250923.mbx

250923.mbx C L A S S A C T I O N R E P O R T E R Tuesday, September 23, 2025, Vol. 27, No. 190 Headlines 3M COMPANY: Agacinski-Vazquez Suit Transferred to D. South Carolina 3M COMPANY: Ford Suit Transferred to D. South Carolina 3M COMPANY: Langston Files Suit in D. South Carolina 3M COMPANY: Williams Suit Transferred to D. South Carolina A1 DEVELOPMENT: Lejman Files TCPA Suit in N.D. Illinois AGI CARGO: Campbell Suit Removed to C.D. California AGRINEXT FUND INC: Jackson Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES: Vulgaris Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. AMAZON.COM INC: Parties Seek OK of Limited Sealing Request AMERICAN AIRLINES: Sanchez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ANYTIME FITNESS: Bukowiec Files TCPA Suit in D. New Jersey ARCTIC GLACIER: Hefley Suit Removed to E.D. California ASHFORD INC: Class Settlement in Mooney Suit Gets Final Nod ASM GLOBAL: Settlement in Hoover Gets Prelim OK BANNER HEALTH: Extension of Class Cert Deadlines Sought BANNER HEALTH: Laboy Suit Removed to D. Colorado BAPTIST HEALTH: Wolman Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri BEACH ENERGY: Class Action Opt-Out Deadline Set for Nov. 7 BERKSHIRE BANK: Stevens Files Suit in N.D. New York CAREERIST INC: All Discovery in Wright Due Sept. 11, 2026 CARETRACKER INC: Forbes Files Suit in W.D. New York CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY: Caruso Files Suit in Pa. Ct. of Common Pleas CATAPULT LEARNING WEST: Cobos Suit Removed to C.D. California CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT: Fling for Class Cert Bid Due May 1, 2026 CHART INDUSTRIES: M&A Investigates Sale to Baker Hughes CHS INC: Decker Suit Removed to W.D. Washington COLUMBIA DEBT: Parties Seek More Time to File Class Cert Bid COLUMN GROUP: $6MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 21 COMPUTER HAUS: Seeks Reconsideration of Class Certification Order CONTINENTAL TIRE: Slattery Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime CONTRACTORS CAREER CENTERS: Vakil Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. CREDIT SUISSE: $115MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 17 CRST INTERNATIONAL: Cheatham Seeks Conditional Class Certification DANIEL GRYFE: Kolotkin Sues Over Untimely Paid Wages DEFIANT DREAM: Mcgettigan Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida DELTA AIR: Goodyear Allowed to File Exhibits Under Seal DERMARITE INDUSTRIES: Fenton Files Suit in W.D. Pennsylvania DEVELOPMENT DIMENSIONS: Rounds Sues Over California Trap Breach DIYCOSTSEG LLC: Raslavich Suit Removed to M.D. Florida EARL'S RESTAURANT: Espinoza Sues Over Discriminative Website EPISOURCE LLC: Dunlap Suit Removed to E.D. California EQT CORP: $167.5MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 30 EXPRESS IMAGING SERVICES: Cano Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. EYEDEAL PROPERTIES: Mackey Sues Over Disabled's Access to Property FCA US LLC: Shores-Gaston Suit Removed to N.D. Ohio FCA US: Appeals Tossed Class Decertification Bid in Soares Suit FOOTHILL HOUSE: Hannan Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. FPG LABS: Court Dismisses Klosowski Class Action FPI MANAGEMENT: Data Breach Class Settlement Offers Cash Payments FUTURE MOTION INC: Milbeck Suit Transferred to N.D. California GANNETT CO: Court Dismisses Bradley's Claims GEN DIGITAL INC: Karwowski Data Privacy Row Dismissed GRAF ACQUISITION: $4.75MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 7 GRUMA CORPORATION: Gomez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. HAYDON CORPORATION: Autra Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. HECTOR RIOS: Burk Loses Bid for Class Certification HONDA MOTOR: Filing for Class Cert Bid Extended to Feb. 9, 2026 HOSPITAL SISTERS: Natalie Bid to Seal Class Cert Docs Tossed ICF TECHNOLOGY: Nizeul Must File Class Cert Response by Sept. 25 ILLINOIS: Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Response IRON CHEF HIBACHI: Liu FLSA Suit Transferred to S.D. New York ITHACA ENERGY: Alberta Court Approves Securities Class Settlement JEOMILL REALTY CORP: Lopez Sues Over Unlawful Barriers JETBLUE AIRWAYS: Parties Must Confer Class Cert Deadlines JUST ENERGY: $25MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 15 KANDLELIGHT LLC: Brown Sues Over Discriminative Premises KIA AMERICA: Filing for Class Certification Bid Due June 1, 2026 LATCH INC: $1.95MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Dec. 9 LEO'S SF LLC: Rodas Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. LTF CLUB: Class Settlement in Turner Suit Gets Initial Nod MAGIC MOUNTAIN: Winters Suit Removed to C.D. California METAL TRANSPORT: Filing for Class Cert Bid Due April 3, 2026 MIA AESTHETICS: Wilson Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida MONOLITHIC POWER: Consolidated Complaint Filing Due Nov. 12 NAVY FEDERAL: Faces Edey Suit Over Unauthorized Personal Loans NEW START: Appeals Arbitration and Dismissal Order in Lambert Suit NEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN: UFCW Local Files Antitrust Trust NEW YORK: Deprives Medical Health Treatment, Dunn Suit Says NHB Holdings: Spann Files Suit in N.D. Ohio OCTAPHARMA PLASMA: Settles Data Breach Class Suit for $2.55-Mil. OLAPLEX HOLDINGS: $47.5MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Dec. 1 PACIFIC MARITIME: McColley Suit Removed to S.D. California PAMT INVESTMENT: Caruso Sues Over Accommodation Barriers PANAMERICAN CONSULTING: Dumay-Mellon Suit Removed to D. New Jersey PANDADOC INC: Pretrial Management Order Entered on Senior Suit PICO ENTERPRISES: Kennedy Suit Removed to C.D. California PRESTIGE MAINTENANCE: Rosales Files Suit in E.D. New York PROPERTIES 2000-RICHMOND: Mellenthin Sues Over Physical Barriers R & S BEVERAGE: Mejorado Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. R.J. REYNOLDS: Filing for Class Certification Due Nov. 5, 2026 RB GLOBAL INC.: Haxton Masonry Suit Transferred to N.D. Illinois REYNOLDS CONSUMER: Parties Must File Update on Settlement Status RIVER POINT FARMS: Barak Suit Removed to E.D. Washington ROCKY BRANDS: Filing for Class Cert Bid Due May 8, 2026 SANTANDER CONSUMER: Wins Summary Judgment v. Hanson SELLAN STRUCTURAL: Seeks to Stay Class Cert Response SHEEX INC: Devivo Suit Removed to W.D. Washington SHOMA GROUP: Class Settlement in Castillo Suit Gets Initial Nod SILVERGATE CAPITAL: Court Certifies Settlement Class SINGULARITY FUTURE: $6.5MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Dec. 17 TARGET CORPORATION: Davis Suit Removed to C.D. California TEA DATING ADVICE: Diaz Suit Removed to N.D. Illinois TEA DATING ADVICE: Honeycutt Suit Removed to N.D. Illinois TESLA INC: Court Certifies Rule 23 Classes in Matsko Lawsuit THERAPYMATCH INC: Siegel Suit Removed to N.D. California TOURMALINE BIO: Monteverde & Associates Probes Sale to Novartis TRANSUNION LLC: Fails to Secure Customers' Personal Info, Engh Says TTI OUTDOOR: Faces Class Lawsuit Over Defective Pressure Washers ULTA BEAUTY: Leach Files Suit in Fla. Cir. Ct. V.F. CORP: Faces Class Action Suit for Misleading Investors VAN LUU: Murillo Sues Over Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation VINE HILL: M&A Investigates Merger With CoinShares International WARREN TRANSPORT: Beissel Seeks Conditional Status Action WEBTPA EMPLOYER: Final Approval Hearing in $13.75M Deal Set Nov. 19 YURI SUSHI: Appeals Judgment in Lin Wage-and-Hour Suit to 2nd Cir. ********* 3M COMPANY: Agacinski-Vazquez Suit Transferred to D. South Carolina ------------------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Paul Agacinski-Vazquez, et al, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 3M Company, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-01233 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, to the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina on Aug. 29, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-11749-RMG to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Personal Inj. Prod. Liability. 3M -- http://www.3m.com/-- is an American multinational conglomerate operating in the fields of industry, worker safety, healthcare, and consumer goods.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Benjamin Houston Joyce, Esq. R. Bryant McCulley, Esq. Shane Hanson Hursh, Esq. ASHCRAFT AND GEREL 701 East Bay Street, Suite 411 Charleston, SC 29403 Phone: (843) 699-8280 Email: bjoyce@ashcraftlaw.com bmcculley@ashcraftlaw.com shursh@ashcraftlaw.com 3M COMPANY: Ford Suit Transferred to D. South Carolina ------------------------------------------------------ The case styled as Darrell D. Ford, et al., and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 3M Company, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-01369 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, to the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina on Sept. 9, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-12376-RMG to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Personal Inj. Prod. Liability. 3M -- http://www.3m.com/-- is an American multinational conglomerate operating in the fields of industry, worker safety, healthcare, and consumer goods.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Gary A. Anderson, Esq. Gregory A. Cade, Esq. Kevin B. McKie, Esq. Yahn Eric Olson, esq. ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION GROUP PC 2160 Highland Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35205 Phone: (205) 328-9200 Fax: (205) 328-9206 Email: gary@elglaw.com GregC@elglaw.com kmckie@elglaw.com yolson@elglaw.com 3M COMPANY: Langston Files Suit in D. South Carolina ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against 3M Company, et al. The case is styled as Carter Langston, and all others similarly situated v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company); AGC Chemicals Americas Inc.; Allstar Fire Equipment Company; Amerex Corporation; Archroma U.S., Inc.; Arkema Inc.; BASF Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Ciba, Inc.; Buckeye Fire Equipment Company; Carrier Global Corporation; CB Garment Inc.; ChemDesign Products Incorporated; Chemguard Inc.; Chemicals Incorporated; The Chemours Company LLC; Chubb Fire LTD; Clariant Corporation; Corteva, Inc.; Daikin America, Inc; Deepwater Chemicals Inc.; Dupont de Nemours, Inc. (f/k/a DowDupont, Inc.); Dynax Corporation; E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company; Fire-Dex, LLC; Fire Service Plus, Inc.; Johnson Controls, Inc.; Kidde PLC, Inc.; Nation Ford Chemical Company; National Foam, Inc.; Perimeter Solutions, LP; Raytheon Technologies Corporation; Ricochet Manufacturing Company, Inc.; Technologies, Inc.; The Chemours Company; Tyco Fire Products LP, as successor-in-interest to the Ansul Company; United Technologies Corporation; UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc (f/k/a GE Interlogix, Inc.); Witmer Public Safety Group Inc.; Case No. 2:25-cv-12431-RMG (D.S.C., Sept. 10, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Personal Inj. Prod. Liability for Personal Injury. 3M -- http://www.3m.com/-- is an American multinational conglomerate operating in the fields of industry, worker safety, healthcare, and consumer goods.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Yechiel Shenkar, Esq. MARC J. BERN AND PARTNERS LLP (PA) 101 West Elm Street, Suite 520 Conshohocken, PA 19428 Phone: (610) 941-4444 Email: jshenkar@bernllp.com 3M COMPANY: Williams Suit Transferred to D. South Carolina ---------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Johnny Williams, et al., and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 3M Company, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-01395 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, to the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina on Sept. 9, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-12375-RMG to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Personal Inj. Prod. Liability. 3M -- http://www.3m.com/-- is an American multinational conglomerate operating in the fields of industry, worker safety, healthcare, and consumer goods.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Gary A. Anderson, Esq. Gregory A. Cade, Esq. Kevin B. McKie, Esq. Yahn Eric Olson, esq. ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION GROUP PC 2160 Highland Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35205 Phone: (205) 328-9200 Fax: (205) 328-9206 Email: gary@elglaw.com GregC@elglaw.com kmckie@elglaw.com yolson@elglaw.com A1 DEVELOPMENT: Lejman Files TCPA Suit in N.D. Illinois ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against A1 Development LLC. The case is styled as Kyle Lejman, individually on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. A1 Development LLC doing business as: No Limit Coins, Case No. 1:25-cv-10984 (N.D. Ill., Sept. 11, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud for Other Contract. A1 Development LLC doing business as No Limit Coins -- https://nolimitcoins.com/ -- a Social Gaming Platform is a play-for-fun website intended for amusement purposes only.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Scott Edelsberg, I, Esq. EDELSBERG LAW PA 20900 NE 30th Avenue, Suite 417 Aventura, FL 33180 Phone: (305) 975-3320 Email: scott@edelsberglaw.com AGI CARGO: Campbell Suit Removed to C.D. California --------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Donald Campbell, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. AGI CARGO, LLC, a corporation; and DOES 1 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No. CVRI2503027 was removed from the Superior Court of State of California in and for the County of Riverside, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on Sept. 11, 2025, and assigned Case No. 5:25-cv-02394. The Complaint is a purported class action alleging the following causes of action: Unpaid Minimum Wages And Liquidated Damages; Unpaid Overtime Wages; Meal Period Violations; Rest Period Violations; Wage Statement Violations; Waiting Time Penalties; Business Expense Reimbursement; Unfair Competition; and Violations of The Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA").[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Marissa Alguire, Esq. Mojan Anari, Esq. Felipe Gomez, Esq. AKERMAN LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 6400 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: (213) 688-9500 Facsimile: (213) 627-6342 Emails marissa.alguire@akerman.com mojan.anari@akerman.com felipe.gomez@akerman.com AGRINEXT FUND INC: Jackson Sues Over Blind-Inaccessible Website --------------------------------------------------------------- Sylinia Jackson, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated v. AGRINEXT FUND INC., Case No. 1:25-cv-07553 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 11, 2025), is brought against the Defendants for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully and equally accessible to and independently usable by Plaintiff and other blind or visually impaired people. The Defendant's denial of full and equal access to its website, and therefore denial of its services offered thereby, is a violation of the Plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Because the Defendant's website, https://oleyhealthandwellness.com/, including all portions thereof or accessed thereon (collectively, the "Website" or "Defendant's website"), is not equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, it violates the ADA. The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that the Defendant's website will become and remain accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers. By failing to make its Website available in a manner compatible with computer screen reader programs, the Defendant deprives blind and visually-impaired individuals the benefits of its online goods, content, and services--all benefits it affords nondisabled individuals--thereby increasing the sense of isolation and stigma among those persons that Title III was meant to redress, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software to read website content using her computer. AGRINEXT FUND INC., operates the Oley Health and Wellness online retail store, as well as the Oley Health and Wellness interactive Website and advertises, markets, and operates in the State of New York and throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq. Michael A. LaBollita, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq. GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES 150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR New York, N.Y. 10003-2461 Phone: (212) 228-9795 Fax: (212) 982-6284 Email: dana@gottlieb.legal michael@gottlieb.legal jeffrey@gottlieb.legal ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES: Vulgaris Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Alpha Technologies Services, Inc. The case is styled as Nicholas Vulgaris, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. Alpha Technologies Services, Inc. d/b/a Nevada Alpha Construction Services, Case No. 25CV141962 (Cal. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty., Seppt. 10, 2025). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case." Alpha Technologies -- https://www.alpha.com/ -- provides the Cable TV/Broadband, Industrial and Renewable Energy industries.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Emma Geesaman, Esq. Roman Shkodnik, Esq. D.LAW, INC. 450 N Brand Blvd., Ste. 840 Glendale, CA 91203-2920 Phone: 818-962-6465 Email: e.geesaman@d.law r.shkodnik@d.law AMAZON.COM INC: Parties Seek OK of Limited Sealing Request ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ELIZABETH DE COSTER, et al., v. AMAZON.COM, INC., Case No. 2:21-cv-00693-JHC (W.D. Wash.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order granting limited sealing request. The parties conferred in good faith regarding potential redactions and filed a joint statement on Aug. 29, 2025, with proposed redactions reflecting Amazon's and non party's confidential information which merits sealing. It has since come to the plaintiffs' attention that good cause and compelling reasons exist to redact an additional statement in the Class Certification Order, which contains a third-party's non-public and competitively sensitive business information. Amazon does not oppose the additional redaction. Amazon.com is an online retailer that offers a wide range of products. A copy of the Parties' motion dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=4G9ycy at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Steve W. Berman, Esq. Barbara A. Mahoney, Esq. Anne F. Johnson, Esq. Kelly Fan, Esq. HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 E-mail: steve@hbsslaw.com barbaram@hbsslaw.com annej@hbsslaw.com kellyf@hbsslaw.com - and - Zina G. Bash, Esq. Jessica Beringer, Esq. Shane Kelly, Esq. Alex Dravillas, Esq. Roseann R. Romano, Esq. KELLER POSTMAN LLC 111 Congress Avenue, Suite 500 Austin, TX, 78701 Telephone: (512) 690-0990 E-mail: zina.bash@kellerpostman.com Jessica.Beringer@kellerpostman.com shane.kelly@kellerpostman.com ajd@kellerpostman.com Roseann.Romano@kellerpostman.com - and - Steig D. Olson, Esq. David D. LeRay, Esq. Nic V. Siebert, Esq. Adam B. Wolfson, Esq. Maxwell P. Deabler-Meadows, Esq. Elle Mahdavi, Esq. Aseem Chipalkatti, Esq. QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 1109 First Avenue, Suite 210 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 905-7000 E-mail: steigolson@quinnemanuel.com davidleray@quinnemanuel.com nicolassiebert@quinnemanuel.com maxmeadows@quinnemanuel.com adamwolfson@quinnemanuel.com ellemahdavi@quinnemanuel.com aseemchipalkatti@quinnemanuel.com The Defendant is represented by: John A. Goldmark, Esq. MaryAnn Almeida, Esq. Emily Parsons, Esq. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 Telephone: (206) 622-3150 Facsimile: (206) 757-7700 E-mail: JohnGoldmark@dwt.com MaryAnnAlmeida@dwt.com EmilyParsons@dwt.com - and - Karen L. Dunn, Esq. William A. Isaacson, Esq. Amy J. Mauser, Esq. Kyle Smith, Esq. Meredith Dearborn, Esq. DUNN ISAACSON RHEE LLP 401 Ninth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-2637 Telephone: (202) 240-2900 E-mail: kdunn@dirllp.com wisaacson@dirllp.com amauser@dirllp.com ksmith@dirllp.com mdearborn@dirllp.com AMERICAN AIRLINES: Sanchez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. -------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against American Airlines, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Hugo Sanchez, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. American Airlines, Inc., Compass Group USA, Inc., Case No. 25STCV26634 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., Sept. 11, 2025). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." American Airlines, Inc. -- https://www.aa.com/homePage.do -- is a major airline in the United States headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas, within the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex, and is the largest airline in the world in terms of passengers carried and daily flights.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Marcus J. Bradley, Esq. BRADLEY/GROMBACHER LLP 31365 Oak Crest Dr., Ste. 240 Westlake Village, CA 91361 Phone: 805-270-7100 Fax: 805-270-7589 Email: mbradley@bradleygrombacher.com ANYTIME FITNESS: Bukowiec Files TCPA Suit in D. New Jersey ---------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Anytime Fitness, LLC. The case is styled as Jaiden Bukowiec, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Anytime Fitness, LLC, Case No. 2:25-cv-15473 (D.N.J., Sept. 11, 2025). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Anytime Fitness -- https://www.anytimefitness.com/ -- is an American franchise of 24-hour health and fitness clubs that is based in Woodbury, Minnesota.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kayla Nicole Kershen, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE, P.A. 14 NE 1st Ave., Ste 705 Miami, FL 33132 Phone: (989) 574-5262 Email: kkershen@shamisgentile.com ARCTIC GLACIER: Hefley Suit Removed to E.D. California ------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Gary D. Hefley, II, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ARCTIC GLACIER U.S.A., INC.; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Case No. BCV-25-102359 was removed from the Superior Court of California, County of Kern, to the United States District Court for Eastern District of California on Sept. 10, 2025, and assigned Case No. 1:25-cv-01169-JLT-CDB. The Complaint asserts claims for: failure to pay minimum wages; failure to pay overtime wages; failure to provide meal breaks; failure to permit rest breaks; failure to reimburse business expenses; failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements; failure to pay all wages due upon separation of employment: and violation of California Business and Professions Code.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Spencer C. Skeen, Esq. Marlene M. Moffitt, Esq. Marie M. Hulen, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 4660 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92122 Phone: 858-652-3110 Facsimile: 858-652-3101 Email: spencer.skeen@ogletree.com marlene.moffitt@ogletree.com marie.hulen@ogletree.com ASHFORD INC: Class Settlement in Mooney Suit Gets Final Nod ----------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as SEAN MOONEY AND JONATHAN BONNETTE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. ASHFORD, INC., Case No. 3:24-cv-00279-K (N.D. Tex.), the Hon. Judge Ed Kinkeade entered an order granting final approval of class action settlement and final judgment: 1. The Court grants final approval to its appointment of the Plaintiffs Sean Mooney and Jonathan Bonnette as the Class Representatives. 2. The Court grants final approval to its appointment of Class Counsel as provided in the amended preliminary approval order, appointing Joe Kendall of the law firm Kendall Law Group, PLLC, David K. Lietz of the law firm Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, LLC, and Kevin Laukaitis of the law firm Laukaitis Law LLC. 3. The Court certifies the following Class for settlement purposes under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3), subject to the Class exclusions set forth in the Amended Settlement Agreement: "All Persons who have been identified as having their Personal Information potentially affected by the Data Incident." The "Data Incident" refers to the unauthorized access to Ashford's data environment which occurred on Sept. 20, 2023. 4. The Court approves payment of attorneys' fees in the amount of $161,666.67, plus $2,141.78 in litigation expenses. These amounts shall be taken out of the Settlement Fund pursuant to the terms of the Amended Settlement Agreement. 5. The Court approves service awards in the amount of $2,500.00 to each of the Settlement Class Representatives, to be paid from the Settlement Fund. Ashford provides investment management services. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=lSfEKG at no extra charge.[CC] ASM GLOBAL: Settlement in Hoover Gets Prelim OK ----------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Shea Hoover v. ASM Global Parent, Inc., Case No. 2:24-cv-10794-WLH-PVC (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Hsu entered an order: -- Granting the Plaintiff's motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement, -- Conditionally certifying the Settlement Class: "All United States residents whose Private Information was compromised in the Data Security Incident detected by Defendant on or about October 12, 2023." -- Appointing the Plaintiff Shea Hoover as Settlement Class Representative, -- Appointing M. Anderson Berry and Gregory Haroutunian of Clayeo Arnold APLC and J. Gerard Stranch, IV and Grayson Wells of Stranch, Jennings & Garvey, PLLC as Settlement Class Counsel and preliminarily approves the Settlement Agreement. The Court orders the following schedule pursuant to the Settlement Agreement: (1) Simpluris shall commence notice; (2) Settlement Class Members must opt out or object to the settlement within 60 days of the Notice Commencement Date. (3) Settlement Class Members must submit claims within 90 days of the Notice Commencement Date; and (4) Any motion for attorneys' fees and expenses or service award must be filed within 45 days of the Notice Commencement Date. ASM operates as a sports and live entertainment company. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Uh4Bi5 at no extra charge.[CC] BANNER HEALTH: Extension of Class Cert Deadlines Sought ------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Cheryl McCulley, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Banner Health, Case No. 2:23-cv-00985-SPL (D. Ariz.), the Parties ask the Court to enter the following proposed amended case scheduling order: 1. Motion for class certification and Nov. 26, 2025 Plaintiffs' class certification expert disclosure deadline: 2. Settlement discussions deadline: Oct. 24, 2025 3. Opposition to class certification Jan. 9, 2026 and Defendants' class certification expert Disclosure Deadline: 4. Reply in support of class Jan. 30, 2026 certification deadline: 5. Class certification discovery Jan. 30, 2026 deadline: 6. Expert disclosures deadline: Dec. 15, 2025 7. Rebuttal disclosures deadline: Jan. 14, 2026 8. Expert depositions deadline: Feb. 13, 2026 9. Dispositive motions deadline: Feb. 20, 2026 Banner provides medical care and services. A copy of the Parties' motion dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=sTYuv6 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Hart L. Robinovitch, Esq. Ryan J. Ellersick, Esq. ZIMMERMAN REED LLP 14648 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 130 Scottsdale, AZ 85254 Telephone: (480) 348-6400 Facsimile: (480) 348-6415 E-mail: hart.robinovitch@zimmreed.com - and - David S. Almeida, Esq. Elena A. Belov, Esq. ALMEIDA LAW GROUP LLC 849 W. Webster Avenue Chicago, IL 60614 Telephone: (312) 576-3024 E-mail: david@afmeidalawgroup.com elena@almeidalawgroup.com - and - Mark S. Reich, Esq. LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP 55 Broadway, 4th Floor, Suite 427 New York, NY 10006 Telephone: (212) 363-7500 Facsimile: (212 363-7171 E-mail: mreich@zlk.com - and - Kevin D. Neal, Esq. William F. King, Esq. Kenneth N. Ralston, Esq. GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A. 2575 East Camelback Road Phoenix, AZ 85016-9225 - and - Gary M. Klinger, Esq. Glen L. Abramson, Esq. Alexandra M. Honeycutt, Esq. MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC 227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2100 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (866) 252-0878 E-mail: gklinger@milberg.com gabramson@milberg.com ahoneycutt@milberg.com - and - Bryan L. Bleichner, Esq. Philip J. Krzeski, Esq. CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1700 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Telephone: (612) 339-7300 Facsimile: (612) 336-2940 E-mail: bbleichner@chestnutcambronne.com pkrzeski@cliestnutcambronne.com - and - Terence R. Coates, Esq. Dylan J. Gould, Esq. MARKOVITS, STOCK & DEMARCO, LLC 119 E. Court St., Ste. 530 Cincinnati, OH 4502 Telephone: (513) 651-3700 Facsimile: (513) 665-0219 E-mail: tcoates@msdlegal.com dgould@msdlegal.com - and - Joseph M. Lyon, Esq. THE LYON FIRM 2754 Erie Ave. Cincinnati, OH 45208 Telephone: (513) 381-2333 Facsimile: (513) 766-9011 E-mail: jlyon@thelyonfirm.com - and - Cristina Perez Hesano, Esq. PEREZ LAW GROUP PLLC 7508 N 59th Ave. Glendale, AZ 85301 Telephone: (623) 826-5593 E-mail: cperez@perezlawgroup.com The Defendant is represented by: George H. King, Esq. Brian J. Pouderoyen, Esq. LANG THAL KING & HANSON 6730 N. Scottsdale Rd., Suite 101 Scottsdale, AZ 85253 - and - Casie D. Collignon, Esq. Alexander Vitruk, Esq. Jonathan S. Maddalone, Esq. