---

              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, November 29, 2023, Vol. 25, No. 239

                            Headlines

2U INC: Continues to Defend Favell I Class Suit in California
2U INC: Continues to Defend Favell II Class Suit in California
3505 CLARK: Hernandez Files Suit Over Alleged Tip Skimming
ABOVE ALL PROPERTY: Gonzalez Sues Over Labor Law Breaches
ACELYRIN INC: Faces Aramouni Suit Over Drop in Share Price

AKSHAR VISHNU: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Carlyle Alleges
ALAMO INTERMEDIATE: Faces Garza VPPA Suit Over Disclosure of Info
ALLSTATE CORP: Faces Bibbs Insurance Claims Suit
ALLSTATE CORP: Faces Cummings Insurance Claims Suit
ALLSTATE CORP: Faces Durgin Insurance Claims Suit

ALLSTATE CORP: Faces Kronenberg Insurance Claims Suit
ALTITUDE GROUP: Starr-Harris Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida
API FINANCIAL: Schleicher Files Suit in E.D. Missouri
ARAGON ADVERTISING: Must Produce Necessary Docs in Jackson Suit
ARDAGH GLASS: Castaneda Suit Removed to N.D. California

ARGO GROUP: Files Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Dismissal Bid
ASPLUNDH CONSTRUCTION: Court Directs Filing of Discovery Plan
ASTEC INDUSTRIES: TGERS Files Suit in S.D. Georgia
AUTOMATIC DATA: Kiani Suit Removed to E.D. California
BASCOM'S STEAKHOUSE: Seghrouchni Suit Removed to M.D. Florida

BGC GROUP: Continues to Defend Breach of Contract Class Suit
BOJANGLES' RESTAURANTS: Appeals Class Cert. Ruling in Stafford Suit
BOTTS ABSTRACT: Spurrier Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime
BOYD GAMING: Court Directs Filing of Discovery Plan in Vallianatos
BREVILLE USA: Popkin Sues Over Wage and Hour Violations in Calif.

BRIGHAM YOUNG: Bid for Leave to File Renewed Class Cert Bid Tossed
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL: Loses Petition for En Banc Rehearing
BTX TECHNOLOGIES: Castro Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
BUCKLE INC: Garcia CIPA Suit Removed to S.D. California
BUNDOX RESTAURANT: Jayram Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.

BURGER MAN INC: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Bantsadze Alleges
C.O. BIGELOW CHEMISTS: Melendez Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
CAFE ISTANBUL: Taghizade Sues Over Servers' Unpaid Wages
COREBRIDGE FINANCIAL: Applegate Suit Transferred to D. Mass.
COSTCO WHOLESALE: Reyes Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.

CRANE STATIONARY: Stroude Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
DAKOTA EYE INSTITUTE: Cleveland Files Suit in D. North Dakota
DELAWARE LIFE: McGarry Sues Over Failure to Safeguard PII
DJGN LLC: Class Settlement in Benjamin Gets Final Nod
DOWN TO EARTH: Alcantara Sues Over Nonpayment of Overtime Wages

DRUG FREE WORKPLACES: Cohen Files Suit in N.D. Florida
EAGLERIDER INC: Freedman Sues Over Undisclosed Fees on EagleShare
ED LEVIN JEWELRY: Robertson Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
EIGHTH STREET: Giraldo Files ADA Suit in D. New Jersey
ELI LILLY: Faces Suit Over Price Manipulation of Analog Insulins

ENHANCING YOUR HABITAT: Robertson Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
ENVISION HEALTHCARE: Court Lifts Stay & Reopens Bettis Suit
EVERETT FINANCIAL: Keller Files TCPA Suit in D. South Carolina
F.C. INDUSTRIES: Bid for Class Certification Due July 12, 2024
FLAVOR PAPER: Melendez Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York

FORD MOTOR: Shiff Sues Over Sale of Vehicles With Defective Camera
G2 SECURE: Diaz Sues Over Wage and Hour Law Violations
GEISINGER SYSTEM: Class Certification Bid Extended to June 14, 2024
GLOBAL ATLANTIC: Bernstein Suit Removed to S.D. New York
GULLY TRANSPORTATION: Seals Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Compensation

HARBORSTONE CREDIT: Class Settlement in Garcia Gets Final Nod
HEALTHFLEX HOME: Faces Salangsang Suit Over Non Exempt Complaints
HILB GROUP: Crowley Sues Over Personal Injury Claims in E.D. Va.
IFIT INC: Douglass Suit Seeks to Certify Settlement Class
IMPERIAL FIRE: Faces Bass Insurance Claims Suit

INTER-CON SECURITY: Rodriguez Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
INTERSTATE HOTELS: De Paz Suit Removed to C.D. California
INTOUCHCX SOLUTIONS: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Pearson Alleges
IOVATE HEALTH: Schoonover Seeks Approval of Class Notice
ISS FACILITY: Bid for Class Certification Continued to Jan 25, 2024

JACOBS SOLUTIONS: Court Enters Class Cert Sched Order in Evans
JAMES RIVER: Glantz Sues Over Misleading Statements on Securities
JEANINE KLEBER DISTRICT: Simpson Suit Transferred to N.D. Indiana
JFC INTERNATIONAL: Lee Gets OK to Add Class Allegations
KANDI TECHNOLOGIES: Venkataraman Seeks to Certify Class Action

KENDO HOLDINGS: Radvansky Files TCPA Suit in N.D. Georgia
KENTUCKY HOSPITALITY: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Hadder Alleges
KINGSBOROUGH ATLAS: Diaz Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
KONICA MINOLTA: Luense Seeks to Certify Class
KROGER CO: Faces Privacy Lawsuit Over Disclosure of Sensitive Info

KUBOTA TRACTOR: Tucker Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
KYNAH INC: Gonzalez Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
LADY JANE'S: Plaintiffs Seek Conditional Status of Employees
LANE COLLEGE: Faces Young Suit Over ADA Violation in S.D.N.Y.
LAPSTONE & HAMMER: Gomberg Files ADA Suit in E.D. Pennsylvania

LIBERTY HOME GUARD: Johnson Files TCPA Suit in E.D. New York
LONG POINT: Kohlberg Class Suit Moved From S.D.N.Y. to N.D.N.Y.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA: Berg Suit Seeks Class Certification
LYONS SECURITY: Hayden-Thrasher Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
MAINE-LY RED WING: Zelvin Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York

MAJID JAMALI: Stroude Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
MANHATTAN BEER: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Curcio Alleges
MARS PETCARE: Moore Bid to Strike Butler Declaration Partly OK'd
MASS GENERAL: Cashman Sues Over Below Hospital Standard of Care
MAXIMUS INC: Santanelli Suit Transferred to D. Massachusetts

META PLATFORMS: Sued Over Dangerous Social Media Products
META PLATFORMS: Sued Over Dangerous Social Media Products
META PLATFORMS: Sued Over Egregious Breach of Public Trust
META PLATFORMS: Sued Over Public Nuisance and Negligence
MH CONSULTANTS: Plaintiffs Must File Class Cert. by Nov. 15, 2024

MIDFIRST BANK: Strother Privacy Suit Removed to W.D. Okla.
MIKKEL SVANE: Amethyst Arbitrage Files Suit in Del. Chancery Ct.
MILLENNIA TAX RELIEF: Costa Files TCPA Suit in C.D. California
MINDXPO INC: Sanchez Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
MINNIE ROSE LLC: Danso Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York

MOLINA HEALTHCARE: Court Enters Class Cert Rulings in Kruzel Suit
MOREHOUSE COLLEGE: Violates Disabled's Civil Rights, Young Claims
MR. COOPER: Siegal Sues Over Failure to Secure and Safeguard PII
NEWBERRY COLLEGE: Bishop Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
NFL ENTERPRISES: Filing for Class Cert Bid Due August 19, 2024

NORTHERN TREE: Appeals Court Order in Lemus Labor Suit to 2nd Cir.
NORTHWELL HEALTH: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Hvidsten Alleges
NOVAVAX INC: Opposes Sinnathurai Class Certification Bid
OKAYPLAYER LLC: Tucker Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
OLD DOMINION: Rodriguez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.

OLIN CORP: Davis Suit Seeks to Certify Rule 23 Class Action
OLIN CORP: Faces Caustic Soda-Related Suit in Quebec
ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL: Continues to Defend Alleman Class Suit
P.A.M. TRANSPORTATION: Settles Truckers' Labor Suit
PAC 12 CONFERENCE: Griggs Suit Moved From C.D. Cal. to N.D. Ill.

PETER THOMAS ROTH: Reyes Suit Removed to C.D. California
PETSMART LLC: Merino Sues Over Unpaid Minimum and Overtime Wages
PHILADELPHIA, PA: Must File Class Cert Bid Response by Dec. 18
PORT AUTHORITY: Class Cert Fact Discovery Due Jan. 31, 2024
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY: Pearson Files FDCPA Suit in E.D. Pennsylvania

POSTMEDS INC: Rossi Files Suit in N.D. California
PROGRESS SOFTWARE: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Glass Alleges
PROGRESSIVE LEASING: Alexander Files Suit in D. Utah
PROSUPPS USA: Scheibe Appeals Judgment in Mislabeling Class Action
QUALCOMM INC: N.D. Cal. Dismisses Securities Suit

QUASI CORPORATION: Sinkfield Suit Moved From M.D. Pa. to D. Minn.
RENTGROW INC: Faces Jones Suit Over Consumer Credit Complaints
RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES: Mediation in Tredo Suit Ongoing
ROBINHOOD FINANCIAL: Plaintiffs' Class Cert Bid Nixed w/o Prejudice
RTX CORP: Plaintiffs Seek to Seal Class Certification Brief

RTX CORPORATION: Plaintiffs File Bid for Class Certification
SOUTH CENTRAL: Kevin Garlington Sues Over Breach of Contract
STANDARD INSURANCE: Gaffin Sues Over Data Breach on MOVEit Software
STATE FARM: Court Amends Preliminary Pretrial Order in Nichols
TRAEGER PELLET: Emergency Bid to Stay Yates Proceedings Tossed

TRANSAMERICA PREMIER: Bid Stay Phan Class Suit OK'd
VETERANS AFFAIRS: Davis Seeks to Enforce Settlement Deal
WARDEN COLBERT: Court Tosses Peake's Bid to Amend Class Complaint
WELLPARTNER INC: Breaches Pharmacy Contract, Cloney's Suit Alleges
WESLEY FINANCIAL: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Gaujot and Davis Claim

WHALECO INC: Retail App Violates Data Privacy Rights, Ziboukh Says
WHITESTONE HOME: Wilson Sues Over Fake Sale Prices, Discounts
WYNN RESORTS LTD: Continues to Defend Ferries Securities Class Suit
XACTUS LLC: Cinner Sues Over Consumer Credit Violations

                            *********

2U INC: Continues to Defend Favell I Class Suit in California
-------------------------------------------------------------
2U Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly period
ending September 30, 2023 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 9, 2023, that the Company continue to defend
itself from the Favell I class suit in the Superior Court of the
State of California.

On December 20, 2022, Plaintiffs Iola Favell, Sue Zarnowski, and
Mariah Cummings filed a putative class action in the Superior Court
of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, against the
University of Southern California ("USC") and the Company on behalf
of "[a]ll students who were enrolled in an online graduate degree
program at USC Rossier, from April 1, 2009 through April 27, 2022."
("Favell I") Compl. ¶ 135.

Plaintiffs purported to allege violations of California's False
Advertising Law ("FAL"), Cal. Civ. Code § 17500, California’s
Unfair Competition Law ("UCL"), Cal. Civ. Code § 17200,
California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA"), Cal. Civ. Code
§ 1770, as well as for unjust enrichment related to the use of USC
Rossier’s rankings in certain marketing materials.


On February 3, 2023, the Company removed the case to the United
States District Court for the Central District of California.

Then, on March 8, 2023, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the
lawsuit, arguing, among other things, that all of Plaintiffs'
allegations lacked merit and that certain claims for relief could
not be brought in federal court in light of other allegations
Plaintiffs had made.

On March 28, 2023, before the court could rule on that motion,
Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint (the "First Amended
Complaint"), dropping the challenged claims for relief and instead
asserting only a single cause of action under the CLRA.

The First Amended Complaint is based on the same factual
allegations as the original complaint but seeks declaratory relief,
actual damages, incidental damages, consequential damages,
compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorneys' fees and
costs in connection with their CLRA claim.

On April 17, 2023, the Company moved to dismiss the First Amended
Complaint in Favell I in its entirety, arguing that all of
Plaintiffs' claims lack merit.

On July 6, 2023, the Court held a hearing on the Company's motion
to dismiss the First Amended Complaint in Favell I and issued a
ruling granting the Company's motion to dismiss with leave to amend
.

On July 28, 2023, Plaintiffs filed amended complaints in Favell I,
adding an additional plaintiff and more detailed allegations but
otherwise reasserting the same claims in the case.  

The Company believes that both lawsuits are without merit and
intends to vigorously defend against these claims.

2U, INC. provides online educational services. The Company offers
graduate and undergraduate degree programs in social work, data
science, public administration, healthcare, law, and industrial
relations. [BN]


2U INC: Continues to Defend Favell II Class Suit in California
--------------------------------------------------------------
2U Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly period
ending September 30, 2023 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 9, 2023, that the Company continue to defend
itself from the Favell II class suit in the Superior Court of the
State of California.

On March 28, 2023, Plaintiffs Iola Favell, Sue Zarnowski, and
Mariah Cummings filed a separate class action lawsuit in the
Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles,
reasserting the FAL, UCL, and CLRA claims they dropped from the
federal lawsuit ("Favell II"). The state court lawsuit is based on
the same factual allegations as the federal lawsuit. Plaintiffs
seek declaratory and injunctive relief, restitution, and attorneys'
fees and costs in connection with the claims in state court.

On May 4, 2023, the Company removed the Favell II lawsuit from
state court to the United States District Court for the Central
District of California, and Plaintiffs later filed a motion to
remand it back to state court.

On July 6, 2023, the Court held a hearing on the Plaintiffs' motion
to remand in Favell II and issued a ruling denying Plaintiffs'
motion to remand.

On July 28, 2023, Plaintiffs filed amended complaints in Favell II,
adding an additional plaintiff and more detailed allegations but
otherwise reasserting the claims in the case.

2U moved to dismiss the amended complaints on August 31, 2023, and
a hearing is scheduled for November 16, 2023.

The Company believes that both lawsuits are without merit and
intends to vigorously defend against these claims.

However, due to the complex nature of the legal and factual issues
involved, the outcome of both matters is not presently
determinable.

2U, INC. provides online educational services. The Company offers
graduate and undergraduate degree programs in social work, data
science, public administration, healthcare, law, and industrial
relations. [BN]

3505 CLARK: Hernandez Files Suit Over Alleged Tip Skimming
----------------------------------------------------------
ADRIAN HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. 3505 CLARK, INC., Defendant, Case
No. 1:23-cv-16008 (N.D. Ill., Nov. 15, 2023) alleges that the
Defendant delays paying employees tips for weeks at a time, and
teals tips from its employees.

Plaintiff Hernandez was employed by the Defendant as a staff.

3505 CLARK, INC. operates as a restaurant located in Chicago,
Illinois. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Roberto Martinez, Esq.
          MARTINEZ LAW LLC
          4115 W 26th Street
          Chicago, IL 60623
          Telephone: (773) 818-3020
          Email: r@martinezlawllc.net

               - and -

          Francisco Fernandez del Castillo, Esq.
          DEL CASTILLO LAW GROUP, LLC
          4115 W 26th Street
          Chicago, IL 60623
          Telephone: (312) 216-0111
          Email: francisco@delcastillolawgroup.com

ABOVE ALL PROPERTY: Gonzalez Sues Over Labor Law Breaches
---------------------------------------------------------
CRESCENCIO GONZALEZ in his individual capacity, and on behalf of
himself and all other aggrieved employees Plaintiffs v. ABOVE ALL
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC AND ABE BAK, DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,
Defendants, Case No. 23BBCV02645 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty.,
November 13, 2023) alleges violations of the California Labor Code
and the California Unfair Competition Law.

Beginning in or around August of 2022, the Defendants engaged
Plaintiffs to perform services of maintenance on the buildings
Defendants were managing. According to the complaint, the
Defendants created and instituted the employment arrangement and
compensation plan which included the misclassification of
Plaintiffs as 1099 independent contractor as well as the failure to
have wage & hour policies related to but not limited to overtime,
meal and rest break, wage statements, waiting time penalties, and
reimbursement of expenses.

Above All Property Management is a California limited liability
company that is located in Los Angeles County. It manages
approximately six different residential buildings in the city of
Los Angeles and Los Angeles County. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Sam A. Donabedian, Esq.
          Adam H. Donabedian, Esq.
          DONABEDIAN LAW, APC
          2829 Townsgate Rd., Suite 100
          Westlake Village, CA 91361
          Telephone: (818) 649-3220
          Facsimile: (818) 649-3230
          E-mail: sdonabedian@donabedianlaw.com
                  adonabedian@donabedianlaw.com

ACELYRIN INC: Faces Aramouni Suit Over Drop in Share Price
----------------------------------------------------------
CARLA ARAMOUNI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. ACELYRIN, INC.; SHAO-LEE LIN; MARDI C. DIER;
and GIL LABRUCHERIE, Defendants, Case No. 2:23-cv-09672 (C.D. Cal.,
Nov. 15, 2023) is a class action on behalf of a class consisting of
all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or
otherwise acquired Acelyrin securities between May 4, 2023 and
September 11, 2023, both dates inclusive, pursuing claims against
the Defendants under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period, the
Defendants made materially false and misleading statements
regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects.
Specifically, the Defendants made false and misleading statements
and failed to disclose that: (i) izokibep was less effective in
treating HS than Defendants had led investors to believe; (ii)
accordingly, Acelyrin overstated izokibep's clinical and/or
commercial prospects; (iii) as a result, Acelyrin also overstated
the Company's business prospects post-IPO; and (iv) as a result,
the Company's public statements were materially false and
misleading at all relevant times.

Acelyrin's stock price fell $17.19 per share, or 61.61 percent,
over the following two trading sessions, to close at $10.71 per
share on September 13, 2023.

As a result of the Defendants' wrongful acts and omissions, and the
precipitous decline in the market value of Acelyrin's securities,
Plaintiff and other Class members have suffered significant losses
and damages, says the suit.

ACELYRIN, INC. operates as a biopharma company. The Company
provides life-changing new treatment options by identifying,
acquiring, and accelerating development and commercialization of
promising drug candidates. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jennifer Pafiti, Esq.
          POMERANTZ LLP
          1100 Glendon Avenue, 15th Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90024
          Telephone: (310) 405-7190
          Email: jpafiti@pomlaw.com

AKSHAR VISHNU: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Carlyle Alleges
---------------------------------------------------------
FALLON L. CARLYLE, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. AKSHAR VISHNU, LLC a/k/a Knights
Inn Kissimmee; AMIT SHAH; SHEFALI SHAH; and SHEEL SHAH, Defendants,
Case No. 6:23-cv-02209 (M.D. Fla., Nov. 15, 2023) seeks to recover
from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation,
interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the
Fair Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiff Carlyle was employed by the Defendants as a housekeeper.

AKSHAR VISHNU, LLC a/k/a Knights Inn Kissimmee operates as a hotel
located in Kissimmee, Florida. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Zandro E. Palma, Esq.
          ZANDRO E. PALMA, P.A.
          100 S. Dadeland Blvd. Suite 1500
          Miami, FL 33156
          Telephone: (305) 446-1500
          Facsimile: (305) 446-1502
          Email: zep@thepalmalawgroup.com

ALAMO INTERMEDIATE: Faces Garza VPPA Suit Over Disclosure of Info
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DAISY GARZA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintif, v. ALAMO INTERMEDIATE II HOLDINGS, LLC,
Defendant, Case No. 3:23-cv-05849 (N.D. Cal., November 13, 2023)
alleges violations of the Video Privacy Protection Act.

In its website, Alamo has installed various tracking pixels that
secretly and surreptitiously send consumers' personally
identifiable information to third-party providers, such as
Facebook, TikTok, Google, Trade Desk, and AdRoll. Through these
tracking pixels, third-party companies collect the titles of the
movies consumers purchased tickets to see, along with the cinema
locations where those movies aired. Some of these tracking pixels
included unique user ID numbers that these companies use to
identify particular individuals and link them to their movie
metadata. Other companies are able to identify particular
individuals and link them to their movie metadata by also
collecting their browsers' IP addresses and cross referencing that
with other websites that individual's IP address visited. The
third-party providers, in turn, use the information on video
consumption habits to build profiles on consumers and deliver
targeted advertisements to them, among other activities, says the
suit.

Alamo Intermediate II Holdings, LLC is a cinema chain that
develops, owns, and operates the website, drafthouse.com, where
consumers can purchase tickets to watch movies at various Alamo
theater locations throughout the United States. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Stefan Bogdanovich, Esq.
         L. Timothy Fisher, Esq.
         Stefan Bogdanovich, Esq.
         BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
         1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
         Walnut Creek, CA 94596
         Telephone: (925) 300-4455
         Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
         E-mail: ltfisher@bursor.com
                 sbogdanovich@bursor.com

ALLSTATE CORP: Faces Bibbs Insurance Claims Suit
------------------------------------------------
The Allstate Corporation disclosed in its Form 10-Q report for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 1, 2023, that the company is
defending an August 2023 putative class action captioned "Bibbs v.
Allstate Insurance Company and Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance
Company" (N.D. Ohio).

It alleges that the company underpays total loss vehicle physical
damage claims on auto policies. The alleged systematic
underpayments result from third party valuation tool used by the
company as part of a comprehensive adjustment process is allegedly
flawed, biased, or contrary to applicable law, that the company
allegedly does not pay sales tax, title fees, registration fees,
and/or other specified fees that are allegedly mandatory under
policy language or state legal authority.

The Allstate Corporation is an insurance company, headquartered in
Glenview, Illinois.


ALLSTATE CORP: Faces Cummings Insurance Claims Suit
---------------------------------------------------
The Allstate Corporation disclosed in its Form 10-Q report for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 1, 2023, that the company is
defending an April 2022 putative class action captioned "Cummings
v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company" (M.D. La).

It alleges that the company underpays total loss vehicle physical
damage claims on auto policies. The alleged systematic
underpayments result from third party valuation tool used by the
company as part of a comprehensive adjustment process is allegedly
flawed, biased, or contrary to applicable law, that the company
allegedly does not pay sales tax, title fees, registration fees,
and/or other specified fees that are allegedly mandatory under
policy language or state legal authority.

The Allstate Corporation is an insurance company, headquartered in
Glenview, Illinois.


ALLSTATE CORP: Faces Durgin Insurance Claims Suit
-------------------------------------------------
The Allstate Corporation disclosed in its Form 10-Q report for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 1, 2023, that the company is
defending a June 2019 putative class action captioned "Durgin v.
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company (W.D. La.).

It alleges that the company underpays total loss vehicle physical
damage claims on auto policies. The alleged systematic
underpayments result from third party valuation tool used by the
company as part of a comprehensive adjustment process is allegedly
flawed, biased, or contrary to applicable law, that the company
allegedly does not pay sales tax, title fees, registration fees,
and/or other specified fees that are allegedly mandatory under
policy language or state legal authority.

The Allstate Corporation is an insurance company, headquartered in
Glenview, Illinois.


ALLSTATE CORP: Faces Kronenberg Insurance Claims Suit
-----------------------------------------------------
The Allstate Corporation disclosed in its Form 10-Q report for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 1, 2023, that the company is
defending a December 2018 putative class action captioned
"Kronenberg v. Allstate Insurance Company and Allstate Fire and
Casualty Insurance Company" (E.D.N.Y.).

It alleges that the company underpays total loss vehicle physical
damage claims on auto policies. The alleged systematic
underpayments result from third party valuation tool used by the
company as part of a comprehensive adjustment process is allegedly
flawed, biased, or contrary to applicable law, that the company
allegedly does not pay sales tax, title fees, registration fees,
and/or other specified fees that are allegedly mandatory under
policy language or state legal authority.

The Allstate Corporation is an insurance company, headquartered in
Glenview, Illinois.


ALTITUDE GROUP: Starr-Harris Files TCPA Suit in S.D. Florida
------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against The Altitude Group,
LLC. The case is styled as Victoria Starr-Harris, individually and
on behalf of others similarly situated v. The Altitude Group, LLC
doing business as: Core Home Security, LLC, a Florida Limited
Liability Company doing business as: Core Home Security, LLC, Case
No. 0:23-cv-62155-RAR (S.D. Fla., Nov. 13, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.

Altitude Group, LLC was founded in 2008. The company's line of
business includes the practice of general or specialized medicine
and surgery for various licensed practitioners.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mohammad Reza Kazerouni, Esq.
          KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP APC
          245 Fischer Ave, D1
          Costa Mesa, CA 92626
          Phone: (949) 612-9999
          Fax: (800) 520-5523
          Email: mike@kazlg.com

               - and -

          Ryan L. McBride
          KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
          301 E. Bethany Home Road, Ste C-195
          Phoenix, AZ 85012
          Phone: (800) 400-6808
          Email: ryan@kazlg.com


API FINANCIAL: Schleicher Files Suit in E.D. Missouri
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against API Financial
Solutions, Inc. The case is styled as Doris Schleicher, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated v. API Financial
Solutions, Inc., Case No. 4:23-cv-01431-JSD (E.D. Mo., Nov. 9,
2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury.

