CAR_Public/160613.mbx              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, June 13, 2016, Vol. 18, No. 117




                            Headlines


ABSOLUTE LAWN: Certification of Class Sought in "Bridges" Suit
ADVANTAGE MEDICAL: "Spine & Sports" Sues Over Faxed Ads
AIR LIQUIDE: Certification of Class of Field Technicians Sought
ALABAMA, USA: Bids in "Dunn" Suit Denied Due to Impending Deal
ALBERTVILLE, AL: Faces "Moore" Class Action

ALICO INC: Stockholder Case Settlement Awaits Final Approval
ALLIED APPLIANCE: Old Town Pizza Seeks Certification of Class
AM RETAIL: Faces "Ramos" Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
AMERICAN HONDA: Recalls Mini Tillers Due to Injury Risk
AMTECH SYSTEMS: $325,000 Fees and Expenses Paid in Full in April

APPLIED UNDERWRITERS: Faces Tapia Suit in S.D.N.Y.
BANK OF AMERICA: "Kansas City" Sues Over Anti-Trust Violations
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY: Sued in Fla. Over Deceptive Trade Practices
BIG T ENERGY: "Schones" Suit to Recover Minimum, Overtime Pay
BLAIN SUPPLY: Certification of Class Sought in "Serifoski" Suit

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces 2 Lawsuits in Conn. Super. Ct.
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: 5 Suits Filed in Conn. Over Pradaxa (R)
BOX COMPONENTS: Recalls Bicycle Forks Due to Fall Hazard
BROAN-NUTONE LLC: Recalls Ventilation Fans Due to Fire Hazard
BROWARD COUNTY, FL: Certification of Class Sought in "Ruffino"

BURGER'S OZARK: Recalls Pulled Pork Products Due to Misbranding
BUTTERFIELD FOODS: Recalls Broccoli Salad Dressing Products
CASHFORIPHONES.COM: "Washington" Suit Moved from S.D. Cal to Nev.
CBL & ASSOCIATES: "French" Sues Over Share Price Drop
CLEARSPRING LOAN: Babbitt Seeks Certification of Two Classes

CLOUGHERTY PACKING: Faces "Salazar" Wage and Hour Suit in Calif.
CMRE FINANCIAL: Certification of Class Sought in "Neldner" Suit
COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY: Kaczynski Seeks Certification of Class
COMPUTER SCIENCES: Strauch Seeks Certification of Three Classes
CONWAY PROWASH: Class Certification Bid in "Steimel" Suit Tossed

CREDENCE RESOURCE: Pinkney Seeks Certification of Class in Wisc.
CROATIA: Class Certification Sought in "Lalich" Holocaust Suit
CURREY & COMPANY: Recalls Crystal Chandeliers Due to Fall Risk
DENTAL RESOURCE: Certification of Class Sought in "Neuer" Suit
DIODES INCORPORATED: Pension Trust Fund Suit Concluded

DOMETIC CORP: To Seek Dismissal of "Papasan" Class Suit
EASTMAN KODAK: Awaits Final Approval of ERISA Case Settlement
ECOLAB INC: Still Defending 5 Wage Hour Suits
ECHO THERAPEUTICS: Misled Stockholders Over Fee-Shifting Bylaw
EQT PRODUCTION: Renewed Class Certification Bid Due on Sept. 30

EZPAWN FLORIDA: Court Refuses to Certify Class; Junks "Ward" Suit
FEDERAL NATIONAL: D.C. Circuit Heard Oral Argument on Appeal
FERRING PHARMACEUTICALS: Faces "Rosas" Suit in D.N.J.
FITBIT INC: "Rivera" SEC Fraud Suit Removed to N.D. Cal.
GARDEN FRESH: FLSA Class Certification Sought in "Johnson" Suit

GARMIN LTD: Wins Preliminary Approval of "Katz" Suit Settlement
GENERAL MILLS: Recalls Flour Products Due to E. Coli
GLOBAL EFFECTS: "Crosson" Suit seeks Minimum Wages, Overtime
GOLDEN 1: "Cyr" Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages Under Labor Code
GOOGLE INC: Svenson Seeks Certification of Class and Subclass

GREENES ENERGY: "Lee" Labor Suit Transferred to W.D. Pa.
HESKA CORP: Class Cert. Bid in "Fauley" Suit Under Advisement
HARVEY & MADDING: Sued in Cal Super. Ct. Over False Advertisement
HED CYCLING: Recalls Hed Black Rims Due to Crash Hazard
HOLLANDER SLEEP: Recalls Mattress Pads Due to Fire Hazard

HOME HEALTH: Conditional Certification Granted in "Jasper" Suit
HUNGARY: Star Seeks Class Certification of Suit Over Holocaust
INDOFF INC: Hearing on Bid to Certify Class Continued to July 7
INTERNATIONAL PAPER: Kleen Products Action in Discovery Stage
INTERNATIONAL PAPER: Still Defends Homebuilders' Lawsuit

INTERNATIONAL PAPER: Canada Case Settlement Subject to Negotiation
JAMES STEWART: Class Certification in "Pipkins" Suit Dismissed
KASHI COMPANY: Recalls Granola Products Due to Listeria
KBK SERVICES: Court Certifies FLSA Class in "Ricard" Suit
KEARNES PAINTING: Certification of Class Sought in "Miller" Suit

KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP: Bahamas Surgery Seeks Class Certification
LASERSHIP INC: Faces "Knox" Suit E.D. Penn.
LINCOLN NATIONAL: Expects Lehman Brothers Action to Be Dismissed
MANHATTAN BEER: "Mejia" Suit to Recover OT, Damages
MAYBORN USA: Recalls Spill-Proof Cups Due to Mold Risk

MDL 2179: Nalco Still Defends Oil Spill Litigation
MDL 2437: Interlocutory Appeal of Summary Judgment Order Okayed
MEADOW GOLD: Recalls Whipping Cream Products
MERCEDES-BENZ USA: Callaway Seeks Certification of SUV Class
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY: Checker Suit Moved from Cir. Ct. to S.D. Fla.

MIDLAND CREDIT: Wins Summary Judgment in "Huebner" Class Suit
MILLER ALE HOUSE: "Morello" Suit to Recover OT and Minimum Pay
MIRKA USA: Recalls Orbital Sanders Due to Fire Hazard
MISTRAS GROUP: Plaintiff's Settlement Approval Motion Due July 5
MORGANS HOTEL: "Sinclair" Sues Over Breach of Fiduciary Duties

NANTKWEST: "Hare" Action Alleges SEC Irregularities
NATIONAL AUTO: Faces "Mouw" Suit in D.N.J.
NEW YORK TIMES: Settlement Talks Fail
NOBLE HOUSE: Recalls Counter Stools Due to Laceration Hazard
NORTH AMERICAN BANCARD: West Loop Seeks Certification of Class

O-TEX PUMPING: Conditional Certification in "Wright" Suit Denied
OAKWOOD, OH: Thompson Seeks Certification of Class of Sellers
OHIO, USA: Williams Seeks Certification of Dayton Prisoners Class
OSPREY CHILD: Recalls Child Backpack Carriers Due to Fall Risk
PALATINE, IL: Certification of Class Sought in "Collins" Suit

PFIZER INC: "Ulbinsky" Sues Over Viagra Side Effects
PFIZER INC: "Kersmarki" Sues Over Viagra Side Effects
PRIMESOURCE HEALTH CARE: "Wilson" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
PUBLIX SUPER: Recalls Nut, Seed and Raisin Mix Due to Listeria
PVH CORPORATION: Faces "Ramos" Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.

RANDY'S TRUCKING: "Phillips" Suit Seeks OT Pay, Damages
RESULTS COMPANIES: Mulligan Seeks Certification of FLSA Class
RESURGENT CAPITAL: Wins Prelim. Nod of "Fritz" Suit Settlement
RHEEM SALES: Recalls Electric Water Heaters Due to Burn Hazard
ROBERTSON'S READY MIX: "Peruch" Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages

RUBY TUESDAY: Class Certification Sought in "Krystek" Suit
S2VERIFY: Hawkins Seeks Certification of Class in California
SALAAM BOMBAY: Faces "Zhu" Suit in S.D.N.Y.
SAM WON GAHK: Faces "Pichol" Suit in E.D.N.Y.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS: "Coleman-Anacleto" Suit Moved to N.D. Cal.

SBS TRANSPORT: "Hagen" Sues Over OT Pay, Illegal E-mail Access
SCHLEE & STILLMAN: Faces "Feldbrand" Suit in E.D.N.Y.
SID WAINER: Recalls Tart Shell Products Due to Tree Nuts
SOLOMON SNACKS: Recalls Meat Pie Products Due to Misbranding
SPD SWISS: Bid for Class Certification in "Olvera" Suit Stricken

STANDARD DISTRIBUTION: "Castro" Suit Moved to E.D. Cal.
SUGAR TRANSPORT: Stipulation Over Class Action Notice Entered
SUN TRANSACTIONS: Central Alarm Seeks Certification of Class
SUNSHINE USA: "Zhang" Suit to Recover OT, Costs and Expenses
SWEET EARTH: Recalls Big Sur Burrito Due to Packaging Error

SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES: Seeks to Limit Securities Suit Class Period
TAYLOR FARMS: Recalls Chicken Salad Product Due to Misbranding
TJX COMPANIES: Recalls Foldable Lounge Chairs Due to Fall Risk
TORNADO PRODUCTION: "Kinikin" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
TRANSNATIONAL BANKCARD: Old Town Pizza Seeks Class Certification

TROYER(R) CHEESE: Recalls Nut Products Due to Listeria
TVI INC: "Godhigh" Suit to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages
UNILIFE CORP: "Gomez" Sues Over Share Price Drop
UNITED RECEIVABLES: Class Certification Sought in "Rheuark" Suit
VITAMINERALS VM: Faces Comprehensive Suit in S.D. Fla.

VOLKSWAGEN GROUP: Faces "Molwitz" Suit in D.N.J.
WAFFLE HOUSE: Certification of 3 Classes Sought in "Jones" Suit
WAL-MART STORES: Nikmanesh Seeks Certification of Five Classes
WEXFORD HEALTH: Kucinsky Seeks Certification of Prisoners Class
WHOLE FOODS: Recalls Kimchi Products Due to Fish & Nuts

WILD PURGE: "Stanat" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
WINDSOR PROPERTY: "Hughes" Sues Over Denied Pay Stubs
WORLDWIDE FLIGHT: "Bautista" Suit Seeks Wages Under Labor Code


                            *********


ABSOLUTE LAWN: Certification of Class Sought in "Bridges" Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in lawsuit titled TONY BRIDGES, JONAS THEOPHILE,
DEREK CHAIRS, and JUAN CALDERON, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated v. ABSOLUTE LAWN CARE LA, LLC, and
ROBERT L. ROGERS, Case No. 2:16-cv-00448-NJB-JCW (E.D. La.), move
for conditional certification and class certification.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=LZiMHJaE

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Christopher L. Williams, Esq.
          WILLIAMS LITIGATION, L.L.C.
          639 Loyola Ave., Suite 1850
          New Orleans, LA 70113
          Telephone: (504) 308-1438
          Facsimile: (504) 308-1446
          E-mail: chris@williamslitigation.com


ADVANTAGE MEDICAL: "Spine & Sports" Sues Over Faxed Ads
-------------------------------------------------------
Spine & Sports Chiropractic, Inc., individually, and as the
representatives of a class of similarly-situated persons,
Plaintiffs, v. Advantage Medical Equipment & Supply, Inc. and John
Does 1-10, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-01321-RLY-MPB (S.D. Ind.,
May 27, 2016), seeks actual monetary loss, enjoinment from
additional violations and pre-judgment interest, costs and such
further relief under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of
1991.

Spine & Sports Chiropractic is an Ohio corporation, operating a
medical clinic located at 4000 Indianola Avenue in Columbus, Ohio.

Advantage Medical is an Indiana corporation with its principal
place of business located at 12415 N. Old Meridian in Carmel, IN
46032. It sells medical supplies and other products primarily to
medical providers such as rehabilitation, physical therapy, and
primary care facilities. It allegedly sent faxed ads to the
Plaintiff without prior consent.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     George D. Jonson, Esq.
     Matthew E. Stubbs, Esq.
     MONTGOMERY, RENNIE & JONSON
     36 E. Seventh Street, Suite 2100
     Cincinnati, OH 45202
     Tel: (513) 241-4722
     Fax: (513) 241-8775 (fax)
     Email: gjonson@mrjlaw.com
            mstubbs@mrjlaw.com


AIR LIQUIDE: Certification of Class of Field Technicians Sought
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit entitled JOSEPH L. BRACKIN
Individually on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. AIR LIQUIDE INDUSTRIAL U.S., L.P., Case No.
2:15-cv-04945-GEKP (E.D. Pa.), moves for conditional certification
of a collective class of Field Service Technicians, under the Fair
Labor Standards Act, who were working for the Defendant, and
denied pay while on-call.

Mr. Brackin also seeks authority to send Court-supervised notice
to potential opt-in plaintiffs.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=QXd6nP11

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Christopher J. Delgaizo, Esq.
          KRAEMER MANES & ASSOCIATES, LLC
          1 150 1St Avenue, Suite 501
          King of Prussia, PA 19460
          Telephone: (610) 844-1779
          Facsimile: (610) 646-7436
          E-mail: CD@lawkm.com


ALABAMA, USA: Bids in "Dunn" Suit Denied Due to Impending Deal
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Myron H. Thompson entered an order in the lawsuit styled
JOSHUA DUNN, et al. v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his official capacity
as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.,
Case No. 2:14-cv-00601-MHT-TFM (M.D. Ala.).

In light of the pending joint motion for preliminary approval of
the parties' settlement of Phase 1, the Court ordered that the
pending motions related to the trial of that phase -- namely, the
Plaintiffs' motion for Phase 1 class certification, and the
parties' joint motion for entry of an order on Phase 1 trial
exhibits -- are denied with leave to renew should the Court not
approve the proposed settlement.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=D6Dryj3w


ALBERTVILLE, AL: Faces "Moore" Class Action
-------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against City of Albertville. The case is
captioned Carrie Moore and Gary Peppers, individually and for a
class of similarly situated persons or entities, the Plaintiff, v.
City of Albertville, a Municipal Corporation, the Defendant, Case
No. 4:16-cv-00914-VEH (N.D. Ala., June 1, 2016). The assigned
Judge is Virginia Emerson Hopkins.

Albertville is located in Marshall County in the northeast corner
of Alabama.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          G. Daniel Evans, Esq.
          Alexandria Parrish, Esq.
          THE EVANS LAW FIRM, P.C.
          1736 Oxmoor Road, Suite 101
          Birmingham, AL 35209
          Telephone: (205) 870 1970
          Facsimile: (205) 870 7763
          E-mail: gdevans@evanslawpc.com
                  ap@evanslawpc.com


ALICO INC: Stockholder Case Settlement Awaits Final Approval
------------------------------------------------------------
Alico, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2016, that the settlement of a consolidated class
action lawsuit remains subject to final judicial approval.

On March 11, 2015 a putative stockholder class action lawsuit
captioned Shiva Y. Stein v. Alico, Inc., et al., No. 15-CA-000645
(the "Stein lawsuit") was filed in the Circuit Court of the
Twentieth Judicial District in and for Lee County, Florida,
against Alico, Inc. ("Alico"), its current and certain former
directors, 734 Citrus Holdings, LLC d/b/a Silver Nip Citrus, 734
Investors, LLC ("734 Investors"), 734 Agriculture, LLC ("734
Agriculture") and 734 Sub, LLC ("734 Sub") in connection with the
acquisition of Silver Nip by Alico (the "Acquisition"). The
complaint alleges that Alico's directors at the time of the
Acquisition, 734 Investors, and 734 Agriculture, breached
fiduciary duties to Alico stockholders in connection with the
Acquisition, and that Silver Nip and 734 Sub aided and abetted
such breaches. The lawsuit seeks, among other things, monetary and
equitable relief, costs, fees (including attorneys' fees) and
expenses.

On May 6, 2015 a putative stockholder class action and derivative
lawsuit captioned Ruth S. Dimon Trust v. George R. Brokaw, et al.,
No. 15-CA-001162 (the "Dimon lawsuit") was filed in the Circuit
Court of the Twentieth Judicial District in and for Lee County,
Florida, against Alico, its current directors, Silver Nip Citrus,
734 Investors and 734 Agriculture, in connection with the
Acquisition of Silver Nip Citrus by Alico. The complaint alleges
claims for breach of fiduciary duty, gross mismanagement, waste of
corporate assets and tortious interference with contract against
Alico's directors, unjust enrichment against three of the
directors and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty against
Silver Nip Citrus, 734 investors and 734 Agriculture. The lawsuit
seeks, among other things, rescission of the Acquisition, an
injunction prohibiting certain payments to Silver Nip Citrus
members, unspecified damages, disgorgement of profits, costs, fees
(including attorneys' fees) and expenses.

On July 17, 2015 the plaintiffs in the Stein and Dimon lawsuits
filed a stipulation and proposed order consolidating their cases
for all purposes under the caption, In re Alico, Inc. Shareholder
Litigation, Master File No. 15-CA-000645 (the "Consolidated
Action") and seeking the appointment of a lead plaintiff and lead
and liaison counsel. The court entered that proposed order on July
21, 2015.

On October 16, 2015, the lead plaintiff in the Consolidated Action
reported to the Court that the parties reached an agreement in
principle to settle the Consolidated Action and other claims
related to the Acquisition and that they were in the process of
formally documenting their agreements. The proposed settlement
contemplates that Alico will adopt certain changes to its
corporate governance practices, policies and procedures concerning
related party transactions, that the Consolidated Action will be
dismissed and that all claims that were or could have been
asserted challenging any aspect of the Acquisition will be
released. On March 31, 2016, the parties entered into a
Stipulation of Settlement.  The parties filed an Amended
Stipulation of settlement with the Court on April 22, 2016.

On April 28, 2016, the Court entered an order preliminarily
approving the settlement and providing for notice to relevant
Alico shareholders.  The settlement remains subject to final
judicial approval following notice to the relevant Alico
shareholders and a settlement hearing at which the Court will
consider the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the
settlement. In connection with the proposed settlement, the
parties contemplate that plaintiffs' counsel will seek an award of
attorneys' fees and expenses. There can be no assurance that the
Court will approve the settlement.

Alico, Inc. is a Florida agribusiness and land management company
owning approximately 121,000 acres of land throughout Florida,
including approximately 90,000 acres of mineral rights.


ALLIED APPLIANCE: Old Town Pizza Seeks Certification of Class
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned OLD TOWN PIZZA OF LOMBARD,
INC., an Illinois corporation, individually and as the
representative of a class of similarly-situated persons v. ALLIED
APPLIANCE SALES COMPANY, SHIRLEY R. ZIMRING and JOHN DOES 1-10,
Case No. 1:16-cv-05254 (N.D. Ill.), submits its motion for class
certification pursuant to Damasco v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d
891, 896 (7th Cir. 2011).  The Plaintiff proposes this class
definition:

     All persons who (1) on or after four years prior to the
     filing of this action, (2) were sent telephone facsimile
     messages of material advertising the commercial availability
     or quality of any property, goods, or services by or on
     behalf of Defendants, and (3) which Defendants did not have
     prior express permission or invitation, or (4) which did not
     display a proper opt-out notice.

Old Town Pizza alleges that the Defendants sent it and others a
standardized form advertisement.  Old Town Pizza anticipates that
the proposed class definition will change after discovery defines
the precise contours of the class and the advertisements that were
sent.  Old Town Pizza asks for leave to submit a brief and other
evidence in support of the Motion after discovery about the class
elements has been completed.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=yjDZFasl

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brian J. Wanca, Esq.
          ANDERSON + WANCA
          3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500
          Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
          Telephone: (847) 368-1500
          Facsimile: (847) 368-1501
          E-mail: bwanca@andersonwanca.com


AM RETAIL: Faces "Ramos" Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against AM Retail Group, Inc. The case is
captioned Maria Ramos, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Does 1-100, inclusive and AM
Retail Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, the Defendant, Case
No. CGC 16 552324 (Cal. Super. Ct. June 1, 2016).

AM Retail operates retail stores in the United States. Its stores
offer men and women outerwear, as well as fashion accessories.


AMERICAN HONDA: Recalls Mini Tillers Due to Injury Risk
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
American Honda Motor Company, Inc., of Torrance, Calif., announced
a voluntary recall of about 219,000 Mini Tillers (in addition,
about 7,000 were sold in Canada). Consumers should stop using this
product unless otherwise instructed.  It is illegal to resell or
attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.

The throttle cable can be pinched during packaging, causing the
tiller tines to rotate unexpectedly when the lever is not engaged,
posing a risk of serious injury to consumers.

This recall involves Honda FG110K1AT Mini Tillers. The mini
tillers have gasoline engines that power rotating tines to dig
into the ground and cultivate the soil. The mini tillers are red
and black with "HONDA" printed on the front tine guard and are
about 14 inches wide by 39 inches tall. The serial number range
included in this recall is from FAAA-1200001 through 1540521. The
serial number is printed on the top side cover of the tillers.

Honda has received 30 reports of throttle cable damage. No
injuries have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/DVi89r

The recalled products were manufactured in U.S. and sold at Honda
Power Equipment dealers and Home Depot stores nationwide and
online at www.homedepot.com from December 2007 through March 2016
for between $350 and $380.

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled mini tillers
and contact their local authorized Honda dealer to schedule an
appointment to have the throttle cable inspected for damage and
repaired free of charge.


AMTECH SYSTEMS: $325,000 Fees and Expenses Paid in Full in April
----------------------------------------------------------------
Amtech Systems, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that BTU, its insurer(s),
or its successor(s) in interest are responsible for payment of
fees and expenses in the amount of $325,000 which were paid in
full on April 1, 2016.

On February 18, 2016, the Delaware Court entered the Order
approving the Amended Stipulation of Settlement. As a result, the
Released Claims were dismissed with prejudice and without any
admission of wrongdoing by any of the parties to the Stockholder
Actions. Pursuant to the Amended Stipulation of Settlement, BTU,
its insurer(s), or its successor(s) in interest are responsible
for payment of fees and expenses in the amount of $325,000 which
were paid in full on April 1, 2016.

Shortly after the Company entered into the merger agreement with
BTU, two separate putative stockholder class action complaints
(together, the "Stockholder Actions") were filed in the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware (the "Delaware Court"). The
first was filed on November 4, 2014 and the second on November 17,
2014, on behalf of BTU's public stockholders, against BTU, members
of the BTU board, Amtech and the special purpose merger
subsidiary. The Stockholder Actions were consolidated on December
4, 2014. The complaints generally alleged that, in connection with
entering into the merger agreement, the BTU board of directors
breached certain fiduciary duties owed to BTU's stockholders. The
complaints sought various forms of declaratory and injunctive
relief, as well as compensatory damages.

On February 18, 2016, the Delaware Court entered the Order
approving the Amended Stipulation of Settlement. As a result, the
Released Claims were dismissed with prejudice and without any
admission of wrongdoing by any of the parties to the Stockholder
Actions. Pursuant to the Amended Stipulation of Settlement, BTU,
its insurer(s), or its successor(s) in interest are responsible
for payment of fees and expenses in the amount of $325,000 which
were paid in full on April 1, 2016.

The Released Claims are limited solely to claims related to any
disclosures (or lack thereof) to BTU's stockholders concerning the
merger and any fiduciary claims concerning the decision to enter
into the merger.

"While we are currently unaware of any other pending or threatened
litigation related to additional claims arising from the
Stockholder Actions, any future claims are uncertain, so
additional harm could potentially result to the Company from this
litigation, which may cause the Company to incur substantial costs
and divert management's attention from operational matters," the
Company said.


APPLIED UNDERWRITERS: Faces Tapia Suit in S.D.N.Y.
--------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Applied Underwriters Captive Risk
Assurance. The case is captioned Ronal Elizaul Guerrero Tapia, on
behalf of himself and others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v.
Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Inc., Case
No. 1:16-cv-04018 (S.D.N.Y., May 30, 2016).

The lawsuit was filed pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.


BANK OF AMERICA: "Kansas City" Sues Over Anti-Trust Violations
--------------------------------------------------------------
Kansas City, Missouri Employees Retirement System, on behalf of
itself and all others similarly situated, v. Bank of America
Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner
& Smith Incorporated, Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays
Capital Inc., BNP Paribas, S.A., BNP Paribas Securities Corp.,
Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Global Markets Inc.,
Citigroup Global Markets Limited, Credit Suisse AG, Credit Suisse
Group AG, Credit Suisse International, Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. , The
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. , Goldman, Sachs & Co., Goldman Sachs
Bank USA, Goldman Sachs Financial Markets, L.P., Goldman Sachs
International, HSBC Bank PLC, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC Securities
(USA) Inc., Icap Capital Markets LLC, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.,
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, J.P.
Morgan Securities PLC, Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A.,
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Capital Services LLC,
Morgan Stanley Derivative Products Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co.
International PLC, Morgan Stanley Bank International Limited, The
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, RBS
Securities Inc., Tradeweb Markets LLC, UBS AG and UBS Securities
LLC, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-4005 (S.D. N.Y., May 27, 2016),
seeks treble damages and injunctive relief for violation of
Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

Defendants are the primary incumbent dealers of interest rate
swaps in the United States and collectively dominate the market.
Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants' anticompetitive conduct in
the market for interest rate swaps lack the price transparency and
effective competition of accepting bids and offers from anonymous
market participants to match that of willing buyers and sellers at
a competitive real-time price.

The Defendants are represented by:

     Blair A. Nicholas, Esq.
     Benjamin Galdston, Esq.
     David Kaplan, Esq.
     Lucas Gilmore, Esq.
     Brandon Marsh, Esq.
     BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP
     12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
     San Diego, CA 92130
     Tel: (858) 720-3183
     Fax: (858) 793-0323
     Email: blairn@blbglaw.com
            benjaming@blbglaw.com
            davidk@blbglaw.com
            lucasg@blbglaw.com
            brandonm@blbglaw.com

          - and -

     Scott Martin, Esq.
     HAUSFELD LLP
     33 Whitehall Street
     14th Floor
     New York, NY 10004
     Tel: (646) 357-1100
     Fax: (212) 202-4322
     Email: smartin@hausfeld.com

          - and -

     Michael D. Hausfeld, Esq.
     William B. Butterfield, Esq.
     Swathi Bojedla, Esq.
     HAUSFELD LLP
     1700 K Street NW, Suite 650
     Washington, DC 20006
     Tel: (202) 540-7200
     Fax: (202) 540-7201
     Email: mhausfeld@hausfeld.com
            wbutterfield@hausfeld.com
            sbojedla@hausfeld.com

          - and -

     Michael P. Lehmann, Esq.
     Bonny E. Sweeney, Esq.
     Christopher L. Lebsock, Esq.
     HAUSFELD LLP
     600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3200
     San Francisco, CA 94111
     Tel: (415) 633-1908
     Fax: (415) 358-4980
     Email: mlehmann@hausfeld.com
            bsweeney@hausfeld.com
            clebsock@hausfeld.com


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY: Sued in Fla. Over Deceptive Trade Practices
---------------------------------------------------------------
Esteban Galan and Noremy Perez, individually, and on behalf of
themselves, and all others similarly situated, the Plaintiffs, v.
Berkshire Hathaway Automotive, Inc., a Delaware corporation, dba
Serramonte Ford; San Mateo Credit Union, a California corporation;
Safeamerica Credit Union, a California corporation, and Does 1-
500, inclusive, the Defendants, Case No. 0:15-cv-62634-PAS (S.D.
Fla., June 1, 2016), seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, and,
amount in controversy, including Plaintiffs' statutory claim for
award of reasonable attorney's fees as a result of Defendants
alleged false and misleading representations, and failures to
provide mandatory disclosures and/or unfair and deceptive
practices, in violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Rees-
Levering Motor Vehicle Sales and Finance Act, California Business
and Professions Code, Untrue, and False and/or Misleading
Advertisement.

