CAR_Public/160727.mbx              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

            Wednesday, July 27, 2016, Vol. 18, No. 149




                            Headlines


1-800 FLOWERS.COM: Faces "Conkli" Suit Over FLSA Violation
100 SNOW: Faces "Iames" Lawsuit Alleging Violations of FLSA
2007 GASLIGHT: Tenant May Amend Class Cert. Bid, App. Court Says
A&A AUTO: Faces "Donis" Lawsuit Alleging Violation of FLSA
ACCRETIVE HEALTH: Debt Not in Default at the Time of Collection

ADVANCED CARE: Settlement with Jefferson Radiation Has Initial OK
AKIMA INFRASTRUCTURE: Oct. 6 Case Management Conference Set
ALUM-A-FOLD: Faces "Leon" Suit Alleging Labor Law Violation
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL: Faces "Hale" Suit Alleging TCPA Violation
AMERICAN LAFRANCE: Plaintiff's Counsel Fined for Cancelled Talks

AMERICAN NATIONAL: Judge Dismissed Labor Claims in "Warman" Suit
ASSET RECOVERY: Preliminary Approval Hearing Set for Sept. 22
BARCLAYS PLC: Faces "Anderson" Suit Over Envision-AMSURG Merger
BATH & BODY: Settlement in "Jones" Suit Has Final Approval
BCB BANCORP: Dismissal of "Resua" Class Suit Upheld

BOOM CARWASH: Faces "Chiekezi" Suit Under FLSA, N.Y. Labor Laws
BURRTEC WASTE: Appeals Court Affirmed Order Slashing Counsel Fees
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS: Faces "Nedrick" Suit in D.N.J.
CHARLES SCHWAB: "Crago" Suit Alleges Securities Act Violation
CHRISTOPHER PALACE: "Ayala" Suit Seeks Minimum, Overtime Pay

CONNECTICUT: State Board of Education Faces Class Action
COOK COUNTY, IL: Judge Discarded Stroked Inmate's Suit
COOK COUNTY, IL: 7th Cir. Affirms Decertification in "Phillips"
CORAL REEF: Judge Grants Final Approval of Class Settlement
CORDIS CORP: Court Wants Briefing on Jurisdiction

CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: Wins Dismissal of "Hitchcock" Suit
DEVELOPMENTAL PATHWAYS: Faces "Bagoue" Lawsuit Under FLSA
DOMETIC CORP: Reply to "Papasan" Suit Due Aug. 19
DT MAINTENANCE: Faces Sky Management Suit in S.D.N.Y.
EDGEWELL PERSONAL: Faces "Fernandez" Suit Over False Ad

EMBASSY HEALTHCARE: India Channels Sues Under FLSA, Ohio Wage Act
EVERGREEN RECREATIONAL: Faces "Grimes" Suit Pursuant to WARN Act
EXPEDITORS & PRODUCTION: Agreed Motion to Certify Class Filed
FCA US LLC: "Vosburgh" Sues over Defective Shifters
FEDERAL INSURANCE: Bancorpsouth Sues Over Denial of Coverage

FREDERICK J. HANNA: "Schell" Settlement Granted Preliminary OK
GEO GROUP: Faces Suit Alleging Non-payment of Wages, Force Labor
GOLDEN 88: Faces "Chong" Suit Over FLSA, N.Y. Labor Law Breach
GOLDEN STATE FC: "Parson" Lawsuit Dismissed
GRAND DADDYS: May Execute Terms of "Mays" Suit Settlement

GREAT AMERICAN PLUMBING: Judge Won't Let Plaintiffs Amend Suit
HEARST COMMUNICATIONS: Nov. 10 Final Approval Hearing Set
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN: Bid for Attorneys' Fees Granted in Part
HOGAN TRANSPORTATION: Faces "Fairfax" Suit Under FLSA, Wage Act
IDEAL CONCEPTS: Faces "Bruno" Suit Under FLSA, Penn. Wage Act

INGRAM & ASSOCIATES: Faces "Smith-Parris" Suit in D.N.J.
INSMED INC: Faces "Hoey" Suit Alleging Securities Act Violation
INTREXON CORP: Response to "Hoffman" Suit Deferred
INTREXON CORP: Response to "Gibrall" Suit Deferred
IWS INC: Judge Narrows Plaintiffs' Bid for Attorneys' Fees

JANSSEN RESEARCH: Faces "Hardenbrook" Suit in La. Over Xarelto
JUNO THERAPEUTICS: Faces "Veljanoski" Securities Suit in Wash.
KENTUCKY: Woodcock's Suit Amendments Fails to Win Judge's Nod
KEVIN B. WILSON LAW: Faces "Tucker" Suit in M.D. Fla.
KRISPY KREME: "Lomax" Sues over Shady Merger Deal

LA MANSION: Faces "Castillo" Suit Alleging Violation of FLSA
LANNETT CO: AHOLD USA Sues Over Alleged Violation of Sherman Act
LCC INTERNATIONAL: Faces Suit in Mo. Alleging Violation of FLSA
LOMA RENTALS: Faces "Arriola" Lawsuit Alleging FLSA Violation
LONDON CORRECTIONAL: Sabo's Motions Nixed Prior to Sept 6 Reply

MARKETO INC: Faces "Rosati" Securities Suit Over Sale to Vista
MATCH GROUP: Glancy Prongay & Bragar Eagel Named Co-Lead Counsel
MDL 2067: "Kiossovski" Complaint Survives Dismissal Bid
MDL 2672: $15-Bil. Settlement in 2.0L Cars Suit Wins Initial OK
MDL 2672: VW Working on New Settlement Proposal for 3.0L Cars

MERCANTILE ADJUSTMENT: Faces "Maslaton" Suit in E.D.N.Y.
MIDLAND CREDIT: Faces "Hofstatter" Suit Over FDCPA Breach
MINNEAPOLIS, MN: CA Affirms Ruling in "DRB #24" Suit
MONTGOMERY: Bid to Dismiss "McConville" Suit Denied
MORAL HOME: Faces "Guerrero" Suit Alleging Violation of FLSA

NASSAU COUNTY, NY: Discovery Underway in "Weinstein" Suit
NITRO FLUIDS: Faces "Garcia" Suit Alleging Violation of FLSA
NORTH AMERICAN BANCARD: Offer of Judgment Did Not Moot Claims
NY F&B: Magistrate Judge's Report Adopted, "Reyes" Suit Dismissed
OMNI HEALTHCARE: Faces Mich. Lawsuit Alleging Violation of FLSA

OPAI THAI: "De Los Santos" Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime Wages
ORACLE CORP: Faces "Van Der Fluit" Suit Over Opower Acquisition
ORTHOTICS ON THE GO: Faces "Harris" Sales Consultants' Lawsuit
PAYPAL INC: Final Settlement Approval Hearing Set for Dec. 14
PENNSYLVANIA: Judge Approves Terms of Settlement in Autism Suit

PFIZER INC: Faces "Graner" Suit in Cal. Over Labeling of Viagra
PINEWOOD HEALTH: "Pippen" Suit Moved from Cir. Ct. to W.D. Ark.
PLASTER & WALD: Faces "Benson" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
PLOY DEE: Court Wanted Settlement Agreement Revised
PNC BANK: "Cruz" Sues Over Share Price Drop

PREMIER HOME: "Blagodar" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
QUAKER OATS: "Cooper" Suit Over Labeling Transferred to N.D. Ill.
QLIK TECHNOLOGIES: Board Faces "Charles" Suit Over Sale to Thoma
QLIK TECHNOLOGIES: Jeweltex Sues to Stop Sale to Thoma Bravo
RA MULLIN: "Graley" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay

ROSA MEXICANO: "Suarez" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
SACRAMENTO, CA: Faces "Mal Pratap" Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
SAFEWAY INC: Calif. Court Okays Removal of "Prewitt" Suit
SEECO INC: Class Counsels Triumph Over Class Representative
SEVENTH GENERATION: Parties Agree to Stay "Tsan" Suit

SHARP ELECTRONICS: 3rd Cir. Appeal Filed in "Popejoy" Class Suit
SINGING RIVER: Claims in "Montgomery" Suit Narrowed
SONOMA COUNTY: Settlement Approval Hearing Moved to Oct. 4
STARBUCKS CORP: Bid to Stay "Strumlauf" Suit Granted in Part
SUPREME SERVICE: Faces "Blake" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA

TACO BELL: Judge Granted in Part Bid for Fees in Wage & Hour Suit
TARGET CORP: Faces "Knoll" Lawsuit Alleging Violation of ERISA
THERANOS INCORPORATED: Faces "R.C." Suit in D. Ariz.
TITAN PETROSERVICES: Faces "Edwards" Suit Over FLSA Violation
TURK COLLECTORS: Faces "Murray-Sims" Suit in D.N.J.

TWINS GROUP: Faces "Combs" Suit Under FLSA, Ohio Wage Act
UBER TECHNOLOGIES: Aug. 18 Hearing on Bid to Enforce Subpoenas
UNITED STATES: 9th Cir. Interprets Agreement and Remands Suit
URANIUM ENERGY: Judge Granted Bid to Dismiss "Stephens" Suit
VIACOM INC: Sunrise Retirement Suit Questions Viacom Leadership

VIGILANT INSURANCE: No Breach in Obtaining Consent, Judge Says


                            *********


1-800 FLOWERS.COM: Faces "Conkli" Suit Over FLSA Violation
----------------------------------------------------------
VIRGINIA CONKLIN, and ALYSON CLARK, v. 1-800 FLOWERS.COM, INC.
Case: 2:16-cv-00675-ALM-EPD (S.D. Ohio, July 12, 2016), seeks to
recover monetary damages, liquidated damages, interest and costs,
including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs under the Fair
Labor Standards Act, the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act, and
the Ohio Prompt Pay Act, and also to recover for breach of
contract claims.

Flowers.Com, Inc. is a provider of gourmet food and floral gifts
for all occasions.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     William F. Cash III, Esq.
     Brandon L. Bogle, Esq.
     LEVIN, PAPANTONIO, THOMAS, MITCHELL, RAFFERTY & PROCTOR,
     P.A.
     316 South Baylen Street, Suite 600
     Pensacola, FL 32502
     Phone: (850) 435-7059
     E-mail: bcash@levenlaw.com
             bbogle@levenlaw.com

        - and -

     David H. Grounds, Esq.
     Timothy J. Becker, Esq.
     Molly E. Nephew, Esq.
     JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
     4444 Cedar Street, Suite 1800
     St. Paul, MN 55101
     Phone: (612) 436-1800
     Fax: (612) 436-1801
     E-mail: dgrounds@johnsonbecker.com
             tbecker@johnsonbecker.com
             mnephew@johnsonbecker.com


100 SNOW: Faces "Iames" Lawsuit Alleging Violations of FLSA
-----------------------------------------------------------
KAREN IAMES, Individually, and On Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated, v. 100 SNOW LLC, PARMINDER SINGH, HARRY SINGH, and PENNY
BROWN, Case 1:16-cv-01891-RLY-MJD (S.D. Ind., July 15, 2016),
alleges willful violations by the Defendants of the federal Fair
Labor Standards Act.

100 SNOW LLC operates many convenience stores in Indiana and the
State of Ohio.

The Plaintiff is represented by;

     James A. Piatt, Esq.
     Anne Medlin Lowe, Esq.
     RILEY WILLIAMS & PIATT, LLC
     Hammond Block Building
     301 Massachusetts Avenue
     Indianapolis, IN 46204
     Phone: (317) 633-5270
     Fax: (317) 426-3348

        - and -

     Jason T. Brown, Esq.
     JTB LAW GROUP, LLC
     Phone: (877) 561-0000
     Fax:  (855) 582-5297
     E-mail: jtb@jtblawgroup.com


2007 GASLIGHT: Tenant May Amend Class Cert. Bid, App. Court Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jennifer Hensal of the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth
District, affirmed the Summit County Court of Common Pleas' order
granting the amended motion to certify a class action in the
appealed case of ROBERT MOZINGO, Appellee, v. 2007 GASLIGHT OHIO,
LLC, et al., Appellants, C.A. No. 27759 (Ohio Ct. App.)

Robert Mozingo lived at the Gaslight Village Mobile Home Park in
Tallmadge since 2002. At the time he moved into the park, George
and Patricia Waliga owned it. The Waligas purchased the park in
2007, they included their tenants' gas usage in their monthly
rent. Around 2001, however, they began receiving extremely high
monthly gas bills, so they decided to place a meter on each unit
and charge everyone for their gas use separately. They hired a
third-party company to read the individual meters for them each
month.

Mozingo discovered that his monthly gas bills contained an
undisclosed $5.00 fee. He also discovered that he was paying a
higher rate for gas than the park was paying the gas company.
Mozingo has never had a written lease with the park's owners, but
he has received a copy of the park's rules. Under those rules, he
is responsible for paying for the natural gas he uses each month.
Mozingo filed a class action complaint against the Waligas and
Gaslight Ohio on behalf of all of its tenants, alleging breach of
contract and violations of Revised Code Section 3733.11.

The court granted Mozingo's motion for class certification, to
which the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth District reversed and
remanded the case so that the trial court could conduct a rigorous
analysis of all of the prerequisites for class action
certification. On remand, Mozingo filed an amended motion to
certify class action, which the trial court granted. The Waligas
and Gaslight Ohio have jointly appealed the decision.

Judge Hensal affirmed the judgment of the Summit County Court of
Common Pleas.

A copy of Judge Hensal's decision and journal entry dated July 6,
2016, is available at http://goo.gl/sE9YHIfrom Leagle.com.

SCOTT J. FLYNN -- scott@flynnkeithlaw.com -- at Flynn Law Office
LLC, for Appellants

JONATHAN D. GREENBERG -- jdg@walterhav.com -- at Walter/Haverfield
LLP, for Appellant

BRIAN W. ZIMMERMAN -- bzimmerman@zimmerlaw.com -- at Zimmerman,
Axelrad, Meyer Stern & Wise, for Appellant

THOMAS J. CONNICK -- tconnick@connicklawllc.com -- at Connick Law
LLC, for Appellee

GEORGE W. COCHRAN, Attorney at Law, for Appellee


A&A AUTO: Faces "Donis" Lawsuit Alleging Violation of FLSA
----------------------------------------------------------
LEONEL ROMELI MIX DONIS, and all others similarly situated under
29 U.S.C. 216(b), v. A&A AUTO PRIDE, L.L.C. d/b/a SUNNY ISLES
MOBIL, ALEXANDER AYZEN, and DAGOBERTO FREITAS, Case 1:16-cv-23039-
RNS (S.D. Fla., July 13, 2016), arises under the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

A&A Auto Pride LLC is in the general automotive repair shops
industry located in Sunny Isles Beach, Florida.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     J.H. Zidell, Esq.
     J.H. ZIDELL, P.A.
     300 71st Street, Suite 605
     Miami Beach, FL 33141
     Phone: (305) 865-6766
     Fax: (305) 865-7167
     E-mail: ZABOGADO@AOL.COM


ACCRETIVE HEALTH: Debt Not in Default at the Time of Collection
---------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, affirmed the
district court's grant of summary judgment to the appellee in the
appealed case MAHALA A. CHURCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACCRETIVE
HEALTH, INC., Defendant-Appellee, No. 15-15708 (11th Cir.)

Accretive Health, Inc., working for Providence Hospital sent a
letter to Mahala Church advising her that she owed a debt to the
Hospital.

Acting on the letter, Church filed a putative class action against
Accretive Health and alleges that Accretive Health violated the
Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) by not including in
its letter certain disclosures required by the Act. Church does
not allege in her complaint that she suffered actual damages from
Accretive Health's failure to include the allegedly required
disclosures. Rather, Church simply alleges that upon receiving the
letter in question, she was very angry and cried a lot.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Accretive
Health. Church appealed the decision, questioning whether, at the
time the debt at issue was obtained by Accretive Health, the debt
was in default, as contemplated by the FDCPA.

The United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, affirmed the
district court's grant of summary judgment.

A copy of the Eleventh Circuit's per curiam dated July 6, 2016 is
available at http://goo.gl/inPi2jfrom Leagle.com.

Kenneth J. Riemer -- Earl Price Underwood, Jr. --
epunderwood@alalaw.com -- at Underwood & Riemer, P.C., for
Plaintiff-Appellant Mahala A. Church,

Andrew Brian Clubok -- andrew.clubok@kirkland.com -- Claire
McCusker Murray -- claire.murray@kirkland.com -- Jennifer Levy --
jennifer.levy@kirkland.com -- Kathleen Ann Brogan --
kathleen.brogan@kirkland.com -- Kellen S. Dwyer -- at Kirkland &
Ellis, LLP; Sandy G. Robinson -- sgr@cabaniss.com - at Cabaniss,
Johnston, Gardner, Dumas & O'Neal LLP, for Defendant-Appellee
Accretive Health, Inc.

The United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit panel
consists of Chief Judge Ed Carnes, Circuit Judge Joel F. Dubina
and District Judge Paul C. Huck.


ADVANCED CARE: Settlement with Jefferson Radiation Has Initial OK
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, JEFFERSON RADIATION ONCOLOGY, v. ADVANCED CARE
SCRIPTS, INC, Civil Action No. 15-1399 (E.D. La.), District Judge
Jane Triche Milazzo granted the parties' Motion for Preliminary
Approval of Settlement and Class Certification.

The case alleges massive junk faxing in violation of the Junk Fax
Prevention Act of 2005 (JFPA), where, as Plaintiff alleged, junk
faxes sent by Defendant failed to include a clear notice to their
recipients of the right to stop future junk faxes, as required by
the JFPA.

The certified settlement class, for settlement purposes only,
consists of all persons and entities that received facsimile
transmissions from Defendants or its vendor that advertise,
promote, or describe Defendant's products or services and
do not contain the notice required by 47 U.S.C. Sec.
227(b)(1)(C)(iii), (b)(2)(D), (b)(2)(E), (d)(2) or 47 C.F.R. Sec.
64.1200(a)(4)(iii)-(vii), during the period from April 29, 2011 to
February 19, 2016

In addition, the Court ordered the following: (1) Jefferson
Radiation is appointed as Class Representative; (2) George Recile,
Preston Hayes, Ryan Monsour, Matthew Sherman, and Patrick Follette
of the Law Offices of Chehardy Sherman Williams LLP are appointed
class counsel and settlement class counsel; (3) Angeion Group is
appointed Notice and Settlement Administrator; (4) Notices, in the
forms submitted as Exhibit 3 to the motion, are authorized to
class members with deadlines for Opt-Outs and Objections set on
October 3, 2016; and (4) the Fairness Hearing is scheduled for
November 30, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.

A copy of the Court's Order dated July 18, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/X9EQiNfrom Leagle.com.

Advanced Care Scripts, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig
Isenberg -- cisenberg@barrassuosdin.com -- Barrasso, Usdin,
Kupperman, Freeman & Sarver, LLC, Hoai-Mi Vu, O'Melveny & Myers,
LLP, pro hac vice, Randall William Edwards -- redwards@omm.com --
O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, pro hac vice & Scott Michael Voelz --
svoelz@omm.com -- O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, pro hac vice.


AKIMA INFRASTRUCTURE: Oct. 6 Case Management Conference Set
-----------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton ordered that a Case Management
Conference shall be held on October 6, 2016, in the case of SARAH
RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. AKIMA INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, LLC, et
al., Defendants, Case No. 16-cv-03607-PJH (N.D. Calif.). A copy of
the Court's order dated July 18, 2016, is available at
http://goo.gl/kFQoRIfrom Leagle.com.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9, parties are required to file a
joint case management statement, not less than seven days before
the conference, addressing each of the items listed in the
"Standing Order For All Judges of the Northern District --
Contents of Joint Case Management statement" as attached in the
order and which can also be found on the court's website.
Following the conference, the court will enter its own Case
Management and Pretrial Order.

Akima Infrastructure Services, LLC, et al., Defendants,
represented by Gregory G. Iskander -- giskander@littler.com --
Littler Mendelson, P.C.


ALUM-A-FOLD: Faces "Leon" Suit Alleging Labor Law Violation
-----------------------------------------------------------
OSVALDO LEON, as an individual and on behalf of all similarly
situated, v. ALUM-A-FOLD PACIFIC, INC., a California Corporation;
and DOES 1 through 100, Case no: BC 626918 (Cal. Super., Country
of Los Angeles, July 12, 2016), seeks to recover alleged unpaid
wages, and penalties under the Business and Professional Code,
Labor Code and Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order.

Alumafold Pacific, Inc. manufactures pre painted steel and
aluminum coils, and window coverings such as rail, coil, foamwood
and titrod coverings to fabricators.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Paul K. Haines, Esq.
     Tuvia Korobkin, Esq.
     Fletcher W. Schmidt, Esq.
     Andrew J. Rowbotham, Esq.
     HAINES LAW GROUP, APC
     2274 East Maple Avenue
     El Segundo, CA 90245
     Phone: (424)292-3250
     Fax: (424) 292-2355
     E-mail: phaines@haineslawgroup.com
             tkorobkin@haineslawgroup.com
             fschmidt@haineslawgroup.com
             arrowbotham@haineslawgroup.com


AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL: Faces "Hale" Suit Alleging TCPA Violation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NATHAN HALE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive, and each of them, Case 2:16-cv-05263 (C.D.
Cal., July 17, 2016), alleges that Defendants negligently,
knowingly, and/or willfully contacted Plaintiff on Plaintiff's
cellular telephone in violation of the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act.

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. is a company in the business of
providing insurance services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
     Adrian R. Bacon, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
     324 S. Beverly Dr. #725
     Beverly Hills, CA 90212
     Phone: (877) 206-4741
     Fax: (866)633-0228
     E-mail: tfriedman@toddflaw.com
             abacon@toddflaw.com


AMERICAN LAFRANCE: Plaintiff's Counsel Fined for Cancelled Talks
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, ACOSTA, et al. v. AMERICAN LAFRANCE, LLC, et al.,
Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio approved a request for
sanctions filed by the Defendants' Counsel, Jan Miller, against
Plaintiffs' law firm, Napoli Bern.

Defendants cite the Plaintiff firm's bad faith cancellation of a
scheduled mediation required under the court's mandatory
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Plan.

Mr. Miller, a partner at Thompson Coburn, LLP, is one of defendant
Federal Signal's attorneys.  Mr. Miller was then en route to
Buffalo to attend the mediation, but was forced to return to his
St. Louis law office causing unnecessary expenses to Federal
Signal.

The following costs were incurred: (1) $3,600 representing Mr.
Miller's billable time at $400/hr. in preparing for the cancelled
mediation; (2) $789.83 for wasted air fare, hotel and meal
expenses; and (3) $1,749 representing 6.3 hours at $255/hr. for
Audrey Mense, an associate at Thompson Coburn, and $330/hr. for J.
David Duffy (Duffy), a partner.

The Court denied Plaintiffs' objection as regards arbitrary
billing rates.  The Court said Federal Signal had sufficiently
established that Miller and Duffy's hourly rates are respectively
$400/hr. and $330/hr.

A copy of the Court's order dated July 12, 2016, is available at
http://goo.gl/VWBfMlfrom Leagle.com.

Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp., Defendant, represented by Ernest
F. Koschineg -- ekoschineg@c-wlaw.com -- Cipriani & Werner, P.C. &
Morgan A. Sack, Cipriani & Werner, P.C..

Seagrave Fire Apparatus, LLC, Defendant, represented by Russell S.
Massey -- massey@litchfieldcavo.com -- Litchfield Cavo LLP.

Federal Signal Corporation, Defendant, represented by James David
Duffy -- dduffy@thompsoncoburn.com -- Thompson Coburn LLP, pro hac
vice, John J. Jablonski -- jjablonski@goldbergsegalla.com --
Goldberg Segalla LLP & Audrey D. Mense --
amense@thompsoncoburn.com -- Thompson Coburn LLP, pro hac vice.


AMERICAN NATIONAL: Judge Dismissed Labor Claims in "Warman" Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Ronnie Abrams of the Southern District of New York
granted defendant's motion to dismiss in the case JORDAN WARMAN,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE, a 501(c)(3)
organization, Defendant, No. 15-CV-5486 (RA) (S.D.N.Y.).

American National Standards Institute (ANSI) is a not-for-profit
corporation incorporated under the laws of New York and doing
business in New York City and throughout the United States.

In June 2013, ANSI accepted Jordan Warman as an Assessor Trainee,
and required the latter to execute an Assessor Agreement. The
agreement contains a choice-of-law provision, which provides that
the agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New
York, exclusive of New York's conflict of interest rules.

As an Assessor Trainee, Warman was required to travel and attend
mandatory, multi-day training sessions in Washington D.C.,
Maryland, and New Jersey. On July 14, 2015, Plaintiff filed a
class action complaint seeking redress under the Fair Labor
Standards Act and New York Labor Law for ANSI's failure to pay him
for the time spent at, preparing for, and traveling to the
mandatory trainings. On October 9, 2015, ANSI moved to dismiss
Warman's New York Labor Law claims.

Judge Abrams granted defendant's motion to dismiss the New York
Labor Law claims.

A copy of Judge Abrams opinion and order dated July 6, 2016, is
available at http://goo.gl/n1CX77from Leagle.com.