API Financial Solutions -- https://www.apisolutions.com/ -- offers
payroll and human services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brandon J.B. Boulware, Esq.
          BOULWARE LAW LLC
          1600 Genessee Street, Suite 416
          Kansas City, MO 64102
          Phone: (816) 492-2826
          Fax: (816) 492-2826
          Email: brandon@boulware-law.com


ARAGON ADVERTISING: Must Produce Necessary Docs in Jackson Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as GERARD JACKSON on behalf
of himself and others similarly situated, v. ARAGON ADVERTISING,
LLC, Case No. 4:23-mc-00812-MWB (M.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge Matthew
W. Brann entered an order granting Petitioner Gerard Jackson's
motion to compel.

This is not the first dispute between these parties. On May 12,
2022, Jackson entered into a settlement agreement with Aragon
regarding allegations that Aragon had contacted him on behalf of
Clearlink in violation of the TCPA.

Aragon objects that the subpoena, which sought call data beginning
January 1, 2019, was improper as a result. In an attempt to resolve
the dispute without court intervention, Jackson agreed to limit his
request to calls made after May 12, 2022.10 Still, Aragon refused
to produce any documents.

Aragon is a creatives group specializing in digital marketing,
affiliate marketing, lead generation, and pay-per-call vertical.

A copy of the Court's memorandum opinion dated Nov. 9, 2023 is
available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/47wG0uU at no
extra charge.[CC]






ARDAGH GLASS: Castaneda Suit Removed to N.D. California
-------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Alex Castaneda, as a Private Attorney General
on behalf of the State of California v. ARDAGH GLASS INC. and Does
1 through 20, inclusive, Case No. 23CV041542 was removed from the
Superior Court of the State of California for the County of
Alameda, to the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California on Nov. 14, 2023, and assigned Case No.
3:23-cv-05850-LJC.

The Complaint and the California Labor Code Private Attorneys
General Act of 2004 ("PAGA") claim therein is based on the
following alleged violations of the California Labor Code: failure
to pay minimum wages for all hours worked under California Labor
Code; failure to pay overtime wages for all hours worked under
California Labor Code; failure to provide lawful meal periods or
compensation in lieu thereof under California Labor Code; failure
to authorize or permit lawful rest breaks or provide compensation
in lieu thereof under California Labor Code; failure to provide
accurate itemized wage statements under California Labor Code;
failure to maintain accurate and complete records showing the hours
worked under California Labor Code; and failure to reimburse all
business expenses under California Labor Code.[BN]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Sabrina L. Shadi, Esq.
          Nicholas D. Poper, Esq.
          Matthew J. Goodman, Esq.
          BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
          11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400
          Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509
          Phone: 310.820.8800
          Facsimile: 310.820.8859
          Email: sshadi@bakerlaw.com
                 npoper@bakerlaw.com
                 mgoodman@bakerlaw.com


ARGO GROUP: Files Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Dismissal Bid
------------------------------------------------------------------
Argo Group International Holdings Ltd. disclosed in its Form 10-Q
Report for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2023 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2023
that the defendants filed their reply to the opposition of lead
plaintiffs to their dismissal motion on the federal securities
class suit on August 14, 2023.
  
The Police & Fire Retirement System City of Detroit v. Argo Group
International Holdings, Ltd., et al., No. 22-cv-8971 (S.D.N.Y.)

On October 20, 2022, a securities class action lawsuit was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York against the Company and certain of its current and former
officers, alleging securities fraud violations under sections 10(b)
and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

On January 18, 2023, U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan granted
the Police and Fire Retirement System City of Detroit and the
Oklahoma Law Enforcement Retirement System's joint motion for
appointment as lead plaintiff.

On March 27, 2023, lead plaintiffs filed an Amended Class Action
Complaint, which alleges that from June 11, 2018 through August 9,
2022, defendants made false and misleading statements concerning
the Company's reserves and underwriting standards.

Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint on May 26, 2023.


Lead plaintiffs filed an opposition to said motion on July 13,
2023, after which Defendants filed a reply on August 14, 2023.

Argo Group is an underwriter of specialty insurance products in
the
property and casualty market.




ASPLUNDH CONSTRUCTION: Court Directs Filing of Discovery Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Vogel v. Asplundh
Construction, Case No. 1:23-cv-01385-JBM-JEH (C.D. Ill.), the Hon.
Judge Jonathan E. Hawley entered a standing order as follows:

   -- Rule 16 scheduling conference

      The Court will set a Rule 16 scheduling conference
approximately
      30 days after the answer or other responsive pleading is
filed.
      The conference will generally be conducted by telephone.

   -- Discovery plan

      The discovery plan shall be filed with the Court at least
three
      calendar days before the Rule 16 scheduling conference.

   -- Waiver of the Rule 16 scheduling conference

      If the parties agree on all matters contained in the
discovery
      plan, then the parties may waive the Rule 16 scheduling
      conference. To do so, the parties shall indicate in the
      discovery that the parties agree upon all maters contained
      within the discovery plan, and they request that the Rule 16

      scheduling conference be cancelled.

   -- Failure of counsel to attend a scheduled telephone hearing

      For the convenience of counsel, the Court conducts most
hearings
      by telephone when possible. Counsel's failure to appear for a

      telephone hearing will be treated as a failure of counsel to

      appear for an in-person hearing.

   -- Discovery disputes brought to the Court's attention after the

      discovery deadline has already passed

      The parties may not raise a discovery dispute with the Court

      after the relevant discovery deadline has passed; all
discovery
      disputes must be brought to the Court's attention before the

      relevant discovery deadline passes. Any discovery disputes
      raised with the Court after the expiration of the relevant
      discovery deadline shall be deemed waived by the Court, even
if
      the parties agreed to conduct discovery after the relevant
      discovery deadline has passed. If the parties agree to
conduct
      discovery after the expiration of a deadline set by the
Court,
      they must still file a motion requesting that the Court move

      that deadline as agreed by the parties in order to avoid any

      subsequent discovery disputes being deemed waived.

   -- Settlement conferences and mediation

      The parties are encouraged to seek a settlement conference or

      mediation with a magistrate judge. Where parties request a
      settlement conference or mediation in a case referred to
Judge
      Hawley, Judge Hawley will conduct said conference or
mediation.

Asplundh provides utility construction and maintenance services.

A copy of the Court's standing order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is
available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3SLayoD at no
extra charge.[CC]

ASTEC INDUSTRIES: TGERS Files Suit in S.D. Georgia
--------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Astec Industries,
Inc., et al. The case is styled as City of Taylor General Employees
Retirement System, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Astec Industries, Inc., Benjamin G. Brock,
David C. Silvious, Case No. 2:23-mc-00001-LGW-BWC (S.D. Ga., Nov.
10, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Motion to Compel.

Astec -- https://www.astecindustries.com/ -- is a manufacturer of
specialized equipment for asphalt road building, aggregate
processing and concrete production.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Enoch Paschal Hicks, Esq.
          JOHNSON FISTEL
          40 Powder Springs Street
          Marietta, GA 30064
          Phone: (470) 632-6000
          Email: enochh@johnsonfistel.com


AUTOMATIC DATA: Kiani Suit Removed to E.D. California
-----------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Amir Kiani a/k/a Amir Monshizadeh, a single
man; Chelsea Campbell, a single woman; and a class of all others
similarly situated v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc., Case No.
C20234421 was removed from the Superior Court of Arizona, Pima
County, to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of California on Nov. 8, 2023, and assigned Case No.
4:23-cv-00508-BGM.

This Plaintiffs allege that ADP violated the Fair Labor Standards
Act ("FLSA"), in their two Claims for Relief: Count I, Violation of
the FLSA's Overtime Compensation Provisions; and Count II,
Violation of the FLSA's Retaliation Provisions.[BN]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Joseph A. Kroeger, Esq.
          Joshua R. Woodard, Esq.
          Audrey E. Chastain, Esq.
          SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
          One South Church Avenue, Suite 1500
          Tucson, AZ 85701-1630
          Phone: 520.882.1200
          Facsimile: 520.884.1294
          Email: jkroeger@swlaw.com
                 jwoodard@swlaw.com
                 achastain@swlaw.com


BASCOM'S STEAKHOUSE: Seghrouchni Suit Removed to M.D. Florida
-------------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Ali Seghrouchni, on behalf of himself and
other similarly situated v. BASCOM'S STEAKHOUSE, INC., and FRED B.
BULLARD JR., individually, Case No. 23-008736-CI was removed from
the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas
County, Florida, to the United States District Court for the Middle
District of Florida on Nov. 9, 2023, and assigned Case No.
8:23-cv-02568.

The Plaintiff filed Complaint on behalf of himself and others
similarly situated against Defendants alleging that Defendants
violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended ("FLSA").[BN]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Luis A. Santos, Esq.
          Christopher C. Johnson, Esq.
          Melany Hernandez, Esq.
          FORDHARRISON LLP
          401 East Jackson Street, Suite 2500
          Tampa, FL 33602
          Phone: (813) 261-7800
          Facsimile: (813) 261-7899
          Email: cjohnson@fordharrison.com
                 lsantos@fordharrison.com
                 mhernandez@fordharrison.com


BGC GROUP: Continues to Defend Breach of Contract Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
BGC Group Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending September 30, 2023 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 9, 2023 that the Company continues
to defend itself from the breach of contract class suit in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Delaware.

On March 9, 2023, a purported class action complaint was filed
against Cantor, BGC Holdings, and Newmark Holdings in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Delaware (Civil Action No.
1:23-cv-00265).

The collective action, which was filed by seven former limited
partners of the defendants on their own behalf and on behalf of
other similarly situated limited partners, alleges a claim for
breach of contract against all defendants on the basis that the
defendants failed to make payments due under the relevant
partnership agreements.

Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that the non-compete and
economic forfeiture provisions upon which the defendants relied to
deny payment are unenforceable under Delaware law.

The plaintiffs allege a second claim against Cantor and BGC
Holdings for antitrust violations under the Sherman Act on the
basis that the Cantor and BGC Holdings partnership agreements
constitute unreasonable restraints of trade.

In that regard, the plaintiffs allege that the non-compete and
economic forfeiture provisions of the Cantor and BGC Holdings
partnership agreements, as well as restrictive covenants included
in partner separation agreements, cause anticompetitive effects in
the labor market, insulate Cantor and BGC Holdings from
competition, and limit innovation.

The plaintiffs seek a determination that the case may be maintained
as a class action, an injunction prohibiting the allegedly
anticompetitive conduct, and monetary damages of at least $5.0
million.

The Company believes the lawsuit has no merit. However, as with any
litigation, the outcome cannot be determined with certainty.

BGC Group, Inc., holding company for and successor to BGC
Partners,
Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary, and operates a global brokerage
and financial technology company servicing the global financial
markets through brands including BGC(R), Fenics(R), GFI(R),
Sunrise
Brokers(TM), Poten & Partners(R) and RP Martin(R), among others.
The company's businesses specialize in the brokerage of a broad
range of products, including fixed income such as government
bonds,
corporate bonds, and other debt instruments, as well as related
interest rate derivatives and credit derivatives. Additionally,
the
company provides brokerage products across FX, equities, energy
and
commodities, shipping, and futures and options.






BOJANGLES' RESTAURANTS: Appeals Class Cert. Ruling in Stafford Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
BOJANGLES' RESTAURANTS, INC. is taking an appeal from a court order
in the lawsuit entitled Robert Stafford, Jr., et al., individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.
Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc., et al., Defendants, Case No.
3:20-cv-00266-MOC-SCR, in the U.S. District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina.

The case is a collective action concerning wage and hour claims
raised by current and former Bojangles' shift managers. The
Plaintiffs allege violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
and state laws.

On Mar. 31, 2023, the Plaintiffs filed a motion to seek further
certification of seven additional classes bringing state law claims
in North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Alabama,
Georgia, and Virginia. On same day, the Defendant filed a motion to
decertify the Plaintiffs' FLSA class.

On Apr. 28, 2023, the Defendant opposed the Plaintiffs' motion to
certify additional classes.

On Oct. 20, 2023, the Court granted in part and denied in part the
Plaintiffs' motion to certify class through an Order entered by
Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. The Plaintiffs' motion was denied with
respect to the Alabama, Virginia, Georgia, Tennessee, and Kentucky
classes. The denial was without prejudice. The Plaintiffs' motion
was granted with respect to the North and South Carolina classes.

The appellate case is captioned Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc. v.
Robert Stafford, Jr., Case No. 23-282, in the United States Court
of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, filed on November 3, 2023. [BN]

Plaintiffs-Respondents ROBERT E. STAFFORD, JR., et al.,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, are
represented by:

            L. Michelle Gessner, Esq.
            GESSNERLAW, PLLC
            602 East Morehead Street
            Charlotte, NC 28202
            Telephone: (704) 234-7442

Defendant-Petitioner BOJANGLES' RESTAURANTS, INC. is represented
by:

            Brendan P. Biffany, Esq.
            Brian Lee Church, Esq.
            Charles Evans Johnson, Esq.
            ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA
            101 North Tryon Street
            Charlotte, NC 28246
            Telephone: (704) 377-2536
                       (704) 377-8354

BOTTS ABSTRACT: Spurrier Sues to Recover Unpaid Overtime
--------------------------------------------------------
Samanta Spurrier, individually and on behalf of similarly situated
individuals v. BOTTS ABSTRACT COMPANY dba BOTTS TITLE COMPANY, and
JAMES V. "VAL" WALTERS, Case No. 4:23-cv-04242 (S.D. Tex., Nov. 9,
2023), is brought against the Defendants to recover unpaid overtime
that is required by the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").

The Defendants' failure to pay the overtime premium required by law
allows them to gain an unfair advantage over competitors who follow
the law in their employment practices. Other title examiners that
work for Defendants are also paid a salary and are not paid for any
hours worked over 40. These individuals also regularly worked over
40 hours per week and were also not paid overtime pay for hours
they worked over 40 per workweek. In October of 2022, Mr. Walters
changed Ms. Spurrier's duties and relegated her to the position of
title examiner. Ms. Spurrier continued to work more than 40 hours
per week, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff was hired in June of 2013 as a title examiner.

Botts Abstract is a title company with offices around the state of
Texas.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Thomas H. Padgett, Jr., Esq.
          Josef F. Buenker, Esq.
          THE BUENKER LAW FIRM
          P.O. Box 10099
          Houston, TX 77206
          Phone: 713-868-3388
          Facsimile: 713-683-9940
          Email: tpadgett@buenkerlaw.com
                 jbuenker@buenkerlaw.com


BOYD GAMING: Court Directs Filing of Discovery Plan in Vallianatos
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Vallianatos v. Boyd Gaming
Corporation, Case No. 1:23-cv-01232-JBM-JEH (C.D. Ill.), the Hon.
Judge Jonathan E. Hawley entered a standing order as follows:

   -- Rule 16 scheduling conference

      The Court will set a Rule 16 scheduling conference
approximately
      30 days after the answer or other responsive pleading is
filed.
      The conference will generally be conducted by telephone.

   -- Discovery plan

      The discovery plan shall be filed with the Court at least
three
      calendar days before the Rule 16 scheduling conference.

   -- Waiver of the Rule 16 scheduling conference

      If the parties agree on all matters contained in the
discovery
      plan, then the parties may waive the Rule 16 scheduling
      conference. To do so, the parties shall indicate in the
      discovery that the parties agree upon all maters contained
      within the discovery plan, and they request that the Rule 16

      scheduling conference be cancelled.

   -- Failure of counsel to attend a scheduled telephone hearing

      For the convenience of counsel, the Court conducts most
hearings
      by telephone when possible. Counsel's failure to appear for a

      telephone hearing will be treated as a failure of counsel to

      appear for an in-person hearing.

   -- Discovery disputes brought to the Court's attention after the

      discovery deadline has already passed

      The parties may not raise a discovery dispute with the Court

      after the relevant discovery deadline has passed; all
discovery
      disputes must be brought to the Court's attention before the

      relevant discovery deadline passes. Any discovery disputes
      raised with the Court after the expiration of the relevant
      discovery deadline shall be deemed waived by the Court, even
if
      the parties agreed to conduct discovery after the relevant
      discovery deadline has passed. If the parties agree to
conduct
      discovery after the expiration of a deadline set by the
Court,
      they must still file a motion requesting that the Court move

      that deadline as agreed by the parties in order to avoid any

      subsequent discovery disputes being deemed waived.

   -- Settlement conferences and mediation

      The parties are encouraged to seek a settlement conference or

      mediation with a magistrate judge. Where parties request a
      settlement conference or mediation in a case referred to
Judge
      Hawley, Judge Hawley will conduct said conference or
mediation.

Boyd Gaming is an American gaming and hospitality company.

A copy of the Court's standing order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is
available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3G8ILHk at no
extra charge.[CC]

BREVILLE USA: Popkin Sues Over Wage and Hour Violations in Calif.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
STUART MICHAEL POPKIN, an individual and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. BREVILLE USA, INC., a California
corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants, Case
No. 23STCV27090 (Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., Nov. 3, 2023)
arises from the Defendants' alleged unlawful labor policies and
practices in violation of the California Labor Code and the
California Business and Professions Code.

The Plaintiff alleges the Defendants' failure to pay overtime
wages, failure to pay minimum wages, failure to provide rest
periods, waiting time penalties, wage statement violations, failure
to timely pay wages, failure to pay interest on deposits, failure
to indemnify, and unfair competition.

Plaintiff Popkin worked for the Defendants as a non-exempt employee
from approximately December of 2019 through November of 2022.

Breville USA, Inc. designs and delivers household appliances.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          David D. Bibiyan, Esq.
          Jeffrey Klein, Esq.
          Henry G. Glitz, Esq.
          BIBIYAN LAW GROUP, P.C.
          8484 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500
          Beverly Hills, CA 90211
          Telephone: (310) 438-5555
          Facsimile: (310) 300-1705
          E-mail: david@tomorrowlaw.com
                  jeff@tomorrowlaw.com
                  henry@tomorrowlaw.com

BRIGHAM YOUNG: Bid for Leave to File Renewed Class Cert Bid Tossed
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ROSCOE EVANS, an
individual on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
v. BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY, a Utah corporation, Case No.
1:20-cv-00100-TS-CMR (D. Utah), the Hon. Judge Ted Stewart entered
an order denying the Plaintiff's motion for leave to file renewed
motion for class certification.

  -- The parties are directed to submit a proposed scheduling order
to
     resolve his individual claims within 14 days of this Order.

  -- The Plaintiff argues that "courts routinely permit plaintiffs
to
     renew their motions for class certification with amended class

     definitions to cure problems identified by the district
court."

In response to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, colleges and
universities across the country transitioned from in-person to
online instruction beginning in March 2020.

The Plaintiff Roscoe Evans filed this putative class action against
Defendant Brigham Young University alleging breach of contract and
unjust enrichment on behalf of all people who paid tuition and/or
fees to BYU during the Winter 2020 semester.

The Scheduling Order entered in this case set May 7, 2021, as the
deadline for Plaintiff to move for class certification. That
deadline was later extended to August 2, 2021. On that date,
Plaintiff moved to certify the following class:

   "All persons who paid tuition and/or the Mandatory Fees to
attend
   in-person class(es) during the Winter 2020 term/semester
affected
   by COVID-19 at BYU and had their class(es) moved to online only

   learning."

BYU objected, arguing that the proposed definition was not
ascertainable. At the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion, the Court
alerted Plaintiff that it was "concerned about ascertainability and
whether or not this class is identifiable."

In response, counsel stated that ascertainability was not "much of
a problem." Ultimately, the Court disagreed with counsel's
assessment and denied Plaintiff's request for class certification.


The Plaintiff now seeks to "correct the deficiencies with his first
proposed definition." Because Plaintiff's Motion comes after the
deadline in the operative Scheduling Order, he must demonstrate
good cause.

Brigham is a private research university in Provo, Utah.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3G8J7xE at no extra charge.[CC]

BRINKER INTERNATIONAL: Loses Petition for En Banc Rehearing
------------------------------------------------------------
Brinker International, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q report for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2023, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2023, that on
September 15, 2023, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals denied
the company's August 15, 2023 petition for Panel or En Banc
Rehearing seeking further review by said court of the panel's July
11, 2023, decision vacating in part the district court's class
certification order. Rehearing was sought to address the panel'
upholding of the plaintiffs' damages methodology.

In 2018, the company discovered malware at certain Chili's
restaurants that may have resulted in unauthorized access or
acquisition of customer payment card data. The company settled all
claims from payment card companies related to this incident and do
not expect material claims from payment card companies in the
future.

The company was named as a defendant in a putative class action
lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Middle District
of Florida relating to this incident. In the Litigation, plaintiffs
assert various claims at the company's Chili's restaurants
involving customer payment card information and seek monetary
damages in excess of $5.0 million, injunctive and declaratory
relief, and attorney's fees and costs.

The company is exploring the option of petitioning the United
States Supreme Court for further review. All matters at the
district court remain stayed.

Brinker International, Inc. is engaged in the ownership, operation,
development, and franchising of the Chili's Grill & Bar  and
Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant brands, as well as virtual
brands including It's Just Wings and Maggiano's Italian Classics.


BTX TECHNOLOGIES: Castro Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against BTX Technologies,
Inc. The case is styled as Felix Castro, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated v. BTX Technologies, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-09922-JMF-JLC (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 9, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

BTX -- https://www.btx.com/ -- is well-known for providing the
highest quality fiber assemblies for the AV and broadcast
industries.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noor Abou-Saab, I, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF NOOR A. SAAB
          380 North Broadway, Suite 300
          Jericho, NY 11753
          Phone: (718) 740-5060
          Email: noorasaablaw@gmail.com


BUCKLE INC: Garcia CIPA Suit Removed to S.D. California
-------------------------------------------------------
The case styled SILVIA GARCIA, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. THE BUCKLE, INC., Case No.
37-02023-00044311-CU-MT-CTL, was removed from the Superior Court of
California, County of San Diego, to the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of California on November 16, 2023.

The Clerk of Court for the Southern District of California assigned
Case No. 3:23-cv-02104-BEN-KSC to the proceeding.

The Plaintiff brings the complaint for the Defendant's alleged
violation of the Children's Internet Protection Act.

The Buckle, Inc. is an American fashion retailer based in Nebraska.
[BN]

The Defendant is represented by:                                   
                                  
         
         Alyssa Sones, Esq.
         Jay T. Ramsey, Esq.
         Phillip Craig Cardon, Esq.
         SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
         1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 1600
         Los Angeles, CA 90067
         Telephone: (424) 288-5305
         Facsimile: (310) 228-3701
         E-mail: asones@sheppardmullin.com
                 jramsey@sheppardmullin.com
                 ccardon@sheppardmullin.com

BUNDOX RESTAURANT: Jayram Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against The Bundox Restaurant
Corp., et al. The case is styled as Savita Jayram, an individual,
on behalf of herself and on behalf of all persons similarly
situated v. The Bundox Restaurant Corp., Does 1 through 50,
Inclusive, Case No. CGC23610212 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco
Cty., Nov. 6, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Other Non-Exempt Complaints."

The Bundox Restaurant Corporation is a corporation located at Pier
9 The Embarcadero in San Francisco, California.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Nicholas James Blouw, Esq.
          BLUMENTHAL NORDREHAUG BHOWMIK DE BLOUW
          2255 Calle Clara
          La Jolla, CA 92037-3107
          Phone: 858-952-0354
          Fax: 858-551-1232
          Email: DeBlouw@bamlawca.com


BURGER MAN INC: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Bantsadze Alleges
------------------------------------------------------------
GVANTSA BANTSADZE, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. BURGER MAN INC.; and ALI ZAAROUR,
Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-10043 (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 15, 2023) is an
action against the Defendant for failure to pay minimum wages,
overtime compensation, provide meals and rest periods, and provide
accurate wage statements.

Plaintiff Bantsadze was employed by the Defendants as a food
preparer.

BURGER MAN INC. operates as a hamburger & hot dog restaurant. The
Company offers multiple other cuisines including Hot Dogs,
American, and Burgers. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Roman Avshalumov, Esq.
          HELEN F. DALTON & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          80-02 Kew Gardens Road, Suite 601
          Kew Gardens, NY 11415
          Telephone: (718) 263-9591

C.O. BIGELOW CHEMISTS: Melendez Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
---------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against C.O. Bigelow
Chemists, Inc. The case is styled as Rhondine Melendez, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated v. C.O. Bigelow
Chemists, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-08352-DG-TAM (E.D.N.Y., Nov. 9,
2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

C. O. Bigelow Apothecaries -- https://www.bigelowchemists.com/ --
is an American pharmacy and beauty brand currently owned and
operated by Ian Ginsberg.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


CAFE ISTANBUL: Taghizade Sues Over Servers' Unpaid Wages
--------------------------------------------------------
NIJAT TAGHIZADE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. CAFE ISTANBUL, INC. and EROL GIRGIN,
Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-00393 (E.D. Tex., Nov. 3, 2023) is an
action brought against the Defendants under the federal Fair Labor
Standards Act and the Portal-to-Portal Act for Plaintiff's unpaid
minimum wage, straight time compensation, and overtime pay.

The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of all current and
former non-exempt cook or server employees who worked for
Defendants at any location in the United States within the three
years prior to the filing of this complaint and were denied
compensation due to Defendant's policy and/or practice of failing
to pay applicable overtime or minimum wages or wrongfully
appropriating tips of such employees.

The Plaintiff was a server employee of Defendants hired from
November 2019 until the end of his employment in February 2021.

