CAR_Public/160712.mbx              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Vol. 18, No. 138




                            Headlines


215 SOHO: Faces "Lopez" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
68TH GRILL: "Cocoletzi" Suit Alleges Violation of N.Y. Labor Laws
ADCARE HEALTH: Two Individual Agreements Still Await Approval
AEGERION PHARMACEUTICALS: Plaintiffs May File 3rd Amended Suit
AEROTEK INC: Sued in Cal. Over Failure to Pay Minimum Wages

ADVANCED DATA: Faces Physicians Healthsource Suit in New Jersey
AKI KING: Faces "Zhu" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
ALCON LABORATORIES: "Voss" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages
ALL STAR: Faces "Liscano" Lawsuit in Fla. Pursuant to FLSA
ALLERGAN PLC: Fund Sues Over Doxycycline, Digoxin "Price Fixing"

AMERICAN GUARD: Does Not Properly Pay Employees, "Cole" Suit Says
AUTOSPORT HONDA: Faces "Kaufman" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
AUTOTRADER.COM INC: Faces Ga. Suit Over "Overstated" Reporting
BEST FOOD: Fails to Pay Employees OT Wages, "Zheng" Suit Says
BLUEGREEN VACATIONS: Faces "Miles" Suit in E.D. Cal.

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces "Howley" Suit Over Pradaxa(R) Drugs
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces "Weymans" Suit Over Pradaxa(R) Drugs
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces "Blessman" Suit Over Pradaxa(R) Drug
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces "Kerby" Suit Over Pradaxa(R) Drugs
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces "McNulty" Suit Over Pradaxa(R) Drugs

BOOMTOWN ENTERTAINMENT: Judge Barrett Certified Opt-In Class
BOSELLI & SONS: Sued Over Failure to Provide Meal and Rest Breaks
BRANNONS SANDWICH: Elfoulki Files Appeal From S.D.N.Y. Ruling
BUCKLES & BUCKLES: Van Hoven Seeks Certification of Class
CALLSMART INC: Status Hearing Set for August 30 in "Dolemba" Suit

CAR GUYS: "Tundis" Suit Seeks Compensatory Damages Under FLSA
CAREFIRST INC: Chambliss Appeals D. Md. Ruling to 4th Circuit
CAREVANTAGE MEDICAL: "Fuentes" Class Suit Removed to S.D. Florida
CELATOR PHARMACEUTICALS: Sued Over Proposed Jazz Pharma Merger
CELATOR PHARMACEUTICALS: Faces "Barreto" Suit Over Jazz Merger

CENTRAL REFRIGERATED: Renewed Motion to Certify Class Due Sep. 12
CHANTICLEER HOLDINGS: Class Action Claim Forms Being Distributed
CHAPARRAL ENERGY: Still Defending Naylor Farms Suit
CHAPARRAL ENERGY: "Dodgson" Class Suit Pending in Oklahoma
CHAPARRAL ENERGY: Donelson-Friend Suit Pending in Oklahoma

CHAPARRAL ENERGY: Dismissal of West-Hopson Action Sought
COTY INC: "Blank" Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages Under Labor Code
CRESCENT CITY CONSULTING: Court Certifies FLSA Class
DESCARTES FINANCIAL: Escobar Seeks Earned Wages Under Labor Code
DOORSTEP DELIVERY: Sued in M.D. Florida Over Automated Calls

DISPATCH TAXI: Faces "Dominguez" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
DVE MANAGEMENT: Faces "Harris" Suit Alleging Violation of FLSA
EDGEWELL PERSONAL: Faces "Birmingham" Suit in C.D. Cal.
EIGER BIOPHARMACEUTICALS: Seeks Dismissal of Securities Class Suit
EMERY WILSON: Seeks Review of Ruling in "Meinders" Class Suit

EXPANSION CAPITAL: Kristensen Seeks Certification of Classes
FORD MOTOR: Motion to Dismiss "Anderson" Suit Under Advisement
FORMULA SYSTEMS: Court Partially Approved Agreement
GOOGLE INC: Fillekes Seeks Certification of Opt-in FLSA Class
GRAY & GRAY: Yarbrough Seeks Certification of Class & Subclass

HANSEN MEDICAL: Request to Dismiss Stevens-Juhl Action Pending
HANSEN MEDICAL: Windward Venture Files Class Action
HOBART SERVICE: Seeks Review of Ruling in "Alcantar" Class Suit
HOUSE OF TOMORROW: Scams Texas Homeowners, "Guerra" Suit Claims
INDUSTRIAL SPECIALISTS: Sued Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages

INTEGRA PROPERTY: Faces "Murray" Suit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
INTOUCH MOBILE: Faces "Gutierrez" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
JBS CARRIERS: Faces "Ryan" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
KBR INC: Faces "Ruiz" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
LEASE SUPERVISORS: Faces "Mallory" Suit Alleging ERISA Violation

LEIKIN & INGBER: Walker Seeks Certification of Class & Subclass
LIVHOME INC: Does Not Properly Pay Employees, "Bonner" Suit Says
MANASSEH JORDAN: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, "Carcelen" Suit Says
MCDONALD'S CORP: California Court Certifies Class in "Ochoa" Suit
MCLEOD EXPRESS: Downs Seeks Certification of FLSA Class

MELITTA USA: Decerbo Seeks Certification of Class in M.D. Fla.
MERIDIAN FINANCIAL: Appeal Filed in "Saulsberry" Class Suit
MIDLAND CREDIT: Illegally Collects Debt, "Abergel" Suit Claims
MOBILELINK VIRGINIA: Faces Va. Suit Alleging Violation of FLSA
NANTKWEST INC: To Defend Against Calif. Securities Class Action

NATIONAL STORES: Faces "Medellin" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
NESTLE WATERS: Ortega Seeks Penalties & Wages Under Labor Code
NETFLIX INC: Faces "Keritsis" Lawsuit Alleging Breach of Contract
NTELOS HOLDINGS: Westen and Sekerak Class Actions Dismissed
ORCHESTRATE HOSPITALITY: Edwards Seeks OK of $163,000 Settlement

PAYMENT DATA: Court Tossed Claims Against 2 Directors
PAYMENT DATA: McFarland Refiled Class Action Lawsuit
PECO FOODS: Faces Alabama Lawsuit Alleging Violation of FLSA
PENANG HOUSE: Faces "Wei" Class Suit Alleging Violations of FLSA
PHARMAVITE LLC: Bid to Certify Class in "Bradach" Suit Denied

PINCHER'S BEACH: Class of Servers Certified in "Campbell" Suit
PIONEER CREDIT: Faces "Biber" Suit in E.D. Va.
RADIANT LOGISTICS: Barahona Class Action Pending in California
RUSSELL'S TRAILER: Faces "Carson" Suit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
SANDRIDGE ENERGY: Securities Litigation in Early Stages

SANDRIDGE ENERGY: "Hart" Suit Terminated Following Bankruptcy
SANTA MONICA, CA: Sued in C.D. Cal. Over Civil Rights Violation
SEARS HOME: Colemans Seek Certification of Homeowners Class
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS: Faces "Gaal" Suit Over Aliso Gas Leak
SPARK NETWORKS: Settlement in Werner, Wright Cases Await Approval

SPARK NETWORKS: AG Has No Objection to Israeli Case Settlement
STAPLES INC: Faces "Braden" Suit in S.D. Fla.
STEPHENS INSTITUTE: Faces "Coleman" Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
STERN & EISENBERG: Faces "Reese" Suit in E.D. Virg.
SYNCHRONY BANK: Hearing on Class Cert. Bid Continued to Aug. 30

TITAN AMERICA: "Ordiozola" Class Suit Removed to S.D. Florida
TO-RISE LLC: Faces Lawsuit Alleging Violations of N.Y. Labor Laws
TRADER JOE'S: "Aliano" Suit Moved from N.D. Ill. to C.D. Cal.
UNITED AIRLINES: "Medina" Suit Seeks Penalties Under Labor Code
UNITED AIRLINES: Vidrio Seeks to Certify Flight Attendants Class

UNITED BUILDING: Faces "Jacob" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
UNITED STATES: "Golden" Class Suit Removed to Dist. Columbia
UNIVERSAL PICTURES: Fitzgerald Seeks Certification of Class
UNIVERSAL PROTECTION: Faces "Cooper" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
V&J NATIONAL: Faces "Spano" Suit Over Failure to Pay Min. Wage

VROOM INC: Faces "Amini" Lawsuit Alleging Violation of TCPA
WAL-MART STORES: "Reeves" Suit Consolidated in MDL 2705
WALGREEN CO: Faces "Heinzl" Suit in W.D. Penn.
WELLS FARGO: Seeks Review of Ruling in "McLaughlin" Class Suit
WELTMAN & WEINBERG: Verburg Seeks Certification of 3 Classes

WEST VIRGINIA: Faces "Greer" Suit in N.D. W. Virg.
WOODLAND, CA: Faces "Olson" Lawsuit Alleging FLSA Violation
YINGLI GREEN: Court Directed Plaintiffs to File Amended Suit


                            *********


215 SOHO: Faces "Lopez" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
---------------------------------------------------------------
Noe Isidoro Lopez, Nicasio Flores, Jose Vazquez, individually and
on behalf of others similarly situated v. 215 Soho Cafe Corp.
d/b/a Soho Cafe & Grill, 8312 Soho Caf Corp. d/b/a Soho Cafe and
Grill, and Jose Zosayas, Case No. 1:16-cv-03358 (E.D.N.Y., June
21, 2016), is brought against the Defendants for failure to pay
overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendants own and operate Soho Cafe & Grill restaurant in New
York.

Noe Isidoro Lopez, Nicasio Flores, Jose Vazquez are pro se
plaintiffs.


68TH GRILL: "Cocoletzi" Suit Alleges Violation of N.Y. Labor Laws
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ALFREDO MORENO COCOLETZI, individually and on behalf of others
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. 68TH GRILL INC. (d/b/a AMERICA'S
BURGERS & WRAPS), PETER NIKOLAKAKOS, and STAVROS
NIKOLAKAKOS Defendants, Case 1:16-cv-05159-PKC (S.D.N.Y., June 29,
2016), seeks to recover alleged unpaid minimum and overtime wages
pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, the New York Labor Law
and "overtime wage order" respectively and the "spread of hours"
and overtime wage orders of the New York Commissioner of Labor.

America's Burgers & Wraps is a restaurant owned by Peter
Nikolakakos and Stavros Nikolakakos located at 1159 Third Avenue,
New York, New York 10065.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Michael Faillace, Esq.
     MICHAEL FAILLACE & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
     60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2540
     New York, NY 10165
     Phone: (212) 317-1200


ADCARE HEALTH: Two Individual Agreements Still Await Approval
-------------------------------------------------------------
AdCare Health Systems, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that as of March 31,
2016, all but two of the individual settlement agreements had been
approved and the settlement consideration paid to the plaintiffs.

The Company is a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit
captioned Amy Cleveland et. al. v. APHR&R Nursing, LLC et al filed
on March 4, 2015 with the Circuit Court of Pulaski County,
Arkansas, 16th Division, 6th Circuit. On December 16, 2015, the
Company's insurance carrier reached a settlement with each of the
individual plaintiffs on behalf of the Company and all other
defendants pursuant to which separate payments are to be made by
the Company's carrier to the plaintiffs. The individual
settlements are contingent on approval by the probate courts
having jurisdiction over the deceased plaintiffs' respective
estates, if applicable. As of March 31, 2016, all but two of the
individual settlement agreements had been approved and the
settlement consideration paid to the plaintiffs.

AdCare Health Systems, Inc., through its subsidiaries is a self-
managed real estate investment company that invests primarily in
real estate purposed for long-term care and senior living. The
Company's business primarily consists of leasing and subleasing
such facilities to third-party tenants, which operate the
facilities. As of March 31, 2016, the Company owned, leased, or
managed for third parties 38 facilities primarily in the
Southeast. The operators of the Company's facilities provide a
range of health care services, including skilled nursing and
assisted living services, social services, various therapy
services, and other rehabilitative and healthcare services for
both long-term and short-stay patients and residents.


AEGERION PHARMACEUTICALS: Plaintiffs May File 3rd Amended Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that co-lead plaintiffs
and defendants filed a joint motion wherein the parties stipulated
that co-lead plaintiffs could file a third amended pleading within
30 days of the motion, thereby making moot defendants' pending
motion to strike the second amended pleading and co-lead
plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second amended pleading.

In January 2014, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against
the Company and certain of its executive officers in the United
States District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging
certain misstatements and omissions related to the marketing of
JUXTAPID and the Company's financial performance in violation of
the federal securities laws.

On March 11, 2015, the Court appointed co-lead plaintiffs and lead
counsel. On April 1, 2015, the Court entered an order permitting
and setting a schedule for co-lead plaintiffs to file an amended
complaint within 60 days, and for defendants to file responsive
pleadings, co-lead plaintiffs to file any opposition, and
defendants to file reply briefs. Accordingly, co-lead plaintiffs
filed an amended complaint on June 1, 2015. The amended complaint
filed against the Company and certain of its former executive
officers alleges that defendants made certain misstatements and
omissions during the first three quarters of 2014 related to the
Company's revenue projections for JUXTAPID for 2014, as well as
data underlying those projections, in violation of the federal
securities laws.

The Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint for
failure to state a claim on July 31, 2015.  On August 21, 2015,
co-lead plaintiffs filed a putative second amended complaint,
which alleges that the defendants made certain misstatements and
omissions from April 2013 through October 2014 related to the
marketing of JUXTAPID and the Company's financial projections, as
well as data underlying those projections.

On September 4, 2015, the Company moved to strike the second
amended complaint for the co-lead plaintiffs' failure to seek
leave of court to file a second amended pleading, and briefing is
complete with respect to the motion to strike.  Oral argument on
the motion to strike was held on March 9, 2016.

On March 23, 2016, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend.
The Company has opposed this motion to amend, and following a
hearing on April 29, 2016, the Court took defendants' motion to
strike and plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend under advisement.

On May 13, 2016, co-lead plaintiffs and defendants filed a joint
motion wherein the parties stipulated that co-lead plaintiffs
could file a third amended pleading within 30 days of the motion,
thereby making moot defendants' pending motion to strike the
second amended pleading and co-lead plaintiffs' motion for leave
to file a second amended pleading.  The motion also proposed a
briefing schedule for defendants to file responsive pleadings, co-
lead plaintiffs to file any opposition, and defendants to file
reply briefs.

As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, the Company cannot
determine if a loss is probable as a result of the class action
lawsuit and whether the outcome will have a material adverse
effect on its business and, as a result, the Company has not
recorded any amounts for a loss contingency.

Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company
dedicated to the development and commercialization of innovative
therapies for patients with debilitating rare diseases.


AEROTEK INC: Sued in Cal. Over Failure to Pay Minimum Wages
-----------------------------------------------------------
Jaime Echevarria, as an individual and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Aerotek, Inc. and Does 1 through 50,
inclusive, Case No. 16CV296589 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 17, 2016),
is brought against the Defendants for failure to pay minimum wages
to non-exempt temporary service employees and provide accurate
itemized wage statements.

Aerotek, Inc. owns and operates a staffing agency located in
Hanover, Maryland.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Larry W. Lee, Esq.
      Kristen M. Agnew, Esq.
      DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, P.C.
      515 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1250
      Los Angeles, CA 90071
      Telephone: (213) 488-6555
      Facsimile: (213) 488-6554

         - and -

      William L. Marder, Esq.
      POLARIS LAW GROUP LLP
      501 San Benito Street, Suite 200
      Hollister, CA 95023
      Telephone: (831) 531-4214
      Facsimile: (831) 634-0333
      E-mail: bill@polarislawgroup.com


ADVANCED DATA: Faces Physicians Healthsource Suit in New Jersey
---------------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been commenced against Advanced Data
Systems International, LLC and John Does 1-5.

The case is captioned Physicians Healthsource, Inc., individually
and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons
v. Advanced Data Systems International, LLC and John Does 1-5,
Case No. 2:16-cv-03620-JMV-JBC (D.N.J., June 21, 2016).

Advanced Data Systems International, LLC is a provider of
Electronic Health Record, Radiology Information System, Practice
Management, and Medical Billing software to medical practices and
Revenue Cycle Management companies.

The Plaintiff is represented by:
      Matthew Nicholas Fiorovanti, Esq.
      GIORDANO HALLERAN & CIESLA PC
      125 Half Mile, Suite 300
      Red Bank, NJ 07701
      Telephone: (732) 741-3900
      E-mail: mfiorovanti@ghclaw.com


AKI KING: Faces "Zhu" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------
Yanping Zhu, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Aki King Inc., Daiki Bistro Inc., Jian Li,
John Doe and Jane Doe # 1-10, Case No. 1:16-cv-04781 (S.D.N.Y.,
June 21, 2016), is brought against the Defendants for failure to
pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendants own and operate a restaurant located 219 East 23rd
Street, New York NY 10010.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jian Hang, Esq.
      HANG & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
      136-18 39th Ave., Suite 1003
      Flushing, NY 11354
      Telephone: (718) 353-8588
      E-mail: jhang@hanglaw.com


ALCON LABORATORIES: "Voss" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages
----------------------------------------------------------------
John Voss, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Case No. 0:16-cv-02040 (D. Minn.,
June 21, 2016), seeks to recover overtime compensation and other
relief relating to violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. is a global company that operates in
three areas relating to eyecare: surgical, pharmaceutical, and
vision care.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Michele R. Fisher, Esq.
      Robert L. Schug,Esq.
      NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP
      4600 IDS Center
      80 South 8th Street
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 256-3200
      E-mail: fisher@nka.com
              schug@nka.com

         - and -

      Jason T. Brown, Esq.
      Nicholas R. Conlon, Esq.
      JTB LAW GROUP, LLC
      155 2nd Street, Suite 4
      Jersey City, NJ 07302
      Telephone: (201) 630-0000
      E-mail: jtb@jtblawgroup.com
              nicholasconlon@jtblawgroup.com


ALL STAR: Faces "Liscano" Lawsuit in Fla. Pursuant to FLSA
-----------------------------------------------------------
LUIS LISCANO and other similarly-situated individuals, Plaintiff,
v. ALL STAR PAINTING AND WATERPROOFING INC., d/b/a ALL STAR
PAINTING, INC. and JUAN C. TRONCOSO, individually Defendants, Case
1:16-cv-22803-KMW (S.D. Fla., June 29, 2016), seeks to recover
money damages for unpaid half-time overtime wages under the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

All Star Painting offers commercial, residential and new
construction painting services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Zandro E. Palma, Esq.
     ZANDRO E. PALMA, P.A.
     9100 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1500
     Miami, FL 33156
     Phone: (305) 446-1500
     Fax: (305) 446-1502
     E-mail: zep@thepalmalawgroup.com


ALLERGAN PLC: Fund Sues Over Doxycycline, Digoxin "Price Fixing"
----------------------------------------------------------------
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 33 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff, v. ALLERGAN PLC; ACTAVIS, PLC; IMPAX LABORATORIES,
INC.; LANNETT, INC.; MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; PAR
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC.; and WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICALS
CORP., Defendants, Case 2:16-cv-03576-CMR (E.D. Pa., June 29,
2016), alleges a nationwide indirect purchaser antitrust action
arising out of a conspiracy to maintain supracompetitive prices
for doxycycline and digoxin.

