/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/CAR_Public/210419.mbx               C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, April 19, 2021, Vol. 23, No. 72

                            Headlines

A. CIOLLI: Hunt Files Suit in North District of Illinois
ADMIN RECOVERY: Fulgencio FDCPA Suit Removed to S.D. New York
ADVANCED HOME: Bronson Files TCPA Suit in W.D. Wisconsin
AFFINITY LIFESTYLES.COM: Faces Suit Over Defective Alkaline Water
ALTITUDE GROUP: Carango TCPA Suit Seeks to Certify Three Classes

ART OF TEA: Sosa Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
BAKER MILLS: Hinkley Files Suit in District of Utah
BETHESDA SOFTWORKS: Devine Suit Transferred to District of Maryland
BNY MELLON: Bernard Suit Seeks to Certify Class of Beneficiaries
BOISE SCHOOL: Zeyen et al., File Renewed Bid for Class Status

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS: Sansone Seeks to Certify Vacation Pay Class
CITRIX SYSTEMS: Conditional Cert. of FLSA Collective Action Sought
DELAWARE COUNTY: Burford Suit Seeks to Certify Class
ENBRIDGE INC: Robertson Files Suit in District of Colorado
EQT CORP: Certification of Class Action Sought in Securities Suit

EXPERIAN INFORMATION: Benhayun Files FCRA Suit in E.D. New York
FEDERAL EXPRESS: Fischer Appeals Ruling in FLSA Suit to 3rd Cir.
FERNY PROPERTIES: Court Finds Tompkins Bid to Certify Class as Moot
GERBER PRODUCTS: McNealy Suit Transferred to District of New Jersey
HEALTHCARE REVENUE: Santos Suit Seeks to Certify Class of Consumers

HEAT TREATING: Davis Gets Amended FLSA Collective Conditional Cert.
HERTZ CORPORATION: Viking Appeals Class Cert. Ruling in Denicolo
HUB INTERNATIONAL: Gonzalez Seeks to Certify Class of Employees
INTERNATIONAL TRAINING: Catalina Files Suit in Cal. Superior Court
KADMON HOLDINGS: Pomerantz Law Reminds of June 2 Deadline

KELLEY LAW: Francis-Luster Seeks to Notify Class of Paralegals
LINK SNACKS: Sosa Files ADA Suit in Southern District of New York
MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL: Scoma Suit Seeks to Certify Two Classes
MOBILE TELESYSTEMS: Salim Appeals Securities Suit Dismissal
NEW JERSEY: Court Certifies Class in J.M. Suit

NORTHSTAR LOCATION: Klapperich Seeks to Certify FDCPA Class
OKLAHOMA: Court Tosses Bid for Class Certification in Beard Suit
PARTNER COMMS: Facing Ancillary Service Related Suit
PARTNER COMMS: Facing CSC Operating Hours Related Suit
PARTNER COMMS: Facing Non-Disclosure of Interests Rates Class Suit

PARTNER COMMS: Facing Spam Related Putative Class Suit
PARTNER COMMS: Facing Unlawful Anti-Virus/Spam Fee Charging Suit
QUALITY BLACKTOP: Second Cir. Appeal Filed in Hernandez FLSA Suit
RECON OILFIELD: FLSA Collective Wins Conditional Certification
RUANE & CUNNIFF: Ferguson Suit Seeks to Certify Class Action

SAN ANTONIO, TX: Payne Appeals Civil Rights Suit Ruling to 5th Cir.
SELECT MEDICAL: Arends Suit Seeks Circulation of Notice to Class
SOKOLIN LLC: Sosa Files ADA Suit in Southern District of New York
SWEET SHOP: Sosa Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: Santiago Suit Seeks to Certify Class

VBFS INC: Conditional Certification of Employee Collective Sought

                            *********

A. CIOLLI: Hunt Files Suit in North District of Illinois
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against A. Ciolli, et al. The
case is styled as Maurice Hunt, and similarly situated individuals
v. A. Ciolli, Warden; Kruger, FNN(HSA); J. Leonowicz, Captain;
Borden, FNU(Unit Manager); Case No. 3:21-cv-50156 (N.D. Ill., April
14, 2021).

The nature of suit is stated as Civil Rights for Prisoner Civil
Rights.

A. Ciolli is a Warden at the Federal Bureau of Prisons in Thomson,
Illinois.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se:

          Maurice Hunt
          P.O. Box 1002
          Thomson, IL 61285
          #70092-097
          AUSP Thomson
          PRO SE


ADMIN RECOVERY: Fulgencio FDCPA Suit Removed to S.D. New York
-------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Yohan M. Fulgencio, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. Admin Recovery, LLC, John and Jane
Does 1-10, Case No. 803165/2021E, was removed from the Supreme
Court of New York, Bronx County, to the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York on April 13, 2021.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:21-cv-03185 to the
proceeding.

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act.

Admin Recovery -- https://www.adminrecovery.com/ -- is a national,
full-service provider of receivable management services.[BN]

The Plaintiff appears pro se.

The Defendants are represented by:

          Michael Thomas Etmund, Esq.
          MOSS & BARNETT
          150 S Fifth Street, Ste 1200
          Minneapoilis, MN 55402
          Phone: (612) 877-5309
          Fax: (612) 877-5050
          Email: mike.etmund@lawmoss.com


ADVANCED HOME: Bronson Files TCPA Suit in W.D. Wisconsin
--------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Advanced Home
Technologies, Inc. The case is styled as Angela Bronson, Paul
Hinzman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Advanced Home Technologies, Inc. doing business as: AHT
Wisconsin Windows, Case No. 3:21-cv-00247 (W.D. Wis., April 14,
2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act.

AHT Wisconsin Windows -- https://www.ahtwindows.com/ -- is a
licensed contractor in the State of Wisconsin.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Anthony Paronich, Esq.
          BRODERICK LAW, P.C.
          125 Summer St., Suite 1030
          Boston, MA 02110
          Phone: (508) 221-1510
          Email: anthony@paronichlaw.com

               - and -

          Samuel J. Strauss, Esq.
          TURKE & STRAUSS, LLP
          613 Williamson Street, Suite 201
          Madison, WI 53703
          Phone: (608) 237-1775
          Email: sam@turkestrauss.com


AFFINITY LIFESTYLES.COM: Faces Suit Over Defective Alkaline Water
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MICHELLE KARAJELIAN, TRACI ELLIS, MINDY CHARUSARN on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, v. AFFINITY
LIFESTYLES.COM, INC., d/b/a REAL WATER, Case No.
2:21-cv-00465-JAD-EJY (March 22, 2021) is a civil class action
brought by the Plaintiffs on behalf of consumers who purchased the
Defendant's "Real Water" brand alkaline water for personal use (the
Product).

According to the complaint, the Defendant formulates, manufactures,
advertises, and sells the Product to consumers. Unbeknown to the
Plaintiffs and members of the Classes at the time of their
purchase, and contrary to the express and implied representations
made by Defendant in respect to the Product, the Product is
defective, is deceptively advertised, and causes undesired side
effects to consumers, including liver failure, hospitalization,
fever, vomiting, nausea, loss of appetite, and fatigue, which, if
known to Plaintiffs and members of the Classes, would have caused
the Plaintiffs and members of the Classes not to purchase or use
the Product.

As a result, the Plaintiffs and Class Members have been, and
continue to be harmed, by having purchased the Product under false
pretenses, and paying for the Product while receiving something
worthless in return.

The Plaintiffs and the Classes thus bring claims for negligence,
violation of consumer protection statutes, and unjust enrichment
seeking equitable relief and/or money damages, and reasonable
attorneys' fees.

The Defendant Affinitylifestyles.com, Inc. is incorporated in
Nevada with its principal place of business at 3773 Howard Hughes
Pkwy, STE 500S, Las Vegas, Nevada. The Defendant bottles water and
sells it across the Southwest United States-including Nevada, Utah,
Arizona, New Mexico, and the Los Angeles area. The Defendant sells
the Product in major retail chains and many other stores, including
at Sprouts, Whole Foods, and Costco.

The Product comes in a variety of sizes and is available in ready
to drink bottles. Customers can choose between 500mL, 750mL, 1
liter, and 1.5-liter bottles. A 1-gallon bottle option is in the
works. Aside from the ready-to-drink option, Real Water also comes
in a 5-gallon bottle for home deliveries.

The Defendant touts itself as "a premium drinking water with 9.0
pH" that "can help your body to restore balance and reach your full
potential."

The Defendant touts that its water provides key benefits including
that it supposedly deactivates pepsin, an enzyme that causes acid
reflux, benefits people who have high blood pressure, diabetes, and
high cholesterol, and enables blood to flow more efficiently and
increasing oxygen delivery throughout the body.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          David Hilton Wise, Esq.
          WISE LAW FIRM, PLC
          421 Court Street
          Reno, NE, 89501
          Telephone: (775) 329-1766
          Facsimile: (775) 329-2432
          E-mail: dwise@wiselaw.pro

ALTITUDE GROUP: Carango TCPA Suit Seeks to Certify Three Classes
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Matthew Carango and Fred
Heidarpour, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, v. The Altitude Group, LLC d/b/a Core Home
Security, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Case No.
9:21-cv-80148-DMM (S.D. Fla.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to
enter an order certifying three Classes that consists of the
following people:

   -- Pre-Recorded Voice Cellphone Class

      "All persons in the United States who from four years prior
      to the filing of the initial complaint in this action to the

      date notice is sent to the Class: (1) Defendant, or a third
      person acting on behalf of the Defendant, called, (2) on the

      person's wireless telephone; (3) using the same equipment
      that was used to call Carango; (4) for the purpose of
      marketing Alarm.com or other home security products and
      systems; and (5) for whom Defendant claims it obtained prior

      express consent in the same manner as the Defendant claims it

      supposedly obtained prior express consent to call the
      Plaintiff;"

   -- Pre-Recorded Voice Landline Class

      "All persons in the United States who from four years prior
      to the filing of the initial complaint in this action to the

      date notice is sent to the Class: (1) Defendant, or a third
      person acting on behalf of the Defendant, called, (2) on the

      person’s residential landline telephone; (3) using the same

      equipment that was used to call Heidarpour; (4) for the
      purpose of marketing Alarm.com or other home security
      products and systems; and (5) for whom the Defendant claims
      it obtained prior express consent in the same manner as the
      Defendant claims it supposedly obtained prior express consent

      to call the Plaintiff;" and

   -- DNC Registry Class:

      "All persons in the United States who from four years prior
      to the filing of the initial complaint in this action to the

      date notice is sent to the Class: (1) Defendant, or a third
      person acting on behalf of Defendant, called at least twice,

      (2) on the person's wireless or landline telephone; (3) for
      the purpose of marketing Alarm.com or other home security
      products and systems; (4) where the telephone number called
      had been registered on the Do Not Call registry for at least

      30 days; and (5) for whom Defendant claims it obtained prior

      express consent in the same manner as Defendant claims it
      supposedly obtained prior express consent to call the
      Plaintiff."

