/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/CAR_Public/230908.mbx               C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Friday, September 8, 2023, Vol. 25, No. 181

                            Headlines

2BIGFEET LLC: Zinnamon Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
451 GRAND AVENUE: Underpays Drivers and Workers, Rugerio Claims
ACSWISS INC: Salazar Sues to Recover Unpaid Tips and Wages
ADVANCE AMERICA: Wilkinson Files Suit in D. South Carolina
AKOO/RP55 LLC: Cromitie Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York

AMERICAN GLOBAL: Fardan Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
ASSESSOR OF VALLEY STREAM: Demeo Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct.
BALCHEM CORP: Maceira Sues Over Exposure to Toxic Chemical
BANK OF AMERICA: March Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages for Bank Employees
BIOVENTRIX INC: Moline Files Suit in Del. Chancery Ct.

BOOK CULTURE: Martin Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
BUTTERFLY NETWORK: Continues to Defend Rose Class Suit in N.J.
CHELSEA MORNING: Martin Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
CIGNA CORPORATION: Auto Rejects Insureds' Claims, Veinbergs Says
CITY ELECTRIC: Winn Suit Removed to S.D. California

CITY STORAGE: Nasser Sues Over Virtual Restaurants' Misleading Ads
COX AUTOMOTIVE: Touch Suit Removed to E.D. California
CREATORS AGENCY: Garrison Suit Transferred to S.D. Florida
CRUMBL LLC: Watson Sues Over Hidden Service Fees on Online Purchase
DUPONT DE NEMOURS: Millege Sues Over Cutters' Unpaid Overtime Wages

DUTCH FREDS: Martin Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
ELMWOOD VENTURES: Martin Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
EMAGIN CORP: Continues to Defend Heckerman Class Suit in Delaware
ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS: Fails to Properly Pay Car Detailers, Odam Says
EP GLOBAL: Minnich Sues Over Disclosure of Info to Unknown Parties

ERNST LICHT EMBROIDERY: Jones Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
ESOTERIX INC: Lal Suit Removed to C.D. California
FONTANA SPORTS: Jones Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
GENERAL ARMY NAVY: Jones Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
GLORYBEE FOODS: Dawson Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York

GOLDMAN SACHS: LifeStance IPO Securities Suit Ongoing
GOLDMAN SACHS: Oak Street IPO Securities Suit Ongoing
GOLDMAN SACHS: ON24 IPO Securities Suit Ongoing
GOLDMAN SACHS: Opendoor Tech IPO Securities Suit Ongoing
GOLDMAN SACHS: Oscar Health IPO Securities Suit Ongoing

GRAND SLAM NEW YORK: Martin Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
GSRH WINGS: Fails to Provide Predictability Pay, Simms Suit Alleges
HARTER'S FOX: Soto Sues Over Drivers/Parts Managers' Unpaid Wages
HUB INTERNATIONAL: Roy Sues Over Failure to Secure Information
HUMANA INC: Herrera ADA Suit Removed to D. New Jersey

INNOVATIVE WAREHOUSING: Sanchez Sues Over Unpaid Compensations
J. CREW GROUP: Wiretaps Email Recipients' Communications, Muto Says
JPAY LLC: Bibbs Files Suit in S.D. Ohio
KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL: Gonzales Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
KONARK ENTERPRISES: Mahadev Sues Over Unpaid Minimum, Overtime Wage

LA LA LEAF LLC: Luis Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
LA-Z BOY INCORPORATED: Lanicek Files TCPA Suit in E.D. Michigan
LESLIE'S POOLMART: Fails to Timely Pay Wages, Patterson Suit Claims
LIVE VENTURES: Continues to Defend Sanchez Labor-Related Class Suit
LIVE VENTURES: Continues to Defend Sieggreen Class Suit in Nevada

LTA AIR LINES: McCauley Suit Removed to C.D. California
LUTHER BURBAN: Continues to Defend Siegel Class Suit in California
MADISON REED: Heeren Files TCPA Suit in N.D. Illinois
MATTIS PROPERTIES: Wagner Sues Over Disabled's Access to Stores
MAXIMUS INC: Fails to Protect Patients' Personal Info, Wilt Says

MCKENDREE UNIVERSITY: Senior Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
MELRIC SYSTEMS: Ortiz Seeks Unpaid Wages for Non-Exempt Workers
MISTER CAR WASH: Labor Class Suit Mediation Set for October 19
MITCHELL GOLD: Price Sues Over Unpaid Wages and Benefits
MONRO INC: Fails to Pay OT Wages Under FLSA, Wise Class Suit Claims

NATERA INC: Bid to Dismiss Securities Suit Pending in Texas Court
NCINO INC: Settlement Reached in Sherman Act-Related Suit
PET FOOD WAREHOUSE: Cromitie Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
PIER 39 LP: Watson Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
PLAYSTUDIOS INC: Continues to Defend Felipe Suit in California

POWER INNOVATIONS: Maxwell Sues Over Electricians' Unpaid Wages
POWERSCHOOL HOLDINGS: Collects Students' Private Info, Suit Says
PRIMO HOME: Faces Montero Wage-and-Hour Suit in S.D.N.Y.
RBS SHOE CORPORATION: Cromitie Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
ROMAX GROUP: Garcia Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages

S.E.S.A. FLEET: Faces Salinas Suit Over Unpaid Wages for Mechanics
SICKAFUS SHEEPSKINS: Jones Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
STATE FARM: Miscalculates Insureds' COI Rates, Niewinski Alleges
STRENGTH20 LLC: Sanchez Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages for Security Guards
SUNRISE RESTAURANTS: Melgar Sues Over Unpaid Minimum Wages & Tips

SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: Williams Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
TEXAS GROUNDWORKS: Navarrete Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
TOTAL HOME: Mayancela Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
TRIBUNE PUBLISHING: Arnold Suit Removed to N.D. Illinois
TRINSEO PLC: Continues to Defend Bristoll Spill-Related Class Suit

TYSON FOODS: Broiler Antitrust Class Suit Scope Narrowed
TYSON FOODS: Continues to Defend Peterson Class Suit
UMA EDUCATION: Underpays Inside Sales Representatives, Lewis Claims
UNITEDLEX CORPORATION: Behrendt Suit Transferred to D. Kansas
VIA ALLORO: Pardo Seeks Unpaid Overtime Wages for Food Runners

WESTERN DIGITAL: Solid-State Drives "Defective," Pousa Alleges
WESTPOINT HOME: Zinnamon Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
YEAR OF OURS: Luis Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York

                        Asbestos Litigation

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Avon Products Has 275 Cases Pending as of June 30
ASBESTOS UPDATE: CIRCOR Int'l. Still Faces Product Liability Claims
ASBESTOS UPDATE: FG Group Defends Personal Injury Lawsuits
ASBESTOS UPDATE: GlassBridge Defends Exposure Claims


                            *********

2BIGFEET LLC: Zinnamon Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against 2BigFeet, LLC. The
case is styled as Warren Zinnamon, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. 2BigFeet, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-07664
(S.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

2BigFeet -- https://www.2bigfeet.com/ -- specializes in large shoes
for men.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


451 GRAND AVENUE: Underpays Drivers and Workers, Rugerio Claims
---------------------------------------------------------------
ALDO RUGERIO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. 451 GRAND AVENUE, LLC and JOSEPH R.
PAGLIARO, Defendants, Case No. 3:23-cv-01113 (D. Conn., August 22,
2023) is a class action against the Defendants for failure to pay
overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the
Connecticut Wage Act.

The Plaintiff was employed as a driver and instillation worker at
the Defendants' flooring, painting, and window treatment company
located at 451 Grand Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut from
approximately November 2016 to, through and including March 16,
2023.

451 Grand Avenue, LLC is a limited liability company doing business
in Connecticut. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Joshua Levin-Epstein, Esq.
         Jason Mizrahi, Esq.
         LEVIN-EPSTEIN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
         60 East 42nd Street, Suite 4700
         New York, NY 10165
         Telephone: (212) 792-0046
         E-mail: Joshua@levinepstein.com

ACSWISS INC: Salazar Sues to Recover Unpaid Tips and Wages
----------------------------------------------------------
Edith Salazar and Emilie Kaminski individually and on behalf of all
persons similarly situated v. Acswiss Inc., d/b/a Checkers
Restaurant and Alex M. Camen, as an individual, Case No.
1:23-cv-06280 (N.D. Ill., Aug. 28, 2023), is brought as a
collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), the
Illinois Minimum Wage Law ("IMWL") Illinois Wage Payment and
Collection Act ("IWPCA"), to recover tips and unpaid minimum wages
and overtime wages.

The Plaintiffs and Collective bring claims based upon Defendants'
policy and procedure and practice of paying $4.00 per hour in cash
for some hours worked by Plaintiffs and collective, thus not paying
the minimum "server rate of pay". Plaintiffs also bring a claim for
minimum wage claims for off-the-clock work specifically that
Plaintiffs and other employees were subject to off-the-clock work
each shift as the Plaintiffs and collective were required to do all
work after the scheduled work time and that time was not paid at
all.

Further Plaintiff alleges that Defendants took Plaintiffs and
collective's tips as Defendants actively deducted 5% of the credit
card tips earned by Plaintiffs from Plaintiffs and collectives'
credit card tips. Such deductions are not legal as per the Illinois
Department of Labor Regulations. Additionally, as tips are
considered wages under the IWPCA and Defendants forced Plaintiffs
to make payments from those wages, via 5% tip out to Defendants,
this is an unauthorized deduction from the Plaintiffs and
collectives tip wages. The deduction is unauthorized as Defendants
did not receive any written authorization for the deduction at the
time that deduction is made from Plaintiffs wages, says the
complaint.

The Plaintiffs were employed by Defendant as servers.

Acswiss Inc., operates a restaurant/bar in Union Illinois doing
business as Checkers Restaurant.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          John C. Ireland, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICE OF JOHN C. IRELAND
          636 Spruce Street
          South Elgin, IL 60177
          Phone: 630-464-9675
          Facsimile: 630-206-0889
          Email: attorneyireland@gmail.com


ADVANCE AMERICA: Wilkinson Files Suit in D. South Carolina
----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Advance America Cash
Advance Centers Inc. The case is styled as John Wilkinson,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on
behalf of the general public v. Advance America Cash Advance
Centers Inc., Case No. 6:23-cv-04347-DCC (D.S.C., Aug. 29, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract for Breach of
Contract.

Advance America -- https://www.advanceamerica.net/ -- is here to
help you with easy online cash advances, fast cash loans and
more.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Elizabeth M. Dalzell, Esq.
          SHEALEY LAW FIRM (COL)
          1507 Richland Street
          Columbia, SC 29201
          Phone: (803) 929-0008
          Fax: (888) 745-1381
          Email: liz@shealeylaw.com


AKOO/RP55 LLC: Cromitie Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against AKOO/RP55, LLC. The
case is styled as Seana Cromitie, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated v. AKOO/RP55, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-07673
(S.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

AKOO/RP55, LLC primarily operates in the Single-family Housing
Construction business.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


AMERICAN GLOBAL: Fardan Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against American Global
Security Inc., et al. The case is styled as Ramzeddeen Fardan,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
American Global Security Inc., Case No. CIVSB2320475 (Cal. Super.
Ct., San Bernardino Cty., Aug. 28, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Complex Civil Unlimited."

American Global Security -- https://americanglobalsecurity.com/ --
provides armed and unarmed guard services to residential, retail,
industrial, and commercial properties.[BN]

ASSESSOR OF VALLEY STREAM: Demeo Files Suit in N.Y. Sup. Ct.
------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against The Assessor of the
Village of Valley Stream, et al. The case is styled as James Demeo,
all other similarly situated Petitioners on the annexed SCHEDULE A,
Petitioners v. The Assessor of the Village of Valley Stream, The
Board of Assessment Review of the Village of Valley Stream,
Respondents, Case No. 613823/2023 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty., Aug.
28, 2023).

The case type is stated as "SP-CPLR Article 78 (Body or Officer)."

Valley Stream -- https://www.vsvny.org/ -- is a village in Nassau
County, on Long Island, in New York.[BN]

The Petitioner is represented by:

          MAIDENBAUM & STERNBERG, LLP
          132 Spruce St
          Cedarhurst, NY 11516-1915


BALCHEM CORP: Maceira Sues Over Exposure to Toxic Chemical
----------------------------------------------------------
Jeanette Perez Maceira, Jose Luis Mateo Perez, and Lilliam M.
Ortiz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
v. Balchem Corp., Customed, Inc., Medtronic PR, Inc., Edward
LifeSciences Technology Sarl, Steri-Tech, Inc., and Mays Chemical
Company of Puerto Rico, Inc., Case No. 3:23-cv-01445 (D.P.R., Aug.
29, 2023), is brought arising from injuries and damages sustained
by Class Members as a proximate result of exposure to the toxic
chemical EtO that was used on, stored on, and emitted from the
premises owned and maintained by the Defendants Customed, Inc.,
Medtronic PR, Inc., Edward
LifeSciences Technology Sarl, and Steri-Tech, Inc. (hereinafter
collectively referred to as "PR Sterilization Facilities"),
distributed by Mays Chemical Company of Puerto Rico, Inc., and
manufactured by Balchem Corp. by and through their managers and
agents, and through their unsafe practices in sterilizing medical
equipment, which released and emitted deadly EtO into the air of
four Puerto Rican communities as part of that process.

Ethylene oxide ("EtO") is a known human carcinogen. As a gas, EtO
is emitted into the air by institutions that sterilize medical
instruments and preserve food, as well as by chemical plants
producing items like antifreeze. Despite being labeled as
cancer-causing by organizations like the EPA, National Toxicology
Program, and the International Association of Research on Cancer,
its discharge from medical sterilization facilities located on the
island affects nearly 13% of neighborhoods in Puerto Rico.

Chronic exposure to EtO has been linked to breast cancer, blood
cancer, stomach cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, pancreatic cancer,
brain cancer, reproductive issues, and miscarriages. In children,
EtO can induce accelerated cell division, increasing DNA mutation
risks. Short-term inhalation can cause symptoms like breathing
difficulties, nausea, headaches, vomiting, tiredness, and
neurological issues.

Despite these dangers, Defendants disregarded EtO's harmful
properties and continued to release it into the surrounding
communities. For decades, Defendants have been emitting substantial
quantities of EtO into the air supply of a sizeable population in
Puerto Rico. As a result, those who live, work, pray, and attend
school in the surrounding area of these facilities have unknowingly
been inhaling EtO in the air they breathe on a routine basis.