Cafe Istanbul, Inc. is a restaurant in Plano, Texas, that serves
Turkish and Middle-Eastern cuisine for customers dining in or
ordering online for pickup.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Katherine Serrano, Esq.
          FORESTER HAYNIE PLLC
          400 N. St. Paul Street, Ste. 700
          Dallas, TX 75201
          Telephone: (214) 210-2100
          E-mail: kserrano@foresterhaynie.com

COREBRIDGE FINANCIAL: Applegate Suit Transferred to D. Mass.
------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Dawn Ann Applegate, Richard Applegate, Jon
Robus, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
v. Corebridge Financial, Inc., American General Life Insurance Co.,
Case No. 4:23-cv-03227 was transferred from the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of Texas, to the U.S. District Court for
the District of Massachusetts on Nov. 3, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:23-cv-12657-ADB to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract for Breach of
Contract.

Corebridge Financial -- https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/ -- is
an American multinational financial services company.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Gregory Haroutunian, Esq.
          Michael Anderson Berry, Esq.
          ARNOLD LAW FIRM
          865 Howe Ave.
          Sacramento, CA 95825
          Phone: (916) 777-7777
          Email: gharoutunian@justice4you.com
                 lori@justice4you.com

               - and -

          Timothy W. Emery, Esq.
          EMERY REDDY, PLLC
          600 Stewart St., Suite 1100
          Seattle, WA 98101
          Phone: (206) 442-9106
          Email: emeryt@emeryreddy.com

               - and -

          Joe Kendall, Esq.
          KENDALL LAW GROUP, PLLC
          3811 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1450
          Dallas, TX 75219
          Phone: (214) 744-3000
          Fax: (214) 744-3015
          Email: jkendall@kendalllawgroup.com


COSTCO WHOLESALE: Reyes Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Costco Wholesale, et
al. The case is styled as Martin Reyes, on behalf of himself and on
behalf of all persons similarly situated v. Costco Wholesale, et
al., Case No. 23CV011351 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., Nov. 8,
2023).

Costco Wholesale -- https://www.costco.com/ -- is a multibillion
dollar global retailer with warehouse club operations in 11
countries.[BN]

CRANE STATIONARY: Stroude Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Crane Stationary,
LLC. The case is styled as Colette Stroude, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated v. Crane Stationary, LLC, Case
No. 1:23-cv-08339 (E.D.N.Y., Nov. 9, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Crane Stationary -- https://www.crane.com/ -- offers personalized
cards, invitations, and more quality stationery.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


DAKOTA EYE INSTITUTE: Cleveland Files Suit in D. North Dakota
-------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Dakota Eye Institute,
LLP, et al. The case is styled as Christine Cleveland, on behalf of
herself individually and all others similarly situated v. Dakota
Eye Institute, LLP, Dakota Eye Institute, P.C., Case No.
1:23-cv-00215-DMT-CRH (D.N.D., Nov. 7, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Dakota Eye Institute -- https://www.dakotaeye.com/ -- is the
region's premier LASIK, cataract surgery, and eye care
provider.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Josh Sanford, Esq.
          SANFORD LAW FIRM
          10800 Financial Centre Pkwy, Suite 510
          Little Rock, AR 72211
          Phone: (501) 221-0088
          Fax: (888) 787-2040
          Email: josh@sanfordlawfirm.com

               - and -

          Bryan L. Bleichner, Esq.
          CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA
          100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1700
          Minneapolis, MN 55401
          Phone: (612) 339-7300
          Fax: (612) 336-2940
          Email: bbleichner@chestnutcambronne.com


DELAWARE LIFE: McGarry Sues Over Failure to Safeguard PII
---------------------------------------------------------
Ruth McGarry, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated v. DELAWARE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and PROGRESS SOFTWARE
CORPORATION, Case No. 1:23-cv-12714-ADB (D. Mass., Nov. 9, 2023),
is brought against Defendants for their failure to properly secure
and safeguard Plaintiff’s and other similarly situated Delaware
Life customers’ sensitive information, including their full
names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, policy or contract
numbers, and other sensitive information ("personally identifiable
information" or “PII”).

Former and current Delaware Life customers are required to entrust
Defendants with sensitive, non-public PII, without which Defendants
could not perform their regular business activities, in order to
obtain annuity products and/or other services from Delaware Life.
Defendants retain this information for at least many years and even
after the consumer relationship has ended. By obtaining,
collecting, using, and deriving a benefit from the PII of Plaintiff
and Class Members, Defendants assumed legal and equitable duties to
those individuals to protect and safeguard that information from
unauthorized access and intrusion.

On May 31, 2023, Delaware Life learned that Pension Benefit
Information, LLC’s network, which PSC provided software services
to and Delaware Life relied on for the sending and receiving of
sensitive information, had been penetrated by a cyberattack In
response, Pension Benefit Information, LLC (“PBI”) “promptly
launched an investigation into" the nature and scope of the MOVEit
vulnerability’s impact on Delaware Life’s systems." As a result
of the investigation, PBI concluded--on undisclosed date--that "the
third party accessed one of Delaware Life’s MOVEit Transfer
servers on May 29, 2023 and May 30, 2023 and downloaded data."
According to the untitled letter sent by PBI, on behalf of
Defendants, to Plaintiff and other victims of the Data Breach (the
“Notice Letter”), the compromised PII included individuals’
full names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and policy or
numbers.

The Defendants failed to adequately protect Plaintiff’s and Class
Members PII––and failed to even encrypt or redact this highly
sensitive information. This unencrypted, unredacted PII was
compromised due to Defendants’ negligent and/or careless acts and
omissions and their utter failure to protect consumers’ sensitive
data. Hackers targeted and obtained Plaintiff’s and Class
Members’ PII because of its value in exploiting and stealing the
identities of Plaintiff and Class Members. The present and
continuing risk to victims of the Data Breach will remain for their
respective lifetimes, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff and Class Members are current and former Delaware
Life customers.

Delaware Life is a financial company that provides annuity products
and other retirement services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Randi Kassan, Esq.
          MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC
          100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500
          Garden City, NY 11530
          Phone: (212) 594-5300
          Email: rkassan@milberg.com


DJGN LLC: Class Settlement in Benjamin Gets Final Nod
-----------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ESTATE OF GARETH BENJAMIN,
JOHN HARLEY, CHRISTOPHER SULLIVAN, AND AUSTIN BRADY, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, v. DJGN LLC, DJGN
LEXINGTON, LLC, and DJGN INDY, LLC d/b/a TONY'S STEAKS & SEAFOOD,
Case No. 1:22-cv-00166-TSB (S.D. Ohio), the Hon. Judge Timothy S.
Black entered an order granting the plaintiffs' unopposed motion
for final approval of Rule 23 Settlement, for payment of attorneys'
Fees, costs, and expenses, and for entry of final judgment.

The Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for final approval of Rule 23
class action settlement, for payment of attorneys' fees, costs, and
expenses, and for entry of judgment is granted. Accordingly:

    1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and (b)(3), for settlement

       purposes, the Court certifies the following Settlement
Classes:

       The Rule 23 Ohio Class

       "All current and former Servers of Defendant DJGN LLC at its

       Cincinnati, Ohio restaurant who worked as a Server at any
time
       from March 30, 2019 through July 1, 2022."

       The Rule 23 Kentucky Class

       "All current and former Servers of Defendant DJGN Lexington,

       LLC at its Lexington, Kentucky restaurant who worked as a
       Server at any time from March 3, 2017 to July 1, 2022."

       The Rule 23 Indiana Class

       "All current and former Servers of Defendant DJGN Indy, LLC

       at its Indianapolis, Indiana restaurant who worked as a
Server
       at any time from April 4, 2020 to July 1, 2022."

    2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(3), all such persons who
       satisfy the Settlement Classes definitions above are members
of
       the Settlement Class. Because no member of the Settlement
       Classes opted out of the Settlement, all Settlement Class
       Members are bound by this Final Approval Order.

    3. The Court grants final approval to its appointment of the
       Estate of Benjamin Gareth as Class Representative for the
Rule
       23 Ohio Class; Christopher Sullivan as Class Representative
for
       the Rule 23 Kentucky Class; and Austin Brady as Class
       Representative for the Rule 23 Indiana Class. The Court
finds
       that each Class Representative is similarly situated to
absent
       Class Members, is typical of the Class, and is an adequate
       Class Representative, and that Class Counsel and the Class
       Representative have fairly and adequately represented the
       Class.

    4. The Court grants final approval to its appointment of Class

       Counsel, appointing David W. Garrison and Joshua A. Frank of

       Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison, PLLC. Class Counsel have

       extensive experience handling class action cases and have
       thoroughly represented the Class Members’ interests in
this
       case.

    5. The Court's Preliminary Approval Order approved the notice
       procedures to the Rule 23 Classes and found the distribution

       and publishing of the various notices as proposed met the
       requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 and due process, and was
the
       best notice practicable under the circumstances,
constituting
       due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to notice.

       The Court finds that the distribution of the Notices has
been
       achieved pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order and the

       Settlement Agreement, and that the Notice to Class Members
       complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, due process, and any other

       applicable law.

    6. The Court approves the distribution and allocation of the
       settlement fund pursuant to the Settlement Agreement.

    7. The Court awards Class Counsel $500,000 in attorneys' fees,

       which is 1/3 of the $1,500,000 settlement fund, and
       reimbursement of expenses of $25,142.42 to be paid according
to
       the terms of the Settlement Agreement. These amounts of fees

       and expenses are fair and reasonable.

    8. The Court awards the Class Representatives, the Estate of
       Gareth Benjamin, Christopher Sullivan, and Austin Brady,
       $15,000 each to be paid according to the terms of the
       Settlement Agreement. The award is justified based on their

       service to the Classes.

The case is a collective and class action against Defendants DJGN
LLC, DJGN Lexington, LLC, and DJGN Indy, LLC.

Specifically, in the operative Second Amended Complaint, the
Plaintiffs allege that Defendants required servers at their Ohio,
Kentucky, and Indiana restaurants, who are tipped employees, to
participate in a tip pooling arrangement with management and
supervisory employees, in violation of both the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. sections 201 et seq., and state
wage laws.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/49MCq1Z at no extra charge.[CC]


 


DOWN TO EARTH: Alcantara Sues Over Nonpayment of Overtime Wages
---------------------------------------------------------------
Juan Fernando Mop-Ales Alcantara, on behalf of himself and others
similarly situated v. DOWN TO EARTH LANDSCAPNG, INC. and RYAN
DANIELS, Case No. 1:23-cv-15840 (N.D. Ill., Nov. 9, 2023), is
brought to remedy nonpayment of overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), to remedy violations of the
Illinois Minimum Wage Law ("IMWL"), and Illinois Wage Payment and
Collection Act ("IWPCA").

In violation of the FLSA, Defendants failed to pay Plaintiff and
other similarly situated workers overtime compensation at the rate
of one and one-half times their regular rates of pay for all hours
worked in excess of forty in a workweek. The Defendants also
violated the IMWL by failing to pay Plaintiff and similarly
situated workers at the prescribed rate of one and one-half times
their regular wage rates for all overtime hours worked. Further,
Defendants violated the IWPCA by failing to pay all wages when due.
As a remedy for Defendants' acts, Plaintiff seeks relief on behalf
of himself and similarly situated workers, including unpaid
overtime wages, liquidated damages under the FLSA, state law
penalties, pre and post-judgment interest, and attorney's fees and
costs, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff worked for the Defendants.

Down to Earth offers various landscape maintenance, landscape
construction, and snow removal services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jorge Sanchez, Esq.
          Baldemar Lopez, Esq.
          LOPEZ & SANCHEZ LLP
          77 W. Washington St., Suite 1313
          Chicago, IL 60602d
          Phone: (312) 420-6784



DRUG FREE WORKPLACES: Cohen Files Suit in N.D. Florida
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Drug Free Workplaces
USA LLC. The case is styled as Alexander Cohen, on behalf of
himself individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
v. Drug Free Workplaces USA LLC, Case No. 3:23-cv-24684-MCR-HTC
(N.D. Fla., Nov. 8, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract.

Drug Free Workplaces -- https://drugfreeworkplaces.com/ -- provides
policy development, program management, testing oversight, and
education/training for our clients.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jeffrey Miles Ostrow, Esq.
          KOPELOWITZ OSTROW ET AL - FORT LAUDERDALE FL
          1 W. Las Olas Blvd., 5th floor
          Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
          Phone: (954) 525-4100
          Fax: (954) 525-4300
          Email: ostrow@kolawyers.com


EAGLERIDER INC: Freedman Sues Over Undisclosed Fees on EagleShare
-----------------------------------------------------------------
BRIAN FREEDMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. EAGLERIDER, INC., Defendant, Case No.
CACE-23-021089 (Fla. Cir., 17th Judicial, Broward Cty., November
13, 2023) alleges claims against the Defendant for breach of
contract, unjust enrichment, and for violations of the Florida
Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

The class action arises from the Defendant's failure to disclose
the additional fee being charged when EagleShare platform users
transfer their earnings to their external bank accounts. As a
result of failing to disclose this additional fee, the amount of
money received by Plaintiff was less than promised and advertised,
the suit says.

Headquartered in Hawthorne, CA, EagleRider Inc. operates the
EagleShare peer-to-peer platform motorcycle sharing platform. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

        William Wright, Esq.
        THE WRIGHT LAW OFFICE, P.A.
        515 N. Flagler Dr Ste P300
        West Palm Beach, FL 33401
        Telephone: (561) 514-0904
        E-mail: willwrightlawoffice.com

                - and -

        Spencer Sheehan, Esq.
        SHEEHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
        60 Cuttermill Rd Ste 412
        Great Neck, NY 11021
        Telephone: (516) 268-7080
        E-mail: spencer@spencersheehan.com

ED LEVIN JEWELRY: Robertson Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ed Levin Jewelry,
Inc. The case is styled as Jasmine Robertson, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated v. Ed Levin Jewelry, Inc., Case
No. 1:23-cv-09924 (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 9, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Ed Levin Jewelry, Inc. -- https://www.eldesigns.com/ -- is
considered the oldest and largest hand-crafted jewelry manufacturer
in the United States.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noor Abou-Saab, I, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF NOOR A. SAAB
          380 North Broadway, Suite 300
          Jericho, NY 11753
          Phone: (718) 740-5060
          Email: noorasaablaw@gmail.com


EIGHTH STREET: Giraldo Files ADA Suit in D. New Jersey
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Eighth Street Music,
Inc. The case is styled as Laura Giraldo, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated v. Eighth Street Music, Inc., Case
No. 1:23-cv-22115-RMB-AMD (D.N.J., Nov. 8, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Eighth Street Music -- https://8thstreet.com/ -- sells musical
instruments.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          David S. Glanzberg, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GLANZBERG
          123 S. Broad Street, Suite 1640
          Philadelphia, PA 19109
          Phone: (215) 981-5400
          Fax: (267) 319-1993
          Email: david.glanzberg@gtlawpc.com


ELI LILLY: Faces Suit Over Price Manipulation of Analog Insulins
----------------------------------------------------------------
INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY; NOVO NORDISK INC.; and
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, Defendants, Case No. 2:23-cv-22305-BRM-RLS
(D.N.J., November 13, 2023) arises from the Defendants' artificial,
deceptive, and unfair manipulation of the list prices for analog
insulin in the United States.

The Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated various state
consumer protection laws by engaging in a deceptive and unfair
pricing scheme with respect to the Analog Insulins (Humalog,
Basaglar, Fiasp, Novolog, Levemir, Tresiba, Apidra, Lantus, and
Toujeo). This scheme directly and foreseeably caused, and continues
to cause, health plans and third-party payors to overpay for the
Analog Insulins their insured members need, the suit says.

The Defendants have engaged in "shadow pricing," a tactic where
they tacitly agree to follow each other's list price increases in
near unison. Then, with identical list prices, the Defendants need
only 'compete' by exploiting idiosyncrasies in the pharmacy benefit
managers' incentive structures. Instead of lowering their net
prices while keeping their list prices constant, the Defendants all
raised their list prices in lockstep while keeping their net prices
constant, added the suit.

Headquartered in Indianapolis, IN, Eli Lilly manufactures Humalog
and Basaglar, which are used for the treatment of diabetes. Eli
Lilly's revenues from Humalog were $2.06 billion in 2022 and $2.45
billion in 2021. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          James E. Cecchi, Esq.
          Donald A. Ecklund, Esq.
          CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI,
          BRODY &AGNELLO, P.C.
          5 Becker Farm Road
          Roseland, NJ 07068
          Telephone: (973) 422-5591
          E-mail: jcecchi@carellabyrne.com
                  decklund@carellabyrne.com

                  - and -

          Joseph P. Guglielmo, Esq.
          Donald A. Broggi, Esq.
          SCOTT+SCOTT ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP
          230 Park Avenue, 17th Floor
          New York, NY 10169
          Telephone (212) 223-4478
          E-mail: jguglielmo@scott-scott.com
                  dbroggi@scott-scott.com

                  - and -

          Steve W. Berman, Esq.
          HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
          1301 2nd Avenue, Suite 2000
          Seattle, WA 98101
          Telephone: (206) 623-7292
          E-mail: steve@hbsslaw.com

                  - and -

          Thomas M. Sobol, Esq.
          Hannah W. Brennan, Esq.
          HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
          1 Faneuil Hall Sq. 5th Floor Boston, MA 02109
          Telephone: (617) 482-3700
          E-mail: tom@hbsslaw.com
                  hannahb@hbsslaw.com

                  - and -

          Mark T. Vazquez, Esq.
          HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
          455 North Cityfront Plaza Drive
          Suite 2410
          Chicago, IL 60611
          Telephone: (708) 628-4949
          E-mail: markv@hbsslaw.com

                  - and -

          Lyndsey K. Bates, Esq.
          ASHER KELLY ATTORNEYS AT LAW
          25800 Northwestern Highway, Suite 1100
          Southfield, MI 48075
          Telephone: (248) 746-2753
          E-mail: lbates@asherkellylaw.com

ENHANCING YOUR HABITAT: Robertson Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Enhancing Your
Habitat, LLC. The case is styled as Jasmine Robertson, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated v. Enhancing Your
Habitat, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-09927-JLR (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 9, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Enhancing Your Habitat, LLC --
https://www.enhancingyourhabitat.com/ -- offers e-commerce home
furnishings, decor, and interior design.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noor Abou-Saab, I, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF NOOR A. SAAB
          380 North Broadway, Suite 300
          Jericho, NY 11753
          Phone: (718) 740-5060
          Email: noorasaablaw@gmail.com


ENVISION HEALTHCARE: Court Lifts Stay & Reopens Bettis Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Bettis v. Envision
Healthcare Corporation et al. (Envision Healthcare Corporation
Securities Litigation), Case No. 3:17-cv-01112 (M.D. Tenn.), the
Hon. Judge William L. Campbell, Jr. entered an order lifting stay
and reopening case:

The Parties jointly move to lift the current stay and reopen the
case as to the Individual Defendants so the Court may consider, and
grant, Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for:

     (i) Preliminary Approval of Settlement;

    (ii) Class Certification for Settlement Purposes; and

   (iii) Approval of Notice of the Class.

Envision provides healthcare services, including physician-led
services, ambulatory surgery center management, post-acute care and
medical.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3SPgI7k at no extra charge.[CC]

EVERETT FINANCIAL: Keller Files TCPA Suit in D. South Carolina
--------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Everett Financial,
Inc.  The case is styled as Michele Keller, individually and on
behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated v.
Everett Financial, Inc. doing business as: Supreme Lending, Case
No. 6:23-cv-05732-TMC (D.S.C., Nov. 9, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.

Everett Financial, Inc. doing business as Supreme Lending --
https://www.supremelending.com/ -- is a full-service mortgage
lender with a mission to create the best home financing experience
possible.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dave Maxfield, Esq.
          DAVE MAXFIELD, ATTORNEY, LLC
          PO Box 11865
          Columbia, SC 29211
          Phone: (803) 509-6800
          Fax: (855) 299-1656
          Email: dave@consumerlawsc.com


F.C. INDUSTRIES: Bid for Class Certification Due July 12, 2024
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as REGINALD SANDERS,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
F.C. INDUSTRIES, INC., Case No. 3:23-cv-00055-MJN-PBS (S.D. Ohio),
the Hon. Judge Michael J. Newman entered an order adopting the new
case management dates and deadlines in this case are as follows:

  1. Discovery deadline on Plaintiffs' motion      Dec. 15, 2023
     for Court-approved written notice to any
     putative collective members:

  2. Plaintiffs' motion for court-approved         Feb. 2, 2024
     written notice to any putative collective
     members:

  3. Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs'         Feb. 23, 2024
     motion for court-approved written
     notice to any putative collective
     members:

  4. Any reply in support of Plaintiffs'           Mar. 8, 2024
     motion for court-approved written
     notice to any putative collective
     members:

  5. Discovery cutoff for Plaintiffs' motion       June 14, 2024
     for class certification:

  6. Plaintiffs' motion for class certification:   July 12, 2024

  7. Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs'         Aug. 2, 2024
     motion for class certification:

  8. Any reply in support of Plaintiffs'           Aug. 16, 2024
     motion for class certification:

FC Industries operates as a metal manufacturing company.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/47fXThY at no extra charge.[CC]

FLAVOR PAPER: Melendez Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Flavor Paper LTD. The
case is styled as Rhondine Melendez, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated v. Flavor Paper LTD., Case No.
1:23-cv-08354 (E.D.N.Y., Nov. 9, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

FLAVOR PAPER -- https://www.flavorpaper.com/ -- is known for
creating compelling conversational wallpaper that flips tradition
on its head.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


FORD MOTOR: Shiff Sues Over Sale of Vehicles With Defective Camera
------------------------------------------------------------------
GABRIEL SHIFF, et al., individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant,
Case No. 2:23-cv-22429-JXN-JRA (D.N.J., November 16, 2023) is a
class action against the Defendant for violations of the New Jersey
Consumer Fraud Act and the New Jersey Uniform Declaratory Judgments
Act and for breach of contract, breach of implied contract, breach
of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability
and fitness for a particular purpose, unjust
enrichment/disgorgement, and breach of implied warranty of
merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.

According to the complaint, Ford designed, manufactured, marketed,
advertised, and sold or leased a 2020-2023 Ford Explorer, a
2020-2023 Lincoln Aviator, and/or a 2020-2022 Lincoln Corsair to
the Plaintiffs and the Class with a defective 360-Degree Camera
system.

Ford Motor Company is an automobile company based in Dearborn,
Michigan. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                
      
         Stephen Patrick Denittis, Esq.
         DENITTIS OSEFCHEN PRINCE, PC
         525 Route 73 N., Suite 410
         Marlton, NJ 08053
         Telephone: (856) 797-9951
         Facsimile: (856) 797-9978
         E-mail: sdenittis@denittislaw.com

G2 SECURE: Diaz Sues Over Wage and Hour Law Violations
------------------------------------------------------
NELSON DIAZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. G2 SECURE STAFF, L.L.C., Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-08422 (E.D.N.Y., November 13, 2023) seeks all available
relief, including liquidated damages and unpaid wages, under the
New York Labor Law, Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Wage Theft
Prevention Act.

Plaintiff Diaz worked for G2 as a cleaner and guide from
approximately May 2022 to August 13, 2022. Throughout his
employment at G2 as a cleaner and guide, Diaz spent over 25% of
each workday performing duties that were physical in nature, which
required standing, bending, lifting, and walking. However, G2 paid
Diaz's wages on a biweekly basis. In addition, G2 also did not pay
Diaz any wages for his hours worked on his last two workweeks of
employment, from approximately July 29 to August 11, 2022, even
though he worked his regular work schedule on these workweeks, says
the Plaintiff.

Based in Irving, TX, G2 provides over 11,000 aviation service
professionals to over eighty-eight airports across the United
States. It works with various airports, including LaGuardia
Airport, providing services such as full ground handling; aircraft
appearance; passenger and ramp services; terminal services; cargo;
security; and maintenance services. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Louis Pechman, Esq.
         Gianfranco J. Cuadra, Esq.
         PECHMAN LAW GROUP PLLC
         488 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor
         New York, NY 10022
         Telephone: (212) 583-9500
         E-mail: pechman@pechmanlaw.com
                 cuadra@pechmanlaw.com

GEISINGER SYSTEM: Class Certification Bid Extended to June 14, 2024
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit re Geisinger System Services and
Evangelical Community Hospital Healthcare Workers Antitrust
Litigation, Case No. 4:21-cv-00196-MWB (M.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge
Matthew W. Brann entered an order granting Joint Motion for
Extension of All Remaining Deadlines under Current Case Management
Order.

The current deadlines are extended as follows

        Event                           Current           New
                                        Deadline          Deadline


  Deadline for Plaintiffs to Respond        N/A        Nov. 22,
2023
  to All Outstanding Discovery
  Requests as Directed at the
  November 1 Status Conference

  Deadline for Deposition of                N/A        Dec. 13,
2023
  Plaintiffs

  Close of fact discovery             Oct. 31, 20232   Dec. 13,
2023

  Expert reports on all issues        Nov. 28, 2023    Jan. 16,
2024
  relating to class certification
  and merits

  Expert witness depositions          Apr. 12, 2024    May 30, 2024


  Class certification/Daubert         Apr. 26, 2024    June 14,
2024
  motions and supporting briefs

  Oppositions to class                June 18, 2024    Aug. 6, 2024

  certification/Daubert motions

  Replies in support of class         July 12, 2024    Aug. 30,
2024
  certification/Daubert motions

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/47kCFQ9 at no extra charge.[CC]

GLOBAL ATLANTIC: Bernstein Suit Removed to S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Michael Bernstein, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. The Global Atlantic Financial Group
LLC, Case No. 159108/2023 was removed from the Supreme Court of the
State of New York, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York on Nov. 8, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:23-cv-09868-LGS to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud.