Jordan Warman, Individually, Plaintiff, represented by Alisa Ann
Martin -- alisa@amartinlaw.com -- at Amartin Law, PC; Travis Jang-
Busby -- at San Diego County Law Offices; Todd Seth Garber
-- tgarber@fbfglaw.com -- at Finkelstein Blankinship, Frei-
Pearson & Garber, LLP

Jordan Warman, Plaintiff, represented by Todd Seth Garber --
tgarber@fbfglaw.com -- at Finkelstein Blankinship, Frei- Pearson &
Garber, LLP

American National Standards Institute, Defendant, represented by
Ashley Jean Hale -- ashley.hale@morganlewis.com -- Michael
Jonathan Puma -- michael.puma@morganlewis.com -- at Morgan Lewis &
Bockius, LLP


ASSET RECOVERY: Preliminary Approval Hearing Set for Sept. 22
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, MEENA ARTHUR DATTA, Plaintiff, v. ASSET RECOVERY
SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant, Case No. 15-CV-00188-LHK (N.D. Calif.),
District Judge Lucy H. Koh will hold a hearing September 22, 2016,
to consider preliminary approval of a settlement agreement.

The pretrial conference set for July 28, 2016, and the two-day
jury trial set for August 15, 2016m are vacated.

In addition, the Court orders the parties to file on August 18,
2016, a statement that provides case law and legal authority
supporting approval of a class action settlement where, as in the
instant case, there is no injunctive relief and there are no
individual distributions to Class Members from the common fund.

A copy of the Court's Order dated July 18, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/CjdMdgfrom Leagle.com.

Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC, Defendant, represented by David Ian
Dalby -- ddalby@hinshawlaw.com -- Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP &
Justin Michael Penn -- jpenn@hinshawlaw.com -- Hinshaw and
Culbertson LLP.


BARCLAYS PLC: Faces "Anderson" Suit Over Envision-AMSURG Merger
---------------------------------------------------------------
BRIAN ANDERSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, v. WILLIAM A. SANGER, MICHAEL L. SMITH, RONALD A.
WILLIAMS, CAROL J. BURT, MARK MACTAS, LEONARD M. RIGGS, M.D.,
RICHARD J. SCHNALL, JAMES D. SHELTON, and BARCLAYS PLC, Case No.
12561 (Del. Ch., July 15, 2016), is a shareholder lawsuit for
alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by Envision Healthcare
Holdings, Inc. Board of Directors over their plan to merge with
AMSURG Corp.

Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. is a provider of inpatient
physician services and medical transportation services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     James R. Banko, Esq.
     Derrick B. Farrell, Esq.
     FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
     20 Montchanin Road, Suite 145
     Wilmington, DE 19807
     Phone: (302) 482-3182
     E-mail: jbanko@faruqilaw.com
             dfarrell@faruqilaw.com

        - and -

     Nadeem Faruqi, Esq.
     FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
     685 Third Avenue, 26th Fl.
     New York, NY 10017
     Phone: (212) 983-9330
     Fax: (212) 983-9331
     E-mail: nfaruqi@faruqilaw.com

        - and -

     Juan E. Monteverde, Esq.
     MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC
     The Empire State Building
     350 Fifth Avenue, 59th Fl.
     New York, NY 10118
     Phone: (212) 971-1341
     Fax: (212) 601-2610
     E-mail: jmonteverde@monteverdelaw.com


BATH & BODY: Settlement in "Jones" Suit Has Final Approval
----------------------------------------------------------
In the case, ADAM JONES, Plaintiff, v. BATH & BODY WORKS, INC., et
al. Defendants, Case No. CV 13-5206 FMO (AJWx), (C.D. Calif.),
District Judge Fernando M. Olguin granted the Motion for Final
Approval of Class Action Settlement, Motion for Attorney's Fees,
Costs and Expenses, and for Class Representative Incentive Awards,
pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and the Order.

Plaintiff Adam Jones shall be paid a service payment of $8,000 and
plaintiff Brooke Johnson shall be paid a service payment of
$5,000.

Class counsel shall be paid $675,000 in attorney's fees, and
$15,560 in costs. The settlement administrator, CPT Group, Inc.,
shall be paid $125,000 for its fees and expenses and the
California Labor and Workforce Development Agency shall be paid
the amount of $7,500.

A copy of the Court's Order dated, July 11, 2016, is available at
http://goo.gl/9aUqrofrom Leagle.com.

Bath and Body Works, LLC, Defendant, represented by Beth A. Gunn -
beth.gunn@ogletreedeakins.com -- Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and
Stewart PC, Lori A. Bowman -- lori.bowman@ogletreedeakins.com --
Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart PC, Adam J. Rocco --
ajrocco@vorys.com -- Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP, Alexander
Miller Chemers -- alexander.chemers@ogletreedeakins.com --
Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart PC, Andrew C. Smith --
acsmith@vorys.com -- Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP, pro hac
vice, Catherine J. Coble -- catherine.coble@ogletreedeakins.com --
Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart PC & John L. Landolfi --
jllandolfi@vorys.com -- Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP.


BCB BANCORP: Dismissal of "Resua" Class Suit Upheld
---------------------------------------------------
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, affirmed the
Law Division's order dismissing the case, JOSE & CHERYL RESUA, and
TRACY JAMES, individually and on behalf of those similarly
situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BCB BANCORP, INC. and BCB
COMMUNITY BANK, Defendants-Respondents, No. A-2792-14T1 (N.J.
Super. App. Div.)

Plaintiffs Jose and Cheryl Resua, and Tracy James, individually
and on behalf of those similarly situated, filed a putative class
action against defendants BCB Bancorp, Inc. and BCB Community Bank
alleging age discrimination under the Law Against Discrimination,
which makes it unlawful for any person to refuse to sell, contract
with, trade, provide services or otherwise do business with any
other person on the basis of the other person's age, N.J.S.A.
10:5-12(l).

In their complaint, plaintiffs identified (1) Senior Checking;(2)
Choice Checking;(3) Money Market Checking;(4) Easy Checking;
and(5) Campus Checking,  the five different types of personal
checking accounts that defendant BCB Community Bank offers only to
persons age sixty years old and older.

They characterize the terms offered by defendants to customers who
are age sixty years old and older as an unlawful age
discrimination policy. The members of the class claim to be
aggrieved by the denial of access to the personal checking and
savings accounts.

Defendants argue that a plain reading of the salient language in
N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(l) reveals the fallacy in plaintiff's argument.
Defendants emphasize that they have not denied plaintiffs access
to their financial services, but only limited certain types of
checking accounts to customers over the age of sixty. Defendants
moved to dismiss plaintiffs's complaint for failure to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 4:6-2(e).

Defendants's motion came for disposition before Judge Joseph A.
Turula. After considering the arguments of counsel and carefully
analyzing the relevant section of the Law Against Discrimination
under the applicable standard of review, Judge Turula granted
defendants's motion and dismissed plaintiffs's complaint with
prejudice.

A copy of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division's
per curiam dated June 9, 2016, is available at
http://goo.gl/Oi1QWFfrom Leagle.com.

Thomas Paciorkowski and John H. Sanders, II, for appellants

Steven R. Marino -- steven.marino@dlapiper.com -- Joseph D.
Guarino -- joseph.guarino@dlapiper.com -- at DLA Piper LLP

The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division panel
consists of Judges Jose L. Fuentes, J. Christopher Gibson and
Ellen L. Koblitz.


BOOM CARWASH: Faces "Chiekezi" Suit Under FLSA, N.Y. Labor Laws
---------------------------------------------------------------
FABIAN CHIEKEZI, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, v. BOOM CARWASH CORP., RUFINO CASTRO
individually and as owner, officer, director, shareholder and/ or
principal of BOOM CARWASH CORP. and JOHN DOES 1 through 10 (aka
Gero and Salome), Case 1:16-cv-03918-RJD-ST (E.D.N.Y., July 14,
2016), alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the New
York State Labor Law, the New York State Department of Labor
Regulations and for violations of laws prohibiting disability
discrimination and the failure to reasonably accommodate
disabilities under the New York State Human Rights Law and the New
York City Human Rights Law.

Defendants are in the business of providing cleaning and detailing
services for vehicles.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Robert J. Valli Jr., Esq.
     VALLI KANE & VAGNINI, LLP
     600 Old Country Road, Suite 519
     Garden City, NY 11530
     Phone: (516) 203-7180


BURRTEC WASTE: Appeals Court Affirmed Order Slashing Counsel Fees
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Justice Douglas P. Miller, of the Court of Appeals of California,
Fourth District, Division Two, affirmed the award of attorneys'
fees in the appealed case of LEONEL SILVA, Plaintiff and
Appellant, v. BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant and
Respondent, No. E062866 (Cal. Ct. App.)

Leonel Silva was employed by Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. On
December 5, 2012, Silva filed a complaint for recovery of unpaid
wages pursuant to section 201 and Industrial Welfare Commission
Order No. 4., and alleged that he was not paid for 342 hours of
double-time, or 3,460 hours of overtime pay between 2008 and 2011.
Also, he was not paid the statutorily required rest periods for
886 days between September 16, 2008, and May 16, 2011.

The jury in San Bernardino County Superior Court returned its
verdict in favor of Silva and concluded that Silva was entitled to
overtime hours, rest breaks and that Burrtec willfully failed to
pay Silva overtime wages. The jury awarded Silva $75,802.35 in
overtime wages and $12,959.40 in penalties.

Silva requested $526,634.50 in attorneys' fees and $43,778.03 in
costs. Silva was represented by the law firm of Collins, Collins,
Muir & Stewart, LLP. Silva requested fees pursuant to sections
98.2, subdivision (c), 218.5, and 1194.

The trial court granted Silva's attorneys' fees, but significantly
reduced the amount that was requested by him. The trial court
ruled that Nicole A. Davis Tinkham would be allowed $135,919;
Brian K. Stewart would be allowed $51,975; Valerie Gallo would be
awarded $22,064; and the paralegals would be awarded $3,000. The
total award of attorneys' fees was $212,958.50.

Silva contends on appeal that the trial court slashed reasonable
hours expended on litigation for no stated reason. The reduction
of partner, associate, paralegal and clerk time was an abuse of
its discretion.

Justice Miller affirmed the trial court's award of attorneys'
fees.

A copy of Justice Miller's opinion dated July 6, 2016, is
available at http://goo.gl/Vuic1lfrom Leagle.com.

Nicole A. Davis Tinkham -- ndavis@ccmslaw.com -- Christian E. Foy
Nagy -- cnagy@ccmslaw.com -- Ryan Stenzel  -- rstenzel@ccmslaw.com
-- at Collins Muir + Stewart, for Plaintiff and Appellant

Diane Kimberlin -- dkimberlin@littler.com -- at Littler Mendelson,
for Defendant and Respondent

The Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District Division Two
panel consists of Acting Presiding Justice Art W. Mckinster, and
Justices Douglas P. Miller and Marsha G. Slough.


CAPITAL ACCOUNTS: Faces "Nedrick" Suit in D.N.J.
------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Capital Accounts, LLC. The case
is captioned ERICA NEDRICK, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ACCOUNTS, LLC
and JOHN DOES 1-25, the Defendant, Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-PGS-LHG
(D.N.J., July 18, 2016). The assigned Judge is Peter G. Sheridan.

Capital Accounts specializes in collection of overdue balances.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ari Hillel Marcus, Esq.
          MARCUS ZELMAN LLC
          1500 Allaire Avenue, Suite 101
          OCEAN, NJ 07712
          Telephone: (732) 695 3282
          Facsimile: (732) 298 6256
          E-mail: ari@marcuszelman.com


CHARLES SCHWAB: "Crago" Suit Alleges Securities Act Violation
-------------------------------------------------------------
ROBERT CRAGO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated, v. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., THE CHARLES SCHWAB
CORPORATION, CHARLES SCHWAB, and WALTER W. BETTINGER II, Case
3:16-cv-03938 (N.D. Cal., July 13, 2016), was filed on behalf of
all clients of Schwab between July 13, 2011 and July 13, 2016 who
placed trade orders that were automatically routed to UBS
Securities LLC in violation of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act.

Defendant Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., a subsidiary of The Charles
Schwab Corporation that was incorporated in 1971, is a securities
broker-dealer.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Adam C. McCall, Esq.
     LEVI & KORSINSKY LLP
     445 South Figueroa Street, 31st Floor
     Los Angeles, CA 90071
     Phone: (213) 985-7290
     Fax: (202) 333-2121
     E-mail: amccall@zlk.com

        - and -

     Nicholas I. Porritt, Esq.
     1101 30th Street NW, Suite 115
     Washington, D.C. 20001
     Phone: (202) 524-4290
     Fax: (202) 333-2121
     E-mail: nporritt@zlk.com


CHRISTOPHER PALACE: "Ayala" Suit Seeks Minimum, Overtime Pay
------------------------------------------------------------
Lorenza Ayala, individually and on behalf of those similarly
situated, Plaintiffs, v. Christopher's Palace Inc., Olga
Rodriguez, Segundo Abad, and Mario Rodriguez and/or any related
entities, Defendants, Case No. 511615/2016 (N.Y. Sup., July 8,
2016), seeks to recover unpaid minimum wages and overtime wages,
illegal deductions and unpaid tips plus penalties, interest,
damages, attorneys' fees, and costs pursuant to the New York Labor
Law and New York Codes, Rules and Regulations.

Christopher's Palace Inc., is a domestic business corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York and
York State, and owned, operated and managed by Segundo Abad, with
its principal place of business at 1258 Myrtle Ave., Brooklyn, New
York 11221, where Plaintiff worked as a waitress.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Michael A Tompkins, Esq.
     LEEDS BROWN LAW, P.C.
     One Old Country Road, Suite 347
     Carle Place NY 11514
     Tel: (516) 873-9550


CONNECTICUT: State Board of Education Faces Class Action
--------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Connecticut State Board of
Education. The case is captioned D.J., through his parent O.W., on
behalf of a class of those similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v.
Connecticut State Board of Education, the Defendant, Case No.
3:16-cv-01197-CSH (D. Conn., July 15, 2016). The assigned Judge is
Hon. Charles S. Haight, Jr.

The Connecticut State Board of Education is the governing body of
the Connecticut State Department of Education, the state education
agency of Connecticut. The board and the department oversee public
education in the state, distribute funds to the state's 166 school
districts, and operates the Connecticut Technical High School
System.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Nancy B. Alisberg, Esq.
          STATE OF CONNECTICUT
          OFFICE OF PROT. & ADV.
          FOR HANDICAPPED
          60B Weston St.
          Hartford, CT 06120
          Telephone: (800) 842 7303
          Facsimile: (860) 566 8714
          E-mail: nancy.alisberg@ct.gov


COOK COUNTY, IL: Judge Discarded Stroked Inmate's Suit
------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Manish S. Shah of the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern Division granted defendants' motion for summary
judgment in the case ROBERT ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF OF
COOK COUNTY, et al., Defendants, No. 10 CV 2353 (N.D. Ill.)

Robert Anderson an inmate detained at Cook County Jail suffered a
stroke in February 2010. Anderson sued correctional officer Frank
Fite, under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 for deliberate indifference to
his medical needs. Anderson also brought claims against Cook
County and the Sheriff of Cook County, in his official capacity,
based on an alleged failure to create adequate blood-pressure-
monitoring procedures for detainees and an alleged policy of
failing to provide detainees with needed medications.

The medications claim was dismissed at Anderson's request and
without objection, as the claim will be resolved in a related
class-action suit where Anderson is a member of the class).
Defendants move for summary judgment on the remaining claims
against them.

Judge Shah granted defendants' motion for summary judgment.

A copy of Judge Shah's memorandum opinion and order dated July 6,
2016, is available at http://goo.gl/BI39CPfrom Leagle.com.

Robert Anderson, Plaintiff, represented by:

Kenneth N Flaxman, Esq.
Joel A. Flaxman, Esq.
Kenneth N. Flaxman, P.C.
200 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 201
Chicago, IL 06604
Telephone: 312-427-3200

     - and -

Thomas Gerard Morrissey, Esq.
Law Office of Thomas G. Morrissey
10249 Western Ave.
Chicago, IL 60643
Telephone: 773-233-7900

Defendants, represented by Anthony E. Zecchin, Cook County State's
Attorney's Office


COOK COUNTY, IL: 7th Cir. Affirms Decertification in "Phillips"
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Kenneth F. Ripple of the United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit, affirmed the district court's decision in the
case MELVIN PHILLIPS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHERIFF OF
COOK COUNTY, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Nos. 14-3753, 15-1616
(7th Cir.).

Plaintiffs Melvin Phillips, Malcolm Patton, Rodell Sanders, and
Frank Powicki are current and former detainees of Cook County
Jail. The Jail has a population of approximately 9,500 detainees.
The average length of stay at the Jail is 57 days, and the median
length of stay is 12 days. Cermak Health Services, a division of
the Cook County Bureau of Health, provides dental care to the
detainees at the Jail.

Plaintiffs brought a class action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983
against Cook County, Illinois, and the Sheriff of Cook County,
claiming that the level of dental care they received at the Jail
demonstrated deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth
and Fourteenth Amendments.

The district court originally certified two classes of plaintiffs
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. However, the district
court subsequently decertified one class, modified the other
class, and determined that the detainees' motion for injunctive
relief was moot. The detainees timely appealed the district
court's decision to decertify. While the appeal was pending, the
detainees moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 60(b) based on newly discovered evidence, but the
district court denied the motion. The detainees timely appealed
the denial. The two appeals have been consolidated.

Judge Ripple affirmed the district court's decision in
decertifying the class and dismissed the appeal from the court's
disposition of the Rule 60(b) motion.

A copy of Judge Ripple's judgment dated July 6, 2016, is available
at http://goo.gl/KGhC7Xfrom Leagle.com.

For Plaintiffs-Appellants:

Kenneth N. Flaxman, Esq.
Law Offices of Kenneth N. Flaxman P.C.
200 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 201
Chicago, IL 06604
Telephone: 312-427-3200

Michael Lambert Gallagher -- mlg@gknet.com -- at Gallagher &
Kennedy, for Defendant-Appellee Sheriff of Cook County

Michael Lambert Gallagher -- mlg@gknet.com -- at Gallagher &
Kennedy; Thomas Cargie -- Maureen O'Donoghue Hannon, for
Defendant-Appellee Illinois Cook County

The United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit panel consists
of Circuit Judge Kenneth F. Ripple, Michael S. Kanne and Ann
Claire Williams.


CORAL REEF: Judge Grants Final Approval of Class Settlement
-----------------------------------------------------------
District Judge James V. Selna of the Central District of
California granted plaintiff's motion for final approval of a
class action settlement and entry of final judgment in the case
BRIANA A. KEEN, on behalf of herself and all persons similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. CORAL REEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., ANTHONY
TOMA, and Does 1 through 100 inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 8:14-
cv-00814-JVS-JCG (C.D. Cal.).

The court granted final approval of the settlement pursuant to
Rule 23 (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and directed
the parties to consummate the agreement in accordance with its
terms.

CPT Group, Inc., the settlement administrator, is directed to mail
each claimant's share of the gross settlement fund within 45 days.
The settlement administrator is directed to pay each class member
who made a valid claim his or her share of the Gross Settlement
Fund within 45 days.

The court directs defendants to email the reactivation notice to
each main class member forthwith except that with respect to those
main class members without a functioning or valid email address,
the reactivation notice shall be sent by United States mail to the
last known address of the class member. The reactivation notice
shall also be emailed 10 days after the first sending, 20 days
after the first sending and 30 days after the first sending, for a
total of four times. Once a class member has claimed his free
membership it is unnecessary to continue to send him or her
additional reactivation notices.

Defendants shall pay provide the free membership services as
specified in the settlement to members of the main class for a
period of three months commencing upon reactivation. This
membership shall be in Nine9, the rebranded name of One Source
Talent and shall be equivalent to the pay membership available to
the public.

The court directs the settlement administrator to mail to each
member of the refund class a check for $500 along with a cover
letter explaining the purpose of the payment. The payments shall
be mailed within 45 days. The settlement administrator is directed
to pay each member of the refund class from the gross settlement
fund within 45 days.

Plaintiff Briana Keen is entitled to receive an incentive award in
the amount of $6,000. The settlement administrator is directed to
pay Briana Keen $6,000 from the gross settlement fund within 45
days. The settlement administrator is ordered to mail a check
payable to plaintiff to her counsel's law office within 45 days.
The court awards class counsel $300,000 in attorney's fees to be
allocated pursuant to their existing arrangements.  In addition,
the court finds that class counsel have expended $8,705 in
reasonable litigation expenses and they shall be reimbursed in
that amount. The settlement administrator may reimburse itself
actual fees and costs not to exceed $21,500 from the gross
settlement fund. The settlement administrator is directed to pay
class counsel the specified attorney's fees and costs
reimbursement from the gross settlement fund within 45 days.

A copy of Judge Selna's order dated June 9, 2016, is available at
http://goo.gl/N7hLBCfrom Leagle.com.

Briana A. Keen, Plaintiff, represented by Jeffrey P Spencer --
jps@spencerlaw.net -- at Spencer Law Firm; Jeffrey N Wilens --
jeff@lakeshorelaw.org -- at Lakeshore Law Center

Coral Reef Productions, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew R
Kislik -- akislik@nassiri-jung.com -- Kenneth M Walczak -- Charles
H Jung at Nassiri and Jung LLP

Anthony Toma, Defendant, represented by Charles H Jung -- Kenneth
M Walczak at Nassiri and Jung LLP


CORDIS CORP: Court Wants Briefing on Jurisdiction
-------------------------------------------------
In the case, DAVID RESOVSKY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CORDIS
CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, Case No. 16-cv-03082-EMC (N.D.
Calif.), District Judge Edward M. Chen ordered the parties to file
brief explaining why the Court has jurisdiction over the case.

The briefs were due July 21, 2016.

According to Judge Chen, it is unclear that the Court has
jurisdiction, as based on the record it does not appear that the
cases were consolidated contrary to what Cordis believed.

A copy of the Court's Order dated July 18, 2016, is available at
http://goo.gl/ORz1snfrom Leagle.com.

Cordis Corporation, Defendant, represented by Kevin Cooper Mayer
-- kmayer@crowell.com -- Crowell Moring LLP.

Confluent Medical Technologies, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Michelle A. Childers -- machilders@dbr.com -- Drinker Biddle &
Reath LLP.

Nitinol Devices and Components, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Michelle A. Childers -- machilders@dbr.com -- Drinker Biddle &
Reath LLP & Matthew Jacob Adler -- matthew.adler@dbr.com --
Drinker Biddle Reath LLP.


CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: Wins Dismissal of "Hitchcock" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw of the Middle District of
Tennessee, Nashville Division granted defendants' motion to
dismiss in the case ELOISE HITCHCOCK, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY 403(B) DC PLAIN, et al., Defendants, No.
3:15-cv-01215 (M.D. Tenn.).

In 1966, Cumberland University created the Cumberland University
403(B) DC Plan to provide pension benefits to eligible employees.
The plan is a tax-sheltered annuity plan, providing benefits for
certain employees through annuity contracts or custodial accounts.

In 2008, Cumberland provided its employees with a summary plan
description, informing participants that effective January 1,
2009, Cumberland will provide an annual employer matching
contribution of five percent of the participant's salary to each
participant's account. However, in 2013 and 2014, Cumberland,
without notice to the plan participants did not make its matching
contributions to the participant accounts.

On October 9, 2014, Cumberland amended the plan to replace the 5%
annual match with a discretionary match, in which Cumberland would
determine the amount of the employer matching contribution on a
yearly basis and also making it retroactive, effective on January
1, 2013.  After the amendment, Cumberland announced that it would
not be providing employer matching for the 2013-14 fiscal year.

On November 12, 2015, plaintiffs, former employees of Cumberland
University and beneficiaries under the 403(B) Plan filed a class
action complaint and alleges wrongful denial of benefits on behalf
of the putative benefits class, anti-cutback violation on behalf
of the benefits class, failure to provide notice on behalf of the
notice class and breach of fiduciary duty on behalf of benefits
and notice classes.

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss alleging that plaintiffs did
not allege that they administratively exhausted their claims for
benefits or that exhausting their claims would be futile, that
plaintiffs' claim that defendants did not provide notice about the
amendments to the plan are unsupported by legal authority and
defendants did not breach any fiduciary duties.

Judge Crenshaw granted defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissed
the case without prejudice.

A copy of Judge Crenshaw's memorandum opinion dated June 9, 2016,
is available at http://goo.gl/2jDxWOfrom Leagle.com.

Plaintiffs, represented by Joey P. Leniski, Jr. --
joeyl@BSJFirm.com -- Karla M. Campbell -- karlac@BSJFirm.com --
Seamus T. Kelly -- seamusk@BSJFirm.com -- at Branstetter, Stranch
& Jennings, PLLC

Defendants, represented by Bradley W. Craig --
bcraig@lewisthomason.com -- Charles W. Cagle --
ccagle@lewisthomason.com -- Laura H. Alrutz --
lalrutz@lewisthomason.com -- at Lewis, Thomason, King, Krieg &
Waldrop, P.C.


DEVELOPMENTAL PATHWAYS: Faces "Bagoue" Lawsuit Under FLSA
---------------------------------------------------------
Flavie Bondeh Bagoue, and those similarly situated v.
Developmental Pathways, Inc., Continuum Of Colorado, Inc., Case
1:16-cv-01804 (D. Col., July 14, 2016), was filed under the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Defendant Developmental Pathways, Inc., and Continuum of Colorado,
Inc. are Colorado Non-Profit Corporations.

