CAR_Public/180507.mbx              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R


               Monday, May 7, 2018, Vol. 20, No. 91



                            Headlines


ABC CARPET: "DelaCruz" Suit Alleges ADA Violations
ADVANTECH MANUFACTURING: Meyer-Van Zeeland Sues Over Unpaid OT
AFLAC INCORPORATED: "Young" Suit Alleges ADA Violation
ALABAMA: Bid to Certify Phase II Class in "Braggs" Suit Denied
ALLIED INTERSTATE: Accused by "Pappone" Suit of Violating FDCPA

AMERICAN EAGLE: Seeks 3rd Cir. Review of Ruling in "Bedoya" Suit
ANZ GUAM: "Parker" Suit Alleges TILA Violations
AP INTERNATIONAL: "Flores" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
AT&T MOBILITY: Gorss Seeks to Certify Class of Fax Ad Receivers
BANCO SANTANDER: Sued by OK Firefighters Over Antitrust Violation

BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA: "Richards" Suit Alleges RESPA Violation
BOSWORTH PLACE: "Oliveria" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
CARETENDERS OF CLEVELAND: "Johnson" Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
CENTRAL PARK BOATHOUSE: "Ahmeti" Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
CHAMPION PETFOODS: Accused by "Loeb" of Misrepresenting Dog Foods

CIOX HEALTH: Certification of Two Classes Sought in "Rave" Suit
CONCORDE INVESTMENT: "Nielen-Thomas" Suit Removed to W.D. Wisc.
CREDIT SUISSE AG: "Eisenberg" Sues Over Devalued Notes
CROSSTOWN COURIER: Class of Couriers Certified in "Arpke" Suit
CROWN CORK: Sixth Circuit Appeal Filed in "Cannon" ERISA Suit

DELL INC: Stockholders Class Certified in Pontiac Retirees Suit
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: Bid to Certify Homeless Persons Class Filed
DOORDASH INC: Burger Antics Seeks to Certify Class of Restaurants
DOUBLE GREEN: Sued by Najera Over Unpaid Earned Wages Under FLSA
DR. MARTENS: Website not Blind-accessible, Says "Kiler" Suit

DRILL CUTTINGS: Gutierrez Seeks to Certify Class Under FLSA
DYNAMIC RECOVERY: Teifeld's Bid for Class Certification Stricken
EQUIFAX INFO: Melo Sues Over Inaccurate Consumer Report
EVENT SOURCE: Fails to Pay Overtime Under FLSA, "Rasch" Suit Says
FACEBOOK INC: Faces "O'Kelly" Suit for Not Protecting Users' Info

FACEBOOK INC: "Casey" Suit Alleges Exchange Act Violation
FIRST ADVANTAGE: Fourth Circuit Appeal Filed in "Grimm" Suit
GIGA WATT: "Balestra" Suit Alleges Securities Act Violations
GOLDSMITH & HULL: Karcauskas Seeks Prelim. Nod of $20K Settlement
GRITTEN WRECKER: "McCutcheon" Labor Suit to Recover Overtime Pay

HAIER US: Dooner Seeks Prelim. Approval of Class Settlement
HARVARD COLLECTION: "Barnes" Suit Alleges FDCPA Violation
HONEYWELL INT'L: UAW Retirees Win Partial Summary Judgment
ILLINOIS: Court Certifies LTC Medicaid Class in "Koss" Suit
IMPERIAL MARBLE: Olson Moves to Certify Class of Ex-Employees

LE SPORTSAC: "Fischler" Suit Alleges ADA Violation
LVNV FUNDING: Seeks Prelim. OK Class Settlement in "Elliott" Suit
MARRIOTT INT'L: Court Refuses to Certify Class in "Arias" Suit
MDL 2741: "Roosevelt" Suit Included in Roundup Liability MDL
MDL 2840: "Baker" Fraud Suit Transferred to S.D. Florida

MERCK & CO: Faces LEHB Suit Over Zetia(R) Antitrust Violations
MERCK & CO: Providence Files Suit Over Zetia Price Conspiracy
MILITARY SYSTEMS: "Mosley" Suit Seeks to Recover Overtime Wages
NATIONAL DOCUMENT: "Sadrarhami" Suit Alleges TCPA Violation
NEW JERSEY: Aruanno Appeals Ruling in "Alves" to 3rd Cir.

NORTHLAND GROUP: Santiago Obtains Final OK of Class Settlement
OCWEN LOAN: FCCPA Class and FDCPA Subclass Certified in "Belcher"
OGORGEOUS INC: Faces "Sullivan" Over Deaf-Inaccessible Web Site
OMNICELL INC: "Beard" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages
PERMANENTE MEDICAL: Wolf Seeks Prelim. OK of $2.9-Mil. Settlement

PRIME COMMUNICATIONS: Wins Bid to Amend Class in "Lorenzo" Suit
PROFESSIONAL PLACEMENT: Untershine Moves for Class Certification
RENO HOUSING: Ninth Circuit Appeal Filed in "Roces" Class Suit
SAFE HAVEN: Atilano Moves to Certify Class of Case Managers
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO: "Sluder" Suit Transferred to N.D. Ohio

SPACIOUS TECHNOLOGIES: Martinez Sues Over Blind-Unusable Web Site
ST. LOUIS RAMS: Seeks 8th Cir. Review of Ruling in "McAllister"
TITLE SOURCE: Class of Staff Appraisers Certified in "Swamy" Suit
TRANSAMERICA LIFE: Appeals "Feller" Suit Cert. Order to 9th Cir.
UNITED STATES: Court Certifies Classes in Guam Contractors Suit

UNIVERSAL TAX: Wins Summary Judgment in Suit Filed by D&B II
VISUAL COMPUTER: Sent Unsolicited SMS Ads, "Levin" Suit Says
WAL-MART STORES: Mislabels Glucosamine Supplements, Parker Claims
WALGREEN CO: Court Grants Class Cert. in Washtenaw Retirees Suit
WERNER ENTERPRISES: Eighth Circuit Appeal Filed in "Petrone" Suit

WILLIAMS PEST: "Adams" Suit Alleges FLSA Violations
WIPRO LTD: "Phillips" Suit Transferred to S.D. Tex.
WYANDOT COUNTY, OH: Mulvaine Seeks to Recover OT Pay for EMTs
ZOCDOC INC: "Alfano" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
ZODIAC US: Cuzick Seeks Final Approval of $952,000 Settlement





                            *********



ABC CARPET: "DelaCruz" Suit Alleges ADA Violations
--------------------------------------------------
Emanuel DelaCruz, on behalf of himself and other similarly
situated v. ABC Carpet of New Jersey LLC dba ABC Carpet & Home,
Case No. 1:18-cv-02508 (S.D. N.Y., March 20, 2018), is brought
against the Defendant for violations of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

Plaintiff brings this civil rights action against the Defendant
for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its
website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by
Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired people.

Plaintiff Emanuel DelaCruz is a resident of New York, New York.
Plaintiff is a blind, visually-impaired handicapped person and a
member of a protected class of individuals under the ADA.

Defendant, ABC Carpet of New Jersey dba ABC Carpet & Home is and
was, at all relevant times herein a Domestic Business Corporation
with its principal executive offices in New York. Defendant
operates ABC Carpet & Home retail furniture and home furnishings
stores as well as the ABC Carpet & Home website and advertises,
markets, distributes, and sells furniture and home furnishings in
the State of New York and throughout the United States. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq.
      Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq.
      GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
      150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR
      New York, NY 10003
      Tel: (212) 879-0240
      Fax: (212) 982-6284
      E-mail: danalgottlieb@aol.com
              nyjg@aol.com


ADVANTECH MANUFACTURING: Meyer-Van Zeeland Sues Over Unpaid OT
--------------------------------------------------------------
MARYBETH MEYER-VAN ZEELAND on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated v. ADVANTECH MANUFACTURING, INC., a Domestic
Corporation, Case No. 2:18-cv-00490-NJ (E.D. Wisc., March 28,
2018), seeks relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
and Wisconsin's Wage Payment and Collection Laws for alleged
unpaid overtime compensation, unpaid agreed upon wages,
liquidated damages, costs and attorneys' fees.

Advantech Manufacturing, Inc., is a New Berlin, Wisconsin
corporation with a principal place of business in New Berlin.
The Company manufactures and produces sieves and related
accessories.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          James A. Walcheske, Esq.
          Scott S. Luzi, Esq.
          David M. Potteiger, Esq.
          WALCHESKE & LUZI, LLC
          15850 W. Bluemound Rd., Suite 304
          Brookfield, WI 53005
          Telephone: (262) 780-1953
          Facsimile: (262) 565-6469
          E-mail: jwalcheske@walcheskeluzi.com
                  sluzi@walcheskeluzi.com
                  dpotteiger@walcheskeluzi.com


AFLAC INCORPORATED: "Young" Suit Alleges ADA Violation
------------------------------------------------------
Lawrence Young, on behalf of himself and others similarly
situated v. AFLAC Incorporated, AFLAC Asset Management LLC, and
American Family Life Assurance Company of New York, Case No.
1:18-cv-02531 (S.D. N.Y., March 21, 2018), is brought against the
Defendant for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Plaintiff brings this civil rights action against the Defendants
for their failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its
website to be fully accessible to and independently usable by
Plaintiff and other blind or visually-impaired people. Despite
Defendants having an accessible statement, their website is in
fact no accessible, says the complaint.

Plaintiff Lawrence Young is a resident of Bronx, New York.
Plaintiff is a blind, visually-impaired handicapped person and a
member of a protected class of individuals under the ADA.

Defendants operate numerous offices and agents operate nationwide
including in New York, New York. Defendants' website and physical
locations provide to the public important insurance related goods
and services. Defendants' website provide consumers with access
to an array of goods and services about locations/contact of
agents, different insurance policies, products, enrollment forms,
get quotes, benefit estimators, find agents, claim forms and
other important information.  [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Bradly G. Marks, Esq.
      THE MARKS LAW FIRM, PC
      175 Varick St. 3rd Floor
      New York, NY 10014
      Tel: (646) 770-3775
      Fax: (646) 867-2639
      E-mail: brad@markslawpc.com

          - and -

      Jeffrey M. Gottlieb, Esq.
      Dana L. Gottlieb, Esq.
      GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES
      150 East 18th Street, Suite PHR
      New York, NY 10003
      Tel: (212) 228-9795
      Fax: (212) 982-6284
      E-mail: nyjg@aol.com
              danalgottlieb@aol.com


ALABAMA: Bid to Certify Phase II Class in "Braggs" Suit Denied
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Myron H. Thompson entered an order in the lawsuit titled
EDWARD BRAGGS, et al. v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his official
capacity as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of
Corrections, et al., Case No. 2:14-cv-00601-MHT-GMB (M.D. Ala.),
denying without prejudice and with leave to renew the Plaintiffs'
motion to:

   -- certify class for Phase II;
   -- re-open discovery for Phase 2B; and
   -- certify class regarding dental claim.

The Defendants' motion for a temporary stay is denied.

These motions are granted: Plaintiffs' motion to amend and
Plaintiffs' motion to re-open discovery regarding dental claim.

Judge Thompson notes that an opinion will follow explaining the
bases for this ruling.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Knv8sREX


ALLIED INTERSTATE: Accused by "Pappone" Suit of Violating FDCPA
---------------------------------------------------------------
PATRICIA PAPPONE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated v. ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC; SYNCHRONY BANK; and JOHN DOES
1-25, Case No. 3:18-cv-05087-MAS-LHG (D.N.J., March 30, 2018),
arises from the Defendants' alleged violation of the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act, which prohibits debt collectors from
engaging in abusive, deceptive and unfair practices.

Allied has a business location in Albany, Ohio.  Allied is a
business that uses the mail, telephone, and facsimile and
regularly engages in business the principal purpose of which is
to attempt to collect debts alleged to be due another.

Synchrony Bank is located in Kettering, Ohio.  The Doe Defendants
are currently unknown.

Synchrony engaged Allied to collect the Plaintiff's financial
obligation to Synchrony.  Synchrony engaged Allied as a
collection agency.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Joseph K. Jones, Esq.
          375 Passaic Avenue
          Fairfield, NJ 07004
          Telephone: (973) 227-5900
          Facsimile: (973) 244-0019
          E-mail: jkj@legaljones.com


AMERICAN EAGLE: Seeks 3rd Cir. Review of Ruling in "Bedoya" Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
Defendant American Eagle Express Inc. filed an appeal from a
court ruling in the lawsuit styled Ever Bedoya, et al. v.
American Eagle Express Inc., Case No. 2-14-cv-02811, in the U.S.
District Court for the District of New Jersey.

As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter, the
Plaintiffs are delivery drivers.  The Defendant is a logistics
company that coordinates delivery services throughout several
states (including New Jersey).  The Defendant employs Plaintiffs
as independent contractors.  The Plaintiffs brought this putative
class action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act to
challenge their status as independent contractors; they contend
that, under New Jersey law, they are employees.

The appellate case is captioned as Ever Bedoya, et al. v.
American Eagle Express Inc., Case No. 18-1641, in the United
States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.[BN]

Plaintiffs-Appellees EVER BEDOYA, DIEGO GONZALES and MANUEL
DECASTRO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated, are represented by:

          Mark J. Gottesfeld, Esq.
          R. Andrew Santillo, Esq.
          WINEBRAKE & SANTILLO, LLC
          Twinning Office Center
          715 Twinning Road, Suite 211
          Dresher, PA 19025
          Telephone: (215) 884-2491
          E-mail: mgottesfeld@winebrakelaw.com
                  asantillo@winebrakelaw.com

Defendant-Appellant AMERICAN EAGLE EXPRESS INC. is represented
by:

          Gregory T. Alvarez, Esq.
          Joseph C. DeBlasio, Esq.
          JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
          220 Headquarters Plaza
          East Tower, 7th Floor
          Morristown, NJ 07960
          Telephone: (973) 538-6890
          E-mail: AlvarezG@jacksonlewis.com
                  Joseph.DeBlasio@jacksonlewis.com


ANZ GUAM: "Parker" Suit Alleges TILA Violations
-----------------------------------------------
Ronald Parker, Fa'Afetai Parker, and Tualagi Gaoteote, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly situated v. ANZ Guam,
Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-00010 (D. Guam., March 21, 2018), is
brought against the Defendant for violations of the Truth in
Lending Act of 1968, alleging the bank violated federal law when
it didn't provide plaintiffs with important information in bank
documents, including description of late fees, information about
past payments or amounts due on loans.

The Parkers are residents of American Samoa, with their principal
residence in the Village of Amaluia, on a portion of land known
as Gatai.  Ronald Parker, a retired United States Air Force
veteran, and his wife Faafetai Parker, have lived in American
Samoa for many years. The Parkers' promissory note on their Gatai
property was originated in 2005 by Defendant in the amount of
$120,000.

Plaintiff Gaoteote, a retired United States Army veteran, has
been a resident of American Samoa for many years, living with his
wife and family in his principal residence in the Village of
Afono, on a portion of land known as Silaete.  Gaoteote's
promissory note and mortgage on this property were also
originated by Defendant in 2010 in the amount of $72,000.

Defendant ANZ is a bank incorporated in Guam and is an FDIC
insured institution that operates its America Samoan branches
under the registered name "ANZ Amerika Samoa Bank." ANZ, together
with its affiliates, services more than 5,000 mortgage loans.
[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

      Peter C. Perez, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF PETER C. PEREZ
      Suite 802, DNA Building
      238 Archbishop Flores St.
      Hagatna, GU 96910
      Tel: (671) 475-5055
      Fax: (671) 477-5447


AP INTERNATIONAL: "Flores" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
----------------------------------------------------------------
Xiomara Ortiz Flores and Edison Mejia, individually and on behalf
of all similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs, V. AP
International, Inc., Defendant, Case No. 18-cv-00806 (S.D. Tex.,
March 15, 2018), seeks to recover unpaid overtime compensation,
liquidated damages, and attorney's fees owed under the Fair Labor
Standards Act of 1938.

Flores worked for Defendant as a cashier from December of 2016
until February of 2018 while Mejia worked as a butcher from July
of 2014 until February 13, 2018. Plaintiffs regularly worked in
excess of 40 hours per week without overtime and were not paid
the required minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, says the complaint.
[BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Josef F. Buenker, Esq.
      Vijay A. Pattisapu, Esq.
      THE BUENKER LAW FIRM
      2030 North Loop West, Suite 120
      Houston, TX 77018
      Tel: (713) 868-3388
      Fax: (713) 683-9940
      Email: jbuenker@buenkerlaw.com
             vijay@buenkerlaw.com


AT&T MOBILITY: Gorss Seeks to Certify Class of Fax Ad Receivers
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit titled GORSS MOTELS, INC.,
individually and as the representatives of a class of similarly-
situated persons v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC and AT&T MOBILITY NATIONAL
ACCOUNTS LLC, Case No. 3:17-cv-00403-JBA (D. Conn.), seeks an
order from the Court certifying this class:

     All persons or entities who were successfully sent a
     facsimile on or about January 14, 2014, stating: "Visit your
     AT&T Premier online store at
     att.com/wireless/wyndhamfranchisees for your exclusive
     specials such as $50 new smartphone activation credit, $100
     instant rebate on all tablets while supplies last, 16% on
     qualifying monthly charges," and "Learn about AT&T's new
     Mobile Share Value Plan!," and "For a limited time, switch
     from T-Mobile and receive up to $450 when you trade in your
     current smartphone!."

The case arises out of the Defendants' fax broadcast advertising
the availability and quality of AT&T's products and services.
The broadcast, conducted on January 13, 2014, resulted in a
single fax being successfully sent to 3,886 fax numbers.