Global Atlantic Financial Group Limited --
https://www.globalatlantic.com/ -- through its subsidiaries, offers
a broad range of retirement, life and re-insurance products.[BN]

The Defendant is represented by:

          Robyn Mara Feldstein, Esq.
          BAKER HOSTETLER
          45 Rockefeller Plaza
          New York, NY 10111
          Phone: (212) 589-4278
          Email: rfeldstein@bakerlaw.com


GULLY TRANSPORTATION: Seals Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Compensation
------------------------------------------------------------------
Shawn Seals, on behalf of himself individually and all other
similarly situated employees v. GULLY TRANSPORTATION, INC., Case
No. 4:23-cv-00824-RK (W.D. Mo., Nov. 8, 2023), is brought under the
Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA), meaning that Seals was not eligible to
receive overtime compensation under Defendant's uniform
compensation plan.

The Defendant improperly classified Seals and other Yard Hostlers
as exempt employees, and Defendant improperly withheld overtime
compensation from Seals and all other Yard Hostlers. Seals brings
this case on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated
Yard Hostlers employed by Defendant and seeks unpaid overtime
compensation, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff was presently employed by the Defendant as a Yard
Hostler and has since 2020.

Gully Transportation provides transportation services, such as
over-the-road trucking, intermodal service, drayage service,
logistics and warehousing around the Country.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          John J. Ziegelmeyer III, Esq.
          Brad K. Thoenen, Esq.
          Kevin A. Todd, Esq.
          Ethan A. Crockett, Esq.
          HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP
          1501 Westport Road
          Kansas City, Missouri 64111
          Phone: 816.875.9339
          Email: jziegelmeyer@hkm.com
                 bthoenen@hkm.com
                 ktodd@hkm.com
                 ecrockett@hkm.com

               - and -

          Michael Hodgson, Esq.
          THE HODGSON LAW FIRM, LLC
          3609 SW Pryor Road
          Lee's Summit, MO 64082
          Phone: 816.600-0117
          Fax: 816.600-0137
          Email: mike@thehodgsonlawfirm.com


HARBORSTONE CREDIT: Class Settlement in Garcia Gets Final Nod
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARIO PAREDES GARCIA, v.
HARBORSTONE CREDIT UNION, Case No. 3:21-cv-05148-LK (W.D. Wash.),
the Hon. Judge Lauren King entered an order granting the
plaintiff's motion for final approval of class action settlement
and Attorneys' fees and costs.

  -- Harborstone must pay $186,750 to establish the settlement fund
in
     accordance with the Amended Settlement Agreement.

  -- Harborstone must pay attorneys' fees and costs to class
counsel
     in the amount of $150,000.

  -- Harborstone must pay Simpluris settlement administrator costs
of
     no more than $25,000.

  -- Harborstone must pay an incentive award to Mr. Paredes Garcia
in
     the amount of $5,000.

Mr. Paredes Garcia is a noncitizen resident of Gig Harbor who was
granted protected status under the Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals (DACA) program.

Harborstone is a Washington-based credit union with a majority of
its branches located in Pierce County. On April 22, 2020, after
previously being granted an auto loan from Harborstone, Mr. Paredes
Garcia submitted a second auto loan application that Harborstone
denied because his DACA documentation was "not acceptable for
financing."

The class is defined as:

   "All individuals who resided in the United States at the time
they
   applied for a loan from Harborstone Credit Union, and for whom
   Harborstone obtained a credit report, and whose applications
were
   declined at any time between January 26, 2018, and August 31,
2021
   for the reason that they had a tax identification number because

   they were not permanent residents of the United States."

Harborstone is a member-owned, not-for-profit organization offering
members more than financial services.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 9, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3MMkmLu at no extra charge.[CC]

HEALTHFLEX HOME: Faces Salangsang Suit Over Non Exempt Complaints
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ADELAIDA N. SALANGSANG, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. HEALTHFLEX HOME HEALTH SERVICES,
et al., Defendants, Case No. CGC23610482 (Cal. Super., San
Francisco Cty., November 16, 2023) is a class action against the
Defendants for other non-exempt complaints.

HealthFlex Home Health Services is a healthcare services provider
in California.

HealthFlex Hospice is a hospice care services provider in
California. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Alvin B. Lindsay, Esq.
         YEREMIAN LAW
         535 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 705
         Glendale, CA 91203
         Telephone: (818) 230-8380

HILB GROUP: Crowley Sues Over Personal Injury Claims in E.D. Va.
----------------------------------------------------------------
GABRIELLE CROWLEY, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. THE HILB GROUP OPERATING COMPANY,
LLC, Defendant, Case No. 3:23-cv-00778-HEH (E.D. Va., November 16,
2023) is a class action against the Defendant for personal injury
claims.

The nature of the suit is stated as 360 Torts - Personal Injury -
Other Personal Injury.

The Hilb Group Operating Company, LLC is an insurance and risk
management services provider in Virginia. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Sarah Gallo Sauble, Esq.
         Lee Adair Floyd, Esq.
         BREIT BINIAZAN
         2100 East Cary Street, Suite 310
         Richmond, VA 23223
         Telephone: (804) 522-0065
         Facsimile: (757) 670-3939
                    (703) 517-3514
         E-mail: sarah@bbtrial.com
                 lee@bbtrial.com

IFIT INC: Douglass Suit Seeks to Certify Settlement Class
---------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as BLAIR DOUGLASS, on behalf
of himself and all others similarly situated, v. iFIT INC., Case
No. 2:23-cv-00917-MJH (W.D. Pa.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to
enter an order:

   -- Certifying the class for settlement purposes;

   -- Appointing Plaintiff as class representative; and

   -- Appointing Plaintiff's counsel as class counsel.

1. In July 2020, the Plaintiff attempted to access Defendant's
online store, located at https://www.nordictrack.com/.

The Plaintiff could not access Defendant's online store because it
was not compatible with screen reader auxiliary aids, which
Plaintiff uses to access digital content because he is blind.

In June 2022, Plaintiff returned to https://www.nordictrack.com/
and also visited Defendant's other online stores located at
https://www.proform.com/, https://freemotionfitness.com/, and
https://www.ifit.com/, and found that they continued to deny him
full and equal access.

In May 2023, Plaintiff filed a class action complaint seeking
declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that Defendant does not
have, and has never had, adequate policies and practices to cause
its online store to be accessible to blind persons, in violation of
Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and its
implementing regulations.

In October 2023, the Plaintiff notified the Court that the parties
had agreed to settle this case on a class action basis.

IFIT develops, manufactures, and markets fitness equipment.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Nov. 10, 2023 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/46hjrJS at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Kevin W. Tucker, Esq.
          Kevin J. Abramowicz, Esq.
          Chandler Steiger, Esq.
          Stephanie Moore, Esq.
          EAST END TRIAL GROUP LLC
          6901 Lynn Way, Suite 215
          Pittsburgh, PA 15208
          Telephone: (412) 877-5220
          E-mail: ktucker@eastendtrialgroup.com
                  kabramowicz@eastendtrialgroup.com
                  csteiger@eastendtrialgroup.com
                  smoore@eastendtrialgroup.com

IMPERIAL FIRE: Faces Bass Insurance Claims Suit
-----------------------------------------------
The Allstate Corporation disclosed in its Form 10-Q report for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 1, 2023, that its affiliate is
defending a February 2022 2019 putative class action captioned
"Bass v. Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company (W.D. La.).

It alleges that the company underpays total loss vehicle physical
damage claims on auto policies. The alleged systematic
underpayments result from third party valuation tool used by the
company as part of a comprehensive adjustment process is allegedly
flawed, biased, or contrary to applicable law, that the company
allegedly does not pay sales tax, title fees, registration fees,
and/or other specified fees that are allegedly mandatory under
policy language or state legal authority.

The Allstate Corporation is an insurance company, headquartered in
Glenview, Illinois.


INTER-CON SECURITY: Rodriguez Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro Rodriguez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., Case No.
1:23-cv-08355 (E.D.N.Y., Nov. 9, 2023), is brought against the
Defendants who denied Plaintiffs and the Putative Collective and
Class their "gap time" compensation and overtime compensation in
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and New York
Labor Law ("NYLL").

The Collective is made up of all persons who are or have been
employed by Defendant as Security Agents at JFK at any time within
the three years prior to this action's filing date through the date
of the final disposition of this action (the "Collective Period")
and who were subject to Defendant's unlawful policy of failing to
pay overtime premiums for all hours worked over 40 in a given
workweek, and/or failing to keep accurate records of hours
Plaintiffs actually worked, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff is a former Security Agent, and presently and at all
relevant times resides in Queens, New York.

The Defendant provides security services throughout the United
States, including the New York metropolitan area.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Rachel M. Haskell, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER Q. DAVIS
          80 Broad Street, Suite 703
          New York, NY 10004
          Phone: 646-430-7930
          Fax: 646-349-2504


INTERSTATE HOTELS: De Paz Suit Removed to C.D. California
---------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Joshua De Paz, on behalf of himself and
others similarly situated v. INTERSTATE HOTELS, LLC; and DOES 1 to
100, inclusive, Case No. 23STCV24142 was removed from the Superior
Court for the County of Los Angeles, to the United States District
Court for the Central District of California on Nov. 8, 2023, and
assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-09435.

The Complaint asserts class action claims for: failure to pay wages
for all hours worked at minimum wage in violation of Labor Code;
failure to authorize or permit meal periods in violation of Labor
Code; failure to authorize or permit rest periods in violation of
Labor Code; failure to provide complete and accurate wage
statements in violation of Labor Code; failure to timely pay all
earned wages and final paychecks due at time of separation of
employment in violation of Labor Code and unfair business
practices, in violation of Business and Professions Code.[BN]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Linda Claxton, Esq.
          OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
          400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Phone: 213-239-9800
          Facsimile: 213-239-9045
          Email: linda.claxton@ogletree.com


INTOUCHCX SOLUTIONS: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Pearson Alleges
---------------------------------------------------------------
FREDDIE PEARSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. INTOUCHCX SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant, Case
No. 2:23-cv-01888 (D. Nev., Nov. 16, 2023) seeks to recover from
the Defendant unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest,
liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Plaintiff Pearson was employed by the Defendant as a call center
agent.

Intouchcx Solutions Inc. provides management solutions. The Company
offers business process outsourcing and contact center solutions.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Roger Wenthe, Esq.
          ROGER WENTHE, PLLC
          2831 St. Rose Pkwy. # 200
          Henderson, NV 89052
          Telephone: (702) 971-0541
          Email: roger.wenthe@gmail.com

IOVATE HEALTH: Schoonover Seeks Approval of Class Notice
--------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as EMILEY SCHOONOVER,
individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, v.
IOVATE HEALTH SCIENCES U.S.A. INC., a Delaware corporation, Case
No. 2:20-cv-01487-FLA-AGR (C.D. Cal.), the Plaintiff asks the Court
to enter an order approving her proposed form and method of class
notice and directing that the class notice plan to be carried out:

On August 22, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for class

certification, and certified the following Class under Fed. R. Civ.
P.
23(b):

   "All persons who, on or after February 13, 2017, purchased
instore
   in the state of California for household use and not for resale

   or distribution, Defendants Six Star Pre-Workout Explosion
and/or
   Defendant's Six Star Pre-Workout Explosion Ripped products in a
32-
   ounce container."

The Plaintiff requests that the Court, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
23, approve the class notice plan proposed herein so that certified
Class Members may be notified of their rights in advance of any
further proceedings that may affect their rights.

Iovate is a dynamic leading-edge nutritional supplement company.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Nov. 9, 2023 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/47imCSX at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Eugene Y. Turin, Esq.
          MCGUIRE LAW, P.C.
          55 W. Wacker Dr., 9th Fl.
          Chicago, IL 60601
          Telephone: (312) 893-7002, ex. 3
          E-mail: eturin@mcgpc.com

ISS FACILITY: Bid for Class Certification Continued to Jan 25, 2024
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CLAUDIA GARCIA, v. ISS
FACILITY SERVICES, INC., et al., Case No. 3:19-cv-07807-RS (N.D.
Cal.), the Hon. Judge Richard Seeborg entered an order that the
hearing on Garcia's renewed motion for class certification is
continued to January 25, 2024.

-- The parties shall pursue the Belaire process as ordered by the

    Magistrate Judge.

Additionally, however, no later than December 28, 2023, ISS shall
submit a declaration or declarations setting out:

   (1) the total number of ISS employees at the Broadridge facility

       during the class period.

   (2) the number of those employees that ISS contends signed
binding
       arbitration agreements, and who did not subsequently sign
       mediation agreements like that signed by Garcia.

   (3) the same information described in paragraphs (1) and (2), as

       applied to each of the locations where declarants Troy
Nelson
       and Joseph Butay were employed.

   (4) the same information described in paragraphs (1) and (2), as

       applied to all of the California locations where ISS placed

       employees.

Ms. Garcia was employed as a janitor and custodial detailer by
defendant ISS Facility Services California, Inc., a subsidiary of
defendant ISS Facility Services, Inc., a "leading international
facilities maintenance and staffing company" with nearly 400,000
employees worldwide.

Garcia was assigned to a facility owned by defendant Broadridge
Financial Solutions, Inc. Although Garcia contends the ISS entities
and Broadridge are all liable as her "joint employers," the present
renewed motion for class certification proposes a class of
"employees of Defendants ISS Facility Services, Inc. and ISS
Facility Services California, Inc." who worked at any location in
California, and does not implicate Broadridge as a defendant to the
class claims.

Garcia's prior motion for class certification was denied on
numerous grounds.

ISS is a workplace experience and facility management company.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 9, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/47E1LJm at no extra charge.[CC]

JACOBS SOLUTIONS: Court Enters Class Cert Sched Order in Evans
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ERIC EVANS, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. JACOBS SOLUTIONS
INC., a Delaware corporation; CH2M HILL, INC., a Florida
corporation; and DOES 1-50, Case No. 2:23-cv-01352-LK (W.D. Wash.),
the Hon. Judge Lauren King entered a Rule 16(b) and rule 23(d)(2)
scheduling order regarding class certification motion:

  Deadline to complete discovery on class        Nov. 7, 2024
  certification (not to be construed as a
  bifurcation of discovery)

  Deadline for Plaintiffs to file motion         Dec. 7, 2024
  for class certification (noted on the
  fourth Friday after filing and service
  of the motion pursuant to LCR 7(d)(3) unless
  the parties agree to different times for
  filing the response and reply memoranda).

Jacobs is an American international technical professional services
firm.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3QNASMd at no extra charge.[CC]

JAMES RIVER: Glantz Sues Over Misleading Statements on Securities
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PAUL GLANTZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. JAMES RIVER GROUP HOLDINGS, LTD., FRANK N.
D’ORAZIO, and SARAH C. DORAN, Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-10000
(S.D.N.Y., November 13, 2023) asserts claims against the Defendants
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Plaintiff Glantz brings this class action action on behalf of
persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired James
River securities between August 7, 2023 and November 7, 2023,
inclusive. Throughout the Class Period, the Defendants failed to
disclose to investors: (1) that, among other things, James River
lacked effective internal controls regarding the recognition of
reinstatement premiums for reinsurance; (2) that, as a result, the
Company overstated its net income; (3) that the Company was
reasonably likely to restate its financial results. As a result of
these materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or
failures to disclose, James River's securities traded at
artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, says the
suit.

The Plaintiff and other members of the Class purchased or otherwise
acquired James River's securities relying upon the integrity of the
market price of the Company's securities and market information
relating to James River, and have been allegedly damaged thereby.

Based in Bermuda, James River owns five insurance companies that
focused on specialty insurance niches. Its common shares trade on
the NASDAQ exchange under the symbol "JRVR." [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gregory B. Linkh, Esq.
          Rebecca Dawson, Esq.
          GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
          230 Park Ave, Suite 358
          New York, NY 10169
          Telephone: (212) 682-5340
          Facsimile: (212) 884-0988
          E-mail: glinkh@glancylaw.com

                  - and -

          Robert V. Prongay, Esq.
          Charles H. Linehan, Esq.
          GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
          1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310) 201-9150
          Facsimile: (310) 201-9160

                  - and -

          Frank R. Cruz, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICES OF FRANK R. CRUZ
          1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1100
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310) 914-5007

JEANINE KLEBER DISTRICT: Simpson Suit Transferred to N.D. Indiana
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Jennifer Sue Simpson, individually and as Next
Friend of her minor child P.C.S and on behalf of all others
similarly situated Plaintiffs v. Jeanine Kleber District Liasion
for Homeless Children, M.S.D. Southwest Allen County Schools;
Jerilynne Boneff Registar, M.S.D. Southwest Allen County Schools;
Jerilynne Boneff Registar, M.S.D. Southwest Allen County Schools;
Knowlin Ms., Fort Wayne Community Schools, Family Engagement Center
District Liaison for Homeless Children; Powerschool Group LLC, Case
No. 1:23-cv-01406 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of Indiana, to the U.S. District Court for
the Northern District of Indiana on Nov. 6, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:23-cv-00469-HAB-SLC to
the proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Civil Rights for Civil Rights
Act.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.

The Defendants are represented by:

          Jason T Clagg, Esq.
          BARNES & THORNBURG LLP - FW/IN
          888 S Harrison St Ste 600
          Fort Wayne, IN 46802
          Phone: (260) 423-9440
          Fax: (260) 424-8316
          Email: jason.clagg@btlaw.com

               - and -

          Matthew J Elliott, Esq.
          Megan M Torres, Esq.
          BECKMAN LAWSON LLP
          201 W Wayne St
          Fort Wayne, IN 46802
          Phone: (260) 422-0800
          Fax: (260) 420-1013
          Email: melliott@beckmanlawson.com
                 mtorres@beckmanlawson.com


JFC INTERNATIONAL: Lee Gets OK to Add Class Allegations
-------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MYUNG SIK LEE and INKUK
YUN v. JFC INTERNATIONAL, INC., Case No. 2:22-cv-06693-CCC-MAH
(D.N.J.), the Hon. Judge Michael A. Hammer entered an order
granting the Plaintiffs' motion to amend to add class allegations
on behalf of all similarly situated non-Japanese American employees
of JFC.

Specifically, their claim includes well-pleaded factual allegations
relating to the alleged promotional positions sought, their own
qualifications in relation to such a position, and the
qualifications of other JFC employees who were promoted instead.

Accordingly, the Plaintiffs' proposed failure-to-promote-claim
contains the necessary specificity even in the absence of a formal
promotional process.

The Plaintiffs seek to add class claims against JFC for engaging in
unlawful employment practices in violation of 42 U.S.C. sections
1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the New Jersey
Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A.

The action arises out of an employment discrimination dispute
between Plaintiffs and their employer, JFC.

JFC is a major wholesaler and distributor of Japanese and Asian
food products. Its employees are comprised of Japanese-Americans,
Chinese-Americans, Korean-Americans, Caucasians, Hispanics, and
African-Americans.

A copy of the Court's opinion dated Nov. 9, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3ul5c9C at no extra charge.[CC]

KANDI TECHNOLOGIES: Venkataraman Seeks to Certify Class Action
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Srinivasan Venkataraman,
Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v.
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc., Xiaoming Hu, Cheng Wang, Bing Mei,
Liming Chen, Jerry Lewin, and Henry Yu, Case No. 1:20-cv-08082-DEH
(S.D.N.Y.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order pursuant
to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

-- Certifying the case as a class action;

-- Appointing Plaintiff as a class representative; and

-- Appointing Lead Counsel as Class Counsel.

Kandi is a Chinese battery and electric vehicle manufacturer.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Nov. 10, 2023 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/49FFkW1 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Robert V. Prongay, Esq.
          Ex Kano S. Sams II, Esq.
          Charles H. Linehan, Esq.
          Pavithra Rajesh, Esq.
          GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
          1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310) 201-9150
          Facsimile: (310) 201-9160
          E-mail: clinehan@glancylaw.com

                - and -

          Howard G. Smith, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH
          3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112
          Bensalem, PA 19020
          Telephone: (215) 638-4847
          Facsimile: (215) 638-4867

KENDO HOLDINGS: Radvansky Files TCPA Suit in N.D. Georgia
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kendo Holdings, Inc.
The case is styled as Ethan Radvansky, on behalf of himself and
others similarly situated v. Kendo Holdings, Inc. doing business
as: Fenty Beauty, Case No. 3:23-cv-00214-TCB (N.D. Ga., Nov. 9,
2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act.

Kendo Holdings, Inc. doing business as Fenty Beauty (stylized as
FENTY BEAUTY) -- https://fentybeauty.com/ -- is a cosmetics brand
by Rihanna.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Aaron D. Radbil, Esq.
          James Davidson, Esq.
          GREENWALD DAVIDSON & RADBIL, PLLC
          5550 Glades Road, Suite 500
          Boca Raton, FL 33431
          Phone: (561) 826-5477
          Email: aradbil@gdrlawfirm.com
                 jdavidson@gdrlawfirm.com

               - and -

          Anthony Paronich, Esq.
          PARONICH LAW, P.C.
          350 Lincoln St., Suite 2400
          Hingham, MA 02043
          Phone: (615) 485-0018
          Email: anthony@paronichlaw.com

               - and -

          Steven Howard Koval, Esq.
          THE KOVAL FIRM, LLC
          Building 15, Suite 120
          3575 Piedmont Rd. NE
          Atlanta, GA 30305
          Phone: (404) 513-6651
          Fax: (404) 549-4654
          Email: shkoval@aol.com


KENTUCKY HOSPITALITY: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Hadder Alleges
---------------------------------------------------------------
NASHAE HADDER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. KENTUCKY HOSPITALITY VENTURE, LLC D/B/A
SPEARMINT RHINO GENTLEMAN'S CLUB, Defendant, Case No.
5:23-cv-00317-GFVT (E.D. Ky., November 13, 2023) seeks to recover
judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant as well as
all remaining damages, including but not limited to liquidated
damages and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs under the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiff Hadder was employed as an entertainer/dancer at the
Spearmint Rhino, from February 2019 through August 2023. However,
the Defendant miscategorized Plaintiff Hadder as an independent
contractor and even required her to pay to come to work. In
addition, Defendant also failed to pay the Plaintiff and all others
similarly situated the minimum wage and overtime for hours worked,
the suit asserts.

Kentucky Hospitality Venture LLC owns and operates an adult
entertainment club called Spearmint Rhino in Fayette County,
Kentucky.  [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         J. Corey Asay, Esq.
         HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP
         312 Walnut Street, Suite 1600
         Cincinnati, OH 45202
         Telephone: (513) 318-4496
         Facsimile: (513) 318-4496
         E-mail: casay@hkm.com

KINGSBOROUGH ATLAS: Diaz Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kingsborough Atlas
Tree Surgery, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Elias Diaz, on
behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and the
general public v. Kingsborough Atlas Tree Surgery, Inc., Case No.
23CV011375 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., Nov. 8, 2023).

Kingsborough Atlas Tree -- https://www.atlas-tree.com/ -- provides
the most diverse residential, commercial, and municipal tree
services in Sonoma County.[BN]

KONICA MINOLTA: Luense Seeks to Certify Class
----------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as RAY ALLEN LUENSE, PAMELA
PEARSON, DANIEL F. SETTNEK and NEIL ROSE, individually and as
representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on
behalf of the Konica Minolta 401(k) Plan, v. KONICA MINOLTA
BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC., BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KONICA
MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC., KONICA MINOLTA 401(K) PLAN
COMMITTEE, SANDRA SOHL, SUSAN MCCARTHY, and JOHN DOES 1-30, Case
No. 2:20-cv-06827-EP-JSA (D.N.J.), the Plaintiffs move the Court
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 for entry of an Order
granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification.

The Class is proposed to be defined as follows:

   "All persons, except Defendants and their immediate family
members,
   who were participants in or beneficiaries of the Konica Minolta

   401(k) Plan, at any time between June 4, 2014, and the present
(the
   "Class Period")."

Konica provides management technologies and IT Services.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated Nov. 10, 2023 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3un575j at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Eric Lechtzin, Esq.
          Marc H. Edelson, Esq.
          EDELSON LECHTZIN LLP
          411 S. State Street, Suite N-300
          Newtown, PA 18940
          Telephone: (215) 867-2399
          E-mail: elechtzin@edelson-law.com
                  medelson@edelson-law.com

                - and -

          Julie S. Selesnick, Esq.
          Natalie Lesser, Esq.
          Abigail J. Gertner, Esq.
          BERGER MONTAGUE PC
          1818 Market Street, Suite 3600
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Telephone: (215) 875-3000
          Facsimile: (215) 875-4604
          E-mail: jselesnick@bm.net
                  agertner@bm.net
                  nlesser@bm.net

KROGER CO: Faces Privacy Lawsuit Over Disclosure of Sensitive Info
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jane Doe, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. The Kroger Co., Defendant, Case No. 1:23-cv-00750-MWM
(S.D. Ohio, November 13, 2023) seeks to address the Defendant's
unlawful of procuring the interception of and disclosing
Plaintiff's and Class Members' confidential personally identifiable
information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) to third
parties, including Meta Platforms, Inc. d/b/a Meta (Facebook),
without consent, asserting claims against the Defendant for
invasion of privacy, breach of confidence, breach of implied
contract, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and for violations
of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.

The Plaintiff and other Class Members who used Defendant's Website
understandably thought they were communicating only with a trusted
medical provider. Unbeknownst to Plaintiff and Class Members,
however, Defendant had embedded the Facebook Tracking Pixel into
its Website, surreptitiously Plaintiff and Class Members to
transmit their private information to Facebook, without consent.
Operating as designed and as implemented by Defendant, the Pixel
allows the private information that Plaintiff and Class Members
submit to Defendant to be unlawfully disclosed to Facebook
alongside the individual's unique and persistent Facebook ID, says
the suit.