This lawsuit challenges pre-recorded phone calls that CHS placed to
Plaintiffs without prior express written consent and including to
those whose numbers are on the National Do Not Call Registry, all
in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

CHS is a home security system company that offers Alarm.com home
security alarm systems and related products and services to
homeowners. In its zeal to gain an advantage in this competitive
space, CHS turns to telemarketing. Unfortunately, as Plaintiffs
allege, such telemarketing efforts violate the TCPA. The Plaintiff
contends that CHS has violated the TCPA uniformly with respect to
the entire Class.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion to certify class dated April 5,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3mMGYNH
at no extra charge.[CC]

Attorneys for the Plaintiff and the Class are:

          Ryan S. Shipp, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF RYAN S. SHIPP, PLLC
          814 Lantana Road, Suite 1
          Lake Worth, FL 33462
          Telephone: (561) 699-0399
          E-mail: ryan@shipplawoffice.com

               - and -

          Steven L. Woodrow, Esq.
          Patrick H. Peluso, Esq.
          Woodrow & Peluso, LLC
          3900 East Mexico Ave., Suite 300
          Denver, CO 80210
          Telephone: (720) 213-0675
          E-mail: swoodrow@woodrowpeluso.com
                  ppeluso@woodrowpeluso.com

ART OF TEA: Sosa Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against The Art Of Tea, LLC.
The case is styled as Yony Sosa, on behalf of himself and sll other
persons similarly situated v. The Art Of Tea, LLC, Case No.
1:21-cv-03227 (S.D.N.Y., April 13, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Art of Tea -- https://www.artoftea.com/ -- is an organic online tea
shop with a wide variety of loose-leaf, packaged teas, teaware, tea
gifts & more.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael A. LaBollita, Esq.
          GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
          150 E. 18 St., Suite PHR
          New York, NY 10003
          Phone: (212) 228-9795
          Email: michael@gottlieb.legal


BAKER MILLS: Hinkley Files Suit in District of Utah
---------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Baker Mills, et al.
The case is styled as Alex Hinkley, Megan Taylor, Shiela Crawford,
as an individuals, on behalf of themselves, the general public and
those similarly situated v. Baker Mills, Kodiak Cakes, Case No.
2:21-cv-00221-BSJ (D. Utah, April 13, 2021).

The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud.

Baker Mills, Inc., doing business as Kodiak Cakes --
https://kodiakcakes.com/ -- provides bakery products. The Company
offers waffle, flapjack, muffins, desserts, cakes, and other
related products.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jason E. Greene, Esq.
          ANDERSON & KARRENBERG
          50 W. Broadway, Ste. 700
          Salt Lake City, UT 84101
          Phone: (801) 534-1700
          Email: jgreene@aklawfirm.com


BETHESDA SOFTWORKS: Devine Suit Transferred to District of Maryland
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as Jacob Devine, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Robinhood Financial LLC, Bethesda
Softworks LLC, Bethesda Softworks, ZeniMax Media Inc., Case No.
1:21-mc-91073, was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts to the U.S. District Court for the
District of Maryland on April 13, 2021.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 8:21-cv-00916-PWG to the
proceeding.

Bethesda Softworks LLC -- https://bethesda.net/en/dashboard -- is
an American video game publisher based in Rockville, Maryland.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Filippo Marchino, Esq.
          Thomas E Gray, Esq.
          THE X-LAW GROUP PC
          625 South Fair Oaks Ave. Ste. 390
          South Pasadena, CA 91030
          Phone: (213) 599-3380
          Fax: (213) 599-3370
          Email: fm@xlawx.com
                 tg@xlawx.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Anna Naydonov, Esq.
          FINNEGAN LLP
          901 New York Ave., N.W.
          Washington, DC 20001
          Phone: (202) 408-4000
          Fax: (202) 408-4400
          Email: anna.naydonov@finnegan.com


BNY MELLON: Bernard Suit Seeks to Certify Class of Beneficiaries
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JOHN BERNARD, WILLIAM
BERNARD, and PAMELA MARTIN, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, v. BNY MELLON, N.A., Case No.
2:18-cv-00783-RJC-CRE (W.D. Pa.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to
enter an order certifying the following class pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b):

   "All beneficiaries of trusts: (a) whose situs is the United
   States or any State thereof; (b) of which at any time from
   January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2007, any affiliate of Mellon
   Financial Corporation was the trustee or, at any time from July

   1, 2007, to the present, defendant BNY Mellon, N.A. was or is
   the trustee; (c) that were open at any time after June 15, 2013;

   (d) in which the trustee had or has sole discretion to invest
   the assets of the trust; and (e) in which the trustee invested
   money in mutual funds actively managed by The Dreyfus
   Corporation at any time from January 1, 2003, unless different
   dates are stated for a particular fund."

   Excluded from the class are BNY Mellon, N.A. and its corporate
   parent and affiliates; the directors, officers, employees, and
   agents of any of them; and the United States Government.

   The class shall comprise two subclasses:

   (A) beneficiaries of trusts that are open on the date of
       judgment; and

   (B) beneficiaries of trusts that were closed before the date of

       judgment.

The Plaintiffs further ask that the Court appoint John Bernard,
William Bernard, and Pamela Martin as class representatives, and
appoint Reisinger, Comber & Miller, LLC and Grais & Ellsworth LLP
as class counsel.

BNY Mellon, National Association provides banking services. The
Company offers institutional asset management, mutual funds,
private wealth management.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion to certify class dated April 5,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3dgFojY
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          David J. Grais, Esq.
          Kathryn C. Ellsworth, Esq.
          Vickie Reznik, Esq.
          Maria Heifetz, Esq.
          GRAIS & ELLSWORTH LLP
          950 Third Avenue, 24th Floor
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212) 755-0100

               - and -

          Michael A. Comber, Esq.
          REISINGER COMBER & MILLER, LLC
          300 Koppers Building
          436 Seventh Avenue
          Pittsburgh, PA 15219
          Telephone: (412) 894-1380

BOISE SCHOOL: Zeyen et al., File Renewed Bid for Class Status
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MIKE ZEYEN, et al., v.
BOISE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00207-BLW (D.
Idaho), the Plaintiffs file a renewed motion for class
certification:

   -- The Plaintiffs request that the class be
      certified as to the three school districts of Bonneville,
      Pocatello, and West Ada, with the named Plaintiffs being
      awarded the status of Class Representatives.

   -- That all proceedings (including Discovery) be stayed in the
      remaining school districts pending further order of this
      court.

   -- The Defendants have requested in their Litigation Plan that
      the Defendants in category 2 above have their cases
      dismissed. No such motion is before this Court, nor would
      such be justified.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated April 2, 2020 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3a95Bz2 at no extra
charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Robert C. Huntley, Esq.
          R. HUNTLEY LAW,  PLLC
          2229 W. State Street
          P.O. Box 2188
          Boise, Idaho 83701
          Telephone: (208) 388-1230
          Facsimile: (208) 388-0234
          E-mail: rhuntley@huntleylaw.com

               - and -

          T. Jason Wood, Esq.
          WOOD LAW GROUP, PC
          1488 Midway Avenue
          Idaho Falls, ID 83406
          Telephone: (208) 497-0400
          Facsimile: (208) 932-4380
          E-mail: jason@woodlaw.net

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS: Sansone Seeks to Certify Vacation Pay Class
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JENNIFER M. SANSONE, and
BALDEMAR ORDUNO, JR., Individually and on Behalf of Other Members
of the Public Similarly Situated, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, AND TWC ADMINISTRATION, LLC, Case No.
3:17-cv-01880-WQH-JLB (S.D. Calif.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court
to enter an order:

   1. certifying the following Vacation Pay Class:

      "Any and all persons who were employed by TWC Administration
      LLC in the state of California and who became employed by
      Charter Communications, LLC without being paid out the
      vacation wages they had accrued at TWC 13 Administration
      LLC;"

   2. appointing Plaintiff Sansone and Plaintiff Orduno as
      representatives of the Vacation Pay Class; and

   3. appointing the Plaintiffs' counsel as counsel for the
      Vacation Pay Class, and requiring the Defendants TWCA
      Administration LLC and Charter Communications, Inc. to
      identify all members of the Vacation Pay Class so that notice

      of this action and their opt-out rights under Federal Rules
      of Civil Procedure, Rule 23(c)(2) may be provided to them.

Charter Communications is an American telecommunications and mass
media company with services branded as Charter Spectrum.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion to certify class dated April 5,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/32itOOR
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          London D. Meservy, Esq.
          MESERVY LAW, P.C.
          401 West A Street, Suite 1712
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (858) 779-1276
          Facsimile: (866) 231-8132
          E-mail: london@meservylawpc.com

               - and -

          Matthew D. Dente, Esq.
          DENTE LAW, P.C.
          600 B Street, Suite 1900
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 550-3475
          Facsimile: (619) 342-9668
          E-mail: matt@dentelaw.com

               - and -

          Justin A. Morello, Esq.
          ORELLO LAW, P.C.
          3170 Fourth Avenue, Suite 250
          San Diego, CA 92103
          Telephone: 619.277.4677
          Facsimile: 619.924.4268
          E-mail: justin@morellolawpc.com

CITRIX SYSTEMS: Conditional Cert. of FLSA Collective Action Sought
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as DANIELLE CIRILLO, on
behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. CITRIX
SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 5:21-cv-00088-BO (E.D.N.C.), the Plaintiff
asks the Court to enter an order:

   1. granting conditional certification of this action and for
      court-authorized notice pursuant to section 216(b) of the
      Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA);

   2. approving the proposed FLSA notice of this action and the
      consent form;

   3. directing a production of names, last known mailing
      addresses, last-known cell phone numbers, email addresses,
      work locations, and dates of employment of all putative
      plaintiffs within 15 days of the Order; and

   4. giving Plaintiff the ability to distribute the Notice and
      Opt-in  Form via first class mail, email, and text message as

      well as via radio and/or social media postings to:

      "all putative plaintiffs of the conditionally certified
      collective, with a reminder mailing to be sent 45-days after

      the initial mailing to all non-responding putative
      plaintiffs."