The Defendants never informed the residents of these Puerto Rican
communities or those who attend school, live, pray, or work nearby
that it systematically emits EtO into the air, nor did Defendants
warn them that they are routinely and continuously breathing in a
known human carcinogen. Through their industrial processes,
Defendants emit EtO into the air, allowing it to be carried by the
wind and natural air movement throughout the area surrounding the
PR Sterilization Facilities. As such, residents' properties in the
area have unknowingly been exposed to carcinogenic EtO for
decades.

The Defendants knew, or should have known, that EtO is dangerous,
toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, and causes various illnesses. There
is no safe level of EtO; its carcinogenic and DNA-damaging effects
have been widely studied and known since the 1940s and definitively
known to Defendants since at least 1984. Notwithstanding,
Defendants chose to operate their business and emit EtO in a
densely populated area full of children, houses, parks, schools,
and businesses, says the complaint.

The Plaintiffs are persons and citizens of the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico.

The Defendants operate medical sterilization facilities in Puerto
Rico using ethylene oxide ("EtO") manufactured by Balchem Corp. and
distributed by Mays Chemical Company of Puerto Rico, Inc.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Douglas H. Sanders, Esq.
          Marc D. Grossman, Esq.
          Melissa K. Sims, Esq.
          Luis V. Almeida-Olivieri, Esq.
          MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, LLC
          1311 Ponce de Leon Ave. Suite 700
          San Juan, PR, 00907
          Phone: (516) 741-5600
          Fax: (516) 741-0128
          Email: dsanders@milberg.com
                 mgrossman@milberg.com
                 msims@milberg.com
                 lalmeida@milberg.com

               - and -

          Nevin Wisnoski, Esq.
          NAPOLI SHKOLNIK
          1213 Culbreth Drive, Suite 216
          Wilmington, NC 28405
          Phone: (919) 374-1971
          Email: nwisnoski@napolilaw.com


BANK OF AMERICA: March Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages for Bank Employees
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RICHARD MARCH and BELINDA HOLLINS, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Defendant, Case No. 2:23-cv-02360-KHV-TJJ (D. Kan., August 18,
2023) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to
pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and
state law.

Plaintiffs March and Hollins worked for Bank of America as hourly,
non-exempt credit solutions advisors in Kansas.

Bank of America, N.A. is a national bank association with its
principal place of business in North Carolina. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                
      
         George A. Hanson, Esq.
         Alexander T. Ricke, Esq.
         Caleb J. Wagner, Esq.
         STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP
         460 Nichols Road, Suite 200
         Kansas City, MO 64112
         Telephone: (816) 714-7100
         Facsimile: (816) 714-7101
         E-mail: hanson@stuevesiegel.com
                 ricke@stuevesiegel.com
                 wagner@stuevesiegel.com

BIOVENTRIX INC: Moline Files Suit in Del. Chancery Ct.
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Bioventrix, Inc., et
al. The case is styled as Gary Moline, on behalf of himself and all
other similarly situated Holders v. BIOVENTRIX, INC., RAYMOND W.
COHEN, JIM DILLON, DAVID RICHMOND, MICHAEL TAGLICH, RINDA SAMA,
MARK RAVICH, GEORGE FAZIO, ANDREW HINSON, STEVEN HEALY, PROFESSOR
ANDREW COATS, TAGLICH BROTHERS INC., and RICHMOND BROTHERS, INC.,
Case No. 7:23-cv-03437-DCC (Del. Chancery Ct., Aug. 28, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Breach of Fiduciary Duties."

BioVentrix -- https://bioventrix.com/en-us/ -- is a medical device
company focusing on the treatment of congestive heart failure.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Derrick Farrell, Esq.
          BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP
          3411 Silverside Rd.
          Baynard Building, Ste 104
          Wilmington, DE 19810
          Phone: (302) 499-2158


BOOK CULTURE: Martin Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Book Culture, Inc.
The case is styled as Damian Martin, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Book Culture, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-06442 (E.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Book Culture Inc. -- https://www.bookculture.com/ -- is a new and
used bookstore in New York City, specializing in literature and
work by academic presses.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


BUTTERFLY NETWORK: Continues to Defend Rose Class Suit in N.J.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Butterfly Network Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2023 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 4, 2023, that the Company continues
to defend itself from the Rose class suit in the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey.

On February 16, 2022, a putative class action lawsuit, styled Rose
v. Butterfly Network, Inc., et al. (Case No. 2:22-cv-00854) was
filed in the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey against the Company, its then President and Chief Executive
Officer, its then Chief Financial Officer, and the Chairman of its
Board of Directors as well as Longview's Chairman (who is a
director of the Company), Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, and members of Longview’s Board of Directors prior to
the Business Combination, alleging violations of Sections 10(b),
14(a), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5 and 14a-9
promulgated thereunder.

On August 8, 2022, the Court appointed KNS Holdings LLC DBPP UA
Jan. 1, 2016 as lead plaintiff and Levy & Korsinsky as lead
counsel.  

On November 1, 2022, lead plaintiff, along with plaintiff Carl
Metzgar, filed an Amended Class Action Complaint. In addition to
alleging violations of Sections 10(b), 14(a), and 20(a) of the
Exchange Act, plaintiff also alleges violations of Sections 11 and
15 of the Securities Act.

The alleged class consists of all persons or entities who purchased
or otherwise acquired the Company's stock between January 12, 2021
and November 15, 2021, persons who exchanged Longview shares for
the Company's common stock, and persons who purchased Longview
stock pursuant, or traceable to, the Proxy/Registration Statement
filed with the SEC on November 27, 2020 or any amendment thereto.

The lawsuit is premised upon allegations that the defendants made
false and misleading statements and/or omissions about its
post-Business Combination business and financial prospects.

The Company intends to vigorously defend against this action.



CHELSEA MORNING: Martin Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Chelsea Morning, Inc.
The case is styled as Damian Martin, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Chelsea Morning, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-06438 (E.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Chelsea Morning, Inc. is a gift shop in New York City.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


CIGNA CORPORATION: Auto Rejects Insureds' Claims, Veinbergs Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
HANNAH VEINBERGS, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. CIGNA CORPORATION and CIGNA HEALTH
AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants, Case No.
3:23-cv-01540-LAB-DEB (S.D. Cal., August 21, 2023) is a class
action against the Defendants for breach of the implied covenant of
good faith and fair dealing, violation of California's Unfair
Competition Law, intentional interference with contractual
relations, and unjust enrichment.

The case arises from Cigna's illegal scheme to systematically,
wrongfully, and automatically deny its insureds the thorough,
individualized physician review of claims guaranteed to them by law
and, ultimately, the payments for necessary medical procedures owed
to them under Cigna's health insurance policies. Relying on an
algorithm known as PXDX system, Cigna's doctors instantly reject
claims on medical grounds without ever opening patient files,
leaving thousands of patients effectively without coverage and with
unexpected bills. By engaging in this misconduct, Cigna breached
its fiduciary duties, including its duty of good faith and fair
dealing, because its conduct serves Cigna's own economic
self-interest and elevates its interests above the interests of its
insureds, says the suit.

Cigna Corporation is an insurance company headquartered at 900
Cottage Grove Road, Bloomfield, Connecticut.

Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Cigna Corporation, headquartered in Bloomfield,
Connecticut. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         George V. Granade, Esq.
         REESE LLP
         8484 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 515
         Los Angeles, CA 90211
         Telephone: (310) 393-0070
         Facsimile: (212) 253-4272
         E-mail: ggranade@reesellp.com

                 - and -

         Michael R. Reese, Esq.
         REESE LLP
         100 West 93rd Street, 16th Floor
         New York, NY 10025
         Telephone: (212) 643-0500
         Facsimile: (212) 253-4272
         E-mail: mreese@reesellp.com

                 - and -

         Charles D. Moore, Esq.
         REESE LLP
         100 South 5th Street, Suite 1900
         Minneapolis, MN 55402
         Telephone: (212) 643-0500
         Facsimile: (212) 253-4272
         E-mail: cmoore@reesellp.com

                 - and -

         Kevin Laukaitis, Esq.
         LAUKAITIS LAW LLC
         954 Avenida Ponce De Leon
         Suite 205, #10518
         San Juan, PR 00907
         Telephone: (215) 789-4462
         E-mail: klaukaitis@laukaitislaw.com

CITY ELECTRIC: Winn Suit Removed to S.D. California
---------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Richard Winn, an individual, on behalf of
himself, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated v. CITY
ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a Florida corporation; and DOES 1-50,
Inclusive, Case No. 37-2023-29456-CU-OE-CTLwas removed from the
Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San
Diego, to the United States District Court for the Southern
District of California on Aug. 28, 2023, and assigned Case No.
3:23-cv-01577-RBM-BLM.

The Complaint asserts the following causes of action: unfair
competition in violation of California Business and Professions
Code; failure to pay minimum wages; failure to pay overtime wages;
failure to provide required meal periods; failure to provide
required rest periods; failure to pay wages when due; failure to
provide accurate itemized statements; and failure to reimburse
employees for required expenses.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Eugene Ryu, Esq.
          Penny Chen, Esq.
          Paul Suh, Esq.028
          K&L GATES LLP
          10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 8th Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Phone: 310.553.5000
          Fax: 310.553.5001
          Email: Gene.Ryu@klgates.com
                 Penny.Chen@klgates.com
                 Paul.Suh@klgates.com


CITY STORAGE: Nasser Sues Over Virtual Restaurants' Misleading Ads
------------------------------------------------------------------
STEFANI NASSER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. CITY STORAGE SYSTEMS LLC d/b/a
CLOUDKITCHENS, Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-06310-PKC-MMH
(E.D.N.Y., August 22, 2023) is a class action against the
Defendants for violations of State Consumer Protection Statues and
New York General Business Law and for quasi-contract/unjust
enrichment.

According to the complaint, the Defendant is engaged in false,
deceptive, and misleading advertising, labeling, and marketing of
virtual restaurants on food delivery platforms throughout the
United States. Specifically, the Defendant lists its virtual
restaurants with all of the indicia of a regular brick-and-mortar
restaurant. But the Defendant's virtual restaurants do not exist.
Instead, they are merely virtual storefronts which outsource the
actual cooking to other existing restaurants and delis, who, in
turn, use a shared kitchen to service other menus. As a result of
the Defendant's deceptive practices, the Plaintiff and the Class
members suffered an economic injury because they would not have
purchased (or paid a premium for) the food offered by the virtual
restaurants had they known the veracity of the Defendant's
misrepresentations and omissions, says the suit.

City Storage Systems LLC, doing business as CloudKitchens, is a
provider of real estate services, with its principal place of
business in Glendale, California. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Adrian Gucovschi, Esq.
         GUCOVSCHI ROZENSHTEYN, PLLC
         140 Broadway, Suite 4667
         New York, NY 10005
         Telephone: (212) 884-4230
         E-mail: adrian@gr-firm.com

COX AUTOMOTIVE: Touch Suit Removed to E.D. California
-----------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Samnang Touch, as an individual and on behalf
of all others similarly situated v. COX AUTOMOTIVE CORP SVCS., LLC,
a limited liability company; COX AUTOMOTIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS,
INC., a corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No.
STK-CV-UOE-2023-0005193 was removed from the Superior Court of the
State of California for the County of San Joaquin, to the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of California on
Aug. 29, 2023, and assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-01848-KJN.

The Complaint alleges one cause of action for violation of Labor
Code. The Complaint seeks to certify the following classes: a. All
current and former employees of Defendant in the State of
California who were paid any wages at any time from May 19, 2022,
through the present (the "Name of Employer Class"); and b. All
current and former non-exempt employees of Defendant in the State
of California who were paid overtime wages at any time from May 19,
2022, through the present.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          William L. Marder, Esq.
          POLARIS LAW GROUP
          501 San Benito Street, Suite 200
          Hollister, CA 95023
          Phone: (831) 531-4214
          Facsimile: (831) 634-0333
          Email: bill@polarislawgroup.com

               - and -

          Edward W. Choi, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF CHOI & ASSOCIATES
          515 S. Figueroa St., Suite 1250
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Phone: (213) 381-1515
          Facsimile: (213) 465-4885
          Email: edward.choi@choiandassociates.com

               - and -

          Dennis S. Hyun, Esq.
          HYUN LEGAL, APC
          515 S. Figueroa St., Suite 1250
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Phone: (213) 488-6555
          Facsimile: (213) 488-6554
          Email: dhyun@hyunlegal.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Larry W. Lee, Esq.
          DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, P.C.
          515 S. Figueroa St., Suite 1250
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Phone: (213) 488-6555
          Facsimile: (213) 488-6554
          Email: lwlee@diversitylaw.com


CREATORS AGENCY: Garrison Suit Transferred to S.D. Florida
----------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Edwin Garrison, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated v. Creators Agency, LLC, Case No.
2:23-cv-00139 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
District of Wyoming, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Florida on Aug. 29, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:23-cv-23304 to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud.

Creators Agency -- https://creatorsagency.co/ -- is a talent
management agency for digital creators.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Alex Freeburg, Esq.
          FREEBURG LAW LLC
          PO Box 3442
          Jackson, WY 83001
          Phone: (307) 200-9720
          Email: alex@tetonattorney.com

               - and -

          Adam M. Moskowitz, Esq.
          Joseph M. Kaye, Esq.
          THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC
          Continental Plaza
          3250 Mary Street, Suite 202
          Coconut Grove, FL 33133
          Phone: (305) 740-1423
          Email: adam@moskowitz-law.com
                 joseph@moskowitz-law.com
                 rejane@moskowitz-law.com

               - and -

          David Boies, Esq.
          Alex Boies, Esq.
          Brooke Alexander, Esq.
          BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
          333 Main Street
          Armonk, NY 10504
          Phone: (914) 749–8200
          Email: dboies@bsfllp.com


CRUMBL LLC: Watson Sues Over Hidden Service Fees on Online Purchase
-------------------------------------------------------------------
LISA WATSON and ANGELA KEERS, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. CRUMBL LLC, CRUMBL IP,
LLC, and CRUMBL FRANCHISING, LLC, Defendants, Case No.
2:23-cv-01770-DJC-CKD (E.D. Cal., August 21, 2023) is a class
action against the Defendants for violations of the California
Consumer Legal Remedies Act, the California False Advertising Law,
and the California Unfair Competition Law, and for fraudulent
misrepresentation, and unjust enrichment/quasi-contract.

The case arises from the Defendants' practice of charging a
concealed 2.95% service fee every time a customer utilizes the
Crumbl App to purchase Crumbl's products. As a result of this
automatic fee, customers pay a uniformly higher price for Crumbl's
products than advertised on the menu. The Plaintiffs and Class
members have suffered injury in fact, including economic damages,
says the suit.

Crumbl LLC is a bakery company, with its principal place of
business in Orem, Utah.