The Plaintiff also seeks an order from the Court appointing it as
class representative and appointing Ryan M. Kelly, Esq., of
Anderson + Wanca and Aytan Y. Bellin, Esq., of Bellin &
Associates as class counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=9459L84s

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ryan M. Kelly, Esq.
          ANDERSON + WANCA
          3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500
          Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
          Telephone: (847) 368-1500
          Facsimile: (847) 368-1501
          E-mail: bwanca@andersonwanca.com
                  rkelly@andersonwanca.com

               - and -

          Aytan Y. Bellin, Esq.
          BELLIN & ASSOCIATES LLC
          85 Miles Avenue
          White Plaines, NY 10606
          Telephone: (914) 358-5345
          Facsimile: (212) 571-0284
          E-mail: Aytan.Bellin@bellinlaw.com


BANCO SANTANDER: Sued by OK Firefighters Over Antitrust Violation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM and ELECTRICAL
WORKERS PENSION FUND LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., on behalf of themselves
and all other similarly situated v. BANCO SANTANDER S.A.,
SANTANDER INVESTMENT SECURITIES, INC., SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA,
INC. BANCO SANTANDER (MEXICO) S.A. INSTITUCION DE BANCA MULTIPLE,
GRUPO FINANCIERO SANTANDER MEXICO, SANTANDER INVESTMENT BOLSA,
SOCIEDAD DE VALORES, S.A.U., BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA,
S.A., BBVA SECURITIES, INC., BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC., BBVA
BANCOMER S.A., INSTITUCION DE BANCA MULTIPLE, GRUPO FINANCIERO
BBVA BANCOMER, GRUPO FINANCIERO BBVA BANCOMER, S.A. DE C.V.,
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, J.P. MORGAN BROKER-DEALER HOLDINGS
INC., BANCO J.P. MORGAN, S.A. INSTITUCION DE BANCA MULTIPLE, J.P.
MORGAN GRUPO FINANCIERO, HSBC HOLDINGS PLC, HSBC BANK PLC, HSBC
SECURITIES (USA) INC., HSBC MARKETS (USA) INC., HSBC MEXICO,
S.A., INSTITUCION DE BANCA MULTIPLE, GRUPO FINANCIERO HSBC, HSBC
NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC., HSBC LATIN AMERICA HOLDINGS (UK)
LIMITED, BARCLAYS PLC, BARCLAYS CAPITAL PLC, BARCLAYS CAPITAL
INC., BARCLAYS BANK PLC, GRUPO FINANCIERO BARCLAYS MEXICO, S.A.
DE C.V., BARCLAYS BANK MEXICO, S.A., CITIGROUP INC., CITIGROUP
GLOBAL MARKETS INC., CITIGROUP FINANCIAL PRODUCTS INC., CITIGROUP
GLOBAL MARKETS HOLDINGS INC., BANCO NACIONAL DE MEXICO, S.A.,
INSTITUCION DE BANCA MULTIPLE, GRUPO FINANCIERO BANAMEX, BANK OF
AMERICA N.A., BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANKAMERICA
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA MEXICO,
S.A., INSTITUCION DE BANCA MULTIPLE, GRUPO FINANCIERO BANK OF
AMERICA, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED,
DEUTSCHE BANK AG, DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES, INC., DEUTSCHE BANK
AMERICAS HOLDING CORP., DEUTSCHE BANK MEXICO, S.A. INSTITUCION DE
BANCA MULTIPLE, and "JOHN DOES" 1-10, Case No. 1:18-cv-02830
(S.D.N.Y., March 30, 2018), alleges violations of the Sherman
Antitrust Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act.

A Mexican government bond ("MGB") is a debt security (like a U.S.
Treasury bond) that is issued by the Mexican government during
regularly scheduled auctions.  The Mexican government uses MGBs
to raise capital, fund budget deficits, and control Mexico's
monetary supply.

The Defendants are horizontal competitors in the MGB market.
They are also the exclusive Mexican government-approved market
makers for MGBs.  The Defendants' U.S. Dealer-Subsidiaries sold
MGBs in the United States as agents for their Corporate Parents.

The Plaintiffs allege that this privilege allowed the Defendants
to dominate the MGB market.  In exchange for market maker status,
the Bank of Mexico ("Banxico") requires Defendants to
collectively bid for at least 100% of the MGBs offered in each
auction.  The Defendants, thus, control the supply of MGBs in the
over-the-counter market, where they sell the bonds purchased at
auction to their customers, the Plaintiffs assert.

The Defendants used this dominant position as the exclusive
government approved market markets in the MGB market to
unlawfully increase the profitability of their MGB businesses,
the Plaintiffs argue.  The Plaintiffs add that the Defendants'
agreement to restrain trade in the MGB market is part of a
broader pattern of collusion and price-fixing by these same
Defendants during the Class Period.

Banco Santander S.A. is a public banking group with its global
headquarters in Santander, Spain.  Banco Santander S.A. owns and
operates a New York Branch, which is the same legal entity and an
operational extension of Banco Santander S.A. in the United
States.  Santander Holdings USA, Inc., is a direct, wholly-owned
subsidiary of Banco Santander S.A. and is the corporate parent of
Santander Investment Securities, Inc.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Vincent Briganti, Esq.
          Christian Levis, Esq.
          Roland R. St. Louis, III, Esq.
          LOWEY DANNENBERG P.C.
          44 South Broadway
          White Plains, NY 10601
          Telephone: (914) 997-0500
          Facsimile: (914) 997-0035
          E-mail: vbriganti@lowey.com
                  clevis@lowey.com
                  rstlouis@lowey.com

               - and -

          Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr., Esq.
          Todd Seaver, Esq.
          BERMAN TABACCO
          44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
          San Francisco, CA 94104
          Telephone: (415) 433-3200
          Facsimile: (415) 433-6382
          E-mail: jtabacco@bermantabacco.com
                  tseaver@bermantabacco.com

               - and -

          Patrick T. Egan, Esq.
          BERMAN TABACCO
          One Liberty Square
          Boston, MA 02109
          Telephone: (617) 542-8300
          Facsimile: (617)542-1194
          E-mail: pegan@bermantabacco.com


BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA: "Richards" Suit Alleges RESPA Violation
------------------------------------------------------------
Daryl Richards et al., on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated v. Bank of Nova Scotia, Case No. 1:18-cv-00008
(D. V.I., March 20, 2018), is brought against the Defendant for
violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

This is a class action on behalf of Virgin Islands homeowners who
have mortgages with the Bank of Nova Scotia and force-placed
insurance coverage on their properties. Scotiabank allowed its
master force-placed insurance policy to lapse in August 2017, but
did not inform its borrowers. Instead, it continued to collect
force-placed insurance premiums from its borrowers even though
there was no insurance coverage. When the borrowers made claims
under the force-placed policy after Hurricanes Irma and Maria
struck the Virgin Islands in September 2017, Scotiabank falsely
informed the borrowers it would forward their claims to the
insurer even though it knew there was no coverage, says the
complaint.

Plaintiffs are residents of the Virgin Islands and have mortgage
with Nova Scotia.

Defendant Scotiabank is a Canadian corporation with its principal
place of business in Toronto, Ontario. Scotiabank does business
throughout the Virgin Islands. Scotiabank issues and services
residential home mortgages on St. Croix, St. Thomas and St. John.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Vincent Colianni, II, Esq.
      Vincent A. Colianni, Esq.
      COLIANNI & COLIANNI LLC
      1138 King Street
      Christiansted, VI 00820
      Tel: (340) 719-1766
      Fax: (340) 719-1770
      E-mail: mailbox@colianni.com


BOSWORTH PLACE: "Oliveria" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
----------------------------------------------------------------
William Oliveria, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Bosworth Place, Inc. dba Beantown Pub, and Roger W.
Zeghibe, Case No. 1:18-cv-10544 (D. Mass., March 21, 2018), seeks
to recover unpaid overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Plaintiff Cheryl Adams is a resident of Chandler, Texas.
Plaintiff was employed as a scheduling coordinator for
Defendants. Plaintiff William Oliveria is an adult resident of
Malden, Massachusetts. Plaintiff worked for Defendants as a cook
from in or around May 2007 until in or around February 2018.

Defendants own and operate Beantown Pub, a Massachusetts
corporation, with a principal place of business at 100 Tremont
Street, Boston, Massachusetts.  [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Stephen S. Churchill, Esq.
      FAIR WORK, P.C.
      192 South Street, Suite 450
      Boston, MA 02111
      Tel: (617) 607-6230
      E-mail: steve@fairworklaw.com


CARETENDERS OF CLEVELAND: "Johnson" Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
---------------------------------------------------------------
Shamica Johnson, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Caretenders of Cleveland, Inc. dba Almost
Family Medlink, Case 1:18-cv-00659 (N.D. Ohio, March 21, 2018),
is brought against the Defendant for violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Plaintiff Shamica Johnson performed home health care duties for
Defendant.

Defendant provides personal care services in several locations,
including Kentucky, Florida, Ohio and Connecticut.  [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Stephan I. Voudris, Esq.
      Christopher M. Sams, Esq.
      VOUDRIS LAW LLC
      8401 Chagrin Road, Suite 8
      Chagrin Falls, OH 44023
      Tel: (440) 543-0670
      Fax: (440) 543-0721
      E-mail: svoudris@voudrislaw.com
              csams@voudrislaw.com


CENTRAL PARK BOATHOUSE: "Ahmeti" Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
------------------------------------------------------------
Enkel Ahmeti, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Central Park Boathouse, LLC, and Dean Poll, Case No.
1:18-cv-02567 (S.D. N.Y., March 22, 2018), is brought against the
Defendants for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Plaintiff Enkel Ahmeti worked as a server at Central Park
Boathouse from early 2011 until late 2015.

The Defendants own and operate the Central Boathouse Restaurant
in Manhattan.  [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      D. Maimon Kirschenbaum, Esq.
      JOSEPH & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP
      32 Broadway, Suite 601
      New York, NY 10004
      Tel: (212) 688-5640
      Fax: (212) 688-2548


CHAMPION PETFOODS: Accused by "Loeb" of Misrepresenting Dog Foods
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Kellie Loeb, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Champion Petfoods USA Inc. and Champion Petfoods LP,
Case No. 2:18-cv-00494-NJ (E.D. Wisc., March 28, 2018), alleges
that contrary to the Defendants' representations, their dog food
products contain excessive levels of harmful heavy metals,
including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

As a result of Champion's misrepresentations, the Plaintiff and
other putative Class members were harmed by paying for the
advertised Products and receiving only an inferior and
contaminated product, the Plaintiff contends.

Champion Petfoods USA Inc. is incorporated in Delaware and is
headquartered in Auburn, Kentucky.  Champion Petfoods LP is a
Canadian limited partnership with its headquarters and principal
place of business located in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.  Champion
Petfoods LP owns, operates, and controls Champion Petfoods USA
Inc.

Champion sells a variety of premium-priced dog foods throughout
the United States.  Champion formulates, develops, manufactures,
markets, and distributes the dry dog food products under the
brand names "Orijen" and "Acana" throughout the United
States.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ben Barnow, Esq.
          Erich P. Schork, Esq.
          BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES, P.C.
          One North LaSalle Street, Suite 4600
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 621-2000
          Facsimile: (312) 641-5504
          E-mail: b.barnow@barnowlaw.com
                  e.schork@barnowlaw.com

               - and -

          Shpetim Ademi, Esq.
          John D. Blythin, Esq.
          Mark A. Eldridge, Esq.
          ADEMI & O'REILLY, LLP
          3620 East Layton Avenue
          Cudahy, WI 53110
          Telephone: (414) 482-8000
          Facsimile: (414) 482-8001
          E-mail: sademi@ademilaw.com
                  jblythin@ademilaw.com
                  meldridge@ademilaw.com


CIOX HEALTH: Certification of Two Classes Sought in "Rave" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned Timothy Rave v. Ciox
Health, LLC, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-00305-PP (E.D. Wisc.), asks
the Court to certify two classes under Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Mr. Rave contends the proposed classes cover persons, who have
been illegally charged various basic, retrieval and certification
fees in violation of Wisconsin law, citing Moya v. Aurora
Healthcare, Inc., 2017 WI 45, Par 22, 375 Wis. 2d 38, 894 N.W.2d
405 (2017).

The proposed classes meet all of the requirements of Rule 23
necessary to certify classes that will allow class members to
recover the fees that the Defendants illegally charged and
collected from them and be granted other relief they may be
entitled to under Wisconsin law, Mr. Rave argues.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=RHoMkleb

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Robert J. Welcenbach, Esq.
          WELCENBACH LAW OFFICES, S.C.
          933 North Mayfair Road, Suite 311
          Milwaukee, WI 53226
          Telephone: (414) 774-7330
          Facsimile: (414) 774-7670
          E-mail: robert@welcenbachlaw.com

               - and -

          J. Craig Jones, Esq.
          JONES AND HILL, LLC
          131 Highway 165 South
          Oakdale, LA 71463
          Telephone: (318) 335-1333
          Facsimile: (318) 335-1934
          E-mail: craig@joneshilllaw.com

               - and -

          Scott C. Borison, Esq.
          LEGG LAW FIRM, LLP
          38 S. Paca St. #116, Suite B
          Baltimore, MD 21201
          Telephone: (301) 620-1016
          Facsimile: (301) 620-1018
          E-mail: borison@legglaw.com


CONCORDE INVESTMENT: "Nielen-Thomas" Suit Removed to W.D. Wisc.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Defendants Fortune Financial Services, Inc., and TD Ameritrade,
Inc., removed on March 30, 2018, the lawsuit styled SUSAN NIELEN-
THOMAS, On behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v.
CONCORDE INVESTMENT SERVICES, LLC; FORTUNE FINANCIAL SERVICES,
INC.; TD AMERITRADE, INC.; WISCONSIN RIVER BANK; JEFFREY L.
BUTLER; and WISCONSIN INVESTMENT SERVICES LLC, Case No. 2018-CV-
000320, from the Circuit Court for Dane County, Wisconsin, to the
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:18-cv-00229 to the
proceeding.

On February 5, 2018, Susan Nielen-Thomas filed a putative class
action complaint in the State Court.  In the Complaint, the
Plaintiff invokes statutory, contractual, and tort-based claims
in connection with securities transactions executed in her
brokerage account.[BN]

Plaintiff Susan Nielen-Thomas is represented by:

          Michael H. Schaalman, Esq.
          Patrick T. O'Neill, Esq.
          HALLING & CAYO, S.C.
          320 E. Buffalo Street, Suite 700
          Milwaukee, WI 53202
          Wisconsin River Bank
          608 Phillips Blvd.
          Sauk City, WI 53583-0636
          Telephone: (414) 271-3400
          Facsimile: (414) 271-3841
          E-mail: mhs@hallingcayo.com
                  pto@hallingcayo.com

Defendant Fortune Financial Services, Inc., is represented by:

          Andrew Erlandson, Esq.
          Peyton Engel, Esq.
          HURLEY, BURISH & STANTON S.C.
          33 East Main Street, Suite 400
          Madison, WI 53703
          Telephone: (608) 257-0945
          E-mail: aerlandson@hbslawfirm.com
                  pengel@hbslawfirm.com

               - and -

          Karl E. May, Esq.
          KADISH, HINKEL & WEIBEL
          1360 East Ninth Street, Suite 400
          Cleveland, OH 44114
          Telephone: (216) 696-3030
          E-mail: kmay@khwlaw.com

Defendant TD Ameritrade, Inc., is represented by:

          Dana Sirkis Gloor, Esq.
          Megan B. Burnett, Esq.
          MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C.
          100 Light Street
          Baltimore, MD 21202
          Telephone: (410) 727-6464
          E-mail: dgloor@milesstockbridge.com
                  mburnett@milesstockbridge.com

               - and -

          Donald Daugherty, Esq.
          Erin M. Cook, Esq.
          GODFREY KAHN, S.C.
          833 East Michigan Street, Suite 1800
          Milwaukee, WI 53202-5615
          Telephone: (410) 287-9512
          E-mail: ddaugherty@gklaw.com
                  mcook@gklaw.com

Defendant Concorde Investment Services, LLC, is represented by:

          Brandon S. Reif, Esq.
          REIF LAW GROUP, P.C.
          10250 Constellation Boulevard, Suite 100
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310) 494-6500
          E-mail: breif@reiflawgroup.com


CREDIT SUISSE AG: "Eisenberg" Sues Over Devalued Notes
------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Eisenberg, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiffs, v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Index and
Calculation Services LLC, Defendants, Case No. 18-cv-02319 (S.D.
N.Y., March 15, 2018), seeks to recover minimum wage
compensation, liquidated damages, prejudgment and post-judgment
interest and attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Eisenberg purchased VelocityShares Inverse VIX Short Term
Exchange Traded Notes issued, offered, and sold by Credit Suisse
AG. The Notes are senior unsecured debt obligations of Credit
Suisse. Defendants' registration statement misrepresented the
updating and accuracy of the Notes' intraday indicative value
based on the relevant index real time calculation of the relevant
index applying the real time prices of the relevant futures
contracts, thus technically causing the prices incorrectly
inflated, says the complaint.

Shortly after the truth was disclosed, said notes lost most of
their value. The next day, on February 6, 2018, Credit Suisse
announced that it is invoking the early redemption clause in the
Registration Statement to terminate the notes on February 21,
2018.

Credit Suisse provides investment services worldwide. It is
headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland, and transacts substantial
business in New York out of offices at 11 Madison Avenue, New
York, New York.

