260107.mbx

260107.mbx C L A S S A C T I O N R E P O R T E R Wednesday, January 7, 2026, Vol. 28, No. 5 Headlines 15UTAH LLC: Patil Balks at Unsolicited Telemarketing Calls 700 CREDIT: Faces Eck Suit Over Failure to Protect Clients' Info ALLSTATE INSURANCE: Class Certification Filing Continued to May 6 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL: Arcadia City Sues Over Firetruck Sale Monopoly AMERICAN PIZZA: Property Inaccessible to the Disabled, Haynes Says AMERICAN PLUMBING: Freeman Sues Over Retained Retirement Money ANNE ARUNDEL: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Hillis Due March 1 APPLE INC: Plaintiff Seeks Leave to File Supplemental Authority ARIZONA BEVERAGES: Expert Discovery in Furman Due Jan. 18, 2027 ARSTRAT LLC: Deadline to File Class Cert Bid Revised to April 2 ASA UNIVERSAL: Ford Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind ATLANTIC PERSONNEL: Maclin Suit Alleges Violation of FCRA AUTOMATTIC INC: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Keller Due July 20, 2026 AVANTIC MEDICAL: O'Hara Seeks OK of Class Cert. & Default Judgment AYLO HOLDINGS: Doe Sues Over Unauthorized Access of Clients' Info BEST CHEER: Silica Claims Bar Date Set for March 1 BULWARK CONSTRUCTION: Garibay Labor Suit Removed to S.D. Calif. BYHEART INC: Lugo Sues Over Contaminated Infant Formula Products CAL-MAINE FOODS: Faces Suit Over Conventional Egg Price-Fixing CAL-MAINE FOODS: Sued Over Conspiracy to Fix Fresh Egg Prices CKC ENTERPRISES: Echols Files Suit Over Blind-Inaccessible Website CNHI LLC: Fails to Safeguard Clients' Personal Info, Dudek Says COMBE INC: Senior Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS: Russell Seeks Technicians' Unpaid OT CREATE WELLNESS: Macartney Sues Over Gummies' Deceptive Labeling CURRICULUM ASSOCIATES: Faces Suit Over Data Privacy Violations CUT 432: Blind Users Can't Access Website, Hernandez Suit Alleges DELOITTE & TOUCHE: $34MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Feb. 26 DKGA/WUC LP: Faces Garcia Suit Over Disabled's Access Barriers ENVOY AIR: Parks Balks at Failure to Protect Highly Sensitive Data F & J PINE: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Bruno Alleges FIRST PREMIER: Clarke Files Suit Over TCPA Violation FOURTHSTREETFOODS: Mason Sues Over Mass Layoff w/out Proper Notice GOODER FOODS: Moran Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind GOOGLE LLC: Rose Alleges Unlawful Google Drive Subscription Policy HPS ADVISORY: Giusti Sues Over Breach of Insurance Contract HUGHES TRIM: Maclin Suit Alleges Violation of FCRA INHOSPITAL PHYSICIANS: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Seward Says INSPIRE MEDICAL: Indiana Sues Over Drop in Share Price JR&F BUILDERS: Underpays Construction Workers, Perez Suit Says LONG ISLAND: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Natale Alleges MADISON MANAGEMENT: Quiroz Privacy Suit Removed to E.D. Wis. MARQUIS SOFTWARE: Fails to Secure Personal Info, Rhinehart Says MOMENTUM SOLAR: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Oguekwe Suit Claims MONSANTO COMPANY: Faces Cano Suit Over Harmful Herbicide Roundup MONSANTO COMPANY: Faces Hostetler Suit Over Defective Herbicide MONSANTO COMPANY: Foster Sues Over Harmful Herbicide Roundup MONSANTO COMPANY: Gooch Sues Over Harmful Herbicide Roundup MONSANTO COMPANY: Herbicide Roundup "Defective," Coones Alleges MONSANTO COMPANY: Herbicide Roundup "Defective," Johnson Says MONSANTO COMPANY: Herbicide Roundup "Defective," Montgomery Says MONSANTO COMPANY: Herbicide Roundup "Defective," Plant Claims MONSANTO COMPANY: Kuhns Sues Over Defective Herbicide Roundup MONSANTO COMPANY: Mari Sues Over Roundup's Impact to Human Health MONSANTO COMPANY: Markets Defective Herbicide, Lockhart Claims MONSANTO COMPANY: Morris Sues Over Sale of Defective Herbicide MONSANTO COMPANY: Oliphant Sues Over Herbicide's Health Risks MONSANTO COMPANY: Roundup Herbicide "Defective," Lewis Suit Says MONSANTO COMPANY: Roundup Product Causes Cancer, Palmiero Claims MONSANTO COMPANY: Scar Sues Over Defective Herbicide Roundup MONSANTO COMPANY: Sells Hazardous Herbicide, Newlin Suit Alleges MONSANTO COMPANY: Sjonvall Sues Over Defective Herbicide Roundup MOUTH WATCHERS: Faces Murphy Suit Over Blind-Inaccessible Website O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE: Fails to Stop Work Discrimination, Hall Says OKUMA FISHING: Website Inaccessible to Blind Users, Evans Says ORACLE CORP: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Long Alleges ORMS INC: Blind Users Can't Access Website, Youngren Suit Alleges OSHKOSH CORP: Commack Fire Sues Over Firetruck Sale Monopoly PERELEL INC: Moran Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind PRESTIGE CAR: Refuses to Honor Gift Cards, Garick Suit Says PRIMO BRANDS: Misrepresents Water Delivery Services, Hamilton Says PROSPER FUNDING: Prescott Balks at Failure to Protect Personal Info PSKW LLC: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Gamble Suit Alleges RED ROBIN: Faces Collins Suit Over TCPA Violation RICHLAND MANAGEMENT: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Nicolas Alleges RITZ LLC: Mattera Sues Over Disabled's Equal Access to Property RIVERFRONT STAMPING: Guzman Sues Over Discrimination & Harassment ROBERT BOSCH: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Johnson Alleges SAN FRANCISCO, CA: Litvinova Appeals Summary Judgment to 9th Cir. SMARTSHEET INC: KaraEftimoglu Balks at Misleading Proxy Statements SOUTHWEST AIRLINES: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Ibrahim Alleges SYNGENTA CROP: Summerford Sues Over Wrongful Sale of Herbicide SYNGENTA CROP: Sumner Sues Over Negligent Distribution and Sale SYNGENTA CROP: Taylor Sues Over Wrongful Advertising and Sale SYNGENTA CROP: White Sues Over Wrongful Advertising and Sale TASTE SALUD INC: Varela Files Suit in C.D. California TESLA INC: Appeals Class Cert. Order in Losavio Suit to 9th Circuit TRANSCOM WORLDWIDE: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Bailey Alleges TRANSUNION LLC: Tapia Suit Transferred to N.D. Illinois TRIAGE PARTNERS: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Lauray Alleges UNITED AIRLINES: Faces Hogan Suit Over Wrongful Termination VENEZUELA: Appeals Adopted Master's Recommendation to 3rd Circuit VENEZUELA: Appeals Final Recommendation Order in Gold Reserve Suit VENEZUELA: Appeals Special Master's Final Recommendation Order VIP SECURITY: Goilo Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime for Security Agents WALMART INC: Faces Rowe Suit Over Warehouse Associates' Unpaid OT WELLS FARGO: Liable to Stolen Investor Money, Joseph Suit Claims WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY: Harrington Sues Over Work Discrimination WHEELER REIT: $7.1MM Class Settlement to be Heard on March 31 WISDOM NATURAL: Boyd Sues Over Mislabeled Organic Sweetener XPDI SPONSOR: $14.75MM Class Settlement to be Heard on March 17 ********* 15UTAH LLC: Patil Balks at Unsolicited Telemarketing Calls ---------------------------------------------------------- SHAYLIN PATIL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. 15UTAH LLC, Defendant, Case No. 3:25-cv-10601-AMO (N.D. Cal., December 11, 2025) is a putative class action brought against the Defendant pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. To promote its services, the Defendant engages in aggressive unsolicited telemarketing, harming thousands of consumers in the process, asserts the complaint. The Defendant utilizes aggressive marketing to push its products and services without regards to consumers' rights under the TCPA, even after customers opt out from Defendant's messages, it adds. Through this action, the Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief to halt Defendant's illegal conduct, which has resulted in the invasion of privacy, harassment, aggravation, and disruption of the daily life of thousands of individuals. The Plaintiff also seeks statutory damages on behalf of herself and members of the class, and any other available legal or equitable remedies. 15Utah LLC is an entertainment company that provides social entertainment services to consumers, based out of California.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott Edelsberg, Esq. EDELSBERG LAW, P.A. 1925 Century Park E #1700 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (305) 975-3320 E-mail: scott@edelsberglaw.com 700 CREDIT: Faces Eck Suit Over Failure to Protect Clients' Info ---------------------------------------------------------------- BRIANNA ECK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. 700 CREDIT, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 4:25-cv-14077-FKB-EAS (E.D. Mich., December 17, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for negligence, breach of implied contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, and declaratory judgment. The case arises from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals stored within its network systems following a data breach between May 2025 and October 2025. The Defendant also failed to timely notify the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals about the data breach. As a result, the private information of the Plaintiff and Class members was compromised and damaged through access by and disclosure to unknown and unauthorized third parties, says the suit. 700 Credit, LLC is a company that provides credit reporting and related information services to businesses, with its principal place of business in Southfield, Michigan. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gerald D. Wells, III, Esq. LYNCH CARPENTER, LLP 1760 Market Street, Suite 600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (267) 609-6910 Facsimile: (267) 609-6955 Email: jerry@lcllp.com ALLSTATE INSURANCE: Class Certification Filing Continued to May 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as KEXIN TANG, an individual; RYAN JAMES ROBERTSON an individual; and on behalf of all others similarly situated; v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY; ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY; CENTURY-NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; DIRECT GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY; ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; FIRST COLONIAL INSURANCE COMPANY; INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; INTEGON PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY; MIC GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION; NATIONAL FARMERS UNION PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY; NATIONAL GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONAL GENERAL PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY; corporations, Case No. 2:25-cv-09734-JFW-E (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Walter entered an order continuing deadline for filing class certification motion. The Plaintiff deadline for filing their motion for class certification is continued from Feb. 6, 2026, to May 6, 2026. Allstate is an American insurance company. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 29, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=7MZAPY at no extra charge.[CC] AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL: Arcadia City Sues Over Firetruck Sale Monopoly ------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF ARCADIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS, LLC; AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS CAPITAL FUND IV, LP; AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS CAPITAL FUND IV (PARALLEL), LP; AIP/CHC HOLDINGS, LLC; OSHKOSH CORPORATION; REV GROUP, INC.; ROSENBAUER AMERICA LLC; and FIRE APPARATUS MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-02005-BBC (E.D. Wis., Dec. 22, 2025) alleges violation of the Sherman Act. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, the Defendants' strategic conduct to consolidate the market, charge supra-competitive prices, and backlog delivery of new fire apparatus has diminished the availability of fire trucks, impairing firefighters' ability to respond effectively and leaving the public less protected during fires and other emergencies. Beginning as early as January 2016, the Defendants entered into an agreement, combination or conspiracy to limit the supply, and to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize prices of fire trucks sold in the United States at supra-competitive levels. Defendants' anticompetitive conduct directly caused Plaintiff to pay artificially inflated prices for fire trucks, thereby sustaining antitrust injury in violation of federal and state antitrust laws, says the suit. American Industrial Partners, L.P. operates as an operationally oriented middle-market private equity firm. The Firm offers investments in industrial businesses serving domestic and global markets. AIP invests in forms of corporate diverstitures, management buyouts, and going-private transactions. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alex Phillips, Esq. Brittany Resch, Esq. Sam Strauss, Esq. Raina Borrelli, Esq. STRAUSS BORRELLI PLLC One Magnificent Mile 980 Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 Telephone: (872) 263-1100 Facsimile: (872) 263-1109 Email: aphillips@straussborrelli.com bresch@straussborrelli.com sam@straussborrelli.com raina@straussborrelli.com - and - Adam J. Zapala, Esq. Elizabeth T. Castillo, Esq. Christopher F. Jeu, Esq. Christian S. Ruano, Esq. Lauren A. Devens, Esq. COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY LLP 840 Malcolm Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 Email: azapala@cpmlegal.com ecastillo@cpmlegal.com cjeu@cpmlegal.com cruano@cpmlegal.com ldevens@cpmlegal.com AMERICAN PIZZA: Property Inaccessible to the Disabled, Haynes Says ------------------------------------------------------------------ MICHAEL HAYNES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. AMERICAN PIZZA PARTNERS, LP; and DOES 1 to 25, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-02120 (W.D. Tex., Dec. 22, 2025) alleges violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendants' parking areas at Pizza Hut restaurants in the states of Colorado, Louisiana, Montana, Oklahoma, Texas, and Wyoming, is not accessible to mobility-impaired individuals in violation of ADA. American Pizza Partners, L.P. owns and operates restaurants. The Company offers pizza, pasta, chicken wings, sides, and drinks. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Benjamin J. Sweet, Esq. NYE, STIRLING, HALE, MILLER & SWEET, LLP 101 Pennsylvania Boulevard, Suite 2 Pittsburgh, PA 15228 Telephone: (412) 857-5352 Email: ben@nshmlaw.com - and - Jordan T. Porter, Esq. NYE, STIRLING, HALE, MILLER & SWEET, LLP 33 West Mission Street, Suite 201 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Telephone: (805) 963-2345 Email: jordan@nshmlaw.com - and - John D. Bosco, Esq BOSCO BLESS PLLC State Bar No. 24045533 13101 Preston Road, Suite 10 Dallas, TX 75240 Telephone: (214) 997-4434 Email: john@boscobless.com AMERICAN PLUMBING: Freeman Sues Over Retained Retirement Money -------------------------------------------------------------- JEFFREY FREEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. AMERICAN PLUMBING SYSTEMS, INC., WALTER JACOB KUHLMAN, III, JAMES JAY HANACEK IV, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 2:25-at-01774 (E.D. Cal., December 17, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, California Labor Code, California Civil Code, and California's Business and Professions Code, and fraud. According to the complaint, the Defendants deducted employee wages purportedly for retirement plan contributions but fraudulently failed to remit those amounts to the employees' retirement accounts, resulting in losses recoverable as unpaid wages, restitution, penalties, interest, and equitable relief. The Plaintiff seeks, inter alia, appropriate ERISA remedies, statutory remedies under Labor Code Sec. 221, and restitution and injunctive relief under the Unfair Competition Law. American Plumbing Systems, Inc. is a commercial and industrial engineering company in California. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: David Glenn Spivak, Esq. Caroline Tahmassian, Esq. THE SPIVAK LAW FIRM 8605 Santa Monica Bl. PMB 42554 West Hollywood, CA 90069 Telephone: (213) 725-9094 Facsimile: (213) 634-2485 Email: david@spivaklaw.com caroline@spivaklaw.com ANNE ARUNDEL: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Hillis Due March 1 ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as STEPHANIE ALLORI HILLIS, v. ANNE ARUNDEL DERMATOLOGY, P.A., Case No. 6:25-cv-01936-CEM-LHP (M.D. Fla.), the Hon. Judge Mendoza entered a case management and scheduling order. Action or Event Deadline Mandatory initial disclosures: Feb. 9, 2026 Motion to join a party or amend pleadings: Mar. 20, 2026 The Plaintiff's expert report disclosure: Feb.2, 2027 The Defendant's expert report disclosure: Mar. 4, 2027 Completion of discovery and motion to Apr. 2, 2027 compel discovery: Class Certification: Mar. 1, 2026 Dispositive and Daubert motions: May 4, 2027 Anne is a multi-state dermatology provider. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 23, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=pIWAH2 at no extra charge.[CC] APPLE INC: Plaintiff Seeks Leave to File Supplemental Authority --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as JANE DOE et al., v. APPLE INC., Case No. 3:20-cv-00421-NJR (S.D. Ill.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order motion for leave to submit supplemental authority in support of motion for class certification. Accordingly, the court saw "no infirmity in the district court's conclusion based on these observations that affected users may be unable or unwilling to undertake this costly litigation alone without any guarantee of recovery." Apple is an American multinational technology company. A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated Dec. 23, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=s9Q5g6 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Jerome J. Schlichter, Esq. Troy A. Doles, Esq. Andrew D. Schlichter, Esq. Alexander L. Braitberg, Esq. Chen Kasher, Esq. Kaitlin Minkler, Esq. Sean M. Milford, Esq. SCHLICHTER BOGARD LLP 100 South Fourth Street, Suite 1200 St. Louis, MO 63102 Telephone: (314) 621-6115 Facsimile: (314) 621-5934 E-mail: jschlichter@uselaws.com tdoles@uselaws.com aschlichter@uselaws.com abraitberg@uselaws.com ckasher@uselaws.com kminkler@uselaws.com smilford@uselaws.com - and - Christian G. Montroy, Esq. MONTROY LAW OFFICES, LLC 2416 North Center Maryville, IL 62062 Telephone: (618) 223-8200 Facsimile: (618) 223-8355 E-mail: cmontroy@montroylaw.com ARIZONA BEVERAGES: Expert Discovery in Furman Due Jan. 18, 2027 --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Furman v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC, Case No. 2:25-cv-01575 (E.D. Cal., Filed June 5, 2025), the Hon. Judge Daniel J. Calabretta entered an order modifying scheduling order as follows: -- Expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before Dec. 8, 2026. -- All expert discovery shall be completed no later than Jan. 18, 2027. -- The Plaintiffs motion for class certification shall be noticed for hearing before Judge Calabretta no later than Sept. 24, 2026. The nature of suit states Contract Product Liability. Arizona Beverages specializes in producing and distributing a wide range of beverages, including iced teas, energy drinks, juices, and sparkling waters.[CC] ARSTRAT LLC: Deadline to File Class Cert Bid Revised to April 2 --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as EVELYN CAMPOS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. ARSTRAT, LLC, Case No. 5:25-cv-01681-KK-DTB (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Kenly Kiya Kato entered an order granting renewed first stipulation to amend revised scheduling deadlines: Event Deadline Fact discovery cut-Off Feb. 12, 2026 (including hearing of discovery motions): Deadline to file motion for class Apr. 2, 2026 certification: ARstrat is an industry leading collection and bad debt resolution provider for the healthcare industry. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 23, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=hPWUgw at no extra charge.[CC] ASA UNIVERSAL: Ford Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind ------------------------------------------------------------ SANDRA FORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ASA UNIVERSAL INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-15375 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 18, 2025) alleges violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant's Web site, https://sonage.com, is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, including the Plaintiff, in violation of the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Web site will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. Asa Universal Inc. is a privately-held skincare company, known for its brand Sonage Skincare, offering clean, vegan, professional spa products for various skin concerns like aging, dryness, and acne, emphasizing natural ingredients and a holistic approach. