CAR_Public/161004.mbx              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

             Tuesday, October 4, 2016, Vol. 18, No. 198




                            Headlines


3M CORP: "Davis et al." File Suit Over Health Hazards of PFCs
ADVANCE DIABETIC: Steven Conner Seeks Certify FDCPA Class
AIR CANADA: Faces Class Action Over Checked Bag Fee
ALLEN COUNTY, IN: Jordan Seeks Certification of Prisoners Class
AMERICAN MEDICAL: Faces "Diaz" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA

ANNELLIE'S CAR: Faces "Faine" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
ASIAN SUPERMARKET: Class Certification Sought in "Huang" Suit
BAKER HUGHES: "Ross" Suit Alleges Misclassification of Employees
BARCLAYS BANK: Faces "Chung" Suit in Southern Dist. of California
BRASSERIE CENTRAL: "Manzo" Suit Moved from Cir. Ct. to S.D. Fla.

BUCKEYE CHECK: Illinois Court Terminates "Saenz" FDCPA Class Suit
CACAO EXPRESS: Faces "Milo" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
CANNERY CASINO: Yanchak Seeks to Certify Table Game Dealers Class
CAREPOINT MEDICAL: Steven Conner Seeks to Certify FDCPA Class
CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OR: Faces "Abraham" Suit in Dist. of Oregon

COMENITY CAPITAL: Faces "Chung" Suit in S.D. of California
DA DAVIDSON COS: Parties Seeks OK of "Monaco" Class Settlement
DANNYS ATHENS: Faces "Martinez" Suit in S.D. of New York
DAS TRUCKING: Faces "Jones" Suit Seeking Overtime Pay Under FLSA
DESIGNED RECEIVABLE: Goodson's Bid to Certify Under Submission

EASTMAN CHEMICAL: Proposed Class Action Settlement Announced
FEARON ET AL.: Faces "Graham" Suit in Northern District of Ohio
FIAT CHRYSLER: Securities Class Action Lawsuit Filed in Mich.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS: Certification of Class Sought in "Waters" Suit
GOOGLE INC: Gmail Privacy Class Action Lawsuit Trimmed

GREYFOX UTIITY: Faces "O'Brien" Lawsuit Under FLSA, Ohio Wage Act
GRK 451: Faces "Vasquez" Lawsuit Under FLSA, NY Labor Law
HULCHER SERVICES: "Stagner" Suit Seeks to Recoup Pay Under FLSA
INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT: Faces "Richardson" Suit in Ca. Super. Ct.
ISORAY INC: Inks Deal to Settle Shareholder Class Action Suit

ITT EDUCATIONAL: "Mosele" Lawsuit Seeks Redress Under WARN Act
JOHNSON & JOHNSON: Canadians File Talcum Powder Class Action
JP MORGAN: Faces "Barrow" Suit in Northern District of Georgia
KATE SPADE: Faces "Irvine" Suit Over Alleged False Advertising
LANGSTON CONSTRUCTION: Mairena-Rivera Seeks Class Certification

LENDER LEGAL: Faces "Galvin" Suit in Middle District of Florida
LIBERTY ACTION: Faces Class Action Over Trump Donation Ads
LOOMIS ARMORED: "Gomez et al." Seek Overtime Wage Under FLSA
LOS ANGELES, CA: Yagman's Bid to Certify Taken Under Submission
M&M BEDDING: Faces "Ellingsen" Lawsuit Under FLSA, Md. Labor Laws

MBF INSPECTION: Ohio Court Certifies FLSA Class in "Ganci" Suit
MCKEE FOODS: "Vargas" Suit Alleges Misclassification of Drivers
MGT CAPITAL: Faces "Exley" Suit Over Planned Acquisitions
MGT CAPITAL: Bronstein Gewirtz Files Securities Class Suit
MISONIX INC: "Scalfani" Lawsuit Alleges Securities Act Violation

MT. JULIET, TN: "Stafford" Suit Seeks Overtime Pay Under FLSA
NATIONAL FOOTBALL: Dismissal of Super Bowl Seating Suit Upheld
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE: 6th Cir. Sides w/ Plaintiffs in Class Suits
NIANTIC INC: Faces Increasing Trespassing Lawsuits
PIONEER CREDIT: Faces "Harty" Suit in Western Dist. of New York

RAYMOURS FURNITURE: Class Action Waivers Enforceability Affirmed
SANTA CLARA, CA: Class of Prisoners Certified in "Chavez" Suit
SIRIUSXM CANADA: Says Aware of 'Class Action' Threats
SONY COMPUTER: Reaches Proposed Settlement on PS3 Class Action
SOUTHERN OHIO MEDICAL: Faces "Hamm" Suit Under FLSA, OH Wage Act

STAR BRITE: Faces "Leal" Suit in Eastern District of New York
TACONIC PLASTICS: Hit With Class Action Over PFOA Contamination
TOTAL CARD: Faces "Judah" Suit in District of New Jersey
TROJAN HORSE: Class of Plan Participants Certified in Longo Suit
UNITED STATES: H-1B Visa Lottery Case to Move Forward

UNITED TECHNOLOGIES: Cotromano Seeks Property Owners Class Cert.
UNIVERSAL TAX: D&B Suit Transferred from N.D. Ill. to S.D. Ga.
US INSTALLATION: Court OKs Settlement Agreement in "Meyer" Suit
WAL-MART STORES: Court Certifies Investors Class in Pontiac Suit
WASHINGTON STATE: Court Dismisses Overdraft Class Action Suit

WELLS FARGO: Faces "Mitchel" Class Suit in Utah
WELLS FARGO: Ex-Worker Files Class Action Over Forced Resignation
WEST AUSTRALIA: May Face Class Action Over 'Slavery' Claims
WHITEWAVE FOODS: Retirement System Files Suit Over Sale to Danone
YAHOO INC: Faces "Myers" Suit Over Theft of Users' Account Infos

YAHOO INC: Faces 3 Consumer Class Complaints Over Data Breach
YIRENDAI LTD: Lundin Firm Files Securities Class Action Lawsuit



                            *********

3M CORP: "Davis et al." File Suit Over Health Hazards of PFCs
-------------------------------------------------------------
ALAN DAVIS and LESLIE DAVIS; DONALD EASTER and THERESA EASTER;
BILLY LONG and LINDA LONG; JOYCE MOORE; LONNIE ROUSER, SR.; and
RHONDA SHARKEY, individually, and on behalf of all others
similarly situated Plaintiff v. THE 3M CORPORATION (f/k/a
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), THE ANSUL COMPANY,
ANGUS FIRE, NATIONAL FOAM, BUCKEYE FIRE PROTECTION CO., CHEMGUARD,
Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-02394-RM-MEH (D. Col., September 22,
2016), alleges that Defendants acted with negligence, gross
negligence, and/or willful, wanton, and careless disregard for the
health, safety, and property of Plaintiffs by their use or
production of perfluorinated chemicals.

THE 3M CORPORATION -- http://www.3m.com/-- conducts operations in
electronics, telecommunications, industrial, consumer and office,
health care, safety, and other markets.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     Hunter Shkolnik, Esq.
     Paul J. Napoli, Esq.
     Louise Caro, Esq.
     NAPOLI SHKOLNIK PLLC
     360 Lexington Avenue, Eleventh Floor
     New York, NY, 10017
     Phone: (212) 397-1000
     E-mail: hunter@napolilaw.com
             pnapoli@napolilaw.com
             lcaro@napolilaw.com

        - and -

     Michael W. McDivitt, Esq.
     MCDIVITT LAW FIRM
     19 E. Cimarron Street
     Colorado Springs, CO 80903
     Phone: (719) 471-3700
     E-mail: mmcdivitt@mcdivittlaw.com


ADVANCE DIABETIC: Steven Conner Seeks Certify FDCPA Class
---------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned STEVEN A. CONNER, DPM,
P.C., individually and on behalf of the class defined herein v.
ADVANCE DIABETIC SOLUTIONS, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10, Case No. 2:16-
cv-01437-AJS (W.D. Pa.), seeks certification of this class, or, in
the alternative, a stay of briefing on class certification:

     All persons (1) who, on or after a date four years prior to
     the filing of this action (28 U.S.C. Section 1658), (2) were
     sent faxes by or on behalf of defendant Advance Diabetic
     Solutions, LLC, promoting its goods or services for sale (3)
     and which did not contain an opt out notice as described in
     47 U.S.C. Section 227.

Steven A. Conner, DPM, P.C., brought the action after receiving
unsolicited advertising faxes sent by the Defendant, in violation
of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The Plaintiff further asks that it be appointed class
representative and that Edelman, Combs, Lattumer & Goodwin, LLC
and Shenkan Injury Lawyers, LLC, be appointed counsel for the
class.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=DCHxDAY9

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Richard Shenkan, Esq.
          SHENKAN INJURY LAWYERS, LLC
          6550 Lakeshore Street
          West Bloomfield, MI 48323
          Telephone: (248) 562-1320
          Facsimile: (888) 769-1774
          E-mail: rshenkan@shenkanlaw.com

               - and -

          Daniel A. Edelman, Esq.
          Dulijaza (Julie) Clark, Esq.
          EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER GOODWIN, L.L.C.
          20 S. Clark Street, Suite 1500
          Chicago, IL 60603
          Telephone: (312) 739-4200
          Facsimile: (312) 419-0379
          E-mail: dedelman@edcombs.com
                  jclark@edcombs.com


AIR CANADA: Faces Class Action Over Checked Bag Fee
---------------------------------------------------
Sophia Harris, writing for CBC News, reports that a proposed class
action lawsuit alleges that Air Canada and WestJet "colluded to
fix the price" and introduce a charge for a first checked bag fee
within days of each other.

The suit also plans to claim that the added charge has "unjustly
enriched" the two airlines, because it comes with no extra
service.

"It doesn't seem fair and it doesn't seem right," says Lorne
Hoedel, a Regina resident and the lead plaintiff in the proposed
lawsuit.

In 2014, both Air Canada and WestJet introduced a $25 charge for
the first piece of checked luggage for economy passengers on
domestic and other flights within North America.

The suit was filed in September 2016 at the Court of Queen's Bench
for Saskatchewan. The proposed class action will include all
Canadian passengers who paid either airline the fee while taking
domestic or U.S. flights after October 29, 2014.

The case will only proceed if it is certified by the Saskatchewan
court.

Checked bag 'collusion'?

A lawyer for the plaintiff alleges the country's two largest
airlines "colluded," claiming WestJet publicly announced its
checked bag fee plans as a way to invite Air Canada to follow
along, which it did.

"It's a wink, wink, we'll get together and do the same thing,"
says lawyer Tony Merchant with Merchant Law in Regina, which filed
the suit.

On Sept. 15, 2014, WestJet announced its new $25 checked bag
charge. Air Canada made its announcement just three days later, on
Sept. 18. WestJet starting charging the fee the following month,
days before Air Canada did.

"As soon as they had the announcement from WestJet, then they
acted," says Merchant of Air Canada's moves. "We think we can
establish they were acting in concert."

The suit also claims that, because the two airlines dominate the
market, they can impose the luggage charge "without any worthy
competition to keep them in check."

Both Air Canada and WestJet declined to comment on the suit to CBC
News.

Perfectly normal?

The collusion argument doesn't fly with Calgary aviation analyst
Rick Erickson. He believes Air Canada simply reacted quickly to
WestJet's news and says that's the way many industries operate.

"You watch what your competitors are doing and, by and large, you
emulate it," says Erickson. "[Even] if it's not a great thing for
the customer, sometimes these decisions still get made."

He also notes that many American airlines introduced the first
checked bag fee long before Air Canada and WestJet adopted it.

A class action lawsuit has also been launched in the U.S.,
targeting the fee in that country.

It alleges that American carriers Delta and AirTran Airways
colluded to impose a $15 first checked bag charge which was
announced by the two airlines within days of each other in 2008.

The suit was certified in court last year.

Checked bag profits

The proposed Canadian class action also alleges that Air Canada
and WestJet have profited from the baggage charge, while providing
nothing more for customers.

"It kind of rips me off and that's why I decided to pursue this,"
says plaintiff Hoedel. He first had to pay the $25 fee twice in
July 2015 when he flew a round trip on WestJet from Regina to
Toronto to attend a wedding.

Since then, Hoedel recalls he's had to pay the charge a couple
more times with Air Canada, totaling $100 in all.

He wants his money back. The lawsuit seeks to get back "every
nickel" the two airlines got for this charge, says Merchant.

Erickson admits he's no fan of the fee. But he says charging for
something that was once included in the airfare is simply standard
airline industry practice these days.

"They used to offer free meals and now they charge. Now all the
good seats have prices on them," says Erickson.

"The airlines have very carefully sliced and diced all of their
product offerings. That's how business gets done these days, like
it or not."


ALLEN COUNTY, IN: Jordan Seeks Certification of Prisoners Class
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit titled ROLANDO JORDAN, RONALD WARD,
and KENNETH ROLLINGCLOUD, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. DAVID GLADIEUX, ALAN COOK, and CHARLES HART,
Case No. 1:16-cv-00335-TLS-SLC (N.D. Ind.), ask the Court to
certify a class defined as:

     All individuals held at the Allen County Jail between
     October 2014 and September 2016 practicing a Muslim or
     traditional Native American faith who have been forbidden
     from engaging in Muslim or traditional Native American
     communal worship and/or have been forbidden from keeping an
     article of Muslim or traditional Native American religious
     devotion.

In their complaint, the Plaintiffs -- the proposed representatives
of the Class -- challenge the alleged unlawful and
unconstitutional religious discrimination against inmates
practicing Muslim and traditional Native American faiths at the
Allen County Jail in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=nEAhk5DE

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Christopher C. Myers, Esq.
          David W. Frank, Esq.
          CHRISTOPHER C. MYERS & ASSOCIATES
          809 South Calhoun Street, Suite 400
          Fort Wayne, IN 46802-2307
          Telephone: (260) 424-0600
          Facsimile: (260) 424-0712
          E-mail: dfrank@myers-law.com


AMERICAN MEDICAL: Faces "Diaz" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
----------------------------------------------------------------
JASMINE DIAZ and JASMINE JONES On behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. NEW WORK CITY, INC.
(d/b/a American Medical Personnel) and GLADSTONE HEADQUARTERS,
INC. (d/b/a American Medical Personnel) and VICKI STANLEY
and TONY MONTESANO, Defendants, Case No. 5:16-cv-02319 (N.D. Ohio,
September 19, 2016), alleges that Defendants failed to pay
Plaintiffs overtime compensation in violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Defendants provide medical staffing services, including staffing
Defendants of State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) and Licensed
Practical Nurses (LPNs) to assisted living and long-term care
facilities throughout Ohio.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     Joseph F. Scott, Esq.
     Ryan A. Winters, Esq.
     SCOTT & WINTERS LAW FIRM, LLC
     The Superior Building
     815 Superior Avenue E., Suite 1325
     Cleveland, OH 44114
     Phone: 440-498-9100
     E-mail: jscott@ohiowagelawyers.com
             rwinters@ohiowagelawyers.com


ANNELLIE'S CAR: Faces "Faine" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
---------------------------------------------------------------
DONTE A. FAINE, and other similarly-situated individuals,
Plaintiff (s), v. ANNELLIE'S CAR WASH LLC and RENE L. MORENO,
individually, Defendants, Case No. 0:16-cv-62269-KMW (S.D. Fla.,
September 22, 2016), seeks to recover money damages for unpaid
minimum and overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

ANNELLIE'S CAR WASH provides car wash services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Zandro E. Palma, Esq.
     ZANDRO E. PALMA, P.A.
     9100 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1500
     Miami, FL 33156
     Phone: (305) 446-1500
     Fax: (305) 446-1502
     E-mail: zep@thepalmalawgroup.com


ASIAN SUPERMARKET: Class Certification Sought in "Huang" Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
Xue Fang Huang moves for a conditional certification of the action
entitled Xue Fang Huang v. Asian Supermarket Corp., et al., Case
No. 1:16-cv-00515-LEK-ATB (N.D.N.Y.), as a representative
collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act on
behalf of all non-exempt employees employed by the Defendants
since May 2010.