Janus Index & Calculation Services LLC is headquartered in
Connecticut and transacts business in this District. JIC served
as Credit Suisse's agent for computing and disseminating the
Notes' "Intraday Indicative Value." [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Ariana J. Tadler, Esq.
      Robert A. Wallner, Esq.
      Andrei V. Rado, Esq.
      MILBERG LLP
      One Pennsylvania Plaza
      New York, NY 10119
      Tel: (212) 594-5300
      Email: atadler@milberg.com
             rwallner@milberg.com
             arado@milberg.com

             - and -

      William M. Aron, Esq.
      15 West Carrillo Street
      Santa Barbara, CA 93101
      Telephone: (805) 618-1768
      Facsimile: (805) 618-1580
      E-mail: bill@aronlawfirm.com

              - and -

      Eric H. Gibbs, Esq.
      GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
      505 14th Street, Suite 1110
      Oakland, CA 94612
      Telephone: (510) 350-9700
      Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
      Email: jak@classlawgroup.com


CROSSTOWN COURIER: Class of Couriers Certified in "Arpke" Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Travis R. McDonough grants the Plaintiff's motion for
conditional certification, for approval and distribution of
notice, and for disclosure of contact information in the lawsuit
styled STEVEN ARPKE, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. CROSSTOWN COURIER, INC., Case No. 1:17-cv-
00185-TRM-CHS (E.D. Tenn.).

The Plaintiff defines the class as:

     Each individual who (a) performed courier or delivery
     services for Crosstown Courier, Inc. ("Crosstown"), any time
     since June 29, 2014, (b) performed courier or delivery
     services pursuant to an assigned or designated route, (c)
     never subcontracted any of his or her delivery work for
     Crosstown or otherwise hired anyone to perform part or all
     of his or her work, (d) worked exclusively for Crosstown
     during his or her tenure, (e) contracted directly with
     Crosstown as an individual, and (f) performed his or her
     regular delivery work for Crosstown for more than forty
     hours per week in at least one work week.

Mr. Arpke filed the instant action on June 29, 2017, alleging
that the Defendant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by
misclassifying him and the other couriers as independent
contractors and by failing to pay them overtime wages.

Judge McDonough also orders the Defendant to disclose the names,
last known addresses, and last known e-mail addresses for all
putative class members within 14 days from the date of this
Order.  The Court further orders the Plaintiff to effectuate
notice in a manner consistent with this Order.  Finally, a
telephonic status conference was scheduled to discuss a trial
date and associated deadlines.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Izi3jhIW


CROWN CORK: Sixth Circuit Appeal Filed in "Cannon" ERISA Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff Vernon Cannon filed an appeal from a court ruling in
the lawsuit styled Vernon Cannon v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.,
Case No. 3:17-cv-00003, in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Ohio at Toledo.

The lawsuit alleges violations of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act.

The appellate case is captioned as Vernon Cannon v. Crown Cork &
Seal Co., Inc., Case No. 18-3280, in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

The briefing schedule in the Appellate Case is set as follows:

   -- Appellant brief is due on May 9, 2018; and
   -- Appellee brief is due on June 8, 2018.[BN]

Plaintiff-Appellant VERNON CANNON, individually and as class
action representative on behalf of all other Plaintiffs similarly
situated, is represented by:

          Michael D. Portnoy, Esq.
          MICHAEL D. PORTNOY ATTORNEY AT LAW
          1070 Commerce Drive, Suite 205
          Perrysburg, OH 43551
          Telephone: (419) 874-2775
          Facsimile: (419) 874-2777
          E-mail: hawkport@aol.com

Defendant-Appellee CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC., is
represented by:

          Dustin M. Dow, Esq.
          BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
          127 Public Square, Suite 2000
          Cleveland, OH 44114
          Telephone: (216) 861-7098
          E-mail: ddow@bakerlaw.com


DELL INC: Stockholders Class Certified in Pontiac Retirees Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Lee Yeakel grants the Lead Plaintiff's Motion for Class
Certification and Appointment of Class Representative and Class
Counsel in the lawsuit titled CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
SIMILARLY SITUATED v. DELL INC.; MICHAEL S. DELL; BRIAN T.
GLADDEN; AND STEPHEN J. FELICE, Case No. 1:15-cv-00374-LY (W.D.
Tex.).

The action shall proceed as a certified class action under Rule
23(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure consisting of:

     All persons and entities who bought or acquired Dell common
     stock between February 22,2012 and May 22,2012, inclusive,
     and who were damaged thereby. Excluded from the Class are
     Defendants, the officers and directors of the Company at all
     relevant times; members of their immediate families and
     their legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns;
     and any entity in which defendants have or had a controlling
     interest.

The lawsuit is a securities-fraud action brought on behalf of
purchasers of Dell Inc. securities between February 22, 2012, and
May 22, 2012, against Dell and certain of its past and present
officers for allegedly violating the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R.
240.10b-5.

Lead Plaintiff City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement
System is appointed a Class Representative.  Robbins Geller
Rudman & Dowd LLP is appointed as class counsel for the class.  A
Conference after Class Certification is set for May 18, 2018, at
2:00 p.m.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=kphiSwdJ


DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: Bid to Certify Homeless Persons Class Filed
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit captioned SHANEL PROCTOR, 1st St.
and K St. NE, Washington, D.C., 20002, and CHARLAINE BRAXTON, 1st
St. and L St. NE, Washington, D.C., 20002, on behalf of
themselves and others similarly situated v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA;
MURIEL BOWSER, Mayor of the District of Columbia, in her official
capacity, 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20004, Case
No. 1:18-cv-00701-TNM (D.D.C.), moves for provisional
certification of this class:

     all homeless persons who reside in public spaces that are
     subject to District, rather than federal, government
     oversight and have been or will be subject to encampment
     clearings pursuant to the [District of Columbia Protocol for
     the Disposition of Property Found on Public Space and
     Outreach to Displaced Persons].

Shanel Proctor and Charlaine Braxton have filed this class action
to allegedly end the District of Columbia's practice of
destroying the unattended personal belongings of homeless
individuals during encampment clearings.  The Plaintiffs contend
that that practice violates the Fourth Amendment of the United
States Constitution.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to designate their counsel as
class counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=h4kKm2XL

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Sarah L. Wilson, Esq.
          Ross A. Demain, Esq.
          Jon-Michael Dougherty, Esq.
          Victor D. Ban, Esq.
          COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
          One CityCenter
          850 Tenth St., N.W.
          Washington, DC 20001-4956
          Telephone: (202) 662-6000
          E-mail: swilson@cov.com
                  rdemain@cov.com
                  jdougherty@cov.com
                  vban@cov.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Karl A. Racine, Esq.
          ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
          441 4th Street, NW
          Washington, DC 20001
          Telephone: (202) 727-3400
          E-mail: karl.racine@dc.gov


DOORDASH INC: Burger Antics Seeks to Certify Class of Restaurants
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit styled BURGER ANTICS, INC., SUSHI
PARA ILL and SUSHI PARA NEW YORK, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated v. DOORDASH, INC., a Delaware
Corporation, Case No. 1:18-cv-00133 (N.D. Ill.), move the Court
to enter an order certifying a class consisting of:

     All restaurants in the United States whose restaurant name,
     Logo and/or Mark appear on the Defendants' website or, whose
     restaurant, when Googled, displays the Defendant as its
     delivery service and who have not entered into any agreement
     with Defendant to provide such delivery services during the
     relevant statute of limitations period.

The Plaintiffs allege that DoorDash advertises on its website
that it provides delivery services for the Plaintiffs' food and
it provides a link to the Plaintiffs' menus.  If a consumer
Googles the Plaintiffs' names, the consumer is directed to
DoorDash's website as the delivery service for their restaurant.

The Plaintiffs contend that they have never entered into an
agreement or arrangement of any kind with the Defendant that
would permit it to deliver their food with their blessing and
approval.  The Plaintiffs assert that the Defendant's
unauthorized use of their Marks and unauthorized sale of their
food has caused damage to their brand and good will.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=EkHox52B

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Terrence Buehler, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICE OF TERRENCE BUEHLER
          20 North Clark Street, Suite 800
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 371-4385
          E-mail: tbuehler@tbuehlerlaw.com


DOUBLE GREEN: Sued by Najera Over Unpaid Earned Wages Under FLSA
----------------------------------------------------------------
EDGARDO NAJERA, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly
Situated v. DOUBLE GREEN PRODUCE, INC., SAM CHIEN, JOHN CARI,
JOYCE YANG and JAIME TAPIA, Case No. 1:18-cv-01881 (E.D.N.Y.,
March 28, 2018), accuses the Defendants of violating the wage and
hour provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act by depriving the
Plaintiff and all similarly situated employees of their lawful
earned wages.

Double Green is a domestic business corporation whose principal
place of business is located in Brooklyn, New York.  The
Individual Defendants own, manage and oversee the Company's
operations.

The Defendants are involved in the wholesale distribution of
various food items, including vegetables and fruits.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Amit Kumar, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM CAFARO
          108 West 39th Street, Suite 602
          New York, NY 10018
          Telephone: (212) 583-7400
          E-mail: akumar@cafaroesq.com


DR. MARTENS: Website not Blind-accessible, Says "Kiler" Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
Marion Kiler, Individually and as the representative of a class
of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Martens Airwair
USA, LLC, Defendants, Case No. 18-cv-01601 (E.D. N.Y., March 15,
2018), seeks preliminary and permanent injunction, compensatory,
statutory and punitive damages and fines, prejudgment and post-
judgment interest, costs and expenses of this action together
with reasonable attorneys' and expert fees and such other and
further relief under the Americans With Disabilities Act, New
York State Human Rights Law and New York City Human Rights Law.

Defendant owns and operate Dr. Martens Stores in New York State
and provides shoes, boots, and accessories. It also provides a
website, www.drmartens.com which allows the ability to view their
products, make purchases, learn about promotions and information
about the Stores locations. Kiler browsed and intended to make an
online purchase. Plaintiff is legally blind and claims that
Defendant's website cannot be accessed by the visually-impaired.
[BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Dan Shaked, Esq.
      SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.
      44 Court St., Suite 1217
      Brooklyn, NY 11201
      Tel. (917) 373-9128
      E-mail: ShakedLawGroup@Gmail.com


DRILL CUTTINGS: Gutierrez Seeks to Certify Class Under FLSA
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit titled JOSEPH GUTIERREZ, KYLE LYNN,
and RYAN STEPHENS, each individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. DRILL CUTTINGS DISPOSAL COMPANY, L.L.C.;
THE REDDOCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.; JEFFREY REDDOCH, Sr.;
JEFFREY REDDOCH, Jr.; CHIQUITA REDDOCH; ALLISON REDDOCH REAUX;
LEAH M. REDDOCH O'MEARA; JEREMIAH M. REDDOCH; and SEAN M.
REDDOCH, Case No. 5:18-cv-00257-XR (W.D. Tex.), moves for class
certification pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Plaintiffs also ask that the certification schedule
accommodate follow-up telephone calls by Class Counsel to those
Putative Class Members who are former employees or whose contact
information, during the course of the class certification
schedule, is shown to be incorrect or no longer valid.

In their complaint, the Plaintiffs allege that DCDC failed to pay
its oilfield employees overtime wages required under federal law.
The Plaintiffs contend that DCDC and its co-Defendants instead
maintained a uniform pay practice of paying these employees a day
rate without any overtime compensation.

The Plaintiffs seek to allow their coworkers -- other oilfield
employees paid a day rate -- who performed similar job duties and
received similar pay, to receive notice of this collective
action.  The Plaintiffs assert their evidence meets and surpasses
the Fifth Circuit's lenient standard for conditional
certification, and the Court should certify this collective
action and order notice to class members.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=0HjVyBd6

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Richard J. (Rex) Burch, Esq.
          Matthew S. Parmet, Esq.
          BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC
          8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1500
          Houston, TX 77046
          Telephone: (713) 877-8788
          Telecopier: (713) 877-8065
          E-mail: rburch@brucknerburch.com
                  mparmet@brucknerburch.com


DYNAMIC RECOVERY: Teifeld's Bid for Class Certification Stricken
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois made a docket entry on March 29, 2018, in the case
entitled Judith L. Teifeld v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC, et
al., Case No. 1:17-cv-04072 (N.D. Ill.), relating to a hearing
held before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman.

The minute entry states that:

   -- there being no objection from either party, the Plaintiff's
      motion for class certification is stricken with leave to
      refile; and

   -- the Defendant is not to make a tender or an offer to settle
      this case on an individual basis or to serve an Offer of
      Judgment that contemplates an individual recovery.

A copy of the Notification of Docket Entry is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=PmdYaSai


EQUIFAX INFO: Melo Sues Over Inaccurate Consumer Report
-------------------------------------------------------
Ernest Melo, in behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, v. Equifax, Inc. and Equifax Information Services LLC
and Trans Union, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 17-cv-04822, (E.D. Va.,
March 15, 2018), seeks to recover actual and statutory damages,
equitable relief, restitution, reimbursement of out-of-pocket
losses, other compensatory damages resulting from negligence and
in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Plaintiff discovered that his credit file provided by Equifax and
Trans Union contained numerous inaccuracies including derogatory
and mismatched sets of credit information that severely reduced
his credit scores and were mixed into his file due to
deficiencies in the Defendants' data matching algorithms.

Defendants are engaged in the business of assembling, evaluating,
and dispersing information concerning consumers for the purpose
of furnishing consumer reports to third parties upon request.
[BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Leonard A. Bennett, Esq.
      CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, P.C.
      763 J. Clyde Morris Blvd., Ste. 1-A
      Newport News, VA 23601
      Telephone: (757) 930-3660
      Facsimile: (757) 930-3662
      Email: lenbennett@clalegal.com

             - and -

      Matthew J. Erausquin, Esq.
      CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, P.C.
      1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600
      Alexandria, VA 22314
      Tel: (703) 273-7770
      Fax: (888) 892-3512
      Email: matt@clalegal.com


EVENT SOURCE: Fails to Pay Overtime Under FLSA, "Rasch" Suit Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MEGAN RASCH, Individually, and on behalf of all those similarly
situated v. EVENT SOURCE LOGISTICS LLC and J.B.K. GROUP, INC.,
Case No. 1:18-cv-00731-JG (N.D. Ohio, March 30, 2018), accuses
the Defendants of failing to pay the Plaintiff and others for all
of the time they worked, including overtime wages, as required
under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the Ohio Minimum Fair
Wage Standards Act, the Ohio Untimely Payment of Wages Act, the
Ohio Prompt Pay Act, and the Ohio Constitution.

Event Source Logistics LLC was a family-owned Ohio Domestic
Limited Liability Company, owned and operated by John Bibbo, Jr.,
Kevin Bibbo, John Bibbo, Sr., and Susan Bibbo, and Defendant
J.B.K. Group, Inc.  Event Source was a for-profit Ohio
corporation.  J.B.K. Group, Inc., was registered with the Ohio
Secretary of State as an Ohio Corporation for profit.

The Defendants maintain offices in Cleveland, Ohio, as well as in
Columbus, Ohio; Detroit, Michigan; Pittsburgh Pennsylvania;
Pompano Beach Florida; and West Palm Beach Florida.  The
Defendants were in the business of renting equipment to customers
to stage 'Special Events,' using products Defendants purchase
and/or custom-make.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Caryn M. Groedel, Esq.
          Matthew Grimsley, Esq.
          CARYN GROEDEL & ASSOCIATES CO., LPA
          31340 Solon Road, Suite 27
          Cleveland, OH 44139
          Telephone: (440) 544-1122
          Facsimile: (440) 996-0064
          E-mail: cgroedel@groedel-law.com
                  mgrimsley@groedel-law.com


FACEBOOK INC: Faces "O'Kelly" Suit for Not Protecting Users' Info
-----------------------------------------------------------------
HOWARD O'KELLY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. FACEBOOK, INC.; and CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA, LLC, Case
No. 3:18-cv-01915 (N.D. Cal., March 28, 2018), seeks redress for
Facebook's alleged failure to protect and safeguard the private
information of nearly 50 million of its users, allowing that
information to be pilfered by Cambridge Analytica in an attempt
to manipulate Facebook users for political ends.

Facebook is incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in Menlo
Park, California.  Facebook operates a social networking Web site
that allows people to communicate with their family, friends, and
coworkers.  Facebook develops technologies that facilitate the
sharing of information, photographs, website links, and videos.

Cambridge Analytica LLC is a Delaware limited liability company
with offices in London, New York, and Washington, DC.  Cambridge
Analytica is a political consulting firm.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jason S. Hartley, Esq.
          STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP
          550 West C Street, Suite 1750
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 400-5822
          Facsimile: (619) 400-5832
          E-mail: hartley@stuevesiegel.com

               - and -

          Norman E. Siegel, Esq.
          Barrett J. Vahle, Esq.
          STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP
          460 Nichols Road, Suite 200
          Kansas City, MO 64112
          Telephone: (816) 714-7100
          Facsimile: (816) 714-7101
          E-mail: siegel@stuevesiegel.com
                  vahle@stuevesiegel.com


FACEBOOK INC: "Casey" Suit Alleges Exchange Act Violation
---------------------------------------------------------
Robert Casey, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Facebook, Inc., Mark E. Zuckerberg, and David M.
Wehner, Case No. 5:18-cv-01780 (N.D. Calif., March 22, 2018), is
brought against the Defendants for violation of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

This is a securities class action on behalf of all purchasers of
Facebook common stock between February 3, 2017 and March 19,
2018, inclusive (the "Class Period").

The Plaintiff Robert Casey purchased Facebook common stock during
the Class Period and suffered damages as a result of federal
securities law violations and false and/or misleading statements
and/or material omissions, says the complaint.

Facebook operates a social networking website that allows people
to communicate with their family, friends, and coworkers.
Facebook develops technologies that facilitate the sharing of
information, photographs, website links, and videos.  Facebook
users have the ability to share and restrict information based on
their own specific criteria.  By the end of 2017, Facebook had
more than 2.1 billion monthly active users.  Founded in 2004, the
Company is headquartered in Menlo Park, California.  The
Company's common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the ticker symbol "FB."

The Defendant Zuckerberg is the Company's Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board of Directors.