Citrix is an American multinational software company that provides
server, application and desktop virtualization, networking,
software as a service, and cloud computing technologies.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated April 2,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gilda A. Hernandez, Esq.
          Charlotte C. Smith, Esq.
          Robert W.T. Tucci, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICES OF GILDA A.
          HERNANDEZ, PLLC
          1020 Southhill Drive, Ste. 130
          Cary, NC 27513
          Telephone: (919) 741-8693
          Facsimile: (919) 869-1853
          E-mail: ghernandez@gildahernandezlaw.com
          csmith@gildahernandezlaw.com
          rtucci@gildahernandezlaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Frederick T. Smith, Esq.
          Louisa Johnson, Esq.
          SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
          121 W. Trade Street, Suite 2020
          Charlotte, NC 28202
          Telephone: (704) 925-6023
          E-mail: fsmith@seyfarth.com
                  lojohnson@seyfarth.com

DELAWARE COUNTY: Burford Suit Seeks to Certify Class
----------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as TONY BURFORD v. DELAWARE
COUNTY et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00577-JMY (E.D. Pa.), the Plaintiff
asks the Court to enter an order:

   1. certifying a class of:

      "All persons whose criminal case was dismissed or ended with
      a not guilty verdict or was nolle prossed in the Court of
      Common Pleas of Delaware County who posted cash bail and who

      had constable fees or live scan fees deducted from their bail

      refund;"

   2. appointing him as class representative; and

   3. appointing Alan Denenberg, Esq. and Stephen T. O'Hanlon, Esq.

      As class counsel.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated April 5,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3souUDo
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Alan E. Denenberg, Esq.
          1315 Walnut Street, 12th Floor
          Philadelphia, PA. 19107
          Telephone: (215) 546-1345

               - and -

          Stephen T. O'Hanlon, Esq.
          2 Penn Center, Suite 1410
          1500 John F. Kennedy Blvd.
          Philadelphia, PA 19102

ENBRIDGE INC: Robertson Files Suit in District of Colorado
----------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Enbridge (U.S.) Inc.
The case is styled as Zachariah Robertson, Angel Hernandez, Gordon
Lunsted, Greg Huggins, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Enbridge (U.S.) Inc., Cleveland Integrity
Services, Inc., Cypress Environmental Management-TIR, LLC,
Defendants; Avery Technical Resources, Inc., Interested Party; Case
No. 1:21-mc-00105-PAB (D. Colo., April 14, 2021).

The nature of suit is stated as Motion to Enforce Compliance with
Third-Party Subpoena.

Enbridge -- https://www.enbridge.com/ -- is North America's premier
energy infrastructure company.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          William R. Liles, Esq.
          JOSEPHSON DUNLAP LLP
          11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 3050
          Houston, TX 77046
          Phone: (713) 352-1100
          Fax: (713) 352-3300
          Email: wliles@mybackwages.com


EQT CORP: Certification of Class Action Sought in Securities Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit re EQT Corporation Securities
Litigation, Case No. 2:19-cv-00754-RJC (W.D. Pa.), the Plaintiffs
ask the Court for an order:

   1. certifying this case as a class action;

   2. appointing the Plaintiffs as Class Representatives under
      Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3); and

   3. appointing Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP
      and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC  as Class
      Counsel under Rule 23(g).

The Plaintiffs are the Court-appointed Lead Plaintiffs Government
of Guam Retirement Fund and the Northeast Carpenters Annuity Fund
and the Northeast Carpenters Pension Fund and additional
Plaintiff Cambridge Retirement System.

The Class consists of:

   "(i) all persons who purchased the common stock of EQT during
   the Class Period and were damaged thereby; (ii) all EQT
   shareholders who held EQT shares as of the record date of
   September 25, 2017 and were entitled to vote with respect to the

   Acquisition at the November 9, 2017 special meeting of EQT
   shareholders and were damaged thereby; (iii) all Rice
   shareholders who held Rice shares as of the record date of
   September 21, 2017 and were entitled to vote with respect to the

   Acquisition at the November 9, 2017 special meeting of Rice
   shareholders and were damaged thereby; and (iv) all persons who

   acquired the common stock of EQT in exchange for their shares of

   Rice common stock in connection with the Acquisition and were
   damaged thereby."

   Excluded from the Class are Defendants, directors and officers
   of EQT, and their families and affiliates.

EQT Corporation is an American energy company engaged in
hydrocarbon exploration and pipeline transport. It is headquartered
in EQT Plaza in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In the 2018 Forbes Global
2000, EQT was ranked as the 1426th-largest public company in the
world.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated April 2,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3wUUSBN
at no extra charge.[CC]

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class are:

          M. Janet Burkardt, Esq.
          Jocelyn P. Kramer, Esq.
          WEISS BURKARDT KRAMER LLC
          445 Fort Pitt Boulevard, Suite 503
          Pittsburgh, PA 15219
          Telephone: (412) 391-9890
          Facsimile: (412) 391-9685
          E-mail: jburkardt@wbklegal.com
                  jkramer@wbklegal.com

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class are:

          Steven J. Toll, Esq.
          S. Douglas Bunch, Esq.
          Susan G. Taylor, Esq.
          Megan K. Kistler, Esq.
          Christina D. Saler, Esq.
          COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS
          & TOLL PLLC
          1100 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 500
          Washington, D.C. 20005
          Telephone: (202) 408-4600
          Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
          E-mail: stoll@cohenmilstein.com
                  dbunch@cohenmilstein.com
                  sgtaylor@cohenmilstein.com
                  mkistler@cohenmilstein.com
                  csaler@cohenmilstein.com
                  bjackson@cohenmilstein.com
                  jekim@cohenmilstein.com

               - and -

          Salvatore J. Graziano, Esq.
          Adam H. Wierzbowski, Esq.
          Jai K. Chandrasekhar, Esq.
          Jesse L. Jensen, Esq.
          BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER
          & GROSSMANN LLP
          1251 Avenue of the Americas
          New York, NY 10020
          Telephone: (212) 554-1400
          Facsimile: (212) 554-1444
          E-mail: sgraziano@blbglaw.com
                  adam@blbglaw.com
                  jai@blbglaw.com
                  jesse.jensen@blbglaw.com

EXPERIAN INFORMATION: Benhayun Files FCRA Suit in E.D. New York
---------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Experian Information
Solutions, Inc., et al. The case is styled as Sami Benhayun,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Discover Bank, Case No.
2:21-cv-02020 (E.D.N.Y., April 14, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc. -- https://www.experian.com/
-- operates as an information services company. The Company offers
credit information, analytical tools, and marketing services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Uri Horowitz, Esq.
          HOROWITZ LAW, PLLC
          14441 70th Road
          Flushing, NY 11367
          Phone: (718) 705-8706
          Fax: (718) 705-8705
          Email: uri@horowitzlawpllc.com


FEDERAL EXPRESS: Fischer Appeals Ruling in FLSA Suit to 3rd Cir.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs Christa Fischer, et al., filed an appeal from a court
ruling entered in the lawsuit entitled CHRISTA B. FISCHER,
Plaintiff v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, Case
No. 5-19-cv-04924, in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

As reported in the Class Action Reporter on January 6, 2021, Judge
John M. Gallagher of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania granted Fischer's Motion for Conditional
Certification and Court-Authorized Notice, but only for the
putative opt-in Plaintiffs, who worked for FedEx Express in
Pennsylvania during the relevant period.

For the better part of the last decade, Fischer and Andre Saunders
worked as security specialists at their respective FedEx Ground
facility assignments in Pennsylvania and Maryland. Although they
are employed by FedEx Express, security specialists provide various
loss-prevention and site monitoring services at FedEx Ground
locations pursuant to a Professional Services Agreement.

Ms. Fischer and Mr. Saunders allege that, during their time as
security specialists, they regularly worked more than 40 hours a
week. However, because FedEx Express classified them as salaried
employees who were exempt from overtime pay requirements, they were
not paid for those extra hours worked. As a result, Ms. Fischer and
Mr. Saunders brought suit alleging that, by misclassifying security
specialists as exempt employees, FedEx Express failed to pay them
proper overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards
Act.

The Plaintiffs are now seeking an appeal under 28 U.S.C. Section
1292(b) from the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered by
Judge Gallagher dated December 23, 2020, granting in part a motion
for conditional certification for immediate interlocutory appeal
filed by Plaintiff Fischer.

Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(b), the certification of an order for
interlocutory appeal is appropriate when (1) the order involves a
controlling question of law; (2) a substantial ground for
difference of opinion concerning the ruling exists; and (3) an
immediate appeal would materially advance the litigation.

The appellate case is captioned as Christa Fischer, et al. v.
Federal Express Corp, et al., Case No. 21-1683, in the United
States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, filed on April 12,
2021.[BN]

Plaintiffs-Petitioners CHRISTA B. FISCHER and ANDREW SAUNDERS,
INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED EMPLOYEES,
are represented by:

          Kelly A. Burgy, Esq.
          Benjamin L. Davis, III, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF PETER T. NICHOLL
          36 South Charles Street
          Baltimore, MD 21201
          Telephone: (410) 244-7005
          E-mail: kaburgy@nicholllaw.com
                  bdavis@nicholllaw.com

               - and -

          Adam W. Hansen, Esq.
          Colin R. Reeves, Esq.
          APOLLO LAW
          333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 300
          Minneapolis, MN 55401
          Telephone: (612) 927-2969
          E-mail: adam@apollo-law.com
                  colin@apollo-law.com    

               - and -

          Scott M. Pollins, Esq.
          POLLINS LAW FIRM
          303 West Lancaster Avenue
          Wayne, PA 19087
          Telephone: (610) 896-9909
          E-mail: scott@pollinslaw.com   

Defendants-Respondents FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. and FEDEX GROUND
PACKAGE SYSTEM are represented by:

          Barak J. Babcock, Esq.
          Frederick L. Douglas, Esq.
          Brandon D. Pettes, Esq.
          FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
          3620 Hacks Cross Road
          Building B, Third Floor
          Memphis, TN 38125
          Telephone: (901) 434-8523
          E-mail: barak.babcock@fedex.com
                  frederick.douglas@fedex.com

FERNY PROPERTIES: Court Finds Tompkins Bid to Certify Class as Moot
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as Tompkins v. Ferny
Properties, LLC et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-00190 (D.N.D.), the Hon.
Judge Peter D. Welte entered an order:

   1. finding as moot motion to certify class; and

   2. finding as moot motion for hearing in light of the order
      granting unopposed Motion for preliminary approval of class
      and collective action settlement.

The suit alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Ferny Properties is located in Fargo, North Dakota and is part of
the Restaurants Industry.[CC]



GERBER PRODUCTS: McNealy Suit Transferred to District of New Jersey
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The case styled as LaKendrea Camille McNealy, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. Gerber Products Company,
Case No. 0:21-cv-00666, was transferred from the U.S. District
Court for the District of Minnesota to the U.S. District Court for
the District of New Jersey on April 13, 2021.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:21-cv-09064-CCC-MF to
the proceeding.