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (844) 731-3343 Email: Achan@ealg.law ATLANTIC PERSONNEL: Maclin Suit Alleges Violation of FCRA --------------------------------------------------------- DAVID MACLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ATLANTIC PERSONNEL & TENANT SCREENING, INC., Defendant, Case No. 3:25-cv-01557 (M.D. Fla., Dec. 18, 2025) alleges violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The case is assigned to Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger. Atlantic Personnel & Tenant Screening, Inc. is a private company specializing in employee and tenant background screening services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jessica Wallace, Esq. Jayson Watkins, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 20200 W. Dixie Highway, Ste. 902 Aventura, FL 33180 Telephone: (509) 822-2463 Facsimile: (646) 417-5967 Email: jwallace@sirillp.com jwatkins@sirillp.com AUTOMATTIC INC: Class Cert. Bid Filing in Keller Due July 20, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as RYAN KELLER and SHARON SCHANZER, individually and on behalf of their businesses, KELLER HOLDINGS LLC (DBA SecureSight) and RLDGROUP, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. AUTOMATTIC INC., a Delaware corporation, and MATTHEW CHARLES MULLENWEG, an individual, Case No. 3:25-cv-01892-AMO (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin entered an order granting joint stipulation extending class certification and daubert motion deadlines. Deadline Date Deadline for Affirmative Expert Reports for May 18, 2026 Class Certification: Close of Fact Discovery for Class May 25, 2026 Certification (limited merits discovery permitted following class certification order, if necessary): Close of Expert Discovery for Class July 20, 2026 certification: Deadline for Motion for Class Certification: July 20, 2026 Deadline for Opposition to Motion for Class Aug. 17, 2026 Certification: Automattic develops open-source blogging software. A copy of the Court's order dated Dec. 23, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=OfXmxM at no extra charge.[CC] AVANTIC MEDICAL: O'Hara Seeks OK of Class Cert. & Default Judgment ------------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as DAWN O'HARA PAGAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. AVANTIC MEDICAL LAB, INC., Case No. 2:25-cv-14907-BRM-JSA (D.N.J.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order granting motion for class certification and default judgment against Avantic under Rules 23 and 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and pursuant to the Court's instruction on Dec. 4, 2025. Avantic is a full-service clinical laboratory. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Dec. 29, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=RdFX9Y at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mark K. Svensson, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 405 East 50th Street New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (202) 975-0468 E-mail: msvensson@milberg.com - and - Gary M. Klinger, Esq. MILBERG, PLLC 227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2100 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (866) 252-0878 E-mail: gklinger@milberg.com - and - Courtney Maccarone, Esq. Ken Grunfeld , Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW FERGUSON WEISELBERG GILBERT One West Las Olas Blvd, Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-4100 E-mail: maccarone@kolawyers.com grunfeld@kolawyers.com AYLO HOLDINGS: Doe Sues Over Unauthorized Access of Clients' Info ----------------------------------------------------------------- JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. AYLO HOLDINGS USA CORP., AYLO USA, INC., and AYLO BILLING LIMITED, collectively, d/b/a PornHub, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-02069 (W.D. Tex., December 17, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for negligence, negligence per se, unjust enrichment, breach of implied contract, and declaratory judgment. The case arises from the Defendants' failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals stored within their network systems following a data breach. The Defendants also failed to timely notify the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals about the data breach. As a result, the private information of the Plaintiff and Class members was compromised and damaged through access by and disclosure to unknown and unauthorized third parties, says the suit. Aylo Holdings USA Corp. is a company that owns and operates Pornhub.com, with its principal place of business in Austin, Texas. Aylo USA, Inc. is a company that owns and operates Pornhub.com, with its principal place of business in Austin, Texas. Aylo Billing Limited, collectively, d/b/a PornHub, is a company that owns and operates Pornhub.com, with its principal place of business in Austin, Texas. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Andrew J. Shamis, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, PA 14 NE First Avenue, Suite 705 Miami, FL 33132 Telephone: (305) 479-2299 Email: ashamis@shamisgentile.com - and - John Nelson, Esq. MILBERG PLLC 402 W. Broadway, Suite 1760 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (858) 209-6941 Email: jnelson@milberg.com - and - Jeff Ostrow, Esq. KOPELOWITZ OSTROW PA 1 West Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-4100 Email: ostrow@kolawyers.com BEST CHEER: Silica Claims Bar Date Set for March 1 -------------------------------------------------- UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SANTA ANA DIVISION In re: BEST CHEER STONE, INC, Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession. NOTICE OF SILICA CLAIMS BAR DATE Case No.: 8:25-bk-11344-SC Chapter 11 Judge Scott C. Clarkson YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS NOTICE BECAUSE YOU MAY HAVE A CLAIM AGAINST THE DEBTOR IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE. YOU SHOULD READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND DISCUSS IT WITH YOUR ATTORNEY. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN ATTORNEY, YOU MAY WISH TO CONSULT ONE. ATTENTION: TO THE DEALERS, FORMER AND CURRENT EMPLOYEES, PLAINTIFFS, OTHER PARTIES IN INTEREST WITH REAL OR POTENTIAL EXPOSURE TO PRODUCTS OF BEST CHEER STONE, INC.: Best Cheer Stone, Inc. (the "Company") commenced a case under Subchapter V of chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the "Chapter 11 Case") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California (the "Bankruptcy Court") and intends to reorganize through a chapter 11 plan and use its projected disposable income to pay claimants. If you have a "claim" within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(5) (a "Claim") against the Company, in order to keep your right to compensation if you have silicosis related illness, or any related injury, or a Claim for defense or indemnification, for yourself or a family member or loved one, or any other right to payment from the Company arising from any action or product sold by the Company prior to May 19, 2025 (the "Petition Date"), you must submit a proof of Claim by March 1, 2026, 5:00 p.m. Prevailing Pacific Time. As used in this Notice, the term Claim has the meaning given to it in section 101(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, and includes as to or against the Debtor: (a) any right to payment, whether or not such right is reduced to judgment, liquidated unliquidated, fixed, contingent matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured or unsecured; or (b) any right to an equitable remedy for breach of performance if such breach gives rise to a right to payment, whether or not such right to an equitable remedy is reduced to judgment, fixed, contingent, mature, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, secured or unsecured. The Bar Date Order and the procedures set forth therein and herein for the filing of Proofs of Claim apply to all Claims (the holder of any such Claim, is a "Claimant") that arose, or are deemed to have arisen, prior to the Petition Date, regardless of their character or nature, whether secured or unsecured, priority or non-priority, liquidated or unliquidated, or fixed or contingent, including, without limitation, Claims entitled to administrative priority status under section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code, no matter how-remote or contingent. Prior to the Petition Date, the Company sold, and distributed construction materials consisting of both natural and artificial stone, including quartz and quartzite for use in both residential and commercial buildings. The Company has been sued by parties that allegedly were exposed to silicosis allegedly found in the Company's products (the "Lawsuits"). The Company is one of numerous unrelated defendants named in the Lawsuits. The Company denies that it ever took any actions or sold any products that caused any person injuries or exposure or that it has any Indemnification liability related thereto for silicosis injuries. To date, no plaintiff has obtained a judgment against the Company. The Company has filed its Chapter 11 Case to obtain a "clean start" by restructuring its debts and distributing its -- projected disposable income fairly and equitably to claimants through a chapter 11 plan which will be paid overtime under the plan and will be paid to holders of allowed Claims against the Company. Given the allegations in the Lawsuits (which the Company denies) that people have been exposed to silicosis from the Company's products, the Bankruptcy Court has decided that in order to keep your right to compensation if you have a Claim as of the Petition Date, you must submit a proof of Claim by March 1, 2026, 5:00 p.m. Prevailing Pacific Time (the "Claims Bar Date"). What Is Silicosis? Silicosis is a type of pulmonary fibrosis, a lung disease caused by breathing in tiny bits of silica, a common mineral found in sand, quartz, and many other types of rock. Silicosis mainly affects workers exposed to silica dust In jobs such as construction and mining. Over time, exposure to silica particles causes scarring in the lungs, which can harm your ability to breathe. How Could This Affect Me? Given the Lawsuits and even though the Company denies that it ever sold any product that resulted in silica exposure that caused any person to contract silicosis, you may believe that you may have been exposed to silica from the distribution, use, or manufacture of the Company's products including quartz, quartzite, and other natural or man-made stone construction products. Silica exposure is also possible from coming into contact with another person who was exposed to the silica (for example, if the product was brought home on a family member's clothing). You may also file a proof of Claim on behalf of a deceased family member. What Do I Do Now? If you have a Claim, in order to keep any right to compensation, you must submit a Proof of Claim (or a family member may file a Claim), including any Claim due to being exposed to silica from the manufacture or use of the Company's products, you must submit a proof of Claim by the Silica Claims Bar Date, March 1, 2026, 5:00 p.m. Prevailing Pacific Time, Go to https//www.cacb.uscourts.gov/epoc-electronic-proof-claim , Case No. 8:25-bk-11344, to submit your proof of Claim online. You can submit a proof of Claim yourself or you can ask a lawyer to help you. Completing a proof of Claim form takes about five minutes. Will I Get Money If I Submit a Proof of Claim? Receiving or reading this notice does not mean that you have a Claim, were exposed to silica, will develop silicosis, or that you are eligible to receive money now or in the future. Further, there is no guaranty that the Company's Chapter 11 Case will result in recoveries for holders of Claims or that there will be sufficient funds reserved for such claimants if and when such Claims become allowed Claims. Further, since the Company filed the Chapter 11 Case and, depending on the Company's post-bankruptcy financial projections, it is possible that creditors, including creditors holding asserted silicosis or silica-related Claims, will receive little if any recovery from the Company. What If I Do Nothing? If you have a Claim and do not submit a proof of Claim by the Claims Bar Date, and the chapter 11 plan as proposed is approved, you will not be able to vote on any chapter 11 plan proposed by the Company, and you may not be eligible for Compensation from the Company even if you later assert that you have a Claim against the Company. How Do I Get More Information? If you would like copies of the Company's Schedules of Assets and Liabilities (the "Schedules"), the Bankruptcy Court order setting the Claims Bar Date, or other information, please contact rgoe@goeforlaw.com. If you have questions, call the Company's attorney, Robert P. Goe, Esq., or email rgoe@goeforlaw.com (Company's counsel cannot give legal advice). Reservation of the Company's Rights Nothing contained in this Notice is intended or should be taken as the Company giving up rights to (a) defend against any Claim, filed proof of Claim, or any Claim listed or reflected in the Schedules related to the nature, amount, liability or classification thereof; (b) subsequently designate any scheduled Claim as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated; and (c) otherwise amend or supplement the schedules. Attorney for Debtor: Robert Goe, Goe Forsythe & Hodges LLP; 17701 Cowan, Suite 210, Lobby D, Irvine, CA 92614. BULWARK CONSTRUCTION: Garibay Labor Suit Removed to S.D. Calif. --------------------------------------------------------------- The case ALFONSO MENDOZA GARIBAY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. BULWARK CONSTRUCTION INC. dba RESIDENTIAL WALL SYSTEMS; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Case No. 25CU057974C, was removed from the Superior Court of the State California for the County of San Diego to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on December 17, 2025. The Clerk of Court for the Southern District of California assigned Case No. 3:25-cv-03643-AJB-BJW to the proceeding. The suit is brought against the Defendant for alleged violation of California Labor Code. Bulwark Construction Inc., doing business as Residential Wall Systems, is a specialty contractor in California. [BN] The Defendant is represented by: Erick J. Becker, Esq. Garrett M. Fahy, Esq. Joshua Park, Esq. CUMMINS & WHITE, LLP 2424 S.E. Bristol Street, Suite 300 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (949) 852-1800 Facsimile: (949) 852-8510 Email: ebecker@cwlawyers.com gfahy@cwlawyers.com jpark@cwlawyers.com BYHEART INC: Lugo Sues Over Contaminated Infant Formula Products ---------------------------------------------------------------- JILLIAN LUGO and ALLISON NOONAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. BYHEART, INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-10243 (S.D.N.Y., December 10, 2025) seeks to remedy the alleged deceptive and misleading business practices of ByHeart regarding the manufacturing, marketing, and sale of Defendant's infant formula products, including the ByHeart Whole Nutrition Infant Formula cans and Anywhere Pack, throughout the United States, which contained Clostridium botulinum. According to the complaint, the Defendant has improperly, deceptively, and misleadingly labeled and marketed its products to reasonable consumers, like Plaintiff, by omitting and not disclosing to consumers on its packaging that the products are contaminated or are at risk of being contaminated with Clostridium botulinum, a bacteria which causes life threatening illnesses such as infant botulism. The Plaintiffs and Class Members paid a price premium for the Products based upon Defendant's marketing and advertising campaign including its false and misleading representations and omission on the products' labels. Given that Plaintiff and Class Members paid a premium for the products, the Plaintiffs and Class Members suffered an injury in the amount of the premium paid. Accordingly, the Defendant's conduct violated and continues to violate, inter alia, New York General Business Law Sections 349 and 350. The Defendant also breached and continues to breach its warranties regarding the products, says the suit. ByHeart, Inc. is an American infant formula company that operates the website. It was founded in 2016 by Mia Funt and Ron Belldegrun, and headquartered in New York City. Its first infant formula was launched in March 2022.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Brett R. Cohen, Esq. LEEDS BROWN LAW, P.C. One Old Country Road, Suite 347 Carle Place, NY 11514 Telephone: (516) 873-9550 E-mail: bcohen@leedsbrownlaw.com CAL-MAINE FOODS: Faces Suit Over Conventional Egg Price-Fixing -------------------------------------------------------------- YELL-O-GLOW CORPORATION, individually and on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC, DAYBREAK FOODS, INC., HILLANDALE FARMS CORP., ROSE ACRE FARMS, INC., VERSOVA HOLDINGS, LLC., and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-15084 (N.D. Ill., December 11, 2025) seeks treble damages, injunctive relief, and other relief, for Defendants' per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. According to the complaint, starting in January 2022, the Defendants unfairly, deceptively and unlawfully monetized an outbreak of Avian Influenza by engaging in a strategic and deliberate price fixing scheme that was intended to and did, increase Conventional Egg prices to supra-competitive levels. Each Defendant engaged in a coordinated effort to exploit the avian flu outbreak and inflationary conditions by implementing an unlawful scheme designed to secure extraordinary profits at the expense of members of the Class through the fixing, elevation, and maintenance of supra-competitive prices for Conventional Eggs, says the suit. Defendant Cal-Maine holds approximately 20% of the market share. During the relevant period, Cal-Maine experienced significant financial gains as a direct result of its unlawful increases in egg prices. These unlawful price hikes directly, proximately and unlawfully increased profits and stock value for both Cal-Maine and the other defendants, asserts the suit. The Plaintiff purchased Conventional Eggs directly from one or more Defendants during the Class Period and consequently paid an artificially inflated price for those eggs. As a result, the Plaintiff allegedly incurred an ascertainable economic loss. Cal-Maine is a producer of conventional eggs in the U.S.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Thomas Joseph Ellis, III, Esq. NOLAN LAW GROUP 20 North Clark Street, 30th Floor Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: (312) 630-4000 Facsimile: (312) 630-4011 - and - Robert J. Bonsignore, Esq. BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, PLLC 193 Plummerhill Road Belmont, NH 03220 Telephone: (781) 350-0000 Cell Phone: (781) 354-1800 Facsimile: (702) 852-5726 CAL-MAINE FOODS: Sued Over Conspiracy to Fix Fresh Egg Prices ------------------------------------------------------------- INDIA PRICE, LAKIA SESSION, and KAREN SOLOMON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., ROSE ACRE FARMS, INC., VERSOVA HOLDINGS, LLC, HILLANDALE FARMS OF PA., INC., HILLANDALE-GETTYSBURG, LLC., HILLANDALE FARMS EAST, INC., HILLANDALE FARMS, INC., DAYBREAK FOODS, INC., URNER BARRY PUBLICATIONS, INC., EGG CLEARINGHOUSE, INC., UNITED EGG PRODUCERS, and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants, Case No. 3:25-cv-01016 (W.D. Wis., December 11, 2025) is a class action complaint against the Defendants for violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, as well as various state consumer protection and antitrust laws. This action arises from Defendants' conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, and/or stabilize prices for conventional fresh shell eggs from at least as early as January 1, 2022, until Defendants' unlawful conduct and its anticompetitive effects cease to persist. As part of their unlawful agreement, Egg Producer Defendants reported inflated "assessment" of egg prices to Urner Barry. Urner Barry then published price quotes using the subjective information provided by its subscribers, including Egg Producer Defendants. It also incorporated transaction prices from an online spot market provided by Defendant ECI -- a private, members -- only spot market for buying and selling eggs. The Defendants' conspiracy has been to the detriment of Plaintiffs and members of the Consumer Indirect Purchaser Classes, and it has caused these consumers to pay supracompetitive prices for Conventional Eggs during the Class Period, says the suit. Cal-Maine, Rose Acre, Versova, Hillandale, and Daybreak are the five biggest egg producers in the United States. Urner Barry is a publisher that collects, analyzes, and disseminates detailed and current information to its customers in the egg, poultry, meat, seafood, plant protein, and related segments of the food industry.