The Defendant David M. Wehner is the Company's Chief Financial
Officer. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      John T. Jasnoch, Esq.
      SCOTT+SCOTT ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP
      600 W. Broadway, Suite 3300
      San Diego, CA 92101
      Tel: (619) 233-4565
      Fax: (619) 233-0508
      E-mail: jjasnoch@scott-scott.com

          - and -

      Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF ALFRED G. YATES, JR., P.C.
      300 Mt. Lebanon Boulevard, Suite 206-B
      Pittsburgh, PA 15234-1507
      Tel: (412) 391-5164
      Fax: (412) 471-1033
      E-mail: yateslaw@aol.com


FIRST ADVANTAGE: Fourth Circuit Appeal Filed in "Grimm" Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
Virginia Barton Grimm filed an appeal from a court ruling in the
lawsuit styled Virginia Grimm v. First Advantage Background
Services Corp. and The Board of Trustees of the Community College
of Baltimore County, Case No. 1:17-cv-01967-LO, in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Maryland at Baltimore.

As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter, the lawsuit
was filed on July 14, 2017, in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel
County, Maryland, and assigned Case No. C-02-CV-17-001368.  The
lawsuit was removed from the Circuit Court to the District Court.

The nature of suit is stated as consumer credit.

First Advantage Background Services Corporation provides
employment background checks, company research, and drug and
medical screening services.

The appellate case is captioned as Virginia Grimm v. The Board of
Trustees of the Community College of Baltimore County, et al.,
Case No. 18-1347, in the United States Court of Appeals for the
Fourth Circuit.[BN]

Plaintiff-Appellant VIRGINIA BARTON GRIMM, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, is represented by:

          Scott C. Borison, Esq.
          LEGG LAW FIRM, LLC
          1900 South Norfolk Road
          San Mateo, CA 94403
          Telephone: (301) 620-1016
          Facsimile: (301) 620-1018
          E-mail: borison@legglaw.com

               - and -

          Peter Albert Holland, Esq.
          Emanwel Josef Turnbull, Esq.
          HOLLAND LAW FIRM, PC
          914 Bay Ridge Road
          Annapolis, MD 21403
          Telephone: (410) 280-6133
          Facsimile: (410) 280-8650
          E-mail: peter@hollandlawfirm.com
                  eturnbull@hollandlawfirm.com

Defendant-Appellee THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
OF BALTIMORE COUNTY is represented by:

          Clifford Bernard Geiger, Esq.
          Peter Stephen Saucier, Esq.
          KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, P.A.
          1823 York Road
          Timonium, MD 21093-0000
          Telephone: (410) 727-4300
          Facsimile: (410) 727-4391
          E-mail: cgeiger@kollmanlaw.com
                  sauce23@kollmanlaw.com

Defendant FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP, d/b/a First
Advantage, is represented by:

          Edward Victor Arnold, Esq.
          SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP
          975 F Street, NW
          Washington, DC 20004-1454
          Telephone: (202) 828-3597
          Facsimile: (202) 828-5393
          E-mail: earnold@seyfarth.com


GIGA WATT: "Balestra" Suit Alleges Securities Act Violations
------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond Balestra, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Giga Watt, Inc., GigaWatt Pte Ltd.,
Cryptonomos Pte Ltd., and Dave Carlson, Case No. 2:18-cv-00103
(E.D. Wash., March 20, 2018), is brought against the Defendants
for violations of the Securities Act of 1933.

Plaintiff brings this action in connection with the Giga Watt
initial coin offering, which ran from approximately May 19, 2017
through July 31, 2017, Defendants raised over $20 million in
bitcoin, ethereum, and fiat currencies by offering and selling
unregistered securities, in the form of Giga Watt Tokens, in
direct violation of the Securities Act, notes the complaint.

On July 17, 2017, Plaintiff used .999564 ETH to purchase a total
of 162 WTT Tokens in connection with the Giga Watt ICO through
Cryptonomos' website, https://wtt.cryptonomos.com/  As of March
12, 2018, Plaintiff's 162 WTT Tokens is worth approximately $162.
In contrast, as of March 12, 2018, the .999564 ETH Plaintiff
invested in the Giga Watt ICO is worth approximately $700.

Defendant Giga Watt, Inc. is a Washington corporation that was
incorporated on December 15, 2016 and has its principle place of
business on 1 Campbell Pkwy, East Wenatchee, Washington 98802.
Giga Watt, Inc. offers mining solutions and hosting services at
its Wenatchee, Washington facilities.

Defendant GigaWatt Pte. Ltd. is a privately held, foreign for-
profit corporation that was incorporated on March 29, 2017, and
which maintains its headquarters at 1 Coleman Street #08-07,
Adelphi, Singapore. GigaWatt Pte. Ltd. sells mining equipment to
customers worldwide.

Defendant Cryptonomos is an affiliate of Giga Watt, Inc., as
Cryptonomos maintains the same business address and suite number
as Giga Watt Pte. Ltd.

Defendant Dave Carlson is the Chief Executive Officer and founder
of Defendant Giga Watt, Inc., and upon information and belief,
currently controls Defendant Giga Watt, Inc. and Defendant
GigaWatt Pte. Ltd. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Roger M. Townsend, Esq.
      BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND PLLC
      1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3670
      Seattle, WA 98104
      Tel: (206) 652-8660
      Fax: (206) 652-8290
      E-mail: rtownsend@bjtlegal.com


GOLDSMITH & HULL: Karcauskas Seeks Prelim. Nod of $20K Settlement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit titled POVILAS KARCAUSKAS, on behalf
of himself and all others similarly situated v. GOLDSMITH & HULL,
APC; WILLIAM I. GOLDSMITH; and DOES 1 to 10, Case No. 2:15-cv-
09225-FMO-RAO (C.D. Cal.), filed with the Court his unopposed
renewed motion for class certification and preliminary approval
of settlement agreement.

The class is defined as:

     (i) all persons having an address within the state of
     California (ii) who were sent a communication from
     Defendants Goldsmith & Hull or William I. Goldsmith in the
     form of Exhibit A (attached to the Complaint) (iii) when a
     wage garnishment order had not been obtained (iv) to recover
     a debt incurred for personal, family, or household purposes
     (v) which was not returned undelivered by the United States
     Postal Service (vi) during the period of time one year prior
     to the filing of the Complaint through the date of
     preliminary approval.

The parties also request that an oral hearing be scheduled on
this Motion and that the Plaintiff's co-counsel, O. Randolph
Bragg, Esq., be permitted to appear by telephone, as he works and
resides in Chicago, Illinois.

Essentially, the proposed settlement provides that G&H Defendants
will pay $20,000 (approximately 1% of their net worth) to the
class, whereby each class member will receive a pro rata share
(approximately $18.66 each, based on 1,072 putative class
members), and will pay additional amounts for the costs of notice
and administration up to $10,000, Karcauskas' statutory damages
of $2,000 pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and
-- except for Defendant William I. Goldsmith -- under the
California Fair Debt Collection Practices Action, California
Civil Code Section 1788, an incentive award of $5,000 to the
Class Representative, and attorney's fees, costs or expenses as
determined by the Court to be awarded to Class Counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=1MDkqDIy

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Robert Stempler, Esq.
          CONSUMER LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT STEMPLER, APC
          8200 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200
          Beverly Hills, CA 90211-2331
          Telephone: (323) 486-0102
          Facsimile: (323) 488-6895
          E-mail: E-mail: Robert@StopCollectionHarassment.com

               - and -

          O. Randolph Bragg, Esq.
          HORWITZ, HORWITZ & ASSOCIATES
          25 East Washington Street, Suite 900
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 372-8822
          Facsimile: (312) 372-1673
          E-mail: rand@horwitzlaw.com


GRITTEN WRECKER: "McCutcheon" Labor Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
----------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry McCutcheon, Individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Gritten Wrecker Service, LLC
and Todd Robinson, Defendants., Case No. 18-cv-00247 (W.D. Tex.,
March 15, 2018), seeks all available relief, including
compensation, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees and costs
pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards and Texas common law.

Gritten provides general towing, unlocking, off-road recovery and
fuel delivery services throughout the State of Texas where
McCutcheon worked for Gritten from approximately September 2016
until August 2017 as a tow truck driver/operator. McCutcheon was
paid $60.00 commission for each tow and/or recovery, but did not
receive overtime compensation at the required rate of time-and-
one-half for all hours worked over forty each workweek, says the
complaint. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Clif Alexander, Esq.
      Lauren E. Braddy, Esq.
      Alan Clifton Gordon, Esq.
      ANDERSON2X, PLLC
      819 N. Upper Broadway
      Corpus Christi, TX 78401
      Tel: (361) 452-1279
      Fax: (361) 452-1284
      Email: clif@a2xlaw.com
             lauren@a2xlaw.com
             cgordon@a2xlaw.com


HAIER US: Dooner Seeks Prelim. Approval of Class Settlement
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit styled CHARLES DOONER, et al.,
Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC., Case No. 1:17-cv-01635-KMW
(D.N.J.) ask the Court to enter an order:

   1. preliminarily approving the parties' Joint Stipulation of
      Settlement and Release;

   2. provisionally certifying the settlement class under
      Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3)of the Federal Rules of Civil
      Procedure, and finally certifying the settlement class
      under the Fair Labor Standards Act for purposes of
      effectuating the settlement;

   3. appointing as representatives of the class Charles Dooner,
      Frederick R. Shellhammer, III, Thomas Foley, David Leppo,
      and Anthony Chelpaty;

   4. appointing as Class Counsel, Swartz Swidler, LLC; Robert D.
      Soloff P.A.; and Alan Eichenbaum, Esq., based on their
      qualifications as provided in their declarations;

   5. appointing as the Settlement Administrator Angeion Group
      LLC and preliminarily approving its fees and costs as
      provided in its bid;

   6. approving the Notices of Settlement and Fairness Hearing
      for the opt-in and non-opt-in Plaintiffs, attached to the
      Settlement Agreement, and directing their distribution;

   7. preliminarily approving Class Counsel's requested fee award
      of 33 1/3% of the Settlement Fund;

   8. directing when Class Counsel must file a motion for final
      approval of the settlement sought in the Joint Stipulation;
      and

   9. scheduling a Final Settlement Fairness Hearing.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=z91O8Ip8

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Justin L. Swidler, Esq.
          Richard S. Swartz, Esq.
          SWARTZ SWIDLER, LLC
          1101 Kings Highway North, Suite 402
          Cherry Hill, NJ 08034
          Telephone: (856) 685-7420
          Facsimile: (856) 685-7417
          E-mail: jswindler@swartz-legal.com
                  rswartz@swartz-legal.com

               - and -

          Robert D. Soloff, Esq.
          ROBERT D. SOLOFF, P.A.
          7805 S.W. 6th Court
          Plantation, FL 33324
          Telephone: (954) 472-0002
          E-mail: robert@solofflaw.com

               - and -

          Alan Eichenbaum, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF ALAN EICHENBAUM
          7890 Peters Road, Suite G-102
          Plantation, FL 33324
          Telephone: (954) 900-4919
          E-mail: alanlaw@bellsouth.net


HARVARD COLLECTION: "Barnes" Suit Alleges FDCPA Violation
---------------------------------------------------------
Erica Barnes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Harvard Collection Services, Inc., Pendrick Capital
Partners II, LLC, and John Does 1-25, Case No. 3:18-cv-00382
(M.D. Fla., March 20, 2018), is brought against the Defendants
for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Plaintiff Erica Barnes is a resident of Jacksonville, Florida.

Defendants are debt collectors. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Justin Zeig, Esq.
      ZEIG LAW FIRM, LLC
      3475 Sheridan Street, Suite 310
      Hollywood, FL 33021
      E-mail: justin@zeiglawfirm.com


HONEYWELL INT'L: UAW Retirees Win Partial Summary Judgment
----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Denise Page Hood entered an order in the lawsuit
captioned INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND
AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW), and THOMAS BODE,
BRUCE EATON, WILLIAM BURNS, PETER ANTONELLIS, and others
similarly-situated v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., Case No.
2:11-cv-14036-DPH-DRG (E.D. Mich.):

   -- granting the Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary
      Judgment;

   -- permanently enjoining the Defendant from paying any amount
      less than the full premium for retirees' health care
      coverage under the 2003, 2007, 2011 CBAs and the Cleveland,
      Tennessee closing agreement;

   -- ruling that Defendant shall make whole those retirees for
      whom Defendant paid anything less than the full premium
      amount for health care coverage under the 2003, 2007, and
      2011 CBAs or the Cleveland, Tennessee closing agreement;

   -- denying Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;

   -- denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on
      Defendant's Breach of Implied Warranty Counterclaim;

   -- granting in part and denying in part Defendant's Motion for
      Summary Judgment;

   -- denying as moot Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel/Motion to
      Amend/Correct;

   -- denying Defendant's Motion for Leave to file Reply Brief
      re: Gallo v. Moen;

   -- denying without prejudice Defendant's Amended Motion to
      Certify Class; and

   -- ruling that the parties shall appear for a status
      conference on this matter last April 30, 2018, at 10:30
a.m.

The Plaintiffs, including the UAW and the individually named
Plaintiffs (retired hourly employees who worked for Defendant and
its predecessors), filed the action on September 15, 2011.  The
Plaintiffs alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act and an anticipatory breach of the collective
bargaining agreements ("CBAs") entered into by the UAW and
Honeywell, specifically, the scope and duration of retiree health
care benefits to which the retirees are entitled.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=rBcOv6zQ


ILLINOIS: Court Certifies LTC Medicaid Class in "Koss" Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Joan B. Gottschall granted in part and denied in part
the Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and motion for
preliminary injunction in the lawsuit captioned ALMA KOSS, et al.
v. FELICIA F. NORWOOD and JAMES T. DIMAS, Case No. 1:17-cv-02762
(N.D. Ill.).

Felicia F. Norwood is the director of the Illinois Department of
Healthcare and Family Services, while James T. Dimas is the
secretary of the Illinois Department of Human Services.

The Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied
in part, and Counts III and IV of the complaint are dismissed.
The Court certifies the LTC Medicaid pending class, as modified
in the Court's memorandum opinion and order, under Rule 23(b)(2)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Judge Gottschall also rules that until further order of the Court
or the entry of a final judgment, the Defendants are ordered to:

   (a) determine, on or before June 28, 2018, the eligibility of
       Class Members for the long-term care Medicaid benefits for
       which they have applied;

   (b) implement policies and processes to ensure that the
       Defendants prospectively comply with the Medicaid Act's
       deadlines for eligibility determination found in 42 U.S.C.
       Section 1396a(a)(8) and 42 C.F.R. 435.912; and

   (c) beginning June 28, 2018, pay the long-term care and other
       Medicaid benefits to (or for the benefit of) Class Members
       while their applications remain pending beyond the
       Medicaid Act's deadlines for eligibility determination.

The Defendants must file a status report on their compliance with
this preliminary injunction on or before April 30, 2018.  A
status conference is set for May 9, 2018, at 9:30 a.m.

In this putative statewide class action, Plaintiffs Alma Koss,
Wanda Wente, Mary Small, and Lessie Harris bring claims for
prospective injunctive and declaratory relief against the
Secretary of the Illinois Department of Human Services and the
Director of the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family
Services under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983; the Medicaid Act, and its
implementing regulations; Title II of the Americans with
Disabilities Act; the Rehabilitation Act; and the Due Process
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  The Plaintiffs' claims arise
from delays in processing and administering their applications to
be determined eligible for long-term Medicaid benefits used to
pay for the cost of their care in nursing facilities or
Supportive Living Facilities.

A copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=duEjDqyj


IMPERIAL MARBLE: Olson Moves to Certify Class of Ex-Employees
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit entitled JENNIFER OLSON on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated v. IMPERIAL MARBLE
CORPORATION, Case No. 1:18-cv-01914 (N.D. Ill.), moves the Court
for an order certifying a class and the specific statutory
provision contemplating class treatment of claims under the
Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.

The proposed class is comprised of all former employees of
Imperial Marble Corporation, who worked at or reported to the
facility located at 327 E. LaSalle Street, Somonauk, IL, 60552
and were terminated, without cause on their part, on or about
February 13, 2018, or within 30 days thereafter, who do not file
a timely request to opt-out of the class.

Ms. Olson also seeks an order:

   (a) appointing her as Class Representative;

   (b) appointing The Gardner Firm, P.C., Lankenau & Miller, LLP
       and Hiltz & Zanzig LLC as Class Counsel; and

   (c) approving the form and manner of Notice to the Class.

Ms. Olson notes that she is filing the Motion under the guidance
from the Court of Appeals in Damasco v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d
891 (7th Cir. 2011).

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=N3HnipJ7

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Stuart J. Miller, Esq.
          LANKENAU & MILLER, LLP
          132 Nassau Street, Suite 1100
          New York, NY 10038
          Telephone: (212) 581-5005
          Facsimile: (212) 581-2122
          E-mail: sjm@lankmill.com

               - and -

          Mary E. Olsen, Esq.
          M. Vance McCrary, Esq.
          THE GARDNER FIRM, PC
          210 S. Washington Ave.
          Mobile, AL 36602
          Telephone: (251) 433-8100
          Facsimile: (251) 433-8181
          E-mail: molsen@thegardnerfirm.com
                  vmccrary@thegardnerfirm.com

               - and -

          Blair R. Zanzig, Esq.
          John F. Hiltz, Esq.
          HILTZ & ZANZIG LLC
          53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 205
          Chicago, IL 60604
          Telephone: (312) 566-9008
          Facsimile: (312) 566-9015
          E-mail: bzanzig@hzlawgroup.com
                  jhiltz@hwzlaw.com


LE SPORTSAC: "Fischler" Suit Alleges ADA Violation
--------------------------------------------------
Brian Fischler, individually and on behalf of all other persons
similarly situated v. Le Sportsac, Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-
02533(S.D. N.Y., March 21, 2018), asserts claims under the
American with Disabilities Act, New York State Human Rights Law
and the New York City Human Rights Law.

Plaintiff brings this civil rights action against the Defendant
for its failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its
website, www.lesportsac.com, to be fully accessible to and
independently usable by Plaintiff Fischler and other blind or
visually impaired people. Le Sportsac denies full and equal
access to its Website.

