/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/CAR_Public/240327.mbx               C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, March 27, 2024, Vol. 26, No. 63

                            Headlines

AUTOMATIC DATA: Bid to Extend Class Cert Response in Kiani Granted
CALLON PETROLEUM: Durling Sues Over Breach of Fiduciary Duties
CHANGE HEALTHCARE: Fails to Protect Personal Info, Stump Says
COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL: Walker Sues Over Unprotected Health Info
COLTER ENERGY: Zaarour Sues Over Unpaid Wages

COMMUNITY MOBILE: Wilder Sues Over Nasal Swabbers' Unpaid Wages
CONTINENTAL AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT: Stephan Alleges Tire Price Fixing
DEL MONTE: Class Certification Bid in Vlacich Suit Due August 30
FRIGID FLUID: Robinson Seeks to Recover Operators' Proper Wages
GENERAL MOTORS: Approval of Proposed Class Notice Granted in Part

GOYA FOODS: Bid to Certify Class in Mejias Terminated w/o Prejudice
GPB AUTOMOTIVE PORTFOLIO: Deluca Class Suit Discovery Ongoing
GPB AUTOMOTIVE: Continues to Defend Consolidated Class Suit in NY
GPB AUTOMOTIVE: Continues to Defend Consolidated Kinnie Ma Suit
HOLLEY INC: Court Appoints Retirement System as Lead Plaintiff

HOMEWORKS ENERGY: Renewed Bid for Class Cert. Filing Due July 22
HOMOLOGY MEDICINES: Bid to Dismiss Pizzuto Suit Pending
HOMOLOGY MEDICINES: Continues to Defend Welsh Class Suit
HUDSON EXCESS: Pretrial Management Order Entered in Travelers
HYATT CORP: Class Action & PAGA Settlement Gets Initial Nod

IDAHO: Rossow Seeks to Extend Deadlines for Class Cert Bid
INDIAN HILL: Filing for Class Cert Bid in R.L.K. Extended to May 6
JDC HEALTHCARE: Class Cert Bid Response Extended to April 12
JOHNSON & JOHNSON: Appeals Cert. Ruling in Hall Securities Suit
JP WHITE: Hong Suit Seeks Class Certification Bid Conference

KROGER CO: Seeks to Permanently Seal Portions of Class Cert Bid
LATTER & BLUM: Peiffer Sues Over Real Estate Market Conspiracy
LIGHTFIRE PARTNERS: Alley Must File Reply to Response by April 5
LONG BEACH, NY: Class Cert Bid Filing Extended
LONG BEACH, NY: Class Cert Briefing Sched Extended in Guma

LYONS MAGNUS: Final Approval of Class Settlement Sought in Catalano
MARRIOTT INT'L: Hall Seeks Reconsideration of Class Cert Denial
MARS PETCARE: Plaintiffs' Bids to Seal Granted in Part
MARTINEZ REFINING: Court Amends Scheduling Order in Piscitelli
MDL 3083: MoveIt Data Breach Suits Transferred to D. Mass.

MYTHICAL VENTURE: Hall Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Bid
NEW YORK PAVING: Bid for Reconsideration Denied in Diaz Class Suit
NORTHERN TRUST: Court Extends ADR Deadline Until August 1
NORTHERN TRUST: Parties Seek to Modify Class Cert. Briefing
NVIDIA CORP: Tobias Suit Seeks to Certify Plan Participant Class

OXY USA: Rider Seeks to Certify Class of Stevens Suit Participants
PELICIA HALL: Allowed to File Exhibit Under Seal in Alexander
PENNEY OPCO: Filing for Class Cert Bid in Atkinson Due Nov. 15
PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: Court Amends Class Certification Order
PINNACLE TOO: Plaintiffs Class Cert Reply Extended to March 28

PJ OPERATIONS: Crook FLSA Conditional Cert. Bid Granted in Part
POLARIS INDUSTRIES: Court OK's Class Cert Notice in Guzman Lawsuit
POLICYGENIUS LLC: Bid for Class Cert. in Torres Suit Due August 2
PROCTER & GAMBLE: Mannings Suit Removed to C.D. California
PROGRESS SOFTWARE: Rehm Suit Transferred to D. Massachusetts

PROGRESSIVE DIRECT: Watson Must File Class Cert Reply by April 15
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT: Watson Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Reply
QUALITY TEMPORARY: Class Settlement in Lockridge Gets Initial Nod
RB ROYAL: Conditional Certification Deadline in Bohnert Extended
REALNETWORKS INC: Strougo Sues Over Misleading Proxy Statements

RENTGROW INC: Portions of Summary Judgment Must be Sealed
RICKEYO CONSTRUCTION: Class Cert Notice Granted in Part
ROCKET CO: Shupe Bid to Seal Class Certification Reply OK'd
SBS TRANSPORT: Stokes Must Prove Why Case Shouldn't Be Dismissed
SCISSORTAIL ENERGY: Dinsmore Suit Seeks to Certify Settlement Class

SEAWORLD PARKS: Plaintiffs' Bid for Leave to Amend Granted in Part
SELECT REHAB: Class Cert. Filing in McLauglin Extended to May 17
SERGEANT THOMAS: Stoudemire Files Suit in D. South Carolina
SHEARER'S FOODS: Moore Conditional Cert. Bid OK'd
SPERO THERAPEUTICS: Bid to Dismiss Germond & Memon Suit Pending

STALLION EXPRESS: McCatty Class Suit Seeks Conditional Class Cert.
STATE FARM: Bid for Class Certification in Gulick Due April 26
T.L. CANNON: Must File Application Regarding Sealing of Exhibits
TARGET CORP: Continues to Defend Federal Securities Class Suit
TIOGA DOWNS: Final Approval of Class Settlement Sought in Potter

TRANSAMERICA LIFE: Wollam Loses Bid for Class Certification
TULANE UNIVERSITY: Must Oppose Jones Class Cert Bid by April 16
TULANE UNIVERSITY: Parties Seek to Modify Case Management Schedule
TURTLE BEACH: To File Defense Statement Complaint on April 30
UNION PACIFIC: Court Narrows Claims in Cushman Suit

UNITED BEHAVIORAL: Considers Sealing of Docs in Class Suit
UNITED STATES: Bid to Certify Class Withdrawn w/o Prejudice
UNITED STATES: Davis Files Suit in U.S. Ct. of Fed. Cl.
UNITED STATES: Parties Must Explain Why Discovery Should Be Open
UNITED STATES: Parties Seek to Dismiss Class Suit w/o Prejudice

UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS: Bid to Certify Class of L2L Drivers Tossed
UPFIELD US: Court Concludes All Discovery in Clemmons Action
US PREMIUM BEEF: NBP Continues to Defend Brown Class Suit
VALLEY FIRST: Class Settlement in Ayala Gets Final Nod
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND: Court Narrows Claims in Urella Suit

VISION PATH: Bid for Class Cert. Briefing Schedule Continuance OK'd
WALGREEN CO: Bargetto Seeks to Seal Class Certification Documents
WALGREEN CO: Bargetto Suit Seeks to Certify Bag Purchaser Class
WALMART INC: Rector Suit Removed to D. Columbia
WASHINGTON: Sterling Appeals Reconsideration Order to 9th Circuit

WELLS FARGO: Young Sues Over Deceptive Trade Practices
WHITESTONE HOME: All Fact Discovery in Wilson Suit Due Dec. 18
WINNER INTERNATIONAL: Liz Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
WORLD LINK: Faces Romero Wage-and-Hour Suit in Cal. Super.
XAVIER BECERRA: Lucas Seeks to Modify Class Certification Order

ZILLOW GROUP: Jaeger Suit Seeks to Certify Stock Purchaser Class
[^] Darrow Sponsors 8th Annual Class Action Conference
[^] Davis Wright Sponsors 8th Annual Class Action Conference

                            *********

AUTOMATIC DATA: Bid to Extend Class Cert Response in Kiani Granted
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Amir Kiani, et al., v.
Automatic Data Processing Incorporated, Case No. 4:23-cv-00508-BGM
(D. Ariz.), the Hon. Judge Bruce Macdonald entered an order
granting the Defendant's first unopposed motion to extend
Defendant/Counterclaimant ADP, Inc.'s deadline to respond to the
Plaintiffs' motion to conditionally certify a collective action.

The Court further orders that the Defendant shall have up to and
including March 29, 2024 to file its response to the Plaintiffs'
motion for class certification.

Automatic Data is an American provider of human resources
management software and services.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=F4PYl2 at no extra
charge.[CC]

CALLON PETROLEUM: Durling Sues Over Breach of Fiduciary Duties
--------------------------------------------------------------
WILLIAM DURLING, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. CALLON PETROLEUM COMPANY, JOSEPH C. GATTO,
MATTHEW R. BOB, FRANCES ALDRICH SEVILLA-SACASA, BARBARA
FAULKENBERRY, ANTHONY J. NOCCHIERO, MARY SHAFER-MALICKI, STEVEN A.
WEBSTER, and JAMES E. CRADDOCK, Defendants, Case No. 2024-0203
(Del. Ch., March 4, 2024) is a verified class action complaint
brought by the Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all other
similarly situated public stockholders of Callon Petroleum Company,
against the members of the board of directors of Callon for
breaching their fiduciary duties under the Delaware law.

The Plaintiffs' claims arise in connection with the solicitation of
Callon's public stockholders to, inter alia, vote in favor of a
transaction pursuant to which Callon will merge into an affiliate
of APA Corporation. In connection with the proposed merger, each
share of Callon common stock will be exchanged for a fixed ratio of
1.0425 shares of APA Common Stock, which offers no premium -- and
in fact a negative premium -- to Callon stockholders.

On February 16, 2024, to solicit Callon stockholders to vote for
the Merger at a special meeting to be held on March 27, 2024,
Defendants caused the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A to
be filed by Callon with the Securities and Exchange Commission
under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
mailed to its shareholders.

According to the complaint, the Proxy omitted material facts
necessary for Callon stockholders to cast informed votes at the
Special Meeting with respect to the Merger, including without
limitation, failing to disclose: (i) the premium to the closing
price of Callon Common Stock on December 20, 2023, December 27,
2023, and January 2, 2024, implied by the exchange ratio proposed
by a rival bidder, Company D, which Company D reaffirmed on those
dates; (ii) the basis for the tripling in the projected annual
synergies from the Merger from the $50 million in annual synergies
projected by APA in its proposal dated December 26, 2023, to the
$150 million in annual synergies projected in the Proxy as a factor
supporting approval of the Merger; and (iii) the compensation and
potential conflicts of RBC Capital Markets, LLC in its capacity as
financial advisor to the Board.

Callon Petroleum Company is an independent oil and natural gas
company that focuses on the acquisition, exploration, and
development of oil and natural gas properties in the Permian Basin
in West Texas.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Blake A. Bennett, Esq.
          COOCH AND TAYLOR, P.A.
          1000 N. West St., Suite 1500
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Telephone: (302) 984-388

               - and -

          Juan E. Monteverde, Esq.
          MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC
          The Empire State Building
          350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4740
          New York, NY 10118

               - and -

          Joshua E. Fruchter, Esq.
          WOHL & FRUCHTER LLP
          25 Robert Pitt Drive Suite 209G
          Monsey, NY 10952

CHANGE HEALTHCARE: Fails to Protect Personal Info, Stump Says
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jennifer Stump, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. Change Healthcare, Inc., Defendant, Case No.
3:24-cv-00255 (M.D. Tenn., March 5, 2024) is a class action arising
from the recent cyberattack and data breach resulting from Change's
failure to implement reasonable and industry standard data security
practices.

According to the complaint, the Plaintiff's and Class Members'
sensitive personal information -- which they entrusted to Defendant
on the mutual understanding that Defendant would protect it against
disclosure -- was compromised and unlawfully accessed due to the
data breach. The private information compromised in the data breach
included Plaintiff's and Class Members' "personally identifiable
information" and medical information, which is protected health
information, as defined by the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996.

As a result of the Data Breach, Plaintiff and Class Members have
been exposed to a heightened and imminent risk of fraud and
identity theft. The Plaintiff and Class Members must now and in the
future closely monitor their financial accounts to guard against
identity theft, says the suit.

Change Healthcare, Inc. is a healthcare company that provides
payment and revenue cycle services, clinical and imaging services,
and other services to its clients.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          J. Gerard Stranch, IV, Esq.
          Michael Iadevaia, Esq.
          Emily Schiller, Esq.
          STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC
          223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200
          Nashville, TN 37203
          Telephone: (615) 254-8801
          E-mail: gstranch@stranchlaw.com
                  miadevaia@stranchlaw.com
                  eschiller@stranchlaw.com

               - and -

          Lynn A. Toops, Esq.
          COHEN & MALAD, LLP
          One Indiana Square, Suite 1400
          Indianapolis, IN 46204
          Telephone: (317) 636-6481
          E-mail: ltoops@cohenandmalad.com

               - and -

          Samuel J. Strauss, Esq.
          Raina Borrelli, Esq.
          TURKE & STRAUSS LLP
          613 Williamson Street, Suite 201 
          Madison, WI 53703 
          Telephone: (608) 237-1775 
          Facsimile: (608) 509-4423 
          E-mail: sam@turkestrauss.com
                   raina@turkestrauss.com

COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL: Walker Sues Over Unprotected Health Info
--------------------------------------------------------------
SARAH WALKER, as Next Friend of I.W., a Minor, on behalf of
themself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. COLEMAN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant, Case No. 5:24-cv-00419
(N.D. Ohio, March 5, 2024) seeks monetary damages and injunctive
and declaratory relief arising from Defendant's failure to
safeguard the personally identifiable information and protected
health information of its patients, which resulted in unauthorized
access to its information systems between September 18, 2023, and
October 31, 2023, and the compromised and unauthorized disclosure
of that private information, causing widespread injury and damages
to Plaintiff and the proposed members.

Defendant Coleman detected unusual activity in its computer systems
and ultimately determined that an unauthorized third party accessed
its employees' email accounts and obtained certain files contained
within between September 18, 2023, and October 31, 2023. As a
result of the data breach, which Coleman failed to prevent, the
private information of Defendant's patients, including Plaintiff
and the proposed Class members, were stolen, including their name,
treatment/diagnosis information, patient identification numbers,
and health insurance/payment information, says the suit.

On behalf of themself and the Class, the Plaintiff brings causes of
action against Defendant for negligence, negligence per se, breach
of fiduciary duty, and breach of implied contract, seeking an award
of monetary damages and injunctive and declaratory relief,
resulting from Defendant's failure to adequately protect their
highly sensitive private information, the suit alleges.

Coleman Professional Services, Inc., is a nonprofit community
behavioral health agency, incorporated in Ohio.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Andrew J. Shamis, Esq.
          SHAMIS & GENTILE P.A.
          14 NE 1st Ave., Suite 705
          Miami, FL 33132
          Telephone: (305) 479-2299
          E-mail: ashamis@shamisgentile.com

COLTER ENERGY: Zaarour Sues Over Unpaid Wages
---------------------------------------------
ADHAM ZAAROUR, individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. COLTER ENERGY SERVICES USA INC., Defendant,
Case No. 2:24-cv-00443 (D. Nev., March 5, 2024) is a collective
action to recover Plaintiff's unpaid overtime wages, liquidated
damages, and attorneys' fees and costs due and owing against
Defendant under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

According to the complaint, Zaarour and the Putative Collective
Members regularly work over 40 hours per week for Colter, but are
not paid for all the hours they work each week at the appropriate
overtime rate of pay.

Plaintiff Zaarour has been employed by Colter as a night
supervisor/night operator since approximately October 2018.

Colter Energy Services USA Inc. provides services in the oil and
gas industry, including production testing, fracking services, and
others, in various states, including Colorado, Wyoming, North
Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Esther C. Rodriguez, Esq.
          RODRIGUEZ LAW OFFICES, P.C.
          10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
          Las Vegas, NV 89145
          Telephone: (702) 320-8400
          Facsimile: (702) 320-8401
          E-mail: esther@rodriguezlaw.com

               - and -

          Richard J. (Rex) Burch, Esq.
          BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC
          11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 3025
          Houston, TX 77046
          Telephone: (713) 877-8788
          E-mail: rburch@brucknerburch.com

               - and -

          Michael A. Josephson, Esq.
          Andrew W. Dunlap, Esq.
          William M. Hogg, Esq.
          JOSEPHSON DUNLAP LLP  
          11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 3050
          Houston, TX 77046
          Telephone: (713) 352-1100
          Facsimile: (713) 352-3300
          E-mail: mjosephson@mybackwages.com
                  adunlap@mybackwages.com
                  whogg@mybackwages.com

COMMUNITY MOBILE: Wilder Sues Over Nasal Swabbers' Unpaid Wages
---------------------------------------------------------------
JIHAN WILDER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. COMMUNITY MOBILE TESTING, INC., and LABQ
DIAGNOSTICS, LLC, Defendants, Case No. 1:24-cv-01665 (S.D.N.Y.,
March 5, 2024) seeks to recover overtime wages, agreed upon wages,
and underpayment caused by untimely wage payments and other damages
for Plaintiff and similarly situated under the Fair Labor Standards
Act and the New York Labor Law, and to recover damages for
discrimination based upon creed/religion retaliation under the New
York City Human Rights Law.

Plaintiff Wilder was employed by Defendants as a nasal swabber, an
Hourly Worker, in Manhattan, New York earning approximately $19.00
per hour from in or around January 2022 through May 2022.

Community Mobile Testing, Inc. is a medical facility handling COVID
vaccines.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brian S. Schaffer, Esq.
          Frank J. Mazzaferro, Esq.
          FITAPELLI & SCHAFFER, LLP
          28 Liberty Street, 30th Floor
          New York, NY 10005
          Telephone: (212) 300-0375

CONTINENTAL AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT: Stephan Alleges Tire Price Fixing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NANCY STEPHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. CONTINENTAL AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; CONTINENTAL
TIRE THE AMERICAS, LLC; COMPAGNIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS
MICHELIN; MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.; NOKIAN TYRES PLC; NOKIAN
TYRES INC; NOKIAN TYRES U.S. OPERATIONS LLC; THE GOODYEAR TIRE &
RUBBER COMPANY; PIRELLI & C. S.P.A.; PIRELLI TIRE LLC; BRIDGESTONE
CORPORATION; BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC.; and DOES 1-100,
Defendants, Case No. 5:24-cv-00408 (N.D. Ohio, March 4, 2024) is a
class action for damages and injunctive relief against Defendants
for violations of Sections 1 and 3 of the Sherman Act and for
unjust enrichment.

This case arises from a conspiracy among the largest tire
manufacturers in the world to fix the prices of new replacement
tires for passenger cars, vans, trucks and buses sold in the United
States. The Defendants' anticompetitive and unlawful conduct has
proximately caused injury to Plaintiff and members of the Class by
restraining competition and thereby raising, maintaining and/or
stabilizing the price of Tires at levels above the prices that
would have prevailed in a competitive market, says the suit.

Plaintiff Stephan purchased Tires directly from Defendant
Bridgestone during the Class Period and allegedly paid an
artificially high price for her Tires.