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Brian J. Dunne, Esq. Edward M. Grauman, Esq. Kaki J. Johnson, Esq. BATHAEE DUNNE LLP 901 South MoPac Expressway Barton Oaks Plaza I, Suite 300 Austin, TX 78746 Telephone: (213) 462-2772 E-mail: bdunne@bathaeedunne.com egrauman@bathaeedunne.com kjohnson@bathaeedunne.com - and - Yavar Bathaee, Esq. Andrew Chan Wolinsky, Esq. BATHAEE DUNNE LLP 445 Park Avenue, 9th Floor New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (332) 322-8835 E-mail: yavar@bathaeedunne.com awolinsky@bathaeedunne.com - and - Allison Watson, Esq. BATHAEE DUNNE LLP 3420 Bristol Street, Suite 600 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone: (213) 458-7075 E-mail: awatson@bathaeedunne.com CKC ENTERPRISES: Echols Files Suit Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ------------------------------------------------------------------ TAZINIQUE ECHOLS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated Plaintiffs v. CKC Enterprises, Inc., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-1554 (N.D. Ill., December 22, 2025) is a civil rights action against Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website, https://roolee.com, to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Echols and other blind or visually-impaired individuals. The complaint relates that Echols is interested in Defendant's Website because the company provides a broad selection of fashion, lifestyle, and home products, supported by consistent promotional deals and a loyalty program that allows customers to earn points and redeem rewards. Customers may also sign up with their email address to receive news, updates, and occasional promo codes. According to the complaint, Echols browsed and intended to make an online purchase of a T-shirt on the Website. Despite her efforts, however, Echols was denied a shopping experience like that of a sighted individual due to the Website's lack of a variety of features and accommodations. The Website contains significant access barriers that make it difficult if not impossible for blind and visually-impaired customers to use the Website. In fact, the access barriers make it impossible for blind and visually-impaired users to even complete a transaction on the Website. Because Defendant's Website is not equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, it violates the Americans with Disabilities Act, asserts the complaint. Echols seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's policies, practices, and procedures to that Defendant's Website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. This complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class Members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination. Tazinique Echols is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using her computer. CKC Enterprises, Inc. controls and operates the Website in the State of Illinois that allows the user to view women's and kids' clothing, home decor, and accessories, make purchases, and perform a variety of other functions.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367 Office: 844-731-3343 Direct: 929-442-2154 E-mail: Achan@ealg.law CNHI LLC: Fails to Safeguard Clients' Personal Info, Dudek Says --------------------------------------------------------------- JACQUELYN DUDEK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CNHI, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-00997 (M.D. Ala., December 17, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for negligence, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, and declaratory judgment/injunctive relief. The case arises from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals stored within its network systems following a data breach between April 27, 2025, and May 17, 2025. The Defendant also failed to timely notify the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals about the data breach. As a result, the private information of the Plaintiff and Class members was compromised and damaged through access by and disclosure to unknown and unauthorized third parties, says the suit. CNHI, LLC is a company that owns and operates local news, information, and advertising solutions, headquartered in Montgomery, Alabama. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jonathan S. Mann, Esq. Austin B. Whitten, Esq. PITTMAN, DUTTON, HELLUMS, BRADLEY & MANN, PC 2001 Park Place North, Suite 1100 Birmingham, AL 35203 Telephone: (205) 322-8880 Email: jonm@pittmandutton.com austinw@pittmandutton.com - and - A. Brooke Murphy, Esq. MURPHY LAW FIRM 4116 Will Rogers Pkwy., Suite 700 Oklahoma City, OK 73108 Telephone: (405) 389-4989 Email: abm@murphylegalfirm.com COMBE INC: Senior Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind ---------------------------------------------------------- FRANK SENIOR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. COMBE INCORPORATED, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-10488 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 18, 2025) alleges violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant's Web site, https://www.justformen.com/, is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, including the Plaintiff, in violation of the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Web site will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Tel: (212) 228-9795 Fax: (212) 982-6284 Email: Jeffrey@Gottlieb.legal Dana@Gottlieb.legal Michael@Gottlieb.legal CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS: Russell Seeks Technicians' Unpaid OT ----------------------------------------------------------------- DAVID RUSSELL and JOHN ORTON III on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC, CS CONTRACT SOLUTIONS, LLC d/b/a CONEXA TECHNOLOGIES, BENJAMIN SUNDERLAND, and KEITH CRISTOBAL, in their personal and professional capacities, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-00618-LEW (D. Maine, December 11, 2025) arises from the Defendants' alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Maine Wage Law. According to the complaint, the Defendants pay Plaintiffs and other employees by the hour when they assign them to complete repair work for Consolidated's customers. Although they typically work approximately 65 to 70 hours per week, the Defendants fail to pay Plaintiffs overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a workweek, instead paying them on a piece-rate and hourly basis without accounting for overtime compensation at all. Plaintiff Russell was employed by Conexa as technician from around 2020 through April 5, 2024. He was also employed in the same position by Consolidated from 2020 through February 2023. Consolidated Communications Enterprise Services, LLC is a domestic telecommunications business corporation that regularly provides telephone and Internet services to residential and business customers in Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, and across the U.S.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Stephen D. Ellis, Esq. PAUL FRANK & COLLINS, P.C. One Church Street/PO Box 1307 Burlington, VT 05402 Telephone: (802) 860-4152 E-mail: Sellis@pfclaw.com - and - Taylor J. Crabill, Esq. CRABILL PLLC 71-01 Austin Street Forest Hills, NY 11375 Telephone: (727) 335-1030 E-mail: tcrabill@crabilllawfirm.com CREATE WELLNESS: Macartney Sues Over Gummies' Deceptive Labeling ---------------------------------------------------------------- CASEY MACARTNEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CREATE WELLNESS, INC., Defendant, Case No. 5:25-cv-10713 (N.D. Cal., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of state consumer protection statutes, California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, California Unfair Competition Law, and California False Advertising Law, unjust enrichment/restitution, breach of express warranty, and breach of implied warranty of merchantability. The case arises from the Defendant's deceptive, unfair and unlawful business practices with respect to the manufacturing, marketing and sale of its Core - Create Creatine Monohydrate Gummies products. According to the complaint, the Defendant improperly, deceptively and misleadingly warranted, labeled and marketed that its products contain 4.5 grams of creatine monohydrate per serving, or 1.5 grams of creatine monohydrate per gummy. However, unbeknownst to consumers, the products do not deliver the promised dosage of creatine monohydrate. As confirmed by laboratory test results, consumers receive significantly less than the promised 4.5 grams of creatine monohydrate per serving. Had the Defendant disclosed that the products contained much less creatine monohydrate than advertised and warranted, the Plaintiff would not have purchased the products or would have paid substantially less for them. Create Wellness, Inc. is a manufacturer of creatine-forward products, with its principal place of business in New York, New York. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Trenton R. Kashima, Esq. BRYSON HARRIS SUCIU & DEMAY PLLC 19800 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 270 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: (212) 946-9389 Email: tkashima@bryson.com - and - Nick Suciu, Esq. BRYSON HARRIS SUCIU & DEMAY, PLLC 6905 Telegraph Road, Suite 115 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48301 Telephone: (616) 678-2180 Email: nsuciu@bryson.com - and - Melissa S. Weiner, Esq. PEARSON WARSHAW, LLP 328 Barry Avenue S., Suite 200 Wayzata, MI 55391 Telephone: (612) 389-0600 Facsimile: (612) 389-0610 CURRICULUM ASSOCIATES: Faces Suit Over Data Privacy Violations -------------------------------------------------------------- M.C. 1 and M.C. 2, by and through their legal guardian NICOLE REISBERG; and M.C. 3 and M.C. 4, by and through their legal guardian LILA BYOCK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. CURRICULUM ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-13942-FDS (D. Mass., Dec. 22, 2025) alleges violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act. According to the complaint, the Defendant's "i-Ready" suite of products, which provide student assessment, instruction, and data analytics, creates and extracts reams of personal information from K–12 students. Using that data, the Defendant creates detailed data profiles of students that are used to predict and influence their behavior and guide decision-making about them. It further uses that information for commercial purposes, including developing, marketing, and delivering its own products. Likewise, the i-Ready products generate, record, and transmit personal information about students in real time to third parties, without the knowledge or consent of the students or their parents, says the suit. Curriculum Associates, LLC designs and develops educational platform, as well as offers assessment tools and learning solutions. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Karen Dahlberg O'Connell, Esq. ALMEIDA LAW GROUP LLC 157 Columbus Avenue, 4th Floor New York, NY 10023 Telephone: (347) 395-5666 Email: Karen@almeidalawgroup.com - and - Julie U. Liddell, Esq. W. Andrew Lidell, Esq. EDTECH LAW CENTER PLLC P.O. Box 300488 Austin, TX 78705 Telephone: (737) 351-5855 Email: julie.liddell@edtech.law andrew.liddell@edtech.law - and - Andrew R. Tate, Esq. PEIFFER WOLF CARR KANE CONWAY & WISE LLP 235 Peachtree St. NE, Suite 400 Atlanta, GA 30303 Telephone: (314) 669-3600 Email: atate@peifferwolf.com - and - Lori G. Feldman, Esq. GEORGE FELDMAN MCDONALD, PLLC 102 Half Moon Bay Drive Croton-on-Hudson, NY 10520 Telephone: (917) 983-9321 Email: LFeldman@4-Justice.com CUT 432: Blind Users Can't Access Website, Hernandez Suit Alleges ----------------------------------------------------------------- YUDY HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CUT 432, LLC, D/B/A CUT 432, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-25941-AHS (S.D. Fla., December 17, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and trespass. According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually impaired persons. The Defendant's website contains access barriers which hinder the Plaintiff and Class members to enjoy the benefits of their online goods, content, and services offered to the public through the website. The Plaintiff and Class members seek permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that its website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals. Cut 432, LLC, doing business as Cut 432, is a company that sells online goods and services in Florida. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Diego German Mendez, Esq. MENDEZ LAW OFFICES, PLLC P.O. Box 228630 Miami, FL 33172 Telephone: (305) 264-9090 Facsimile: (305) 809-8474 Email: info@mendezlawoffices.com - and - Richard J. Adams, Esq. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, PA 6500 Cowpen Road, Suite 101 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Telephone: (786) 290-1963 Facsimile: (305) 824-3868 Email: radamslaw7@gmail.com DELOITTE & TOUCHE: $34MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Feb. 26 ---------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 98 PENSION FUND on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP; DELOITTE LLP, Defendants. Case No. 3:19-cv-3304-JDA CLASS ACTION TO: ALL PERSONS WHO PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED SCANA CORPORATION ("SCANA") COMMON STOCK DURING THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 26, 2016 THROUGH DECEMBER 20, 2017, INCLUSIVE (THE "SETTLEMENT CLASS") YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, that a hearing will be held on February 26, 2026 at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Jacquelyn D. Austin at the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Courtroom 6200 of the Carrol A. Campbell, Jr. U.S. Courthouse, 250 East North Street, Greenville, SC 29601, to determine: (1) whether the proposed settlement of the claims in the action (the "Action") for the principal amount of $34,000,000 for the Settlement Class should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (2) whether a Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal should be entered by the Court dismissing the Action with prejudice; (3) whether the proposed Plan of Allocation should be approved as fair and reasonable; (4) whether Lead Counsel's application for an award of attorneys' fees not to exceed 33.33% of the Settlement Fund and payment of Litigation Expenses incurred in connection with the Action should be approved; and (5) any other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in connection with the Settlement. IF YOU PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED SCANA COMMON STOCK DURING THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 26, 2016 THROUGH DECEMBER 20, 2017, INCLUSIVE, YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE SETTLEMENT OF THIS ACTION. You may obtain copies of a detailed Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action ("Notice") and a copy of the Proof of Claim and Release form by writing to Deloitte SCANA Securities Litigation, PO Box 2299, Portland, OR 97208-2299, visiting www.DeloitteSCANASecuritiesLitigation.com, or calling the claims administrator at 877-768-7047. To be eligible for payment from the Settlement, you must be a Settlement Class member and either (1) had an eligible claim in the prior settlement against SCANA in In re SCANA Corporation Securities Litigation, Case No. 3:17-cv-02616 (D.S.C. ("SCANA I"),1 or (2) submit a Proof of Claim and Release postmarked no later than April 16, 2026, establishing that you are entitled to recovery. If you purchased or otherwise acquired SCANA common stock and you desire to be excluded from the Settlement Class, you must submit a request for exclusion such that it is received no later than February 5, 2026, in the manner and form explained in the detailed Notice referred to above. All Settlement Class members who do not timely and validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class will be bound by any judgment entered in the Action pursuant to the applicable stipulation of Settlement, whether or not you submit a Proof of Claim. Any objection to the Settlement must be mailed to each of the following recipients no later than February 5, 2026: Clerk's Office United States District Court District of South Carolina (Greenville Division) Clerk of the Court Carrol A. Campbell, Jr. U.S. Courthouse 250 East North Street Greenville, SC 29601 Lead Counsel Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC Laura H. Posner 88 Pine Street, 14th Floor New York, NY 10005 202-408-3605 deloittescanasettlement@cohenmilstein.com Representative Counsel for Defendants Milbank LLP Jed M. Schwartz 55 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 212-530-5283 jschwartz@milbank.com DO NOT CALL OR WRITE THE COURT, THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE COURT, DEFENDANTS, OR THEIR COUNSEL REGARDING THIS NOTICE. If you have questions about the Settlement, you may contact the claims administrator at the address or phone number listed above. Dated: January 2, 2026 By Order of the Court United States District Court District of South Carolina (Greenville Division) If you filed an accepted claim in SCANA I and do not wish to exclude yourself from the class, the Claims Administrator possesses the information needed to calculate your claim for payment in connection with the SCANA II settlement without further action. URL: www.DeloitteSCANASecuritiesLitigation.com DKGA/WUC LP: Faces Garcia Suit Over Disabled's Access Barriers -------------------------------------------------------------- ERIK GARCIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. DKGA/WUC, LP, Defendant, Case No. 4:25-cv-06108 (S.D. Tex., December 17, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the ADA's Accessibility Guidelines, 28 C.F.R. Part 36 (ADAAG). According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its facilities to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other persons with disabilities. The Defendant has continued to discriminate against people who are disabled in ways that block them from access and use of its property and business. The Plaintiff and Class members seek injunctive relief to remove the existing architectural barriers to the physically disabled when such removal is readily achievable for the place of public accommodation. DKGA/WUC, LP is a property owner and operator located in Texas. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Douglas S. Schapiro, Esq. THE SCHAPIRO LAW GROUP, PL 7301-A W. Palmetto Park Rd., #100A Boca Raton, FL 33433 Telephone: (561) 807-7388 Email: schapiro@schapirolawgroup.com ENVOY AIR: Parks Balks at Failure to Protect Highly Sensitive Data ------------------------------------------------------------------ KHIANNA PARKS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ENVOY AIR INC. and ORACLE CORPORATION, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-02034 (W.D. Tex., December 11, 2025) is a class action arising from Defendants' failure to protect highly sensitive data. Envoy used Defendant Oracle's EBS system to collect, manage, and store its current and former employees' personally identifiable information. As such, Oracle stores a litany of highly sensitive PII about Envoy's current and former employees, including Plaintiff. But such PII was inadequately protected and thus exposed to cybercriminals in a data breach. The Defendants had no effective means to prevent, detect, stop, or mitigate breaches of its systems -- thereby allowing cybercriminals unrestricted access to its current and former employees' PII, says the suit. The Defendants' alleged failures placed the Class' PII in a vulnerable position -- rendering them easy targets for cybercriminals. Envoy Air is a wholly owned subsidiary of American Airlines Group. Oracle Corp. is a multinational technology and enterprise software firm.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raina C. Borrelli, Esq. STRAUSS BORRELLI PLLC One Magnificent Mile 980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago IL, 60611 Telephone: (872) 263-1100 Facsimile: (872) 263-1109 E-mail: raina@straussborrelli.com - and - J. Gerard Stranch, IV, Esq. Grayson Wells, Esq. STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC The Freedom Center 223 Rosa L. Parkes Avenue, Suite 200 Nashville, TN 37203 Telephone: (615) 254-8801 E-mail: gstranch@stranchlaw.com gwella@stranchlaw.com F & J PINE: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Bruno Alleges ---------------------------------------------------- JORGE BRUNO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. F & J PINE RESTAURANT LLC d/b/a F & J PINE RESTAURANT; 4 A KIDS LLC d/b/a F & J PINE RESTAURANT; and ANTHONY BASTONE, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-10599 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 22, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Bruno was employed by the Defendants as a staff. F & J Pine Restaurant LLC d/b/a F & J Pine Restaurant operates an Italian restaurant in Bronx, New York. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael J. Borrelli, Esq. Alexander T. Coleman, Esq. BORRELLI & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. 