---

              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, June 21, 2023, Vol. 25, No. 124

                            Headlines

ACCENTURE FEDERAL: Bridges et al. Sue Over Delayed Disbursements
AETNA INC: Fails to Protect Subscribers' Personal Info, Vogel Says
ALLIED POWER: Fails to Pay Overtime Wages, Cardell and Joseph Claim
ALLY BANK: Settlement in Velazquez Class Suit Gets Initial Nod
AMAZON.COM SERVICES: Hodges Endorsed as Class Counsel in Boone Suit

ARTIST FRAME SERVICE: Hussein Files ADA Suit in N.D. Illinois
AS BETHPAGE: Fails to Pay OT Wages Under FLSA, Vasquez Suit Alleges
ATHLETIC BREWING: Martinez Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
ATLAS LITHIUM: Salomon Sues Over Misleading Registration Statements
BARCLAYS PLC: $105MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Sept. 7

BAYER CORP: Drake Sues Over False Product Labeling of Fruit Bites
BIG IP OPCO LLC: Hwang Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
BIG LOTS: Wins Bid to Deny Class Certification in Cornejo Suit
BMW OF NORTH: Armstrong Sues Over Defective Motor Vehicles
BRIDGE LEGAL: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Blue Suit Alleges

BRISTOL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: Westfield Files Suit in Mass. Super. Ct.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION: Oliver Suit Transferred to S.D. California
CARVANA INC: Harvin Sues Over Deceptive Trade Practices
CENTER FOR VEIN: Sued Over Unlawful Disclosure of Patients' Info
CHAIN DRUG: Ashley Sues Over Mislabeled Adhesive Patches

CHAMBERS STREET CAVE: Hwang Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
CITY WIDE PARKING: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Kaouris Suit Alleges
COLETTE PETERS: Salinas Files Suit in N.D. West Virginia
COLETTE PETERS: Thompson Files Suit in N.D. West Virginia
COLONIAL LOGISTICS: Fails to Pay Overtime Premiums, Espiritu Says

COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: Discloses Users' Private Info, Munoz Says
CONVENT 1 LLC: Woodson Damages to Be Calculated From Nov. 29, 2013
CORELOGIC INC: Mismanages 401 (K) Retirement Funds, Sabana Says
CUBICLE ENTERPRISES: Hwang Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
CYCLE GEAR INC: Otat Suit Removed to N.D. California

D.P. PAVING: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Alonso Suit Alleges
DAVID DAWDY: Smith Files Suit in W.D. Michigan
DISH NETWORK: Cardenas Files Suit in D. Colorado
DISH NETWORK: Fails to Protect Employees' Info, Ellerbrock Says
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: Clark et al. Sue Over Breach of Contract

DOTHAN SECURITY: Ruiz Sues Over Unpaid Minimum, Overtime Wages
DX ENTERPRISES: Court Denies Bids to Dismiss & Stay McClaine Suit
DYSON INC: Castiel Sues Over Unlawful Repair Restriction
DYWIDAG SYSTEMS: Vandermost Suit Removed to S.D. California
ESCAPE NAILS: Fails to Pay Overtime Wages, Li Suit Alleges

ESSENTIAL STAFFING: Minor Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
FANTASIA TRADING: Bassaw Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
FIRMENICH SA: B & E Sues Over Fragrances' Price Monopoly
FIRST HORIZON: Amicarelli Sues Over Drop in Share Price
FITBIT LLC: Foster, Hunter Sue Over Missing Facts in Product Labels

FORD MOTOR: Garrison Builders Suit Transferred to E.D. Michigan
FORD MOTOR: Gurrola Sues Over Vehicles' Safety Issue Nondisclosure
G&G DISTRIBUTION: Toro Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
GATE GOURMET: Fails to Pay Proper Wages to Drivers, Fiallo Claims
GATE GOURMET: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Fiallo Suit Alleges

GAYNOR MINDEN: Alexandria Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS: Haak Suit Transferred to E.D. Wisconsin
GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS: Moon Suit Transferred to E.D. Wisconsin
GEORGE SUPER TOPCO: Black Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
GIVAUDAN SA: Candle Shoppe Sues Over Fragrances' Price Monopoly

GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC: FWK Holdings Suit Moved to Dist. of New Jersey
GOTHAM PLASTIC SURGERY: Hwang Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
GRE3N LLC: Andrus et al. Seek to Recover Unpaid Wages
GSK CONSUMER HEALTH: Cirrito Files Suit in W.D. New York
HARVARD PILGRIM: Fails to Safeguard Customers' Info, Wilson Says

HEARST TELEVISION: Gravel Suit Transferred to D. Vermont
HOME DEPOT: Class Settlement in Carlson Suit Gets Final Approval
HOME WARRANTY: Caban Sues Over Debt Collection Practices
HOUSING AUTHORITY: Harris Suit Removed to C.D. California
HUUUGE INC: Ballew, Honderich Allege Deceptive Marketing Practices

HW SELLER: Fails to Pay Proper Overtime Wages, Davis Suit Alleges
ICAHN ENTERPRISES: Fails to Disclose Material Facts to Investors
INCORP INDUSTRIES: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Bermudez Alleges
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD: McAhren Files Suit in W.D. Kentucky
JED C. KAMINETSKY: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Vivas Alleges

KOHN LAW FIRM: Richards Sues Over Unfair Debt Collection Practices
LABORATORY CORPORATION: Stephens Sues Over NIPT's Deceptive Ads
LEWIS AND CLARK: Lancaster Suit Removed to S.D. Illinois
LISA'S CARE: Wilson Suit Alleges Unpaid Wages for Home Attendants
LOUCAS RESTAURANT: Rivas Sues Over Unpaid Minimum, Overtime Wages

MAIMONIDES MEDICAL: Mismanages Hospital Funds, Mann Alleges
MANAGED CARE: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Crowe Alleges
MASSACHUSETTS: Dalton Sues Over Denied COVID-19 Recovery Grant
MEDLINE INDUSTRIES: Polousy Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
MERCER UNIVERSITY: Faces Class Suit Over Alleged Data Breach

MOLEKULE INC: Bassaw Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
MOONGLOW INC: Alexandria Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
MULTIPLAN CORP: Annual Meeting Violates DGCL, Sarker Suit Says
N2G2 LLC: Toro Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
NATIONAL EXPRESS TRANSIT: Armenta Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.

NATURAL LIFESTYLE: Sends Unsolicited Telemarketing Texts, Trim Says
NEXTGEN HEALTHCARE: Ramos Files Suit in N.D. Georgia
NVR MORTGAGE: Cossaboom FLSA Suit Transferred to E.D. Virginia
ONYX COALE: Charman Files TCPA Suit in S.D. California
OSANA CLEANING: Faces Velasquez Wage-and-Hour Suit in E.D.N.Y.

PADSPLIT INC: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Cunningham Alleges
PAL MFG: Ventura Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages for Glass Cutters
PANAMA JACK: Alexandria Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
PERSIAN GALLERY: Blind Can't Access Online Store, Vachnine Claims
PETER LUGER: Web Site Not Accessible to Blind, Black Suit Says

PINK JEEP: Fails to Pay Guides' Minimum & OT Wages, Slepian Says
PROFUSION COSMETICS: Slade Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
PURE FISHING: Tucker Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
R&B CORPORATION: Brooks Files Suit in E.D. Virginia
RADIUS CORPORATION: Kunkle Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York

RE/MAX HOLDINGS: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Abante Rooter Claims
RED LION: Kunkle Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE: Howard Files TCPA Suit in D. Ariz.
RETAIL SERVICES: Schlosser Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
RHM RESTAURANT: Underpays Bartenders & Servers, Volkava Suit Says

RUG COMPANY: Vachnine Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
SACRAMENTO NATURAL: Neal Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
SAKS & CO: Faces Castillo Suit Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
SELECT PORTFOLIO: Bowen Sues Over Denied Recordings' Request
SIEMENS INDUSTRY: Laurence Files Suit in D. South Carolina

SIRIUS XM RADIO: Carovillano Sues Over Deceptive Pricing Scheme
SOMMERCAL CONCRETE: Villa Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
SPIRIT AIRLINES: Curd Suit Transferred to W.D. Pennsylvania
SPORTS VENTURE INC: Castro Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
STA PARKING: Velez Suit Seeks to Recover OT Wages Under FLSA

SUNNOVA ENERGY: Davis Suit Removed to C.D. California
SWIFT BEEF COMPANY: Meza Suit Removed to C.D. California
T-MOBILE US: Corkins Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri
T-MOBILE US: Ferguson Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri
T-MOBILE US: Frierson Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri

T-MOBILE US: Munoz Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri
TACTILE SYSTEMS: $5MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Aug. 23
TALKSHOPLIVE INC: Ligon Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
THEO CHOCOLATE: Dark Chocolate Contains Cadmium, Lead, Suit Says
THERABODY INC: Slade Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York

TISHMAN SPEYER: Turner Sues Over Unpaid Wages for Security Guards
TLCS INC: Green-Dominguez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
TOP FLIGHT REGISTRY: Minor Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
TOTAL CARE RX: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Bohler Suit Claims
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: Moala Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.

UNITED STATES: Class Deal in Avendano v. ICE Wins Final Approval
UNITED STATES: Stipulated Bid to Dismiss Avendano v. ICE Granted
UPFIELD US: Faces Skzynear Class Suit Over Oil Spreads' False Ads
US FOODS: Illegally Collects Employees' Biometrics, Trent Claims
VIRGINIA CREDIT: Brown Sues Over Improper Overdraft Fee Collection

WINERY EXCHANGE: Web Site Not Accessible to Blind, Bunting Says
YUM BRANDS: Fails to Protect Customers' Private Info, Knighten Says

                            *********

ACCENTURE FEDERAL: Bridges et al. Sue Over Delayed Disbursements
----------------------------------------------------------------
DEMETRIA BRIDGES, GREG GREGORIAN, CYNTHIA JESSE, ALVARO RODRIGUEZ,
THOMAS TAYLOR, THELMA WATSON, and TAJ WHITE, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. ACCENTURE
FEDERAL SERVICES, ALIGHT SOLUTIONS LLC, RAVINDRA DEO, LEONA BRIDGE,
DANA K. BILYEU, STACIE OLIVARES, and MIKE GERBER, Defendants, Case
No. 1:23-cv-01568 (D.D.C., June 1, 2023) alleges claims against
Defendants for violations of the Federal Employees Retirement
System Act, breaches of fiduciary duties, negligence, unjust
enrichment, and breach of contract.

Prior to 2022, the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), under the oversight
of the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) and the
Executive Director, primarily managed TSP accounts in-house,
without any major, systemic issues harming TSP participants. In
November 2020, the FRTIB and Executive Director decided that they
no longer desired to have such a hands-on role in the management of
the TSP accounts and benefits, and retained two private entities
Accenture Federal Services (AFS) and Alight to take over
recordkeeping services for the TSP. But over the subsequent
eighteen months, AFS and Alight failed to adequately prepare to
take over the TSP and the FRTIB, and the Executive Director failed
to oversee AFS and Alight's work in order to ensure that they
fulfilled their legal obligations owed to Class members under
FERSA, says the suit.

The Defendants' alleged delay and/or failure to disburse Hardship
Withdrawals, Out of Service Withdrawals, Death Benefits, and TSP
Loan proceeds has directly and proximately caused Plaintiffs and
TSP participants to suffer actual injury, economic damages, and
other injury and actual harm. In many instances, TSP's failure to
timely disburse funds to military personnel, veterans, and federal
employees has forced them to procure high interest consumer loans
as alternatives so they are able to pay their bills and avoid
foreclosures, repossessions, and other hardships. Accordingly,
Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, bring this action to redress Defendants' breaches of
fiduciary duties, negligence, unjust enrichment, and breach of
contract, and also seek injunctive relief enjoining Defendants from
their ongoing injurious conduct.

AFS is a wholly owned subsidiary of Accenture LLP, headquartered in
Arlington, Virginia. AFS operates as a private consulting firm
representing government agencies in the U.S. and other clients,
helping them manage change, modernize information systems, optimize
key headquarters governance and processes, and create improvement
strategies. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

            James P. Ulwick, Esq.
            KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A.
            One South Street, Suite 2600
            Baltimore, MD 21202
            Telephone: (410) 752-6030
            Facsimile: (410) 539-1269
            E-mail: julwick@kg-law.com

                     - and -

            Joseph G. Sauder, Esq.
            Matthew D. Schelkopf, Esq.
            Joseph B. Kenney, Esq.
            SAUDER SCHELKOPF LLC
            1109 Lancaster Avenue
            Berwyn, PA 19312
            Telephone: (888) 711-9975
            Facsimile: (610) 421-1326
            E-mail: jgs@sstriallawyers.com
                    mds@sstriallawyers.com
                    jbk@sstriallawyers.com

                    - and -

            Elizabeth A. Fegan, Esq.
            FEGAN SCOTT LLC
            150 S. Wacker Dr., 24th Floor
            Chicago, IL 60606
            Telephone: (312) 741-1019
            Facsimile: (312) 264-0100
            E-mail: beth@feganscott.com

AETNA INC: Fails to Protect Subscribers' Personal Info, Vogel Says
------------------------------------------------------------------
DONNA VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. AETNA, INC., Case No. 3:23-cv-00740-JAM (D. Conn., June
7, 2023) alleges that Aetna failed to protect the personally
identifiable and health information of over a million people that
subscribe to Aetna's health insurance because of inadequate
security.

The Plaintiff contends that the Defendant failed to comply with
regulatory, ethical, and industry standards for cybersecurity and
confidentiality of sensitive personal information, and failed to
timely prevent, detect, and adequately respond to a foreseeable
data breach carried out by cyber criminals.

As a result of Aetna's inadequate security, unauthorized persons
accessed information from Aetna's customers sometime between
January 18, 2023 and January 30, 2023. The cyber criminals gained
access to, copied, and stole Plaintiff's and Class members'
personal information through a flaw in managed file transfer
("MFT") software used by Aetna's benefits administration services
provider, NationsBenefits (the "Data Breach"). The information
affected in the Data Breach included the following: full names,
addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, Social Security numbers
(Personal Identifying Information or PII), and health insurance
numbers, medical ID numbers, health plan subscriber identification
numbers, date of service, medical device or product purchased, and
provider/care giver name (Personal Health Information or PHI). The
notice of the Data Breach was unreasonably delayed. The Plaintiff
and some Class members were not notified until the end of April
2023, giving the criminals a head start to commit identity fraud,
and theft, says the suit.

The Plaintiff suffered actual injury from having her PII/PHI
compromised because of the Data Breach including, damage to and
diminution in the value of her PII/PHI; violation of privacy
rights; and present, imminent and impending injury arising from the
increased risk of identity theft and fraud, the suit added.

Plaintiff Vogel is a citizen of Ohio who receives health insurance
from Aetna.

Aetna is an American managed health care company that sells
traditional and consumer directed health care insurance and related
services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          John Kanca, Esq.
          THE KANCA LAW FIRM, LLC
          40 Richards Avenue, Suite 353
          Norwalk, CT 06854
          Telephone: (203) 806-7003
          Facsimile: (833) 239-1928
          E-mail: john@connecticutinjury.law

                - and -

          Marc E. Dann, Esq.
          Brian D. Flick, Esq.
          DANN LAW
          15000 Madison Avenue
          Lakewood, OH 44107
          Telephone: (216) 373-0539
          Facsimile: (216) 373-0536
          E-mail: notices@dannlaw.com

                - and -

          Thomas A. Zimmerman, Jr., Esq.
          Sharon A. Harris, Esq.
          ZIMMERMAN LAW OFFICES, P.C.
          www.attorneyzim.com
          77 W. Washington Street, Suite 1220
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 440-0020
          Facsimile: (312) 440-4180
          E-mail: tom@attorneyzim.com
                  sharon@attorneyzim.com

ALLIED POWER: Fails to Pay Overtime Wages, Cardell and Joseph Claim
-------------------------------------------------------------------
THOMAS CARDELL and STEPHEN JOSEPH, individually and on behalf of
other similarly situated employees, Plaintiffs v. ALLIED POWER
RESOURCES, LLC and ALLIED POWER SERVICES, LLC, Defendants, Case No.
1:23-cv-03493 (N.D. Ill., June 2, 2023) arises out of the
Defendants' violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the
Illinois Minimum Wage Law, the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act, the
Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law, the Maryland Wage &
Hour Law and Maryland Labor & Employment Code, and the New York
Labor Law.

Plaintiff Cardell was employed by Allied as a site manager from
June 2017 until June 2021 while Plaintiff Joseph was a project
manager for Allied from October 2019 until November 2021.
Plaintiffs regularly worked more than 40 hours in a week. However,
Allied did not pay Plaintiffs overtime for all hours worked in
excess of 40 hours in a single workweek. Rather than receiving time
and half as required by the FLSA, IMWL, PMWA, PWPCL, MWHL, and
NYLL, Plaintiffs only received "straight time" pay for overtime
hours worked.  Accordingly, Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit to
recover unpaid overtime wages and other damages owed under the
FLSA, the IMWL, the PMWA, the PWPCL, the MWHL, and the NYLL.

Allied Power Resources, LLC, is a limited liability corporation
incorporated in Delaware. It is a full-service provider of power
plant services. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Douglas M. Werman, Esq.
          Maureen A. Salas, Esq.
          Sarah J. Arendt, Esq.
          WERMAN SALAS P.C.
          77 W. Washington, Suite 1402
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 419-1008
          E-mail: dwerman@flsalaw.com
                  msalas@flsalaw.com
                  sarendt@flsalaw.com

                  - and -

          Michael A. Josephson, Esq.
          Richard M. Schreiber, Esq.
          JOSEPHSON DUNLAP, LLP
          11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 3050
          Houston, TX 77046
          Telephone: (713) 352-1100
          Facsimile: (713) 352-3300
          E-mail: mjosephson@mybackwages.com
                  rschreiber@mybackwages.com

                  - and -

          Richard J. (Rex) Burch, Esq.
          BRUCKNER BURCH, P.L.L.C.
          8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1500
          Houston, TX 77046
          Telephone: (713) 877-8788
          Facsimile: (713) 877-8065
          E-mail: rburch@brucknerburch.com

ALLY BANK: Settlement in Velazquez Class Suit Gets Initial Nod
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MARIELA AGUILAR VELAZQUEZ,
an individual, and RONEY EDLER BARROSO DA SILVA, an individual, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. ALLY
BANK, Case No. 2:21-cv-02375-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal.), the Hon. Judge
Morrison C. England, Jr. entered an order granting the Plaintiffs'
motion for preliminary settlement approval.

The Court preliminarily certifies the following classes solely for

purposes of the settlement:

   "California Class" means those persons who applied for a
   checking or savings account with [the Defendant] between
   December 20, 2019, and the date of the Preliminary Approval
   Order, resided in California at the time of the application,
   possessed a valid [SSN] or Individual Taxpayer Identification
   Number [(ITIN)] at the time of the application, and were not
   permitted to open or be added to an Ally checking or savings
   account because they were not U.S. permanent residents.

    "National Class" means those persons who applied for a
    checking or savings account with [the Defendant] between
    December 20, 2017, and the date of the Preliminary Approval
    Order, resided in the U.S. but outside of California, possessed

    a valid SSN or ITIN at the time of the application, and were
not
    permitted to open or be added to an Ally checking or savings
    account because they were not U.S. permanent residents.

The Court appoints the Plaintiffs as Class Representatives and
MALDEF as Class Counsel.

The Court appoints Angeion Group as the Settlement Administrator.

Class Members who wish to receive payment under the Settlement
shall complete, sign, and return the Claim Form in accordance with
the instructions contained therein. All Claim Forms must be
postmarked no later than 60 days after the Notice Mailing Date
(Claim Deadline). If requested, any official documentation required
to support a Claim Form must be submitted no later than 21 days
after the Claim Deadline. Any Class Member who does not submit a
timely and valid Claim Form shall be barred from receiving payment
under the Settlement, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, but
shall nevertheless be bound by any Final Judgment entered by the
Court.

Class Members who wish to exclude themselves from the Settlement
must complete, sign, and return the Request to Opt Out form not
later than 45 days after the Notice Mailing Date to the Settlement
Administrator. If requested, the Request to Opt Out form must also
include official documentation as set forth above.

Any Class Member who does not timely and validly exclude himself or
herself from the Settlement Class may object to the Settlement but
must do so in writing not later than 45 days after the Notice
Mailing Date (Objection Deadline) in accordance with the Settlement
and this Memorandum and Order. The written Objection must be filed
with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of California, Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse,
501 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814. If requested, the
Objection must also include official documentation.

All Class Members who do not exclude themselves from the Settlement
Class by properly and timely submitting a Request to Opt Out form
shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in this action
concerning the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable to the
Class.

The Final Approval Hearing is set for Thursday, October 19, 2023,
at 10 a.m. before the undersigned and will be conducted by
videoconference.

A copy of the Court's order dated May 26, 2023, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3P2jTqp at no extra charge.[CC]

AMAZON.COM SERVICES: Hodges Endorsed as Class Counsel in Boone Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, HEATHER BOONE, et al., Plaintiffs v. AMAZON.COM
SERVICES, LLC, Defendant, Lead Case No. 1:21-CV-00241-ADA-BAM,
Member Case No. 1:22-CV-00146-ADA-BAM (E.D. Cal.), Magistrate Judge
Barbara A. McAuliffe of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of California recommends that the Plaintiffs' motion for
appointment of interim class counsel be granted.

Before the Court is the unopposed motion of Plaintiffs Heather
Boone and Roxanne Rivera for appointment of interim class counsel
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g). They seek appointment
of their counsel, Hodges & Foty, LLP, as the interim class
counsel.

On Feb. 23, 2021, the Plaintiffs filed the class and collective
action, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, alleging that the Defendant implemented an unlawful
policy requiring its non-exempt, hourly workers to undergo a
COVID-19 screening each shift without pay. They assert that these
COVID-19 screenings constitute compensable time under both the Fair
Labor Standards Act and the California Labor Code, and that, by
failing to pay overtime wages for time spent in the screenings, the
Defendant violated California and federal law.

The Plaintiffs filed their motion for appointment of interim
counsel on March 10, 2023. The Defendant filed its notice of
non-opposition to the Plaintiffs' motion on March 13, 2023. The
hearing set for April 14, 2023, on the instant motion was vacated
by Judge McAuliffe and the matter was taken under submission. The
Court additionally ordered the Plaintiffs to provide notice of the
motion to the counsel in the related matter Barrera v. Amazon.com
Services LLC et al.

On May 1, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation to consolidate the
Boone et al. v. Amazon Services LLC action (Docket No.
1:21-cv-00241-ADA-BAM) with the Barrera v. Amazon.com Services LLC
et al. action. (Docket No. 1:22-cv-00146-ADA-BAM). The cases were
consolidated on May 8, 2023. On May 11, 2023, the Court convened a
Status Conference, at which Barrera's counsel informed the Court
that they were in agreement with Boone and Rivera's counsel and did
not oppose the Motion to Appoint Interim Counsel.

Judge McAuliffe has reviewed the Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for
appointment of interim class counsel and uncontested supporting
documentation, including the declarations by their attorneys Don
Foty, David Hodges, and William Hogg. She finds that designation of
Hodges & Foty, LLP as the interim class counsel is appropriate.

In reviewing the Rule 23(g)(1)(A) factors, first, Hodges & Foty,
LLP has done significant work identifying and investigating the
claims at issue. Second, on the interrelated Rule 23(g)(1)(A)
factors of the counsel's experience in handling class actions and
knowledge of the applicable law, Hodges & Foty, LLP has experience
handling class actions and the types of claims asserted in the
litigation. Finally, Hodges & Foty, LLP is a well-established,
reputable firm that can commit the requisite resources to doing
so.

Based on the foregoing, Judge McAuliffe recommends that the
Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Interim Class Counsel be
granted and that Hodges & Foty, LLP, be appointed as the interim
counsel for the putative class.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the U.S.
District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of
Title 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B). Within 21 days after being
served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file
written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned
"Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations."
The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the
specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 30, 2023 Findings &
Recommendations is available at https://tinyurl.com/3ducnctb from
Leagle.com.


ARTIST FRAME SERVICE: Hussein Files ADA Suit in N.D. Illinois
-------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Artist Frame Service,
Inc. The case is styled as Sumaya Hussein, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated v. Artist Frame Service, Inc. doing
business as: Jayson Home, Case No. 1:23-cv-03478 (D.N.J., June 2,
2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Artist Frame Service, Inc. -- https://www.artistsframe.com/ -- is a
picture frame shop named Chicago's best custom picture framer.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Yaakov Saks, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          One University Plaza, Suite 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Fax: (201) 282-6501
          Email: ysaks@steinsakslegal.com


AS BETHPAGE: Fails to Pay OT Wages Under FLSA, Vasquez Suit Alleges
-------------------------------------------------------------------
OBED VASQUEZ a/k/a JOSE REYES VASQUEZ, individually and on behalf
of others similarly situated v. AS BETHPAGE PIZZERIA CORP. d/b/a
RED VOLPE PIZZERIA, a New York corporation, and SALVATORE PESCE
JR., an individual, Case No. 1:23-cv-04199 (E.D.N.Y., June 7, 2023)
sues the Defendants for unpaid overtime wages pursuant to the Fair
Labor Standards Act, for violations of the N.Y. Labor Law, and for
violations of the "spread of hours" and overtime wage orders of the
New York Commissioner of Labor, including applicable liquidated
damages, interest, attorneys' fees, and costs.

The Plaintiff worked six days per week, 65 hours per week. The
Defendants allegedly failed to pay the Plaintiff any overtime
premium (time and a half) for hours worked over 40 in each
workweek. The Defendants also failed to pay the Plaintiff spread of
hours pay for days on which his workday lasted ten (10) or more
hours. Accordingly, the Defendants intentionally, willfully, and
repeatedly harmed the Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals
by engaging in a pattern, practice, and/or policy of violating the
FLSA and the NYLL, says the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff worked for the Defendants as a cook from February
2022 through the end of April 2023. His duties included preparing
meals, cleaning, and any other task or job that he was assigned at
any given time.

AS Bethpage is a New York corporation that owns and operates a
pizzeria restaurant known as Red Volpe Pizzeria, which is located
at 363 Broadway, Bethpage, New York.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Erik M Bashian, Esq.
          BASHIAN & PAPANTONIOU, P.C.
          500 Old Country Road, Ste. 302
          Garden City, NY 11530
          Telephone: (516) 279-1554
          Facsimile: (516) 213-0339
          E-mail: eb@bashpaplaw.com

                - and -

          Nolan Klein, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF NOLAN KLEIN, P.A.
          5550 Glades Road, Ste. 500
          Boca Raton, FL 33431
          Telephone: (954) 745-0588
          E-mail: klein@nklegal.com

ATHLETIC BREWING: Martinez Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Athletic Brewing
Company LLC. The case is styled as Pedro Martinez, individually and
as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons v.
Athletic Brewing Company LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-04102 (E.D.N.Y.,
June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Athletic Brewing Company -- http://athleticbrewing.com/-- is a
leading U.S. manufacturer of non-alcoholic craft beer based in
Stratford, Connecticut.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dan Shaked, Esq.
          SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.
          14 Harwood Court, Suite 415
          Scarsdale, NY 10583
          Phone: (917) 373-9128
          Email: shakedlawgroup@gmail.com


ATLAS LITHIUM: Salomon Sues Over Misleading Registration Statements
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DOUGLAS SALOMON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. ATLAS LITHIUM CORPORATION, MARC FOGASSA,
GUSTAVO AGUIAR, and ARELI NOGUEIRA, Defendants, Case No.
2:23-cv-04355 (C.D. Cal., June 2, 2023) is brought by the
Plaintiff, on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and
entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired
Atlas Lithium securities between March 25, 2022 and May 3, 2023,
seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants' violations of the
federal securities laws and pursuing remedies under Sections 10(b)
and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.