Plaintiff Fischler is, at all relevant times, a resident of
Astoria, New York, Queens County. As a blind, visually-impaired
handicapped person, he is a member of a protected class of
individuals under Title III of the ADA.

Defendant Le Sportsac owns and operates stores throughout the
United States, including locations at 176 Spring Street, New
York, New York and 1065 Madison Avenue, New York, New York. It
sells, at these stores, luggage, accessories, handbags and
similar items. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Christopher H. Lowe, Esq.
      Douglas B. Lipsky, Esq.
      LIPSKY LOWE LLP
      630 Third Avenue, Fifth Floor
      New York, NY 10017-6705
      Tel: (212) 392-4772
      E-mail: chris@lipskylowe.com
              doug@lipskylowe.com


LVNV FUNDING: Seeks Prelim. OK Class Settlement in "Elliott" Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The parties in the lawsuit titled ANTHONY ELLIOTT v. LVNV
FUNDING, LLC, Case No. 3:16-cv-00675-TBR-LLK (W.D. Ky.), ask the
Court to enter an order:

   (1) certifying two classes for settlement purposes only:

       a. Class I: "Prejudgment Court Costs Class"

          All consumers against whom LVNV or its respective
          predecessors in interest, agents, employees, attorneys,
          or Kentucky, obtained a judgment against the consumer,
          and attempted to collect or did collect via a
          post-judgment garnishment between October 27, 2015 and
          the date the Court signs the order preliminarily
          approving the Settlement Agreement, prejudgment court
          costs from the consumer without filing a bill of costs
          itemizing the prejudgment court costs LVNV attempted to
          recover, or actually recovered.  Members of Class I
          include consumers against whom LVNV actually collected
          prejudgment court costs without filing a bill of costs
          itemizing the costs recovered from the consumer and
          those consumers whom LVNV attempted to, but did not
          collect prejudgment court costs without filing a bill
          of costs itemizing the costs sought to be recovered
          from the consumer; and

       b. Class II: "Judgment Lien Filing Fee and Garnishment Fee
          Class"

          All consumers against whom LVNV or its respective
          predecessors in interest, agents, employees, attorneys,
          or representatives (collectively, "LVNV"), filed a
          lawsuit in Kentucky, obtained a judgment against the
          consumer, and attempted to collect or did collect via a
          post-judgment garnishment between October 27, 2015 and
          the date the Court signs the order preliminarily
          approving the Settlement Agreement, a post-judgment
          filing fee paid by LVNV to file a "Notice of Judgment
          Lien Upon Real Estate" pursuant to a judgment entered
          against the consumer. Members of Class II include
          consumers against whom LVNV actually collected a
          post-judgment filing fee paid by LVNV to file a "Notice
          of Judgment Lien Upon Real Estate" pursuant to a
          judgment entered against the consumer and those
          consumers against whom LVNV attempted to, but did not
          collect a post-judgment filing fee paid by LVNV to file
          a "Notice of Judgment Lien Upon Real Estate" pursuant
          to a judgment entered against the consumer.  Members of
          Class II also include all consumers against whom LVNV
          filed a lawsuit in Kentucky, obtained a judgment
          against the consumer, and attempted to collect or did
          collect via a post-judgment garnishment between
          October 27, 2015 and the date the Court signs the order
          preliminarily approving the Settlement Agreement, a
          post-judgment garnishment fee paid by LVNV to either a
          garnishee or a clerk of court to file a garnishment to
          enforce a judgment entered against a consumer.  This
          includes consumers against whom LVNV actually collected
          a post-judgment garnishment fee paid by LVNV to file a
          garnishment to enforce a judgment entered against the
          consumer and those consumers against whom LVNV
          attempted to, but did not collect a post-judgment
          garnishment fee paid by LVNV to file a garnishment to
          enforce a judgment entered against the consumer.

   (2) preliminarily approving the proposed Settlement Agreement;

   (3) directing notice to the Class; and

   (4) setting dates for opt-outs, objections, and a hearing
       under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil
       Procedure for final approval of the Settlement Agreement
       and the granting of a final judgment.

The lawsuit is brought for alleged violations of, among other
things, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Kentucky state
law.

With respect to participating settlement class members, LVNV
shall issue these settlement benefits:

   a. Classes I and II: Active Accounts
      Active Accounts: Those members of Classes I and II whose
      Accounts are active.

      Settlement Benefits (actual damages): LVNV shall credit
      the Class Members' Judgment Balance with the prejudgment
      court costs sought to be collected, and any payment made by
      the Class Member that went in total or in part to
      prejudgment court costs will be reversed and reapplied to
      the Judgment Balance.

      Settlement Benefits (statutory damages): LVNV shall credit
      each Class Members' Judgment Balance an additional $75.

   b. Classes I and II: Paid, Settled, or Written Off Accounts
      Paid, Settled, or Written Off Accounts: Those members of
      Classes I and II whose Accounts are paid, settled, or
      written off.

      Settlement Benefits (actual damages): LVNV shall make a
      cash payment to the Class Members in an amount of any
      payment made by the Class Member that went in total or in
      part to prejudgment court costs, whether the Account was
      paid, settled, or written off by LVNV.  If the Account was
      written off, LVNV agrees that said accounts are forever
      released and permanently uncollectable.

      Settlement Benefits (statutory damages): LVNV shall make an
      additional cash payment of $75.00 to each Class Member.

LVNV shall also file a satisfaction of said Judgment paid-in-full
through the credits provided for in this Settlement Agreement and
LVNV shall release any judgment lien filed as a result of said
Judgment.  LVNV has also agreed to pay an incentive payment of
$3,000 to the Plaintiff, Anthony Elliott, subject to Court
approval.

LVNV shall pay reasonable attorney's fees and costs in the sum of
$80,000 to the Plaintiff's counsel, subject to Court approval.
LVNV shall cause to be mailed by first class mail: (1) the Class
Notice and Claim Form; and (2) the settlement checks where
applicable.

A copy of the Joint Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Uq5yJmTH

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          James R. McKenzie, Esq.
          JAMES R. MCKENZIE ATTORNEY, PLLC
          115 S. Sherrin Avenue, Suite 5
          Louisville, KY 40207
          Telephone: (502) 371-2179
          Facsimile: (502) 257-7309
          E-mail: jrmckenzie5@hotmail.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Gregory S. Berman, Esq.
          Jordan M. White, Esq.
          WYATT, TARRANT & COMBS, LLP
          500 West Jefferson Street, Suite 2800
          Louisville, KY 40202
          Telephone: (502) 562-7362
          Facsimile: (502) 589-0309
          E-mail: gberman@wyattfirm.com
                  jwhite@wyattfirm.com


MARRIOTT INT'L: Court Refuses to Certify Class in "Arias" Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Colleen Kollar-Kotelly denies the motion for class
certification filed by the Plaintiff in the lawsuit entitled
ROSA ARIAS v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., Case No. 1:15-cv-
01258-CKK (D.D.C.).

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion,
the Court denies the Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification,
and denies as moot the Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of
Harry T. Spikes, Sr., Esq., as Interim Class Counsel.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=1gR6fZd2


MDL 2741: "Roosevelt" Suit Included in Roundup Liability MDL
------------------------------------------------------------
The lawsuit styled ESTATE OF Riley Roosevelt, by and through his
Surviving Spouse, Jenia Roosevelt, on behalf of all legal heirs
of Riley Roosevelt v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Case No. 4:18-cv-00417,
was transferred on March 30, 2018, from the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri to the U.S. District Court
for the Northern District of California (San Francisco).

The California District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:18-cv-
01962-VC to the proceeding.

The lawsuit is consolidated in the multidistrict litigation
titled IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, MDL No.
2741.

The lawsuit is an action for damages allegedly suffered by the
Plaintiffs as a direct and proximate result of the Defendant's
negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design,
development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting,
marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and/or sale of
the herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient
glyphosate.

The Plaintiffs maintain that Roundup(R) and/or glyphosate is
defective, dangerous to human health, unfit and unsuitable to be
marketed and sold in commerce, and lacked proper warnings and
directions as to the dangers associated with its use.  "Roundup"
refers to all formulations of the Defendant's Roundup products,
including Roundup Concentrate Poison Ivy and Tough Brush Killer
1, Roundup Custom Herbicide, Roundup D-Pak Herbicide, Roundup Dry
Concentrate, Roundup Export Herbicide, and Roundup Fence & Hard
Edger 1.

Monsanto Company is a Delaware corporation, with a principal
place of business in St. Louis, Missouri.  Monsanto is a
multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation.  Monsanto
advertises and sells goods, specifically Roundup, in the states
of Missouri and Louisiana.  Monsanto is the world's leading
producer of glyphosate.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Kirk J. Goza, Esq.
          GOZA HONNOLD TRIAL LAWYERS
          11181 Overbrook Road, Suite 200
          Leawood, KS 66211
          Telephone: (913) 451-3433
          Facsimile: (913) 839-0567
          E-mail: kgoza@gohonlaw.com


MDL 2840: "Baker" Fraud Suit Transferred to S.D. Florida
--------------------------------------------------------
In the case docketed as Mark Baker, Cornerstone Growth, LP, and
all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Comerica Bank,
Defendant, Case No. 18-cv-60524 (S.D. Fla., March 12, 2018),
Plaintiffs move the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to
transfer all Related Actions currently pending in the Southern
District of Florida and the Central District of California
against Comerica Bank, as well as any potential tag-along
actions, to the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Florida for consolidated pre-trial proceedings under
MDL No. 2840, dated March 15, 2018.

Plaintiffs seeks damages, restitution, and all other relief
resulting from unjust enrichment and in violation of the
Electronic Funds Transfer Act, Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, California's Unfair Competition Law and California's
Consumer Legal Remedies Act.

Plaintiffs purchased investments from the Woodbridge group of
companies. These companies marketed promissory notes and other
offerings as low-risk, high-yield investments backed by high-
interest real-estate loans to third-party commercial borrowers.
However, most of the allegedly supporting loans were to their own
shell companies. Lacking the revenue to pay returns owed to
Plaintiffs and other investors, Shapiro paid the returns using
new investor money, raising more than $1.22 billion before the
Ponzi-like scheme collapsed. Each Woodbridge bank account was
opened and maintained at Comerica Bank. The latter continued to
harbor Shapiro's fraud even after several state regulatory
agencies ordered him to cease and desist operations. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Harley S. Tropin, Esq.
      Gail A. McQuilkin, Esq.
      Rachel Sullivan, Esq.
      Robert J. Neary, Esq.
      Daniel Maland, Esq.
      KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON LLP
      2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., 9th Floor
      Coral Gables, FL 33134
      Telephone: (305) 372-1800
      Facsimile: (305) 372-3508
      Email: hst@kttlaw.com
             gam@kttlaw.com
             rs@kttlaw.com
             rn@kttlaw.com
             dmaland@kttlaw.com

             - and -

      William R. Scherer, III, Esq.
      SCHERER & MARX, PLLC
      633 South Federal Highway, 4th Floor
      Fort Lauderdale FL 33301
      Tel: (954) 482-1660
      Email: william@srmxlaw.com


MERCK & CO: Faces LEHB Suit Over Zetia(R) Antitrust Violations
--------------------------------------------------------------
LAW ENFORCEMENT HEALTH BENEFITS INC., on behalf of itself and all
others similarly situated v. MERCK & CO., INC.; MERCK SHARP &
DOHME CORP.; SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP.; SCHERING CORP.; MSP SINGAPORE
CO. LLC; GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD.; GLENMARK GENERICS INC.,
U.S.A.; and PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Case No. 1:18-cv-01900
(E.D.N.Y., March 28, 2018), is brought for claims under federal
and state antitrust, consumer protection, and unjust enrichment
laws to recover damages and to obtain injunctive and equitable
relief for injuries caused by the Defendants.

The Plaintiff's claims stem from the Defendants' alleged
anticompetitive scheme unreasonably to restrain competition in
the market for Zetia(R) and its AB-rated generic equivalents sold
in the United States.  The complaint stems from a scheme by the
Defendants to make billions of dollars by delaying competition
for the cholesterol-reducing drug, ezetimibe.  For years, the
Plaintiff contends, Merck earned handsome returns on the branded
version of this drug, Zetia.

According to the complaint, Glenmark aimed to challenge Merck's
monopoly and to sell generic Zetia and applied to the FDA for the
right to do so.  Merck sued for patent infringement, and Glenmark
responded that the patents underlying Zetia were invalid because
they had been obtained through fraud.  Then, on the eve of trial,
when it seemed Glenmark was going to prevail, the parties
settled.  The settlement resulted in a sweetheart deal involving
an agreement that Glenmark and Par, Glenmark's U.S. distributor,
would forego competing for five years, leaving Merck as the
entrenched monopolist, and that when it was Glenmark's and Par's
turn to dominate the market, Merck would return the favor by not
manufacturing its own generic version of Zetia to compete with
them.

LEHB is a voluntary employee benefits plan organized pursuant to
Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code to provide health
benefits to its eligible participants and beneficiaries.  LEHB's
members are current and retired sworn Philadelphia Police
Officers, Deputy Sheriffs, County Detectives and their
dependents.

Merck & Company, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the state of New Jersey, with its principal
place of business in Kenilworth, New Jersey.  It is or was the
parent company of Defendants Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation and
MSP Singapore Company LLC.  Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation is a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of
New Jersey, with its principal place of business in Kenilworth.
MSP Singapore Company LLC is a company organized and existing
under the laws of the state of Delaware, with a principal place
of business in Kenilworth.  MSP is a subsidiary of Merck &
Company, Inc. and was the exclusive licensee of the relevant
patents.

Schering-Plough Corporation was a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the state of New Jersey, with a
principal place of business in Kenilworth.  Schering Corporation
was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
state of New Jersey, with a principal place of business in
Kenilworth.

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited is a company organized and
existing under the laws of India, with its corporate office
located in Mumbai, India.  Glenmark Generics Inc., U.S.A.,
formerly known as Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., U.S.A., is a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware and having a principal place of business in Mahwah, New
Jersey.  It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Glenmark
Pharmaceuticals Limited.

Par Pharmaceutical Inc. is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of New York and having a principal
place of business in Chestnut Ridge, New York.  Par is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Endo International plc, an Irish corporation
with its principal place of business located in Dublin,
Ireland.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Robert G. Eisler, Esq.
          Deborah A. Elman, Esq.
          Chad B. Holtzman, Esq.
          Allison J. McCowan, Esq.
          GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
          485 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10017
          Telephone: (646) 722-8500
          Facsimile: (646) 722-8501
          E-mail: reisler@gelaw.com
                  delman@gelaw.com
                  choltzman@gelaw.com
                  amccowan@gelaw.com


MERCK & CO: Providence Files Suit Over Zetia Price Conspiracy
-------------------------------------------------------------
City of Providence, Rhode Island, on behalf of itself and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Merck & Company, Inc.,
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Schering-Plough Corporation,
Schering Corporation, MSP Singapore Company LLC, Glenmark
Pharmaceuticals Limited and Glenmark Generics Inc., USA,
Defendants, Case No. 18-cv-10498 (D. Mass., March 15, 2018),
seeks damages plus interest, including reasonable attorneys' fees
and such other and further relief resulting from unjust
enrichment, conspiracy and combination in restraint of trade and
in violation of various state consumer protection laws.

Merck and Glenmark allegedly connived for Glenmark not to compete
in the Zetia market. Zetia is a cholesterol drug that counteracts
plaque development in arteries. Merck avoided patent invalidation
and retained its lucrative Zetia monopoly until Glenmark entered
with its generic product. Merck allegedly gained from Glenmark's
agreement to postpone generic entry during the six months in
which Glenmark enjoyed generic exclusivity due to Merck's
agreement not to launch an authorized generic version of Zetia.
Such anticompetitive agreement monopolized the price of Zetia,
says the complaint.

City of Providence, Rhode Island is a municipal corporation that
operates a self-insured health and welfare benefit plan and
purchases, pays and/or provides reimbursement for its employees,
retirees, and/or plan beneficiaries. It purchased, paid and/or
provided reimbursement for Zetia and/or its generic equivalent.

Merck & Company, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Schering-
Plough Corporation, Schering Corporation and MSP Singapore
Company LLC are pharmaceutical companies that operate under the
Merck brand.

Glenmark is an Indian pharmaceutical company with US presence.
[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Nathaniel L. Orenstein, Esq.
      John Sutter, Esq.
      BERMAN TABACCO
      One Liberty Square
      Boston, MA 02109
      Tel: (617) 542-8300
      Fax: (617) 542-1194
      Email: norenstein@bermantabacco.com
             jsutter@bermantabacco.com

             - and -

      Todd A. Seaver, Esq.
      BERMAN TABACCO
      44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
      San Francisco, CA 94104
      Tel: (415) 433-3200
      Fax: (415) 433-6382
      Email: tseaver@bermantabacco.com

             - and -

      Michael M. Buchman, Esq.
      Erin C. Durba, Esq.
      Michelle C. Zolnoski, Esq.
      MOTLEY RICE LLC
      600 Third Avenue, Suite 2101
      New York, NY 10016
      Telephone: (212) 577-0040
      Facsimile: (212) 577-0050
      Email: mbuchman@motleyrice.com
             edurba@motleyrice.com
             mzolnoski@motleyrice.com


MILITARY SYSTEMS: "Mosley" Suit Seeks to Recover Overtime Wages
---------------------------------------------------------------
JAMES MOSLEY, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated
v. MILITARY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC., A Domestic For-Profit
Corporation, Case No. 3:18-cv-00318 (M.D. Tenn., March 28, 2018),
seeks to recover alleged unpaid overtime wages, an additional
equal amount as liquidated damages, obtain declaratory relief,
and reasonable attorney's fees and costs pursuant to the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Military Systems Group Inc. manufactures and distributes weapon
mounting products.  The Company offers gun mounts, swing arms,
ammunition cans and bins, stands, counting brackets, and
accessories.  The Company caters to United States Army, Navy, Air
Force, and Marines.  The Company was founded in 1984 and is based
in Nashville, Tennessee.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brian Christopher Winfrey, Esq.
          MORGAN & MORGAN
          2002 Richard Jones Rd. Suite B-200
          Nashville, TN 37215
          Telephone: (615) 601-1276
          Facsimile: (615) 928-9917
          E-mail: BWinfrey@forthepeople.com


NATIONAL DOCUMENT: "Sadrarhami" Suit Alleges TCPA Violation
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ali Sadrarhami, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. National Document Processing, LLC dba
National Student Loans, Case No. 8:18-cv-00459 (C.D. Calif.,
March 22, 2018), seeks damages pursuant to the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act.