In addition to the Facebook Pixel, Defendant also installed and
implemented Facebook's Conversions Application Programming
Interface (CAPI) on its Website servers. CAPI tracks the user's
website interaction, including their Private Information, then
records and stores that information on the website owner's servers,
to then in turn transmit the data to Facebook from the website
owner's servers. Moreover, the Defendant utilized the Pixel and
CAPI data for marketing purposes in an effort to bolster its
profits, the suit alleges.

Headquartered in Cincinnati, OH, The Kroger Co. is one of the
largest supermarket operators in the United States, employing
approximately 465,000 individuals nationwide. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Joseph M. Lyon, Esq.
          Kevin M. Cox, Esq.
          THE LYON FIRM
          2754 Erie Avenue
          Cincinnati, OH 45208
          Telephone: (513) 381-2333
          Facsimile: (513) 766-9011
          E-mail: jlyon@thelyonfirm.com
                  kcox@thelyonfirm.com

                  - and -

          Philip J. Krzeski, Esq.
          Bryan L. Bleichner, Esq.
          CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA
          100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1700
          Minneapolis, MN 55401
          Telephone: (612) 339-7300
          Facsimile: (612) 336-2940
          E-mail: bbleichner@chestnutcambronne.com
                  pkrzeski@chestnutcambronne.com

KUBOTA TRACTOR: Tucker Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kubota Tractor
Corporation. The case is styled as Henry Tucker, on behalf of
himself and all other persons similarly situated v. Kubota Tractor
Corporation, Case No. 1:23-cv-09855 (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 7, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Kubota Tractor Corporation -- https://www.kubotausa.com/ -- is the
U.S. marketer and distributor of Kubota-branded equipment.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dana Lauren Gottlieb, Esq.
          GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
          150 E. 18th St., Suite PHR
          New York, NY 10003
          Phone: (212) 228-9795
          Fax: (212) 982-6284
          Email: danalgottlieb@aol.com


KYNAH INC: Gonzalez Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
---------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kynah, Inc. The case
is styled as Yanilza Gonzalez, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated v. Kynah, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-09737-VSB
(S.D.N.Y., Nov. 3, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Kynah, Inc. -- https://shopkynah.com/ -- offers Indian clothing and
custom bridal wear based in Los Angeles, California USA.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noor Abou-Saab, I, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF NOOR A. SAAB
          380 North Broadway, Suite 300
          Jericho, NY 11753
          Phone: (718) 740-5060
          Email: noorasaablaw@gmail.com


LADY JANE'S: Plaintiffs Seek Conditional Status of Employees
------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Jamie Gavin, Lindsay
Gibbons, and Jhamya Winters, On behalf of themselves and those
similarly situated, v. Lady Jane’s Haircuts for Men Holding
Company, LLC, Case No. 2:23-cv-12602-SJM-APP (E.D. Mich.), the
Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order authorizing them to send
notice of the pendency of the action to their similarly situated
coworkers.

Specifically, Plaintiffs seek conditional certification of the
following employees:

   "All current and former stylists employed at Lady Jane's salons,

   other than salons located in Ohio, between the date three years

   prior to filing of the original complaint and the present."

The case is a wage and hour lawsuit filed on behalf of the
hairstylists who have worked at Lady Jane’s men's-only salons
that are operated by Defendants across the United States.

The Plaintiffs allege that all of the hairstylists that work at
Defendants' salons are subject to the following same or similar
circumstances, which result in a violation or violations of the
Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").

Lady Jane's is a men's grooming salon.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated Nov. 9, 2023, is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/46o2pK2 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Andrew R. Biller, Esq.
          Andrew P. Kimble, Esq.
          Laura E. Farmwald, Esq.
          Emily A. Hubbard, Esq.
          BILLER & KIMBLE, LLC
          8044 Montgomery Rd., Ste. 515
          Cincinnati, OH 45236
          Telephone: (513) 715-8711
          Facsimile: (614) 340-4620
          E-mail: abiller@billerkimble.com
                  akimble@billerkimble.com
                  lfarmwald@billerkimble.com
                  ehubbard@billerkimble.com

                - and -

          Matthew J. Clark, Esq.
          GREGORY, MOORE, BROOKS & CLARK, P.C.
          Grand Park Centre
          28 W. Adams, Suite 300
          Detroit, MI 48226
          Telephone: (313) 964-5600
          Facsimile: (313) 964-2125
          E-mail: Matt@unionlaw.net

LANE COLLEGE: Faces Young Suit Over ADA Violation in S.D.N.Y.
-------------------------------------------------------------
LESHAWN YOUNG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. LANE COLLEGE, Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-10108 (S.D.N.Y., November 16, 2023) is a class action
against the Defendant for violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

The nature of the suit is stated as 446 Civil Rights - American
with Disabilities - Other.

Lane College is a private college in Jackson, Tennessee. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Michael A. LaBollita, Esq.
         GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
         150 E. 18th Street, Suite 10003
         New York, NY 10003
         Telephone: (212) 228-9795
         E-mail: michael@gottlieb.legal

LAPSTONE & HAMMER: Gomberg Files ADA Suit in E.D. Pennsylvania
--------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Lapstone & Hammer,
Inc. The case is styled as Matthew Gomberg, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated v. Lapstone & Hammer, Inc., Case
No. 2:23-cv-04305 (E.D. Pa., Nov. 3, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Lapstone & Hammer -- https://www.lapstoneandhammer.com/ -- is a
premier lifestyle brand specializing in Premium Sportswear,
Streetwear and Menswear.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          David S. Glanzberg, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GLANZBERG
          123 S. Broad Street, Suite 1640
          Philadelphia, PA 19109
          Phone: (215) 981-5400
          Fax: (267) 319-1993
          Email: david.glanzberg@gtlawpc.com


LIBERTY HOME GUARD: Johnson Files TCPA Suit in E.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Liberty Home Guard
LLC. The case is styled as Virginia Johnson, Individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. Liberty Home Guard LLC
d/b/a LIberty Home Guard, Case No. 1:23-cv-08301 (E.D.N.Y., Nov. 8,
2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act.

Liberty Home Guard LLC -- https://www.libertyhomeguard.com/ --
ideate, research, develop, and provide services that change lives
for homeowners across the country, every day.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ross Howard Schmierer, Esq.
          KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
          275 Seventh Avenue, 7th Floor, Suite 410
          New York, NY 10001
          Phone: (800) 400-6808
          Email: ross@kazlg.com


LONG POINT: Kohlberg Class Suit Moved From S.D.N.Y. to N.D.N.Y.
---------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled MARJORIE KOHLBERG, et al., individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. TOM BIRDSEY, et al.,
Case No. 1:22-cv-03079, was transferred from the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York to the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of New York on November 16, 2023.

The Clerk of Court for the Northern District of New York assigned
Case No. 1:23-cv-01437-AMN-DJS to the proceeding.

The Plaintiffs bring the complaint on their own behalf and as a
class action on behalf of all present redemption noteholders, Group
1 noteholders and Group 2 noteholders of EYP Holdings, Inc. and EYP
Group Holdings, Inc. (collectively, "EYP") who did not culpably
participate in the disloyal creation and implementation of the
Defendants' Employee Stock Ownership Plan scheme at EYP.

Long Point Capital, Inc. is a private investment firm in New York,
New York.

Long Point Capital Fund II, L.P. is a buyout fund managed by Long
Point Capital in New York, New York.

Long Point Capital Partners II, L.P. is a capital market company in
New York, New York.

Long Point Capital Fund III, L.P. is a buyout fund managed by Long
Point Capital in New York, New York.

Long Point Capital Partners III, L.P. is a capital market company
in New York, New York.

GreatBanc Trust Company is an advisory firm based in Lisle,
Illinois. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                                 
                                    
         
         Jonathan M. Sperling, Esq.
         Christopher Y. L. Yeung, Esq.
         COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
         The New York Times Building
         620 Eighth Avenue
         New York, NY 10018
         Telephone: (212) 841-1000
         Email: jsperling@cov.com
                cyeung@cov.com

LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA: Berg Suit Seeks Class Certification
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as KRIZIA BERG, et al., v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-07870-DMG-PD (C.D.
Cal.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order certifying
this case as a class action pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(2),
23(b)(3), 23(b)(1) (or alternatively or conjunctively 23(c)(4)):

   1. Injunctive relief class (F.R.Civ.P Rule 23(b)(2))

      The proposed Injunctive Relief Class is defined as:

      "All persons who have in the past participated, presently are

      participating, or may in the future participate in, or be
      present at, demonstrations within the jurisdiction of the
County
      of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (LASD) in the exercise of

      their rights of free speech, assembly and petition in
general,
      and particularly as it relates to protesting police violence

      and/or discrimination.

      The proposed injunctive relief class representatives are
Diana
      Barbadillo, Krizia Berg, Keyanna Bean, Grace Bryant, Noelani
del
      Rosario-Sabet, Linda Jiang, Taegan Meyer, Serena Militant,
      Christian Monroe, Joe Mischo, Jillian O’Neil, Shakeer
Rahman,
      David Ramirez, Jessica Rogers, Vishal Singh, Cliff Smith,
Austin
      Tharpe, Travis Wells and Devon Young.

   2. Damages Classes (F.R.Civ.P Rule 23(b)(3))

      The propsed damages classes are defined as:

      Arrest Class:

      "All persons present at or during the aftermath of protests
      against police misconduct on June 3, 2020 and June 21, 2020,
who
      were arrested by the LASD on misdemeanor charges of failure
to
      obey a curfew or failure to disperse and who were subjected
to
      tight hand-cuffing for hours, detained in crowded LASD
vehicles
      and denied access to bathrooms and water."


      The proposed Class Representatives for this class are Krizia

      Berg, Sebastian (Serena) Militante, Grace Bryant, del
Rosario-
      Sabet, Travis Wells, Christian Monroe, and Austin Tharpe.

      Direct Force Class:

      "All persons present at or during the aftermath of protests
      regarding the killing of George Floyd in the County of Los
      Angeles, and similar protests against police misconduct on
May
      30, June 21, August 25, September 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19 and 25,

      2020 and June 12, 2021 who were engaged in peaceful protest
      and/or observing the proceedings and were subjected to force

      with so-called "less-lethal weapons," such as rubber bullets
or
      projectiles, tear gas, or similar chemical agents, flashbangs

      and/or other similar munitions, by LASD deputies."

      The proposed Class Representatives for this class are Shakeer

      Rahman, Vishal Singh, Diana Barbadillo, Jillian O’Neil,
Jessica
      Rogers, Cliff Smith, Devon Young, Linda Jiang, Taegan Meyer,

      Keyanna Bean, Austin Tharpe, David Ramirez, and Joe Mischo.

In the aftermath of the death of George Floyd and other persons of
color, many people took to the streets to exercise their First
Amendment rights and protest police violence.

LASD responded by broadly treating the protestors, regardless of
their actions, as criminals deserving to suffer.

First, Defendants indiscriminately launched so-called "less-lethal"
weapons, including 40 mm projectiles, pepper balls, and tear gas
and other chemical agents against persons engaged in peaceful
protests. Indeed, this Court issued a Preliminary Injunction issued
on July 6, 2021 enjoining the use of certain projectiles against
peaceful protesters based on similar evidence presented in support
of this motion.

Second, during the height of the COVID pandemic, the LASD made mass
arrests of peaceful protesters, illegally detained them in tight
zip ties, and held them in crowded vehicles in close proximity for
several hours without access to water or restrooms, while failing
to
maintain proper COVID safety protocols.

Los Angeles is the most populous non–state-level government
entity in the United States.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated Nov. 10, 2023 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3ujNmDT at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Paul Hoffman, Esq.
          Michael D. Seplow, Esq.
          John Washington, Esq.
          SCHONBRUN SEPLOW HARRIS,
          HOFFMAN & ZELDES LLP
          9415 Culver Blvd, 115
          Culver City, CA 90232
          Telephone: (310) 396-0731
          Facsimile: (310) 399-7040
          E-mail: hoffpaul@aol.com
                  mseplow@sshhzlaw.com
                  jwashington@sshhzlaw.com

                - and -

          Colleen M. Mullen, Esq.
          MCELROY PARRIS TRIAL LAWYERS, APLC
          407 Bryant Circle, Ste. F
          Ojai, CA 93023
          Telephone: (805) 272-4001
          E-mail: colleen@mcelroyparris.com

                - and -

          Arnoldo Casillas, Esq.
          CASILLAS & ASSOCIATES
          3777 Long Beach Blvd., 3RD FLO,
          Long Beach, CA 90807
          Telephone: (323) 725-0350
          E-mail: acasillas@casillaslegal.com

                - and -

          Morgan Ricketts, Esq.
          Rebecca Brown, Esq.
          HADSELL STORMER RENICK & DAI LLP
          128 N. Fair Oaks Ave.
          Pasadena, CA 91103
          Telephone: (626) 585-9600
          Facsimile: (626) 585-9600
          E-mail: mricketts@hadsellstormer.com
                  rbrown@hadsellstormer.com

LYONS SECURITY: Hayden-Thrasher Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Lyons Security
Service, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Joshua Hayden-Thrasher,
on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Lyons Security
Service, Inc., Case No. 23CV011380 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento
Cty., Nov. 8, 2023).

Lyons Security Service, Inc. -- https://www.lyonssecurityinc.com/
-- is a privately-held, woman-owned, small business enterprise
security service company.[BN]

MAINE-LY RED WING: Zelvin Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Maine-Ly Red Wing,
Inc. The case is styled as Lynn Zelvin, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated v. Maine-Ly Red Wing, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-09813 (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 6, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Maine-Ly Red Wing, Inc. was founded in 1976. The Company's line of
business includes the retail sale of mens, womens, and childrens
footwear.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          10826 64th Avenue, Ste. 2nd Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


MAJID JAMALI: Stroude Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Majid Jamali, DMD,
P.C. The case is styled as Colette Stroude, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated v. Majid Jamali, DMD, P.C., Case
No. 1:23-cv-08336 (E.D.N.Y., Nov. 9, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Dr. Jamali -- https://www.omsofny.com/dr-jamali/ -- is a
board-certified oral and maxillofacial surgeon.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


MANHATTAN BEER: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Curcio Alleges
---------------------------------------------------------
DANIEL CURCIO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. MANHATTAN BEER DISTRIBUTORS, LLC; CRAIG
REMHILD; and WILLIAM MARINARO, Defendants, Case No. 2:23-cv-08502
(E.D.N.Y., Nov. 15, 2023) is an action against the Defendant for
failure to pay minimum wages, overtime compensation, provide meals,
and provide accurate wage statements.

Plaintiff Curcio was employed by the Defendants as a driver.

MANHATTAN BEER DISTRIBUTORS, LLC owns and operates a beer
distribution company which distributes beer in Nassau and Suffolk
Counties as well as New York City. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Amit Kumar, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM CAFARO
          108 West 39th Street, Suite 602
          New York, NY 10018
          Telephone: (212) 583-7400
          Email: AKumar@CafaroEsq.com

MARS PETCARE: Moore Bid to Strike Butler Declaration Partly OK'd
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as TAMARA MOORE, et al., v.
MARS PETCARE US, INC., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-07001-MMC (N.D.
Cal.), the Hon. Judge Maxine M. Chesney entered an order granting
in part and denying in part the Plaintiffs' motion to strike:

By the instant motion, plaintiffs seek to strike the "June 27, 2023
Declaration of Sarah Butler," which was submitted by defendants in
support of Hill's opposition to class certification and defendants'
motions to exclude expert testimony.

The Plaintiffs contend the declaration improperly includes an
expert opinion offered for the first time after the deadline for
expert discovery and, as an alternative to striking, submit a
proposed additional declaration by Rebecca Reed-Arthurs.

Accordingly, to the extent plaintiffs seek to strike Butler’s
declaration, the motion is denied, and, to the extent plaintiffs
seek leave to submit Reed-Arthurs's proposed additional
declaration, the motion is granted.

Mars Petcare provides pet care products.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/46lIk7k at no extra charge.[CC]

 


MASS GENERAL: Cashman Sues Over Below Hospital Standard of Care
---------------------------------------------------------------
MELINDA CASHMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INC.; THE SALEM
HOSPITAL INC.; and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants, Case No. ________
(Mass. Super., Suffolk Cty., Nov. 16, 2023) alleges that the
Plaintiff was exposed or potentially exposed to infection of HIV
and Hepatitis B and C due to the negligent administration of
intravenous medications by staff of the Defendant's hospital that
fell beneath applicable standards of care.

According to the complaint, the negligent acts of the Defendants
have caused and continue to cause the Plaintiff and the Class to
suffer permanent injuries, including additional testing and extreme
anxiety and emotional distress and decreased quality of life as a
result of being exposed or potentially being exposed to an
infection and, potentially, suffering a serious infection.

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INC.operates as a non-profit organization. The
Organization offers patient care, rehabilitation, medical research
and discovery, teaching, specialty pharmacy, and other health care
services. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jeffrey N. Catalano, Esq.
          Jonathan D. Sweet, Esq.
          Patrick J. Nelligan, Esq.
          KECHES LAW GROUP, P.C.
          2 Granite Ave. Suite 400
          Milton, MA 02186
          Telephone: (508) 821-4387
          Facsimile: (508) 822-8022
          Email: jcatalano@kecheslaw.com
                 jsweet@kecheslaw.com
                 pnelligan@kecheslaw.com

MAXIMUS INC: Santanelli Suit Transferred to D. Massachusetts
------------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Vincent Santanelli, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated v. MAXIMUS, INC. and MAXIMUS FEDERAL
SERVICES, INC., Case No. 1:23-cv-01355 was transferred from the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, to the
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on Nov. 3,
2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:23-cv-12659-ADB to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Property.

MAXIMUS Federal Services, Inc. -- https://maximus.com/ -- provides
health and human care services. The Company provides consulting,
child support, education, business, and workforce services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Christopher Eric Berman, Esq.
          Shamis & Gentile, P.A.
          14 NE 1st Ave., Suite 705
          Miami, FL 33132
          Phone: (305) 479-2299
          Fax: (786) 623-0915
          Email: cberman@shamisgentile.com

               - and -

          Lindsey Caryn Grossman, Esq.
          Michael Elliot Criden, Esq.
          CRIDEN & LOVE PA
          7301 SW 57th Court, Suite 515
          South Miami, FL 33143
          Phone: (305) 357-9000
          Fax: (305) 357-9050
          Email: lgrossman@cridenlove.com
                 mcriden@cridenlove.com

               - and -

          Jared Robert Butcher, Esq.
          BERLINER CORCORAN & ROWE LLP
          1101 Seventeenth Street NW, Suite 1100
          Washington, DC 20036
          Phone: (202) 293-5555
          Email: jbutcher@bcrlaw.com


META PLATFORMS: Sued Over Dangerous Social Media Products
---------------------------------------------------------
Anchorage School District, and others similarly situated v. META
PLATFORMS, INC.; FACEBOOK HOLDINGS, LLC; FACEBOOK OPERATIONS, LLC;
INSTAGRAM, LLC; SICULUS, INC.; META PAYMENTS, INC.; SNAP INC.;
TIKTOK, INC.; BYTEDANCE, INC.; GOOGLE LLC; and YOUTUBE LLC, Case
No. 4:23-cv-05730 (N.D. Cal., Nov. 7, 2023), is brought claiming
for public nuisance and negligence arising from Defendants'
unreasonably dangerous social media products and their failure to
warn of such dangers and arising from an egregious breach of the
public trust by Defendants Meta Platforms, Inc. (hereinafter, "Meta
Platforms"), Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC,
Instagram, LLC (hereinafter, "Instagram") (collectively--"Meta"),
together with Snap Inc. (hereinafter, "Snap"), TikTok, Inc.
(hereinafter, "TikTok"), and ByteDance, Inc. (hereinafter,
"ByteDance") (hereinafter, collectively, "Non-Meta," and, together
with "Meta," "Defendants").

In the past decade, youth in America have engaged with Defendants'
products at an exponential rate. This increase in youth using
social media is the direct result of Defendants' calculated efforts
to encourage and addict adolescents to endlessly use their
products--Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube.

The Defendants do not charge their users for these products, but
instead receive money from advertisers who pay a premium to target
advertisements to specific categories of people as studied and
sorted by Defendants' algorithms. Thus, Defendants generate revenue
based upon the total time users spend on the application, which
directly correlates with the number of advertisements that can be
shown to each user.

The defects in Defendants' products vary somewhat, but all
Defendants' products have inadequate age verification measures;
insufficient parental controls; algorithmically-generated, endless
feeds to keep users scrolling in an induced "flow state;"
"intermittent variable rewards" that manipulate dopamine delivery;
and mechanisms to reward extreme usage while producing harmful
social comparison. These defects, along with others discussed
throughout this complaint, cause Defendants' products to be
harmfully addictive, which in turn causes additional related
injuries.

Excessive screen time is especially harmful to adolescents' mental
health, sleep patterns, and emotional well-being. Yet, Defendants'
products lack any warnings (to users in general, minor users, or
their parents) that foreseeable product use can cause injury to
users' mental and physical health, rendering the products
unreasonably dangerous. Defendants' products contain designs
intended to circumvent parental oversight.

The Defendants know that minors are much more vulnerable to serious
psychological harm through social media use than adults.
Nevertheless, Defendants knowingly seek to grow the use of their
products by minors through designs, algorithms, and policies that
promote addiction, compulsive use, and other severe mental harm.

Rather than making meaningful changes to safeguard the health and
safety of its users, Defendants have consistently chosen to
prioritize profit over safety by continuing to implement product
designs that increase the frequency and duration of users'
engagement, resulting in the pernicious harms.

As a result, Plaintiff, as part of its mission as an educational
institution that shapes the minds of youth, provides mental health
services to its students. Plaintiff trains its teachers and staff
to screen students for mental health symptoms and provide or refer
them to services, such as those offered by school-based health
clinics operated in partnership with behavioral health agencies.
Plaintiff continues to hire mental health professionals to keep up
with the ever-growing need of its students, but there is no end in
sight. Plaintiff needs much more, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff Anchorage School District ("Anchorage Schools")
serves nearly 43,000 students.

The Defendants own and operate some of the largest social media
companies in the world.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Thomas P. Cartmell, Esq.
          Jonathan P. Kieffer, Esq.
          Austin Brane, Esq.
          WAGSTAFF & CARTMELL LLP
          4740 Grand Avenue, Suite 300
          Kansas City, MO 64112
          Phone: (816) 701-1100
          Email: tcartmell@wcllp.com
                 jpkieffer@wcllp.com
                 abrane@wcllp.com


META PLATFORMS: Sued Over Dangerous Social Media Products
---------------------------------------------------------
Loudoun County Public Schools, and others similarly situated v.
META PLATFORMS, INC.; FACEBOOK HOLDINGS, LLC; FACEBOOK OPERATIONS,
LLC; INSTAGRAM, LLC; SICULUS, INC.; META PAYMENTS, INC.; SNAP INC.;
TIKTOK, INC.; BYTEDANCE, INC.; GOOGLE LLC; and YOUTUBE LLC, Case
No. 4:23-cv-05738 (N.D. Cal., Nov. 7, 2023), is brought claiming
for public nuisance and negligence arising from Defendants'
unreasonably dangerous social media products and their failure to
warn of such dangers and arising from an egregious breach of the
public trust by Defendants Meta Platforms, Inc. (hereinafter, "Meta
Platforms"), Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC,
Instagram, LLC (hereinafter, "Instagram") (collectively--"Meta"),
together with Snap Inc. (hereinafter, "Snap"), TikTok, Inc.
(hereinafter, "TikTok"), and ByteDance, Inc. (hereinafter,
"ByteDance") (hereinafter, collectively, "Non-Meta," and, together
with "Meta," "Defendants").

In the past decade, youth in America have engaged with Defendants'
products at an exponential rate. This increase in youth using
social media is the direct result of Defendants' calculated efforts
to encourage and addict adolescents to endlessly use their
products--Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube.

The Defendants do not charge their users for these products, but
instead receive money from advertisers who pay a premium to target
advertisements to specific categories of people as studied and
sorted by Defendants' algorithms. Thus, Defendants generate revenue
based upon the total time users spend on the application, which
directly correlates with the number of advertisements that can be
shown to each user.

The defects in Defendants' products vary somewhat, but all
Defendants' products have inadequate age verification measures;
insufficient parental controls; algorithmically-generated, endless
feeds to keep users scrolling in an induced "flow state;"
"intermittent variable rewards" that manipulate dopamine delivery;
and mechanisms to reward extreme usage while producing harmful
social comparison. These defects, along with others discussed
throughout this complaint, cause Defendants' products to be
harmfully addictive, which in turn causes additional related
injuries.

Excessive screen time is especially harmful to adolescents' mental
health, sleep patterns, and emotional well-being. Yet, Defendants'
products lack any warnings (to users in general, minor users, or
their parents) that foreseeable product use can cause injury to
users' mental and physical health, rendering the products
unreasonably dangerous. Defendants' products contain designs
intended to circumvent parental oversight.

The Defendants know that minors are much more vulnerable to serious
psychological harm through social media use than adults.
Nevertheless, Defendants knowingly seek to grow the use of their
products by minors through designs, algorithms, and policies that
promote addiction, compulsive use, and other severe mental harm.

Rather than making meaningful changes to safeguard the health and
safety of its users, Defendants have consistently chosen to
prioritize profit over safety by continuing to implement product
designs that increase the frequency and duration of users'
engagement, resulting in the pernicious harms.