Ms. Bagoue purportedly worked as a Life Skills Specialist in
Nevada Group Home, a residential habilitation center for
developmentally disabled adults operated by Defendants. She
previously worked in other homes also operated by Defendants.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Alexander Hood, Esq.
     1535 High St., Suite 300
     Denver, CO 80218
     Phone: (720) 239-2606
     Fax: (303) 957-2289
     E-mail: alex@towardsjustice.org

        - and -

     Brian D. Gonzales, Esq.
     THE LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN D. GONZALES
     242 Linden Street
     Fort Collins, CO 80524
     Phone: (970) 214-0562
     Fax: (303) 539-9812


DOMETIC CORP: Reply to "Papasan" Suit Due Aug. 19
-------------------------------------------------
In the case, CATHERINE PAPASAN, et al., and all persons similarly
situated, Plaintiffs, v. DOMETIC CORPORATION, Defendant, Case No.
3:16-cv-02117-HSG (N.D. Calif.), District Judge Haywood S.
Gilliam, Jr. granted the parties' stipulation which requires
Defendant to file a response to the First Amended Class Action
Complaint by August 19, 2016.  The parties are entitled to file a
memorandum of no more than 30 pages.

The Court, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, also ordered
that: (1) If Defendant's response to the First Amended Class
Action Complaint is a motion to dismiss, and if Plaintiffs do not
seek leave to file a second amended complaint pursuant to Rule 15
in response to such motion to dismiss, Plaintiffs shall file their
opposition to the motion to dismiss by September 20, 2016; (2) If
Plaintiffs file an opposition to the motion to dismiss and do not
seek leave to file a second amended complaint, Defendant shall
file any reply brief by October 11, 2016; (3) This extension does
not affect any of the dates scheduled by the Court pursuant to the
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order, entered on April 29,
2016.

A copy of the Court's Order dated July 18, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/QmGW2Dfrom Leagle.com.

Dometic Corporation, Defendant, represented by Peter Allen Wald
-- peter.wald@lw.com -- Latham & Watkins LLP, Marcy Christina
Priedeman -- marcy.priedeman@lw.com -- Latham Watkins LLP & Robert
Christian Collins, III -- robert.collins@lw.com --Latham and
Watkins LLP, pro hac vice.


DT MAINTENANCE: Faces Sky Management Suit in S.D.N.Y.
-----------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against DT Maintenance LLC. The case is
styled Sky Management Corporation, a New York corporation,
individually and as the representative of a class of similarly
situated persons, the Plaintiff, v. DT Maintenance LLC,
Octavio Diaz, and John Does 1-10, the Defendants, Case No. 1:16-
cv-05692 (S.D.N.Y., July 18, 2016).

DT Maintenance is engaged in the building maintenance services
industry.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dan Shaked, Esq.
          SHAKED LAW GROUP P.C.
          44 Court Street, Suite 1217
          Brooklyn, NY 11201
          Telephone: (917) 373 9128
          Facsimile: (718) 504 7555
          E-mail: shakedlawgroup@gmail.com


EDGEWELL PERSONAL: Faces "Fernandez" Suit Over False Ad
-------------------------------------------------------
TRACY FERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, v. EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE COMPANY, SUN
PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, and PLAYTEX PRODUCTS, LLC, Case: 4:16-cv-
01140 (E.D. Mo., July 14, 2016), claims damages as a direct and
proximate result of Defendants' alleged misrepresentations and
omissions regarding its BBK product that was claimed to have a sun
protection factor of level 50.

Defendants are in the business of manufacturing, marketing and
distributing sunscreen products, including BBK.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Emily J. Kirk, Esq.
     MCCUNEWRIGHT LLP
     2068 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 216
     Redlands, CA 92374
     Phone: (909) 557-1250
     Fax: (909) 557-1275
     E-mail: ejk@mccunewright.com

        - and -

     Joseph G. Sauder, Esq.
     Matthew D. Schelkopf, Esq.
     Joseph B. Kenney, Esq.
     MCCUNEWRIGHT, LLP
     1055 Westlakes Drive, Suite 300
     Berwyn, PA 19312
     Phone: (610) 200-0580
     E-mail: jgs@mccunewright.com
             mds@mccunewright.com
             jbk@mccunewright.com


EMBASSY HEALTHCARE: India Channels Sues Under FLSA, Ohio Wage Act
-----------------------------------------------------------------
INDIA CHANNELS 1461 E 250th Street Euclid, OH 44117 on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated, v. EMBASSY HEALTHCARE,
INC. c/o Statutory Agent Eric M. Simon 200 Public Square, Suite
3500 Cleveland, OH 44114 and EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC.
d/b/a Embassy Healthcare c/o Statutory Agent Eric M. Simon 200
Public Square, Suite 3500 Cleveland, OH 44114, Case: 1:16-cv-01806
(N.D. Ohio, July 15, 2016), alleges violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act.

Defendants are in the business of providing skilled nursing care
in nursing homes and assisted living facilities.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Anthony J. Lazzaro, Esq.
     Chastity L. Christy, Esq.
     Lori M. Griffin, Esq.
     THE LAZZARO LAW FIRM, LLC
     920 Rockefeller Building
     614 W. Superior Avenue
     Cleveland, OH 44113
     Phone: 216-696-5000
     Fax: (216) 696-7005
     E-mail: anthony@lazzarolawfirm.com
             chastity@lazzarolawfirm.com
             lori@lazzarolawfirm.com


EVERGREEN RECREATIONAL: Faces "Grimes" Suit Pursuant to WARN Act
----------------------------------------------------------------
MATTHEW GRIMES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, v. EVERGREEN RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, LLC, KR ENTERPRISES,
INC., and JMA, LLC, USDC IN/ND case 3:16-cv-00472 (N.D. Ind., July
15, 2016), seeks to recover 60 days wages and benefits, pursuant
to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.

EVERGREEN RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, LLC manufactures recreational
vehicles.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Irwin B. Levin, Esq.
     Richard E. Shevitz, Esq.
     Vess A. Miller, Esq.
     COHEN & MALAD, LLP
     One Indiana Square, Suite 1400
     Indianapolis, IN 46204
     Phone: (317) 636-6481
     Fax: (317) 636-2593
     E-mail: ilevin@cohenandmalad.com
             rshevitz@cohenandmalad.com
             vmiller@cohenandmalad.com

        - and -

     Jack A. Raisner, Esq.
     Ren‚ S. Roupinian, Esq.
     OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
     3 Park Avenue, 29th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Phone: (212) 245-1000
     E-mail: jar@outtengolden.com
             rsr@outtengolden.com


EXPEDITORS & PRODUCTION: Agreed Motion to Certify Class Filed
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, Cox v. Expeditors & Production Services Co., Case No.
6:16-cv-00454 (W.D. La.), Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna held
that, in light of the Agreed Motion for Conditional Certification
filed by the parties on July 25, 2016, the Motion to Certify Class
is dismissed as moot. The hearing on the Motion set for July 26,
2016 was canceled.


FCA US LLC: "Vosburgh" Sues over Defective Shifters
---------------------------------------------------
Bruce Vosburgh, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company, Defendant, Case No. 2:16-cv-12571 (E.D. Mich., July 8,
2016), seeks injunctive relief in the form of a recall or fee
replacement program; replacement cars of comparable value to all
owners until the vehicles' defective shifters are repaired; that
the Defendant buy back the affected vehicles back at original
purchase or lease cost with no deduction for use; equitable
relief, costs, restitution, damages, including punitive damages,
penalties and disgorgement; pre and post judgment interest on any
amounts awarded; attorneys' fees and such other or further relief
resulting from unjust enrichment, breach of express/implied
warranty and violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and the
Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law.

Defendant's 2012-2014 Dodge Chargers, 2012-2014 Chrysler 300
vehicles, 2014-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles and 2014 Maserati
Quattroporte and Ghibli vehicles have gear selectors that always
move back to a central location after being engaged.

FCA is a motor vehicle manufacturer and licensed distributor of
new, previously untitled Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram brand
motor vehicles. Vosburgh owns a 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Plaintiff is represented by:

      E. Powell Miller, Esq.
      Sharon S. Almonrode, Esq.
      THE MILLER LAW FIRM, P.C.
      950 W. University Dr., Suite 300
      Rochester, MI 48307
      Tel: (248) 841-2200
      Fax: (248) 652-2852
      Email: epm@millerlawpc.com
             ssa@millerlawpc.com

             - and -

      Daniel E. Gustafson, Esq.
      Jason S. Kilene, Esq.
      David A. Goodwin, Esq.
      Raina C. Borrelli, Esq.
      GUSTAFSON GLUEK PLLC
      Canadian Pacific Plaza
      120 S. Sixth St., Suite 2600
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Tel: (612) 333-8844
      Fax: (612) 339-6622
      Email: dgustafson@gustafsongluek.com
             jkilene@gustafsongluek.com
             dgoodwin@gustafsongluek.com
             rborrelli@gustafsongluek.com

             - and -

      Simon Bahne Paris, Esq.
      Patrick Howard
      SALTZ, MONGELUZZI, BARRETT & BENDESKY, P.C.
      One Liberty Place, 52nd Floor
      1650 Market Street
      Philadelphia, PA 19103
      Tel: (215) 575-3986
      Email: sparis@smbb.com
             phoward@smbb.com

             - and -

      Alyson Oliver, Esq.
      THE OLIVER LAW GROUP P.C.
      363 W. Big Beaver Rd., Suite 200
      Troy, MI 48084
      Tel: (248) 327-6556
      Email: aoliver@oliverlg.com


FEDERAL INSURANCE: Bancorpsouth Sues Over Denial of Coverage
------------------------------------------------------------
BANCORPSOUTH, INC., v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Case 1:16-cv-
01871-SEB-DML (S.D. Ind., July 13, 2016), alleges improper refusal
of Defendant to pay for litigation defense costs under a financial
institution's insurance policy purchased by Plaintiff.

Federal Insurance Company provides property and casualty insurance
products and services for businesses and individuals.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Christina L. Fugate, Esq.
     ICE MILLER LLP
     One American Square, Suite 2900
     Indianapolis, IN 46282-0200
     Phone: (317) 236-2100

        - and -

     Lawrence J. Bracken II, Esq.
     HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
     Bank of America Plaza, Suite 4100
     600 Peachtree St., N.E.
     Atlanta, GA 30308-2216
     Phone: (404) 888-4182
     Fax: (404) 602-9074
     E-mail: lbracken@hunton.com

        - and -

     Michael S. Levine, Esq.
     Jennifer E. White, Esq.
     HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
     1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 1700
     McLean, Virginia 22102
     Phone: (703) 714-7400
     Fax: (703) 714-7410
     E-mail: mlevine@hunton.com
             jewhite@hunton.com


FREDERICK J. HANNA: "Schell" Settlement Granted Preliminary OK
--------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Thomas M. Rose of the Southern District of Ohio,
Western Division, Dayton, granted plaintiff's motions in the case
VICKI L. SCHELL, on behalf of herself and others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK J. HANNA & ASSOCIATES, P.C.,
Defendant, Case No. 3:15-cv-00418 (S.D. Ohio)

On June 8, 2016, Vicki L. Schell filed an unopposed motion for
final approval of class action settlement and unopposed motion for
approval of an incentive award and an award of attorneys' fees and
reimbursement of expenses.

Judge Rose approves the proposed settlement and approves the
requested incentive award and award of attorneys' fees and
expenses.

The court certifies the following class, for settlement purposes,
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23:

          "All persons with an Ohio address, to whom Frederick J.
Hanna & Associates, P.C. mailed an initial debt collection
communication that stated: unless you notify this office in
writing within 30 days after receiving this notice that you
dispute the validity of the debt or any portion thereof, this
office will assume this debt is valid, and/or if you request
within 30 days after receiving this notice, this office will
provide you with the name and address of the original creditor, if
different from the current creditor, between November 20, 2014 and
November 20, 2015, in connection with the collection of a consumer
debt."

The Court appoints Vicki L. Schell as class representative and
Jesse S. Johnson of Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as the attorney
and law firm as class counsel.

Defendant will create a common fund in the amount of $1,770.00,
which will be distributed on a pro-rata basis to each of the 177
class members who did not exclude themselves from the settlement,
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 1692k(a)(2)(B)(ii). Defendant will
pay to plaintiff $1,000 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section
1692k(a)(2)(B)(i), and an additional $500 for her service to the
class, for a total sum of $1,500.  Defendant will pay the costs of
notice and administration of the settlement separate and apart
from any monies paid to plaintiff, class members, or class
counsel.

The court awards a total of $21,250.00 for class counsel's costs,
expenses, and attorneys' fees, which amount the court finds
reasonable under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act after
consideration of the memorandum and supporting declaration
submitted by plaintiff's counsel.

A copy of Judge Rose's entry and order dated July 8, 2016, is
available at http://goo.gl/1GeW9bfrom Leagle.com.

Vicki L. Schell, Plaintiff, represented by David McColl Tannehill;
Jesse S. Johnson -- jjohnson@gdrlawfirm.com -- at Greenwald
Davidson Radbil PLLC

Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C., Defendant, represented by
Carrie Masters Starts -- cstarts@reminger.com -- Reminger Co.,
L.P.A.; Philip W. Savrin -- psavrin@fmglaw.com -- William H.
Buechner, Jr. -- bbuechner@fmglaw.com -- at Freeman Mathis & Gary,
LLP


GEO GROUP: Faces Suit Alleging Non-payment of Wages, Force Labor
----------------------------------------------------------------
EDWIN AGUILAR IBARRA, ODELIN MONTAS, RENE CARDENAS, ALFREDO JESUS
CHACON, ROGERIO CHAVES SCOTTON, GLEND STEWART, ERNESTO ROMERO
VIDAL, v. GEO GROUP INC., GEORGE ZOLEY, D. RAY JAMES CORRECTION
FACILITY, WARDEN, TRACY JOHNS, Case 5:16-cv-00055-LGW-RSB (S.D.
Ga., July 12, 2016), alleges non-payment of wages, force slave
labor and seeks writ of habeas corpus for violation of
Constitutional and International Fundamental Rights.

The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) is a Florida-based company specializing
in corrections, detention and mental health treatment.


GOLDEN 88: Faces "Chong" Suit Over FLSA, N.Y. Labor Law Breach
--------------------------------------------------------------
SHEK MOOI CHONG a/k/a "Cindy", individually and on behalf all
other employees similarly situated, v. GOLDEN 88 SPOON INC. d/b/a
SPOON ASIAN FUSION, TJ PRIME INC. d/b/a SPOON ASIAN FUSION, YIN
ZHENG, XUEQIN ZHENG, TERRY ZHENG, BI CHEN, XINGJU ZHENG, John Doe
and Jane Doe # 1-10, Case 1:16-cv-05591 (S.D.N.Y., July 13, 2016),
alleges violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the New
York Labor Law, arising from Defendants' various willful and
unlawful employment policies, patterns and/or practices.

Golden 88 Spoon Inc. owns and operates a restaurant doing business
as Spoon Asian Fusion.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Jian Hang, Esq.
     HANG & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
     136-18 39th Ave., Suite 1003
     Flushing, NY 11354
     Phone: (718) 353-8588
     E-mail: jhang@hanglaw.com


GOLDEN STATE FC: "Parson" Lawsuit Dismissed
-------------------------------------------
The case, DAVID PARSON and BRANDON MITCHELL, individually and on
behalf of all those similarly situated, and MARIAH GULLAT as an
individual, Plaintiffs, v. GOLDEN STATE FC LLC, et al.,
Defendants, Case No. 3:16-cv-00405-JST (N.D. Cal.), is dismissed
pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal approved by
District Judge Jon S. Tigar.

Case dismissal is with prejudice without costs and attorneys' fees
to any party.

The stipulation, however, does not preclude plaintiffs from
recovering from or participating in other class action cases that
are certified as absent class members, but not as named plaintiffs
or class representatives.

A copy of the court's order dated June 29, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/o7Bk1gfrom Leagle.com.

Golden State FC, LLC, et al., Defendants, represented by Eric
Meckley -- emeckley@morganlewis.com -- Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP,
Sacha Marie Steenhoek -- ssteenhoek@morganlewis.com -- Morgan
Lewis & Bockius LLP, Joseph A. Nuccio --
joseph.nuccio@morganlewis.com -- Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, pro
hac vice, Richard G. Rosenblatt --
richard.rosenblatt@morganlewis.com -- Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP,
pro hac vice & Theresa C. Mak -- theresa.mak@morganlewis.com --
Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP.

Trueblue Inc, et al., Defendants, represented by David Raymond
Ongaro -- david.ongaro@tklaw.com -- Ongaro PC, Amelia D.
Winchester -- awinchester@ongaropc.com -- Ongaro PC & Cara Robin
Sherman -- csherman@ongaropc.com -- Ongaro PC.


GRAND DADDYS: May Execute Terms of "Mays" Suit Settlement
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case, Elizabeth M. Mays, on her own behalf and On behalf of
others similarly situated v. Grand Daddy's LLC, et al, Case No.
14-cv-461-slc (W.D. Wis.), Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker
directed the parties to execute the terms of the Settlement
Agreement, approved on June 15, 2016, including payment to each
settling class member of the amount due pursuant to the allocation
formulas set forth in Section C (6) and (13) of the Settlement
Agreement and the final distribution list, as appended to the
parties' brief.

The Court held that the parties' settlement agreement is fully and
finally approved. Thus, the case is dismissed with prejudice, and
the class representative and all class members -- except the one
class member who excluded herself -- are barred from pursuing any
claims that were released against the defendants as set forth in
Section F of the Settlement Agreement.

A copy of the Court's Order dated July 11, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/mOfRvzfrom Leagle.com.

Grand Daddy's, LLC, Defendant, represented by Jeff Scott Olson,
Jeff Scott Olson Law Firm.


GREAT AMERICAN PLUMBING: Judge Won't Let Plaintiffs Amend Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Edward J. Davila of the Northern District of
California, San Jose Division, denied plaintiffs' motion for leave
to file third amended complaint in the case JASON GOMEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs, v. THE GREAT AMERICAN PLUMBING COMPANY, INC., et al.,
Defendants, Case No. 5:15-cv-02465-EJD (N.D. Cal.)

Jason Gomez and Ezekiel Contreras were employed by The Great
American Plumbing Company, Inc. (GAPC) as construction and repair
plumbers. They allege that GAPC failed to pay them accurate wages.
On September 28, 2015, the court issued a case management order
that provided a deadline by which the parties could amend their
pleadings. That deadline expired on or about November 27, 2015,
and the parties thereafter stipulated that plaintiffs Gomez and
Contreras could file a second amended complaint in order to remove
class action allegations.

Plaintiffs moved for leave to file a third amended complaint in
order to add a new defendant, Beryl Evelyn Blackstone, because she
is part-owner of GAPC and, according to them, had the power to
discipline plaintiffs and control their compensation.

GAPC and another defendant, Mark Anthony McGinnis, opposed the
motion.

Judge Davila denied plaintiffs' motion for leave to file third
amended complaint and the hearing scheduled for June 16 has been
vacated.

A copy of Judge Davila's order dated June 9, 2016, is available at
http://goo.gl/hRgwIEfrom Leagle.com.

Plaintiffs, represented by Huy Ngoc Tran -- Huy@JAWLawGroup.com
-- Tomas Eduardo Margain at Justice at Work Law Group

The Great American Plumbing Company, Inc. and Mark Anthony
McGinnis, Defendants, represented by Stephen Douglas Collins --
scollins@tingleylawgroup.com -- at Tingley Law Group, PC

Suretec Indemnity Company, Defendant, represented by Stephen
Douglas Collins -- scollins@tingleylawgroup.com -- at Tingley Law
Group, PC; Geoffrey Ralph Hudson -- grh@grhattorney.net -- at Law
Offices of Hausman & Sosa, LLP


HEARST COMMUNICATIONS: Nov. 10 Final Approval Hearing Set
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case, NEIL KRAN, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a
Delaware corporation, A MARKETING RESOURCE, LLC, a Minnesota
limited liability company, Defendants, Case No. 0:15-cv-02058-MJD-
BRT (D. Minn.), District Judge Michael J. Davis granted the
preliminary approval of the Class Action Settlement Agreement
after it satisfied, for settlement purposes only, all requirements
of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.

The Court will hold a Final Approval Hearing on the fairness,
adequacy, and reasonableness of the Settlement Agreement on
November 10, 2016, at 9:30 AM CST or at such other date and time
later set by Court Order.

No later than August 19, 2016, plaintiff is ordered to file papers
in support of Class Counsel's application for attorneys' fees and
expenses, and no later than September 29, 2016, plaintiff is
likewise ordered to file papers in support of final approval of
the Settlement and in response to any objections.

A copy of the court's order dated June 29, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/DycTYjfrom Leagle.com.

Hearst Newspapers, LLC, Defendant, represented by Erin L. Hoffman
-- erin.hoffman@FaegreBD.com -- Faegre Baker Daniels LLP & Mary
Andreleita Walker -- lwalker@faegre.com -- Faegre Baker Daniels
LLP.

A Marketing Resource, LLC, Defendant, represented by Anne
Greenwood Brown -- anne@stlawfirm.com -- Sjoberg & Tebelius, PA,
Arthur G. Boylan -- arthur.boylan@leonard.com -- Anthony Ostlund
Baer & Louwagie PA & Cory D. Olson -- colson@aoblaw.com -- Anthony
Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA.


HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN: Bid for Attorneys' Fees Granted in Part
------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Donovan W. Frank of the District of Minnesota
granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs' motion for award of
attorneys' fees and expenses in the case Kevin W. Rouse, Emily M.
Rouse, and Brian L. Ranwick, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Hennepin County,
Defendant. United States of America, Intervenor, Hennepin County,
Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Quadrant Systems, LLC, Third-Party
Defendant, Civil No. 12-326 (DWF/SER) (D. Minn.)

Plaintiffs Kevin and Emily Rouse and Brian L. Ranwick alleged that
on separate occasions between the dates of March 16, 2011 and
February 1, 2012, Kevin used his MasterCard credit card to
purchase a notary registration, pay sales tax for an automobile,
purchase a driver's license, purchase lien notices for three cars,
and purchase license tabs from Hennepin County, and that Hennepin
County provided receipts with an un-redacted credit card
expiration date for these transactions. In addition, they claimed
that on December 16, 2011, Emily purchased a passport from
Hennepin County, used her Visa credit card to pay, and Hennepin
County provided a receipt with an un-redacted expiration date.
Finally, Plaintiffs asserted that on February 9, 2012, Ranwick
purchased photos from Hennepin County, used his Master Card credit
card to pay, and Hennepin County provided a receipt with an un-
redacted expiration date. Plaintiffs initiated a class action,
asserting that Hennepin County provided numerous customers with
similar receipts that failed to redact the expiration dates and
thereby violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Fair and
Accurate Credit Transaction Act.

On October 25, 2013, the parties reached a settlement. On March
12, 2014, the court granted the parties' motion for final approval
of class action settlement and entered final judgment. During the
redemption period, 189 out of approximately 283,000 class members
requested vouchers and 45 class members redeemed vouchers, for a
total of $757. Plaintiff seeks attorney fees in the amount of
$192,616.96 and costs in the amount of $2,985.32, for a total
award of $195,602.28.

The motion is granted in part to the extent plaintiffs seek
attorney fees. The amount of fees requested by plaintiffs is
denied as excessive. Plaintiffs shall recover attorney fees in the
amount of $38,523.39 and shall recover costs in the amount of
$3,466.87.

A copy of Judge Frank's memorandum opinion and order dated June 9,
2016, is available at http://goo.gl/oiYMlrfrom Leagle.com.

Plaintiffs, represented by Thomas J Lyons --
tlyons@lyonslawfirm.com -- at Lyons Law Firm, P.A.; Thomas J
Lyons, Jr. at Consumer Justice Center P.A.

Hennepin County, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, represented by
Michael O Freeman, and Rebecca Lee Stark Holschuh at Hennepin
County Attorney's Office

United States of America, Intervenor, represented by Gerald C Kell
at US Department of Justice


HOGAN TRANSPORTATION: Faces "Fairfax" Suit Under FLSA, Wage Act
---------------------------------------------------------------
DON FAIRFAX, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, 6212 Bay Brook Dr. Judge Canal Winchester, Ohio 43110 v.
HOGAN TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT, INC., By Serving Its Registered
Agent CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service 50 West Broad Street, Ste.
1800 Columbus, OH 43215, Case: 2:16-cv-00680-GCS-KAJ (S.D. Ohio,
July 14, 2016), seeks monetary, declaratory, and injunctive relief
due to Defendants' alleged willful failure to compensate employees
with proper pay in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards
Act, and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage
Standards Act.

Defendant provides transportation and logistics services to a wide
range of public groups and private entities and/or individuals
across the country.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Lance Chapin, Esq.
     Steven C. Babin Jr., Esq.
     CHAPIN LEGAL GROUP, LLC
     580 South High Street, Suite 330
     Columbus, OH 43215
     Phone: (614) 221-9100
     Fax: (614) 221-9272
     E-mail: lchapin@chapinlegal.com
             sbabin@chapinlegal.com


IDEAL CONCEPTS: Faces "Bruno" Suit Under FLSA, Penn. Wage Act
-------------------------------------------------------------
MARK BRUNO, on behalf of himself and similarly situated
individuals, v. IDEAL CONCEPTS INC. and AMERICAN INSURANCE
ORGANIZATION, LLC (d/b/a Sales Radix) Case 5:16-cv-03825-JLS (E.D.
Pa., July 14, 2016), alleges failure of the Defendants to pay
overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the
Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act.