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 1801 California Street, Suite 4400 Denver, CO 80202 E-mail: ccollignon@bakerlaw.com avitruk@bakerlaw.com jmaddalone@bakerlaw.com BANNER HEALTH: Laboy Suit Removed to D. Colorado ------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Tracy Laboy, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. BANNER HEALTH, Case No. 2025CV032862 was removed from the District Court of Denver County, to the United States District Court for District of Colorado on Sept. 11, 2025, and assigned Case No. 1:25-cv-02868. The Plaintiff asserts three causes of action: Violation of the Colorado Wage Claim Act ("CWCA"), Violation of the Colorado Minimum Wage Act ("CMWA"), and Civil Theft.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Brian Denlinger, Esq. Craig J. Ackermann, Esq. Avi Kreitenberg, Esq. ACKERMAN & TILAJEF, P.C. 2602 North Proctor Street, Suite 205 Tacoma, WA 98406 Email: bd@ackermanntilajef.com cja@ackermanntilajef.com ak@ackermanntilajef.com - and - Alexander Hood, Esq. HOOD LAW OFFICE, PLLC 1312 17th Street, Suite 1028 Denver, CO 80202 Email: alex@hoodlawpllc.com The Defendants are represented by: Michael H. Bell, Esq. Rebecca Lindell, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 2000 S. Colorado Blvd. Tower 3, Suite 900 Denver, CO 80222 Phone: 303-764-6800 Facsimile: 303-831-9246 Email: mike.bell@ogletree.com rebecca.lindell@ogletree.com BAPTIST HEALTH: Wolman Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri -------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as David Wolman, Spencer Sandburg, Machelle Bell, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Baptist Health South Florida, Inc.; Cerner Corporation doing business as: Oracle Health; Case No. 1:25-cv-23432 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri on Sept. 11, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 4:25-cv-00707-WBG to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract. Baptist Health South Florida -- https://baptisthealth.net/ -- is a faith-based not-for-profit healthcare organization and clinical care network in Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Steven Patrick Sukert, Esq. Jeffrey Miles Ostrow, Esq. Kopelowitz Ostrow PA 1 W Las Olas Blvd., Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33131 Phone: (954) 284-1520 Fax: (954) 525-4300 Email: sukert@kolawyers.com ostrow@kolawyers.com - and - Melissa R. Emert, Esq. KANTROWITZ, GOLDHAMER & GRAIFMAN, P.C 135 Chestnut Ridge Road Suite 200 Montvale, NJ 07645 Phone: (201) 391-7000 Email: memert@kgglaw.com The Defendants are represented by: Julie Singer Brady, Esq. BAKER & HOSTETLER 200 S Orange Ave Orlando, FL 32801 Phone: (407) 649-4832 Email: jsingerbrady@bakerlaw.com BEACH ENERGY: Class Action Opt-Out Deadline Set for Nov. 7 ---------------------------------------------------------- Nelson & Nelson v Beach Energy Limited (ACN 007 617 969) Proceeding No. S ECI 2021 04440 BEACH ENERGY CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF REGISTRATION AND OPT-OUT This is an important notice about the BEACH ENERGY CLASS ACTION. The Supreme Court of Victoria in Australia has ordered that a Registration and Opt-Out Notice be published to group members who have acquired AMERICAN DEPOSITORY RECEIPTS that represent ordinary shares in BEACH ENERGY LIMITED (Beach), listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). The Beach Energy Class Action has been brought on behalf of those group members and their legal rights may be affected by the action. You can access the Registration and Opt-Out Notice at Slater and Gordon's website at: https://www.slatergordon.com.au/class-actions/current-class-actions/beach-energy-limited-class-action Or the Supreme Court of Victoria's website at: https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/areas/group-proceedings/beach-energy/opting-out THE REGISTRATION AND OPT-OUT NOTICE IS IMPORTANT, THE NOTICE REQUIRES YOU TO REVIEW AND TAKE STEPS BY NOVEMBER 7, 2025 PLEASE READ THE NOTICE CAREFULLY, AS IT MAY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS, You should read the Notice of Registration and Opt-Out before deciding what to do. This publication is not a substitute for the Notice of Registration and Opt-Out, and you should read that Notice on Slater and Gordon's website carefully as it may affect your legal rights. WHAT IS THE BEACH ENERGY CLASS ACTION ABOUT? The class action claims that Beach engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and breached its continuous disclosure obligations to the market as a company listed on the ASX. The class action alleges that, because of this conduct, group members who acquired ordinary shares, AMERICAN DEPOSITORY RECEIPTS or long exposure to Beach shares by entering into equity swaps, paid more than would have been the case had Beach complied with its obligations. Beach denies these allegations. AM I ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE? You may be a Group Member in this class action if between August 17, 2020 to April 29, 2021 (inclusive) you acquired, or entered into a contract to acquire, any of the following: * ordinary shares in Beach traded on the ASX (ASX: BPT); or * AMERICAN DEPOSITORY RECEIPTS that represent ordinary shares in Beach; or * long exposure to Beach shares by entering into equity swap confirmations in respect of Beach shares. WHAT ARE MY OPTIONS? If you wish to participate in any settlement, or opt-out of this proceeding, YOU MUST TAKE ACTION BY 4:00 PM (AEDT) NOVEMBER 7, 2025. 1. OPTION 1 - REGISTER. You must register by 4:00 p.m. (AEDT) on 7November 7, 2025 to be eligible to receive any compensation if there is a settlement reached on or before 21 September 2026. You can register at https:// www.slatergordon.com.au/class-actions/current-class-actions/beach-energy-limited-class-action. 2. OPTION 2 - OPT OUT. If you do not want your rights determined by the Beach Class Action, you must opt out by 4:00 p.m. (AEDT) November 7, 2025. If you opt out, your claim will not be resolved as part of the Beach Class Action but you may pursue such rights as you may have independently. You can opt out at https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/areas/group-proceedings/beach-energy/opting-out 3. OPTION 3 - DO NOTHING. If you do nothing, you will remain a Group Member in the Beach Class Action but, subject to further order of the Court, you will not be permitted to participate in any settlement reached on or before September 21, 2026. You will be bound by any settlement reached but will not be able to seek any benefit under that settlement. This means that your right to bring a claim against Beach (and potentially its related entities and officers) for matters related to those canvassed in the Beach Class Action will be extinguished. WHO SHOULD CONTACT FOR MORE INFORMATION? You can access the Notice of Registration and Opt-Out with more detail at Slater and Gordon's website at: https://www.slatergordon.com.au/class-actions/current-class-actions/beach-energy-limited-class-action If you have any questions, you can contact Slater & Gordon on (011 61) 1800 071 827 or by email to bpt@slatergordon.com.au BERKSHIRE BANK: Stevens Files Suit in N.D. New York --------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Berkshire Bank, et al. The case is styled as Fred Stevens, Plan Administrator, in his capacity as Assignee of Bank Litigation Claims from 369 Holders of Allowed Class 4 Claims in the Marshall "Eight Percent Fund"; Timothy Greenwood, Beth Greenwood, Darlene Stetson, Wayne Stetson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Berkshire Bank, a Massachusetts trust company, other; Beacon Bank & Trust, Case No. 5:25-cv-01256-AJB-TWD (N.D.N.Y., Sept. 10, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud for Fraud. Berkshire Bank -- https://www.berkshirebank.com/ -- offers better banking with Berkshire ONE checking and savings accounts, loans and wealth management.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Todd B. Naylor, Esq. GOLDENBERG SCHNEIDER One West Fourth Street, 18th Floor Cincinnati, OH 45202 Phone: (513) 345-8291 Fax: (513) 345-8294 Email: tnaylor@gs-legal.com - and - Jeffrey S. Goldenberg, Esq. GOLDENBERG SCHNEIDER 4445 Lake Forest Drive, Ste. 490 Cincinnati, OH 45242 Phone: (513) 345-8291 Email: jgoldenberg@gs-legal.com CAREERIST INC: All Discovery in Wright Due Sept. 11, 2026 --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Lawrence Wright, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Careerist, Inc., Case No. 3:25-cv-01059-JFS (M.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge Joseph Saporito, Jr. entered a case management order as follows 1. Any joinder of parties shall be accomplished by Dec. 5, 2025. 2. All discovery shall be completed by Sept. 11, 2026. 3. Reports of the Plaintiff's retained experts on class certification shall be produced by March 13, 2026. Reports of the Defendant's retained experts on class certification shall be produced by Apr. 3, 2026. 4. All case dispositive motions shall be filed by Feb. 12, 2027. 5. Counsel have advised that they anticipate the case will be trial ready in April 2027. Careerist provides software solutions. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=bS5qBA at no extra charge.[CC] CARETRACKER INC: Forbes Files Suit in W.D. New York --------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Artic Glacier U.S.A., Inc. The case is styled as Margie Forbes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Caretracker, Inc., Chatham Orthopaedic Associates, P.A., Case No. 1:25-cv-00847 (W.D.N.Y., Sept. 10, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. CareTracker, Inc. -- https://www.caretracker.com/default.asp -- is an organization that provides practice management software to medical practices and clinics.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Randi A. Kassan, Esq. MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, LLC 100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500 Garden City, NY 11530 Phone: (516) 741-5600 Fax: (516) 741-0128 Email: rkassan@milberg.com CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY: Caruso Files Suit in Pa. Ct. of Common Pleas ------------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Carpenter Technology Corporation. The case is styled as Kevin Caruso, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. Carpenter Technology Corporation, Case No. 250901344 (Pa. Ct. of Common Pleas, Philadelphia Cty., Sept. 11, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract. Carpenter Technology Corporation -- https://www.carpentertechnology.com/ -- engages in the manufacture, fabrication, and distribution of specialty metals in the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Peter Winebrake, Esq. WINEBRAKE & SANTILLO, LLC 715 Twining Road, Suite 211 Dresher, PA 19025 Phone: (215) 884-2491 Email: pwinebrake@winebrakelaw.com CATAPULT LEARNING WEST: Cobos Suit Removed to C.D. California ------------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Silvia Leticia Barraza Cobos, individually, and on behalf of other similarly situated employees v. CATAPULT LEARNING WEST, LLC; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Case No. 25STCV21793 was removed from the Superior Court for the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on Sept. 11, 2025, and assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-08627. The Complaint asserts the following causes of action: Minimum Wages; Unpaid Overtime; Meal Break Violations; Rest Break Violations; Wages Not Timely Paid During Employment; Wage Statement Violations; Untimely Final Wages; Failure to Reimburse Necessary Business Expenses; Unlawful Non-Compete/Non-Solicitation Agreements; and all in Violation of Cal. Business & Professions Codes and Violations of Cal. Labor Codes.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Brittany L. McCarthy, Esq. Sarah R. Boxer, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: 619.232.0441 Facsimile: 619.232.4302 Email: blmccarthy@littler.com sboxer@littler.com CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT: Fling for Class Cert Bid Due May 1, 2026 --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ANDRE CANTEY, JAMES BATTLE, and TERRENCE BOSTON, v. CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, INC., Case No. 1:25-cv-04843-LJL (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Lewis Liman entered an order that the Plaintiffs' motions for Rule 23 class certification and for conditional certification under the Fair Labor Standards Act shall be filed by May 1, 2026. The Order memorializes the Court's orders issued on the record. The Defendant's motion for a stay of discovery is denied. The parties are encouraged to meet and confer regarding the order in which discovery will be conducted. On the Plaintiffs' consent, the Defendant's deadline to respond to the Amended Complaint is extended from Sept. 8, 2025, to Sept. 19, 2025. The Court held an initial pretrial conference on Sept. 3, 2025. Center offers comprehensive employment services. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=OD8YmV at no extra charge.[CC] CHART INDUSTRIES: M&A Investigates Sale to Baker Hughes ------------------------------------------------------- Class Action Attorney Juan Monteverde with Monteverde & Associates PC, a law firm headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City, is investigating: -- Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS) related to its sale to Baker Hughes Co. for $210.00 per share in cash. ACT NOW. The Shareholder Vote is scheduled for October 6, 2025. Visit link for more information https://monteverdelaw.com/case/chart-industries-inc/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you. -- scPharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: SCPH) related to its sale to MannKind Corporation. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, scPharmaceuticals' shareholders will receive $5.35per share in cash plus one non-tradeable contingent value right per share payable upon achieving specific regulatory and net sales milestones worth up to $1.00 in cash. Visit link for more information https://monteverdelaw.com/case/scpharmaceuticals-inc/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you. -- Vital Energy, Inc. (NYSE: VTLE) related to its merger with Crescent Energy Company. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Vital shareholders will have their shares converted into 1.9062 shares of Crescent Class A Common Stock. Visit link for more information https://monteverdelaw.com/case/vital-energy-inc/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you. -- Verint Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: VRNT) related to its sale to Thoma Bravo. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Verint shareholders will receive $20.50 per share in cash. Visit link for more info https://monteverdelaw.com/case/verint-systems-inc/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you. NOT ALL LAW FIRMS ARE THE SAME. Before you hire a law firm, you should talk to a lawyer and ask: 1. Do you file class actions and go to Court? 2. When was the last time you recovered money for shareholders? 3. What cases did you recover money in and how much? About Monteverde & Associates PC Our firm litigates and has recovered money for shareholders…and we do it from our offices in the Empire State Building. We are a national class action securities firm with a successful track record in trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. No company, director or officer is above the law. If you own common stock in the above listed company and have concerns or wish to obtain additional information free of charge, please visit our website or contact Juan Monteverde, Esq. either via e-mail at jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com or by telephone at (212) 971-1341. Contact: Juan Monteverde, Esq. MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC The Empire State Building 350 Fifth Ave. Suite 4740 New York, NY 10118 Tel: (212) 971-1341 E-mail: jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com [GN] CHS INC: Decker Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ----------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Devin Decker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CHS INC., a Minnesota corporation, Case No. 25-2-01701-18 was removed from the Superior Court of Kitsap County, Washington, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on Sept. 11, 2025, and assigned Case No. 3:25-cv-05811. The Plaintiff asserts eight causes of action for alleged failure to provide rest periods, alleged failure to provide meal periods, alleged failure to pay overtime wages, alleged payment of wages less than entitled, alleged failure to accrue and allow use of paid sick leave, alleged unlawful deductions and rebates, alleged failure to pay all wages due at termination, and alleged willful refusal to pay wages.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Douglas Han, Esq. Shunt Tatavos-Gharajeh, Esq. Dean Petitta, Esq. JUSTICE LAW CORPORATION 751 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 101 Pasadena, CA 91103 Phone: (818) 230-7502 Fax: (818) 230-7259 Email: dhan@justicelawcorp.com statavos@justicelawcorp.com dpetitta@justicelawcorp.com arheaume@justicelawcorp.com whubbard@justicelawcorp.com The Defendants are represented by: Priya B. Vivian, Esq. Erin M. Wilson, Esq. BALLARD SPAHR LLP 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2800 Seattle, WA 98101-3808 Phone: 206.223.7000 Facsimile: 206.223.7107 Email: vivianp@ballardspahr.com wilsonem@ballardspahr.com COLUMBIA DEBT: Parties Seek More Time to File Class Cert Bid ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as BRYCE ABBINK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. COLUMBIA DEBT RECOVERY, LLC d/b/a GENESIS, Case No. 2:24-cv-00557-MJP (W.D. Wash.), the Parties ask the Court to enter an order extending the class certification motion deadline and the dispositive motion deadline to Dec. 17, 2025. Columbia specializes in collections for the multi-family industry. A copy of the Parties' motion dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=nPqJEx at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Patrick H. Peluso, Esq. PELUSO LAW LLC www.pelusolawfirm.com 865 Albion Street, Ste 250 Denver, CO 80220 Telephone: (720) 805-2008 E-mail: ppeluso@pelusolawfirm.com The Defendant is represented by: David J. Kaminski, Esq. CARLSON & MESSER LLP Website: www.cmtlaw.com 5901 W Century Blvd, Ste 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90045-5445 Telephone: (310) 242-2200 Facsimile: (310) 242-2222 E-mail: KaminskiD@cmtlaw.com COLUMN GROUP: $6MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 21 ---------------------------------------------------------- IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHARLES BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. THE COLUMN GROUP, LP, DAVID V. GOEDDEL, and DAVID J. WOODHOUSE, Defendants. C.A. No.: 2024-1314-MTZ SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR TO: All record holders and beneficial holders of shares of NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. ("NGM" or the "Company") common stock (Nasdaq: "NGM") who either received $1.55 per share in cash at the closing of the take-private transaction between NGM and affiliates of The Column Group, LP (the "Transaction"), on or about April 5, 2024 (the "Closing"), or who dissented from the Transaction, including their respective heirs, successors in interest, successors, transferees, and assigns. PLEASE READ THIS SUMMARY NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR RIGHTS ARE AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the "Court"), that the stockholder class action (the "Action") is pending in the Court. YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that Plaintiff Charles Bryant ("Plaintiff"), individually and on behalf of the Class, has reached a proposed settlement with Defendants The Column Group, LP, David V. Goeddel, and David J. Woodhouse (collectively, "Defendants") for $6,000,000.00 (USD) in cash (the "Settlement"). The terms of the Settlement are stated in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, Compromise, and Release between Plaintiff and Defendants dated July 23, 2025 (the "Stipulation"), a copy of which is available at www.ngmstockholderlitigationsettlement.com. If approved by the Court, the Settlement will resolve all claims in the Action as against Defendants. A hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") will be held on October 21, 2025 at 3:15 p.m., before The Honorable Morgan T. Zurn, Vice Chancellor, either in person at the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, New Castle County, Leonard L. Williams Justice Center, 500 North King Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, or remotely by Zoom or other means (at the discretion of the Court), to, among other things: (i) determine whether to finally certify the Class for Settlement purposes; (ii) determine whether Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel have adequately represented the Settlement Class, and whether Plaintiff should be finally appointed as Class Representative for the Class and Plaintiff's Counsel should be finally appointed as Class Counsel for the Class; (iii) determine whether the proposed Settlement on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Class and in their best interests, and should be approved by the Court; (iv) determine whether a Judgment, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit D to the Stipulation, should be entered dismissing the Action with prejudice as against Defendants and granting the Releases provided under the Stipulation; (v) determine whether the proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund is fair and reasonable, and should therefore be approved; (vi) determine whether the application by Plaintiff's Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses ("Fee and Expense Award") should be approved, including Plaintiff's application for an Incentive Award to be paid solely from any Fee and Expense Award; (vii) hear and rule on any objections to the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and/or to the application by Plaintiff's Counsel for a Fee and Expense Award, including Plaintiff's application for an Incentive Award; and (viii) consider any other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in connection with the Settlement. Any updates regarding the Settlement Hearing, including any changes to the date or time of the hearing or updates regarding in-person or remote appearances at the hearing, will be posted to the Settlement website, www.ngmstockholderlitigationsettlement.com. If you are a member of the Class, your rights will be affected by the pending Action and the Settlement, and you may be entitled to share in the Net Settlement Fund. If you have not yet received the Notice, you may obtain a copy of the Notice by contacting the Administrator at NGM Stockholder Litigation Settlement, c/o A.B. Data, Ltd., P.O. Box 170500, Milwaukee, WI 53217. A copy of the Notice can also be downloaded from the Settlement website, www.ngmstockholderlitigationsettlement.com. If the Settlement is approved by the Court and the Effective Date occurs, the Net Settlement Fund will be distributed on a pro rata basis to "Eligible Class Members" in accordance with the proposed Plan of Allocation stated in the Notice or such other plan of allocation as is approved by the Court. Under the proposed Plan of Allocation, "Eligible Class Members" consist of (i) Eligible Beneficial Holders, the ultimate beneficial owners of any Eligible Shares held of record by Cede & Co. ("Cede"), provided that no Excluded Persons2 may be an Eligible Beneficial Holders, and (ii) Eligible Record Holders, the record holders of any Eligible Shares, other than Cede, provided that no Excluded Persons may be an Eligible Record Holder. "Eligible Shares" means the shares of NGM common stock held at the April 5, 2024 Closing of the Transaction that dissented or were exchanged for $1.55 per share in cash (the "Transaction Consideration"). Pursuant to the proposed Plan of Allocation, each Eligible Class Member will be eligible to receive a pro rata payment from the Net Settlement Fund equal to the product of (i) the number of Eligible Shares held by the Eligible Class Member and (ii) the "Per-Share Recovery" for the Settlement, which will be determined by dividing the total amount of the Net Settlement Fund by the total number of Eligible Shares held by all Eligible Class Members. As explained in further detail in the Notice, pursuant to the Plan of Allocation, payments from the Net Settlement Fund to Eligible Class Members will be made in the same manner in which Eligible Class Members received the Transaction Consideration. Eligible Class Members do not have to submit a claim form to receive a payment from the Net Settlement Fund. Any objections to the proposed Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, or Plaintiff's Counsel's application for a Fee and Expense Award, including Plaintiff's application for an Incentive Award, in connection with the Settlement must be filed with the Register in Chancery in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and delivered to Plaintiff's Counsel and Defendants' Counsel such that they are received no later than October 7, 2025, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice. Please do not contact the Court or the Office of the Register in Chancery regarding this notice. All questions about this notice, the proposed Settlement, or your eligibility to participate in the Settlement should be directed to the Administrator or Plaintiff's Counsel. Requests for the Notice should be made to the Administrator: NGM Stockholder Litigation Settlement Administrator c/o A.B. Data, Ltd. P.O. Box 170500 Milwaukee, Wi 53217 Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice, should be made to Plaintiff's Counsel: Joel A. Fleming, Esq. Equity Litigation Group LLP 1 Washington Mall #1307 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 468-8602 jfleming@equitylitigation.com Dated: August 22, 2025 BY ORDER OF THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Certain persons and entities are excluded from the Class by definition, as set forth in the full Notice of Pendency of Stockholder Class Action and Proposed Settlement, Settlement Hearing, and Right to Appear (the "Notice"), available at www.ngmstockholderlitigationsettlement.com. Any capitalized terms used in this Summary Notice that are not otherwise defined in this Summary Notice shall have the meanings given to them in the Notice. "Excluded Persons" means the persons and entities that Defendants will identify to be excluded from the Class by definition, in accordance with paragraph I.1(o) of the Stipulation. COMPUTER HAUS: Seeks Reconsideration of Class Certification Order ----------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as SHAILESH JAHAGIRDAR, et. at, v. THE COMPUTER HAUS, INC., et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00033-MOC-WCM (W.D.N.C.