As a result, Plaintiff, as part of its mission as an educational
institution that shapes the minds of youth, provides mental health
services to its students. Plaintiff trains its teachers and staff
to screen students for mental health symptoms and provide or refer
them to services, such as those offered by school-based health
clinics operated in partnership with behavioral health agencies.
Plaintiff continues to hire mental health professionals to keep up
with the ever-growing need of its students, but there is no end in
sight. Plaintiff needs much more, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff Loudoun County Public Schools ("Loudoun County
Schools") serves approximately 82,000 students.

The Defendants own and operate some of the largest social media
companies in the world.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Thomas P. Cartmell, Esq.
          Jonathan P. Kieffer, Esq.
          Austin Brane, Esq.
          WAGSTAFF & CARTMELL LLP
          4740 Grand Avenue, Suite 300
          Kansas City, MO 64112
          Phone: (816) 701-1100
          Email: tcartmell@wcllp.com
                 jpkieffer@wcllp.com
                 abrane@wcllp.com


META PLATFORMS: Sued Over Egregious Breach of Public Trust
----------------------------------------------------------
Dekalb County School District, and others similarly situated v.
META PLATFORMS, INC.; FACEBOOK HOLDINGS, LLC; FACEBOOK OPERATIONS,
LLC; INSTAGRAM, LLC; SICULUS, INC.; META PAYMENTS, INC.; SNAP INC.;
TIKTOK, INC.; BYTEDANCE, INC.; GOOGLE LLC; and YOUTUBE LLC, Case
No. 4:23-cv-05733 (N.D. Cal., Nov. 7, 2023), is brought claiming
for public nuisance and negligence arising from Defendants'
unreasonably dangerous social media products and their failure to
warn of such dangers and arising from an egregious breach of the
public trust by Defendants Meta Platforms, Inc. (hereinafter, "Meta
Platforms"), Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC,
Instagram, LLC (hereinafter, "Instagram") (collectively--"Meta"),
together with Snap Inc. (hereinafter, "Snap"), TikTok, Inc.
(hereinafter, "TikTok"), and ByteDance, Inc. (hereinafter,
"ByteDance") (hereinafter, collectively, "Non-Meta," and, together
with "Meta," "Defendants").

In the past decade, youth in America have engaged with Defendants'
products at an exponential rate. This increase in youth using
social media is the direct result of Defendants' calculated efforts
to encourage and addict adolescents to endlessly use their
products--Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube. The
Defendants do not charge their users for these products, but
instead receive money from advertisers who pay a premium to target
advertisements to specific categories of people as studied and
sorted by Defendants' algorithms. Thus, Defendants generate revenue
based upon the total time users spend on the application, which
directly correlates with the number of advertisements that can be
shown to each user.

The defects in Defendants' products vary somewhat, but all
Defendants' products have inadequate age verification measures;
insufficient parental controls; algorithmically-generated, endless
feeds to keep users scrolling in an induced "flow state;"
"intermittent variable rewards" that manipulate dopamine delivery;
and mechanisms to reward extreme usage while producing harmful
social comparison. These defects, along with others discussed
throughout this complaint, cause Defendants' products to be
harmfully addictive, which in turn causes additional related
injuries.

Excessive screen time is especially harmful to adolescents' mental
health, sleep patterns, and emotional well-being. Yet, Defendants'
products lack any warnings (to users in general, minor users, or
their parents) that foreseeable product use can cause injury to
users' mental and physical health, rendering the products
unreasonably dangerous. Defendants' products contain designs
intended to circumvent parental oversight.

The Defendants know that minors are much more vulnerable to serious
psychological harm through social media use than adults.
Nevertheless, Defendants knowingly seek to grow the use of their
products by minors through designs, algorithms, and policies that
promote addiction, compulsive use, and other severe mental harm.
Rather than making meaningful changes to safeguard the health and
safety of its users, Defendants have consistently chosen to
prioritize profit over safety by continuing to implement product
designs that increase the frequency and duration of users'
engagement, resulting in the pernicious harms.

As a result, Plaintiff, as part of its mission as an educational
institution that shapes the minds of youth, provides mental health
services to its students. Plaintiff trains its teachers and staff
to screen students for mental health symptoms and provide or refer
them to services, such as those offered by school-based health
clinics operated in partnership with behavioral health agencies.
Plaintiff continues to hire mental health professionals to keep up
with the ever-growing need of its students, but there is no end in
sight. Plaintiff needs much more, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff DeKalb County School District ("DeKalb County
Schools") serves more than 92,000 students.

The Defendants own and operate some of the largest social media
companies in the world.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Thomas P. Cartmell, Esq.
          Jonathan P. Kieffer, Esq.
          Austin Brane, Esq.
          WAGSTAFF & CARTMELL LLP
          4740 Grand Avenue, Suite 300
          Kansas City, MO 64112
          Phone: (816) 701-1100
          Email: tcartmell@wcllp.com
                 jpkieffer@wcllp.com
                 abrane@wcllp.com


META PLATFORMS: Sued Over Public Nuisance and Negligence
--------------------------------------------------------
Jefferson County School District R-1, and others similarly situated
v. META PLATFORMS, INC.; FACEBOOK HOLDINGS, LLC; FACEBOOK
OPERATIONS, LLC; INSTAGRAM, LLC; SICULUS, INC.; META PAYMENTS,
INC.; SNAP INC.; TIKTOK, INC.; BYTEDANCE, INC.; GOOGLE LLC; and
YOUTUBE LLC, Case No. 4:23-cv-05741-YGR (N.D. Cal., Nov. 7, 2023),
is brought claiming for public nuisance and negligence arising from
Defendants' unreasonably dangerous social media products and their
failure to warn of such dangers and arising from an egregious
breach of the public trust by Defendants Meta Platforms, Inc.
(hereinafter, "Meta Platforms"), Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook
Operations, LLC, Instagram, LLC (hereinafter, "Instagram")
(collectively--"Meta"), together with Snap Inc. (hereinafter,
"Snap"), TikTok, Inc. (hereinafter, "TikTok"), and ByteDance, Inc.
(hereinafter, "ByteDance") (hereinafter, collectively, "Non-Meta,"
and, together with "Meta," "Defendants").

In the past decade, youth in America have engaged with Defendants'
products at an exponential rate. This increase in youth using
social media is the direct result of Defendants' calculated efforts
to encourage and addict adolescents to endlessly use their
products--Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube. The
Defendants do not charge their users for these products, but
instead receive money from advertisers who pay a premium to target
advertisements to specific categories of people as studied and
sorted by Defendants' algorithms. Thus, Defendants generate revenue
based upon the total time users spend on the application, which
directly correlates with the number of advertisements that can be
shown to each user.

The defects in Defendants' products vary somewhat, but all
Defendants' products have inadequate age verification measures;
insufficient parental controls; algorithmically-generated, endless
feeds to keep users scrolling in an induced "flow state;"
"intermittent variable rewards" that manipulate dopamine delivery;
and mechanisms to reward extreme usage while producing harmful
social comparison. These defects, along with others discussed
throughout this complaint, cause Defendants' products to be
harmfully addictive, which in turn causes additional related
injuries.

Excessive screen time is especially harmful to adolescents' mental
health, sleep patterns, and emotional well-being. Yet, Defendants'
products lack any warnings (to users in general, minor users, or
their parents) that foreseeable product use can cause injury to
users' mental and physical health, rendering the products
unreasonably dangerous. Defendants' products contain designs
intended to circumvent parental oversight.

The Defendants know that minors are much more vulnerable to serious
psychological harm through social media use than adults.
Nevertheless, Defendants knowingly seek to grow the use of their
products by minors through designs, algorithms, and policies that
promote addiction, compulsive use, and other severe mental harm.
Rather than making meaningful changes to safeguard the health and
safety of its users, Defendants have consistently chosen to
prioritize profit over safety by continuing to implement product
designs that increase the frequency and duration of users'
engagement, resulting in the pernicious harms.

As a result, Plaintiff, as part of its mission as an educational
institution that shapes the minds of youth, provides mental health
services to its students. Plaintiff trains its teachers and staff
to screen students for mental health symptoms and provide or refer
them to services, such as those offered by school-based health
clinics operated in partnership with behavioral health agencies.
Plaintiff continues to hire mental health professionals to keep up
with the ever-growing need of its students, but there is no end in
sight. Plaintiff needs much more, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff Jefferson County School District R-1 ("Jefferson
County Schools") serves approximately 78,000 students.

The Defendants own and operate some of the largest social media
companies in the world.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Thomas P. Cartmell, Esq.
          Jonathan P. Kieffer, Esq.
          Austin Brane, Esq.
          WAGSTAFF & CARTMELL LLP
          4740 Grand Avenue, Suite 300
          Kansas City, MO 64112
          Phone: (816) 701-1100
          Email: tcartmell@wcllp.com
                 jpkieffer@wcllp.com
                 abrane@wcllp.com


MH CONSULTANTS: Plaintiffs Must File Class Cert. by Nov. 15, 2024
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as GEORGE MORRIS,
individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, v. MH CONSULTANTS, INC., d/b/a MANUFACTURED HOUSING
CONSULTANTS and CORELOGIC CREDCO, LLC, Case No. 3:23-cv-01741-K
(N.D. Tex.), the Hon. Judge Ed Kinkeade entered a class
certification scheduling order as follows:

   1. All motions requesting leave to join           April 18,
2024
      parties or to amend pleadings shall
      be filed by:

   2. The Plaintiffs shall file their Motion         Nov. 15, 2024
      for Class Certification by:

   3. Responses to the Motion for Class              Jan. 6, 2025
      Certification are due no later than:

   4. Replies is support of the Motion for           Feb. 4, 2025
      Class Certification are due no later
      than:

   5. Discovery related to Class Certification       Oct. 15, 2024
      ONLY, may begin immediately, but this
      discovery closes:

MH Consultants offers a complete range of mobile homes.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 9, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3sGKdNZ at no extra charge.[CC]

MIDFIRST BANK: Strother Privacy Suit Removed to W.D. Okla.
----------------------------------------------------------
The case styled ANDREW STROTHER, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. MIDFIRST BANK, Defendant,
Case No. CIV-23-995-F, was removed from the District Court of
Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma, to the United States District
Court for the Western District of Oklahoma on November 3, 2023.

The Clerk of Court for the Western District of Oklahoma assigned
Case No. 5:23-cv-00995-JD to the proceeding.

The Plaintiff alleges he was informed that between May 27-31, 2023,
"an unauthorized party was able to download files" from the MOVEit
platform, which was operated by a MidFirst IT vendor. He further
alleges that the incident "compromised" personally identifiable
information that included names, Social Security numbers, account
numbers, and "other sensitive information."

MidFirst Bank is a privately owned financial institution based in
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.[BN]

The Defendant is represented by:

          Timila S. Rother, Esq.
          William H. Hoch, Esq.
          Anthony Hendricks, Esq.
          CROWE & DUNLEVY, PC
          Braniff Building
          324 N. Robinson Ave., Suite 100
          Oklahoma City, OK 73102
          Telephone: (405) 235-7700
          Facsimile: (405) 239-6651
          E-mail: timila.rother@crowedunlevy.com
                  will.hoch@crowedunlevy.com
                  anthony.hendricks@crowedunlevy.com

               - and -

          Steven Jansma, Esq.
          NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP  
          111 W. Houston Street, Suite 1800
          San Antonio, TX 78205
          Telephone: (210) 270-9366
          E-mail: steven.jansma@nortonrosefulbright.com

               - and -

          Jason Fagelman, Esq.
          NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
          2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600
          Dallas, TX 75201
          Telephone: (214) 855-8120
          E-mail: jason.fagelman@nortonrosefulbright.com

               - and -

          Joseph Hughes, Esq.
          Sean M. Topping, Esq.
          NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP  
          1301 Avenue of the Americas
          New York, NY 10019
          Telephone: (212) 318-3363
          E-mail: joe.hughes@nortonrosefulbright.com
                  sean.topping@nortonrosefulbright.com

MIKKEL SVANE: Amethyst Arbitrage Files Suit in Del. Chancery Ct.
----------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Mikkel Svane, et al.
The case is styled as Amethyst Arbitrage International Master Fund,
Laborers' District Council and Contractors' Pension Fund Of Ohio,
Alexey Makarov, Matthew K. McGinnis, and Suzanne Rudy, and others
similarly situated v. MIKKEL SVANE, CARL BASS, JOHN GESCHKE,
SHELAGH GLASER, and NORMAN GENNARO, Case No. 2023-1139-JTL (Del.
Chancery Ct., Nov. 9, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Civil Action."

Mikkel Svane is the co-founder and former CEO of the software
company Zendesk.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ned Weinberger, Esq.
          Phone: (302) 573-2540
          Fax: (302) 573-2529

               - and -

          Kimberly A. Evans, Esq.
          BLOCK & LEVITON LLP
          260 Franklin Street, Suite 1860
          Boston, MA 02110
          Phone: (302) 499-3600
          Email: kim@blockleviton.com

               - and -

          Mark Richardson, Esq.
          Phone: (302) 573-2540
          Fax: (302) 573-2529


MILLENNIA TAX RELIEF: Costa Files TCPA Suit in C.D. California
--------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Millennia Tax Relief,
LLC. The case is styled as Dawn Costa, Individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated v. Millennia Tax Relief, LLC, Case
No. 2:23-cv-09232 (C.D. Cal., Nov. 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.

Millennia Tax Relief -- https://millenniataxrelief.com/ -- is a Tax
Firm of expert Tax Lawyers, Enrolled Agents, CPAs, and
Advisors.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ryan Lee McBride, Esq.
          KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP APC
          301 East Bethany Home Road Suite C-195
          Phoenix, AZ 85012
          Phone: (800) 400-6808
          Fax: (800) 520-5523
          Email: ryan@kazlg.com


MINDXPO INC: Sanchez Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Mindxpo, Inc. The
case is styled as Randy Sanchez, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Mindxpo, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-08348
(E.D.N.Y., Nov. 9, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Mindxpo, Inc. is an online retail store services featuring books,
music, videotapes, audiocassettes, compact discs, floppy discs,
VCD, DVD and more.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noor H. Abou-Saab, I, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF NOOR A. SAAB
          380 North Broadway, Suite 300
          Jericho, NY 11753
          Phone: (718) 740-5060
          Email: noorasaablaw@gmail.com


MINNIE ROSE LLC: Danso Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Minnie Rose, LLC. The
case is styled as Charity Danso, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated v. Minnie Rose, LLC, Case No.
1:23-cv-09904-LGS (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 9, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Minnie Rose -- https://minnierose.com/ -- is a lifestyle brand with
updated basics and trending styles for every season.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


MOLINA HEALTHCARE: Court Enters Class Cert Rulings in Kruzel Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Kruzel v. Molina
Healthcare, Inc., Case No. 6:23-cv-01183 (D. Or., Filed Aug. 14,
2023), the Hon. Judge Ann L. Aiken entered an order

-- Dispositive and Daubert motions are due 180 days after a ruling
on
    class certification.

-- Pretrial Order is due 270 days after a ruling on class
    certification.

The nature of suit states Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.

Molina is a managed care company.[CC]

MOREHOUSE COLLEGE: Violates Disabled's Civil Rights, Young Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
LESHAWN YOUNG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. MOREHOUSE COLLEGE, INC., Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-10110 (S.D.N.Y., November 16, 2023) is a class action
against the Defendant for violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

The nature of the suit is stated as 446 Civil Rights - American
with Disabilities - Other.

Morehouse College, Inc. is a private college in Atlanta, Georgia.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Michael A. LaBollita, Esq.
         GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
         150 E. 18th Street, Suite 10003
         New York, NY 10003
         Telephone: (212) 228-9795
         E-mail: michael@gottlieb.legal

MR. COOPER: Siegal Sues Over Failure to Secure and Safeguard PII
----------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Siegal, Steven Chojnicki, and Kevin Dowd, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. MR. COOPER GROUP INC.,
Case No. 3:23-cv-02485-S (N.D. Tex., Nov. 8, 2023), is brought for
its failure to properly secure and safeguard the personally
identifiable information that it collected and maintained as part
of its regular business practices, including, upon information and
belief, names, Social Security numbers, addresses, phone numbers,
dates of birth, zip code, and states of residence--information used
by Mr. Cooper for its business operations (collectively,
"personally identifiable information" or "PII").

Mr. Cooper customers are required to entrust Defendant with an
extensive amount of their PII, used for Defendant's business, in
order to obtain mortgage or loan services at Mr. Cooper. Defendant
retains this information for at least many years and even after the
relationship has ended.

By obtaining, collecting, using, and deriving a benefit from the
PIIof Plaintiffs and Class Members, Defendant assumed legal and
equitable duties to those individuals to protect and safeguard that
information from unauthorized access and intrusion. On October 31,
2023, Defendant "became the target of a cybersecurity incident."

The Defendant failed to adequately protect Plaintiffs' and Class
Members PII––and failed to even encrypt or redact this highly
sensitive information. This unencrypted, unredacted PII was
compromised due to Defendant's negligent and/or careless acts and
omissions and its utter failure to protect customers' sensitive
data. Hackers targeted and obtained Plaintiffs' and Class Members'
PII because of its value in exploiting and stealing the identities
of Plaintiffs and Class Members. The present and continuing risk to
victims of the Data Breach will remain for their respective
lifetimes.

The Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of all persons whose PII
was compromised as a result of Defendant's failure to: adequately
protect the PII of Plaintiffs and Class Members; warn Plaintiffs
and Class Members of Defendant's inadequate information security
practices; and effectively secure hardware containing protected PII
using reasonable and effective security procedures free of
vulnerabilities and incidents. Defendant's conduct amounts to
negligence, at a minimum, and violates federal and state statutes,
says the complaint.

The Plaintiffs' PII were obtained by the Defendant.

The Defendant is the 3rd largest mortgage and loan servicer in the
country, providing services to "4.3 million customers
nationwide."[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Joe Kendall, Esq.
          KENDALL LAW GROUP, PLLC - DALLAS
          3811 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1450
          Dallas, TX 75219
          Phone: (214) 744-3000
          Fax: (214) 744-3015
          Email: jkendall@kendalllawgroup.com

               - and -

          Gary M. Klinger, Esq.
          MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN LLC
          227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2100
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Phone: (866) 252-0878
          Email: gklinger@milberg.com


NEWBERRY COLLEGE: Bishop Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Newberry College
Partners, LLC. The case is styled as Cedric Bishop, on behalf of
himself and all other persons similarly situated v. Newberry
College Partners, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-09860 (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 7,
2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Newberry College -- https://www.newberry.edu/ -- is a small liberal
arts college with a beautiful 90-acre campus in Newberry, South
Carolina.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael A. LaBollita, Esq.
          GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
          150 E. 18 St., Suite PHR
          New York, NY 10003
          Phone: (212) 228-9795
          Fax: (212) 982-6284
          Email: michael@gottlieb.legal


NFL ENTERPRISES: Filing for Class Cert Bid Due August 19, 2024
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Louth v. NFL Enterprises
LLC, Case No. 1:21-cv-00405 (D.R.I., Filed Oct. 5, 2021), the Hon.
Judge Mary S. Mcelroy entered an order setting Scheduling Order
Deadlines:

  -- Factual Discovery to close by:               April 16, 2024

  -- The Plaintiff Expert Disclosures shall       May 6, 2024
     be made by:

  -- The Defendant Expert Disclosures shall       June 17, 2024
     be made by:

  -- Expert Discovery to close by:                July 19, 2024

  -- Dispositive Motions and Plaintiff's          Aug. 19, 2024
     Motion for Class Certification due by:

The suit alleges violation of the Stored Communications Act.

NFL was founded in 2003. The Company's line of business includes
operating and promoting professional and semiprofessional athletic
clubs and events. [CC]

NORTHERN TREE: Appeals Court Order in Lemus Labor Suit to 2nd Cir.
------------------------------------------------------------------
TODD PEZZEMENTI and NORTHERN TREE SERVICE are taking an appeal from
a court order entered in the lawsuit entitled Ramiro Lemus,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff, v. Todd Pezzementi, et al., Defendants, Case No.
7:15-cv-05592, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District
of New York.

As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter, the lawsuit
seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages and
statutory penalties, and attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the
Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law.

On September 29, 2023, Judge Nelson Stephen Roman adopted in its
entirety a Report and Recommendations entered by Magistrate Judge
Andrew E. Krause on June 16, 2023, recommending that Lemus be
awarded (1) overtime wages in the amount of $12,000; (2) unpaid
wages in the amount of $229.25; (3) liquidated damages in the
amount of $12,000; (4) pre-judgment interest on the total award of
NYLL damages (i.e., items (1) and (2)) of $12,229.25 from December
9, 2013 until the date of entry of judgment at the rate of 9
percent per annum; (5) damages for medical expenses in the amount
of $702.25; (6) damages for past pain and suffering in the amount
of $20,000; (7) pre-judgment interest on the award of damages for
past pain and suffering from from June 16, 2023 until the date of
entry of judgment at the rate of 9 percent per annum; (8) $1,100.05
in costs; (9) punitive damages in the amount of $10,000; and (10)
post-judgment interest in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1961.

The appellate case is captioned Lemus v. Pezzementi, Case No.
23-7639, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit, filed on November 3, 2023. [BN]

Plaintiff-Appellee RAMIRO LEMUS, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, is represented by:

            Michael Louis Braunstein, Esq.
            THE BRAUNSTEIN LAW FIRM, PLLC
            3 Eberling Drive
            New City, NY 10956

Defendants-Appellants TODD PEZZEMENTI, et al. appear pro se.

NORTHWELL HEALTH: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Hvidsten Alleges
----------------------------------------------------------------
JOHN HVIDSTEN; and SAVERIA GARCIA MACRI, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. NORTHWELL HEALTH,
INC., Defendant, Case No. 2:23-cv-08538-RPK-ARL (E.D.N.Y., Nov. 16,
2023) is an action against the Defendant for its failure to secure
and safeguard the personally identifying information and personal
health information of the Plaintiffs and the Class.

According to the Plaintiffs in the complaint, the Defendant owed a
duty to the Plaintiffs and Class members to implement and maintain
reasonable and adequate security measures to secure, protect, and
safeguard their PII/PHI against unauthorized access and disclosure.
The Defendant breached that duty by, among other things, failing to
ensure that its vendor implemented and maintained reasonable
security procedures and practices to protect the Defendant's
patients' PII/PHI from unauthorized access and disclosure.

As a result of the Defendant's inadequate security measures and
breach of its duties and obligations, the Data Breach occurred, and
the Plaintiffs' and Class members' PII/PHI was accessed and
disclosed, says the suit.

NORTHWELL HEALTH, INC. operates as a non-profit organization. The
Organization offers rehabilitation and nursing facilities,
ambulatory and urgent care centers, hospice care networks, and home
health services. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Adam Pollock, Esq.
          POLLOCK COHEN LLP
          111 Broadway, Suite 1804
          New York, NY 10006
          Telephone: (212) 337-5361
          Email: adam@pollockcohen.com

               - and -

          Ben Barnow, Esq.
          Anthony L. Parkhill, Esq.
          BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          205 West Randolph Street, Suite 1630
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Telephone: (312) 621-2000
          Email: b.barnow@barnowlaw.com
                 aparkhill@barnowlaw.com

               - and -

          Gary M. Klinger, Esq.
          MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON
          PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC
          227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2100
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Telephone: (866) 252-0878
          Email: gklinger@milberg.com

NOVAVAX INC: Opposes Sinnathurai Class Certification Bid
--------------------------------------------------------
Novavax Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending September 30, 2023 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 9, 2023, that the Company, on
September 22, 2023 filed its opposition to plaintiffs' class
certification motion and class counsel and representatives.

On November 12, 2021, Sothinathan Sinnathurai filed a purported
securities class action in the U.S. District Court for the District
of Maryland (the "Maryland Court") against the Company and certain
members of senior management, captioned Sothinathan Sinnathurai v.
Novavax, Inc., et al., No. 8:21-cv-02910-TDC (the "Sinnathurai
Action").

On January 26, 2022, the Maryland Court entered an order
designating David Truong, Nuggehalli Balmukund Nandkumar, and
Jeffrey Gabbert as co-lead plaintiffs in the Sinnathurai Action.

The co-lead plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on
March 11, 2022, alleging that the defendants made certain
purportedly false and misleading statements concerning the
Company's ability to manufacture prototype vaccine on a commercial
scale and to secure the prototype vaccine's regulatory approval.

The amended complaint defines the purported class as those
stockholders who purchased the Company's securities between
February 24, 2021 and October 19, 2021.

On April 25, 2022, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the
consolidated amended complaint.

On December 12, 2022, the Maryland Court issued a ruling granting
in part and denying in part defendants' motion to dismiss.

The Maryland Court dismissed all claims against two individual
defendants and claims based on certain public statements challenged
in the consolidated amended complaint.

The Maryland Court denied the motion to dismiss as to the remaining
claims and defendants, and directed the Company and other remaining
defendants to answer within fourteen days.

On December 27, 2022, the Company filed its answer and affirmative
defenses.

On March 16, 2023, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class
certification and to appoint class representatives and counsel.

The Company filed its opposition to the plaintiffs' motion on
September 22, 2023.

Novavax, Inc. is a biotechnology company into the discovery,
development, and commercialization of vaccines. It currently has
one commercial program, for vaccines to prevent COVID (Novavax
COVID Vaccine, Adjuvanted), which it markets under the brand name
"Nuvaxovid(TM)" and has partnered with Serum Institute of India
Pvt. Ltd. (SIIPL) and markets NVX-CoV2373 as "Covovax(TM)."