Atlas Lithium is a mineral exploration and development company with
lithium projects and exploration properties in other critical and
battery minerals, including nickel, rare earths, graphite, and
titanium. The Company, formerly known as Brazil Minerals, Inc., was
founded by its Chief Executive Officer Marc Fogassa and initially
operated as a diamond and gold miner. In 2013, Brazil Minerals went
public via a reverse merger that was underwritten by, among others,
Hunter Wise Securities, LLC, of which Fogassa was a Managing
Director at the time. Shortly after the Reverse Merger, Brazil
Minerals conducted a stock promotion budgeted at $1.6 million in
which the Company issued hard mailer promotion materials, entitled
"Diamonds are an investor's best friend," to investors. In addition
to touting the profitability of the diamond mining industry, the
promotional materials projected that Brazil Minerals' stock price
would reach $18.90 per share over the long term. However, in May
2013, Company insiders began dumping a significant number of shares
into the market. Thereafter, contrary to the Company's positive
representations, Brazil Minerals' stock fell approximately 90% over
the course of the year following the promotion.  Accordingly, the
Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to
disclose that, among other things, the Company overstated the
success of its lithium mining and misrepresented the nature of its
Brazilian mineral rights, says the suit.

Atlas Lithium is a Nevada corporation with principal executive
offices located at Rua Bahia, 2463, Suite 205, Belo Horizonte,
Minas Gerais, Brazil. Atlas Lithium's common stock trades in an
efficient market on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol "ATLX".
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

            Jennifer Pafiti, Esq.
            POMERANTZ LLP
            1100 Glendon Avenue, 15th Floor
            Los Angeles, CA 90024
            Telephone: (310) 405-7190
            E-mail: jpafiti@pomlaw.com

BARCLAYS PLC: $105MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Sept. 7
------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Sullivan, et al. v. Barclays plc, et al.
No. 13-cv-2811 (PKC)

Summary Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement

If you transacted in Euribor Products1 between June 1, 2005 and
March 31, 2011, inclusive ("Class Period"), then your rights will
be affected by a pending class action settlement, and you may be
entitled to a portion of the settlement fund.

The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of your rights in
connection with the proposed settlement with Settling Defendant
Societe Generale in the action titled Sullivan, et al. v. Barclays
plc, et al., No. 13-cv-2811 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y.). The settlement with
Société Générale (the "Settlement") is not a settlement with
any other Defendant and thus is not dispositive of any of
Plaintiffs' claims against other Defendants.

The Settlement has been proposed in a class action lawsuit
concerning the alleged manipulation of the Euro Interbank Offered
Rate ("Euribor") and the prices of Euribor Products during the
Class Period. The Settlement provides a total of $105 million to
pay claims from persons who transacted in Euribor Products during
the Class Period. If you qualify, you may potentially receive
benefits from the Settlement if you (a) previously submitted a
Proof of Claim and Release form ("Claim Form") in connection with
prior settlements in this Action or (b) submit a Claim Form by the
deadline set forth below.  You can also choose to exclude yourself
from the Settlement, or object to the Settlement.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York (500 Pearl St., New York, NY 10007-1312) authorized this
Notice. Before any money is paid, the Court will hold a Settlement
Hearing to decide whether to approve the Settlement.

Who Is Included?

You are a "Settlement Class Member" if you purchased, sold, held,
traded, or otherwise had any interest in Euribor Products during
the Class Period, and during the Class Period were either domiciled
in the United States or its territories or, if domiciled outside
the United States or its territories, you transacted in Euribor
Products in the United States or its territories during the Class
Period. "Settlement Class Members" include, but are not limited to,
all persons who during the Class Period traded CME Euro currency
futures contracts and options, all persons who during the Class
Period transacted in NYSE LIFFE Euribor futures and options from a
location within the United States, and all persons who during the
Class Period traded any other Euribor Product from a location
within the United States or its territories.

Contact your brokerage firm to see if you purchased, sold, held, or
traded or otherwise had any interest in Euribor Products. If you
are not sure you are included, you can get more information,
including the Settlement Agreement,2 the Notice of Proposed Class
Action Settlement, September 7, 2023 Settlement Hearing Thereon,
and Settlement Class Members' Rights (the "Settlement Notice"),
Plan of Allocation, Proof of Claim and Release, and other important
documents, at www.EuriborSettlement.com ("Settlement Website") or
by calling toll free 800-492-9154.

What Is This Litigation About?

Plaintiffs allege that during the Class Period, Defendants
(including Société Générale) conspired to manipulate and
manipulated Euribor and the prices of Euribor Products. Plaintiffs
allege that Defendants did so by using several means of
manipulation. For example, Plaintiffs allege that panel banks that
made daily Euribor submissions to Thomson Reuters falsely reported
banks' costs of borrowing in order to financially benefit their
Euribor Products positions. Plaintiffs also allege that Defendants
requested that other Defendants make false Euribor submissions on
their behalf to benefit their Euribor Products positions.

Plaintiffs further allege that Defendants continuously conspired to
fix the prices of Euribor Products in the over-the-counter market
to financially benefit their own Euribor Products positions. In
addition to coordinating Euribor submissions and agreeing on where
to price Euribor Products, Plaintiffs allege that to effectuate
their alleged manipulations of Euribor and Euribor Products during
the Class Period, Defendants engaged in "pushing cash," transmitted
false bids and offers, used derivative traders as submitters, and
rigged bids and offers for Euribor Products.

Plaintiffs have asserted legal claims under various theories,
including the Sherman Act, the Commodity Exchange Act, the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, and common
law.

Societe Generale has agreed to enter into this Settlement
Agreement, while denying the allegations brought in this action and
maintaining that it has meritorious defenses to Plaintiffs' claims
of liability and damages, in order to avoid further expense,
inconvenience and the distraction of burdensome and protracted
litigation, and thereby to resolve this controversy and avoid the
risks inherent in complex litigation.

What Does the Settlement Provide?

Under the Settlement, Societe Generale agreed to pay a total of
$105 million into the Settlement Fund. If the Court approves the
Settlement, eligible Settlement Class Members who either previously
submitted a Claim Form in connection with an earlier settlement in
the Action or submit a valid Claim Form before the claims filing
deadline may receive a share of the Settlement Fund after they are
reduced by the payment of certain expenses. The Settlement
Agreement, available on the Settlement Website, describes all of
the details about the proposed Settlement. The exact amount each
qualifying Settlement Class Member will receive from the Settlement
Fund cannot be calculated until (1) the Court approves the
Settlement; (2) certain amounts identified in the full Settlement
Agreement are deducted from the Settlement Fund; and (3) the number
of participating Class Members and the amount of their claims are
determined. In addition, each Settlement Class Member's share of
the Settlement Fund will vary depending on the information the
Settlement Class Member provides on their Claim Form.

The number of claimants who send in claims varies widely from case
to case. If less than 100% of the Settlement Class sends in a Claim
Form, you could get more money.

How Do You Ask For a Payment?

If you timely submitted a Claim Form pursuant to either: (1) the
November 29, 2017 Notice (the "2017 Notice") related to the $94
million settlement with Defendants Barclays plc, Barclays Bank plc,
and Barclays Capital Inc. (collectively, "Barclays"), the $45
million settlement with HSBC Holdings plc and HSBC Bank plc
(collectively, "HSBC"), and the $170 million settlement with
Deutsche Bank AG and DB Group Services (UK) Ltd. (collectively,
"Deutsche Bank"); (2) the December 19, 2018 Notice (the "2018
Notice") related to the $182.5 million settlement with Citigroup
Inc. and Citibank, N.A. (collectively, "Citi") and JPMorgan Chase &
Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (collectively, "JPMorgan");
and/or (3) the June 8, 2022 Notice (the "2022 Notice") related to
the $55 million settlement with Credit Agricole S.A. and Credit
Agricole CIB (collectively, "Credit Agricole"), then YOU DO NOT
HAVE TO SUBMIT A NEW CLAIM FORM TO PARTICIPATE in the Settlement
with Societe Generale. Any Settlement Class Member who previously
submitted a Claim Form in connection with the 2017 Notice, the 2018
Notice, and/or the 2022 Notice will be subject to and bound by the
releases set forth in the Settlement Agreement with Societe
Generale, unless such member submits a timely and valid request for
exclusion, explained below.

If you are a Settlement Class Member and have not previously
submitted a Claim Form, you may seek to participate in the
Settlement by submitting a Claim Form to the Claims Administrator
at the address in the Settlement Notice postmarked no later than
October 9, 2023.  You may obtain a Claim Form on the Settlement
Website or by calling the toll-free number referenced above. If you
are a Settlement Class Member and do not file a Claim Form, you
will still be bound by the releases set forth in the Settlement
Agreement if the Court enters an order approving the Settlement
Agreement.

What Are Your Other Options?

All requests to be excluded from the Settlement must be made in
accordance with the instructions set forth in the Settlement Notice
and must be postmarked to the Claims Administrator no later than
July 27, 2023.  All requests for exclusion must comply with the
requirements set forth in the Settlement Notice to be honored. The
Settlement Notice, available at the Settlement Website, explains
how to exclude yourself or object. If you exclude yourself from the
Settlement Class, you will not be bound by the Settlement Agreement
and can independently pursue claims at your own expense. However,
if you exclude yourself, you will not be eligible to share in the
Net Settlement Fund or otherwise participate in the Settlement.

The Court will hold a Settlement Hearing in this case on September
7, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. (ET), to consider whether to approve the
Settlement and a request by the lawyers representing all Settlement
Class Members (Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. and Lovell Stewart Halebian
Jacobson LLP) for an award of attorneys' fees of no more than
sixteen percent (16%), or $16,800,000, of the Settlement Fund for
investigating the facts, litigating the case, and negotiating the
Settlement, and for reimbursement of their costs and expenses in
the amount of no more than $500,000. The Plaintiffs may submit an
additional request for service awards in light of their continued
commitment and contributions that led to this Settlement for the
benefit of the putative class, but have agreed to limit any such
request to no more than $150,000.  The lawyers for the Settlement
Class may also seek additional reimbursement of costs and expenses
in connection with services provided after the Settlement Hearing.
These payments will also be deducted from the Settlement Fund
before any distributions are made to the Settlement Class.

You may ask to appear at the Settlement Hearing, but you do not
have to. For more information, call toll-free 800-492-9154 or visit
the website www.EuriborSettlement.com.

1 "Euribor Products" means any and all interest rate swaps, forward
rate agreements, futures, options, structured products, and any
other instrument or transaction related in any way to Euribor,
including but not limited to, New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE")
London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange
("LIFFE") Euribor futures contracts and options, Chicago Mercantile
Exchange ("CME") Euro currency futures contracts and options, Euro
currency forward agreements, Euribor-based swaps, Euribor-based
forward rate agreements, and/or any other financial instruments
that reference Euribor.

2 The "Settlement Agreement" means the agreement between Plaintiffs
and Société Générale entered into on March 31, 2023, and filed
with the Court in this action.


BAYER CORP: Drake Sues Over False Product Labeling of Fruit Bites
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DENIECE DRAKE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. BAYER CORPORATION, Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-04022-EK-LB (E.D.N.Y., May 31, 2023) arises out of the
Defendant's violations of Sections 340 and 350 of the New York
General Business Law.

Plaintiff Drake seeks to remedy the deceptive and misleading
business practices of Bayer Corp. with respect to the marketing and
sales of its One a Day Natural Fruit Bites products that represent
that they are natural.

The Defendant manufactures, sells, and distributes these products
using a marketing and advertising campaign centered around claims
that appeal to health-conscious consumers, i.e., that the said
products are natural; however, Defendant's advertising and
marketing campaign is false, deceptive, and misleading because
these products contain non-natural, synthetic ingredients. These
ingredients include Cholecalciferol, Niacinamide, Pyridoxine
hydrochloride, D-biotin, and Potassium iodide, says the suit.

Bayer Corporation is a corporation with its principal place of
business in Whippany, NJ. Defendant manufactures, markets,
advertises, and distributes the Products throughout the US. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

            Charles D. Moore, Esq.
            REESE LLP
            100 South 5th Street, Suite 1900
            Minneapolis, MN 55402
            Telephone: (212) 643-0500
            Email: cmoore@reesellp.com

                   - and -

            Michael R. Reese, Esq.
            Sue J. Nam, Esq.
            Carlos F. Ramirez, Esq.
            REESE LLP
            100 West 93rd Street, 16th Floor
            New York, NY 10025
            Telephone: (212) 643-0500
            Facsimile: (212) 253-4272
          
                   -and -

            George V. Granade
            REESE LLP
            8484 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 515
            Los Angeles, CA 90211
            Telephone: (310) 393-0070
            Facsimile: (212) 253-4272
            E-mail: ggranade@reesellp.com

BIG IP OPCO LLC: Hwang Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Big Ip Opco, LLC. The
case is styled as Jenny Hwang, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated v. Big Ip Opco, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-04202
(E.D.N.Y., June 7, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Big IP Opco doing business as Babe Hair Extensions --
https://babehairextensions.com/ -- offer hand-crafted,
ethically-sourced, 100% human remy hair extensions for their
clients.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          14749 71st Ave.
          Flushing, NY 11367
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


BIG LOTS: Wins Bid to Deny Class Certification in Cornejo Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, KATY CORNEJO, individually and on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. BIG LOTS STORES,
INC., an Ohio corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants,
Case No. 2:22-cv-01247-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal.), Judge Morrison C.
England, Jr., of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of California grants the Defendant's Motion to Deny Class
Certification.

On April 20, 2022, Cornejo, on behalf of herself and others
similarly situated, initiated the present wage-and-hour class
action in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento,
against her former employer, Defendant Big Lots. The Defendant
subsequently removed the action to this Court on July 14, 2022,
under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, 28 U.S.C. Section
1332(d). Presently before the Court is the Defendant's Motion to
Deny Class Certification.

The Plaintiff was formerly employed by the Defendant in an hourly,
non-exempt position. As a condition of employment, the Defendant
requires that all newly hired associates agree to mutual
arbitration. A substantively identical arbitration agreement is
used for current associates except that the Defendant made agreeing
to mutual arbitration voluntary.

According to the Defendant, the total number of Putative Class
Members for the period of Feb. 3, 2020, to Jan. 26, 2023 (Putative
Class Members), is approximately 1,508. Of these 1,508 Putative
Class Members, at least 1,469 Putative Class Members executed the
Defendant's Arbitration Agreement. This equates to 97.41% of the
Putative Class Members who executed the Arbitration Agreement. The
Plaintiff, however, never signed or completed an arbitration
agreement for current associates.

The Plaintiff seeks to certify the following class: "all persons
who are or were employed by Defendants as hourly paid, non-exempt
retail employees in the State of California at any time from four
years prior to the filing of this action through resolution or
trial of the matter." The Defendant argues the Plaintiff cannot
satisfy Rule 23(a) because she is atypical and an inadequate
representative.

Judge England explains that to demonstrate typicality, the putative
class must show that the named parties' claims are typical of the
class. The test of typicality is whether other members have the
same or similar injury, whether the action is based on conduct
which is not unique to the named plaintiffs, and whether other
class members have been injured by the same course of conduct.
Similarly, the named plaintiffs must fairly and adequately protect
the interests of the class. In making this determination, courts
must consider two questions: (1) do the named plaintiffs and their
counsel have any conflicts of interest with other class members and
(2) will the named plaintiffs and their counsel prosecute the
action vigorously on behalf of the class?

The Defendant contends that the Plaintiff cannot satisfy these two
requirements because she did not sign an arbitration agreement
whereas 97.41% of the putative class members did. The Plaintiff
does not dispute any of the above, but instead argues that the
Motion should be denied as to putative class members who did not
sign arbitration agreements or who signed after April 20, 2022.

To the extent the Plaintiff seeks to represent those who signed
arbitration agreements after April 20, 2022, Judge England holds
that this argument fails because her claims lack typicality with
respect to putative Rule 23 plaintiffs who have signed the
arbitration agreement. As for those class members who did not sign
arbitration agreements, the class definition will need to be
narrowed to exclude putative class members who signed arbitration
agreements.

Therefore, the Defendant's Motion is granted based on the currently
defined class because the Plaintiff is not an adequate
representative and her claims lack typicality with respect to
putative Rule 23 class members who have signed arbitration
agreements.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 30, 2023 Memorandum & Order is
available at https://tinyurl.com/p5ur5amh from Leagle.com.


BMW OF NORTH: Armstrong Sues Over Defective Motor Vehicles
----------------------------------------------------------
SHEA ARMSTRONG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC; and BAYERISCHE
MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, Defendants, Case No.
2:23-cv-03046 (D.N.Y., June 2, 2023) is a class action against the
Defendants arising from a latent defect found in model year ("MY")
2017-2021 BMW 230i, 320i, 330i, 430i, 530i, and 540i vehicles
(hereafter, the "Class Vehicles").

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendants failed,
despite their longstanding knowledge to disclose to the Plaintiff
and other consumers that the Class Vehicles contain a defectively
designed and manufactured coolant line ("Coolant Line") that causes
it to prematurely fail when exposed to normal engine operating
temperatures. When the Defect manifests, it causes the Coolant Line
to fracture and leak coolant, which causes the engines in the Class
Vehicles to overheat, resulting in stalling or sudden and
catastrophic engine failure ("Coolant Line Defect" or "Defect"),
says the Plaintiff.

The sudden and unexpected catastrophic engine stalling and failure
causes the Class Vehicles to unexpectedly stop, posing a danger to
the drivers and occupants of the Class Vehicles, and others who
share the road with them, as other vehicles can collide with the
Class Vehicles after they suddenly stop moving, the suit alleges.

BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC markets and sells motor vehicles. The
Company offers vehicle accessories and interior and exterior parts,
apparel and accessories for men, women, and kids, as well as offers
vehicle financing and leasing services. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Joseph G. Sauder, Esq.
          Matthew D. Schelkopf, Esq.
          Joseph B. Kenney, Esq.
          SAUDER SCHELKOPF LLC
          1109 Lancaster Avenue
          Berwyn, PA 19312
          Telephone: (610) 200-0581
          Facsimile: 610-421-1326
          Email: jgs@sstriallawyers.com
                 mds@sstriallawyers.com
                 jbk@sstriallawyers.com

BRIDGE LEGAL: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Blue Suit Alleges
----------------------------------------------------------
SHANIA BLUE; BOB MEGNATH; PEDRO PACHECO; TORI BUIE; and THERESA
JACKSON, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs v. BRIDGE LEGAL SUPPORT SERVICES LLC; BRIDGE LEGAL
HOLDINGS LLC; BRIDGE LEGAL TECHNOLOGY LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-03487
(N.D. Ill., June 2, 2023) seeks to recover from the Defendants
unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest, liquidated
damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor Standards
Act.

The Plaintiffs were employed by the Defendants as intake
specialists.

BRIDGE LEGAL GROUP (BLG) is a full-service law firm dedicated to
providing high standard legal support to its clients from its
offices located in Beirut, Dubai and Abu Dhabi and through a
regional network of selected law firms. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Andrew R. Frisch, Esq.
          MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
          55 E Monroe Street, Suite 3800
          Chicago, IL 60603
          Telephone: (954) WORKERS
          Facsimile: (954) 327-3013
          Email: AFrisch@forthepeople.com

               - and -

          Charles R. Ash, IV, Esq.
          ASH LAW, PLLC
          402 W. Liberty St.
          Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4388
          Telephone: (734) 234-5583
          Email: cash@nationalwagelaw.com

BRISTOL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: Westfield Files Suit in Mass. Super. Ct.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Bristol Community
College. The case is styled as Mark Westfield, individually and on
behalf of All others similarly situated v. Bristol Community
College, Case No. 2373CV00356 (Mass. Super. Ct., Bristol Cty., June
6, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Torts."

Bristol Community College -- https://www.bristolcc.edu/ -- is a
public institution in Fall River, Massachusetts.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          David Pastor, Esq.
          PASTOR LAW OFFICE, PC
          63 Atlantic Ave., 3d floor
          Boston, MA 02110

CARNIVAL CORPORATION: Oliver Suit Transferred to S.D. California
----------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Ariel Oliver, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Carnival Corporation, Case No.
2:22-cv-01855 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania, to the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of California on June 2, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:23-cv-01036-BAS-JLB to
the proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract for Contract
Dispute.

Carnival Corporation -- http://www.carnivalcorp.com/-- is a
British-American cruise operator with a combined fleet of over
ninety vessels across nine cruise line brands and one joint venture
with China State Shipbuilding Corporation.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gary F. Lynch, Esq.
          Carlson Lynch Sweet Kilpela & Carpenter, LLP
          1133 Penn Avenue, 5th Floor
          Pittsburgh, PA 15222
          Phone: (412) 322-9243
          Email: glynch@carlsonlynch.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Aravind Swaminathan
          ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
          701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5600
          Seattle, WA 98104
          Phone: (206) 839-4300
          Email: aswaminathan@orrick.com


CARVANA INC: Harvin Sues Over Deceptive Trade Practices
-------------------------------------------------------
SYRETTA ANGELIQUE HARVIN, DAVID WEAVER, JR., JOSEPH A. RIEDEL,
DASHAWN J. THORNE, o/b/o themselves and all other similarly
situated persons, Plaintiffs v. CARVANA, LLC, And BRIDGECREST
CREDIT COMPANY, LLC, And ALLY BANK, a Delaware corporation, And
WILMINGTON TRUST, National Association, CLASS ACTION not in its
individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the following Delaware
statutory trusts: CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2019-1,
CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2019-2, CARVANA AUTO
RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2019-3, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR
TRUST 2019-4, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2020-NP1,
CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2020-P1, CARVANA AUTO
RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2021-N1, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR
TRUST 2021-N2, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2021-N3,
CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2021-N4, CARVANA AUTO
RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2021-P1, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR
TRUST 2019-2, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2019-3,
CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2021-P2, CARVANA AUTO
RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2019-4, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR
TRUST 2021-P3, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2021-N4,
CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2022-N5, CARVANA AUTO
RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2022-N6, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR
TRUST 2022-P1, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2022-P2,
CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2022-P3, CARVANA AUTO
RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2022-P4, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR
TRUST 2022-P5, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2022-P6,
CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2023-P1, CARVANA AUTO
RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST 2023-N1, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST
2019-1, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2019-2, CARVANA AUTO
RECEIVABLES TRUST 2019 3, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2019-4,
FLEET STREET AUTO-4 2020 TRUST, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST
2021-P1, CARVANA LLC, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES GRANTOR TRUST
2022-N4, FLEET STREET AUTO-3 2020 TRUST, FLEET STREET AUTO TRUST
2022-1, CARVANA RECEIVABLES DEPOSITOR LLC, CARVANA FAC LLC, CARVANA
AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2022-P6, CARVANA AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST
2022-N5, SONORAN AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2016-1, SONORAN AUTO
RECEIVABLES TRUST 2017-1 TERM, SONORAN AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST
2018-1 TERM, and UNKNOWN TRUSTS NO. 1-100, Defendants, Case No.
2:23-cv-02068 (E.D. Pa., May 31, 2023), arises out of the
Defendants' violations of the common law and the Pennsylvania
Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

On or around June 14, 2022, Plaintiff Harvin purchased online from
Defendant a 2016 Hyundai Sonata, VIN# ending in 5NPE24AA7GH338944
by executing a written retail installment contract. However,
Carvana failed to provide Harvin with her permanent registration as
it was required to do so pursuant to Plaintiff's payment for such
service reflected in the RISC.

Carvana LLC is a Georgia corporation regularly conducting business
nationally and in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in the
County of Philadelphia. Carvana is also a licensed used car dealer
required to comply with the laws of this Commonwealth. [BN]


The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Robert P. Cocco
          ROBERT P. COCCO, P.C.
          1500 Walnut Street, Suite 900
          Philadelphia, PA 19102
          Telephone: (215) 351-0200
          E-mail: bob.cocco@phillyconsumerlaw.com

                  -and -

          Phillip Robinson, Esq.
          CONSUMER LAW CENTER LLC
          10125 Colesville Road, Suite 378
          Silver Spring, MD 20901
          Telephone (301) 448-1304
          E-mail: phillip@marylandconsumer.com

CENTER FOR VEIN: Sued Over Unlawful Disclosure of Patients' Info
----------------------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. CENTER FOR VEIN RESTORATION (MD), LLC,
Defendant, Case No. 2:23-cv-02094 (E.D. Pa., June 1, 2023) alleges
claims for violations of the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and
Electronic Surveillance Control Act and Health Information
Portability and Accountability Act.

Center for Vein Restoration (CVR) operates a website for its
various medical facilities through which its patients may, among
other things, learn about vein disease and its treatments, schedule
appointments, and assess their own conditions and potential
treatments via an online questionnaire. The Patients communicate
their medical information via the site, including private and
confidential information regarding their medical conditions and
treatment. The Patients communicate their medical information via
the site, including private and confidential information regarding
their medical conditions and treatment, says the suit.

Unbeknownst to its patients, while using these online services, CVR
surreptitiously shares their private health information and
individually identifiable health information with Google Analytics,
a service that enables website owners to track patients' actions
during their site visits in order to target those patients with
personalized advertisements. Plaintiff Jane Doe seeks statutory
damages on her own behalf and that of a class of similarly situated
Pennsylvania residents to remedy CVR's violations of law.

CVR is a Maryland limited liability corporation with its principal
place of business in Greenbelt, Maryland. It maintains branch
operations in this District in Bensalem, Horsham, King of Prussia,
and Wayne. It was established in 2007 and now claims to operate
over 100 clinics in 22 states and serve 300,000 patients annually.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Lawrence J. Lederer, Esq.
          Bart D. Cohen, Esq.
          BAILEY GLASSER LLP
          1622 Locust Street
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Telephone: (215) 274-9420
          E-mail: llederer@baileyglasser.com
                  bcohen@baileyglasser.com

                  - and -

          John Roddy, Esq.
          BAILEY GLASSER LLP
          176 Federal Street, 5th Floor
          Boston, MA 02110
          Telephone: (617) 439-6730
          E-mail: jroddy@baileyglasser.com

CHAIN DRUG: Ashley Sues Over Mislabeled Adhesive Patches
--------------------------------------------------------
MATTHEW ASHLEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. CHAIN DRUG MARKETING ASSOCIATION, INC., Case
No. 1:23-cv-01486-LKG (D. Md., June 1, 2023) alleges that the
Defendant sells a misleading adhesive patches promising to deliver
4 per cent lidocaine under the Quality Choice brand ("Product").