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order granting their motion to reconsider its class certification order and grant other appropriate relief. Computer is engaged in the retail sale of computers, and computer peripheral equipment. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=QloZgW at no extra charge.[CC] The Defendants are represented by: Nathan A. White, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF NATHAN A. WHITE PLLC Charlotte, NC 28266 Telephone: (704) 492-6574 E-mail: lawofficesofnathanawhite@gmail.com CONTINENTAL TIRE: Slattery Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime ---------------------------------------------------------- Tony Slattery, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CONTINENTAL TIRE THE AMERICAS, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, Case No. 5:25-cv-01923 (N.D. Ohio, Sept. 11, 2025), is brought to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorney's fees, costs, and other relief as appropriate under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). The Plaintiff's most recent rate of pay was $34.47. In addition to the base rate of pay, Defendant incorporated various types of routine and non-discretionary pay into its compensation structure. For example, Defendant provided Plaintiff and others with Annual Bonus pay (ValShar) and Performance Bonus (PayPerf) pay (collectively "bonus pay"). Throughout Plaintiff's employment with Defendant, Defendant failed to properly calculate Plaintiff's bonus pay and other non-discretionary remuneration in the regular rate for proper overtime rate calculation. Throughout Plaintiff's employment with Defendant, he earned bonus pay and other non-discretionary remuneration. As non-exempt employees, Defendant's Hourly Employees were entitled to full compensation for all overtime hours worked at a rate of 1.5 times their "regular rate" of pay, says the complaint. The Plaintiff was employed by Defendant from December 2017 through August 2025 as a non-exempt, hourly employee. The Defendant has its office location in Fairlawn, Ohio, and employs thousands of hourly employees in numerous states throughout the United States.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Matthew L. Turner, Esq. SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. One Town Square, 17th Floor Southfield, MI 48076 Phone: (248) 355-0300 Email: mturner@sommerspc.com CONTRACTORS CAREER CENTERS: Vakil Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. --------------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Contractors Career Centers, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Amar M. Vakil, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. Contractors Career Centers, Inc. d/b/a Contractor State License Schools a California nonprofit corporation, Case No. 25STCV26592 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., Sept. 9, 2025). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." Contractors Career Centers Inc is a California-based provider of training for examination preparations, education, and business solutions.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Alvin B. Lindsay, Esq. D.LAW, INC. 450 N. Brand Blvd. Suite 840 Glendale, CA 91203 Phone: (818) 962-6465 Fax: (818) 962-6469 Email: alindsay@d.law CREDIT SUISSE: $115MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 17 ------------------------------------------------------------- SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, derivatively as a shareholder of CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG on behalf of CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG, Plaintiff, v. URS ROHNER, et al., Defendants, and CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG, Nominal Defendant. Index No. 651657/2022 Hon. Andrea Masley SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION EXHIBIT C TO: ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES WHO OR WHICH HELD SHARES OF UBS GROUP AG ("UBS") (AS SUCCESSOR TO CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG ("CREDIT SUISSE"), AND TOGETHER WITH ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THE "COMPANY") COMMON STOCK AS OF THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON AUGUST 22, 2025 ("CURRENT UBS STOCKHOLDERS"). PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE ACTION AND THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the "Court"), of the pendency of the stockholder derivative action captioned Employees Retirement System for the City of Providence v. Rohner, et al., Index No. 651657/2022 (the "Action"). YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that the Parties have reached a proposed settlement of the Action (the "Settlement"), subject to the approval of the Court, as provided in a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, Compromise, and Release dated August 21, 2025 (the "Stipulation"). Under the terms of the proposed Settlement, UBS will receive $115,000,000 (United States Dollars), together with any interest earned on the payment and less any deductions for attorneys' fees and expenses for Plaintiff's Counsel and any applicable taxes and tax expenses. A more detailed description of the Settlement terms, as well as a description of the history of the Action and an explanation of stockholders' legal rights with respect to the Settlement, is provided in the full printed Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Stockholder Derivative Action (the "Notice"). The Notice and the Stipulation are publicly available on the "Investor Relations" section of UBS's website, https://www.ubs.com/global/en/investor-relations.html, and on Plaintiff's Counsel's website, www.blbglaw.com. Absent further order of the Court, a hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") will be held before the Honorable Andrea Masley on October 17, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., at the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, 60 Centre Street, Courtroom 242, New York, New York 10007. At the Settlement Hearing, the Court will, among other things: (i) determine whether Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel have adequately represented the interests of the Company and its stockholders; (ii) determine whether the proposed Settlement on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Company and its stockholders, and should be approved by the Court; (iii) determine whether a Judgment (substantially in the form attached as Exhibit D to the Stipulation) approving the Settlement, dismissing the Action with prejudice, and granting the Releases provided under the Stipulation should be entered; (iv) consider Plaintiff's Counsel's Fee and Expense Application, including any Service Award to Plaintiff; (v) consider any objections to the Settlement or the Fee and Expense Application; and (vi) consider any other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in connection with the Settlement. The Settlement Hearing may be adjourned by the Court without further written notice to Company stockholders. In addition, the Court may decide to conduct the Settlement Hearing remotely by telephone or videoconference, or otherwise allow Current UBS Stockholders to appear at the hearing remotely by phone or video, without further written notice to Company stockholders. You should monitor the Court's docket and/or the website of Plaintiff's Counsel, www.blbglaw.com, for any change in date, time, or format of the hearing. If you are a Current UBS Stockholder who or which continues to own shares of UBS common stock as of October 17, 2025, the date of the Settlement Hearing, you have the right to object to the proposed Settlement and/or the Fee and Expense Application, including Plaintiff's application for a Service Award, in writing, and you also have the right to appear at the Settlement Hearing. Any objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk of the Court and delivered to Counsel for Plaintiff and Counsel for the Company such that they are received no later than September 26, 2025, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice. Please Note: Because the Action was brought as a derivative action, which means that the Action was brought by Plaintiff on behalf of and for the benefit of Credit Suisse, the cash recovery from the Settlement will go to UBS, as successor to Credit Suisse. Individual stockholders will not receive any direct payment from the Settlement. Also, please note that there is no proof of claim form for stockholders to submit in connection with this Settlement, and stockholders are not required to take any action in response to this notice. DO NOT CALL OR WRITE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE All questions regarding this notice and the Settlement should be made to Plaintiff's Counsel: Jeroen van Kwawegen Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 Telephone: 800-380-8496 Email: settlements@blbglaw.com BY ORDER OF THE COURT CRST INTERNATIONAL: Cheatham Seeks Conditional Class Certification ------------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as CHRISTOPHER CHEATHAM, on behalf of him-self and all others similarly situated, V. CRST INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC and CRST EXPEDITED, INC, d/b/a CRST THE TRANSPORTATION SOLUTION, INC, Case No. 1:24-cv-00109-CJW-MAR (N.D. Iowa), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order granting conditional collective action class certification of this Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") claim, and authorization and facilitation of notice to the following putative collection action class members regarding their potential FLSA minimum wage and overtime claims: "All employee drivers who signed the Repayment Agreement and drove for CRST at any time between March 28, 2022, and [the date of this Order]." The Plaintiff also moves the Court for an Order approving and authorizing Plaintiff to hire a Third-Party Administrator to disseminate the proposed notice documents, including "Notice of Pending Collective Action Lawsuit. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act," "Consent to Join Lawsuit Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. section 216(b)," and "Reminder Card." CRST provides transportation services. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=1oF4bt at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Rachel Mariner, Esq. Robert Montez, Esq. RAFII & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 1120 N. Town Center Dr., Suite 130 Las Vegas, NV 89144 Telephone: (725) 245-6056 E-mail: rachel@rafiilaw.com robert@rafiilaw.com - and - Nathan Willems, Esq. Emily Shott Hood, Esq. RUSH & NICHOLSON, P.L.C. 115 First Avenue SE, Suite 201 Cedar Rapids, IA 52406-0637 Telephone: (319) 363-5209 Facsimile: (319) 363-6664 E-mail: nate@rushnicholson.com emily@rushnicholson.com The Defendant is represented by: James H. Hanson, Esq. Angela S. Cash, Esq. Andrew J. Ireland, Esq. SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, P.C. 10 West Market Street, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Telephone: (317) 492-9205 Facsimile: (317) 684-2414 E-mail: jhanson@scopelitis.com acash@scopelitis.com aireland@scopelitis.com - and - Thomas Wolle, Esq. SIMMONS PERRINE MOYER BERGMAN PLC 115 3rd Street SE, Suite 1200 Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 Telephone: (319) 896-4007 E-mail: twolle@simmonsperrine.com DANIEL GRYFE: Kolotkin Sues Over Untimely Paid Wages ---------------------------------------------------- David Kolotkin, and Bryan Camacho, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. DANIEL GRYFE, and DENA GRYFE, Case No. 1:25-cv-07567 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 11, 2025), is brought against the Defendants' violation the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and New York State Labor Law ("NYLL") as a result of untimely paid wages. For several years, Defendants engaged Plaintiffs to work at their home as a private chef and server who prepared and served food for Defendants' weekly private family gatherings and holiday meals. The Defendants often paid Plaintiffs for their services in an untimely manner or not at all. The Defendants also required Plaintiffs to lay money out of their own pockets in order to perform their services for Defendants without reimbursing Plaintiffs for those monies. Defendants did not require Plaintiffs to fill out any hiring paperwork or tax forms, nor did they provide them with a Wage Notice and Acknowledgement as required by NYLL, says the complaint. The Plaintiff worked for the Defendants as a private chef and server. The Defendants employed Plaintiffs out of their home located in New York City.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Eric S. Tilton, Esq. TILTON BELDNER, LLP 626 RXR Plaza Uniondale, NY 11556 Phone: (631) 629-5291 Facsimile: (516) 324-2170 Email: etilton@tiltonbeldner.com DEFIANT DREAM: Mcgettigan Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Defiant Dream, LLC. The case is styled as Shir Keidan Mcgettigan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Defiant Dream, LLC doing business as: Massageluxe, Case No. 0:25-cv-61830-XXXX (S.D. Fla., Sept. 11, 2025). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Defiant Dream, LLC doing business as MassageLuXe -- https://massageluxe.com/ -- is a spa like no other, offering therapeutic massages, luxurious facials, and waxing services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Andrew John Shamis, Esq. SHAMIS & GENTILE PA 14 NE 1st Ave., Ste. 705 Miami, FL 33132 Phone: (305) 479-2299 Fax: (786) 623-0915 Email: ashamis@shamisgentile.com DELTA AIR: Goodyear Allowed to File Exhibits Under Seal ------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as LUKAS GOODYEAR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Case No. 1:23-cv-05712-TWT (N.D. Ga.), the Hon. Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. entered an order granting the Plaintiff's motion to seal. The Plaintiff shall file the following documents under seal in connection with Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification: -- Exhibit 19, DELTA_LG_00001354 -- Exhibit 29, DELTA_LG_00015758 -- Exhibit 30, DELTA_LG_00010061 -- Exhibit 32, DELTA_LG_00005763 -- Exhibit 33, DELTA_LG_00016707 Delta is a major airline in the United States. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=joaKXF at no extra charge.[CC] DERMARITE INDUSTRIES: Fenton Files Suit in W.D. Pennsylvania ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Dermarite Industries, LLC. The case is styled as Heidi Fenton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Dermarite Industries, LLC, Case No. 1:25-cv-00282-SPB (W.D. Pa., Sept. 11, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud. DermaRite -- https://dermarite.com/ -- manufactures high quality skin care, advanced wound care & nutritional supplements for healthcare and senior-care facilities.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Charles E. Schaffer, Esq. LEVIN SEDRAN & BERMAN 510 Walnut Street, Ste. 500 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Phone: (215) 592-1500 Fax: (215) 592-4663 Email: cschaffer@lfsblaw.com DEVELOPMENT DIMENSIONS: Rounds Sues Over California Trap Breach --------------------------------------------------------------- Travis Rounds, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. DEVELOPMENT DIMENSIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Case No. 8:25-cv-01975-DOC-ADS (C.D. Cal., Aug. 28, 2025), is brought against the Defendant's violation of the California Trap and Trace Law as a result of the Defendant's installation and use of data broker software without obtaining consent. The Defendant uses data broker software on its website--https://www.ddiworld.com/ (the "Website")--to secretly collect data about Website visitors' computer, location, and browsing habits. The data broker software then compiles this data and correlates that data with extensive external records it already has about most Californians in order to learn the identity of the Website user, says the complaint. The Plaintiff visited the Website on May 1, 2025. The Defendant maintains ongoing commercial relationships with California customers.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Robert Tauler, Esq. J. Evan Shapiro, Esq. TAULER SMITH LLP 626 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 550 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (213) 927-9270 Email: rtauler@taulersmith.com eshapiro@taulersmith.com DIYCOSTSEG LLC: Raslavich Suit Removed to M.D. Florida ------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Benjamin Raslavich, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. DIYCOSTSEG LLC, Case No. 25-CA-007494 was removed from the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Hillsborough County, to the United States District Court for Middle District of Florida on Sept. 11, 2025, and assigned Case No. 8:25-cv-02446-MSS-LSG. The Complaint sets forth one count for relief pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Steven Jacob Carroll, Esq. NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP 201 17th Street NW, Suite 1600 Atlanta, GA 30363 Phone: 404-322-6298 Email: jake.carroll@nelsonmullins.com - and - Patrick M. Hagen, Esq. NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP 215 South Monroe Street, Suite 400 Tallahassee, FL 32301 Phone: 850-907-2508 Email: patrick.hagen@nelsonmullins.com EARL'S RESTAURANT: Espinoza Sues Over Discriminative Website ------------------------------------------------------------ Alejandro Espinoza, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. EARL'S RESTAURANT (MIAMI WORLDCENTER, FL) INC., a Florida Profit Corporation D/B/A EARLS KITCHEN + BAR, Case No. 1:25-cv-24105-XXXX (S.D. Fla., Sept. 9, 2025), is brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), as a result of the Defendant's discriminative website. The Defendant was and still is an organization owning and operating the website located at https://earls.ca/. Since the website is open through the internet to the public as an extension of the retail stores, by this nexus the website is an intangible service, privilege and advantage of Defendant's brick and mortar locations, the Defendant has subjected itself and the associated website it created and maintains to the requirements of the ADA. The website also services Defendant's physical stores by providing information on its brand and other information that Defendant is interested in communicating to its customers about its physical locations. Although the Website appeared to have an "accessibility" statement displayed and an "accessibility" widget/plugin added, the "accessibility" statement and widget/plugin, when tested, still could not be effectively accessed by, and continued to be a barrier to, blind and visually disabled persons, including Plaintiff as a completely blind person. Plaintiff, although she attempted to access the statement, thus, was unable to receive any meaningful or prompt assistance through the "accessibility" statement and the widget/plugin to enable her to quickly, fully, and effectively navigate the Website, says the complaint. The Plaintiff uses the computer regularly, but due to his visual disability, Plaintiff cannot use his computer without the assistance of appropriate and available auxiliary aids, screen reader software, and other technology and assistance. EARLS KITCHEN, is a company that sells sushi, salads, soups, noodles, bowls, pizza, burgers, chicken, salmon, crab cakes, ribs, steaks, taco, desserts, benedicts, omelets, and drinks. There is a retail location in Miami-Dade County.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Diego German Mendez, Esq. MENDEZ LAW OFFICES, PLLC P.O. BOX 228630 Miami, FL 33172 Phone: 305.264.9090 Facsimile: 1-305.809.8474 Email: info@mendezlawoffices.com - and - Richard J. Adams, Esq. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 6500 Cowpen Road, Suite 101 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Phone: 786-290-1963 Facsimile: 305-824-3868 Email: radamslaw7@gmail.com EPISOURCE LLC: Dunlap Suit Removed to E.D. California ----------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Lowell Dunlap, Jr., Loleetia Harper, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. EPISOURCE, LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, Case No. 25STCV018214 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento, to the United States District Court for Eastern District of California on Sept. 10, 2025, and assigned Case No. 2:25-at-01211. The Plaintiffs assert claims under the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA); California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA); California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA); and California Unfair Competition Law (UCL).[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Vassi Iliadis, Esq. HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (310) 785-4600 Facsimile: (310) 785-4601 Email: vassi.iliadis@hoganlovells.com EQT CORP: $167.5MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 30 ---------------------------------------------------------- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re EQT Corporation Securities Litigation Case No. 2:19-cv-00754-RJC SUMMARY NOTICE OF (I) PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND LITIGATION EXPENSES TO: all persons and entities who: (i) purchased the common stock of EQT Corporation ("EQT") from June 19, 2017 through June 17, 2019 (the "Class Period"); (ii) held EQT shares as of the record date of September 25, 2017 and were entitled to vote with respect to EQT's acquisition (the "Acquisition") of Rice Energy Inc. ("Rice") at the November 9, 2017 special meeting of EQT shareholders; (iii) held Rice shares as of the record date of September 21, 2017 and were entitled to vote with respect to the Acquisition at the November 9, 2017 special meeting of Rice shareholders; and/or (iv) acquired the common stock of EQT in exchange for their shares of Rice common stock in connection with the Acquisition, and were damaged thereby (collectively, the "Class"): PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, that Lead Plaintiffs Government of Guam Retirement Fund, Eastern Atlantic States Carpenters Annuity Fund (f/k/a Northeast Carpenters Annuity Fund), and Eastern Atlantic States Carpenters Pension Fund (f/k/a Northeast Carpenters Pension Fund), and additional Plaintiff Cambridge Retirement System (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), on behalf of themselves and the Court-certified Class, have reached a proposed settlement of the securities class action (the "Action") for $167,500,000 in cash (the "Settlement"). If approved, the Settlement will resolve all claims in the Action. Defendants deny all allegations in the Action and deny any violations of the federal securities laws. A hearing will be held on October 30, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Robert J. Colville of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, either in person in Courtroom 8C of the Joseph F. Weis, Jr. U.S. Courthouse, 700 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, or by telephone or videoconference, to determine: (i) whether the proposed Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (ii) whether the Action should be dismissed with prejudice against Defendants, and the Releases specified and described in the Stipulation (and in the Settlement Notice) should be granted; (iii) whether the proposed Plan of Allocation should be approved as fair and reasonable; and (iv) whether Lead Counsel's motion for attorneys' fees and litigation expenses should be approved. You do NOT need to attend the Settlement Hearing to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund. If you are a member of the Class, your rights will be affected by the pending Action and the Settlement, and you may be entitled to share in the Net Settlement Fund. If you have not yet received the Settlement Notice and the Proof of Claim and Release Form ("Claim Form"), you may obtain copies of these documents by contacting the Claims Administrator at: EQT Securities Litigation, c/o A.B. Data, Ltd., P.O. Box 173068, Milwaukee, WI 53217; (877) 388-1761; info@EQTSecuritiesLitigation.com. Copies of the Settlement Notice and Claim Form can also be downloaded from the case website, www.EQTSecuritiesLitigation.com. If you are a member of the Class, in order to be eligible to receive a payment from the Settlement, you must submit a Claim Form postmarked (if mailed) or online by no later than December 10, 2025. To submit a claim online, visit www.EQTSecuritiesLitigation.com. If you are a Class Member and do not submit a proper Claim Form, you will not be eligible to receive payment from the Settlement, but you will nevertheless be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court in the Action. Any objections to the proposed Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel's motion for attorneys' fees and litigation expenses must be filed with the Court and delivered to Lead Counsel and Defendants' Counsel such that they are received no later than October 9, 2025, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Settlement Notice. Please do not contact the Court, the Office of the Clerk of the Court, Defendants, or their counsel regarding this notice. All questions about this notice, the proposed Settlement, or your eligibility to participate in the Settlement should be directed to the Claims Administrator or Lead Counsel. Requests for the Settlement Notice and Claim Form should be made to: EQT Securities Litigation c/o A.B. Data, Ltd. P.O. Box 173068 Milwaukee, WI 53217 (877) 388-1761 info@EQTSecuritiesLitigation.com www.EQTSecuritiesLitigation.com Inquiries, other than requests for the Settlement Notice and Claim Form, should be made to Lead Counsel: Adam H. Wierzbowski Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas, 44th Floor New York, NY 10020 (800) 380-8496 settlements@blbglaw.com Daniel S. Sommers S. Douglas Bunch Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC 1100 New York Avenue, N.W. East Tower, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 408-4600 dsommers@cohenmilstein.com dbunch@cohenmilstein.com By Order of the Court Certain persons and entities are excluded from the Class by definition or prior request, as set forth in the full Notice of (I) Proposed Class Action Settlement; (II) Settlement Hearing; and (III) Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Litigation Expenses (the "Settlement Notice"), available at www.EQTSecuritiesLitigation.com. "Defendants" are: EQT, Steven T. Schlotterbeck, Robert J. McNally, David L. Porges, David E. Schlosser, Jr., Jimmi Sue Smith, James E. Rohr, Vicky A. Bailey, Philip G. Behrman, Kenneth M. Burke, A. Bray Cary, Jr., Margaret K. Dorman, Lee T. Todd, Jr., Christine J. Toretti, Daniel J. Rice IV, and Robert F. Vagt. Other capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated June 25, 2025 ("Stipulation"). The Stipulation can be viewed at www.EQTSecuritiesLitigation.com EXPRESS IMAGING SERVICES: Cano Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Express Imaging Services, Inc. The case is styled as Jonathan Cano, individually, and on behalf of other similarly situated employees v. Express Imaging Services, Inc., Case No. 25STCV26499 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., Sept. 9, 2025). The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)." Express Imaging Services, Inc. -- https://www.expressimagingservices.com/ -- is a U.S.