Allergan plc is a pharmaceutical corporation incorporated in the
Republic of Ireland and headquartered in Dublin and Parsippany-
Troy Hills, New Jersey.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Jeffrey L. Kodroff, Esq.
     Jeffrey J. Corrigan, Esq.
     SPECTOR ROSEMAN KODROFF & WILLIS, P.C.
     1818 Market St., Suite 2500
     Philadelphia, PA 19103
     Phone: (215) 496-0300
     Fax: (215) 496-6611
     E-mail: jkodroff@srkw-law.com
             jcorrigan@srkw-law.com

        - and -

     Fred T. Isquith, Sr., Esq.
     Thomas H. Burt, Esq.
     Anita Kartalopolous, Esq.
     WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
     270 Madison Ave.
     New York, NY 10016
     Phone: (212) 545-4600
     Fax: (212) 686-0114
     E-mail: burt@whafh.com
             kartalopolous@whafh.com

        - and -

     Theodore B. Bell, Esq.
     Carl V. Malmstrom, Esq.
     WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLC
     One South Dearborn St., Suite 2122
     Chicago, IL 60603
     Phone: (312) 984-0000
     Fax: (312) 212-4496
     E-mail: tbell@whafh.com
             malmstrom@whafh.com

        - and -

     Michael McNally, Esq.
     FELHABER LARSON LLC
     220 South 6th St., Suite 2200
     Minneapolis, MN 55402
     Phone: (612) 339-6321
     Fax: (612) 338-0535
     E-mail: mcnally@felhaber.com


AMERICAN GUARD: Does Not Properly Pay Employees, "Cole" Suit Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sue Cole, as an individual and on behalf of II all others
similarly situated v. American Guard Services, Inc. and Does 1
through 50, inclusive, Case No. BC624200 (Cal. Super. Ct., June
17, 2016), is brought against the Defendants for failure to
provide off-duty meal periods and duty-free rest breaks, failure
to reimburse all business-related expenses, failure to pay minimum
wages, failure to keep accurate records under the California Labor
Code.

American Guard Services, Inc. is a California corporation doing
business in the State of California providing security services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Larry W. Lee, Esq.
      Kristen M. Agnew, Esq.
      Nicholas Rosenthal, Esq.
      DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
      515 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1250
      Los Angeles, CA 90071
      Telephone: (213) 488-6555
      Facsimile: (213) 488-6554


AUTOSPORT HONDA: Faces "Kaufman" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
------------------------------------------------------------
Stephanie Kaufman, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Autosport Honda, Acura of de Ville, Fiat of
Morris County and The Autosport Automotive Group, Case No. L-
003586-16 (N.J. Super. Ct., June 17, 2016), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendants operate a Honda dealership located at 1201 Route
22, Bridgewater, New Jersey.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Steven I. Alder, Esq.
      MANDELBAUM SALSBURG, P.C.
      3 Becker Farm Road, Suite 105
      Roseland, NJ 07068
      Telephone: (973) 736-4600
      E-mail: sadler@lawfirm.ms


AUTOTRADER.COM INC: Faces Ga. Suit Over "Overstated" Reporting
--------------------------------------------------------------
B&Z Auto Enterprises, LLC d/b/a/ Riverdale Chrysler Jeep d/b/a
Eastchester Chrysler Jeep Dodge d/b/a New York Cars Direct d/b/a
New York Autos Direct, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated, Plaintiff, vs. AutoTrader.com, Inc., Defendant, Case
1:16-cv-02313-MHC (N.D. Ga., June 29, 2016), alleges that
Plaintiff and purported members of the Class sustained economic
losses as a result of AutoTrader's reporting of overstated
performance numbers, by entering into subscription agreements for
premium listings and enhanced services, refraining from cancelling
those agreements, and over-paying for the premium listings and
enhanced services.

AutoTrader Inc. operates a digital automotive marketplace in the
United States and boasts as having 18.5 million unique visitors
monthly with average daily vehicle listings of 4.4 million.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     Zahra S. Karinshak, Esq.
     Jonathan E. Hawkins, Esq.
     KREVOLIN & HORST, LLC
     One Atlantic Center, Suite 3250
     1201 West Peachtree Street, NW
     Atlanta, GA 30309
     Phone: (404) 888-9700
     Fax: (404) 888-9577
     E-mail: Karinshak@khlawfirm.com
             Hawkins@khlawfirm.com

        - and -

     Kristi Shanke McGregor, Esq.
     Andrei Rado, Esq.
     Jennifer Cziesler, Esq.
     MILBERG LLP
     One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor
     New York, NY 10119
     Phone: (212) 594-5300
     E-mail: kmcgregor@milberg.com
             arado@milberg.com
             jczeisler@milberg.com

        - and -

     Leonard A. Bellavia, Esq.
     Steven H. Blatt, Esq.
     BELLAVIA BLATT & CROSSETT, PC
     200 Old Country Road, Suite 400
     Mineola, NY 11501
     Phone: (516) 873-3000
     E-mail: lbellavia@dealerlaw.com
             sblatt@dealerlaw.com


BEST FOOD: Fails to Pay Employees OT Wages, "Zheng" Suit Says
-------------------------------------------------------------
Zhou Ming Zheng, on behalf of himself and others similarly
situated v. Best Food In Town I. LLC d/b/a Best Food in Town; Best
Food In Town Jun LLC d/b/a Best Food in Town; Juoying Chen; Lin
Yan Zhao a/k/a Emily Zhao; Jian Lin Chen; Zhi Chen; Zhou Jiang;
and Jun Chen, Case No. 1:16-cv-03634 (D.N.J., June 21, 2016), is
brought against the Defendants for failure to pay minimum wage and
overtime compensation for all hours worked over 40 each work week.

The Defendants own and operate a Chinese restaurant located at
399 Zion Road, Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08234.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Lina Franco, Esq.
      LINA FRANCO LAW, P.C.
      42 Broadway, Suite 12-126
      New York, NY 10004
      Telephone: (800) 933-5620
      E-mail: Lina@LinaFranco.com

         - and -

      John Troy, Esq.
      TROY LAW, PLLC
      41-25 Kissena Boulevard, Suite 119
      Flushing, NY 11355
      Telephone: (718) 762-1324
      Facsimile: (718) 762-1342
      E-mail: troylaw@troypllc.com


BLUEGREEN VACATIONS: Faces "Miles" Suit in E.D. Cal.
----------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Bluegreen Vacations
Unlimited, Inc. The case is captioned Kyle Miles and Jasmine
Miles, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
the Plaintiffs, v. Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc., the
Defendant, Case No. 1:16-cv-00937-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal., June 28,
2016). The assigned Chief Judge is Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill.

Bluegreen Vacations manages and markets a flexible, point-based,
deeded vacation ownership (timeshare) program.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
          324 S. Beverly Dr., No. 725
          Beverly Hills, CA 90212
          Telephone: (877) 206 4741
          Facsimile: (866) 633 0228
          E-mail: tfriedman@attorneysforconsumers.com


BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces "Howley" Suit Over Pradaxa(R) Drugs
---------------------------------------------------------------
Louise Howley v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and
Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH, Case No. HHD-CV-16-
6069207-S (Conn. Super. Ct., June 21, 2016), is an action for
damages suffered by the Plaintiff as a proximate result of the
Defendant's alleged negligent and wrongful conduct in connection
with the design, testing, and labeling, of Pradaxa(R).

Pradaxa (R) is a direct thrombin inhibitor that is indicated to
reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with
non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

The Defendants operate a pharmaceutical company with principal
place of business at 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield, Connecticut
06877.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Neal L. Moskow, Esq.
      URY & MOSKOW, LLC
      833 Black Rock Turnpike
      Fairfield, CT 06825
      Telephone: (203) 610-6393
      Facsimile: (203) 610-6399
      E-mail: neal@urymoskow.com

         - and -

      Russell T. Abney, Esq.
      FERRER, POIROT WANSBROUGH FELLER DANIEL ABNEY & LINVILLE
      2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 720
      Atlanta, GA 30328
      Telephone: (800) 521-4492
      Facsimile: 214-526-6026
      E-mail: rabney@lawyerworks.com


BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces "Weymans" Suit Over Pradaxa(R) Drugs
----------------------------------------------------------------
Barbara Weymans v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and
Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH, Case No. HHD-CV-16-
6069206-S (Conn. Super. Ct., June 21, 2016), is an action for
damages suffered by the Plaintiff as a proximate result of the
Defendant's alleged negligent and wrongful conduct in connection
with the design, testing, and labeling, of Pradaxa(R).

Pradaxa (R) is a direct thrombin inhibitor that is indicated to
reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with
non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

The Defendants operate a pharmaceutical company with principal
place of business at 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield, Connecticut
06877.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Neal L. Moskow, Esq.
      URY & MOSKOW, LLC
      833 Black Rock Turnpike
      Fairfield, CT 06825
      Telephone: (203) 610-6393
      Facsimile: (203) 610-6399
      E-mail: neal@urymoskow.com


BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces "Blessman" Suit Over Pradaxa(R) Drug
----------------------------------------------------------------
Connie Blessman v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and
Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH, Case No. HHD-CV-16-
6069142-S (Conn. Super. Ct., June 17, 2016), is an action for
damages suffered by the Plaintiff as a proximate result of the
Defendant's alleged negligent and wrongful conduct in connection
with the design, testing, and labeling, of Pradaxa(R).

Pradaxa (R) is a direct thrombin inhibitor that is indicated to
reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with
non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

The Defendants operate a pharmaceutical company with principal
place of business at 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield, Connecticut
06877.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Neal L. Moskow, Esq.
      URY & MOSKOW, LLC
      833 Black Rock Turnpike
      Fairfield, CT 06825
      Telephone: (203) 610-6393
      Facsimile: (203) 610-6399
      E-mail: neal@urymoskow.com

         - and -

      Russell T. Abney, Esq.
      FERRER, POIROT WANSBROUGH FELLER DANIEL ABNEY & LINVILLE
      2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 720
      Atlanta, GA 30328
      Telephone: (800) 521-4492
      Facsimile: 214-526-6026
      E-mail: rabney@lawyerworks.com


BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces "Kerby" Suit Over Pradaxa(R) Drugs
--------------------------------------------------------------
Barbara Kerby v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and
Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH, Case No. HHD-CV-16-
6069141-S (Conn. Super. Ct., June 17, 2016), is an action for
damages suffered by the Plaintiff as a proximate result of the
Defendant's alleged negligent and wrongful conduct in connection
with the design, testing, and labeling, of Pradaxa(R).

Pradaxa (R) is a direct thrombin inhibitor that is indicated to
reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with
non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

The Defendants operate a pharmaceutical company with principal
place of business at 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield, Connecticut
06877.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Neal L. Moskow, Esq.
      URY & MOSKOW, LLC
      833 Black Rock Turnpike
      Fairfield, CT 06825
      Telephone: (203) 610-6393
      Facsimile: (203) 610-6399
      E-mail: neal@urymoskow.com

         - and -

      Russell T. Abney, Esq.
      FERRER, POIROT WANSBROUGH FELLER DANIEL ABNEY & LINVILLE
      2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 720
      Atlanta, GA 30328
      Telephone: (800) 521-4492
      Facsimile: 214-526-6026
      E-mail: rabney@lawyerworks.com


BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces "McNulty" Suit Over Pradaxa(R) Drugs
----------------------------------------------------------------
William McNulty v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and
Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH, Case No. HHD-CV-16-
6069143-S (Conn. Super. Ct., June 17, 2016), is an action for
damages suffered by the Plaintiff as a proximate result of the
Defendant's alleged negligent and wrongful conduct in connection
with the design, testing, and labeling, of Pradaxa(R).

Pradaxa (R) is a direct thrombin inhibitor that is indicated to
reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with
non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

The Defendants operates a pharmaceutical company with principal
place of business at 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield, Connecticut
06877.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Neal L. Moskow, Esq.
      URY & MOSKOW, LLC
      833 Black Rock Turnpike
      Fairfield, CT 06825
      Telephone: (203) 610-6393
      Facsimile: (203) 610-6399
      E-mail: neal@urymoskow.com

         - and -

      Russell T. Abney, Esq.
      FERRER, POIROT WANSBROUGH FELLER DANIEL ABNEY & LINVILLE
      2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 720
      Atlanta, GA 30328
      Telephone: (800) 521-4492
      Facsimile: 214-526-6026
      E-mail: rabney@lawyerworks.com


BOOMTOWN ENTERTAINMENT: Judge Barrett Certified Opt-In Class
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Judge Michael R. Barrett entered an order in the class
action lawsuit styled STEPHANIE TURECKY, individually, and on
behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BOOMTOWN
ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, et al., the Defendants, Case No. 1:15-cv-
00527-MRB (S.D. Ohio, June 29, 2016), granting Plaintiff's motion
for conditional certification of the proposed Opt-In Class, and
approval of the Proposed Notice to potential Opt-In Plaintiffs.

This Opt-in Class is conditionally certified:

     "All non-exempt persons who worked at the Cincinnati Toby
      Keith's restaurant during the pay period ending on July 16,
      2015."

Plaintiff's proposed Judicial Notice is timely, accurate and
informative, and is therefore approved for distribution to members
of the Opt-In Class, the Court said.

Judicial notice shall be disseminated to the employee via e-mail
when possible, in addition to regular U.S. mail. Putative members
of the Opt-In Class shall have a 90-day notice period to opt in to
the class. Within 14 days of the entry of this Order, the
Defendant Capri shall produce to Plaintiff a list of the full
name, last known mailing address(es), last known personal e-mail
address(es), dates of employment and wages earned during the pay
period ending July 16, 2015.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=YE6tTrrC


BOSELLI & SONS: Sued Over Failure to Provide Meal and Rest Breaks
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tomasz Sobolewski, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated
persons v. Boselli & Sons, LLC and Boselli Investments LLC, and
James J. Boselli, Don A. Boselli, Stephen M. Boselli and Francis
A. Boselli, Case No. 1:16-cv-01573 (D. Colo., June 21, 2016), is
brought against the Defendants for failure to ensure that
employees received meal and rest breaks during their shifts and
deducting time from employee pay for breaks that never were taken.

The Defendants operate a chain of McDonald's restaurants in
Colorado.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Brian D. Gonzales, Esq.
      THE LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN D. GONZALES, PLLC
      242 Linden Street
      Fort Collins, CO  80524
      Telephone: (970) 214-0562
      Facsimile: (303) 539-9812
      E-mail: BGonzales@ColoradoWageLaw.com


BRANNONS SANDWICH: Elfoulki Files Appeal From S.D.N.Y. Ruling
-------------------------------------------------------------
Khalid Elfoulki, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly-
situated, Alexander Todd Coleman, Michael J. Borrelli and Borrelli
& Associates, P.L.L.C., filed an appeal from a court ruling
relating to the lawsuit styled Elfoulki, et al. v. Brannons
Sandwich Shop, LLC, et al., Case No. 14-cv-5964, in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York
City).

As reported in the Class Action Reporter, the Plaintiffs accused
the Defendants of violating the minimum wage provisions of the
Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law.

The appellate case is captioned as Elfoulki v. Brannons Sandwich
Shop, LLC, Case No. 16-2336, in the United States Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit.

The other Plaintiffs are Ketevan Chichinadze, Katarina Tomkava,
Natalie Concepcion, Jhonatan Herrera, Melissa Rhyne, Michael
Manjon and Imam Hossen.

The Plaintiffs-Appellants are represented by:

          Alexander Todd Coleman, Esq.
          BORRELLI & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C.
          1010 Northern Boulevard, Suite 328
          Great Neck, NY 11021
          Telephone: (516) 248-5550
          Facsimile: (516) 248-6027
          E-mail: atc@employmentlawyernewyork.com

Defendants-Appellees Brannons Sandwich Shop, LLC, AKA Brannons;
Anemacore, LLC, DBA Donatella's; Ronald Brannon, in their
individual and professional capacities; and Donatella Arpaia, in
their individual and professional capacities, are represented by:

          Jesse Curtis Rose, Esq.
          THE ROSE LAW GROUP, PLLC
          3109 Newtown Avenue
          Astoria, NY 11102
          Telephone: (718) 989-1864


BUCKLES & BUCKLES: Van Hoven Seeks Certification of Class
---------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit styled MAUREEN VAN HOVEN, the
Plaintiff, v. BUCKLES & BUCKLES, P.L.C., ATTORNEYS AT LAW et al.,
the Defendant, Case No. 1:14-cv-00060-RJJ (W.D. Mich., June 29,
2016), asks the Court grant her motion and certify case as a class
action.

The Plaintiff proposes the following class:

     "A class comprises all judgment debtors who were subject to
      a Michigan garnishment that: (1) was signed by Buckles &
      Buckles, P.L.C.; (2) was filed during the class period; and
      (3) had included in the amount of the unsatisfied judgment
      then due (a) the costs of that garnishment, or (b) the
      costs of a prior garnishment before Buckles & Buckles,
      P.L.C. had received either

         i. a disclosure for the prior garnishment indicating
            the garnishee owed money to, held property of, or
            employed the judgment debtor, or

        ii. actual payment on the prior garnishment from the
            garnishee Buckles & Buckles is a consumer debt
            collection firm."

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=1myr4jvX

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Phillip C. Rogers, Esq.
          40 Pearl Street, N.W., Suite 336
          Grand Rapids, MI 49503-3026
          Telephone: (616) 776 1176
          E-mail: ConsumerLawyer@aol.com

               - and -

          Michael O. Nelson
          1104 Fuller N.E.
          Grand Rapids, MI 49503
          Telephone (616) 559-2665
          E-mail: mike@mnelsonlaw.com


CALLSMART INC: Status Hearing Set for August 30 in "Dolemba" Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois made a docket entry on July 7, 2016, in the case entitled
Scott Dolemba v. CallSmart, Inc., Case No. 1:16-cv-04863 (N.D.
Ill.), relating to a hearing held before the Honorable Jorge L.
Alonso.

The minute entry states that:

   -- status hearing was held and is continued to August 30,
      2016, at 9:30 a.m.;

   -- the Defendant's counsel failed to appear.  The Court
      ordered that counsel for all parties must be present at all
      status hearings;

   -- the Plaintiff's motion for class certification is entered
      and continued to August 30, 2016, at 9:30 a.m.; and

   -- the Parties' Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures must be served by
      August 17.

A copy of the Notification of Docket Entry is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=dVY3waIa


CAR GUYS: "Tundis" Suit Seeks Compensatory Damages Under FLSA
-------------------------------------------------------------
WENDY TUNDIS, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated,
the Plaintiff, v. CAR GUYS AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, a Florida corporation,
the Defendant, Case No. 5:16-cv-00410-JSM-PRL (Fla. Cir. Ct., June
22, 2016), seeks to recover compensatory and liquidated damages,
attorney fees, and other relief from Defendant for breach of
contract and violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The Plaintiff worked for Defendant as an hourly employee who
earned $10 per hour. The Defendant automatically deducts 30-minute
meal breaks from its employee pay whether they work through their
meal break or not. The Defendant also manipulated the hours of its
employees, including Plaintiff, to avoid paying them overtime.

Car Guys owns and operates multiple auto body repair shops in
North-Central Florida.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Matthew W. Birk
          THE LAW OF MATTHEW BIRK
          309 NE 1st Street
          Gainsville, FL 32601
          Telephone: (352) 244 2069
          Facsimile: (372) 3464
          E-mail: mbirk@gainsvilleemployeelaw.com


CAREFIRST INC: Chambliss Appeals D. Md. Ruling to 4th Circuit
-------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs-Appellants Pamela Chambliss and Scott Adamson filed an
appeal from a court ruling in the lawsuit titled Pamela Chambliss,
et al. v. CareFirst, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-02288-RDB, in
the United States District Court for the District of Maryland at
Baltimore.

