260114.mbx

260114.mbx C L A S S A C T I O N R E P O R T E R Wednesday, January 14, 2026, Vol. 28, No. 10 Headlines 1023 MONTEREY: Standing Order Entered in Coronitas Class Suit ADANA RESTAURANT: Oattes Sues Over Unlawful Labor Practices BABS DELTA: Ramos Sues Over ADA Non-Compliant Facilities BLUE CROSS: Faces Falls Suit Over Illegal Wiretapping BURLINGTON COAT: Marquez Files Suit Over Disability Discrimination CALERES INC: Ramirez Labor Suit Removed to C.D. Calif. CAPITOL SAND & GRAVEL: Williams Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. CERNER CORP: Faces Tatum Suit Over Private Data Breach CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS: Barber Sues Over Improper TV Surcharges CREDIT WHOLESALE: Misclassifies Sales Managers, Pyle Suit Says EMBLEMHEALTH INC: Engages in Unfair Business Practices, Suit Says EUROPEAN STYLE: Pittman Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website EVERLANE INC: Talley Misleading Email Suit Removed to W.D. Wash. FIRST STUDENT: Removes Apodaca Suit to E.D. Calif. GALDERMA LABORATORIES: Albrigo Sues Over Mislabeled Sunscreens GOLDEN DRAGON: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Mendoza Alleges HUEL INC: Leonard Sues Over Mislabeled Ready to Drink Shakes JAJAJA WEST: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Galvez Alleges JRK RESIDENTIAL: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Castleberry Alleges LEW THOMPSON: Removes Garcia Class Suit to E.D. Calif. LUXOTTICA OF AMERICA: Faces Moore Suit for Invasion of Privacy MEHRI & SKALET: Fails to Secure Personal Info, Ti Ng Suit Says MEJURI (US) INC: Proveyer Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website MICROSOFT CORP: Garcia Sues Over Data Privacy Violations MITO FORT: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Lopez Suit Alleges MONSANTO COMPANY: Hester Sues Over Wrongful Sale of Herbicide MONSANTO COMPANY: Hickerson Sues Over Negligent Herbicide Sale MONSANTO COMPANY: Hicks Sues Over Wrongful Advertising and Sale MONSANTO COMPANY: Hidalgo Sues Over Negligent Sale of Herbicide MONSANTO COMPANY: Horn Sues Over Wrongful Distribution of Herbicide MONSANTO COMPANY: Ritter Sues Over Negligent Advertising and Sale MONSANTO COMPANY: Van Zeeland Sues Over Wrongful Herbicide Sale MONSANTO COMPANY: Webking Sues Over Negligent Advertising and Sale MONSANTO COMPANY: Werth Sues Over Wrongful Herbicide Distribution NAHGA INC: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Rich Suit Alleges NOAH HODGIN: Bid to Compel Arbitration in Isagenix Suit OK'd O'REILLY AUTO: Class Certification Deadline Continuation Sought ONITY GROUP: Bid to Certify Class Tossed OSF HEALTHCARE: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Blum Suit Alleges PBIGROUP INC: Web Site Not Accessible to the Blind, Ford Says PREMIER MAGNESIA: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Helton Alleges PRENTKE ROMICH: Jackson Seeks Final Approval of Class Settlement PRESTIGE INT'L: Rodriguez Class Cert Bid Tossed as Moot PUTNAM COUNTY, IN: Mitchell Seeks to Recover Unpaid Wages RARE BEAUTY: Talley Suit Removed to W.D. Washington RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES: Bid to Extend Class Cert Deadline Sought REGAL CINEMAS INC: Bozanich Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ROBERT LUNA: Stewart Allowed to Seal Certain Exhibits ROYAL CARIBBEAN: Perry Consumer Suit Removed to W.D. Wash. SABOR LATINO: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Baez Suit Alleges SALESFORCE INC: De La Espada Suit Transferred to N.D. Illinois SAM'S EXCAVATING: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Gilliam Alleges SANFORD SURROUNDED: Class Cert. Bid Filing Extended to June 16 SAYSH CORP: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Pittman Suit Claims SERENITY PATH RECOVERY: Ibarra Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. SHINESTY INC: Youngren Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website SKRATCH LABS: Web Site Not Accessible to the Blind, Hampton Says SLED DISTRIBUTION: Cerkezoglu Suit Removed to W.D. Washington SNOW COMMERCE: Calcano Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website SOFI SECURITIES: Shah Suit Removed to N.D. California SOUL INSOLE: Calcano Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website SPF SCREENS: Wilson Seeks More Time to File Class Certification SUBARU OF AMERICA: Court Narrows Claims in Robinson Suit SWANSON HEALTH PRODUCTS: Card Files TCPA Suit in D. Kansas SYNGENTA CROP: Herbicide Contains Toxic Chemical, Brumfield Says SYNOPSYS INC: City of Sterling Sues Over Drop in Share Price TOTAL RENAL CARE: Castaneda Suit Removed to C.D. California TOWNE MORTGAGE: Seven Class Actions Consolidated TRANS UNION LLC: Johnson Suit Transferred to N.D. Illinois TREE SERVICE NASSAU: Quintero Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. TRIZETTO PROVIDER: Barbera Sues Over Failure to Secure PHI/PII ULTA SALON: Repperger Suit Transferred to E.D. Washington UNILEVER UNITED: Gardner Sues Over Mislabeled Deodorant Product UNITED STATES: Rodriguez Balks at Withdrawal of Assistance Claims VENEZUELA: Zahn Seeks to Modify Class Cert Briefing Schedule VETERANS GUARDIAN: Ford Wins Bid for Class Certification VOLUSIA COUNTY, FL: Powell Amended Complaint Tossed w/o Prejudice WEAR THE PEACE: Calcano Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website WESTERN REFINING RETAIL: Heater Suit Removed to C.D. California WICKED TACO: Gonzalez Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Bid WISE US INC: Calcano Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website WOVEN NOOK: Davis Seeks Equal Website Access for Blind Users X CORP: Filing for Class Cert Bid in White Coat Suit Due Feb. 16 XERIS PHARMACEUTICALS: Faces Suit Over Unprotected Personal Info ********* 1023 MONTEREY: Standing Order Entered in Coronitas Class Suit ------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Coronitas Holdings, LLC. et al., v. 1023 Monterey Investors, LLC, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-11946-JFW-SK (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Walter entered a standing order as follows: The plaintiff shall promptly serve the Complaint in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and shall file the proof(s) of service pursuant to the Local Rules. The plaintiff is notified that failure to serve the Complaint as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) will result in the dismissal of the Complaint against the unserved defendant(s). Lead trial counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court and all Local Rule 7-3, scheduling, status, and settlement conferences. Only ONE attorney for a party may be designated as lead trial counsel unless otherwise permitted by the Court. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 29, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=dxlIWJ at no extra charge.[CC] ADANA RESTAURANT: Oattes Sues Over Unlawful Labor Practices ----------------------------------------------------------- JALONDA OATTES, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. ADANA RESTAURANT LLC, NASEEB RANA, OKAN OZYURTERI, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-07275-TWT-AWH (N.D. Ga., December 19, 2025) is an action seeking monetary relief for injuries sustained by the Plaintiff as a result of Defendant's discriminatory employment practices, workplace harassment, and retaliatory termination pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Civil Rights Act, and the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. Plaintiff Oattes, an African-American, began working for Adana as a server in April 2025. According to the complaint, the Defendants discriminated against Oattes by treating her less favorably than similarly-situated employees on the basis of race and on the basis of sex by creating a hostile work environment. The Defendants also failed to pay Plaintiff Oattes overtime wages and engaged in retaliatory conduct and defamatory statements, says the suit. Adana Restaurant LLC is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Georgia.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jacob O. Medoff, Esq. CONWAY EADER LLLP 50 Hurt Plz SE, Suite 1142 Atlanta, GA 30303 Telephone: (470) 764-7164 E-mail: jake@conwayeader.com BABS DELTA: Ramos Sues Over ADA Non-Compliant Facilities -------------------------------------------------------- Oscar Ramos, Plaintiff v. Babs Delta Diner, Inc., a California corporation; Chulsoo Han, Trustee; Shin Hee Han, Trustee; and Does 1 to 50, Defendants, Case No. 4:26-cv-00021 (N.D. Cal., January 2, 2026), is a class action accusing the Defendants of violating the California Health and Safety Code, the California Civil Code, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The Defendants allegedly interfered with Plaintiff's access to the restaurant business due to several architectural barriers. The Defendants also failed to provide proper and accessible entryways, and accessible accommodations. The Defendants, and each of them, by these barriers, discriminated against Plaintiff, on the basis of his physical disability, and interfered with his access to the business and its facilities, says the suit. Babs Delta Diner, Inc. owns and operates a restaurant in Suisun City, California. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Richard Mac Bride, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD A. MAC BRIDE 855 Marina Bay Parkway, Suite 210 Richmond, CA 94804 Telephone: (415) 730-6289 E-mail: richardmacbridelaw@gmail.com BLUE CROSS: Faces Falls Suit Over Illegal Wiretapping ----------------------------------------------------- BRUCE W. FALLS; MARGARET JEAN CIOLEK FAY; ELLIOTT A. DAVIS; CRAIG DIEGEL; and KATHY MORREN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-14194-MFL-KGA (E.D. Mich., Dec. 31, 2025) alleges violation of the Federal Wiretap Act. The Plaintiffs allege in the complaint that the Defendant harvested highly sensitive health-related information from its insureds using hidden tracking tools and secretly disseminated this private health-related information to third parties. The Plaintiffs were not notified of Defendant's hidden tracking and harvesting of their private information, which began as soon as Plaintiffs loaded Defendant's www.bcbsm.com website. Nor were Plaintiffs provided an opportunity to limit, or consent to, Defendant's tracking and harvesting of their personal health information. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company operates as a non profit organization. The Organization provides health insurance for individual plans. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: R.J. Cronkhite, Esq. CRONKHITE COUNSEL PLLC 36800 Woodward Ave., Suite 310 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 Telephone: (248) 309-8601 Facsimile: (248) 256-2555 Email: rj@cronkhitelaw.com - and - Andrew D. Schlichter, Esq. Alexander L. Braitberg, Esq. Chen Kasher, Esq. Cort VanOstran, Esq. SCHLICHTER BOGARD LLC 100 South Fourth Street, Suite 1200 St. Louis, MO 63102 Telephone: (314) 621-6115 Facsimile: (314) 621-5934 Email: aschlichter@uselaws.com abraitberg@uselaws.com ckasher@uselaws.com cvanostran@uselaws.com BURLINGTON COAT: Marquez Files Suit Over Disability Discrimination ------------------------------------------------------------------ OLGA SANCHEZ MARQUEZ, Plaintiff v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION, a foreign for-profit corporation, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-25992 (S.D. Fla., December 19, 2025) is a class action brought by the Plaintiff, on behalf of others similarly situated blind and visually disabled individuals, for declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney's fees, costs, and litigation expenses for unlawful disability discrimination in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff is and at all relevant times has been a visually disabled person who has been medically diagnosed with pathologic myopia with central chorioretinal atrophy secondary to her myopia and Addisson's disease. On October 15, 2025, the Plaintiff visited and sought to patronize and purchase merchandise from Defendant's Cutler Bay store. During her visit, the Plaintiff attempted to use one of the store's point of sale devices to complete her purchase using her debit card and, in doing so, attempted to access the information displayed on the POS device's screen by plugging her personal headset into the device. However, the Plaintiff was unable to independently and privately pay for her order through the POS device because the device did not have any place on it for Plaintiff to plug in her headset nor was the device configured with screen reader software or tactile feedback that would effectively communicate to Plaintiff the visual information displayed on the POS device's screen. As a result of the store's POS device not being fully accessible to, and not being independently and privately usable by, blind and visually disabled persons, the Plaintiff was unable to fully access and use the device to effectively, efficiently, and independently make her purchase in the physical store, says the suit. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation retails apparels. The Company offers clothing for men's, women's, and children's as well as linens, bath shop items, gifts, and accessories. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouses operates in the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Roderick V. Hannah, Esq. RODERICK V. Hannah, ESQ., P.A. 4800 N. Hiatus Road Sunrise, FL 33351 Telephone: (954) 362-3800 Facsimile: (954) 362-3779 E-mail: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com - and - Pelayo M. Duran, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A. 6355 N.W. 36th Street, Suite 307 Virginia Gardens, FL 33166 Telephone: (305) 266-9780 Facsimile: (305) 269-8311 E-mail: duranandassociates@gmail.com CALERES INC: Ramirez Labor Suit Removed to C.D. Calif. ------------------------------------------------------ The case styled JESUS RAMIREZ, individually, and on behalf of other similarly situated employees, Plaintiff v. CALERES, INC; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. CIVRS2508046, was removed from the Superior Court of California for the County of San Bernardino, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on January 2, 2026. The Clerk of Court for the Central District of California assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-00014 to the proceeding. The case asserts claims for violations of the California Labor Code and the California Business & Professions Code. Caleres, Inc. is a footwear company headquartered in Missouri. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Christopher W. Decker, Esq. Haik Kolsuzyan, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 239-9800 Facsimile: (213) 239-9045 E-mail: christopher.decker@ogletree.com haik.kolsuzyan@ogletree.com CAPITOL SAND & GRAVEL: Williams Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Capitol Sand & Gravel Co., et al. The case is styled as William Williams, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Capitol Sand & Gravel Co., Does 1-100, Case No. 25CV031690 (Cal. Super. Ct., SacramentoCty., Dec. 31, 2025). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case." Capitol Sand and Gravel Co. is a privately-held company that operates in the commercial & industrial engineering industry. Capitol Sand and Gravel Co.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason W. Rothman, Esq. BIBIYAN LAW GROUP, P.C. 1460 Westwood Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90024 Phone: 310-438-5555 Fax: 310-300-1705 Email: Jason@tomorrowlaw.com CERNER CORP: Faces Tatum Suit Over Private Data Breach ------------------------------------------------------ CARRINGTON TATUM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CERNER CORPORATION d/b/a ORACLE HEALTH, INC., and ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM SUNBELT HEALTHCARE CORPORATION d/b/a ADVENTHEALTH, Defendants, Case No. 6:26-cv-00010 (M.D. Fla., January 4, 2026) arises from a recent cyberattack resulting in a data breach of sensitive information in the possession and custody and/or control of Defendants. Following an internal investigation, Defendants learned the data breach which occurred on January 22, 2025, resulted in unauthorized disclosure, exfiltration, and theft of current and former patients' personally identifying information, including names, Social Security number as well as personal health information. The Plaintiff alleges that Defendants failed and/or continue to fail to promptly inform Class Members even though Plaintiff and thousands of Class Members had their most sensitive personal information accessed, exfiltrated, and stolen. Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks redress for Defendants' unlawful conduct and asserts claims for negligence, negligence per se, breach of implied contract, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. Cerner Corporation offers electronic health record and business operations systems to hospitals and healthcare organizations. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jeff Ostrow, Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW P.A. 1 W Las Olas Blvd, Suite 500 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 332-4200 E-mail: ostrow@kolawyers.com - and - Amina A. Thomas, Esq. COHENMALAD, LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Telephone: (317) 636-6481 Facsimile: (317) 636-2593 E-mail: ltoops@cohenmalad.com athomas@cohenmalad.com CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS: Barber Sues Over Improper TV Surcharges --------------------------------------------------------------- BARBARA BARBER; ANTONIO DUENAS; ALFRED HOLGUIN; and ANDREW EPSTEIN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a SPECTRUM, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-12361 (C.D. Cal., Dec. 30, 2025) is an action against Charter to challenge its unfair, deceptive, and unlawful business practice of advertising artificially low monthly prices for cable television services while concealing and misrepresenting the true cost of service through an undisclosed and ever-increasing charge known as the "Broadcast TV Surcharge" (the "BTS"). According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, the hidden fee, imposed without adequate disclosure or contractual basis, functions as a deceptive price increase in violation of federal truth-in billing requirements, state consumer protection statutes, and well-established principles of contract law. By concealing and misrepresenting the BTS, Charter has duped millions of consumers nationwide into paying unlawful and inflated charges. This deceptive scheme enables Charter to market ostensibly low prices while quietly shifting the true cost of service onto unsuspecting subscribers. Charter's conduct not only causes substantial economic injury to consumers but also distorts competition in the marketplace by allowing Charter to advertise prices that appear lower than those of rival providers who accurately disclose their charges, the suit alleges. Charter Communications, Inc. operates as a cable telecommunications company. The Company offers cable broadcasting, internet, voice, and mass media services. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Alexander H. Winnick, Esq. WINNICK LAW, PC 2450 Colorado Ave., Suite 100E Santa Monica, CA 90404 Telephone: (424) 317-7411 Cellphone: (310) 415-5594 Email: aw@winlawpc.com - and - Maurice R. Mitts, Esq. MITTS LAW, LLC 1822 Spruce Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 866-0112 Facsimile: (215) 866-0113 Email: mmitts@mittslaw.com - and - Evan Murphy, Esq. MURPHY ADVOCATES LLC 338 Selma Avenue St. Louis, MO 63119 Telephone: (314) 753-5212 Email: evan@murphyadvocates.com CREDIT WHOLESALE: Misclassifies Sales Managers, Pyle Suit Says -------------------------------------------------------------- JEREMIAH PYLE, Plaintiff v. CREDIT WHOLESALE COMPANY, INC, d/b/a WHOLESALE PAYMENTS, and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants, Case No. 5:25-cv-00277-H (N.D. Tex., December 19, 2025) is a class action brought by the Plaintiff, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, for Defendants' unlawful labor practices in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Texas law. The case arises from Credit Wholesale's uniform scheme to classify managers and related sales personnel as independent contractors on paper while exercising pervasive control over their day-to-day work, paying them as W-2 employees, providing benefits and company infrastructure, and imposing standardized compensation and chargeback policies. Credit Wholesale's policies, handbooks, contracts, and centralized practices applied uniformly to Plaintiff and the putative class/collective members and resulted in common injuries including unpaid overtime, improper deductions/set-offs, and manipulation of residual compensation through company-controlled reporting systems, says the suit. Class Plaintiff Jeremiah Pyle worked for Credit Wholesale in Texas as a sales manager and team leader from approximately August 1, 2020, through 2024. Credit Wholesale Company, Inc. d/b/a Wholesale Payments, Inc. is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Lubbock. The Company operates as a payment processing company that employed and/or jointly employed Plaintiff and the putative class/collective members.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Robert J. Bogdanowicz, III, Esq. J. Collin Spring, Esq. BURKE BOGDANOWICZ PLLC 1201 Elm Street, Suite 4000 Dallas, TX 75270 Telephone: (214) 888-2824 E-mail: rob@burkebog.com jspring@burkebog.com EMBLEMHEALTH INC: Engages in Unfair Business Practices, Suit Says ----------------------------------------------------------------- THE AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION; THE NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION, on their behalf and in an associational capacity on behalf of their members; MILEN BEYENE; VALERIA CALDERON; ELIZABETH CANTY; BONNIE DORIS ELLIOTT; DANIEL RICCOBONO; and NIMROD SHIMRONY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. EMBLEMHEALTH, INC.; and EMBLEMHEALTH PLAN, INC., Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-10783 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2025) alleges that the Defendants are engaged in unfair competition and false affiliation in violation of Section 43 of the Lanham Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that EmblemHealth misrepresented the size and quality of its network, where EmblemHealth attracts more members and increases its share of the market. This increased number of members' premiums and administrative fees are then paid to EmblemHealth. EmblemHealth is thus unjustly enriched from its misrepresentations about its network's breadth. By misrepresenting the size and quality of its network, EmblemHealth also attracts more employers, including New York City, to retain EmblemHealth to administer health plans offered to their employees, says the suit. EmblemHealth Inc. provides health care insurance and benefit plans. The Company offers health risk assessments, personal health records management. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Sara Haviva Mark, Esq. MARK HEALTH LAW PLLC 909 Third Avenue, #792 New York, NY 10150 Telephone: (646) 504-1850 Email: Sara@MarkHealthLaw.com - and - Caroline E. Reynolds, Esq. ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP 2100 L Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20037 Telephone: (202) 778-1800 Email: CReynolds@Zuckerman.com - and - Jason S. Cowart, Esq. ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP 485 Madison Ave., 19th flr. New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 704-9600 Email: JCowart@Zuckerman.com - and - D. Brian Hufford, Esq. THE HUFFORD LAW FIRM PLLC 76 Midland Avenue Rye, NY 10580 Telephone: (614) 371-3657 Email: dbhufford@huffordlawfirm.org - and - Raphael Janove, Esq. JANOVE PLLC 500 7th Ave., 8th Fl. New York, NY 10018 Telephone: (646) 347-3940 Email: Raphael@janove.law EUROPEAN STYLE: Pittman Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ------------------------------------------------------------ DEBBIE PITTMAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. European Style Inc., Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-00013 (N.D. Ill., January 2, 2026) accuses the Defendant of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act. Plaintiff Pittman brings this civil rights action against Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by her and other blind or visually-impaired individuals. Despite readily available accessible technology, the Defendant has chosen to rely on an exclusively visual interface that provides no meaningful accommodations for screen-reader-users, says the suit. European Style Inc. owns and operates the website, https://www.paulgreenshoes.com, which offers handcrafted women's footwear for sale. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Ohrenberger, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (844) 731-3343 (716) 281-5496 E-mail: mohrenberger@ealg.law EVERLANE INC: Talley Misleading Email Suit Removed to W.D. Wash. ---------------------------------------------------------------- The case styled KATHLEEN TALLEY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. EVERLANE, INC., Defendant, Case No. 25-2-34173-9 SEA, was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on January 2, 2026. The Clerk of Court for the Western District of Washington assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-00007 to the proceeding. The case arises from Defendant's alleged violations of the Washington Commercial Electronic Mail Act and the Washington Consumer Protection Act. Everlane Inc. operates as a clothing retailer. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Daniel J. Emam, Esq. FENWICK & WEST LLP 401 Union St., 5th Floor Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 913-4318 E-mail: demam@fenwick.com - and - Molly Melcher, Esq. FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 E-mail: mmelcher@fenwick.com FIRST STUDENT: Removes Apodaca Suit to E.D. Calif. -------------------------------------------------- The Defendant in the case of MONICA APODACA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. FIRST STUDEN, INC.; FIRST STUDENT MANAGEMENT LLC; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants, filed a notice to remove the lawsuit from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Fresno (Case No. 25CECG05197) to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California on Dec. 30, 2025. The clerk of court for the Eastern District of California assigned Case No. 1:25-at-01454. First Student, Inc. provides bus transportation services. The Company offers students and schools a wide range of services such as full turnkey contracting. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: David J. Dow, Esq. Jocelyn D. Hannah, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 232-0441 Facsimile: (619) 232-4302 Email: ddow@littler.com jhannah@littler.com GALDERMA LABORATORIES: Albrigo Sues Over Mislabeled Sunscreens -------------------------------------------------------------- LAURA WILLIS ALBRIGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P., Defendant, Case No. 3:25-cv-03819-H-JLB (S.D. Cal., Dec. 30, 2025) seeks to redress and put a stop to the false, deceptive, and unlawful manner in which the Defendant has labeled, distributed, advertised, promoted, and marketed its sunscreen product "Cetaphil Sun Sheer Mineral Face Broad Spectrum SPF 50 Liquid Sunscreen." According to the complaint, on the Product's labeling, its outer packaging (the box), and in advertising and promotional materials for the Product, Defendant represents that the Product provides a sun protection factor that is far higher than the SPF that the Product actually provides, thereby deceiving consumers into believing that the Product offers better protection against sunburns and other dangerous effects of exposure to ultraviolet radiation (such as skin cancer and premature aging) than it actually provides, and that the Product is thus worth purchasing at a price higher than what is charged for other lower-SPF sunscreens. As the direct and proximate result of Defendant's false, deceptive, and misleading statements and omissions concerning the Product, as alleged herein, Plaintiff suffered economic injury by paying a premium for an inferior quality good and by being deprived of the full intended use of the Product and the full benefit of the bargain promised by Defendant, says the suit. Galderma Laboratories, LP provides dermatology and skin health services. The Company offers services for acne, rosaceas, onychomycosis, skin pigment disorder, skin cancer, and medical solutions for skin senescence. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Frank S. Hedin, Esq. HEDIN LLP 1395 Brickell Ave., Suite 610 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 357-2107 Facsimile: (305) 200-8801 E-mail: fhedin@hedinllp.com GOLDEN DRAGON: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Mendoza Alleges --------------------------------------------------------- PABLO ALVARADO MENDOZA, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. GOLDEN DRAGON KITCHEN INC. (D/B/A GOLDEN DRAGON CHINESE RESTAURANT); XING CHEN; LEO CHEN; and ANI CHEN, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-07128 (E.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Mendoza was employed by the Defendants as a delivery worker. Golden Dragon Kitchen Inc. owns and operates a Chinese food restaurant, located at Astoria, NY 11106, under the name "Golden Dragon Chinese Restaurant". [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Faillace, Esq. MICHAEL FAILLACE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 4510 New York, NY 10165 Telephone: (212) 317-1200 Facsimile: (212) 317-1620 HUEL INC: Leonard Sues Over Mislabeled Ready to Drink Shakes ------------------------------------------------------------ SCOTT LEONARD; JULIAN LYONS; MATTHEW MACKWOOD; MILES MAUESBY; and ROBERT PIETRAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. HUEL, INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-07141-MKB-PK (E.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2025) alleges violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, the Defendant is engaged in unfair and deceptive business practice of marketing and selling certain protein powder products that contain or risk containing significant levels of heavy metals, specifically, lead and cadmium, despite affirmatively misrepresenting otherwise. The products at issue are Defendant's Huel Black Edition protein powder and Ready-to-Drink shakes. The Plaintiffs and the Class would not have purchased, and at a minimum would not have paid the same price for, the Defendant's Products had Defendant disclosed the risk and presence of dangerous contaminants in its Products, says the suit. Huel Inc. operates as a specialty online retailer. The Company offers nutritionally complete food that contains a balance of all essential vitamins and minerals, protein, essential fats, carbs, fiber, and phytonutrients in a single product. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Christian Levis, Esq. LOWEY DANNENBERG, P.C. 44 South Broadway, Suite 1100 White Plains, NY 10601 Telephone: (914) 997-0500 Facsimile: (914) 997-0035 Email: clevis@lowey.com - and - Anthony M. Christina, Esq. LOWEY DANNENBERG, P.C. One Tower Bridge 100 Front Street, Suite 520 West Conshohocken, PA 19428 Telephone: (215) 399-4770 Facsimile: (914) 997-0035 Email: achristina@lowey.com - and - Edward F. Haber, Esq. Ian J. McLoughlin, Esq. Emilie Castro-Schwarz, Esq. SHAPIRO HABER & URMY LLP One Boston Place, Suite 2600 Boston, MA 02108 Telephone: (617) 439-3939 Facsimile: (617) 439-0134 Email: ehaber@shulaw.com imcloughlin@shulaw.com ecastronschwarz@shulaw.com JAJAJA WEST: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Galvez Alleges ------------------------------------------------------ DAVID DE LOS SANTOS GALVEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. JAJAJA WEST VILLAGE LLC (d/b/a JAJAJA PLANTAS MEXICANAS); JAJAJA HUDSON YARD LLC. (d/b/a JAJAJA PLANTAS MEXICANAS); KOOROSH BAKHTIAR; and NIMA GAROS, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-10730 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 29, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Galvez was employed by the Defendants as a cook. Jajaja West Village LLC d/b/a Jajaja Plantas Mexicanas operates a chain of Mexican restaurants. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Faillace, Esq. MICHAEL FAILLACE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 4510 New York, NY 10165 Telephone: (212) 317-1200 JRK RESIDENTIAL: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Castleberry Alleges --------------------------------------------------------------- ELISHA-BA CASTLEBERRY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. JRK RESIDENTIAL GROUP, INC. d/b/a TWO COAST LIVING, Defendants, Case No. 2:25-cv-12319 (C.D. Cal., Dec. 30, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendant unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Castleberry was employed by the Defendant as a staff. JRK Residential Group, Inc. is a privately-held company that operates in the real estate industry. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kevin J. Stoops, Esq. SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. 1801 Century Park E., Suite 860 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (248) 355-0300 Email: kstoops@sommerspc.com LEW THOMPSON: Removes Garcia Class Suit to E.D. Calif. ------------------------------------------------------ The Defendant in the case of ESTEBAN GARCIA, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff v. LEW THOMPSON & SON TRUCKING, INC.; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants, filed a notice to remove the lawsuit from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Stanislaus (Case No. CV-25-011324) to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California on Dec. 29, 2025. The clerk of court for the Eastern District of California assigned Case No. 1:25-at-01433. The case is assigned to Judge Dale A. Drozd and referred to Magistrate Magistrate Chi Soo Kim. Lew Thompson & Son Trucking is a poultry transportation company, engaged in hauling poultry from farm to table. [BN] The Defendants are represented by: James E. Hart, Esq. Alejandra Gallegos, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 18565 Jamboree Road Suite 800 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: (949) 705-3000 Facsimile: (949) 724-1201 Email: jhart@littler.com agallegos@littler.com LUXOTTICA OF AMERICA: Faces Moore Suit for Invasion of Privacy -------------------------------------------------------------- BRANDON MOORE, DANIEL ALDANA, and HOPE KAMBICK, as individuals, on behalf of themselves, the general public, and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. LUXOTTICA OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant, Case No. 3:25-cv-10840-SK (N.D. Cal., December 19, 2025) arises from the Defendant's egregious privacy violation and total breach of consumer trust in violation of California's Constitution and the California Invasion of Privacy Act. When Plaintiffs and other consumers visit Defendant's websites, the Defendant displays to them a popup cookie consent banner, each of which differs slightly in appearance across the websites, but each of which is substantially similar to the others in content and function. The Defendant's cookie banner on each website discloses that the website uses cookies but expressly gives users the option to control how they are tracked and how their personal data is used. The Defendant designed the websites to include resources and programming scripts from third parties that cause those parties to place cookies and other similar tracking technologies on visitors' browsers and devices and/or transmit cookies along with user data. However, unlike other websites, the Defendant's websites offer consumers a choice to browse without being tracked, followed, and targeted by third party data brokers and advertisers. But Defendant's promises are outright lies, designed to lull users into a false sense of security, asserts the complaint. Even after users elect to "REJECT" cookies, or specifically "opt out" of all cookies that sell or share users' personal information by way of the privacy preferences window, the Defendant surreptitiously causes several third parties -- including Adobe, Inc., Google LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc., LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., X Corp, Wunderkind Corporation, and others -- to place and/or transmit cookies that track users' website browsing activities and eavesdrop on users' private communications on the Websites, the complaint adds. The complaint alleges that the Defendant falsely told users of the websites that it respected their privacy and that they could avoid tracking and data sharing when they browsed the websites. Despite receiving notice of consumers' express declination of consent, the Defendant defied it and violated state statutes, and tort duties owed to Plaintiffs and those similarly situated users of the websites, the suit says. Luxottica of America, Inc. offers prescription glasses and sunglasses. The Company offers premium, luxury, and sports eyewear, while also providing a managed care package that includes medical and dental insurance. Luxottica of America serves customers through a retail network throughout North America.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Seth A. Safier, Esq. Marie A. McCrary, Esq. Todd Kennedy, Esq. GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 639-9090 Facsimile: (415) 449-6469 E-mail: seth@gutridesafier.com marie@gutridesafier.com todd@gutridesafier.com MEHRI & SKALET: Fails to Secure Personal Info, Ti Ng Suit Says -------------------------------------------------------------- TI NG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiff v. MEHRI & SKALET, PLLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-04452 (D.D.C., December 19, 2025) is a class action seeking redress for the Defendant's unlawful and negligent disclosure of Plaintiff and other clients' personally identifiable information in a massive data breach on December 17, 2024, in violation of common law and in breach of express and implied contract. The Plaintiff and other Class Members are individuals and current and former clients of Defendant who either entrusted or had their personally identifiable information held by M&S. However, the Defendant betrayed Plaintiff's trust by failing to properly safeguard and protect her PII and by disclosing her PII to cybercriminals, the complaint says. For the rest of their lives, the Plaintiff and the Class Members will bear an immediate and heightened risk of all manners of identity theft, adds the complaint. The Plaintiff has incurred and will continue to incur damages in the form of, inter alia, loss of privacy and/or the additional damages. Accordingly, the Plaintiff brings this action as a direct and/or proximate result of the data breach. Mehri & Skalet, PLLC is a law firm located in Washington, DC, and provides legal representation for employment law, civil rights, insurance & health, sports law, and consumer protection cases.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: David K. Lietz, Esq. MILBERG PLLC 5335 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 440   Washington, DC 20015   Telephone: (866) 252-0878 E-mail: dlietz@milberg.com - and - William B. Federman, Esq. FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 10205 N. Pennsylvania Ave Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Telephone: (405) 235-1560 E-mail: wbf@federmanlaw.com MEJURI (US) INC: Proveyer Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website -------------------------------------------------------------- NESTOR A. PROVEYER, Plaintiff v. MEJURI (US), INC., a Foreign Profit Corporation D/B/A MEJURI, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-25995 (S.D. Fla., December 19, 2025) is a class action brought by the Plaintiff, on behalf of others similarly situated blind and visually disabled individuals, under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff attempted to purchase a bracelet on Defendant's website at https://mejuri.com. However, the Plaintiff was not able to freely and fully use Defendant's website because it contains access barriers that make it inaccessible to persons with disabilities, and for which there is no reasonable accommodation for the Plaintiff. The complaint alleges that Defendant's website contains access barriers that prevent free and full use by blind and visually disabled individuals using keyboards and available screen reader software. Mejuri (US), Inc. operates the website that manufactures and markets jewelry.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Diego German Mendez, Esq. MENDEZ LAW OFFICES, PLLC P.O. Box 228630 Miami, FL 33172 Telephone: (305) 264-9090 Facsimile: (305) 809-8474 - and - Richard J. Adams, Esq. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 6500 Cowpen Road, Suite 101 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Telephone: (786) 290-1963 Facsimile: (305) 824-3868 E-mail: radamslaw7@gmail.com MICROSOFT CORP: Garcia Sues Over Data Privacy Violations -------------------------------------------------------- MICHAEL GARCIA; SALENA GARCIA; and R.G., a minor by and through her guardians Michael Garcia and Salena Garcia, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION; MOJANG AB, and DOES 1-10, Defendants, Case No. 3:25-cv-11078-SK (N.D. Cal., Jan 2, 2026) alleges violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, Defendants Microsoft Corporation and Mojang AB secretly instrumented Minecraft-branded properties with tracking technologies -- including session-replay, keystroke and mouse-movement logging, device fingerprinting, and embedded analytics and video integrations -- that intercept, record, and transmit the contents of users' communications and detailed behavioral data in real time. The Defendants do not obtain valid, informed, prior consent from all parties to these communications before intercepting and duplicating them, and they do not clearly or prominently disclose that Minecraft-related properties are wired with technologies that function as modern eavesdropping devices, asserts the suit. Microsoft Corporation operates as a software company. The Company offers applications, extra cloud storage, and advanced security solutions. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Morgan D. Ross, Esq. Robert B. Salgado, Esq. COUNTERPOINT LEGAL 600 B Street, Ste 1550 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 780-3303 Facsimile: (619) 344-0332 Email: morgan@counterpointfirm.com rsalgado@counterpointfirm.com MITO FORT: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Lopez Suit Alleges -------------------------------------------------------- MOISES BATEN LOPEZ; and JOSE VENTURA GUARCAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. MITO FORT GREENE LLC d/b/a MITO; and HONGMEI TENG, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-07137 (E.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Plaintiffs were employed by the Defendants as food preparers. Mito Fort Greene LLC d/b/a Mito operates a restaurant in New York. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Roman Avshalumov, Esq. HELEN F. DALTON & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 80-02 Kew Gardens Road, Suite 601 Kew Gardens, NY 11415 Telephone: (718) 263-9591 MONSANTO COMPANY: Hester Sues Over Wrongful Sale of Herbicide ------------------------------------------------------------- John Hester, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N25C-12-491 MON (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 17, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Hickerson Sues Over Negligent Herbicide Sale -------------------------------------------------------------- Larry Hickerson, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N25C-12-498 MON (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 17, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Hicks Sues Over Wrongful Advertising and Sale --------------------------------------------------------------- Richard Hicks, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N25C-12-497 MON (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 17, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Hidalgo Sues Over Negligent Sale of Herbicide --------------------------------------------------------------- Araceli Hidalgo, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N25C-12-512 MON (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 17, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Horn Sues Over Wrongful Distribution of Herbicide ------------------------------------------------------------------- Jack Van Horn, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N25C-12-495 MON (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 17, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Ritter Sues Over Negligent Advertising and Sale ----------------------------------------------------------------- Sharon Ritter, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N25C-12-534 MON (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 17, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Van Zeeland Sues Over Wrongful Herbicide Sale --------------------------------------------------------------- Robin Van Zeeland, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N25C-12-493 MON (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 17, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Webking Sues Over Negligent Advertising and Sale ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cynthia Webking, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N25C-12-523 MON (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 17, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Werth Sues Over Wrongful Herbicide Distribution ----------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Werth, and other similarly situated victims v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Case No. N25C-12-504 MON (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 17, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Roundup containing the active ingredient glyphosate and the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine ("POEA"), as well as many, many other proven, probable, and/or suspected carcinogens. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup. The Defendants advertise and sell goods, specifically Roundup, throughout the United States, including in Delaware.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com NAHGA INC: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Rich Suit Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------- AMBER RICH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. NAHGA, INC. d/b/a NAHGA CLAIM SERVICES, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-00645-KFW (D. Me., Dec. 26, 2025) is a class action arising out of the Defendant's failures to properly secure, safeguard, encrypt, and timely and adequately destroy Plaintiff's and Class members' sensitive personal identifiable information that it had acquired and stored for its business purposes. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, due to the Defendant's data security failures which resulted in the Data Breach, cybercriminals were able to target Defendant's computer systems and exfiltrate highly sensitive and personally identifiable information and protected health information belonging to Plaintiff and Class members. As a result of this Data Breach, he Plaintiff's and Class members' Private Information was compromised and stolen and remains in the hands of those cybercriminals. The Data Breach was a direct result of Defendant's failure to implement adequate and reasonable cybersecurity procedures and protocols necessary to protect Plaintiff's and Class members' Private Information with which it was entrusted for either treatment or employment or both, says the suit. NAHGA, Inc. d/b/a NAHGA Claim Services is a third-party administrator (TPA) specializing in managing pension, retirement, health, and welfare funds, and processing medical claims. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: David E. Bauer, Esq. 443 Saint John Street Portland, ME 04102 Telephone: (207) 804-6296 Email: David.edward.bauer@gmail.com - and - Daniel Srourian, Esq. SROURIAN LAW FIRM, P.C. 468 N. Camden Dr. Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Telephone: (213) 474-3800 Facsimile: (213) 471-4160 Email: daniel@slfla.com NOAH HODGIN: Bid to Compel Arbitration in Isagenix Suit OK'd ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Isagenix International LLC, et al., v. Noah Hodgin, Case No. 2:25-cv-01587-DGC (D. Ariz.), the Hon. Judge Campbell entered an order as follows 1. Hodgin's Motion to Dismiss the Petition is denied. 2. The Motion to Compel Arbitration is granted. The parties shall arbitrate Hodgin's individual claims in accordance with the Arbitration Provision . 3. Isagenix's request for attorneys' fees and costs is denied. 4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this matter. 5. The California Class Action is not pending in this Court, and its status therefore will not be addressed by this judge. The Court says that Hodgin fails to satisfy any of the requirements of § 187(2)(b). He has not shown that California law would be chosen under section 188, that application of Arizona unconscionability law would undermine a fundamental policy of California law, or that California has a materially greater interest in this case than Arizona. Because none of the factors in section 187(2)(b) have been shown to apply, the Agreement's choice of Arizona law will be enforced by the Court. The Court is not persuaded by Hodgin's argument that the Arbitration Provision is unconscionable because it does not require an arbitrator familiar with the state law governing the arbitration, creating the possibility that the arbitrator may "substitute industry customs for actual law." Isagenix is a network marketing company. It sells health-related products. Noah Hodgin resides in California. He has a high school education and obtained a certification in health and wellness from the Spencer Institute. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 30, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=fWC0XX at no extra charge.[CC] O'REILLY AUTO: Class Certification Deadline Continuation Sought --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as NOAH MCMILLON and JOHN PLUMLEE, behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. O'REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES, INC and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No. 3:25-cv-00711-CAB-SBC (S.D. Cal.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order continuing the operative case deadlines as follows: Deadline / Action Proposed Date The Plaintiffs' deadline to file April 20, 2026 class certification motion: The Defendant's deadline to file June 22, 2026 opposition to the Plaintiffs' class certification motion: The Plaintiffs' deadline to file reply July 22, 2026 brief in support of class certification motion: Fact discovery deadline: July 29, 2026 Supplemental Expert List Due: Sept. 9, 2026 Expert Disclosures: OCt. 7, 2026 Expert Discovery Deadline: Nov. 18, 2026 Pre-Trial Motion Deadline: Dec. 16, 2026 Daubert Motion Deadline: Dec. 16, 2026 O'Reilly owns and operates retail auto parts stores. A copy of the Parties' motion dated Dec. 31, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=DqArtg at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Nicholas J. Ferraro, Esq. Lauren N. Vega, Esq. Xavier L. Woodford FERRARO VEGA EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS, INC. 3333 Camino del Rio South, Suite 300 4 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (619) 693-7727 Facsimile: (619) 350-6855 E-mail: nick@ferrarovega.com lauren@ferrarovega.com xavier@ferrarovega.com - and - Isam C. Khoury, Esq. Maggie K. Realin, Esq. COHELAN KHOURY & SINGER 605 C Street, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 595-3001 Facsimile: (619) 595-3000 E-mail: ikhoury@ckslaw.com mrealin@ckslaw.com - and - David R. Markham, Esq. Lisa R. Brevard, Esq. THE MARKHAM LAW FIRM 888 Prospect Street, Suite 200 La Jolla, CA 92037 Telephone: (619) 399-3995 Facsimile: (619) 323-1684 E-mail: dmarkham@markham-law.com lbrevard@markham-law.com The Defendants are represented by: James M. Peterson, Esq. Edwin M. Boniske, Esq. HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP 401 West A Street, Suite 2600 San Diego, CA 92101-7910 Telephone: (619) 236-1551 Facsimile: (619) 696-1410 E-mail: peterson@higgslaw.com boniske@higgslaw.com ONITY GROUP: Bid to Certify Class Tossed ---------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Estate of Albert L. Smit et al v. Onity Group Inc. et al., Case No. 6:25-cv-00341 (E.D. Okla., Filed Sept. 25, 2025), the Hon. Judge D. Edward Snow entered an order denying motion to certify class in light of Plaintiff's pending independent lawsuit. The nature of suit states Real Property -- All Other Real Property. Onity is a provider of residential and commercial mortgage loan servicing, special servicing, and asset management services.[CC] OSF HEALTHCARE: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Blum Suit Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------ STEVEN BLUM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-15722 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 29, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendant unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Blum was employed by the Defendant as a respiratory therapist. OSF Healthcare System provides health care services. The Company manages a network of hospitals, clinics, and physicians for the provision of emergency care, women's health, cancer care, cardiac services, neurosciences, and pediatric services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael L. Fradin, Esq. 8401 Crawford Ave. Ste. 104 Skokie, IL 60076 Telephone: (847) 986-5889 Facsimile: (847) 673-1228 Email: mike@fradinlaw.com - and - James L. Simon, Esq. SIMON LAW CO. 11 1/2 N. Franklin Street Chagrin Falls, OH 44022 Telephone: (216) 816-8696 Email: james@simonsayspay.com PBIGROUP INC: Web Site Not Accessible to the Blind, Ford Says ------------------------------------------------------------- SANDRA FORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PBIGROUP, INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-15726 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 29, 2025) alleges violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant's Web site, https://hempz.com, is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, including the Plaintiff, in violation of the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Web site will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. PBIGroup, Inc. is in the business of manufacturing of perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Ohrenberger, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (844) 731-3343 Email: mohrenberger@ealg.law PREMIER MAGNESIA: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Helton Alleges ----------------------------------------------------------- MELISSA HELTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PREMIER MAGNESIA, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-02633 (D. Nev., Dec. 31, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendant unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant as a laborer. Premier Magnesia LLC provides magnesia based products and solutions. The Company caters agricultural, industrial, and water treatment markets. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Esther C. Rodriguez, Esq. RODRIGUEZ LAW OFFICES, P.C. 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Telephone: (702) 320-8400 Facsimile: (702) 320-8401 Email: info@rodriguezlaw.com - and - Kathryn Penick, Esq. JOSEPHSON DUNLAP LLP 11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 3050 Houston, TX 77046 Telephone: (713) 352-1100 Facsimile: (713) 352-3300 Email: kpenick@mybackwages.com PRENTKE ROMICH: Jackson Seeks Final Approval of Class Settlement ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as CHRISTINA JACKSON, on behalf of her minor child, J.L., and CINDY WESTMAN, on behalf of her minor child, Z.R., and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. PRENTKE ROMICH COMPANY d/b/a PRC SALTILLO, Case No. 5:24-cv-01708-CAB (N.D. Ohio), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order granting final approval of a proposed class action settlement consisting of a $632,250.00 non-reversionary common fund. The Plaintiffs consulted with Defendant before filing this Motion and determined that this Motion is unopposed. Prentke provides application software. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated Dec. 30, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=0l79fc at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Tyler J. Bean, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 New York, NY 10151 Telephone: (212) 532-1091 E-mail: tbean@sirillp.com - and - Terence R. Coates, Esq. MARKOVITS, STOCK & DEMARCO, LLC 119 East Court Street, Suite 530 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Telephone: (513) 651-3700 Facsimile: (513) 665-0219 E-mail: tcoates@msdlegal.com - and - William B. Federman, Esq. FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 10205 North Pennsylvania Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Telephone: (405) 235-1560 E-mail: wbf@federmanlaw.com PRESTIGE INT'L: Rodriguez Class Cert Bid Tossed as Moot ------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Rodriguez v. Prestige International Insurance Group, Inc. et al., Case No. 0:25-cv-61572 (S.D. Fla., Filed Aug. 4, 2025), the Hon. Judge Patrick M Hunt entered an order denying as moot motion to certify class. The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Prestige is an Insurance company.