The Plaintiff Ali Sadrarhami is a resident of the Orange County,
State of California.

The Defendant National Document Processing, LLC is a private
company, not affiliated with the department of education or any
academic or governmental entity. The Defendant offers loan
consolidation services and repayment programs.  [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Joshua B. Swigart, Esq.
      Yana A. Hart, Esq.
      HYDE & SWIGART, APC
      2221 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 101
      San Diego, CA 92108-3551
      Tel: (619) 233-7770
      Fax: (619) 297-1022
      E-mail: josh@westcoastlitigation.com
              yana@westcoastlitigation.com


NEW JERSEY: Aruanno Appeals Ruling in "Alves" to 3rd Cir.
---------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff Joseph Aruanno filed an appeal from a court ruling in
the lawsuit entitled Raymond Alves, et al. v. Merrill Main, et
al., Case No. 2-01-cv-00789, in the U.S. District Court for the
District of New Jersey.

As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter, Joseph
Aruanno, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, previously
petitioned for a writ of mandamus in connection with the District
Court's alleged failure to rule on his pending motion to reopen
Bagarozy, et al. v. Harris, et al., D.N.J. No. 04-cv-03066.  Mr.
Aruanno, who is civilly committed under the New Jersey Sexually
Violent Predator Act to the Special Treatment Unit Annex in
Avenel, New Jersey, is a plaintiff in a consolidated class action
alleging inadequate therapeutic treatment and punitive conditions
of confinement in New Jersey's STU facilities.  The litigation
began in 2001, with the filing of the "Alves" Case.  He has also
previously appealed other ruling in the "Alves" Case.

The appellate case is captioned as Raymond Alves, et al. v.
Merrill Main, et al., Case No. 18-1691, in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.[BN]

Plaintiffs-Appellees RAYMOND ALVES, MICHAEL CULBRETH and DERRICK
SESSOMS, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly
situated, are represented by:

          Jennifer B. Condon, Esq.
          SETON HALL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
          833 McCarter Highway
          Newark, NJ 07102
          Telephone: (973) 642-8700
          E-mail: jenny-brooke.condon@shu.edu

               - and -

          Lawrence S. Lustberg, Esq.
          GIBBONS P.C.
          One Gateway Center
          Newark, NJ 07102
          Telephone: (973) 596-4731
          Facsimile: (973) 639-6285
          E-mail: llustberg@gibbonslaw.com

Defendants-Appellees MERRIL MAIN, Ph.D., in his official capacity
as Clinical Director of the Special Treatment Unit; COMMISSIONER
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; LYNN A. KOVICH, in her
official capacity as Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Director
of the New Jersey Division of Mental Health and Addiction
Services; and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY are represented by:

          David L. DaCosta, Esq.
          OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
          Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex
          25 Market Street
          Trenton, NJ 08625
          Telephone: (609) 341-3689
          E-mail: dacosdav@dol.lps.state.nj.us


NORTHLAND GROUP: Santiago Obtains Final OK of Class Settlement
--------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor issued an order granting a
motion certifying the case to proceed as a class action and
granting final approval of the parties' class settlement
agreement in the lawsuit styled NORMA I. SANTIAGO, on behalf of
herself and those similarly situated v. NORTHLAND GROUP INC.; and
PINNACLE CREDIT SERVICES, LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-03608-CLW
(D.N.J.), according to court docket entry dated April 9, 2018.

A copy of the Notice of Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=VjxForcr

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Bharati Sharma Patel, Esq.
          THE WOLF LAW FIRM, LLC
          1520 U.S. Highway 130 - Suite 101
          North Brunswick, NJ 08902
          Telephone: (732) 545-7900
          Facsimile: (732) 545-1030
          E-mail: bpatel@wolflawfirm.net

               - and -

          Yongmoon Kim, Esq.
          KIM LAW FIRM, LLC
          411 Hacksensack Avenue, 2nd Floor
          Hackensack, NJ 07601
          Telephone: (201) 273-7117
          Facsimile: (201) 273-7117
          E-mail: ykim@kimlf.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Han Sheng Beh, Esq.
          HINSHAW & CULBERTON LLP
          800 Third Avenue, 13th Floor
          New York, NY 1002
          Telephone: (212) 471-6238
          E-mail: hbeh@hinshawlaw.com


OCWEN LOAN: FCCPA Class and FDCPA Subclass Certified in "Belcher"
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Steven D. Merryday granted the Plaintiff's motion for
class certification in the lawsuit captioned TIMOTHY J. BELCHER
v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Case No. 8:16-cv-00690-SDM-AEP
(M.D. Fla.).

     The FCCPA class comprises:

     "All individuals in the State of Florida who: (1) were
     offered a HAMP loan modification by Defendant (2) for a debt
     incurred for personal, family, or household purposes, (3)
     accepted that offer by making a payment, (4) successfully
     completed the HAMP trial period for permanent loan
     modification of the debt by making three requisite monthly
     payments, and (5) during the HAMP trial period received a
     written delinquency notice from Defendant threatening the
     individual with foreclosure or the incurrence of additional
     fees if the individual failed to pay his or her unmodified
     loan amount, (6) on or after March 18, 2014."

     The FDCPA subclass comprises:

     "All individuals in the State of Florida who: (1) were
     offered a HAMP loan modification by Defendant (2) for a debt
     incurred for personal, family, or household purposes and (3)
     for a debt that Defendant acquired after it was in default,
     (4) accepted that offer by making a payment, (5)
     successfully completed the HAMP trial period for permanent
     loan modification of the debt by making three requisite
     monthly payments, and (6) during the HAMP trial period
     received a written delinquency notice from Defendant
     threatening the individual with foreclosure or the
     incurrence of additional fees if the individual failed to
     pay his or her unmodified loan amount, (7) on or after
     March 18, 2015."

According to the Court's order, the Magistrate Judge recommends
granting Timothy J. Belcher's motion for class certification;
recommends certifying a Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act
class and a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act subclass;
recommends appointing the law firm of Kynes, Markman & Felman,
P.A., as class counsel; and recommends appointing Belcher as
class representative.  Both parties object to the report and
recommendation.

Judge Merryday states that a de novo review of the Report and
Recommendation reveals that the Defendant's objections are
unfounded.  Accordingly, the Defendant's objections are
overruled.

The Plaintiff's objections are sustained to the extent that
Claire Meryl Brueck, James Frazier Carraway, Katherine Earle
Yanes, and Brandon Kyle Breslow are appointed as class counsel.

Accordingly, Judge Merryday rules, the Report and Recommendation
is adopted-in-part.  The Plaintiff's motion for class
certification is granted and Belcher is appointed as class
representative.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=GmYh0YDp


OGORGEOUS INC: Faces "Sullivan" Over Deaf-Inaccessible Web Site
---------------------------------------------------------------
PHILLIP SULLIVAN, JR., on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated v. OGORGEOUS INC. d/b/a POP PILATES, Case No.
1:18-cv-02737 (S.D.N.Y., March 28, 2018), seeks to put an end to
alleged systemic civil rights violations committed by the
Defendant against the deaf and hard of hearing individuals in New
York State and across the United States.

Mr. Sullivan alleges the Defendant is denying the deaf and hard
of hearing individuals throughout the United States equal access
to the goods and services it provides to non-disabled individuals
through http://www.poppilateslife.com/. The Web site provides to
the public online content regarding fitness and Pilates workouts
through a wide array of virtual online courses, trainings,
workshops, services, and other programs offered by the Defendant.

Headquartered in Fremont, California, Ogorgeous Inc., doing
business as Pop Pilates, is an American for-profit corporation
organized under the laws of California and is registered in the
state of California to do business.  The Defendant operates the
Web site, a health and fitness online content provider that
teaches Pilates completed with pop music, through video courses
and playlists and an ecommerce feature that allows Defendant to
sell its products and services.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          C.K. Lee, Esq.
          Anne Seelig, Esq.
          LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC
          30 East 39th Street, Second Floor
          New York, NY 10016
          Telephone: (212) 465-1188
          Facsimile: (212) 465-1181
          E-mail: cklee@leelitigation.com


OMNICELL INC: "Beard" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Michael K. Beard, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Omnicell, Inc., Case No. 3:18-cv-00304
(M.D. Tenn., March 22, 2018), seeks to recover unpaid overtime
wages, liquidated damages, costs, and attorneys' fees pursuant to
the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Plaintiff Michael K. Beard is currently a resident of the
State of Tennessee. The Plaintiff was employed by Defendant as a
non-exempt hourly paid IT Support Engineer at the 443 Donelson
Pike, Suite 200, Nashville, TN 37214 location from approximately
November 2013 through February 2017.

The Defendant Omnicell, Inc. provides automation and business
analytics software solutions for medication and supply management
in healthcare worldwide. The Defendant maintains a principal
place of business at 590 E. Middlefield Rd., Mountain View, CA
94043-4008. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Gregory F. Coleman, Esq.
      Lisa A. White, Esq.
      Adam A. Edwards, Esq.
      GREG COLEMAN LAW PC
      First Tennessee Plaza
      800 South Gay Street, Suite 1100
      Knoxville, TN 37929
      Tel: (865) 247-0080
      Fax: (865) 522-0049
      E-mail: greg@gregcolemanlaw.com
              lisa@gregcolemanlaw.com
              adam@gregcolemanlaw.com


PERMANENTE MEDICAL: Wolf Seeks Prelim. OK of $2.9-Mil. Settlement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The parties in the lawsuit captioned DEBRA WOLF, individually and
on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals v. THE
PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a California corporation, Case
No. 3:17-cv-05345-VC (N.D. Cal.), jointly move the Court to:

   (1) conditionally certify a settlement class, which comprises
       all current and former hourly TSRs who have worked for
       TPMG from September 14, 2013 through preliminary approval;

   (2) preliminarily approve the parties' proposed $2,950,000
       class action settlement;

   (3) appoint the Plaintiff and opt-in plaintiff Natty Medrano
       as the Class Representatives, their counsel as Class
       Counsel, and Simpluris, Inc., as Settlement Administrator;

   (4) approve the forms of notice to the class of the
       settlement, the Class Member Information Sheet, and the
       Election Not to Participate in the Settlement; and

   (5) schedule a hearing on the final approval of the Settlement
       for October 5, 2017, or as soon thereafter as the Court is
       available.

The case is an FLSA/California wage-and-hour hybrid
collective/class action.  Plaintiff Wolf and opt-in Plaintiff
Medrano and the putative class members are 1,614 "Teleservice
Representatives" ("TSRs"), who staffed three call centers
operated by TPMG and located in Sacramento, San Jose and Vallejo.

The $2,950,000 "Total Settlement Amount" will cover: (a) class
member payments to all participating class members; (b) the
payment to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency
(the "LWDA") of $37,500 for PAGA penalties; (c) the Class
Representative Service Payments up to $10,000 ($7,500 for
Plaintiff Wolf and $2,500 for opt-in Plaintiff Medrado); (d)
Class Counsel's fees and costs up to $777,500 (25% of the Total
Settlement Amount for fees plus $40,000 for costs); and (d) the
settlement administration costs up to $35,000.

The parties also ask the Court to adopt this schedule for
purposes of effectuating the various steps in the settlement
approval process:

   * Deadline for Filing Preliminary Approval Motion -- March 29,
     2018;

   * Deadline for TPMG to mail CAFA notices -- April 9, 2018;

   * Preliminary Approval Hearing Date -- May 3, 2018;

   * Entry of Preliminary Approval Order -- May 3, 2018;

   * TPMG to provide the Settlement Administrator with addresses
     for Class Notice to be mailed -- May 18, 2018;

   * Deadline for the Settlement Administrator to mail Class
     Notice Packet (Mailing Date) -- June 4, 2018;

   * Deadline for filing Motion for Fees and Costs -- July 5,
     2018;

   * Deadline for Class Members to mail Elections Not to
     Participate in Settlement and Objections -- July 19, 2018;

   * Deadline for Parties to file response to objections --
     Within 7 days before Final Fairness Hearing;

   * Deadline for filing Final Approval Motion -- No later than
     35 days in advance of Final Approval Hearing;

   * Final Approval Hearing -- September 6, 2018.

The Court will commence a hearing on May 3, 2018, at 10:00 a.m.,
to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Joint Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=E1eYwTxr

The Plaintiffs and Proposed Class and Collective Members are
represented by:

          Jahan C. Sagafi, Esq.
          OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
          One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (415) 638-8800
          Facsimile: (415) 638-8810
          E-mail: jsagafi@outtengolden.com

               - and -

          Kevin J. Stoops, Esq.
          Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
          Charles R. Ash, IV, Esq.
          SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
          One Towne Square, Suite 1700
          Southfield, MI 48076
          Telephone: (248) 355-0300
          Facsimile: (248) 436-8453
          E-mail: Jthompson@sommerspc.com
                  kstoops@sommerspc.com
                  crash@sommerspc.com

Defendant The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., is represented by:

          Jeffrey D. Wohl, Esq.
          Caitlin M. Wang, Esq.
          PAUL HASTINGS LLP
          101 California Street, 48th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (415) 856-7000
          Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
          E-mail: jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
                  caitlinmarianwang@paulhastings.com


PRIME COMMUNICATIONS: Wins Bid to Amend Class in "Lorenzo" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Malcolm J. Howard enters an order in the lawsuit
entitled ROSE LORENZO, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated v. PRIME COMMUNICATIONS, L.P., a Texas General
Partnership, Case No. 5:12-cv-00069-H-KS (E.D.N.C.), granting the
Defendant's alternative motion to amend the class definition and
redefines the class as follows:

     All natural persons employed by Prime Communications, L.P.,
     in retail stores and kiosks in the State of North Carolina
     from May 4, 2010 to November 30, 2013 who were paid
     commissions or bonuses during that same period based on
     point of sales transactions.

The matter is before the Court on the Defendant's motion to
decertify or amend the Rule 23 class previously certified in this
action.  On January 31, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge
Kimberly A. Swank filed a memorandum and recommendation (M&R)
recommending that Prime's motion to decertify the Rule 23 class
be denied and Prime's motion to amend the Rule 23 class be
granted.  The Defendant objected to the M&R, and Plaintiffs
responded.  The parties also filed, as directed by Magistrate
Judge Swank, a joint notice regarding a proposed amendment to the
class definition.

The Court adopts the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as
its own. Defendant's motion to decertify the class is denied and
the Defendant's alternative motion to amend the class definition
is granted.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=BL9nrdkP


PROFESSIONAL PLACEMENT: Untershine Moves for Class Certification
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ronald Untershine moves the Court to certify the class described
in the complaint of the lawsuit entitled RONALD UNTERSHINE,
Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v.
PROFESSIONAL PLACEMENT SERVICES LLC and CAPITAL ONE N.A., Case
No. 2:18-cv-00501 (E.D. Wisc.), and further asks that the Court
both stay the motion for class certification and to grant the
Plaintiff (and the Defendants) relief from the Local Rules
setting automatic briefing schedules and requiring briefs and
supporting material to be filed with the Motion.

Dicta in the Supreme Court's decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v.
Gomez, left open the possibility that a defendant facing a class
action complaint could moot a class representative's case by
depositing funds equal to or in excess of the maximum value of
the plaintiff's individual claim with the court and having the
court enter judgment in the plaintiff's favor prior to the filing
of a class certification motion, the Plaintiff asserts, citing
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, 136 S. Ct. 663, 672 (2016).

To avoid the risk of a defendant mooting a putative class
representative's individual stake in the litigation, the Seventh
Circuit instructed plaintiffs to file a certification motion with
the complaint, along with a motion to stay briefing on the
certification motion.  Damasco v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891,
896 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled on other grounds, Chapman v. First
Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015) ("The pendency of
that motion [for class certification] protects a putative class
from attempts to buy off the named plaintiffs.").

While the Seventh Circuit has held that the specific procedure
described in Campbell-Ewald cannot force the individual
settlement of a class representative's claims, the same decision
cautions that other methods may prevent a plaintiff from
representing a class, the Plaintiff tells the Court, citing
Fulton Dental, LLC v. Bisco, Inc., No. 16-3574, 2017 U.S. App.
LEXIS 10839 *9-10 (7th Cir. June 20, 2017).  The Plaintiff
asserts that one defendant has attempted a similar tactic by
sending a certified check to the proposed class representative.
Bonin v. CBS Radio, Inc., No. 16-cv-674-CNC (E.D. Wis.); see also
Severns v. Eastern Account Systems of Connecticut, Inc., Case No.
15-cv-1168, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23164 (E.D. Wis. Feb. 24,
2016).

The Plaintiff is obligated to move for class certification to
protect the interests of the putative class, the Plaintiff
contends.

As the Motion to certify a class is a placeholder motion as
described in Damasco, the parties and the Court should not be
burdened with unnecessary paperwork and the resulting expense
when short motion to certify and stay should suffice until an
amended motion is filed, the Plaintiff contends.