The nature of suit is stated as Other Fraud.

Gerber Products Company -- http://www.gerber.com/-- is an American
purveyor of baby food and baby products headquartered in Florham
Park, New Jersey, with plans to relocate to Arlington,
Virginia.[BN]


HEALTHCARE REVENUE: Santos Suit Seeks to Certify Class of Consumers
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as OMAR SANTOS and AMANDA
CLEMENTS on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
v. HEALTHCARE REVENUE RECOVERY GROUP, LLC d/b/a ARS ACCOUNT
RESOLUTION SERVICES and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Case
No. 1:19-cv-23084-KMW (S.D. Fla.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to
enter an order:

   1. certifying a nationwide class of:

      "2.1 million consumers whose credit reports containing
      inaccurate information were provided by Defendant Experian to

      third parties, in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act

      (FCRA);"

   2. appointing Plaintiffs as Class Representatives; and

   3. appointing Plaintiffs' counsel as Class Counsel.

For over a year and a half -- from March 2017 through September
2018 -- Experian systematically and intentionally erased critical
payment-history information on all accounts reported by a medical
debt collector, the Defendant Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group,
LLC d/b/a ARS Account Resolutions Services (ARS).

The automated deletion of this data caused the "Date of Status" --
an Experian-generated date that alerts third-parties to the date
the account entered its current status -- on all the ARS accounts
to erroneously display the current month, every month. Experian
included this inaccurate information not only in credit reports
sent to third parties, but also in other Experian products used by
financial institutions to monitor the creditworthiness of
consumers, the Plaintiffs say.

Healthcare Revenue provides collection services to health care
sector. Experian operates as an information services company.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion to certify class dated April 5,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3a8NkBO
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Peter Prieto, Esq.
          Matthew P. Weinshall, Esq.
          Alissa Del Riego, Esq.
          PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
          E-mail: pprieto@podhurst.com
                  mweinshall@podhurst.com
                  adelriego@podhurst.com

               - and -

          Roland Tellis, Esq.
          Jonas P. Mann, Esq.
          BARON & BUDD, P.C.
          15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600
          Encino, CA 91436
          E-mail: rtellis@baronbudd.com
                  jmann@barobudd.com

               - and -

          Dennis McCarty, Esq.
          Jonathan Raburn, Esq.
          McCARTY & RABURN PLLC
          2931 Ridge Road, Suite 101 No. 504
          Rockwall, TX 75032
          E-mail: dennismccartylaw@gmail.com
                  jonathan@geauxlaw.com


HEAT TREATING: Davis Gets Amended FLSA Collective Conditional Cert.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as WESLEY DAVIS v. KOWALSKI
HEAT TREATING CO., Case No. 1:20-cv-02137-JG (N.D. Ohio), the Hon.
Judge James S. Gwin entered an order:

   1. conditionally certifying an amended Fair Labor Standards Act
      (FLSA) collective of:

      "All current and former hourly, non-exempt production
      employees in Defendant’s salt bath division who worked 40
or
      more hours in any workweek and had one or more of the
      following occur: (1) the application of the Defendant's meal

      deduction; (2) the performance of pre-shift work; and/or (3)

      they earned a production bonus, during the three years
      preceding the filing of this Motion and continuing through
      the final disposition of this case ("Potential Opt-In
      Plaintiffs");"

   2. approving the Plaintiff's proposed Notice and Consent to Join

      forms once they are updated with the approved collective
      definition;

   3. directing the Plaintiff to propose an amendment to the Notice

      and Consent to Join forms within 14 days of this order only
      to address Plaintiff's concerns regarding the Defendant's
      payments to some employees;

   4. directing the Defendant to provide the Plaintiff with a
      roster of all potential opt-in plaintiffs, including their
      full names, their dates of employment, job titles, their last

      known home addresses, phone numbers, and their personal email

      addresses within 14 days of this Order; and

   5. directing the Notice and Consent to Join forms to be sent
      within 14 days of Plaintiff receiving the Defendant's
roster.

The Plaintiff alleges that his former employer’s practices
violated federal and state wage and hour protections. For example,
Plaintiff says that Defendant deducted thirty mealtime minutes
daily from employees' hours, even though employees did not always
take meal breaks. Likewise, the Plaintiff claims Defendant did not
pay employees for time spent on pre-shift duties. The Plaintiff
also alleges that the Defendant miscalculated discretionary bonuses
and
failed to pay overtime.

Kowalski provides metal heat treating services.

A copy of the Court's order dated April 2, 2020 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3mMFYc9 at no extra charge.[CC]

HERTZ CORPORATION: Viking Appeals Class Cert. Ruling in Denicolo
----------------------------------------------------------------
Defendant Viking Client Services, Inc. filed an appeal from a court
ruling entered in the lawsuit entitled RONALD G. DENICOLO, ET AL.,
v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION ET AL., Case No. 4:19-cv-00210-YGR, in the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California,
Oakland.

As reported in the Class Action Reporter on April 13, 2021, the
Hon. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers entered an order granting class
certification to:

   -- Illinois Resident Class

      "All Illinois residents who received, for the first time, a
      letter from Viking: (1) that asserted a claim of damage to a

      vehicle rented from Hertz, Dollar or 4 Thrifty; (2) more
than

      30 days after the date of the purported damage; and (3) the
      vehicle was not rented by or in the name of a business.

   -- California Rental Class

      "All individuals who rented a vehicle in California and who
      received, for the first time, a letter from Viking: (1) that

      asserted a claim of damage to a vehicle rented from Hertz,
      Dollar or Thrifty; (2) more than 30 days after the date of
      the purported damage; and (3) the vehicle was not rented by
      or in the name of a business;" and

   -- California Resident Class

      "All California residents who received a letter from Viking
      asserting a claim for purported damage to a vehicle rented
      from Hertz, Dollar or Thrifty; and (3) the vehicle was not
      rented by or in the name of a business."

The Court further Orders that: (a) plaintiff Ronald G. DeNicolo,
Jr. is appointed class representative of the Illinois Resident and
California Rental Classes; (b) plaintiff Michael G. Fox is
appointed class representative of the California Resident Class;
and (c) attorneys are Krislov & Associates, Ltd. and Andrus
Anderson LLP are appointed class counsel.

Plaintiff DeNicolo alleges four claims against Viking: violation of
the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. sections
1692f and 1692e; violation of the Illinois Vehicle Code, 625 ILCS
Section 5/6-305.2; and declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. Section
2201. Plaintiff Fox alleges four additional claims against Viking
for: violation of California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act, Cal. Code Section 17.1800; California's Unfair
Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Sections 17200, et seq.;
California Consumer Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code Sections 1750, et
seq.; and declaratory judgment.

Viking Client Services seeks a review of the Class Certification
Order entered by Judge Rogers.

The appellate case is captioned as Ronald Denicolo, Jr., et al. v.
Viking Client Services, Inc., Case No. 21-80036, in the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed on April 12,
2021.[BN]

Defendant-Petitioner VIKING CLIENT SERVICES, INC., DBA Viking
Billing Service, is represented by:

          James Kevin Schultz, Esq.
          SESSIONS, ISRAEL & SHARTLE, LLP
          1545 Hotel Circle South, Suite 150
          San Diego, CA 92108
          Telephone: (619) 758-1891
          E-mail: jschultz@sessions.legal

Plaintiffs-Respondents RONALD G. DENICOLO, Jr. and MICHAEL G. FOX,
on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, are
represented by:

          Jennie Lee Anderson, Esq.
          Lori Erin Andrus, Esq.
          ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP
          155 Montgomery Street
          San Francisco, CA 94104
          Telephone: (415) 986-1400
          E-mail: jennie@andrusanderson.com
                  lori@andrusanderson.com   
   
               - and -

          Clinton A. Krislov, Esq.
          KRISLOV LAW
          20 North Wacker Drive
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Telephone: (312) 606-0500
          E-mail: clint@krislovlaw.com

HUB INTERNATIONAL: Gonzalez Seeks to Certify Class of Employees
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as FABIAN GONZALEZ and LORI
SANCHEZ, individuals, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all
persons similarly situated, v. HUB INTERNATIONAL MIDWEST LIMITED, a
Corporation; HUB INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, a Corporation; and Does 1
through 10, Inclusive, Case No. 5:20-cv-02600-PA-AS (C.D. Calif.),
the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order:

   1. certifying classes of employees employed by the Defendant
      Hub International:

      a. The "Meal Period Class" defined as:

         "All non-exempt, hourly paid employees who worked for the
         Defendant in California at any time from January 8, 2015
         through the date of class certification, and who worked at

         least one shift of more than 6 hours."

      b. The "Rest Period Class" defined as follows:

         "All non-exempt, hourly paid employees who worked for the

         Defendant in California at any time from January 8, 2015
         through the date of class certification, who worked at
         least one shift of more than 3.5 hours."

      c. The "Wage Statement Class" defined as follows:

         "All non-exempt, hourly-paid employees who worked for the

         Defendant in California from January 8, 2018 through the
         date of class certification, who received at least one
         wage statement from the Defendant."

      d. The "Regular Rate Class" defined as follows:

         "All Class Members who worked overtime in a pay period in

         which ‘Employee Referral Bonus', ‘Management Bonus',
         ‘Bonus', ‘Reward Bones' and/or ‘Other Bonus' was
received
         and whose overtime regular rate of pay did not account for

         such bonuses from January 8, 2015 through the date of
         class certification."

   2. appointing Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik De Blouw LLP as
      class counsel; and

   3. approving the designation of the Plaintiff Fabian Gonzalez as

      class representative for classes (a) through (d), and
      Plaintiff Lori Sanchez as class representative for classes
      (a) through (c).

The Plaintiffs bring the first cause of action under Cal. Bus. &
Prof. Code for restitution for Defendant's unlawful and unfair
practices for failing to provide legally compliant meal periods
when meal periods taken by the Meal Period Class Members from
January 8, 2015 through the date of class certification.

The Plaintiff additionally brings the first cause of action under
the UCL for restitution for the Defendant's failure to provide off
duty rest periods to the Rest Break Class from 12 January 8, 2015
through the date of class certification. The Plaintiff additionally
brings the first cause of action under the UCL for restitution for
the Defendant's failure to properly compensate all Regular Rate
Class Members for overtime worked based on the Defendant's failure
to incorporate all non-discretionary incentive compensation in
Regular Rate Class Members rate of overtime compensation from
January 8, 2015 through the date of class certification.