-based medical data acquisition and digital solutions company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Sage S. Stone, Esq. BLACKSTONE LAW PC 8383 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 745 Beverly Hills, CA 90211-2442 Phone: 310-622-4278 EYEDEAL PROPERTIES: Mackey Sues Over Disabled's Access to Property ------------------------------------------------------------------ KIRK MACKEY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. EYEDEAL PROPERTIES, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 4:25-cv-04306 (S.D. Tex., September 10, 2025) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act. According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its facilities to be fully accessible to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other persons with disabilities. The Defendant has continued to discriminate against people who are disabled in ways that block them from access and use of its properties and business. The Plaintiff and similarly situated disabled individuals encountered architectural barriers in common areas such parking and public restrooms. The Plaintiff and Class members seek injunctive relief to remove the existing architectural barriers to the physically disabled when such removal is readily achievable for the place of public accommodation. Eyedeal Properties, LLC is a commercial property owner and operator doing business in Texas. [BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Douglas S. Schapiro, Esq. THE SCHAPIRO LAW GROUP, P.L 7301-A W. Palmetto Park Rd., #100A Boca Raton, FL 33433 Telephone: (561) 807-7388 Email: schapiro@schapirolawgroup.com FCA US LLC: Shores-Gaston Suit Removed to N.D. Ohio --------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Renita Shores-Gaston, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate and Person of ANTONIO GASTON, deceased, and others similarly situated v. FCA US LLC d/b/a Stellantis North America, et al., Case No. CI2025-02941 was removed from the Common Pleas Court of Lucas County, to the United States District Court for Northern District of Ohio on Sept. 10, 2025, and assigned Case No. 3:25-cv-01903-JZ. The Plaintiffs allege an intentional tort. The Plaintiffs' further allege wrongful death, strict product liability and supplier liability against John Doe Defendants. The Plaintiffs seek compensatory and consequential damages of not less than $25,000, as well as punitive damages and other equitable relief.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Denise A. Dickerson, Esq. Timothy J. Murray, Esq. SUTTER O'CONNELL 3600 Erieview Tower 1301 E. 9th Street Cleveland, OH 44114 Phone: (216) 928-2200 Fax: (216) 928-4400 Email: ddickerson@sutter-law.com tmurray@sutter-law.com FCA US: Appeals Tossed Class Decertification Bid in Soares Suit --------------------------------------------------------------- FCA US LLC is taking a cross appeal from a court order denying its motion to decertify the class in the lawsuit entitled Mario Soares, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FCA US LLC, et al., Defendants, Case No. 1:20-cv-11810-ADB, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The complaint is brought against the Defendants for design, manufacturing, and distribution of vehicles with defective active head restraint (AHR). On Aug. 18, 2023, Plaintiff Soares filed a motion to modify class definition. On Sept. 1, 2023, Defendant FCA US LLC filed a motion to decertify the class. On Oct. 20, 2023, Judge Allison D. Burroughs denied the Defendant's motion to decertify class and granted in part and denied in part the Plaintiff's motion to modify class definition. The class definition shall be modified to: All persons in Massachusetts who currently own or lease a Class Vehicle manufactured by FCA or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates that is equipped with an AHR system and who have not received two free replacement AHRs under FCA US's extended warranty program after September 1, 2017. The Court finds that it is appropriate to apply the majority "substantially similar" test, and having previously held in certifying the class that Soares had "presented sufficient evidence that the AHR system and design was uniform across all Class Vehicles, regardless of how the defect manifested," the Court finds substantial similarity between the vehicle Soares owned and the other Class Vehicles for purposes of standing. The Plaintiff thus has standing to bring claims based on Class Vehicles he did not buy or lease but which had AHR systems identical to his at the time the vehicle was leased or purchased. The Court otherwise finds that the modified class definition meets the requirements of numerosity, commonality, typicality, adequacy, predominance, and superiority for the reasons stated in the Court's class certification order. The appellate case is entitled Soares v. FCA US LLC, Case No. 25-1859, in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, filed on September 9, 2025. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellees MARIO SOARES, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, are represented by: Ian J. Barlow, Esq. Stuart C. Talley, Esq. KERSHAW COOK & TALLEY PC 401 Watt Ave. Sacramento, CA 95864 Telephone: (916) 779-7000 - and - Paula S. Bliss, Esq. Kimberly A. Dougherty, Esq. Kelly Anne Guagenty, Esq. JUSTICE LAW COLLABORATIVE, LLC 210 Washington St. North Easton, MA 02356 Telephone: (508) 230-2700 - and - Kenneth S. Byrd, Esq. Mark P. Chalos, Esq. Christopher E. Coleman, Esq. Amelia A. Haselkorn, Esq. LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP 222 2nd Ave S., Ste. 1640 Nashville, TN 37201 Telephone: (615) 313-9000 Defendant-Appellant FCA US LLC is represented by: Brandon L. Boxler, Esq. KLEIN THOMAS LEE & FRESARD 1051 E. Cary St., Ste. 1430 Richmond, VA 23219 Telephone: (703) 621-2109 - and - Peter M. Durney, Esq. Patricia Anne Hartnett, Esq. James Paul Kerr, Esq. SMITH DUGGAN CORNELL & GOLLUB LLP 101 Arch St., Ste. 1100 Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 482-8100 - and - Ian K. Edwards, Esq. Fred J. Fresard, Esq. KLEIN THOMAS & LEE LLC 101 W. Big Beaver, Ste. 1400 Troy, MI 48084 Telephone: (248) 509-9271 (248) 840-6314 FOOTHILL HOUSE: Hannan Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ---------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Foothill House Of Hospitality. The case is styled as Amy Nicole Hannan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Foothill House Of Hospitality, Case No. CU0002331 (Cal. Super. Ct., Nevada Cty., Sept. 10, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. Foothill House of Hospitality brings homeless people in Nevada County into a circle of community caring that offers shelter, sustenance, medical care, advocacy, opportunity, dignity, and hope as they assist them in transitioning from homelessness.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Manny Starr, Esq. FRONTIER LAW CENTER 6200 Canoga Avenue, #470 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Phone: 818-914-3433 Fax: 818-914-3433 Email: manny@frontierlawcenter.com FPG LABS: Court Dismisses Klosowski Class Action ------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as RACHEL KLOSOWSKI, et al., v. FPG LABS, LLC d/b/a OVATION FERTILITY, US GENETIC LAB, LLC d/b/a OVATION GENETICS, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-01210-MN (D. Del.), the Hon. Judge Noreika grants without prejudice the Defendants' motions to dismiss the Class Action Complaint. Pursuant to their request, the Plaintiffs may attempt to replead. An appropriate order will follow, the Court says. Accordingly, the Court finds that the Plaintiffs have failed to adequately allege Article III standing and will grant the motion to dismiss on that basis. The Plaintiffs initiated this action on Oct. 31, 2024, asserting 13 claims for violations of state consumer protection statutes, common law fraud, breach of warranty, and unjust enrichment. On Jan. 6, 2025, the Defendants moved to dismiss for lack of standing and failure to state a claim. The Plaintiffs claim they suffered economic losses after buying PGT-A testing from Defendants based on "false, deceptive, unfair, and misleading advertising, marketing, and/or promotion" between November 2020 and October 2023. They bring this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and all persons in the United States who have purchased PGT-A testing from Defendants, and seek to represent a nationwide class and five state subclasses from California, Louisiana, Nevada, North Carolina, and Texas. Ovation specializes in comprehensive fertility diagnostic services. A copy of the Court's memorandum dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=HPJN86 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Russell D. Paul, Esq. Shanon J. Carson, Esq. Zoe Seaman-Grant, Esq. BERGER MONTAGUE PC Wilmington, DE - and - Allison S. Freeman, Esq. CONSTABLE LAW P.A. 139 6th Ave S Safety Harbor, FL 34695 - and - Paula S. Bliss, Esq. JUSTICE LAW COLLABORATIVE LLC No. Easton, MA The Defendants are represented by: Ethan H. Townsend, Esq. Anna Fosberg Martin, Esq. Daniel R. Campbell, Esq. Brigid McCarthy, Esq. Chelsea Mounayer, Esq. MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP Wilmington, DE FPI MANAGEMENT: Data Breach Class Settlement Offers Cash Payments ----------------------------------------------------------------- Chloe Gocher of ClassAction.org reports that a class action settlement will end litigation against FPI Management over an August 2020 data breach that may have exposed the personal information of more than 21,000 people. The FPI Management class action settlement received preliminary approval from the court on July 9, 2025 and covers all of the approximately 21,417 United States residents who were notified that their personal information may have been affected by the data breach that was discovered by FPI Management around August 14, 2020. The court-approved website for the FPI Management settlement can be found at FPIDataIncident.com. FPI Management settlement class members who submit a timely, valid claim form will be able to receive a cash payment of $100 for consumers to whom a notice was mailed to a California address, two years of identity theft protection and credit monitoring, ordinary expense reimbursement of up to $400 and extraordinary expense reimbursement for up to $4,250. The class action settlement website defines "ordinary expenses" as documented costs or time losses directly caused by or related to the FPI Management data breach and its effects, including: -- Costs of accessing, freezing or unfreezing credit reports with any credit reporting agency; -- Out-of-pocket expenses such as bank fees, accountant fees, attorney fees, cell phone charges (if charged by the minute), data charges (if charged by the amount of data used), long distance phone charges, gasoline for local travel, postage, copying, parking, notary, faxing or scanning; -- Fees for credit monitoring, credit reports or other identity theft insurance products purchased between August 14, 2020 and November 6, 2025; and -- Up to three hours of time spent dealing with the effects of the data breach, reimbursed at a rate of $20 per hour. Extraordinary expense reimbursement, the website states, is intended for class members who suffered actual identity theft that is fairly traceable to the FPI data breach and occurred between August 14, 2020 and November 6, 2025, and whose related losses have not already been covered or mitigated, and whose costs are not covered in the "ordinary expenses" category. Class members seeking reimbursement for ordinary or extraordinary expenses must submit documented proof for each loss they seek to claim, the settlement website says. The two-year identity theft protection and credit monitoring offered through the class action settlement includes $1,000,000 identity theft insurance with no deductible, credit monitoring from TransUnion and identity restoration and recovery services. To submit a claim form online, FPI Management settlement class members must visit this page and log in with the unique ID and PIN found in their copy of the settlement notice. Alternatively, a PDF of the claim form is available to print, fill out and mail back to the address listed on the form. All claim forms must be submitted online or postmarked no later than November 6, 2025. FPI Management has also agreed, as part of the settlement, to implement several enhancements to its data security systems and network. A hearing is scheduled for October 24, 2025 to determine whether the settlement will receive final approval from the court. Settlement benefits will begin to be distributed to class members only after final approval has been granted and any appeals have been resolved. The FPI Management class action lawsuit claimed that the property management firm failed to properly protect the personal data -- including names, dates of birth, addresses, driver's license numbers, passport numbers, tax ID numbers, Social Security numbers, digital signatures, payment card information, financial account information, online credentials and medical information -- of thousands of individuals from a data breach discovered on or around August 14, 2020. [GN] FUTURE MOTION INC: Milbeck Suit Transferred to N.D. California -------------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Billy Joe Milbeck, Lindsay Nicole Milbeck, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Future Motion, Inc., Case No. 0:25-cv-02925 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Sept. 9, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 5:25-cv-07651-BLF to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Personal Inj. Prod. Liability. Future Motion -- https://futuremotion.com/ -- is a pioneering company in the field of personal digital vehicles.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Adam John Kress, Esq. Anna Rick, Esq. Michael K. Johnson, Esq. JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1800 Saint Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (612) 436-1908 Fax: (612) 436-1801 Email: akress@johnsonbecker.com arick@johnsonbecker.com mjohnson@johnsonbecker.com The Defendants are represented by: Tammy Marie Reno, Esq. NILAN JOHNSON LEWIS PA 250 Marquette Avenue South, Suite 800 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone: (612) 305-7515 Email: treno@nilanjohnson.com GANNETT CO: Court Dismisses Bradley's Claims -------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as STEVEN BRADLEY, et al., V. GANNETT CO. INC., Case No. 1:23-cv-01100-RDA-WEF (E.D. Va.), the Hon. Judge Rossie Alston, Jr. entered an order that each of the Named Plaintiffs' claims of discrimination, with the exception of Plaintiff Barry, will be dismissed for failure to state a claim and that the class allegations will be stricken from the Second Amended Complaint based on their failure to facially establish the ascertainability of the Proposed Class and the commonality of issues presented by the Proposed Class. Moreover, because this is the Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint and because the Plaintiffs generally failed to materially alter their allegations in the face of the prior Memorandum Opinion and Order, it appears that permitting further amendment is futile and no further leave will be granted. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted in-part and denied-in-part. The motion is granted in all respects except with respect to the claims of Plaintiff Barry; and it is further ordered that claims of Plaintiffs Bradley, Crane, Hiles, and Augsdorfer are dismissed. The Proposed Class consists of "All individuals who were subject to defendant's [sic] Reverse Race Discrimination Policy described below and who 1) either work or worked for Gannett based on any form of contractual relationship 2) [sic] or were considered by Gannett to be placed into a position to perform work for the Defendant based on any form of contractual relationship. The Defendant is a mass media holding company. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=wAr6i7 at no extra charge.[CC] GEN DIGITAL INC: Karwowski Data Privacy Row Dismissed ----------------------------------------------------- Gen Digital Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q report for the Quarterly Period Ended July 4, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in August 13, 2025, that with regards to a December 12, 2022, putative class action, "Lau v. Gen Digital Inc. and Jumpshot Inc.," later restyled as "Karwowski v. Gen Digital Inc. et al.," filed in the Northern District of California alleging violations of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, California Invasion of Privacy Act, statutory larceny and unfair competition, claims were voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice. Judgment was entered by the Court on October 23, 2024. Gen Digital Inc. is a digital company that owns consumer brands including Norton, Avast, LifeLock, MoneyLion, and more as part of its portfolio of cyber safety. GRAF ACQUISITION: $4.75MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 7 ---------------------------------------------------------------- IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL BERGER, as Trustee for the Paul Berger Revocable Trust, Plaintiff, v. GRAF ACQUISITION LLC, JAMES A. GRAF, MICHAEL DEE, KEVIN STARKE, SABRINA MCKEE, KEITH ABELL, and JULIE LEVENSON, Defendants. C.A. No. 2023-0873-LWW SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF STOCKHOLDER CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR TO: All holders of Graf Industrial Corp. ("Graf Industrial") common stock, whether beneficial or of record, as of the effective time of the acquisition of legacy Velodyne Lidar, Inc. ("Legacy Velodyne") by Graf Industrial on September 29, 2020 (the "Effective Time") (the "Settlement Class"). Certain persons and entities are excluded from the Settlement Class by definition, as set forth in the full Notice of Pendency of Stockholder Class Action and Proposed Settlement, Settlement Hearing, and Right to Appear (the "Notice"), available at www.VelodyneSettlement.com. Any capitalized terms used in this Summary Notice that are not otherwise defined in this Summary Notice shall have the meanings given to them in the Notice. PLEASE READ THIS SUMMARY NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the "Court"), that the stockholder class action (the "Action") has been preliminarily certified as a class action on behalf of the Settlement Class. YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that (i) Plaintiff Paul Berger, as Trustee for the Paul Berger Revocable Trust ("Plaintiff"), on behalf of himself and the other members of the Settlement Class; and (ii) Defendants James A. Graf, Michael Dee, Kevin Starke, Sabrina McKee, Keith Abell, and Julie Levenson (the "Individual Defendants") and Graf Acquisition LLC ("Graf Acquisition" and, together with the Individual Defendants, "Defendants") (Plaintiff and Defendants, together, the "Parties") have reached a proposed settlement of the Action for $4,750,000.00 in cash (the "Settlement"). The terms of the Settlement are stated in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, Compromise, and Release dated June 4, 2025 (the "Stipulation"), a copy of which is available at www.VelodyneSettlement.com. If approved by the Court, the Settlement will resolve all claims in the Action as against Defendants. A hearing (the "Settlement Hearing") will be held on October 7, 2025 at 1:30 p.m., before The Honorable Lori W. Will, Vice Chancellor, either in person at the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, New Castle County, Leonard L. Williams Justice Center, 500 North King Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, or remotely by telephone or videoconference (in the discretion of the Court), to, among other things: (i) determine whether to finally certify the Settlement Class for settlement purposes only, pursuant to Court of Chancery Rules 23(a), 23(b)(1), and 23(b)(2); (ii) determine whether Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel have adequately represented the Settlement Class, and whether they should be finally appointed as Class Representative and Class Counsel, respectively, for the Settlement Class; (iii) determine whether the proposed Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate to, and in the best interests of, Plaintiff and the other members of the Settlement Class; (iv) determine whether the proposed Final Order and Judgment approving the Settlement, dismissing the Action with prejudice, and granting the Releases provided under the Stipulation should be entered; (v) determine whether the proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund is fair and reasonable, and should therefore be approved; (vi) determine whether and in what amount any Fee and Expense Award should be paid out of the Settlement Fund, including any Incentive Award to Plaintiff to be paid solely out of the Fee and Expense Award; (vii) hear and rule on any objections to the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and/or Plaintiff's Counsel's application for a Fee and Expense Award, including Plaintiff's application for an Incentive Award to be paid solely out of the Fee and Expense Award; and (viii) consider any other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in connection with the Settlement. Any updates regarding the Settlement Hearing, including any changes to the date or time of the hearing or updates regarding in-person or remote appearances at the hearing, will be posted to the Settlement website, www.VelodyneSettlement.com. If you are a member of the Settlement Class, your rights will be affected by the pending Action and the Settlement, and you may be entitled to share in the Net Settlement Fund. If you have not yet received the Notice, you may obtain a copy of the Notice by contacting the Settlement Administrator at Velodyne Settlement, c/o A.B. Data, Ltd., P.O. Box 170500 or 877-884-1057. A copy of the Notice can also be downloaded from the Settlement website, www.VelodyneSettlement.com. If the Settlement is approved by the Court and the Effective Date occurs, the Net Settlement Fund will be distributed on a pro rata basis to Eligible Class Members in accordance with the proposed Plan of Allocation stated in the Notice or such other plan of allocation as is approved by the Court. Under the proposed Plan of Allocation, each Eligible Class Member will be eligible to receive a pro rata payment from the Net Settlement Fund equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of Graf Industrial common stock held as of the Effective Time of the Merger on September 29, 2020, excluding those shares held by the Excluded Stockholders and Redeeming Stockholders ("Eligible Shares") and (ii) the "Per-Share Recovery" for the Settlement, which will be determined by dividing the total amount of the Net Settlement Fund by the total number of Eligible Shares held by all Eligible Class Members. As explained in further detail in the Notice, Eligible Class Members do not have to submit a claim form to receive a payment from the Net Settlement Fund. Any objections to the proposed Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, or Plaintiff's Counsel's Fee and Expense Application, including Plaintiff's application for an Incentive Award, must be filed with the Register in Chancery in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and delivered to Plaintiff's Counsel and Defendants' Counsel such that they are received no later than September 22, 2025, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice. Please do not contact the Court or the Office of the Register in Chancery regarding this Summary Notice. All questions about this Summary Notice, the proposed Settlement, or your eligibility to participate in the Settlement should be directed to the Settlement Administrator or Plaintiff's Counsel. Requests for the Notice should be made to the Settlement Administrator: Velodyne Settlement c/o A.B. Data, Ltd. P.O. Box 170500 Milwaukee, WI 53217 Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice, should be made to Plaintiff's Counsel: Kimberly A. Evans BLOCK & LEVITON LLP 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1120 Wilmington, DE 19801 kim@blockleviton.com Dated: August 8, 2025 BY ORDER OF THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GRUMA CORPORATION: Gomez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against Gruma Corporation, et al. The case is styled as Jorge Nava Gomez, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Gruma Corporation, Hitzayala Hernandez, an individual, Does 1 through 100, Case No. 25CV140153 (Cal. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty., Aug. 29, 2025). GRUMA -- https://www.gruma.com/en -- is one of the leading corn flour and tortilla producers, serving industrial, retail, and foodservice customers.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Calyn V. Hadlock, Esq. BIBIYAN LAW GROUP, P.C. 1460 Westwood Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90024 Phone: (310) 438-5555 Fax: (310) 300-1705 Email: calyn@tomorrowlaw.com HAYDON CORPORATION: Autra Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Haydon Corporation. The case is styled as James Autra, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Haydon Corporation, Case No. STK-CV-UOE-2025-0012950 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., Sept. 9, 2025). The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment." Haydon Corporation -- https://haydoncorp.com/ -- is a US-owned, US-based national manufacturer of high-quality metal framing, rooftop support, and baseboard heating systems.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kane Moon, Esq. MOON & YANG, APC 725 South Figueroa St., 31st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: 213-232-3128 Fax: 213-232-3125 Email: kane.moon@moonyanglaw.com HECTOR RIOS: Burk Loses Bid for Class Certification --------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as LESLIE ROBERT BURK, et al., v. HECTOR RIOS, et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-00199-LS (W.D. Tex.), the Hon. Judge Leon Schydlower entered an order denying the Petitioners' request for certification as a class pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. The Court further entered an order that Leslie Robert Burk, Andres Quevedo, Carlos Chavez, Anthony Rueda, Abel Gonzalez, Pu-Ruiz Bielman Alexander, Guillermo Galaz Reyes, Jesus Manuel Camarillo, and Rogelio Perez Figueroa's "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. section 2241" is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Petitioners claim that they were kept in cuffs, chains, and shackles "while inside a series of locked, overcrowded, and unsanitary holding cells" for two days during their transfer from the Otero County Prison Facility in Chaparral, New Mexico, to the El Paso County Jail in El Paso, Texas. They allege that some thirty people were held in an eight-person cell with the expectation they would sleep on the floor covered with feces and urine, the suit says A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=cjh5vB at no extra charge.[CC] HONDA MOTOR: Filing for Class Cert Bid Extended to Feb. 9, 2026 --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Spencer v. Honda Motor Corp., Ltd. et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-00988 (E.D. Cal., Filed June 2, 2021), the Hon. Judge Troy L. Nunley entered an order extending the deadline for Plaintiff to file his motion for class certification to Feb. 9, 2026. The nature of suit states Diversity-Product Liability. Honda is a Japanese multinational conglomerate automotive manufacturer.[CC] HOSPITAL SISTERS: Natalie Bid to Seal Class Cert Docs Tossed ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Brahm Natalie v. Hospital Sisters Health System, et al., Case No. 3:23-cv-00444 (W.D. Wisc., Filed July 5, 2023), the Hon. Judge William M. Conley entered an order denying the Plaintiffs motion to seal eight documents associated with their motion for class certification. The Plaintiffs contend that three of these documents contain protected health information, as defined in the protective order, and the documents bear confidential designations over this information. The other five documents were designated confidential by defendants under the same order. While plaintiffs apparently disagree with at least some of these designations, they have not sought relief from the court on this front. With a protective order in force in this case, the parties need not file separate motions to seal designated documents because the protective order already authorizes parties to file this type of material under seal. The Plaintiffs concede the material at-issue was designated under a previously entered protective order, so their motion to seal is unnecessary. For the avoidance of doubt: The material is under seal and will remain under seal pursuant to the protective order. The parties are reminded that they must work in good faith to resolve any disputes over designations and avoid court intervention if possible. They are also reminded that they should contemporaneously file public redacted versions with any sealed filings. The nature of suit states Torts -- Personal Property -- Other Fraud. Hospital is a multi-institutional health care system.