According to the complaint, the Plaintiff relied on the words,
terms coloring, descriptions, layout, placement, packaging and
images on the Product, on the labeling, statements, omissions,
claims, statements, and instructions, made by Defendant or at its
directions, in digital, print and social media, which accompanied
the Product and separately, through in-store, digital, audio, and
print marketing.

The Product did not desensitize the Plaintiff's nerves, deliver 4
per cent lidocaine, nor stay put for anywhere close to 12 hours,
which rendered it unable to provide even temporary pain relief. As
a result of the false and misleading representations, the Product
is sold at a premium price, approximately no less than no less than
$9.50 for one package containing five patches, excluding tax and
sales, higher than similar products represented in a non-misleading
way, and higher than it would be sold for absent the misleading
representations and omissions, says the suit.

CHAIN DRUG MARKETING ASSOCIATION, INC. operates as a pharmaceutical
association. The Organization wholesales and distributes drugs
through its drug chains, independent pharmacies, regional drug
wholesalers, specialty distributors, and buying groups. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Spencer Sheehan, Esq.
          SHEEHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          60 Cuttermill Rd Ste 412
          Great Neck, NY 11021
          Telephone: (516) 268-7080
          Email: spencer@spencersheehan.com

CHAMBERS STREET CAVE: Hwang Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Chambers Street Cave,
Inc. The case is styled as Jenny Hwang, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated v. Chambers Street Cave, Inc., Case
No. 1:23-cv-04109 (E.D.N.Y., June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Chambers Street Cave, Inc. is a Domestic Business Corporation in
New York City.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          14749 71st Ave.
          Flushing, NY 11367
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


CITY WIDE PARKING: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Kaouris Suit Alleges
------------------------------------------------------------------
NICHOLAS KAOURIS AND GEORGE KAOURIS, individually and on behalf of
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. COUNTY OF NASSAU CITY WIDE
PARKING INC; CITY WIDE PARKING NYC INC; CITY WIDE PARKING INC
NASSAU, and/or any related entities, Defendants, Case No.
608798/2023 (N.Y. Sup., Nassau Cty., June 2, 2023) alleges claims
against the Defendants for violations of the New York Labor Law,
the New York Codes, Rules, and Regulations, the Hospitality Wage
Order and the Miscellaneous Wage Order.

Plaintiff Nicholas Kaouris was employed by Defendants as a valet
from approximately March 2019 until present with some periods of
time in which he was not working while Plaintiff George Kaouris was
employed by Defendants as a valet form approximately October 2015
through March 2020. Since June 2017, Defendants have engaged in a
policy and practice of failing to pay Plaintiffs and other
similarly situated employees for all hours worked, failing to pay
spread of hours, and failure to provide accurate wage statements,
as required by applicable state law, say the Plaintiffs.

Defendants own and/or operate a parking services enterprise
throughout New York State. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jeffrey K. Brown, Esq.
          Michael A. Tompkins, Esq.
          Anthony M. Alesandro, Esq.
          LEEDS BROWN LAW, P.C.
          One Old Country Road Suite 347
          Carle Place, NY 11514
          Telephone: (516)873-9550

COLETTE PETERS: Salinas Files Suit in N.D. West Virginia
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Colette Peters, et
al. The case is styled as Katie Salinas, inidividually and on
behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. Colette Peters,
Director of Bureau of Prisons in her Official Capacity; Warden
Lovett, Individual Capacity Hazelton Correctional Complex; All
staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving
and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex; Case
No. 5:23-cv-00221-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va., June 7, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Habeas Corpus (General) for
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal).

Colette S. Peters is the Director of the Federal Bureau of
Prisons.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


COLETTE PETERS: Thompson Files Suit in N.D. West Virginia
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Colette Peters, et
al. The case is styled as Tiffany Thompson, inidividually and on
behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. Colette Peters,
Director of Bureau of Prisons in her Official Capacity; Warden
Lovett, Individual Capacity Hazelton Correctional Complex; All
staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving
and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex; Case
No. 5:23-cv-00220-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va., June 7, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Habeas Corpus (General) for
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal).

Colette S. Peters is the Director of the Federal Bureau of
Prisons.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


COLONIAL LOGISTICS: Fails to Pay Overtime Premiums, Espiritu Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ROMMEL ESPIRITU and LEONARD HODGES, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. COLONIAL LOGISTICS,
LLC, AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., Defendants, Case
No. 5:23-cv-00722 (W.D. Tex., June 2, 2023) seeks all available
remedies under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiff Espiritu worked for Defendants as a Delivery Associate in
Texas from November 2018 to December 2018 while Plaintiff Leonard
Hodge also worked for Defendants as a Delivery Associate in Texas
from February 2019 to July 2019. The Plaintiffs regularly worked
more than 40 hours a week. The Plaintiffs also observed that other
Delivery Associates routinely worked similar hours. Allegedly, the
Defendants did not accurately record all time that Delivery
Associates spent working and, as such, Delivery Associates
performed work "off the clock." In addition, the Defendants did not
pay Plaintiffs and other Delivery Associates for all hours worked
in excess of 40 hours in a workweek and did not pay proper overtime
premiums, say the Plaintiffs.

Colonial Logistics, LLC is a limited liability company with
principal offices in Houston, Texas. Colonial maintains operations
throughout the state of Texas. The company supplies last-mile
delivery services to Amazon via its participation in Amazon's
Delivery Service Provider program. [BN]


The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen, Esq.
          Krysten Connon, Esq.
          LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
          29 Boylston St., Suite 2000
          Boston, MA 02116
          Telephone: (617) 994-5800
          Facsimile: (617) 994-5801
          E-mail: ssb@llrlaw.com
                  kconnon@llrlaw.om

                  - and -

          Michaela Wallin, Esq.
          Alexandra K. Piazza, Esq.
          BERGER MONTAGUE PC
          1818 Market Street, Suite 3600
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Telephone: (215) 875-3000
          Facsimile: (215) 875-4620
          E-mail: mwallin@bm.net
                  apiazza@bm.net

                  - and -

          Ryan Allen Hancock, Esq.
          WILLIG, WILLIAMS & DAVIDSON
          1845 Walnut Street, 24th Floor
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Telephone: (215) 656-3600
          Facsimile: (215) 567-2310
          E-mail: rhancock@wwdlaw.com

COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: Discloses Users' Private Info, Munoz Says
-------------------------------------------------------------------
CIEARA MUNOZ, individually and on behalf of all others similar
situated, Plaintiff v. COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL INC., an Illinois
entity d/b/a WWW.COMPASSION.COM, Defendant, Case No. 23STCV12470
(Cal. Super., Los Angeles Cty., June 2, 2023) arises out of the
Defendant's alleged violations of the Video Protection Privacy
Act.

The Defendant allegedly encourages consumers to watch videos on its
website at www.compassion.com. Each video is a "digital trojan
horse" that Defendant uses to secretly collect unique personally
identifiable information (PII) about visitors, which Defendant then
reports to Google alongside the title of every video watched. The
Defendant then monetizes the secretly-harvested PII by bombarding
unsuspecting visitors with targeted marketing based upon their
video viewing habits, says the suit.

Compassion International Inc. is an Illinois evangelical
organization with nearly $1 billion in annual revenues. The company
solicits donations via its website throughout the US and in Los
Angeles County via the use of compelling videos. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Scott J. Ferrell, Esq.
          PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS A Professional Corporation
          4100 Newport Place Drive, Ste. 800
          Newport Beach, CA 92660
          Telephone: (949) 706-6464
          Facsimile: (949) 706-6469
          E-mail: sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com

CONVENT 1 LLC: Woodson Damages to Be Calculated From Nov. 29, 2013
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, HEATH WOODSON, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents v. CONVENT 1 LLC, ET AL.,
Defendants-Respondents-Appellants, Index No. 160547/17, Appeal No.
16925, Case No. 2022-03114 (N.Y. App. Div.), the Appellate Division
of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department, modifies in
part and affirms in part the order of Judge Alexander M. Tisch of
the Supreme Court in New York County entered on July 11, 2022.

The order, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the
briefs, determined that the Plaintiffs and the class action members
were entitled only to damages that occurred prior to the filing of
the complaint, that current tenants were only members of the
"subclass" seeking lease reformation and that the subclass was
entitled only to declaratory relief, that certain class members had
received rent-stabilized leases, and that the Defendants engaged in
a fraudulent scheme to deregulate with respect to apartments 1B,
2C, and 5C.

The Appellate Division unanimously modified, on the law, to clarify
that the base date is Nov. 29, 2013, and that rent overcharge
damages for all class members are to be calculated from this base
date through the resolution of the action, (i) to clarify that the
Defendants must provide the tenants of all apartments with
rent-stabilized leases and riders in the form prescribed by the New
York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR); and
(ii) to deny the Plaintiffs' motion insofar as it sought summary
judgment on their claim that the Defendants engaged in a fraudulent
scheme to deregulate with respect to apartments 1B, 2C and 5C. The
Appellate Division otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to the motion court's determination, the Appellate
Division finds that the proper base date is Nov. 29, 2013 -- four
years before the filing of the original complaint on Nov. 29, 2017
-- under the law as it stood before the enactment of the Housing
Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (HSTPA) (L 2019, ch
36). Under the pre-HSTPA law, CPLR 213-a and Rent Stabilization
Code (RSC) (9 NYCRR) Section 2626.1(a)(2) provided for a strict
"lookback" period of four years from when the original complaint
was filed. That lookback period, however, did not preclude a court
from awarding damages for rent overcharges that accrued after the
action was commenced. Thus, the Appellate Division modifies the
order to clarify that the Plaintiffs' damages are to be calculated
from the base date of Nov. 29, 2013 through the conclusion of the
action.

As to the Plaintiffs' contention that the motion court erroneously
determined that current tenants were not entitled to rent
overcharges, the Appellate Division holds that the court merely
declined to address the overcharges and dealt solely with the
declaratory relief sought. It modifies the order and remands for
further proceedings for the calculation of current tenants' rent
overcharge damages accruing from the base date of Nov. 29, 2013
through the conclusion of the action.

About the court's determination that the tenants of apartments 1B,
3A, 4B, 4F, and 5E were previously afforded rent-stabilized leases,
the Appellate Division holds that the Plaintiffs are correct that
the rent-stabilized leases were not in the form approved by DHCR.
It, therefore, modifies the order to apply to all current tenants
the court's declaration that any leases offered by the Defendants
to the Plaintiffs and members of the Sub-Class are invalid and
unlawful unless they are offered on lease forms and terms
prescribed by DHCR.

However, with respect to the rent increases for 3A, 4B, 4F and 5E,
the Appellate Division says while the Defendants concede that they
may have made some overcharges, the motion court correctly
determined that the record on the Plaintiffs' summary judgment
motion does not establish as a matter of law that such overcharges
were part of a fraudulent scheme to remove an apartment from the
protections of rent stabilization which tainted the reliability of
the rent on the base date. In particular, the Plaintiffs did not
establish that the Defendants made any misrepresentation of
material fact in connection with the rent increases for these
units. That the increases were not justified by any major capital
improvements (MCI) or individual apartment improvements (IAI) does
not establish fraud, as there is no evidence that the Defendants
ever made a statement justifying the increases based on any MCI or
IAI and, in fact, the Defendants, in their interrogatory responses,
affirmatively denied making any such statement.

Furthermore, the Plaintiffs' claim that these units were unlawfully
"deregulated" after the base date is inaccurate. As the documents
attached to their moving papers demonstrate, the Appellate Division
says these units were registered with DHCR as rent stabilized
throughout the period when the Defendants were receiving J-51
benefits. The Defendants offered each of the tenants in these units
a lease that provided that the apartment is subject to the Rent
Stabilization Laws. That those leases may not have been in the form
required by the Rent Stabilization Code may impose certain
requirements on the Defendants, but it does not constitute a
"deregulation" of those units.

The motion court erred insofar as it granted the Plaintiffs summary
judgment determining that the Defendants engaged in a fraudulent
scheme with respect to apartments 1B, 2C, and 5C that would justify
using the Rent Stabilization Code default formula to determine
their legal rents and overcharges. The Appellate Division states
that the Plaintiffs did not put in a sworn statement by any of the
tenants or anyone with personal knowledge and failed to otherwise
demonstrate the elements of a claim of a fraudulent scheme. The
initial failure to treat these units as rent-stabilized upon
receipt of J-51 benefits, based on a misinterpretation of the law,
cannot be deemed fraudulent. As to the Defendants' delay in
re-registering the units after Roberts and Gersten, it cannot be
said that the record establishes fraud as a matter of law.

The Appellate Division also note that the motion court determined
that fraud was not established as to tenant Urisaka's 2014-2016
tenancy in apartment 1B and that the legal rent could be
established, and any overcharge could be calculated, without
resorting to the use of the default formula. Accordingly, in the
absence of the Plaintiffs' establishment of a fraudulent scheme
affecting the reliability of the base date rent, the legal rent and
any overcharge for the subsequent tenants in 1B should be based on
the determination of the same legal rent established for 1B on the
base date as will be used to determine Urisaka's claim.

The Appellate Division has considered the parties' remaining
contentions and finds them unavailing.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 30, 2023 Decision & Order is
available at https://tinyurl.com/vxjx4cxt from Leagle.com.

Newman Ferrara LLP, New York (Roger A. Sachar Jr. --
rsachar@nfllp.com -- of counsel), for the Appellants-Respondents.

Belkin Burden Goldman, LLP, New York (Magda L. Cruz --
mcruz@bbgllp.com -- of counsel), for the Respondents-Appellants.


CORELOGIC INC: Mismanages 401 (K) Retirement Funds, Sabana Says
---------------------------------------------------------------
DANNY SABANA, individually and as a representative of a Putative
Class of Participants and Beneficiaries, on behalf of all similarly
situated participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the CORELOGIC,
INC. 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN, Plaintiff v. CORELOGIC, INC., THE
RETIREMENT PLAN COMMITTEE OF CORELOGIC, INC. 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN,
and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants, Case No. 8:23-cv-00965 (C.D.
Cal., June 2, 2023) arises out of the Defendants' violations of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

Plaintiff Sabana alleges that the Defendants have breached their
fiduciary duties in the management, operation and administration of
401 (K) Savings Plan. He brings this action, on behalf of the
current and former employees / participants / beneficiaries of
Defendants' Plan to recover losses due to mismanagement of the 401k
retirement plan and certain selected funds. In addition, the paid
Fidelity unreasonable fees and failed to monitor Fidelity, and make
request for proposals from other recordkeepers. The Defendants
allegedly failed to exercise due care in selecting a fund's service
providers, the Plaintiff asserts.

Defendant CoreLogic, Inc. is a Delaware Corporation and the current
sponsor of the Plan. It maintains its principal place of business
at 40 Pacifica Avenue, Suite 900, Irvine, California. The company
is registered to do business in the State of California and
operates as a sponsor and administrator and/or fiduciary of the 401
(K) Savings Plan. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

            Christina A. Humphrey, Esq.
            Marcus J. Bradley, Esq.
            Robert N. Fisher, Esq.
            CHRISTINA HUMPHREY LAW, P.C.
            1117 State Street
            Santa Barbara, CA 93101
            Telephone: (805) 618-2924
            Facsimile: (805) 618-2939
            E-mail: christina@chumphreylaw.com
                    rob@chumphreylaw.com

                    - and -

            Kiley L. Grombacher, Esq.     
            BRADLEY/GROMBACHER, LLP
            31365 Oak Crest Dr., Suite 240
            Westlake Village, CA 91361
            Telephone: (805) 270-7100
            Facsimile: (805) 270-7589
            E-mail: mbradley@bradleygrombacher.com
                    kgrombacher@bradleygrombacher.com

CUBICLE ENTERPRISES: Hwang Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cubicle Enterprises,
LLC. The case is styled as Jenny Hwang, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated v. Cubicle Enterprises, LLC, Case No.
1:23-cv-04110-PKC-RML (E.D.N.Y., June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

TheCubicle.com -- https://www.thecubicle.com/ -- is a leading
USA-based online specialty cube store committed to providing
customers with a superior online shopping experience, excellent
puzzle variety, and an innovative cubing experience.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          14749 71st Ave.
          Flushing, NY 11367
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


CYCLE GEAR INC: Otat Suit Removed to N.D. California
----------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Isin Al Otat, an individual and on behalf of
similarly aggrieved employees v. CYCLE GEAR, INC., a California
corporation; COMOTO HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; COMOTO
HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES
1–50, inclusive; Case No. HHD-CV-23-6169060-S was removed from
the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San
Francisco, to the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California on June 7, 2023, and assigned Case No.
4:23-cv-02808-KAW.

The Complaint alleges nine causes of action: failure to provide
required meal periods; Failure to Provide Required Rest Periods;
Failure to Pay Minimum Wages; Failure to Pay Overtime; Failure to
Furnish Accurate Itemized Wage Statements; Waiting Time Penalties;
Failure to Pay Reporting Time Pay and California Code of
Regulations, Title 8; Wages Not Timely Paid; Unfair and Unlawful
Business Practices.[BN]

The Defendant is represented by:

          Wendy Sugg, Esq.
          SUGG LAW GROUP, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
          384 Forest Avenue, Suite 15
          Laguna Beach, CA 92651
          Phone: (949) 260-9548
          Email: wendy@sugglaw.com


D.P. PAVING: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Alonso Suit Alleges
-----------------------------------------------------------
JULIAN ANDRES MARTINEZ ALONSO, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. D.P. PAVING & CONCRETE
INC.; DANIEL PRENDERGAST; and MARIE MAHONY, Defendants, Case No.
1:23-cv-04075 (E.D.N.Y., June 1, 2023) seeks to recover from the
Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation, interest,
liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Plaintiff Alonso was employed by the Defendants as a concrete
worker.

D.P. PAVING & CONCRETE INC. specialize in all types of groundwork
services - paving, maintenance, sealcoating, striping, asphalt and
concrete company. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Roman Avshalumov, Esq.
          HELEN F. DALTON & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          80-02 Kew Gardens Road, Suite 601
          Kew Gardens, NY 11415
          Telephone: (718) 263-9591

DAVID DAWDY: Smith Files Suit in W.D. Michigan
----------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against David Dawdy, et al.
The case is styled as Christopher Carson Smith, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated v. David Dawdy,
Corrections Mental Health Program Director official and personal
capacity; Heidi Washington, MDOC Director official capacity; Greg
Johnson, Corrections Mental Health Program Involuntary Treatment
personal capacity; Jennifer Zaha, Corrections Mental Health Program
Appeal Appointed Designee personal capacity; Grand Prairie
Healthcare Services, Corrections Mental Health Program and Medical
Provider personal capacity; Melanie A. Clark, Psychiatrist personal
capacity; Hanna Saad, Psychiatrist personal capacity; Siming
Hummer, Psychiatrist personal capacity; Kevin Francies,
Psychologist personal capacity; Joan McDevitt, Mental Health
Professional personal capacity; Sara Heydens, Corrections Mental
Health Rights Specialist personal capacity; Connie Lester, RHIT
personal capacity; Gail Burch, Mental Health Unit Chief, LLP,
Psychologist personal capacity; J. Rohrig, Grievance Coordinator /
Hearings Investigator personal capacity; Michael Barrett, Assistant
Corrections Mental Health Program Director personal capacity; A.
Kowalkowski, Psychiatrist personal capacity; M. Singhurse,
Psychologist personal capacity; L. Bresett, Mental Health
Professional personal capacity; Gabrielle McCall, Mental Health
Advisor personal capacity; Kirtida A. Patel, Psychiatrist personal
capacity, Case No. 1:23-cv-00575-PJG (W.D. Mich., June 5, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Prison Condition for Prisoner Civil
Rights.

David Dawdy is a distinguished hydrologist, with over 60 years of
experience in research, teaching and consulting.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


DISH NETWORK: Cardenas Files Suit in D. Colorado
------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against DISH Network, LLC.
The case is styled as Michael Cardenas, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated v. DISH Network, LLC, Case No.
1:23-cv-01405 (D. Colo., June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

DISH Network Corporation -- http://www.dish.com/-- is an American
television provider and the owner of the direct-broadcast satellite
provider Dish, commonly known as Dish Network, and the over-the-top
IPTV service, Sling TV. Additionally, Dish offers mobile wireless
service, Dish Wireless.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Philip Joseph Krzeski, Esq.
          CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA
          100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1700
          Minneapolis, MN 55401
          Phone: (612) 767-3613
          Fax: (612) 336-2940
          Email: pkrzeski@chestnutcambronne.com


DISH NETWORK: Fails to Protect Employees' Info, Ellerbrock Says
---------------------------------------------------------------
ALAN ELLERBROCK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, a Nevada
corporation, Defendant, Case No. 1:23-cv-01372-PAB (D. Colo., May
31, 2023) alleges claims for negligence, negligence per se, breach
of contract, breach of implied contract, and violations of the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Federal
Trade Commission Act.

On or about May 15, 2023, Dish sent letters to its current and
former employees notifying them of the same Data Breach and the
resulting compromise of their (and their family members') highly
sensitive personal information. Plaintiff Ellerbrock brings this
class action lawsuit to address Dish's inadequate safeguarding of
Class Members' Private Information that it collected and
maintained. He seeks remedies including, but not limited to,
compensatory damages, reimbursement of out-of-pocket costs, and
injunctive relief including improvements to Dish's data security
systems, future annual audits, and adequate credit monitoring
services funded by Dish.

DISH, based in Englewood, CO, is a satellite television company
that serves nearly 10 million customers from around the country.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

           Gary M. Klinger, Esq.
           MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN PLLC
           227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2100
           Chicago, IL 60606
           Telephone: (866) 252-087
           E-mail: gklinger@milberg.com

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: Clark et al. Sue Over Breach of Contract
--------------------------------------------------------------
RICARDO CLARK, MELISSA TURNER, MICHAEL TIMMONS, VANCE PITTS, JR.,
STEPHEN TURNER, On behalf of themselves and all similarly situated
individuals, Plaintiffs v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant, Case
No. 1:23-cv-01564 (D.D.C., June 1, 2023) alleges claims against the
District of Columbia's Fire and Emergency Services for violations
of the District of Columbia Code, breach of contract, breach of
implied contract, promissory estoppel, quantum merit/unjust
enrichment, conversion of funds and negligence.

The Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and those
similarly situated, to enforce their rights under District of
Columbia Code, to enforce the written contract between themselves
and Defendant, and to pursue any quasi-contract and/or tort claims
for the conversion of funds that were appropriated for their earned
benefits. Specifically, Plaintiffs seek an order from the Court
mandating that Defendant live up to its statutory and contractual
obligations to Plaintiffs, and fully fund the defined benefit plan
for each of them. The Plaintiffs also allege that the Defendant,
intentionally and with malice, chose to breach its obligations to
Plaintiffs because of their race, African American.

District of Columbia Fire and Emergency Services provides fire
protection and emergency medical services. The agency's
responsibilities include providing fire suppression, ambulance
service, and hazardous materials containment. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Pamela M. Keith, Esq.
          CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT JUSTICE
          650 Massachusetts Ave. NW Suite 600
          Telephone: (202) 800-0292
          Facsimile: (202) 807-5275
          E-mail: pamkeith@centerforemploymentjustice.com

DOTHAN SECURITY: Ruiz Sues Over Unpaid Minimum, Overtime Wages
--------------------------------------------------------------
Miguel Jonas Ruiz, on behalf of the State of California, and others
similarly situated and aggrieved v. DOTHAN SECURITY, INC., an
Alabama Corporation; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Case No.
23STCV12886 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 6, 2023), is brought against the
Defendants for unpaid minimum and overtime wages.

The Defendant failed to compensate the Plaintiff and Aggrieved
Employees for all hours worked, resulting in the underpayment of
minimum and overtime wages. the Defendant failed to compensate the
Plaintiff and Aggrieved Employees for all hours worked by virtue
of, the Defendant' automatic deduction and time rounding policies,
and failure to relieve employees of all duties/employer control
during unpaid meal periods or otherwise unlawful practices for
missed or improper meal periods, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff worked for the Defendant as a security guard, field
supervisor, and/or similar title(s) at various job sites/locations
in California.

The Defendant own, operate, and/or manage a business that provides
security services, including but not limited to, uniformed security
services, electronic security and consulting services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Zachary Crosner, Esq.
          Jamie Serb, Esq.
          Sepideh Ardestani, Esq.
          CROSNER LEGAL, P.C.
          9440 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 301
          Beverly Hills, CA 90210
          Phone: (866) 276-7637
          Fax: (310) 510-6429
          Email: mike@crosnerlegal.com
                 jamie@crosnerlegal.com
                 sepideh@crosnerlegal.com


DX ENTERPRISES: Court Denies Bids to Dismiss & Stay McClaine Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, HEATHER McCLAINE, Plaintiff v. DX ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Defendant, Case No. 23-cv-1168-DWD (S.D. Ill.), Judge David W.
Dugan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Illinois denies the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as moot and
denies its Motion to Stay Proceedings.

In this putative class action, McClain, on behalf of herself and
all other persons similarly situated, seek relief against DX
Enterprises pursuant to the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy
Act, 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 14/1, et seq. ("BIPA"). Now before
the Court are the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Stay
Proceedings.

On May 5, 2023, the Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's
Class Action Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). On May
24, 2023, the Plaintiff filed her First Amended Class Action
Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B) permits a party to amend
their pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days after
service of a motion under Rule 12(b). As the Plaintiff's filing of
her Amended Complaint appears to comply with this section, Judge
Dugan holds that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is no longer
directed at the operative complaint. Therefore, he denies it as
moot and without prejudice.

Further, Judge Dugan denies the Defendant's Motion to Stay
Proceeding. The Defendant argues that a stay of proceedings is
appropriate while the Illinois Supreme Court considers a request
for rehearing in the case Cothron v. White Castle System, Inc.
(Illinois Supreme Court No. 20-3202). In Cothron, the Illinois
Supreme Court resolved the question of when claims accrue under
Sections 15(b) and 15(d).

Although Judge Dugan is mindful that the pending petition for
rehearing means the Cothron decision is not yet final, and is
subject to modification, he finds that the competing interests of
the parties and the judicial system do not warrant a stay of
proceedings at this time. Indeed, as the Defendant correctly notes,
the case is still in its initial pleading stage.

While a rehearing decision in Cothron may ultimately impact
questions of scope and damages in the matter, at this junction the
Court observes no particular circumstances which would justify a
stay at this time. Nor has the Defendant sufficiently indicated the
precise threshold issue or discovery burden it seeks to mitigate by
a stay. Thus, Judge Dugan refuses to issue a stay based upon
speculation of harm. The Defendant may, however, renew its request
in the future as the case progresses and if appropriate
circumstances exist to justify a stay.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 30, 2023 Memorandum & Order is
available at https://tinyurl.com/4c3bu8k5 from Leagle.com.