HUB International is a leading North American insurance brokerage
that provides employee benefits, business, and personal insurance
products and services.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion to certify class dated April 5,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/2Q3RQL7
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Norman B. Blumenthal, Esq.
          Kyle R. Nordrehaug, Esq.
          Aparajit Bhowmik, Esq.
          Jeffrey S. Herman, Esq.
          BLUMENTHAL NORDREHAUG BHOWMIK DE BLOUW LLP
          2255 Calle Clara
          La Jolla, CA 92037
          Telephone: (858)551-1223
          Facsimile: (858) 551-1232

INTERNATIONAL TRAINING: Catalina Files Suit in Cal. Superior Court
------------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against International
Training & Exchange, Inc. The case is styled as Paula Catalina,
Correa Campos, Agatha Maher, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. International Training & Exchange,
Inc. d/b/a Aupaircare, Inc., a California Company, Case No.
CGC21590812 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., April 14, 2021).

The case type is stated as "OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS."

International Training & Exchange, Inc. --
http://www.intraxinc.com/-- is located in San Francisco,
California and is part of the Education & Training Services
Industry.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Matthew C. Helland, Esq.
          NICHOLS KASTER, LLP
          235 Montgomery Street, Suite 810
          San Francisco, CA 94104
          Phone: 415-277-7239
          Fax: 415-277-7238
          Email: helland@nka.com


KADMON HOLDINGS: Pomerantz Law Reminds of June 2 Deadline
---------------------------------------------------------
Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed
against Kadmon Holdings, Inc. and certain of its officers.  The
class action, filed in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of New York, and docketed under 21-cv-01797, is on
behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than
Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired  Kadmon securities
between October 1, 2020 and March 10, 2021, both dates inclusive
(the "Class Period"), seeking to recover damages caused by
Defendants' violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue
remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 promulgated
thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.

If you are a shareholder who purchased Kadmon securities during the
Class Period, you have until June 2, 2021 to ask the Court to
appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class.  A copy of the
Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com.   To discuss
this action, contact Robert S. Willoughby at newaction@pomlaw.com
or 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll-free, Ext. 7980. Those who
inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address,
telephone number, and the number of shares purchased.

Kadmon is a biopharmaceutical company that discovers, develops, and
commercializes small molecules and biologics primarily for the
treatment of inflammatory and fibrotic diseases.  The Company's
lead product candidates include, among others, belumosudil (KD025),
an orally administered selective inhibitor of the rho-associated
coiled-coil kinase 2 ("ROCK2"), which is in Phase II clinical
development for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease
("cGVHD").

On September 30, 2020, post-market, Kadmon announced the submission
of a New Drug Application ("NDA") for belumosudil for the treatment
of cGVHD (the "Belumosudil NDA") with the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration ("FDA").

Then, on November 30, 2020, Kadmon announced the FDA's acceptance
of the Belumosudil NDA, and that the FDA had assigned the NDA a
Prescription Drug User Fee Act ("PDUFA") target action date of May
30, 2021.

The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants
made materially false and misleading statements regarding the
Company's business, operations, and compliance policies.
Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements
and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Belumosudil NDA was
incomplete and/or deficient; (ii) the additional new data that the
Company submitted in support of the Belumosudil NDA in response to
an information request from the FDA materially altered the NDA
submission; (iii) accordingly, the initial Belumosudil NDA
submission lacked the degree of support that the Company had led
investors to believe; (iv) accordingly, the FDA was likely to
extend the PDUFA target action date to review the Belumosudil NDA;
and (v) as a result, the Company's public statements were
materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On March 10, 2021, Kadmon issued a press release "announc[ing] that
the [FDA] has extended the review period" for the Belumosudil NDA
and that, "[i]n a notice received from the FDA on March 9, 2021,
the Company was informed that the [PDUFA] goal date for its
Priority Review of belumosudil has been extended to August 30,
2021."  Kadmon advised investors that "[t]he FDA extended the PDUFA
date to allow time to review additional information submitted by
Kadmon in response to a recent FDA information request," and that
"[t]he submission of the additional information has been determined
by the FDA to constitute a major amendment to the NDA, resulting in
an extension of the PDUFA date by three months."

On this news, Kadmon's stock price fell $0.52 per share, or 10.57%,
to close at $4.40 per share on March 11, 2021.

The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles,
and Paris is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas
of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded
by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class
action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities
class actions. Today, more than 80 years later, the Pomerantz Firm
continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights
of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and
corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous
multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See
www.pomerantzlaw.com [GN]

KELLEY LAW: Francis-Luster Seeks to Notify Class of Paralegals
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as TRAMAINE FRANCIS-LUSTER
and TERENA HODGE on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, v. KELLEY LAW FIRM, P.C., Case No.
3:19-cv-02708-L (N.D. Tex.), the Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter
an order authorizing the case to proceed as a collective and
authorizing notice to potential plaintiffs of their right to opt-in
under Section 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29
U.S.C. or, in the alternative, for expedited discovery.

The Plaintiffs seek to notify potential Plaintiffs as follows:

   "All persons employed as a paralegal by Kelley Law Firm in its
   Dallas, Texas, office from August 2017 to the present."

The Defendant is a law firm handling wrongful death and personal
injury cases. Six to eight paralegals work there at any one time.
Turnover is high. Declaration of Tremaine Francis-Luster.

The Defendant's paralegals work long hours at the office and home,
during the day and evenings and on weekends. Paralegals were
expected to work 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekdays. Despite requiring
more than a 40 hour workweek, the Defendant does not pay paralegals
overtime, but a set salary, the Plaintifffs contend.

The Plaintiffs sued Defendant to recover overtime wages not paid as
required by the FLSA. Similarly situated individuals work as
paralegals at Defendant's Dallas office. These individuals, former
and current employees, should be notified of this action and their
right to participate, if they so desire to do so.

Plaintiff Francis-Luster worked for Defendant from August 2017 to
December 2018. Plaintiff Jones worked for Defendant from August
2017 to October 2017.

During their tenure, the Defendant failed to pay paralegals for the
hours worked over 40 in a workweek. Rather, as the Plaintiffs'
declarations show, the Defendant pays its paralegals as exempt,
salaried employees.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion dated April 2, 2020 is available
from PacerMonitor.com at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          N. Sue Allen, Esq.
          ALLEN LAW FIRM
          4701 Altamesa Blvd, Suite 2R
          Fort Worth, TX 76133
          Telephone: (817) 926-5005
          Facsimile: (817) 926-5165
          E-mail: sue@sueallenlaw.com

LINK SNACKS: Sosa Files ADA Suit in Southern District of New York
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Link Snacks, Inc. The
case is styled as Yony Sosa, on behalf of himself and all other
persons similarly situated v. Link Snacks, Inc., Case No.
1:21-cv-03224 (S.D.N.Y., April 13, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Link Snacks doing business as Jack Link's Beef Jerky --
https://www.jacklinks.com/ -- is an American snack company best
known as the producer and marketer of the eponymous brand of beef
jerky.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael A. LaBollita, Esq.
          GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
          150 E. 18 St., Suite PHR
          New York, NY 10003
          Phone: (212) 228-9795
          Email: michael@gottlieb.legal


MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL: Scoma Suit Seeks to Certify Two Classes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as SCOMA CHIROPRACTIC, P.A.,
WILLIAM P. GRESS, and FLORENCE MUSSAT M.D., S.C., individually and
on behalf of a Class, v. MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INC., Case No.
2:16-cv-00041-JLB-MRM (M.D. Fla.), the Plaintiffs submit the second
amended motion for class certification pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
23(a) and (b)(3).

The Plaintiffs seek to certify the following classes:

   -- Stand-Alone Fax Machine Class

      "All persons or entities who were successfully sent a
      facsimile on a stand-alone telephone facsimile machine on or

      about December 18–23, 2015, stating "Happy Holiday" and
      inviting recipients to apply for an "Exclusive Doctors Club
      World Elite MasterCard" credit card, where the fax either (a)

      contains no "opt-out notice" explaining how to stop future
      faxes; or (b) contains an opt-out notice stating: "Recipient

      may Opt Out of any future faxes by emailing a request to
      OptOut@TheDrClub.com or by calling 949.202.1777."

   -- Online Fax Service Class

      "All persons or entities who were successfully sent a
      facsimile via an "online fax service" on or about December
      18–23, 2015, stating "Happy Holiday" and inviting
recipients
      to apply for an "Exclusive Doctors Club World Elite
      MasterCard" credit card, where the fax either (a) contains no

      "opt-out notice" explaining how to stop future faxes; or (b)

      contains an opt-out notice stating: "Recipient may Opt Out of

      any future faxes by emailing a request to
      OptOut@TheDrClub.com or by calling 949.202.1777."

If the Court certifies the alternative classes, the Plaintiffs
request the Court appoint Scoma and Gress to represent the
Stand-Alone Fax Machine Class and Mussat to represent the Online
Fax Service Class.

The Plaintiffs also request that the Court appoint the law firms of
Anderson + Wanca ("A+W") and Edelman, Combs, Latturner & Goodwin
("ECLG"), and Curtis C. Warner as class counsel.

The case arises out of an advertising campaign in which facsimiles
promoting a "Doctors Club World Elite MasterCard" credit card were
successfully sent to Plaintiffs and hundreds of thousands of others
between December 18, 2015, and December 23, 2015.

The Plaintiffs, three healthcare providers, promptly filed separate
suits under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ("TCPA")
and later jointly filed the operative Third Amended Complaint
against Defendant, Mastercard International Inc.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated April 2,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3mLnhG7
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Daniel A. Edelman, Esq.
          Heather Kolbus, Esq.
          EDELMAN COMBS LATTURNER & GOODWIN
          20 S. Clark St., Suite 1500
          Chicago, IL 60603
          Telephone: (312) 739-4200
          E-mail: dedelman@edcombs.com

               - and -

          Curtis C. Warner, Esq.
          5 E. Market St., Suite 250
          Corning, NY 14830
          Telephone: (888) 551-8685
          E-mail: cwarner@warner.legal

               - and -

          Ryan M. Kelly, Esq.
          Ross M. Good, Esq.
          ANDERSON + WANCA
          3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500
          Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
          Telephone: (847) 368-1500
          E-mail: rkelly@andersonwanca.com
                  rgood@andersonwanca.com

MOBILE TELESYSTEMS: Salim Appeals Securities Suit Dismissal
-----------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff Shayan Salim filed an appeal from the District Court's
Memorandum Decision and Order dated March 1, 2021, and Judgment
dated March 2, 2021, entered in the lawsuit entitled SHAYAN SALIM,
Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff v. MOBILE TELESYSTEMS PJSC, ANDREI A. DUBOVSKOV, ALEXEY
V. KORNYA, and ANDREY KAMENSKY, Defendants, Case No. 19-cv-1589, in
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
(Brooklyn).