Berkshire buys repairs and re-sells used vehicles to the general
public, and, takes vehicles in trade.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Louis A. Liberty, Esq.
          LOUIS LIBERTY & ASSOCIATES, PLC
          553 Pilgrim Drive, Suite A
          Foster City, CA 94404
          Telephone: (650) 341 0300
          Facsimile: (650) 403 1783
          E-mail: lou@carlawyer.com

               - and -

          Michael R. Wendlberger, Esq.
          533 Airport Blvd., Suite 400
          Burlingame, CA 94010
          E-mail: mike@mrwesq.com


BIG T ENERGY: "Schones" Suit to Recover Minimum, Overtime Pay
-------------------------------------------------------------
Cody Schones and Leo Calvillo, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Big T Energy Services,
LLC, and Apache Corporation, Defendants, Case No. 5:16-cv-00483-FB
(W.D. Tex., May 27, 2016), seeks actual damages in the amount of
unpaid overtime wages, damages in the amount of unpaid minimum
wages, liquidated damages, post-judgment interest, costs and
reasonable attorney fees and all other relief pursuant to the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Plaintiffs worked as pumpers/lease hands on Apache Leases and were
labeled as independent contractors by Big T and/or Apache. Apache
held leases in the Permian Basin with numerous oil and/or gas
wells with Big T energy providing labor requirements to Apache.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Allen R. Vaught, Esq.
     Baron & Budd, P.C.
     3102 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 1100
     Dallas, TX 75219
     Tel: (214) 521-3605
     Fax: (214) 520-1181
     Email: vaught@baronbudd.com

          - and -

     Glenn D. Levy, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF GLENN D. LEVY
     906 Basse Road, Suite 100
     San Antonio, TX 78212
     Telephone: (210) 822-5666
     Facsimile: (210) 822-5650
     Email: glenn@glennlevylaw.com


BLAIN SUPPLY: Certification of Class Sought in "Serifoski" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff moves the Court to certify the class described in
the complaint of the lawsuit titled MEFAIL SERIFOSKI, Individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. BLAIN SUPPLY,
INC., d/b/a BLAIN'S FARM & FLEET, and SYNCHRONY BANK, Case No.
2:16-cv-00656-WED (E.D. Wisc.).  The Plaintiff further asks the
Court both to stay the motion for class certification and to grant
the Plaintiff (and the Defendant) relief from the Local Rules
setting automatic briefing schedules and requiring briefs and
supporting material to be filed with the Motion.

To avoid the risk of a defendant mooting a putative class
representative's individual stake in the litigation, the Seventh
Circuit in Damasco instructed plaintiffs to file a certification
motion with the complaint, along with a motion to stay briefing on
the certification motion until discovery could commence.  Damasco
v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled,
Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015).

As this motion to certify a class is a placeholder motion as
described in Damasco, the parties and the Court should not be
burdened with unnecessary paperwork and the resulting expense when
a one paragraph, single page motion to certify and stay should
suffice until an amended motion is filed, the Plaintiff contends.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=yAKOJCek

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Shpetim Ademi, Esq.
          John D. Blythin, Esq.
          Mark A. Eldridge, Esq.
          ADEMI & O'REILLY, LLP
          3620 East Layton Avenue
          Cudahy, WI 53110
          Telephone: (414) 482-8000
          Facsimile: (414) 482-8001
          E-mail: sademi@ademilaw.com
                  jblythin@ademilaw.com
                  meldridge@ademilaw.com


BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Faces 2 Lawsuits in Conn. Super. Ct.
----------------------------------------------------------
Two class action lawsuits have been filed against Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, in Connecticut
Superior Court, Hartford Judicial District.

The lawsuits seek compensatory, consequential and punitive
damages, as a result of Defendants' reckless disregard for safety
of patients, to whom Pradaxa (TM) was promoted and sold for use,
and as a direct and proximate consequence of Defendants' reckless
disregard for patient safety, in violations of the Connecticut
Products Liability Act.

According to the complaints, the Defendants negligently designed
and formulated Pradaxa (TM) and its packaging, labeling,
prescribing information and patient medication guide which
rendered Pradaxa (TM) defective.

The Defendants were engaged in the business of designing,
licensing, manufacturing, distributing, selling, marketing, and/or
introducing into interstate commerce, either directly or
indirectly through third parties or related entities, the
prescription anticoagulant drug sold under the name Pradaxa (TM),
throughout the State of Connecticut. Pradaxa (TM) helps to prevent
platelets in blood from sticking together and forming a blood
clot.

The cases are:

-- Sarah Mast, and others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and Boehringer
Ingelheim International Gmbh, the Defendants, Consolidated Pradaxa
Docket.

Plaintiff's Counsel

          Neal L. Moskow, Esq.
          URY & MOSKOW, LLC
          833 Black Rock Turnpike
          Fairfield, CT 06825
          Telephone: (203) 610 6393
          Facsimile: (203) 610 6399
          E-mail: neal@urymoskow.com

-- Lillie Patterson, and others similarly situated, the Plaintiff,
v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and Boehringer
Ingelheim International Gmbh, the Defendants (Case No. HHD-CV-16-
6068752-S, June 1, 2016)

Plaintiff's Counsel

          Neal L. Moskow, Esq.
          URY & MOSKOW, LLC
          833 Black Rock Turnpike
          Fairfield, CT 06825
          Telephone: (203) 610 6393
          Facsimile:(203) 610 6399
          E-mail: neal@urymoskow.com


BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: 5 Suits Filed in Conn. Over Pradaxa (R)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Five cases were filed on May 27 against Boehringer Ingelheim
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in Connecticut Superior Court. The lawsuits
allege that dabigatran etexilate mesylate or Pradaxa (R) caused
gastrointestinal bleeding as a result of ingestion as treatment
for non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Boehringer is a Delaware pharmaceutical corporation with its
principal place of business at 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield,
Connecticut 06877. It is a subsidiary of Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
based in Binger Strasse 173, 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany. It
directly or through their agents, manufactured, marketed,
advertised, distributed, promoted, labeled, tested and sold
Pradaxa.

The cases are:

-- Douglas Ramey v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmBH, Case No: HHD-CV-16-
6068658-S.

-- Robert Walden v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmBH, Defendants, Case No. HHD-
CV-16-6067827-S.

Nancy Feather, Plaintiff, v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH, Defendants, Case
No. HHD-CV-16-6068655-S.

Kenneth Tingley, Plaintiff, v. Boehringer Ingelheim
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH,
Defendants, Case No. HHD-CV-16-6068656-S

Plaintiffs are represented by:

      Neal L. Moskow, Esq.
      URY & MOSKOW, LLC
      833 Black Rock Turnpike
      Fairfield, CT 06825
      Tel. 203-610-6393
      Fax. 203-610-6399
      Email: neal@urymoskow.com

             - and -

      Russell T. Abney, Esq.
      Ferrer, Poirot Wansbrough Feller Daniel Abney & Linville
      2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 720
      Atlanta, GA 30328
      Tel: 800-521-4492
      Fax: 214-526-6026
      Email: rabney@lawyerworks.com

-- Alicia Kalka, individually, as next of kin and as personal
representative of the estate of Betty Lawson, deceased, v.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer
Ingelheim International GmbH, Defendants, Case No. HHD-CV-16-
6068653-S.

Plaintiff is represented by:

      Neal L. Moskow, Esq.
      URY & MOSKOW, LLC
      833 Black Rock Turnpike
      Fairfield, CT 06825
      Tel. 203-610-6393
      Fax. 203-610-6399
      Email: neal@urymoskow.com

             - and -

      Lynn Seithel, Esq.
      SEITHEL LAW FIRM
      John's Island, SC 29457
      Tel. 843-557-1699
      Fax. 800-818-0433
      Email: lynn@seithellaw.com

             - and -

      Ellen A. Presby, Esq.
      NUMEROFF LAW FIRM
      2626 Cole Ave, Suite 450
      Dallas, TX 75204
      Tel. 214-774-2258
      Fax. 214-393-7897
      Email: ellenpresby@numerofflaw.com


BOX COMPONENTS: Recalls Bicycle Forks Due to Fall Hazard
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Box Components Inc., of Anaheim, Calif., announced a voluntary
recall of about 4,100 Bicycle forks. Consumers should stop using
this product unless otherwise instructed.  It is illegal to resell
or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.

The steer tube can become loose in the crown of the fork, posing a
fall hazard.

This recall involves Box Components' carbon fiber BMX bicycle
forks. The forks are black with "BOX" printed in white on the
side. The model numbers are printed in white letters on the front
face of fork crown. The affected models have one of the following
three serial numbers printed above the crown: 140508, 140606 or
140702. The affected models include:

Model Numbers       Specification
-------------      -------------
XE                 20 inch, 10 mm
XE                 24 inch, 10 mm
XL                 20 inch, 10 mm
XL                 24 inch, 10 mm
XS                 20 inch, 10 mm

Box Components has received 242 reports of loosened tubes. No
falls or injuries have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/Q0PrII

The recalled products were manufactured in China and sold at
Independent bike shops and online at www.danscomp.com and
www.jrbicycles.com from July 2013 through April 2015 for about
$300.

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled forks and
contact Box Components for a free replacement bicycle fork.


BROAN-NUTONE LLC: Recalls Ventilation Fans Due to Fire Hazard
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Broan-NuTone LLC, of Hartford, Wis., announced a voluntary recall
of about 450 Ventilation fans in U.S. (in addition, 200 were sold
in Canada). Consumers should stop using this product unless
otherwise instructed.  It is illegal to resell or attempt to
resell a recalled consumer product.

The fan motor can overheat, posing a fire hazard.

This recall involves L500 series fans designed to circulate air in
and out of a home or building. The fans were sold in nine brands
and have the model information printed on the specification label
affixed to the blower assembly. Fans included in the recall are:

  Brand Name             Model Number
  ----------             ------------
  Broan                  L500, L500K, L500KL, L500L, S97014819,
                         S97014820, S99080487
  Twin City Fan          T500, T500L
  Carnes                 VCDD050C, VCDD050I
  Acme Eng and Mfg Co    VQL500, VQ500
  WW Grainger            1AAD3, 4TR58, 4TR59, 4YG83
  Captive Aire           CFA500
  American CoolAir       CFL50A1151
  Solar and Palau        FFC500, FF500
  American Coolair Corp. IL50LA1151

No consumer incidents have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/YjMKpj

The recalled products were manufactured in U.S. and sold at
Heating, plumbing and building supply retailers nationwide and
online from February 2016 through March 2016 for about $240.

Consumers should immediately turn off and unplug the recalled fans
and contact Broan to receive a free replacement fan.


BROWARD COUNTY, FL: Certification of Class Sought in "Ruffino"
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit captioned DANIEL RUFFINO, ROSANNE
CASALE, FRANTZ PIERRE, MOHAMMAD BUTT, MIDDLE RIVER ENTERPRISES
INC. d/b/a DIAMOND CAB OF BROWARD COUNTY, CROSSTOWN TRANSPORTATION
INC., and S & R SERVICE INC., on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated v. BROWARD COUNTY, a political
subdivision of Florida, Case No. 0:15-cv-62312-PAS (S.D. Fla.),
move the Court for an order certifying a class, which is
subdivided and defined as:

     (a) All individuals or entities that owned a Broward Taxicab
         Certificate prior to January 1, 2015 and still own said
         Certificate ("Taxi Certificate Class"); and

     (b) All individuals or entities that owned a Broward Luxury
         Sedan Certificate prior to January 1, 2015 and still own
         said Certificate ("Sedan Certificate Class").

The Plaintiffs allege that they brought the Action for themselves
and for the hundreds of taxi and sedan certificate owners to seek
redress and relief under constitutional law after Broward County
amended its Motor Carriers Ordinance last year.  The Plaintiffs
contend that the County's amended Ordinance unconstitutionally
created an arbitrary, unjust system with substantial disparities
between those who engage in the very same business -- i.e.
transporting individual passengers in a vehicle for-hire.  They
insist that those 2015 amendments also decimated property rights
that had been well established by unique aspects of the Ordinance
and the County's long-standing practices.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=vd8WXJ3T

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Robert W. Kelley, Esq.
          Cristina M. Pierson, Esq.
          Kimberly L. Wald, Esq.
          KELLEY UUSTAL, PLC
          500 North Federal Highway, Suite 200
          Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
          Telephone: (954) 522-6601
          E-mail: rwk@kulaw.com
                  cmp@kulaw.com
                  klw@kulaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Rene D. Harrod, Esq.
          Annika E. Ashton, Esq.
          Joni Armstrong Coffey, Esq.
          BROWARD COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
          Governmental Center, Suite 423
          115 South Andrews Avenue
          Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
          Telephone: (954) 357-7600
          E-mail: reneharrod@gmail.com
                  annika.ashton@gmail.com


BURGER'S OZARK: Recalls Pulled Pork Products Due to Misbranding
---------------------------------------------------------------
Burger's Ozark County Cured, a California, Mo. establishment, is
recalling approximately 150 pounds of pulled pork products due to
misbranding, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) announced today.

The seasoned pulled pork items were produced and packaged on
January 26, 2016. The product has the correct label on the front,
but an incorrect label for a beef brisket product on the back. The
following products are subject to recall:

  --- 1-lb. microwaveable tray packages containing "Burger's
      Smokehouse Signature Sauce Seasoned Pulled Pork with
      Barbeque Sauce."

The products subject to recall bear establishment number "EST.
1161" inside the USDA mark of inspection and contain case code
P816W with a use by/freeze by date of August 13, 2016. These items
were shipped to retail locations in Missouri.

The problem was discovered through a customer who called the
company's service line.

There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to
consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an injury or
illness should contact a healthcare provider.


BUTTERFIELD FOODS: Recalls Broccoli Salad Dressing Products
-----------------------------------------------------------
Butterfield Foods, LLC., a Noblesville, Ind. establishment, is
recalling approximately 15,966 pounds of broccoli salad dressing
product that may be adulterated with Listeria monocytogenes, the
U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection
Service (FSIS) announced today.

The broccoli salad kit items were produced on various dates
between Nov. 10, 2015 and May 25, 2016. The following product is
subject to recall:

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product
       labeled "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli
       Salad Kit" with a packaging date of 11/10/2015, bearing
       lot number 5314129,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 11/17/2015, bearing lot
      number 5321221,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 11/25/2015, bearing lot
      number 5328328,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 12/8/2015, bearing lot number
      5342116,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 12/15/2015, bearing lot
      number 5349219,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product
      labeled "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli
      Salad Kit" with a packaging date of 12/23/2015, bearing lot
      number 5356297,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 12/31/2015, bearing lot
      number 5363410,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 2/2/2016, bearing lot number
      6033071,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 2/9/2016, bearing lot number
      6040142,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 2/16/2016, bearing lot number
      6047305,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 2/25/2016, bearing lot number
      6054450,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 3/2/2016, bearing lot number
      6061048,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 3/9/2016, bearing lot number
      6068141,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 3/16/2016, bearing lot number
      6075273,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 3/30/2016, bearing lot number
      6089507,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 4/12/2016, bearing lot number
      6103161,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 4/19/2016, bearing lot number
      6110244,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 4/26/2016, bearing lot number
      6117342,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 5/5/2016, bearing lot number
      6124070,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 5/12/2016, bearing lot number
      6131130,

  --- 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
      "Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad
      Kit" with a packaging date of 5/18/2016, bearing lot number
      6138250, and

And 6-lb. cases containing two 3-lb packages of product labeled
"Butterfield Foods Custom Food Production Broccoli Salad Kit" with
a packaging date of 5/25/2016, bearing lot number 6145367.
The product subject to recall bears establishment number EST. 6945
inside the USDA mark of inspection. The product has sell-by dates
from December 10, 2015 through June 23, 2016. These items were
shipped to retail locations in Indiana and Ohio and used to make
prepared salad products further distributed to consumers at
grocery delicatessens.

The problem was discovered on June 2, 2016, when the establishment
was notified by its distributor that the SunOpta sunflower kernel
products used in the Butterfield Foods' Broccoli Salad Kit
dressing product were involved in a recall due to possible
contamination with Listeria monocytogenes. There have been no
confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of the
Butterfield Foods product being recalled.

SunOpta's recall can be found at:
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm504808.htm.

Consumption of food contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes can
cause listeriosis, a serious infection that primarily affects
older adults, persons with weakened immune systems, and pregnant
women and their newborns. Less commonly, persons outside these
risk groups are affected.

Listeriosis can cause fever, muscle aches, headache, stiff neck,
confusion, loss of balance and convulsions sometimes preceded by
diarrhea or other gastrointestinal symptoms. An invasive infection
spreads beyond the gastrointestinal tract. In pregnant women, the
infection can cause miscarriages, stillbirths, premature delivery
or life-threatening infection of the newborn. In addition, serious
and sometimes fatal infections can occur in older adults and
persons with weakened immune systems. Listeriosis is treated with
antibiotics. Persons in the higher-risk categories who experience
flu-like symptoms within two months after eating contaminated food
should seek medical care and tell the health care provider about
eating the contaminated food.

Consumers who have purchased prepared salad products that contain
the recalled product from grocery delicatessens are urged not to
consume them. These prepared salad products should be thrown away
or returned to the place of purchase. If you are unsure whether or
not the recalled product was used in your prepared salads, consult
store management.


CASHFORIPHONES.COM: "Washington" Suit Moved from S.D. Cal to Nev.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Helaina Washington, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Cashforiphones.com, formerly
known as: Cashforlaptops.com, the Defendant, Case No. 3:15-cv-
00627, was transferred from the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of California, to the U.S. District Court for
the District of Nevada (Reno). The Nevada District Court assigned
Case No. 3:16-cv-00300-LRH-WGC to the proceeding.

Cashforiphones.com sells brand new, used or broken iPhones.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Gillian L. Wade, Esq.
          Sara Dawn Avila, Esq.
          MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP
          2800 Donald Douglas Loop North
          Santa Monica, CA 90405
          Telephone: (310) 396 9600
          Facsimile: (310) 396 9635

               - and -

          Kenneth J. Grunfeld, Esq.
          Richard M. Golomb, Esq.
          Ruben Honik, Esq.
          Tammi Markowitz, Esq.
          GOLOMB & HONIK, P.C.
          1515 Market Street, Suite 1100
          Philadelphia, PA 19102
          Telephone: (215) 985 9177
          Facsimile: (215) 985 4169
          E-mail: kgrunfeld@golombhonik.com
                  rgolomb@golombhonik.com

               - and -

          Todd D. Carpenter, Esq.
          CARLSON LYNCH SWEET
          KILPELA & CARPENTER LLP
          402 West Broadway, 29th Floor
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 756 6994
          Facsimile: (619) 756 6991

The Defendant is represented by:

          Robert J. Angres, Esq.
          ROBERT J. ANGRES, LTD.
          2650 Friesian Ct.
          Reno, NV 89521
          Telephone: (775) 852 5244
          Facsimile: (775) 852 5266
          E-mail: rjangres@gmail.com


CBL & ASSOCIATES: "French" Sues Over Share Price Drop
-----------------------------------------------------
Tommy French, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., Stephen
D. Lebovitz and Farzana K. Mitchell, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-
00165 (E.D. Tenn., May 27, 2016), seeks compensatory and punitive
damages, damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest,
reasonable attorney fees and experts fees and other costs and
disbursements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

CBL is a real estate investment trust and is an active owner and
developer of malls and shopping centers in the United States,
owning holding interests in, or managing more than 140 properties
across 31 states. CBL is under investigation by both the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the SEC for allegedly inflating the
Company's rental income and occupancy rates for its properties
when providing those figures to banks when applying for financing
arrangements. CBL stock fell by $0.86, nearly 9% on heavy volume,
to close at $9.40 on May 25, 2016. This represented a loss in
market capitalization of approximately $150 million. CBL made
materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to
disclose material facts about the Company and failed to disclose
to its shareholders that certain financing arrangements were
obtained through fraud and/or misrepresentation.

French acquired and held shares of the CBL at artificially
inflated prices and lost substantially.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Paul Kent Bramlett, Esq.
     Robert Preston Bramlett, Esq.
     BRAMLETT LAW OFFICES
     40 Burton Hills Blvd., Suite 200
     P. O. Box 150734
     Nashville, TN 37215
     Telephone:615.248.2828
     Facsimile: 866.816.4116
     Email: PKNASHLAW@aol.com
            Robert@BramlettLawOffices.com

          - and -

     Jeffrey C. Block
     Steven P. Harte
     Bradley J. Vettraino
     BLOCK & LEVITON LLC
     155 Federal Street, Suite 400
     Boston, MA 02110
     Telephone: (617) 398-5600
     Facsimile: (617) 507-6020
     Email: jeff@blockesq.com
            steven@blockesq.com
            bradley@blockesq.com


CLEARSPRING LOAN: Babbitt Seeks Certification of Two Classes
------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit styled CONNIE L. BABBITT and DAVID
L. BABBITT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated v. CLEARSPRING LOAN SERVICES, INC., Case No. 1:15-cv-
01164-RJJ-PJG (W.D. Mich.), move for an order certifying two
proposed classes of persons similarly situated to them:

     (1) The "FDCPA Class" is defined as:

         (a) Each and every natural person with a Michigan
         mailing address; (b) to whom ClearSpring sent a Loan
         Statement in any of the forms contained in Exhibit 2 at
         pages 24-49; (c) which was sent in an attempt to collect
         a debt incurred by the person for personal, family or
         household purposes; (d) which was not returned as
         undeliverable by the post office; where (e)
         ClearSpring's records show the loan account was
         delinquent at the time ClearSpring became the servicer
         or owner of the loan; and (f) the Loan Statement was
         sent between January 5, 2015 and the date on which the
         FDCPA Class is certified; and

     (2) The "MOC Class" is defined as:

         (a) Each and every natural person with a Michigan
         mailing address; (b) to whom ClearSpring sent a Loan
         Statement in any of the forms contained in Exhibit 2 at
         pages 24-49; (c) which was sent in an attempt to collect
         a debt incurred by the person for personal, family or
         household purposes; (d) which was not returned as
         undeliverable by the post office; where (e)
         ClearSpring's records show the loan account was
         delinquent at the time ClearSpring became the servicer
         or owner of the loan; and (f) the Loan Statement was
         sent between January 5, 2010 and the date on which the
         FDCPA Class is certified.

The Plaintiffs have alleged a uniform, routine practice by
Defendant ClearSpring Loan Services, Inc. -- the use of a form of
Loan Statement not containing required disclosure language --
which is unlawful under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and
the Michigan Occupational Code.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=5vE5C7be

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Theodore J. Westbrook, Esq.
          Amanda P. Narvaes, Esq.
          John E. Anding, Esq.
          DREW, COOPER & ANDING, P.C.
          Aldrich Place, Suite 200
          80 Ottawa Avenue, N.W.
          Grand Rapids, MI 49503
          Telephone: (616) 454-8300
          E-mail: twestbrook@dca-lawyers.com
                  anarvaes@dca-lawyers.com
                  janding@dca-lawyers.com

               - and -

          Steven A. Jacobs, Esq.
          SCHNEIDERMAN & SHERMAN, P.C.
          23938 Research Drive, Suite 300
          Farmington Hills, MI 48335
          Telephone: (248) 539-7400
          E-mail: sjacobs@sspclegal.com


CLOUGHERTY PACKING: Faces "Salazar" Wage and Hour Suit in Calif.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Andres Salazar, individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated, the Plaintiff, v. Clougherty Packing, LLC, dba Farmer
John, a Delaware limited liability corporation; Hormel Foods
Corporation, a Delaware corporation; and Does 1-20, inclusive, the
Defendants, Case No. BC622487 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 1, 2016),
seeks monetary relief including minimum wages, overtime wages, and
meal periods compensation.

According to the complaint, the Defendants allegedly engaged in
systematic pattern of wage and hour violations under California
Labor Code and Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders, all of
which contribute to Defendants' deliberate unfair completion.

The Defendants are providers of meat products throughout the West
Coast of the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Kashif Haque, Esq.
          Samuel A. Wong, Esq.
          Jessica L. Campbell, Esq.
          AEGIS LAW FIRM, PC
          9811 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 100
          Irvine, CA 92618
          Telephone: (949) 379 6250
          Facsimile: (949) 379 6251
          E-mail: khaque@aegislawfirm.com
                  swong@aegislawfirm.com


CMRE FINANCIAL: Certification of Class Sought in "Neldner" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Neldner moves the Court to certify the class described
in the complaint of the lawsuit entitled CHRISTOPHER NELDNER,
Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v.
CMRE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Case No. 2:16-cv-00638-PP (E.D.
Wisc.).

Mr. Neldner further asks the Court both to stay the motion for
class certification and to grant him (and the Defendant) relief
from the Local Rules setting automatic briefing schedules and
requiring briefs and supporting material to be filed with the
Motion.

To avoid the risk of a defendant mooting a putative class
representative's individual stake in the litigation, the Seventh
Circuit in Damasco instructed plaintiffs to file a certification
motion with the complaint, along with a motion to stay briefing on
the certification motion until discovery could commence.  Damasco
v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled,
Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015).

As this motion to certify a class is a placeholder motion as
described in Damasco, the parties and the Court should not be
burdened with unnecessary paperwork and the resulting expense when
a one paragraph, single page motion to certify and stay should
suffice until an amended motion is filed, the Plaintiff contends.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=qhre5tyA

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Shpetim Ademi, Esq.
          John D. Blythin, Esq.
          Mark A. Eldridge, Esq.
          ADEMI & O'REILLY, LLP
          3620 East Layton Avenue
          Cudahy, WI 53110
          Telephone: (414) 482-8000
          Facsimile: (414) 482-8001
          E-mail: sademi@ademilaw.com
                  jblythin@ademilaw.com
                  meldridge@ademilaw.com


COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY: Kaczynski Seeks Certification of Class
-------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Kaczynski moves the court to certify the class described in
the complaint of the lawsuit entitled BRIAN KACZYNSKI,
Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v.
COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Case No. 2:16-cv-00659-CNC (E.D.
Wisc.).  The Plaintiff further asks that the Court both stay the
motion for class certification and to grant the Plaintiff (and the
Defendant) relief from the Local Rules setting automatic briefing
schedules and requiring briefs and supporting material to be filed
with the Motion.