910 Franklin Avenue, Suite 200 Garden City, NY 11530 Telephone: (516) 248-5550 Facsimile: (516) 248-6027 FIRST PREMIER: Clarke Files Suit Over TCPA Violation ---------------------------------------------------- NICHOLAS CLARKE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. FIRST PREMIER HOME WARRANTY CORP., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-07012-NRM-LKE (E.D.N.Y., December 22, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for its persistent disregard for federal law, specifically, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"). The complaint relates that to avoid unsolicited telemarketing calls, Plaintiff personally placed his telephone number on the National Do-Not-Call Registry in January 2025. Since then, Plaintiff has not removed his telephone number from the National Do-Not-Call Registry. The Plaintiff has never had a business relationship with Defendant. The Defendant (or its third-party agents) engages in telemarketing campaigns to sell its home warranty plan service. The complaint alleges that on April 4, 2024, at 12:44 p.m., Defendant used the telephone number (713) 260-4588 and sent Plaintiff a text message on his cellular phone. The Plaintiff responded to Defendant that he was no longer interested in Defendant's services. Despite this, on April 5, 2024, at 3:31 p.m., Plaintiff received a second text message on his cellular telephone from Defendant. On April 8, 2024, at 11:13 a.m., Plaintiff received another text message on his cellular telephone from Defendant. In an attempt to get the text messages to stop, Plaintiff replied "Stop" to Defendant's message. Defendant responded that Plaintiff was unsubscribed from marketing and "No more messages will be sent". However, despite Plaintiff's attempts to get Defendant's text messages to stop, Defendant continued to send text message solicitations to Plaintiff's telephone number. The aforementioned telephone solicitations to Plaintiff were unwanted, nonconsensual encounters, says the suit. Plaintiff and all members of the Class have been harmed by the acts of Defendant because their privacy has been violated and they were annoyed and harassed, it adds. Plaintiff Nicholas Clarke, is a natural person and a citizen of South Carolina. Defendant First Premier Home Warranty is a home warranty company that provides warranty coverage to repair and replacement costs on major home systems and appliances. The Plaintiff is represented by: Linda H Joseph, Esq. SCHRODER JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES LLP 394 Franklin Street, 2nd Floor Buffalo, NY 14202 Telephone: 716-881-4900 Facsimile: 716-881-4909 E-mail: ljoseph@sjalegal.com - and - Cassandra P. Miller, Esq. STRAUSS BORRELLI PLLC One Magnificent Mile 980 N Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago IL, 60611 Telephone: (872) 263-1100 Facsimile: (872) 263-1109 E-mail: cmiller@straussborrelli.com - and - Anthony Paronich, Esq. 350 Lincoln St., Suite 2400 Hingham, MA 02043 Telephone: (617) 485-0018 Facsimile: 508-318-8100 E-mail: anthony@paronichlaw.com FOURTHSTREETFOODS: Mason Sues Over Mass Layoff w/out Proper Notice ------------------------------------------------------------------ ROBERT MASON, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated Plaintiff v. FOURTHSTREETFOODS, INC. Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-02370-KMN (M.D. Pa., December 10, 2025) is a class action complaint brought under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act by the Plaintiff on his own behalf and on behalf of the other similarly situated persons against Defendant, their employer for WARN Act purposes. According to the complaint, the Defendant abruptly terminated at least 252 employees, including Plaintiff, unilaterally and without proper notice to employees or staff. Specifically, the Plaintiff was terminated from a worksite located in Charleroi, Pennsylvania on November 6, 2025, as part of a mass layoff without proper notice. The Plaintiff and other similarly situated employees should have received the full protection afforded by the WARN Act, says the suit. Fourth Street Foods manufactures frozen food products for branded and private label retainers throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Patrick Howard, Esq. SALTZ MONGELUZZI & BENDESKY, P.C. 1650 Market Street, 52nd Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 496-8282 E-mail: phoward@smbb.com - and - J. Gerard Stranch, IV, Esq. STRANCH, JENNINGS, & GARVEY, PLLC 223 Rosa Parks Ave., Suite 200 Nashville, TN 37203 Telephone: (615) 254-8801 Facsimile: (615) 255-5419 E-mail: gstranch@stranchlaw.com - and - Lynn A. Toops, Esq. COHENMALAD, LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Telephone: (317) 636-6481 E-mail: ltoops@cohenmalad.com - and - Samuel J. Strauss, Esq. Raina C. Borrelli, Esq. STRAUSS BORRELLI, LLP 613 Williamson St., Suite 201 Madison, WI 53703 Telephone: (608) 237-1775 Facsimile: (608) 509-4423 E-mail: sam@straussborrelli.com raina@straussborrelli.com GOODER FOODS: Moran Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind ------------------------------------------------------------ WASHINGTON MORAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. GOODER FOODS, INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-10486 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 18, 2025) alleges violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant's Web site, www.goodles.com, is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, including the Plaintiff, in violation of the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's Web site will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. Gooder Foods, Inc., doing business as Goodles, provides packaged food products. The Company offers wide range of noodles, pasta as well as specializes in merchandises and gifts. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Tel: (212) 228-9795 Fax: (212) 982-6284 Email: Jeffrey@Gottlieb.legal Dana@Gottlieb.legal Michael@Gottlieb.legal GOOGLE LLC: Rose Alleges Unlawful Google Drive Subscription Policy ------------------------------------------------------------------ DEVIN ROSE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. GOOGLE LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 25STCV36223 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., December 11, 2025) is a consumer class complaint seeking restitution of all monies unlawfully earned by Defendants for the sale of their Google Drive subscription in violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act and the California Unfair Competition Law. The complaint seeks to remedy Plaintiff who purchased a Drive subscription, resulting from decades of Defendants' on-going failure to warn and otherwise negligent, reckless and/or knowing sale of the Drive without providing the notice required by law. This action further seeks to remedy Defendants' unfair, unlawful, and fraudulent business practices, and to ensure that all California consumers are warned that when they purchase a Drive subscription, their Drive files can be deleted without warning. The Plaintiff purchased a Drive subscription enticed by Defendants' advertising that it was a secure cloud storage for Plaintiff's files. To Plaintiff's surprise, however, his Drive files were deleted without warning and Defendants could not provide any solution to restore the deleted files, says the suit. Google LLC is a multinational technology company focusing on online advertising, search engine technology, cloud computing, computer software, quantum computing, e-commerce, consumer electronics, and artificial intelligence, among others.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mark D. Potter, Esq. James M. Treglio, Esq. POTTER HANDY LLP 100 Pine St., Ste 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 534-1911 Facsimile: (888) 422-5191 E-mail: mark@potterhandy.com jimt@potterhandy.com HPS ADVISORY: Giusti Sues Over Breach of Insurance Contract ----------------------------------------------------------- ERNEST J. GIUSTI, III, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. HPS ADVISORY SERVICES LLC, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-02518 (E.D. La., December 17, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, violation of La. R.S. 22:978, and unjust enrichment. According to the complaint, HPS breached its duty under each insurance agreement by, without limitation, failing to keep its promise to fulfill its fiduciary duties to policyholders, abide by applicable state laws, provide a thorough, fair, and objective investigation of each submitted claim prior to a claim denial, and to provide written statements to the Plaintiffs and members of the proposed class, accurately listing all bases for the denial of claims and the factual and legal bases for each reason given for such denial. HPS additionally breached agreement by, without limitation, failing to properly pay third-party providers relative to claims made by the proposed class members and failing to notify the Plaintiffs and members of the proposed class that their policy was subject to cancellation and/or was being cancelled prior to its cancellation in fact. As a result of HPS' breach of contract, the Plaintiffs and members of the proposed class have suffered damages, says the suit. HPS Advisory Services LLC is the investment advisory arm of HPS Investment Partners, doing business in Louisiana. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jacob D. Young, Esq. Fred L. Herman, Esq. HERMAN & YOUNG 1200 Energy Centre 1100 Poydras Street New Orleans, LA 70163 Telephone: (504) 238-5050 Facsimile: (504) 321-0576 Email: jacob@hermanandyoung.com fred@hermanandyoung.com - and - Megan Kiefer, Esq. Anna M. Singleton, Esq. KIEFER & KIEFER 1100 Poydras St., Suite 1300 New Orleans, LA 70163 Telephone: (504) 828-3313 Facsimile: (504) 828-0024 Email: megan@kieferlaw.com HUGHES TRIM: Maclin Suit Alleges Violation of FCRA -------------------------------------------------- DAVID MACLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. HUGHES TRIM L.L.C., Defendant, Case No. 3:25-cv-01558 (M.D. Fla., Dec. 18, 2025) alleges violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The case is assigned to Harvey E Schlesinger, and referred to Magistrate Monte C Richardson. Hughes Trim L.L.C. specializes in carpentry, molding, trim, custom built-in shelving, window, and door installation, shutters, and stair systems. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jessica Wallace, Esq. Jayson Watkins, Esq. SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 20200 W. Dixie Highway, Ste. 902 Aventura, FL 33180 Telephone: (509) 822-2463 Facsimile: (646) 417-5967 Email: jwallace@sirillp.com jwatkins@sirillp.com INHOSPITAL PHYSICIANS: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Seward Says ------------------------------------------------------------- BONIFIA SEWARD and EMILY CHO, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. INHOSPITAL PHYSICIANS CORP., Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-07133 (E.D. Pa., Dec. 18, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Plaintiffs were employed by the Defendant as nurse practitioners. Inhospital Physicians Corp. offers professional healthcare management and solutions. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Michael Murphy, Esq. Michael Groh, Esq. MURPHY LAW GROUP, LLC Eight Penn Center, Suite 2000 1628 John F. Kennedy Blvd. Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (267) 273-1054 Facsimile: (215) 525-0210 Email: murphy@phillyemploymentlawyer.com mgroh@phillyemploymentlawyer.com INSPIRE MEDICAL: Indiana Sues Over Drop in Share Price ------------------------------------------------------ INDIANA PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. INSPIRE MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; TIMOTHY P. HERBERT; RICHARD J. BUCHHOLZ; and CARLTON W. WEATHERBY, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-10620 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 22, 2025) alleges violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). According to the complaint, the Defendants represented that theye were prepared for the Inspire V launch and that the launch was progressing well were false. In truth, Defendants knew that they were facing several critical issues with the Inspire V launch, including lack of demand and problems with reimbursement codes, and getting treatment centers to complete training and install the prerequisite IT program, SleepSync. The truth emerged on August 4, 2025, when Inspire announced it was lowering its full year earnings per share guidance by 80%, revealing that it had "encountered certain headwinds that slowed our efforts to transition customers to Inspire V." According to Inspire, these headwinds included centers not completing "the training, contracting, and onboarding criteria required prior to the purchase and implant of Inspire V," as well as challenges "related to adoption of CPT code 64568 for Inspire V for Medicare patients." As a result of these disclosures, the price of Inspire common stock declined by $42.04 per share, or 32.4%, says the suit. As a result of Defendants' wrongful acts and omissions, which caused the precipitous decline in the market value of the Company's common stock, Plaintiff and other Class members have suffered significant damages. Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. operates as a medical technology company. The Company develops implantable neurostimulation systems to treat obstructive sleep apnea. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Hannah Ross, Esq. Scott R. Foglietta, Esq. BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 554-1400 Facsimile: (212) 554-1444 Email: hannah@blbglaw.com scott.foglietta@blbglaw.com JR&F BUILDERS: Underpays Construction Workers, Perez Suit Says -------------------------------------------------------------- LEONARDO PEREZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. JR&F BUILDERS CORP. and JOSE RAFAEL GUAMAN, individually, Defendants, Case No. 7:25-cv-10225 (S.D.N.Y., December 10, 2025) is a collective action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, on behalf of Plaintiff and all similarly situated construction workers employed by Defendants who were not paid overtime pay in compliance with the law. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff regularly worked more than 40 hours per week but did not receive overtime premium pay at one and a half times his regular hourly rate. The Defendants failed to keep accurate records, failed to provide pay stubs, intentionally failed to pay overtime, and willfully violated the FLSA. The Plaintiff seeks unpaid overtime and spread of hours wages, liquidated damages, reasonable attorneys' fees, and costs. The Plaintiff worked for the Defendants as a construction worker from approximately July 2023 through November 23, 2025. JR&F Builders Corp. is a construction company based in New York.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jacob Aronauer, Esq. THE LAW OFFICES OF JACOB ARONAUER 250 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, NY 10007 Telephone: (212) 323-6980 LONG ISLAND: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Natale Alleges ------------------------------------------------------ DANIELLE NATALE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. THE LONG ISLAND MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELING GROUP, P.C.; KRISTEN HERBERT-DELANEY; and KATHERINE ZUCCARRO-D'ANGELO, Defendants, Case No. 2:25-cv-06960 (E.D.N.Y., Dec. 18, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Natale was employed by the Defendants as a mental health counselor. The Long Island Mental Health Counseling Group, P.C. is a private therapy practice located in Bethpage, New York. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Taimur Alamgir, Esq. TA LEGAL GROUP PLLC 205 E Main St, Suite 3-2 Huntington, NY 11743 Telephone: (914) 552-2669 Email: tim@talegalgroup.com MADISON MANAGEMENT: Quiroz Privacy Suit Removed to E.D. Wis. ------------------------------------------------------------ The case styled Marcelino Quiroz and Tracy C. Quiroz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Madison Management Services, LLC and Aryming Asset Management, LLC, Defendants, Case No. 2024CV000440, consolidated with Case No. 2024CV000440, was removed from the Circuit Court of Washington County, Wisconsin to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on December 10, 2025. The Clerk of the Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-01947-SCD to the proceeding. In their Complaint, which is a class action that seeks certification of a class of purportedly more than 1,500 people, the Plaintiffs assert various causes of action against Aryming based on purported invasions of privacy and fraud. Madison Management Services, LLC provides servicing, asset management, loss mitigation and real estate owned management for investors of residential mortgages. Aryming Asset Management, LLC is a New Jersey-based fund management firm.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Blake A. Strautins, Esq. KLUEVER LAW GROUP, LLC 200 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1880 Chicago, IL 60601 Telephone: (312) 236-0077 E-mail: bstrautins@klueverlawgroup.com MARQUIS SOFTWARE: Fails to Secure Personal Info, Rhinehart Says --------------------------------------------------------------- CONNOR RHINEHART, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MARQUIS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, Defendant, Case No. 4:25-cv-01381 (E.D. Tex., December 11, 2025) is a class action against Defendant Marquis for its failure to properly secure and safeguard Plaintiff's and other similarly situated individuals personally identifying information, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and financial information. The Plaintiff and Class Members are individuals who were required to indirectly and/or directly provide Defendant with their private information. By collecting, storing, and maintaining Plaintiff's and Class Members' private information, Marquis has a resulting duty to secure, maintain, protect, and safeguard the private information that it collects and stores against unauthorized access and disclosure through reasonable and adequate data security measures. Despite Marquis's duty to safeguard the private information of Plaintiff and Class Members, their private information in Defendant's possession was compromised when an unauthorized party gained access to Defendant's network and exfiltrated sensitive data stored therein on or about August 14, 2025. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's failure to implement and follow basic security procedures, Plaintiff's and Class Members' private information is now in the hands of cybercriminals. The Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, alleges claims for negligence, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment and declaratory judgment arising from the data breach. Marquis Software Solutions is a digital and physical marketing and communications vendor for financial institution across the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Emil Lippe, Jr., Esq. LAW OFFICES OF LIPPE & ASSOCIATES Park Place at Turtle Creek 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1250 Dallas, TX 75219 Telephone: (214) 855-1850 Facsimile: (214) 720-6075 E-mail: emil@texaslaw.com - and - Gerald D. Wells, III, Esq. Stephen E. Connolly, Esq. LYNCH CARPENTER, LLP 1760 Market Street, Suite 600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (267) 609-6910 Facsimile: (267) 609-6955 E-mail: jerry@lcllp.com steve@lcllp.com MOMENTUM SOLAR: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Oguekwe Suit Claims --------------------------------------------------------------- BASIL OGUEKWE; and DANIEL PONTES-MACEDO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. MOMENTUM SOLAR, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 3:25-cv-18758 (D.N.J., Dec. 18, 2025) seeks to stop the Defendants' practice of making unsolicited calls. Momentum Solar, LLC is a solar power company offering services such as engineering, instillation , and activation of solar powered energy. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Patrick Howard, Esq. SALTZ MONGELUZZI & BENDESKY, P.C. 8000 Sagemore Dr., Suite 8303 Marlton, NJ 08053 Telephone: (215) 575-3895 Email: phoward@smbb.com - and - Carly M. Roman, Esq. STRAUSS BORRELLI PLLC 980 N Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago IL, 60611 Telephone: (872) 263-1100 Facsimile: (872) 263-1109 Email: croman@straussborrelli.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Faces Cano Suit Over Harmful Herbicide Roundup ---------------------------------------------------------------- PEDRO CANO, JR., on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-362 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The defective condition of Roundup was due in part to the fact that it was not accompanied by proper warnings regarding its carcinogenic qualities and possible side effects, including, but not limited to, developing Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a result of exposure and use, says the suit. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Faces Hostetler Suit Over Defective Herbicide --------------------------------------------------------------- JANET HOSTETLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-400 MON (Del. Super., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for negligence, strict products liability, breach of implied warranties, and breach of consumer protection, unfair, and/or deceptive trade practices statutes. The case arises from the personal injuries sustained by the Plaintiff and similarly situated consumers as a result of their exposure to the Defendants' herbicide Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate. According to the complaint, Roundup is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff and the Class seek compensatory damages as a result of the actions and inactions of the Defendants. Monsanto Company is an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation with a principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Bayer CropScience LP is a manufacturer of crop protection products based in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Foster Sues Over Harmful Herbicide Roundup ------------------------------------------------------------ SUSAN JEAN FOSTER, on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-368 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff's injuries, like those striking thousands of similarly situated victims across the U.S., were avoidable. As a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup, the Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, says the suit. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Gooch Sues Over Harmful Herbicide Roundup ----------------------------------------------------------- AUDETTE GOOCH, on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-354 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The defective condition of Roundup was due in part to the fact that it was not accompanied by proper warnings regarding its carcinogenic qualities and possible side effects, including, but not limited to, developing Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a result of exposure and use, says the suit. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Herbicide Roundup "Defective," Coones Alleges --------------------------------------------------------------- DEIRDRE COONES, on behalf of similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-360 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages as a result of his use of, and exposure to, Roundup which caused or was a substantial contributing factor in causing him to suffer from cancer, specifically Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Herbicide Roundup "Defective," Johnson Says ------------------------------------------------------------- NANCY JOHNSON, on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-357 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages as a result of his use of, and exposure to, Roundup which caused or was a substantial contributing factor in causing him to suffer from cancer, specifically Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Herbicide Roundup "Defective," Montgomery Says ---------------------------------------------------------------- RANDY MONTGOMERY, on behalf of similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-356 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages as a result of his use of, and exposure to, Roundup which caused or was a substantial contributing factor in causing him to suffer from cancer, specifically Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Herbicide Roundup "Defective," Plant Claims ------------------------------------------------------------- TED PLANT, on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-365 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages as a result of his use of, and exposure to, Roundup which caused or was a substantial contributing factor in causing him to suffer from cancer, specifically Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Kuhns Sues Over Defective Herbicide Roundup ------------------------------------------------------------- TAMMY KUHNS, on behalf of similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-367 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The defective condition of Roundup was due in part to the fact that it was not accompanied by proper warnings regarding its carcinogenic qualities and possible side effects, including, but not limited to, developing Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a result of exposure and use, says the suit. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Mari Sues Over Roundup's Impact to Human Health ----------------------------------------------------------------- SHAWN MARI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-402 MON (Del. Super., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for negligence, strict products liability, breach of implied warranties, and breach of consumer protection, unfair, and/or deceptive trade practices statutes. The case arises from the personal injuries sustained by the Plaintiff and similarly situated consumers as a result of their exposure to the Defendants' herbicide Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate. According to the complaint, Roundup is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff and the Class seek compensatory damages as a result of the actions and inactions of the Defendants. Monsanto Company is an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation with a principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Bayer CropScience LP is a manufacturer of crop protection products based in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Markets Defective Herbicide, Lockhart Claims -------------------------------------------------------------- M LOCKHART, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-374 MON (Del. Super., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for negligence, strict products liability, breach of implied warranties, and breach of consumer protection, unfair, and/or deceptive trade practices statutes. The case arises from the personal injuries sustained by the Plaintiff and similarly situated consumers as a result of their exposure to the Defendants' herbicide Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate. According to the complaint, Roundup is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff and the Class seek compensatory damages as a result of the actions and inactions of the Defendants. Monsanto Company is an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation with a principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Bayer CropScience LP is a manufacturer of crop protection products based in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Morris Sues Over Sale of Defective Herbicide -------------------------------------------------------------- NICOLE MORRIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-372 MON (Del. Super., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for negligence, strict products liability, breach of implied warranties, and breach of consumer protection, unfair, and/or deceptive trade practices statutes. The case arises from the personal injuries sustained by the Plaintiff and similarly situated consumers as a result of their exposure to the Defendants' herbicide Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate. According to the complaint, Roundup is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff and the Class seek compensatory damages as a result of the actions and inactions of the Defendants. Monsanto Company is an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation with a principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Bayer CropScience LP is a manufacturer of crop protection products based in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Oliphant Sues Over Herbicide's Health Risks ------------------------------------------------------------- BRENDA OLIPHANT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-375 MON (Del. Super., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for negligence, strict products liability, breach of implied warranties, and breach of consumer protection, unfair, and/or deceptive trade practices statutes. The case arises from the personal injuries sustained by the Plaintiff and similarly situated consumers as a result of their exposure to the Defendants' herbicide Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate. According to the complaint, Roundup is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff and the Class seek compensatory damages as a result of the actions and inactions of the Defendants. Monsanto Company is an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation with a principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Bayer CropScience LP is a manufacturer of crop protection products based in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Roundup Herbicide "Defective," Lewis Suit Says ---------------------------------------------------------------- STANLEY LEWIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-413 MON (Del. Super., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for negligence, strict products liability, breach of implied warranties, and breach of consumer protection, unfair, and/or deceptive trade practices statutes. The case arises from the personal injuries sustained by the Plaintiff and similarly situated consumers as a result of their exposure to the Defendants' herbicide Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate. According to the complaint, Roundup is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff and the Class seek compensatory damages as a result of the actions and inactions of the Defendants. Monsanto Company is an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation with a principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Bayer CropScience LP is a manufacturer of crop protection products based in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Roundup Product Causes Cancer, Palmiero Claims ---------------------------------------------------------------- ELIO PALMIERO, on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-358 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages as a result of his use of, and exposure to, Roundup which caused or was a substantial contributing factor in causing him to suffer from cancer, specifically Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Scar Sues Over Defective Herbicide Roundup ------------------------------------------------------------ DWAYNE SCAR, on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-364 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff's injuries, like those striking thousands of similarly situated victims across the U.S., were avoidable. As a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Roundup, the Plaintiff developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, says the suit. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Sells Hazardous Herbicide, Newlin Suit Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------------- DARLEEN NEWLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-379 MON (Del. Super., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for negligence, strict products liability, breach of implied warranties, and breach of consumer protection, unfair, and/or deceptive trade practices statutes. The case arises from the personal injuries sustained by the Plaintiff and similarly situated consumers as a result of their exposure to the Defendants' herbicide Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate. According to the complaint, Roundup is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The Plaintiff and the Class seek compensatory damages as a result of the actions and inactions of the Defendants. Monsanto Company is an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation with a principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Bayer CropScience LP is a manufacturer of crop protection products based in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MONSANTO COMPANY: Sjonvall Sues Over Defective Herbicide Roundup ---------------------------------------------------------------- JONATHAN SJONVALL, on behalf of similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Defendants, Case No. N25C-12-355 MON (Del. Super., December 15, 2025) is a class action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate. The Plaintiff maintains that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce, and has lacked, at all relevant times, proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. The defective condition of Roundup was due in part to the fact that it was not accompanied by proper warnings regarding its carcinogenic qualities and possible side effects, including, but not limited to, developing Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma as a result of exposure and use, says the suit. Monsanto Company was an American agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation founded in 1901 and headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 655-4600 E-mail: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 376-6360 Facsimile: (888) 875-2889 E-mail: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com MOUTH WATCHERS: Faces Murphy Suit Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ----------------------------------------------------------------- JAMES MURPHY, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MOUTH WATCHERS, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-10252 (S.D.N.Y., December 10, 2025) is a civil rights action against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its interactive website, www.mouthwatchers.com, to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York City Human Rights Law, and New York State General Business Law. During Plaintiff's visits to the website, the last occurring on November 26, 2025, in an attempt to purchase Doctor Plotka's Mouth Watchers Travel Kit from Defendant and to view the information on the Website, the Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers that denied Plaintiff a shopping experience similar to that of a sighted person and full and equal access to the goods and services offered to the public and made available to the public. He was unable to locate pricing and was not able to add the item to the cart due to broken links, pictures without alternate attributes and other barriers on Defendant's website, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that its website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers. Mouth Watchers, LLC operates the website that offers oral healthcare products.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Telephone: (212) 228-9795 Facsimile: (212) 982-6284 E-mail: Jeffrey@Gottlieb.legal Dana@Gottlieb.legal Michael@Gottlieb.legal O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE: Fails to Stop Work Discrimination, Hall Says ----------------------------------------------------------------- SELITA HALL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES, INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-02145-CLM (N.D. Ala., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case arises from the Defendant's failure or refusal to take prompt and necessary action to remedy the discrimination against the Plaintiff and prevent future harm. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff suffered discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in the workplace. Due to lack of action by the Defendant, the Plaintiff had no other option than to end her employment with the Defendant. As a result of the Defendant's unlawful conduct, the Plaintiff suffered and continues to suffer loss of wages, loss of career opportunities, sever emotional distress, loss of self-esteem, and other damages. O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. is an auto parts retailer based in Montgomery, Alabama. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: D. Jeremy Schatz, Esq. Jon-Kaden Mullen, Esq. VIRTUS LAW GROUP 2017 Morris Avenue, Ste. 100 Birmingham, AL 35203 Email: js@vlgal.com jm@vlgal.com OKUMA FISHING: Website Inaccessible to Blind Users, Evans Says -------------------------------------------------------------- JAMES EVANS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Plaintiff v. Okuma Fishing Tackle Corporation, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-14997 (N.D. Ill., December 10, 2025) is a civil rights action against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website, okumafishingusa.com, to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Plaintiff Evans has made an attempt to complete a purchase on Okumafishingusa.com. On October 16, 2025, during the Plaintiff's search on Google for fishing equipment, he came across the Defendant's website and further explore the site with the intention of making a purchase. However, while navigating the website, he encountered multiple accessibility issues. The site lacked a "skip to content" link, making it challenging for him to bypass repetitive blocks of information and access the main content of the homepage efficiently. He also found multiple repetitive links that were ambiguous and failed to clearly convey the purpose or destination of each link. These access barriers have caused the website to be inaccessible to, and not independently usable by, blind and visually-impaired persons, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Okuma Fishing Tackle's policies, practices, and procedures so that its website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. This complaint also seeks compensatory damages to compensate Class members for having been subjected to unlawful discrimination. Okuma Fishing Tackle Corporation operates the website that offers fishing equipment including range rods, reels, lures, apparel and accessories.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Alison Chan, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (844) 731-3343 Direct: (929) 442-2154 E-mail: Achan@ealg.law ORACLE CORP: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Long Alleges ------------------------------------------------------- YAMMARII LONG; JOSE GUARDADO; and NICOLE HUGHES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ORACLE CORPORATION; LKQ CORPORATION; THE UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC., Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-02072 (W.D. Tex., Dec. 18, 2025) is an action against the Defendants for their failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally identifiable information of Plaintiffs and Class Members. According to the complaint, on September 2025, a cybercriminal group known as Cl0p began notifying company executives from compromised Oracle EBS accounts that it had accessed and exfiltrated PII from their organization (hereafter referred to as the "Data Breach"). The Data Breach was a direct result of Defendants' failure to implement adequate and reasonable data protection procedures necessary to protect consumers' PII from a foreseeable and preventable risk of unauthorized disclosure. Had Defendants remedied the vulnerabilities in its information technology environment, and implemented administrative, technical, and physical controls consistent with industry best practices, this Data Breach could have been prevented. The Defendants' conduct resulted in the unauthorized disclosure of Plaintiffs' Private Information to unknown cybercriminals. The unauthorized disclosure of Plaintiffs' PII constitutes an invasion of a legally protected privacy interest, that is traceable to the Defendants' failure to adequately secure the PII in their custody, and has resulted in actual, particularized, and concrete harm to the Plaintiffs. Oracle Corporation supplies software for enterprise information management. The Company offers databases and relational servers, application development and decision support tools, and enterprise business applications. Oracle's software runs on network computers, personal digital assistants, set-top devices, PCs, workstations, minicomputers, mainframes, and massively parallel computers. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Leigh S. Montgomery, Esq. ELLZEY KHERKHER SANFORD MONTGOMERY, LLP 4200 Montrose Blvd., Suite 200 Houston, TX 77006 Telephone: (888) 350-3931 Email: lmontgomery@eksm.com - and - Paul J. Doolittle, Esq. POULIN | WILLEY | ANASTOPOULO 32 Ann Street Charleston, SC 29403 Telephone: (803) 222-2222 Facsimile: (843) 494-5536 Email: paul.doolittle@poulinwilley.com cmad@poulinwilley.com ORMS INC: Blind Users Can't Access Website, Youngren Suit Alleges ----------------------------------------------------------------- DUSTIN YOUNGREN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ORMS, INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-15260 (N.D. Ill., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and declaratory relief. According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or visually impaired persons. The Defendant's website, https://thecowlot.com/, contains access barriers which hinder the Plaintiff and Class members to enjoy the benefits of their online goods, content, and services offered to the public through the website. The accessibility issues on the website include but not limited to: inaccurate landmark structure, inadequate focus order, ambiguous link texts, unclear labels for interactive elements, inaccurate alt-text on graphics, the denial of keyboard access for some interactive elements, and the requirement that transactions be performed solely with a mouse. The Plaintiff and Class members seek permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that its website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals. Orms, Inc. is a company that sells online goods and services in Illinois. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Michael Ohrenberger, Esq. EQUAL ACCESS LAW GROUP, PLLC 68-29 Main Street Flushing, NY 11367 Telephone: (844) 731-3343 Facsimile: (716) 281-5496 Email: mohrenberger@ealg.law OSHKOSH CORP: Commack Fire Sues Over Firetruck Sale Monopoly ------------------------------------------------------------ COMMACK FIRE DISTRICT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. OSHKOSH CORPORATION; REV GROUP, INC.; ROSENBAUER AMERICA LLC; and FIRE APPARATUS MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-02013 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 22, 2025) alleges violation of the Sherman Act. According to the complaint, the Defendants engaged in a continuous and multi-faceted exchange of competitively sensitive information through Fire Apparatus Manufacturers' Association, which suppressed supply and price competition and permitted Defendants to monitor each other's adherence to the conspiracy. FAMA collects nonpublic, competitively sensitive information from members and then shares that information with other members in a give-to-get information sharing scheme. The Defendants conspired, colluded, and entered into an agreement to artificially suppress supply and raise prices of Fire Trucks at supracompetitive levels. Defendants' actions resulted in Plaintiff and members of the Class paying supracompetitive prices for Fire Trucks in the United States and its territories. Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets fire and emergency apparatuses, specialty commercial, and military trucks. The Company provides products, such as pumpers, aerial and ladder trucks, tankers, rescue vehicles, snow removal vehicles, refuse truck bodies, and concrete mixers. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brian G. Weber, Esq. JOHNS, FLAHERTY & COLLINS, S.C. Exchange Building 205 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 600 La Crosse, WI 54602 Telephone: (608) 784-5678 Email: brian@johnsflaherty.com - and - Kevin Landau, Esq. Brett Cebulash, Esq. Miles Greaves, Esq. Madeline Hone, Esq. TAUS, CEBULASH & LANDAU, LLP 123 William Street, Suite 1900A New York, NY 10038 Telephone: (212) 931-0704 Email: klandau@tcllaw.com bcebulash@tcllaw.com PERELEL INC: Moran Seeks Equal Website Access for the Blind ----------------------------------------------------------- WASHINGTON MORAN, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PERELEL INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-10217 (S.D.N.Y., December 10, 2025) is a civil rights action against the Defendant for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its interactive website, www.perelelhealth.com, to be fully accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired persons in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York City Human Rights Law, and New York State General Business Law. During Plaintiff's visits to the website, the last occurring on October 23, 2025, in an attempt to purchase a Conception Support Pack from Defendant and to view the information on the website, the Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers that denied him a shopping experience similar to that of a sighted person and full and equal access to the goods and services offered to the public and made available to the public. He was unable to locate pricing and was not able to add the item to the cart due to broken links, pictures without alternate attributes and other barriers on Defendant's website, says the suit. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that its website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers. Perelel Inc. operates the website that offers prenatal health vitamins for stage womanhood.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, NY 10003 Telephone: (212) 228-9795 Facsimile: (212) 982-6284 E-mail: Jeffrey@Gottlieb.legal Dana@Gottlieb.legal Michael@Gottlieb.legal PRESTIGE CAR: Refuses to Honor Gift Cards, Garick Suit Says ----------------------------------------------------------- JOSHUA N. GARICK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PRESTIGE CAR WASH, INC., Defendant, Case No. 25CV3068 (Mass. Super., December 10, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for breach of contract, declaratory judgment, and violation of the Massachusetts General Laws. According to the complaint, the Defendant has engaged in an unlawful scheme whereby it offers gift cards for its products and services to persons and businesses for purchase, but refuses to honor them for some period of time after the card is purchased. Further, Prestige intentionally withholds that information from the customer when they purchase the gift card. The Plaintiff maintains that Defendant's refusal to immediately activate/honor the gift card upon purchase is done knowingly, willingly and in bad faith in order to induce him and other customers who appear at one of Prestige's car wash locations to first purchase a car wash with their own money before, later, being able to use the gift card that they intended to use. As a result of this misleading scheme, the Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant has reaped significant financial benefit and has otherwise caused substantial damage to consumers. Prestige Carwash, Inc. operates a car wash located in North Reading, Massachusetts.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: John R. Yasi, Esq. Paul F.X. Yasi, Jr., Esq. YASI & YASI, P.C. 2 Salem Green, Suite 2 Salem, MA 01970 Telephone: (978) 741-0400 E-mail: john.yasi@yasiandyasi.com pj@yasiandyasi.com PRIMO BRANDS: Misrepresents Water Delivery Services, Hamilton Says ------------------------------------------------------------------ JOSEPH HAMILTON, EDDIE ZHANG, KATHERINE KEMMET, DEVIN HOSKINS, FRANCES DAVIS, PAULA SALOURAS, ROGER LIS, KRISTINE KLEINDIENST, JOSEPH STIPPICK, and DON DEAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. PRIMO BRANDS CORPORATION, BLUETRITON BRANDS, INC., and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 2:25-cv-11874 (C.D. Cal., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for violations of the California False Advertising Law, the California Unfair Competition Law, the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, New York General Business Law, and other states' consumer protection statutes, unjust enrichment, negligence/negligence per se, and conversion. The case arises from the Defendants' misrepresentations of their water delivery services. According to the complaint, the Defendants have marketed their delivery service as a timely, reliable way for consumers to save time and avoid inconvenience, for among other reasons, because large containers of water are bulky and heavy to transport. However, these misrepresentations are false because the Defendants repeatedly missed scheduled deliveries or delayed them for weeks; delivered wrong or incomplete orders; and failed to pick up or replace empty bottles and equipment. The Defendants have also charged consumers for goods or services that they did not deliver to them, or that they did not order, suit says. As a result, the Plaintiffs suffered economic damages. Primo Brands Corporation is a water delivery service provider in California. BlueTriton Brands, Inc. is a water delivery service provider, with its principal place of business in Tampa, Florida. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Robert J. Quigley, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC 1880 Century Park East, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90024 Telephone: (212) 558-5829 Email: rquigley@weitzlux.com PROSPER FUNDING: Prescott Balks at Failure to Protect Personal Info ------------------------------------------------------------------- STEVEN PRESCOTT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PROSPER FUNDING, LLC and PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC., Defendants, Case No. 3:25-cv-10594 (N.D. Cal., December 10, 2025) is a class action brought by the Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated, to address Prosper's inadequate safeguarding of Class Members' private information that they collected and maintained. According to the complaint, to apply for or obtain loans from Prosper, Plaintiff and other customers and applicants are required to entrust Prosper Funding with their highly sensitive and personally identifiable information, which Prosper uses to engage in its usual business activities. Despite these assurances to its customers and applicants, Prosper failed to protect the very customer information it was entrusted, compromising the personal information of millions of its customers and applicants, announced by Defendants on September 17, 2025. As a result of Prosper's inadequate security and breach of its duties and obligations, the private information of Plaintiff and Class Members was compromised through disclosure to an unauthorized criminal third party. In addition, Prosper failed to properly monitor its computer network and systems that housed the private information. Had Prosper properly monitored these electronic and cloud-based systems, it would have discovered the intrusion sooner or prevented it altogether, says the suit. Prosper Funding, LLC is an online, peer-to-peer lending platform that connects borrowers seeking personal loans with individual or institutional investors.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Ryan J. Clarkson, Esq. Yana Hart, Esq. Bryan P. Thompson, Esq. CLARKSON LAW FIRM, P.C. 22525 Pacific Coast Highway Malibu, CA 90265 Telephone: (213) 788-4050 E-mail: rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com yhart@clarksonlawfirm.com bthompson@clarksonlawfirm.com PSKW LLC: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Gamble Suit Alleges -------------------------------------------------------- JONELL GAMBLE, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PSKW, LLC, dba CONNECTIVERX, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-18883 (D.N.J., Dec. 22, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendant unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Gamble was employed by the Defendant as a call center worker. PSKW, LLC doing business as ConnectiveRx, operates as a healthcare software solutions company. The Company offers payment assistance programs, EHR and point of care messaging, digital drug information, pharmaceutical marketing, and patient support services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Nicholas Conlon, Esq. BROWN, LLC 111 Town Square Place, Suite 400 Jersey City, NJ 07310 Telephone: (877) 561-0000 Facsimile: (855) 582-5279 Email: nicholasconlon@jtblawgroup.com RED ROBIN: Faces Collins Suit Over TCPA Violation ------------------------------------------------- DANNY COLLINS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; RED ROBIN WEST, INC., and DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-04120-STV (D. Colo., December 22, 2025) is a class action for damages, injunctive relief, and any other available legal or equitable remedies, resulting from the illegal actions of the Defendant. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants conducted business in the State of Colorado and within this judicial district, including operating the "Red Robin Royalty" marketing text program that sent SMS messages. On November 9, 2024, Defendants contacted Plaintiff on his cellular telephone number (ending in -4189) via SMS messages in an attempt to solicit Plaintiff to purchase or inquire about Defendants' restaurant products and services as part of the 'Red Robin Royalty' promotional program, using short code 57624. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff was physically in Colorado at the time when he received the alleged text messages from Defendants. After receiving subsequent marketing texts, Plaintiff replied "STOP" on multiple occasions. Despite Plaintiff's STOP requests and Defendants' repeated confirmations that Plaintiff had been unsubscribed and that "No more messages will be sent," Defendants continued to send unsolicited telemarketing texts promoting deals and discounts, including but not limited to promotional messages. This violates the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") and related regulations, says the suit. Plaintiff DANNY COLLINS is a resident of the State of Colorado. Defendant RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. is a Restaurants, and Hospitality company located in Greenwood Village, Colorado. Defendant RED ROBIN WEST, INC. specializes in eating places.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Todd M .Friedman, Esq. 23586 Calabasas Rd., Suite 105 Calabasas, CA 91302 Telephone: 323-306-4234 E-mail: tfriedman@toddflaw.com RICHLAND MANAGEMENT: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Nicolas Alleges --------------------------------------------------------------- GERALD NICOLAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. RICHLAND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.; 141 GREAT NECK ROAD CORP.; PATRICIA ABRAMS; and CHRISTIAN ANTIGUA, Defendants, Case No. 2:25-cv-06969 (E.D.N.Y., Dec. 18, 2025) alleges Defendants' violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Nicolas was employed by the Defendants as a doorman. Richland Management Company, Inc. family-owned and operated firm specializing in managing small to mid-sized Co-ops and Condos. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Emanuel Kataev, Esq. SAGE LEGAL LLC 18211 Jamaica Avenue Jamaica, NY 11423-2327 Telephone: (718) 412-2421 Facsimile: (718) 489-4155 Email: emanuel@sagelegal.nyc RITZ LLC: Mattera Sues Over Disabled's Equal Access to Property --------------------------------------------------------------- GENE MATTERA and ACCESS 4 ALL, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. THE RITZ, LLC and INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS CORPORATION, Defendants, Case No. 3:25-cv-10729 (N.D. Cal., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 28 C.F.R. Section 36.302(e)(1), and the Unruh Act. According to the complaint, the Defendants have failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate their facilities to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiffs and other persons with disabilities. The Defendants have continued to discriminate against people who are disabled in ways that block them from access and use of their property and business. The Plaintiffs and similarly situated disabled individuals encountered architectural barriers in common areas such parking and exterior routes, access to Goods and Services, and restrooms. The Plaintiffs and Class members seek injunctive relief to remove the existing architectural barriers to the physically disabled when such removal is readily achievable for the place of public accommodation. Access 4 All, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation, with its principal office in Miami-Dade County, Florida. The Ritz, LLC is a commercial property owner and operator based in California. Intercontinental Hotels Corporation is a commercial property owner and operator based in California. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Jacob A. Gillick, Esq. GILLICK LEGAL, APC 3990 Old Town Ave., Ste. A200 San Diego, CA 92110 Telephone: (858) 250-0656 Email: jgillick@gillicklegal.com - and - John A. Salcedo, Esq. THE MINEO SALCEDO LAW FIRM, PA 5600 Davie Road Davie, FL 33314 Telephone: (954) 463-8100 Facsimile: (954) 463-8100 Email: Service@mineolaw.com RIVERFRONT STAMPING: Guzman Sues Over Discrimination & Harassment ----------------------------------------------------------------- DONOVAN GUZMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. RIVERFRONT STAMPING, LLC d/b/a/ RIVERFRONT MACHINE, Defendant, Case No. 4:25-cv-04226-SLD-RLH (C.D. Ill., December 17, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for race discrimination, race harassment, and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Plaintiff worked for the Defendant as a machine operator from in or about August 2022 until his unlawful termination on or about August 15, 2025. Riverfront Stamping, LLC, doing business as Riverfront Machine, is a specialized metal fabrication manufacturer in Spring Valley, Illinois. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Nathan C. Volheim, ESQ. SULAIMAN LAW GROUP LTD. 2500 S. Highland Avenue, Suite 200 Lombard, IL 60148 Telephone: (630) 568-3056 Facsimile: (630) 575-8188 Email: nvolheim@sulaimanlaw.com - and - Sophia Steere, Esq. SULAIMAN LAW GROUP LTD. 2500 S. Highland Avenue, Suite 200 Lombard, IL 60148 Telephone: (331) 307-7634 Facsimile: (630) 575-8188 Email: ssteere@sulaimanlaw.com ROBERT BOSCH: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Johnson Alleges ----------------------------------------------------------- MALIAKA JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ROBERT BOSCH LLC d/b/a BOSCH USA, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-14083-TGB-KGA (E.D. Mich., Dec. 18, 2025) alleges that the Defendant failed to secure and safeguard personally identifiable information and personal protected health information of the Plaintiff and the Class. According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, the Defendant failed to implement practices and systems to mitigate against the risks posed by the Defendant's negligent IT practices. As a result of these failures, the Plaintiff and Class members face a litany of harms that accompany data breaches of this magnitude and severity. Robert Bosch LLC provides automotive, industrial technology, and consumer goods. The Company produces auto parts, commercial vehicle equipment, home appliances, power tools, packaging technology, production tools, and security systems. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Lisa M. Esser, Esq. SOMMERS SCHWARTZ P.C. One Towne Square, 17th Floor Southfield, MI 48076 Telephone: (248) 746-4015 Email: LEsser@sommerspc.com - and - Israel David, Esq. Adam M. Harris, Esq. ISRAEL DAVID LLC 60 Broad Street, Suite 2900 New York, NY 10004 Telephone: (212) 350-8850 Email: israel.david@davidllc.com adam.harris@davidllc.com - and - Mark A. Cianci, Esq. ISRAEL DAVID LLC 399 Boylston Street, Floor 6, Suite 23 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 295-7771 Email: mark.cianci@davidllc.com SAN FRANCISCO, CA: Litvinova Appeals Summary Judgment to 9th Cir. ----------------------------------------------------------------- TATYANA LITVINOVA, et al. are taking an appeal from a court order granting the Defendant's motion for summary judgment in the lawsuit entitled Tatyana Litvinova, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant, Case No. 3:18-cv-01494-RS, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Plaintiffs sued the City and County of San Francisco for failure to pay overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act. On Oct. 16, 2025, the Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, which Judge Richard Seeborg granted on Nov. 17, 2025. The Defendant's motion to exclude testimony and motion for decertification are found as moot. The appellate case is captioned Litvinova, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, Case No. 25-7911, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed on December 17, 2025. The briefing schedule in the Appellate Case states that: -- Appellant's Mediation Questionnaire was due on December 22, 2025; -- Appellant's Opening Brief is due on January 26, 2026; and -- Appellee's Answering Brief is due on February 25, 2026. [BN] Plaintiff-Appellant TATYANA LITVINOVA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, is represented by: Eduardo Gregory Roy, Esq. PROMETHEUS PARTNERS, LLP 1950 Broadway, Suite 3011 Oakland, CA 94612 Defendant-Appellee CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO is represented by: Linda Margaret Ross, Esq. RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP 350 Sansome Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94104 SMARTSHEET INC: KaraEftimoglu Balks at Misleading Proxy Statements ------------------------------------------------------------------ EVYENIA KARAEFTIMOGLU, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MARK P. MADER and SMARTSHEET INC. Defendants, Case No. 2:25-cv-02530 (W.D. Wash., December 10, 2025) is a stockholder class action brought by Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated former stockholders of Smartsheet Inc., arising from the Defendants' violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The suit alleges that Smartsheet and Mark P. Mader, the Company's former President, Chief Executive Officer, and member of the Smartsheet Board of Directors, violated federal law in connection with their efforts to effectuate the January 2025 sale (the "Merger" or "Buyout") of Smartsheet to affiliates of investment funds managed by affiliates of Blackstone Inc., investment funds managed by Vista Equity Partners Management, LLC, and Platinum Falcon B 2018 RSC Limited, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, which participated as an indirect minority investor in Smartsheet. In connection with the Company's solicitation of stockholder approval of the Buyout, the Defendants issued and filed with the SEC a false and misleading Schedule 14A Proxy statement, as amended, asserts the complaint. As a result of the materially misleading Proxy, Smartsheet's shareholders approved the Buyout. The $56.50 per share Merger Consideration fell in the middle of Qatalyst's discounted cash flow analysis of $47.80 to $65.31 per share based on admittedly "conservative" forecasts. The Merger Consideration also fell below several analyst price targets, which had been raised following the Company's early 2024 successes, says the suit. Smartsheet is an enterprise software company providing software-as-a-service work management solutions to small and large clients.