The Plaintiff also seeks to send Court-facilitated and Court-
approved notice of the action to the Covered Employees, including
a consent form (opt-in form) as authorized by the FLSA.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=zVeVM1XV

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jian Hang, Esq.
          HANG & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
          136-18 39th Avenue, Suite 1003
          Flushing, NY 11354
          Telephone: (718) 353-8588
          Facsimile: (718) 353-6288
          E-mail: jhang@hanglaw.com


BAKER HUGHES: "Ross" Suit Alleges Misclassification of Employees
----------------------------------------------------------------
SHANNA ROSS, On Behalf of Herself And All Others vs. BAKER HUGHES
INCORPORATED, Defendant, Case No. 4:16-cv-02859 (S.D. Tex.,
September 22, 2016), alleges that Defendant misclassified
Plaintiff as an exempt employee and only paid her straight time
for overtime hours worked in violation of the Fair Labor Standards
Act.

Defendant provides a variety of services in the oilfield for oil
and gas operators nationwide.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Andrew A. Woellner, Esq.
     THE POTTS LAW FIRM, LLP
     100 Waugh Drive, Suite 350
     Houston, TX 77007
     Phone: (713) 963-8881
     Fax: (713) 583-5388
     E-mail: awoellner@potts-law.com

        - and -

     Mark Junell Texas, Esq.
     THE POTTS LAW FIRM, LLP
     100 Waugh Drive, Suite 350
     Houston, TX 77007
     Phone: (713) 963-8881
     Fax: (713) 583-5388
     E-mail: miunell@potts-law.com


BARCLAYS BANK: Faces "Chung" Suit in Southern Dist. of California
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Barclays Bank Delaware. The case
is styled Derrick P. Chung, individually and for all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Barclays Bank Delaware, the
Defendant, Case No. 3:16-cv-02400-AJB-DHB (S.D. Cal., Sep. 23,
2016). The Case is assigned to Judge Anthony J. Battaglia.

Barclays Bank Delaware is the U.S. online banking extension of
U.K. Barclays Bank, a historic institution that has been operating
for more than three centuries.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Sara Fatehmeh Khosroabadi, Esq.
          HYDE & SWIGART
          2221 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 101
          San Diego, CA 92108
          Telephone: (619) 233 7770
          Facsimile: (619) 297 1022
          E-mail: sara@westcoastlitigation.com


BRASSERIE CENTRAL: "Manzo" Suit Moved from Cir. Ct. to S.D. Fla.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Christian Manzo and other
similarly situated employees, the Plaintiffs, v. Brasserie
Central, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, and Pascal B.
Oudin, individually, Case No. 16-021300-CA-01, was removed from
the 11th Judicial Circuit Court, to the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of Florida (Miami). The Southern District
Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-24085-FAM to the proceeding.
The case is assigned to Hon. Judge Federico A. Moreno.

Brasserie Central serves classic French fare, plus a raw bar &
craft cocktails.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brody Max Shulman, Esq.
          Jason Saul Remer, Esq.
          REMER & GEORGES-PIERRE, PLLC
          Courthouse Tower
          44 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
          Miami, FL 33130
          Telephone: (305) 416 5000
          Facsimile: (305) 416 5005
          E-mail: bshulman@rgpattorneys.com
                  jremer@rgpattorneys.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Andrew Lawrence Rodman, Esq.
          STEARNS WEAVER MILLER
          WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON
          Museum Tower
          150 W Flagler Street, Suite 2200
          Miami, FL 33130
          Telephone: (305) 789 3200
          Facsimile: (305) 789 3395
          E-mail: arodman@stearnsweaver.com


BUCKEYE CHECK: Illinois Court Terminates "Saenz" FDCPA Class Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Manish S. Shah granted in part, and denied in part, the
Defendants' motion to dismiss the lawsuit styled JUAN SAENZ v.
BUCKEYE CHECK CASHING OF ILLINOIS, CHECKSMART FINANCIAL, LLC, and
COMMUNITY CHOICE FINANCIAL, INC., Case No. 1:16-cv-06052 (N.D.
Ill.).

The Defendants moved to dismiss Mr. Saenz's complaint for lack of
subject-matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim.  In
his complaint, Mr. Saenz alleges that Buckeye violated the Fair
Debt Collections Practices Act.

In his memorandum opinion and order, Judge Shah opined that Mr.
Saenz did not -- and cannot -- allege facts to support a claim
that Buckeye met the statutory definition of a debt collector
under the FDCPA.  Hence, Judge Shah dismissed the complaint with
prejudice, and the Plaintiff's motion for class certification is
denied as moot.

A copy of the Memorandum is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=h1VTzTdW


CACAO EXPRESS: Faces "Milo" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
-------------------------------------------------------------
ESTELA MILO and other similarly-situated individuals,
Plaintiff(s), v. CACAO EXPRESS, INC. and ELDA BENSHIMOL,
Individually Defendants, Case 1:16-cv-24068-JEM (S.D. Fla.,
September 22, 2016), seeks to recover money damages for unpaid
overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

CACAO EXPRESS, INC. is a catering business, providing meals to go
to families, banquet halls, and other businesses, including
airlines.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Zandro E. Palma, Esq.
     ZANDRO E. PALMA, P.A.
     9100 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1500
     Miami, FL 33156
     Phone: (305) 446-1500
     Fax: (305) 446-1502
     E-mail: zep@thepalmalawgroup.com


CANNERY CASINO: Yanchak Seeks to Certify Table Game Dealers Class
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit titled MICHAEL C. YANCHAK,
individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. CANNERY
CASINO RESORTS, LLC and WASHINGTON TROTTING ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Case No. 2:13-cv-01831-MRH (W.D. Pa.), moves for order of final
certification of the settlement class and final approval of the
class action settlement, the approval of attorneys' fees and
reimbursement of expenses, and for a class representative service
award.  The Class is defined as:

     All current and former employees of Cannery Casino Resorts,
     LLC and Washington Trotting Association, Inc., who worked as
     Table Games Dealers (including poker dealers and dual rate
     dealers) at the Meadows Racetrack and Casino in Washington
     County, Pennsylvania from July 1, 2010 through December 31,
     2013.

Michael C. Yanchak filed a complaint on December 31, 2013,
alleging that the Defendants failed to compensate him and Class
Members employed as Table Games Dealers (including dual-rate
dealers) at the Meadows Racetrack and Casino for all of the time
that they actually worked, at minimum wage, or their regular and
overtime rate, as appropriate, due to the Defendants' alleged
policy of rounding dealers' punch-times, and Table Games
Department practices that required dealers to perform pre- and
post-shift work "off the clock."

Mr. Yanchak also asks the Court (i) to award Class Counsel's fees
in the amount of $116,550, and the reimbursement of their
litigation expenses in the amount of $4,943, and (ii) to approve
service award of $7,500 to the Class Representative in recognition
of the services that he provided to the Class, including the risks
and publicity he incurred.  These amounts will be paid from the
Settlement Amount.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=JE0WWufS

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jonathan K. Cohn, Esq.
          Maureen Davidson-Welling, Esq.
          John Stember, Esq.
          STEMBER COHN & DAVIDSON-WELLING, LLC
          The Hartley Rose Building
          425 First Avenue, 7th Floor
          Pittsburgh, PA 15219
          Telephone: (412) 338-1445
          Facsimile: (412) 338-1446
          E-mail: jcohn@stembercohn.com
                  mdw@stembercohn.com
                  jstember@stembercohn.com


CAREPOINT MEDICAL: Steven Conner Seeks to Certify FDCPA Class
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned STEVEN A. CONNER, DPM,
P.C., individually and on behalf of the class defined herein v.
CAREPOINT MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10, Case No.
2:16-cv-01436-NBF (W.D. Pa.), seeks certification of this class,
or, in the alternative, a stay of briefing on class certification:

     All persons (1) who, on or after a date four years prior to
     the filing of this action (28 U.S.C. Section 1658), (2) were
     sent faxes by or on behalf of defendant Carepoint Medical
     Solutions, LLC, promoting its goods or services for sale (3)
     and which did not contain an opt out notice as described in
     47 U.S.C. Section 227.

Steven A. Conner, DPM, P.C., brought the action after receiving
unsolicited advertising faxes sent by the Defendant, in violation
of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The Plaintiff further asks that it be appointed class
representative and that Edelman, Combs, Lattumer & Goodwin, LLC
and Shenkan Injury Lawyers, LLC, be appointed counsel for the
class.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=AAjVGqKZ

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Richard Shenkan, Esq.
          SHENKAN INJURY LAWYERS, LLC
          6550 Lakeshore Street
          West Bloomfield, MI 48323
          Telephone: (248) 562-1320
          Facsimile: (888) 769-1774
          E-mail: rshenkan@shenkanlaw.com

               - and -

          Daniel A. Edelman, Esq.
          Dulijaza (Julie) Clark, Esq.
          EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER GOODWIN, L.L.C.
          20 S. Clark Street, Suite 1500
          Chicago, IL 60603
          Telephone: (312) 739-4200
          Facsimile: (312) 419-0379
          E-mail: dedelman@edcombs.com
                  jclark@edcombs.com


CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OR: Faces "Abraham" Suit in Dist. of Oregon
-------------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Clackamas County. The case is
entitled Andrew Abraham, on behalf of himself, and for all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Clackamas County, and
Corizon Health, Inc., formerly known as: Prison Health Services,
Inc., the Defendants, Case No. 3:16-cv-01877-PK (D. Oreg.,
September 23, 2016). The case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul
Papak.

Clackamas County is a county located in the U.S. state of Oregon.
As of the 2010 census, the population was 375,992, making it the
third-most populous county in Oregon.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Carl Lee Post, Esq.
          Daniel J. Snyder, Esq.
          John D. Burgess, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL SNYDER
          1000 S.W. Broadway, Suite 2400
          Portland, OR 97205
          Telephone: (503) 241 3617
          Facsimile: (503) 241 2249
          E-mail: carlpost@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com
                  dansnyder@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com
                  johnburgess@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com


COMENITY CAPITAL: Faces "Chung" Suit in S.D. of California
----------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Comenity Capital Bank & Paypal,
Inc. The case is captioned Jean S. Chung, individually and for all
others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Comenity Capital Bank
& Paypal, Inc., the Defendant, Case No. 3:16-cv-02401-GPC-KSC
(S.D. Cal., September 23, 2016). The Case is assigned to Hon.
Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel.

Comenity Capital operates as an industrial bank and issues credit
cards for retailers. The company also underwrites credit programs
on behalf of its partners including North America's retail brands.
The company was formerly known as World Financial Capital Bank and
changed its name to Comenity Capital Bank in October, 2012. The
company was founded in 2003 and is based in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Comenity Capital Bank operates as a subsidiary of Comenity LLC.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Sara Fatehmeh Khosroabadi, Esq.
          HYDE & SWIGART
          2221 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 101
          San Diego, CA 92108
          Telephone: (619) 233 7770
          Facsimile: (619) 297 1022
          E-mail: sara@westcoastlitigation.com


DA DAVIDSON COS: Parties Seeks OK of "Monaco" Class Settlement
--------------------------------------------------------------
The parties in the lawsuit entitled MICHAEL MONACO, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated v. D.A. DAVIDSON
COMPANIES, Case No. 5:16-cv-00332-SJO-DTB (C.D. Cal.), jointly
file with the Court a motion for preliminary approval of their
class action settlement.

The proposed Settlement Class consists of all persons who, between
February 24, 2013, to July 29, 2016, executed the Authorization
and do not opt-out of the settlement.

The Settlement is the product of arms-length negotiations
conducted in private mediation by Martin Quinn, according to the
Motion.  Under the proposed settlement, D.A. Davidson agrees to
establish a $145,000 non-reversionary settlement fund to resolve
the Plaintiff's class claims that D.A. Davidson violated federal
and state laws regarding background checks, including the Fair
Credit Reporting Act, the California Consumer Reporting Agencies
Act, California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act, as
well as California unfair practices law under California Business
and Professions Code.

The Plaintiff alleged that D.A. Davidson violated these provisions
when it had its applicants and employees sign a defective
"Authorization for Employer Access to Consumer Reports."

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=WP1iTsAO

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Kyann C. Kalin, Esq.
          STUTHEIT KALIN LLC
          308 SW First Avenue, Suite 325
          Portland, OR 97204
          Telephone: (971) 285-7578
          Facsimile: (503) 715-5670
          E-mail: Kyann@stutheitkalin.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Benjamin A. Emmert, Esq.
          Karin Cogbill, Esq.
          LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
          50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
          San Jose, CA 95113.2303
          Telephone: (408) 998-4150
          Facsimile: (408) 288-5686
          E-mail: bemmert@littler.com
                  kcogbill@littler.com


DANNYS ATHENS: Faces "Martinez" Suit in S.D. of New York
--------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Dannys Athens Diner Inc. The case
is styled Alejandro Barragan Martinez, on behalf of others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Dannys Athens Diner Inc.,
doing business as Danny's Athens Restaurant, Kristina Martinez,
and Daniel Martinez, the Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-07468
(S.D.N.Y., Sept. 23, 2016).

Dannys Athens is a restaurant located at Westchester Ave, Bronx,
New York.