As reported in the Class Action Reporter, District Judge Richard
D. Bennett granted the Defendants' motion to dismiss the Case.
The Plaintiffs brought the putative class action against the
Defendants alleging various tort, negligence, and statutory claims
arising under Maryland law.  Specifically, the Plaintiffs allege
that the Defendants failed to secure adequately the computer
hardware storing their customers' personal information, including
names, birth dates, email addresses, and subscriber identification
numbers.

In his Memorandum Opinion dated May 27, 2016 available at
https://is.gd/W1zSHu from Leagle.com, Judge Bennett held that
Plaintiffs have failed to allege sufficient facts to show that the
future harm from the CareFirst data breach is "certainly
impending" or that there is "a substantial risk that the harm will
occur" and that Plaintiffs have not alleged any benefit-of-the-
bargain loss that could constitute a cognizable injury in fact.

The appellate case is captioned as Pamela Chambliss v. CareFirst,
Inc., Case No. 16-1737, in the United States Court of Appeals for
the Fourth Circuit.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Pamela Chambliss and Scott Adamson,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, are
represented by:

          William B. Federman, Esq.
          Joshua D. Wells, Esq.
          FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD
          10205 North Pennsylvania
          Oklahoma City, OK 73120
          Telephone: (405) 235-1560
          Facsimile: (405) 239-2112
          E-mail: wbf@federmanlaw.com
                  jdw@federmanlaw.com

               - and -

          Price Owen Gielen, Esq.
          NEUBERGER, QUINN, GIELEN, RUBIN & GIBBER, PA
          Commerce Place
          1 South Street
          Baltimore, MD 21202-0000
          Telephone: (410) 332-8584
          E-mail: pog@nqgrg.com

Defendants-Appellees CAREFIRST, INCORPORATED, a Maryland
Corporation, and CAREFIRST OF MARYLAND, INCORPORATED, a Maryland
Corporation, are represented by:

          Gerin Brendan Ballard, Esq.
          Matthew Gatewood, Esq.
          SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN, LLP
          700 6th Street, NW
          Washington, DC 20001
          Telephone: (202) 383-0820
          E-mail: gerin.ballard@sutherland.com
                  matt.gatewood@sutherland.com


CAREVANTAGE MEDICAL: "Fuentes" Class Suit Removed to S.D. Florida
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit captioned Emma Fuentes and other
similarly situated individuals v. CareVantage Medical Centers of
Miami at Hialeah, LLC d/b/a CareVantage and Alberto LaMadrid, Case
No. 16-012458-CA-01, was removed from the 11th Judicial Circuit in
and for Miami-Dade County to the U.S. District Court
Southern District of Florida (Miami). The District Court Clerk
assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-22362-KMW to the proceeding.

The case alleges violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

CareVantage Medical Centers of Miami at Hialeah, LLC operates a
medical center located at 4445 W 16th Ave #501, Hialeah, FL 33012.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Anthony Maximillien Georges-Pierre, Esq.
      REMER & GEORGES-PIERRE, PLLC
      Court House Tower
      44 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
      Miami, FL 33130
      Telephone: (305) 416-5000
      Facsimile: (305) 416-5005
      E-mail: agp@rgpattorneys.com

The Defendant is represented by:

      Lisa Michelle Kohring, Esq.
      SCHWARZBERG & ASSOCIATES, PL
      222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 210
      West Palm Beach, FL 33401
      Telephone: (561) 659-3300
      E-mail: lkohring@schwarzberglaw.com

         - and -

      Steven Leo Schwarzberg, Esq.
      SCHWARZBERG & ASSOCIATES
      625 North Flagler Drive, Suite 600
      West Palm Beach, FL 33401
      Telephone: (561) 659-3300
      Facsimile: (561) 693-4540
      E-mail: steve@schwarzberglaw.com


CELATOR PHARMACEUTICALS: Sued Over Proposed Jazz Pharma Merger
--------------------------------------------------------------
Harry Dunbar, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Celator Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Michael R. Dougherty,
Scott T. Jackson, Joseph A. Mollica, Jeanpierre Bizzari, Richard
S. Kollender, Joseph M. Lobacki, Scott Morenstein, Nicole Vitullo,
Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLC, and Plex Merger Sub, Inc., Case No. L-
001251-16 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 21, 2016), is brought on behalf
of all public stockholders of Celator Phannaceuticals, Inc., to
enjoin the proposed transaction pursuant to which Celator will be
acquired by Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc, through a flawed process and
inadequate consideration.

Celator Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a clinical-stage
biopharmaceutical company located at 200 Princeton South Corporate
Center, Suite 180, Ewing, New Jersey 08628.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc is a biopharmaceutical company which
specializes in identifying, developing and commercializing
pharmaceutical products.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Joseph J. De Palma, Esq.
      Bruce D. Greenberg, Esq.
      LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG, LLC
      570 Broad Street, Suite 1201
      Newark, NJ 07102
      Telephone: (973) 623-3000
      E-mail: jdepalma@litedepalma.com
              bgreenberg@litedepalma.com


CELATOR PHARMACEUTICALS: Faces "Barreto" Suit Over Jazz Merger
--------------------------------------------------------------
JORGE L. BARRETO, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly
Situated, Plaintiff, v. CELATOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MICHAEL R.
DOUGHERTY, SCOTT JACKSON, JOSEPH A. MOLLICA, JEANPIERRE BIZZARI,
RICHARD S. KOLLENDER, JOSEPH M. LOBACKI, SCOTT MORENSTEIN, and
NICOLE VITULLO, Defendants, Case 3:16-cv-03866 (D.N.J., June 29,
2016), seeks to enjoin the acquisition of Celator by Jazz
Pharmaceuticals plc.

CELATOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. is a clinical-stage
biopharmaceutical company.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Donald J. Enright, Esq.
     LEVI & KORSINSKY LLP
     235 Main Street
     Hackensack, NJ 07601
     Phone: (973) 265-1600


CENTRAL REFRIGERATED: Renewed Motion to Certify Class Due Sep. 12
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Virginia A. Phillips entered an order in the class action
lawsuit captioned ROBIN ANDERSON -v- CENTRAL REFRIGERATED SERVICE,
INC., A NEBRASKA CORPORATION; AND DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE, Case No.
5:14-cv-02062-VAP-SP (C.D. Cal., June 29, 2016), directing
Plaintiff to file a renewed motion to certify class no later than
September 12, 2016, or the parties are to appear on September 19
at 1:30 p.m. for a scheduling conference.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=pri4CSTI

Robin Anderson is represented by Daniel John Turner --
dturner@vtzlaw.com -- Jennifer S Grock and Brian F Van Vleck --
bvanvleck@vtzlaw.com -- Van Vleck Turner and Zaller LLP.

Defendants Central Refrigerated Service, LLC, and Swift
Transportation Company are represented by Christopher J Eckhart
-- ceckhart@scopelitis.com -- Christopher Chad McNatt, Jr --
cmcnatt@scopelitis.com -- James H Hanson -- jhanson@scopelitis.com
-- and Kathryne S Feary-Gardner -- Kfeary-gardner@scopelitis.com
-- at Scopelitis Garvin Light Hanson Feary PC.


CHANTICLEER HOLDINGS: Class Action Claim Forms Being Distributed
----------------------------------------------------------------
Chanticleer Holdings, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the parties in a class
action lawsuit are proceeding with distributing the claim forms
and notices of settlement to the class members and ultimately will
disburse settlement payments to those who opt in.

Prior to the Company's acquisition of Little Big Burger, a class
action lawsuit was filed in Oregon by certain current and former
employees of Little Big Burger asserting that the former owners of
Little Big Burger failed to compensate employees for overtime
hours and also that an employee had been wrongfully terminated.
The plaintiffs and defendants agreed to enter into a settlement
agreement pursuant to which the former owners of Little Big Burger
will pay a gross settlement of up to $675,000, inclusive of
plaintiffs' attorney's fees of $225,000. This settlement was
preliminarily approved by the court on February 2, 2016.

The parties are proceeding with distributing the claim forms and
notices of settlement to the class members and ultimately will
disburse settlement payments to those who opt in.

The Company said, "In connection with our acquisition of Little
Big Burger, the sellers agreed that the 1,619,646 shares of the
Company's common stock certain of the sellers received from the
Company and an additional $200,000 in cash would be held in escrow
until such time as the litigation was fully resolved. The Company
does not expect that it will be required to expend any funds
related to the settlement as certain of the Sellers have agreed to
retain the obligations and have set aside sufficient funds to
cover the settlement. However, as the Company assumed all
liabilities of Little Big Burger in the acquisition and would be
required to fulfill the settlement if the sellers were unable or
otherwise failed to fully fund the settlement, the Company has
reflected the $675,000 settlement amount in accrued liabilities,
with an offsetting asset in other current assets, in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2015."

Chanticleer Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (together, the
"Company") are in the business of owning, operating and
franchising fast casual dining concepts domestically and
internationally.


CHAPARRAL ENERGY: Still Defending Naylor Farms Suit
---------------------------------------------------
Chaparral Energy, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the Company is
vigorously defending the case, Naylor Farms, Inc., individually
and as class representative on behalf of all similarly situated
persons v. Chaparral Energy, L.L.C.

The Company said, "On June 7, 2011, an alleged class action was
filed against us in the United States District Court for the
Western District of Oklahoma ("Naylor Farms Case") alleging that
we improperly deducted post-production costs from royalties paid
to plaintiffs and other royalty interest owners as categorized in
the petition from crude oil and natural gas wells located in
Oklahoma. The purported class includes non-governmental royalty
interest owners in oil and natural gas wells we operate in
Oklahoma. The plaintiffs have alleged a number of claims,
including breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty,
unjust enrichment, and other claims and seek termination of
leases, recovery of compensatory damages, interest, punitive
damages and attorney fees on behalf of the alleged class. We have
responded to the Naylor Farms petition, denied the allegations and
raised arguments and defenses. The class has not been certified,
but the motion for class certification and responsive briefs were
filed in the fourth quarter of 2015. The court has not ruled on
the motion and no hearing has been scheduled. We are not currently
able to estimate a reasonably possible loss or range of loss or
what impact, if any, the Naylor Farms Case will have on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows due to
the preliminary status of the matters, the complexity and number
of legal and factual issues presented by the matter and
uncertainties with respect to, among other things, the nature of
the claims and defenses, the potential size of the class, the
scope and types of the properties and agreements involved, and the
ultimate potential outcome of the matter. Plaintiffs in the Naylor
Farms Case have indicated, if the class is certified, they seek
damages in excess of $5,000,000 which may increase with the
passage of time, a majority of which would be comprised of
interest. We dispute plaintiffs' claims, dispute that the case
meets the requirements for a class action and are vigorously
defending the case."


CHAPARRAL ENERGY: "Dodgson" Class Suit Pending in Oklahoma
----------------------------------------------------------
Chaparral Energy, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the Company has
responded to the petition, denied the allegations and raised a
number of affirmative defenses, in the case, Amanda Dodson,
individually and as class representative on behalf of all
similarly situated persons v. Chaparral Energy, L.L.C.

The Company said, "On May 10, 2013, Amanda Dodson, filed a
complaint against us in the District Court of Mayes County,
Oklahoma, ("Dodson Case") with allegation similar to those
asserted in the Naylor Farms case related to post-production
deductions, and include clams for breach of contract, fraud,
breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and other claims and
seek termination of leases, recovery of compensatory damages,
interest, punitive damages and attorney fees on behalf of the
alleged class. The alleged class includes non-governmental royalty
interest owners in oil and natural gas wells we operate in
Oklahoma. We have responded to the Dodson petition, denied the
allegations and raised a number of affirmative defenses."

"At this time, a class has not been certified and discovery has
not yet commenced. We are not currently able to estimate a
reasonable possible loss or range of loss or what impact, if any,
the Dodson Case will have on its financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows due to the preliminary status of the
matters, the complexity and number of legal and factual issues
presented by the matter and uncertainties with respect to, among
other things, the nature of the claims and defenses, the potential
size of the class, the scope and types of the properties and
agreements involved, and the ultimate potential outcome of the
matter. We dispute plaintiffs' claims, dispute that the case meets
the requirements for a class action and are vigorously defending
the case.|


CHAPARRAL ENERGY: Donelson-Friend Suit Pending in Oklahoma
----------------------------------------------------------
Chaparral Energy, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the Company continues
to defend against the case, Martha Donelson and John Friend, on
behalf of themselves and on behalf of all similarly situated
persons v. Chaparral Energy, L.L.C.

The Company said, "On August 11, 2014, an alleged class action was
filed against us, as well as several other operators in Osage
County, in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Oklahoma, alleging claims on behalf of the named
plaintiffs and all similarly situated Osage County land owners and
surface lessees. The plaintiffs challenged leases and drilling
permits approved by the Bureau of Indian Affairs without the
environmental studies required under the National Environmental
Protection (NEPA). Plaintiffs assert claims seeking recovery for
trespass, nuisance, negligence and unjust enrichment. Relief
sought includes declaring oil and natural gas leases and drilling
permits obtained in Osage County without a prior NEPA study void
ab initio, removing us from all properties owned by the class
members, disgorgement of profits, and compensatory and punitive
damages. On March 31, 2016, the Court dismissed the case against
the federal agencies named as defendants, and therefore against
all defendants, as an improper challenge under NEPA and the
Administrative Procedures Act.

"On April 29, 2016, the plaintiffs filed a motion to alter or
amend the court's opinion and vacate the judgment, arguing the
court does have jurisdiction to hear the claims and dismissal of
the federal defendants does not require dismissal of the oil
company defendants.  Plaintiffs also filed a motion to file an
amended complaint to cure the deficiencies which the court found
in the dismissed complaint.

"The Company has not yet responded to these motions, and the court
has not yet ruled. As such, we are not yet able to estimate a
possible loss, or range of possible loss, if any. We dispute
plaintiffs' claims, dispute that the case meets the requirements
for a class action and are vigorously defending the case."


CHAPARRAL ENERGY: Dismissal of West-Hopson Action Sought
--------------------------------------------------------
Chaparral Energy, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the Company has filed
motion to dismiss the case, Lisa West and Stormy Hopson,
individually and as class representatives on behalf of all
similarly situated persons v. Chaparral Energy, L.L.C.

The Company said, "On February 18, 2016, an alleged class action
was filed against us, as well as several other operators in the
District Court of Pottawatomie County, State of Oklahoma ("West
Case"), alleging claims on behalf of named plaintiffs and all
similarly situated persons having an insurable real property
interest in Cleveland, Lincoln, McClain, Okfuskee, Oklahoma,
Pontotoc, Pottawatomie and Seminole Counties, Oklahoma (the "Class
Area"). The plaintiffs allege the oil and gas operations conducted
by us and the other defendants have induced or triggered
earthquakes in the Class Area. The plaintiffs are asking the court
to require the defendants to reimburse plaintiffs and class
members for earthquake insurance premiums from 2011 through a
future date defined as the time at which the court determines
there is no longer a risk that our activities induce or trigger
earthquakes, as well as attorney fees and costs and other relief.
The plaintiffs have not asked for damages related to actual
property damage which may have occurred. We have responded to the
petition, denied the allegations and raised a number of
affirmative defenses. At this time, a class has not been certified
and discovery has not yet commenced.

"On March 18, 2016 the case was removed to the United States
District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma under the
Class Action Fairness Act, but plaintiffs moved to remand the
matter to the Pottawatomie County court.

"We and other defendants have filed motions to dismiss the West
Case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted, and other grounds. We are
not currently able to estimate a reasonable possible loss or range
of loss or what impact, if any, the West Case will have on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows due to
the preliminary status of the matters, the complexity and number
of legal and factual issues presented, and uncertainties with
respect to, among other things, the nature of the claims and
defenses, the potential size of the class, the scope and types of
the properties and agreements involved, and the ultimate potential
outcome of the matter. We dispute plaintiffs' claims, dispute that
the case meets the requirements for a class action, dispute the
remedies requested are available under Oklahoma law, and are
vigorously defending the case."


COTY INC: "Blank" Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages Under Labor Code
----------------------------------------------------------
DAVE BLANK, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. COTY, INC., a New York
Corporation, and DOES 1-100, the Defendants, Case No. BC624850
(Cal. Super. Ct., June 22, 2016), seeks to recover unpaid wages
and penalties, declaratory relief and restitution under California
Business and Professions Code, the Labor Code, and the Industrial
Welfare Commission Wage Order.

The Plaintiff has worked for Defendants as a non-exempt employee
since approximately November 5, 2012. The Plaintiffs job duties
include manufacturing nail products as well as general maintenance
at Defendants' North Hollywood, California facility.
During Plaintiffs employment with Defendants, Plaintiff routinely
worked in excess of eight hours per workday and/or more than forty
hours per workweek, but does not receive overtime

Coty is an American beauty products manufacturer based in New York
founded in Paris, France, by Fran‡ois Coty in 1904.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Paul K. Haines, Esq.
          Tuvia Korobkin, Esq.
          Fletcher W. Schmidt, Esq.
          Andrew J. Rowbotham, Esq.
          HAINES LAW GROUP, APC
          2274 East Maple Ave.
          El Segundo, CA 90245
          Telephone: (424) 292 2350
          Facsimile: (424) 292 2355
          E-mail: phaines@haineslawgroup.com
                  tkorobkin@haineslawgroup.com
                  fschmidt@haineslawgroup.com
                  arowbotham@haineslawgroup.com


CRESCENT CITY CONSULTING: Court Certifies FLSA Class
----------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Judge Susie Morgan entered an order in the class action
lawsuit styled CHARLES KOVIACH, ET AL., the Plaintiffs, v.
CRESCENT CITY CONSULTING, LLC, ET AL., the Defendants, Case No.
2:14-cv-02874-SM-KWR (E.D. La, June 29, 2016), granting
Plaintiffs' motion to conditionally certify a collective action
under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The Court conditionally certifies this matter as a collective
action with respect to all non-law enforcement personnel, who,
since December 2011, previously worked or currently work for
Defendants in the State of Louisiana as a security officer (guard)
and were not paid a rate of time and one-half for overtime worked
in excess of 40 hours in any week, regardless of classification as
an independent contractor.

The Court further ordered that:

     1. Plaintiffs file a revised notice form and a revised opt-
        in consent form in accordance with this order by July 7,
        2016.

     2. Defendants produce to Plaintiffs a computer-readable
        database with the names, last-known mailing addresses,
        e-mail addresses, and telephone numbers of all potential
        class members by July 13, 2016.

     3. Class members seeking to opt in to this case will have
        120 days from the date on which the notice and consent
        forms are mailed to postmark their consent forms in order
        to opt in.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=jGbP6Pxi


DESCARTES FINANCIAL: Escobar Seeks Earned Wages Under Labor Code
----------------------------------------------------------------
ABRAHAM ESCOBAR, an individual, on behalf ofhimse1f and others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. DESCARTES FINANCIAL
CORPORATION., a California corporation; and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
the Defendants, Case No. BC624722 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 22,
2016), seeks judgment against the Defendant pursuant to California
Labor Code, specifically, for payment of earned wages, overtime
and minimum wage compensation, and other damages according to
proof in an amount to be ascertained at trial, among other things.

Defendant hired Plaintiff as the resident manager for the property
located at 3923 Gibraltar in Los Angeles, California. In exchange
for a one-half reduction in Plaintiffs rent, Plaintiff worked
approximately 15-20 hours per week managing the property. At no
time during his employment did Defendant keep track of Plaintiff's
hours worked for any pay period nor did it furnish him with
accurate itemized wage statements as required by law.