[CC] ICF TECHNOLOGY: Nizeul Must File Class Cert Response by Sept. 25 ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Nizeul v. ICF Technology, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-01393 (D. Conn., Filed Aug. 29, 2024), the Hon. Judge Michael P. Shea entered an order that the Defendants shall respond to the Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification on or before Sept. 25, 2025. The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). ICF is a streaming and processing service provider.[CC] ILLINOIS: Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Response ----------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Heather Kainz, et al., on behalf of Themselves and a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, v. Illinois Department of Corrections, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01250-JEH-RLH (C.D. Ill.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order granting an extension of time, up to and including Oct. 3, 2025, to respond to the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification. The Defendants expect that a comprehensive response will require more time than previously granted by this Court on Aug. 6, 2025. On Sept. 2, 2025, counsel for Defendants contacted counsel for the Plaintiffs who advised they do not oppose the relief requested in this Motion. This Motion is brought in good faith and is not being made for the purposes of improper delay. On Nov. 23, 2021, the Plaintiffs filed a putative class action. On Aug. 6, 2025 the Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. Illinois operates 25 adult correctional centers as well as boot camps, work camps and adult transition centers. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=rSFf93 at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: M. Nieves Bolaños, Esq. Patrick Cowlin, Esq. HAWKS QUINDEL, S.C. 111 East Wacker Drive, Suite 2300 Chicago, IL 60601 E-mail: mnbolanos@hq-law.com pcowlin@hq-law.com - and - Patricia A. Stamler, Esq. Elizabeth C. Thomson, Esq. Matthew J. Turchyn, Esq. HERTZ SCHRAM PC 1760 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 300 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 E-mail: pstamler@hertzschram.com sweiss@hertzschram.com lthomson@hertzschram.com mturchyn@hertzschram.com - and - Martin A. Dolan, Esq. DOLAN LAW PC 10 South LaSalle Street #3702 Chicago, IL 60603 E-mail: mdolan@dolanlegal.com The Defendants are represented by: Robert T. Shannon, Esq. Mr. Ambrose V. McCall, Esq. HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 151 North Franklin Street, Suite 2500 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 704-3901 Facsimile: (312) 704-3001 E-mail: rshannon@hinshawlaw.com amccall@hinshawlaw.com - and - Denise Baker-Seal, Esq. Jessica Holliday, Esq. Kara Burke, Esq. BROWN & JAMES, P.C. Richland Plaza I 525 West Main Street, Suite 200 Belleville, IL 62220-1547 E-mail: dbaker-seal@bjpc.com jholliday@bjpc.com karab@bjpc.com - and - Michael A. Warner Jr., Esq. Hailey M. Golds, Esq. Reva G. Ghadge, Esq. FRANCZEK P.C. 300 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 3400 Chicago, IL 60604 E-mail: maw@franczek.com tlt@franczek.com hmg@franczek.com jvl@franczek.com rgg@franczek.com IRON CHEF HIBACHI: Liu FLSA Suit Transferred to S.D. New York ------------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Wen Lin Liu, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Iron Chef Hibachi & Asian Fusion Inc. doing business as: Iron Chef Hibachi & Asian Fusion doing business as: Iron Chef of Newburgh; Iron Chef Hibachi & Asian Fusion Inc. doing business as: Iron Chef & Sushi Fusion doing business as: Iron Chef of Central Valley; HIROSAKI, INC. doing business as: Iron Chef Hibachi & Asian Fusion doing business as: Iron Chef of Newburgh; Sakimura Hibachi & Asian Fusion Inc doing business as: Sakimura Hibachi and Asian Fusion doing business as: Sakimura Hibachi & Asian Fusion; GASHO 1 HIBACHI & ASIAN FUSION INC. doing business as: Iron Chef & Sushi Fusion, doing business as: Iron Chef of Central Valley; GASHO OF WOODBURY INC. doing business as: Iron Chef & Sushi Fusion, doing business as: Iron Chef of Central Valley; CHEN GROUP LLC doing business as: Iron Chef Hibachi & Asian Fusion doing business as: Iron Chef of Newburgh; CHEN GROUP 1059 LLC doing business as: Iron Chef Hibachi & Asian Fusion, doing business as: Iron Chef of Newburgh; XIANGZHEN CHEN, also known as: Xiang Zhen Chen, also known as: David Chen; Joyce Doe; Case No. 1:25-cv-04810 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Sept. 9, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 7:25-cv-07457-PMH to the proceeding. The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Iron Chef Hibachi & Sushi Fusion -- https://ironchefworld.com/ -- is a revitalized Japanese restaurant located in Central Valley, offering a blend of hibachi, sushi, and other Asian cuisine.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: John Troy, esq. TROY LAW, PLLC 41-25 Kissena Blvd., Suite 110 Flushing, NY 11355 Phone: (718) 762-2332 Email: johntroy@troypllc.com The Defendants are represented by: Darius A. Marzec, Esq. MARZEC LAW FIRM, P.C. 776A Manhattan Avenue, Suite 104 New York, NY 11222 Phone: (718) 609-0303 Email: dmarzec@marzeclaw.com ITHACA ENERGY: Alberta Court Approves Securities Class Settlement ----------------------------------------------------------------- A notice is directed to all persons and entities, excluding certain persons associated with the Defendants, wherever they may reside or be domiciled, who purchased or otherwise acquired Ithaca Energy Inc., now known as Ithaca Energy Limited ("Ithaca") common shares in the secondary market, on or after October 9, 2014, and held some or all of those securities until after the close of trading on February 24, 2015 ("Class Members" and the "Class"). PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE A class action brought on behalf of Class Members has been settled. The Settlement has been approved by the Alberta Court of King's Bench. This Notice provides Class Members with information about how to submit a Claim Form to the Administrator in order to participate in the distribution of the Net Settlement Amount. THE ACTION On May 26, 2015, a proposed class action was commenced on behalf of investors who purchased Ithaca common shares in the secondary market during the Class Period, against Ithaca in the Alberta Court of King's Bench: Stevens v. Ithaca Energy Inc. (now, Ithaca Energy Limited) Court File no. 1501-05830 (the "Action"). The Plaintiff in the Action alleges that the Defendants made misrepresentations during the Class Period related to Ithaca's offshore oil and gas business and operations concerning: (1) material modifications to its floating production facility, the FPF-1; and (2) corresponding 2015 pro forma production and revenue projections for the Greater Stella Area in the Central North Sea. Ithaca denies all such allegations. The settlement of the Action, without an admission of liability on the part of the Defendant, was approved by The Honourable Justice Neufeld on August 7, 2025. This notice provides a summary of the settlement. SUMMARY OF THE SETTLEMENT TERMS Ithaca's insurers will pay CAD $9 million (the "Settlement Amount"), in full and final settlement of all claims against Ithaca in the Action. Class Counsel Fees, including out-of-pocket expenses and taxes, were fixed by the Court as a first charge on the Settlement Amount in the amount of thirty (30) percent of CAD $9 million, plus disbursements, plus taxes. The settlement for the Class, less the Class Counsel Fees and disbursements, administrator's expenses, and taxes, will be distributed to the Class in accordance with the Court-approved Plan of Allocation. The Settlement Agreement and Plan of Allocation may be viewed at https://bergermontague.ca/cases/ithaca-energy-inc/ and https://jssbarristers.ca/class-actions/ithaca-energy-inc/. HOW TO MAKE A CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION: CLAIMS FOR COMPENSATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY Each Class Member must submit a completed Claim Form on or before January 5, 2026 in order to participate in the settlement. The Claim Form can be accessed or downloaded at https://bergermontague.ca/cases/ithaca-energy-inc/ or obtained by calling the Administrator at 647.598.8772 ext 2. If you do not submit a completed Claim Form by January 5, 2026, you will not receive any part of the Net Settlement Amount. The Court appointed Berger Montague (Canada) PC as the Administrator of the settlement to, among other things: (i) receive and process Claim Forms; (ii) decide eligibility for compensation; and (iii) distribute the net Settlement Amount to eligible Class Members. The Claim Form should be submitted to the Administrator by using the secure Online Claims System at https://bergermontague.ca/cases/ithaca-energy-inc/ and https://jssbarristers.ca/class-actions/ithaca-energy-inc/. You may submit a paper Claim Form only if you do not have internet access. The paper Claim Form may be sent by mail or courier to: Ithaca Administrator 330 Bay Street, Suite 505 Toronto, ON M5H 2S8 Email: info@bergermontague.ca QUESTIONS Questions for the Class Members' lawyers may be directed to: Berger Montague (Canada) PC 330 Bay Street, Suite 505 Toronto, ON M5H 2S8 Tel: (647) 598-8772 Email: info@bergermontague.ca JSS Barristers 304 8 Ave SW #800, Calgary, AB T2P 1C2 Tel: (403) 571-0747 Email: priceg@jssbarristers.ca [GN] JEOMILL REALTY CORP: Lopez Sues Over Unlawful Barriers ------------------------------------------------------ Daniel Lopez, and the others similarly situated v. JEOMILL REALTY CORP. and 1351 COLLINS RESTAURANT LLC, Case No. 1:25-cv-24114-XXXX (S.D. Fla., Sept. 9, 2025), is brought for injunctive relief pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (hereinafter, the "ADA"), and the ADA's Accessibility Guidelines (hereinafter, the "ADAAG") as a result of the unlawful barriers. The Plaintiff has visited the Subject Premises and intends to return to utilize the goods, services, and accommodations offered to the public. However, he is deterred from returning while the discriminatory barriers and non-compliant policies described herein persist. The Plaintiff has been denied full and equal access to the Subject Premises, preventing him from enjoying the goods and services offered therein. These denials are caused by the physical barriers, including those outlined in this Complaint, and will continue until the barriers are removed. The Plaintiff has suffered harm and injury as a result of personally encountering barriers to access at the Subject Premises, and she will continue to suffer harm due to the Defendants' failure to address the ADA violations described herein. The Plaintiff has experienced direct and indirect injury as a result of the physical barriers and ADA violations at the Subject Premises and the Defendants' actions or inactions in remedying these violations. The Plaintiff attempted to access the Subject Premises accompanied by her next friend but was unable to do so due to her disability and the existence of physical barriers, dangerous conditions, and ADA violations that restricted her access to the property and its accommodations, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a double-leg amputee from above the knee, which limits his major life activities including but not limited to walking, and requires the use of a wheelchair for mobility purposes. JEOMILL REALTY CORP., is a New York profit corporation which is authorized to and does transact business in the State of Florida and within this judicial district.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Lauren N. Wassenberg, Esq. LAUREN N. WASSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 33 SE 4th St., Ste. 100 Boca Raton, Florida 33432 Phone: 844-702-8867 Email: WassenbergL@gmail.com JETBLUE AIRWAYS: Parties Must Confer Class Cert Deadlines --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Acevedo v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, Case No. 6:25-cv-01689 (M.D. Fla., Filed Sept. 3, 2025), the Hon. Judge Paul G. Byron entered an order directing the parties to confer regarding deadlines pertinent to a motion for class certification and advise the Court of agreeable deadlines in their case management report. The deadlines should include a deadline for (1) disclosure of expert reports -- class action, plaintiff and defendant; (2) discovery -- class action; (3) motion for class certification; (4) response to motion for class certification; and (5) reply to motion for class certification. The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). JetBlue is an American low-cost airline.[CC] JUST ENERGY: $25MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Oct. 15 ---------------------------------------------------------- The Court-appointed representatives of a class of former shareholders of Just Energy Group Inc. have reached a settlement of the class action commenced following Just Energy's August 2019 restatement of its financial statements. Just Energy's insurers have agreed to pay US$25,000,000 to settle the claims made against Just Energy in the class action. In connection with the settlement, the action will be dismissed in its entirety. Just Energy does not admit any wrongdoing or liability. Ernst & Young LLP previously paid C$1,500,000 to settle the claims made against it in the class action. The Court approved the EY settlement on October 31, 2023. The Class is defined as all persons and entities, wherever they may reside or be domiciled, who: "acquired any Just Energy Securities during the Class Period and retained some or all of them at the close of trading on July 22, 2019, or August 14, 2019, other than Excluded Persons." In the above definition: "Class Period" means the period from May 16, 2018, to August 14, 2019 inclusive. "Excluded Persons" means (i) the Defendants; (ii) Just Energy's and Ernst & Young LLP's past and present subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, senior employees, partners, legal representatives, heirs, predecessors, successors and assigns; (iii) any member of the Individual Defendants' immediate families; and (iv) any entity in which the Individual Defendants have a controlling interest. "Securities" means: (i) common shares, previously listed for trading on the TSX and NYSE under the symbol "JE"; and (ii) 8.50% Series A preferred shares, previously listed for trading on the TSX under the symbol "JE.PR.U" and on the NYSE under the symbol "JE.PR.A". (the "Class" or the "Class Members") The class action was commenced following Just Energy's August 2019 restatement of its financial statements. The Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that during the Class Period Just Energy made misrepresentations by materially (i) overstating its Accounts Receivable; and (ii) understating its Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The settlement and dismissal of the action against Just Energy is subject to the approval of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. If approved by the Court, the settlement will settle, extinguish, and bar all claims of the Class against Just Energy relating in any way to or arising out of the proceeding. The settlement is a compromise of disputed claims. The class is represented by the law firms of Siskinds LLP, Berger Montague (Canada) PC, and The Rosen Law Firm. Class Counsel is seeking the approval of legal fees not to exceed 30% of the Settlement Amount under the settlement with Just Energy (i.e. US $7,500,000), plus disbursements and applicable taxes. At the hearing, Class Counsel will also seek payment of honoraria to the representative plaintiffs in the amount of C$5,000 each. A hearing to approve the settlement with Just Energy will be held on October 15, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. via remote video conference, during which the Court will consider whether the proposed settlement and Class Counsel's fees and disbursements are fair and reasonable and should be approved and consider a Plan of Allocation for the distribution of the net settlement funds. Class Members who wish to object to or comment on the settlement, Class Counsel's fee and disbursement request, or the Plan of Allocation should do so by no later than October 8, 2025. If the settlement is approved, all Class Members will be bound by it. For complete details regarding the proposed settlement, including how to object/comment, please consult the long-form notice available, in English and French, on Class Counsel's websites at https://bergermontague.ca/cases/just-energy-group/ and https://www.siskinds.com/class-action/just-energy/ Inquiries: BERGER MONTAGUE (CANADA) PC 330 Bay Street, Suite 505 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2S8 Tel: (647) 576-7840 Albert Pelletier apelletier@bergermontague.com Vincent DeMarco vdemarco@bergermontague.com KANDLELIGHT LLC: Brown Sues Over Discriminative Premises -------------------------------------------------------- Altaune Brown, and other similarly situated disabled individuals v. KANDLELIGHT LLC, and FRANK & WALTER EBERHART L.P. NO. 1, Case No. 1:25-cv-07482 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 9, 2025), is brought against the Defendants seeking equitable, injunctive, and declaratory relief; monetary and nominal damages; along with attorney9s fees, costs, and expenses pursuant to: Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), the New York City Human Rights Law ("NYCHRL"); and the New York State Human Rights Law ("NYSHRL") as a result of discrimination regarding the Defendants' Premises. On February 7, 2025, and other occasions, Plaintiff attempted to enter Defendants' Premises, which operates as an Indian deli and restaurant specializing in vegetarian and vegan dishes. Defendants' Premises is less than 1.2 miles from Plaintiff's home. The Plaintiff has since returned to Defendants' Premises because he is trying to eat mostly at vegan restaurants for health purposes and actively seeks vegan restaurants in his home neighborhood; however, the barriers that prevent access and restrict the paths of travel remain, and Plaintiff continues to be denied access and is deterred from returning based on his knowledge that the barriers exist. Accordingly, Plaintiff has and continues to suffer an injury in fact. The Defendants denying Plaintiff the opportunity to participate in and benefit from the services or accommodations offered within Defendants' Premises because of his disability has caused Plaintiff to suffer an injury in fact, says the complaint. The Plaintiff is a paraplegic who uses a wheelchair for mobility. Desi owns, leases, operates, maintains, and controls all, or the relevant portions, of Defendants' Premises.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Bradly G. Marks, Esq. THE MARKS LAW FIRM, PC 155 E 55th Street, Suite 4H New York, NY 10022 Phone: (646)770-3775 Fax: (646) 867-2639 Email: brad@markslawpc.com KIA AMERICA: Filing for Class Certification Bid Due June 1, 2026 ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Amy Doucette, et al, v. Kia America Inc. et al, Case No. 8:24-cv-00731-DMG-DFM (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Dolly Gee entered an order Amended pleadings and addition of Parties Oct. 17, 2025 cut-Off: Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off (includes Dec. 8, 2026 hearing of discovery motions): The Plaintiff's Class Certification Motion June 1, 2026 and Class Expert Reports: The Defendants' opposition to class cert. Aug. 17, 2026 and class expert reports: The Plaintiffs' reply in support of class Oct. 1, 2026 certification motion: Class certification motion hearing: Oct. 16, 2026 Kia provides a wide range of cars. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=M2uCo9 at no extra charge.[CC] LATCH INC: $1.95MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Dec. 9 --------------------------------------------------------- RG/2 Claims Administration LLC, as Claims Administrator, issued a release: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SCOTT SCHWARTZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. LATCH, INC., LUKE SCHOENFELDER, ROBERT J. SPEYER, PAUL A. GALIANO, JENNY WONG, JOSHUA KAZAM, JENNIFER RUBIO, NED SEGAL, MICHELANGELO VOLPI, PETER CAMPBELL, TRICIA HAN, RAJU RISHI, J. ALLEN SMITH, and ANDREW SUGRUE, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-00027-WCB CLASS ACTION SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES To: All persons and entities who or which were stockholders of pre-merger Latch, Inc. ("Legacy Latch") and purchased or otherwise acquired Latch, Inc. ("Latch" or the "Company") common stock pursuant to the registration statement filed in connection with Latch's June 4, 2021 merger with TS Innovation Acquisitions, Inc. ("TSIA") and were allegedly damaged thereby (the "Settlement Class"). YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, that the Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff, Scott Schwartz, on behalf of himself and all members of the Settlement Class, and Latch, Luke Schoenfelder, Robert J. Speyer, Paul A. Galiano, Jenny Wong, Joshua Kazam, Jennifer Rubio, Ned Segal, Michaelangelo Volpi, Peter Campbell, Tricia Han, Raju Rishi, J. Allen Smith, and Andrew Sugrue ("Individual Defendants" and, together with Latch, "Defendants" and, together with Lead Plaintiff, the "Parties"), have reached a proposed settlement of the claims in the class action (the "Action") in the amount of $1,950,000 (the "Settlement"). A hearing will be held before the Honorable William C. Bryson on December 9, 2025 at 10:00 a.m., via Zoom, where the Court will consider whether: (i) the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and should be finally approved; (ii) the Plan of Allocation is fair and reasonable, and should be approved; and (iii) Lead Counsel's application for attorneys' fees and expenses and Lead Plaintiff's service awards are reasonable and should be approved. The Court may change the date of the Settlement Hearing, or hold it telephonically or via videoconference, without providing another notice. You do NOT need to attend the Settlement Hearing to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A MONETARY PAYMENT. The Notice of Pendency of Class Action, Proposed Class Action Settlement, and Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses ("Notice") and Proof of Claim and Release form ("Claim Form") can be obtained by visiting the website of the Claims Administrator, www.rg2claims.com/LegacyLatch.html, calling the Claims Administrator toll free at 1-866-742-4955, emailing the Claims Administrator at info@rg2claims.com, or writing to the Claims Administrator at: Schwartz v. Latch, Inc., RG/2 Claims Administration, LLC, P.O. Box 59479, Philadelphia, PA 19102-9479. Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice/Claim Form or for information about the status of a claim, may also be made to Lead Counsel: FISHMAN HAYGOOD, L.L.P. Attn: Kaja S. Elmer 201 St. Charles Ave, 46th Floor New Orleans, LA 70170 www.fishmanhaygood.com Telephone: (504) 586-5252 If you are a Settlement Class Member, to be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must submit a Claim Form postmarked or submitted online no later than November 10, 2025. If you are a Settlement Class Member and do not timely submit a valid Claim Form, you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, but you will nevertheless be bound by all judgments or orders entered by the Court in the Action. If you are a Settlement Class Member and wish to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you must submit a written request for exclusion in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice such that it is received no later than November 9, 2025. If you validly exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you will not be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court in the Action, whether favorable or unfavorable, and you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund. Any objections to the proposed Settlement, Lead Counsel's application for attorneys' fees and expenses, and/or the proposed Plan of Allocation must be filed with the Court, either by mail or in person, and be mailed to counsel for the Parties in accordance with the instructions in the Notice, such that they are received no later than November 18, 2025. PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT, DEFENDANTS, OR DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL REGARDING THIS NOTICE. DATED: September 8, 2025 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LEO'S SF LLC: Rodas Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against LEO'S SF, LLC, et al. The case is styled as Zindy Adali Soc Rodas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. LEO'S SF, LLC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, Case No. CGC25628964 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., Sept. 10, 2025). The case type is stated as "Other Non-Exempt Complaints." Leo's Oyster Bar -- https://www.leossf.com/ -- is an award-winning 3-star cocktail bar and seafood focused restaurant in the heart of San Francisco's Financial District.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Daniel Ginzburg, Esq. FRONTIER LAW CENTER 23901 Calabasas Rd., Ste. 1084 Calabasas, CA 91302 Phone: (818) 914-3433 Fax: (818) 914-3433 Email: dan@frontierlawcenter.com LTF CLUB: Class Settlement in Turner Suit Gets Initial Nod ---------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as SAMUEL TURNER, v. LTF CLUB MANAGEMENT CO, LLC, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-00046-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge entered an order granting the Plaintiff's motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement: -- The Plaintiff's counsel, Edwin Aiwazian, Arby Aiwazian, and Joanna Ghosh of Lawyers for Justice, PC, and LippSmith LLP, are appointed as Class counsel for settlement purposes. -- The named plaintiff Samuel Turner is appointed as Class representative for settlement purposes. -- The proposed Class Notice is approved in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. -- The hearing for final approval of the proposed settlement is set for Monday, March 2, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. before the undersigned in Courtroom 4, with the motion for final approval of class action settlement to be filed at least 35 days in advance of the final approval hearing, in accordance with Local Rule 230(b). The requirements for preliminary certification under Rule 23 have been satisfied, and the court finds that conditional certification of the Class is appropriate. For settlement purposes, the parties request approval of the following class of an estimated 7,518 individuals (the "Class Members" or "Settlement Class"): "All current and former hourly-paid or non-exempt employees who worked for any of the Defendants within the State of California at any time during the Class Period," which extends from "Nov. 21, 2015, through the Preliminary Approval Date." Under the parties' Settlement Agreement, the Defendants will pay a maximum settlement amount ("MSA") of $1,250,000.00 allocated as follows: (1) up to $437,500 for attorneys' fees and up to $97,000 for plaintiff's counsel’s documented litigation costs; (2) a $10,000 incentive award for the named plaintiff; (3) $187,500 in civil PAGA penalties, with $140,625 of the penalties payable to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency ("LWDA"); and (4) up to $45,300 for settlement administration costs. LTF is in the business of operating health and athletic clubs. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Ovob1o at no extra charge.