Esq. GARCIA-MENOCAL, P.L. 350 Sevilla Avenue, Suite 200 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Telephone: (305) 553-3464 E-mail: aquezada@lawgmp.com yabdalla@lawgmp.com - and - Ramon J. Diego, Esq. THE LAW OFFICE OF RAMON J. DIEGO, P.A. 5001 SW 74th Court, Suite 103 Miami, FL, 33155 Telephone: (305) 350-3103 E-mail: rdiego@lawgmp.com ramon@rjdiegolaw.com aquezada@lawgmp.com yabdalla@lawgmp.com. FOOTWEAR UNLIMITED: Bennett Suit Removed to W.D. Wash. ------------------------------------------------------ The case styled MALIKA BENNETT, on her own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FOOTWEAR UNLIMITED, INC., Defendant, Case No. 26-2-05019-8 SEA, was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of King, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on March 11, 2026. The Clerk of Court for Western District of Washington assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-00822 to the proceeding. The case arises from Defendant's alleged violations of Washington's Commercial Electronic Mail Act and Washington's Consumer Protection Act in connection with Defendant's alleged transmission of commercial emails featuring subject lines which employ various tactics to create a false sense of urgency in consumers' minds. Footwear Unlimited, Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes footwear. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Todd T. Williams, Esq. Joseph M. Kingerski, Esq. CORR CRONIN LLP 1015 Second Avenue, Floor 10 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone: (206) 625-8600 Facsimile: (206) 625-0900 E-mail: twilliams@corrcronin.com jkingerski@corrcronin.com - and - Lukas Sosnicki, Esq. Dominic Biffignani, Esq. THOMPSON COBURN LLP 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 282-2500 E-mail: lsosnicki@thompsoncoburn.com dbiffignani@thompsoncoburn.com FORT LAUDERDALE, FL: Court Dismisses Jackson Suit ------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JAYANNA JACKSON, et. al., v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, et al., Case No. 0:24-cv-60935-RS (S.D. Fla.), the Hon. Judge Smith entered an order that: 1. The Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted: a. The Plaintiffs' 1983 claims against the City in Counts II, IV, V, and VII are dismissed. b. The Plaintiffs' 1983 claims against the supervising officers in Counts I and III are dismissed. c. Count VI is dismissed. 2. Corrected Plaintiffs' motion for class certification, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law is denied. The Plaintiffs argue that they have met each element. As to the first element, Plaintiffs argue that their allegation that freedom of speech and the right to peacefully assemble in a public forum are fundamental components of the liberty safeguarded by the Due Process Clause to the U.S. Constitution is sufficient. As to the second element, the Plaintiffs argue that the process utilized by the Defendants to suppress the Plaintiffs' assembly and speech were unconstitutional. Moreover, Plaintiffs argue that the Constitution required Defendants to issue a dispersal order before resorting to force. However, even assuming arguendo that the Plaintiffs have adequately plead these elements, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to adequately plead the third element: that there was an inadequate state remedy. The Plaintiffs seek to certify two classes. The two proposed class are those present in a defined location in downtown Fort Lauderdale, on May 31, 2020, and subjected to deployment of less-lethal force by FLPD, or unlawful dispersal order. The Damages Class is defined as: "Those persons present at or near SE 2nd Street and SE 1st Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida on May 31, 2020, between 6:50 p.m. and 8:00 p.m., who were subjected to FLPD's crowd dispersal tactics." The Damages Class includes two subclasses: 1) those subject to less-lethal force; and 2) those who were not subject to less lethal force but were driven from the area as a result of FLPD dispersal tactics. The proposed Injunctive Relief Class is defined as: "All persons present at or near SE 2nd Street and SE 1st Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida on May 31, 2020, between 6:50 p.m. and 8:00 p.m., or may in the future, participate in, or be present at, demonstrations within the City in the exercise of their rights of free speech, assembly, and petition in general, and particularly as related to protesting police violence and discrimination against people of color, especially Black Americans." For the reasons stated below, both the Damages Class and the Injunctive Relief Class are not apt to produce common answers that drive the resolution of Plaintiffs’ claims. Consequently, class certification is denied. The Plaintiffs bring claims under § 1983 against the City for First Amendment violations under Counts II and IV and Fourteenth Amendment violations under Counts V and VII. The Plaintiffs raise three theories of liability under Monell: (1) final policy maker; (2) policy, custom, or practice; and (3) failure to train. Fort Lauderdale is a city on Florida's southeastern coast, known for its beaches and boating canals. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=rF7CBK at no extra charge.[CC] FREEDOM SOLAR PROS: Campbell Suit Removed to C.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as David Campbell, an individual; on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and the general public v. FREEDOM SOLAR PROS, LLC, a limited liability company; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Case No. 25STCV38562 was removed from the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, to the United States District Court for the Central District of California on March 16, 2026, and assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-02792. The Plaintiff's Complaint asserts 7 causes of action for: violation of Business and Professions Code Section 17200, et seq.; failure to pay proper wages and overtime compensation in violation of Labor Code Sections 204, 510, 1194 and 1198; failure to pay all wages at the time of separation in violation of Labor Code Sections 200, et seq.; failure to provide itemized wage statements in violation of Labor Code Section 226; failure to provide compliant meal and rest periods in violation of Labor Code Sections 226.7 and 512; failure to provide compliant meal periods in violation of Labor Code Section 226.7; failure to provide compliant rest periods in violation of Labor Code Section 226.7; and failure to reimburse business expenses in violation of Labor Code Section 2802.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Jordan C. Lee, Esq. Sarah Y. Oh, Esq. POLSINELLI LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2900 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: 310-556-1801 Facsimile: 310-556-1802 Email: jclee@polsinelli.com soh@polsinelli.com GAYTAN & PINEDA: Ramos Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Gaytan & Pineda Insurance Agency, LLC. The case is styled as Ingrid Lizbeth Alcala Ramos, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Gaytan & Pineda Insurance Agency, LLC, Case No. 26CV176298 (Cal. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty., March 16, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case." Gaytan and Pineda Insurance Agency LLC -- https://www.gaytaninsuranceagency.com/ -- is a reputable insurance agency based in Turlock, California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jose M. Herrera, Esq. Matthew Haulk, Esq. HAULK & HERRERA LLP, 100 Pine St., Ste. 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111-5235 Phone: 415-745-3219 Fax: 415-745-3301 Email: jherrera@hhemploymentlaw.com mhaulk@hhemploymentlaw.com GOLDMAN SACHS: 4th Cir. Affirms Denial of Arbitration Bid in Brown ------------------------------------------------------------------ In the case, GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, d/b/a Marcus by Goldman Sachs, Appellant, v. RHEA ANN BROWN; GREGORY KEVIN MAZE, Appellees. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEYS; NATIONAL CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY RIGHTS CENTER, Amici Supporting Appellee, Case No. 25-1439 (4th Cir.), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Goldman Sachs' motion to compel arbitration. The Fourth Circuit addressed a conflict between resolving a dispute through arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and resolving it in bankruptcy court under the Bankruptcy Code. The case involved an adversary proceeding based on an alleged violation of the automatic stay under Section 362(a). Two debtors sued Goldman Sachs under Section 362(k), claiming it continued collecting credit card debt after they filed for bankruptcy. Brown filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in June 2023, and Maze filed for Chapter 7 in November 2023, both listing credit card debt owed to Goldman Sachs. The Bankruptcy Noticing Center notified Goldman Sachs of the automatic stay, but despite this, Goldman Sachs continued attempting to collect the debt, including telling them their accounts could be reported as charged off to credit bureaus. Brown alleged that Goldman Sachs continued contacting her by email, mail, and phone for over six months, despite being told that its collection efforts violated the automatic stay. Maze made similar claims, saying Goldman Sachs contacted him for more than three months. During a Feb. 15, 2024 call, when Maze provided his attorney's contact information, the representative responded that it was not her job to contact his counsel and that it was his job to pay his bills. Brown and Maze filed an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court, alleging Goldman Sachs wilfully violated the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. Section 362(a)(3) and (6). They claimed similar violations in other cases and sought injunctive relief, damages, and attorneys' fees under Sections 362(k) and 105. They also purported to represent a class pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7023, consisting of "all individuals in the United States who currently are in a consumer bankruptcy case or were formerly in a consumer bankruptcy case from whom Goldman Sachs made a post-petition demand for pre-petition debt." Goldman Sachs moved to compel arbitration based on the arbitration clause in the credit card agreements and asked to stay the bankruptcy proceedings. The bankruptcy court denied Goldman Sachs' motion to compel arbitration and stayed the case, finding the adversary proceeding was a core bankruptcy matter tied directly to the Bankruptcy Code. It held that the automatic stay is a key debtor protection and that sending the claims to arbitration would conflict with the Code's purposes. The court also noted that bankruptcy courts are best suited to handle these broader issues in a unified way. On appeal, the district court affirmed, agreeing that arbitration would conflict with the Bankruptcy Code by interfering with the bankruptcy court's authority to enforce the automatic stay and to serve as a centralized forum for resolving the dispute. Goldman Sachs argued that the Plaintiffs agreed to arbitrate all claims under their credit card contracts and that the FAA required enforcement, even for a Section 362(k) claim, asserting there was no conflict with the Bankruptcy Code. It also claimed arbitration would not disrupt the bankruptcy process and that the courts wrongly favored the bankruptcy forum. The Plaintiffs countered that their Section 362(k) claim was a core bankruptcy issue and that arbitration would conflict with the automatic stay and the Bankruptcy Code's "fresh start" purpose. They maintained that the bankruptcy court properly denied arbitration to preserve uniform enforcement of bankruptcy laws. The Fourth Circuit found a tension between enforcing arbitration and resolving the dispute in bankruptcy court and said the analysis begins with Goldman Sachs' motion to compel arbitration. It noted several conflicts between arbitration and adjudicating a Section 362(k) claim, including undermining the bankruptcy court's role, reducing uniformity, limiting bankruptcy expertise, and weakening the protections and deterrent purposes of the automatic stay. These factors, along with legislative history, supported the conclusion that arbitration would conflict with the Bankruptcy Code and justified the district court's decision to keep the case in bankruptcy court. The Appellate Court also emphasized that bankruptcy presents a unique statutory and constitutional context, and the Supreme Court has not ruled that arbitration must override bankruptcy claims. Overall, while the Court has favored arbitration in other contexts, bankruptcy stands apart and may justify a different result. For these reasons, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's March 17, 2025, order denying Goldman Sachs' motion to compel arbitration. Judge Robert Bruce King dissented, arguing the majority wrongly refused to compel arbitration of the Plaintiffs' Section 362 claims, including their putative class action. Relying on Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon and Moses v. CashCall, Inc., he said the claims fall within the arbitration agreements and should be resolved through arbitration, not bankruptcy court. He also noted the majority created a split with the Second Circuit's decision in MBNA v. Hill, which found no conflict with arbitration. He would have reversed and ordered arbitration, including for the class claims, and thus dissented. A full-text copy of the Court's March 18, 2026 Opinion is available at https://tinyurl.com/nvf4n8xp ARGUED: Roman Martinez -- roman.martinez@lw.com -- LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Theodore Ohmstede Bartholow III, KELLETT & BARTHOLOW, PLLC, Dallas, Texas, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Jeff G. Hammel -- jeff.hammel@lw.com -- Christopher Harris -- christopher.harris@lw.com -- Jason Hegt, New York, New York, Uriel Hinberg, LATHAM & WATKINS LLP, Washington, D.C.; David G. Browne, SPIRO & BROWNE, PLC, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellant. Karen L. Kellett, KELLET & BARTHOLOW, PLLC, Dallas, Texas; Malissa L. Giles -- mgiles@gileslambert.com -- Tracy A. Giles -- tgiles@gileslambert.com -- GILES & LAMBERT PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Edward C. Boltz, Allan L. Gropper, THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN T. ORCUTT, P.C., Durham, North Carolina, for Amici Curiae. H MART LOS ANGELES: Xocol Sues Over Failure to Pay Compensation --------------------------------------------------------------- Manuel David Xocol, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. H MART LOS ANGELES, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART BALBOA, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART BUENA PARK, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART CHINO, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART DE ANZA, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART DUBLIN, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART ECC, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART GARDEN GROVE, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART IRVINE NORTHPARK LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART IRVINE WESTPARK LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART IRVINE, INC., a California corporation; H MART KTOWN PLAZA, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART LAKEWOOD LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART NORWALK, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART SACRAMENTO, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART SAN DIEGO, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART SAN FRANCISCO, LLC, a California limited liability company, H MART SAN JOSE, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART TORRANCE, LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART WEST, INC., a California corporation; H MART WESTMINSTER LLC, a California limited liability company; H MART, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES I through 100, inclusive, Case No. 26STCV08690 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., March 17, 2026), is brought against the Defendant for violations of the California Labor Code as a result of the Defendants failure to pay proper compensation. The Plaintiff alleges, based on information and belief, that Defendants knew, or should have known, that Plaintiff and Aggrieved Employees are entitled to receive wages for all time worked, including regular, overtime, and double times wages, and that Plaintiff and Aggrieved Employees were not receiving all wages owed for work that was required to be performed. The Plaintiff alleges, based on information and belief, that Defendants had and have a policy or practice of requiring Plaintiff and other Aggrieved Employees to work more than 8 hours per day, 40 hours per week, and/or 7 straight workdays in a workweek (in violation of Labor Code sections 551 and 552) without paying them proper overtime wages when such hours are worked, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendants as a non-exempt employee. H MART LOS ANGELES is, and at all times relevant hereto was, a limited liability company organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Molly DeSario, Esq. Laurel N. Holmes, Esq. BIBIYAN LAW GROUP, P.C. 1460 Westwood Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90024 Phone: (310) 438-5555 Fax: (310) 300-1705 Email: mdesario@tomorrowlaw.com Laurel@tomorrowlaw.com HATEM BROTHERS: Faces Saenz Suit Over Property's Access Barriers ---------------------------------------------------------------- CARLOS SAENZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. HATEM BROTHERS INC. D/B/A HURRICANE GRILL & WINGS OF KENDALL, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-21793 (S.D. Fla., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act. According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its facilities to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other persons with disabilities. The Defendant has continued to discriminate against people who are disabled in ways that block them from access and use of its property and business. The Plaintiff and similarly situated disabled individuals encountered architectural barriers in common areas such entrance access and path of travel and public restrooms. The Plaintiff and Class members seek injunctive relief to remove the existing architectural barriers to the physically disabled when such removal is readily achievable for the place of public accommodation. Hatem Brothers Inc., doing business as Hurricane Grill & Wings of Kendall, is a commercial property owner and operator based in Florida. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony J. Perez, Esq. ANTHONY J. PEREZ LAW GROUP, PLLC 7950 W. Flagler Street, Suite 104 Miami, FL 33144 Telephone: (786) 361-9909 Facsimile: (786) 687-0445 Email: ajp@ajperezlawgroup.com HERTZ GLOBAL: Doller Seeks to Certify Class ------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as EDWARD M. DOLLER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC., STEPHEN M. SCHERR, AND ALEXANDRA BROOKS, Case No. 2:24-cv-00513-KCD-DNF (M.D. Fla.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order certifying a class action, certifying the Class, appointing Lead Plaintiff Robert Stephens as the class representative, and appointing Lead Plaintiff's choice of counsel, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, as class counsel. Lead Plaintiff seeks certification of the following Class: "All persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired common stock of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., between Jan. 6, 2023 and April 24, 2024, inclusive, and were injured thereby." The initial complaint in this action was filed on May 31, 2024. On Aug. 14, 2024, this Court issued an Order appointing Robert Stephens as Lead Plaintiff. On Sept. 30, 2024, Lead Plaintiff filed the Amended Class Action Complaint alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Hertz is a worldwide vehicle rental company. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=MqFZ88 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Shannon Hopkins, Esq. LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP 1111 Summer Street, Suite 403 Stamford, CT 06905 Telephone: (212) 992-4523 E-mail: shopkins@zlk.com - and - Cullin Avram O'Brien, Esq. CULLIN O'BRIEN LAW, P.A. 6541 NE 21st Way Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33308 Telephone: (561) 676-6370 E-mail: cullin@cullinobrienlaw.com HESS BAKKEN: Allowed Leave to File Docs Under Seal -------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Ronald Penman and Adelante Oil & Gas, LLC, on behalf of themselves and a Class of similarly situated royalty owners, v. Hess Bakken Investments II, LLC, Case No. 1:22-cv-00097-DLH-CRH (D.N.D.), the Hon. Judge Daniel Hovland entered an order granting motion for leave to file under seal: The Court has carefully reviewed Hess's proposed redactions. The proposed redactions are limited, reasonable, and narrowly tailored so as to keep only the most sensitive information from public view. The personally sensitive information that has been redacted is irrelevant to the pending motion. The commercially sensitive information which has been redacted has been kept to a reasonable minimum. The Court approves of the proposed redactions. The Defendant is an oil and gas producer. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=fhHvuW at no extra charge.[CC] HIGH QUALITY RESTORATION: Boddy Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. ----------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against High Quality Restoration, LLC. The case is styled as Steven Boddy, Ayham Bsharat, on behalf of themselves, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly-situated v. High Quality Restoration, LLC, High Quality Restoration of NY, LLC, Ryan Pyles individually, Case No. E2026006542 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Monroe Cty., March 16, 2026). The nature of suit stated as Other Commercial (Employment). High Quality Restoration -- https://hqrdry.com/ -- is a reputable restoration company located in Rochester, New York.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Andrew Collin Weiss, Esq. BORRELLI & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 910 Franklin Ave, Suite 205 Garden City, NY 11530 HUMANA INC: Bland Files TCPA Suit in M.D. Pennsylvania ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Humana, Inc. The case is styled as Kelly Bland, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Humana, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-00659-KM (M.D. Pa., March 16, 2026). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Humana, Inc. -- https://www.humana.com/ -- is an American for-profit health insurance company based in Louisville, Kentucky.