Descartes Financial is a property management firm, serving Los
Angeles and nearby communities.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Aryeh Leichter, Esq.
     LEICHTER LAW FIRM, APC
     3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1745
     Los Angeles, CA 90010
     Telephone: (213) 381 6557
     Facsimile: (888) 801 6657
     Email: ari@leiclh.terlawfirm.com


DOORSTEP DELIVERY: Sued in M.D. Florida Over Automated Calls
------------------------------------------------------------
LC Technology International, Inc., individually and as the
representative of a class of similarly-situated persons v.
Doorstep Delivery.net, Inc., Case No. 6:16-cv-01071-CEM-DAB (M.D.
Fla., June 21, 2016), seeks to stop the Defendants' practice of
using an artificial and prerecorded voice to deliver a message
without prior express consent of the called party.

Doorstep Delivery.net, Inc. is a restaurant marketing company that
also coordinates delivery for restaurants that do not offer
delivery in several cities in the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Stefan Coleman, Esq.
      LAW OFFICES OF STEFAN COLEMAN, PLLC
      28th Floor, 201 S Biscayne Blvd
      Miami, FL 33131
      Telephone: (877) 333-9427
      Facsimile: (888) 498-9827
      E-mail: law@stefancoleman.com

DISPATCH TAXI: Faces "Dominguez" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
------------------------------------------------------------
Miguel Dominguez and Jose Arce, individually and on behalf of all
similarly situated persons v. Dispatch Taxi Affiliation, Inc.,
Chitown Taxi Brokerage, LLC, Dispatch Affiliation, LLC, Dispatch
Taxi Management, LLC, Extreme Taxi Auto Repair Shop, LLC, Lake
Repair and Meter Shop, LLC, Total Taxi Repair and Body Shop, LLC,
Windy City Meter Shop, LLC, Savas Tsitiridis, and Evgeny A.
Freidman, Case No. 1:16-cv-06325 (N.D. Ill., June 17, 2016), is
brought against the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages
in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendants own and operate a taxi cab service in Chicago,
Illinois.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Robin Potter, Esq.
      M. Nieves Bolanos, Esq.
      Patrick Cowlin, Esq.
      ROBIN POTTER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
      111 East Wacker Drive - Suite 2600
      Chicago, IL  60601
      Telephone: (312) 861-1800
      E-mail: robin@potterlaw.org
              nieves@potterlaw.org
              patrick@potterlaw.org


DVE MANAGEMENT: Faces "Harris" Suit Alleging Violation of FLSA
--------------------------------------------------------------
RICHARD HARRIS, JR., individually and on behalf of all persons
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DVE MANAGEMENT, INC. d/b/a ONE
SOURCE ENERGY SERVICES Defendant, Case 7:16-cv-00254 (W.D. Tex.,
June 29, 2016), seeks all available relief under the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Defendant DVE Management, Inc. d/b/a One Source Energy Services
("DVE") is a corporation providing third party services to the oil
and gas industry, including flowback, well testing management, and
rental equipment services throughout the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     HUGHES ELLZEY, LLP
     W. Craft Hughes, Esq.
     Jarrett L. Ellzey, Esq.
     HUGHES ELLZEY, LLP
     2700 Post Oak Blvd., Ste. 1120
     Galleria Tower I
     Houston, TX 77056
     Phone: (713) 554-2377
     Fax: (888) 995-3335
     E-mail: craft@hughesellzey.com
             jarrett@hughesellzey.com

        - and -

     Shanon J. Carson, Esq.
     Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen, Esq.
     Alexandra K. Piazza, Esq.
     Camille Fundora, Esq.
     BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C.
     1622 Locust Street
     Philadelphia, PA 19103
     Phone: (215) 875-3000
     Fax: (215) 875-4604
     E-mail: scarson@bm.net
             sschalman-bergen@bm.net
             apiazza@bm.net
             cfundora@bm.net


EDGEWELL PERSONAL: Faces "Birmingham" Suit in C.D. Cal.
-------------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Edgewell Personal
Care Company. The case is captioned Laurel Birmingham,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, the
Plaintiff, v. Edgewell Personal Care Company, Edgewell Personal
Care Brands, LLC, and Edgewell Personal Care, LLC, the Defendants,
Case No. 2:16-cv-04707-SJO-PLA (C.D. Cal., June 28, 2016). The
assigned Judge is Hon. S. James Otero.

Edgewell Personal is an American consumer products company based
in St Louis, Missouri.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Betsy C Manifold, Esq.
          Brittany DeJong, Esq.
          Rachele R Rickert, Esq.
          WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER
          FREEMAN AND HERZ LLP
          750 B Street Suite 2770
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 239 4599
          Facsimile: (619) 234 4599
          E-mail: manifold@whafh.com
                  dejong@whafh.com
                  rickert@whafh.com


EIGER BIOPHARMACEUTICALS: Seeks Dismissal of Securities Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------------
Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the defendants,
including Eiger, filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated
amendment complaint.

In July 2015, three putative securities class action complaints
(captioned Fialkov v. Celladon Corporation, Case No. 15-cv-1458-
AJB-DHB, Lorusso v. Celladon Corporation, Case No. 15-cv-1501-L-
JLB and Jacobs v. Celladon Corporation, Case No. 15-cv-1529-AJB-
MDD) were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of California against Celladon and certain of Celladon's
current and former officers. The complaints generally allege that
the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, by making
materially false and misleading statements regarding the clinical
trial program for MYDICAR, thereby artificially inflating the
price of Celladon's common stock. The complaints seek unspecified
monetary damages and other relief, including attorneys' fees.

On September 1, 2015, six stockholders (or groups of stockholders)
filed motions to consolidate the three putative securities class
actions and to appoint lead plaintiffs (the "Motions to
Consolidate"). A hearing on the Motions to Consolidate was held on
December 3, 2015. On December 9, 2015, the Court consolidated the
three putative securities class actions and appointed a lead
plaintiff to represent the putative class.

The lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint on
February 29, 2016. On April 29, 2016, the defendants, including
Eiger, filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amendment
complaint.

The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends
to defend these lawsuits vigorously. Due to the early stage of
these proceedings, the Company is not able to predict or
reasonably estimate the ultimate outcome or possible losses
relating to these claims.

Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Inc. is a clinical-stage
biopharmaceutical company committed to bringing to market novel
products for the treatment of orphan diseases.


EMERY WILSON: Seeks Review of Ruling in "Meinders" Class Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Emery Wilson Corporation, doing business as Sterling
Management Systems, filed an appeal from a court ruling in the
lawsuit entitled Robert L. Meinders v. The Emery Wilson
Corporation, Case No. 3:14-cv-00596-SMY-SCW, in the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

The lawsuit is brought over alleged violations of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act for sending unsolicited faxes.

The appellate case is captioned as The Emery Wilson Corporation v.
Robert Meinders, Case No. 16-8009, in the US Court of Appeals for
the Seventh Circuit.

Petitioner The Emery Wilson Corporation is represented by:

          Ana Tagvoryan, Esq.
          Kenneth S. Meyers, Esq.
          BLANK ROME LLP
          2029 Century Park East
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (424) 239-3400
          E-mail: ATagvoryan@BlankRome.com
                  KMeyers@BlankRome.com

               - and -

          Jeffrey N. Rosenthal, Esq.
          BLANK ROME LLP
          130 N. 18th Street
          One Logan Square
          Philadelphia, PA 19103-0000
          Telephone: (215) 569-5553
          E-mail: Rosenthal-J@BlankRome.com

               - and -

          Jeanne M. Zeiger, Esq.
          Jeffrey A. Siderius, Esq.
          CRAY HUBER HORSTMAN HEIL & VANAUSDAL LLC
          303 W. Madison Street
          Chicago, IL 60606-0000
          Telephone: (312) 332-8493
          Facsimile: (312) 332-8451
          E-mail: jmz@crayhuber.com
                  jas@crayhuber.com

Respondent Robert L. Meinders, Doctor, individually and as the
representative of a class of similarly situated persons, is
represented by:

          Phillip A. Bock, Esq.
          BOCK, HATCH, LEWIS & OPPENHEIM, LLC
          134 N. LaSalle Street
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 658-5501
          E-mail: phil@classlawyers.com

               - and -

          Robert J. Sprague, Esq.
          SPRAGUE & URBAN
          26 E. Washington Street
          Belleville, IL 62220-2101
          Telephone: (618) 233-8383
          Facsimile: (618) 233-5374
          E-mail: rsprague@spragueurban.com


EXPANSION CAPITAL: Kristensen Seeks Certification of Classes
------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. John Kristensen in the class action lawsuit styled JOHN
KRISTENSEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY
SITUATED, the Plaintiff, v. EXPANSION CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, the
Defendant, Case No. 2:16-cv-00982-JFW-JEM (C.D. Cal., June 29,
2016), moves the Court for an order granting Plaintiff's Motion
for Class Certification against the Defendant concerning
violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The Plaintiff moves the Court to certify these classes consisting
of:

     "All persons within the United States who received any
      telephone calls from Defendant or its agent/s and/or
      employee/s to said person's cellular telephone made through
      the use of any automatic telephone dialing system within
      the four years prior to the filling of the Complaint; and

      All persons in California whose inbound and outbound
      cellular telephone conversation were recorded without their
      consent by Defendant or Defendant's agent/s within one year
      prior to the filing of the original Complaint in this
      action."

The Plaintiff also moves the Court for his appointment as Class
Representative, and for appointment of Plaintiff's attorneys as
Class Counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=t8W1qV8p

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          G. Thomas Martin, III, Esq.
          Nicholas J. Bontrager, Esq.
          MARTIN & BONTRAGER, APC
          6464 W. Sunset Blvd., Ste. 960
          Los Angeles, CA 90028
          Telephone: (323) 940 1700
          Facsimile: (323) 238 8095
          E-mail: Tom@mblawapc.com
                  Nick@mblawapc.com


FORD MOTOR: Motion to Dismiss "Anderson" Suit Under Advisement
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the class action lawsuit styled Danielle Anderson, et al., the
Plaintiff, v. Ford Motor Company, the Defendant, Case No. 1:16-cv-
01632 (N.D. Ill., June 29, 2016), the Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo ruled
that:

      1. the Defendant's motion for leave to file excess pages
         is granted;

      2. the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is taken under
         advisement.

      3. the Plaintiff's Motion to certify class is moot.

The Plaintiff is ordered to respond to the Motion to Dismiss by
July 21, 2016. Ruling before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo is on
August 31, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.  Scheduling Conference date of July
14, 2016 and report of parties planning submission date of July
12, 2016 are stricken pending disposition of the motion to
dismiss.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Jwb5J8ey


FORMULA SYSTEMS: Court Partially Approved Agreement
---------------------------------------------------
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. said in its Form 20-F Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the court has
partially approved an agreement between the parties for payment of
fees and reimbursement of expenses and attorneys' fees.

On September 10, 2014, a motion for certification of a class
action (together with a statement of claim) was filed by an
alleged shareholder of Formula's subsidiary Matrix against Matrix
and Matrix's directors and chief executive officer, and against
Formula, as Matrix's controlling shareholder. The motion included
a claim for damages caused, according to the alleged shareholder,
to the shareholders of Matrix as a result of the publication of
financial statements that included misleading information, which,
according to the applicant, have a significant impact on Matrix's
results of operations, a breach of the duty of disclosure under
Israeli securities laws and negligent supervision over the
financial statements, based on reports regarding the correction of
errors discovered in the financial statements of Matrix.

On January 13, 2015, the applicant filed an amended request, which
included, among other things, a financial expert opinion and an
increase to the amount of the claim in accordance with the above
request, with the losses to the applicant estimated to be NIS 0.2
million and the losses of the entire group estimated to be NIS
41.0 million (approximately $10.5 million).

On January 26, 2016, a ruling of the court confirming the agreed
withdrawal request which was submitted in October 2015, rejecting
the plaintiff's personal claim, and ordered to delete the entire
certificate request. The court also partially approved the
agreement between the parties for payment of fees and
reimbursement of expenses and attorneys' fees. The amounts are
immaterial for the Company.


GOOGLE INC: Fillekes Seeks Certification of Opt-in FLSA Class
-------------------------------------------------------------
Cheryl Fillekes in the class action lawsuit captioned ROBERT
HEATH, and CHERYL FILLEKES, the Plaintiffs, on behalf of
themselves and others similarly situated, the Plaintiffs, v.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, the Defendant, Case No. 5:15-
cv-01824-BLF (N.D. Cal., June 29, 2016), moves the Court to
conditionally certify an opt-in Fair Labor Standards Act
collective action of certain applicants age 40 and older who
allegedly were discriminated against by the Defendant in violation
of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

Google does not consent to Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional
Certification. The Plaintiff requests that the motion be decided
without oral argument.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=TE1eIucE

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Daniel L. Low, Esq.
          Daniel Kotchen, Esq.
          KOTCHEN & LOW LLP
          1745 Kalorama Road NW, Suite 101
          Washington, DC 20009
          Telephone: (202) 471 1995
          Facsimile: (202) 280 1128
          E-mail: dlow@kotchen.com
                  dkotchen@kotchen.com


GRAY & GRAY: Yarbrough Seeks Certification of Class & Subclass
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff moves for an order certifying the case titled MARY
YARBROUGH, the Plaintiff, v. GRAY & GRAY, P.C. et al., the
Defendants, Case No. 1:14-cv-00234-RJJ (W.D. Mich., June 29,
2016), as a class action lawsuit.

Plaintiff proposes two classes:

     "A General Class comprise all judgment debtors who were
      subject to a Michigan garnishment that: (1) was signed by
      Gray & Gray, P.C.; (2) was filed during the class period;
      and (3) had included in the amount of the unsatisfied
      judgment then due (a) the costs of that garnishment, or
      (b) the costs of a prior garnishment before Gray & Gray,
      P.C. had received either (i) a disclosure for the prior
      garnishment indicating the garnishee owed money to, held
      property of, or employed the judgment debtor, or (ii)
      actual payment on the prior garnishment from the
      garnishee."

     "A DLG Subclass comprises all judgment debtors who were
      subject to a Michigan garnishment that: (1) was signed by
      Gray & Gray, P.C. to collect a judgment payable to DLG &
      Associates, Inc., (2) was filed during the class period;
      and (3) had included in the amount of the unsatisfied
      judgment then due (a) the costs of that garnishment, or
      (b) the costs of a prior garnishment before Gray & Gray,
      P.C. had received either (i) a disclosure for the prior
      garnishment indicating the garnishee owed money to, held
      property of, or employed the judgment debtor, or (ii)
      actual payment on the prior garnishment from the
      garnishee."

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=h2sHXPwq

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Phillip C. Rogers, Esq.
          40 Pearl Street, N.W., Suite 336
          Grand Rapids, MI 49503-3026
          Telephone: (616) 776 1176
          E-mail: ConsumerLawyer@aol.com

               - and -

          Michael O. Nelson, Esq.
          1104 Fuller N.E.
          Grand Rapids, MI 49503
          Telephone: (616) 559 2665
          E-mail: mike@mnelsonlaw.com


HANSEN MEDICAL: Request to Dismiss Stevens-Juhl Action Pending
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hansen Medical, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that a California Court has
not yet acted on a request by the plaintiff in the Stevens-Juhl
action requested that the California Court dismiss her complaint
without prejudice.

Between April 25, 2016 and May 6, 2016, four putative class action
lawsuits were filed in the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of Santa Clara (the "California Court") against
the Company, its directors, Auris, and Sub in connection with the
proposed Merger.  The lawsuits are captioned Joseph Liu v. Hansen
Medical, Inc., et al., 16CV294288 (April 25, 2016), Dawn Stevens-
Juhl v. Hansen Medical, Inc., et al., 16CV294354 (April 26, 2016),
Howard Huggins v. Hansen Medical, Inc., et al., 16CV294552 (May 2,
2016) and David Simonson v. Cary G. Vance, et al., 16CV294862 (May
6, 2016) (naming the Company's directors, Auris, and Sub as
defendants).

On May 12, 2016, the plaintiff in the Stevens-Juhl action
requested that the California Court dismiss her complaint without
prejudice. The California Court has not yet acted on that request.

These lawsuits each allege that the Company's directors breached
their fiduciary duties to Company stockholders by, among other
things, seeking to sell the Company through an allegedly unfair
process, for an unfair price, and on unfair terms.  The lawsuits
also allege that Auris and Sub aided and abetted those alleged
breaches of fiduciary duties.  The lawsuits seek, among other
things, equitable relief that would enjoin the consummation of the
proposed Merger, rescission of the Merger Agreement (to the extent
it has already been implemented) or rescissory damages, and
attorneys' fees and costs.

The Liu and Simonson actions additionally seek an order directing
the Company's directors to exercise their fiduciary duties to
obtain a transaction that is in the best interests of the
Company's stockholders and the imposition of a constructive trust,
in favor of the plaintiff and the class, upon any benefits
improperly received by defendants as a result of their alleged
wrongdoing.  The Stevens-Juhl and Huggins actions additionally
seek an accounting for any damages suffered by the plaintiff and
the class as a result of the defendants' alleged wrongdoing.

Hansen Medical, Inc. (the "Company") develops, manufactures,
markets and sells a new generation of medical robotics designed
for accurate positioning, manipulation and stable control of
catheters and catheter-based technologies.


HANSEN MEDICAL: Windward Venture Files Class Action
---------------------------------------------------
Hansen Medical, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that a putative class
action was filed on May 10, 2016 in the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware against the Company, its directors, twelve
entities that are Company stockholders along with two individuals
that allegedly control some of those entities (the "Stockholder
Defendants"), Auris, and Sub. The lawsuit is captioned Windward
Venture Partners, LP v. Hansen Medical, Inc., et al., Civil Action
No. 12316 (the "Delaware Action").

The Delaware Action alleges that the Company's directors breached
their fiduciary duties to Company stockholders by, among other
things, seeking to sell the Company through an allegedly unfair
process, for an unfair price, and on unfair terms.  The lawsuit
also alleges that the Stockholder Defendants were controlling
stockholders of the Company and breached fiduciary duties they
owed to the Company's other stockholders by, among other things,
causing the Company to engage in an unfair transaction to the
benefit of the Stockholder Defendants. Auris and Sub are alleged
to have aided and abetted these breaches of fiduciary duties. The
Delaware Action seeks equitable relief that would enjoin the
consummation of the proposed Merger, rescission of the Merger
Agreement (to the extent it has already been implemented) or
rescissory damages, an accounting for any damages suffered by the
plaintiff and the class as a result of the defendants' alleged
wrongdoing, and attorneys' fees and costs.

Hansen Medical, Inc. (the "Company") develops, manufactures,
markets and sells a new generation of medical robotics designed
for accurate positioning, manipulation and stable control of
catheters and catheter-based technologies.


HOBART SERVICE: Seeks Review of Ruling in "Alcantar" Class Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
Defendants Hobart Service and ITW Food Equipment Group, LLC, filed
an appeal from a court ruling relating to the lawsuit titled
Joseluis Alcantar v. Hobart Service, et al., Case No. 5:11-cv-
01600-PSG-SP, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District
of California, Riverside.

As reported by the Class Action Reporter, the Hon. Philip S.
Gutierrez entered an order in the lawsuit styled Joseluis
Alcantar, the Plaintiff v. Hobart Service, et al., the Defendant,
Case No. 5:11-cv-01600-PSG-SP (C.D. Cal.), granting Plaintiff's
motion for class certification.

Plaintiff sought to certify a class of Defendant's service
technicians who were not properly paid for their commutes to and
from work. Specifically, Plaintiff alleged that Hobart's policies
required service technicians to drive their work vehicles (which
contained all of their work equipment and tools) home each night,
and restricted their conduct while driving these vehicles, but
only paid them if their commutes lasted longer than their "normal
commute time," in violation of California's labor laws.