To avoid the risk of a defendant mooting a putative class
representative's individual stake in the litigation, the Seventh
Circuit in Damasco instructed plaintiffs to file a certification
motion with the complaint, along with a motion to stay briefing on
the certification motion until discovery could commence.  Damasco
v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled,
Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015).

As this motion to certify a class is a placeholder motion as
described in Damasco, the parties and the Court should not be
burdened with unnecessary paperwork and the resulting expense when
a one paragraph, single page motion to certify and stay should
suffice until an amended motion is filed, the Plaintiff argues.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=NwQqjCPh

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Shpetim Ademi, Esq.
          John D. Blythin, Esq.
          Mark A. Eldridge, Esq.
          ADEMI & O'REILLY, LLP
          3620 East Layton Avenue
          Cudahy, WI 53110
          Telephone: (414) 482-8000
          Facsimile: (414) 482-8001
          E-mail: sademi@ademilaw.com
                  jblythin@ademilaw.com
                  meldridge@ademilaw.com


COMPUTER SCIENCES: Strauch Seeks Certification of Three Classes
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit titled JOSEPH STRAUCH, TIMOTHY
COLBY, CHARLES TURNER, and VERNON CARRE, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. COMPUTER SCIENCES
CORPORATION, Case No. 3:14-cv-00956-JBA (D. Conn.), ask the Court
to enter an order certifying these proposed classes:

     Connecticut Class: All persons who were, are, or will be
     employed by CSC in Connecticut as Associate Professional
     System Administrators, Professional System Administrators,
     and Senior Professional System Administrators, at any time
     from July 1, 2012 through the date of the final disposition
     of this action, who earn or earned less than $100,000 in
     total annual compensation, and who were not members of the
     "Test and Training Ranges" segment ("TTR") of CSC.  The
     Connecticut Class contains two subclasses: (1) the Associate
     Professional and Professional System Administrators defined
     above; and (2) the Senior Professional System Administrators
     defined above.

     California Class: All persons who were, are, or will be
     employed by CSC in California as Associate Professional
     System Administrators, Professional System Administrators,
     and Senior Professional System Administrators, at any time
     from July 1, 2010 through the date of the final disposition
     of this action, who earn or earned less than $100,000 in
     total annual compensation, and who were not members of the
     TTR segment of CSC. The California Class contains two
     subclasses: (1) the Associate Professional System
     Administrators and Professional System Administrators
     defined above; and (2) the Senior Professional System
     Administrators defined above.

     North Carolina Class: All persons who were, are, or will be
     employed by CSC in North Carolina as Associate Professional
     System Administrators, Professional System Administrators,
     and Senior Professional System Administrators, at any time
     from July 1, 2012 through the date of the final disposition
     of this action, who earn or earned less than $100,000 in
     total annual compensation, and who were not a members of the
     TTR segment of CSC. The North Carolina Class contains two
     subclasses: (1) the Associate Professional System
     Administrators and Professional System Administrators
     defined above; and (2) the Senior Professional System
     Administrators defined above.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to appoint their counsel as
Class Counsel and to direct counsel to disseminate notice to the
class.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=h6rSMn0P

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jahan C. Sagafi, Esq.
          OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
          One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (415) 638-8800
          E-mail: jsagafi@outtengolden.com

               - and -

          Michael J. Scimone, Esq.
          Michael N. Litrownik, Esq.
          Elizabeth V. Stork, Esq.
          OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
          3 Park Avenue, 29th Floor
          New York, New York 10016
          Telephone: (212) 245-1000
          E-mail: mscimone@outtengolden.com
                  mlitrownik@outtengolden.com
                  estork@outtengolden.com

               - and -

          Karen B. Kravetz, Esq.
          SUSMAN, DUFFY & SEGALOFF, P.C.
          P.O. Box 1684
          New Haven, CT 06507
          Telephone: (203) 624-9830
          E-mail: kkravetz@susmanduffy.com

               - and -

          Todd Jackson, Esq.
          Genevieve Casey, Esq.
          FEINBERG, JACKSON, WORTHMAN & WASOW LLP
          476 9th Street
          Oakland, CA 94607
          Telephone: (510) 839-6824
          E-mail: todd@feinbergjackson.com
                  genevieve@feinbergjackson.com

               - and -

          Kelly M. Dermody, Esq.
          Daniel M. Hutchinson, Esq.
          Lin Y. Chan, Esq.
          Michael Levin-Gesundheit, Esq.
          LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP
          275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (415) 956-1000
          E-mail: kdermody@lchb.com
                  dhutchinson@lchb.com
                  lchan@lchb.com
                  mlevin-gesundheit@lchb.com


CONWAY PROWASH: Class Certification Bid in "Steimel" Suit Tossed
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Paul L. Maloney opinion and order in the lawsuit entitled
TROY STEIMEL v. CONWAY PROWASH, LLC, PREVENTION FIRE AND SAFETY
LLC, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LLC, and BARDLEY BEHRENDT, Case No.
1:15-cv-00599-PLM (W.D. Mich.):

   -- granting the Defendants' motion for summary judgment;

   -- dismissing with prejudice Mr. Steimel's claim under the
      Fair Labor Standards Act; and

   -- dismissing without prejudice Mr. Steimel's state-law claim
      and his motion for class certification.

In his lawsuit, Mr. Steimel brings a class action and collective
action, both on his own behalf and also on behalf of others.  For
his collective action claim, Mr. Steimel alleges that the four
Defendants violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to pay
overtime wages when he and others worked more than 40 hours in a
week.  He also alleges a class action for breach of contract for
failing to include all time worked as compensable time.

A copy of the Opinion and Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=oxnuDH1A


CREDENCE RESOURCE: Pinkney Seeks Certification of Class in Wisc.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Zachariah Pinkney moves the court to certify the class described
in the complaint of the lawsuit captioned ZACHARIAH PINKNEY,
Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v.
CREDENCE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, LLC, Case No. 2:16-cv-00658-WED
(E.D. Wisc.).  The Plaintiff also asks the Court to stay the
motion for class certification and to grant the Plaintiff (and the
Defendant) relief from the Local Rules setting automatic briefing
schedules and requiring briefs and supporting material to be filed
with the Motion.

To avoid the risk of a defendant mooting a putative class
representative's individual stake in the litigation, the Seventh
Circuit in Damasco instructed plaintiffs to file a certification
motion with the complaint, along with a motion to stay briefing on
the certification motion until discovery could commence.  Damasco
v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled,
Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015).

As this motion to certify a class is a placeholder motion as
described in Damasco, the parties and the Court should not be
burdened with unnecessary paperwork and the resulting expense when
a one paragraph, single page motion to certify and stay should
suffice until an amended motion is filed, the Plaintiff asserts.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=uVzBUvbu

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Shpetim Ademi, Esq.
          John D. Blythin, Esq.
          Mark A. Eldridge, Esq.
          ADEMI & O'REILLY, LLP
          3620 East Layton Avenue
          Cudahy, WI 53110
          Telephone: (414) 482-8000
          Facsimile: (414) 482-8001
          E-mail: sademi@ademilaw.com
                  jblythin@ademilaw.com
                  meldridge@ademilaw.com


CROATIA: Class Certification Sought in "Lalich" Holocaust Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit captioned Lizabeth Lalich, Mladen
Djuricich, Robert Predrag Gakovich, Veljko Miljus, Bogdan Kljaic,
David Levy, Daniel Pyevich, individually, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Republic of Croatia, Case No. 1:16-
cv-05712 (N.D. Ill.), file with the Court a placeholder motion for
certification of this class:

     All survivors, heirs, and next of kin, of persons of Jewish,
     Serbian, or Roma descent who were the victims of the
     Croatian Holocaust, and who (a) reside in the United States,
     or (b) are U.S. citizens residing abroad.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to designate them as the Class
representatives, and their counsel as Class counsel.  They further
ask the Court to award the Plaintiff Class the sum of $3.5 billion
minus a contingency fee of 20% for the Class's attorneys for
conceiving, initiating, pleading, and arguing this case on behalf
of the Class.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=rMrdFoog

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Anthony D'amato, Esq.
          5807 Lake Shore Drive
          Holland, MI 49424
          Telephone: (616)-399-6344
          E-mail: a-damato@northwestern.edu

               - and -

          Aaron Ross Walner, Esq.
          THE WALNER LAW FIRM
          555 Skokie BLVD. suite 250
          Northbrook, IL 60062
          Telephone: (312) 201-1616
          E-mail: awalner@walnerlawfirm.com


CURREY & COMPANY: Recalls Crystal Chandeliers Due to Fall Risk
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Currey & Company of Atlanta, Ga., announced a voluntary recall of
about 1,000 Crystal chandeliers (in addition, 26 sold in Canada).
Consumers should stop using this product unless otherwise
instructed.  It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a
recalled consumer product.

The loop at the top of the chandelier can break causing the
chandelier to fall, posing an impact injury hazard.

This recall involves an eight-light crystal chandelier. The frame
is silver with crystal ornaments and eight candle-shaped lights.
The loop at the top of the chandelier is made of zinc or steel.
The model number 093682 can be found on the inside of the canopy
and on the outside of the original carton.

The firm has received two reports of the loop breaking, including
one report of the chandelier falling. No injuries have been
reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/7QqeZW

The recalled products were manufactured in China and sold at Ethan
Allen Design Centers nationwide from October 2007 through January
2016 for about $2,500.

Consumers should prevent people from walking underneath the
chandeliers. Ethan Allen will contact consumers directly and
arrange for an Ethan Allen service technician to inspect the
chandeliers. If the loop is made of zinc, the loop will be
replaced by a certified electrician free of charge. If steel, no
repair is necessary.


DENTAL RESOURCE: Certification of Class Sought in "Neuer" Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit titled ERIC NEUER, doing business as
Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A., on behalf of themselves and all
those similarly situated v. DENTAL RESOURCE SYSTEMS, INC., et al.,
Case No. 2:14-cv-02319-CM-GEB (D. Kan.), moves the Court for an
order determining that the Plaintiff's Telephone Consumer
Protection Act claim against DRS will be maintained as a class
action with the proposed Plaintiff class defined as:

     All persons and entities with a fax number appearing in the
     List of Class Members to which Defendant sent one or more
     facsimile transmissions of representative images:

        Neuer (DRS) 001-002;
        Neuer (DRS) 003;
        Neuer (DRS) 004;
        Neuer (DRS) 005;
        Neuer (DRS) 006;
        Neuer (DRS) 007;
        Neuer (DRS) 008;
        Neuer (DRS) 009-010;
        Neuer (DRS) 011;
        Neuer (DRS) 012;
        Neuer (DRS) 013;
        Neuer (DRS) 014;
        Neuer (DRS) 015;
        Neuer (DRS) 016;
        Neuer (DRS) 018;
        Neuer (DRS) 019;
        Neuer (DRS) 020;
        Neuer (DRS) 022;
        Neuer (DRS) 023;
        Neuer (DRS) 024;
        Neuer (DRS) 025;
        Neuer (DRS) 026-027;
        Neuer (DRS) 028;
        Neuer (DRS) 029;
        Neuer (DRS) 372;
        Neuer (DRS) 373;
        Neuer (DRS) 375;
        Neuer (DRS) 376;
        Neuer (DRS) 489;
        Neuer (DRS) 490; or
        Neuer (DRS) 491

     between July 3, 2010 and June 3, 2016. Excluded from the
     class are Defendant and its shareholders, officers,
     directors, and employees, Defendant's counsel, any persons
     who previously have settled with Defendant, the Court and
     Court personnel, and counsel for the Plaintiff.

Mr. Neuer, doing business as Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A.,
also asks the Court to appoint him as class representative, and to
appoint Noah K. Wood, Esq., and Ari N. Rodopoulos, Esq., of the
Wood Law Firm, LLC as lead class counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=DPvYCZMB

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Noah K. Wood, Esq.
          Ari N. Rodopoulos, Esq.
          WOOD LAW FIRM, LLC
          1100 Main Street, Suite 1800
          Kansas City, MO 64105-5171
          Telephone: (816) 256-3582
          Facsimile: (816) 337-4243
          E-mail: noah@woodlaw.com
                  ari@woodlaw.com


DIODES INCORPORATED: Pension Trust Fund Suit Concluded
------------------------------------------------------
Diodes Incorporated said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the lawsuit by Local
731 I.B. of T. Excavators and Pavers Pension Trust Fund is
concluded.

On September 15, 2014, the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas issued an order regarding the putative
securities class action entitled Local 731 I.B. of T. Excavators
and Pavers Pension Trust Fund v. Diodes, Inc., Civil Action No.
6:13- cv-00247 (E.D. Tex. filed Mar. 15, 2013) (the "Class
Action"), granting defendants' motion to dismiss the Class Action
with prejudice. On October 13, 2014, plaintiffs filed a notice of
appeal to the order dismissing the Class Action to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On January 13,
2016, the Court of Appeals issued an order and opinion affirming
the dismissal of the Class Action with prejudice.  Plaintiffs-
appellants did not file a petition for a writ of certiorari to the
United States Supreme Court by the deadline of April 12, 2016, and
therefore the case is concluded.

Diodes Incorporated, together with its subsidiaries (Nasdaq:
DIOD), is a global manufacturer and supplier of high-quality,
application-specific standard products within the broad discrete,
logic, analog and mixed-signal semiconductor markets.


DOMETIC CORP: To Seek Dismissal of "Papasan" Class Suit
-------------------------------------------------------
In the case, CATHERINE PAPASAN, NELSON GOEHLE, ANDREW YOUNG, JIMMY
BYERS, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSTON, and all persons similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, v. DOMETIC CORPORATION and DOMETIC LLC, Defendants,
Case No. 3:16-cv-02117-HSG (N.D. Cal.), District Judge Haywood S.
Gilliam, Jr. approved a stipulation among Plaintiffs Catherine
Papasan, Nelson Goehle, Andrew Young, Jimmy Byers, and Christopher
Johnston and defendants Dometic Corporation and Dometic LLC
permitting the defendants to file a motion to dismiss the class
action complaint that exceeds Local Rule 7-2(b)'s 25-page
limitation by up to 10 pages.

On April 21, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their 82-page Class Action
Complaint, which contains 367 separately numbered paragraphs.

Defendants intend to file on June 17, 2016, a joint motion to
dismiss each of Plaintiffs' 21 claims on the ground that each of
these claims -- arising under Federal law and four separate
states' laws -- fail to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted.

A copy of the June 3, 2016 Stipulation is available at
http://bit.ly/25NxRkafrom Leagle.com.

Plaintiffs Catherine Papasan et al. represented by Jeff D Friedman
-- jefff@hbsslaw.com -- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Terrence
Allen Beard, Law Offices of Terrence A. Beard, Ashley A Bede --
ashleyb@hbsslaw.com -- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Steve W.
Berman -- steve@hbsslaw.com -- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP &
Thomas Eric Loeser -- toml@hbsslaw.com -- Hagens Berman Sobol
Shapiro LLP.

Dometic Corporation, Defendant, represented by Peter Allen Wald --
peter.wald@lw.com -- Latham & Watkins, Marcy Christina Priedeman,
Latham Watkins LLP & Robert Christian Collins, III, Latham and
Watkins LLP, pro hac vice.

Dometic LLC, Defendant, represented by Peter Allen Wald, Latham &
Watkins, Marcy Christina Priedeman -- marcy.priedeman@lw.com --
Latham Watkins LLP & Robert Christian Collins, III --
robert.collins@lw.com -- Latham and Watkins LLP, pro hac vice.


EASTMAN KODAK: Awaits Final Approval of ERISA Case Settlement
-------------------------------------------------------------
Eastman Kodak Company said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that subsequent to the
Company's Bankruptcy Filing, between January 27, 2012 and March
22, 2012, several putative class action suits were filed in
federal court in the Western District of New York against the
committees of the Company's Stock Ownership Plan ('SOP') and
Savings and Investment Plan ("SIP"), and certain former and
current executives of the Company. The suits were consolidated
into a single action brought under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act ("ERISA"), styled as In re Eastman Kodak ERISA
Litigation. The allegations concern the decline in the Company's
stock price and its alleged impact on SOP and SIP. Plaintiffs were
seeking the recovery of any losses to the applicable plans, a
constructive trust, the appointment of an independent fiduciary,
equitable relief, as applicable, and attorneys' fees and costs.
Defendants and plaintiffs, individually and as class
representatives, entered into a settlement agreement which was
preliminarily approved by the court on April 27, 2016, and is
conditioned on final court approval and entry of a final order.


ECOLAB INC: Still Defending 5 Wage Hour Suits
---------------------------------------------
Ecolab Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2016, that the company is a defendant in five
pending wage hour lawsuits claiming violations of the Fair Labor
Standards Act ("FLSA") or a similar state law. Of these five
suits, three have been certified for class action status.

Ross (formerly Icard) v. Ecolab, U.S. District Court -- Northern
District of California, case no. C 13-05097 PJH, an action under
California state law, has been certified for class treatment of
California Institutional employees. The Court in Ross recently
granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, finding
that Institutional Route Sales Managers are not exempt from
overtime pay under California wage and hour laws. The company
appealed this judgment. The court has not determined damages;
however the company has established an accrual, which is not
material to its results of operations or financial position. This
matter has been tentatively settled, subject to court approval.

In Cancilla v. Ecolab, U.S. District Court - Northern District of
California, case no. CV 12-03001, the Court conditionally
certified a nationwide class of Pest Elimination Service
Specialists for alleged FLSA violations. The suit also seeks a
purported California sub-class for alleged California wage hour
law violations and certifications of classes for state law
violations in Washington, Colorado, Maryland, Illinois, Missouri,
Wisconsin and North Carolina. The Cancilla lawsuit has been
settled. The settlement amount, which was not material to the
company's operations or financial position, was paid in the first
quarter of 2016.

A third pending suit, Charlot v. Ecolab Inc., U.S. District Court-
Eastern District of New York, case no. CV 12-04543, seeks
nationwide class certification of Institutional employees for
alleged FLSA violations as well as purported state sub-classes in
New York, New Jersey, Washington and Pennsylvania alleging
violations of state wage hour laws. The Court in Charlot recently
granted the company's motion for summary judgment against
plaintiffs on the federal FLSA claims. Plaintiffs' claims under
state law remain pending and the judgment in favor of Ecolab may
be subject to appeal by Plaintiffs.

A fourth pending suit, Schneider v. Ecolab, United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case no. 14 C 01044,
seeks certification of a class of Institutional employees for
alleged violations of Illinois wage and hour laws.

In a fifth pending suit, Martino v. Ecolab, United States District
Court for the Northern District of California, case no. 5:14-cv-
04358-PSG, an action under California state law, the Court has
certified a class of California Institutional Territory Managers
alleging violation of state wage and hour laws.


ECHO THERAPEUTICS: Misled Stockholders Over Fee-Shifting Bylaw
--------------------------------------------------------------
SIMPSON CHRISTIAN, on behalf of himself and all other similarly
situated stockholders of Echo Therapeutics, Inc., the Plaintiff,
v. Michael M. Goldberg, Shepard Goldberg, Elazer R. Edelman, Scott
W. Hollander, and Echo Therapeutics, Inc., the Defendants, Case
No. 12400-CB (Del. Chancery Ct., June 1, 2016), seeks damages for
the Defendants' breach of their fiduciary duties.

According to the complaint, the Defendants are improperly
misleading and coercing stockholders into believing that the Fee-
Shifting Bylaw is valid and enforceable under Delaware law. Thus,
the Defendants are currently causing harm to Echo stockholders.

Echo Therapeutics is developing a non-invasive, wireless,
continuous glucose monitoring system.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Seth D. Rigrodsky, Esq.
          Brian D. Long, Esq.
          Gina M. Serra, Esq.
          Jeremy J. Riley, Esq.
          RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A.
          2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120
          Wilmington, DE 19803
          Telephone: (302) 295 5310


EQT PRODUCTION: Renewed Class Certification Bid Due on Sept. 30
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. John Preston Bailey entered an order in the lawsuit
titled THE KAY COMPANY, LLC; H. DOTSON CATHER, Trustee of Diana
Goff Cather Trusts; and JAMES E. HAMRIC III, and all other persons
and entities similarly situated v. EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, a
Pennsylvania Corporation; and EQT CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania
Corporation, Case No. 1:13-cv-00151-JPB-JES (N.D.W.V.) directing
the:

   -- Plaintiffs to file a renewed motion for class certification
      by September 30, 2016;

   -- Defendants must file their response by October 30, 2016;
      and

   -- Plaintiffs' reply must be filed by November 15, 2016;

In light of the impending renewed Motion, the pending motion for
class certification is denied without prejudice.  Additionally,
the motion to exclude testimony of Plaintiffs' proffered expert
witnesses is denied without prejudice.  The parties indicated
discovery will be finalized by August 15, 2016, and the Plaintiffs
wish to file a renewed motion for class certification.

The Court noted this case is nearly three years old.  Accordingly,
Judge Bailey inquired as to the progress that has taken place to
date and when the parties expect to bring this matter to fruition.

Judge Bailey also inquired as to the suggestion of death and who
would replace H. Dotson Cather as Trustee of Diana Goff Cather
Trusts.  The Plaintiffs' counsel indicated that decision had not
been made, but will report to the Court when the substitution is
made.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=RlkYKyGq


EZPAWN FLORIDA: Court Refuses to Certify Class; Junks "Ward" Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Anne C. Conway denied the Plaintiff's amended motion for
class certification in the lawsuit captioned KEVIN PETER WARD,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v.
EZPAWN FLORIDA, INC. d/b/a VALUE PAWN AND JEWELRY, and EZCORP,
INC., Case No. 6:15-cv-00474-ACC-DAB (M.D. Fla.).

Judge Conway dismissed the Case without prejudice for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction.  Judge Conway directed the Clerk to
close the Case.

The Plaintiff wishes to certify a class action for consumers that
were subjected to the Defendants' allegedly unfair and deceptive
business practices.  The Plaintiff is a Florida resident that has
done business with pawnshops for 12 years.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=WrUMfEzE


FEDERAL NATIONAL: D.C. Circuit Heard Oral Argument on Appeal
------------------------------------------------------------
Federal National Mortgage Association said in its Form 10-Q Report
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016,
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the D.C.
Circuit heard oral argument on April 15, 2016, on the appeals in
the Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements Litigation.

The Company said, "A number of putative class action lawsuits were
filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
against us, FHFA as our conservator, Treasury and Freddie Mac from
July through September 2013 by shareholders of Fannie Mae and/or
Freddie Mac challenging the August 2012 amendment to each
company's senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury.
These lawsuits were consolidated and, on December 3, 2013,
plaintiffs (preferred and common shareholders of Fannie Mae and/or
Freddie Mac) filed a consolidated class action complaint in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against us, FHFA
as our conservator, Treasury and Freddie Mac ("In re Fannie
Mae/Freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class
Action Litigations"). The preferred shareholder plaintiffs allege
that the net worth sweep dividend provisions of the senior
preferred stock that were implemented pursuant to the August 2012
amendments to the senior preferred stock purchase agreements
nullified certain of the shareholders' rights, particularly the
right to receive dividends. The common shareholder plaintiffs
allege that the August 2012 amendments constituted a taking of
their property by requiring that all future profits of Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac be paid to Treasury. Plaintiffs allege claims for
breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good
faith and fair dealing against us, FHFA and Freddie Mac, a takings
claim against FHFA and Treasury, and a breach of fiduciary duty
claim derivatively on our and Freddie Mac's behalf against FHFA
and Treasury. Plaintiffs seek to represent several classes of
preferred and/or common shareholders of Fannie Mae and/or Freddie
Mac who held stock as of the public announcement of the August
2012 amendments. Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, equitable
and injunctive relief, and costs and expenses, including
attorneys' fees."

"A non-class action suit, Arrowood Indemnity Company v. Fannie
Mae, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia on September 20, 2013 by preferred shareholders against
us, FHFA as our conservator, the Director of FHFA (in his official
capacity), Treasury, the Secretary of the Treasury (in his
official capacity) and Freddie Mac. Plaintiffs bring claims for
breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good
faith and fair dealing against us, FHFA and Freddie Mac, and
claims for violation of the Administrative Procedure Act against
the FHFA and Treasury defendants, alleging that the net worth
sweep dividend provisions nullified certain rights of the
preferred shareholders, particularly the right to receive
dividends. Plaintiffs seek damages, equitable and injunctive
relief, and costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees.

"On September 30, 2014, the court dismissed both lawsuits and
plaintiffs in both suits filed timely notices of appeal. On
October 27, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
consolidated these appeals with appeals in two other cases
involving the same subject matter, but to which we are not a
party. The D.C. Circuit heard oral argument on these appeals on
April 15, 2016."


FERRING PHARMACEUTICALS: Faces "Rosas" Suit in D.N.J.
-----------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The
case is captioned Brandy Rosas and Orly Lazarian, individually and
for all others similarly situated, the Plaintiffs, v. Ferring
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the Defendant, Case No. 2:16-cv-03137-KM-
JBC (D.N.J., June 1, 2016). The assigned Judge is Hon. Kevin
McNulty.

Ferring is a biopharmaceutical company which develops innovative
treatments. The Compamy is active in the areas of reproductive
health, urology, gastroenterology, endocrinology and orthopaedics.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Alan T. Friedman
          BAGOLIE-FRIEDMAN, LLC
          648 Newark Avenue
          Jersey City, NJ 07306
          Telephone: (201) 656 8500
          Facsimile: (201) 656 4703
          E-mail: alan@bagoliefriedman.com


FITBIT INC: "Rivera" SEC Fraud Suit Removed to N.D. Cal.
--------------------------------------------------------
Raul Rivera, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, plaintiff, v. Fitbit, Inc., James Park, Eric N.
Friedman, William Zerella, Jonathan D. Callaghan, Steven Murray,
Christopher Paisley, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, Barclays Capital Inc., Suntrust Robinson Humphrey,
Inc., Piper Jaffray & Co., Raymond James & Associates, Inc.,
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, William Blair & Company,
L.L.C., and Does 1-25, Inclusive, Defendants, Case No. CIV538403
(Cal. Super., April 28, 2016), was removed to the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California on May 27, 2016.

Plaintiff is seeking the recovery of damages resulting from the
purchase of common stock of Fitbit during its initial public
offering.

Raul Rivera is a pro se plaintiff.