Continental Aktiengesellschaft is headquartered in Germany and has
four group sectors: Automotive, Tires, ContiTech, and Contract
Manufacturing.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Walter W. Noss, Esq.
          Christopher M. Burke, Esq.
          Yifan (Kate) Lv, Esq.
          KOREIN TILLERY P.C.
          707 Broadway, Suite 1410
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 625-5620
          Facsimile: (314) 241-3525
          E-mail: wnoss@koreintillery.com
                  cburke@koreintillery.com
                  klv@koreintillery.com

               - and -

          Vincent Briganti, Esq.
          Raymond Girnys, Esq.
          Roland St. Louis, Esq.
          Nicole A. Veno, Esq.
          Claire Noelle Forde, Esq.
          LOWEY DANNENBERG, P.C.
          44 South Broadway, Suite 1100  
          White Plains, NY 10601
          Telephone: (914) 997-0500
          Facsimile: (914) 997-0035
          E-mail: vbriganti@lowey.com
                  rgirnys@lowey.com
                  rstlouis@lowey.com
                  nveno@lowey.com
                  nforde@lowey.com

DEL MONTE: Class Certification Bid in Vlacich Suit Due August 30
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Jennifer Vlacich, Brenda
Robert, Elena Nacarino, Ana Krstic, Christina Vink, Lora Grodnick,
Lisa Malara, and Teena Stambaugh, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, v. Del Monte Foods, Inc., Foods, Inc.,
Case No. 4:22-cv-00892-JST (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Jon Tigar
entered an order approving joint stipulation to reset class
certification schedule as follows:

                       Event                     Deadline

  Class certification motion and               Aug. 30, 2024
  Plaintiffs' class certification
  expert disclosures due

  Class certification opposition and           Oct. 30, 2024
  Defendants' class certification expert
  disclosures due

  Class certification expert discovery         Nov. 21, 2024
  cut-off

  Class certification reply due                Dec. 5, 2024

Del Monte is an American food production and distribution company.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=F61h0Z at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jonas B. Jacobson, Esq.
          Simon Franzini, Esq.
          DOVEL & LUNER, LLP
          201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600
          Santa Monica, CA 90401
          Telephone: (310) 656-7066
          Facsimile: (310) 656-7069
          E-mail: jonas@dovel.com
                  simon@dovel.com

                - and -

          Zack Broslavsky, Esq.
          BROSLAVSKY & WEINMAN, LLP
          1500 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 500
          Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
          Telephone: (310) 575-2550
          Facsimile: (310) 464-3550
          E-mail: zbroslavsky@bwcounsel.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Erik K. Swanholt, Esq.
          Kelsey C. Boehm, Esq.
          FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
          555 South Flower Street, Suite 3300
          Los Angeles, CA 90071-2418
          Telephone: (213) 972-4500
          Facsimile: (213) 486-0065
          E-mail: eswanholt@foley.com
                  kboehm@foley.com

FRIGID FLUID: Robinson Seeks to Recover Operators' Proper Wages
---------------------------------------------------------------
BRENTON ROBINSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. FRIGID FLUID COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Case
No. 1:24-cv-01829 (N.D. Ill., March 4, 2024) seeks relief under the
Fair Labor Standards Act, Illinois' Minimum Wage Law, and Illinois'
Wage Payment and Collection Act for unpaid overtime compensation,
unpaid straight time (regular) and/or agreed upon wages, liquidated
damages, attorneys' fees, declaratory and/or injunctive relief,
and/or any such other relief the Court may deem appropriate.

According to the complaint, the Defendant operated an unlawful
compensation system that deprived and failed to compensate
Plaintiff and all other current and former hourly-paid, non-exempt
employees for all hours worked and work performed each workweek,
including at an overtime rate of pay for each hour worked in excess
of 40 hours in a workweek, by shaving time (via timeclock rounding)
from Plaintiff's and all other hourly-paid, non-exempt employees'
weekly timesheets for pre-shift and post-shift hours worked and/or
work performed, to the detriment of said employees and to the
benefit of Defendant.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant as an hourly-paid,
non-exempt employee in the position of Operator working at
Defendant's Northlake, Illinois location from January 2023 to
November 2023.

Frigid Fluid Company, Inc. is an embalming fluid manufacturer doing
business in the State of Illinois.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          James A. Walcheske, Esq.
          Scott S. Luzi, Esq.
          David M. Potteiger, Esq.
          WALCHESKE & LUZI, LLC
          125 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 300
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Telephone: (224) 698-2630
          Facsimile: (262) 565-6469
          E-mail: jwalcheske@walcheskeluzi.com
                  sluzi@walcheskeluzi.com
                  dpotteiger@walcheskeluzi.com

GENERAL MOTORS: Approval of Proposed Class Notice Granted in Part
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as RILLA JEFFERSON, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated, v. GENERAL MOTORS,
LLC, Case No. 2:20-cv-02576-JPM-tmp (W.D. Tenn.), the Hon. Judge
Jon McCalla entered an order granting in part and denying in part
the Plaintiff's motion for approval of proposed class notice and
notice Plan.

The Plaintiff's motion is granted as to the Notice and Notice Plan
but denied as to the request to order Defendant to produce
additional Class Member information. The Defendant's renewed
request for a stay is denied.

The Court also amends the Third Amended Schedule as follows:

  1. The joint proposed pretrial order, proposed verdict form,
     proposed jury instructions, proposed voir dire questions, and

     motions in limine are due by no later than 4:30 p.m. on Sept.
13,
     2024.

  2. A pretrial conference is set for Friday, Oct. 4, 2024 at 9:30

     a.m.

  3. The jury trial in this matter, which is anticipated to last
7–10
     days, is set to begin on Oct. 21, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. in a
     courtroom to be designated by the District Court courtroom
     sharing plan.

The Plaintiff alleges that she began to experience a Shift-to-Park
("STP") defect shortly after she purchased the subject vehicle.

The Plaintiff asserts that GM "is well aware of the [STP] defect."
She
describes the defect as "a safety risk" as it can drain a car
battery. The Plaintiff brings claims for breach of contract, breach
of express warranty, and breach of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.

On May 11, 2023, the Court granted the Plaintiff's motion to
certify class.

The Court defined the class as follows:

   "Initial purchasers and lessees of new class vehicles, 2017-18
GMC
   Acadias, who purchased or leased their vehicles in Tennessee and

   who:
   (1) experienced the STP condition during the warranty term;

   (2) sought a repair for the STP condition from a GM dealer
during
       the warranty term; and

   (3) were not provided a redesigned silicon-free part free at no

       cost during the warranty term.

The Plaintiff purchased a new 2017 GMC Acadia for $30,270 from
Sunrise Buick in Bartlett, Tennessee on October 25, 2017. The
Subject Vehicle was sold with GM's "New Vehicle Limited Warranty,"
providing
"repair and replace" coverage for 3 years or 36,000 miles,
whichever comes first.

General Motors markets, manufactures, sells, and provides a limited

warranty for motor vehicles, including the GMC Acadia.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 13, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=67CzzO at no extra
charge.[CC]

GOYA FOODS: Bid to Certify Class in Mejias Terminated w/o Prejudice
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MEJIAS et al v. GOYA
FOODS, INC. et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-12365 (D.N.J., Filed Sept. 4,
2020), the Hon. Judge Brian R. Martinotti entered an order
terminating the motion to certify class administratively terminated
without prejudice.

In the event the matter does not resolve, the plaintiff may ask the
court to reopen the motion.

The nature of suit other labor litigation.[CC]

GPB AUTOMOTIVE PORTFOLIO: Deluca Class Suit Discovery Ongoing
-------------------------------------------------------------
GPB Automotive Portfolio LP disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for
the fiscal period ending December 31, 2024 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2024, that
discovery is ongoing for Deluca class suit in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York.

In November 2019, plaintiffs filed a putative class action
complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York against GPB, GPB Holdings II, LP, the
Partnership, David Gentile, Jeffery Lash, AAS, Axiom, Jeffry
Schneider, Mark Martino, and Ascendant.

The Complaint alleges fraud and material omissions and
misrepresentations to induce investment and losses in excess of
$1.27 billion.

The plaintiffs are seeking disgorgement, compensatory,
consequential, and general damages; disgorgement; rescission;
restitution; punitive damages; and the establishment of a
constructive trust.

While the parties to the action stipulated in 2021 to stay this
action pending resolution of the criminal case against defendants
David Gentile and Jeffry Schneider, the Court nevertheless ordered
the stay lifted as to the so-called "Auditor Defendants" in January
2023.

In September 2023, the Court denied a motion by the Auditor
Defendants to stay the case, and instead has directed that certain
discovery continue in the case.

Any potential losses associated with this matter cannot be
estimated at this time.

GPB Capital Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
and
registered investment adviser, is the Partnership's General
Partner
pursuant to the terms of the Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement
of Limited Partnership, pursuant of which, GPB conducts and
manages
its businesses. It owned and operated multiple retail automotive
dealerships, including in most cases their related real estate.



GPB AUTOMOTIVE: Continues to Defend Consolidated Class Suit in NY
-----------------------------------------------------------------
GPB Automotive Portfolio LP disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for
the fiscal period ending December 31, 2024 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2024, that the
Company continues to defend itself from consolidated class suit in
New York Supreme Court.

In May 2020, plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint
in New York Supreme Court, New York County against GPB, GPB
Holdings, GPB Holdings II, GPB Holdings III, the Partnership, GPB
Cold Storage, GPB Waste Management, David Gentile, Jeffrey Lash,
Macrina Kgil, a/k/a Minchung Kgil, William Edward Jacoby, Scott
Naugle, Jeffry Schneider, AAS, Ascendant, and Axiom Capital
Management.

The Complaint alleges, among other things, that the offering
documents for certain GPB-managed funds, include material
misstatements and omissions.

The plaintiffs are seeking disgorgement, unspecified damages, and
other equitable relief.

Any potential losses associated with this matter cannot be
estimated at this time.

GPB Capital Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
and
registered investment adviser, is the Partnership's General
Partner
pursuant to the terms of the Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement
of Limited Partnership, pursuant of which, GPB conducts and
manages
its businesses. It owned and operated multiple retail automotive
dealerships, including in most cases their related real estate.



GPB AUTOMOTIVE: Continues to Defend Consolidated Kinnie Ma Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
GPB Automotive Portfolio LP disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for
the fiscal period ending December 31, 2024 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2024, that the
Company continues to defend itself from consolidated Kinnie Ma
Individual Retirement Account class suit in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Texas.

In October 2019, plaintiffs filed a putative class action in the
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
against GPB, certain GPB-managed limited partnerships, including
the Partnership, for which GPB is the General Partner, AAS, and
Ascendant, as well as certain principals of the GPB-managed limited
partnerships, auditors, broker-dealers, a fund administrator, and
other individuals.

The Complaint alleges violations and/or aiding and abetting
violations of the Texas Securities Act, fraud, substantial
assistance in the commission of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty,
substantial assistance in breach of fiduciary duty, and negligence.


Plaintiffs allege losses in excess of $1.8 billion and are seeking
compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, rescission, fees and
costs, and class certification.

Any potential losses associated with this matter cannot be
estimated at this time.

On June 1, 2022, the Western District of Texas Court consolidated
this matter with Barasch v. GPB Capital, et al. (19-cv-01079); only
the Kinnie Ma case continues, including the claims at issue in the
Barasch v. GPB Capital matter and Loretta Dehay (as described
below), which were consolidated under the Kinnie Ma docket number.


On June 23, 2022, the Court denied Defendants David Gentile and
Jeffry Schneider's motion to stay the case pending the resolution
of the criminal case, U.S. v. Gentile, et al., No. 1:21-CR-54-DG
(E.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2021).

Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on July 1, 2022, and
defendants filed answers thereafter.

On August 21, 2023, the Court granted the indicted defendants' May
2023 motion to stay proceedings pending resolution of the related
criminal case.

Plaintiffs have filed their objection to and appeal of the
Court’s decision.

GPB Capital Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
and
registered investment adviser, is the Partnership's General
Partner
pursuant to the terms of the Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement
of Limited Partnership, pursuant of which, GPB conducts and
manages
its businesses. It owned and operated multiple retail automotive
dealerships, including in most cases their related real estate.

HOLLEY INC: Court Appoints Retirement System as Lead Plaintiff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Greg N. Stivers of the U.S. District Court for the Western
District of Kentucky, Bowling Green Division, grants the
Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and for
Approval of Selection of Lead Counsel in the lawsuit entitled CITY
OF FORT LAUDERDALE GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf
of itself and all others similarly situated, PLAINTIFF v. HOLLEY
INC. f/k/a EMPOWER LTD., et al., DEFENDANTS, Case No.
1:23-cv-00148-GNS (W.D. Ky.).

Plaintiff City of Fort Lauderdale General Employees' Retirement
System filed this putative class action on behalf of itself and all
others similarly situated under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 against Defendants Holley Inc. f/k/a Empower
Ltd., Tom Tomlinson, and Dominic Bardos. Because the Defendants
allegedly engaged in wrongful acts and omissions that resulted in
the decline in the value of Holley's securities, the Retirement
System claims that it and other class members suffered losses and
damages.

Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 78u-4(a)(3)(A)(i), counsel for the
Retirement System published a notice of this putative class action
on Globe Newswire, a national business-oriented wire service, on
Nov. 6, 2023, which notice informed any purported class member of
the opportunity to request to serve as lead plaintiff and provided
contact information for the Retirement System's counsel.

Before the statutory deadline of Jan. 5, 2024, the Retirement
System moved for appointment of lead plaintiff and lead counsel in
this action.

The Retirement System is the only plaintiff in this action, and no
other person or entity, who is a member of the proposed class has
requested appointment as lead plaintiff by the statutory deadline
of Jan. 5, 2024. The Retirement System represents that it has
financial losses of more than $452,000 arising from the Defendants'
alleged violations of federal securities laws after it purchased
67,836 shares of Holley securities in the class period of July 21,
2021, to Feb. 6, 2023. Its counsel also represents that the
Retirement System has a larger financial interest than any other
potential plaintiff.

Judge Stivers holds that these facts support the determination that
the Retirement System is the presumptive lead plaintiff.

The Court must also determine whether the Retirement System
satisfies the typicality and adequacy requirements of Fed. R. Civ.
P. 23(a).

In this instance, Judge Stivers finds the Retirement System has
made a prima facie showing that it satisfies both requirements. Its
claims against the Defendants are typical of the class members
because all such claims involve the purchase of Holley securities
during the class period at allegedly artificially inflated prices
and for which the class members incurred losses.

Judge Stivers also finds that the Retirement System has also shown
that it is adequate to represent the proposed class because it is a
public pension fund, which is a sophisticated institutional advisor
and has served as a fiduciary. There do not appear to be any unique
defenses that would prevent the Retirement System from representing
the proposed class as lead plaintiff.

Because the Retirement System filed this action, has the largest
financial interest in this action, and appears to satisfy the
typicality and adequacy requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a),
Judge Stivers says the Retirement System is presumptively the most
adequate lead plaintiff. No person or entity has attempted to rebut
the presumption that the Retirement System should serve in this
role. Accordingly, the motion is granted.

For these reasons, the Court rules that:

   1. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and
      for Approval of Selection of Lead Counsel is granted;

   2. Plaintiff City of Fort Lauderdale General Employees'
      Retirement System is appointed as Lead Plaintiff for the
      class pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 78u-4(a)(3)(B); and

   3. Plaintiff City of Fort Lauderdale General Employees'
      Retirement System's selection of Robbins Geller Rudman &
      Dowd LLP as Lead Counsel is approved, pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
      Section 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v). Lead Counsel will have the
      following responsibilities and duties on behalf of the Lead
      Plaintiff and the putative class:

      a. briefing and arguing any and all motions;

      b. conducting any and all discovery including taking
         depositions;

      c. engaging in settlement negotiations;

      d. preparing for and participating in pretrial discovery
         proceedings, trial preparations, and the trial,
         including delegating work responsibilities to selected
         counsel as may be required;

      e. drafting and filing of all pleadings; and

      f. supervising all other matters relating to the
         prosecution or resolution of this action.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
Feb. 26, 2024, is available at https://tinyurl.com/9dhv79k5 from
PacerMonitor.com.


HOMEWORKS ENERGY: Renewed Bid for Class Cert. Filing Due July 22
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Giguere v. Homeworks
Energy, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:21-cv-30015 (D. Mass., Filed Feb 5,
2021), the Hon. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni entered an order adopting
the parties' joint proposal regarding the deposition of Dr. Fox and
the filing of Plaintiff's renewed motion for class certification:

-- The Defendants shall depose Dr. Fox by:          April 22,
2024

-- The Defendants shall designate and               May 22, 2024
    disclosure their expert by:

-- The Plaintiff shall depose Defendants            June 21, 2024
    expert by:

-- The Plaintiff shall file a renewed               July 22, 2024
    motion for class certification by:

-- The Defendants shall file an                     Aug. 21, 2024
    opposition by:

-- Plaintiff may file a reply no later than 14 days after the
    Defendants file an opposition.

The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.[CC]

HOMOLOGY MEDICINES: Bid to Dismiss Pizzuto Suit Pending
-------------------------------------------------------
Homology Medicines Inc. disclosed in its Form 8-K Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2024 that
Pizzuto class suit dismissal motion remains pending in the District
of Massachusetts.

On March 4, 2024, the Massachusetts court held oral argument on the
Company's motion to dismiss, which remains pending.

On March 25, 2022, a stockholder of Homology, Michael C. Pizzuto,
filed a putative class action complaint alleging violations of
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, against Homology and certain of its executives.
Pizzuto v. Homology Medicines, Inc., No. 2:22– CV – 01968 (C.D.
Cal 2022).

The complaint alleges that Homology failed to disclose certain
information regarding efficacy and safety in connection with a
Phase I/II HMI-102 clinical trial, and seeks damages in an
unspecified amount.

The case is in its early stages.

Homology believes the claims alleged lack merit and has filed a
motion to transfer venue (filed September 2, 2022) and a motion to
dismiss (filed October 17, 2022).

On April 18, 2023, the court granted the motion to transfer,
finding that venue was not proper in the Central District of
California and transferring the case to the District of
Massachusetts.

Following the transfer, the case number changed to 1:23-cv-10858-AK
(D. Mass.).

On May 9, 2023, the Massachusetts court issued an order permitting
the parties to submit updated briefs in connection with the motion
to dismiss, which were submitted on June 8, 2023, July 13, 2023,
and August 3, 2023.

The motion to dismiss remains pending.

On March 4, 2024, the Massachusetts court held oral argument on the
Company’s motion to dismiss, which remains pending.

As the outcome is not presently determinable, any loss is neither
probable nor reasonably estimable.

Homology Medicines, Inc. is a clinical-stage genetic medicines
company dedicated to transforming the lives of patients suffering
from rare diseases by addressing the underlying cause of the
disease with one-time gene therapy and gene editing treatments.
The company was founded in March 2015 as a Delaware corporation
with its principal offices are in Bedford, Massachusetts.




HOMOLOGY MEDICINES: Continues to Defend Welsh Class Suit
--------------------------------------------------------
Homology Medicines Inc.  disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for the
fiscal period ending December 31, 2023 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2024 that the Company
continues to defend itself from the Welsh class suit.

On February 22, 2024, a purported stockholder of the Company, Kevin
Welsh, filed a putative class action complaint against the Company
and its directors related to the Company's proposed Merger with
Q32, alleging violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Welsh v. Homology Medicines, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00242 (D. Del.).

The complaint alleges that the Company and its directors filed a
proxy statement containing material omissions regarding financial
forecasts and their respective analysis, and seeks damages in an
unspecified amount.

The case is in its early stages.

The Company believes the claims alleged lack merit.

Homology Medicines, Inc. is a clinical-stage genetic medicines
company dedicated to transforming the lives of patients suffering
from rare diseases by addressing the underlying cause of the
disease with one-time gene therapy and gene editing treatments.
The company was founded in March 2015 as a Delaware corporation
with its principal offices are in Bedford, Massachusetts.


HUDSON EXCESS: Pretrial Management Order Entered in Travelers
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, v. HUDSON EXCESS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
Case No. 1:24-cv-01523-DEH-BCM (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Barbara
Moses entered an order regarding general pretrial management
order:

-- All pretrial motions and applications, including those related
to
    scheduling and discovery (but excluding motions to dismiss or
for
    judgment on the pleadings, for injunctive relief, for summary
    judgment, or for class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23)

    must be made to Judge Moses and in compliance with this Court's

    Individual Practices in Civil Cases, available on the Court's
    website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-barbara-moses.

-- Once a discovery schedule has been issued, all discovery must
be
    initiated in time to be concluded by the close of discovery set
by
    the Court.

-- Discovery applications, including letter-motions requesting
    discovery conferences, must be made promptly after the need for

    such an application arises and must comply with Local Civil
Rule
    37.2 and section 2(b) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices.

-- For motions other than discovery motions, pre-motion
conferences
    are not required, but may be requested where counsel believe
that
    an informal conference with the Court may obviate the need for
a
    motion or narrow the issues.

Hudson Excess offers property and casualty insurance products.

A copy of the Court's order dated Mar. 8, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=8UQXDh at no extra
charge.[CC]

HYATT CORP: Class Action & PAGA Settlement Gets Initial Nod
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JANICE INSIXIENGMAY,
individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
employees, v. HYATT CORPORATION DBA HYATT REGENCY SACRAMENTO, a
Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Case No.
2:18-cv-02993-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Troy Nunley
entered an order granting the plaintiff's motion for preliminary
approval of class action and PAGA settlement.