The Court also appoints Joseluis Alcantar as class representative
and Workman Law Firm, P.C. as class counsel, and approves the
Proposed Notice (subject to the required alteration).

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Av3OauU9

The appellate case is captioned as Joseluis Alcantar v. Hobart
Service, et al., Case No. 16-80088, in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Plaintiff-Respondent Joseluis Alcantar, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated, is represented by:

          Walter L. Haines, Esq.
          UNITED EMPLOYEES LAW GROUP, PC
          5500 Bolsa Ave.
          Huntington Beach, CA 92649
          Telephone: (562) 256-1047
          E-mail: walter@whaines.com

               - and -

          Aviva N. Roller, Esq.
          Robin G. Workman, Esq.
          WORKMAN LAW FIRM, PC
          177 Post Street, Suite 900
          San Francisco, CA 94108
          Telephone: (415) 782-3660
          E-mail: aviva@workmanlawpc.com
                  robin@workmanlawpc.com

Defendants-Petitioners Hobart Service and ITW Food Equipment
Group, LLC, are represented by:

          Raymond A. Cardozo, Esq.
          Brian Adair Sutherland, Esq.
          REED SMITH LLP
          101 Second Street
          San Francisco, CA 94105
          Telephone: (415) 543-8700
          E-mail: rcardozo@reedsmith.com
                  bsutherland@reedsmith.com

               - and -

          Mara D. Curtis, Esq.
          Thomas E. Hill, Esq.
          REED SMITH LLP
          355 South Grand Avenue
          Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514
          Telephone: (213) 457-8000
          E-mail: mmatheke@reedsmith.com
                  thill@reedsmith.com


HOUSE OF TOMORROW: Scams Texas Homeowners, "Guerra" Suit Claims
---------------------------------------------------------------
JUAN GUERRA v. JORGE GARCIA, VIVIAN ARMAS, SARA ROGERS, STEVEN
ROGERS, HOUSE OF TOMORROW, INC., HOUSE OF TOMORROW THR, LLC,
LAMBCORP EM LLC, LAMBCORP LLC, NATIONAL CLAIMS NEGOTIATORS LLC,
SANDRA HARRISON, W. LEE CALHOUN, CODY ROBINSON, JASON SPEIGHTS,
SPEIGHTS & WORRICH, SPEIGHTS LAW FIRM, LLP, and WORRICH LAW FIRM,
PLLC, Case No. DC-16-07967, in the Texas District Court, Dallas
County, 162nd District Court, accuses the Defendants of
perpetrating an elaborate web of fraud, barratry, breaches of
fiduciary duty, conversion, systemic dishonesty, and conspiracy
not only on the Plaintiff but undoubtedly on thousands of others.

The Defendants are day roofers, public adjusters, and Texas
lawyers.

Mr. Guerra is a Texas homeowner who lives in Dallas County.  He
alleges that the Defendants, under the guise of assisting
homeowners with property damage claims -- particularly roof
claims, have devised and operated a scheme -- conspiracy -- to
line their pockets at the expense of their own customers and
clients -- Texas citizens like him.  He also alleges that the
Defendants seek to perpetrate an image of helping Texas homeowners
with property damage claims when in fact they have set up a scam
using Texas insurance policyholders as pawns to make themselves
rich at the expense of Texas homeowners.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mark A. Ticer, Esq.
          Jennifer W. Johnson, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF MARK A. TICER
          10440 N. Central Expressway, Suite 600
          Dallas, TX 75204
          Telephone: (214) 219-4220
          Facsimile: (214) 219-4218
          E-mail: mticer@ticerlaw.com
                  jjohnson@ticerlaw.com

               - and -

          Evan Lane, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF VAN SHAW
          2723 Fairmount
          Dallas, TX 75201
          Telephone: (214) 754-7110
          Facsimile: (214) 754-7115
          E-mail: van@shawlaw.net

               - and -

          Naval H. Patel, Esq.
          PATEL LAW, PLLC
          580 Decker Dr., Suite 150
          Irving, TX 75062
          Telephone: (214) 810-3120
          Facsimile: (214) 722-6809
          E-mail: np@patelpllc.com


INDUSTRIAL SPECIALISTS: Sued Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
---------------------------------------------------------------
Hassan Pourshahidi, on behalf of himself and all other similarly
situated v. Industrial Specialists of California, Inc., Brand
Energy Services of California, Inc., Brand Energy & Infrastructure
Holdings, Inc., Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services, Inc., and
Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Case No. BC624467 (Cal. Super. Ct., June
17, 2016), is brought against the Defendants for failure to pay
overtime wages in violation of the California Labor Code.

The Defendants operate industrial buildings and warehouses located
in Long Beach, California.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Paul K. Haines, Esq.
      Tuvia Korobkin, Esq.
      Fletcher W. Schmidt, Esq.
      Andrew J. Rowbotham, Esq.
      HAINES LAW GROUP, APC
      2274 East Maple Ave.
      El Segundo, CA 90245
      Telephone: (424) 292-2350
      Facsimile: (424) 292-2355
      E-mail: phaines@haineslawgroup.com
              tkorobkin@haineslawgroup.com
              fschmidt@haineslawgroup.com
              arowbotham@haineslawgroup.com


INTEGRA PROPERTY: Faces "Murray" Suit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
---------------------------------------------------------------
RAYMOND MURRAY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, vs. INTEGRA PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC and
RICHARD FITCH, individually, Defendants, Case 0:16-cv-61532-BB
(S.D. Fla., June 29, 2016), seeks to recover money damages for
alleged unpaid overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards
Act.

Integra Property Services provide a range of business mentoring
and consulting, project managing, copywriting, marketing and
outsourced social media services to the property industry.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Jonathan S. Minick, Esq.
     JONATHAN S. MINICK, P.A.
     1850 SW 8th Street, Suite 307
     Miami, FL 33135
     Phone: (786) 441-8909
     Fax: (786) 523-0610
     E-mail: jminick@jsmlawpa.com


INTOUCH MOBILE: Faces "Gutierrez" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
-------------------------------------------------------------
Daigoro Gutierrez and Claudia Urias, on behalf of themselves, on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. Intouch Mobile/Atlas,
Inc. and Does 1-100, Case No. BC624693 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 21,
2016), is brought against the Defendants for failure to pay
overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Intouch Mobile/Atlas, Inc. owns, operates and manages multiple
retail stores in California doing business as InTouch Mobile.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Zachary Cantor, Esq.
      CANTOR LAW
      1112 Montana Avenue, Ste. C
      Santa Monica, CA 90403
      Telephone: (310) 393-6620
      Facsimile: (310)393-6680
      E-mail: info@cantorlawyers.com

         - and -

      Rodney Mesriani, Esq.
      MESRIANI LAW GROUP
      5723 Melrose Ave, Ste. 202
      Los Angeles, CA 90038
      Telephone: (310)826-6300
      Facsimile: (310)820-1258


JBS CARRIERS: Faces "Ryan" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Ryan, individually and on behalf of those similarly
situated v. JBS Carriers, Inc., and Does 1 -50, inclusive, Case
No. BC624401 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 17, 2016), is brought against
the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of
the California Labor Code.

JBS Carriers, Inc. operates a meat transportation company in
Greeley, Colorado.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jonathan Melmed, Esq.
      MELMED LAW GROUP P.C.
      1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 610
      Los Angeles, CA 90035
      Telephone: (310) 824-3828
      Facsimile: (310) 862-6851
      E-mail: jm@melmedlaw.com

         - and -

      James M. Lee, Esq.
      Caleb H. Liang, Esq.
      LTL ATTORNEYS LLP
      601 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3900
      Los Angeles, CA 90017
      Telephone: (213) 612-8900
      Facsimile: (213)612-3773
      E-mail: james.lee@ltlattorneys.com
              caleb.liang@ltlattorneys.com


KBR INC: Faces "Ruiz" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------
Marissa Ruiz, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated v. KBR, Inc., Agrium Nitrogen Company and Agrium U. S.
Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-00123-J (N.D. Tex., June 21, 2016), is
brought against the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages
for work in excess forty hours per week.

The Defendants own and operate an engineering company located at
1999 Bryan Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas 75201.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jeremi K. Young, Esq.
      Collin J. Wynne, Esq.
      YOUNG & NEWSOM, P.C.
      1001 S. Harrison St., Suite 200
      Amarillo, TX 79101
      Telephone: (806) 331-1800
      Facsimile: (806) 398-9095
      E-mail: jyoung@youngfirm.com
              tim@youngfirm.com
              collin@youngfirm.com

         - and -

      Jeremi K. Young, Esq.
      Greg Freeman, Esq.
      FREEMAN, WILCOX & NANCE, LLC
      2403 Line Avenue
      Amarillo, TX 79106
      Telephone: (806) 372-7700
      Facsimile: (806) 373-4068
      E-mail: freeman@lawyersamarillo.com


LEASE SUPERVISORS: Faces "Mallory" Suit Alleging ERISA Violation
----------------------------------------------------------------
DON MALLORY on behalf of himself and a class of persons similarly
situated, Plaintiff, vs. LEASE SUPERVISORS, LLC and O'RYAN
COMPANIES BENEFIT PLAN - LEASE SUPERVISORS, Defendant, Case 7:16-
cv-00248 (W.D. Tex., June 29, 2016), alleges violation of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

Lease Supervisors is a defined contribution plan with a profit-
sharing component and 401k feature.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     William S. Hommel, Jr., Esq.
     HOMMEL LAW FIRM
     1404 Rice Road, Suite 200
     Tyler, TX 75703
     Phone: 903-596-7100
     Fax: 469-533-1618


LEIKIN & INGBER: Walker Seeks Certification of Class & Subclass
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff moves for an order certifying the lawsuit styled
ETHEL WALKER, the Plaintiff, v. LEIKIN, INGBER & WINTERS, P.C. et
al., the Defendants, Case No. 1:14-cv-00018-RJJ (W.D. Mich., June
29, 2016), as a class action.

The Plaintiff proposes two classes:

     "A General Class comprises all judgment debtors who were
      subject to a Michigan garnishment that: (1) was signed by
      Leikin, Ingber & Winters, P.C.; (2) was filed during the
      class period; and (3) had included in the amount of the
      unsatisfied judgment then due (a) the costs of that
      garnishment, or (b) the costs of a prior garnishment before
      Leikin, Ingber & Winters, P.C. had received either (i) a
      disclosure for the prior garnishment indicating the
      garnishee owed money to, held property of, or employed the
      judgment debtor, or (ii) actual payment on the prior
      garnishment from the garnishee."

     "A LVNV Subclass comprises all judgment debtors who were
      subject to a Michigan garnishment that: (1) was signed by
      Leikin, Ingber & Winters, P.C. to collect a judgment
      payable to LVNV Funding, LLC, (2) was filed during the
      class period; and (3) had included in the amount of the
      unsatisfied judgment then due (a) the costs of that
      garnishment, or (b) the costs of a prior garnishment before
      Leikin, Ingber & Winters, P.C. had received either (i) a
      disclosure for the prior garnishment indicating the
      garnishee owed money to, held property of, or employed the
      judgment debtor, or (ii) actual payment on the prior
      garnishment from the garnishee."

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=7obylH9k

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Phillip C. Rogers, Esq.
          40 Pearl Street, N.W., Suite 336
          Grand Rapids, MI 49503-3026
          Telephone:(616) 776 1176
          E-mail: ConsumerLawyer@aol.com

               - and -

          Michael O. Nelson, Esq.
          1104 Fuller N.E.
          Grand Rapids, MI 49503
          Telephone: (616) 559 2665
          E-mail: mike@mnelsonlaw.com


LIVHOME INC: Does Not Properly Pay Employees, "Bonner" Suit Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lori Bonner, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Livhome, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Case
No. BC624347 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 17, 2016), is brought against
the Defendants for failure to authorize and permit rest periods,
failure to pay overtime wages, failure to timely pay all wages to
terminated employees, and failure to furnish accurate wage
statements.

Livhome, Inc. provides at-home care to seniors through LivHome
Caregivers.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Farzad Rastegar, Esq.
      Justin F. Marquez, Esq.
      RASTEGAR LAW GROUP, APC
      22760 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 200
      Torrance, CA 90505
      Telephone: (310) 961-9600
      Facsimile: (310) 961-9094
      E-mail: farzad@rastegarlawgroup.com
              justin@rastegarlawgroup.com


MANASSEH JORDAN: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, "Carcelen" Suit Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jorge Carcelen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Manasseh Jordan Ministries and Does 1 through 10, Case
No. 5:16-cv-01318-FMO-JC (C.D. Cal., June 21, 2016), seeks to stop
the Defendants' practice of using an artificial and prerecorded
voice to deliver a message without prior express consent of the
called party.

Manasseh Jordan Ministries is a Christian minister currently based
in Boston.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Adrian Robert Bacon, Esq.
      Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
      LAW OFFICES OF TODD FRIEDMAN PC
      324 South Beverly Drive Suite 725
      Beverly Hills, CA 90212
      Telephone: (877) 206-4741
      Facsimile: (866) 633-0228
      E-mail: abacon@toddflaw.com
              tfriedman@toddflaw.com


MCDONALD'S CORP: California Court Certifies Class in "Ochoa" Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. James Donato granted in part and denied in part a motion
for class certification filed by Plaintiffs Stephanie Ochoa,
Ernestina Sandoval, Yadira Rodriguez, and Jasmine Hedgepeth in the
lawsuit captioned STEPHANIE OCHOA, et al. v. MCDONALD'S CORP., et
al., Case No. 3:14-cv-02098-JD (N.D. Cal.).

In their action, the Plaintiffs seek to certify a class of all
current and former employees at the Smiths' restaurants, who
worked as crew, crew trainers, or maintenance workers and were
paid on an hourly basis from four years before the complaint to
final judgment or settlement.  The Plaintiffs move for
certification of that single Class to pursue claims for: (1)
miscalculated wages; (2) overtime; (3) meals and rest breaks; (4)
maintenance of uniforms; (5) wage statements; and (6) related
derivative claims.

Under Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
Court certifies the proposed Class for plaintiffs' miscalculated
wages claims, overtime claims and maintenance-of-uniform claims,
and any claims that are derivative of those claims.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=A0V1eNjk


MCLEOD EXPRESS: Downs Seeks Certification of FLSA Class
-------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit styled MICHELLE D. DOWNS, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v.
MCLEOD EXPRESS LLC, and MARK R. MCLEOD, an individual, the
Defendants, Case No. 2:16-cv-02060-HAB (C.D. Ill., June 29, 2016),
moves the Court for an order:

     1. granting conditional certification of a Fair Labor
        Standards Act collective action;

     2. directing Defendants to provide to Plaintiff's counsel a
        list of the names and last known addresses of each
        individual they employed as a driver within the City
        Division to transport corn meal and corn germ at ADM in
        Decatur, Illinois, at any time during the period
        beginning March 8, 2013, and ending March 8, 2016; and

     3. approving the form of notice.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=R04HLaZZ

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          James A. Devine, Esq.
          JAMES A. DEVINE, ATTORNEY AT LAW
          607 East Adams, Suite 1510
          Springfield, IL 62701
          Telephone: (217) 788 0798
          Facsimile: (217) 788 1660
          E-mail: jamesalbertdevine@gmail.com

               - and -

          John A. Baker, Esq.
          BAKER, BAKER & KRAJEWSKI, LLC
          415 South Seventh Street
          Springfield, IL 62701
          Telephone: (217) 522 3445
          Facsimile: (217) 522 8234
          E-mail: jab@bbklegal.com


MELITTA USA: Decerbo Seeks Certification of Class in M.D. Fla.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jill Decerbo moves the Court for an order requesting that her
claims asserted in the lawsuit styled JILL DECERBO, on Behalf of
Herself and all Others Similarly Situated, and the General Public
v. MELITTA USA, INC., Case No. 8:16-cv-00850-EAK-AAS (M.D. Fla.),
be maintained as a class action.

Ms. Decerbo also asks the Court to name her as class
representative, to appoint the Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron and
the Cullin O'Brien Law, P.A., and its individual attorneys, as
class counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=wGHaSpkN

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ronald A. Marron, Esq.
          Michael Houchin, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON
          651 Arroyo Drive
          San Diego, CA 92103
          Telephone: (619) 696-9006
          Facsimile: (619) 564-6665
          E-mail: ron@consumersadvocates.com
                  mike@consumersadvocates.com

               - and -

          Cullin O'Brien, Esq.
          CULLIN O'BRIEN LAW, P.A.
          6541 NE 21 St Way,
          Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308
          Telephone: (561) 676-6370
          Facsimile: (561) 320-0285
          E-mail: cullin@cullinobrienlaw.com

               - and -

          David Elliot, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID ELLIOT
          2028 3rd Avenue
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (858) 228-7997
          E-mail: elliot.david@hotmail.com


MERIDIAN FINANCIAL: Appeal Filed in "Saulsberry" Class Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff Arnold Saulsberry filed an appeal from a court ruling
entered in the lawsuit styled Arnold Saulsberry v. Meridian
Financial Services Inc., Case No. 2:14-cv-06256-JGB-JPR, in the
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles.

The appellate case is captioned as Arnold Saulsberry v. Meridian
Financial Services Inc., Case No. 16-55952, in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Plaintiff-Appellant Arnold Saulsberry, Individually and on Behalf
of All Others Similarly Situated, is represented by:

          Asaf Agazanof, Esq.
          ASAF LAW APC
          8730 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 310
          Beverly Hills, CA 90211
          Telephone: (424) 254-8870
          Facsimile: (888) 254-0651
          E-mail: asaf@lawasaf.com

               - and -

          Adrian Robert Bacon, Esq.
          STRANGE & CARPENTER
          12100 Wilshire Boulevard
          Los Angeles, CA 90025
          Telephone: (480) 200-2764
          E-mail: adrianbacon@gmail.com

               - and -

          Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN
          324 S. Beverly Drive
          Beverly Hills, CA 90212
          Telephone: (877) 206-4741
          Facsimile: (866) 633-0228
          E-mail: tfriedman@attorneysforconsumers.com

Defendant-Appellee Meridian Financial Services, Inc., is
represented by:

          Andrew M. Steinheimer, Esq.
          Ephraim Egan, Esq.
          ELLIS LAW GROUP, LLP
          740 University Avenue
          Sacramento, CA 95825
          Telephone: (916) 283-8820
          Facsimile: (916) 283-8821
          E-mail: ASteinheimer@Ellislawgrp.com


MIDLAND CREDIT: Illegally Collects Debt, "Abergel" Suit Claims
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ehud Abergel, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. a/k/a Midland Funding,
LLC, Case No. 1:16-cv-03354 (E.D.N.Y., June 21, 2016), seeks to
stop the Defendant's unfair and unconscionable means to collect a
debt.