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


DAS TRUCKING: Faces "Jones" Suit Seeking Overtime Pay Under FLSA
----------------------------------------------------------------
DEMOND JONES on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly
Situated, Plaintiff, v. DAS TRUCKING, LLC, Defendant, Case No.
4:16-cv-02816 (S.D. Tex., September 19, 2016), seeks to recover
overtime compensation, minimum wage, unpaid wages, liquidated
damages, attorney's fees, litigation expenses, costs of court,
pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and injunctive relief
under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Defendant is operating as a trucking company in Harris County,
Texas.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Charles M.R. Vethan, Esq.
     THE VETHAN LAW FIRM, PC
     3501 Allen Parkway
     Houston, TX 77019
     Phone: (713) 526-2222
     Fax: (713) 526-2230
     E-mail: cvethan@vethanlaw.com
             jlanza@vethanlaw.com


DESIGNED RECEIVABLE: Goodson's Bid to Certify Under Submission
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable James V. Selna takes under submission two motions
filed in the lawsuit captioned SEANNA GOODSON v. DESIGNED
RECEIVABLE SOLUTIONS, INC., Case No. 2:15-cv-03308-JVS-JPR (C.D.
Cal.):

   (1) Plaintiff's motion to certify class; and

   (2) Defendant's motion for summary judgment, or in the
       alternative, motion for partial summary judgment as to
       Plaintiff's TCPA Claim and DFDCPA Claim.

According to the Court's civil minutes, cause called and counsel
makes their appearances.  The Court's tentative ruling is issued
and counsel makes their arguments.

A copy of the Civil Minutes is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=mSdt60Of

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Adrian R. Bacon, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
          324 S. Beverly Dr., #725
          Beverly Hills, CA 90212
          Telephone: (877) 206-4741
          Facsimile: (866) 633-0228
          E-mail: abacon@attorneysforconsumers.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Andrew M. Steinheimer, Esq.
          ELLIS LAW GROUP LLP
          740 University Ave., Suite 100
          Sacramento, CA 95825
          Telephone: (916) 283-8820
          Facsimile: (916) 283-8821
          E-mail: ASteinheimer@Ellislawgrp.com


EASTMAN CHEMICAL: Proposed Class Action Settlement Announced
------------------------------------------------------------
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware, dated September 7, 2016, that
Sterling, Eastman Chemical Company, John L. Teeger, John V.
Genova, Richard K. Crump, John W. Gildea, Philip M. Sivin, Karl W.
Schwarzfeld, Daniel M. Fishbane, Walter Treybig, Martin D. Sass,
M.D. Sass Investors Services, Inc., Resurgence Asset Management,
L.L.C., Re/Enterprise Asset Management L.L.C., M.D. Sass
Associates, Inc. Employee Profit Sharing Plan, Eastman TC, Inc.,
Moelis & Company LLC, Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Principal
(collectively, the "Parties") have entered into a proposed
settlement of the above-captioned lawsuits, challenging the
acquisition of Sterling by Eastman Chemical Company.  The complete
terms of the Settlement are set forth in the Stipulation and
Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release dated as of
September 2, 2016.  The Stipulation can be obtained at
www.sterlingchemicalssettlement.com.  A settlement hearing is
scheduled to be held on December 9, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., in the
Court of Chancery, 500 North King Street, Wilmington, DE 19801 to
determine whether the Court should approve the Settlement as fair,
reasonable and adequate, whether Plaintiff and the law firm of
Friedlander & Gorris P.A. have adequately represented the
interests of the Settlement Class in the Actions, and to consider
other matters, including a request by Plaintiff for a Fee
Reimbursement Award, including fees and expenses incurred in
connection with bringing and pursuing the Actions, presenting the
Settlement to the Court, and defending Resurgence Asset
Management, LLC, et al., v. Steven L. Gidumal, Case No. 2015-CA-
1278-0, in the Circuit of the Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for
Orange County, Florida (the "Florida Action") which Plaintiff
contends are recoverable in these Actions, and for a Special Award
for services over and above the customary responsibilities of a
class representative.

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS DESCRIBED, YOUR RIGHTS
WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE PENDING ACTION AND THE SETTLEMENT.  If you
have not received the full printed Notice of Proposed Settlement
of Class Action (the "Notice"), you may obtain a copy of the
Stipulation, Notice and/or the Proof of Claim by contacting the
Settlement Administrator or Class Counsel:

         Sterling Chemicals Settlement
         Settlement Administrator
         PO Box 3230
         Portland, OR 97208-3230
         Tel: (888) 643-2170
         www.sterlingchemicalssettlement.com

         Joel Friedlander, Esq.
         Email: JFriedlander@friedlandergorris.com
         Jeffrey M. Gorris, Esq.
         Email: JGorris@friedlandergorris.com
         Friedlander & Gorris P.A.
         1201 N. Market Street, Suite 2200
         Wilmington, DE 19801
         Tel: (302) 573-3500

If you are a Class Member you will be bound by any judgment
entered in the Actions.  Any objections to the Settlement and/or
application for a Fee Reimbursement Award and Special Award must
be filed with the Court and delivered to all counsel listed in the
Notice such that they are received no later than November 17,
2016, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice.
Class Members who do not object need not appear at the Settlement
Hearing or take any other action to indicate their approval.

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK'S OFFICE REGARDING
THIS NOTICE.  If you have any questions about the litigation or
the Settlement, you may contact Class Counsel:

         Joel Friedlander, Esq.
         Jeffrey M. Gorris, Esq.
         Friedlander & Gorris P.A.
         1201 N. Market Street, Suite 2200
         Wilmington, DE 19801
         Tel: (302) 573-3500


FEARON ET AL.: Faces "Graham" Suit in Northern District of Ohio
---------------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Richard Fearon. The case is
captioned Todd Graham, Paul Johnson, and Russ Poptanycz,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, the
Plaintiffs, v. Richard Fearon, Ken D. Semelsberger, Billie Rawot,
Trent Meyerhoefer, and Mark McGuire, the Defendants, Case No.
1:16-cv-02366-PAG (N.D. Ohio, Sept. 23, 2016). The Case is
assigned to Hon. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Edward H. Glenn, Jr., Esq.
          Jacob H. Zamansky, Esq.
          Samuel E. Bonderoff, Esq.
          ZAMANSKY LLC
          50 Broadway, 32nd Floor
          New York, NY 10004
          Telephone: (212) 742 1414
          Facsimile: (212) 742 1177

               - and -

          Frank L. Gallucci, III, Esq.
          David R. Grant, Esq.
          PLEVIN & GALLUCCI
          55 Public Square
          2222 Illuminating Bldg.
          Cleveland, OH 44113
          Telephone: (216) 861 0804
          Facsimile: (216) 861 5322
          E-mail: fgallucci@pglawyer.com
                  dgrant@pglawyer.com


FIAT CHRYSLER: Securities Class Action Lawsuit Filed in Mich.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP announced that it has filed a class
action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Michigan on behalf of a class consisting of persons
and entities that acquired Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V.
securities between October 16, 2013 and July 18, 2016, inclusive.

If you are a member of the Class described, you may move the Court
no later than September 27, 2016, to serve as lead plaintiff.
Please contact Lesley Portnoy at 888-773-9224 or 310-201-9150, or
at shareholders@glancylaw.com to discuss this matter.

Throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false
and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose
material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations,
and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or
misleading statements and/or failed to disclose: (1) that the
Company had not achieved the sales growth originally communicated
to investors; (2) that the Company did not in fact achieve a 75
month streak of monthly vehicle sales growth (on a year over year
basis); and (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants'
statements about FCA's business, operations, and prospects, were
false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

To be a member of the Class you need not take any action at this
time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and
remain an absent member of the Class. If you wish to learn more
about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this
announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these
matters, please contact Lesley Portnoy, Esquire, of Glancy Prongay
& Murray LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles,
California 90067, at (310) 201-9150, by e-mail to
shareholders@glancylaw.com, or visit our website at
http://www.glancylaw.com.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some
jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.


GLOBAL PAYMENTS: Certification of Class Sought in "Waters" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
James M. Waters and Michaela Shelton Waters move the Court for an
order determining that the action entitled JAMES M. WATERS AND
MICHAELA SHELTON WATERS v. GLOBAL PAYMENTS, INC., et al., Case No.
5:14-cv-06134-BP (W.D. Mo.), will be maintained as a class action
on behalf of this Class:

     All persons on whose bank accounts Defendants drew a
     remotely created check on or after December 5, 2013 that was
     made payable to Global Payments Check Recovery Services,
     Inc.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to appoint them as
representatives of the Class and to designate their attorneys and
the firm Walters Bender Strohbehn & Vaughan, P.C., as Class
Counsel.  They further seek an order directing Class Counsel to
prepare a Notice of Class Action to be disseminated to the members
of the Class by direct mail.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=YqTFOj8Q

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          R. Frederick Walters, Esq.
          Garrett M. Hodes, Esq.
          WALTERS BENDER STROHBEHN & VAUGHAN, P.C.
          2500 City Center Square
          1100 Main Street
          Kansas City, MO 64105
          Telephone: (816) 421-6620
          Facsimile: (816) 421-4747
          E-mail: fwalters@wbsvlaw.com
                  ghodes@wbsvlaw.com


GOOGLE INC: Gmail Privacy Class Action Lawsuit Trimmed
------------------------------------------------------
Kat Sieniuc, writing for Law360, reports that a California federal
judge on Sept. 23 clipped a proposed class action accusing Google
of scanning emails for advertisers, but wouldn't toss the case
entirely, saying the class has shown potential harm under the
Spokeo test.

Plaintiff Daniel Matera sued Google in September 2015, alleging
the company's Gmail email system violated the Wiretap Act by
intentionally intercepting emails in order to create user profiles
that provided targeted advertising.

U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh concluded Matera's claim for
injunctive relief didn't have weight, saying there was no risk for
future injury since Google had stopped intercepting emails sent or
received from Google Apps for Education users in 2014.

But the judge refused to kill the case entirely, saying Matera has
grounds to sue in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in
Spokeo Inc. v. Robins, which decided a plaintiff must allege
"concrete" harm that is "real" and "not abstract" to establish
Article III standing.

"Such unauthorized interception of communications may give rise to
a legally cognizable injury," Judge Koh said.

Attorneys representing both parties did not immediately return
requests for comment.

Matera said Google never obtained consent before cataloging and
analyzing the content of their personal messages, which he
compared to the U.S. Postal Service rifling through letters.

He proposed a class covering Californians who don't have Gmail
accounts but communicate with Gmail users, allegedly exposing
their private correspondence to Google's analytics system without
their knowledge or permission.

Google eventually moved to dismiss the case, claiming the alleged
interception, scanning and analysis of emails falls within normal
business practices, and arguing a nexus exists between the alleged
interceptions and Google's ability to provide Gmail. Without the
targeted advertising, Google wouldn't have the revenue necessary
to provide Gmail, the company argued.

But the court shut down that argument, ruling in August that the
practice is not considered part of the company's day-to-day
operations under federal wiretapping laws.

Matera is represented by Michael W. Sobol, Nicole D. Sugnet and
Michael Levin-Gesundheit of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein
LLP, Hank Bates of Carney Bates & Pulliam PLLC and Ray E. Gallo
and Dominic R. Valerian of Gallo LLP.

Google is represented by Michael G. Rhodes, Esq. --
rhodesmg@cooley.com -- Whitty Somvichian, Esq. --
wsomvichian@cooley.com -- Kyle C. Wong, Esq. -- kwong@cooley.com -
- Karen L. Burhans, Esq. -- kburhans@cooley.com -- and Amy M.
Smith, Esq. -- amsmith@cooley.com -- of Cooley LLP.

The case is Daniel Matera v. Google Inc., case number 5:15-cv-
04062, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California.


GREYFOX UTIITY: Faces "O'Brien" Lawsuit Under FLSA, Ohio Wage Act
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN 25021 Aurora Road, Lot 207, Bedford Heights,
Ohio 44146, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, vs. GREYFOX UTIITY SERVICES, LLC c/o
Statutory Agent Richard Metzinger, 788 Busch Court, Columbus, Ohio
43229, Defendant, Case No. 1:16-cv-02324 (N.D. Ohio, September 19,
2016), seeks applicable minimum wage for non-exempt employees
under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage
Standards Act.

GREYFOX UTIITY SERVICES, LLC is a Pennsylvania corporation that
provides installation services for high definition television,
high speed internet, and digital telephone products for cable and
satellite TV companies, including Comcast, Time Warner Cable,
Armstrong Cable, Suddenlink, and Atlantic Broadband throughout
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, and West Virginia.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Chastity L. Christy, Esq.
     Anthony J. Lazzaro, Esq.
     Lori M. Griffin, Esq.
     THE LAZZARO LAW FIRM, LLC
     920 Rockefeller Building
     614 W. Superior Avenue
     Cleveland, OH 44113
     Phone: 216-696-5000
     Fax: 216-696-7005
     E-mail: chastity@lazzarolawfirm.com
             anthony@lazzarolawfirm.com
             lori@lazzarolawfirm.com


GRK 451: Faces "Vasquez" Lawsuit Under FLSA, NY Labor Law
---------------------------------------------------------
WALTER NEIRA VASQUEZ and JOHN DOE, on behalf of themselves and
FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs, v. GRK 451 LEXINGTON AVE
LLC d/b/a GRK, FULTON QUALITY FOODS LLC d/b/a GRK and GEORGIOS
NIKAS, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-07305 (S.D.N.Y., September 19,
2016), seeks to recover from Defendants: alleged (1) unpaid
minimum wages, (2) liquidated damages and (3) attorneys' fees and
costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act; and alleged (1) unpaid
minimum wages, (2) liquidated damages and statutory penalties and
(3) attorneys' fees and costs under the New York Labor Law.

Defendants operate a restaurant enterprise using the trade name,
"GRK."

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     C.K. Lee, Esq.
     Anne Seelig, Esq.
     LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC
     30 East 39th Street, Second Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Phone: 212-465-1188
     Fax: 212-465-1181


HULCHER SERVICES: "Stagner" Suit Seeks to Recoup Pay Under FLSA
---------------------------------------------------------------
DAVID STAGNER, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. HULCHER SERVICES INC., Registered Agent:
CT Corporation System, 120 South Central Ave.,
Clayton, MO 63105 Defendants, Case No. 4:16-cv-01036-SWH (W.D.
Mo., September 22, 2016), alleges that Defendants failed to pay
Plaintiff, and other similarly situated employees, the mandated
federal and/or state minimum wage rate for all hours worked and
overtime for all hours worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

HULCHER SERVICES INC. is a service contractor to the railroads,
general industry and government.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Matthew E. Osman, Esq.
     Kathryn S. Rickley, Esq.
     8500 W. 110th Street, Suite 330
     Overland Park, KS 66204
     Phone: (913) 667-9243
     Fax: (866) 470-9243
     E-mail: mosman@workerwagerights.com
             krickley@workerwagerights.com


INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT: Faces "Richardson" Suit in Ca. Super. Ct.
----------------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY
LLC. The case is titled RICHARDSON, DINA RAE INDIVIDUALLY AND OB
BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, the Plaintiff, v.
INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
INTERSTATE HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION, and DOES
1-50 INCLUSIVE, the Defendant, Case No. CGC 16 554468 (Cal. Super.
Ct., Sept. 23, 2016).

Interstate Management Company, LLC operates a restaurant. It was
formerly known as Meristar Management Company, LLC. The company
was incorporated in 1998 and is based in Arlington, Virginia.
Interstate Management Company, LLC operates as a subsidiary of
Interstate Operating Company, LP.