The Plaintiff also asks to be appointed as class representative,
and for the appointment of Ademi & O'Reilly, LLP, as class
counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=DScR7Gvw

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          John D. Blythin, Esq.
          Mark A. Eldridge, Esq.
          Jesse Fruchter, Esq.
          Ben J. Slatky, Esq.
          ADEMI & O'REILLY, LLP
          3620 East Layton Avenue
          Cudahy, WI 53110
          Telephone: (414) 482-8000
          Facsimile: (414) 482-8001
          E-mail: jblythin@ademilaw.com
                  meldridge@ademilaw.com
                  jfruchter@ademilaw.com
                  bslatky@ademilaw.com


RENO HOUSING: Ninth Circuit Appeal Filed in "Roces" Class Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs Joaquin Roces, Judith Lopez, Juan Lopez, Jaime Villa
and Melisa Chavez filed an appeal from a court ruling entered in
their lawsuit titled Joaquin Roces, et al. v. Reno Housing
Authority, Case No. 3:15-cv-00408-RCJ-WGC, in the U.S. District
Court for Nevada, Reno.

As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter, the lawsuit
is brought against the Defendants for alleged failure to properly
pay all wages due in violation of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

The appellate case is captioned as Joaquin Roces, et al. v. Reno
Housing Authority, Case No. 18-15525, in the United States Court
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

The briefing schedule in the Appellate Case is set as follows:

   -- Transcript must be ordered by April 27, 2018;

   -- Transcript is due on May 29, 2018;

   -- Appellants Melisa Chavez, Juan Lopez, Judith Lopez, Joaquin
      Roces and Jaime Villa's opening brief is due on July 6,
      2018;

   -- Appellee Reno Housing Authority's answering brief is due on
      August 6, 2018; and

   -- Appellants' optional reply brief is due 21 days after
      service of the answering brief.[BN]

Plaintiffs-Appellants Joaquin Roces, Judith Lopez, Juan Lopez,
Jaime Villa and Melisa Chavez, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, are represented by:

          Joshua D. Buck, Esq.
          Mark Russell Thierman, Esq.
          THIERMAN BUCK, LLP
          7287 Lakeside Drive
          Reno, NV 89511
          Telephone: (775) 284-1500
          Facsimile: (775) 703-5027
          E-mail: josh@thiermanbuck.com
                  mark@thiermanbuck.com

Defendant-Appellee RENO HOUSING AUTHORITY is represented by:

          Stephen S. Kent, Esq.
          KENT LAW, PLLC
          201 West Liberty Street, Suite 320
          Reno, NV 89501
          Telephone: (775) 324-9800
          Facsimile: (775) 324-9803
          E-mail: skent@skentlaw.com

               - and -

          Charles Robert Zeh, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES R. ZEH, ESQ.
          575 Forest Street, Suite 200
          Reno, NV 89509
          Telephone: (775) 323-5700
          Facsimile: (775) 786-8183
          E-mail: crzeh@aol.com


SAFE HAVEN: Atilano Moves to Certify Class of Case Managers
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit titled JOSE ATILANO, individually
and on behalf of all similarly-situated persons v. A SAFE HAVEN
LLC and A SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION, Case No. 1:17-cv-00758 (N.D.
Ill.), asks the Court to conditionally certify a class defined
as:

    "All persons who have been employed by Defendants or their
     predecessors, successors or assigns as Case Managers, Case
     Aides or in other similar job positions at any of
     Defendants' locations and at any time from January 2014
     through and including the present and until final resolution
     of the case."

Mr. Atilano also asks the Court to order the Defendants to
produce contact information of all potential class members,
including names, phone numbers, e-mail addresses and physical
addresses within seven days, and that Notice proceed by U.S.
Mail, e-mail, and a posted notice in an employees-only area
within 14 days.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=VZmTpyBL

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Robin Potter, Esq.
          M. Nieves Bolanos, Esq.
          Patrick Cowlin, Esq.
          POTTER BOLANOS LLC
          111 E. Wacker Dr., Suite 2600
          Chicago, IL 60601
          Telephone: (312) 861-1800
          E-mail: robin@potterlaw.org
                  nieves@potterlaw.org
                  patrick@potterlaw.org


SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO: "Sluder" Suit Transferred to N.D. Ohio
-----------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned Regan Sluder, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. The Sherwin-
Williams Company and The Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company,
USA, Case No. 18-cv-01121 (N.D. Ill., February 13, 2018), was
transferred to U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Ohio on March 15, 2018 under Case No. 18-cv-0060.

Sluder purchased Defendants' Duckback Deck and Dock Elastomeric
Coating and Deck and Dock Solid Coating and SuperDeck Deck and
Dock Coating that peel, crack and bubble once exposed to the
elements.

Sherwin-Williams Company is a multinational company with
subsidiaries that manufacture and market high-performance
coatings, sealants, and specialty chemicals, primarily for
maintenance, repair and improvement applications. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

Edward A. Wallace, Esq.
      Amy E. Keller, Esq.
      WEXLERWALLACE LLP
      55 West Monroe Street, Suite 3300
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Tel: (312) 246-2222
      Fax: (312) 346-0022
      Email: eaw@wexlerwallace.com
             aek@wexlerwallace.com

             - and -


      Gregory F. Coleman, Esq.
      GREG COLEMAN LAW PC
      First Tennessee Plaza
      800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100
      Knoxville, TN 37929
      Tel: (865) 247-0080
      Fax: (865) 522-0049
      Email: greg@gregcolemanlaw.com

             - and -

      Richard L. Miller II, Esq.
      SIPRUT PC
      17 N. State Street, Suite 1600
      Chicago, IL 60602
      Tel: (312) 236-0000
      Fax: (312) 948-9212
      Email: rmiller@siprut.com

Sherwin-Williams Group is represented by:

      Thomas Mark Williams, Esq.
      ULMER & BERNE - CHICAGO
      Ste. 3600, 500 West Madison Street
      Chicago, IL 60661
      Tel: (312) 658-6500
      Fax: (312) 658-6501
      Email: twilliams@ulmer.com


SPACIOUS TECHNOLOGIES: Martinez Sues Over Blind-Unusable Web Site
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PEDRO MARTINEZ, Individually and as the representative of a class
of similarly situated persons v. SPACIOUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
d/b/a Spacious, Case No. 1:18-cv-01871 (E.D.N.Y., March 28,
2018), is a civil rights action brought against Spacious for its
alleged failure to design, construct, maintain, and operate its
Web site -- http://www.Spacious.com/-- to be fully accessible to
and independently usable by the Plaintiff and other blind or
visually-impaired persons.

Spacious Technologies, Inc., is a Delaware foreign business
corporation authorized to do business in New York State.  The
Company owns and operates Spacious Workspaces, which is a place
of public accommodation.  Spacious Workspaces provides to the
public goods and services, such as spaces for doing work and
membership, among other products.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dan Shaked, Esq.
          SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.
          44 Court Street, Suite 1217
          Brooklyn, NY 11201
          Telephone: (917) 373-9128
          E-mail: ShakedLawGroup@Gmail.com


ST. LOUIS RAMS: Seeks 8th Cir. Review of Ruling in "McAllister"
---------------------------------------------------------------
Defendant The St. Louis Rams LLC filed an appeal from a court
ruling in the lawsuit entitled Ronald McAllister, et al. v. The
St. Louis Rams LLC, Case Nos. 4:16-cv-00172-SNLJ, 4:16-cv-00262-
SNLJ, 4:16-cv-00297-SNLJ, in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis.

As reported in the Class Action Reporter on March 20, 2018, the
District Court issued a Memorandum and Order remanding the case
to the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, Missouri.

Plaintiff James Pudlowski filed his first complaint in the State
Court, and the Defendants removed the case to the District Court
citing diversity jurisdiction generally and, in the alternative,
minimal diversity under the Class Action Fairness Act.

The appellate case is captioned as Ronald McAllister, et al. v.
The St. Louis Rams LLC, Case No. 18-8001, in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.[BN]

Plaintiff-Respondent Ronald McAllister, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated, is represented by:

          Anthony S. Bruning, Esq.
          Anthony S. Bruning, Jr., Esq.
          Ryan L. Bruning, Esq.
          Edward Morris Roth, Esq.
          BRUNING LAW FIRM, LLC
          555 Washington Avenue, Suite 600
          Saint Louis, MO 63101
          Telephone: (314) 735-8100
          E-mail: tony@bruninglegal.com
                  aj@bruninglegal.com
                  ryan@bruninglegal.com
                  eroth@bruninglegal.com

               - and -

          Richard Steven Cornfeld, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD S. CORNFELD
          1010 Market Street, Suite 1720
          Saint Louis, MO 63101
          Telephone: (314) 241-5799
          E-mail: rcornfeld@cornfeldlegal.com

               - and -

          Mark C. Goldenberg, Esq.
          Kevin Paul Green, Esq.
          Thomas Paul Rosenfeld, Esq.
          GOLDENBERG HELLER, PC
          2227 S. State, Route 157
          Edwardsville, IL 62025-0000
          Telephone: (618) 656-5150
          E-mail: mark@ghalaw.com
                  kevin@ghalaw.com
                  tom@ghalaw.com

Plaintiffs-Respondents Brad Pearlman and D. McNeely Cochran are
represented by:

          Fernando Bermudez, Esq.
          BERMUDEZ LAW, LLC
          7701 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 950
          St. Louis, MO 63108
          Telephone: (314) 339-3082
          E-mail: bermudez@stlouislaw.com

               - and -

          Martin M. Green, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF MARTIN GREEN, P.C.
          7733 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 700
          Saint Louis, MO 63105
          Telephone: (314) 562-1017

Plaintiffs-Respondents Envision, LLC, Robert D. Bohm, Sue Bohm
and Edward E. Mock are represented by:

          David Richard Bohm, Esq.
          Michael Ryan Cherba, Esq.
          DANNA MCKITRICK, P.C.
          7701 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 800
          Saint Louis, MO 63105
          Telephone: (314) 726-1000
          E-mail: dbohm@dmfirm.com
                  mcherba@dmfirm.com

Plaintiff-Respondent Richard Arnold is represented by:

          Fernando Bermudez, Esq.
          BERMUDEZ LAW, LLC
          7701 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 950
          St. Louis, MO 63108
          Telephone: (314) 339-3082
          E-mail: bermudez@stlouislaw.com

               - and -

          Kevin Paul Green, Esq.
          GOLDENBERG HELLER, PC
          2227 S. State, Route 157
          Edwardsville, IL 62025-0000
          Telephone: (618) 656-5150
          E-mail: kevin@ghalaw.com

Defendant-Petitioner The St. Louis Rams LLC, A Delaware General
Partnership, doing business as St. Louis Rams Partnership, is
represented by:

          Elizabeth Ferrick, Esq.
          Roger K. Heidenreich, Esq.
          Stephen Howard Rovak, Esq.
          Amy E. Sestric, Esq.
          DENTONS US, LLP
          3000 One Metropolitan Square
          211 North Broadway
          Saint Louis, MO 63102-0000
          Telephone: (314) 241-1800
          E-mail: elizabeth.ferrick@snrdenton.com
                  roger.heidenreich@snrdenton.com
                  stephen.rovak@dentons.com
                  amy.sestric@dentons.com


TITLE SOURCE: Class of Staff Appraisers Certified in "Swamy" Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. William Alsup denied the Plaintiff's motion for
conditional certification pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards
Act in the lawsuit titled SOM SWAMY, on behalf of himself and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. TITLE SOURCE, INC.,
Case No. 3:17-cv-01175-WHA (N.D. Cal.).

Mr. Swamy's motion for class certification is granted in part and
denied in part.  This class is certified:

     All persons employed by Title Source as an External Staff
     Appraiser in California at any time from March 7, 2013,
     through the present.

This class definition shall apply for all purposes, including
settlement, Judge Alsup opines.  Plaintiff Som Swamy is appointed
as class representative and his counsel from Kennedy Hodges, LLP,
are appointed as class counsel.

By April 13 at noon, the parties shall jointly submit a proposal
for class notification with a plan to distribute notice --
including by first-class mail -- by April 30.  In crafting their
joint proposal, Judge Alsup says, counsel shall please keep in
mind the undersigned judge's guidelines for notice to class
members in the "Notice Regarding Factors to be Evaluated for Any
Proposed Class Settlement."

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=bR8w0CqM


TRANSAMERICA LIFE: Appeals "Feller" Suit Cert. Order to 9th Cir.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Defendant Transamerica Life Insurance Company filed an appeal
from a court ruling in the lawsuit styled Gordon Feller, et al.
v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company, Case No. 2:16-cv-01378-
CAS-GJS, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California, Los Angeles.

The appellate case is captioned as Gordon Feller, et al. v.
Transamerica Life Insurance Company, Case No. 18-55408, in the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter, Transamerica
filed a sealed appeal from a court ruling in the lawsuit.  That
appellate case is captioned as Gordon Feller, et al. v.
Transamerica Life Insurance Co., Case No. 17-80257.

The Honorable Christina A. Snyder previously granted the
Plaintiffs' motion for class certification certifying these Class
and Subclasses:

   * National Class:

     All persons who own an in-force Policy for which the MDR
     increase imposed by Transamerica beginning August 1, 2015,
     has resulted or will result in higher Monthly Deduction
     charges than those applicable under the rate schedule in
     effect before that date.

   * California Subclass:

     All California residents who own an in-force Policy for
     which the MDR increase imposed by Transamerica beginning
     August 1, 2015, has resulted or will result in higher
     Monthly Deduction charges than those applicable under the
     rate schedule in effect before that date.

   * California Senior Subclass:

     All California residents who own an in-force Policy for
     which the MDR increase imposed by Transamerica beginning
     August 1, 2015, has resulted or will result in higher
     Monthly Deduction charges than those applicable under the
     rate schedule in effect before that date, and who were age
     65 or older when the MDR increase was imposed on them.

The briefing schedule in the Appellate Case is set as follows:

   -- Transcript must be ordered by April 26, 2018;

   -- Transcript is due on May 29, 2018;

   -- Appellant Transamerica Life Insurance Company's opening
      brief is due on July 5, 2018;

   -- Appellees Gordon Feller, Mary Feller, Andrew Kriegman,
      Gerald R. Lyons, Eric Schneck, Gail Thompson, Clarence E.
      White and Donna M. White's answering brief is due on
      August 6, 2018; and

   -- Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after
      service of the answering brief.[BN]

Plaintiffs-Appellees GORDON FELLER, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated; MARY FELLER, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated; ERIC SCHNECK, as trustee for the
Burton I. Schneck Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust dated
2/24/1997, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated; ANDREW KRIEGMAN, as trustee for the Adrienne L. Hendler
Revocable Trust dated 6/4/1993, the Elizabeth Kriegman Revocable
Trust dated 6/8/1993, and the Patricia Sokolow Revocable Trust
dated 6/4/1993; GERALD R. LYONS, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated; DONNA M. WHITE, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated; CLARENCE E. WHITE, on behalf
of himself and all others similarly situated; and GAIL THOMPSON,
individually and as Power of Attorney for Lois Thompson, on
behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, are
represented by:

          Stephen R. Basser, Esq.
          Samuel M. Ward, Esq.
          BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE
          600 West Broadway
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 230-0800
          Facsimile: (619) 230-1874
          E-mail: sbasser@barrack.com
                  sward@barrack.com

               - and -

          Travis Murray Corby, I, Esq.
          SHERNOFF BIDART ECHEVERRIA, LLP
          3101 N Canon Drive
          Beverly Hills, CA 90210
          Telephone: (310) 246-0503
          E-mail: tcorby@shernoff.com

               - and -

          William M. Shernoff, Esq.
          SHERNOFF BIDART ECHEVERRIA, LLP
          600 S. Indian Hill Blvd.
          Claremont, CA 91711-5498
          Telephone: (909) 621-4935
          Facsimile: (909) 447-2043
          E-mail: wshernoff@shernoff.com

               - and -

          Andrew S. Friedman, Esq.
          BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C.
          2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 300
          Phoenix, AZ 85016
          Telephone: (602) 274-1100
          E-mail: afriedman@bffb.com

               - and -

          Allison Hughes Goddard, Esq.
          James Richard Patterson, Esq.
          PATTERSON LAW GROUP, APC
          402 West Broadway
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 398-4762
          Facsimile: (619) 756-6991
          E-mail: ali@pattersonlawgroup.com
                  jim@pattersonlawgroup.com

               - and -

          Harvey Rosenfield, Esq.
          CONSUMER WATCHDOG
          2701 Ocean Park Blvd.
          Santa Monica, CA 90405
          Telephone: (310) 392-0522
          Facsimile: (310) 392-8874
          E-mail: harvey@consumerwatchdog.org

Defendant-Appellant TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY is
represented by:

          Dan Marmalefsky, Esq.
          Nancy R. Thomas, Esq.
          MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
          707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 6000
          Los Angeles, CA 90017
          Telephone: (213) 892-5809
          Facsimile: (213) 892-5454
          E-mail: dmarmalefsky@mofo.com
                  nthomas@mofo.com

               - and -

          Joseph R. Palmore, Esq.
          MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
          2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
          Washington, DC 20006
          Telephone: (202) 887-1500
          E-mail: jpalmore@mofo.com

               - and -

          James Sigel, Esq.
          MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
          425 Market Street
          San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
          Telephone: (202) 887-6948
          E-mail: jsigel@mofo.com


UNITED STATES: Court Certifies Classes in Guam Contractors Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood granted the Plaintiffs'
motion for class certification and denied their motion to strike
the Defendants, opposition to certification in the lawsuit styled
GUAM CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, et al. v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS,
III, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Case No.
1:16-cv-00075 (D. Guam).

Jefferson B. Sessions is the Attorney General of the United
States.

The Court certifies these class and subclasses:

     Petitioners who have filed or will file an I-129 application
     for H-2B workers for Guam under one of the following two
     categories:

     1. Peakload need (the "Peakload Subclass); or

     2. One-Time Occurrence (the "One-Time Occurrence Subclass")

     And who have received or will receive a denial of such I-129
     application based on a finding that the Petitioner is unable
     to demonstrate "temporary need."

Attorney Jeff Joseph, Esq., counsel for the named plaintiffs, is
appointed as class counsel.