Crumbl IP, LLC is a bakery company, with its principal place of
business in Orem, Utah.

Crumbl Franchising, LLC is a bakery company, with its principal
place of business in Orem, Utah. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                
      
         Alex Straus, Esq.
         MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN LLP
         280 S. Beverly Drive, PH Suite
         Beverly Hills, CA 90212
         Telephone: (866) 252-0878
         Facsimile: (615) 921-6501
         E-mail: astraus@milberg.com

                 - and -

         Erin Ruben, Esq.
         MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN LLP
         900 W. Morgan St.
         Raleigh, NC 27603
         Telephone: (865) 247-0080
         Facsimile: (865) 522-0049
         E-mail: eruben@milberg.com

                 - and -

         Harper T. Segui, Esq.
         MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN LLP
         825 Lowcountry Blvd., Suite 101
         Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
         Telephone: (919) 600-5000
         E-mail: hsegui@milberg.com

                 - and -

         Rachel Soffin, Esq.
         MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN LLP
         800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100
         Knoxville, TN 37929
         Telephone: (865) 247-0080
         Facsimile: (865) 522-0049
         E-mail: rsoffin@milberg.com

DUPONT DE NEMOURS: Millege Sues Over Cutters' Unpaid Overtime Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DUANE MILLEGE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC. and DUPONT SPECIALTY
PRODUCTS USA, LLC, Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-00908-UNA (D. Del.,
August 18, 2023) is a class action against the Defendants for
failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

The Plaintiff has been employed by the Defendants as an
hourly-based cutter at their location in Hemlock, Michigan from
approximately September 2021 to the present.

DuPont De Nemours, Inc. is a chemicals company headquartered in
Wilmington, Delaware.

DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC is a chemicals company
headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Brian E. Farnan, Esq.
         Michael J. Farnan, Esq.
         FARNAN LLP
         919 North Market Street, 12th Floor
         Wilmington, DE 19801
         Telephone: (302) 777-0300
         Facsimile: (302) 777-0301
         E-mail: bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
                 mfarnan@farnanlaw.com

                 - and -

         Hans A. Nilges, Esq.
         NILGES DRAHER LLC
         7034 Braucher Street NW, Suite B
         North Canton, OH 44720
         Telephone: (330) 470-4428
         Facsimile: (330) 754-1430
         E-mail: hnilges@ohlaborlaw.com

                 - and -

         Matthew Coffman, Esq.
         COFFMAN LEGAL, LLC
         1550 Old Henderson Road, Suite 126
         Columbus, OH 43220
         Telephone: (614) 949-1181
         Facsimile: (614) 386-9964
         E-mail: mcoffman@mcoffmanlegal.com

DUTCH FREDS: Martin Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
---------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Dutch Freds, Inc. The
case is styled as Damian Martin, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Dutch Freds, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-06441 (E.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Dutch Fred's -- https://dutchfreds.com/ -- is a Hell's Kitchen
Local serving craft cocktails in midtown NYC, a cosy bar with a nod
to 1910s-style, decorated with mosaic tile floors.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


ELMWOOD VENTURES: Martin Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Elmwood Ventures,
LLC. The case is styled as Damian Martin, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated v. Elmwood Ventures, LLC, Case No.
1:23-cv-06440 (E.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Elmwood Ventures, LLC offers business consulting and services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


EMAGIN CORP: Continues to Defend Heckerman Class Suit in Delaware
-----------------------------------------------------------------
eMagin Corp. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2023 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 10, 2023, that the Company continues to defend
itself from the Heckerman class suit in the Delaware Court of
Chancery.

On July 14, 2023, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a
putative class action complaint against the Company, the Board,
Samsung Display, Silk USA, and Merger Sub in the Delaware Court of
Chancery, captioned Heckerman v. Wittels, et al. (Case No.
2023-0716).

The Heckerman Complaint alleges, on behalf of a putative class of
the Company's stockholders, among other things, claims for breach
of fiduciary duty against the Board with respect to the inclusion
of certain termination provisions in the Merger Agreement and with
respect to the process leading up to the Merger, and claims for
aiding and abetting such alleged breaches of fiduciary duty against
Samsung Display.

The Heckerman Complaint seeks, among other things, an injunction
enjoining the consummation of the Merger or the enforcement of
certain provisions of the Merger Agreement, or, in the event the
Merger is consummated, to recover damages resulting from
defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and/or aiding and
abetting of breaches of fiduciary duty.

The Company cannot predict the outcome of the Heckerman Action.

The Company believes that the Heckerman Action is without merit,
and the Company and the individual defendants intend to vigorously
defend against the Heckerman Action.

eMagin Corporation is a Foreign corporation that manufactures
field emitter devices and organic light emitting diodes.



ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS: Fails to Properly Pay Car Detailers, Odam Says
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MICHAEL ODAM, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC., ENTERPRISE
RENT-A-CAR, ELRAC, LLC, ALAMO RENTAL (US) LLC, and NATIONAL RENTAL
(US) LLC, Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-07358 (S.D.N.Y., August 18,
2023) is a class action against the Defendants for violations of
the New York Labor Law including failure to pay timely wages,
failure to provide wage notice, failure to reimburse uniform
purchase maintenance costs, and failure to pay spread-of-hours
compensation.

Mr. Odam worked for the Defendants as a car detailer in a parking
garage at 313 W. 56th Street, New York, New York from on or around
February 28, 2019 until around March 20, 2023.

Enterprise Holdings, Inc. is a car rental company doing business in
New York.

Enterprise Rent-A-Car is a car rental company headquartered in
Saint Louis, Missouri.

ELRAC, LLC is a car rental company located in New Jersey.

Alamo Rental (US) LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Enterprise
Holdings, Inc. based in New York, New York.

National Rental (US) LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Enterprise
Holdings, Inc. based in New York, New York. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Mohammed Gangat, Esq.
         LAW OFFICE OF MOHAMMED GANGAT
         675 Third Avenue, Suite 1810
         New York, NY 10017
         Telephone: (718) 669-0714
         E-mail: mgangat@gangatpllc.com

EP GLOBAL: Minnich Sues Over Disclosure of Info to Unknown Parties
------------------------------------------------------------------
VICTORIA MINNICH, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. EP GLOBAL PRODUCTION SOLUTIONS,
LLC D/B/A ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, Defendant, Case No. 5:23-cv-01696
(C.D. Cal., August 21, 2023) is a class action against the
Defendant for negligence, unjust enrichment, breach of third-party
beneficiary contract, and violations of the California Customer
Records Act.

The case arises from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and
safeguard the personally identifiable information of the Plaintiff
and similarly situated customers stored within its network systems
following a data breach detected on June 30, 2023. The Defendant
also failed to timely notify the Plaintiff and similarly situated
individuals about the data breach. As a result, the PII of the
Plaintiff and Class members were compromised and damaged through
access by and disclosure to unknown and unauthorized third parties,
the suit alleges.

EP Global Production Solutions, LLC, doing business as
Entertainment Partners, is a business services company based in
Burbank California. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         John J. Nelson, Esq.
         MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, LLC
         280 S. Beverly Drive
         Beverly Hills, CA 90212
         Telephone: (858) 209-6941
         E-mail: jnelson@milberg.com

                 - and -

         William B. Federman, Esq.
         FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD
         10205 N. Pennsylvania Ave.
         Oklahoma City, OK 73120
         Telephone: (405) 235-1560
         E-mail: wbf@federmanlaw.com

ERNST LICHT EMBROIDERY: Jones Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ernst Licht
Embroidery and Imports, Inc. The case is styled as Damon Jones, on
behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Ernst Licht
Embroidery and Imports, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-07616 (S.D.N.Y.,
Aug. 28, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Ernst Licht is a clothing store that sells jewelry, costumes, and
tie accessories for men and women.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          10826 64th Avenue, Ste. 2nd Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


ESOTERIX INC: Lal Suit Removed to C.D. California
-------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Nayan Lal, on behalf of himself, and all
others similarly situated v. ESOTERIX, INC., a Delaware
corporation; LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No.
23STCV15800 was removed from the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of Los Angeles, to the United States District
Court for the Central District of California on Aug. 28, 2023, and
assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-07089.

The Complaint asserts the following causes of action: failure to
pay overtime wages; failure to pay minimum wages; failure to
provide meal periods; failure to provide rest periods; failure to
pay all wages upon termination; failure to provide accurate
itemized statements; and unfair competition in violation of
California Business and Professions Code. Additionally, Plaintiff
seeks attorneys' fees and various penalties under the California
Labor Code.[BN]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Eugene Ryu, Esq.
          Paul Suh, Esq.
          K&L GATES LLP
          10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 8th Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Phone: 310.553.5000
          Fax: 310.553.5001
          Email: Gene.Ryu@klgates.com
                Paul.Suh@klgates.com


FONTANA SPORTS: Jones Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fontana Sports
Specialties, Inc. The case is styled as Damon Jones, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated v. Fontana Sports
Specialties, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-07617 (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 28,
2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Fontana Sports Specialties, Inc. -- https://www.fontanasports.com/
-- is a Madison-based outdoor retailer with 6+ decades of offering
high quality equipment & clothing for travel sports.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          10826 64th Avenue, Ste. 2nd Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


GENERAL ARMY NAVY: Jones Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against General Army Navy
Surplus, Inc. The case is styled as Damon Jones, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated v. General Army Navy
Surplus, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-07619 (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 28, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

General Army Navy Surplus, Inc. -- https://www.generalarmynavy.com/
-- features a many surplus, military and outdoor items.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          10826 64th Avenue, Ste. 2nd Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


GLORYBEE FOODS: Dawson Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Glorybee Foods, Inc.
The case is styled as Lashawn Dawson, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Glorybee Foods, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-07612-GHW (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 28, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

GloryBee -- https://glorybee.com/ -- is your source for bulk honey,
Non-GMO canola oil, tapioca syrup, and more.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gabriel Levy, Esq.
          GABRIEL A. LEVY, P.C.
          1129 Northern Blvd., Suite 404
          Manhasset, NY 11030
          Phone: (516) 287-3458
          Email: glevy@glpcfirm.com

GOLDMAN SACHS: LifeStance IPO Securities Suit Ongoing
-----------------------------------------------------
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 3, 2023, that its subsidiary Goldman
Sachs and Co. (GS&Co.) is among the underwriters named as
defendants in a putative securities class action filed on August
10, 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
New York relating to LifeStance Health Group, Inc.'s (LifeStance)
approximately $828 million June 2021 initial public offering of
common stock.

In addition to the underwriters, the defendants include LifeStance
and certain of its officers and directors. GS&Co. underwrote
10,580,000 shares of common stock representing an aggregate
offering price of approximately $190 million. On December 19, 2022,
the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, and on April 10, 2023,
the defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint was denied.
On June 2, 2023, the plaintiffs moved for class certification.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together
with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a global financial
institution that delivers a broad range of financial services to a
large and diversified client base that includes corporations,
financial institutions, governments and individuals.


GOLDMAN SACHS: Oak Street IPO Securities Suit Ongoing
-----------------------------------------------------
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 3, 2023, that its subsidiary Goldman
Sachs and Co. (GS&Co.) is among the underwriters named as
defendants in an amended complaint for a putative securities class
action filed on May 25, 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois relating to Oak Street Health, Inc.'s
(Oak Street) $377 million August 2020 initial public offering, $298
million December 2020 secondary equity offering, $691 million
February 2021 secondary equity offering and $747 million May 2021
secondary equity offering.

In addition to the underwriters, the defendants include Oak Street,
certain of its officers and directors and certain of its
shareholders. GS&Co. underwrote 4,157,103 shares of common stock in
the August 2020 initial public offering representing an aggregate
offering price of approximately $87 million, 1,503,944 shares of
common stock in the December 2020 secondary equity offering
representing an aggregate offering price of approximately $69
million, 3,083,098 shares of common stock in the February 2021
secondary equity offering representing an aggregate offering price
of approximately $173 million and 3,013,065 shares of common stock
in the May 2021 secondary equity offering representing an aggregate
offering price of approximately $187 million.

On February 10, 2023, the court granted in part and denied in part
the defendants' motion to dismiss, dismissing the claim alleging a
violation of Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act and, with
respect to the May 2021 secondary equity offering only, the claim
alleging a violation of Section 11 of the Securities Act, but
declining to dismiss the remaining claims.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together
with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a global financial
institution that delivers a broad range of financial services to a
large and diversified client base that includes corporations,
financial institutions, governments and individuals.


GOLDMAN SACHS: ON24 IPO Securities Suit Ongoing
-----------------------------------------------
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 3, 2023, that its subsidiary Goldman
Sachs and Co. (GS&Co.) is among the underwriters named as
defendants in a putative securities class action filed on November
3, 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California relating to ON24, Inc.'s (ON24) approximately $492
million February 2021 initial public offering of common stock.

In addition to the underwriters, the defendants include ON24 and
certain of its officers and directors, including a director who was
a Managing Director of GS&Co. at the time of the initial public
offering. GS&Co. underwrote 3,616,785 shares of common stock
representing an aggregate offering price of approximately $181
million. On March 18, 2022, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated
complaint, and on July 7, 2023, the court granted the defendants'
motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint with leave to amend.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together
with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a global financial
institution that delivers a broad range of financial services to a
large and diversified client base that includes corporations,
financial institutions, governments and individuals.


GOLDMAN SACHS: Opendoor Tech IPO Securities Suit Ongoing
--------------------------------------------------------
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 3, 2023, that its subsidiary Goldman
Sachs and Co. (GS&Co.) is among the underwriters named as
defendants in a putative securities class action filed on November
22, 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
relating to, among other things, Opendoor Technologies Inc.'s
approximately $886 million February 2021 public offering of common
stock.

In addition to the underwriters, the defendants include Opendoor
and certain of its officers and directors. GS&Co. underwrote
10,173,401 shares of common stock representing an aggregate
offering price of approximately $275 million. On April 17, 2023,
the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint, and on June
30, 2023, the defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated amended
complaint.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together
with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a global financial
institution that delivers a broad range of financial services to a
large and diversified client base that includes corporations,
financial institutions, governments and individuals.


GOLDMAN SACHS: Oscar Health IPO Securities Suit Ongoing
-------------------------------------------------------
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2023, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 3, 2023, that its subsidiary Goldman
Sachs and Co. (GS&Co.) is among the underwriters named as
defendants in a putative securities class action filed on May 12,
2022 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York relating to Oscar Health, Inc.'s (Oscar Health) approximately
$1.4 billion March 2021 initial public offering.

In addition to the underwriters, the defendants include Oscar
Health and certain of its officers and directors. GS&Co. underwrote
12,760,633 shares of common stock representing an aggregate
offering price of approximately $498 million. On December 5, 2022,
the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On April 4, 2023, the
defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together
with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a global financial
institution that delivers a broad range of financial services to a
large and diversified client base that includes corporations,
financial institutions, governments and individuals.