ISORAY INC: Inks Deal to Settle Shareholder Class Action Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
IsoRay, Inc., a medical technology company and innovator in seed
brachytherapy and medical radioisotope applications for the
treatment of prostate, brain, lung, head and neck, and
gynecological cancers, announced that on September 23, 2016, it
entered into a Stipulation of Settlement, pursuant to which IsoRay
and IsoRay's former CEO have, subject to certain conditions and
approvals, agreed to settle the previously-disclosed consolidated
securities class action litigation, In re IsoRay, Inc. Securities
Litigation, Case No. 4:15-cv-05046-LRS, pending in the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Washington.

If the Settlement becomes final, among other things, (i) the
claims against the Defendants will be dismissed with prejudice and
released, such that every member of the settlement class will be
barred from asserting against the Defendants any claims alleged in
the complaint or arising from the complaint, and (ii) a payment of
$3,537,500 will be made for the benefit of the settlement class,
which IsoRay expects to be funded entirely by its insurance
carriers. The Defendants have denied and continue to deny each and
all of the claims alleged by the plaintiffs in the Litigation.
Nevertheless, the Defendants have agreed to the Settlement to
eliminate the uncertainty, distraction, burden, and expense of
further litigation.

The proposed Settlement is subject to a number of conditions,
including, among other items, preliminary and final court
approval. Details regarding any proposed Settlement will be
communicated to potential class members prior to the final court
approval. At this time, there can be no assurance that the
conditions to effect the Settlement will be met or that the
settlement of the Litigation will receive the required court
approvals.

                           About IsoRay

IsoRay, Inc., through its subsidiary, IsoRay Medical, Inc., is the
sole producer of Cesium-131 brachytherapy seeds, which are
expanding brachytherapy options throughout the body. Learn more
about this innovative Richland, Washington company and explore the
many benefits and uses of Cesium-131 by visiting www.isoray.com


ITT EDUCATIONAL: "Mosele" Lawsuit Seeks Redress Under WARN Act
--------------------------------------------------------------
RANDY MOSELE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, vs. ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICS, INC. Defendant,
Case 2:16-cv-14883 (E.D. La., September 22, 2016), was brought as
a result of Defendant's alleged failure to provide its workers
with the notification required under the federal Worker Adjustment
and Retraining Notification Act.

ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICS, INC. operates approximately 130 campuses
in 38 states.

     Eric J. O'Bell, Esq.
     Bradley T. Oster, Esq.
     O'BELL LAW FIRM, LLC
     3500 North Hullen Street
     Metairie, LA 70002
     Phone: (504) 456-8677
     Fax: (504) 456-8653

        - and -

     John H. Smith, Esq.
     Loren D. Shanklin, Esq.
     SMITH SHANKLIN SOSA, LLC
     16841 Jefferson Hwy, Suite 5A
     Baton Rouge, LA 70817
     Phone: (225) 223-6333
     Fax: (888) 413-8345

        - and -

     Larry M. Aisola, Jr., Esq.
     LARRY M. AISOLA, JR. L.L.C.
     530 E. Judge Perez Drive, Suite B
     Chalmette, LA 70043
     Phone: (504) 682-6733
     Fax: (504) 682-6734


JOHNSON & JOHNSON: Canadians File Talcum Powder Class Action
------------------------------------------------------------
Laurence Banville of Banville, in an article for Legal Examiner,
says that TheProductLawyers.com reports on a recent lawsuit filed
by women in Canada related to claims that talcum powder products
lead to the development of ovarian cancer. According to the
Toronto Star, the suit involves seven women and alleges that
Johnson & Johnson was "negligent in the development, testing,
design, manufacturing, licensing, distribution, marketing, and
sale of Johnson's Baby Powder." Additionally, the suit claims that
the company knew about the dangers of their talcum powder products
but did not inform consumers of the alleged health risks
associated with them.

Litigation In The U.S.

As a class action suit is brought against Johnson & Johnson by
Canadian women, thousands more are pending in the U.S. Following
two major lawsuits in which Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay
$55 million and $72 million, many women and family members of
women who have passed away have filed suits claiming the company's
products were responsible for the deadly disease. Women have
claimed that the company hid valuable information related to the
health risks of their products from consumers. Johnson & Johnson
has aggressively denied these claims and has managed to get
several cases dismissed, including two in New Jersey.

Studies On Substance Exposure And Cancer

Cancer.org identifies several ways that researchers typically
identify a substance's carcinogenic qualities. Lab studies are
typically done to determine carcinogenic properties in substances.
In these studies, animals are exposed to a substance to see if it
causes tumors or other health problems. Researchers might also
expose normal cells in a lab dish to the substance to see if it
causes the types of changes that are seen in cancer cells, the
group says. Other studies include studies done on people where
researchers will observe cancer rates in different groups of
people and compare the groups that have and have not been exposed
to the substance.


JP MORGAN: Faces "Barrow" Suit in Northern District of Georgia
--------------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
The case is captioned Tomeka Barrow, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. JP Morgan Chase Bank,
N.A., the Defendant, Case No. 1:16-cv-03577-SCJ (N.D. Ga., Sept.
23, 2016). The Case is assigned to Hon. Judge Steve C Jones.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. is a global financial services firm and one
of the largest banking institutions in the United States, with
operations worldwide.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Clifton Dorsen, Esq.
          Skaar and Feagle, Suite B
          2374 Main Street
          Tucker, GA 30084
          Telephone: (404) 373 1978
          E-mail: cdorsen@skaarandfeagle.com

               - and -

          James Marvin Feagle, Esq.
          Justin Tharpe Holcombe, Esq.
          Kris Kelly Skaar, Esq.
          SKAAR AND FEAGLE
          2374 Main Street, Suite B
          Tucker, GA 30084
          Telephone: (404) 373 1970
          Facsimile: (404) 601 1855
          E-mail: jfeagle@skaarandfeagle.com
                  jholcombe@skaarandfeagle.com
                  krisskaar@aol.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Brian F. Hansen, Esq.
          Kutak Rock, LLP-ATL
          303 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2750
          Atlanta, GA 30308
          Telephone: (404) 222 4654
          E-mail: brian.hansen@kutakrock.com


KATE SPADE: Faces "Irvine" Suit Over Alleged False Advertising
--------------------------------------------------------------
DANIEL IRVINE AND CHERYL ANDERSON, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. KATE SPADE AND
COMPANY., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Defendant, Case 1:16-cv-07300 (S.D.N.Y., September 19, 2016),
seeks monetary damages, restitution, injunctive and declaratory
relief from Defendant, Kate Spade and Company, for allegedly
falsely advertising original prices and corresponding price
discounts for its Kate Spade Outlet Merchandise in violation of
Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, the Florida
state law and New York General Business Law.

KATE SPADE AND COMPANY -- http://www.katespadeandcompany.com/--
together with its subsidiaries, designs and markets apparel and
accessories.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     Noah Shube, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF NOAH SHUBE
     401 Broadway, Suite 2115
     New York, NY 10013
     Phone: 212.274.8638
     Fax: 917.398.1958
     E-mail: nshube@nsfirm.com


LANGSTON CONSTRUCTION: Mairena-Rivera Seeks Class Certification
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned BISMARK MAIRENA-RIVERA, on
behalf of himself and other persons similarly situated v. LANGSTON
CONSTRUCTION, LLC and COMPOSITE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SYSTEMS, LLC,
and MICHAEL LANGSTON, Case No. 2:16-cv-04493-JTM-JCW (E.D. La.),
moves for conditional class certification, judicial notice, and
for disclosure of the names and addresses of potential "opt-in"
plaintiffs.

The action arises from a "generally applicable rule, policy, or
practice" pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=r6ChPfev

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Roberto Luis Costales, Esq.
          Emily A. Westermeier, Esq.
          THE COSTALES LAW OFFICE
          3801 Canal Street, Suite 207
          New Orleans, LA 70119
          Telephone: (504) 534-5005
          E-mail: whbeaumont@gmail.com
                  emily.costaleslawoffice@gmail.com

               - and -

          William H. Beaumont, Esq.
          WILLIAM BEAUMONT LAW
          William H. Beaumont (#33005)
          3801 Canal Street, Suite 207
          New Orleans, LA 70119
          Telephone: (504) 483-8008
          E-mail: whbeaumont@gmail.com


LENDER LEGAL: Faces "Galvin" Suit in Middle District of Florida
---------------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Lender Legal Services, LLC. The
case is styled Raymond Galvin and Jacqueline Galvin, on behalf of
themselves and all similarly-situated individuals, the Plaintiff,
v. Lender Legal Services, LLC, the Defendant, Case No. 8:16-cv-
02735-MSS-AAS (M.D. Fla., Sept. 23, 2016). The Case is assigned to
Hon. Judge Mary S. Scriven.

Lender Legal provides creditors with exceptional representation at
a great value.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Brandon J. Hill, Esq.
          Luis A. Cabassa, Esq.
          WENZEL FENTON CABASSA, PA
          1110 N Florida Ave Ste 300
          Tampa, FL 33602-3343
          Telephone: (813) 224 0431
          Facsimile: (813) 229 8712
          E-mail: bhill@wfclaw.com
                  lcabassa@wfclaw.com


LIBERTY ACTION: Faces Class Action Over Trump Donation Ads
----------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Kaczynski, writing for BuzzFeed News, reports that a pro-
Donald Trump political action committee has stopped soliciting
donations through radio advertisements as it faces a class action
lawsuit and an inquiry from the Federal Election Commission.

A BuzzFeed News review of multiple closed captioning tracking
tools reveals Liberty Action Group PAC -- a group which has raised
hundreds of thousands of dollars by running radio ads soliciting
donations to help elect Trump -- has not run advertisements since
Sept. 9. The day before, BuzzFeed News reported the group was the
subject of a class action complaint in federal court.
Liberty Action Group's FEC filings show little evidence that it
has spent any of its donations to help elect Trump.

The group removed two names from its amended FEC filings,
submitted on Sept. 23. Henok Tedla has been removed as the PAC's
treasurer and Rob Reyes, a former contact for the PAC, was also
removed from the group's filings.

Reached by BuzzFeed News, Tedla said he was aware of the filings,
and confirmed he was no longer the PAC's treasurer. "I'm just
doing the monthly accounting," he said.

The director of Liberty Action Group, Josiah Cammer, did not
return a request for comment.

Two weeks ago, the Cammer responded to an FEC inquiry asking why
the group's filings lacked basic information about its spending
and contributions. Cammer told the FEC he was unaware that he
needed to list basic information about the group's donors in
public filings and said the group is attempting to ask its donor
base for additional information to refile to the FEC.

Another PAC with ties to Liberty Action Group - a progressive
group called Progressive Priorities PAC - also sent amended
filings to the FEC on Sept. 23.

The alleged-Democratic group, which ran robocalls for Hillary
Clinton and Bernie Sanders during the primary, is, according to
sources, run by the same individuals as Liberty Action Group, and
shared contact information and a treasurer. The listed director of
that PAC, Alexa Roth, had no knowledge she was the listed director
on the filings.

In the group's amended filings, Tedla was again removed as the
treasurer of the PAC. Roth is now listed as treasurer as well.
Roth told BuzzFeed News she was not aware of the amended filings
and said she did not electronically sign them. As FEC filings note
at the bottom, "submission of false, erroneous, or incomplete
information may subject the person signing this Statement to the
penalties of 2 U.S.C. Sec 437g," subjecting them to civil
penalties.


LOOMIS ARMORED: "Gomez et al." Seek Overtime Wage Under FLSA
------------------------------------------------------------
JUAN GOMEZ, FRANK PARTIDA, BENJAMIN ALCALA, BRIDGET AGUILAR-
PLACERES, NATHAN BROWN, FERNANDO VIDALES, JOHN MUNIZ, TRAVIS
BARTON, MIGUEL SANCHEZ AND ADRIAN GARZA Individually and on Behalf
of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. LOOMIS ARMORED
US, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 5:16-cv-00931 (W.D. Tex., September
19, 2016), seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages under the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Defendant employed "armored guards" to perform driving, security,
guarding, delivery and pickup services of monies and other
valuable assets for its clients, in person and in a variety of
vehicles.

Loomis Armored US LLC -- https://www.loomis.us/ -- is a detective
and armored car service located in Richmond, California.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     Dennis L. Richard, Esq.
     Lance C. Blankenship, Esq.
     KENNARD RICHARD P.C.
     100 NE Loop 410, Suite 610
     San Antonio, TX 78216
     Phone: (210) 314-5688
     Fax: (210) 314-5687
     E-mail: dennis.richard@kennardlaw.com
             lance.blankenship@kennardlaw.com


LOS ANGELES, CA: Yagman's Bid to Certify Taken Under Submission
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. George H. King has taken under submission the Plaintiff's
motion for class certification filed in the lawsuit styled Stephen
Yagman v. Eric Garcetti, et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-05944-GHK-E
(C.D. Cal.).

Eric Michael Garcetti is the current mayor of Los Angeles.

On the Court's own motion, Plaintiff's Motion for Class
Certification, noticed for hearing on October 3, 2016, is taken
off calendar and will be taken under submission without oral
argument on that date, according to the Court's civil minutes.  No
appearance by counsel will be necessary.  The hearing date is
vacated.  Further briefing, if any, will be filed in accordance
with Local Rules as if the noticed hearing date had not been
vacated.

A copy of the Civil Minutes is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=UxDaw0HU


M&M BEDDING: Faces "Ellingsen" Lawsuit Under FLSA, Md. Labor Laws
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MICHAEL ELLINGSEN, and SHERRY ORBAN, Individually and On Behalf of
Other Similarly Situated Employees Plaintiffs, v. M&M BEDDING, LLC
d/b/a EASY REST, ADJUSTABLE SLEEP SYSTEMS, MOHAMED R. MAGHARI and
JEFFREY M. MOWREY, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-03179-ELH (D. Md.,
September 19, 2016), seeks to recover alleged unpaid wages,
liquidated damages, interest, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act; unpaid wages,
interest, liquidated damages, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
under Maryland Wage and Hour Law, Maryland Code Annotated, Labor
and Employment Article; and unpaid wages, interest, treble
damages, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs under the Maryland
Wage Payment and Collection Law.

Defendants are in the business of selling "Easy Rest" beds and
mattresses.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Benjamin L. Davis, III, Esq.
     George E. Swegman, Esq.
     THE LAW OFFICES OF PETER T. NICHOLL
     36 South Charles Street, Suite 1700
     Baltimore, MD 21201
     Phone: (410) 244-7005
     Fax: (410) 244-8454
     E-mail: bdavis@nicholllaw.com
             gswegman@nicholllaw.com


MBF INSPECTION: Ohio Court Certifies FLSA Class in "Ganci" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. George C. Smith granted the Plaintiff's motion for
conditional certification filed in the lawsuit styled THOMAS GANCI
v. MBF INSPECTION SERVICES, INC., Case No. 2:15-cv-02959-GCS-TPK
(S.D. Ohio).  The Class is defined as:

     All inspection personnel and those similarly situated who
     were paid a day rate and who worked for Defendant at any
     time since three years prior to this Court's order granting
     conditional certification.