DYSON INC: Castiel Sues Over Unlawful Repair Restriction
--------------------------------------------------------
ELISE CASTIEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. DYSON, INC., Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-03477 (N.D. Ill., June 1, 2023) alleges claims against
Defendant for violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, unjust
enrichment, fraud, fraudulent omission, and violations of the New
York's General Business Law.

In or about January 2020, Ms. Castiel purchased one Dyson V7
Cordless Vacuum Cleaner from a Home Depot in Ridgewood, NY for
$299. Ms. Castiel purchased the vacuum cleaner, reasonably
believing its warranty complied with state and federal law.
However, the vacuum cleaner Ms. Castiel purchased did not comply
with state and federal law because of the unlawful repair
restriction attached to the warranty that prohibited her from
repairing it. By performing minor disassembly of the vacuum cleaner
and removing the blockages in an attempt to fix the clogged filter,
Ms. Castiel voided the warranty coverage of her product during the
warranty period. Because Ms. Castiel's warranty has been unlawfully
voided according to the terms of Defendant's warranty, Ms.
Castiel's product was without warranty. This devalued Ms. Castiel's
Product since a product that includes a warranty is worth more than
a product that does not include a warranty, says the suit.

Dyson, Inc. is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of
business in Chicago, Illinois. The company designs, manufactures
and distributes consumer products that include vacuum cleaners,
hair care products, air purifiers, and lamps sold under the "Dyson"
brand name. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

              Carl V. Malmstrom, Esq.
              111 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1700
              Chicago, IL 60604
              Telephone: (312) 984-0000
              Facsimile: (212) 686-0114
              E-mail: malmstrom@whafh.com

                      - and -

              L. Timothy Fisher, Esq.
              BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
              1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
              Walnut Creek, CA 94596
              Telephone: (925) 300-4455
              Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
              E-mail: ltfisher@bursor.com

                      - and -

              Max S. Roberts, Esq.
              Julian C. Diamond, Esq.
              BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
              1330 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
              New York, NY 10019
              Telephone: (646) 837-7150
              Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
              E-mail: mroberts@bursor.com
                      jdiamond@bursor.com

                      - and -

              Kevin Laukaitis, Esq.
              LAUKAITIS LAW LLC
              954 Avenida Ponce De Leon Suite 205, #10518
              San Juan, Puerto Rico 00907

DYWIDAG SYSTEMS: Vandermost Suit Removed to S.D. California
-----------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Kimberly Dawn Vandermost, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated, and the general public,
and as an “aggrieved employee” on behalf of other “aggrieved
employees” and the State of California under the Labor Code
Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 v. DYWIDAG SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL, USA, INC., a New York corporation; and DOES 1-50,
inclusive, Case No. 23STCV06697 was removed from the Superior Court
of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, to the
United States District Court for the Southern District of
California on June 5, 2023, and assigned Case No. 8:23-cv-00979.

The Plaintiff alleges that Dywidag "failed to promptly pay her and
all other Class Members with their final wages within the time
limits prescribed by Labor Code section 203." The Plaintiff alleges
that her employment ended on April 4, 2022, but she was not paid
her final wages until May 5, 2022. The Plaintiff further alleges
that Dywidag’s failure to timely pay wages at termination was
willful.[BN]

The Defendant is represented by:

          John F. Kuenstler, Esq.
          Caroline C. Dickey, Esq.
          Rochelle L. Calderon, Esq.
          BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
          2029 Century Park East, Suite 300
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Phone: (310) 284-3880
          Facsimile: (310) 284-3894
          Email: john.kuenstler@btlaw.com
                 caroline.dickey@btlaw.com
                 rochelle.calderon@btlaw.com


ESCAPE NAILS: Fails to Pay Overtime Wages, Li Suit Alleges
----------------------------------------------------------
WEIDONG LI, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. ESCAPE NAILS & SPA, LLC; and LINH TUONG
NGUYEN, Defendants, Case No. 8:23-cv-01487-GLS (D. Md., June 1,
2023) arises out of the Defendant's alleged violations of the Fair
Labor Standards Act, the Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law,
and the Maryland Wage and Hour Law.

Plaintiff Weidong Li was employed by Defendants to work as a nail
technician at Defendants' nail salon located at 3039 Waldorf Market
Place Waldorf, Maryland. Allegedly, the Defendants failed to pay
Plaintiff his lawful overtime compensation of one and one-half
times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a
given workweek. In addition, the Defendants violated the Maryland
Code of Labor and Employment for failing to furnish Plaintiff a
wage notice at his time of hiring, says the suit.

Escape Nails & Spa, LLC is a domestic business corporation
organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

            John Troy, Esq.
            Aaron Schweitzer, Esq.
            Tiffany Troy, Esq.
            TROY LAW, PLLC
            41-25 Kissena Boulevard Suite 110
            Flushing, NY 11355
            Telephone: (718) 762-1324

ESSENTIAL STAFFING: Minor Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Essential Staffing,
LLC, et al. The case is styled as Rochell Minor, on behalf of
himself and others similarly situated and/or aggrieved employees of
Defendants v. Essential Staffing, LLC, Does 1-50, Case No.
23CV002901 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., June 7, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case."

Essential Staffing LLC -- https://essentialstaffing.net/ -- is a
staffing agency provider that services in the Sacramento area.[BN]


FANTASIA TRADING: Bassaw Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fantasia Trading LLC.
The case is styled as Shivan Bassaw, individually, and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. Fantasia Trading LLC, Case No.
1:23-cv-04668-JLR (S.D.N.Y., June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Fantasia Trading LLC doing business as Anker --
https://en.anker-in.com/ -- is the global leader in charging
technology.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Patrick William Gallagher, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          225 Broadway, Ste. 39th Floor
          New York, NY 10007
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: pgallagher@mizrahikroub.com


FIRMENICH SA: B & E Sues Over Fragrances' Price Monopoly
--------------------------------------------------------
B & E ASSOCIATES, INC., individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. FIRMENICH SA; FIRMENICH
INCORPORATED; AGILEX FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES, INC.; GIVAUDAN SA;
GIVAUDAN FRAGRANCES CORPORATION; GIVAUDAN ROURE (UNITED STATES)
INC.; UNGERER & COMPANY, INC.; CUSTOM ESSENCE INCORPORATED;
INTERNATIONAL FLAVOR & FRAGRANCE INC.; SYMRISE AG; and SYMRISE
INC., Defendants, Case No. 2:23-cv-03050 (D.N.J., June 2, 2023)
alleges Defendants' violation of the Sherman Act.

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendants are
engaged in conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the
prices for "Fragrances" sold in the United States from January 1,
2018 to present (the "Class Period").

The Defendants entered into an unlawful agreement to increase
Fragrance prices charged to the Plaintiff and the class. The
Defendants' conspiracy to fix prices for Fragrances began in
response to increased costs of the raw materials needed to
manufacture Fragrances. To protect their profitability, Defendants
secretly coordinated with each other on their pricing policy for
customers, allocated certain customers, and coordinated supply
restraints for Fragrances. Through their unlawful coordination, the
Defendants imposed supracompetitive prices on customers, like the
Plaintiff and the class, without fear of losing market share, says
the suit.

FIRMENICH SA distributes fragrances, flavors, and chemicals. The
Company produces fragrances for perfumes, hair care and laundry
products, and air fresheners, flavors for beverages, sweets and
other foods, and chemicals used to produce fragrances and flavors.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          James E. Cecchi
          CARELLA, BRYNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN,
          BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C.
          5 Becker Farm Road
          Roseland, NJ 07068
          Telephone: (973) 994-1700
          Email: jcecchi@carellabyrne.com

               - and -

          Christopher M. Burke, Esq.
          Walter Noss, Esq.
          Yifan (Kate) Lv, Esq.
          KOREIN TILLERY PC
          707 Broadway, Suite 1410
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 6225-5620
          Email: cburke@koreintillery.com
                 wnoss@koreintillery.com
                 klv@koreintillery.com

               - and -

          Stephen Tillery, Esq.
          Carol O'Keefe, Esq.
          KOREIN TILLERY LLC
          505 North 7th Street, Suite 3600
          St. Louis, MO 63101
          Telephone: (314) 241-4844
          Email: stillery@koreintillery.com
                 COkeefe@koreintillery.com

               - and -

          Allan Steyer, Esq.
          D. Scott Macrae, Esq.
          Alexander Kullar, Esq.
          STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS
          ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP
          235 Pine Street, 15th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94104
          Telephone: (415) 421-3400
          Email: asteyer@steyerlaw.com
                 smacrae@steyerlaw.com
                 akullar@steyerlaw.com

               - and -

          Brian D. Clark, Esq.
          Simeon A. Morbey, Esq.
          Arielle S. Wagner, Esq.
          LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P.
          100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 2200
          Minneapolis, MN 55401
          Telephone: (612) 339-6900
          Email: bdclark@locklaw.com
                 samorbey@locklaw.com
                 aswagner@locklaw.com

               - and -

          Amelia F. Burroughs, Esq.
          BURROUGHS LEGAL
          P.O. Box 1465
          Ferndale, CA 95536
          Telephone: (707) 845-9393
          Email: amelia@burroughslegal.com

FIRST HORIZON: Amicarelli Sues Over Drop in Share Price
-------------------------------------------------------
ANDREW AMICARELLI, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. FIRST HORIZON CORPORATION; D.
BRYAN JORDAN; HOPE DMUCHOWSKI; THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK; TD BANK
US HOLDING COMPANY; BHARAT B. MASRANI; KELVIN VI LUAN TRAN; and LEO
SALOM, Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-03024 (D.N.J., June 1, 2023) is
a federal securities class action on behalf of a class ("Class")
consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that
purchased or otherwise acquired FHN securities between February 28,
2022 and May 3, 2023, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"),
seeking to recover damages from the Defendants for their violations
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendants'
materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning
the risks to regulatory approval of the Transaction posed by TD
Bank US Holding Company ("TD Bank US") materially deficient
anti-money laundering ("AML") policies and procedures caused the
Plaintiff and other Class members to suffer significant losses when
these undisclosed regulatory risks materialized and caused the
market value of FHN's securities to decline precipitously.

FHN's stock price allegedly fell $4.99 per share, or 33.16 per
cent, to close at $10.06 per share on May 4, 2023.

First Horizon Corporation provides financial services. The Company
offers commercial banking services, as well as mortgage banking,
capital markets, and transaction processing solutions. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Thomas H. Przybylowski, Esq.
          POMERANTZ LLP
          600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
          New York, NY 10016
          Telephone: (212) 661-1100
          Facsimile: (917) 463-1044
          Email: tprzybylowski@pomlaw.com

FITBIT LLC: Foster, Hunter Sue Over Missing Facts in Product Labels
-------------------------------------------------------------------
BETTYE FOSTER and DEBORAH HUNTER, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. FITBIT LLC, Defendant,
Case No. 3:23-cv-02753-LB (N.D. Cal., June 2, 2023) alleges claims
against the Defendants for violations of the California's Consumers
Legal Remedies Act, Consumers Unfair Competition Law, and the False
Advertising Law, and for unjust enrichment and breaches of express
and implied warranties.

The Defendant does not provide any disclaimer relevant to the
inaccuracies in Fitness Trackers' SpO2 measurement depending on
skin tone. Despite the technological disparities based on skin
color, the pricing for the Fitness Trackers has remained the same
regardless of purchaser. Accordingly, the Defendant misrepresented,
omitted, and concealed these stark inaccuracies to consumers,
including Plaintiffs and Class members, by not including a
disclaimer on the website, packaging, instructions, or otherwise
warning of this disparity.

Fitbit LLC is a limited liability company organized and existing
under the laws of the state of Delaware, with its principal place
of business in San Francisco, California. It manufactures, sells,
and/or distributes Fitbit-brand products, and is responsible for
the advertising, marketing, trade dress, and packaging of Fitness
Trackers. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          L. Timothy Fisher, Esq.
          Jenna L. Gavenman, Esq.
          Emily A. Horne, Esq.
          BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
          1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
          Walnut Creek, CA 94596
          Telephone: (925) 300-4455
          Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
          E-mail: ltfisher@@bursor.com
                  jgavenman@bursor.com
                  ehorne@bursor.com

FORD MOTOR: Garrison Builders Suit Transferred to E.D. Michigan
---------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Garrison Builders, LLC, Sanderson Services, LLC,
on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. Ford Motor
Company, Case No. 2:22-cv-03664 was transferred from the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, to the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on June 2,
2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-11323-MFL-DRG to
the proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Personal Property for Motor
Vehicle Product Liability.

Ford Motor Company -- http://www.ford.com/-- is an American
multinational automobile manufacturer headquartered in Dearborn,
Michigan.[BN]

FORD MOTOR: Gurrola Sues Over Vehicles' Safety Issue Nondisclosure
------------------------------------------------------------------
RICARDO B. GURROLA and MARLEINET T. GURROLA, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. FORD
MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-03438 (N.D. Ill., May 31, 2023) alleges claims for the
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, common law breach of express and
implied warranties, and violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud
and Deceptive Business Practices Act.

The Plaintiffs claim that the Defendant failed to disclose material
facts and a significant safety issue of its Ford E-Series Cutaway,
an incomplete vehicle advertised to be used for a wide range of
commercial and recreational applications, including recreational
vehicles (RV), box trucks, and ambulances. The Plaintiffs obtained
aftermarket parts to align the vehicle because the Cutaway's caster
and camber are not adjustable as marketed and represented by Ford.
In addition, the Cutaway cannot tolerate its stated gross vehicle
weight rating as designed and manufactured by Ford. The Plaintiffs
were required to pay $1,836 to add parts to his RV so that it can
be properly aligned, says the suit.

Ford Motor Co. is a corporation organized and incorporated in the
State of Delaware with its principal place of business and
headquarters located at 1 American Road, Dearborn, Michigan. The
company designs, manufacturers, markets, distributes, warranties,
and sells Ford automobiles and parts for those automobiles. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

            Kenneth A. Wexler, Esq.
            Eaghan S. Davis, Esq.
            WEXLER BOLEY & ELGERSMA LLP
            311 S. Wacker Drive–Ste. 5450
            Chicago, IL, 60606
            Telephone: (312) 346-2222
            E-mail: kaw@wbe-llp.com
                    esd@wbe-llp.com

                    - and -   

            E. Powell Miller, Esq.
            Dennis A. Lienhardt, Esq.
            THE MILLER LAW FIRM, P.C.
            950 West University Drive, Suite 300
            Rochester, MI 48307
            Telephone: (248) 841-2200
            Facsimile: (248) 652-2852
            E-mail: epm@millerlawpc.com
                    dal@millerlawpc.com

                    - and -

            Simon B. Paris, Esq.
            Patrick Howard
            SALTZ, MONGELUZZI, & BENDESKY, P.C.
            1650 Market Street, 52nd Floor
            Philadelphia, PA 19103
            Telephone: (215) 496-8282
            Facsimile: (215) 496-0999
            E-mail: sparis@smbb.com
                    phoward@smbb.com

                    - and -

            Daniel E. Gustafson, Esq.
            GUSTAFSON GLUEK PLLC
            Canadian Pacific Plaza
            120 S. Sixth St., Suite 2600
            Minneapolis, MN 55402
            Telephone: (612) 333-8844
            Facsimile: (612) 339-6622
            E-mail: dgustafson@gustafsongluek.com

G&G DISTRIBUTION: Toro Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against G&G Distribution,
Inc. The case is styled as Andrew Toro, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated v. G&G Distribution, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-04688 (S.D.N.Y., June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

G&G Distribution Inc manufactures, distributes, and imports pet
supplies.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          10826 64th Avenue, Ste. 2nd Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


GATE GOURMET: Fails to Pay Proper Wages to Drivers, Fiallo Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lazaro G. Fiallo, and other Similarly situated individuals,
Plaintiff v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-22025-XXXX (S.D. Fla., May 31, 2023) arises out of the
Defendant's violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Defendant Gate Gourmet employed Plaintiff Lazaro G. Fiallo as a
non-exempted, full-time employee from on or about November 13,
2021, to May 13, or 78 weeks. The Plaintiff had duties as a
delivery driver delivering catering and supplies for airlines at
the airport. During his employment with Defendant, Plaintiff worked
five days per week, a total of 40 or more hours. He was paid for
all his working hours and overtime hours. However, Plaintiff
suffered illegal deductions and he complained about this illegal
practice, and as a consequence, he suffered an adverse employment
action and was fired, says the suit.

The Plaintiff seeks to recover retaliatory damages, liquidated
damages, and any other relief allowable by law. In addition,
Plaintiff claims the reimbursement of any illegal deduction.

Gate Gourmet is a foreign profit corporation authorized to perform
business in Florida. It has a place in West Palm Beach County,
Florida. It provides airline catering solutions and provisioning
services for airlines and airport lounges. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

              Zandro E. Palma, Esq.
              ZANDRO E. PALMA, P.A.
              9100 S. Dadeland Blvd. Suite 1500
              Miami, FL 33156
              Telephone: (305) 446-1500
              Facsimile: (305) 446-1502
              E-mail: zep@thepalmalawgroup.com

GATE GOURMET: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Fiallo Suit Alleges
------------------------------------------------------------
LAZARO G. FIALLO, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. GATE GOURMET, INC., Defendant,
Case No. 9:23-cv-80852-DMM (S.D. Fla., May 31, 2023) seeks to
recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime compensation,
interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs under the
Fair Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiff Fiallo was employed by the Defendant as a delivery
driver.

GATE GOURMET, INC. provides airline catering and provisioning
services. The Company offers logistics support services to their
customers. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Zandro E. Palma, Esq.
          ZANDRO E. PALMA, P.A.
          9100 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1500
          Miami, FL 33156
          Telephone: (305) 446-1500
          Facsimile: (305) 446-1502
          Email: zep@thepalmalawgroup.com

GAYNOR MINDEN: Alexandria Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Gaynor Minden, Inc.
The case is styled as Erika Alexandria, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated v. Gaynor Minden, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-04802 (S.D.N.Y., June 7, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Gaynor Minden is the trade name of Gaynor Minden, Inc., an American
company that makes shoes, clothing, accessories, and training aids
for dancers.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          10826 64th Avenue, Ste. 2nd Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS: Haak Suit Transferred to E.D. Wisconsin
--------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Daniel Haak, individually and behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Generac Power Systems, Inc., Case No.
8:22-cv-02470 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
Middle District of Florida, to the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Wisconsin on June 5, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-00685-LA to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Prop. Damage Prod. Liability.

Generac -- https://www.generac.com/ -- is a leading energy
technology company that provides advanced power grid software
solutions, backup and prime power systems for home and
industrial.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Matthew L. Baldwin, Esq.
          VARGAS GONZALEZ BALDWIN DELOMBARD, LLP
          2745 W Fairbanks Avenue, First Floor
          Winter Park, FL 32789
          Phone: (407) 603-7940
          Fax: (407) 603-7943

               - and -

          James Jonathan Rosemergy, Esq.
          CAREY, DANIS & LOWE
          8235 Forsyth, Suite 1100
          St. Louis, MO 63105
          Phone: 314-725-7700
          Fax: 314-721-0905
          Email: jrosemergy@careydanis.com

               - and -

          Jacob Alex Flint, Esq.
          JACOB FLINT LAW
          2 CityPlace Dr. #200
          St. Louis, MO 63141
          Phone: 314-677-7613
          Email: jacob@jacobflintlaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Elspeth V. Hansen, Esq.
          MAYER BROWN LLP
          3000 El Camino Real
          Two Palo Alto Sq-Ste 300
          Palo Alto, CA 94306
          Phone: (650) 331-2000
          Email: ehansen@mayerbrown.com

               - and -

          Michael J. Gill, Esq.
          Michael A. Olsen, Esq.
          MAYER BROWN LLP
          71 S Wacker Dr
          Chicago, IL 60606-4637
          Phone: (513) 579-6400
          Fax: (513) 579-6457
          Email: mgill@mayerbrown.com
                 molsen@mayerbrown.com

               - and -

          Samantha Crawford Duke, Esq.
          RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL, PA
          300 S Orange Ave Ste 1400
          Orlando, FL 32801
          Phone: (407) 839-2102
          Fax: (407) 835-2042
          Email: sduke@rumberger.com


GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS: Moon Suit Transferred to E.D. Wisconsin
--------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Dustin Moon, as an individual and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. Generac Power Systems, Inc.,
Generac Holdings Inc., Case No. 3:22-cv-09183 was transferred from
the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, to
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on
June 7, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-00684-LA to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract.

Generac Holdings Inc. -- https://www.generac.com/ -- commonly
referred to as Generac, is a Fortune 1000 American manufacturer of
backup power generation products for residential, light commercial
and industrial markets.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          William A. Kershaw, Esq.
          Ian James Barlow, Esq.
          Stuart C. Talley, Esq.
          KERSHAW TALLEY BARLOW PC
          401 Watt Ave-Ste 1
          Sacramento, CA 95864
          Phone: (916) 779-7000
          Fax: (916) 244-4829
          Email: bill@ktblegal.com
                 ian@ktblegal.com
                 stuart@ktblegal.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Elspeth V Hansen
          MAYER BROWN LLP
          3000 El Camino Real
          Two Palo Alto Sq-Ste 300
          Palo Alto, CA 94306
          Phone: (650) 331-2000
          Email: ehansen@mayerbrown.com


GEORGE SUPER TOPCO: Black Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against George Super TopCo,
LLC. The case is styled as Jahron Black, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated v. George Super TopCo, LLC, Case No.
1:23-cv-04207 (E.D.N.Y., June 7, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

George Super TopCo, LLC is a Foreign Limited Liability Company from
Miami Beach in Florida.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          14749 71st Ave.
          Flushing, NY 11367
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


GIVAUDAN SA: Candle Shoppe Sues Over Fragrances' Price Monopoly
---------------------------------------------------------------
CANDLE SHOPPE OF THE POCONOS, INC., individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. GIVAUDAN S.A.; GIVAUDAN
FRAGRANCES CORPORATION; GIVAUDAN FLAVORS CORPORATION; UNGERER &
COMPANY, INC.; INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.; SYMRISE AG;
SYMRISE INC.; SYMRISE US LLC; FIRMENICH INTERNATIONAL S.A.;
FIRMENICH INCORPORATED; and AGILEX FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES, INC.,
Defendants, Case No. 2:23-cv-03049 (D.N.J., June 2, 2023) alleges
Defendants' violation of the Sherman Act.

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendants are
engaged in price fixing conspiracy to protect their earnings in the
face of the rising cost of raw materials. Defendants were
successful in first stabilizing and then increasing prices.

In furtherance of their conspiracy, the Defendants have each
implemented significant prices increases during the Class Period.
The Plaintiffs and members of the Class have purchased Fragrance
Products from the Defendants. Because of the Defendants'
anticompetitive conduct, the Plaintiffs and the Class members were
forced to pay more for these products than they otherwise would
have, and thus have suffered substantial overcharge damages at the
hands of the the Defendants, says the suit.

The Defendants' unlawful conduct has successfully eliminated or
suppressed competition in the market, and Plaintiffs and the Class
members have sustained and continue to sustain, significant losses
in the form of artificially inflated prices paid to Defendants, the
suit further asserts.

GIVAUDAN SA manufactures and markets fragrances and flavors from
natural and synthetic ingredients. The Company sells its products
to manufacturers of perfumes, beverages, prepared foods, and
consumer goods. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          James E. Cecchi, Esq.
          CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI
          OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C.
          5 Becker Farm Road
          Roseland, NJ 07068
          Telephone: (973) 994-1700
          Email: jcecchi@carellabyrne.com

GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC: FWK Holdings Suit Moved to Dist. of New Jersey
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, FWK HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC,
formerly known as "SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION," doing business
as "GLAXOSMITHKLINE," TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., and TEVA
PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendants, Civil Action No. 23-757
(E.D. Pa.), Judge Kelly B. Hodge of the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania grants the Defendants' Motion to
Transfer and denies their Motion to Stay as moot.

The Plaintiff filed suit before the Court on Feb. 27, 2023 against
Defendants GlaxoSmithKline LLC ("GSK"), Teva Pharmaceutical
Industries LTD., and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (jointly
"Teva") alleging that they violated antitrust laws through their
settlement agreement to end a patent suit over GSK's brand-name
drug Lamictal and Teva's generic form, lamotrigine. Presently
before the Court is the Defendants' Motion to Transfer requesting
that pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) and the
"first-to-file" doctrine1 this matter be transferred to the U.S.
District Court for the District of New Jersey where a similar case,
In re: Lamictal Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig., No.
2:12-cv-00995 (D.N.J.), has been ongoing since Feb. 17, 2012.
Contemporaneously, the Defendants also filed a Motion to Stay the
case pending the outcome of their Motion to Transfer.

The basis of the litigation stems from the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984
that allows drug manufacturers to bring generics to market for a
180-day exclusivity period by piggybacking off a brand-name drug's
safety and efficacy studies and Food and Drug Administration
("FDA") approval, through what is known as an Abbreviated New Drug
Application ("ANDA"). To do so, the generic manufacturer certifies
in its ANDA that the brand-name drug's patent is invalid, but if
the brand-name manufacturer challenges that designation, FDA
approval for the generic is enjoined for a certain time period. And
that is exactly what occurred: GSK challenged Teva in patent
litigation which delayed Teva's generic version of lamotrigine from
getting FDA approval and coming to market. Yet at that time, GSK,
under the relevant regulatory framework, could have launched or
licensed its own generic form of Lamictal, known as an "Authorized
Generic (AG)."

Though Teva was successful at the patent litigation bench trial as
to one infringement claim, the judge informed the parties that he
would subsequently deliberate as to the remaining claims whereupon
GSK and Teva decided, instead, to settle. As part of the
settlement, GSK agreed not to launch an AG in exchange for Teva
selling generic lamotrigine later than it otherwise would have been
able to. The Plaintiff, a purchaser of the Defendants' drugs, now
claims that the settlement agreement amounts to an antitrust
violation as it caused them to pay more than they otherwise would
have, had market competition not been delayed.

On Feb. 17, 2012, a putative class action was filed in the District
of New Jersey that, like the present matter, alleged antitrust
violations as a result of the same settlement agreement that
resolved patent litigation between the same Defendants in New
Jersey Action. That litigation has resulted in a lengthy and
complicated history with numerous appeals and stays issued by the
court.

In the New Jersey Action, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit determined that a plausible antitrust theory exists under
the Supreme Court's precedent in FTC v. Actavis, 133 S.Ct. 2223
(2013). See King Drug Co. of Florence, Inc., 791 F.3d at 388.
However, class certification and attempts to certify smaller
subclasses were denied after a decade's worth of protracted
litigation where each party vigorously argued their respective
positions on behalf of their clients.

Following this denial of class certification, purchasers not named
as plaintiffs in the New Jersey Action sued in the Eastern District
of Pennsylvania, based on the same claims and allegations but
styled as individual rather than putative class actions. These
cases include the present matter, MLI RX, LLC, et al. v.
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al., 23-cv-429 (E.D. Pa.) filed on Feb. 2,
2023, and Morris & Dickson Co., L.L.C. v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et
al., 23-cv-480 (E.D. Pa.) filed on Feb. 7, 2023.