Midland Credit Management, Inc. operates a debt collection company
headquartered at 3111 Camino Del Rio N #1300, San Diego, CA 92108.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Alan J. Sasson, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF ALAN J. SASSON, P.C.
      2687 Coney Island Avenue, 2nd Floor
      Brooklyn, NY 11235
      Telephone: (718) 339-0856
      Facsimile: (347) 244-7178
      E-mail: alan@sassonlaw.com


MOBILELINK VIRGINIA: Faces Va. Suit Alleging Violation of FLSA
--------------------------------------------------------------
JIMMY HENDRIX, 513TAFT DRIVE, PORTSMOUTH, VA 23701 and SEAN HAZER
3003 TRAIL BEND DRIVE, CHESAPEAKE, VA 23321, individually and on
hclmlf of all similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, V.
MOBILELINK VIRGINIA, LLC, Serve: Incorp Services, Inc., Registered
Agent, 7288 Hanover Green Drive, Mechanicsville, VA 23111,
MOBILELINK USA, Serve; Furqan Ken Khan, Director,
12501 Reed Road, Sugar Land, Texas 77478, CRICKET WIRELESS, LLC,
Serve: CT Corporation System, Registered Agent, 4701 Cox Road,
Suite 285, Glen Allen, VA 23060, and AT&T, INC., Serve: Randall L.
Stephenson, CEO, 208 S. Akard Street, Dallas, Texas 75202
Defendants, Case 2:16-cv-00394-MSD-RJK (E.D. Va., June 29, 2016),
seeks redress under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Defendant Mobilelink Virginia is a Virginia limited liability
company operating under Mobilelink USA which is a private Cricket
Wireless company providing cellular services and products to
consumers.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     James H. Shoemaker, Jr., Esq.
     Jason E. Messersmith, Esq.
     PATTEN, WORNOM, HATTEN& DIAMONSTEIN, L.C.
     12350 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 300
     NewportNews, VA 23602
     Phone: (757) 223-4580
     Fax: (757) 223-4518
     E-mail: Jshoemaker@pwhd.com
             jmessersmith@pwhd.com

        - and -

     Cindra Dowd, Esq.
     Richard J. Serpe, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD J. SERPE, P.C.
     Crown Center, Suite 310
     580 East Main Street
     Norfolk, VA 23510-2322
     Phone: (757) 233-0009
     Fax: (757) 233-0455
     E-mail: rserpe@serpefirm.com
             cdowd@serpefirm.com


NANTKWEST INC: To Defend Against Calif. Securities Class Action
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nantkwest, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that a securities class
action complaint was filed in March 2016 in federal district court
in California against the Company related to the recently
announced restatement of certain interim financial statements for
the periods ended June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015. The case,
Sudunagunta v. NantKwest, Inc., et al., is currently pending
before the United States District Court for the Central District
of California.

The complaint names the Company and certain of its current and
former officers and directors, as defendants. The complaint
alleges that the defendants misrepresented material facts and/or
mislead investors regarding the errors in the consolidated
financial statements related to stock-based awards to the chairman
and chief executive officer (CEO) and build-to-suit lease
accounting related to one of the Company's research and
development and good manufacturing practices facilities, and
regarding the lack of effective internal financial controls. The
complaint alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated
thereunder. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, costs and
attorneys' fees, and equitable/injunctive or other relief.

Management intends to vigorously defend these proceedings. At this
time, the Company cannot predict how the Court will rule on the
merits of the claims and/or the scope of the potential loss in the
event of an adverse outcome. Therefore, based on the information
available at present, the Company cannot reasonably estimate a
range of loss for this action.  Should the Company ultimately be
found liable, the liability could have a material adverse effect
on the Company's results of operations for the period or periods
in which it is incurred.

Nantkwest is a pioneering clinical-stage immunotherapy company
focused on harnessing the power of the innate immune system by
using the natural killer cell to treat cancer, infectious diseases
and inflammatory diseases.


NATIONAL STORES: Faces "Medellin" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
-------------------------------------------------------------
Alma G. Medellin, Cristina Casas, Josefina Cecena, Maria Gianola,
Maria Teresa Medina, Myra Carmona, and Valeria Langarica v.
National Stores, Inc., J & M Sales, Inc., FP Stores, Inc., Fallas,
Fallas Discount, Fallas Discount Stores, Fallas Paredes, Factory
2-U, Anna's Linens, Anna's Linens by Fallas, Fallas Management,
Inc., Fallas Capital Holdings, LLC, and Does 1 to 150, Case No.
BC624097 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 17, 2016), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime and minimum wages in
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendants own and operate discount department stores in
California.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Joseph Lavi, Esq.
      Joshua M. Webster, Esq.
      LAVI & EBRAHIMIAN, LLP
      8889 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 2200
      Beverly Hills, CA 90211
      Telephone: (310) 432-0000
      Facsimile: (310) 432-0001


NESTLE WATERS: Ortega Seeks Penalties & Wages Under Labor Code
--------------------------------------------------------------
RICARDO ORTEGA and CHRIS DAVIS, as aggrieved employees on behalf
of themselves and other current and former employees, the
Plaintiffs, v. NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC., an entity
unknown; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, the Defendants, Case No.
BC624726 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 22, 2016), seeks to judgment
against the Defendants for failing to: pay all meal period wages
and rest break wages, all overtime wages and minimum wages, all
vested vacation wages, including vacation equivalents; reimburse
all necessary work-related expenses; pay all wages due and owing
upon termination of employment; and provide accurate wage
statements.

Nestle Waters has 15 leading bottled water brands & offers bottled
water delivery service to homes & businesses across the U.S.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Kenneth H. Yoon, Esq.
          Stephanie E. Yasuda, Esq.
          Brian G. Lee, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH H. YOON
          One Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200
          Los Angeles, CA 90017
          Telephone: (213) 612 0988
          Facsimile: (213) 947 1211

               - and -

          Douglas Han, Esq.
          Shunt Tatavos-Gharajeh, Esq.
          Daniel J. Park, Esq.
          JUSTICE LAW CORPORATION
          411 North Central Avenue, Suite 500
          Glendale, CA 91203
          Telephone: (818) 230 7502
          Facsimile: (818) 230 7259

               - and -

          Emil Davtyan, Esq.
          DAVTYANPLC
          21900 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 300
          Woodland Hills, CA 91367
          Telephone: (818) 992 2935


NETFLIX INC: Faces "Keritsis" Lawsuit Alleging Breach of Contract
-----------------------------------------------------------------
GEORGE KERITSIS, individually and on behalf of all other persons
similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. NETFLIX, INC., Defendant, Case
3:16-cv-03675 (N.D. Cal., June 29, 2016), alleges that Netflix has
broken its contract of "guaranteeing that [it] would not increase
monthly subscription prices as long as the subscribers maintained
the subscription service continuously" by unilaterally raising
monthly subscription prices.

Netflix Inc. is a subscription service that provides subscribers
with access to motion pictures, television, and other audio-visual
entertainment streamed over the Internet to certain Internet-
connected TVs, computers, and other devices. Netflix charges
subscribers a monthly membership fee for the use of these
services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Robert C. Schubert, Esq.
     Noah M. Schubert, Esq.
     SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
     Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650
     San Francisco, CA 94111
     Phone: (415) 788-4220
     Fax: (415) 788-0161
     E-mail: rschubert@schubertlawfirm.com
             nschubert@schubertlawfirm.com

        - and -

     Thomas G. Shapiro, Esq.
     SHAPIRO HABER & URMY LLP
     Seaport East
     Two Seaport Lane
     Boston, MA 02210
     Phone: (617) 439-3939
     E-mail: tshapiro@shulaw.com


NTELOS HOLDINGS: Westen and Sekerak Class Actions Dismissed
-----------------------------------------------------------
NTELOS Holdings Corp. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that Mr. Marvin Westen and
Mr. Paul Sekerak, each filed on August 24, 2015, a purported class
action complaint relating to the Merger in the Court of Chancery
of the State of Delaware. These complaints were dismissed.


ORCHESTRATE HOSPITALITY: Edwards Seeks OK of $163,000 Settlement
----------------------------------------------------------------
Daryetta Edwards seeks preliminary approval of a proposed
$163,699.98 class action settlement reached on behalf of a class
in the lawsuit captioned DARYETTA EDWARDS, on behalf of and all
others similarly situated v. ORCHESTRATE HOSPITALITY GROUP,
L.L.C., et al., Case No. 4:16-cv-00063-JAJ-HCA (S.D. Iowa).

If approved by the Court, the Settlement would resolve all of the
pending claims in the proceeding, Ms. Edwards asserts.

Ms. Edwards and the Class worked for the Defendants as tipped
servers between February 12, 2014, and February 12, 2016.  The
Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants violated the Iowa Minimum
Wage Act and the Iowa Wage Payment Collection Law, along with the
Fair Labor Standards Act's minimum wage provisions by failing to
pay Plaintiffs regular minimum wages ($7.25/hour) for untipped
labor.  The Defendants deny the allegations and maintain that, at
all times, they paid the Plaintiffs in accordance with applicable
law and otherwise complied with applicable law.

Accordingly, Ms. Edwards asks the Court to:

   (1) grant preliminary approval of the proposed $163,699.98
       settlement, including the establishment of a settlement
       fund;

   (2) grant preliminary certification pursuant to the provisions
       of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of
       the class described herein for settlement purposes only;

   (3) authorize mailing of the class notice in a manner
       consistent with the Settlement;

   (4) schedule a final approval hearing; and

   (5) enter the proposed order for preliminary approval filed
       contemporaneously.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Ru5WWAFZ

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Harley C. Erbe, Esq.
          ERBE LAW FIRM
          2501 Grand Avenue
          Des Moines, IA 50312
          Telephone: (515) 281-1460
          Facsimile: (515) 281-1474
          E-mail: erbelawfirm@aol.com

               - and -

          Steven P. Wandro, Esq.
          WANDRO & ASSOCIATES
          2501 Grand Avenue
          Des Moines, IA 50312
          Telephone: (515) 281-1475
          Facsimile: (515) 281-1474
          E-mail: swandro@2501grand.com


PAYMENT DATA: Court Tossed Claims Against 2 Directors
-----------------------------------------------------
Payment Data Systems, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the Court has signed
an order dismissing the claims against Peter Kirby and Michael
Long, but did not rule as to the other defendants.

On June 26, 2015, Michael McFarland, derivatively on behalf the
Company, and individually on behalf of himself and all other
similarly situated shareholders of the Company, filed a class-
action lawsuit in United States District Court, District of
Nevada. The suit alleges breach of fiduciary duties and unjust
enrichment by the Company's Board of Directors and certain
executive officers and directors in connection with excessive and
unfair compensation paid or awarded during fiscal years 2013 and
2014. The lawsuit seeks disgorgement of excessive compensation as
well as damages in an unspecified amount.

As of March 17, 2016 the Court signed an order dismissing the
claims against Peter Kirby and Michael Long, but did not rule as
to the other defendants. The Company filed an unopposed motion for
final judgment as to everyone else and confirmed again with the
Plaintiff that they do not oppose dismissal of the whole case.


PAYMENT DATA: McFarland Refiled Class Action Lawsuit
----------------------------------------------------
Payment Data Systems, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that Michael McFarland,
derivatively on behalf the Company, re- filed the same class-
action lawsuit in United States District Court, District of
Nevada. The suit alleges breach of fiduciary duties and unjust
enrichment by the Company's Board of Directors and certain
executive officers and directors in connection with excessive and
unfair compensation paid or awarded during fiscal years 2013 and
2014. The lawsuit seeks disgorgement of excessive compensation as
well as damages in an unspecified amount.


PECO FOODS: Faces Alabama Lawsuit Alleging Violation of FLSA
------------------------------------------------------------
JIMMY R. NICKS and WILLIAM MCNEAL, individually and on behalf of
all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PECO FOODS, INC.,
and ARMCO SERVICES, INC., Defendants, Case 7:16-cv-01057-JHE (N.D.
Ala., June 29, 2016), seeks all available relief under the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Peco Foods, Inc. is an Alabama corporation headquartered in
Tuscaloosa, Alabama with processing plants, live operations
offices, feed mills, and hatcheries in Mississippi, Alabama, and
Arkansas.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     David A. Hughes, Esq.
     Nicole S. Hughes, Esq.
     HARDIN & HUGHES, LLP
     2121 14th Street
     Tuscaloosa, AL 35401
     Phone: (205) 344-6690
     Fax: (205) 344-6188
     E-mail: dhughes@hardinhughes.com
             nhughes@hardinhughes.com

        - and -

     Shanon J. Carson, ESq.
     Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen, Esq.
     Alexandra K. Piazza, Esq.
     Camille Fundora, Esq.
     BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C.
     1622 Locust Street
     Philadelphia, PA 19103
     Phone: (215) 875-3000
     Fax: (215) 875-4604
     E-mail: scarson@bm.net
             sschalman-bergen@bm.net
             apiazza@bm.net
             cfundora@bm.net


PENANG HOUSE: Faces "Wei" Class Suit Alleging Violations of FLSA
----------------------------------------------------------------
Jia Ren Wei, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v.
Penang House, Inc. d/b/a Pulau Pinang, WaWa San Inc. d/b/a Pulau
Pinang, Ah EngOoi, Teck Kong Lo, "John" Ma, ChiewszeCheah, Cindy
Cheah, Juan Lee Cheah, Kuokai Cheah, Chuen Leung, Min Soon Ling
and Chris Ooi, Case No. 1:16-cv-03712 (E.D.N.Y, July 4, 2016), is
brought over alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Penang House, Inc., is a New York domestic business corporation
located in Elmhurst, New York.  The Defendants operate Pulau
Pinang, a Malaysian restaurant.


PHARMAVITE LLC: Bid to Certify Class in "Bradach" Suit Denied
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable George H. King denied the Plaintiffs' renewed motion
for class certification in the Noah Bradach, et al. v. Pharmavite
LLC, Case No. Case No. CV 14-3218-GHK (AGRx) (C.D. Cal.).

According to the Court's civil minutes, Noah Bradach appears to
have asserted only preempted false disease claims.  Hence, Judge
King ordered him to show cause in writing, within 14 days hereof,
why his claims should not be dismissed as preempted.

Pharmavite LLC manufactures and distributes various dietary
supplements under the brand name "Nature Made," including vitamin
E supplements produced in multiple sizes and doses.  In their
Motion, the Plaintiffs sought to certify a class, to appoint Mr.
Bradach as class, and to appoint Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman &
Balint, P.C.; Boodell & Domanskis, LLC; and Goldman Scarlato &
Penny P.C., as class counsel.

A copy of the Civil Minutes is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=JtGBwW4P


PINCHER'S BEACH: Class of Servers Certified in "Campbell" Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. John E. Steele entered an opinion and order in the
lawsuit entitled KAREN CAMPBELL, on her behalf and on behalf of
those similarly situated v. PINCHER'S BEACH BAR GRILL INC., Case
No. 2:15-cv-00695-UA-MRM (M.D. Fla.), granting in part and denying
in part the Plaintiff's motion for an order permitting supervised
notice of the action to potential opt-in plaintiffs and
conditional certification of the case as a collective action.

Karen Campbell filed her complaint against her former employer,
Pinchers Beach Bar Grill, Inc., on her own behalf and on behalf of
other similarly situated individuals, for minimum wage and
overtime compensation relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Judge Steele granted conditional certification for the putative
class of individuals who (1) worked at defendant's Fort Myers
Beach (Tiki location) as servers or bartenders during the past
three years; (2) were not provided proper notice of defendant's
intention to compensate them at the tipped minimum wage; and (3)
were required to participate in a mandatory tip pool in which tips
were shared with non-tipped employees and/or management level
employees.

In accordance with the Opinion and Order, the Court ordered the
Plaintiff to file a revised proposed Notice on or before July 21,
2016.  The Defendant must file any objections to the revised
proposed Notice by July 28.

A copy of the Opinion and Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=viu2GCj5


PIONEER CREDIT: Faces "Biber" Suit in E.D. Va.
----------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. The
case is captioned Attila Biber, Individually and on Behalf of all
Others Similarly Situated, the Plaintiff, v. Pioneer Credit
Recovery, Inc., the Defendant, Case No. 1:16-cv-00804-TSE-IDD
(E.D. Virg., June 27, 2016). The assigned District Judge is Hon.
T. S. Ellis, III.

Pioneer Credit specializes in credit recovery on defaulted debt
specializing in government collections.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Thomas Ray Breeden, Esq.
          THOMAS R. BREEDEN PC
          10326 Lomond Drive
          Manassas, VA 20109
          Telephone: (703) 361 9277
          Facsimile: (703) 257 2259
          E-mail: trb@tbreedenlaw.com


RADIANT LOGISTICS: Barahona Class Action Pending in California
--------------------------------------------------------------
Radiant Logistics, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the Company continues
to defend against the case, Ingrid Barahoma v. Accountabilities,
Inc. d/b/a/ Accountabilities Staffing, Inc., Radiant Global
Logistics, Inc. and DBA Distribution Services, Inc.

On October 25, 2013, plaintiff Ingrid Barahona filed a purported
class action lawsuit against RGL, DBA Distribution Services, Inc.
("DBA"), and two third-party staffing companies (collectively, the
"Staffing Defendants") with whom Radiant and DBA contracted for
temporary employees. In the lawsuit, Ms. Barahona, on behalf of
herself and the putative class, seeks damages and penalties under
California law, plus interest, attorneys' fees, and costs, along
with equitable remedies, alleging that she and the putative class
were the subject of unfair and unlawful business practices,
including certain wage and hour violations relating to, among
others, failure to provide meal and rest periods, failure to pay
minimum wages and overtime, and failure to reimburse employees for
work-related expenses. Ms. Barahona alleges that she was jointly
employed by the staffing companies and Radiant and DBA. Radiant
and DBA deny Ms. Barahona's allegations in their entirety, deny
that they are liable to Ms. Barahona or the putative class members
in any way, and are vigorously defending against these allegations
based upon a preliminary evaluation of applicable records and
legal standards.

If Ms. Barahona's allegations were to prevail on all claims the
Company, as well as its co-defendants, could be liable for
uninsured damages in an amount that, while not significant when
evaluated against either the Company's assets or current and
expected level of annual earnings, could be material when judged
against the Company's earnings in the particular quarter in which
any such damages arose, if at all. However, based upon the
Company's preliminary evaluation of the matter, it does not
believe it is likely to incur material damages, if at all, since,
among others: (i) the amount of any potential damages remains
highly speculative at this stage of the proceedings; (ii) the
Company does not believe as a matter of law it should be
characterized as Ms. Barahona's employer and co-defendant
Accountabilities admitted to being the employer of record, (iii)
any settlement will be properly apportioned between all named
defendants and Radiant and DBA will not exclusively fund the
settlement; (iv) wage and hour class actions of this nature
typically settle for amounts significantly less than plaintiffs'
demands because of the uncertainly with litigation and the
difficulty in taking these types of cases to trial; and (v)
Plaintiff has indicated her desire to resolve this matter through
a mediated settlement. Plaintiff recently admitted in a report to
the court that she is unable to prosecute the case because the
payroll and personnel records she needs are in the possession of
Tri-State and/or Accountabilities, and the case has been stayed as
to them pending resolution of their chapter 11 bankruptcy
proceedings.

In January 2016, the court held a status conference, which has
since been continued until May 2016 so the parties can attempt to
obtain the necessary documents. DBA and Radiant are currently
attempting to obtain the necessary records through the Tri-State
and Accountabilities' Trustee. At this time, the Company is unable
to express an opinion as to the likely outcome of the matter.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") operates as a third party
logistics company, providing multi-modal transportation and
logistics services primarily in the United States and Canada.


RUSSELL'S TRAILER: Faces "Carson" Suit Seeking OT Pay Under FLSA
----------------------------------------------------------------
JONATHAN K. CARSON, Plaintiff, vs. RUSSELL'S TRAILER REPAIR, INC.,
d/b/a/ RUSSELL'S TRAILER SERVICE, INC., Defendants, Case 1:16-cv-
01714-SEB-DKL (S.D. Ind., June 29, 2016), alleges minimum wage and
overtime pay violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Russell's Trailer Repair, Inc., d/b/a Russell's Trailer Service,
Inc., is an Indiana corporation and a trailer repair company, with
facilities located in Indianapolis, Indiana.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Robert F. Hunt, Esq.
     HUNT, HASSLER, KONDRAS & MILLER LLP
     100 Cherry Street
     Terre Haute, IN 47807
     Phone: (812) 232-9691
     Fax: (812) 234-2881
     E-mail: hunt@huntlawfirm.net


SANDRIDGE ENERGY: Securities Litigation in Early Stages
-------------------------------------------------------
The securities litigation involving Sandridge Energy, Inc., is in
the early stages, according to the Company's Form 10-Q Report
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016,
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016.