Defendants are in the business of procuring health & life
insurance coverage for individuals and groups.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Peter Winebrake, Esq.
     Andrew R. Santillo, Esq.
     Mark J. Gottesfeld
     WINEBRAKE & SANTILLO, LLC
     715 Twining Road, Suite 211
     Dresher, PA 19025
     Phone: (215) 884-2491


INGRAM & ASSOCIATES: Faces "Smith-Parris" Suit in D.N.J.
--------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Ingram & Associates, LLC. The
case is styled KAREN SMITH-PARRIS, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. INGRAM & ASSOCIATES,
LLC, and JOHN DOES 1-25, the Defendant, Case No. 2:16-cv-04301-
SDW-SCM (D.N.J., July 15, 2016). The assigned Judge is Hon. Susan
D. Wigenton.

Ingram & Associates is a vital provider of in-depth counseling as
well as single session therapy for people and families in need.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Joseph K. Jones, Esq.
          JONES, WOLF & KAPASI, LLC
          375 Passaic Avenue, Suite 100
          Fairfield, NJ 07004
          Telephone: (973) 227 5900
          Facsimile: (973) 244 0019
          E-mail: jkj@legaljones.com


INSMED INC: Faces "Hoey" Suit Alleging Securities Act Violation
---------------------------------------------------------------
WILLIAM T. HOEY, Individually and On Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated, v. INSMED INCORPORATED., WILLIAM H. LEWIS, and
ANDREW T. DRECHSLER, Case 3:16-cv-04323-FLW-TJB (D.N.J., July 15,
2016), is a federal securities class action on behalf of a
purported class consisting of all persons other than Defendants
who purchased or otherwise acquired Insmed securities between
March 18, 2013 and June 8, 2016, both dates inclusive.

Insmed, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company, focuses on the
development and commercialization of inhaled therapies for
patients with serious lung diseases.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Bruce D. Greenberg, Esq.
     LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG, LLC
     570 Broad Street, Suite 1201
     Newark, NJ 07102
     Phone: (973) 623-3000
     Fax: (973) 623-0858
     E-mail: bgreenberg@litedepalma.com

        - and -

     Jeremy A. Lieberman, Esq.
     J. Alexander Hood II, Esq.
     Marc Gorrie, Esq.
     POMERANTZ LLP
     600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Phone: (212) 661-1100
     Fax: (212) 661-8665
     E-mail: jalieberman@pomlaw.com
             ahood@pomlaw.com
             mgorrie@pomlaw.com

        - and -

     Patrick V. Dahlstrom, Esq.
     POMERANTZ LLP
     10 South La Salle Street, Suite 3505
     Chicago, IL 60603
     Phone: (312) 377-1181
     Fax: (312) 377-1184
     E-mail: pdahlstrom@pomlaw.com

        - and -

     Peretz Bronstein, Esq.
     BRONSTEIN, GEWIRTZ, & GROSSMAN, LLC
     60 East 42nd Street, Suite 4600
     New York, NY 10165
     Phone: (212) 697-6484
     Fax: (212) 697-7296
     E-mail: peretz@bgandg.com


INTREXON CORP: Response to "Hoffman" Suit Deferred
--------------------------------------------------
In the case, RYAN HOFFMAN, Individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTREXON CORPORATION,
RANDAL J. KIRK, and RICK L. STERLING, Defendants, Case No. 3:16-
cv-02398-RS (N.D. Cal.), District Judge Richard Seeborg approved -
- without prejudice to any party -- a stipulation to extend
defendants' time to respond a class action complaint for
violations under the Federal Securities Law. The response to the
complaint was due July 5, 2016.

The extension follows the court's approval to consolidate
"Hoffman" suit with that of "Gibrall" suit, a similar complaint
filed on May 5, 2016. A deferred response is agreed for the
efficiency between the court and the parties in proceeding under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the
governing law in this case.

Pursuant to the approved stipulation: (1) defendants' counsel has
been authorized to, and has accepted service of the summons and
complaint on behalf of defendants; (2) defendants' shall not be
required to, and shall not waive any rights, arguments, or
defenses by waiting to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the
complaint in this action; (3) that after the lead plaintiff's
appointment, defendants and lead plaintiff shall promptly meet and
confer the schedule for the filing of the consolidated complaint
or designation of an operative complain, and a briefing schedule
for defendants' anticipated motion(s) to dismiss, and submit a
joint stipulation with a proposed schedule not later than ten
business days following the appointment of lead plaintiff; and (4)
that there will be no waiver of any defendants' rights or
positions in law or in equity.

A copy of the court's order dated June 29, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/OC3e8Ifrom Leagle.com.

Intrexon Corporation, et al., Defendants, represented by Jerome F.
Birn, Jr. -- jbirn@wsgr.com -- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Joni L. Ostler -- jostler@wsgr.com -- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati, Nicholas R. Miller -- nmiller@wsgr.com -- Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich and Rosati & Nina F. Locker -- nlocker@wsgr.com -- Wilson
Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.


INTREXON CORP: Response to "Gibrall" Suit Deferred
--------------------------------------------------
In the case, PATRICK M. and DEBORAH P. GIBRALL, Individually and
on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v.
INTREXON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, Case No. 3:16-cv-02457-
RS. (N.D. Cal.), District Judge Richard Seeborg approved --
without prejudice to any party -- a stipulation to extend
defendants' time to respond a class action complaint for
violations under the Federal Securities Law. The response to the
complaint was due July 11, 2016.

The extension follows the court's approval to consolidate
"Gibrall" suit with that of "Hoffman" suit, a similar complaint
filed on May 3, 2016. A deferred response is agreed for the
efficiency between the court and the parties in proceeding under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the
governing law in this case.

Pursuant to the approved stipulation: (1) defendants' shall not be
required to, and shall not waive any rights, arguments, or
defenses by waiting to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the
complaint in this action; (2) that after the lead plaintiff's
appointment, defendants and lead plaintiff shall promptly meet and
confer the schedule for the filing of the consolidated complaint
or designation of an operative complain, and a briefing schedule
for defendants' anticipated motion(s) to dismiss, and submit a
joint stipulation with a proposed schedule not later than ten
business days following the appointment of lead plaintiff; and (3)
that there will be no waiver of any defendants' rights or
positions in law or in equity.

A copy of the court's order dated June 29, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/6DuKZPfrom Leagle.com.

Intrexon Corporation, et al., Defendants, represented by Jerome F.
Birn, Jr. -- jbirn@wsgr.com -- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Joni L. Ostler -- jostler@wsgr.com -- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati, Nicholas R. Miller -- nmiller@wsgr.com -- Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich and Rosati & Nina F. Locker -- nlocker@wsgr.com -- Wilson
Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.


IWS INC: Judge Narrows Plaintiffs' Bid for Attorneys' Fees
----------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Joan B. Gottschall of the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern Division granted in part and denied in part
plaintiffs' petition for attorneys' fees in the case, JERRY
HAUSEN, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly
situated, known and unknown, Plaintiffs, v. IWS, INC., et al.,
Defendants, Case No. 13-cv-6051 (N.D. Ill.)

Jerry Hausen brought a putative class action complaint against
defendants IWS, Inc., Scott Fichtel, and Peter Fichtel, on August
26, 2013.  Hausen alleges that defendants failed to pay overtime
wages and other wages owed to Hausen and other employees of IWS in
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Illinois Minimum
Wage Law, and the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act.

On July 11, 2014, defendants' attorney mailed a Rule 68 offer of
judgment to plaintiffs' counsel. The offer of judgment was a one
page letter consisting of four paragraphs. Defendants offered a
total sum of $35,000 to Hausen and Navarra. Plaintiffs filed a
notice of acceptance to the offer of judgment on July 23, 2014.

Plaintiffs stated in their notice that defendants' offer does not
provide for the payment of costs and attorney's fees, which are
payable to a prevailing party under the federal and state laws
pursuant to which this case arises. Plaintiffs then declared that
they intended to move to recover their costs and attorneys' fees
by separate motion.

Defendants objected to plaintiffs' notice of acceptance and
asserted that their offer included attorneys' fees and costs,
contrary to plaintiffs' interpretation of the offer. Plaintiffs
made a corrected motion for entry of judgment in their favor in
the amount of $35,000, plus an award of costs and attorneys' fees.
Plaintiffs' counsel attached billing records through July 31, 2014
to support Plaintiffs' fee request.

The court ruled in favor of plaintiffs and entered judgment in the
amount of $35,000. The court also found that Plaintiffs were
entitled to attorneys' fees.  However, the court declined to award
fees before the parties complied with Local Rule ("LR") 54.3. The
parties engaged in a LR 54.3 conference and came to an agreement
regarding some, but not all, of plaintiffs' requested fees.
Plaintiffs filed a petition for attorneys' fees.

Judge Gottschall granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs'
petition for attorneys' fees. Plaintiffs are awarded $55,674.70 in
fees and $826.11 in expenses for a total amount of $56,500.81

A copy of Judge Gottschall's memorandum opinion and order dated
July 6, 2016, is available at http://goo.gl/CX5wyWfrom
Leagle.com.

Plaintiff, represented by Charles A. Valente --
cvalente@krasnowsaunders.com -- William D. Nagel --
wnagel@krasnowsaunders.com -- Heather J Kuhn O'Toole --
hotoole@krasnowsaunders.com -- at Krasnow Saunders Kaplan &
Beninati, LLP

Defendants, represented by Joshua Brandon Rosenzweig --
jrosenzweig@ottosenbritz.com -- at Ottosen Britz


JANSSEN RESEARCH: Faces "Hardenbrook" Suit in La. Over Xarelto
--------------------------------------------------------------
WENDY HARDENBROOK v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, f/k/a
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC;
JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC; JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., f/k/a JANSSEN
PHARMACEUTICA INC, f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC; JOHNSON & JOHNSON COMPANY BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC; BAYER PHARMA AG; BAYER CORPORATION; BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC;
BAYER HEALTHCARE AG; and BAYER AG; Case 2:16-cv-12769 (E.D. La.,
July 14, 2016), alleges that Plaintiff suffered damages as a
result of Defendants' wrongful conduct in connection with the
development, design, testing, manufacture, distribution, and sale
of Xarelto to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in
patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Defendants designed, researched, manufactured, tested, advertised,
promoted, marketed, sold, and distributed Xarelto.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Richard J. Hood, Esq.
     789 Sherman St., Suite 420
     Denver, CO 80203
     Phone: (844) 446-4663
     Fax: (303) 362-6770
     E-mail: rich@attorneysfor.us

        - and -

     Randy V. Pelham, Esq.
     2520-2 Barrington Circle
     Tallahassee, FL 32308
     Phone: (850) 383-6600
     E-mail: rpelham@pelhamlaw.com


JUNO THERAPEUTICS: Faces "Veljanoski" Securities Suit in Wash.
--------------------------------------------------------------
GOCE VELJANOSKI, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, v. JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC., and HANS E.
BISHOP, individually and on behalf of the marital community, Case
2:16-cv-01069 (W.D. Wash., July 12, 2016), alleges violations of
the Securities Exchange Act over the disclosure of information
about its product candidate called JCAR015.

Juno Therapeutics, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company that is
developing cell-based cancer immunotherapies.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Kim D. Stephens, Esq.
     Janissa A. Strabuk, Esq.
     TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC
     1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2200
     Seattle, WA 98101
     Phone: (206) 682-5600
     Fax: (206) 682-2992
     E-mail: kstephens@tousley.com
             jstrabuk@tousley.com

        - and -

     Jeffrey C. Block, Esq.
     Joel A. Fleming, Esq.
     BLOCK & LEVITON LLP
     155 Federal Street, Suite 400
     Boston, MS 02110
     Phone: (617)398-5600
     Fax: (617)507-6020
     E-mail: jeff@blockesq.com
             joel@blockesq.com

        - and -

     Jaimie M. O'Tey, Esq.
     TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC
     1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2200
     Seattle, WA 98101
     Phone: (206) 682-5600
     Fax: (206) 682-2992


KENTUCKY: Woodcock's Suit Amendments Fails to Win Judge's Nod
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, BRIAN WOODCOCK, Plaintiff, v. KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 5:12-CV-00135-
GNS-LKK (W.D. Ky.), District Judge Greg N. Stivers dismissed
plaintiff's motion to amend complaint, after the deadline for
amended pleadings had passed and without any showing of good cause
to secure the judge's consent.

The court ruled that a party seeking to amend its pleadings after
a deadline set by court order must show good cause in order to
procure the court's consent. To demonstrate good cause, a party
must show that despite their diligence, the time table could not
have reasonably been met.

The Plaintiff failed to articulate how he exercised due diligence
to obtain the information giving rise to the additional claims and
parties he seeks to assert in his Complaint.

The allegations involve the Kentucky Department of Corrections'
failure to meet its duty to provide proper medical care to
plaintiff for Hepatitis C while being incarcerated.

A copy of the court's decision dated July 6, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/ufQpP8from Leagle.com.

Kentucky Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants,
represented by Alea A. Arnett -- aarnett@wwwatty.com -- Kentucky
Justice & Public Safety Cabinet.


KEVIN B. WILSON LAW: Faces "Tucker" Suit in M.D. Fla.
-----------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Kevin B. Wilson Law Offices. The
case is captioned Teisha Tucker, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Kevin B. Wilson and
Kevin B. Wilson Law Offices, the Defendants, Case No. 6:16-cv-
01286-GKS-KRS (M.D. Fla., July 18, 2016). The assigned Senior
Judge is Hon. G. Kendall Sharp.

Wilson Law Offices is a collection agency firm.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Alex A. Stern, Esq.
          LITTLE GUY LAW FIRM
          1300 Washington Ave. No. 191625
          Miami Beach, FL 33119
          Telephone: (305) 577 3996
          Facsimile: (305) 577 3558
          E-mail: astern@vpl-law.com


KRISPY KREME: "Lomax" Sues over Shady Merger Deal
-------------------------------------------------
Jonnie Lomax and Harold Lomax, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Krispy Kreme Doughnuts,
Inc., Tim E. Bentsen, Charles A. Blixt, Lynn Crump-Caine, Carl E.
Lee, Jr., C. Stephen Lynn, Robert S. Mccoy, Jr., James H. Morgan,
Andrew J. Schindler, Lizanne Thomas and Anthony Thompson,
Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-923 (M.D.N.C., July 8, 2016), seeks
preliminary and permanent enjoinment of the defendants from
proceeding with, consummating, or closing a merger; rescissory
damages; reasonable attorneys' and experts' fees; and such other
and further relief under the Exchange Act.

Krispy Kreme is to be acquired by JAB Holdings B.V. through JAB
Holdings' wholly-owned subsidiaries Cotton Parent, Inc. and Cotton
Merger Sub, Inc. for $21.00 in cash per Krispy Kreme common share.
Plaintiff alleges that this was a one-sided deal in favour of JAB
and that the board did not consider other better options for the
said sale.

Defendant is a branded specialty retailer and wholesaler of
premium quality sweet treats and complementary products. Tim E.
Bentsen, Charles A. Blixt, Lynn Crump-Caine, Carl E. Lee, Jr., C.
Stephen Lynn, Robert S. Mccoy, Jr., James H. Morgan, Andrew J.
Schindler, Lizanne Thomas and Anthony Thompson all held board
position during the merger deal.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Stuart H. Russell, Esq.
     WILSON & HELMS LLP
     110 Oakwood Drive, Suite 400
     Winston-Salem, NC 27103
     Tel: (336) 631-8866
     Fax: (336) 631-9770
     Email: srussell@wilsonhelms.com

            - and -

     Richard A. Acocelli, Esq.
     Michael A. Rogovin, Esq.
     Kelly C. Keenan, Esq.
     WEISSLAW LLP
     1500 Broadway, 16th Floor
     New York, NY 10036
     Tel: (212) 682-3025
     Fax: (212) 682-3010
     Email: racocelli@weisslawllp.com
            mrogovin@weisslawllp.com
            kkeenan@weisslawllp.com

            - and -

     J. Brandon Walker, Esq.
     BRAGAR EAGEL & SQUIRE P.C.
     885 Third Avenue, Suite 3040
     New York, NY 10022
     Tel: (212) 308-5858
     Email: walker@bespc.com


LA MANSION: Faces "Castillo" Suit Alleging Violation of FLSA
------------------------------------------------------------
ALEXANDER PINERO CASTILLO and all others similarly situated under
29 U.S.C. 216(b), v. LA MANSION DEL BAKERY LLC d/b/a CASA POTIN
BAKERY, FRANCESCO D'ORSO and ANGELA LUCCHESE, Case 1:16-cv-23053-
JEM (S.D. Fla., July 14, 2016), was filed under the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

CASA POTIN BAKERY is a Cuban American bakery.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     J.H. Zidell, Esq.
     J.H. ZIDELL, P.A.
     300 71st Street, Suite 605
     Miami Beach, FL 33141
     Phone: (305) 865-6766
     Fax: (305) 865-7167
     E-mail: ZABOGADO@AOL.COM


LANNETT CO: AHOLD USA Sues Over Alleged Violation of Sherman Act
----------------------------------------------------------------
AHOLD USA, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly
situated, v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.,
WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, ALLERGAN PLC, MYLAN, INC.,
AND PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC., Case 2:16-cv-03844-CMR
(E.D. Pa., July 15, 2016), was filed on behalf of a purported
class of direct purchasers who purchased generic digoxin or
doxycycline from October 1, 2012 to the present.  The Plaintiff
alleges violations of the Sherman Act.

Lannett Company, Inc. is a distributor of generic digoxin and
generic doxycycline, among other generic drugs.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Dianne M. Nast, Esq.
     Erin C. Burns, Esq.
     NAST LAW LLC
     1101 Market Street, Suite 2801
     Philadelphia, PA 19107
     Phone: (215) 923-9300
     Fax: (215) 923-9302
     E-mail: dnast@nastlaw.com
             ebums@nastlaw.com

        - and -

     Thomas M. Sobol, Esq.
     David S. Nalven, Esq.
     Lauren G. Barnes, Esq.
     Kristen A. Johnston, Esq.
     HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
     55 Cambridge Parkway, Suite 301
     Cambridge, MA 02142
     Phone: (617) 482-3700
     Fax: (617) 482-3003
     E-mail: tom@hbsslaw.com
             davidn@hbsslaw.com
             lauren@hbsslaw.com
             kristenj@hbsslaw.com

        - and -

     John D. Radice, Esq.
     RADICE LAW FIRM
     34 Sunset Blvd
     Long Beach, NJ 08008
     Phone: (646) 386-7688
     Fax: (609) 385-0745
     E-mail: jradice@radicelawfirm.com


LCC INTERNATIONAL: Faces Suit in Mo. Alleging Violation of FLSA
---------------------------------------------------------------
RICHARD TORGERSON, ROBERT HALL, SHELLEY GORDON, BRYON HUGHES,
MOSES BOYE-DOE on Behalf of Themselves, and All Others Similarly
Situated, v. LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Virginia Corporation, and
KENNY YOUNG, BRIAN DUNN, REBECCA STAHL AND DAN MOSS, Case 2:16-cv-
02495-DDC-TJJ (W.D. Mo., February 2, 2016), seeks to recover
alleged unpaid overtime compensation, interest, liquidated
damages, attorneys' fees and costs, injunctive and declaratory
relief enjoining Plaintiff from further violations of the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Defendant LCC International, Inc. was engaged in the business of
providing wireless voice and data engineering services to the
telecommunications industry.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     Gregory P. Goheen, Esq.
     Robert L. Turner IV, Esq.
     MCANANY, VAN CLEAVE & PHILLIPS, P.A.
     10 E. Cambridge Circle Drive, Suite 300
     Kansas City, KS 66103
     Phone (913) 371-3838
     Fax (913) 371-4722
     E-mail: ggoheen@mvplaw.com
             rturner@mvplaw.com


LOMA RENTALS: Faces "Arriola" Lawsuit Alleging FLSA Violation
-------------------------------------------------------------
RUDY ARRIOLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY
SITUATED, v. LOMA RENTALS, L.L.C.; WILLIAM HILL; AND DOUGLAS
FARRELL, Case 5:16-cv-00720 (W.D. Tex., July 15, 2016), seeks to
recover overtime compensation and all other available remedies
under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Loma Rentals, LLC offers oil and gas equipment rental, production
testing, flowback and gate guard services in Texas, Louisiana and
Oklahoma.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Josh Borsellino, Esq.
     BORSELLINO, P.C.
     1020 Macon St., Ste. 15
     Fort Worth, TX 76102
     Phone: 817.908.9861
     Fax: 817.394.2412
     E-mail: josh@dfwcounsel.com


LONDON CORRECTIONAL: Sabo's Motions Nixed Prior to Sept 6 Reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, LARRY SABO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LONDON
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et al., Respondents, Case No. 2:16-cv-
536 (S.D. Ohio), District Judge Algenon L. Marbley denied
Petitioner's Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing, Motion to Appoint
Counsel, Motion for Discovery, and Motion for Class Certification
because Respondents have not yet responded to the Petition which
reply is due on September 6, 2016.

The case involves alleged violations against Petitioner's rights
under federal and state law for the retroactive application of
Ohio's parole guidelines. Not until the Respondents replied on the
petition, it is unclear that discovery or an evidentiary hearing
will be required to resolve the issues. It is likewise unclear
that the appointment of counsel is necessary. With no counsel to
assist, certification of the action as a class action would be
inappropriate.

A copy of the Court's Order dated July 18, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/PCUoBifrom Leagle.com.

Warden London Correctional Institution, Respondent, represented by
Maura O'Neill Jaite -- maura@mauraoneill.com -- Ohio Attorney
General's Office.


MARKETO INC: Faces "Rosati" Securities Suit Over Sale to Vista
--------------------------------------------------------------
ROBERT ROSATI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, v. MARKETO, INC., PHILLIP M. FERNANDEZ, LYNNE BIGGAR,
CAMBRIA DUNAWAY, ROGER S. SIBONI, SUSAN L. BOSTROM, and TAE HEA
NAHM, WESLEY R. WASSON, Case 4:16-cv-03907-CW (N.D. Cal., July 12,
2016), alleges violation of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission in relation to the acquisition of the Company by Vista
Equity Partners Fund VI, L.P.

Marketo Inc. makes marketing automation software for companies.

The plaintiff is represented by:

     Adam McCall, Esq.
     LEVI & KORSINSKY LLP
     445 South Figueroa Street, 31st Floor
     Los Angeles, CA 90071
     Phone: (213) 985-7890
     Fax: (202) 333-2121
     E-mail: amccall@zlk.com

        - and -

     Joseph Levi, Esq.
     Michael H. Rosner, Esq.
     Justin G. Sherman, Esq.
     LEVI & KORSINSKY LLP
     30 Broad Street, 24th Floor
     New York, NY 10004
     Phone: (212) 363-7500
     Fax: (212) 363-7171
     E-mail: jlevi@zlk.com
             mrosner@zlk.com
             jsherman@zlk.com


MATCH GROUP: Glancy Prongay & Bragar Eagel Named Co-Lead Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge David L. Horan of the Northern District of Texas,
Dallas Division, ruled on the parties' motions for appointment of
lead plaintiff and lead counsel in the case DAVID M. STEIN,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff, v. MATCH GROUP, INC., ET AL., Defendants, No. 3:16-cv-
549-L, Consolidated with No. 3:16-cv-668-L (N.D. Tex.)

Magistrate Judge Horan granted Mary McClosekey and Craig Kneller's
motion for appointment as lead plaintiff and approval of lead
counsel. The court designates Mary McClosekey and Craig Kneller as
lead plaintiff and approves Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP and Bragar
Eagel & Squire, P.C. as co-lead counsel and Kendall Law Group,
PLLC as liaison counsel.

Plaintiff David M. Stein in a putative class action in Case No.
3:16-cv-549-L and plaintiff Stephany Kam-Wan Chan in the related
putative class action in Case No. 3:16-cv-668-L, as well as other
prospective plaintiffs or class members, filed motions to
consolidate the two actions, which the court granted and ordered
Case No. 3:16-cv-668-L closed and consolidated under Case No.
3:16-cv-549-L.

The plaintiffs brought claims under Sections 11, 12(a), and 15 of
the Securities Act of 1933, against defendants Match Group, Inc.,
Gregory R. Blatt, Gary Swidler, Michael H. Schwerdtman, Gregg J.
Winiarski, Joseph M. Levin, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Allen &
Company LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated,
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., Barclays
Capital Inc., BNP Paribas Securities Corp., PNC Capital Markets
LLC, Cowen and Company, LLC, SG Americas Securities, LLC, Fifth
Third Securities, Inc., and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.

Plaintiffs allege that Match Group operates dating products, such
as Match and OkCupid, as well as, various test preparation,
academic tutoring, and college counseling services. Plaintiffs
allege that defendants made inaccurate statements in the company's
Registration Statement and the Prospectus issued in connection
with the initial public offering during the fourth quarter in late
November 2015 and led investors to believe that the company's
Princeton Review business had turned a corner and was experiencing
profitability for the first time. Plaintiffs allege that the
statements were inaccurate when made because, as later revealed by
defendant Blatt during a February 3, 2016 conference call,
defendants knew and failed to disclose in late November 2015 that
the 2015 fourth quarter revenue and financial results would be
adversely impacted by two items.

Three competing motions for appointment as lead plaintiff and lead
counsel ensued. The motion of Kenneth Varin for appointment as
lead plaintiff and approval of his selection of counsel, Mary
McCloskey and Craig Kneller's motion for appointment as lead
plaintiff and approval of lead counsel and the motion for
appointment of Stein and Jenkins as lead plaintiffs and for
approval of selection of lead and liaison counsel.