Defendants are represented by:

     Anna Erickson White, Esq.
     MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
     425 Market Street
     San Francisco, CA 94105
     Tel: (415) 268-6000
     Fax: (415) 268-7522
     Email: awhite@mofo.com


GARDEN FRESH: FLSA Class Certification Sought in "Johnson" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit titled ARIELL JOHNSON, KELVIN SMITH,
DONTRELL JACKSON, JAMES JACKSON, And PATRICK JOHNSON, Individually
and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated v. GARDEN FRESH
RESTAURANT CORP. d/b/a SOUPLANTATION AND SWEET TOMATOES, Case No.
4:16-cv-00845 (S.D. Tex.), file with the Court their motion for
class certification and expedited discovery.

On March 30, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed a putative action lawsuit
under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 alleging that Defendant
Souplantation failed to pay them overtime wages as required by
law.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=BttnR3r6

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Taft L. Foley, Esq.
          THE FOLEY LAW FIRM
          3003 South Loop West, Suite 108
          Houston, TX 77054
          Telephone: (832) 778-8182
          Facsimile: (832) 778-8353
          E-mail: Taft.foley@thefoleylawfirm.com


GARMIN LTD: Wins Preliminary Approval of "Katz" Suit Settlement
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Robert J. Shelby entered an order in the lawsuit
captioned ANDREA KATZ on behalf of herself and all persons
similarly situated, and JOEL KATZ on behalf of himself and all
persons similarly situated v. GARMIN, LTD, and GARMIN
INTERNATIONAL, INC., Case No. 2:14-cv-00165-RJS-PMW (D. Utah),
preliminarily approving a settlement, certifying class for
settlement purposes, appointing lead counsel for the class,
directing the issuance of class notice, and scheduling a fairness
hearing and related events.

The Court conditionally certifies a Class and Subclasses, for
settlement purposes only, defined as:

     Class: All persons who purchased and/or owned the Garmin
     Forerunner 610 watch (the "Watch") between April 2011 and
     July 2014 in the United States.

     Subclass 1: Class members who purchased a replacement
     watchband to address the alleged design defect regardless of
     where they purchased the replacement watchband.

     Subclass 2: Class members who paid to repair the watchband
     or Watch regardless of where they had the watchband or Watch
     repaired due to the watchband or Watch being damaged as a
     result of the alleged design defect.

Excluded from the Settlement Class are: (i) individuals, who are
or were during the class period partners, associates, officers,
directors, shareholders, or employees of Defendant; (ii) all
judges or magistrates of the United States or any state and their
spouses; (iii) all individuals, who timely and properly request to
be excluded from the class, i.e. opt out; (iv) all persons, who
have previously released Defendant from claims covered by this
Settlement; and (v) all persons, who have already received payment
from the Defendant or who have otherwise been compensated by the
Defendant by virtue of free repair or free replacement of the
Watch or watchband for alleged violations with respect to an
allegedly defective Watch or watchband.

There are approximately 136,728 members of the Class, and an
unknown number of members of Subclass 1 and Subclass 2, according
to the Defendant's records.  The Court acknowledges that the
Defendant does not have records of every customer, who purchased
or owned the Garmin Forerunner 610 watch.

The Court conditionally appoints Noel J. Nudelman, Esq., of
Heideman Nudelman Kalik, P.C., as lead class counsel for the Class
and Subclasses.

A hearing on the fairness and reasonableness of the Agreement and
whether final approval will be given to it and the requests for
fees and expenses by Class Counsel will be held before the Court
on November 3, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=4S2xpWXp


GENERAL MILLS: Recalls Flour Products Due to E. Coli
----------------------------------------------------
General Mills is collaborating with health officials to
investigate an ongoing, multistate outbreak of E. coli O121 that
may be potentially linked to Gold Medal flour, Wondra flour, and
Signature Kitchens flour (sold in Safeway, Albertsons, Jewel,
Shaws, Vons, United, Randalls, and Acme). Out of an abundance of
caution, a voluntary recall is being made. To date, E. coli O121
has not been found in any General Mills flour products or in the
flour manufacturing facility and the company has not been
contacted directly by any consumer reporting confirmed illnesses
related to these products.

State and federal authorities have been researching 38 occurrences
of illnesses across 20 states related to a specific type of E.
coli (E. coli O121), between December 21, 2015, and May 3, 2016.
While attempting to track the cause of the illness, CDC found that
approximately half of the individuals reported making something
homemade with flour at some point prior to becoming ill. Some
reported using a General Mills brand of flour.

Based on the information that has been shared with General Mills,
some of the ill consumers may have also consumed raw dough or
batter. Consumers are reminded to not consume any raw products
made with flour. Flour is an ingredient that comes from milling
wheat, something grown outdoors that carries with it risks of
bacteria which are rendered harmless by baking, frying or boiling.
Consumers are reminded to wash their hands, work surfaces, and
utensils thoroughly after contact with raw dough products or
flour, and to never eat raw dough or batter.

"As a leading provider of flour for 150 years, we felt it was
important to not only recall the product and replace it for
consumers if there was any doubt, but also to take this
opportunity to remind our consumers how to safely handle flour,"
said Liz Nordlie, President of General Mills Baking division.

Although most strains of E. coli are harmless, others can make you
sick.E. coli O121 is a potentially deadly bacterium that can cause
bloody diarrhea and dehydration. Seniors, the very young, and
persons with compromised immune systems are the most susceptible
to foodborne illness.

Any consumers concerned about an illness should contact a
physician. Anyone diagnosed by a physician as having an illness
related to E. coli O121 is also urged to contact state and local
public health authorities.

The recall affects the following retail flour products that could
be currently in stores or in consumers' pantries. It includes 6
SKUs (stock keeping units or UPC codes) of Gold Medal Flour, 2
SKU's of Signature Kitchens Flour and 1 SKU of Gold Medal Wondra
flour.

If you have any of the products listed below, they should be
thrown away. Consumers with additional questions or requesting a
replacement should contact the company at 800-230-8103. Additional
recall information can also be found at
www.generalmills.com/flour.

The specific products in the recall include:

  --- 13.5 ounce Gold Medal Wondra Flour
      Package UPC  000-16000-18980
      Recalled Better if Used by Dates 25FEB2017 thru 30MAR2017
  --- 2 lb. Gold Medal All Purpose Flour
      Package UPC  000-16000-10710
      Recalled Better if Used by Dates 25MAY2017KC thru
      03JUN2017KC
  --- 2lb Gold Medal Self-Rising Flour
      Package UPC  000-16000-11710
      Recalled Better if Used by Dates 23AUG2016KC
  --- 10lb Gold Medal All Purpose Flour
      Package UPC  000-16000-10410
      Recalled Better if Used by Dates 02JUN2017KC, 03JUN2017KC
  --- 5lb Gold Medal All Purpose Flour
      Package UPC  000-16000-10610
      Recalled Better if Used by Dates 25MAY2017KC, 27MAY2017KC
      thru 31MAY2017KC, 01JUN2017KC, 03JUN2017KC thru
      05JUN2017KC, 11JUN2017KC thru 14JUN2017KC
  --- 5lb Gold Medal Unbleached Flour
      Package UPC  000-16000-19610
      Recalled Better if Used by Dates 25MAY2017KC, 27MAY2017KC,
      03JUN2017KC, 04JUN2017KC
  --- 10lb Gold Medal All Purpose Flour- Banded Pack
      Package UPC  000-16000-10410
      Recalled Better if Used by Dates 03JUN2017KC, 04JUN2017KC,
      05JUN2017KC
  --- 5lb Signature Kitchens All Purpose Flour Enriched Bleached
      Package UPC  000-21130-53001
      Recalled Better if Used by Dates BB MAY 28 2017
  --- 5lb Signature Kitchens Unbleached Flour All Purpose
      Enriched
      Package UPC  000-21130-53022
      Recalled Better if Used by Dates BB MAY 27 2017

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/hyZzUC


GLOBAL EFFECTS: "Crosson" Suit seeks Minimum Wages, Overtime
------------------------------------------------------------
Jennifer Crosson, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v.
Global Effects Incorporated d/b/a Cornerstone Baptist Church also
d/b/a Pebbles Preschool and Kindergarten, Bobby Herrell and Susan
Herrell Defendants, Case No. 3:16-cv-01449-D (N.D. Tex., May 27,
2016), seeks overtime wages, double damages and reasonable
attorney fees pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Global Effects Incorporated operates Cornerstone Baptist Church
and Pebbles Preschool and Kindergarten with Bobby Herrell and
Susan Herrell are owners. Crosson worked for Defendants as a
preschool teacher and child care provider. Plaintiff has not been
paid minimum wages and/or overtime for work performed in excess of
40 hours weekly.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     J.H. Zidell, Esq.
     Robert L. Manteuffel, Esq.
     Joshua A. Petersen, Esq.
     J.H. ZIDELL, P.C.
     6310 LBJ Freeway, Ste. 112
     Dallas, TX 75240
     Tel: (972) 233-2264
     Fax: (972) 386-7610
     Email: zabogado@aol.com
            rlmanteuffel@sbcglobal.net
            josh.a.petersen@gmail.com


GOLDEN 1: "Cyr" Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages Under Labor Code
--------------------------------------------------------
Geraldine St. Cyr, individually, and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. The Golden 1 Credit Union,
and Does 1-100, inclusive, the Defendants, Case No. RG16817839
(Cal. Super. Ct., June 1, 2016), seeks to recover unpaid wages,
including unpaid overtime compensation and interest thereon,
liquidated damages and other penalties, injunctive and other
equitable relief, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, under
California Code of Regulations, California Business and
Professions Code and the California Labor Code.

According to the complaint, the Defendants continues to enjoy an
advantage over its competition and a resultant disadvantage to its
workers by electing not to sufficiently offer meal and rest
periods to its California non-exempt branch employees, by not
providing duty-free and uninterrupted meal and rest periods to its
California non-exempt branch employees, by not providing all
regular and/or overtime pay when due and/or when certain Class
Members' employment with Golden 1 terminated, and by willfully
failing to provide Plaintiff and Class Members with accurate
semimonthly itemized wage statements.

Golden 1 is California's financial cooperative with branches in 34
of state's counties.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Scott Edward Cole, Esq.
          Matthew R. Bainer, Esq.
          SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
          1970 Broadway, Ninth Floor
          Oakland, CA 94612
          Telephone: (510) 891 9800
          Facsimile: (510) 891 7030
          Email: scole@scalaw.com
                 mbainer@scalaw.com


GOOGLE INC: Svenson Seeks Certification of Class and Subclass
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit styled ALICE SVENSON, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. GOOGLE, INC.,
and GOOGLE PAYMENT CORP., Case No. 5:13-cv-04080-BLF (N.D. Cal.),
move the Court for an order certifying these proposed class and
subclass of individuals:

     Class: All individuals in the United States who, between
     March 1, 2012 and April 30, 2014, (i) purchased an App on
     the Google Play Store that cost less than $300, (ii) using a
     Google Wallet account tied to a credit or debit card at the
     time of purchase, and who (iii) had not previously used
     Google Wallet or Google Checkout to purchase physical goods.


     EU Seller Subclass: All members of the Class who purchased
     an App from a seller located in a European Union member
     state at the time of the sale.

The Court will commence a hearing on August 24, 2016, at 9:00
a.m., to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=87btNxQF

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Rafey S. Balabanian, Esq.
          EDELSON PC
          329 Bryant Street, Suite 2C
          San Francisco, CA 94107
          Telephone: (415) 234-5342
          Facsimile: (415) 373-9495
          E-mail: rbalabanian@edelson.com

               - and -

          Jay Edelson, Esq.
          Benjamin H. Richman, Esq.
          J. Dominick Larry, Esq.
          EDELSON PC
          350 North LaSalle Street, 13th Floor
          Chicago, IL 60654
          Telephone: (312) 589-6370
          Facsimile: (312) 589-6378
          E-mail: jedelson@edelson.com
                  brichman@edelson.com
                  nlarry@edelson.com

               - and -

          Mark Bulgarelli, Esq.
          PROGRESSIVE LAW GROUP LLC
          140 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 315
          Chicago, IL 60603
          Telephone: (312) 787-2717
          Facsimile: (888) 574-9038
          E-mail: markb@progressivelaw.com

               - and -

          Frank Jablonski, Esq.
          PROGRESSIVE LAW GROUP LLC
          354 West Main Street
          Madison, WI 53703
          Telephone: (608) 258-8511
          Facsimile: (608) 442-949
          E-mail: frankj@progressivelaw.com

               - and -

          Kathryn Diemer, Esq.
          DIEMER, WHITMAN & CARDOSI, LLP
          75 East Santa Clara Street, Suite 290
          San Jose, CA 95113
          Telephone: (408) 971-6270
          E-mail: kdiemer@diemerwhitman.com


GREENES ENERGY: "Lee" Labor Suit Transferred to W.D. Pa.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Richard Emmet Lee, Individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated Plaintiff, v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC,
Defendant, Case No. 2:16-cv-00699-LPL (S.D. Tex., Feb. 29, 2016),
was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Western
District of Pennsylvania on May 27, 2016.

Plaintiff seeks to recover compensation, liquidated damages,
attorney fees and costs pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act
of 1938.

Greene's Energy Group is an diversified oilfield services company,
providing integrated testing, rentals and specialty services
offering packaged solutions to improve productivity onshore and
offshore. Lee worked for Greene as a hydraulic choke/flowback
operator. He claims to have been denied overtime pay.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Clif Alexander, Esq.
     Austin W. Anderson, Esq.
     Lauren E. Braddy, Esq.
     PHIPPS ANDERSON DEACON LLP
     819 N. Upper Broadway
     Corpus Christi, TX 78401
     Telephone: (361) 452-1279
     Facsimile: (361) 452-1284
     Email: calexander@phippsandersondeacon.com
            aanderson@phippsandersondeacon.com
            lbraddy@phippsandersondeacon.com

Defendant is represented by:

     Carolyn A Russell, Esq.
     Stephen Jose Quezada, Esq.
     OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
     500 Dallas St., Ste. 3000
     Houston, TX 77002
     Tel: (713) 655-5771
     Fax: (713) 655-0020
     Email: carolyn.russell@ogletreedeakins.com
            Stephen.Quezada@ogletreedeakins.com


HESKA CORP: Class Cert. Bid in "Fauley" Suit Under Advisement
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois made a docket entry on May 31, 2016, in the case entitled
Shaun Fauley v. Heska Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-02171
(N.D. Ill.), relating to a hearing held before the Honorable Jorge
L. Alonso.

The minute entry states that:

   -- Plaintiff's motion for class certification is taken under
      advisement;

   -- Plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to file exhibit to
      memorandum in support of motion for class certification
      under seal is granted; and

   -- motion hearing date of June 1, 2016, is stricken.

A copy of the Notification of Docket Entry is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=xEnTkRnn


HARVEY & MADDING: Sued in Cal Super. Ct. Over False Advertisement
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paula Weiss individually; and, on behalf of all others similarly
situated, the Plaintiff, v. Harvey & Madding, Inc., an active
California corporation, dba Dublin Honda; Harvey & Madding, Inc.,
an active California corporation, Ken Harvey, an individual, Jim
Bailey, an individual, Adam Ruiz, an individual; Tito Perez an
individual; Wells Fargo Dealer Services; and Does 1-500,
inclusive, the Defendants, Case No. RG16817793 (Cal Super. Ct.,
June 1, 2016), seeks to declaratory and injunctive relief, and
amount in controversy, including Plaintiff's statutory claim for
an award of reasonable attorney's fees, exceeding $25,000.00.

According to the complaint, the Plaintiff relied on the
representations and has suffered injury in fact and has lost money
or property as a result of Defendants' acts of false advertising.
The Defendants, by committing the acts alleged above, have
knowingly disseminated false, untrue and/or misleading statements
in an advertising or other device with the intent to sell and/or
induce members of the public to purchase automobiles, and have
violated Business and Professions Code

Harvey & Madding doing business as Dublin Honda, operates as a
dealer of new and used Honda cars in Dublin.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Louis A. Liberty, Esq.
          LOUIS LIBERTY & ASSOCIATES, PLC
          553 Pilgrim Drive, Suite A
          Foster City, CA 94404
          Telephone: (650) 341 0300
          Facsimile: (650) 403 1783
          E-mail: lou@carlawyer.com


HED CYCLING: Recalls Hed Black Rims Due to Crash Hazard
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Hed Cycling of, Roseville, Minn., announced a voluntary recall of
about 380 units Hed Black Rims. Consumers should stop using this
product unless otherwise instructed.  It is illegal to resell or
attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.

The rims can cause the brake pads to wear out unexpectedly, posing
a crash hazard to the rider.

This recall involves Ardennes Black and Jet Black rims
manufactured between January 1, 2016 and March 15, 2016.  Serial
numbers beginning with 0116, 0216 or 0316 are printed near the
valve hole on the rim.

The firm has received six reports of accelerated brake pad wear.
No injuries have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/TnqnuS

The recalled products were manufactured in USA and sold at
Authorized Hed dealers nationwide and online from January 2016 to
March 2016 for between $700 for an individual wheel and $2,400 for
a set of wheels.

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled rims and
contact HED Cycling for replacement instructions.


HOLLANDER SLEEP: Recalls Mattress Pads Due to Fire Hazard
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Hollander Sleep Products LLC, of Boca Raton, Fla., announced a
voluntary recall of about 4,700 Wamsutta Mattress Pads. Consumers
should stop using this product unless otherwise instructed.  It is
illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer
product.

The mattress pads fail to meet the mandatory federal flammability
standard for mattresses and mattress pads, posing a fire hazard.

This recall involves all sizes of Wamsutta Dream Zone cotton 800
thread count mattress pads, manufactured from August 2015 through
January 2016. Hollander Sleep Products, style number 266BB and the
manufacture date are printed on a label on a side of the mattress
pad.

No consumer incidents have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/RLPXGy

The recalled products were manufactured in U.S. and sold at Bed,
Bath & Beyond stores nationwide and online at
www.bedbathandbeyond.com from August 2015 through January 2016 for
between $110 and $170.

Consumers should immediately stop using the mattress pads and
contact Hollander Sleep Products for postage paid shipping label
and instructions on returning the product for a full refund.


HOME HEALTH: Conditional Certification Granted in "Jasper" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., granted the Plaintiffs' motion for
conditional class certification, expedited discovery, and court-
supervised notice to potential opt-in plaintiffs in the lawsuit
captioned JENNY JASPER, et al. v. HOME HEALTH CONNECTION, INC.,
Case No. 2:16-cv-00125-EAS-EPD (S.D. Ohio).

Plaintiff Jenny Jasper worked for Defendant Home Health
Connection, Inc., as a home manager, caregiver, or home health
aide from December 2013 to February 2016.  She filed a Complaint
against the Defendant under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the
Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act.

The Court conditionally certifies an FLSA class consisting of any
home manager, caregiver, licensed practical nurse, home health
aide, physical therapist, occupational therapist, aide, registered
nurse or other employee who provided companionship services,
domestic services, home care, and other in-home services, employed
by Home Health Connection, Inc. between October 13, 2015 and the
present, and who worked more than forty hours in a week during
that period without receiving time-and-a-half pay.

Within seven days of the issuance of the Opinion and Order, the
Court directed the Defendant to, if it has not already done so,
provide the Class Plaintiffs with names, residential and business
addresses, and e-mail addresses for all employees, both current
and former, employed by Defendant since October 13, 2015, who
provided companionship services.

Judge Sargus ordered the Class Plaintiffs to make the changes to
the Opt-In Notice mandated by the Opinion and Order, and mail the
updated Opt-In Notice and consent form to prospective class
members within 10 days of receiving from the Defendant the
information outlined above.

A copy of the Opinion and Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=vzadekUW


HUNGARY: Star Seeks Class Certification of Suit Over Holocaust
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit titled Joe W. Star, Stephan Istvan
Bass, Edith Reich Alexander, Judith Varnai Aronson, Iren Schwarz
Gati, Ani Brieger, Gizella Frischman Barabas and Mary Keller
Wexler, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Republic of Hungary, Case No. 1:16-cv-05709 (N.D.
Ill.), file their placeholder motion for certification of this
class:

      All survivors, heirs, and next of kin, of persons of Jewish
      descent who were the victims of the Hungarian Holocaust,
      and who (a) reside in the United States, or (b) are U.S.
      citizens residing abroad.

The Case seeks compensation for victims, survivors, heirs, and
next of kin of Hungarian Jews, who were allegedly deprived of
their property and possessions as a result of the Holocaust
conducted by the Republic of Hungary during World War II.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to designate them as the Class
representatives, and their counsel as Class counsel.

                          *     *     *

The Clerk of the Court made a minute entry on June 1, 2016, in the
case stating that the Plaintiffs' Motion is entered and continued
generally.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=8sOvAB5d

A copy of the Notification of Docket Entry is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=9B0Ce8ys

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Anthony D'Amato, Esq.
          5807 Lake Shore Drive
          Holland, MI 49424
          Telephone: (616)-399-6344
          E-mail: a-damato@northwestern.edu

               - and -

          Aaron Ross Walner, Esq.
          THE WALNER LAW FIRM
          555 Skokie BLVD. suite 250
          Northbrook, IL 60062
          Telephone: (312) 201-1616
          E-mail: awalner@walnerlawfirm.com


INDOFF INC: Hearing on Bid to Certify Class Continued to July 7
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois made a docket entry on May 31, 2016, in the case styled
Old Town Pizza of Lombard, Inc. v. Indoff, Incorporated, et al.,
Case No. 1:16-cv-05254 (N.D. Ill.), relating to a hearing held
before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr.

The minute entry states that the Plaintiff's motion to certify
class is entered and continued on July 7, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.  The
notice of the June 2 motion date is stricken.

A copy of the Notification of Docket Entry is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=K5HJNDzW


INTERNATIONAL PAPER: Kleen Products Action in Discovery Stage
-------------------------------------------------------------
International Paper Company said in its Form 10-Q Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the Kleen Products
LLC action related to containerboard is in the discovery stage and
the Tennessee action is in a preliminary stage.

The Company said, "In September 2010, eight containerboard
producers, including International Paper and Temple-Inland, were
named as defendants in a purported class action complaint that
alleged a civil violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The
suit is captioned Kleen Products LLC v. International Paper Co.
(N.D. Ill.). The complaint alleges that the defendants, beginning
in February 2004 through November 2010, conspired to limit the
supply and thereby increase prices of containerboard products. The
class is all persons who purchased containerboard products
directly from any defendant for use or delivery in the United
States during the period February 2004 to November 2010. The
complaint seeks to recover unspecified treble damages and
attorneys' fees on behalf of the purported class. Four similar
complaints were filed and have been consolidated in the Northern
District of Illinois. In March 2015, the District Court certified
a class of direct purchasers of containerboard products; in June
2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
granted the defendants' petition to appeal and the class
certification issue is now pending in that court. In June 2015,
International Paper and Temple-Inland were named as defendants in
a lawsuit, later dismissed without prejudice in November 2015,
captioned Del Monte Fresh Products N.A., Inc. v. Packaging
Corporation of America (S.K. Fl.), in which the Plaintiff asserted
substantially similar allegations to those raised in the Kleen
Products LLC action. Moreover, in January 2011, International
Paper was named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in state court
in Cocke County, Tennessee alleging that International Paper
violated Tennessee law by conspiring to limit the supply and fix
the prices of containerboard from mid-2005 to the present.
Plaintiffs in the state court action seek certification of a class
of Tennessee indirect purchasers of containerboard products,
damages and costs, including attorneys' fees. No class
certification materials have been filed to date in the Tennessee
action. The Company disputes the allegations made and is
vigorously defending each action. However, because the Kleen
Products LLC action is in the discovery stage and the Tennessee
action is in a preliminary stage, we are unable to predict an
outcome or estimate a range of reasonably possible loss."


INTERNATIONAL PAPER: Still Defends Homebuilders' Lawsuit
--------------------------------------------------------
International Paper Company said in its Form 10-Q Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the Company
intends to dispute the allegations made and to vigorously defend
the lawsuit filed by several homebuilders related to gypsum.

The Company said, "Beginning in late December 2012, certain
purchasers of gypsum board filed a number of purported class
action complaints alleging civil violations of Section 1 of the
Sherman Act against Temple-Inland and a number of other gypsum
manufacturers. The complaints were similar and alleged that the
gypsum manufacturers conspired or otherwise reached agreements to:
(1) raise prices of gypsum board either from 2008 or 2011 through
the present; (2) avoid price erosion by ceasing the practice of
issuing job quotes; and (3) restrict supply through downtime and
limiting order fulfillment. On April 8, 2013, the Judicial Panel
on Multidistrict Litigation ordered transfer of all pending cases
to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania for coordinated and consolidated pretrial
proceedings, and the direct purchaser plaintiffs and indirect
purchaser plaintiffs filed their respective amended consolidated
complaints in June 2013. The amended consolidated complaints
alleged a conspiracy or agreement beginning on or before September
2011. The alleged classes were all persons who purchased gypsum
board directly or indirectly from any defendant. The complainants
sought to recover unspecified treble actual damages and attorneys'
fees on behalf of the purported classes. In February 2015, we
executed a definitive agreement to settle these cases for an
immaterial amount, and this settlement received final court
approval and was paid in the third quarter of 2015. In March 2015,
several homebuilders filed an antitrust action in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California
alleging that they purchased gypsum board and making similar
allegations to those contained in the above settled proceeding.
The Company intends to dispute the allegations made and to
vigorously defend that lawsuit and any lawsuit brought by any
purported class member that elected to opt out of the settlement."


INTERNATIONAL PAPER: Canada Case Settlement Subject to Negotiation
------------------------------------------------------------------
International Paper Company said in its Form 10-Q Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that in September 2013,
similar purported class actions were filed in courts in Quebec,
Canada and Ontario, Canada, with each suit alleging violations of
the Canadian Competition Act and seeking damages and injunctive
relief. "In May 2015, we reached an agreement in principle to
settle these Canadian cases, as well as a similar action filed in
British Columbia, Canada, for an immaterial amount. This
settlement in principle is subject to negotiation and execution of
a definitive settlement agreement, which would then be subject to
court approval," the Company said.


JAMES STEWART: Class Certification in "Pipkins" Suit Dismissed
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Dee D. Drell dismissed as premature the motion to certify
class in the lawsuit captioned Renee Pipkins, et al. v. James E.
Stewart, Sr., Case No. 5:15-cv-02722-DDD-MLH (W.D. La.).

Judge Drell said that the Motion may be re-urged after class
certification discovery is complete, assuming the Case is not
dismissed on another basis.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=VvB9O9M8


KASHI COMPANY: Recalls Granola Products Due to Listeria
-------------------------------------------------------
Kashi Company announced a voluntary recall of Kashi(R) Trail Mix
Chewy Granola Bars and Bear Naked(R) Soft Baked Granola, Cinnamon
+ Sunflower Butter in the continental United States because they
contain ingredients made from sunflower seeds distributed by our
supplier, SunOpta, that have the potential to be contaminated with
Listeria monocytogenes.