The Court grants Plaintiff's Motion and sets a final approval
hearing on Sept. 19, 2024, with briefs and supporting documentation
to be submitted according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
in this Department.

The Court finds that certification of the following class for
settlement purposes only is appropriate under Rule 23(b)(3) and
23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and related case law:


All non-exempt employees who are currently or were formerly
employed by Defendant at the Hyatt Regency in Sacramento,
California between
October 4, 2014, and June 1, 2023.

The Court also finds that preliminarily and conditionally
certifying the settlement class is required to avoid each Class
Member from litigating similar claims individually. This Settlement
will achieve economies of scale for Class Members with relatively
small individual claims and conserve the resources of the judicial
system.

The Plaintiff filed this putative class action on October 4, 2018.
The operative Complaint alleges that failed to pay overtime, failed
to provide meal periods of premiums in lieu thereof, failed to
provide rest periods or premiums in lieu thereof, failed to provide
accurate wage statements, failed to timely pay final wages, and
engaged in unfair competition.

Hyatt is an American multinational hospitality company.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=HqbltO at no extra
charge.[CC]

IDAHO: Rossow Seeks to Extend Deadlines for Class Cert Bid
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as KEEVA ROSSOW, v. DAVE
JEPPESEN, Director, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, in his
official capacity, Case No. 1:23-cv-00131-BLW (D. Idaho), the
Plaintiff moves the Court to enter an order modifying the
scheduling order to extend the deadline to move for class
certification from April 3, 2024 through and until a date to be
determined by the Court upon consideration of the parties' current
discovery dispute, but no less than 90 days from the date of this
motion, and to also extend accordingly the deadlines for opposing
and replying to a motion for class certification.

Idaho Department of Health and Welfare provides healthcare
services, records management, children and family services, food
assistance programs, and healthcare services.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 13, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=BlWgi9 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Richard A. Hearn, Esq.
          John B. Ingelstrom, Esq.
          HEARN LAW, PLC
          151 N. 3rd Ave., Ste. 100
          Pocatello, ID 83204
          Telephone: (208) 904-0004
          Facsimile: (208) 904-1816
          E-mail: hearn@hearnlawyers.com
                  jbi@hearnlawyers.com

                - and -

          Emily Macmaster, Esq.
          MACMASTER LAW, PLLC
          3363 N. Lakeharbor Lane
          Boise, ID 83703
          Telephone: (208) 608-2235
          E-mail: emily@macmasterlaw.com
                  emacmaster07@gmail.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Brian Church, Esq.
          STATE OF IDAHO
          OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
          Boise, ID 83720-0010
          Facsimile: (208) 854-8073
          E-mail: brian.church@ag.idaho.gov

INDIAN HILL: Filing for Class Cert Bid in R.L.K. Extended to May 6
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as R.L.K. v. Indian Hill
Exempted Village School District, Case No. 1:23-cv-00171 (S.D.
Ohio, Filed March 26, 2023), the Hon. Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins
entered an order on motion for extension of time to complete
discovery:

-- The parties' deadline to supplement their        April 1, 2024
    discovery responses is extended to:

-- The Plaintiff's deadline to submit a             May 6, 2024
    motion for class certification is
    extended to:

-- The Defendant's deadline to respond to           June 5, 2024
    Plaintiff's motion for class
    certification is extended to:

-- The Plaintiff's deadline to file a reply         June 20, 2024
    is extended to:

The nature of suit states American with Disabilities Act.

The Indian Hill Exempted Village School District is a public school
district in Indian Hill, Ohio, a suburb of Cincinnati, Ohio.[CC]

JDC HEALTHCARE: Class Cert Bid Response Extended to April 12
------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Lee v. JDC Healthcare
PLLC, Case No. 3:23-cv-01134 (N.D. Tex., Filed May 17, 2023), the
Hon. Judge Ada Brown entered an order granting joint motion to
extend time as follows:

-- The date for Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for
Class
    Certification is extended to April 12, 2024.

-- Designation of Expert(s) by Defendant is due April 11, 2024.

-- Rebuttal Expert(s) is due May 2, 2024.

-- Challenges to Experts is due July 1, 2024 deadline.

The nature of suit states Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.

JDC provides health care services.[CC]

JOHNSON & JOHNSON: Appeals Cert. Ruling in Hall Securities Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
Johnson & Johnson, et al., took an appeal from the District Court's
Order dated December 29, 2023 entered in the lawsuit styled FRANK
HALL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-01833-ZNQ-TJB, in
the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

The suit, filed on February 8, 2018, seeks to recover compensable
damages caused by violations of the federal securities laws and to
pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

Johnson and Johnson talc products, such as its Baby Powder,
allegedly include asbestos fibers and that the exposure to those
fibers can cause ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. On this news,
shares of Johnson and Johnson fell $7.29 per share or over 5% from
its previous closing price to close at $130.39 per share on
February 5, 2018, damaging investors, including the Plaintiff.

As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter, the Hon. Judge
Zahid N. Quraishi entered an Order on December 29, 2023, granting a
motion for class certification. The court certified the class
defined as "All persons who purchased or otherwise acquired
publicly traded J&J equity securities, as defined in 15 U.S.C.
Section 78c(11) and 17 C.F.R. section 240.3a11-1, between February
22, 2013 and December 13, 2018." The following will be excluded
from the class: defendants, present or former executive officers of
defendants and members of their immediate families, present or
former directors of defendants and members of their immediate
families, any entity in which a defendant has a controlling
interest, and the legal representatives, heirs, successors or
assigns of any such excluded party.

The new appellate case is captioned as San Diego County Employees
Retirement Association, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., Case
No. 24-1409, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit, filed on March 5, 2024.[BN]

Defendants-Petitioners JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., are represented
by:

          Jack N. Frost, Jr., Esq.
          FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH
          600 Campus Drive
          Florham Park, NJ 07932
          Telephone: (973) 549-7338

Plaintiffs-Respondents SAN DIEGO CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
and FRANK HALL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, are represented by:

          James E. Cecchi, Esq.
          Kevin G. Cooper, Esq.
          Donald A. Ecklund, Esq.
          CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO
          5 Becker Farm Road
          Roseland, NJ 07068
          Telephone: (973) 994-1700

JP WHITE: Hong Suit Seeks Class Certification Bid Conference
------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Hong v. JP White Plains,
Inc. et al., Case No. 7:19-cv-05018-NSR-AEK (S.D.N.Y.), the
Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order granting a pre-motion
conference for their anticipated motion for class certification
motion that they plan on filing.

At the conference, Plaintiffs expect to address the following
relief:

-- 1. Certification of this case as a class action pursuant to
Fed.
       R. Civ. P. 23(a) and (b)(3) on behalf of all non-exempt
       employees (including kitchen chefs, sushi chefs,
dishwashers,
       miscellaneous kitchen workers, waiters/waitresses, packers,
and
       bussers) employed by the Defendants since May 31, 2013 until

       present;

-- 2. Designation of the Plaintiff Yingcai Hong class
       representatives, and appointment of Troy Law, PLLC as class

       counsel; and

-- 3. Court-facilitated notice of class action in English,
Chinese,
       and Spanish to Class Members in the form proposed.

The Plaintiff was employed with the Defendants from Nov. 2015 to
Aug. 2016 and from Feb. 2017 to May 20, 2018, as a delivery man at
one of Defendant's restaurants. During Plaintiff's first part of
employment, the Plaintiff worked 58.5 hours per week and during the
Plaintiff's second part of employment, the Plaintiff worked 50
hours per week, the suit says.

During Plaintiffs' employment, the Plaintiff did not have any fixed
time for lunch or for dinner and was required to work through the
"break" time that was awarded to the plaintiff, even though that
time was deducted from his pay.

During the Plaintiffs first point of employment, the plaintiff
earned a flat rate of seven dollars and fifty cents ($7.50) per
hour and through the Plaintiffs second point of employment, the
Plaintiff earned nine dollars and fifteen cents ($9.15) per hour.
At all times during the Plaintiffs' employment, the Defendant's
deducted ten dollars ($10.00) of the Plaintiff's tips and twenty to
twenty-five dollars in meal credit and twenty to twenty-four
dollars in transportation costs. The plaintiff was not informed of
the deductions that the Defendants made of the plaintiff's wages,
the suit alleges.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 12, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=UkmY1Q at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          John Troy, Esq.
          TROY LAW, PLLC
          41-25 Kissena Boulevard, Suite 110
          Flushing, NY 11355
          Telephone: (718) 762-1324
          Facsimile: (718) 762-1342
          E-mail: johntroy@troypllc.com

KROGER CO: Seeks to Permanently Seal Portions of Class Cert Bid
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JUDY KIRKBRIDE and BEETA
LEWIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
v. THE KROGER CO., Case No. 2:21-cv-00022-ALM-EPD (S.D. Ohio), the
Defendant asks the Court to enter an order granting unopposed
motion to permanently seal portions of the Plaintiffs' memorandum
of law in support of their motion for class certification and
certain supporting
Exhibits.

Kroger is an American retail company that operates supermarkets and
multi-department stores throughout the United States.

A copy of the Defendant's motion dated March 11, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=BoxsuT at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Defendant is represented by:

          Robert Webner, Esq.
          Nathaniel Lampley, Jr., Esq.
          VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP
          52 East Gay Street
          Columbus, OH 43215
          Telephone: (614) 464-6400
          Facsimile: (614) 464-6350
          E-mail: rnwebner@vorys.com
                  NLampley@vorys.com

                - and -

          Selina Coleman, Esq.
          Frederick Robinson, Esq.
          Andrew Y. Lu, Esq.
          Michael S. Leib, Esq.
          REED SMITH LLP
          1301 K Street, N.W.
          Suite 1000 – East Tower
          Washington, DC 20005
          Telephone: (202) 414-9200
          Facsimile: (202) 414-9299
          E-mail: scoleman@reedsmith.com
                  frobinson@reedsmith.com
                  andrew.lu@reedsmith.com
                  mleib@reedsmith.com

LATTER & BLUM: Peiffer Sues Over Real Estate Market Conspiracy
--------------------------------------------------------------
JOSEPH C. PEIFFER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. LATTER & BLUM HOLDING, LLC, LATTER & BLUM,
LTD., and LATTER & BLUM, INC. Defendants, Case No.
2:24-cv-00557-GGG-JVM (E.D. La., March 5, 2024) is a class action
against the Defendants which operate under various trade names the
dominant real estate brokerage in Louisiana, for agreeing,
combining, and conspiring to impose, implement, and enforce, along
with its co-conspirators, anticompetitive restraints that cause
home sellers to pay inflated commissions on the sale of their
homes, in violation of the Sherman Act.

According to the complaint, Latter & Blum, along with its
co-conspirators, has mandated and/or encouraged affiliates,
franchisees, brokerages, and individual realtors to join and
implement an anticompetitive agreement. Indeed, because Latter &
Blum is among the leading brokers in Louisiana, its participation
in the conspiracy and implementation and enforcement of its terms
is essential to the success of the conspiracy in Louisiana. The
unlawful restraints implemented and enforced by the conspirators
have benefitted Latter & Blum and its co-conspirators and furthered
their common goals by allowing brokers to impose supra-competitive
charges on home sellers in Louisiana and restrain competition by
forestalling competition from lower-priced alternatives.

As a result, home sellers such as Plaintiff and the other class
members have paid an inflated and fixed rate for services provided
to their contractual counterparty. The Plaintiff and the other
class members have each incurred, on average, thousands of dollars
in improper charges as a result of the conspiracy. In a competitive
market, buyers would have the incentive to set and negotiate
buyer-broker prices, and the total commissions paid in any
transaction, including the commissions paid by sellers would be
lower, says the suit.

Latter & Blum Holding, LLC is a licensed real estate service
provider in Texas.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Benjamin D. Reichard, Esq.
          James R. Swanson, Esq.
          Molly L. Wells, Esq.
          FISHMAN HAYGOOD L.L.P
          201 St. Charles Avenue, 46th Floor
          New Orleans, LA 70170
          Telephone: (504) 586-5252
          Facsimile: (504) 586-5250
          E-mail: breichard@fishmanhaygood.com
                  jswanson@fishmanhaygood.com
                  mwells@fishmanhaygood.com

               - and -

          Joseph R. Saveri, Esq.
          Cadio Zirpoli, Esq.
          JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM
          601 California Street, Suite 1000
          San Francisco, CA 94108
          Telephone: (415) 500-6800
          E-mail: jsaveri@saverilawfirm.com
                  czirpoli@saverilawfirm.com

               - and =

          Robert Leiff, Esq.
          P.O. Drawer A
          Rutherford, CA 94573
          E-mail: rlieff@lieff.com

LIGHTFIRE PARTNERS: Alley Must File Reply to Response by April 5
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Aley v. Lightfire
Partners, LLC, Case No. 5:22-cv-00330 (N.D.N.Y., Filed April 7,
2022), the Hon. Judge Anne M. Nardacci entered an order granting
the Defendant a final extension of time of up to and including
March 22, 2024, to file a response to the pending Motion for Class
Certification and a motion pursuant to Rule 56.

-- The Plaintiff shall file any reply to the response on or before

    April 5, 2024.

-- There will be no further extensions absent a showing of
    extraordinary circumstances, the Court says.

On March 7, 2024, the Defendant filed a Motion for an Extension of
Time to file a response to the Motion for Class Certification and a
dispositive motion in this matter.

On March 8, 2024, the Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to
Defendant's request for additional time.

The nature of suit states Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.
[CC]


LONG BEACH, NY: Class Cert Bid Filing Extended
-----------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Guma. et al v. The City of
Long Beach, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-04529 (E.D.N.Y., Filed June
20, 2023), the Hon. Judge Gary R. Brown entered an order on motion
for extension of time to file on Plaintiffs' anticipated motion for
class certification as follows:

   -- Plaintiffs' Motion to be served by March 29, 2024

   -- Defendants' Opposition to be served by April 19, 2024

   -- Plaintiffs' Reply to be served by May 2, 2024

The suit alleges violation of Civil Rights Act.[CC]



LONG BEACH, NY: Class Cert Briefing Sched Extended in Guma
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Guma, et al v. The City of
Long Beach et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-04529-GRB-JMW (E.D.N.Y.), the
Plaintiffs asks the Court to enter an order granting a two-week
extension of time of the briefing schedule dates the Court adopted
on February 24, 2024, in which to serve and file a motion for class
certification.

The parties have agreed to the following revised schedule for
serving the motion papers in accordance with Rule 3(C.) (1.) of
Magistrate Judge Wicks's individual rules and request that the
Court approve said changes.

      The Plaintiffs will serve their motion to certify upon the
      Defendants on or before March 29, 2024.

      The Defendants will serve their opposition, if any, upon the
      Plaintiffs on or before April 19, 2024.

      The Plaintiffs will serve their reply upon the Defendants on
or
      before May 2, 2024.

Once the motion is fully briefed, the parties will file their
respective papers with the Court on May 2, 2024, in accordance with
Magistrate Judge Wicks's individual rules.

Long Beach is a coastal city and port in Southern California.
Moored in its Queensway Bay.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 12, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=deZrP0 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Andrew J. Campanelli, Esq.
          CAMPANELLI & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          1757 Merrick Avenue, Suite 204
          Merrick, NY 11566
          Telephone: (516)746-1600
          Facsimile: (516) 746-2611

LYONS MAGNUS: Final Approval of Class Settlement Sought in Catalano
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Wayne Catalano, Karen
Radford, Christy Deringer, Tomoko Nakanishi, Veronica Pereyra,
Roberta Sinico, Barbara Speaks, and Edmond Dixon, individually on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Lyons
Magnus, LLC and TRU Aseptics, LLC, Case No. 7:22-cv-06867-KMK
(S.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiffs move the Court to enter an order
granting:

-- Final approval of the class action settlement pursuant to Rule
23
    of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

-- Final approval of a proposed settlement with the Defendants and

    affirmation of the certification of the Settlement Class
defined
    in the Settlement Agreement.

Lyons is in the foodservice industry.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 11, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=DUfDlY at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jason P. Sultzer, Esq.
          Joseph Lipari, Esq.
          Jeremy Francis, Esq.
          THE SULTZER LAW GROUP P.C.
          85 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 200
          Poughkeepsie, NY 12061
          Telephone: (845) 483-7100
          Facsimile: (888) 749-7747
          E-mail: sultzerj@thesultzerlawgroup.com
                  liparij@thesultzerlawgroup.com
                  francisj@thesultzerlawgroup.com

                - and -

          Charles E. Schaffer, Esq.
          LEVIN SEDRAN & BERMAN
          510 Walnut Street, Suite 500
          Philadelphia, PA 19106
          Telephone: (215) 592-1500
          E-mail: cschaffer@lfsblaw.com

                - and -

          Eric M. Poulin, Esq.
          Roy T. Willey, IV, Esq.
          Blake G. Abbott, Esq.
          Paul J. Doolittle, Esq.
          POULIN | WILLEY | ANASTOPOULO, LLC
          32 Ann Street Charleston, SC 29403
          Telephone: (843) 614-8888
          E-mail: roy@akimlawfirm.com
                  blake@akimlawfirm.com
                  pauld@akimlawfirm.com

                - and -

          Kiley Grombacher, Esq.
          BRADLEY/GROMBACHER LLP
          31365 Oak Crest Dr., Suite 240
          Westlake Village, CA
          E-mail: Kgrombacher@bradleygrombacher.com

                - and -

          Bryan F. Aylstock, Esq.
          AYLSTOCK, WITKIN, KREIS &
          OVERHOLTZ, PLLC
          1700 East Main Street, Suite 200
          Pensacola, FL 32502
          E-mail: baylstock@awkolaw.com

MARRIOTT INT'L: Hall Seeks Reconsideration of Class Cert Denial
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as TODD HALL and GEORGE
ABDELSAYED individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Case No. 3:19-cv-01715-JO-AHG (S.D. Cal.), the Plaintiffs will move
the Court for reconsideration of the Court's minute order denying
the parties' joint motion seeking approval of the settlement and to
vacate the class certification order and dismiss the case.

Marriott is an American multinational company that operates,
franchises, and licenses lodging brands that include hotel,
residential, and timeshare properties.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 13, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=ECv9XW at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Ronald A. Marron, Esq.
          Lilach Halperin, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF RONALD
          A. MARRON
          651 Arroyo Drive
          San Diego, CA 92103
          Telephone: (619) 696-9006
          Facsimile: (619) 564-6665
          E-mail: ron@consumersadvocates.com
                  lilach@consumersadvocates.com

                - and -

          L Timothy Fisher, Esq.
          BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
          1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
          Walnut Creek, CA 94596
          Telephone: (925) 300-4455
          Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
          E-mail: ltfisher@bursor.com

                - and -

          Robert L. Teel, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT L. TEEL
          1425 Broadway, Mail Code: 20-6690
          Seattle, WA 98122
          Telephone: (866) 833-5529
          Facsimile: (855) 609-6911
          E-mail: lawoffice@rlteel.com

MARS PETCARE: Plaintiffs' Bids to Seal Granted in Part
------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as TAMARA MOORE, et al., v.
MARS PETCARE US, INC., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-07001-MMC (N.D.
Cal.), the Hon. Judge Maxine Chesney entered an order granting in
part and denying in part the Plaintiffs' administrative motions to
seal.

Mars provides pet care products.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=LQ5sEI at no extra
charge.[CC]

MARTINEZ REFINING: Court Amends Scheduling Order in Piscitelli
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOSEPH PISCITELLI and LARA
ZANZUCCHI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, v. MARTINEZ REFINING COMPANY LLC, Case No.
4:23-cv-04184-HSG (N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Haywood Gilliam, Jr.
entered an order amending the Scheduling Order dated Jan. 17, 2024,
to reflect that discovery is bifurcated into a class certification
phase, followed by a merits phase.

-- The current discovery deadline of Aug. 2, 2024 remains in place

    only for class certification discovery, with a deadline for
merits  
    discovery to be set after class certification has been decided.


-- During the class certification phase, discovery shall involve
    inquiry into issues relevant to the suitability of the case for

    class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) (numerosity,
    commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation) and
Fed.
    R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3) (predominance and superiority).