A copy of Magistrate Judge Horan's memorandum opinion and order
dated June 9, 2016, is available at http://goo.gl/XIdsHCfrom
Leagle.com.

Mary McCloskey, Craig Kneller, and David M Stein, Plaintiffs,
represented by J Brandon Walker -- walker@bespc.com -- Todd Harris
Henderson -- henderson@bespc.com -- at Bragar Eagel & Squire PC;
Lesley F Portnoy -- lportnoy@glancylaw.com -- Lionel Z Glancy --
lglancy@glancylaw.com -- at Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP; Jamie
Jean McKey -- jmckey@kendalllawgroup.com -- Joe Kendall --
jkendall@kendalllawgroup.com -- at Kendall Law Group LLP

Stephany Kam-Wan Chan, Consol Plaintiff, represented by Brian
Schall -- b_schall@u.pacific.edu -- Michael Goldberg --
hurt-law@psnw.com -- at Goldberg Law PC; J Alexander Hood, II --
ahood@pomlaw.com -- Jeremy Alan Lieberman --
jalieberman@pomlaw.com -- Marc Gorrie -- mgorrie@pomlaw.com --
Patrick V Dahlstrom -- pdahlstrom@pomlaw.com -- at Pomerantz LLP;
Willie Briscoe -- wbriscoe@thebriscoelawfirm.com -- at Briscoe Law
Firm; Peretz Bronstein -- peretz@bgandg.com -- at Bronstein,
Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Match Group Inc, Gregory R Blatt, Gary Swidler, Michael H
Schwerdtman, Gregg J Winiarski, and Joseph M Levin, Defendants,
represented by R Thaddeus Behrens -- thad.behrens@haynesboone.com
-- at Haynes & Boone LLP; Bradley R Wilson -- BRWilson@wlrk.com
-- Stephen R DiPrima -- SRDiPrima@wlrk.com -- at Wachtell Lipton
Rosen & Katz

JP Morgan Securities LLC, Allen & Company LLC, Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc,
BMO Capital Markets Corp, Barclays Capital Inc., BNP Paribas
Securities Corp, PNC Capital Markets LLC, Cowen and Company LLC,
SG Americas Securities LLC, Fifth Third Securities Inc., and
Oppenheimer & Co Inc., Defendants, represented by Yolanda Cornejo
Garcia -- ygarcia@sidley.com -- Penny P Reid -- preid@sidley.com -
- Yvette Ostolaza -- yvette.ostolaza@sidley.com -- at Sidley
Austin LLP

Adam Marigliano, Shen Shen, and Liwei Sun, Movants, represented by
Jeremy Alan Lieberman-- jalieberman@pomlaw.com -- J Alexander
Hood, II -- ahood@pomlaw.com -- Patrick V Dahlstrom --
pdahlstrom@pomlaw.com -- at Pomerantz LLP; Brian Schall --
b_schall@u.pacific.edu -- Michael Goldberg -- hurt-law@psnw.com
-- at Goldberg Law PC

Kenneth Varin, Movant, represented by Brian P Lauten --
blauten@deanslyons.com -- at Deans & Lyons LLP


MDL 2067: "Kiossovski" Complaint Survives Dismissal Bid
-------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton of the District of
Massachusetts denied defendants' motion in the case entitled In
re: CELEXA AND LEXAPRO MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
DELANA S. KIOSSOVSKI and RENEE RAMIREZ, Plaintiffs, v. FOREST
LABORATORIES, INC., FOREST LABORATORIES, LLC and FOREST
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendants, Civil Action No. 14-13848-NMG,
MDL No. 09-02067-NMG (D. Mass.)

Defendants move to dismiss and/or strike certain claims in the
amended complaint.  Judge Gorton denied defendants' motion to
dismiss and/or to strike certain claims in the amended complaint.

Defendants Forest Laboratories, Inc., Forest Laboratories, LLC and
Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Forest) marketed and sold Celexa and
Lexapro, an anti-depressant drugs.  Forest sought to market both
drugs for treating major depressive disorder (MDD) in children and
adolescents.

In August 2014, Marlene LoConte and Delana Kiossovski commenced an
action in the Western District of Washington by filing a complaint
on behalf of themselves and putative consumer classes. They
alleged that Forest fraudulently promoted the pediatric and
adolescent use of Celexa and Lexapro despite knowing that the
drugs did not provide any clinically significant benefit over
placebos in treating MDD. The case was transferred to the District
of Massachusetts pursuant to a multi-district litigation
assignment to this Court in October 2014.

In June 2015, Judge Gorton allowed defendants' motion to dismiss
the complaint with respect to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO), the Massachusetts Consumer Protection
Act, M.G.L. c. 93A and unjust enrichment claims brought by LoConte
and denied the motion with respect to the RICO, Washington
Consumer Protection Act (CPA) and unjust enrichment claims brought
by Kiossovski.

Plaintiffs amended the complaint in January 2016 by replacing
LoConte with Renee Ramirez as the second plaintiff and putative
class representative.  The amended complaint raised two RICO
claims by Kiossovski and Ramirez, an unjust enrichment claim by
both plaintiffs and a CPA claim by Kiossovski.

A copy of Judge Gorton's memorandum and order dated June 9, 2016,
is available at http://goo.gl/xkCbaSfrom Leagle.com.

Delana S Kiossovski, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher L.
Coffin -- ccoffin@pbclawfirm.com -- Nicholas R. Rockforte --
nrockforte@pbclawfirm.com -- Pendley, Baudin & Coffin, LLP;
Michael L. Baum -- mbaum@baumhedlundlaw.com -- Robert Brent Wisner
-- at Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, P.C.; Sam Griffin at Law
Offices of S. Samuel Griffin; Corrie Johnson Yackulic at
Schroeter, Goldmark & Bender

Renee Ramirez, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher L. Coffin --
ccoffin@pbclawfirm.com -- Nicholas R. Rockforte --
nrockforte@pbclawfirm.com -- Pendley, Baudin & Coffin, LLP;
Michael L. Baum -- mbaum@baumhedlundlaw.com -- Robert Brent Wisner
-- at Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, P.C.

Forest Laboratories Inc., Defendant, represented by Edwin G.
Schallert -- egschallert@debevoise.com -- Danielle E. Thorne --
dethorne@debevoise.com -- J. Robert Abraham --
jrabraham@debevoise.com -- Kristin D. Kiehn --
kdkiehn@debevoise.com -- at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP; Joshua D.
Nadreau at Sugarman, Rogers, Barshak & Cohen, P.C.

Forest Laboratories, LLC and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
Defendants, represented by Edwin G. Schallert --
egschallert@debevoise.com -- J. Robert Abraham --
jrabraham@debevoise.com -- Kristin D. Kiehn --
kdkiehn@debevoise.com -- Peter Simpson Ross -- pross@debevoise.com
-- at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP


MDL 2672: $15-Bil. Settlement in 2.0L Cars Suit Wins Initial OK
---------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco on July 26
granted preliminary approval to a $15 billion settlement reached
in the class action lawsuit against Volkswagen over alleged
emission scandal.

Volkswagen has reached a deal to resolve litigation involving 2.0-
liter Volkswagen and Audi diesel vehicles with the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, the California Attorney General,
the California Air Resources Board, the Federal Trade Commission,
and current vehicle owners/lessees and certain former vehicle
owners/lessees in the United States.

Volkswagen has agreed to:

     -- buy back, terminate leases or provide approved emissions
modifications for nearly 475,000 2.0-liter TDI diesel cars in the
United States;

     -- provide cash payments to owners/lessees?

     -- pay for environmental remediation? and

     -- promote zero emissions vehicle technology.

The goal of the Volkswagen Class Settlement Program is to
compensate everyone who owned or leased a Volkswagen or Audi 2.0-
liter TDI vehicle on September 18, 2015 (the date the emissions
allegations became public), or who now owns an Eligible Vehicle.
Volkswagen has agreed to create a single funding pool of a maximum
of $10,033,000,000 from which Class Members will be compensated
under the Class Settlement Program.   An executive summary of the
proposed benefits to owners of affected VW vehicles is available
at https://is.gd/vQgUB5

Under its agreement with the U.S. Justice Department, Volkswagen
is required to pay a total of $4.7 billion -- on top of the
$10.033 billion funding pool for the Buyback and Emissions
Modification program -- in environmental reparations, to be
administered and enforced by the EPA.

Volkswagen also has reached a deal with a consortium of Attorneys
General to resolve their states' unfair and deceptive practice act
claims against both Volkswagen and Porsche in exchange for (1)
$1,100 for each 2.0- and 3.0-liter vehicle originally sold or
leased in the participating states prior to September 18, 2015,
(2) payment of $20,000,000 to the National Association of
Attorneys General, and (3) an injunction against future unfair and
deceptive acts or practices.  The Attorneys General settlement
increases the total value of the Settlements to well over $15
billion.

Additional information on the Settlement is available at:

     https://www.vwcourtsettlement.com/en/

Judge Breyer set an October 18 hearing for final approval of the
settlement.  A status conference is set for August 25, 2016, 8:00
a.m.

Class Notice Program begins today, July 27, and will end
August 19.

The case is, In Re: Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales
Practices, And Products Liability Litigation, Case 3:15-md-02672-
CRB (N.D. Cal.).

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs:

     Elizabeth J. Cabraser, Esq.
     LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
     275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
     San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
     Telephone: (415) 956-1000
     Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
     E-mail: ecabraser@lchb.com

Plaintiffs' Steering Committee

     Benjamin L. Bailey
     BAILEY GLASSER LLP
     209 Capitol Street
     Charleston, WV 25301
     Telephone: 304.345.6555
     Facsimile: 304.342.1110
     E-mail: Bbailey@baileyglasser.com

          - and -

     Steve W. Berman
     HAGENS BERMAN
     1918 8th Avenue, Suite 3300
     Seattle, WA 98101
     Telephone: 206.623.7292
     Facsimile: 206.623.0594
     E-mail: steve@hbsslaw.com

          - and -

     David Boies
     BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
     333 Main Street
     Armonk, NY 10504
     Telephone: 914.749.8200
     Facsimile: 914.749.8300
     E-mail: dboies@bsfllp.com

          - and -

     David Seabold Casey, Jr.
     CASEY GERRY SCHENK FRANCAVILLA BLATT & PENFIELD, LLP
     110 Laurel Street
     San Diego, CA 92101-1486
     Telephone: 619.238.1811
     Facsimile: 619.544.9232
     E-mail: dcasey@cglaw.com

          - and -

     James E. Cecchi
     CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO P.C.
     5 Becker Farm Road
     Roseland, NJ 07068-1739
     Telephone: 973.994.1700
     Facsimile: 973.994.1744
     E-mail: jcecchi@carellabyrne.com

          - and -

     Roxanne Barton Conlin
     ROXANNE CONLIN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
     319 Seventh Street, Suite 600
     Des Moines, IA 50309
     Telephone: 515.283.1111
     Facsimile: 515.282.0477
     E-mail: roxlaw@aol.com

          - and -

     Jayne Conroy
     SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC
     112 Madison Avenue
     New York, NY 10016-7416
     Telephone: 212.784.6400
     Facsimile: 212.213.5949
     E-mail: jconroy@simmonsfirm.com

          - and -

     Paul J. Geller
     ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
     120 East Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500
     Boca Raton, FL 33432
     Telephone: 561.750.3000
     Facsimile: 561.750.3364
     E-mail: pgeller@rgrdlaw.com

          - and -

     Robin L. Greenwald
     WEITZ & LUXENBERG P.C.
     700 Broadway
     New York, NY 10003
     Telephone: 212.558.5500
     Facsimile: 212.344.5461
     E-mail: rgreenwald@weitzlux.com

          - and -

     Michael D. Hausfeld
     HAUSFELD
     1700 K Street, N.W., Suite 650
     Washington, DC 20006
     Telephone: 202.540.7200
     Facsimile: 202.540.7201
     E-mail: mhausfeld@hausfeld.com

          - and -

     Michael Everett Heygood
     HEYGOOD, ORR & PEARSON
     6363 North State Highway 161, Suite 450
     Irving, TX 75038
     Telephone: 214.237.9001
     Facsimile: 214.237-9002
     E-mail: Michael@hop-law.com

          - and -

     Adam J. Levitt
     GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
     30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2350
     Chicago, IL 60602
     Telephone: 312.610.5400
     Facsimile: 312.214.0001
     E-mail: alevitt@gelaw.com

          - and -

     W. Daniel "Dee" Miles III
     BEASLEY ALLEN LAW FIRM
     218 Commerce Street
     Montgomery, AL 36104
     Telephone: 800.898.2034
     Facsimile: 334.954.7555
     E-mail: dee.miles@beasleyallen.com

          - and -

     Frank Mario Pitre
     COTCHETT PITRE & McCARTHY LLP
     840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
     Burlingame, CA 94010
     Telephone: 650.697.6000
     Facsimile: 650.697.0577
     E-mail: fpitre@cpmlegal.com

          - and -

     Joseph F. Rice
     MOTLEY RICE, LLC
     28 Bridgeside Boulevard
     Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
     Telephone: 843.216.9000
     Facsimile: 843.216.9450
     E-mail: jrice@motleyrice.com

          - and -

     Lynn Lincoln Sarko
     KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.
     1201 3rd Avenue, Suite 3200
     Seattle, WA 98101-3052
     Telephone: 206.623.1900
     Facsimile: 206.623.3384
     E-mail: lsarko@kellerrohrback.com

          - and -

     J. Gerard Stranch IV
     BRANSTETTER, STRANCH & JENNINGS, PLLC
     223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200
     Nashville, TN 37203
     Telephone: 615.254.8801
     Facsimile: 615.250.3937
     E-mail: gerards@bsjfirm.com

          - and -

     Rosemary M. Rivas
     FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP
     One California Street, Suite 900
     San Francisco, CA 94111
     Telephone: 415.398.8700
     Facsimile: 415.393.8704
     E-mail: rrivas@finkelsteinthompson.com

          - and -

     Christopher A. Seeger
     SEEGER WEISS LLP
     77 Water Street
     New York, NY 10005-4401
     Telephone: 212.584.0700
     Facsimile: 212.584.0799
     E-mail: cseeger@seegerweiss.com

          - and -

     Roland K. Tellis
     BARON & BUDD, P.C.
     15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600
     Encino, CA 91436
     Telephone: 818.839.2320
     Facsimile: 818.986.9698
     E-mail: trellis@baronbudd.com

          - and -

     Lesley Elizabeth Weaver
     BLOCK & LEVITON LLP
     155 Federal Street, Suite 400
     Boston, MA 02110
     Telephone: 617.398.5600
     Facsimile: 617.507.6020
     E-mail: lweaver@blockesq.com

Counsel for the United States:

     JOHN C. CRUDEN
     Assistant Attorney General
     Environment and Natural Resources Division
     U.S. Department of Justice

     JOSHUA H. VAN EATON
     BETHANY ENGEL
     GABRIEL ALLEN
     LESLIE ALLEN
     PATRICK BRYAN
     NIGEL COONEY
     KAREN DWORKIN
     DANICA GLASER
     ANNA GRACE
     SHEILA McANANEY
     MARCELLO MOLLO
     ROBERT MULLANEY
     ERIKA ZIMMERMAN
     IVA ZIZA
     Environmental Enforcement Section
     Environment and Natural Resources Division
     United States Department of Justice
     P.O. Box 7611
     Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
     Telephone: (202) 514-5474
     Facsimile: (202) 514-0097
     E-mail: josh.van.eaton@usdoj.gov
             bethany.engel@usdoj.gov


MDL 2672: VW Working on New Settlement Proposal for 3.0L Cars
-------------------------------------------------------------
Reuters reports that Volkswagen is planning to offer a new
proposal to fix 85,000 polluting 3.0 liter vehicles after
regulators rejected an earlier plan, a Justice Department lawyer
said on July 26.

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco
granted preliminary approval to a $15 billion settlement reached
in a class action lawsuit against Volkswagen over alleged emission
scandal.  The deals resolve litigation involving 2.0-liter
Volkswagen and Audi diesel vehicles. The deals were reached by the
German automaker with the United States Environmental Protection
Agency, the California Attorney General, the California Air
Resources Board, the Federal Trade Commission, and current vehicle
owners/lessees and certain former vehicle owners/lessees in the
United States.

According to Reuters, the California Air Resources Board earlier
this month rejected as insufficient a plan to fix the vehicles,
which include VW and Audi luxury cars from model years 2009-2016.

At the July 26 hearing, Justice Department lawyer Joshua Van Eaton
said Volkswagen had been meeting with regulators in recent weeks
and planned to offer a new fix proposal in August.

According to Reuters, Judge Breyer said he wants another update on
the 3.0 liter vehicle talks at a hearing on Aug. 25.


MERCANTILE ADJUSTMENT: Faces "Maslaton" Suit in E.D.N.Y.
--------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Mercantile Adjustment Bureau,
LLC. The case is captioned Moshe Maslaton, on behalf of himself
and all other similarly situated consumers, Plaintiff, v.
Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC, the Defendant, Case No. 1:16-
cv-03967 (E.D.N.Y., July 15, 2016).

Mercantile Adjustment is a full service, nationally licensed
collections and accounts receivable management firm.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Adam Jon Fishbein, Esq.
          ADAM J. FISHBEIN,
          ATTORNEY AT LAW
          483 Chestnut Street
          Cedarhurst, NY 11516
          Telephone: (516) 791 4400
          Facsimile: (516) 791 4411
          E-mail: fishbeinadamj@gmail.com

The Defendant appears pro se.


MIDLAND CREDIT: Faces "Hofstatter" Suit Over FDCPA Breach
---------------------------------------------------------
ROBERT HOFSTATTER on behalf of himself and all other similarly
situated consumers v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., MIDLAND
FUNDING, LLC, PRESSLER & PRESSLER, LLP AND DARYL J. KIPNIS, Case
1:16-cv-03885-DLI-SMG (E.D.N.Y., July 13, 2016), alleges violation
of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Defendant, Midland Credit Management, Inc. is a "debt collector."

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Adam J. Fishbein, Esq.
     ADAM J. FISHBEIN, P.C
     483 Chestnut Street
     Cedarhurst, NY 11516
     Phone: (516) 791-4400
     Fax: (516) 791-4411


MINNEAPOLIS, MN: CA Affirms Ruling in "DRB #24" Suit
----------------------------------------------------
A three-panel judge of the Court of Appeals of Minnesota affirmed
a District Court's decision in the case captioned, DRB #24, LLC,
on behalf of itself and other similarly situated property owners
in Minneapolis that have been assessed vacant building
registration fees in 2013, Appellant, v. City of Minneapolis,
Respondent, No. A15-1844 (Minn. App.).

The case involves allegations of the Appellant, a former owner of
a vacant building, that the 2013 VBR fee was invalid as it
erroneously calculated and imposed in violation of several state
and federal constitutional and statutory provisions. A VBR fee is
an imposed special assessment against owners of vacant building.

The Appeals Court concluded that the Appellant's claims became
moot when its property was forfeited to the state and the disputed
special assessment was canceled, the collateral-consequences
exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply, and the
district court correctly granted Respondent's motion for summary
judgment.

A copy of the Court's Order dated July 18, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/h4bIJSfrom Leagle.com.

Susan L. Segal -- susan.segal@ci.minneapolis.mn.us -- Minneapolis
City Attorney, Gregory P. Sautter --
gregory.sautter@ci.minneapolis.mn.us -- Assistant City Attorney,
Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent.


MONTGOMERY: Bid to Dismiss "McConville" Suit Denied
---------------------------------------------------
District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino of the Northern District of New
York, denied defendants' partial motion to dismiss in the case
MARTHA McCONVILLE, Plaintiff, v. JEREMY MONTRYM, JENNIFER YOUNG,
JENNIFER WINTERMUTE, SHAWN BYRNE, JOHN WEMPLE, KEVIN ABRAMS,
MICHAEL FRANKO, MICHAEL AMATO, and THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY,
Defendants, No. 3:15-cv-00967 (MAD/DEP) (N.D.N.Y.)

Kenneth McConville died at the Montgomery County Jail from
cardiorespiratory arrest caused by a severe overdose of alcohol
and oxycodone after he was arrested by Thomas Malley, a Fort
Plains Police Officer.

Martha McConville, as Administratix of the Estate of Kenneth
McConville, brought an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983
and state law against Jeremy Montrym, Jennifer Young, Jennifer
Wintermute, Shawn Byrne, Jon Wemple, Kevin Abrams, Michael Franko,
Michael Amato, and the County of Montgomery on August 7, 2015.

Martha's complaint alleges that (1) defendants Montrym, Young,
Wintermute, Byrne, Wemple and Abrams were deliberately indifferent
to decedent's serious medical needs in violation of the Fourteenth
Amendment; (2) defendants Montgomery County, Franko and Amato
implemented municipal policies and practices that directly
violated decedent's constitutional rights, failed to implement
municipal policies to avoid constitutional deprivations and/or
failed to train and supervise employees in violation of the Eighth
Amendment and (3) defendants were negligent in failing to address
decedent's conscious pain and suffering in violation of state law.
Martha seeks punitive damages against Montrym, Young, Wintermute,
Byrne, Wemple, Abrams, Franko and Amato.

Defendants Wintermute, Wemple and Abrams moved to partially
dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(6) with respect to plaintiff's
first cause of action alleging violations of decedent's Fourteenth
Amendment rights due to defendants' deliberate indifference to
decedent's serious medical needs.

Judge D'Agostino denied defendants' partial motion to dismiss.

A copy of Judge D'Agostino's memorandum decision and order dated
June 9, 2016, is available at http://goo.gl/97FJBbfrom
Leagle.com.

Martha McConville, Plaintiff, represented by:

Elmer R. Keach, III, Esq.
Maria K. Dyson, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF ELMER ROBERT KEACH, III, P.C.
1 Pine West Plaza, Suite 109
Albany, NY 12205
Telephone: 518-434-1718
Facsimile: 518-770-1558

David R. Homer, represented by David R. Homer --
dhomer@carterconboy.com -- at Carter, Conboy Law Firm

Jeremy Montrym and Jennifer Young, Defendants/ Cross Defendants,
represented by Maria E. Lisi-Murray, New York State Attorney
General

Jennifer Wintermute, Jon Wemple, Kevin Abrams, Defendants,
represented by:

David L. Posner, Esq.
McCabe, Mack Law Firm
63 Washington St.
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Telephone: 845-486-6800

Shawn Byrne, Michael Franko, Michael Amato, and County of
Montgomery, Defendants/Cross Claimants, represented by Jonathan M.
Bernstein -- jbernstein@goldbergsegalla.com -- at Goldberg,
Segalla Law Firm


MORAL HOME: Faces "Guerrero" Suit Alleging Violation of FLSA
------------------------------------------------------------
PAULINA GUERRERO, v. MORAL HOME SERVICES, INC. and ARMANDO MORALES
ROSE, Case 1:16-cv-23051-FAM (S.D. Fla., July 14, 2016), seeks to
recover monetary damages, liquidated damages, interest, costs and
attorney's fees for willful violations of overtime and minimum
wage pay under the laws of the United States, the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Defendants own and operate a home healthcare company that utilizes
computers, software, medical equipment and supplies, furniture,
telephones, phone systems, and other materials and supplies to
engage in interstate commerce.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Yelina Angulo, Esq.
     ANGULO LAW FIRM, P.A.
     5207 NW 74 Avenue
     Miami, FL 33166
     Phone: 305-468-9564
     E-mail: service@angulolawfirm.com


NASSAU COUNTY, NY: Discovery Underway in "Weinstein" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case, MARC W. WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS C. KRUMPTER,
Acting Police Commissioner, Nassau County, New York, et al.,
Defendants, No. CV 14-7210 (ADS) (AKT), (E.D.N.Y.), Magistrate
Judge Kathleen Tomlinson ordered Defendants to respond, not later
than August 5, 2016, to the information sought in Plaintiff's
Request No. 16, to determine whether Defendants complied with the
prompt deprivation hearings as required by Judge Spatt's decision
in Razzano v. County of Nassau, 765 F. Supp. 2d. 176 (E.D.N.Y.
2011).

Plaintiff alleges Defendants' violations of his constitutional
rights under the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth
Amendments by forcing him to surrender his pistol license and
confiscating his legally owned firearms after Nassau County Police
Department (NCPD) officers responded to a domestic incident at his
home.

The Court said Plaintiff is entitled to some of the information
sought in Request No. 16 seeking Defendants to provide a list of
all firearms confiscations by NCPD which occurred as a result of a
domestic incident and pursuant to the County's procedure called,
Removal and Disposition of Weapons-Domestic Incidents/Threats to
Public Safety (OPS 10023), during the approximately 21-month time
period between May 11, 2012  --  the date OPS 10023 went into
effect  --  and February 25, 2014, the date of the incident. The
list include: (1) the date and location of the confiscation(s);
(2) an indication whether the firearms were returned and, if so,
the date of their return, and if not, the reasons they were not
returned; (3) the date, time and place of each post deprivation
hearing held after the confiscation(s); (4) the name and title of
the decision-maker who conducted the hearing, and (5) an
indication whether the decision after the hearing was reviewable
and, if so, by whom.