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Andrew Roman Perrong, Esq. PERRONG LAW LLC 2657 Mt. Carmel Ave. Glenside, PA 19038 Phone: (215) 225-5529 Email: a@perronglaw.com ILLINOIS: Denial of Class Certification Bid in Boyce v. Cox Upheld ------------------------------------------------------------------ In the case, ANTHONY BOYCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASHLEY COX and FRANCIS CATINO, Defendants-Appellees, Case No. 24-1796 (7th Cir.), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed in part and affirmed in part the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendants. Boyce, an inmate at Western Illinois Correctional Center, filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 without a lawyer. He claimed that the prison dentist, Dr. Francis Catino, and dental assistant Ashley Cox were deliberately indifferent to his dental needs, violating his Eighth Amendment rights. On appeal, Boyce argues the district court made a mistake by granting summary judgment to the Defendants, saying he failed to exhaust the prison’s required administrative grievance process under 42 U.S.C. Section 1997e(a). Boyce experienced severe tooth pain and sought care. In July 2022, Dr. Trusewych found cavities, swollen gums, abscesses, and bleeding, then referred him to dental staff. Dr. Catino confirmed a hole in his tooth but declined Boyce's requests for fillings, a specialist, and a cleaning, saying cleanings were unavailable and scheduling an extraction instead. Dental assistant Cox also told Boyce the prison did not provide cleanings or mouthwash. He was given antibiotics and told he would be scheduled for fillings. As an inmate, Boyce had to follow Illinois' grievance process, which required filing a grievance within about 60 days, followed by review by a grievance officer, then the Chief Administrative Officer, with further appeal to the Administrative Review Board and a final decision by the Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections. On Sept. 20, 2022, Boyce filed a grievance about severe tooth pain and ongoing lack of care, referencing his July 2022 exam with Dr. Catino, who found a hole in his tooth and said an extraction was needed. Boyce again requested fillings, a specialist, and a cleaning. On Sept. 26, 2022, Dr. Catino and Ashley Cox repeated that Western did not provide cleanings, and the extraction was rescheduled after Boyce said he felt unwell. In November 2022, the grievance was reviewed, deemed moot because of the rescheduled extraction, and later denied on appeal by the Director on Jan. 30, 2023. A few months later, Boyce filed a pro se Section 1983 lawsuit alleging deliberate indifference and sought class certification. The district court found he stated an Eighth Amendment claim but denied class certification and later granted summary judgment for failure to exhaust under the PLRA. On appeal, Boyce challenged the exhaustion ruling and denial of class certification. The Defendants argued his grievance only covered events before Sept. 26, 2022. Boyce responded that his grievance addressed ongoing denial of care and cited Turley v. Rednour, 729 F.3d 645, 649 (7th Cir. 2013). The Seventh Circuit agreed with Boyce, finding his grievance covered a continuing issue and gave sufficient notice to prison officials. It also rejected the argument that he had to name Cox specifically, finding the grievance contained enough detail to identify her. On class certification, the Court held Boyce could not adequately represent a class because he proceeded pro se and did not show he had the ability or resources to protect the interests of other inmates. For these reasons, the Appellate Court held Boyce exhausted his administrative remedies, affirmed the denial of class certification, reversed the summary judgment ruling, and remanded the case. A full-text copy of the Court's March 17, 2026 Opinion is available at https://tinyurl.com/yz7tnbct INCORPORATED VILLAGE: Ortiz Seeks Update on Discovery Schedule -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Holubnyczyj-Ortiz v. Incorporated Village of Floral Park et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-07828-SJB-ST (E.D.N.Y.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order granting motion for updated discovery schedule: 1. Fact Discovery to be completed by June 15, 2026; 2. Expert Reports to be exchanged by July 15, 2026; 3. Expert depositions to be completed by August 15, 2026; 4. All discovery to be completed by September 15, 2026; and 5. Final date to take first step in dispositive motion practice is October 15, 2026. This is Defendants' third request for such an extension. Floral Park is a village located in Nassau County, New York. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=kIzlpF at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Lauren Casparie, Esq. MORRIS DUFFY ALONSO FALEY & PITCOFF 101 Greenwich Street, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10006 Telephone: (212) 766-1888 Facsimile: (212) 766-3252 JBS LIVE: Force Seeks to File Oversized Brief --------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Force v. JBS Live Pork LLC, Case No. 3:25-cv-03018 (C.D. Ill., Filed Jan. 22, 2025), the Hon. Judge Sue E. Myerscough entered an order granting the Unopposed Motion for Leave to File an Oversized Brief in Support of their Motion for Class Certification. The length of the opening brief shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages. The length of the opposition brief shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages. The length of the reply brief shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages. The nature of suit states Labor Litigation. JBS specializes in the merchandising of live pork. [CC] KAPLAN NORTH: Fails to Protect Clients' Info, Remsen Suit Alleges ----------------------------------------------------------------- MOOREA REMSEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. KAPLAN NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 0:26-cv-60790-RS (S.D. Fla., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for negligence, breach of implied contract, invasion of privacy, and unjust enrichment. The case arises from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals stored within its network systems following a data breach between October 30, 2025, and November 18, 2025. The Defendant also failed to timely notify the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals about the data breach. As a result, the private information of the Plaintiff and Class members was compromised and damaged through access by and disclosure to unknown and unauthorized third parties, says the suit. Kaplan North America, LLC is a provider of comprehensive test preparation, professional licensing, and educational services, with its principal place of business located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Tonyia J. Johnson, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, PA 14 NE 1st Ave., Suite 705 Miami, FL 33132 Telephone: (305) 479-2299 Email: tjohnson@shamisgentile.com KASA LIVING: Hotel Rooms Inaccessible to Disabled, Niles Says ------------------------------------------------------------- CHRISTOPHER NILES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. KASA LIVING, INC., Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-00425 (W.D. Pa., March 16, 2026) arises from the Defendant's violation of the Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff was formerly employed by the Lawrence County Jail in New Castle, Pennsylvania. As the result of an accident on March 3, 2011, he sustained a T6 complete spinal cord injury and became dependent on a wheelchair for mobility. The Plaintiff plans to visit Pittsburgh to see his son in April of 2026. During this visit, he is considering staying at one of the two Kasa hotels in Pittsburgh. He reserved a hotel room that was described as "accessible," only to learn that various material elements of the hotel were not accessible. The Defendant has engaged, directly, or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements, in illegal disability discrimination, as defined by Title III, says the suit. Kasa Living, Inc. manages and operates 75+ properties under the Kasa name.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: R. Bruce Carlson, Esq. Ian M. Brown, Esq. CARLSON BROWN 222 Broad St. PO Box 242 Sewickley, PA 15143 Telephone: (724) 730-1753 E-mail: bcarlson@carlsonbrownlaw.com ibrown@carlsonbrownlaw.com KICKS CREW: Intercepts Electronic Communications, Ramos Says ------------------------------------------------------------ PERCY RAMOS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. KICKS CREW LLC, Defendant, Case No. 4:26-cv-02272 (N.D. Cal., March 16, 2026) arises from the Defendant's violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the California Invasion of Privacy Act, and the California Constitution. This is a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of the Plaintiff and all U.S. residents who accessed and navigated Defendant's website www.kickscrew.com and whose electronic communications were intercepted or recorded by advertising technology provided by Meta Platforms, Inc., Google, LLC, and Snap, Inc. (collectively the "Third Parties"). Despite its express promises and representations of privacy, Defendant aids, agrees with, employs, or otherwise enables the Third Parties to eavesdrop on communications sent and received by Plaintiff and Class Members on the Website that Defendant owns and operates, including communications that contain personally identifiable information and purchase information. Neither Defendant nor the Third Parties procured Plaintiff's consent prior to these interceptions, nor was Plaintiff on notice of the fact that such interceptions were occurring. Such disclosures are a violation of Plaintiff's privacy and were done intentionally for targeted advertising purposes. By failing to procure consent before disclosing these communications to the Third Parties, the Defendant violated the federal and state laws, says the suit. Kicks Crew LLC is a Delaware limited liability company, headquartered in New York, New York. It owns and operates the website, an online marketplace for sneakers and apparel.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Philip L. Fraietta, Esq. BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. 50 Main Street, Suite 475 White Plains, NY 10606 Telephone: (914) 874-0710 Facsimile: (914) 206-3656 E-mail: pfraietta@bursor.com KRIGLER BEVERLY HILLS: Dodds Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Krigler Beverly Hills LLC, et al. The case is styled as Rieko Dodds, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Krigler Beverly Hills LLC, Does 1 to 50, Case No. CGC26634921 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., March 16, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Non-Exempt Complaints." Krigler -- https://krigler.com/ -- offers luxury fragrances and scented candles.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jose M. Herrera, Esq. HAULK & HERRERA LLP, 100 Pine St., Ste. 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111-5235 Phone: 415-745-3219 Fax: 415-745-3301 Email: jherrera@hhemploymentlaw.com KRISTI NOEM: EMPC Seeks to Certify Rule 23 Class Action ------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as E.M.P.C., et al., v. Kristi NOEM, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, in her official capacity, et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-21565-DSL (S.D. Fla.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order: 1. Certifying a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(1)(A), (b)(2), and (b)(3); 2. Appointing the Plaintiffs E.M.P.C., et al., as class representatives; and 3. Appointing Arno Javier Lemus of Lemus Law Group as class counsel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g). The Plaintiffs propose the following class definition: "All Cuban nationals who (1) were inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States; (2) have remained physically present in the United States for at least one year following their admission or parole; (3) have properly filed a Form I-485 Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status pursuant to the Cuban Adjustment Act with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; and (4) whose I-485 applications are currently subject to the adjudication hold imposed by Policy Alert PA-2025-26 (Nov.27, 2025), Policy Memorandum PM-602-0192 (Dec. 2, 2025), and/or Policy Memorandum PM-602-0194 (Jan. 1, 2026)." Excluded from the class are: the Defendants, their officers, agents, and employees; any member of the federal judiciary assigned to this matter; and any person whose Form I-485 application has been finally adjudicated and denied on the merits prior to the date of class certification. The proposed class satisfies every requirement of Rule 23(a) and independently qualifies for certification under Rule 23(b)(1)(A), (b)(2), and (b)(3). The named Plaintiffs and all class members share identical legal claims arising from the same categorical Policy Directives applied uniformly and without individualized review. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=NjQRuq at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Arno Javier Lemus, Esq. LEMUS LAW GROUP 1024 NW 102 PL Miami, FL 33172 Telephone: (786) 816-2795 E-mail: lemusarno@gmail.com KRISTI NOEM: Plaintiffs Allowed File Supplemental Complaint ----------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as SVITLANA DOE, et al., v. KRISTI NOEM, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-10495-IT (D. Mass.), the Hon. Judge Talwani entered an order granting the Plaintiffs leave to file a supplemental complaint that would include: "the proposed additional named Plaintiffs who claim to be affected by the issuance of the Family Reunification Program Federal Register Notice, any allegations relevant to either or both of the December 2025 actions, and Plaintiffs' proposed eighth claim for relief as it applies to the December 2025 actions only." The court also reaffirms its Order Modifying Class Definition and Appointing Additional Named Plaintiffs granting the Plaintiff's motion to modify class definition. This litigation challenges actions taken by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in early 2025 regarding humanitarian parole programs. In December 2025, after DHS issued a further policy memorandum and federal register notice impacting noncitizens who have received parole under some of these programs, Plaintiffs sought to amend their complaint, add additional Named Plaintiffs, and modify the class definition for the previously certified class. The court allowed Plaintiffs to supplement their complaint and to modify the class definition in two orders, each issued with memorandum to follow. According to the Defendants' logic, the subclass met the commonality requirement from December 29 to January 5 but no longer met that requirement once Defendants sent notice to some of the parolees. Applying this reasoning, had the court ruled on Plaintiffs’ motion before January 5, there would be no commonality issue because no one had received notice. Had the Defendants issued all notices at once, then the class would have continued to satisfy the commonality requirement after January 5. But, because Defendants chose to only send out some notices after receiving Plaintiffs’ motion, Defendants’ own actions during the pendency of the litigation would thwart commonality. On January 10, 2026, this court granted Plaintiffs’ Motion to Modify Class Definition on an emergency basis. Rather than modifying the Amended Order Granting Class Certification by amending the Early Revocation Parolee Subclass, the court added a new subclass covering: "All individuals who have received a grant of parole that is subject to the Termination of Family Reunification Parole Processes for Colombians, Cubans, Ecuadorians, Guatemalans, Haitians, Hondurans, and Salvadorans, 90 Fed. Reg. 58032 (Dec. 15, 2025), rescinding individual grants of parole on a categorical and en masse basis." A copy of the Court's memorandum dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=0BtoJj at no extra charge.[CC] KROGER CO: Kirkbride Seeks Prelim OK of Settlement Deal ------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JUDY KIRKBRIDE and BEETA LEWIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. THE KROGER CO., Case No. 2:21-cv-00022-ALM-EPD (S.D. Ohio), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e): (i) granting preliminary approval of the class action settlement agreement, inclusive of exhibits thereto; (ii) preliminarily certifying the Settlement Class; (iii) preliminarily appointing Bursor & Fisher, P.A., Arisohn LLC, and Smith Krivoshey, P.C. as Class Counsel; (iv) preliminarily appointing Judy Kirkbride and Beeta Lewis as class representatives of the Settlement Class; and (v) appointing a Settlement Administrator and Escrow Agent. The Plaintiffs allege that Kroger should have reported its discounted Rx Savings Club ("Savings Club") prices as its U&C prices for insured transactions instead of its higher "retail" prices. The "Settlement Class" is defined as: "All individuals in the United States and its territories who, at any point in time during the Settlement Class Period, paid in whole or in part for one or more prescription drugs from Kroger using their insurance." The Settlement Amount consists of a non-reversionary, all-cash "common fund" in the amount of $17,000,000. Kroger is an American retail company that operates supermarkets and multi-department stores throughout the United States. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=PHHRFP at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Scott D. Simpkins, Esq. MANSOUR GAVIN LPA North Point Tower 1001 Lakeside Ave., Suite 1400 Cleveland, OH 44114 Telephone: (216) 523-1500, ext. 129 E-mail: ssimpkins@mggmlpa.com - and - Joseph I. Marchese, Esq. Andrew J. Obergfell, Esq. BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. 1330 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Fl. New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (646) 837-7150 Facsimile: (212) 989-9163 E-Mail: jmarchese@bursor.com aobergfell@bursor.com - and - Joel D. Smith, Esq. SMITH KRIVOSHEY, P.C. 867 Boylston Street Fifth Floor, #1520 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 377-7404 E-mail: joel@skclassactions.com - and - Joshua D. Arisohn, Esq. ARISOHN LLC 94 Blakeslee Rd. Litchfield, CT 06759 Telephone: (917) 656-0569 E-mail: josh@arisohnllc.com LEVAIN BAKERY: Douglass Seeks Final OK of Settlement Deal --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as BLAIR DOUGLASS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. LEVAIN BAKERY COOKIE COMPANY, LLC, Case No. 2:25-cv-01722-MPK (W.D. Pa.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order granting motion for certification of the settlement class and final approval of the class action settlement agreement. The Defendant is a cookie company. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=b08z9M at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kevin W. Tucker, Esq. Kevin J. Abramowicz, Esq. Chandler Steiger, Esq. Stephanie Moore, Esq. Kayla Conahan, Esq. Jessica Liu, Esq. EAST END TRIAL GROUP LLC 6901 Lynn Way, Suite 503 Pittsburgh, PA 15208 Telephone: (412) 877-5220 E-mail: ktucker@eastendtrialgroup.com kabramowicz@eastendtrialgroup.com csteiger@eastendtrialgroup.com smoore@eastendtrialgroup.com kconahan@eastendtrialgroup.com jliu@eastendtrialgroup.com LEWIS DRUGS INC: Schneider Files Suit in D. South Dakota -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Lewis Drugs, Inc. The case is styled as Jacquie Schneider, Lori Reed, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Lewis Drugs, Inc., Case No. 1:26-cv-01008-ECS (D.S.C., March 13, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. Lewis Drugs, Inc. -- https://www.lewisdrug.com/ -- operates a chain of drug and pharmacy stores. The Company provides prescription and non-prescription drugs.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jonathan P. McCoy, Esq. COSTELLO PORTER HILL HEISTERKAMP BUSHNELL & CARPENTER, LLP PO Box 290 704 St. Joseph St. Rapid City, SD 57709 Phone: (605) 343-2410 Fax: (605) 343-4262 Email: jmccoy@costelloporter.com LIMITED RUN: Court OK's $2.72MM Settlement in Carbone ----------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOHN CARBONE, RYAN ADKINS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. LIMITED RUN GAMES, INC., Case No. 2:24-cv-08861-JMW (E.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Wicks entered an order granting the Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and costs and motion for final approval of the class action settlement. -- The Court finally certifies for settlement purposes only the following Settlement Class: "All persons who accessed the Limited Run Game Service in the United States and watched a pre-recorded video or purchased a video game containing a Cut Scene between Jan. 1, 2016 and the present "Limited Run Game Service" means the Limited Run Games website (www.limitedrungames.com) and all other digital platforms or applications owned or operated by Defendant where video content is available to be viewed and/or video games are available for purchase. Excluded from the Settlement Class are (1) the Judge and Magistrate Judge presiding over this Action and their immediate family members and staff members; (2) Limited Run Games, its subsidiaries, parent companies, successors, predecessors, and any entity in which the Limited Run Games has a controlling interest and their current or former officers, directors, and employees; and (3) Settlement Class Members who submit a valid Request for Exclusion prior to the Opt-Out Deadline. -- The Court grants final approval to the appointment of John Carbone and Ryan Adkins as the Settlement Class Representatives. -- The Court grants Settlement Class Representatives a Service Award in the amount of $2,500 each. -- Pursuant to Rule 23(g), the Court grants final approval to the appointment, of Adrian Gucovschi of Gucovschi Rozenshteyn, PLLC, and Mark S. Reich and Michael N. Pollack of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class; -- The Court grants the Motion and awards Class Counsel (as well as any agents, vendors or experts with which they may have worked on this matter) $906,666.67 for their fees and expenses in the case, extinguishing any claims for any such fees, costs or expenses as against the Defendant Released Parties. The Plaintiffs commenced this class action against the Defendant alleging violations of the Video Privacy Protection Act ("VPPA"). The Plaintiffs specifically allege that the Defendant caused the Plaintiffs' personally identifiable information to be sent to Facebook and other third parties without Plaintiffs' knowledge or consent. The total settlement amount is $2,720,000.00. Limited Run is an American video game distributor. A copy of the Court's memorandum and order dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=09g9SI at no extra charge.[CC] LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS: Wyrosdick Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against LWP Claims Solutions, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Linda Wyrosdick, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. LWP Claims Solutions, Inc., Does 1-10, Case No. 26CV006614 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., March 16, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case." LWP Claims Solutions -- https://lwpclaims.com/ -- is a workers' compensation third-party administrator specializing in California claims.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Seung L. Yang, Esq. THE SENTINEL FIRM, APC 355 S. Grand Ave., Suite 1450 Los Angeles, California 90071 Phone: (213) 985-1150 Fax: (213) 985-2155 Email: seung.yang@thesentinelfirm.com MEMORIAL HEART: Settlement Deal in Allen Gets Initial OK -------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Allen v. Memorial Heart Institute, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-00179 (E.D. Tenn.), the Hon. Judge Curtis Collier entered an order granting motion and preliminarily approval of settlement agreement. The Court will approve the proposed settlement notice plan and direct the settlement administrator to provide notice of the proposed settlement to the class members. The Court will confirm the Plaintiffs' Counsel as class counsel and will appoint the Plaintiffs as class representatives. The Court will hold a final approval and fairness hearing on Thursday, May 28, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time at the federal courthouse in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Balanced with a high likelihood of success on the merits, the Court finds that the costs and risks associated with trial, including multiple expensive expert witnesses, tip this factor in favor of preliminary approval. The Plaintiffs have "vigorously prosecuted these cases for the benefit of all Class Members," including taking steps like reviewing pleadings, participating in extensive discovery, and participating in depositions. The Court also finds that the named Plaintiffs have fairly and adequately protected the interests of the class, as well as fulfilled their duties throughout the litigation. They have "provided documents, reviewed pleadings, maintained contact with Class Counsel, and consulted with Class Counsel regarding the mediation and the Settlement." The settlement creates two classes: the "Total Class" and the "SSN Class." The Total Class is "All living individuals in the United States whose Private Information was identified as accessed or accessible in the Data Incident," and consists of approximately 460,000 members. The SSN Class is a subset of the Total Class and is defined as: "All living individuals in the United States who are members of the Total Class and whose Social Security number was identified as accessed or accessible during the Data Incident." This action arises from a data breach occurring between March 8, 2023, and March 16, 2023. The Defendant discovered the breach on approximately April 17, 2023. After discovering the breach, the Defendant sent notice of the breach to approximately 460,000 individuals whose private information was accessed or potentially accessed. The Defendant offers access to leading cardiac surgery techniques and cardiothoracic care across Southeast Tennessee and North Georgia. A copy of the Court's memorandum dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=bqMqq8 at no extra charge.