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Roger M. Townsend, Esq. TOWNSEND LEGAL, PLLC 380 Winslow Way, Suite 200 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Telephone: (206) 761-2480 E-mail: roger@townsendlegal.com - and - Michael J. Palestina, Esq. Brian Mears, Esq. Gina Palermo, Esq. KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC 1100 Poydras Street, Suite 960 New Orleans, LA 70163 Telephone: (504) 455-1400 E-mail: michael.palestina@ksfcounsel.com brian.mears@ksfcounsel.com gina.palermo@ksfcounsel.com SOUTHWEST AIRLINES: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Ibrahim Alleges -------------------------------------------------------------- AMR IBRAHIM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 25CV161219 (Cal. Sup., Alameda Cty., Dec. 22, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Ibrahim was employed by the Defendants as a mechanic. Southwest Airlines Co. is a domestic airline that provides primarily short-haul, high-frequency, and point-to-point services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Matthew R. Bainer, Esq. THE BAINER LAW FIRM 1999 Harrison St., Suite 1800 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 922-1802 Email: mbainer@binerlawfirm.com SYNGENTA CROP: Summerford Sues Over Wrongful Sale of Herbicide -------------------------------------------------------------- Donald Summerford, and other similarly situated victims v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., Case No. N25C-12-439 PQT (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 19, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Paraquat which is defective and is dangerous to human health. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Paraquat, which causes Parkinson's disease in humans. The Plaintiff maintains that Defendants' Paraquat products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. the Plaintiff's injuries, like those striking thousands of similarly situated victims across the country, were avoidable, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Parkinson's disease, Parkinsonism, Parkinson's precursor ailments, and/or symptoms consistent with Parkinson's disease as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Paraquat. The Defendants advertise and sell goods in the State of Delaware and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com SYNGENTA CROP: Sumner Sues Over Negligent Distribution and Sale --------------------------------------------------------------- Denzil Sumner, and other similarly situated victims v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., Case No. N25C-12-453 PQT (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 19, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Paraquat which is defective and is dangerous to human health. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Paraquat, which causes Parkinson's disease in humans. The Plaintiff maintains that Defendants' Paraquat products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. the Plaintiff's injuries, like those striking thousands of similarly situated victims across the country, were avoidable, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Parkinson's disease, Parkinsonism, Parkinson's precursor ailments, and/or symptoms consistent with Parkinson's disease as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Paraquat. The Defendants advertise and sell goods in the State of Delaware and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com SYNGENTA CROP: Taylor Sues Over Wrongful Advertising and Sale ------------------------------------------------------------- Eugene Taylor, and other similarly situated victims v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., Case No. N25C-12-456 PQT (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 19, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Paraquat which is defective and is dangerous to human health. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Paraquat, which causes Parkinson's disease in humans. The Plaintiff maintains that Defendants' Paraquat products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. the Plaintiff's injuries, like those striking thousands of similarly situated victims across the country, were avoidable, says the complaint. The Plaintiff developed Parkinson's disease, Parkinsonism, Parkinson's precursor ailments, and/or symptoms consistent with Parkinson's disease as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Paraquat. The Defendants advertise and sell goods in the State of Delaware and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com SYNGENTA CROP: White Sues Over Wrongful Advertising and Sale ------------------------------------------------------------ Sterling White, on behalf of the Estate of Linda White Tusinski, and other similarly situated victims v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., Case No. N25C-12-466 PQT (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 19, 2025), is brought for personal injuries sustained by exposure to Paraquat which is defective and is dangerous to human health. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of the herbicide Paraquat, which causes Parkinson's disease in humans. The Plaintiff maintains that Defendants' Paraquat products are defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be marketed and sold in commerce and lacked proper warnings and directions as to the dangers associated with its use. the Plaintiff's injuries, like those striking thousands of similarly situated victims across the country, were avoidable, says the complaint. The Plaintiff Sterling White is a natural person and is the Representative of Linda White Tusinski, deceased, who developed Parkinson's disease, Parkinsonism, Parkinson's precursor ailments, and/or symptoms consistent with Parkinson's disease as a direct and proximate result of being exposed to Paraquat. The Defendants advertise and sell goods in the State of Delaware and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Raeann Warner, Esq. COLLINS PRICE WARNER & WOLOSHIN 8 East 13th Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: (302) 655-4600 Email: raeann@cpwwlaw.com - and - Emily T. Acosta, Esq. Madison Donaldson, Esq. WAGSTAFF LAW FIRM 940 North Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Tel: (303) 376-6360 Fax: (888) 875-2889 Email: eacosta@wagstafflawfirm.com mdonaldson@wagstafflawfirm.com TASTE SALUD INC: Varela Files Suit in C.D. California ----------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Taste Salud, Inc. The case is styled as Diane Varela, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Taste Salud, Inc., Case No. 8:25-cv-02822 (C.D. Cal., Dec. 22, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. Taste Salud -- https://tastesalud.com/ -- is an online store for hydration and immunity drinks.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Adrian Gucovschi, Esq. GUCOVSCHI LAW FIRM, PLLC 140 Broadway, Ste. FL. 46 New York, NY 10005 Phone: (929) 996-3053 Email: adrian@gucovschilaw.com TESLA INC: Appeals Class Cert. Order in Losavio Suit to 9th Circuit ------------------------------------------------------------------- TESLA INC., et al. are taking an appeal from a court order granting the Plaintiff's motion to certify class in the lawsuit entitled Thomas J. Losavio, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Tesla Inc., et al., Defendants, Case No. 3:22-cv-05240-RFL, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, brings claims against the Defendants for alleged violations of California's Unfair Competition Law, Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and False Advertising Law, and for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and negligence by making misleading statements about the full self-driving capability of Tesla's vehicles. The Plaintiff filed a motion for class certification on May 6, 2025. On Sept. 3, 2025, Judge Rita F. Lin entered an Order granting the Plaintiff's motion to certify class. The Court appoints Plaintiff Thomas Losavio as the representative of the certified classes. The Court appoints Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP, Casey Gerry Francavilla Blatt LLP, and Bottini & Bottini, Inc. as class counsel. The appellate case is captioned Losavio v. Tesla Inc., et al., Case No. 25-7927, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed on December 18, 2025. The briefing schedule in the Appellate Case states that: -- Appellant's Mediation Questionnaire was due on December 23, 2025; -- Appellant's Appeal Transcript Order is due on January 2, 2026; -- Appellant's Appeal Transcript is due on February 2, 2026; -- Appellant's Opening Brief is due on March 12, 2026; and -- Appellee's Answering Brief is due on April 13, 2026. [BN] Plaintiff-Appellee THOMAS J. LOSAVIO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, is represented by: Frank Mario Pitre, Esq. Julie L. Fieber, Esq. COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 - and - Thomas Loeser, Esq. COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP 1809 7th Avenue, Suite 1610 Seattle, WA 98101 - and - Francis A. Bottini, Jr., Esq. BOTTINI & BOTTINI, INC. 7817 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 102 La Jolla, CA 92037 - and - David S. Casey, II, Esq. Gayle M. Blatt, Esq. CASEY, GERRY, SCHENK, FRANCAVILLA, BLATT & PENFIELD, LLP 110 Laurel Street San Diego, CA 92101 Defendants-Appellants TESLA INC., et al. are represented by: Alan E. Schoenfeld, Esq. WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR, LLP 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 - and - David Charles Marcus, Esq. Christopher Thomas Casamassima, Esq. WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR, LLP 350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90071 TRANSCOM WORLDWIDE: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Bailey Alleges ------------------------------------------------------------- QIANA BAILEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. TRANSCOM WORLDWIDE USA LLC, Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-04101-TPO (D. Colo., Dec. 22, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendant unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Bailey was employed by the Defendant as a customer service representative. Transcom Worldwide USA LLC provides technology consulting services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kevin J. Stoops, Esq. Ethan C. Goemann, Esq. SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. One Towne Square 17th Floor Southfield, MI 48076 Telephone: (248) 355-0300 Email: kstoops@sommerspc.com egoemann@sommerspc.com TRANSUNION LLC: Tapia Suit Transferred to N.D. Illinois ------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Elbert Gordon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ASCENSION HEALTH, Case No. 3:25-cv-01575 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on Dec. 23, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:25-cv-15390 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract. TransUnion LLC -- https://www.transunion.com/ -- is an American consumer credit reporting agency.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Bryan Frederick Aylstock, Esq. AYLSTOCK WITKIN KREIS & OVERHOLTZ PLLC 803 N Palafox Street Pensacola, FL 32501 Phone: (850) 916-7450 Email: baylstock@awkolaw.com The Defendant is represented by: Martha Rosa Mora, Esq. AVILA, RODRIGUEZ, HERNANDEZ, MENA & FERRI, LLP 2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Suite 1225 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Phone: (305) 779-3567 TRIAGE PARTNERS: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Lauray Alleges ---------------------------------------------------------- CHRISTOPHER LAURAY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. TRIAGE PARTNERS, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 8:25-cv-03466 (M.D. Fla., Dec. 18, 2025) seeks to recover from the Defendant unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff Lauray was employed by the Defendant as a cable technician. Triage Partners, LLC provides information technology services. The Company offers planning, engineering, designing, installation, life cycle management, and other services. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Jason L. Gunter, Esq. Conor P. Foley, Esq. Peter M. Jennings, Esq. GUNTERFIRM 2165 W. First St., #104 Fort Myers, FL 33901 Telephone: (239) 334-7017 Email: Jason@GunterFirm.com Conor@GunterFirm.com Peter@GunterFirm.com - and - Harold L. Lichten, Esq. Olena Savytska, Esq. LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 729 Boylston St., Suite 2000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 994-5800 Email: hlichten@llrlaw.com osavytska@llrlaw.com UNITED AIRLINES: Faces Hogan Suit Over Wrongful Termination ----------------------------------------------------------- FORACE R. HOGAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and DOES 1-50, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-11901 (C.D. Cal., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for wrongful termination in violation of California's Public Policy. According to the complaint, the Defendant discriminated against the Plaintiff and other pilots nationwide who did not obtain the Covid-19 Shot, but had their Reasonable Accommodation Request approved, and /or took other adverse employment actions against them. The Defendants' actions also negligently if not intentionally inflicted upon the Plaintiff severe emotional and physical distress. The Defendants' actions deprived the Plaintiff of his employment, and his ability to seek and obtain commensurate employment with other airlines, thereby depriving the Plaintiff of continuing or increasing his annual income and job security, suit says. United Airlines, Inc. is an airline company, with its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Leslie Schwaebe Akins, Esq. LESLIE SCHWAEBE AKINS, A Law Corporation 7157 Argonauta Way Carlsbad, CA 92009 Telephone: (760) 931-2920 Facsimile: (760) 603-0547 Email: lsa@stockmarketlaw.com VENEZUELA: Appeals Adopted Master's Recommendation to 3rd Circuit ----------------------------------------------------------------- BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA is taking an appeal from a court order approving the Special Master's Updated Final Recommendation in the lawsuit entitled Valores Mundiales SL, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Defendant, Case No. 1:23-mc-00298, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On Dec. 9, 2025, Judge Leonard P. Stark entered an Order adopting the Special Master's Updated Final Recommendation to approve Amber Energy Bid. The Venezuela Parties' objections to the Amber Recommendation are overruled, except with respect to two provisions of the proposed sale order. Gold Reserve's objections to the Amber Recommendation, joined by Siemens Energy, Inc. and Valores Mundiales, SL and Consorcio Andino, SL are overruled. The Venezuela Parties' Motion to Stay Pending Appeal is denied. The Supplemental Motion for Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) Approval and Recusal of Judge Stark, filed by Dr. Leroy A. Garrett, is denied. The appellate case is captioned Valores Mundiales SL, et al. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Case No. 25-3490, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, filed on December 18, 2025. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellees VALORES MUNDIALES SL, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, are represented by: Andrew S. Dupre, Esq. Brian R. Lemon, Esq. AKERMAN 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1710 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 596-9200 Defendant-Appellant BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA is represented by: A. Thompson Bayliss, Esq. Christopher F. Cannataro, Esq. ABRAMS & BAYLISS 20 Montchanin Road, Suite 200 Wilmington, DE 19807 Telephone: (302) 778-1033 (302) 778-1155 - and - Samuel T. Hirzel, II, Esq. Brendan P. McDonnell, Esq. Gillian L. Andrews, Esq. HEYMAN ENERIO GATTUSO & HIRZEL 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 472-7315 (302) 472-7308 (302) 472-7300 VENEZUELA: Appeals Final Recommendation Order in Gold Reserve Suit ------------------------------------------------------------------ BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA is taking an appeal from a court order approving the Special Master's Updated Final Recommendation in the lawsuit entitled Gold Reserve Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Defendant, Case No. 1:22-mc-00453, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On Dec. 9, 2025, Judge Leonard P. Stark entered an Order adopting the Special Master's Updated Final Recommendation to approve Amber Energy Bid. The Venezuela Parties' objections to the Amber Recommendation are overruled, except with respect to two provisions of the proposed sale order. Gold Reserve's objections to the Amber Recommendation, joined by Siemens Energy, Inc. and Valores Mundiales, SL and Consorcio Andino, SL are overruled. The Venezuela Parties' Motion to Stay Pending Appeal is denied. The Supplemental Motion for Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) Approval and Recusal of Judge Stark, filed by Dr. Leroy A. Garrett, is denied. The appellate case is captioned Gold Reserve Inc. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Case No. 25-3488, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, filed on December 18, 2025. [BN] Plaintiff-Appellee GOLD RESERVE INC., et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, is represented by: Matthew H. Kirtland, Esq. NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT 799 9th Street NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 662-4659 - and - Kevin J. Mangan, Esq. Stephanie S. Riley, Esq. Matthew P. Ward, Esq. WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) 1313 N. Market Street, Suite 1200 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 252-4361 (302) 559-8528 (302) 252-4320 Defendant-Appellant BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA is represented by: Ginger D. Anders, Esq. Elaine J. Goldenberg, Esq. Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Esq. MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON 601 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Suite 500e Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 220-1107 (202) 220-1114 (202) 220-1101 - and - George M. Garvey, Esq. Adeel Mohammadi, Esq. MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON 350 S. Grand Avenue, 50th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 683-9153 (213) 683-9543 - and - Samuel T. Hirzel, II, Esq. Brendan P. McDonnell, Esq. HEYMAN ENERIO GATTUSO & HIRZEL 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 472-7315 (302) 472-7308 VENEZUELA: Appeals Special Master's Final Recommendation Order -------------------------------------------------------------- BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA is taking an appeal from a court order approving the Special Master's Updated Final Recommendation in the lawsuit entitled Conocophillips Petrozuata BV, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Defendant, Case No. 1:22-mc-00464, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On Dec. 9, 2025, Judge Leonard P. Stark entered an Order adopting the Special Master's Updated Final Recommendation to approve Amber Energy Bid. The Venezuela Parties' objections to the Amber Recommendation are overruled, except with respect to two provisions of the proposed sale order. Gold Reserve's objections to the Amber Recommendation, joined by Siemens Energy, Inc. and Valores Mundiales, SL and Consorcio Andino, SL are overruled. The Venezuela Parties' Motion to Stay Pending Appeal is denied. The Supplemental Motion for Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) Approval and Recusal of Judge Stark, filed by Dr. Leroy A. Garrett, is denied. The appellate case is captioned Conocophillips Petrozuata BV, et al. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Case No. 25-3489, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, filed on December 18, 2025. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellees CONOCOPHILLIPS PETROZUATA BV, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, are represented by: Garrett B. Moritz, Esq. ROSS ARONSTAM & MORITZ 1313 N. Market Street, Suite 1001 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 576-1604 Defendant-Appellant BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA is represented by: A. Thompson Bayliss, Esq. Christopher F. Cannataro, Esq. ABRAMS & BAYLISS 20 Montchanin Road, Suite 200 Wilmington, DE 19807 Telephone: (302) 778-1033 (302) 778-1155 - and - Samuel T. Hirzel, II, Esq. Brendan P. McDonnell, Esq. HEYMAN ENERIO GATTUSO & HIRZEL 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 472-7315 (302) 472-7308 VIP SECURITY: Goilo Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime for Security Agents ------------------------------------------------------------------ GUILLERMO GOILO, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff v. VIP SECURITY FLORIDA, LLC, LUIS BELFORT, and DANIEL VAINBERG, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-25933 (S.D. Fla., December 17, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Plaintiff worked for the Defendants as a security agent from 2017 through October 15, 2025. VIP Security Florida, LLC is a private security services company with its headquarters in Doral, Florida. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Suhaill M. Morales, Esq. SMM LAW PA 7900 NW 155 St., Suite 203 Miami Lakes, FL 33016 Telephone: (305) 518-7026 Email: Smorales@smmlawfirm.com WALMART INC: Faces Rowe Suit Over Warehouse Associates' Unpaid OT ----------------------------------------------------------------- RYAN ROWE, on behalf of himself and other individuals similarly situated, known and unknown, Plaintiff v. WALMART INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:25-cv-15076 (N.D. Ill., December 11, 2025) is a class action lawsuit against Walmart seeking all available relief under the Illinois Minimum Wage Law and the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act for Defendant's failure to pay overtime and other earned compensation for Plaintiff's time spent working at Defendant's premises. The complaint alleges that the Defendant knowingly failed to compensate Plaintiff and the Class Members for all hours worked, and hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a work week. Plaintiff Rowe worked for Walmart as an hourly, non-exempt Warehouse Associate at the Walmart distribution center located in Elwood, Illinois from approximately June 2022 through April 2024. Walmart Inc. is a multinational retail corporation that provides its customers with opportunities to shop for merchandise in Walmart's retail stores and order merchandise for delivery to their homes and businesses through Walmart's web and mobile applications.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Douglas M. Werman, Esq. Maureen A. Salas, Esq. Anne Kramer, Esq. WERMAN SALAS P.C. 77 W. Washington St., Ste 1402 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: (312) 419-1008 E-mail: dwerman@flsalaw.com msalas@flsalaw.com akramer@flsalaw.com WELLS FARGO: Liable to Stolen Investor Money, Joseph Suit Claims ---------------------------------------------------------------- REGINALD JOSEPH, GARDY VASTEY, and MICHELIN and ROSE SEJOUR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Defendant, Case No. 0:25-cv-62606-RS (S.D. Fla., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting fraud, aiding and abetting conversion, and quasi contract/unjust enrichment. The case arises from Wells Fargo's facilitation of a Ponzi scheme by knowingly aiding and abetting the flow and misappropriation of stolen investor money through its accounts. According to the complaint, the Ponzi scheme began in as early as August of 2019 when Sanjay Singh, a now-convicted felon, began offering investments through his investment entity called "Royal Bengal Logistics" (RBL). RBL misappropriated nearly $20 million of investors' contributions into Sanjay Singh's brokerage accounts, which focused on highly speculative equities trading on margin. As a result of Wells Fargo's misconduct, the Plaintiffs and the Class lost their investment capital and suffered damages in an amount to be proven at trial. Wells Fargo Bank, NA is a federally chartered National Banking Association, based in San Francisco, California. [BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Ryan A. Schwamm, Esq. Scott L. Silver, Esq. Peter M. Spett, Esq. SILVER LAW GROUP 11780 W. Sample Road Coral Springs, FL 33065 Telephone: (954) 755-4799 Email: ssilver@silverlaw.com rschwamm@silverlaw.com pspett@silverlaw.com - and - Hassan A. Zavareei, Esq. Katherine M. Aizupuru, Esq. TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Ave NW Suite 1010 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 973-0900 Email: hzavareei@tzlegal.com kaizpuru@tzlegal.com WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY: Harrington Sues Over Work Discrimination ---------------------------------------------------------------- TYRIQ HARRINGTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY, WESTCHESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HECTOR LOPEZ, SEAN MATTHEWS, FRANCESCO IMBROGNO and JOSEPH SPANO, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants, Case No. 1:25-cv-10407 (S.D.N.Y., December 16, 2025) is a class action against the Defendants for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the New York State Human Rights Law. According to the complaint, the Defendants engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice by improperly forcing the Plaintiff to use his personal time to cover injury leave, writing him up and issuing him discipline on the basis of his disability, suspending him without pay on the basis of his disability and harassing him with phone calls and house visits. The Plaintiff's similarly situated non-disabled co-workers were not subjected to any of the above actions by the Defendants, suit says. As a result of the Defendants' actions, the Plaintiff has suffered lost pay, emotional damages and has incurred legal fees in an attempt to stop the harassment and retaliation. Westchester County is a municipal corporation, with its principal place of business located in White Plains, New York. Westchester County Department of Corrections is a municipal corporation, with its principal place of business located in White Plains, New York. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Paul Bartels, Esq. BELL LAW GROUP PLLC 116 Jackson Avenue Syosset, NY 11791 Email: Paul@belllg.com WHEELER REIT: $7.1MM Class Settlement to be Heard on March 31 ------------------------------------------------------------- Rolnick Kramer Sadighi LLP issued a statement regarding notice of a proposed class action settlement: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION SUMMARY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION To: ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES WHO (1) HELD WHEELER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. ("WHEELER") COMMON STOCK AS OF AUGUST 16, 2021; OR (2) PURCHASED WHEELER COMMON STOCK BETWEEN AUGUST 16, 2021 AND SEPTEMBER 20, 2023, INCLUSIVE, AND ARE NOT OTHERWISE EXCLUDED FROM THE CLASS (THE "CLASS" OR "CLASS MEMBERS") THIS NOTICE WAS AUTHORIZED BY THE COURT. IT IS NOT A LAWYER SOLICITATION. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a hearing will be held on March 31, 2026, at 10:30 a.m., before the Honorable Mark S. Davis at the United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, in Courtroom 1 of the Walter E. Hoffman Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, VA 23510, to determine whether: (1) the proposed settlement (the "Settlement") in the action known as Khoshaba v. Stilwell, et al., Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-237 (the "Class Action"), as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement ("Stipulation") for $7,125,000 in cash should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (2) the Judgment as provided under the Stipulation should be entered dismissing the Class Action with prejudice; (3) to award Plaintiff's Counsel attorneys' fees and expenses out of the Settlement Fund (as defined in the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action ("Notice"), which is discussed below) and to award Plaintiff an incentive fee in connection with his representation of the Class, and, if so, in what amounts; and (4) the Plan of Allocation should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Court may decide to conduct the Settlement Hearing by video or telephonic conference, or otherwise allow Class Members to appear remotely at the hearing, without further written notice to the Class. In order to determine whether the date and time of the Settlement Hearing have changed, or whether Class Members must or may participate by phone or video, it is important that you monitor the Court's docket and the Settlement website, www.WheelerREITSettlement.com, before making any plans to attend the Settlement Hearing. Updates regarding the Settlement Hearing, including any changes to the date or time of the hearing or updates regarding in-person or remote appearances at the hearing, will be posted to the Settlement website, www.WheelerREITSettlement.com. Also, if the Court requires or allows Class Members to participate in the Settlement Hearing by remote means, the information for accessing the hearing will be posted to the Settlement website. IF YOU HELD WHEELER COMMON STOCK AS OF AUGUST 16, 2021 OR PURCHASED WHEELER COMMON STOCK BETWEEN AUGUST 16, 2021 AND SEPTEMBER 20, 2023, INCLUSIVE, YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE SETTLEMENT OF THE CLASS ACTION. To share in the distribution of the Settlement Fund, you must establish your rights by submitting a Proof of Claim and Release form ("Proof of Claim") by mail (postmarked no later than March 24, 2026) or electronically (no later than March 24, 2026). Your failure to submit your Proof of Claim by March 24, 2026, will subject your claim to rejection and preclude your receiving any of the recovery in connection with the Settlement of the Class Action. If you are a member of the Class, and do not request exclusion from the Class, you will be bound by the Settlement and any judgment and release entered in the Class Action, including, but not limited to, the Judgment, whether or not you submit a Proof of Claim. If you have not received a copy of the Notice, which more completely describes the Settlement and your rights thereunder (including your right to object to the Settlement), and a Proof of Claim, you may obtain these documents, as well as a copy of the Stipulation (which, among other things, contains definitions for the defined terms used in this Summary Notice) and other Settlement documents, online at www.WheelerREITSettlement.com, or by writing to: Wheeler REIT Settlement c/o Verita Global, LLC P.O. Box 301170 Los Angeles, CA 90030-1170 Inquiries should NOT be directed to Defendants, the Court, or the Clerk of the Court. Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice or a Proof of Claim, may be made to Plaintiff's Counsel: ROLNICK KRAMER SADIGHI LLP PENN 1, Suite 3401 One Pennsylvania Plaza New York, NY 10119 Telephone: (212) 597-2800 IF YOU DESIRE TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE CLASS, YOU MUST SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION SUCH THAT IT IS POSTMARKED BY MARCH 10, 2026, IN THE MANNER AND FORM EXPLAINED IN THE NOTICE. ALL CLASS MEMBERS WILL BE BOUND BY THE SETTLEMENT EVEN IF THEY DO NOT SUBMIT A TIMELY PROOF OF CLAIM. IF YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE PLAN OF ALLOCATION, THE REQUEST BY PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES NOT TO EXCEED 28% OF THE $7,125,000 SETTLEMENT AMOUNT AND EXPENSES NOT TO EXCEED $665,000, AND AN INCENTIVE AWARD TO PLAINTIFF NOT TO EXCEED $50,000 IN THE AGGREGATE IN CONNECTION WITH HIS REPRESENTATION OF THE CLASS. ANY OBJECTIONS MUST BE FILED WITH THE COURT AND SENT TO LEAD COUNSEL AND DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL BY MARCH 10, 2026, IN THE MANNER AND FORM EXPLAINED IN THE NOTICE. DATED: December 31, 2025 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA The Stipulation can be viewed and/or obtained at www.WheelerREITSettlement.com WISDOM NATURAL: Boyd Sues Over Mislabeled Organic Sweetener ----------------------------------------------------------- JOHN BOYD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. WISDOM NATURAL BRANDS, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-12080 (C.D. Cal., Dec. 22, 2025) alleges violation of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law, and False Advertising Law. According to the complaint, the Defendant makes, distributes, sells, and markets Sweet Leaf Monk Fruit Organic Sweetener (the "Product"). The Defendant misleadingly labels the Product as a "monk fruit" sweetener, "sweetened by nature," that contains "nothing artificial," when in fact the Product contains less than 1% monk fruit extract and is primarily sweetened with the artificial sweetener erythritol. Despite being labeled as a "monk fruit" sweetener, the Product's rear label ingredient list reveals that erythritol is the most prominent ingredient in the Product, says the suit. Wisdom Natural Brands manufactures health care products. The Company provides sweetleaf sweetener and flavored liquid stevia products. The Plaintiff is represented by: Lilach H. Klein, Esq. Michael T. Houchin, Esq. Zachary M. Crosner, Esq. CROSNER LEGAL, P.C. 9440 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 301 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Telephone: (866) 276-7637 Facsimile: (310) 510-6429 Email: lilach@crosnerlegal.com mhouchin@crosnerlegal.com zach@crosnerlegal.com XPDI SPONSOR: $14.75MM Class Settlement to be Heard on March 17 --------------------------------------------------------------- IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE C.A. No. 2023-0759-LWW BRAD IHLE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. THEODORE J. BROMBACH, PATRICK C. EILERS, JAMES P. NYGAARD, JR., and XPDI SPONSOR LLC, Defendants. SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR TO: ALL MEMBERS OF THE CLASS, DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: "CLASS" MEANS A NON-OPT-OUT CLASS FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES ONLY, AND PURSUANT TO COURT OF CHANCERY RULES 23(A), 23(B)(1), AND 23(B)(2), CONSISTING OF ALL RECORD AND BENEFICIAL HOLDERS OF POWER & DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE ACQUISITION CORP. ("XPDI" OR THE "COMPANY") CLASS A COMMON STOCK WHO HELD SUCH STOCK BETWEEN THE CLOSE OF THE MARKET ON JANUARY 14, 2022, AT 5:00 P.M. EST (THE "REDEMPTION DEADLINE") THROUGH THE CLOSE OF THE TRANSACTION ON JANUARY 20, 2022 (THE "CLASS PERIOD"), TOGETHER WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS-IN-INTEREST WHO OBTAINED SHARES BY OPERATION OF LAW, BUT EXCLUDING THE EXCLUDED PERSONS. THIS NOTICE WAS AUTHORIZED BY THE COURT. IT IS NOT A LAWYER SOLICITATION. PLEASE READ THIS SUMMARY NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the "Court"), that the stockholder class action (the "Action") is pending in the Court. YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that Plaintiff Brad Ihle ("Plaintiff"), individually and on behalf of the Class, and Defendants Theodore J. Brombach, Patrick C. Eilers, James P. Nygaard, Jr., and XPDI Sponsor LLC (collectively, the "Defendants") have reached a proposed settlement of the Action for $14,750,000 in cash as set forth in the Stipulation (the "Settlement"), a copy of which is available at www.XPDIClassAction.com. If approved by the Court, the Settlement will resolve all claims asserted in the Action against the Defendants. A hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") will be held on March 17, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., before The Honorable Lori W. Will, Vice Chancellor, either in person at the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, Leonard L. Williams Justice Center, 500 North King Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, or remotely by telephone or videoconference (in the discretion of the Court), to, among other things: (i) determine whether certification of the Class for settlement purposes should be made final; (ii) determine whether the Settlement should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of the Class; (iii) determine whether the Action should be dismissed with prejudice and the Releases provided under the Stipulation should be granted; (iv) determine whether the Order and Final Judgment approving the Settlement should be entered; (v) determine whether the proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund is fair and reasonable, and should therefore be approved; (vi) determine whether and in what amount any Fee and Expense Award should be paid to Plaintiff's Counsel out of the Settlement Fund and whether and in what amount any service award to Plaintiff should be paid out of the Fee and Expense Award; (vii) hear and rule on any objections to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Plaintiff's Counsel's application for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses; and (viii) consider such other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in connection with the Settlement. Any updates regarding the Settlement Hearing, including any changes to the date or time of the hearing or updates regarding in-person or remote appearances, will be posted to the Settlement Website, www.XPDIClassAction.com. If you are a member of the Class, your rights will be affected by the pending Action and the Settlement, and you may be entitled to share in the Net Settlement Fund. If you have not yet received the Notice, you may obtain a copy by contacting the Settlement Administrator at: Brad Ihle v. Theodore J. Brombach, c/o A.B. Data, Ltd., P.O. Box 170500, Milwaukee, WI 53217, 866-588-6348, info@XPDIClassAction.com. A copy of the Notice can also be downloaded from the Settlement Website, www.XPDIClassAction.com. If the Settlement is approved by the Court and the Effective Date occurs, the Net Settlement Fund will be distributed on a pro rata basis to Eligible Class Members in accordance with the terms of the proposed Plan of Allocation stated in the Notice or such other plan of allocation as is approved by the Court. Each Eligible Class Member will be eligible to receive a pro rata payment from the Net Settlement Fund equal to the product of (a) the Net Settlement Fund; and (b) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of Eligible Shares held by the Eligible Class Member, and the denominator of which is the total number of Eligible Shares in the Class. As explained in further detail in the Notice, Eligible Class Members do not have to submit a claim form to receive a payment from the Settlement. Any objections to the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, or Plaintiff's Counsel's application for the Fee and Expense Award must be filed with the Register in Chancery in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and delivered to Plaintiff's Counsel and Defendants' Counsel so that they are received no later than February 24, 2026, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice. Please do not contact the Court or the Office of the Register in Chancery regarding this Summary Notice. All questions about this Summary Notice, the Settlement, or your eligibility to participate in the Settlement should be directed to the Settlement Administrator or Plaintiff's Counsel. Requests for the Notice should be made to the Settlement Administrator: Brad Ihle v. Theodore J. Brombach c/o A.B. Data, Ltd. P.O. Box 170500 Milwaukee, WI 53217 Telephone: 866-588-6348 Email: info@XPDIClassAction.com Website: www.XPDIClassAction.com Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice, should be made to Plaintiff's Counsel: Justin O. Reliford, Esquire Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1405 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: 302.578.7344 Email: jreliford@scott-scott.com BY ORDER OF THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE: Dated: December 19, 2025 Any capitalized terms used in this Summary Notice that are not otherwise defined in this Summary Notice shall have the meanings given to them in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, Compromise, and Release between Plaintiffs and Defendants, dated November 13, 2025 (the "Stipulation"). A copy of the Stipulation is available at www.XPDIClassAction.com ********* S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA. Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L. Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors. Copyright 2026. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272. This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the publishers. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed. The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000. *** End of Transmission ***