The Plaintiff has brought the collective action pursuant to the
Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards
Act, seeking to recover alleged unpaid overtime wages from MBF for
hours worked in excess of 40 hours per week for the three-year
period preceding the Court's determination on the Plaintiff's
Motion.

A copy of the Opinion and Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=ntBsPard


MCKEE FOODS: "Vargas" Suit Alleges Misclassification of Drivers
---------------------------------------------------------------
HINOLVONO VARGAS, on behalf of himself and those similarly
situated, Plaintiffs, v. MCKEE FOODS CORPORATION, Defendant, Case
No. 1:16-cv-11915 (D. Mass., September 22, 2016), alleges that
delivery drivers were misclassified as "independent contractors,"
when they were actually employees for purposes of the federal Fair
Labor Standards Act.

MCKEE FOODS CORPORATION produces and distributes certain snack
food brands such as Little Debbie snack cakes, to stores
throughout the country, including within Massachusetts.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Michael J. Bace, Esq.
     BACE LAW GROUP, LLC
     PO Box 9316
     Boston, MA 02114
     Phone: 5089228328
     E-mail: mjb@bacelaw.com

        - and -

     Harold L. Lichten, Esq.
     Matthew W. Thomson, Esq.
     LICHTEN & LISSRIORDAN, P.C.
     729 Boylston Street., Suite 2000
     Boston MA 02116
     Phone: 6179945800
     Fax: 6179945801
     E-mail: hlichten@llrlaw.com
             mthomson@llrlaw.com


MGT CAPITAL: Faces "Exley" Suit Over Planned Acquisitions
---------------------------------------------------------
JOHN EXLEY, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated, Plaintiff, V. MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC. and ROBERT
B. LADD, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-07415 (S.D.N.Y., September
22, 2016), alleges violations of the Securities Exchange Act in
relation to Defendants' plan to acquire Demonsaw LLC and D-Vasive,
Inc.

MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC. operates gaming sites in the mobile
and online space, including fantasy sports wagering platforms and
casino games.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Gregory Mark Nespole, Esq.
     Kate M. McGuire, Esq.
     WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN HERZ LLP
     270 Madison Avenue
     New York, NY 10016
     Phone: (212) 545-4600
     Fax: (212) 686-0114
     E-mail: Nespole@whafh.com

        - and -

     Jeffrey C. Block, Esq.
     Steven P. Harte, Esq.
     Bradley J. Vettraino, Esq.
     BLOCK & LEVITON LLP
     155 Federal Street, Suite 400
     Boston, MA 02110
     Phone: (617) 398-5600
     Fax: (617) 507-6020


MGT CAPITAL: Bronstein Gewirtz Files Securities Class Suit
----------------------------------------------------------
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC notifies investors that a class
action lawsuit has been filed against MGT Capital Investments,
Inc. and certain of its officers. The class action is on behalf of
a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased MGT
securities between May 9, 2016 and September 20, 2016, inclusive.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for
alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").

MGT acquires, advances, and monetizes assets in the online,
mobile, and casino gaming space. The Company operates through two
segments, Gaming and Intellectual Property. The Company is
currently in the process of acquiring D-Vasive, a provider of
leading edge anti-spy software, and Demonsaw, a provider of a
secure and anonymous file sharing software platform.

On May 9, 2016, MGT announced that it had entered into an
agreement to acquire certain assets and technologies from D-Vasive
Inc., a provider of anti-spy software (the "D-Vasive
Transaction").  With this acquisition, MGT announced the planned
position of Defendant John McAfee as MGT's Executive Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, and the planned corporate name change to
John McAfee Global Technologies, Inc.  MGT notified investors that
"[m]ajor terms of the deal include the payment to D-Vasive Inc.
stockholders of 23.8 million restricted shares of MGT stock and
$300,000 in cash.  The proposed share issuance is expected to
amount to roughly 47% of the Company on a pro-forma diluted basis
at closing."

Then, on May 26, 2016, the Company publicized that it had entered
into an agreement to acquire certain technology and assets from
Demonsaw LLC, which MGT said is "a provider of a secure and
anonymous file sharing software platform."  MGT notified investors
that "[m]ajor terms of the deal include the payment to Demonsaw
LLC members of 20.0 million restricted shares of MGT common stock.
The proposed share issuance is expected to amount to approximately
28% of the Company's common stock on a pro-forma fully diluted
basis at closing, inclusive of shares of common stock to be issued
in connection with the Company's previously announced transaction
with D-Vasive, Inc."  MGT and D-Vasive would then arrange for D-
Vasive to purchase Demonsaw in advance of the D-Vasive
Transaction, "in order to simplify these transactions, and meet
certain customary tax issues," so that MGT would acquire
Demonsaw's assets as well as D-Vasive's via the D-Vasive
Transaction.

On September 9, 2016, at MGT's  2016 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, the Company stated its the issuance of a total of
43.8 million shares of common stock in connection with the D-
Vasive Transaction had been approved by its shareholders.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants
made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose:
(1) the NYSE was unlikely to approve the listing of the 43.8
million additional shares that MGT was required to issue in
connection with the acquisitions of D-Vasive and Demonsaw; and (2)
consequently, MGT's public statements were materially false and
misleading at all relevant times.

On September 19, 2016, pre-market, MGT announced that on
September 15, 2016, it received a subpoena from the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The Company stated that it does not
believe it will be the subject of any enforcement proceedings and
is fully cooperating with the SEC's requests. Following this news,
MGT stock dropped $0.74 per share, or 22.7%, to close at $2.52 on
September 19, 2016.

Then on September 20, 2016, MGT announced that the NYSE had
informed MGT on September 19, 2016 that it would "not approve the
listing on the Exchange of the 43.8 million shares that the
Company is required to issue in order to complete the closing of
the D-Vasive [sic] merger," and that "[t]he Company and John
McAfee remain committed to closing the transaction and are
exploring alternatives."

Then on September 20, 2016, MGT announced that the NYSE would not
approve the listing of 43.8 million shares.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to
review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm's site:
http://www.bgandg.com/mgtor you may contact Peretz Bronstein,
Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein,
Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484 or via email
info@bgandg.com. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to
include their mailing address and telephone number.  If you
suffered a loss in MGT you have until November 21, 2016 to request
that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to
share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead
plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation
boutique.  Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of
litigation claims on behalf of our clients.  In addition to
representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class
action security litigation, the firm's expertise includes general
corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities
arbitration.   Attorney advertising. Prior results do not
guarantee similar outcomes.


MISONIX INC: "Scalfani" Lawsuit Alleges Securities Act Violation
----------------------------------------------------------------
RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, vs. MISONIX, INC., MICHAEL A.
MCMANUS, JR., AND RICHARD A. ZAREMBA, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-
cv-05218 (E.D.N.Y., September 19, 2016), alleges violation of the
Securities and Exchange Act relating to its disclosures of
financial and operating results for the quarter ended September
30, 2015.

MISONIX, INC. is a surgical device company that designs,
manufactures, and markets therapeutic ultrasonic products for
spine surgery, skull-based surgery, neurosurgery, wound
debridement, cosmetic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and other
surgical applications worldwide.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Laurence M. Rosen, Esq.
     Phillip Kim, Esq.
     THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.
     275 Madison Ave., 34th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Phone: (212) 686-1060
     Fax: (212) 202-3827
     Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com
            pkim@rosenlegal.com


MT. JULIET, TN: "Stafford" Suit Seeks Overtime Pay Under FLSA
-------------------------------------------------------------
SETH STAFFORD, on behalf of himself and All Others Similarly
Situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MT. JULIET, TENNESSEE, Defendant,
Case No. 3:16-cv-02507 (M.D. Tenn., September 22, 2016), seeks to
recover unpaid wages owed to them under the Fair Labor Standards
Act.

City of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee is a city located in western Wilson
County, Tennessee. A suburb of Nashville, it is approximately 17
miles east of downtown Nashville.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Nina H. Parsley, Esq.
     MICHAEL D. PONCE & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
     1000 Jackson Road, Suite 225
     Goodlettsville, TN 37072
     Phone: (615) 851-1776
     Fax: (615) 859-7033
     E-mail: nina@poncelaw.com


NATIONAL FOOTBALL: Dismissal of Super Bowl Seating Suit Upheld
--------------------------------------------------------------
Quinten Plummer, writing for SE Texas Record, reports that a
federal appeals court held up the dismissed claims of a district
judge's ruling in cutting down claims of former Super Bowl
attendees looking to for additional relief for being assigned
seats that either opened up late, offered obstructed views or were
reassigned.

The plaintiffs were looking to have their class action affirmed in
court, along with dragging Jerry Jones and his NFL Cowboys back
into the case a judge determined the contract complaints were only
between the plaintiffs and the NFL.

The district court also complied with the NFL's request for
summary judgment, so the plaintiffs sought to have that overturned
in their appeal.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against the
plaintiffs on all three issues dismissing the Cowboys and fraud
charges, upholding summary judgement and continuing to deny the
possibility of a class action.

The issues all stemmed from Super Bowl XLV, which was hosted at
Cowboys stadium. The stadium was about a year and a half old at
the time, but the Cowboys promised they could build in the
temporary seating to accommodate the marquee event.

Up until the last moment, companies contracted by the Cowboys
worked to add roughly 13,000 additional seats to a stadium that
comfortably seats 80,000 for football games. That effort saw
approximately 103,000 spectators seated at the game between the
Steelers and Packers.

However, about 400 ticket holders weren't able to be seated. About
2,000 were delayed in getting to their seats and about 850 ticket
holders had to be relocated.

And while a jury awarded the seven plaintiffs roughly $76,000 for
breach of contract in a related suit, as a result of the incident,
it refused to convict the NFL of fraud as was asserted in the
lawsuit.

The NFL apologized to the fans for the seating debacle. And after
the original verdict, the league's lead lawyer, Thad Behrens,
insisted that the NFL never tried to shift blame away from itself.

"The NFL has always accepted responsibility for the problems that
were experienced by some of its fans at Super Bowl XLV and has
attempted from the beginning to compensate them for their
genuinely received losses and inconvenience," Behrens said in a
statement.

However, the plaintiffs asserted that the Cowboys were also
culpable and so they petitioned the 5th District Court of Appeals.

The appeals court declined to acknowledge class actions formed by
three groups of fans who felt their Super Bowl experience was less
enjoyable than expected: those who were displaced, those who were
delayed and those who had an obstructed view of the field of the
video board.

While they were unified in feeling they didn't get the experience
they bargained for, the court reasoned that individual issues
predominated class complaints.

The court dismissed the complaint against the Cowboys, reasoning
that the plaintiffs hadn't submitted enough evidence to prove the
organization was anything more than a third-party vendor for an
NFL event.

As for the plaintiffs demand for a jury trial, the court argued
that the defendants had the right to summary judgement since there
was a lack of evidence the NFL attempted to defraud the ticket
holders.

Summary judgement was appropriate in this a case because there was
" "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is
entitled to judgment as a matter of law," the decision stated,
quoting the Summary Judgement section of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.


NATIONWIDE INSURANCE: 6th Cir. Sides w/ Plaintiffs in Class Suits
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jessica Karmasek, writing for Legal Newsline, reports that a
divided panel of a federal appellate court in September 2016 sided
with plaintiffs in two consolidated class action lawsuits filed
against Nationwide Insurance over a 2012 data breach, saying it
would be "unreasonable" to expect customers to wait for "actual
misuse."

"This is not a case where Plaintiffs seek to 'manufacture standing
by incurring costs in anticipation of non-imminent harm,'" Judge
Helene White wrote for the majority of a three-judge panel of the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Judge Sheryl Lipman,
for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee,
sitting by designation, joined her in the Sept. 12 decision.

"Rather, these costs are a concrete injury suffered to mitigate an
imminent harm, and satisfy the injury requirement of Article III
standing."

The plaintiffs in the cases -- which were consolidated -- appealed
to the Sixth Circuit from the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio.

Mohammad Galaria and Anthony Hancox brought their class actions,
in the Southern District of Ohio and the U.S. District Court for
the District of Kansas, respectively, after hackers breached
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company's computer network in October
2012 and stole their personal information, along with more than 1
million others.

In their complaints, the plaintiffs allege claims for invasion of
privacy, negligence, bailment and violations of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act, or FCRA.

More specifically, they argue Nationwide failed to adopt required
procedures to protect against the wrongful dissemination of their
data.

The Ohio federal court dismissed the complaints, concluding the
plaintiffs failed to state a claim for invasion of privacy, lacked
Article III standing to bring the negligence and bailment claims,
and lacked statutory standing to bring the FCRA claims.

The plaintiffs moved for reconsideration and leave to amend,
asserting the district court erred in dismissing one of their FCRA
claims. The proposed amended complaint included a new allegation
that Galaria discovered three unauthorized attempts to open credit
cards in his name.

The district court denied reconsideration and leave to amend,
concluding the plaintiffs had not demonstrated a clear error of
law, and that the proposed amendment would not cure any
deficiencies in the FCRA claim in any event.

The majority of the Sixth Circuit panel, in its 12-page ruling,
reversed the district court's ruling, concluding the plaintiffs
have Article III standing and the district court erred in
dismissing the FCRA claims for lack of subject-matter
jurisdiction. The appeals court sent the case back to the district
court for further proceedings.

The majority, pointing to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in
Spokeo v. Robins, said the "irreducible constitutional minimum" of
standing consists of three elements: a plaintiff must have 1)
suffered an injury in fact, 2) that is fairly traceable to the
challenged conduct of a defendant and 3) that is likely to be
redressed by a favorable judicial decision.

The nation's high court explained in its May decision that for an
injury to be particularized, it must affect the plaintiff in a
"personal and individual way." The injury-in-fact also must be
"concrete," which means "real" and "not abstract." But "concrete"
is not necessarily synonymous with "tangible."

"Here, Plaintiffs' allegations of a substantial risk of harm,
coupled with reasonably incurred mitigation costs, are sufficient
to establish a cognizable Article III injury at the pleading stage
of the litigation," White wrote. "Plaintiffs allege that the theft
of their personal data places them at a continuing, increased risk
of fraud and identity theft beyond the speculative allegations of
'possible future injury' or 'objectively reasonable likelihood' of
injury that the Supreme Court has explained are insufficient.

"There is no need for speculation where Plaintiffs allege that
their data has already been stolen and is now in the hands of ill-
intentioned criminals. Indeed, Nationwide seems to recognize the
severity of the risk, given its offer to provide credit-monitoring
and identity-theft protection for a full year."

In the wake of the data breach, Nationwide advised customers to
take steps to prevent or mitigate misuse of the stolen data,
including monitoring bank statements and credit reports for
unusual activity. To help, the company offered a year of free
credit monitoring and identity-fraud protection of up to $1
million through a third-party vendor.