In all three actions before this Court, the Defendants have moved
to transfer the cases to the District of New Jersey pursuant to the
"first-to-file" doctrine and the federal transfer statute in 28
U.S.C. Section 1404(a) where the New Jersey Action has been ongoing
for a decade. They have also requested a stay pending the Court's
determination. On May 30, 2023, this Court found in MLI RX, LLC
that the first-to-file doctrine and 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a)
supported a transfer to the District of New Jersey.

The parties recycle the arguments made in MLI RX, LLC -- a nearly
identical case involving the same defendants, but different
plaintiffs represented by the same counsel -- as to the grounds for
and against a venue transfer under the first-to-file doctrine and
Section 1404(a). The difference, in this case, is that the
Plaintiff does not contend that Pennsylvania is its home forum.
Instead, the Plaintiff points to one Defendant (GSK) and
non-parties to this action, three of the sixteen plaintiffs
(AmerisourceBergen Co., AmerisourceBergen Drug Co., Value Drug Co)
in MLI RX, LLC who are in Pennsylvania.

Similar to the decision in MLI RX, LLC, Judge Hodge agrees that the
first-to-file doctrine and Section 1404(a) support a transfer of
this case to the District of New Jersey. Considering the
substantial overlap, which even the Plaintiff concedes, she finds
that the New Jersey Action and this case are sufficiently parallel.
She also finds that the Plaintiff fails to set forth sufficient
circumstances warranting departure from the first-to-file
doctrine.

Splitting this litigation between two venues, where the first-filed
action is advanced and this case is in its infancy, would not lead
to judicial acceleration, but rather, inefficient duplication along
with potentially conflicting rulings. Like MLI RX, LLC, the
Plaintiff has presented no evidence that resolution of this dispute
on the merits has been subverted or that a recognized exception is
applicable. The Court's reasoning in MLI RX, LLC applies.
Accordingly, under the first-to-file doctrine a transfer to the
District of New Jersey is appropriate.

Having determined that a venue transfer is appropriate, Judge Hodge
denies the Defendants' Motion to Stay as moot.

Since the parties do not dispute that the action could have been
brought in the District of New Jersey, Judge Hodge applies several
public and private factors to determine which forum is most
appropriate to consider the case. The private factors include the
plaintiff's forum preference; the defendant's forum preference;
whether the claim arose elsewhere; the convenience of the parties
as indicated by their relative physical and financial condition;
the convenience of the witnesses; and the location of books and
records.

The public factors include the practical considerations that could
make the trial easy, expeditious, or inexpensive; the relative
administrative difficulty in the two fora resulting from court
congestion; the local interest in deciding local controversies at
home; the public policies of the fora; and the familiarity of the
trial judge with the applicable state law in diversity cases. Judge
Hodge rules that the relevant public and private factors strongly
weigh in favor of a Section 1404(a) venue transfer.

For these reasons, Judge Hodge grants the Defendants' Motion to
Transfer and denies their Motion to Stay. An appropriate Order will
follow.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 30, 2023 Memorandum is
available at https://tinyurl.com/bdh65dmt from Leagle.com.


GOTHAM PLASTIC SURGERY: Hwang Files ADA Suit in E.D. New York
-------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Gotham Plastic
Surgery, PLLC. The case is styled as Jenny Hwang, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated v. Gotham Plastic
Surgery, PLLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-04205 (E.D.N.Y., June 7, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Gotham Plastic Surgery, PLLC -- https://gothamplasticsurgeryny.com/
-- is a plastic surgery clinic in New York City, New York.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          14749 71st Ave.
          Flushing, NY 11367
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


GRE3N LLC: Andrus et al. Seek to Recover Unpaid Wages
-----------------------------------------------------
CREIG ANDRUS, ORNANDO BUTLER, BRYAN CHAVIS, JAMES GILBERT, JOCKQUE
RANDELL v. GRE3N, LLC, GRE3N WASTE REMOVAL, LLC, GR3N ISIAH
INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Case No. 6:23-cv-00727 (W.D. La., June 1, 2023)
is a class action arising out of the Defendants' violations of the
Fair Labor Standards Act.

One of the Plaintiffs, Creig Andrus, was employed by Defendants as
members of a utility vegetation management (UVM) ground crew from
December 2021 to May 5, 2023, at a regular pay rate of $21 per
hour. Defendants failed to pay Plaintiffs' wages due for all hours
worked during the workweeks ending April 8, April 15, April 22,
April 29, and May 6, 2023, either on the regular payday, or on the
next regular payday after their last day of employment. The
Plaintiffs and the other members of their work crew were laid off
or discharged on or about May 12, 2023. The Plaintiffs made demand
for all unpaid wages due at that time. As of the date hereof, the
Defendants have failed and refused to pay wages due, the Plaintiffs
claim.

The Defendants are engaged in the business of providing tree
removal and UVM services to clear right-of-ways under and around
electrical transmission power lines for customers of the
defendants, such as ENTERGY and DEMCO. [BN]


The Plaintiff is represented by:

           Christopher Zaunbrecher, Esq.
           BRINEY FORET CORRY, LLP
           413 Travis Street, Suite 200
           Post Office Drawer 51367
           Lafayette, LA 70505-1367
           Telephone: (337) 456-9835
           Facsimile: (337) 233-8719
           E-mail: zaunbrecher@brineyforet.com

GSK CONSUMER HEALTH: Cirrito Files Suit in W.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against GSK Consumer Health,
Inc. The case is styled as Susan Cirrito, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. GSK Consumer Health,
Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-00491 (W.D.N.Y., June 5, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud.

GSK Consumer Health, Inc. -- https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/ -- are a
global biopharma company with a purpose to unite science,
technology and talent to get ahead of disease together.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Spencer I Sheehan, Esq.
          SHEEHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          60 Cuttermill Road Ste 412
          Great Neck, NY 11021
          Phone: (516) 268-7080
          Fax: (516) 234-7800
          Email: spencer@spencersheehan.com


HARVARD PILGRIM: Fails to Safeguard Customers' Info, Wilson Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
TRACIE WILSON, on behalf of herself individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC.
and POINT32HEALTH, INC., Case No. 1:23-cv-11288-PBS (D. Mass., June
7, 2023) alleges that the Defendants breached their duties to the
Plaintiff and Class Members under the FTC Act by failing to provide
fair, reasonable, or adequate computer systems and data security
practices to safeguard Sensitive Information.

The suit arises from a cyberattack resulting in a data breach of
sensitive information in the possession and custody and/or control
of the Defendants. The Data Breach resulted in the unauthorized
disclosure, exfiltration, and theft of current and former
customers’ highly personal information, including names, Social
Security numbers, dates of birth, phone numbers, addresses,
provider taxpayer identification numbers ("personal identifying
information" or "PII"), and health insurance account information
and clinical information ("protected health information" or "PHI"),
the Plaintiff contends.

The Data Breach occurred between March 28, 2023, and April 17,
2023. The Defendants did not become aware of suspicious activity on
their network until April 17, 2023, allowing cybercriminals
unfettered access to the Plaintiff and the Class's Sensitive
Information for twenty days, the Plaintiff adds.

The Defendants waited over a month before informing the Plaintiff
and Class Members about the breach, even though the Plaintiff and
approximately 2.5 million Class Members had their most sensitive
personal information accessed, exfiltrated, and stolen, causing
them to suffer ascertainable losses in the form of the loss of the
benefit of their bargain and the value of their time reasonably
incurred to remedy or mitigate the effects of the attack.
Accordingly, the Defendants' failure to timely detect and report
the Data Breach made their customers vulnerable to identity theft
without any warnings to monitor their financial accounts or credit
reports to prevent unauthorized use of their Sensitive Information,
says the suit.

Tracie Wilson is a natural person and citizen of New Hampshire,
where she intends to remain.

Harvard Pilgrim is a nonprofit healthcare company in Massachusetts
that provides health care to their customers.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Samuel J. Strauss, Esq.
          Raina Borrelli, Esq.
          TURKE & STRAUSS LLP
          613 Williamson Street, Suite 201 
          Madison, WI 53703 
          Telephone: (608) 237-1775 
          Facsimile: (608) 509-4423 
          E-mail: sam@turkestrauss.com 
                  raina@turkestrauss.com  

                - and -

          J. Gerard Stranch, IV, Esq.
          Andrew E. Mize, Esq.
          STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC
          The Freedom Center
          223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200
          Nashville, TN 37203
          Telephone: (615) 254-8801
          Facsimile: (615) 255-5419
          E-mail: gstranch@stranchlaw.com
                  amize@stranchlaw.com

                - and -

          Robert J. Bonsignore, Esq.
          Melanie Porter, Esq.
          BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, PLLC
          23 Forest St.
          Medford, MA 02155
          Mobile: (781) 354-1800
          Office: (781) 350-0000
          Facsimile: (702) 983-8673
          E-mail: rbonsignore@classactions.us
                  melanie@classactions.us

                - and -

          Lynn A. Toops, Esq.
          COHEN & MALAD, LLP
          One Indiana Square, Suite 1400
          Indianapolis, IN 46204
          Telephone: (317) 636-6481
          E-mail: ltoops@cohenandmalad.com

HEARST TELEVISION: Gravel Suit Transferred to D. Vermont
--------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Eric Gravel, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated v. Hearst Television, Inc., City of Winooski,
Vermont, including their police departments and elected officials;
Town of Colchester, Vermont, including their police departments and
elected officials; City of Burlington, Vermont, including their
police departments and elected officials, Case No. 1:23-cv-04527
was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York, to the U.S. District Court for the District
of Vermont on June 7, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-00108-gwc-kjd to
the proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Prisoner Civil Rights.

Hearst Television, Inc. -- http://www.hearst.com/-- is a
broadcasting company in the United States owned by Hearst
Communications.[BN]

The Plaintiffs appears pro se.


HOME DEPOT: Class Settlement in Carlson Suit Gets Final Approval
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, CHRIS CARLSON, individually and on behalf of all
persons similarly situated, Plaintiff v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., a
foreign corporation; and THE HOME DEPOT, INC., a foreign
corporation, Defendants, Case No. 2:20-cv-01150 MJP (W.D. Wash.),
Judge Tana Lin of the U.S. District Court for the Western District
of Washington, Seattle, grants the Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for
Final Approval of Class Action Settlement.

Judge Lin has considered all papers submitted by the parties in
connection with the proposed settlement. In addition to the
parties' materials, she held a hearing on May 30, 2023. Having
heard all persons properly appearing and requesting to be heard,
considered the papers submitted in support of the proposed
Settlement and the oral presentations of counsel, considered all
applicable law, and considered any objections made properly to the
proposed Settlement, she grants the Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion
for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement.

Judge Lin approves the Settlement, finding that it is fair,
reasonable, and adequate to members of the Settlement Class and
consistent and in compliance with all requirements of Washington
and federal law for the reasons set forth in the Preliminary
Approval Motion and in the Plaintiff's Motion for Final Approval.

The Court finds that Plaintiff Chris Carlson and Class Counsel
Schroeter Goldmark & Bender adequately represented the Class for
the purposes of entering and implementing the Settlement.

The Court finds that the Class Counsel's request for an award of
attorneys' fees and costs is fair and reasonable and approves the
request for an attorneys' fee award of 20% of the Gross Settlement
Fund, or $1.16 million, plus litigation costs of $75,017.54.

Judge Lin also approves (i) the incentive payments from the Gross
Settlement Fund in the amount of $10,000 to the named Plaintiff and
$250 each to the 16 class members who were deposed by defense
counsel for their time and service on behalf of the Settlement
Class; and (ii) the payment in the amount of $22,000 from the Gross
Settlement Fund to ILYM Group for its fees and costs as Settlement
Administrator.

The parties are directed to proceed with the settlement payment
procedures specified under the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

The Settlement Agreement is binding on all Settlement Class
Members, as defined in the parties' Settlement Agreement. Plaintiff
Chris Carlson and the Class Members are bound by the Release of
Claims set forth in Paragraphs 25 through 27 of the Settlement
Agreement, and are enjoined from maintaining, prosecuting,
commencing, or pursuing any claim released under the Settlement
Agreement, and are deemed to have released and discharged the
Defendants and Released Parties from any such claims.

The Court reserves jurisdiction over the parties as to all matters
relating to the administration, enforcement, and interpretation of
the Settlement Agreement, and for any other necessary purposes.
Neither the Final Order and Judgment nor any aspect of the
settlement is to be offered as evidence of, or construed or deemed
as an admission of, liability, culpability, negligence, or
wrongdoing on the part of Defendants or their employees or agents.

The parties are authorized, without further approval from the
Court, to mutually agree to and adopt any technical or process
amendments or modifications to the Settlement Agreement provided
such changes are: (i) consistent with this Order; (ii) consistent
with the intent of the Settlement Agreement; and (iii) do not limit
any substantive rights of the Settlement Class.

In the event the Settlement does not become effective, the Order
will be rendered null and void and will be vacated and, in such
event, all orders entered in connection therewith will be vacated
and rendered null and void.

The case, including all individual and class claims presented
thereby, is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear his,
her, or its own fees and costs, except as set forth.

Judge Lin enters Judgment approving the terms of the Settlement.
Her Order will constitute a final judgment for purposes of Fed. R.
Civ. P. 58.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 30, 2023 Order is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yep4admp from Leagle.com.

Adam J. Berger -- berger@sgb-law.com -- Elizabeth Hanley --
hanley@sgb-law.com -- SCHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER, Seattle, WA,
Attorneys for the Plaintiff and the Settlement Class.

Laurence A. Shapero -- laurence.shapero@ogletree.com -- OGLETREE,
DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Seattle, WA, Evan R. Moses --
evan.moses@ogletree.com -- (admitted pro hac vice), OGLETREE,
DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys
for the Defendants.


HOME WARRANTY: Caban Sues Over Debt Collection Practices
--------------------------------------------------------
EMILIO CABAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. HOME WARRANTY ADMINISTRATOR OF FLORIDA, INC.
d/b/a CHOICE HOME WARRANTY, Defendants, Case No. CACE-23-014174
(Fla., Cir., Broward Cty., May 31, 2023) seeks to stop the
Defendant's unfair and unconscionable means to collect a debt.

HOME WARRANTY ADMINISTRATOR OF FLORIDA, INC. d/b/a CHOICE HOME
WARRANTY is a service contract that covers the repair or
replacement of frequently occurring breakdowns of home system
components and appliances. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Shannon E. Gilvey, Esq.
         Jibrael S. Hindi, Esq.
         Shannon E. Gilvey, Esq.
         THE LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI
         110 SE 6th Street, Suite 1744
         Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
         Telephone: (954) 907-1136
         Facsimile: (855) 529-9540

HOUSING AUTHORITY: Harris Suit Removed to C.D. California
---------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Darcel Harris, by and through him, T.H., his
monor child; Daphne Haywood, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Housing Authority of the City of Los
Angeles, Case No. 23STCV09791 was removed from the Los Angeles
County Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for the Central
District of California on June 2, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-04339-SPG-JPR to
the proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I. for Personal Injury.

The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles --
http://www.hacla.org/en-- is a state-chartered public agency.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Kristen Lake Cardoso, Esq.
          KOPELOWITZ OSTROW FERGUSON WEISELBERG GILBERT PA
          One West Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 500
          Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
          Phone: (954) 525-4100
          Fax: (954) 525-4300
          Email: cardoso@kolawyers.com

               - and -

          Scott Edelsberg, Esq.
          EDELSBERG LAW PA
          1925 Century Park East No 1700
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Phone: (305) 975-3320
          Email: scott@edelsberglaw.com

The Defendants is represented by:

          Danielle E. Stierna, Esq.
          Brant H. Dveirin, Esq.
          Jon P. Kardassakis, Esq.
          LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD AND SMITH LLP
          633 West 5th Street, Suite 4000
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Phone: (213) 250-1800
          Fax: (213) 250-7900
          Email: danielle.stierna@lewisbrisbois.com
                 brant.dveirin@lewisbrisbois.com
                 jon.kardassakis@lewisbrisbois.com


HUUUGE INC: Ballew, Honderich Allege Deceptive Marketing Practices
------------------------------------------------------------------
JEREMIAH BALLEW and ELENI HONDERICH, on behalf of themselves and
those similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. HUUUGE, INC., a Delaware
corporation, Defendant, Case No. 2:23-cv-04324-GW-AGR (C.D. Cal.,
June 2, 2023) alleges claims against the Defendants for fraud,
negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and violations of
California's Unfair Competition Law, California's False Advertising
Law, the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and the Illinois
Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.

According to the complaint, the Defendant fraudulently concealed
from and intentionally failed to disclose to consumers the truth
about its advertised discounts and purported limited time sales.
Through false and deceptive marketing, advertising, and pricing
scheme, Defendant violated California law prohibiting the
advertisement of goods for sale as discounted from false former
prices and prohibiting misleading statements about the existence
and amount of price reductions.

Huuuge Casino is a mobile application casino-style game developed
and distributed by Defendant. The game is available on iPhone and
Android devices through the Apple App Store and Google Play
platforms, respectively. Huuuge Casino was first released in 2015.
It provides users with a variety of slot machines on their mobile
device in addition to other games of chance.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

         Andrew T. Ryan, Esq.
         THE RYAN LAW GROUP
         317 Rosecrans Ave.
         Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
         Telephone: (310) 321-4800
         Facsimile: (310) 496-1435
         E-mail: Andrew.ryan@theryanlawgroup.com

HW SELLER: Fails to Pay Proper Overtime Wages, Davis Suit Alleges
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Brandi Davis, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. HW Seller LLC d/b/a Healthworks, Defendant,
Case No. 1:23-cv-03443 (N.D. Ill., May 31, 2023) arises out of the
Defendant's violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the
Illinois Minimum Wage Law.

Plaintiff Davis was employed by Defendant as a sales representative
from about June 15, 2022 through approximately February 15, 2023.
The Plaintiff and other similarly-situated employees regularly
worked over 40 hours per week. They were required by Defendant to
perform unpaid work before clocking in each day, including but not
limited to starting and logging into Defendant's computer systems,
numerous software applications, and call system. However, the
Defendant arbitrarily failed to count this work performed by
Plaintiff and other similarly-situated employees as "hours worked,"
says the Plaintiff.

HW Seller, LLC is a corporation for profit doing business as
"Healthworks" with a principal place of business in Illinois. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

             Michael Fradin, Esq.
             LAW OFFICE MICHAEL L. FRADIN
             8401 Crawford Ave. Suite 104
             Skokie, IL 60076
             Telephone: (847) 986-5889
             Facsimile: (847) 673-1228
             E-mail: mike@fradinlaw.com

                     - and -

             James L. Simon, Esq.
             SIMON LAW CO.
             5000 Rockside Road
             Liberty Plaza - Suite 520
             Independence, OH 44131
             Telephone: (216) 816-8696
             Email: james@simonsayspay.com

ICAHN ENTERPRISES: Fails to Disclose Material Facts to Investors
----------------------------------------------------------------
MICHAEL LEVINE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. ICAHN ENTERPRISES L.P., CARL C. ICAHN, DAVID
WILLETTS, TED PAPAPOSTOLOU, KEITH COZZA, and SUNGHWAN CHO,
Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-22009-XXXX (S.D. Fla., May 31, 2023)
arises out of the Defendants' violations of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

This is a class action on behalf of persons and entities that
purchased or otherwise acquired Icahn Enterprises securities
between August 2, 2018 and May 9, 2023. Allegedly, the Defendants
failed to disclose to investors: that Icahn Enterprises was
inflating its net asset value; that the Company was using money
taken in from new investors to pay out dividends to old investors;
that, as a result, the Company would become the subject of criminal
and/or regulatory scrutiny; and that the Defendant's positive
statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects
were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Icahn Enterprises is a master limited partnership holding company
owning subsidiaries engaged in the following operating businesses:
Investment, Energy, Automotive, Food Packaging, Real Estate, Home
Fashion and Pharma. Defendant Carl C. Icahn and his affiliates
owned approximately 85% of Icahn Enterprises' outstanding
depositary units as of December 31, 2022. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

           Jayne A. Goldstein, Esq.
           MILLER SHAH LLP
           1625 N. Commerce Pkwy, Suite 320
           Fort Lauderdale, FL 33326
           Telephone: (954) 903-3170
           Facsimile: (866) 300-7367
           E-mail: jagoldstein@millershah.com

                   - and -

           Stanley M. Grossman, Esq.
           POMERANTZ LLP
           600 Third Avenue
           New York, NY 10016
           Telephone: (212) 661-1100
           Facsimile: (917) 463-1044
           E-mail: smgrossman@pomlaw.com

INCORP INDUSTRIES: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Bermudez Alleges
--------------------------------------------------------------
AURELIO BERMUDEZ, individually and on behalf of all others and
similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff v. INCORP INDUSTRIES LLC,
Defendant, Case No. 8:23-cv-01215 (M.D., Fla., May 31, 2023) seeks
to recover from the Defendants unpaid wages and overtime
compensation, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and
costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiff Bermudez was employed by the Defendant as a carpenter.

INCORP INDUSTRIES LLC is headquartered in the United States. The
Company's line of business includes providing business consulting
services on a contract or fee basis. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Zandro E. Palma, Esq.
         ZANDRO E. PALMA, P.A.
         9100 S. Dadeland Blvd. Suite 1500
         Miami, FL 33156
         Telephone: (305) 446-1500
         Facsimile: (305) 446-1502
         Email: zep@thepalmalawgroup.com

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD: McAhren Files Suit in W.D. Kentucky
--------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. The case is styled as Jon
McAhren, Josh Thompson, Kyle Garner, on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly situated v. International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers, Local 816 International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers, Local 429 International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers, Local 760 International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers, Tennessee Valley Authority, Case No.
5:23-cv-00085-BJB (W.D. Ky., June 5, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Other Civil Rights.

The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) --
http://www.ibew.org/-- is a labor union that represents
approximately 775,000 workers and retirees.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          D. Wes Sullenger, Esq.
          SULLENGER LAW OFFICE, PLLC
          2508 Jackson Street
          Paducah, KY 42003
          Phone: (270) 443-9401
          Email: wes@sullengerfirm.com


JED C. KAMINETSKY: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Vivas Alleges
--------------------------------------------------------------
ANDRES VIVAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. JED C. KAMINETSKY, M.D., P.C., d/b/a
UNIVERSITY UROLOGY, Defendant, Case No. 155016/2023 (N.Y. Sup., New
York Cty., June 5, 2023) is a class action against the Defendant
for its failure to properly secure and safeguard the Plaintiff's
and other similarly situated current and former patients of the
Defendant, personally identifiable information ("PII") and
protected health information ("PHI"), including first and last
name, address, date of birth, username/email in combination with a
password or security question/answer that would permit access,
medical condition, medical treatment, medical test results,
prescription information, health insurance policy number,
subscriber identification number, health plan beneficiary numbers,
and billing/invoice information (the "Private Information") from
criminal threat actors.

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that as a result of the
Defendant's Data Breach, and in light of their Private Information
now being in the hands of cybercriminals, the Plaintiff and Class
Members were, and continue to be, at significant risk of identity
theft and various other forms of personal, social, and financial
harm.

This substantial and imminent risk will remain for their respective
lifetimes, says the suit.

JED C. KAMINETSKY, M.D., P.C., d/b/a UNIVERSITY UROLOGY offers
expert urology services. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Mason A. Barney, Esq.
         Tyler J. Bean, Esq.
         SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP
         745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500
         New York, NY 10151
         Telephone: (212) 532-1091
         Email: mbarney@sirillp.com
                tbean@sirillp.com

KOHN LAW FIRM: Richards Sues Over Unfair Debt Collection Practices
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gretel Richards, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Kohn Law Firm S.C., LVNV Funding LLC, Case No.
1:23-cv-03563 (N.D. Ill., June 6, 2023), is brought against the
Defendants' violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
("FDCPA" or "Act") in response to the "abundant evidence of the use
of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices," by
sending an undated collection letter.

On February 25, 2018, Plaintiff allegedly incurred an obligation to
non-party Synchrony Bank. The Synchrony obligation arose out of a
transaction in which money, property, insurance, or services, of
which the subject transactions, were incurred for personal, family,
or household purposes.

On a date better known by Defendant Kohn, Defendant Kohn sent
Plaintiff a collection letter regarding the debt owed to Synchrony.
The Letter is not dated. There is no way to determine from the
Letter which date "today" and "now" refer to, as the Letter is not
dated. The Plaintiff was thereby misled as to the status of the
subject debt, for it was not associated with a particular date. It
is common practice to date official letters. Letters that lack a
date make them seem illegitimate.

A consumer, such as Plaintiff, cannot pay an alleged debt, trusting
the debt collector, such as Defendant, and the statements made
within the debt collector's correspondence, when it appears that
the information stated in the debt collector's letter is incorrect,
inaccurate, or otherwise misleading, making the consumer question
the legitimacy of debt collector's attempts to collect the alleged
debt, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff is a resident of the State of Illinois, County of
Cook.

Kohn is a "debt collector."[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Yaakov Saks, Esq.
          STEIN SAKS, PLLC
          One University Plaza, Suite 620
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Phone: (201) 282-6500
          Fax: (201) 282-6501
          Email: ysaks@steinsakslegal.com


LABORATORY CORPORATION: Stephens Sues Over NIPT's Deceptive Ads
---------------------------------------------------------------
CHELSEY STEPHENS, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA
HOLDINGS, Defendant, Case No. 1:23-cv-04266-MKB-VMS (E.D.N.Y., June
9, 2023) is a class action against the Defendant for breach of
express warranty, Breach of Implied Warranty, Unjust Enrichment,
fraud, and violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and the New
York General Business Law.

The case arises from the Defendant's alleged false, deceptive, and
misleading advertising, labeling, and marketing of its MaterniT
Genome noninvasive prenatal screening test (NIPT). The Defendant
markets and sells the product by stating that it can reliability
detect chromosomal abnormalities. However, although NIPT is
generally effective at screening for Down syndrome, NIPT tests are
largely unreliable to test for numerous other genetic conditions.
Despite the unreliability of the test, the Defendant falsely
advertises it as having a "high degree of accuracy" and fails to
adequately give notice of its lack of reliability. The Plaintiff
and Class Members would not have purchased the Defendant's test or,
at a minimum, would have paid significantly less for it had they
known it was unreliable to test for numerous conditions. The
Plaintiff and Class Members thus suffered monetary damages as a
result of the Defendant's deceptive and false representations, says
the suit.

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings is a healthcare company,
with its principal place of business in Burlington, North Carolina.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Joshua D. Arisohn, Esq.
         Max S. Roberts, Esq.
         Julian C. Diamond, Esq.
         BURSOR & FISHER, PA
         1330 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
         New York, NY 10019
         Telephone: (646) 837-7150
         Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
         Email: jarisohn@bursor.com
                mroberts@bursor.com
                jdiamond@bursor.com

LEWIS AND CLARK: Lancaster Suit Removed to S.D. Illinois
--------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Dennis Lancaster, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. Lewis and Clark Community College,
Case No. 2023LA000615 was removed from the Circuit Court of the
Third Judicial Circuit, Madison County, Illinois, to the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Illinois on June 2,
2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:23-cv-01914-RJD to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Personal Property.