Listeria monocytogenes can cause serious and sometimes fatal
infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others
with weakened immune systems. Although healthy individuals may
suffer only short-term symptoms such as high fever, severe
headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea, Listeria
infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant
women.

The company has received no reports of illness to date but is
taking this action as part of its commitment to the health and
safety of the people who eat its foods.

HOW TO IDENTIFY THE RECALLED PRODUCT

The recall is limited to Kashi Trail Mix Chewy Granola Bars and
Bear Naked Soft Baked Granola, Cinnamon + Sunflower Butter packed
in two sizes. These products were distributed throughout the
continental United States:

  Description     UPC Code      Size     Better If Used
  (Retail)        --------      ----     Before Date/Best If
  -----------                            Used By Date
                                         --------------------

  Kashi(R) Trail  18627 03000   7.4 oz   JAN0417; JAN0517;
  Mix Chewy                     (6 ct)   JAN0617; JAN0717;
  Granola Bars                           JAN0817; JAN09 17
  Bear Naked(R)   84623 10163   11 oz    JAN 10 2017 and
  Soft Baked                             JAN 11 2017
  Granola,
  Cinnamon +
  Sunflower Butter

  Description     UPC Code      Size     Better If Used
  (Club)          --------      ----     Before Date/Best If
  -----------                            Used By Date
                                         --------------------
  Bear Naked(R)   84623 10173   26 oz    DEC 24 2016; DEC 25
  Soft Baked                             2016;
  Granola,                               JAN 11 2017; JAN 12
  Cinnamon +                             2017;
  Sunflower Butter                       JAN 13, 2017

Images of these products can be found at
www.consumeralert.kashi.com. No other Kashi or Bear Naked products
are impacted by this recall.

People who have purchased affected product should discard it and
contact Kashi for a full refund.  Additional information is
available on our website at www.consumeralert.kashi.com and by
calling our consumer hotline at 1-877-747-2467, Monday through
Friday, 6 a.m. - 3 p.m. PST.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/ql3Llh


KBK SERVICES: Court Certifies FLSA Class in "Ricard" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. James D. Peterson granted the Plaintiffs' motion for
class certification in the lawsuit entitled ANDREW RICARD, TIM
MACKAY, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
v. KBK SERVICES INC., Case No. 3:15-cv-00299-jdp (W.D. Wisc.).

The Plaintiffs accuse their former employer, KBK Services Inc., of
underpaying employees.  The Plaintiffs seek to represent a
collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and a class
action under Wisconsin wage and hour laws, Wisconsin Statutes
Section 109.03 and Wisconsin Administrative Code DWD Section
272.12.

Judge Peterson opined that certain claim is time barred and,
hence, revised the Class definition as follows:

     all KBK employees who, during the time period of May 19,
     2013 and thereafter, traveled at least 90 miles from their
     home to work on a KBK jobsite, and were not paid for all of
     their travel time between their home and the KBK jobsite or
     did not have all of their travel time counted as hours
     worked in determining their eligibility for overtime pay.

In the same Opinion and Order, Judge Peterson denied KBK's motion
to decertify the collective action.

A copy of the Opinion and Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=ApnouXpm


KEARNES PAINTING: Certification of Class Sought in "Miller" Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fredrick Miller moves the Court for an order conditionally
certifying the action captioned Fredrick Miller, On behalf of
himself and those similarly situated v. Kearnes Painting Corp.
(d/b/a AK Painting) and Arthur Kearnes, Case No. 2:16-cv-00505-
MHW-TPK (S.D. Ohio), as a collective action under the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Mr. Miller also asks the Court to designate him as representative
of a class consisting of all of the Defendants' "painter"
employees who, at any time in the last three years, worked in
excess of 40 hours in one or more workweeks, but were not paid at
one and a half times their regular hourly rate for that time.

In connection with the conditional certification, the Plaintiff
further moves the Court for an order authorizing him to send
notices of the lawsuit to putative class members that will inform
similarly situated individuals of their rights and provide them
with an opportunity to join the action consistent with the
Proposed Notice of Collective Action.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=ILByQpBr

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Eric Kmetz, Esq.
          Andrew R. Biller, Esq.
          MARKOVITS, STOCK & DEMARCO, LLC
          119 East Court Street, Suite 530
          Cincinnati, OH 45202
          Telephone: (513) 651-3700
          Facsimile: (513) 665-0219
          E-mail: ekmetz@msdlegal.com
                  abiller@msdlegal.com


KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP: Bahamas Surgery Seeks Class Certification
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bahamas Surgery Center, of the Plaintiffs in the lawsuit titled
PRIME HEALTHCARE CENTINELA, LLC, et al. v. KIMBERLY-CLARK
CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, and HALYARD HEALTH, INC., a
Delaware Corporation, Case No. 2:14-cv-08390-DMG-PLA (C.D. Cal.),
moves the Court for certification of these classes:

     (1) California Damages/Restitution Class: All entities and
         natural persons in California who purchased the
         MicroCool Gowns from February 12, 2012 up to and
         including January 11, 2015 (the "California
         Damages/Restitution Class").

     (2) California Injunctive Relief Class: All entities and
         natural persons in California who purchased the
         MicroCool Gowns from February 12, 2012 up to and
         including January 11, 2015 (the "California Injunctive
         Relief Class").

     (3) Nationwide Issue Based Class: A nationwide class of all
         entities and natural persons who purchased the MicroCool
         Gowns from February 12, 2012 up to and including
         January 11, 2015, for the resolution of the specific
         issue of whether Defendants misrepresented during the
         time period February 12, 2012 up to and including
         January 11, 2015 the liquid barrier claims relating to
         the MicroCool Gowns (e.g. whether the gowns met the AAMI
         Level 4 standard) on the gowns packaging and in their
         marketing materials and/or whether Defendants concealed
         material facts relating thereto.

The class period of the Plaintiffs' class claims is between
February 12, 2012, up to and including January 11, 2015.  Excluded
from each of these classes are (a) any governmental entity; (b)
any person or entity in which any judge, justice, or judicial
officer presiding over this matter and members of their immediate
families and judicial staff, have any controlling interest; and
(c) any partner or employee of class counsel.

The Plaintiff also asks that it be appointed as class
representative for each of the three classes, and that Michael
Avenatti, Esq., of Eagan Avenatti, LLP, be appointed as class
counsel.

The Court will commence a hearing on August 19, 2016, at 10:00
a.m., to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=O2W1z2z9

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Michael J. Avenatti, Esq.
          Ahmed Ibrahim, Esq.
          EAGAN AVENATTI, LLP
          520 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1400
          Newport Beach, CA 92660
          Telephone: (949) 706-7000
          Facsimile: (949) 706-7050
          E-mail: mavenatti@eaganavenatti.com
                  aibrahim@eaganavenatti.com


LASERSHIP INC: Faces "Knox" Suit E.D. Penn.
-------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Lasership, Inc. The case is
captioned Anthony Knox, Brian Beckett, Albert Colbert, Guy
Hollingsowrth, and Jamal Bey, individually and on behalf of a
group of individuals similarly situated, the Plaintiffs, v.
Lasership, Inc., the Defendants, Case No. 2:16-cv-02673-JCJ (E.D.
Penn., June 1, 2016). The assigned Judge is Hon. J. Curtis Joyner.

LaserShip is a last mile delivery specialist, reaching east coast
markets from Miami to Maine.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Sidney L. Gold, Esq.
          SIDNEY L. GOLD & ASSOCIATES, PC
          Eleven Penn Ctr Suite 515
          1835 Market St
          Philadelphia, PA 19103
          Telephone: (215) 569 1999
          Facsimile: (215) 569 3870
          E-mail: sgold@discrimlaw.net


LINCOLN NATIONAL: Expects Lehman Brothers Action to Be Dismissed
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lincoln National Corporation said in its Form 10-Q Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that on July 23, 2012,
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company was added as a
noteholder defendant to a putative class action adversary
proceeding ("adversary proceeding") captioned Lehman Brothers
Special Financing, Inc. v. Bank of America, N.A. et al., Adv. Pro.
No. 10-03547 (JMP) and instituted under In re Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc. in the United States Bankruptcy Court in the
Southern District of New York.  Plaintiff Lehman Brothers Special
Financing Inc. sought to recover funds paid out to noteholders in
accordance with the note agreements related to certain
collateralized debt obligation transactions.

"To avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in
litigation, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, we
have reached a confidential agreement to settle this matter.  We
expect the case to be dismissed on the filing of a Stipulation of
Dismissal with Prejudice," the Company said.

Lincoln National Corporation and its majority-owned subsidiaries
operate multiple insurance businesses through four business
segments.


MANHATTAN BEER: "Mejia" Suit to Recover OT, Damages
---------------------------------------------------
Esau Mejia, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Manhattan Beer Distributors, LLC, Simon
Berguson and Rodney Brayman, individuals, Defendants, Case No.
1:16-cv-03994 (S.D. N.Y., May 27, 2016), seeks equitable and
injunctive relief, unpaid overtime wages, unlawfully deducted
wages, liquidated damages, restitution and/or disgorgement of
profits, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, reasonable
attorney fees and such further relief pursuant to the Fair Labor
Standards Act and New York Labor Laws.

Headquartered in Brooklyn, NY, and owned by Simon Berguson and
Rodney Brayman, Manhattan Beer Distributors, LLC is a wholesale
regional distributor of beer.  Mejia worked as a truck driver and
claims to have been denied overtime pay, worked through meal
breaks, and subjected to illegal deductions.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Helen F. Dalton, Esq.
     HELEN F. DALTON & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
     69-12 Austin Street
     Forest Hills, NY 11375
     Tel: (718) 263-9591
     Fax: (718) 263-9598
     Email: avshalumovr@yahoo.com


MAYBORN USA: Recalls Spill-Proof Cups Due to Mold Risk
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Mayborn USA Inc., of Norwood, Mass., announced a voluntary recall
of about 3.1 million Tommee Tippee Sippee spill-proof cups (in
addition, 227,000 were sold in Canada). Consumers should stop
using this product unless otherwise instructed.  It is illegal to
resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.

Mold can develop on the removable, one-piece, white valve inside
the spill-proof Tommee Tippee Sippee cups when it remains
wet/moist and is infrequently cleaned. The CPSC advises that mold
ingestion poses a risk of gastrointestinal symptoms and infections
in consumers with compromised immune systems.

This recall involves five types of spill-proof Tommee Tippee
Sippee cups all with a removable, one-piece white valve. The five
types include: First Sips Transition cup, Trainer Sippee cup,
Sippee cup (including Cute Quips), Sportee bottle and Insulated
Swiggle/Sippee tumblers. The plastic drinking cups have spill-
proof tops, easy-grip sides with detachable handles and were sold
in clear with colored lids and a variety of colors and character
prints. Some of the cups include short phrases on the front of the
cups including: "You Pour I'll Fling," or "Drink Drop Repeat." The
cups have a 7 to 10 oz. capacity and were sold for children ages 4
to 12 months.

Only Tommee Tippee Sippee cups with a removable, one-piece white
valve are included in this recall.

Mayborn USA has received 3,066 reports of mold in the removable,
one-piece, opaque valve of the Sippee cups, including 68 reports
of children experiencing diarrhea, vomiting or other symptoms
associated with drinking from a cup with mold in the valve.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/hF3Xs7

The recalled products were manufactured in China and sold at
BuyBuy Baby, CVS, Giant, Kohl's, Marco Baby, Marshalls, Meijer,
Sam's Club, Ross Stores, Target, Bealls Outlet, Walgreens and Wal-
Mart and other mass merchandise stores nationwide and online at
Amazon.com, Babyhaven.com, and Diapers.com from December 2014
through May 2016 for between $4 and $7.

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled Sippee cups
and contact Mayborn to receive a free replacement cup.


MDL 2179: Nalco Still Defends Oil Spill Litigation
--------------------------------------------------
Ecolab Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2016, that Nalco Company is a defendant in
putative class action litigation related to the Deepwater Horizon
oil spill.

Nalco Company was named, along with other unaffiliated defendants,
in six putative class action complaints related to the Deepwater
Horizon oil spill: Adams v. Louisiana, et al., Case No. 11-cv-
01051 (E.D. La.); Elrod, et al. v. BP Exploration & Production
Inc., et al., 12-cv-00981 (E.D. La.); Harris, et al. v. BP, plc,
et al., Case No. 2:10-cv-02078-CJBSS (E.D. La.); Irelan v. BP
Products, Inc., et al., Case No. 11-cv-00881 (E.D. La.);
Petitjean, et al. v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-00316-RS-
EMT (N.D. Fla.); and, Wright, et al. v. BP, plc, et al., Case No.
1:10-cv-00397-B (S.D. Ala.). The cases were filed on behalf of
various potential classes of persons who live and work in or
derive income from the effected Coastal region. Each of the
actions contains substantially similar allegations, generally
alleging, among other things, negligence relating to the use of
our COREXIT dispersant in connection with the Deepwater Horizon
oil spill. The plaintiffs in these putative class action lawsuits
are generally seeking awards of unspecified compensatory and
punitive damages, and attorneys' fees and costs. These cases have
been consolidated in MDL 2179.

Other Related Claims Pending in MDL 2179

Nalco Company was also named, along with other unaffiliated
defendants, in 23 complaints filed by individuals: Alexander, et
al. v. BP Exploration & Production, et al., Case No. 11-cv-00951
(E.D. La.); Best v. British Petroleum plc, et al., Case No. 11-cv-
00772 (E.D. La.); Black v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et
al. Case No. 2:11-cv- 867, (E.D. La.); Brooks v. Tidewater Marine
LLC, et al., Case No. 11-cv- 00049 (S.D. Tex.); Capt Ander, Inc.
v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 4:10-cv-00364-RH-WCS (N.D. Fla.);
Coco v. BP Products North America, Inc., et al. (E.D. La.); Danos,
et al. v. BP Exploration et al., Case No. 00060449 (25th Judicial
Court, Parish of Plaquemines, Louisiana); Doom v. BP Exploration &
Production, et al. , Case No. 12-cv-2048 (E.D. La.); Duong, et
al., v. BP America Production Company, et al., Case No. 13-cv-
00605 (E.D. La.); Esponge v. BP, P.L.C., et al., Case No. 0166367
(32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, Louisiana);
Ezell v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 2:10-cv-01920-KDE-JCW (E.D.
La.); Fitzgerald v. BP Exploration, et al., Case No. 13-cv-00650
(E.D. La.); Hill v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 1:10-cv-00471-CG-N
(S.D. Ala.); Hogan v. British Petroleum Exploration & Production,
Inc., et al., Case No. 2012-22995 (District Court, Harris County,
Texas); Hudley v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 10-cv-00532-N (S.D.
Ala.); In re of Jambon Supplier II, L.L.C., et al., Case No. 12-
426 (E.D. La.); Kolian v. BP Exploration & Production, et al. ,
Case No. 12-cv-2338 (E.D. La.); Monroe v. BP, plc, et al., Case
No. 1:10-cv-00472-M (S.D. Ala.); Pearson v. BP Exploration &
Production, Inc., Case No. 2:11-cv-863, (E.D. La.); Shimer v. BP
Exploration and Production, et al, Case No. 2:13-cv-4755 (E.D.
La.); Top Water Charters, LLC v. BP, P.L.C., et al., No. 0165708
(32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, Louisiana);
Toups, et al. v Nalco Company, et al., Case No. 59-121 (25th
Judicial District Court, Parish of Plaquemines, Louisiana); and,
Trehern v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 1:10-cv-00432-HSO-JMR (S.D.
Miss.). The cases were filed on behalf of individuals and entities
that own property, live, and/or work in or derive income from the
effected Coastal region. Each of the actions contains
substantially similar allegations, generally alleging, among other
things, negligence relating to the use of our COREXIT dispersant
in connection with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The plaintiffs
in these lawsuits are generally seeking awards of unspecified
compensatory and punitive damages, and attorneys' fees and costs.

Pursuant to orders issued by the court in MDL 2179, the claims
were consolidated in several master complaints, including one
naming Nalco Company and others who responded to the Gulf Oil
Spill (known as the "B3 Master Complaint"). On May 18, 2012, Nalco
filed a motion for summary judgment against the claims in the "B3"
Master Complaint, on the grounds that: (i) Plaintiffs' claims are
preempted by the comprehensive oil spill response scheme set forth
in the Clean Water Act and National Contingency Plan; and (ii)
Nalco is entitled to derivative immunity from suit. On November
28, 2012, the Court granted Nalco's motion and dismissed with
prejudice the claims in the "B3" Master Complaint asserted against
Nalco. The Court held that such claims were preempted by the Clean
Water Act and National Contingency Plan. Because claims in the
"B3" Master Complaint remain pending against other defendants, the
Court's decision is not a "final judgment" for purposes of appeal.
Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a), plaintiffs will
have 30 days after entry of final judgment to appeal the Court's
decision.

Nalco Company, the incident defendants and the other responder
defendants have been named as first party defendants by Transocean
Deepwater Drilling, Inc. and its affiliates (the "Transocean
Entities") (In re the Complaint and Petition of Triton Asset
Leasing GmbH, et al, MDL No. 2179, Civil Action 10-2771). In April
and May 2011, the Transocean Entities, Cameron International
Corporation, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., M-I L.L.C.,
Weatherford U.S., L.P. and Weatherford International, Inc.
(collectively, the "Cross Claimants") filed cross claims in MDL
2179 against Nalco Company and other unaffiliated cross
defendants. The Cross Claimants generally allege, among other
things, that if they are found liable for damages resulting from
the Deepwater Horizon explosion, oil spill and/or spill response,
they are entitled to indemnity or contribution from the cross
defendants.

In April and June 2011, in support of its defense of the claims
against it, Nalco Company filed counterclaims against the Cross
Claimants. In its counterclaims, Nalco Company generally alleges
that if it is found liable for damages resulting from the
Deepwater Horizon explosion, oil spill and/or spill response, it
is entitled to contribution or indemnity from the Cross Claimants.

In December 2012 and January 2013, the MDL 2179 court issued final
orders approving two settlements between BP and Plaintiffs' Class
Counsel: (1) a proposed Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement;
and (2) a proposed Economic and Property Damages Class Action
Settlement. Pursuant to the proposed settlements, class members
agree to release claims against BP and other released parties,
including Nalco Energy Services, LP, Nalco Holding Company, Nalco
Finance Holdings LLC, Nalco Finance Holdings Inc., Nalco Holdings
LLC and Nalco Company.


MDL 2437: Interlocutory Appeal of Summary Judgment Order Okayed
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, IN RE: DOMESTIC DRYWALL ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS
DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All Direct Purchaser Actions All Indirect
Purchaser Actions, MDL No. 2437, No. 13-MD-2437 (E.D. Pa.),
Plaintiffs and Defendants submitted memoranda in response to the
Court's Order dated May 20, 2016, which evaluated Defendants'
Motions to Certify the Court's February 2016 Summary Judgment
Order for Interlocutory Appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec.  1292(b).  The
Court concluded that Defendants had satisfied their statutory
burden. To aid the Court in reaching a decision about whether and
how to exercise its discretion, the Court asked the parties to
express their preference as to whether the Court should certify
its February 2016 Order for appeal now, or delay the decision
until this Court makes a decision on Plaintiffs' Motion for Class
Certification.

The Plaintiffs urge the Court to withhold certification, arguing
that an appellate rejection of the Court's decision upholding the
Plaintiffs' conduit theory would not make any difference in the
decision denying summary judgment, particularly now that LaFarge,
the defendant for which this issue may be very important, has now
agreed to a settlement with at least the Direct Purchasers.

The Defendants argue, given the Court's conclusion that the
statutory prerequisites have been satisfied, certification at this
time would be appropriate. Prompt certification would allow the
Third Circuit to decide for itself whether to hear argument on the
conduit theory in this case, along with its anticipated
consideration of the same theory in the Vaspar litigation. The
Third Circuit would also then be able to decide whether to make
that decision without waiting for this Court's decision on the
class-action issue.

In a Memorandum dated June 3, 2016, available at
http://bit.ly/1OeoQZAfrom Leagle.com, District Judge Michael M.
Baylson held that, "In its last Order, this Court determined that
the statutory prerequisites for interlocutory appeal were
satisfied. (ECF 384) Today, the Court determines that it should
exercise its discretion to certify the Order for interlocutory
appeal because a resolution of the conduit-theory issue may
simplify issues going forward. Finally, the Court also determines
today that it should exercise its discretion promptly rather than
wait for resolution of the class certification. Although the
question is a close one, this Court has decided to certify the
Order presently because doing so will give the Third Circuit
discretion to decide, as the appellate court, whether to allow the
interlocutory appeal at this time, reject the appeal completely,
or postpone a decision until after this Court's decision on the
class certification.

"Thus, for the reasons stated above, the Court will certify its
February 2016 Summary Judgment Order for interlocutory appeal.
Although the Court recognizes that it is the Order and not a
specific question that is certified, the question the Court would
ask the Third Circuit to address is: May a fact finder conclude
that an antitrust conspiracy exists by relying in part on
circumstantial evidence that indicates that defendants
communicated through a middle-man, or conduit, even though that
middle-man is not alleged to have been a knowing participant in
the conspiracy?"


MEADOW GOLD: Recalls Whipping Cream Products
--------------------------------------------
The Meadow Gold Dairy plant in Boise is voluntarily recalling
Meadow Gold brand Old Style Whipping Cream and Meadow Gold
DairyPure brand Whipping Cream and Half and Half due to
insufficient pasteurization. It is possible that pathogens present
in raw milk, including Salmonella, Campylobacter, Listeria, and/or
E. coli, may have survived and, if ingested, could cause serious
or life threatening issues. Meadow Gold Dairy has received no
reports of illnesses related to the affected product to date and
is removing the product from the market.

Distribution of the affected product was limited in scope.
Therefore, consumers should only be concerned with products
carrying the following Individual Universal Product Codes (UPCs)
and plant code 16-05:

  Size    Name            UPC #        Code Date   Plant Code
  ----    ----            -----        ---------   ----------
  Pint    Meadow Gold     1570013313   06-24-16    16-05
          "Old Style"
          Whipping Cream
  Half    Meadow Gold     1570010018    06-24-16   16-05
  Pint    DairyPure
          Whipping Cream  1570013210    06-24-16   16-05
  Quart   Meadow Gold
          DairyPure
          Whipping Cream
  Quart   Meadow Gold     4190007913    06-17-16   16-05
          DairyPure Half
          and Half
  Gallon  Meadow Gold     1570016615    06-24-16   16-05
          DairyPure
          Whipping Cream

No other Meadow Gold Dairy products are affected by this recall.
The recall involves approximately 10,000 units of the affected
product, which was distributed in four states including Idaho,
Oregon, Wyoming and Utah through numerous retail outlets and food
service settings. The company is actively notifying customers and
is in the process of retrieving the affected product.

During a routine records review, we discovered that the product
may have been under-processed. Meadow Gold Dairy has ceased
distribution of the affected product and recovery is actively
underway. Consumers who have this product should not consume it.
They should discard it and may return the product package to the
place of purchase for a full refund or exchange. Consumers with
questions can contact the Company at 1-800-587-2259 Monday through
Friday from 8:00am to 5:00pm central time.

The Idaho Department of Agriculture's Bureau of Dairying and the
Food and Drug Administration have been notified of this recall.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/bZBNvZ


MERCEDES-BENZ USA: Callaway Seeks Certification of SUV Class
------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit styled ELIZABETH CALLAWAY, and
WILLIAM S. CALLAWAY, on behalf of themselves and all other
similarly situated v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, Case No. 8:14-cv-02011-JVS-DFM (C.D. Cal.), ask
the Court for an order certifying the case as a class action with
this class and subclass definition:

     (a) Class: All persons who purchased a new or certified
         pre-owned Mercedes Benz SUV Class Vehicle with a seat
         heater from an MBUSA authorized dealer in the State of
         California.  The "SUV Class Vehicles" include all
         (a) M-Class model years 2000 to 2007; (b) R-Class model
         years 2006 and 2007; and (c) GL-Class model year 2007
         (the "Class").  The Class Period is from January 2000 to
         the present.

     (b) Subclass: All individuals who are members of the Class
         and purchased an SUV Class Vehicle from an MBUSA
         authorized dealer in California for personal, family or
         household purposes.

Plaintiff William S. Callaway also asks the Court to appoint him
as the class representative of the Class and the Subclass.  He
also asks for an order appointing Jason M. Frank, Esq., and Scott
H. Sims, Esq., of Frank Sims & Stolper LLP; Eric F. Yuhl, Esq.,
and Colin A. Yuhl, Esq., of Yuhl Carr LLP; and Patrick McNicholas,
Esq., of McNicholas & McNicholas LLP as class counsel.

Alternatively, if the Court denies certification pursuant to Rule
23(b)(3), the Plaintiff asks certification of these issues
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(4):

   (1) Existence of Seat Heater Problem: Does a safety defect
       exist related to the seat heaters in the SUV Class
       Vehicles?

   (2) MBUSA's Knowledge of Seat Heater Problem: Was MBUSA aware
       that the seat heaters in the SUV Class Vehicles were
       malfunctioning?

   (3) MBUSA's Superior Knowledge: Was MBUSA's knowledge of the
       seat heater problem exclusive or superior to its
       customers?

   (4) Materiality: Would the seat heater problem be considered
       important to a "reasonable consumer" when determining
       whether to purchase an SUV Class Vehicle and pay the
       offered price?

   (5) Safety Concern: Does the seat heater problem present a
       safety concern that needed to be disclosed at the time of
       sale?

   (6) Failure to Disclose: Did MBUSA fail to disclose the seat
       heater problem?

   (7) Duty to Disclose: Did MBUSA have a legal duty to disclose
       the seat heater problem?

The Court will commence a hearing on August 29, 2016, at 1:30
p.m., to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=aghbo2DB

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jason M. Frank, Esq.
          Scott H. Sims, Esq.
          FRANK SIMS & STOLPER LLP
          3200 Park Center Drive
          Costa Mesa, CA 92626
          Telephone: (949) 201-2400
          Facsimile: (949) 201-2405
          E-mail: jfrank@lawfss.com
                  ssims@lawfss.com

               - and -

          Eric F. Yuhl, Esq.
          Colin A. Yuhl, Esq.
          YUHL CARR, LLP
          4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 550
          Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
          Telephone: (310) 827-2800
          Facsimile: (310) 827-4200
          E-mail: eyuhl@yuhlcarr.com
                  cayuhl@yuhlcarr.com

               - and -

          John Patrick McNicholas, IV, Esq.
          Philip Shakhnis, Esq.
          McNICHOLAS & McNICHOLAS, LLP
          10866 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1400
          Los Angeles, CA 90024
          Telephone: (310) 474-1582
          Facsimile: (310) 475-7871
          E-mail: pmc@mcnicholaslaw.com
                  ps@mcnicholaslaw.com


MIAMI-DADE COUNTY: Checker Suit Moved from Cir. Ct. to S.D. Fla.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Checker Cab Operators, Inc., a Florida Corporation, individually
and on behalf of others similarly situated, B&S Taxi Corp., a
Florida Corporation, and MIADECO Corp., a Florida Corporation, the
Plaintiffs, v. Miami-Dade County, a political subdivision of the
State of Florida, the Defendant, Case No. 16-04244, was removed
from 11th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade, to the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami).
The Southern District Court assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-21976-DPG to
the proceeding. The assigned Judge is Ho. Darrin P. Gayles.