[CC] MAGIC MOUNTAIN: Winters Suit Removed to C.D. California ------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Charles Winters, individually, and on behalf of members of the general public and the putative class members similarly situated v. MAGIC MOUNTAIN, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No. 25STCV23183 was removed from the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on Sept. 5, 2025, and assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-08434. The Plaintiff alleges that he and others were not provided legally compliant meal and rest periods and not paid premium pay when they did not receive legally compliant meal and rest periods. The Plaintiff's fourth cause of action is for the alleged failure to pay minimum wages for all hours worked. The Plaintiff's seventh cause of action alleges "Defendants have intentionally and willfully failed to provide Plaintiff and the other class members with complete and accurate wage statements" because the wage statements given to them failed to "include the total number of hours worked by Plaintiff and the other class members." Plaintiff's fifth cause of action is a derivative claim for waiting time penalties for the failure to timely pay wages earned and unpaid prior to termination, pursuant to California Labor Code Sections 201 and 202.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Cory D. Catignani, Esq. Krystal V. Campos, Esq. VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP 2211 Michelson Drive, Suite 500 Irvine, CA 92612 Phone: (949) 526-7904 Facsimile: (949) 526-7904 Email: cdcatignani@vorys.com kvcampos@vorys.com METAL TRANSPORT: Filing for Class Cert Bid Due April 3, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as EDGAR GUIMARAES and ALEXANDER DURAN, on behalf of themselves and all other : similarly situated persons, v. METAL TRANSPORT, LLC (individually and d/b/a CENTURY EXPRESS); EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY, INC. (individually and d/b/a CENTURY EXPRESS); CENTURY EXPRESS; ABC CORPS. 1-10 (fictitious parties) and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 (fictitious parties), Case No. 3:24-cv-01232-JKM (M.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge Munley entered an order as follows: 1) The parties' request for a stay is granted. 2) This matter is stayed for 120 days for the parties to engage in mediation. 3) The parties shall file a status report every 30 days regarding their good faith efforts to resolve this matter. 4) The case management conference scheduled for Sept. 5, 2025 is postponed and will be rescheduled, if necessary, after Jan. 3, 2026. 5) The following case management deadlines are established: a. Joinder of Parties/ Amendment of Pleadings: Feb. 3, 2026 b. The Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and brief in support: April 3, 2026 c. The Defendants' response and brief in opposition: May 4, 2026 d. The Plaintiffs' reply brief: May 18, 2026 Century has been engaged in providing express courier service. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=1gCdu6 at no extra charge.[CC] MIA AESTHETICS: Wilson Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against MIA Aesthetics Holdings, LLC. The case is styled as Chet Michael Wilson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. MIA Aesthetics Holdings, LLC, Case No. 1:25-cv-24103-XXXX (S.D. Fla., Sept. 9, 2025). The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment. Mia Aesthetics -- https://miaaesthetics.com/ -- offers top-quality, affordable plastic surgery: Brazilian butt lift (BBL), breast augmentation, liposuction, and more.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Avi Robert Kaufman, Esq. KAUFMAN P.A. 31 Samana Drive Miami, FL 33133 Phone: (305) 469-5881 Email: kaufman@kaufmanpa.com MONOLITHIC POWER: Consolidated Complaint Filing Due Nov. 12 ----------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as WATERFORD TOWNSHIP GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., MICHAEL HSING, and BERNIE BLEGIN, Case No. 2:25-cv-00220-JLR (W.D. Wash.), the Hon. Judge Robart entered an order setting case deadlines: 1. Lead Plaintiff shall file a consolidated complaint on or before Nov. 12, 2025; 2. the Defendants shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the consolidated complaint on or before Jan. 13, 2026; 3. If the Defendants move to dismiss the consolidated complaint: a. Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to such motion on or before Feb. 10, 2026; b. The Defendants shall file any reply in further support of such motion on or before March 3, 2026; and c. If applicable, within 10 days of the Court's issuing an order adjudicating such motion, the Parties will confer and propose a schedule for remaining applicable pretrial dates, including any filing of a motion for class certification. Monolithic designs, develops, and markets integrated power semiconductor solutions and power delivery architectures. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=KACXQu at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Kim D. Stephens, Esq. Rebecca L. Solomon, Esq. TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC 1200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 682-5600 Facsimile: (206) 682-2992 E-mail: kstephens@tousley.com rsolomon@tousley.com NAVY FEDERAL: Faces Edey Suit Over Unauthorized Personal Loans -------------------------------------------------------------- STACY EDEY, KELLIE HIGH, and RONNICE LEE, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated individuals v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Case No. 2:25-cv-00554-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va., Sept. 8, 2025) concerns unauthorized personal loans that are now affecting the credit profiles of Plaintiffs and countless other NFCU members. According to the complaint, in late 2023 and early 2024, fraudsters borrowed money via personal loans through Plaintiffs' NFCU membership accounts without the Plaintiffs' authorization or permission. The personal loans were approved by NFCU without correctly verifying the applicants' identities, as NFCU promised to do in its form Membership Agreement. NFCU also did not use reasonable security procedures to confirm that the applicants were, in fact, the NFCU members who they purported to be. The Plaintiff contends that had NFCU considered information available to it to verify personal loan applicants like the fraudsters purporting to be Plaintiffs, it would have known that Plaintiffs did not themselves apply for the personal loans. 10. But most notably, NFCU sent documents and correspondence relating to the personal loans, including the "ePromissory Note, Security Agreement, and Disclosure" and requests for e-signatures, to email addresses not belonging to Plaintiffs, at the instruction of the perpetrators. Callers purporting to represent NFCU then instructed Plaintiffs to review their recent account activity and confirm the so-called deposits reflected by NFCU's account records. The purported NFCU employees called Plaintiffs using verified NFCU phone numbers, including NFCU's "24/7 Member Services" telephone number, the suit adds. NFCU offers loans with affordable rates and manageable terms. They wanted to encourage building financial security by providing a safe place to deposit savings and earn dividends. So they pooled their money and invited others to join. NFCU is a member-owned and not-for-profit credit union exclusively serving the military, veterans and their families.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Kristi C. Kelly, Esq. Andrew J. Guzzo, Esq. Casey S. Nash, Esq. J. Patrick McNichol, Esq. Matthew G. Rosendahl, Esq. KELLY GUZZO, PLC 3925 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 202 Fairfax, VA 22030 Telephone: (703) 424-7572 Facsimile: (703) 591-0167 Email: kkelly@kellyguzzo.com aguzzo@kellyguzzo.com casey@kellyguzzo.com pat@kellyguzzo.com matt@kellyguzzo.com - and - Dale W. Pittman, Esq. THE LAW OFFICE OF DALE W. PITTMAN, P.C. The Eliza Spotswood House 112-A West Tabb Street Petersburg, VA 23803 Telephone: (804) 861-6000 Facsimile: (804) 861-3368 E-mail: dale@pittmanlawoffice.com NEW START: Appeals Arbitration and Dismissal Order in Lambert Suit ------------------------------------------------------------------ NEW START CAPITAL LLC, et al. are taking an appeal from a court order granting in part and denying in part their motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss in the lawsuit entitled Alana Lambert, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. New Start Capital LLC, et al., Defendants, Case No. 1:24-cv-8055, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter, the lawsuit is brought against the Defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the New York Labor Law, the New York Wage Theft Prevention Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York State City Rights Law. On Mar. 7, 2025, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On Mar. 21, 2025, the Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend/correct file second amended complaint. On May 2, 2025, the Defendants filed a cross motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the Plaintiffs' second amended complaint. On Aug. 7, 2025, Judge Gregory H. Woods granted in part and denied in part the Defendants' motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss and granted the Plaintiffs' motion to amend. Plaintiff Wiltz's claims are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs LeRouge's and Jacobs's claims are compelled to arbitration. The Plaintiffs' fraudulent inducement claims are dismissed as duplicative. The Defendants' motions to dismiss or compel arbitration are denied as to the remaining claims. The appellate case is entitled Lambert v. New Start Capital LLC, Case No. 25-2160, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed on September 9, 2025. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellees ALANA LAMBERT, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, are represented by: Chaya M. Gourarie, Esq. BELL LAW GROUP PLLC 116 Jackson Avenue Syosset, NY 11791 Defendants-Appellants NEW START CAPITAL LLC, et al. are represented by: Bryn Goodman, Esq. JACKSON LEWIS PC 666 Third Avenue, Suite 28th Floor New York, NY 10017 NEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN: UFCW Local Files Antitrust Trust ----------------------------------------------------------- UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. THE NEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, Defendant, Case No. 2:25-cv-05023 (E.D.N.Y., September 8, 2025) is a class action complaint against the Defendant for violations of federal antitrust law, the Donnelly Act, and common law, seeking actual damages, treble damages, disgorgement of profits, injunctive relief, a declaratory judgment, reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, and pre and post-judgment interest. According to the complaint, NYP has leveraged its market power in New York City to limit price competition in the market for general acute care inpatient hospital services. Specifically, NYP's contracts with health insurers impose "anti-steering" provisions which prevent the health plans from incentivizing their members to seek out lower-cost services from other hospital systems, to the detriment of payors of healthcare services, such as Plaintiff and members of the Class. NYP imposes these provisions as a condition of including any NYP facilities in the networks of commercial health plans, says the suit. As a result of NYP's practices, competition among hospitals based on quality and cost has been severely constrained, and costs for health plans have increased. NYP's contracting practices insulate it from competitive market pressures that would otherwise force it to lower prices or improve efficiency. Consequently, the Plaintiff and members of the Class continue to suffer substantial financial harm through excessive healthcare expenditures directly resulting from NYP's anticompetitive restraints, the suit alleges. Plaintiff UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund is a self-funded employee welfare benefits fund with its principal place of business in Westbury, New York. The Plaintiff is a multi-employer benefit fund that provides healthcare benefits to members and dependents of the union, UFCW Local 1500. The New York and Presbyterian Hospital provides medical and surgical hospital services.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Gregory S. Asciolla, Esq. Alexander E. Barnett, Esq. Geralyn J. Trujillo, Esq. Jonathan S. Crevier, Esq. Noah L. Cozad, Esq. Theodore J. Salem-Mackall, Esq. DICELLO LEVITT LLP 485 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1001 New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (646) 933-1000 E-mail: gasciolla@dicellolevitt.com abarnett@dicellolevitt.com gtrujillo@dicellolevitt.com jcrevier@dicellolevitt.com ncozad@dicellolevitt.com tsalemmackall@dicellolevitt.com - and - Domenico Minerva, Esq. LABATON KELLER SUCHAROW LLP 140 Broadway New York, NY 10005 Telephone: (212) 907-0887 E-mail: dminerva@labaton.com - and - Bruce E. Gerstein, Esq. Deborah A. Elman, Esq. GARWIN GERSTEIN & FISHER LLP 88 Pine St, Suite 2810 Telephone: (212) 398-0055 New York, NY 10005 E-mail: bgerstein@garwingerstein.com delman@garwingerstein.com NEW YORK: Deprives Medical Health Treatment, Dunn Suit Says ----------------------------------------------------------- JAMES DUNN, et al., individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION (DOCCS), COMMISSIONER DANIEL F. MARTUSCELLO III, in his official capacity, SUPERINTENDENT BENNIE THORPE, in his official capacity, NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, COMMISSIONER ANN MARIE T. SULLIVAN, in her official capacity, RMHU UNIT CHIEF VINCENT LORUSSO, in his official capacity, Governor KATHY HOCHUL, in her official capacity, and THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Case No. 9:25-cv-01242-MAD-DJS (N.D.N.Y., Sept. 8, 2025) alleges that the Defendants are knowingly depriving individuals in the Residential Mental Health Unit at Marcy Correctional Facility of all out-of-cell programming and mental health and medical treatment and keeping them almost entirely isolated in violation of the U.S. Const. amend. VIII; Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. sections 12131, 12132; and 29 U.S.C. section 794. According to the complaint, years in the making, the RMHU was designed in response to a 2002 lawsuit filed by Disability Advocates, Inc. (DAI) Prisoners' Legal Services of New York, and others, Disability Advocates, Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental Health, that alleged that the Department of Correctional Services and the Office of Mental Health (OMH) provided inadequate mental health services within the prison system. The underlying complaint detailed prisoners being isolated in their small, cramped cells for 24 hours a day for months on end, absent the occasional "call-out." There was no opportunity to attend programs or other rehabilitative activities, no congregate recreation, and little to no mental health treatment aside from medication. The underlying lawsuit alleged these conditions caused significant life-threatening psychiatric deterioration. The 2007 settlement agreement aimed to bar the long-established practice of placing incarcerated individuals with serious mental illness into segregated confinement settings that have been proven to be countertherapeutic. The creation of RMHUs was specifically articulated in the 2007 settlement agreement and was codified into law in 2008. The Defendants are aware that RMHU residents should be getting out-of-cell therapeutic programming, and interactions with mental health professionals, counselors, offender rehabilitation coordinators (ORC), group therapy, and other out-of-cell therapeutic activities, asserts the suit. As a result of the Defendants' actions, incarcerated individuals in the Marcy RMHU are denied the opportunity to participate in and benefit from DOCCS services and programs for which they are otherwise eligible solely on the basis of their disability. With this lawsuit, the Plaintiffs and all class members seek declaratory and injunctive relief to redress the violation of their rights pursuant to Title II of the ADA, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution The Plaintiffs include LACQUAN BERKLEY, LUIS GARCIA, DEJOUR NESMITH, GILBERT CARRION, TYRELL ESCOBAR, SAMUEL DENIS, JOSE CORNEJO, and DEVIN HOYT. NYS DOCCS states that it is "responsible for the care, custody, and treatment" of the people held in the state prisons.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Megan Drum, Esq. Molly Paris, Esq. Jessica Richwalder, Esq. DISABILITY RIGHTS NEW YORK 279 Troy Road, Ste 9 Rensselaer, NY 12144 Telephone: (518) 432-7861 - and - Andrew Stecker, Esq. Hallie Mitnick, Esq. Marina Jerry, Esq. Sara Jensen, Esq. PRISONERS LEGAL SERVICES 41 State Street, Ste M112 Albany, NY 12207 Telephone: (518) 438-8046 NHB Holdings: Spann Files Suit in N.D. Ohio ------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against NHB Holdings, LLC, et al. The case is styled as Joyce Spann, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. NHB Holdings, LLC, New Horizons Baking Company, LLC, Genesis Baking Company, LLC, Metraco Transportation Company, LLC, New Horizons Food Solutions, LLC, Case No. 3:25-cv-01912-JJH (N.D. Ohio, Sept. 10, 2025). The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury. NHB Holdings LLC operates as a holding company.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Todd B. Naylor, Esq. GOLDENBERG SCHNEIDER One West Fourth Street, 18th Floor Cincinnati, OH 45202 Phone: (513) 345-8291 Fax: (513) 345-8294 Email: tnaylor@gs-legal.com - and - Jeffrey S. Goldenberg, Esq. GOLDENBERG SCHNEIDER 4445 Lake Forest Drive, Ste. 490 Cincinnati, OH 45242 Phone: (513) 345-8291 Email: jgoldenberg@gs-legal.com OCTAPHARMA PLASMA: Settles Data Breach Class Suit for $2.55-Mil. ---------------------------------------------------------------- William C. Gendron of ClaimDEPOT reports that consumers who received a notice from Octapharma Plasma Inc. informing them of an April 2024 data breach may have affected their personal information may qualify to claim up to $5,050 from a class action settlement. Octapharma Plasma Inc. agreed to pay $2.55 million to resolve a class action lawsuit alleging Octapharma Plasma failed to implement adequate cybersecurity measures, resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive personal information, including: -- Names -- Dates of birth -- Social Security numbers -- Health data -- Donor eligibility information Who can file an Octapharma Plasma claim? Class members must meet the following criteria: -- They are a living individual. -- They currently live in the United States. -- They received a notice from Octapharma Plasma Inc. stating the data breach may have affected their personal information. California residents as of April 17, 2024, are eligible for an additional statutory payment. How much is the data breach payout? The total settlement fund is $2,550,000. After deducting court-approved attorneys' fees, service awards for class representatives and settlement administration costs, the settlement administrator will distribute the remaining funds to class members who submit valid claims. -- Documented losses: Up to $5,000 for out-of-pocket expenses or financial losses related to the data incident. Expenses another source already reimbursed are not eligible. -- Flat cash payment: Instead of documented losses, class members can claim a flat cash payment estimated to be $100. The actual amount may be higher or lower depending on the number of valid claims submitted and the total amount claimed. -- California statutory payment: An additional $50 for those who resided in California as of April 17, 2024 -- Credit monitoring: All class members can elect to receive three years of credit monitoring, which includes real-time monitoring at all three credit bureaus, dark web scanning, public record monitoring, medical identity monitoring, identity theft insurance with no deductible and access to fraud resolution agents. If the total amount claimed exceeds the available funds, the settlement administrator may reduce payments on a pro rata basis. If the total amount claimed is less than the available funds, the settlement administrator may increase payments on a pro rata basis. How to claim a class action payment Class members can file a claim online or download, print and complete the PDF claim form (beginning Page 97) and mail it to the settlement administrator. The claim deadline is Nov. 14, 2025. Settlement administrator's mailing address: Woodall v. Octapharma Plasma Inc. Settlement Administrator, P.O. Box 301134, Los Angeles, CA 90030-1134 Is proof or documentation required to submit a claim? -- To file an online claim, class members must provide the claim ID and PIN located on their settlement notice. -- To claim documented losses, class members must provide reasonable documentation (e.g., bank statements, police reports receipts, etc.) showing out-of-pocket expenses or losses related to the data breach. -- To claim the flat cash payment, California payment or credit monitoring benefit, class members need only select the appropriate option on the claim form. Payout options -- PayPal (online claims only) -- Venmo (online claims only) -- Paper check $2.55 million settlement fund breakdown -- Settlement administration costs: To be determined -- Attorneys' fees: Up to $849,915 -- Attorneys' expenses: To be determined -- Service awards to class representatives: Up to $2,500 each -- Credit monitoring costs: Dependent on number of valid claims -- Payments to eligible class members: The remainder of the fund Important dates -- Exclusion deadline: Oct. 29, 2025 -- Deadline to file a claim: Nov, 14, 2025 -- Final approval hearing: Dec. 4, 2025 When is the Octapharma Plasma settlement payout date? The settlement administrator will distribute payments approximately 60 days after the court grants final approval of the settlement and resolves any appeals. Why did this class action settlement happen? The class action lawsuit alleged Octapharma Plasma Inc. failed to implement adequate cybersecurity measures, resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive personal information. The plaintiffs claimed this led to risks of identity theft and other harms. Octapharma denied any wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the risks and costs of further litigation. [GN] OLAPLEX HOLDINGS: $47.5MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Dec. 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LESLIE LILIEN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, v. OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 2:22-cv-08395-SVW(SKx) CLASS ACTION SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES To: all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded common stock of Olaplex Holdings, Inc. ("Olaplex" or the "Company") on or before November 12, 2021, pursuant and/or traceable to the Offering Documents for Olaplex's initial public offering ("IPO"), and who were allegedly damaged thereby (the "Settlement Class"). YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, that Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff, on behalf of itself and all members of the proposed Settlement Class, and Olaplex and JuE Wong, Eric Tiziani, Tiffany Walden, Christine Dagousset, Tricia Glynn, Deirdre Findlay, Janet Gurwitch, Martha Morfitt, David Mussafer, Emily White, Michael White, and Paula Zusi (the "Individual Defendants," together with Olaplex, the "Defendants"), have reached a proposed settlement of the class action (the "Action") in the amount of $47,500,000 (the "Settlement"). Defendants deny any liability or wrongdoing. A hearing will be held before the Honorable Stephen V. Wilson, either in person or remotely in the Court's discretion, on December 1, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. (PT) at the United States District Court, Central District of California, First Street Courthouse, 350 W. 1st Street, Courtroom 10A, 10th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90012 (the "Settlement Hearing") to determine whether the Court should: (i) approve the proposed Settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (ii) dismiss the Action with prejudice as provided in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated August 1, 2025; (iii) for purposes of the Settlement only, finally certify the Settlement Class, finally certify Lead Plaintiff as Class Representative for the Settlement Class, and finally appoint the law firm of Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP as Class Counsel and Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP as Liaison Counsel for the Settlement Class; (iv) approve the proposed Plan of Allocation for distribution of the proceeds of the Settlement (the "Net Settlement Fund") to Settlement Class Members; and (v) approve Lead Counsel's Fee and Expense Application. The Court may change the date of the Settlement Hearing, or hold it remotely, without providing another notice. You do NOT need to attend the Settlement Hearing in order to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A MONETARY PAYMENT. If you have not yet received a Postcard Notice, you may obtain copies of the Postcard Notice, long-form Notice, and Claim Form by visiting the website, www.OlaplexSecuritiesSettlement.com, or by contacting the Claims Administrator at: Olaplex Securities Settlement c/o Epiq Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 2167 Portland, OR 97208-2167 1-877-879-0943 www.OlaplexSecuritiesSettlement.com info@OlaplexSecuritiesSettlement.com Inquiries, other than requests for copies of notices or about the status of a claim, may also be made to Lead Counsel: LABATON KELLER SUCHAROW LLP Lauren A. Ormsbee, Esq. 140 Broadway New York, NY 10005 www.labaton.com settlementquestions@labaton.com 1-888-219-6877 If you are a Settlement Class Member, to be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must submit a Claim Form postmarked or submitted online no later than November 24, 2025. If you are a Settlement Class Member and do not timely submit a valid Claim Form, you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, but you will nevertheless be bound by all judgments or orders entered by the Court relating to the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable. If you are a Settlement Class Member and wish to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you must submit a written request for exclusion in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice available on the settlement website, and such request must be received no later than November 10, 2025. If you properly exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you will not be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court relating to the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable, and you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund. Any objections to the proposed Settlement, Lead Counsel's Fee and Expense Application, and/or the proposed Plan of Allocation must be filed with the Court, either by mail or in person, and be mailed to counsel for the Parties in accordance with the instructions in the Notice available on the website, such that they are received no later than November 10, 2025. PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT, DEFENDANTS, OR DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL REGARDING THIS NOTICE DATED: September 4, 2025 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA URL: www.OlaplexSecuritiesSettlement.com PACIFIC MARITIME: McColley Suit Removed to S.D. California ---------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Erika Quintero McColley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION; PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, INC.; APM TERMINALS PACIFIC LLC; APS STEVEDORING, LLC; BENICIA PORT TERMINAL COMPANY; CERES TERMINALS INCORPORATED; CRESCENT CITY MARINE WAYS& DRYDOCK COMPANY, INC.; EAGLE MARINE SERVICES, LTD.; EVERPORT TERMINAL SERVICES, INC.; HARBOR INDUSTRIAL SERVICES CORPORATION; INNOVATIVE TERMINAL SERVICES INC.; INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICE INC.; KINDER MORGAN BULK TERMINALS LLC; LBCT, LLC; MARINE TERMINALS CORPORATION; MARINE TERMINALS CORPORATION OF LOS ANGELES; MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC.; MATSON TERMINALS, INC.; METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE COMPANY; OCEAN TERMINAL SERVICES, INC.; PACIFIC CRANE MAINTENANCE COMPANY LP; PACIFIC RO-RO; STEVEDORING, LLC; PASHA STEVEDORING & TERMINALS LP; PORT MAINTENANCE GROUP; SSA MARINE, INC.; SSA TERMINALS, LLC; TERMINAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC.; TOTAL TERMINALS INTERNATIONAL, LLC; TRANSPAC TERMINAL SERVICES, LLC; TRAPAC, LLC; YUSEN TERMINALS, INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No. 25CU018738C was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, to the United States District Court for Southern District of California on Sept. 11, 2025, and assigned Case No. 3:25-cv-02372-GPC-MSB. The Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated the California Labor Code and the Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders and asserts seven causes of action: Failure to Pay Wages Including Overtime as Required by Labor Code Sections 510 and 1194; Failure to Provide Meal Periods as Required by Labor Code Sections 226.7, 512; Failure to Provide Rest Periods as Required by Labor Code Sections 226.7, 512; Failure to Indemnify Necessary Business Expenses As Required by Labor Code Section 2802; Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage Statements As Required by Labor Code Section 226; Failure to Pay Timely Wages As Required by Labor Code Section 203 and Violation of Business & Professions Code Section 17200.