As reported in the Class Action Reporter on Mar. 31, 2021, the
District Court granted the motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's second
amended complaint (SAC) filed by Defendant MTS.

On March 19, 2019, the named Plaintiff brought the class action on
behalf of himself and all others similarly situated against Mobile
Telesystems PJSC ("MTS") and three executives--Andrei Dubovskov,
Alexey Kornya, and Andrey Kamensky. On April 6, 2020, the Plaintiff
filed the SAC.

MTS is a Moscow-based telecommunications company that provides
services in Russia, Ukraine, Turkmenistan and Armenia. From 2004 to
2012, MTS allegedly conspired to pay over $420 million in illegal
bribes for the benefit of an Uzbek government official, Gulnara
Karimova, so that it could operate in the Uzbek telecommunications
market. The company operated in Uzbekistan until 2012, when it
refused to continue meeting Karimova's bribery demands.

In the SAC, the Plaintiffs allege that between 2014 and 2019
("Class Period"), MTS issued false and misleading statements about
the company's potential liability for the bribery scheme, the
effectiveness of the company's internal controls and compliance
structure, and the company's cooperation with U.S. investigators.

According to the SAC, the Defendants' misstatements and omissions
artificially inflated MTS's stock price, causing the Plaintiffs to
suffer a loss after the company entered into a Deferred Prosecution
Agreement ("DPA") with the Department of Justice ("DOJ") in 2019.
The Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants violated Section 10(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78j(b), and
that Defendants Dubovskov, Kornya and Kamensky ("Individual
Defendants") violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C.
Section 78t(a).

The appellate case is captioned as Salim v. Mobile TeleSystems
PJSC, Case No. 21-839, in the United States Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit, filed on March 31, 2021.[BN]

Plaintiff-Appellant Shayan Salim, Individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, is represented by:

          Laurence Mathew Rosen, Esq.
          THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.
          275 Madison Avenue
          New York, NY 10016
          Telephone: (212) 686-1060
          E-mail: lrosen@rosenlegal.com

Defendant-Appellee Mobile TeleSystems PJSC is represented by:

          Andrew Brian Clubok, Esq.
          LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
          555 11th Street, NW
          Washington, DC 20004
          Telephone: (202) 637-2200
          E-mail: andrew.clubok@lw.com

NEW JERSEY: Court Certifies Class in J.M. Suit
----------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as J.M., S.C., A.N., P.T.,
J.L., R.H., "JOHN DOE", "ROBERT DOE", T.W., M.K., and E.A.
individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
HON. CATHY L. WALDOR, U.S.M.J., v. SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, M.D.,
M.B.A., Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Health, in his
official capacity, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-17303-CLW (D.N.J.), the
Hon. Judge Cathy L. Waldor entered an order granting class
certification and final approval of class settlment and awarding
attorneys' fees.

The Court further finds that given the social benefit of litigation
undertaken by Class Counsel, the extraordinary risk of non-payment
present under the circumstances, and the remarkable results
achieved by Class Counsel, an award of attorneys' fees to Class
Counsel is warranted; and as such the Court hereby awards Class
Counsel a total of $500,00.00 in attorneys' fees and costs in this
matter. That award is to be distributed in the amount of 25%
($125,000.00) to Class Counsel, DiSabato & Considine LLC, and 75%
($375,000.00) to former counsel/proposed intervenor, The Wolf Law
Firm LLC, in full and final resolution, satisfaction and release of
DiSabato & Considine LLC's and The Wolf Law Firm LLC's respective
claims to attorneys' fees and costs in this matter. The Defendants
are ordered to make payment within 30 days of the date.

The Defendants include CAROLE JOHNSON, Commissioner, New Jersey
Department of Human Services, in her official capacity; ELIZABETH
CONNOLLY, Acting Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Human
Services, in her official capacity; VALERIE L. MIELKE, M.S.W.,
Assistant Commissioner, New Jersey Division of Mental Health and
Addiction Services, as an individual and in her official capacity;
TOMIKA CARTER, CEO, Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, as an
individual and in her official capacity; TERESA A. McQUAIDE, Former
Acting CEO, Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, as an individual
and in her official capacity; ROBERT EILERS, M.D., Medical
Director, New Jersey Division of Mental Health and Addiction
Services, as an individual and in his official capacity; HARLAN M.
MELLK, M.D., Chief of Medicine, Greystone Park Psychiatric
Hospital, as an individual and in his official capacity; EVARISTO
O. AKERELE, M.D., Medical Director, Greystone Park Psychiatric
Hospital, as an individual and in his official capacity; LISA
CIASTON, ESQ., Legal Liaison, New Jersey Division of Mental Health
and Addiction Services, as an individual and in her official
capacity; SWANG S. OO, ESQ., Deputy Attorney General, State of New
Jersey, as an individual and in her official capacity; JAMES L.
FREY, Employee Relations Officer, Greystone Park Psychiatric
Hospital, as an individual and in his official capacity GURBIR
GREWAL, ESQ., Attorney General, State of New Jersey, in his
official capacity; and PHILIP D. MURPHY, M.B.A., Governor, State of
New Jersey, in his official capacity.

A copy of the Court's order dated April 5, 2020 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3uPJ7uI at no extra charge.[CC]

NORTHSTAR LOCATION: Klapperich Seeks to Certify FDCPA Class
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as SCOTT KLAPPERICH,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
NORTHSTAR LOCATION SERVICES LLC, Case No. 2:19-cv-01859-WED (E.D.
Wisc.), the Plaintiff asks the Court to enter an order determining
his lawsuit may proceed as a class action for his claims against
Northstar under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

The Plaintiff seeks to certify the following Class under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3):

   "All natural persons to whom Northstar Location Services LLC
   mailed a written communication to a Wisconsin address during the

   Class Period beginning on December 18, 2018 and ending on
   January 8, 2020."

He further requests the Court to appoint him to represent the
putative Class and that his attorneys, Thomasson PLLC and the Law
Office of Bill Clanton P.C., be appointed Class counsel.

According to the complaint, Northstar mailed Mr. Klapperich a
collection letter dated August 6, 2019, which sought to collect an
alleged debt. The 8/6/19 Letter is a form letter based on a
template, which Northstar uses to collect debts from Wisconsin
residents.

Mr. Klapperich's lawsuit alleges Northstar's IRS Warning is
materially false, deceptive, and misleading to unsophisticated
consumers because Discover bank was neither required to, nor would
it ever, file an IRS 1099C form when it writes off or forgives less
than $600 of a debt's principal amount. The lawsuit also alleges
Northstar's 8/6/19 Letter is materially false, deceptive, and
misleading because it failed to provide accurate information which
would permit any "tax advisor" to provide the unsophisticated
consumer -- or any other person -- with a professional opinion as
to the tax consequences from accepting the settlement offer.

The Northstar provides a full-service receivables debt collection
solution.

A copy of the Plaintiff's motion to certify class dated April 5,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/2QqFjky
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Andrew T. Thomasson, Esq.
          Katelyn B. Busby, Esq.
          THOMASSON PLLC
          3010 South Appleton Road
          Menasha, WI 54952
          Telephone: (973) 312-0774
          E-mail: Andrew@Thomassonpllc.com
                  Katelyn@Thomassonpllc.com

OKLAHOMA: Court Tosses Bid for Class Certification in Beard Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as ALLISON BEARD, et al., v.
SCOTT CROW, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Case No.
CIV-19-00310-JD (W.D. Okla.), the Hon. Judge Jodi W. Dishman
entered an order denying Plaintiffs' motion for class certification
because the Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate any of the
threshold requirements of Rule 23(a) and have failed altogether to
show that Rule 23(b) is satisfied.

The denied class is defined as "Individuals in the custody of the
Oklahoma Department of Corrections who were sentenced to a term of
imprisonment."

The Plaintiffs are twenty-three prisoners in the custody of the
Oklahoma Department of Corrections at North Fork Correctional
Center, Lawton Correctional Facility, Cimarron Correctional
Facility, Mabel Basset Correctional Center, James Crabtree
Correctional Center, Davis Correctional Facility, Dick Conner
Correctional Center, and Oklahoma State Penitentiary. The
Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint alleges that conditions of
overcrowding and understaffing in the ODOC subject Plaintiffs to a
substantial risk of violence in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

A copy of the Court's order dated April 5, 2020 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/2QmL5ns at no extra charge.[CC]

PARTNER COMMS: Facing Ancillary Service Related Suit
----------------------------------------------------
Partner Communications Company Ltd. said in its Form 20-F report
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25,
2021, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, that the company
is facing a putative class action suit related to ancillary
service.

On February 25, 2021, a claim and a motion to certify the claim as
a class action were filed against the Company.

The claim alleges, among others, that the Company provided its
customers with TV service for viewing through a free application,
as an ancillary benefit to other services and that the Company
began charging customers for the TV service upon the cancellation
of the ancillary service.

The total amount claimed against the Company was not stated by the
applicant (however the claim was estimated by the applicant to be
over NIS 2.5 million).

The claim is still in its preliminary stage of the motion to be
certified as a class action.

Partner Communications Company Ltd. is a leading Israeli provider
of telecommunications services (cellular, fixed-line telephony,
internet and television services). Partner's ADSs are quoted on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market(TM) and its shares are traded on the
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.


PARTNER COMMS: Facing CSC Operating Hours Related Suit
------------------------------------------------------
Partner Communications Company Ltd. said in its Form 20-F report
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25,
2021, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, that the company
is facing a putative class action suit related to its unlawful
reduction of the operating hours of its customer service centers
(CSC).  

On November 26, 2020, a claim and a motion to certify the claim as
a class action were filed against the Company and three of its
subsidiaries.

The claim alleges that the Company unlawfully reduced the operating
hours of its customer service centers.

The total amount claimed against the Company if the lawsuit is
recognized as a class action, was not stated by the applicants.

The claim is still in its preliminary stage of the motion to be
certified as a class action.

Partner Communications Company Ltd. is a leading Israeli provider
of telecommunications services (cellular, fixed-line telephony,
internet and television services). Partner's ADSs are quoted on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market(TM) and its shares are traded on the
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.


PARTNER COMMS: Facing Non-Disclosure of Interests Rates Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------------
Partner Communications Company Ltd. said in its Form 20-F report
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25,
2021, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, that the company
is facing a putative class action suit related to non-disclosure of
interest rates to customers purchasing items in credit
transaction.

On January 25, 2021, a claim and a motion to certify the claim as a
class action were filed against the Company.

The claim alleges that the Company does not disclose interest rates
to customers that purchase items in credit transactions prior to
the conclusion of the transaction.

The total amount claimed against the Company was not stated by the
applicant (however the claim was estimated by the applicant to be
over NIS 2.5 million).