Lewis and Clark Community College -- https://www.lc.edu/ -- is a
public community college in Godfrey, Illinois.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Christopher W. Byron, Esq.
          BYRON CARLSON PETRI & KALB, LLC
          411 St. Louis Street
          Edwardsville, IL 62025
          Phone: (618) 655-0600
          Fax: (618) 655-4004
          Email: cwb@bcpklaw.com

The Defendants is represented by:

          Amy L. Lenz, Esq.
          BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP-CHICAGO
          One North Wacker Drive, Suite 4500
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Phone: (312) 416-6200
          Fax: (312) 416-6201
          Email: alenz@bakerlaw.com

               - and -

          Sarah A Ballard, Esq.
          BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP - DENVER
          1801 California Street, Suite 4400
          Denver, CO 80202
          Phone: (303) 764-4052
          Fax: (303) 861-7805
          Email: sballard@bakerlaw.com


LISA'S CARE: Wilson Suit Alleges Unpaid Wages for Home Attendants
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NATIA MELADZE WILSON, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. LISA'S CARE LLC, ELISO PAPALADZE
and MARIAMI KIKVIDZE, Defendants, Case No. 7:23-cv-04913 (S.D.N.Y.,
June 12, 2023) is a class action against the Defendants for
violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor
Law including failure to pay overtime wages, failure to pay minimum
wages, failure to pay spread-of-hours compensation, failure to
provide wage notice, and failure to provide accurate wage
statements.

Ms. Wilson was employed by the Defendants as a home attendant while
performing related miscellaneous duties from in or around March 5,
2023 until in or around April 29, 2023.

Lisa's Care LLC is a home healthcare services provider, with its
principal executive office located at 80 Parkway Rd., Bronxville,
New York. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Roman Avshalumov, Esq.
         Helen F. Dalton & Associates, P.C.
         80-02 Kew Gardens Road, Suite 601
         Kew Gardens, NY 11415
         Telephone: (718) 263-9591
         Facsimile: (718) 263-9598

LOUCAS RESTAURANT: Rivas Sues Over Unpaid Minimum, Overtime Wages
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Nelson Rivas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. LOUCAS RESTAURANT CORP. d/b/a LAUREL DINER and PETER
LOUCAS, as an individual, Case No. 2:23-cv-04162 (E.D.N.Y., June 6,
2023), is brought to recover unpaid minimum wage and overtime wage
for the Defendants' egregious violations of state and federal wage
and hour laws arising out of Plaintiff's employment with the
Defendants in violations of Federal and New York State labor laws.

Although Plaintiff regularly worked 57 hours or more hours each
week from in or around from January 2022 until May 2023, the
Defendants did not pay Plaintiff at a wage rate of time and a half
for his hours regularly worked over 40 hours in a work week, a
blatant violation of the overtime provisions contained in the FLSA
and NYLL the Defendants willfully failed to post notices of the
minimum wage and overtime wage requirements in a conspicuous place
at the location of their employment as required by both the NYLL
and the FLSA, says the complaint.

The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant as a food preparer and
cleaner while performing related miscellaneous duties for the
Defendants, from January 2022 until May 2023.

LOUCAS RESTAURANT CORP. d/b/a LAUREL DINER, is a New York domestic
business corporation.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Roman Avshalumov, Esq.
          HELEN F. DALTON & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          80-02 Kew Gardens Road, Suite 601
          Kew Gardens, NY 11415
          Phone: 718-263-9591


MAIMONIDES MEDICAL: Mismanages Hospital Funds, Mann Alleges
-----------------------------------------------------------
JUDI MANN; KEREN SOLOMONS; RON ELSTEIN, and QI MAO CHEN,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs v. KENNETH D. GIBBS; EUGENE KEILIN; PETER REBENWURZEL;
ERMINIA RIVERA; ALEX ROVT; PAUL T. ADDISON; FRANK A. NACCARATO;
DONNA ASTION; RICHARD A. BARASCH; JOSEPH BRUNO; REV. MSGR. DAVID
CASSATO; JEFFREY FENSTER; CHAIM FISCHER; YEHOSHUA FRUCHTHANDLER;
MONICA GHITAN; JEREMY GLICK; JACK HIDARY; LOFTEN HOLDER; MORTIMER
N. KLAUS; GEORGE LIU; ROBERT MACHINIST; DONALD MELTZER; AZZAM
OBEID; MARTIN PAYSON; TREVOR PRICE; AVI SCHRON; MARY SINGH; DAVID
SPIRA; AARON D. TWERSKI; MARTY WAISBROD; GEORGE WEINBERGER; and
MICHAEL L. ZIEGLER, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants, Case No.
516251/2023 (N.Y. Sup., Kings Cty., June 5, 2023) alleges that the
Defendants' mismanagement damaged the Plaintiffs, the communities
it serves, and the hospital, Maimonides Medical Center.

According to the complaint, the Defendants are engaged in funneling
of the Hospital's financial resources away from patient care and
into the pockets of Gibbs, the Hospital's Board of Trustees and
their cronies is having a direct negative impact the quality of
patient care that the Hospital provides to the surrounding
community. The managers and Trustees have focused too long on
enriching themselves and their allies via a "pay-to-play" system
that rewards donors and insiders, depleting the Hospital of the
funds necessary to staff and operate even a reasonably-adequate
medical facility. As a result, the Plaintiffs, and the thousands of
patients with similar claims who are expected to join in this
action, have suffered from the substandard care provided at
Maimonides, says the suit.

MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER provides hospital services. The Hospital
offers anesthesiology, blood donation, heart and vascular,
emergency medicine, neurosciences, radiology, surgery, cancer, and
wound care services. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Y. David Scharf, Esq.
          Christopher Milito, Esq.
          Jamie L. Fitzgerald, Esq.
          MORRISON COHEN LLP
          909 Third Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212) 735-8600

MANAGED CARE: Fails to Prevent Data Breach, Crowe Alleges
---------------------------------------------------------
DONNA CROWE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. MANAGED CARE OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., d/b/a
MCNA DENTAL Defendant, Case No. 0:23-cv-61065-AHS (S.D. Fla., June
5, 2023) is a class action against the Defendant for its failure to
secure and safeguard the Plaintiff and the Class' personally
identifying information ("PII") and personal health information
("PHI"), including names, dates of birth, addresses, telephone
numbers, emails, Social Security numbers, driver's license or
government-issued identification numbers, health insurance
information, Medicaid/Medicare ID numbers, and information
regarding dental and orthodontic care.

According to the Plaintiff in the complaint, as a result of the
Defendant's inadequate security and breach of its duties and
obligations, the Data Breach occurred, and the Plaintiff's and
Class members' PII/PHI was accessed and stolen. The Defendant owed
a duty to the Plaintiff and Class members to implement and maintain
reasonable and adequate security measures to secure, protect, and
safeguard their PII/PHI against unauthorized access and disclosure.
The Defendant breached that duty by, among other things, failing to
implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices
to protect its customers’ PII/PHI from unauthorized access and
disclosure, says the suit.

The Plaintiff seeks to remedy the Defendant's failings and their
consequences. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and
all persons whose PII/PHI was exposed as a result of the Data
Breach.

MANAGED CARE OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., doing business as MCNA Dental,
provides dental plans. The Company offers medicare, long term, and
commercial plans. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dorothy P. Antullis, Esq.
          Alexander C. Cohen, Esq.
          ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
          225 NE Mizner Boulevard, Suite 720
          Boca Raton, FL 33432
          Telephone: (561) 750-3000
          Facsimile: (561) 750-3364
          Email: dantullis@rgrdlaw.com
                 acohen@rgrdlaw.com

               - and -

          Ben Barnow, Esq.
          Anthony L. Parkhill, Esq.
          Riley W. Prince, Esq.
          BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          205 West Randolph Street, Suite. 1630
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Telephone: (312) 621-2000
          Facsimile: (312) 641-5504
          Email: b.barnow@barnowlaw.com
                 aparkhill@barnowlaw.com
                 rprince@barnowlaw.com

MASSACHUSETTS: Dalton Sues Over Denied COVID-19 Recovery Grant
---------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Dalton and New England Firearms Academy, Inc., on behalf of
themselves and a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs v.
Yvonne Hao, in her official capacity as Secretary of Economic
Development; Massachusetts Growth Capital Corporation; and Lawrence
D. Andrews, in his official capacity as President and CEO of
Massachusetts Growth Capital Corporation, Defendants, Case No.
1:23-cv-11216 (D. Mass., May 31, 2023) alleges that the Defendants
violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to
the United States Constitution.

Plaintiff Brian Dalton is one of the many small business owners in
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts working hard to get past the
devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing
government orders that shuttered the state. The Commonwealth is
denying Mr. Dalton his fair opportunity at recovery because of his
race, sex, and sexual orientation. It introduced the Inclusive
Recovery Grant Program to assist small businesses in their ongoing
recovery with grants of up to $75,000. The program allows only
certain business owners to apply, including those who are racial
minorities, women, or LGBTQ+. Mr. Dalton does not fall into any of
these categories and cannot apply for the grant. Mr. Dalton brings
this lawsuit to allow his small businesses to compete on equal
footing for much-needed COVID-19 relief grants and to vindicate his
fundamental right to equality before the law.

Massachusetts Growth Capital Corporation (MGCC) is a body politic
and corporation established pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 40W.
The laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts constitute it as a
public instrumentality. The exercise of MGCC's powers is deemed by
law to be an essential governmental function. MGCC administers the
Inclusive Recovery Grant Program. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

              Jonathan M. Houghton, Esq.
              PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION
              3100 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 1000
              Arlington, VA 22201
              Telephone: (202) 888-6881
              E-mail: JHoughton@pacificlegal.org

                      - and -

              Andrew R. Quinio, Esq.
              Joshua P. Thompson, Esq.
              PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION
              555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1290
              Sacramento, CA 95814
              Telephone: (916) 419-7111
              E-mail: AQuinio@pacificlegal.org
                      JThompson@pacificlegal.org

MEDLINE INDUSTRIES: Polousy Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
---------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Medline Industries,
LP, et al. The case is styled as Jeyson Polousy, individually and
on behalf of all other similarly situated v. Menzies Aviation
(USA), Inc., Randstad North America, Inc., Case No.
STK-CV-UOE-2023-0005667 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Joaquin Cty., June 2,
2023).

The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment."

Medline Industries, LP -- http://www.medline.com/-- is a private
American healthcare company headquartered in Northfield,
Illinois.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gregory Mauro, Esq.
          THE MAURO LAW FIRM APLC
          790 E Colorado Blvd., Fl. 9
          Pasadena, CA 91101-2193
          Phone: 626-698-0048
          Fax: 626-698-0049
          Email: greg@maurolawfirm.net


MERCER UNIVERSITY: Faces Class Suit Over Alleged Data Breach
------------------------------------------------------------
JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY, d/b/a
MERCER UNIVERSITY, Defendant, Case No. 3:23-cv-00087-TCB (N.D. Ga.,
May 31, 2023) alleges claims for negligence, breach of implied
contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair
dealing, and unjust enrichment in connection with the Defendant's
failure to properly secure and safeguard Plaintiff's and Class
members’ personally identifiable information (PII) stored within
Defendant's information network.

The Plaintiff received a letter from Defendant, dated May 19, 2023,
stating that their PII and/or financial information was involved in
the Data Breach. Plaintiff suffered actual injury in the form of
damages to and diminution in the value of their PII--a condition of
intangible property that they entrusted to Defendant, which was
compromised in and as a result of the Data Breach. The Plaintiff
additionally suffered injury in the form of fraudulent credit card
charges he incurred after his receipt of the letter, dating from
May 19, 2023 to May 21, 2023, says the suit.

Mercer University is a private research university organized as a
nonprofit corporation registered in Georgia, with its flagship
campus and headquarters at 1501 Mercer University Drive, Macon, GA.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

           Robert E. Jones, Esq.
           THE JONES LAW FIRM, P.C.
           1100 Peachtree Street Suite 950
           Atlanta, GA 30309
           Telephone: (404) 877-2345
           E-mail: rob@robjoneslaw.com

                   - and -

           Michael R. Reese, Esq.
           REESE LLP
           100 West 93rd Street, 16th Floor
           New York, NY 10025
           Telephone: (212) 643-0500
           Facsimile: (212) 253-4272
           E-mail: mreese@reesellp.com

                   - and -

           Charles D. Moore, Esq.
           REESE LLP
           100 South 5th Street, Suite 1900
           Minneapolis, MN 55402
           Telephone: (212) 643-0500
           E-mail: cmoore@reesellp.com

                   - and -

           Kevin Laukaitis, Esq.
           LAUKAITIS LAW LLC
           954 Avenida Ponce De Leon Suite 205, #10518
           San Juan, PR 00907
           Telephone: (215) 789-4462
           E-mail: klaukaitis@laukaitislaw.com

MOLEKULE INC: Bassaw Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Molekule, Inc. The
case is styled as Shivan Bassaw, individually, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Molekule, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-04667
(S.D.N.Y., June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Molekule -- https://molekule.com/ -- provides FDA-cleared air
purification devices addressing the rapidly growing global air
purification market.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ian Piasecki, Esq.
          MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
          225 Broadway, Ste. 39th Floor
          New York, NY 10007
          Phone: (212) 595-6200
          Email: ipiasecki@mizrahikroub.com


MOONGLOW INC: Alexandria Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Moonglow, Inc. The
case is styled as Erika Alexandria, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated v. Moonglow, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-04805
(S.D.N.Y., June 7, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Moonglow, Inc. -- https://moonglowinc.com/ -- founded by Veronica
Romeo, a Toronto-based musician and creative designer, her pieces
are all on the affordable side, but look like they cost a pretty
penny.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          10826 64th Avenue, Ste. 2nd Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


MULTIPLAN CORP: Annual Meeting Violates DGCL, Sarker Suit Says
--------------------------------------------------------------
AMIT SARKER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. DALE WHITE; ANTHONY COLALUCA, JR.; MICHAEL
S. KLEIN; ALLEN R. THORPE; MICHAEL K. ATTAL; GLENN R. AUGUST;
RICHARD A. CLARKE; C. MARTIN HARRIS; JULIE D. KLAPSTEIN; P. HUNTER
PHILBRICK; MARK H. TABAK; WILLIAM L. VEGHTE; PAUL D. EMERY; and
MULTIPLAN CORPORATION, Defendants, Case No. 2023-0576 (Del. Ch.,
May 31, 2023) is a class action alleging that the 2022 Annual
Meeting and 2023 Annual Meeting of MultiPlan stockholders were held
in violation of the Delaware General Corporation Law and that all
actions taken at these meetings are invalid.

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that because these meetings
took place in contravention of the plain and unambiguous terms of
the DGCL, the actions taken at the meetings are invalid. These
actions include the election of two of three classes of MultiPlan's
directors, such that a majority of the Board has now been invalidly
elected, as well as the purported adoption of the MultiPlan
Corporation 2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP"), under which
the Company is poised to issue and eligible employees to sell
shares notwithstanding the invalidity of the ESPP's adoption, says
the Plaintiff.

MULTIPLAN, INC. provides healthcare cost management solutions. The
Company specializes in providing claim cost management solutions
for controlling the financial risks associated with medical bills.
MultiPlan also offers primary preferred provider organization (PPO)
network solutions for accessing hospitals, ancillary care
facilities, and healthcare professionals in the United States.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          David M. Sborz, Esq.
          Peter B. Andrews, Esq.
          Craig J. Springer, Esq.
          Andrew J. Peach, Esq.
          Jackson E. Warren, Esq.
          ANDREWS & SPRINGER LLC
          4001 Kennett Pike, Suite 250
          Wilmington, DE 19807
          Telephone: (302) 504-4957

N2G2 LLC: Toro Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against N2G2, LLC. The case
is styled as Andrew Toro, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated v. N2G2, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-04797 (S.D.N.Y.,
June 7, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

N2G2, LLC doing business as Lavoo Tobacco is a brand that is pretty
well known for its high quality glass hookahs.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          10826 64th Avenue, Ste. 2nd Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


NATIONAL EXPRESS TRANSIT: Armenta Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
---------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against National Express
Transit Corporation. The case is styled as Ruben Armenta, on behalf
of himself and all others similarly situated v. National Express
Transit Corporation, Case No. STK-CV-UOE-2023-0005774 (Cal. Super.
Ct., San Joaquin Cty., June 6, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil Other Employment."

National Express -- http://www.nationalexpresstransit.com/-- is a
full-service, nationwide operations and management firm.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Tuvia Korobkin, Esq.
          ABRAMSON LABOR GROUP
          11846 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 100
          Studio City, CA 91604-2620
          Phone: 213-493-6300
          Fax: 213-723-2522
          Email: tuvia@abramsonlabor.com


NATURAL LIFESTYLE: Sends Unsolicited Telemarketing Texts, Trim Says
-------------------------------------------------------------------
LUCINE TRIM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. NATURAL LIFESTYLE BRANDS, LLC and DOES 1-10,
inclusive, Defendant, Case No. 2:23-cv-04579 (C.D. Cal., June 9,
2023) is a class action against the Defendant for violation of the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

According to the complaint, the Defendant is engaged in the
practice of sending text messages to consumers' cellular phone
numbers using an automatic telephone dialing system (ATSD) in an
attempt to promote its products and services without obtaining
prior express consent.

Natural Lifestyle Brands, LLC is a manufacturer of health-related
products based in California. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
         Meghan E. George, Esq.
         Adrian R. Bacon, Esq.
         LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
         21031 Ventura Blvd., Suite 340
         Woodland Hills, CA 91364
         Telephone: (323) 306-4234
         Facsimile: (866) 633-0228
         E-mail: tfriedman@toddflaw.com
                 mgeorge@toddflaw.com
                 abacon@toddflaw.com

NEXTGEN HEALTHCARE: Ramos Files Suit in N.D. Georgia
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against NextGen Healthcare,
Inc., et al. The case is styled as Roselee Ramos, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated v. NextGen Healthcare,
Inc., NextGen Healthcare Information Systems, LLC doing business
as: NextGen Healthcare, Case No. 1:23-cv-02504-TWT (N.D. Ga., June
2, 2023).

The nature suit is stated as Other Contract for Breach of Fiduciary
Duty.

NextGen Healthcare, Inc. -- http://www.nextgen.com/-- is an
American software and services company headquartered in Atlanta,
Georgia.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          John A. Yanchunis, Esq.
          Ra O. Amen, Esq.
          MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX LITIGATION GROUP - TAMPA, FL
          201 N Franklin St., 7th Fl.
          Tampa, FL 33602
          Phone: (813) 223-0931
          Email: jyanchunis@forthepeople.com

              - and -

          Marico W. Valladares, Esq.
          MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX LITIGATION GROUP -FL
          201 North Franklin Street, 7th Floor
          Tampa, FL 33602-3644
          Phone: (916) 777-7777
          Fax: (916) 924-1829


NVR MORTGAGE: Cossaboom FLSA Suit Transferred to E.D. Virginia
--------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Melissa Cossaboom f/k/a Melissa Collins and Ann
Adair Hatch, Joel Hughes, Daniel Tapscott, Jessica Pettry,
Christopher Gates, Faran Gaies, Brian Gardner, Lori Jenkins,
Elizabeth Galan, Ellen Desmond, Paola Leon, Eva Christenson, John
Carlisle, Scotty McCauley, Craig Smolen, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated v. NVR MORTGAGE FINANCE, INC.,
NVR, INC., Case No. 9:21-cv-80627 was transferred from the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Florida, to the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on June 6,
2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:23-cv-00716-RDA-JFA to
the proceeding.

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Acts for the Denial of Overtime Compensation.

NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. -- https://www.nvrmortgage.com/ -- offer
a large variety of mortgage programs to help meet your financial
needs and goals.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Gregg I. Shavitz, Esq.
          Paolo C. Meireles, Esq.
          Logan A. Pardell, Esq.
          SHAVITZ LAW GROUP, P.A.
          Yamato Road, Suite 285
          Boca Raton, FL 33431
          Phone: (561) 447-8888
          Facsimile: (561) 447-8831
          Email: gshavitz@shavitzlaw.com
                 pmeireles@shavitzlaw.com
                 lpardell@shavitzlaw.com

               - and -

          Michele R. Fisher, Esq.
          Kayla M. Kienzle, Esq.
          NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP
          80 South 8th Street, Suite 4700
          Minneapolis, MN 55402
          Phone: (612) 256-3200
          Facsimile: (612) 338-4878
          Email: fisher@nka.com
                 kkienzle@nka.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Kevin M. Young
          SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
          1075 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2500
          Atlanta, GA 30328
          Phone: (404) 885-6697
          Fax: (404) 724-1697
          Email: kyoung@seyfarth.com

               - and -

          Barry James Miller
          Christopher W. Kelleher
          Hillary Massey
          SEYFARTH SHAW LLP (MA-NA)
          Two Seaport Blvd., Suite 1200
          Boston, MA 02210
          Phone: (617) 946-4800
          Fax: (617) 946-4801



ONYX COALE: Charman Files TCPA Suit in S.D. California
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Onyx Coale, et al.
The case is styled as Thane Charman, individual and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. Onyx Coale, an individual; John
Doe, an unknown business entity; Case No. 3:23-cv-01043-AGS-BLM
(S.D. Cal., June 5, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Yuri Simpson, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF YURI SIMPSON
          PO Box 16232
          San Diego, CA 92176
          Phone: (619) 762-1118
          Email: yuri@lifelinelegal.com


OSANA CLEANING: Faces Velasquez Wage-and-Hour Suit in E.D.N.Y.
--------------------------------------------------------------
ISMENIA M. VELASQUEZ, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. OSANA CLEANING CORP., GLOBAL
COMMERCIAL CLEANING SERVICES, INC., JEAN PIERRE ESPEJO, and VANESSA
ESPEJO, Defendants, Case No. 2:23-cv-04257 (E.D.N.Y., June 9, 2023)
is a class action against the Defendants for violations of the Fair
Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law including failure to
pay overtime wages, failure to pay spread-of-hours wages, failure
to provide wage notice, failure to provide accurate wage
statements, and failure to timely pay wages.

The Plaintiff worked for the Defendants as a cleaner from
approximately 2014 through October 7, 2022.

Osana Cleaning Corp. is an office and commercial cleaning company
headquartered in Glen Head, New York.

Global Commercial Cleaning Services, Inc. is an office and
commercial cleaning company headquartered in Glen Head, New York.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Mitchell Schley, Esq.
         LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL SCHLEY, LLC
         197 Route 18, Suite 3000
         East Brunswick, NJ 08816
         Telephone: (732) 325-0318
         E-mail: mschley@schleylaw.com

PADSPLIT INC: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Cunningham Alleges
------------------------------------------------------------
CAMILLIA CUNNINGHAM, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PADSPLIT, INC., Defendant, Case
No. 8:23-cv-01252 (M.D. Fla., June 5, 2023) seeks to stop the
Defendants' practice of making unsolicited calls.

PADSPLIT, INC. operates as a real estate company. The Company rents
residential properties, as well as provides water, internet, washer
and dryer usage, and parking facilities. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Manuel S. Hiraldo, Esq.
          HIRALDO P.A.
          401 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1400
          Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
          Telephone: (954) 400-4713
          Email: mhiraldo@hiraldolaw.com

               - and -

          Rachel Dapeer, Esq.
          DAPEER LAW, P.A.
          20900 NE 30th Ave., Suite 417
          Aventura, FL 33180
          Telephone: (305) 610-5223
          Email: rachel@dapeer.com

PAL MFG: Ventura Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages for Glass Cutters
----------------------------------------------------------
JOSE VENTURA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. PAL MFG. CORP. OF NEW YORK and A & A WINDOWS
BY PAL CORP., and LAUREL ANN MARNERIS, Defendants, Case No.
2:23-cv-04265 (E.D.N.Y., June 9, 2023) is a class action against
the Defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and
the New York Labor Law including failure to pay overtime wages,
failure to provide wage notice, and failure to provide accurate
wage statements.

Mr. Ventura was employed by the Defendants as a glass cutter while
performing related miscellaneous duties, from in or around 1992
until in or around January 5, 2023.

Pal Mfg. Corp. of New York is a manufacturer of vinyl windows, with
principal executive offices located at 230 Duffy Ave., Hicksville,
New York.

A & A Windows by Pal Corp. is a windows manufacturer, with
principal executive offices located at 51 Frost St., Westbury, New
York. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Roman Avshalumov, Esq.
         Helen F. Dalton & Associates, P.C.
         80-02 Kew Gardens Road, Suite 601
         Kew Gardens, NY 11415
         Telephone: (718) 263-9591
         Facsimile: (718) 263-9598

PANAMA JACK: Alexandria Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Panama Jack
International, Inc. The case is styled as Erika Alexandria, on
behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Panama Jack
International, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-04805 (S.D.N.Y., June 7,
2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Panama Jack -- https://panamajack.com/ -- is dedicated to helping
its customers discover new products and horizons.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          10826 64th Avenue, Ste. 2nd Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Phone: (917) 915-7415
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com


PERSIAN GALLERY: Blind Can't Access Online Store, Vachnine Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NESS-LEE VACHNINE, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. PERSIAN GALLERY COMPANY, INC.
d/b/a PERSIAN GALLERY NEW YORK, Defendant, Case No. 1:23-cv-04858
(S.D.N.Y., June 9, 2023) is a class action against the Defendant
for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York
State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law.

According to the complaint, the Defendant has failed to design,
construct, maintain, and operate its website to be fully accessible
to and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or
visually impaired persons. The Defendant's website,
https://www.pgny.com/, contains access barriers which hinder the
Plaintiff and Class members to enjoy the benefits of its online
goods, content, and services offered to the public through the
website. The accessibility issues include, but not limited to: (a)
lack of alternative text (alt-text), or a text equivalent; (b)
empty links that contain no text causing the function or purpose of
the link to not be presented to the user; (c) redundant links; and
(d) linked images missing alt-text, says the suit.

The Plaintiff and Class members seek permanent injunction to cause
a change in the Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and
procedures so that the Defendant's website will become and remain
accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.

Persian Gallery Company, Inc., doing business as Persian Gallery
New York, is an owner and operator of an online carpet and rug
store, doing business in New York. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         Gabriel A. Levy, Esq.
         GABRIEL A. LEVY, P.C.
         1129 Northern Blvd., Ste. 404
         Manhasset, NY 11030
         Telephone: (347) 941-4715
         E-mail: Glevy@glpcfirm.com

PETER LUGER: Web Site Not Accessible to Blind, Black Suit Says
--------------------------------------------------------------
JAHRON BLACK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. PETER LUGER, INC., Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-04076 (E.D.N.Y., June 1, 2023) alleges Defendant's
violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant's Web
site, https://www.peterluger.com, is not fully or equally
accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, including the
Plaintiff, in violation of the ADA.

The Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to cause a change in the
Defendant's corporate policies, practices, and procedures so that
the Defendant's Web site will become and remain accessible to blind
and visually-impaired consumers.