-- Specifically, discovery related to the substantive merits of
    Plaintiffs' claims, such as the cause of any noxious odors or
    emissions, will be reserved for the merits phase of discovery.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=PJG7LV at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

         Mike Arias, Esq.
         Arnold Wang, Esq.
         M. Anthony Jenkins, Esq.
         ARIAS SANGUINETTI WANG & TORRIJOS, LLP

              - and -

         Steven Liddle, Esq.
         Laura Sheets, Esq.
         Matthew Robb, Esq.
         LIDDLE SHEETS COULSON P.C.

The Defendant is represented by:

         Jason Levin, Esq.
         Jennifer Bonneville, Esq.
         Lisa L. Garcia, Esq.
         Meaghan G. Boyd, Esq.
         ALSTON & BIRD LLP
         350 South Grand Avenue, 51st Floor
         Los Angeles, CA 90071-1410
         Telephone: 213-576-1000
         Facsimile: 213-576-1100
         E-mail: jason.levin@alston.com
                 jennifer.bonneville@alston.com
                 lisa.garcia@alston.com
                 meaghan.boyd@alston.com

MDL 3083: MoveIt Data Breach Suits Transferred to D. Mass.
----------------------------------------------------------
In litigation "In re: MoveIt Customer Data Security Breach
Litigation," Judge Karen K. Caldwell, Chairperson of the U.S.
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transfers 3 cases each
from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Western District of New York and the Eastern District of Virginia,
all to the District of Massachusetts and, with the consent of that
court, assigned to Judge Allison D. Burroughs for coordinated or
consolidated pretrial proceedings.

All actions can be expected to share factual questions arising from
allegations that a vulnerability in Progress Software Company's
"MOVEit Transfer" and "MOVEit Cloud" file transfer services was
exploited by a Russian cybergang in May 2023, which to date is
estimated to have compromised the personally identifying
information (PII) of over 55 million people. On May 31, 2023,
Progress posted a notice on its website stating it had discovered
an SQL injection vulnerability in its MOVEit file transfer services
and a related breach in its network and systems. Plaintiffs are
individuals whose PII was potentially compromised who bring largely
overlapping putative nationwide or statewide class actions on
behalf of persons impacted by the exploitation of the MOVEit
software vulnerability.

These actions can be expected to share common and complex factual
questions as to how the MOVEit vulnerability occurred, the
circumstances of the unauthorized access and data exfiltration, and
Progress's response to it, as well as the response of various
downstream MOVEit users and customer-facing defendants with whom
plaintiffs did business. Centralization offers substantial
opportunities to streamline pretrial proceedings; reduce
duplicative discovery and conflicting pretrial obligations; prevent
inconsistent rulings on summary judgment motions; and conserve the
resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary. Given
the likely need of discovery from Progress and transferor court's
ability to decide the motion to dismiss, the panel deems transfer
is appropriate.

A full-text copy of the court's January 30, 2024 order is available
at
https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/MDL-3083-Transfer_Order-9-23.pdf



MYTHICAL VENTURE: Hall Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Bid
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as KRISTEN HALL, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. MYTHICAL
VENTURE, INC., Case No. 2:23-cv-10324-JFW-KES (C.D. Cal.), the
Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order granting her unopposed
motion for an extension of the class certification deadline by 30
days, which would move the deadline from April 16, 2024, to May 16,
2024.

Mythical operates as an e-commerce platform that offers curated
luxury products.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 11, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=qRRERN at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jacob U. Ginsburg, Esq.
          Craig T. Kimmel, Esq.
          KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C.
          30 E. Butler Ave.
          Ambler, PA 19002
          Telephone: (267) 468-5374
          E-mail: jginsburg@creditlaw.com
                  kimmel@creditlaw.com
                  teamkimmel@creditlaw.com

                - and -

          Christopher E. Roberts
          BUTSCH ROBERTS & ASSOCIATES LLC
          7777 Bonhomme Avenue, Suite 1300
          Clayton, MO 63105
          Telephone: (314) 863-5700
          E-mail: CRoberts@butschroberts.com

                - and -

          Lenny Bush, Esq.
          BUSH LAW GROUP
          23679 Calabasas Road, Suite 1005
          Calabasas, CA 91302
          Telephone: (323) 868-1903
          E-mail: bushlawgroup@gmail.com

NEW YORK PAVING: Bid for Reconsideration Denied in Diaz Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DIAZ, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, v. NEW YORK PAVING INC.,
Case No. 1:18-cv-04910-ALC-GWG (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Andrew
Carter Jr. entered an order denying Defendants' motion for
reconsideration because they have not identified "an intervening
change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the
need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice."

The Parties are directed to file a joint status report on or before
March 26, 2024.

Despite Defendant's attempts to frame their arguments as stemming
from "the indisputable factual record, many of these matters remain
hotly contested between the Parties.

The Defendant argues that the class certification decision should
be reconsidered based on the Court's purported failure to consider
certain material facts.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=U9TlIm at no extra
charge.[CC]

NORTHERN TRUST: Court Extends ADR Deadline Until August 1
---------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Emerson v. Northern Trust
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:23-cv-00241 (N.D. Cal., Filed Jan.
18, 2023), the Hon. Judge Trina L. Thompson entered an order
granting the parties' motion to extend the ADR deadline until Aug.
1, 2024.

The nature of suit states Torts -- Personal Property -- Other
Personal Property Damage.[CC]

NORTHERN TRUST: Parties Seek to Modify Class Cert. Briefing
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CHANDLER EMERSON,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, Case No. 3:23-cv-00241-TLT (N.D. Cal.), the
Parties' ask the Court to modify the class certification briefing
schedule and hearing date and the mediation completion date.

On July 10, 2023, the Court issued a Case Management and Scheduling
Order which, set a class certification briefing schedule with an
August 13, 2024, motion hearing date and also a date to complete
private mediation of May 17, 2024.

                                       Current         Proposed New

                                       Deadline:       Deadline:

  Motion for Class Certification:     May 24, 2024      June 21,
2024

  Northern Trust's Opposition:        June 24, 2024     July 29,
2024

  Plaintiff's Reply:                  July 15, 2024     Aug. 19,
2024

  Hearing Date                        Aug. 13, 2024     Sept. 10,
2024

As the parties jointly reported to the Court on March 7, 2024 via
email, they have also agreed on Michael Ornstil as a mediator. Mr.
Ornstil, however, does not have availability before the current
May 17, 2024 mediation deadline or, in fact, until late July at the
earliest.

Subject to the Court's approval of extending the mediation
deadline, the parties have agreed to defer mediation until Aug. 28,
2024, when both parties and their respective counsel are available
and by which time the Plaintiff's class certification motion (under
the revised schedule proposed herein) will be fully briefed.

Accordingly, the parties submit that there is good cause to extend,
and thus request that the Court agree to extend, the mediation
completion deadline from May 17, 2024, to Aug. 29, 2024.
The parties do not request any further adjustments to the Case
Management and Scheduling Order. A stipulation and proposed order
are attached to this administrative motion.

Northern Trust provides investment banking services.

A copy of the Parties' motion dated March 11, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=1ps7uG at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Thomas J. Brandi, Esq.
          Brian J. Malloy, Esq.
          THE BRANDI LAW FIRM
          354 Pine Street, Third Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94104
          E-mail: tjb@brandilaw.com
                  bjm@brandilaw.com

                - and -

          Derek G. Howard, Esq.
          Ashley M. Romero, Esq.
          DEREK G. HOWARD LAW
          42 Miller Avenue
          E-mail: derek@derekhowardlaw.com
                  ashley@derekhowardlaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Laurie Edelstein, Esq.
          Caroline Hirst, Esq.
          Rachael M. Trummel, Esq.
          Daniel J. Weiss, Esq.
          JENNER & BLOCK LLP
          455 Market Street, Suite 2100
          San Francisco, CA 94105
          Telephone: (628) 267-6800
          E-mail: ledelstein@jenner.com
                  chirst@jenner.com
                  rtrummel@jenner.com
                  dweiss@jenner.com

NVIDIA CORP: Tobias Suit Seeks to Certify Plan Participant Class
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CRISTINA TOBIAS, ANTHONY
BRIGGS, ANN MACDONALD and DAVID CALDER, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, v. NVIDIA CORPORATION, THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF NVIDIA CORPORATION, THE NVIDIA CORPORATION 401(K)
PLAN BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE, and JOHN DOES 1-30, Case No.
4:20-cv-06081-JST (N.D. Cal.), the Plaintiffs move the Court,
pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 23, to certify the following proposed
Class:

         All persons, except Defendants and their immediate family

         members, who were participants in or beneficiaries of the

         Plan, at any time between Aug. 28, 2014 through the date
of
         Judgment (the "Class Period").

The Plaintiffs move for class certification because the Plaintiffs'
ERISA claims satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 23(a) and (b).

The Plaintiffs also move the Court for an order appointing the
Plaintiffs as representatives of the proposed class defined, and
appointing their counsel, Capozzi Adler, P.C. as Class Counsel.

The Plaintiffs assert the following claims:

    (1) Count I against the Committee Defendants for their failure
to
        prudently manage the Plan's assets because during the Class

        Period, "they did not make decisions regarding the Plan's
        investment lineup based solely on the merits of each
        investment and what was in the best interest of Plan
        participants" and "instead, the Prudence Defendants
selected
        and retained investment options in the Plan despite the
high
        cost of the funds in relation to other comparable
investments;
        and

    (2) Count II against the Monitoring Defendants for breach of
their
        fiduciary duties to monitor the Prudence Defendants
because,
        during the Class Period, they "failed to monitor and
evaluate
        the performance of the Committee Defendants or have a
system
        in place for doing so, standing idly by as the Plan
suffered
        significant losses as a result of the Committee Defendants'

        imprudent actions and omissions."

Ms. Tobias participated in the Plan during the Class Period, paying
the recordkeeping and administrative costs associated with the Plan
and investing in the investment options offered by the Plan and
which are the subject of this lawsuit.

Nvidia is an American multinational corporation and technology
company.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 12, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=xvBgZ9 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Mark K. Gyandoh, Esq.
          Donald R. Reavey, Esq.
          CAPOZZI ADLER, P.C.
          312 Old Lancaster Road
          Merion Station, PA 19066
          Telephone: (610) 890-0200
          E-mail: markg@capozziadler.com
                  donr@capozziadler.com

                - and -

          Daniel L. Germain, Esq.
          ROSMAN & GERMAIN APC
          5959 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 360
          Woodland Hills, CA 91367-7503
          Telephone: (818) 788-0877
          Facsimile: (818) 788-0885
          E-mail: Germain@Lalawyer.com

OXY USA: Rider Seeks to Certify Class of Stevens Suit Participants
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CHERRY RIDER, trustee of
the Cherry Rider Family Trust, R.W. and Cathy Lucas, Co-trustees of
the R.W. Lucas and Cathy Lucas Living Trust, individually and as
representative plaintiffs on behalf of persons or concerns
similarly situated, v. OXY USA, INC.; MERIT ENERGY COMPANY, LLC;
and MERIT HUGOTON, L.P., Case No. 6:23-cv-01274-KHV-TJJ (D. Kan.),
the Plaintiffs move the Court to enter an order:

   (1) certifying the putative plaintiff class of persons or
entities
       who were Participating Class Members in the class action
       settlement approved by the District Court of Stevens County,

       Kansas, on March 4, 2008, in the case of Opal Littell, et.
al
       v. OXY USA, Inc., Case No. 98-CV-51, together with their
       successors, and who have received, or are entitled to
receive,
       royalty payments from Merit Energy Company, LLC, Merit
Hugoton
       LP, and/or any related or affiliated entity, at any time
during
       the period of May 2014 to the present;"

   (2) appointing the Plaintiffs as Class Representatives;

   (3) appointing the Plaintiffs' Counsel as Class Counsel; and

   (4) directing that appropriate notice be given to all Class
       Members, so that the case can proceed on the merits of the
       claims.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 12, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=2mHYX3 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          David G. Seely, Esq.
          Ryan K. Meyer, Esq.
          Emily K. Arida, Esq.
          FLEESON, GOOING, COULSON & KITCH, L.L.C.
          301 N. Main, Ste. 1900
          Wichita, KS 67201
          Telephone: (316) 267-7361
          Facsimile: (316) 267-1754
          E-mail: dseely@fleeson.com
                  rmeyer@fleeson.com
                  earida@fleeson.com

                - and -

          Erick E. Nordling, Esq.
          KRAMER, NORDLING & NORDLING, LLC
          209 E. 6th St.
          Hugoton, KS 67951
          Telephone: (316) 544-4333
          E-mail: erick.nordling@nordlinglaw.com

PELICIA HALL: Allowed to File Exhibit Under Seal in Alexander
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ANDREW ALEXANDER, et al.,
V. PELICIA E. HALL, et al., Case No. 4:20-cv-00021-SA-JMV (N.D.
Miss.), the Hon. Judge Jane M. Virden entered an order granting the
Defendants' unopposed motion for leave to submit a legend to the
court "in camera" identifying "Doe" plaintiffs and permitting
defendants to file exhibit under seal.

   (1) Leave is granted for counsel on behalf of the Defendants,
       acting in concert with the Plaintiffs' counsel, to submit to

       the Court for in camera review a legend identifying the
names
       of the Plaintiffs identified as "Doe 1" through "Doe 14" in

       both Parties' briefs on class certification and Defendants'
       previously filed exhibits in support of their response to
       Plaintiffs' motion for class certification; and

   (2) Leave is granted for the Defendants' counsel to file under
       seal, and restrict from public view, an un-redacted version
of
       Plaintiffs' ARP records, a redacted version of which the
       Defendants previously filed as Exhibit 34 to their Response
to
       The Plaintiffs' motion for class certification.

Counsel for the Defendants are directed to submit an un-redacted
version of ECF No. 196-34 via email transmission to the Northern
District of Mississippi US District Court Clerk's Office at the
following email address: ecf_information@msnd.uscourts.gov.

A copy of the Court's order dated Mar. 8, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=9ooK9h at no extra
charge.[CC] 


PENNEY OPCO: Filing for Class Cert Bid in Atkinson Due Nov. 15
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JACOB ATKINSON,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
PENNEY OPCO LLC, a foreign limited liability company, Case No.
2:23-cv-01806-BJR (W.D. Wash.), the Hon. Judge Barbara Rothstein
sets the following deadlines and briefing schedule:

                 Deadline                       Date

  Joinder of Parties Deadline:               Apr. 8, 2024

  Amended Pleadings:                         Apr. 18, 2024

  Deadline to complete discovery on class    Oct. 15, 2024
  certification (not to be construed as a
  bifurcation of discovery):

  Deadline for Plaintiffs to file Motion     Nov. 15, 2024
  for Class Certification:

  Deadline for Defendant to file             Dec. 20, 2024
  Response to Motion for Class
  Certification

  Deadline for Plaintiffs to file            Jan. 3, 2025
  Reply in Support of Motion for
  Class Certification:

Penney is an American department store chain.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=fKPegr at no extra
charge.[CC]

PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: Court Amends Class Certification Order
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Joseph Pinzon v.
Pepperdine University (Pepperdine University Tuition and Fees
COVID-19 Refund Litigation), Case No. 2:20-cv-04928-DMG-KS (C.D.
Cal.), the Hon. Judge Dolly Gee entered an order approving
stipulation to amend class certification order:

-- The "Class" definition, as defined in the conclusion of the
    Court's Sept.26, 2023 order certifying class is amended.

-- The Class certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
23(b)(3)
    is defined as:

       All students who paid or were obligated to pay tuition,
fees,
       or other costs to Pepperdine University for the Spring 2020

       academic term. Excluded for this class definition are:

         (i) all students who enrolled in Pepperdine's education
             program that, prior to March 16, 2020, were offered
             exclusively online;

        (ii) all students who withdrew form the spring 2020
academic
             term; and/or

       (iii) Defendant, Defendant's officers, directors, agents,
             trustees, parents, children, corporations, trusts,
             representatives, employees, principals, servants,
             partners, joint ventures, or entities controlled by
the
             Defendant, and their heirs, successors, assigns, or
other
             people or entities related to or affiliated with the
             Defendant and/or Defendant's officers and/or
directors,
             the judges assigned to this action, and any member of
a
             judge's immediate family.

Pepperdine University is a private research university affiliated
with the Churches of Christ.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=6BqJOk at no extra
charge.[CC]

PINNACLE TOO: Plaintiffs Class Cert Reply Extended to March 28
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Charles v. Pinnacle Too,
LLC et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-04232-DEH-JW (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon.
Judge Jennifer Willis entered an order extending the Plaintiff's
time to file their replies to the Defendants' oppositions to the
Plaintiff's motion for class certification and the Plaintiff's
motion for final collective certification from March 14, 2024 to
March 28, 2024.

On Feb. 28, 2024, the Court Granted the Defendants' fourth request
to extend their deadline to oppose the motions from Feb. 29, 2024,
until March 7, 2024, thus pushing the deadline of the Plaintiff's
replies to March 14, 2024.

This is the Plaintiff's first request for an extension of the
deadline to file any motion papers.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=R0tke4 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          C.K. Lee, Esq.
          LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC
          148 West 24th Street, Eighth Floor
          New York, NY 10011
          Telephone: (212) 465-1180
          Facsimile: (212) 465-1181
          E-mail: info@leelitigation.com

PJ OPERATIONS: Crook FLSA Conditional Cert. Bid Granted in Part
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOEY CROOK, et al., v. PJ
OPERATIONS, LLC, d/b/a Papa John's Pizza, TOM WYLIE, and DAVID
ALLEN, Case No. 5:21-cv-00321-KKC-MAS (E.D. Ky.), the Hon. Judge
Karen Caldwell entered an order granting in part and denying in
part the Plaintiff's motion for Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
conditional certification and notice to putative class members as
follows:

    1. The Court authorizes Crook to deliver notice of this FLSA
       action to the following group of potential opt-in
plaintiffs:

          All current and former delivery drivers employed by the
          Defendants within the three years preceding the date of
this
          Order with the following exceptions: 1) any members of
          the Rule 23 classes in Edwards, et al. v. PJ Ops Idaho,
LLC,
          et al., Case. No. 1:17-283 (D. Id.) who worked for the
          Defendants on or before May 15, 2018; and 2) any
individuals
          who were parties to the FLSA action in the Edwards case.


    2. Within 30 days of the entry date of this order, the
Plaintiff's
       counsel shall send notice to each of the potential opt-in
       plaintiffs;

    3. The Defendants shall post the notice in plain view at all
Papa
       John's locations;

    4. Mr. Crook shall place the following statement in bold
       immediately below the case caption in the notice:

    5. The parties shall meet and confer within 14 days of the
entry
       date of this order

Mr. Crook was a delivery driver for PJ Operations. He asserts that
PJ Operations failed to pay him the minimum wage of $7.25 per hour
in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Mr. Crook asserts that the Defendants require that delivery drivers
use their own automobiles to deliver food to customers.

According to Mr. Crook, the reimbursement method used by the
Defendants does not reimburse the drivers for their actual expenses
or even a reasonable approximation of their expenses. Mr. Crook
alleges
that drivers are under-reimbursed to such an extent that their
wages fall below the federal minimum wage during all workweeks.

Crook brings the action as a collective action under the FLSA,
seeking to recover the past wages and overtime hours Crook asserts
that the Defendants owe him and other similarly situated drivers.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Hf4mqV at no extra
charge.[CC]

POLARIS INDUSTRIES: Court OK's Class Cert Notice in Guzman Lawsuit
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as PAUL GUZMAN, v. POLARIS
INDUSTRIES INC., et al., Case No. 8:19-cv-01543-FLA-KES (C.D.
Cal.), the Hon. Judge Fernando Aenlle-Rocha entered an order
approving joint
stipulation regarding Plaintiff's motion for approval of notice of

class certification.

   1. The Plaintiff will provide Defendants with the URL of the
class
      website and the verbatim contents of the website, including
      frequently asked questions, as well as the toll-free
telephone
      number and the verbatim telephone script associated with the

      telephone number by March 15, 2024.

   2. The Plaintiff will provide Defendants until March 22, 2024,
to
      comment on those materials and the parties will meet and
confer
      in good faith to come to an agreement on any proposed changes
to
      the class notice by March 29, 2024.