Miami-Dade County, officially the County of Miami-Dade, is an
American county located in the southeastern part of the U.S. state
of Florida.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Ralph George Patino, Esq.
          PATINO & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
          550 Biltmore Way, Suite 740
          Coral Gables, FL 33134
          Telephone: (305) 443 6163
          Facsimile: (305) 443 5635
          E-mail: rpatino@patinolaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Bernard Pastor, Esq.
          MIAMI-DADE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
          Metro Dade Center
          111 NW 1st Street, Suite 2810
          Miami, FL 33128-1993
          Telephone: (305) 375 5151
          Facsimile: (305) 375 5634
          E-mail: pastor@miamidade.gov


MIDLAND CREDIT: Wins Summary Judgment in "Huebner" Class Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Brian M. Cogan granted the Defendants' motion for summary
judgment in the lawsuit styled LEVI HUEBNER on behalf of himself
and all other similarly situated customers v. MIDLAND CREDIT
MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, Case No. 1:14-cv-06046-
BMC (E.D.N.Y.).

The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants violated the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act by attempting to collect a $131 debt he
allegedly owed Verizon.  He argues that the Defendant's attempt to
seek an explanation from him when it marked his debt as disputed,
as well as its failure to report his debt as disputed, were both
illegal.

However, Judge Cogan said, the undisputed facts show defendant did
nothing wrong in attempting to collect this debt, even though, as
explained in a prior decision, the Plaintiff attempted to entrap
it into committing an FDCPA violation, and that defendant did
report the debt as disputed.

Judge Cogan dismissed the Plaintiff's third amended complaint and
denied the Plaintiff's motion for class certification.

A copy of the Memorandum Decision and Order is available at no
charge at http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=t69tuoUf


MILLER ALE HOUSE: "Morello" Suit to Recover OT and Minimum Pay
--------------------------------------------------------------
Breanna Morello and David Terry, on behalf of themselves and as
class representatives of all those similarly situated,
Plaintiff(s), v. Miller's Ale House, Inc. d/b/a Miller's Ale
House, Defendant(s), Case No. 2:16-cv-02715 (E.D. N.Y., May 27,
2016), seeks unpaid minimum wage, unpaid spread-of-hours,
liquidated damages, statutory penalties and attorney fees and
costs for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New
York Labor Law.

Miller's Ale House, Inc. is engaged in the restaurant business and
operates at least six chain restaurants doing business as Millers
Ale House in Suffolk, Nassau, Queens and Richmond Counties.
Plaintiffs worked as servers.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Jose G. Santiago, Esq.
     ACKERMAN, LEVINE, CULLEN, BRICKMAN & LIMMER, LLP
     1010 Northern Blvd., Suite 400
     Great Neck, NY 11021
     Tel: (516) 829-6900

          - and -

     Peter A. Romero, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF PETER A. ROMERO
     503 Route 111
     Hauppauge, NY 11788
     Tel: (631) 257-5588


MIRKA USA: Recalls Orbital Sanders Due to Fire Hazard
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Mirka USA Inc., of Twinsburg, Ohio, announced a voluntary recall
of about 2,500 Random orbital sanders (in addition about 300 were
sold in Canada) (additional CEROS 550 and 650 sanders were
recalled for a different fire hazard in January 2015). Consumers
should stop using this product unless otherwise instructed.  It is
illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer
product.

The sanders can short circuit, posing a fire hazard.

This recall involves 3-inch, 5-inch and 6-inch Mirka CEROS compact
electric random orbital sanders.  The sanders are yellow and black
with "Mirka" on the front.  A speed control lever is on the top of
the sanders and a vacuum hose connector on the rear.  The recalled
sanders came with either a cardboard box or plastic carrying case,
a 12-foot power cord, DC transformer (only in certain sanders), a
wrench, a multi-hole backup pad and assorted abrasives.  The 3-
inch sander is model CEROS 325.  The 5-inch sander is model CEROS
550.  The 6-inch sander is model CEROS 650.  Model names are on a
white sticker on the back of the sander housing beneath the hand
grip, and in certain sanders, the serial number can only be found
on this sticker.  Serial numbers are engraved on the side of the
sander housing just above the dust shroud.  Sanders with serial
numbers in the following ranges are being recalled:

  Model Number     Serial Number Range
  ------------     -------------------
  CEROS 325        3442 32028001  to  3442 32028112
  CEROS 325        3371 32024001 to 3373 32024015
  CEROS 325        3373 32028001 to 3373 32028112
  CEROS 550        3412 28672001  to  3422 28672039
  CEROS 550        3432 28672001  to  3433 28672018
  CEROS 550        3341 28672001 to 3342 28672064
  CEROS 550        3342 31326001 to 3342 31326013
  CEROS 650        3343 31322001 to 3343 31322048
  CEROS 650        3343 28673001 to 3344 28673075
  CEROS 650        3383 28673001 to 3384 28673030
  CEROS 550        TGU65241 to TGU65528
  CEROS 550        UNU62841 to UNU63176
  CEROS 650        KTN61641 to KTN61880
  CEROS 650        TCU64185 to TCU64376
  CEROS 650        VNU68337 to VNU68480
  CEROS 650        VUU65529 to VUU65720
  CEROS 650        VVU66369 to VVU66512

Mirka has received two reports of electrical shorting incidents
which included the sanders sparking and smoking. No injuries or
property damage have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/pzADVv

The recalled products were manufactured in Finland and sold at
Various distributors and independent retailers nationwide and
online at Amazon.com and BeaverTools.com from January 2013 through
March 2016 for about $500.

Consumers should immediately stop using these recalled sanders,
unplug them and contact Mirka for a free replacement sander.


MISTRAS GROUP: Plaintiff's Settlement Approval Motion Due July 5
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case, EDGAR VICERAL and DAVID KRUEGER, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MISTRAS
GROUP, INC.; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendant, Case No. 3:15-
cv-02198-EMC (N.D. Cal.), District Judge Edward M. Chen ruled that
Plaintiffs' Deadline to file their Motion For Preliminary Approval
of A Collective and Class Action Settlement is continued from June
2, 2016 to July 5, 2016. The hearing for Plaintiffs' Preliminary
Approval of A Collective and Class Action Settlement which is
currently set for June 30, 2016, is vacated. The new hearing date
for the Motion will be August 3, 2016 or August 4, 2016.

A copy of the stipulation among the parties, dated June 3, 2016,
is available at http://bit.ly/22UEprWfrom Leagle.com.

Edgar Viceral, Plaintiff, represented by Stanley Donald Saltzman,
Marlin & Saltzman, Carolyn Hunt Cottrell, Schneider Wallace
Cottrell Konecky Wotkyns LLP, Christina Ann Humphrey, Marlin &
Saltzman, Keenan Locks Klein, Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky
Wotkyns LLP, Leslie H. Joyner, Marlin Saltzman, LLP, Nicole
Nellessen Coon, Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky Wotkyns LLP,
Tina Mehr, Marlin & Saltzman LLP & Walter Lewis Haines, United
Employees Law Group, P.C..

David Krueger, Plaintiff, represented by Carolyn Hunt Cottrell,
Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky Wotkyns LLP, Stanley Donald
Saltzman, Marlin & Saltzman, Christina Ann Humphrey, Marlin &
Saltzman & Nicole Nellessen Coon, Schneider Wallace Cottrell
Konecky Wotkyns LLP.

Mistras Group, Inc., Defendant, represented by Joseph Alan
Schwachter -- jschwachter@littler.com -- Angela Joy Rafoth --
arafoth@littler.com -- and Richard Keith Chapman --
kchapman@littler.com -- at Littler Mendelson, PC.


MORGANS HOTEL: "Sinclair" Sues Over Breach of Fiduciary Duties
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jacquie Sinclair, on behalf of herself and those similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Morgans Hotel Group Co., SBEEG Holdings,
LLC, Trousdale Acquisition Sub, Inc., Howard M. Lorber, Andrew
Broad, Kenneth E. Cruse, John Dougherty, Jason T. Kalisman,
Bradford Nugent, Michael E. Olshan, Michelle S. Russo and Adam
Stein, Defendants, Case No. 652858/2016 (N.Y. Sup., May. 27,
2016), seeks preliminary and permanent enjoinment, rescissory
damages, attorney and expert fees and such other and further
relief for breach of fiduciary duties.

Morgans is a Delaware corporation and maintains its principal
executive offices at 475 Tenth Avenue, New York, NY 10018. Morgans
operates a hotel. Howard M. Lorber, Andrew Broad, Kenneth E.
Cruse, John Dougherty, Jason T. Kalisman, Bradford Nugent, Michael
E. Olshan, Michelle S. Russo and Adam Stein served in the board of
directors.

Morgans was to be acquired by SBEEG Holdings, LLC and its wholly-
owned subsidiary, Trousdale Acquisition Sub, Inc. Such transaction
was allegedly flawed, and deprives Morgans public stockholders of
the ability to participate in the Company's long-term prospects.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Evan J. Smith, Esq.
     BRODSKY & SMITH, LLC
     240 Mineola Boulevard
     Mineola, NY 11501
     Phone: (516) 741-4977
     Facsimile (561) 741-0626


NANTKWEST: "Hare" Action Alleges SEC Irregularities
---------------------------------------------------
MICHAEL HARE and NORMAN JACOBS, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Nantkwest, Inc., Patrick
Soon-Shiong, Barry I. Simon, Richard Gomberg, Steve Gorlin,
Michael D. Blaszyk, Henry Ji, Richard Kusserow, John T. Potts,
Jr., Robert Rosen, John C. Thomas, Jr., Cambridge Equities L.P.,
MP 13 Ventures LLC, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Jefferies LLC, Piper
Jaffra Y & Co., MIV & Co. LLC, Does 1 through 25, Inclusive,
Defendants, Case No. BC621836 (S.D. N.Y., May 27, 2016), seeks
compensatory damages, reasonable costs and expenses, counsel fees
and expert fees, rescission or a rescissory measure of damages and
such other and further relief under the Securities Act of 1933.

NantKwest is Delaware corporation with principal executive office
located at 9920 Jefferson Boulevard, Culver City, California
90232. NantKwest is developing pioneering cellular therapies that
improve the body's innate immune system to treat cancers,
infectious diseases and inflammatory. Patrick Soon-Shiong, Barry
I. Simon, Richard Gomberg, Steve Gorlin, Michael D. Blaszyk, Henry
Ji, Richard Kusserow, John T. Potts, Jr., Robert Rosen and John C.
Thomas, Jr. served as board of directors while Cambridge Equities
L.P., MP 13 Ventures LLC, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Jefferies LLC, Piper
Jaffra Y & Co. and MIV & Co. LLC are its underwriters.

Plaintiffs accuse defendants of drafting, issuing and
disseminating materially false and/or misleading Registration
Statements and Prospectus with the SEC.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Patrice Bishop, Esq.
     STULL, STULL & BRODY
     9430 W. Olympic Boulevard, Suite 400
     Beverly Hills, CA 90212
     Tel. (310) 209-2468
     Fax. (310) 209-2087
     Email: service@ssbla.com


NATIONAL AUTO: Faces "Mouw" Suit in D.N.J.
------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against National Auto Division, LLC. The
case is captioned Susan Mouw, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. National Auto
Division, LLC, New Jersey limited liability company, the
Defendant, Case No. 3:16-cv-02947-AET-DEA (D.N.J., June 1, 2016).
The assigned Judge is Hon. Anne E. Thompson.

National Auto provides vehicle service contracts with coverage for
new and used cars.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Stefan Louis Coleman, Esq.
          1072 Madison Ave., Ste 1
          Lakewood, NJ 08701
          Facsimile: (877) 333 9427
          E-mail: law@stefancoleman.com


NEW YORK TIMES: Settlement Talks Fail
-------------------------------------
The New York Times Company said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016, for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, that the Company is
involved in class action litigation brought on behalf of
individuals who, from 2006 to 2011, delivered newspapers at the
Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corporation ("Worcester"), a
subsidiary of the Company.  The plaintiffs are asserting several
claims against Worcester, including a challenge to their
classification as independent contractors, and seek unspecified
damages. In April 2016, the parties engaged in an unsuccessful
mediation process to resolve the litigation. The Company believes
that the claims made by the plaintiffs are without merit and
continues to vigorously defend its position. The Company is unable
to estimate a loss or range of possible losses at this time.


NOBLE HOUSE: Recalls Counter Stools Due to Laceration Hazard
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Noble House Home Furnishings LLC, of Chatsworth, Calif., announced
a voluntary recall of about 2,000 Counter stools. Consumers should
stop using this product unless otherwise instructed.  It is
illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer
product.

The kick plates of the counter stools can have a sharp edge,
posing a laceration hazard to consumers.

This recall involves Noble House's Louigi and Tate counter stools
with solid wood legs and a metallic kick pate.  The Louigi black
leather counter stool has a backrest and measures about 18 inches
wide by 26 inches deep by 41 inches tall. The backless Tate
counter stools were sold in white or brown and measure about 16.5
inches wide by 16.5 inches deep by 27 inches tall. "MADE BY:
PERMAISURI CO., LTD: No. 30 YUANCUO ROAD HONGSHANQIAO, FUZHOU,
FUJIAN 350002 CHINA" is stamped on a tag on the underside of the
stool's seat.

The firm has received six reports of the stools injuring
consumers, including scratches and cuts.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/mT3TOh

The recalled products were manufactured in China and Vietnam and
sold Online at Amazon.com, ATC.com, eBay.com,
Greatdealfurniture.com, Groupon.com, Houzz.com, Overstock.com and
Wayfair.com from October 2013 through March 2015 for about $120.

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled stools and
remove the kick plates from the stools and contact Noble House for
free replacement kick plates, including shipping.


NORTH AMERICAN BANCARD: West Loop Seeks Certification of Class
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter an order determining that
the action styled WEST LOOP CHIROPRACTIC & SPORTS INJURY CENTER,
LTD., and WEST LOOP HEALTH & SPORTS PERFORMANCE CENTER, LLC, on
behalf of plaintiffs and the class members defined herein v. NORTH
AMERICAN BANCARD, LLC, and JOHN DOES 1-10, Case No. 1:16-cv-05856
(N.D. Ill.), may proceed as a class action against Defendant North
American Bancard, LLC.  The Plaintiffs define the class as:

     For purposes of Count I, alleging violation of the Telephone
     Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. Section 227, plaintiffs
     seek to represent a class consisting of (a) all persons with
     fax numbers (b) who, on or after a date four years prior to
     the filing of this action (28 U.S.C. Section1658), (c) were
     sent faxes by or on behalf of defendant North American
     Bancard, LLC promoting its goods or services for sale (d)
     and which did not contain an opt out notice as described in
     47 U.S.C. Section 227.

The Plaintiffs further ask that they be appointed class
representatives and that Edelman, Combs, Latturner & Goodwin, LLC,
be appointed counsel for the class.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=4qm1AWgk

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Daniel A. Edelman, Esq.
          Cathleen M. Combs, Esq.
          James O. Latturner, Esq.
          Heather Kolbus, Esq.
          EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER & GOODWIN, LLC
          20 S. Clark Street, Suite 1500
          Chicago, IL 60603
          Telephone: (312) 739-4200
          Facsimile: (312) 419-0379
          E-mail: dedelman@edcombs.com


O-TEX PUMPING: Conditional Certification in "Wright" Suit Denied
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Rodney Gilstrap denied without prejudice the Plaintiff's
motion for conditional certification, for disclosure of contact
information, and for approval of notices in the lawsuit styled
JASON WRIGHT, Individually and on behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated v. O-TEX PUMPING, LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-01895-JRG (E.D.
Tex.).  Judge Gilstrap opined that although the Plaintiff has not
provided the Court with sufficient evidence to support two
company-wide classes, the evidence does suggest the existence of
current and former employees of the Defendant, who may be
similarly situated to the Plaintiff.

In his Motion, the Plaintiff seeks to certify two company-wide
classes consisting of: (1) each individual who worked as a Pump
Supervisor for Defendant at any time since November 25, 2012; and
(2) each individual who worked as a Field Supervisor for Defendant
at any time since November 25, 2012.

Judge Gilstrap also ordered targeted discovery on the issue of
conditional certification.  Judge Gilstrap said that the Plaintiff
may resubmit the Motion within 75 days from the date of the Order.
Judge Gilstrap ordered the Parties to meet and confer and
thereafter jointly submit a proposed docket control order to the
Court within 14 days that includes a defined period of immediate
discovery limited to the certification issue.

In the event that the Plaintiff chooses to refile its Motion for
Conditional Certification, the Parties are further ordered to meet
and confer within 14 days of the filing regarding any remaining
disputes relating to the form and manner of distributing any
potential notice.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=6snsFeif


OAKWOOD, OH: Thompson Seeks Certification of Class of Sellers
-------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs Jason Thompson and 2408 Hillview LLC move the Court for
an order certifying this class of plaintiffs in the action
entitled JASON THOMPSON, et al. v. CITY OF OAKWOOD, OHIO, et al.,
Case No. 3:16-cv-00169-TMR (S.D. Ohio), against City of Oakwood
and City of Oakwood Code Enforcement Officer Ethan Kroger:

     All individuals and businesses that have (1) sold houses
     within the City of Oakwood since May 25, 2010; and (2) paid
     pre-sale inspection fees to the City of Oakwood in
     conjunction with the sale of their houses.

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to declare that the Class
members are entitled to a refund of all fees paid pursuant to the
unlawful pre-sale inspection fee assessments, and to preliminarily
and permanently enjoin the Defendants from misapplying,
dissipating, or otherwise encumbering funds rightfully belonging
to the Class members.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=rC5HXcMs

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Maurice A. Thompson, Esq.
          1851 Center for Constitutional Law
          208 E. State Street
          Columbus, OH 43215
          Telephone: (614) 340-9817
          Facsimile: (614) 365-9564
          E-mail: mthompson@ohioconstitution.org

               - and -

          Christopher Finney, Esq.
          FINNEY LAW FIRM, LLC
          4270 Ivy Pointe Boulevard, Suite 225
          Cincinnati, OH 45245
          Telephone: (513) 943-6660
          Facsimile: (513) 943-6669
          E-mail: Chris@Finneylawfirm.com


OHIO, USA: Williams Seeks Certification of Dayton Prisoners Class
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit titled Melody L. Williams v. Ohio
Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al., Case No. 3:15-cv-
00388-TMR-MRM (S.D. Ohio), moves the Court for class
certification.  The Plaintiff also asks the Court to appoint an
interim counsel until a permanent counsel can be appointed.

The Plaintiff alleges that all prisoners at the Dayton
Correctional Institution are denied the constitutional right of
access in resolution of the First Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution.  The Plaintiff also cites the alleged inadequate
conditions of the legal library and its practices and procedures.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=OiSn7PKW


OSPREY CHILD: Recalls Child Backpack Carriers Due to Fall Risk
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Osprey Child Safety Products LLC, of Cortez, Colo., announced a
voluntary recall of about 31,000 Child backpack carriers.
Consumers should stop using this product unless otherwise
instructed.  It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a
recalled consumer product.

A cut in the plastic buckle on the shoulder strap can cause the
shoulder strap to release, posing a fall hazard to a child in the
carrier.

This recall involves the Poco AG, Poco AG Plus and Poco AG Premium
model child backpack carriers. These nylon carriers come in
seaside blue, ivy green and black. They have a metal frame and a
gray padded child's seat inside. The back of the carrier also has
an upper zippered pocket and a lower zipped compartment, along
with a stretch pocket in the middle. The production date code
identifying when the carrier was manufactured is stamped on a
black label sewn in the interior of the large lower zippered
compartment in the back of the carrier. Recalled carriers have a
production date code of S16SB03, S16SB04, S16SB05, S16SB06 or
S16SB07. "Osprey" is printed on the back at the top of the
carrier. The model name is printed on the back at the bottom.

No consumer incidents have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/hAZqLb

The recalled products were manufactured in Vietnam and sold at REI
and specialty outdoor retailers nationwide and online at
amazon.com and rei.com from January 2016 through May 2016 for
between $250 and $330.

Consumers should immediately inspect the buckles on both straps of
the carrier harness to determine if there is a cut in the plastic
buckle on one or both straps. If the buckle is cut, consumers
should immediately stop using the carrier and contact Osprey for a
free replacement or full refund. Consumers also may contact Osprey
and return the carrier for inspection. If the buckle is cut,
consumers will receive a replacement or full refund.


PALATINE, IL: Certification of Class Sought in "Collins" Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Collins moves the Court to enter an order certifying the
action styled MICHAEL COLLINS, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated v. THE VILLAGE OF PALATINE, ILLINOIS, a
Municipal Corporation, Case No. 1:16-cv-03814 (N.D. Ill.), as a
class action.

The "Class" and "Class Members" are defined as:

     All individuals whose "personal information" from their
     "motor vehicle record" (as those terms are defined in 18
     U.S.C. Section 2725) was disclosed by the Village of
     Palatine on a parking citation issued between August 28,
     2006 and August 30, 2010 without the express written consent
     of the individual to whom the information pertains.

Mr. Collins also asks the Court for an order appointing Martin J.
Murphy, Esq., as class counsel, and appointing the Plaintiff as
class representative.  He further asks the Court to bifurcate the
Case into two phases, a liability phase and a damages phase.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=nTWsmQQE

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Martin J. Murphy, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF MARTIN J. MURPHY
          1222 W. Arthur Ave.
          Chicago, IL 60626
          Telephone: (312) 933-3200
          E-mail: mjm@law-murphy.com


PFIZER INC: "Ulbinsky" Sues Over Viagra Side Effects
----------------------------------------------------
John R. Ulbinsky, Plaintiff, v. Pfizer Inc., Defendant, Case No.
3:16-cv-02869 (N.D. Cal., May 27, 2016), seeks compensatory
damages, punitive damages, equitable relief and such other relief
arising from negligence, strict products liability, breach of
implied and express warranty, fraudulent misrepresentation,
fraudulent concealment and negligent misrepresentation.

Pfizer Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws
of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in
the State of New York. It is engaged in the business of designing,
developing, manufacturing, labeling, promoting, marketing,
distributing and selling pharmaceutical drugs, including Viagra.

Plaintiff contracted melanoma allegedly as a result of ingesting
Viagra.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Kimberly D. Barone Baden, Esq.
     Ann E. Rice Ervin, Esq.
     MOTLEY RICE LLP
     28 Bridgeside Boulevard
     Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
     Tel: (843) 216-9265
     Fax: (843) 216-9450
     Email: kbarone@motleyrice.com
            ariceervin@motleyrice.com


PFIZER INC: "Kersmarki" Sues Over Viagra Side Effects
-----------------------------------------------------
Paul L. Kersmarki, Sr., Plaintiff, v. Pfizer Inc., Defendant, Case
No. 3:16-cv-02867 (N.D. Cal., May 27, 2016), seeks compensatory
damages, punitive damages, equitable relief and such other relief
arising from negligence, strict products liability, breach of
implied and express warranty, fraudulent misrepresentation,
fraudulent concealment and negligent misrepresentation.

Pfizer Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws
of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in
the State of New York. It is engaged in the business of designing,
developing, manufacturing, labeling, promoting, marketing,
distributing and selling pharmaceutical drugs, including Viagra.

Plaintiff contracted a confirmed malignant melanoma in situ with
the proliferation extending into the surgical margins allegedly as
a result of ingesting Viagra.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Kimberly D. Barone Baden, Esq.
     Ann E. Rice Ervin, Esq.
     MOTLEY RICE LLP
     28 Bridgeside Boulevard
     Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
     Tel: (843) 216-9265
     Fax: (843) 216-9450
     Email: kbarone@motleyrice.com
            ariceervin@motleyrice.com


PRIMESOURCE HEALTH CARE: "Wilson" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
--------------------------------------------------------------
Henrietta Wilson, Latashia Clifton, Kendra Bhagmath, Megan
Lafaire, Aries Fisk, Juanita Nicholson, Latahsa Morton and Teyonna
Melton v. Primesource Health Care Of Ohio, Inc. c/o Incorp
Services, Inc., Primesource Health Care Systems, Inc. and David
Fleming, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-01298 (N.D. Ohio, May 27,
2016), seeks minimum wage, and/or denied overtime, liquidated
damages, costs and disbursements and reasonable allowances for
fees of counsel and experts, reimbursement of expenses and such
other and further relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act and
the Ohio Wage Act.

PrimeSource provides mobile healthcare, serving seniors in long-
term nursing facilities. It contracts with participating nursing
homes throughout Ohio for the purposes of furnishing optometrist,
audiologist, dentist, and podiatrist to the patients of these
facilities. Wilson, Lafaire, Fisk, Nicholson, Morton and Melton
worked as clinical assistants while Clifton and Bhagmath worked as
a patient assistant for Primesource. They claim to be denied
overtime pay.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Chris P. Wido, Esq.
     Brian D. Spitz, Esq.
     THE SPITZ LAW FIRM, LLC
     25200 Chagrin Boulevard, Suite 200
     Beachwood, OH 44122
     Phone: (216) 291-4744
     Fax: (216) 291-5744
     Email: chris.wido@spitzlawfirm.com


PUBLIX SUPER: Recalls Nut, Seed and Raisin Mix Due to Listeria
--------------------------------------------------------------
Publix Super Markets is issuing a voluntary recall for Nut, Seed
and Raisin mix because it may be adulterated with Listeria
monocytogenes.  Publix received notification of the potential
contamination from the sunflower seed supplier, Flagstone Foods,
who were effected by an expanded recall of SunOpta. The containers
of prepackaged nut, seed and raisin mix were sold at Publix retail
produce departments in Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama,
Tennessee and North Carolina with a UPC of 000-41415-08886, 002-
25143-00000, 004-00002-10396, and include all date lots.

Consumption of products containing Listeria monocytogenes can
cause serious and sometimes fatal infection in young children,
frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems.
Although healthy individuals may suffer only short-term symptoms
such as high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal
pain and diarrhea, Listeria infection can cause miscarriages and
stillbirths among pregnant women.

"As part of our commitment to food safety, potentially impacted
product has been removed from all store shelves," said Maria
Brous, Publix media and community relations director. "To date,
there have been no reported cases of illness. Consumers who have
purchased the products in question may return the product to their
local store for a full refund. Publix customers with additional
questions may call our Consumer Relations department at 1-800-242-
1227 or by visiting our website at www.publix.comdisclaimer icon.
Customers can also contact the US Food and Drug Administration at
1-888-SAFEFOOD (1-888-723-3366)."