Nationwide also suggested that customers set up a fraud alert and
place a security freeze on their credit reports. However, it did
not offer to pay for expenses associated with a security freeze.

White said a "reasonable inference" can be drawn that the hackers
in this case will use the victims' data for the fraudulent
purposes alleged in the plaintiffs' complaints.

"Thus, although it might not be 'literally certain' that
Plaintiffs' data will be misused, there is a sufficiently
substantial risk of harm that incurring mitigation costs is
reasonable," the judge wrote. "Where Plaintiffs already know that
they have lost control of their data, it would be unreasonable to
expect Plaintiffs to wait for actual misuse -- a fraudulent charge
on a credit card, for example -- before taking steps to ensure
their own personal and financial security, particularly when
Nationwide recommended taking these steps."

The Sixth Circuit majority said their conclusion is "in line" with
two recent decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Seventh Circuit.

In Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group LLC, the court held that victims
of a data breach at the department store had established injury-
in-fact by alleging a "substantial risk of harm" from the theft of
their data.

"Why else would hackers break into a store's database and steal
consumers' private information? Presumably, the purpose of the
hack is, sooner or later, to make a fraudulent charge or assume
those consumers' identities," the Seventh Circuit explained in its
decision.

The court reached a similar conclusion in Lewert v. P.F. Chang's
China Bistro Inc., where restaurant customers' credit-card data
was stolen in a data breach, saying a "primary incentive" for a
breach is to commit fraud.

"Here, Plaintiffs sufficiently allege that their injuries are
fairly traceable to Nationwide's conduct," the Sixth Circuit
wrote. "Although hackers are the direct cause of Plaintiffs'
injuries, the hackers were able to access Plaintiffs' data only
because Nationwide allegedly failed to secure the sensitive
personal information entrusted to its custody.

"In other words, but for Nationwide's allegedly lax security, the
hackers would not have been able to steal Plaintiffs' data."

Circuit Judge Alice Batchelder took a different position,
dissenting from the majority.

"We need not take sides in the existing circuit split regarding
whether an increased risk of identity theft is an Article III
injury because, even assuming that it is, the plaintiffs have
failed to demonstrate the second prong of Article III standing --
causation," she explained. "The causation element requires 'a
causal connection between the injury and the [defendant's]
conduct' -- in other words, the injury must be 'fairly traceable
to the challenged action of the defendant, and not the result of
the independent action of some third party not before the court.'"

Batchelder argues if Galaria and Hancox suffered injury, it was at
the hands of criminal third-party actors.

Their complaints do not make the factual allegations necessary to
fairly trace that injury to Nationwide, the judge said.

"The complaints simply allege that hackers were in fact able to
access the plaintiffs' personal information," Batchelder wrote.
"From that fact, the complaints conclude that Nationwide failed to
protect that information. But plaintiffs make no factual
allegations regarding how the hackers were able to breach
Nationwide's system, nor do they indicate what Nationwide might
have done to prevent that breach but failed to do.

"Galaria and Hancox's alleged injury is an increased risk of
identity theft, not the theft itself."

Batchelder said the plaintiffs' allegations are nothing more than
"sheer speculation."

The judge also took issue with the majority's reference to the
Neiman Marcus decision, arguing the Seventh Circuit overlooked the
absence of any allegation that Neiman Marcus had specifically done
anything that made the data breach easier or had failed to do
anything that could have prevented it.

"The court did not explain how the risk of identity theft could be
fairly traceable to Neiman Marcus when that risk was in fact the
result of third party criminal action," she said of the Seventh
Circuit's ruling and its ruling in P.F. Chang's.

"We should not make this same mistake."


NIANTIC INC: Faces Increasing Trespassing Lawsuits
--------------------------------------------------
Eric T. Chaffin of Chaffin Luhana LLP, writing for The Legal
Examiner, reports that for the last several weeks we've been
hearing about how people playing the popular game Pokemon Go have
been hurting themselves. Some, after crashing their cars, have
admitted to playing while behind the wheel. Others have fallen off
cliffs, broken their ankles, or been hit by cars while crossing
busy streets.

There are other risks of playing the game while not paying
attention to the world around you, however. One is the risk of
trespassing onto private property while searching for that elusive
new creature.

That's what happened recently both the U.S. and Canada. Plaintiffs
have filed lawsuits against game makers Niantic Labs and Nintendo
because the game had placed Pokemon creatures and "gyms" on
private property.

New Jersey Man Sues Pokemon Game Makers Over Issues of Trespassing

When playing the game, individuals use the camera feature on their
smartphones to see the world around them. Pokemon creatures "show
up" as virtual objects overlaid on the surroundings, and players
go after them to try to "catch" them for points. Pokemon "gyms"
and "Pokestops" are locations in which players can catch new
creatures or battle with others.

When all this happens in public places, the biggest danger is
self-injury. But when Pokemon creatures and other game locations
show up on private property, owners aren't happy.

A New Jersey resident, for example, recently filed a lawsuit
against the game makers after experiencing a number of unwanted
encounters with Pokemon Go players. Strangers were lingering
outside his home searching for creatures, and some knocked on his
door asking for access to his backyard where the creatures were
supposed to be located. He added that that game had placed gyms
and Pokestops on his property, as well.

The plaintiff is seeking class action status for his case, as he
says that his issues with privacy are not unique, and that many
other property owners have suffered trespassers playing the game.
He's also asking for personal compensation and for the game makers
to make adjustments to prevent trespassing in the future.

Canadian Woman Inundated with Strangers at Her Home

These pricing issues are not limited to the US. A woman in
Alberta, Canada also recently filed a new class-action lawsuit
against Pokemon Go game makers in August 2016.  She says that
since her property was added as a "gym," dozens of people
regularly show up at her home at all hours of the day and night.

The plaintiff explains that people have been peeking in her
windows and doors, and trying to climb over her fence. One
individual threw a drone into their yard while playing the game.
She has seen players hanging around at 1:00 a.m. in the morning,
causing her dogs to bark, which has resulted in the neighbors
complaining about the noise. On the whole, she estimates that over
100 intruders have invaded her property since the game was
released in July 2016.

The woman is the main plaintiff in a lawsuit that attorneys plan
to file as a class-action case, to represent other property owners
who have suffered trespassing as a result of the game craze. They
say that the game makers have established these Pokestops and gyms
with "callous disregard" for property owners and without
consulting with them beforehand.

The case will need to be certified by a judge before it can
continue as a class action.


PIONEER CREDIT: Faces "Harty" Suit in Western Dist. of New York
---------------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
The case is titled Pamela M. Harty, an individual, on behalf of
herself and those similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Pioneer
Credit Recovery, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Navient
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, the Defendants, Case No.
1:16-cv-00773-LJV (W.D.N.Y., Sept. 23, 2016). The Case is assigned
to Hon. Judge Lawrence J. Vilardo.

Pioneer Credit is a national company involved in credit recovery
of defaulted debt specializing in government collections.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Alexander Jerome Douglas, Esq.
          GESUND AND PAILET
11 lger Dr.
          Rochester, NY 14624
          Telephone: (585) 703 9783
          Facsimile: (504) 265 9492
          E-mail: alex@gp-nola.com


RAYMOURS FURNITURE: Class Action Waivers Enforceability Affirmed
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gail Jankowski, Esq., of Carlton Fields, in an article for
Lexology, reports that the Second Circuit issued a summary order
affirming a decision by the Southern District of New York
compelling arbitration pursuant to class-action and collective-
action waivers contained in an employment arbitration agreement.
The agreement required employees to submit all employment and
compensation-related claims to arbitration and mandated that such
claims be decided on an individual basis. The sole issue on appeal
was whether the arbitration provision's "prohibition of class or
collective adjudication of work-related claims illegally
restrict[ed] employees' substantive rights under the NLRA and the
[Norris-La Guardia Act], and [was] unenforceable under the
[Federal Arbitration Act]." The court described the landscape of
the Circuit split on this issue, noting that the National Labor
Relations Board (NLRB) and the Seventh and Ninth Circuits have
rejected the class/collective action waivers, whereas the Fifth
and Eighth Circuits have held that such waivers may be
enforceable. The Second Circuit panel then followed its own
precedent, citing its 2013 decision in Sutherland v. Ernst & Young
LLP, which is aligned with position of the Fifth and Eighth
Circuits. The court then affirmed the enforceability of the
waivers here. Patterson v. Raymours Furniture Co., Inc., Case No.
15-2820-cv (2d Cir. Sept. 2, 2016).


SANTA CLARA, CA: Class of Prisoners Certified in "Chavez" Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Nandor J. Vadas certified the action titled BRIAN CHAVEZ
and BRANDON BRACAMONTE, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, Case No. 1:15-cv-
05277-NJV (N.D. Cal.), as a class action as to all claims and
defenses at issue in the complaint.

The Class is defined as: All people who are now, or in the future
will be, incarcerated in the Santa Clara County jails.  The
subclass is defined as: All people who are now, or in the future
will be, incarcerated in the Santa Clara County jails and who have
a psychiatric and/or intellectual disability, as defined under the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et
seq., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. Section
794.

Plaintiffs Chavez and Bracamonte are appointed as representatives
of the Class, and Plaintiff Bracamonte will serve as a
representative of the Subclass.  Cooley LLP, the Prison Law
Office, and Kendall Dawson Wasley are appointed as Class counsel
to represent the interests of the Class.

The Court directed the parties to submit a proposed notice to the
Class and the method of distribution of that notice within 14 days
of the Order.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=OtKvkwVu

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Donald Specter, Esq.
          Margot Mendelson, Esq.
          PRISON LAW OFFICE
          1917 Fifth Street
          Berkeley, CA 94710
          Telephone: (510) 280-2621
          E-mail: dspecter@prisonlaw.com
                  mmendelson@prisonlaw.com

               - and -

          Jessica Valenzuela Santamaria, Esq.
          Jeffrey W. Walker, Esq.
          Addison M. Litton, Esq.
          COOLEY LLP
          3175 Hanover Street
          Palo Alto, CA 94304
          Telephone: (650) 843-5000
          E-mail: jsantamaria@cooley.com
                  jwalker@cooley.com
                  alitton@cooley.com

               - and -

          Kendall Dawson Wasley, Esq.
          PMB 233
          1520 E. Covell Blvd.
          Davis, CA 95615
          Telephone: (408) 827-5024
          E-mail: kendall@dawsonwasleylaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          James R. Williams, Esq.
          Aryn Paige Harris, Esq.
          OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
          70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor
          San Jose, CA 95110-1770
          Telephone: (408) 299-5900
          Facsimile: (408) 292-7240
          E-mail: aryn.harris@cco.sccgov.org
                  james.williams@cco.sccgov.org


SIRIUSXM CANADA: Says Aware of 'Class Action' Threats
-----------------------------------------------------
Chris Forrester, writing for Advanced Television, reports that
SiriusXM Canada, in a formal note to investors, says it is aware
of various Class Action applications having been filed with the
Superior Court in Quebec.

"The Applications seek to authorize the bringing of class action
litigation against the Company in connection with Quebec's
Consumer Protection Act and includes bringing a class action
litigation against certain other prominent Canadian companies in
the media, technology, telecommunication and financial sectors in
addition to the Company. The Company has retained legal counsel
and intends to vigorously defend itself against any potential
class action litigation," says SiriusXM Canada.

SiriusXM Canada added: "The Company does not intend to comment
further upon this matter unless and until it deems further
disclosure is appropriate or required by law".


SONY COMPUTER: Reaches Proposed Settlement on PS3 Class Action
--------------------------------------------------------------
The following statement is being issued by Garden City Group, LLC
regarding In re Sony PS3 "Other OS" Litigation.

The sole purpose of this notice is to inform you of the settlement
so that you can decide what to do.

A proposed settlement has been reached in the nationwide class
action lawsuit, In re Sony PS3 "Other OS" Litigation, United
States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No.
C-10-1811 (YGR).  This lawsuit challenges Sony Computer
Entertainment America, LLC's ("SCEA") decision to disable the
Other OS functionality from "Fat" PS3 computer entertainment
consoles through Firmware Update 3.21, released on April 1, 2010.
"Fat" PS3 consoles were consoles manufactured with the ability to
install a Linux operating system as an alternative to the game
operating system.  SCEA is the defendant and denies all
allegations.

If the settlement is approved and you are a Class Member, you may
be eligible to submit a claim for benefits.  This litigation
involves two classes. Consumer Class A is all persons in the
United States who purchased a Fat PS3 between November 1, 2006 and
April 1, 2010 from an authorized retailer for family, personal
and/or household use and used the Other OS functionality after
installation of a Linux operating system.  Consumer Class B is all
persons in the United States who purchased a Fat PS3 between
November 1, 2006 and April 1, 2010 from an authorized retailer for
family, personal and/or household use.  The benefit for both
classes is monetary, $55 (for Consumer Class A) or $9 (for
Consumer Class B).  The deadline for submitting claim forms is
December 7, 2016. Claim forms and exemplars of acceptable forms of
proof of use for each category in Consumer Class A are available
on the Settlement Website or may be obtained by calling the
Settlement Administrator.  Please note that these are not the sole
forms of acceptable proof but merely serve as examples.  If you
have questions about whether your proof for membership in Class A
is acceptable, please contact the Settlement Administrator.

You may choose to exclude yourself from the settlement by sending
your name, address, PS3 serial number and PSN Network ID along
with a statement that you wish to be excluded to the Settlement
Administrator at the address:

Sony PS Other OS Litigation
c/o Garden City Group, LLC
P.O. Box 10312
Dublin, OH 43017-5912

If you exclude yourself, you will not receive anything but will
retain your right to sue.  You may also object to the settlement
with the option to appear at the final approval hearing with your
own attorney at your cost.  If you do nothing or object to the
settlement, you will be bound by its terms and cannot later sue
SCEA. All exclusion requests and objections must be submitted by
December 7, 2016.


SOUTHERN OHIO MEDICAL: Faces "Hamm" Suit Under FLSA, OH Wage Act
---------------------------------------------------------------
JEREMY HAMM, for himself and all others similarly situated,
45661 Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHERN OHIO MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant,
Case: 1:16-cv-00935-TSB (S.D. Ohio, September 19, 2016), was
brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio
Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act.

Southern Ohio Medical Center -- http://www.somc.org/-- is a not-
for-profit hospital in Portsmouth, Ohio.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Greg R. Mansell, Esq.
     Carrie J. Dyer, Esq.
     MANSELL LAW, LLC
     1457 S. High St.
     Columbus, OH 43207
     Phone: (614) 610-4134
     Fax: (513) 826-9311
     E-mail: Greg.Mansell@Ohio-EmploymentLawyer.com
             Carrie.Dyer@Ohio-EmploymentLawyer.com


STAR BRITE: Faces "Leal" Suit in Eastern District of New York
-------------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Star Brite Flatbush Inc. The case
is captioned David Mota Leal, Enrique Mota Garcia, and Jose Marvin
Rodriguez Lopez, individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated, the Plaintiff, v. Star Brite Flatbush Inc., doing
business as: 99 Cents USA, Ajay Sarin, Anita Sarin, and Anita
Khanna, the Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-05294 (E.D.N.Y., Sept.
23, 2016).