   3. The parties will seek approval of the court regarding the
      content of the website, including frequently asked questions,
as
      well as the toll-free telephone number and the verbatim
      telephone script associated with the telephone number.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=mHwGd3 at no extra
charge.[CC]

POLICYGENIUS LLC: Bid for Class Cert. in Torres Suit Due August 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as VALERIE TORRES et al., v.
POLICYGENIUS, LLC, Case No. 2:24-cv-00166-SB-PD (C.D. Cal.), the
Hon. Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. entered a case management order
as follows:

  Pretrial Conference                               Feb. 14, 2025
  (including hearing on motions in limine)

  Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties             May 10, 2024

  (Hearing Deadline)

  Motion for Class Certification                    Aug. 2, 2024

  Opposition to Motion for Class Certification      Aug. 16, 2024

  Reply Brief in Support of Class Certification     Aug. 30, 2024
  Motion for Class Certification Hearing            Sept. 20, 2024

  Discovery Deadline – Nonexpert                    Oct. 11,
2024

  Discovery Deadline – Expert                       Nov. 8, 2024

PolicyGenius operates as an insurance broker.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=xFjqJb at no extra
charge.[CC]

PROCTER & GAMBLE: Mannings Suit Removed to C.D. California
----------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned Mikkesha Mannings, Maureen Abernathy, Le Vasia
Jordan, Natalie Masud, as individuals; and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, an Ohio
Corporation; THIS IS L. INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1
through 20 inclusive, Case No. 23STCV30654 was removed from the
Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los
Angeles, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California on March 7, 2024, and assigned Case No. 2:24-cv-01873.

On the basis of the foregoing and other allegations in the
Complaint, Plaintiffs assert causes of action against P&G for
strict products liability-–failure to warn, fraudulent
concealment, fraudulent misrepresentation, and violation of
California's false advertising law, negligent misrepresentation,
violation of the California Business and Professions Code,
violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and quasi
contract/unjust enrichment.[BN]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Adam R. Fox, Esq.
          Hannah J. Makinde, Esq.
          SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP
          555 South Flower Street, 31st Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Phone: +1 213 624 2500
          Facsimile: +1 213 623 4581
          Email: adam.fox@squirepb.com
                 hannah.makinde@squirepb.com

               - and -

          Scott A. Kane, Esq.
          SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP
          201 E. Fourth St., Suite 1900
          Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
          Phone: +1 513 361 1200
          Facsimile: +1 513 361 1201
          Email: scott.kane@squirepb.com


PROGRESS SOFTWARE: Rehm Suit Transferred to D. Massachusetts
------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Christopher Rehm, Individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. Progress Software Corporation
a/k/a Progress, Welltok LLC, OSF Healthcare System, Case No.
1:24-cv-01014 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
Central District of Illinois, to the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts on March 7, 2024.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:24-cv-10581-ADB to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Statutory Actions for Other
Contract.

Progress Software Corporation -- http://www.progress.com/-- is an
American public company that produces software for creating and
deploying business applications.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Ryan F. Stephan, Esq.
          James B. Zouras, Esq.
          STEPHAN ZOURAS, LLP
          205 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2560
          Chicago, IL 60601
          Phone: (312) 233-1550
          Email: rstephan@stephanzouras.com
                 jzouras@stephanzouras.com

               - and -

          Molly Elizabeth Stemper, Esq.
          STEPHAN ZOURAS, LLP
          222 W. Adams Street, Suite 2020
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Phone: (414) 467-3710
          Email: mstemper@stephanzouras.com


PROGRESSIVE DIRECT: Watson Must File Class Cert Reply by April 15
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MELISSA WATSON,
individually and purportedly on behalf of others similarly
situated, V. PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No.
5:22-cv-00203-DCR-MAS (E.D. Ky.), the Hon. Judge Danny Reeves
entered an order granting the Plaintiff Watson's motion for an
extension of time to reply.

The following schedule is amended for disposition of this case:

-- 1. The Plaintiff has until April 15, 2024, to file a reply to
the
       Defendant's response to the motion for class certification.

-- 2. The Scheduling Order [Record No. 47] and Amended Scheduling

       Order [Record No 65] are not altered in any other respect.

Progressive underwrites auto, fire, marine, and casualty
insurance.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 13, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=6zap4O at no extra
charge.[CC]

PROGRESSIVE DIRECT: Watson Seeks More Time to File Class Cert Reply
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MELISSA WATSON,
individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, v.
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No.
5:22-cv-00203-DCR-MAS (E.D. Ky.), the Plaintiff moves the Court for
a 17-day extension to file the Plaintiff's reply in support of the
Plaintiff's motion for class certification through April 15, 2024.

The Plaintiff states as follows:

-- 1. This case is one of approximately 30 nearly identical
statewide
       class actions against the Defendant and its affiliates
       challenging the calculation of the Projected Sold Adjustment

       ("PSA") in valuing total-loss claims. King & Spalding LLP
       represents the defendants in all the PSA Cases, and Shamis &

       Gentile P.A., Edelsberg Law P.A., Normand PLLC, and Carney
       Bates & Pulliam represent nearly all plaintiffs in the PSA
       Cases.

-- 2. On October 25, 2023, the Parties jointly moved to modify the

       scheduling order by extending fact discovery and other
       scheduling order deadlines to allow sufficient time to
complete
       discovery. Specifically, the extension of time was necessary
to
       allow the Defendant sufficient time to produce 150 randomly

       selected claims files of putative class members that the
       Plaintiff requested and is essential to the Plaintiff's
Motion
       for Class Certification and Expert Disclosures. The Parties

       also discussed and proposed a schedule for briefing class
       certification that accounts for existing deadlines in the
       approximately 30 similar cases involving the same counsel on

       both sides.

-- 3. The Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification was filed on

       February 2, 2024.

-- 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Plaintiff's reply in
Support
       of her motion for class certification will be due on March
29,
       2024.

-- 5. In their Joint Motion for Modification of the Scheduling
Order,
       the Parties previously proposed a deadline of April 15,
2024,
       for the Plaintiff's reply.

Progressive underwrites auto, fire, marine, and casualty
insurance.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 12, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=LZumed at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Andrew J. Shamis, Esq.
          Edwin Eliu Elliott, Esq.
          Christopher Berman, Esq.
          SHAMIS & GENTILE, P.A.
          14 NE 1st Avenue, Suite 705
          Miami, FL 33132
          Telephone: (305) 479-2299
          E-mail: ashamis@shamisgentile.com
                  edwine@shamisgentile.com
                  cberman@shamisgentile.com

                - and -

          Lee Lowther, Esq.
          Hank Bates, Esq.
          CARNEY BATES & PULLIAM, PLLC
          519 West Seventh Street
          Little Rock, AR 72201
          Telephone: (501) 312-8500
          E-mail: llowther@cbplaw.com
                  hbates@cbplaw.com

                - and -

          Christopher Gold, Esq.
          EDELSBERG LAW, P.A.
          20900 NE 30th Avenue, Suite 417
          Aventura, FL 33180
          Telephone: (786) 289-9471
          E-mail: chris@edelsberglaw.com

                - and -

          J. Gerard Stranch, IV, Esq.
          STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC
          223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue
          Freedom Building, Suite 200
          Nashville, TN 37203
          Telephone: (615) 254-8801
          E-mail: gstranch@stranchlaw.com

QUALITY TEMPORARY: Class Settlement in Lockridge Gets Initial Nod
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MICHAEL LOCKRIDGE,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
QUALITY TEMPORARY SERVICES, INC. d/b/a QUALIFIED STAFFING, Case No.
4:22-cv-12086-FKB-APP (E.D. Mich.), the Hon. Judge F. Kay Behm
entered an order granting preliminary approval of class action
settlement.

-- Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 23 (b)(3) and (e) and for purposes of

    this Settlement only, the Court grants provisional
certification
    to the following Settlement Class:

    "All U.S. residents who Qualified Staffing identified as being
    among those individuals impacted by the Data Breach, including
all
    who were sent notice of the Data Breach.

    The Settlement Class specifically excludes: (i) Defendants and

    their respective officers and directors (ii) the Judge(s) to
whom
    the action is assigned and any member of those Judges’ staffs
or  
    immediate family members; and (iii) any other Person found by a

    court of competent jurisdiction to be a guilty under criminal
law  
    of initiating, causing, aiding or abetting the criminal
activity  
    occurrence of the Data Incident or who pleads nolo contendere
to  
    any such charge.

-- Plaintiff Michael Lochridge is preliminarily certified as Class

    Representative.

-- The Court finds that A. Brooke Murphy and William B. Federman
    are experienced and adequate counsel and are provisionally
    designated as Class Counsel under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(4).

-- The Court preliminarily finds that the proposed settlement
should
    be approved as: (a) the result of serious and extensive arm's-
    length and non-collusive negotiations; (b) falling within a
range
    of reasonableness warranting final approval; (c) having no
obvious
    deficiencies; and (d) warranting notice of the proposed
settlement
    to Settlement Class Members and further consideration of the
    settlement at the Final Approval Hearing.

-- The Final Approval Hearing shall be held before this Court on
    July 18, 2024, at 2:00 p.m.

-- The settlement claims administration firm Simpluris Legal
    Administration Services is appointed as Settlement
Administrator
    to supervise and administer the notice procedure, as well as
the
    processing of claims.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 13, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=OLkvAX at no extra
charge.[CC]


RB ROYAL: Conditional Certification Deadline in Bohnert Extended
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Bohnert v. RB Royal
Industries Inc., Case No. 2:23-cv-00141 (E.D. Wisc., Filed Feb. 03,
2023), the Hon. Judge Pamela Pepper entered an order granting Joint
Civil L.R. 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive Motion to Extend
Conditional Certification Deadline and to Continue Tolling
Limitations Period for Putative Collective Members.

-- The court entered an order that the time for the plaintiff to
file
    his motion for class certification is extended until the end of

    the day on May 17, 2024.

-- The court continues to toll the limitations period applicable
to
    members of the conditionally certified collective(s) as of Nov.
3,
    2023.

The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

RB Royal designs and manufactures custom hose and tube assemblies
as well as precision machined products for applications involving
fluid.[CC]

REALNETWORKS INC: Strougo Sues Over Misleading Proxy Statements
---------------------------------------------------------------
BARBARA STROUGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. REALNETWORKS, INC., ROBERT GLASER, BRUCE A.
JAFFE, CHRIS JONES, DAWN G. LEPORE, ERIC PRUSCH, MICHAEL B. SLADE,
and TIM WAN, Defendants, Case No. 2:24-cv-00297 (W.D. Wash., March
4, 2024) is a shareholder class action brought by Plaintiff on
behalf of the former minority shareholders of RealNetworks against
RealNetworks and the former members of its Board of Directors,
including Robert Glaser, the Company's Founder, Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and largest shareholder, for their violations of
Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in
connection with the acquisition of the Company by Glaser and
Glaser's investment entities Greater Heights LLC and Greater
Heights Acquisition LLC.

On July 28, 2022, the Company announced it had signed a definitive
agreement agreeing to sell the Company to Glaser for $0.73 per
share for each share of Company stock that Glaser did not already
own. At the time, the Company had over 47 million shares of common
stock issued and outstanding and Glaser owned approximately 39% of
the outstanding shares of RealNetworks's stock. The Transaction
closed on December 21, 2022.

According to the complaint, the Individual Defendants violated this
clause of Section 14(a) because they negligently caused or allowed
the Proxy to be issued with the intention of soliciting shareholder
support of the Transaction, and the Proxy contained untrue
statements of material fact that reasonable and diligent directors
would have corrected prior to disseminating the Proxy.

The Individual Defendants were negligent in allowing the Proxy to
be disseminated with materially misleading statements regarding the
Company's projections, the value of the Company, and the purported
fairness of the Transaction and the reasons that supported its
fairness. As directors of RealNetworks, the Individual Defendants
had a duty to carefully review the Proxy before it was disseminated
to ensure it did not omit statements of material fact. The
Individual Defendants were negligent in carrying out their duty
because, as set forth herein, the Proxy contains materially false
and misleading statements, says the suit.

As a direct and proximate result of the dissemination of the
misleading Proxy the Individual Defendants used to obtain
shareholder approval of the Transaction, Plaintiff and the Class
have suffered damages and actual economic losses, the suit
alleges.

RealNetworks, Inc. provides network-delivered digital media
applications and services to manage, play, and share digital media.
RealNetworks, Inc. was founded in 1994 and is headquartered in
Seattle, Washington.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Duncan C. Turner, Esq.
          BADGLEY MULLINS TURNER, PLLC  
          19929 Ballinger Way NE, Suite 200
          Seattle, WA 98155
          Telephone: (206) 621-6566
          E-mail: dturner@badgleymullins.com

               - and -

          Gustavo F. Bruckner, Esq.
          Samuel J. Adams, Esq.
          POMERANTZ LLP
          600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
          New York, NY 10016
          Telephone: (212) 661-1100
          E-mail: gfbruckner@pomlaw.com
                  sjadams@pomlaw.com

               - and -

          Daniel Kuznicki, Esq.
          KUZNICKI LAW PLLC
          445 Central Avenue
          Cedarhurst, NY 11516
          Telephone: (347) 696-1134
          E-mail: dk@kclasslaw.com

RENTGROW INC: Portions of Summary Judgment Must be Sealed
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Szewczyk v. RentGrow,
Inc., Case No. 1:22-cv-10734 (D. Mass., Filed May 11, 2022), the
Hon. Judge Myong J. Joun entered an order granting motion to seal
portions of and/or exhibits to Defendants motion for summary
judgment, statement of undisputed material facts, and opposition to
class certification.

-- Counsel will receive an email within 24 hours of this order
with
    instructions for submitting sealed documents for which leave
has
    been granted in accordance with the Local Rules of the U.S.
    District Court of Massachusetts.

The suit alleges violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

RentGrow provides resident screening services to property owners
and managers.[CC]

RICKEYO CONSTRUCTION: Class Cert Notice Granted in Part
-------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CARLOS ESPINOZA GARCIA,
RICARDO ORTIZ GARCIA, RAUL CRUZ JINEZ, and JARIO URIEL CRUZ PEREZ,
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v.
RICKEYO CONSTRUCTION, LLC, RICHARD OZMENT, individually, and
BENJAMIN WARD, individually, Case No. 2:23-cv-02426-atc (W.D.
Tenn.), the Hon. Judge Annie Christoff entered an order granting in
part and denying in part the Plaintiffs' motion for court-approved
notice to other employees and to equitably toll the statute of
limitations.

The request for equitable tolling as to potential plaintiffs is
denied without prejudice.

The request for Court-facilitated notice is granted, and the
parties are instructed as follows:

   1. The Plaintiffs are authorized to send notice of this matter
to
      other employees, thus allowing those receiving notice to join

      the collective action as the Plaintiffs, with the eligible
      class of employees defined as follows:

         All individuals employed and paid by Rickeyo Construction,

         LLC from July 13, 2020, to present in jobs involving
painting
         and construction who were compensated on an hourly basis
and
         who were not paid an overtime premium for all hours worked
in
         excess of 40 hours in a work week.

   2. The Defendants are ordered to produce to the Plaintiffs'
counsel
      within 10 days of this Order a list containing the names,
last
      known addresses, last known email addresses, and phone
numbers
      of all past and present hourly-paid employees employed by
      the Defendants from July 13, 2020, to present, satisfying the

      class definition.

   3. The Plaintiffs are authorized to send notice, in the form
      attached as Exhibit A to the Plaintiffs' motion, and consent
to
      join, in the form attached as Exhibit B to the Plaintiffs'
      motion, to all individuals whose names appear on the list
      produced by the Defendants' counsel by first-class mail and
      email so that they can assert their claims on a timely basis
as
      part of this litigation.

The Court said that "the Plaintiffs' motion to toll the statute of
limitations is premature."

On July 13, 2023, the Plaintiffs filed their complaint as a
collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act
("FLSA"). The Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants improperly
classified and paid them, and all other similarly situated
employees, as independent contractors. The Plaintiffs assert that
they were actually employees because of the nature and degree of
the Defendants' control over them. As a result, the Plaintiffs
claim that they were improperly denied overtime compensation.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 13, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Px4Rl7 at no extra
charge.[CC]

ROCKET CO: Shupe Bid to Seal Class Certification Reply OK'd
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CARL SHUPE, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. ROCKET
COMPANIES, INC., JAY FARNER, DANIEL GILBERT, and ROCK HOLINGS, INC,
Case No. 1:21-cv-11528-TLL-APP (E.D. Mich.), the Hon. Judge Thomas
Ludington entered an order granting the Plaintiffs' motion to file
under seal the Plaintiffs' reply in support of class certification.


The further orders that the Plaintiffs are directed to file the
full and unredacted version of their reply in support of their
earlier, renewed motion for class certification under seal.

Rocket is a Detroit-based fintech company consisting of mortgage,
real estate and financial service businesses.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=hA7tGm at no extra
charge.[CC]


SBS TRANSPORT: Stokes Must Prove Why Case Shouldn't Be Dismissed
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MANASSEH STOKES, v. SBS
TRANSPORT, LLC, Case No. 4:20-cv-02084-JSW (N.D. Cal.), the Hon.
Judge Jeffrey White entered an order directing the Plaintiff that
by no later than March 18, 2024, to show cause, in writing, why
this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

-- Failure to timely respond to this Order will result in
dismissal
    of this action without further notice. The Court also advises
    Plaintiff that filing a dismissal will not discharge this Order
to
    Show Cause.

-- On Nov. 6, 2023, the parties stipulated to amend the scheduling

    order to extend their deadline to mediate to January 12, 2024.

-- In their stipulation, which was approved by the Court, the
parties
    represented that extending the mediation deadline would not
impact
    the class certification briefing schedule. Per the scheduling
    order, the Plaintiff had until Feb. 20, 2024, to file a motion
for
    class certification.

SBS provides auto-hauling service.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=2PvhSj at no extra
charge.[CC]

SCISSORTAIL ENERGY: Dinsmore Suit Seeks to Certify Settlement Class
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Marvin B. Dinsmore, et
al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v.
Scissortail Energy, LLC, Case No. 6:22-cv-00352-GLJ (E.D. Okla.),
the Plaintiffs request that the Court enter the agreed proposed
preliminary approval order, through which the Court will:

   (1) certify the Settlement Class for Settlement purposes;

   (2) preliminarily approve the Settlement;

   (3) appoint the Plaintiffs as Class Representatives for the
       Settlement Class;

   (4) appoints Reagan E. Bradford and Ryan K. Wilson as Co-Lead
Class
       Counsel and James U. White, Jr. as Additional Counsel for
the
       Settlement Class;

   (5) approve the form and manner of the proposed Notice;

   (6) appoint JND Legal Administration as Settlement
Administrator;
       and

   (7) set a hearing date for final approval of the Settlement and

       application for an award of the Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees,

       litigation expenses and administration, notice, and
       distribution costs, and a case contribution award to the
       Plaintiffs.

After over one year of litigation, Plaintiffs have obtained a great
recovery for the Settlement Class, reaching a settlement with the
Defendant worth $825,000 in cash for Plaintiffs' class claims for
statutory interest owed on late payments of oil and gas proceeds
under Oklahoma law.

Accordingly, the Plaintiffs move the Court to certify Settlement
Class consisting of:

      All non-excluded persons or entities who, during the Claim
      Period: (1) received Late Payments from Defendant for
oil-and-
      gas proceeds from Oklahoma wells; or whose proceeds were sent
as
      unclaimed property to a government entity by the Defendant;
and
      (2) who have not already been paid statutory interest on the

      Late Payments. A “Late Payment” for purposes of this
class
      definition means payment of proceeds from the sale of oil or
gas
      production from an oil-and-gas well after the statutory
periods
      identified in Okla. Stat. tit. 52, section 570.10(B)(1)
(e.g.,
      commencing not later than six (6) months after the date of
first
      sale, and thereafter not later than the last day of the
second
      succeeding month after the end of the month within which such

      production is sold). Late Payments do not include: (a)
payments
      of proceeds to an owner under Okla. Stat. tit. 52,
570.10(B)(3)
      (minimum pay) or (b) prior period adjustments.

Excluded from the Class are: (1) Defendant, its parents,
affiliates, predecessors, and employees, officers, and directors;
(2) agencies, departments, or instrumentalities of the United
States of America or
the State of Oklahoma; (3) any Indian tribe as defined at 30 U.S.C.
section 1702(4) or Indian allottee as defined at 30 U.S.C. section
1702(2); and (4) Jack Mattingly, Kay Mattingly, Mike Healy Trust,
f/k/a Mike Healy, d/b/a MCR Investments, C.E. Garrett, G&W, a
Partnership, J.W. McTeirnan, Maxine Reynolds, Trustee of the Roy J.
Reynolds and Maxine M. Reynolds Revocable Trust of Oct. 30, 2020,
and J.W. McTiernan.