The Court is adjusting the Final Scheduling Order, as follows, to
account for the additional discovery to be completed in the
action:

     (1) August 15, 2016 will be the Deadline for completion of
all discovery;

     (2) On September 9, 2016, Moving party's Rule 56.1 Statement
of Undisputed Facts must be served;

     (3) Opposing party's Rule 56.1 Counterstatement must be
served by September 30, 2016;

     (4) Any letter request for a pre-motion conference to Judge
Spatt for purposes of making a summary judgment motion must be
filed by October 14, 2016;

     (5) Proposed Joint Pre-Trial Order must be filed on ECF by
December 16, 2016; and

     (6) Pre-Trial Conference will be held on December 21, 2016 at
2 p.m.

A copy of the court's order dated July 6, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/HSnzU1from Leagle.com.

Thomas C. Krumpter, et al., Defendants, represented by Ralph J.
Reissman -- rreissman@nassaucountyny.gov -- Nassau County
Attorney's Office


NITRO FLUIDS: Faces "Garcia" Suit Alleging Violation of FLSA
------------------------------------------------------------
MONICO GARCIA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. NITRO FLUIDS, LLC, BOBBY LEE KORICANEK and JACKIE R.
SIMPSON, JR. Case 2:16-cv-00288 (S.D. Tex., July 12, 2016), seeks
to recover compensation, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and
costs, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Nitro Fluids LLC is an oil field contractor and service located in
Nordheim, Texas.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Clif Alexander, Esq.
     Austin W. Anderson, Esq.
     Lauren E. Braddy, Esq.
     ANDERSON2X, PLLC
     819 N. Upper Broadway
     Corpus Christi, TX 78401
     Phone: (361) 452-1279
     Fax: (361) 452-1284
     E-mail: clif@a2xlaw.com
             austin@a2xlaw.com
             lauren@a2xlaw.com


NORTH AMERICAN BANCARD: Offer of Judgment Did Not Moot Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
Circuit Judge Danny J. Boggs of the United States Court of
Appeals, Sixth Circuit vacated the district court's judgment and
remanded the case of DIANA MEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH
AMERICAN BANCARD, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, No. 14-2574 (6th Cir.)

North American Bancard, LLC ("NAB"), a credit-card processing
company, used an automatic dialing system to make a marketing call
to Diana Mey's cell-phone number, in violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act of 1991.

Mey brought a federal action against NAB, individually and on
behalf of a proposed nationwide class of persons whom NAB had also
autodialed without permission. The district court denied without
prejudice Mey's motion for class certification, citing the need to
hold a scheduling conference.

NAB then made an offer of judgment to Mey, in which it agreed to
pay Mey's statutory damages and consented to her demand for
injunctive relief. NAB mailed Mey's attorney a cashier's check for
$4,500 for the 3 calls that NAB made to Mey.

When Mey rejected the offer, NAB moved the court to enter judgment
on her individual claims on the ground that the offer of judgment
mooted Mey's claims. The district court agreed, entered judgment
in favor of NAB on Mey's individual claims, and dismissed the
class claims. Mey appealed.

Judge Boggs vacated the district court's entry of judgment on
Mey's individual claims, vacated its order dismissing Mey's class
claims, and remanded the case to the district court.

A copy of Judge Boggs's opinion dated July 6, 2016, is available
at http://goo.gl/9XtRPkfrom Leagle.com.

The United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit panel consists
of Circuit Judges Danny J. Boggs and Karen Nelson Moore and
District Judge Reeves.


NY F&B: Magistrate Judge's Report Adopted, "Reyes" Suit Dismissed
-----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Laura Taylor Swain adopted Magistrate Judge
Freeman's Report dismissing Plaintiffs claims in the case, JOHNNY
DANIEL REYES et al., Plaintiffs, v. NY F&B SERVICES LLC et al.,
Defendants, No. 15CV2882-LTS-DCF (S.D.N.Y.).

The Court, upon review, finds no clear error in the Report that
recommends dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims for failure to attend a
conference set to discuss Plaintiffs' Counsel's intent to seek
withdrawal, failure to show at a subsequent order ordered by
Magistrate Judge Freeman, and failure to notify the court for
continuing the case, despite an order granting their Counsel's
withdrawal. Thus, with no further communications from the
Plaintiff, it being assumed as they opted to abandon their case, a
report on dismissal without prejudice was issued.

When reviewing a report and recommendation, the Court may accept,
reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate. The Court adopted the
Report in its entirety.

A copy of the Court's decision dated July 12, 2016, is available
at http://goo.gl/9snMHSfrom Leagle.com.


OMNI HEALTHCARE: Faces Mich. Lawsuit Alleging Violation of FLSA
---------------------------------------------------------------
KRYSTAL BRYANT, LAURA GONZALEZ, KAYLA MCTAGGERT, and KATIE
MACINNIS, v. OMNI HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT CORP., OMNI HOME CARE,
INC., OMNI HOME CARE OF OHIO, INC., SWARUP SAHA, and RESHMI SAHA
Jointly and Severally, 2:16-cv-12639-GAD-SDD (E.D. Mich., July 15,
2016), alleges that Defendants failed to pay their workers
overtime pay and made impermissible deductions from the pay of
salaried workers in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

OMNI HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT CORP. is a Medicare certified home
health agency that provides a wide range of nursing care and
therapy solutions, with services available year-round including
holidays.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     Bruce A. Miller, Esq.
     Richard G. Mack Jr Esq.
     Adam M. Taub, Esq.
     MILLER COHEN, P.L.C.
     600 W. Lafayette Blvd., 4th Floor
     Detroit, MI 48226
     Phone: (313) 964-4454
     Fax: (313) 964-4490
     E-mail: richardmack@millercohen.com
             adamtaub@millercohen.com


OPAI THAI: "De Los Santos" Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime Wages
-----------------------------------------------------------
Manuel Victorio De Los Santos, Marcos Bravo, Misael Genis Carillo,
and Sergio Oswaldo Calle, individually and on behalf of others
similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Opai Thai Inc. (d/b/a Opai
Thai), and Yan Bing Chen, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-05472
(S.D.N.Y., July 8, 2016), seeks unpaid minimum and overtime wages
pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the N.Y.
Labor Law, spread of hours and overtime wage orders of the New
York Commissioner of Labor, including applicable liquidated
damages, interest, attorneys fees and costs.

Defendants own, operate, and/or control a Thai restaurant located
at 722 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York 10025 under the name
Opai Thai. Plaintiffs were employed as cooks.

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Michael A. Faillace, Esq.
      MICHAEL FAILLACE & ASSOCIATES PC.
      60 East 42nd Street Suite 2540
      New York, NY 10165
      Telephone: (212) 317-1200
      Facsimile: (212) 317-1620
      Email: faillace@employmentcompliance.com


ORACLE CORP: Faces "Van Der Fluit" Suit Over Opower Acquisition
---------------------------------------------------------------
PETER VAN DER FLUIT, Individually and on Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated, v. DANIEL YATES, ALEX LASKEY, JON SAKODA, MARK
McLAUGHLIN, DIPCHAND NISHAR, GENE RIECHERS, MARCUS RYU, OC
ACQUISITION LLC, OLYMPUS II ACQUISITION CORPORATION and ORACLE
CORPORATION, Case No. 12553 (Del. Ch., July 12, 2016), seeks
damages arising from the Individual Defendants' alleged breaches
of fiduciary duties in connection with the negotiation and sale of
Opower, Inc. to Oracle Corp.

Oracle Corp. is a provider of enterprise software and computer
hardware products and services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Stuart A. Davidson, Esq.
     Christopher Martins, Esq.
     ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
     120 E. Palmetto Park Rd., Ste. 500
     Boca Raton, FL 33432
     Phone: (561) 750-3000

        - and -

     David T. Wissbroecker, Esq.
     Edward M. Gergosian, Esq.
     ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
     655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
     San Diego, CA 92101
     Phone: (619) 231-1058

        - and -

     Willie C. Briscoe, Esq.
     THE BRISCOE LAW FIRM, PLLC
     8150 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1575
     Dallas, TX 75206
     Phone: (214) 239-4568

        - and -

     Patrick W. Powers, Esq.
     Campbell Centre II, Esq.
     POWERS TAYLOR LLP
     8150 North Central Expressway, Suite 1575
     Dallas, TX 75206
     Phone: (214) 239-8900

        - and -

     Peter B. Andrews, Esq.
     Craig J. Springer, Esq.
     David M. Sborz, Esq.
     ANDREWS & SPRINGER LLC
     3801 Kennett Pike
     Building C, Suite 305
     Wilmington, DE 19807
     Phone: (302) 504-4957


ORTHOTICS ON THE GO: Faces "Harris" Sales Consultants' Lawsuit
--------------------------------------------------------------
EDWARD HARRIS, individually and on behalf of those similarly
situated, v. ORTHOTICS ON THE GO, INC., SUPPORTS FOR KANSAS, INC.,
and ARNOLD PEREIRA, individually and d/b/a GOOD FEET MIDWEST and
THE GOOD FEET STORE, Case 2:16-cv-00917 (E.D. Wis., July 13,
2016), was filed on behalf of all similarly situated current and
former, non-exempt Sales Consultants who worked for Defendants at
Defendants' stores located in Wisconsin and other states and who:
a) worked "off the clock;" and/or b) were not paid for all hours
worked; and/or c) were not paid overtime for hours worked in
excess of 40 hours in a workweek.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Larry A. Johnson, Esq.
     Summer Murshid, Esq.
     Timothy Maynard, Esq.
     HAWKS QUINDEL, S.C.
     222 East Erie, Suite 210
     P.O. Box 442
     Milwaukee, WI 53201-0442
     Phone: 414-271-8650
     Fax: 414-271-8442
     E-mail: ljohnson@hq-law.com
             smurshid@hq-law.com
             tmaynard@hq-law.com

        - and -

     Martin D. Holmes, Esq.
     DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC
     424 Church Street, Suite 1401
     Nashville, TN 37219
     Phone: 615-244-6538/615-620-1717
     Fax: 615-256-8386
     E-mail: mdholmes@dickinsonwright.com


PAYPAL INC: Final Settlement Approval Hearing Set for Dec. 14
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong granted the parties' stipulation to
set December 14, 2016, as the final approval hearing of the
settlement in the case, MOISES ZEPEDA, et al., on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.
PAYPAL, INC., et al., Defendants, Case No. 10-CV-02500 SBA (N.D.
Cal.).

The Final Approval Hearing may be postponed, adjourned, or
continued by order of the Court without further notice to the
Settlement Class.

The stipulation of the parties includes these deadlines pursuant
to the Scheduling Order: (1) August 15, 2016 for Paypal's
submission of a summary Email Notice to Additional Settlement
Class Members; (2) September 14, 2016 for the Settlement
Administrator to provide Supplemental summary Postcard Notice to
Additional Settlement Class Members; (3) October 14, 2016 for
Claim Forms to be submitted by Additional Settlement Class
Members; (4) October 14, 2016 for Additional Settlement Class
Members to exclude themselves from the Claims Class by mailing a
request for exclusion; (5) November 3, 2016 for Defendants to
exercise their right to terminate the Settlement Agreement; (6)
October 14, 2016 for Additional Settlement Class Members to object
to the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of the Settlement,
the request for an award of fees and costs to Class Counsel or the
awards to the Settlement Class representatives; (7) at least
thirty (30) days before the Final Approval Hearing for any
responses to objections to the Settlement Agreement and any papers
in support of the Settlement; and (8) No later than seven days
before the Final Approval Hearing for the Defendants or the
Settlement Administrator's declaration verifying that notice has
been provided to the Settlement Class.

A copy of the court's order dated July 6, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/gFKMsufrom Leagle.com.

Paypal, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benjamin Taylor Potter --
bpotter@stroock.com -- Stroock & David Wesley Moon, Stroock &
Stroock & Lavan LLP.

Paypal, Inc., Defendant, represented by Julia B. Strickland --
jstrickland@stroock.com -- Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP.

Perkins Tammy, Defendant, represented by Matt Kurilich --
mattkurilich@yahoo.com.


PENNSYLVANIA: Judge Approves Terms of Settlement in Autism Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson of the Middle District of
Pennsylvania approved the terms of the settlement in the case of
SONNY O., Jr., by his mother and Next Friend Maria G., DANIEL D.,
by his mother and Next Friend, Nadine D., and VALERIE H., by her
mother and Next Friend, Liliya H., Plaintiffs, v. THEODORE DALLAS,
in his official capacity as Secretary of Human Services of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Defendant, Civil No. 1:14-CV-1110
(M.D. Pa.)

Plaintiffs brought a class action on behalf of 40,000
Pennsylvanians, families enrolled in Pennsylvania's medical
assistance program whose children suffered from autism spectrum
disorders. On behalf of the class of children, whose voices were
stilled or impaired by autism, the plaintiffs sued the Department
of Human Services, alleging that the failure to provide medically
necessary Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) therapy to the
children in an amount, duration and scope sufficient to treat
their disorders violated Title XIX of the Social Security Act.

The parties tendered to the court for its consideration a proposed
class action settlement agreement, which Judge Carlson approved.

The proposed settlement provided at least eight significant
benefits for class members.  First, under the terms of the
settlement agreement, the Commonwealth created a designation for
ABA services, permitting families to request, and providers to
bill for these services through the Medical Assistance program.

Second, the agreement called for the issuance of a bulletin
providing information to the affected autism spectrum disorder
community, and various providers, regarding ABA therapy and its
potential benefit in treating these disorders.

Third, the settlement agreement put in place a process for the
revision of medical necessity guidelines in this field, in order
to ensure that these guidelines do not impede access to these
services but rather open the door to greater access to ABA therapy
for families confronting autism.

Fourth, the settlement agreement established procedures for
ensuring that those who provide ABA services possess sufficient
skill, training, background and experience to meaningfully apply
ABA therapy to the needs of the autism spectrum disorder
community.

Fifth, the agreement prescribed enrollment procedures for ABA
service providers, procedures which facilitate enrollment in the
Medical Assistance program.

Sixth, the agreement called for on-going assessments of the
ability of provider networks to meet the needs of the autism
spectrum disorder community, and deliver meaningful ABA therapy to
that community. This is a critical component of the settlement,
and one which ensures that the commitments set forth in the
agreement are able to be translated into action in the field.

Seventh, the proposed settlement agreement created open, on-going,
and transparent pathways for communication regarding progress and
challenges in implementing this settlement. This communication is
ensured through bi-monthly meetings by the parties designed to
monitor the implementation of the program. In addition, under the
terms of the agreement the Department of Human Services will
create a dedicated point-person whose role it will be to address
concerns of those seeking medical assistance for their autistic
children.

Finally, the agreement provides for a useful oversight role by the
court in this continuing process, and enables the parties to turn
to the court to address and resolve any disputes which may arise
relating to the implementation of this agreement.

A copy of Magistrate Judge Carlson's memorandum opinion dated June
9, 2016, is available at http://goo.gl/bfieeBfrom Leagle.com.

Plaintiffs, represented by:

Koert A Wehberg, Esq.
Rachel B. Mann, Esq.
Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania
1315 Walnut St #4
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Telephone: 215-238-8070
Beverly Mackereth, Defendant, represented by Jessica S. Davis at
Office of Attorney General


PFIZER INC: Faces "Graner" Suit in Cal. Over Labeling of Viagra
---------------------------------------------------------------
Neil J. Graner v. Pfizer Inc., Case 3:16-cv-04004 (N.D. Cal., July
15, 2016), alleges negligent and wrongful conduct in connection
with the design, development, manufacturing, testing, packaging,
promoting, marking, distribution, labeling and/or sale of
sildenafil citrate tablets sold under the brand name Viagra.

Pfizer Inc. offers pharmaceutical, health care, animal health, and
confectionery products.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Kimberly D. Barone Baden, Esq
     Ann E. Rice Ervin, Esq.
     MOTLEY RICE LLP
     28 Bridgeside Boulevard
     Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
     Phone: (843) 216-9265
     Fax: (843) 216-9450
     E-mail: kbarone@motleyrice.com
             ariceervin@motleyrice.com


PINEWOOD HEALTH: "Pippen" Suit Moved from Cir. Ct. to W.D. Ark.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Delois Pippen, Special Administratrix of the Estate of Lucille G.
Billings, deceased, and on behalf of the wrongful death
beneficiaries of Lucille G. Billings; and on Behalf of All other
Similarly Situated, the Plaintiff, v. Pinewood Health and
Rehabilitation, LLC; Arkansas SNF Operations Acquisition, LLC;
Arkansas Nursing Home Acquisition, LLC; CSCV Holdings, LLC;
Capital Funding Group, Inc.; SLC Professionals, LLC; SLC
Professionals AR7, LLC; SLC Professionals Holdings, LLC; SLC
Operations Holdings, LLC; SLC Operations, LLC; SLC Administrative
Services of Arkansas, LLC; Senior Living Communities of Arkansas,
LLC; Addit, LLC; SLC Operations Master Tenant, LLC; SLC
Properties, LLC; 1101 Waterwell Road, LLC; Alan Zuccari;
Brian Reynolds; John W. Dwyer; Daniel Baird; Troy Morris, in his
capacity as Administrator of Pinewood Health and Rehabilitation,
LLC; Emily Greene, in her capacity as Administrator of Pinewood
Health and Rehabilitation, LLC; Carol Hoelscher, in her capacity
as Administrator of Pinewood Health and Rehabilitation, LLC;
Barney L. Pierce, in his capacity as Administrator of Pinewood
Health and Rehabilitation, LLC, Case No. CV-16-022-4, was removed
from the Ashley County Circuit, to the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Arkansas (El Dorado). The Western District
Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-01069-SOH to the proceeding.
The assigned Judge is Hon. Susan O. Hickey.

Pinewood Health is a licensed care provider with the State of
Arkansas.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Matthew David Swindle, Esq.
          REDDICK MOSS PLLC
          One Information Way, Suite 201
          Little Rock, AR 72202
          Telephone: (501) 907 7790
          Facsimile: (501) 907 7793
          E-mail: matthew@reddickmoss.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Dale W. Brown II, Esq.
          Andrew King, Esq.
          Jeff Fletcher, Esq.
          KUTAK ROCK LLP
          234 E. Millsap Road, Suite 200
          Fayetteville, AR 72703
          Telephone: (479) 973 4200
          Facsimile: (479) 973 0007
          E-mail: dale.brown@kutakrock.com
                  Andrew.King@KutakRock.com
                  jeff.fletcher@kutakrock.com


PLASTER & WALD: Faces "Benson" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
----------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Benson, on behalf of himself and all other similarly
situated individuals, v. Plaster & Wald Consulting Corp., Case
5:16-cv-00801-R (W.D. Okla., July 14, 2016), seeks to recover
overtime compensation under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act.

Defendant is an oil and gas services company providing planning,
consulting, engineering, and management personnel to the oil and
gas industry.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Leah Roper, Esq.
     Mark Hammon, Esq.
     HAMMONS, GOWENS, HURST & ASSOCIATES
     325 Dean A. McGee Ave
     Oklahoma City, OK 73102
     Phone: (405) 235-6100
     Fax: (405) 235-6111
     E-mail: leah@hammonslaw.com
             mark@hammonslaw.com

        - and -

     Paul J. Lukas, Esq.
     Alexander M. Baggio, Esq.
     NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP
     4600 IDS Center
     80 South 8th Street
     Minneapolis, MN 55402
     Phone: (612) 256-3200
     E-mail: lukas@nka.com
             abaggio@nka.com


PLOY DEE: Court Wanted Settlement Agreement Revised
---------------------------------------------------
In the case, Manuel Montiel Lopez, Plaintiff, v. Ploy Dee, Inc.,
et al., Defendants, No. 15-cv-647 (AJN), (S.D.NY.), District Judge
Alison J. Nathan ordered the parties to submit revised settlement
agreement by July 20, 2016 after the court declined to approve the
revised settlement proposal submitted by the parties on May 17,
2016.

The case alleges violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
and New York Labor Law.

The submitted revised settlement proposal provides the following
disputed provisions: (1) that plaintiff "will not directly or
indirectly encourage, induce, solicit or assist anyone to file a
wage and hour action or collective or class action against"
defendants and (2) that plaintiff releases defendants from a
number of enumerated claims arising from the employment
relationship, including on-the-job injuries and discrimination
claims.

Accordingly, the court found that the parties must either remove
the language of the first disputed provision, narrow it, or submit
argument and authority why it is fair and reasonable and to assure
that plaintiff is settling his FLSA claims in a manner that
comports with the requirements of the "Cheeks" case, captioned,
Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir.
2015).

A copy of the court's order dated June 29, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/l96mZnfrom Leagle.com.

Ploy Dee Inc., et al., doing business as Wondee Siam V, Defendant,
represented by David Seth Halsband -- dhalsband@optonline.net --
Halsband Law Offices.


PNC BANK: "Cruz" Sues Over Share Price Drop
-------------------------------------------
Dr. Rafael M. Cruz, Dr. Gloria Cruz, Dr. Rafael F. Cruz, v. PNC
Bank, National Association and The PNC Financial Services Group,
Inc., Defendants, Case No. 3:16-cv-00292 (S.D. Ohio. July 8,
2016), seeks compensatory damages, recovery of the full amount
paid for the unregistered securities by the Plaintiffs, incentive
payment and such other and further relief resulting from the
illegal sale of unregistered securities.

PNC allegedly allowed its facilities to be used in the sale of the
promissory notes and membership unit certificates involved in a
Ponzi-scheme.

PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is a Pennsylvania financial
services corporation with its headquarters located at 249 Fifth
Avenue, One PNC Plaza, Pittsburgh, PA 15222. PNC Bank, National
Association is the principal subsidiary of PNC Financial and
offers consumer and corporate services in over 2,500 branches in
19 states and Washington, D.C.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Toby K. Henderson, Esq.
     Matthew G. Bruce, Esq.
     SEBALY SHILLITO + DYER
     1900 Kettering Tower
     40 North Main Street
     Dayton, OH 45423
     Tel: 937/222-2500
     Fax: 937/222-6554
     Email: thenderson@ssdlaw.com

            - and -

     Gary A. Gotto, Esq.
     KELLER ROHRBACK, PLC
     3101 North Central Avenue, Suite 1400
     Phoenix, AZ 85012
     Tel: 602/248-0088
     Fax: 602/248-2822
     Email: ggotto@kellerrohrback.com


PREMIER HOME: "Blagodar" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
-----------------------------------------------------
Olena Blagodar, on behalf of herself and all other similarly
situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. Premier Home Health Care
Services, Inc. and John Does 1-25 Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-
03820 (E.D.N.Y., July 8, 2016), seeks to recover overtime pay and
redress for Defendants' failure to furnish accurate wage
statements as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New
York Labor Law.

Premier Home Health Care Services, Inc. is a domestic corporation
operating in the home healthcare industry in the City of White
Plains and State of New York, County of Westchester where
Plaintiff was employed by Defendants as a home health aide worker.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Alan J. Sasson, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF ALAN J. SASSON, P.C.
     2687 Coney Island Avenue, 2nd Floor
     Brooklyn, NY 11235
     Tel: (718) 339-0856


QUAKER OATS: "Cooper" Suit Over Labeling Transferred to N.D. Ill.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs and Defendants in DANIELLE S. COOPER, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated, v. THE QUAKER OATS
COMPANY, CASE NO. 3:16-cv-02364 (N.D. Cal.) have stipulated and
agreed on July 12, 2016, that the action should be transferred to
the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois for coordination with two similar actions captioned:

     (i) "Gibson v. The Quaker Oats Company, No. 1:16-cv-04853
        (N.D. Ill.)" and

    (ii) Wheeler v. The Quaker Oats Company, No. 1:16-cv-05776
       (N.D. Ill.),

currently proceeding before Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr.

All cases allege that certain "100% Natural Whole Grain" labeling
for certain Quaker Oat products is misleading due to the alleged
presence of trace amounts of glyphosate.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Andrew S. Tulumello, Esq.
     GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
     1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
     Washington, DC 11101
     Phone: 202.955.8500
     Fax: 202.467.0539
     E-mail: atulumello@gibsondunn.com


QLIK TECHNOLOGIES: Board Faces "Charles" Suit Over Sale to Thoma
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRENT CHARLES, on behalf of himself and all other similarly
situated stockholders of Qlik Technologies Inc., v. BRUCE GOLDEN,
LARS BJORK, JOHN GAVIN JR., DEBORAH HOPKINS, ALEX OTT, STEFFAN
TOMLINSON AND PAUL WAHL, Case No. 12552- (Del. Ch., July 12,
2016), alleges breach of fiduciary duties by the board of
directors of Qlik Technologies Inc. when they agreed to sell the
Company to Thoma Bravo LLC.

Non-party Qlik Technologies Inc. sells software for self-service
data visualization, guided analytics applications, embedded
analytics and reporting to approximately 35,000 customers
worldwide.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Peter B. Andrews, Esq.
     Craig J. Springer, Esq.
     David Sborz, Esq.
     ANDREWS & SPRINGER LLC
     3801 Kennett Pike
     Building C, Suite 305
     Wilmington, DE 19807
     Phone: (302) 504-4957


QLIK TECHNOLOGIES: Jeweltex Sues to Stop Sale to Thoma Bravo
------------------------------------------------------------
JEWELTEX MANUFACTURING INC. RETIREMENT PLAN, NICLAS LUNDGREN,
THOMAS LUNDGREN, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly
Situated, v. QLIK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., BRUCE GOLDEN, LARS BJ™RK,
JOHN GAVIN, JR., DEBORAH HOPKINS, ALEX OTT, STEFFAN TOMLINSON and
PAUL WAHL, Case 2:16-cv-03800-GJP (E.D. Pa., July 13, 2016),
alleges violations of the Securities Exchange Act and seeks to
enjoin the vote for the acquisition of Qlik Technologies, Inc. by
Thoma Bravo, LLC.