[CC] PUTNAM COUNTY, IN: Mitchell Seeks to Recover Unpaid Wages --------------------------------------------------------- BENJAMIN R. MITCHELL, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PUTNAM COUNTY, INDIANA, Defendant, Case No. 2:26-cv-00002-JRS-MJD (S.D. Ind., January 2, 2026) seeks to address Defendant's class-wide wage and hour and overtime violations against the Plaintiff and his fellow Putnam County Highway Department coworkers. The Plaintiff was employed as an equipment operator by the Putnam County Highway Department. He was hired on May 14, 2018 and worked until he was wrongfully terminated on November 20, 2025. Allegedly, Putnam County has been systematically underpaying wages and overtime wages to Plaintiff and similarly situated hourly paid Highway Department workers. In addition, Putnam County automatically deducted 30 minutes each work shift from Mitchell and his fellow Highway Department coworkers' recorded hours of work, even though no bona fide meal period of any kind was provided and Putnam County kept no record whatsoever of the duration (start and stop time) of any meal break or even a record of whether or not an employee received a bona fide meal break, asserts the suit. Putnam County is an Indiana county government and it operates the Putnam County Highway Department in Putnam County, Indiana. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Robert P. Kondras, Jr. HASSLER KONDRAS MILLER LLP 100 Cherry Street Terre Haute, IN 47807 Telephone: (812) 232-9691 Facsimile: (812) 234-2881 E-mail: kondras@hkmlawfirm.com RARE BEAUTY: Talley Suit Removed to W.D. Washington --------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Kathleen Talley, individually and on behalf of the proposed class v. RARE BEAUTY LLC; DOE LICENSEES 1-5, inclusive, Case No. 25-2-34184-4 SEA was removed from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on Dec. 31, 2025, and assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-02749. The Plaintiff alleges Rare Beauty violated Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”) and Washington’s Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”) when it sent marketing emails to Washington residents with allegedly false and misleading subject lines.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Lauren J. Tsuji, Esq. Thomas J. Tobin, Esq. Hannah Parman, Esq. PERKINS COIE LLP 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 4200 Seattle, WA 98101-3804 Phone +1.206.359.8000 Facsimile +1.206.359.9000 Email: LTsuji@perkinscoie.com TTobin@perkinscoie.com HParman@perkinscoie.com RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES: Bid to Extend Class Cert Deadline Sought --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Timmieo Curry, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Raytheon Bargaining Retirement Plan; Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Case No. 4:22-cv-00129-JAS (D. Ariz.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order extending the deadline to file a motion for class certification from Jan.16, 2026 until the later of: (a) 45 days following the order on the pending Motion to Compel, or (b) 45 days following the Defendants' production of documents that are the subject of that motion if the Court grants the Motion in whole or in part. The Plaintiff has a pending motion to compel discovery related to class certification and for the reasons set forth therein, Plaintiff believes he needs the discovery to move for class certification. The Defendants' counsel stated that they do not oppose the requested extension. The Defendants' counsel also stated that they do not agree with the Plaintiff's characterizations regarding the discovery or the conferral process. Raytheon is an American multinational aerospace and defense conglomerate. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Dec. 31, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=4LFvlN at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Susan Martin, Esq. Jennifer Kroll, Esq. Michael M. Licata, Esq. MARTIN & BONNETT, P.L.L.C. 4647 N. 32nd Street, Suite 185 Phoenix, AZ 85018 Telephone: (602) 240-6900 E-mail: smartin@martinbonnett.com jkroll@martinbonnett.com mlicata@martinbonnett.com REGAL CINEMAS INC: Bozanich Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ----------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Daniel Bozanich and Porfirio Garza, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. REGAL CINEMAS, INC., a foreign profit corporation; and DOES, as yet unknown Washington entities, Case No. 25-2-35417-2 was removed from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on Dec. 30, 2025, and assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-02724. The Complaint asserts causes of action against Defendant on behalf of Plaintiffs and the putative class for “its failure to: provide compliant meal and rest periods; to compensate for missed and noncompliant meal and rest periods; and to furnish accurate wage statements.” As a result of these alleged wage and hour violations, Plaintiffs seek damages for missed breaks, damages for unpaid break time, damages for Defendant’s alleged failure to furnish accurate wage statements, double damages under RCW.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Timothy W. Emery, Esq. Patrick B. Reddy, Esq. Paul Cipriani, Esq. Hannah M. Hamley, Esq. EMERY REDDY PLLC 600 Stewart St., Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206.442.9106 Email: emeryt@emeryreddy.com reddyp@emeryreddy.com paul@emeryreddy.com hannah@emeryreddy.com The Defendants are represented by: Patrick M. Madden, Esq. Ryan J. Groshong, Esq. Benjamin Moore, Esq. ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP 1420 5th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 288-0110 Email: Patrick.Madden@arnoldporter.com Ryan.Groshong@arnoldporter.com Ben.Moore@arnoldporter.com ROBERT LUNA: Stewart Allowed to Seal Certain Exhibits ----------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Kevin Stewart et al., v. Robert Luna et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-04641-ODW-ADS (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Otis D. Wright, II, entered an order granting the application to seal Exhibits 1 through 10, filed in connection with the Plaintiffs' renewed motion for class certification. The Clerk will not convert the proposed sealed document submitted with the Application into a new filing. The Plaintiffs shall comply with this directive within three (3) court days. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 30, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=p1KvZ3 at no extra charge.[CC] ROYAL CARIBBEAN: Perry Consumer Suit Removed to W.D. Wash. ---------------------------------------------------------- The case styled LORI ANN PERRY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD. d/b/a ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP, a Liberian corporation, Defendant, Case No. 25-2-35030-4 SEA, was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on January 2, 2026. The Clerk of Court for the Western District of Washington assigned Case No. 2:26-cv-00004 to the proceeding. The case arises from Defendant's alleged violations of the Washington Commercial Electronic Mail Act and the Washington Consumer Protection Act. Headquartered in Miami, Florida, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. offers cruise deals and packages. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Lauren B. Rainwater, Esq. Rachel Herd, Esq. Bryan Taylor, Esq. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 Telephone: (206) 622-3150 Facsimile: (206) 757-7700 E-mail: laurenrainwater@dwt.com rachelherd@dwt.com bryantaylor@dwt.com SABOR LATINO: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Baez Suit Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------- FLERIDA MARIA MARTINEZ BAEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. SABOR LATINO GROCERY CORP.; JOSE RODRIGUEZ; and VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-07129 (E.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Baez was employed by the Defendants as a kitchen staff. Sabor Latino Grocery Corp. owns and operates a restaurant in New York. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Roman Avshalumov, Esq. HELEN F. DALTON & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 80-02 Kew Gardens Road, Suite 601 Kew Gardens, NY 11415 Telephone: (718) 263-9591 SALESFORCE INC: De La Espada Suit Transferred to N.D. Illinois -------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Yajaira De La Espada, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Salesforce, Inc., Transunion LLC, Case No. 3:25-cv-09020 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on Dec. 31, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:25-cv-15748 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Personal Property. Salesforce, Inc. -- https://www.salesforce.com/ap/ -- is an American cloud-based software company headquartered in San Francisco, California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Dena C. Sharp, Esq. Adam E. Polk, Esq. GIRARD SHARP LLP 601 California Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94108 Phone: (415) 981-4800 Fax: (415) 981-4846 Email: dsharp@girardsharp.com apolk@girardsharp.com - and - James E. Cecchi, Esq. Jason H. Alperstein, Esq. Jordan M. Steele, Esq. Kevin G. Cooper, Esq. CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI BRODY & AGNELLO PC 5 Becker Farm Road, 2nd Floor Roseland, NJ 07068 Phone: (973) 994-1700 Fax: (973) 994-1744 Email: jcecchi@carellabyrne.com jalperstein@carellabyrne.com jsteele@carellabyrne.com kcooper@carellabyrne.com The Defendant is represented by: Tiffany Cheung, Esq. Michelle Sosa-Acosta, Esq. MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: (415) 268-7000 Email: tcheung@mofo.com MSosaAcosta@mofo.com - and - Katie Viggiani, Esq. MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 250 West 55th Street New York, NY 10019 Phone: (212) 468-8000 Email: kviggiani@mofo.com - and - Sydney Dianne Gaskins, Esq. MORRISON FOERSTER LLP 707 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 6000 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (213) 892-5599 Email: sgaskins@mofo.com - and - William Elliott Ridgway, Esq. SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 320 S. Canal St., Ste. 47th Floor Chicago, IL 60606-5707 Phone: (312) 407-0700 Fax: (312) 407-0711 Email: william.ridgway@skadden.com SAM'S EXCAVATING: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Gilliam Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------ TYLER GILLIAM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. SAM'S EXCAVATING UNLIMITED, INC.; and WILLIAM CLINE, Defendants, Case No. 2:25-cv-01514-EAS-KAJ (S.D. Ohio, Dec. 29, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Gilliam was employed by the Defendants as a laborer. Sam's Excavating Unlimited, Inc. is an excavation contractor, specializing in both residential and commercial projects. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Stephan I. Voudris, Esq. VOUDRIS LAW LLC 8401 Chagrin Road, Suite 8 Chagrin Falls, OH 44023 Telephone: (440) 543-0670 Facsimile: (440) 543-0721 Email: svoudris@voudrislaw.com SANFORD SURROUNDED: Class Cert. Bid Filing Extended to June 16 -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as TRACIE FOXWORTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. SANFORD SURROUNDED LLC, EXP REALTY LLC, and EXP REALTY OF SOUTHEAST NC, LLC, Case No. (M.D.N.C.), the Hon. Judge Joi Elizabeth Peake entered an order extending scheduling order deadlines as follows: Event Deadline The Plaintiff's expert disclosures and reports: March 24, 2026 The Defendants' expert disclosures and reports: April 21, 2026 Close of Discovery: May 25, 2026 The Plaintiff's motion for class certification: June 16, 2026 The Defendants' response in opposition to the July 14, 2026 Plaintiff's motion for class certification: Sanford is a veteran owned real estate firm serving Sanford and the surrounding areas. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 31, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=oVTJkZ at no extra charge.[CC] SAYSH CORP: Website Inaccessible to the Blind, Pittman Suit Claims ------------------------------------------------------------------ DEBBIE PITTMAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Saysh Corporation, Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-00015 (N.D. Ill., January 2, 2026) arises from Defendant's failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired individuals. The Plaintiff browsed and intended to make an online purchase of sneakers on Defendant's website. Despite her efforts, however, the Plaintiff was denied a shopping experience like that of a sighted individual due to the website's lack of a variety of features and accommodations, says the suit. Accordingly, the Plaintiff seeks redress for Defendant's discriminatory conduct and asserts claims for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Headquartered in Los Angeles, CA, Saysh Corporation owns and operates the website, https://saysh.com, which sells women's footwear and apparel. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Ohrenberger, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (844) 731-3343 (716) 281-5496 E-mail: mohrenberger@ealg.law SERENITY PATH RECOVERY: Ibarra Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Serenity Path Recovery Inc. The case is styled as Yesenia Vanessa Ibarra, on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Serenity Path Recovery Inc., Vahe Arabyan, Case No. 25STCV38127 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., Dec. 30, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Serenity Path Recovery -- https://serenitypathrecovery.com/ -- is a luxury addiction treatment center offering personalized programs and holistic care in California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Steven Azizi, Esq. MIRACLE MILE LAW GROUP 750 N San Vicente Blvd., RW1000 Los Angeles, CA 90069 Phone: 213-433-3588 Fax: 888-224-4132 Email: steven@miraclemilelaw.com SHINESTY INC: Youngren Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ----------------------------------------------------------- Dustin Youngren, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Shinesty, Inc., Case No. 1:25-cv-15751 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 30, 2025), is brought against Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its Website https://www.shinesty.com/ (hereinafter “Website” or “the Website”) to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually impaired individuals. The Defendant is denying blind and visually impaired individuals throughout the United States equal access to the goods and services the Defendant provides to their non-disabled customers through the Website. The Defendant’s denial of full and equal access to its Website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered, and in conjunction with its physical locations, is a violation of the Plaintiff’s rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”). Because the Defendant’s Website is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant’s policies, practices, and procedures to that Defendant’s Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. This complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using the computer. The Defendant provides to the public the Website, which provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including, the ability to purchase a variety of bold and quirky apparel including fun-print men’s and women’s underwear, swimwear, matching sets, themed holiday suits and dresses, loungewear, novelty outerwear and accessories.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: David B. Reyes, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Phone: (630)-478-0856 Email: Dreyes@ealg.law SKRATCH LABS: Web Site Not Accessible to the Blind, Hampton Says ---------------------------------------------------------------- TAMMY HAMPTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. SKRATCH LABS, LLC, Defendant, Case: 1:25-cv-15740 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 30, 2025) alleges violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant's Web site, https://www.skratchlabs.com, is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, including the Plaintiff, in violation of the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Web site will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. Skratch Labs LLC manufactures nutritional food products. The Company offers hydration and recovery mixes, sport crispy rice cakes, superfuel drink mix, energy bars and chews, packs, cookbooks, gears, accessories, and gift cards. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (844) 731-3343 Facsimile: (929) 442-2154 Email: Achan@ealg.law SLED DISTRIBUTION: Cerkezoglu Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Deborah Cerkezoglu, on her own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated v. SLED DISTRIBUTION, LLC, d/b/a MY MEDIC, Case No. 25-2-00678-14 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington for the County of Grays Harbor, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on Dec. 31, 2025, and assigned Case No. 3:25-cv-06189. While Defendant disputes these allegations, the Plaintiff has brought this action on behalf of a putative class, which she alleges contains thousands of members. According to the allegations in the complaint, each of the members of the putative class received emails from Sled that Plaintiff alleges violate Washington consumer protection laws and carry a penalty of $500 per violation.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Amit D. Ranade, Esq. Benjamin C. Woodruff, Esq. SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 600 University Street, Suite 310 Seattle, WA 98101-3122 Phone: 206.741.1420 Eamil: aranade@swlaw.com SNOW COMMERCE: Calcano Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ----------------------------------------------------------- Marcos Calcano, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated v. SNOW COMMERCE LLC, Case No. 1:25-cv-10806 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 31, 2025), is brought against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered thereby, is a violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Because Defendant's interactive website, https://shop.drseuss.com, including all portions thereof or accessed thereon (collectively, the "Website" or "Defendant's Website"), is not equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. By failing to make its Website available in a manner compatible with computer screen reader programs, Defendant deprives blind and visually-impaired individuals the benefits of its online goods, content, and services--all benefits it affords nondisabled individuals--thereby increasing the sense of isolation and stigma among those persons that Title III was meant to redress, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using his computer. SNOW COMMERCE LLC, operates the Shop Dr. Seuss online retail store, as well as the Shop Dr. Seuss interactive Website and advertises, markets, and operates in the State of New York and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, N.Y. 10003-2461 Phone: (212) 228-9795 Fax: (212) 982-6284 Email: Michael@Gottlieb.legal Jeffrey@gottlieb.legal Danalgottlieb@aol.com SOFI SECURITIES: Shah Suit Removed to N.D. California ----------------------------------------------------- Vishal Shah, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. SOFI SECURITIES LLC, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No. CGC-25-625503 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco, to the United States District Court for Northern District of California on Dec. 31, 2025, and assigned Case No. 3:25-cv-11130. On October 22, 2025, Plaintiff filed the Action to initiate proceedings in state court (the “State Court Action”). On December 1, 2025, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Chase via an authorized agent for service. Accordingly, Chase has timely filed this Notice of Removal within 30 days of service.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Alicia A. Baiardo, Esq. MCGUIREWOODS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 201 Clay Street Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 844-9944 Facsimile: (415) 844-9922 Email: abaiardo@mcguirewoods.com - and - Molly M. White, Esq. MCGUIREWOODS LLP 1800 Century Park East, 8th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-1501 Phone: (310) 315-8200 Facsimile: (310) 315-8210 Email: mwhite@mcguirewoods.com SOUL INSOLE: Calcano Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website --------------------------------------------------------- Marcos Calcano, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated v. SOUL INSOLE INC., Case No. 1:25-cv-10808 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 31, 2025), is brought against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered thereby, is a violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Because Defendant's interactive website, https://soulinsole.com, including all portions thereof or accessed thereon (collectively, the "Website" or "Defendant's Website"), is not equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. By failing to make its Website available in a manner compatible with computer screen reader programs, Defendant deprives blind and visually-impaired individuals the benefits of its online goods, content, and services--all benefits it affords nondisabled individuals--thereby increasing the sense of isolation and stigma among those persons that Title III was meant to redress, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using his computer. SOUL INSOLE INC., operates the Soul Insole online retail store, as well as the Soul Insole interactive Website and advertises, markets, and operates in the State of New York and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, N.Y. 10003-2461 Phone: (212) 228-9795 Fax: (212) 982-6284 Email: Michael@Gottlieb.legal Jeffrey@gottlieb.legal Danalgottlieb@aol.com SPF SCREENS: Wilson Seeks More Time to File Class Certification --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ERIN WILSON, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, v. SPF SCREENS & AWNINGS LLC, Case No. 1:25-cv-06575-MLB (N.D. Ga.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order extending the time to file motion for class certification The Plaintiff filed this Class Action Complaint, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act on behalf of a national class. The Plaintiff has conferred with counsel for the Defendant, who does not oppose this relief. SPF Screens manufactures and installs sun protection products. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Dec. 30, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=dCBhvN at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony I. Paronich, Esq. PARONICH LAW, P.C. 350 Lincoln Street, Suite 2400 Hingham, MA 02043 Telephone: (617) 485-0018 E-mail: anthony@paronichlaw.com SUBARU OF AMERICA: Court Narrows Claims in Robinson Suit -------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as KATELYN ROBINSON, et al., v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC., Case No. 1:24-cv-09334-KMW-EAP (D.N.J.), the Hon. Judge Williams entered an order granting Defendant's Motion, in part, and dismisses with prejudice: -- The Plaintiffs' claims for fraudulent concealment asserted under the laws of California and Utah (Count I, to the extent so pleaded); the Plaintiffs' unjust enrichment claims (Counts II–III); and the Plaintiff Brenner's SBA claim for breach of express warranty under California Civil Code section 1793.2(d)(2) (Count XII). -- The Motion is also granted as to Brenner's UCL claim (Count XV) to the extent it seeks monetary damages, and that aspect of the claim is likewise dismissed with prejudice. The remainder of the motion is denied. The Court finds that Brenner's allegations are sufficient to maintain a cause of action for breach of express warranty under UCC section 2-313. Accordingly, the Defendant's Motion is denied as to Count XI. The Plaintiffs seek to preserve an equitable claim as a fallback in the event their legal theories fail on the merits. That is not a basis to proceed on unjust enrichment where Plaintiffs have alleged legal claims seeking the same relief for the same alleged conduct. Accordingly, the Defendant's Motion is granted as to the Plaintiffs' unjust enrichment claims set forth in Count II. The Defendant's final argument concerns Chaidez’s Utah-law class claims for damages outside the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (UCSPA). The Defendant contends that, under Utah law, the UCSPA provides the exclusive avenue for class-wide damages relief, such that any non-UCSPA damages theories may not proceed on a class basis. This putative multistate class action arises from allegations that certain Subaru vehicles contain a defect in their side-view mirrors. The Plaintiffs each purchased or leased a Subaru vehicle in their respective home states—Alaska, California, Florida, Texas, and Utah. The Plaintiffs allege that, after taking possession and driving their vehicles, they discovered the side-view mirrors shake and vibrate while the vehicle is in motion, impairing visibility and creating a safety risk. The Defendant markets, distributes, and sells Subaru-branded vehicles in the United States through a network of authorized dealerships. A copy of the Court's opinion dated Dec. 31, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=3rbEKw at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Sergei Lemberg, Esq. LEMBERG LAW, LLC 43 Danbury Road Wilton, CT 06897 The Defendant is represented by: Neal D. Walters, Esq. Casey G. Watkins, Esq. Jordan L. Meyer, Esq. Kristen A. Petagna, Esq. BALLARD SPAHR LLP 700 East Gate Drive, Suite 330 Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054-0015 SWANSON HEALTH PRODUCTS: Card Files TCPA Suit in D. Kansas ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Swanson Health Products, Incorporated. The case is styled as Shawn Card, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated v. Swanson Health Products, Incorporated, Case No. 6:25-cv-01298 (D. Kan., Dec. 30, 2025). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Swanson Health Products (SHP) -- https://www.swansonvitamins.com/ -- is a natural health catalog and Internet marketing company headquartered in Fargo, North Dakota.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Elisabeth May Wilder, Esq. MARTIN PRINGLE OLIVER WALLACE & BAUER, LLP - WICHITA 645 East Douglas, Suite 100 Wichita, KS 67202 Phone: (620) 217-1810 Email: emwilder@martinpringle.com SYNGENTA CROP: Herbicide Contains Toxic Chemical, Brumfield Says ---------------------------------------------------------------- MARY BRUMFIELD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC; CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-640 PQT (Del. Sup., Dec. 29, 2025) is an action for damages suffered by the Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and sale of products containing the herbicide Paraquat, which causes Parkinson's disease in humans. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, the Defendants' Paraquat products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC produces fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, and seed care treatments, as well as farm management, seeds, and research and development services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com SYNOPSYS INC: City of Sterling Sues Over Drop in Share Price ------------------------------------------------------------ CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. SYNOPSYS, INC.; SASSINE GHAZI; SHELAGH GLASER; SUDHINDRA KANKANWADI; AART J. DE GEUS; LUIS BORGEN; MARC N. CASPER; JANICE D. CHAFFIN; BRUCE R. CHIZEN; MERCEDES JOHNSON; ROBERT G. PAINTER; JEANNINE P. SARGENT; JOHN G. SCHWARZ; and ROY VALLEE, Defendants, Case No. 5:25-cv-11059 (N.D. Cal., Dec. 30, 2025) alleges violation of the Securities Act of 1933. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendants presented materially false and misleading statements and omissions to investors regarding the Defendants' business operations, financial performance, and market conditions. Synopsys stock to fall by 35.8%, dropping from $604.37 to $387.78 per share on September 10, 2025. Shareholders who received Synopsys stock at an inflated price when the acquisition became effective were damaged as a result of the false and misleading statements in the acquisition Documents, says the suit. Synopsys, Inc. supplies electronic design automation solutions to the global electronics market. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: M. Elizabeth Graham, Esq. GRANT &EISENHOFER P.A. 2325 Third Street, Suite 329 San Francisco, CA 94107 Telephone: (415) 229-9720 Facsimile: (415) 789-4367 Email: egraham@gelaw.com TOTAL RENAL CARE: Castaneda Suit Removed to C.D. California ----------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Michael Castaneda, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated v. TOTAL RENAL CARE, INC., a California corporation; DAVITA INC., a Delaware corporation; DVA RENAL HEALTHCARE, INC., a Tennessee corporation; DVA HEALTHCARE RENAL CARE, INC., a Nevada corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No. 25STCV30257 was removed from the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on Dec. 31, 2025, and assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-12378. The Plaintiff asserts claims against Defendants under the California Labor Code for unpaid overtime, improper meal periods, improper rest periods, unpaid minimum wages, failure to timely pay wages due at termination, failure to timely pay wages during employment, failure to provide proper wage statements, failure to maintain requisite payroll records, and failure to reimburse necessary business-related expenses.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Gregory W. Knopp, Esq. Jonathan P. Slowik, Esq. Jennifer J. McDermott, Esq. PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: 310-557-2900 Facsimile: 310-557-2193 Email: gknopp@proskauer.com jslowik@proskauer.com jmcdermott@proskauer.com TOWNE MORTGAGE: Seven Class Actions Consolidated ------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as SHERI SHELTON, THOMAS STUCKY, BENJAMIN POWERS, TOBY D SESSOMS, TERECOS CROMER, GREGG RICHARDSON, and BRIAN TODD BARNETTE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. TOWNE MORTGAGE COMPANY, Case No. 2:25-cv-13841-BRM-CI (E.D. Mich.), the Hon. Judge McMillion entered an order consolidating cases and appointing interim co-lead counsel. 1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), the Court consolidates the following cases: Sheri Shelton v. Towne Mortgage Company, No. 2:25-cv-13677; Thomas Stucky v. Towne Mortgage Company, No. 2:25-cv-13680; Benjamin Powers v. Towne Mortgage Company, No. 2:25-cv-13681; Toby D Sessoms v. Towne Mortgage Company, No. 2:25-cv-13722; Terecos Cromer v. Towne Mortgage Company, No. 2:25-cv-13724; Gregg Richardson v. Towne Mortgage Company, No. 2:25-cv-13725; and Brian Todd Barnette v. Towne Mortgage Company, No. 2:25-cv-13841. 2. The consolidated matter shall be referred to as "In re Towne Mortgage Company Data Security Incident Litigation" with the case number of the first-filed case, No. 25-cv-13677 (the "Consolidated Action"). The other cases will be administratively closed. 3. Any further filings shall be made in the Consolidated Action. All pleadings therein maintain their legal relevance until the filing of the Consolidated Complaint. The Order shall apply to any subsequently filed putative class action alleging the same or substantially similar allegations. All papers previously filed and served to date in the Related Actions are deemed part of the record in the Consolidated Action. The Defendants shall file a Notice of Related Case whenever a case that should be consolidated into this action is filed in, or transferred to, this District. Towne operates as a mortgage banking firm. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 29, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=UaF4IZ at no extra charge.[CC] TRANS UNION LLC: Johnson Suit Transferred to N.D. Illinois ---------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Patti Johnson, John Corbett, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Trans Union, LLC, Case No. 2:25-cv-01554 was transferred from the Western District of Pennsylvania, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on Dec. 31, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:25-cv-15750 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract. TransUnion LLC -- https://www.transunion.com/ -- is an American consumer credit reporting agency.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Sara J. Watkins, Esq. ROBERT PEIRCE & ASSOCIATES, PC 437 Grant Street, Suite 1100 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Phone: (412) 281-7229 Email: swatkins@peircelaw.com The Defendant is represented by: Michael W. McTigue, Jr., Esq. SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP One Manhattan West New York, NY 10001 Phone: (212) 735-3529 Email: michael.mctigue@skadden.com TREE SERVICE NASSAU: Quintero Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Tree Service Nassau NY Corp., et al. The case is styled as Alberto Quintero, on behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly-situated v. Tree Service Nassau NY Corp. and Jose O. Cardoza, individually, Case No. 628064/2025 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty., Dec. 30, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Other - Torts (Employment). Tree Service Nassau NY Corp. -- https://treeservicenassaunycorp.com/ -- is a company in Glen Head, New York that offers professional and quality tree removal, landscaping, and more.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael John Borrelli, Esq. BORRELLI & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. 1133 Westchester Ave, White Plains, NY 10604 Phone: (914) 825-8620 TRIZETTO PROVIDER: Barbera Sues Over Failure to Secure PHI/PII -------------------------------------------------------------- Joseph Barbera, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. TRIZETTO PROVIDER SOLUTIONS, LLC; COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION; and BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF RHODE ISLAND, Case No. 4:25-cv-01886 (D. Mo., Dec. 30, 2025), is brought against Defendant for its failure to properly secure and safeguard the protected health information and other personally identifiable information of certain individuals including name, address, date of birth, Social Security number, and health insurance information (“PHI/PII”). On October 2, 2025, Defendant TriZetto discovered that an unauthorized party gained access to its system that contained private information (hereafter referred to as the “Data Breach”). The unauthorized access to Defendant TriZetto’s system began in November 2024 and continued almost a year before the unauthorized access was detected. The Defendants have not disclosed the details of the root cause of the Data Breach, the vulnerabilities exploited, or the remedial measures undertaken to ensure such a breach does not occur again. To date, these omitted details have not been explained or clarified to Plaintiff, who retains a vested interest in ensuring that their Private Information remains protected. The Data Breach was a direct result of Defendants’ failure to implement reasonable safeguards to protect PHI/PII from a foreseeable and preventable risk of unauthorized disclosure. Had Defendants implemented administrative, technical, and physical controls consistent with industry standards and best practices, they could have prevented the Data Breach. The Defendants’ negligence resulted in the unauthorized disclosure of Plaintiff’s Private Information to cybercriminals. The unauthorized disclosure of Plaintiff’s PHI/PII constitutes an invasion of a legally protected privacy interest, that is traceable to the Defendants’ failure to adequately secure the PHI/PII in their custody, and has resulted in actual, particularized, and concrete harm to the Plaintiff, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a customer of BCBS and was a victim of the Data Breach. TriZetto is a revenue management service that provides care management services to physicians, hospitals, and health systems.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: James J. Rosemergy, Esq. CAREY, DANIS & LOWE 8235 Forsyth Blvd, Suite 1100 St. Louis, MO 63105 Phone: 314-678-1064 Fax: 314-721-0905 Email: jrosemergy@careydanis.com - and - Paul J. Doolittle, Esq. POULIN | WILLEY | ANASTOPOULO, LLC 32 Ann Street, Charleston, SC 29403 Phone: (803) 222-2222 Email: pauldoolittle@poulinwilley.com cmad@poulinwilley.com ULTA SALON: Repperger Suit Transferred to E.D. Washington --------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Veronica Repperger, Amber Lamar, Charra Caldwell, Rebekah Clark, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-02398 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington on Dec. 31, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-00526-RLP to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Ulta Beauty -- https://www.ulta.com/ -- is the largest U.S. beauty retailer and the premier beauty destination for cosmetics, fragrance, skin care products, hair care products and salon services.[BN] The Defendant is represented by: Amanda S Amert, Esq. Brian C. Frontino, Esq. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 600 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1600 Miami, FL 33131 Phone: (305) 415-3314 Fax: (305) 415-3001 Email: brian.frontino@morganlewis.com UNILEVER UNITED: Gardner Sues Over Mislabeled Deodorant Product --------------------------------------------------------------- DORIS GARDNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-07113 (E.D.N.Y., Dec. 29, 2025) is an action alleging that the Defendant mislabeled its Dove Men+Care 0% Aluminum Deodorant (the "Products"). According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, the Defendant prominently advertises, markets, and sells the Products as a deodorant that contains "no alcohol" (the "Alcohol Representation"). The Alcohol Representation promises that the Products do not contain alcohol ingredients. The Defendant intentionally misleads consumers into believing that the Products do not contain alcohol ingredients. It does this because consumers believe that alcohol ingredients can be harmful and cause skin irritation and allergic reactions. As a result, consumers are seeking out products without alcohol ingredients to nourish and protect their skin. However, unbeknownst to consumers, the Products do contain an alcohol ingredient in the form of benzyl alcohol, says the suit. Unilever United States, Inc. manufactures personal care products. The Company offers laundry detergents, shampoos, soaps, fragrances, and body washes. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Stacey Ann Van Malden, Esq. GOLDBERGER & DUBIN, PC 401 Broadway, Ste 306 New York, NY 10013 Telephone: (212) 431-9380 Facsimile: (212) 966-0588 Email: staceyl11@optonline.net - and - Brittany S. Scott, Esq. SMITH KRIVOSHEY, PC 28 Geary Str Ste. 650 No. 1507 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 839-7077 Facsimile: (888) 410-0415 E-mail: brittany@skclassactions.com UNITED STATES: Rodriguez Balks at Withdrawal of Assistance Claims ----------------------------------------------------------------- VELMA PACHECO-RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY AND DOES 1-20, Defendants, Case No. 1:26-cv-00009 (D.N.M., January 3, 2026) seeks to challenge Federal Emergency Management Agency's practice of administratively closing or withdrawing claims submitted under the Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon Fire Assistance Act without issuing determinations, without providing lawful notice or required procedures, and without engaging in reasoned decision-making as required by law. According to the complaint, FEMA has declared Plaintiffs' claims to be closed and/or withdrawn without a reasoned explanation, lawful justification, or procedural protections required by the Administrative Procedure Act and the HPFAA. Moreover, FEMA has refused to process Plaintiffs' Proofs of Loss (POLs) based on unwarranted, inconsistent, and ambiguous determinations that Plaintiffs failed to satisfy regulatory requirements, even where FEMA's own records reflect claim development, draft POLs, or acceptance of supporting documentation, says the suit. Federal Emergency Management Agency is an executive agency of the United States government that coordinates federal disaster response, preparation, and recovery for natural and man-made disasters. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Antonia Roybal-Mack, Esq. Amelia P. Nelson, Esq. ROYBAL MACK & CORDOVA, P.C. PO Box 91658 Albuquerque, NM 87119 Telephone: (505) 288-3500 E-mail: antonia@roybalmacklaw.com amelia@roybalmacklaw.com - and - Ian Cloud, Esq. ROBINS CLOUD, LLP 2000 West Loop South, STE 2200 Houston, TX 77027 Telephone: (713) 650-1200 E-mail: icloud@robinscloud.com VENEZUELA: Zahn Seeks to Modify Class Cert Briefing Schedule ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Zahn v. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Case No. 1:24-cv-09271-JPC-HJR (S.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order modifying the current class certification briefing schedule. Due to certain unanticipated issues that have arisen with the Plaintiff's availability during the holidays, we request a brief extension of Plaintiff's deadline for the class certification motion and the briefing schedule. If granted, the amended briefing schedule would be as follows: (1) the Plaintiff's motion for class certification is due Jan.12, 2026; (2) the Defendant's opposition brief is due March 12, 2026; and (3) the Plaintiff's reply brief is due April 13, 2026. The Defendant consents to the above extension and amended briefing schedule. This is the first request from either party to modify the class certification briefing schedule. The Defendant is a country on the northern coast of South America with diverse natural attractions. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Dec. 31, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=KiAMry at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Anthony J. Costantini, Esq. Rudolph J. DiMassa, Esq. Arti Fotedar, Esq. Stephanie Lamerce, Esq. DUANE MORRIS LLP 22 Vanderbilt 335 Madison Avenue, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10017-4669 Telephone: (212) 692-1032 Facsimile: (212) 692-1020 E-mail: ajcostantini@duanemorris.com dimassa@duanemorris.com afotedar@duanemorris.com slamerce@duanemorris.com VETERANS GUARDIAN: Ford Wins Bid for Class Certification -------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JENNIFER FORD, ERIC BEARD, and BRIAN OTTERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. VETERANS GUARDIAN VA CLAIM CONSULTING, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-00756-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C.), the Hon. Judge Eagles entered an order that: 1. The plaintiffs' motion for class certification is granted. 