Star Brite is retail food store in the county of Kings.

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


TACONIC PLASTICS: Hit With Class Action Over PFOA Contamination
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Gullo, writing for News10, reports that law firm Weitz &
Luxenberg has filed a class action lawsuit in Petersburgh over
PFOA contamination.

According to Weitz & Luxenberg, the lawsuit alleges that Taconic
Plastics Limited improperly disposed of the chemical
perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in the town for years, leading it to
spread into the municipal water supply and the surrounding
environment.

"This company's pollution has left its mark on Petersburgh, and
members of the community will need access to a number of resources
in the coming years to get their lives back on track," said Robin
Greenwald, head of the Environmental and Consumer Protection Unit
at Weitz & Luxenberg.

The lawsuit alleges that employees improperly disposed of
substances containing PFOA in the facility's sinks, drains, and
garbage bags and that Taconic knew or should have known the damage
this would cause to the community.

The law firm also filed a class action lawsuit over PFOA water
contamination in Hoosick Falls earlier this year.


TOTAL CARD: Faces "Judah" Suit in District of New Jersey
---------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Total Card, Inc. The case is
captioned ALI JUDAH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, the Plaintiff, v. TOTAL CARD, INC., and JOHN DOES 1-25,
the Defendants, Case No. 2:16-cv-05881-JMV-MF (D.N.J., Sept. 25,
2016). The Case is assigned to Hon. Judge John Michael Vazquez.

Total Card is a third party credit card servicer providing
services to financial institutions and non-traditional card
issuers.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          JOSEPH K. JONES, Esq.
          JONES, WOLF & KAPASI, LLC
          375 Passaic Avenue, Suite 100
          Fairfield, NJ 07004
          Telephone: (973) 227 5900
          Facsimile: (973) 244 0019
          E-mail: jkj@legaljones.com


TROJAN HORSE: Class of Plan Participants Certified in Longo Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Terrence W. Boyle granted the Plaintiffs' motion to
certify class in the lawsuit captioned GARIBALDI LONGO, et al. v.
TROJAN HORSE LTD., et al., Case No. 5:13-cv-00418-BO (E.D.N.C.).
The Class certified is defined as:

     All Trojan Horse Ltd 401(k) Plan (Plan) participants who
     contributed to the Plan through payroll deduction from
     January 1, 2011, through the date of entry of this order.

Plaintiffs Allen Hester, Carl Swanson, and Steven White are
appointed as class representatives and their counsel are appointed
as class counsel.

Judge Boyle also (i) granted in part and denied in part the
Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, (ii) denied Defendant
Ascensus Trust's motion for summary judgment, (iii) ruled that the
Plaintiffs are entitled to entry of judgment in their favor on
their claim against Defendant Ascensus Trust for breach of
fiduciary duty, and (iv) denied Ascensus' motion to strike.

As default has been entered against the remaining Defendants, the
Court finds that entry of judgment against Ascensus Trust, the
non-appearing Defendants and cross-defendants in the amount
representing the unpaid contributions to the Plan, $2,985,914, is
appropriate.  Judge Boyle ruled that the Defendants will be
jointly and severally liable for the unpaid contributions.  As the
Court finds no just reason for delay, Judge Boyle directed the
Clerk to enter judgment against Ascensus Trust, BDH Logistics, and
Capitol Expressways.

Judge Boyle further directed (i) the Class counsel to file its
affidavit in support of fees and costs not later than October 15,
2016, (ii) any response thereto must be filed not later than
November 4, 2016.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=7cS8lYg1


UNITED STATES: H-1B Visa Lottery Case to Move Forward
-----------------------------------------------------
A proposed class action lawsuit to make changes to the
controversial and opaque H-1B lottery system used by the United
States Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) under the aegis of
the Department of Homeland Security to grant 85,000 work visas
annually has been cleared to move forward after an Oregon federal
judge refused the US government's plea to dismiss the case.

U.S. District Judge Michael H. Simon rejected on Sept. 22 the
USCIS' plea to dismiss argument that as mere visa petition
beneficiaries, the individual plaintiffs lacked Article III
standing to bring their claims, and allowed the case to proceed,
reported Law360.

It noted that an employer or employee who has failed to be
selected in at least one lottery since 2013, including this year,
may complete a form to review the facts of their case for
potential class membership.  Some class members have also offered
to provide declarations to support the lawsuit as a class action.

The purpose of the lawsuit is to allow those with rejected H-1B
petitions the opportunity to re-submit petitions and receive a
place in line ahead of those who file for the first time at a
later date.  This remedy would provide 'priority' for next fiscal
year's H-1B numbers to those who had filed for an H-1B this year,
or in previous years, and were not selected in the random lottery,
noted Entry Law.

In the case, Tenrec, Inc. v. USCIS, employers and employees have
sued the government to end the current random lottery process in
place for H-1B cap subject petitions, which are at present
required to be filed in a 5 day window and randomly selected
without regard to order of filing in previous years.

The class action complaint was filed June 2, 2016.

Currently, USCIS gives 65,000 H-1B visas to foreign workers, and
an additional 20,000 H-1B visas to foreign graduates with an F-1
visa, from accredited US educational institutions.


UNITED TECHNOLOGIES: Cotromano Seeks Property Owners Class Cert.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit entitled RICHARD COTROMANO, BETHANY
COTROMANO, FRANK DECARLO, PAULETTE DECARLO, GREGORY DUNSFORD,
JENNIFER DUNSFORD, JOYCE FEATHERSTON, BILL FEATHERSTON, ROBERT T.
NEWFIELD, TRACY NEWFIELD, JOSEPH ADINOLFE, and KAY SAMSON, Class
Representatives, Individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, Pratt & Whitney Group,
A Connecticut Corporation, Case No. 9:13-cv-80928-KAM (S.D. Fla.),
move the Court to certify a class of Acreage property owners so
they can litigate on a level play field against a corporate giant
like UTC.

In their complaint, the Plaintiffs seek damages for the alleged
diminution in their property values resulting from UTC's
contamination of their neighborhood and the underlying aquifer.
The proposed class area, the Acreage, is a well-defined,
homogeneous, semi-rural, predominantly residential neighborhood in
Palm Beach County, Florida, that contains 17,409 residential
parcels.

The Plaintiffs also seek appointment as class representatives of
two individuals and five married couples, who own residential
parcels located in the Acreage.  They seek to represent all
persons, who owned residential properties in the Acreage as of
August 24, 2009 (or alternatively, as of February 10, 2010).  They
further seek appointment of seven attorneys from three law firms -
- Schlesinger Law Offices, P.A., Creed & Gowdy, P.A., and Searcy
Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. -- as class counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=oAEmcO8Q

The Adinolfe Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Scott P. Schlesinger, Esq.
          Jeffrey L. Haberman, Esq.
          SCHLESINGER LAW OFFICES, P.A.
          1212 S.E. 3RD Ave.
          Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316
          Telephone: (954) 320-9507
          Facsimile: (954) 320-9509
          E-mail: scott@schlesingerlawoffices.com
                  jhaberman@schlesingerlaw.com

               - and -

          Bryan S. Gowdy, Esq.
          CREED & GOWDY, P.A.
          865 May Street
          Jacksonville, FL 32204
          Telephone: (904) 350-0075
          Facsimile: (904) 503-0441
          E-mail: bgowdy@appellate-firm.com

               - and -

          Craig R. Zobel, Esq.
          CRAIG R. ZOBEL, P.A.
          P.O. Drawer 32065
          Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33420
          Telephone: (561) 277-1819
          Facsimile: (561) 630-9666
          E-mail: czobel@zobellawfirm.com

The Cotromano Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Mara R. P. Hatfield, Esq.
          SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A.
          2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
          West Palm Beach, FL 33409
          Telephone: (561) 686-6300
          Facsimile: (561) 383-9539
          E-mail: mrh@searcylaw.com

Palm Beach Aggregates is represented by:

          Stephen James Rapp, Esq.
          WEINBERG WHEELER HUDGINS GUNN & DIAL
          3344 Peachtree Road, Suite 2400
          Atlanta, GA 30326
          Telephone: (404) 876-2700
          Facsimile: (404) 875-9433
          E-mail: srapp@wwhgd.com

Attorneys for United Technologies Corporation, and Pratt & Whitney
Group are:

          Heather Carney Costanzo, Esq.
          Gerard Joseph Curley, Jr., Esq.
          Gregor J. Schwinghammer, Jr., Esq.
          Fabienne E. Fahnestock, Esq.
          GUNSTER YOAKLEY & STEWART, P.A.
          777 S Flagler Drive, Suite 500E
          West Palm Beach, FL 33401
          Telephone: (561) 655-1980
          Facsimile: (561) 655-5677
          E-mail: Hcostanzo@gunster.com
                  jcurley@gunster.com
                  gschwinghammer@gunster.com;
                  Ffahnestock@gunster.com

               - and -

          Alexander L. Groden, Esq.
          Andrew C. MacNally, Esq.
          Daniel R. McElroy, Esq.
          Sean W. Gallagher, Esq.
          BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT, LLP
          54 W Hubbard Street, Suite 300
          Chicago, IL 60654
          Telephone: (312) 494-4408
          Facsimile: (312) 494-4440
          E-mail: alex.groden@bartlit-beck.com
                  andrew.macnally@bartlit-beck.com
                  daniel.mcelroy@bartlit-beck.com
                  sean.gallagher@bartlit-beck.com


UNIVERSAL TAX: D&B Suit Transferred from N.D. Ill. to S.D. Ga.
--------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled D&B II Enterprises LLC, doing
business as Bain Accounting/Tax, on behalf of itself and all
others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Universal Tax
Systems, Inc., doing business as CCH Small Firm Services
a Virginia Corporation, the Defendant, Case No. CV113-5702, was
transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District
of Georgia (Savannah). The Southern District Court Clerk assigned
Case No. 4:16-mc-00012-WTM-GRS to the proceeding. The case is
assigned to Hon. Judge William T. Moore, Jr.

D&B Enterprises operates as a documentation center. The company
offers photography, webcam solutions, and video documentation for
construction.

The Defendant is represented by:

          Rachel Young Fields, Esq.
          HUNTER MACLEAN, PC
          200 E. Saint Julian Street
          P.O. Box 9848
          Savannah, GA 31412-0048
          Telephone: (912) 236 0261
          Facsimile: (912) 236 4936
          E-mail: rfields@huntermaclean.com


US INSTALLATION: Court OKs Settlement Agreement in "Meyer" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. John E. Steele, in an opinion and order, adopted the
Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed August 30,
2016, in the lawsuit captioned NEVIN MEYER, an individual, and on
behalf of all other similarly situated individuals and STEFAN
MEYER, an individual, and on behalf of all other similarly
situated individuals v. U.S. INSTALLATION GROUP, INC., a Florida
corporation, Case No. 2:15-cv-00583-JES-CM (M.D. Fla.).

The Report and Recommendation recommended that the parties'
renewed joint motion for judicial approval of the parties'
settlement agreements be granted and the Settlement Agreements be
approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide
dispute under the Fair Labor Standards Act.  No objections have
been filed and the time to do so has expired.

Judge Steele granted the parties' Renewed Joint Motion for
Judicial Approval of the Parties' Settlement Agreements and for
Dismissal with Prejudice as to named Plaintiffs.  Judge Steele
also approved the Settlement Agreement and General Release as a
fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.

Judge Steele directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment
dismissing with prejudice all claims asserted in the action by
Plaintiffs Nevin Meyer and Stefan Meyer.  Judge Steele also denied
as moot (i) Plaintiffs Nevin Meyer and Stefan Meyer's motion to
conditionally certify a collective action pursuant to the Fair
Labor Standards Act, (ii) motion for equitable tolling of the
statute of limitations and incorporated memorandum of law, and
(iii) the Defendant's motion to stay determination of the
Plaintiffs' motion to conditionally certify collective action or,
in the alternative, motion for extension of time to file response
are.

A copy of the Opinion and Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=EcMePa0k


WAL-MART STORES: Court Certifies Investors Class in Pontiac Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Susan O. Hickey entered an order in the lawsuit titled
CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually
and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. WAL-MART STORES,
INC., and MICHAEL T. DUKE, Case No. 5:12-cv-05162-SOH (W.D. Ark.):

   -- granting the Plaintiff's motion for class certification;

   -- naming The City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement
      System (PGERS) as class representative; and

   -- approving the law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman and Dowd
      LLP as class counsel and the law firm of Patton Tidwell &
      Culbertson as liaison counsel.

In its complaint, the Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants
violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 by (1) making materially false and
misleading statements, and (2) failing to disclose material
adverse facts known to the Defendants that would have made the
statements made by them not misleading.  In its Motion, the
Plaintiff moved the Court for an order certifying the case as a
class action on behalf of this class of investors:

     All persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired
     the publicly traded common stock of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
     ("Walmart") between December 8, 2011 and April 20, 2012 (the
     "Class Period"), and who were damaged by defendants' alleged
     violations of SectionSection10(b) and 20(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Excluded from the Class are
     defendants and Duke's family, the officers and directors of
     the Company, at all relevant times, members of their
     immediate families and their legal representatives, heirs,
     successors, or assigns, and any entity in which defendants
     have or had a controlling interest.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=r0mAAU8D


WASHINGTON STATE: Court Dismisses Overdraft Class Action Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tina Orem, writing for Credit Union Times, reports that a
Washington District Court judge has dismissed a class-action
lawsuit brought against Washington State Employees Credit Union
regarding its overdraft practices, marking one of the first major
decisions in a string of at least 17 lawsuits brought against
credit unions across the country since September 2015.

In a short, three-page decision issued Sept. 26, U.S. District
Judge Benjamin Settle stated that too many potential plaintiffs
living in the same state triggered an exception to the U.S. Class
Action Fairness Act, which means federal courts can't hear the
case.

"WSECU has shown that Wodja's claims meet this exception because
90% of the members of the alleged class reside in Washington and
WSECU's principal place of business is in Washington. Wodja failed
to respond to this argument, which the Court considers as an
admission that the argument has merit," the judge wrote.
"Moreover, WSECU has sufficiently shown that the Court should
decline to exercise jurisdiction over this alleged class action."

Plaintiff Todd Wodja first filed suit against WSECU almost one
year ago, claiming the credit union charged overdraft fees on
transactions even though there was enough money in his checking
account, thereby breaching the terms of its opt-in agreement.

Olympia, Wash.-based WSECU has $2.5 billion in assets and 243,000
members and the attorney for the credit union asked the court to
dismiss the case earlier this year, which the court partially
granted and partially denied in June.