Qlik Technologies, Inc. is into visual analytics, delivering
solutions for self-service data visualization and guided
analytics.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     EVAN J. Smith, Esq.
     Marc L. Ackerman, Esq.
     BRODSKY & SMITH, LLC
     Two Bala Plaza, Suite 602
     Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
     Phone: (610) 667-6200
     Fax: (610) 667-9029

        - and -

     Richard A. Acocelli, Esq.
     Michael A. Rogovin, Esq.
     Kelly C. Keenan, Esq.
     WEISSLAW LLP
     1500 Broadway, 16th Floor
     New York, NY 10036
     Phone: (212) 682-3025
     Fax: (212) 682-3010

        - and -

     Gustavo F. Bruckner, Esq.
     POMERANTZ LLP
     600 Third Avenue,
     New York, NY 10016
     Phone: 212 661 1100
     Fax: 917 463 1044


RA MULLIN: "Graley" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
------------------------------------------------
George Graley v. R.A. Mullin Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Mullin Bros.
Painting & Construction Services, Defendant, Case No. RG16809671
(N.D. Ohio, July 8, 2016), seeks overtime compensation for
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio Minimum
Fair Wage Standards Act.

Mullin Bros is a painting and construction company where Graley
was employed as a painter.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Anthony J. Lazzaro, Esq.
     Chastity L. Christy, Esq.
     Lori M. Griffin, Esq.
     THE LAZZARO LAW FIRM, LLC
     920 Rockefeller Building
     614 W. Superior Avenue
     Cleveland, OH 44113
     Phone: 216-696-5000
     Facsimile: 216-696-7005
     Email: anthony@lazzarolawfirm.com
            chastity@lazzarolawfirm.com
            lori@lazzarolawfirm.com


ROSA MEXICANO: "Suarez" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
----------------------------------------------------
Edwin Suarez, Carlos Rivas, Ester Jiron, And Driss Sene,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, v. Rosa Mexicano Brands Inc., West 62 Operating LLC,
Rosa Mexicano Usq LLC, Fenix Rest. Inc., Rosa Mexicano Murray LLC,
Rosa Mexicano Boston, LLC, Rosa Mexicano Riverside LLC, Rosa
Mexicano Dc LLC, Rosa Mexicano Chevy Chase Maryland LLC, Rosa
Mexicano National Harbor LLC, Rosa Mexicano Atlanta LLC, Rosa
Mexicano Miami LLC, And Rosa Mexicano South Beach LLC, Defendant,
Case No. 1:16-cv-05464 (S.D.N.Y., July 8, 2016), seeks to recover
minimum wages, overtime pay, call-in pay and other wages under the
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and New York Labor Laws.

Rosa Mexicano Brands, Inc. owns and operates the Rosa Mexicano
chain throughout the United States and abroad.

Suarez, Rivas and Juron were employed by Defendants as bussers,
servers and food runners at the Lincoln Center Rosa Mexicano.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Joseph A. Fitapelli, Esq.
     Brian S. Schaffer, Esq.
     Armando A. Ortiz, Esq.
     FITAPELLI & SCHAFFER, LLP
     28 Liberty Street, 30th Floor
     New York, NY 10005
     Telephone: (212) 300-0375


SACRAMENTO, CA: Faces "Mal Pratap" Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
----------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against County of Sacramento. The case is
captioned Mal Pratap, the Plaintiff, v. County of Sacramento, the
Defendant, Case No. 34-2016-00197387-CU-CR-GDS (Cal. Super. Ct.,
July 18, 2016).

Sacramento County is a county in the U.S. state of California. As
of the 2010 census, the population was 1,418,788.


SAFEWAY INC: Calif. Court Okays Removal of "Prewitt" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case, REBEKAH PREWITT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAFEWAY INC.,
Defendant, Case No. 16-cv-02753-MMC (N.D. Calif.), District Judge
Maxine M. Chesney found that the Defendant had met its burden to
show that the removal of the action was proper under the Class
Action Fairness Act (CAFA).

Defendant has submitted sufficient evidence to support (1) a
finding that the amount in controversy exceeds the statutory
threshold of $5,000,000, and (2) an inference that at least one,
and most likely considerably more than one, member of plaintiffs'
proposed class was, at the time of removal, a citizen of a state
other than California, the state of which Safeway is a citizen.
Plaintiff has not submitted evidence to counter and depose
Defendant's declarant.

Following the decision, the Court ordered the following:

     (1) denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand;

     (2) denying Defendant's Motion to Stay;

     (3) denying Defendant's Motion to Enlarge Time; and

     (4) denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Response
         to Sur-reply and Take Deposition of Michael Redgrave.

A copy of the Court's order dated July 11, 2016, is available at
http://goo.gl/Hta4QNfrom Leagle.com.

Safeway Inc., Defendant, represented by Layne Hamilton Melzer --
LMelzer@rutan.com -- Rutan & Tucker, LLP, Trenton Herbert Norris
-- trent.norris@aporter.com -- Arnold & Porter LLP, Ginamarie C.
Caya -- ginamarie.caya@aporter.com -- Arnold and Porter LLP,
Joshua Aaron Glikin -- glikin@bowie-jensen.com -- Bowie and
Jensen, LLC & Proud Usahacharoenporn -- pusaha@rutan.com -- Rutan
and Tucker LLP.


SEECO INC: Class Counsels Triumph Over Class Representative
-----------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Kristine G. Baker of the Eastern District of
Arkansas, Eastern Division, granted the defendants' motion to
dismiss the case STEPHANIE DEVAZIER, as class representative in
Sara Stewmon vs. SEECO, Inc., Desoto Gathering Company, LLC and
Southwestern Midstream, Plaintiff, v. BEN H. CARUTH, et al.,
Defendants, Case No. 2:16-cv-00067-KGB (E.D. Ark.)

Plaintiff Stephanie Devazier is the appointed class representative
of a state class action entitled SEECO, Inc. v. Stewmon, CV-15-
198, that is pending before the Arkansas Supreme Court.

Defendants are counsel for both the plaintiff (Smith Class
Counsel) and defendants (Smith Defense Counsel) in Smith v. SEECO,
Inc., et al., 4:14-cv-435, a federal class action that is
currently pending before the Honorable Brian S. Miller of the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

On April 11, 2016, Judge Miller entered an order granting Smith
class counsel's second motion for class certification and directed
Smith class counsel to submit a proposed class notice plan within
30 days.

Ms. Devazier seeks to enjoin Smith class counsel and Smith defense
counsel from communicating directly with any members of the class
she purportedly represents, including through court-approved class
notice, which is required under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. Ms. Devazier also requested that the court order
that any communication involving any of the Stewmon class be sent
only to their duly appointed class counsel, E. Dion Wilson, B.
Michael Easley and Timothy R. Holton, or in the alternative, with
the express consent of their appointed counsel.

Before the Court are Ms. Devazier's emergency motion for
preliminary injunction, Smith class counsel's motion to dismiss,
Smith defense counsel's motion to dismiss for lack of standing and
failure to state a claim, Smith defense counsel's renewed motion
to dismiss for lack of standing and failure to state a claim, and
Smith class counsel's renewed motion to dismiss.

Judge Baker granted Smith defense counsel's renewed motion to
dismiss for lack of standing and failure to state a claim and
Smith class counsel's renewed motion to dismiss for lack of
standing and failure to state a claim.

A copy of Judge Baker's amended opinion and order dated July 15,
2016, is available at http://goo.gl/AolkkRfrom Leagle.com.

Stephanie Devazier, Plaintiff, represented by:

B. Michael Easley, Esq.
Austin H. Easley, Esq.
Easley & Houseal, PLLC
510 E. Cross Street
Forrest City, AR 72335
Telephone: 870-330-0015

     - and -

Elliott Dion Wilson, Esq.
Wilson Law Firm
423 Rightor Street
Helena, AR 72342
Telephone: 870-338-6487
Facsimile: 870-338-8030

     - and -

Timothy R. Holton, Esq.
Deal Cooper Holton PLLC
296 Washington Ave.
Memphis, TN 38103
Telephone: 901-523-2222

Andrew King, Defendant, Pro se

Andrew King, Defendant, represented by Frederick Hart Davis --
Frederick.Davis@KutakRock.com -- Jess L. Askew, III --
Jess.Askew@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP; Marc S. Tabolsky at
Schiffer Odom Hicks & Johnson PLLC; Matthew K. Hansen --
mkhansen@lockelord.com -- Michael Vance Powell --
mpowell@lockelord.com -- at Locke Lord LLP; R. Paul Yetter --
pyetter@yettercoleman.com -- Robert K. Ellis --
rellis@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP; Rex M. Terry
-- terry@hardinlaw.com -- at Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC; Thomas
A. Daily -- tdaily@dailywoods.com -- at Daily & Woods, L.L.C.

Frederick Hart Davis, Defendant, represented by Andrew King --
Andrew.King@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP

Frederick Hart Davis, Defendant, Pro se; Jess L. Askew, III --
Jess.Askew@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP; Marc S. Tabolsky at
Schiffer Odom Hicks & Johnson PLLC; Matthew K. Hansen --
mkhansen@lockelord.com -- Michael Vance Powell --
mpowell@lockelord.com -- at Locke Lord LLP; R. Paul Yetter --
pyetter@yettercoleman.com -- Robert K. Ellis --
rellis@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP; Rex M. Terry
-- terry@hardinlaw.com -- at Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC; Thomas
A. Daily -- tdaily@dailywoods.com -- at Daily & Woods, L.L.C.

Jess L Askew, III, Defendant, represented by Andrew King --
Andrew.King@KutakRock.com -- Frederick Hart Davis --
Frederick.Davis@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP

Jess L Askew, III, Defendant, Pro se; Marc S. Tabolsky at Schiffer
Odom Hicks & Johnson PLLC; Matthew K. Hansen --
mkhansen@lockelord.com -- Michael Vance Powell --
mpowell@lockelord.com -- at Locke Lord LLP; R. Paul Yetter --
pyetter@yettercoleman.com -- Robert K. Ellis --
rellis@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP; Rex M. Terry
-- terry@hardinlaw.com -- at Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC; Thomas
A. Daily -- tdaily@dailywoods.com -- at Daily & Woods, L.L.C.

Michael Vance Powell, Defendant, represented by Andrew King --
Andrew.King@KutakRock.com -- Frederick Hart Davis --
Frederick.Davis@KutakRock.com -- Jess L. Askew, III--
Jess.Askew@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP; Marc S. Tabolsky at
Schiffer Odom Hicks & Johnson PLLC; Matthew K. Hansen --
mkhansen@lockelord.com -- Michael Vance Powell --
mpowell@lockelord.com -- at Locke Lord LLP

Michael Vance Powell, Defendant, Pro se; R. Paul Yetter --
pyetter@yettercoleman.com -- Robert K. Ellis --
rellis@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP; Rex M. Terry
-- terry@hardinlaw.com -- at Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC; Thomas
A. Daily -- tdaily@dailywoods.com -- at Daily & Woods, L.L.C.

Marc Tabolsky, Defendant, represented by Andrew King --
Andrew.King@KutakRock.com -- Frederick Hart Davis --
Frederick.Davis@KutakRock.com -- Jess L. Askew, III--
Jess.Askew@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP; Marc S. Tabolsky at
Schiffer Odom Hicks & Johnson PLLC; Matthew K. Hansen --
mkhansen@lockelord.com -- Michael Vance Powell --
mpowell@lockelord.com -- at Locke Lord LLP; R. Paul Yetter --
pyetter@yettercoleman.com -- Robert K. Ellis --
rellis@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP; Rex M. Terry
-- terry@hardinlaw.com -- at Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC; Thomas
A. Daily -- tdaily@dailywoods.com -- at Daily & Woods, L.L.C.

Robert K Ellis, Defendant, represented by Andrew King --
Andrew.King@KutakRock.com -- Frederick Hart Davis --
Frederick.Davis@KutakRock.com -- Jess L. Askew, III--
Jess.Askew@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP; Marc S. Tabolsky at
Schiffer Odom Hicks & Johnson PLLC; Matthew K. Hansen --
mkhansen@lockelord.com -- Michael Vance Powell --
mpowell@lockelord.com -- at Locke Lord LLP; R. Paul Yetter --
pyetter@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP; Rex M. Terry -
- terry@hardinlaw.com -- at Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC

Robert K Ellis, Defendant, Pro se; Thomas A. Daily --
tdaily@dailywoods.com -- at Daily & Woods, L.L.C.

Matthew K Hansen, Defendant, represented by Andrew King --
Andrew.King@KutakRock.com -- Frederick Hart Davis --
Frederick.Davis@KutakRock.com -- Jess L. Askew, III--
Jess.Askew@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP; Marc S. Tabolsky at
Schiffer Odom Hicks & Johnson PLLC

Matthew K Hansen, Defendant, Pro se; Michael Vance Powell --
mpowell@lockelord.com -- at Locke Lord LLP; R. Paul Yetter --
pyetter@yettercoleman.com -- Robert K. Ellis --
rellis@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP; Rex M. Terry
-- terry@hardinlaw.com -- at Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC; Thomas
A. Daily -- tdaily@dailywoods.com -- at Daily & Woods, L.L.C.

Rex M Terry, Defendant, represented by Andrew King --
Andrew.King@KutakRock.com -- Frederick Hart Davis --
Frederick.Davis@KutakRock.com -- Jess L. Askew, III--
Jess.Askew@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP; Marc S. Tabolsky at
Schiffer Odom Hicks & Johnson PLLC; Michael Vance Powell --
mpowell@lockelord.com -- at Locke Lord LLP; R. Paul Yetter --
pyetter@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP

Rex M Terry, Defendant, Pro se; Robert K. Ellis --
rellis@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP; Thomas A. Daily
-- tdaily@dailywoods.com -- at Daily & Woods, L.L.C

R Paul Yetter, Defendant, represented by Andrew King --
Andrew.King@KutakRock.com -- Frederick Hart Davis --
Frederick.Davis@KutakRock.com -- Jess L. Askew, III--
Jess.Askew@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP; Marc S. Tabolsky at
Schiffer Odom Hicks & Johnson PLLC; Matthew K. Hansen --
mkhansen@lockelord.com -- Michael Vance Powell --
mpowell@lockelord.com -- at Locke Lord LLP

R Paul Yetter, Defendant, Pro se; Rex M. Terry --
terry@hardinlaw.com -- at Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC; Robert K.
Ellis -- rellis@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP; Thomas
A. Daily -- tdaily@dailywoods.com -- at Daily & Woods, L.L.C

Thomas A Dailey, Defendant, represented by Andrew King --
Andrew.King@KutakRock.com -- Frederick Hart Davis --
Frederick.Davis@KutakRock.com -- Jess L. Askew, III--
Jess.Askew@KutakRock.com -- at Kutak Rock LLP; Matthew K. Hansen -
- mkhansen@lockelord.com -- Michael Vance
Powellmpowell@lockelord.com -- at Locke Lord LLP; Paul Yetter --
pyetter@yettercoleman.com -- Robert K. Ellis --
rellis@yettercoleman.com -- at Yetter Coleman LLP; Rex M. Terry
-- terry@hardinlaw.com -- at Hardin, Jesson & Terry


SEVENTH GENERATION: Parties Agree to Stay "Tsan" Suit
-----------------------------------------------------
In the case, MAGGIE TSAN and ERICA WILDSTEIN, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.
SEVENTH GENERATION, INC., Defendant, Case No. 3:15-CV-00205-JST
(N.D. Cal.), District Judge Jon S. Tigar approved a stipulation
providing for the temporary stay of the case management schedule
and the filing on or before September 30, 2016, of a notice of
voluntarily dismissal, or alternatively, a joint status report on
the status of the administration of the parties' settlement.

On July 1, 2016, the Parties filed a Settlement Agreement and
Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for
Preliminary Approval of Settlement, Preliminary Certification of
Settlement Class, And Approval of Notice Plan in the Southern
District of New York, 7:14-CV-09087-KMK, where a similar action is
pending.

A copy of the Court-approved Stipulation dated July 6, 2016, is
available at http://goo.gl/vHgyZCfrom Leagle.com.

Seventh Generation, Inc., Defendant, represented by Daniel J.
Herling -- djherling@mintz.com -- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky
& Popeo P.C., Michelle Gillette -- mgillette@crowell.com --
Crowell & Moring LLP, Joshua Thomas Foust -- jtfoust@mintz.com --
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC & Mina Nasseri --
mnasseriasghar@crowell.com -- Crowell & Moring LLP.


SHARP ELECTRONICS: 3rd Cir. Appeal Filed in "Popejoy" Class Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs Jason Popejoy, Joe Sawyer and Daniel Sullivan filed an
appeal from a court ruling in their lawsuit entitled Jason
Popejoy, et al. v. Sharp Electronics Corp., Case No. 2-14-cv-
06426, in the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey.

The appellate case is captioned as Jason Popejoy, et al. v. Sharp
Electronics Corp., Case No. 16-3114, in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit.

District Judge William J. Martini of the District of New Jersey
granted defendant's motion to dismiss in the case JASON POPEJOY,
JOE SAWYER, and DANIEL SULLIVAN, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SHARP ELECTRONICS
CORPORATION, Defendant, Civ. No. 2:14-06426 (WJM) (D.N.J.)

In October 2014, plaintiffs Jason Popejoy, Joe Sawyer, and Daniel
Sullivan filed a putative class action against Sharp Electronics
Corporation and alleged that Sharp engaged in a massive consumer
fraud by falsely marketing, advertising, and deceptively labeling
certain of its televisions as LED TVs, LED HDTVs, or LED
televisions. Each named plaintiff alleged that they relied upon
Sharp's marketing assertions on the cartons containing the
televisions that each was an actual LED TV in selecting the model.

The court dismissed plaintiffs' complaint without prejudice,
finding that a reasonable consumer could not be deceived by
Sharp's marketing assertions on the carton containing the
television because the cartons stated that the product was both an
LED TV and a Liquid Crystal Television.

In their first amended complaint, plaintiffs eschew reliance on
the representations made on the box cartons and focus instead on
Sharp's marketing materials.  They alleged that each named
plaintiff selected Sharp's LED TV model because of marketing
assertions made directly or facilitated and encouraged by Sharp,
on the internet and/or at the point of sale, that the television
was an LED TV. On information and belief, the point of sale
materials, plaintiff viewed at the time of purchase were prepared
based on false and misleading information provided to the reseller
by Sharp, which Sharp intended the reseller to rely upon in
preparing point of sale marketing materials and which Sharp
intended the customer to rely upon in making the purchase
decision.

Sharp filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(6) or, alternatively, to strike the nationwide
class allegations from, the first amended complaint.

Judge Martini granted defendant's motion to dismiss and dismissed
the complaint and denied its motion to strike as moot.

A copy of Judge Martini's opinion dated June 9, 2016, is available
at http://goo.gl/5OALzmfrom Leagle.com.

Plaintiffs, represented by SCOTT A. GEORGE --
sgeorge@seegerweiss.com -- at SEEGER WEISS, LLP

SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Defendant, represented by KEVIN
HARRY MARINO -- kmarino@khmarino.com -- JOHN D. TORTORELLA --
jtortorella@khmarino.com -- at MARINO TORTORELLA & BOYLE, PC


SINGING RIVER: Claims in "Montgomery" Suit Narrowed
---------------------------------------------------
The case, DOLLY ANN MONTGOMERY, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SINGING RIVER HEALTH
SYSTEM FOUNDATION, et al., Defendants, Case No. 1:16CV17-LG-RHW
(S. D. Miss.), is dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to the
injunction entered in another case, Jones v. Singing River Health
System, et al., 1:14cv447-LG-RHW.

Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. penned the decisions in
"Jones" and "Montgomery" actions.

Both cases allege underfunding of the Singing River Health System
Employees' Retirement Plan and Trust.

The injunction issued in the "Jones" suit bars all claims, rights
and causes of action, damages, losses, liabilities and demands
that could have been or might in the future be asserted against
Defendants related to the failure to fund the Trust and/or
management or administration of the Plan. In effect, the court
dismissed all the claims in the "Montgomery" lawsuit which was
stayed prior to the determination of the "Jones" lawsuit.

Montgomery's claims against KPMG, LLP, and Transamerica Retirement
Solutions Corporation are not affected by the injunction and will
remain pending.

A copy of the court's order dated July 6, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/HiLyaffrom Leagle.com.


SONOMA COUNTY: Settlement Approval Hearing Moved to Oct. 4
----------------------------------------------------------
In the case, SONOMA COUNTY ASS'N OF RETIRED EMPLOYEES, Plaintiff,
v. SONOMA COUNTY, Defendant, No. C 09-4432-CW (N.D. Calif.),
District Judge Claudia Wilken granted the parties' Request for
Continuance of the Hearing Date for Preliminary Approval of a
Class Action Settlement on October 4, 2016 from its initial
schedule set for August 2, 2016.

Along with the request, the parties also filed before the court, a
Joint Case Management Statement and a Report on Settlement Status.
A copy of the Court's Order dated July 18, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/UxUOvJfrom Leagle.com.

Sonoma County, Defendant, represented by Raymond Francis Lynch --
rlynch@hansonbridgett.com -- Hanson Bridgett Marcus Vlahos & Rudy
LLP, Batya Floryn Forsyth -- bforsyth@hansonbridgett.com --
Attorney at Law, Matthew Joseph Peck, Hanson Bridgett LLP, Robert
Blum --  Rblum@hansonbridgett.com -- Hanson Bridgett Marcus Vlahos
& Rudy LLP & Stephen B. Peck, Esq., -- speck@hansonbridgett.com --
Hanson Bridgett LLP.


STARBUCKS CORP: Bid to Stay "Strumlauf" Suit Granted in Part
------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Thelton E. Henderson of the Northern District of
California granted in part and denied in part defendant's motion
to stay in the case SIERA STRUMLAUF, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant, Case No. 16-cv-01306-THE (N.D.
Cal.)

Plaintiffs filed a class action against Starbucks Corporation
alleging that Starbucks uniformly underfills its lattes, and
misrepresents to its customers the amount of latte that will be in
its various sized cups.  On May 26, 2016, Starbucks moved the
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to coordinate or
consolidate the case with three others currently pending in
federal court, and to transfer the cases to the Western District
of Washington.

The case had an initial case management conference scheduled for
July 11, 2016. Prior to the case management conference, the
parties will have participated in the Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(f) conference and provided initial disclosures.

Defendant moved to stay all proceedings pending a decision by the
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on whether to
consolidate the present action with other actions.

Judge Henderson granted in part and denied in part defendant's
motion to stay the proceedings. The parties were directed to
attend the initial case management conference on July 11, 2016.
In addition, the parties may proceed with the following written
discovery: requests for admissions, interrogatories, and requests
for document production.

However, Defendant's motion is granted as to depositions. Neither
party may notice any depositions until the Panel has issued a
ruling on Defendant's motion to coordinate, unless otherwise
ordered by this Court. The Court encourages the parties to
cooperate during the pendency of the motion before the Panel to
minimize any potential prejudice to either side.

A copy of Judge Henderson's order dated July 6, 2016, is available
at http://goo.gl/e7r28Lfrom Leagle.com.

Plaintiffs, represented by Lawrence Timothy Fisher --
ltfisher@bursor.com -- Scott A. Bursor -- scott@bursor.com -- at
Bursor & Fisher, P.A.; Gerald R. Healy -- John Hafemann at
Military Justice Attorneys, PLLC

Starbucks Corporation, Defendant, represented by Robert James
Guite -- rguite@sheppardmullin.com -- Fred R. Puglisi --
fpuglisi@sheppardmullin.com -- Robin Andrea Achen --
rachen@sheppardmullin.com -- Sascha Von Mende Henry --
shenry@sheppardmullin.com -- at Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
LLP


SUPREME SERVICE: Faces "Blake" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
----------------------------------------------------------------
MICHAEL BLAKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY
SITUATED v. SUPREME SERVICE & SPECIALTY COMPANY, INC. Case 2:16-
cv-12713 (E.D. La., July 13, 2016), seeks to recover overtime
wages brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Supreme Service & Specialty Company, Inc. provides construction
services. The Company rents and leases heavy construction
equipment.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Michael T. Tusa Jr, Esq.
     SUTTON, ALKER & RATHER, LLC
     4080 Lonesome Road, Suite A
     Mandeville, LA 70448
     Phone: (985) 727-7501
     Fax: (985) 727-7505
     E-mail: mtusa@sutton-alker.com

        - and -

     Clif Alexander, Esq.
     ANDERSON2X, PLLC
     819 N. Upper Broadway
     Corpus Christi, TX 78401
     Phone: (361) 452-1279
     Fax: (361) 452-1284
     E-mail: clif@a2xlaw.com


TACO BELL: Judge Granted in Part Bid for Fees in Wage & Hour Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone of the Eastern District of
California granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs' motion
in the case entitled IN RE TACO BELL WAGE AND HOUR ACTIONS, Case
No. 1:07-cv-01314-SAB (E.D. Cal.)

A jury trial was held on February 22, 2016, on the claims of the
Late Meal Period Class, the Underpaid Meal Period Class, and the
Rest Period Class, three classes which had been certified. The
parties agreed to have the court decide plaintiffs' claims under
California's Private Attorney General Act.