OKAYPLAYER LLC: Tucker Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Okayplayer, LLC. The
case is styled as Henry Tucker, on behalf of himself and all other
persons similarly situated v. Okayplayer, LLC, Case No.
1:23-cv-09695 (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 3, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Okayplayer -- https://www.okayplayer.com/ -- is an online platform
that offers information and content on original, progressive urban
music..[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dana Lauren Gottlieb, Esq.
          GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
          150 E. 18th St., Suite PHR
          New York, NY 10003
          Phone: (212) 228-9795
          Fax: (212) 982-6284
          Email: danalgottlieb@aol.com


OLD DOMINION: Rodriguez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Old Dominion Freight
Line, Inc. The case is styled as Valentina Rodriguez, on behalf of
similarly situated aggrieved employees v. Old Dominion Freight
Line, Inc., Jeffrey Delbort, Case No. BCV-23-103666 (Cal. Super.
Ct., Kern Cty., Nov. 1, 2023).

The case type is stated "Wrongful Termination - Civil Unlimited."

Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. -- https://www.odfl.com/ -- is an
American regional, inter-regional and national less than truckload
shipping company.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jonathan P. Lacour, Esq.
          EMPLOYEES FIRST LABOR LAW
          1 S. Fair Oaks Ave. Ste. 200
          Pasadena, CA 91105-1945


OLIN CORP: Davis Suit Seeks to Certify Rule 23 Class Action
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ROBERT DAVIS, ET AL., v.
OLIN CORP., ET AL., Case No. 3:22-cv-00374-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La.), the
Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order:

-- Certifying case a class action with bifurcated proceedings;
and

-- Appointing class counsel and class representatives.

Olin is an American manufacturer of ammunition, chlorine, and
sodium hydroxide.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated Nov. 8, 2023 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/47BDrbf at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Roy Bergeron, Jr., Esq.
          Eulis Simien, Jr., Esq.
          Jimmy Simien, Esq.
          SIMIEN & SIMIEN, L.L.C.
          7908 Wrenwood Boulevard
          Baton Rouge, LA 70809
          Telephone: (225) 932-9221
          Facsimile: (225) 932-9286
          E-mail: eulissimien@simien.com
                  jimmysimien@simien.com
                  roybergeron@simien.com

                - and -

          Patrick W. Pendley, Esq.
          PENDLEY, BAUDIN & COFFIN, L.L.P.
          24110 Eden Street
          Post Office Drawer 71
          Plaquemine, LA 70764-0071
          Telephone: (225) 687-6396
          Facsimile: (225) 687-6398
          E-mail: pwpendley@pbclawfirm.com

OLIN CORP: Faces Caustic Soda-Related Suit in Quebec
----------------------------------------------------
Olin Corporation disclosed in its Form 10-Q report for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2023, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in October 27, 2023, that Olin,
K.A. Steel Chemical, Olin Canada ULC, 3229897 Nova Scotia Co.
(wholly owned subsidiaries of Olin Corp.) and other alleged caustic
soda producers were named as defendants in a proposed class action
civil lawsuit filed on October 7, 2020 in the Quebec Superior court
(Province of Quebec) on behalf of the respective named plaintiff
and a putative class comprised of all Canadian persons and entities
who, between October 1, 2015 and the date of the eventual class
action certification, directly or indirectly purchased caustic soda
or products containing caustic soda, produced by one or more of the
defendants.

Olin, K.A. Steel Chemical, Olin Canada ULC, 3229897 Nova Scotia Co.
and other alleged caustic soda producers were also named as
defendants in a proposed class action civil lawsuit filed November
13, 2020 in the Federal court of Canada on behalf of the respective
named plaintiff and a putative class comprised of all legal persons
in Canada who, at any time on or after October 1, 2015 to the
present, directly or indirectly purchased caustic soda.

The other defendants named in the two Canadian lawsuits are
Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Occidental Chemical Corporation,
Oxy Canada Sales, Inc., Westlake Chemical Corporation, Axiall
Canada, Inc., Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., Shintech Incorporated,
Formosa Plastics Corporation, and Formosa Plastics Corporation,
U.S.A.

The lawsuits allege the defendants conspired to fix, raise,
maintain control, and stabilize the price of caustic soda, divide
and allocate markets, sales, customers and territories, fix,
maintain, control, prevent, restrict, lessen or eliminate
production and supply of caustic soda, and agree to idle capacity
of production and/or refrain from increasing their production
capacity. Plaintiffs seek damages, including punitive damages.

Olin Corporation is a Virginia corporation, incorporated in 1892,
having its principal executive offices in Clayton, MO. It is a
vertically-integrated global manufacturer and distributor of
chemical products and a leading U.S. manufacturer of ammunition.


ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL: Continues to Defend Alleman Class Suit
----------------------------------------------------------
Orrstown Financial Services Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report
for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2023 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2023, that the
Company continues to defend itself from the Alleman class suit.

On March 25, 2022, a customer of the Bank filed a putative class
action complaint against the Bank in the Court of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, in a case captioned Alleman, on
behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Orrstown
Bank.

The complaint alleges, among other things, that the Bank breached
its account agreements by charging certain overdraft fees.

The complaint seeks a refund of all allegedly improper fees,
damages in an amount to be proven at trial, attorneys' fees and
costs, and an injunction against the Bank's allegedly improper
overdraft practices.

This lawsuit is similar to lawsuits recently filed against other
financial institutions pertaining to overdraft fee disclosures.

The Bank intends to vigorously defend itself against the claims
brought by plaintiff in this matter.

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. is a financial holding company
that operates Orrstown Bank, a commercial bank providing banking
and financial advisory services in Berks, Cumberland, Dauphin,
Franklin, Lancaster, Perry and York Counties, Pennsylvania, and in
Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Howard and Washington Counties, Maryland.
It operates in the community banking segment and engages in
lending
activities, including commercial, residential, commercial
mortgages, construction, municipal, and various forms of consumer
lending, and deposit services, including checking, savings, time,
and money market deposits.


P.A.M. TRANSPORTATION: Settles Truckers' Labor Suit
---------------------------------------------------
P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q
report for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2023, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 2023,
that a final settlement approval hearing was held, and the
settlement was approved, on October 11, 2023 by the United States
District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.

The company was named a defendant in said putative class action
lawsuit filed on August 6, 2021. The complaint alleged failure to
pay over-the-road drivers minimum wage under the Fair Labor
Standards Act and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, violations of the
Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA), violations of the Arkansas
Wage Payment Law (discharge pay and unlawful, usurious advance
fees), violations of the Arkansas Common Law, and violations of the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

On August 5, 2022, the parties filed a Joint Motion for Preliminary
Approval of a Collective and Class Action Settlement. On October 7,
2022, the parties submitted to the court an executed Settlement
Agreement and Release, to resolve and release all claims asserted
in the litigation from January 1, 2020, through July 31, 2022, for
$4,750,000. The District Court granted preliminary approval of the
settlement on November 14, 2022. Notice of the settlement has been
sent to class and collective action members.

P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. is a holding company that owns
subsidiaries engaged in providing truckload dry van carrier
services transporting general commodities throughout the
continental United States, as well as in the Canadian provinces of
Ontario and Quebec.


PAC 12 CONFERENCE: Griggs Suit Moved From C.D. Cal. to N.D. Ill.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled JEANNIE GRIGGS, et al., individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated v. PAC 12 CONFERENCE, et al., Case
No. 2:23-cv-06926, was transferred from the U.S. District Court for
the Central District of California to the U.S. District Court for
the Northern District of Illinois on November 16, 2023.

The Clerk of Court for the Northern District of Illinois assigned
Case No. 1:23-cv-15673 to the proceeding.

The Plaintiffs, as heirs of Mark Gustafson, bring this complaint on
behalf of Mark Gustafson and a Class of former players who suffered
and/or continue to suffer from neurological and cognitive injuries,
including Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, as a result of the
Defendants' actions or omissions.

Pac-12 Conference is an unincorporated association with its
principal place of business located at 360 3rd Street, 3rd Floor,
San Francisco, California.

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is an
unincorporated association with its principal place of business
located at 700 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                                 
                                    
         
         Todd Michael Logan, Esq.
         EDELSON PC
         150 California Street 18th Floor
         San Francisco, CA 94111
         Telephone: (415) 638-9660
         Facsimile: (415) 373-9435
         E-mail: tlogan@edelson.com

                 - and -

         D'Arcy L.R. Rapp, Esq.
         SHRADER & ASSOCIATES, LLP
         3 Professional Park Drive, Ste. A
         Maryville, IL 62062
         Telephone: (346) 409-2995
         Facsimile: (713) 571-9605
         E-mail: darcy@shraderlaw.com

                 - and -

         James B. Hartle, Esq.
         Nicholas A. Fernelius, Esq.
         9 Greenway Plaza, Ste. 2300
         Houston, TX 77046
         Telephone: (713) 782-0000
         E-mail: jim@shraderlaw.com
                 nick@shraderlaw.com

                 - and -

         Michael C. Eyerly, Esq.
         Patrick A. DeBlase, Esq.
         DEBLASE BROWN EYERLY LLP
         680 South Santa Fe Avenue
         Los Angeles, CA 90021
         Telephone: (310) 575-9955
         Facsimile: (310) 575-9919
         E-mail: eyerly@dbelegal.com
                 deblase@dbelegal.com

PETER THOMAS ROTH: Reyes Suit Removed to C.D. California
--------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Bonnie Reyes, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. PETER THOMAS ROTH LABS LLC., a New
York limited liability company, Case No. 23STCV23090 was removed
from the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, to
the United States District Court for the Central District of
California on Nov. 8, 2023, and assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-09463.

The Plaintiff's Complaint asserts one cause of action against
Defendant for Violation of California Consumers Legal Remedies Act,
Civil Code (Although the Complaint references California Unfair
Competition Law, Business and Professions Code, and False and
Misleading Advertising in Violation of Business and Professions
Code, no such claims are asserted under these statutes in the
Complaint).[BN]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Arameh Zargham O'Boyle, Esq.
          Paige E. Adaskaveg, Esq.
          MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
          2049 Century Park East, Suite 300
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Phone: 310-586-3200
          Facsimile: 310-586-3202
          Email: azoboyle@mintz.com
                 pdaskaveg@mintz.com

               - and -

          Brad M. Scheller, Esq.
          MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
          919 Third Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Phone: 212-935-3000
          Facsimile: 212-983-3115
          Email: bmscheller@mintz.com


PETSMART LLC: Merino Sues Over Unpaid Minimum and Overtime Wages
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gabriela Merino, individually, and on behalf of all other aggrieved
employees v. PETSMART, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company;
and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Case No. 23STCV57593 (Cal. Super. Ct.,
Los Angeles Cty., Nov. 9, 2023), is brought under the Private
Attorneys General Act of 2004 ("PAGA") to recover civil penalties
and address an employer's violations of the California Labor Code
which resulted in the Defednants failure to pay minimum and
overtime wages.

In this case, Defendants violated various provisions of the
California Labor Code. The Defendants implemented policies and
practices which led to unpaid wages resulting from Defendant's:
failure to accurately pay overtime wages, failure to pay minimum
wages failure to provide meal periods before the end of the fifth
hour worked and failure to pay an additional hour's of pay in lieu
of providing a meal period before the end of the fifth hour worked;
failure to authorize and permit rest breaks for every four hours or
major fraction thereof worked and failure to pay an additional
hour's of pay in lieu of providing a rest period; failing to pay
all wages earned and owed upon separation from Defendant's employ;
and failing to provide accurate itemized wage statements; knowingly
and intentionally failing to maintain accurate and complete
records; and failure to indemnify for necessary business expenses.
As a result, Plaintiff seeks penalties under Labor Code, says the
complaint.

The Plaintiff was employed as dog groomer at the Defendant's
Northridge location.

The Defendant sells pet products, services, and small pets
throughout the United States, including in Los Angeles County, and
employs numerous non-exempt employees in the State of
California.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ronald W. Makarem, Esq.
          Samuel Almon, Esq.
          Daniel J. Bass, Esq.
          MAKAREM & ASSOCIATES APLC
          11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2440
          Los Angeles, CA 90025-1760
          Phone: (310) 312-0299
          Fax: (310) 312-0296

               - and -

          Matthew Mann, Esq.
          Justin R. Rogal, Esq.
          MANN ROGAL APC
          16501 Ventura Blvd., Suite 400
          Encino, CA 91436
          Phone: (310) 620-2314
          Fax: (310) 620-231


PHILADELPHIA, PA: Must File Class Cert Bid Response by Dec. 18
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARYBELLE FAYAD, v. CITY
OF PHILADELPHIA, Case No. 2:23-cv-00032-JDW (E.D. Pa.), the Hon.
Judge Joshua D. Wolson entered an order that Defendant shall file
its response to Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification on or
before December 18, 2023.

Philadelphia is the largest city in Pennsylvania and ranks sixth in
population among cities in the United States.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 9, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3QLESgi at no extra charge.[CC]

PORT AUTHORITY: Class Cert Fact Discovery Due Jan. 31, 2024
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JACOB MEINERT, as Class
Representative individually and on behalf of those Plaintiffs who
submitted a religious exemption and were fired, and NICHOLAS
SCHALLUS, as Class Representative individually and on behalf of
those Plaintiffs who submitted a medical exemption and were fired,
v. PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY d/b/a Pittsburgh Regional
Transit, Case No. 2:22-cv-01736-RJC (W.D. Pa.), the Hon. Judge
Robert J. Colville entered a case management order:

-- The Meinert action is placed under Local Rule 16.1 for pretrial

    proceedings and all provisions of the Rule will be strictly
    enforced. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1, the parties are directed
as
    follows:

     1. The parties do not anticipate the addition of new parties.

     2. The parties shall move to amend the pleadings by January
31,
        2024.

     3. The parties shall complete class certification fact
discovery
        by January 31, 2024. All interrogatories, depositions and
        requests for admissions and/or production of documents
shall
        be served within sufficient time to allow responses to be
        completed prior to the close of fact discovery.

     4. The parties do not anticipate filing expert reports in
        connection with the class certification motion.

     5. The parties shall complete the ADR process they selected by

        January 8, 2024. Discovery is not stayed pending ADR.


     6. The Plaintiffs shall file their Motion for Class
Certification
        by February 28, 2024. The Defendant shall file its response
to
        Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification by March 21,
2024.
        The Plaintiffs' shall file their reply by April 5, 2024.

Port Authority provides bus and light rail service in Allegheny
County.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 9, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3QZNwcm at no extra charge.[CC]

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY: Pearson Files FDCPA Suit in E.D. Pennsylvania
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Portfolio Recovery
Associates, LLC. The case is styled as Linea Pearson, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated v. Portfolio Recovery
Associates, LLC, Case No. 2:23-cv-04337 (E.D. Pa., Nov. 7, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (PRA Group, Inc.) --
https://www.portfoliorecovery.com/ -- is a publicly traded global
debt buyer based in Norfolk, Virginia.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ari H. Marcus, Esq.
          MARCUS & ZELMAN LLC
          701 Cookman Avenue, Suite 300
          Asbury Park, NJ 07712
          Phone: (732) 695-3282
          Fax: (732) 298-6256
          Email: ari@marcuszelman.com


POSTMEDS INC: Rossi Files Suit in N.D. California
-------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against PostMeds, Inc. The
case is styled as John Rossi, Michael Thomas, Marissa Porter, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. PostMeds,
Inc. doing business as: TRUEPILL, Case No. 3:23-cv-05732 (N.D.
Cal., Nov. 7, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Other Personal Property.

PostMeds, Inc., doing business as TruePill --
https://www.truepill.com/ -- provides online pharmacy delivery
services.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Kyle Douglas McLean, Esq.
          SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP
          700 S. Flower Street, Suite 1000
          Los Angeles, CA 90017
          Phone: (213) 376-3739
          Email: kmclean@sirillp.com


PROGRESS SOFTWARE: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Glass Alleges
--------------------------------------------------------------
KERRI GLASS; CORINA LOWREY; and ALDREAMER SMITH, individually and
on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. PROGRESS
SOFTWARE CORPORATION, Defendant, Case No. 1:23-cv-12790-ADB (D.
Mass., Nov. 16, 2023) is an action arising out of the targeted
cyberattack and data breach on the Defendant's network that
resulted in unauthorized access to highly sensitive patient and
employee data.

The Plaintiffs allege in the complaint that the Defendant failed to
secure and safeguard the data of the Plaintiff and the Class,
including their personally identifiable information ("PII" or
"Private Information"). As a result of the breach, unauthorized
third-party cybercriminals gained access to and obtained
Plaintiffs' and Class members' PII, says the suit.

PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION develops, markets, and distributes
applications. The Company offers databases, application, messaging
servers, and development tools. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Richard E. Levine, Esq.
          STANZLER LEVINE, LLC
          37 Walnut Street, Suite 200
          Wellesley, MA 02481
          Telephone: (617) 482-3198
          Email: rlevine@stanzlerlevine.com

               - and -

          Nicholas A. Migliaccio, Esq.
          Jason S. Rathod, Esq.
          MIGLIACCIO & RATHOD, LLP
          412 H Street, NE, Suite 302
          Washington, DC 20002
          Telephone: (202) 470-520
          Facsimile: (202) 800-2730
          Email: mailto:nmigliaccio@classlawdc.com
                 jrathod@classlawdc.com

PROGRESSIVE LEASING: Alexander Files Suit in D. Utah
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Progressive Leasing.
The case is styled as Marty Alexander, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated v. Progressive Leasing, Case No.
2:23-cv-00823-TC (D. Utah, Nov. 9, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury.

Progressive Leasing -- https://progleasing.com/ -- provides a
rental-or lease- purchase agreement or in certain states, a
rent-to-own agreement, a consumer rental-purchase agreement, or a
lease agreement with an option to purchase.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          William B. Federman, Esq.
          FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD
          10205 N. Pennsylvania Ave.
          Oklahoma City, OK 73120
          Phone: (405) 235-1560
          Email: wbf@federmanlaw.com

               - and -

          Charles H. Thronson, Esq.
          PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER
          201 S. Main St., Ste. 1800
          PO BOX 45898
          Salt Lake City, UT 84145-0898
          Phone: (801) 532-1234
          Email: ecf@parsonsbehle.com


PROSUPPS USA: Scheibe Appeals Judgment in Mislabeling Class Action
------------------------------------------------------------------
JACOB SCHEIBE is taking an appeal from a court judgment in the
lawsuit entitled Jacob Scheibe, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ProSupps USA, LLC,
Defendant, Case No. 3:22-cv-01784-BEN-MSB, in the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of California.

As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter, the Plaintiff
alleges that the Defendant manufactured, packaged, labeled,
advertised, distributed, and sold dietary supplement products that
are misbranded and falsely advertised in violation of the
California Business & Professions Code and the Consumer Legal
Remedies Act.

On Mar. 6, 2023, the Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which
the Defendant moved to dismiss on Mar. 20, 2023.

On May 18, 2023, Judge Roger T. Benitez granted the Defendant's
motion to dismiss without prejudice. The Court agreed with the
Defendant's argument that the Plaintiff's state law claims are
preempted because the Plaintiff did not plead that he followed the
protocol mandated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in
testing product.

On Nov. 3, 2023, the Court entered judgment signed by Judge
Benitez.

The appellate case is captioned Scheibe v. ProSupps USA, LLC, Case
No. 23-3300, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit, filed on November 3, 2023.

The briefing schedule in the Appellate Case states that:

   -- Appellant Jacob Scheibe Mediation Questionnaire was due on
November 8, 2023;

   -- Appellant Jacob Scheibe Appeal Opening Brief is due on
December 13, 2023; and

   -- Appellee ProSupps USA, LLC Appeal Answering Brief is due on
January 12, 2024. [BN]

Plaintiff-Appellant JACOB SCHEIBE, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated, is represented by:

            Charles C. Weller, Esq.
            CHARLES C. WELLER, APC
            11412 Corley Court
            San Diego, CA 92126
            Telephone: (858) 414-7465

Defendant-Appellee PROSUPPS USA, LLC is represented by:

            Jaikaran Singh, Esq.
            FOLEY & LARDNER, LLP
            11988 El Camino Real, Suite 400
            San Diego, CA 92130
            Telephone: (858) 847-6700

QUALCOMM INC: N.D. Cal. Dismisses Securities Suit
-------------------------------------------------
Qualcomm Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 3, 2023, that on October 5, 2023, the United
States District Courts for the Northern District of California
granted the company's motion, dismissed the complaint and entered
final judgment in Qualcomm's favor.

On January 23, 2017 and January 26, 2017, securities class action
complaints were filed by purported stockholders in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of California
against the company and certain of its then current and former
officers and directors. The complaints alleged, among other things,
that we violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, by
making false and misleading statements and omissions of material
fact in connection with certain allegations that we are or were
engaged in anticompetitive conduct. The complaints sought
unspecified damages, interest, fees and costs.

On May 4, 2017, the court consolidated the two actions, and on July
3, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint
asserting the same basic theories of liability and requesting the
same basic relief. On May 23, 2022, the plaintiffs filed a motion
for class certification, and on March 20, 2023, the court issued an
order granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion
for class certification. The order denied class certification on
the basis of alleged misrepresentations relating to our chip-level
licensing practices, but certified a class on the basis of alleged
misrepresentations relating to the separate operations of its
Qualcomm CDMA Technologies and Qualcomm Technology Licensing.

on April 3, 2023, the company filed a petition with the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seeking permission to
appeal the district court's class certification order, which the
Ninth Circuit denied.

On September 29, 2021, the Ninth Circuit vacated the class
certification order, ruling that the district court had failed to
correctly assess the propriety of applying California law to a
nationwide class, and remanded the case to the district court. On
June 10, 2022, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, limiting
the proposed class to California residents rather than a nationwide
class. The company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint,
and on January 6, 2023, the court issued an order granting in part
and denying in part our motion to dismiss.

Qualcomm Incorporated is an American multinational corporation
headquartered in San Diego, California, and incorporated in
Delaware. It creates semiconductors, software, and services related
to wireless technology. It owns patents critical to the 5G, 4G,
CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA and WCDMA mobile communications standard.


QUASI CORPORATION: Sinkfield Suit Moved From M.D. Pa. to D. Minn.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled DEON SINKFIELD, JR., individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. THE QUASI CORPORATION OF AMERICA,
ETC, Case No. 1:23-cv-01883, was transferred from the U.S. District
Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to the U.S. District
Court for the District of Minnesota on November 16, 2023.

The Clerk of Court for the District of Minnesota assigned Case No.
0:23-cv-03551-ADM-DJF to the proceeding.

The nature of the suit is stated as 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil
Rights. [BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.

RENTGROW INC: Faces Jones Suit Over Consumer Credit Complaints
--------------------------------------------------------------
MARK JONES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. RENTGROW, INC., Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-05263-AT-RGV (N.D. Ga., November 16, 2023) is a class
action against the Defendant for violation of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act.

The nature of the suit is stated as 480 Other Statutes - Consumer
Credit.

RentGrow, Inc. is a credit reporting agency in Waltham,
Massachusetts. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Andrew Weiner, Esq.
         Jeffrey Sand, Esq.
         WEINER & SAND LLC
         800 Battery Avenue SE, Suite 100
         Atlanta, GA 30339
         Telephone: (404) 254-0842
                    (404) 205-5029
         E-mail: aw@wsjustice.com
                 js@wsjustice.com

RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES: Mediation in Tredo Suit Ongoing
-----------------------------------------------------
Resideo Technologies, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 1, 2023, that on June 28, 2023,
Lisset Tredo, a company employee, filed a putative class action
complaint in the San Diego County Superior court on behalf of all
non-exempt employees in California, in which she alleges violations
by the company of the California Labor Code related to sick leave
pay, accurate wage statements, recordkeeping, and pay timing, and
on August 28, 2023 she filed a first amended complaint adding a
claim under the California Private Attorneys General Act.

She seeks alleged unpaid wages, restitution, interest, statutory
penalties, attorneys' fees and costs in an unknown amount. The
company answered the Tredo lawsuit in which it asserted a general
denial of plaintiff's allegations and asserted various defenses.

The parties have agreed to attend mediation in January 2024 and to
stay formal discovery pending the outcome of the mediation.

Resideo Technologies, Inc. is a manufacturer and developer of
technology-driven smoke and carbon monoxide detection home safety
products and security solutions. It is also a wholesale distributor
of low-voltage security products including access control, fire
detection, fire suppression, security, and video products.


ROBINHOOD FINANCIAL: Plaintiffs' Class Cert Bid Nixed w/o Prejudice
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading
Litigation, Case No. 1:21-md-02989-CMA (S.D. Fla.), the Hon. Judge
Cecilia M. Altonaga entered an order that Plaintiffs' motion for
class certification is denied without prejudice.

-- The Defendants' motion to exclude opinion of Adam Werner is
denied
    as moot.

-- Although Plaintiffs demonstrate compliance with each of Rule
    23(a)'s requirements, they have failed to show that common
issues
    predominate because they have not offered a method of proving
    reliance class wide or otherwise assured the Court that
    individualized issues of reliance will not predominate.

-- The Court thus declines to reach the parties' arguments on
damages
    or Rule 23(b)(3)'s superiority requirement.

-- Because the Court did not rely on the challenged expert
testimony
    in reaching its determination, the Court also does not engage
in a
    Daubert analysis.

The case involves allegations of market manipulation by Robinhood
arising from its transaction restrictions in early 2021 following
the "meme stock" short squeeze. Specifically, in January 2021,
market volatility prompted regulators to raise deposit requirements
for clearing brokers, including Robinhood, to ensure they could
cover the costs of unexecuted trades.

Robinhood could not afford the new deposit requirements and sought
another way to appease regulators. It succeeded after regulators
agreed to waive the deposit requirements -- so long as Robinhood
restricted its customers’ access to certain stocks.