Judge Tydingco-Gatewood directs the parties to confer with
respect to the proposed notice to class members required by Rule
23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  The Plaintiffs shall
file a proposed notice no later than April 30, 2018.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=9ZJxF6q1


UNIVERSAL TAX: Wins Summary Judgment in Suit Filed by D&B II
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer granted the Defendant's motion for
summary judgment in the lawsuit titled D&B II ENTERPRISES LLC
d/b/a BAIN ACCOUNTING/TAX, on behalf of itself and all other
similarly situated v. UNIVERSAL TAX SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a CCH SMALL
FIRM SERVICES, Case No. 1:13-cv-05702 (N.D. Ill.).

The Plaintiff's motion to reconsider the dismissal of the fraud
claims is denied, and Plaintiff's motion for class certification
is stricken as moot.

D&B II Enterprises, LLC bought computer software from Universal
Tax Systems, Inc., for the purpose of preparing and filing
customers' tax returns.  The software suffered from numerous
performance problems, and the Plaintiff sued the Defendant for
fraud.

After Judge James Block Zagel, to whom this case was assigned,
dismissed the fraud counts, the Plaintiff added several contract
and quasi-contract claims and moved to certify a class of
persons, who purchased the relevant software for the 2012 tax
year, according to the Court's memorandum opinion and order.  The
Defendant has moved for summary judgment.

A copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=WxNQIpP4


VISUAL COMPUTER: Sent Unsolicited SMS Ads, "Levin" Suit Says
------------------------------------------------------------
Lawrence Levin, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Visual Computer Solutions,
Inc., Defendant, Case No. 18-cv-03631 (D. N.J., March 15, 2018),
seeks an injunction requiring the Defendant to cease all
unsolicited text messaging activities and an award of statutory
damages together with costs and reasonable attorneys' fees for
violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Defendant sent autodialed text messages to Levin's cellular
telephones in an attempt to solicit business and promote their
scheduling software solutions using svcsapps@vcssoftware.com
without oral or written prior express consent of the Plaintiff.
[BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Ross Howard Schmierer, Esq.
      DENITTIS OSEFCHEN PRINCE PC
      315 Madison Avenue 3rd Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Tel: (646) 979-3642
      Email: rschmierer@denittislaw.com


WAL-MART STORES: Mislabels Glucosamine Supplements, Parker Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CYNTHIA PARKER, REBA GARTH, MARGARET HERRIN, and SHIRLEY
REINHARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Case No. 4:18-cv-00465-JAR
(E.D. Mo., March 28, 2018), alleges that the Defendant sells its
glucosamine products with false and misleading labeling in an
effort to dupe consumers into purchasing a questionable
supplement for prices that exceed its true value.

Wal-Mart is among the world's largest specialty retailers of
dietary supplements.

The Plaintiffs assert that the Defendant promises consumers on
its Web site and its supplement labeling that its supplement's
ingredients are effective for the purposes for which they are
sold.  The Plaintiffs contend that the Defendant breaks that
promise and repeatedly violates federal and state law by selling
glucosamine supplements with mislabeled ingredients, identifying
their contents as glucosamine sulfate, when in fact the
supplements contain glucosamine hydrochloride and potassium
sulfate, less expensive ingredients with no proven efficacy.

Wal-Mart is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of
business in Bentonville, Arkansas.  The Defendant markets,
distributes and sells the Wal-Mart Products throughout the United
States, including in Florida, Missouri, Tennessee and
Wisconsin.[BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Eric S. Johnson, Esq.
          Paul J. Hanly, Jr., Esq.
          Mitchell M. Breit, Esq.
          SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC
          112 Madison Avenue
          New York, NY 10016-7416
          Telephone: (212) 784-6400
          Facsimile: (212) 213-5949
          E-mail: ejohnson@simmonsfirm.com
                  phanly@simmonsfirm.com
                  mbreit@simmonsfirm.com

               - and -

          Gregory F. Coleman, Esq.
          Mark E. Silvey, Esq.
          Adam A. Edwards, Esq.
          Lisa A. White, Esq.
          GREG COLEMAN LAW PC
          First Tennessee Plaza
          800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100
          Knoxville, TN 37929
          Telephone: (865) 247-0080
          Facsimile: (865) 533-0049
          E-mail: greg@gregcolemanlaw.com
                  mark@gregcolemanlaw.com
                  adam@gregcolemanlaw.com
                  lisa@gregcolemanlaw.com


WALGREEN CO: Court Grants Class Cert. in Washtenaw Retirees Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Sharon Johnson Coleman granted the Plaintiffs' motion
for class certification in the lawsuit styled WASHTENAW COUNTY
EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All
Others Similarly Situated v. WALGREEN CO., GREGORY D. WASSON, and
WADE MIQUELON, Case No. 1:15-cv-03187 (N.D. Ill.).

Industriens Pensionforsikring A/S, acting as lead plaintiff on
behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, brings this
class action against Defendants Walgreen Co., former Walgreens
CEO Gregory D. Wasson, and former Walgreens CFO Wade Miquelon,
alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

The class period, which runs from March to August 2014,
encompasses the announcement of Walgreens second quarter results
and third quarter results and public statements made in the
interim.  During that time, the Defendants continued to issue
statements that allegedly downplayed the risk to the earnings
before interest and taxes ("EBIT") goal and failed to acknowledge
the impact of systematic generic drug price inflation, according
to the Court's memorandum opinion and order.

Although the Plaintiffs initially sought to pursue a number of
claims, Judge Coleman notes, their claims were narrowed by a
motion to dismiss and now concern a period from March 25 to
August 6, 2014, during which the Defendants purportedly concealed
or failed to fully disclose the impact of generic drug price
inflation and reimbursement pressures.

A copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=BwoV29Fq


WERNER ENTERPRISES: Eighth Circuit Appeal Filed in "Petrone" Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs Philip Petrone, et al., filed an appeal from the
District Court's Memorandum & Order entered on February 9, 2018,
in their lawsuits styled Philip Petrone, et al. v. Werner
Enterprises, Inc., et al., Case Nos. 8:11-cv-00401-LSC and 8:12-
cv-00307-LSC, in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Nebraska - Omaha.

The appellate case is captioned as Philip Petrone, et al. v.
Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al., Case No. 18-1647, in the United
States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

As reported in the Class Action Reporter on March 2, 2018, a
class of student drivers' attempt at a new trial in a class
action against Werner Enterprises has been denied.

In May 2017, a federal jury in Nebraska awarded nearly $780,000
to Werner student drivers who weren't paid for rest breaks of 20
minutes or less.  However, the class asked that the judgment be
altered or amended, arguing that the jury's verdict was based on
an erroneous legal standard. Specifically, the student drivers
were requesting a partial judgment "as to the compensability of
sleeper berth time" or a partial new trial.  The plaintiffs
sought almost $2.2 million in attorney's fees, as well as about
$200,000 in nontaxable costs and $10,000 each for the named
plaintiffs.

The Nebraska federal judge didn't grant a new trial, saying
"there has been no miscarriage of justice that justifies amending
the judgement and/or granting a new trial."

Instead, the Plaintiffs were awarded $337,293 in attorney's fees,
$133,276 in nontaxable costs and expenses, and $10,000 for each
of the four named plaintiffs.

The class is made up of more than 50,000 student drivers from
August 2008 until Aug. 1, 2014.

The briefing schedule in the Appellate Case is set as follows:

   -- Transcript is due on or before May 7, 2018;

   -- Appendix is due on May 7, 2018;

   -- Brief of Appellants Philip Petrone, et al., is due on
      May 17, 2018; and

   -- Appellee/Cross Appellant brief due 30 days from the date
      the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the
      appellant's brief.[BN]

Plaintiff-Appellee Philip Petrone, on behalf of themselves and
all those similarly situated, is represented by:

          Joseph L. Messa, Jr., Esq.
          MESSA & ASSOCIATES
          123 S. 22nd Street
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Telephone: (215) 568-3500
          E-mail: jmessa@messalaw.com

               - and -

          Richard S. Swartz, Esq.
          SWARTZ SWIDLER, LLC
          1101 Kings Highway, N., Suite 402
          Cherry Hill, NJ 08034
          Telephone: (856) 685-7420
          E-mail: rswartz@swartz-legal.com

Plaintiffs-Appellees Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir
Singh, Brian Pankz, Jason Dewayne Gunn, Ahmad Abdinasir, Adam F.
Akhalu, Latoshia Denise Anderson, Derek C. Anglero, Alan Blane
Arthur, Christopher Ayala, Timothy McCabe Bailey, Csaba G.
Barabas, Henry Barentine, Joseph E. Barker, Diego Barraza,
Richard Clair Bash, Terry Lee Batko, Elizabeth Baumgartel, Jeremy
Alfred Bennett, Gary M. Bernstine, Stacy Lynn Bluebird, Rafarel
K. Boadu, Damien Marcus Boyer, Christina Bradley, Elias Bratcher,
Justin Bristol, Karl Matthew Emerson, Scott A. Larrow, Steve N.
Neely, Tonya McDonald, Micheal Anthony Brooks, Nicholas Brown,
Olivia Bryant, Lawrence F. Bunkowski, David Burgess, Steven Dale
Burgess, Justin Burkholder, Richard Calvert, Johnny Carter, Brett
Carty, Joel Castaneda-Dominguez, Lawrence Edward Cecil, Issac
Houston Chase, Victor Chavarria, Paul Cleaver, Larry Nathaniel
Clinton, Jr., et al., are represented by:

          Joshua S. Boyette, Esq.
          Justin L. Swidler, Esq.
          SWARTZ SWIDLER, LLC
          1101 Kings Highway, N., Suite 402
          Cherry Hill, NJ 08034
          Telephone: (856) 685-7420
          E-mail: jboyette@swartz-legal.com
                  jswidler@swartz-legal.com

               - and -

          Thomas N. Sweeney, Esq.
          MESSA & ASSOCIATES
          123 S. 22nd Street
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Telephone: (215) 568-3500
          E-mail: tsweeney@messalaw.com

Defendants-Appellants Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as
Werner Trucking, and Drivers Management, LLC, are represented by:

          Patrick Joseph Barrett, Esq.
          Elizabeth A. Culhane, Esq.
          Joseph Edward Jones, Esq.
          FRASER STRYKER PC LLO
          500 Energy Plaza
          409 S. 17th Street
          Omaha, NE 68102-2663
          Telephone: (402) 341-6000
          E-mail: pbarrett@fraserstryker.com
                  eculhane@fraserstryker.com
                  jjones@fraserstryker.com


WILLIAMS PEST: "Adams" Suit Alleges FLSA Violations
---------------------------------------------------
Cheryl Adams, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Williams Pest Control, LLC and Lawrence F. Williams,
Case No. 6:18-cv-00135 (E.D. Tex., March 20, 2018), seeks to
recover unpaid overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Plaintiff Cheryl Adams is a resident of Chandler, Texas.
Plaintiff was employed as a scheduling coordinator for
Defendants.

Defendant Williams Pest Control, LLC dba Williams Pest Control is
a Texas limited liability company doing business in the state of
Texas with its principal place of business at 1428 S. Third
Street, Mabank, Texas 75147. Defendants provides pest control
solutions. [BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      William S. Hommel Jr., Esq.
      HOMMEL LAW FIRM
      1404 Rice Road, Suite 200
      Tyler, TX 75703
      Tel: (903) 596-7100
      Fax: (469) 533-1618


WIPRO LTD: "Phillips" Suit Transferred to S.D. Tex.
---------------------------------------------------
The case captioned James Phillips and Robert Saemian, Plaintiffs,
v. Wipro Limited, Defendant, Case No. 17-cv-06893, (N.D. Cal.,
December 1, 2017), was transferred to the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District Of Texas on March 15, 2018 under Case No.
18-cv-00821.

Plaintiffs seek declaratory, injunctive, and other equitable
relief, compensatory and punitive damages, including prejudgment
and post-judgment interest, attorneys' fees, and costs to redress
Wipro's pervasive pattern and practice of discrimination in
violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Wipro is an Indian company that provides information technology
and consulting services and is alleged of favoring South Asians
and those of Indian national origin with regards to hiring,
promotion and termination decisions. [BN]

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Daniel Low, Esq.
      KOTCHEN & LOW LLP
      1745 Kalorama Road NW, Suite 101
      Washington, DC 20009
      Telephone: (202) 471-1995
      Email: dlow@kotchen.com

Wipro, Ltd. is represented by:

      Eric Michael Lloyd, Esq.
      SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
      560 Mission Street, Suite 3100
      San Francisco, CA 94105
      Tel: (415) 544-1060
      Fax: (415) 397-8549
      Email: elloyd@seyfarth.com

             - and -

      David J. Rowland, Esq.
      SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
      233 S Wacker Drive, Ste. 8000
      Chicago, IL 60606
      Tel: (312) 460-5817
      Email: drowland@seyfarth.com


WYANDOT COUNTY, OH: Mulvaine Seeks to Recover OT Pay for EMTs
-------------------------------------------------------------
TAMMY MULVAINE, On behalf of herself, and those Similarly
situated v. WYANDOT COUNTY EMS, Case No. 3:18-cv-00703 (N.D.
Ohio, March 28, 2018), accuses the Defendant of failing to
compensate its hourly Emergency Medical Technicians with overtime
pay, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.

Wyandot County EMS is an agency of Wyandot County, which provides
emergency medical and other lifesaving services to the residents
of Wyandot County.  The Defendant employs more than one dozen
EMTs in both full and part time capacities, and is a "public
agency" covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act.[BN]

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          John S. Marshall, Esq.
          Edward R. Forman, Esq.
          Samuel M. Schlein, Esq.
          MARSHALL AND FORMAN LLC
          250 Civic Center Dr., Suite 480
          Columbus, OH 43215-5296
          Telephone: (614) 463-9790
          Facsimile: (614) 463-9780
          E-mail: jmarshall@marshallforman.com
                  eforman@marshallforman.com
                  sschlein@marshallforman.com

               - and -

          Louis A. Jacobs, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF LOUIS JACOBS
          177 19th St., Apt. 9C
          Oakland, CA 94612
          Telephone: (614) 203-1255
          Facsimile: (510) 250-9007
          E-mail: LAJOhio@aol.com


ZOCDOC INC: "Alfano" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
----------------------------------------------------------
Margaret Alfano and Shaan Kastuar, on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly situated v. ZocDoc, Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-
02558  (S.D. N.Y., March 22, 2018), seeks to recover unpaid
overtime compensation and other wages under the Fair Labor
Standards Act and the New York Labor Law.

The Plaintiff Margaret Alfano is a resident of the County of San
Francisco, State of California. The Plaintiff was employed by the
Defendant as an inside salesperson in New York.

The Plaintiff Shaan Kastuar is a resident of the County of
Middlesex, State of New Jersey.  The Plaintiff was employed by
the Defendant as an inside salesperson in New York.

The Defendant ZocDoc, Inc. does business in the State of New
York, within the Southern District of New York, maintaining its
principle place of business at 568 Broadway, New York, New
York 10012. [BN]

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

      Troy L. Kessler, Esq.
      Marijana Matura, Esq.
      SHULMAN KESSLER LLP
      534 Broadhollow Road, Suite 275
      Melville, NY 11747
      Tel: (631) 499-9100


ZODIAC US: Cuzick Seeks Final Approval of $952,000 Settlement
-------------------------------------------------------------
Kyle Cuzick moves the Court for an order granting final approval
of the joint stipulation of settlement and release reached by the
parties of the lawsuit titled KYLE CUZICK, on behalf of himself,
and all others similarly situated v. ZODIAC U.S. SEAT SHELLS,
LLC, et al., Case No. 4:16-cv-03793-HSG (N.D. Cal.).

For settlement purposes, the Settlement Class is defined as:

     all individuals who are or who have been employed by
     Defendant in California as a nonexempt employee during any
     portion of the Settlement Class Period (the period from
     May 25, 2012, through the date of preliminary approval).

Mr. Cuzick asks the Court to grant final approval of the terms of
the Stipulation, including the amount of the settlement; the
amount of distributions to class members; the procedure for
giving notice to class members; the procedure for opting out of
the settlement; and the amounts allocated to the enhancement
payments and attorney's fees and costs.  He also asks the Court
to appoint him as representative for the Settlement Class and to
appoint Setareh Law Group as counsel for the Settlement Class.

The Defendant agrees that $952,000, known as the "Maximum
Settlement Amount," represents the maximum amount that it will
pay out under the Stipulation, inclusive of: (a) payments to
Participating Class Members; (b) the maximum gross amount for
Class Counsel's attorneys' fees; (c) the maximum gross amount for
all of Class Counsel's and the Class Representative's litigation
costs and associated expenses, which is $10,000; (d) the
anticipated gross amount for claims administration costs; (e) the
maximum gross amount for the enhancement payments to be made by
Zodiac to the Class Representative, which is a maximum $10,000;
(f) the maximum gross amount for payment to the California Labor
Workforce Development Agency as part of the consideration for the
release of all Released Claims under PAGA, which is $10,000; and
(g) all payroll Taxes.

The Class Counsel will not seek an amount greater than $317,333
for attorneys' fees.  The Class Counsel will not seek an amount
greater than $10,000 for litigation costs.  The Class
representative enhancement award requested will be $10,000.

The Court will commence a hearing on May 10, 2018, at 2:00 p.m.,
to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=RDTeayDn

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Shaun Setareh, Esq.
          H. Scott Leviant, Esq.
          SETAREH LAW GROUP
          9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907
          Beverly Hills, CA 90212
          Telephone: (310) 888-7771
          Facsimile: (310) 888-0109
          E-mail: shaun@setarehlaw.com
                  scott@setarehlaw.com





                            *********


S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Marion Alcestis A. Castillon, Jessenius Pulido, Noemi Irene A.
Adala, Rousel Elaine T. Fernandez, Joy A. Agravante, Psyche
Maricon Castillon-Lopez, Julie Anne L. Toledo, Christopher G.
Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.



                 * * *  End of Transmission  * * *