ScissorTail is an integrated electric company.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 13, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=2Zm0cg at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Reagan E. Bradford, Esq.
          Ryan K. Wilson, Esq.
          BRADFORD & WILSON PLLC
          431 W. Main Street, Suite D
          Oklahoma City, OK 73102
          Telephone: (405) 698-2770
          E-mail: reagan@bradwil.com
                  ryan@bradwil.com

                –and–

          James U. White, Jr., Esq.
          WHITE, COFFEY AND FITE, P.C.
          Oklahoma City, OK 73154
          Telephone: (405) 842-7545
          E-mail: jwhite@wcgflaw.com 


SEAWORLD PARKS: Plaintiffs' Bid for Leave to Amend Granted in Part
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as QUINTON BURNS et al., v.
SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC., SEAWORLD PARKS &
ENTERTAINMENT, LLC AND JOHN DOES 1,2,3 AND 4, Case No.
2:22-cv-02941-WB (E.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge Wendy Beetlestone
entered an order granting in part and denying in part the
Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend.

The Plaintiffs move for leave to amend their First Amended
Complaint, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), 16(b)(4), to reflect the
broader proposed class that they seek to certify in their Motion
for Class Certification and to include a negligent supervision
claim that previously was dismissed without prejudice.

The case arises out of allegations of racial discrimination at
Defendant SeaWorld in Langhorne, Pennsylvania Plaintiffs' First
Amended Complaint alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. section 1981 and
negligence.

SeaWorld is a leading theme park and entertainment company.

A copy of the Court's opinion dated Mar. 8, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=dMDTZm at no extra
charge.[CC]

SELECT REHAB: Class Cert. Filing in McLauglin Extended to May 17
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CHRISTINE MCLAUGHLIN,
CRYSTAL VANDERVEEN, and JUSTIN LEMBKE, and SCOTT HARDT,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, V.
SELECT REHABILITATION, LLC, Case No. 3:22-cv-00059-HES-MCR (M.D.
Fla.), the Hon. Judge Harvey Schlesinger entered an order extend-ng
the previously set mediation deadline to May 3, 2024.

-- The deadline to file for class certification will now be May
17,
    2024.

-- All other deadlines set in this Court's previous order remain
    unchanged.

Select is a provider of comprehensive rehabilitation services.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 14, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=iZ6XTR at no extra
charge.[CC]

SERGEANT THOMAS: Stoudemire Files Suit in D. South Carolina
-----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Soojimus, LLC. The
case is styled as Hazel Stoudemire, SR, in other words, for all
persons who are "similarly situated" v. Sergeant Thomas, Lieutenant
Priester, Captain Livingston, Bryan Stirling, Case No.
2:24-cv-01163-JFA-MGB (D.S.C., March 7, 2024).

The nature of suit is stated as Prison Condition for Civil Rights
Act.

Sergeant Thomas served as a Supply Quality Assurance NCO and Chief
Martial Arts Instructor at Blount Island Command.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


SHEARER'S FOODS: Moore Conditional Cert. Bid OK'd
-------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as LYNN MOORE, et al., v.
SHEARER'S FOODS LLC, Case No. 5:22-cv-01017-JRA (N.D. Ohio), the
Hon. Judge John Adams entered an order granting the Plaintiffs'
pre-discovery motion for conditional certification and
court-supervised notice to potential Opt-In Plaintiffs Pursuant to
29 U.S.C. section 216(b).

The Court says that it must consider the proper notice to be sent
out to potential plaintiffs. The parties' briefing has indicated a
disagreement over the proposed notice.

However, there is no indication that the parties have met and
conferred to determine whether a middle ground can be reached so
that a notice can be sent that is agreeable to all parties. The
parties are therefore instructed to meet and confer, the Court
adds.

Collectively, the Court interprets the affidavits from Named
Plaintiffs and several others to indicate a strong likelihood that
hourly production and manufacturing employees throughout the
company are similarly situated, as it appears the policies
surrounding pre-shift donning and huddles, clock-in restrictions,
breaks, and bonus structures applied companywide. Accordingly,
the motion is granted.

The Plaintiffs initiated this collective action pursuant to the
FLSA. They allege that Shearer’s employed three companywide
policies that led to unpaid overtime for hourly
production/manufacturing employees, and thus violations of the Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

Shearer's is a U.S. manufacturer and distributor of snack foods.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 14, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=nG5lHN at no extra
charge.[CC]

SPERO THERAPEUTICS: Bid to Dismiss Germond & Memon Suit Pending
---------------------------------------------------------------
Spero Therapeutics Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for the
fiscal period ending December 31, 2023 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2024 that the consolidated
Germond and Memon class suit dismissal motion remains pending in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New
York.

Two putative class action lawsuits were filed against the Company
and certain of its current and former executive officers in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York,
one captioned Richard S. Germond v. Spero Therapeutics, Inc., Ankit
Mahadevia, and Satyavrat Shukla, Case No. 1:22-cv-03125, filed on
May 26, 2022, and the other captioned Kashif Memon v. Spero
Therapeutics, Inc., Ankit Mahadevia, and Satyavrat Shukla Case No.
1:22-cv-04154, filed on July 15, 2022.

The parties moved to consolidate the two complaints on July 22,
2022, which were ordered consolidated on August 5, 2022
("Consolidated Putative Class Action").

The parties filed an Amended Complaint on December 5, 2022,
purported to be brought on behalf of stockholders who purchased our
common stock from September 8, 2020 through May 2, 2022.

The Amended Complaint generally alleges that the Company and
certain of its officers violated Sections 10(b) and/or 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")
and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by making allegedly false
and/or misleading statements concerning the New  Drug Application
("NDA") for tebipenem HBr in an effort to lead investors to believe
that the drug would receive approval from the FDA.

Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, interest, attorneys' fees, and
other costs. The Company filed a fully-briefed Motion to Dismiss on
June 21, 2023.

The Court has not yet ruled on the Motion.

Spero Therapeutics, Inc., together with its consolidated
subsidiaries is a multi-asset, clinical-stage biopharmaceutical
company focused on identifying, developing, and commercializing
novel treatments for bacterial infections, including multi-drug
resistant bacterial infections, and rare diseases.

STALLION EXPRESS: McCatty Class Suit Seeks Conditional Class Cert.
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MAXWELL McCATTY,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
STALLION EXPRESS, LLC and PHARMSCRIPT, LLC d/b/a PHARMSCRIPT of MA
and others, Case No. 1:24-cv-10224-MRG (D. Mass.), the Plaintiff
asks the Court to enter an order allowing conditional certification
of the collective action, and authorizing notice to issue to a
putative class consisting of the following group of individuals:

         All individuals who worked as Couriers for Stallion
Express,
         LLC and/or Pharmscript, LLC within the three years
preceding
         the filing of the complaint (Jan. 29, 2021) in this matter

         through the present.

Stallion Express provides pharmaceutical courier services that help
pharmacies.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 12, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=HODZMK at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Adam J. Shafran, Esq.
          RUDOLPH FRIEDMANN LLP
          92 State Street
          Boston, MA 02109
          Telephone: (617) 723-7700
          Facsimile: (617) 227-0313

STATE FARM: Bid for Class Certification in Gulick Due April 26
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as PAULA GULICK and SHARON
SCHLEHUBER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Case No.
2:21-cv-02573-TC-TJJ (D. Kan.), the Hon. Judge Teresa J. James
entered an order granting the unopposed motion and setting the
Third Amended Phase I Scheduling Order as follows:

            Event                         Deadline/Setting

  Defendant's expert disclosures for       March 29, 2024
  class certification due

  Motion for class certification +         April 26, 2024
  Defendant's motion for summary
  judgment on individual claims or
  issues + any motions to exclude
  expert testimony under Rule 702 to
  be filed by:

  Response to motions to be filed by:      May 24, 2024

  Replies to responses to motions to       June 21, 2024
  be filed by:

  All Phase I discovery completed          June 21, 2024

  Parties to email chambers of             Within two weeks of the

  Magistrate Judge to schedule             Court's ruling on class

  Phase II scheduling or status            certification
  conference

State Farm offers insurance products for health, disability,
professional liability, auto, motorcycles, sport and leisure
vehicle.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=N2pQ4C at no extra
charge.[CC]

T.L. CANNON: Must File Application Regarding Sealing of Exhibits
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Dees et al v. T.L. Cannon
Corp. et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-01537 (N.D.N.Y., Filed Dec. 10,
2020), the Hon. Judge Brenda K. Sannes entered an order directing
the Defendants make an application to the Court setting forth the
reasons that referenced exhibits should be sealed under the
governing legal standard.

In conjunction with the plaintiff's motion to certify class and for
leave to file first amended complaint, the Plaintiff has filed a
letter motion requesting leave to file under seal certain
exhibits.

The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.[CC]



TARGET CORP: Continues to Defend Federal Securities Class Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
Target Corp. disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for the fiscal
period ending December 31, 2023 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 13, 2024 that the Company continues to
defend itself from the federal securities class suit in the United
States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

On March 29, 2023, Target Corporation and certain of its officers
were named as defendants in a purported federal securities law
class action filed in the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota.

The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on December 15, 2023,
which alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5
relating to certain prior disclosures of Target about its business
model, strategy, and inventory.

The plaintiff seeks to represent a class of shareholders who
purchased or otherwise acquired Target common stock between
November 17, 2021 and May 17, 2022.

The plaintiff seeks damages and other relief, including attorneys'
fees, based on allegations that the defendants misled investors
about Target's business model, strategy, and inventory and that
such conduct affected the value of Target common stock.

Target intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit.



TIOGA DOWNS: Final Approval of Class Settlement Sought in Potter
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DAVID POTTER, on behalf of
himself and others similarly situated, v. TIOGA DOWNS RACETRACK,
LLC, Case No. 3:22-cv-00869-BKS-ML (N.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiff moves
the Court pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure and 29 U.S.C. section 216(b) for an order:

-- Granting final certification to the previously certified
    Settlement Class and previously certified Settlement
Collective,
    and

-- Granting final approval to the Settlement Agreement and all
terms
   thereof.

Tioga Downs is a county-fair-themed standardbred racetrack and
commercial casino.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 13, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=1B219V at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Matthew D. Carlson, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW D. CARLSON
          3959 N. Buffalo Road, Suite 29
          Orchard Park, NY 14127
          Telephone: (716) 242-1234
          E-mail: mdcarlson@mdcarlsonlaw.com

TRANSAMERICA LIFE: Wollam Loses Bid for Class Certification
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CYNTHIA WOLLAM, v.
TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 4:21-cv-09134-JST
(N.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Jon Tigar entered an order denying
Wollam's motion for class certification.

The Court finds that the proposed class fails to satisfy the
predominance requirement of Rule 23(b)(2) and the typicality
requirement of Rule 23(a), and certification under Rule 23(c)(4)
would not materially advance the litigation.

The case about the rights of life insurance policyholders who fail
to pay their premiums on time. Sections 10113.71 and 10113.72 of
the California Insurance Code, effective January 1, 2013, "changed
the grace period and notice requirements for life insurance
policies in California."

The Plaintiff Cynthia Wollam alleges that, since January 2013,
Defendant Transamerica Life Insurance Company (TLIC) "has
wrongfully terminated thousands of life insurance policies in
violation of" the Statutes.

Specifically, Wollam alleges that TLIC has failed "to provide full
60-day grace periods contained in the policy"; failed "to mail
compliant accurate and timely 30-day pending lapse notices" to
policy owners; failed "to provide annual notifications to policy
owners" of their rights to designate; wrongfully terminated
policies in contravention of the Statutes; and breached the
Statutes and the terms of its policies in other respects.

She alleges that these failures by TLIC constitute breach of
contract with its insureds and violate California's unfair
competition law.

She defines the proposed class as:

        All beneficiaries who made a claim, or would have been
        eligible to make a claim, for the payment of benefits on
        the Defendant's life insurance policies issued or delivered
in
        California that lapsed or were terminated for nonpayment of

        premium on or after Jan. 1, 2013, without the Defendant
first
        providing every notice, grace period, and offer of
designation
        required by Insurance Code Sections 10113.71 and 10113.72.

Transamerica offers life, health, and dental insurance.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 13, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=rcxdex at no extra
charge.[CC]

TULANE UNIVERSITY: Must Oppose Jones Class Cert Bid by April 16
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as SYLVIA JONES and JOHN
ELLIS, on behalf of themselves and other individuals similarly
situated, v. ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND D/B/A
THE TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA A/K/A TULANE UNIVERSITY, Case
No. 2:20-cv-02505-DJP-MBN (E.D. La.), the Hon. Judge Darrel James
Papillion entered an order modifying the case management schedule
for class
certification-related briefs, motions for summary judgment,
and to reset trial date, pretrial conference date, and related
pretrial deadlines:

             Event                   Prior Date         Proposed
New
                                                        Date

  Plaintiffs file Motion for Class   March 14, 2024     March 21,
2024
  Certification

  Defendant's written expert         March 15, 2024     March 22,
2024
  reports and disclosures for
  case-in-chief served on
  Plaintiffs

  Opposition to Motion for Class     April 9, 2024      April 16,
2024
  Certification

  Reply Brief on Motion for          April 23, 2024     April 30,
2024
  Class Certification

  Hearing on Class Certification     On briefs unless   May 1,
2024
                                     specified
                                     otherwise by the
                                     Judge Submission Date

Tulane is a private research university in New Orleans, Louisiana.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 13, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=nki5BV at no extra
charge.[CC]

TULANE UNIVERSITY: Parties Seek to Modify Case Management Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as SYLVIA JONES and JOHN
ELLIS, on behalf of themselves and other individuals similarly
situated, v. ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND D/B/A
THE TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA A/K/A TULANE UNIVERSITY, Case
No. 2:20-cv-02505-DJP-MBN (E.D. La.), the Parties move the Court
for an order modifying the case management deadlines, including
to:

-- postpone the deadlines for briefing on Plaintiffs' anticipated

    motion for class certification by 7 days for a May 1, 2024
    submission date,

-- extend the Defendant's expert report deadline 7 days to March
22,
    2024,

-- extend the motion for summary judgment deadline for a May 1,
2024
    submission date, and

-- reset the trial date, pretrial conference, and other related
    deadlines pending this Court's opinions on class certification
and
    summary judgment.

A copy of the Parties' motion dated March 12, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=He7Y3F at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          James A. Francis, Esq.
          John Soumilas, Esq.
          FRANCIS MAILMAN SOUMILAS, P.C.
          1600 Market Street, Suite 2510
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Telephone: (215) 735-8600
          Facsimile: (215) 940-8000
          E-mail: jfrancis@consumerlawfirm.com
                  jsoumilas@consumerlawfirm.com

                - and -

          Michael A. Tompkins, Esq.
          LEEDS BROWN LAW, P.C.
          One Old Country Road, Suite 347
          Carle Place, NY 11514
          Telephone: (516) 873-9550
          E-mail: mtompkins@leedsbrownlaw.com

                - and -

          Yvette Golan, Esq.
          THE GOLAN FIRM
          2000 M Street, NW, Suite #750-A
          Washington, D.C. 20036
          Telephone: (866) 298-4150
          Facsimile: (928) 441-8250
          E-mail: ygolan@tgfirm.com

                - and -

          David A. Szwak, Esq.
          BODENHEIMER, JONES & SZWAK, LLC
          416 Travis Street, Ste. 800
          Mid South Tower
          Shreveport, LA 71101
          Telephone: (318) 424-1400
          Facsimile: 221-6555

The Defendant is represented by:

          James M. Garner, Esq.
          Martha Y. Curtis, Esq.
          Joshua S. Force, Esq.
          Stuart D. Kottle, Esq.
          SHER GARNER CAHILL RICHTER KLEIN &
          HILBERT, L.L.C.
          909 Poydras Street, 28th Floor
          New Orleans, LA 70112
          Telephone: (504) 299-2100
          Facsimile: (504) 299-2300
          E-mail: jgarner@shergarner.com
                  mcurtis@shergarner.com
                  jforce@shergarner.com
                  skottle@shergarner.com

                - and -

          M. Scott Barnard, Esq.
          Brennan H. Meier, Esq.
          Jessica Mannon, Esq.
          AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
          2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1800
          Dallas, TX 75201
          Telephone: (214) 969-2800
          Facsimile: (214) 969-4343
          E-mail: sbarnard@akingump.com
                  bhmeier@akingump.com
                  jmannon@akingump.com

TURTLE BEACH: To File Defense Statement Complaint on April 30
-------------------------------------------------------------
Turtle Beach Corp. disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for the fiscal
period ending December 31, 2023 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission that the Company is set to file statement of
defense complaint on April 30, 2024.

On August 5, 2013, VTB Holdings, Inc. ("VTBH") and the Company
(f/k/a Parametric Sound Corporation) announced that they had
entered into the Merger Agreement pursuant to which VTBH would
acquire an approximately 80% ownership interest and existing
shareholders would maintain an approximately 20% ownership interest
in the combined company (the "Merger").

Following the announcement, several shareholders filed class action
lawsuits in California and Nevada seeking to enjoin the Merger.

The plaintiffs in each case alleged that members of the Company's
Board of Directors breached their fiduciary duties to the
shareholders by agreeing to a merger that allegedly undervalued the
Company.

VTBH and the Company were named as defendants in these lawsuits
under the theory that they had aided and abetted the Company's
Board of Directors in allegedly violating their fiduciary duties.

The plaintiffs in both cases sought a preliminary injunction
seeking to enjoin closing of the Merger, which, by agreement, was
heard by the Nevada court with the California plaintiffs invited to
participate.

On December 26, 2013, the court in the Nevada case denied the
plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction.

Following the closing of the Merger, the Nevada plaintiffs filed a
second amended complaint, which made essentially the same
allegations and sought monetary damages as well as an order
rescinding the Merger.

The California plaintiffs dismissed their action without prejudice,
and sought to intervene in the Nevada action, which was granted.

Subsequent to the intervention, the plaintiffs filed a third
amended complaint, which made essentially the same allegations as
prior complaints and sought monetary damages.

On June 20, 2014, VTBH and the Company moved to dismiss the action,
but that motion was denied on August 28, 2014.

On September 14, 2017, a unanimous en banc panel of the Nevada
Supreme Court granted defendants' petition for writ of mandamus and
ordered the trial court to dismiss the complaint but provided a
limited basis upon which plaintiffs could seek to amend their
complaint.

Plaintiffs amended their complaint on December 1, 2017 to assert
the same claims in a derivative capacity on behalf of the Company,
as a well as in a direct capacity, against VTBH, Stripes Group,
LLC, SG VTB Holdings, LLC, and the former members of the Company's
Board of Directors.

All defendants moved to dismiss this amended complaint on January
2, 2018, and those motions were denied on March 13, 2018.

Defendants petitioned the Nevada Supreme Court to reverse this
ruling on April 18, 2018.

On June 15, 2018, the Nevada Supreme Court denied defendants' writ
petition without prejudice.

The district court subsequently entered a pretrial schedule and set
trial for November 2019.

On January 18, 2019, the district court certified a class of
shareholders of the Company as of January 15, 2014.

On October 11, 2019, the parties notified the district court that
they had reached a settlement that would resolve the pending action
if ultimately approved by the Court.

On January 13, 2020, the district court preliminarily approved the
settlement between the plaintiffs and all defendants.

A final hearing was held on May 18, 2020, wherein the Court
approved the settlement and entered final judgment.

On May 22, 2020, PAMTP LLC, which purports to hold the claims of
eight shareholders who opted out of the class settlement described
above, brought suit against the Company, the Company's former Chief
Executive Officer, Juergen Stark, Stripes Group, LLC, SG VTB
Holdings, LLC, Kenneth Fox, and former members of the Company's
Board of Directors in Nevada state court.

This opt-out action asserts the same direct claims that were
asserted by the class of shareholders described above.

The defendants filed two motions to dismiss this complaint, which
were heard on August 10, 2020.

The Court denied those motions by order of August 20, 2020. The
case was tried in August 2021 and all remaining defendants,
including the Company, prevailed on all counts with final judgment
entered in their favor on September 3, 2021. Plaintiff is appealing
that judgment.