The Plaintiffs now seek to certify the following class:

   "All persons or entities who held common stock in AMC
Entertainment
   Holdings, Inc. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., BlackBerry Ltd., Express

   Inc., GameStop Corp., Koss Corp., Tootsie Roll Industries Inc.or

   American Depositary Shares of foreign-issuers Nokia Corp. and
   trivago N.V. as of the close of trading on January 27, 2021, and

   sold any such shares between January 28, 2021, and February 4,
   2021.

   Excluded from the class are those who suffered no damages,
   Defendants, the officers and directors of Defendants, members of

   their immediate families and their legal representatives, heirs,

   successors or assigns and any entity in which Defendants or any

   excluded persons have or had a controlling interest.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to appoint as class
representatives Abraham Huacuja, Ava Bernard, Blue Laine-Beveridge,
Brendan Clarke, Brian Harbison, Cecilia Rivas, Doi Nguyen, Joseph
Gurney, Marcel Poirier, Sandy Ng, Santiago Gil Bohorquez, and
Thomas Cash; and as class counsel, The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/40MGTNZ at no extra charge.[CC]

RTX CORP: Plaintiffs Seek to Seal Class Certification Brief
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as TARAH KYE BOROZNY, et al.,
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. RTX
CORPORATION, PRATT & WHITNEY DIVISION, et al., Case No.
3:21-cv-01657-SVN (D. Conn.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter
an order sealing:

    (1) Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and appointment
of
        class counsel (the Class Certification Brief); and

    (2) certain exhibits appended to the Declaration of Daniel F.
Loud
        in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification
and
        Appointment of Class Counsel (the Declaration).

Specifically, Plaintiffs seek an order sealing the following
Exhibits to the Declaration:

   Exhibit        Designation                 Designating Party
    1         Expert report; see              See discussion below

               discussion below

    3         Confidential- Attorney's        QuEST
              Eyes Only

    12        Confidential                    Pratt & Whitney;
Belcan

    17        Confidential                    PSI  
RTX is an American multinational aerospace and defense
conglomerate.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3G9e9Wi at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Daniel L. Brockett, Esq.
          Manisha M. Sheth, Esq.
          Steig D. Olson, Esq.
          Thomas Lepri, Esq.
          Daniel F. Loud, Esq.
          Justin Reinheimer, Esq.
          QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &  SULLIVAN, LLP
          51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
          New York, NY 10010
          Telephone: (212) 849-7000
          E-mail: danbrockett@quinnemanuel.com
                  manishasheth@quinnemanuel.com
                  steigolson@quinnemanuel.com
                  thomaslepri@quinnemanuel.com
                  danielloud@quinnemanuel.com
                  justinreinheimer@quinnemanuel.com

                - and -

          Gregory S. Asciolla, Esq.
          Robin A. van der Meulen, Esq.
          Matthew J. Perez, Esq.
          Johnny M. Shaw, Esq.
          DICELLO LEVITT LLP
          485 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1001
          New York, NY 10017
          Telephone: (646) 933-1000
          E-mail: gasciolla@dicellolevitt.com
                  rvandermeulen@dicellolevitt.com
                  mperez@dicellolevitt.com
                  jshaw@dicellolevitt.com

                - and -

          Joseph D. Garrison, Esq.
          Stephen J. Fitzgerald, Esq.
          Joshua R. Goodbaum, Esq.
          Amanda M. DeMatteis, Esq.
          GARRISON, LEVIN-EPSTEIN, FITZGERALD & PIRROTTI, P.C.
          405 Orange Street
          New Haven, CT 06511
          Telephone: (203) 777-4425
          E-mail: jgarrison@garrisonlaw.com
                  sfitzgerald@garrisonlaw.com
                  jgoodbaum@garrisonlaw.com
                  adematteis@garrisonlaw.com

                - and -

          David A. Slossberg, Esq.
          Erica Oates Nolan, Esq.
          Timothy C. Cowan, Esq.
          HURWITZ SAGARIN SLOSSBERG & KNUFF, LLC
          135 Broad Street
          Milford, CT 06460
          Telephone: (203) 877-8000
          E-mail: DSlossberg@hssklaw.com
                  ENolan@hssklaw.com
                  TCowan@hssklaw.com

RTX CORPORATION: Plaintiffs File Bid for Class Certification
------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as TARAH KYE BOROZNY, et al.,
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. RTX
CORPORATION, PRATT & WHITNEY DIVISION, et al., Case No.
3:21-cv-01657-SVN (D. Conn.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter
an order granting their motion for class certification and
appointment of class counsel.

RTX is an American multinational aerospace and defense
conglomerate.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3sFIFnw at no extra
charge.[CC]

SOUTH CENTRAL: Kevin Garlington Sues Over Breach of Contract
------------------------------------------------------------
KEVIN GARLINGTON FOR SERENITY INCLUSIVE FAMILY SERVICES LLC,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES REGIONAL CENTER FOR PERSONS
WITH DEV DISABILITIES, INC., Defendant, Case No. 23STCV28178 (Cal.
Super., Los Angeles Cty., Nov. 16, 2023) is an action against the
Defendant for breach of contract, negligence, intentional tort, and
fraud.

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant willfully
participated in an unapproved, illegal, contract-breaching transfer
of all revenue and consumers services from Serenity Inclusive
Family Services LLC to another organization, without any notice to
the Plaintiff of any changes, proposed changes, transfers, proposed
transfers, or any other type of request.

The Defendant maintains a culture and environment of
non-transparency and biased behaviors about and toward how they
carry out vendorization, the process of contracting a service to a
vendor, billing for services, and assuring a certain quality of
service is being rendered to the consumers. The Defendant regularly
falsely certifies they met with clients and vendors about services
and quality assurance, says the suit.

SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES REGIONAL CENTER FOR PERSONS WITH DEV
DISABILITIES, INC. is a private, non-profit organization that is a
comprehensive resource for evaluation, diagnosis, treatment,
advocacy and support for people diagnosed with developmental
disabilities. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented pro se.

STANDARD INSURANCE: Gaffin Sues Over Data Breach on MOVEit Software
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DAVID GAFFIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY and PENSION
BENEFIT INFORMATION, LLC, Defendants, Case No. 4:23-cv-40158 (D.
Mass., November 13, 2023) seeks to redress the harms caused by
Defendants' massive and preventable data breach perpetrated by
well-known cybergang, Cl0p, beginning on or around May 31, 2023 and
for negligence, breach of implied contract, breach implied covenant
of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, invasion of
privacy, and breach of confidentiality.  

During the data breach, Clop infiltrated the inadequately protected
MOVEit software Defendants negligently used and stole the highly
sensitive and confidential personally identifiable information of
Plaintiff and other similarly situated individuals. Due to
Defendants' failure to utilize software with adequate data security
measures in place, Plaintiff and the Class face a lifetime risk of
fraud and identity theft, says the suit.

Headquartered in Portland, OR, Standard Insurance Company provides
group disability, statutory disability, life, dental, vision,
critical illness, accident, hospital indemnity and absence
management insurance. It is a subsidiary of StanCorp Financial
Group. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Kenneth D. Quat, Esq.
          QUAT LAW OFFICES
          373 Winch Street
          Framingham, MA 01701
          Telephone: (508) 872-1261
          E-mail: kquat@quatlaw.com

                  - and -

          Michael R. Reese, Esq.
          REESE LLP
          100 West 93rd Street, 16th Floor
          New York, NY 10025
          Telephone: (212) 643-0500
          E-mail: mreese@reesellp.com

                  - and -

          Charles D. Moore, Esq.
          REESE LLP
          121 N. Washington Ave, 4th Floor
          Minneapolis, MN 55401
          Telephone: (212) 643-0500
          E-mail: cmoore@reesellp.com

STATE FARM: Court Amends Preliminary Pretrial Order in Nichols
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CARLLYNN NICHOLS, v. STATE
FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No.
2:22-cv-00016-SDM-EPD (S.D. Ohio), the Hon. Judge Elizabeth A.
Preston Deavers entered an order granting the Defendant's unopposed
motion to amend the preliminary pretrial order.

-- The Amended Preliminary Pretrial Order dated November 22, 2022,
as
    modified on March 17, 2023 (ECF No. 67) and July 17, 2023.

-- The order is further modified as follows:

    The Defendant's opposition to class certification and expert
    reports in opposition to class certification due by December
11,
    2023.

    The Defendant agrees to produce class certification experts for
a
    deposition by January 11, 2024.

    Reply in support of class certification due by January 26,
2024.

State Farm offers vehicle, auto, accident, homeowners, condo
owners, renters, life and annuities, fire and casualty, health,
disability, flood, business, and boat insurance products and
services.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3QM0VDB at no extra charge.[CC]

TRAEGER PELLET: Emergency Bid to Stay Yates Proceedings Tossed
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Michael Yates, et al., v.
Traeger Pellet Grills, Case No. 2:19-cv-00723-DAK (D. Utah), the
Hon. Judge Dale A. Kimball entered an order denying Traeger's
emergency motion to stay.

Notwithstanding this denial, the Court will extend the due date for
Traeger's opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment until December 1, 2023.

Plaintiffs Michael Yates and Norman L. Jones' filed an Opposition.

The Court finds oral argument will not be helpful in determining
the Motion. Having considered the parties' briefing and the
applicable law, the Court will deny Defendant's motion to stay for
the reasons set forth below.

The parties agree that Defendant's request for a stay, pending its
Rule 23(f) request for discretionary appeal before the Tenth
Circuit, is governed by a "flexible application" of the four-factor
balancing test used in the context of preliminary injunctions,
namely:

   (1) whether there is a substantial likelihood that the movant
will
       succeed on the merits of the claims/appeal;

   (2) whether the movant will suffer irreparable injury if an
       injunction/stay does not issue;

   (3) whether others will suffer harm if an injunction/stay is
       granted; and

   (4) whether the public interest will be furthered by an
injunction
       /stay/Defendant does not persuade the Court that these
factors
       militate in favor of a stay.

Traeger offers amazing wood pellet grills.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/46qXUOO at no extra charge.[CC]

TRANSAMERICA PREMIER: Bid Stay Phan Class Suit OK'd
---------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DUNG PHAN, v. TRANSAMERICA
PREMIER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 5:20-cv-03665-BLF (N.D.
Cal.), the Hon. Judge Beth Labson Freeman entered an order granting
Transamerica's motion to stay the action.

This case is stayed until November 14, 2024. The parties are to
submit a joint status report to the Court within 14 days of the
resolution of Farley or Small or on November 14, 2024, whichever is
earlier.

Under these circumstances, the Court finds it appropriate to
terminate the pending motion for class certification without
prejudice to Phan. Once the stay is lifted, Phan may either rewrite
the motion consistent with Ninth Circuit precedent or resubmit the
motion previously presented.

Accordingly, the Court finds this stay of a finite duration is the
most efficient and fair way to handle the litigation of this case.

Transamerica moves to stay this case pending the resolution of the

appeals in:

   "Farley v. Lincoln Benefit Life Co., Case No.
2:20-CV-02485-KJM-DB,
   2023 WL 3007413 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2023), appeal docketed, Case

   No. 23-80037 (9th Cir. May 3, 2023);" and

   "Small v. Allianz Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., Case No.
   CV2001944TJHKESX, 2023 WL 4042593 (C.D. Cal. May 23, 2023),
appeal
   docketed, No. 23-80050 (9th Cir. June 6, 2023)."

The Plaintiff Phan filed an opposition to the motion. Transamerica
filed a reply in support of its motion. The Court vacated the
hearing on the motion, originally scheduled for February 15, 2024.

In 1998, Phan acquired a life insurance policy that is now
administered by Transamerica. In May of 2018, Phan missed a premium
payment. On May 22, 2018, Transamerica sent Phan a "Grace Notice,"
which required her to pay the premium or the policy would lapse.

The Phan did not pay in time, and the policy lapsed on July 23,
2018. On July 24, 2018, Transamerica sent Phan a "Lapse Notice,"
informing Phan that her policy was no longer in force.

Phan amended her complaint and filed a new motion to certify a
class,
defining the proposed class as follows:

   "All (1) owners, or (2) beneficiaries upon a death of the
insured,
   of Defendant's individual life insurance policies issued in
   California before 2013 that Defendant lapsed or terminated for
the
   non-payment of premium in or after 2013 without first complying

   with all the requirements of Insurance Code Sections 10113.71
and
   10113.72."

   The Elder Abuse Sub-Class:

   "All members of the Class who were also 65 years of age or older
at
   the time their policy lapsed or terminated.

Transamerica is a life insurance company incorporated under Iowa
law.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3R6zvJ1 at no extra charge.[CC]

VETERANS AFFAIRS: Davis Seeks to Enforce Settlement Deal
--------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as PHYLLIS M. DAVIS, v. DENIS
MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS, AND EARL LEE, Case No. 2:22-cv-10234-DML-APP (E.D. Mich.),
the Plaintiff moves the court to enforce the settlement as soon as
possible, and for sanctions:

   1. The parties reached an agreement for settlement on August 22,

      2023.

   2. Thereafter, Veteran's Administration required Plaintiff's
      attorney to apply to be and register as a "vendor" of the
agency

   3. The Plaintiff's attorney completed the process and has been
an
      agency vendor since mid-September.

   4. The settlement proceeds have not been deposited to date.
      Moreover, Plaintiff's attorney has been given no explanation
for
      the delay, nor any commitment as to when the money will be
      deposited.

   5. Both Plaintiff and her attorney have been unduly compromised
by
      the unexplained failure of the defendant to pay the
settlement
      amount.

Veterans Affairs is responsible for administering benefit programs
for veterans, their families, and their survivors.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3urV0MI at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ernest L. Jarrett, Esq.
          24800 Denso Dr. Suite 255
          Southfield, MI 48033
          Telephone: (313) 964-2002
          Facsimile: (248) 569-5008
          E-mail: eljlaw@yahoo.com

WARDEN COLBERT: Court Tosses Peake's Bid to Amend Class Complaint
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as STEPHON PEAKE, v. WARDEN
D. COLBERT and CAPTAIN BROWN, Case No. 3:23-cv-00240-DPJ-FKB (S.D.
Miss.), the Hon. Judge Daniel P. Jordan III entered an order:

   (1) Denying Plaintiff Stephon Peake's Motion to Amend Civil
       Complaint seeking certification of a class action under
Federal
       Rule of Civil Procedure 23;

   (2) Denying the Plaintiff Stephon Peake's request to add Terrell

       Davis and Diaquan Tucker as Plaintiffs;

   (3) Directing the Clerk to mail to Terrell Davis, No. 33774-034,

       FCC Yazoo City USP, P.O. Box 5000, Yazoo City, MS 39194, a
form
       used to file a civil complaint and a form to file a request
to
       proceed in forma pauperis; and

   (4) Directing the Clerk to mail to Diaquan Tucker, No.
16982-089,
       FCC Yazoo City USP, P.O. Box 5000, Yazoo City, MS 39194, a
form
       used to file a civil complaint and a form to file a request
to
       proceed in forma pauperis.

A copy of the Court's order dated Nov. 13, 2023 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3MPu4g2 at no extra charge.[CC]

WELLPARTNER INC: Breaches Pharmacy Contract, Cloney's Suit Alleges
------------------------------------------------------------------
CLONEY'S PHARMACY, INC., et al., on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. WELLPARTNER, INC., et al.,
Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-10088-MKV (S.D.N.Y., November 16,
2023) is a class action against the Defendants for breach of
contract.

According to the complaint, the Defendants breached their Contact
Pharmacy Services Agreements with the Plaintiffs by failing to
account the direct and indirect remuneration fees on the total
amount collected on 340B eligible claims.

Cloney's Pharmacy, Inc. is a pharmacy operator based in
California.

Willow Creek Pharmacy, Inc. is a pharmacy operator based in
California.

JCH Pharmacy Holdings, Inc. is a pharmacy operator based in
California.

Wellpartner, Inc. is a provider of 340B contract pharmacy programs
based in Oregon.

Wellpartner, LLC is a provider of 340B contract pharmacy programs
based in Oregon. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                
      
         Jonathan E. Levitt, Esq.
         FRIER & LEVITT, LLC
         84 Bloomfield Avenue
         Pine Brook, NJ 07058
         Telephone: (973) 618-1660
         Facsimile: (973) 535-0650
         E-mail: jlevitt@frierlevitt.com

                 - and -

         Matthew Modafferi, Esq.
         FRIER LEVITT LLC
         101 Greenwich Street
         Ste. 8th Floor, Suite 8B
         New York, NY 10006
         Telephone: (646) 970-6882
         E-mail: mmodafferi@frierlevitt.com

WESLEY FINANCIAL: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Gaujot and Davis Claim
-------------------------------------------------------------------
PAUL GAUJOT and CHARLES CARY DAVIS, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. WESLEY FINANCIAL GROUP,
LLC, Defendant, Case No. 3:23-cv-01188 (M.D. Tenn., November 13,
2023) seeks to remedy Defendant's failure to pay all unpaid or
underpaid overtime to which Plaintiffs are entitled under the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiff Gaujot was employed by Defendant from approximately March
2022 to approximately September 2022. He spent approximately the
first two weeks of his employment training to work as a
Qualification Specialist and approximately one week working as a
Qualification Specialist. He then went on to work for Defendant as
a Vice President and remained in this Vice President role for the
remainder of his employment. As both a Qualification Specialist and
Vice President, Plaintiff Gaujot was paid by the hour, plus
commissions and/or bonuses. However, the Defendant failed to
include commissions and/or bonuses on his paychecks when
calculating his regular rate of pay for overtime purposes, says the
Plaintiff.

Based in Franklin, TN, Wesley Financial Group, LLC is a Tennessee
limited liability company that owns and operates a time share
cancellation company. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

         David W. Garrison, Esq.
         Joshua A. Frank, Esq.
         Nicole A. Chanin, Esq.
         BARRETT JOHNSTON MARTIN & GARRISON, PLLC
         200 31st  Avenue North
         Nashville, TN 37203
         Telephone: (615) 244-2202
         Facsimile: (615) 252-3798
         E-mail: dgarrison@barrettjohnston.com
                 jfrank@barrettjohnston.com
                 nchanin@barrettjohnston.com
               
                 - and -

         Mathew R. Zenner, Esq.
         ZENNER LAW, PLLC
         320 Seven Springs Way, Suite 250
         Brentwood, TN 37027
         Telephone: (615) 425-3476
         mrzennerlaw@gmail.com

WHALECO INC: Retail App Violates Data Privacy Rights, Ziboukh Says
------------------------------------------------------------------
JEHAN ZIBOUKH, MARGRET PHILIE, VERA FIGLOCK, NICOLE MAY, TYANA
DAUGHTERY, SOLALIZ HERNANDEZ, and DEBRA KRYSTYN, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. WHALECO
INC. D/B/A TEMU, AND PDD HOLDINGS INC. F/K/A PINDUODUO INC.,
Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-15653 (N.D. Ill., Nov. 3, 2023) is a
proposed nationwide class action alleging Defendants' violations of
the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act, the right to privacy under Mass. Gen. Laws Ch., the
Massachusetts Wiretap Act. The lawsuit further seeks restitution
for unjust enrichment, and asserts additional state-law claims
under Illinois, California and Virginia law, including claims under
Illinois's Biometric Information Privacy Act.

In 2022, Defendants launched an online shopping platform, Temu, in
the United States. The Temu mobile app and website allows users to
purchase low-cost goods manufactured in China. Experts who have
reviewed the app have concluded that the "TEMU app is purposefully
and intentionally loaded with tools to execute virulent and
dangerous malware and spyware activities on user devices which have
downloaded and installed the TEMU app. In addition, they have
concluded that "Temu misled people about how it uses their data."
The experts further notes that Temu collects user data beyond what
is necessary for an online shopping app, including biometric
information and data from users of the app, says the suit.

As a result of such privacy violations, it has been reported that
Apple recently concluded that the Temu app "violated the company's
mandatory privacy rules." Indeed, experts have found "smoking gun
evidence" that the "widely downloaded shopping app TEMU is the most
dangerous malware/spyware package currently in widespread
circulation," the suit asserts.

Whaleco Inc. d/b/a Temu is ultimately owned by the Nasdaq-listed
Chinese company PDD Holdings Inc., which runs the Chinese
e-commerce giant Pinduoduo, an online shopping platform that is the
precursor for the Temu platform.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Steve W. Berman, Esq.
          HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
          1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000
          Seattle, WA 98101
          Telephone: (206) 623-7292
          Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
          E-mail: steve@hbsslaw.com

               - and -

          Jeannie Evans, Esq.
          HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP  
          455 N. Cityfront Plaza Dr., Suite 2410
          Chicago, IL 60611
          Telephone: (708) 628-4962
          Facsimile: (708) 628-4952
          E-mail: jeannie@hbsslaw.com

               - and -

          Douglas G. Smith, Esq.
          AURELIUS LAW GROUP LLC
          77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4500
          Chicago, IL 60601
          Telephone: (312) 451-6708
          E-mail: dsmith@aureliuslawgroup.com

WHITESTONE HOME: Wilson Sues Over Fake Sale Prices, Discounts
-------------------------------------------------------------
JEREMY WILSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. WHITESTONE HOME FURNISHINGS, LLC, Defendant,
Case No. 2:23-at-01125 (E.D. Cal., Nov. 3, 2023) is a class action
against the Defendant for breach of contract, breach of express
warranty, quasi-contract/unjust enrichment, negligent
misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation, and violation of
the California's False Advertising Law, Legal Remedies Act, and
Unfair Competition Law.

According to the complaint, Defendant's website prominently
advertises purportedly time-limited, sitewide sales for the
products. These sales offer "X% off," and purport to end at a
certain date and time. The discounts associated with the advertised
sales can be seen on a banner at the top of the website, such as
"15% off order $1k+ | TODAY ONLY." The Defendant also advertises
purported discounts off regular prices. But these advertisements
are false since the Defendant always offers site-wide discounts off
of the purported regular prices. In other words, the sales are not
limited in time; instead, they always reset and continue to be
available (albeit, in certain cases, with a different name). Plus,
the list prices Defendant advertises are not actually Defendant's
regular prices (the prices they usually charge), because
Defendant's products are regularly available for less than those
prices, says the suit.

Plaintiff Wilson bought a product from Defendant online on
www.saatva.com. Like Defendant's other customers, when Plaintiff
bought the product, Defendant allegedly advertised that a purported
sale was going on, and that the product was heavily discounted.

Whitestone Home Furnishings, LLC makes, sells, and markets Saatva
brand mattresses, bedding, and furniture products which are sold
online through Defendant's website, www.saatva.com.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Christin Cho, Esq.
          Simon Franzini, Esq.
          Grace Bennett, Esq.
          DOVEL & LUNER, LLP
          201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600
          Santa Monica, CA 90401
          Telephone: (310) 656-7066
          Facsimile: (310) 656-7069   
          E-mail: christin@dovel.com
                  simon@dovel.com
                  grace@dovel.com

WYNN RESORTS LTD: Continues to Defend Ferries Securities Class Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wynn Resorts Ltd. Disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending September 30, 2023 filed with the
securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2023, that the
Company continues to defend itself from the Ferris securities class
suit in the United States District Court, Southern District of New
York.

On February 20, 2018, a putative securities class action was filed
against the Company and certain current and former officers of the
Company in the United States District Court, Southern District of
New York (which was subsequently transferred to the United States
District Court, District of Nevada) by John V. Ferris and Joann M.
Ferris on behalf of all persons who purchased the Company's common
stock between February 28, 2014 and January 25, 2018.

The complaint alleges, among other things, certain violations of
federal securities laws and seeks to recover unspecified damages as
well as attorneys' fees, costs and related expenses for the
plaintiffs.

On April 15, 2019, the Company filed a motion to dismiss, which the
court granted on May 27, 2020, with leave to amend.

On July 1, 2020, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.

On August 14, 2020, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the
amended complaint.

On July 28, 2021, the court granted in part, and denied in part,
the Company's motion to dismiss the amended complaint, dismissing
certain of plaintiffs' claims, including all claims against current
CEO Craig Billings and the individual directors, and allowing other
claims to proceed against the Company and several of the Company's
former executive officers, including Matthew Maddox, Stephen A.
Wynn, Kimmarie Sinatra, and Steven Cootey.

On March 2, 2023, the court granted the plaintiffs' motion for
class certification and appointed lead counsel.

The parties are now proceeding with discovery.

The defendants in this action intend to vigorously defend against
the claims pleaded against them and believe that the claims are
without merit.

Wynn Resorts, Limited, a Nevada corporation (together with its
subsidiaries), is a designer, developer, and operator of
integrated
resorts featuring luxury hotel rooms, high-end retail space, an
array of dining and entertainment options, meeting and convention
facilities, and gaming.

XACTUS LLC: Cinner Sues Over Consumer Credit Violations
-------------------------------------------------------
YAAKOV CINNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. XACTUS, LLC, Defendant, Case No.
2:23-cv-04531 (E.D. Pa., November 16, 2023) is a class action
against the Defendant for violation of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act.

The nature of the suit is stated as 480 Other Statutes - Consumer
Credit.

Xactus, LLC is a mortgage credit reporting platform provider in
Pennsylvania. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         John Soumilas, Esq.
         FRANCIS MAILMAN SOUMILAS, P.C.
         1600 Market Street, Suite 2510
         Philadelphia, PA 19103
         Telephone: (215) 735-8600
         Facsimile: (215) 940-8000
         E-mail: jsoumilas@consumerlawfirm.com


                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Rousel Elaine T.
Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L.
Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2023. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***