The order leaves room for the plaintiff to sue in state court,
according to the judge.

"The case is in an early stage of the proceedings, especially in
light of the class action nature of the matter. If Wodja refiles
in state court, neither the discovery nor his efforts in
researching his class action issues will be wasted," Judge Settle
wrote.

McCuneWright and The Kick Law Firm did not respond to requests for
comment. WSECU's attorney, Tim Filer, also did not respond to
requests for comment. WSECU declined to comment.


WELLS FARGO: Faces "Mitchel" Class Suit in Utah
-----------------------------------------------
A lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the
District of Utah (Mitchel et al., vs. Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association & Wells Fargo & Company (Case No. 2:16-cv-00966-CW)
alleges Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Well Fargo &
Company (collectively "Wells Fargo") have engaged "in unethical,
and illegal practices called 'gaming.'" Gaming consists of, among
other things, opening and manipulating fee generating customer
accounts through often unfair, fraudulent, and unlawful means,
such as omitting signatures and adding unwanted secondary accounts
to primary accounts without permission. Other practices utilized
as part of these "gaming" schemes have included misrepresenting
the costs, benefits, fees, and/or attendant services that come
with an account or product. The complaint, filed by another firm,
claims that consumers are have been financially damaged by Wells
Fargo's "knowing theft, engagement in a continuous pattern of
fraud, [and] conspiracy to commit fraud."

Consumers residing in the State of Ohio who (i) had checking,
savings, brokerage accounts, financial advisors, mortgages, or
used any of Wells Fargo's banking services; or (ii) have been
financially harmed or damaged because of Wells Fargo's fraudulent
conduct, are encouraged to contact Sylvie Derrien, Esq. at (513)
345-8181 or at classaction@statmanharris.com for further
information about this action, without any cost of obligation.

Statman, Harris & Eyrich, LLC, which has significant experience in
consumer and securities fraud class actions and derivative
litigation, has offices in Chicago, Illinois; Cincinnati, Ohio;
Dayton, Ohio; Detroit, Michigan; and Palm Beach, Florida.
www.statmanharris.com   Attorney advertising. Prior results do not
guarantee similar outcomes.


WELLS FARGO: Ex-Worker Files Class Action Over Forced Resignation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
David Bailey, writing for Reuters, reports that two former Wells
Fargo & Co employees have filed a class action in California
seeking $2.6 billion or more for workers who tried to meet
aggressive sales quotas without engaging in fraud and were later
demoted, forced to resign or fired.

The lawsuit on behalf of people who worked for Wells Fargo in
California over the past 10 years, including current employees,
focuses on those who followed the rules and were penalized for not
meeting sales quotas.

"Wells Fargo fired or demoted employees who failed to meet
unrealistic quotas while at the same time providing promotions to
employees who met these quotas by opening fraudulent accounts,"
the lawsuit filed on Sept. 22 in California Superior Court in Los
Angeles County said.

Wells Fargo has fired some 5,300 employees for opening as many as
2 million accounts in customers' names without their
authorization. On Sept. 8, a federal regulator and Los Angeles
prosecutor announced a $190 million settlement with Wells.

The revelations are a severe hit to Wells Fargo's reputation.
During the financial crisis, the bank trumpeted being a
conservative bank in contrast with its rivals.

A Wells Fargo spokesman on Sept. 24 declined to comment on the
lawsuit.

The lawsuit accuses Wells Fargo of wrongful termination, unlawful
business practices and failure to pay wages, overtime, and
penalties under California law.

Former employees Alexander Polonsky and Brian Zaghi allege Wells
Fargo managers pressed workers to meet quotas of 10 accounts per
day, required progress reports several times daily and reprimanded
workers who fell short.

Polonsky and Zaghi filed applications matching customer requests
and were counseled, demoted and later terminated, the lawsuit
said.

While executives at the top benefited from the activity, the blame
landed on thousands of $12-per-hour employees who tried to meet
the quotas and were often required to work off the clock to do so,
the lawsuit said.

Employees with a conscience who tried to meet quotas without
engaging in fraud were the biggest victims, losing wages, benefits
and suffering anxiety, humiliation and embarrassment, the lawsuit
said.

Wells Fargo was aware many accounts were illegally opened,
unwanted, carried a zero balance, or were simply a result of
unethical business practices, the lawsuit said.

"Wells Fargo knew that their unreasonable quotas were driving
these unethical behaviors that were used to fraudulently increase
their stock price and benefit the CEO at the expense of the low
level employees," the lawsuit said.


WEST AUSTRALIA: May Face Class Action Over 'Slavery' Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------
Wendy Caccetta, writing for National Indigenous Times, reports
that the West Australian government could face unprecedented legal
action for treating Aboriginal workers like slaves more than half
a century ago.

Lawyers from a national law firm will fly to WA to investigate
whether government-sanctioned working conditions akin to slavery
operated in the State.

They will look at adding WA claims to legal action being taken in
Queensland to recover wages for Aboriginal workers. The Northern
Territory and New South Wales is also being examined.

Lawyer Rebecca Jancauskas, a partner with law firm Shine, said
even among the other States WA stood out.

"I would say the arrangements in place in WA for a period of time
were akin to institutionalised slavery," she told www.nit.com.au.

The move comes as a class action being led by Hans Pearson, the
77-year-old uncle of prominent Aboriginal leader Noel Pearson, had
its first directions hearing in the Federal Court in Queensland
two weeks ago.

Mr Pearson and about 300 other Aboriginal people have taken action
against the Queensland government to recoup wages allegedly placed
in trust on their behalf over a period of about four decades.

The matter will be back before the court on October 18.

Ms Jancauskas said since launching the Queensland action the firm
had been contacted by dozens of other individuals, their
descendants and community groups.

It was now investigating whether similar action could be taken on
behalf of people or their descendants in WA, NSW and the NT.

She said lawyers would travel to remote WA communities in the next
few months.

"In Queensland this is an action to recover wages that were held
in trust by the State government on behalf of the Indigenous
people," Ms Jancauskas said. "But in Western Australia it was not
a requirement of the legislation in force at the time that
Indigenous people receive a wage.

"So long as there was board and food provided there was no
requirement for a wage to be paid.

"As part of our investigations into litigation in Western
Australia we are considering how this sits in terms of being akin
to a form of slavery. We need to give some thought to how the
claim is structured in light of the fact we understand many people
were paid no wage at all.

"In Queensland, however, I understand it was a requirement that
Indigenous people receive a wage so therefore it is a claim to
recover the portion of their wage that was held by the
government."

Ms Jancauskas said WA landowners or individuals had needed a
government permit or agreement to employ Indigenous people.

"That permit or that agreement that the government provided to the
employer mandated the conditions of that employment," she said.
"In order for an Indigenous person to be employed by a private
landholder the government needed to rubber stamp the details of
their employment."

She said the legal action could have far-reaching consequences.

"There has been a history of slavery of American-Indian people and
there has been litigation run in the US seeking to compensate
American Indians for those years of mistreatment," she said.

"It appears there are striking parallels with Australia as well,
unfortunately, in terms of Indigenous people working for no wages
at all."

Ms Jancauskas said the situation in the NT, which was at the time
governed by the Commonwealth, was similar to Queensland.

She said the wages of Indigenous workers such as stockmen,
labourers and domestic servants were paid into a government trust.
The workers were given an allowance which was allegedly a fraction
of their pay packet.

Lawyers estimate in today's dollars Mr Pearson is owed about
$150,000.

Ms Jancauskas said in NSW it was child workers who were affected.

"The only difference is the protectionist legislation in place
governed the employment of children," she said. "I'm not presently
aware there were adults employed under that legislation, rather I
think NSW confined its protectionist regime to children.

"I believe there is a correlation to the Stolen Generation in that
the children housed in institutions were trained in vocations and
were then put to work subject to State-sanctioned agreements that
mandated that a portion of their wages needed to be held by the
State in trust.

"Other than that difference, there are no other material
differences with NSW."

Ms Jancauskas said additional proceedings could be run at the same
time as the Queensland action or separately.

"We need to decide upon the logistics but it would seem to make
sense given the close correlation that it be amalgamated and run
together, but the proceedings may need to be filed in the
different court registries," she said.


WHITEWAVE FOODS: Retirement System Files Suit Over Sale to Danone
----------------------------------------------====---------------
City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police & Fire Retirement System,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
The Whitewave Foods Company, Danone S.A., July Merger Sub Inc.,
Gregg L. Engles, Joseph S. Hardin, Jr., Stephen L. Green, Doreen
A. Wright, Michelle Goolsby, W. Anthony Vernon and Anthony J.
Magro, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-02355 (D. Col., September 19,
2016), alleges breach of fiduciary duties and violations of the
Securities Exchange Act out of Defendants' efforts to complete the
sale of Whitewave to Danone.

The WhiteWave Foods Company sells on-trend food and beverage.

Danone S.A. is a global food company built on four business lines:
Fresh Dairy Products, Early Life Nutrition, Waters and Medical
Nutrition.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     M. Gabriel McFarland, Esq.
     EVANS & MCFARLAND, LLC
     910 13th St., #200
     Golden, CO 80401
     Phone: 303-279-8300
     Fax: 303-277-1620
     E-mail: gmcfarland@emlawyers.com

        - and -

     Randall J. Baron, Esq.
     David T. Wissbroecker, Esq.
     ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
     655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
     San Diego, CA 92101
     Phone: 619.231.1058
     Fax: 619.231.7423


YAHOO INC: Faces "Myers" Suit Over Theft of Users' Account Infos
----------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Uchill, writing for The Hill, reports that two Californians
who had Yahoo accounts at the time of a 2014 breach have opened a
class action lawsuit against the company.

Jennifer J. Myers and Paul Dugas filed in the U.S. District Court
of Southern California on Sept. 23.

The two allege that Yahoo engaged in "negligent," "unfair,
unlawful, and fraudulent business practices" when it claimed that
personal information would be held securely, ultimately violating
three California statutes and the constitution of California, as
well as the Federal Stored Communications Act.

On Sept. 22, Yahoo announced it had recently discovered what it
claimed was a foreign governmental actor had breached its systems
in 2014. The company suggests anyone who has not updated account
passwords since 2014 should do so immediately.

The breach compromised 500 million accounts.

The case is JENNIFER J. MYERS and PAUL DUGAS, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.
YAHOO! INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant, Case No. 3:16-cv-
02391-CAB-WVG (S.D. Cal., September 22, 2016).

YAHOO! INC. -- https://www.yahoo.com/ -- was founded in 1994 as a
directory of web sites, but developed into a source for searches,
e-mail, shopping and news.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     David S. Casey, Jr., Esq.
     Gayle M. Blatt, Esq.
     Wendy M. Behan, Esq.
     CASEY GERRY SCHENK FRANCAVILLA BLATT &PENFIELD, LLP
     110 Laurel Street
     San Diego, CA 92101
     Phone: (619) 238-1811
     Fax: (619) 544-9232

        - and -

     Deval R. Zaveri, Esq.
     James A. Tabb, Esq.
     ZAVERI TABB, APC
     402 W. Broadway, Ste. 1950
     San Diego, CA 92101
     Phone: (619) 831-6988
     Fax: (619) 239-7800


YAHOO INC: Faces 3 Consumer Class Complaints Over Data Breach
-------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel R. Stoller, writing for Bloomberg BNA, reports that the
massive Yahoo! Inc. data breach has spurred the first three of
what are sure to be many federal court consumer class action
complaints (Havron v. Yahoo, Inc. , S.D. Ill., No. 16-cv-01075,
complaint, 9/22/16 ; Myers v. Yahoo!, Inc. , S.D. Cal., No. 16-cv-
02391, complaint, 9/22/16 ; Schwartz v. Yahoo!, Inc., N.D. Calif.,
No. 16-cv-05456, complaint, 9/23/16 ).

The hacking incident, which affected at least 500 million Yahoo
users' account information (185 PRA, 9/23/16), is sure to spark
multiple class actions that will eventually be combined in a
single federal court.

The complaints, filed Sept. 22 in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Illinois and the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of California, as well as in the Northern
District of Illinois Sept. 23, generally allege that Yahoo didn't
adequately protect the consumers personal information that may be
used by the hackers for financial gain.

Bloomberg Law(R), an integrated legal research and business
intelligence solution, combines trusted news and analysis with
cutting-edge technology to provide legal professionals tools to be
proactive advisors.

Verizon Communications Inc. has agreed to pay $4.83 billion to
purchase Yahoo. The merger hasn't been formalized and it is
unclear whether this hacking breach will have any meaningful
impact on the deal.

Regardless of whether the deal gets approved, Yahoo will face the
potentially high cost of defending multiple class actions, the
cost of which may reach into the tens of millions.

Consumer Claims

Specifically, the Illinois case alleges that under Yahoo's terms
of service and privacy policy the company was entrusted to
"strictly maintain the confidentiality of the information and
safeguard from theft or misuse." The plaintiff alleges that Yahoo
violated common law contract and tort law and violated the
Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.

The Southern District of California case alleges that the
plaintiffs were harmed because the information stolen was valuable
and may be used by identity thieves "to open new financial
accounts, incur charges in the name of class members, take out
loans, clone credit and debit cards, and other unauthorized
activities." The plaintiff brings common law invasion of privacy
claims, negligence and California consumer protection claims.
Unlike the Illinois case, the plaintiff also alleges that Yahoo
violated the Federal Stored Communications Act.

The case in the Northern District of California accuses Yahoo of
gross negligence.

A Yahoo spokeswoman told Bloomberg BNA Sept. 23 that the company
doesn't comment on ongoing litigation.


YIRENDAI LTD: Lundin Firm Files Securities Class Action Lawsuit
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lundin Law PC announced on Sept. 26 that a class action lawsuit
was filed against Yirendai Ltd. concerning possible violations of
federal securities laws between May 11, 2016 and August 24, 2016.
Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares during the
Class Period should contact the Firm before the October 25, 2016
lead plaintiff motion deadline.

No class has been certified in the action yet. Until a class is
certified, you are not considered represented by an attorney. You
may also choose to do nothing and be an absent class member.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Yirendai made
false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose: that
the Company was experiencing increasing fraud related to customer
applications for its loan products; that the implementation of new
anti-fraud regulations by the Chinese government could have a
negative impact on Yirendai's performance; and that as a result,
the Company's statements about its business, operations, and
prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable
basis. On August 24, 2016, Bloomberg reported that China imposed
limits on peer-to-peer lending and placed a new regulations cap on
individual borrowing at 1 million yuan. When this news was
released to the public, the stock price of Yirendai dropped, which
caused investors harm.

Lundin Law PC was founded by Brian Lundin -- brian@lundinlawpc.com
-- a securities litigator based in Los Angeles dedicated to
upholding shareholders' rights.







                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Marion
Alcestis A. Castillon, Ma. Cristina Canson, Noemi Irene A. Adala,
Joy A. Agravante, Valerie Udtuhan, Julie Anne L. Toledo,
Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2016. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.



                 * * *  End of Transmission  * * *