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Clifford D. Sethness, Esq. SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3300 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5793 Phone: (213) 270-9600 Facsimile: (213) 270-9601 Email: csethness@seyfarth.com - and - Kent M. Roger, Esq. Jesse L. Miller, Esq. Taylor D. Horn, Esq. Afshin Najafi, Esq. SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 Email: kroger@seyfarth.com jmiller@seyfarth.com thorn@seyfarth.com anajafi@seyfarth.com PAMT INVESTMENT: Caruso Sues Over Accommodation Barriers -------------------------------------------------------- Jill Caruso, individually, and on behalf of individuals similarly situated v. PAMT INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, GH DRIVE HOTELS LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, Case No. 1:25-cv-01885 (N.D. Ohio, Sept. 9, 2025), is brought against Defendant pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") due to the Defendant's place of public accommodation which contains barriers for people with disabilities. The Plaintiff has a realistic, credible, existing and continuing threat of discrimination from the Defendant's non-compliance with the ADA with respect to this property as described but not necessarily limited to the allegations contained in this complaint. Plaintiff has reasonable grounds to believe that he will continue to be subjected to discrimination in violation of the ADA by the Defendant. The Plaintiff desires to visit the Defendant's place of business again on future occasions, not only to avail himself of the goods and services available at the property but to assure himself that this property is in compliance with the ADA so that he and others similarly situated will have full and equal enjoyment of the hotel and its amenities without fear of discrimination. The Defendant has discriminated against the individual Plaintiff by denying him access to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages and/or accommodations of the buildings, as prohibited by the ADA, says the complaint. The Plaintiff qualifies as an individual with disability. PAMT Investment Group, LLC and GH Drive Hotels LLC own and operate a hotel located in Austinburg, Ohio.[BN] The Plaintiff is are represented by: Owen B. Dunn, Jr., Esq. LAW OFFCIES OF OWEN B. DUNN, JR. The Offices of Unit C 6800 W. Central Ave., Suite C-1 Toledo, OH 43617 Phone: (419) 241-9661 Facsimile: (419) 241-9737 Email: obdjr@owendunnlaw.com - and - Brian A. Hizer, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN A. HIZER The Offices of Unit C 6800 W. Central Ave., Suite C-1 Toledo, OH 43617 Phone: 419-841-3600 Fax: 419-842-9966 Email: brianahizer@bex.net PANAMERICAN CONSULTING: Dumay-Mellon Suit Removed to D. New Jersey ------------------------------------------------------------------ The case captioned as Marie Yolene Dumay-Mellon, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated v. PANAMERICAN CONSULTING, LLC; EPPS, LLC; and JOHN DOES 1–10, Case No. BER-L-5244-25 was removed from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, in and for the County of Los Angeles, to the United States District Court for District of New Jersey on Sept. 11, 2025, and assigned Case No. 2:25-cv-15457. The Complaint alleges, inter alia, violations of federal law, including the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act and the Federal Trade Commission Telemarketing Sales Rule.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Yongmoon Kim, Esq. Hasan Siddiqui, Esq. KIM LAW FIRM, LLC 411 Hackensack Avenue, Suite 701 Hackensack, NJ 07601 The Defendants are represented by: Bryan R. Lentz, Esq. BOCHETTO & LENTZ, P.C. 141 High Street Mount Holly, NJ 08081 Phone: 215-735-3900 PANDADOC INC: Pretrial Management Order Entered on Senior Suit -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as FRANK SENIOR, v. PANDADOC, INC., Case No. 1:25-cv-05942-JHR-BCM (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Barbara Moses entered a general pretrial management order as follows: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), the Plaintiff's deadline to serve Defendants is Oct. 20, 2025. Discovery applications, including letter-motions requesting discovery conferences, must be made promptly after the need for such an application arises and must comply with Local Civil Rule 37.2 and section 2(b) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices. For motions other than discovery motions, pre-motion conferences are not required but may be requested where counsel believe that an informal conference with the Court may obviate the need for a motion or narrow the issues. Requests to adjourn a court conference or other court proceeding (including a telephonic court conference), or to extend a deadline, must be made in writing and in compliance with section 2(a) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices. Telephone requests for adjournments or extensions will not be entertained. In accordance with § 1(d) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices, letters and letter motions are limited to four pages, exclusive of attachments. If you are aware of any party or attorney who should receive notice in this action, other than those currently listed on the docket sheet, please notify Courtroom Deputy Tamika Kay at (212) 805-0228 immediately. On July 21, 2025, the Plaintiff filed the complaint, as well as a request for issuance of summons as to the Pandadoc. PandaDoc is an American software company that provides SaaS software. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=u1uHRM at no extra charge.[CC] PICO ENTERPRISES: Kennedy Suit Removed to C.D. California --------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Richard Allen Kennedy, Jr., individually; and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. PICO ENTERPRISES, INC., a corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. CIVSB2521636 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of San Bernardino, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on Sept. 10, 2025, and assigned Case No. 5:25-cv-02379. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges eight separate causes of action against Defendant. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges: Failure to Pay Minimum and Straight Time Wages; Failure to Pay Overtime Wages; Failure to Provide Meal Periods; Failure to Authorize and Permit Rest Periods; Failure to Timely Pay Final Wages at Termination; Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage Statements; Failure to Indemnify Employees for Expenditures; and Unfair Business Practices.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Joanne Alnajjar Buser, Esq. QUARLES & BRADY LLP 101 West Broadway, Suite 1500 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: 619-237-5200 Facsimile: 619-615-0700 Email: joanne.buser@quarles.com PRESTIGE MAINTENANCE: Rosales Files Suit in E.D. New York --------------------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Prestige Maintenance USA, LTD. The case is styled as Vicente Flores Rosales, Yesenia Castillo, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Prestige Maintenance USA, LTD., Case No. 1:25-mc-03615-NCM (E.D.N.Y., Sept. 10, 2025). Prestige Maintenance USA -- https://prestigeusa.net/ -- is your one-stop shop for commercial cleaning excellence, social responsibility, and ongoing partnership.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Patricia C. Kakalec, Esq. KAKALEC LAW PLLC 80 Broad Street, Suite 703 New York, NY 10004 Phone: (212) 705-8730 Fax: (646) 759-1587 Email: patricia@kakaleclaw.com PROPERTIES 2000-RICHMOND: Mellenthin Sues Over Physical Barriers ---------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Mellenthin, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. SM PROPERTIES 2000-RICHMOND, LLC, Case No. 4:25-cv-01372 (E.D. Mo., Sept. 11, 2025), is brought based upon Defendant's failure to remove physical barriers to access and violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and the ADA's Accessibility Guidelines ("ADAAG"). The Plaintiff has visited the Property a dozen times before as a customer and advocate for the disabled. The Plaintiff intends to revisit the Property within six months after the barriers to access detailed in this Complaint are removed and the Property is accessible again. The purpose of the revisit is to be a return customer to Schnucks, to determine if and when the Property is made accessible and to substantiate already existing standing for this lawsuit for Advocacy Purposes. The Plaintiff intends on revisiting the Property to purchase goods and/or services as a return customer as well as for Advocacy Purposes but does not intend to re-expose himself to the ongoing barriers to access and engage in a futile gesture of visiting the public accommodation known to Plaintiff to have numerous and continuing barriers to access, says the complaint. The Plaintiff uses a wheelchair for mobility purposes. SM PROPERTIES 2000-RICHMOND, LLC is a domestic limited liability corporation that transacts business in the State of Missouri and within this judicial district.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Douglas S. Schapiro, Esq. THE SCHAPIRO LAW GROUP, P.L. 7301-A W. Palmetto Park Rd., #100A Boca Raton, FL 33433 Phone: (561) 807-7388 Email: schapiro@schapirolawgroup.com R & S BEVERAGE: Mejorado Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct. ------------------------------------------------------ A class action lawsuit has been filed against R & S Beverage Company LP. The case is styled as Abel Mejorado, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. R & S Beverage Company LP., Case No. 25CU0404 (Cal. Super. Ct., Kings Cty., Sept. 10, 2025). The case type is stated as "Other Employment - Civil Unlimited." R & S Beverage Company LP is a Family-owned beer distributor in the High Desert and surrounding Southern California areas.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Joseph Lavi, Esq. LAVI & EBRAHIMIAN, LLP 8889 W Olympic Blvd., Ste. 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90211-3638 Phone: 310-432-0000 Fax: 310-432-0001 Email: jlavi@lelawfirm.com R.J. REYNOLDS: Filing for Class Certification Due Nov. 5, 2026 -------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Bell, v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, Case No. 3:25-cv-04521-TLT (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Trina Thompson entered a case management and scheduling order as follows: Trial date: Feb. 28, 2028 Final pretrial conference: Jan. 20, 2028 Expert discovery cut-off: June 3, 2027 Fact discovery cut-off: April 9, 2027 Last day to hear motion for class March 9, 2027 certification: Class certification motion due: Nov. 5, 2026 R. J. is an American electronic cigarette company. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept. 2, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=IHQgxt at no extra charge.[CC] RB GLOBAL INC.: Haxton Masonry Suit Transferred to N.D. Illinois ---------------------------------------------------------------- The case styled as Haxton Masonry, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. RB Global Inc.; Rouse Services LLC; United Renatls, Inc.; Sunbelt Renals, Inc.; Herc Rentals Inc.; HERC Holdings Inc.; H&E Equipment Services Inc.; Sunstate Equipment Co., LLC; Case No. 2:25-cv-03902 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on Sept. 10, 2025. The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:25-cv-10277 to the proceeding. The nature of suit is stated as Anti-Trust. RB Global, Inc. -- https://rbglobal.com/ -- provides a marketplace for insights, services, and transaction solutions for commercial assets and vehicles.[BN] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Kevin F. Ruf, Esq. Pavithra Rajesh, Esq. GLANCY PRONGAY AND MURRAY LLP 1925 Century Park East Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (310) 201-9150 Fax: (310) 201-9160 Email: kruf@glancylaw.com prajesh@glancylaw.com - and - Brian D. Brooks, Esq. MURRAY, FRANK & SAILER, LLP 275 Madison Ave New York, NY 10016 Phone: (212) 682-1818 Deborah A. Elman, Esq. 88 Pine Street, 28th Floor, Suite 2810 New York, NY 10005 Phone: (212) 398-0055 Fax: (212) 764-6620 Email: delman@garwingerstein.com - and - Lee Albert, Esq. GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP 230 Park Avenue, Suite 530 New York, NY 10169 Phone: (212) 682-5340 Email: Lalbert@glancylaw.com REYNOLDS CONSUMER: Parties Must File Update on Settlement Status ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as Washington v. Reynolds Consumer Products LLC, Case No. 1:24-cv-02327-ALC-RFT (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Robyn Tarnofsky entered an order granting in part the Parties application for extension of discovery: -- The Parties shall file provide joint update on the status but not on the substance on their settlement effort by Sept. 26, 2025. Reynolds provides packaging products. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=nrRNGU at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: George V. Granade, Esq. REESE LLP 8484 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 515 Los Angeles, CA 90211 Telephone: (310) 393-0070 Facsimile: (212) 253-4272 E-mail: ggranade@reesellp.com The Defendant is represented by: Nilda M. Isidro, Esq. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP One Vanderbilt Ave New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 801-9200 Facsimile: (212) 801-6400 E-mail: nilda.isidro@gtlaw.com RIVER POINT FARMS: Barak Suit Removed to E.D. Washington -------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Elizabeth Barak, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. RIVER POINT FARMS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Case No. 25-2-01779-03 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington for the County of Benton, to the United States District Court for Eastern District of Washington on Sept. 11, 2025, and assigned Case No. 4:25-cv-05115. The Plaintiff purports to allege, on behalf of herself individually and on behalf of a putative class of individuals, that Defendant committed unlawful compensation practices in violation of Washington State law.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Adam S. Belzberg, Esq. Aaron R. Doyer, Esq. STOEL RIVES, LLP 600 University Street, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206.624.0900 Facsimile: 206.386.7500 Email: adam.belzberg@stoel.com aaron.doyer@stoel.com ROCKY BRANDS: Filing for Class Cert Bid Due May 8, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as MILTITA CASILLAS, v. ROCKY BRANDS, INC., Case No. 2:25-cv-03575-WLH-SSC (C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Wesley Hsu entered a civil pretrial schedule and trial order: The Scheduling Conference scheduled for Sept. 5, 2025, is vacated. The pretrial schedule governing this case is set forth in the far right column labeled "Court Order" located on the parties' Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet, which accompanies this Order. While parties should be prepared to start trial on the date set by the Court and should appear on that date absent further order, the parties and their witnesses should be prepared to trail for up to 30 days if needed. If the parties wish to set additional or alternative dates, they must file a stipulation and proposed order setting forth the dates requested and demonstrating good cause. Setting additional or alternative dates may be especially appropriate in class actions, patent cases, or cases for benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Last date to hear motion to amend Oct. 3, 2025 pleadings/add parties: Last date to hear motion for class May 8, 2026 Certification: Fact discovery cut-Off: July 10, 2026 Expert discovery cut-Off: Sept. 18, 2026 Last date to hear Daubert motions: Dec. 18, 2026 Rocky designs, develops, manufactures and markets premium quality footwear and apparel. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=W5ndyk at no extra charge.[CC] SANTANDER CONSUMER: Wins Summary Judgment v. Hanson --------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as RANDY HANSON and JENNIFER HANSON, v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., Case No. 3:22-cv-00623-wmc (W.D. Wis.), the Hon. Judge William Conley entered an order that: 1) The Plaintiffs' motion to stay is denied. 2) The Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted. 3) The Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is denied as moot. 4) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment consistent with this opinion and close this case. Accordingly, the Defendant has demonstrated that there is no dispute as to a material fact and that it is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law on all alleged violations of the UCC. Therefore, the Plaintiffs' claims for monetary relief (Counts I-IV) as well as injunctive relief (Counts V-VI) are dismissed. Finally, because the Plaintiffs' claims lack merit, plaintiffs are not proper class representatives and their motion for class certification is denied as moot. The court finds that while it has jurisdiction to decide the principal legal issue presented -- whether the UCC precludes Santander from reducing the Hanson's outstanding debt by the amount it obtained at a wholesale auction to other dealers, rather than at a retail, public auction or based on a "fair market value" assessment -- the Hansons have failed to show that Santander violated that law, nor that this court should. Accordingly, the Defendant is entitled to summary judgment as to all claims, rendering plaintiffs’ motion for class certification moot. The Plaintiffs Randy and Jennifer Hanson brought this putative class action in state court, seeking injunctive and monetary relief for themselves and other Wisconsin buyers allegedly harmed by Santander's repossession and deficiency collection practices in violation of the Wisconsin Uniform Commercial Code. Santander provides automotive financing services. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=4A2lbT at no extra charge.[CC] SELLAN STRUCTURAL: Seeks to Stay Class Cert Response ---------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as CONEJO et al., v. SELLAN STRUCTURAL ERECTORS, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-02930-SKC-STV (D. Colo.), the Defendants ask the Court to enter an order granting their motion to stay the their response to the Plaintiffs' motion for Rule 23 Class Certification and allowing the Defendants 14 days after the Court rules on the Defendants' motion to dismiss to respond to the Plaintiffs' Rule 23 motion. Sellan is the on-site steel erection division of Sellan, LLC, a company that also provides steel fabrication and design services. A copy of the Defendants' motion dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=LkINKY at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiffs are represented by: Penn A. Dodson, Esq. ANDERSON DODSON, P.C. CO Bar Reg No. 54677 11 Broadway, Suite 615 New York, NY 10004 Telephone: (212) 961-7639 E-mail: penn@andersondodson.com The Defendants are represented by: Stacey A. Campbell, Esq. Brett A. Whitley, Esq. Bayan Biazar, Esq. CAMPBELL LITIGATION, P.C. 1410 N. High Street Denver, CO 80218 Telephone: (303) 536-1833 E-mail: stacey@campbell-litigation.com brett@campbell-litigation.com bayan@campbell-litigation.com SHEEX INC: Devivo Suit Removed to W.D. Washington ------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Andrew Devivo, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated v. SHEEX, INC., Case No. 25-2-10516-0 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Pierce, to the United States District Court for Western District of Washington on Sept. 10, 2025, and assigned Case No. 3:25-cv-05807. The Plaintiff contends that Defendant violated the Washington Commercial Electronic Mail Act ("CEMA"), Chapter 19.190.020 RCW, and the Washington Consumer Protection Act ("CPA"), Chapter 19.86.020 RCW, by sending emails with misleading or false subject lines to Washington consumers for the commercial purpose of marketing Sheep's products.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Meegan B. Brooks, Esq. BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 3100 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: 628.600.2232 Email: mbrooks@beneschlaw.com SHOMA GROUP: Class Settlement in Castillo Suit Gets Initial Nod --------------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ANTONIO CASTILLO, et al., v. SHOMA GROUP, LLC d/b/a SHOMA BAZAAR, SHOMA BAZAAR ONE, LLC, MASOUD SHOJAEE, PAUL J. PRICE, and STEPHANIE SHOJAEE, Case No. 1:24-cv-22055-EAL (S.D. Fla.), the Hon. Judge Enjolique A. Lett entered an order granting joint motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement, conditional certification of the settlement class, appointment of the Plaintiff's counsel as class counsel, and approval of the proposed notice of settlement and class action settlement procedure: 1. The Court certifies, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. section 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA'), a settlement collective whose members are referred to as "FLSA Class Members," and defined as: "All hourly employees of Shoma Bazaar One, LLC other than the Named Plaintiffs who were employed in the bar area or as runners or bussers, and who worked any shifts at the same time that an alleged manager allegedly participated in the tip pool at the Shoma restaurant located at 9420 N.W. 41st Street, Doral, Florida 33178, from its opening in 2022 through the execution of the Agreement." 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, a settlement class whose members are referred to as "Rule 23 Class Members" and defined as: "All hourly employees of Shoma Bazaar One, LLC other than the Named Plaintiffs who were employed in the bar area or as runners or bussers, and who worked any shifts at the same time that an alleged manager allegedly participated in the tip pool at the Shoma restaurant located at 9420 N.W. 41st Street, Doral, Florida 33178, from its opening in 2022 through the execution of the Agreement." 3. The Court appoints Andres Vidales and Vidales Law, as Class Counsel to the Class. 4. A Fairness Hearing is scheduled to be held before the undersigned on Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2025, at 10:00 A.M. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=wfeaYx at no extra charge.[CC] SILVERGATE CAPITAL: Court Certifies Settlement Class ---------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit re Silvergate Capital Corporation Securities Litigation, Case No. 3:22-cv-01936-JES-MSB (S.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge James Simmons, Jr. entered an order certifying for the purposes of the Settlement only: "(a) All persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded common stock of Silvergate Capital from Nov. 7, 2019 through March 21, 2023, inclusive, and were damaged thereby, and (b) All persons and entities who purchased Silvergate Capital securities in and/or traceable to any of Silvergate Capital's securities offerings during 2021, and were damaged thereby (collectively, the "Settlement Class". Excluded from the Settlement Class are (a) Defendants; (b) directors and officers of Defendants (at all relevant times); (c) Defendants' immediate family members and their legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns; and (d) any entity in which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest; provided, however, that no Investment Vehicle shall be excluded from the Settlement Class. Also excluded from the Settlement Class are the persons listed on Exhibit 1, who have excluded themselves by submitting a timely, complete, and valid request for exclusion that is accepted by the Court. . The Court also entered an order: -- appointing the Plaintiffs as Class Representatives for the Settlement Class, and -- appointing Lead Counsel Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC and Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class. Silvergate is a provider of various financial infrastructure solutions and services. A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=y5uLaS at no extra charge.[CC] SINGULARITY FUTURE: $6.5MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Dec. 17 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Simpluris, Inc., court-appointed settlement administrator, issued a statement regarding the proposed settlement in Gao v. Singularity Future Technology Ltd. et al., No. 1:22-cv-07499 (E.D.N.Y.). NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT For more information, visit www.SingularitySecuritiesSettlement.com A proposed Settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against Singularity. The individuals who brought the lawsuit claim that certain of Singularity's actions violated federal securities laws. Singularity denies that it did anything wrong, and the Court has not decided who is right. The parties have agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid the risks, disruption, and uncertainties of continued litigation. A copy of the Settlement is available online. WHO IS INLCUDED IN THE SETTLEMENT? The Settlement is for all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Singularity securities between February 2, 2021 and February 24, 2023. The Court has appointed experienced attorneys to represent the Class. These attorneys are called "Class Counsel." WHAT DOES THE SETTLEMENT PROVIDE? Singularity will create a Settlement Fund of at least $6,500,000. Part of the Settlement Fund will be used to pay for the fees and costs of litigating the lawsuit and administering the Settlement. The rest of the Settlement Fund will be distributed equally to Class Members who file a valid claim on time. HOW DO I RECEIVE A BENEFIT? Visit www.SingularitySecuritiesSettlement.com or scan the QR code below to submit your claim. You may also call 1-844-496-0761 to request a paper copy of the Claim Form. Your claim must be submitted online or mailed by January 16, 2026. YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED. If you do not want to be legally bound by the Settlement, you must exclude yourself by December 3, 2025. Unless you exclude yourself, you will not be able to sue Singularity for the claims made in this lawsuit. If you exclude yourself, you cannot get a payment from this Settlement. If you want to object to the Settlement, you may file an objection by December 3, 2025. Instructions on how to exclude yourself or object are available online. WHEN WILL THE COURT DECIDE WHETHER TO APPROVE THE SETTLEMENT? The Court will hold a hearing on December 17, 2025. The Court will approve the Settlement if it decides that the Settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable. The Court will also consider Class Counsel's request for attorneys' fees and expenses; service awards to the people who brought the lawsuit; and other costs. If there are objections to the Settlement, they will also be considered. You may attend the hearing at your own cost, but you do not have to. For more information, visit www.SingularitySecuritiesSettlement.com TARGET CORPORATION: Davis Suit Removed to C.D. California --------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Teyvione Davis, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated v. TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No. CVRI2503588 was removed from the Superior Court of California in and for the County of Riverside, to the United States District Court for Central District of California on Sept. 11, 2025, and assigned Case No. 5:25-cv-02393. The Complaint asserts ten causes of action for failure to pay overtime wages; failure to provide meal periods; failure to provide rest periods; failure to pay minimum wages; failure to pay final wages timely upon termination; failure to timely pay wages during employment; failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements; failure to keep requisite payroll records; failure to reimburse necessary business expenses; and unfair business practices in violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Section 17200.