GRAND SLAM NEW YORK: Martin Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Grand Slam New York,
LLC. The case is styled as Damian Martin, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated v. Grand Slam New York, LLC, Case No.
1:23-cv-06443-AMD-SJB (E.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Grand Slam New York -- https://www.grandslamnewyork.com/ -- is
known for the largest selection of New York City souvenirs,
apparel, licensed gifts, and licensed sports products, at the
absolute lowest prices.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


GSRH WINGS: Fails to Provide Predictability Pay, Simms Suit Alleges
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Simms, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, v. GSRH Wings PA, LLC d/b/a Wingstop, Case No. 230802072
(Pa. Com. Pl., Philadelphia Cty., Aug. 18, 2023) alleges that GSRH
failed to provide employees with Predictability Pay when changing
their work schedules with less than 14-days' notice and alleges
that GSRH failed to post work schedules on-site in conspicuous and
accessible locations; offer available work shifts to existing
employees before hiring new employees; and provide new hires with
compliant, written, good faith estimates of their typical work
schedules, in violation of the Philadelphia Fair Workweek
Employment Standards.

GSRH hired the Plaintiff as a cook and he was eventually assigned
to be a "paratrooper." Throughout his employment, the Plaintiff's
schedule changed weekly, which made it difficult for him to find
transportation to work. On some occasions, GSRH required the
Plaintiff to remain at work long past his scheduled shifts (more
than 20 minutes) without any prior notice and without obtaining
written consent. GSRH also reduced the Plaintiff's hours at least
once by more than 20 minutes without providing him 14-days' advance
notice, the suit claims. Although GSRH often changed the
Plaintiff's schedule without 14-days' notice, after the Plaintiff
worked the new or changed shifts, GSRH never provided him with
Predictability Pay as required by the Fair Workweek Law, says the
suit.

As a result of GSRH's alleged violations of Section 9-4602(1) of
the Fair Workweek Law, the Plaintiff and the Class have been
deprived of a predictable schedule and are entitled to: an order
directing compliance; unpaid compensation; $200 in presumed
damages; liquidated damages up to $2,000; and reasonable attorney's
fees and costs.

The Plaintiff was employed as a non-exempt hourly employee at the
GSRH Wings PA located at 5305 Chew Avenue in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, from December 2022 through approximately May 2023.

GSRH is a food services establishment.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ryan Allen Hancock, Esq.
          WILLIG, WILLIAMS & DAVIDSON
          1845 Walnut Street, 24th Floor
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Telephone: (215) 656-3679
          E-mail: rhancock@wwdlaw.com

                - and -

          Sally J. Abrahamson, Esq.
          WERMAN SALAS P.C.
          335 18th Pl. NE
          Washington, DC 20002
          Telephone: (202) 830-2016
          E-mail: sabrahamson@flsalaw.com

                - and -

          Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen, Esq.
          Krysten Connon, Esq.
          LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
          729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
          Boston, MA 02116
          Telephone: (267) 256-9973
          E-mail: ssb@llrlaw.com
                  kconnon@llrlaw.com

HARTER'S FOX: Soto Sues Over Drivers/Parts Managers' Unpaid Wages
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MIRANDA SOTO-RIOS, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. HARTER'S FOX VALLEY DISPOSAL LLC,
Defendant, Case No. 1:23-cv-01107-WCG (E.D. Wis., August 22, 2023)
is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to pay
overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
and the Wisconsin's Wage Payment and Collection Laws.

The Plaintiff was hired as an hourly-paid, non-exempt employee in
the position of Residential Driver/Parts Manager since
approximately January 2023.

Harter's Fox Valley Disposal LLC is a waste management service
company, with a principal office address located at 169901 Ringle
Avenue, Wisconsin. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         James A. Walcheske, Esq.
         Scott S. Luzi, Esq.
         David M. Potteiger, Esq.
         WALCHESKE & LUZI, LLC
         235 N. Executive Drive, Suite 240
         Brookfield, WI 53005
         Telephone: (262) 780-1953
         Facsimile: (262) 565-6469
         E-mail: jwalcheske@walcheskeluzi.com
                 sluzi@walcheskeluzi.com
                 dpotteiger@walcheskeluzi.com

HUB INTERNATIONAL: Roy Sues Over Failure to Secure Information
--------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Roy, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. HUB INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Case No. 1:23-cv-06299 (N.D.
Ill., Aug. 28, 2023), is brought against the Defendant for its
failure to properly secure and safeguard the Plaintiff's and over
479,000 similarly situated individuals' names, driver's license
numbers, social security numbers, and financial account information
(the "Private Information") from hackers.

On July 27, 2023, HUB filed official notice of a hacking incident
with the office of the Maine Attorney General. On August 11, 2023,
HUB also sent out data breach notice letters (the "Notice") to
individuals whose information was compromised as a result of the
hacking incident. Based on information provided in the Notice sent
to impacted individuals, HUB detected unusual activity on some of
its computer systems in or around January 17, 2023.

In response, the company isolated the impacted systems and launched
an investigation which revealed that an unauthorized party had
access to certain company files between December 12, 2022, and
January 17, 2023 (the "Data Breach"). Yet, HUB waited over six
months to notify the public that they were at risk. As a result of
this delayed response, Plaintiff and "Class Members"  had no idea
for over six months that their Private Information had been
impacted, and that they were, and continue to be, at significant
risk of identity theft and various other forms of personal, social,
and financial harm. This risk will remain for their respective
lifetimes.

There has been no assurance offered by HUB that all personal data
or copies of data have been recovered or destroyed, or that
Defendant has adequately enhanced its data security practices
sufficient to avoid a similar breach of its network in the future.
Therefore, Plaintiff and Class Members have suffered and are at an
imminent, immediate, and continuing increased risk of suffering
ascertainable losses in the form of harm from identity theft and
other fraudulent misuse of their Private Information, out-of-pocket
expenses incurred to remedy or mitigate the effects of the Data
Breach, and the value of their time reasonably incurred to remedy
or mitigate the effects of the Data Breach, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff is an individual citizen of the State of
Massachusetts who received the Notice from Defendant.

HUB, based in Chicago, Illinois, is an insurance brokerage that
serves more than 450,000 customers throughout the United States and
internationally.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mason A. Barney, Esq.
          Tyler J. Bean, Esq.
          SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP
          745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500
          New York, NY 10151
          Phone: (212) 532-1091
          Email: mbarney@sirillp.com
                 tbean@sirillp.com

HUMANA INC: Herrera ADA Suit Removed to D. New Jersey
-----------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Carlos Herrera, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Humana, Inc., Case No. HUD-L-002669-23
was removed from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County,
to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on Aug.
28, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-11948 to the
proceeding.

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Humana Inc. -- https://www.humana.com/ -- is a for-profit American
health insurance company based in Louisville, Kentucky.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.

The Defendant is represented by:

          Amanda Lyn Genovese, Esq.
          SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
          620 Eighth Avenue
          New York, NY 10018
          Phone: (212) 218-5621
          Email: agenovese@seyfarth.com


INNOVATIVE WAREHOUSING: Sanchez Sues Over Unpaid Compensations
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ivonne Sanchez, on behalf of herself and current and former
aggrieved employees v. INNOVATIVE WAREHOUSING SOLUTIONS, LLC; and
DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Case No. 23STCV20736 (Cal. Super. Ct.,
Los Angeles Cty., Aug. 29, 2023), is brought against the
Defendants' violation of the Labor Code based on Defendants'
failure to pay proper minimum and overtime compensations.

The Defendants' failed to pay wages for all hours worked at minimum
wage and all overtime hours worked at the overtime rate of pay;
failed to authorize or permit all legally required and/or compliant
periods or pay meal period premium wages; failed to authorize or
permit all legally required and/or compliant rest periods or pay
rest period premium wages; failed to timely produce requested
employment records; statutory penalties for failing to timely pay
earned wages during employment; failed to provide accurate wage
statements. The Plaintiff also seek statutory waiting time
penalties in the form of continuation wages for failure to timely
pay employees all wages due upon separation of employment;
injunctive relief and other equitable relief, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff is a former employee of the Defendants.

INNOVATIVE WAREHOUSING SOLUTIONS, LLC is authorized to do business
within the State of California.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Joseph Lavi, Esq.
          Vincent C. Granberry, Esq.
          Cassandra A. Castro, Esq.
          LAVI & EBRAHIMIAN, LLP
          8889 W Olympic Blvd., Ste. 200
          Beverly Hills, CA 90211-3638
          Phone: 310-432-0000
          Fax: 310-432-0001
          Email: jlavi@lelawfirm.com
                 vgranberry@lelawfirm.com
                 ccastro@lelawfirm.com
                 WHT2@lelawfirm.com


J. CREW GROUP: Wiretaps Email Recipients' Communications, Muto Says
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MARCELO MUTO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. J. CREW GROUP, LLC, Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-07429 (S.D.N.Y., August 22, 2023) is a class action against
the Defendant for statutory larceny and violations of the
California Invasion of Privacy Act and the California Unfair
Competition Law.

The case arises from the Defendant's practice of aiding, agreeing
with, employing, or otherwise enabling the wiretapping of
electronic communications between the Defendant and its clients via
emails sent from the Defendant's email domain. The wiretaps, which
are embedded in the emails, operate without the knowledge or
consent of the Defendant's email recipients. As a result of the
Defendant's unfair and/or unlawful practices, the Plaintiff and
Class members have suffered an injury in fact, including the loss
of money and/or property, says the suit.

J. Crew Group, LLC is a provider of apparel products, with its
principal place of business 225 Liberty St., New York, New York.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Joseph. I Marchese, Esq.
         Alec M. Leslie, Esq.
         BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
         New York, NY 10019
         Telephone: (646) 837-7150
         Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
         E-mail: jmarchese@bursor.com
                 aleslie@bursor.com

                 - and -

         Adrian Gucovschi, Esq.
         GUCOVSCHI ROZENSHTEYN, PLLC
         140 Broadway, Suite 4667
         New York, NY 10005
         Telephone: (212) 884-4230
         Facsimile: (212) 884-4230
         E-mail: adrian@gr-firm.com

JPAY LLC: Bibbs Files Suit in S.D. Ohio
---------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against JPAY, L.L.C. The case
is styled as Nathaniel Bibbs, Ronald Leaks, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. JPAY, L.L.C., Steven
Abdul-Azziz El Bey also known as: Steven L. Smith, Case No.
2:23-cv-02792-SDM-KAJ (S.D. Ohio, Aug. 29, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Prisoner Civil Rights.

JPay -- https://www.jpay.com/ -- offers convenient & affordable
correctional services, including money transfer, email, videos,
tablets, music, education & parole and probation.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL: Gonzales Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kemron Environmental
Services, Inc., et al. The case is styled as David Gonzales, Marty
Edward Herrera, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Kemron Environmental Services, Inc., Does 1 Through 10,
Inclusive, Case No. CGC23608698 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco
Cty., Aug. 29, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Other Non-Exempt Complaints."

KEMRON Environmental Services -- https://www.kemron.com/ -- is an
environmental services company providing project management
services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Justin F. Marquez, Esq.
          WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, PLC
          3055 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 510
          Los Angeles, CA 90010-1145
          Phone: 213-381-9988
          Fax: 213-381-9989
          Email: justin@wilshirelawfirm.com


KONARK ENTERPRISES: Mahadev Sues Over Unpaid Minimum, Overtime Wage
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Vijay Sourab Singh Seetaram Mahadev, on behalf of himself and other
similarly situated v. KONARK ENTERPRISES LLC d/b/a GOLCONDA
CHIMNEY, KONARK II ENTERPRISES, LLC d/b/a MANTRA, VASU
VISHWANADHULA, and FAROOQ MOHAMMED, Case No. 2:23-cv-11838 (D.N.J.,
Aug. 28, 2023), is brought alleging violations of the Fair Labor
Standards Act ("FLSA"), the New Jersey State Wage Payment Law
("NJSWPL"), and the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law and Regulations
("NJWHLR"), (collectively, the "Labor Laws") arising from
Defendants' failure to pay non-exempt employees at the statutory
minimum wage rate and the statutory overtime rate of time and
one-half for all hours worked over 40 hours per workweek.

The Defendants have willfully and intentionally committed
widespread violations of the Labor Laws by engaging in a pattern
and practice of failing to pay its employees, including Plaintiff,
inter alia, minimum wages and overtime compensation at the
statutory rate of time and one-half for all hours worked above 40
hours in a workweek.

Throughout his employment, Plaintiff was not paid proper minimum
wages or overtime compensation. Throughout his employment,
Plaintiff was paid, in cash at the rate of $100 per day ($600 per
week) straight time for all hours worked and worked between 63 and
66 hours per week. Work performed above 40 hours per week was not
paid at the statutory rate of time and one-half as required by
state and federal law, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff worked for the Defendants until in or about January
2022.

KONARK ENTERPRISES LLC, owns and operates an Indian restaurant,
doing business as Golconda Chimney.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Giustino (Justin) Cilenti, Esq.
          CILENTI & COOPER, PLLC
          60 East 42nd Street – 40th Floor
          New York, NY 10165
          Phone: (212) 209-3933
          Fax: (212) 209-7102
          Email: info@jcpclaw.com


LA LA LEAF LLC: Luis Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against La La Leaf LLC. The
case is styled as Kevin Yan Luis, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. La La Leaf LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-07656
(S.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

La La Leaf -- https://lalaleaf.com/ -- offers natural skin care and
beauty products, including our popular lip balms.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noor Abou-Saab, I, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF NOOR A. SAAB
          380 North Broadway, Suite 300
          Jericho, NY 11753
          Phone: (718) 740-5060
          Email: noorasaablaw@gmail.com


LA-Z BOY INCORPORATED: Lanicek Files TCPA Suit in E.D. Michigan
---------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against La-Z Boy
Incorporated. The case is styled as Julie Lanicek, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated v. La-Z Boy
Incorporated, Case No. 2:23-cv-12203-MFL-DRG (E.D. Mich., Aug. 28,
2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.

La-Z-Boy Inc. -- https://www.la-z-boy.com/index.jsp -- is an
American furniture manufacturer based in Monroe, Michigan, United
States, that makes home furniture, including upholstered recliners,
sofas, stationary chairs, lift chairs and sleeper sofas.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Andrew Shamis, Esq.
          SHAMIS & GENTILE, PA
          14 Ne 1st Ave, Suite 1205
          Miami, FL 33132
          Phone: (305) 479-2299
          Email: ashamis@shamisgentile.com


LESLIE'S POOLMART: Fails to Timely Pay Wages, Patterson Suit Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ROJUAN PATTERSON, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. LESLIE'S POOLMART, INC.,
Defendant, Case No. 613514/2023 (N.Y. Sup., Nassau Cty., August 22,
2023) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to
pay timely wages in violation of the New York Labor Law.