[CC] MEMORIAL HEART: Settlement Deal in Cahill Gets Initial Nod ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as STEPHEN CAHILL, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. MEMORIAL HEART INSTITUTE, LLC d/b/a The Chattanooga Heart Institute, Case No. 1:23-cv-168 (E.D. Tenn.), the Hon. Judge Curtis Collier entered an order granting motion and preliminarily approval of settlement agreement. The Court will approve the proposed settlement notice plan and direct the settlement administrator to provide notice of the proposed settlement to the class members. The Court will confirm the Plaintiffs' Counsel as class counsel and will appoint the Plaintiffs as class representatives. The Court will hold a final approval and fairness hearing on Thursday, May 28, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time at the federal courthouse in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Balanced with a high likelihood of success on the merits, the Court finds that the costs and risks associated with trial, including multiple expensive expert witnesses, tip this factor in favor of preliminary approval. The Plaintiffs have "vigorously prosecuted these cases for the benefit of all Class Members," including taking steps like reviewing pleadings, participating in extensive discovery, and participating in depositions. The Court also finds that the named Plaintiffs have fairly and adequately protected the interests of the class, as well as fulfilled their duties throughout the litigation. They have "provided documents, reviewed pleadings, maintained contact with Class Counsel, and consulted with Class Counsel regarding the mediation and the Settlement." The settlement creates two classes: the "Total Class" and the "SSN Class." The Total Class is "All living individuals in the United States whose Private Information was identified as accessed or accessible in the Data Incident," and consists of approximately 460,000 members. The SSN Class is a subset of the Total Class and is defined as: "All living individuals in the United States who are members of the Total Class and whose Social Security number was identified as accessed or accessible during the Data Incident." This action arises from a data breach occurring between March 8, 2023, and March 16, 2023. The Defendant discovered the breach on approximately April 17, 2023. After discovering the breach, the Defendant sent notice of the breach to approximately 460,000 individuals whose private information was accessed or potentially accessed. The Defendant offers access to leading cardiac surgery techniques and cardiothoracic care across Southeast Tennessee and North Georgia. A copy of the Court's memorandum dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Clw79M at no extra charge.[CC] MEMORIAL HEART: Settlement Deal in Cordes Wins Initial OK --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Cordes v. Memorial Heart Institute, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-00178 (E.D. Tenn.), the Hon. Judge Curtis Collier entered an order granting motion and preliminarily approval of settlement agreement. The Court will approve the proposed settlement notice plan and direct the settlement administrator to provide notice of the proposed settlement to the class members. The Court will confirm the Plaintiffs' Counsel as class counsel and will appoint the Plaintiffs as class representatives. The Court will hold a final approval and fairness hearing on Thursday, May 28, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time at the federal courthouse in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Balanced with a high likelihood of success on the merits, the Court finds that the costs and risks associated with trial, including multiple expensive expert witnesses, tip this factor in favor of preliminary approval. The Plaintiffs have "vigorously prosecuted these cases for the benefit of all Class Members," including taking steps like reviewing pleadings, participating in extensive discovery, and participating in depositions. The Court also finds that the named Plaintiffs have fairly and adequately protected the interests of the class, as well as fulfilled their duties throughout the litigation. They have "provided documents, reviewed pleadings, maintained contact with Class Counsel, and consulted with Class Counsel regarding the mediation and the Settlement." The settlement creates two classes: the "Total Class" and the "SSN Class." The Total Class is "All living individuals in the United States whose Private Information was identified as accessed or accessible in the Data Incident," and consists of approximately 460,000 members. The SSN Class is a subset of the Total Class and is defined as: "All living individuals in the United States who are members of the Total Class and whose Social Security number was identified as accessed or accessible during the Data Incident." This action arises from a data breach occurring between March 8, 2023, and March 16, 2023. The Defendant discovered the breach on approximately April 17, 2023. After discovering the breach, the Defendant sent notice of the breach to approximately 460,000 individuals whose private information was accessed or potentially accessed. The Defendant offers access to leading cardiac surgery techniques and cardiothoracic care across Southeast Tennessee and North Georgia. A copy of the Court's memorandum dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=c6NFPm at no extra charge.[CC] MEMORIAL HEART: Settlement Deal in Edwards Gets Initial OK ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Edwards v. Memorial Heart Institute, LLC, d/b/a The Chattanooga Heart Institute, Case No. 1:23-cv-00172 (E.D. Tenn.), the Hon. Judge Curtis Collier entered an order granting motion and preliminarily approval of settlement agreement. The Court will approve the proposed settlement notice plan and direct the settlement administrator to provide notice of the proposed settlement to the class members. The Court will confirm the Plaintiffs' Counsel as class counsel and will appoint the Plaintiffs as class representatives. The Court will hold a final approval and fairness hearing on Thursday, May 28, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time at the federal courthouse in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Balanced with a high likelihood of success on the merits, the Court finds that the costs and risks associated with trial, including multiple expensive expert witnesses, tip this factor in favor of preliminary approval. The Plaintiffs have "vigorously prosecuted these cases for the benefit of all Class Members," including taking steps like reviewing pleadings, participating in extensive discovery, and participating in depositions. The Court also finds that the named Plaintiffs have fairly and adequately protected the interests of the class, as well as fulfilled their duties throughout the litigation. They have "provided documents, reviewed pleadings, maintained contact with Class Counsel, and consulted with Class Counsel regarding the mediation and the Settlement." The settlement creates two classes: the "Total Class" and the "SSN Class." The Total Class is "All living individuals in the United States whose Private Information was identified as accessed or accessible in the Data Incident," and consists of approximately 460,000 members. The SSN Class is a subset of the Total Class and is defined as: "All living individuals in the United States who are members of the Total Class and whose Social Security number was identified as accessed or accessible during the Data Incident." This action arises from a data breach occurring between March 8, 2023, and March 16, 2023. The Defendant discovered the breach on approximately April 17, 2023. After discovering the breach, the Defendant sent notice of the breach to approximately 460,000 individuals whose private information was accessed or potentially accessed. The Defendant offers access to leading cardiac surgery techniques and cardiothoracic care across Southeast Tennessee and North Georgia. A copy of the Court's memorandum dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=9bdVtI at no extra charge.[CC] MEMORIAL HEART: Settlement Deal in Jackson Gets Prelim Nod ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Jackson v. Memorial Heart Institute, LLC, d/b/a The Chattanooga Heart Institute, Case No. 1:23-cv-00174 (E.D. Tenn.), the Hon. Judge Curtis Collier entered an order granting motion and preliminarily approval of settlement agreement. The Court will approve the proposed settlement notice plan and direct the settlement administrator to provide notice of the proposed settlement to the class members. The Court will confirm the Plaintiffs' Counsel as class counsel and will appoint the Plaintiffs as class representatives. The Court will hold a final approval and fairness hearing on Thursday, May 28, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time at the federal courthouse in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Balanced with a high likelihood of success on the merits, the Court finds that the costs and risks associated with trial, including multiple expensive expert witnesses, tip this factor in favor of preliminary approval. The Plaintiffs have "vigorously prosecuted these cases for the benefit of all Class Members," including taking steps like reviewing pleadings, participating in extensive discovery, and participating in depositions. The Court also finds that the named Plaintiffs have fairly and adequately protected the interests of the class, as well as fulfilled their duties throughout the litigation. They have "provided documents, reviewed pleadings, maintained contact with Class Counsel, and consulted with Class Counsel regarding the mediation and the Settlement." The settlement creates two classes: the "Total Class" and the "SSN Class." The Total Class is "All living individuals in the United States whose Private Information was identified as accessed or accessible in the Data Incident," and consists of approximately 460,000 members. The SSN Class is a subset of the Total Class and is defined as: "All living individuals in the United States who are members of the Total Class and whose Social Security number was identified as accessed or accessible during the Data Incident." This action arises from a data breach occurring between March 8, 2023, and March 16, 2023. The Defendant discovered the breach on approximately April 17, 2023. After discovering the breach, the Defendant sent notice of the breach to approximately 460,000 individuals whose private information was accessed or potentially accessed. The Defendant offers access to leading cardiac surgery techniques and cardiothoracic care across Southeast Tennessee and North Georgia. A copy of the Court's memorandum dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=yDgyI5 at no extra charge.[CC] META PLATFORMS: Filing for Class Cert. Bid in Gershzon Due June 26 ------------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as MIKHAIL GERSHZON, ANACLETO DELEON, and JEFFREY DIETRICH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. META PLATFORMS, INC., Case No. 3:23-cv-00083-SI (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Illston entered an order extending briefing deadlines and class certification hearing: Event Deadline Reply in Support of Motion for Class April 17, 2026 Certification, Rebuttal Class Expert Reports, Opposition to Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Expert, and Motion(s) to Exclude Meta's Experts: Reply in Support of Motion to May 22, 2026 Exclude Plaintiffs’ Expert, Opposition to Motion(s) to Exclude Meta's Experts: Hearing on Motion for Class June 26, 2026 Certification and Motions to Exclude Experts: Close of Fact Discovery: July 24, 2026 Meta is an American multinational technology company. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=DDdvc4 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Melissa Gardner, Esq. Michael W. Sobol, Esq. David T. Rudolph, Esq. John D. Maher, Esq. Linnea D. Pittman, Esq. LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 E-mail: msobol@lchb.com drudolph@lchb.com mgardner@lchb.com jmaher@lchb.com lpittman@lchb.com - and - Joseph Henry (Hank) Bates, III, Esq. Allen Carney, Esq. Courtney E. Ross, Esq. Connor Thompson, Esq. CARNEY BATES & PULLIAM, PLLC One Allied Drive, Suite 1400 Little Rock, AR 72202 Telephone: (501) 312-8500 Facsimile: (501) 312-8505 E-mail: hbates@cbplaw.com acarney@cbplaw.com cross@cbplaw.com cthompson@cbplaw.com The Defendant is represented by: Lauren R. Goldman, Esq. Darcy C. Harris, Esq. Elizabeth K. Mccloskey, Esq. Abigail A. Barrera, Esq. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 Telephone: (212) 351-4000 Facsimile: (212) 351-4035 E-mail: lgoldman@gibsondunn.com dharris@gibsondunn.com emccloskey@gibsondunn.com abarrera@gibsondunn.com - and - Melanie Marilyn Blunschi, Esq. Kristin I Sheffield-Whitehead, Esq. Catherine Anne Rizzoni, Esq. Dianne Kim, Esq. Marissa Alter-Nelson, Esq. LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 E-mail: melanie.blunschi@lw.com kristin.whitehead@lw.com cat.rizzoni@lw.com dianne.kim@lw.com marissa.alter-nelson@lw.com META PLATFORMS: Gershzon Seeks Extension of Briefing Deadlines -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as MIKHAIL GERSHZON, ANACLETO DELEON, and JEFFREY DIETRICH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. META PLATFORMS, INC., Case No. 3:23-cv-00083-SI (N.D. Cal.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order extending briefing deadlines and class certification hearing as follows: Event Deadline Reply in Support of Motion for Class April 17, 2026 Certification, Rebuttal Class Expert Reports, Opposition to Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Expert, and Motion(s) to Exclude Meta's Experts: Reply in Support of Motion to May 22, 2026 Exclude Plaintiffs’ Expert, Opposition to Motion(s) to Exclude Meta's Experts: Hearing on Motion for Class June 26, 2026 Certification and Motions to Exclude Experts: Close of Fact Discovery: July 24, 2026 Meta is an American multinational technology company. A copy of the Parties' motion dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=uKHB28 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Melissa Gardner, Esq. Michael W. Sobol, Esq. David T. Rudolph, Esq. Melissa Gardner, Esq. John D. Maher, Esq. Linnea D. Pittman, Esq. LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 E-mail: msobol@lchb.com drudolph@lchb.com mgardner@lchb.com jmaher@lchb.com lpittman@lchb.com - and - Joseph Henry (Hank) Bates, III, Esq. Allen Carney, Esq. Courtney E. Ross, Esq. Connor Thompson, Esq. CARNEY BATES & PULLIAM, PLLC One Allied Drive, Suite 1400 Little Rock, AR 72202 Telephone: (501) 312-8500 Facsimile: (501) 312-8505 E-mail: hbates@cbplaw.com acarney@cbplaw.com cross@cbplaw.com cthompson@cbplaw.com The Defendant is represented by: Lauren R. Goldman, Esq. Darcy C. Harris, Esq. Elizabeth K. Mccloskey, Esq. Abigail A. Barrera, Esq. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 Telephone: (212) 351-4000 Facsimile: (212) 351-4035 E-mail: lgoldman@gibsondunn.com dharris@gibsondunn.com emccloskey@gibsondunn.com abarrera@gibsondunn.com - and - Melanie Marilyn Blunschi, Esq. Kristin I Sheffield-Whitehead, Esq. Catherine Anne Rizzoni, Esq. Dianne Kim, Esq. Marissa Alter-Nelson, Esq. LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 E-mail: melanie.blunschi@lw.com kristin.whitehead@lw.com cat.rizzoni@lw.com dianne.kim@lw.com marissa.alter-nelson@lw.com METAL-MATIC LLC: Bailey Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime ------------------------------------------------------- Ryan Bailey, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. METAL-MATIC, LLC, a limited liability company, Case No. 0:26-cv-01910-LMP-ECW (D. Minn., March 17, 2026), is brought to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorney's fees, costs, and other relief as appropriate under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). Throughout Plaintiff's employment with Defendant, Defendant failed to properly calculate Plaintiff's shift differential pay, retention bonus pay, and other remuneration in the regular rate for proper overtime calculation. Throughout Plaintiff's employment with Defendant, he and Defendant's Hourly Employees earned shift differential pay, retention bonus pay, and other remuneration. As non-exempt employees, Defendant's Hourly Employees were entitled to full compensation for all overtime hours worked at a rate of 1.5 times their "regular rate" of pay. Throughout Plaintiff's employment with Defendant, Defendant failed to properly calculate Plaintiff's shift differential pay, retention bonus pay, and other non-discretionary remuneration into the regular rate for proper overtime calculation, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a non-exempt, Hourly Employee with the job title of Material Handler from August 12, 2025, through January 8, 2026. The Defendant is in the business of manufacturing welded and drawn-over-mandrel carbon steel tubing.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jacob R. Rusch, Esq. JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC 444 Cedar Street, Ste. 1800 St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (612) 436-1800 Email: jrusch@johnsonbecker.com - and - Jason J. Thompson, Esq. SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. One Town Square, 17th Floor Southfield, MI 48076 Phone: (248) 415-3206 Email: jthompson@sommerspc.com MICROGENICS CORP: Scheduling Order in Warrick Suit Entered ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Steele-Warrick v. Microgenics Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-06558 (E.D.N.Y., Filed Nov. 20, 2019), the Hon. Judge Frederic Block entered a scheduling order as follows: -- Counsel may modify their agreed upon briefing schedule without court approval. -- Counsel shall file a letter notifying the Court of their modified agreed upon briefing schedule. -- Counsel shall follow J. Block's motion rules, specifically section 2(D) when filing their motions By Aug. 21, 2026, the plaintiff shall file their fully briefed motion for class certification and defendants Microgenics Corp. and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. shall file their fully briefed motion for summary judgment. The nature of suit states Torts -- Personal Injury -- Product Liability. Microgenics specializes in manufacturing and supplying clinical diagnostic products and toxicology testing solutions to federal agencies.[CC] MOBIS NORTH: Chavis Files Suit Over FLSA Violation -------------------------------------------------- BERT CHAVIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MOBIS NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-10900-MAG-EAS (E.D. Mich., March 18, 2026) is a collective action complaint against the Defendant to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorney's fees, costs, and other relief as appropriate under the Fair Labor Standards Act. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a non-exempt, Hourly Employee with the job title of material handler at Defendant's Highland Park, Michigan location. Throughout Plaintiff's employment with Defendant, he and Defendant's Hourly Employees earned shift differential pay and other non-discretionary remuneration. As non-exempt employees, Defendant's Hourly Employees were entitled to full compensation for all overtime hours worked at a rate of 1.5 times their "regular rate" of pay. However, throughout Plaintiff's employment with Defendant, Defendant failed to properly calculate Plaintiff's shift differential pay and other non-discretionary remuneration into the regular rate for proper overtime calculation, says the complaint. As a result of Defendant's willful failure to compensate Plaintiff and the putative collective members at a rate not less than 1.5 times the regular rate of pay for work performed in excess of 40 hours in a workweek, Defendant violated and continues to violate the FLSA. The Plaintiff and all others similarly situated are entitled to back pay, liquidated damages, interest, attorney's fees and costs, and other relief as appropriate under the statute, says the suit. Plaintiff Bert Chavis is an adult resident of Westland, Michigan and was employed by Defendant from approximately September 2016 to November 2024. Defendant Mobis North America, LLC manufactures the three core modules required for vehicle assembly, plus separate driver safety and convenience group components.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kevin J. Stoops, Esq. SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. One Towne Square, 17th Floor Southfield, MI 48076 Telephone: (248) 355-0300 MONSANTO COMPANY: Carlisle Sues Over Harmful Roundup Herbicide -------------------------------------------------------------- WAYNE CARLISLE, Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N26C-03-230 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 11, 2026), is a class action seeking for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Monsanto's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup. The Plaintiff maintains that Monsanto's glyphosate-containing Roundup-branded products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce. In addition, Plaintiff also alleges that Monsanto lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with use of Roundup. As a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup, Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Monsanto Company is a multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation based in St. Louis, MO. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Collins Sues Over Hazardous Roundup Herbicide --------------------------------------------------------------- RAYMOND COLLINS, JR., Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N26C-03-248 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 11, 2026), is a class action seeking for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Monsanto's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup. The Plaintiff maintains that Monsanto's glyphosate-containing Roundup-branded products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce. In addition, Plaintiff also alleges that Monsanto lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with use of Roundup. As a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup, Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, says the suit. Monsanto Company is a multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation headquartered in St. Louis, MO. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Combest Sues Over Defective Roundup Herbicide --------------------------------------------------------------- FRANCES COMBEST, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N26C-03-222 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 11, 2026) is a class action seeking for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Monsanto's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup. The Plaintiff maintains that Monsanto's glyphosate-containing Roundup-branded products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce. In addition, Plaintiff also alleges that Monsanto lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with use of Roundup. As a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup, Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Monsanto Company is a multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation based in St. Louis, MO. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Coyle Sues Over Unsafe Roundup Herbicide ---------------------------------------------------------- JOSEPH COYLE, Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N26C-03-233 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 11, 2026), is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup. The Plaintiff maintains that Monsanto's glyphosate-containing Roundup-branded products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce. In addition, the Plaintiff also alleges that Monsanto lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with use of Roundup. As a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup, Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, says the suit. Monsanto Company is a multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation based in St. Louis, MO. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Evans Sues Over Roundup's Health Hazards ---------------------------------------------------------- WILMALEAN EVANS, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N26C-03-225 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 11, 2026) is a class action arising from Defendants' negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup. The Plaintiff maintains that Monsanto's glyphosate-containing Roundup-branded products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce. In addition, Plaintiff also alleges that Monsanto lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with use of Roundup. As a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup, Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, says the suit. Monsanto Company is a multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation headquartered in St. Louis, MO. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Faulkner Sues Over Harmful Roundup Herbicide -------------------------------------------------------------- DONALD FAULKNER, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N26C-03-229 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 11, 2026) is a class action arising from Defendants' negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup. The Plaintiff maintains that Monsanto's glyphosate-containing Roundup-branded products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce. In addition, the Plaintiff also alleges that Monsanto lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with use of Roundup. As a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup, Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, says the suit. Monsanto Company is a multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation headquartered in St. Louis, MO. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Ivey Sues Over Roundup's Health Hazards --------------------------------------------------------- KAREN IVEY, on behalf of the estate of SHARON IVEY, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N26C-03-241 MON (Del. Super., March 11, 2026) seeks for damages for injuries sustained by Sharon Ivey's exposure to herbicide Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate. According to the complaint, Plaintiff Karen Ivey now maintains that Monsanto's glyphosate-containing Roundup-branded products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce. In addition, the Plaintiff alleges that Monsanto lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with use of Roundup. As a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup, Plaintiff Sharon Ivey developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Plaintiff Karen Ivey asserts claims for negligence, strict products liability-design defect, strict products liability-failure to warn, breach of implied warranties, for breach of consumer protection, unfair and/or deceptive trade practices statutes, and for wrongful death. Monsanto Company is a multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation based in St. Louis, MO. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Kalpas Sues Over Negligent Herbicide Distribution ------------------------------------------------------------------- Anne Kalpas, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N26C-03-295 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 13, 2026), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Little Sues Over Wrongful Advertising & Sale -------------------------------------------------------------- Allyson Little, on behalf of the estate of Alva Blake, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N26C-03-299 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 13, 2026), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff Allyson Little is a natural person and is the Representative of Alva Blake, deceased, who developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Llamas Sues Over Negligent Advertising & Sale --------------------------------------------------------------- Jesus Llamas, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N26C-03-256 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 11, 2026), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Sierra Sues Over Negligent Herbicide Sale ----------------------------------------------------------- Yamila Sierra, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N26C-03-254 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 11, 2026), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Smith-Dixon Sues Over Negligent Distribution -------------------------------------------------------------- Ambee Smith-Dixon, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N26C-03-273 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 12, 2026), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Wisley Sues Over Wrongful Sale of Herbicide ------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Wisley, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N26C-03-297 MON (Del. Super. Ct., March 13, 2026), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com NATIONAL RIFLE: Dell'Aquila Seeks to Certify Two Classes -------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as DAVID DELL'AQUILA, LORANNDA BORJA, TODD CHESNEY, and BRENT WEBER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, Case No. 3:19-cv-00679 (M.D. Tenn.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order: 1. Certifying the proposed National Rifle Association of America ("NRA") Class and NRA Foundation Class pursuant to Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(b)(3); NRA Class: "All persons residing in the United States who donated funds to the National Rifle Association of America from Nov. 30, 2015 through Jan. 26, 2019." NRA Foundation Class: "All persons residing in the United States who donated funds to the NRA Foundation from November 30, 2015 through January 26, 2019." 2. Appointing the Named Plaintiffs as Class Representatives; and 3. Appointing the Plaintiffs' counsel as Class Counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g). The action arises from the Defendants' alleged misuse and diversion of charitable donations made by millions of individuals across the United States to the NRA and the NRA Foundation. The Plaintiffs allege that Defendants solicited donations by representing that contributed funds would be used to advance the organizations' stated missions and would be managed in accordance with applicable laws governing nonprofit organizations. Based on these allegations, the Plaintiffs have alleged claims for fraud, breach of contract, tortious interference, violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), and RICO conspiracy. The Defendant is a gun rights advocacy group based in the United States. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=naJLeS at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael I. Kanovitz, Esq. Jonathan I. Loevy, Esq. Thomas M. Hanson, Esq. Julia Rickert, Esq. Heather Sticht, Esq. Elizabeth Wang, Esq. Jordan Poole, Esq. LOEVY & LOEVY 311 N. Aberdeen St., 3rd Fl. Chicago, IL 60607 Telephone: (312) 243-5900 E-mail: hanson@loevy.com elizabethw@loevy.com NATIONAL RURAL: Mullins Wins Bid for Class Certification -------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOHN MULLINS, and THOMAS SUNDERLIN, individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the 401(k) Pension Plan, v. NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-00994-MSN-IDD (E.D. Va.), the Hon. Judge Michael Nachmanoff entered an order granting the Plaintiff's motion for class certification. In light of the Fourth Circuit's opinion in Trauernicht v. Genworth Financial Inc., Case No. 24-1880 (4th Cir. Mar. 10, 2026), the Plaintiff shall have twenty-one days from the date of this Order to submit supplemental briefing addressing the viability of class certification following Trauernicht, including any basis for class certification under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3). The Court further entered an order that any opposition and reply briefs shall be submitted in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7(F) and all summary judgment deadlines are stayed pending the resolution of class certification. National Rural is the trade association representing over 900 local electric cooperatives. A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=KnSgIQ at no extra charge.[CC] NATIONAL TENANT: Review of Order Certifying Class Action Sought --------------------------------------------------------------- The Defendants in the case captioned as VANESSA CLERMONT, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff-Respondent v. NATIONAL TENANT NETWORK, INC.; and LCIJ, INC., Defendants-Petitioners, pending with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Case No. 2:23-cv-03545-MCA-LDW, seeks to review and vacate the district court's January 23, 2026 Order certifying a class of individuals alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. National Tenant Network, Inc. provides resident screening services. The Company offers tenant performance, credit reports, criminal history, and other related services. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Andrew S. Turkish, Esq. CLAUSEN MILLER, P.C. 100 Campus Drive Florham Park, NJ 07932 Telephone: (973) 410-4130 Email: aturkish@clausen.com - and - Catherine Basque Weiler, Esq. HINSHAW & CULBERTSON, LLP 151 North Franklin, Suite 2500 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 704-3000 Email: cweiler@hinshawlaw.com NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS: Barrientes Sues Over Data Breach --------------------------------------------------------- Rochelle Barrientes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS, INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-00910 (W.D. Wash., March 17, 2026), is brought on behalf of all persons who entrusted Defendant with sensitive Personally Identifiable Information ("PII") and Protected Health Information ("PHI") (collectively, "Private Information") that was impacted in a data breach (the "Data Breach" or the "Breach"). On January 23, 2026, Defendant discovered suspicious activity related to its IT Network. In response, Defendant launched an investigation to confirm the nature and scope of the Data Breach. The Defendant's investigation determined that an unauthorized actor accessed and potentially acquired certain information between December 22, 2025, and January 15, 2026.4 The Defendant's investigation determined that the following types of Private Information were compromised as a result of the Data Breach: name, date of birth, Social Security number, phone number, email address, and health plan information for impacted individuals. The Defendant failed to take precautions designed to keep individuals' Private Information secure. The Defendant owed Plaintiff and Class Members a duty to take all reasonable and necessary measures to keep the Private Information collected safe and secure from unauthorized access. Defendant solicited, collected, used, and derived a benefit from the Private Information, yet breached its duty by failing to implement or maintain adequate security practices, says the complaint. The Plaintiff and Class Members were required to give their sensitive and confidential Private Information to Defendant. The Defendant is a Washington-based third-party administrator of employee benefits.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kaleigh N. Boyd, Esq. MCNAUL EBEL PLLC One Union Square 600 University Street, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 389-9332 Email: kboyd@mcnaul.com - and - Leanna A. Loginov, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, P.A. 14 NE 1st Ave, Suite 705 Miami, FL 33132 Phone: (305) 479-2299 Email: lloginov@shamisgentile.com NESTLE HEALTHCARE: Court Dismisses Horti Class Suit --------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Horti et al v. Nestle Healthcare Nutrition, Inc., Case No. 3:21-cv-09812-JSC (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley entered an order that: 1. The Plaintiffs' pending motion for class certification is denied as moot; 2. All other existing dates and deadlines are vacated; 3. The Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice as to their individual claims and without prejudice as to any future claims brought by other members of the putative class; and 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate and close this matter. Nestle manufactures, markets and/or distributes more than 2 drugs in the United States. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=RIWk4N at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Trenton R. Kashima, Esq. Nick Suciu III, Esq. J. Hunter Bryson, Esq. MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN PLLC 402 West Broadway, Suite 1760 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 810-7047 E-mail: tkashima@milberg.com nsuciu@milberg.com hbryson@milberg.com - and - Laurence D. King, Esq. Matthew B. George, Esq. Blair E. Reed, Esq. Clarissa Olivares, Esq. Joel B. Strauss, Esq. KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1560 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (415) 772-4700 Facsimile: (415) 772-4707 E-mail: lking@kaplanfox.com mgeorge@kaplanfox.com breed@kaplanfox.com colivares@kaplanfox.com jstrauss@kaplanfox.com - and - Michael D. Braun, Esq. KUZYK LAW, LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: 213-401-4100 E-mail: mdb@kuzykclassactions.com - and - Ross B. Rothenberg, Esq. THE ROTHENBERG LAW FIRM LLP 450 7th Avenue, 44th Floor New York, NY 10123 Telephone: (212) 563-0100 E-mail: ross@injurylawyer.com The Defendant is represented by: Timothy W. Loose, Esq. Christopher Chorba, Esq. Perlette M. Jura, Esq. Al Kelly, Esq. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: (213) 229-7746 E-mail: TLoose@gibsondunn.com CChorba@gibsondunn.com PJura@gibsondunn.com AKelly@gibsondunn.com NEW LOOK COSMETICS: Guerrero Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against New Look Cosmetics, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Jesus Guerrero, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. New Look Cosmetics, Inc., Case No. 26STCV08514 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., March 16, 2026). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." New Look Cosmetics (NLC) -- https://newlookcosmetics.com/ -- is a full service color cosmetics and skincare manufacturer.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Seung L. Yang, Esq. THE SENTINEL FIRM, APC 355 S. Grand Ave., Suite 1450 Los Angeles, California 90071 Phone: (213) 985-1150 Fax: (213) 985-2155 Email: seung.yang@thesentinelfirm.com NOVOLEX SHIELDS: Coulter Suit Removed to E.D. Washington -------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Dylan Coulter, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. NOVOLEX SHIELDS, LLC; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Case No. 26-2-00467-39 was removed from the Superior Court for the State of Washington in and for Yakima County, to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington on March 16, 2026, and assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-03048. The Complaint further asserts that Plaintiff and putative class members have brought this State Court Action to recover alleged unpaid wages, exemplary damages, interest, and attorneys' fees and costs. The Plaintiff alleges that Novolex has failed to ensure that employees received rest periods, meal periods, appropriate minimum wages for all hours worked, overtime wages, paid-sick leave, and wages due at termination, amongst other claims. The Plaintiff asserts three claims for relief including failure to compensate for noncompliant meal and rest periods in violation of RCW 49.12 and WAC 296-126-092; failure to pay minimum wages in violation of RCW 49.46; and failure to pay overtime wages in violation of RCW 49.46.130.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Adam G. Cuff, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 5150 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-693-7057 Facsimile: 206-693-7058 Email: adam.cuff@ogletree.com NTT DATA: Parties Seek Extension of Briefing Deadlines ------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as KIA ROBINSON and ALEXIS KELLER LAMONDE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. NTT DATA SERVICES, LLC and TRANSACTION APPLICATIONS GROUP, INC., Case No. 4:25-cv-01076-ALM (E.D. Tex.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order granting their joint motion for extension of briefing deadlines on the Plaintiffs' motion for Court-authorized notice. The Parties accordingly request that the Court enter an Order extending the Defendants' response deadline by 45 days, making the Defendants' response to the Notice Motion due by April 20, 2026, and extending the Plaintiffs' reply deadline by 7 days, making the Plaintiffs' reply in support of the Notice Motion due by May 4, 2026. Given the complexity of the issues raised in the Notice Motion and the volume of evidence attached to the same, the Defendants seek additional time to investigate and respond to the Plaintiffs' notice motion. On Oct. 2, 2025, the Plaintiffs Kia Robinson and Alexis Keller-Lamonde filed their collective and class action complaint and jury demand, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act. NTT provides IT services. A copy of the Parties' motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=hoq5rQ at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Kevin J. Stoops, Esq. Kathryn E. Milz, Esq. SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. One Towne Square, 17th Floor Southfield, MI 48076 Telephone: (248) 355-0300 E-mail: kstoops@sommerspc.com kmilz@sommerspc.com The Defendants are represented by: Nicole S. LeFave, Esq. Christian A. Angotti, Esq. Chloe H. Moreno, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400 Austin, TX 78701 Telephone: (512) 982-7250 Facsimile: (512) 982-7248 E-mail: nlefave@littler.com cangotti@littler.com cmoreno@littler.com NUCOR CORPORATION: Class Settlement in Sweat Suit Gets Initial Nod ------------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as MICHAEL SWEAT, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. NUCOR CORPORATION, Case No. 3:25-cv-00478-MOC-SCR (W.D.N.C.), the Hon. Judge Cogburn Jr. entered an order granting the Plaintiff's motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement as follows: 1. The Settlement provides for a Settlement Class defined as follows: "All individuals to whom Nucor sent notice relating to the Data Incident and the recipients' personal information." Excluded from the Settlement Class are all those persons who timely and validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class, as well as: (i) officers and directors of Nucor and/or the Related Entities and (ii) the members of the judiciary who have presided or are presiding over this matter and their families and staff. 2. For purposes of settlement only, and pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 23, the Court provisionally certifies the Settlement Class. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 23 and related state authority, the Court finds that giving notice is justified. 3. For the purposes of settlement only, the Court finds that Class Representative Michael Sweat will likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and should be appointed as Settlement Class Representative. Additionally, for purposes of settlement only, the Court finds that Scott Edward Cole of Cole & Van Note will likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and should be appointed as Class Counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g)(1). 4. A Final Approval Hearing shall be held on July 6, 2026, at 10 a.m Nucor produces steel and related products. A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=i2a2TH at no extra charge.[CC] NUTRIEN AG: Conspires to Raise Fertilizers' Prices, Rumbold Says ---------------------------------------------------------------- MICHAEL RUMBOLD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.; CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS; KOCH AGRONOMIC SERVICES, LLC; YARA INTERNATIONAL ASA; YARA NORTH AMERICA, INC.; THE MOSAIC CO.; and CANPOTEX LTD, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-03051 (N.D. Ill., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for violation of Sections 1 and 3 of the Sherman Act. The case arises from the Defendants' alleged conspiracies to fix, raise, maintain, and/or stabilize prices for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (NPK) fertilizers. According to the complaint, the prices of these fertilizers increased dramatically throughout 2021 and 2022 as a result of the Defendants' conspiracies. The Plaintiff and Class members paid more for NPK fertilizers than they otherwise would have and thus suffered antitrust injury and damages due to the Defendants' anticompetitive conduct, suit says. Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nutrien Ltd., with its principal place of business in Loveland, Colorado. CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is an ammonia producer, with its principal place of business in Northbrook, Illinois. Koch Agronomic Services, LLC is a fertilizer producer, with its principal place of business in Wichita, Kansas. Yara International ASA is a fertilizer producer, with its principal place of business in Oslo, Norway. Yara North America, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Yara International ASA, with its principal place of business in Tampa, Florida. The Mosaic Company is a fertilizer producer, with its principal place of business in Tampa, Florida. Canpotex Ltd. is a wholly owned company by Mosaic and Nutrien, headquartered in Saskatoon, Canada. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gary M. Klinger, Esq. MILBERG PLLC 227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2100 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (866) 252-0878 Email: gklinger@milberg.com - and - Linda P. Nussbaum, Esq. NUSSBAUM LAW GROUP, PC 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 325 Garden City, NY 11530 Telephone: (917) 438-9189 Email: lnussbaum@nussbaumpc.com - and - James E. Cecchi, Esq. Zachary Jacobs, Esq. CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, BRODY & AGNELLO, PC 5 Becker Farm Road Roseland, NJ 07068 Telephone: (973) 994-1700 Email: jcecchi@carellabyrne.com zjacobs@carellabyrne.com - and - Michael E. Criden, Esq. Lindsey C. Grossman, Esq. CRIDEN & LOVE, PA 2020 Salzedo Street, Suite 302 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Telephone: (305) 357-9000 Email: mcriden@cridenlove.com lgrossman@cridenlove.com OCHSNER CLINIC: Taylor Seeks to Certify Rule 23 Class Action ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as KELLY TAYLOR, V. OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION d/b/a OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER and DR. ANDREW MATTHEWS, Case No. 2:24-cv-01872-JCZ-DPC (E.D. La.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order certifying a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. In the alternative, the Plaintiff asks that the Court conduct a status conference and issue a scheduling order governing discovery for establishing class certification. Ochsner is a non-profit, academic, multi-specialty healthcare system. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=mxQlzG at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony D. Irpino, Esq. J. Reed Poole, Jr., Esq. Dustin L. Poche, Esq. IRPINO AVIN & HAWKINS 2216 Magazine Street New Orleans, LA 70130 Telephone: (504) 525-1500 Facsimile: (504) 525-1501 E-mail: airpino@irpinolaw.com rpoole@irpinolaw.com dpoche@irpinolaw.com OGORGEOUS INC: Beikirch Sues Over Unlawful Hidden Fees ------------------------------------------------------ Madison Beikirch and Crystle Caigoy, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. OGORGEOUS INC., a Texas corporation, and REDO TECH, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. 8:26-cv-00597 (C.D. Cal., March 17, 2026), is brought asserting claims in violations of the Unfair Competition Law, California Business & Professions Code ("UCL"); the False Advertising Law ("FAL"); the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA"); New York's General Business Law ("GBL"); Utah's Consumer Sales Practices Act ("CSPA"), and for unjust enrichment as a result of the Defendants' unlawful hidden fees. To allay customer concerns that items ordered from the Popflex website may not fit, Popflex offers free returns and purportedly unlimited exchanges. However, unbeknownst to customers like Plaintiffs, consumers actually pay for these "free" returns and exchanges through a hidden fee. Specifically, Popflex automatically includes a fee of $2.18 for "Checkout+ Unlimited Returns or Exchanges" ("Checkout+") in every order. Instead of offering customers the option to opt-in to Checkout+ at their discretion, Defendants manipulate customers into purchasing it. They do this by surreptitiously adding the fee to every purchase and then using various manipulative tactics to hide it from consumers and make them believe it is required rather than optional. Further, Checkout+ is a junk fee; it provides little to no value to customers because Popflex already allows for returns and exchanges so long as customers pay for the shipping. Nonetheless, Popflex presents Checkout+ in a way that makes customers believe they cannot return or exchange items if they remove it (assuming they even realize it is removeable and can figure out how to remove it, both unlikely given the way the fee is presented on Popflex's checkout screens). The Defendants' practices are deceptive and unlawful, says the complaint. The Plaintiff has paid for Checkout+ on at least two of her Popflex orders. oGorgeous Inc. ("Popflex") sells activewear on the internet through its website popflexactive.com.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raphael Janove, Esq. JANOVE PLLC 115 Broadway, 5th Fl. New York, NY 10006 Phone: (646) 347-3940 Email: raphael@janove.law - and - Liana Vitale, Esq. JANOVE PLLC 979 Osos St., Ste A5 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 505-9550 Email: liana@janove.law PALAMERICAN SECURITY: Rigazio Suit Removed to N.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Anthony Rigazio and Lourine Moore, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. PALAMERICAN SECURITY INC.; PALAMERICAN SECURITY (Bay Area) INC.; PALAMERICAN SECURITY (California) INC.; and PALAMERICAN SECURITY (Silicon Valley) INC., Case No. 29CV486462 was removed from the Superior Court of California County of Santa Clara, to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on March 16, 2026, and assigned Case No. 5:26-cv-02292. The nature of the alleged violations under the California Labor Code, the California Business and Professional Code, the Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: John E. McOsker, Esq. BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2942 Phone: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 Email: jmcosker@bwslaw.com PBT BANCORP: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Voltaire Suit Due Oct. 14 ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as VOLTAIRE VISITACION, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. PBT Bancorp, Case No. 6:26-cv-00057-SCM (E.D. Ky.), the Hon. Judge Meredith entered an order that the following schedule is adopted for resolution of this matter: 1) No later than April 13, 2026, the parties must exchange the information required by Rule 26(a)(1). 2) No later than Oct. 2, 2026, the Plaintiff must disclose the identity of expert witnesses who may be used at trial and written reports by the expert witnesses as required by Rule 26(a)(2). 3) All discovery necessary for the Plaintiff's motion for class certification shall be completed by Sept. 14, 2026 (with discovery requests served in a manner calculated for responses compliant with this deadline). 4) All other fact and expert discovery shall be completed by Dec. 31, 2026 (with discovery requests served in a manner calculated for responses compliant with this deadline). 5) The Plaintiff's motion for class certification must be filed no later than Oct. 14, 2026. The parties must file all dispositive motions and Daubert motions no later than March 12, 2027. 6) The pre-trial conference will be held on Sept. 27, 2027, at 1:30 p.m. at the United States Courthouse in London, Kentucky. The Defendant is a bank in the state of Kentucky. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=JtJxlf at no extra charge.[CC] PINK DOOR INC: Harris Suit Removed to N.D. California ----------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Joannah Harris, an individual, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. THE PINK DOOR, INC., a Washington corporation, Case No. CV2600245 was removed from the Superior Court of California, County of Humboldt, to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on March 16, 2026, and assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-02279. The Complaint asserts discrimination claims under state and federal law on behalf of the Plaintiff and all other similarly situated current and former customers of The Pink Door. Specifically, the Plaintiff alleges that The Pink Door's website is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), California's Unruh Civil Rights Act ("Unruh Act"), and California's Disabled Persons Act ("CDPA").[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Bryan L. Hawkins, Esq. Robert Sarkisian, Esq. STOEL RIVES LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 916.447.0700 Facsimile: 916.447.4781 Email: bryan.hawkins@stoel.com robert.sarkisian@stoel.com PLANET LABS: Mediation Hearing Set for May 7 -------------------------------------------- Planet Labs PBC disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for the fiscal period ending January 31, 2026, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2026, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware set the mediation hearing for a fiduciary class suit on May 7, 2026. A stockholder class action was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware on Aug. 19, 2024, against the former officers and directors of dMY IV and the Company. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants breached various fiduciary duties to the dMY IV stockholders and that the Company aided and abetted such breaches. The case is brought on behalf of a purported class of holders of dMY IV Class A common stock who held such stock prior to the redemption deadline for the Business Combination, did not exercise the right to redeem their shares, and were allegedly injured. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on Nov. 12, 2024. On Jan. 6, 2025, the parties submitted a stipulation dismissing all claims against the Company, which the Court granted on Jan. 8, 2025. The stockholder filed an amended complaint on Jan. 10, 2025, which reasserts the claims against the former officers and directors for breach of fiduciary duty. On Sept. 29, 2025, the Court denied a motion to dismiss the claims against the individual defendants. The parties are exploring mediation, with a mediation hearing scheduled for May 7, 2026. Those claims remain pending and, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company remains obligated to indemnify the former officers and directors for such claims. While the ultimate resolution of this matter is uncertain, the Company recorded an accrual for this matter reflected within accrued and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as of Jan. 31, 2026. In addition, the Company disclosed that on Nov. 14, 2025, the former shareholders of a company acquired by the Company in a prior period filed a demand for arbitration against the Company, alleging, among other things, breach of the underlying acquisition agreement. The parties are currently engaged in settlement negotiations in an effort to resolve the dispute prior to the commencement of formal arbitration proceedings. While the Company intends to defend itself vigorously should a settlement not be reached, the ultimate resolution of this matter remains uncertain, and the Company recorded an accrual for this matter reflected within accrued and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Planet Labs PBC is a leading provider of daily data and insights about Earth, offering high-frequency satellite imaging and analytics solutions to customers across government, commercial, and nonprofit sectors. PLANNED PARENTHOOD: Hinton Seeks Courtroom Sealing on Hearing ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as SHIRLEY HINTON and HEATHER SHIPLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., Case No. 3:23-cv-04529-JD (N.D. Cal.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order sealing the courtroom for the April 2, 2026, hearing on the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification. The information is intimate in nature and identifiable as to each Plaintiff and is the type of information intended to be protected by the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act ("HIPAA"). Should this health information be made available to the public, it could be used for improper purposes, such as to embarrass or defraud the Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs seek an expedited ruling on this Motion because the Hearing is scheduled to occur on April 2, 2026. The information that the parties sought to seal in the briefing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification is substantially the same as that which the Plaintiffs expect will be discussed at the Hearing. The Plaintiffs submit that sealing the courtroom for the Hearing would be consistent with the parties' treatment of HIPAA-protected and other confidential information in this case and request that the Court grant this Motion. The Defendant is a nonprofit organization that provides sexual health care in the United States and globally. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=A8Ytsz at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Klint L. Bruno, Esq. Michael L. Silverman, Esq. Jamie A. Robinson, Esq. Adam J. Feuer, Esq. THE BRUNO FIRM, LLC 205 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 810 Chicago, IL 60601 Telephone: (312) 321-6481 E-mail: kb@brunolawus.com msilverman@brunolawus.com jr@brunolawus.com af@brunolawus.com - and - Bradley A. Benbrook, Esq. Stephen M. Duvernay, Esq. BENBROOK LAW GROUP, PC 701 University Avenue, Suite 106 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916) 447-4900 E-mail: brad@benbrooklawgroup.com POWER SOLUTIONS: Bids for Lead Plaintiff Appointment Due May 19 --------------------------------------------------------------- Law Offices of Howard G. Smith reminds investors of the upcoming May 19, 2026 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the case filed on behalf of investors who purchased Power Solutions International, Inc. ("Power Solutions" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: PSIX) securities between May 8, 2025 and March 2, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"). What Happened? On November 6, 2025, after the market closed, Power Solutions released its third quarter 2025 financial results, revealing that "gross margin in the third quarter of 2025 was 23.9%, a decrease of 5.0%" year over year due in part to "temporary inefficiencies related to our accelerated production ramp-up" for "key data center product lines." Further, the Company revealed it "anticipates . . . sales growth of 45%" for full year 2025, which indicated a sharp deceleration as the Company had reported year-over-year growth of 74% in the second quarter and 65% in the third quarter 2025. On this news, Power Solutions' stock price fell $15.55, or 19.14%, to close at $65.69 per share on November 7, 2025, on unusually heavy trading volume. On March 2, 2026, after the market closed, Power Solutions issued a press release announcing fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results, revealing that gross margin declined 8% year-over-year due to "operating inefficiencies related to [the Company's] accelerated production ramp-up for data center product lines." Further, the Company provided its outlook for 2026, including only "moderate margin improvement from the products serving data center markets." The press release also revealed the Company was "executing specific actions to improve supply chain performance and manufacturing cost structures" but only now "beginning to see measurable improvements, which [it] expect to build and support margin expansion over time." Following these disclosures, Power Solutions stock fell $24.84 or 28.97% to close at $60.91 on March 3, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) the Company overstated its ability to capture sales demand for its power systems solutions, particularly within the data center market; (2) the Company understated the impact of its enhancements to manufacturing capacity to meet demand within the data center market, including the expected costs and the nature of the related "inefficiencies"; and (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. If you purchased or otherwise acquired Power Solutions securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than May 19, 2026 to ask the Court to appoint you as lead plaintiff if you meet certain legal requirements. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you wish to learn more about this class action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112 Bensalem, PA 19020 Telephone: (215) 638-4847 Email: howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com Website: www.howardsmithlaw.com [GN] PRANA LIVING: Blind Users Can't Access Website, Dalton Suit Claims ------------------------------------------------------------------ JULIE DALTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PRANA LIVING, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 0:26-cv-01928-ECT-SGE (D. Minn., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually impaired persons. The Defendant's website, www.prana.com, contains access barriers which hinder the Plaintiff and Class members to enjoy the benefits of their online goods, content, and services offered to the public through the website. The accessibility issues on the website include but not limited to: unclear purpose of certain links and/or buttons on the website, unnarrated moving content, illogical and confusing tab and focus order, and confusing, non-sensical, and disorienting narration. The Plaintiff and Class members seek permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that its website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals. Prana Living, LLC is a company that sells online goods and services in Minnesota. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Patrick W. Michenfelder, Esq. Chad A. Throndset, Esq. Jason Gustafson, Esq. THRONDSET MICHENFELDER, LLC 80 S. 8th Street, Suite 900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (763) 515-6110 Email: pat@throndsetlaw.com chad@throndsetlaw.com jason@throndsetlaw.com PRISMA HEALTH: Mullins Alleges Breach of Fiduciary Duties --------------------------------------------------------- JASMINE MULLINS, KEVIN MOLE, LAURA GILSTRAP, REGINALD WELLS, SABRENA ALEXANDER, STEPHANIE RAMOS, and KAREN MCCLUNEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. PRISMA HEALTH, PRISMA HEALTH RETIREMENT ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF PRISMA HEALTH AND AFFILIATE ORGANIZATIONS, and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants, Case No. 6:26-cv-01092-JDA (D.S.C., March 16, 2026) is a class action brought against the Defendants pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Plaintiffs allege that during the putative Class Period, Defendants, as "fiduciaries" of the Plans, as that term is defined under ERISA, breached the duties it owed to the Plans, to Plaintiffs, and to the other participants in the Plans by, inter alia, failing to objectively and adequately review the Plans' investment portfolio, initially and on an ongoing basis, with due care to ensure that each investment option was prudent, in terms of performance. Specifically, the Defendants allowed substantial assets in the Plans to be invested in a Guaranteed Income Fund, a group annuity insurance contract with Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company. The said Income Fund provided a significantly lower rate of return than other comparable investments that Defendants could have made available to Plan participants, notes the complaint. The Defendants' mismanagement of the Plans, to the detriment of participants and beneficiaries, constitutes a breach of the fiduciary duty of prudence, asserts the complaint. Their actions were contrary to actions of a reasonable fiduciary and cost the Plans and their participants millions of dollars, it adds. During her employment, Plaintiff Mullins participated in the 403(b) Plan and the 401(a) Plan. Ms. Mullin invested in the Prisma Stable Value Fund in the Plans and allegedly suffered injury to her Plan accounts due to underperformance of the Prisma Stable Value Fund. Prisma Health is the Plan sponsor and a Plan administrator with a principal place of business in Greenville, South Carolina.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Nekedia Heath, Esq. HEATH LAW, LLC 311 Pettigru Street Greenville, SC 29601 Telephone: (864) 214-3132 E-mail: nekedia@heathlaw.org - and - Mark K. Gyandoh, Esq. JaJames A. Maro, Esq. CAPOZZI ADLER, P.C. 312 Old Lancaster Road Merion Station, PA 19066 Telephone: (610) 890-0200 E-mail: markg@capozziadler.com jamesm@capozziadler.com QUATRRO BUSINESS: ClassAction.org Investigates Data Breach ---------------------------------------------------------- Attorneys working with ClassAction.org are looking into whether a class action lawsuit can be filed in light of the Quatrro data breach. As part of their investigation, they need to hear from individuals who had their information exposed in the incident, including those who received notice of the Quatrro data breach or otherwise believe they are affected. Quatrro Security Incident: What Happened? Quatrro Business Support Services has reported a data breach that compromised sensitive personal information. According to a sample notification letter, Quatrro identified that unauthorized access to its files occurred from November 11 to 19, 2025. An investigation revealed on February 25, 2026, that the files exposed in the Quatrro data breach contained names and Social Security numbers. Additional information for some individuals included driver’s license numbers, passport details, payment card numbers, financial account data, or health insurance policy numbers. On March 23, 2026, Quatrro began notifying those affected by mail. Quatrro, which now does business as ContinuServe, provides finance, accounting, HR, enterprise applications, and managed IT & cybersecurity services nationwide. What You Can Do After the Quatrro Data Breach If your information was exposed in the Quatrro data breach, attorneys want to hear from you. You may be able to start a class action lawsuit to recover compensation for loss of privacy, time spent dealing with the breach, out-of-pocket costs, and more. A successful case could also force Quatrro to ensure they take proper steps to protect the information they were entrusted with. [GN] RANLIFE REAL: Extension of Class Cert Deadline Sought ----------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as CARI JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. RANLIFE REAL ESTATE, INC., Case No. 2:25-cv-00441-AMA-JCB (D. Utah), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order extending the class certification deadline from March 18, 2026, to April 17, 2026. The Parties have been diligently and productively engaged in discovery since the Court’s scheduling order issued. The Plaintiff and Defendant recently reached agreement regarding outstanding concerns related to the collection and production of certain data relating to the putative class Plaintiff alleges. The information discovered as a result of that resolution is likely to inform, in no small part, a Motion for Class Certification. The Plaintiff estimates that it will require three weeks for her experts to review, analyze, and draft an expert report using the above-referenced discovery once it is received. Extending the Class Certification Deadline in the manner requested would not prejudice any Party in this matter or necessitate any change to any other case management deadline presently set. A copy of the Parties' motion dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=4nF2Ra at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: David J. McGlothlin, Esq. Ryan L. McBride, Esq. KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 3240 E. Union Hills Drive, Suite 105 Phoenix, AZ 85050 Telephone: (800) 400-6808 Facsimile: (800) 520-5523 E-mail: david@kazlg.com ryan@kazlg.com The Defendant is represented by: Joe Stultzjoe Stultz, Esq. YORK HOWELL & GUYMON 10610 South Jordan Gateway, Suite 200 South Jordan, UT 84095 Facsimile: (801) 527-1000 E-mail: admin@yorkhowell.com REMEDY MEDS: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Savage Claims ------------------------------------------------------ ROBIN SAVAGE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. REMEDY MEDS LLC, Defendant, Case No. 8:26-cv-00282 (C.D. Cal., Feb. 12, 2026) seeks to stop the Defendants' practice of making unsolicited calls. Remedy Meds LLC is a technology platform to connect with professional clinicians to provide with non-emergency care. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gerald D. Lane Jr., Esq. THE LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI 1515 NE 26th Street Wilton Manors, FL 33305 Telephone: (754) 444-7539 E-mail: gerald@jibraellaw.com REYNOLDS CONSUMER: Class Cert. Filing in Breitzman Due Sept. 23 --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Breitzman v. Reynolds Consumer Products LLC, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01118 (E.D. Wisc., Filed July 31, 2025), the Hon. Judge Byron B. Conway entered an order granting the joint motion to modify the scheduling order as follows: -- Expert witness disclosure: May 20, 2026 -- Rebuttal expert witness disclosure: July 1, 2026 -- Class Certification and Sept. 23, 2026 Authorization of Notice: -- Fact and expert discovery: Feb. 24, 2027 -- Dispositive motions: March 26, 2027 The nature of suit states Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Reynolds provides quality household essentials and world-class brands.[CC] SAJAN CAFE: Godoy Seeks Proper Wages for Cafeteria Employees ------------------------------------------------------------ Harold Godoy, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff v. Sajan Cafe LLC, and Jose O. Medina, individually, Defendants, Case No. 8:26-cv-00634 (M.D. Fla., March 11, 2026) seeks to recover monetary damages for unpaid regular overtime wages and retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Defendants employed Plaintiff as a non-exempt, full-time cafeteria employee from November 10, 2024, to November 24, 2024, or 2 weeks. Throughout the relevant period, the Plaintiff worked a total of 105 hours per week but he was not paid his wages promptly on payment day, says the suit. Sajan Cafe LLC is a retail business operating as a cafeteria inside the Citgo gas station located in Lutz, Hillsborough County, Florida. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alexis Mena-Glasgow SIMPSON & MENA, P.A. 2250 SW Third Avenue, Suite 501, Miami, FL 33129 Telephone: (305) 912-7665 E-mail: alexis@simsponmenalaw.com SCRIPPS HEALTH: Filing for Class Cert. Bid Due Sept. 11 ------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOHN DOE 1, et al., v. SCRIPPS HEALTH, Case No. 3:23-cv-02215-AGS-DEB (S.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Butcher entered a scheduling order regulating discovery and class certification motion filing deadline: 1. Any motion to join other parties, to amend the pleadings, or to file additional pleadings must be filed on or before May 4, 2026. 