On December 5, 2012, James Glitz and Rodger A. Thornberry, on
behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated
stockholders, filed a putative class action complaint in the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma against the
Company and certain current and former executive officers of the
Company. On January 4, 2013, Louis Carbone, on behalf of himself
and all other similarly situated stockholders, filed a
substantially similar putative class action complaint in the same
court and against the same defendants.

On March 6, 2013, the court consolidated these two actions under
the caption "In re SandRidge Energy, Inc. Securities Litigation"
(the "Securities Litigation") and appointed a lead plaintiff and
lead counsel. On July 23, 2013, plaintiffs filed a consolidated
amended complaint, which asserts a variety of federal securities
claims against the Company and certain of its current and former
officers and directors, among other defendants, on behalf of a
putative class of (a) purchasers of SandRidge common stock during
the period from February 24, 2011 to November 8, 2012, (b)
purchasers of common units of the Mississippian Trust I in or
traceable to its initial public offering on or about April 12,
2011, and (c) purchasers of common units of the Mississippian
Trust II (together with the Mississippian Trust I, the
"Mississippian Trusts") in or traceable to its initial public
offering on or about April 23, 2012. The claims are based on
allegations that the Company, certain of its current and former
officers and directors, and the Mississippian Trusts, among other
defendants, are responsible for making false and misleading
statements, and omitting material information, concerning a
variety of subjects, including oil and natural gas reserves, the
Company's capital expenditures, and certain transactions entered
into by companies allegedly affiliated with the Company's former
CEO Tom Ward.

On May 11, 2015, the court dismissed without prejudice plaintiffs'
claims against the Mississippian Trusts and the underwriter
defendants. On August 27, 2015, the court dismissed without
prejudice plaintiffs' claims against the Company and the
individual current and former officers and directors, and granted
plaintiffs leave to file a second amended consolidated complaint.

On October 23, 2015, plaintiffs filed their Second Consolidated
Amended Complaint in which plaintiffs assert federal securities
claims against the Company and certain of its current and former
officers and directors on behalf of a putative class of purchasers
of SandRidge common stock during the period between February 24,
2011, and November 8, 2012. The claims are based on allegations
that the Company and certain of its current and former officers
and directors are responsible for making false and misleading
statements, and omitting material information, concerning a
variety of subjects, including oil and gas reserves, the Company's
capital expenditures, and certain transactions entered into by
companies allegedly affiliated with the Company's former CEO Tom
Ward.

Because the Securities Litigation is in the early stages, an
estimate of reasonably possible losses associated with it, if any,
cannot be made until the facts, circumstances and legal theories
relating to the plaintiffs' claims and defendants' defenses are
fully disclosed and analyzed. The Company has not established any
reserves relating to the Securities Litigation. Each of the
Mississippian Trusts has requested that the Company indemnify it
for any losses it may incur in connection with the Securities
Litigation.


SANDRIDGE ENERGY: "Hart" Suit Terminated Following Bankruptcy
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hart v. Sandridge Energy Inc et al., Case No. 5:14-cv-00178 (W.D.
Okla.), was administratively terminated, pursuant to a May 23,
2016 order by the Hon. David L. Russell, without prejudice to the
rights of the parties to reopen for entry of any stipulation or
order within 60 days from the completion of the Defendant's
bankruptcy proceedings or the lifting of the automatic stay.

Sandridge Energy, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that on July 15, 2013,
James Hart and 15 other named plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint in the United States District Court for the District of
Kansas in an action undertaken individually and on behalf of
others similarly situated against SandRidge Energy, Inc.,
SandRidge Operating Company, SandRidge Exploration and Production,
LLC ("SandRidge E&P"), SandRidge Midstream, Inc., and Lariat
Services, Inc. In their Amended Complaint, plaintiffs allege that
the defendants failed to properly calculate overtime pay for the
plaintiffs and for other similarly situated current and former
employees. The plaintiffs further allege that the defendants
required the plaintiffs and other similarly situated current and
former employees to engage in work-related activities without pay.
The plaintiffs assert claims against the defendants for (i)
violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, (ii) violations of the
Kansas Wage Payment Act, (iii) breach of contract, and (iv) fraud,
and seek to recover unpaid wages and overtime pay, liquidated
damages, statutory penalties, economic damages, compensatory and
punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs, and both pre- and
post-judgment interest.

On October 3, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a Motion for Conditional
Collective Action Certification and for Judicial Notice to the
Class and a Motion to Toll the Statute of Limitations. On October
11, 2013, the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss and a Motion to
Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Western
District of Oklahoma.

On April 2, 2014, the court granted the defendants' Motion to
Dismiss and granted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint
by April 16, 2014, which they did on such date. On July 1, 2014,
the court granted plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Collective
Action Certification and for Judicial Notice to the Class, and
denied plaintiffs' Motion to Toll the Statute of Limitations.

On May 27, 2015, the parties reached an agreement in principle to
settle this lawsuit. Pursuant to such agreement, the Company will
establish a settlement fund from which to pay participating
plaintiffs' claims as well as plaintiffs' attorneys' fees. The
proposed settlement agreement is subject to final negotiations
between the parties and court approval. During 2015, the Company
established a $5.1 million reserve for this lawsuit.


SANTA MONICA, CA: Sued in C.D. Cal. Over Civil Rights Violation
---------------------------------------------------------------
Arlene Rosenblatt, an individual, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated v. City of Santa Monica and The City
Council of The City of Santa Monica, Case No. 2:16-cv-04481-ODW-
AGR (C.D. Cal., June 21, 2016), is brought against the Defendants
for violation of civil rights.

City of Santa Monica is a city west of downtown Los Angeles.

The City Council of The City of Santa Monica is the governing body
of Santa Monica, California.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Robert L. Esensten, Esq.
      Jordan S. Esensten, Esq.
      ESENSTEN LAW
      12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1660
      Los Angeles, CA 90028
      Telephone: (310) 273-3090
      Facsimile: (310) 207-5969
      E-mail: resensten@esenstenlaw.com
              jesensten@esenstenlaw.com


SEARS HOME: Colemans Seek Certification of Homeowners Class
-----------------------------------------------------------
Anthony and Eva Coleman ask the Court to certify a class in the
lawsuit styled ANTHONY COLEMAN AND AVA COLEMAN, the Plaintiffs, v.
SEARS HOME IMPROVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. (SHIP), the Defendant, Case
No. 2:16-cv-02537-NJB-MBN (E.D. La., June 29, 2016).

The Plaintiffs have also filed a motion to extend the deadline for
Plaintiffs to file a motion to certify the Class because the
Defendant has not provided adequate or complete disclosures, has
not responded to a pending subpoena, and has not responded to
pending discovery and because the information that SHIP has not
provided is relevant to Plaintiffs Motion to Certify.

As a result of SHIP's negligent installations, the affected
homeowners (1) have roofs that are inadequate or inappropriate for
the location in which they are built; (2) have homes that are not
building-code compliant; and (3) have roofs that do not have the
manufacturer's warranty that they intended to purchase.

The Plaintiffs request that the Court certify the following class:

     "All homeowners who live in a wind zone with a minimum wind
      uplift resistance of over 60 MPH or greater who were sold
      Owens-Corning Supreme 3-tab shingle roofs by Sears Home
      Improvement Products, Inc. between January 1, 2006 and
      today."

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=LW8T3MPB

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Caleb H. Didriksen III, Esq.
          Erin Bruce Saucier, Esq.
          Carl A. Woods III, Esq.
          Jeremy J. Pichon, Esq.
          Michael Finkelstein, Esq.
          DIDRIKSEN, SAUCIER, WOODS & PICHON, PLC
          3114 Canal Street
          New Orleans, LA 70119
          Telephone (504) 586 1600
          E-mail: caleb@dswplaw.com
                  erin@dswplaw.com
                  trey@dswplaw.com
                  jeremy@dswplaw.com
                  michael@dswplaw.com


SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS: Faces "Gaal" Suit Over Aliso Gas Leak
--------------------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Gaal, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
Southern California Gas Company, Sempra Energy, and Does 1 through
100, inclusive, Case No. BC624891 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 17,
2016), is brought on behalf of all the California residents who
live in the Porter Ranch district of the City and County of Los
Angeles, California who have been exposed to the noxious odors,
hazardous gases, chemicals, pollutants, and contaminants, property
damage and diminution in value emanating from the leak at the
Defendants' Aliso Canyon facility.

The Defendants operate a natural gas distribution facility
headquartered in Gas Company Tower, Los Angeles, California.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Steven R. Lovett, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN R. LOVETT
      21860 Burbank Blvd
      Woodland Hills, CA 91367
      Telephone: (818) 999-9397
      Facsimile: (818) 999-5048
      E-mail: slovett@lovettlawusa.com


SPARK NETWORKS: Settlement in Werner, Wright Cases Await Approval
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Spark Networks, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that a hearing date on the
settlement in the cases, Werner, et al. v. Spark Networks, Inc.
and Spark Networks USA, LLC and Wright, et al. v. Spark Networks,
Inc., Spark Networks USA, LLC, et al., will be determined by the
court.

On July 19, 2013, Aaron Werner, on behalf of himself and all other
similarly situated individuals, filed a putative Class Action
Complaint (the "Werner Complaint") in the Superior Court for the
State of California, County of Los Angeles against Spark Networks,
Inc. and Spark Networks USA, LLC (collectively "Spark Networks").
The Werner Complaint alleges that Spark Networks' website
ChristianMingle.com violates California's Unruh Civil Rights Act
(the "Unruh Act") by allegedly discriminating on the basis of
sexual orientation.  The Werner Complaint requests the following
relief: an injunction, statutory, general, compensatory, treble
and punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs, pre-judgment
interest, and an award for any other relief the Court deems just
and appropriate.

On December 23, 2013, Richard Wright, on behalf of himself and all
other similarly situated individuals, filed a putative Class
Action Complaint (the "Wright Complaint") in the Superior Court
for the State of California, County of San Francisco against Spark
Networks, Inc.  The Wright Complaint alleges that Spark Networks,
Inc.'s commercial dating services including ChristianMingle.com,
LDSSingles.com, CatholicMingle.com, BlackSingles.com,
MilitarySinglesConnection.com and AdventistSinglesConnection.com
violate the Unruh Act by allegedly intentionally and arbitrarily
discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.  The Wright
Complaint requests the following relief: a declaratory judgment, a
preliminary and permanent injunction, statutory penalties,
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, pre-judgment interest, and
an award for any other relief the Court deems just and
appropriate.

A motion filed by Spark Networks to coordinate the two matters in
Los Angeles Superior Court was granted. The parties have reached a
settlement including the following terms:  (1) individual
settlement payments of $4,000 each in statutory damages and $5,000
each in service awards to plaintiffs Werner and Wright, and (2)
$450,000 in attorneys' fees and costs to compensate Werner and
Wright's counsel for their time and out-of-pocket expenses.

In order to become effective, the settlement must be approved by
the court.  On April 19, 2016, the plaintiffs' counsel filed a
motion for an order granting approval of the settlement.  The
hearing date will be determined by the court. The Company has
recorded an accrual for the probable cost related to resolving
this matter of $468,000 as of March 31, 2016.


SPARK NETWORKS: AG Has No Objection to Israeli Case Settlement
--------------------------------------------------------------
Spark Networks, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the Attorney General
has notified the Court that it has no objection to the settlement
agreement in the case, Ben-Jacob vs. Spark Networks (Israel) Ltd.,
Gever vs. Spark Networks (Israel) Ltd. and Korland vs. Spark
Networks (Israel) Ltd.

Three class action law suits have been filed in Israel alleging
inter alia violations of the Israel Consumer Protection Law of
1981.  Spark Networks (Israel) Ltd. ("Spark Israel") was served
with a Statement of Claim and a Motion to Certify it as a Class
Action in the Ben-Jacob action on January 14, 2014.  The plaintiff
alleges that Spark Israel refused to cancel her subscription and
provide a refund for unused periods and claims that such a refusal
is in violation of the Consumer Protection Law.  Spark Israel was
served with a Statement of Claim and a motion to Certify it as a
Class Action in the Gever action on January 21, 2014.  The
plaintiff alleges that Spark Israel renewed his one month
subscription without receiving his positive agreement in advance
and claims that such renewal is prohibited under the Consumer
Protection Law and its regulations. Spark Israel was served with a
Statement of Claim and a Motion to Certify it as a Class Action in
the Korland action on February 12, 2014.  The plaintiff alleges
that Spark Israel refused to give her a full refund and charged
her the price of a one month subscription to the JDate website in
violation of the Consumer Protection Law.  In each of these three
cases, the plaintiff is seeking personal damages and damages on
behalf of a defined group.

On May 8, 2014, the Court granted Spark Israel's motion to
consolidate all three cases. All three cases are now consolidated
and will be litigated jointly. Spark Israel's combined response to
these motions to certify the class actions was filed November 1,
2014, and the plaintiffs responded to the combined response. The
parties had a hearing before the judge on December 24, 2014.

Following the hearing the judge ordered that the pleadings filed
by the parties be transferred to the Israel Consumer Council
("ICC") so that the ICC can provide its position as to the
parties' allegations within 90 days. The ICC issued its opinion on
April 1, 2015.  Following the filing of the ICC opinion, the
parties filed briefs addressing the ICC opinion. On January 7,
2016, the parties advised the Court that they have agreed on the
terms of a settlement agreement, and jointly moved to approve the
agreement and give it the effect of a judgment. According to the
terms of the settlement agreement, clients who bought a
subscription to JDate.co.il on October 12, 2008 or later will be
entitled to receive certain benefits. The settlement agreement,
which provides for compensation and legal fees, will only come
into effect if the court approves it.

On January 14, 2016 the Court ordered the parties to publish the
terms of the proposed settlement agreement. The Court allowed for
the Attorney General or any person who wishes to object to the
settlement or exclude himself from the class to file their
position with the Court through March 10, 2016.

On March 10, 2016, the Consumer Council filed an objection to the
settlement agreement, arguing inter alia that the benefits offered
to the clients are insufficient, and that the Company's new
business model does not comply with certain legal requirements.
The Company and the plaintiffs filed their responses on March 24,
2016. On April 14, 2016, the Attorney General notified the Court
that it has no objection to the settlement agreement. The Company
has recorded an accrual for the probable cost related to resolving
this matter of $52,000 as of March 31, 2016.


STAPLES INC: Faces "Braden" Suit in S.D. Fla.
---------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Staples, Inc. The
case is styled DARLA K. BRADEN, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. STAPLES, INC., the
Defendant, Case No. 3:16-cv-03848-MAS-LHG (S.D. Fla., June 28,
2016). The assigned Judge is Hon. Michael A. Shipp.

Staples is a large United States office supply chain store, with
over 2,000 stores worldwide in 26 countries.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Mark W. Morris, Esq.
          CLARK LAW FIRM
          811 16th Avenue
          Belmar, NJ 07719
          Telephone: (732) 443-0333
          E-mail: mmorris@clarklawnj.com


STEPHENS INSTITUTE: Faces "Coleman" Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
-----------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Stephens Institute. The case is
captioned COLEMAN, SOPHIA INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
SIMILARLY SITUATED, the Plaintiff, v. STEPHENS INSTITUTE, A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; DOES 1 THROUGH 25, INCLUSIVE; ACADEMY OF
ART UNIVERSITY WELLNESS & ATHLETICS FOUNDATION, A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION; and ACADEMY OF ART UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, Case No. CGC-16-552750 (Cal. Super. Ct.,
June 27, 2016).

Stephens Institute is a private research university in Hoboken,
NJ. It offers undergraduate and graduate programs in the sciences
and technology.


STERN & EISENBERG: Faces "Reese" Suit in E.D. Virg.
---------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Stern & Eisenberg Mid Atlantic,
PC. The case is captioned Mark S. Reese, Sr. and Connie W. Reese,
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, the
Plaintiffs, v. Stern & Eisenberg Mid Atlantic, PC, the Defendant,
Case No. 3:16-cv-00496-REP (E.D. Va., June 27, 2016). The assigned
District Judge is Hon. Robert E. Payne.

Stern & Eisenberg provides a full range of services to
individuals, local business and national companies.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Dale Wood Pittman, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICE OF
          DALE W. PITTMAN, P.C.
          112-A W Tabb St
          Petersburg, VA 23803-3212
          Telephone: (804) 861 6000
          Facsimile: (804) 861 3368
          E-mail: dale@pittmanlawoffice.com

               - and -

          Craig Carley Marchiando, Esq.
          Leonard Anthony Bennett, Esq.
          Susan Mary Rotkis, Esq.
          CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES
          763 J Clyde Morris Boulevard, Suite 1A
          Newport News, VA 23601
          Telephone: (757) 930 3660
          Facsimile: (757) 930 3662
          E-mail: craig@clalegal.com
                  lenbennett@clalegal.com
                  srotkis@clalegal.com


SYNCHRONY BANK: Hearing on Class Cert. Bid Continued to Aug. 30
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Clerk of Court on June 29, 2016, made a docket entry regarding
Plaintiff's motion for class certification in the lawsuit styled
Anand Narantuya, the Plaintiff, v. Synchrony Bank, et al., the
Defendant, Case No. 1:16-cv-06525 (N.D. Ill., June 29, 2016).

The motion for class certification is continued to the initial
status hearing on August 30, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.  The motion
presentment hearing on July 30, 2016, is stricken. Parties need
not appear.  The minutes are entered before the Hon. Andrea R.
Wood.

A copy of the Docket Entry is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=kVLtWYMa


TITAN AMERICA: "Ordiozola" Class Suit Removed to S.D. Florida
-------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit entitled Carlos Ordiozola and other
similarly situated non-exempt individuals v. Titan America LLC and
Bill Zarkalis, Case No. 16-011151-CA-01, was removed from the 11th
Judicial Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade to the U.S. District
Court Southern District of Florida (Miami). The District Court
Clerk assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-22342-JEM to the proceeding.

The Plaintiff asserts labor-related claims.

The Defendants own and operate a heavy building materials company
headquartered at 1151 Azalea Garden Road Norfolk, Virginia 23502.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Brody Max Shulman, Esq.
      Jason Saul Remer, Esq.
      REMER & GEORGES-PIERRE, PLLC
      Courthouse Tower
      44 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
      Miami, FL 33130
      Telephone: (305) 416-5000
      Facsimile: (305) 416-5005
      E-mail: bshulman@rgpattorneys.com
              jremer@rgpattorneys.com

The Defendant is represented by:

      David M. DeMaio, Esq.
      Kelly Marie Pena, Esq.
      OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART PC
      701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1600
      Miami, FL 33131
      Telephone: (305) 374-0506
      Facsimile: (305) 374-0456
      E-mail: david.demaio@ogletreedeakins.com
              kelly.pena@ogletreedeakins.com


TO-RISE LLC: Faces Lawsuit Alleging Violations of N.Y. Labor Laws
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MOSCOSO, BERNARDO MENDOZA, NICHOLAS MITRANO, KEVIN MANCO, and
WILMER MARIN GARCIA, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others
Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, vs. TO-RISE, LLC and JORGE SALCEDO
a/k/a JORGE E. SALCEDO JR., Defendants, Case 1:16-cv-03604
(E.D.N.Y., June 29, 2016), alleges violations of the New York
Labor Law and the supporting New York State Department of Labor
Regulations.