Mr. Patterson was employed by the Defendant as an hourly worker at
Leslie's Poolmart from January 2020 until May 2020.

Leslie's Poolmart, Inc. is a retail company, headquartered in
Phoenix, Arizona. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Brian S. Schaffer, Esq.
         David J. Sack, Esq.
         FITAPELLI & SCHAFFER, LLP
         28 Liberty Street, 30th Floor
         New York, NY 10005
         Telephone: (212) 300-0375

LIVE VENTURES: Continues to Defend Sanchez Labor-Related Class Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Ventures Incorporated disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for
the quarterly period ending June 30, 2023 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 10, 2023, that the Company
continues to defend itself from the Sanchez labor-related class
suit.

On July 27, 2022, Irma Sanchez, a former employee of Elite Builder
Services, Inc. ("Elite Builders"), filed a class action complaint
against Elite Builders in the Superior Court of California, County
of Alameda. The complaint alleges that Elite Builders failed to pay
all minimum and overtime wages, failed to provide lawful meal
periods and rest breaks, failed to provide accurate itemized wage
statements, and failed to pay all wages due upon separation as
required by California law.

The complaint was later amended as a matter of right on October 4,
2022.

Further, Ms. Sanchez has put the Labor & Workforce Development
Agency on notice to exhaust administrative remedies and enable her
to bring an additional claim under the California Labor Code
Private Attorneys General Act, which permits an employee to assert
a claim for violations of certain California Labor Code provisions
on behalf of all aggrieved employees to recover statutory
penalties.

A Motion for Change of Venue to Stanislaus County was filed by
Elite Builders on December 7, 2022.

The hearing on the motion was heard on February 8, 2023 and the
motion was granted.

The Company believes that Ms. Sanchez’s claims lack merit and
intends to defend this action vigorously.

Live Ventures Incorporated is a holding company with focus on
value-oriented acquisitions of domestic middle-market companies
based in Nevada.


LIVE VENTURES: Continues to Defend Sieggreen Class Suit in Nevada
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Live Ventures Incorporated disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for
the quarterly period ending June 30, 2023 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 10, 2023, that the Company
continues to defend itself from the Sieggreen class suit in the
United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

On August 13, 2021, Daniel E. Sieggreen, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated claimants ("Plaintiff"), filed a
class action complaint for violation of federal securities laws in
the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, naming
the Company, Jon Isaac, the Company's current President and Chief
Executive Officer, and Virland Johnson, the Company's former Chief
Financial Officer, as defendants (collectively, the "Company
Defendants").

The allegations asserted are similar to those in the SEC Complaint.
Among other sought relief, the complaint seeks damages in
connection with the purchases and sales of the Company’s
securities between December 28, 2016 and August 3, 2021. As of
December 17, 2021, the judge granted a stipulation to stay
proceedings pending the resolutions of the motions to dismiss in
the SEC Complaint.

On February 1, 2023, the final motion to dismiss relating to the
SEC Complaint was denied, which was subsequently noticed in the
Sieggreen action on February 2, 2023.

Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on March 6, 2023.

On May 5, 2023, the Company Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss
the Amended Complaint, and the briefing on that motion is now
complete.

Discovery is automatically stayed in this case until after the
disposition of the Motion to Dismiss.

If the Motion to Dismiss is not successful, the case will proceed
to discovery.

The Company Defendants strongly dispute and deny the allegations at
issue in this case and intend to continue to defend themselves
vigorously against these claims.

Live Ventures Incorporated is a holding company with focus on
value-oriented acquisitions of domestic middle-market companies
based in Nevada.

LTA AIR LINES: McCauley Suit Removed to C.D. California
-------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Wilfred McCauley, individually, and on behalf
of all others similarly situated current and former employees v.
DELTA AIR LINES, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through
50, inclusive, Case No. 23STCV11527 was removed from the Superior
Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, to the
United States District Court for the Central District of California
on Aug. 28, 2023, and assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-07079.

The Complaint alleges five causes of action: failure to provide
meal periods in violation of Labor Code; failure to provide rest
periods in violation of Labor Code; failure to provide accurate,
itemized wage statements in violation of Labor Code; failure to
timely pay all final wages at termination in violation of Labor
Code; and unfair business practices in violation of Business &
Professions Code.[BN]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Carrie S. Gonell, Esq.
          MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
          600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1800
          Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7653
          Phone: +1.714.830.0600
          Fax: +1.714.830.0700
          Email: carrie.gonell@morganlewis.com

               - and -

          Andrew P. Frederick, Esq.
          MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
          1400 Page Mill Road
          Palo Alto, CA 94304
          Phone: +1.650.843.4000
          Fax: +1.650.843.4001
          Email: andrew.frederick@morganlewis.com

               - and -

          Nicole L. Antonopoulos, Esq.
          MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
          One Market, Spear Street Tower
          San Francisco, CA 94105-1596
          Phone: +1.415.442.1000
          Fax: +1.415.442.1001
          Email: nicole.antonopoulos@morganlewis.com


LUTHER BURBAN: Continues to Defend Siegel Class Suit in California
------------------------------------------------------------------
Luther Burbank Corporation disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for
the quarterly period ending June 30, 2023 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2023, that the Company
continues to defend itself from the Siegel class suit in the
Superior Court for the County of Sonoma, California.

On March 24, 2023, Martin Siegel, a purported Luther Burbank
Corporation shareholder, filed and served a putative class action
on behalf of the Company's shareholders in the Superior Court for
the County of Sonoma, California captioned Siegel v. Lagomarsino,
et al. (Case No. SCV-272922).

The Siegel complaint alleges that its board of directors breached
their fiduciary duty by failing to disclose certain internal
projections and other information allegedly underlying the fairness
opinion of our financial adviser, Piper Sandler & Co., in
connection with its pending merger transaction with Washington
Federal, Inc. Following the filing of our Current Report on Form
8-K on April 10, 2023 containing certain supplemental information
regarding unaudited prospective financial estimates received and
considered by Piper Sandler & Co., Mr. Siegel withdrew his request
for a preliminary injunction to require us to disclose the internal
projections and other information and to delay its May 4, 2023
shareholders meeting, but reserved the right to seek an award of
attorney's fees and expenses.

On May 9, 2023, Siegel and his counsel filed an amended complaint
alleging unjust enrichment and seeking an award of attorney's fees
and expenses and removing their prior disclosure based claims.

In addition, two other purported Luther Burbank Corporation
shareholders have filed similar actions in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging
violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended in
matters captioned Wang v. Luther Burbank Corporation, et al. (Civil
Action No. 23-cv-01949) and O’Dell v. Luther Burbank Corporation,
et al. (Civil Action No. 23-cv-1912), and one other purported
Luther Burbank Corporation shareholder has filed a similar action
in the Superior Court for the County of Sonoma, California
captioned Coffman v. Luther Burbank Corporation, et al. (Case No.
SCV-273074).

None of the plaintiffs have taken any action to serve these actions
or otherwise prosecute their claims.

The Company believes the allegations and claims in the Siegel
action and the other complaints are without merit.

Luther Burbank Corporation is a bank holding company headquartered
in Santa Rosa, California. LBC operates primarily through its
wholly owned subsidiary, Luther Burbank Savings, a California
banking corporation.






MADISON REED: Heeren Files TCPA Suit in N.D. Illinois
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Madison Reed, Inc.
The case is styled as Courtney Heeren, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated v. Madison Reed, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-06424 (N.D. Ill., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.

Madison Reed -- https://www.madison-reed.com/ -- is an American
brand of hair care and hair color products.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Andrew Shamis, Esq.
          SHAMIS & GENTILE, PA
          14 Ne 1st Ave, Suite 1205
          Miami, FL 33132
          Phone: (305) 479-2299
          Email: ashamis@shamisgentile.com


MATTIS PROPERTIES: Wagner Sues Over Disabled's Access to Stores
---------------------------------------------------------------
RICHARD WAGNER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. MATTIS PROPERTIES, LLC and UNITED DAIRY
FARMERS, INC., Defendants, Case No. 2:23-cv-02650-SDM-KAJ (S.D.
Ohio, August 21, 2023) is a class action against the Defendants for
violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Ohio
Disability Discrimination Law.

According to the complaint, the Defendants have discriminated, and
continue to discriminate, against the Plaintiff and similarly
situated people with disabilities by failing, inter alia, to have
accessible facilities. The accessibility issues at the Defendants'
facilities include, but not limited to: (a) parking lots and
accessible routes and (b) United Dairy Farmers (UDF) convenience
store & restrooms. Furthermore, the Defendants continue to
discriminate against the Plaintiff and Class members by failing to
make reasonable modifications in policies, practices or procedures,
when such modifications are necessary to afford all offered goods,
services, facilities, privileges, advantages or accommodations to
individuals with disabilities; and by failing to take such efforts
that may be necessary to ensure that no individual with a
disability is excluded, denied services, segregated or otherwise
treated differently than other individuals because of the absence
of auxiliary aids and services, the suit alleges.

Mattis Properties LLC is a shopping center operator located at 9665
Sawmill Rd. Powell, Ohio.

United Dairy Farmers Inc. is the operator of a business called
United Dairy Farmers, located at 9665 Sawmill Rd. Powell, Ohio.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Owen B. Dunn, Jr., Esq.
         LAW OFFICES OF OWEN DUNN, JR.
         The Offices of Unit C
         6800 W. Central Ave., Suite C-1
         Toledo, OH 43617
         Telephone: (419) 241-9661
         Facsimile: (419) 241-9737
         E-mail: dunnlawoffice@sbcglobal.net

MAXIMUS INC: Fails to Protect Patients' Personal Info, Wilt Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
LEO WILT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. MAXIMUS, INC., Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-01108-MSN-WEF (E.D. Va., August 21, 2023) is a class action
against the Defendant for negligence, negligence per se, unjust
enrichment, and breach of implied contract.

The case arises from the Defendant's failure to properly secure and
safeguard the personally identifiable information and protected
health information of the Plaintiff and similarly situated patients
stored within its network systems following a data breach from May
30 to May 31, 2023. The Defendant also failed to timely notify the
Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals about the data breach.
As a result, the PII and PHI of the Plaintiff and Class members
were compromised and damaged through access by and disclosure to
unknown and unauthorized third parties, the suit alleges.

Maximus, Inc. is a healthcare company, with its headquarters and
principal place of business located in Richmond, Virginia. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Steven T. Webster, Esq.
         WEBSTER BOOK LLP
         300 N. Washington St., Suite 404
         Alexandria, VA 22314
         Telephone: (888) 987-9991
         E-mail: swebster@websterbook.com

                 - and -

         John A. Yanchunis, Esq.
         Ra O. Amen, Esq.
         MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX LITIGATION GROUP
         201 North Franklin Street 7th Floor
         Tampa, FL 33602
         Telephone: (813) 223-5505
         Facsimile: (813) 223-5402
         E-mail: jyanchunis@forthepeople.com
                 ramen@forthepeople.com

MCKENDREE UNIVERSITY: Senior Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against McKendree University.
The case is styled as Milagros Senior, on behalf of herself and all
other persons similarly situated v. McKendree University, Case No.
1:23-cv-07687 (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

McKendree University -- https://www.mckendree.edu/ -- is a private
university in Lebanon, Illinois.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb, Esq.
          Dana Lauren Gottlieb, Esq.
          GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
          150 E. 18 St., Suite PHR
          New York, NY 10003
          Phone: (917) 796-7437
          Fax: (212) 982-6284
          Email: nyjg@aol.com
                 danalgottlieb@aol.com


MELRIC SYSTEMS: Ortiz Seeks Unpaid Wages for Non-Exempt Workers
---------------------------------------------------------------
STEVEN ORTIZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. MELRIC SYSTEMS CORP. and FRANK MORISCO,
Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-06226 (E.D.N.Y., August 18, 2023) is a
class action against the Defendants for violations of the Fair
Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law including failure to
pay overtime wages, failure to pay spread-of-hours compensation,
failure to provide wage notice, and failure to provide wage
statements.

Mr. Ortiz worked for Melric Systems as a non-exempt employee from
1998 through April 2022.

Melric Systems Corp. is a waterproofing company in Huntington
Station, New York. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Brian L. Greben, Esq.
         LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN L. GREBEN
         316 Great Neck Road
         Great Neck, NY 11021
         Telephone: (516) 304‐5357

MISTER CAR WASH: Labor Class Suit Mediation Set for October 19
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mister Car Wash Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2023 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 4, 2023, that the mediation for
labor-related class suit is scheduled on October 19, 2023.

On February 14, 2023, a plaintiff filed a purported class action
lawsuit in the Stanislaus County Superior Court, California, on
behalf of all non-exempt employees employed by Defendants in
California any time between February 14, 2019, and the present,
against Prime Shine, LLC and Does 1 – 20 inclusive.

Plaintiff alleges eight claims for violations of the California
Labor Code and one claim for violation of the California Business &
Professions Code.

On June 13, 2023, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint to add
a claim for penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General
Act.

Plaintiff seeks, among other things, an unspecified amount for
unpaid wages, actual, consequential, and incidental losses,
penalties, and attorneys' fees and costs.

The parties agreed to an informal exchange of information in lieu
of formal discovery prior to mediation with an experienced
wage-and-hour mediator.

The mediation is currently scheduled for October 19, 2023.

Headquartered in Tucson, Arizona, Mister Car Wash is the largest
operator of car washes in North America, operating 360 car wash
locations across 23 U.S. states with LTM September 30, 2021
revenues of approximately $729 million.




MITCHELL GOLD: Price Sues Over Unpaid Wages and Benefits
--------------------------------------------------------
Lindsey Price, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated v. THE MITCHELL GOLD CO., LLC; Case No. 5:23-cv-00135
(W.D.N.C., Aug. 28, 2023), is brought for collection of unpaid
wages and benefits for 60 calendar days' pursuant to the Worker
Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (the "WARN
Act").

On August 25, 2023 and thereafter, Defendant ordered the
termination of Plaintiff's employment together with the termination
of approximately 700 other employees who worked at or reported to
the Facilities as part of a mass layoff and/or plant closing as
defined by the WARN Act, for which they were entitled to receive 60
days' advance written notice under the WARN Act. The Plaintiff was
an employee of Defendant until she was terminated as part of, or as
a result of a mass layoff and/or plant closing ordered by
Defendant. As such, Defendant is liable under the WARN Act for the
failure to provide Plaintiff and the other similarly situated
former employees at least 60 days' advance written notice of
termination, as required by the WARN Act, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant and worked at or
reported to the Taylorsville Facility.