2. A telephonic Status Conference to discuss the status of the case and discovery will be held before Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher on May 29, 2026, at 10:30 AM. The Court will send counsel of record audio-only Zoom connection instructions prior to the Status Conference. 3. Merit and class discovery are not bifurcated; however, all discovery for the Plaintiff's motion for class certification must be completed on or before August 7, 2026. 4. A motion for class certification must be filed no later than Sept. 11, 2026. Before filing the motion, movant's counsel must contact Judge Schopler's chambers for a hearing date. 5. Counsel must contact Judge Butcher's chambers at 619-446-3704 regarding setting all remaining case management dates within three (3) days of the Court's ruling on the motion for class certification. Scripps is a nonprofit health care system. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=xRfGpf at no extra charge.[CC] SEMTECH CORP: Continues to Defend Consolidated Securities Suit -------------------------------------------------------------- Semtech Corp. disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for the fiscal period ending January 25, 2026, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2026, that the Company continues to defend itself from a consolidated securities class suit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On February 20, 2025, February 25, 2025 and March 7, 2025, three Company stockholders filed separate, but substantively identical, putative class action complaints against the Company and certain of its current officers, Hong Q. Hou and Mark Lin, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Company securities between August 27, 2024 and February 7, 2025. On June 9, 2025, the court entered an order consolidating the three actions (the "Securities Action"), appointing Luis Collazos as Lead Plaintiff, and Block & Leviton, LLP as Lead Counsel. On July 14, 2025, Lead Plaintiff filed a consolidated putative class action complaint (the "Consolidated Complaint") against the Company, Hou and Lin, on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Company securities between October 10, 2024 and February 7, 2025. The Consolidated Complaint asserts Exchange Act violations related to the Company's disclosure surrounding its CopperEdgeTM products. Lead Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages and other relief. The Company, Hou and Lin filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint on August 11, 2025, which the Court granted in part, and denied in part on October 8, 2025. By virtue of the ruling, Lin is no longer a defendant. On February 6, 2026, the Leading Plaintiff filed a motion for class certification for the period November 25, 2024 to February 7, 2025. At this stage, the Company is unable to form a conclusion as to the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or an estimate of the amount or range of any possible loss resulting from the alleged claims. Semtech Corp is a supplier of high-performance analog and mixed-signal semiconductors and advanced algorithms for infrastructure, high-end consumer and industrial equipment. SEMTECH CORP: Continues to Defend Securities Derivative Suits ------------------------------------------------------------- Semtech Corp. disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for the fiscal period ending January 25, 2026, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2026, that the Company continues to defend itself from securities derivative suits in California. On May 9, 2025, and Aug. 12, 2025, other Company stockholders filed separate derivative actions in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against certain of the Company's directors and officers. On June 6, 2025, and Nov. 24, 2025, other Company stockholders filed separate derivative actions in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Ventura against certain of the Company's directors and officers (together with the complaints filed in federal court, the "Derivative Actions"). The Derivative Actions assert breach of fiduciary duty and other claims based on factual allegations similar to those raised in the Securities Action. The plaintiffs in the Derivative Actions seek damages payable to the Company and declaratory, injunctive and other relief. Semtech Corp is a supplier of high-performance analog and mixed-signal semiconductors and advanced algorithms for infrastructure, high-end consumer and industrial equipment. SITUSAMC HOLDINGS: Class Cert. Bid Filing Due June 14, 2027 ----------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Kelechian v. SitusAMC Holdings Corporation, Case No. 1:25-cv-09748 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Liman entered a revised case management plan and scheduling order as follows: -- The parties have engaged in settlement discussions. The parties have scheduled an in-person mediation with Marc Isserles on April 16, 2026, in New York, New York. -- Any motion to amend or to join additional parties shall be filed no later than May 21, 2026. -- The Defendant's deadline to file a motion to dismiss or otherwise respond to the operative complaint shall be May 21, 2026. -- All fact discovery is to be completed no later than Dec. 14, 2026. -- The Plaintiffs' motion for class certification shall be filed by June 14, 2027. The Defendant's response to the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification shall be filed by Aug. 13, 2027. The Plaintiffs' reply in support of class certification shall be filed by Sept. 27, 2027. -- A hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is scheduled for Jan. 5, 2028, at 10:00AM in Courtroom 15C at the 500 Pearl Street Courthouse. The Defendant provides real estate services. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=oNzuRa at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gregory Haroutunian, Esq. EMERY REDDY, PC 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (916) 823-6955 Facsimile: (206) 441-9711 E-mail: gregory@emeryreddy.com - and - Mariya Weekes, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 333 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 2000 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (866) 252-0878 E-mail: mweekes@milberg.com The Defendant is represented by: Kristine M. Brown, Esq. Donald M. Houser, Esq. Reade Seligmann, Esq. ALSTON & BIRD LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309 Telephone: (404) 881-7000 E-mail: kristy.brown@alston.com donald.houser@alston.com reade.seligmann@alston.com SOFI TECHNOLOGIES: Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Data Breach -------------------------------------------------------------- Top Class Actions reports that plaintiff Joshua Cook filed a class action lawsuit against SoFi Technologies Inc. Why: Cook claims SoFi failed to protect consumers' personal information from a data breach. Where: The SoFi data breach class action lawsuit was filed in California federal court. A new class action lawsuit alleges SoFi Technologies, a fintech company operating as a one-stop digital bank and lending platform, failed to properly secure and safeguard customers' personal information during a data breach in late 2025. Plaintiff Joshua Cook claims the data breach compromised the names, dates of birth, addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, employment information and education information of at least 38,049 individuals. Cook wants to represent a nationwide class and an Illinois subclass of individuals who had their personal information compromised in the SoFi data breach. According to the SoFi class action lawsuit, the company failed to timely notify affected consumers about the data breach or offer adequate assurances that their personal information has been recovered or destroyed. Cook claims SoFi failed to properly monitor or implement reasonable data security measures to protect consumers' personal information. Cook accuses SoFi of negligence, negligence per se, breach of contract, breach of implied contract and unjust enrichment. He also asserts claims for declaratory judgment and violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. SoFi data breach lawsuit claims company failed to comply with industry standards Cook argues that SoFi had obligations created by contract, industry standards, common law and representations made to consumers to keep their personal information confidential and to protect it from unauthorized access and disclosure. The SoFi class action lawsuit points to the substantial increase in cyberattacks in recent years and argues SoFi knew or should have known that its electronic records would be targeted by cybercriminals. Cook says SoFi failed to comply with Federal Trade Commission guidelines and industry standards to protect consumers' personal information. The plaintiff demands a jury trial and requests an order certifying the class action lawsuit. Cook also requests injunctive and other equitable relief, including an order requiring SoFi to implement improved data security measures and purchase or provide funds for lifetime credit monitoring and identity theft insurance for the class members. If your personal information was compromised in a data breach involving a healthcare provider or financial organization, you may have legal options. The plaintiff is represented by M. Anderson Berry, Gregory Haroutunian and Brandon P. Jack of Emery Reddy P.C. and Neil P. Williams of Siri & Glimstad LLP. The SoFi data breach class action lawsuit is Cook v. SoFi Technologies Inc., Case No. 3:26-cv-01722, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. [GN] SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES: Consolidated Derivative Suit Stayed ----------------------------------------------------------- SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-K/A Report for the fiscal period ending Dec. 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2026, that parties in the consolidated shareholder derivative suits entered into a new stipulation on June 20, 2025, staying this consolidated derivative action through the close of fact discovery in the Consolidated Securities Litigation. Two related shareholder derivative actions have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. On March 15, 2024, Abdul Hirani filed a purported derivative complaint against certain current and former SolarEdge executive officers and board members, including Zvi Lando, Ronen Faier, Nadav Zafrir, Betsy Atkins, Marcel Gani, Dana Gross, Dirk Hoke, Avery More, and Tal Payne. The Hirani complaint makes largely the same allegations as those in the Consolidated Securities Litigation and brings claims for (i) breach of fiduciary duty, (ii) aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, (iii) unjust enrichment, (iv) waste of corporate assets, and (v) securities fraud under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and seeks compensatory and punitive damages, interest, attorneys' fees, and other relief. On June 10, 2024, Jonathan Blaufarb filed a second purported derivative complaint in the same court against the same defendants as those named in the Hirani complaint, as well as Lior Danziger and J.B. Lowe. The Blaufarb complaint likewise makes largely the same allegations as those in the Consolidated Securities Litigation, pleads the same counts as those in the Hirani complaint together with additional counts for abuse of control and gross mismanagement, and seeks declaratory relief, corporate governance reforms, damages, restitution, attorneys' fees, and other relief. Defendants accepted service of the Hirani and Blaufarb complaints via stipulation that was so-ordered on July 12, 2024, and the two cases were consolidated with the Hirani matter and designated as the lead case (the "Consolidated Derivative Action"). On September 9, 2024 the parties agreed to stay the Hirani and Blaufarb actions pending a decision on the motion to dismiss in the Consolidated Securities Litigation. Following the decision granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in the Consolidated Securities Litigation, the parties entered into a new stipulation on June 20, 2025, staying this consolidated derivative action through the close of fact discovery in the Consolidated Securities Litigation. Due to the early stage of the proceeding, it cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any, or the likelihood of a potential adverse outcome. The Company disputes the allegations of wrongdoing and intends to vigorously defend against them. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is a global leader in smart energy technology, providing inverter solutions, power optimizers, and related products that manage and optimize solar power generation and other energy systems for residential, commercial, and utility-scale customers. SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES: Continues to Defend Derivative Suit ----------------------------------------------------------- SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-K/A Report for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2026, that the Company continues to defend itself from a consolidated shareholder derivative suits in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Two related shareholder derivative actions have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. On March 15, 2024, Abdul Hirani filed a purported derivative complaint against certain current and former SolarEdge executive officers and board members, including Zvi Lando, Ronen Faier, Nadav Zafrir, Betsy Atkins, Marcel Gani, Dana Gross, Dirk Hoke, Avery More, and Tal Payne. The Hirani complaint makes largely the same allegations as those in the Consolidated Securities Litigation and brings claims for (i) breach of fiduciary duty, (ii) aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, (iii) unjust enrichment, (iv) waste of corporate assets, and (v) securities fraud under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and seeks compensatory and punitive damages, interest, attorneys' fees, and other relief. On June 10, 2024, Jonathan Blaufarb filed a second purported derivative complaint in the same court against the same defendants as those named in the Hirani complaint, as well as Lior Danziger and J.B. Lowe. The Blaufarb complaint likewise makes largely the same allegations as those in the Consolidated Securities Litigation, pleads the same counts as those in the Hirani complaint together with additional counts for abuse of control and gross mismanagement, and seeks declaratory relief, corporate governance reforms, damages, restitution, attorneys' fees, and other relief. Defendants accepted service of the Hirani and Blaufarb complaints via stipulation that was so-ordered on July 12, 2024, and the two cases were consolidated with the Hirani matter. Due to the early stage of the proceeding, it cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any, or the likelihood of a potential adverse outcome. The Company disputes the allegations of wrongdoing and intends to vigorously defend against them. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is a global leader in smart energy technology, providing inverter solutions, power optimizers, and related products that manage and optimize solar power generation and other energy systems for residential, commercial, and utility-scale customers. SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES: Fact Discovery in Securities Suit Ongoing ----------------------------------------------------------------- SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-K/A Report for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2026, that fact discovery is ongoing for the consolidated securities class suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On November 3, 2023, Daphne Shen, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a proposed class action complaint for violation of federal securities laws, individually and putatively on behalf of all others similarly situated, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company, the Company's CEO and the Company's CFO. The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act, as well as violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the individual defendants, and seeks class certification, damages, interest, attorneys' fees, and other relief. It further discloses that on Dec. 13, 2023, Javier Cascallar filed a similar proposed class action, and that on Jan. 2, 2024, six purported lead plaintiffs filed motions in the Shen litigation seeking to consolidate the Cascallar and Shen litigations and appoint lead plaintiffs and lead counsel pursuant to the procedures of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. On February 7, 2024, the Court consolidated the two actions (the "Consolidated Securities Litigation"), and appointed co-lead plaintiffs (the “Plaintiffs”) and lead counsel. On April 22, 2024, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding two additional officers. The amended complaint made substantially similar allegations and claims. Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint on July 15, 2024 (the "Motion"), and the motion was fully briefed as of September 17, 2024. On December 4, 2024, the Court issued an order granting in part the Motion, dismissing all allegations except those relating to two purported misstatements, characterizing inventory levels as low. The Court allowed Plaintiffs to again amend their complaint, and they filed a Second Amended Complaint on January 3, 2025. On February 10, 2025, Defendants moved to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint insofar as it attempts to resurrect any of the allegations dismissed in the Court’s December 4, 2024 order. On April 7, 2025, the Court issued an order granting in part the second motion to dismiss, dismissing all allegations except those characterizing inventory levels as "low" and those relating to demand in Europe. Lead Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification on October 17, 2025, and Defendants filed their opposition on January 16, 2026. Plaintiffs' reply is due on February 20, 2026. Fact discovery is ongoing. Due to the early stage of the proceeding, it cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any, or the likelihood of a potential adverse outcome. The Company disputes the allegations of wrongdoing and intends to vigorously defend against them. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is a global leader in smart energy technology, providing inverter solutions, power optimizers, and related products that manage and optimize solar power generation and other energy systems for residential, commercial, and utility-scale customers. SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES: Isaac Derivative Suit Stayed ---------------------------------------------------- SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-K/A Report for the fiscal period ending Dec. 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2026, that parties in the Isaac derivative suit filed a stipulation on June 30, 2025, staying this derivative action through the close of fact discovery in the Consolidated Securities Litigation. On August 7, 2024, Edwin Isaac filed a purported derivative complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against the same defendants as those named in the Consolidated Derivative Action. The Isaac complaint makes largely the same allegations as those in the Consolidated Securities Litigation. It also pleads the similar counts to the Consolidated Derivative Action, including (i) breach of fiduciary duty, (ii) contribution, (iii) violation of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 14a-9, (iv) unjust enrichment, (v) waste of corporate assets, and (vi) aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. The complaint seeks declaratory relief, damages, interest, unspecified equitable relief, attorneys' fees, and other relief. The parties filed a stipulation on June 30, 2025 agreeing to stay the Isaac matter through the close of fact discovery in the Consolidated Securities Litigation. Due to the early stage of the proceeding, it cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any, or the likelihood of a potential adverse outcome. The Company disputes the allegations of wrongdoing and intends to vigorously defend against them. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is a global leader in smart energy technology, providing inverter solutions, power optimizers, and related products that manage and optimize solar power generation and other energy systems for residential, commercial, and utility-scale customers. SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES: Maddox Derivative Suit Stayed ----------------------------------------------------- SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-K/A Report for the fiscal period ending Dec. 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2026, that parties in the Maddox derivative suit filed a stipulation on July 21, 2025, staying this derivative action through the close of fact discovery in the Consolidated Securities Litigation. On May 22, 2025, Mike Maddox ("Maddox") filed a purported derivative complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the same defendants as those named in the earlier-filed derivative actions. The Maddox complaint makes largely the same allegations as those in the Consolidated Securities Litigation and the other derivative actions. It also pleads similar counts to those in the other derivative actions, including (i) breach of fiduciary duty, (ii) gross mismanagement, (iii) waste of corporate assets, (iv) unjust enrichment, and (v) violation of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act. The parties filed a stipulation on July 21, 2025 agreeing to stay the Maddox matter through the close of fact discovery in the Consolidated Securities Litigation. Due to the early stage of the proceeding, it cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any, or the likelihood of a potential adverse outcome. The Company disputes the allegations of wrongdoing and intends to vigorously defend against them. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is a global leader in smart energy technology, providing inverter solutions, power optimizers, and related products that manage and optimize solar power generation and other energy systems for residential, commercial, and utility-scale customers. STAGWELL INC: Scarantino Sues Over Charter's Noncompliance to DGCL ------------------------------------------------------------------ RICHARD SCARANTINO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. STAGWELL INC., Defendant, Case No. 2026-0369 (Del. Ch., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violation of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The case arises from Stagwell's Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation ("Charter"), which violates Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL. According to the complaint, the Charter's Section 2, Section 2(a), and Section 2(b) violate the DGCL by allowing a provision that eliminates or limits directors' liability for monetary damages for breaches of their fiduciary duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not done in good faith or intentional wrongdoing, or transactions from which a director derives an improper personal benefit. The Plaintiff seeks a declaration that the Charter's Section 2, Section 2(a), and Section 2(b) are void as contrary to Delaware law and public policy. Stagwell Inc. is a digital marketing company based in New York, New York. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Peter B. Andrews, Esq. David M. Sborz, Esq. Andrew J. Peach, Esq. Jackson E. Warren, Esq. ANDREWS & SPRINGER LLC 4001 Kennett Pike, Suite 250 Wilmington, DE 19807 Telephone: (302) 504-4957 Email: pandrews@andrewsspringer.com dsborz@andrewsspringer.com apeach@andrewspringer.com jwarren@andrewsspringer.com - and - J. Abbott R. Cooper, Esq. 1266 East Main Street ABBOTT COOPER PLLC Suite 700R Stamford, CT 06902 Telephone: (475) 477-5031 - and - William J. Fields, Esq. Christopher J. Kupka, Esq. Samir Shukurov, Esq. FIELDS KUPKA & SHUKUROV LLP 141 Tompkins Ave., Suite 404 Pleasantville, NY 10570 Telephone: (212) 231-1500 - and - Richard A. Maniskas, Esq. RM LAW, PC 1055 Westlakes Drive, Suite 300 Berwyn, PA 19312 Telephone: (484) 324-6800 SUPER MICRO: Faces Class Suit Over Export Control Laws Violations ----------------------------------------------------------------- Robbins LLP informs stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Super Micro Computer, Inc. (NASDAQ: SMCI) securities between April 30, 2024 and March 19, 2026. Super Micro is a technology company that designs, develops, and manufactures high-performance server and storage systems, primarily for artificial intelligence ("AI"), data center, and cloud solutions customers. For more information, submit a form at https://robbinsllp.com/super-micro-computer-inc-2/ , email attorney Aaron Dumas, Jr. at adumas@robbinsllp.com, or give us a call at (800) 350-6003. The Allegations: Robbins LLP is Investigating Allegations that Super Micro Computers, Inc. (SMCI) Failed to Disclose Violations of U.S. Export Control Laws According to the complaint, during the class period, defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) a significant portion of the Company's sales of servers were to companies based in China; (2) these transactions violated U.S. export control laws; and (3) there were material weaknesses in the Company's controls to ensure compliance with applicable export control laws and regulations. Plaintiff alleges that on March 19, 2026, after the market closed, the U.S. Justice Department announced the unsealing of an indictment against three individuals associated with Super Micro for engaging in a "scheme to divert massive quantities of servers housing U.S. artificial intelligence technology to customers in China" in violation of U.S. export control laws. The announcement stated these activities were done "all to drive sales and generate revenues in violation of U.S. law" and enabled the sale of "approximately $2.5 billion worth of servers" between 2024 and 2025. According to the DOJ, Yih-Shyan Liaw (the Company's co-founder, director, and Senior Vice President of Business Development), Ruei-Tsang Chang ("a general manager in the [Super Micro's] Taiwan office," and Ting-Wei Sun ("a third-party broker and fixer") "conspired to systematically divert [Super Micro's] servers with certain GPUs to China without a license to do so from the U.S. Department of Commerce." According to media reports, the GPUs are Nvidia's most advanced AI chips. On this news, Super Micro's stock price fell $10.26, or 33.3%, to close at $20.53 per share on March 20, 2026. What Now: You may be eligible to participate in the class action against Super Micro Computers, Inc. Shareholders who wish to serve as lead plaintiff for the class should contact Robbins LLP. The lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. You do not have to participate in the case to be eligible for a recovery. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. For more information, visit https://robbinsllp.com/super-micro-computer-inc-2/ All representation is on a contingency fee basis. Shareholders pay no fees or expenses. About Robbins LLP: A recognized leader in shareholder rights litigation, the attorneys and staff of Robbins LLP have been dedicated to helping shareholders recover losses, improve corporate governance structures, and hold company executives accountable for their wrongdoing since 2002. To be notified if a class action against Super Micro Computers, Inc. settles or to receive free alerts when corporate executives engage in wrongdoing, sign up for Stock Watch today. Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Contacts Aaron Dumas, Jr., Esq. Robbins LLP 5060 Shoreham Pl., Ste. 300 San Diego, CA 92122 (800) 350-6003 adumas@robbinsllp.com www.robbinsllp.com [GN] SWIFT PORK: Force Seeks Leave to File Oversized Brief ----------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as DARRIN FORCE and NICOLLE CRUZ RIVERA, on behalf of themselves and other individuals similarly situated, known and unknown, v. SWIFT PORK COMPANY, Case No. 3:25-cv-03018-SEM-DJQ (C.D. Ill.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order granting unopposed motion for leave to file an oversized brief in support of their motion for class certification. On June 5, 2025, the Court entered the following schedule on Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification: Plaintiffs' motion for class certification due by March 20, 2026; Defendant's response due by April 17, 2026; and Plaintiffs’ reply due by May 8, 2026. Plaintiffs now request leave to file a brief in excess of fifteen (15) pages in support of their Motion for Class Certification. Plaintiffs also request that Defendant be permitted to file an oversized response brief. Defendant does not oppose the request. With Defendant’s approval, Plaintiffs request that the Court permit the following: -- The length of the opening brief shall not exceed 25 pages. -- The length of the opposition brief shall not exceed 25 pages. -- The length of the reply brief shall not exceed 15 pages. The additional pages are necessary for the Parties to adequately address all of the Rule 23 elements and to reasonably present their respective arguments and evidence to the Court. Accordingly, good cause exists to grant the request for leave to file oversized briefs. Swift Pork produces and processes meat products. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=iP2MvX at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Douglas M. Werman, Esq. Maureen A. Salas, Esq. Anne R. Kramer, Esq. WERMAN SALAS P.C. 77 W. Washington St., Ste 1402 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: (312) 419-1008 E-mail: dwerman@flsalaw.com msalas@flsalaw.com akramer@flsalaw.com SYNERGY HEALTH AST: Carmona Suit Removed to N.D. California ----------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Luis Anthony Carmona, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SYNERGY HEALTH AST, LLC a Delaware limited liability company; STERIS CORPORATION, an Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. 26CV00535 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sonoma, to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on March 16, 2026, and assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-02289. The Plaintiff alleges 8 claims on behalf of himself and the putative class members: failure to pay minimum wages; failure to pay overtime compensation; failure to provide meal periods; failure to authorize or permit rest breaks; failure to indemnify necessary business expenses; failure to timely pay final wages at termination; failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements; unfair business practices.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Shannon B. Nakabayashi, Esq. Andres L. Uriarte, Esq. JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 50 California Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4615 Phone: (415) 394-9400 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 Email: Shannon.Nakabayashi@jacksonlewis.com Andres.Uriarte@jacksonlewis.com THC – ORANGE COUNTY: Lawson Suit Removed to S.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Jeff Allen Lawson, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. THC – ORANGE COUNTY, LLC, A California limited liability company; KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; KINDRED HOSPITAL – SAN DIEGO, an entity of unknown form; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No. 26CU006103C was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on March 17, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-01692-H-AHG. The Plaintiff's Complaint alleges a claim under the California Private Attorneys' General Act ("PAGA"). The Complaint asserts a federal question cause of action over which this Court has original jurisdiction pursuant to the Labor Management Relations Act ("LMRA").[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Nathan D. Chapman, Esq. J. Scott Carr, Esq. Melissa A. Meister, Esq. KABAT CHAPMAN & OZMER LLP 707 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 4800 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (213) 493-3980 Email: nchapman@kcozlaw.com scarr@kcozlaw.com mmeister@kcozlaw.com THRASIO LLC: Stain Removers Contains Bacteria, Dickinson Says ------------------------------------------------------------- JEFFREY DICKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. THRASIO, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-00224-LJV (W.D.N.Y., Feb. 6, 2026) is an action seeking to remedy the deceptive and misleading business practices of the Defendant with respect to the manufacturing, marketing, and sale of its Angry Orange Enzyme Stain Removers in Fresh Clean Scent and Orange Twist Scent, throughout the United States which contained Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant has improperly, deceptively, and misleadingly labeled and marketed its Products to reasonable consumers, like the Plaintiff, by omitting and not disclosing to consumers on its packaging that the Products are contaminated or are at risk of being contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a bacteria that can frequently causes pneumonia, bloodstream infections, surgical site infections, and urinary tract infections. Thrasio, LLC operates as an acquirer company. The Company specializes in purchasing operating businesses. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brett R. Cohen, Esq. LEEDS BROWN LAW, P.C. One Old Country Road, Suite 347 Carle Place, NY 11514 Telephone: (516) 873-9550 Email: bcohen@leedsbrownlaw.com TOBIAS READ: Martin Wins Bid for TRO ------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARY MARTIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, V. TOBIAS READ, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Oregon, Case No. 3:26-cv-00433-SI (D. Or.), the Hon. Judge Simon entered an order granting temporary restraining order in favor of named plaintiff only. The Court grants the Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order to provide relief only to the named Plaintiff, Mary Martin, and enters the following Order. The Court enjoins Defendant from enforcing ORS 251.255(2)(a) against the named Plaintiff, Mary Martin, either of that statute's two alternative conditions for publishing in the Oregon statewide Voters' Pamphlet for the May 2026 election Ms. Martin's written argument regarding Measure 120. Stated another way, Defendant may not reject Ms. Martin's written submission on the ground that she has failed to comply with ORS 251.255(2)(a). In the interest of justice, Ms. Martin need not provide any security, and the Court waives all requirements under Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Finally, in her Complaint, Plaintiff defines the putative class as follows: "All low-income and/or disabled Oregon voters who wish to submit a ballot argument for or against Referendum Petition 2026-302 in the official Voters' Pamphlet but are unable to pay the $1,200 fee and cannot realistically gather 500 original wet-ink signatures by March 12, 2026, due to indigency, disability, geographic location, or other barriers. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiffs motion and enjoins Defendant from enforcing against the named Plaintiff, Mary Martin, either of the two alternative conditions in ORS 251.255(2)(a) for publishing in the Oregon statewide Voters' Pamphlet her written argument regarding Measure 120. On September 29, 2025, the Oregon Legislature passed House Bill ("HB") 3991, enacting a transportation funding package that raised the state gasoline tax from $0.40 to $0.46 per gallon, effective January 1, 2026. The bill also nearly doubled vehicle registration and title fees and temporarily doubled the payroll tax for public transit. Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed the bill into law on November 7, 2025. Citizens responded by launching Referendum Petition 2026-302, now known as "Measure 120." This campaign was led by State Representative Ed Diehl and others. Petitioners gathered more than 250,000 signatures, exceeding the 78,116 required under Oregon law for placement of a referendum on the ballot. A copy of the Court's opinion and order dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=942H2S at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ryan Adams, Esq. FIR LAW GROUP LLC Silverton, OR 97381 The Defendant is represented by: Dan Rayfield, Esq. Thomas H. Castelli, Esq. Jacob Reisberg, Esq. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 100 SW Market Street Portland, OR 97201 TOULA JNY: Randolph Sues Over Website's Equal Access to the Blind ----------------------------------------------------------------- ERIKA RANDOLPH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. TOULA JNY INVESTMENTS, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-03059 (N.D. Ill., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and declaratory relief. According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually impaired persons. The Defendant's website, https://www.jny.com, contains access barriers which hinder the Plaintiff and Class members to enjoy the benefits of their online goods, content, and services offered to the public through the website. The accessibility issues on the website include but not limited to: inadequate focus order, ambiguous link texts, inaccessible contact information, lack of alt-text on graphics, the lack of navigation links, the denial of keyboard access for some interactive elements, and the requirement that transactions be performed solely with a mouse. The Plaintiff and Class members seek permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that its website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals. Toula JNY Investments, LLC is a company that sells online goods and services in Illinois. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Uri Horowitz, Esq. 14441 70th Road Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (718) 705-8706 Facsimile: (718) 705-8705 Email: Uri@Horowitzlawpllc.com TOYOTA MOTOR: Reply on Bid to Exclude Expert Testimony Due April 10 ------------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as YAN DONG, SARA HADI and JUN Case No. 2:23-cv-9613-JLS-SSC IMAIZUMI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation, and TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, Case No. 2:23-cv-09613-JLS-SSC (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Staton entered an order granting stipulation for briefing schedule on Defendants motion to exclude Murat Okcuoglu: 1. The Plaintiffs' opposition to the Defendants' motion to exclude The Expert Testimony of Murat Okcuoglu submitted in support of the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is to be filed by March 30, 2026; and 2. The Defendants' reply on the motion to exclude is to be filed by April 10, 2026. Toyota Motor is the North American Toyota sales, marketing, and distribution subsidiary devoted to the United States market. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=VVzBDK at no extra charge.[CC] TWIST BIOSCIENCE: Peters Seeks to Certify Rule 23 Class ------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ANTHONY JOSEPH PETERS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORPORATION, EMILY M. LEPROUST, and JAMES M. THORBURN, Case No. 5:22-cv-08168-EKL (N.D. Cal.), the Plaintiff, on July 29, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., will move the Court for entry of an Order, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, as follows: (1) Certifying the Class (2) Appointing Lead Plaintiff as Class Representative; and (3) appointing Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP ("BFA") as Class Counsel. Pursuant to Section VIII.A of the Court's Civil Standing Order, the undersigned certifies that the parties met and conferred by videoconference on March 10, 2026 for approximately 10 minutes. Lead Plaintiff disclosed the basis for its Motion and the parties were unable to narrow any disputed issues. Lead Plaintiff advances claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 on behalf of the proposed Class. The putative Class consists of: As to claims under the Securities Act, all persons that purchased or otherwise acquired Twist's common stock in the December 2020 Offering pursuant to the 2020 Registration Statement, and were damaged thereby; and As to claims under the Exchange Act, all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Twist's common stock between Dec. 20, 2018, and Nov. 15, 2022, both inclusive, and were damaged thereby. Lead Plaintiff purchased $1,793,008.38 of Twist common stock at artificially inflated prices attributable to the Defendants' fraud during the Class Period. Lead Plaintiff purchased $451,440 of this Twist common stock directly in the December 2020 Offering from an underwriter at the offering price of $110.00. Twist is a synthetic biology company. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Px8jfe at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Adam C. McCall, Esq. Joseph A. Fonti, Esq. Nancy A. Kulesa, Esq. George N. Bauer, Esq. Benjamin Burry, Esq. Thayne Stoddard, Esq. BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP 1330 Broadway, Suite 630 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (415) 445-4003 Facsimile: (415) 445-4020 E-mail: amccall@bfalaw.com jfonti@bfalaw.com nkulesa@bfalaw.com gbauer@bfalaw.com bburry@bfalaw.com tstoddard@bfalaw.com - and - John A. Kehoe, Esq. KEHOE LAW FIRM, P.C. 41 Madison Avenue, 31st Floor New York, NY 10010 Telephone: (215) 792-6676 E-mail: jkehoe@kehoelawfirm.com TYREE OIL: Stevens Sues Over Failure to Secure Clients' Info ------------------------------------------------------------ MARY STEVENS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. TYREE OIL, INC., Defendant, Case No. 6:26-cv-00527-MTK (D. Ore., March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendant for negligence, negligence per se, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of implied contract, and unjust enrichment. The case arises from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information and protected health information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals stored within its network systems following a data breach discovered on or about June 28, 2025. The Defendant also failed to timely notify the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals about the data breach. As a result, the private information of the Plaintiff and Class members was compromised and damaged through access by and disclosure to unknown and unauthorized third parties. Tyree Oil, Inc. is a petroleum provider headquartered in Eugene, Oregon. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kaleigh N. Boyd, Esq. MCNAUL EBEL PLLC One Union Square 600 University Street, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 389-9332 Email: kboyd@mcnaul.com - and - Jeff Ostrow, Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW PA One W. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-4100 Email: ostrow@kolawyers.com UNION PLAZA NURSING: Phillips Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Union Plaza Nursing Home, Inc. The case is styled as Clio Phillips, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Union Plaza Nursing Home, Inc. d/b/a Union Plaza Care Center, Case No. 804870/2026E (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx Cty., March 16, 2026). The nature of suit stated as Torts - Other (Class Action-Unpaid Wages). Union Plaza Care Center -- https://www.unionplazacarecenter.com/ -- provides comprehensive rehabilitation and skilled nursing services to maximize health and well-being.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Louis Ginsberg, Esq. LAW FIRM OF LOUIS GINSBERG, P.C. 1613 Northern Blvd. Roslyn, NY 11576 Phone: 516-625-0105 UNITED STATES: Peralta Sues Over Warrantless Arrests in Ohio ------------------------------------------------------------ MOISES JAVIER AGUILAR PERALTA, F.M., S.T., and JOSE ARMANDO DE LEON ZAPATA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KRISTI NOEM, in her official capacity, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity, ROBERT LYNCH, in his official capacity, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, RODNEY S. SCOTT, in his official capacity, BORDER PATROL, and MICHAEL W. BANKS, in his official capacity, Defendants, Case No. 2:26-cv-00337-SDM-CMV (S.D. Ohio, March 18, 2026) is a class action against the Defendants for violations of 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(a)(2), 8 C.F.R. Section 287.8(c)(2)(ii), the Accardi doctrine, and the Administrative Procedure Act. The case arises from the Defendants' policy and practice of making warrantless arrests in Ohio without making individualized determinations that the person arrested is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained as required by the law. As a result of the Defendants' unlawful policy and practice, the Plaintiffs and members of the proposed Warrantless Arrests Class are facing irreparable harm and require vacatur of the said policy, injunctive relief, and/or declaratory relief to prevent continued and future irreparable injury, suit says. Department of Homeland Security is a federal agency in the U.S. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a component agency of DHS. U.S. Customs and Border Protection is a component agency of DHS. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: John S. Marshall, Esq. Helen M. Robinson, Esq. Edward R. Forman, Esq. Samuel M. Schlein, Esq. Madeline J. Rettig, Esq. MARSHALL, FORMAN AND SCHLEIN, LLC 250 Civic Center Drive, Suite 480 Columbus, OH 43215 Telephone: (614) 463-9790 Facsimile: (614) 463-9780 Email: jmarshall@marshallforman.com hrobinson@marshallforman.com eforman@marshallforman.com sschlein@marshallforman.com mrettig@marshallforman.com - and - Louis A. Jacobs, Esq. MARSHALL, FORMAN AND SCHLEIN, LLC 177 19th Street, Apt. 9C Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (614) 203-1255 Facsimile: (510) 250-9007 Email: LAJOhio@aol.com - and - Frederick M. Gittes, Esq. Jeffrey P. Vardaro, Esq. THE GITTES LAW GROUP 723 Oak Street Columbus, OH 43205 Telephone: (614) 222-4735 Facsimile: (614) 221-9655 Email: fgittes@gitteslaw.com jvardaro@gitteslaw.com - and - Freda J. Levenson, Esq. Amy Gilbert, Esq. ACLU OF OHIO FOUNDATION, INC. 4506 Chester Avenue Cleveland, OH 44103 Telephone: (216) 541-1376 (216) 770-6704 Email: flevenson@acluohio.org agilbert@acluohio.org - and - David J. Carey, Esq. ACLU OF OHIO FOUNDATION, INC. 1108 City Park Avenue, Suite 203 Columbus, OH 43206 Telephone: (380) 215-1972 Email: dcarey@acluohio.org - and - Kathleen Kersh, Esq. Maria Otero, Esq. Gwen Short, Esq. ADVOCATES FOR BASIC LEGAL EQUALITY, INC. 525 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 300 Toledo, OH 43604 Telephone: (937) 535-4408 Email: kkersh@ablelaw.org motero@ablelaw.org gshort@ablelaw.org - and - Vincent W. Wells, Esq. Jesse H. Vogel, Esq. COMMUNITY REFUGEE & IMMIGRATION SERVICES 4645 Executive Drive Columbus, OH 43220 Telephone: (614) 955-9505 Email: vwells@cris-ohio.org jvogel@cris-ohio.org UNITED STATES: Seeks to Replace Documents with Redacted Versions ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as DIEGO N., et al., v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-00577-CJN (D.D.C.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order granting request that the Court replace: (1) Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction with the redacted version attached to this motion as Exhibit A; (2) the Declaration of Toby Biswas with the redacted version attached as Exhibit B; and (3) Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification with the redacted version attached as Exhibit C. As more fully discussed in the Defendants' motion to seal filed concurrently with this motion, Plaintiffs moved to seal certain information on March 6, 2026. The Defendants do not oppose Plaintiffs' motion to seal. In Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, the Declaration of Toby Biswas, and the Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, the Defendants inadvertently disclosed some of the information that the Plaintiffs sought to seal. On March 11, 2026, the Plaintiffs' counsel contacted the Defendants' counsel about the disclosures in these documents. The Defendants' counsel called the clerk of court and asked to restrict access to those three documents pending the filing of redacted documents and a motion to seal. The Department of Health and Human Services provides essential human services in areas such as funding medical studies. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=FT8CZc at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Brett A. Shumate, Esq. Joshua C. Mccroskey, Esq. Jesse A. Montes, Esq. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION Washington, DC 20044 Telephone: (202) 305-1540 E-mail: Joshua.C.McCroskey@usdoj.gov UNITED STATES: Standing Order Entered in Hassan Class Suit ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Hassan S. Kanyike, v. United States of America, Case No. 2:26-cv-02180-JFW (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Walter entered an standing order as follows: The plaintiff shall promptly serve the Complaint in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and shall file the proof(s) of service pursuant to the Local Rules. Lead trial counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court and all Local Rule 7-3, scheduling, status, and settlement conferences. All discovery matters have been referred to a United States Magistrate Judge. Motions shall be filed in accordance with the Local Rules. This Court hears motions on Mondays commencing at 1:30 p.m. A copy of the Court's order dated March 10, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=OdYNrJ at no extra charge.[CC] UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: Court Junks Moeller Suit with Prejudice ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as CLAUDIA MOELLER, v. UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO, and WASHTENAW COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH, Case No. 2:25-cv-12057-SKD-KGA (E.D. Mich.), the Hon. Judge Susan DeClercq entered an order that: 1. The Plaintiff's objections are overruled; 2. The Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, is adopted; 3. The Defendants' motions to dismiss, are granted; 4. The Plaintiff's motion to deny the Defendants' motion to dismiss and allow limited discovery is denied; 5. The Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend her complaint is denied as moot; and 6. The Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice, thereby dismissing the case. In July 2025, Moeller filed a pro se complaint against WCCMH and UT, alleging wage-and-hour violations and sex-based discrimination. University of Toledo is a public research university in Toledo, Ohio. A copy of the Court's opinion and order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=UfUoTd at no extra charge.[CC] UPONOR INC: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Harwood Suit Due Sept. 21 --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARK HARWOOD AND ASHLEY HARWOOD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. UPONOR INC., Case No. 6:25-cv-00090-GLJ (E.D. Okla.), the Hon. Judge Jackson entered an amended scheduling order as follows: The Court enters the following Amended Scheduling Order to govern the parties' actions in this case until a ruling on the Plaintiff's motion for class certification: Exchange of Preliminary Witness Lists and July 10, 2026 Proposed Exhibits (Not Filed of Record): Expert Identification and Reports for Class June 29, 2026 Certification Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) (Not Filed of Record): Class Certification Discovery Cutoff August 10, 2026 (Discovery Requests Must be Served 30 Days in Advance of this Date): Daubert Motions: Sept. 11, 2026 Class Certification Motion filed with all Sept. 21, 2026 supporting evidence: Class Certification Response filed with all Oct. 19, 2026 supporting evidence: Class Certification Reply filed with any Nov. 9, 2026 rebuttal evidence: Evidentiary hearing on Plaintiffs' Jan. 13, 2027, motion for class certification: at 10:00 a.m. Uponor provides plumbing, indoor climate and infrastructure systems. A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=fqlxr0 at no extra charge.[CC] VENEZUELA: Mazzaccone Seeks to Certify Class of ISIN Holders ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as MASSIMO MAZZACCONE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. THE BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA, Case No. 1:24-cv-09114-LGS (S.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order: (1) Certifying a plaintiff Class of all holders of ISIN USP97475AD26 Bonds on December 1, 2024 and who continue to hold thereafter; (2) Appointing the Plaintiff as class representative for the Classes; and (3) Appointing Duane Morris LLP as Class counsel, as well as for such other relief as this Court deems just and proper. The Defendant is a South American nation on the Caribbean coast. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 13, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=LkQgpx at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony J. Costantini, Esq. Rudolph J. DiMassa, Esq. ARTI FOTEDAR Stephanie Lamerce 22 Vanderbilt 335 Madison Avenue, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10017-4669 Telephone: (212) 692-1032 Facsimile: (212) 692-1020 E-mail: ajcostantini@duanemorris.com dimassa@duanemorris.com afotedar@duanemorris.com slamerce@duanemorris.com VENEZUELA: Must Oppose Cavara Class Certification Bid by June 3 --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Cavara et al., v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Case No. 1:25-cv-00165-RA-VF (S.D.N.Y.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order approving their class certification briefing schedule as follows: -- The Defendant shall file its opposition to the class certification motion by June 3, 2026. -- The Plaintiffs shall file their reply brief in support of the class certification motion by July 1, 2026. The parties agree that an extension of these deadlines is needed to allow the parties to complete fact discovery relevant to class certification. Specifically, the parties are coordinating the depositions of the five Plaintiffs. One of the Plaintiffs, Sabine Zahn, is also the lead plaintiff in another proposed class action—Zahn v. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Case No. 24-cv-09271-JPC-HJR (S.D.N.Y.) -- in which the parties are represented by the same undersigned counsel. Given the overlap of legal and factual issues here and in Zahn, the parties have agreed that it would be most efficient to depose Ms. Zahn only once for both actions and plan to schedule the deposition in April. The parties anticipate that the remaining depositions will take place in April and May. The requested briefing schedule will not affect any scheduled discovery deadlines. The Plaintiffs filed their class certification motion on March 5, 2026. Venezuela is a country on the northern coast of South America with diverse natural attractions. A copy of the Parties' motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Jc7Ri1 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr., Esq. Anthony J. Costantini, Esq. Arti Fotedar, Esq. DUANE MORRIS LLP 22 Vanderbilt, 335 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 692-1000 E-mail: ajcostantini@duanemorris.com dimassa@duanemorris.com afotedar@duanemorris.com The Defendant is represented by: Dora Georgescu, Esq. Camilo Cardozo, Esq. Marisa Antonelli, Esq. VINSON & ELKINS LLP 1114 Avenue of Americas, 32nd Floor New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 237-0186 Facsimile: (212) 237-0100 E-mail: ccardozo@velaw.com mantonelli@velaw.com dgeorgescu@velaw.com VF OUTDOOR LLC: Beltran Files Suit in N.D. California ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against VF Outdoor, LLC. The case is styled as Martin Beltran, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. VF Outdoor, LLC, Case No. 3:26-cv-02245 (N.D. Cal., March 16, 2026). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. VF Corporation -- https://www.vfc.com/ -- is an American apparel (clothing) and footwear company founded in 1899 by John Barbey and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: James Michael Treglio, Esq. POTTER HANDY LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (858) 375-7385 Fax: (888) 422-5191 Email: jimt@potterhandy.com WA CUSHION: Bermudez Suit Seeks to Certify Classes -------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARTIN BERMUDEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. W A Cushion SDN, BHD, Case No. 5:24-cv-02376-SSS-ACCV (C.D. Cal.), the Plaintiff, on April 24, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., will move the Court for an order certifying the following Classes: Nationwide Class: "All persons who purchased a subject bed Product on Wayfair.com." California class: "All persons who purchased a subject bed Product in California on Wayfair.com." Excluded from the putative classes are the Defendant and any entities in which Defendant has a controlling interest, the Defendant's employees, the judge to whom this action is assigned, members of the judge's staff, and the judge's immediate family. Also excluded are any claims for personal injury. The Plaintiff further seeks appointment of Smith Krivoshey, PC as Class Counsel, and for Plaintiff Martin Bermudez to be appointed as the Class Representative. This action concerns certain defective bed frames that were sold on Wayfair.com, and later recalled. The Defendant manufactured the roughly 527,177 defective beds. The Plaintiff previously moved for class certification, but the Court denied that motion without prejudice due to insufficient evidence supporting the numerosity requirement. W A Cushion specializes in a diverse range of furniture collections, including bedroom, dining room, and living room furnishings. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=iR7OZD at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Yeremey O. Krivoshey, Esq. Joel D. Smith, Esq. SMITH KRIVOSHEY, PC 28 Geary Street, Ste. 650 # 1507 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 839-7000 E-Mail: yeremey@skclassactions.com joel@skclassactions.com WE CARE OUTPATIENT: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Williard Alleges --------------------------------------------------------------- COY WILLIARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WE CARE OUTPATIENT LLC; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 26STCV04202 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., Feb. 6, 2026) is an action against the Defendants for failure to pay minimum wages, overtime compensation, authorize and permit meal and rest periods, provide accurate wage statements, and reimburse necessary business expenses. Plaintiff Williard was employed by the Defendants as a behavioral technician. We Care Outpatient LLC offer personalized recovery plans, mental health support, family counseling, and holistic wellness programs. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Todd M. Friedman, Esq. Adrian R. Bacon, Esq. Matthew R. Snyder, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C. 23586 Calabasas Rd., Suite 105 Calabasas, CA 91302 Telephone: (323) 306-4234 Facsimile: (866) 633-0228 Email: tfriedman@toddflaw.com abacon@toddflaw.com msnyder@toddflaw.com WEST VIRGINIA EMS: Rose Suit Removed to S.D. West Virginia ---------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Kimberly Rose, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated v. WEST VIRGINIA EMS TECHNICAL SUPPORT NETWORK, INC., Case No. 26-C-45 was removed from the Circuit Court of Cabell County, West Virginia, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia on March 16, 2026, and assigned Case No. 3:26-cv-00203. In her Complaint, Plaintiff asserts claims against Defendant WV EMS purporting to arise under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). Additionally, Plaintiff alleges related violations of the West Virginia Wage Payment and Collection Act ("WPCA"), West Virginia Code, under the theory that WV EMS owes her back pay for the alleged violations of the FLSA.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: James C. Stebbins, Esq. (WVSB #6674) FLAHERTY SENSABAUGH BONASSO, PLLC P.O. Box 3843 Charleston, WV 25338 Phone: 304-345-0200 Facsimile: 304-345-0260 Email: jstebbins@flahertylegal.com WESTECH SECURITY: Rodriguez Wins Class Cert Bid ----------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as KEITH RODRIGUEZ, and others similarly situated, v. WESTECH SECURITY AND INVESTIGATION INC, WILLIAM VASSELL, and "JOHN DOE #1" through "JOHN DOE #10," Case No. 1:25-cv-00123-AT (S.D.N.Y.), granting Plaintiff's motion for class certification pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3). The Court modifies the class definition as follows: "All hourly workers employed by Defendants out of Westech's Throggs Neck location between June 10, 2024 and September 30, 2024, and (a) whose paychecks during this time period were dishonored or were not issued, or (b) who did not receive at least 60 days of advance notice of Westech's shutdown. The Court also entered an order appointing Keith Rodriguez as class representative and Valli Kane & Vagnini LLP and Rissmiller PLLC as class counsel. By April 13, 2026, the Plaintiff's counsel shall submit a proposed form of notice to all class members. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 24. The proposed class can be ascertained by objective documentation, such as employee payroll records and wage statements, and "no subjective criteria is required to determine the class'[s] contours." Therefore, the proposed class is ascertainable. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (the "federal WARN Act"), its New York State counterpart, New York Labor Law ("NYLL") (the "New York WARN Act"), the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), and several other provisions of the NYLL related to unpaid wages. Westech is a security firm. A copy of the Court's order dated March 16, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Lm9vxS at no extra charge.[CC] WESTERN RANGE: Class Cert Filing in Alvarado Due March 4, 2027 -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as CIRILO UCHARIMA ALVARADO, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION, a California non-profit corporation; ELLISON RANCHING COMPANY, a Nevada corporation; JOHN ESPIL SHEEP CO., INC., a Nevada corporation; F.I.M. CORP., a Nevada corporation; THE LITTLE PARIS SHEEP COMPANY, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; BORDA LAND & SHEEP COMPANY, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; HOLLAND RANCH, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; NEED MORE SHEEP CO., LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; and FAULKNER LAND AND LIVESTOCK COMPANY, INC., an Idaho corporation; Case No. 3:22-cv-00249-MMD-CLB (D. Nev.), the Hon. Judge entered an order granting joint discovery plan and scheduling order: Event Deadline The Plaintiff’s Deadline to Disclose November 10, 2026 Experts and Reports in Support of Class Certification The Defendants' Deadline to Disclose January 13, 2027 Rebuttal Experts and Reports in Opposition to Class Certification: The Plaintiff's motion for class March 4, 2027 certification: The Defendants' opposition to motion April 9, 2027 for class certification: Close of Fact and Expert Discovery: Dec. 1, 2027 Deadline to file dispositive Jan. 14, 2028 motions/expert motions: Western Range is a nonprofit association of sheep ranches. A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=mT7OCW at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Bryan D. Dixon, Esq. Scott M. Petersen, Esq. Kirsten R. Allen, Esq. Tanner J. Bean, Esq. FABIAN VANCOTT 2275 Corporate Circle, Ste. 220 Henderson, NV 89074 Telephone: (702) 233-4444 E-mail: bdixon@fabianvancott.com spetersen@fabianvancott.com kallen@fabianvancott.com tbean@fabianvancott.com WESTERN RANGE: Parties Seek to Amend Scheduling Order ----------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as CIRILO UCHARIMA ALVARADO, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION, a California non-profit corporation; ELLISON RANCHING COMPANY, a Nevada corporation; JOHN ESPIL SHEEP CO., INC., a Nevada corporation; F.I.M. CORP., a Nevada corporation; THE LITTLE PARIS SHEEP COMPANY, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; BORDA LAND & SHEEP COMPANY, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; HOLLAND RANCH, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; NEED MORE SHEEP CO., LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; and FAULKNER LAND AND LIVESTOCK COMPANY, INC., an Idaho corporation; Case No. 3:22-cv-00249-MMD-CLB (D. Nev.), the Parties ask the Court to enter granting stipulated motion to amend joint discovery plan and scheduling order: Event Deadline The Plaintiff’s Deadline to Disclose Nov. 10, 2026 Experts and Reports in Support of Class Certification The Defendants' Deadline to Disclose Jan. 13, 2027 Rebuttal Experts and Reports in Opposition to Class Certification: The Plaintiff's motion for class March 4, 2027 certification: The Defendants' opposition to motion April 9, 2027 for class certification: Close of Fact and Expert Discovery: Dec. 1, 2027 Deadline to file dispositive Jan. 14, 2028 motions/expert motions: Western Range is a nonprofit association of sheep ranches. A copy of the Parties' motion dated March 12, 2026, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=EAgbEx at no extra The Plaintiff is represented by: Leah L. Jones, Esq. THIERMAN BUCK LLP 7287 Lakeside Dr. Reno, NV 89511 E-mail: leah@thiermanbuck.com - and - Jamie Crooks, Esq. Rucha Desai, Esq. FAIRMARK PARTNERS, LLP 1825 7th St., NW, #821 Washington, DC 20001 E-mail: jamie@fairmarklaw.com rucha@fairmarklaw.com - and - David H. Seligman, Esq. Alexander Hood, Esq. TOWARDS JUSTICE Denver, CO 80237 E-mail: david@towardsjustice.org alex@towardsjustice.org - and - Yaman Salahi, Esq. SALAHI PC 505 Montgomery Street, 11th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 E-mail: yaman@salahilaw.com The Defendants are represented by: Ellen Jean Winograd, Esq. SIMONS HALL JOHNSTON PC 690 Sierra Rosa Drive Reno, NV 89511 E-mail: EWinograd@SHJNevada.com - and - Jose Tafoya, Esq. WOODBURN AND WEDGE 6100 Neil Road Suite 500 Reno, NV 89511 E-mail: jtafoya@woodburnandwedge.com - and - Dennis Cuneo, Esq. Rebecca A. Hause-Schultz, Esq. David B. Witkin, Esq. FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 1401 New York Ave., NW, Ste. 400 Washington, DC 20005 E-mail: dcuneo@fisherphillips.com rhause-schultz@fisherphillips.com dwitkin@fisherphillips.com - and - Jerry M. Snyder, Esq. JERRY SNYDER LAW 429 Plumb Ln. Reno, NV 89509 E-mail: jerry@Jerrysnyderlaw.com - and - Anthony L. Hall, Esq. Duncan G. Burk, Esq. Jonathan A. Mcguire, Esq. SIMONS HALL JOHNSTON PC 690 Sierra Rose Dr., Reno, NV 89511 E-mail: AHall@SHJNevada.com DBurke@SHJNevada.com - and - Matthew B. Hippler, Esq. April M. Medley, Esq. Cory A. Talbot, Esq. April M. Medley, Esq. Cory A. Talbot, Esq. HOLLAND & HART LLP 5470 Kietzke Lane, Ste. 100 Reno, NV 89511 E-mail: mhippler@hollandhart.com ammedley@hollandhart.com catalbot@hollandhart.com ammedley@hollandhart.com catalbot@hollandhart.com - and - Bryan D. Dixon, Esq. Scott M. Petersen, Esq. Kirsten R. Allen, Esq. Tanner J. Bean, Esq. FABIAN VANCOTT 2275 Corporate Circle, Ste. 220 Henderson, NV 89074 Telephone: (702) 233-4444 E-mail: bdixon@fabianvancott.com spetersen@fabianvancott.com kallen@fabianvancott.com tbean@fabianvancott.com WHITESTONE HOME: Hollingsworth Sues Over Unpaid Wages ----------------------------------------------------- Lysa Hollingsworth, individually, and on behalf of the State of California and Aggrieved Employees v. WHITESTONE HOME FURNISHINGS, Case No. 26STCV08488 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., March 17, 2026), is brought against the Defendant for unpaid wages include, but are not limited to minimum wages, overtime compensation, premium pay for missed, untimely, incomplete, and/or interrupted meal and rest periods, and reimbursement for any work-related expenses incurred,, in violation of the California Labor Code § 226.7 and IWC Wage Order No. 4. The Defendant violated California Labor Code as well as Industrial Welfare Commission ("IWC") Wage Order No. 4, because it failed to provide Plaintiff and other similarly situated aggrieved employees a thirty-minute, uninterrupted meal period for every 5 hours of work. The Defendant also violated California Labor Code and the IWC Wage Order No. 4 because it failed to provide Plaintiff and other similarly situated aggrieved employees with ten-minute rest periods for every four hours of work, or majority portion thereof, throughout their employment. As a further result, Defendant Whitestone violated California Labor Code because it failed to compensate Plaintiff and other similarly situated aggrieved employees overtime compensation, even though they worked more than 8 hours per day, 12 hours per day, and/or 40 hours per week, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was employed by Defendant Whitestone as a Customer Service Representative beginning in April 2025 and continuing through the time of her separation in November 2025. WHITESTONE HOME FURNISHINGS, LLC, a California limited liability company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Arthur Sezgin, Esq. Alisa Khousadian, Esq. SEZGIN KHOUSADIAN LLP 500 North Central Avenue, Suite 830 Glendale, CA 91203 Phone: (818) 696-1330 Fax: (818) 696-1331 Email: arthur@sklaw.legal alisa@sklaw.legal [^] 10th Class Action Money & Ethics Conference -- 2026 Sponsors ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mark your calendar for the 10th Annual Class Action Money & Ethics Conference, presented by Beard Group, Inc. #CAME2026 will be held May 20-21, 2026, at The Harmonie Club, in New York City. This year's gathering is being sponsored by: * Class Action Money & Ethics 2026 Co-Chairs: Esquire Bank Succeed Boldly https://esquirebank.com/ EisnerAmper Smarter Safeguards. Stronger Outcomes. https://www.eisneramper.com/ * Major Sponsors: Labaton Keller Sucharow History of expertise. Reputation for excellence. https://www.labaton.com/ Covalynt The Bond Between Complex Litigation and Data Science. https://covalynt.com/ * Patron Sponsors: Duane Morris https://www.duanemorris.com/ Darrow Legal Intelligence that Drives Better Outcomes. https://www.darrow.ai/ Tremendous Send gift cards and money instantly https://www.tremendous.com/ Federated Hermes https://www.federatedhermes.com/ * Supporting Sponsors: Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein https://www.lieffcabraser.com/ AB Data https://www.abdataclassaction.com/ Contingency Capital Global asset management business focused on credit oriented legal assets https://www.contingencycapital.com/ Morgan Stanley Navigate Volatility. Unlock Opportunity. Active Fixed Income https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-pe/institutional-investor.html ATTICUS Administration Smart | Accountable | Better https://www.atticusadmin.com/ This exclusive in-person gathering brings together the industry's top professionals to explore the latest trends, challenges, and opportunities in class action litigation. #CAME2026 features: Insightful keynote presentations from leading experts Dynamic live panel discussions tackling cutting-edge issues Valuable networking opportunities with peers and influencers This year's event kicks off with the Opening Night Cocktail Reception on May 20th from 5:00–7:00 p.m. Whether you're a plaintiff attorney, defense counsel, funder, or industry stakeholder, this is the must-attend event of the year for staying ahead in class action practice. Register today and secure your spot at this value-packed conference! Click here -- https://www.classactionconference.com/2025-video-replays.html -- for the 2025 conference videos, available to purchase and download. For sponsorship and other information, contact Will Etchison at 305-707-7493 or will@beardgroup.com, or visit https://www.classactionconference.com/ CLE accreditation will be submitted upon request -- details available on the website. ********* S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA. Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L. Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors. Copyright 2026. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272. This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the publishers. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed. The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000. *** End of Transmission ***