The jury found that the Late Meal Period Class had proved that
Defendant had a standardized or uniform policy that did not
provide meal periods that began before the end of the fifth hour
an employee worked for the relevant time period. But the Class did
not prove that during the relevant time period class members were
non-exempt employees who worked for a corporate Taco Bell
Corporate restaurant and worked shifts longer than six hours
without being provided a meal period that began before the end of
the fifth hour of work.

Similarly, the jury found that the Rest Period Class had proved
that Defendant had a standardized or uniform company-wide policy
that did not authorize and permit a second ten minute or a net
twenty minute rest period when an employee worked more than six
hours and less than seven hours. But the Class did not prove that
that during the relevant time period class members were non-exempt
employees who worked for a corporate Taco Bell Corporate
restaurant and worked shifts longer than six hours but less than
seven hours without being authorized and permitted to take a
second ten minute or net twenty minute rest period.

The jury found that the Underpaid Meal Premium Class had proved
that from September 7, 2003 through November 12, 2007, Defendant
had a standardized or uniform company-wide policy that underpaid
meal premiums for missed or short meal periods and that during
this time period the class members were non-exempt employees who
worked for a Taco Bell Corporate restaurant and missed or received
short meal periods and were paid a meal premium payment of less
than one full hour of compensation. The jury awarded damages in
the amount of $495,913.66 to the Underpaid Meal Premium Class.

Plaintiffs filed a motion for attorneys' fees, litigation expenses
and enhancement awards. Plaintiffs seek attorney fees in the
amount of $7,323,777.50. Defendants counter that plaintiffs
requested hourly rates and stated hours are unreasonable and
should also be reduced due to their limited success in this
action. Plaintiffs are also seeking to be compensated for 12,876
hours expended in the litigation by Capstone Law, APC, 6,333.5
hours, Initiative Legal Group APC, 4,767.3 hours, Stuart Chandler,
APC, 545 hours, Law Offices of Mark Yablonovich, 515.1 hours and
716 hours by Bisnar Chase. Defendants argue that due to the number
of law firms involved in the action, the case was overstaffed
which resulted in expending an unreasonable number of hours.

Plaintiffs also seek a multiplier of 1.5 to enhance their attorney
fees. Defendants counter that no multiplier is warranted.
Plaintiffs Medlock and Hardiman seek an enhancement award for
acting as class representatives in the action. Defendants counter
that plaintiffs are not entitled to an enhancement award as their
participation in the action was not extraordinary.

Magistrate Judge Boone granted in part and denied in part
plaintiffs' motion for attorney fees, costs, and enhancement
awards. Plaintiffs are awarded attorney fees in the amount of
$1,156,821.12. Plaintiffs' motion for costs is denied and
plaintiffs Medlock and Hardiman's motion for incentive awards is
denied.

A copy of Magistrate Judge Boone's order dated July 15, 2016, is
available at http://goo.gl/4mNHdzfrom Leagle.com.

Sandrika Medlock, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Joseph
Sokolowski -- Andrew.Sokolowski@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Jennifer
Renee Bagosy -- Jennifer.Bagosy@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Jonathan
Sing Lee -- Jonathan.Lee@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Raul Perez --
Raul.Perez@Capstonelawyers.com -- Rebecca Maria Labat --
Rebecca.Labat@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Robert J. Drexler --
Robert.Drexler@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Matthew Thomas Theriault --
Matthew.Theriault@CapstoneLawyers.com -- at Capstone Law APC;
Monica Balderrama -- MBalderrama@initiativelegal.com -- at
Initiative Legal Group APC; Stuart Rowe Chandler --
stuart@chandlerlaw.com -- at Law Office Of Stuart R. Chandler

Lisa Hardiman, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Joseph Sokolowski
-- Andrew.Sokolowski@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Jennifer Renee Bagosy
-- Jennifer.Bagosy@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Matthew Thomas Theriault
-- Matthew.Theriault@CapstoneLawyers.com -- at Capstone Law APC

Miriam Leyva, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Joseph Sokolowski -
- Andrew.Sokolowski@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Matthew Thomas
Theriault -- Matthew.Theriault@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Rebecca
Maria Labat -- Rebecca.Labat@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Robert J.
Drexler -- Robert.Drexler@CapstoneLawyers.com -- at Capstone Law
APC; Timothy Donahue -- tdonahue@attorneydonahue.com -- at Law
Offices Of Timothy Donahue

Lisa Hardiman, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Joseph Sokolowski
-- Andrew.Sokolowski@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Jonathan Sing Lee --
Jonathan.Lee@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Matthew Thomas Theriault --
Matthew.Theriault@CapstoneLawyers.com -- at Capstone Law APC;
Monica Balderrama -- MBalderrama@initiativelegal.com -- Marc Primo
Pulisci -- MarcPrimo@InitiativeLegal.com -- at Initiative Legal
Group LLP

Loraine Naranjo, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Joseph
Sokolowski -- Andrew.Sokolowski@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Matthew
Thomas Theriault -- Matthew.Theriault@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Raul
Perez -- Raul.Perez@Capstonelawyers.com -- Rebecca Maria Labat --
Rebecca.Labat@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Robert J. Drexler --
Robert.Drexler@CapstoneLawyers.com -- at Capstone Law APC; Kenneth
Yoon at Law Offices Of Kenneth H. Yoon; Peter M. Hart --
hartpeter@msn.com -- at Law Offices of Peter M. Hart; Larry W. Lee
-- lwlee@diversitylaw.com -- at Diversity Law Group

Endang Widjaja, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Joseph Sokolowski
-- Andrew.Sokolowski@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Matthew Thomas
Theriault -- Matthew.Theriault@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Raul Perez -
- Raul.Perez@Capstonelawyers.com -- Rebecca Maria Labat --
Rebecca.Labat@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Robert J. Drexler --
Robert.Drexler@CapstoneLawyers.com -- at Capstone Law APC;
Jerusalem F. Beligan -- jbeligan@bisnarchase.com -- at Bisnar
Chase, LLP

Christopher Duggan, Hilario Escobar, and Debra Doyle, Plaintiffs,
represented by Andrew Joseph Sokolowski --
Andrew.Sokolowski@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Matthew Thomas Theriault
-- Matthew.Theriault@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Raul Perez --
Raul.Perez@Capstonelawyers.com -- Rebecca Maria Labat --
Rebecca.Labat@CapstoneLawyers.com -- Robert J. Drexler --
Robert.Drexler@CapstoneLawyers.com -- at Capstone Law APC; Joseph
Hoff -- Mark Yablonovich -- mark@yablonovichlaw.com -- Patrick
Joseph Clifford -- patrick@yablonovichlaw.com -- at Law Offices Of
Mark Yablonovich

Defendants, represented by Morgan Patricia Forsey --
mforsey@sheppardmullin.com -- Nora K. Stiles --
nstiles@sheppardmullin.com -- Tracey Adano Kennedy --
tkennedy@sheppardmullin.com -- at Sheppard Mullin Richter and
Hampton


TARGET CORP: Faces "Knoll" Lawsuit Alleging Violation of ERISA
--------------------------------------------------------------
MITCHELL W. KNOLL, on behalf of the Target Corporation 401(k)
Plan, himself, and a class consisting of similarly situated
participants of the Plan, v. TARGET CORPORATION, PLAN INVESTMENT
COMMITTEE, JOHN J. MULLIGAN, JOHN DOES, and RICHARD ROES, CASE
0:16-cv-02400-PJS-TNL (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF
MINNESOTA, July 12, 2016), was filed on behalf of the Target
Corporation 401(k) Plan, pursuant to the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act.

Target Corporation is an upscale discount retailer.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     David E. Krause, Esq.
     DAVID E. KRAUSE LAW OFFICE
     2716 Colfax Avenue South
     Minneapolis, MN 55408
     Phone: (612) 872-8446
     E-mail: dkrause@davidkrauselaw.com

        - and -

     Michael J. Klein, Esq.
     STULL, STULL & BRODY
     6 East 45th Street
     New York, NY 10017
     Phone: (212) 687-7230
     Fax: (212) 490-2022
     E-mail: mklein@ssbny.com


THERANOS INCORPORATED: Faces "R.C." Suit in D. Ariz.
----------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Theranos Incorporated. The case
is captioned R.C., individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Theranos Incorporated, a
California Corporation, and Walgreens Boots Alliance Incorporated,
a Delaware Corporation, the Defendant, Case No. 2:16-cv-02373-SPL
(D. Ariz., July 15, 2016). The assigned Judge is Hon. Steven P
Logan.

Theranos is a consumer healthcare technology company.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gretchen F Cappio, Esq.
          Lynn Lincoln Sarko, Esq.
          Mark D Samson, Esq.
          Ron Kilgard, Esq.
          T David Copley, Esq.
          KELLER ROHRBACK LLP
          1201 3rd Ave., Ste 3200
          Seattle, WA 98101-3276
          Telephone: (206) 623 1900
          E-mail: lsarko@kellerrohrback.com
                  msamson@kellerrohrback.com
                  rkilgard@krplc.com
                  dcopley@kellerrohrback.com


TITAN PETROSERVICES: Faces "Edwards" Suit Over FLSA Violation
-------------------------------------------------------------
CHAD EDWARDS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. TITAN PETROSERVICES, LLC and ROBERT BOOTH, Case 7:16-
cv-00273-RAJ (W.D. Tex., July 13, 2016), seeks to recover
compensation, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs,
pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Titan Petroservices, LLC is based in Midland, Texas and provides
oilfield services to drilling and production sites throughout the
Permian Basin and the surrounding West Texas region.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Clif Alexander, Esq.
     ANDERSON2X, PLLC
     819 N. Upper Broadway
     Corpus Christi, TX 78401
     Phone: (361) 452-1279
     Fax: (361) 452-1284
     E-mail: clif@a2xlaw.com


TURK COLLECTORS: Faces "Murray-Sims" Suit in D.N.J.
---------------------------------------------------a
A lawsuit has been filed against Turk Collectors, Inc. The case is
styled SHAWN MURRAY-SIMS, Individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. TURK COLLECTORS, INC., and
JOHN DOES 1-25, the Defendant, Case No. 3:16-cv-04360-FLW-DEA
(D.N.J., July 18, 2016). The assigned Judge is Hon. Freda L.
Wolfson.

Turk Collectors is a professional collection agency specializing
in the collection of delinquent accounts.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          ARI HILLEL MARCUS, Esq.
          MARCUS ZELMAN LLC
          1500 Allaire Avenue, Suite 101
          OCEAN, NJ 07712
          Telephone: (732) 695 3282
          Facsimile: (732) 298 6256
          E-mail: ari@marcuszelman.com


TWINS GROUP: Faces "Combs" Suit Under FLSA, Ohio Wage Act
---------------------------------------------------------
AARON COMBS 902 Highridge Ave. Dayton, OH 45420 Plaintiff, for
himself, and all others similarly situated, v. THE TWINS GROUP,
INC. Serve Statutory Agent: Lacine Hunt 3019 S. Kettering Blvd.
Moraine, OH 45439, Case: 3:16-cv-00295-TMR (S.D. Ohio, July 14,
2016), was brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act and
Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act.

Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a Crew Member at Defendant's
Taco Bell.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Bradley L. Gibson, Esq.
     GIBSON LAW, LLC
     9200 Montgomery, Rd., Suite 11A
     Cincinnati, OH 45242
     Phone: (513) 834-8254
     E-mail: brad@gibsonemploymentlaw.com


UBER TECHNOLOGIES: Aug. 18 Hearing on Bid to Enforce Subpoenas
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Plaintiff, v. UBER
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant, Case No. 16-mc-80057-KAW (N.D.
Cal.), Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore continued to Aug. 18,
2016, the hearing on the Plaintiff's application for an order
enforcing two administrative subpoenas and the Defendant's motion
to stay.

The case alleges unfair labor practices against the Defendant. A
copy of the court's order dated July 6, 2016 is available at
http://goo.gl/y3AAm3from Leagle.com.

The court added that Petitioner, as a Board, has a broad
investigatory authority which may continue to manage discovery in
the cases before it. Both parties are encouraged to continue their
meet and confer efforts regarding the scope of the subpoenas to
avoid unnecessary motion practice.

Uber Technologies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Robert G.
Hulteng -- rhulteng@littler.com -- Littler Mendelson, P.C.,
Elizabeth Parry -- mparry@littler.com -- Littler Mendelson, P.C. &
Lauren Elizabeth Meyerholz -- lmeyerholz@littler.com -- Littler
Mendelson, PC.


UNITED STATES: 9th Cir. Interprets Agreement and Remands Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
Circuit Judge Andrew David Hurwitz of the United States Court of
Appeals, Ninth Circuit, affirmed in part, reversed in part, and
remanded the appealed case of, JENNY LISETTE FLORES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Attorney General
of the United States; JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of Homeland Security;
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and its subordinate
entities; U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; U.S. CUSTOMS
AND BORDER PROTECTION, Defendants-Appellants, No. 15-56434 (9th
Cir.).

In 1984, the Western Region of the Immigration and Naturalization
Service (INS) adopted a policy prohibiting the release of detained
minors to anyone other than a parent or lawful guardian, except in
unusual and extraordinary cases. The next year, Jenny Lisette
Flores filed an action in the Central District of California,
challenging the policy and the conditions under which juveniles
were detained pursuant to the policy.

In 1987, the court approved a consent decree settling the
detention condition claims. The agreement required the government
to house all juveniles detained more than 72 hours following
arrest in a facility that meets or exceeds certain standards,
except in unusual and extraordinary circumstances.

The district court then granted the Flores class partial summary
judgment on the claim that the INS violated the Equal Protection
Clause by treating alien minors in deportation proceedings
differently from alien minors in exclusion proceedings, the latter
of whom were sometimes released to adults other than their
parents. In response, the INS adopted a rule allowing juveniles to
be released to their parents, adult relatives, or custodians
designated by their parents; if no adult relative was available,
the rule gave the INS discretion to release a detained relative
with the child.

In 1997, the parties entered into a settlement agreement which
sets out nationwide policy for the detention, release, and
treatment of minors in the custody of the INS. The settlement
creates a presumption in favor of releasing minors and requires
placement of those not released in licensed, non-secure facilities
that meet certain standards.

In 2014, in response to a surge of Central Americans attempting to
enter the United States without documentation, the government
opened family detention centers in Texas and New Mexico. The
detention and release policies at the centers do not comply with
the settlement. The government, however, claims that the
settlement only applies to unaccompanied minors and is not
violated when minors accompanied by parents or other adult family
members are placed in these centers.

In 2015, Flores moved to enforce the settlement, arguing that it
applied to all minors in the custody of immigration authorities.
The district court agreed, granted the motion to enforce, and
rejected the government's alternative motion to modify the
settlement.

The court ordered the government to make prompt and continuous
efforts toward family reunification, release class members without
unnecessary delay, detain class members in appropriate facilities,
release an accompanying parent when releasing a child unless the
parent is subject to mandatory detention or poses a safety risk or
a significant flight risk, monitor compliance with detention
conditions, and provide class counsel with monthly statistical
information. The government appealed, challenging the district
court's holding that the settlement applied to all minors in
immigration custody, its order to release parents, and its denial
of the motion to modify.

Judge Hurwitz held that the settlement applies unambiguously
applies both to accompanied and unaccompanied minors, but does not
create affirmative release rights for parents. Judge Hurwitz
affirmed the district court in part, reversed in part, and
remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings.

A copy of Judge Hurwitz's opinion dated July 6, 2016, is available
at http://goo.gl/ulO0Gofrom Leagle.com.

For Defendants-Appellants, Leon Fresco, Deputy Assistant Attorney
General; Sarah B. Fabian, Senior Litigation Counsel; William C.
Peachey, Director, District Court Section; Benjamin C. Mizer,
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division;
United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration
Litigation

Peter Anthony Schey -- pschey@centerforhumanrights.org -- Carlos
R. Holguin at Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law;
T. Wayne Harman -- wharman@orrick.com -- Elena Garcia --
egarcia@orrick.com -- at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Peter Anthony Schey (argued) and Carlos R. Holguin, Center for
Human Rights and Constitutional Law, Los Angeles, California;
T. Wayne Harman and Elena Garcia, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
LLP, Los Angeles, California; for Plaintiff-Appellee.


URANIUM ENERGY: Judge Granted Bid to Dismiss "Stephens" Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Lee H. Rosenthal of the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division, granted defendants' motion to dismiss in the
case HEATHER M. STEPHENS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. URANIUM ENERGY CORP., et al.,
Defendants, Civil Action No. H-15-1862 (S.D. Tex.).

Uranium Energy Corporation is a Vancouver-based uranium
exploration-and-production company. It owns the mineral rights to
uranium-mining projects in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas,
Wyoming, and Paraguay. The company also owns and operates a Texas-
based uranium mine that extracts and processes uranium oxide for
sale to nuclear power plants. Uranium Energy advertised its stock
by paying third-party promoters to circulate positive articles,
newsletters, and email alerts touting its financial strength and
prospects for future growth.

Lead plaintiff Heather Stephens filed a putative class action suit
alleging that the advertising campaign, and the failure adequately
to disclose it in Securities Exchange Act filings, violated the
federal securities laws. Heather sued Uranium Energy its
cofounder, president, and CEO, Amir Adnani, its CFO, Mark
Katsumata, and the third-party promoters, Raven Consulting Corp.,
LuckyStockPicks.com, Brazil Resources, Inc., Red Rock Media Group,
Inc., Action Holdings, Inc., and Stock Gumshoe, Inc. Stephens
asserted claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15
U.S.C. Sections 78a-78pp, and sought to represent purchasers of
Uranium Energy's stock between June 7, 2013 and June 17, 2015.

Stephens filed an amended complaint alleging that all of the
defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C.
Section 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. Section 240.10b-5, and
that Uranium Energy, Adnani, and Katsumata violated Section 20(a)
of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 78t(a). She alleged that
Uranium Energy's SEC disclosures misled investors by failing to
disclose that the promotional campaign increased the company's
stock-price volatility and that the company had engaged in a
scheme and course of business to conceal the extent of its
involvement in the promotional campaign, including paying for the
promotions, directly or otherwise.

The defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing
that the amended complaint failed to allege materially misleading
omissions that the defendants had a duty to make, facts giving
rise to a strong inference of scienter and loss causation. They
also argued that the amended complaint failed to allege a
fraudulent scheme. Uranium Energy, Adnani, and Katsumata argued
that they lacked the ability to control the omissions and
violations alleged, defeating Section 20(a) liability.

Judge Rosenthal granted defendants' motion to dismiss and
dismisses the case with prejudice.

A copy of Judge Rosenthal's memorandum and opinion dated July 15,
2016, is available at http://goo.gl/Ua8vVlfrom Leagle.com.

Heather M. Stephens, Plaintiff, represented by Phillip Kim --
pkim@rosenlegal.com -- Laurence M. Rosen -- lrosen@rosenlegal.com
-- at The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.; R. Dean Gresham at GRESHAM PC;
Sammy Ford, IV -- sford@azalaw.com -- at Ahmad Zavitsanos
Anaipakos Alavi & Mensing PC

Robert Cramer, Plaintiff, represented by R. Dean Gresham at
GRESHAM PC; Jacob A. Goldberg -- jgoldberg@rosenlegal.com -- Keith
Robert Lorenze -- klorenze@rosenlegal.com -- at The Rosen Law
Firm, P.A.

Chris Jones, Plaintiff, represented by Sammy Ford, IV --
sford@azalaw.com -- at Ahmad Zavitsanos Anaipakos Alavi & Mensing
PC; Laurence M. Rosen -- lrosen@rosenlegal.com -- at The Rosen Law
Firm, P.A.

Mark Besendorfer, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas E. Bilek at The
Bilek Law Firm LLP; Adam Marc Apton -- aapton@zlk.com -- at Levi &
Korsinsky LLP

Lead Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas E. Bilek at The
Bilek Law Firm LLP; Keith Robert Lorenze --
klorenze@rosenlegal.com -- at The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
Defendanst, represented by Gerard G. Pecht --
gerard.pecht@nortonrosefulbright.com -- Peter Andrew Stokes --
peter.stokes@nortonrosefulbright.com -- at Fulbright & Jaworski


VIACOM INC: Sunrise Retirement Suit Questions Viacom Leadership
---------------------------------------------------------------
City of Sunrise General Employees' Retirement Plan, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v.
Sumner M. Redstone, Shari Redstone, Viacom Inc., National
Amusements, Inc., NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC, George S.
Abrams, Philippe Dauman, Thomas E. Dooley, Cristiana Falcone
Sorrell, Blythe J. Mcgarvie, Deborah Norville, Charles E.
Phillips, Jr., Frederic V. Salerno, William Schwartz, Nicole
Seligman, Kenneth Lerer, Thomas J. May, Judith Mchale and Ronald
Nelson, Defendants, Case No. 12545 (Del. Ch., July 8, 2016), seeks
monetary and equitable relief, including declaratory and
injunctive relief, reasonable attorneys' fees, accountants and
experts' fees, costs and expenses and such other and further
relief for breach of fiduciary duty and invalidation of Article
III Section 16 of Viacom's Bylaws.

Plaintiff is a holder of shares of Class B common stock of Viacom
Inc. It questions the continued leadership and integrity of
Viacom's majority stockholder, Summer M. Redstone and asserts that
Viacom's board of directors manipulate voting privileges to ensure
his continued control.

National Amusements, Inc. and NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC are
the business entities in which Redstone control Viacom.

George S. Abrams, Philippe Dauman, Thomas E. Dooley, Cristiana
Falcone Sorrell, Blythe J. Mcgarvie, Deborah Norville, Charles E.
Phillips, Jr., Frederic V. Salerno, William Schwartz, Nicole
Seligman, Kenneth Lerer, Thomas J. May, Judith Mchale and Ronald
Nelson are members of the board of directors of Viacom.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Corinne Elise Amato, Esq.
     Michael Hanrahan, Esq.
     Paul A. Fioravanti, Jr., Esq.
     Elizabeth M. McGeever, Esq.
     Corinne Elise Amato, Esq.
     PRICKETT, JONES & ELLIOTT, P.A.
     1310 N. King Street
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Tel: (302) 888-6500
     Fax: (302) 658-8111

           - and -

     Eric L. Zagar, Esq.
     Robin Winchester, Esq.
     Kristen L. Ross, Esq.
     KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP
     280 King of Prussia Road
     Radnor, PA 19087
     Tel: (610) 667-7706
     Fax: (267) 948-2512


VIGILANT INSURANCE: No Breach in Obtaining Consent, Judge Says
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Charles E. Ramos of the Supreme Court of New York County
ruled on the parties' motions in the case J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES
INC., J.P. MORGAN CLEARING CORP., and THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES
LLC, Plaintiffs, v. VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, THE TRAVELERS
INDEMNITY COMPANY, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL UNION FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON and AMERICAN
ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendants. Docket No.
600979/09 (N.Y.)

In November 2004, Bear Stearns Companies LLC notified its Insurers
of 13 class action complaints which had been served on Bear
Stearns, and that it received a Wells Notice from the SEC. Bear
Stearns settled with the SEC on March 16, 2006 for $160 million
and ultimately settled the civil actions for $14 million.

Bear Stearns seeks a declaration that its insurers are required to
indemnify it for claims stemming from Bear Stearns' monetary
settlement of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) regulatory proceedings and related
private litigation predicated on allegations that Bear Stearns
facilitated its customers' deceptive market timing and late
trading activities.

Bear Stearns moves, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for an order granting
partial summary judgment in its favor dismissing the defenses in
which defendants contend that Bear Stearns breached the insurance
policy conditions requiring it to obtain defendants' consent to
settle and Bear Stearns breached its duty to cooperate. In support
of its motion, Bear Stearns argues that New York law is clear that
where, as here, an insurer denies liability, the insured is free
to enter into a reasonable settlement without obtaining the
insurer' consent. Bear Stearns argues that the investigation
demands made by the SEC, NYSE and other regulatory governmental
bodies made plainly constituted a claim, which was broadly defined
in the policy to include any investigation into violations of law
or regulation initiated by regulators against an insured for any
wrongful act.

Defendants Vigilant Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity
Company, Federal Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance
Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company,
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and American Alternative
Insurance Corporation cross-move, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for an
order granting summary judgment in their favor, dismissing the
complaint. In opposition to Bear Stearns' motion and in support of
their cross-motion for summary judgment, the insurers maintain
that the settlement that Bear Stearns entered into with the SEC in
2006 is not insurable because Bear Stearns failed to obtain their
consent to that settlement, and because it failed to cooperate and
provide the insurers with even the most basic information about
the defense and settlement of the SEC's charges information that
the insurers reasonably requested and needed in order to evaluate
the claims, defenses and proposed settlement of the SEC
investigation.

Judge Ramos granted plaintiff's motion for an order granting
partial summary judgment to the extent that the defense in which
defendants contend that Bear Stearns breached its duty to
cooperate is dismissed, and the defense in which defendants
contend that Bear Stearns' settlement terms were unreasonable is
denied, in part and further ordered that defendants' cross-motion
for an order granting summary judgment in their favor is denied in
its entirety.

A copy of Judge Ramos's order dated July 7, 2016, is available at
http://goo.gl/3rxnbcfrom Leagle.com.


                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Marion
Alcestis A. Castillon, Ma. Cristina Canson, Noemi Irene A. Adala,
Joy A. Agravante, Valerie Udtuhan, Julie Anne L. Toledo,
Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2016. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.



                 * * *  End of Transmission  * * *