The claim is still in its preliminary stage of the motion to be
certified as a class action.

Partner Communications Company Ltd. is a leading Israeli provider
of telecommunications services (cellular, fixed-line telephony,
internet and television services). Partner's ADSs are quoted on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market(TM) and its shares are traded on the
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.


PARTNER COMMS: Facing Spam Related Putative Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------
Partner Communications Company Ltd. said in its Form 20-F report
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25,
2021, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, that the company
is facing a putative class action suit related to an advertising
POP UP or spam.

On November 1, 2020, a claim and a motion to certify the claim as a
class action were filed against the Company.

The claim alleges that the Company unlawfully displays advertising
POP UP messages before and during TV services constitute spam.

The total amount claimed against the Company is estimated by the
applicants to be approximately NIS 175 million.

The claim is still in its preliminary stage of the motion to be
certified as a class action.

Partner Communications Company Ltd. is a leading Israeli provider
of telecommunications services (cellular, fixed-line telephony,
internet and television services). Partner's ADSs are quoted on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market(TM) and its shares are traded on the
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.


PARTNER COMMS: Facing Unlawful Anti-Virus/Spam Fee Charging Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
Partner Communications Company Ltd. said in its Form 20-F report
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25,
2021, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, that the company
is facing a putative class action suit related to fee for
anti-virus and/or anti-spam services for email boxes.

On December 15, 2020, a claim and a motion to certify the claim as
a class action were filed against the Company and 012 Smile Telecom
Ltd.

The claim alleges that the Company charged its customers a fee for
anti-virus and/or anti-spam services for email boxes while they did
not use these services and that the Company does not keep records
of their requests to receive these services.

The total amount claimed against the Company was not stated by the
applicant (however the claim was estimated by the applicant to be
over NIS 2.5 million).

The claim is still in its preliminary stage of the motion to be
certified as a class action.

Partner Communications Company Ltd. is a leading Israeli provider
of telecommunications services (cellular, fixed-line telephony,
internet and television services). Partner's ADSs are quoted on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market(TM) and its shares are traded on the
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.


QUALITY BLACKTOP: Second Cir. Appeal Filed in Hernandez FLSA Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Defendant Karline Hellerman filed an appeal from a court ruling
entered in the lawsuit entitled Santos Hernandez, Ferdis Delgado
and Manuel Campos, On behalf of themselves and others similarly
situated v. Quality Blacktop Services, Inc., Steven Hellerman
Driveway Corp., John Doe Prime Contractors 1 through 10, John Doe
Surety Company 1 Through 10, Karline Hellerman and Steven
Hellerman, in their individual capacity, Case No. 18-cv-4862, in
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter, the Plaintiffs
filed the case under the Fair Labor Standards Act alleging denial
of overtime compensation.

Ms. Hellerman seeks a review of the Court's Judgment dated March
31, 2021, wherein the Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment was
granted as to Defendants Quality Blacktop, Hellerman Driveways, and
Karline Hellerman; and that Plaintiffs were awarded a total amount
of $610,067.32 plus post-judgment interest; and the claims against
Defendants Steven Hellerman, John Doe Prime Contractors 1 through
10, and John Doe Surety Company 1 through 10 were dismissed.  

The appellate case is captioned as Hernandez v. Quality Blacktop
Services, Inc., Case No. 21-912, in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed on April 12, 2021.[BN]

Defendant-Appellant Karline Hellerman is represented by:

          Ralph E. Preite, Esq.
          KOUTSOUDAKIS & IAKOVOU LAW GROUP, PLLC
          90 Broad Street
          New York, NY 10004
          Telephone: (212) 386-7606

Plaintiffs-Appellees Santos Hernandez, Ferdis Delgado, and Manuel
Campos, On behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, are
represented by:

          Delvis Melendez, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF DELVIS MELENDEZ, P.C
          90 Bradley Street
          Brentwood, NY 11717
          Telephone: (631) 434-1443
          E-mail: delvisprlaw@aol.com

RECON OILFIELD: FLSA Collective Wins Conditional Certification
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as CORY MCDANIEL, on behalf
of himself and others similarly situated, v. RECON OILFIELD
SERVICES, INC., et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-04497-ALM-CMV (S.D. Ohio),
the Hon. Judge Algenon L. Marbley entered an order conditionally
certifying the following class:

   "All current and former hourly, non-exempt Ohio field employees
   of the Defendants  who were paid 40 or more work hours in any
   workweek from December 30, 2017 and continuing through the final

   disposition of this case."

In August 2020, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging, among other
things, violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, arising
from the Defendants' failure to pay overtime wages to its oilfield
operators, laborers, and roustabouts.

Recon is a full service pressure testing company.

A copy of the Court's order dated April 5, 2020 is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/2QmL5ns at no extra charge.[CC]

RUANE & CUNNIFF: Ferguson Suit Seeks to Certify Class Action
------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as MICHAEL L. FERGUSON, MYRL
C. JEFFCOAT and DEBORAH SMITH, Individually and as Representatives
of a Class of Similarly Situated Plan Participants and
Beneficiaries, and on behalf of the DST SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PROFIT
SHARING PLAN, v. RUANE CUNNIFF & GOLDFARB INC.; DST SYSTEMS, INC.;
THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE DST SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PROFIT
SHARING PLAN and THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF DST SYSTEMS, INC., the Plaintiffs ask the Court to
enter an order:

   1. certifying case as a class action on behalf of:

      "All participants and beneficiaries of the DST Systems, Inc.
      401(k) Profit Sharing Plan from March 14, 2010 through July
      31, 2016 (the "Class Period"), excluding the Defendants and
      all other individuals who are or have ever been a member of
      the Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(k) Profit

      Sharing Plan or the Compensation Committee of the Board of
      Directors of DST Systems, Inc. or otherwise served as
      fiduciaries of the DST Plan during the Class Period;"

   2. appointing themselves as representatives of the proposed
      class; and

   3. appointing their counsel as counsel for the Class and
      providing for notice to the Class.

The Plaintiffs originally moved for class certification on April
10, 2020. Since then, the Plaintiffs have reached proposed
settlements with the Defendants. The settlement agreements are
before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motions for Preliminary Approval of
Class Action Settlement and for Related Relief.

Ruane & Cunniff, based in New York City, is the investment firm
founded in 1969 by William J. Ruane, Richard T. Cunniff and Robert
Goldfarb.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' renewed motion to certify class dated
April 5, 2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at
1:17-cv-06685-ALC-BCM at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

Counsel for th Plaintiffs, the Plan and the Proposed Class are:

          Laurie Rubinow, Esq.
          James E. Miller, Esq.
          Laurie Rubinow, Esq.
          MILLER SHAH LLP
          65 Main Street
          Chester, CT 06412
          Telephone: (866) 540-5505
          Facsimile: (866) 300-7367
          E-mail: jemiller@millershah.com
                  lrubinow@millershah.com

               - and -

          Heidi A. Wendel, Esq.
          MILLER SHAH LLP
          52 Duane Street, 7th Floor
          New York, NY 10007
          Telephone: (866) 540-5505
          Facsimile: (866) 300-7367
          E-mail: hawendel@millershah.com

               - and -

          Nathan C. Zipperian, Esq.
          MILLER SHAH LLP
          1625 N. Commerce Parkway, Suite 320
          Fort Lauderdale, FL 33326
          Telephone: (866) 540-5505
          Facsimile: (866) 300-7367
          E-mail: nczipperian@millershah.com

              - and -

          Ronald S. Kravitz, Esq.
          Kolin C. Tang, Esq.
          MILLER SHAH LLP
          201 Filbert Street, Suite 201
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (866) 540-5505
          Facsimile: (866) 300-7367
          E-mail: rskravitz@millershah.com
                  kctang@millershah.com

               - and -

          James C. Shah, Esq.
          Alec J. Berin, Esq.
          MILLER SHAH LLP
          1845 Walnut Street, Suite 806
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Telephone: (866) 540-5505
          Facsimile: (866) 300-7367
          E-mail: jcshah@millershah.com
                  ajberin@millershah.com

               - and -

          Monique Olivier, Esq.
          OLIVIER SCHREIBER & CHAO LLP
          201 Filbert Street, Suite 201
          San Francisco, CA 94133
          Telephone: (415) 484-0980
          E-mail: monique@osclegal.com

SAN ANTONIO, TX: Payne Appeals Civil Rights Suit Ruling to 5th Cir.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs Don Albert Payne, et al., filed an appeal from a court
ruling entered in the lawsuit entitled Don Payne, et al. v. City of
San Antonio, Texas, et al., Case No. 5:19-CV-407, in the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio.

The Plaintiffs sued San Antonio Housing Authority (SAHA) and other
defendants, including but not limited to the City of San Antonio,
San Antonio Police Department, San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg, San
Antonio Police Chief William McManus, and San Antonio police
officers William Kasberg, Shannon Purkiss, and Gerardo Morales, and
Amy V. Carrillo for numerous alleged violations of 42 U.S.C.
Sections 1983–1986 and Texas state laws.

The Plaintiffs' Amended Petition alleges that they signed a lease
agreement with MidCrowne Pavilion Apartments and SAHA contractually
agreed to subsidize their rent under the Section 8 Program run by
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. According to
the Plaintiffs, they satisfied every payment obligation under the
lease, but were nonetheless evicted in retaliation for their
request for a reasonable accommodation for a disability. Plaintiffs
further allege that they were subject to an unlawful warrantless
search of their apartment and seizure of a firearm after management
of MidCrowne alerted SAHA to a post on Mr. Payne's Facebook page
that concerned firearms and ammunition.

The Plaintiffs' First Amended Petition asserts the following causes
of action against the various Defendants: (1) wrongful
eviction/unlawful search and seizure pursuant to Section 1983; (2)
due process violation pursuant to Section 1983; (3) disability
discrimination and failure to accommodate; (4) intentional
infliction of emotional distress; (5) civil conspiracy pursuant to
42 U.S.C. Section 1985; (6) violation of Section 1986; (7)
conspiracy to violate the Deceptive Trade Practices Act; and (8)
negligence.

The Plaintiffs seek a review of the Court's Order dated March 31,
2021, adopting in part/rejecting in part Report and
Recommendations, Motions terminated: denying without prejudice a
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Amy Carrillo,
granting a Motion for Summary Judgment Defendants' filed by Shannon
Purkiss, William Kasberg, Gerardo Morales, granting a Motion for
Summary Judgment filed by San Antonio Police Department, Ron
Nirenberg, William McManus, City of San Antonio, Texas, and
granting Defendant Amy V. Carrillo's Motion for Leave to File Out
of Time Response to Plaintiffs' Objections to the Report and
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed by Amy Carrillo.