To-Rise, LLC is a business involved in the transport of office and
non-perishable restaurant supplies in and around New York City.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     William Cafaro, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM CAFARO
     108 West 39th Street, Suite 602
     New York, NY 10018
     Phone: (212)583-7400


TRADER JOE'S: "Aliano" Suit Moved from N.D. Ill. to C.D. Cal.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Kathy Aliano, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, the Plaintiff, v. Trader Joe's Company, a California
corporation, the Defendant, Case No. 1:16-cv-02623, was
transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District
of California (Western Division - Los Angeles). The Central
District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:16-cv-04733-MWF-E to the
proceeding. The assigned Judge is Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald.

Trader Joe's owns and operates a chain of convenience stores in
the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Thomas A Zimmerman, Jr., Esq.
          Amelia Susan Newton, Esq.
          Jordan Rudnick, Esq.
          Maebetty Kirby, Esq.
          Matthew C De Re, Esq.
          Nickolas J Hagman, Esq.
          Sharon Harris, Esq.
          ZIMMERMAN LAW OFFICES PC
          77 West Washington Street Suite 1220
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 440 0020
          Facsimile: (312) 440 4180
          E-mail: tom@attorneyzim.com
                  amy@attorneyzim.com
                  jordan@attorneyzim.com
                  maebetty@attorneyzim.com
                  matt@attorneyzim.com
                  nick@attorneyzim.com
                  sharon@attorneyzim.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Keith R Solar, Esq.
          Robert J Parks, Esq.
          BUCHANAN INGERSOLL AND ROONEY LLP
          600 West Broadway Suite 1100
          San Diego, CA 92071
          Telephone: (619) 239 8700
          Facsimile: (619) 702 3898
          E-mail: keith.solar@bipc.com
                  robert.parks@bipc.com


UNITED AIRLINES: "Medina" Suit Seeks Penalties Under Labor Code
--------------------------------------------------------------
JOSE MEDINA, as an individual and on behalf of all aggrieved
employees, the P1aintiffss, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC, a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, the Defendants, Case No.
Be 624 742 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 22, 2016), seeks judgment
against Defendants for penalties and/or damages for violations of
the California Labor Code, including without limitation, failure
to provide employees with meal breaks.

The Defendants allegedly acted intentional and deliberate
indifference and conscious disregard to the rights of all mechanic
employees by failing to provide a second meal break for each shift
worked more than 10 hours. Further, for some of the shifts worked
for less than 10 hours, Defendants failed to provide an
opportunity to take a meal break within the first five hours of
work.

United Airlines, commonly referred to as United, is a major
American airline headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Larry W. Lee, Esq.
          DIVERSITY LAW GROUP
          515 S. Figueroa St., Suite 1250
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Telephone: (213) 488 6555
          Facsimile: (213) 488 6554
          E-mail: Iwlee@diversitylaw.com

               - and -

          Edward W. Choi, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF CHOI & ASSOCIATES,
          515 S. Figueroa St., Suite 1250
          Los Angeles, CA 90071
          Telephone: (213) 381 1515
          Facsimile: (213) 465 4885
          E-mail: edward.choi@calaw.biz

               - and -

          William L. Marder, Esq.
          POLARIS LAW GROUP
          501 San Benito Street, Suite 200
          Hollister, CA 95023
          Telephone: (831) 531 4214
          Facsimile: (831) 634 0333


UNITED AIRLINES: Vidrio Seeks to Certify Flight Attendants Class
----------------------------------------------------------------
Felicia Vidrio, one of the Plaintiffs in the lawsuit titled
FELICIA VIDRIO and PAUL BRADLEY, individually, and on behalf of
all others similarly situated v. UNITED AIRLINES INC., and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive, Case No. 2:15-cv-07985-PSG-MRW (C.D. Cal.),
asks the Court to certify this Inaccurate Wage Statement Class:

     All persons who were or are employed by United Airlines Inc.
     in California as flight attendants at any time from July 6,
     2014 up to the present.

The Plaintiff also asks the Court for an order appointing her as
class representative, appointing Jackson Hanson LLP as class
counsel, and issuing class notice with the opportunity to opt out
in the Plaintiff's proposed form.

The Court will commence a hearing on August 22, 2016, at 1:30
p.m., to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=udi8z5Tv

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jeffrey C. Jackson, Esq.
          Kirk D. Hanson, Esq.
          JACKSON HANSON, LLP
          2790 Truxtun Road, Suite 140
          San Diego, CA 92106
          Telephone: (619) 523-9001
          Facsimile: (619) 523-9002
          E-mail: jeff@jacksonhanson.com
                  atty@JacksonHanson.com


UNITED BUILDING: Faces "Jacob" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
----------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Jacob and Carmen Tamayo, individually and on behalf of all
other persons similarly situated v. United Building Maintenance
Associates, Inc., and Sharad Madison, Case No. 155205/2016 (N.Y.
Sup. Ct., June 21, 2016), is brought against the Defendants for
failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

The Defendants own and operate a janitorial services company
located at 121 East 24th Street, 9th Floor, New York, New York
10010.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Lloyd R. Ambinder, Esq.
      VIRGINIA AND AMBINDER, LLP
      40 Broad Street, 7th Floor
      New York, NY 10004
      Telephone: (212) 943-9080
      E-mail: lambinder@vandallp.com

         - and -

      Andrew Glenn, Esq.
      Jodi Jaffe, Esq.
      JAFFE GLENN LAW GROUP, P.A.
      301 N. Harrison Street
      Princeton, NJ
      Telephone: (201) 687-9977


UNITED STATES: "Golden" Class Suit Removed to Dist. Columbia
------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit styled David A. Golden, individually, and
as parent and next friend of Connor B. Golden, a minor and Ronnie
Golden and Liliana Golden, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated v. United States Office of Personnel
Management, Keypoint Government Solutions, Katherine Archuleta,
Donna Seymour, and Beth Cobert, Case No. 5:16-cv-00656, was
transferred from the District of Alabama Northern to the U.S.
District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC). The District
Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-01253-ABJ to the proceeding.

The case alleges violation of the Right to Privacy Act.

United States Office of Personnel Management is an independent
agency of the United States government that manages the civil
service of the federal government.


UNIVERSAL PICTURES: Fitzgerald Seeks Certification of Class
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit titled CHARLIE FITZGERALD III,
individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v.
UNIVERSAL PICTURES, INC. a Delaware Corporation, Case No. 6:16-cv-
01193-CEM-DAB (M.D. Fla.), moves the Court for class certification
and concurrently asks for extension to certify class.  The
Plaintiff seeks certification this class:

     "All persons within the United States who received one or
      more text messages from Defendant or Defendant's agent(s)
      and whose number is assigned to a cellular telephone
      service, the message was sent without prior written express
      consent and not pursuant to emergency purposes, between
      June 24, 2012, and the date of certification of this
      class."

The Case involves the Defendant's alleged violation of the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act through the transmission of
unsolicited text messages without prior written express consent
and not pursuant to an existing or ongoing emergency.

The Plaintiff also asks the Court to allow for the Parties to
engage in discovery on class-wide issues, and to grant the
Plaintiff leave to file a full memorandum in support of her Motion
for Class Certification upon the conclusion of class-wide
discovery.  The Plaintiff further asks the Court to grant the
Motion for Class Certification or, alternatively, grant said
motion in its entirety after the close of class-wide discovery and
full briefing of the issues presented.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=OajjTzdT

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edmund A. Normand, Esq.
          NORMAND LAW, PLLC
          62 W. Colonial Dr., Suite 209
          Orlando, FL 32801
          Telephone: (407) 603-6031
          E-mail: ed@ednormand.com


UNIVERSAL PROTECTION: Faces "Cooper" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
----------------------------------------------------------------
Jacqueline Cooper and Gerald Richardson, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. Universal Protection
Service, LP and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No. RG1682042
(Cal. Super. Ct., June 21, 2016), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
California Labor Code.

Universal Protection Service, LP is a California limited
partnership doing business in the State of California providing
security services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Larry W. Lee, Esq.
      Kristen M. Agnew, Esq.
      DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, P.C.
      515 S. Figueroa St., Suite 1250
      Los Angeles, CA 90071
      Telephone: (213) 488-6555
      Facsimile: (213) 488-6554

         - and -

      William L. Marder, Esq.
      POLARIS LAW GROUP LLP
      501 San Benito Street, Suite 200
      Hollister, CA 95023
      Telephone: (831) 531-4214
      Facsimile: (831) 634-0333
      E-mail: bill@polarislawgroup.com


V&J NATIONAL: Faces "Spano" Suit Over Failure to Pay Min. Wage
--------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Spano, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. V&J National Enterprises, LLC, V&J United Enterprises,
LLC and V&J Holding Companies, Inc., Case No. 6:16-cv-06419
(W.D.N.Y., June 21, 2016), is brought against the Defendants for
failure to pay minimum wages in violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

The Defendants own and operate more than 60 restaurants in New
York and Massachusetts.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jeremiah Frei-Pearson, Esq.
      D. Greg Blankinship, Esq.
      FINKELSTEIN, BLANKINSHIP,
      FREI-PEARSON & GARBER, LLP
      445 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 605
      White Plains, NY 10601
      Telephone: (914) 298-3281
      Facsimile: (914) 824-1561
      E-mail: jfrei-pearson@fbfglaw.com


VROOM INC: Faces "Amini" Lawsuit Alleging Violation of TCPA
-----------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Amini individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated, v. Vroom, Inc., Case 8:16-cv-01204 (C.D. Cal., June 29,
2016) seeks damages, injunctive relief, and any other available
legal or equitable remedies, resulting from the alleged illegal
actions of Vroom, Inc., in negligently contacting Plaintiff on
Plaintiff's cellular telephone, in violation of the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act.

Defendant buys and sells used vehicles through the internet.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Jessica R. K. Dorman, Esq.
     Joshua B. Swigart, Esq.
     HYDE & SWIGART
     2221 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 101
     San Diego, CA 92108
     Phone: (619) 233-7770
     Fax: (619) 297-1022
     E-mail: jessica@westcoastlitigation.com
             josh@westcoastlitigation.com


WAL-MART STORES: "Reeves" Suit Consolidated in MDL 2705
-------------------------------------------------------
Nancy Reeves, Rhonda Lorenz, Michael Wills, Michelle Walker, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, the
Plaintiffs, v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the Defendant, Case No. 3:16-
cv-01253, was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of California, to the U.S. District Court for
the Northern District of Illinois - (Chicago). The Northern
District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-06668 to the
proceeding.

The "Reeves" case is being consolidated with MDL 2705 in re: 100%
GRATED PARMESAN CHEESE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION.
The MDL was created by order of the United States Judicial Panel
on Multidistrict Litigation On June 2, 2016. All actions involve
the alleged mislabeling of any 100% grated parmesan cheese product
in the Eastern District of Missouri. They request that the MDL
encompass the actions in their initial motion concerning Kraft and
Wal-Mart, as well as potential tag-along actions involving Target,
SuperValu, Albertsons, and the ICCO-Cheese Company. In its June 2,
2016 order, the MDL panel found that common factual questions
arise from plaintiffs' allegations that defendants deceived
consumers by marketing products containing cellulose as "100%"
grated parmesan cheese. Common factual issues will include the
underlying laboratory testing, consumer perception of the labeling
representation, the alleged impact on pricing, and ICCO's alleged
role as a common supplier for Wal-Mart and other stores selling
house brand "100%" grated parmesan cheese products. Presiding
Judge in the MDL is Hon. Gary Feinerman, United States District
Judge. The lead case is 1:16-cv-05802.

Wal-Mart is an American multinational retail corporation that
operates a chain of hypermarkets.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Sean Clinton Woods, Esq.
          Theodore H. Chase, Esq.
          AUDET & PARTNERS, LLC
          711 Van Ness Ave, Suite 500
          San Francisco, CA 94102
          Telephone: (415) 568 2555
          Facsimile: (415) 568 2556
          E-mail: cwoods@audetlaw.com
                  tchase@audetlaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Roger Leonard Scott, Esq.
          GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
          3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 1000
          Irvine, CA 92612
          Telephone: (949) 732 6524
          Facsimile: (949) 732 6501
          E-mail: scottro@gtlaw.com


WALGREEN CO: Faces "Heinzl" Suit in W.D. Penn.
----------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against WALGREEN CO.  The case is
captioned SARAH HEINZL, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. WALGREEN CO., the Defendant,
Case No. 2:16-cv-00960-RCM (W.D. Penn., June 27, 2016). The
assigned Magistrate Judge is Hon. Robert C. Mitchell.

Walgreen is an American pharmaceutical company which operates the
second-largest chain in the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Benjamin J. Sweet, Esq.
          CARLSON LYNCH SWEET
          & KILPELA, LLP
          1133 Penn Avenue, 5th Floor
          Pittsburgh, PA 15222
          Telephone: (412) 322 9243
          Facsimile: (412) 231 0246
          E-mail: bsweet@carlsonlynch.com


WELLS FARGO: Seeks Review of Ruling in "McLaughlin" Class Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., doing business as Wells Fargo
Home Mortgage, filed an appeal from a court ruling in the lawsuit
entitled Latasha McLaughlin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No.
3:15-cv-02904-WHA, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California, San Francisco.

As previously reported in the Class Action Reporter on June 30,
2016, Judge William Alsup granted, in part, and denied, in part,
the Plaintiff's motion for class certification.

Judge Alsup certified a damages class and a declaratory class for
claims under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA).  The judge also
appointed Latasha McLaughlin as class representative of all
plaintiff classes, Berman DeValerio and Wolf Popper LLP as class
counsel, with Patricia I. Avery of Wolf Popper LLP to serve as
lead counsel.

A full-text copy of Judge Alsup's June 22, 2016 order is available
at https://is.gd/v55I4m from Leagle.com.

The appellate case is captioned as Latasha McLaughlin v. Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 16-80089, in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Plaintiff-Respondent Latasha McLaughlin, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated, is represented by:

          Patricia Avery, Esq.
          WOLF POPPER LLP
          845 Third Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212) 759-4600
          E-mail: pavery@wolfpopper.com

               - and -

          Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr., Esq.
          BERMAN DeVALERIO
          One California Street
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (415) 433-3200
          E-mail: jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com

Defendant-Petitioner Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., is represented by:

          Raymond A. Cardozo, Esq.
          Ashley L. Shively, Esq.
          David Jason de Jesus, Esq.
          REED SMITH LLP
          101 Second Street
          San Francisco, CA 94105
          Telephone: (415) 543-8700
          E-mail: rcardozo@reedsmith.com
                  ashively@reedsmith.com
                  ddejesus@reedsmith.com


WELTMAN & WEINBERG: Verburg Seeks Certification of 3 Classes
------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs move for an order certifying action as a class
action in the lawsuit styled STEVEN J. VERBURG et al., the
Plaintiffs, v. WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A. et al., the
Defendants, Case No. 1:13-cv-01328-RJJ  (W.D. Mich., June 29,
2016).

The Plaintiffs in their corrected Second Amended Complaint filed
against Defendants have alleged violations of the federal Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

The Plaintiffs propose three classes:

     "A General Class comprises all judgment debtors who were
      subject to a Michigan garnishment that: (1) was signed by
      Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A.; (2) was filed during
      the class period; and (3) had included in the amount of the
      unsatisfied judgment then due (a) the costs of that
      garnishment, or (b) the costs of a prior garnishment before
      Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. had received either

       (i) a disclosure for the prior garnishment indicating
           the garnishee owed money to, held property of, or
          employed the judgment debtor, or

      (ii) actual payment on the prior garnishment from the
           garnishee."

     "A Midland Subclass comprises all judgment debtors who were
      subject to a Michigan garnishment that: (1) was signed by
      Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. to collect a judgment
      payable to Midland Funding LLC, (2) was filed during the
      class period; and (3) had included in the amount of the
      unsatisfied judgment then due (a) the costs of that
      garnishment, or (b) the costs of a prior garnishment before
      Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. had received either

       (i) a disclosure for the prior garnishment indicating
           the garnishee owed money to, held property of, or
           employed the judgment debtor, or

      (ii) actual payment on the prior garnishment from the
           garnishee."

     "A LVNV Subclass comprises all judgment debtors who were
      subject to a Michigan garnishment that: (1) was signed by
      Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. to collect a judgment
      payable to LVNV Funding , LLC, (2) was filed during the
      class period; and (3) had included in the amount of the
      unsatisfied judgment then due (a) the costs of that
      garnishment, or (b) the costs of a prior garnishment before
      Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. had received either

       (i) a disclosure for the prior garnishment indicating
           the garnishee owed money to, held property of, or
           employed the judgment debtor, or

      (ii) actual payment on the prior garnishment from the
           garnishee."

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=pYSOIrgz


WEST VIRGINIA: Faces "Greer" Suit in N.D. W. Virg.
--------------------------------------------------
A class action lawsuit has been filed against State of West
Virginia. The case is titled Bernard L. Greer, on behalf of
himself and in behalf of all others similarly situated, the
Plaintiff, v. State of West Virginia, the Defendant, Case No.
1:16-cv-00142-IMK-MJA (N.D. W. Virg., June 28, 2016). The assigned
District Judge is Hon. Irene M. Keeley.

West Virginia is an eastern U.S. state in the tree-covered
Appalachian Mountains.

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


WOODLAND, CA: Faces "Olson" Lawsuit Alleging FLSA Violation
-----------------------------------------------------------
BRIAN OLSON, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated
individuals, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WOODLAND, Defendant, Case 2:16-
at-00766 (E.D. Cal., June 29, 2016), seeks to recover alleged
unpaid overtime and other compensation, interest thereon,
liquidated damages, costs of suit and reasonable attorney fees
under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     David E. Mastagni, Esq.
     Isaac S. Stevens, Esq.
     Ace T. Tate, Esq.
     MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT
     1912 "I" Street
     Sacramento, CA 95811
     Phone: (916) 446-4692
     Fax: (916) 447-4614


YINGLI GREEN: Court Directed Plaintiffs to File Amended Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limited said in its Form 20-F
Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May
16, 2016, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that class
action plaintiffs had until June 24, 2016 to file an amended
complaint.

The Company said, "In May and June 2015, two individual plaintiffs
respectively filed purported class action securities fraud
lawsuits against us, our chairperson and chief executive officer,
Mr. Liansheng Mao, and our director and chief executive officer,
Mr. Yiyu Wang, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District
of California, both alleging, among other things, that we made
false and misleading statements and failed to disclose certain
material financial information."

"In October 2015, the cases were consolidated and the court
appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel. In November 2015, lead
plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint. The amended
complaint contends that we and certain of our officers and
directors made false or misleading statements between December 2,
2010 and May 15, 2015 regarding (i) the Chinese government's
Golden Sun program, which provided subsidies for solar projects in
China; and (ii) our accounts receivable attributable to Chinese
customers. The sole claim against us is for violation of Section
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

"In December 2015, we filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated
suit. Plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion on January 15,
2016, and we filed a reply on January 29, 2016. The Court heard
oral argument on the motion on May 2, 2016. On May 10, 2016, the
Court issued a written decision granting Yingli's motion to
dismiss with leave to amend. Plaintiffs have until June 24, 2016
to file an amended complaint."


                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Marion
Alcestis A. Castillon, Ma. Cristina Canson, Noemi Irene A. Adala,
Joy A. Agravante, Valerie Udtuhan, Julie Anne L. Toledo,
Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2016. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.



                 * * *  End of Transmission  * * *