Employment Litigation: On April 20, 2017, a former employee filed
an action in the Superior Court for the County of San Diego, State
of California.

The complaint alleges claims including wrongful termination,
retaliation and various other provisions of the California Labor
Code.

The complaint seeks unspecified economic and non-economic losses,
as well as allegedly unpaid wages, unreimbursed business expenses
statutory penalties, interest, punitive damages and attorneys’
fees.

The Company filed a cross-complaint against the former employee on
May 25, 2017 for certain activities related to his employment with
the Company.

The matter was tried between September 24 and October 7, 2021.

On October 8, 2021 a jury rendered a unanimous verdict in favor of
the Company on the employment claims.

The Court granted a directed verdict to the Company on its Cross-
Complaint against the former employee.

Judgment was entered in favor of the Company on October 27, 2021.

On December 20, 2021, the former employee filed a notice of appeal
of the judgment.

On November 14, 2023, the court of appeal issued its opinion
affirming the judgment in favor of the Company.

On the Company's Cross-Complaint, the court directed the Company to
elect either punitive or statutory treble damages, but otherwise
affirmed.

Insolvency Dispute in Germany: On February 15, 2024, TBC Holding
Company LLC ("TBCH"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Turtle Beach
Corporation, was served with a lawsuit that was brought to the
German Higher Regional Court in Stade by the insolvency
administrator of KJE Europe GmbH, a company registered and existing
under the laws of Germany. In his complaint, the insolvency
administrator claims that TBCH is liable to reimburse any payments
received by the TBCH under a certain settlement agreement with KJE
Europe GmbH dated June 30, 2020. TBCH does not believe the claims
have merit and intends to defend itself in this proceeding.

TBCH will file its statement of defense to the complaint by April
30, 2024.

The Company will continue to vigorously defend itself in the
foregoing matters.



UNION PACIFIC: Court Narrows Claims in Cushman Suit
---------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MICHAEL CUSHMAN, v. UNION
PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Case No. 8:23-cv-00196-BCB-SMB (D. Neb.),
the Hon. Judge Brian C. Buescher  entered an order that:

   1. The Defendant Union Pacific's Motion to Dismiss, is granted
in
      part and denied in part; and

   2. The Defendant Union Pacific's Objection to plaintiff
Cushman's
      Notice of Supplemental Authority, is overruled.

The Plaintiff Cushman has sued his former employer defendant Union
Pacific Railroad Company under the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA). The Court previously dismissed Cushman's original Complaint
but granted him leave to amend.

Cushman alleges two counts of disability discrimination on
disparate-treatment theories under the ADA.

Count I asserts a claim under 42 U.S.C. section 12112(a), alleging
that "Union Pacific discriminated against Cushman on the basis of
disability by, among other things, removing him from service
because of a disability."

Count II asserts a claim under section 12112(b)(6), alleging:
Union Pacific discriminated against Cushman on the basis of
disability by using facially discriminatory qualification
standards, employment tests, and/or other selection criteria, as
part of its Fitness-For-Duty program and related policies, that are
intended to screen out individuals with disabilities, and which did
screen out
Cushman.

Union is a publicly traded railroad holding company.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=yM4T2V at no extra
charge.[CC]

UNITED BEHAVIORAL: Considers Sealing of Docs in Class Suit
----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as LD, DB, BW, RH and, CJ, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. UNITED
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, a California Corporation, UNITEDHEALTHCARE
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut Corporation, and MULTIPLAN, INC.,
a New York corporation, Case No. 4:20-cv-02254-YGR (N.D. Cal.), the
Defendants file an interim administrative motion to seal and to
consider whether another party's material should be sealed.

Pursuant to the Feb. 13, 2024 stipulation and order modifying
sealing procedures and Civil Local Rules 7-11(b), 79-5(c), and
79-5(f)(3), the Defendants move to seal portions of their
opposition to the Plaintiffs' renewed motion to class certification
as well as certain declarations and exhibits filed in support
thereof.

The reasons for sealing will be discussed in a forthcoming omnibus
sealing motion to be filed jointly by the parties, with supporting
declarations from any affected third parties "within 14 days after
the conclusion of briefing on the underlying motion or filing."

Separately, certain documents filed publicly and under seal contain
redactions for sensitive information consistent with Fed. R. Civ.
P. 5-2 and this District's guidance.

United Behavioral provides management services on a contract and
fee basis.

A copy of the Defendants' motion dated March 14, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=gNgzya at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Lauren M. Blas, Esq.
          Geoffrey Sigler, Esq.
          Derek K. Kraft, Esq.
          GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
          333 South Grand Avenue
          Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
          Telephone: (213) 229-7000
          Facsimile: (213) 229-7520
          E-mail: lblas@gibsondunn.com
                  gsigler@gibsondunn.com
                  dkraft@gibsondunn.com

                - and -

          Errol J. King, Jr., Esq.
          Craig L. Caesar, Esq.
          Katherine Cicardo Mannino, Esq.
          Taylor J. Crousillac, Esq.
          Brittany H. Alexander, Esq.
          PHELPS DUNBAR LLP
          II City Plaza
          400 Convention Street, Suite 1100
          Baton Rouge, LA 70802
          Telephone: (225)376-0207
          E-mail: Errol.King@phelps.com
                  Craig.Caesar@phelps.com
                  Katie.Mannino@phelps.com
                  Taylor.Crousillac@phelps.com
                  Brittany.Alexander@phelps.com

                - and -

          Dennis B. Kass, Esq.
          Adam D. Afshar, Esq.
          MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
          One California Street, Suite 900
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (415) 217-6900
          E-mail: dennis.kass@manningkass.com
                  adam.afshar@manningkass.com

UNITED STATES: Bid to Certify Class Withdrawn w/o Prejudice
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Astakhov, et al., v.
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al., Case
No. 1:23-cv-07565 (E.D.N.Y., Filed Oct. 17, 2023), the Hon. Judge
Frederic Block entered an order marking motion to certify class
withdrawn without prejudice.

The nature of suit states statutory actions.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is an agency of the
United States Department of Homeland Security that administers the
country's naturalization and immigration system.[CC]

UNITED STATES: Davis Files Suit in U.S. Ct. of Fed. Cl.
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed USA. The case is styled as
Rodney L. Davis, Thomas M. Davis, III, Eric A. Crawford, Edwin G.
Perlmutter, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
v. USA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00364-EGB (U.S. Ct. of Fed. Cl., March 7,
2024).

The nature of suit is stated as Miscellaneous – Damages for
Tucker Act.

The U.S. -- https://www.usa.gov/ -- is a country of 50 states
covering a vast swath of North America, with Alaska in the
northwest and Hawaii extending the nation's presence into the
Pacific Ocean.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Kenneth Cuccinelli, II, Esq.
          KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, ATTORNEY AT LAW
          10007 N. Harris Farm Road
          Spotsylvania, VA 22553
          Phone: (804) 286-2550
          Email: KTCLaw@proton.me


UNITED STATES: Parties Must Explain Why Discovery Should Be Open
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as BARBEL PERISSA, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated, v. UNITED STATES POLO

ASSOCIATION, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-10650-VSB (S.D.N.Y.), the
Hon. Judge Vernon Broderick entered an order that the parties shall
file a joint letter, by March 19, 2024, explaining why discovery
should remain open while the Court considers Plaintiff's
anticipated motion for class certification.

-- To the extent the parties disagree on one or more issues, the
    parties should set forth their respective positions as to each

    disputed issue in separately designated sections of the joint
    letter.

Rather than list specific dates for the discovery deadlines, the
parties tethered several of the dates in the CMP to the date of my
decision on the Plaintiff's anticipated motion for class
certification, which Plaintiff proposes filing by Dec. 6, 2024.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 12, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=zyusd9 at no extra
charge.[CC]

UNITED STATES: Parties Seek to Dismiss Class Suit w/o Prejudice
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ANIKA OKJE
ERDMANN-BROWNING and JACQUELINE BENITEZ, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, v. THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary
of the United States Department of Agriculture, in his official
capacity; SHALANDA YOUNG, Director of the United States Office of
Management and Budget, in her official capacity, Case No.
4:23-cv-04678-JST (N.D. Cal.), the Parties jointly stipulate to and
request dismissal of the action without prejudice, pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

On Sept. 12, 2023, the Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint
for declaratory and injunctive relief (ECF No. 1), and on Feb. 6,
2024, filed an Amended Class Action Complaint for declaratory and
injunctive relief seeking to ensure the timely issuance of
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits in the
event of a lapse in government funding.

The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on Feb. 15, 2024,
currently set for hearing on April 18, 2024.

The Plaintiffs filed motions for preliminary injunction and class
certification on Feb. 29, 2024, currently set for hearing on April
18, 2024.

On March 9, 2024, President Biden signed the consolidated
appropriations act, 2024, which included appropriations for SNAP
through the end of Federal Fiscal Year 2024.

Neither Plaintiffs nor their counsel received any consideration for
agreeing to dismiss the lawsuit.

The Court has not certified a class in this action and no
settlement is part of the request to dismiss the action, so no
notice to putative class members is needed

The US Department of Agriculture is the federal executive
department responsible for developing and executing federal laws
related to farming, forestry, rural economic development, and
food.

A copy of Parties' motion dated March 13, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=fLGKB4 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jodie Berger, Esq.
          Richard Rothschild, Esq.
          Robert Newman, Esq.
          Antionette Dozier, Esq.
          WESTERN CENTER ON LAW & POVERTY
          3701 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 208
          Los Angeles, CA 90010
          Telephone: (213) 235-2617
          Facsimile: (213) 487-0242
          E-mail: jberger@wclp.org
                  rrothschild@wclp.org
                  rnewman@wclp.org
                  adozier@wclp.org

                - and -

          Lindsay Nako, Esq.
          Lori Rifkin, Esq.
          Fawn Rajbhandari-Korr, Esq.
          Meredith Dixon, Esq.
          IMPACT FUND
          2080 Addison St., Suite 5
          Berkeley, CA 94704
          Telephone: (510) 845-3473
          Facsimile: (510) 845-3654
          E-mail: lnako@impactfund.org
                  lrifkin@impactfund.org
                  fkorr@impactfund.org
                  mdixon@impactfund.org

The Defendants are represented by:

          Rachael Westmoreland, Esq.
          U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
          950 Pennsylvania Ave
          Nw Washington, DC 20530
          Telephone: (202) 514-2000

UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS: Bid to Certify Class of L2L Drivers Tossed
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ANGELA VALDEZ, RICKY
ABEYTA, MARK FRANKLIN, MICHAEL CHILDS, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, KEATE WRIGHT, individually, and
ERIC SHORT, individually, v. UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS OF VIRGINIA, LLC.,
a Virginia limited liability company, Case No.
1:23-cv-01015-PAB-KAS (D. Colo.), the Hon. Judge Philip Brimmer
entered an order denying the Plaintiffs' motion for class
certification of:

   "All regular full-time and/or part-time L2L drivers in Colorado
who
   did not cross state lines during their deliveries from March 16,

   2020 to Dec. 31, 2020 and worked overtime and/or more than 2
hours
   on any work shift."

The court further orders that the Defendants' motion for leave to
file surreply in opposition to the Plaintiffs' motion for class
certification is denied.

The Plaintiffs allege that Universal violated Colorado law by
failing to pay them and class members overtime compensation for
hours worked in excess of 40 hours per week and by failing to allow
their drivers to take rest and meal breaks.

Universal operates a trucking business that contracts with forty
Home Depot stores across the front range of Colorado to make
deliveries on behalf of Home Depot.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 13, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=2Fz57g at no extra
charge.[CC]

UPFIELD US: Court Concludes All Discovery in Clemmons Action
------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DUVAL CLEMMONS,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
UPFIELD US INC., Case No. 1:22-cv-00355-PKC (S.D.N.Y.), the Hon.
Judge P. Kevin Castel entered an order that all discovery in the
Clemmons action is concluded.

  -- The Defendant's motion due April 12, 2024, the Plaintiff's
     response due May 13, 2024 and Defendant's reply due May 31,
2024.

  -- The Plaintiff's proposed motion for class certification is
     deferred until after disposition of the Defendant's motions.

Upfield is a producer of plant-based spreads.

A copy of the Court's order dated Mar. 8, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=AIXwxI at no extra
charge.[CC]

US PREMIUM BEEF: NBP Continues to Defend Brown Class Suit
---------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Premium Beef LLC disclosed in its Form 10-K Report for the
fiscal period ending December 30, 2023 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2024 that National Beef
Packing Co. (NBP), is the only beef processor that Company, has a
cattle delivery agreement with Company continues to defend itself
from the Brown class suit in the United States District Court for
the District of Colorado.

NBP and is a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit entitled
Brown, et al. v. JBS USA Food Company et al. and filed in the
United States District Court for the District of Colorado on
November 1, 2022.

The defendants filed motions to dismiss, which the court denied
except as to the Company's subsidiary, Iowa Premium.

The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on January 12, 2024.

The amended complaint alleges that the defendants directly and
through industry wage surveys and a benchmarking service (i) fixed
wages and benefits, and (ii) exchanged information regarding
compensation and benefits in an effort to depress and stabilize
wages and benefits in violation of federal antitrust laws.

The plaintiffs seek, among other things, treble monetary damages,
pre- and post-judgment interest, declaratory and injunctive relief
and the costs of the suit (including attorney fees).

NBP believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims in this case
and intends to defend the case vigorously.

National Beef Packing Company, LLC, Defendant, represented by
Craig S. O'Dear -- csodear@bryancave.com -- Bryan Cave LLP - KC,
Jennifer L Berhorst -- jennifer.berhorst@bryancave.com -- Bryan
Cave LLP - KC, Sara Kay Butler, Mariner Holdings, LLC & Tonya B.
Braun -- tbraun@jonesday.com -- Jones Day.

U.S. Premium Beef, LLC operates an integrated cattle processing
and
beef marketing enterprise based in Missouri.



VALLEY FIRST: Class Settlement in Ayala Gets Final Nod
------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as KARLA AYALA, an
individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
v. VALLEY FIRST CREDIT UNION, Case No. 1:22-cv-00657-HBK (E.D.
Cal.), the Hon. Judge Helena Barch-kuchta entered an order granting
the Plaintiff's
unopposed motion for final approval of class action settlement.

-- The Plaintiff's unopposed motion for attorney's fees, costs,
and
    incentive award to Plaintiff is granted in part to the extent
the
    Court awards the following sums:

    a. Class counsel shall receive $30,000.00 in attorneys' fees
and
       $402.00 in costs;

    b. The Plaintiff Ayala shall receive $5,000.00 as a service
award;
       and

    c. RG2 shall receive $10,000.00 in settlement administration
costs
       and expenses.

-- The parties are directed to effectuate all terms of the
settlement
    agreement and any deadlines or procedures for distribution set

    forth therein within 11 months of this date of this Order.

-- The action is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the
    terms of the parties' settlement agreement.

Rule 23 Settlement Class

The proposed Settlement Class is identified as:

   "The 48 individuals who, according to Defendant's records, were
   legally residing in California and applied for membership with
   Defendant from June 1, 2020 through June 1, 2022 using a "work
   only" social security number and were denied membership based
   solely on their lack of U.S citizenship."

   There are 48 members in the Settlement Class.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 11, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Xo7XB1 at no extra
charge.[CC]

VERIZON NEW ENGLAND: Court Narrows Claims in Urella Suit
--------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as KELLEY URELLA,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND INC, JOSEPH SANTOS, and ROBERT SYMES, Case No.
4:22-cv-11606-FDS (D. Mass.), the Hon. Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV
entered an order denying in part and granting in part the
Defendants' partial motion to dismiss and to strike the plaintiff's
second amended complaint of defendants Verizon New England Inc.,
Joseph Santos, and Robert Symes, as follows:

   1. All claims as to defendant Symes are dismissed;

   2. Count 3 as to defendant Santos is dismissed;

   3. Count 6 is dismissed; and

   4. The motion to strike is denied.

This is a claim for gender discrimination and retaliation. The
Plaintiff Kelley Urella was an employee of Verizon New England Inc.
who worked in a "clerical/office" position. She alleges that she
was not hired in any of those positions because of her gender and
that she was retaliated against for asserting her rights.

The complaint alleges that Urella was qualified for several of
those craft-rated jobs by her training, education, and physical
suitability.

The complaint alleges that in each instance when Urella, and other
proposed class members, applied for craft-rated positions,
defendants failed to consider their qualifications and physical
suitability, and instead only considered tenure, union membership,
and prior work
experience. That allegedly led to the positions frequently being
awarded to men with equal or lesser qualifications and seniority.

Kelley Urella was an employee of Verizon New England Inc. for 30
years. She is now retired. While employed at Verizon, she was a
member of Local 2325 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical
Workers.

A copy of the Court's memorandum and order dated March 12, 2024 is
available from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=wMkzWQ
at no extra charge.[CC] 


VISION PATH: Bid for Class Cert. Briefing Schedule Continuance OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as WESLEY AFRICA, an
individual, v. VISION PATH, INC. d/b/a HUBBLE, a Delaware
corporation; BENJAMIN COGAN, an individual; JESSE HORWITZ, an
individual; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Case No. 2:23-cv-04570-GW-MRW
(C.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge George Wu entered an order that a
continuance of the class certification briefing schedule is granted
for the following reasons:

   1. The Parties are actively engaging in class certification
      discovery efforts, and further discovery is warranted in
advance
      of class certification briefing.

   2. The Parties agree that continuance of the briefing schedule
is
      necessary.

   3. Accordingly, the class certification briefing schedule will
be
      amended as follows:

      a. Aug. 5, 2024: Deadline for the Plaintiff to file the
motion
                       for class certification;

      b. Sept. 16, 2024: Deadline for the Defendant file an
opposition
                       to the motion for class certification;

      c. Oct. 14, 2024: Deadline for the Plaintiff to file a reply
in
                       support of its motion for class
certification;

      d. Oct. 28, 2024 at 8:30 a.m.: Hearing on the Plaintiff's
motion
                       for class certification.

On March 13, 2024, the Parties jointly submitted a Stipulation for
continuance of the motion for class certification briefing
schedule.

Vision provides optical instruments.

A copy of the Court's order dated March 13, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=4N42s0 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Eric H. De Wames, Esq.
          Ryan J. Carlson, Esq.
          MICHAEL SULLIVAN & ASSOCIATES, LLP
          111 N. Market Street, Suite 306
          San Jose, CA 95113
          E-mail: edewamese@sullivanattorneys.com
                  rcarlson@sullivanattorneys.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Jenny A. Covington, Esq.
          NELSON MULLINS RILEY &
          SCARBOROUGH LLP
          1600 Utica Avenue South, Suite 600
          Minneapolis, MN 55416
          Telephone: (612) 464-7626
          Facsimile: (612) 255-0739
          E-mail: jenny.covington@nelsonmullins.com

WALGREEN CO: Bargetto Seeks to Seal Class Certification Documents
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ELISA BARGETTO, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated, v. WALGREEN CO., Case
No. 3:22-cv-02639-TLT (N.D. Cal.), the Plaintiff files
administrative motion to consider whether another party's material
should be sealed.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(f), the Plaintiff moves
the Court to consider whether the entirety of the following
materials filed as Exhibits to the Declaration of Patrick Carey in
connection with Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification should
be sealed:

Ex. No.     Document                    Basis for Sealing

  4       WAG0009358-66.       Designated by Walgreen Co. as
"Highly
                               Confidential –Attorneys' Eyes
Only"
                               pursuant to the Stipulated
Protective
                               Order.

  5       WAG0009267-76.       Designated by Walgreen Co. as
"Highly
                               Confidential –Attorneys' Eyes
Only"
                               pursuant to the Stipulated
Protective
                               Order.

The Plaintiff further moves the Court to consider whether certain
portions of the following materials filed in connection with the
Plaintiff's Class Certification Motion should be sealed:

Ex. No.   Document        Portion(s)       Basis for Sealing
                            to Seal

  N/A    Plaintiff's        Highlighted    Contains
reference/analysis
         Motion for         portions       of material designated
by
         Class              on pages 1,    Walgreen Co. as
         Certification;     4, 5, 6, 7,    "Confidential or Highly
         Memorandum of      9, 11, 15,     Confidential –
         Points and         and 16.        Attorneys' Eyes Only"
         Authorities                       pursuant to the
Stipulated
                                           Protective Order

This motion is supported by the Declaration of Patrick Carey in
Support of Plaintiff's administrative motion to consider whether
another Party's material should be sealed pursuant to Local Rules
7-11 and 79-5(f), dated March 12, 2024.