The appellate case is captioned as Payne v. City of San Antonio,
Case No. 21-50292, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit, filed on April 12, 2021.[BN]

Plaintiffs-Appellants Don Albert Payne and Gloria Jean Payne,
Individually and on Behalf of all Other Persons Similarly Situated,
appear pro se.

Defendants-Appellees City of San Antonio, Texas, William Kasberg,
Shannon Purkiss, Gerardo Morales, Ron Nirenberg, William McManus,
Midcrown Pavilion Apartments, San Antonio Housing Authority, and
Amy Carrillo are represented by:

          William L. Lewis, Esq.
          CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
          100 W. Houston Street
          San Antonio, TX 78205-0000
          Telephone: (210) 207-6520
          E-mail: logan.lewis@sanantonio.gov

               - and -

          Nathan Mark Ralls, Esq.
          HOBLIT DARLING RALLS HERNANDEZ & HUDLOW, L.L.P.
          6243 IH-10, W.
          San Antonio, TX 78201
          Telephone: (210) 224-9991
          E-mail: mralls@hdr-law.com  

               - and -

          Robert David Fritsche, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF R. DAVID FRITSCHE
          921 Proton Road
          San Antonio, TX 78258-4203
          Telephone: (210) 227-2726
          E-mail: david@lawordf.com  

               - and -

          Stephen Taylor Dennis, Esq.
          CLARK HILL STRASBURGER
          2301 Broadway Street
          San Antonio, TX 78215-1157
          Telephone: (210) 250-6000
          E-mail: stephen.dennis@clarkhillstrasburger.com

               - and -

          Benjamin V. Lugg, Esq.
          THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO
          818 S. Flores
          San Antonio, TX 78204
          Telephone: (210) 477-6027   
          E-mail: benjamin_lugg@saha.org

SELECT MEDICAL: Arends Suit Seeks Circulation of Notice to Class
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as JILL ARENDS and ALEXANDRA
ARMSTRONG, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated
individuals, v. SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION; SELECT EMPLOYMENT
SERVICES, INC.; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No.
2:20-cv-11381-AB-AGR (C.D. Calif., Filed December 18, 2019), the
Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order granting their motion
for circulation of notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. section 216(b) and
issuing notice to potential opt-in plaintiffs as soon as
practicable.

The Plaintiffs' motion seeks the certification of the following
Fair Labor Stabdards Act (FLSA) Class:

"All nonexempt hourly paid employees employed by the Defendants
within the United States who worked off-the-clock as demonstrated
by the comparison between Defendants’ electronic medical record
systems and electronic timekeeping systems at any time during the
relevant time period alleged in Plaintiffs' Operative Complaint."

This is a wage-hour collective, class, and representative action
for unpaid wages pursuant to the FLSA and the California Labor
Code. On November 1, 2019, the Plaintiff Jill Arends submitted her
wage complaint to the California Labor and Workforce Development
Agency (LWDA) pursuant to the Private Attorney General Act (PAGA)
requirement, before filing this action against the Defendants in
the Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of
Alameda, on December 28, 2019. The Plaintiff amended her complaint
and added Alexandra Armstrong as a named-Plaintiff on February 27,
2020.

The Defendants maintained a common plan, policy and practice of
requiring, suffering, and permitting all putative class members to
work off-the-clock without pay in violation of the Fair Labor
Stabdards Act (FLSA) and California Labor Code. The factual
underpinnings of Plaintiffs' case involve the interplay between the
Defendants' employment policies that apply equally to the
Plaintiffs and all other similarly situated employees that they
seek to notify about this action.

The Plaintiffs contend that because of the Defendants' chronic
understaffing and cost saving mechanisms, the Plaintiffs allege
that they and other similarly situated employees were regularly
required, suffered, and permitted to work off-the-clock while not
logged into the Defendants' timekeeping system, resulting in a
failure to pay overtime wages for hours worked over 40 in a
workweek.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion to certify class dated April 2,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3wRCRob
at no extra charge.[CC]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Mark R. Thierman, Esq.
          Joshua D. Buck, Esq.
          Joshua R. Hendrickson, Esq.
          Leah L. Jones, Esq.
          THIERMAN BUCK LLP
          7287 Lakeside Drive
          Reno, NV 89511
          Telephone: (775) 284-1500
          Facsimile: (775) 703-5027
          E-mail: info@thiermanbuck.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Ndubisi A. Ezeolu, Esq.
          Edward W. Racek, Esq.
          TUCKER ELLIS
          515 South Flower Street
          Forty-Second Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Telephone: (213) 430-3400
          Facsimile: (213) 430-3409
          E-mail: Ndbuisi.ezeolu@tuckerellis.com
                  edward.racek@tuckerellis.com


SOKOLIN LLC: Sosa Files ADA Suit in Southern District of New York
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sokolin LLC. The case
is styled as Yony Sosa, on behalf of himself and sll other persons
similarly situated v. Sokolin LLC, Case No. 1:21-cv-03225
(S.D.N.Y., April 13, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Sokolin -- https://www.sokolin.com/ -- is an internationally
renowned luxury retailer specializing in fine wine from
long-established wine-producing regions as well as emerging
viticultural areas.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael A. LaBollita, Esq.
          GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
          150 E. 18 St., Suite PHR
          New York, NY 10003
          Phone: (212) 228-9795
          Email: michael@gottlieb.legal


SWEET SHOP: Sosa Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York
------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sweet Shop Candies,
Inc. The case is styled as Yony Sosa, on behalf of himself and sll
other persons similarly situated v. Sweet Shop Candies, Inc., Case
No. 1:21-cv-03226 (S.D.N.Y., April 13, 2021).

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Sweet Shop Candies, Inc. -- http://www.sweetshopusa.com/--
manufactures chocolate confectionery products. The Company offers
chocolate products such as caramels, brags, truffles, bars, praline
pops, and chocolate covered oreos.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael A. LaBollita, Esq.
          GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
          150 E. 18 St., Suite PHR
          New York, NY 10003
          Phone: (212) 228-9795
          Email: michael@gottlieb.legal


UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: Santiago Suit Seeks to Certify Class
---------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as AUGUSTINO SANTIAGO, LILLY
LEYVA, GUILLERMO CREAMER, and MARIA ACEITUNO, individually and as
representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries of
behalf of the University of Miami Retirement Savings Plan, v.
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI, Case No. 1:20-cv-21784-DPG (S.D. Fla.), the
Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order:

   "All participants and beneficiaries of the University of Miami
   Retirement and Savings Plan from May 1, 2014, through the date
   of judgment, excluding the Defendant or any participant who is
a
   fiduciary to the Plan, excluding those individuals serving or
   who have served in a fiduciary capacity to the Plan, and the
   members of their immediate families."

The Plaintiffs also move the Court to appoint each of them as
representatives of the class and to appoint their attorneys, Wenzel
Fenton Cabassa, P.A., McKay Law, LLC, and Justice for Justice, LLC,
as class counsel.

The Plan is a defined contribution, individual account, employee
pension benefit plan under 29 U.S.C. section 1002(2)(A) and section
1002(34). Each of the named Plaintiffs is a participant in the
Plan. The Plan is one of the largest defined contribution plans in
the United States based on asset size. The Plan holds nearly $1
billion in assets and had over 16,000 participants with account
balances as of year-end 2018.

The Defendant is a named fiduciary to the Plan with responsibility
and discretionary authority to control the Plan's operation,
management, and administration.

A copy of the Plaintiffs' motion to certify class dated April 5,
2020 is available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3mPYyjF
at no extra charge.[CC]

Attorneys for the Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class are:

          Brandon J. Hill, Esq.
          Luis A. Cabassa, P.A.
          WENZEL FENTON CABASSA, P.A.
          1110 N. Florida Ave., Suite 300
          Tampa, FL 33602
          Telephone: (813) 337-7992
          Facsimile: (813) 224-0431
          Facsimile: 813-229-8712
          E-mail: bhill@wfclaw.com
                  lcabassa@wfclaw.com
                  gnichols@wfclaw.com

               - and -

          Michael C. McKay, Esq.
          MCKAYLAW, LLC
          5635 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 170
          Scottsdale, Arizona 85250
          Telephone: (480) 681-7000
          E-mail: mckay@mckay.law

               - and -

          Chad A. Justice, Esq.
          JUSTICE FOR JUSTICE LLC
          1205 N. Franklin St., Suite 326
          Tampa, FL 33602
          Telephone: (813) 566-0550
          Facsimile: (813) 566-0770
          E-mail: chad@getjusticeforjustice.com

VBFS INC: Conditional Certification of Employee Collective Sought
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit captioned as FILI ABUNDIZ CARRANZA, on
his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, v. VBFS,
INC. d/b/a M & M MARKET DELI et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-02635-PAE-KHP
(S.D.N.Y.), the Hon. Judge Katharine H. Parker entered an order:

   1. granting in part and denying in part the Plaintiff's motion
      for conditional certification of Fair Labor Standards Act
      (FLSA) claims;

   2. conditionally certifying a collective of:

      "non-exempt and non-managerial employees who previously
      worked for the Defendants at M&M Market Deli, formerly
      located at 529 Broome Street, New York, New York from March
      28, 2017 through February 28, 2020"; and

   3. directing the parties to file a draft notice with the Court
      by no later than April 16, 2021.

The Court said, "The Plaintiff's affidavit satisfies the modest
showing that is required at the conditional certification stage.
The Plaintiff's assertions and the supporting materials submitted
sufficiently bolster Plaintiff's contentions that he and his fellow
employees were subjected to certain unlawful wage and hour
practices at the Defendants' workplace, as described above.
Moreover, the Defendants agree that Plaintiff has satisfied that
burden for the limited purpose of resolving the instant motion for
conditional certification. Plaintiff Carranza has submitted a sworn
affidavit in which he asserts that he personally spoke with certain
employees at M&M, overheard conversations about his coworker's
compensation, personally witnessed his coworkers coming to and
leaving work, and in one case, was erroneously given his coworker's
paycheck. As a result, Carranza learned that several employees at
M&M, including himself, worked more than 40 hours per week and were
compensated with a flat monthly wage that violated the minimum wage
and overtime provisions of the FLSA and the New York Labor Law
(NYLL).

The Plaintiff Carranza claims that Defendants violated the FLSA and
NYLL, by failing to (1) pay Plaintiff and other non-managerial
employees the statutory minimum wage and (2) pay Plaintiff and
other non-managerial employees for overtime hours worked.

A copy of the Court's opinion and order dated April 2, 2020 is
available from PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3dZJJal at no
extra charge.[CC]


                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Rousel Elaine T.
Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche A. Castillon, Julie Anne L.
Toledo, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2021. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***