PETER LUGER INC. operates as a steak house. The Company provides
multiple restaurant locations in the New York City area and also
allows customers to receive overnight shipping of its products
through its online catalog. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mars Khaimov, Esq.
          MARS KHAIMOV LAW, PLLC
          108-26 64th avenue, Second Floor
          Forest Hills, NY 11375
          Telephone: (929) 324-0717
          Facsimile: (929) 333-7774
          Email: mars@khaimovlaw.com

PINK JEEP: Fails to Pay Guides' Minimum & OT Wages, Slepian Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Geoffrey H. Slepian, on behalf of himself and all those similarly
situated v. Pink Jeep Tours, LLC, an Arizona limited liability
company, Pink Adventure Holdings, LLC, an Arizona limited liability
company, Herschend Adventure Holdings, LLC, a Georgia limited
liability company, Case No. 3:23-cv-08105-SPL (D. Ariz., June 7,
2023) alleges on behalf of the Plaintiff and all other similarly
situated non-exempt employees employed as guides by the Defendant
that they are entitled to unpaid wages, including unpaid overtime
for all hours worked exceeding 40 hours in a workweek and unpaid
minimum wage, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees and costs,
pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Arizona Wage
Statute.

While Plaintiff's job duties frequently required him to work in
excess of 40 hours per workweek, he was routinely denied the
overtime rate of time and a half for all the overtime he worked.
Pink Jeep had a policy and practice of requiring Guides like
Plaintiff to work off the clock, the Plaintiff alleges.

Accordingly, the Defendant's failure to pay overtime and minimum
wage compensation at the rates required by the FLSA result from
generally applicable policies or practices and do not depend on the
personal circumstances of the members of the collective action.
Thus, the Plaintiff's experience is typical of the experience of
the other non-exempt hourly employees employed by the Defendant as
Guides, says the suit.

The Plaintiff seeks to certify:

          All hourly employees of Pink Jeep who worked as Guides
in
          Arizona during the last three years, regardless of actual

          title ("Off-the-Clock Collective Action Members").

The Plaintiff was hired by Pink Jeep as a non-exempt Guide paid on
an hourly basis in August 2018 until March 2020. The Plaintiff was
then re-hired by Pink Jeep as a non-exempt Guide paid on an hourly
basis from June 2021 until May 2023, at which time the Plaintiff,
in agreement with Pink Jeep, was granted permission to take the
summer season off and then return to his position as a Guide.

Pink Jeep provides off-road excursions throughout the United States
and was founded in Sedona, Arizona in 1960.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ty D. Frankel, Esq.
          Patricia N. Syverson, Esq.
          YEN PILCH ROBAINA & KRESIN PLC
          6017 N. 15th Street
          Phoenix, AZ 85014
          Telephone: (602) 682-6450
          E-mail: TDF@yprklaw.com
                  PNS@yprklaw.com

PROFUSION COSMETICS: Slade Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Profusion Cosmetics
Corp. The case is styled as Linda Slade, individually and as the
representative of a class of similarly situated persons v.
Profusion Cosmetics Corp., Case No. 1:23-cv-04679 (S.D.N.Y., June
2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Profusion Cosmetics -- https://profusioncosmetics.com/ -- was
established in sunny Southern California nearly 20 years ago with a
select few makeup products and ever-growing ambitions.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dan Shaked, Esq.
          SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.
          14 Harwood Court, Suite 415
          Scarsdale, NY 10583
          Phone: (917) 373-9128
          Email: shakedlawgroup@gmail.com


PURE FISHING: Tucker Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Pure Fishing, Inc.
The case is styled as Henry Tucker, on behalf of himself and all
other persons similarly situated v. Pure Fishing, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-04659 (S.D.N.Y., June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Pure Fishing, Inc. -- https://www.purefishing.com/ -- designs and
manufactures fishing tackle equipment and related products. The
Company provides fishing tackles, lures, rods, reels, combos, and
down riggers under various brands to anglers.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Bradly G. Marks, Esq.
          THE MARKS LAW FIRM, PC
          155 East 55th St., Ste. 6a
          New York, NY 10022
          Phone: (646) 770-3775
          Fax: (646) 867-2639
          Email: brad@markslawpc.com


R&B CORPORATION: Brooks Files Suit in E.D. Virginia
---------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against R&B Corporation of
Virginia. The case is styled as Mary Brooks, Michele Van Moppes,
individually and on behalf all others similarly situated v. R&B
Corporation of Virginia doing business as: Credit Control
Corporation, Case No. 4:23-cv-00071-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va., June 2,
2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract.

R&B Corporation of Virginia doing business as Credit Control --
https://creditcontrol.net/ -- is a debt collection agency.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          David Hilton Wise, Esq.
          Joseph Michael Langone, Esq.
          Wise Law Firm, PLC
          10640 Page Avenue, Suite 320
          Fairfax, VA 22030
          Phone: (703) 934-6377
          Fax: (703) 934-6379
          Email: dwise@wiselaw.pro
                 jlangone@wiselaw.pro


RADIUS CORPORATION: Kunkle Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Radius Corporation.
The case is styled as Frank Kunkle, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Radius Corporation, Case No.
1:23-cv-04658 (S.D.N.Y., June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Radius -- https://madebyradius.com/ -- is an eco-friendly
toothbrush and natural toothpaste company inspired by nature and
designed with purpose for a better you & a better world.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noor Abou-Saab, I, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF NOOR A. SAAB
          380 North Broadway, Suite 300
          Jericho, NY 11753
          Phone: (718) 740-5060
          Email: noorasaablaw@gmail.com


RE/MAX HOLDINGS: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Abante Rooter Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ABANTE ROOTER AND PLUMBING, INC., individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. RE/MAX HOLDINGS, INC., Case
No. 1:23-cv-01375 (D. Colo., June 1, 2023) seeks to stop the
Defendants' practice of making unsolicited calls.

RE/MAX HOLDINGS, INC. provides real estate brokerage services. The
Company sells residential and commercial properties worldwide.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Steven L. Woodrow, Esq.
          Patrick H. Peluso, Esq.
          Taylor T. Smith, Esq.
          Stephen A. Klein, Esq.
          WOODROW & PELUSO, LLC
          3900 East Mexico Ave., Suite 300
          Denver, CO 80210
          Telephone: (720) 213-0675
          Facsimile: (303) 927-0809
          Email: swoodrow@woodrowpeluso.com
                 ppeluso@woodrowpeluso.com
                 tsmith@woodrowpeluso.com
                 sklein@woodrowpeluso.com

RED LION: Kunkle Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Red Lion
Manufacturing, Inc. The case is styled as Frank Kunkle, on behalf
of himself and all others similarly situated v. Red Lion
Manufacturing, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-04660 (S.D.N.Y., June 2,
2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Red Lion Manufacturing, Inc. --
https://www.redlion.net/solutions/manufacturing -- was founded in
2008. The Company's line of business includes the manufacturing of
waterproof outerwear.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noor Abou-Saab, I, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF NOOR A. SAAB
          380 North Broadway, Suite 300
          Jericho, NY 11753
          Phone: (718) 740-5060
          Email: noorasaablaw@gmail.com


REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE: Howard Files TCPA Suit in D. Ariz.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Republican National
Committee, et al. The case is styled as Jacob Howard, for himself
and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Republican
National Committee, a Political Action Committee; Unknown Parties,
named as John & Jane Does 1-10; and Does 1-10, Case No.
2:23-cv-00993-SPL (D. Ariz., June 4, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act for Restrictions of Use of Telephone
Equipment.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) -- https://www.gop.com/ --
is a U.S. political committee that is a major part of the
Republican Party of the United States.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jon Laurence Phelps, Esq.
          PHELPS & MOORE PLLC - SCOTTSDALE
          6424 E Greenway Pkwy., Ste. 100
          Scottsdale, AZ 85254
          Phone: (480) 534-1400
          Fax: (480) 477-3900
          Email: jon@phelpsandmoore.com


RETAIL SERVICES: Schlosser Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Retail Services Wis
Corp., et al. The case is styled as Kim Marie Schlosser, on behalf
of all others similarly situated v. Retail Services Wis Corp, Does
1-50, Case No. 23CV002756 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., June
5, 2023).

The case type is stated as " Other Employment Complaint Case."

Retail Services WIS Corporation provides storage and warehousing
services.[BN]

RHM RESTAURANT: Underpays Bartenders & Servers, Volkava Suit Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MARYIA VOLKAVA, NASTASSIA PLASKAVITSKAYA, SVETLANA ZAYTSEVA, and
TAMARA HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. RHM RESTAURANT CORP. d/b/a ROLFS
and ROBERT H. MAISANO, Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-04893
(S.D.N.Y., June 12, 2023) is a class action against the Defendants
for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York
Labor Law.

The case arises from the Defendants' alleged failure to pay minimum
wages, failure to pay overtime wages, failure to pay
spread-of-hours wages, failure to provide wage notice and
acknowledgement of payrate and payday, and failure to provide
accurate wage statements in violation of FLSA and NYLL. Plaintiff
Hernandez also asserts individual claims of gender discrimination,
sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation against
Defendants under the New York State Human Rights Law and New York
City Human Rights Law.

The Plaintiffs worked at Rolfs as servers and bartenders at any
time between 2013 and 2020.

RHM Restaurant Corp. is an operator of a German restaurant under
the name Rolfs, located at 281 Third Avenue, New York, New York.
[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:                
      
         Milana Dostanitch, Esq.
         LIPSKY LOWE LLP
         420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1830
         New York, NY 10017
         Telephone: (212) 392-4772
         E-mail: milana@lipskylowe.com

RUG COMPANY: Vachnine Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against The Rug Company,
Ltd., et al. The case is styled as Ness-Lee Vachnine, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated v. The Rug Company, Ltd.,
Case No. 1:23-cv-04695 (S.D.N.Y., June 5, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

The Rug Company -- https://www.therugcompany.com/ -- is recognised
internationally as the leading name for contemporary handmade
rugs.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gabriel Levy, Esq.
          GABRIEL A. LEVY, P.C.
          1129 Northern Blvd, Suite 404
          Manhasset, NY 11030
          Phone: (516) 287-3458
          Email: glevy@glpcfirm.com


SACRAMENTO NATURAL: Neal Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sacramento Natural
Foods Cooperative, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Chevonne
Neal, Jesse Leon, on behalf of other members of the general public
similarly situated v. Sacramento Natural Foods Cooperative, Inc.,
Does 1-100, Case No. 23CV002829 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty.,
June 6, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Unlimited Civil."

Sacramento Natural Foods Co-op -- https://www.sac.coop/ -- is a
place where quality food, inspiration and community meet.[BN]

SAKS & CO: Faces Castillo Suit Over Unpaid Overtime Wages
---------------------------------------------------------
SCARLET CASTILLO and NELSON CASTILLO, on behalf of themselves and
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. SAKS & COMPANY LLC,
SAKS.COM LLC, and ARROW WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendants, Case
No. 230600046 (Pa. Com Pl., Philadelphia Cty., June 1, 2023) arises
out of the Defendants' violations of the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage
Act.

The Defendants employed Plaintiff Scarlet Castillo at its Wilkes
Barre, Pennsylvania distribution center and paid her an hourly
wage. Plaintiff Scarlet Castillo typically worked from 2:30 to
11:00 p.m., 5-6 days a week. At the beginning of the workday,
Defendants required Plaintiffs and other class members to go
through a security screening. The time spent going through the
security check included time that Plaintiffs and other class
members had to wait while other employees were also lined up to go
through security screening. The Defendants did not pay Plaintiffs
and other class members for time associated with the mandatory
pre-shift security screenings, says the suit.

Saks & Company LLC is a Delaware limited liability company
headquartered in New York, New York and is registered to do
business in Pennsylvania. The company is a "luxury fashion"
retailer that "combines an emphasis on the digital customer
experience with a strong connection to a network of 41
extraordinary stores across North America for seamless, all-channel
shopping." [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

            Peter Winebrake, Esq.
            Deirdre A. Aaronm Esq.
            WINEBRAKE & SANTILLO, LLC
            715 Twining Road, Suite 211
            Dresher, PA 19025
            Telephone: (215) 884-2491

                 - and -

            Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen, Esq.
            Krysten Connon, Esq.
            LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
            729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
            Boston, MA 02116
            Telephone: (267) 256-9973

SELECT PORTFOLIO: Bowen Sues Over Denied Recordings' Request
------------------------------------------------------------
James Bowen and Lisa Bowen, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Select Portfolio
Servicing, Inc., Defendant, Case No. 1:23-cv-11231-IT (D. Mass.,
June 1, 2023) arises out of the Defendant's violations of the Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and Regulation X.

Near the end of 2022, the Plaintiffs mailed a qualified written
request to notice of error and request to Defendant. In this
letter, Plaintiffs asked for several documents including a copy of
any and all recordings and a copy of any and all transcripts of
conversations with Plaintiffs or any other person concerning
Plaintiffs' account. The Defendant provided some documents in
response, but ignored Plaintiffs' request for telephone recordings.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs allege that the Defendant has neglected its
duty to provide specific account information available to them upon
receipt of qualified written request and request for information.


Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. is headquartered in West Valley
City, Utah. It is a loan servicing company founded in 1989. It
specializes the servicing of single-family residential mortgage
loans. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

             Nicola S. Yousif, Esq.
             Matthew McKenna, Esq.
             SHIELD LAW, LLC
             157 Belmont St.
             Brockton, MA 02301
             Telephone: 508-588-7300
             E-mail: nick@shieldlaw.com
                     matt@shieldlaw.com

SIEMENS INDUSTRY: Laurence Files Suit in D. South Carolina
----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Siemens Industry Inc.
The case is styled as Karen Laurence, individually and on behalf of
others similarly situated v. Siemens Industry Inc., Case No.
4:23-cv-02521-JD (D.S.C., June 7, 2023).

The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract.

Siemens -- http://www.siemens.com/-- is a German multinational
conglomerate corporation and the largest industrial manufacturing
company in Europe.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Paul J. Doolittle, Esq.
          Blake Garrett Abbott, Esq.
          POULIN WILLEY ANASTOPOULO LLC
          32 Ann Street
          Charleston, SC 29403
          Phone: (843) 834-4712
          Email: pauld@akimlawfirm.com
                 blake@akimlawfirm.com


SIRIUS XM RADIO: Carovillano Sues Over Deceptive Pricing Scheme
---------------------------------------------------------------
CHRISTOPHER CAROVILLANO; and STEVEN BRANDT, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. SIRIUS XM
RADIO INC., Defendant, Case No. 1:23-cv-04723 (S.D.N.Y., June 5,
2023) is an action challenging a false advertising and deceptive
pricing scheme whereby SiriusXM falsely advertises its music plans
at lower prices than it actually charges.

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that SiriusXM fails to
include in its advertised and promised prices the amount of its
invented "U.S. Music Royalty Fee" (the "Fee"), which increases the
true price of its music plans by a whopping 21.4 per cent above the
advertised and promised price for each plan.

SiriusXM falsely advertised the prices of its music plans to the
Plaintiffs and the Class members, and SiriusXM never adequately
disclosed to them that the U.S. Music Royalty Fee would be charged
on top of its advertised prices, increasing those prices by a flat
21.4 per cent for each customer, says the suit.

SIRIUS XM HOLDINGS INC. is an American broadcasting corporation
headquartered in Midtown Manhattan, New York City that provides
satellite radio and online radio services operating in the United
States. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Stephen P. DeNittis, Esq.
          DeNITTIS OSEFCHEN PRINCE, P.C.
          315 Madison Ave., 3rd Fl.
          New York, NY 10017
          Telephone: (646) 979-3642
          Facsimile: (856) 797-9978
          Email: sdenittis@denittislaw.com

               - and -

          Daniel M. Hattis, Esq.
          Paul Karl Lukacs, Esq.
          HATTIS & LUKACS
          11711 SE 8th St, Ste 120
          Bellevue, WA 98005
          Telephone: (425) 233-8650
          Facsimile: (425) 412-7171
          Email: dan@hattislaw.com
                 pkl@hattislaw.com

SOMMERCAL CONCRETE: Villa Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sommercal Concrete,
Inc., et al. The case is styled as Edilfonso Villa, and on behalf
of other persons similarly situated v. Sommercal Concrete, Inc, a
California Corporation, Does 1-10, Case No. 23CV002850 (Cal. Super.
Ct., Sacramento Cty., June 6, 2023).

The case type is stated as " Other Employment Complaint Case."

Sommercal Concrete, Inc. is a concrete contractor in Lemon Hill,
California.[BN]

SPIRIT AIRLINES: Curd Suit Transferred to W.D. Pennsylvania
-----------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Frances Curd, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Spirit Airlines, Inc., Case No.
1:22-cv-03174 was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
District of Maryland, to the U.S. District Court for the Western
District of Pennsylvania on June 6, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:23-cv-00895-MJH to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Statutory Actions.

Spirit Airlines, Inc. -- http://www.spirit.com/-- is a major
United States ultra-low cost airline headquartered in Miramar,
Florida, in the Miami metropolitan area.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          James J. Pizzirusso, Esq.
          HAUSFELD LLP
          888 16th Street, NW, Suite 300
          Washington, D.C. 20006
          Phone: (202) 540-7200
          Email: jpizzirusso@hausfeld.com

               - and -

          Steven M. Nathan, Esq.
          HAUSFELD LLP
          33 Whitehall St., 14th Floor
          New York, NY 10004
          Phone: (646) 357-1100
          Email: snathan@hausfeld.com

               - and -

          Katrina Carroll, Esq.
          LYNCH CARPENTER, LLP
          111 W. Washington St., Suite 1240
          Chicago IL 60602
          Phone: 312.750.1265
          Email: katrina@lcllp.com

               - and -

          Jonathan M. Jagher, Esq.
          FREED KANNER LONDON & MILLEN LLC
          923 Fayette Street
          Conshohocken, PA 19428
          Phone: 610.234.6486
          Email: jjagher@fklmlaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Jordanna Ishmael, Esq.
          Mark A. Salky, Esq.
          Rebekah S Guyon, Esq.
          GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A
          333 SE 2nd Ave., Suite 4400
          Miami, FL 33131
          Phone: (305) 579-0597
          Email: ishmaelj@gtlaw.com
                 salkym@gtlaw.com
                 guyonr@gtlaw.com

               - and -

          Tonya Esposito, Esq.
          GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
          2101 L Street NW, Suite 1000
          Washington, DC 20037
          Phone: (202) 331-3111
          Email: tonya.esposito@gtlaw.com


SPORTS VENTURE INC: Castro Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sports Venture, Inc.
The case is styled as Felix Castro, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Sports Venture, Inc., Case No.
1:23-cv-04655 (S.D.N.Y., June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Sports Venture -- https://www.sportsventure.net/ -- takes the
burden of creating, running, & maintaining your ecommerce site off
your shoulders by taking it all in-house.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noor Abou-Saab, I, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF NOOR A. SAAB
          380 North Broadway, Suite 300
          Jericho, NY 11753
          Phone: (718) 740-5060
          Email: noorasaablaw@gmail.com


STA PARKING: Velez Suit Seeks to Recover OT Wages Under FLSA
------------------------------------------------------------
Noel Velez, Efrain Echevarria, Ariel Burgos, Jose Urbano, and Abdel
Chabur, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly
situated v. S.T.A. Parking Corp., PPS 77 LLC, Michael Zacharias,
and Kathleen McLeod, Case No. 1:23-cv-04786 (S.D.N.Y., June 7,
2023) seeks to recover unpaid wages from the Defendants for
overtime work for which they did not receive overtime premium pay
as required by law, and liquidated damages, pursuant to the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

The Plaintiffs complain that they are entitled to:

       (i) back wages for overtime work for which the Defendants
           willfully failed to pay overtime premium pay as required

           by the New York Labor Law and the supporting New
           York State Department of Labor regulations;

      (ii) compensation for unlawful deductions from their pay;

     (iii) compensation for unlawful retention of the Plaintiffs'
           tips;

      (iv) liquidated damages pursuant to New York Labor Law for
           these violations; and

       (v) compensation for Defendants' violation of the Wage
           Theft Prevention Act.

The Defendants allegedly failed to pay the Plaintiffs an overtime
"bonus" for hours worked beyond 40 hours in a workweek, in
violation of the FLSA, the New York Labor Law, and the supporting
New York State Department of Labor regulations.

Mr. Velez has been working 60 hours per week during his employment
by the Defendants.

Mr. Urbano was working 57 hours per week, except from April through
July 2020, during the pandemic, when he only worked 48 hours per
week.

Mr. Echevarria worked 63 hours per week during his employment by
the Defendant.

The Plaintiffs were each employed as parking attendants at the
Garage, located at 433 East 76th Street, New York, New York.

STA Parking Corp. operates a parking garage.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Michael Samuel, Esq.
          THE SAMUEL LAW FIRM
          1441 Broadway - Suite 6085
          New York, NY 10018
          Telephone: (212) 563-9884
          E-mail: michael@thesamuellawfirm.com

SUNNOVA ENERGY: Davis Suit Removed to C.D. California
-----------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Michael Davis, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Sunnova Energy Corporation, Case No.
CIVSB2303380 was removed from the San Bernardino Superior Court, to
the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on
June 6, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 5:23-cv-01052 to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Consumer Credit.

Sunnova -- https://www.sunnova.com/ -- is a leading national
residential solar company.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Christopher J Rillo
          BAKER BOTTS LLP
          101 California Street Suite 3200
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Phone: (415) 291-6200
          Fax: (415) 291-6300
          Email: christopher.rillo@bakerbotts.com


SWIFT BEEF COMPANY: Meza Suit Removed to C.D. California
--------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned as Francisco J. Meza, on behalf of himself and
other aggrieved employees v. SWIFT BEEF COMPANY; and DOES 1 to 100,
inclusive, Case No. CVRI2301315 was removed from the Superior Court
of the State of California for the County of Riverside, to the
United States District Court for the Central District of California
on June 7, 2023, and assigned Case No. 5:23-cv-01087-JGB-SP.

The Plaintiff alleges Defendant failed to pay minimum wage for all
hours worked; permit lawful meal periods; permit lawful rest
periods; timely pay earned wages during employment; provide
accurate wage statements; and timely pay all earned wages at
separation of employment.[BN]

The Defendant is represented by:

          Michele Ballard Miller, Esq.
          Ethan Chernin, Esq.
          COZEN O'CONNOR
          401 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 850
          Santa Monica, CA 90401
          Phone: (310) 393-4000
          Facsimile: (310) 394-4700
          Email: mbmiller@cozen.com
                 echernin@cozen.com

               - and -

          Jonathon M. Watson, Esq.
          SPENCER FANE LLP
          1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2000
          Denver, CO 80203
          Phone: (303) 839-3800
          Facsimile: (303) 839-3838
          Email: jmwatson@spencerfane.com


T-MOBILE US: Corkins Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri
------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Bryan Corkins, Alexandria Rehman, Patrick
Thornburgh, individually, and on behalf of classes of similarly
situated individuals v. T-Mobile US, Inc., Case No. 2:23-cv-02031
was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the District of
Kansas, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of
Missouri on June 5, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 4:23-cv-00374-BCW to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other P.I.

T-Mobile US, Inc. -- http://www.t-mobile.com/-- is an American
wireless network operator headquartered in Overland Park, Kansas
and Bellevue, Washington.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Eric D. Barton, Esq.
          Thomas P. Cartmell, Esq.
          Tyler W. Hudson, Esq.
          WAGSTAFF & CARTMELL, LLP
          4740 Grand Avenue, Suite 300
          Kansas City, MO 64112
          Phone: (816) 701-1100
          Fax: (816) 531-2372
          Email: ebarton@wcllp.com
                 tcartmell@wcllp.com
                 thudson@wcllp.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Michael W Seitz, Esq.
          SPENCER FANE LLP-KCMO
          1000 Walnut Street, Suite 1400
          Kansas City, MO 64106-2140
          Phone: (816) 292-8277
          Fax: (816) 474-3216
          Email: mseitz@spencerfane.com


T-MOBILE US: Ferguson Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri
-------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Tamara Ferguson, Brian Heinz, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated v. T-Mobile US, Inc.,
T-Mobile USA Inc., Case No. 2:23-cv-00142 was transferred from the
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, to the
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri on June 6,
2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 4:23-cv-00379-BCW to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Personal Property for
Property Damage.

T-Mobile US, Inc. -- http://www.t-mobile.com/-- is an American
wireless network operator headquartered in Overland Park, Kansas
and Bellevue, Washington.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jason T Dennett, Esq.
          Kaleigh Boyd, Esq.
          Kim D Stephens, Esq.
          TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS
          1200 Fifth Ave., Ste. 1700
          Seattle, WA 98101
          Phone: (206) 682-5600
          Fax: (206) 682-2992
          Email: jdennett@tousley.com
                 kboyd@tousley.com
                 kstephens@tousley.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Donald Houser
          Kristine McAlister Brown
          ALSTON & BIRD LLP (GA)
          One Atlantic Center
          1201 W. Peachtree St, Ste 4900
          Atlanta, GA 30309-3432
          Phone: (404) 881-7000
          Fax: (404) 881-7777
          Email: donald.houser@alston.com
                 kristy.brown@alston.com

               - and -

          Lauren Jeffers Tsuji
          PERKINS COIE (SEA)
          1201 3rd Ave., Ste. 4900
          Seattle, WA 98101-3099
          Phone: (206) 359-3577
          Email: LTsuji@perkinscoie.com


T-MOBILE US: Frierson Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri
-------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Lisa Frierson, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA Inc.,
Case No. 4:23-cv-00438 was transferred from the U.S. District Court
for the District of South Carolina, to the U.S. District Court for
the Western District of Missouri on June 5, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 4:23-cv-00377-BCW to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Contract.

T-Mobile US, Inc. -- http://www.t-mobile.com/-- is an American
wireless network operator headquartered in Overland Park, Kansas
and Bellevue, Washington.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Paul J. Doolittle, Esq.
          Blake Garrett Abbott, Esq.
          POULIN WILLEY ANASTOPOULO LLC
          32 Ann Street
          Charleston, SC 29403
          Phone: (843) 834-4712
          Email: pauld@akimlawfirm.com
                 blake@akimlawfirm.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Kurt Matthew Rozelsky, Esq.
          SPENCER FANE LLP
          27 Cleveland Street, Suite 201
          Greenville, SC 29601
          Phone: (864) 695-5200
          Fax: (864) 695-5201
          Email: krozelsky@spencerfane.com


T-MOBILE US: Munoz Suit Transferred to W.D. Missouri
----------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Oscar Munoz, individually. and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA Inc.,
Case No. 2:23-cv-00766 was transferred from the U.S. District Court
for the Central District of California, to the U.S. District Court
for the Western District of Missouri on June 7, 2023.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 4:23-cv-00371-BCW to the
proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Personal Property for
Property Damage.