2. The following classes are certified: a. UDTPA Initial Claim Class: "All veterans who made their first payment to Veterans Guardian in connection with an initial claim for VA Disability Compensation under a consulting contract substantially similar to Exhibit A to the Consolidated Complaint between Aug. 23, 2019, and the date of this Court's order approving class notice." b. UDTPA Non-Initial Claim Class: "All veterans who made their first payment to Veterans Guardian in connection with a non-initial claim for VA Disability Compensation under a consulting contract substantially similar to Exhibit A to the Consolidated Complaint between Aug.23, 2019, and the date of this Court's order approving class notice." c. NCDCA Class: "All veterans who, between Aug.23, 2019, and the date of this Court's order approving class notice, were sent an invoice by Veterans Guardian in connection with a claim for VA Disability Compensation in substantially the same form as Exhibit B to the Consolidated Complaint and who made a payment to Veterans Guardian." 3. Eric Beard is appointed class representative of the initial UDTPA claim class. 4. Jennifer Ford and Brian Otters are appointed class representatives of the non-initial UDTPA claim class. 5. Jennifer Ford, Eric Beard, and Brian Otters are appointed class representatives of the NCDCA class. 6. The Plaintiffs' interim lead class counsel, Christopher J. Brochu, Brian W. Warwick, Janet R. Varnell, Pamela G. Levinson, and Varnell & Warwick P.A. and Jeff Osterwise, Shanon J. Carson, Radha Nagamani Raghavan, and Berger Montague PC are appointed as class counsel for all three classes. Veterans Guardian is a consulting firm. A copy of the Court's memorandum and order dated Dec. 30, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=XoXOyi at no extra charge.[CC] VOLUSIA COUNTY, FL: Powell Amended Complaint Tossed w/o Prejudice ----------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as KIMBERLY POWELL, et al., v. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, Case No. 6:21-cv-01791-JSS-NWH (M.D. Fla.), the Hon. Judge Sneed entered an order as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's recommendation is adopted. 2. The Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted. 3. The Plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint on or before Jan. 30, 2026. 4. The Plaintiff's motion for class certification is denied without prejudice. The Plaintiffs may file a renewed motion for class certification on or before May 1, 2026 The Plaintiffs initiated this putative class action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the Defendant failed to accommodate their minor children's disabilities and engaged in a pattern of discrimination and deliberate indifference on account of those disabilities. The Plaintiffs filed the operative second amended complaint on April 24, 2025. The Defendant moves to dismiss the amended complaint. The Plaintiff opposes the motion. On Dec.9, 2025, the magistrate judge issued a recommendation that the court grant the motion and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. No party has filed objections to the recommendation, and the time to do so has passed. Upon consideration, the court adopts the recommendation. The School Board of Volusia County, Florida, governs the Volusia County Schools (VCS), a large public school district in Central Florida. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 31, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=2iX1C6 at no extra charge.[CC] WEAR THE PEACE: Calcano Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ------------------------------------------------------------ Marcos Calcano, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated v. WEAR THE PEACE CLOTHING, INC., Case No. 1:25-cv-10758 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 30, 2025), is brought against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered thereby, is a violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Because Defendant's interactive website, https://wearthepeace.com, including all portions thereof or accessed thereon (collectively, the "Website" or "Defendant's Website"), is not equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. By failing to make its Website available in a manner compatible with computer screen reader programs, Defendant deprives blind and visually-impaired individuals the benefits of its online goods, content, and services--all benefits it affords nondisabled individuals--thereby increasing the sense of isolation and stigma among those persons that Title III was meant to redress, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using his computer. WEAR THE PEACE CLOTHING, INC., operates the Wear The Peace online retail store, as well as the Wear The Peace interactive Website and advertises, markets, and operates in the State of New York and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, N.Y. 10003-2461 Phone: (212) 228-9795 Fax: (212) 982-6284 Email: Michael@Gottlieb.legal Danalgottlieb@aol.com Jeffrey@gottlieb.legal WESTERN REFINING RETAIL: Heater Suit Removed to C.D. California --------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Shawn Heater, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. WESTERN REFINING RETAIL, LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. 25STCV33918 was removed from the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on Dec. 31, 2025, and assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-12435. The Plaintiff’s Complaint generally purports to bring his claims on behalf of himself and a class of California employees based on alleged violations of the California Labor Code. The Complaint asserts, on a class-wide basis, the following causes of action: Failure to Pay Minimum Wages; Failure to Pay Overtime Wages; Failure to Provide Meal Periods; Failure to Authorize and Permit Rest Periods; Failure to Indemnify Necessary Business Expenses; Failure to Pay Final Wages of Discharged Employees; Failure to Provide Accurate and Compliant Wage records; and Unfair Business Practices.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Julie R. Trotter, Esq. Mireya A.R. Llaurado, Esq. Madeleine K. Lee, Esq. Pamela McElroy, Esq. CALL & JENSEN A Professional Corporation 610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 700 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: (949) 717-3000 Email: jtrotter@calljensen.com mllaurado@calljensen.com mlee@calljensen.com pmcelroy@calljensen.com - and - Eric A. Welter, Esq. WELTER LAW FIRM, P.C. 20130 Lakeview Center Plaza, Suite 400 Ashburn, VA 20147 Phone: (703) 435-8500 Fax: (703) 435-8851 Email: eaw@welterlaw.com WICKED TACO: Gonzalez Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Bid ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Gonzalez v. Wicked Taco LLC et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-09555-NCM-JAM (E.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order granting an extension of time to file the motions for summary judgment and class certification as follows: -- The Plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment and class certification by Jan. 23, 2026; -- The Defendants' opposition and motion for summary judgment by Feb.13, 2026; -- The Plaintiffs' opposition and reply by March 6, 2026; and -- The Defendants' reply by March 20, 2026 . The Defendant offers Mexican food. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Dec. 31, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=CSrasu at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: C.K. Lee, Esq. LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC 148 West 24th Street, Eighth Floor New York, NY 10011 Telephone: (212) 465-1180 Facsimile: (212) 465-1181 E-mail: info@leelitigation.com WISE US INC: Calcano Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website --------------------------------------------------------- Marcos Calcano, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated v. WISE US INC., Case No. 1:25-cv-10809 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 31, 2025), is brought against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its website, and therefore denial of its products and services offered thereby, is a violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Because Defendant's interactive website, https://wise.com, including all portions thereof or accessed thereon (collectively, the "Website" or "Defendant's Website"), is not equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. By failing to make its Website available in a manner compatible with computer screen reader programs, Defendant deprives blind and visually-impaired individuals the benefits of its online goods, content, and services--all benefits it affords nondisabled individuals--thereby increasing the sense of isolation and stigma among those persons that Title III was meant to redress, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using his computer. WISE US INC., operates the Wise online retail store, as well as the Wise interactive Website and advertises, markets, and operates in the State of New York and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, N.Y. 10003-2461 Phone: (212) 228-9795 Fax: (212) 982-6284 Email: Michael@Gottlieb.legal Jeffrey@gottlieb.legal Danalgottlieb@aol.com WOVEN NOOK: Davis Seeks Equal Website Access for Blind Users ------------------------------------------------------------ NICOLE DAVIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WOVEN NOOK LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-15753 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 30, 2025) alleges violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant's Web site, https://wovennook.com/, is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, including the Plaintiff, in violation of the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Web site will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. Woven Nook LLC is a private, Utah-based e-commerce company specializing in home decor, particularly throw pillow covers and rugs. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: David B. Reyes, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (844) 731-3343 Facsimile: (718) 554-0237 Email: Dreyes@ealg.law X CORP: Filing for Class Cert Bid in White Coat Suit Due Feb. 16 ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as WHITE COAT CAPTIONING, LLC, et al., v. X CORP., INC., Case No. 3:23-cv-01594-SK (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Kim entered an order granting the Plaintiffs' administrative motion for extension of discovery and motion for class certification deadlines. The Court set the following amended case deadlines: Event Deadline Close of Fact discovery: Jan.23, 2026 Deadline to file motion for class Feb. 16, 2026 certification: Deadline to file opposition to motion March 18, 2026 for class certification: Close of expert discovery: March 27, 2026 Deadline to file reply in support of April 1, 2026 motion for class certification: Hearing on motion for class April 20, 2026 at certification and further CMC: 9:30 a.m. via Public Zoom Webinar Deadline to file summary judgment motion: June 29, 2026 X Corp. is an American technology company. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 30, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=9oG6mH at no extra charge.[CC] XERIS PHARMACEUTICALS: Faces Suit Over Unprotected Personal Info ---------------------------------------------------------------- M.D.F., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. XERIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:26-cv-00010 (N.D. Ill., January 2, 2026) arises from the Defendant's failure to keep its patients' private personal and health information confidential. According to the complaint, the Defendant collected and transmitted personally identifiable and sensitive health information pertaining to Plaintiff's medical conditions, prescriptions and medical expenses to unauthorized third parties, including Alphabet, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and ByteDance, Inc., through the use of surreptitious online tracking tools without Plaintiff's or Class Members' consent. As a result of the Defendant's conduct, the Plaintiff and Class Members have suffered numerous injuries, including: (i) invasion of medical privacy; (ii) lack of trust in communicating with medical providers; (iii) emotional distress and heightened concerns related to the release of sensitive health information to third parties, (iv) loss of benefit of the bargain; (v) diminution of value of the sensitive health information; (vi) statutory damages and (vii) continued and ongoing risk to their sensitive health information. Accordingly, the Plaintiff seeks, on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated persons, to remedy these harms and assert the following statutory and common law claims against Defendant: invasion of privacy; breach of confidence; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; breach of implied contract; unjust enrichment; and violations of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. Headquartered in Chicago, IL, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc operates as a specialty pharmaceutical company. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jordan Underhill, Esq. Tyler J. Bean, Esq. Sonjay C. Singh, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 New York, NY 10151 Telephone: (212) 532-1091 E-mail: tbean@sirillp.com ssingh@sirillp.com ********* S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA. Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L. Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors. Copyright 2026. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272. This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the publishers. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed. The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000. *** End of Transmission ***