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Jeffrey D. Wohl, Esq. Eric D. Distelburger, Esq. PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 Email: jeffwohl@paulhastings.com ericdistelburger@paulhastings.com - and - Aja S. Nunn, Esq. PAUL HASTINGS LLP 515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: (213) 683-6000 Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 Email: ajanunn@paulhastings.com TEA DATING ADVICE: Diaz Suit Removed to N.D. Illinois ----------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Eric Diaz, Mark Sullivan, and Craig Hatfield, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals v. TEA DATING ADVICE, INC., Case No. 2025MR000408 was removed from the Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois, to the United States District Court for Northern District of Illinois on Sept. 10, 2025, and assigned Case No. 1:25-cv-10895. The Plaintiffs allege a two-count complaint: a single cause of action for violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act ("BIPA") and a single cause of action for violation of the Illinois Right of Publicity Act ("IRPA"). The Plaintiffs allege that Defendant violated BIPA by comparing user-provided photos of men's facial geometry against reverse image searches for other photos previously found on the Tea App or internet. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that Defendant "collects, stores, possess and analyzes the facial geometry of the person featured in the photo without their consent," "failed to make publicly available any BIPA compliant written policy as to Defendant's retention and deletion practices," and "unlawfully disclosed Plaintiffs' and other Class members' facial biometric data to third-party biometric vendors" without consent.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Joel C. Griswold, Esq. Bonnie Keane DelGobbo, Esq. Katharine H. Walton, Esq. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP One North Wacker Drive, Suite 3700 Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: (312) 416-6200 Email: jcgriswold@bakerlaw.com bdelgobbo@bakerlaw.com kwalton@bakerlaw.com TEA DATING ADVICE: Honeycutt Suit Removed to N.D. Illinois ---------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Smone Honeycutt, Jeresa White, and Shantel Sago, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals v. TEA DATING ADVICE, INC., Case No. 2025CH08182 was removed from the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division, to the United States District Court for Northern District of Illinois on Sept. 10, 2025, and assigned Case No. 1:25-cv-10885. The Plaintiffs bring a single count Complaint for a single cause of action: a violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act ("BIPA"). The Plaintiffs allege that Defendant violated BIPA by scanning a user's facial geometry to verify the user's identity. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that Defendant "collected, stored, possessed, and analyzed" their "facial geometry," from uploaded "selfies" or driver's licenses, and, allegedly in violation of BIPA, failed to "obtain proper consent" to collect such biometrics, "make publicly available any BIPA compliant written policy as to Defendant's retention and deletion practices," to inform Plaintiff and the Class "in writing of the specific purpose and length of for which a biometric identifier or biometric information is being captured, collected, stored, and used," and obtain consent to disclose or otherwise disseminate biometrics.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Joel C. Griswold, Esq. Bonnie Keane DelGobbo, Esq. Katharine H. Walton, Esq. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP One North Wacker Drive, Suite 3700 Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: (312) 416-6200 Email: jcgriswold@bakerlaw.com bdelgobbo@bakerlaw.com kwalton@bakerlaw.com TESLA INC: Court Certifies Rule 23 Classes in Matsko Lawsuit ------------------------------------------------------------ In the class action lawsuit captioned as Matsko v. Tesla, Inc., et al. (RE TESLA ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS LITIGATION), Case No. 3:22-cv-05240-RFL (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Rita Lin entered an order certifying classes as follows: 23(b)(2) Class: "All members of the California Arbitration Opt-Out Class and California Pre-Arbitration Class, who have stated that they would like to purchase or subscribe to FSD in the future but cannot rely on the product's future advertising or labelling." Two 23(b)(3) classes: California Arbitration Opt-Out Class: "All persons who purchased or leased from Tesla, Inc. (or any entity it directly or indirectly owns or controls, including but not limited to Tesla Lease Trust and Tesla Finance LLC) a Tesla vehicle and paid a separate amount, either through purchase or subscription, for the Full Self Driving technology package at any time from May 19, 2017, to July 31, 2024, and who either purchased or leased that vehicle in California or who currently reside in California, who opted out of Tesla's arbitration agreement." California Pre-Arbitration Class: "All persons who purchased or leased from Tesla, Inc. (or any entity it directly or indirectly owns or controls, including but not limited to Tesla Lease Trust and Tesla Finance LLC) a Tesla vehicle and paid a separate amount, either through purchase or subscription, for the Full Self-Driving technology package at any time from Oct. 20, 2016, through May 19, 2017 ("Pre-Arbitration Period"), and who either purchased or leased that vehicle in California or who currently reside in California." The Court appoints the Plaintiff Thomas LoSavio as the representative of the certified classes. The Court appoints Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP, Casey Gerry Francavilla Blatt LLP, and Bottini & Bottini, Inc. as class counsel. The Plaintiff alleges that Tesla's conduct violates California's Unfair Competition Law ("UCL"), Consumer Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA"), and False Advertising Law ("FAL"), and further constitutes fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and negligence. The Plaintiff filed a motion for class certification on May 6, 2025. In early 2017, the Plaintiff paid Tesla $5,000 for EAP and $3,000 for the FSD packages for his new Tesla Model S car. LoSavio alleges he purchased these packages because he was misled by the Hardware Statement and Cross-Country Statements. Tesla designs, develops, manufactures, tests, markets, distributes, sells, and leases electric vehicles under the brand name "Tesla." A copy of the Court's order dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=wYLG6p at no extra charge.[CC] THERAPYMATCH INC: Siegel Suit Removed to N.D. California -------------------------------------------------------- The case captioned as Lauren Siegel, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated v. THERAPYMATCH, INC. DBA HEADWAY, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. C25-02238 was removed from the Superior Court for the County of Contra Costa, State of California, to the United States District Court for Northern District of California on Sept. 11, 2025, and assigned Case No. 4:25-cv-07774. The Plaintiff alleges nine causes of action against Headway: Failure to Pay Minimum Wage for All Hours Worked; Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation; Failure to Provide Meal Periods; Failure to Provide Rest Periods; Failure to Indemnify Necessary Business Expenses; Waiting Time Penalties; Failure to Provide Accurate Wage Statements; Violation of Unfair Competition Law; and Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA") Penalties all in violations for the Cal. Bus. & Prof. Codes, Cal. Lab. Codes and IWC Wage Orders.[BN] The Defendants are represented by: Theane Evangelis, Esq. Dhananjay S. Manthripragada, Esq. Alexandria L. Harris, Esq. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Phone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 Email: tevangelis@gibsondunn.com dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com alharris@gibsondunn.com TOURMALINE BIO: Monteverde & Associates Probes Sale to Novartis --------------------------------------------------------------- Class Action Attorney Juan Monteverde with Monteverde & Associates PC (the "M&A Class Action Firm"), headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City, is investigating Tourmaline Bio, Inc. (NASDAQ: TRML) related to its sale to Novartis AG. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Tourmaline shareholders will receive $48.00 in cash per share. Is it a fair deal? Visit link for more info https://monteverdelaw.com/case/tourmaline-bio-inc/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you. NOT ALL LAW FIRMS ARE EQUAL. Before you hire a law firm, you should talk to a lawyer and ask: 1. Do you file class actions and go to Court? 2. When was the last time you recovered money for shareholders? 3. What cases did you recover money in and how much? About Monteverde & Associates PC Our firm litigates and has recovered money for shareholders . . . and we do it from our offices in the Empire State Building. We are a national class action securities firm with a successful track record in trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. No one is above the law. If you own common stock in the above listed company and have concerns or wish to obtain additional information free of charge, please visit our website or contact Juan Monteverde, Esq. either via e-mail at jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com or by telephone at (212) 971-1341. Contact: Juan Monteverde, Esq. MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC The Empire State Building 350 Fifth Ave. Suite 4740 New York, NY 10118 Tel: (212) 971-1341 E-mail: jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com [GN] TRANSUNION LLC: Fails to Secure Customers' Personal Info, Engh Says ------------------------------------------------------------------- MARTIN ENGH, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated v. TRANSUNION, LLC, Case No. 1:25-cv-10790 (N.D. Ill., Sept. 8, 2025), alleges that the Defendant failed to properly secure and safeguard Plaintiff's and Class members' personally identifiable information (PII) stored within the Defendant's information network. According to the complaint, the harm resulting from a breach of private data manifests in a number of ways, including identity theft and financial fraud. The exposure of a person's PII through a data breach ensures that such person will be at a substantially increased and certainly impending risk of identity theft crimes compared to the rest of the population, potentially for the rest of their lives. Mitigating that risk -- to the extent it is even possible to do so -- requires individuals to devote significant time and money to closely monitor their credit, financial accounts, health records, and email accounts, and to take a number of additional prophylactic measures, says the suit. The Plaintiff is a current or former customer of TransUnion and a victim of the Data Breach. On Aug. 26, 2025, the Plaintiff was notified of the Data Breach and of the impact to his PII via letter from the Defendant. TransUnion represents itself as "a global information and insights company that makes trust possible in global commerce."[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Eric Lechtzin, Esq. Marc H. Edelson, Esq. Liberato P. Verderame, Esq. EDELSON LECHTZIN LLP 411 S. State Street, Suite N300 Newtown, PA 18940 Telephone: (215) 867-2399 E-mail: medelson@edelson-law.com elechtzin@edelson-law.com lverderame@edelson-law.com TTI OUTDOOR: Faces Class Lawsuit Over Defective Pressure Washers ---------------------------------------------------------------- Top Class Actions reports that plaintiff Ken Angelini filed a class action lawsuit against TTI Outdoor Power Equipment Inc. Why: Angelini claims the company sold RYOBI defective electric pressure washers that can explode and injure users. Where: The RYOBI class action lawsuit was filed in California federal court. A new class action lawsuit claims that TTI Outdoor Power Equipment sold defective RYOBI electric pressure washers that can explode and injure users. Plaintiff Ken Angelini filed the class action lawsuit against TTI Outdoor Power Equipment on Sept. 2 in California federal court, alleging violations of state and federal consumer laws. According to the RYOBI class action lawsuit, TTI Outdoor Power Equipment manufactured, imported, distributed and sold defective electric pressure washers. Specifically, the pressure washer's capacitor can overheat and burst, causing parts to be forcefully ejected, posing a risk of serious injury from impact to the user or bystanders, the lawsuit states. Consumers who have experienced the defect have repeatedly described the pressure washers "blowing up," the complaint claims. RYOBI refuses to refund recalled pressure washers, lawsuit says TTI has received 135 reports of capacitors overheating, including 41 reports of explosions, resulting in 32 injuries and/or fractures to the fingers, hands, face and eyes, the class action lawsuit states. RYOBI issued a recall instructing customers to "immediately stop using" the tools. However, TTI refuses to provide refunds for the defective pressure washers, the lawsuit alleges. Instead, consumers' only option is to attempt to repair the product themselves, regardless of whether they have the tools, aptitude or time to do so, the class action lawsuit explains. Angelini alleges that TTI's policy violates section 1793.2 of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, which prohibits manufacturers from requiring consumers to repair products themselves while a product is still under warranty. TTI's recall also is inconsistent with general industry practices, Angelini says. It has become common practice for U.S. companies that sell small consumer goods to offer refunds as an alternative to repairs or replacements when products are recalled, the RYOBI class action lawsuit states. Angelini is looking to represent anyone who purchased a RYOBI electric pressure washer for personal, family or household use in one of 26 states within the applicable statute of limitations. He is suing for violations of California's consumer laws, breach of implied warranty and unjust enrichment and seeks certification of the class action lawsuit, damages, fees, costs and a jury trial. Earlier this year, TTI Outdoor Power Equipment was hit with a class action alleging certain RYOBI mowers are prone to overheating and catching fire. The plaintiff is represented by Yeremey O. Krivoshey and Joel D. Smith of Smith Krivoshey P.C. The RYOBI class action lawsuit is Angelini v. TTI Outdoor Power Equipment Inc., Case No. 5:25-cv-02280, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. [GN] ULTA BEAUTY: Leach Files Suit in Fla. Cir. Ct. ---------------------------------------------- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ulta Beauty. The case is styled as Laura Leach, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Ulta Beauty, Case No. 25-005057-CI (Fla. Cir. Ct., Pinellas Cty., Sept. 10, 2025). The case type is stated as "Other Civil - Circuit." Ulta Beauty -- https://www.ulta.com/ -- is a popular outlet for cosmetics and skincare products.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Mitchell D. Hansen, Esq. TROVILLION, INVEISS, DEMAKIS & HANSEN 1450 Frazee Rd., Ste. 310 San Diego, CA 92108-4340 Phone: 619-232-7181 Fax: 619-232-8423 Email: mhansen@tidlaw.com V.F. CORP: Faces Class Action Suit for Misleading Investors ----------------------------------------------------------- A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against V.F. Corporation ("VFC" or the "Company") (NYSE: VFC). The lawsuit alleges that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse information regarding VFC's turnaround plan, Reinvent, including that additional significant reset actions would be necessary to return the Vans brand to growth, resulting in significant setbacks to Vans' revenue growth trajectory which were neither contemplated nor cautioned by Defendants' comments on Reinvent or the Vans turnaround progress, specifically. If you purchased shares of VFC between October 30, 2023 and May 20, 2025, and experienced a significant loss on that investment, you are encouraged to discuss your legal rights by contacting Corey D. Holzer, Esq. at cholzer@holzerlaw.com, by toll-free telephone at (888) 508-6832, or by visiting the firm's website at www.holzerlaw.com/case/vfc/ for more information. The deadline to ask the court to be appointed lead plaintiff in the case is November 12, 2025. Holzer & Holzer, LLC, an ISS top rated securities litigation law firm for 2021, 2022, and 2023, dedicates its practice to vigorous representation of shareholders and investors in litigation nationwide, including shareholder class action and derivative litigation. Since its founding in 2000, Holzer & Holzer attorneys have played critical roles in recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders victimized by fraud and other corporate misconduct. More information about the firm is available through its website, www.holzerlaw.com, and upon request from the firm. Holzer & Holzer, LLC has paid for the dissemination of this promotional communication, and Corey Holzer is the attorney responsible for its content. CONTACT: Corey D. Holzer, Esq. Holzer & Holzer, LLC (888) 508-6832 cholzer@holzerlaw.com [GN] VAN LUU: Murillo Sues Over Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation --------------------------------------------------------------- Luzgardo Murillo, Nestor Andres Guampearias, and Jennry Luis Ramos Guerrero, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated v. VAN LUU, BRENDON LUU, and BNJ GRANITE/CABINETS, LTD., Case No. 2:25-cv-05086 (E.D.N.Y., Sept. 11, 2025), is brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ("FLSA") and New York Labor Law ("NYLL") for willful failure to pay overtime premium compensation to Plaintiffs and other similarly situated workers when working more than forty hours in a workweek. The Defendants maintained several unlawful policies and practices resulting in their failure to pay proper overtime and regular wages including Defendants' "No Overtime Premium Policy," their unlawful "Automatic Deduction Policy," their "Time Shaving Practices," and failure to issue wage statements and notifications or pay rate informing workers of their right to receive overtime when working more than forty hours in a workweek, says the complaint. The Plaintiffs were employed by Defendants as fabricators and installers. The Defendant Van Luu was an owner and operator and President and Chief Executive Officer of Defendant BNJ.[BN] The Plaintiff is represented by: Christopher Marlborough, Esq. THE MARLBOROUGH LAW FIRM, P.C 375 Sunrise Highway, Suite 3 Lynbrook, New York 11563 Phone: (212) 991-8960 Email: chris@marlboroughlawfirm.com - and - Bruce McBrien, Esq. MCBRIEN LAW PC 140 Fell Ct. Hauppauge, NY 11788 Phone: (631) 406-9799 Email: bmcbrien@mcbrienlaw.com VINE HILL: M&A Investigates Merger With CoinShares International ---------------------------------------------------------------- Class Action Attorney Juan Monteverde with Monteverde & Associates PC, a law firm headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City, is investigating Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp. (NASDAQ: VCIC) related to its merger with CoinShares International Limited. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Vine Hill shareholders will receive one share of the newly combined company for each Vine Hill share they own. Is it a fair deal? Visit link for more info https://monteverdelaw.com/case/vine-hill-capital-investment-corp. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you. NOT ALL LAW FIRMS ARE EQUAL. Before you hire a law firm, you should talk to a lawyer and ask: 1. Do you file class actions and go to Court? 2. When was the last time you recovered money for shareholders? 3. What cases did you recover money in and how much? About Monteverde & Associates PC Our firm litigates and has recovered money for shareholders…and we do it from our offices in the Empire State Building. We are a national class action securities firm with a successful track record in trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. No one is above the law. If you own common stock in the above listed company and have concerns or wish to obtain additional information free of charge, please visit our website or contact Juan Monteverde, Esq. either via e-mail at jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com or by telephone at (212) 971-1341. Contact: Juan Monteverde, Esq. MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC The Empire State Building 350 Fifth Ave. Suite 4740 New York, NY 10118 Tel: (212) 971-1341 E-mail: jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com[GN] WARREN TRANSPORT: Beissel Seeks Conditional Status Action --------------------------------------------------------- In the class action lawsuit captioned as ANDREW BEISSEL, v. WARREN TRANSPORT, INC. Case No. 1:24-cv-00090-CJW-MAR (N.D. Iowa), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order as follows: : (1) Conditionally certifying action as a collective action under 29 U.S.C. section 216(b); (2) Issuing Notice to all individuals who contracted to provide delivery services for Warren Transport as delivery drivers between July 2021 and the present, and who were classified as independent contractors, by first class mail, e-mail, and text message; and (3) Directing the Defendant produce a list of the names, last- known mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone numbers for all individuals who worked for the Defendant between July 2021 and the present, and who were classified as independent contractors. The Plaintiff Beissel worked as a delivery driver for the Defendant from December 2021 through October 2023. Warren provides freight delivery services throughout the Midwest. A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Sept 3, 2025, is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=y68Rhp at no extra charge.[CC] The Plaintiff is represented by: Harold Lichten, Esq. Olena Savytska, Esq. LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 729 Boylston St., Suite 2000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 994-5800 Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 E-mail: hlichten@llrlaw.com osavytska@llrlaw.com - and - Nate Willems, Esq. Emily Schott Hood, Esq. RUSH & NICHOLSON, P.L.C. Cedar Rapids, IA 52406 Telephone: (319) 363-5209 Facsimile: (319) 363-6664 E-mail: nate@rushnicholson.com email@rushicholson.com WEBTPA EMPLOYER: Final Approval Hearing in $13.75M Deal Set Nov. 19 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Chloe Gocher of ClassAction.org reports that a $13.75 million settlement will end a consolidated class action lawsuit against WebTPA Employer Services and several health insurance companies over an April 2023 data breach. The WebTPA class action settlement received preliminary approval from the court on August 20, 2025 and covers anyone who was notified by WebTPA Employer Services, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance, Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance or Elevance Health that their personal data may have been compromised in the April 2023 data breach. The court-approved website for the WebTPA data breach settlement can be found at WebTPASettlement.com. Per the official settlement site, WebTPA settlement class members who submit a timely, valid claim form will be able to receive medical information monitoring and either reimbursement up to $5,000 for losses resulting from the data breach or a flat cash payment of $100. Class members who were California residents from April 18 to April 23, 2023 will be able to submit a claim for an additional cash payment of approximately $50, the class action settlement website says. In order to claim loss reimbursement, class members must submit documentation to support each claimed loss. A loss can only be claimed if it has not already been reimbursed or compensated by another source, the site says. Class members can, alternatively, choose to receive a flat cash payment of $100, which does not require the submission of any documentation or proof. This flat payment is mutually exclusive from the loss reimbursement option, and class members can only claim one or the other, the settlement website explains. All cash payments may be subject to adjustment on a pro-rata, or equal-share, basis depending on the total number of valid claims filed. The medical monitoring offered through the settlement is available to all class members and includes two years of CyEx Medical Shield monitoring, which will provide up to $1,000,000 insurance coverage for medical identity theft, medical identity monitoring and real-time alerts. To file a claim form online, class members can visit this page and log in with the class member ID found in their copy of the settlement notice. All WebTPA settlement claim forms must be submitted online or postmarked by November 4, 2025. As part of the settlement, the defendants have also agreed to increase security in their systems and environments to better protect customers' personal information. A hearing is scheduled for November 19, 2025 to determine whether the class action settlement will receive final court approval. Settlement benefits will begin to be distributed to class members only after final approval has been granted and any appeals have been resolved. The WebTPA class action lawsuit claimed that WebTPA, The Hartford, Anthem Blue Cross and Elevance Health failed to properly protect customers' personal data against an April 2023 data breach. [GN] YURI SUSHI: Appeals Judgment in Lin Wage-and-Hour Suit to 2nd Cir. ------------------------------------------------------------------ SOPHIA LIAN is taking an appeal from a court judgment in the lawsuit entitled Tingyao Lin, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Yuri Sushi Inc., et al., Defendants, Case No. 1:18-cv-00528, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. This complaint is brought by Plaintiff Tingyao Lin, on behalf of himself as well as other similarly situated employees against the Defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law and implementing New York Codes, Rules, and Regulations, arising from the Defendants' various willful and unlawful employment policies, patterns and/or practices. On Aug. 20, 2025, Judge George B. Daniels entered judgment against Defendant Sophia Lian, as pertaining to an award of liquidated damages, consistent with the jury's answers to written quest filed by Plaintiffs Tingjia Xie and Tingyao Lin. The appellate case is entitled Lin v. Yuri Sushi Inc., Case No. 25-2165, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed on September 9, 2025. [BN] Plaintiffs-Appellees TINGYAO LIN, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, are represented by: John Troy, Esq. TROY LAW PLLC 41-25 Kissena Boulevard Flushing, NY 11355 Defendant-Appellant SOPHIA LIAN appears pro se. ********* S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O N Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA. Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L. Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors. Copyright 2025. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272. This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the publishers. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed. The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000. *** End of Transmission ***