Walgreen provides online medical products.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 12, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=PY0huL at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Patrick Carey, Esq.
          Mary Haley Ousley, Esq.
          LEXINGTON LAW GROUP, LLP
          503 Divisadero Street
          San Francisco, CA 94117
          Telephone: (415) 913-7800
          Facsimile: (415) 759-4112
          E-mail: pcarey@lexlawgroup.com
                  mhousley@lexlawgroup.com

                - and -

          Gideon Kracov, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF GIDEON KRACOV
          801 S. Grand Ave., 11th Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90017
          Telephone: (213) 629-2071
          Facsimile: (213) 623-7755
          E-mail: gk@gideonlaw.net

WALGREEN CO: Bargetto Suit Seeks to Certify Bag Purchaser Class
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ELISA BARGETTO, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated, v. WALGREEN CO., Case
No. 3:22-cv-02639-TLT (N.D. Cal.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to
enter an order:

-- Certifying a class of all persons who purchased Walgreens'
Bags
    for personal, family or household purposes in California
(either
    directly or through an agent) from April 29, 2018 through the
    present; and

-- Appointing Lexington Law Group, LLP as class counsel.

The claims of each member of the Class all relate to one specific
illegal labeling practice. If labels on one Bag purchased by one
Class member are illegal, then the labels on all Bags purchased by
all Class members are illegal, the Plaintiff contends.

A single injunction prohibiting Walgreens from deceptively labeling
its Bags as recyclable would provide relief to each member of the
Class. Thus, the requirements of Rule 23(b)(2) are satisfied, the
Plaintiff adds.

For years, retailers like Walgreens have been perpetrating a fraud
on the Californian public by marketing and labeling plastic grocery
or "carryout bags" as recyclable, when in fact, Walgreens own
documents reveal that only a paltry percentage of these bags are
actually recycled.

The operative complaint is Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint
("SAC"), which she filed on Sept. 30, 2022. The SAC includes five
separate causes of action based on California's Unfair Competition
Law including under the UCL's unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent
prongs; California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act; breach of express
warranty under California's Commercial Code; and the common-law
claim of quasi-contract, or unjust enrichment.
The Plaintiff has purchased Walgreens' Bags on at least two
occasions directly from Walgreens stores in California: one in San
Francisco, and one in Scotts Valley. At the time of her purchases,
the Plaintiff believed that Walgreens' bags were recyclable.

Walgreen provides online medical products.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 12, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=6tzwh2 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Patrick Carey, Esq.
          Mary Haley Ousley, Esq.
          LEXINGTON LAW GROUP, LLP
          503 Divisadero Street
          San Francisco, CA 94117
          Telephone: (415) 913-7800
          Facsimile: (415) 759-4112
          E-mail: pcarey@lexlawgroup.com
                  mhousley@lexlawgroup.com

                - and -

          Gideon Kracov, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF GIDEON KRACOV
          801 S. Grand Ave., 11th Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90017
          Telephone: (213) 629-2071
          Facsimile: (213) 623-7755
          E-mail: gk@gideonlaw.net

WALMART INC: Rector Suit Removed to D. Columbia
-----------------------------------------------
The case captioned Christina Rector, and all others similarly
situated v. Walmart Inc., Case No. 2024-CAB-000434 was removed from
the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, to the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia on March 7, 2024, and
assigned Case No. 1:24-cv-00658.

In the State Court Action, Plaintiff alleges that Walmart charges a
greater amount at checkout than the price posted, marked, or
displayed for those items. On this basis, Plaintiff alleges
violations of the District of Columbia's Consumer Protection
Procedures Act ("CPPA").[BN]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Jonathan D. Brightbill, Esq.
          WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
          1901 L Street, N.W.
          Washington, D.C. 20036
          Phone: (202) 282-5855
          Email: JBrightbill@winston.com

               - and -

          Daniel M. Blouin, Esq.
          Frank Battaglia, Esq.
          WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
          35 West Wacker Drive
          Chicago, IL 60601-9703
          Phone: +1 312-558-5600
          Facsimile: + 1 312-558-5700
          Email: DBlouin@winston.com
                 FBattaglia@winston.com


WASHINGTON: Sterling Appeals Reconsideration Order to 9th Circuit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff Damario Rasheed Sterling has filed an appeal from a court
order in the lawsuit entitled Damario Rasheed Sterling, on behalf
of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Cami L.
Feek, Commissioner, Washington State Employment Security
Department, in her capacity, and in her official capacity, et al.,
Defendants, Case No. 3:22-cv-05250, in the U.S. District Court for
the Western District of Washington.

On April 14, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a complaint in court. On June
13, 2022, Plaintiffs amended their complaint, alleging the
Washington Employment Security Department (ESD or The Department)
sent them redetermination letters adjusting their unemployment
benefits without adequate prior notice or opportunity to be heard.
Plaintiffs allege these "vague, untimely, and threatening"
overpayment notices, which often informed Plaintiffs they owed
thousands of dollars to the government, were generated by a
defective claims management program.

The Plaintiffs filed an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983,
alleging Defendants violated their rights pursuant to the
Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause by depriving them of a
constitutionally protected property interest without adequate
notice or an opportunity to be heard. Plaintiffs further alleged
Defendants violated their right to a fair hearing and their right
to a timely determination. Plaintiffs also made class action
allegations.

The matter came before the Court on Defendants' motion for summary
judgment and motion to stay discovery proceedings pending the
Court's ruling on the motion for summary judgment.

On September 5, 2023, the Court DENIED Defendants' motion for
summary judgment. Defendants' motion to stay proceedings was also
DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time was GRANTED in
part. The parties' stipulated motion to extend case deadlines was
likewise GRANTED.

On January 5, 2024, U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo amended
the Courts order on Defendants' motion for summary judgment and
certified it for interlocutory appeal. The case was STAYED pending
a determination from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on whether
it will accept certification. If the Ninth Circuit certified the
appeal, the case will remain stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's
decision. The parties  were directed file a joint status report
regarding discovery within 30 days of a decision from the Ninth
Circuit regarding the issues raised in the Plaintiffs request for
an interlocutory appeal.

The Plaintiff previously filed an appeal in the case captioned
Sterling v. Feek, et al., Case No. 24-259, in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, on January 17, 2024.

The new appellate case is captioned as Sterling v. Feek, et al.,
Case No. 24-1296, filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the Ninth Circuit, on March 5, 2024.

The briefing schedule in the Appellate Case states that:

   -- Mediation Questionnaire for Appellant was due on March 11,
2024;

   -- Appeal Transcript Order for Appellant was due on March 15,
2024;

   -- Appeal Transcript for Appellant is due on April 15, 2024;

   -- Appeal Opening Brief for Appellant is due on May 24, 2024;

   -- Appeal Answering Brief for Appellee is due on June 24, 2024;
and

   -- All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to Federal Rule
of Appellate Procedure 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the
petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule
will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. [BN]

WELLS FARGO: Young Sues Over Deceptive Trade Practices
------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Young, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Case
No. 3:24-cv-01380-LJC (N.D. Cal., March 7, 2024), is brought
against Wells Fargo for its violations of laws, including the Fair
Credit Reporting Act, state unfair and deceptive trade practices
laws, common law conversion, and unjust enrichment.

Wells Fargo unilaterally enrolled customers in various financial
products or services they did not agree to and never knew about.
Wells Fargo paid itself fees, costs, interest, and other
consideration from the customers for these unwanted products and
services, such as Sign/Drive Bonus, Health Protector Bonus, or Home
Warranty (to name just a few examples).

Wells Fargo was subject to class and regulatory actions based on
its fake accounts scandal that came to light in 2016. In September
2016, Wells Fargo was forced to acknowledge that it had created 1.5
million fake deposit accounts and more than 500,000 fake credit
card accounts in customers' names without their knowledge or
approval. In addition, in 2022, Wells Fargo paid more than $2
billion to consumers and $1.7 billion in civil penalties after the
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") found Wells Fargo was
mismanaging loan accounts by charging illegal fees and interest.

On February 26, 2024, Wells Fargo sent a letter to Plaintiff
informing him that Wells Fargo's records indicated that he was
"enrolled" in the "Hospital Accident" product he never approved of,
never wanted, and never knew about. According to the letter, Wells
Fargo had him enrolled from February 1, 2008 – May 31, 2008.

The Plaintiff and others like him were "enrolled" in products and
services that they never agreed to, never wanted, and never knew
about for months, sometimes years. During this time, Wells Fargo
was extracting fees, interest, payments, and other considerations
for these enrollments at Plaintiff's and Class members' expense.
Plaintiff and Class members suffered actual damages, and were
forced to pay fees, penalties, interest, and costs as a result of
Wells Fargo's unlawful actions, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff never agreed to or wanted a "Hospital Accident"
product at any time.

Wells Fargo & Company is a financial services company with $1.875
trillion in assets, and provides banking, insurance, investments,
mortgage, and consumer and commercial finance.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Alisa Rose Adams, Esq.
          THE DANN LAW FIRM
          26100 Towne Center Drive
          Foothill Ranch, CA 92610-3442
          Phone: (949) 200-8755
          Facsimile: (866) 843-8308
          Email: aadams@dannlaw.com

               - and -

          Marc E. Dann, Esq.
          Brian D. Flick, Esq.
          DANNLAW
          15000 Madison Avenue
          Lakewood, OH 44107
          Phone (216) 373-0539
          Facsimile (216) 373-0536
          Email: notices@dannlaw.com

               - and -

          Thomas A. Zimmerman, Jr., Esq.
          ZIMMERMAN LAW OFFICES, P.C.
          77 W. Washington Street, Suite 1220
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Phone: (312) 440-0020
          Facsimile: (312) 440-4180
          Email: tom@attorneyzim.com


WHITESTONE HOME: All Fact Discovery in Wilson Suit Due Dec. 18
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JEREMY WILSON, v.
WHITESTONE HOME FURNISHINGS, LLC, Case No. 2:23-cv-02552-DAD-DB
(E.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge Dale Drozd entered a scheduling order
as follows:

-- Any motions or stipulations requesting          Nov. 18, 2024
    leave to amend the pleadings must be
    filed no later than:

-- The parties shall serve their initial           March 27, 2024
    disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of
    Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(1) no later
    than:

-- All fact discovery shall be completed           Dec. 18, 2024
    no later than:

-- All motions, except motions for                 May 2, 2025
    continuances, temporary restraining orders,
    or other emergency applications, shall be
    filed on or before:

Whitestone operates within the home furnishing merchant wholesalers
industry.

A copy of the Court's order dated Mar. 8, 2024 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=2QpQH7 at no extra
charge.[CC]

WINNER INTERNATIONAL: Liz Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Winner International,
Inc. The case is styled as Pedro Liz, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Winner International, Inc., Case No.
1:24-cv-01770-AT (S.D.N.Y., March 7, 2024).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Winner International, Inc. -- https://winner-intl.com/ -- provides
commercial, residential, recreational and personal security, and
safety products.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gabriel Levy, Esq.
          GABRIEL A. LEVY, P.C.
          1129 Northern Blvd., Suite 404
          Manhasset, NY 11030
          Phone: (516) 287-3458
          Email: glevy@glpcfirm.com


WORLD LINK: Faces Romero Wage-and-Hour Suit in Cal. Super.
----------------------------------------------------------
MARLON ROMERO, on behalf of himself, and as an "aggrieved employee"
on behalf of other similarly situated "aggrieved employees" under
the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004,
Plaintiff v. WORLD LINK TRANSPORT, INC., a California corporation;
MICHAEL MAKOTO GOTO, an individual; and DOES 1 to 25, inclusive,
Defendants, Case No. 24STCV05354 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty.,
March 4, 2024) arises from the Defendants' alleged unlawful labor
practices in violation of the California Labor Code and the
California Business and Professions Code.

The Plaintiff's claims are based on Defendants' alleged failures
to: (1) pay all wages earned for all hours worked at the correct
rates of pay; (2) provide all rest breaks and meal periods; (3)
indemnify for business expenses; (4) provide accurate and complete
written wage statements; (5) timely pay wages during and upon
termination of employment; and (6) fairly compete. Accordingly,
Plaintiff seeks to recover unpaid wages, civil penalties, and
related relief through this action.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendants as warehouse
supervisor from July 2016 to December 1, 2023.

World Link Transport, Inc. is a freight forwarding service in
Carson, California.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Maralle Messrelian, Esq.
          MM LAW, APC
          500 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 2000
          Glendale, CA 91203
          Telephone: (818) 810-7747
          Facsimile: (818) 230-9018  
          E-mail: maralle@mmlawapc.com

XAVIER BECERRA: Lucas Seeks to Modify Class Certification Order
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as LUCAS R., et al., v.
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-05741-DMG-BFM (C.D. Cal.), the
Plaintiffs will move the Court on May 3 for entry of an order
modifying the Court's order granting class certification for the
limited purpose of substituting Class Counsel.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated March 12, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=qdhvad at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Carlos Rr. Holguin, Esq.
          CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
          256 South Occidental Boulevard
          Los Angeles, CA 90057
          Telephone: (213) 388-8693
          E-mail: crholguin@centerforhumanrights.org
               - and -

          Holly S. Cooper, Esq.
          Carter C. White, Esq.
          IMMIGRATION LAW CLINIC
          UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW
          One Shields Ave. TB 30
          Davis, CA 95616
          Telephone: (530) 754-4833
          E-mail: hscooper@ucdavis.edu
                  ccwhite@ucdavis.edu

               - and -

          Poonam Juneja, Esq.
          Freya Pitts, Esq.
          Mishan Wroe, Esq.
          Melissa Adamson, Esq.
          Diane De Gramont, Esq.
          Brenda Shum, Esq.
          NATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH LAW
          1212 Broadway, Suite 600
          Oakland, CA 94612
          Telephone: (510) 835-8098
          E-mail: pjuneja@youthlaw.org
                  fpitts@youthlaw.org
                  mwroe@youthlaw.org
                  madamson@youthlaw.org
                  ddegramont@youthlaw.org
                  bshum@youthlaw.org

                - and -

          Summer J. Wynn, Esq.
          Michael J. Mcmahon, Esq.
          Rebecca L. Tarneja, Esq.
          Alexandra R. Mayhugh, Esq.
          Jamie D. Robertson, Esq.
          COOLEY LLP
          1333 2nd Street, Suite 400
          Santa Monica, CA 90401
          Telephone: (310) 883-6400
          Facsimile: (310) 883-6500
          Email: swynn@cooley.com
                 mmcmahon@cooley.com
                 rtarneja@cooley.com
                 amayhugh@cooley.com
                 jdrobertson@cooley.com

ZILLOW GROUP: Jaeger Suit Seeks to Certify Stock Purchaser Class
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JEREMY JAEGER,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
ZILLOW GROUP, INC., RICHARD BARTON, ALLEN PARKER, and JEREMY
WACKSMAN, Case No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ (W.D. Wash.), the lead
Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order:

   (i) certifying a class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3)

       defined as:

          All persons or entities who purchased or otherwise
acquired
          Zillow Group, Inc. Class A common stock or Class C
capital
          stock during the period from Aug. 5, 2021, to Nov. 2,
2021,
          inclusive, and were damaged thereby;

  (ii) appointing Jeremy Jaeger as Class Representative; and

(iii) appointing Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP as Class
Counsel.

The Court says that " any complexities of class action treatment,"
which are few, "do not outweigh the benefits of considering common
issues in one trial."

In late 2020 and early 2021, Zillow continuously fell short of its
target and kept losing ground to iBuying competitors it viewed as
existential threats. In the spring of 2021, they launched an
aggressive plan to "catch up" to its iBuying competitors. They
called the plan "Project Ketchup."

As part of Project Ketchup, Zillow secretly "applied systematic
'overlays' to drive up the Company's offers" to homeowners "well
above the price indicated by its algorithm and pricing analysts."
These overlays increased Zillow's home offer prices by as much as
seven or eight percent.

The relevant truth was partially revealed in October 2021, when
news outlets and Zillow reported that the Company was pausing
homebuying due to renovation backlogs and capacity constraints.
Just two weeks later, on November 2, 2021, Zillow announced it was
winding down Zillow Offers and laying off 25% of its workforce.

In response to these disclosures, Zillow's stock prices plummeted,
and Lead Plaintiff and the Class suffered significant damages.

Zillow is an American tech real-estate marketplace company.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated March 14, 2024 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=glBV10 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Steve W. Berman, Esq.
          Catherine Y. N. Gannon, Esq.
          Karl P. Barth, Esq.
          Reed R. Kathrein, Esq.
          Lucas E. Gilmore, Esq.
          Raffi Melanson, Esq.
          HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
          1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000
          Seattle, WA 98101
          Telephone: (206) 623-7292
          Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
          E-mail: steve@hbsslaw.com
                  catherineg@hbsslaw.com
                  karlb@hbsslaw.com
                  reed@hbsslaw.com
                  lucasg@hbsslaw.com
                  raffim@hbsslaw.com

                - and -

          Stacey M. Kaplan, Esq.
          Gregory M. Castaldo, Esq.
          Evan R. Hoey, Esq.
          Helen J. Bass, Esq.
          KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP
          One Sansome Street, Suite 1850
          San Francisco, CA 94104
          Telephone: (415) 400-3000
          Facsimile: (415) 400-3001
          E-mail: skaplan@ktmc.com
                  gcastaldo@ktmc.com
                  ehoey@ktmc.com
                  hbass@ktmc.com

[^] Darrow Sponsors 8th Annual Class Action Conference
------------------------------------------------------
Darrow Inc., a provider of artificial intelligence-powered legal
research platform, is a sponsor of the Class Action Money & Ethics
Conference this May.

New York-based Darrow's -- https://www.darrow.ai/ -- AI-Powered
Justice Intelligence Platform sifts through publicly available
information, such as consumer complaints, administrative documents,
SEC filings and more, and connects relevant data points to detect
legal violations, predict their outcomes, and assess their
financial impact, streamlining business development for litigation
teams.  

Join Darrow and others at the 8th Annual Class Action Money &
Ethics Conference on May 6, 2024.  Registration is now open.

This one-day event is also being sponsored by:

     * Atticus Administration, LLC;
     * Broadridge, a global Fintech company;
     * Davis Wright Tremaine LLP;
     * Duane Morris LLP;
     * Giftogram;
     * Hook Point;
     * JND Legal Administration;
     * Parabellum Capital;
     * Simpluris; and
     * Tremendous, a payouts platform

CAME 2024 will be held in-person at The Harmonie Club.  To
register, visit https://www.classactionconference.com/

For sponsorship or speakership opportunities, please contact:

     Will Etchison
     Tel: 305-707-7493
     E-mail: will@beardgroup.com


[^] Davis Wright Sponsors 8th Annual Class Action Conference
------------------------------------------------------------
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, an Am Law 100 firm, is a sponsor of the
Class Action Money & Ethics Conference this May.

Davis Wright Tremaine -- https://www.dwt.com/ -- is an American
business and litigation law firm founded in 1944.  DWT specializes
in Brand Protection & Advertising, Corporate and Business
Transactions, Employment, Benefits & Immigration, Energy,
Environmental & Natural Resources, ESG, International Trade,
Investment & National Security, Litigation, Real Estate, and
Technology + Privacy & Security matters.

Join DWT and others at the 8th Annual Class Action Money & Ethics
Conference on May 6, 2024.  Registration is now open.

This one-day event is also being sponsored by:

     * Atticus Administration, LLC;
     * Broadridge, a global Fintech company;
     * Darrow.ai;
     * Duane Morris LLP;
     * Giftogram;
     * Hook Point;
     * JND Legal Administration;
     * Parabellum Capital;
     * Simpluris; and
     * Tremendous, a payouts platform

CAME 2024 will be held in-person at The Harmonie Club.  To
register, visit https://www.classactionconference.com/

For sponsorship or speakership opportunities, please contact:

     Will Etchison
     Tel: 305-707-7493
     E-mail: will@beardgroup.com



                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Rousel Elaine T.
Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L.
Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2024. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***