Publix is privately owned and operated by its 179,500 employees,
with 2015 sales of $32.4 billion. Currently Publix has 1,116
stores in Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina and
North Carolina. The company has been named one of Fortune's "100
Best Companies to Work For in America" for 19 consecutive years.
In addition, Publix's dedication to superior quality and customer
service is recognized among the top in the grocery business.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/0YmTvV


PVH CORPORATION: Faces "Ramos" Suit in Cal. Super. Ct.
------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against PVH Corporation. The case is
captioned Maria Ramos, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. PVH Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, and Does 1-100, inclusive, the Defendant, Case No.
CGC 16 552326 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 1, 2016).

PVH owns, designs, sources and markets a selection of world-
renowned brands in the dress shirts, sportswear, neckwear,
footwear, and accessories categories


RANDY'S TRUCKING: "Phillips" Suit Seeks OT Pay, Damages
-------------------------------------------------------
William Phillips, an Individual, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Randy's Trucking, Inc.,
Randy Gene Griffith, Kyle Griffith, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-at-
00396 (E.D. Cal., May 27, 2016), seeks damages for unpaid
overtime, liquidated damages, damages for meal-break premiums not
paid, penalties and damages pursuant to the Labor Code;
restitution and disgorgement for all unfair business practices;
prejudgment and post judgment interest; cost of suit and attorney
fees and such other and further relief pursuant to the Fair Labor
Standards Act and the California Labor Laws.

Randy's Trucking is an oilfield service company that provides
various support services to the petroleum industry, as well as
providing minor other services to other industries. Phillips
worked as a truck operator, supplying critical water supplies to
oil rigs and other oil field operations.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Michael L. Tracy, Esq.,
     LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL TRACY
     2030 Main Street, Suite 1300
     Irvine, CA 92614
     Tel: (949) 260-9171
     Fax: (866) 365-3051
     Email: mtracy@michaeltracylaw.com


RESULTS COMPANIES: Mulligan Seeks Certification of FLSA Class
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit titled DIANNA MULLIGAN, MICHAEL
MULLIGAN AND ADRIAN FLORES v. THE RESULTS COMPANIES LLC, Case No.
2:16-cv-00040 (S.D. Tex.), file their motion for conditional
certification of a collective action, for notice to potential
plaintiffs, and for production of information necessary for the
notice.

The Mulligans and Flores seek conditional certification of a class
defined as:

     Current and former individuals employed at The Results
     Companies LLC Corpus Christi, Texas call center as an
     Associate Trainer, Associate, Inbound Sales Representative,
     Outbound Sales Representative, Customer Service
     Representative, Customer Retention Agent, or Other
     Telephone-Dedicated Employee from January 27, 2013 to the
     present. This definition includes all hourly paid,
     telephone-dedicated employees in all departments regardless
     of precise job title.

The Plaintiffs allege that Results Companies has violated the Fair
Labor Standards Act by failing to pay them, and all of its other
hourly paid, telephone-dedicated call center workers for all hours
worked.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=A7JyO368

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Jennifer J. Spencer, Esq.
          Mary L. Scott, Esq.
          James E. Hunnicutt, Esq.
          SPENCER SCOTT PLLC
          Two Lincoln Centre
          5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 300
          Dallas, TX 75240-6271
          Telephone: (972) 458-5319
          Facsimile: (972) 770-2156
          E-mail: jspencer@spencerscottlaw.com
                  mscott@spencerscottlaw.com
                  jhunnicutt@spencerscottlaw.com


RESURGENT CAPITAL: Wins Prelim. Nod of "Fritz" Suit Settlement
--------------------------------------------------------------
After reviewing the Plaintiffs' unopposed written submissions, the
Hon. Frederic Block preliminarily approves the class action
settlement in the lawsuit titled GISELLE FRITZ, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated, et al. v. RESURGENT
CAPITAL SERVICES, LP, et al., Case No. 1:11-cv-03300-FB-PK
(E.D.N.Y.).

Judge Block said the proposed settlement appears to be the product
of serious, informed, non-collusive negotiation, has no obvious
deficiencies, does not improperly grant preferential treatment to
class representatives or segments of the class and falls within
the range of possible approval.

The Court also grants certification for settlement purposes of the
proposed class and subclasses because the elements necessary for
class certification are present, namely numerosity, commonality,
and typicality.  The Court also appoints Ahmad Keshavarz, Esq.,
Charles M. Delbaum, Esq., and Mattew Schedler, Esq., as class
counsel.

Judge Block directed the Class Counsel to mail individual notices
to all class members by June 15, 2016.  Class members are be
permitted to object in writing to class counsel within 30 days
after receiving the notice but no later than August 1, 2016.

A fairness hearing for final approval of the settlement is
scheduled for September 9, 2016, at 11:00 a.m.

A copy of the Order is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=s5GD1XoW


RHEEM SALES: Recalls Electric Water Heaters Due to Burn Hazard
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Rheem Sales Company Inc., of Montgomery, Ala., announced a
voluntary recall of about 54,000 Rheem electric water heaters.
Consumers should stop using this product unless otherwise
instructed.  It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a
recalled consumer product.

The control panel on the water heaters can overheat, posing fire
and burn hazards.

This recall involves Rheem brand "Performance Platinum" electric
water heaters in 40, 50 and 80 gallon capacities. The recalled
water heaters are gray and have the "Performance Platinum" Rheem
logo decal on the front above the thermostat control panel. The
water heaters have a rating plate near the bottom of the unit with
the model number, date of manufacture and serial number. Recalled
water heaters have the following model number and have a serial
number within the following ranges:

  Model Number   Serial Number Ranges       Date Code
  ------------   --------------------       ---------
XE40M12EC55U0    A0114XXXXX to A5214XXXXX   01Jan2014 - 21Dec2014
                 M0114XXXXX to M5214XXXXX3  0Jan2015
                 Q0114XXXXX to Q5214XXXXX   03Mar2015 - 13Apr2015
                 A0515XXXXX
                 A1015XXXXX to A1615XXXXX   01Jan2014 - 21Dec2014
XE50M12EC55U0    A0114XXXXX to A5214XXXXX   30Jan2015
                 M0114XXXXX to M5214XXXXX   03Mar2015 - 13Apr2015
                 Q0114XXXXX to Q5214XXXXX
                 A0515XXXXX
                 A1015XXXXX to A1615XXXXX   1Jan2014 - 21Dec2014
XE50T12EC55U0    A0114XXXXX to A5214XXXXX
                 M0114XXXXX to M5214XXXXX
                 Q0114XXXXX to Q5214XXXXX

XE80T12EC55U0    A0114XXXXX to A5214XXXXX   1Jan2014 - 21Dec2014
                 M0114XXXXX to M5214XXXXX
                 Q0114XXXXX to Q5214XXXXX


The firm has received 296 reports of control panels overheating,
including one report of a fire which resulted in $5,800 in
property damage. No injuries have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/C1txk7

The recalled products were manufactured in U.S. and Mexico and
sold at The Home Depot stores nationwide and online from January
2014 through April 2016 for between $450 and $720.

Consumers should immediately turn off and stop using the recalled
water heaters. Consumers should contact Rheem to request a free
repair by a Rheem field technician.


ROBERTSON'S READY MIX: "Peruch" Suit Seeks Unpaid Wages
-------------------------------------------------------
Steve Peruch and Edward Fletcher, individually, and on behalf of
other similarly situated class members Plaintiffs, v. Robertson's
Ready Mix, Ltd. Does 1-10, inclusive, Defendants, Case No.
BC622016 (Cal. Super., May 27, 2016), seeks denied meal and rest
periods, unpaid wages, waiting-time penalties and reasonable
attorney fees and costs under the California Private Attorneys
General Act, Unfair Competition Law and the Labor Code and
California Code of Civil Procedure.

Robertson's Ready Mix, Ltd. is a ready-mix concrete company
headquartered in Corona, California and operating ready mix
concrete plants located in Los Angeles, Pasadena, Long Beach,
Palmdale, Irwindale, Rosewood and Santa Fe Springs. Peruch worked
as a ready-mix concrete truck driver.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Howard Z. Rosen, Esq.
     Jason C. Marsili, Esq.
     Brianna M. Primozic, Esq.
     Amanda Pitrof, Esq.
     POSNER & ROSEN LLP
     3600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800
     Los Angeles, CA 90010-2679
     Telephone No. (213) 389-6050
     Facsimile No. (213) 389-0663


RUBY TUESDAY: Class Certification Sought in "Krystek" Suit
----------------------------------------------------------
Dennis Krystek files with the Court a motion for class
certification, to appoint him as class representative, and to
appoint the law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as Class
Counsel and Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison, LLC as Liaison
Counsel in the lawsuit styled DENNIS KRYSTEK, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC., et
al., Case No. 3:14-cv-01119 (M.D. Tenn.).

The proposed class consists of:

     All persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly
     traded common stock of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. between April 10,
     2013 and July 24, 2013, inclusive, and who were damaged
     thereby. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, the
     officers and directors of the Company, at all relevant
     times, members of their immediate families and their legal
     representatives, heirs, successors or assigns and any entity
     in which Defendants have or had a controlling interest.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=jJr6syE9

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Laurie L. Largent, Esq.
          Ashley M. Price, Esq.
          ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
          655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 231-1058
          Facsimile: (619) 231-7423
          E-mail: lauriel@rgrdlaw.com
                  aprice@rgrdlaw.com

               - and -

          Jerry E. Martin, Esq.
          Christopher M. Wood, Esq.
          ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
          414 Union Street, Suite 900
          Nashville, TN 37219
          Telephone: (615) 244-2203
          Facsimile: (615) 252-3798
          E-mail: jmartin@rgrglaw.com
                  cwood@rgrdlaw.com

               - and -

          Timothy L. Miles, Esq.
          Scott P. Tift, Esq.
          BARRETT JOHNSTON MARTIN & GARRISON, LLC
          Bank of America Plaza
          414 Union Street, Suite 900
          Nashville, TN 37219
          Telephone: (615) 244-2202
          Facsimile: (615) 252-3798
          E-mail: tmiles@barrettjohnston.com
                  stift@barrettjohnston.com

               - and -

          Frank J. Johnson, Esq.
          JOHNSON & WEAVER, LLP
          600 West Broadway, Suite 1540
          San Diego, CA 92101
          Telephone: (619) 230-0063
          Facsimile: (619) 255-1856
          E-mail: frankj@johnsonandweaver.com

               - and -

          Michael I. Fistel, Jr., Esq.
          JOHNSON & WEAVER, LLP
          40 Powder Springs Street
          Marietta, GA 30064
          Telephone: (770) 200-3104
          Facsimile: (770) 200-3101
          E-mail: michaelf@johnsonandweaver.com


S2VERIFY: Hawkins Seeks Certification of Class in California
------------------------------------------------------------
Regmon L. Hawkins moves the Court for an order certifying a class
of consumers in the lawsuit styled REGMON HAWKINS, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. S2VERIFY, a
foreign limited liability company, Case No. 3:15-CV-03502-WHA
(N.D. Cal.).  The proposed class consists of:

     (1) Regmon L. Hawkins and (2) all other natural persons
     within the United States (including all territories and
     other political subdivisions of the United States) (a) who
     were the subject of a consumer report S2VERIFY furnished to
     Chase Professionals, IPC International, Inc., Foodtemps,
     Inc. d/b/a Foodstaff, Mississippi Gaming Commission,
     StaffMasters, Inc., T&T Staff Management, Inc., Tarrant
     Regional Water District, TRC Staffing Services, or United
     Refining Company, (b) from June 16, 2013 through
     February 28, 2014, and (c) whose report contained any public
     record of criminal arrest, charge, information, indictment,
     or other adverse item of information other than records of
     an actual conviction of a crime, which antedated the report
     by more than 7 years.

Excluded from the class definition are any employees, officers, or
directors of S2VERIFY, any attorneys appearing in the Case, and
any judges assigned to hear the Case as well as their immediate
family and staff.

The Plaintiff further seeks an order appointing the Plaintiff as a
proper representative of the Class, and appointing the law firms
of Caddell & Chapman and DHF Law, P.C. as Class Counsel, with
Caddell & Chapman serving as Lead Class Counsel.

The Court will commence a hearing on July 21, 2016, at 8:00 a.m.,
to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=orojZYAo

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael A. Caddell, Esq.
          Cynthia B. Chapman, Esq.
          Amy E. Tabor, Esq.
          Benjamin C. Wickert, Esq.
          CADDELL & CHAPMAN
          1331 Lamar, Suite 1070
          Houston, TX 77010-3027
          Telephone: (713) 751-0400
          Facsimile: (713) 751-0906
          E-mail: mac@caddellchapman.com
                  cbc@caddellchapman.com
                  aet@caddellchapman.com
                  bcw@caddellchapman.com

               - and -

          Devin H. Fok, Esq.
          DHF LAW
          234 Colorado Blvd., 8th Floor
          Pasadena CA 91101
          Telephone: (310) 430-9933
          Facsimile: (818) 484-2023
          E-mail: devin@devinfoklaw.com


SALAAM BOMBAY: Faces "Zhu" Suit in S.D.N.Y.
-------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Salaam Bombay, Inc. The case is
captioned Guang Ping Zhu, on behalf of himself and all other
persons similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Salaam Bombay, Inc.,
and Ramesh Shah, the Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-04091 (S.D.N.Y.,
June 1, 2016).

Salaam Bombay offers Indian Cuisine menu. It receives orders
through Indian food Delivery Online.

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


SAM WON GAHK: Faces "Pichol" Suit in E.D.N.Y.
---------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Sam Won Gahk, Inc. The case is
captioned Damian Sis Pichol and Francisco Sis Pichol, individually
and on behalf of others similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Sam
Won Gahk, Inc., doing business as: Sam Won Gahk, the Defendants,
Case No. #: 1:16-cv-02759 (E.D.N.Y., June 1, 2016).

The Defendant is a modest place for traditional Korean-Chinese
fare such as jajangmyeon (noodles in black bean sauce).

The Plaintiffs appears pro se.


SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS: "Coleman-Anacleto" Suit Moved to N.D. Cal.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cindy Coleman-Anacleto, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated, the Plaintiff, v. Samsung Electronics America,
Inc., a Corporation, the Defendant, Case No. 16CV294533 was
removed from Santa Clara Superior Court, to the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose).
The Northern District Court assigned Case No. 5:16-cv-02941.to the
proceeding.

Samsung Electronics supplies consumer electronics and digital
products in the United States.

The Plaintiff appears pro se.


SBS TRANSPORT: "Hagen" Sues Over OT Pay, Illegal E-mail Access
--------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Hagen, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SBS Transport, LLC, and Marko
Franovic, an individual, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-00627 (W.D.
Mich., May 27, 2016), seeks unpaid wages, liquidated damages
reasonable attorney fees and costs under the Fair Labor Standards
Act, Workforce Opportunity Wage Act, the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act and the Stored Communications Act.

SBS Transport, LLC is a Michigan Limited Liability Company located
in Kent County, Michigan where Plaintiff was a dispatcher.

Defendants misclassified Plaintiff as an independent contractor
and failed to pay him the minimum wage for all hours worked as
well as an overtime premium. Furthermore, Defendants allegedly
intercepted Plaintiff's e-mail without his consent.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     C. Christopher Newberg, Esq.
     RODENHOUSE KUIPERS, P.C.
     678 Front Ave., NW, Suite 176
     Grand Rapids, MI 49504
     Tel: (616) 451-4000
     Fax: (616) 451-4114
     Email: Chris@rodenhouselaw.com


SCHLEE & STILLMAN: Faces "Feldbrand" Suit in E.D.N.Y.
-----------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Schlee & Stillman, LLC. The case
is captioned Abraham Feldbrand, on behalf of himself and all other
similarly situated consumers, the Plaintiff, v. Schlee & Stillman,
LLC, the Defendant, Case No. 1:16-cv-02781 (E.D.N.Y., June 1,
2016).

Schlee & Stillman is a debt collector firm.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Adam Jon Fishbein, Esq.
          483 Chestnut Street
          Cedarhurst, NY 11516
          Telephone: (516) 791 4400
          Facsimile: (516) 791 4411
          E-mail: fishbeinadamj@gmail.com


SID WAINER: Recalls Tart Shell Products Due to Tree Nuts
--------------------------------------------------------
Sid Wainer & Son of New Bedford, MA is voluntarily recalling
Domaine de Provence La Cucina Tart Shells and Domaine de Provence
Neutral 3" Cone Tart Shells due to undeclared allergens. People
who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to Tree Nuts,
specifically Coconut and Eggs run the risk of a serious or life-
threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products. The
product is safe for consumption by those who do not have Coconut
or Egg allergy.

The product is packaged in a brown cardboard box labeled as:

Domaine de Provence La Cucina Tart Shells, 252 pieces per box
containing undeclared Eggs with UPC 708152149119

Domaine de Provence Neutral 3" Cone Tart Shells, 308 pieces per
box containing undeclared Coconut UPC 708152316856

Both tarts were distributed Nationwide to Food service
establishments.

No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this
problem.

The private manufacturer for Sid Wainer and Son discovered an
ingredient change that consisted of an allergen that was not
declared on the labels.

Consumers who have purchased the above mentioned products are
urged to return them to the place of purchase or dispose of the
products. Consumers with questions may contact the company at 1-
800-423-8333 at extension 168 or 119 between the hours of 9:00 am
and 5:00 pm.

This recall is being initiated with the knowledge of the Food and
Drug Administration.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/3eulGU


SOLOMON SNACKS: Recalls Meat Pie Products Due to Misbranding
------------------------------------------------------------
Solomon Snacks and Bakery, a New Brighton, Minn. establishment, is
recalling approximately 873 pounds of meat pie products that were
produced without the benefit of federal inspection and due to
misbranding and undeclared allergens, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced
today. The products contain eggs, milk, and wheat, known
allergens, which are not declared on the finished product label.

The beef, chicken, and turkey meat pie items were produced on
various dates from Feb. 2016 to May 2016. The following products
are subject to recall:

  --- 5-oz. packages containing one "Solomon Snacks and Bakery
      Meat Pie Beef,"
  --- 5-oz. packages containing one "Solomon Snacks and Bakery
      Meat Pie Chicken,"
  --- 5-oz. packages containing one "Solomon Snacks and Bakery
      Meat Pie Turkey,"

Unlabeled Styrofoam boxes lined with wax paper containing 5-oz.
frozen meat pie products produced by Solomon Snacks and Bakery.
The products subject to recall do not bear the USDA mark of
inspection. These items were shipped to retail locations in
Illinois and Minnesota. The products distributed in Illinois were
in Styrofoam boxes and void of all labeling.

The problem was discovered by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), which notified FSIS.

There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to
consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about a reaction
should contact a healthcare provider.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to
consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to
the place of purchase.


SPD SWISS: Bid for Class Certification in "Olvera" Suit Stricken
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Court filed a civil minutes relating to two motions before the
Hon. Josephine L. Staton in the lawsuit titled Amanda Olvera v.
SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics GMBH, et al., Case No. 8:15-cv-
02035-JLS-JCG (C.D. Cal.).  The two motions are the Defendants'
motion to dismiss and the Plaintiff's motion for class
certification.

Buried in one of the multitude of "WHEREAS" clauses in a document
titled "Joint Stipulation to Continue the Scheduling Conference,"
filed on April 26, 2016, the parties agreed that, as a result of
the filing of a First Amended Complaint by Plaintiff, "the Motion
to Dismiss the Complaint and the Class Certification Motion were
rendered moot and the hearing with respect to those motions should
be vacated," according to the Civil Minutes.  Hence, the Court
strikes the two Motions and vacates the hearing set for June 3,
2016.

A copy of the Civil Minutes is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=l9IDOSGd


STANDARD DISTRIBUTION: "Castro" Suit Moved to E.D. Cal.
-------------------------------------------------------
John Castro, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated
and the general public, the Plaintiff. v. Standard Distribution
Co., a Iowa Corporation, the Defendant, Case No. 2019751, was
removed from Stanislaus County Superior Court, to the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of California (Fresno).
The Eastern District Court assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-00758-DAD-SAB
to the proceeding. The assigned Judge is Hon. Dale A. Drozd.

Standard Distribution is a Third Party Logistics (3PL) company
that provides both dedicated and multi-client warehousing
services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Michael R. Hoffman, Esq.
          Stephen Noel III, Esq.
          HOFFMAN EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS, P.C.
          580 California Street, Suite 1600
          San Francisco, CA 94104
          Telephone: (415) 362 1111
          Facsimile: (415) 362 1112
          E-mail: mhoffman@employment-lawyers.com
                  silg@employment-lawyers.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Enedina Salome Cardenas, Esq.
          Julie Grace Yap, Esq.
          Michelle L. Christian, Esq.
          Nick C. Geannacopulos, Esq.
          SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
          400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
          Sacramento, CA 95814
          Telephone: (916) 498 7019
          Facsimile: (916) 558 4839
          E-mail: ecardenas@seyfarth.com
                  jyap@seyfarth.com
                  mchristian@seyfarth.com
                  ngeannacopulos@seyfarth.com


SUGAR TRANSPORT: Stipulation Over Class Action Notice Entered
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ryan Guinn and Sugar Transport of the Northwest, Inc., entered
into a stipulation with regard to providing notice of Guinn's
class action lawsuit to putative class members consisting of the
Defendant's former driver employees in California.

The case is, RYAN GUINN, an individual, on behalf of himself, and
on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.
SUGAR TRANSPORT OF THE NORTHWEST, INC., a California corporation,
and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants, No. 2:16-cv-00325-WBS-EFB
(E.D. Cal.).  District Judge William B. Shubb presides over the
case.

A copy of the Stipulation is available at http://bit.ly/1U8HSzR
from Leagle.com.

Attorneys for Plaintiff Ryan Guinn and the Putative Class Members:

     James L. Pagano, Esq.
     Ian A. Kass, Esq.
     PAGANO & KASS, APC
     96 North Third Street, Suite 525
     San Jose, CA 95112
     Telephone: (408) 999-5678

Attorneys for Defendant Sugar Transport of the Northwest, Inc.:

     Alan S. Levins, Esq.
     LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
     650 California Street, 20th Floor
     San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
     Telephone: 415.433.1940

          - and -

     John H. Adams, Jr., Esq.
     LITTLER MENDELSON
     500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000
     Sacramento, CA 95814
     Telephone: (916) 830-7200


SUN TRANSACTIONS: Central Alarm Seeks Certification of Class
------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned CENTRAL ALARM SIGNAL, INC.,
a Michigan corporation, individually and as the representative of
a class of similarly-situated persons v. SUN TRANSACTIONS
ADVISORS, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10, Case No. 2:16-cv-11950-GER-APP
(E.D. Mich.), files a "placeholder" motion for class certification
in order to prevent against a "buy-off" attempt, a tactic class-
action defendants sometimes use to attempt to prevent a case from
proceeding to a decision on class certification by attempting to
"moot" the named plaintiff's claims by tendering the plaintiff
individual (but not classwide) relief.

The Plaintiff proposes this class definition:

     All persons who (1) on or after four years prior to the
     filing of this action, (2) were sent telephone facsimile
     messages of material advertising the commercial availability
     or quality of any property, goods, or services by or on
     behalf of Defendants, and (3) which Defendants did not have
     prior express permission or invitation, or (4) which did not
     display a proper opt-out notice.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=hourPdX0

Central Alarm Signal, Inc., is represented by:

          Brian J. Wanca, Esq.
          Ryan M. Kelly, Esq.
          Ross M. Good, Esq.
          ANDERSON + WANCA
          3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500
          Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
          Telephone: (847) 368-1500
          Facsimile: (847) 368-1501
          E-mail: bwanca@andersonwanca.com
                  rkelly@andersonwanca.com
                  RGood@andersonwanca.com


SUNSHINE USA: "Zhang" Suit to Recover OT, Costs and Expenses
------------------------------------------------------------
Meide Zhang and Zhongliang Qiu, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Liang Zhang and Ru Qiu
Li as shareholders and corporate officers and Sunshine USA Inc.
d/b/a Wu Liang Ye, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-04013 (S.D. N.Y.,
May 29, 2016), seeks unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime wages,
unreimbursed business related out-of-pocket costs and expenses,
unpaid spread-of-hours pay, liquidated damages, post-judgment
interest and attorney fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act and
New York Labor Laws.

Sunshine USA Inc. is a restaurant, organized and existing under
the laws of the State of New York with a principal place of
business located at 36 West 48th Street, New York, NY 10036.
Plaintiffs worked in food delivery and claims to be denied
overtime pay.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     David Yan, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF DAVID YAN
     136-20 38th Avenue, Suite 11E
     Flushing, NY 11354
     Tel: (718) 888-7788


SWEET EARTH: Recalls Big Sur Burrito Due to Packaging Error
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sweet Earth Natural Foods is voluntarily recalling its Big Sur
Burrito, 7 oz, due to a packaging error. As a result, a small
number of these products contain an undeclared milk allergen. The
precautionary recall was necessitated when it was discovered that
a small quantity of Santa Cruz Burritos were packaged into Big Sur
Burrito pouches. The Santa Cruz Burrito contains milk in the form
of cheese, which is not listed as an allergen on the Big Sur
Burrito pouch, therefore posing a potential risk to people who
have an allergy to milk.

In some individuals the consumption of milk could present a
serious or life-threatening allergic reaction.

These retail products were distributed nationwide from our
manufacturing facility between the dates of March 30, 2016 and May
6, 2016.

Recalled Products:

Big Sur    7 oz      UPC, 7 oz Unit      Lot 6090   Best By
Burrito    Burrito   #016741111127                  3/30/2017
                     UPC, 12-pack
                     Case #016741111134

There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to
consumption of this product.

Consumers who have purchased this product, Big Sur Lot 6090, are
urged to discard of any product and contact Sweet Earth, Inc. for
a full refund. Consumers with questions may contact the company at
1-831-741-4569, 1-310-613-4751, or 1-831-375-8673, Monday through
Friday, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM PST.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/6TMieN


SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES: Seeks to Limit Securities Suit Class Period
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Lead Plaintiff and the Defendants in the consolidated lawsuit
styled In re Symbol Technologies, Inc., Securities Litigation,
Case No. 2:05-cv-03923-DRH-AKT (E.D.N.Y.), jointly seek to limit
the class period so that it includes:

     All purchasers of Symbol Technologies, Inc. ("Symbol")
     common stock during the period from March 12, 2004 through
     and including August 1, 2005 (the "Class Period") who were
     damaged thereby, excluding Defendants, officers and
     directors of Symbol and members of their immediate families
     and their legal representatives, heirs, successors or
     assigns, and any entity in which Defendants have or had a
     controlling interest.