The Defendant a North Carolina corporation which maintained
facilities throughout North Carolina.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          John F. Bloss, Esq.
          Jonathan Wall, Esq.
          HIGGINS BENJAMIN, PLLC
          301 N. Elm Street, Suite 800
          Greensboro, NC 27401
          Phone: (336) 273-1600
          Fax: (336) 274-4650
          Email: jbloss@greensborolaw.com
                 jwall@greensborolaw.com

               - and -

          Stuart J. Miller, Esq.
          LANKENAU & MILLER, LLP
          100 Church Street 8th FL
          New York, NY 10007
          Phone: (212) 581-5005

               - and -

          Mary E. Olsen, Esq.
          M. Vance McCrary, Esq.
          THE GARDNER FIRM, PC
          182 St. Francis Street, Suite 103
          Mobile, AL 36602
          Phone: (251) 433-8100
          Direct: (251) 415-4978
          Fax: (251) 433-8181


MONRO INC: Fails to Pay OT Wages Under FLSA, Wise Class Suit Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------------
KYLE WISE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
v. MONRO, INC, Case No. 6:23-cv-06476 (W.D. Ohio, Aug. 18, 2023)
sues the Defendant for failing to pay overtime, pursuant to the
Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards
Act (OMFWSA).

Specifically, the Defendant has a company-wide policy and practice
of not paying their hourly employees, including the Plaintiff and
others similarly situated, for all hours worked, resulting in
unpaid overtime, the Plaintiff asserts.

The Defendant has a company-wide policy and practice of deducting
30-minutes of unpaid lunch time, even though the Defendant knew
that hourly employees, including the Plaintiff and those similarly
situated, routinely worked through the entire 30-minute unpaid meal
break or were otherwise interrupted with work activities during the
unpaid breaks, says the suit.

The collective that the Plaintiff seeks to represent, and of which
Plaintiff is himself a member, is composed of and defined as
follows:

          All current and former hourly employees who were subject
          to the Defendant's unpaid lunch policy and who worked 40

          or more hours during a workweek at any time from three
          (3) years preceding the filing of this Complaint through

          final disposition of this matter.

The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and a class
of persons employed by the Defendant in Ohio defined as:

          All current and former hourly Ohio employees who were
          subject to the Defendant's unpaid lunch policy and who
          worked 40 or more hours during a workweek at any time
          from two (2) years preceding the filing of this Complaint

          through final disposition of this matter.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant from July 19, 2021
through July 3, 2023, as a non-exempt tech/assistant manager who
was paid on an hourly basis of approximately $16.00.

The Defendant owns and operates more than 1,300 auto repair shops
and tire dealers.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Hans A. Nilges, Esq.
          NILGES DRAHER LLC
          7034 Braucher Street NW, Suite B
          North Canton, OH 44720
          Telephone: (330) 470-4428
          Facsimile: (330) 754-1430
          E-mail: hans@ohlaborlaw.com

NATERA INC: Bid to Dismiss Securities Suit Pending in Texas Court
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Natera Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2023 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 3, 2023, that the Company's motion to dismiss
the Securities Act-related class suit is still pending in the
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

A purported class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and
certain of its management in the United States District Court for
the Western District of Texas, asserting claims under Sections
10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
thereunder.

The complaint, filed in April 2022 and amended in October 2022 (to
include, among others, the claims raised in the lawsuit discussed
in the preceding paragraph), alleges, among other things, that the
management defendants made materially false or misleading
statements, and/or omitted material information that was required
to be disclosed, about certain of the Company's products and
operations.

The complaint seeks, among other relief, monetary damages,
attorneys' fees, and costs.

The Company has filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit, which is
currently pending before the Court.

Natera is the global leader in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing,
dedicated to oncology, women's health, and organ health.[BN]


NCINO INC: Settlement Reached in Sherman Act-Related Suit
---------------------------------------------------------
nCino Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending July 31, 2023 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 29, 2023, that the Company agreed to settle a
Sherman Act-related class suit.

On March 12, 2021, a putative class action complaint was filed in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North
Carolina (the "District Court"). The sole class representative in
the suit is one individual alleging a contract, combination or
conspiracy between and among the Company, Live Oak Bancshares, Inc.
("Live Oak") and Apiture, Inc. ("Apiture") not to solicit or hire
each other’s employees in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman
Act and N.C. Gen Stat. §§ 75-1 and 75-2.

The complaint seeks treble damages and additional remedies,
including restitution, disgorgement, reasonable attorneys’ fees,
the costs of the suit, and pre-judgment and post judgment interest.


The complaint does not allege any specific damages.

On April 28, 2022, the District Court approved settlements between
the plaintiff and defendant Live Oak in the amount of approximately
$3.9 million and unnamed party Apiture in the amount of
approximately $0.8 million.

In July 2023, through mediation, the Company and the plaintiff
reached a settlement agreement in principle of approximately $2.2
million that remains subject to court approval.

While the Company strongly believes that it would prevail on the
merits and that it has not violated the antitrust laws, in order to
avoid the distraction and expense of protracted litigation and
instead continue to focus on its employees and customers, the
Company agreed to settle this matter.

The Company has accrued for the proposed settlement agreement which
is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities as of
July 31, 2023 on the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated
balance sheets.

nCino is a financial technology company.



PET FOOD WAREHOUSE: Cromitie Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Pet Food Warehouse,
LTD. The case is styled as Seana Cromitie, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated v. Pet Food Warehouse, LTD, Case No.
1:23-cv-07681 (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Pet Food Warehouse -- https://www.pfwvt.com/ -- offers best
supplies for pet groomer, dog breeders, horse owners &
veterinarians.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


PIER 39 LP: Watson Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against PIER 39, LP, et al.
The case is styled as Calvin Watson, individually, and on behalf of
other members of the general public similarly situated v. PIER 39,
LP, Does 1 Through 100, Inclusive, Case No. CGC23608701 (Cal.
Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., Aug. 29, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Other Non-Exempt Complaints."

Pier 39 -- https://www.pier39.com/ -- is a shopping center and
popular tourist attraction built on a pier in San Francisco,
California.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Arby Aiwazian, Esq.
          LAWYERS for JUSTICE, PC
          410 Arden Ave., Ste. 203
          Glendale, CA 91203-4007
          Phone: 818-265-1020
          Fax: 818-265-1021
          Email: arby@calljustice.com


PLAYSTUDIOS INC: Continues to Defend Felipe Suit in California
--------------------------------------------------------------
PlayStudios Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2023 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 4, 2023, that the Company continues
to defend itself from the Felipe class suit in the United States
District Court for the Northern District California.

On April 6, 2022, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United
States District Court, Northern District of California, by a
purported Company shareholder in connection with alleged federal
securities law violations: Christian A. Felipe et. al. v.
PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. (the "Felipe Complaint").

On July 15, 2022, the Felipe Complaint was transferred to the
United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Southern
Division.

On October 4, 2022, the plaintiffs filed an amendment to the Felipe
Complaint.

The Felipe Complaint names the Company, several current and former
board members of the Company, board members and officers of Acies
Acquisition Corp., and Andrew Pascal, the Company's Chairman and
CEO, as defendants.

The Felipe Complaint alleges misrepresentations and omissions
regarding the state of the Company's development of the Kingdom
Boss game and its financial projections and future prospects in the
S-4 Registration Statement filed by Acies that was declared
effective on May 25, 2021, the Proxy Statement filed by Acies on
May 25, 2021, and other public statements that touted Old
PLAYSTUDIOS’ and the Company's financial performance and
operations, including statements made on earnings calls and the
Amended S-1 Registration Statement filed by the Company that was
declared effective on July 30, 2021.

The Felipe Complaint alleges that the misrepresentations and
omissions resulted in stock price drops of 13% on August 12, 2021,
and 5% on February 25, 2022, following (i) the Company's release of
financial results for the second quarter of 2021, ended on June 30,
2021, and (ii) the filing of the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 and issuance of a press
release summarizing financial results for the fourth quarter and
year ended December 31, 2021, respectively.

The Felipe Complaint seeks an award of damages for an unspecified
amount.

The Company believes that the claims are without merit and the
Company intends to vigorously defend against them.

Playstudios, Inc. is a developer and publisher of free-to-play
casual games for mobile and social platforms, headquartered in Las
Vegas, Nevada. [BN]


POWER INNOVATIONS: Maxwell Sues Over Electricians' Unpaid Wages
---------------------------------------------------------------
JAMES MAXWELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. POWER INNOVATIONS, INC., KIMBERLY KELLY,
SCOTT KELLY, and ELEASHA PIONTEK, Defendants, Case No.
2:23-cv-01493-MRH (W.D. Pa., August 18, 2023) is a class action
against the Defendants for unpaid wages, specifically those that
were withheld to be deposited into a 401(k) retirement account,
along with reasonable returns on the unpaid wages pursuant to the
Wage Payment and Collection Law, the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act, and Pennsylvania Common
Law.

Mr. Maxwell began working for Power Innovations as an electrician
on January 15, 2023.

Power Innovations, Inc. is a provider of power management
solutions, located at 2725 Walnut Street, McKeesport, Pennsylvania.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Justin M. Bahorich, Esq.
         Joshua P. Ward, Esq.
         J.P. WARD AND ASSOCIATES, LLC
         The Rubicon Building
         201 South Highland Avenue, Suite 201
         Pittsburgh, PA 15206

POWERSCHOOL HOLDINGS: Collects Students' Private Info, Suit Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Q.J., a minor, through his parent and legal guardian, J.J.,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. POWERSCHOOL HOLDINGS LLC; HOBSONS, INC.; HEAP INC.;
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, commonly known as
CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS; UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES AND OFFICERS OF
POWERSCHOOL HOLDINGS LLC; UKNOWN EMPLOYEES AND OFFICERS OF HOBSONS,
INC.; and UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES AND OFFICERS OF HEAP INC., Defendants,
Case No. 1:23-cv-05689 (N.D. Ill., August 18, 2023) is a class
action against the Defendants for violations of the Fourth
Amendment, the California Invasion of Privacy Act, Stored
Communications Act, and the Illinois Eavesdropping Act, and for
intrusion upon seclusion, conspiracy to deprive constitutional
rights, policy and practice claim, breach of contract, negligence,
unjust enrichment, and respondeat superior.

According to the complaint, the Defendants routinely and
systematically violated the students' constitutional, statutory,
and common-law privacy rights by collecting and obtaining sensitive
and confidential personal information about students, including
education and school student records and the information contained
therein, through the Naviance, an education platform. Unbeknownst
to the Plaintiff and Class members, their actions, interactions,
data transmissions and communications while accessing and
navigating the Naviance platform were surreptitiously intercepted,
monitored, captured, and recorded by the Defendants, says the
suit.

Hobsons, Inc. is a software company based in Ohio.

PowerSchool Holdings LLC is a software company based in
California.

Heap Inc. is a digital insights platform, with its principal place
of business located in San Francisco, California.

Board of Education of the City of Chicago, commonly known as
Chicago Public Schools, is a body politic and corporate organized
under the laws of the State of Illinois with its principal place of
business located in Chicago, Illinois. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Scott R. Drury, Esq.
         DRURY LEGAL, LLC
         6 Carriage Lane
         Highwood, IL 60040
         Telephone: (312) 358-8225
         E-mail: scott@drurylegal.com

PRIMO HOME: Faces Montero Wage-and-Hour Suit in S.D.N.Y.
--------------------------------------------------------
BRYAN MONTERO and DAMIAND VILLA, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. PRIMO HOME SERVICES
INSTALLATION INC. and BRAULIO RODRIGUEZ, Defendants, Case No.
1:23-cv-07340 (S.D.N.Y., August 18, 2023) is a class action against
the Defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and
the New York Labor Law including failure to pay overtime wages,
failure to pay minimum wages, failure to provide wage notice, and
failure to provide wage statements.

Mr. Montero was employed by the Defendants from February 20, 2023
until May 15, 2023.

Mr. Villa was employed by the Defendants from April 2019 until
April 15, 2023.

Primo Home Services Installation Inc. is an installation services
provider, with a principal executive office in New York, New York.
[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                
      
         Janelle J Romero, Esq.
         GEN ESQ LAW PLLC
         515 Madison Avenue #8140
         New York, NY 10022
         Telephone: (201) 503-7754

RBS SHOE CORPORATION: Cromitie Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against RBS Shoe Corporation.
The case is styled as Seana Cromitie, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated v. RBS Shoe Corporation, Case No.
1:23-cv-07679 (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

RBS Shoe Corporation offers performance and sport-inspired
lifestyle products in categories such as football, running,
training and fitness, golf and motorsports.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


ROMAX GROUP: Garcia Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
---------------------------------------------------
Darwin Leobaldo Zapata Garcia, individually and on behalf of others
similarly situated v. ROMAX GROUP INC (D/B/A ROMAX), ROBERTO LOPEZ
GOMEZ, MAXIMILIANO LOPEZ GOMEZ, and LUZ DARY GOMEZ, Case No.
1:23-cv-06424 (E.D.N.Y., Aug. 28, 2023), is brought for unpaid
overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
("FLSA"), and for violations of the N.Y. Labor Law (the "NYLL"),
including applicable liquidated damages, interest, attorneys' fees
and costs

The Plaintiff worked for the Defendants in excess of 40 hours per
week, without appropriate overtime compensation for the hours that
he worked. Rather, the Defendants failed to maintain accurate
recordkeeping of the hours worked, and failed to pay the Plaintiff
appropriately for any hours worked, either at the straight rate of
pay or for any additional overtime premium. Furthermore, the
Defendants failed to pay the Plaintiff wages on a timely basis. In
this regard, Defendants have failed to provide timely wages to the
Plaintiff the Defendants' conduct extended beyond the Plaintiff to
all other similarly situated employees. The Defendants maintained a
policy and practice of requiring the Plaintiff and other employees
to work in excess of 40 hours per week without providing the
overtime compensation required by federal and state law and
regulations, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff was employed as a construction worker at the
construction corporation.

The Defendants owned, operated, or controlled a construction
corporation, located in Howard Beach, New York, under the name
"Romax."[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Catalina Sojo, Esq.
          CSM LEGAL, P.C.
          60 East 42nd Street, Suite 4510
          New York, NY 10165
          Phone: (212) 317-1200
          Facsimile: (212) 317-1620


S.E.S.A. FLEET: Faces Salinas Suit Over Unpaid Wages for Mechanics
------------------------------------------------------------------
SAUL SALINAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. S.E.S.A. FLEET SERVICES, LLC, Defendant,
Case No. 7:23-cv-00279 (S.D. Tex., August 22, 2023) is a class
action against the Defendant for failure to pay overtime wages in
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Pennsylvania
Minimum Wage Act and failure to pay all wages under the
Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Laws.