T-Mobile US, Inc. -- http://www.t-mobile.com/-- is an American
wireless network operator headquartered in Overland Park, Kansas
and Bellevue, Washington.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          William M. Audet, Esq.
          Ling Y. Kuang, Esq.
          Kurt D. Kessler, Esq.
          AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP
          711 Van Ness Ave., Suite 500
          San Francisco, CA 94102-3275
          Phone: 415/568-2555
          Fax: 415/568-2556
          Email: waudet@audetlaw.com
                 lkuang@audetlaw.com
                 kkessler@audetlaw.com

               - and -

          Timothy G. Blood, Esq.
          Paula R. Brown, Esq.
          Jennifer L. Macpherson, Esq.
          BLOOD HURST & O'REARDON, LLP
          501 West Broadway, Suite 1490
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Phone: 619/338-1100
          Fax: 619/338-1101
          Email: tblood@bholaw.com
                 pbrown@bholaw.com
                 jmacpherson@bholaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Lisa L. Garcia, Esq.
          ALSTON AND BIRD LLP
          333 South Hope Street 16th Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Phone: (213) 576-1000
          Fax: (213) 576-1100
          Email: lisa.garcia@alston.com


TACTILE SYSTEMS: $5MM Class Settlement to be Heard on Aug. 23
-------------------------------------------------------------
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP issued the following statement
regarding the Tactile Securities Litigation:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

BRIAN MART, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

TACTILE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Civ No. 0:20-cv-02074-NEB-DTS

CLASS ACTION

SUMMARY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

TO:

ALL PERSONS WHO PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED TACTILE SYSTEMS
TECHNOLOGY, INC. ("TACTILE" OR THE "COMPANY") PUBLICLY TRADED
SECURITIES DURING THE PERIOD FROM MAY 7, 2018 THROUGH JUNE 8, 2020,
INCLUSIVE, AND WERE DAMAGED THEREBY ("CLASS" OR "CLASS MEMBERS")

THIS NOTICE WAS AUTHORIZED BY THE COURT. IT IS NOT A LAWYER
SOLICITATION. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS
ENTIRETY.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a hearing will be held on August 23,
2023, at 10:00 a.m. (Central time), before the Honorable Nancy E.
Brasel via Zoom at the link available at
https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1600690317?pwd=M2RaOHSXFVZHVoR2ErQWl6cXd2UT09,
to determine whether: (1) the proposed settlement (the
"Settlement") of the above-captioned action as set forth in the
Stipulation of Settlement ("Stipulation")1 for $5,000,000 in cash
should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate;
(2) the Judgment as provided under the Stipulation should be
entered dismissing the Litigation with prejudice; (3) to award Lead
Counsel attorneys' fees and expenses out of the Settlement Fund (as
defined in the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class
Action ("Notice"), which is discussed below), and, if so, in what
amounts; and (4) the Plan of Allocation should be approved by the
Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate.

To keep the number of video links to a manageable number, observers
that wish to only watch the hearing shall participate by telephone
using the following information:

Dial: 1‐669‐254‐5252
Meeting ID: 160 069 0317
Passcode: 144682

IF YOU PURCHASED OR ACQUIRED TACTILE PUBLICLY TRADED SECURITIES
FROM MAY 7, 2018 THROUGH JUNE 8, 2020, INCLUSIVE, YOUR RIGHTS MAY
BE AFFECTED BY THE SETTLEMENT OF THIS LITIGATION.

To share in the distribution of the Settlement Fund, you must
establish your rights by submitting a Proof of Claim and Release
form ("Proof of Claim") by mail (postmarked no later than August
23, 2023) or electronically (no later than August 23, 2023). Your
failure to submit your Proof of Claim by August 23, 2023, will
subject your claim to rejection and preclude your receiving any of
the recovery in connection with the Settlement of this Litigation.
If you purchased or acquired Tactile publicly traded securities
from May 7, 2018 through June 8, 2020, inclusive, and do not
request exclusion from the Class, you will be bound by the
Settlement and any judgment and release entered in the Litigation,
including, but not limited to, the Judgment, whether or not you
submit a Proof of Claim.

If you have not received a copy of the Notice, which more
completely describes the Settlement and your rights thereunder
(including your right to object to the Settlement), and a Proof of
Claim, you may obtain these documents, as well as a copy of the
Stipulation (which, among other things, contains definitions for
the defined terms used in this Summary Notice) and other Settlement
documents, online at www.TactileSecuritiesSettlement.com, or by
contacting the Claims Administrator:

Tactile Securities Settlement
Claims Administrator
c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC
P.O. Box 301134
Los Angeles, CA 90030-1134
1-888-846-6829

Inquiries should NOT be directed to Defendants, the Court, or the
Clerk of the Court.

Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice or for a Proof of
Claim, may be made to Lead Counsel:

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
Ellen Gusikoff Stewart
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: 1-800-449-4900
settlementinfo@rgrdlaw.com

IF YOU DESIRE TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE CLASS, YOU MUST SUBMIT A
REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION SUCH THAT IT IS POSTMARKED BY AUGUST 2, 2023,
IN THE MANNER AND FORM EXPLAINED IN THE NOTICE. ALL CLASS MEMBERS
WILL BE BOUND BY THE SETTLEMENT EVEN IF THEY DO NOT SUBMIT A TIMELY
PROOF OF CLAIM.

IF YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO OBJECT TO THE
SETTLEMENT, THE PLAN OF ALLOCATION, THE REQUEST BY LEAD COUNSEL FOR
AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES NOT TO EXCEED 30% OF THE $5,000,000
SETTLEMENT AMOUNT AND EXPENSES NOT TO EXCEED $139,000. ANY
OBJECTIONS MUST BE FILED WITH THE COURT AND SENT TO LEAD COUNSEL
AND DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL BY AUGUST 2, 2023, IN THE MANNER AND FORM
EXPLAINED IN THE NOTICE.

DATED: May 4, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

1 The Stipulation can be viewed and/or obtained at
www.TactileSecuritiesSettlement.com.


TALKSHOPLIVE INC: Ligon Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against TalkShopLive, Inc.
The case is styled as Denette J. Ligon, individually and as the
representative of a class of similarly situated persons v.
TalkShopLive, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-04720 (S.D.N.Y., June 5,
2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Talkshoplive -- https://talkshop.live/ -- is the leading live
stream commerce network and distribution vehicle with a
patent-pending embeddable video player containing sales execution,
allowing transactions to be processed within the video player
anywhere it exists.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dan Shaked, Esq.
          SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.
          14 Harwood Court, Suite 415
          Scarsdale, NY 10583
          Phone: (917) 373-9128
          Email: shakedlawgroup@gmail.com


THEO CHOCOLATE: Dark Chocolate Contains Cadmium, Lead, Suit Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
PAMELA CHESAVAGE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. THEO CHOCOLATE, INC., Defendant, Case No.
5:23-cv-02739-SVK (N.D. Cal, June 2, 2023) arises out of
Defendant's reckless and/or intentional practice of failing to
disclose the presence of cadmium and lead in its dark chocolate
products, including Theo Organic Extra Dark Pure Dark 85% Dark
Chocolate Bar, Theo Organic Pure Dark 70% Dark Chocolate Bar, and
Theo Organic Extra Dark Vanilla Cocoa Nib 85% Dark Chocolate Bar,
among others.

Plaintiff Chesavage alleges claims against the Defendant for fraud
by omission, unjust enrichment, breach of implied warranty of
merchantability, and violations of the California's Unfair
Competition Law, California's False Advertising Law, and
California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Moreover, she seeks both
injunctive and monetary relief on behalf of the proposed class,
including requiring full disclosure of all such substances on the
said products' packaging and restoring monies to the members of the
proposed class, who would not have purchased these products had
they known about the said metallic ingredients.

Theo's principal office, factory, and flagship store are located at
3400 Phinney Avenue North, Seattle, Washington. Defendant is
involved in the production, marketing, distribution, and sale of a
variety of dark chocolate products throughout the U.S. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

            Rebecca A. Peterson, Esq.
            Robert K. Shelquist, Esq.
            LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P.
            100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 2200
            Minneapolis, MN 55401
            Telephone: (612) 339-6900
            Facsimile: (612) 339-0981
            E-mail: rapeterson@locklaw.com
                    rkshelquist@locklaw.com

                    - and -

            Lori G. Feldman, Esq.
            GEORGE FELDMAN MCDONALD, PLLC
            102 Half Moon Bay Drive
            Croton-on-Hudson, NY 10520
            Telephone: (917) 983-9321
            E-mail: LFeldman@4-Justice.com

                    - and -

            David J. George, Esq.
            Brittany L. Brown, Esq.
            GEORGE FELDMAN MCDONALD, PLLC
            9897 Lake Worth Road, Suite #302
            Lake Worth, FL 33467
            Telephone: (561) 232-6002
            E-mail: DGeorge@4-Justice.com
                    BBrown@4-justice.com

                    - and -

            Daniel E. Gustafson, Esq.
            Catherine Sung-Yun K. Smith, Esq.
            Shashi Gowda, Esq.
            GUSTAFSON GLUEK PLLC
            120 South Sixth Street, Suite 2600
            Minneapolis, MN 55402
            Telephone: (612) 333-8844
            Facsimile: (612) 339-6622
            E-mail: dgustafson@gustafsongluek.com
                    csmith@gustafsongluek.com
                    sgowda@gustafsongluek.com
     
                    - and -

            Kenneth A. Wexler, Esq.
            Kara A. Elgersma, Esq.
            WEXLER BOLEY & ELGERSMA LLP
            311 South Wacker Drive, Suite 5450
            Chicago, IL 60606
            Telephone: (312) 346-2222
            Facsimile: (312) 346-0022
            E-mail: kaw@wbe-llp.com
                    kae@wbe-llp.com

                    - and –

            Stephen R. Basser, Esq.
            BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE
            600 West Broadway, Suite 900
            San Diego, CA 92101
            Telephone: (619) 230-0800
            Facsimile: (619) 230-1874
            E-mail: sbasser@barrack.com

                    - and -

            John G. Emerson, Esq.
            EMERSON FIRM, LLC
            2500 Wilcrest Drive, Suite 300
            Houston, TX 77042
            Telephone: (800) 551-8649
            Facsimile: (501) 286-4659
            E-mail: jemerson@emersonfirm.com

                   - and –

            Jonathan M. Jagher, Esq.
            FREED KANNER LONDON AND MILLEN, LLC
            923 Fayette Street
            Conshohocken, PA 19428
            Telephone: (610) 234-6486
            E-mail: jjagher@fklmlaw.com

THERABODY INC: Slade Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Therabody, Inc. The
case is styled as Linda Slade, individually and as the
representative of a class of similarly situated persons v.
Therabody, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-04684 (S.D.N.Y., June 2, 2023).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Therabody, Inc. -- https://www.therabody.com/ -- offers
cutting-edge wellness technology from the makers of Theragun
massage gun.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dan Shaked, Esq.
          SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.
          14 Harwood Court, Suite 415
          Scarsdale, NY 10583
          Phone: (917) 373-9128
          Email: shakedlawgroup@gmail.com


TISHMAN SPEYER: Turner Sues Over Unpaid Wages for Security Guards
-----------------------------------------------------------------
JOEL TURNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. TISHMAN SPEYER PROPERTIES, INC., d/b/a
TISHMAN SPEYER and RCPI HOLDCO, L.L.C., Defendants, Case No.
1:23-cv-04928 (S.D.N.Y., June 12, 2023) is a class action against
the Defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and
the New York Labor Law including failure to pay regular and
overtime wages, failure to provide wage notice, and failure to
provide accurate wage statements.

The Plaintiff worked as a security guard at the Defendants'
headquarters, located at Rockefeller Center, 45 Rockefeller Plaza,
New York, New York from December 5, 2022 until January 23, 2023.

Tishman Speyer Properties, Inc., doing business as Tishman Speyer,
is a real estate company, located at 45 Rockefeller Plaza, New
York, New York.

RCPI Holdco, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tishman Speyer
Properties, Inc., located at 45 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New
York. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         C.K. Lee, Esq.
         Anne Seelig, Esq.
         LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC
         148 West 24th Street, Eighth Floor
         New York, NY 10011
         Telephone: (212) 465-1188
         Facsimile: (212) 465-1181

TLCS INC: Green-Dominguez Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against TLCS, INC., et al.
The case is styled as Jazmyn Green-Dominguez, and on behalf of
other members of the general public similarly situated v. TLCS,
INC., HOPE Cooperative, Does 1-100, Case No. 23CV002859 (Cal.
Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., June 6, 2023).

The case type is stated as " Other Employment Complaint Case."

TLCS has been providing mental health and supportive housing
service for people with mental health challenges for over 35 years
in Sacramento County.[BN]

TOP FLIGHT REGISTRY: Minor Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Top Flight Registry,
Inc., et al. The case is styled as Rochell Minor, on behalf of
himself and others similarly situated and/or aggrieved employees of
Defendants v. Top Flight Registry, Inc., Ulmus Holdings, LLC, Does
1-50, Case No. 23CV002904 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., June
7, 2023).

The case type is stated as "Other Employment Complaint Case."

Top Flight Registry, Inc. -- https://www.topflightregistry.com/ --
is a home health care service in California.[BN]

NOTE: There are no professionals stated in the doc.

TOTAL CARE RX: Fails to Pay Proper Wages, Bohler Suit Claims
------------------------------------------------------------
RAMELL BOHLER, Individually and on behalf of all other persons
similarly situated, Plaintiff v. TOTAL CARE RX, INC., Defendant,
Case No. 1:23-cv-04065 (E.D.N.Y., June 1, 2023) arises out of the
Defendant's violations of the New York Labor Law and the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Total Care RX employed Plaintiff as a driver from February 15, 2022
to December 13, 2022. He spent more than 25% of his time performing
physical labor that includes unloading packages, stacking packages
and delivering packages to Total Care RX's customers/patients. In
addition, he worked six days per week, from 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM.,
totaling 48 hours per week, at least two weeks per month. However,
Total Care RX failed to pay Plaintiff the overtime compensation in
violation of FLSA and NYLL. Moreover, Total Care RX failed to pay
Plaintiff and the Class members not later than seven days after the
end of the week in which the wages are earned in violation of NYLL,
says the suit.

Total Care RX is a domestic business corporation that is organized
and existing under the laws of the State of New York, which is
licensed to do business in the State of New York. Total Care RX is
a full-service, specialty pharmacy. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

            Douglas B. Lipsky, Esq.
            LIPSKY LOWE LLP
            420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1830
            New York, NY 10017-6705
            Telephone: (212) 392-4772
            E-mail: doug@lipskylowe.com

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: Moala Files Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Traffic Management,
Inc. The case is styled as Samuel Moala, Renee Buckley,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
Traffic Management, Inc., Case No. 23CV034857 (Cal. Super. Ct.,
Alameda Cty., June 2, 2023).

The case type is stated as " Other Employment Complaint Case."

Traffic Management, Inc. -- https://www.trafficmanagement.com/ --
is a full service traffic management company.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Zachary Crosner, Esq.
          CROSNER LEGAL, P.C.
          9440 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 301
          Beverly Hills, CA 90210
          Phone: (310) 496-5818
          Fax: (310) 510-6429
          Email: zach@crosnerlegal.com


UNITED STATES: Class Deal in Avendano v. ICE Wins Final Approval
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, Wilfredo FAVELA AVENDANO, et al.,
Petitioners-Plaintiffs v. Drew BOSTOCK, Director of the Seattle
Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.,
Respondents-Defendants, Case No. 20-cv-700-JLR (W.D. Wash.), Judge
James L. Robart of the U.S. District Court for the Western District
of Washington grants the Parties' Stipulated Motion to Dismiss and
Grant Final Approval of the class action settlement.

Judge Robart has carefully considered the Class Settlement
Agreement together with all exhibits thereto, all the filings
related to the settlement, the arguments of counsel, and the record
in the case. He also held a fairness hearing on May 30, 2023,
following notice to the class as approved by the Court's previous
order granting preliminary approval of the Agreement. He finds that
the Agreement is sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate.

The case is dismissed with prejudice. The Parties will bear their
own attorney's fees and costs, except as provided by the Agreement.
The Agreement is incorporated by reference in the Order and all
terms or phrases used therein will have the same meaning as in the
Agreement.

Judge Robart grants the Parties' Stipulated Motion for Final
Approval and approves the proposed class-wide relief set forth in
the Agreement. He grants final approval of the Agreement.

The Court previously certified the class as All individuals
detained at the Northwest Detention Center who are age 55 years or
older or have medical conditions that place them at heightened risk
of severe illness or death from COVID-19 as determined by Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. This is also the
class for settlement purposes.

As specified in the Agreement, and notwithstanding the dismissal of
the case, the Court will retain jurisdiction over all disputes
between and among the Parties arising out of the Agreement,
including but not limited to interpretation and enforcement of the
terms of the Agreement, except as otherwise provided in the
Agreement, for a term of one year after Final Approval because the
Presidential national emergency declaration concerning COVID-19
expired on May 11, 2023.

Neither the settlement, nor any exhibit, document, nor instrument
delivered thereunder will be construed as or deemed to be evidence
of an admission or concession by the Defendants or an
interpretation of any liability or wrongdoing by Defendants, or of
the truth of any allegations asserted by the Plaintiffs, the Class
Members, or any other person.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 30, 2023 Order is available at
https://tinyurl.com/2tehdsc7 from Leagle.com.

Matt Adams, Aaron Korthuis, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project,
Seattle, WA, Tim Henry Warden-Hertz, Northwest Immigrant Rights
Project, Tacoma, WA, LaRond Baker, American Civil Liberties Union
of Washington, Seattle, WA, NICHOLAS BROWN, United States Attorney,
MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, Assistant United States Attorney United States
Attorney's Office, Tacoma, WA, JAMES C. STRONG, Assistant United
States Attorney United States Attorney's Office, Seattle, WA,
Attorneys for Federal Respondents-Defendants.

Joan K. Mell -- info@3brancheslaw.com -- III Branches Law, PLLC,
Fircrest, WA, Attorney for Respondent-Defendant the Facility
Administrator of the Northwest ICE Processing Center.

David C. Fathi,* Eunice H. Cho, American Civil Liberties Union
Foundation National Prison Project, Washington, DC, Omar C.
Jadwat,* American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Immigrants'
Rights Project, New York, NY, My Khanh Ngo -- mngo@aclu.org --
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Immigrants' Rights
Project, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs *Admitted pro
hac vice **Not admitted in D.C.; practice limited to federal
courts

JAMES C. STRONG, Assistant United States Attorney United States
Attorney's Office, Seattle, WA.


UNITED STATES: Stipulated Bid to Dismiss Avendano v. ICE Granted
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, WILFREDO FAVELA AVENDANO, et al.,
Petitioners-Plaintiffs, v. DREW BOSTOCK, et al.,
Respondents-Defendants, Case No. C20-0700 JLR (W.D. Wash.), Judge
James L. Robart of the U.S. District Court for the Western District
of Washington, Seattle, grants the parties' stipulated motion to
dismiss and for final approval of the proposed class action
settlement in the matter.

The action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues
have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 30, 2023 Judgment is available
at https://tinyurl.com/2uk5hbe9 from Leagle.com.


UPFIELD US: Faces Skzynear Class Suit Over Oil Spreads' False Ads
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Laura Skzynear, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Upfield US Inc., Case No. 8:23-cv-01277-WFJ-CPT (M.D.
Fla., June 7, 2023) alleges that the Defendant violated and
continues to violate Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices
Act by misrepresenting the Plant Butter vegetable oil spreads made
with alternative vegetable oils, i.e., "Made With Olive Oil" under
its Country Crock brand ("Product") through statements, omissions,
ambiguities, half-truths and/or actions, that it was made with a
significant and/or predominant amount of the promoted ingredient,
olive oil, as opposed to mainly palm and canola oils.

The consumers are misled because they expect "Made With Olive Oil"
with pictures of olives to mean the Product contains more than a
relatively de minimis amount of this valued ingredient. The
ingredient list shows olive oil is the smallest part of the
vegetable oil blend, less than palm kernel oil, canola oil, and
palm fruit oil. The amount of olive oil is insufficient to confer
health it is known for, the Plaintiff contends.

As a result of the false and misleading representations, the
Product is sold at a premium price, approximately no less than
$3.99 for 10.5 OZ, excluding tax and sales, higher than similar
products, represented in a non-misleading way, and higher than it
would be sold for absent the misleading representations and
omissions, the Plaintiff claims.

The Plaintiff is a citizen of Venice, Sarasota County, Florida. She
purchased the Product on one or more occasions at stores including
Publix in Venice, Florida between July 2020 and May 2023.

Upfield US manufactures, labels, markets, and sells Plant Butter
vegetable oil spreads made with alternative vegetable oils, i.e.,
"Made With Olive Oil."[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          William Wright, Esq.
          THE WRIGHT LAW OFFICE, P.A.
          515 N Flagler Dr Ste P300
          West Palm Beach FL 33401
          Telephone: (561) 514-0904
          E-mail: willwright@wrightlawoffice.com

                - and -

          Spencer Sheehan, Esq.
          SHEEHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          60 Cuttermill Rd Ste 412
          Great Neck NY 11021
          Telephone: (516) 268-7080
          E-mail: spencer@spencersheehan.com

US FOODS: Illegally Collects Employees' Biometrics, Trent Claims
----------------------------------------------------------------
DAVID TRENT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. US FOODS, INC., Defendant, Case No.
2023LA000613 (Ill. Cir. Ct., 18th Jud. Cir., Dupage Cty., June 12,
2023) is a class action against the Defendant for violations of the
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act.

According to the complaint, the Defendant is engaged in collecting,
capturing, storing, using, and/or otherwise obtaining the
Plaintiff's and similarly situated employees' biometric identifiers
and biometric information without obtaining informed written
consent or providing or complying with the requisite data retention
and destruction policies, in direct violation of BIPA. Moreover,
the Defendant failed to provide a publicly available retention
schedule or guidelines for permanently destroying biometric
identifiers and biometric information as specified by BIPA, says
the suit.

US Foods, Inc. is a food service distributor, with its principal
place of business at 9399 West Higgins Road, Suite 100, Rosemont,
Illinois. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:                
      
         J. Dominick Larry, Esq.
         NICK LARRY LAW LLC
         1720 W. Division Street
         Chicago, IL 60622
         Telephone: (773) 694-4690
         E-mail: nick@nicklarry.law

                 - and -

         Joseph I. Marchese, Esq.
         Philip L. Fraietta, Esq.
         Max S. Roberts, Esq.
         BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
         888 Seventh Avenue
         New York, NY 10019
         Telephone: (646) 837-7150
         Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
         E-mail: jmarchese@bursor.com
                 pfraietta@bursor.com
                 mroberts@bursor.com

VIRGINIA CREDIT: Brown Sues Over Improper Overdraft Fee Collection
------------------------------------------------------------------
NICOLE BROWN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. VIRGINIA CREDIT UNION, INC., Defendant, Case
No. 3:23-cv-00361-RCY (E.D. Va., May 31, 2023) is a class action
arising from the Defendant's routine practices of assessing $35
fees ("OD Fees") on transactions that did not actually overdraw
checking accounts, and multiple fees on an item.

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant is
engaged in improper scheme to extract funds from account holders
has victimized Plaintiff and hundreds of other similarly situated
consumers. Unless enjoined, the Defendant will continue to engage
in these schemes and will continue to cause substantial injury to
its consumers, says the Plaintiff.

VIRGINIA CREDIT UNION, INC. operates as a financial cooperative.
The Union provides financial solutions such as saving and checking
accounts, loans, insurance, credit and debit cards, mortgage, ATMs,
online banking, and other related services. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

         Devon J. Munro, Esq.
         MUNRO BYRD, P.C.
         120 Day Ave. SW, First Floor
         Roanoke, VA 24016
         Telephone: (540) 283-9343
         Facsimile: (540) 328-9290
         Email: dmunro@trialsva.com

              - and -

         Christopher D. Jennings, Esq.
         Tyler B. Ewigleben, Esq.
         Winston S. Hudson, Esq.
         JOHNSON FIRM
         610 President Clinton Avenue, Suite 300
         Little Rock, ARK 72201
         Telephone: (501) 372-1300
         Email: chris@yourattorney.com
                tyler@yourattorney.com
                winston@yourattorney.com

              - and -

         Sophia G. Gold, Esq.
         KALIELGOLD PLLC
         950 Gilman Street, Suite 200
         Berkeley, CA 94710
         Telephone: (202) 350-4783
         Email: sgold@kalielgold.com

              - and -

         Jeffrey D. Kaliel, Esq.
         KALIELGOLD PLLC
         1100 15th Street NW, 4th Floor
         Washington, D.C. 20005
         Telephone: (202) 280-4783
         Email: jkaliel@kalielgold.com

WINERY EXCHANGE: Web Site Not Accessible to Blind, Bunting Says
---------------------------------------------------------------
RASHETA BUNTING, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. WINERY EXCHANGE, INC., Defendant, Case No.
1:23-cv-04104 (E.D.N.Y., June 2, 2023) alleges Defendant's
violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Defendant's Web
site, http//:www.Breadandbutterwines.com, is not fully or equally
accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, including the
Plaintiff, in violation of the ADA.

Winery Exchange, Inc. creates and markets private brands of wine,
spirits, and beer. The Company sources beer, wine, and spirits from
regions throughout the world and markets private brands to major
retailers worldwide. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dan Shaked, Esq.
          SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.
          14 Harwood Court, Suite 415
          Scarsdale, NY 10583
          Telephone. (917) 373-9128
          Email: ShakedLawGroup@gmail.com

YUM BRANDS: Fails to Protect Customers' Private Info, Knighten Says
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DAVID KNIGHTEN, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff v. YUM BRANDS, INC., CHARTER CENTRAL, LLC AND
CHARTER FOODS, INC, Defendants, Case No. 3:23-cv-00274-BJB (W.D.
Ky., May 31, 2023), alleges claims for negligence, breach of
confidence, breach of implied contract, and breach of the implied
covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with the
Defendants' failure to properly secure and safeguard Plaintiff's
and class members' personally identifiable information stored
within Defendant's information network.

While Defendants claims to have discovered the breach as early as
January 13, 2023, Defendant failed to inform Plaintiff until April
7, 2023, vis-a-vis a mailed letter. Moreover, the Defendants
unlawfully breached their duty to timely disclose to Plaintiff and
Class members that the PII within their possession might have been
compromised and precisely the type of information compromised, says
the suit.

Yum Brands is a corporation with a principal place of business
located at 1441 Gardiner Lane, Louisville, KY. The company operates
as a franchisor of several fast-food brands including KFC, Taco
Bell, Pizza Hut and The Habit Burger Grill. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Joseph M. Lyon, Esq.
          THE LYON LAW FIRM
          2754 Erie Ave.
          Cincinnati, OH 45208
          Telephone: (513) 381-2333
          Facsimile: (513) 766-9011
          E-mail: jlyon@thelyonfirm.com

                  - and -

          Cody A. Bolce, Esq.
          COLE & VAN NOTE
          555 12th Street, Suite 1725
          Oakland, CA 94607
          Telephone: (510) 891-9800
          Facsimile: (510) 891-7030
          E-mail: cab@colevannote.com

                  - and -

          Daniel Srourian, Esq.
          SROURIAN LAW FIRM, P.C.
          3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1710
          Los Angeles, CA 90010
          Telephone: (213) 474-3800
          Email: daniel@slfla.com


                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Rousel Elaine T.
Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L.
Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2023. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***