The Parties contend that limiting the Class Period will not
prejudice any shareholders, who purchased Symbol stock from
April 29, 2003, to March 11, 2004, since they do not have
actionable legal claims and did not suffer any damages in
connection with any purchases made during that period.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=4IKQKScw

Lead Plaintiff Iron Workers Local #580 Pension Fund and the Class
are represented by:

          Marc I. Gross, Esq.
          Jeremy A. Lieberman, Esq.
          Michael J. Wernke, Esq.
          POMERANTZ LLP
          600 Third Avenue
          New York, NY 10016
          Telephone: (212) 661-1100
          E-mail: migross@pomlaw.com
                  jalieberman@pomlaw.com
                  mjwernke@pomlaw.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Andrew J. Levander, Esq.
          Kathleen N. Massey, Esq.
          Yelena Shreyberg, Esq.
          Sarah Lyons, Esq.
          DECHERT LLP
          1095 Avenue of the Americas
          New York, NY 1003 6-6797
          Telephone: (212) 698-3500
          Facsimile: (212) 698-3599
          E-mail: andrew.levander@dechert.com
                  kathleen.massey@dechert.com
                  yelena.shreyberg@dechert.com
                  sarah.lyons@dechert.com


TAYLOR FARMS: Recalls Chicken Salad Product Due to Misbranding
--------------------------------------------------------------
Taylor Farms Florida, Inc., an Orlando, Fla. establishment, is
recalling approximately 151 pounds of a chicken salad product due
to misbranding and undeclared allergens, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced
today. The product may contain wheat and sesame ingredients, known
allergens that are not declared on the mislabeled product label.

The ready-to-eat (RTE) chicken salad item was produced on May 23,
2016. The following product is subject to recall:

  --- 11-oz. (312-g) of individually packaged "Wawa thai style
      chicken mango salad with thai peanut flavored dressing"
      with a sell by date of 05/28/2016.

The products subject to recall bear establishment number "Est. P-
44818" inside the USDA mark of inspection. This item was shipped
to Wawa convenience stores in Florida.

The problem was discovered on May 25, 2016, when the establishment
notified FSIS personnel of the mislabeling issue affecting the
salads. The salads have the correct label on the top of the
package, but an incorrect back label saying "Wawa superfood
salad." Taylor Farms Florida, Inc. received notice from their
customer. There have been no confirmed reports of adverse
reactions due to consumption of this product. Anyone concerned
about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.


TJX COMPANIES: Recalls Foldable Lounge Chairs Due to Fall Risk
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
The TJX Companies Inc., of Framingham, Mass., announced a
voluntary recall of about 5,200 Foldable lounge chairs. Consumers
should stop using this product unless otherwise instructed.  It is
illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer
product.

The chairs can collapse unexpectedly, posing a fall and injury
hazard.

This recall involves T.J. Maxx and Marshalls foldable weatherproof
lounge chairs.  The chairs are made of an acacia wood frame and
striped fabric in two styles:  a natural oiled wood frame with red
and white stripe fabric or a white gloss frame with blue and white
stripe fabric. The chairs measure about 30 inches high by 42
inches long when unfolded.  The style number is printed on the
hang tag attached to the chair.  "MADE IN VIETNAM" is printed on a
label on the bottom of the chair frames.  The following chairs are
being recalled:

Chair Description

  TJ Maxx                         Style Number
  -------                         ------------
  Marshalls Style Number          153228
  Natural Oil Frame with          009420
  Red and White Stripe Fabric
  White Gloss Frame with Blue     153213
  and White Stripe Fabric         009432

TJX has received 15 reports of injuries from collapsing chairs.
Injuries included back and tailbone injuries, one report of a
fractured finger, three reports of stitches to fingers and reports
of cut, bruised or swollen fingers.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/8NNWr3

The recalled products were manufactured in Vietnam and sold at
T.J. Maxx and Marshalls stores nationwide during March 2016 for
about $40.

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled foldable
chairs and return them to any T.J. Maxx or Marshalls store for a
full refund.


TORNADO PRODUCTION: "Kinikin" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
----------------------------------------------------------
Preston Kinikin, individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Tornado Production Services, LLC,
Defendant, Case No. 2:16-cv-00185 (N.D. Tex., May 27, 2016), seeks
unpaid overtime wages, compensatory and liquidated damages and
reasonable attorney fees and costs under the Fair Labor Standards
Act.

Tornado builds and maintains fluid systems associated with the
drilling and the completion of wells and calibrate drilling fluid
test equipment where Plaintiff was employed as a fluid engineer.
Kinikin claims to be denied overtime pay.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Richard J. Burch, Esq.
     BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC
     8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1500
     Houston, TX 77046
     Tel: 713-877-8788
     Fax: 713-877-8065
     Email: rburch@brucknerburch.com

          - and -

     Michael A. Josephson, Esq.
     Andrew W. Dunlap, Esq.
     FIBICH, HAMPTON, LEEBRON, BRIGGS & JOSEPHSON, L.L.P.
     1150 Bissonnet
     Houston, TX 77005
     Tel: 713-751-0025
     Fax: 713-751-0030
     Email: mjosephson@fhl-law.com


TRANSNATIONAL BANKCARD: Old Town Pizza Seeks Class Certification
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit entitled OLD TOWN PIZZA OF LOMBARD,
INC., an Illinois corporation, individually and as the
representative of a class of similarly-situated persons v.
TRANSNATIONAL BANKCARD L.L.C., an Illinois limited liability
company, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Case No. 1:16-cv-05894 (N.D. Ill.),
submits its motion for class certification pursuant to Damasco v.
Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891, 896 (7th Cir. 2011).  The Plaintiff
proposes this class definition:

     All persons who (1) on or after four years prior to the
     filing of this action, (2) were sent telephone facsimile
     messages of material advertising the commercial availability
     or quality of any property, goods, or services by or on
     behalf of Defendants, and (3) which Defendants did not have
     prior express permission or invitation, or (4) which did not
     display a proper opt-out notice.

Old Town Pizza alleges that the Defendants sent it and others a
standardized form advertisement.  Old Town Pizza anticipates that
the proposed class definition will change after discovery defines
the precise contours of the class and the advertisements that were
sent.  Old Town Pizza asks for leave to submit a brief and other
evidence in support of the Motion after discovery about the class
elements has been completed.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=zyJaWj7v

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brian J. Wanca, Esq.
          ANDERSON + WANCA
          3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500
          Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
          Telephone: (847) 368-1500
          Facsimile: (847) 368-1501
          E-mail: bwanca@andersonwanca.com


TROYER(R) CHEESE: Recalls Nut Products Due to Listeria
------------------------------------------------------
Troyer(R) Cheese Inc, under advice from its packaging facility
concerning, CRANBERRY NUT DELIGHT MIX PREPACK, HONEY ISLAND CRUNCH
MIX PREPACKAGED,  PRETZELS PEANUT BUTTER PREPACKAGED, WALNUT
HALVES/PIECES PREPACKAGED, SUNFLOWER SEEDS R&S PREPACKAGED AND
SUNFLOWER SEEDS R&S BULK is recalling a limited number of products
that have the potential to be contaminated with Listeria
monocytogenes, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes
fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and
others with weakened immune systems. Although healthy individuals
may suffer only short-term symptoms such as high fever, severe
headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea, listeria
infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant
women.

A limited number of the following products, under the Backroad
Country brand, are being voluntarily recalled:

  CODE   DESCRIPTION    SIZE      PRODUCT/CASE     BEST IF
  ----   -----------    ----      BARCODE          USED BY
                                  ------------     -------
  15359  CRANBERRY      12/9 OZ   0 49646 11038    4  May 2017
         NUT DELIGHT
         MIX PPK
  15356  HONEY ISLAND   12/9 OZ   0 49646 10090    3  May 2017
         CRUNCH MIX
         PPK
  15318  WALNUT HALVES  12/6 OZ   0 49646 12073    4  May 2017
         /PIECES PPK
  15372  PRETZELS        12/7 OZ  0 49646 12079    6  May 2017
         PEANUT BUTTER
         PPK
  15301  SUNFLOWER       12/7 OZ   0 49646 11219   7  May 2017
         SEEDS R&S PPK
  2160   SUNFLOWER SEEDS 1/30 LB   1 13671 02091   5  May 2017
         R & S BULK

Recalled retail items were sold in packaged bags and are marked
with Best By dates located on the front or back of the packages.
The products were packaged at Amish Wedding Foods and distributed
by Troyer Cheese, Inc., between the dates of February 18, 2016 and
May 24, 2016. Shipments were to the following states: AL, AR, FL,
GA, IL, IN, KS, LA, MD, MI, MN, MO, MS, MT, NC, NJ, OH, OK, PA,
SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, WI, WV.

Although no illnesses have been reported to date, Troyer Cheese
Inc. is voluntarily recalling all affected products in an
abundance of caution. This recall is being conducted with the
knowledge of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Consumers are urged not to consume these products.  Consumers who
purchased these products may take them back to the store where
they purchased them for a refund or simply discard them.
Consumers seeking information may call 1-877-343-1614 Monday
through Friday, 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM Eastern Standard Time.

Retailers and wholesale customers should check their inventories
and shelves to confirm that none of the products are present or
available for purchase by consumers or in warehouse inventories.

This recall is being conducted with the knowledge of the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA).

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/qGq37M


TVI INC: "Godhigh" Suit to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages
--------------------------------------------------------
Earl Godhigh and Angela Osgood, individually and on behalf of all
other members of the general public similarly situated and on
behalf of other similarly aggrieved employees pursuant to the
California Private Attorneys General Act, Plaintiffs, v. TVI, Inc.
d/b/a Savers and Value Village; and Savers, LLC, Defendants, Case
No. 4:16-cv-02874-DMR (N.D. Cal., May 27, 2016), seeks unpaid
overtime pay, liquidated damages, equitable and injunctive relief,
attorney fees and costs, including expert fees pursuant California
Wage and Hour Law, California Business and Professions Code and
the Fair Labor Standards Act.

TVI, Inc. is a Washington corporation with its principal place of
business in Bellevue, Washington. It does business in the United
States and Canada under Savers and Value Village in the United
States. It is global thrift retailer offering used clothing,
accessories and household goods.

Godhigh was employed by Savers in their Berkeley, California store
as a production manager while Osgood worked as a retail sales
manager at a Savers store in St. Louis, Missouri. Both claim
proper compensation for all hours worked including overtime
compensation.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Jahan C. Sagafi, Esq.
     OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
     One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor
     San Francisco, CA 94111
     Telephone: (415) 638-8800
     Facsimile: (415) 638-8810
     E-Mail: jsagafi@outtengolden.com

          - and -

     Gregg I. Shavitz, Esq.
     Camar R. Jones, Esq.
     SHAVITZ LAW GROUP, P.A.
     1515 S. Federal Hwy., Suite 404
     Boca Raton, FL 33432
     Telephone: (561) 447-8888
     Facsimile: (561) 447-8831
     E-mail: gshavitz@shavitzlaw.com
     E-mail: cjones@shavitzlaw.com


UNILIFE CORP: "Gomez" Sues Over Share Price Drop
------------------------------------------------
Manuel A. Quintero Gomez, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, plaintiff, v. Unilife Corporation, Alan
Shortall, John Ryan, R. Richard Wieland II, Dennis P. Pyers, David
C. Hastings and Jim Bosnjak, Defendants, Case No. 1:16-cv-03986
(S.D. N.Y., May 27, 2016), seeks compensatory damages, reasonable
costs and expenses incurred including counsel and expert fees and
such other and further relief under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

Unilife is a designer, manufacturer and supplier of injectable
drug delivery systems. Defendants allegedly violated the Company
policies and procedures regarding adequate internal controls over
accounting and financial reporting resulting in its inability to
file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2016, by the prescribed filing deadline and that its financial
statements, as well as business, operations and prospects, were
false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Gomez purchased Unilife common stock and lost substantially after
corrective disclosures.

Alan Shortall, John Ryan, R. Richard Wieland II, Dennis P. Pyers,
David C. Hastings, and Jim Bosnjak served in the company board.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Jeremy A. Lieberman, Esq.
     J. Alexander Hood II, Esq.
     Marc Gorrie, Esq.
     POMERANTZ LLP
     600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Telephone: (212) 661-1100
     Facsimile: (212) 661-8665
     Email: jalieberman@pomlaw.com
            ahood@pomlaw.com
            mgorrie@pomlaw.comb

          - and -

     Patrick V. Dahlstrom, Esq.
     POMERANTZ LLP
     10 South La Salle Street, Suite 3505
     Chicago, IL 60603
     Telephone: (312) 377-1181
     Facsimile: (312) 377-1184
     Email: pdahlstrom@pomlaw.com

          - and -

     Peretz Bronstein, Esq.
     BRONSTEIN, GEWIRTZ & GROSSMAN, LLC
     60 East 42nd Street, Suite 4600
     New York, NY 10165
     Telephone: (212) 697-6484
     Facsimile (212) 697-7296
     Email: peretz@bgandg.com


UNITED RECEIVABLES: Class Certification Sought in "Rheuark" Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned JENNIFER RHEUARK, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated v. UNITED RECEIVABLES
GROUP, LLC, Case No. 2:16-cv-01377-R-KS (C.D. Cal.), asks the
Court to certify a class of all persons who, without prior express
written consent, received non-emergency telephone calls on his or
her cellular telephone line from, or on behalf of, Defendant using
either an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or
prerecorded voice.

Ms. Rheuark also asks the Court to appoint her as representative
of the Robodialer Class, and to appoint Amanda Olvera as
representative of the Autodialer Class.  She further asks the
Court to appoint Bursor & Fisher, P.A., as class counsel.

The Court will commence a hearing on July 18, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.,
to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=jkbd85Qy

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          L. Timothy Fisher, Esq.
          BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
          1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
          Walnut Creek, CA 94596
          Telephone: (925) 300-4455
          Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
          E-mail: ltfisher@bursor.com

               - and -

          Scott A. Bursor, Esq.
          BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
          888 Seventh Avenue
          New York, NY 10019
          Telephone: (212) 989-9113
          Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
          E-mail: scott@bursor.com


VITAMINERALS VM: Faces Comprehensive Suit in S.D. Fla.
------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Vitaminerals VM/Orthopedics, Ltd.
The case is captioned Comprehensive Health Care Systems, Inc., a
Florida Corporation individually and as the representative of a
class of similarly-situated persons, the Plaintiff, v.
Vitaminerals VM/Orthopedics, Ltd., The Hygenic Corporation, and
John Does 1-12, the Defendants, Case No. 9:16-cv-80889-WJZ (S.D.
Fla., June 1, 2016). The assigned Judge is Ho. William J. Zloch.

Vitaminerals is a medical and hospital equipment company located
in Hudson, Ohio.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Phillip A Bock, Esq.
          Bock & Hatch, LLC
          134 N. La Salle St., Ste. 1000
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Telephone: (312) 658 5501
          Facsimile: (312) 658 5555
          E-mail: phil@bockhatchllc.com


VOLKSWAGEN GROUP: Faces "Molwitz" Suit in D.N.J.
------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit has been filed against Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
The case is captioned Karl Molwitz, individually, and on behalf of
a class of similarly situated individuals, the Plaintiff, v.
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen Of America, Inc.,
Audi of America, Inc., Audi Aktiengesellschaft, and Volkswagen
Aktiengesellschaft, the Defendants, Case No. #: 2:16-cv-03120-JLL-
JAD (D.N.J., June 1, 2016). The assigned Judge is Hon. Jose L.
Linares.

Volkswagen Group of America designs, manufactures, and sells
automobiles in the United States and internationally. The company
operates as a subsidiary of Volkswagen AG, and is based in
Herndon, Virginia.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Matthew Ross Mendelsohn, Esq.
          MAZIE SLATER KATZ & FREEMAN LLC
          103 Eisenhower Parkway
          Roseland, NJ 07068
          Telephone: (973) 228 9898
          E-mail: mmendelsohn@mskf.net


WAFFLE HOUSE: Certification of 3 Classes Sought in "Jones" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit styled WILLIAM JONES, on behalf of
himself and others similarly situated v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC., et
al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01637-RBD-DAB (M.D. Fla.), moves the Court
for an order certifying these classes:

     Adverse Action Class: All persons who applied for employment
     with Waffle House, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Waffle
     House") as hourly employees in the United States from
     October 1, 2010 until March 27, 2015 (and in North Carolina
     from October 1, 2010 until June 6, 2011), and (a) on whom
     Waffle House ran background checks using The Source for
     Public Data, LP ("Public Data"), and (b) whom Waffle House
     did not hire.

     Inadequate Adverse Action Notice Class: All persons who
     applied for employment with Waffle House as hourly employees
     in the United States (but excluding North Carolina) from
     October 1, 2013 until March 27, 2015, and (a) on whom Waffle
     House ran background checks using Public Data, and (b) whom
     Waffle House did not hire.

     Catchall Class: All persons who applied for employment with
     Waffle House as hourly employees in the United States from
     October 1, 2010 until March 27, 2015 (and in North Carolina
     from October 1, 2010 until June 6, 2011) on whom Waffle
     House ran background checks using Public Data.

The proposed classes exclude counsel representing the classes,
governmental entities, Defendants, any entity in which Defendants
have a controlling interest, Defendants' officers, directors,
affiliates, legal representatives, employees, co-conspirators,
successors, subsidiaries, and assigns, any judicial officer
presiding over this matter, the members of their immediate
families and judicial staff, and any individual whose interests
are antagonistic to other putative class members.

Mr. Jones also asks the Court to appoint him as Class
Representative and to appoint CounselOne, PC, as Class Counsel.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=Wfya6DEi

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Anthony J. Orshansky, Esq.
          Alexandria R. Kachadoorian, Esq.
          Justin Kachadoorian, Esq.
          COUNSELONE, PC
          9301 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 650
          Beverly Hills, CA 90210
          Telephone: (310) 277-9945
          Facsimile: (424) 277-3727
          E-mail: anthony@counselonegroup.com
                  alexandria@counselonegroup.com
                  justin@counselonegroup.com

               - and -

          Michael J. Pascucci, Esq.
          Joshua H. Eggnatz, Esq.
          EGGNATZ, LOPATIN & PASCUCCI, LLP
          5400 S. University Drive, Suite 413
          Davie, FL 33328
          Telephone: (954) 889-3359
          Facsimile: (954) 889-5913
          E-mail: Mpascucci@ELPLawyers.com
                  JEggnatz@EggnatzLaw.com


WAL-MART STORES: Nikmanesh Seeks Certification of Five Classes
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiffs in the lawsuit entitled AFROUZ NIKMANESH, ELVIS
ATENCIO, ANNA NGUYEN, AND EFFIE SPENTZOS, on behalf of themselves,
the general public, and all others similarly situated v. WAL-MART
STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, and WAL-MART ASSOCIATES,
INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Case No. 8:15-cv-00202-AG-JCG (C.D. Cal.), ask the Court to
certify these classes:

     (a) All current and former non-exempt employees, employed by
         Defendants as Pharmacists in the State of California,
         who took the Wal-Mart sponsored APhA Immunization
         Certification Training Course (the "Training Course")
         during their employment, within four years of the filing
         of the original complaint until the date of judgment,
         and who were not paid any wages for the home study and
         test portions of the Training Course (the "Training
         Course Class").

     (b) All current and former non-exempt employees, employed by
         Defendants as Pharmacists in the State of California,
         who did not take a 10-minute rest break during the first
         4 hours of their shift, or a second 10-minute rest break
         for all shifts of 6-10 hours, when they were scheduled
         to be the only Pharmacist on duty at any time during
         their shift, within four years before the filing of the
         original complaint until the date of judgment (the "Rest
         Break Class").

     (c) All current and former non-exempt employees, employed by
         Defendants as Pharmacists within the State of
         California, who are members of the Training Course Class
         and/or the Rest Break Class, and as a result of the
         claims alleged herein, were not provided with accurate,
         itemized wage statements as required by California Labor
         Code Section 226, within one year before the filing of
         the original Complaint until the date of judgment ("Wage
         Settlement Class").

     (d) All former non-exempt employees, employed by Defendants
         as Pharmacists in the State of California, who are
         members of either the Training Course Class and/or the
         Rest Break Class, and as a result of the claims alleged
         herein, were not paid all wages due and owing at the
         time of their separation as required by California Labor
         Code Sections 201-203, within three years from the
         filing of the original Complaint until the date of
         judgment ("Waiting Time Class").


     (e) Plaintiffs also seek to certify a class under
         California's Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code
         Sections 17200, et seq.).

The Plaintiffs also ask the Court to appoint them as class
representatives; to appoint Eric M. Epstein, Esq., of Eric M.
Epstein, APC, Mark R. Thierman, Esq., and Joshua D. Buck, Esq., of
Thierman Buck, LLP, and Dayton B. Parcells, III, Esq., of Parcells
Law Firm as class counsel; and to allow them to send notice to
certified class members advising class members of the Action.

The Court will commence a hearing on August 8, 2016, at 10:00
a.m., to consider the Motion.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=rh5aojwp

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Eric M. Epstein, Esq.
          ERIC M. EPSTEIN, APC
          1901 Avenue of the Stars, #1100
          Los Angeles, CA 90067-6002
          Telephone: (310) 552-5366
          E-mail: emepstein@aol.com

               - and -

          Mark R. Thierman, Esq.
          Joshua D. Buck, Esq.
          THIERMAN BUCK LLP
          7287 Lakeside Drive
          Reno, NV 89511
          Telephone: (775) 284-1500
          E-mail: Mark@Thiermanbuck.com
                  Josh @Thiermanbuck.com

               - and -

          Dayton B. Parcells, III, Esq.
          PARCELLS LAW FIRM
          1901 Avenue of the Stars, #1100
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310) 201-9882
          E-mail: dbparcells@parcellslaw.com


WEXFORD HEALTH: Kucinsky Seeks Certification of Prisoners Class
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Plaintiff in the lawsuit entitled Charles Kucinsky and all
past, present and future prisoners of Pontiac Seg Unit v. Donna,
Jones, McCormick, Prentiss, Randy Pfister, Andrew Tillman, Wexford
Health Source Inc, John Baldwin and Michael Melvin, Case No. 1:16-
cv-01191-CSB (C.D. Ill.), move the Court for class certification.

A copy of the Motion is available at no charge at
http://d.classactionreporternewsletter.com/u?f=O79MsRf1


WHOLE FOODS: Recalls Kimchi Products Due to Fish & Nuts
-------------------------------------------------------
Whole Foods Market is issuing an advisory to customers who
purchased Spicy Kimchi, White Kimchi, Kimchi Fried Rice and Kimchi
Guacamole from one of its Los Angeles-area stores because the
items contained fish, shellfish or tree nuts (pine nuts) that were
not listed on product labels. All potentially affected products
have been removed from store shelves, and the company is recalling
the items out of an abundance of caution.  People who have an
allergy or severe sensitivity to tree nuts, fish or shellfish run
the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they
consume these products.

Included in this advisory are the following items, which were
offered at the company's 365 by Whole Foods Market store in Silver
Lake between May 25 and May 27:

Spicy Kimchi offered at the salad bar (undeclared fish/shellfish)

Kimchi Fried Rice offered on the hot food bar (undeclared tree
nuts)

White Kimchi offered at the salad bar (undeclared tree nuts)
Kimchi Guacamole offered in one-pound pre-packaged clear plastic
containers with lids, item number 20185700000 and sell-by dates of
May 29 to May 31 (undeclared fish/shellfish)

The missing allergens were discovered in-house by an employee. No
illnesses have been reported to date.

Customer who purchased the affected items and wish to return them
can bring them back into the store for a full refund.  Customers
with additional questions about this advisory can contact the
store at 323.378.3891 Monday through Friday between the hours of 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. PST.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
https://is.gd/rvZEya


WILD PURGE: "Stanat" Suit to Recover Overtime Pay
-------------------------------------------------
David Stanat on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Wild Purge I, LLC and Ward Nohavitza,
Defendant, Case No. 5:16-cv-00482 (W.D. Tex., May 27, 2016), seeks
unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, reasonable attorney
fees, costs and expenses of this action, including expert witness
costs, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and such other and
further relief under the Fair Labor Standard Act.

Wild Purge I, LLC is a Texas limited liability company and
maintains its principal place of business in San Antonio, Bexar
County, Texas. It performs well site services at various oil well
sites. Stanat worked as well site supervisor and was allegedly
misclassified as contractors, thus denied overtime compensation.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Greg S. Gober, Esq.
     BLAIES & HIGHTOWER, L.L.P.
     421 W. 3rd Street, Suite 900
     Fort Worth, TX 76102
     Tel: 817-3340800
     Fax: 817-334-0574
     Email: greggober@bhilaw.com


WINDSOR PROPERTY: "Hughes" Sues Over Denied Pay Stubs
-----------------------------------------------------
Robert Hughes, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated,
Plaintiff, v. Windsor Property Management Company, a Delaware
corporation, the General Investment and Development Companies
d/b/a GID and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants, Case No.
BC621831 (Cal. Super., May 27, 2016), seeks penalties, restitution
for unfair competition, disgorgement or profits, general, special
and incidental damages, punitive damages, pre-judgment and post-
judgment interest, attorney's fees and such other and further
relief under the California Labor Code, relevant orders of the
Industrial Welfare Commission and California Business and
Professions Code.

Windsor Property Management is a full service property management
company, managing property of all sizes for investors and owners
who primarily live outside of Windsor and Essex County.

General Investment and Development Company is a fully integrated
real estate investment company located in 125 High Street, Boston,
MA 02110.

Defendants allegedly denied Plaintiff timely, accurate and
itemized wage statements.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     David Yeremian, Esq.
     David Keledjian, Esq.
     DAVID YEREMIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
     535 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 705
     Glendale, CA 91203
     Telephone: (818) 230-8380
     Facsimile: (818) 230-0308
     Email: david@yeremianlaw.com
            davidk@yeremianlaw.com


WORLDWIDE FLIGHT: "Bautista" Suit Seeks Wages Under Labor Code
--------------------------------------------------------------
Guillermo Bautista, individually, and on behalf of all other
similarly situated current and former employees of Defendants, the
Plaintiff, v Worldwide Flight Services, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation; and Does 1-50, inclusive, the Defendants, Case No.
B0622372 (Cal. Super. Ct., June 1, 2016), seeks to recover unpaid
wages, interest, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs pursuant
to Cal. Labor Code.

According to the complaint, the Defendants failed to pay the
Plaintiff and the other members of the Class overtime compensation
for the hours they have worked in excess of the maximum hours
permissible by law as required by California Labor Code. The
Plaintiffs and the other members of the Class are regularly
required to work overtime hours.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Farzad Rastegar, Esq.
          Candace Kwon, Esq.
          RASTEGAR LAW GROUP, APC
          22760 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 200
          Torrance, CA 90505
          Telephone: (310) 961 9600
          Facsimile: (310) 961 9094
          E-mail: farzad@rastegarlawgroup.com
                  candace@rastegarlawgroup.com



                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Marion
Alcestis A. Castillon, Ma. Cristina Canson, Noemi Irene A. Adala,
Joy A. Agravante, Valerie Udtuhan, Julie Anne L. Toledo,
Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2016. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.



                 * * *  End of Transmission  * * *