Mr. Salinas worked for SESA as a mechanic in Pennsylvania from
approximately November 2014 until May 2022.

S.E.S.A. Fleet Services, LLC is a provider of fleet maintenance
services, headquartered in Texas. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Michael A. Josephson, Esq.
         Andrew W. Dunlap, Esq.
         JOSEPHSON DUNLAP, LLP
         11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 3050
         Houston, TX 77046
         Telephone: (713) 352-1100
         Facsimile: (713) 352-3300
         E-mail: mjosephson@mybackwages.com
                 adunlap@mybackwages.com

                 - and -

         Richard J. (Rex) Burch, Esq.
         BRUCKNER BURCH, PLLC
         11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 3025
         Houston, TX 77046
         Telephone: (713) 877-8788
         E-mail: rburch@brucknerburch.com

SICKAFUS SHEEPSKINS: Jones Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sickafus Sheepskins,
Inc. The case is styled as Damon Jones, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated v. Sickafus Sheepskins, Inc., Case
No. 1:23-cv-07623 (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 28, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Sickafus Sheepskins, Inc. -- https://www.sickafus.com/ -- offers
beautiful, warm and cozy sheepskin coats, hats, slippers and
more.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          10826 64th Avenue, Ste. 2nd Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


STATE FARM: Miscalculates Insureds' COI Rates, Niewinski Alleges
----------------------------------------------------------------
LORIN NIEWINSKI, JOHN BAKER MCCLANAHAN, as personal representative
of THE ESTATE OF MELISSSA BUCHANAN, ROBERT A. BOZAICH, RONNIE
JACKSON, and SHERIF B. BOTROS, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY and STATE FARM LIFE AND ACCIDENT ASSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants, Case No. 2:23-cv-04159-BP (W.D. Mo., August 21, 2023)
is a class action against the Defendants for breach of contract,
breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion,
and declaratory and injunctive relief.

The case arises from the Defendants' practice of charging and
collecting fees from the Plaintiffs and other similarly situated
owners of life insurance policies in excess of amounts authorized
by the express terms of these policies. The Plaintiffs allege the
Defendants are contractually bound to deduct from the cash value
only those charges that are explicitly identified and authorized by
the terms of the policies, which are fully integrated agreements.
By calculating the Cost of Insurance (COI) rates in a manner that
violates the express terms of the policies, the Defendants cause
the Plaintiffs' and the Class members' cash values to be lower than
they otherwise would have been had the Defendants properly
determined the COI rates. The Plaintiffs, individually and on
behalf of members of the Class, seek to recover amounts they allege
the Defendants have wrongfully taken from them and other owners of
the policies across the United States.

State Farm Life Insurance Company is a life insurance company, with
its principal place of business in Bloomington, Illinois.

State Farm Life and Accident Assurance Company is a life insurance
company, with its principal place of business in Bloomington,
Illinois. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                
      
         Norman E. Siegel, Esq.
         Ethan M. Lange, Esq.
         STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP
         460 Nichols Road, Suite 200
         Kansas City, MO 64112
         Telephone: (816) 714-7100
         Facsimile: (816) 714-7101
         E-mail: siegel@stuevesiegel.com
                 lange@stuevesiegel.com

                 - and -

         John J. Schirger, Esq.
         Matthew W. Lytle, Esq.
         Joseph M. Feierabend, Esq.
         MILLER SCHIRGER, LLC
         4520 Main Street, Suite 1570
         Kansas City, MO 64111
         Telephone: (816) 561-6500
         Facsimile: (816) 561-6501
         E-mail: jschirger@millerschirger.com
                 mlytle@millerschirger.com
                 jfeierabend@millerschirger.com

                 - and -

         David M. Wilkerson, Esq.
         THE VAN WINKLE LAW FIRM
         11 N. Market Street
         Asheville, NC 28801
         Telephone: (828) 258-2991
         Facsimile: (828) 257-2767
         E-mail: dwilkerson@vwlawfirm.com

                 - and -

         Melinda R. Coolidge, Esq.
         Nathaniel C. Giddings, Esq.
         HAUSFELD LLP
         1700 K. Street, NW
         Washington, DC 20006
         Telephone: (202) 540-7200
         Facsimile: (202) 540-7201
         E-mail: mcoolidge@hausfeld.com
                 ngiddings@hausfeld.com

                 - and -

         Sophia Goren Gold, Esq.
         KALIEL GOLD PLLC
         950 Gilman St., Ste. 200
         Berkeley, CA 94710
         Telephone: (202) 350-4783
         E-mail: sgold@kalielpllc.com

STRENGTH20 LLC: Sanchez Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages for Security Guards
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOMAS SANCHEZ and TRENT BARKER, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. STRENGTH20 LLC and ROMMEL
A. ARIZA, Defendants, Case No. 2:23-cv-00655 (M.D. Fla., August 22,
2023) is a class action against the Defendants for failure to pay
minimum wages and overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act and for breach of contract and unjust enrichment.

The Plaintiffs worked as non-exempt hourly paid security guards
from October 2022 through November 2022.

Strength20, LLC is a limited liability company, with its principal
office in Polk County, Florida. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                
      
         Angeli Murthy, Esq.
         MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
         8151 Peters Rd., 4th Floor
         Plantation, FL 33324
         Telephone: (954) 318-0268
         Facsimile: (954) 327-3016
         E-mail: Amurthy@forthepeople.com

SUNRISE RESTAURANTS: Melgar Sues Over Unpaid Minimum Wages & Tips
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hansel Melgar, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Sunrise Restaurants, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability
company; and Roland Spongberg and Jane Doe Spongberg, a married
couple, Case No. 4:23-cv-00406-EJM (D. Ariz., Aug. 29, 2023), is
brought for unpaid minimum wages and tips, liquidated damages,
attorneys' fees, costs, and interest under the Fair Labor Standards
Act ("FLSA") on behalf of current and former employees of
Defendants who worked as tipped employees and whose tips were not
fully dispersed to them as required by the FLSA.

The Defendants have operated pursuant to a policy and practice of
intentionally not allowing Plaintiff and similarly situated
employees to retain all tips they earned as required by the FLSA.
Pursuant to this practice, Defendants have willfully failed or
refused to disperse to Plaintiff and similarly situated employees
to retain all tips earned as required by the FLSA. In willfully
failing or refusing to allow Plaintiff and similarly situated
employees to retain all tips earned as required by the FLSA,
Defendants have violated the minimum wage and tipped employee
provisions, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff was hired by the Defendants to work for them as a
server
at the Denny's restaurant in 2015.

The Defendants own, operate, or otherwise manage a chain of Denny's
restaurants with multiple locations company in the Tucson
Metropolitan Area.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Clifford P. Bendau, II, Esq.
          Christopher J. Bendau, Esq.
          BENDAU & BENDAU PLLC
          P.O. Box 97066
          Phoenix, AZ 85060
          Phone: (480) 382-5176
          Facsimile: (480) 304-3805
          Email: cliffordbendau@bendaulaw.com
                 chris@bendaulaw.com


SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: Williams Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Swords to Plowshares:
Veterans Rights Organization, et al. The case is styled as Phelicia
Williams, an individual, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all
persons similarly situated v. Swords to Plowshares: Veterans Rights
Organization, Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No. CGC23608674
(Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., Aug. 28, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Other Non-Exempt Complaints."

Swords to Plowshares -- https://www.swords-to-plowshares.org/ -- is
a Bay Area-based nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting all
veterans every step of the way.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Nicholas James Blouw, Esq.
          BLUMENTHAL NORDREHAUG BHOWMIK DE BLOUW
          2255 Calle Clara
          La Jolla, CA 92037-3107
          Phone: 858-952-0354
          Fax: 858-551-1232
          Email: DeBlouw@bamlawca.com


TEXAS GROUNDWORKS: Navarrete Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
------------------------------------------------------------
Jose Enrique Navarrete, individually and on behalf of others
similarly situated v. Texas Groundworks Management, Inc. and
Froylan Nino, Individually, Case 4:23-cv-03182 (S.D. Tex., Aug. 29,
2023), is brought against Defendants to recover unpaid overtime
that is required by the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").

The Defendants have a business plan that includes paying non-exempt
hourly employees the same hourly rate for all hours worked, even
those hours over 40 per workweek. In addition, Defendants do not
pay their workers for all the hours that they work. Defendants'
failure to pay for all hours worked and failure to pay the overtime
premium required by law allows them to gain an unfair advantage
over competitors who follow the law in their employment practices.

The Plaintiff is one of the workers hired by Defendants as an
hourly employee, not paid for all of his hours and not paid
overtime pay. Plaintiff regularly worked more than 40 hours per
week. The Defendants paid Navarrete on an hourly basis. Defendants
did not pay Navarrete an overtime premium for any of the hours he
worked over 40 in a workweek. Instead, Defendants paid Navarrete
the same hourly rate for all the hours he worked ("straight time").
In addition to being paid straight time for all hours, Defendants
did not pay Navarrete for all the hours he worked ("off-the
clock"), says the complaint.

The Plaintiff worked for the Defendants as a landscaping laborer
and supervisor from April of 2022 until July 31, 2023.

Texas Groundworks Management, Inc. is a Texas corporation.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Josef F. Buenker, Esq.
          THE BUENKER LAW FIRM
          P.O. Box 10099
          Houston, Texas 77206
          Phone: 713-868-3388
          Facsimile: 713-683-9940
          Email: jbuenker@buenkerlaw.com

TOTAL HOME: Mayancela Sues Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
-----------------------------------------------------
Christian Mayancela and John Ramirez, on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly situated v. TOTAL HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES
INC., KVL PAINTING SERVICES CORP., JOHN DOE CORPS., and JIMMY
ANDRADE, Case NO. 1:23-cv-07680 (S.D.N.Y, Aug. 29, 2023), is
brought to recover unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages,
statutory damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, and attorneys'
fees and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), the New
York Labor Law ("NYLL"), and the New York State Wage Theft
Prevention Act ("WTPA").

The Defendants misclassified Mayancela as an independent contractor
and Ramirez as a subcontractor's employee to avoid paying them
legally required overtime wages, even though the Plaintiffs
regularly worked over forty hours per workweek throughout their
respective employment periods. Defendants also failed to provide
Plaintiffs with accurate wage statements with each payment of their
wages, says the complaint.

The Plaintiffs are employed by the Defendants as carpenters and
painters.

Total Home Improvement Services Inc. is a "full-service, high end
general contractors and home builders in New York City."[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Louis Pechman, Esq.
          Gianfranco J. Cuadra, Esq.
          Camille A. Sanchez, Esq.
          PECHMAN LAW GROUP PLLC
          488 Madison Avenue - 17th Floor
          New York, NY 10022
          Phone: (212) 583-9500
          Email: pechman@pechmanlaw.com
                 cuadra@pechmanlaw.com
                 sanchez@pechmanlaw.com


TRIBUNE PUBLISHING: Arnold Suit Removed to N.D. Illinois
--------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Pat Arnold, on behalf of himself and others
similarly situated v. TRIBUNE PUBLISHING COMPANY, LLC, Case No.
2023CH06877 was removed from the Circuit Court of Cook County,
Illinois, to the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois on Aug. 28, 2023, and assigned Case No.
1:23-cv-06310.

The Plaintiff alleges that Tribune charged subscribers of print
editions of Tribune's newspapers throughout the United States
excess amounts for "materials already included in their
subscriptions," deducted those charges from subscribers'
subscription fees, and thus shortened subscribers' subscription
periods. The Plaintiff asserts three counts in the Complaint, for
alleged violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive
Business Practices Act ("ICFA"), Unjust Enrichment, and Declaratory
Judgment.[BN]

The Defendants are represented by:

          Jonathan H. Claydon, Esq.
          Aaron Klein, Esq.
          GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
          77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3100
          Chicago, IL 60601
          Phone: 312-456-8400
          Facsimile: 312-456-8435
          Email: claydonj@gtlaw.com
                 aaron.klein@gtlaw.com


TRINSEO PLC: Continues to Defend Bristoll Spill-Related Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------------
Trinseo PLC disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2023 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 4, 2023, that the Company continues to defend
the Bristol Spill-related class suit in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

On March 29, 2023, a putative class action complaint was filed
which seeks to certify a class that could potentially include all
persons and entities that reside in the area served by the Baxter
Drinking Water Treatment Plant.

The plaintiffs allege claims of breach of duty of care based on
negligence as a result of the Bristol Spill, as well as other
causes of action, and seek compensatory damages, restitution, or
refund of damages, including actual, statutory, and punitive
damages, as well as injunctive relief.

On May 12, 2023, the Company filed notice to remove the case from
Pennsylvania state court to United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania, with immediate effect.

On May 19, 2023, the Company also filed a motion to dismiss with
the U.S. district court, on the grounds that the alleged harms do
not fall within the parameters of the relevant public and private
nuisance or negligence laws.

On June 2, 2023, plaintiffs objected to federal jurisdiction and
asked the court to remand the action to state court.

Given the early stage of this matter, the Company wasn't not able
to estimate whether a material loss to our business is probable or
remote, or estimate a potential range of loss, if any. The Company
intends to vigorously defend this action.

Trinseo Public Limited Company operates as a materials solutions
provider and manufacturer of plastics, latex binders, and synthetic
rubber. The Company offers engineered materials, Americas
styrenics, feedstocks, polystyrene, and base plastics.edical

TYSON FOODS: Broiler Antitrust Class Suit Scope Narrowed
--------------------------------------------------------
Tyson Foods Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending July 1, 2023 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 10, 2023, that the scope of the
broiler antitrust class suit faced by the company is narrowed down
during the first trial after the court granted and denied in part
the summary judgment motions on June 30, 2023.

Beginning in September 2016, a series of putative federal class
action lawsuits styled In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation
(the "Broiler Antitrust Civil Litigation") were filed in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against
the Company and certain of its poultry subsidiaries, as well as
several other poultry processing companies.

The operative complaints, which have been amended throughout the
litigation, contain allegations that, among other things, assert
that beginning in January 2008, the defendants conspired and
combined to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price of
broiler chickens in violation of United States antitrust laws. The
plaintiffs also allege that defendants "manipulated and
artificially inflated a widely used Broiler price index, the
Georgia Dock." The plaintiffs further allege that the defendants
concealed this conduct from the plaintiffs and the members of the
putative classes.

The plaintiffs seek treble damages, injunctive relief, pre- and
post-judgment interest, costs, and attorneys' fees on behalf of the
putative classes.

In addition, the complaints on behalf of the putative classes of
indirect purchasers include causes of action under various state
unfair competition laws, consumer protection laws, and unjust
enrichment common laws. Since the original filing, certain putative
class members have opted out of the matter and are proceeding with
individual direct actions making similar claims, and others may do
so in the future.

The first trial in this matter, which will involve claims brought
by the Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Class and certain direct-action
plaintiffs, is scheduled to begin on September 12, 2023.

On June 30, 2023, the court granted, in part, and denied, in part,
summary judgment motions the Company had filed and joined,
narrowing the scope of the claims the Company is facing in this
first trial.

TYSON FOODS, INC. produces, distributes, and markets chicken,
beef,
pork, prepared foods, and related allied products. The Company's
products are marketed and sold to national and regional grocery
retailers, regional grocery wholesalers, meat distributors,
warehouse club stores, military commissaries, and industrial food
processing companies. [BN]



TYSON FOODS: Continues to Defend Peterson Class Suit
----------------------------------------------------
Tyson Foods Inc. disclosed in its Form 10-Q Report for the
quarterly period ending July 1, 2023 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 10, 2023, that the Company continues
to defend itself from the Peterson class suit in the United States
District Court for the District of Minnesota.

On April 26, 2019, a putative class of indirect purchasers filed a
class action complaint against the Company, other beef packers, and
Agri Stats in the United States District Court for the District of
Minnesota.

The plaintiffs allege that the packer defendants conspired to
reduce slaughter capacity by closing or idling plants, limiting
their purchases of cash cattle, coordinating their procurement of
cash cattle, and reducing their slaughter numbers so as to reduce
beef output, all in order to artificially raise prices of beef.

The plaintiffs seek, among other things, damages under state
antitrust and consumer protection statutes and the common law of
approximately 30 states, as well as injunctive relief. The indirect
consumer purchaser litigation is styled Peterson v. JBS USA Food
Company Holdings, et al. Additional complaints have been filed on
behalf of a putative class of direct purchasers of beef containing
allegations of violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act based on
an alleged conspiracy to artificially fix, raise, and stabilize the
wholesale price for beef, as well as on behalf of a putative class
of commercial and institutional indirect purchasers of beef
containing allegations of violations of Section 1 of the Sherman
Act, various state antitrust laws and unjust enrichment based on an
alleged conspiracy to artificially inflate the price for beef.

On February 18, 2021, the Company moved to dismiss the plaintiffs'
amended complaints, and on September 14, 2021, the court granted
the motion with respect to certain state law claims but denied the
motion with respect to the plaintiffs' federal antitrust claims.

Since the original filing, certain putative class members have
opted out of the matter and are proceeding with individual direct
actions making similar claims, and others may do so in the future.


The Company has not recorded any liability for this matter as it
does not believe a loss is probable or reasonably estimable at this
time because the Company believes that it has valid and meritorious
defenses against the allegations and because the classes have not
yet been defined or certified by the court.

TYSON FOODS, INC. produces, distributes, and markets chicken,
beef,
pork, prepared foods, and related allied products. The Company's
products are marketed and sold to national and regional grocery
retailers, regional grocery wholesalers, meat distributors,
warehouse club stores, military commissaries, and industrial food
processing companies. [BN]

UMA EDUCATION: Underpays Inside Sales Representatives, Lewis Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------------
KELLON LEWIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. UMA EDUCATION INC., d/b/a ULTIMATE MEDICAL
ACADEMY, Defendant, Case No. 8:23-cv-01876 (M.D. Fla., August 18,
2023) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to
pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Mr. Lewis worked for the Defendant as an inside sales
representative under the title of Career Services Advisor during
the period of December 2022 until April 21, 2023.

UMA Education Inc., doing business as Ultimate Medical Academy, is
a nonprofit healthcare educational institution, with its principal
place of business located in Tampa, Florida. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Mitchell L. Feldman, Esq
         FELDMAN LEGAL GROUP
         6916 W. Linebaugh Ave. #101
         Tampa, FL 33625
         Telephone: (813) 639-9366
         Facsimile: (813) 639-9376
         E-mail: mfeldman@flandgatrialattorneys.com

UNITEDLEX CORPORATION: Behrendt Suit Transferred to D. Kansas
-------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Adam Behrendt, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. UnitedLex Corporation, Case No.
4:23-cv-00434 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Missouri, to the U.S. District Court for the
District of Kansas on Aug. 28, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-02371-HLT-GEB to
the proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract for Breach of
Contract.

UnitedLex Corporation -- https://unitedlex.com/ -- provides
consulting services. The Company offers services such as litigation
support, project management, law firm solutions, intellectual
property, data hosting, and legal staffing.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Abby E. McClellan Paradise, Esq.
          John Austin Moore, Esq.
          Norman Eli Siegel, Esq.
          Stueve Siegel Hanson, LLP - KC
          460 Nichols Road, Suite 200
          Kansas City, MO 64112
          Phone: (816) 714-7100
          Fax: (816) 714-7101
          Email: mcclellan@stuevesiegel.com
                 moore@stuevesiegel.com
                 siegel@stuevesiegel.com

               - and -

          Bryce B. Bell, Esq.
          Jenilee V. Zentrich, Esq.
          BELL LAW, LLC
          2600 Grand Blvd., Suite 580
          Kansas City, MO 64108
          Phone: (816) 886-8206
          Fax: (816) 817-8500
          Email: bryce@BellLawkc.com
                 jz@belllawkc.com

               - and -

          Eric D. Barton, Esq.
          WAGSTAFF & CARTMELL, LLP
          4740 Grand Avenue, Suite 300
          Kansas City, MO 64112
          Phone: (816) 701-1100
          Fax: (816) 531-2372
          Email: ebarton@wcllp.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Mitchell E. Wood, Esq.
          HALBROOK WOOD, PC
          3500 W. 75th Street, Suite 300
          Prairie Village, KS 66208
          Phone: (913) 529-1164
          Fax: (913) 529-1199
          Email: mwood@halbrookwoodlaw.com


VIA ALLORO: Pardo Seeks Unpaid Overtime Wages for Food Runners
--------------------------------------------------------------
DANIEL PARDO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. VIA ALLORO INC. (DBA ANGELINA'S RESTAURANT)
and ANGELA MALERBA, Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-06292 (E.D.N.Y.,
August 22, 2023) is a class action against the Defendants for
failure to pay minimum and overtime wages in violation of the Fair
Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law.

The Plaintiff was employed as a food runner at Angelina's
Restaurant's offices at 399 Ellis St., Staten Island, New York from
approximately August 2020 until October 2022.

Via Alloro Inc. is the owner and operator of Angelina's Restaurant
located at 399 Ellis St., Staten Island, New York. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Lina Stillman, Esq.
         STILLMAN LEGAL, P.C.
         42 Broadway, 12th Floor
         New York, NY 10004
         Telephone: (212) 203-2417

WESTERN DIGITAL: Solid-State Drives "Defective," Pousa Alleges
--------------------------------------------------------------
EMILIO POUSA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and DOES
1-10, Defendants, Case No. 5:23-cv-04281-VKD (N.D. Cal., August 22,
2023) is a class action against the Defendants for breach of
contract, breach of express warranties, breach of implied
warranties of merchantability and fitness for particular purpose,
common counts, and violation of the California Business and
Professions Code.

The case arises from the Defendants' alleged design, marketing, and
distribution of defective Western Digital solid-state drives.
According to the complaint, the SSDs are suddenly, and without
warning, wiping data and, in some cases, becoming unreadable. In
other words, the SSDs suddenly become worthless. After months of
inaction, Defendant Western Digital admitted that the SSDs had a
firmware problem and released a firmware update that purported to
resolve issues on some of the SSDs that are regularly failing
customers. However, Western Digital's purported fix has not
resolved anything and consumers continue to have their products
fail, causing them to lose the valuable data they stored on the
SSDs, and defeating the purpose of owning an SSD in the first
place. As a result, the Plaintiff and Class members did not receive
the goods as impliedly warranted by the Defendants to be
merchantable, says the suit.

Western Digital Technologies, Inc. is a company that develops and
manufactures storage solutions, with its principal place of
business in San Jose, California. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Alan M. Mansfield, Esq.
         WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP
         16870 W. Bernardo Drive, Suite 400
         San Diego, CA 92127
         Telephone: (619) 308-5034
         E-mail: amansfield@whatleykallas.com

WESTPOINT HOME: Zinnamon Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Westpoint Home, LLC.
The case is styled as Warren Zinnamon, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Westpoint Home, LLC, Case No.
1:23-cv-07662 (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

WestPoint Home, Inc. -- http://www.westpointhome.com/-- is a
supplier of fashion and core home textile products.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          1 University Plaza, Ste. 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Email: pshaker@steinsakslegal.com


YEAR OF OURS: Luis Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Year Of Ours, Inc.
The case is styled as Kevin Yan Luis, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. Year Of Ours, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-07654 (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 29, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Year of Ours -- https://yearofours.com/ -- focuses on fit,
performance and contemporary designs intended to be
multi-functional, reflecting the demands of the dynamic and modern
woman.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noor Abou-Saab, I, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF NOOR A. SAAB
          380 North Broadway, Suite 300
          Jericho, NY 11753
          Phone: (718) 740-5060
          Email: noorasaablaw@gmail.com


                        Asbestos Litigation

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Avon Products Has 275 Cases Pending as of June 30
------------------------------------------------------------------
Natura &Co Holding S.A.'s subsidiary, Avon Products, Inc., as of
June 30, 2023, has reported 275 individual cases pending (during
the six-month period ended June 30, 2023, 108 new cases were
started and 61 were dismissed, settled or otherwise resolved),
according to the Company's Form 6-K filing with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission.

The Company states, "The subsidiary Avon Products, Inc., has been
named a defendant in numerous personal injury lawsuits filed in
U,S, courts, alleging that certain talc products the company sold
in the past were contaminated with asbestos.

"Many of these actions involve a number of co-defendants, including
manufacturers of cosmetics and manufacturers of other products
that, unlike the subsidiary Avon's Products, were designed to
contain asbestos. As of June 30, 2023, there were 275 individual
cases pending against the subsidiary Avon (during the six-month
period ended June 30, 2023, 108 new cases were started and 61 were
dismissed, settled or otherwise resolved)."

A full-text copy of the Form 6-K is available at
http://tinyurl.com/bdf2y2th



ASBESTOS UPDATE: CIRCOR Int'l. Still Faces Product Liability Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Asbestos-related product liability claims continue to be filed
against two of CIRCOR International, Inc.'s subsidiaries: CIRCOR
Instrumentation Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a Hoke, Inc.), the stock of
which the Company acquired in 1998, and Spence Engineering Company,
Inc., the stock of which the Company acquired in 1984, according to
the Company's Form 10-Q filing with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.

The Hoke subsidiary was divested in January 2020 through the sale
of the I&S business. However, the Company has indemnified the buyer
for asbestos-related claims that are made against Hoke. Due to the
nature of the products supplied by these entities, the markets they
serve and the Company's historical experience in resolving these
claims, the Company does not expect that these asbestos-related
claims will have a material adverse effect on the financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

During the second quarter of 2021, the Company was notified of a
contract termination by one of its Industrial segment customers.
The basis for termination is under dispute and the ultimate outcome
of this matter is uncertain. During the fourth quarter of 2021, the
Company recorded a full allowance against the outstanding
receivables resulting in a charge of $6.3 million. The Company also
has outstanding guarantees of its performance under the contract in
the aggregate amount of $3.4 million. Further, the Company is
exposed to claims from sub-contractors for contract termination.
During the fourth quarter of 2022, a settlement agreement was
reached for $4.5 million which was paid by the Company during the
first half of 2023.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available at
http://tinyurl.com/42x9f2xd



ASBESTOS UPDATE: FG Group Defends Personal Injury Lawsuits
----------------------------------------------------------
FG Group Holdings, Inc., is named as a defendant in personal injury
lawsuits based on alleged exposure to asbestos-containing
materials, according to the Company's Form 10-Q filing with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

A majority of the cases involve product liability claims based
principally on allegations of past distribution of commercial
lighting products containing wiring that may have contained
asbestos. Each case names dozens of corporate defendants in
addition to FG Group Holdings. In FG Group Holdings experience, a
large percentage of these types of claims have never been
substantiated and have been dismissed by the courts. FG Group
Holdings has not suffered any adverse verdict in a trial court
proceeding related to asbestos claims and intends to continue to
defend these lawsuits. Under the FG Group Holdings Asset Purchase
Agreement, the Company agreed to indemnify FG Group Holdings for
future losses, if any related to current product liability or
personal injury claims arising out of products sold or distributed
in the U.S. by the operations of the businesses being transferred
to the Company in the Separation, in an aggregate amount not to
exceed $250,000 per year, as well as to indemnify FG Group Holdings
for all expenses (including legal fees) related to the defense of
such claims. As of June 30, 2023, the Company has a loss
contingency reserve of approximately $0.2 million, which represents
the Company's estimate of its potential losses related to the
settlement of open cases. During 2022 and the first half of 2023,
the FG Group Holdings settled three cases, which resulted in
payments totaling $53,000. When appropriate, the FG Group Holdings
may settle additional claims in the future. The Company does not
expect the resolution of these cases to have a material adverse
effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available at
http://tinyurl.com/434adupa

ASBESTOS UPDATE: GlassBridge Defends Exposure Claims
----------------------------------------------------
Jimmie D. Dean and Evelyn Dean filed an action against GlassBridge
Enterprises, Inc., and dozens of other defendants in the 12th
Judicial Circuit Court, St. Clair County Illinois (23 LA 0395)
asserting claims related to asbestos, according to the Company's
Form 10-Q filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Plaintiff alleged that the Company negligently constructed and/or
maintained its premises and that Plaintiff was wrongfully exposed
to asbestos-containing products while on its premises. Plaintiff
further alleged that such activity was a direct and proximate cause
of his development and contraction of an asbestos-related disease,
including Lung Cancer. Damages alleged are in excess of $50,000.

The claim is being made against the Company due to its acquisition
of certain assets of Memorex International Inc. in 2006. Such
acquisition specifically excluded any undisclosed and contingent
liabilities including any litigation that was commenced after
closing. Accordingly, counsel to the Company has contacted
plaintiff's counsel to request a voluntary dismissal from the
action.

As of June 30, 2023, the Company believes that an outcome resulting
in a loss is remote and does not have any accruals related to the
matter.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available at
http://tinyurl.com/546npyc7



                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Rousel Elaine T.
Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L.
Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2023. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***